279 ’ Sac ut . eee . a= & 2 oe eee Mam, Te tek See eee ee ee ee est ee ee ee ee a en ee eed re ee oe ee ee ee te ee ree ae ae ee a a es HARVARD UNIVERSITY eB LIBRARY OF THE Museum of Comparative Zoology ~ > ew Se TH AFRICAN MUSEUM VOLUME 48 ee at ANNALS GF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM VOLUME 48 PRINTED FOR THE TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 1964-1967 MUS. COMP. ZOOL. LIBRARY wae G1? ele lm yi te os Gio BEC 7 19? Twi ¥ eA Mike e polit) _ HARVARD ia4") UNIVERSITY | : ROTI at % : y HAP ule » : j # rn i, ; Oe) Ae ie, hoe S ? @ PRINTED IN SOUTH AFRICA BY’ Eliot OF CONTENTS BARNARD, K. H. Isopoda and Amphipoda collected by the Gough Island scientific survey (published September 1965) Barry, T. H. On the epipterygoid—alisphenoid transition in Therapsida (published November 1965) Bonk, E. L. & SINGER, R. Hipparion from Langebaanweg, Cape Province and a revision of the genus in Africa (published November 1965) Boonstra, L. D. The girdles and limbs of the Gorgonopsia of the Tapinocephalus zone (published November 1965) BoonstrA, L. D. The girdles and limbs of the pristerognathid Therocephalia (published April 1964) BoonstrA, L. D. The Russian dinocephalian Deuterosaurus (published September 1965) Boonstra, L. D. The skull of Struthiocephalus kitchingi (published November 1965) way, J. H. A review of the family Ampharetidae (Polychaeta) (published April 1964) Gess, F. W. Contribution to the knowledge of the South African species of the genus Ceramius Latreille (Hymenoptera: Masaridae) (published September 1965) Haropine, J. P. & Situ, W. A. Some South African fresh water Copepoda (published April 1967) Hu. ey, P. A. The validity of Raja rhizacanthus Regan and Raja pullopunctata Smith, based on a study of the clasper (published November 1966) Juss, R. A. A new palaeoniscid fish from the Witteberg Series (Lower Carboniferous) of South Africa (published November 1965) KulrrEr, J. G. J. Contributions to the knowledge of the South African species of the genus Pisidium (Lamellibranchiata) (published April 1964) LAWRENCE, R. F. New cavernicolous spiders of South Africa (published April 1964) Mixiarp, N. A. H. Hydroids of the Vema Seamount (published November 1966) Mi.yiarp, N. A. H. The Hydrozoa of the south and west coasts of South Africa. Part II. The Lafoeidae, Syntheciidae and Sertulariidae (published February 1964) Miiarp, N. A. H. The Hydrozoa of the south and west coasts of South Africa. Part III. The Gymno- blastea and small families of Caluptoblastea (published June 1966) PEnriTH, M. J. The fishes of Tristan da Cunha, Gough Island and the Vema Seamount (published March 1967) PenriTH, M. J. A new species of flatfish, Mancopsetta milfordi, from South Africa, with notes on the genus Mancopsetta (published September 1965) PEenriTH, M.-L. Studies on the South African Clinidae. I. Description of a new species of Pavoclinus, and redescription of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard) (published September 1965) Page 195 399 273 237 I2!I 233 251 97 219 515 497 267 523 181 2er LIST OF CONTENTS PenriTH, M.-L. See TALBOT, F. H. SINGER, R. See Bonk, E. L. SmirH, W. A. See Harvine, J. P. TALsor,(F. EH. See WAPENAAR, M.-L. TAxsoT, F. H. & PenritH, M.-L. Ctenogobius cloatus Smith, 1960, a synonym of Ctenogobius saldanha (Barnard, 1927) 189 (published September 1965) WAPENAAR, M.-L. & TALBoT, F. H. Note on the rigidity of the pectoral fin of Makaira indica (Cuvier) (published April 167 1964) NEW GENERIC NAMES PROPOSED IN THIS VOLUME Bicorona Millard, 1966 (Corynidae), 440 Mentzichthys Jubb, 1965 (Palaeoniscidae), 270 Speleoderces Lawrence, 1964 (Leptonetidae), 62 Kinnosaurus Boonstra, 1964 (Pristerognathidae), 143 ‘to Tu r. » A MAM ok a ry x ia 4%, » ae ae ON ee hae bs i, URC OTH, OLE ee Ne eae J « a) / : < Sh a ” ar is ach} ee ie Y PP hs f oy , aa hho? i % . p ye re e hl pe s ’ i? ‘ eit ; aia rH = } a i f ‘ ) f — i i i | ' | nl 7 4 ’ tae ae, ‘ aii : { t i ; a7 By } } 4 Pdi ud : 3 + Ul via , ' iF " Warn rt ral to A f ~C. MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY MAY 29 1964 HARVARD UNIVERSITY, THE HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA PART II. THE LAFOEIDAE, SYNTHECIIDAE AND SERTULARIIDAE N. A. H. MILLARD February 1964 Februarie Volume 48 Band Peru) © )\ eel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from The Librarian, South African Museum, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van Die Bibliotekaresse, Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1(1-2), a(1, 3> 5s 7) 3(1), 5(2, is 7a t.-p.1.) 6(1, t.-p.i.), 8, Q(1), 10(I, 3), LDE7); 21, 24(2) 31(1-2), 44(4) Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel R1.00 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty. Ltd. Die Rustica Pers Edms. Bpk. Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap ee MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY MAY 29 1964 THE HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OFARVARD SOUTH AFRICA UNIVERSITY PART II. THE LAFOEIDAE, SYNTHECIIDAE AND SERTULARIIDAE By N. A. H. MiILtarp Koology Department, University of Cape Town (With 16 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . ae peat re DIAMOnAst sy. 8 EASE OF SPECIES Oye. G Bam. Gafoeidae . . §.. 7 Fam. Syntheciidae . . 22 Fam. Sertulariidae . . 25 DMRIMATV tt se? sy. SY. 154. Etereneessreya = fre 2. 55 INTRODUCTION This paper represents the second part of a systematic account of the hydroids of the south and west coasts of South Africa. The first part, dealing with the Plumulariidae, appeared in these Annals, vol. 46, 1962. The scope of the work and the source of the material were detailed in the introduction to _ Part I, and need not be repeated here. As before the details of the collecting stations are given in the station list which follows, and only the catalogue numbers are quoted in the systematic account. Occasional records which do not come from the south or west coast, but which have been mentioned for some special reason, have been put between brackets. The author wishes to acknowledge the help of all those bodies or individuals who have helped materially or financially to build up the very extensive collection now present in the University of Cape Town, and also the South African Museum for access to the material dredged by the s.s. Pieter Faure. Acknowledgements are also due to the British Museum of Natural History for _ permission to examine material housed there, and to the Munich Museum for the loan of mounted slides. Type specimens of new species have been deposited in the South African Museum and have been given a Museum registered number in addition to the University catalogue number. The Trustees of the South African Museum acknowledge with thanks receipt of grants from the University of Cape Town and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research towards the cost of publication. I Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (1), 1964: 1-56, 16 figs. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM STATION LIST A. Littoral material from Oudekraal on the west coast of the Cape Peninsula. Position: 33°58°5'S/18°22-2’E. Date A 123 153-34 A 381 25.38.34 A 382 13.5.34 A 384 25.8.34 AFR. Material dredged by the government research vessel, r.s. Africana. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom AFR 736 17.8.47 30°42°4’S/15°59°2’E 201 co gn S, Sh AFR 743 21.8.47 30°2'S/15 2°E 364 gn S AFR 835 20.11.47 ?35°9/S/19°2’E 188 AFR 866 9.1.48 34°36-8’S/19°16-4’E 38 S,R AFR 945 19.3.48 36°25’S/21°8’E 177 S,R AFR 1028.0 15.5.48 28°28’S/32°25:8’E 27 fS,R B, BB. Littoral material from Lambert’s Bay on the west coast. Position: 32°5/S/18°14’E. Date B 105 28:7.38 B 114 29.7.98 B.1g7 || 4.7.38 BB 13 18.1.57 BMR. Bushman’s River Estuary, on sand and muddy banks. Date: September, 1950. Position: 33°41'S/26°40’E. Depth: 2-44m. BRE. Breede River Estuary, littoral. Date: 7.7.51. Position: 34°25’'S/20°51°5’E. CP. Littoral material from various localities on the west coast of the Cape Peninsula. Date Locality Position CP 336 12.5.49 Oudekraal 33°58°5'S/18°22-2’E CP 379 15.4.53 Sea Point 33°55°2'S/18°22-6’E CP 650 1.2.61 Bakoven 93°57 8) lo 227 a7e CPR. Material from various localities in the Cape Province. Date Locality Position Depth (m.) CPR 7 15.1.50 The Haven 32°15’S/28°57’E littoral CPR 9 30.4.50 Glentana Strand 34.°4’S/22°20’E littoral CPR 46 20.6.59 Umgazi Bay 31°43’S/29°26’E a | E. Littoral material from Port Elizabeth on the south coast. Date: 9.7.36 Position: 33°56'S/25°36’E. KNY. Knysna Estuary, on the south coast. Date: July, 1947. Position: 34.°5'S/23°4'E (average). Depth (m.) Bottom M KNY 22 1-4 KNY 30 5-7 S,M KNY 57 II‘5 R KNY 70 2-6 S KNY 71 7, Sh, S, M HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 3 L. Littoral material from East London, on the south coast. Date: 10.7.37. Position: 33°1'S/27°54’E. LAM. Dredged in Lambert’s Bay, west coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LAM 2 16.1.57 32°4°5/S/18°18-3’E 17 S, R LAM 7 18.1.57 32°5'9/18°17-9’E 23 R, Sh, $ LAM 9 17.0657, 92 4:7 0/18 17-7 EB 23 S, Sh LAM 13 19.1.57 32°4'5/18°18-1’E 18 R LAM 14 18.1.57 32°5'5/18°17'7'E 17 5, oh, R LAM 18 18.05.57 °32°4°6°5/18'17°8’E 17 R LAM 23 T7057 92°4°t'S/18°18-6/E 15 S, Sh LAM 30 19.1.57 32°5°1'S/18°17°7’E 20 R LAM 35 19.1.57 32°5°5'9/18°17°7’E 27°5 R, Sh LAM 40 19.1.57 32°5°5/9/18°17-6’E 28 S, Sh LAM 41 200.57), 92° R ola 19°) 20 S, Sh LAM 45 STs 1 eo RSG too" 2, 8 S, R LAM 46 22.1.57 32°4°49/18°17-7’ E 23 R LAM 59 23.1.57 32°9'S/18°18’E 16 i, ats LIZ. Dredged in Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth, south coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LIZ 2 5-4-54 33°55°7'S/25°37°2'E Or5a RE | Rie -7 6.4.54 33°58-1’S/25°38-9’E 9 St, R LIZ 11 6.4.54 33°57°2'S/25°38’E 9°5 R, Clay LIZ 13 6.4.54 33°58°2’S/25°38-8’E 75 S LIZ 16 7.4.54 33°58°4'S/25°40°5’E 14 St LIZ 27-40 11.4.54 34°0°8'S/25°42-4’E 6 R MB. Dredged in Mossel Bay, south coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom MB 8-12 12.1.56 934°4°3/S/22°13-0’E 19 R MB 15 13.1.56 34°r1:1’S/22°10-1’E 16 5 MB 24 190.50 34 Til 'S/22°9°9°E 19 R MB 26 13.1.50° 34°11'1'S/22°10-1’E 21 S MB 39 16.1.56 34°10°1’S/22°8-0’E 9 R MB 47 Mot 5oy -S4- rig 3/22 10-0'E, 10 R MB 52 7.1.50 34°11°0'5/22°9'9'E 14 R,S MB 58 18.1.56 34°4°3’S/22°13°5’E 12°5 R MB 59 18.1.56 34°4°1'S/22°13°9/E a." R MB 64 18.1.56 34°4°8’S/22°13°1’E 26 - co S, Sh, R MB 69 19.1.56 34°8-6'S/22°7:3’E 13°5 S,R MB 72 19.1.56 34°9°1'S/22°7-2’E 12 R, S, Sh MB 84 21.1.56 34°11-4/S/22°10-1’E 29 R MB 88 18.1.56 34°4°8'S/22°13°1’E 26 co S, Sh, R NAD. Dredged off Natal, east coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom NAD 1 17.5.58 30°47°1’S/30°29°1’E 44 St NAD 22 12.8.58 29°58’S/31°2’E 49 PP. Littoral material from Paternoster, west coast. Date: 24.9.57. Position: 32°43'S/17°55’E. S. Littoral material from Still Bay, south coast. Date: 10.1.32. Position: 34°23'S/21°26’E. 4. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SAMH. Material from the South African Museum. Specimens 146-350 and 374-382 were dredged by the s.s. Pieter Faure. Their positions were given in the original records as compass bearings off salient points on the coast, and were probably not very accurate. These have been converted into latitude and longitude and are given to the nearest minute. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom SAMH 146 23.6.1898 South of Mossel Bay SAMH 151-156 15.7-1898 34°8’S/22°16’E St SAMH 171-172 11.11.1898 33°49’S/25°56’E SAMH 173-178 19.11.1898 33°45'S/26°44’E 73-78°5 M SAMH 181 22.12.1898 32°52’S/28°12’E SAMH 182-192 28.12.1898 33°9’S/28°3’E 86 S, Sh, R SAMH 204-209 7.3.1899 33°59'S/25°51'E 24-27 SAMH 213 24.3.1899 33°50'S/26°35’E gi M SAMH 216-220 19.6.1899 34°26’S/21°42’E f{S SAMH 228-232 20.9.1899 34°15'S/22°10°5’E M SAMH 234-237 5-7-1900 34°27’S/20°58’E 51 Crl SAMH 246 11.10.1900 34°8’S/22°59°5’E 73 S, Sh, Crl SAMH 251-252 15.7.190I 33°13°5'S/27°58’E 89 brk Sh SAMH 256-272 17.7.1901 33°7'S/27°47°5E £S SAMH 281-282 25.7.190I1 32°50'S/28°18-5’E 86 brk Sh SAMH 288-294 13.8.1901 32°45’S/28°26’E 53 brk Sh, St SAMH 295 13.8.1901 32°47'S/28°28’E 82 brk Sh SAMH go1 15.8.1901 32°42’S/28°26’E 31 R SAMH 310-314 10.9.1901 33°54’S/26°51’E 120 brk Sh, St SAMH 316-318 23.9.1901 34°5'S/26°34’E 115 S, Sh, bk Spks SAMH 321 19.2.1902 34°32'S/24°27-5’E 137 S, Sh, R SAMH 325 22.9.1904 34°12’S/22°15°5’E 51 £S SAMH 334 4.10.1904. 34°12’S/22°15°5’E 51 £S SAMH 348 19.10.1904 34°15°5’S/22°14’E 64 M SAMH 350 22.8.1905 33°52’S/26°9’E M SAMH 358-359 19.6.1914 33°55’S/18°27’E SAMH 374-382 15.3.1899 33°47'S/26°19’E 18-29 S, Sh, St SAMH 403 —.4.1962 28°37’S/16°25’E 10-20 SAMH 409 —.10.1962 28°37’S/16°25’E 10-20 SB. Saldanha Bay, west coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom SB 150-168 —.9.57 33°2°5/S/18°2’E littoral R SB 194 1.5.59 33°3°5'9/17°59°2'E 20 R,S SB 253 22.4.62 33°3'S/17°56-6’E 35 fkhS SCD. Dredged off the south coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom SCD 3 18.4.58 34°30’S/24°40’E 102 R SCD 5 19.4.58 34°15'S/25°5’E II R, Sh SCD 29 22.6.58 33°38-6’S/26°54-7’E 56 R SCD 33 21.5.58 35°3'S/27°56-2’E 65 S, Sh SCD 36-37 19.5.58 32°15°2'S/28°57-7'E 49°5 R SCD 50 18.5.58 31°38-8’S/29°34°4’E 33 R SCD 52 20.8.58 34°1'S/25°45°5’E 46 R SCD 56 19.8.58 33°37'S/26°56-6’E 46 SCD 60 16.8.58 33°2’S/27°56-2’E 46 SCD 61 15.8.58 32°17°7'S/28°54°5’E 49 SCD 75 16.7.59 32°33’S/28°38’E 55 ,M SCD 79 16.7.59 32°43'S/28°28’E 58 St, Sh HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA SCD 82 SCD 84-85 SCD 94 SCD 96 SCD 1o1 SCD 103 SCD 104 SCD 106 SCD 108 SCD 112 SCD 113 SCD 114 SCD 115 SCD 117-118 SCD 119 SCD 122 SCD 126 SCD 138 SCD 141 SCD 145 SCD 153-154 SCD 169 SCD 175 SCD 179 SCD 184 SCD 191 SCD 206 SCD 219-239 SCD 250 SCD 254 SCD 258 SCD 265 SCD 276 SCD 284 SCD 290 SCD 296-297 SCD 301 SCD 304-305 SCD 320-322 SCD 324 SCD 330 SCD 345 SCD 354 Date 17-7-59 177-59 20.7.59 20.7.59 21.7.59 22.7.59 237-59 237-59 23-7-59 20.7.59 26.11.59 26.11.59 26.11.59 14.2.60 f 14.2.60 ' 14.2.60 3.6.60 28.8.60 28.8.60 28.8.60 25.11.60 24.11.60 30.11.60 24.11.60 25.11.60 29.11.60 30.11.60 29.11.60 30.11.60 16.7.61 TAs 7.0% 14.7.61 14.7.61 6.2.62 6.2.62 6.2.62 6.2.62 8.2.62 9.2.62 9.2.62 1.2.62 12.2;62 11.10.62 Position 33°9°7'S/27°54°7'E 33°3'S/27°55'E 33°55°5/9/25°51'E 34°21'S/25°41’E 34°33'S/24°1’E 35°7'S/22°15’E 34°33'S/21°28’E 34°35'S/21°10’E 34°35'S/21°11’E 33°55°5'9/25°51'E 34°24’S/21°45’E 34°29'S/21°49°5’E 34.°54°49/22°12°2’E 34°24'S/21°46’E 34°33'S/21°52’E 34°40°5'S/22°0’E 34°26°5'S/21°48’E 34°35/S/21°56’E 34°46’S/22°5’E 34°46’S/22°5’E 34°3'S/25°59’E 33°58-9/S/25°41°4’E 34.°20'S/23°31’E 33°58°9'S/25°41°4’E 34°23’S/26°1’E 34°4°3'S/23°25°8’E 34°51'S/23°41’E 34°28 /23°28-4’E 34°48'S/23°39’E 33°7°3'S/28°1E 33°53°8'S/25°42°5’E 33°48'S/25°47'E 33°53 °8'S/25°42°5’E 33°1'S/27°55E 33°4S/27°57’E 33°9'S/28°2’E 33°39'S/27°15’E 34°0'S/25°53’E 34°15/S/25°50°5’E 34°27'S/25°57'E 34°3°5'S/23°23’E 34.°16'S/22°17’E 32°8’S/29°12’E Depth (m.) 51 TB. Material dredged from Table Bay, Cape Town. Bt TB 10 Pea DT TB 12 TB a1 TRA. Material collected by commercial trawlers. TRA 23 TRA 33 TRA 35 Date 11.2.47 11.2.47 25.10.46 11.2.4.7 15.12.57 Date Q.11.47 Position 33°4.7°5'S/18°24°3’E 33°50°5'S/18°25°8’E 33°52'S/18°28’E 33°47°5'S/18°24’E 33°48-6’S/18°24-6’E Position 34°49’S/20°21°5’E 20.7.49 34°55’S/21°10’E 21.1.50 34°34’S/20°50’E Depth (m.) 19-20 27 LB 19-20 15 Depth (m.) C. 91°5 c. gO 70 Bottom br S, Sh R bk M, S Sh R S co S, brk Sh co: 8, Sh, St bk M,S S, 7 Sh gr-gn M co S, Sh R kh § kh § bk M co&fS kh § kh § R R R,khS R co S, brk Sh en M kh S S»R, M Bottom 5, nb, St R S Sh, St St, brk Sh, S Bottom S,R M, S ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Date Position TRA 97 —.7.50 34°30'S/20°50’E TRA 38 -—.7.50 34°30'S/20°56’E TRA 42 —.7.51 34°30'S/20°55’E TRA 56 28.11.52 34°40'S/21°35’E TRA 59 26.11.52 34°28’S/21°45’E TRA. 92 —.1.54 35°3’S/21°50’E TRA 151 6.3.58 34°51'S/19°55’E TRA 156 15.10.58 34°12’S/18°22’E TRA 159 6.7.58 33°56'S/25°36’E WCD. Dredged off west coast. Date Position WCD 1 25.2.59 34°9°8’S/18°16°5’E WCD 7 24.3:59 34°9°3'S/18°17°5’E WCD 12 24.3.59 34°9°4’S/18°16°5’E WCD 18 29-4.59 33°5°6'S/17°54°5'E WCD 30 15.12.59 34°10°5'S/18°14-3’E WCD 34 15.12.59 34°11°2’S/18°20°2’E WCD 56 21.9.60 32°4°6’S/18°18’E WCD 81 15-9.49 34°5'S/18°21’E WCD 100 2.7.61 32°5°5'S/18°17-3'E Acryptolaria conferta (Allman, 1877) Filellum antarcticum (Hartlaub, 1904) Hebella furax Millard, 1957 Hebella scandens (Bale, 1888) Hebella urceolata n. sp. Lafoea fruticosa M. Sars, 1851 1786) Salacia articulata (Pallas, 1766) Salacia disjuncta n. sp. Sertularella africana Stechow, 1919 LIST OF SPECIES Family Lafoeidae Depth (m.) 73 & S$ § DAP Ree PLlrnMAYD “aS aes Q Bottom POD BREW Rw Li = ae Scandia mutabilis (Richie, 1907) Kygophylax africana Stechow, 1923 K.ygophylax armata (Ritchie, 1907) Kygophylax cornucopia Millard, 1955 Kygophylax enigmatica n. sp. Kygophylax sibogae Billard, 1918 Family Synthecitidae Fiincksella cylindrica (Bale, 1888) Synthecium dentigerum Jarvis, 1922 Family Sertulariidae Amphisbetia bidens (Bale, 1884) Amphisbetia minima (Thompson, 1879) Amphisbetia operculata (Linn., 1758) Crateritheca acanthostoma (Bale, 1882) Dictyocladium coactum Stechow, 1923 Diphasia tetraglochina Billard, 1907 Dynamena cornicina McCrady, 1858 Dynamena cristoides Lamx., 1824 Dynamena quadridentata (Ell. & Sol., Synthectum ?elegans Allman, 1872 Synthecium hians Millard, 1957 Sertularella agulhensis n. sp. Sertularella arbuscula (Lamx., 1816) Sertularella capensis Millard, 1957 Sertularella congregata n. sp. Sertularella dubia Billard, 1907 Sertularella falsa Millard, 1957 Sertularella flabellum (Allman, 1886) Sertularella fusiformis (Hincks, 1861) Sertularella gilchristi n. sp. Sertularella goliathus Stechow, 1923 Sertularella mediterranea Hartlaub, 1901 Sertularella megista Stechow, 1923 Sertularella polyzonias (Linn., 1758) HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA y Sertularella pulchra Stechow, 1923 Sertularia turbinata (Lamx., 1816) Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923 Symplectoscyphus arboriformis (Markt., Sertularella xantha Stechow,: 1923 1890) Sertularia distans (Lamx., 1816) Symplectoscyphus macrogonus (‘Treb., 1928) Sertularia marginata (Kirch., 1864) Thyroscyphus aequalis Warren, 1908 Family Lafoeidae Acryptolaria conferta conferta (Allman, 1877) Fig. 1 A-C, E Cryptolaria conferta Allman, 1877: 17, pl 12 (figs. 6-10). Acryptolaria conferta: Totton, 1930: fig. 19a. Leloup, 1937: 29, fig. 19. Records. West coast: AFR 736Y. South Coast: SCD 101G. Description. Colonies reaching a maximum height of 3:9 cm. Stem fascicled except for the terminal branches, but slender and flexible; branching in a roughly alternate manner and roughly in one plane, but on the whole very irregular in appearance. Hydrotheca adnate to stem or branch for over half height; adcauline wall approximately straight and parallel with axis of stem in lower part of adnate section, curving outwards in upper part of adnate section and in free section; abcauline wall usually slightly convex opposite base of adcauline wall, curving evenly outwards beyond this; margin slightly everted. Base of adcauline wall of hydrotheca always above level of top of adnate part of the one below. Diameter at margin approximately 14 to 24 times that at base. Free, solitary hydrothecae also present, arising separately from hydrorhiza or from epizootic stolons creeping over the surface of mature stems. These hydrothecae erect, at right angles to stolon, widening to margin which is slightly everted, quite symmetrical or (more often) somewhat irregular in shape. No coppiniae. Measurements. See under subspecies australis. Remarks. Both these colonies are growing on the surface of worm-tubes, and include stems in various stages of development. Certain observations on the method of growth were thus possible. The hydrorhiza forms a branching reticulum giving off solitary hydrothecae and upright stems. In a young upright stem the first hydrotheca and the hydrocaulus arise separately and side by side from the hydrorhiza (fig. 1C). It appears thus that in the development of the colony a solitary hydrotheca is produced first, and that this is followed by the growth of a separate tube of the hydrorhiza past it, and in contact with it, to become the hydrocaulus of the stem. The development of the rest of the stem proceeds by a method of 8 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM RR Ren Ieee ee ae BEN Se ems Weed Yay | 4 | i Y Va an, VO E G F Fic. 1. Acryptolaria conferta (Allman). . Part of the stem from AFR 736Y, to show branching. Portions of the peripheral tubes in position. Solitary hydrothecae from AFR 736Y. . Solitary hydrotheca and young stem from AFR 736Y, to show origin. . Subsp. australis, solitary hydrothecae from SCD 175N. E.-G. A few hydrothecae from SCD 101G, SCD 101F and SCD 175N respectively. The last two are included in subsp. australis. GOW > HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 9 sympodial growth. At a later stage the superficial tubes are developed as branches from the hydrocaulus arising opposite the top of the adnate part of the hydrothecae, and remaining in communication with it by a series of connexions in this position. Branches arise in the same position as the accessory tubes and are in cytoplasmic continuity with both the coenosarc of the stem and that of the accessory tube. The free hydrothecae which are often present on the surface of older stems appear to belong mostly to young epizootic colonies growing on the surface of older ones. These solitary hydrothecae are similar to those produced by various species of Lafoea (e.g. L. dumosa (Fleming), L. gracillima (Alder) and L. fruticosa M. Sars) and are almost identical with them. They also resemble hydrothecae of the creeping L. tenellula Allman, which is included by some authorities in L. dumosa. It is evident, thus, that extreme care should be taken in assigning such stolonic colonies to a particular species unless the branching form is present as well. For example, the L. tenellula described by Stechow in 1925 (p. 453, fig. 23) was growing on a colony of Acryptolaria humilis Allman and is probably the creeping form of that species. The general appearance of the colonies described above resembles Allman’s figure (pl. 12, fig. 6), and the shape of the hydrotheca resembles that illustrated by Totton (fig. 19a) from Madeira and by Leloup (fig. 19B) from French Indo-China. The measurements are in range of those quoted by most authors. This is the first record of the species from South Africa. Acryptolaria conferta australis Ritchie, 1911 Pig. 1D, FG Cryptolaria conferta var. australis Ritchie, 1911: 826, pl. 84 (fig. 2), pl. 87 (fig. 1). Acryptolaria conferta var. australis: Totton, 1930: 163, fig. 19 c-e. Ralph, 1958: 315, fig. 4 a-g. Records. South coast: AFR 835E. SCD ror1F, 103F, 175N. Description. Several colonies, the largest reaching a height of 11 cm. Stem fascicled, stiff and rather woody; branching alternate and always in one plane; branches variable in length, generally arising next to every third hydrotheca of the stem and often rebranching, those on the same side being separated by a distance of 3-4 mm. Branches often anastomosing. Hydrotheca adnate to stem or branch for over half height; adcauline wall convex throughout; abcauline wall curved gracefully outwards, the curvature being more marked in the distal half. Hydrothecae overlapping, with base of adcauline wall always below level of top of adnate part of the hydrotheca below. Diameter at margin approximately 14 to 2} times that at base. Free hydrothecae also present in SCD 175N, arising from epizootic stolons. No coppiniae. 10 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Measurements (mm.) A. conferta australis A. conferta conferta AFR 835E SCD175N AFR 736Y SCD 101G Hydrotheca, length adcauline, adnate part We oe 9 0°75-0°95 0°67-0°85 0°37-0'49 0°33-0°45 *length adcauline, free part 0'20-0'72 0°27-0°55 0°24-0°55 O*12-0°75 diameter at base .. O'1lI-O0'13 O'II-O'14 0°065-0°10 0:06-0-09 diameter at margin O'19-0'23 0°23-0°26 0°135-0°16 =0°13-0°15, diameter, margin/base 1*54-1°92 1°64-2°18 1°40-2°29 = 167-233, Solitary hydrotheca,+ length .. O°71-1°27 0°43-0°82 0°57=0°61 diameter at margin 0°16-0°20. -O*II5—O°15, =O" 12-015 *Including rejuvenated margins. +Without rejuvenated margins. Remarks. This material shows the distinctive characters of subspecies australis, namely the overlapping hydrothecae and the characteristic thecal shape. It differs markedly from the material which has been assigned to the nominal subspecies in its growth-form, which is stiffer and more regular, and in the measurements of its component parts, which are larger, though the proportions are similar. Neither of the last two characters are necessarily of systematic value, but it is difficult to assess the variability until more material is available. Filellum antarcticum (Hartlaub, 1904) Filellum ?antarcticum: Millard, 1958: 175. Records. South coast: PAFR 835Z. MB 69C. ?SCD 175R. Description. The second sample, growing on a polyzoan, bears the remains of a coppinia in a somewhat dilapidated condition. However, the accessory tubes are clearly visible; they are usually forked at the end (in one case twice), occasionally simply truncated, but never curved as in F. serpens. The other samples bear no coppiniae. Measurements (mm., in MB 690(C). Hydrotheca, length of free part, without reduplications .. diameter at margin 0-18—0-30 ~ ~ O-10—0°12 Remarks. The structure of the accessory coppinial tubes in MB 60C establishes with certainty the presence of this species in South Africa for the first time. The identity of unfertile samples is doubtful. Stechow (1925, p. 458) has reported the presence of the closely related F. serpens in South Africa, but since his specimens were unfertile, these records are also subject to doubt. Hebella furax Millard, 1957 Fig. 2B—D Hebella furax Millard, 1957: 200, fig. 8. Records. South coast: MB 15B, 24T, 26E, 39W, 47K, 72G. SAMH 256, gor. SCD 37U, 84Z, 117R, 179B. Description. Colonies epizootic on Lytocarpus filamentosus (Lamarck), Thecocarpus HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA II formosus (Busk) and T. flexuosus solidus Millard. Very few parasitic hydrothecae present among these samples. Hydrothecae similar to those previously described, though a few are a little shorter and thus the proportion of length/diameter is less. Gonothecae (described for the first time) borne on hydrorhiza, not sharply demarcated from pedicel, widening towards distal end, often curved towards one side, with smooth or slightly corrugated walls. Pedicel with 2-5 spiral annulations. Containing several medusa-buds in various stages of development. The young gonotheca is closed distally by a slightly convex operculum, which tends to crumple in microscopic preparations, but has no valves. In the ripe gonotheca the operculum is absent and the margin usually everted. Oldest medusa about 0-4 mm. deep and 0:25 mm. wide, with at least 2 long, spirally coiled, marginal tentacles and a 4-lipped mouth. Length of gonotheca, including pedicel a ie .. 1°64-2°52 mm. maximum diameter ne es vie sis .. 0°50-0°81 mm. Remarks. The examination of numerous samples of this species shows that the epizootic form is far more common than the parasitic one. It is possible that H. furax is conspecific with H. parasitica (Ciamician), but the gonophores of the latter have not so far been described. Hebella scandens (Bale, 1888) Hebella scandens: Millard, 1957: 202. Millard, 1958: 176. Vervoort, 1959: 237, fig. 12. Hebella calcarata: Ralph, 1958: 306, fig. 1 a-s. Records. West coast: WCD 18V, 34K. South coast: MB 8M, 64M. SAMH 183, Seine 2og, 402. oC) 377, 5271, 75F; 79Q, 84Y, 108H, 118L, 154J, 175M, i7on. TRA 92R, 151H. Hebella urceolata n. sp. Fig, 2A Holotype: SCD 154H (South African Museum registered number, SAMH 410). Description. Colony epizootic on Halecium beani (Johnston). Hydrorhiza unseg- mented, giving rise to hydrothecal pedicels at irregular intervals. Hydrotheca about three times as long as wide, distinctly demarcated from pedicel, gibbous below and narrowing above to just below margin. Margin smooth, everted, straight or slightly oblique, sometimes rejuvenated. Pedicel short, not annulated, widening distally. Hydrotheca separated from pedicel by an annular thickening of the wall, to the distal region of which is affixed a delicate diaphragm. : Most hydrothecae show a tendency to be asymmetrical with the margin more strongly everted and the basal region more gibbous on the surface directed towards the distal end of the host colony, while the annular thecal thickening is more strongly developed on the opposite side. Gonophores absent. L2 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM nd Fic. 2. Hebella spp. A. Hebella urceolata n. sp. Various hydrothecae from the holotype. B.-D. Hebella furax Millard. B and C, gonothecae containing young medusae from SCD 84Z. D, a young gonotheca and a hydrotheca from MB 72G. . HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 13 Measurements (mm..) Hydrorhiza, diameter Hy wi ms “4 uy ie 0*07-0'10 Pedicel, height, to diaphragm e ie 3 ts 4 O‘II-O'17 Hydrotheca, height, from diaphragm __... i 'p og 0:81-0'93 diameter, near base _.. se ee ns 7 2 0*31-0°35 diameter, at margin .. Li 4 bes a5 a 0'25-0'33 Lafoea fruticosa M. Sars, 1851 Fig. 3 Lafoea fruticosa: Allman, 1888: 34, pl. 16 (fig. 2, 2a). Broch, 1918: 12. Stechow, 1925: 456, fig. 24B. Totton, 1930: 157, fig. 13. Fraser, 1944: 223, pl. 46 (fig. 206). Vervoort, 1946: 201, fig. 83 c, d. Records. West coast: WCD 1L. South coast: SOD 175Q. Description. Branching colonies reaching a maximum height of 9:0 cm. Stems fascicled, branching mainly in one plane but growing together in clusters and anastomosing with each other to produce a shrubby effect. Hydrothecae arising from all sides of the stem and branches, forming an angle of about 40-60° with branch. Asymmetrical in shape, generally with a double curvature on the adcauline side and a more or less straight abcauline wall. Margin slightly everted. Pedicel short and slightly twisted. An epizootic colony present on the surface of WCD IL, giving rise to upright stems and solitary hydrothecae. The latter generally more slender and with thinner perisarc than those borne by upright stems. Coppinia present in WCD IL, consisting of closely packed, more-or-less hexagonal gonothecae surmounted by acrocysts, which are loosely attached and come away easily on handling. Gonotheca approximately 0-4 mm. in height and 0-15 mm. in diameter at the shoulder, with a short mouth-funnel of approximately 0-05 mm. in height and 0-05 mm. in diameter at the everted margin. Tubular hydrothecae long (well over 3 mm.) and much coiled. Measurements (mm.) WCD 1L SCD 175Q Pedicel, height . . 5. rie & ne .. O'I0-O'IQ O'14-0°22 Hydrotheca, height .. oi 2s .. 0'42-0°66 0°34-0°59 Pedicel + hydrotheca, heey - .. 0°52-0:77 0:46—0°77 Hydrotheca, diameter at margin... a .. OtI4-O'19 O°14-0°16 Height of hydrotheca + pedicel diameter at margin eos lo SAS aa Hydrotheca height/pedicel height .. +) .. 2:63-6:00 1°55-3°28 Solitary hydrotheca + pedicel, eae: ty ~« .O*41-0"73 diameter at margin * 2 .: | O*I0-O°14 Remarks. It was difficult to assign this material to a species, as it has features which resemble both L. fruticosa and L. dumosa. It has been assigned to the former partly because of the appearance of the coppinia, which resembles that illus- 14 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 0-S5 mm. B+C Fic. 3. Lafoea fruticosa M. Sars. A. Part of a fascicled stem, to show branching. B and C. Hydrothecae. D. An epizootic colony with solitary hydrothecae and an upright stem growing on the surface of an older colony. E. Part of a section through a coppinia, showing gonothecae (one with an acrocyst) and tubular hydrothecae. _ F. Surface view of part of a coppinia. (A and B from SCD 175Q, C-F from WCD 1L.) HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA I5 trated by Fraser and Vervoort, and partly because of the shape of the hydrotheca, which resembles more that illustrated by Stechow, who has described both species from South Africa. The shape and proportions of the hydrotheca are intermediate between those described and illustrated by Totton for L. dumosa and L. fruticosa. Since the branches arise from the accessory tubes in this species it is often difficult to distinguish epizootic colonies from the accessory tubes and branches. However, the accessory tubes always run strictly parallel to the axial tube and are in cytoplasmic connexion with the coenosarc of the latter, whereas the epizootic hydrorhiza wanders at will over the surface of the stem, with which it has no communication, and gives off both upright stems and solitary hydrothecae. Scandia mutabilis (Ritchie, 1907) Scandia mutabilis: Millard, 1957: 202. Millard, 1958: 176. Records. South coast: KNY 30U. Kygophylax africana Stechow, 1923 Fig. 4A—F Kygophylax africana: Stechow, 1925: 445, fig. 18. Records. West coast: AFR 743H. South Coast: SAMH 321. Description. Hydrorhiza growing over the surface of worm-tubes, bearing nematothecae, solitary hydrothecae and upright stems in all stages of develop- ment, the latter reaching a maximum height of 9-5 cm. Stem and main branches thickly fascicled with some of the accompanying tubes extending on to the basal part of practically all the smaller branches. Stem bearing alternate hydrothecae and alternate branches given off at the base of every third and fourth hydrotheca. Branches often rebranching in the same manner, or according to a different scheme in which subbranches arise at the base of every third hydrotheca alternately to the right and the left. The hydrotheca at the origin of each branch is not strictly in the axil but shifted slightly onto the branch itself. All branches in one plane, many of the larger ones anastomosing with other parts of the colony. Smaller branches (Stechow’s ‘cladia’) unsegmented, but often with one or two corrugations close to the base; bearing alternate hydrothecae, of which the two rows are in one plane. Hydrothecal pedicel short (and covered by the accompanying tubes on the thick part of the stem), sometimes witha distinct indentation on the adcauline side. Hydrotheca long, tubular, curved away from branch, of equal diameter throughout from just above the level of the diaphragm (SAMH 321, fig. 4F), or widening slightly towards margin (AFR 743H, fig. 4E). Margin slightly everted. Hydrotheca set at a varying angle to stem or branch—the angle may be as large as 50° (more common in AFR 743H), or very small so that the 16 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM adcauline wall is almost in contact with the axial tube (more common in SAMH 321). Diaphragm in form of annular thickening, set obliquely, with adcauline side lower than abcauline. Nematotheca tubular and of equal diameter throughout, borne on a very short and narrow pedicel, and separated from it by a delicate diaphragm. Nematothecae borne irregularly on the peripheral tubes of the stem, and one on the base of each hydrothecal pedicel. The nematotheca of the first hydro- theca of a branch, however, is situated on the branch itself immediately beyond the hydrotheca instead of on its pedicel. Both hydrothecae and nemato- thecae often with reduplicated margins. Coppiniae present around the stem and larger branches, and also borne on the substratum by the hydrorhiza, reaching about 10 mm. in length and 4 mm. in diameter. Consisting of adpressed gonothecae (about 9-12 visible in cross-section), and numerous branching nematophores. Gonotheca penta- gonal or hexagonal in surface view; in lateral view widening from base to top of adpressed part, bearing a free tubular neck surmounted by 2 divergent sharply pointed horns. Each with 2 apertures situated on opposite sides of the distal end of the neck immediately below the horns. Male and female gonothecae borne in separate coppiniae, but exactly the same in appearance, female containing a cluster of planula larvae. Nematothecae borne on branching perisarcal tubes which arise from the peripheral tubes of the stem and penetrate between the gonothecae, continuing beyond them to reach a total height of 14 to 24 mm. Solitary hydrothecae borne by hydrorhiza and also by young epizootic colonies growing on the surface of the larger ones. Usually smaller than normal hydrothecae and with longer pedicels. Shape variable; quite symmetrical and straight, irregular, or curved as in the normal type. Measurements (ram., without reduplications) AFR 743H SAMH 321 Final branches, distance between two hydrothecae .. 0°34—-0-48 0-21—0°38 diameter, above hydrotheca at s .. 0'05-0°0Q 0-05—0-07 Pedicel, length adcauline va ee Me .. 0'03-0°095 0:02-0:05 Hydrotheca, length adcauline .. the oe .. 0:'26-0°33 0°24-0°30 length abcauline .. Si ue we .. 0°23-0°90) Q71G—0-25 diameter at mouth Bs ae bi .. 0*'09-0°10 0:07-0:08 diameter across diaphragm bs a .. 0'04-0:06 0:05-0:07 Nematotheca, length, including pedicel fi .. 0°07-O'12 0:0Q—0°17 diameter at margin of es Mm .. 0'025—-0°04 0°02—0°025 Remarks. Although there are slight differences in the appearance of the hydrothe- cae in these two colonies (e.g. the hydrothecae in SAMH 321 have narrower mouths and shorter pedicels and are more closely set than those in AFR 743H) I can see no reason for specific distinction. Both bear coppiniae (male in SAMH 321, female in AFR 743H) which are exactly alike in construction. Although the branching in general conforms to the scheme outlined above, i HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA E Fic. 4. Zygophylax spp. AF. LAM g30L (young colony). South coast: SAMH 186, 252, 282. SCD 79J, 82L, 85C, 108G, 112C, 320K. Description. A number of colonies, all (except LAM 30L, which is unbranched) with stiff, fascicled stems branching in one plane and in a pinnate manner. Hydrothecae rather variable in structure and appearance—some are comparatively short and fat with well-marked abcauline thickenings as illustrated by Billard, 1907, fig. 3 and Millard, 1958, fig. 7A; others are more slender with distinct corrugations on the adcauline wall and poorly developed abcauline thickenings; and still others show a tendency for an elongation of the abcauline marginal tooth so that the margin becomes tilted towards the adcauline side. Internal bydrothecal teeth never present. Gonotheca (not previously described) distinctly annulated in distal region, with a short terminal neck bearing 2—7 small spines (usually 5-6). Arising opposite the base of a hydrotheca. All female where the sex could be definitely ascertained. One colony (part of SCD 112C) with practically smooth gonothecae (possibly male). Measurements (mm., excluding LAM 30L, which is a doubtful record) Internode length + as is ee ny ss .. 0*40-0°72 diameter across node .. 18 - ae i .. 0*20-0°39 42 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Hydrotheca, length abcauline ie Ae * a .. 0°48-0°65 length adcauline, adnate part .. ye Be a ». 0°32-0°53 length adcauline, free part th a T ». O°31-0°46 adnate part/adcauline length .. ie) ue ee »» 0°45-0°58 diameter at mouth a ch pa mp te .. 0'22—0°30 maximum diameter... a Me Pa ae .. O'31-0°43 Gonotheca, length .. se side es, My its .. 2°67-3°94 maximum diameter... i oh ref 14 -. 1°06—1-48 Remarks. The variability of the shape of the hydrotheca in this species has been the cause of some hesitation in identification, and there appear to be 3 common forms: (i) the short, fat hydrotheca with the margin tilted towards the abcauline side and a well-developed abcauline thickening, as originally, described (fig.. 14A, B), (ii) a longer hydrotheca with thinner perisarc and distinct adcauline corrugations (fig. 14C), and (iii) a hydrotheca with the margin tilted towards the adcauline side due to elongation of the abcauline marginal tooth (fig. 14F). These forms cannot be separated as distinct species or subspecies, as inter- grading forms occur, and specimens in the same sample may vary from form (i) to form (ii), or from form (ii) to form (i). The macroscopic appearance of the colony and the structure of the gonotheca is identical in all cases. All the specimens described have greater dimensions than those quoted by Billard, 1907, for the nominate subspecies, and can thus be included in the subspecies magna. So far no overlap has been observed. The form with adcauline thecal corrugations shows resemblances to S. gayi var. robusta Allman, 1874, but the gonothecae are different (those of S. gayt possessing a bilabiate aperture) and the measurements are not so great as those quoted by Billard in 1906 (p. 185) for var. robusta. Some of the specimens also show resemblances to S. crassicaulis (Heller), but the latter species has a dichotomously branched stem. Sertularella falsa Millard, 1957 Sertularella ?tumida: Day, Millard & Harrison, 1952: 404 (listed). Sertularella falsa Millard, 1957: 211, figs. 1oF, 11D. Records. South coast: KNY 70F (reported by Day e¢ al. 1952). Sertularella flabellum (Allman, 1886) Sertularella flabellum: Millard, 1957: 212, figs. 1oG, 11G. Millard, 1958: 190. Records. West coast: TB 21D. WCD 12B. South coast: MB 47U. SAMH 171, 178, 205, 217, 263, 312. SCD 5B, 29M, 36Y, 52Q, 56S, 85E, 106P, 112B, 1535, 175J, 206N, 265K, 2908, 320J. TRA 595, 92P, 151J. Sertularella fusiformis (Hincks, 1861) Sertularella ellisii f. ellisti: Picard, 1956: 264, fig. 3d, e. Sertularella fusiformis: Millard, 1957: 213, figs. 1oC—D, 11E. a? HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 43 Fic. 14. Sertularella dubia magna Millard. A.-D., F. Hydrothecae from various colonies to show variation in shape E. Gonotheca. (A from PF 12308H (False Bay), B from SAMH 252, C and E from SAMH 282, D from SCD 112C, F from SCD 85C.) se a a ee eek PE 44 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Records. West coast: B 105, 114B. CP 336B. PP 1S, 4M. South coast: MB 24W. SAMH 231, 271. SCD 37F, 61E, 75E. Remarks. Picard in 1956 has included S. fusiformis in SS. ellisiz, but does not seem to have considered the question of the number and position of internal hydro- thecal teeth. In his diagrams he shows internal teeth situated immediately below the marginal teeth, which is certainly not the case in South African material allocated to S. fusiformis, where internal teeth alternate with the marginal teeth. Stechow, 1923c, described S. ellisiz as possessing 3 small internal teeth (thus differing from S. mediterranea where the teeth are large), and until more work has been done on the variability of this character. I prefer to retain S. fusiformis as a separate species. The number of internal teeth in the latter is known to be variable, but as has been pointed out before (Millard, 1957, p. 214; 1958, p. 187) the position in South African material at any rate is constant, and differs from that in S. ellzszz. Sertularella gilchristt nov. sp. Fig, 1ak, (Gib Types and Records. Holotype: SCD 85J (South African Museum registered number SAMH 416). Other records: SCD 153X. Both from south coast. Description of holotype. Stem thick, fascicled, reaching 5-0 cm. in height, branch- ing and rebranching profusely in an irregular pinnate fashion, but not necessarily in one plane. General effect bushy. ‘Terminal branches not geniculate, with distinct oblique nodes and sometimes an annulation above each node. Inter- nodes of variable length, each with one hydrotheca. Hydrotheca swollen below and narrowing very markedly to margin; adnate for a little less than half adcauline height; symmetrical, or (more commonly) bent outwards with margin tilted towards abcauline side; annu- lated, with 3 or more annulations passing all round hydrotheca or (less commonly) with annulations indistinct or confined to adcauline surface. Margin with 4 teeth, of which the abcauline one may project slightly more than the others. 3 well-developed internal teeth, 1 abcauline and 2 latero-adcauline. Gonotheca fusiform, annulated in distal region, with 3 or 4 spines at the distal end of the slender terminal region. Measurements (mm.) Holotype SCD 153X Internode length ne pa at ate .. 0°28-0°45 0°39-0°53 diameter across node A ee =i .. 0719-05225 eres Hydrotheca, length abcauline .. - sie .. 0°33-0°41 0°36-0-41 length adcauline, adnate part... sa .. 0°22-0-27) 0-22-37 length adcauline, free part mt ay .. 0'24-0'34 0:26-0°35 adnate part/adcauline length .. oh .. 0'40-0:48 0°40—0°49 diameter at mouth ae sis be .. O'II-O'14 O°12-0°13 maximum diameter Ec, “fh ee .. Q°2I-0'24. 0°22-0°25 Gonotheca, length oo a ay oN .. 1°84-1-86 maximum diameter aa a he Hd 0:97 HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 45 Remarks. This species shows strong resemblances to S. robusta Coughtrey, 1875 (see Trebilcock, 1928: 16, and Ralph, 1961: 824), but differs from it in the fascicled and freely branching stem, and also to a lesser extent in the shape of the hydrotheca which has a decidedly narrower mouth. Sertularella goliathus Stechow, 1923 Sertularella goliathus: Millard, 1957: 215, figs. 10A, 11A. Records. West coast: WCD 7P. South coast: SCD 106Q. TRA 37N. Sertularella mediterranea mediterranea Hartlaub, 1901 Sertularella mediterranea: Millard, 1957: 215, figs. 1oE, 11B. Hamond, 1957: 316, fig. 24. Millard, 1958: 190. Vervoort, 1959: 272, fig. 33a. Sertularella ?gaudichaudi: Day, Millard & Harrison, 1952: 404 (listed). Sertularella ellisii f. mediterranea: Picard, 1956: 264, fig. 3b. Records. South coast: A 123, 384B. KNY 57J (recorded by Day et al. 1952). SAMH 206. Sertularella mediterranea asymmetrica Millard, 1958 Sertularella mediterranea Hartlaub var. asymmetrica Millard, 1958: 191, fig. 7B. Records. South coast: CPR gD. SAMH 270. SCD 60Y. Sertularella megista Stechow, 1923 Sertularella polyzonias f. robusta Kirchenpauer, 1884: 38. Sertularella polyzonias var. robusta: Hartlaub, 1901: 88, pl. 5 (fig. 1). Stechow, 1925: 479. Sertularella megista: Stechow, 1925: 480, fig. 36. Millard, 1957: 217, figs. 10L, 11J. Records. West coast: WCD 12A, 56L. South coast: AFR 945M. MB 47V, 52H, 64J. SAMH 181, 246, 310, 316. SCD 5D, 37E, 52R, 85F, 96C, 108E, 153T, 175K, 239C, 254R, 265C, 290R, 320]. Description. Numerous colonies from all round the coast, the tallest reaching a height of 10:3 cm. Most colonies are unfascicled and sparsely branched, and individual stems may reach a length of over 7 cm. without branching. Only the sturdiest colonies are fascicled, and these only to a small extent and in the basal region. The stems, thus, usually have a flexuous appearance, surprisingly so for a species with so thick a perisarc. With the abundant material available it is apparent that there is great variation in length of internode and size of hydrotheca. New measurements are thus included to illustrate the range of variation in the species. The hydrotheca is characterized by a sharp bend in the adcauline wall at the point where it separates from the stem, but the angle of the margin is influenced by the amount of bending and the length of the abcauline marginal tooth, which may be produced. Normally the margin is perpendicular to the axis, but when the bend is marked (and the angle within the hydrotheca lies between 110° and 120°) it is tilted towards the abcauline side, and when the 46 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM bend is less marked (with the internal angle over 125°) and the abcauline tooth produced it is tilted towards the adcauline side. Measurements (mm., complete range, including False Bay material described in 1957). Internode length by ue a om ws x ». O°7I-1°52 diameter across node .. My 4 si if: .. 0*40-0°82 Hydrotheca, length abcauline rae ay ws ea .. 0°80-1-28 length adcauline, adnate part ie + 4 .. 0°67-1-08 length adcauline,'free‘part — . . am ay: a .. 0°34-0°72 adnate part/adcauline length .. ae i My ». O°55-0°71 diameter at mouth ys iy ae Be i! .. 0°33-0'52 maximum diameter bay ie ne bs Pe .. 0°47-0°72 Mature gonotheca, length .. et Mg S a ve, | Rees maximum diameter... “te = ie Rs .. 0°85-1-90 Remarks. 1 have included in the synonymy of this species Kirchenpauer’s material of S. polyzonias f. robusta from the Cape of Good Hope. Kirchenpauer’s type material unfortunately no longer exists, but was examined and illustrated by Hartlaub in 1901, and I agree with the latter author that it should be removed from S. polyzonias. The hydrotheca has the typical angle in the adcauline wall characteristic of S. megista, and the size is within range. Sertularella polyzonias (Linn., 1758) Sertularella polyzonias: Millard, 1957: 217, figs. 10J, 11H. Millard, 1958: 191. Millard, 1961: 205. Records. West coast: TB 10, 12A, 21G. South Coast: MB 47W. SAMH 175. SCD 37J, 85G, 112D, 153W, 175L. Sertularella pulchra Stechow, 1923 Fig. 13E-G Sertularella pulchra Stechow, 1923b: 113. Stechow, 1925: 485, fig. 39. Records. South coast: SAMH 219, 313. SCD 37H, 154L, 296]. Description. Fascicled stems reaching a maximum height of 4-8 cm. and bearing alternate hydrocladia, which are usually very regular in arrangement, one arising below the base of every third hydrotheca. The 2 rows of hydrocladia in one plane. Hydrothecae generally as described by Stechow, though in most colonies a few of the hydrothecae are bent gently away from the stem, with the adcauline wall slightly convex and the abcauline wall slightly concave (fig. 13 F). Asa result the margin is perpendicular to the axis or tilted towards the abcauline side. Adcauline striations very obvious, and only rarely absent. 4 internal teeth, alternating with the marginal teeth, sometimes incomplete in young parts of the colony. Gonothecae of 2 types. Empty ones, presumably male, as described by HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA Stechow, with narrow distal end and 4 marginal spines. Female similar, but with wider distal end and 5-6 short marginal spines (fig. 13 E). Stechow’s material from Measurements (mm.) Stmon’s Bay Internode length .. 0°43-0°82 0°49—-0°63 diameter across node 0°20-0°42 0:16-0:34 Hydrotheca, length abcauline 0:58-0°78 0:5 8-0°72 length adcauline, adnate part 0:32-0°46 0:35-0'44 length adcauline, free part .. 0°36-0°46 0°39-0°56 adnate part/adcauline length 0°44-0°55 0'40-0°53 diameter at mouth .. 0°21-0°28 =: 0:21-0:28 maximum diameter 0:29-0'38 0°31-0:36 Gonotheca, length 2°95-3°42 2°33-29 84 maximum diameter 0-99-1°63 =: 0'93-1 31 Remarks. 1 have seen two mounted slides of Stechow’s material from Simon’s Bay (loaned by the Munich Museum) which confirm the identity of this material. Measurements taken from Stechow’s material are included above for comparison. Stechow includes in S. pulchra part of Warren’s material described under the name of S. tumida (material from Park Rynie, 1908 fig. 6B). With this I do not agree, as Warren shows no striations on the hydrothecae and only 3 internal teeth. His material can probably be included in S. arbuscula. Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923 Fig. 15 Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923: 10. Stechow, 1925: 470, fig. 30. Records. South coast: LIZ 7Z. MB64K. SCD 85H. Description. Stems reaching a maximum height of 1-1 cm., usually unbranched, but occasionally giving off 1 or 2 small branches which arise immediately below a hydrotheca. Details of structure and measurements as described by Stechow. _ Gonotheca (not previously described) arising from stem opposite the base of a hydrotheca, annulated throughout, or with annulations becoming indistinct in basal third. Margin with 3 or 4 minute spines. Female with external marsupium. Present Stechow’s Measurements (mm.) material — material Internode length hs : is AN .. 0°30-0:76 0°45-0°77 diameter across node wi sm oF .. O°10-0'16 O-10—-0°15 Hydrotheca, length abcauline .. on Me .. 0°36-0°48 0°41-0°47 length adcauline, adnate part .. ah .. 0*20-0'26 0:21-0:26 48 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM length adcauline, free part oe SPARES .. 0°18-0'31 0°25-0°34 adnate part/adcauline length Se .. 0°39-0°56 0°40-0°49 diameter at mouth 3% ve i .. O*15-O°21 O*17-0'23 maximum diameter oe A hy .. 0°23-0°30 0:23-0°30 Gonotheca, length A ay Ab Ry) .. 1°35-1°79 maximum diameter As S As .. 0°86-0°95 Remarks. The identity of this material was confirmed by comparison with a mounted slide of Stechow’s material from the Agulhas Bank, kindly loaned by the Munich Museum. The measurements of the latter are included above for comparison. fpr eee a TNT Fic. 15. Sertularella striata Stechow. A. and C. Hydrothecae from different colonies. B. The gonotheca. - (A and B from SCD 85H, C from LIZ 7Z.) The species shows variability in the length of internode, which may be shorter or longer than that illustrated by Stechow; in the degree of annulation on the hydrothecal walls, which may be less marked; in the proportion of the adcauline thecal wall adnate to the stem; and in the angle of the thecal margin. The latter may be perpendicular to the axis as illustrated by Stechow, but may also be tilted towards the adcauline side. This is the case in some of the hydrothecae on Stechow’s slide, and in most of the hydrothecae in the present material. This species is closely related to S. africana, differing from it in the greater number of more distinct annulations which extend over the full length of the hydrotheca. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 49 Sertularella xantha Stechow, 1923 Sertularella xantha: Millard, 1957: 218, figs. 1oK, 111. Records. West coast: TB 12B. WCD 30U. South coast: SAMH 146, 154, 220, 325, 334, 348. SCD 33C, 103E, 104E, 108F, 113F, 114F, 115N, 122W, 126K, 141J, 145B, 184Q, 191R, 219W, 239D, 258P, 276T, 290Q, 322G, 324], 345A. TRA 33L, 35A, 38B, 42E, 56V, 92T. Sertularia distans gracilis Hassall, 1848 Sertularia heterodonta Ritchie, 1909: 79, fig. 4. Jarvis, 1922: 339. Sertularia distans var. gracilis: Billard, 1925: 175, fig. 33. Leloup, 1935: 47, figs. 28, 29. Millard, 1957: 221, fig. 12. Millard, 1958: 193. Pennycuik, 1959: 197. Records. South coast: BRE 60R. CPR 7C. LIZ 13E. MB 24R. SAMH 266. SCD 37Y, 50M, 85Q, 112E. Description. A number of colonies, none taller than 0-8 cm., all with unbranched stems, except in a few instances where side-branches arise from within hydrothe- cae. Distance between consecutive pairs of hydrothecae very variable, and internodes sometimes very long and slender, as illustrated by Ritchie, 1909, for S. heterodonta. Interna) pegs of perisarc in lower part of hydrotheca very charac- teristic, and internal teeth in distal region below margin also common—I abcauline (fairly common), or 1 abcauline and 2 latero-adcauline (more rare and in occasional hydrothecae only). Gonothecae present in 2 colonies, as illustrated by Leloup, 1935; female with external marsupium. Remarks. Examination of Ritchie’s type material of S. heterodonta (on loan to the British Museum) showed that this species is distinguished from the common form of S. distans gracilis only by the presence of 3 internal hydrothecal teeth, longer and more slender internodes, and slightly smaller hydrothecae. The last 2 characters can be attributed to variations in growth-form which are paralleled in the South African material. The presence of a single abcauline internal tooth has been reported in S. distans gracilis by a number of authors, and the presence of 2 extra latero-adcauline internal teeth (which were not present in all the hydrothecae of the type material) is here reported in South Africa. I therefore include S. heterodonta Ritchie as a synonym for S. distans gracilis. Sertularia marginata (Kirch., 1864) Sertularia marginata: Millard, 1957: 224, fig. 13. Ralph, 1961: 785, fig. 12a-g (synonymy). Records. South coast: SCD 305D. Description. A young colony consisting of 5 stems reaching a maximum height of 0-6 cm., of which one bears 1 branch, another 2, and the rest are simple. Sertularia turbinata (Lamx., 1816) Sertularia loculosa: Bale, 1884: pl. 4 (figs. 5, 6), pl. 9 (fig. 12), pl. 19 (fig. 9). Bale, 1913: 121, pl. 12 (figs. 7, 8). Warren, 1908: 306, fig. 8. Jarvis, 1922: 340. 50 | ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Sertularia brevicyathus : Nutting, 1904: 60, pl. 6 (figs. 1, 2). Jarvis, 1920: 338, pl. 24 (fig. 6). Tridentata acuta Stechow, 1921: 231. Stechow, 1923c: 207. Sertularia turbinata: Billard, 1925: 177, fig. 34. Millard, 1958: 197, fig. 8B. Vervoort, 1959: 275; figs. 35, 36. Sertularia restricta Totton, 1930: 205. Sertularia acuta: Millard, 1958: 192, figs. 8A, F. Records. South coast: MB 58E. ‘SCD 85S. Description. Two small colonies reaching a maximum height of 0-7 cm. One of them (MB 58E) is an old colony with thick perisarc and smoothly worn hydro- thecal margins; the whole surface is thickly overgrown with epiphytes. In both colonies the nodes tend to be indistinct, particularly near the proximal end of a stem. Kemarks. Up to the present time S. acuta (Stechow) has been held to be separate from §. turbinata (Lamx.), although Billard (1925: 178), was dubious about the matter, remarking that the former species differs from the latter only in the shorter internodes, and in the shorter hydrothecae which narrow more abruptly to the margin. The two samples in this collection are intermediate between the material of S. acuta and S. turbinata previously described (Millard, 1958) in internode length and abcauline thecal length, and the 4 samples together form a perfect gradation from one extreme to the other. It is thus no longer possible to keep the two species separate, and S. acuta must be considered as a somewhat stunted growth-form of S. turbinata. Selected measurements (in mm.) of the 4 samples are included for comparison: Fydrotheca, Hydrotheca, Internode length diameter at length abcauline margin RHB 52C 0°39-0'54. 0°16—-0:21 0°09—-0'12 SCD 85S 0°52—0:62 O°19Q—0:22 0°0Q—-0'II MB 58E 0°55-0°76 0°22-0'32 0°13—0°16 PZ 13B 0:66-0:85 0'25-0°31 O°12—-0-17 In all 4 samples the hydrotheca is very similar in appearance, and grades evenly from the form illustrated for S. acuta (Millard, 1958: fig. 8A) to that of S. turbinata (Millard, 1958: fig. 8B). The gonothecae of S$. turbinata have now been described by Vervoort (1959: fig. 36 b, c) and are exactly similar to those of S. acuta (Millard, 1958: fig. 8F; Warren, 1908: fig. 8D), except for the presence of 2 minute distal spines in the former. It was previously thought (Millard, 1958: 198) that the nature of the nodes was a distinguishing character between S. acuta (straight) and S. turbinata (oblique). But the new materia] has shown that this is a variable character and the nodes may be straight, oblique or invisible, and further that both straight and oblique nodes may occur on the same stem. This is discounting the hinge-joints, which always form the termination of an extra athecate internode and which occur quite irregularly. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA pal S. turbinata is closely related to S. ligulata Thornely, and the difference between them is largely one of shape, which is obvious to the eye, but which is not shown up at all clearly by the measurements, due mainly to the tendency for variation between the proximal and distal regions of a stem in both species. In S. ligulata the members of a pair of hydrothecae are more erect and tend to diverge at a higher level than in S. turbinata. As a result the hydrothecae of the former are in general contiguous and adnate for a greater length, and the maximum diameter across a pair tends to be less. S. ligulata also has a slightly wider thecal mouth and lower marginal teeth (Millard, 1958: figs. 8B, 9A, B). If these 2 species are to be kept separate, the presence of a ligula in S. ligulata cannot be used as a specific character, as it is also clearly evident in a mounted specimen of S. turbinata (MB 58E). As a rule specimens are not sufficiently well preserved to determine the presence or absence of this character. Symplectoscyphus arboriformis (Markt., 1890) Sertularella arboriformis Marktanner-Turneretscher, 1890: 228, pl. 4 (fig. 5). Stechow, 1912: 358, fig. C. Records. West coast: SAMH 409. WCD 81L. South coast: SAMH 156, 172, 184, Se7eett, 17. oGD 5C, 37D, 61C, 75C, 138K, 290T. TRA 92Q. Description. Colonies reaching a maximum height of 11-0 cm., some with gonothecae. Structure agreeing perfectly with Marktanner’s description. Stechow’ s Measurements (mm.) material Internode length 6 As, ti oe .. 0:60-0:80 0:°51-0°78 diameter across node Ry ae Wf .. O°17-0°33 O*1Q-0°42 Hydrotheca, length abcauline .. ¥ - .. 0'34-0'47 0:°46-0-63 length adcauline, adnate part... fis .. O°38I-0°40 0-28-0°43 length adcauline, free part ne ie .. 0°38-0°46 0°35-0°50 adnate part/adcauline length .... aN .. 0°42-0°51 0°36-0°53 diameter at mouth a ie be .. 0°28-0'38 0°25-0°35 Gonotheca, length Ne Sah we i, .. 1°35-1°92 1°46-1°75 maximum. diameter acs is ve .. 0°71-0:96 0-81—0-96 Remarks. ‘Two slides of Stechow’s material from Algoa Bay were examined by courtesy of the Munich Museum. The measurements are included above for comparison. Symplectoscyphus macrogonus (Treb., 1928) Sertularella macrogona Trebilcock, 1928: 11, pl. 1 (fig. 4). Symplectoscyphus macrogonus: Millard, 1957: 219. Ralph, 1961: 708, fig. 14 a, b. Records. West coast: BB 13P. CP 379, 650B. LAM eG, 7M, oT, 13], 145, 18L, 23M, 30K, 35K, 40P, 41G, 46M, 59B. PP 1U. SB 150D, 161Y, 194L, 253D. TB 11, 21F. WCD 81J, tooT. South coast: BMR 23N. SAMH 265. SCD 179C. 52 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Thyroscyphus aequalis Warren, 1908 Fig. 16 Thyroscyphus ramosus: Billard, 1907: 342. Thyroscyphus aequalis Warren, 1908: 344, pl. 48 (figs. 38-40), fig. 23. Jarvis, 1922: 337. Millard, 1958: 199. Thyroscyphus regularis : Ritchie, 1910: 811, pl. 77 (fig. 7). Jaderholm, 1923: 5. Stechow, 1925: 463. Cnidoscyphus aequalis: Splettstésser, 1929: 82, 124, figs. 78-82. Kramp, 1947: 13. kecords. South coast: SAMH 173, 251, 268, 350, 379. SCD 2oL, 37A, 61D, 79L, 84J, 94F, 117J, 153R, 169X, 2548, 265D. TRA 23B, 35D, 38D, 56T, g2A. Description. Numerous samples, some consisting of a few fragments only, the largest reaching 40 cm. in height. Stem weakly fascicled at base in larger colonies only, branching in an irregularly alternate manner. Nodes distinct or only faintly indicated. Hydrotheca-bearing apophysis without basal septum. Hydrothecal pedicel about half width of apophysis, spirally annulated to a varying degree, often regenerated. Hydrotheca of rather variable shape and size, usually expanding to margin and practically symmetrical, but often with narrower mouth and slightly bulging adcauline wall. Margin with 4 teeth and perisarcal thickening below edge. Diaphragm in form of annular thickening of perisarc, which is better developed on adcauline side and often invisible on abcauline side. An internal ridge of perisarc sometimes present about one-third of height of hydrotheca for attachment of annular fold of hydranth. Two batteries of large rod-shaped nematocysts present in ectodermal lining of hydrotheca in adcauline and abcauline position respectively. Gonotheca (male) elongated, widening towards distal extremity, which is obliquely truncated, smooth or roughly corrugated. Containing one large gonophore, which is extruded into an external marsupium when mature. Measurements of hydrothecae (mm.). Samples in which typical nematocyst batteries could be recognized indicated by *. Height Diameter Diameter from at ———. diaphragm mouth height TRA 35D* a My ay -. I*O05-1°2I 0°90-0-99 0°74-0:92 TRA 36D": z% ee a -. I-05-1°21 0°76—0-99 0:72-0°82 (AFR 1028.0.A __.. a ei .. 0°78-1:01 0:65-0:77 0-69-0°86) TRA 23B* .. A 4 a, .. 1:07-1:28 0-80-1-13 0-68-0-98 SAMH 173* Ef ie ie -. I‘OI-1:28 0:83-0:93 0:68-0:92 SAMH 350* Me oy: ha -. 0°92-1'25 0:76-0:90 0-62-0:93 (NAD 1W* ve - y -. I*00-1'02 0-61-0-74 6°61-0-73) SCD 2oL* .. 0*79-I°00 0°55-0°75 0:58-0:93 SCD 37B 0:83-1:05 0:44-0:64 0:47-0:64 From Jarvis. . 0°85-0°9 0°75 0-83-0°88 From Jaderholm I*I-1°2 0-9 0+75-0°82 HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 53 M rae eich een eerie armen oo a Fic. 16. Thyroscyphus aequalis Warren. A.-K. Hydrothecae and pedicels from various colonies to show variation. L.—M. Male gonothecae, M with an external marsupium. (A from TRA 35D; B and C from AFR 1028.0.A (Natal); D and E from TRA 23B; F and L from SAMH 173; G from SAMH 350; H, I and M from SCD 29L; J and K from SCD 37A.) 54 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM From Splettstésser . . ny S .. O*°8-I'I5 0*75-0-92 From Warren ae zis He Be, 1-18 0°79 0°67 From Ritchie Ws os Ht ie 0-96 0°63 0-66 From Stechow Hp ite AF Np 0:96 0:60 0-62 Remarks. T. aequalis is closely related to T. torresi (Busk) and according to Splettstésser and Kramp the latter is distinguished from the former by (i) the presence of a perisarcal septum at the base of the hydrothecal apophysis, (ii) the presence of a single battery of large nematocysts situated in the ‘Deckelplatte’ rather than in the ectodermal lining of the hydrotheca, (iii) the shape of the hydrotheca which has a narrower mouth and somewhat protruberant adcauline wall, and (iv) the hydrothecal pedicel which is not annulated. In none of the South African material is there a septum at the base of the apophysis, and in all specimens where nematocysts are preserved the batteries are arranged as described by Warren, apparently indicating that all the material is conspecific. Yet there is so much variation in the shape and size of the hydrotheca and in the nature of the pedicel that it appears that characters (ii) and (iv) are of less systematic value than previously supposed (see fig. 16). The shape of the hydrotheca varies from a large form with a wide mouth and practically symmetrical sides to a smaller form with a narrower mouth and protruberant adcauline wall (see diameter/height ratios above), but all intermediate stages are present and nowhere can a definite dividing line be placed between the two forms. Sometimes both forms occur in the same sample. A similar variation is evident in the literature among records assigned by Splettstdsser to Cnidoscyphus aequalis; thus, the material of Jarvis and Jaderholm belongs near the top of the series and that of Stechow near the bottom. The hydrothecal pedicel in T. aequalis is said to be ‘annulated’. This annulation, when well developed, is due to the presence of a groove running spirally around the pedicel and completing a maximum of 2} turns, usually with half a turn more on the abcauline than on the adcauline side. However, the development of this groove varies considerably (and often within the same colony), and many pedicels would come into the category of ‘not annulated’ (fig. 16 C). The amount of annulation bears no relation to the size and shape of the hydrotheca, but may possibly be related to the age, as there is a tendency for more distinct annulation in older parts of the colony. In old colonies, how- ever, the spiral grooving is usually obscured by successive regenerations of the pedicel which are marked by deep transverse septa across its width. The gonotheca, of which only the male has been observed, is similar to that described by Ritchie, and is unique among male hydroids for the extrusion of the sexual products into an external marsupium. SUMMARY In the three families of hydroids considered here, a total of 50 species is recorded from the south and west coasts of South Africa. Of these 12 belong to the family Lafoeidae, 4 to the Syntheciidae and 34. to the Sertulariidae. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 55 6 new species are described, namely Hebella urceolata, { ‘ ' 1 % rt 4 ‘ ¥ { vii " ih " 4 f f rs y . gf ; { ' It < oo ah ag i ae ? Fae ( nee hie ae i ae Se Ome Oke eT, ¥, a ea Se H a Wee es ore 4 | ee ei Li Vera es : lee P / \ ’ i f hy 4 T oF y ' new : F ’ : } j 7 " A : up ny i y y iy " i ; +| iy ; v eed ak an PNSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including Taste or Contents and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 43 in. x 7 in. (7$ in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (black type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Smitu, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Smit, C. D. 1954. South African plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. and ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ; ‘ sey Bit a4 AF hil EE ' Oe 444, wi A Ce Fy Se ID A aia |) ge aes au a aa awl wis 2 Bier fia 2 een be be Gh at) un apa Wr. | ane Cn EL (: “va é Bee MO ey re er ae a AMttmtmenT Ge ‘joa sdatanti pst iste en ee Se A eee + » ae Pity, L809"? hee ete i nea af roa oie ey. oe wha Bhs peri) praise! is 4 , + y i Se a : : f 1) : t i : : : ctf : i f ha f ; i -— fe Beatie. S MA \ MUS. COMP. 70 eo Me KUIPER OL J J LIBRARY JUN 2 4 1964 “CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEBDGEaOF | YE TY PHE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) April 1964 April Volume 48 Band Pace). Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ; are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from The Librarian, South African Museum, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) ~ ee gle = Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van Die Bibliotekaresse, Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK Ti(t—2)), Q(t, 35 5» 7), PAGO 5(2, 5> 7-9; t.-p.i.), 6(1, t=p.i.),/8, g(Y), rota), frm 21, 24(2) 31(1-2), 44(4) Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel 4 49¢ Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty. Ltd. Die Rustica-pers Edms. Bpk. Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY JUN 2 4 1964 CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SANE RSA SPECIES OF THE GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLI By jd. G. J. JSuiper c.o. Institut Néerlandais, Paris (With 32 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . : - : : eM iig Abbreviations : 78 Key to the South aia species of Pisidium 78 Descriptions of species. ; ; Ry ;°) Summary. : , ; : . 94 References’ _. i : : : = 194 INTRODUCTION The fauna of South Africa includes, as far as we know, seven species of the genus Pisidium: pirothi Jickeli (syn. lepus Kuiper), harrisoni n.sp., costulosum Connolly, Jangleyanum Melvill & Ponsonby, viridarium Kuiper, ovampicum Ancey, casertanum (Poli). Pisidium langleyanum, P. costulosum and P. harrisoni seem to be South African endemics. The others are also known from Central Africa, while P. pirothi and P. casertanum also occur in North Africa. Another species, P. artifex Kuiper, which has been described from specimens taken in high mountain tarns in Kenya, has perhaps to be added to the South African fauna. The Pisidium fauna of South Africa is probably richer in species than the present paper suggests. A number of dubious forms are known but not yet described. Publication should wait until their specific identity has been cleared up. To this end, much more collecting has to be done. In the first place large series from each locality, preserved in alcohol (not in formalin which destroys the shell), are needed. This is necessary for a study of their little-known anatomy and in order to establish the subgeneric position of the species. The identification of the African pisidia is generally difficult, largely because of the high degree of discontinuity in their distribution and the specific poverty of the Piszdium associations. Whereas in palearctic regions ten species of Pisidium often occur in the same habitat, most of the African localities seem to be inhabited by only one or two species, rarely three. Quantitatively I have the impression that pisidia are not rare in South African inland waters. I have seen many series from widespread localities, a great many more than are (a Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (3), 1964, 77-95, 32 text-figures. 78 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM recorded in this paper, which were, however, all spoiled by formalin and so could not be identified. The present study is entirely based on material examined by myself. This would not have been possible without the aid of many malacologists who kindly put at my disposal the specimens and documents I needed. I am specially grateful to Dr. A. D. Harrison, at the time principal research officer of the National Institute for Water Research, Pretoria, who has furnished me, during many years, with valuable samples of Pzsidium collected in South African rivers. My grateful thanks are also due to the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for its assistance in the publication of this paper. ABBREVIATIONS ~The following abbreviations are employed in the lists of distribution: BML = British Museum (Natural History), London. CSIR = Catalogue of the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria. IZRP = Institute for Zoological Research, Potchefstroom University. KINB = Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen (Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique), Brussels. LMP = Laboratoire de Malacologie du Museum d’ Histoire Naturelle, Paris. MHNG = Musée d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva. MMAT = Koninklijk Museum voor Midden Afrika (Musée Royal de l’ Afrique Centrale) (formerly: Congo Museum), Tervuren, Belgium. NIWR = National Institute for Water Research, Pretoria. NMP = Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg. RML = Riyksmuseum van Natuurlike Historie, Leiden, Netherlands. SAM = South African Museum, Cape Town. SMF = Natur-Museum und Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Germany. SSAE = Swedish South Africa Expedition 1950-1. ZIUL = Zoological Institute, Lund University, Sweden. ZMA = Zoologisch Museum, Amsterdam University, Netherlands. ZMB = Zoologisches Museum, Alexander Humboldt University, Berlin. Key TO THE SouTH AFRICAN sPECIES OF PISTIDIUM 1. Ligament external,* projecting outside shell; ligament-pit long and narrow; shell inequi- lateral; sculpture regularly and finely striate ste bi , Se is pirotht eaten internal, not visible externally .. ae oe an : é aie 2 2. Umbo far back; shell outline oblong ovate, anterior part very ee ee rather regularly striate 3 ih ak harrisont Umbo median or submedian; shell aarline pare or peninenale equidaiceal or inequilateral; sculpture costulate or finely striate .. we ahs ae am oi as eee * Kuiper (1962) distinguishes three positions of the ligament-pit: 1, introverted position (ligament internal); 2, extroverted position (ligament external); 3, enclosed or normal position (ligament internal, may be slightly visible externally, but does not project outside the shell). S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 79 g. Sculpture regularly costulate; beaks submedian .. .. costulosum Sculpture regularly and densely striate; nepionic shell often nocueled by 4-7 sharp, dis- tinctive striae; shell outline subtrigonal .. . langleyanum Sculpture P ilatly and densely striate; shell Te Seas seals: calli haretened at the end of its inner slope ae .. viridarium Sculpture irregularly striate, ie oa fs shell patina ae or subtrees. Ae ON 4. Sculpture irregular, very fine; shell swollen, diameter being often more than Boene beaks tumid and extremely broad, ee ok at artifex Sculpture irregular, very fine; shell normally olen Tees: ede half height; posterior and anterior end nearly sols rounded; ventral margin of the shell much more curved than the dorsal margin which is nearly straight; beaks median; hinge very narrow. . ovampicum Sculpture irregular, fine; shell normally swollen, anterior end more pointed than posterior end; inequilateral; dorsal margin more curved than ventral margin; beaks submedian; central part of hinge rather broad .. a te fe oe ss .. casertanum DESCRIPTIONS OF SPECIES Pisidium pirothi Jickeli (figs. 1, 9, 30) Pisidium pirothi Jickeli, 1881: 340. Pisidium (Fossarina) casertanum var. alexandrina Pallary, 1909: 75, pl. 4, fig. 34. Pisidium cf. clarkeanum Gardner, 1932: 86, pl. 8, figs. 15-18. Pisidium costulosum Haas, 1936: 43. Pisidium clarkeanum var. exile Stelfox, Favre, 1943: 6-11, figs. 1-3. Pisidium lepus Kuiper, 1957: 85, figs. 1-4. Pisidium lepus var. dampfi Kuiper, 1957: 88, figs. 5, 6. Pisidium (Afropisidium) pirothi Kuiper, 1962. [Non] Pisidium costulosum Connolly, 1931. Remarks Pisidium pirotht is known from several localities in Egypt, south Sudan and the Central African Republic (formerly French Sudan). It has been collected in South Africa only in the Great Letaba River near Letaba Camp in the Kruger National Park by F. Haas in 1931 (Haas, 1936, p. 43, s.n. P. costulosum; Kuiper, 1957, p. 85, s.n. P. lepus n.sp.). These specimens are pre- served in the Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt, Germany (holotype SMF 155627, paratypes SMF 152628 and SMF 152886). Paratypes of P. lepus have also been deposited in the Zoological Museum, Amsterdam (ZMA/K 4577), the South African Museum, Cape Town (SAM Aa2g771), and the Natural History Museum, Geneva. For eighty years P. pirotht remained an enigmatic species, owing to the fact that the original description was not accompanied by figures and, secondly, that the type-series seemed to be lost. Recently, however, Jickeli’s original specimens were found (ZMB 37447, 1 lectotype and 6 paratype valves). ‘This, in addition to the discovery of several other localities in Africa, made it possible to define the range of what I some years ago called Pisidium lepus n.sp. Pisidium pirotht can be easily distinguished from all other South African species of this genus by its prominent external ligament and, consequently, the peculiar situation of its ligament-pit. I drew attention to this fact in my paper on P. lepus (Kuiper, 1957, p. 87). Its long, very narrow ligament-pit is bordered 1 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 80 S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 81 ventrally by a kind of pliciform callosity which has its analogy in the genus Eupera (Bourguignat, 1854; Klappenbach, 1960). A similar ligament has been found in the endemic species of Lake Tan- ganyika, Pisidium giraudi Bourguignat. The shell of P. pirothi is thin, subtransparent, and inequilateral, with a more or less pronounced, rather regular sculpture of concentric fine striae (about 10 striae on $ mm. in the middle of the shell). Details of the hinge structure are figured by Kuiper (1957, figs. 1 and 2). See also figure 9 of this paper. Pisidium pirothi is closely related to the Indian P. clarkeanum Nevill, the Javanese P. javanum Benthem Jutting and the South American P. sterkianum Pilsbry. All these species have an external ligament and belong to the sub- genus Afropisidium (Kuiper, 1962, p. 55). The Indian species is considerably larger and has a heavier shell than both the African and Indonesian species. J. Favre (1943, p. 11) classified the Egyptian specimens provisionally as a variety of the Indian species. I prefer to consider P. pirothi a distinct African species. I shall come back to this matter in a separate paper on the Central African pisidia. Pisidium lepus is the type of the subgenus Afropisidium. Pisidium harrisoni n.sp. (figs. 2; 12.99) Description Shell very inequilateral, elongate ovate, thin, beaks low, scarcely promi- nent, placed far back at one-quarter of the shell length. Dorsal margin short, half the shell length, slightly curved. Ventral margin broadly rounded. Anterior end very prolongate, obtusely pointed, upper side flattened. Posterior end faintly curved, perpendicular. Sculpture consisting of irregular fine concentric striae, 10-15 on 4 mm. in the middle of the shell. Ligament internal. The holotype is a closed shell. Its dimensions are: L. 4:1 mm., H. 3:1 mm., D. 2°1 mm. Type locality Vaal River between Morgenzon and Amersfoort, Transvaal (CSIR Val. 443 AA), leg. A. D. Harrison, 15.1X.1958. “= Fic. 1. Pisidium pirothi Jickeli, Kruger National Park, Transvaal; L = ligament visible externally. Fic. 2. P. harrisoni n.sp., holotype, Vaal River, Transvaal. Fic. 3. P. costulosum Connolly, Klein Berg River, Cape Province. Fic. 4. P. langleyanum Melvill & Ponsonby, Lake Chrissie, Transvaal. Fic. 5. P. viridarium Kuiper, Maseru, Basutoland. Fic. 6. P. ovampicum Ancey (paratype of P. georgeanum Kuiper), Gwyang River, Cape Province. Fic. 7. P. casertanum (Poli), Mokhotlong, Basutoland. Fic. 8. P. artifex Kuiper, paratype, Mt. Kenya. Enlargements: 1-5 and 7, X15; 6 and 8, x20. 82 _ ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM I et Mec Mages oe en F cy Y make aa Ym See! Aline aoe Le S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 83 Material Holotype in the South African Museum, Cape Town (SAM A29773); paratypes in the Zoological Museum of the Amsterdam University (ZMA/K 4979, 4980, 4982, 4983). Pisidium harrison was also collected in the Vaal River near Vereeniging (CSIR Val. 210 B) and at the Barrage (CSIR Val. 141 B), 1956 and 1958, by Dr. A. D. Harrison. These specimens are all smaller than the type. Dimen- sions of some paratypes: L. 3-40 mm. H. 2-80 mm. D. 1-90 mm. (CSIR Val. 141 B). L. 2°80 mm. H. 2-30 mm. D. 1:50 mm. (CSIR Val. 443 AA). L. 2°35 mm. H. 1-85 mm. D. 1:10 mm. (CSIR Val. 210 B). Description of the hinge of one of the paratypes (ZMA/K 4983): Hinge plate narrow, in the left valve nearly as broad below the umbo as laterally, in the right valve very narrow under the umbo; length (distance between the cusps of AI and Pi) half the shell length. Cardinal teeth C2 and C4 weak and short, C4 slightly posterior; C3 thin, thickened posteriorly. Cardinals nearer to anterior laterals than to posterior laterals. Lateral teeth AI and PI long and narrow, AIII and PIII very short; AII and PII shorter than AI and PI. Ligament-pit interior short, one-sixth of the shell length (fig. 12). Remarks I dedicate this species to Dr. A. D. Harrison, presently senior research fellow in the zoological department of the University College of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia. Pisidium harrisoni may easily be distinguished from all other African species hitherto known by its particular oblique shape. In this respect it somewhat resembles the palearctic species P. subtruncatum Malm which extends as far south as Algeria and Tangier. Pisidium costulosum Connolly (figs. 3, 11, 31) Pisidium costulosum Connolly, 19314: 310, pl. 13, figs. 24-27; 1939: 626, fig. 57. [Von.] Pisidium costulosum Haas, 1936-43. co Fics. 9-14. Hinges of Pisidium. Fic. g. P. pirothi Jickeli, Kruger National Park, Transvaal; left valve at the top; AI, AII, AIII, anterior lateral teeth; PI, PII, PIII, posterior lateral teeth; C2, Cg, C4, cardinal teeth; L, ligament-pit. Fic. 10. P. viridarium Kuiper, Chindamora Reserve near Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia; left valve at the top; PI, PII, PIII, posterior lateral teeth; C, callosity at the inner end of PIII. Fic. 11. P. costulosum Connolly, Klein Berg River, Cape Province; right valve at the top. Fic. 12. P. harrisoni n.sp., paratype, Vaal River, Transvaal; left valve at the top. Fic. 13. P. artifex Kuiper, paratype, Hall Tarns, Mt. Kenya; left valve at the top. Fic. 14. P. casertanum (Poli), Mokhotlong, Basutoland, left valve at the top. Enlargement: see scale in fig. 14. 84. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fics. 15-19. Some forms of Pisidium langleyanum Melvill & Ponsonby. Fic. 15. Lectotype, left valve at the top, C4 reduced. Fic. 16. Paratype, left valve, nearly oval. Fic. 17. Trigonal shel with prominent beaks, right valve at the top, C4 reduced; specimen from Jonkershoek neat Stellenbosch. Fic. 18. Left valve from Lake Chrissie; AS, anterior adductor scar; PS, posterior adductor scar. Fic. 19. Subtrigonal specimen from Potchefstroom, Transvaal. Enlargements: figs. 15, 16, 17 and 19, see scale in fig. 17; fig. 18, see scale in figure. S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 85 Distribution (fig. 31) Cape Province Berg River near Cape Town, at three different places (CSIR Gbg. 303 D; Gbg. 400 K; Gbg. 455 N), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1951 (ZMA/K 4189-4191). Klein Berg River, dam in Tulbagh Kloof (CSIR Gbg. 732 L), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1953 (SAM A29775; ZMA/K 4187, 4188). Orange Free State Rustfontein, Rhenoster River (near Bloemfontein), type locality (Connolly) (BML 1937.12.30.9066, lectotype, and 9067-9, three paratypes). | Transvaal Vaal River, barrage near Vereeniging (CSIR Val. 141 B, Val. 155), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1956 (ZMA/K 4978, 4991, 4994). Klip River, headwater near Muller’s Pass, between Memel and Newcastle (CSIR Val. 620 E), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1959 (ZMA/K 4977). Klein Jukskei River near Linden, Johannesburg (CSIR Cro. 111 A and 130 E), leg..B. R. Allanson, 1956 (ZMA/K 4972, 4975). Klein Jukskei River, Johannesburg (CSIR Gen. 44 A), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1954 (ZMA/K 4192). Braamfontein Stream near Northcliff, Johannesburg (CSIR Cro. 48 B and 118 F), leg. B. R. Allanson, 1956 (ZMA/K 4973, 4976). Zandfontein Stream, confluence with Jukskei Stream, near Leeukop Prison Farm, Pretoria district (CSIR Cro. 109 A), leg. B. R. Allanson, 1956 (ZMA/K 4974). Vaal River near Standerton (CSIR Val. 29 J), 7.XI1I.1955 (ZMA/K 4997). Description Pisidium costulosum may easily be distinguished by its regular sculpture of concentric narrow ribs. Its shape does not vary greatly. The characteristic sculpture, however, shows some variability. On the lower part of the shell the ribs are relatively widely spaced (about 5 ribs on } mm.), the spaces between the ribs being at least twice as wide as the ribs themselves. Towards the beaks the ribs become narrower and closer (up to 15 ribs on } mm.). Sometimes the smooth nepionic shell is surrounded by some strong, more widely spaced ribs. The shell is regularly porous, the distribution of the pores not being limited to the interstices of the ribs. The ligament is long and internal. The largest known specimen of P. costulosum measures: L. 3:4 mm., H. 2:8 mm., D. 2:1 mm. This was collected in the Klein Berg River, Cape Province (ZMA/K 4187). Remarks Apart from the Berg River, P. costulosum is also known from the Vaal and Orange River systems. It seems to be a typical South African species. It has only been collected in rivers and streams, so far never in brooks. P. costulosum is ofcen associated with P. langleyanum. 86 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fics. 20-24. Lectotype of Pisidium ovampicum Ancey. Fic. 20. Right valve. Fic. 21. Dorsal view of both valves, right valve at the top; for abbreviations see explanation to fig. 9. Fic. 22. Ventral view on hinge, right valve at the top; for abbreviations see explanation to fig. 9. Fic. 23. View on hinge, left valve at the top; AS, anterior adductor scar; PS, posterior adductor scar. Fic. 24. Profile view. Fic. 25. P. georgeanum (= P. ovampicum), paratype as figured by Kuiper, 1952; a, left valve; b, ventral view on hinge of left valve; c, right valve; d, ventral view on right valve; e, outline of juvenile specimen; f, profile view of single valve. Enlargement: figs 20-25, see scale above fig. 24. S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 87 The population recorded by Haas (1936, p. 43) in the Kruger National Park, Transvaal, does not belong to P. costulosum, but to P. lepus (Kuiper 1957), which proved to be a synonym of P. pirothi Jickeli. Pisidium langleyanum Melvill & Ponsonby (figs. 4, 15-19, 27) Pisidium langleyanum Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891: 237. Pilsbry & Bequaert, 1927: 351. Connolly, 1939: 625. Kuiper, 1960: 67, figs. 18-23. [?] Pistdium cf. langleyanum: Boettger, 1910: 455, pl. 28, fig. 19 a—b. [Non] Pisidium langleyanum: Melvill & Ponsonby, 1892, pl. 5, fig. 7. Distribution (fig. 27) Cape Province Port Elizabeth, leg. J. H. Ponsonby (Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891, p. 237; BML 1902.7.30.40-42, lectotype and 2 paratypes; SMF 152884, 1 paratype, leg. Ponsonby, 1889, ex coll. O. Boettger; Kuiper, 1960, figs. 18-23). Jonkershoek near Stellenbosch, fish-ponds (ZMA/K 4185; BML 15 sp.). Hogsback near Alice, small stream at the edge of the plateau at a height of about 4,000 to 4,500 feet (CSIR Misc. 10 and Misc. 62 B), leg. A. D. Harrison, 1950 and 1953 (ZMA/K 3762, ZMA/K 4177). Kimberley, leg. J. A. van Eeden, 1.X.1958 (IZRP; ZMA/K 13481). Grahamstown, leg. J. A. van Eeden, 13.III.1959 (IZRP; ZMA/K 13485). Uniondale, leg. J. A. van Eeden, 24.III.1959 (IZRP; ZMA/K 13487). Orange Free State Rustfontein, Rhenoster River (near Bloemfontein) (Connolly, 1939, p. 625; BML/Mus. Cuming 1937.12.30.9073, I specimen). Natal Durban, leg. J. A. van Eeden, 30.VII.1959 (IZRP; SAM A29769; ZMA/K 13488). Transvaal Klein Vaal (NIWR Val. 733 LL), about 9 miles from its confluence with the Vaal River (ZMA/K 13489). Headwater stream of Vaal River between Breyton and Lake Chrissie (CSIR Val. 743 DD), 22.VII.1959 (ZMA/K 4980). Lake Chrissie, leg. F. G. Gawston (NMP). Potchefstroom, leg. M. I. Livingston (NMP). Description The shell of P. langleyanum is characterized by its subtrigonal shape and its regular sculpture of fine concentric striae. Its nepionic shell is sometimes bordered by some (4-7) sharp striae. The shell is densely porous. Its dorsal margin is more strongly rounded than its ventral one. The shell of the type is 88 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ae eK eK 1000 MILES PISJIDIUM OVAMPIcUM ANCEY 26 ree CO ee PIS, PIROTH!) JICKELI 216) PIS. COSTULOSUM CONN, 31 Pils. HARRISONI N-SP. 32 Fics. 26-32. Distribution of Pisidia in South Africa. Pisidium ovampicum Ancey and P. casertanum (Poli) are also known from Madagascar. = Terw? S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 89 rather thin and has a narrow hinge (figs. 15, 16). The posterior laterals are parallel and do not converge proximally. A detailed description of the type is given by Connolly (1939, p. 625), who calls it ‘a somewhat immature shell with hinge system poorly developed’ (fig. 15). In heavier shells, such as those from Hogsback, Cape Province, the outer posterior lateral (PIII) bends proximally slightly towards the inner posterior lateral (PI). The outline of the shell is more or less ovate when the beaks are not prominent, and trigonal when they are prominent. Both forms may occur in the same population (Jonkershoek, Cape Province). The ligament is internal. It is, however, partially visible externally, resulting from a slight gaping of the valves behind the beaks, a feature which is rather common in the genus Prsidium. Dimensions of the lectotype: L. 2-9 mm., H. 2:5 mm., D. 1-8 mm. Dimen- sions of a number of other specimens from several localities: fe omm, H.3-4mm. D.2-6mm. Kimberley. L.38mm. H.33mm. D.2:8mm. Lake Chrissie, swollen shell (fig. 18). fieaamm. HH. 32mm. D.2-4mm. Jonkershoek, trigonal shell (fig. 17). ho32mm. H.26mm. D.2:3mm. Port Elizabeth. L.3-omm. H.26mm. D.2:2mm. Hogsback. L.2-9mm. H.2mm. D.2:0mm. Jonkershoek. 26mm. H.2:4mm. D.1t-9mm. Jonkershock. L.26mm. H.2:3mm. D.1-8mm. Hogsback. me24mm, H.otmm. D. 1-5 mm.” Hogsback. be2-2mm. H.2o0mm. D.1:5 mm. Potchefstroom (fig. 19). Details of the hinge structure are figured by Kuiper (1960, figs. 18-20, 23). Remarks The specimen figured by Melvill & Ponsonby (1892, pl. V, fig. 7) is not Pisidium langleyanum, but another species (Kuiper, 1961, p. 67). O. Boettger (1910, p. 455) recorded 6 subfossil valves from Witkop, Bechuanaland, under the name ‘Pisidium cf. langleyanum’. Connolly (1939, p- 625) has placed this form into the synonymy of P. ovampicum Ancey. In my opinion this is not correct. Boettger’s figures (1910, pl. 28, fig. 19 a—b) prove that it is not the ovate P. ovampicum, but a more trigonal species, perhaps indeed P. langleyanum. One of these specimens, a very small left valve, which I had the opportunity to examine (SMF 152885), did not allow me to decide with cer- tainty about its specific identity. I have not seen the other valves. Pisidium langleyanum is known only from southern Africa. It is closely allied to P. kenianum which is distributed in Central Africa. Perhaps they will prove to be identical. Both species are related to the Indian P. nevillianum Theobald. P. kenianum has a trigonal outline and is heavier. It can be considerably larger than P. langleyanum (up to 4:6 mm.). The distance between the northernmost known localities of P. langleyanum (Transvaal) and the southernmost ones of P. kenianum (in Tanganyika) is about 1,500 miles. gO ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Pisidium viridartum Kuiper (figs. 5, 10, 29) Pisidium viridarium Kuiper, 1956: 61-63, figs. 1-8. Distribution (fig. 29) Cape Province Gwyang River near George (CSIR Frw. 88), leg. A. D. Harrison, 4.V.1950 (ZMA/K 4178). Basutoland Maseru, Roma Mission Station, 5.[V.1958, leg. J. A. van Eeden (IZRP; SAM A29772; ZMA/K 13483). Remarks Pisidium viridarium was described from specimens collected in Kenya. This species is also known from Southern Rhodesia, Ethiopia, Uganda, Ruanda and Congo. Pisidium viridarium has a thin, ovate shell with submedian beaks. Young specimens somewhat resemble P. ovampicum. The regular sculpture of fine, equidistant concentric striae is the same as in P. kenianum and P. langleyanum. Its PIII is proximally thickened (fig. 10) as is often found in P. kenianum. The shell is densely porous. The affinities between P. viridarium, P. kenianum and P. langleyanum have not as yet been cleared up. The resemblance to the Euro- pean P. personatum which, incidentally, has been collected in Uganda, is probably phenotypical. P. vzrzdarium attains larger dimensions than P. personatum, one of the paratypes being nearly 5 mm. long. 7 Details of the hinge structure are figured by Kuiper (1956, figs. 1, 4, 5, 6). Ecologically P. viridarium seems to prefer marshy biotopes. It also lives in the mud out of the current in rivers where the aquatic vegetation is dense. It has been found associated with P. kenianum and P. ovampicum. Pisidium ovampicum Ancey (figs. 6, 20-26) Pisidium ovampicum Ancey, 1890: 162. Pisidium georgeanum Kuiper, 1952: 46-48, figs. a—/. [Non] Pisidium ovampicum Connolly, 1939: 625. Distribution (fig. 26) Cape Province Gwyang River near George, type locality of P. georgeanum Kuiper (CSIR Frw. 88), leg. A. D. Harrison, 4.V.1950 (holotype of P. georgeanum in RML, paratypes in LMP, MHNG, SAM A29774, ZMA/K 3604). Jonkershoek near Stellenbosch, fish-ponds, leg. A. C. Harrison, 1947 (ZMA/K 4184). S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) QI South West Africa Ovamboland (Ancey: Ovampoland = Damaraland), Omanbondé, type locality of P. ovampicum, leg. viatores Andersson and Chapman (KINB I.G.1059, lectotype of P. ovampicum). Remarks Pisidium ovampicum has been an enigmatic species for more than half a century. The original description is fairly good, but it is impossible to interpret because details of the hinge structure and figures were not given, and the type material was apparently lost. Connolly (1931a, p. 325), who therefore considered Ancey’s species as being ‘null and void, a just fate for such a slovenly description’,* has tried to give a new identity to P. ovampicum. He (1939, p. 626) described the hinge of specimens which he thought specifically identical with P. ovampicum Ancey. He too, however, failed to publish illustrations. P. ovampicum thus remained an obscure species until recently when an authentic specimen of this species was found in the Dautzenberg collection (KIN, Brussels). I now designate this specimen the lectotype of P. ovampicum Ancey. It was, as supposed by Connolly (1939, p. 626), ‘unopened’. I opened it by soaking the shell in water for some days. The specimens from Lake Chrissie, on which Connolly based his redescrip- tion ‘with the purely tentative suggestion that they may represent Ancey’s lost species’ (Connolly, 1939, p. 625), do not belong to P. ovampicum but to P. casertanum. Description Description of the lectotype P. ovampicum. Shell thin, ovate, nearly equi- lateral, opaque, no pores visible, glossy. Beaks smooth, median, not prominent, scarcely rising above the dorsal shell margin. Sculpture consisting of very fine irregular striae and two slight growth-lines. Greatest shell length in the hori- zontal median plane, greatest shell height in the vertical median plane. Ventral margin more rounded than dorsal margin. Anterior and posterior margins nearly equally rounded. Ligament internal, dark brown. Hinge plate narrow. In the left valve the lateral parts are scarcely broader than the central part; in the right valve the lateral parts are a little broader than the central part. The lateral teeth, PI, PII, AI and AII are narrow and have pointed, distal cusps. PIII and AIII are short, small teeth. Cardinal teeth thin, short and straight, C3 being the longest of all. C2 is a short tooth on the ventral margin of the hinge-plate; C4 as long as C2 and parallel to it. The distance between the cusps of AII and PII is 1-5 mm.; between those of AII and Ca, 0-6 mm.; between PII and C2, 0o-g mm. Ligament-pit 0-5 mm., narrow. Posterior adductor a little larger and situated lower than the anterior adductor. Dimen- * It is curious that Connolly (1939, p. 626), quoting Ancey’s original description, omitted its beginning: “Testa fragilis, pallide cornea... . 92 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM sions: L. 2-6 mm., H. 1-9 mm., D. 1-5 mm. (in the original description L. 22 mm,, H..27 mm.) D.14, mm.) The differences between the paratype of P. georgeanum and the lectotype of P. ovampicum are slight. Shape and sculpture are nearly the same. Equally large specimens of P. georgeanum have slightly more prominent beaks and conse- quently are a little higher. The junction between the dorsal and the anterior as well as the posterior margins of P. georgeanum are slightly more angulate. In both forms the hinge-plate is narrow, the laterals are thin and sharp, the cardinals small. In the lectotype of P. ovampicum, C4 lies slightly more posteriorly with respect to C2 than in the paratypes of P. georgeanum. In both forms the ventral margin is more curved than the dorsal margin. Pisidium georgeanum is porous, whereas the lectotype of P. ovampicum has no pores at all. Details of the hinge structure of P. georgeanum are figured by Kuiper (1952, figs. a—d). Remarks The form georgeanum is widely distributed in South and Central Africa, as well as on the isle of Madagascar. I have seen series from Uganda, Ethiopia, Congo and Madagascar. The following records turned out not to be P. ovampicum: (a) ‘A single weathered valve from Damara or Ovamboland’ (Connolly, 1939, p. 625; BML 1937-12.30.9070). (b) Two ‘better grown and preserved specimens from Lake Chrissie’ (Connolly, 1930, p. 625; BML 1937.13.30.9971—9972), originally published by Hutchinson (1932, Pp. 49). (c) The subfossil valves from Witkop Bechuanaland (SMF 152885), mentioned by O. Boettger (1910) as P. cf. langleyanum and placed by Connolly in the synonymy of P. ovampicum. I am not yet certain of the identity of the specimens mentioned under (a) and (c). I believe that (6) belongs to Pisidium casertanum (Poli). As to the habitat of these two specimens Hutchinson (1932, p. 49) wrote: ‘... taken ona rock surface under very wet soil at one of the springs bordering the lake.’ This agrees well with the ecology of P. casertanum. Dr. A. D. Harrison wrote me the following details on the first-mentioned locality: “The Gwyang, where these specimens were collected, is a small stream with a muddy bottom covered with Chara or Nitella; they were not very nume- rous and I had to sort through three or four sieve-fulls of bottom before we obtained the specimens in the tube. The water is acid with a PH of about 5; it is brown or peat stained.’ As to the second locality, the fish-ponds near Jonkershoek, Dr. Harrison noted: ‘The specimens were originally found fastened on to the noses of young trout.’ This observation is very interesting in connexion with the passive dis- S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 93 persal of these small clams by means of other animals, a subject about which very little is known.* Pisidium artifex Kuiper (figs. 8, 13) Pisidium langleyanum (non M. & P., 1891), Melvill & Ponsonby, 1892: 94, pl. 5, fig. 7. Pisidium artifex Kuiper, 1960: 68-74, figs. 1-17. Holotype in BML. Paratypes: SMF 162841-2; SAM A29770 (paratype Nr. 17); Coryndon Museum, Nairobi; ZMA/K 4909-4925, 4927. Remarks This species is known only from some high mountain tarns in Kenya. It is easily recognizable by its extraordinary swollen shape, its diameter being the same or even more than the height of the shell, and by its very broad and tumid beaks. Details of the hinge structure are figured by Kuiper (1960, figs. 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9). In the original description of P. artifex, I drew attention to the fact that the specimen figured by Melvill & Ponsonby (1802, pl. 5, fig. 7) cannot be P. langleyanum but probably belongs to P. artifex. If this should prove to be true, P. artifex has to be added to the South African fauna. Melvill & Ponsonby (1892), however, do not mention any locality. Pisidium casertanum (Poli) (figs. 7, 14, 28) Cardium casertanum Poli, 1791: 65, pl. 16, fig. 1. Pisidium ruwenzoriense Germain, 191 1a: 135. Pisidium ovampicum (non Ancey) Connolly, 1939: 625. Pisidium edouardi Kuiper, 1953: 26-28. | There are several specimens in the South African Museum (A29767 and A29768) from Ethiopia and Cyrenaica. Distribution (fig. 28) Cape Province Krom River, Stellenbosch (CSIR Ers. 6 L), leg. A. D. Harrison, 22.VIII.1952 (ZMA/K 4757). Transvaal A spring bordering Lake Chrissie (Hutchinson, 1931, p. 49, s.n. Pzsidium sp. juv.; Connolly, 1939, p. 625, s.n. P. ovampicum; BML 1937.12.30.9971—72). Basutoland Makkeka Mountains, 15 miles E.N.E. Mokhotlong, alt. 9,500 ft. In slow- flowing part of the stony high mountain stream, leg. Per Brinck (SSAE), 8.1V.1951 (ZIUL 2931; ZMA/K 4414). * See the classic work of H. Wallis Kew: The dispersal of shells. London, Kegan Paul & Co., 1893, pp. 61 sqq. [Ed.]. 94 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM South West Africa Grootfontein, farm Urupupa, leg. Thomson, 1912 (SMF 152883, one right valve ex coll. O. Boettger). Remarks Pisidium casertanum (Poli) is the commonest and most variable species in the holarctic region. In the Southern hemisphere this species is less variable. In northern Africa it lives in the coastal region from Morocco to Cyrenaica. It has not yet been found in Egypt. P. casertanum (Poli) var. alexandrina Pallary belongs not to this species but to P. pirothi Jickeli. In equatorial Africa it is known from many high mountain localities in Ethiopia, Uganda and Tanganyika. It has also been collected in Rhodesia (Herrington, 1962, p. 34). P. casertanum has been described from Madagascar under the name P. edouardi. The Austrian Madagascar Expedition 1958 collected this species commonly in central Madagascar. The specimens from the Makkeka Mountains, Basutoland, collected by the Swedish South Africa Expedition 1951, are identical with the types of P. edouard: from Madagascar (Kuiper, 1953, pl. 1, figs. 1-5). The dimensions of the five specimens taken in the Makkeka Mountains are: L,3:8 mum. SE 3-2 2 ame. L: 9-6 mm, » iT: 970:mim., |) Desa: Le 9:4 mum.) Ele eon) er -omima: L.12-o7°mm, He 2:4 moms moe L. 28 mm. E2-3.mm. ° D455 aa The East African mountain range seems to provide a climatic bridge from the palearctic region to the southern African area for this species. The dis- persion involved is perhaps due to the migration of aquatic birds. The identification of this variable species is often difficult. I have based my conclusions on conchological characters only, as these are more reliable than anatomical characters for specific identification in the genus Pisidium. SUMMARY The seven, or perhaps eight, species of the fresh-water lamellibranch genus Pisidium which are found in South Africa are described, with one new species, P. harrisoni. Taxonomic notes and figures and remarks on distribu- tion are included. REFERENCES Ancey, C. F. 1906. Description of two new Cleopatra and a new Pisidium. Nautilus 20: 45-46. BoETTGER, O. 1910. Die Binnenkonchylien von Deutsch-Siidwest-afrika und ihre Beziehungen zur Molluskenfauna des Kaplandes. Abh. senckenb. naturf. Ges. 32: 431-456. BourcuicenaT, J. R. 1854. Du genre Pisidium. Aménités malacologiques 1: 20-68. Conno.iy, M. 1931a. Contributions to a knowledge of the fauna of South West Africa. IX. The non-marine Mollusca of South West Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 29: 277-333. Ry A vate ences ii ta ee, A ll S.A. SPECIES OF GENUS PISIDIUM (LAMELLIBRANCHIATA) 95 Conno ty, M. 19315. Descriptions of new non-marine Mollusca from North, South and Central Africa, with notes on other species. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 8: 305-321. Conno ty, M. 1939. A monographic survey of South African non-marine Mollusca. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 33: 1-660. Favre, J. 1943. Revision des espéces de Pisidium de la Collection Bourguignat du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Genéve. Rev. suisse Zool. 50, fasc. suppl.: 1-64. GarpneR, E. W. 1932. Some lacustrine Mollusca from the Faiyum Depression. A study in variation. Mém. Inst. égypt. (Egypte) 18: 1-119. Germain, L. 1911a. Contributions a la faune malacologique de l’Afrique équatoriale. XXIV. Mollusques nouveaux de la région du Tchad et de l’Est africain. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris 17: 133-136. GERMAIN, L. 19115. Etude sur les mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles recueillis au cours de la mission de délimitation du Niger-Tchad. Docum. sci. Miss. Tilho 2: 165-245. Haas, F. 1936. Binnen-Mollusken aus Inner-Afrika, hauptsachlich gesammelt von Dr. F. Haas wahrend der Schomburgk-Expedition in den Jahren 1931-32. Abh. senckenb. naturf. Ges. 431: 1-156. HeErrincTon, H. B. 1962. A revision of the Sphaeriidae of North America. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 118: 1-74. Hutcuinson, G. E., Pickrorp, G. E. & ScHuuRMAN, J. F. M. 1932. A contribution to the hydrobiology of pans and other inland waters of South Africa. Arch. Hydrobiol. (Plankt.) 24: I-154. Jickxeui, J. F. 1881. Land- und Siisswasser Conchylien Nordost-Afrika’s, gesammelt durch J. Piroth. 7b. dtsch. malakozool. Ges. 8: 336-340. KLAPPENBACH, Miguel A. 1960. Ueber die Gattungen Byssanodonta und Eupera. Arch. Mollusk. 89: 141-143. Kuiper, J. G. J. 1952. Pisidium georgeanum, une nouvelle espéce africaine. Basteria 16: 46-48. Kurrer, J. G. J. 1953. Description de trois nouvelles espéces de Pisidium de Madagascar. 7. Conchyliol. g: 26-31. Kurrrr, J. G. J. 1956. Pisidium viridarium, eine neue Art aus Ost-Afrika. Arch. Mollusk. 85: 61-63. Kurrrr, J. G. J. 1957. Pisidium lepus, eine neue Art aus Afrika. Arch. Mollusk. 86: 85-90. Kurrrr, J. G. J. 1960. Pisidium artifex, eine neue Art aus Kenya. Arch. Mollusk. 89: 67-74. Kuiper, J. G. J. 1962. Note sur la systématique des Pisidies. 7. Conchyliol. 102: 53-57. Me tvit1, J. C. & Ponsonsy, J. H. 1891. Descriptions of nine new terrestrial and fluviatile mollusks from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (6) 8: 237-240. _ Me vit, J. C. & Ponsonsy, J. H. 1892. Descriptions of seventeen new terrestrial mollusks from South or Central Africa, in the collection of Edgar L. Layard Esq. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (6) 9: 87-97. Nevitt, G. & NeEvitx, H. 1871. Description of new Mollusca from the Eastern regions. 7. Asiat. Soc. Beng. 40, 2: I-11. PaLLary, P. 1909. Catalogue de la faune malacologique de l’Egypte. Mém. Inst. égypte (Egypte) 6, 1: I-91. . Pirssry, H. A. & BEQuaAERT, J. 1927. The aquatic mollusks of the Belgian Congo. Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. 53: 69-659. Pout, J. X. 1791. Testacea utriusque Siciliae ... 1. Parmae. etn RCL if i AYP aa ng dg tt vi y bs Bh set ; ae le} } “ Wal septs Tale Ma me or ae) ety PPM 1 y Deer an ou oN As f Ath i Aen “funi vie fi hel ai shin Ts | obey vee ae hen ae ¥ Je ame ue ey ? bag al i i y ‘* i 1 2 te is fae Mh t ’ J] } . B. wy \ : ve i " rag als Se .) 7 | € ~ , Pay i; ae Yih ae ; ‘ Pa iu 5 A vy 4 eu or hate a . , + ‘ : ree wpe ile Se ee ane a On ana PENS TRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE OF CONTENTS and SumMARyY. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 42 in. x 7 in. (7 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (black type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Smiru, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Smity, C. D. 1954. South African plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). a q A T of @ MUS. COMP. ZOOL: LIBRARY MAY 29 1964 UNIVERSITY, A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) April 1964 April Volume 48 Band Pat 4&2. Deel isl es. ee) EZ wo ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad ff The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from The Librarian, South African Museum, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van Die Bibliotekaresse, Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1(1-2), 2(1, 3, 5, 7)> 3(1)s 5(2 5: 7-9 t.p.i.}, 6(1;.t.-p.i), 8, 9(1), 10(1, 3), 11(7), “hen, 24(2) 31(1—2), 44a) Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel 6o0c : f . In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur Die Rustica-pers Edms. Bpk. Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap Printed in South Africa by The Rustica Press Pty. Ltd. Court Road, Wynberg, Cape MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY MAY 29 1964 HARVARD UNIVERSITY, A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) By J. H. Day Koology Department, University of Cape Town CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ae ile 2 wee OF Discussion of diagnostic characters ah). 9S Division into sub-families and genera .. 103 Sub-family Melinninae.. a Jen Tob Table of type-species .. me TOA: Key to genera Bs se 22, LOG Generic definitions .. ane ste ey LOO Sub-family Ampharetinae ne LO” Table of type-species .. fe LOU Key to genera a ate ie ee: Generic definitions .. Se a by Ae: Summary .. o sa a acer IG References .. = es aa Je, REDO INTRODUCTION The most complete account of the family Ampharetidae is that of Hessle (1917). He reviews earlier work including that of Malmgren (1865) and Fauvel (1897) on family and generic characters, Nilsson (1912) on the nervous system, Wiren (1885) on the alimentary canal, and Meyers (1887) on the nephridia. After giving further evidence from his own researches on the nephridia and structure of the stomach he goes on to discuss generic characters. While he follows the main lines laid down by Malmeren he finds that the genera were so narrowly defined by the latter worker that they seldom include more than one or two species, so that broader generic definitions are necessary. He criticizes Fauvel’s work on the enumeration of the anterior segments and his genera as being based partly on internal anatomical characters. Surprisingly enough Hessle’s own generic divisions may be criticized on the same lines. Although he stresses that the number of nephridia may vary from species to species in the same genus he has grouped the genera largely on the relative sizes and arrangement of these internal structures. Since the publication of Hessle’s work many new genera have been erected, particularly by Augener (1918), Chamberlin (1919), Benham (1921), Annenkova (1930), Caullery (1944) and Eliason (1955). In general these later workers focused attention on external features, particularly the development 97 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (4), 1964, 97-120. 98 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM of the paleae and the number of thoracic setigers, and they do not describe the nature of the nephridia nor the morphology of the stomach. As a result it is difficult to correlate the genera they describe with those defined in Hessle’s monograph. There is also another source of confusion. Nilsson and Hessle recognize only a single two-ringed buccal segment in front of the paleal or first branchiferous segment, so that the latter becomes segment II. This inter- pretation is followed by Annenkova (1930), Eliason (1955), and Uschakov (1957). On the other hand Malmgren (1865), Fauvel (1897 and 1927) and Caullery (1944) recognize two segments in front of the paleae, so that the latter which also bears the first pair of branchiae becomes segment III. At first sight it would seem of little taxonomic importance whether the first branchiferous segment is labelled segment II or III, but as many workers do not state which system of numbering they are using, statements such as ‘setae present on seg- ment III’ or ‘nephridia absent from segment V’ or ‘notosetae of segment XIII modified’ lead to confusion. To date about 150 species have been described, distributed through about 49 genera. Fifty-six species are ascribed to the three genera Amphicteis, Amage, and Ampharete, and the remaining 94 are distributed through the remaining 46 genera, many of which are monotypic. The need for revision is obvious. In the account that follows the various diagnostic characters are discussed, the grouping of genera is considered, and tables and keys are provided for the whole family. I wish to thank Dr. Olga Hartman for constructive criticism during the preparation of this paper, and both Mr. R. Sims of the British Museum and Mr. J. B. Kirkegaard of the Copenhagen Museum for allowing me to examine material housed in their respective institutions. The Trustees of the South Afritan Museum are grateful to the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and the University of Cape Town for grantis in aid of publication. DiscussION OF DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERS The head and buccal tentacles. The Ampharetidae are deposit feeders and the food particles are collected by mobile projections that arise from the roof of the buccal cavity. The most common type are buccal tentacles which are either smooth with a longitudinal groove on one side as in the Terebellidae or papillose; often these papillae are pinnately arranged, but not always, and © buccal tentacles of this type are best described under the more general term— ‘papillose’. Apart from tentacles, folded or probosciform feeding membranes have been described in Amythas membranifera Benham and Pabzts deroderus Chamberlin. An examination of Isolda whydahensis Augener showed a long ribbon-shaped structure protruding from the mouth with the distal end split into a number of short tentacles. As stated, these feeding organs arise from the roof of the buccal cavity and © in some cases the mouth cavity leads straight back into the pharynx; in other cases, however, an internal shelf or horizontal septum separates the tentacular A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 99 cavity above from the pharynx below. According to Hessle this septum corresponds to the dorsal lip of the 'Terebellidae. , Above the mouth there is a hood-shaped lobe which Hessle refers to as the *“Tentakelmembran’ and Fauvel as the prostomium. Since it bears the eyes and nuchal grooves and contains the cerebral ganglia the latter term will be used here. In some genera it also bears a pair of glandular ridges which diverge anteriorly and project from the antero-lateral margins as a pair of blunt processes. When the buccal tentacles are retracted the prostomium may appear bluntly pointed with obvious lateral grooves, so that the whole prostomium (or tentacular membrane) has been described as trilobed. When the buccal tentacles are fully extended, however, the whole head is stretched, the anterior margin is straightened, and the lateral grooves disappear. This mobility of the head means that the exact shape of the prostomium is of little systematic value. The glandular ridges, however, are always recognizable and the eye-spots can usually be found. The segmentation of the head region. As described earlier (Day 1961) the region behind the prostomium is telescoped and the segments are distorted. ‘The branchiae are often grouped on a transverse branchial ridge which partially overhangs the segments immediately behind the prostomium. The ventral surface in Melinna and related genera is distorted by the formation of a pair of lateral folds which slope back from the mouth region towards the dorsum of segment VI where they unite to form a transverse dorsal crest. On the basis of dissection and examination of external features I have accepted the interpreta- tion of Malmgren, Fauvel, and others that there are two achaetous segments preceding the branchiae in all genera. The first branchiferous segment, which bears the paleae in some genera, thus becomes segment III. The branchiferous region (segments III-VI). In the more primitive genera, including Phyllocomus, Melinna, Isolda, Amphicteis and Ampharete, there are four pairs of gills. Dissection of the blood-vessels of Amphicteis gunneri, described by Day (1961), showed that the four gills are supplied by four blood-vessels corresponding to segments III, IV, V and VI. With the telescoping of the anterior segments, however, there is a tendency for the four pairs of gills to be grouped on the dorsal surface of segments III and IV. In Phyllocomus the first two pairs are on segment III and the last two pairs are segmentally arranged. The same arrangement has been reported in Amage auriculata and Amphicteis posterobranchiata. In other genera the arrangement may be 2 : 2 or 3 : 1 where three pairs of gills are arranged in a transverse row across segment. III with the fourth pair immediately behind. In many genera the primitive number of four pairs of gills has been reduced to three and in Auchenoplax Eblers and its synonym Melinnoides Benham only two pairs have been reported. The gills may be separate from one another or united by a basal web.) | ele) ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Commonly this web unites only the first three pairs of gills, leaving the fourth posterior pair free. The gills may be smoothly cylindrical in shape or may develop lateral papillae or flanges or even a series of lateral lamellae. Commonly the branchial papillae are arranged in two lateral rows, and such branchiae have been termed bipinnate, but this is not always the case. In Pterampharete luderitzt, for example, numerous irregularly arranged papillae arise from the anterior surface of the branchial axis. In generic descriptions such gills are best described by the broader term papillose. Similarly the lateral lamellae of such forms as Phyllamphicteis collaribranchis Augener and Phyllocomus (olim Schistocomus) hilton (Chamberlin) may be arranged in one or more rows. The telescoping of the branchiferous region often results in the fusion of segments and the loss of setae. In Jsolda and Melinna of the sub-family Melinninae the neurosetae of the four segments III-VI are present though those of segment VI may be lacking in some species. Segment III never has notosetae, and segment IV has notosetae in the form of stout hooks behind the gills, but the notosetae of segments V and VI are either small or absent. In Melinnopsis — McIntosh the hooks of segment IV are lacking, but notopodial capillaries are ~ present on segments V and VI. In the sub-family Ampharetinae neurosetae are never developed on segments III to VI. In a few cases all four segments may be distinct, but usually segments III and IV are fused and occasionally segments III, IV and V. The notosetae are variously developed. In primitive forms such as Amphicteis the notosetae of segment III are enlarged to form stout paleae and those of segments I[V—VI are all present as normal capillaries. Often, however, the capillary notosetae of 1V and V are small or absent. Similarly the notosetae of segment III may remain small and not form paleae, or may be entirely lacking. In Sabellides, for example, the notosetae of segment III are either absent or represented by small capillaries, segment IV is fused to segment III and lacks setae, and the first normal capil- laries are on segment V. In Neosabellides elongatus there are no setae on segments III and IV, and in Paramage madurensis Caullery reports that the first bundle of notosetae appears on segment VI though earlier achaetous notopodia remain. In view of the many variations in the setation of the branchiferous segments III to VI and the difficulty of deciding whether small setae present on the fused third and fourth segments represent small paleae of segment III or small capillaries of segment IV, it would seem undesirable to base generic divisions on the presence or absence of paleae as has been done in the past. Internal characters: diaphragm, nephridia, stomach. Apart from a few minor details no new researches are reported here under this heading. The information concerning the type-species of each genus has been extracted from Hessle (1917), supplemented by additional information from Annenkova (1930), and has been summarized in tables I and II. In several genera no information is available concerning the internal anatomy. The coelomic cavity of the first few segments is separated from the rest of the thorax by a relatively stout septum or diaphragm. According to Hessle this A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) aio always lies between segments IV and V, but according to the enumeration of segments adopted here it lies between segments V and VI. Following Hessle’s terminology the nephridium in segment V (Hessle’s segment IV) is termed the anterior nephridium, and all later ones are posterior nephridia. Never more than five pairs of nephridia have been reported; in some cases there are only three and in exceptional cases only two. At first sight the number of nephridia would appear to provide a reasonable basis for classification, but as Hessle himself has pointed out, their distribution is not constant. In some cases four pairs may be present in segments V to VIII, in others the nephridium in VI is missing and the four pairs are in V, VII, VIII and [X; again V may be missing and the four pairs are in segments VI-IX. The same variability occurs in those species in which there are only three pairs of nephridia. They are located in segments V, VI and VII in Sosanopsis wirent, Parhypania brevispina and Hypania invalida, and in segments V, VII and VIII in Sabellides octocirrata. Even when the number is reduced to two pairs there are differences in arrangement. In Phyllocomus crocea and Schistocomus (=Phyllocomus) hiltont the nephridia are in segments VII and VIII, and in Lysippides fragilis they are in segments V and VII. Hessle further reports that the number of pairs of nephridia is not constant within the single genus Ampharete but may vary from two pairs situated in segments V and VII for A. acutifrons and A. arctica to four pairs situated in segments V, VII, VIII and IX for A. lindstromi and A. kerguelensis. The num- bering of the segments given here is of course one higher than that given by Hessle. In view of this variability of the nephridia and the labour involved it would seem undesirable to base generic divisions on these structures as has been done by Hessle. None the less the nephridial papillae of the anterior nephridia in segment V are occasionally visible. In Sabellides and Pterampharete the ducts are elongated dorsally and two nephridial papillae may be found on the branchial ridge between the two groups of gills. In Anobothrus, Sosane and Asabellides the ducts open on a single nephridial papilla in the same position. These characters, while not in themselves sufficient for generic distinction, provide useful confirmatory evidence. , The alimentary canal is normally a fairly straight tube divided into pharynx, oesophagus, stomach and intestine. At the anterior end of the stomach where it joins the oesophagus a pair of lateral pouches project forward in Ampharete, Microsamytha and Anobothrus, but not in Melinna nor fourteen other genera which have been investigated by Wiren (1885), Hessle (1917) or Annenkova (1930). There is also a curious invagination of the ventral wall of the stomach of some genera, which is referred to by Hessle as an ‘innere Blind- sack’ and is here termed an internal diverticulum. It has been found in Amage, Amphicteis, Amphisamytha and Hypania, but not in fourteen other genera which have been examined. Since such characters demand dissection they are of doubtful value in practical classification. 102 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The posterior thorax. As stated earlier, the first branchiferous (or paleal) segment is reckoned here as segment III and the branchiferous region as extending over segments III to VI. The beginning of the posterior thorax on segment VII is marked by the first appearance of uncini in the neuropodia in all genera. It is the most important and most easily recognizable landmark on ~ the body. Segments anterior to it may be distorted or fused and individual © segments may lack notosetae or nephridia, but segment VII and the posterior thoracic segments are always well defined and fully developed. The maximum number is 14 and the minimum number is 11 in all genera except Mugga, where there are 9. It is suggested therefore that the numbers of such uncigerous thoracic segments provide better generic characters than the total number of thoracic setigers which have led to such confusion. The notopodia of the posterior thorax are conical projections which in Amphictets and several other genera bear a terminal papilla or ‘notopodial cirrus’. ‘The neuropodia are short projecting pinnules and in a few genera such as Phyllocomus they bear a superior papilla or cirrus above the row of uncini. The notosetae are winged capillaries which are very uniform in shape with few exceptions. In Anobothrus the 8th uncigerous segment has its notopo- dium elevated and the tips of the notosetae are minutely spinulose. In Mugga the same phenomenon occurs on uncigerous segment 9, and in Sosane and Sosanopsis it occurs on uncigerous segment 12. The uncini are flattened tooth plates of various shapes but are all roughly triangular to quadrangular, with one or more series of teeth above the base. In the Melinninae there is always a single series of teeth, but in the Ampharetinae the teeth of the thoracic uncini may be arranged in 1, 2 or as many as 5 vertical rows. Abdominal uncini often have more rows of teeth. The base of the uncinus may be long and well separated from the tooth rows, or it may be short and curve up towards the lowest tooth to form a bluntly rounded prow. Hessle and others have quoted such differences as generic distinctions, but to me they appear to be no more than specific characters, for the shapes vary very consider- ably. The number of tooth rows seems to be more important when there are only one or two vertical series, but when there are three or more they lose their value. The abdomen. There is seldom any abrupt narrowing between thorax and ~ abdomen, merely a change in the parapodia. This, however, is well marked. The notosetae disappear and the notopodia are either reduced or absent. In Melinna, Amphicteis, Amage, Phyllocomus and many other genera, rudimentary notopodia persist on abdominal segments, and this is regarded as the more primitive condition. In Ampharete, Sabellides and others, notopodia are entirely lacking. Where notopodial cirri are present on the thorax they tend to persist on the rudimentary notopodia of the abdomen, as may be seen in Amphicteis and ~ Amage. Similarly, where neuropodial cirri are present on the thorax these also are continued on the abdomen. Actually the uncigerous pinnules very often have an obscure superior papilla and this tends to become better marked towards all. omar jet! A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 103 the end of the abdomen. This is particularly well shown by Sabellides octocirrata where the superior papillae become long cirriform projections. The whole abdomen consists of a variable number of segments. In the Melinninae there is always a large number of segments, the extremes being a minimum of 20 in Melinnexis antarctica and a maximum of go in Irana hetero- branchia. In a few primitive genera of the Ampharetinae there are also large numbers of abdominal segments. Thus Phyllocomus crocea has 45 but in the great majority of genera the number is much less, 12-18 being the usual range. It is doubtful whether the exact number is constant for a species, and certainly it is not of generic importance. The abdominal uncini are more or less similar to those of the thorax but usually there are more teeth arranged in more vertical rows or transverse arcs. The pygidium is terminal and may be encircled by a number of low indistinct papillae or may bear a reduced number of longer anal cirri. _DIVISION INTO SUB-FAMILIES AND GENERA Hessle (1917) does not divide the Ampharetidae into sub-families, although his remarks on p. 90 show that he is inclined to separate Melinna and Isolda from other genera in this way. Chamberlin (1919) proposed three sub-families, namely the Melinninae with dorsal hooks behind the gills but no paleae, the Ampharetinae with paleae but no hooks, and the Samythinae with neither paleae nor hooks. Since the publication of Chamberlin’s monograph many new genera have been described. The diagnostic characters of the various type-species are set out in tables I and II, and it will be immediately obvious that there are several genera related to Melinna. Not all of these possess dorsal hooks behind the gills, but they all possess fine acicular neurosetae in segments III, IV, V and often VI. I agree with Hessle in regarding this as an important and primi- tive feature which links the Amphaetidae to Terebellides and other genera of the Trichobranchidae and through them to the Terebellidae. I have therefore enlarged Chamberlin’s diagnosis of the Melinninae to include all Ampharetidae with acicular neurosetae in segments III-VI whether they possess dorsal hooks or not. ‘he amended characters of the sub-family are given later. Chamberlin’s sub-families Ampharetinae and Samythinae are distinguished by the presence or absence of paleae. The variability of these setae has been described earlier; as the accompanying tables show, the setation of the whole branchial region is not sufficiently reliable for the distinction between genera, let alone sub-families. Several other possible groupings of genera have been tried on the basis of the number of branchiae, the number of uncigerous thoracic segments and the number of tooth rows on the thoracic uncini. None of them were satisfactory in that they distinguished groups of genera with many charac- ters in common. It was concluded that all the Ampharetidae apart from the Melinninae must be included within the sub-family Ampharetinae and that Chamberlin’s sub-family Samythinae must be sunk. A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 104 ‘sid § ou gz é é ou é yoows -aou ‘usd Aecy sapisdouurpapy “sasdou (oS61 -uyapy yo wiAuouds ev ¢ (yioours Tye) ae Es pa "I'M. Dip4sor "Py 9d) WMNSOI JNO}s BV UMIWIO}SOIG a[qQo0J OG-oF 3G é soA é ‘sad Fst /— et ae; YIOOWs puUN'T-s1oquosoAA Sapiuurjay ‘ssouurjapy Jo wAu XI ‘IIA (0861 -ouds ¢ “IID yeue SuoT ‘IIA ‘A. (yioours [[e) O52 8B ‘uuy vsy01KD “Py adh) “ad 1 ‘opowqua} oBuey AoA rt 6g (Ok-03 é aqooy ut ‘sid F 2 i A Ba oom yioous o&61 vAoyuouUY sixauurpayy (Sggr (y}oouIs |e) er ae Ay ‘PIN voyuvyo “Py 2d) é o€-Gz ¢ é ou . ‘0 Pit (Oh oe yioowus Seg ysoyupoy sesdouuyapy (4981 (osoytded) sae Se aie: ‘SQyy vjpwin *GQ adh) ‘ppjosy Jo wiAuoUAs B 3 ¢ -Augur, ¢ é SoA J ‘cache ~ Sn 3 fl é Logi sioqury vypd10a—Q (asoyided a (6761 "J—M ‘yjoouls 1) ET) ey pypiysubiqgosajay “ft IAA) GU 0G Fs sod é ‘SIC. 1 g1 H yloous 6761 pun'y-siaquasa\\ DUDLT “2qo] (asoyided z (gSgI- snosajINeyUs} = ayTOV.NaI ‘yOous &) (0) D D D ‘TOI Vyaya7nd *y 2dA}) e sey ‘Sny sisuaypptyn -~ ou g&-Gs ¢ é soA é ‘rdey si Ga mana yjoous QSQI JOIN Vpjosy (gSgI sieg ‘oeyided younsiput jo XI-IA (yjoours |[2) CD OT pynjsisa sapiyjaqos' ad) apoio Ajaisut ‘T4Id Teue ON aTqoeJ OS-of& ou ou sok ur‘sidh ‘sid oat V1 yy ree] yOoUWS QOgI UoISsW[eP, vuUIapy “VI MOTOq (6161 2QO] SNOsJOFIPNIe}UI} B YIM (qqOours []z) 6 D D Dd syspwas “UTeYD suvs0zdxa “pr adAy) wiojiosoqoid umiuosoig ou Gg'2 ¢ sak sak é seul Ge een 9as 6161 ulploquieyD snuvdopy oe ». a 5 go z a 2S IA A AI III Qu Qu. +@® AG nm nm KS} RO FR 6 age gee Se oy Se 6, & 3.08" Si Ss) 5 is) 5 = 5 = a Fae yay EO) et a ee er mae ae IA-III syIeUloy Se ee & Sree ea? 2 aviyoueig 5 & @ & s}uswIS8as sa]oe}UN} saroads-odAq 5 & g oy < 5 @ 8 jo uonejag = eoong pue snues Ss B Cae es gee Ba tien 8 "yUasqe JO yUasoid aq AvuUr avjas D}¥dIpUT sIsay}UIIed UT s191}9T— (9) 10 (”) *syooy [etpodojou = FY ‘sorseyjideo [erpodojou [jews = 9 ‘avjas Jeno10e [erpodoinsu = v AVNINNITAW ATINVA-GNS FO SHIOddS“AdAL GNV VYANAD AO SYALOVUVHO ‘| Fav, ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 105 The reliability of the various characters which may be used to distinguish genera has been discussed earlier. To be of practical value in a taxonomic key such characters must not only be constant within a group of species which are obviously similar in other ways, but they must also be easily seen when sorting a sample. It is suggested that among such characters are the number of gills, and the number of uncigerous thoracic segments, the presence of glandular ridges on the prostomium and the possession of notopodial cirri. These have therefore been used as the main basis for grouping genera with the addition of several other features in specialized cases. It is tempting to use the obvious ornamenta- tion of the gills as well as their number, but after careful consideration this was omitted for it would have increased the number of monotypic genera without breaking up the three large genera Amphicteis, Amage and Ampharete. In any case the gills are often missing so that their ornamentation cannot be decided, and only the scars remain to determine their number. As stated earlier, 49 genera are currently recognized as valid. In the accompanying key these have been reduced to 33 of which 6 are assigned to the Melinninae and 27 to the Ampharetinae. This means that 16 genera have been sunk, and reference to the tables will show that 11 of these were monotypic and the other 5 contained 2 species each. One new genus has been erected in the sub-family Melinninae. It is hoped that this revision will make the recognition of genera much simpler, but inevitably it will be found that many species have been assigned to the wrong genus. This is certainly true of two species assigned to Lysippe by myself and one referred with hesitation to Neosabellides. Key to sub-families 1. Segments III—V (or III—-VI) with fine acicular neurosetae. No paleae. Post-branchial hooks sometimes present .. : “ins .. Melinninae Segments III—VI without neurosetae. No post- ties hooks. Paleae sometimes present .. ta ie is bs ie .. Ampharetinae 106 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SuUB-FAMILY Melinninae Chamberlin 1919 (characters amended) Buccal tentacles never pennate or papillose, usually smooth with a groove along one side. Paleae absent. One or two pairs of stout notopodial hooks may be present behind the gills. Small acicular neurosetae embedded in segments III, [TV and often V and VI. Uncini are from segment VII and always have a single series of teeth. Numerous (20-90) abdominal segments. Key to genera of Melinninae 1. Stout notopodial hooks behind the gills .. me Ue ai am 2 No notopodial hooks ae , Bh ae 5 2. Notopodial hooks on two seopanee: Prosiouinin ‘Gloasarea Ab .. Moyanus (doubtful) Notopodial hooks on segment IV only. Prostomium short .. ae 3 3. 4 pairs of gills be ae in 4 : pairs of gills, including both conecih al papilese ae by .. Jrana 2 pairs of papillose gills .. aA ag 28 ae, aa .. Odvorpata (doubtful) 4. Allgillssmooth .. or + Ag so .. Melinna Some gills smooth, some aamhese te Me ae hie .. Isolda 5. 4 pairs of smooth gills a, ao as oi a a .. Melinnopsis 3 pairs of smooth gills My ite ey nF Ar oy .. Melinnopsides MOYANUS Chamberlin 1919 Prostomium elongated and probosciform. Buccal tentacles mounted on long tongue-shaped projection. Four pairs of smooth gills. A dorsal crest on segment VI. Segments [II-VI with notopodial hooks on segments IV and V and fine acicular neurosetae on segments III, IV and V. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments and about 65 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single penies (et tert Type-species Moyanus explorans Chamberlin 1919. MELINNA Malmeren 1866 Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove on one side. Four pairs of smooth gills. A dorsal crest across segment VI. Segments III—-VI with notopodial hooks on segment IV and notopodial capillaries on segments V and VI. Fine acicular neurosetae on segments III—V and sometimes on VI as well. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments and 30-50 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single series feo Type-species Sabellides cristata Sars 1851. IsOLDA Miiller 1858 Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove on one side. Four pairs of gills of which 2 are smooth and 2 are papillose. A dorsal crest across segment VI. Segments III-VI with notopodial hooks on segment IV and notopodial capillaries on segments V and VI. Fine acicular neurosetae on segments III-V and sometimes on VI as well. Twelve to 13 uncigerous thoracic segments and 25-36 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single series of teeth. Type-species Isolda pulchella Miiller 1858. A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 107 IRANA Wesenberg-Lund 1949 Buccal tentacles smooth. Three pairs of gills of which 1 is smooth and 2 are papillose. A dorsal crest across segment VI. Segments III-IV with notopodial hooks on segment IV and fine acicular neurosetae on segments III-VI. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments and about 90 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single series of teeth. Type-species Lrana heterobranchia Wesenberg-Lund 1949. OEORPATA Kinberg 1867 An incompletely described genus with two pairs of pennate gills; noto- podial hooks on segment IV; many abdominal segments; uncini with a single series of teeth. Type species Oeorpata armata Kinberg 1867. MELINNOPSIS McIntosh 1885 Synonyms Melinnexis Annenkova 1930 and Melinnides Wesenberg-Lund 1950. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Four pairs of smooth gills. Dorsal crest on segment VI present or absent. Segments III-VI without notopodial hooks on segment IV but with notopodial capillaries on segments V and VI. Fine acicular neurosetae on segments III—-V and sometimes on VI as well. Ten to 14 uncigerous thoracic segments and 25-50 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single series of teeth. Type-species Melinnopsis atlantica McIntosh 1885. MELINNOPSIDES gen. Nov. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Three pairs of smooth gills. No dorsal crest on segment VI. Segments III—VI without noto- podial hooks on segment IV but with notopodial capillaries on segments V and VI. Fine acicular neurosetae on segments IIJ-V. Ten uncigerous thoracic segments and about 30 abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini with a single series of teeth. Type-species Melinnopsis capensis Day 1955. SUB-FAMILY Ampharetinae Chamberlin 1919 (characters amended) (including Samythinae Chamberlin 1919) Buccal tentacles either smooth with a groove along one side or papillose. Paleae present or absent. No notopodial hooks behind the gills. Neurosetae absent from segments III to VI. Neuropodial uncini start on segment VII and may have one or more series of teeth. Few (8) to many (60) abdominal segments. ! odA}) a — —— eA = M11GDAL $1a101U dU ee sod g or ou ‘ou Ur -sad % ma? so vr } tT) 2 @ Goose om L161 OyeaET saprs@y *LTTIOOUIS & (aye]ourRy] & (g161 ‘sny *yOOUIs &) siyguvigisnjj09 *gq adk}) ‘ad yeue ed 1 = Ou GI é é sod é ‘sudb or: br YY 9 9 g{ Yoous ou gi6s s9UDBNY sranYydun] yg (6161 “sraganyg (yioours [[¥) sureyQ issdqo “q addy) -wpp) (yg jo wiAuouds § ]TeUIs §=03 é é sod é ‘idb €z V1 YH DO F Yoous ou 6161 ulpsoquieyy vauvg (Sggr (yjoours |[2) ‘PY 29194DJuD “5 9d4}) ‘ammo yeue ued 1 «sak GZ é é é ¢ ‘sidboG@ iI 909) 29 -— yqjoows soaK Sggi ysoyUpII v77aUvIGnNIy = (O9gI “15 2 IIA-A_ (qoours [[e) ppyoau sranyquy 2d44) 5 sodA o€-G1 sok ou ou ur‘sid & ‘swdboG¢ €1 Oy 2 gq woows sof L6g1 AnoowONsC vundty = (OQgI “15 snurds Z IIA-A_ (qjoours TTR) “tnaig § Siajnyquty ad) S QIqoof OS-QI Ou ou ou ur‘sid & ‘sidb 31 i yO YD qd WMoous sok Qab1 eaoqyusuuy nuvdtysng = (9981 < IIIA-A_ (qnoouis [Te) “wae Yyvjnaiuny “vy ad Ay) = ‘lam Teue sured 3 sod 8 Sak OU SoA Sur sid 1 ‘de -G=1. Ii) 2 = > Ooms =sak QOgI UoISWIe app b (gLQI “15 5 (y0oUIS [[z) 280] pyofuysnsnn sapiyjaqns adA1) = ‘amd Jeue Ired I yews SGI é é sod “ ‘sidv 31 $1 gg 92 9 -— -fided¢ sok P61 ArayNerD siajoyquvsg = (SEgI sIeVg ~ XI-A (qjoours [[z) qauuns = aguydupy adAq) S ‘lao yeue aed 1 sod GI é é sof ut ‘sid G sid Yt Vi) D Oe a. Gioouls cok IGQI oqnin siajqydup = wm = oe Z ce Sk Z Z bee 6 eee s 2 Z eet ee a 6 2 Se 8 e: 35 g ee ee ee Be a Tele gE : a SYIVUIDY 5 6B CUR = BS 8. QO. avipouelg ©° 6 £6 sjuouiges © sopovjuaa SF sotoads-adA} RF FR PE pee 2 > 5 Ss & jouoneec jeoong = | pu snues) Sa eee 8 5 Be coal :h ee ee e 3 } 8 = 5 Qu ot Sc =e Sage B ‘yuasqe 10 yuasord oq AeUI ov}98 9)e9IPUT sIsoyUoIed UT s19}}9[— (7) 40 (9) ‘I]] JuowSeas uo ovayed [pews Jo a81e] = ¢ Jo g ‘sorseyideo [erpodojou [[euls 10 asr1e] = 9 10 —E AVNLLAUVHINV ATINVAGAS AO SAIOddS“AdAL CNV VYANAD JO SYXLOVAVHO 108 ‘II Fav 109 A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) “aUDSOS jo uwitMuouds 3 ‘poyIpoul g JUSTUSOS o10vIOY}] snorasIO -un jo 9v}9S0O}0N ‘avIyouRIq u99Mj0q eyided jerprmydou 1 *peyrpour yUNTUSOS o1ovl0y} Jst] JO ovj}OSO}ONV ‘oeIpouRIq UIaMI0q eyided jerprzydou 1 “snwor0jj (yg jo witXKuouds ji ‘T1110 yeue sued & ‘oeyjided jeue jo 910 WV opt] -jaqospy yo wiAuouds ¢ ‘TII10 Teue sted 1 "Idd10 Teue ared I -adqis’y Jo urAuouAs ¢ "IdJID Teue ated 1 “sopig -fiséq jo wikuouds ¢ -sopad -GistqT jo wiAuouds ¢ sod a yews 1 sok §S-—0§ sod CV OU OZ-QI soA Le ou oI ¢ ° LI-Si¢ sod VI é &z soA VI ou ou é ou ou soA ou ou Cue sod sok ou. ou ou ou ou ou sod ou ou ou ou ou ou ou SN. ‘TIA ‘A (qiOouIS T[e) ur ‘sid ‘sid XI ‘TIIA ‘ITA ‘A (qloours qT) ut ‘sid V ‘sad V ILIA = (22 BJ JourreT & RITA ‘“tpoous 1) ul ‘sid & ‘sid V TIA 9 TIA (posuep) ul ‘sid & ‘sid (qjoours {7e) « ‘sid 7 (yjoours ][2) 5 ‘sid [7 IIA 2 A (y2oouIs TTe) ul ‘sid @ ‘sid (osoyjided 1 ‘yj0ouls &) a ‘sad V IIIA-A_ (toours [Tz) ul ‘sid 7 ‘sid V IIA-A_ (q}00uNs |e) ut ‘sid & ‘sid IIIA-A_ (qi00uIS T[2) ut ‘sid V ‘sid V a ee ee GI rem Gol GI GI GI GI eit G1 VI yoours yjoouls yOouIs yoous asopided asorided asoyjided YIOoUIS qoouls yoouls yuoours ou ou ou OU ou ou. ou ou ou ou ou (g9g1 “WIPINL syonis §agaxvyquyy 3dA}4) S991 UasuIADT snsyjoqoupy (9981 ‘wey, vyvajns *s) dA) QOQI UsISWI[eP auDsos: (6161 “urey 2uoyiy “s edAy) 6161 uljJoquieyy) SNULOIOISIYIS! (gLQ1 “Ix v990019 “gq 2041) gLai aqnsr) snwos0p) yg (S761 "g 2 “gq syvsoyy “gq ed4y) E61 AsjayIOg w% AapoysIog sapipjaqvsopnasg (Sggi WoITM, pnugis sapyjaqog' 2dAy) 6261 vAOyUOUUY Sapijjaqusy (0981 IQ) suosfiyna0 “py adh) QOgI UoIswyeyl aauyqup (g161 ‘sny vyvuuadiq *q 2dA}) g161 sauosny sdqistjo1ag (9981 “wey, 90290] “T eda) gggi uossupeyy] 29 GisdT (LAg1 uruniste) mys -najomoy sianygup ad4}) gz61 eAoyuouuYy vjoWUDd cz : (L161 gjssopy voru0dvl *y 2d43) L161 92]ssopy vyztiuvsiygup tikes ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM IIo you proxy ‘vy;diuvs (qyjoours [[e) SIOZ] wlwos *y adhy) -oimpy jo wAuouds 3 z gS | é é é Mae. F BL eyo-ry ty hi a OBI ysIOPT DivUy) py (gz61 (yoows ]]v) ‘sny vunrysts "pr adAy) é Sig <2 é ou é ‘ad& ¢ 61 959 0 -. Moows ou gz61 r0u0Sny ee 98 ‘Bqy suylspas *y adh}) é é a. en é MS of FR OO Oe eg d d L9gi S1oqury sapundiy (poaoois oueIq (1261 puv yjoours) -UI9UI ‘uog Diafiunsquau *y adAy) ou +41 é é é mS 6 I 5h) 2 — ‘pepo om 1661 weyuog spyzdup (gSgi sreg IIA-A (y}oouIs) Dypssiaxas sapyjaqns ad4}4) ‘a9 Teue aed 1 sod sl “Ou “ou “ou ur‘sd § ‘sad €< VI 9D) - Moouws ou 9981 UoIsueyPy vY;diDS (yjoours) ; (SQQr “TOW 2aqnas +5: ad Aq) ‘Ld Jeue ved 1 sad ate 2 é " é ‘sad S-€ VI 9 DO 2 - Yoows sok Sggi ysowupopy sesdoyztuny Ba -j2qvs jo wiAuouds IIA (asoyjided (g161 ‘aeTyouRlIq uws99M}0q THA SA Il) ‘snYy 2zplsapny ‘q add) ovyided jerprrydou 3 = ou II é é ou ur‘sid § ‘sud~? 36 1 OD - @ asoided ou 9161 s9UasNY aosuvydupijg IIIA (Sgr sieg ‘aeIyoUuRIq UsI9M10q ‘ILA ‘A. (qj00uNs []{z) 040414190390 DIVaqQDS & 2dAq) aeyided jerprydsu ¢ ou 41 ‘2 ou ou ou ursid § ‘sadboo1 11 yy QO - () asopided ou 9fe1 sprempy—y sapyyjaqvs "A pue AJ (vP61 s]UsUISaS UO ov}OS (q}OOUIS ][z) ‘[nNeD sisuainpowu ‘gq 2044) ou ynq_ erpodojoNY ou II a = ou é ‘sd. T= 11.) = =s—9 Wool ou Pr61 Aray[NeDQ aspupiwg “‘poyipowl ZI yUOU IIA : (4161 “Sas o10v10Yy} sno ‘TA ‘A (qjOOuUIS ][z) J[SsoFT tuaum “5 adj) -1081I0UN joavj}aso}ONN sah It au Ou OU sid:s ‘sid VG -51 — 9-5) 7. = = WjOouls, Ou L161 o]ssoFyT sesdouvsos ia ct wn e) > = Sp 8 5 4 Z po ese a ee Qu ae Ae e ae) a Oo 3 a. O35 g ee ei 5. a 2 ade PAT 5 & | 5 Bo =8 oe 8 SS = a Se Q¢ SYIVUIDY 5" 2 ee ee eo. oempurig 6 46 syusUIs9s sojovjue} Ff 5 sotoads-adAy = Be ae = Ba -& Jouonvieg ceaong = ° pue snuesy = 7) 4 ° fe) B.0 + Suuey oS mee ng ABB 5 ag S 5 Sao 5 2 xe) ©) Cc i) (e) >} = ie) & a e a 5 5 “panurjuoI—J{ AAV, II! A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) “xpjgouaymnpy jo wtAuouds ¢ ‘*SUOT turoaun JO MOL 4sIIq ‘pooeyd AjjeajusA pue SUOT Tursun JO MOI 4SITJ “polyIpoul ov08 pure jesiop 6 juoul -S9S 910¥10Y4} sno -1981I0UN JO 9¥}9SOJON] “munwuojsouny gay jo wAuouAds § *sopoR} -u2} yNOYs Moy AOA VW ‘11d10 Teue red 1 EL aE JO} sjis jo sured V soats Q661 JOANeA]y ‘oeyided jeue “jo. opm Vv “‘posuo] -o1d oqo], svlnovj}uUaT, ‘11119 Teue sared I TIA pue JA sj}uoUrsas us9M4oq ISP [esIOp V ou ou ou [jews GI “Ee GI Cs oI 1g GS-62 61 ou ou ou ou Maj ou ou ou ou (qy}O0O0UuIS) é ‘sid & (q30ouls) a ‘sid & (qoous ¢) é ‘sad & (umouyun) é "sid -§ IIIA-A_ (qi00uIs ][z) ur ‘sid ‘sid (yoouis ][z) é x sad (yoours [[e) é ‘sid § (posuey puv yj}oouIs) é ‘sad & (yOOUIS [][z) é ‘sid & XI ‘IIIA ‘TIA ‘A (qjoours [Te) ut ‘sid ‘sid & IIIA ‘IIA ‘A (qiOourS T[e) ut ‘sad & ‘sad € GI ol LE II ol oI oI GI GI >) - - Yoous YO - - woous Fa gas yoous ‘) 2 2a & cous OO SRS he ae IS h 9. 9 —g Woourns ote 5 a ee Se = —— US yO 2 - qoous QO - - 9asoyrded 90 0 d easopided ou ou ou ou ou ou ou ou ou ou (1261 ‘uog 2uosjau “Py 2dA}) 1c61 weyuog saplouurpapy (4981 "Tym 292249 “py odAq) L9QI sioTyy xvjdouayanpy (SG61 ‘IT wsuagsyom -py 3d4}) CG61 uoselly vesnyy (SS61 ‘ITq Snssojgossvu “py dA) CG61 uoselly sapispyzdup (481 P24 suassajyjog vyjduns add) S991 UdSUIADT wnwojsouvygdjy (9661 feane ¥q 27jauva adqisd'] adAq) CG61 uoselpy adqisdjoq (Sggr ‘PI vafiavd «a dh) Cegi YysoUpI, vY;Zdiuvsnzy (€Lg1 “INA. vyosuoja “5 3dA2) ELQI [MIVA DyayIdUDS (6161 ‘wey snsaposap “gq 2041) 6161 ulpioquieyy szqvug (E161 Tyg snjosuoja sapyjagos adA}) LiGI J]SsoFT saprpjaqvsoany (L$61 ‘uouuy voa *py adA}) LE61 VAOYUIUUY aaivyguipuurjayy I12 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Key to genera of Ampharetinae I. 10. Il. 12. 13, 4 pairs of gills 3 pairs of gills 2 pairs of gills; first row fe uncini ite ae Glandular ridges on prostomium. Buccal tentacles always smooth and grooved along one side No glandular ridges on prostomium. Buccal Buen citer sical or papillose Notopodial cirri present No notopodial cirri 14 uncigerous thoracic segments .. II uncigerous thoracic segments .. 14 uncigerous thoracic segments 13 uncigerous thoracic segments II uncigerous thoracic segments 14 uncigerous thoracic segments 13 uncigerous thoracic segments 12 uncigerous thoracic segments II uncigerous thoracic segments Notopodial cirri present Notopodial cirri absent Tentacles papillose. Abdominal notopodia seldom present Tentacles smooth and grooved. Abdominal notopodia always oe No nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge One nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge No specialized posterior notosetae or elevated notopodia. Over 30 abdominal segments .. . Specialized notosetae present in some Senos pocieniae ee Less than 20 abdominal segments One nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge .. No nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge Tentacles smooth with a longitudinal groove. No nephridial papillae on the branchial ridge Tentacles papillose. 2 nephridial elles on the prance ee 14, uncigerous thoracic segments .. 13 uncigerous thoracic segments .. 12 uncigerous thoracic segments .. II uncigerous thoracic segments .. .. g uncigerous thoracic segments. Last avin ado plewied aad tee modified notosetae Glandular ridges on prostomium No glandular ridges on prostomium Abdominal notopodia present. Tentacles numerous and smooth. Paleae usually absent : Bt ni a ae fa Exe Abdominal notopodia absent. Tentacles represented by a folded membrane. Paleae usually absent : oe (With paleae, other characters unknown) Tentacles papillose Tentacles smooth . Adorsal ridge between ae Vi and VII. Paleae present on segment Ill a, No dorsal ridge. No setae on Seernene IIT . Tentacular lobe prolonged No elongate tentacular lobe Amphicteis Amage Parphypania Hypania Grubianella 7 Lysippe 8 12 Phyllamphicteis Lysippides 9 10 Ampharete Asabellides Phyllocomus II Sosane Sosanopsis Paramage Sabellides 14 Microsamytha 16 Glyphanostomum Mugga Samythopsis 15 Samytha Ampythas Aryandes 17 18 Melinnampharete Neosabellides Pabits Samythella A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 113 AMPHICTEIS Grube 1851 Synonyms Crossostoma Gosse 1855, ?Rytocephalus Quatrefages 1865, and Paramphicteis Caullery 1944. Prostomium with a pair of glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Four pairs of gilis. Segments ITI-VI without neuro- setae. Segment III often with paleae; segments IV—VI with notopodial capil- laries. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri present. Thoracic uncini with a single vertical series of teeth. Thirteen to 19 abdominal segments sometimes with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species Amphitrite gunneri Sars 1835. AMAGE Malmeren 1866 Prostomium with glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV—VI usually with notopodial capillaries. Eleven uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri present. Thoracic uncini with 1 or 2 series of teeth. Eight to 15 abdominal segments usually with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species Amage auriculata Malmgren 1866. PARHYPANIA Annenkova 1928 Prostomium with glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segment III often with paleae, segments IV—VI usually with notopodial capillaries. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. About 16-20 abdominal segments sometimes with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Amphicteis brevispinus Grube 1860. HYPANIA Ostrooumov 1897 Prostomium with glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segment III often with paleae, segment IV may have notosetae, segments V and VI always with notopodial capillaries. Thirteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. About 15-30 abdominal segments sometimes with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Amphicteis invalida Grube 1860. GRUBIANELLA McIntosh 1885 Prostomium with glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notopodial capillaries present on segments V and VI and sometimes on segment IV. Eleven uncigerous thoracic segments. Thoracic uncini usually with 2 series of teeth. Notopodial cirri doubtful. About 25 abdominal segments; the last few are reported to be swollen in the type but this is probably an abnormality. Type-species: Grubianella antarctica McIntosh 1885. II4 | ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM LYSIPPIDES Hessle 1917 Synonyms Amphisamytha Hessle 1917 and Hypaniola Annenkova 1928. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae present on segments V and VI and usually III and IV as well. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini with 1-3 series of teeth. Between 8 and 23 abdominal segments usually with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Amphicters fragilis Wollebaek 1912. PHYLLAMPHICTEIS Augener 1918 Synonym Paiwa Chamberlin 1919. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. Segments ITI-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae present on segments V and VI and usually on III and IV as well. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri present. Thoracic uncini with 1-3 series of teeth. _ Between 15 and 20 abdominal segments sometimes with rudimentary notopodia ~ as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Phyllamphicteis collaribranchis Augener 1918. LysIpPE Malmgren 1866 Synonym Pierolysippe Augener 1918. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four — pairs of gills. Segments IITI-VI without neurosetae. Small notosetae often present on segments III and IV and notosetae always present on V and VI. Thirteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Thoracic uncini with 2-3 series of teeth. Notopodial cirri absent. About 12-15 abdominal segments sometimes with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Lysippe labiata Malmgren 1866. AMPHARETE Malmgren 1866 Synonym Branchiosabella Claparéde 1863. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles papillose. Four — pairs of gills. No nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge. Segments II-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae of segment III usually enlarged to form paleae; notosetae of segment IV usually absent; notosetae of segments V and VI always present. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini usually with 2 series of teeth. About 12-15 abdominal segments which have uncigerous pinnules but usually lack rudimentary notopodia. Type-species: Amphicteis acutifrons Grube 1860. A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 115 ASABELLIDES Annenkova 1929 Synonym Pseudosabellides Berkely and Berkely 1943. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles papillose. Four pairs of gills. One nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge between the two groups of gills. Segments III—VI without neurosetae. Notopodial capillaries present on segments V and VI but usually absent from III and IV. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini usually with 2 series of teeth. About 21 abdominal segments which have unererreus pinnules but lack rudimentary notopodia. Type-species: Sabellides sibirica Wiren 1883. PHYLLOCOMuUS Grube 1878 Synonym Schistocomus Chamberlin 1919. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Four pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notopodial capillaries present on segments IV, V and VI. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. No specialized notosetae. Notopodial cirri present or absent. Thoracic uncini with a single series of teeth. Numerous (over 30) abdominal segments. Type-species: Phyllocomus crocea Grube 1878. SOSANE Malmeren 1866 Synonym Anobothrus Levinsen 1883. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. One nephridial papilla on the branchial ridge between the two groups of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae usually present on all four segments ITI to VI and often enlarged to form paleae on segment III. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments with one or more of the posterior noto- podia elevated and bearing specialized notosetae. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini with 1-2 series of teeth. About 13 abdominal segments usually with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Sosane sulcata Malmgren 1866. SOSANOPSIS Hessle 1917 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. No nephridial papillae on the branchial ridge. Segments ITI—-VI without neurosetae. Segments V and VI with notopodial capillaries and usually segment IV as well. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments with the last noto- podium elevated and bearing specialized notosetae. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini with 2-3 series of teeth. About 11 abdominal segments usually with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Sosanopsis wirent Hessle 1917. 116 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM PARAMAGE Caullery 1944 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Four pairs of gills. No nephridial papillae on the branchial ridge. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segment VI with notopodial capillaries but notosetae often absent from more anterior segments. Eleven uncigerous thoracic segments. No specialized posterior notosetae. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini usually with a single series of teeth. About 11 abdominal segments with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Paramage madurensis Caullery 1944. SABELLIDES Milne-Edwards 1838 Synonyms Heterobranchus Wagner 1885 and Pterampharete Augener 1918. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles papillose. Four pairs of gills. A pair of nephridial papillae on the branchial ridge between the two groups of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments V and VI with notopodial capillaries, segment IV usually fused to segment III and without notosetae, but notosetae often present on segment III. Eleven uncig- erous thoracic segments. No specialized posterior notosetae. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini with 1 or 2 series of teeth. Between 11 and 18 abdominal segments with uncigerous pinnules but no rudimentary notopodia. Type-species: ? Sabella octocirrata Sars 1835. — sAMYTHOPSIS McIntosh 1885 Prostomium with glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Three pairs — of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV—VI with notopodial ~ capillaries. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri doubcful. — About 22 abdominal segments which may have rudimentary notopodia as well — as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Samythopsis gruber McIntosh 1885. SAMYTHA Malmgren 1866 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles numerous and smooth. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV-VI with notopodial capillaries. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. No notopodial cirri. Thoracic uncini with 2-3 series of teeth. About 13 abdominal segments with rudimentary notopodia as well as uncigerous pinnules. Type-species: Sabellides sexcirrata Sars 1856. A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 117 AMYTHAS Benham 1921 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles replaced by a frilly membrane. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV—VI with notopodial capillaries. Fourteen uncigerous thoracic segments. No notopodial cirri. Thoracic uncini with 2 series of teeth. Fourteen or more abdominal segments without rudimentary notopodia above the uncigerous pinnules. ! Type-species: Amythas membranifera Benham 1921. ARYANDES Kinberg 1867 A questionable and incompletely described genus generally similar to Samytha but with paleae. Type-species: Aryandes gracilis Kinberg 1867. MICROSAMYTHA Augener 1928 Synonym ? Alkmaria Horst 1920. Note: Both genera are incompletely described and may belong to the family Terebellidae. More is known of Microsamytha and this name is retained pro tem. Prostomium without glandular ridges and ‘of the Ampharete type’. Buccal tentacles smooth. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV, V and VI with notopodial capillaries. Thirteen uncigerous thoracic segments. Between 13 and 19 abdominal segments. Type-species Microsamytha rychiana Augener 1928. MELINNAMPHARETE Annenkova 1937 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles papillose. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae usually present on all four segments (III-VI) and often enlarged to form paleae on segment ITI. A dorsal ridge between segments VI and VII. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. No notopodial cirri. ? number of abdominal segments. Type-species: Melinnampharete eoa Annenkova 1937. Neosabellides Hessle 1917 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles papillose. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae present on segments V and VI but usually absent from III and IV. No dorsal ridge between segments VI and VII. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. No notopodial cirri. Thoracic uncini usually with 2 series of teeth. About 19 abdominal segments. Type-species: Sabellides elongatus Ehlers 1913. 118 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM PABITS Chamberlin 1919 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth and borne on a long probosciform organ. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notosetae present on segments V and VI and usually on IV as well. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. No notopodial cirri. Thoracic uncini with 2 series of teeth. Number of abdominal segments unknown. Type-species: Pabits deroderus Chamberlin 1919. SAMYTHELLA Verrill 1873 Synonyms Eusamytha McIntosh 1685 and ? Eclysippe Eliason 1955. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth and not borne on an elongate tentacular lobe. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Notopodial capillaries present on segments IV-VI and sometimes on III as well. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri may be present on the last few thoracic setigers. Thoracic uncini with 1 or 2 series of teeth. Up to 36 abdominal segments. Type-species: Sampthella elongata Verrill 1873. GLYPHANOSTOMUM Levinsen 1883 Synonym Amythasides Eliason 1955. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth (? always). Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments IV—VI with notopodial capillaries and segment III sometimes with paleae. Eleven uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodial cirri absent. Thoracic uncini with 2 or more series of teeth. Twelve to 25 abdominal segments without rudimentary notopodia but with uncigerous pinnules. Type-species Samytha pallescens Theel 1878. MUGGA Eliason 1955 Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth. Three pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae but all of them may have notosetae. Nine uncigerous thoracic segments. Notopodium of the last thoracic segment dorsally situated and bearing modified notosetae. Thoracic uncini with more than 2 series of teeth. Number of abdominal segments unknown. Type-species: Mugga wahrbergi Eliason 1955. AUCHENOPLAX Ehlers 1887 Synonym Melinnoides Benham 1921. Prostomium without glandular ridges. Buccal tentacles smooth with a groove along one side. Two pairs of gills. Segments III-VI without neurosetae. Segments V and VI with notopodial capillaries. Twelve uncigerous thoracic segments and about 12-15 abdominal ones. First row of thoracic uncini on segment VII very long. Thoracic uncini with 1-2 series of teeth. Notopodial cirri absent. Type-species: Auchenoplax crinita Ehlers 1887. ~ 4 } é t A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY AMPHARETIDAE (POLYCHAETA) 119 SUMMARY The characters of existing genera are discussed and it is shown that confusion has arisen because the anterior segments have been telescoped and there are two different systems of numbering them. It is proposed that the separation of genera be based primarily on the number of gills and the number of uncigerous thoracic segments. The main diagnostic characters of 49 type- | species have been tabulated and it is suggested that 16 genera which are mostly monotypic be sunk. Keys and definitions of the remaining 33 genera are provided. REFERENCES ANNENKOVA, N. 1928. Ueber die pontokaspichen Polychaeten. 2. Die Gattungen Hypaniola, Parhypania, Farbicia und Manayunkia. Annu. Mus. zool. Akad. Leningrad 30: 13-20. ANNENKOVA, N. 1930. Zur Polychaetenfauna von Franz-Joseph-Land. (Melinnexis gen. nov. arctica sp. n.) Zool. Anz. 95: 269-272. AnNENKOVA, N. 1937. [The polychaete fauna of the northern part of the Japan Sea.] Jssled. Mor. USSR 23: 139-216. [In Russian. ] AuGENER, H. 1918. Polychaeta. In Michaelsen, W., ed. Beitrige zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas. 2: 67-625. Hamburg: Friederichsen. AuGENER, H. 1928. Beitrag zur Polychaetenfauna der Ostsee. @. Morph. Oekol. Tiere 14: 102-104. BENHAM, W. B. 1921. Polychaeta. Sci. Rep. Aust. antarct. Exped. (c), 6, 3: 1-128. BERKELEY, E. and C. 1943. Biological and oceanographical conditions in Hudson Bay. 11. Polychaeta from Hudson Bay. 7. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 6: 129-132. Cau.tery, M. 1944. Polychétes sédentaires de l’expédition du Siboga. [I1.] Siboga Exped. mon. 24 2bis: 1-204. CHAMBERLIN, R. V. 1919. The Annelida Polychaeta. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 48: 1-514. Day, J. H. 1955. The Polychaeta of South Africa. Part 3: Sedentary species from Cape shores and estuaries. 7. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 42: 407-452. Day, J. H. 1961. The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 6: Sedentary species dredged off Cape coasts with a few new records from the shore. 7. Linn Soc. (Zool.) 44: 463-560. En ers, E. 1887. Report on the annelids of the dredging expedition of the U.S. coast survey steamer Blake. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 15: 1-335. EHLERS, E. 1913. Die Polychaeten-Sammlungen der deutschen Siidpolar-Expedition 1901-1903. Dtsch. Siidpol.-Exped. 13: 397-598. Exiason, A. 1955. Neue oder wenig bekannte swedische Ampharetiden (Polychaeta). Goteborg, VetenskSamh. Handl. (7) 6B (16): 1-17. FAuvEL, P. 1897. Recherches sur les ampharétiens, annélides polychétes sédentaires. Morpholo- gie, anatomie, histologie, physiologie. Bull. sci. Fr. Belg. 30: 277-488. FAUVEL, P. 1927. Polychétes sédentaires. Faune Fr. 16: 1-494. FAuvEL, P. 1936. Polychétes. Result. Voy. Belgica Zool.: 1-44. Gosse, P. H. 1855. On new and little known marine animals. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (2) 163 31-35. Grim, O. A. 1877. [The Caspian Sea and its fauna.] Jn Grimm, O. A., ed. [Transactions of the Aralo-Caspian expedition.| 2: 1-168. S.-Petersburgh. [In Russian. ] Gruse, E. 1851. Die Familien der Anneliden. Arch. Naturgesch. 16: 249-364. Gruse, E. 1860. Beschreibung neuer oder wenig bekannter Anneliden. Arch. Naturgesch. 26: 71-118. Grusz, E. 1878. Einige neue Anneliden aus Japan. Jber. schles-Ges. vaterl. Kult. 55: 104-106. HeEsste, C. 1917. Zur Kenntnis der terebellomorphen Polychaeten. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 5: 39-258. Horst, R. 1920. Polychaete anneliden uit het Alkmaarder Meer. Zool. Meded. 5: 110-111. Kinser, J. G. H. 1867. Annulata nova. Ofvers. Vetensk Akad. Férh., Stockh. 23: 337-357- Levinsen, G. M. 1883. Systematik-geographisk oversight over de nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chaetognathi og Balanoglossi. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren Kbh. 2: 92-348. McIntosu, W. C. 1885. Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. Rep. Voy. Challenger 1873-76 (Zool.) 12: 1-554. I20 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM McIntTosu, W. C. 1914. Notes from the Gatty Marine Laboratory, St. Andrews No. 36, 4. On the British Ampharetidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (8) 13: 77-110. Ma.wmcren, A. J. 1865. Nordiska Hafs-Annulata. Ofvers. VetenskAkad. Forh. Stockh. 22: 355-410. Matmcren, A. J. 1866. Annulata Polychaeta Spetsbergiae, Groenlandiae, Islandiae et Scandinaviae hactenus cognita. Helsingforsiae. Meyer, E. 1887. Studien tiber den Korperbau der Anneliden. Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, 7: 592-741. MiLne-Epwarps, M. H. 1836-41. Les annélides. In Cuvier, G. Le regne animal distribué d’ aprés son organisation. [3rd ed.] 9. Paris: Masson. MULLER, Fr. 1858. Einiges tiber die Anneliden fauna der Insel Santa Catharina an der brasilia- nischen Kiiste. Arch. 1 Naturgesch. 24: 211-220. Nixsson, D. 1912. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Nervensystems der Polychaeten. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 1: 85-161. Ostromooumov, A. 1897. [Hydrobiological researches at the mouths of rivers in southern Russia. Preliminary communication.] Bull. Acad. Sci. St.-Pétersb. 6: 343-362. [In Russian. ] QuaTREFAGES, A. de. 1865. Histoire naturelle des anneles marins et d’eau douce. 1-2. Annélides et géphyriens. Paris: Roret. Sars, M. 1835. Beskrivelser og iagttagelser over nogle maerkelige eller nye i havet ved den Bergenske kyst levende dyr af Molypernes, Acalephernes, Radiaternes, Annelidernes og Molluskernes classer. Bergen. Sars, M. 1851. Beretning om en i sommeren 1849 foretagen zoologist reise i Lofoten og Fin- marken. Nyt Mag. Naturv. 6: 121-211. Sars, M. 1856. Fauna littoralis Norvegiae . . . 2: 1-24. Nye annelider. Bergen. THEEL, H. J. 1878. Les annélides polychétes des mers de Nouvell-Zemble. K. svenska Vetensk- Akad. Handl. 16 (3): 3-75. Uscuakov, P. V. 1955. [The polychaete worms of the far eastern seas of the U.S.S.R.] Tadl. anal. Faune U.R.S.S. 56: 1-445. [In Russian. ] VERRILL, A. E. 1873. Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish. 1: 295-778. Wacner, N. 1885. Die Wirbellosen des Weissen Meeres. Zoologisch Forschungen an der Kiiste — des Solowetzkischen Meerbusens in den Sommermonaten der Jahre 1877, 1879 und 1882. 1: 1-171. Leipzig. WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1949. Polychaetes of the Iranian Gulf. Dan. sci. Invest. Iran 4: 247-400. WESENBERG-LunND, E. 1950. The Polychaeta of West Greenland, with special reference to the fauna of Nordre Strédmfjord, Kavne- and Bredefjord. Medd. Grd¢nland 151 (2): 1-171. Wiren, A. 1883. Chaetopdder fran Sibiriska Ishafvet och Berings Haf insamlade under Vega- — expeditionen 1878-79. Jn Nordenskidld, N. A. E. von. Vegaexpeditionens vetenskapliga Takttagelser . . . 2: 383-428. Stockholm. Wiren, A. 1885. Om zirkulations och digestions-organen hos Annelider of familjerna Amphareti- dae, Terebellidae och Amphictenidae. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 21: 1-58. WoLLEBAEK, A. 1912, Nordeuropaeiske Annulata Polychaeta. I. Ammocharidae, Amphicteni- dae, Ampharetidae, Terebellidae og Serpulidae. Skr. VidenskSelsk., Christ. 1911 (2): 1-144. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE OF CoNTENTs and SummARy. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 42 in. x 7 in. (7} in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (black type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Smitu, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. and ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ; oy tying rigs 4 AY F : * 4 oP ’ , - ~ ¥- + ry M id yr if i g . 4 7 . ‘ “4 4 - . x ~~ ? ty | ~ ‘ * 7 “— \ a“ % \ + Cal es 1) Cie. se? 5 » es j ‘é poe rae ead f Nace, J ey iL ih i id 4) i a MUS. COMP, ZOOL LIBRARY, JUN 2 4 1964 LIEUWE DIRK BOONSTRA HARVARD UNIVERSITY THE GIRDLES AND LIMBS OF THE PRISTEROGNATHID THEROCEPHALIA April 1964 April Volume 48 Band Fame 5 = © Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from The Librarian, South African Museum, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van Die Bibliotekaresse, Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK ite), ACe, 3> 5» Ds; AGE 5(2, 5, 7-9 t.p.i.), 6(1, t.—p.i.), 8, 9(1), 10(1, 3), 11(7), 21, 24(2) 31(1-2), 44(4) Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel R1.25 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty. Ltd. Die Rustica-pers Edms. Bpk. Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap Court Road, Wynberg, Cape MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY JUN 2 4 1964 THE GIRDLES AND LIMBS OF THE PRISTEROGNAGHIDRD THEROCEPHALIA UNIVERSITY. By LIiEUWE Dirk BOONSTRA South African Museum, Cape Town (With 50 text-figures and one Plate) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction : vette RQ Ainnosaurus paucidens oan. ao sp. nov. ep, Lee Material .. Py 2 - fe eZ Historical .. i sid ig Y126 General Morphology 3 MP ae. t26 Pectoral Girdle vd a Sai OG Humerus ty Ai at) 928 Ulna and Boda a Be 6: HaRZO Carpus and Manus .. af SRG 0) Pelvic Girdle .. si be nt i at Femur ; ve Sion ek Tibia, Fibula med Fes my, Eanes 627! Systematic Descriptions of Specimens .. 136 A. Pectoral Girdle .. y eee SO B. Humerus .. = Bae 7: Be C. Lower Forelimb ed Pecciaut ae 150 D. Pelvic Girdle me ed ea 515) E. Femur ; Ser THO F. Lower Hind Limb rac Bes ee Oo Discussion .. oy if Ns my) OA Summary .. : ee is shee’ Acimowledeements he ay sath OS Keferences .. ai sus Pe cia DOS INTRODUCTION In the Tapinocephalus zone of the Karoo the oldest Therocephalia known are well represented. The Therocephalia form the main component of the carnivores, the only other carnivores being the very large anteosaurs represented by five genera and a few small to medium-sized Gorgonopsia represented by 10 genera, of which 30 specimens are known in all. The Therocephalia are represented in the Tapinocephalus zone by the families Pristerognathidae, Lycosuchidae, Scylacosauridae and Scaloposauridae. Of these the pristerognathids are the dominant family and are well represented in numbers of specimens as well as in the number of distinct species. Hitherto 16 genera with 28 species have been described. Most of the specimens consist of partly preserved snouts, with good complete skulls few in number. Of the postcranial skeleton little is known, for only rarely are some of the postcranial 121 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (5), 1964: 121-165, 50 figs. and 1 Plate. r22 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM bones preserved and then mostly associated with cranial parts difficult to classify. In this paper I present an account of the girdle and limb material in the South African Museum mostly collected by myself since 1928. This collection includes material which necessitates the establishment of the following new genus and species. ZINNOSAURUS new genus Type-species: Kinnosaurus paucidens. Diagnosis: A medium-sized pristerognathid with the dental formula i.5, c.1, pce.2; the incisors are fairly weak and well spaced and the postcanines are weak and lie far apart; the postcanines situated on a thin lappet of the maxilla clearly demarcated from the general maxillary surface. Scapula with a well- developed flange-like process on its posterior border immediately above the glenoid for the scapular head of the triceps. The glenoid widely open and facing much laterally. Humerus with greatly expanded epicondyles, thin and sheet- like. Femur with broadly oval caput and strong thickened internal trochanter. Affinities: Nearest relative Glanosuchus. Kimnosaurus paucidens new species (Figs. 1, 19, 28, 46d and 46e) Holotype. S.A.M. 12185, skull with lower jaw, scapulo-coracoid, humeri, ends of femora. | Locality: Meyerspoort, Beaufort West, South Africa. Horizon: High Tapinocephalus zone, Lower Beaufort Beds, Karoo. I have great pleasure in naming this new genus after H. Zinn, who has, as techinical assistant, accompanied me on numerous collecting trips in the T apinocephalus zone. The scapulo-coracoid, humeri and ends of femora of the holotype are — described in the appropriate sections of this paper. MATERIAL In the South African Museum catalogue 219 specimens of pristerognathids from the Tapinocephalus zone are listed. Of these only the following 37 specimens ~ have parts of the girdles and limbs preserved. Taken together one gets a good © idea of the family character of these structures. : The material studied consists of the following specimens listed in the order of the date of acquisition by the South African Museum collection. S.A.M. 4335. Pristerognathus sp. Beaufort West. High? Tapinocephalus zone. Coll. — Whaits 1916? Incomplete coraco-scapulae, distal and proximal ends of a — humerus and the proximal halves of an ulna and radius. No skull. GIRDLES AND LIMBS OF THE PRISTEROGNATHID THEROCEPHALIA 123 S.A.M. 5018. Pristerognathus sp. Abrahamskraal, Prince Albert. Low Tapino- cephalus zone. Coll. Haughton 1916. Two incomplete ilia, proximal and distal halves of two femora and of two humeri, proximal ends of tibiae, radii and ulnae. No skull. Fic. 1. / * a ; { ‘ ee Oe ) ‘ , 1 ” . 2 I Ue $i r iv t a: ay d MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY M.-L. WAPENAAR & F. H. TALBOT MAY 29 1964 HARVARD UNIVERSITY, NOTE ON THE RIGIDITY OF THE PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAIRA INDICA (CQUVIER) April 1964 April Volume 48 Band Past: 26°@:,..Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad Ve The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from The Librarian, South African Museum, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van Die Bibliotekaresse, Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1(1-2), 2(1, 3, 5 7), 3(%), 5(@@ 5, 79; t.-p.1.), 6(1, t.—p.1.), 8, 9(1), 10(1, 3)s 11(7), 21, 24(2) 31(1-2), 44(4) Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 35¢ Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty. Ltd... Die Rustica-pers Edms. Bpk. Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap Court Road, Wynberg, Cape “~_ =—a MUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY MAY 29 1964 ARVARD NOTE ON THE RIGIDITY OF THE PECTORAL BIN esis MAKAIRA INDICA (CUVIER)* By Mary-Louise WAPENAAR & FRANK HAMILTON TALBOT South African Museum (With 1 plate and 7 figures in the text) ABSTRACT It has been known for a long time that the pectoral fin of the black marlin, Makaira indica, cannot be folded flat against the side of the body as it can in all other istiophorid fishes. The anatomy of the pectoral girdle of the black marlin is here compared with that of the striped marlin, M. audax, to determine the mechanism of the rigid joint. The osteology and musculature of the pectoral girdle of both species is described and discussed, with particular reference to the articular region. It is concluded that the bony structure of the joint and the strength and disposition of its fibrous connective tissue sheath together ensure the rigidity of the pectoral fin in M. indica. It is suggested that the rigid pectoral fin of M. indica is used as a plane of elevation. I. INTRODUCTION Ever since Nakamura (1938) and, more particularly, Gregory & Conrad (1939) showed that the black marlin Makaira indica (Cuvier) has a rigid pectoral fin which cannot be folded flat against the body, while all other istiophorids have a folding pectoral fin, the reason for such a difference, and the structural features that prevent the fin from folding in the black marlin, have been a source of speculation among ichthyologists. The pectoral fin of marlins is in the main an inflexible, sickle-shaped structure with a narrow leading edge formed by the sharp edge of the strong marginal ray, and a small movable posterior lobe formed by the last ten rays or actinosts. In all marlins it is set at an angle of about 35° to the horizontal, so that when extended at right angles to the body it acts as a plane of eleva- tion by presenting a horizontal or oblique surface to the direction of flow of the water rather than a vertical surface as in many teleosts. In all istiophorids other than M. indica the fin can be rotated from the extended position to lie flat against the side of the body, but in M. indica the fin is permanently extended and cannot be folded against the body without structural damage, for which considerable force must be used. An anatomical study was undertaken in which the pectoral girdle of M. indica was compared with that of the striped marlin, M. audax (Philippi), to * This paper formed part of the Oceanography Symposium held during the 61st Annual Congress of the South African Association for the Advancement of Science at Durban, July 1963. The association has kindly given permission for publication here. 167 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (6), 1964, 167-180, pl. II., 7 figs. 168 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM determine the reason for the rigidity of the pectoral fin in M. indica. The articular regions of the pectoral girdles of M. albida (Poey) and M. nigricans (Lacépéde) were also examined. Nakamura (1938), Gregory & Conrad (1939), LaMonte & Marcy (1941), LaMonte (1955), J. L. B. Smith (1956), Robins (1957), Robins & de Sylva (1961), and Talbot & Penrith (1962) and others have referred to the rigidity of the pectoral fin of M. indica, but only one attempt to investigate this feature on an anatomical basis has been made (Morrow, 1957). Morrow states that the rigidity of the fin in M. indica is due to three bony pads associated with the articular surface of the marginal ray of the fin, giving it a rigid three-point suspension and thus preventing it from being rotated and folded back as occurs in the other species. In our opinion this explanation is untenable, for reasons which are given below. II. MATERIAL Makaira indica (Cuvier) (a) ‘Two loose girdles, fresh, of a 600 lb. fish, length 2,935 mm., taken aboard the fishing vessel Karimona by longline west of Slangkop, Cape Peninsula, 30/1/1962. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23194. (b) Anterior half, fresh, of an 800 Ib. fish, length 3,210 mm., taken aboard the fishing vessel Walvis Pioneer by longline 40 miles west of Cape Point, 28/1/1962. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23193. (c) Anterior half, fresh, of a 462 lb. fish, length 2,540 mm., taken on rod and line 25 miles west-north-west of Cape Point, 25/2/1962. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23244. (d) Prepared girdle of a 1,028 lb. fish taken by longline south-west of Hout Bay, March 1961. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23054. Makara audax (Philippi) ' (a) Anterior half, fresh, of a 130 lb. fish, length 2,120 mm., taken aboard the fishing vessel Overberg by longline west of Cape Point, 2/2/1962. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23197. (b) Prepared girdle of small specimen taken west of Hout Bay by longline, March 1961. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23052. Makara nigricans (Lacépéde) (a) Prepared girdle of large specimen taken aboard the fishing vessel Cape Point by longline 45 miles north-west of Dassen Island, 29/6/1961. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23104. Makaira albida (Poey) (a) Prepared girdle of specimen taken by longline south-west of Hout Bay, March 1961. S.A.M. Reg. No. 23053. RIGIDITY OF PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAIRA INDICA (CUVIER) 169 III. OsTEOLOGY OF THE PECTORAL GIRDLE OF JM. audax AND M. indica The pectoral girdle of marlins (figs. 1, 2) is suspended from the skull by a three-pronged post-temporal and a long, flat supra-cleithrum, and is typical in consisting of a complex of three bones. There is an anterior cleithrum which has medial and lateral flanges or arms, a rod-like ventral process which meets that of the opposite side in the mid-ventral line, and two dorsal processes, an anterior, rod-like one and a posterior expanded process. The posterior bone of the complex is the coracoid, which is roughly triangular. From its antero- dorsal corner a ridge runs ventro-caudally. Above the ridge is the dorsal process of the coracoid; the ventral process of the coracoid meets the cleithrum just above the ventral process of that bone. Dorso-medially between the cleithrum and the coracoid lies the scapula, a fairly small semicircular bone perforated by the scapular foramen, through which the nerves supplying the abductor musculature of the fin pass. The scapula bears the articular surfaces for the pectoral fin. No bony pads such as those described by Morrow (1957) were found in any of the South African specimens of M. indica. If they are not present in all specimens it seems unlikely that those found by Morrow are of any significance in the mechanism of the rigid joint. The pectoral complex is very similar in M. indica and M. audax, with a major difference in the articulation of the fin (described below in section V), anterior dorsal process of cleithrum posterior dorsal process of cleithrum articular surface for Bb . ; marginal ray rsal proces: of coracoid * cleithrum scapula , dorsal process of coracoid scapular foramen coracold ridge medial arm of cleithrum lateral arm of cleithrum ventral process of cleithrum yentral process of coracoid Medial view Lateral view : Fic. 1. Pectoral girdle of Makaira indica. 170 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM anterior dorsal process of cleithrum posterior dorsal process of cleithrurm articular surface for marginal ray *» clelthrum articular surface (i urface for marginal ray scapula , coracold ridge er dorsal process of coracoid ‘Re dorsal process of coracold scapular foramen medial arm of cleithrum lateral arm of cleithrum coracold ” - ventral process of cleithrum t vanieal prerate of coracol Fic. 2. Pectoral girdle of Makaira audax. and other minor differences. In M. audax the anterior edge of the cleithrum is concave, while in M. indica this edge is almost straight, with the ventral process of the cleithrum somewhat backwardly directed. The coracoid ridge is shorter and heavier in M. indica than in M. audax, and the dorsal process of the coracoid is pointed in the former and rounded in the latter. The scapular foramen is relatively larger in M. audax than in M. indica. ~ “eee, » » ie IV. MuscuLATURE OF THE PECTORAL GIRDLE OF JM. indica AND M. audax (figs. 3, 4, 5) The musculature of the pectoral girdle of M. indica and M. audax was investigated. The body muscles and the muscles between the pectoral girdle © and the head and visceral skeleton were found to be identical in M. indica and M. audax and will not be included here. The musculature of the pectoral girdle consists as in all fishes of adductor : and abductor portions (Shann, 1919), which draw the fin towards and away from the body respectively. Both portions are more or less divided into superficial and deep parts, although these are often not easily separable. The abductor musculature arises from the lateral surface of the scapula and the coracoid, and the lateral surface of the medial flange of the cleithrum, and inserts on the marginal ray and the bases of the remaining rays of the fin. For most of their length from their fleshy origin the superficial and deep fibres are not clearly separable, but towards their insertion they become more distinct and have a separate tendinous insertion on the bases of the rays, the deep fibres inserting on the ventral extremities of the bases of the rays while the superficial fibres insert on a slight ridge a short distance above the bases of the rays. The last ten rays are movable in relation to the rest of the fin and have a fairly specialized musculature, some of which inserts on the radials supporting them (described below, section V). The adductor musculature arises from the medial surface marginal ray cleithrum fateral arm of cleithrum coracoid Superficialis marginal ray cleithrum lateral arm of cleithrum coracoid Profundus Fic. 3. Abductor musculature of Makaira indica. ventral lobe of fin ventral lobe of fin 172 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM of the cleithrum, scapula, and coracoid, and also has a tendinous insertion on the bases of the rays on the medial side of the fin. As in the case of the abduc- tor musculature, the adductors of the last ten rays are separate and very well - developed. An additional adductor, present in many fishes, the coracoradialis marginal ray cleithrum ventral lobe of fin coraco-radialis muscle coracold Superficialis marginal ray scapula cleithrum * ventral lobe of fin Profundus Fic. 4. Adductor musculature of Makaira audax. RIGIDITY OF PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAIRA INDICA (CUVIER) 173 Marginal ray cleithrum ventral lobe of fin coraco-radialis muscle coracoid Fic. 5. Adductor superficialis musculature of Makaira indica. muscle, arises from the medial surface of the coracoid and inserts on the last two radials. In general the abductor and adductor portions are very similar in M. indica and M. audax (figs. 3, 4, 5). In M. indica the superficial and the deep abductor of the marginal ray form a bundle clearly separated from the abductors of the remaining fin rays, while in /. audax the abductors for the marginal ray are not distinct. In both species the last ten rays form a distinct lobe witha separate and well-defined musculature; the abductor portions of the muscula- ture of this lobe are identical in the two species. There are certain differences in the adductor musculature of the two species (figs. 4, 5); again in M. indica the adductors of the marginal ray are clearly defined and in addition have a slightly different origin, arising from the posterior dorsal process of the cleithrum rather than from the medial arm of the cleithrum. In general the adductor muscles in M. audax are arranged so that the fibres are relatively longer than in M. indica. The greatest difference is in the adductor musculature of the ventral lobe, with which the present 174 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM discussion is not concerned as it has no bearing on the mechanism of the rigid joint. This lobe clearly has important hydrodynamic effects on the fin, however, and one would expect its mode of action to differ in two species in which the action of the fin as a whole differs strongly. The adductor and abductor muscles then are responsible for the movements of the pectoral fin. By contraction of the abductors other than those of the ventral lobe the antero-ventral tip of the fin-base is pulled forward and down- ward. In M. audax (pl. II) this movement causes the fin to be pulled away from the body into the extended position. This actually involves two movements, the drawing downwards of the antero-ventral tip of the fin base and the drawing forwards of the fin as a whole so that the direction of the fin tip is at right angles to the direction of the body, but both movements occur simultaneously in M. audax. In the extended position in M. audax either movement can be carried out; by twisting, the plane of the fin to the water can be altered by about 10°, and the leading edge can move through any arc between the fully extended position and the folded position. Fic. 6. Range of movement of fin in Makatra indica. In M. indica (fig. 6), where the fin is permanently extended, two limited movements are possible, and are also brought about by the abductor and adductor muscles. The angle of incidence of the fin plane to the water can be altered within an arc of about 4°, brought about by the pulling down by the abductors of the antero-ventral tip of the marginal ray base; the fin is also capable of an antero-posterior movement in a horizontal plane through an ee ee ce at a RIGIDITY OF PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAITRA INDICA (CUVIER) 175 angle of 12°. It can thus be seen that the range of movement is far more limited in M. indica than in M. audax. It would be anatomically unusual if the rigidity of the fin were dependent on the musculature. This would imply continual sustained muscle activity to hold the fin rigid during forward movement of the fish; that is, during most of its life. The total extension of a muscle group is never limited by its own action alone (Professor L. H. Wells, personal communication). The maximum extension is normally limited by the structure (ligament, cartilage and bone) of the joint itself. If they were not limited in this way, the structure of muscle fibres is such that on relaxation they could expand until damaged. If muscles held the fin rigid in the black marlin it would also follow that in a freshly dead specimen the fin should be able to move back against the body, even if the muscle fibres were damaged in so doing. This is not the case. As would be expected, therefore, the structure of the joint itself and not the muscles is the limiting factor to further backward movement. In any joint the arrangement of the muscles will depend on the amount of movement allowed by the arrange- ment of the bones and ligaments of the joint. Thus in M. audax, where the range of possible movement of the fin is more extensive, the muscle fibres are longer than in M. indica. The fin musculature of M. indica is very well developed in spite of the small range of movement of the fin. It is suggested that while the fin of MZ. audax encounters little water resistance in the initial stages of its extension, water pressures render considerable muscular effort necessary for moving the fin when it is extended. It is these latter movements with which the muscles of M. indica are concerned, so that they must be well developed, as well developed as in M. audax, in fact. Short fibres are adequate for these short-range movements, however. The main point arising from the study of the pectoral musculature is that, if the abductors of M. audax are contracted, the pectoral fin can be maintained in the same position as that of MW. indica, but in M. indica the fin is maintained in this position even when the abductor muscles are relaxed and the adductors contracted. The muscles do not assist in rendering the joint rigid; as would be expected, M. indica has developed some method of maintaining the rigid position of the fin other than by sustained muscular contraction. V. ARTICULATION OF THE PECTORAL FIN (fig. 7) The most significant difference in the pectoral complex lies in the arrange- ment and shape of the articular surfaces for the pectoral fin. In M. audax, M. nigricans, and M. albida the articular surface for the base of the marginal ray lies on the dorsal edge of the scapula; its surface is markedly convex and curves smoothly from the lateral to the medial surface of the bone; in other words it is saddle-shaped. The base of the marginal ray in these species is concave to correspond with its articular surface on the girdle. In M. indica the articular I 76 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM surface for the marginal ray, although close to the dorsal edge of the scapula, lies entirely on the lateral surface and is flat, so that a limited amount of sliding but no rolling movement is possible. The base of the marginal ray in this species is correspondingly flat. The dorsal edge of the scapula above the articular surface (which surface is occupied by the inner half of the saddle- shaped articular surface in M. audax) is here extremely rugose and pitted for the attachment of connective tissue. In all four species there is at the posterior end of the articular surface for the marginal ray a shallow trough, which receives a downward process of the articular surface of the marginal ray base. This trough lies mainly on the dorsal edge of the scapula. Posterior to the articular surface for the marginal ray are the articular surfaces for the radials (fig. 7). The radials are very similar in all four species. They are four in number, the first two being short and cubical, and the posterior two rather long and slender and forming the base of the posterior lobe of the fin. Their articulation lies mainly on the dorsal edge of the scapula; that of the anterior dorsal process of cleithrum marginal ray posterior dorsal process of cleithrum articular surface scapula Y_ articular surface for ; Zz marginal ray radials bases of fin rays dorsal process of coracoid coracoid ridge lateral arm of cleithrum medial arm of cleithrum Fic. 7A. Articular region of pectoral girdle of Makaira indica. RIGIDITY OF PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAIRA INDICA (CUVIER) 177 anterior dorsal process posterior dorsal process of cleithrum of cleithrum Marginal ray articular surface articular surface for marginal ray scapula bases of fin rays radials dorsal process of coracoid lateral arm of cleithrum coracoid ridge medial arm of cleithrum Fic. 7B. Articular region of pectoral girdle of Makaira audax. first two is an area of attachment rather than articulation, most movement taking place between their distal ends and the bases of the rays. The third and fourth radials are slightly more movable, and movement is possible between the second and third radials in all species. The distal ends of the first two radials are smoothly curved in M. audax, allowing free movement of the rays over them, but are strongly rugose and pitted in M. indica for the attachment of connective tissue. The last ten rays are movably articulated on the distal ends of the third and fourth radials in both species. In both M. audax and M. indica the pectoral fin is held to its articular surfaces by a connective tissue sheath, but this sheath shows significant differ- ences in the two species. In M. audax the ligaments are elastic and loosely arranged so as to allow maximum movement of the joint, but in M. indica a very strong sheath of interwoven fibrous tissue is developed which holds the fin strongly to its articular surfaces; the fibres are short and their area of attach- ment to the bone is more extensive than in M. audax. 178 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM VI. Discussion No features of the osteology of the pectoral girdle other than the articular region suggested a mechanism for maintaining the rigidity of the fin. The muscu- lar system, although showing differences connected with the movements carried out by the fin in the two species compared, is not adapted to hold the fin away from the body in M. indica. It is suggested that the only difference between the pectoral girdles in M. indica and the other species studied which is large enough to be of significance in the functioning of the joint of the pectoral fin lies in the position and confor- mation of the articular surfaces of the fin, in particular that for the marginal ray, and in the development of the connective tissue of the joint. Owing to the flat, lateral articular surface for the marginal ray base of the fin of M. indica, the fin cannot roll back so that its base rests on the dorsal edge _of the scapular, without leaving its articular surface; to prevent it from being forced off its articular surface by the pressures it encounters in the extended position, a very strong connective tissue sheath is developed around the joint. This tough connecting sheath prevents the fin from lying back against the body. If the fin is forced back against the body in a dead specimen, an operation requiring considerable force, the connective tissue sheath is torn. The bones, including the radials, are undamaged, suggesting that there can be no bony locking or strutting device for maintaining the rigidity of the fin. After the ligaments have been broken the fin can fold back considerably farther than before, but not completely as in the other species; it is stopped by the dorsal expansion of the marginal ray being jammed against the posterior edge of the posterior dorsal process of the cleithrum, which is slightly thickened in this species. Unless the ligamentous sheath is torn this position is not reached, so this is not a mechanism for holding the pectoral fin rigid. It is suggested that at some time and for some reason in its evolutionary history M. indica or its ancestors found it necessary to maintain the fin in a laterally extended position. This was presumably accomplished at first by muscular contraction sustained over long periods, but in time the tension was taken by greatly strengthening the connective tissue sheath attaching the fin to the girdle, and the inner portion of the girdle’s articular surface, which is used only when the fin lies against the side, was lost. The pectoral fin of the black marlin appears to act either as a stabilizer, or as a plane of elevation. The body is very large and deep, and it may be that some stabilizing factor is necessary during forward movement. The broadbill swordfish, Xiphias gladius, of similar body shape, also has rigid pectoral fins. However, if this is the reason for the modification, it is surprising that the blue marlin, Makaira nigricans, also a large, deep-bodied marlin, does not have rigid pectoral fins. The other possibility, that the fin acts as a plane of elevation during forward movement, deserves consideration. RIGIDITY OF PECTORAL FIN OF MAKAIRA INDICA (CUVIER) 179 It is interesting to speculate on the possible reasons for the necessity of such continuous lifting force. In pelagic surface teleosts very small marine species usually possess a well-developed closed swim bladder, but among many medium and large sized species, particularly in the Scombridae, it is variable or absent (Jones & Marshall, 1953). For example, in many species of the genus Thunnus, it is variably reduced or rudimentary; in Katsuwonus pelamis, Sarda lineolata, S. chiliensis, the genus Auxis, the genus Euthynnus and most species of the genus Scomberomorus, it is absent. It is probable that in fast-swimming forms which change depth rapidly a large swim bladder is a liability because of its necessarily slow change of volume. The absence or reduction of the swim bladder would necessitate some upward thrust to counteract the tendency to sink because of increased density. In such powerfully swimming fishes as the tunas and the marlins where forward movement may be continuous this presents little difficulty, and presumably the increased effort has not been too great to offset the advantage gained in vertical manoeuvrability. Preliminary examination (dissection of one black marlin and one striped marlin) showed that the swim bladder structure is very different between the two species, and that the black marlin seems to have a relatively smaller swim bladder. This work is being continued. It is therefore tentatively suggested that the black marlin has a reduced swim bladder, and that some upward thrust is supplied by the rigid pectoral fins. Comparison may be made here with the sharks. In this group the pelagic surface forms are large, and in the absence of a swim bladder upward thrust is obtained by the broad and rigid pectorals. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are indebted to the manager and skippers of the Atlantic Tuna Corporation and to Mr. F. Slack and Mr. W. Gilmore of the South African Marlin & Tuna Club for the specimens; to Dr. N. A. H. Millard of the Zoology Department of the University of Cape Town and Mr. M. J. Penrith of the South African Museum for advice and help; to Professor L. H. Wells of the Department of Anatomy, University of Cape Town, for advice on joints; and to all those who helped with the conveying and handling of the material. The Trustees of the South African Museum gratefully acknowledge the grant-in-aid towards the cost of publishing this paper made by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. REFERENCES Grecory, W. K., & Conran, G. M. 1939. Body forms of the black marlin and the striped marlin of New Zealand and Australia. Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. 76: 443-456. Jones, F. R. H., & MarsHatt, N. B. 1953. The structure and functions of the teleostean swim- bladder. Biol. Rev. 28: 16-83. LaMonte, F. R. 1955. A review and revision of the marlins, genus Makaira. Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. 107: 323-365. 180 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM LaMonte, F. R., & Marcy, D. E. 1941. Swordfish, sailfish, marlin, and spearfish. Ichthyol. Contr. internat. Game Fish Assoc. 1 (2): 1-24. (Not seen. Information from Morrow, 1957.) Morrow, J. E. 1957. On the morphology of the pectoral girdle in the genus Makaira. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 16 (2): 88-105. NakaAmurA, H. 1938. Report of an investigation of the spear-fishes of Formosan waters. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., Spec. Sci. Rpt. Fisheries, 153, 1955 : 1-46. Rosins, C. R. 1957. Charles F. Johnson Oceanic Gamefish Investigations, Progress Rpt. 4. Rosins, C. R., & De Syiva, D. P. 1961. Description and relationships of the longbill spearfish, Tetrapturus belone, based on western North Atlantic specimens. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Caribbean. 10 (4): 383-413. SHann, E. W. 1919. The comparative myology of the shoulder girdle and pectoral fin of fishes. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 52: 531-570. Suir, J. L. B. 1956. Swordfish, marlin and sailfish in South and East Africa. Ichthyol. Bull. 2, 25-33: Tatsor, F. H. & PenrirH, M. J. 1962. Tunnies and marlins of South Africa. Nature. 193, no. 4815: 558-559. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Plate II (6b) Extended position. Range of movement in Makaira audax. ee eee we we —— — ee ee ee INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE oF CoNTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 43 in. x 7 in. (7$ in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (black type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmiTH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Smiru, C. D. 1954. South African plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. and ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, Fuly 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). : f 0 — MUS. COMP. ZOO i - O Dt’ CiU™ - A ys 4 ay a LIBRARY OV 19 I¥o0 M. J. PENRITH mARKVARD UNIVERSITY, A NEW SPECIES OF FLAT FISH, MANCOPSETTA MILFORDI, FROM SOUTH AFRICA, WITH NOTES ON THE GENUS MANCOPSETTA September 1965 September Volume 48 Band Pare ..9 ~ Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(1, 3> 3 7-8), gli—2, 5» t-p-1), 5(2, 5» 7-9); 6(1, t Pele) 7(1, 2). 8, g(1-2), 10(1-3), r1(1-2,' 7, t-p.i), “21, 24(2); 95(—-a)e eee Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel anc Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur — The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap A NEW SPECIES OF FLATFISH, MANCOPSETTA MILFORDI, FROM SOUTH AFRICA, WITH NOTES ON THE GENUS MANCOPSETTA By M. J. PENRITH* South African Museum, Cape Town (With 2 figures in the text and 1 plate) CONTENTS agi ee PAGE Introduction . : F : 181 Mancopsetta milfordisp.n. . Specie ts Generic grouping : : nan oae ol Genus Mancopsetta . y oi 166 Distribution . ; ; ; 187 Acknowledgements. : OS tei: Summary : . : : 188 References : ; ‘ ters INTRODUCTION The genus Mancopsetia was proposed by Gill (1881) to replace the pre- occupied generic name Lepidopsetta used by Gunther (1880) when describing M. maculata, the first of the bothid fishes found which lacked pectoral fins. This “species has until now remained the only species in the genus and has been _ known from a very few specimens found in the Southern Hemisphere. The related genus Achiropsetta (Norman, 1930) was known from two species, both ‘rare and recorded only from the Southern Hemisphere. Recently the South African Museum was presented with two specimens of a bothid fish lacking pectoral fins. These have been assigned to the genus Mancopsetia. Mancopsetta milfordi sp. n. (fig. 1, pl. III) Material : S.A.M. 24041: trawled by a commercial trawler in 300 fathoms west of Cape Town. Standard length 393 mm. (Holotype). S.A.M. 23767: trawled by a commercial trawler in 370 fathoms west of Cape Town. Standard length 298 mm. The body is compressed, sinistral and fairly elongate, the maximum depth being about 22 in body length (excluding the caudal fin). The axial portion of the body is thickened relative to the rest of the body in the smaller specimen, * Seconded from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Oceanographic Unit, University of Cape Town. | 181 a ‘ Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (7), 1964, 181-188, 2 figs., 1 pl. VIP. ZOOL. FIDDARD. ain AR / LS {yop n a a ee % ae ee Vv KAT } on iy 182 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM but this seems to become less marked with increase in size as it is not noticeable in the larger specimen. The caudal peduncle is very short, being only 4 of the longitudinal diameter of the eye. There is a single straight lateral line on both sides with about 160 scales on the ocular side. The scales are ctenoid with normally eight to twelve spinules. Towards the edges of the fish, especially on or near the fins, the spinules project at an angle away from the body, but on the main trunk they lie flat. The entire head, including the jaws and part of the eyes, is covered with fine scales. The eyes are separated by a low, scaled, bony ridge. All fin rays, including the caudal, have a row of scales. The head from the tip of the maxilla to the hindermost edge of the oper- culum is contained 4 times in standard length, while the greatest diameters of the eyes (both eyes equal) are 4 the length of the head. The snout is slightly shorter than the eye diameter. There is a small fleshy growth over the front of the maxilla. The mouth reaches back to a point almost level with the posterior edge of the lower eye. Teeth are present on both sides of the jaw but are slightly better developed on the ocular side. The mouth has a very wide gape and is protrusible. The membranes on the ocular side are more protrusible than those on the blind side. There are nine small gill-rakers on the lower arch of the first gill. There is no trace of any pectoral fin on either side. The pelvic fin on the ocular side is larger than that on the blind side. On the eyed side the anterior base of the pelvic fin is median, while posteriorly the base is twisted to the left, i.e. on to the ocular surface of the body (fig. 1). The body proportions and meristic counts of the two specimens are given in Table I and compared with a specimen of M. maculata from the collection of the British Museum (Natural History) (Registered No. 1930.5.6: 41). The colour, preserved in formalin, is brown-grey with the anal and dorsal fins grey slate/blue. There is no trace of any pattern. TABLE I M. milfordi M. milfordi M. maculata Total length .. wif an << 456 334. - 239 Standard length a Me a 392 298 199 Greatest depth .. a bi ak 143 (364) - .g9'(392) 88 (442) Head length .. a On ee IOI (258) 76 (255) 53 (266) Length of snout : : oe 22 (56) 15 (50) 10 (50) Diameter of eye (hanconn ie ihe 24 (61) 20 (67) 17 (85) Interorbital width aa ae 54: 8 (17) 5 (15) 3 (15) Length of Maxillary bs ne 48 (122) 33 (111) 18 (go) Number of scales in lateral lige es 164 P77 119 ‘Dorsal rays... ve ae as 130 133 119 Anal rays fe nd at 109 110 98 ~ Pelvic rays, blind side .. us ste 6 6 5 Pelvic rays, ocular side bite Be G f) ri Gill-rakers, lower arch ae se 9 9. 12 Body proportions and meristic counts of M. milfordi and M. maculata. Body proportions in millimetres and in thousandths of standard length in parentheses. A NEW SPECIES OF FLATFISH, MANCOPSETTA MILFORDI 183 >> f 2p ~ 23>s toys ao: Ficure 1. Head of M. milfordi showing the twisting of the posterior portion of the left pelvic fin onto the ocular surface. Mancopsetia milfordi differs from M. maculata in the number of dorsal and anal rays and lateral line scales, the twisting of the posterior end of the left pelvic fin onto the ocular surface and in certain body proportions. It resembles M. maculata, however, in general body shape, especially head shape, and in the type of scales. The species is named for Mr. C. S. Milford, managing director of the trawling firm, Messrs. Irvin and Johnson (Pty.) Ltd., in recognition of generous support for marine biological research. GENERIC GROUPING According to Norman (1934) there are only two genera of bothids (both known only from the Southern Hemisphere) which lack both pectoral fins. 184 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM These two genera, Mancopsetta and Achiropsetia are said to differ in the following characters. .:.’. (a) Achiropsetta is said to have a flat scaled interorbital space, whereas that of Mancopsetta is stated to be a naked narrow bony ridge. (b) Achiropsetta is said to be more elongate and to have a thickened trunk. (c) In Mancopsetta the pelvic fin on the ocular side is not directed to the left posteriorly as is said to be the case in Achiropsetta. (d) In both genera the scales are small and ctenoid, but in Mancopsetta the 8-14 spinules lie flat, whereas in Achiropsetta there are only one or two spinules which are directed away from the body. These differences would seem to be clear cut, but the finding of a second species of Achiropsetta, A. slavae (Andriashev, 1960) and the present species have suggested that the differences between the genera are not so marked as was formerly thought. Neither A. slavae nor M. milfordi fits completely the generic description of the genus in which it has been placed. The distribution of various taxonomic characters among the four species of bothids which lack pectoral fins is shown in Table II below. TABLE II Achiropsetta Mancopsetta tricholepis slavae maculata milfordi Dorsal rays bi At Me 2 132 114-117 116-119 130-133 Anal rays Le a ” 114 93-96 97-98 109-110 Lateral line scales : ae et ? 115 114-120 164-177 Depth in standard ieceie ar ar 2°4 2 a2 a | Gill-rakers in lower arch ae ie 9-10 12 12 9 Head in standard length e) a 4°5 ae, 3°8 4 Coloration A Ae Ae plain patterned patterned plain Fleshy lip on maxilla an ve {<) ) Hpresent present present present Spinules on scales é say, > wertieal vertical flat flat Pelvic fin of eyed side poercd ra the left yes no no yes Maximum known total length (mm.) 105 63 270 456 Smallest known total length (mm.) .. 100 48 134 334 Comparison of the four known species of bothid fishes which lack pectoral fins. From the table it is clear that the only important character that the two species of Achiropsetia have in common, and distinct from the two species placed in the genus Mancopsetia, is the unusual form of the scales with vertically projecting spinules. Although A. tricholepis is stated to have a flat scaled interorbital space (Norman, 1930, 1934), a specimen examined from the collection in the British Museum (1933.5.8: 1) shows a clear bony ridge. M. maculata on the other hand was said (Norman, 1934) to have a bony ridge without scales. In the specimen of M. maculata examined however, scale pockets were clearly present on the ridge. It seems likely that the scales were rubbed off in the trawl net. A scaled ridge is therefore present in M. maculata, M. milfordi and A. tricholepis. Nothing is known concerning this feature in A. slavae. A NEW SPECIES OF FLATFISH, MANCOPSETTA MILFORDI 185 Another difference, the thickened trunk in Achiropsetta, is most probably a function of size as it is present in Achiropsetta (of which only small specimens are known) and the smaller of the two M. milfordi but not in the larger nor in M. maculata. From the illustrations in Norman (1934) there is a strong suggestion of marked differences in the shape of the head in M. maculata and A. tricholepis but this is caused by illustrating the largest available example of the former species and the smallest of the latter. Figure 2 gives some idea of the changes of head shape that may occur in a species with an increase in size. « ES Ss " c/ ~, 1 F F TIA Ficure 2. Head shapes of various specimens of the genus Mancopsetta redrawn from various sources (not to scale). A. M. maculata of 238 mm. total length (After Norman, 1934). B. M. maculata of 134 mm. total length (After Gunther, 1880). C. M. milfordi of 334 mm. total length. D. M. slavae of 63 mm. total length (After Andriashev, 1960). E. M. slavae of 56 mm. total length (After Andriashev, 1960). F. M. tricholepis of 100 mm. total length (After Norman, 1930). 186 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM From the above it is evident that there is only one important and constant difference between the two genera Mancopsetta and Achiropsetta, viz. the type of spinules present on the scales. At the same time, however, there are several clear points of similarity between A. tricholepis and M. milfordi and again between A. slavae and M. maculata. It is extremely probable that the presence of vertically projecting spines in Achiropsetta is a larval or juvenile character as similar spines occur in many bothid larvae (Kyle, 1913). Andriashev (1960) holds a similar view and has stated ‘It is very probable that the peculiar prickliness of the body of Achiropsetta (that is, the strongly developed, vertically projecting spines) can be considered as a larval character of a caenogenetic nature’. He also noted the similarity in fin counts between A. slavae and M. maculata, as well as the fact that these two species had the most similar distribution. He concluded, however, that the specimens of A. slavae could not be assigned to the genus Mancopsetta since in the latter genus the body is not transparent and the scales do not have the vertically projecting spinules. Andriashev further states that it is not possible to explain these in terms of development, as the difference in size between the smallest M. maculata and the largest A. tricholepis is only 29 mm. The greatest similarities are, however, between M. milfordi and A. tricholepis, where the minimum difference between the two species is 229 mm., and between A. slavae and M. maculata, where the difference is 71 mm. _ While it is not possible at this stage in our knowledge of these fishes to suggest that A. tricholepis is actually the juvenile stage of M. milfordi or A. slavae that of M. maculata, it is suggested that for the reasons given above, and bearing in mind that these four species, in lacking pectoral fins, form a unique group within the family Bothidae, the species should not be separated into two genera but should rather be united into one genus, Mancopsetta. The differences between the species of the former genus Achiropsetta and those of Mancopsetia being far more likely due to growth rather than major genetic differences. The generic definition of Mancopsetta will, however, have to be modified from that given by Norman (1934), not only to include the species formerly placed in the genus Achiropsetta, but also the new species M. milfordi. Genus MANCOPSETTA Lepidopsetta (non Gill, 1864) Gunther, 1880, p. 18. Mancopsetta Gill, 1881. p. 373. Achiropsetta Norman, 1930. p. 361. Body fairly elongate, compressed and sinistral. Eyes large, close together and with the upper parts of each eyeball densely scaled. Lower eye a little in advance of the upper. Mouth of moderate size not reaching farther back than a point level with the posterior edge of the lower eye, maxillary narrow, not expanded behind. Jaws and teeth about equally developed on both sides. A small fleshy growth over the front tip of maxilla. Teeth small, conical and usually uniserial; vomer toothless. Few gill-rakers, those present being short. A NEW SPECIES OF FLATFISH, MANCOPSETTA MILFORDI 187 Dorsal fin starting far forward on head. All fin rays simple, scaled. Pelvic fin of eyed side may or may not be posteriorly deflected to the left. No true pectoral fins but a fin bud may be present in small specimens. Lateral line on both sides single, straight and well developed. Type species Lepidopsetia maculata Gunther, 1880. The genus contains four species: M. maculata (Gunther) 1880. M. tricholepis (Norman) 1930. M. slavae (Andriashev) 1960. M. milfordi sp. n. DIsTRIBUTION Andriashev (1955) has discussed the distribution of these fishes and has shown that they are known from a few specimens found over a wide area of the Southern ocean. The following are the only published locality records: M. maculata. This species is known from three specimens, all caught by bottom trawling in deep water — Marion Island: 46° 43’ S. 38° 5’ E. 580 m. (Gunther, 1880). Falkland Islands: 45° 45’ S. 59° 35’ W. 311-247 m. (Norman, 1937). South Georgia: 53° 48’ S. 35° 57’ W. 411-401 m. (Norman, 1938). M. tricholepis. This species is known from only two examples taken by bottom trawling in shallow water— Tierra del Fuego: 53° 00’ S. 68° 06’ W. 22-20 m. (Norman, 1930). Falkland Islands: (No details available) (Norman, 1937). M. slavae. Four specimens of this species are known and all were caught in midwater using an Isaacs-Kidd midwater trawl— Wilkes Land: 64° 51’ S. 114° 17’ E. 725 m. cable (Andriashev, 1960). (Antarctic) 63° 50’ S. 116° 25’ E. 1,100 m. cable (Andriashev, 1960). 64° 22’ S. 121° 08’ E. 1,100 m. cable (Andriashev, 1960). 64° 10’ S. 127° 46’ E. 1,100 m. cable (Andriashev, 1960). M. milfordi. Known from only two specimens both taken by bottom trawl in deep water — Cape of Good Hope, west of Cape Town. 550 m. Cape of Good Hope: 33° 40’ S. 17° 30’ E. 675 m. Some of these records are very widespread, especially M. maculata and suggest that these fishes are more common than the small number of known records would suggest. This is undoubtedly due to the very small amount of trawling that has been undertaken in the Southern ocean. More collecting would be very useful, as a good set of growth stages would certainly show whether M. slavae and M. maculata are in fact growth stages of the same species, and likewise with M. milfordi and M. tricholepis. 188 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Professor J. L. B. Smith of Grahamstown, Dr. A. P. Andriashev of Leningrad, and Mr. P. R. Sloan of La Jolla for help in obtaining literature; to the Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History) for the loan of valuable material for comparative purposes; to Messrs. Irvin and Johnson (Pty.) Ltd. for presenting these two interesting specimens to the South African Museum; and to Dr. F. H. Talbot and my wife, Mary-Louise Penrith, for reading the manuscript. The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the award of a grant to publish this paper. SUMMARY A new species of bothid, Mancopsetta milford: (Pisces: Bothidae), is described from deep water off the Cape of Good Hope. Four species of bothids are known which lack pectoral fins. They have been placed in two genera, Mancopsetta and Achiropsetta. It is shown that the two genera exhibit a marked overlap in characters and can be divided on only one character, which is probably a juvenile feature. The genus Mancopsetta is redefined to include all four species. REFERENCES ANDRIASHEV, A. P. 1960. Families of fishes new to the Antarctic. 3. Pelagic young of flatfish (Pisces, Bothidae) off the Antarctic coast. Zool. Zh. 39: 1056-1061. GiLL, T. 1881. Account of recent progress in Zoology. Rep. Smithson. Instu, 1880: 331-390. GUNTHER, A. 1880. Report on the shore fishes. Rep. Voy. Challenger 1873-6 1(6): 1-82. Kye, H. M. 1913. Flatfishes (Heterosomata). Rep. Danish oceanogr. Exp. medit. 1908-10 2 (At). Norman, J. R. 1930. Oceanic fishes and flatfishes collected in 1925-27. Discovery Rep. 2: 263-370. NNorMAN, J. R. 1934. A Systematic monograph of the flatfishes Heterosomata I. London, British Museum (Nat. Hist.). Norman, J. R. 1937. The coast fishes II. The Patagonian region. Discovery Rep. 16: 3-150. Norman, J. R. 1938. The coast fishes III. The Antarctic zone. Discovery Rep. 18: 3-104. Plate II Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII adA}0[0oH] Ipsofjiu vyjasqGoounyy INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE OF CONTENTS and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 43 in. x 7 in. (74 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmiTH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ‘ ad - M ‘ ie aa 4 a ? 1 i . °, ‘ ' \ . 4 ? ; A - ea ; k J 1 a j = < : ‘ r 1 Nee ae 4 — | eel MUS. COMP. zoo; FRANK HAMILTON TALBOT AND MARY-LOUISE PENRITEHY NOV 19 t¥oa HARVARD CTENOGOBIUS CLOATUS SMITH, 1666YERSITy A SYNONYM OF CTENOGOBIUS SALDANHA (BARNARD, 1927) September 1965 September Volume 48 Band Pare) 6. | Deel POT Tan ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad P< The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM ' word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1, Ns Sp 3 7-8), 3(1-2,.5, t--p-4.).) 5(2s (5 7-9), 6(1, t.—p.i.), 7(1; 3), 8, 9(1-2), 10(1-3), 1i(1-2, 7, t-p..), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3)s) aie Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel 20 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap CTENOGOBIUS CLOATUS SMITH, 1960, A SYNONYM OF CTENOGO- BIUS SALDANHA (BARNARD, 1927) © : By Frank Hamitton Tatsot and Mary-Loutsr Penrrrn~ ~* ~~: ZOOL. LIBRARY South African Museum, Cape Town | Ad \/ H f \ 4 ur NUV Lg 1900 (With 2 figures in the text and 1 plate) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ; . 189 Description of ee malta ; 190 Discussion . ; s : : 1QI Acknowledgements : : - 192 Summary . 4 , ; she gs References . : 3 : é 193 INTRODUCTION . New iadbckial in the South African Museum fish dibecons from Port Elizabeth, False Bay, and Saldanha Bay, has shown clearly that Ctenogobius ‘cloatus Smith, described from Knysna, and Clenogobius saldanha (Barnard), , described from Saldanha Bay, are synonymous. . The material examined is as follows: S:A.M. 23277: 1 specimen, 79 mm., tidal swimming pool, St. James, False Bay; S.A.M. 21488: 1 specimen, 33 mm., shallow water, Langebaan, Saldanha Bay; S.A.M. 21489: 1 specimen, 30 mm., shallow water, Langebaan, Saldanha Bay; S.A.M. 21490: 2 specimens, 34-37 mm., shallow water, Langebaan, Saldanha Bay; S.A.M. 22034: I specimen, 40, mm., inter-tidal eal Sea Point, Table aia, S.A.M. 17355: I specimen, 85 mm., Seldache Bay (type of saldanha Barnard) ; S.A.M. 23832: 6 specimens, 28-34 mm., dredged in 7 m. water, Saldanha Bay; S.A.M. 23831: 4 specimens, 51-61 mm., inter-tidal pools, Port Elizabeth; S.A.M. 24047: 4 specimens, 46 -5~54 mm., tidal swimming pool, Port Elizabeth; S.A.M. 24048: 3 specimens, 45-5-50 mm., inter-tidal pools, Port Elizabeth; S.A.M. 23979: 3 specimens, 53-79 mm., pedal pool, Strandfontein, False Bay; S.A.M. 24049: 2 specimens, 67 mm., 70 mm., inter-tidal pool, Strandfontein, False Bay; , Rhodes Univ.: 1 specimen, 85 mm., lagoon, Keven (type of cloatus Smith). 189 5 Ann. S. Afri. Mus. 48 (8), 1964, 189-193, 2 figs., 1 pl. a 1g0 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Ctenogobius saldanha (Barnard) (pl. IV, figs. 1, 2) Gobius saldanha Barnard, 1927, p. 823. Bathygobius saldanha (Barnard), Smith, 1949, p. 331. Monishia saldanha (Barnard), Smith, 1960, p. 304. Ctenogobius cloatus Smith, 1960, p. 302. Fin counts: D. VI + I 10-11; A. I 9-10; P. 19-23; C. 15 (branched rays only). Gill-rakers: 6—7 on lower arch, total 9. Scales 34-38, transverse 11. Depth 4:9-6°8. Head 3-0-3:6 in standard length. Teeth in jaw in several series; outer row markedly enlarged, inner rows viliform, no canines. Tongue truncate or feebly bilobed. Pectoral girdle without flaps, but with a low, indented ridge on the anterior border. Pectoral fin with upper 3-4 rays free, silk-like, markedly bifurcating (fig. 1). Pelvic fraenum (i.e. membrane connecting outer rays across base) strong and well developed (fig. 1). Eye 2-9-3-7 in head. Bony interorbital narrow, less than 5 in eye diameter, eyes adjacent. Pores and papillae of head shown in fig. 2. Ground colour whitish, with three very broad, irregular, faintly dusky cross-bars on body. Sides irregularly spotted with black. Underparts white. Nape dusky with a lighter transverse bar. Head whitish grey. A few small dark FIGURE I. Pectoral fin and pelvic fraenum of Ctenogobius saldanha (Barnard) from (a) Port Elizabeth; standard length 45.5 mm., (6) Saldanha Bay; standard length 35 mm., and (c) Knysna (type of cloatus Smith); standard length 85 mm. The fin is more contracted in (c) than in (a) and (6). CTENOGOBIUS CLOATUS SMITH Ig! spots on preopercle, and usually four in a straight line along hind margin of opercle. Pectoral base dusky with several dark spots. Dorsal fins dusky with rows of black dots forming bands. A large black spot on the membrane between the fourth and fifth and the fifth and sixth dorsal spines. Pectoral, pelvic, anal and caudal fins dusky. Head, nape, preopercle, and opercle naked; pectoral base, prepelvic, and belly with cycloid scales. FIGURE 2. Diagram of pores and papillae on head of Ctenogobius saldanha (Barnard). Discussion A re-examination of the type of saldanha shows certain errors in the original description. The outer row of teeth in each jaw is clearly enlarged (not villiform throughout) ; there are 11 series of scales between the first anal spine and the dorsal fin base, not 10 as stated in Barnard’s description; and the bases of the pectorals are scaled. Smith’s description of cloatus indicates the following differences from saldanha: strong development of the pelvic fraenum, absence of free upper pectoral rays in his specimens, enlargement of the outer row of teeth, number of transverse scale rows, shape of the tongue, and distribution. The pelvic fraenum of saldanha shows no differences from that of the type of cloatus (fig. 1). In both cases the fraenum is well developed. Smith’s type has ragged fins with many rays broken off, and the fin membranes are damaged. Nevertheless, this specimen has the upper pectoral 192 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM rays very similar. to those of saldanha (fig. 1) (both the type of saldanha and fresh specimens from the type locality). In addition, South African Museum speci- mens from Port Elizabeth have the upper rays similar to those of the type of saldanha. The apparent differences in teeth and in number of transverse scale rows fall away after re-examination of the type of saldanha. The tongue in both cloatus and in specimens of saldanha from the type locality is truncate or feebly bilobed. It is not adnate, and Barnard (1927) seems to have been correct in his suggestion that the apparently adnate tongue of the type was due to the fact that the specimen was preserved with the mouth unusually widely opened. Dehydration may also have played a part in this, and in the shrinkage of the tongue, which has obscured its shape. Bohlke & Robins (1960) have shown that the pore system of the head is important in the classification of gobies. This was found to be identical in all specimens examined, including Smith’s type specimen of Ctenogobius cloatus (fig. 2). As has been found in another intertidal group of fishes, the Clinidae, and in gobies such as Psammogobius knysnaensis Smith and Coryphopterus nudiceps (C. & V.), distribution around the Cape from at least as far west as Saldanha Bay to Algoa Bay or farther occurs commonly. We can find no difference between east and west coast specimens, and conclude that-cloatus and saldanha are synonymous. The well- -developed fraenum, presence of prepelvic scales, naked head and nape, scale and fin counts, narrow bony interorbital, enlarged outer teeth, tongue shape, and restricted gill openings, place this species within the genus Ctenogobius Gill, 1858, as defined by Koumans (1953). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS _ Acknowledgement is made to Professor J. L. B. Smith of the Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, for the loan of the type specimen of cloatus, and to Miss R. M. Tietz, of the Port Elizabeth Museum, and Mr. M. J. Penrith of the South African Museum, who assisted in the collection of fresh material. _ The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the award of a grant to publish this paper. SUMMARY It is shown that Ctenogobius cloatus Smith is synonymous with Ctenogobius saldanha (Barnard) (Pisces: Gobiidae). Ctenogobius saldanha is redescribed. {ha Ce, a a CTENOGOBIUS CLOATUS SMITH 193 REFERENCES BARNARD, K. H., 1927. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa Part II. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21: 419-1065. Bou.kE, J. E., & Rostns, C. R. 1960. A revision of the gobioid fish genus Coryphopterus. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 112: 103-128. Koumans, F. P. 1953. The fishes of the Indo-Australian archipelago. X. Gobioidea. Leiden: E. J. Brill. SmitTH, J. L. B. 1959. Gobioid fishes of the families Gobiidae, Periophthalmidae, Trypauchenidae, Taenioididae, and Kraemeriidae of the Western Indian Ocean. Ichthyol. Bull. 13: 185-225. Smitu, J. L. B. 1960. Fishes of the family Gobiidae in South Africa. Ichthyol. Bull. 18: 299-314. oe Pern ct ath tie Bsa @! i tty . ; \ + = fi . Mea ri ' i 4 hy 4 1 4) \ ‘ i eet Ny r + ’ i , - { 4 i) NE. VE eas i Py he vee ine at ae m3 b y? ‘et Aad i Th ate ND een Plate IV Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII *(paeuleg ) DYyUDpIVS sniqosouay’) INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLeE OF ConTENTS and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. x 7 in. (74 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-065. . London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). hy ib i oir oi tery Y PAA. Je a * Vane, ett , ih) Sa (it ne ; ! int ys Dra: vy i] | ae » ‘ ‘ 4.5 Aas U8 gE a aida ER il tice Herp Dean Poet ee he eee GOT nae kai . eon ; bei { mat é teh , ») 4 rie Fr i irh ie an TiN an a} a Vt Wi ihn don't ching With pete ‘ AEA stig } K. H. BARNARD ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY ©” THE GOUGH ISLAND SCIENTIFIC SURVEY September 1965 September Volume 48 Band Partcong . Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK By 200; ys 3 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t--p.i.), 5(2, 5» 7-9)» BG tapas 7(1; 3), 8 9(1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, t-p-i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4)- Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 35¢ Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY THE GOUGH ISLAND : SCIENTIFIC SURVEY By K. H. BaRnarpt South African Museum, Cape Town (With 3 figures in the text) LIBRARY CONTENTS VOV 19 i¥oD PAGE Prefatory note. : i + ros HARVARD Introduction ‘ : : - “1O5 BENTAVG. Isopoda ’ : : : iets) ai) Amphipoda . : : f “3 p20 Acknowledgements : : we 2OQ Summary . : : 3 2” 209 References . : ; : 209 PREFATORY NOTE The collection described in this paper was made by the Gough Island Scientific Survey, which worked on Gough Island from 13 November 1955 until 13 May 1956. Attention was largely concentrated on terrestrial biology, and consequently the marine amphipods and isopods described here were all obtained from a small number of collecting stations in the littoral and sub- littoral zones near the mouth of The Glen on the east coast of the island. No dredging was undertaken. The material was submitted to the author soon after the return of the Expedition, and this paper was written in 1957. At that time it was hoped that all the Expedition collections might be described in a comprehensive report, but the unequal progress of work on different taxonomic groups, some of which have yet to receive study, has made this impossible. Rather than delay publication still further it has been decided that all results should be presented as they stand, and the belated appearance of this paper is a direct consequence of this decision. Martin W. Holdgate INTRODUCTION The following collection of Isopoda and Amphipoda from the Gough Island Scientific Survey was entrusted to me by Dr. M. W. Holdgate, to whom I express my thanks for the opportunity of studying specimens from this remote and little known locality (Position: 40° 21’ S., 09° 55’ W.). The Collection is deposited in the British (Natural History), with reference specimens of most species in the South African Museum. + Dr. K. H. Barnard died on 22 September 1964. 195 Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 48 (9), 1965: 195-210, 3 figs. 3 196 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The Isopoda were more interesting than the Amphipoda as was to be expected for Stephensen (1949) had already studied the species of Amphipoda found at Tristan d’Acunha by the Norwegian Expedition. No species of amphipod was collected at Gough Island which was not already known from the sister isle; but not all the 32 (littoral and shallow-water) species recorded from the latter have been found at Gough Island. Much less is known about the Isopoda of these islands. Only three littoral or shallow-water marine species have been recorded from Tristan, two of them also from Gough Island. One introduced cosmopolitan woodlouse has been long known from Tristan, and one endemic species since the visit of H.M.S. Challenger. 'The Discovery II collected one of these marine species from Gough Island; the other two, also the two terrestrial woodlice, have been obtained by the present survey party. In addition six marine species new to the Tristan—Gough Island area were collected, two of which are described as new species. The rediscovery of the New Zealand Munna neozelanica is noteworthy. The isopodan and amphipodan fauna of these islands has relationships, in general, with South Africa, the Magellanic region, Australasia, and the sub- antarctic islands. Stephensen (1949) gave some zoogeographical remarks on the amphipods. An analysis for the isopods may be premature, but for what it is worth is as follows (excluding the two deep-water species collected by the Challenger) : Endemic on Tristan and/or Gough Island: 3 marine species (Paridotea apposita n. sp., Jaeropsis vibicaria n. sp., and Isocladus tristensis), 1 terrestrial (Stylo- niscus australis). Common to Gough Island and New Zealand: 1 marine species (Munna neo- zelandica). Common to Gough Island and St. Paul Island: 1 marine species ( Jaeropsis paulensis). Common to Tristan and/or Gough Island and South Africa and New Zealand: 2 marine species (Paridotea ungulata, Dynamenella huttont). Common to Tristan and/or Gough Island and other subantarctic regions: 1 marine species (Jais pubescens, commensal on Sphaeromids). Cosmopolitan, introduced: 1 terrestrial species (Porcellio scaber). Mention may be made of one maritime woodlouse whose absence (seem- ingly) on Tristan and Gough Island is rather remarkable, namely Deito. The species of this genus are known from South Africa, South America, Australia, New Zealand and its subantarctic islands, and St. Paul (southern Indian Ocean) (see Chilton, 1915: 437; and Barnard, 1932a: 220). They are large, conspicuous, and abundant. It is, therefore, a fair presumption that the genus does not occur on these islands. Dr. Sivertsen and Dr. Holthuis are at present studying the isopods collected on Tristan and neighbouring islands by the Norwegian Expedition. ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 197 Their results will give a much clearer picture of the fauna of the whole group than the analysis here given based on Gough Island alone. The preponderance of amphipods in the present collection may perhaps be due, at least in part, to methods of collecting. Kelp is a favourite haunt of these crustaceans, and numerous specimens can usually be obtained from only a few handfuls of weed. Isopods, however, often present a more difficult problem, varying with the type of beach, rock formation, tide range and other factors, not least Neptune’s co-operation in curbing the turbulence of the waves. ISOPODA Family Anthuridae Paranthura sp. A single juvenile specimen, 4°5 mm. in length, with only 6 peraeon segments and 6 pairs of legs. It has styliform mouth-parts, and the 5th joint of peraeopods 5 and 6 does not underride the 6th. It is therefore probably a species of Paranthura. The colour pattern may prove distinctive when more specimens can be obtained, possibly at Tristan if not at Gough Island. Pale yellowish, a dark patch on front of head, and a dark transverse band across pleon, faint speckling on the peraeon segments, eyes black. Locality: Dell Rocks (A 47. M 54). Family Sphaeromidae Isocladus tristensis (Leach) Exosphaeroma tristense (Leach) Tattersall, 1913: 882, pl., fig. 1 (juv. ¢ and 9). Tsocladus tristensis (Leach) Barnard, 1914: 384, pl. 33, fig. B (adult 3); 1955: 62 (transverse profile of body mentioned). Localities: Beach debris, Glen mouth; shore near Base; Dell Rocks; stomach of Soldier fish (A 27. M 1; A 47. M 60; B 5. M 83; B 10. M 88; and B 10. M go). A 27. M 1 a lot comprising adult and immature males, ovigerous females, and juveniles. Specimens of the commensal asellid Jats pubescens have been removed from some of them. A 27. M g (part) one very juvenile, probably this species. Previously recorded from Tristan and Gough Island. A re-examination of I. magellanensis Richardson, 1906, is necessary before it can be synonymised with tristensis. Dynamenaella huttoni (Thomson) Dynamenella huttoni (Thomson) Chilton, 1909: 657. Barnard, 1940: 419 (references). Dynamenella kraussi Barnard, 1914: 415, pl. 35, fig. B. These specimens agree with South African specimens in convexity of body, and absence of a raised rim on frontal margin of head. Although the surface is 198 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM glabrous (Barnard, 1914), it is not polished except in the mid-dorsal line of peraeon segments 2-6; on the head, lateral portions of peraeon, and on pleon and telson it is finely shagreened, and on the dorso-lateral portions of peraeon finely reticulated. | Colour (as preserved) corresponding with that of South African specimens (Barnard, 1914: 417): reddish, with or without a paler stripe (or series of spots) on each side, and indications of paler patches in middle of back. The size (male 7 mm., female with embryos 5 mm.) is considerably less than the average size of South African specimens. Localities : Dell Rocks and Seal Rocks (A 40. M 25; B 4. M 81; 1504). Family Idoteidae Paridotea ungulata (Pallas) Paridotea ungulata (Pallas) Hale, 1924: 221, fig. 9 e, f. 1929: 320, fig. 325 b (side view of 6th and 7th peraeon segments). Sheppard, 1957: 151, fig. 4 a-e. (Fig. 1 a) Tristan d’Acunha and Gough Island. Not taken by the present Survey. Paridotea apposita n. sp. (Fig. 1 5) The parallel-sided body gives this species the appearance of a large form of fucicola Barnard (1914: 327, pl. 36, fig. E). In other respects closely resemb- ling ungulata. Side-plates 5 and 6 postero-lateral angle quadrate, 7 a little produced, the angle slightly acute. Ficure 1. Paridotea. Side-plates 4-7 and apex of telson of: (a) ungulata (Pallas). (b) apposita n. sp. (c) munda Hale. Pleo-telson scarcely more than -one-third of the total length (ungulata: two-fifths), apex shallowly emarginate between the rounded postero-lateral angles, on which a faint keel is traceable. Sternal plates as in ungulata (see Barnard, 1914: pl. 36, fig. D, st. w.). ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 199 Maxilla 1 (of male 30 mm. long) outer plate with 12 spines, with a slender one between the two groups of 6, 4 of the inner group serrulate, but not the innermost shortest one, a seta in middle of plate below bases of spines; inner plate with 4 plumose setae and a simple seta. Maxilliped 7-jointed. Paraeopods as in ungulata; 3 stout serrulate spines on inner margin of 6th joint of peraeopod 1, one in each of peraeopods 2-7; 4th—6th joints of peraeo- pods 1-6, furry on inner margin in the large male, not furry in females or the smaller specimens. Uropod peduncle without median keel, a plumose seta at outer (when appendage is folded in) distal corner; length of ramus slightly less than basal width (2: 2-3), outer (when folded) margin more oblique (following the outline of telson) than in ungulata, the truncate distal margin relatively narrower. Pleopod 2 of male, stylet as in ungulata. Colour (as preserved): dull pinkish or reddish. Localities: Beach debris, Glen mouth; stomach of Soldier fish (A 27. M 2) I immature, 18 mm.; B 10. M 861 ¢ 30 mm., 2 immature Ig and 22 mm.; B 10. M 89 1 2 31 mm.; B 10. M g0 1 2 27 mm., I immature 18 mm. (head missing). The 31 mm. female shows the brood lamellae beginning to develop as tiny lobes, 0-5 mm. long, on segments 2—5; the 27 mm. female shows only slight pits in the positions where the lobes will appear at the next moult. Neither female shows any sign of the anterior peraeon segments broadening. Thanks to the kindness of Dr. H. M. Hale, then Director of the South Australian Museum, I was able to examine a specimen of P. munda Hale 1924, a species which merits comparison with ungulata and the Gough Island species. The accompanying figures (fig. 1) of the posterior side-plates and the telsonic apex will illustrate the differences in the three species. Hale’s figures of the side- plates (1924 and 1929) do not seem to show the correct shapes, in comparison with the specimen I have seen. This specimen also has a narrower notch at the telsonic apex. (fig. 1 c). The Cape species fucicola Barnard (not figured here) has a narrower telsonic notch than munda, side-plates 5 and 6 do not reach as far back as the hind margin of their segments, and the narrowly rounded apex of side-plate 7 extends only slightly beyond its segment. Family Jaeridae Iais pubescens (Dana) Tais pubescens (Dana) Chilton, 1909: 649. Barnard, 1914: 435, pl. 37, fig. C (typ. err. fig. of plp. 3 has been inverted and labelled ‘mxp’. See corrigendum 1916: 106). Nordenstam, 1933: 178, figs. 41 a—c (references). Menzies J. L., Barnard, 1951: 138, pls. 42, 43. Nordenstam (1933) stated that my figure (Barnard, 1914) of the mandible differed from that given by Stebbing (1900: pl. 38), apparently without noticing that the former was the male, notwithstanding that he himself 4 200 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM examined a male. He was also unaware of the corrigendum relating to the ‘mxp’ Paraeopod 1 triunguiculate (or as worded by Menzies & J. L. Barnard (1951), ‘biunguiculate, the inferior claw bifid’) as in the other peraeopods. Localities: Stream, at 150 ft. altitude, free-living; Beach debris, Glen mouth, on Isocladus; stomach of Soldier fish, on Isocladus (A 11. G. 64; A 27. M 1; B 10. M 88). The occurrence free-living in a stream at 150 ft. altitude is interesting. Chilton (1909: 650) found them free-living at the mouths of fresh water streams in the Sounds on the west coast of New Zealand, often out of range of ordinary high tides. But at 150 ft. altitude the Gough Island individuals would be probably far above even an occasional splash of salt water. Previously recorded as a commensal on the same Sphaeromid from Tristan. Note on South African specimens. Menzies & J. L. Barnard (1951: 148) have relegated the specimens recorded from the Cape and Durban to ‘species inquirendae’, and state that the former are ‘possibly not Jas’. This latter statement may perhaps have been due to the unfortunate typ. err. regarding the 3rd pleopod mentioned above. I have re-examined Cape material, and find that the 1st peraeopod is triunguiculate as in the other peraeopods, and therefore these specimens can be assigned to pubescens as diagnosed by the collaborating authors. The enlarge- ment of the mandibles in fully adult males, of which I have found two additional specimens, is also confirmed. Males with pleopods developed, and thus presumably functional, are much less common than females, and fully adult males with enlarged mandibles are rare. A single specimen from Durban was in poor condition, and consequently indecisive. Possibly specimens from Natal and from Inhambane, Portuguese East Africa (University of Cape Town Ecological Survey) and from Ceylon may prove referable to singaporensis Menzies & J. L. Barnard. Genus JAEROPSIS Koehler Only the austral species are here considered. According to the position and shape of the uropods two groups of species can be separated (fig. 2). In marionis, patagoniensis, intermedius and palliseri they are inserted only a short distance apart, project straight backwards, and their inner margins are straight (or nearly so) and fit closely together. In paulensis and curvicornis (of Stebbing) they are inserted well apart, fold obliquely inwards, and even when fully folded their apices do not touch one another. The shape of the telsonic apex is correlated: triangular and more or less acute in the first, rounded in the second group. Other taxonomic characters seem to be variously distributed. Chilton’s descriptions (1892a and 1912) of neozeylanicus are inadequate (see also Hurley, 1957: 19). + ~atte- a atiied a ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 201 Lateral margin 2nd anten- Uropod Maximilliped head telson na joints of apex of and joint First group : peduncle peduncle _ of palp -marionis serrate serrate linear hooked ste eh 1 patagoniensis smooth 1 tooth enlarged hooked linear intermedius serrate serrate enlarged hooked lobed (anteriorly) vibicaria smooth smooth enlarged rounded lobed palliseri smooth smooth enlarged rounded ? Second group curvicornis (Ceylon, smooth serrate enlarged hooked lobed S. Africa) paulensis (St. Paul) smooth smooth enlarged rounded ?lobed* paulensis (Gough Is.) smooth smooth enlarged rounded lobed * Vanh6ffen’s fig. 59 f/ shows a linear joint but the palp has been displaced, either in dissection or mounting, and consequently no reliance can be placed on the shape, as drawn, being the true shape. Jaeropsis paulensis Vanh. (Fig. 2 5) Jaeropsis paulensis Vanhoffen, 1914: 531, fig. 59 al. Anterior half of head grey, forming a transverse bar, posterior half and upper lip creamy-white, peraeon irrorated with grey, paler than the bar on head, pleo-telson faintly dusted with grey, appendages creamy-white, eyes black. Males 4—4°5 mm., ovigenous females 3—4°5 mm. Appears to agree very closely with paulensis from St. Paul Island (southern Indian Ocean). The discrepancy in the palp of the maxilliped is probably explainable as suggested in the footnote to the table above. The apex of the uropod is rather broadly rounded and has no hook, but the inner margin appears to be minutely serrulate. Localities: Dell Rocks; West Point Reef (A 40. M 33; A 47. M 60; B 1. M 69; 1541). a: b Cc Ficure 2. Jaeropsis. (a) vibicaria n. sp., pleo-telson, with uropod further enlarged. (b) paulensis Vanh. apex of telson, with uropod further enlarged. (c) ‘curvicornis’ (South Africa), apex of telson, with uropod further enlarged. 202 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Jaeropsis vibicaria n. sp. (Fig. 2 a) Although only a single specimen is present, a new species seems unavoid- able; its main taxonomic characters are given in the above table. Nordenstam (1933) had both sexes of patagoniensis and intermedius, consequently the smooth telsonic margin and lack of apical hook on the uropod cannot be attributed to sexual differences. Antenna @, left missing, right mutilated; 4th and 5th peduncular joints enlarged, with scarious outer edge which appears to be crenulate. Maxilliped, lobe of and joint of palp extending only one-third length of 3rd joint; 6 coupling hooks. Peraeopods and pleopods as for genus. Uropods inserted close together, directed backwards, their inner margins straight and approximate, apex rounded, with 2-3 setae (?plumose); both rami minute, especially the outer ramus, each with a tuft of setae. A dark grey triangular patch covering head except hind corners, con- tinued as a mid-dorsal somewhat moniliform stripe on peraeon, expanding into a subtriangular patch on pleo-telson, but not covering the anterior corners or the posterior third; rest of body, and appendages creamy-white, eyes black. 5°5 mm. Locality: Dell Rocks (A 47. M 60). One male. The colour pattern resembles that figured for patagoniensis Richardson (1909: 421, fig.). Jaeropsis curvicornis Stebb. ( ?non Nicolet) (Fig. 1 ¢) Jaeropsis curvicornis (?non Nicolet) Stebbing, 1905: 51, pl. xi, fig. C. Barnard, 1914: 224, pl. 20, fig GC: Since my description of one male from the Cape, I have seen more material: St. James (False Bay) and Sea Point (Cape Town) (coll. K.H.B.), Lambert’s Bay and Saldanha Bay (both on west coast) and Mossel Bay (coll. University of Cape ‘Town Ecological Survey). The lateral margin of head is smooth, that of pleo-telson serrate, both in juveniles and adults. The uropod has an apical hooked tooth,* and the inner distal margin serrulate; each ramus with a tuft of setae. A better figure than my 1914 one is given here. The colour resembles that of paulensis, and the dark crossbar on head offers a ready means of picking out this asellid from other species. Presumably Stebbing was able to compare his Ceylonese specimen with Nicolet’s description and figure; but it would be much more satisfactory to have a full description of specimens from the original Chilean locality. Until * Stebbing mistook this for the inner ramus; as also did Miss Richardson. (1909) in her description of patagoniensis. ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 203 that is available I feel some hesitation in identifying Cape poe with Nicolet’s curvicornis, but none in identifying them with the ‘curvicornis’ of Stebbing. Family Munnidae Munna neozelanica Chilton Munna neozelanica Chilton, 1892a: 267. 1892b: 2, pl. 1. figs. 1-8a, pl: 2, figs. 85-15, Monod, 1931: 14, figs. 8c, 9 c-e. Haliacris neozelanica (Chilton) Chilton, 1909: 650, fig. 14 a (prp. 1 3). 1912a: 132. Stephensen, 1927: 357: Largest male 4 mm., smallest, with hammer-shaped 1st peraeopod 2:5 mm.; ovig. females 2-5-2-75 mm. Peraeopod 1 of male, ‘hammer’ more strongly calcified than the other joints. The other peraeopods setose in male, especially 4th—6th joints of peraeopods 6 and 7. Chilton and Monod figured the 1st peraeopod of a juvenile male (Monod’s specimen 1-5 mm. in length), closely resembling that of the female figured by Chilton. Chilton figured three stages in the development of the ‘hammer’ (figs. 8b, 8c, 8d). giving the magnification of the figures but without stating the respective lengths of the specimens from which the appendages were removed. At what size, therefore, the change in shape occurs cannot be stated; in the present smallest male, 2-5 mm. in length, the peraeopod has already assumed its final shape, but of course is smaller than in the 4 mm. male. Chilton’s largest specimen was 3 mm. in length. No other Munnid has been described with the 1st peraeopod of the male shaped as in the New Zealand species, and the present specimens agree with the descriptions and figures of Chilton and Monod. Hitherto recorded only from New Zealand (south island) and the subantarctic Auckland and Campbell Islands. Localities: Dell Rocks and shore nearer Base (A 40. M 27; A 47. M 33; B5. M 84). Family Trichoniscidae Genus sTyLoniscus Dana Vandel, 1952: 14. Styloniscus australis (Dollfus) (Fig. 3) Trichoniscus (?) australis Dollfus, 1890: 6. Styloniscus (?) australis (Dollfus), Vandel, 1952: 17. Sparsely and minutely granulate, chiefly on posterior margins of head and ‘peraeon segments. Eye composed of 3 ocelli in a triangle, contiguous or almost so. ) Antenna 2, 5th joint with a basal and a subapical conical spine sometimes 204 , ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM a Ob d C e FiGurRE 3. Styloniscus australis (Dollfus). (a) distal joints of peraeopod 1. (6) distal joints of peraeopods 6 and 7. (¢) penial process. (d) pleopod 1 g. (e) pleopod 2 ¢. I or 2 smaller intermediate ones, and an apical spine on outer margin; flagellum 3-jointed, with apical tuft of setae, slightly shorter (excluding apical tuft) than 5th joint. Maxilla 1, outer plate with 9 spines, the inner ones simple, and 2 accessory setae scarcely extending beyond the longest spines and extremely finely setulose, outer margin entire, setose. Maxilliped, basal plate with convex outer margin, apically lobed, palp (outer plate) unjointed, inner plate composed of 1 joint with a small terminal joint, the latter much smaller than in magellanicus, cf. verrucosus Budde-Lund (1906: pl. 4, figs. 10, 11) and Vandel (1952, fig. 9). Peraeopod 1, 4th joint with one long and one short spine on outer margin, 4 spines on inner margin, the 3rd longest; 5th joint with 5 spines on inner margin, the 4th longest and apically trifid; 6th joint with 2 small spines on outer margin, one on inner margin. No sexual difference. Peraeopods 6 and 7, 5th joint with 5 or 6 spines on inner margin, the subapical one longest and apically trifid; 6th joint with 4 spines on inner margin, a series of about 15 close-set spines on outer margin. No sexual difference. ‘ Penial process with short, conical, wrinkled process in the apical emargi- nation. Pleopod 1 of male, outer corner of basal plate serrulate. Pleopod 2 of male, see fig. 3¢. Pleopod 5 of male, exopod grooved. 3°5-4 mm. X 1:3-2 mm. Mottled grey. Localities: Gough Island: various, from Beach debris, Glen mouth, to summit of Expedition Peak, alt. 2950 ft.; and Penguin Island (A 1. G 5 Ss G 13; A2. G 23; A 8. G 56 [A 9 on label]; A 12. G 194; S [stc? =A] G 88; A 14. G 80; A 27.G 149; A29.G 171; A 29. G 216; A 30. G 184; A 30. G 191; A 32. G 200; A 35. G 211; A 37. G 226; A 39. G 246; Agi. G 252; A 43. G; 268; B 3. G 305; B 3. G 315; B 8. G 338; B 13. G 373). ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 205 Tristan d’Acunha: Jenny’s Watrin. Vandel (1952: 99 and chart 76) said in regard to the geographical distribu- tion of Styloniscus: South Africa (southern coastal area), Madagascar, Mauritius, Patagonia, Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand and southern islands, Crozet Is., and ‘perhaps Tristan d’Acunha and Juan Fernandez’. Chilton’s ‘Marion Island’ (obiter dictum 1915: 454), is surely a laps. cal. for Crozets, which is _ correctly listed in his Subantarctic Islands New Zealand (1909: 799). The rediscovery of this species, first taken by H.M.S. Challenger on Tristan d’Acunha, is therefore welcome. : Family Porcellionidae Porcellio scaber Latr. Porcellio tristensis White, 1847: 99. Porcellio scaber Latr., Barnard, 1932a: 252, fig. 21 a-—c. Localities: Gough Island: various, from the Glen up to Michael’s Ridge, m@meeroooit. (A1.G5;A2.G13;A2.G23;A4.G30;A8.G53;A13. G 73; mise = — Al 13.G 68; A 14. G 80; A 16. G 84; A 16.G 93; Aa1.Gi117;A eit 110; A 24. G 127; A27.G 140; A 28. G 164; A 35. G a11; A 37. G 229; A 38. G 236; B 3. G 305; B11. G 350; B 13. G 365; B 13. G 373; B14. G 380; B 15/16. G 397). : Tristan d’Acunha: Jenny’s Watrin. Collected on Tristan by Capt. Dugald Carmichael (1816) and described as a new species by White (1847); later recorded from Tristan by Barnard (1932a). The Gough Island material comprises uniform slaty-grey and variously mottled specimens; some, e.g. from the Open Phylica forest by Lower Waters- meet (A 8. G 53) are very sparsely spotted with grey on a yellowish ground colour. AMPHIPODA Schellenberg, 1931; Barnard, 1932b:; Stephensen, 1949; Macnae, 1953. Family Lysianassidae Parawaldeckia kiddert (S. 1. Smith) Parawaldeckia kidderi (S. 1. Smith) Stephensen, 1927: 300, fig. 2. Schellenberg, 1931: 6 and 22 (contrasted with Socarnoides kergueleni). Stephensen 1949: 5. Stephensen (1927) gave figures of uropod 3 in the two sexes: in the male it carries a brush of long setae. Locality: Dell Rocks (B 2. M 75). Recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands (Nightingale and ‘Inaccessible). 206 _ ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Acontiostoma marionis Stebb. Acontiostoma marionis Stebbing, 1888: 709, pl. 30. Chilton, 1912b: 462. Barnard, 1932b: 32. Acontiostoma magellanicum Stebbing, 1888: 714, pl. 31. (= juv.) Gough Island, 100 fathoms (Chilton: Scotia). Family Stenothoidae Stenothoe sivertsent Steph. Stenothoe sivertsent Stephensen, 1949: 9, figs. 2, 3. Macnae, 1953: 1026. Locality: from Macrocystis kelp (M 25. Misc.). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Family Pontogeneiidae Pontogeneia tristanensis Brnrd. Pontogeneia tristanensis Barnard, 1932b: 199, figs. 118 m, 120. Stephensen, 1949: 15. Localities : Midshipman Rock, Dell Rocks, outer fringe kelp, kelp between Reef Point and Dell Rocks (A 42. M 34; A 44. M 34; A 44; B 1. M 65; BM. M 77; M. 25. Misc.). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Paramoera tristanensis Brnrd. Paramoera tristanensis Barnard, 1932b: 209, figs. 118 k, 127. Stephensen, 1949: 16. Macnae, 1953: 1026. Localities: Dell Rocks and Half-way Cave (A 40. M 26; A 47. M 42; B 4. M 80; B 5. M 82). Previously recorded from Gough Island, Tristan and neighbouring islands. Family Gammaridae Melita tristanensis n. sp. Melita gayi (non Nicolet) Stephensen, 1949: 22. Macnae, 1953: 1027. Agreeing with Stephensen’s Tristan material in having no medio-dorsal tooth on pleon segment 4, and thus disagreeing with the South African orgasmos Barnard, 1940. Stephensen said pleon segment 5 had ‘one pair of small subdorsal teeth’; the Gough Island specimens resemble orgasmos in having a pair of denticles with a seta between them on each side of the median line. I think one may assume that the two denticles in the Tristan specimens were actually double. . Side-plate 1 strongly expanded forwards as in orgasmos, but postero- inferior angle of pleon segment 3 quadrate with a small point (as in palmata). In view of these conflicting characters it is difficult to decide what specific name to attach to the Tristan-Gough Island specimens. Schellenberg (1931: 203) separated gay: Nicolet (incl. inaequistylis auct.) from the northern palmata mainly because of lack of material for comparison; he made no mention of such ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 207 critical characters as the dorsal dentation of the pleon, or the shape of the hind corner of pleon segment 3. In 1940 (p. 454) I revised my opinion as to the identity of ‘inaequistylis’ and its possible synonyms, and distinguished two species orgasmos Barnard and zeylanica Stebbing in the South African material previously recorded as inaequistylis. 1 consider it desirable to recognize distinct species in regions which have been separated for a considerable period, until material from each region has been thoroughly examined. Therefore, because no detailed description has yet been given of the South American gayi, I attach a new name to the Tristan-Gough Island specimens. A further question is: which characters are critical for defining the species ? Typically orgasmos has a dorsal tooth on pleon segment 4, but sometimes (Barnard, 1940: 455) this is absent! Colour (as preserved): purplish-brown, eyes black. Locality: Dell Rocks (A 40. M 26; A 47. M 60). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Family Talitridae Orchestia platensis Kroyer Orchestia platensis Kroyer, Stephensen, 1944: 57, figs. 15, 16. 1949: 25. Macnae 1953: 1027. Orchestia tristensis (Leach MS.) White, 1847: 86. Locality: Beach, opposite Hut (A 13. G ga). Previously recorded from Tristan and Inaccessible Island. Orchestia scutigerula (Dana) Orchestia scutigerula (Dana) Stephensen, 1949: 26, figs. 11, 12; Macnac, 1953: 1027. Localities: Penguin and Midshipman Islands (A 38. G 232; A 39. G 242; 390. G 247; A 42. G 261). Previously recorded from Nightingale and Inaccessible Islands. _ Hyale hirtipalma (Dana) Hyale hirtipalma (Dana), Stephensen, 1949: 30, fig. 13. Only one Male (in Bz. M 75) has the strongly setose flagellum of antenna 2 (cf. Barnard, 1916: 234); per contra the hand of case: 2 lacks the characteristic brush of setae. Localities: Beach debris, Glen mouth; Dell Rocks, Penguin Island, Half- way Cave, West Point Reef (A 27. M 11; A 28. M 18; A 28.M 19;B2.M 75; B 4. M 79; B 5. M 82; 1541; 1543). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring lone: 208 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Hyale grandicornis (Kroyer) Hyale grandicornis (Kroyer), Chilton, 1912b: 508. Stephensen, 1949: 33. figs. 14, 15. Macnae, 1953: 1028. Localities : Glen mouth and Dell Rocks (A 28. M 19; B1. M 72; B2. M 75). Previously recorded from the shore of Gough Island by Chilton (1912), and by Stephensen (1949) from Tristan and Nightingale Island. Allorchestes tristanensis Macnae Allorchestes tristanensis Macnae, 1953: 220. One immature female in the Discovery collection was assigned to this genus, and later collecting has confirmed its occurrence on Tristan. Stephensen (1949) regarded specimens as a variety of Hyale grandicornis, but Macnae (1953) has described them as a species of Allorchestes, commenting on the slight difference between the two genera. Family Aoridae Aora typica Kroyer Aora typica Kroyer, Stephensen, 1949: 41, fig. 18. Macnae, 1953: 1032. Locality: Dell Rocks (A 40. M 26; B 1. M 69). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Family Photidae Eurystheus remipes Brnrd. Eurystheus ?afer Stebbing, Chilton, 1g12b: 510, pl. 2, figs. 30-34. Eurystheus remipes Barnard, 1932b: 229, fig. 143. Gough Island, trawled in 100 fathoms (Chilton: Scotia). Falkland Islands, 105-115 metres (Barnard: Discovery). Family Ampithoidae Ampithoe brevipes (Dana) Ampithoe brevipes (Dana), Barnard, 1932b: 239, fig. 150. Stephensen, 1949: 44. Locality: Dell Rocks, from kelp (A 44. M 34; B 1. M 69). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Family Jassidae Ischyrocerus longimanus (Haswell) Ischyrocerus anguipes var. longimanus (Haswell), Barnard, 1932b: 243. Ischyrocerus longimanus (Haswell), Stephensen, 1949: 45 (references). Macnae, 1953: 1032. Locality: from kelp (M 25 Misc.; M 27). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. Stephensen (1949) considered that the true anguipes is confined to the northern hemisphere. 4 % 4 ISOPODA AND AMPHIPODA COLLECTED BY GOUGH ISLAND SURVEY 209 Family Caprellidae | Caprella acutifrons Latr. Caprella acutifrons Latr., Barnard, 1932b: 300. Macnae, 1953: 1032. Caprella acutifrons var. natalensis Mayer, Stephensen, 1949: 53. Localities: from kelp (A 44. M 35; A 44. M 36; A 44 outer fringe kelp; M 24. Misc.; M 26; M 27). Previously recorded from Tristan and neighbouring islands. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Trustees of the South African Museum acknowledge gratefully a grant from the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the publication of this paper. SUMMARY An account is given of the Isopoda and Amphipoda of Gough Island (40° 21’ S., 09° 55’ W.) based on the collections of the Gough Island Scientific Survey, 1955-1956. Eleven species of Isopoda and sixteen species of Amphipoda are recorded, including six marine species of Isopoda new to the Tristan— Gough area. Two new species of Isopoda, Paridotea apposita and Faeropsis vibicaria, and one new species of Amphipoda, Melita tristanensis, are described. REFERENCES BARNARD, K. H. 1914. Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 3. Additions to the marine Isopoda, with notes on some previously incompletely known species. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 10: 325a—358a, 359-442. BARNARD, K. H. 1916. Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 5. Amphipoda. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 15: 105-302. BarNARD, K. H. 1932a. Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. Terrestrial Isopoda. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 30: 179-388. BARNARD, K. H. 1932b. Amphipoda. Discovery Rep. 5: 1-326. BARNARD, K. H. 1940. Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 12. Further additions to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda, together with keys for the identifi- cation of the hitherto recorded marine and freshwater species. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 32: 381-543. BARNARD, K. H. 1955. Additions to the fauna-list of South African Crustacea and Pycnogonida. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 43: 1-107. BuppE-Lunp, G. 1906. Die Landisopoden der Deutschen Siidpolar-Expedition, 1901-1903. 9: 69-92. Cuitton, C. 1892a. Notes on some New Zealand Amphipoda and Isopoda. Trans. N. &. Inst. 24 (1891): 258-269. Cuitton, C. 1892b. A new species of Munna from New Zealand. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (6) g: 1-2. Cuitton, C. 1909. The Crustacea of the subantarctic islands of New Zealand. In PHILOso- PHICAL INSTITUTE OF CANTERBURY. The subantarctic islands of New Zealand, ed. by C. Chilton, &c. 2: 601-671. Wellington, N.Z.: Government Printer. Cuitton, C. 1912a. Miscellaneous notes on some New Zealand Crustacea. Trans. N.£. Inst. 44 (1911): 128-135. Cuitton, C. 1912b. The Amphipoda of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb. 48: 455-520. CuitTon, C. 1915. Deto, asubantarctic genus of terrestrial Isopoda. 7. Linn. Soc. ( Zool.) 32:435-456. 210 as ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Do.trus, A. 1890. Isopodes terrestres du ‘Challenger’. Bull. Soc. Etud. sci. Paris 12: 1-7. Hate, H. M. 1924. Notes on Australian Crustacea. No. 2. Trans. roy. Soc. S. Austr. 48: 2-6. Hate, H. M. 1929. The crustaceans of South Australia. 2: 201-380. Adelaide: Government Printer. Hour ey, D. E. 1957. Some Amphipoda, Isopoda, and Tanaidacea from Cook Strait. Zool. Publ. Vict. Univ. N.Z. 24: 1-20. Macnag, W. 1953. On a small collection of amphipods from Tristan da Cunha. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 122: 1025-1033. Menzigs, R. J. and BARNARD, J. L. 1951. The isopodan genus Jais. Bull. S. Calif. 50: 136-151. Monon, T. 1931. Tanaidacés et isopodes sub-antarctiques de la collection Kohl-Larsen du Senckenberg Museum. Senckenbergiana 13: 10-30. NorvDENsTAM, A. 1933. Marine Isopoda of the families Serolidae, Idotheidae, Pseudidotheidae, Arcturidae, Parasellidae and Stenetriidae, mainly from the South Atlantic. Further zool. Res. Swed. Antarct. exp. 3: 1-284. RicHARDSON, H. 1906. Descriptions of new isopod crustaceans of the family Sphaeromidae. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 31 (1907): 1-22. RicHarpson, H. 1909, Description of a new isopod of the genus Jaeropsis from Patagonia. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 36: 421, 422. ° SCHELLENBERG, A. 1931. Gammariden und Caprelliden des Magellan-gebietes, Siidgeorgiens und der Westantarktis. Further zool. Res. Swed. Antarct. Exp. 2 (6): 3-290. SHEPPARD, E. M. 1957. Isopod Crustacea. Part II. The sub-order Valvifera. Families: Idoteidae, Pseudidotheidae, and Xenarcturidae fam. n. Discovery Rep. 29: 141-198. Sressinc, T. R. R. 1888. Report on the Amphipoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Challenger Rep. 29. STEBBING, T. R. R. 1900. On some crustaceans from the Falkland Islands collected by Mr. Rupert Vallentin. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1900: 517-568. STEBBING, T. R. R. 1905. Report on the Isopoda collected by Professor Herdman at Ceylon in 1902. In HERDMAN, Ww. A. Report to the government of Ceylon on the pearl oyster fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar 4. (Suppl. Rep. 23): 1-64. London: Royal Society. STEPHENSEN, K. 1927. Crustacea from the Auckland and Campbell Islands. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh. 83: 289-390. STEPHENSEN, K. 1944. Some Japanese amphipods. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh. 108: 25-88. STEPHENSEN, K. 1949. The Amphipoda of Tristan da Cunha. Results Norweg. Exped. T. da Cunha 3 (19): 1-61. TATTERSALL, W. M. 1913. The Schizopoda, Stomatopoda, and Non-antarctic Isopoda of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb. 49: 865-894. ‘VANDEL, A. 1952. Les trichoniscides (crustacés, isopodes) de l’ hémisphére austral, leur place systématique, leur intérét biogéographique. Mém. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris (A) 6 (1): 1-116. VANHOFFEN, E. 1914. Die Isopoden der Deutschen Siidpolar-Expedition, 1901-1903. Disch. Stidpol.-Exped. 15: 449-598. Wurre, A. 1847. List of the specimens of Crustacea in the collection of the British Museum. London: British Museum. ~~. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE oF CONTENTS and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 43 in. x 7 in. (74 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Smit, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ‘ i re Lut Ne i o ys, ’ eet a NPR CH a { ) . o} ; ne an tA if } ee Te f 7 « | Ny c n ’ gi oa in uP ait) a ae CAP ARN ve UP us 1h ; Aid \ nh a f ; / ited iy iy Te | ' [gg ERAS MD es aud i > yay Y * % > a fi " @ « 4 4 (ne f fr we li us ~( a fe 1 h it i \} J ys i 3 4 j , ‘ . " a I ‘ (7) u ; { i) y 4 iv 1 r ' - ji Re pea i i ay , , r . 1 - ' 4 - Ve ; P x ' > f f tire = i P) . OS Tiel y ye oye % ul ; # ] 1 } i ' } ‘i iy vi : ey eA f Ve \ 4 4 J ars yf ol 44), Keck ah oa a 1? we : sy bo ref Se f nu POH Vane ead : ee | ay Harbeb VA hy 7 Payee ‘ Vine One evoke ae if ¥ Meer gy Goth WD eRe Vi Deg ee hak ahs (iJ way : iio — cali ; , oe 5 Seg 2 r ‘ ; i } Ge i j ” hy : ya \ re oe tee yh ; (a wut igure oe oe TE «Soh RN per es ae a wel we deat ws ta ag mer 4 Me : aah Mee ite b ye te 7, oa } WAY i ) ‘ \ f Noy ; i , a el ay A oe i iv i (ne iY ’ oN ; = ‘ae f a oa me) t - \.IaAex< i OWA . ~~ ~ead MARY-LOUISE PENRITH MUS. COMP ZOO! LIBRARY NOV 19 i965 HARVARD STUDIES ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE I. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF PAVOCLINUS, AND REDESCRIPTION OF GYNUTOCLINUS ROTUNDIFRONS (BARNARD) September 1965 September Volume 48 Band Part 10 1 £Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available _ Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(1, 3, 5, 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t-p.i-), 5(2, 5, 7-9), 6(1,) G-Pen) 7(1, 3), 8, . o{1-2), 10e(1—3); DOr 35 7s t=); 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4). Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 20C Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap STUDIES ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE. I. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF PAVOCLINUS, AND REDESCRIPTION OF GYNUTOCLINUS ROTUNDIFRONS (BARNARD) By US. COMP. ZOOL MUS. Ct Mary-Louise PENRITH LIBRARY South African Museum, Cape Town Si ee a Wa NQV £3 ty0e (With 4 figures in the text and 1 plate) HARVARD CONTENTS UNIVERSITY PAGE Introduction. : . : ‘ : ae Qin Description of Pavoclinus litorafontis n. sp. ; Pee ye Discussion : : ‘ : : ; 2. 2s Redescription of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Brnrd) . 215 Discussion , ; ; ; ; : 2. 216 Acknowledgements. F : : ; ey 2l7 Summary. : { ! : ‘ : Mee 6s, References : ‘ F ; ; ‘ PAROS My, INTRODUCTION During the course of a systematic and biological study of the South African fishes of the family Clinidae, extensive collecting has been carried out in the intertidal region of the south-western Cape coast. In May 1963 two specimens of a clinid which could not be identified with any of the species known at present were collected with hand-nets from the dense beds of the green alga Caulerpa filiformis at Strandfontein, in False Bay. Eleven more specimens were subsequently collected from the same area, and recently a single specimen was collected at Onrus River mouth, near Hermanus. The specimens were placed in the genus Pavoclinus Smith, 1945, on account of their lack of a supra-orbital tentacle, possession of a raised crest consisting of the first three dorsal spines, which is not separated from the rest of the fin by a notch in the membrane between the third and fourth dorsal spines, and their toothed vomer. While collecting was being carried out in kelp-filled pools at the bottom of the intertidal zone at Lambert’s Bay in January 1964, a male specimen of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard, 1937) was caught. This species was pre- viously known only from a single female specimen collected at Oudekraal in 1934 by the University of Cape Town. In March 1964 a juvenile specimen was collected from kelp in a gully at Lambert’s Bay. A redescription of the species is desirable, since the holotype was not fresh by the time it was received by Dr. Barnard and the colouring had therefore completely disappeared, the male was unknown, and there are a few errors in the original description. 211 S, Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (10), 1964: 211-217, 4 figs., 1 pl. a oT? ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Pavoclinus litorafontis n. sp. (Pl. V, figs. 1, 2) (litorafontis from Litus, -oris: beach; fons, -ntis: fountain) Material: (a) From Caulerpa beds in the intertidal zone, Strandfontein: S.A.M. 23876, 2 specimens, male and female, 91 mm., 110 mm.; S.A.M. 23877, 2 males, 102 mm., 175 mm.; S.A.M. 23952, 4 specimens, 1 male, 3 juveniles, 46-132 mm.; S.A.M. 23962, two juveniles, 41 mm., 43 mm.; S.A.M. 23972, one male, 136-5 mm.; S.A.M. 24052, one male, 164-5 mm. (holotype); (b) from an intertidal pool at Onrus River mouth, in Bifurcariopsis brassicaeformis ; S.A.M. 24081, one female, 64. mm. nS the Description: D. XXIX-XXXIII 6-8; A. II 20-23; P. 12; V. I 3; C. 19. Depth 4:5-5:75; Head 3:75-5 in standard length; eye 3°5-4:25 in head. Upper jaw (from angle of jaw to snout tip) 33°5-41°5% of head length (2-4-3 (a) Ventral view. (6) Lateral view. FicureE 1. Intromittent organ of Pavoclinus litorafontis. in head). Caudal peduncle length 58-5—75% of head length; caudal peduncle depth 22°5-33-5% of head length. First three spines of dorsal fin elevated to form a crest, decreasing in relative height with increase in size of fish. Not even a shallow notch in mem- brane between third and fourth spines. Upper pectoral rays short, pectoral fin roughly elongate-ovate. Inner pelvic ray stout, equal to others. Caudal peduncle long. Caudal fin subtruncate. Body somewhat elongate, compressed, covered with small imbricating scales. Snout bluntly conical. Eye rounded, protuberant, equal to snout. No supra-orbital tentacle. Nasal cirrus a small flap. Lips moderately thick. Lateral line of minute double and alternating single pores to the post- pectoral curve in the line, thereafter of minute, non-alternating single pores. Intromittent organ of male with a large, conical tip and a very short basal portion; a single pair of fleshy crescentic lips ensheathing the lower part of the tip (fig. 1). STUDIES ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE 213 Colour: Mainly green, with darker green, yellow, and iridescent silver longi- tudinal stripes. Usually a longitudinal silver or yellow stripe across the cheek and operculum. Fins green, dorsal and anal sometimes with translucent patches, always translucent patches in the caudal fin. Underparts green. The colouring is often much like that of the specimen figured in Smith (1949), No. 1001 (middle), as one of the colour variations of Pavoclinus heterodon (C. & V.), but the specimen is shown with a short caudal peduncle and a reduced inner (a) (5) (c) FicureE 2. Left pelvic fin of (a) Pavoclinus litorafontis, (6) Pavoclinus heterodon, (c) Pavoclinus pavo. pelvic ray. It is common for species of this genus to have silvery or pearly markings, often arranged longitudinally. Table 1. Fin counts and body proportions of the four species of Pavoclinus. litorafontis heterodon pavo profundus Dorsal spines .. a: os Fs 29-33 30-35 30-35 30 D. rays .. ¥ vi a5 Shy 6-8 4-6 2-4 4 mE TAYS: . me ai wh as 20-23 21-24 20-23 21 feadinS.L. .. Be ns we 375-5 3°5-4°75 3°5-4°75 3°9 Depth .. o mene AFG 3°25-5 3°75-5 4°75 Upper jaw (% ue head), : 33°5-41°5 30-36 22—36°5 36 Caudal peduncle length (% of bead)s: 58°5-75 26°5-38°5 40-465 36 Ist d. spine (% of std. L. oa fi ws Q-16°5 6°5-11 5°5-10°5 5-7 Eyein head... sha 2. 2°75-4.5 2°5-3°75 3-4 2°75 Discussion Only one specimen of Pavoclinus profundus was available for comparison, since this species is known only from the single specimen, taken in relatively deep water at Knysna (Smith, 1960). However, the specimen examined differs from P. litorafontis in a number of ways: P. profundus has a rather even dorsal fin, the first three spines not forming a crest; the inner pelvic ray is reduced; the caudal peduncle is short; there are fewer dorsal soft rays than in P. litora- fontis. 214 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM For a comparison of the fin counts and body proportions of the four species of Pavoclinus see table 1. Pavoclinus litorafontis differs from P. heterodon and P. pavo in that (i) the inner pelvic ray is not reduced, (ii) the caudal peduncle is very elongate, (iii). the dorsal soft rays are more numerous. Pavoclinus heterodon and P. pavo both have the inner pelvic ray reduced to — : half or less than half the length and thickness of the other two rays (fig. 2), while in P. litorafontis all the specimens had the inner pelvic ray as stout as the other two and equal to them in length. From table 1 it can be seen that the caudal peduncle of P. litorafontis is relatively considerably longer than that of P. heterodon or P. pavo. The caudal peduncle of P. heterodon is not elongate, the average caudal peduncle length for most of the South African Clinidae being about 25-35% of the head length. P. pavo has the caudal peduncle somewhat elongate, but in none of the specimens in the South African Museum collection did the caudal peduncle length approach that of P. litorafontis. P. pavo has 2—4 dorsal soft rays, P. heterodon 4-6, and P. litorafontis 6-8 (see table 1), thus both P. heterodon and P. litorafontis may have 6 dorsal soft rays. However, by far the majority of the specimens of P. heterodon examined had 5 dorsal soft rays, while only one of the specimens of P. litorafontis had 6, so that there is little overlap between the two species in this respect. P. litorafontis most closely resembles P. heterodon in that both are relatively large species with a bluntly conical snout, while P. favo is a small species with an acutely pointed snout. P. litorafontis is more elongate and compressed than P. heterodon, and has a higher dorsal crest. This is particularly noticeable in the juvenile specimens of 40-60 mm., which in P. litorafontis have a high crest (12— 16-5°% of standard length), while the crest is lower in juvenile P. heterodon (7°5-10% of standard length). The differences in caudal peduncle length and in the development of the inner pelvic ray between these two species are particularly striking, and the specimens can almost invariably be separated by the soft dorsal ray count as well. Male and female specimens of P. heterodon of a similar size to the specimens of P. litorafontis were collected from the Caulerpa beds at Strandfontein at the same time and were clearly different from them — in all the respects mentioned above, so that P. lztorafoniis cannot be regarded as a local or sexual variation or a geographical subspecies of P. heterodon. It is rather unusual to find an undiscovered species of intertidal fish in a well-known area. However, no intensive collecting of Clinidae has been done in this area for many years, and probably none at Strandfontein, and as this species is well camouflaged, evidently fairly rare, and possibly restricted with regard to distribution, it is perhaps not surprising that it has only now come to light. Strandfontein is an extremely interesting area zoologically; during the present study another clinid, Petraites brevicristatus, previously known from only ~ a few specimens, was found to occur in quite large numbers at Strandfontein, as well as the brotulid Bidenichthys capensis, also previously considered rare. STUDIES ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE 215 Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard, 1937) (Figs. 3, 4) Clinus rotundifrons Barnard, 1937: 63. Gynutoclinus rotundifrons Smith, 1945: 358. Material: S.A.M. 18587, one female, 83.5 mm., from kelp in an intertidal pool at Oudekraal, W. coast of Cape Peninsula (holotype) ; S.A.M. 24009, one male, 43°5 mm., from kelp, intertidal pool, Lambert’s Bay; S.A.M. 24082, one juvenile male, 26 mm., from kelp, intertidal gully, Lambert’s Bay. Description: D. XXX-XXXII 8; A. II 22-23; P. 12-14; V.1 3; C. 13. Depth 3°8, 3°95 in larger specimens, 5-2 in juvenile. Head 3.7-4:15 in standard length; eye 35-4 in head. Upper jaw 42°5-54:5% of head length. Caudal peduncle length 28-6-36-4°/, of head length ; caudal peduncle depth 28-6—32-2% of head length. Figure 3. Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard), g, 43°5 mm. (Drawn as in life from specimen contorted on preservation). First four dorsal spines slightly elevated, particularly in the two smaller specimens, to form a low, rounded crest, the second and third spines being the highest. Crest not separated from the rest of the fin by a notch in the membrane. Profile of dorsal fin undulating. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray reduced, not more than half of other two rays. Caudal peduncle short, about as broad as long. Caudal fin subtruncate. Body compressed, not elongate, more so in the juvenile specimen than in the larger ones; covered with minute cycloid scales, not imbricating. Head spherical, inflated, broad, with mucus pores opening on conspicuous papillae. Eye rounded, somewhat protuberant. A minute, simple papilla over the eye. Anterior nostril tubular, nasal cirrus large, deeply bilobed. Posterior nostril conspicuous, surrounded by short, skinny flaps. Mouth rather large. Vomer toothed. Lips very thin. Lateral line of single, non-alternating pores throughout, obsolete posteri- orly in the holotype, but distinct on the caudal peduncle in the smaller speci- mens. Intromittent organ of male with a long basal portion and a club-shaped 216 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM tip, ensheathed at the tip by a pair of thin, crescentic lateral lips and a minute pair of more or less confluent dorsal lips (fig. 4). Colour: (a) Male, 43-5 mm. Ground colour pale brown with about seven darker brown irregular cross-bars, edged with iridescent blue in fine broken lines. A very dark brown narrow vertical line behind and above the pectoral © axil, and another at the end of the caudal peduncle. Cross-bars of body con- tinued on to the dorsal fin, with translucent patches between them; translucent areas with fine black dots. Dorsal fin uniformly dark brown posteriorly; a (a) Ventral view. (6) Lateral view. FicureE 4. Intromittent organ of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons. single small translucent patch at the base near beginning of dorsal soft rays. Caudal fin translucent with very faint brown cross-bars, darkening at the margins. Pectoral fin translucent with four very fine dark brown cross-bars, the proximal one curved. Anal fin mainly dark brown, with two translucent patches near the base. Pelvic fins light brown with dark brown cross-bars. Head mainly light brown below. A dark brown stripe from the eye forwards in front of cheek to angle of jaw. Head above and opercular region deep pink. Snout pink. with a darker pink bar between the eyes and another above the © upper lip, a fine darker pink line down the middle. Eye silvery with golden- © brown radii. Chin and lips light brown mottled heavily with darker brown. — Branchiostegal membranes and jugular region silvery grey with fine black speckling. Belly silvery with a golden-brown sheen. Intromittent organ of male greyish, with fine black speckling. (b) Juvenile, 26 mm. Whole body and head yellow, without cross-bars or — markings, underparts lighter yellow. Dorsal fin with alternating pink and translucent patches. Anal fin yellow. Caudal and pectoral fins translucent. — Pelvic fins yellow with brown cross-bars. Discussion Neither Barnard (1937) nor Smith (1945) noticed the supra-orbital papilla. This is not surprising, as it is very small, and in the holotype had STUDIES ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE 217 shrunk owing to desiccation in the preservative; in life it is erect and quite distinct even to the naked eye. None of the other South African Clinidae described have a simple supra-orbital papilla; either there is a multifid supra- orbital tentacle, or a supra-orbital outgrowth is completely lacking. Gynutoclinus rotundifrons is apparently a weed-dwelling species, as all three specimens so far found were taken from amongst fronds of kelp. It is the only species which has not been recorded east of Cape Point, but if it is as rare as it appears to be, it is possibly more widely distributed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgement must be made to Dr. F. H. Talbot of the South African Museum for advice and help; to Professor J. L. B. Smith of the Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, for the loan of the unique specimen of Pavoclinus profundus; to my husband Mr. M. J. Penrith of the South African Museum, who collected most of the specimens studied, and to Mr. C. Berrisford for the Onrus River mouth specimen. The Trustees of the South African Museum acknowledge the award of a grant by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the publication of this paper. SUMMARY A new species of clinid, Pavoclinus litorafontis (Pisces: Clinidae), is described. Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard), previously known only from a unique specimen, is redescribed. REFERENCES Barnarp, K. H. 1937. Further notes on South African Marine Fishes. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 32 (2): 41-67. Smitru, J. L. B. 1945. The fishes of the family Clinidae in South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (11) 12: 535-546. Smiru, J. L. B. 1949. The sea fishes of Southern Africa. Central News Agency Ltd., South Africa. Smitn, J. L. B. 1960. A new species of South African clinid fish. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 3: 689-691. wilnt aa EY et AREA A Ok ad f ‘ i ¥ » ‘4 Pudi bf i wile yi hae ied Rats ECR wy Riu! vy . ; { \, Al ean) FS OLE! Fae Le ; : a ] ‘ Tee. # ) Pen E a f i i ye . , : BH ‘ ; , ; Harb { at i bi wa 4 1G ¥ i Ee eel i i Ve hi ayy ; Y ‘ : i | fe yal { ary | iW pee ede ea Aa ae { my a Ae t q ty uh i rs i ‘a Plate V Ann. S. Afr. Mus. Vol. XLVIII ‘(yyueg “ff ‘Ww :ydes80j,0yd) gs] qISsIA Jou ore seare poquoursidun oy} 23~7d sty) UI Ysnoyye “uy 9Y} JO YISUZT 9y1 NOYSno1y) snonuNuod si sXhe1 puv sourds [esiOp 9Y} Us9MJoq 9UBIqUIOU 9Y J, ‘ds -u sijuofps0j1) snuys0ang INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLeE oF ConTENTs and SumMARyY. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. x 7 in. (7$ in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Smitu, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). hy ay Lape to umn MUS. C SOMP. ZOOL LIBRARY NOV 19 i900 F. W. GESS CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF ‘THE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS CERAMIUS LATREILLE (HYMENOPTERA: MASARIDAE) September 1965 September Volume 48 ~~ Band Part. “41 Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(0, 3 3 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t—p.i.), 5(2; 5; 7-9); 6(1, t.—p.1.), 7(1; 3), 8, g(1-2), 10(1-3), ri(1-2, 9 t-p.l.),. 21," 24), °91(i=3), aati Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 35¢ Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape | Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS CERAMIUS LATREILLE (HYMENOPTERA: MASARIDAE) By MUS OMP ZOOL, F. W. GEss ; Nid j (GOO South African Museum, Cape Town OARVARL ( With 1 map) UNIVERS! CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . . 219 Descriptions of oa oat Be pahiion ecieds: . 219 Discussion of the Distribution of the Genus Ceramius . 228 Summary i ; : ; ’ ‘ : . 230 Acknowledgements . : : é : : Hy Rgr References A ; : F : ; ‘ HST INTRODUCTION While arranging the Masaridae in the collection of the South African Museum according to the recent revision of the family by Richards (1962), it was found that this material, which was unfortunately not seen by Richards, supplemented his account in several i oca especially in the genus Ceramius Latreille. In the present paper, dealing with the above genus, the hitherto unknown @ of clypeatus Richards and ¢ of metanotalis Richards are described; the ¢ assigned by Richards to peringueyi Brauns is removed from that species and together with a matching 9 is described as a new species, richardsi, and lastly, rex de Saussure is resurrected. The locality records of all the specimens in the collection are given in the hope that these may aid in presenting a more complete picture of the distribution of the various South African species. Finally the distribution of the genus as a whole is discussed in the light of the biology of these wasps. The sequence of species followed is nearly the same as that adopted by Richards, and this paper closely follows the presentation set by the latter in his revision. South African Museum is here abbreviated to S.A.M. DESCRIPTIONS OF SPECIES AND DISTRIBUTION RECORDS Ceramius cerceriformis de Saussure Ceramius cerceriformis de Saussure, 1853: xxi, §; Richards, 1962: 97, 3; 9. Ceramius (Ceramioides) cerceriformis de Saussure, 1854: pl. 4, nee 1, 0; 1855: 72, 3. Cerceris vespiformis de Saussure, 1855: 79, @. 219 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (11), 1965: 219-231, I map. 220 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM No specimens were found in the South African Museum collection that could be assigned to this species. Ceramius schulthessi Brauns Ceramius schulthessi Brauns, 1902: 182, 2; Brauns, 1913: 196, pl. 2, fig. 6, g, 2; Richards, 1962: gg. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Willowmore, no date, 399 (one marked as co-type), I. xii. 1904, 9, xi. 1917, 2 99 (Dr. Brauns) ; Augusfontein, Calvinia, ix. 1947, 3 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Oudtshoorn, Zebra, x. 1951, 3 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Touws River—Hondewater (18 miles E. of Touws River), xii. 1962, 2 (S.A.M. Staff); Bloutoring Station (30 miles E. of Touws River), xii. 1962, 4 9° (S.A.M. Staff). Namaqualand: Between Kamieskroon and Springbok, x. 1939, 4 go 4 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Wallekraal, x. 1950, 2 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius peringueyi Brauns Ceramius peringueyi Brauns, 1913: 194, 2; Richards, 1962: 100 [9 only]. [non] Ceramius peringueyi Brauns, Richards, 1962: 100, ¢ [ = richardsi sp. n.]}. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Stellenbosch, x. 1888, holotype 2 (L. Peringuey) (Transvaal Museum) ; Het Kruis, x. 1947, 3 99 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Paleisheuwel, xi. 1948, 9 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius clypeatus Richards Ceramius clypeatus Richards, 1962: 99, ¢. Q. Black; raised disk of clypeus to a variable degree, inner orbits at deepest portions of ocular sinus, spot of variable size on tempora, usually a small spot on prepectus, variably sized spot at apex of scutellum, rarely a minute spot on propodeal spine, occasionally a short basal streak along outer side of fore tibiae and rarely indicated basal spots on outer side of mid and hind tibiae, spots at sides of gastral tergites 1-4 and usually also on 5, sometimes produced inwards on 2-5 either forming narrow continuous or interrupted bands, creamy-white to yellowish. Underside of antennal joints 4-12 though sometimes fewer, legs except coxae, trochanters and base of femora, orange. Wings light fuscous, veins brown. Length 14-16 mm., length of fore wing 10°5—11°5 mm., hamuli 18-24. Altogether very similar indeed to the male, the peculiarly modified clypeus, for example, except in its greater width in the female, being virtually identical in the two sexes. The chief secondary sexual structural differences are the following: eyes somewhat smaller, further apart, interocular distance at level of sockets twice length of scape (without radicle); antennal scape less curved and less robust, segment 3 shorter, only half as long as scape (without radicle), 4-10 progressively wider, 10 about 14 times as wide as long, 11-12 a little narrower; fore trochanter simple. CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF CERAMIUS LATREILLE 221 From the specimens examined it appears that in both sexes the longer spur of the hind tibia is not originally simple but may become so by the loss or wearing away of the fine spines situated near the tip of the spur. While the trifid condition is common, there is a specimen with a 4-spined spur and others with all graduations to the simple condition. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Clanwilliam, Nardouw, ix. 1941, II gd, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Het Kruis, x. 1947, 7 3d (S.A.M. Staff) ; Citrusdal Dist., xi. 1948, 5 92 (S.A.M. Staff); 4 miles S. of Clanwilliam, ix. 1961, 2 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius richardsi sp. n. Ceramius peringucyt (non Brauns) Richards, 1962: 100 [partim, $ only]. The ¢ of this new species, which has been adequately described by Richards, was unfortunately assigned by him to peringueyi Brauns to which species it most certainly does not belong. This misidentification was made obvious by the discovery in the collection of the South African Museum of a hitherto undescribed 9 which closely matches Richards’ ¢ in all important characters such as the unusual form of the clypeus. That this latter character is of value in associating the sexes is demonstrated by the discovery, also in the South African Museum collection, of the hitherto undescribed @ of clypeatus Richards, a closely related species, the ¢ of which was used by Richards as a comparison in describing what he thought was the ¢ of peringuey: Brauns. In clypeatus Richards the form of the clypeus is common to both sexes. I have pleasure in naming the ¢ under consideration and the here described matching Q after the author, Professor Richards. The true 3 of peringueyi Brauns is thus still unknown. 2. Black; spot on mandibles near base, large discal spot on clypeus, inner orbits to top of ocular sinus, streak at top of tempora, two widely separated streaks on hind margin of pronotum, dot at apex of scutellum, moderately large spot on prepectus, small anterior spots at base of fore tibiae and end of mid femora, narrow lateral spots on gastral tergites 1-5 (tergite 6 hidden) produced inwards and forming narrow incomplete bands on tergites 2-3 and centrally widened ones on 4-5, creamy-white. Antennal segments 4-12 beneath, portions of mandibles, anterior vertical portion of clypeus beneath disk, whole of legs except coxae of all legs and _ trochanters and bases of femora on mid and hind legs, reddish. Wings fuscous, venation dark brown. Length 15 mm., length of fore wing 10 mm., hamuli 21. Head, thorax and gaster with long, rather dense, whitish hairs. Mandibles strongly striate distally, ending in two large blunt teeth with a smaller more dorsal one. Clypeus elongate, strongly raised, anteriorly falling at right angles towards ventral margin; length of vertical part 3 length of disk; from just below point of inflection two small curved teeth project upwards; ventral 1 222 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM margin produced, somewhat lamellate, truncate and slightly emarginate; disk narrower at apex than at base; anterior-lateral margins raised and slightly lamellate. Antennal sockets separated by 34 times their diameter; interocular distance at level of sockets twice the length of scape (without radicle) ; total length of scape 34 times greatest width (at apex); segment 2 very short, 3 slightly shorter than 4-+5+6, 4-12 all of about same length, 4-10 becoming gradually and progressively wider, 11 slightly narrower than 10, 12 narrower still, rounded at apex. Disk of clypeus and small, roughly triangular area above it and between antennal sockets almost smooth; frons punctured; posterior ocelli a little in front of hind margin of eyes; distance between eye and posterior ocellus: distance between posterior ocelli = 10 : 7; occiput behind eye some- what wider than interocellar distance; occipital keel present. Thorax with fairly coarse, separated punctures, the interstices shining, about as wide or wider than the punctures. Mesoscutum shining; prescutal furrows deep over their entire length, especially so behind. Raised disk of scutellum with rounded edges and without a central keel. Metanotum with a central prominence, lateral depressions fairly deep but open. Tegula smooth and shining, only the base punctured. Propodeum with fairly long blunt spines; posterior surface almost flat; spiracle with anterior margin strongly produced backwards. Fore tibial spur regularly curved, tip somewhat recurved. Mid and hind tibiae with two spurs, longer spur of hind tibia simple. Inner keel of hind coxa present on proximal half only. Claws simple. Gaster shining; tergite 1 constricted posteriorly, more finely punctured than thorax; tergites 2-6 becoming progressively finer punctured, 2 somewhat contracted at base. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Clanwilliam, ix. 1928 (Dr. Brauns), Holotype g (Transvaal Museum, Pretoria); Paleisheuwel, xi. 1948 (S.A.M. Staff), Allotype 9 (S.A.M.). The female has ten mites present on the axillae and lateral depressions of the metanotum. Ceramius nigripennis de Saussure Ceramius (Paraceramius) nigripennis de Saussure, 1854: pl. 3, fig. 4, 9; 1855: 60. Ceramius nigripennis de Saussure, Richards, 1962: 100. Ceramius hesset Turner, 1935: 296, 3, 2. [non] Ceramuis nigripennis of other authors. Specimens examined: Namaqualand: Kamieskroon, ix. 1930, ¢ holotype, allotype of C. hessei Turner, 24 99 (S.A.M. Staff) ; between Kamieskroon and Springbok, x. 1939, ¢, 2 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Bowesdorp, xi. 1931, 3, 1x. 1941, 2 gd (S.A.M. Staff); Outiep, Garies, ix. 1953, 5 (J. du Toit). Ceramius toriger von Schulthess Ceramius toriger von Schulthess, 1935: 383, 2; Richards, 1962: 101. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Augusfontein, Calvinia, ix. 1947, 19 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Tankwa Karoo, Waterval, xi. 1952, 10 99 (S.A.M. Staff) ; 5 miles N. of Nieuwoudtville, ix. 1961, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff). oe ee ; CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF CERAMIUS LATREILLE 223 A single female from Namaqualand: Knersvlakte, x. 1950 (S.A.M. Staff), differs from the description of this species and from the above listed specimens in that the light coloured markings are more extensive and are yellow, not ivory. Structurally there are no differences. The distribution of the yellow markings is given below. | Black; large spots on basal half of mandibles, clypeus (except for oblique black streaks arising from bottom of antennal sockets, infuscation between ends of these streaks and lateral margins, and ferruginous lateral and apical margins), a large pentagonal spot enclosing a black triangle on frons above clypeus, inner orbits to centre of ocular sinus, spots behind eyes, uninterrupted pronotal band extending onto sides, large spots on mesopleura, sides of mesonotum next to tegulae, a small median spot in posterior region of mesoscutum, posterior quarter of scutellum and centre of metathorax, streaks on axillae, whole of propodeum behind level of spiracles, broad apical bands widened laterally on tergites 1-5, tergite 6 except for depressed area, whole of sternite 2, wide apical bands on sternites 3 and 4, portions of femora and tibiae, yellow. In addition, the antennae are much lighter in colour, the scape being largely yellow. Ceramius braunsi Turner Ceramius braunsi Turner, 1935: 294, 5, 9; Richards, 1962: ror. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Olifants River, between Citrusdal and Clanwilliam, x—xi. 1931, ¢ holotype, 2 allotype, 3 gd, 32 9? (S.A.M. Staff); Pakhuis Pass, Clanwilliam, ix. 1942, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); 4 miles S. of Clanwilliam, ix. 1961, 2 gg, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius jacoti Richards Ceramius jacoti Richards, 1962: 101, d, @. Ceramius nigripennis (non de Saussure) Brauns, 1913: 201, pl. 2, fig. 3, 3. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Hex River, i. 1884, 2; Oudtshoorn, Zebra, x. 1951, 17 92 (S.A.M. Staff); Ouberg Pass, S.E. of Touws River, xi. 1962, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); Verkeerde Vlei, Touws River—Hottentots Kloof, xii. 1962, 11 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Constable, xii. 1962, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); Touws River—Ouberg Pass, xii. 1962, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); 8 miles N.E. of Touws River, xii. 1962, 2 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Bloutoring Station, 30 miles E. of Touws River, xii. 1962, 98 99 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius beyert Brauns Ceramius beyeri Brauns, 1903: 69, do, 9; Richards, 1962: 102, figs. 105-9. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Willowmore, no date, 9 cotype, 2 99 (Dr. Brauns) ; Somerset East, 25-30. xi. 1930, 3, (R.E. Turner) ; Nieuveld 224 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Escarpment, Rietvlei, 1. 1949, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); Tankwa Karroo, Renoster River, xi. 1952, 116 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Constable, xii. 1962, 3 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Matroosberg Station, xii. 1962, 9 (S.A.M. Staff); Touws River— Hondewater (18 miles E. of Touws River), xii. 1962, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Bloutoring Station, 30 miles E. of Touws River, xii. 1962, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius damarinus Turner Ceramius damarinus Turner, 1935: 293, 3, 9; Richards, 1962: 102. Specimens examined: S.W. Africa: Ongandjera, ili. 1923, type g, 2 gd cotypes, 3, type 9 (S.A.M. Staff); Kamanyab, iii. 1925, 2 gg (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius lichtensteini (Klug) Gnatho lichtensteinii Klug, 1810: 36, 38, pl. 1, fig. 3, e and f. Ceramius lichtensteinii (Klug), Klug, 1824: 225; de Saussure, 1855: 73, 2; Brauns, 1913: 193; Bequaert, 1928: 145; Richards, 1962: 102. Ceramius macrocephalus de Saussure, 1854: pl. 3, fig. 2, 2; Brauns, 1903: 65, 68, g, Q. Ceramius rufomaculatus Cameron, 1906: 325, 9. [non] ?Ceramius rex de Saussure, Richards, 1962: 102. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Willowmore, 15. xl. 1899, dg, 10. 1. 1900, 2 (Dr. H. Brauns); Dunbrody, 1go00, g, 2 (Rev. O’Neil), 1901, 9 (J. A. O’Neil) ; Uitenhage, Dunbrody, no date, 9 (Rev. O’ Neil); Pearston, 1905, 2 99 (Dr. Broom) ; Aberdeen, xi. 1935, 2 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Tankwa Karroo, Waterval, X1. 1952, 21 9g, 9 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Bloutoring Station, 30 miles E. of Touws River, xii. 1962, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff). South West Africa: Damaraland, 1890, 2 (R. Lightfoot). It is very doubt- ful whether this last record is correct. Ceramius caffer de Saussure Ceramuus caffer de Saussure, 1855: 76, 2; Richards, 1962: 104, figs. 110-113, 115, d; Q. Ceramius consobrinus de Saussure, 1855: 77, 2; Brauns, 1913: 198, 3, 2. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Stellenbosch, x. 1888, 3 gg, 2 29, no date, 9 (L. Peringuey), 1908, 26 99 (C. P. Lounsbury). All the specimens carry mites in the acarinarium. Ceramius metanotalis Richards Ceramius metanotalis Richards, 1962: 106, fig. 114, 9. ¢. Black; whole disk of mandibles, labrum, clypeus except very narrow margins, roughly rectangular area above and between antennal sockets (separated from clypeus by a narrow black line at suture and produced slightly upwards at inner margins of antennal sockets and with a small black tubercle at centre), narrow orbits up to centre of eye emargination, small occipital spots behind upper portion of eyes, underside of antennal scape, underside of 2nd ———— $4 4 oH ee bo 6 ee Se eee ee Ae CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF CERAMIUS LATREILLE 225 segment and basal two thirds of 3rd segment, pronotal band (narrowly inter- rupted at centre and produced on to humerus and to tegula), a minute spot on postero-lateral corner of mesoscutum and inner corner of axilla, sometimes a small spot at tip of scutellum, sometimes a very narrow streak on lower part of axilla, a spot at angles of propodeum, a single dorsal spot on mesopleuron, legs (except dorsal portions of coxae and trochanters, hind surface of middle and hind femora and tips of tarsal segments 3, 4 and 5 of above legs), inner margin of tegula, distal part of humeral plate, large spot on each side of first gastral tergite (not or only narrowly joined at hind margin), bands on tergites 2-5 (strongly widened at sides and plano-convex medially at hind margins), _ posterior portion of tergite 6 and small spot at sides of tergite 7, almost all of sternites 2—5 and sides of sternites 6 and sometimes 7, pale yellow. Antennal flagellum except some black dorsal suffusion on all segments bar the last, ferruginous. Wings faintly brownish, veins brown. Length 17, 18, 19 mm., length of fore wing 12, 13, 13 mm., hamuli (20, 21), 22 (20, 22). The chief secondary sexual structural differences are the following: Sides of clypeus more converging ventrally; margin narrower and very slightly concave. Eyes larger, a lot closer together; interocular distance at level of sockets = 1-5 times length of scape (without radicle) (2-2 in 2). Antennal scape strongly widened, curved as in 9; segment 3 flattened in side view, narrow except at apex, a little shorter than scape (without radicle) and slightly longer than 4+5+6; 4-11 becoming progressively wider; 12 forming a powerful, long, flattened and fairly wide hook, curved at base and at apex; inner surface of hook with a low, off-central, longitudinal carina on distal half; 8-10 with a shining, slightly raised transverse swelling beneath; entire underside of 11 swollen and shining. Fore trochanter with a very large, crescentic lobe, curving outwards, outer edge transparent, somewhat sinuate. Segment 1 of mid tarsus longer, curved; 2-5 strikingly laterally compressed, wide in side view; 3 and 4 almost oval in outline. Gaster with tergite 7 elongate, apically with a wide, shallow, angular emargination; sternite 3 with disk transversely swollen, raised on each side into a mound ending in a blunt tubercle, without raised preapical lateral keels; sternite 4 unmodified in structure; disks of both sternites 3 and 4 covered with dense white pubescence; sternites 7 and 8 very similar to those of caffer de Saussure; prominence on 7 more pronounced. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Bulhoek, Klaver—Clanwilliam, X. 1950, 3 gd, 27 29 (S.A.M. Staff). Six of the 27 females have mites in the acarinium. The three males are free of mites, however. Ceramius rex de Saussure Ceramius rex de Saussure, 1855: 75, 9; Turner, 1935: 290. Ceramius lichtensteinii (non Klug), Richards, 1962: 102. A single female specimen from Namaqualand: Klipvlei, Garies, XI. 1931 (S.A.M. Staff), believed to be this species, bears the label ‘Ceramius rex Sauss. 9, 226 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM det. Turner’. Concerning this specimen, Turner (1935: 290-1) correctly stated that it corresponds to the description of rex de Saussure, but measures only 19 mm., not 24. His further statement that it is allied to lichtensteinii (Klug) is incorrect for the specimen is entirely different from the latter species, being allied to caffer de Saussure and metanotalis Richards, though distinct from both of these. Richards (1962: 102) treated rex de Saussure as a doubtful synonym of lichtensteinit (Klug) but did not see the specimen now under consideration which appears to be the true rex de Saussure. The following is a description of this specimen. Q. Black; clypeus, a large, broad pentagonal spot between the antennae and above the clypeus (from which it is separated by a narrow black line at suture), a narrow streak on inner margins of eyes below, streak in ocular sinus, spot on mandibles near base, underside of scape, spots behind eyes (joined along occipital margin), pronotal band produced onto humerus and to tegula (leaving a triangular black area on side), spot at postero-lateral corner of mesoscutum, inner corner and streak on lower part of axilla, posterior part of scutellar disk and flap of posttegula, central area of metanotum and portion below acarinarium, whole of propodeum (except for black region anterior to spiracles on sides, black lateral streaks on posterior surface near junction with metanotum and two black marks just above oriface), a large spot on meso- pleuron, spots on anterior surface of coxae 2 and 3, portions of trochanters, greater part of femora and tibiae of all legs, inner margin of tegula, wide posterior bands widening on sides on gastral tergites 1-5, almost whole disk of 6, two small streaks on posterior area of sternite 1, whole of sternites 2-5 except extreme base of 2, pale yellow. Anterior margin of clypeus, distal half of mandibles, antennal flagellum (except some black dorsal suffusion), some suffusion on tibiae and entire tarsi, suffusion on gastral sternite 6, ferruginous. Wings faintly brownish, veins brown. Length 19 mm., length of fore wing 13:8 mm., hamuli 23. Head, thorax and base of first gastral segment with long whitish hairs, densest on head, dense on pleura, sides and angles of propodeum;; rest of gaster with very fine tomentum-like pubescence. Clypeus one third longer than wide at ventral margin, moderately coarsely punctured; ventral margin truncate, sharply angled, with a fairly wide, smooth border. Antennal sockets separated by 4:1 times their diameter; interocular distance at level of sockets twice the length of scape (without radicle) ; scape (without radicle) almost 3 times as long as greatest width; segment 2 very short, broader than long; 3 half as long as scape (without radicle), twice as long as greatest width, of same length as 4-++-5-+6; 4-10 progressively wider; 10 about twice as wide as long; 11 and 12 a little narrower. Frons dull, finely punctured; POL : OOL = 1 : 1-7; posterior ocelli about half ocellar diameter in front of hind margin of eyes; occipital keel absent. Pronotum with spiracular lobe well defined by a furrow; lateral furrow partially obscured by legs, apparently rather weak; anterior margin apparently not markedly keel-like; dorsal surface CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF CERAMIUS LATREILLE 227 finely and closely punctured. Mesoscutum dull, finely, confluently punctured; prescutal furrows well marked over their entire length, especially behind; parapsidal furrows fairly weak; median notal suture marked anteriorly by a smooth, shining, unpunctured line, posteriorly marked by a furrow. Suture between axilla and scutellum with a pit ventrally. Raised disk of scutellum convex, in profile smoothly arcuate to posterior margin, with a well marked, raised, median keel and moderate lateral keels posteriorly, dull, punctured like mesoscutum; lateral declivities more shining, feebly punctured. Metanotum with central prominence smooth; acarinaria present laterally; entrance to acarinarium large, larger than that of caffer de Saussure, about 4 times longer than wide, width nearly constant throughout, only very slightly wider laterally; part of metanotum in front of slit of about same width as latter. Mesopleuron dull, with very close microscopic punctures and sparse coarse ones. Meta- pleuron dull, with similar but less pronounced puncturation and with some microscopic transverse striae on dorsal half; as in metanotalis Richards with a marked bean-shaped depression dorsally in the posterior boundary. Propodeum with angles rounded; posterior surface shallowly concave; spiracle long and narrow with anterior margin produced backwards. Fore tibial spur regularly curved, slightly recurved at apex; mid tibia with two spurs; larger spur of hind tibia bifid. Claws with a small tooth. Gaster dull, with exceedingly minute and close punctures, smaller than those of metanotalis Richards, and with very fine tomentum; larger punctures completely absent from all tergites; tergite 1 very transverse, nearly 34 times wider than long, a little constricted posteriorly, with a hyaline border; tergite 2 constricted anteriorly, maximum width 14 times greater than maximum width of tergite 1; tergite 3 of equal width anteriorly as tergite 2 posteriorly; tergites 3-6 becoming progressively narrower ; sternites nearly flat, very closely and finely punctured. Four mites are visible in the acarinaria. Ceramius bicolor (Thunberg) Philanthus bicolor Thunberg, 1815: 131, 289 []. Ceramius karooensis Brauns, 1902: 282, 9, 373, 3. Ceramius bicolor (Thunberg), Schulz, 1912: 68-69, 99; Bequaert, 1929: 79; Richards, 1962: 115, figs. 131, 132. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Aberdeen, xi. 1935, 3 dd; 8 92 (S.A.M. Staff); Murraysburg Dist., xi. 1935, 6 dd, 2 92 (S.A.M. Staff); Augusfontein (Calvinia), ix. 1947, g, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Oudtshoorn, Zebra, x. 1951, ¢ (S.A.M. Staff); Moordenaars Karoo, Lammerfontein, x. 1952, 3 2? (S.A.M. Staff); Willowmore—Vondeling, x. 1952, 2 (S.A.M. Staff); Rooinek Pass, x. 1952, ¢ (S.A.M. Staff); Tankwa Karoo, Waterval, xi. 1952, 25 dd; 85 99 (S.A.M. Staff) ; Touws River-Hondewater (18 miles E. of Touws River), xii. 1962, 5 dd, 5 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Bloutoring Station (30 miles E. of Touws River), xii. 1962, 9 99 (S.A.M. Staff). 228 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Ceramius linearis Klug Ceramius linearis Klug, 1824: 227, 3; Richards, 1962: 115, figs. 128-130, 113 (b). Ceramius (Paraceramius) linearis de Saussure, 1855: 71, 3. Ceramius fumipennis Brauns, 1902: 275, 3, 2; Bradley, 1922: 397 (correction of Brauns). _ Specimens examined: Cape Province: Algoa Bay, 25. xii. 1898, 3, 2 (Dr. H. Brauns); Dunbrody, 1g00, 9 (Rev. O’Neil); Aberdeen, xi. 1935, 9 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius capicola Brauns Ceramius capicola Brauns, 1902: 278, 3, 9; Bradley, 1922: 397; Richards, 1962: 117. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Willowmore, 1. x. 1899, 2 (Dr. H. Brauns); Somerset East, 25-30. xi. 1930, 2 99, g (R. E. Turner); Aberdeen, — X1. 1935, 736d; 3 9P (S.A.M. Staff); Murraysburg Dist., xi. 1935, 5 dd, 11 29 (S.A.M. Staff); Teekloof, Fraserburg Dist., xi. 1935, 5 dd, 2 (S.A.M. Staff); Oukloof, Fraserburg Road, xi. 1936, 2 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Richmond Dist., xi. 1939, ¢ (S.A.M. Staff); Oudtshoorn, Zebra, x. 1951, 5 dd, 9 (S.A.M. Staff). Ceramius socius Turner Ceramius socius Turner, 1935: 297, 5d, 2; Richards, 1962: 117, figs. 113 (a), 134-136. Specimens examined: Cape Province: Montagu, x—xi. 1919, 2 (Collector’s name not recorded) ; Worcester, ix. 1921, 2 dg, 2 99 (R. E. Turner) ; Verkeerde Vlei (Touws River—Hottentots Kloof), xii. 1962, 3, 13 92 (S.A.M. Staff); Constable, xii. 1962, 3 99 (S.A.M. Staff); Matroosberg Station, xii. 1962, J, ® (S.A.M. Staff); 8 miles N.E. of Touws River, xii. 1962, 9 (S.A.M. Staff). DISCUSSION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE GENUS Ceramius The genus Ceramius occurs in two widely separated geographical regions in the Old World, one being the extreme south-west of the Ethiopian Region and the other that portion of the Palaearctic bordering on the Mediterranean Sea. Thus, in the Ethiopan Region, the genus is in the main restricted to the Cape Province where it is found in Little Namaqualand, the South Western Cape, the Little Karroo and the southern parts of the Great Karroo. It does not extend further east than the Great Fish River. Outside the Cape Province, one species (damarinus Turner) is endemic to South West Africa (Kaokoveld and Ovamboland), and one Eastern Cape species (capicola Brauns) has been recorded from two localities (Kroonstad and Thaba Nchu) in the Orange Free State. This distribution has been plotted by means of a 4° square grid system on an outline plotting map (Map 1). In the Palaearctic, the genus occurs in Algeria, Morocco, Gibraltar, Portugal, Spain, the: south of France, Greece, Turkey, Russian Armenia and probably Israel. | Climatically the above areas are characterised by a predominantly winter rainfall while the vegetation is generally low and semi-desert in nature. Ghetininm- = 10 poe | sanawopry 009 10n. pnuBiee lopian the Eth ius in x ee I¢ € os ! 4 =| = fe < 6¢ =) <2) 2) | | = a le (<2) oO fx iS) ae sc a alice ie ) : el 4 Q on 1 : o) ~ Giesude- “gquaqiabysod 2221S reed 4 ects ee cy e) B a eS Seite BR : e) ol oO Mar |. Distribution of the genus Ceram 230 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM In South Africa, Ceramius favours those parts of the Karroid and False Karroid areas (as defined by Acocks, 1953) which lie within the winter rainfall region, though two of the nineteen species, damarinus Turner and capicola Brauns, have been recorded from summer rainfall regions. A study of the records shows that in the southern hemisphere no species flies earlier than September or later than March, while in the northern hemi- sphere no species flies earlier than March or later than August. In other words, flight is restricted to the dry spring and summer months succeeding the winter rainy season. Having ascertained where and when Ceramius occurs it seems of interest to examine the reasons. In this connection the biology of the genus has to be taken into account. As stated above, the adults fly during the dry months of the year succeeding the winter rainy season. During this time mating takes place and burrows lined with mud pellets are built in the ground and surmounted by mud chimneys. In these the eggs are deposited and, in the South African species at least, it is recorded by Brauns (1910, cited by Richards, 1962: 29) that the female continues to provision the young with pollen and nectar until these larvae are ready to pupate, when she seals the opening to the nest with a plug of mud. There is only one generation per year. Two requirements for the successful run of the life-history are immediately apparent: there must be a copious supply of pollen and nectar at the time the young are being reared and there must be an extended dry period, not only to allow the adult to collect this pollen and nectar but also on account of the fact that the burrows in the ground remain unplugged during the larval stage. Despite some possible protection afforded by the chimneys, the larvae would have little chance of survival in case of heavy rain. The combination of winter rainfall followed by an abundance of suitable flowers rich in pollen and nectar during an extended dry period is obviously the clue to the distribution of the genus Ceramius. The only areas fulfilling these requirements are those in which Ceramius occurs. In this connection it is likely that the flowers visited by Ceramius will prove to be low-growing Compositae and mesembryanthemums (Aizoaceae) which, following the winter rains, are such a striking feature of the semi-desert areas inhabited by Ceramius in South Africa. SUMMARY The account of the South African species of Ceramius included in the revision of the Masaridae by Richards (1962) is supplemented by the study of the material in the South African Museum collection. One new species, richardsi, and the hitherto unknown @ of clypeatus Richards and ¢ of metanotalis Richards are described as is also a specimen thought to be rex de Saussure. The locality records of all the specimens in the collection are given and the distribution of the genus in South Africa is mapped. Lastly the distribution of the genus as a whole is discussed with reference to the biology of these wasps. ba 6 ow CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF CERAMIUS LATREILLE 231 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. G. van Son of the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria for the loan of type material of peringuey: Brauns, clypeatus Richards and metanotalis Richards. The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper. REFERENCES Acocks, J. P. H. 1953. Veld types of South Africa. Mem. bot. Surv. S. Afr. 28: i-iv, 1-192. BEQuaAERT, J. 1928. A study of certain types of Diplopterous wasps in the collection of the British Museum. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 2: 138-176. BEQuAERT, J. 1929. A new Pscudomasaris from California, with some considerations on the Masarid wasps (Hymenoptera). Psyche 36: 61-88. BraDLey, J. C. 1922. The taxonomy of the Masarid wasps, including a monograph on the North American species. Univ. California Publ., Tech. Bull. 1: 369-464. Brauns, H. 1902-3. Beitrage zur Kenntnis siidafrikanischer Masariden (Hym.). <. Hymen., Dipt. 2: 181-185, 275-282, 373-374 (1902); 65-73 (1903). Brauns, H. 1910. Biologisches iiber siidafrikanische Hymenopteren. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 6: 384-387, 445-447. Brauns, H. 1913. Dritter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Masariden (Hym.) von Siidafrika. Ent. Mitt. 2: 193-209. Cameron, P. 1906. Descriptions of some new species of Hymenoptera from Pearston, Cape Colony. Trans. S. African phil. Soc. 16: 323-333. Kuuc, F. 1810. Einige neue Piezatengattungen. Mag. Ges. naturf. Freunde, Berlin 4: 31-45. Kuuc, F. 1824. Entomologische Monographien. Berlin. RicHarps, O. W. 1962. A revisional study of the Masarid wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespoidea). London. British Museum (Natural History). SaAussurE, H. de 1853. Note sur la tribu des Masariens, et principalement sur le Masaris vespi- formis. Ann. Soc. ent. France (3) 1: Bull.: xvii—xxi. Saussure, H. de 1854-5. Etudes sur Ja famille des Vespides, III. [Masaridae on pp. 1-96 ( = 1855) and on plates 1-5 ( = 1854).] ScHULTHEss, A von 1935. Some more South African Masaridae (Vespoidea). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 16: 383-390. Scuutz, W. H. 1912. Aelteste und alte Hymenopteren Skandinavischer Autoren. Berl. ent. Z. 57: 52-102. THUNBERG, C. P. 1815. Philanthi, generis insecti Hymenopteri, monographia. Nova Acta Soc. Sci. Uppsala 7: 126-139. Turner, R. E. 1935. Notes on the Masarid wasps of the genus Ceramius. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 15: 290-299. 7 yey Thy 1 y \ 7 i t J i 1 ' ’ is 7 ‘ ) : a4" LN ‘ i ‘ ; bs iG ae | ‘et , i i ay Yi ’ \ fe + i } i y an itn, BY Meme Lt hus AS ba ae ; Fil g2't' AN A telat cor iy” ee heen i he PAE MeO nd or ihe fo | ww ij F Aj ih, ; v ee if { ny bry ; te Wy \ ; MN MAR Fe I ER Fag |. Aili wt ‘ Ce a a By Raa} vm 4 f F ioe oe el ‘ re orm ee Te ee i e” : j Hip in aa a ee Le eee AR eB } rhe DANS it au! ne EAU HAS ee. by) AS ef ,) ea?) ; f b } iy | ; sb a i Li ” i 5 ‘. eee re ey WH Fe oat a BR Be oi \ ‘ft y " ; , Py Py i 7. ' * 1 4 id LP iy Ree TOMY Ta a Te” ae! A ee - l ‘ he f ny Es yes 4 F De AP tie Wie i a eee ea : Dey ae Pf i Wea? ‘ ai pee nN . ' { ‘ ® ¥ Ss Y! ‘ \ ‘ i 2 : { ; i } * ‘i ‘ i Fi : i ! 4 ‘ . ‘ » Dist i \ inal me Pen ya 1 5 ’ ] yt a v ; a ae y 4) Th pay? MEMES h A ‘ i 5 : fy iv vf c i % 4 i iT i L ' " 4 \ j At i" “ad pee , { b , : } U f * iy J, y " ‘ : - — i He al : ; " agi ' ? a “« ’ * - : ; ‘ : ,, ; ie Cae * id ee at ( 2 : « ‘ , . i? § \ A ee | ad ry if Hiss { ‘ He j eu, ue be x as Ww . , ‘ i s : t { 4 ! im ‘ 4 ‘ i , . f J, oe ete Ar gars, ‘a ft f 4 4 ‘ 1 4 ¥ iad i y + ads A a 6S iret GARE ait PR a OE Dar raat bat { ah i ’ I j ~ oe i ar \ n i N ee) é f Ae ‘ UF An f : ° ; i | Pat 5 ; ; i mre 0 | ca RP : , i * ia Ser ‘ & i k ui vet ie a r Wy 5 ~“ ; ; Wome ! . ‘al a a : f \ . ue) H Ta : Wi j 1 * v's 4 4 coke | ba ee ayy sy dot ae iA t a 6 Narita aa Vier ny aks ’ rR & pian j j Wel re. ; na a at . i f 4 ‘ iy te b 5 } Ur Waar weer: alert , 5 ah age : Uh aad! I Ry Pet fee rt : ve i ‘i ¥ \ rt : y } ye) $4 Fi f4 %, " i , i Pet neat } " 2} i Hi te) ' \ ¥ is H "' 7 y A ‘ \ a INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLE OF CONTENTS and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 42 in. x 7 in. (73 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n-s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmirH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: Page London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). 1 vy ar ’ } , { \ ’ Na soy as Py Re Oe 1 ey a , ¥ aa ee PS, . * A oo ae 4‘ ti Att 1 +1 ae : “\ j td hei + pa pis i iF ~ % he m7 “i rIAPO TOU] ‘& ~J L. D. BOONSTRA MUS. COMP. ro OL LIBRARY THE RUSSIAN DINOCEPHALIANa&avasy DEUTEROSAURUS UNIVERSITY September 1965 September Volume 48 Band Part 12 Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK ee hey 3» 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t-—p.i.), 5(2, 5, 7-9), 6(1, t.-p.i.), 7(1, 3), 8, 9(1-2), 10(1-9), 11(1-2, 7, t-p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4). Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 15C Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., — Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap THE RUSSIAN DINOCEPHALIAN DEUTEROSAURUS By L. D. Boonstra South African Museum, Cape Town CONTENTS 7 PAGE oe Introduction . : » | (283 | Deuterosaurus . . aud tog UY Lg Mnemeiosaurus . ; ic ge BOS Summary : , 286 MARV A Acknowledgements . 3.) 286 UNTY References : : #286 INTRODUCTION In recent compilative publications in English, German, Frenchand Russian the compilers Romer, von Huene, Piveteau and Orlov, in following the latest views of our Russian colleagues Efremov and Orlov, have added the weight of their authority to perpetuate some rather serious mistakes. I have, during a four weeks’ stay in Moscow, had the opportunity of study- _ nig the dinocephalian material housed in the Palaeontological Museum of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. and feel that a preliminary note pointing out these errors would be welcomed by those who have not had the opportunity of seeing the material for themselves. DEUTEROSAURUS Orlov in 1954 gave a full account of all the material he considered warran- ted inclusion under the appellation Deuterosaurus. This material consists of parts of two skulls, teeth and many postcranial bones of which there is little evidence of having been found in association. In fact, except in the case of some postcranial bones, there is definite evidence that they were not found in association. These separate finds have on various grounds been considered to belong to one and the same genus. This lumping together started on its false course seriously when Seeley in 1894 described specimen No. 2 and identified it as a second specimen referable to Eichwald’s type (No. 1) of Deuterosaurus and produced a composite drawing of a skull in which the type lower jaw, teeth and partial occiput were fitted to the distorted partial skull of No. 2 and associated with this some vertebrae, a femur, a radius, part of a humerus and scapula and parts of the pelvis. Eichwald’s type specimen (No. 1) consists of a lower jaw from which the nature of the incisors, canines and postcanines as well as that of the upper incisors and canines can be determined and fitting on to this are the posterior part of the lower jaw, suspensorium, parts of the occiput, braincase and subtemporal and suborbital arches. | 233 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (12), 1965: 233-236. 234 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM This specimen (No. 1) constitutes the type of Eichwald’s Deuterosaurus biarmicus. The Diagnostic Characters of the Genus DEUTEROSAURUS: 1+? Gan 9 2. Incisors and canines of the upper and lower jaws intermesh. Lower canine passes outward of upper jaw margin. . Incisors fairly long, with slight lingual step, unequally developed in the © different teeth and separated from the talon. : 5. Postcanines with bulbous spatulate crown; series short, probably not more than 8. Quadratojugal no longer a bone of the outer lateral surface. Quadrate posteriorly situated and lower jaw long. No boss on the angular. Slight indication of upward sweep of the premaxillaries. Snout probably higher than broad. Infra-temporal bar fairly weak with deep temporal fossa. Taxonomic Position of DEUTEROSAURUS: 1. Dental formula: 12 te 4 = oS I I eae It is evident that the type is poor and important diagnostic features are not preserved. Of the determinable characters none are typically tapinocephalian, but rather represent a mixture of anteosaurian and titanosuchian features. The anteosaurian features are: the short series of bulbously spatulate postcanine teeth; the fairly long incisors, but the lingual step is more pronounced than is usual in the better known anteosaurians: the medial shift of the quadratojugal, which is no longer a lateral surface bone; the slight upward sweep of the alveolar border of the premaxillaries; the snout probably higher than broad; the weak infra-temporal bar and deep temporal fossa. The titanosuchian features are: the intermeshing of the upper and lower canines with the lower canine passing outside the upper jaw; the absence of the angular boss and the general little pachyostosis. I would thus place Deuterosaurus in a separate family —Deuterosauridae— in the Infra-order Anteosauria. Postcranial Bones referred to DEUTEROSAURUS: The femur is represented by a number of specimens (Nos. 59, 13, 1/1326, 294/20, 72). All indicate a slender curved femur quite distinct from the femur of both Tapinocephalia and Titanosuchia, but ee similar to the few known femora of the South African Anteosauria. THE RUSSIAN DINOCEPHALIAN DEUTEROSAURUS 235 If the type jaws of Deuierosaurus are, as I am convinced, anteosaurian and the femora also anteosaurian it may very well be that the above specimens are correctly referred to Deuterosaurus, but they could equally well be referred to one or other of the other known Russian anteosaurians as e.g. Titanophoneus, Doliosauriscus, Syodon, Admetophoneus. The distal end of a humerus (No. 33) and the tibia (No. 86) also appear to be anteosaurian. MNEMEIOSAURUS Specimen No. 2, which Seeley (1894) mistakenly referred to Eichwald’s Deuterosaurus, consists of an incomplete and distorted skull from which few diagnostic features can be determined. : Diagnostic Characters of the Genus MNEMEIOSAURUS : ? I I+? 1. Dental formula: ts c> pe 2. Crown of postcanine tooth spatulate. 3. Intertemporal width small, with high and sharp parietal crest flanked by the postorbital. 4. Anterior to the temporal fossa proper there is a sloping surface, below the level of the dorsal surface proper, which is formed by the postfrontal, frontal and postorbital (cf. Phthinosuchus). Pachyostosis moderate. Skull and particularly the snout, high and apparently short. Orbit large. Postorbital bar slender, but forming a wide flange of bone Sspieelne the posterior bony face of the orbit (cf. Phthinosuchus). g. Vomers narrow, choanae short. 10. Pineal canal of moderate length. 11. Lacrimal with antero-dorsally directed process as in Ulemosaurus. 12. Vomers narrow and vaulted as in primitive gorgonopsians (Phthinosuchus), but posteriorly spatulate. Mnemeiosaurus, on the scanty evidence, is difficult to place taxonomically, but is probably a tapinocephalian as suggested by Nopcsa. The presence of a canine indicates a primitive form but otherwise it appears quite specialised. Provisionally it may be placed with the moschopids, where a form like Avenantia also has a narrow intertemporal region. COM DE Teeth referred to DEUTEROSAURUS: The teeth numbered No. 3, 4 and 5 and figured by Efremov (figs. 19, 20, 21) were not found in association with either specimens No. 1 or No. 2. They are quite distinct from the incompletely preserved incisors of the type of Deuterosaurus (No. 1) and no comparison is possible with the one incisor root preserved in Mnemeiosaurus (No. 2). 236 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The teeth in Deuterosaurus (No. 1) are slightly modified anteosaurian teeth. — Tooth No. 4 approaches most nearly to the incisor teeth of the Tapino- cephalidae. Teeth No. 3 and No. 4 may very well be of a form very close to Ulemosaurus. The incisor teeth hitherto considered as deuterosaurian are thus really typical of the Tapinocephalia and the real deuterosaurian incisors are really anteosaurian incisors. SUMMARY ~The Russian dinocephalian Deuterosaurus, is discussed after study of the material in Moscow and it is shown that some material has been erroneously included in this genus. It is considered that the type species, Deuterosaurus biarmicus Eichwald should be placed in the family Deuterosauridae, in the infra-order Anteosauria. Mnemeiosaurus, which was referred to Deuterosaurus, appears to be a tapinocephalian which might be placed provisionally with the moschopids. The true affinities of postcranial bones and teeth that had been referred to Deuterosaurus are considered. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS _. The author’s visit to Moscow was in part made possible by a special grant from the Department of Education, Arts and Science of the Government of the Republic of South Africa. In Moscow my work was greatly facilitated by the kind helpfulness of my colleagues Orlov, Tchudinov, Shishkin and Tatarinov. To them my sincerest thanks. _. The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper. REFERENCES BoonstrA, L. D. 1954. The cranial structure of the titanosuchian Anteosaurus. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. / 42: 108-148. BoonstrA, L. D. 1957. The moschopid skulls in the South African Museum. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 44: 15-38. Erremovy, I. A. 1954. [Fauna of terrestrial vertebrates in the Permian cuprous sandstones of the western part of the Ural Mountains regions.] Trud. Paleont. Inst., Akad Nauk SSSR 54: 1-416 (In Russian). . EICHWALD, E. von. 1848: Ueber die Saurier des kupferfiihrenden Zechsteins Russlands. Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou 21 (2): 136-204. Nopcsa, F. 1928. Palaeontological notes on reptiles. Geol. hung. (Palaeont.) 1 (1): 1-84. SEELEY, H. G. 1894. Researches on the structure, organization and classification of the fossil Reptilia. VIII. Further evidences of the skeleton in Deuterosaurus and Rhopalodon from the Permian rocks of Russia. Phil. Trans. (B) 185: 663-717. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TABLE OF CONTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 42 in. X 7 in. (74 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945- When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitTH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). = fy MUS. COMP. ZOOLs n f* Ae , — | > Oy < - AY “hs apete Wwe | LIERARY, Ren LIEUWE DIRK BOONSTRA FEB 7 1986 HARVARD UNIVERSIFY THE GIRDLES AND LIMBS OF THE GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE November 1965 November Volume 48 Band Part. 13° . Decl ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(1, 3, 5» 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t.—p.i.), 5(2, 5, 7-9), 6(1, t.——p.1.), 7(1, 2); 8, 9(1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, t-p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4)- Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 40C Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap ea Sy Ch THE GIRDLES AND LIMBS OF THE GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE By mus. COMP. ZCOL LIC RARY, LiEUWE Dirk BooNsTRA FEB ZY 19¢ ; Mo a bel South African Museum, Cape Town rm : . HARVARD (With 11 figures in the text) UNIVERSITY, CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . SE OE | Material. : ‘ - 2e77 Pectoral Girdle : . = 238 Pelvic Girdle . : 236 The Humerus . ‘ ire Phe Femur. eanzAe The Anterior Bpipodial ) Ag: The Manus . 2) 244 Posterior Epipodial . . 246 Mine Pes: 4 ‘ - 246 Discussion : : 5249 Summary : sae V24D) teed eesneats ‘ 12) 249 INTRODUCTION From the Tapinocephalus zone twelve gorgonopsian species have been described, each based on a single specimen, the number of genera being eleven. Of these eleven Watson has put eight into five separate families with the remaining three uncertain as to family. Only six species are based on adequate Skulls. Hitherto the postcranial skeleton in only one specimen has been described. In the South African Museum we have eighteen specimens and of these parts of the girdles and limbs are present in only six specimens. MATERIAL Specimens with parts of girdles and limbs preserved are: 8.A.M. 8950. Hipposaurus boonstrat. Holotype. Skull and most of the skeleton much damaged in oignasiiion by a labourer under direction of S.H. Haughton. Klein-Koedoeskop, Beaufort West, Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra 1928. S.A.M. 9012. Gorgonopsian. Isolated proximal end of a femur. Klein-Koedoeskop, Beaufort West. Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra 1929. 237 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (13), 1965, 237-249, 11 figs. 238 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM S.A.M. 9081. Hipposaurus major. Holotype. Skull, incomplete pectoral and pelvic girdles, distal end of front epipodial and incomplete manus. Klein-Koedoeskop, Beaufort West. Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra 1929. S.A.M. 9084A. ?Hipposaurus major. An isolated humerus lacking the proximal head. Rietkuil, Beaufort West. Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra 1929. S.A.M. 12010 Galesuchid? Bloemhof of Voélfontein, Prince Albert. Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra and Zinn 1956. S.A.M. 12118A. Galesuchid. Part of pelvis associated with a snout. Palmietfontein of Kruidfontein, Prince Albert. Low Tapinocephalus zone. Collected Boonstra and Zinn 1957. PECTORAL GIRDLE (Figs. 1 and 2) In the two species of Hipposaurus the two specimens have the pectoral girdle adequately preserved, but in neither is the cleithrum and in only one is the ossified sternum preserved in part. The coraco-scapula is well developed with the scapular blade lying at right angles to the vertebral axis but curving slightly around the thorax. The coracoidal plate is large and long and rests on the interclavicle. There is no supraglenoidal buttress or foramen. The scapular facet of the glenoid faces downwards and backwards and slightly outwards. The coracoidal facet faces upwards and slightly outwards. The precoracoid forms the anterior corner of the glenoid. Immediately anterior to the glenoid, but in a slightly higher level, the precoracoid is pierced by a fairly large foramen supracoracoideum. Above the glenoid on the posterior edge of the scapula is an indistinct scar for the origin of the scapular head of the triceps muscle. The coracoid is without..a process or even a scar for the origin of a coracoidal head of the triceps. The dermal clavicular girdle is well developed, except the cleithrum which was apparently a slender splint-like bone judging by the facet on the anterior edge of the scapular blade. The interclavicle is well developed with a broad spatulate anterior expan- sion curving slightly upwards, a constricted waist and a fairly long and broad tongue-like posterior part. The anterior spatulate end is underlain in its lateral part by the broad ventral end of the clavicula, which ends well away from the middle line and GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 239 Fig. 1. Hipposaurus boonstrai. Holotype. S.A.M. 8950. Pectoral girdle x 4. a. Lateral. b. Ventral Fig. 2. Hipposaurus major. Holotype. S.A.M. 9081. Pectoral girdle x 4. a. Lateral. >. Ventral. which has no posteriorly directed process to underlie the interclavicle in posterior direction as is the case in the pristerognathid clavicle. From its broad, ventral expansion the clavicle sweeps upwards with a rather slender process lying externally and extending slightly anterior to the curved anterior edge of the scapulo-coracoid. Its upper extremity is applied to the anterior scapular edge, where it also meets the ventral end of the cleithrum. The sternum is ossified as a flattish disc-like element lying above the posterior end of the interclavicle. No facets for the ribs can be seen. PELvic GIRDLE (Figs. 3 and 4) The two specimens of the two species of Hipposaurus have the pelvic girdle preserved in part. In both the iliac blade is poorly preserved, but the 240 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM eee mem em ead Ries ‘e - . . . ‘ ¢ . ‘ Wess “i J Fig. 4. Galesuchid. S.A.M. 12118 A. Pelvic girdle x 4. a. Lateral b. Ventral. Fig. 3. Hipposaurus major. Holotype. S.A.M. 9081. Pelvic girdle x 4. a. Lateral. b. Ventral . two ventral elements are adequately represented. Associated with a snout identified as a galesuchid species there is the left half of a pelvis with a damaged iliac blade, a good pubis and an incomplete ischium. From this inadequate material it would appear that the oldest gorgonop- sians of the Tapinocephalus zone had a low, long pelvic girdle, flattish in its pubic part and V-shaped in its ischiadic part. The ilium was apparently low. Its blade has little or no anterior process, but with a well developed long but low posterior process. The supra-acetabular edge is sharp with only a weak supra-acetabular buttress, but with a distinct supra-acetabular notch. The ilium forms about half of the large outwardly facing acetabulum. The pubes form a flat pelvic floor, long but not very broad. The pubic tubera are weakly developed, but the lateral edge in Hipposaurus is strong and girder-like. Each pubis is pierced by a fairly large foramen lying some distance anterior to the posterior pubic edge, facing ventrally it is obscured in lateral view by the girder-like thickened outer pubic edge. Ventrally the two pubes do M s a GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 241 not form a keel, where they meet in the median line. In the median line a diamond-shaped lacuna separates the pubes from the ischia. The ischia meet in the middle line as a strong symphysis forming a well developed ventral keel. Together they are broader than the pubes and also longer. The postero-lateral corners, although thickened, are hardly tuber-like. The ischium forms a strong posterior rim to the acetabulum. THE HuMERuS (Figs. 5 and 6) In the holotype of Hipposaurus boonstrai there is a good complete right, humerus and the distal end of the left humerus. In addition I have the distal. three-quarters of a larger humerus found unassociated with any other part of the skeleton, which I tentatively identify as that of ?AHipposaurus major. a b E Fig. 5. Hipposaurus boonstrai. Holotype. S.A.M. 8950. Humerus x 4}. a. Ventral in orthoprojection on the distal expansion. b. Dorsal in orthoprojection on the distal expansion. c. Posterior in orthoprojection on the distal expansion. Ulna and radius x 4. d. Anterior. ec. Median. f. Lateral or outer view of the ulna. The hipposaurid humerus is relatively a long slender bone with a long slender shaft and both the proximal as well as the distal ends moderately expanded. There is a considerable ‘twist’ on the shaft so that the ends subtend an angle of about 70°. In the figures the views called dorsal, ventral and posterior are ortho- projections on to the plane in which the distal condyles lie. The caput is terminal, narrowly oval, flowing into the processus medialis and lateralis, both indistinctly demarcated. The delto-pectoral crest is of moderate size with no distinct pectoralis tuber. The bicipital fossa is deep and 242 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM long. The surface for the origin of the medial humeral head of the triceps is well developed. Midway on the shaft there is on the ventral surface a strong ridge lying somewhat posteriorly, flanked by a groove on its postaxial side. This would appear to serve for the insertion of the m. coraco-brachialis longus. The distal end is remarkable in that no epicondylar foramina are present. In ventral view a longitudinal groove can be seen near the postaxial edge, which is sharp and bent backwards, and this entepicondylar groove housed the median vessels usually passing through the entepicondylar foramen. A similar edge and groove, but of much weaker development on the radial side carried the radial vessels which pass through the ectepicondylar foramen when this is present. Distally the entepicondyle is better developed than the ectepicondyle. Oe Fig. 6. ?Hipposaurus major. S.A.M. 9084A. Humerus x 4. a. Ventral. 6. Dorsal. c. Posterior. Both condyles are well modelled. The radial condyle forms a prominent oval capitellum which faces mostly ventrally. The ulnar condyle lying further distally curves around the end of the bone on to the dorsal surface, where proximally lies a deep, well excavated trochlear fossa. Ventrally the brachialis fossa is very shallow, giving the hipposaurid humerus a quite different appear- ance from that of the other therapsids where there is a well developed entepi- condylar foramen. THE FEMUR (Fig. 7) In the type specimen of Hipposaurus boonstrai there are a good right femur and the proximal and distal ends of the left femur. The only additional material GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 243 at my disposal is a proximal end found as an isolated fragment and thus only subordinately identifiable. The hipposaurid femur is a long lightly built bone with very moderately expanded proximal and distal ends. It is sigmoidally curved with the ends subtending an angle of about 30°. The caput femoris is terminal, but through the preaxial curvature on the shaft, it is somewhat preaxially directed. The external trochanter is not very clearly demarcated. In ventral view the proximal end of the femur is most peculiar. Halfway along the bone the ventral surface of the shaft has a low curvature in section. In proximal direction in the midline a low ridge becomes pro- gressively developed, with the surface both pre- and postaxially becoming only slightly hollowed out in section. This ridge then ends abruptly with a sharp oblique edge. This ridge representing a remnant of the primitive ‘Y’ q b ‘¥ d @ fi Fig. 7. Femora x 4. Hipposaurus boonstrai. Holotype. S.A.M. 8950. a. Dorsal. 6. Ventral. c. Anterior. Gorgonopsian. S.A.M. go12A. d. Dorsal. e. Ventral. f. Posterior. system, represents the internal trochanter. Proximal to the internal trochanter the preaxial edge is strongly rounded and postaxially a hollow represents the intertrochanteric fossa. Distally of the internal trochanter there is no indication of a separate fourth trochanteric ridge for the m. coccygeo-femoralis. On the dorsal proximal surface there is a weak ridge near the preaxial edge for the insertion of the m. pubo-ischio-femoralis internus and externally of this ridge a shallow depression for the insertion of the m. ilio-femoralis. The distal condyles for the reception of the tibia are terminal with the fibula articulating with the outer face of the ectocondyle. The other gorgonopsian femur available differs considerably from that of the above hipposaurid. 244 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The external trochanter is clearly demarcated and on the dorsal preaxial edge there is a distinct pubo-ischio-femoralis internus ridge flanked by a groove. On the ventral surface there is a distinct low mound distally of the inter- trochanteric fossa constituting a separate internal trochanter. Distally of this lies a long low ridge to which the m. coccygeo-femoralis was attached and this constitutes the fourth trochanter. Tue ANTERIOR EPIPODIAL (Figs. 5d, e, and f and 8) In Hipposaurus boonstrai there is a good left and parts of the right epipodial, whereas in H. major only the distal ends of the radius and ulna are preserved. Both radius and ulna are long slender bones. The radius has a well modelled proximal facet, cup-like to fit closely on to the well modelled capitellum of the humerus. On the postaxial corner of the radius there is a well developed flange for the insertion of the biceps. The proximal postaxial edge of the radius fits against the rim of the sigmoid fossa of the ulna. The ulna is much longer than the radius, with its sigmoid fossa and olecranon process lying proximally of the proximal radial facet. The sigmoid fossa is formed by the preaxial surface of the olecranon and the proximal surface of the coronoid process. It fits accurately round the trochlea of the humerus to form an efficient hinge-joint. Proximally of the sigmoid fossa the olecranon carries a very well developed process, broad but dorso-ventrally compressed. In extension this process passes into the deep olecranon fossa on the dorsal surface of the humerus. In the type specimen of Hipposaurus major the distal end of the radius is seen to have a large oval facet for its articulation with the radiale. A similar facet on the ulna articulates with both intermedium and ulnare. THE MANus (Fig. 8) In 1935 I gave a figure and description of the badly damaged carpus of Hipposaurus boonstrai. Now I have the carpus of Hipposaurus major prepared by myself with the aid of adequate equipment and from this specimen one gets a better picture of the structure of the hipposaurid carpus. In the proximal row there are three bones, with an additional large disc- like pisiforme postaxially. The radiale is a stout bone with a large oval proximal facet for the radius and distally a smaller facet for the first centrale. On its curved postaxial surface the intermedium and second centrale are articulated. The intermedium has a well developed dorsal surface as the bone is not compressed from side to side. Proximally a good oval facet faces the inner part of the distal ulnar facet and a similar facet distally meets the second centrale distally. | The ulnare is an elongated fairly flattened bone with expanded ends and a GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 245 Fig. 9. Hipposaurus boonstrai. Holotype. S.A.M. 8950 x #4. Hind epipodial. ¥ @ ‘ ‘ Fig. 8. Epipodial and manus in ve iy dorsal view x 4. Hipposaurus she oT major. Holotype. S.A.M. 9081. - slightly constricted waist. The proximal facet is a long oval and distally a similar facet meets the enlarged fused fourth and fifth distal carpals. The first centrale is a curiously shaped bone, distally it has two facets for the first two distal carpals, a proximal facet for the radiale and postaxially a curved face is applied to the concave face of the second centrale. The second centrale is larger, but also curiously shaped with two distal facets, one for the third distal and the other for that part of the fused element constituting the fourth distal. Proximally it has good contact with the intermedium and preaxially two faces fit against the radiale and first centrale respectively. There are four distal carpals. The first large, the second and third smaller and the fourth a large element representing a fusion of the fourth and fifth. All five metacarpals are completely and well preserved. The first metacarpal is the shortest with an expanded proximal end matching the large first distal; but the distal end is unexpanded. 246 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The second metacarpal is longer with both ends expanded and a long constricted shaft. The third metacarpal is even longer with a well expanded and well modelled distal end. The fourth metacarpal is the longest bone of the metapodium, with both ends expanded and the distal well modelled. The fifth metacarpal is of distinctive shape; its proximal end has its facet for the fused fourth and fifth distal directed preaxially and its distal end is not expanded. Of the digits only the proximal ends of the first four phalanges are preserved. POSTERIOR EPIPODIAL (Fig. 9) The right epipodial is well and completely preserved and the left incom- pletely in the type specimen of Hipposaurus boonstrai. It is composed of two long bones with the tibia fairly robust and the fibula of lighter build. The tibia is a straight bone, but the fibula is much curved so that there is a good spatium interosseum. In the fibula the two ends are expanded with the proximal end the stronger. In the tibia the distal end is only moderately expanded, whereas the proximal end is quite massive. This meets the femoral condyles end on, whereas the proximal end of the fibula is applied in a sliding joint to the post- axial epicondyle. On its dorsal face the tibia has proximally a strongly developed cnemial crest, which extends far proximally fitting into the intercondylar sulcus of the femur and gives a good surface for the insertion of the tendon of the femoro- tibialis and associated muscles. Distally the tibia is applied to the rounded knob-like facet on the astragulus and the fibula to a similar facet on the calcaneum. Tue PEs (Fig. 10) In the holotype of Hipposaurus boonstrai there are a good right pes and parts of the left foot. Since my original description in 1934 I have been enabled by better equipment to expose the tarsal elements more fully. This applies par- ticularly to the astragulus, which is now also visible from the plantar surface. The calcaneum is most peculiar, but its structure can be easily derived from the typical disc-like element found in most therapsids. In its distal part the calcaneum is typically therapsid and its distinctive shape is due to the additional development of a strong well modelled tuber proximally. Distally the calcaneum has a slightly domed dorsal surface and a broad distal facet for the large conjoined fourth and fifth distal tarsals. Further proximally the dorsal surface carries a strong rounded facet for the fibula. Proximally of this GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 247 facet a strong hook-like curved tuber is developed, with postaxially a strong rounded ridge running from the fibular facet to the extremity of the tuber. Between this ridge and the fibular facet there is a saddle-shaped excavation. Preaxially the calcaneum is applied to the astragulus so that the fibular and tibial facets lie in the same plane as also the distal facets of the two bones. The cruro-tarsal articulation thus lies in one plane. In plantar view it is seen that the calcaneum in its preaxial part is overlain by the astragulus. The astragulus has on its proximal dorsal surface a strong rounded knob- like facet for the tibia. Distal to this knob there is a deep transverse groove, with distally a shallowly concave upper surface passing distally into the distal facet for the centrale. In my original description I thought that this groove Fig. 10. Hipposaurus boonstrat. Holotype. S.A.M. 8950 x #4. a. Dorsal view of pes as reconstructed. 6. Plantar view of astragalus and calcaneum. indicated a line of junction between two formerly separate elements, but the exposure of the plantar surface does not support this view. Preaxially it can now be seen, particularly in plantar view, that the astragalus extends further than shown in my original figure. In plantar view this preaxial extension is seen to form a strong process with a downwardly directed thick rounded edge. The single centrale is a peculiar wedge-shaped bone lying transversely between the astragalus and the first two distal tarsals. The greatly enlarged fused fourth and fifth distal tarsal has a very similar wedge shape and lies between the calcaneum and the third distal and articu- lating with the fourth and fifth metatarsals. 248 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The first distal tarsal is of most unusual shape. It is a large elongated bone looking much more like a shortened metatarsal than a distal tarsal. The second distal is a small squarish bone articulating with the centrale and the second metatarsal. The third distal is larger and lies between the fused fourth and fifth tarsal and the third metatarsal. The metatarsals are all long bones with expanded ends and slender shafts, except the first which is quite short. The phalanges are only completely preserved in the fourth and fifth digits. The phalangeal formula can thus be given as 2, 3, 4, 4, 3. The second phalanx of the third digit is much reduced and in a near descendant of Hipposaurus one can expect a formula of 2, 3, 3, 4, 3 which would later become 2, 3, 3, 3, 3. In another specimen, S.A.M. 12010, which is in all probability a galesuchid, and prepared for study since the above was written, there are associated with fragments of skull and vertebrae much weathered parts of the limbs, including the proximal part of a tarsus, an ulna and the middle part of a manus. The ulna has its sigmoid face not situated medially, nor does it have the well developed proximal process to the olecranon as in Hipposaurus. The ulna thus agrees more with the ulnae as known in later gorgonopsians. The proximal tarsals merit description (fig. 11). qd b Fig. 11. Hipposaurid. S.A.M. 12010 X 1. The proximal tarsal bones of the left hind foot. a. Dorsal. 6. Ventral. As—astragalus Ca —calcaneum fe — facet for the centrale ff — facet for the fibula f4 — facet for the fourth distal t . — tuber calcis tf — facet for the tibia. The calcaneum is a large element which still retains some of the characters of the primitive flattened disc-shaped structure, but in its proximal part shows GORGONOPSIA OF THE TAPINOCEPHALUS ZONE 249 highly advanced characters, viz. the facet for the fibula no longer lies proxi- mally but is shifted on to the dorsal surface and protruding backwards it shows a quite well developed tuber separated from the fibular facet by a deep groove. In ventral view it is clearly seen that the astragalus overlies the calcaneum medially. Here the calcaneum has a well developed process extending under the astragalus and this process can be considered a sustentaculum tali. The gorgonopsians from so low down as the Tapinocephalus zone are thus the first therapsids to show this typical mammalian structure. The astragalus is a much smaller bone than the calcaneum and has a most remarkable facet for the tibia raised well above the base of the bone as a high eminence. The distal facets of both the calcaneum and astragalus for the fourth distal and centrale, respectively, are very well modelled. DIscussION A comparative account will be given in a subsequent paper, when I have completed my study of the other therapsids of the Tapinocephalus zone. SUMMARY Descriptions are given of the girdles and limbs of the Gorgonopsia of the Tapinocephalus zone in South Africa. Of the eighteen specimens in the South African Museum, six have parts of the girdles and limbs present, and this account is based on these specimens. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper. yt » Se ip i rt): : + eat ty she ee eres odiane eee eh. * ee ee ae LAER 0 Mowatt iyer oly ki Madi eneraeE ie DORAL hie poured, 6 eee eee 4 ; ) ; Me . ‘ © ; . j 2 i 7 4 4 b 7 1 FI ‘ : ’ ' - " ~ + } ‘ J e ‘ y. ~ ¢ 4 4)» “ Y : “4 i iy " Lek p . | a oo ‘we 'y i \ i . . ’ ; I ’ i j ¥ | : J A | Ne, x \ : ' if | » yak ul t a) | | : : : y | : : s ; INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including Taste or CoNTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. x 7 in. (7% in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmirH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ; r { ys i ‘ ag , ew kD q j i ¥ i 5 it * a ? Cra is + sath) t Ua ~ i Kj ‘ iid i .\ aes rary ru ; hy ‘ Us LA) We fr ee ee \ ' . ‘ i, : f “ \ a . ; ' a *) , eit / Ad x \ j t > ae e' . 4 c ae a Pa Tue. wee, ee eye af (Oh iy Cer 2g aay Chee hae enn traectehi oli bie Daal A eal eae y ori ‘lhe c etre ‘wel nak bY, HER dik og.” on ue a a ela | al tou eee Zope sul sd leteh | fers! i ni fei’ saath peer toe i stm Sinan baagst EAL - Clapcte wn] MUS. COMP. ZCOL LIEUWE DIRK BOONSTRA LIERARY. FEB @ (009 HARVARD THE SKULL OF UNIVERSITY STRUTHIOCEPHALUS KITCHINGI November 1965 November Volume 48 Band Fart. ) 14." Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1, 2(1, 3, 5) 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t--p.), 5(2, 5, 7-9); 6(1, t.—p.i.), 7(1, 3)> 8, 9(1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7 t.——p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4). Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel 5oc Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap | — ili i eC bh rv a S : Aes 1 gpa tne | MUS. COMP. ZCOL y. LIERARY BEB 1905 HARVARD THE SKULL OF STRUTHIOCEPHALUS KITCHING] “VERS By LIEUWE DIRK BOONSTRA South African Museum, Cape Town (with 11 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Povroduction (204. 5) "50's 3! Q5T Description eat aitice y oahti te “rane PUANEVINSIONE LT G4 hi nit sh)! ol) ie tas, 'BB5 Summary . Terediwans 94.205 a eas ay ay L205 PReIPPenCeg! 2.4/4 ie pa. «&, 205 INTRODUCTION Since Brink’s description in 1958 of the type skull (B.P.I. 284) found on De Bad, Beaufort West by Kitching, the author with H. Zinn and H. Boonstra had the good fortune to excavate a second skull (S.A.M. K272) on Perdefontein, Beaufort West in 1960. This skull was found in situ lying upside down with parts of the lower jaws exposed and the rest intact in a mudstone matrix. Unfortunately the exposed lower jaws have suffered from weathering which has destroyed the posterior parts of both rami. The palatal surface of the skull was firmly encased in a jacket of reinforced plaster and the massive skull could be lifted in one piece. On preparation the skull proved to be very well preserved and only very slightly distorted. On study it became apparent that this specimen shows a number of structural features much better than the type specimen does. Certain additions to Brink’s description can thus be made and in the sequel it will also become clear that I differ in interpretation on a number of points, even if allowance is made for considerable individual variation. A correction has also to be made in regard to the type species due to Brink having misread Broom. The species whaitsi has as its holotype the skull (S.A.M. 2678) from Vivier, Beaufort West and the second specimen mentioned by Broom consists of a skull and much of the skeleton (S.A.M. 3012) from Abrahamskraal, Prince Albert. Broom rightly thought that the second specimen belonged to the same species as the holotype skull. dines are thus two skulls and one skeleton. 251 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (14), 1965, 251-265, 11 figs. 252 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM DESCRIPTION Build and carriage of the skull The fronto-nasal boss in my specimen is very like that of the type, but I do not think that it represents a horn-core. In the collection of the South African Museum there are over two dozen skulls of Struthiocephalus and Kerato- cephalus. ‘These all have a fronto-nasal boss developed to a varying degree and in all of them the sculpturing of the boss is very similar to that of the skull in general. If the boss were a horn-core one would have expected its surface to differ from that of the general skull sculpturing. That the boss could have been used as a battering ram is most probable, but then without a special horn covering. There is no doubt about the hang-dog carriage of the skull in Struthio- cephalus. As a matter of fact this applies to all the tapinocephalians in general —also to those without a naso-frontal boss. The struthiocephalines, with their long snouts and anteriorly directed upper front teeth, undoubtedly fed on softer vegetable matter than the moschopines. Their limbs have also been shown to be more adapted to marshy conditions and Brink’s suggestion that the struthiocephalines may even have fed duck-like under water is quite probable. The surface moulding of the bone around the nostrils—especially of the septomaxilla—suggests the presence of musculature for the closing off of the nostril. The structure of the skull Although the present skull is very well preserved and prepared a number of sutures cannot be traced with absolute certainty. This is due to a number of factors such as the rugose nature of the outer surfaces, closure of sutures, fusion of elements and small displacements. When comparing the figures given here with those of the type skull, and also with those of other species of the genus the effects of the pachyostosis should be born in mind. The pachy- ostosis in the tapinocephalians is to some extent individual with differences often seen between the relations and extent of the two bones of a pair in the same skull. Age is also a factor. Differences that have been given as specific are often due to differences in the tempo of the pachyostosis in adjoining bones. Thus a strong pachyostotic development in, for instance, the postfrontal, causes an overlap or overgrowth over the adjoining bones and affects the relative size and shape of the outer surfaces of these bones. Where, however, authors show a radical difference in the relations of bones errors of observation and/or interpretation must be considered probable. Lateral and dorsal surfaces. (Figs. 1 and 2) In comparing my figures with those of Brink it is manifest that the type skull has been subjected to dorso-ventral compression. The effects are especially « obvious in the nature and disposition of the lateral pterygoid flange and the THE SKULL OF STRUTHIOCEPHALUS KITCHINGI 253 quadrate. It should, moreover, be borne in mind that my figures are ortho- projections and not perspective drawings. This would in part account for the fact that in my figures the tabular is visible in dorsal view and in lateral view _ forms much of the posttemporal bar. But in my specimen the tabular is really ~ much more developed and in its forward growth overlaps much of the lateral Fic. 1. Struthiocephalus kitchingi. S.A.M. K272 x 1/6. Lateral view. Orthoprojection on to the sagittal plane. AN—angular. AR —articular. D—dentale. eam—external auditory meatus. F—frontal. [P—inter- or postparietal (dermo-supraoccipital). J—jugal. L—lacri- mal. M—maxilla. N—nasal. P—parietal. PAL—palatine. PM—premaxilla. PO —postorbital. POF—postfrontal. PRF—prefrontal. PT—pterygoid. Q— quadrate. QJ—quadratojugal. SA—surangular. SM—septomaxilla. smf—septo- maxillary foramen. SQ—squamosal. T—tabular. TR—transversum (ecto- pterygoid). 254 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM tongue of the parietal which is wedged in between the tabular and the upsweep- ing process of the squamosal. In my specimen the postorbital is more developed and this at the expense of the postfrontal. This particularly affects the appearance of the postorbital bar as seen in dorsal view. Fic. 2. Struthiocephalus kitchingt. S.A.M. K272 x 1/6. Dorsal view. Orthoprojection on to the alveolar plane. Brink figures the squamosal as entering the ventral orbital border, whereas in my specimen the jugal extends posteriorly, ventral to the postorbital and forms nearly all of the ventral rim of the orbit with a small contribution by the postorbital. This is the normal relation, not only in the tapinocephalids THE SKULL OF STRUTHIOCEPHALUS KITCHINGI 255 but also in all the other Dinocephalia (anteosaurids, titanosuchids, styraco- cephalids and the Russian brithopids). Brink’s figure indicates an error in observation. In the present specimen the outer surface of both septomaxillaries is well preserved and this shows a distinctive moulding of the posterior border of the nostril to form a rounded swollen rim set off by the presence of a lateral groove. I suggest that this moulded structure indicates attachments for a valvular closure of the nostril when the animal is feeding with the snout submerged. Occiput. (Fig. 3) The occiput is low and broad with the squamosals bulging laterally to form prominent ‘cheeks’. A strong rounded thickened upper and lateral border formed by the interparietal and the tabulars prominently demarcates a deep bipartite area of origin for the nuchal muscles. The interparietal and the tabulars have large posterior faces, whereas the supraoccipital is very low. The large face of the paroccipital is directed much more ventrally than posteriorly. The ridge on the squamosal bounding the external auditory meatus medially is very prominent. The posttemporal fossa is all but closed by the downgrowth Fic. 3. Struthiocephalus kitchingt. S.A.M. K272 x 1/6. Occipital view. Orthoprojection at right angles to the sagittal and alveolar planes. BO — basioccipital. EO—exoccipital. fq—quadrate foramen. jf—jugular foramen. mp—mastoid process of the paroccipital. pin—pineal (parietal) foramen. POC—paroccipital. ptf—post- temporal fenestra. ptpocf—pterygo-paroccipital fenestra. SO—supraoccipital. ST—stapes. stf—stapedial foramen. Other lettering as for Fig. 1. 256 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM of the tabular. The stapes is seen to lie diagonally with the distal end lying low down in the recess on the quadrate. Little is seen of the posterior face of the quadrate in this view because of its horizontal disposition. The occipital condyle is directed much ventrally with the exoccipitals forming most of the posterior face and the basioccipital facing mainly ventrally. Ventral surface. (Fig. 4) Comparing my figure of the ventral surface to that given by Brink a number of differences are apparent, apart from the fact that mine is a projection and Brink’s a perspective drawing. The differences are in main due to the fact that the present specimen being uneroded is in a much better state of preserva- — tion. The regions mainly affected are the transverse processes of the pterygoids, quadrate and stapes, the occipital condyle and the relations of the supra- occipital, interparietal, tabular and squamosal. In the present specimen the lateral flanges of the pterygoids form well demarcated deep transverse ridges extending far ventrally in their lateral parts, lying far below the level of the quadrate rami. In its lateral part the quadrate ramus forms a deep vertical flange of bone which meets the quadrate along a large synchrondrotic face. More © medially the pterygoid is deeply vaulted and sends a process posteriorly which abuts against the paroccipital at a level higher than the quadrate process of the paroccipital. The quadrates are well preserved and carry cotyli shaped as shown in the figure. The stapedial recess is well preserved on both sides. Both stapes are well preserved and are seen to lie diagonally with the distal ends lying well anterior to the plane of the fenestrae ovales. The occipital condyle is a prominent large knob roughly circular in outline with its articular face directed only slightly posterior off the ventral. The exoccipitals form more of the articular face than is shown in Brink’s figure. The paroccipital has a large ventral face. Medio-anteriorly it has a process meeting the prodtic above the level of the fenestra ovalis. Latero- anteriorly there is a long quadrate process applies to the quadrate and ter- minating posterior to the stapedial recess. At a higher level the quadrate TF | t : : process of the paroccipital has a thin flange of bone whose anterior edge meets © a process of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid. Posterolaterally the par- occipital develops an everted thickened edge underlying the squamosal to form a mastoid process. The supraoccipital is wide but low and the posttemporal fossa all but obliterated by the overgrowth of the large paroccipital. The ~ tabular has a large ventral face which, however, does not extend anteriorly — between the paroccipital and squamosal as shown by Brink in his figure of the © type. The squamosal carries a prominent ridge, roughly comma-shaped in ? outline, and this forms the internal limit of the external auditory meatus j developed as an antero-posteriorly directed groove. THE SKULL OF STRUTHIOCEPHALUS KITCHINGI 257 t.—p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4)- Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel 25c } Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap Ss _ fit — C. On els wr] MUS. COMP, ZOOL: LIERARY, FEB @ 1065 A NEW PALAEONISCID FISH FROM THE WITTEBERG SERTERVARD (LOWER CARBONIFEROUS) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA By R. A. JuBB Albany Museum, Grahamstown. (With 1 plate and 2 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction .. Lith. LeGy Genus Mentzichthys nov. . . 270 Mentzichthys walshi sp. nov. . 270 Discussion. . He ran ea 2 Acknowledgments IP W272 Summary. . a Mer ore) 2g References soit ig se Ls 7S INTRODUCTION In May 1963 Mr. G. Walsh, an official of the Sundays River Irrigation Board, discovered a deposit of fossil fishes in the mountains just south of Lake Mentz and close to the entrance of Karroo Poort. Mr. J. J. G. Blignaut, a retired geologist, visited the site immediately and confirmed the importance of its discovery. Since the beds are well exposed, from the upper portion of the Witteberg quartzites through the complete sequence of Upper Witteberg Shales to the Dwyka Tillite, it was possible for Mr. J. A. Marais of the Geologi- cal Survey Department to determine the geological horizon on which the fossil fish occur. The fossiliferous bed, which is nearly vertical and from three to six inches thick, occurs 740 feet above the topmost white quartzite of the Witteberg and in the upper shales which were formerly known as the Lower Dwyka Shales. These shales are regarded as of lacustrine origin. Lithologically, according to Haughton (1963), the Series, as now defined, consists of fine-grained thinly bedded whitish quartzites intercalated with dark green or blue (buff when weathered) micaceous shales and flagstones. Locally lenses of grey sandy limestone or calcareous quartzite, sometimes carrying plant fragments, are present, as well as bands of coarse grit. The uppermost member (formerly Lower Dwyka Shales) consists mainly of greenish and bluish shales and flagstones with some hard sandstone bands. The most characteristic fossil in the quartzites of the series is the spiral 267 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (15), 1965: 267-272, 1 pl., 2 figs. 268 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM impression known as Spirophyton which is characteristic of the Middle Devonian of America. Other fossils previously discovered, although scanty, include Bothrodendron, Cyclostigma (characteristic of the Carboniferous of Queensland and New South Wales), Didymophyllum, Halonia, Knorria, Lepidodendron, Lepido- strobus, Singularia, Selaginites and Stigmaria. Fragments of the body segments of a eurypterid named Hastimima have also been discovered, as well as some fish scales. A recent discovery by Mr. J. A. Marais is a species of Psilophyton. In age Du Toit (1954) considers these non-marine beds, about 4,000 feet in _ thickness, to embrace the whole time interval from about the Middle Devonian to the Lower Carboniferous, and it is to this latter period that the Lake Mentz fish fossil bed appears to belong. An outstanding feature of the exposed section of the fossil bed is the concentration of fish impressions it contains. This concentration spoils what could have been, in many cases, perfect impressions. As stated above, the maximum thickness containing fishes varies from three to six inches but the extent of the bed is unknown as it dips and disappears. Under normal circum- stances sediments of this thickness would represent an appreciable interval of time, but, from the great number of fishes overlapping one another, and the disposition of some, it is evident that a mass mortality involving a large concentration of Palaeozoic fishes occurred. Such a mass mortality, followed by perfect preservation, could only have taken place if the primeval pool of lake they were inhabiting was completely frozen over in the first place. Total freezing would have resulted first in the concentration of fish in the bottom layers, then asphyxiation followed by preservation in the bottom muds under << ae freezing conditions before being finally entombed by some major earth or _ glacial movement. The open mouths of many of the fishes suggest asphyxiation due either to deoxygenation of the water by the fishes themselves, or to their being forced down into a deoxygenated hypolimnion. Although the Witteberg Series is associated with lacustrine conditions, certainly non-marine, it would be misleading to regard the Lake Mentz fossils as being those of entirely freshwater species. Of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic fishes described from southern Africa many belong to widely distributed genera and families which are associated with both marine and non-marine formations. Rayner (1958) quoting Gunter points out that, as a general rule, marine fishes are more tolerant of fresh waters than vice versa. There is ample evidence of this today where marine species such as Carcharinus leucas, Pristis microdon, Megalops cyprinoides and Glossogobius giuris are all found up to 300 miles by river from the sea in many of the rivers of the east coast of Africa. The Lake Mentz fossil fishes represent two distinct species and possibly a third. Of the two more complete species one is a platysomid-like fish with very large dorsal ridge scales, and the other a slender stream-lined palaeoniscid which is described below as representing a new genus and species. The generic name refers to the type locality and the specific name is in honour of the discoverer of the fossil bed. 269 NEW PALAEONISCID FISH FROM WITTEBERG SERIES ‘repndeoserdns ‘QSg ‘Saejnorodoqns "qOg_ ‘TeMqsoqns “OS *¢yesso1jsod dos WLd {remosdosid -qog ‘yetqsoyod ‘Od = *[etquoyue -o]]ixewoid “yw {jejued yg ‘repnorsdo "gO ‘Teseu “VN éAreT[IXeUL “KIL {Tewqsoespur Oy] {1vpns pue repns uerpout “4) ¢jequoyy “Yq fonousydsourzsp ‘qSq ‘onossydouusep *Ldd ‘yeAyourlop “AH ‘{Areyuop ‘NAC ‘shes [esaysoryouvsq “Yq AD "SoININS JOUTISIPUL 9}VOIPUT SUIT Po}jOC, “MOTA [e193] UT [[NYs oy} Jo uUoNVIOJsoY “2yspoM sdiyyynzquapy °S “OT ‘UMOYS }0U uoneuenbs ‘adAq Jo uoNes0ysoy “2yspvar sdyyyaizquapy “1 “O1y SSS Ss Vl Zoff 2'70 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Family Palaeoniscidae Genus MENTZICHTHYS nov. Definition: Body fusiform and elongate; principal rays of pectoral fins not articulated till towards their terminations; dorsal and anal fins situated pos- teriorly, moderate in size, triangular in shape, the former originating slightly ahead of the latter; caudal fin heterocercal, inequilobate and deeply cleft, the axial lobe being well developed; distinct fulcra on all fins; head with prominent rostrum and relatively large anteriorly placed orbit with large postorbital; suspensorium very oblique, gape wide, teeth consisting of short well-spaced cutting teeth and fine conical teeth on the maxillary, and numerous fine conical teeth on dentary; opercular large, larger than subopercular, branchiostegal rays fairly numerous, head bones sculptured with striae and tubercles; scales rhombic, of moderate size, with large peg-and-socket articula- tion, entire posteriorly, ridge-scales running from the occiput to the origin of the dorsal and along the leading edge of the caudal fin. Mentzichthys walshi sp. nov. (Figures 1, 2. Plate VI A, B) Specific diagnosis: Slender fusiform fishes whose maximum total length appears to be about 18 cm., the length of the head being contained about four and a half times, and the greatest depth six and a half times in the total length of the body. The Skull The shape and arrangement of the bones of the skull are shown in Figure 2, which has been prepared, allowing for distortion, from three impressions of heads which were cleaned and then polished with a nylon brush before photo- graphing. Plasticine casts were also used for reconstructing the skull, broken lines being used in the final drawing where sutures could not be determined with confidence. The ornament of the frontals, supratemporals, parietals and post-temporals consists of striae running more or less antero-posteriorly. The postrostral is ornamented mostly with tubercles which extend down to the nasals (see Plate VI A). The branchiostegal rays are not ornamented but the large and prominent postorbital bone is markedly rugose. Numerous transverse striae ornament the maxillary and particularly the dentary. The suspensorium is very oblique. The opercular and subopercular are also ornamented, the former being much larger than the latter. The teeth showing on the dentary are minute and numerous, similar teeth appear on the maxillary but there are well spaced short cutting teeth as well which are confined to the anterior and middle section. NEW PALAEONISCID FISH FROM THE WITTEBERG SERIES 271 he Paired Fins _ Preservation is not good enough to detect ornamentation of the supra- eithrum or cleithrum. The pectoral fin, situated low down ventrally, is dium in size with a base length about one third that of the longest lepido- | tri hia. The lepidotrichia, which number about 19 are unarticulated and |unbranched until their distal ends. The anterior edge of the pectoral fin is ered with small fulcra. The pelvic fin, whose origin is about midway een the origin of the pectoral and the origin of the anal, is relatively aall with about 13-15 lepidotrichia which are articulated and distally branched. The anterior edge is covered with small fulcra. * 2 Unpaired Fins g The dorsal fin, which is situated nearer to the caudal fin than to the head, is one and a quarter times as high as the length of the base. It is triangular in shape with from 28-35 lepidotrichia which are articulated and branched ey. The anal fin, whose origin is posterior to that of the dorsal, has a base onger than its height. It is triangular in shape with 35-45 lepidotrichia which a articulated and branched distally. Small fulcra are present along the anterior edge. One of the outstanding features of this new species is the large jal lobe of the caudal fin. This fin is distinctly heterocercal, deeply cleft id inequilobate, the leading edge being covered with ridge scales. _ Squamation Not many scales are available for examination as, in most of the samples, ust the underneath pattern of the squamation appears in the impression. he scales are medium in size and rhombic in shape with pronounced peg- d-socket articulation. The few scales available, mostly immediately posterior e head, show transverse furrows with pits, the posterior edges being rough entire. There are from 16-18 rows of scales from the dorsal to the ventral flace at the point of maximum girth, and 52-58 scales along a lateral series. oderately enlarged ridge-scales, numbering about 21, extend from the ciput to the origin of the dorsal fin. Ridge-scales of a similar size anteriorly tend along the caudal peduncle and up the leading edge of the caudal fin. t faterzal _ The holotype is an impression on a slab No. A.M./64/4562 in the Albany Museum, Grahamstown. A photograph of this is shown in Plate B. This , from two to three inches thick, has numerous impressions on both faces. her samples of importance in constructing the illustrations in Figures 1 and re A.M. 64/4563, A.M. 64/4564 and A.M. 64/4565, in the Albany Museum. her material, S.A.M. Kr169 and S.A.M. Ki170 is preserved in the South African Museum, Cape Town. Pag (e'4 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM DiIscussION Reasonably entire specimens of M. walshi have the following extrem measurements: Total length: 90 mm. Std. length: 70 mm. Total length: 145 mm. Std. length: 110 mm. From these measurements it has been possible to estimate the maximur size of incomplete fossils to be about 180 mm. The type, Figure 1 and Pla B, has a total length of 145 mm. M. walshi belongs to the group pf palaconseids having a very obliqu mandibular suspensorium (Woodward, 1891). The remarkable developmer of the axial caudal lobe, the smaller orbits and the large postorbital bone: distinguish this new genus from Rhadinichthys Traquair, 1877 as re-defined by Moy-Thomas and Dyne (1938). These features, as well as the larger oper= cular, distinguish Mentzichthys from the genus Cycloptychius Young, 1865, as re-defined by the same two authors. Of the known palaeoniscids it woul appear that Mentzichthys is most closely related to those of the Lower Carbonife- 3 rous assigned to the genus Cycloptychius. ‘ | ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Professor Orvar Nybelins of Stockholm, Sweden, for reading this paper in its draft form and for providing valuable comments Dr. H. V. Eales of the Department of Geology, Rhodes University, assisted by his team of senior students, provided the material from which the holotype of i M. walshi was selected. This project, carried out in collaboration with Dr. T. H. Barry, was part of a research programme sponsored by the C.S.1.R., : who also granted funds for the publication of this work. 4 SUMMARY A new palaeoniscid fish Mentzichthys walshi n. gen. et sp. is described from — the Witteberg Series (Lower Carboniferous) of South Africa, just south of Lake Mentz in the eastern Cape. It is suggested that a mass mortality of thesé fishes took place in lacustrine conditions under ice. REFERENCES Du Torr, A. L. 1954. The geology of South Africa. 3rd ed. Edinburgh & London: Oliver & Boyd Haucuton, S. H. 1963. Stratigraphic history of Africa south of the Sahara. Edinburgh & Londo nt Oliver & Boyd. Moy-Tuomas, J. A. & Dynes, M. B. 1938. The actinopterygian fishes from the Lower Carboniferous of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb. 59: 437-480 Rayner, D. H. 1958. The geological environment of fossil fishes. Jn WeEsTOLL, T. S., ed. Studie on fossil vertebrates: 129-156. London: Athlone Press. Woopwarp, A. S. 1891. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). London: British Museum. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII. Plate VI A. Portion of a skull of Mentzichthys walshi, partly obliquely crushed, showing pronounced postorbital bone and ornamentation. B. Holotype of Mentzichthys walshi. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLE or ConTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. X 7 in. (73 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Smiru, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, Fuly 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: _ Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). Sn EO HT en A i ale al ot nh yi j aia OOK LD Ae ee kee Leeks i LW ih oll Ae wiede fue T , ik Vet ei ah i HA LAs | ‘ Ture a , Foe OM An he i re ty iy 7 ay | te bide fw, eee { ‘ ; : NGL J ee Ladies he | ar fibl * 3 iv 7 Ley J i ) z Na s f i) ie | z ’ i oe + a] ¥ ~s, % t q 5 ‘* 5 i ? ue \ 4 * : , Hy : ie A! * ai ) yey > Y ain Ny ‘ i ) § t j E ri i ; ae 7 i r t% s 7 X Fs Dk a { 1 ¢ a ‘i i ‘ % ha bi iif i \ P : i j ‘ ; 7 is: i) ‘ \ ‘ ‘ ‘ f yi ~ t I j c ey : ’ , » 5 a a) 1 ee 4 mY “vi } uy a ty i‘ pti be wt RY ae 864s, o iV MYER 4) FO em. Bisied Pn Poser ge tum Suna rf e vy t Ax eet My ray i is Reib fe nt 7 i PER Aide) med! dia | Wey ices hare Mae hone ; Sr cmb ya rt pun A She pie) = ae Lectin et alan es de spot ba td ey ih 7 9 aa sk q vs te fe aa j , Waly ea araeut nee Sa Peomiieh Seah Tibeh ed NMA Ae € is NR Ra 1 kr HED viebinanee ik fl yet lash * iva TH dey rey rut ‘ aa | Wy ba eee eh he | pin | Sele NONE, aiid antl | etoapepe ah ike ecu ve mi penis si : i AMON triad Do | % t i y iy 4 t f Sheer i ne ’ Lit | i, j j oa i dns f Awd: j ue i t rf iy Ay Daal i ae 6 Vode imuS. COMP, ZOOL EDUARD L. BONE & RONALD SINGER LIERARY, re Ai ™* a SP j tad a heat? S HARVARD HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, UNIVERSITY CAPE PROVINCE AND A REVISION OF THE GENUS IN AFRICA November 1965 November Volume 48 Band Fact) 26 Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(1, 3, 5» 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t.—p.i-), 5(2, 5, 7-9)» 6(1, t.—p.1.), 7(1; 3), 8, 9(1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, t—p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4)- Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel R3.45 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE AND A REVISION OF THE GENUS IN AFRICA! By EpouARD L. BONE B pakiah : Ss. MP. ZOOL: Department of Vertebrate Palaeontology, University of Louvain” MUS, COMP. ZOOL LIERARY, and FEB ¢. 1865 3 RONALD SINGER HARVARD Department of Anatomy, University of Chicago, U.S.A. UNIVERSITY: (With 24 tables, 16 text figures and 13 plates) CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ; : : , : : : ; é : , : 2° 276 General ; : F } : ; : : : é F - 276 The Penerocanves deposits ; : Sa eer : : : 5 : By 2g Localization of the sites . : : ‘ : é ; , : ; Wenner) History of the discoveries : : ; c ; : : : : a7 Geology d : : : ‘ ; : : : - | 270 Faunal assemblage for Langebaanweg, : : : : , as : : . 280 Methods and nomenclature . : 280 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SITES WHERE HIPPARIONIDS HAVE BEEN RECORDED 281 Morocco . 4 : : : : ; ‘ : : i : . - 205 Algeria ; : ; : : : : , . : : : : . |) BOT Tunisia ; ; : d : ; : : ; ; d , 5 . 289 Fayum ‘ é : ; ‘ : : ; ; ‘ : : ; . 282 Ethiopia. ‘ , : : : : ; : ; : : 5 5) 202 Central Africa. ; : : ; : : ; : s : ; eo? East Africa : ; : , : : : : ; , : : 3 283 Uganda d : ; : ‘ : 4 , : ; ; ; =) 208 Kenya ; : 5 ‘ ‘ ; , : : : : : e208) Tanganyika . : : , ‘ : ‘ : ; : : ‘ te 208 South Africa ; ‘ : : : : é : ; : F 2 . 283 Cape Province : : : : : ; A ‘ : : ; - 283 Orange Free State : ‘ ‘ ‘ : b : : : . 208 Transvaal. : : : : 203 SUMMARY OF PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FROM AFRICAN HIPPARIONID SITES . 2 £209 Miocene. ; : : , : ; ; : ; ‘ 5 : WL P2G9 Pliocene : ; ; ; ; 3 ‘ : : ; ; : s so 200 Pleistocene . : : ‘ : : : ; : : : : . 286 North Barca’ : ; : A : : ; : : g : . 286 1 The cost of publication of this paper has been met, in part, by grants from the ‘Fondation Universitaire’ of Belgium, and the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Inc., New York. 2 Present address, Facultés Universitaires, Namur, Belgium. 3 Honorary Curator of Physical Anthropology, South African Museum, Cape Town. 273 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (16), 1965: 273-397, 24 tab., 16 figs., 13 pls. 274 East Africa South Africa . ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM LISTS OF FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGES AT THE AFRICAN HIPPARIONID SITES Individual hipparionid Oued el Akrech sites Oued el Hammam and Niareeeu Ain Hanech Garet Ichkeul Tozeur ; Wadi Natrun Omo Koro Toro Kaiso Kanam. Eyasi Laetolil (South Serengeti Olduvai Vaal River sannep ee Cornelia (Uitzoek) Kromdraai Bolt’s Farm Makapansgat Elandsfontein (Hopefield) Synopsis (Table 1) COMMENTARY ON THE PUBLISHED FAUNAL ASSOCIATIONS AT HIPPARIONID SITES IN AFRICA Miocene Pliocene Pleistocene . North Giles East and Central Africa South Africa . Conclusions based upon the faunal andl foflnee endenee in oe iicetaee CHRONOLOGICAL RANGE Upper limit Lower limit OF Hipparion GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF © Eppa TEETH Upper dentition Lower dentition Summary of the sevaciensnes of Cennanen teeth Upper dentition Lower dentition REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL Description Ectostylid Ptychostylid . Protostylid Hypostylid Entostylid Frequency Ectostylid Ptychostylid . Protostylid Hypostylid ENAMEL ELEMENTS (ee OF THE LOWER TEETH Evolutionary history of ie Soyhids Evolutionary significan Ecological considerations ce of the cones and poids Taxonomy based on stylids REVIEW OF PUBLISHED AFRICAN Hipeaion CRANIAL MATERIAL ~ -~» wet © ees tae ! HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 275 Miocene. : : : ; : : : : W335 Oued el eerie aaa Marceau 5 : ‘ . : : 5 : «| 335 Camp Berteaux . : . : : : : : : : : - 335 Other sites. .. : HY AO Discussion on the ica pheracter ae aenarin eiennin Reordbenr 1959 - 336 Enamel plications . : ; : : ‘ : : : gor Protocone : : 5 ; , : : : : : i BD oe The double knot. : : : : : é : ; : Be eK) Stylids . ‘ ; é : 4 : : : : : é 330 Hypsodonty . : ; ‘ F ‘ : : - : ‘ OBS Eocene . : : : ‘ : : : . 5 : é ac 10) Mascara d : : d : : é d ‘ : ‘ /. 339 St. Arnaud Cemetery : ; : 2 : : : : : . - 339 Ain el Hadj Baba . : : P ‘ : ‘ , ‘ ‘ : - 339 Utique (northern Tunisia) : ; j é . ; : : E | 340 St. Donat oe) : ; : ‘ , : : 5 é ; 340 Pleistocene ‘ : ’ : : ‘ : : f g ‘ - 340 North Afiea - ‘ : ; . , : : : : : 3 e340 Oran. ; ‘ ‘ 2 : , ‘ : : : : ig4o Ain Jourdel . P : : A d , ‘ : : : 2a 4A Beni Foudda : ‘ ; ; : : : : : : Le Ba Wadi Natrun ‘ } : , ‘ ; : , 5 : y egar Central Africa ; ; : : ‘ ; ; : ; : ; -. 342 more Toro . ‘ , : : : : : . : : jb PGE East Africa . : ; : t : ; , , ; d ; ago Oma. ... : ; ; : : : - 342 Olduvai Garkading unpublished eta) : : é : ‘ ‘ - 343 South Serengeti : : 3 ’ : : : ; ; Syhgey! Lake Eyasi_. : ; : j : : . : f : «346 Lake Albert . : 5 , : : ' : ; : ‘ - 346 South Africa . ; : ; ; ; : : : . ; ‘ BE VAS Namaqualand : ; : s ; ; : ; : ; - 346 Christiana : ; , i A ; ‘ BAF Transvaal Pisticlipitheenie cave Mireapind : : , ) ‘ 5 we gag Cornelia (Uitzoek) . , ; : d ’ : : : : 34 Note on Aipparion incisors é : : LORS A SUMMARY OF PUBLISHED POSTCRANIAL REMAINS OF AFRICAN jee 2 P joe Bayi Unpublished data. : : : : : : ; ; - | 352 THE ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS OF Peatusion : : : : : ce Ecological and functional significance of owe ise ; ; : ; ~ 354 Overall dimensions of the skeleton . : : f : : i - 354 Relative dimensions of cheek teeth and incisors . . . ; ‘ : aya The development of the preorbital fossa. y . : : : : - 354. The isolated protocone . : é ; : : : ; s : - 354 Enamel plications . : ; : ' i , ; : ; : i (355 Hypsodonty . : . : ; ; ; ; § : : : - 359 The double knot. : : : ‘ 4 : : : 3 4 . 360 Total tooth structure : : , d i : : ) ; : . 360 Whe extremities < : - 361 The Upper Miocene and Bigistocenc hae Beenie by Afeean fappanio nade : 361 Effects of bionomical conditions on the evolution and the if aaes of Abscat hipparionids ‘ : : 4 Be UNPUBLISHED MATERIAL FROM THE VAAL RIVER DEPOSITS, SOUTH AFRICA. : . 365 Sydney-on-Vaal and Pniel_ . : ; : : : -» 1365 MATERIAL FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE ee SOUTH AFRICA. : A 5 « 307 Description of Hipparion teeth ; : . : ; p : : : ee GOW. Milk dentition : ‘ " ; 2 ; : , ; : gas (o7/ Lower permanent peaution ; ‘ : : i : , ‘ : - 369 276 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM General description ; ; ; ; : ‘ : : ; , - 370 Upper permanent dentition . : ; ; : ; ; ; «. 372 General dimensions (mm) of P22 ‘ : ; : : ; 3 . 472 Description of selected individual teeth ; ; ; : : s) 9949 Appearance of the tooth sectioned just above the cuddle ; ‘ P s+ 3945 Typical features of the upper teeth . ; , , ‘ ; : - 376 Postcranial equid remains : ; j ; , : : i ; . 378 ORIGIN AND DIFFERENTIATION OF AFRICAN HIPPARIONIDS . ; d . 5 . 382 TAXONOMIC STATUS OF THE AFRICAN HIPPARIONIDS . ’ : ; , y x 36% Discussion . : ' F , y , , ; : ; : 7). Soe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. : : , ; ; ; ; ; : A - » 392 SUMMARY . : : : ; , : : 7 ; ; ; : - 393 REFERENCES . ; ; : ; P ; ‘ ; ; ‘ : : -. 393 INTRODUCTION GENERAL The discovery of the genus Hipparion de Christol 1832 in Africa was first mentioned as late as 1878 (Pomel) and then again in 1884 (Thomas), but it was not properly described before 1897 (Pomel). These early papers dealt with specimens found in the Maghreb, North Africa. Additional finds were then made in the Oran and Constantine areas, and, somewhat later, specimens were discovered in Tunisia, in the Nile Valley at Wadi Natrun, in Ethiopia, in the Kaiso Beds of Uganda, and at Cornelia (Uitzoek) in South Africa. The scanty stratigraphical data and faunal associations of these discoveries led to an overmultiplication of genera and species, based mostly on isolated single teeth. Subsequently more complete discoveries and more detailed descriptions were published. In 1937 Hopwood presented some conclusions of the Oldoway Expedition in a monograph on the fossil Equidae. Dietrich (1942) described an important hipparionid! series from South Serengeti, to which Arambourg (1947) added important collections from Omo (Ethiopia). The more extensive material gave rise to a more unified knowledge of the African Hipparion. It enabled Gromova (1952), in her revision of the genus Hipparion, to point out the characteristic features of the African forms, as well as to sketch their general evolutionary and migratory patterns within Africa. The lack of stratigraphical correlations and insufficient knowledge of conditions of exposure and of faunal associations at the various sites where hipparionids have been discovered, only permitted attempts at relative dating of the various sites and their fossil horizons. Furthermore, these sites belong exclusively to Upper Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs. Therefore, it was generally accepted that Hipparion had appeared in America in Pliocene times 1 The term ‘hipparionid’ refers in a general sense to all forms of African tridactyl equidae. Previously Dietrich (1942, p. 94) erected the sub-family ‘Hippariinae’ for the same purpose but without taxonomic definition. Furthermore he also used (1942, p. 94) ‘Hipparion de Christol, 1.w.S.’ in a non-generic sense. As the present authors have come to the conclusion that all African forms belong to a single genus Hipparion, the general term ‘hipparionid’ corresponds to the taxonomic one. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 2g) | and had migrated to Eurasia where the differentiation of the ‘Pontian fauna’ had taken place, and that only subsequently, as late as Pliocene times, Hipparion had reached Africa as a kind of refuge area. This view was still supported less than ten years ago when material was discovered in lacustrine limestone at Mascara (Arambourg, 1956). Recently Hipparion material was discovered in Algeria in undoubted Upper Miocene beds. This led Arambourg (1959) to propose the relationships between the several African hipparionids, and to reduce drastically the former several genera and species to a more sober and unified taxonomy of three different groups, namely H. africanum, H. sitifense and Stylohipparion sp. ‘These formed a chronological succession from the Upper Miocene through the Upper Pliocene to the ‘Villafranchian’ or early Pleistocene times. This classifi- cation was more satisfactory and had definite merits and advantages which will be commented on later in this paper. THE LANGEBAANWEG DEPOSITS Recent discoveries (Singer, 1961) of a fairly extensive series of Hipparion teeth at the Langebaanweg fossil sites, from which Stegolophodon sp. had pre- viously been reported (Singer & Hooijer, 1958), necessitated a thorough study and comparative review of the African hipparionids. The unique and uniform nature of the Langebaanweg material adds materially to our knowledge of the African hipparionids and also provides new evidence for revising the relationships between the several forms already recognized in the literature. Thus the purpose of this paper is twofold: (a) to record a description and diagnosis of the Hzpparion remains from Langebaanweg, and (b) to review and revise the taxonomy of the African hipparionids. Localization of the sites The Langebaanweg fossil sites are situated, like the ‘Elandsfontein’ (Hope- field) site, in the vast Sandveld of the Western Cape, and are located about 75 miles (120 km.) northwest of Cape Town (fig. 1) and 12 miles (19 km.) from the late Middle Pleistocene—early Upper Pleistocene site at ‘Elands- fontein’. The former are 150-200 feet (46-62 metres) above sea-level, while the latter are situated at 300 feet (Singer, 1961). The fossils are mainly located in and around two quarries being commer- cially exploited for phosphates by the African Metals Corporation (AMCOR). ‘The ‘Varswater’ site is situated on the farm ‘Langberg Suid’, and the ‘Baard’s’ site is on the farm ‘Remainder of Langberg’, the two being subdivisions of ‘Langberg’ (fig. 2). Estory-of the discoveries The first hipparionid teeth were recovered from Baard’s Quarry in 1958. In 1961, Mr. Robin Warren, an employee of AMCOR, recovered two excel- 278 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Great pers ie LANGEBAANWEG L SALDANHAg*° 6 NOPE IECe BAY 4 er A Sout bee Elandsfontein © CAPE TOWN English miles Fic. 1. Map indicating the position of Langebaanweg relative to Cape Town. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 279 _lently preserved milk molars at Varswater. Thereafter the remainder of the specimens were found at various sites in the two quarries. Geology The geology of the more than 4 square miles of fossiliferous deposits is not easy to interpret. There is little with which to compare it, as virtually nothing is known of the Quaternary geology of the Cape Province. The surface siliceous sands, possibly aeolian, forms a discontinuous cover of 4 to 5 feet, which may extend to more than 15 feet in a few places. Below this layer, at both quarries, there occurs a Dorcasia-type caliche, discontinuous and stratigraphically above the phosphates. There is also ferricrete, younger than the phosphates and intimately associated with them. | The Dorcasia-type surface limestone also occurs on the solid calcrete dunes at ‘Elandsfontein’, at Saldanha Bay, at False Bay (Singer and Fuller, 1962) and elsewhere. The distribution of the caliche is patchy, and is considerably stripped by erosion. At Varswater the phosphate, a variety of collophane, occurs as the cement- ing material of the consolidated sand, probably as the result of diagenetic replacement of interstitial limes. There are three main layers which vary laterally in thickness within a range of 3 feet to 6 feet. At Baards, the phosphate occurs as nodular to bouldery phoscrete (up to 5 feet thick). The phoscrete is a hard, compact mass of phosphatized sand consisting of sand grains which have been cemented and partially corroded by an amorphous calcium phosphate cement. It overlies the phosphatized nodular sands, sandy clays, and clayey sand. The phoscrete and nodular phosphate sands, represent replacement of older shelly sands by phosphate solutions, the phosphate of which is probably derived from guano. A significant feature is that at Varswater the phosphate has remained unaltered as lime phosphate (Singer & Warren, in preparation). The discovery of shark teeth and other marine forms (vide infra) at the same level as and with the land mammals indicates earlier invasion of the area by the sea. Studies on borehole cores and the presence of shelly sands and gravels suggest the formation of sand bars, especially at Varswater, while the clay and clayey sands at Baard’s indicates a possible lagoonal stasis. Further studies are being carried out in an attempt to clarify the geological genesis and morphology of the region. The major portion of the phosphatic deposits is located at both sites at up to 100 feet above sea-level. The archaic fossils are related to or found just above these deposits. The ‘rolled’ nature of much of the fossil material suggests some transport prior to final deposition. The upper phoscrete and calcrete layers, as well as the clayey deposits, contain the faunal forms represented also at ‘Elandsfontein’ (Ceratotherium, Equus, Sivatherium, Homowoceras and various antelopes), typical of the late Middle Pleistocene—early Upper Pleistocene (“Hopefield Period’). 280 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM On a comparative basis with other sites, it seems likely that the stegolo- phodont—stegodont—archidiskodont complex and the hipparionids derive from a period extending from the Lower Pleistocene to the early Middle Pleistocene. The stegolophodont and stegodont specimens together indicate a very early phase of the Lower Pleistocene. Elsewhere (e.g. at Olduvai) archidiskodont material overlaps this phase and extends up to the Middle Pleistocene. It will be demonstrated below that the hipparionids from Lange- baanweg belong to the same species as that from the lower layers of South Serengeti, so that their presen e is suggestive of the earliest phases of the Pleistocene. FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGE FROM LANGEBAANWEG The following identifications have been made thus far: MOLLUSCA ARTIODACTYLA Trigonephrus sp. Hippopotamus sp. | Stvatherium(*) olduvatense CARNIVORA cf. Oreotragus sp. cf. Arctocephalus cf. Damaliscus sp. Canis sp. cf. Redunca sp. Hyaena brunnea Homotoceras sp. | REPTILIA PROBOSCIDEA Cf lieeiaca Stegolophodon sp. Buide Stegodon sp. Archidiskodon sp. cf. Struthio Palaeoloxodon sp. SELACHII(?) Isurus cf. glaucus PERISSODACTYLA Lamna nasus cf. Ceratotherium Carcharias sp. Eipparion (Hipparion) albertense baardi C’. ferox subsp. nov. Rhinoptera cf. dubia Equus helmer Glopias vulpes (1) According to Arambourg’s recent re-description (1960) of Pomel’s type specimen from St. Charles (Oran), Libytherium maurusium has precedence (see also Singer and Boné, 1960). (?) Identified by Dr. B. Schaeffer, American Museum of Natural History, New York. METHODS AND NOMENCLATURE For the description of the occlusal surfaces of the teeth, the nomenclatures used by Arambourg (1947, 1959), Cooke (1950), and Sondaar (1961) have been modified (see pp. 325-8) and synthesized (figs. 10, IT). The measurements of the teeth have been taken according to the method described by Sondaar (1961). SALDANHA BAY ATLANTIC ~ To LANGE BAAN Vredenburg t=) Varswater quarries % LAGOON SY 4 ss 3s NN XQ quarry C) » y 7 LANGEBAANWEG =/andsfontein SS Principal roads Sx. Railway line _yo— Contours (Elevations in feet; vertical interval 50°) 8 Principal fossil sites Sand dune area on the farm Elandsfontein SCALE 0 1 2 Miles 1 4000 O 4000 2000 3000 4000 Yards becacecens te ed Fic. 2. Contour map showing the location of the quarries at Langebaanweg. oy f umoj| adey ii. fo ees ae t a a ai = Bap tet ejay oes ity = > Tr) > ‘ 4 rw | ay Ee ee . - were Ne ee , "an ae ye ec, my t a nat ht ak = ‘ . . pchgi ie : : : L i ; ¥ ibe i 4 st P . \ = : . ’ q aye 7" 4 4 ee P n 4 7 ye $i . " : ¥ £ ds a y | ‘ - { . . ) w ; - , % ¢ Bi +r a = aly Pe - i ; i se »4 7 € v £. ae 4 é # elit ig — veg at "a ‘ v Pod 4 my 7 ‘ - ; : 4 of Feet oe AF, a 4 ‘> ‘ ' J : Fy ‘yi ; Me Shot af ey ee q ‘ 4 4 ‘ r 4 ? ts ry é cee A i, ' ' a 4 x A & _~wy ee eee ‘oily aiid mo ha. tl mien ay sae abgineamentnmiabiy 7 ® hy 4 sa a A A et eth anes HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 281 The indices devised by the authors are described at appropriate places in the text. The following abbreviations refer to the collections and sites of the source material: Archaeol. Surv. = Archaeological Survey of South Africa, now in the Univer- sity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. B.M.N.H. = British Museum (Natural History) C = Cornelia L = Langebaanweg M.M.K. = McGregor Memorial Museum, Kimberley Nas. Mus. = Nasionale Museum, Bloemfontein Old. = Olduvai S.A.M. = South African Museum, Cape Town w-C: = University of California, Berkeley. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SITES WHERE HIPPARIONIDS HAVE BEEN RECORDED (figs. 3-7) Site Specimen Reference Morocco Camp Berteaux (Gara Ziad) (a) Molar teeth Femur fragment with proximal epiphyses Bourcart, 1937 (6b) Left M? Ennouchi & Jeannette, 1954 Oued el Akrech (near Argoub el Hafid) Ennouchi, 1951 Fouarat (south of Kenitra Choubert, Ennouchi & (Rharb)) Marcais, 1948 ALGERIA Tafna (Guiard, Prov. Oran) Dalloni, 1915 Oued el Hammam Adult skull no. 141 Arambourg, 1959 Adult skull no. 125 Adult skull with dentition no. 116 Juvenile palate with dentition no. 122 Adult mandible no. 143 Adult half mandible no. 89 2 juvenile mandibles with milk teeth nos. 95-96 Several teeth series, juvenile and adult Isolated teeth Humerus, distal fragment no. 159 Radio-ulna no. 123, fragments no. 13, no. 22 and no. 27 Femur: fragment without epiphyses and distal fragment Tibia: distal fragment Pelvic fragment 282 Site Oued el Hammam (cont.) Marceau Mascara St. Donat St. Arnaud (Cemetery) Ain el Hadj Baba Ain el Bey Mansourah Setif Beni Foudda (Ain Boucherit) Ain Hanech Oran (Puits Kharouby) Ain Jourdel TUNISIA Garet Ichkeul Tozeur Beds Utique Djebel M’dilla FAYUM Wadi Natrun, Gart el Moluk Hill ETHIOPIA Omo Valley CENTRAL AFRICA Tchad, Koro Toro region Goz-Kerki Koula Bochianga Quadi Derdeney Koula Ri Katir (It is not clear at which of these five sites Stylo- hipparion has been found) ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Specimen Astralagus, 2 Calcaneum, 1 Numerous complete metapodials (5 Mc III, 5 Mt III), many (6) of them with lateral digits P4 and Ma, P, Skull fragments of one individual: palate with nearly complete left dental series, and half right den- tal series; symphysis with incisors “Teeth of two jaws’ (a) upper molars (b) lower molars Metapodials with developed lateral digits Upper teeth: right P4*-M? left M? ’ Lower teeth Ma, left P; or Py, Ma M;, P Left upper P (P* ?) (a) 1 incisor, 5 M,, 1 M@ (brought back by Brumpt from the du Bourg de Bozas Mission, 1903) (6) right P? no. 396 left M? no. 395 left M@ fragment no. 370 right M, or M, no. 3 & no. 4 right humerus fragment Reference Arambourg, 1959 Arambourg, 1956 Joleaud, 1936 Arambourg, 1956 Pomel, 1897 Arambourg, 1956 Thomas, 1884 Thomas, 1884 Thomas, 1884 Thomas, 1884 Pomel, 1897 Arambourg, 1949 Pomel, 1897 Thomas, 1884 Arambourg, 1949 Roman & _ Solignac, 1931 Solignac, 1927 Solignac, 1927 Andrews, 1902 Haug, 1911; Joleaud, 1933 Arambourg, 1947 Coppens, 1960 HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE Site EAST AFRICA Uganda: East shore of Lake Albert in Kaiso layers Kenya: Kanam lower beds. Kanjera Tanganyika: North-east shore of Lake Eyasi (W. and N. of Mumba Hill) South Serengeti (various loca- lities) Olduvai SOUTH AFRICA Cape Province: (i) Namaqualand (40 mi. east of Springbok) Sydney-on-Vaal Pniel, near Barkly West (c) Vaal River at Chris- tiana Orange Free State: Cornelia (Uitzoek) (ii) (a) (0) Transvaal: Kromdraai Cave Bolt’s Farm ? Makapansgat Specimen I incomplete upper molar BM Mr12615 Teeth Loose teeth, fragmented mandibles Left P,-M, and M, Right P,, M,, M, and part of M; (above specimens are S.A.M. 9982) Left M? (MMK 431) Left P+ or M, (MMK 5225) Left M? or M? (Arch. Surv. 113) (a) right M? (or M?) (Nas. Mus. C558) left M® (Nas. Mus. C555) left M, + M, (Nas. Mus. C556) (6) symphysial fragment and in- cisors (c) right M, (Nas. Mus. C797) left P, (Nas. Mus. C796) (d) left P,-M, (Nas. Mus. C795) 2 lower teeth (discovered by Broom) NOTE: M? indicates upper molar; M, lower molar, etc. 283 Reference Hopwood, 1926 Reck & Kohl-Larsen, 1936 Dietrich, 1942 Hopwood, 1929, 1937 Haughton, 1932 Cooke, 1950 Van Hoepen, 1930 Van Hoepen, 1930 Van Hoepen, 1932 Van Hoepen, 1932 Cooke, 1950 Cooke, 1963 Cooke, 1963 SUMMARY OF PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FROM AFRICAN HIPPARIONID SITES The present state of our knowledge of the geological evidence from sites in Africa where hipparionids have been discovered indicates that they first appeared in Upper Miocene deposits. A summary of the data is considered useful for the assessment of the status of the Langebaanweg material. MIOCENE The continental layers of vertebrate fossils at OUED EL HAMMAM (between Mascara and Mercier Lacombe, upstream from Bou Hanifia, 284 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fic. 3. Map of Africa indicating major areas of discovery of hipparionids. Details of areas A-C are shown in figs. 4-6, while area D is enlarged in fig. 1. Algeria—figs. 3, 4) occur between two marine horizons, namely, (1) a Burdi- galian one, characterized by its mollusc and echinid fauna and (2) an Upper Miocene Lithotamnium limestone. On this stratigraphical basis, the Hipparion horizon has been dated as Tortonian, i.e. Upper Vindobonian (Late Miocene) immediately antedating the Tortono-Sahelian transgression which occurs at the end of the Miocene marine period in this area (Arambourg, 1959). The MARCEAU deposit, and especially its lignite and lacustrine clay and limestone which yield the Hipparion specimens, are referred to a period anterior to the Pliocene transgression, i.e. they belong to the Upper Miocene and may be equated with Oued el Hammam (Flandrin, 1942). ee ees en ee ee a ee Tg ee ee ee ae es a i ee ee 285 HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE ‘onbiyp) °0% fynoyYyoy yore “61 SepyIq IW [eqel[a “gi fanezoy, “41 : VISINO J, ‘eqeg [pez] fo ury ‘gi {Aogq Jo ury pure jopinof ury “GI fnvooreyy “V1 £yeu0Gg “1g °S1 fpneuIY 3g ‘SI SYyouRPY ULY “11 feppnog IUag pue wW1oyonog ury ‘or {yn9gg °6 ‘yemnosuepy “g eavosepy “LZ Seuyey -g SureuUIeZY [2 pone ‘SG ‘(uvIO) Aqnoieyy s}ing ‘P S(uvIO) sapaeyD 3g °€ > VINAOT “xnvoylog durey °c fyeqey “1 - : ODDOAOJY ‘AjauIeU “paqiiosap useq sey uoundgizy YOIYM WIOIJ saty[TeIO] Vy} Sunvorpur (6 “sy uly) qoryseypy oy} Jo dep “Pv -o1g 286 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM There is good evidence that CAMP BERTEAUX (near Taourirt, Eastern Morocco) belongs to this period. The Hipparion layers, from which Mastodon cf. angustidens has been recovered (Bourcart, 1937), form the base of a lacustrine series of ‘argiles smectiques’ which are lying on marine horizons with Tortonian fauna and are covered with Pontian deposits. Choubert and Ennouchi (1946) have dated the Hipparion layers as Upper Tortonian, being a sub-continental phase at the end of the Miocene period. Thus, they are somewhat younger than those from Oued el Hammam (Arambourg, 1959). The brack water deposits of TAFNA (near Guiard, Province of Oran) show a ‘Sarmatian facies’ of the Upper Vindobonian. On faunal and litho- logical grounds, they were first referred to the ‘classical Pontian’ (Dalloni, 1914), but recently they were re-studied and correlated with the Oued el Hammam horizon (Perrodon and Tempere, 1953). However, the geological evidence is not clear. PLIOCENE Pliocene palaeontological sites are rare in the Maghreb. Some fossiliferous lacustrine formations in the SETIF-CONSTANTINE area have been referred to this period (Middle Pliocene). Included are also the limestone deposits of the ST. ARNAUD Cemetery and of the MASCARA region, AIN EL BEY, AIN EL HADJ BABA, ST. DONAT, and possibly UTIQUE in Tunisia. Most of these exposures correspond to the fluviolacustrine filling of a vast depression between the Tellian and Sahara—Atlas. According to Arambourg (1956) the Aipparion sitifense layers of St. Arnaud Cemetery, Ain el Hadj Baba and Mascara are lithologically different (sands and lacustrine limestones) from the Stylohipparion and Equus numidicus deposits of Ain Boucherit and Ain Jourdel (gray marls and red conglomerate). While these represent the base of the ‘Villafranchian’ (similar to Lac Ichkeul and Fouarat), they are referred — to the Middle Pliocene. No satisfactory geological evidence is available for TOZEUR (Tunisia): it was referred by Boule (1910) and Solignac (1931) to the ‘Pontian’ stage because of the presence of Merycopotamus and Hipparion. Now that the occurrence of these forms is known in Upper Miocene deposits in India and North Africa, there is a special need for obtaining better stratigraphical evidence for dating this site. At WADI NATRUN (Gart el Moluk Hill) in the Nile Valley, fluvio- marine gypsiferous clays (containing, among other rare vertebrates, Hipparion albertense) are interbedded with limestones and shales, and deposited in an arm of the Mediterranean in the Nile Valley. On a stratigraphical basis they are dated as Middle Pliocene. PLEISTOCENE North Africa The Hipparion fossiliferous horizons in the Maghreb correspond strati- graphically to the marine regression following the major Pliocene extension. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 287 The most significant exposures are St. Arnaud and Oran in Algeria, and Lac Ichkeul, near Bizerta, in Tunisia (figs. 3, 4). ‘The sequence has been extensively described and discussed (Howell, 1959). The general feature is that of a 300-foot series of marls and lacustrine clays and silts, with interbedded fossiliferous sandstones, gravels and calcareous conglomerates. At LAC ICHKEUL the base is formed by deep-water Plaisancian and lagoonal Astian marine deposits capped with fresh-water beds from the early Pleistocene, with intercalation of a one-foot thick conglomerate. At BEL HACEL eroded dune sandstones overlying transgressive Astian marls and sands are bearing the ‘Villafranchian’ fauna: they are further overlain by the 100-metre high Sicilian beach. In the ST. ARNAUD area, two distinct fossiliferous horizons are visible. The lower one (Ain Boucherit, i.e. Beni Foudda) is a coarse calcareous conglo- merate; the upper one (Ain Hanech) is a cracked, rather sandy or gravelly clay, intercalated in the thick mar] filling the old marshy or lacustrine depres- sion. Faunal and stratigraphical considerations make the St. Arnaud upper deposit somewhat younger than Lac Ichkeul. At ORAN (ST. CHARLES), where Libyhipparion (?) libycum was first recovered and named by Pomel (1897), the consolidated dune sandstones and clays are concordantly overlying the calabrian sandstones, of which they represent the regression facies. The calabrian itself is in direct contact with the Flabellipecten flabelliformis sands and sandstones of the marine Pliocene; and at the base, the sequence reaches the Tortono-Sahelian marks and red stone of the Upper Miocene (Arambourg, 1960). Ligniferous clays of the PUITS KHAROUBY near Oran from which H. massoesylium Pomel was recovered, has usually been placed—on the basis of its mollusc fauna—in the Upper Pliocene, but there is little geological _ evidence for it being older than Lower Pleistocene. East Africa Most of the fossiliferous horizons of East Africa (figs. 3, 5) are linked with tuffs, ashes or lapilli projected and deposited by volcanic eruptions. This volcanic activity spans over a long period of time, probably from Lower Miocene up to Upper Pleistocene and even to historical times. Therefore it is difficult, on purely geological grounds, to date the different fossil deposits. Usually it is only by convergence of tectonic, stratigraphical, lithological and chemical methods on the one hand, and by faunal studies on the other that it is possible to propose a satisfactory date. At KANAM, on the slope of the dissected volcanic centre of Homa - Mountain, the lacustrine brown calcareous fossiliferous clays, with their interbedded fine tuffs from intermittent volcanic explosions, are commonly referred to the Lower Pleistocene. The KAISO series is complex. It has been repeatedly studied (Wayland, 1926; Fuchs, 1934), and recently Lepersonne (1949) subdivided it into three 288 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM A dl Po victoria @ Lake Kivu ; A é sath, B A] Pree x has been described, namely, 1. Lake Albert; 2. Kanjera; 3. Mumba Hills, Lake Eyasi; 4. Olduvai | : : | : 4 % “Zs AS. SS SS M7 ” 250 Fic. 5. Map of Central-East Africa (B in fig. 3) indicating the localities from which Hipparion : Gorge; 5. South Serengeti, Laetolil beds. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 289 main stages of sedimentation, the middle one being highly fossiliferous. It is a clayey deposit, alternating with thin beds of fine sands and sandstones, and discontinuous ironstone horizons and limonite lenses (Kaiso bone beds), containing silicified wood and a high proportion of vertebrates. It overlies a silty lower deposit with some minor gravel horizons, resting on a basal ironstone layer (laterite) capped by unstratified sands above the down-faulted peneplain surface. This lower part of the Kaiso series, including the fossil horizon, is usually placed in the Lower Pleistocene (Howell, 1959; Bishop, 1963). The OMO beds are lithographically comparable to the Kaiso deposits. The ‘Villafranchian’ fauna, and the Hipparion material in particular, occur in sandstone horizons between lacustrine volcanic clayey tuffs. In the evolution of the Rudolph depression in its Nilotic or open phase, Arambourg (1943) has distinguished two major extensions of the lake during the Pleistocene: (1) the vertebrate beds occur in a sand and sandstone horizon of the lower Omo Valley, representing a first phase of lacustrine deposition prior to the general tectonic uplift of the end of the Lower Pleistocene. (2) Posterior to the tectonic dislocation, the second phase corresponds to the series of horizontal terraces on the slope of the Rudolph Basin—they are not fossiliferous. This distinction, confirmed by the study of the fauna, permits the fossil beds to be dated as Lower Pleistocene, probably younger than Kaiso and Kanam. It is more difficult to specify the geological location of the SERENGETI Hipparion material. The Laetolil beds in the Vogel River area show a sequence of upfaulted subaerially deposited yellow and gray tuffs (Kent, 1941). Unfor- tunately the fauna collected by Kohl-Larsen ‘in den Schluchten und Wasser- rissen’ of the South Serengeti was probably recovered from various horizons which were altered and mixed-up by subsequent erosion (Dietrich, 1942). The gray tuffs, about 20 m. thick, which appear to contain the ‘older fauna’ (Kohl- Larsen, 1939), are dated as Lower Pleistocene, more or less contemporary with Omo and Olduvai I. Efforts have been made to identify this stratigraphic- ally older fauna by such means as the type of mineralization and colour. Conclusions based on this method can only be accepted with reserve because of the fact that possible weathering may have altered the original appearance of the fossils. Nevertheless, Dietrich (1942) believed that all his Hypsohipparion material derived from the lower gray tufts. The vast sequence of stratified beds exposed in the OLDUVAI GORGE (northern Tanganyika) has been extensively discussed in recent years, and lately by Pickering (1960) and Leakey (1963). Independently of the chemical dating of the beds, which provides evidence of a great duration and antiquity of Bed I, dating has also been attempted on studies of the fauna- and on a climatological basis. Little has been added from the strictly geological point of view. It is important to note that the major climatic, geological and appar- ently faunal ‘break’ occurs near the base of Bed II and not, as was previously thought, between Beds I and II. Most workers agree that Olduvai I belongs to the Lower Pleistocene, being more or less contemporary with (and probably ce ' 290 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM prior to) Omo and Laetolil, while Beds II, III, IV are considered to belong to the Middle Pleistocene. The KANJERA exposures, on the low cliffs of the Homa Mountain close to Lake Victoria, consist of a tripartite series of basal greenish ash and tuffs, succeeded by clays with limestone and by upper transgressive beds of brown- greenish clay. Most of the fossils are obtained from and in close association with the lower tuff and ash layer, but it is not possible to be certain whether or not all the material came from this source (Kent, 1942). However, there is sufficient evidence that the Hipparion may be considered to be more ancient than the human fossil remains which were recovered from the middle beds. The Kanjera faunal beds are referred to the Middle Pleistocene, roughly contemporary with Olduvai IV. The LAKE EYASI beds are usually referred to an early Upper Pleistocene period, more on a palaeontological than on a geological basis. According to Reck and Kohl-Larsen (1936), it is probable that the Hipparion teeth recovered west and north of Mumba Hill, in the north-east section of the Eyasi basin (see p. 283), do not belong to the original beds. Indeed they are very much rolled, which is not the case for the presumably contem- © poraneous material, and constitute a secondary deposition. If this interpretation : is correct, these teeth are probably more ancient than the typical Eyasi fauna, and should be dated to a period prior to the Upper Pleistocene. South Africa The only relatively satisfactory stratigraphical information concerning HMipparion in South Africa is obtained at the YOUNGER GRAVELS OF THE CHRISTIANA z= Sy dney- . on-Vaal Pniel Estates Sca/e in miles ZKIMBERLEY Fic. 6. Map of northern Cape Province, South Africa (C in fig. 3) indicating localities from M which Hipparion has been described, namely, Sydney-on-Vaal, Pniel and Christiana. — elie! 5 ss let En NS ‘sinqssuuvyof = [ fueqing = q ‘uloyU0sWIO[g = g :UMOYsS IIe SoT}ID 9914} jo suontsod oy], 6 “sy Jo G pu 1) seore 0} UOT}EIOI UT ‘spruoTIeddry jo AIJAODSIP Jo SoT}I[VoO] UIeJIIN SuNLoIpUl volIFY YINoG Jo depy ‘4 ‘o1g 291 QOE OS¢ 002 OSI OO! OS oy yoqbulids « P1]aUJOe WJP4 S.))0G~6 yeBsuedeyey « HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE terre terranes ~ — as 292 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM VAAL RIVER (Christiana; Pniel; Sydney-on-Vaal: fig. 6). In this horizon, which actually presents the first fossil occurrence in the Vaal area (as fossils of the oldest gravels have probably been destroyed), three phases have been recognized from their elevation and their stone artefact associations. However, most of the fossils seem to have derived from Phase II and III, although it is not impossible that the fossils found below Barkly West may have been contained in Phase I of the Younger Gravels (Cooke, 1963). On the basis of a climatologi- cal interpretation (Séhnge, Visser and Lowe, 1937; amended by Cooke, 1947, and Lowe, 1952), the Younger Gravels were correlated with the Middle Pleistocene Olduvai Beds II and IV. The CORNELIA beds, an open site on the fous ‘Uitzoek’ in the Orange Free State, consists of exposures of clays, gravels and sand, which represent an old ‘pan’ filling. Oakley (1954) emphasizes the Pleistocene nature of the site by referring to a ‘lower Fauresmith industry’ from the beds. There is no reliable date based purely on stratigraphy for this site. At present it is also impossible to make any tentative geological dating for the Notohipparion material from NAMAQUALAND. It was recovered from a granite level in a well, 60 feet down in the surface limestone, 40 miles east of | Springbok. It is known that the infilling of the valleys with sand has been occurring in Namaqualand from Upper Cretaceous times, with probable breaks in the sedimentation, but there is no information on the actual sequence of gravels and limestone in the well (Haughton, 1932). The Hipparion occurrence in cave fillings at KROMDRAAT, (?) MAKA- — PANSGAT and BOLT’S FARM has been dated by faunal and climatological methods (Ewer, 1957; Brain, 1958), and nothing further can be added from a purely stratigraphical point of view. LISTS OF FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGES AT THE AFRICAN HIPPARIONID SITES It is considered useful to include lists of all the diagnosed, published fauna from the various sites where Hipparion has been recovered. Omission of particular sites is due to lack of information, and Hopefield is included because of the richness of fauna and for comparison with contemporaneous sites. The faunal assemblage of Langebaanweg is listed on page 280. The sites are listed according to the order presented on pages 281-3. Wherever possible, generic and specific — names are retained as they appear in the publications quoted. INDIVIDUAL HIPPARIONID SITES Oued el Akrech (Morocco) (After Arambourg and Choubert, 1957) PROBOSCIDEA PERISSODACTYLA +Anancus osiris +Stylohipparion sp. +Elephas africanavus HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 2903 Oued el Hammam (Oran) and Marceau (Algiers) (After Arambourg, 1963) PRIMATES + Macaca flandrin RODENTIA + Hystrix sp. CARNIVORA + Hyaena algeriensis TUBULIDENTATA + Orycteropus mauritanicus PROBOSCIDEA + Turicius sp. + Mastodon sp. PERISSODACTYLA {Dicerorhinus primaevus +Hipparion africanum ARTIODACTYLA +Palaeotragus germaini +Samotherium sp. {Damalavus boroccor tGazella praegaudryt + Tragocerus sp. +Cephalophus sp. AVES {Struthio sp. Ain Hanech (Algeria) (After Arambourg, 1947; 1949) CARNIVORA Hyaena sp. Canis sp. PROBOSCIDEA + Anancus osiris tElephas cf. planifrons +E. aff. meridionalis or recki PERISSODACTYLA tAltelodus aff. sumus tStylohipparion libycum Equus sp. (4) According to Leakey, 1958= Mesochoerus. ARTIODACTYLA Hippopotamus amphibius + Omochoerus(*) sp. Giraffa sp. tLibythertum maurusium Bos sp. {Bubalus sp. Oryx sp. Alcelaphus sp. +tGazella sitifensis Garet Ichkeul (Tunisia) (After Arambourg, 1949) PROBOSCIDEA tAnancus osiris tElephas cf. planifrons PERISSODACTYLA tAtelodus aff. simus {Stylohipparion libycum Equus ARTIODACTYLA Hippopotamus sp. +Libytherium maurusium Bos sp. Oryx sp. Alcelaphus sp. tGazella aff. sitifensis Redunca sp. Tozeur (Tunisia) (After Roman & Solignac, 1934) PROBOSCIDEA {Mastodon cf. longirostris PERISSODACTYLA +Hipparion sp. 294 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ARTIODACTYLA + Tragocerus amaltheus + Merycopotamus aff. dissimilis +Hemitragus perimensis +Capreolus matheron Antilopinae Wadi Natrun (After Studer, 1898; Andrews, 1902; Arambourg, 1947 and 1963) MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA + Hippopotamus protamphibius + Stvachoerus giganteus Camelidae gen. sp. indet. PRIMATES +Libypithecus markgraft CARNIVORA tLibythertum maurusium +Machairodontidae gen. sp. indet. + Hippotragus (?) cordieri Phocidae gen. sp. indet. REPTILIA Lutra sp. : Crocodilus | HN: Oliaaih + Euthecodon nitriae i ? Leporidae + Sternothaerus dewitzinanus 4 PROBOSCIDEA + Trionyx pliocaenicus : + Mastodon sp. PISCES ‘ PERISSODACTYLA Protopterus $ +Hipparion sp. Synodontis : Omo (After Arambourg, 1947) PRIMATES tNotochoerus capensis (*) + Dinopithecus brumpt +Phacochoerus africanus fossilis(*) CARNIVORA Giraffa camelopardalis +Homotherium (?) ethiopicum t Giraffa gracilis q PROBOSCIDEA {Sivatherium olduvaiense(*) | Deinotherium bozasi i Manors Dries sigh. + Elephas (Archidiskodon) recki Hobus, (hobus) appears + BlPhie | deceoden) ch een + Redunca ancystrocera PERISSODACTYLA Alcelaphus sp. : P tAtelodus cf. germano-africanus + Strepsiceros imberbis ; + Stylohtpparion albertense Aepyceros melampus ; Equus cf. zebra Antidorcas sp. q ARTIODACTYLA Oryx cf. gazella } +Hippopotamus (Tetraprotodon) prot- Tragelaphus nakuae vy amphibius Taurotragus cf. procanna | +t Omochoerus heseloni(*) Gazella praethomsoni + Metridiochoerus andrewsi(*) Syncerus aff. brachyceros 4 (1)= Mesochoerus heseloni (Leakey, 1958). (?) = Pronotochoerus jacksoni (Leakey, 1958). (3) = Notochoerus euilus (Leakey, 1958). (*) According to Leakey, 1958= Tapinochoerus meadowsi, but does not belong to the Omo Beds. (5) See footnote to Langebaanweg fauna (p. 280). HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 295 Koro Toro (Tchad) (After Abadie, Barbeau and Coppens, 1949; Coppens, 1960) MAMMALIA PERISSODACTYLA PRIMATES + Stylohipparion sp. ; Ceratotherium si }‘Australopithecus’ sp. lie ARTIODACTYLA + Hippopotamus cf. protamphibius + Sivatherium(*) sp. CARNIVORA Hyaena cf. striata ee CIDE! Giraffa camelopardalis tArchidiskodon africanavus(*) Alcelaphus sp. tA. recki(?) tAnancus sp. REPTILIA +Stegodon sp. Crocodilus niloticus 1) According to Cooke, 1960= Elephas africanavus. g (?) According to Cooke, 1960= Palaeoloxodon recki. (*) See footnote to Langebaanweg fauna (p. 280). Kaiso! CARNIVORA + Metaschizotherium hennigi +? Homotherium ethiopicum Ceratotherium simum PROBOSCIDEA ARTIODACTYLA + Stegodon kaisensis tArchidiskodon exoptatus tHippopotamus imaguncula +H. protamphibius PERISSODACTYLA + Notochoerus euilus + Stylohipparion albertense + Mesochoerus limnetes Kanam! CARNIVORA PERISSODACTYLA Crocuta crocuta + Stylohipparion albertense + Equus oldowayensis Ceratotherium simum Diceros bicornis PROBOSCIDEA ARTIODACTYLA tAnancus kenyensis + Hippopotamus imaguncula +Stegodon kaisensis + Metridiochoerus pygmaeus tArchidiskodon subplanifrons +. Nyanzachoerus kanamensis TA. exoptatus Giraffa camelopardalis +Deinotherium bozasi +Libytherium olduvatense 1 Compiled from Hopwood, Leakey & McInnes in Leakey, 1951; Dietrich, 1950; McInnes, 1953; Cooke, 1963; Leakey, 1958. 296 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Eyasi! PRIMATES Homo sp. RODENTIA +Pedetes surdaster Thryonomys swinderianus CARNIVORA Crocuta crocuta Caracal caracal Panthera leo Panthera pardus TUBULIDENTATA + Orycteropus aethiopicus PERISSODACTYLA Equus burchelli + Stylohipparion sp. Diceros bicornis Laetolil (South Serengeti)? PRIMATES + Simopithecus oswaldi RODENTIA +Pedetes surdaster +Hystrix galeata CARNIVORA Canis mesomelas C. mesomelas latirostris +Canis africanus Crocuta crocuta Caracal caracal ? Panthera pardus TUBULIDENTATA + Orycteropus aethiopicus PROBOSCIDEA tAnancus kenyensis tArchidiskodon subplanifrons tA. exoptatus tA. recki + Deinotherium bozasi 1 See footnote p. 295. ARTIODACTYLA Hippopotamus amphibius Potamochoerus kowropotamus Giraffa camelopardalis Strepsiceros strepsiceros Taurotragus oryx Syncerus caffer +Homotoceras nilsoni Kobus ellipsirymnus + Adenota kob }Redunca redunca Pelea sp. t Oryx beisa Aepyceros melampus +tGazella granti PERISSODACTYLA + Stylohipparion albertense Equus burchelli + Metaschizothertium hennigi Ceratothertum simum + Serengeticeros efficax ARTIODACTYLA Hippopotamus amphibius +. Notochoerus euilus + Okapia stillea Giraffa camelopardalis +Libytherium olduvaiense + Tragelaphus buxtoni Taurotragus oryx Syncerus caffer ? Kobus ellipsirymnus +Redunca redunca + Hippotragus equinus +Damaliscus angusticornis Aepyceros melampus } a, epaceglic ay neh Sa et HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 297 Olduvai (After Leakey, 1958, and Cooke, 1963) Numbers I, II, III and IV refer to the various beds PRIMATES + Simopithecus oswaldi (1, II, III, IV) +S. jonathani (II, ? IV) +Paranthropus boiser (1, IT) +Homo sp. (1, 11) CARNIVORA Canis mesomelas (II, IV) C. mesomelas latirostris (II, IV) +Canis africanus (II, IV) Aonyx capensis (11) Crocuta crocuta (1) Panthera leo (II, I11) P. pardus (? I) PROBOSCIDEA tAnancus kenyensis (1, 11) + Archidiskodon exoptatus (1) ta. reo (1, Tf, III, TV) + Deinotherium bozasi (I, II) PERISSODACTYLA +Stylohipparion albertense (I, II, III, IV) Equus burchelli (11, 111, TV) TE. aff. grevy: (I, II, III, IV) TE. oldowayensis (1, II, III, IV) +Metaschizotherium hennigi (1, I1) Ceratotherium simum (I, II, II, IV) tSerengeticeros efficax (II) Diceros bicornis (1, II, III, IV) ARTIODACTYLA tHippopotamus gorgops (1, II, III, IV) + Notochoerus hopwood: (III, IV) +N. compactus (11) + Mesochoerus olduvaiensis (1, II, III, IV) | +Potamochoerus majus (1, II, III, IV) Phacochoerus africanus (II, III, IV) +P. altidens altidens (11, III, IV) +P. altidens robustus (I, IT) + Tapinochoerus minutus (IV) +T. meadows: (I, II, III, IV) tAfrochoerus nicoli (II, III, IV) + Metridiochoerus andrews: (1) Orthostyonyx brachiops (11) + Okapia stiller (? 1) Guiraffa camelopardalis (II, 1V) +G. gracilis (11) tLibytherium olduvaiense (1, II, III, IV) Strepsiceros strepsiceros (? I, II, IV) tStrepsiceros imberbis (? I, II, IV) + Tragelaphus buxtont (11) Taurotragus oryx (1, II, IV) + Homoioceras nilssoni (IV) +Bularchus arok (11, III, IV) +Adenota kob (I, II, 111) +Hippotragus equinus (III, IV) +H. nro (II, IV) t Oryx beisa (1) + Damaliscus angusticornis (II, IV) +D. teste (I, II, IV) + Alcelaphus kattwinkelt (II, III, IV) +Beatragus huntert (1, II, IV) +Gorgon taurinus semiticus (I, II, III, IV) {Gazella gazella praecursor (1, II, IV) +G. granti (I, II, TV) +Phenacotragus recki (1V) | Pultiphagonides africanus (1, IT) +Pelorovis oldowayensis (II, IV) Vaal River Younger Gravels (After Cooke and Wells, 1946; Cooke, 1949, 1963; Wells, 1964) CARNIVORA cf. Crocuta crocuta 3 PROBOSCIDEA +Gomphotherium sp. 298 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM +*Archidiskodon’ subplanifrons +Stylochoerus compactus +‘Archidiskodon’ broomi +Phacochoerus aethiopicus +*Archidiskodon’ transvaalensis Phacochoerus africanus +‘Palaeoloxodon archidiskodontoides’ Hippopotamus cf. amphibius Ca Terrecktian) + Stvatherium (?) cingulatum(?*) t‘Loxodonta’ cf. atlantica + Stvatherium olduvatense haughtoni(*) cf. Loxodonta africana cf. Alcelaphus caama PERISSODACTYLA +‘Alcelaphus robustus’ tcf. Megalotragus eucornutus Connochaetes cf. gnou cf. Connochaetes sp. cf. Damaliscus sp. cf. Sylvicapra grimmia cf. Aepyceros melampus cf. Antidorcas marsupialis tGazella wellsi +Stylohipparion steytleri + Equus helmet tEquus plicatus +‘Equus sandwith’ (=E. plicatus ?) Equus cf. burchelli Equus cf. quagga cf. Diceros bicornis ARTIODACTYLA cf. Hippotragus sp. + Mesochoerus paiceae cf. Strepsiceros strepsiceros + Notochoerus capensis Taurotragus cf. oryx + Tapinochoerus modestus Syncerus cf. caffer +* Tapinochoerus’ meadowst +*‘Homotoceras’ cf. baini (4) See footnote to Langebaanweg fauna (p. 280). Cornelia (Uitzoek) (After Cooke, 1963) PERISSODACTYLA T aurotragus Oryx +Stylohipparion steytlert +‘Homoioceras’ baini Equus burchelli + Kobus venterae +E. plicatus Damaliscus cf. albifrons + Eurygnathohippus cornelranus +Damaliscus sp. ARTIODACTYLA Alcelaphus caama +? A. helmet ao P | anus ene ink : +tConnochaetes laticornutus as ae ids | Megalotragus eucornutus Phacochoerus africanus i Gnhaioiens +tGazella wells Bi ee +G. helmoedi Giraffa camelopardalis tLibytherium olduvaiense Strepsiceros strepsiceros +Gazella sp. + Antidorcas marsupialis Kromdraai (After Cooke, 1963) INSECTIVORA Crocidura cf. bicolor +Proamblysomus antiquus Suncus cf. etruscus + Elephantulus langi +? Myosorex robinsont tO i i HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 299 PRIMATES + Parapapio jonest +Papio robinsont +Paranthropus robustus LAGOMORPHA Lepus capensis RODENTIA + Mystromys antiquus Tatera cf. brantsi ?Desmodillus auricularis Grammomys cf. dolichurus +Rhabdomys cf. pumilio Mastomys cf. natalensis Malacothrix cf. typica Steatomys cf. pratensis +Palaeotomys gracilis tCryptomys roberisi CARNIVORA Canis mesomelas pappos {Canis atrox +Canis terblanchet Vulpes pulcher Bolt’s Farm (After Cooke, 1963) INSECTIVORA +Proamblysomus antiquus tAtelerix major - tElephantulus langi {Elephantulus antiquus E. cf. brachyrhynchus Suncus cf. etruscus {| Myosorex robinson CHIROPTERA Rhinolophus cf. capensis tcf. Myotis sp. PRIMATES + ?Parapapio broom 1? P. whiter tCercopithecoides williamsi RODENTIA Pedetes cf. caffer + Herpestes mesotes tCrossarchus transvaalensis tCrocuta spelaea tC. ultra +Hyaena bellax +Felix crassidens + Therailurus piveteaur +Panthera aff. leo t? P. whiter TP. shaw + Megantereon eurynodon HYDRACOIDEA +Procavia antiqua +P. transvaalensis PERISSODACTYLA +Stylohipparion steytlera ? Equus burchelli TE. plicatus TE. helmet ARTIODACTYLA +Potamochoerops antiquus +Mystromys hausleitneri Tatera cf. brantst +Dasymys bolti +Rhabdomys cf. pumilio + Thallomys debruyna Leggada cf. minutoides L. cf. major Malacothrix cf. typica +Palaeotomys gracilis Hystrix africae-australis tCryptomys robertsi CARNIVORA Canis mesomelas C’. mesomelas pappos Aonyx cf. capensis Suricata suricatta +Crossarchus transvaalensis +Hyaena bellax +Leptailurus spelaeus 300 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM + Therailurus barlowi +Panthera aff. leo + Machairodus transvaalensis PROBOSCIDEA +Loxodonta atlantica HYDRACOIDEA Procavia capensis PERISSODACTYLA +Stylohipparion steytlert Equus burchellii TE. plicatus ARTIODACTYLA + Tapinochoerus meadowsi Makapansgat (After Cooke, 1963) INSECTIVORA tChrysotricha hamilton | Elephantulus lange Suncus cf. etruscus | Myosorex robinsont PRIMATES +Simopithecus darti +Parapapio jonesi +P. broomi +P. whiter +Papio robinsoni + Australopithecus africanus tCercopithecoides williamsi LAGOMORPHA Pronolagus randensis RODENTIA + Mystromys hausleitnert tM. dart ? Tatera cf. brantst Grammomys cf. dolichurus Pelomys cf. fallax +tRhabdomys cf. pumilio Aethomys cf. namaquensis Mastomys cf. natalensis Leggada cf. minutoides + Potamochoeroides shawt +P. antiquus Tragelaphus scriptus Taurotragus oryx Syncerus caffer Damaliscus cf. pyrgatus ? D. cf. lunatus + Alcelaphus robustus tA. helmer Connochaetes taurinus + Makapania broom +? Raphicerus campestris {Gazella wellsi + ? Phenacotragus vanhoepent { ?Antidorcas marsupialis Dendromus cf. mesomelas + ?Malacothrix makapani Steatomys cf. pratensis +Palaeotomys gracilis +Hystrix major Hi. africae-australis + Xenohystrix crassidens +Gypsorhychus makapant tCryptomys robertst CARNIVORA ? Canis mesomelas pappos tCynictis penicillata brachyodon tCrocuta cf. brevirostris + Hyaena makapani + Therailurus barlowi + Megantereon sp. nov. HYRACOIDEA +Procavia antiqua +P. transvaalensis +Procavia sp. PERISSODACTYLA +? Stylohipparion steytler +Equus helmet + Metaschizotherium (?) transvaalensis Ceratothertum stmum Diceros bicornis HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 301 ARTIODACTYLA C. caerulus Hippopotamus amphibius +Redunca darts + Notochoerus euilus Redunca arundinum +Potamochoeroides hypsodon R. fulvorufula +P. shawt Oryx gazella Giraffa camelopardalis tAlcelaphus robustus +Libytherium cf. olduvaiense +A. helmet Strepsiceros strepsiceros Connochaetes taurinus Tragelaphus angasi + Oreotragus major Taurotragus oryx +Makapania broomi Syncerus caffer Aepyceros melampus +S. cf. makapani +tGazella gracilior tCephalophus pricer +Phenacotragus vanhoepent ‘ELANDSFONTEIN, HOPEFIELD (SOUTH AFRICA) (Modified from Singer, 1957) PHOLIDOTA +Panthera leo spelaea Manis sp. + Megantereon gracile PRIMATES PROBOSCIDEA {Simopithecus oswaldi hopefieldensis tLoxodonta (Palaeoloxodon) cf. anti- +Homo sapiens rhodesiensis (‘Saldanha quus recki Man’) +? Archidiskodon sp. LAGOMORPHA PERISSODACTYLA Lepus sp. (cf. capensis) +Equus (Hippotigris) plicatus +E. helmer oot bil +E. cf. sandwithi Bathyergus Sp. (cf. suillus) Ceratotherium simum Georychus sp. (cf. capensis) Diceros bicornis HAystrix sp. (cf. africae-australis) ee Otomys sp. (cf. saundersiae) Parotomys sp. (cf. brantsz) (eas ee tM. paiceae CARNIVORA + Tapinochoerus meadowst Canis mesomelas Hippopotamus amphibius Canis adustus + Sivatherium olduvaiense(*) {Lycaon pictus magnus +Giraffa cf. gracilis Mellivora capensis +Homotoceras sp. Herpestes sp. (cf. ichneumon) Taurotragus oryx Herpestes eogale Redunca arundinum FHyaena brunnea Raphicerus campestris tCrocuta spelaea Antidorcas marsupialis Lynx caracal + Antidorcas sp. Leptailurus serval - Tragelaphus(?) sp. 302 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM cf. Hippotragus niger Connochaetes sp. tcf. H. leucophaeus +Lunatoceras sp. + Hippotragus sp. _ tPelea sp. +Damaliscus cf. dorcas tcf. Gazella wellsi +Damaliscus sp. tGazella sp. nov. (1) See footnote to Langebaanweg fauna (p. 280). (7) In the other faunal lists Tragelaphus has not been substituted for the earlier labelling Strepsiceros. Refer now to table 1 on pages 303 to 313. COMMENTARY ON THE PUBLISHED FAUNAL ASSOCIATIONS AT HIPPARIONID SITES IN AFRICA MIOCENE Oued el Hammam and Marceau Arambourg (1959) has clearly demonstrated that these two sites contain fundamentally the same fauna: both include Hipparion africanum, Samotherium sp. and Hyaena algeriensis, and cannot but be contemporaneous, as is confirmed by their stratigraphy. It seems clear that these assemblages correspond to a very special and, so far, little-known stage of development of the fauna of Africa, posterior to the Burdigalian and anterior to the ‘classical Pontian’. The fauna from these sites are very different from the well-represented assemblage of the Lower Miocene in East Africa (Losodok, west of Lake Rudolph; Rusinga and Moboko Islands in the Kavirondo Gulf of Lake Victoria) and South West Africa. The typical Burdigalian assemblages contain, inter alia, Mastodon cf. longirostris, Deinotherium hobleyi, Aceratherium, Teleoceras, and Anthracothertidae, Propalaeo- choerus, Bunolistriodon, Dorcatherium, Creodonta, none of which are found at Oued el Hammam, nor are the anthropomorpha which constitute the typical African ‘touch’ of this Burdigalian fauna. The only similarity between the sites and a Burdigalian fauna is the presence at Oued el Hammam of an orycterope, namely, Orycteropus mauritanicus which is comparable with Myorycteropus McInnes of East Africa. The separation between Oued el Hammam and the Lower Miocene fauna of East and South West Africa is emphasized by the presence (at Oued el Hammam) of Giraffidae (Samotherium and Palaeotragus), the development of Bovidae (Damalavus, Gazella, Tragocerus, Cephalophus) and the appearance of Hyaena and especially of the equids with Hipparion africanum. On the other hand, the assemblages from the two North African localities are at first sight characteristic of the so-called ‘classical Pontian’ of Eurasia (Eppelsheim, Pikermi, Mont Luberon). However, on detailed study and comparison of the several groups involved, Arambourg has shown that Eurasian ‘Pontain’ assemblages and the material from Oued el Hammam may belong to the same ensemble, but they are not identical: specific and generic differences exist and there is not even a single species in common (table 2). 393 HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE uRyquies, IsvAq dT]Tesa810[O eiofuey IMey Ee PIO PE esnpyO Py TeAn IO pee [OIeT olee(@) UIvUue yy OSIeY] emquinyyy HH wexorg Jowyoyy DAMNVVEXONV'I YIIMIIPUO MA, vs vs ~ syyieay jo “5 eeErriA. I alavy, |i a aed Be | preyedoy eIjaurIo') JOATY [VPA mba be x b be WIT SI[Og me o IevIPWOIS] suvIyIIeMG yessuedeyeyy UI9JUOFYINIS sune yj, *(GQ61) IaBUIg OsTe 999 ze “ds snoayjuqouis et UO S ae EDP Sx eLUDYJDUOL 64. elploaso snzayjIGoulny SAaLVWIdd ISdaQlAYIS “JD Stsagqowuipy oa "ds suodjyy “JO wosffoas JO “Y sisuago “ja snydojouryy Vad LdOulHo WUOSULGOL XALOSOLTAY Sngsn.4ja "JO snauny #0j0NG JOD) SISUASSUND] DANP1IOL) » issaugs ajvacuojcjyy * * SNYIUAYACYIDAG “JO “T snnbyup snjnjuvyqary iduv) snynquvy dary » LOCDUL X149] NP xe pajaqs DG]00L0]Y") » LUOPPIULDY DYILAJOSKAY’) » snnbyup snuosd]quiv04g » VUOALLOUSNI ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 304 sVECIES) dT[Iesad10[O eiofuey Ime yl AD ANP IO TT PeAn ele i eAnP© Lesa powey owoO weue yy OsIVyy emquinyy] se Cozies JowyoyD DAMNVVEELONV'T 3IIMIIPUO A, syyIvopy joy eae ie) VON PG eye | eljausor) JOATY [BVA WIeY SAO > ale, 4 xX xX Xe Xe | Xe ae Da DGS. Gi). SGle.G XW exe x : xe a ae. Ee. 4 eae DES. Ge Ee Ee.¢ x xX Pome ent ep le babel ee AS ae as al ea ee eG tg eee ee ec ee eee ree Ie eae Wi @ ee oe: Se teu Oe aoa er fe By BeOS) ‘ds srunpy VLOCITOHd syyoxps sndaT sisuadoa sndaT ** SIsuUapUDL SNIDIOUOLY VHdYOWNOOVI peuieien $ap109ayj1go24a’) : "ds owof] » suargvs "JO "Hy SISUAISAPOYL OULOFT sisuadvo sndosyqun)a J, » SOU SNIAYIUGOJOAISN SNISNGOL "Tx 125109 SnqosyjUDLDg » snuisin “J "* 1U0SULgOL “J SGaISNGUD “Tx a 1pozt “dx quupunau o1dvg x Be de WUl00Lq “dd wauol "dy snnbyup orgngving suasur snaayjigourd » a solous SNIBYIUGOFLOY) 3°5 HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE a Te i % = mo XK mK me xX rw ms ite me vs ~~ be LOlDUL XILISCHT 4 "* 17aQGUv9 SAU04 0701 » "* $1p1IDLT SCUOJOADIVE ISJUDLQ “JD SMUOJOLDG SNIDIINSIUN “JD “PAT "* 1UQUAN] “JD sUMOjOd Ay aDISLAPUNDS "JD “Ox SNIDLOAML “JD SKUOZE) sisuaqpsg “JO sdiuoqnays wupgoyou "Wd x pga] "JO XiLYJOIDIDI, SDI]AULOSAUL "JD °C "+ snnbiup snwmospua x SIAJSAGUDI SNULOJSOIIDS . ee LOlOUL ‘Jo 7 Saplojnulul "JO vpossaT sisuapoyDU “JO stiuojsDy snanpavg “32 ° 7, qudnigap SMULO}IDY J, snpyqosdays "JO sdwuoyjap sisuanboupu "yo sdwoyjay oujvuing “39 sMuopqoyy x xppjof “yo stuojag 14709 SCUMSDC 4 SNANYIYOP “JI SCUOWUDLE) — SLDINILND snjppousaqy 1SJUDLG “JD VAIN T, HOD Wis 1IUJIAISNDY “WA x snnbyup stuouscjy 4affv9 "JO "q apLIDIS “Tx ABJSDPANS “Tx ipojsuasvy sajapad oe sisuaqva SnLay VILNAdGOU ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 306 be uelyquies isvAq ,I[Tesas10[O, erofuey IMey AI feanploO III A0P[O II feAnplO T 4nPpio >< ~ be pOI9e] owlO weury osIey x emquinyjy x IEH voyxorg JowyayyD DAMNVVEHLONV'T ~ YIOMIOPUO AA, XxX = ce "* — sasuadva psoayjayy Siojosau uodI0jQ XN ta ey ‘* snudpu sno *T Gi ae snag uovaT : ae DULDYD "A > alee be ri < 4ayang sagin4 ie - ¥ snysnpp *F) XY e oi sis ‘+ 29Y.9U0]Q19} “5 ¥. EA ats ee; SUAJSOMAILG *') xp x wv ws ee XOLD "Hy oe gi er d) Snuvq1Lfd * sodqog spjauosau *) SUJSOLIJD] SDJaULOSAUL *F SDIAULOSAUL S1UD‘y VduddISsit ax aa! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "“snyjims “JO snsiadyyog 1sp4aqgor SCUuorGaL’) » me = sasuadna “Jd snyst10axy 4 ae ame eae 1ugoyout “ey ay |e ae = JOUIUL *5)y OF alse os "+ aaop snysdysosga) » Yas ae af LOUIUL SNUWOM9T x X a "* snupiuapuuns sdiuouodsy J, XN i 2 sugpssuia X1LgSCYOUIX £4 : 0109105 "Hx supssnv-avnL{o FT DIDISILI “JD od * * ve * vs ve an syyWeoy jo yD |e Biel Vas Peso m Preyedoy eI[2UIOD JOATY [PEA UNE SI[Og IevIPWOIY SUBIFIIEMG yessuvdeyepyy UIOJUOPAINIG Sune J, umoys “de ; -. 1aj1YR “dy 307 nb snp.og “q ~ % ~ XxX OO eT dm oh a = + 09) viayqung XY ye 56 me bo moajang eg X Creel Xe oe = "* wmopsvg sninjrpsay T, » xX = ae as se jonas *"T XY 3 ae i + uojUry "Te XN ee oe "+ snapjads snjnivjqaT XK Xx xX = = ae ]0I0LD9 ]DIDAD') xX e: es es "+ 1D9DLD9 XUCT = < SUAPISSDLI SUIOMT ye ae viet gle Y oo oa 56 aupgoyou Sig 5 are “0 ogsip 2 ie pauunsg Duavd py SULJSOMNILG “JD “Dy DA De DINjsNUaa *1) pav]ags *") x DIJaBUD DINIOLI “Te D4NIOLI DINIOL) DTS Tae X vs a "+ wi4agsagpis DUIDMINT x i xafiof puapvdraaT X ans ae uopodysvig DyoppINIUad “Hy zy 2 pypjyjraiuag syaud’) X|IX ie "+ — S1SUBJDOASUDAY SNYILVSSOL) x 4 a = "+ snsoupnod x0]1F 4 x x xX i pis o ** younauyn “Fy x Bae ine = = nod “Fy XxX ee eg "* sagosaus Sagsaquazy X aE "* pyyMaLins DIDILUNS xX 4 ae = sie sisuagva ‘PV xX X a oe aS sisuagoo xduop cL Sl SN a a + las be = mb be HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE x eddy OM be (mW ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 308 uerquies), seh oT[Iesos10[O viofuey Ime yy AI !eanplo III fe4nplo II reanplo X|X|X Nintice I et) poe] ould, — be weurey OSIVYy BMWNA (be iieer ers | Jowysyr) DEMNVVELONV'I YIIMIIPUO MA, SyIZaPT JOD [ERICA Peqst1op J be Prpyedoy eI[IUIOT) uopoxoj0an’ Dd % ‘ds "Vy SUSUA]DDASUDL) "VY » ED Peg 1YIOL "VW xp SNID{GOXA “Vy xX es ek cusps UOPOYSIPYILY 4 oe o- oe pUuvdI1 1A f0 ay DIYUD]IO DJUOPOXOT y ‘ds uopoydojosajs'y, SISUASIDY UOPOTI4S' ‘ds uopodajs'y, sisuaCuay SnIUDUP », XY oa <3 "* ds wnasayjoyquior » VACdTIOSOdO Ud PPS "ds ‘Ox snndonpen SNGOLICLOE) ». VLV.LUNYOTTNGN.L snpoygar0jo4p7 “JO VIGUdINNId EEL WNILAYJOULOFT ye ; ‘ds "W Sse EON SNPOLWYIVIN' : ‘aou ‘ds "fy UOPOUCLNA “TAT » ** a7IDIF UOALAUDTAYV’ bd bX be be bX JOATY [REA WIe 7 sI[Og IevIpUOLY SUvIAIIEMS yessuvdeyeyy UI9}UOFYIIIS sune J, oo9 HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE ares Sarre Saree bd rm — Xb bay De be bbq. mo ~ aia “ds sns90YI0J0\/ SNZIDGULOI SNLBOYIOION. SN]INA SNLIOYIOION » "* spoomdoy "Nx SISUBGDI SNLBOYIO{ON, aVdIns VIALOVGOILYV "ssnaquyqup * FT sniqiyquinjolg "HH "+ pIndUNSDUL * FT» sGos1og snupnjodoqqizy +. V.LNOGODNV s1u4on1g so1anuqy "+ xpoif[a S0439140GUILIG "* wnwis wnisayjoj0La') sisuaypvasupd (i) "We IdUUBY UNILAYJOZIYISDIAIN » esnupyauLsos sndqiyoysvuscing » RUS lm paconb “Ts Lous eH ape snqvay “x SISUAMDMOP]O “7 Unads “We “Ay yjayoing snnby os 50 ellangcays et 29SU9}19g]D Uu0lsDgqryojc7s » in e OSs apursgqry] » VIALOVGOSSTadd ‘ds ‘dx SISUAJDVASUDA] “Tx onbyuvn “dT sisuaqo) v10vI0Lg VadIOOVYAH be tba by babe be St rddy by babe P Od HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE % mm be sosansgais sosansgass AVGIAOd ~ % ~ ~ * x PSie Gi gs xX Bees os “f asuarvanpjo wnrsay}CGrT x X ee ee ee ee $1904 Dx esl Ail Se = x x % ef Rees syppsngojauns vffrary a ee eee ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 312 ueyquies), be seh oT]IesoB10[O es1ofuryy Ime y gr wd OE sa ee AS On grat ln. «ty ae Ere » main ‘Y yt _ * mu001q viundoyoypy » = fet Par oe eo. ‘ds ‘O yale we Neh oa sdanduoy “Ox XY on . ** LOLDUL SNFD.1N09LC sil o« Sn3Dp4140940 sndvA40aLC—) X|X|X\|X ey "* SNIYNUAS SNULAND] U0TL05) » XY axe at mR tive sypupst oe é x: s a ve SNINULOIND] “y — oe ee Par) oe nous fs 7 X oe °° oe ee snnbyup Ja xX |X| X xX | X >, Sle, 9 x “ hs snuiinny sajavyz0uu0’y 4 Ala pits ae (¢) uajuny snsvyvagy, ee ne we 1Uulaqsuaqyou) * La a te SNISNGOL "Vx ee DULDDI “7 oa apy 4 ms obs yayuranyoy snyqvjany » oa ee ee es ee ‘ds ‘Gig 3 %6 De ba X ee oe a. ee ‘ds "Wx >a ‘ante ee ar) oe ‘ds "Fx x x |X Sense eG: x | ¢ de se Sa snyoun) ‘2 “G pe a Pd ee oe ee ee 4S “Tx xX 8 aS ps x -3 snsivsdg "JO "Gq xy xX xX es = SIULONISNSUD SNISIIDULDG » X xX Xx eo ee ee ee Dyazos ‘O DS ee ee ee ee psiaq xO ee ee ee se ‘ds "Hx Xda bd Bb bbs be II teAnplo J feAnplo [OW eT OUIO weuey OSsIv yy Jawypsyy Pesto yf preyedoH el[auIo') Sune J, ae LAAN WIT SIJOY TeVIPUIOIS] SUBIYIIEMG emMquinyjyy [ED Veer JOATY [eVA A AR IO I] APIO YIOMIOPUO MA syyeay joy yessuedeyeyy UIO}JUOFAINIG DAMNVVEELONV'T ‘WLUIWIe PY] [9 ponG Woy ivy} pu viseiny jo eunvy UenUog [OISse[D, 94} Us9M}0q UOstIedWIOT *% ATAV, 313 wipUlsas *q qanoL Snsv0IDIDg sisuaisas]D * ET apnUuojDs DUaDA ET SNIUDPLANDUL *C ulipnos sngo1aja1¢ WNAUDLLAZYpAUL * FT wnuvniL{o “FT avs UoLLDg Guy supjuarso snuryso1aouqg snaapug *q LaYyIDULAILATYIS SNULYLOLIIICY NVWWVH TH d400 VISV EAA [jouNxs = V !youT}xXo = y ] "(gS61 ‘AayvoryT Joye pojdo1109 oe sepmng oy J, ‘*eyep [euossad ‘1a8utg Aq psovjdoar st ppayodoy 107 ys1] 9y3 Inq ‘ZL pur g ‘F sopqey ‘Eg61 ‘axoorD 0} Surps099e) voTIpY YINOG pu jsey UT Sos }e sose[quiasse [LUN] 9UID0}sSIO[ J 9} Jo sisdoudg *1 ATaV], HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE xX xX = oa SISUBLDMNOP]O S1QOLO]IT xe sick. ce "+ snuvnisfo sapruosvyquyng » Dé ee ee oe oe ‘ds (;) Ve ARapsece cp decd : “+ ++ sypadnsupu svosopuuy s XY ac ac oe quaqaoyuna xX XxX & ae "* 24904 SNSDJOIDUIY J x Pa ee ee oe oe ‘ds "Dx XY she ee Sst -* qpa0ulay “Dx pi eg x P's oe ee ee ee 1puog "De Bs piel eae XY oe oe oe on 18]]902 “De o¢ ee ee oe 401719048 ‘Dx P's aS > ars _ = a YUDLS “Dy AX. Be eels ed "+ sosingav1g DI]AZVS 0]]AZV) x xX . ers o "+ Luaqypa sniUup190;07 xX | > aed XK xX X ms vs + sndupjau sosaokgapy ae ‘* a3 SNINULOINA SNFDAJOIDTIN » eal ey - "+ WNL $04990JDUNT » ae s|cke ¥ é ag me SILISAGULDI SNLANYIOY x 314 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM These differences indicate that the fauna of Oued el Hammam is more primitive than that of the Eurasian ‘Pontian’, thereby suggesting an ancient biogeographical autonomy of Africa. The presence of a fauna more primitive than the ‘classical Pontian’ does not necessarily mean that it antedates the Pontian. However, as is indicated in the section on the geological aspects of the sites (vide supra p. 283), the Oued el Hammam deposit lies under lacustrine or marine deposits. These contain clearly recognized Upper Miocene fauna of the Sarmatian or of the Tortono-Sahelian age, which were formed by the marine transgression at the end of the Miocene. As indicated by Arambourg, there is no possible correlation between Oued el Hammam and the ‘classical Pontian’ which is formed posteriorly to the Sarmatian. PLIOCENE The Hipparion-bearing sites in North Africa and in the Nile Valley, which are usually considered to be Pliocene, cannot be satisfactorily dated on the basis of the fauna alone. The faunal assemblages at Tozeur, Ain el Bey and Mascara are rather poor. Their antiquity is suggested by the presence of Merycopotamus, Helladotherium and Rhinoceros pachygnathus. The Pliocene nature of these sites can only be determined from their geology. At Wadi Natrun, none of the rare fossils recovered is characteristic of a particular period. Determination of stratigraphical relationships is necessary for the assessment of the Pliocene date of the fossiliferous beds. PLEISTOCENE The simple comparison of lists of fauna from numerous sites often results in misleading or incorrect conclusions for the following reasons: 1. The assemblages may represent a sampling of fauna from different biotopes, and furthermore, the sampling (i.e. collecting) may have been made by means of different methods and for differing requirements. For example, in the case of small rodents, they may be an incidental part of a general collec- tion recovered during a thorough investigation, or they may have been sought for exclusively from, say, breccia by a specialist. However, they may have been overlooked in the field when the investigator was merely collecting the larger bones. Thus they would be absent from the collected assemblage, but this would not reflect the fact that they may have been present in situ. Thus someone studying or re-studying a particular collection, and being unaware of the conditions of recovery of the material, may accurately record frequencies but these may yet be misleading. 2. Different palaeontologists may use criteria and terminology at variance with others, often because of a familiarity with material from particular areas or countries. In addition the fragmentary nature of certain specimens may be responsible for differing interpretations. 3. Just as. different biotopes may express slight differences in similar forms, so climatic differences may influence similar forms even in adjacent hee Beg geist AF able 2 Swear cS HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 315 regions. These differences may be interpreted on a specific rather than on a subspecific level, thus influencing statistical analyses. Consequently, a practical method of comparing sites within a geographical region is by studying the results obtained by either a single palaeontologist or by a particular institute. This requirement is partially met for the ‘Villa- franchian’ sites of North Africa, for the australopithecine breccias in South Africa, for Olduvai Gorge, and possibly for Laetolil and Rawi in East Africa. It is to be remembered that the success of the investigation within each of these three geographical units varies. The North African ‘Villafranchian’ fauna is characterized by the associa- tion of the latest mastodonts with primitive elephants, of the Sivatheriinae with Giraffa, and of the hipparionids with the modern Equidae. However, there is sufficient evidence available to suggest that such associa- tions, found in several places in Africa, are not necessarily contemporaneous. Unfortunately, the term ‘Villafranchian fauna’ is loosely used with a different interpretation in different areas, but it may only be applied, sensu stricto, in a chronological sense to the Mediterranean basin. Arambourg (1947) proposed a relationship between the fossil-bearing sites of Africa according to the presence or absence of archaic elements, such as Archidiskodon planifrons, Anancus, Stegodon and Chalicotheridae. During the Lower Pleistocene some of these forms seem to have disappeared, being replaced by A. recki, while other primitive groups with tertiary affinities like Stylohipparion, Deinotherium and Libytherium persisted. By means of the Proboscidea sequence, a subdivision of the ‘Villafranchian’ can be formulated: A. Lower ‘Villafranchian’ Characterized by the PRESENCE of Anancus, Stegodon, Stegolophodon (?), and the appearance (in a stratified deposit) of Archidiskodon (or Elephas sub- planifrons, planifrons, africanavus, and exoptatus): Kanam, Kaiso, Garet Ichkeul. B. Middle ‘Villafranchian’ Characterized by the extinction of Stegodon, the persistence of Anancus, Mastodon, Archidiskodon (or Elephas) planifrons or subplanifrons and exoptatus and the first appearance of Palaeoloxodon recki (or E. meridionalis): Koro ‘Toro, Laetolil, Ain Hanech, Olduvai I. C. Upper ‘Villafranchian’ Characterized by the presence of Anancus, Stegodon, Mastodon, and the continued presence of A. exoptatus, E. africanavus and even Deinotherium: Omo. The post-‘Villafranchian’ horizon commences when Anancus, Stegodon, and Mastodon as well as primitive forms of Archidiskodon (exoptatus) and Elephas (planifrons, africanavus) become totally extinct, coincidental with the appearance of Loxodonta africana and atlantica as well as the further development of P. reckz. 316 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM North Africa In a comparison of Garet Ichkeul with Ain Hanech, the fauna of which are substantially the same, Arambourg (1949) concluded that Garet Ichkeul was the more ancient (Lower ‘Villafranchian’) because of the more abundant E. planifrons and Stylohipparion at the former site, while the latter had remains of — P. recki. There is good evidence that there is close identity between Ain Hanech (and Bel Hacel) on the one hand, and Garet Ichkeul, Ain Boucherit (i.e. Beni Foudda of Pomel) and Oued el Akrech (Arambourg and Choubert, 1957), on the other. On the basis of the fauna alone, it does not seem possible to compare these in any great detail with the other North African Pleistocene Hipparion-bearing sites. Total number of — Extinct Extant Extinct Extant identified species species species Total Extinct % %o SOUTH AFRICA Panne ec. si ais 34 25 9 73°5 36-0 Sterkfontein va ey a7 26 II 70°4 42°3 Makapansgat .. i 70 43 27 61°4 62°7 Swartkrans - He 39 32 7 82 21°9g Kromdraai se ee 41 29 12 70"7 4AI*4 Bolt’s Farm ce Le 56 35 21 62-6 60-0 Vaal River ae, ae 35 20 15 57 751 Cornelia .. ee sil 23 17 6 74 35°3 Hopefield a AN 45 23 22 51°2 95°6 Florisbad ate ai 32 15 iy 46-9 113°4 Vlakkraal. . oe By 18 9 9 50 100 Cave of Hearths 5 45 10 35 22°2 350°0 Wonderwerk _... ye 25 8 17 32 213°0 RHODESIA Chelmer .. me aM II 6 5 — — Broken Hill KE it 31 yi 24 22°6 34.2 Mumbwa ue ais 18 3 15 16°6 500 EAST AFRICA Kaiso ve ah is 10 8 2 80 25 Kanam .. is ae 16 12 4 75°0 oa Omo is ae ah 21 15 6 71*4 40 Laetolil .. Aye aye 33 20 13 60-6 65-0 Olduvai I Be wis 34. 28 6 82°2 21°4 Olduvai II ue ae 49 38 II Vir nae § 29°0 Olduvai III a de 23 18 5 78-4 27°8 Olduvai IV a ve 39 30 9 76-9 30°0 Rawi a ie Sie 7 4 3 — — Kanjera a Bi 17 14 3 82°3 Q21°4 Olorgesailie Ay he 9 Gi 2 — = Eyasi oe by M. 24 9 15 37°5 166-0 ‘Gamblian’ a ate 12 7) 5 58°4 7I°4 TABLE 3. The relationships between identified extinct and extant fauna from African Pleistocene sites. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 317 East and Central Africa The OLDUVAI GORGE has been extensively studied. From the four Beds, 55 species have been identified (table 1), Bed II and IV containing respectively 49 and 39 of them (table 3). However, recent discoveries and more detailed analyses will considerably alter these figures. Dietrich (1942), Arambourg (1947), Hopwood (1951) stressed the general Middle Pleistocene character of the Olduvai faunal assemblage. It has been pointed out that no available faunal evidence suggests that the lower part of Olduvai is of Lower Pleistocene age. This view will probably be considerably modified when descriptions and analyses of recent discoveries are published shortly. In this paper, only the available published data are assessed. Leakey (1963) emphasizes the point that “Bed I covers a very long period of time with a gradual change from a very wet climate at the beginning to savanna conditions and then subdesert ones’. It is no longer possible to speak simply of ‘the fauna of Bed I’. He also points out that the fauna from Bed I, although ‘Villafranchian’ and older than Omo, does not conform with the Lower ‘Villafanchian’ fauna as represented in East Africa at Kanam East and West. Furthermore, it is no longer certain whether Bed I contains Hippopotamus gorgops, Taurotragus oryx, Tragelaphus strepsiceros, and even Palaeoloxodon recki which is super-abundant in Bed II and Bed IV. Olduvai I i a. DMA Cave of Hearths .. she) 1 E92 Swartkrans * am aE S Broken Hill. . ne ce 2220 Olduvai III ae nee) 25°o Wonderwerk re i) (B20 Olduvai II .. a Ria. 2ato Eyasi ae 5 uh da ge Olduvai IV eh i 30°0 Florisbad_ .. He Be 242) Cornelia... rk ml aS Hopefield .. ge YE vi ES Taung ag es we 2 36" 0 Vaal River a alent ap@ Omo Bi we ee AO) Lattolit ".. ns 3 O06 Kromdraai ie wet) Ard Makapansgat 2 eh Omer Sterkfontein a” wale Caen Bolt’s Farm. . oe teh, 2 ™6 Bolt’s Farm. . Se Hat KOOSO Sterkfontein on Yin OT Makapansgat i et MO 2 7 Kromdraai Ae ee oy] Paetohil | .. “4 ia: G50 Omo Bee ua a ig TAN Vaal River Bes ne 75:1 Taung aS ae ee 7/939 Ie Hopefield .. ae aie ens 0 Cornelia... wi eM Mae 7 ao) Florisbad .. A is RLS A Olduvai IV ee ae 76°9 Eyasi 8 ate .. 166-0 Olduvai II ae ms Tigied: Wonderwerk ie ae) 2130 Olduvai III a ms 78° 4 Broken Hill. . ne aie AcBie-'O Swartkrans oe bel NOHO Cave of Hearths .. ea SOO Olduvai I S re oz TABLE 4. List of sites in the order of increasing proportions of extant species. Ratios (extant/extinct) are determined only for those sites where more than 20 species have been identified. TABLE 5. List of sites in the order of increasing proportions of extinct species. Ratios (extinct/total) are determined only for those sites where more than 20 species have been identified. Peqsiop.y IsvA PeaePioO AI 0-g C.1? FEANETO III 6.1 §-9 0.gS Cc .eF FEANPIO II Pee). @) 0.91 €.9g1 1.G1 P.Ez TGs TYOW2T owO g-F eb oS && is9) & Ea o.G1 €.9 L.& oO. L.& Tw YIaMIOpuoM z.6 9-86 SUJIVOPY JO 2ALD | _ 0.Sz b.9 9:8 P.L L.9 €.¢ 6. JOATY [et 1.G1 O-.O! P.61 preyedoy €.66 | F.g v.P Gr 1.9 | 6.1 g-S V.1 9:¥ | g-1 o.§ cae 1-6 g-&1 | G.L P.L1 | ¥.G1 g-4z | o-L1 1-11 | ¥.6 g-O1 LY ¢ bY 1G G TI gv Gc i rae gS 19 G LE IV CP G 9I aV aS 8 Q ie S & 5 tae fale B : g-P ro) TeeIpulolyy [qo ~ 1 ay) opryM « Aur je pasuasazdos Sse 39UT}xXa Jy} Jo sige jeonsneig *G. a1av J, GG = S ~ I SUBIFUEMS foo ‘Ow, ~ g-& ra by ™~ yedsuedeyxeyy to ~ C.8 QI €.% g-1 6.1 o-§ 1.6 Iv S ~ UI9}UOFAII1 P.G1 C.za1 Q-II oli V.vz Bune, a peqsi1of ‘+ wedg AI f®Anp[o Itl pag (9) IT reANpl[O TeenPio Tove T “* owoO WH Uex70rg YIIMIIPUO AA syyIvap JO "Dy JOATY [PBA Preyedoy eIjaUIOT) ULIv,T SIO reeIpulory suvIyIIeMG yessuedeyepy UTI}UOFAINIS ** SZunevy, HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 319 OMO has classically been equated with Olduvai I and II but recently a proposal has been made that it is more similar to the base of Olduvai II (tables 4, 5). The extinct fauna common to Omo and Beds I and II are 30-3% and 20:4% of the total respectively (table 6). There is no substantial difference between the faunal assemblages except for the presence of Anancus and hominids at Olduvai. The absence of t HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 331 early stages of wear in some teeth. This is true not only in Neohipparion, but in Nannippus and Pliohippus, though extremely rare in the latter.’ Hypostylid This is very frequently observed in Equus stenonis and in zebra but it is very rarely seen in Hipparion. However, it is sometimes found in the African forms, the most typical example of which is a M, from Omo (Joleaud, 1933). EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF THE STYLIDS The development of these stylids seems to be influenced by a common factor: a higher frequency of ectostylids in a particular group is correlated with a more precocious appearance of the protostylid (i.e. a higher protostylid) in the same population, and vice versa. In a particular group it is noted that the protostylid seems to be more frequently, more strongly and more permanently developed than the ectostylid. There seems to be an evolutionary pattern in the tendency to build stylids, from Merychippus (possibly from Parahippus which already shows a weak proto- stylid) through Miocene times up to Hipparion. Arambourg (1959) notices that this ‘tendency to develop cingular formations’ is already present in the Upper Miocene H. africanum from Oued el Hammam. The tendency seems to have developed further during Pliocene and early Pleistocene times, being most obvious in the African Hipparion, in which the most recent forms show the strongest development. Protostylids and ectostylids appear on the milk teeth of Merychippus in which they show slight development. They are constantly present and show a fair degree of development on the milk teeth of all Hipparion, and they appear on the permanent dentition of the African Pleistocene Hipparion. Along another evolutionary line of the Equidae, the Pliohippus—Equus sequence, it has been shown that protostylids and ectostylids remain weakly developed, the hypostylid being temporarily more developed, as, for example, in Equus stenonis. With the appearance of E. caballus, all the stylids have practically disappeared. EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CONES AND STYLIDS In a phyletic perspective, it has been established that the additional stylids have originated from enamel buds on the basal cingulum of brachyodont _ teeth. They developed first on the milk dentition and only later in the evolu- tionary sequence, and in particular groups, did they become permanent features of the adult dentition, appearing initially on M, and M, and eventually on the premolars. For example, it is known that the parastylid was present in Parahippus, but only on the milk teeth as an ill-developed feature. Later it became a constant and developed characteristic, even of permanent teeth, in Merychippus and later equids of the same phylum. The ectostylid is present in Merychippus, but only on the milk teeth, and then only occasionally. It becomes 332 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM an element of the permanent dentition in Hipparion, where it appears to be constant in some of the latest representatives of the group, i.e. in the Pleistocene forms of Africa. The tendency to raise enamel buds and isolate them is thus an early ontogenetic trend, which in evolution has progressively influenced the later (adult) stages of individual development. Later in this paper it is suggested that this trend was necessitated by the special architecture of the lower dentition with its characteristic development of highly individualized conids. The same trend, both ontogenetic and phylogenetic, seems to be recogniz- able in the formation and the isolation of the major cones in the upper dentition. It is really remarkable that the separation of the protocone and the hypocone from the main lophs is a gradual process, both ontogenetic and phylogenetic. The isolation of the protocone is rather ancient, and in the permanent teeth of Hipparion it has extended right down to the base of the crown. Contrariwise, the isolation of the hypocone is hardly noticeable on the permanent teeth, but in very early stages of wear it has been observed (vide infra p. 373). However in milk teeth the isolation of the hypocone reaches a much more characteristic degree in similar hipparionid groups, e.g. in the South Serengeti Hypsohipparion and in the Langebaanweg specimens (see p. 368). The difference between the expression of cones and stylids in milk and permanent dentitions on the one hand, and the more explicit individualization of these features among later representatives in some phyletic lines, on the other hand, seem to be linked with the increasing hypsodonty of the Equidae teeth in Upper Cenozoic times. ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS Gromova (1952) outlined the ecological significance of the development of the styles (stylids). She promoted the idea that they played a roleinstrengthen- ing the tooth so as to meet the heavier requirements of coarser food in a dry country where the grass was becoming very tough. The presence of additional pillars and folds probably increases the trituration power of the teeth and their resistance to pressure forces. Thus their appearance on the milk teeth would prevent or decrease rapid wear. Furthermore, Gromova developed a very suggestive correlation between elongation of the protocone, development of the stylids, thickening of the enamel, reduction of the external groove and higher hypsodonty. These functional features are different methods of improving the efficiency of a tooth with increased power of trituration. Consequently it was suggested that the styles were developed as an adaptation for improving the grinding of coarser food in drier climates. Sondaar (1961), in turn, described a similar correlation among the Spanish Hipparion which have the highest frequency of stylids. In H. koenigswaldi the maximal development of plications in the upper molars increased HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 333 the enamel surface with a double hypoconal groove, while the lower teeth display wavy internal depressions—entoflexid and metaflexid. However, H. elegans, with the same functional features, only displayed a very high frequency of protostylids. Most of the African Hipparion developed the stylids and a maximal hypsodonty, but not the extreme plications. There seems to be a balanced compensatory effect between stylids, plications and other elements so that, dependent on the specific region, one or other of these elements would develop to a varying degree. In America, Hipparion adapted to a hard and tough grass by an increased hypsodonty and a thickening of the enamel. ‘There can be no doubt that numerous plications and deep invaginations of the enamel pattern, as well as elevations of folds and stylids, provide the teeth with a more efficient trituration surface, and are very suitable for herbivorous animals in an area of increasing aridity (Stirton, 1941). TAXONOMY BASED ON STYLIDS The observation of the presence of stylids, both proto- and ectostylids, provided a new basis for generically differentiating the various African hipparionids. Haughton (1932) decided to create the genus Notohipparion because of the appearance of these stylids. Van Hoepen (1932) followed the same line of reasoning and erected the genus Stylohipparion, a distinction supported by Joleaud’s publications of S. lzbycum from Omo (1933). To some extent Dietrich (1942) followed the same tendency and, on the basis of the presence or absence of ectostylids, he divided the Serengeti LOWER cheek teeth into two groups. The group without stylids he termed Hypso- hipparion and he referred those with stylids to Stylohipparion. However, Dietrich did not attach a true taxonomic value to this separation because he found it impossible to distinguish between the upPER teeth of the two groups. He indicated that the frequency and development of styles (-ids) can be influenced by environment or selective pressure. Consequently he suggested that Stylo- hipparion might not represent a true genus, but only a variety formed under a strong developmental pressure (‘Entwicklungswucht’). However, outside Africa, the variation in the development of stylids did not lead to such taxonomic differentiation. Arambourg (1947) questioned the validity of a generic difference (Stylohipparion) based upon the presence of a feature which did not seem to separate clearly the Eurasiatic Pliocene forms. Nevertheless, he opined that the very high frequency and the strong develop- ment of the ectostylid in African forms supported the validity of the generic differentiation. Gromova also discussed this matter. She did not consider a true generic differentiation of African hipparionids valid. Ectostylids are not an entirely new characteristic in them exclusively but only represent a further development (either in frequency or structure) of a feature not at all exceptional (albeit irregular and even rare) in Eurasiatic Hipparion. Gromova proposed a sub- generic rank Hipparion (Stylohipparion) for the African group on the basis of 334 - ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM obvious peculiarities of this geographical unit. However, she writes of these ectostylids: ‘the importance as a diagnostic feature and generic character has been somewhat exaggerated’. This criticism can be expanded (see pp. 387-92) and even the sub-generic status of Stylohipparion can be questioned. In spite of the ‘air de famille’ (Aram- bourg, 1959) of all African hipparionids, the major reason for placing the Pleistocene African hipparionids in a special genus or sub-genus is precisely the presence and constancy of a very high frequency (which the present authors doubt) of the ectostylids. Although this is generally accepted, it is a highly debatable basis of separation. As mentioned above, Dietrich (1942) described a very large collection of lower teeth without ectostylids and placed them in the ‘genus’ Hypsohipparion. However, Arambourg (1947) suggested that these teeth had ‘erroneously’ been attributed to a hipparionid and that, in fact, they belong to F. zebra. This suggestion tends to remove Hypsohipparion from the hipparionid scene so that the ‘frequency’ of the ectostylids among African hipparionids still remains artificially high. Arambourg’s suggestion and his deletion of this group seem to have been largely accepted. Gromova’s mono- graph does not include the Serengeti material and does not refer to this paper of Dietrich (1942). Arambourg (1956) has maintained his viewpoint and speaks of ‘the typically African genus Stylohipparion characterized by the presence of a broad ectostylid’. Naturally this does not positively exclude Hypsohipparion, but in 1959, in a revision of the ‘few’ fossil African hipparionids, Arambourg explicitly limits the Pleistocene material to Stylohipparion, ‘characterized by a permanent ectostylid’. However, it can now be stated that the Serengeti Hypsohipparion material can no longer be excluded because of the assumption that it belongs to zebra. More than 90% of the small series of Langebaanweg equid upper teeth unquestionably belong to Hipparion so that it cannot be asserted that all the lower teeth belong to zebra merely because they do not possess an ectostylid. Not only is this statistically highly unlikely but also the morphological features, for example, the division of the talonid in Mg; (on Lg938, the only Mg available at Langebaanweg) would definitely exclude this group from belonging to zebra. Consequently, as the Langebaanweg material, in which the ectostylid ‘is constantly absent, belongs to Hipparion, there are no longer sufficient grounds to exclude a priori the Serengeti Hypsohipparion teeth from the hipparionid group only on the basis that they do not possess an ectostylid. Furthermore, it can now also be stated that the concept that African Hipparion possess a very high frequency or permanent presence of ectostylid is no longer applicable. Consequently the validity of the generic status of Stylo- hipparion becomes highly questionable. Later in this paper this will be discussed more fully in the light of the evidence presented. At present it suffices to state that in Africa the Pleistocene Hipparion may be found with and without ectostylids. : ¢ é 4 ’ HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 335 REVIEW OF PUBLISHED AFRICAN Hipparion CRANIAL MATERIAL MIOCENE Oued el Hammam and Marceau The presence of Hipparion in the Miocene of the Maghreb has been known since 1932 when Suess discovered a mammalian fossiliferous deposit upstream from Bou Hanifia (Oran) during the construction of the Oued el Hammam dam. On several occasions brief comments have been made about this material by, among others, Arambourg (1947, 1951, 1954). A rather rich collection of cranial and postcranial material, with fairly complete milk and permanent dentitions, as well as isolated teeth (table 7), have now been recovered from two Upper Miocene sites in Algeria (figs. 3 & 4): Oued el Hammam (Oran) and Marceau (Algiers). A detailed description was given by Arambourg (1959): he discussed their relationships to and differences from Eurasiatic forms of similar age, and other African forms of the Plio-Pleistocene period. He suggested that this material should constitute a new specific form, namely Hipparion africanum for which he proposed the following diagnosis: Hipparion with a large skull, medium-sized limbs and heavily built extremi- ties. Face and snout are elongated; nasal aparture is long and broad; orbits are situated far back; pre-orbital fossae are long, simple and distant from the orbit. Dentition of medium size: P?-M? = 141—154 mm. Upper molars with strongly plicated enamel; compressed elliptical or lenticular protocone. Cingular formations developed on lower milk teeth but a laminated protostylid sometimes persists on permanent molars. The limbs are rather short, with robust metapodials that have well-developed lateral digits. Arambourg emphasizes the ‘African character’ (vide infra) of the dentition of this new species: enamel plications and narrow elongated protocone, as well as a tendency to develop cingular formations. Because of these features which distinguish it from all Eurasiatic forms, and because of its stratigraphical location in the Upper Miocene, he suggested that this species should belong to an independent African stock, isolated on the continent of Africa since the end of the Miocene. Camp Berteaux Bourcart (1937) mentioned the discovery of Hipparion at Camp Berteaux (Taourirt, Eastern Morocco). This material and additional specimens, described by Ennouchi and Jeannette (1954), are now considered to belong to Hipparion africanum. Other sites It is not possible to comment on the Aipparion material that was merely mentioned by Dalloni (1915) and Solignac (1927), which was derived from 336 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM UPPER Specimen Pe Ps Ps M? M? M?# A-P length get be 141 33°0 26-0 25°0 23°0 23,°0 20°0 Mar.* 27°0O 24°0 Transv. breadth .. Bua 122 22 *'O) 24°0 23°0 16-0 141 22°5 24°5 25e 23°0 20°5 18°5 Mar.* 26-0 25°7 Height 122 48°0 58-0 60-0 47°0 Protocone length et 141 7°8 g°2 10°2 7°32 7°5 7°6 Mar.* 8-4 8 Protocone breadth a 141 5:0 4°0 a5 3°79 3°5 2°5 Mar.* 5:0 4°0 LOWER Specimen Py Pa P, MM, M, Mo eae ee ee, A-P Length ai! 143 30°0 .29"6. 2510. 25-2) 2h ome 89 27°0. 29°O. 25°0 29°@ 22700 Beam 3 29°O 24°0 29°5 20°97 21" s7ea Mar.*)" ares 6 30°5 24°2 26-0 105 31°6 29°0 30°74 Transv. breadth .. Mar.* 18:0 6 14*O 1474 13°5 105 12°O 12:0 9g *— Marceau: no number given. TaBLE 7. Measurements (mm.) of the teeth of Hipparion africanum (from Arambourg, 1959). the Upper Miocene layers of the lower Tafna Valley (near Guiard, Oran), and the Djebel M’Dilla ‘Pontian’ horizons (of Tunisia) respectively. Discussion on the ‘African character’ of Hipparion africanum Arambourg, 1959 The relationships of H. africanum, of the Upper Miocene of the Maghreb, to other African hipparionids have been discussed by Arambourg. He dis- tinguishes three species, stratigraphically separated: H. africanum of the Upper Miocene, H. sitifense of the Pliocene of the Constantine and Oran area, and Stylohipparion libycum of the ‘Villafranchian’ of North, East and South Africa. Despite the great temporal span, Arambourg believes that there is a ‘family air’ or unity common to these three forms, which distinguishes them from the Eurasiatic material, and which stresses the common origin of the African hipparionids, isolated since the end of the Miocene. From the description given of the skeletal material of H. africanum, it seems obvious that there is a marked difference between it and the Eurasiatic forms. Until the present, only teeth have been available for comparison, so that the lack of adequate comparative postcranial material has made it impossible gh om HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 337 to determine to what extent H. africanum shares common skeletal features with the African hipparionids of the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Dr. Leakey indicates (personal communication) that considerable postcranial material has now been recovered from Olduvai. These are to be described by Dr. R. H. Stirton of Berkeley, California, who will elucidate the skeletal relationships.* On the basis of the teeth alone, it is difficult to acknowledge a close resemblance between the three African species. As there is a long span of time separating H. africanum from Stylohipparion libycum, one expects to find some differences, but it is first necessary to assess and appreciate the importance of the resemblances stressed by Arambourg before it is possible to evaluate the phyletic implications. Of the ‘family air’ features linking H. africanum and the later African species, Arambourg considers two as most typical: (i) In the upper cheek teeth, the enamel plications and the shape of the protocone of the molars; (ii) In the lower molars, there is a tendency to develop additional cingular stylids. Two other classical features which will be discussed are the hypsodonty of the cheek teeth and the shape of the double knot in the lower molars. Enamel Plications : It is commonly believed that the enamel plications have little phylogenetic significance. The plications are very variable, being much influenced by functional and ecological conditions. In any event, because of the vast temporal and spatial differences, and especially climatic and biotopical environments, this feature cannot be used as a basis of comparison. This is just an a priori consideration. However, Arambourg writes (p. 93) that H. africanum is characterized by the complex pattern of enamel plications, which are more numerous than on most of the European forms. Although there is quite considerable variation in the complexity of the enamel at a particular period and in a particular area (compare H. crassum and concudense; Greek and Samos Pliocene forms), it cannot be denied that the Eurasiatic forms normally possess a rather plicated enamel mark-wall pattern. Furthermore it is certainly far more developed than that of the African Pliocene and Pleistocene species, which are actually characterized by their small number of plications. The multiple pli caballin seen in many teeth does not seem to be typically African either: it is observed in many other groups on both sides of the Mediter- ranean Sea, and also elsewhere—compare H. sitifense (Mascara), H. gracile (Pikermi), H. koenigswaldi, H. concudense (South Aragon), Hypsohipparion albertense (Serengeti), and even in America in Neohipparion eurystyle Cope, in which as many as four may occur on the anterolabial border of the hypoloph. Protocone: The elongated and narrow protocone is undoubtedly a typical and constant feature of all the African hipparionids so far known from the Pliocene and Pleistocene deposits. It also seems to be a distinct, strongly expressed evolutionary trend in the whole group (see pp. 354-5; table 14; * See Olduvia Gorge 1951-1961, 1 by L. S. B. Leakey (1965) which was published while this paper was in press. 338 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM figs. 12, 13). A satisfactory comparison of individual teeth at different stages of wear is difficult, and published sketches of this feature may be deceptive. Nevertheless, it is obvious that a comparison of the indices of the length and shape of those protocones available for study definitely confirms this ‘African feature’ of H. africanum. For all teeth, it shows a constant greater ‘African’ index than any of the European species considered (except for the breadth/ length index of P?, which in any event, is a rather atypical tooth). It is important to note that such a progressive feature, characteristic of the African phyletic line, can be traced back as far as the Upper Miocene. The double knot: Gromova (1952), in a recent review of all the available evidence, indicates that the original type of knot is the ‘stenonis’ one: it presents a very different metaconid and metastylid, the latter being strongly angulated, and separated from the metaconid by a narrow deep valley. This original type, found in the Merychippus ancestor, has been retained mostly in the American Hipparion. However, there seems to be a constant modification amongst Old World Hipparion: towards a ‘Hipparion’ type of knot in Eurasiatic forms, characterized by a symmetrical and rounded metastylid and metaconid separated by a wide and shallow valley; and towards a more ‘caballus’ type in Africa, where the metastylid is sub-triangular. The description and drawings of H. africanum indicate clearly that it has a ‘Hipparion’ type of knot, more typical of the Eurasiatic form and bearing no resemblance to the African forms. As H. africanum is the oldest species of Hipparion known in Africa, it needs to be decided whether it has acquired this ‘progressive’ feature very rapidly or whether the ‘Hipparion’ type of knot is not as progressive as was previously considered, having already been present in some Merychippine ancestor, and developed in parallel with the ‘stenonis’ type. Stylids: The tendency to develop stylids is quite marked in many, but not all, African forms. It is said to be expressed in H. africanum by a small laminated or rounded, rather isolated protostylid on the permanent P;-M, of specimen no. 2, and by a small ectostylid on the vestibular aspect of most of the milk teeth. The tendency is found to be constant among all Hipparion. The stated degree of development of these structures does not seem to be particularly ‘African’: it is certainly surpassed by some Eurasiatic species, for example, H. koenigswaldi from Teruel. Of course, it should not be overlooked that the feature seems to have been expressed rather weakly in Merychippus times. The minor development that it shows in the Upper Miocene of Algeria may hardly be considered ‘African’ when compared with the Stylohipparion of the ‘Villa- franchian’. However, the feature suggests a rather strong and precise evolutionary trend at work. Hypsodonty: H. africanum is stated to be poorly hypsodont. The indices are by no means comparable to the ‘African’ specimens of the Pliocene and Pleistocene times, and they are of the same magnitude as the other Hipparion groups of the Mediterranean basin. H. africanum is even less hypsodont than H. sitifense which is stated to have low teeth. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 339 PLIOCENE Mascara A palate with an almost complete dentition and a symphysial region with incisors, probably belonging to the same skull, have recently been described by Arambourg (1956). This Pliocene form is characterized by very small dimensions of the teeth (table 8), which also show few and simple plications and little hypsodonty. The protocone, completely independent of the protoloph right to the base of the crown, is relatively compressed. The specimens have been referred to H. sitifense Pomel with which they are stated to share ‘almost identical morphological features and size’. pe Ps p4 Mt?! M? M3 P2—Ms 1. MASCARA A-P length dee 3 $1.30 20°5 20 1995) 19 18°8 129 Transv. breadth .. oe tars i Se We 28) 20 19°5 16 18-6 Crown height 7 ve Peewee OD 20"% ~ TO"F 55 13 Protocone length .. i4 ees FY Bak Gag 74 8:8 Protocone breadth .. - Re OT ae ae 3 Protocone shape .. ay 60 55 55 46 34 Protocone length/Tooth fone abe eel!) R4. 41 33 38 46 2. ST. ARNAUD CEMETERY H. sitifense (type specimen) A-P length ie - “a 23 Transv. breadth... a fi 22°5 3. AIN EL HADJ BABA R L A-P length ays — di 225,20" 2), 20 20°2 Transv. breadth .. co ts 21 20°5 21 20°3 Protocone length .. Ef ne G2 6 ahs Dail 3 Protocone breadth .. xi me ma) iA. Br 7s Protocone shape .. Le 51°6 66°6 52-2 47°5 Protocone length/Tooth fength Bi 27a QOEF Be" “aio TABLE 8. Summary of measurements (mm.) of teeth of North African Pliocene Hipparion. St. Arnaud Cemetery The type specimens of H. sitifensis (sic) Pomel 1897 were recovered from the St. Arnaud Cemetery. These two upper teeth, figured by Pomel (see also Arambourg, 1956) are little hypsodont and rather small (although not quite as small as the Mascara teeth). A broken calcaneum is also mentioned. Lower teeth of a correspondingly small size and medium hypsodonty, collected by Arambourg but as yet undescribed, have no ectostylid. Ain el Hadj Baba Upper isolated, but partially serial right (?) P4-M?, a left M?, lower teeth, and limb bones were described by Thomas (1884) who referred them to H. gracile (Kaup). 340 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM However, according to Arambourg (1956), the narrow and small number of plications of the enamel, the double pli caballin, features of the protocone, dimensions of the upper teeth and absence of the ectostylid on the lower teeth, make the Ain el Hadj Baba specimens very similar to H. silifense types and co-types, as well as to the Mascara specimens. Therefore he considered them to be A. sitifense. From the metapodial, it may be observed that the lateral digits were still very strongly developed. Utique (Northern Tunisia) This area also includes the continental sands of the Ferryville region near Bizerta (fig. 4). Solignac (1927) indicated that the fragmented remains had been assigned by Depéret to H. crassum Gervais, but Arambourg (1956) is inclined to refer them to Stylohipparion. St. Donat (Algeria) Teeth of two maxillae, which Arambourg (1956) interprets as being possibly referable to H. sitifense, were found at this site. Joly (1909) recognized further teeth from this site and hastily referred them to H. gracile, but they should probably be compared with Arambourg’s 1956 material and pooled with A. sztifense. PLEISTOCENE North Africa Oran: The teeth recovered by Pomel in the Oran area are among the first discoveries of Hipparion in Africa and formed the basis of the first description. Two sites were mentioned: (i) ‘St. Pierre sandstone quarry, on the property of Mr. Brunie, in the St. Charles district, in the east quarter of Oran, which is also the type locality of Libytherium maurusium.’ Two lower teeth were described by Pomel (1897) as the type specimens of EHipparion (?) libycum. The one, a left P; or P,, has an ectostylid while the other is without an ectostylid, but the antero-external region is broken. The specimens were successively referred, first by Van Hoepen (1932) to Stylohipparion steytlert because of its similarity to P,; (Nas. Mus. C795) from Cornelia (vide infra, p. 347) ; then by Joleaud (1933) to Libyhipparion libycum because of its fundamental similarity to the du Bourg de Bozas Mission material from Omo, although it is more elongated and somewhat larger; and later by Arambourg (1947, 1956) to Stylohipparion libycum (or albertense). A distal portion of a third metatarsal was also recovered from this deposit. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 341 (ii) Puits Kharouby. Five upper molars were described by Pomel (1897) and referred to H. massoesylium. However, Pomel himself was not too sure whether or not these upper teeth belonged to those lower teeth which he had described under the name Hipparion (?) libycum. Their reciprocal kinship was ascertained by Joleaud (1933) who consequently referred H. massoesylium to his Libyhipparion libycum, and by Arambourg (1947, 1956), who for the same reason, placed them in Stylohipparion libycum (or albertense). Ain fourdel (Constantine): The material consists of a M, and a lower premolar, the additional stylids of which seem to have been overlooked by Thomas (1884) who referred them to Hipparion gracile. Joleaud (1933) emphasized their similarity to Pomel’s Oran specimens and to the material discovered in the Orange Free State of South Africa. He proposed that the Ain Jourdel material should be placed in a new species Stylohipparion (?) thomas. Arambourg (1947) can see no reason for not pooling Ain Jourdel (one of the two teeth at least) and ‘H. massoesylium’ (= Joleaud’s Libyhipparion libycum) with Stylohipparion libycum. Beni Foudda (Constantine) : This site has been referred to as Ain Boucherit by Arambourg. A molar recovered here was attributed by Pomel (1897) to Hipparion ambiguum but was referred by Arambourg (1947, 1956) to Stylohipparion libycum (or albertense). Wadi Natrun (Gart el Moluk Hill): Andrews (1902) described a left upper premolar (?P*) of large dimensions (A—-P 29 mm.; transv. breadth 28 mm.), but apparently it is little hypsodont (height 38 mm.). However, it is a rather warn specimen. When the specimen was discovered, very few African Hipparion had been recovered, and the typical features of the few that had been recovered were still largely unknown or as such unrecognized. The best comparative material at that time was that from Oran: the enamel pattern of the specimen from Wadi Natrun appeared definitely more complex and it differed in the absence of isolation of its hypostyle. Therefore, in spite of its transversely more com- pressed protocone, which explicitly suggested some close resemblance to Hitpparion theobaldi (from the Siwaliks), the specimen was referred to the more widespread H. gracile. After the discovery of further material from Omo and Kaiso, Joleaud (1933) emphasized the difference in the parastyle and mesostyle features from Libyhipparion ethiopicum, and he stressed the resemblance with the Kaiso speci- men, referring to it the Wadi Natrun premolar, which he called Hipparion cf. albertensis (sic). 342 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Central Africa Koro Toro: The Hipparion material recovered from the ‘Villafranchian’ horizon of the Tchad has been provisionally referred by Coppens (1960) to Stylohipparion. He is preparing a detailed description of these specimens, together with the associated fauna. Therefore, it is not possible to comment on this material at this stage. East Africa Omo: The first specimens were recovered by the du Bourg de Bozas Mission (1903) and were described by Joleaud (1933). They consist of a few isolated teeth, namely: I incisor; 5 lower cheek teeth (1 right premolar, one left M3, two left molars and one right molar) ; 1 fragmented upper right molar. To this group Arambourg (1947) added a left M?! or M?, first interpreted by Joleaud as Hippotigris. A second series of specimens was recovered by Arambourg (1947) during his 1932-33 expedition, and comprises 1 right P?; 1 left M%; 1 fragmented right upper molar and 1 right M, or Mg. The first of these groups was described by Joleaud (1933) who erected the new genus and species Libyhipparion ethiopicum,’ generically distinct from the South African specimens from Namaqualand and Cornelia on the one hand, as well as from the Constantine material of Thomas, on the other, and specifically separated from Pomel’s St. Charles teeth. In a later reconsideration of these Omo specimens, to which the second series of teeth from the same area was added, Arambourg (1947) rather empha- sized (a) the close relationships between all the Ethiopian hipparionids; and (b) their profound similarity to the East African (Kaiso, Serengeti pro parte, and probably Olduvai) material and the Orange Free State discoveries. Furthermore, Arambourg considered it reasonable to refer most of Pomel’s and Thomas’ North African (St. Charles, Puits Kharouby and the Constantine) material to S. albertense or possibly to S. libycum. The characteristic features common to these specimens are: (i) pronounced hypsodonty reaching 80 mm. in unworn teeth; (ii) upper molars with very complicated enamel pattern and laterally compressed and strongly elliptical protocone; (iii) lower teeth with strongly developed additional stylids, rather large oval or flattened and pointed ectostylid; (iv) the presence of a ptychostylid; and (v) ridged or pillar-like protostylid and well-built entostylid. (1) With exception of left upper molar, considered by Joleaud as belonging to Eguus (Hippotigris). i : " HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 343 Therefore, there are no reasons for proposing any generic or specific distinctions between these Pleistocene African Hipparion, which according to the priority rules have been referred to Stylohipparion albertense. Olduvai: Some of the first fossils identified in the Olduvai Gorge, when it was first discovered by Kattwinkel in 1911, were the distal ends of 3 metatarsals of hipparionids, which Hopwood (1937) referred to Stylohipparion cf. albertense (Hopwood). The dimensions of the lower articulations of metatarsal III were 40 x 30 mm. The broken metatarsal IJ] and metatarsal IV are stated to have had ‘originally’ almost the same lengths as metatarsal III, and to have had the appearance of broadening distally. Further specimens of teeth, recovered by Kattwinkel and Reck in 1913, as well as an upper dental series collected by the British expedition, were ' referred to the same genus and species. The diagnosis proposed by Hopwood (1937) for this Stylohipparion cf. albertense is: Three-toed equid, with high-crowned molars of the Hipparion group. Lower teeth are laterally compressed and display a strong, often laminated ectostylid. Genotype: Stylohipparion hipkint Van Hoepen (1932). Unpublished data In recent years a large collection of equid material has been recovered from the Olduvai Gorge by Dr. L. S. B. Leakey. All the specimens from Bed II (and a few from Marsabit Road, Olorgesailie and Omo) are now being studied by Dr. R. A. Stirton in California. Dr. Leakey kindly permitted the authors to make a brief survey of this material. In order not to encroach on the final description, only a few features relevant to this paper are mentioned: (i) In this mixed sample there are 471 Equus teeth, of which 224 are from the upper dentition. Of the 186 teeth of hipparionids, 100 are upper. The vast majority of these are from Bed II, only a few deriving from other sites. (ii) This is then a reasonable sampling to ascertain the expected propor- tions of upper and lower teeth. It will be indicated below that at Langebaanweg there are approximately equivalent proportions of uppers and lowers, but at the latter site there are almost no Equus specimens. (i11) The data is also useful to assess the situation at South Serengeti (vide infra). In this respect it is interesting to note that in the Olduvai collection, among the lower teeth, those of hipparionids have elong- gated, strongly marked ectostylids, typical of Stylohipparion, while those without ectostylids lack the typical features of Hipparion as well as the protostylids of the Langebaanweg specimens. They are typically Equus in type. 344 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM (iv) There is a great range of variation in the size of these Hipparion teeth, and also in the length and shape of the protocone. On the whole, the range seems smaller than that of the Langebaanweg teeth, but the protocone is more elongated. In the Hipparion lower (as well as in these Equus) teeth, there is a complete absence of protostylids and hypostylids. South Serengeti: A large collection of Hipparion has been made from various localities in the South Serengeti, and was described by Dietrich (1942). A complete list has never been published. However, from the available data, it is possible to ascertain that the collection consists mostly of isolated and frag- mented specimens, a few maxillary and mandibular fragments (among which are symphysial portions with incisors), many loose upper and lower teeth, both milk and permanent. There are also some rare postcranial specimens, namely, a proximal fragment of a femur, a distal fragment of a tibia, two third metatarsals, one third metacarpal and tarsals. Dietrich artificially reassembled the isolated teeth into series, and most of the dental series figured in his publication are reconstructed. From the scattered data and illustrations, it is possible to establish an incomplete list of the South Serengeti dental material (table 9). Plate Number in Description Origin and Coll. Number Dietrich (1942) Milk Dentition Upper r dP2-dP4 Vo 330 XIII 96 r dP2-dP3 Gadj 10 XIII 97 1 dP2-dP4 Gadj 2.39 XX 162 Lower r dP2-dP4 Vo 313 XIII 93b r dP3-dP4 Marambu XIII oga r dP4 Gadj 10-13.3.39 XIII 94 Permanent Upper | P2—-M3 Vo, Gar. XIII 87 1 M2-Mg .. Vo 670 XIV 102 1 Po-M3°*.. Vo 330, Vo 670 XV 107, 108 1 P2-P4 Vo 670 XX 160 r Po-M3 .. Vo, Gar. XIII 88 r M2-Mg3 .. Vo 670 and Marumba XIV 103 Lower 1 M3-Pe2 Vo 313, 670 XV 106 1 P2-M3 Der., Gadj., Gar., Vo XV 105 1 Pe—-M3 Vo, Gar. XIV to1 1 Pe—-M3 Vo 330, Vo 670 XIII 90 1 Mr Garussi 2.39 XIV 99 1M Gar. River 200 XIII 95 r M3-P2 Vo 670, Gar., Olduvai Hill XVI 109 r P2—-M3 Vogel River XIII 89 r P2-M3 Vo 670, Gar., Vo XIII g1 r P3—-M3 Gadj 10 XIII 92 Symphysial region with incisors Vogel River 9-10-38 XVI 112 TaBLeE 9. Hipparion material mentioned by Dietrich (1942) and derived from South Serengeti region HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 345 In contrast to the relatively unchanged nature of the postcranial skeleton (vide infra) since Pliocene times, the advanced and progressive features of the dentition of the South Serengeti hipparionids have been emphasized by Dietrich. The teeth, both upper and lower, are strongly hypsodont (crown length: g cm.). The upper molars show numerous enamel plications, and an elon- gated, ungrooved protocone, completely isolated right down to the base of the crown, and embedded in a thick cement layer. The incisors (see p. 350) are longitudinally grooved on their anterior surface (in one case I, is missing). It does not seem possible to distinguish different forms of hipparionids at Serengeti on the basis of the upper teeth. On the contrary the lower teeth show some constant features whereby it seems possible to distinguish two groups.* A large group of teeth, all apparently recovered from the gray tuffs, does not show any additional stylids while another group of some 50 (40 isolated teeth and 2 incomplete dentitions) displays the ectostylids characteristic of most of the African hipparionids then described. In these teeth the ectostylids are sometimes very strongly developed, pillar-shaped or flattened and ridged. Protostylids and hypostylids are also regularly present, and a very peculiar entostylid (see p. 360) may be observed on one tooth (Garussi River 200, fig. 95 of Dietrich, 1942). ‘These teeth derive from deposits that seem to span over a longer period of time than do those from which the teeth without stylids were recovered: some of them probably occur in the gray tuffs, contemporaneously with the first group, while others belong to a probably younger horizon. However, as has been stated previously, the stratigraphy of the South Serengeti is very poorly documented. Other than the presence of the stylids and the average shorter total length of the dental series at a comparable stage of wear (156 mm. v. 170 mm.), there seem to be no appreciable differences between the two groups. However, the value that can be attached to the assessment of the total length of the dental series in these specimens is doubtful because (a) of the ‘reconstruction’ of most of Dietrich’s series, and (b) of the variation of the total length due to wear. In spite of the above distinction, Dietrich does not consider it necessary to separate generically the South Serengeti material. ‘This attitude is reasonable because (1) lack of knowledge of a stratigraphical sequence rules out a clear chronological sequence; (2) too little was known of the skeleton, both cranial and postcranial ; (3) the upper teeth showed no features whereby they could be separated into two groups, and yet it is a statistical probability that, if there were two species at the site, all the uppers could not have belonged only io one of these species; and furthermore, (4) the development of the ectostylids, ranging from absence through mild formation to strong development, is an expression of dental adaptation to environmental factors (vide infra, p. 352). 1 See also discussion on Arambourg’s concept of the non-validity of Hypsohipparion, p. 333. 6 346 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM On the basis of the data available then,! Dietrich considered that within the Serengeti material there was an original and conservative African stock of hipparionids for which he erected a new genus Hypsohipparion Dietrich, 1942, with Hipparion albertense (Hopwood) from the Lake Albert Kaiso bone beds as the type specimen. Into this genus and species he placed the Serengeti material without stylids, as well as all the upper teeth and the postcranial remains. ‘The diagnosis that he proposed was: An advanced three-toed, short-snouted Hipparion of the dimensions of a small caballus, the M?® of which reaches a crown height of g cm. The protocone shows a tendency to become laminated, non-grooved and com- pletely isolated from the protoconule. Teeth show no reduction of the main cusps and styles. Plications are more marked than in all Pliocene species. Lower teeth (deciduous premolars, permanent premolars and molars) are (?)? all without ectostylids. Dietrich believed that the group manifesting the stylids was displaying the developmental trend of a selective pattern. He provisionally placed this group in Stylohipparion as a practical measure, partially comparable to Stylo- hipparion libycum, Stylohipparion ethiopicum, and Stylohipparion steytler1. However, he maintained that the generic labelling had no strict taxonomic value because of the scarcity of the material on which this was based. He did not see the value of assigning his material to a new species. Arambourg (1947) questioned the validity of the generic status of Hypso- hipparion on the basis of a possible incorrect determination of what he considered to be lower zebrine teeth (see p. 333). In later publications (especially 1956 and 1959) he seems to have definitely adopted this view permanently. In his opinion the Serengeti material belongs partly to Stylohipparion and partly to E. zebra. This opinion is discussed and considered unacceptable elsewhere in this paper. Lake Eyasi: The few isolated teeth recovered from the Lake Eyasi shore (west and north of Mumba Hill) are very much rolled and unsuitable for any detailed study (vide supra, p. 287). They were referred to Hipparion sp. (Reck and Kohl-Larsen, 1936). Lake Albert (Uganda): From the east shore of the Lake, one incomplete upper molar (B.M.N.H. M12615) was described by Hopwood (1926) as the holotype of Hipparion albertensis (sic). The tooth is rather hypsodont, with a complicated enamel pattern. Its antero-posterior diameter is 24-5 mm. Dietrich (1942) used it as the genotype of his new genus Hypsohipparion albertense, the proposed diagnosis of which is noted above. South Africa Namaqualand (Cape Province): Nine isolated mandibular teeth of the same jaw, left P,-M, and M, and right P,-M, and M, (fragmentary) were 1 Through the kind collaboration of Dr. K. H. Fischer, Berlin, measurements of some of the ‘Hypsohipparion’ teeth were made available to the authors: see table 20. 2 Dietrich includes this ‘query’ in his original diagnosis in German (p. 97). ee HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 347 described by Haughton (1932), who erected a new genus and species WNoto- hipparion namaquense. ‘The type specimen is S.A.M. 9982. Unfortunately a diagnosis was not provided. A small ectostylid and a protostylid are occasionally present. It is difficult to comment on the height and relative hypsodonty of these teeth because the crown is rather low, as the specimens are in a very advanced stage of wear (table 10). The teeth possess a thick cement. Cooke (1950) proposed a diagnosis for the genus Notohipparion Haughton: ‘rather low-crowned, heavily cemented hypsodont lower cheek teeth with an extra antero-external cingulum fold or column, either isolated or fused with the parastylid, present in all the permanent cheek teeth except the second pre-molar, and a deep groove separating the strongly developed metaconid and metastylid. The upper dentition is unknown’. Because of the moderate hypsodonty and the weak development of additional stylids, Dietrich (1942) considers Notohipparion to be more primitive than Stylohipparion. This opinion had also been held by Van Hoepen (1932). Arambourg (1947) compared these lower molars with the ‘single’ African Pleistocene genus Stylohipparion but, probably because of the poor stratigraphy, he did not revise its taxonomic status. In later comments on the African Hipparion, he (1959) makes no further mention of these specimens. P, Bs P, M, M, M, A-P Length .. a big doi 20°5 27°0 26-0 ora) 24°0 29°0 Transv. breadth " a oto @ 17°0O 17°0 16:0 14°5 12°5 Height .. Be + ih AS Ohi I7°5 25°0 23°0 30°0 34.°0 Transv. breadth/A-—P length seat, "§aaee 63 65°4 69°6 60° 4 43 _ Height/A-P length .. As ms, AO?2 64°8 96°11 +100 125 Ty Hypsodonty Index .. Ay bie, LO 97 67°9 69°5 48° 2 36°8 TABLE 10. Measurements (mm.) of teeth of ‘Notohipparion namaquense’ Haughton Christiana (Cape Province): From this site an upper second (? third) left molar (Archaeol. Surv. 113), considerably worn, undescribed and not illus- trated, has been referred to Stylohipparion steytleri by Cooke (1950). Transvaal australopithecine cave breccias: ‘Two lower teeth, recovered by Broom in the breccia filling the Kromdraai Cave, have been referred to Stylohipparion steytleri (Cooke, 1950). Hipparion teeth recovered from Bolt’s Farm and Makapansgat Limeworks have been similarly referred (Cooke, 1963). These specimens have not been described. Cornelia (Uitzoek): Eleven isolated upper and lower teeth include a group of five and another group of two teeth belonging to single individuals (table 11): (i) one right M! or M? (Nas. Mus. C558), one left M® (C555), one left M,-—M, (C556),1 described by Van Hoepen (1930) as a new species 1 In the original publication (1930), C556 was stated to be composed of lower milk teeth (DM, and DM,), and only in 1932 were they correctly acknowledged as permanent teeth. 348 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fiipparion steytleri, the type being C558 and the paratypes being 0555-550. (i1) A series of five left lower teeth P;-M, (C795), recovered from the type locality, were referred by Van Hoepen (1932) to the same species. (ii) A right M, (C797), in very early wear and therefore displaying a completely uncharacteristic pattern, was used by Van Hoepen (1932) to erect a new genus, namely, Stylohipparion, and a new species hipkini, to which a left P, (C796), recovered from the same locality and formation, was provisionally referred. Van Hoepen (1932) subsequently referred steytleri to the new genus Stylo- hipparion. He considered Stylohipparion to be ‘obviously the terminal stage of the evolutionary line which originated from Hipparion with Notohipparion.’ Joleaud (1933), who compared steytlert, with Libyhipparion ethiopicum, and hipkint with the Ain Jourdel specimen of Thomas, accepted the specific distinc- tion between séeytlert and hipkini. Cooke (1950) considered this distinction to be invalid. This opinion is strongly supported here, for both a priori and a posteriori reasons: first of all, no upper teeth of hipkini have been recovered, and Van Hoepen’s species is based on one single lower tooth (C797), which constitutes a very inadequate basis for creating a new taxonomic unit. Furthermore, the tooth is in a very early stage of wear, which is the case of the obviously atypical, peculiar pattern of its occlusal surface. Thus the ‘difference’ between it and the Stylohipparion steytlert is not at a species level. Van Hoepen provisionally referred specimen C796 to the new species, but it is even less different from the known steytleri specimen. In any event, being a P,, it does not show the typical features of a species. On the other hand, and quite apart from this question of a specific distinc- tion, the genus Stylohipparion Van Hoepen has been generally accepted by all subsequent authors. Hopwood (1932), Dietrich (1942), Arambourg (1947, 19560, 1959), Cooke (1950) and Gromova (1952), among others, have considered Stylohipparion as a valid unit (at least at a subgenus level), which expresses the ‘African’ trend of Pleistocene hipparionids. The following diagnoses have been proposed : Arambourg (1947): ‘“Tridactyl equid, with very hypsodont dentition. Upper molars with compressed protocone of very elliptical section, wavy parastyle; especially complicated enamel pattern, particularly around the prefossette. Lower molars with broadly developed ectostylid, laterally compressed, and close to the antero-external hypoconid pillar.’ (Direct translation from the French.) Cooke (1950): ‘High-crowned rather hypsodont lower cheek teeth with a strongly developed isolated pillar external to the ectostylid, possess- ing no external groove between hypoconid and hypoconulid, having no protoconid and hypoconid and small rather widely separated metaconid HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 349 and metastylid. High-crowned upper cheek teeth with isolated oval protocone and possessing a small flange on the antero-internal side of the parastyle.’ We wish to point out that the ‘ectostylid’ referred to by Cooke is actually the ptychostylid, while the ‘strongly developed isolated pillar’ is the ectostylid. UPPER TEETH St. steytlert (van Hoepen) M! or M? M? (C558) (C555) A-P length A 22°O 21°0 Transv. breadth .. 22°0 18-0 Height .. 4 54°0 66-0 St. steytleri St. steytleri St. hipkini LOWER TEETH P; P, M, M, M, M, M, BS (C795) (C556) (C797) (C796) me Acneth § .: 25°0 28:0 22°O 24°5 — 21°O 28°5 31°O Transv. breadth 15°0 12°O 12-0 EL 5 12°O 12°5 15°0 14°5 Height .. ie 04°70 74°0 69:0 7a™6 2270 41°O 81-0 46°0 TABLE 11. Dimensions (mm.) of teeth of ‘Stylohipparion’ from the Orange Free State, South Africa. From Uitzoek also comes an anterior portion of a lower jaw (Nas. Mus. C679), containing four large first and second incisors, which are flattened anteriorly and arranged almost in a straight line. Each incisor shows the ‘mark’ or the cement-filled depression in the enamel. The third incisor is small and lies behind and in contact with the second incisor. The above description (Cooke, 1950) is a slightly modified interpretation (also suggested by L. H. Wells) of the original description by Van Hoepen (1930), made, according to Cooke, so as to avoid the ‘startling supposition’ of the complete absence of the third incisor. However, it should be pointed out that specimen GADJ. 10 from South Serengeti shows complete absence of not only I;, but also of the canines (Dietrich, 1942). One of the special features of this specimen C679, besides the reduction (? complete, i.e. absence) of I,, is that the lingual aspect of I, and of I, has two surfaces, meeting at an angulated thick ridge. Each surface also has longitudinal parallel ‘costae’. A new genus and species Eurygnathohippus cornelianus van Hoepen (1930) was created to include the above material. No measurements were published, but from the illustrations and the cast it is clear that the jaw fragment belongs to a very large skull. Dietrich (1942)(1) made the suggestion that this mandibular symphysial 1 Dietrich incorrectly describes the specimen as belonging to a milk dentition (‘Milch- vordergebiss’, p. 97). 59° ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM region (for which no cheek teeth are known), should belong to Stylohipparion, or at least to the advanced Hipparion of the Cornelia layers. Ewer (1963) refers to Eurygnathohippus as a chalicothere. The basis for this opinion is not clear to the authors. NOTE ON Hipparion INCISORS Eipparion incisors have rarely been discovered in Africa. In a recent, comprehensive study of a large assemblage of Hipparion material from South Aragon, Sondaar (1961) indicates a similar shortage there. The small number of recorded specimens from Africa are: (1) Upper incisors: the H. africanum type specimen (no. 141) from Oued el Hammam presents a complete snout, and, from the same site, there are also three maxillae with incisors. They have been described by Arambourg (1959) without comment, because there is no comparative material. (11) Lower incisors : (a) (5) (¢) The Libyhipparion ethiopicum (Joleaud, 1933) collection from the Omo Valley contained one incisor (vide supra, p. 342). Dietrich (1942) mentions some incisors from the South Serengeti without going into any detailed description (vide supra, p. 344). Eurygnathohippus cornelianus (Van Hoepen, 1930): an anterior portion of a lower jaw. This may belong to an individual of the genus Hipparion or Stylohipparion, as has been suggested already by Dietrich (1942) and in a personal communication (1964) from Dr. L. S. B. Leakey (who bases his view on material recently discovered at Olduvai).* Each of these specimens raises difficult problems, which cannot be solved until more complete material becomes available. A few of these problems are: (1) The ‘Libyhipparion’ incisor does not show the sub-elliptical section of Hipparion. It is completely subdivided into two clearly separated ‘marks’, no other example of which is known among Hipparion in the literature. It has been suggested that this feature is an extreme mani- festation of the enamel plications, typical of the African hipparionids. It is impossible to state whether or not the feature is really exceptional. It is not demonstrable in the other few available incisors. Eurygnathohippus : The ‘costae’ and the blunt ridge on each specimen are unique in this small. series. A possible explanation for these features is that they are adaptations to browsing and strengthen the teeth, set practically parallel to the horizontal symphysis. The occasional reduction (? absence) of the third incisor is referred to above. 1 Confirmed while in press. See Leakey, L.S.B.: Olduvai Gorge 1951-1961, 1. p. 26. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 351 A SUMMARY OF PUBLISHED POSTCRANIAL REMAINS OF AFRICAN Hipparion The postcranial skeleton of African hipparionids is very poorly known. The only described specimens are: | Camp Berteaux: A femur fragment with the proximal epiphysis. Oued el Hammam : Distal fragment of humerus (no. 159) ; radio-ulna (no. 123) and fragments 13, 22 and 27; femur without epiphysis and a distal fragment; distal fragment of tibia; pelvic fragment; two astragali; one calcaneum; five metacarpals and five metatarsals, many with lateral digits. Ain el Hadj Baba: Metapodials with lateral digits. Oran: One fragmentary calcaneum and one third metatarsal. Omo: Right humerus. Olduvai : Distal end of three metatarsals. There are also quite a number of undescribed specimens. The authors examined a number of such specimens recently collected at Olduvai Gorge. Data on the metapodials is provided below. South Serengeti: Proximal fragment of a femur; distal fragment of tibia; two metatarsals III; one metacarpal III; tarsals. Arambourg (1949) has probably described the largest collection known from one site: it consists mainly of numerous complete metapodials (many of them with lateral digits) which have been referred to Hipparion africanum. From the description and the measurements, this North African Upper Miocene Hipparion seems to have been about the same size as the smallest H. mediterraneum of Pikermi. The extremities indicate that africanum was rather short and heavily built. The lateral digits were more robust and strongly developed than those of most other hipparionids, and they certainly were still functional. From the Pliocene, only a few metapodials with very well developed lateral digits are known from Ain el Hadj Baba. They have not been adequately studied. It has been assumed that they belong to H. sitifense. From the Pleistocene of East Africa a right humerus is known from Omo, and a few fragmentary long bones and metapodials have been recovered at Olduvai and South Serengeti. The material has not been described. Size and morphology of the metatarsals do not seem to differ noticeably from H. gracile. Dietrich (1942, p. 101) states that the South Serengeti metatarsal III ‘must Breadth, distal end A—P diameter, distal end Olduvai (Hopwood 1937) .. sh 40 30 South Serengeti (Dietrich 1942) .. 37 35 H. elegans... i, ne Ae 29°6 25°71 H. moldavicum of a a 33°9 26°8 Hi. mediterraneum nr 4 ps 32°3 TABLE 12. Dimensions (mm.) of metatarsal III of Hipparion 352 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM have a length similar to H. gracile, i.e. 23-24 cm.’ The lower articulating surface is 37 mm. broad and 35 mm. A-P, so that it is only possible to state that the distal end is broader and thicker than in most of the European Hipparion (table 12). The lateral metapodials reach almost to the distal articulating facet and are rather strongly developed, but it is not possible to state firmly whether or not they possessed three phalanges. Nothing is known about the front extremities at present. The only species with similar dimensions of the lower end of metatarsal III is A. longipes with 40 and 33 mm. for the breadth and A—P dimensions respectively. H. africanum has a distal breadth of 34:7 mm. It is difficult to assess whether these greater dimensions of the East African Pleistocene forms are indicative of larger overall dimensions of the animal, or whether they only refer to more massive metapodials. Although there is no direct correllation between the different structures, it may be mentioned that the larger size of some of the South Serengeti molars may suggest that the first possibility is not excluded. In general, too, Pleistocene mammals tend toward giantism. On the basis of published material, it was not known whether or not the African Pleistocene hipparionids were three-toed horses. There is some informa- tion concerning the existence of metatarsal II and metatarsal IV at Olduvai, of which it is stated that ‘they originally had practically the same length as metatarsal III and that they are broadening distally’ (Hopwood, 1937). However, no phalanges are mentioned. Unpublished data Examination of the Hipparion third metapodials from Olduvai Bed II, now in Berkeley, California, reveals conclusively that the lateral digits were robust, reached the distal ends of the metapodials, and were as well developed as those of Hipparion from Pikermi. The metapodials II and IV are not repre- sented by complete specimens or by the distal articular end. Measurements of the fragments are considered to be of no value. Despite the lack of complete lateral digits, the evidence of the articular grooves formed by them on the third metapodials convincingly indicates that the East African Hipparion were three-toed. Furthermore the data suggests that they possessed slightly longer, but more massive, limbs than the Pikermi Hipparion (see also p. 363). Table 13 indicates the dimensions of the available third metapodials from Bed II, compared with two specimens from Pikermi. It appears that the African hipparionids have hardly modified their locomotor apparatus since the Pliocene. THE ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS OF Hipparion Considerable plasticity exists in biological organisms. Factors such as climate (with such variations as in temperature and humidity) considerably affect water supply, food, animal and plant associations and the actual nature of the environment, e.g. savanna, sand dunes, forests. The range of an intra- ti ie HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 353 Proximal Distal Metacarpal III Total Proximal breadth Distal breadth length A-P (max.) A-P (max.) 1957. SHK II 935* .. 217 36 46 33 42 F. 3457 2: 206 37 44 34 245 1955. BK II 45 - 229 37 >45 36 48 MEAN . 215 37 45 34 45 Pikermi UC63402** 206 31 40 29 38 Metatarsal III 1957- SHK II 557* 253 38 48 35 45 1957- SHK II 729/730 260 37 47 36 45 1955. BK II 68 iA 257 40 46 35 45 1953. BK Il . 242 37 45 34. 44 wan7. otk Il 1177 .. 254 — — a3 >42 fgg. DK AL663 .. —_ 41 46 — oe mons. BK ILig, .. — a — 38 48 neat, © 1 F 797 ae — — — 32 43 MEAN bad 253 38°6 46°4 36 44°7 Pikermi UC63415** .. 241 37 45 33 40 * These appear to belong to one individual. ** University of California, Berkeley (Dept. of Paleontology). + There is a unilateral pathological growth at the distal end. TABLE 13. Dimensions (mm.) of third metapodials of Hipparion from Olduvai Bed II. All the specimens, except the two labelled ‘Pikermi’, are from Olduvai. species variation may be considerable and will allow extensive pliability in adaptation to changing environmental conditions. Such modifications may not change the genetic background or consequently, the taxonomic status. In comparing different anatomical patterns, this concept must be borne in mind. On the other hand, it is also obvious that the environment may favour, either the greater adaptive potential of some individuals in a particular popula- tion or mutations, so that selective forces may operate to promote different races and eventually a new species. Therefore, in a survey of a biological group which extends over a vast continent, it is essential to appreciate the plasticity of the organism. Such a study has been successfully developed for the family Equidae, and the hipparionids in particular, because of the vast amount of available fossil material, both in America and in Eurasia. Following other scholars, Gromova (1952), in her revision of the genus Hipparion, has emphasized its variability and evolutionary trends in relation to ecological factors. The aims of this section are (a) to summarize the main conclusions about the ecological and functional significance of Hipparion characteristics; (b) to summarize the available information concerning the African biotopes occupied by Hipparion from Upper Miocene to Pleistocene times; and (c) to draw possible conclusions about the migrations and evolution of African Hipparion under the influence of these bionomical circumstances, 354 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM and thereby to contribute to the appreciation of the taxonomic status of the African groups. ECOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HIPPARION FEATURES The overall dimensions of the Hipparion skeleton do not allow definite conclu- sions about the biotope. It is known that the smallest races of extant Equidae are to be found in the driest areas characterized by drier food and, in the northern part of their dispersion, in areas of poor economic conditions. It is probable that similar factors have influenced the Hipparion-associated fauna, and that their general dimensions illustrate in some way the nature of the biotope. However, larger and smaller forms (? species) have repeatedly been recovered from the same deposit so that it appears that they co-existed in the same climate, but they may have occupied, within the same area, slightly different ecological niches. On the other hand, this is not a general rule because exceptions have been documented. For example, at Pavlodar (on the right bank of the Yrtych, Moldavia, U.S.S.R.) where it was possible to make inde- pendent studies of the nature of the biotope at different ecological stations, a species characterized by longer and more slender extremities and reduced lateral digits, viz. H. longipes, lived in a drier habitat than the shorter-limbed H. elegans did. Therefore, it is not possible to make any direct inferences about the biotope from a mere consideration of the overall dimensions of the animal. Various factors are probably involved which cannot be adequately isolated. Relative dimensions of cheek teeth and incisors seem to be largely influenced by the quality of the food: a drier, more steppe-type grass usually develops larger teeth. However, the incisors and the cheek teeth may show differing reactions and adaptability to this ecological feature. This has been demonstrated by comparing species presenting large cheek teeth with species having small cheek teeth, e.g. H. gratum and H. longipes, which show comparable incisors. The relative size of the teeth in proportion to the overall dimensions of the animal must also be considered, a smaller animal normally having relatively larger teeth. The development of the preorbital fossa, which has become an important taxonomic consideration, is in the present state of our knowledge not related to any ecological feature. Animals with large and with small preorbital fossae are found together in the same xerophytic (H. proboscideum and H. matthew, at Samos) and moist habitats (H. moldavicum at Taraklia, or H. theobaldi in the Siwaliks). Preorbital fossae may even be missing (H. platygenys at Taraklia) without any apparent ecological reason. The isolated protocone, completely detached from the protoloph and the protoconule right down to the base of the crown, is a constant feature of the hipparionids. It obviously weakens the structure of the tooth. This has to be compensated for, especially in the case of a hard and dry grass diet, by a greater development of the cement in the anterior and the posterior valleys so as to bind and strengthen these individual elements (Stirton, 1931). ee ee eee Ce ee ee oe ee ee Oe ee a ee ee ee HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 355 Two elements are involved in shaping the protocone: antero-posterior length and transverse breadth. It is known that, relative to the total dimension of the tooth, the A—P length of the protocone is more constant than its transverse breadth. Therefore, a protocone may look elongated, but this is only a reflection of its narrowness. Thus it is advisable to express the functioning structure of the protocone by means of two indices: 3 (a) the protocone length is expressed relative to the general mesiodistal measurement of the tooth, i.e. the ‘length index’. (6) ‘The so-called ‘shape index’ expresses the length of the protocone relative to its breadth (table 14; figs. 12, 193). These indices highlight the differences in adaptation between the African and Eurasiatic Hipparion. | The two indices for the African forms are compared to those for 7 Eurasiatic Hipparion species. Available measurements of the total dental series have been utilized. It may be noted from figure 12 that the length index of the African Hipparion is constantly higher for each tooth than that of the corresponding tooth of any of the Eurasiatic species. However, in both groups the length index tends to increase in a mesiodistal direction. On the contrary, the shape index (fig. 13) is constantly lower for the African forms, decreasing for both African and Eurasiatic groups in a mesiodistal direction. Thus it may be concluded from the two indices that the protocone of the African Hipparion is both relatively longer (elongated) and narrower than in the Eurasiatic forms. The shape of the protocone varies with progressive wear, the section tending to become more oval and less elongated. But independently of these modifications, for particular locations in the dental series at comparable levels of attrition, there seems to be also an adaptive elongation or broadening of the protocone which is linked with the type of food it has to deal with. It is suggested that the efficiency of the protocone’s function in trituration lies in the action of its buccal and lingual enamel crests, developed perpendicularly to the lateral chewing movements of the mandible. It is obvious that the efficiency is maximal for a narrow and elongated protocone, for here the crests are at one and the same time the longest and the most perpendicular. Thus they would favour a dry and harder bunch grass. This suggestion is strengthened by the contemporaneity of the lengthening of the protocone and the development of a typical xerophytic vegetation in America. Enamel plications It has been successfully demonstrated that the complexity of the enamel pattern on the occlusal surface of Hipparion molars has developed synchronously with the drier environment in Upper Miocene and Pliocene times. Like the elongated protocone, the numerous enamel plications are oriented perpendicu- larly to the movement of the jaws, and are increasing the triturating power of the teeth for coping with harder grass. Although there seems to be a parallel increase in the degree of plications with increasing toughness of food, there = ~ a Q ~ = Z < < 0% = < rm BR =) ° mn = a a ea ° mM ~ < Z Z < 356 e Xopuy odeyg puv xopuy yuo] ou0s0}01g “PI aTavy, *Yq90} UIOM AJ9}V1IPOUL IO 9]I}1], 10} ‘1961 ‘xeepUog UOJ paye[NoTed 10 ‘0, BuIpsOIDy » *6G61 “eAoWoIy Wor poye[No[ed 10 ‘0} Sutpz0.y p ‘9S61 “sinoquiviy Woy poie[NoTeo 10 ‘0 Sutp1090V 5 ‘6S61 ‘Sinoquiviy wos; poyepNoyed 10 ‘oj SuIpI0Y gq ‘YyySua] 9U0I0}01d 0} DAT}LIII YIPBIIq 2U0I0}0Id = (‘['g) xopuy adeysg "YISUZ] YIOO 0} ANVIL YSU] UODOj0Id = ("[""J) XOpUy YISUIT » bG | G.g | V.Sh | 1.8 | : UBOUI [etouss) °9 >4}90] UIOM Ajoyei1spoul IO 9]}71] JOJ URIUI “Gg :UOTJVLIVA JO BSueIl “D *2W 40 TN id ‘ed VE ov | 6.26 gé aN aN 10 TN gt B& | 9-97 | 9-28 aN oa) 6& | G.oG | 4.16 IN td 10 ed GG Iv | &.0E | 9.07 vd 09 VS | o-&v | &-GE eck 1 ZS | &-¥Q | 9-&% sd 6.9F 1.G6 G.6r | £.0& | g-09 | &-4a | &-19 | 6.9% | B-Qg | G-gQa | 6.z%g | 1-gz | &-09 | 6.4% | 1.9G | €.0€ 9-QF z.GE 6.gS-4F.9§ | 9.Gh-G.gz 6.LP | o.s& | b.sG | 1.6% | 9.05 1§ | G.&9 | L.Lz | 9.6% | -o€ | 1.L£7 | 9.PS | g.0G Gg 6.LP 9& G.27 | 1.45 | o-LG | 9-92 gS | £.La | L.¥9g | a-gz 1-09 o& LG | &.2¢ 6°19 | 9-18 6.697 PPS 1.1G | 3.08 | S.%9 gz | 9-¥9 | z-9% | 6.99 | 3. Fz 9-09 | £.Gz | &.66 | F.gz 5-39 Qs g.t9 | 9.bz a-LG | 6.%% o£ | 1-0¢ | G-09 | &-38 | 9°zg | £.0a | G.gG | 6.15 | 3-GQ | 16 | &.66 | 9.6 BF bi at ws St ES ie ESS et Sat al 1S. TI SSeS SSL glpjvass1uaoy guunuvnsforsag plungiappjoul SaMupvgasuvT dae gasuapnguod "FT | ,avaowoLs “FT ey: pstuasdqolg "YY oEyi psunsaja “H gasuafigis “Fy | qunuvaifo “F HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 357 H. africanum © H. sitifense : Hypsohipparion : Langebaanweg | . elegans H. moldavicum . platygenys : . periafricanum: . gromovae . concudense : . koenigswaldi : Fic. 12. Protocone length index in the various teeth of African and non-African Hipparion species. 3 58 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM e@ H. africanum m H. sitifense Hypsohipparion Langebaanweg . elegans . moldavicum . platygenys . periafricanum . gromovae . concudense - koenigswaldi dpoepono px LB Fic. 13. Protocone shape index in the various teeth of African and non-African Hipparion species. Sa a. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 359 must be a limit to the former. The quantity of available enamel is fairly constant and probably limited, so that an increase in the complex pattern of the enamel will result in a thinning out of the plications. Eventually this would produce too weak a support for the triturating pressure required for hard grass. When this point is reached, the plications again reduce in number and the protocone lengthens. as a compensatory mechanism. Therefore, it is not always possible to ascertain from the small number of plications whether they represent a primitive condition corresponding to a humid environment, or whether they are secondary, resulting from a reduction under the influence of a hard grass food. Then other factors must be considered, e.g. the shape of the protocone, to solve the problem. A directly comparable situation is encountered in the development of proboscidean teeth. Here an increase in the available grinding surface of the enamel ridges (lamellae) could represent the increasing plications in the teeth of the Equidae, especially as they are also oriented perpendicular to the grinding movement. This parallelism is also demonstrated in the hypsodonty of these two groups. Hypsodonty In the evolution of the Equidae most lines show a constant increase in the crown height of the cheek teeth. However, from Merychippus, in Miocene times, the progressive hypsodonty has advanced along two phyletic lines (Hipparion and Pliohippus) at a faster tempo, again under the influence of a general increase in aridity. The same observation has been made among Bovidae. It seems obvious that it is once more an adaptive response of the organism to the xerophytization of the diet. The dietary changes involved in the evolution of Cenozoic hypsodont horses probably corresponded to a shift from browsing on softer herbaceous plants to grazing on harsh, siliceous grasses, which acted as abrasive agents on the teeth. These changes are, in turn, a consequence of an increasing aridity as has been clearly demonstrated for the Great Plains of America (Stirton, 1947). The association of widespread sandy deposits and of bunch grass of the Stepidium type, with the increasing aridity of this area is actually known to be contempo- rary with the development of hypsodonty from Lower Miocene times onward. This increased height of the crown has played an important role as a protective modification in, the dentition. It is supposed, although impossible to prove from the fossil record, that a mutation or other factors, favoured an increase in activity of the odontoblasts and ameloblasts to lay down more dentine and enamel when the tooth was still in the formative stage. The root closure (fusion) may have been considerably retarded as well. Furthermore, it may be suggested that dry climate has influenced the teeth by necessitating some protective mechanism not only because of the harsh conditions of the grass, but also because of the sand mixed with it as a foreign substance. Stirton (1947) states that in the Great Plains area, a close inspection reveals much sand adhering 360 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM to grass or lodged in between blades and stems, where it is blown by wind or splashed after thunder showers. The double knot in the lower cheek teeth of the hipparionids displays three typical features: (a) a primitive ‘stenonis’ type, inherited from Merychippus and generally — retained throughout the evolutionary sequence among American species; (b) a more progressive, typical ‘Hipparion’ type has been developed by most European forms; and (c) the ‘caballus’ type which was lately acquired, particularly in African representatives. It has been suggested that the double knot of the lower teeth was shaped and typified under the influence of the protocone structure in the upper teeth, with which it is functionally linked in occlusion. There is good reason for developing a long, narrow metastylid parallel to an elongated, elliptical protocone, as is found in most African Hipparion. Here, the shape of the metasty- lid in particular, and consequently of the whole knot, conveys useful information about diet and climate. However, the correlation is probably not a simple one, because American Hipparion display an elongated protocone and a rounded - ‘stenonis’ type of metastylid simultaneously. Total tooth structure Upper teeth are rather compact. The outer enamel forms a fairly con- tinuous and parallelipipedic structure, only grooved slightly by a small hypo- glyph. The only weak structure which can be broken away from the tooth under excessive strain is the protocone, separated from the rest of the tooth by the internal depression. In the Langebaanweg material, this plane of fracture is noted in Lg35, Lo42, Lo45, Lo56, S.A.M.11722 and S.A.M.11724 (pls. 1, 7, 8, 9g). It has been noted above that, with increasing dryness of the food, this weakness is largely corrected by the development of a narrow protocone closely adherent to the protoloph. Lower teeth, on the other hand, are built on a very different pattern. The many conids and stylids are much more individualized: they are contig- uous but are separated from each other by rather deep depressions right down to the base of the crown. These intervals are filled with cement, but it is softer than the enamel and does not always supply sufficient compensatory protection, as can be seen in many fossil teeth where the cement has disappeared. In drier environments, the hard food influences this structure of the lower teeth, demanding additional strengthening of the enamel-dentine pillars which are embedded in their cement coating to prevent both fracturing and excessive wear of the tooth. Support can be provided in two ways, either (i) by reducing the depth of the internal and external depressions separating protoconid from hypoconid, metaconid from metastylid, and metastylid © from entoconid, or (ii) by additional stylids. HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 361 Reduction of the depth of the depressions is commonly observed. As has been stated previously, this occurs on the lingual surface by the development of a ‘caballus’ type of double knot, while on the buccal surface it is secured by a broader connection between the two halves of the ectolophid. The alternate solution lies in the construction of additional pillars: ectostylid and ptychostylid in particular, just in front of the external depression, and protostylid and hypostylid on the antero- and postero-external corners. Entostylids are occasionally developed in the postero-internal depression. In one particular case (a ‘Stylohipparion’ Gar. Fluss no. 200, figured by Dietrich, 1942, pl. XIII, fig. 95), a strong additional pillar is seen between metastylid and metaconid. The higher frequency of these additional pillars in milk teeth seems to have been necessitated by the lowness of the crown of these teeth and their softer construction. This is the obvious way to prevent too rapid attrition which cannot be compensated as there is no continuous growth of the tooth. As suggested previously, enamel plications, shape and size of protocone, structure of the double knot, increased hypsodonty and additional pillars are many different methods of meeting the mechanical requirements of a tougher diet. They do not all necessarily develop together at a parallel tempo. Some of them are functionally linked but other elements develop compensatory roles so that all need not be present at one time. Therefore, no single element can give reliable information about climate, biotope and the quality of food, but an assessment of the whole picture and of the reciprocal values of the different features must be considered. The extremities Duerst (1926) has successfully demonstrated how a humid climate and a soft grass develop a heavier type of equid with broader extremities (eurysome type), while a leptosome type of a smaller, more slender animal with more gracile extremities tends to be built in drier biotopes characterized by a xerophyte vegetation. This seems to apply especially to metapodials which become relatively longer. The progressive reduction in size and the disappearance of the lateral digits in equids, with the concentration of the whole body weight on the third metapodial, has always been interpreted as an adaptation to increasing speed in steppe surroundings. It has been repeatedly suggested that the high tempo of evolution of Pliohippus towards monodactyly is an expression of its drier habi- tats, while the lateral digits of African Hipparion are kept more or less functional right into the Pleistocene, probably because of a more humid environment. THE UPPER MIOCENE AND PLEISTOCENE BIOTOPES OCCUPIED BY AFRICAN HIPPARIONIDS Our knowledge concerning past climates and biotopical conditions in those areas where African hipparionids have been recovered is still inadequate. 7 . 362 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM The fragmentary information spans over a very long period of time (probably 10-12 million years) and is derived from a large continent where the climates have certainly been variable. Consequently it is not always possible to draw accurate conclusions from the collected data, nor is it possible often to correlate data from one site with those of another. Furthermore, this information is deduced from fossil assemblages of which some are listed on the basis of debatable fragments, while others are wrongly identified. For example, at Olduvai Gorge, recent and more extensive collections will permit a better analysis. Even where there is sufficient and accurately identified material, it should be remembered that a fossil specimen is not necessarily found in the typical habitat of the living form. It is well known that in periods of drought or volcanic eruptions (which have played such an important role in the Ceno- zoic sedimentation of East Africa, from Omo to Eyasi), animals have concen- trated around swamps, temporary pools and tuffs, possibly fairly distant from their normal biotope. This biotope is often less restricted than one imagines, and the adaptation of some organisms is quite fantastic. So, it seems futile to draw definite conclu- sions from the presence of one or even a few animals. Real associations must be considered to avoid misinterpretation of the presence of a species at a particular site. (a) In the Upper Miocene, the Oued el Hammam faunal assemblage contained Palaeotragus, Samotherium, Damalavus, Gazella, Dicerorhinus, Hippopota- mus and Hyaena. With slight generic differences, it corresponds very closely to the fauna of the East African plateau of today, and indicates the typical savanna with mimosa biotope of the tropics. According to Arambourg (1959), the presence of Macaca and Cephalophus in the contemporaneous deposit at Marceau suggests the proximity of forests. This is supported by the location of the deposit in a higher and already tilted portion of the Tellian Atlas, and by the lignite abundant in the deposit. (6) The Lower and Middle Pleistocene faunal assemblages of the East African Hipparion-bearing sites clearly indicate the same type of steppe or plain and highland (mimosa) savanna environment, very similar to that of the present day, ‘with a marked bias toward somewhat moister conditions in most cases’ (Cooke, 1963). The main feature at Omo, Kaiso, Kanam, Olduvai I-IV and Eyasi is undoubtedly that of an open savanna. No true forest associa- tion is to be found in these areas, although forest strips and moist woodland occurred occasionally, as is indicated, for example, by the presence of Wesotragus moschatus. The cyclical and seasonal variation of the rainfall has provided more humid conditions at times, and consequently the development of swamps and (or) lakes in the lowlands, with very luxurious vegetation, are responsible for the abundant Suidae, Bovidae, Giraffidae, Elephantidae and Equidae. A swampy environment is explicitly suggested at Olduvai by Aonyx, and at Omo by Kobus. A lake shore or grassland adjacent to water is evident both at HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 363 Omo and Olduvai (e.g. Hippopotamus, Omochoerus) where this is also reflected by the nature of the deposit. The presence of Oryx and Beatragus hunteri would suggest arid conditions prevailing in the locality. Although most of the fauna are suggestive of plains or a plateau, Tragelaphus nakuae and Dzinopithecus brumpti indicate that a mountainous biotope was probably part of the picture at Omo. (c) In South Africa, forest and desert associations are similarly absent, and the prevailing feature remains that of a steppe or a savanna fauna. The Vaal River Gravels suggest a fauna of thornbush and grassland. The cave breccia—probably less representative of a true biocoenose—contains both open plains and dense bush-dwelling forms. It is believed that the rainfall varied considerably during the Pleistocene, with oscillations from 20% to 40% annually (Brain, 1958). The fossil forms represented there would have tolerated such changes. In any case, even in the driest conditions (Taung) well-watered bush valleys could be located at not great distances. In conclusion, it may be stated in broad terms, that African Upper Miocene and Pleistocene Hipparion sites seem to have been areas of (dry to) moist savanna and grass steppe, or of open woodland with mixed savanna. It is not possible to define with any more precision the environment proper to Mipparion in this general biotope which extended over half of Africa for several million years. It is probable that local circumstances and features have directed the relationships and balance of the various species in particular areas: but as a whole, and in spite of replacement of species, the African fauna has maintained an essentially constant composition throughout late Cenozoic times, which indicates that the broad ecological pattern did not vary greatly from the Upper Miocene onwards. The main ecological feature, viz., the savanna, may at times have been extensively altered by moister climates producing swampy conditions and even patches of forest. Then later, it would be altered again by a rather low rainfall. Nevertheless, drastic changes probably never occurred. There seems little evidence of a true forest fauna or of conditions too dry to sustain a normal steppe biocoenose (Cooke, 1963). EFFECTS OF BIONOMICAL CONDITIONS ON THE EVOLUTION AND THE MIGRATION OF AFRICAN HIPPARIONIDS It has been generally accepted that the three-toed hypsodont Hipparion were typical steppe forms. The savanna biotope is commonly emphasized as an important equid environment of the late Tertiary in the Great Basin of the United States, and the vast reduction of this habitat is strongly suggested as a Suitable explanation for the extinction of Hipparion by the end of the Hemp- hillian (Shotwell, 1961). The life span of Hipparion in North America, namely, Clarendonian-Hemphillian, corresponds rather precisely to the extension of the savanna or steppe biotopes in this area. The recent observations of Sondaar (1961) strengthen this view: at Nombrevilla, in Spain, where Decennatherium, 364. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Aceratherium and Mastodon were recovered together with Hipparion, there is — good evidence for a steppe environment. However, it has become clear that fipparion is not restricted to such narrow ecological conditions. Thenius (1950) interprets H. gracile as a forest-dwelling form, and Kurtén (1952), on the basis of the Chinese ‘Pontian’ fauna, enforced the necessity of a reconsideration — of this hypothesis. Because of the almost identical frequency (13°) of Hipparion in both the gaudryi and dorcadoides faunas, characteristic, respectively, of the ‘forested’ or ‘southern’, and of the ‘steppe’ or ‘northern’ provinces (the classical distinction of Schlosser, 1903), it was suggested that the Chinese Hipparion thrived in various surroundings, or at least that the genus as such was not exclusively a steppe form. Furthermore, it is not possible to make a direct correlation between the geographical distribution of a particular species and its biotope. Of the eleven different species recorded by Sefve (1927), some are confined to one locality and others turn up in widely different areas; in some instances, up to four different species have been recorded from the same fossil pocket. The adaptability of hipparionids explains their extraordinary diffusion both in North America and in the ancient world, from Upper Miocene times © onwards. Ecological conditions influenced structural features in different and — varying ways, often difficult to explain. A similar geographical distribution and even the simultaneous presence of different fossil forms in one particular pocket are compatible with slightly different cles niches or habitats in a small vicinity. Under favourable conditions, observations have often been made of the association of more massive animals (with larger skull, shorter limbs, longer lateral digits and strongly plicated enamel) with open forested areas, character- ized by soft and wet ground and tender vegetation. Lighter forms (with slender and elongated limbs, reduced lateral digits and simpler enamel pattern, elongated and narrow protocone and increasing hypsodonty) are found in a more xerophytic environment. Outside Africa, H. primigenium, theobaldt, crassum are representatives of the former group; H. elegans, longipes, moldavicum, proboscideum, matthew are typical of the latter. In general, the various characteristics observed in the African Hipparion are Clearly indicative of animals adapted to a rather xerophytic steppe environ- ment, although this never seems to have been very severe, and was certainly not constant everywhere. It has been stated above that nowhere in Africa are Hipparion-bearing sites located in true desert areas, and none of the forms recovered shows the extreme leptosome type displayed by some North American forms, e.g. H. whitneyi. Hipparion africanum, with its large skull, short and massive limbs with lateral digits well developed, and rather less hypsodont teeth, is probably, from the inadequate data available, the least adapted to a steppe environment. However, the enamel plications and the narrow protocone show an orientation in that direction. It is difficult to assess whether this moderate expression of > — 7 2 eee Bid See so es QIz L.Gz v.ov VII Q-P L.3& g-SL v.11 9-8 L.GG I-QI 6.9% 9-29 "OUT T 2 oor | Gaba z.6G €.3 6.4 6.66 6.99 9-01 ere 6.96 1.G1 C.9z ¢.0S "+ 666 7 = Gol 6 .0& 89 F.g L.G ¢.66 TL §.11 8 L.¥9 ¢.gI Q-Qz z-Lb = VS6r7] a S91 C.PS €.PS z-6 G 9-9f € .og £6 g-L 1.&9 L.gt C.gz ¢.9P 266 'T < Fiz 17 z-OV Vg g- II 6.6 L.&G fete 6.6% L.s9 gr6 T fs Qos t 1-66 1-16 se 1-O1 Q-2S GI V.Qz P.¥9 vV6 ‘J Ss SA 10 TW < er | ee | ee ee | —— | fe a €&z Lv 1-39 o-VI 8-9 €.9S €.91 of oL vSghi 'T 5 giz P.&P b.€9 6<€1 oe a z-9S Q-gI aS 69 vIGPI TJ pa L.g1 Goa Zz gi €.SP b.Log Z-S1 6.9 3-19 g-Li 1.62 €+EG OO | fe) o&% ¢.ab ¢.Lg rom G.o1 t.%9 Z-QI € .gz C9 - €F6 7 5 gos 1.&P G.gl 6.z1 i. Oi ob Z-Ql 6.62 €.z9 =O. oh A, LE6 J :*q 10 *g Au Ce |S eT | ed ee a Oe eae) meee eR, Le | Sc EY 8 || ane eee | ere es | SP ee Re Re A ee en He ee a g-GS1 Z-QI oS aSgVi ‘JT g-9I 6.41 “(666.77 Ez + .gh g-9S 3-91 3-6 L.oS Li G.&€ 1-1P Lbo 7 “a (uo1 SU] | yorssordop yisu2} (pruoje} | -oafo1d) YOOL _|-ysod yj8ue'T] SE ih | oe eT) —__—____ uorssoadap | uorssoadap : Suey wpesiq | yySuaz, | jo yypeorq| -3sod uorssordap | ‘yur ysod | -yur-que |_%8U9T Wy S104 ‘xe =| “yBueyT yue‘ySusT] “WIBueT | “yIueT | yIpeorg | yIpPvorg | yISueT | UMOID | ela ag i il i 4 Le 372 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM It can always be observed as a prominent ridge along the mesio-buccal border of the tooth. It is constantly present on P,—P,, and always present on M,—M,. 11. Entostylid: One entostylid has been observed (Lg46) in the entoflexid on the bucco-mesial aspect of the entoconid. It presents as a distinct flattened enamel island (pl. 8). 12. Talonid: Bilobed. Upper permanent dentition Material: PF or P*: Left: L934, L936, Lo42, L1463, 114678.) ee ee (ols; To, 5, 7): Right: Lo55, L1467c, S.A.M.11722, S.A.M.11724 (pls. I, 3, 7> Q). M! or M?: = Left: Lo45, L953, Lo58, L1467B, L1467p, L1467Hn, ».A.M.11719 (pls: 3,4, OF Right: Lg40/950, L951, L956, L1459 (pls. 1, 2, 4). M*: Right: L935 (pl. 9). ? premolar: Left: S.A.M.11723 (embedded in plaster for sectioning). Cheek teeth: ?: L1785 (fragment). The following specimens probably belong to single individuals: 1. Lo35, S.A.M.11722, S.A.M.11724. ia a7o) oe inter 7 To: . L942, L945, Lo56. . Lg40/Lg950, Lg51. - L934, L953, L955, L1459. . L14678, L1467c, L1467p, L1467E. DM oO B CO ND A completely unworn tooth, L1467A, recovered from the same site as L1467B-E and H (viz. Baard’s Quarry), does not present the typical features of hipparionids. It shows the same type of fossilization as the other L1467 specimens, but, because of its exceptional dimensions (ca. 32 X 28 mm.), it is provisionally excluded. The teeth are classified according to their degree of wear as follows: (a) completely unworn or just erupting: S.A.M.11716. (b) early wear: L1463, S.A.M.11719. (c) moderate wear: L935, Lo40/950, Lo42, Lo45, Lo51, Lo56, L1467B-£, SA Vito) SAME IT eA, (d) advanced wear: L934, L936, L953, L955, L958, L1459, L1467H. a HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE General dimensions (mm.) of P?—M?: 1. A-P length: range of variation: 21-8-30°5 Mean: 26-6 2. ‘Transverse breadth: range of variation: 23°5-30°3 Mean: 26-9 3. Breadth/length index: range of variation: go-7—-111°4 4. Hypsodonty: Means All P?—-M? Unworn teeth Early wear Moderate wear Mean: 99°1 Absolute crown height (mm) 49°7 70 63-69:2 51°8 * The ratio between crown height and breadth. Hypsodonty Index* (%) 49°6 36-4 42°3 51°6 373 Height/length Index (%) 193 249 233 201 To indicate the relationships between the Langebaanweg dimensions and those of other African Hipparion, the following data has been extracted from table 18 and summarized (table 19): A-P length Transv. breadth .. Breadth/length Height (unworn and early wear) .. i sie Hypsodonty index (un- worn and early wear) Height/length index (un- worn and early wear) .. Hi. africanum AH. sitifense 19-23 18—22°5 23-27 20° 5-26 97°2 48—60 38° 3-41°3 223-240 “f1ypsohipparion’ albertense (South Serengeti) 25-31 24°5-29°5 95°1 70 249 Langebaanweg 26°6 26°9 99"I 67°4 39°3 238 TABLE 19. Comparison of dimensions (mm.) of Langebaanweg upper teeth with summary of data of other African Hipparion. From these figures, it is clear that the Langebaanweg Hipparion has hypsodont upper teeth, but this hypsodonty has not reached the same degree as it has in the South Serengeti specimens. Description of selected individual teeth: Two specimens, an unworn left premolar (S.A.M.11716) and a left M? or M? (S.A.M.11719) in early wear, have been selected for detailed *yi90} JUoUeULIOd soddn Samuveqosur’y] jo (‘wruI) suoisusWIC] “gI ATAaVv,], €gI at 61 Lzz 6bz ICI Ogi bos o61 Qzz 6S Chi gol 9g! OSS ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM | 6.4¢ b.SE 1.6% v.v 3-6 3-QOl 0-96 g- bE 6.6% L.v 9-6 €.96 9 -6F 1.G6 6.9F 9-F €.6 1.66 €.aP 9 -6& b.9& 4 II L.S6 F.9f L.sP L.1b G oI L.06 G.gz L£.1G g-P €.6 o-QS C.2€ L.bb o-P v.6 6.Fo1 1.2S 6.16 g-L¢ g-P £38 F.go1 g-oS of g-SG c 6 1.96 €.9F G.LE 6.9P v.P 6 6.g01 L.92 ¢.oS a. €.g oS ¢.1§ oS g-& g-L 101 zOI g-Lor €-g9 9& oS G OI z-96 €.z9 9-SP €.LP z.G II v.11 9-9P €.GE €.6¢ g-F 6 Lo L.LY v v.g 6.9S g-V OeL £.99 € .66 o-Qv oS g-O1 ZOl ; ae (xopur yjSuo'] =) cere odeys=) | yIpeorq yy Sud] yi8u9] = quoposdAFy{ yiSuay yI00 J, yISus{/yIpesi1q | sU0I0}0I1g | 9U0D0}01g heath 9U090}01g YjSUsT 9U090}01g 1.9% 6.Lz 6.9% 9-96 C.Gz €.o& B-Qz 8-8 19a §.z C.Sz GeLs 8:96 Sale wpeorg b.Gz L «gz 9 -9% 1 -Qz g-Lz 1 «QZ C.0€ 6.9% C.gz of vz 6.9% 1-VS Q-1% o-VS g-Lz 1.3% Cc .Gz L.Gz z-6% yisus'T 88h : g+1S ‘ L.6v : — bG : 1S £9 o- . aN 0} WH *YyI99,.T, eed dl Goeca uvoyy "a 09 8g “MIO, jenprarpuy = jo uv “ “* UBvsp, [B1oua+) ' salii‘wy's 61411 J gIZI1 ‘Wy's HLoFI J alovi J aLoti ‘J oLovi TJ aLori T tori J 6SF1 J gS6 J 9S6 J S67 656 J 16-7 cr6 J ov6 J 0S/or6 J 9&6 J] C66 J bE6 J HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 375 description. They display the characteristic features of the other Langebaan- weg specimens. ‘The typical features of the whole group will be outlined below (see p. 376). S.A.M.11716 (pl. 5) A left P4, unworn. Occlusal surface: Paracone and metacone are V-shaped and they are curved towards the medial side. The protoconule and metaconule are less angulated than the lateral cone and tend to curve less towards the medial side. The paracone and the metacone tend to overhang the fossettes. Protocone: ‘The cement is split off near the apex of the tooth. It is lozenge- shaped, completely isolated and the apex tends to curve in a buccal direction. Shape: The tooth has medium hypsodonty. It has a gentle convexity from root to apex in a lingual direction. The styles stand out as clear costae, forming deep hollows between them. One-third of the distance from the occlusal surface, the hypoglyph becomes increasingly deep so that in the upper half of the tooth the hypocone becomes well demarcated. Appearance of the tooth, sectioned just above the middle : The halves of the ectoloph are deep and arc-shaped with a slight angularity at the mesostyle. The parastyle is prominent. Most of the prominence is taken up by the lateral angle which is rounded. The surface, flattened but with a slight groove, is markedly oblique and almost in the same plane as the anterior (mesial) surface of the tooth. The mesostyle is prominent, and, because its rounded surface is flanged, it overlaps the buccal depressions on both sides. The metastyle is very slight (almost negligible), its rounded ridge decreasing in prominence from the occlusal surface to the root. The protocone is slightly elongated and oval. Completely separated from the protoconule. The protoconule is a flattened arc, angulating fairly sharply toward the pli caballin. The hypocone is elongated posteriorly, rather flattened. There is no tendency to isolation. There is a deep V-shaped hypoglyph, and the hypostyle is angulated. The pli caballin is bifid, the posterior process just touching the protocone. The prefossette: There are plications which are so deep and complex that the centre of the prefossette is very narrowed and reduced. The anterior wall is plicated and the antero-lateral angle is knob-shaped, tending to be separated from the prefossette. The pli protoloph is deep and narrow, touching the very deep and narrow pli protoconule so that the medial portion of the prefossette is an almost isolated triangle. The plications on the posterior part of the pre- 376 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM fossette are very deep and complex. One of the more medial ones tends to flange out to form an almost isolated irregular pillar just lateral to the base of the pli caballin and wedged between the most medial part of the prefossette and postfossette. The postfossette: ‘The plications on the anterior wall are also deep and complicated but not as numerous as on the posterior wall of the prefossette. The pli postfossette is deep and irregular-shaped, almost touching the base of the pli hypostyle, thus tending to isolate an oval portion of the medial part of the postfossette. Just lateral to the pli postfossette, the plications tend to isolate a small rounded pillar. S.A.M.11719 (pl. 3) A left M? or M?. It is slightly higher crowned than S.A.M.11716, and slightly less curved. Half of the ectoloph: The paracone is deep and quadrangular-shaped, angulated at the mesostyle and parastyle. The parastyle is prominent and narrow. The sides tend to be parallel, slightly widening at the base. ‘ The metastyle is partly broken. It forms a slight ridge. The protocone is elongated, oval and angulated anteriorly and posteriorly. It is completely isolated. . The protoconule forms a broad flattened arc, slightly angulated toward the pli caballin. 4 The pli caballin tends to be duplicated with the anterior tongue longer and — almost touching the protocone. The hypocone is rather short, tending to be separated from the metaconule. There is a very deep hypoglyph that is very broad-mouthed. The prefossette: There are a few anterior plications, continuous with a deep narrow pli protoloph which tends to isolate the medial wall of the fossette. The pli protoconule is shallow. The plications tend to be absent. However, — the original plications have become isolated to form an irregular circular — island (prefossette loop) just lateral to the pli caballin and wedged between ~ medial parts of the pre- and postfossette. The postfossette: The plications tend to be worn away but it can be seen ~ that they were complex anteriorly. The pli postfossette is very deep and touching ~ the medial wall of the metacone. The pli hypostyle is deep, angulated and — wide, and it has almost isolated the medial part of the postfossette. | Typical features of the upper teeth: 1. Protocone: The characteristic isolated protocone of Hipparion is observed — in all the complete molars mentioned above. On L935, Lo42, L945, Lo56, — S.A.M.11722 and S.A.M.11724, as well as on L1785, the lingual portion of — the tooth has been broken away along the pre- and postprotoconal grooves and ~ HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 377 does not allow any observations of the protocone. However, there is no reason to suppose that the protocone in these teeth displayed different features, and it is as umed that the description proposed for the other teeth applies to these specimens as well. The protocone is elongated in a mesiodistal direction, and clearly shows angulation in those teeth not worn or in early stages of wear. It becomes more elliptical or oval in the later stages of attrition. Thus the shape index (breadth/ length) varies from 36-4 to 58-9, with an absolute mean of 48-9 for all the teeth and an average of 48-3 for those teeth which have not reached an advanced stage of wear (table 14). The length index ranges from 42-7 to 28-7, with a mean of 35:1 for all the teeth, of 34-7 for teeth in early wear, and of 35-7 for those in advanced wear. This smaller range of variation indicates that the actual length of the protocone does not change as much with wear as does the breadth, and that the apparent elongation of the protocone of the unworn teeth is more due to its narrowness than to its actual length. Thus it is clear that the Langebaanweg specimens display this typical feature of African hipparionids (see p. 355). In so far as the few available speci- mens in varying stages of attrition from other African sites permit comparison, there seems to be a great similarity in the shape and dimensions of the protocone between H. africanum and the Langebaanweg Hipparion. The ‘African’ character is even more strongly expressed in ‘Hypsohipparion’ albertense (tables 14, 20; figs. 12, 13). 2. The hypocone is commonly angulated, tending to isolate in early wear. Later it becomes more rounded, and the isolation from the metaloph is no longer discernible, the anterior groove tending to disappear. Parallel variations in the shape of the hypoglyph are observed with progressive attrition. 3. The marks are constantly closed. 4. The plications are numerous, profound and often bifurcated, especially in early or moderate stages of wear (e.g. S.A.M.11716, Lg40/950, Lg51). The enamel pattern is most complex on the posterior wall of the prefossette and on the anterior wall of the postfossette. The plications have been counted according to the method suggested by Gromova (1952), and the average plication formula for the Langebaanweg specimens has been established: Kee at 505) (075-5) — (On) (1-2) There is a constant isolation of a prefossette loop in the lingual-distal angle of the prefossette, being bilobed and large in early stages of wear, and rather triangular and arrow-shaped in advanced wear (e.g. specimens L934, L951, S.A.M.11716; best example is the latter on pl. 5). The pli caballin is constant, often double, in early and moderate stages of wear. It is not observed in very advanced wear. In all these features there is not a clear basis of distinction between the 8 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 378 6.0 heavy Cr 6.0F &-QV C.cP (xoput odeys=) YSU] 9U0D0}01g Ypeeiq 9u0d0}01g “bob ‘19yosty “EE “SY “Aq Aq poveorunururos syusWoINsvapy “YoSusIIg yINOG wo (6g-9g ‘ssy ‘TITTX 291q¥) ‘eh61) YyoeIGq asuazsagzpo .uorunddiyosdy, JO yy99} Wopurs jo (‘wWUr) suoIsUDUIIG] ‘0% ATAV,], V.LP P.GP 6.E7 g-&V C.EP L.¥E (xepur yisus] =) ySus] YI00, J, Y}SUIT 9U0I0}01g ES [SS | | ES | P Gait v Grit G ree G Lae 9 o-SI 9 g-S1 yypessq yisu9] QU0I0}01g | 9U090}01g yysuo'T OPO re Cr gI ¢.gI C.1S Geet ¢c.cr Vs cries Lo C .6z C.Lz = 66 wpeorg G.gz Lo La G.ga C .6% 6& Cave Gs Gale 1g 1g 6& yysusT ee ee V d ee ae € d a HLAXYL AWHMOT ae ZW WN rd ed zd. HLaaL Widdn HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 379 Langebaanweg material and the ‘Hypsohipparion’ upper teeth from Serengeti, the plication formula of which is found to be very similar: (0-4-5) —(2-5) — (0-3) —(o-2) (0-3) POSTCRANIAL EQUID REMAINS At Langebaanweg seven phalanges have been recovered. Because of their equid structure it could not be excluded a prior: that they belonged to Hipparion represented by the dental remains at the sites. It must be pointed out that a few teeth of Equus (to be described in another publication) have been recovered at these sites. However, they only constitute 10% of the total number of equid remains collected thus far. Consequently, because of the lack of comparable Hipparion remains from Africa, the Langebaanweg specimens are hesitantly included in this paper, more as a documentation for comparison by others than a positive contribution to the reconstruction of the Hipparion limb. Material: First phalanges: L1456, L1462a, L1462B, L1462c (pls. 10, 11). Second phalanges: L1449, L1462p (pl. 12). Third phalanges: L1444 (pl. 13). All the absolute dimensions namely, length, diameter of the proximal and distal ends and of the median shaft are usually considerably larger than those (after Gromova, 1952) of the three species of Hipparion compared, i.e. elegans, moldavicum and longipes (table 21). There is virtually no overlap between the two series, although the highest figures for H. longipes (the largest of the three species) are sometimes very close to the lowest figures for Langebaanweg (table 22). Sondaar (1961) mentions one first phalanx of the forelimb third digit with an exceptional length of 69:8 mm. In Europe the highest mean is known from Eppelsheim, H. primigenium, with a length of 64-3 mm. and a proximal extremity breadth of 41-3 mm. A comparison of the dimensions of the proximal end of the first phalanges from Langebaanweg with the breadth of the distal extremity of metatarsal ITI from Olduvai and South Serengeti (tables 12, 13) makes it obvious that the Langebaanweg specimens require a much broader metatarsal for articulation. For H. longipes the respective breadths of the distal end of metatarsal III and the proximal end of the first phalanx are 40 mm. and 42 mm. The mean distal breadth of the known specimens of metatarsal III from East Africa is 44:7, the maximum being 48 mm., the widths of the proximal end of the first phalanx at Langebaanweg are 50-56 mm. Therefore, either the Langebaanweg specimens belong to a slightly more massive limb of an Hipparion or else they belong to Equus. Compared with Equus zebra and burchelli, the Langebaanweg specimens are larger in a number of dimensions, but there is a greater amount of overlapping *(6661) eaoworr) Woy poye[Ndyed JO ‘o} Burps0o9Y q *(cS61) eaowtorn WOT poye[No[ed 10 ‘01 BuIpIODV » *(4yjayoung pue vigaz) snnby ueowyy uslopour pue (suvow) uowndgizy oneIseing™ yim poiedurod sauoq quit Samureqo8ur'y] oy} jo (uur) suOISUSWAICT ‘13 W1avy, rr cs ¢.L6 For 3.6 6§ C.1P C.PE G.ad 3.S9 all 6z gs La oO! Lor | 9-¥6 = oF 8 cE a 6z 6% C.gz > CrI Cir II! = gh gh Iv 4 bE C.a& o§ o oF oF LE 4 ey < q = L.GP L.aP 9& 2 aS aS G.Lz g ZS oS 1d a LG ¥.€S g-0S fs oF ov L& Oo mn 4 = ol babs List Zz oS Vv.&P L.GP * GE | G.zE Zé €.1L v9 C.09 oS QP bv o£ CL o£ oOo! LE z-oL Lz For ¢.g& L.Gz L.br1 C.sP ¢.6z LS rae xopul v/9 Weys Yipeoiq “UIP, “4 Be xopul W/A pus [eisIp “WeIp q-V ‘7 = xopuy V/7 Pus [eISIP YIpeoig “| pus ‘xoid ‘weip g-y ‘q Be xopul y/D pus ‘xoid yipeoig “5 (uvIpout) ‘Jans yue ySusT “g < Yysus] WNUITxeyy * LIOIG GUIHL ‘Il XNVIVHd xopuy W/D uUvIpsU “jyeys yIpeoIg “yD pus [eisIp “wWeIp qd-V “A ee xopuy V/F pues [eIsip YIpesig “| “+ << Syanis ‘oie “xoid ‘wep g-Vv ‘q = = xepul g/O = xopuy W/D pus *xoid ‘wep g-y ‘y xopuy v/a puo -xoid y3peaig ° "7 USue] [BIO “VW a g-9/ oeLL PLL L.zg ¢.&Z G.LL €.1g 6.9 Q-9% L.gz G.z& 6.z§ g-bz z.Gz b.9f ov 6.29 9-95 | L.S9 b.PS 19 g-&S g-LS 6.41 L.Li £z C.1% L.g1 €-91 1.0% b.Gz b.tg ¥.Lg €.&g ¢.96 G.oL z-Lg £.99 8+ Qs re cE P.6E w-LZ P .6z L.1v b.bz Q-Ss € «gz C.3z C.1z g-16 0.16 9-96 7-36 0. +6 g6 €.6g £.638 IOI 9-Sor 1.6€ Q-2& ¢.6€ 1.66 9 -0& z-0& g LV g-1S L.6z g-6z ¢.vE z-&E g-Lz g-Lz 1.PE 1.96 v.bE L.GE oP 6 .6£ V.vE L.8$ a-Lv 6.9P 6briT | azghiy 1.aP z-QE g- SP 9-aP 1.66 g-S& ¢.of £.vV L.6¢ Va Q.BS €.0€ L.9@ A oo G.o1 9-96 1.VE 6.17 €.L1 Li 1Z C.1z gI ¢.G1 1.Gz & - ES 6.Gz V.Lz €.0S F.of 9-69 ¢.ES V.LY t.tv ¢.vS L6G L.19 6.gz Lets ¢.PE g- PE B-Qz 6.Gz% ZIV V.1V &.&P Q.&% Q-3s Z-Qs / ape Q-0% La La Sale aS v.19 9-gZ 6.08 of ¢.Gg L.9L 0g 89 v.L9 9-94 L.6P ¢.&P 6.9P 1.LV LY o-1V 6.25 L.LV V.LV L.z9 Qs 6.Gz L.1& Z-QZ 1-Va ov 8-96 V.LE bY 1-09 b.GG F.09 z-&9 v.GG €.2G Z-99 z-oL v.oL g-62 g- VE 6.25 ov | G2 g-0& g-0& oS 0-bS ¢.c¢ 9S & .6G 9-66 ¢ .69 G.Lo ¢.GG %-QS ¢.¢L Le 0-64 z-oL pulp 2104 purty 2107 pulpy 210 J gShtiq | ozobiy | azohiy | vzgviy glUNaDpjoul * FT eSaGisuo) *FT 2SUDsala "FT Soamueeqgosue'y] (aTeuro;) qDgaz (117g! NIZ) a27]2y24ng “ZT 380 LISIG GUIHL ‘I XNVIVHd HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 381 and the dimensions are closer together than in the comparisons with the Hipparion above (figs. 14, 15; tables 22, 23, 24). The difference between the Langebaanweg and the Equus proximal phalanges average 6%. The situation is less clear for the relative dimensions. The lowest index for Langebaanweg is constantly smaller than the highest for burchelli, and very often even overlaps H. longipes. ‘The relatively smaller indices indicate that in the Langebaanweg specimens the length versus the breadth and the breadth versus the A-P diameter are somewhat greater than in Hipparion and burchelli. In these limited comparisons it seems that, to some extent, the Langebaanweg architecture differs from these groups. It cannot be denied that the Langebaanweg measurements fit more satisfactorily within the range of Equus, but more material and comparisons are needed before this discussion can be taken further. First phalanx, III digit A Oo &® eG& Axx x B @O dw AA xx B/A 0 ® Wy Ax vA x C OCOD wRA Axx x x C/A Ch Ye@xdCA x x C/B rx a7 y © GOx © D CHO xe x © (Fore) E COO dew Lx x © (Hind) H. elegans Seas, H. moldavicum E/A 0 00 ver x A x 3 (Fore) H. longipes (Hind) F CRE HWA xx x A(F ore) : As (Hind) E. burchelli G CXS) We @/Ax x x V (Fore) ¢ ¥ (Hind) at G/A COYOO CeLtOxA x x x Langebaanweg sp. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Abs. dimensions and Indices scale Fic. 14. Absolute dimensions and indices scale for the first phalanx of the third digit in various species of Hipparion and Equus compared with the Langebaanweg specimens. 8A 382 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Second phalanx, III digit A § (inal H. elegans aX Wadd xx Fore) . B § (fina) H. moldavicum CXS Dorie. = ; ihere H. longipes Cc COX) éeyvy LAK x ———ae 2B (herd) E. burchelli losin Vv (Fore) @O* Oe x x 7 > Tae @ (Hind) E. zebra C/A D x Langebaanweg sp. COOOVT eLAxx E @OQ 67 FAxA ) ® «x vy 64 FJO4E F- CKO © xxi 0 Ox 064 vA ¥ . F/E G KO ey TAL OCiIO xe x y AT A GA Abs. dimensions 10 20 30 40 50 60 Indices scale 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Fic. 15. Absolute dimensions and indices scale for the second phalanx of the third digit in various species of Hipparion and Equus compared with the Langebaanweg specimens. ORIGIN AND DIFFERENTIATION OF AFRICAN HIPPARIONIDS In recent years, it has become evident that Africa was more a true and independent centre of evolution and dispersion than a refuge for ‘Pontian’ Eurasiatic animal forms. Discoveries at different levels of the history of the mammals and in different regions have supported this concept proposed originally by Pilgrim (1941), and later vindicated by, inter alios, Arambourg (1959) and Cooke (1963). Several independent observations have definitely established the original role played by Africa in the development of late Tertiary mammals in general, and have illustrated its contribution to the establishment of the ‘Pontian’ fauna in particular: (i) The endemic evolutionary differentiation of the Proboscidea and Hyracoidea from the Oligocene onwards; HIPPARION FROM LANGEBAANWEG, CAPE PROVINCE 383 A. ABSOLUTE DIMENSIONS H. longipes Equus burchelli Langebaanweg (largest) (largest) (smallest) PHALANX I Total length va 54 = 69°5 75-0 70°2 Breadth prox. end ek * 42 50 50 Diameter prox. end :f ns 31°7 35 36°8 Diameter prox. artic. surf. ns 28-2 27°3 Breadth distal end BS oe 34°8 40 41°2 Diameter distal end m, A 21°5 22 23-2 Breadth median shaft .. zs 30°3 32 34°1 PHALANX II Maximum length a5 rt 42 40 47°2 Length median ant. surface... 34°5 34 34°1 Breadth prox. end hy th 39°5 46 47°8 Diameter prox. end “ie “gs 28°3 29 31 Breadth distal end ia Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Plate XII Occlusal aspect. Scale: 1 cm. A—-Lg943. B—Lg41. C—L1465p. D—Lo47. E—Lo44. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Occlusal aspect. Scale: 1 cm. A—L94 Plate XII 8. B—Lo42. C—Lg54. D—Lg36. E—S.A.M. 11724. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Plate XIV Occlusal aspect. Scale: 1 cm. A—Lg946. B—Log52. C—L1465a. D—Lo59. E—L1448. F—Lo38. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Plate XV es FE Occlusal aspect. Scale: 1 cm. A—Lo45. B—L14658. C—S.A.M. 11722. D—Lg35. E—Lo49. F—L957. =g Plate XV1 Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII 2 os 3) 45 oO oO A ore 6 ro, tl ge De ome Sel 23) 2h ane ee So Eas Ke S38 Qing a gs _ s ae Os Sein 28 hy oO vo ae) as te © 8 we =) | Op Po py Nn t.—p.i.), 21, 24(2), gi (1-3), 44(4). Price of this part /Prys van hierdie deel 80c Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap MUS. COMP. ZOOL 4 | ae 967 bre { LIE RARY. | " FEB ¢ (is. HARVARD UNIVERSITY ON THE EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA By T. H. Barry South African Museum, Cape Town (With 22 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . ‘ ; - 399 Material . : ‘ . 407 The palatoquadrate of Pristerodon . 402 Phylogeny ! P : - 405 Placodermi : : F . 405 Crossopterygii . : ‘ . 406 Labyrinthodontia , : $107 Cotylosauria. ; . . 408 Pelycosauria . ‘ , » XO Therapsida ‘ - ; ABS Triconodonta . ; ; ae Living reptiles and mammals :) Cag Conclusions . ; , 2 421 Acknowledgements. p - 423 Summary . : : ; -) 424 References : : ‘ « 424 INTRODUCTION Mainly as a result of the researches of Gaupp (1902), Allis (1919), Broom (1907, 1909 and 1914), Fuchs (1912) and Gregory and Noble (1924) it is now generally accepted that the reptilian epipterygoid and mammalian alisphenoid, although superficially different in many respects, are homologous. _ structures. The views of these workers have received support from embryologists, comparative anatomists and palaeontologists alike over the last few decades and the theory has now virtually become axiomatic. In modern reptiles there is a marked degree of variation in the development _ of the epipterygoid, ranging from the primitive, rather solid, construction of the bone in Sphenodon, to the absence or vestigial development of the bone in adult Ophidia and Crocodilia with the Lacertilia displaying a thin columnar structure. The relationship of the branches of the trigeminal nerve to the _ bone, remains constant throughout the class, the profundus emerging anterior _ to the epipterygoid and the maxillary and mandibular branches posterior to the bone. 399 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (17), 1965, 399-426, 22 figs. 400 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM In mammals the development of the alisphenoid as a relatively broad and flattened bone is fairly constant except in Echidna where it appears to be absent. In mammals, however, the relationship of the branches of the trigeminal nerve to the alisphenoid varies. This ranges from the ‘reptilian’ type, where the bone lies between the profundus and maxillary branches, found in Didelphis, through stages where first the maxillary and then also the mandibular branches pierce the bone, to where the profundus and maxillary branches both emerge anterior to the alisphenoid. The palaeontological evidence for the homology. of the reptilian epiptery- goid and the mammalian alisphenoid presented in the early years (mainly by Broom) naturally reflects the inadequate state of knowledge of the early reptile fossils at the time. Although seldom stated explicitly there was a strong tendency to see in the lacertilian condition the basic type from which the mammalian condition could be derived. | As far back as 1907 Broom stated that palaeontological evidence supported the view that the alisphenoid of mammals had evolved from the reptilian epipterygoid concluding: : ‘In the very primitive reptiles, of which Procolophon may be taken as a type, we have a lizard-like columella cranii. In the early types, which have specialized along the mammalian line, such as the Therocephalians, we still have a columella cranii. In the even more mammal-like ano- modonts, such as Dicynodon and Oudenodon, there is a columella cranii, but no alisphenoid. When we come to examine the Cynodonts—those remark- able reptiles, so very nearly related to the Mammals as to be regarded by many as the group ancestral to them-—we find a broad flattened bone, which most anatomists would not hesistate to call the alisphenoid, and yet there can be little doubt, it is only the columella cranii of the anomodont flattened out’ (p. 114). In 1914. Broom offered more direct evidence to substantiate his view stating: ‘A short Seinen: is pee in Diadectes sm a ions liarickiee pderorlls -cranii is met with in Procolophon. A short epipterygoid occurs in the Pely- . .cosaur Dimetrodon, In Anomodonts the epipterygoid is present as a long ___slender'rod—in-some species rounded and in others much flattened . . . and its lower end is considerably expanded _antero-posteriorly,-giving it a . long suture with the. pterygoid. In Gorgonopsians. the epipterygoid is a . -long, much flattened red which inferiorly has probably -similar relations _to the pterygoid as.seen in. the Anomodonts. In the -Therocephalians the epipterygoid is.only satisfactorily known in Scylacosaurus. Here, ...itisa relatively short, flattened structure with a very wide base which lies along the pterygoid. In the Cynodonts, at least in the higher forms as exemplified _ . by. Diademodon and Gynognathus, in the region-occupied by the epipterygoid in the Therocephalians there is a very much larger bone which there can EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 401 be little doubt is also an epipterygoid development. The upper part is greatly expanded antero-posteriorly and forms much of the cranial wall. The lower portion of the bone is so much more developed than in the Therocephalian that it completely replaces the posterior part of the pterygoid, . . . and extends outwards as far as the quadrate. There can be little doubt that while this bone is homologous with the epipterygoid of the lower forms, it is also the homologue of the mammalian alisphenoid’ (p- 30). In the next thirty years very little advance was made. In 1944 Olson still describes the structural changes undergone by the epipterygoid in the transition from the primitive reptilian condition to that of mammals as follows: ‘In primitive reptiles the bone is composed of a restricted basal portion and a slender ascending ramus, the columella cranii. In somewhat more advanced forms, the basal portion is expanded into a posterior quadrate ramus and an anterior pterygoid process. At this stage the ascending ramus remains a thin rod. In the advanced mammal-like reptiles, the ascending ramus is much expanded and has attained intimate association with the periotic behind and the parietal above. The quadrate and pterygoid processes are somewhat elongated’ (p. 110). In the twenty years that have elapsed since Olson wrote the foregoing descriptions of the palatoquadrate of all the principal groups of reptiles and of the forms ancestral to the reptiles have become available. A restatement of the course of the evolution of the epipterygoid-alisphenoid has therefore become necessary. In the following pages a short review of the present state of our knowledge of this element is given. Although the epipterygoid is a distinct element in the early tetrapod skull its evolution cannot be discussed in isolation since both the number of palatoquadrate ossifications and the extent of these elements vary. An account of the palatoquadrate as a whole will therefore be given and the evolutionary trends evident in its ossifications discussed. My interest in the transformation of the epipterygoid (and quadrate in so far as it affected the epipterygoid) originated while studying serially ground sections of the skull of the anomodont Pristerodon buffaloensis. This technique revealed important features of the palatoquadrate complex which would not have been readily seen in material cleaned in the normal way. As some of these features contradict vital points in the evolutionary sequences as interpreted by Broom and Olson, an account of the Pristerodon palatoquadrate will be presented first and will be followed by a general review of the trans- formation of the palatoquadrate. MATERIAL A skull of Pristerodon buffaloensis Toerien, No. B.P.I. 339, was made available for sectioning by Dr. A. S. Brink, Assistant Director of the Bernard Price Z 402 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Institute for Palaeontological Research, Johannesburg. It was discovered in 1956 by Mr. James W. Kitching of the same Institute in Cistecephalus Zone strata on the farm Kirkvors, today known as De Hoop, approximately two miles north-west of Murraysburg, Cape Province. Pristerodon belongs to the family Endothiodontidae of the Sub-order Anomodontia (Sub-class Synapsida; Order Therapsida). THE PALATOQUADRATE OF PRISTERODON The ossified palatoquadrate of Pristerodon buffaloensis is represented by the separated epipterygoid and the quadrate (figs. 1 and 4). Viewed laterally the epipterygoid is L-shaped, with both the vertical and the horizontal limbs well developed. The vertical limb (or columella cranii) is relatively thin and extends upward and slightly forward to meet a ventrally extending ridge originating PILA ANTOTICA PARABASISPHENOID Cae a eA EPIPTERYGOID PTERYGOID QUADRATOJUGAL QUADRATE RAMUS PTERYGOID fe QUADRATE RAMUS EPIPTERYGOID iy QUADRATE Fic. 1. Pristerodon buffaloensis. Lateral view of skull reconstructed from serial sections. Squamosal cut away to show palatoquadrate complex. PILA ANTOTICA AUDITORY CAPSULE ASCENDING PROCESS ~ PALATOQUADRATE BAR PARS QUADRATA Fic. 2. Tropiocolotes tripolitanus. Lateral view of skull of 15°2 mm. embryo. (After Kamal, 1960.) a EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 403 trom the under-surface of the parietal. The posteriorly directed horizontal portion is thickest near the angle of the bone, tapering posteriorly to become rod-shaped (quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid). The entire base of the epipterygoid is applied to the dorsal and/or dorso-lateral surface of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid. The quadrate rami of both the pterygoid and the epipterygoid are directed postero-laterally, towards the inner surface of the quadrate. The quadrate is relatively large, has the shape of an inverted Y in cross- section, the upper leg lying in a deep antero-posteriorly directed ventral pocket of the squamosal. It is suturally attached to two other elements only, the quadratojugal on the outside and the stapes to which it is attached through a short horizontal ridge projecting medially from the inner condyle. Antero- dorsally to this ridge there is a longitudinal groove in the vertical face of the quadrate, extending backwards from the anterior border for approximately one-third of the length of the vertical plate (fig. 4). Throughout its length this groove is seen to follow remarkably closely a course parallel to the posterior portion of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid, the latter bone terminating close to, but free from the inner surface of the quadrate, approximately half-way along its length. A distinct rounded bulge terminates the groove in the left quadrate. As the groove follows what could have been the course of a posterior extension of the horizontal limb or quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid it would seem reasonable to assume that the groove housed a cartilaginous rod connecting the quadrate with the epipterygoid. The occurrence of a solid link between the quadrate and epipterygoid in an adult Pristerodon, recalls conditions found in the developmental stages of the skull in many recent reptiles and in developmental stages of Sphenodon (fig. 3) as well as in the adult. The complex, as reconstructed in Pristerodon, ASCENDING PROCESS \ PTERYGOID PALATOQUADRATE BAR Fic. 3. Sphenodon punctatus. Embryo. Lateral view of skull. (After Howes & Swinnerton, 1901.) 404 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM shows a remarkable resemblance to the palatoquadrate of Zonurus (Condylus), as featured by Broom (1925), and of the 15-2 mm. developmental stage of the Egyptian lizard Tropzocolotes tripolitanus (fig. 2), described by Kamal (1960). Similarly the relationship between the horizontal limb and the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid in Pristerodon is mirrored by conditions found in Sphenodon, the base of the palatoquadrate cartilage occupying the dorsal and dorso-lateral surface of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid in both forms. In this connection it is important also to consider the relationship of the nerves to the complex, and especially that of the trigeminal nerve to the epipterygoid. In recent reptiles the nerve emerges from the braincase through the incisura prootica. The profundus branch then passes medially to the epipterygoid while the maxillary and mandibular rami pass behind the epiptery- goid. In Pristerodon there are no indications of the routes followed by the presumed branches of the trigeminal nerve but judging by the nerve foramina and grooves found in some early gnathostomes and tetrapods it would seem indicated that present-day relationships had an early origin. QUADRATE RAMUS OF EPIPTERYGOID LONGITUDINAL GROOVE ASCENDING RAMUS OF EPIPTERYGOID BULGE POSITION OF QUADRATE QUADRATE RAMUS OF PTERYGOID AREA OF ATTACHMENT OF STAPES Fic. 4. Pristerodon buffaloensis. Medial view of palato- quadrate complex. Left side. In the phylogenetic review that follows, it will be seen that the basic form of the palatoquadrate is retained from the early gnathostome condition up to the early ‘stem reptile’ stage. The number of ossifications in the palato- quadrate would seem to vary from stage to stage and even within stages and could possibly be of minor evolutionary importance, especially as cartilaginous inter-connections are indicated. If this is so it might explain the apparent inconsistency of an otic process on the epipterygoid ossification in certain labyrinthodonts while in other labyrinthodonts and later forms it forms part of the quadrate ossification. After the attainment of the basic reptile stage, or possibly even already during the labyrinthodont stage the palatoquadrate EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 405 begins to undergo evolutionary change which will have far reaching effects. The development is channelled into two main streams; one leading towards the expansion of the epipterygoid and reduction of the quadrate, as exemplified in those trends showing mammalian affinities, and another resulting in the retention of the quadrate and reduction of the epipterygoid in trends showing reptilian affinities. PHYLOGENY The first adequately known vertebrates are agnathous forms found in the Late Silurian. Jawed vertebrates have as yet not been discovered in the Silurian but the variety of these forms in the Lower Devonian indicates they must have been undergoing development in the Silurian (Romer, 1955). PLACODERMI The early Devonian gnathostomes are predominantly placoderms. Although widely varied in appearance, the jaw apparatus is usually of a relatively primitive type. Amongst them the acanthodians are generally regarded as the earliest and most archaic and their morphology could, therefore, throw light on the problems connected with the formation and evolution of the primitive jaws. According to Watson (1937) the acanthodian palatoquadrate is large and superficially divisable into two elements, a short horizontal suborbital or palatal portion and a large vertical postorbital or paraotic portion. In the genera Climatius and Cheiracanthus the palatoquadrate is ossified as a single unit, but in Mesacanthus and Ischnacanthus the palatal and paraotic portions are ossified independently. In Acanthodes (fig. 5), the last surviving member of the group, and therefore possibly specialized, the palatoquadrate is ossified as three separate structures, but it seems certain that these bones, in life, comprised parts of a single palatoquadrate. Anteriorly the paraotic plate ends in a vertical border, which forms the hind margin of the orbit. From the top of this border the bone curves downwards posteriorly to end in the thickened quadrate condyle. Behind the vertical border the paraotic plate is perforated by a foramen, extremely large in Cheiracanthus, which could possibly have served for the exit of the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal. The palatal portion of the palatoquadrate terminates anteriorly at a point in line with the middle of the orbit. This is some distance behind the front end of Meckel’s cartilage and would appear to indicate that the palatoquadrate was continued forward as cartilage. The palatoquadrate does not seem to have contact with the neurocranium in Climatius, but in Mesacanthus, Cheiracanthus and Acanthodes, the paraotic flange bears an otic process which articulates with the skull behind the post- orbital process. The palatal part of the bone has a basal articulation. 3 406 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM OTIC PROCESS POSTERIOR BONE ANTERIOR (PONE... OF .PALATORUABRATE IN PALATOQUADRATE IN PALATOQUADRATE my ° fi of w *. alin \ x ? CARTILAGINOUS earn rue PALATOOUAPRATS VAL Jo cee —[S= ———— —= Fic. 5. Acanthodes sp. Reconstruction of the skull from specimens from the Lebach ironstones. Complete except for squamation. (After Watson, 1937.) According to Watson (1937) the palatoquadrate in arthrodires is directly comparable with that occurring in several acanthodians. In Pholidosteus the palatoquadrate has two ossifications, an anterior which articulates with the ventral part of the neurocranium just behind the olfactory capsules, and a posterior quadrate. CROSSOPTERYGII In the Crossopterygii the processes and future subdivisions of the palatoquadrate become more apparent. In Eusthenopteron the palatoquadrate is a single ossification with, according to Jarvik (1954), five distinguishable parts; an anterior pars autopalatina, articulating with the ethmoidal region and the anterior neural endocranium; a basal process articulating with the basipterygoid process; an antero-dorsally directed ascending process which articulates with the suprapterygoid process of the neural endocranium; a paratemporal process, which articulates with the anterior end of the otic shelf and a thickened pars quadrata posteriorly. A thin film of bone, dotted with large fenestrae, makes up the rest of the palatoquadrate (fig. 6). Jarvik states that the profundus passed medially to the ascending process while the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal probably passed through the notch between the ascending and paratemporal processes. Osteolepis macrolepidotus similarly possesses a completely ossified palato- — EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 407 RATE ae cae ea See - a i = ey By WS SSS 7y ECTO- Jj ON ee i PTERYGOID a PTERYGOID Fic. 6. Eusthenopteron foordi. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones removed. (After Jarvik, 1954.) quadrate (Watson, 1954). But in Megalichthyes (Watson, 1925), the palato- quadrate is ossified as a continuous series of bones. Of these the anterior one, which extends into the basal process, represents the epipterygoid, the posterior the quadrate. LABYRINTHODONTIA The Coal Measure embolomerous anthracosaurs Palaeogyrinus decorus and Eogyrinus altheyi (Panchen, 1964) both display well developed palatoquadrates. In Palaeogyrinus (fig. 7) a large facet forms the anterior termination of a massive buttress, shaped like the mouth of a horn, which tapers forward as the palatal ramus. The latter appears to have rested on the horizontal palatal ramus of the pterygoid, but its lower edge cannot be made out. In mesial view the columella cranii appears as a slender rod extending dorsally until it expands to form an anteriorly directed process and a second vertical process. Panchen believes that the anteriorly directed process, the dorso-mesial surface of which is grooved, formed the dorsal edge of a notch for the profundus and that the second process probably divided the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve. In lateral view the columella is continuous with a sheet of bone covering the whole of the upper half of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid and which runs from the level of the cranial base to the quadrate condyle. A similar expansion is present in Edops (Romer and Whittier, 1942). Panchen believes that the epipterygoid may have extended as cartilage further down the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid and there seems also to have been a broad process projecting downward and backward from the level of the basis cranil. There is also a complex articulation for the basipterygoid process of the basisphenoid formed by both epipterygoid and pterygoid. The quadrate is small in Palaeogyrinus but is a much more extensive ossification in Edops. Panchen states that the considerable ossification in the cartilaginous palatoquadrate shown by these forms, and probably by Eogyrinus must be 408 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SPHENETHMOID PARIETAL 7: 4: \ (a fi{(7 fe [Ce Ae hae a a > SNe <1) ae ae x ~~ ~ ZZ o% SS £2 “a \ N77 PTERYGOID \ Fic. 7. Palaeogyrinus. Lateral view of suspensorial region as though sectioned through a plane parallel to the quadrate ramus. (After Panchen, 1964.) interpreted as a primitive condition and that a progressive reduction of the epipterygoid ossification is to be seen in later labyrinthodonts. Although Triassic labyrinthodonts are not on the phylogenetic line leading to reptiles, the structure of the palatoquadrate is nevertheless of interest. It consists of two parts, a horizontal cartilaginous anterior part and a mainly vertical ossified posterior part (Sushkin, 1899; Watson, 1919 and 1926, and Save-Séderbergh, 1936). The vertical part had, at least in Lyrocephalus, basal, ascending and otic processes. Save-Séderbergh maintains that all these processes were embodied in the epipterygoid in the most completely ossified individuals, but that in Aphaneramma and Platystega the ascending process only was included in the epipterygoid. The epipterygoid was joined to the quadrate ossification by means of a cartilaginous link which rested in a groove of the ramus of the pterygoid. We may therefore assume that the palatoquadrate survived in laby- rinthodonts complete from the quadrate to at least the front end of the epipterygoid. COTYLOSAURIA Whether or not the seymouriamorphs are considered amphibians or reptiles, the skull of primitive forms such as Seymouria and Kollassia show that they are not far removed from the anthracosaurian amphibians from which the seymouriamorphs and more advanced reptiles have been derived (Romer, 1956). The epipterygoid, which is not well known and seems to be slow to EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 409 ossify, extends as a rod-like structure to the skull roof. The primitive quadrate, when well ossified, ran forward to meet the epipterygoid. When the quadrate is less fully ossified, a cartilaginous area may have bridged the gap between the quadrate and the epipterygoid (fig. 8). It is presumed that the tendency for the epipterygoid to remain unossified is a degenerate feature (Romer, 1956). The earliest known reptiles date from the Carboniferous but knowledge of their anatomy is fragmentary. Abundant forms appear in the Upper Carboniferous and Lower Permian but as these include not only primitive forms but also more advanced types, it is certain that a very important section of the early history of the reptiles is still unknown. In diadectids both epipterygoid and quadrate are greatly developed. Diadectes itself features a quadrate of considerable height and width but little length (Romer, 1956). In the South African pareiasaurs both epipterygoid and quadrate are plate-like. The epipterygoid, which has a slender ascending process, furthermore stands transversely on the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid near its articulation with the basipterygoid process (Boonstra, 1934). According to Romer (1956) the margins of the base of the epipterygoid in pareiasaurians are unfinished, indicating a cartilaginous connection with the quadrate which has a similarly unfinished surface facing towards the epipterygoid. The captorhinomorphs Limnosceles, Captorhinus and Labidosaurus from the Lower Permian of the American Southwest are among the oldest cotylosaurs EPIPTERYGOID *BASI- . OCCIPITAL PTERYGOID Mei. a CARTILAGINOUS PORTION OF PALATOQUADRATE RECONSTRUCTED QUADRATE Fic. 8. Seymouria. Lateral view of the skull with dermal bones removed. Cartilaginous portion of palatoquadrate reconstructed. (After Romer, 1956.) 410 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM of which we have detailed knowledge. Here the quadrate also consists of a vertical sheet of bone with an essentially flat outer surface and an epipterygoid, separated from the quadrate but presumably attached to it in life by cartilage, with a rod-like ascending process (fig. 9). WII’ NYMR EPIPTERYGOID Z a ae ae -——. wea = ~~ 7? CARTILAGINOUS PALATOQUADRATE 27 PTERYGOID QUADRATE Fic. 9. Captorhinus. Lateral view of the skull with dermal bones removed. Cartilaginous portion of palatoquadrate tentatively indicated. (After Romer, 1956.) Although we have no knowledge of the epipterygoid in the aberrant early Permian form Bolosaurus (Watson, 1954), the fact that the inner part of the quadrate continues forward as a ramus, on the outer surface of the pterygoid, would seem to indicate that the palatoquadrate was basically the same as the general cotylosaurian type. The Lower Triassic form Procolophon belongs to the last group of survivors of the cotylosaurs. In this form the epipterygoid has an expanded footplate, the anterior extension of which is more fully developed than the posterior portion. From the posterior portion of the footplate a slender ascending ramus extends dorsally. The quadrate is large and has a process extending forward which partially replaces the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid. In Procolophon the latter is reduced in length as well as in height. PELYCOSAURIA If, as is generally accepted, the Pelycosauria represent an early stage in mammalian history and that they possess ‘. . . many archaic features which EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA A411 illustrate the structure of the primitive reptilian stock’ (Romer & Price, 1940: 1), then it should not be surprising to find that this group still displays a palatoquadrate complex in which the epipterygoid and quadrate portions are linked. This condition would merely represent the retention in this group of the basic gnathostome condition of a unified palatoquadrate as exemplified in the placoderms, and retained, with modifications, in the crossopterygians, labyrinthodonts and probably also the early stem reptiles. The epipterygoid has a wide base closely applied to the lateral surface of the anterior portion of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid (fig. 10). Anteriorly a slender extension curves down along a groove on the dorsal surface of the palatal ramus of the pterygoid. A continuation of this groove in some cases beyond the anterior end of the bone suggests a further cartilaginous extension of the palatoquadrate. The slender rod-like portion of the epipterygoid gains contact, in Dimetrodon, with the anterior surface of the paroccipital process. EPIPTERYGOID FOOTPLATE OF % EPIPTERYGOID PTERYGOID Fic. 10. Dimetrodon limbatus. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones cut off to show palatoquadrate. (After Romer & Price, 1940.) The quadrate is essentially a triangular plate varying greatly in extent in the few forms where it is adequately known. In some cases in which it is well developed it appears to gain contact with the epipterygoid along the dorsal margin of the internal surface of the pterygoid (fig. 10), while in others in which the bone is more restricted in size, it appears to have been continued forward as cartilage. ! THERAPSIDA Dinocephalia Of the slightly more advanced mammal-like reptiles, the therapsids, the Dinocephalia are generally regarded as the oldest and in many respects the most primitive suborder. In them, according to Boonstra (personal communica- tion), the epipterygoid is small or reduced except in the titanosuchid genus 412 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Anteosaurus. In the latter the bone extends right up to the skull roof, has an expanded waist and a relatively long anterior footplate. In Jonkeria (titano- suchid) the footplate is also extended anteriorly but dorsally the epipterygoid only reaches halfway to the roofing bones while the footplate as well as the dorsal ramus are reduced in the tapinocephalid Struthiocephalus. In none of the Dinocephalia do we find evidence of a posterior extension to the footplate which could have formed a link between the epipterygoid and the quadrate. According to Watson (1914) the Dinocephalia, as a group, has a very special importance because alone amongst the therapsids it retained a large quadrate. This feature as well as the absence of the quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid indicates affinities with the reptilian rather than the mammalian lines of evolution. Anomodontia The anomodonts are generally regarded to be an aberrant group of mammal-like reptiles with but weak mammalian affinities. This is borne out by the structure of the palatoquadrate complex in this group. As in the Dino- cephalia the anomodonts Kannemeyeria erithrea (Case, 1934), Dicynodon kolbe (Broom, 1932), D. sollast (Watson, 1948), Lystrosaurus murray: (Broom, 1932), Daptocephalus leoniceps (Ewer, 1961), Kingoria nowacki (Cox, 1959), Dicynodon grimbeeki and Pristerodon buffaloensis, all display an epipterygoid with a long, thin dorsally projecting columellar portion, reminiscent of recent reptiles (see later). However, in contrast to the latter the base of the epipterygoid is expanded, to varying degrees, in all of the above, extending for some distance along the upper edge of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid. In Kannemeyeria the base extends from a point close to the quadrate to beyond the front of the interpterygoid space. In the anomodonts investigated, there is no direct contact between the epipterygoid and the quadrate (fig. 11), but there is a distinct probability that a cartilaginous link existed in life in some of these forms, as has been shown PTERYGOID ° QUADRATO- JUGAL EPIPTERYGOID QUADRATE Fic. 11. Dicynodon sp. Lateral view of skull. EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 413 for Pristerodon. However, the general tendency within the group is for the bar, linking the epipterygoid to the quadrate portion, to become reduced; an evolutionary trend, as will be shown later, that was present also in the line that culminated in modern reptiles. Gorgonopsia In all known Gorgonopsia the epipterygoid is high and relatively narrow, with a well-developed footplate. In ‘Lycaenodon’ (fig. 12), Scymnognathus, Lepto- trachelus, Cynariops (Boonstra, 1934a) and Aelurognathus (Haughton, 1924), the footplate has a long tapering anterior extension, with a short posterior extension ending some distance away from the quadrate. Boonstra found no evidence in this group of a widening of the vertical portion of the epipterygoid. EPIPTERYGOID PROOTIC FOOT PLATES _——< Fic. 12. ‘Lycaenodon’. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones cut away. (After Boonstra, 19344.) Therocephalia In the early Tapinocephalus Zone forms such as the pristerognathids Scylacosaurus and Scymnosaurus (Boonstra, 1934b, 1954), and most of the primitive therocephalians, the vertical portion of the epipterygoid is still relatively narrow, but in Glanosuchus macrops (Boonstra, 1954) the epipterygoid has become dumb-bell-shaped, although still not much widened. The base has no noteworthy posterior process. However, in the lycosuchid Trochosaurus major (Boonstra, 1934b) occurring in the same zone, the epipterygoid has 414 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM developed into a large, broad plate which obscures the lateral opening into the pituitary fossa and the foramina for the Vth and VIth nerves. The epiptery- goid here is more than twice as broad as in any known gorgonopsian and has the appearance of a cynodont epipterygoid. It differs from that known in Scymnosaurus and Scylacosaurus in having an expanded upper end in addition to a wide footplate, a condition reaching its greatest development in the later whaitsids (Boonstra, 1934). Of the Cistecephalus Zone Therocephalia, Euchambersia mirabilis (Boonstra, 1936) also shows the dorsally and ventrally expanded condition (fig. 13) but the shaft of the bone does not show much expansion. In the scaloposaurid Ictidosuchops intermedius (Crompton, 1955), however, the shaft is a broad one, and ends in a slightly more expanded dorsal portion which fits into a shallow depression in the antero-dorsal wall of the prootic, consequently forming part of the true lateral wall of the braincase. The anterior extension of the footplate is long, but the posterior one is short. At the juncture of the posterior extension and the ascending ramus there is a shallow notch which most probably housed the maxillary or both the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve (Crompton, 1955). EPIPTERYGOID QUADRATE RAMUS OF PTERYGOID Fic. 13. Euchambersia mirabilis. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones cut away. (After Boonstra, 1936.) Fic. 14. Aneugomphius ictidoceps. Lateral view of skull with outlines of palatoquadrate bones indicated. (After Brink, 1956.) EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 415 In Theriognathus microps (Boonstra, 1934), Notosollasia laticeps (Boonstra, 1934) and Aneugomphius ictidoceps (Brink, 1956), as in all known whaitsids, the epipterygoid is broad and flat with greatly expanded dorsal and ventral ends (fig. 14). The base is long and in most forms posteriorly overlaps the prootic obscuring the incisura prootica. The hind wall of the epipterygoid in Aneugomphius shows two deep notches, probably for the exit of the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve. Cynodontia Brink (1960) states that the epipterygoids of the primitive cynodont Scalopocynodon gracilis are *. . . Cynodont-like in being broadly expanded, but Therocephalian-like in their feeble overlap of the prootics’ (p. 145). The anterior extension of the footplate is long and broad while the remainder of the ventral margin follows the dorsal margin of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid (fig. 15). Brink made the interesting observation that the anterior margin of the epipterygoid is very thick. This may well support the view that this portion of the vertical limb is the more stable and is older phylogenetically than the thinner, posterior section of the limb. The quadrate is in the shape of a wedge lodged loosely in a cavity anteriorly in the squamosal. The anterior margin is straight, blunt and vertical, while the posterior margin is sharp and broadly curved. The quadrate is a much smaller bone than the epipterygoid and is well separated from the latter. In Thrinaxodon lorhinus (Parrington, 1946) the epipterygoid is greatly expanded and dorsally is broadly in contact with the prootic. The quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid joins the prootic, but does not reach the quadrate, leaving a large foramen between the epipterygoid and prootic for the maxillary and mandibular rami. The quadrate, which is about one-third the size of the epipterygoid, has a wide, dumb-bell-shaped articulating surface and a thin, slightly curved dorsal process which medially is greatly strengthened by a pillar-like development which continues to the apex of the bone. In an unidentified cynodont, which compares closely with Trirachodon, Parrington (1946) found two foramina between the epipterygoid and prootic. A groove comparable with that leading into the single foramen in Thrinaxodon, leads into the lower, larger foramen from below and behind. The dorsal smaller foramen is probably new. Parrington states that the significance of this development lies in the possibility that the maxillary left the skull by the upper foramen, which is apparently mainly enclosed by the epipterygoid, and is equivalent to the foramen rotundum, and the mandibular by the lower, larger foramen, the equivalent of the foramen ovale. The size of both foramina indicates that blood vessels accompanied the nerves. In Diademodon mastacus (Brink, 1955) the foramen for the trigeminal is also divided into two, although incompletely in this species (fig. 16). The foramen lies slightly above and behind the pituitary fossa. The epipterygoid itself covers the anterior half of the prootic. The footplate is extensive and 416 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM extends forward as a very thin tapering process while it reaches the quadrate with its posterior extension. In the cynognathids, the thin plate-like epipterygoid overlaps the anterior superior process of the prootic. The footplate of the base is extensive. It sends back a posterior extension which occupies the position of the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid and which reaches the relatively reduced quadrate. QUADRATE RAMUS OF PTERYGOID Fic. 15. Scalopocynodon gracilis. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones cut away. (After Brink, 1960.) EPIPTERYGOID QUADRATE RAMUS OF PTERYGOID Fic. 16. Diademodon mastacus. Lateral view of skull with dermal bones cut away. (After Brink, 1955.) '\ EPIPTERYGOID eS See 5 ee Se ic = = —— Hae \ -— \\ \\ Se NOTCH “¢ , SS sya yt sl Pg ele \\ Av FOR V2 & V3 \ (Ee: ==. geal \ a Va SS Li ak PTERYGOID QUADRATE RAMUS OF EPIPTERYGOID Fic. 17. Diarthrognathus broomi. Lateral view of skull. (After Crompton, 1958.) EPIPTERYGOID —ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 417 Ictidosauria In Diarthrognathus broom: the dorsal portion of the epipterygoid is extremely broad and overlaps the prootic above the prootic incisure. Here the posterior edge of the epipterygoid is slightly indented for the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve (fig. 17). Crompton (1958) states that although it is difficult to ascertain, it would appear that the quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid meets the antero-medial edge of the quadrate. The quadrate is much reduced, S-shaped in occipital view, and the articular surface is markedly concave. This latter feature, according to Crompton, is of great significance as in all known therapsids, including Bzenotherium and Oligokyphus, the articular face of the quadrate is either flat or convex, but never concave. It is also significant that the mammalian malleus (articular) possesses a convex articular surface which meets a convex articular face in the incus (quadrate). In Bienotherium (Hopson, 1964) the epipterygoid and the anterior part of the prootic together form the side wall of the brain case (fig. 18). The quadrate ramus of the epipterygoid is more vertically orientated and deeper than in EPIPTERYGOID FRONTAL PARIETAL eRe eg PROOTIC ORBITAL FISSURE Fic. 18. Bienotherium yunnenense. Lateral view of braincase reconstructed from serial sections. (After Hopson, 1964.) 418 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM the cynodonts and could have reached the quadrate. The ascending ramus is broad and high with a posterior border which is overlapped laterally, above the trigeminal foramen, by the prootic. This latter is the reverse of the usual reptilian condition in which the prootic lies medial to the epipterygoid, and is ascribed by Hopson to the development of a forward extension of the anterior portion of the prootic in such a way that it lies lateral to the cavum epiptericum. In Bienotherium both this extension—the ventro-lateral flange —and the antero- dorsal border of the prootic extend well forward of the prootic incisure, an observation which has led Hopson to conclude that the prootic component of the trigeminal foramen in this form is not strictly homologous with the prootic incisure in cynodonts, because the former is merely a notch in the anterior border of the ventro-lateral flange. This conclusion seems to be supported by the fact that the trigeminal foramen pierces the side wall of the skull anterior to the depression of the semilunar ganglion. It also indicates that the maxillary and mandibular branches extend in an anterior direction through the cavum epiptericum in Bzenotherium, whereas normally, in those forms with broadened epipterygoids, they pass in a posterior direction. The trigeminal foramen is slightly constricted at mid-length presumably indicating the incipient subdivision of the single trigeminal foramen into the separate foramina rotundum and ovale of mammals. TRICONODONTA In a group of Mesozoic mammals, the Triconodonta, the brain case has an essentially reptilian structure. According to Kermack (1963) Triconodon mordax and Trioracodon ferox still possessed a cavum epiptericum lying outside the ossified lateral wall of the braincase (formed by the petrosal) and as in Morganucodon and possibly all pre-Cretaceous mammals, the alisphenoid formed the lateral boundary of the cavum. The ramus profundus passed out through the anterior end of the cavum epiptericum while the maxillary and mandibular nerves passed out through two foramina formed in the posterior edge of the alisphenoid. According to Kermack, the semilunar ganglion in Morganucodon lay inside the primary wall of the braincase and the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve passed though the foramen pseudovale in the anterior lamina of the petrosal. The lamina extends much further forward in Morganucodon than it does in cynodonts. The maxillary branch of the fifth nerve presumably left the braincase, passing through the notch at the front end of the anterior lamina. After crossing the cavum epiptericum both branches would have left it by passing behind or through the alisphenoid in some way reminiscent of cynodonts. In basic construction the braincase of the triconodonts differs from that of an advanced therapsid only in the narrower cavum epiptericum in the former, a difference due to the relatively larger size of the brain in mammals. EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 419 LiviING REPTILES AND MAMMALS Amongst recent reptiles Sphenodon has virtually retained its larval palato- quadrate in the adult (compare figs 3 and 1g) but in the lizards Lacerta (Gaupp, 1906), Cordylus, Eremias and Mabuia (Broom, 1903), Tropiocolotes (Kamal, 1960), Varanus (Frazetta, 1962), Tupznambis (Jollie, 1960) and many others, and in the chelonians Emys (Kunkel, 1912) and Chrysemys (Shaner, 1926), the palatoquadrate complex undergoes considerable changes during ontogeny. Ossifications within the complex culminate in the formation of widely separated epipterygoid and quadrate portions, while the rest of the palatoquadrate is resorbed. The quadrate is retained as a comparatively strong element while the epipterygoid is whittled down to a narrow rod-like structure (fig. 20). The base of the bone is not expanded. It has, however, a cartilaginous epiphysis, fitting into the fossa pterygoidei which may be linked with the quadrate through a strand of connective tissue, both epiphysis and connecting strand probably representing remnants of the palatoquadrate cartilage. EPIPTERYGOID PROOTIC QUADRATE Fic. 19. Sphenodon punctatus. Lateral view of the skull with dermal bones cut off to show palatoquadrate. Pp QUADRATE TERYGOID SHOBTIC QUADRATE RAMUS OF PTERYGOID Fic. 20. Tupinambis nigropunctatus. Lateral view of skull. (After Jollie, 1960.) 420 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Further reduction of the epipterygoid has taken place in the lizards Agama, Lyrwcephalus and Calotes (Ramaswami, 1946), Ophioceps and Anniella (Jollie, 1960), Phrynocephalus (Siebenrock, 1895), Physignatus, Chlamydosaurus and Amphibolurus (Beddard, 1905), where the epipterygoid is very short. However, in the Chamaeleontidae, Dibamidae (Boulenger, 1887) and apparently most Amphisbaenidae (known only in Trogonophis, Bellairs, 1950), the epipterygoid is absent. In the Chelonia the epipterygoid is still present but very small (Parker, 1880) while it is much reduced or vestigial in Ophidia and Crocodilia, although the embryos of crocodiles still show the ascending process (Parker, 1883; Shiino, 1914). In birds it appears to be absent (Goodrich 1930), the quadrate being the only part of the palatoquadrate to be retained in the adult. : Where present the epipterygoid lies lateral to the lateral head vein, postero-lateral to the profundus and antero-medial to the maxillary and mandibular branches and the orbital artery. In mammals the alisphenoid appears to be lost in Echidna. In this feature, as will be seen later, Echidna probably shows reptilian affinities. In Dasyurus the dorsal end of the ala temporalis fuses with the orbital cartilage, but in all other mammals, as far as is known, the ala temporalis ends freely (De Beer, 1937). In Didelphis the alisphenoid lies between the profundus and maxillary rami, as in reptiles. In Trichosurus, Mus, Mustela and many others (De Beer, ALISPHENOID / = ORBITAL FISSURE FORAMEN OVALE FORAMEN ROTUNDUM Fic. 21. Felis domestica. Lateral view of skull with jugal arch cut away. 1937) the alisphenoid is pierced by the maxillary ramus (foramen rotundum), while in Felis (fig. 21), and the majority of mammals the mandibular ramus too may pass through it (foramen ovale). In the fourth group the maxillary emerges freely in front of the alisphenoid (De Beer, 1937). Edinger and Kitts (1954) state that the mandibular branch of the trige- minal appears to have been variable in its relations to the alisphenoid in living mammals as the foramen ovale is absent in some of them. Several EPIPTERYGOID —ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 421 genera of extant Perissodactyla and Artiodactyla lack the foramen but in both these orders a separate foramen ovale was the usual condition in the early Tertiary. Comparison of fossil and recent material suggests a similar trend in certain families of the Rodentia and Insectivora. They relate the formation of the foramen ovale with an earlier palaeoneurological development when the mandibular nerve came to branch off the trigeminal stem intra- cranially, during or near the origin of mammals. It is only in some later forms that the nerve used the foramen lacerum for its passage from the brain- case. This probably indicates that its absence is a secondary condition and possibly reveals an evolutionary trend within the mammals to abolish the separate exit of the mandibular nerve. (CONCLUSIONS The evolutionary history of the palatoquadrate has been followed, as far as the availability of information on fossil material permits, from the early gnathostome condition to that in recent reptiles and mammals. It has been shown that the primitive palatoquadrate was a solid structure, consisting mostly of several ossifications, with four main processes for its attachment to the neurocranium. These are the otic, ascending, basal and pterygoid processes. In tetrapods the ossifications are reduced to two. During its evolutionary history the palatoquadrate shows a tendency to become reduced in size, the pterygoid process shortens considerably while the area between the otic and ascending processes becomes deeply excavated thereby accentuating and demarcating the epipterygoid and quadrate portions. The demarcation of these two elements becomes more pronounced as evolution progresses. Conditions in recent and fossil forms show that the palatoquadrate of both recent reptiles and mammals are deducable from the early gnathostome condition and that they evolved through the placoderm, crossopterygian, labyrinthodont and early stem reptile stages. In the groups leading to or showing affinities with the lines leading to modern reptiles, the trend is towards the progressive reduction of that part of the palatoquadrate anterior to the quadrate. In most reptiles the epipterygoid is the only part of this area to be retained but in some recent forms even this too disappears. In those lines leading towards mammals the opposite occurred and regression of the quadrate took place while the epipterygoid expanded (fig. 22). From the foregoing it is clear that the phylogenetic and ontogenetic evidence do not support the view that the epipterygoid in the primitive reptile possessed a restricted base. The latter condition is a specialized reptilian one as is proved by conditions obtaining in adult forms of many recent reptiles. It is a stage in the gradual reduction of the epipterygoid in this group. Olson’s (1944) views on the evolutionary development of the epipterygoid, must then differ from those given here. 422 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM S PLACODERM STAGE TD CROSSOPTERYGIAN STAGE \ LABYRINTHODONT STAGE etd COTYLOSAURIAN STAGE LINES SHOWING LINES SHOWING REPTILIAN AFFINITIES MAMMALIAN AFFINITIES a ‘ EVOLUTIONARY | EVOLUTIONARY TREND Za sae ee 7 ares an. 4 A Ao ie GORGONOPSIAN PROCOLOPHONIO DICYNODONT Ki ' LIZARD ! SPHENODON CYNODONT MAMMAL CHAMELEON Fic. 22. Schematic presentation of probable evolutionary trend in development of palatoquadra leading towards recent reptiles and mammals. EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 423 Although the therapsids show a marked degree of variability in the struc- _ ture of the epipterygoid, we find that the groups which show mammalian affinities have also retained certain basic features of the early tetrapod palato- _ quadrate complex. The most noticeable of these is the retention of the extensive base of the epipterygoid, indicating that a considerable portion of the base of _ the palatoquadrate anterior to the quadrate, of the early labyrinthodont and stem reptile, had been retained. Two further features are closely linked with the development of the alisphenoid in mammals. Firstly the expansion posteriorly of the rod-like ascending process of the epipterygoid and secondly, the increase in size of the brain in forms approaching the transitional stage. Backward extension of the ascending process would result in the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve being pushed backward by the epipterygoid as the latter progresses past the incisura prootica through which the trigeminal emerges. The increase in size of the brain in mammals and the consequent lateral expansion of the braincase, could conceivably result in the nerves becoming trapped between the posteriorly extending epipterygoid and the expanding braincase. Close contact between the epipterygoid and braincase could force the nerves to seek an exit through the epipterygoid. Whether this results in the formation of a notch only, a foramen or two foramina depends largely on the separate development of the epipterygoid and prootic, the way these bones make contact and where this contact is made. In this way the maxillary ramus can emerge through the foramen rotundum while the mandibular emerges farther back through its own foramen ovale or merely through a notch in the posterior portion. If the expansion of the braincase is continued anteriorly the cavum epiptericum would be obliterated, as it has been in mammals. This could mean that the pila antotica, which forms the inner wall of the cavum in reptiles, could have been pushed against the alisphenoid and as the pila will then virtually have become redundant, there is no need for it to develop in mam- mals. The possibility that this could have happened is strengthened by the fact that isolated cartilaginous fragments of the pila antotica have been found in many higher mammals, e.g. Lepus (Voit, 1909), Homo (Macklin, 1914), Felis (Terry, 1917), Didelphys (Toplitz, 1920), Halicore (Matthes, 1921) and Tarsius (Henckel, 1927). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to record my gratitude to the South African Council for Scientific _ and Industrial Research for a research grant during the tenure of which most of this work was carried out. I should like to thank Professor E. Jarvik, Profes- sor E. Stensié and the staff of the Palaeontological Institute of the Swedish Museum of Natural History for their kindness, co-operation and assistance 424 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM while working in the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm. My thanks are also due to Dr. A. S. Brink, Dr. M. E. Malan and Dr. L. D. Boonstra for reading the manuscript and making valuable suggestions, and Mrs. I. Rudner for copying some of the drawings used in this paper. The trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper. SUMMARY The serial sectioning of the skull of the anomodont Pristerodon buffaloensis has produced valuable evidence regarding the structure of the palatoquadrate complex and the evolution of the therapsid epipterygoid. A short review is given of the structure of the palatoquadrate in the most important known fossil vertebrate groups. It is emphasized that the mammalian alisphenoid should not be looked upon as a transformation of the rod-like epipterygoid, as found in more spe- cialized true reptiles as Broom and others implied, but that both conditions are derived from a common ancestral type. REFERENCES Axis, E. P. 1919. The homologies of the alisphenoids of the Sauropsida. 7. Anat., Lond. 53: 209-222. BEDDARD, F. E. 1905. Some notes on the cranial osteology of the mastigure lensed Uromastix. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1905: 1-9. Betiarrs, A, d’A. 1950. Observations on the cranial anatomy of Anniella, and a comparison with that of other burrowing lizards. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 119: 887-904. Boonstra, L. D. 1934 a. Additions to our knowledge of the South African Gorgonopsia, pre- served in the British Museum (Natural History). Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 31: 175-213. Boonstra, L. D. 1934. b. A contribution to the morphology of the mammal-like reptiles of the sub-order Therocephalia. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 31: 215-267. Boonstra, L. D. 1938. On a South African mammal-like reptile, Bauria cynops. Palaeobiologica 6: 164-183. Boonstra, L. D. 1943. Pareiasaurian studies. Part IX.—The cranial osteology. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 31: 1-38. Boonstra, L. D. 1954. The pristerognathid therocephalians from the Tipinacdbioade Zone in the South African Museum. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 42: 65-107. BouLencER, G. A. 1887. Catalogue of the lizards in the British Museum (Natural History). 2nd ed. 3. London: British Museum. Brink, A. S. 1955. A study of the skeleton of Diademodon. Palaeont. Afr. 3: 3-39. Brink, A. S. 1956. On Aneugomphius ictidoceps Broom and Robinson. Palaeont. Afr. 4: 97-115. Brink, A. S. 1960. A new type of primitive cynodont. Palaeont. Afr. 7: 119-154. Broom, R. 1903. On the development of the pterygoquadrate arch in Lacertilia. 7. Anat., Lond. 37: 107-111. Broom, R. 1907. On the homology of the mammalian alisphenoid bone. Rep. S. Afr. Ass. Ado. Sci. 1907: 114-115. Broom, R. 1909. Observations on the development of the marsupial skull. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 34: 24-105. Broom, R. 1914. Croonian lecture. On the origin of mammals. Phil. Trans. (B) 206: 1-48. Broom, R. 1925. On the origin of lizards. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1925: 1-16. Broom, R. 1932. The mammal-like reptiles of South Africa and the origin of mammals. London: Witherby. | ee ee ee eee EPIPTERYGOID—ALISPHENOID TRANSITION IN THERAPSIDA 425 Case, E. C. 1934. ae of the ia of pico erithrea Haughton. Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 4: 115-127. Cox, C. B. 1959:. On the anatomy of a new dicguiodont genus. with einen o the position - of the tympanum. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 132: 321-367. Crompton, A. W. 1955. A revision of the Scaloposauridae with special cence to kinetism 1 in - this family.. Navors. nas. Mus., Bloemfontein. 1: 149-183. | Crompton, A. W. 1958. The peal morphology = a-new genus and -species: of ictidosaurian, Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 130: 183-216. De BEER, G. 1937. The development of the ee skull. Onford: University Press. Epincer, T. & Kirts, D..B..1954. The foramen ovale. Evolution. 8: 389-404... MN Ewer, R. F. 1961. The anatomy of eee eoThOe Ont Daptocephalus leoniceps (Owen). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 136: 375-402. FRAZzETTA, -T. H. 1962. A functional demitidesctidin of: cena kimesis in lizards. J. pha Tin: 287-319. Gaupp, E. 1902. Uber die Ala temporalis des Sanpciiceen ale gad die Regio orhitis einiger anderer Wirbelthierschadel. Anat. Hefie Abt. 1. 19: 155-230. GoopricH, E. S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. London: MacMillan. Grecory, W. K. & Nose, G. K. 1924. The origin of the mammalian alisphenoid bone. J. Morph. 39: 435-463. Haucuton, S. H. 1924. On some gorgonopsian skulls in the collection of the South African Museum. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 12: 499-517. HENCKEL, K. O. 1927. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Halbaffenschadels. <. Morph. Anthrop. 26: 365-383. Hopson, J. A. 1964. The braincase of the advanced mammal-like reptile Bienotherium. Postilla 87: 1-30. JARvix, E. 1954. On the visceral skeleton in Eusthenopteron with a discussion of the parasphenoid and palatoquadrate in fishes. K. svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. (4) 5 (1): 1-104. Jouuie, M. T. 1960. The head skeleton of the lizard. Acta zool., Stockh. 41: 1-64. Kama, A. M. 1960. The chondrocranium of Tropiocolotes tripolitanus. Acta zool., Stockh. 41: 297-312. Kermack, K. A. 1963. The cranial structure of the triconodonts. Phil. Trans. (B) 246: 83-103. KUNKEL, B. W. 1912. The development of the skull of Emys lutaria. 7. Morph. 23: 633-765. Mackin, C. C. 1914. The skull of a human fetus of 40 mm. Amer. 7. Anat. 16: 317-426. ~ Marrues, E. 1921. Zur Entwicklung des Kopfskelettes der Sirenen. Das Primordialkranium von Halicore dugong. K. Anat. Entw-Gesch. Abt. 1. 60: 1-304. Otson, E. C. 1944. Origin of mammals based upon cranial morphology of the therapsid sub- orders. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer. 55: i-xi, 1-136. PancHEN, A. L. 1964. The cranial anatomy of two Coal Measure anthracosaurs. Phil. Trans. (B) 247: 593-637. ParRKER, W. K. 1880. Development of the green turtle (Chelone viridis, Schneider). Rep. Voy. Challenger 1873-76. 1 (5): 1-58. ParKER, W. K. 1883. On the structure and development of the skull in Crocodilia. Trans. zool. Soc. Lond. 11: 263-310. PARRINGTON, F’. R. 1946. On the cranial anatomy of cynodonts. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 116: 181-197. Ramaswaml, L. S. 1946. The chondrocranium of Calotes versicolor (Daud.) with a description of the osteocranium of a just-hatched young. Quart. 7. micr. Sci. 87: 237-297. Romer, A. S. & Price, L. W. 1940. Review of the Pelycosauria. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer. 28: i-x, 1-538. Romer, A. S. 1955. Vertebrate paleontology. Chicago: University Press. Romer, A. S. 1956. Osteology of the reptiles. Chicago: University Press. SAVE-SODERBERGH, G. 1936. On the morphology of the Triassic stegocephalians from Spitz- bergen and the interpretation of the endocranium in Labyrinthodontia. K. svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. (3) 16 (1): 1-181. SHANER, R. F. 1926. The development of the skull of the turtle, with remarks on fossil reptile skulls. Anat. Rec. 32: 343-367. Suno, K. 1914. Studien zur Kenntnis des Wirbeltierképfes. 1. Das Chondrocranium von Crocodilus mit Beriicksichtigung der Gehirnnerven und der K6épfgefasse. Anat. Hefte Abt 1. 50: 253-382. 426 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SIEBENROCK, F. 1895. Das Skelet der Agamidae. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Abt. 1. 104: 1089-1196. Susuxin, P. O. 1899. Schadel von Tinunculus. Nouv. Mem. Soc. Nat. Moscou. 16: 1-163. TerRRY, R. J. 1917. The primordial cranium of the cat. 7. Morph. 29: 281-433. T6puitz, C. 1920. Bau und Entwicklung des Knorpelschadels von Didelphis marsupialis. Zoologica, Stuttgart. 70. Vortr, M. 1909. Das Primordialkranium des Kaninchens unter Beriicksichtigung der Deck- knochen. Anat. Hefte. Abt. 1. 38: 425-616. Watson, D. M, S. 1919. The structure, evolution and origin of the Amphibia— The ‘Orders’ Rachitomi and Stereospondyli. Phil. Trans. (B) 209: 1-73. Watson, D. M.S. 1926. The evolution and origin of the Amphibia. Phil. Trans. (B) 214: 189-257. Watson, D. M. S. 1937. The acanthodian fishes. Phil. Trans. (B) 228: 49-146. Watson, D. M. S. 1948. Dicynodon and its allies. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 118: 823-877. Watson, D. M. S. 1954. On Bolosaurus and the origin and classification of reptiles. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 111: 297-449. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLe or Contents and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4# in. X 7 in. (7$ in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: SmitH, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). +t WEL OTS ce er ys a BaNt, in Oe rid ie ’ wv : i i J nm ‘ i‘ ( 4 pe ha Dl LEM ORL iF a! ene | oT i = j Pe) nT area Ay } a : , ba Peele ae | rid, '} lee is . $\ CAL WD th ‘ hy } \ . - I 5 , joey w 4 . WY ed! ( , ;, J 7 t ti i y i ¥ t ' ui , , 7 i : \ ; 1 ‘ : * ‘ = r J / C7 fers REL : Leary} 7 We, ? j f a Ve { ‘ \ , i, ay i a 4 ak oy = p 4 bry ‘ in ay ) A ee ae ae ‘ 1a 1) Soar 85 NE io ee a! ye t \ * acar yes : $e Aer Mie bol $3: " A ‘ OY. a bide OM ar | } . mh ivy ae A 2 y 5 y s y y ih Way 4s CTP a SAD Fat es iT eh (a? hth) Ry id Binge aa * ‘ j : ; j Am ae tet RA A | b 4 ee | aly hy $i ; ' { v's Fi : , § A a 9 a oF ’ ‘ \ PR hy gh. tlk gant ark ne PAE WUC RE he ison ad y 4 ae b woke Zz) mbar Gh cd a : £yri eats et (ah Shy gies 9 ee ° See fc (ie va ‘ MY a Cle ae A ' ‘ 1.08, eA. : reer . a 2 70 fe: “4a; fT ie oGH, ' Fr . 3 pet A Ph 4 2 ‘, Jae i a wiht 2 : NJ wets i) ame | h ar seat Y | ws bere! Va ; Rei pies, ake A sf yang ' t.. OOS RE a feng ee era hevR, aah, ‘ 7 } Ty of 7 0 DS ia Tay 8 Se , ae syed tal ame ee Le nD: ear ao a mA 7 | is A) 2710 PORE OT 2s) Valet MURAD see: Lebeteay 2) elas nN, 4 EPP Dike tse, anh ae 7) - ia Leip | ie Pe Py i, Ona) Seti: ec ATL Meet Bh mg hahah need plu sats te ts, fy} eran ee 4 i \h va ns enctia? ; Walls Aunity ty dim See Carers. - oe 4 ha . r ny of aa bee i b) ¥ aif ° uy a) N. A. H. MILLARD _ THE HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST > GOASTS OF SOUTH AFRIGA. PART III. THE GYMNOBLASTEA AND SMALL FAMILIES OF ; CALYPTOBLASTEA MUS. COMP. ZOOL. LIBRARY AUG 12 1966 June 1966 Junie UNIVERSITY. Volume 48 Band Part 118 Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post tree) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1, 2(1, 3, 5, 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t--p.l.), 5(2, 5, 7-9): 6(1, t-p.i.), 7(1, 3) 8, (1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7; t.-p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44(4)- Price of this part / Prys van hierdie deel R1.05 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap ji —— ; Aimee — . : ) Sat —CLoyer Towns THE HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA. PART III. THE GYMNOBLASTEA AND SMALL FAMILIES OF CALYPTOBLASTEA Petree’ . WiUS, COMP. eM Na fe LIBRA ne ARY € » N. A. H. Mitiarp AUG l2 1O86 Koology Department, University of Cape Town MARY a, O, UNIVERSIT (With 15 text-figures and 1 plate) ny CONTENTS PAGE Introduction : : ‘ ‘ = OT Station List . ; ‘ : : . 428 List of Species. : ‘ ‘ - ‘433 Tubulariidae : ; ‘ ; . 434 Myriothelidae . : ; : . 435 Corynidae . : , ‘ : . 440 Solanderiidae ; 3 ; ' - 444 Bougainvilliidae . : ‘ : - 49 Clavidae_. ‘ ; ; ; » 452 Eudendriidae : 3 : : - 454 Hydractiniidae . : ; é 5. RG Pandeidae . : : ; s AGI Aequoreidae ; . ; ‘ =) 461 Lovenellidae : ‘ ; : . 464 Haleciidae . P : : : . 464 Campanulariidae . : : é gaze Summary . ; : : : 2+ 404 Acknowledgements : ; : . 484 References . ‘ . 5 ; -,) 404 INTRODUCTION This paper represents the third and final part of a systematic account of _ the hydroids from that part of the South African coast stretching from South _ West Africa on the west to the southern border of Natal on the east. For details on the origin of the collections the reader is referred to the introduction to part I of the series (Millard, 1962). : When examining Gymnoblast hydroids one must bear in mind that a _ considerable quantity of the more delicate material brought up by dredging _ becomes destroyed by rough handling or is so badly damaged that identification beyond the genus level is impossible. Moreover most genera require the presence _ of gonophores, usually female, for identification to species level. This applies . particularly to such genera as Eudendrium and Tubularia. It is felt that no useful ‘ Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (18), 1966: 427-487, 15 figs., 1 pl. 427 a 428 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM purpose would be served by including dubious records and, at the risk of giving a false impression of the abundance, poorly preserved material and sterile material of doubtful specific identification has generally been omitted. The author wishes to express thanks to the following: the South African Museum for permission to examine the collection of the s.s. Pieter Faure, the Zoology Department of the British Museum of Natural History for accommoda- tion and permission to examine their collection in 1960, Dr. W. Engelhardt of the Munich Museum and Dr. J. S. Pringle of the Natal Museum for the loan of type material, Dr. M. E. Thiel of the Hamburg Museum for identifica- tion of certain medusae and finally all past and present members of the Zoology and Oceanography Departments of the University of Cape Town who have helped to accumulate material in the now very extensive University collection. Type specimens of new species have been deposited in the South African Museum and have been given a Museum registered number in addition to the University catalogue number. STATION LIST A. Littoral material from Oudekraal on the west coast of the Cape Peninsula. Position: 33°58°5'S/18°22-2’E. Date A 40 16.1.34 A 116-122 = 15,.3.34 A 139 17-3-34 A 353 A 383 13.5-34 A 384 25.83.34 A 405 18.10.34 AFR. Material dredged by the government research vessel, R.S. Africana. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom AFR 736 17.8.47 30°4.2°4.'S/15°59°2E 201 co gn S, Sh AFR 801 7.10.47 32°34°4.S/17°52°2'E 71 gn M,R AFR 866 9.1.48 34°36°8’S/19°16-4’E 38 R,S AFR 967 23.3.48 35°07'S/20°4.9’E gI £S AFR 985 5.4.48 34°4.7°4’S/20°19’E © 80 gn M AFR 994 19 4.48 34.°34°5'S/21°22°5'E 68 co S, Sh AFR 0002 6.6.49 33°10'S/17°57'E 73 B. Littoral material from Lambert’s Bay on the west coast. Date: July 1938. Position: 32°05'5/18°18’E. BMR. Bushman’s River Estuary, south coast, on sand and muddy banks. Date: 14.9.50. Position: 33°41'S/26°40’E. Depth: 2—4°5 m. BRE. Breede River Estuary, south coast, littoral. Date: 3.2.52. Position: 34°25,'S/20°51°5’E. | HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 429 CP. Littoral material from various localities on the west coast of the Cape Peninsula. Date Locality Position CP 325 20.9.48 Sea Point 33°55°2'S/18°22°6’E CP 327 16.12.48 Blaauwberg Strand 33°48'S/18°27-5’E CP 331 8.8.49 Kommetje 34°08°5’S/18°19°4’E CP 336 12.5.4.9 Oudekraal 33°58°5'S/18°22-2’E CP 378 3.6.52 Cape Town docks (on 33°54°5'S/18°25°5’E Squalus fernandinus ) CP 646 5.12.60 Oudekraal 33°58°5'S/18°22-2’E CPR. Material from various localities in the Cape Province. Date Locality Position Depth (m.) CPR 9 30.4.50 Glentana Strand 34.°04’S/22°20’E littoral CPR 46 20.6.59 Umgazi Bay 31°43’S/29°26’E 27 HAM. Keiskama River Estuary, Hamburg, on the south coast. Date: 9.1.50. Position: 33°17'S/27°32’E. HB. Littoral material from Hondeklip Bay on the west coast. Date: 8.2.40. Position: 30°19’S/17°16’E. _ KNY. Knysna Estuary on the south coast. Position: 34°05’'S/23°04’E (average). Date Depth (m.) Bottom KNY 30 16.7.47 5-7 M,S KNY 70 15.7.47 2-6 S KNY 164 9.7.50 0-3 M KNY 165 9.7.50 I-13 S KNY 176 11.7.50 Floating buoy KNY 212 7.7.60 O-1 Ss KNY 270 14.2.64 o-I M L. Littoral material from East London on the south coast. Position: 33°01’S/ 27°54'E. Date L 44 6.3.37 L 56-177 —.7-37 LAM. Dredged in Lambert’s Bay, west coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LAM. 24 16.1.57 32°04°6’S/18°18-15’E v7 R LAM 30 19.1.57 32°05°1'S/18°17-7’E 20 R LAM 35 19.1.57 32°05°5'S/18°17-7’E 27 R, Sh LAM 46 22.13.57 32°04°4’S/18°17-7’E 23 R LAM 50 23.1.57 32°08'5’S/18°17°7’E 16 R,S LAM 52 Q1.1.57 32°04.7'S/18°18-2’E 17 Ss LAM 59 23.1.57 32°09’S/18°18’E 16 R,S LB. Langebaan Lagoon, west coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LB 127 26.4.48 33°05°6’S/18°01-6’E Littoral R LB 166 15.7.46 33°09'0'S/18°03°4’E 7 LB 266 3.5.51 33°07°4’S/18°02+1’E Littoral N) 430 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LB 296 5.5.51 33°04'S/18°00’E Ship’s hull LB 314 4.5.51 33°05°7'S/18°01°5’E Littoral R LB 371 7.5.53 33°05°7'S/18°01'5’E Littoral R LB 378 7.553 33°05°9'S/18°01°9’E O-1 Wooden piling LB 380 7.5.53 33°06-7'S/18°01:0’E 4 S, Sh LB 386 8.5.53 33°06°5'S/18°02’E Ship’s hull LB 398 24.7.53 33°07°1'S/18°02:9’E O-1 S LB 403 5.12.53 33°10'S/18°03°5’E Littoral M LB 542 4.5.60 r Littoral LB 556 22 7,08 33°07°3'S/18°03-0’E Littoral Wooden piling LIZ. Dredged in Algoa Bay, Port Elizabeth, south coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom LIZ 2 5.4.54 33°55°7.9/24°37°2 E 9 LIZ 3 5-4..54 33°56°1'S/25°40’E 17 S LIZ 7 6.4.54 33°58-1'S/25°38-9’E 9 R, St LIZ 11 6.4.54 33°57°2'S/25°38-0’E 9 Clay, R LIZ 13 6.4.54 33°58°2'S/25°38-8’E 7 S LIZ 16 7.4.54 33°58°4'S/25°40°5’E 14 St LIZ 24-25 11.4.54 34.°00°4'S/25°44°5’E 39 co S, Sh LIZ 40 11.4.54 34.°00°8’S/25°42°4’E 6 R LU. Littoral material from Luderitz Bay, South West Africa. Date Position LU 59 24.2.63 26°38’S/15°05'5’E LU 113-118 = 22.2..63 26°38’S/15°09°3’E MB. Dredged in Mossel Bay, south coast. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom MB 8-12 12.1.56 34.°04°3'S/22°13°9'E 19 R MB 19 13.1.56 34.°08-7'S/22°07-2’E 13 R, S, Sh MB 25 13.1.56 34°09'°3'S/22°10°1’E 29 S MB 37 16.1.56 34.°09°3'5/22°10°:0’E 31 N) MB 47 17.1.56 34°11°3S/22°10:0'E 10 R MB 52 17.1.56 34.°11°0'S/22°09°9’E 14 RS MB 55 17.1.56 34.°10°7'S/22°09'6’E 9 R MB 60 18.1.56 34.°04°3'S/22°14:2’E 18 R, co S, Sh MB 64 18.1.56 34.°04°8/S/22°13°1’E 26 R, co S, Sh MB 69 19.1.56 34.°08-6'S/22°07°3’E 13 RSs ses MB 70 19.1.56 34.°08-9’S/22°07-9’E 18 S MB 81 20.1.56 34°06-2’S/22°10-9’E 27 M MB 84 21.1.56 34°11°4’S/22°10°1’E 29 R MB 88 18.1.56 34.°04°8/S/22°13-1’E 26 R, co S, Sh OLF. Olifant’s River Estuary, west coast. Date: 23.1.55. Position: 31°42’S/ 18°15’E. PP. Littoral material from Paternoster, west coast. Date: 24.9.57. Position: 32°43'S/17°55 E. SAMH. Material from the collection of the South African Museum. Specimens 147-352 and 361-383 were dredged by the s.s. Pieter Faure. Their positions were given in the original records as compass bearings off salient points HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 431 on the coast, and were probably not very accurate. These have been converted into latitude and longitude and are given to the nearest minute. SAMH 147 SAMH 157-162 SAMH 166-170 SAMH 174-177 SAMH 179-180 SAMH 189 SAMH 202-203 SAMH 214 SAMH 221-227 SAMH 230-233 SAMH 235 SAMH 239-247 SAMH 250-253 SAMH 269-274 SAMH 283 SAMH 296 SAMH 315 SAMH 327-328 SAMH 335-338 SAMH 341-343 SAMH 351-352 SAMH 357 SAMH 361 SAMH 380-383 SAMH 404 SAMH 405-408 Date 23.6.1898 15.7.1898 11.11.1898 19.11.1898 22.12.1898 28.12.1898 7-3-1899 24.3.1899 19.6.1899 20.9.1899 5-7-1900 11.10.1900 15.7.1901 17.7.19OI 25.7.1901 13.8.1901 10.9.1901I 22.9.1904 4.10.1904 19.10.1904 22.8.1905 19.6.1914 11.11.1898 15.3.1899 —.4.1962 —.7.1962 Position South of Mossel Bay 34°08’S/22°16’E 33°49'S/25°56’E 33°45'S/26°44E 32°52’S/28°12’E 33°09’S/28°03’E 33°59'S/25°51E 33°50'S/26°35’E 34°26'S/21°42’E 34°15'S/22°10°5’E 34°27'S/20°58’E 34°08'S/22°59°5’E 33°13°5'S/27°58’E 33°07'S/27°47°5'E 32°50’S/28°18-5’E 32°47'S/28°28’E 33°54'S/26°51’E 34°12’S/22°15°5’E 34°12’S/22°15°5’E 34°15°5'S/22°14’E 33°52’S/26°09’E 33°55'S/18°27’E 33°49'S/25°56’E 33°47'5/26°19’E 28°30’S/16°10’E 28°30’S/16°10’E SB. Saldanha Bay, west coast. SB 132 SB 153-168 SB 174 SB 178 SB 196 SB 231 SB 235 SB 267 SB 269 Date 26.3.53 —9-57 27-4-59 28.4.59 1.5.59 4.5.60 4.5.60 25.4.62 25.4.62 Position 33°04'S/17°59°3’E 33°02°5S/18°02’E 33°02°8’S/18°00-6’E 33°03°6’S/18°00-4’E 33°04°4'S/17°56-4’E 33°00°6’S/17°59°6’E 33°04°1'S/17°59°7'E 33°02’S/17°57°2’E 33°02°1'S/17°58’E SCD. Dredged off the south coast. SCD 5 SCD 20 SCD 22 SCD 26 SCD 29 SCD 37 SCD 50 SCD 52 SCD 56 SCD 60 SCD 61 SCD 75 SCD 79-81 Date 19.4.58 26.5.58 26.5.58 23.5.58 22.6.58 19.5.58 18.5.58 20.8.58 19.8.58 16.8.58 15.89.58 - 16.7.59 16.7.59 Position 34°15'S/25°05’E 34°07°3'S/23°23'8’E 34°26-7’S/23°26-0’E 33°47'S/26°04’E 33°38°6'S/26°54°7’E 32°15°2'S/28°57-7'E 31°38°8S/29°34°4’E 34°01°S/25°45°5'E 33°37'S/26°56-6’E 33°02S/27°56-2’E 32°17°7'S/28°54°5'E 32°33'S/28°38’E 32°43'S/28°28’E Depth (m.) 73-78°5 86 24-27 gI Depth (m.) 8 Littoral 15 15 35 Depth (m.) Bottom St brk Sh brk Sh, St f£S £S M M S, Sh, St Bottom 432 SCD 84-85 SCD 94 SCD 111 SCD 112 SCD 113 SCD 114 SCD 117-118 SCD 119 SCD 126 SCD 129-133 SCD 154 SCD 169 SCD 175 SCD 179 SCD 188 SCD 190 SCD 206 SCD 215 SCD 239 SCD 258 SCD 265 SCD 276 SCD 281-283 SCD 284 SCD 312 SCD 314 SCD 328 SCD 330 SCD 333 SCD 347 SCD 354 SCD 387 SCD 394 SH. Cape Town docks, from pylons and cable below tug jetty. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Date 17-7-59 20.7.59 23-7-59 20.7.59 26.11.59 26.11.59 14.2.60 14.2.60 3.6.60 3.6.60 25.11.60 24.11.60 30.11.60 24.11.60 30.11.60 29.11.60 30.11.60 25.11.60 29.11.60 14.7.61 14.7.61 14.7.61 11.2.62 6.2.62 9.2.62 9.2.62 10.2.62 11.2.62 11.2.62 12.2.62 11.10.62 8.12.62 2.12.62 Position 33°03'5/27°55E 33°55'5'9/25°51'E 34°35'S/21°11’E 33°55°5'9/25°51'E 34°24'S/21°45’E 34°29'S/21°49°5'E 34.°24'S/21°46’E 34°33'S/21°52’E 34°26°5'S/21°48’E 34.°48'S/22°06’E 34°03'S/25°59'E 33°58-9/S/25°41°4’E 34°20'S/23°31’E 33°58°9/S/25°41°4’E 34°10'S/23°32’E 34.°05'8'S/23°23°2’E 34°51'S/23°41E 34°03 'S/25°58’E 34.°02:0'8/23°28-4’E 33°53°8'S/25°42°5'E 33°48'S/25°47'E 33°53°8'S/25°42'5'E 34°04'S/23°23’E 33°01'S/27°55'E 33°58'S/25°4.7'E 33°58'S/25°43’E 34°43'S/25°40’E 34°03'5'S/23°23E 34°02'S/23°27’E 34°10'S/22°15’E 32°08’S/29°12’E 34°04°4'S/23°25'6’E 33°50°7'S/25°47°5/E Date SH 433 14.4.61 SH 436 3.4.62 Depth (m.) Floating buoy {S$ M M R R,S STJ. St. John’s River Estuary, eastern coast of Cape Province. Date: 20.1.50 Position: 31°37'S/29°37’E. Estuary, south coast. Date: SWD. Dredged off the coast of South West Africa. SUN. Sunday’s River 33°42'S/25°53E. Date SWD 12 10.2.63 SWD 39 12.2.63 SWD 42 13.2.63 Position 26°35'S/15°o1’E 26°37°5'S/15°04'5'E 26°38:0’S/15°00°2’E TB. Dredged from Table Bay, Cape Town. TB 6 TB 7-8 Date 4.8.46 25.10.46 Position 33°49°5/S/18°27°5E 33°52°5'S/18°27°5’E Depth (m.) 71 40 7% Depth (m.) 13 17 7.1.50. Position: Bottom ann Bottom S, Sh S Sh HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 433 Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom TB9 25.10.46 33°52'S/18°28’E 15 S TB 13 4.8.46 33°49°5'S/18°27°5’E 13 S, Sh TB 14 25.10.46 33°52°5'9/18°27°5’E L7 S, Sh TB 15 11.2.47 33°4.7°5'S/18°24°3’E 19 S, Sh, St TB 16 25.10.46 33°52’S/18°28’E 15 N) EB 17 26.6.47 33°52°7'9/18°28-7’E 9 S, St TB 19 a 7A7 33°51°2'S/18°27-3/E 23 R,S TB 21 15.12.57 33°48-6’S/18°24°6’E 15 S, Sh, St. TRA. Material collected by commercial trawlers. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom TRA 32 Q.11.47 34°49’S/20°21°5’E c. QI TRA 33 20.7.49 34°55'S/21°10’E c. gO R,S TRA 35 21.1.50 34°34’S/20°50’E 70 M,S TRA 38 —.7.50 34.°30'S/20°56’E 73 M,S TRA 42 —.7.51 34°30'S/20°55’E Cc. 70 M, St TRA 56 28.11.52 34°40'S/21°35’E 73 RS TRA 57 27.11.52 34°24'5/21°55’E 59 TRA 59 26.11.52 34°28'S/21°45’E 70 S, St TRA 86 233.53 32°41°7’S/17°58°5E 9 N) TRA 92 —.1.54 35°03’S/21°50’E 110 R,S TRA 99 18.1.56 34°25'5'S/21°50°2’E 60 S TRA 150 6.3.58 34.°42°2’S/20°25:0’E gl M TRA 156 15.10.58 34°12’S/18°22’E 22 Cable TRA 159 6.7.58 33°56’S/25°36’E Turtle WCD. Dredged off the west coast of the Cape Province. Date Position Depth (m.) Bottom WCD 7 24.3-59 34° 09°3'S/18°17'5’E 43 R WCD 12 24.3.59 34°09°4'S/18°16°5’E 75 R WCD 18 29.4.59 33°05'6'S/17°54°5E 64 kh M WCD 20 30.4.59 33°07°5'S/17°52°5’E 86 R WCD 25 1.5.59 33°06°5'S/17°55°4’E 86 en M WCD 81 15.9.49 34°05’S/18°21’E II S WCD 125 23.4.62 33°08’S/17°46’E 157 gen M WCD 134 25.4.62 33°07°3'S/17°57°5/E 26 S WCD 145 29.8.63 33°50°3'S/18°23°2’E 15 R WCD 156 22.10.63 34.°01°7'S/18°14°7’E 100 R WCD 158-160 21.10.63 33°55°8'S/18°21°3’E 37 R WCD 164 7.10.63 32°52’S/18°25’E 29 R LisT OF SPECIES Family Tubulariidae Tubularia solitaria Warren, 1906. Tubularia warrent Ewer, 1953. Family Myriothelidae Monocoryne minor n. sp. Myriothela tentaculata n. sp. Myriothela capensis Manton, 1940. Family Corynidae Bicorona elegans, n.g., n.sp. Staurocladia vallentini (Browne, 1902). Sarsia eximia (Allman, 1859). 4 434 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Family Solanderiidae Solanderia procumbens (Carter, 1873). Family Bougainvilliidae Bimeria vestita Wright, 1859. Bougainvillia macloviana (Lesson, 1836). Bougainvillia sp. Dicoryne conferta (Alder, 1856). Rhizorhagium robustum (Warren, 1907). Family Clavidae Clava sp. Merona cornucopiae (Norman, 1864). Family Eudendriidae Eudendrium ?capillare Alder, 1856. Eudendrium ?carneum Clarke, 1882. Eudendrium deciduum Millard, 1957. Eudendrium ramosum (Linn., 1758). Family Hydractiniidae HAydractinia altispina Millard, 1955. — Hydractinia kaffraria Millard, 1955. Hydrocorella africana Stechow, 1921. Podocoryne carnea M. Sars, 1846. Family Pandeidae Leuckartiara octona (Fleming, 1823). Family Aequoreidae Aequorea africana n. sp. Family Lovenellidae Lovenella chiquitita Millard, 1957. Family Halectidae Halecium beanii (Johnston, 1838). Halecium delicatulum Coughtrey, 1876. Halecium dichotomum Allman, 1888. Halecium halecinum (Linn., 1758). Halecium ?muricatum (Ellis & Sol., 1786). Halecium tenellum Hincks, 1861. Family Campanulariidae Campanularia hincksi Alder, 1856. Campanularia integra MacGill., 1842. Campanularia laminacarpa n. sp. Campanularia ?mollis (Stechow, 1919). Campanularia morgansi Millard, 1957. Clytia hemisphaerica (Linn , 1767). Clytia hummelincki (Leloup, 1935). Clytia paulensis (Vanh6ffen, 1910). Obelia dichotoma (Linn., 1758). Obelia geniculata (Linn., 1758). Family Tubulariidae Tubularia solitaria Warren, 1906. Tubularia solitaria Warren, 1906: 83, pl. 10, 11. Millard, 1957: 179. Records. West coast: A 122. LB 166 (recorded by Day, 1959). SB 153U. South coast: L 172. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 435 Tubularia warrent Ewer, 1953 Tubularia warreni Ewer, 1953: 351, fig. 1-4. Millard, 19594: 299. Millard, 1959): 240. Records. West coast: LB 296A, 386A (reported by Day, 1959). South coast: CPR 9G. KNY 176A (reported by Day, Millard and Harrison, 1952, as T. ?betheris). Description. This material conforms to previous descriptions of the species with the exception of the CPR sample which differs in its paler coloration. The general effect, when alive, was a creamy colour, with pink tinges in the manubrium and gonophores. It is obviously a young colony, reaching a maximum height of 1-75 cm., and the largest hydranths measuring only about 2:5 mm. in length and 1 mm. in basal diameter. The blastostyles are unbranched and few in number (5-9) though fully mature gonophores are present. Apart from the colour there is nothing to distinguish it from TJ. warreni. Family Myriothelidae Monocoryne minor n. sp. Fig. 1 Material. The holotype, SCD 215Q, is a single specimen detached from its substratum and the only specimen known. Most of the colour has gone, though signs of a dark-red pigmentation are visible on the gonophores. South African Museum registered number: SAMH 410. Description. Polyp measuring approximately 5 mm. in length, though somewhat contracted and curled up. Basal part of body (1 mm.) covered in transparent perisarc which is continued proximally in a number of threads and filaments, some of which appear to be filled with living coenosarc. Remainder of body cylindrical, bearing about 110 capitate tentacles. Tentacles solitary or arranged in groups of 2, 3, or 4 united at their bases. Length of tentacles variable: sometimes the middle one of a group of three is the largest as in M. gigantea, but sometimes all members of the group are equal in length and sometimes the first of a group of four is longest. Eleven gonophores, apparently male, borne irregularly on the body of the polyp, the largest about 0-3 mm. in diameter. Gonophores pear-shaped, not distinctly demarcated from pedicel. Nematocysts. At least three kinds visible in smears of preserved material: (1) Desmonemes, the most abundant type. Capsule oval, thread with about 2 complete coils, on which a spiral ridging is visible. Size variable: 9:0-13°5 x 6:3-10°8 p. (ii) Stenoteles, fairly common. Capsule egg-shaped, with shaft occupying about half length. 15:3-18-0 & 13:0-15'3 mp. (iii) Undetermined heteronemes, rare. Capsule elongated, with shaft occupying about 2 length. 16-2-18-9 x 6-3—7°6 p. Remarks. As there is only one specimen available no sections were cut and accurate measurements could not be made without damage. A few detached 436 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fic. 1. Monocoryne minor n. sp. A. The whole animal (holotype). B. A typical group of 4 tentacles. C-F. Nematocysts. (C, stenotele. D, undetermined heteroneme. E—F, desmonemes). tentacles were used for examination of nematocysts. The specimen is fairly well preserved, but there is no knowing how many tentacles may have been broken off during handling, or whether the base was originally attached to a firm substratum. Since the tip of the body is curled over, the mouth could not be observed. » HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 437 The arrangement of the tentacles differs from that in the only two known _ species of Monocoryne, namely M. gigantea (Bonnevie, 1898) and M. bracteata (Fraser, 1941), in both of which the middle one of a group is the largest. It is also much smaller than either of them. The gonophores are not seated in the axils of the tentacles but distributed at random over the body. Myriothela capensis Manton, 1940 Mpyriothela capensis Manton, 1940: 276, pl. 1 (figs. 12, 13), pl. 3 (fig. 27), figs. 7, 8b, 9. Millard, 1957: 186. Records. West coast: CP 331 (one almost mature male specimen attached to weed). LAM 52F (one mature female specimen attached to weed). LU 118Y (two mature male specimens torn from their base and two young specimens on crustacean appendage). Description. The material from Luderitz Bay (LU 118Y) had retained its colour after about four months in spirit. The whole distal end of the body was a vivid splash of colour—the capita of the body tentacles and tips of the gonophores bright magenta, shading to pink on the stalks and colourless on the base of the polyp. Specimens preserved for a longer period are pale pink or completely colourless. Largest specimen 1-6 cm. in length. Structure and nematocysts as described by Manton. One mature female specimen with actinulae larvae (one gonophore on opening contained three larvae). Female gonophores reaching o-g x 1-0 mm. Myriothela tentaculata n. sp. Fig. 23 Material. WCD 7Q: 5 specimens from west coast attached to encrusting polyzoan, two of them rather badly damaged and the others in various states of preservation. The best preserved was selected as the holotype and another was used for sectioning. South African Museum registered number of holotype: SAMH 411. Description of holotype. Total length 2-5 cm. No colour left in specimen except for a circle of dark-red spots round the distal end of each gonophore. Basal region of hydranth (8 mm.) naked and drawn out into an irregular shape, bearing about g chitinoid, flattened, adhesive discs attached to the substratum. Above this a single whorl of 17 long, tapering blastostyles reaching a maximum length of about 2 cm. These are generally somewhat coiled and bear a superficial resemblance to the tentacles of an octopus. They are the most distinctive feature of the species. Blastostyle unbranched, bearing 4-6 gono- phores in the proximal 5 mm., of which the most distal is the oldest and the others in various stages of development. Capitate tentacles present amongst the gonophores and others (about 25) scattered irregularly over the distal region of the blastostyle. Tentacles rather poorly developed and resembling boot-buttons. Gonophores male, spherical, reaching a diameter of about 438 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 2 mm., each with a very short pedicel and 8-10 pigmented spots around distal end. Distal region of hydranth (about % of length) covered with densely packed capitate tentacles and bearing a terminal mouth. Tentacles well-developed, with slender stalks and large capituli, but more poorly developed in the region of the blastostyles. Nematocysts. Four types distinguishable from smears and sections: (i) ‘Heteronemes’ (fig. 2D), elongated and banana-shaped, with an axial body which stains redin Mallory’s stain and a fine much-coiled thread. 44°1-45°9 x 8-1 p. (11) Desmonemes of two sizes (fig. 2E-H), the larger 17-1-18-0 x 12-6— 14°4 pw, the smaller 10-2-10°8 x 7-2—7-7 w. In both, part of the thread stains red in Mallory’s stain, the rest remains unstained. It bears a distinct spiral marking which may indicate the presence of barbs. The larger form contains a thread in 3 complete longitudinal coils and the smaller a thread in 2 coils. (iii) Steroteles (fig. 2C). Oval capsules containing a butt which stains red in Mallory’s stain and increases in diameter towards the base. The thread is coiled transversely in the lower half of the capsule and forms an opaque mass in this region. A few were found exploded and showed a characteristic butt, though the thread and spines had been broken off. 14°4. X 10° p. (iv) Atrichous isorhizas (fig. 2B). Elongated capsules with the contents difficult to discern, but apparently containing a long tangled thread which stains faintly blue in Mallory’s stain. 15-3-19°8 Xx 4:0-7°2 p. Mistology. The hydranth body wall (fig. 2M) is very similar in structure to that of M. capensis. It is 110-180 p thick, with a fairly thin layer of mesogloea 10-20 pw thick from which slender lamellae bearing muscle fibres project into the ectoderm. The lamellae arise at intervals of approximately 14 » and are 40-80 p» deep. From the endoderm arise villi anything up to 1 mm. in depth, each containing a very thin supporting lamella of mesogloea. The apical cells of the villi contain dark-staining granules, but the remainder are clear and vacuolated. 85 villi were counted in one section. In the region of the mouth the granular cells are more numerous and many cells contain droplets of a yellowish material. | The body tentacles (fig. 2K) are exactly like those of M. capensis as described by Manton (1940), with an apical pad of mesogloea fibrils about 50 » in thickness and a central cavity which passes into the stalk without constriction. The endoderm of the stalk is separated from that of the hydranth body by a thin layer of mesogloea. The capita of the tentacles are richly armed with nematocysts of all 4 types, of which desmonemes are the most numerous. The blastostyle is the most distinctive structure in the species. In the proximal region where the gonophores arise the endoderm bears villi which HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 439 20 Bea SS EEE << \ zh i PX Fic. 2. Myriothela tentaculata n. sp. A. The whole animal (holotype). B-H. Nematocysts. (B, atrichous isorhiza. C, stenotele. D, ‘heteroneme’. E and F, large desmoneme in side view and end-on view. G and H, small desmoneme in end-on view and side view.) t.s. blastostyle in proximal region with young male gonophore arising from it. l.s. body tentacle. ls. blastostyle tentacle. t.s. through body-wall of hydranth in distal region including the origin of 2 tentacles. (e, ectoderm. enb, endoderm of bell. m, mesogloea. ml, mesogloeal lamella. mp, apical pad of mesogloeal fibrils. n, nematocysts. se, subumbrella ectoderm. sp, spermatogenic cells. v, endodermal villi). Sr AS 440 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM project into the central cavity and fill it almost completely (fig. 2J). The cells of the villt are densely packed with granules which stain red in Mallory’s stain, and many of the granules float freely in the interstices between the villi. The mesogloea bears lamellae about 20 » deep on its ectodermal surface. The ectoderm contains many developing nematocysts which are particularly abundant around the origins of the tentacles. In the slender distal part of the blastostyle ectoderm and mesoderm are normal and well-preserved, but the endoderm appears to be largely senile. Although remains of villi and their mesogloeal lamellae can be recognised, most of the internal cavity is filled with dead cells and fragments of cells most of which have an opaque yellowish coloration. The blastostyle tentacles (fig. 2L) are similar to those of the body, but each has a much shorter stalk and a thinner pad of mesogloeal fibrils (about 20 p thick in maximum). The lumen is very narrow and the endoderm separated from that of the blastostyle by a basal lamella of mesogloea. The superficial layer of the capitum is densely packed with nematocysts, including ‘heteronemes’ and atrichs, while desmonemes and stenoteles appear to be entirely absent. The structure and development of the gonophore is similar to that in other species (Briggs, 1929, 1931; Manton, 1940). Only male gonophores are present and the largest one sectioned is 1-24 mm. in diameter with a layer of spermatogenic cells 0-24 mm. thick around the spadix. It is apparently almost mature, for a velar invagination is present in the exumbrella ectoderm though not yet perforate. The endoderm of the spadix bears rounded villi which project into the central cavity which is continuous with that of the blastostyle. Remarks. Of the six southern hemisphere species listed by Manton, (p. 288) this species is most closely related to M. capensis. It differs from it in its larger size, its adhesive structures, which are less obviously tentacular, and its long and tendril-like blastostyles. The nature of the nematocysts supports the establishment of a new species. All are larger than the corresponding types in M. capensis, the banana-shaped ‘heteronemes’ being enormous, about 4 times those of M. capensis and over twice those of M. penola and M. cocksi. The presence of atrichs in the hydranth is unusual since in other species this type is confined to the actinula. The term ‘heteroneme’ has been used following Manton, although the only evidence that this type possesses a distinct butt is that of Allman (1876), and needs confirmation. No haplonemes could be identified in this material, and if present cannot be distinguished from stenoteles. Family Corynidae Genus Bicorona nov. gen. Diagnosis. Corynidae with firm perisarc and upright, monopodially branched stems. Hydranths with two whorls of capitate tentacles. Gonophores in the form of fixed sporosacs borne on the body of the hydranth. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 441 Bicorona elegans nov. sp. Fig. 3 Types and records. Holotype: SB 161X (South African Museum registered number: SAMH 412), from Saldanha Bay on the west coast. Other records: A 116, 139, 353 (west coast); L 44, 56 (south coast). Description of holotype. A luxuriant colony of upright branching stems reaching a maximum height of 5-8 cm., growing in the lower intertidal region of the shore. Hydrorhiza embedded in sponge, branching and giving rise to upright stems. Stem unfascicled, with monopodial growth and terminal hydranths. Branches arising alternately, either bearing one terminal hydranth, or rebranching in a manner similar to the stem. Stem and branches covered with firm perisarc which is closely annulated throughout except for a smooth area on the origin of each branch. Hard part of perisarc terminating just below hydranth, but continued as a gelatinous layer onto the base of the hydranth. Hydranth Tubularia-like, with two whorls of capitate tentacles. Aboral tentacles 10-21 in number in mature hydranths, usually with long and short tentacles alternating. Oral tentacles short, 4-7 in number. ‘Neck’ region of hydranth (below aboral tentacles) with indistinct longitudinal striations. Gonophores in form of fixed sporosacs, borne on approximately 7 short blastostyles which form a whorl just distal to the aboral tentacles. Gonophores oval to spherical, 2-4 to a blastostyle, the oldest one terminal. Histology (fig. 3K). Stem normal, with no endodermal canals, terminating in a swollen region in the last perisarcal segment. ‘Neck’ region of hydranth with longitudinally ridged ectoderm, surrounded by thick gelatinous sheath continuous with the perisarc of the stem. Hydranth expanding at level of aboral tentacles, with spacious enteron. Ectoderm of hydranth normal. Endoderm specialized: immediately below aboral tentacles thickened and granular but with no indication of parenchyma, in the region between the two whorls of tentacles folded inward around sup- porting strands of mesogloea in the nature of endodermal villi, in region of hypostome thickened. Tentacles solid, with central core of ‘chordal’ endoderm. Aboral tentacles with no ‘supporting lamella’ of mesogloea, and endoderm continuous with that of hydranth. Oral tentacles attached obliquely to hydranth body, with a ‘supporting lamella’ of mesogloea which may be incomplete in its aboral region. Blastostyle hollow and tubular. Gonophores with a hollow spadix, without subumbrella cavity or radial canals. Female gonophore containing many small eggs arranged in a single series around the spadix (counts give numbers varying froma 29 to 84). Eggs 0:05-0:10 mm. in diameter. Male gonophore containing a thick mass of spermatogenic cells. Nematocysts (fig. 3H, J) all stenoteles, of 2 sizes: large ones reaching 5 442 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Fic. 3. Bicorona elegans n. sp. A. Two complete stems from the holotype. B-G. Stages in the development of the hydranth (B-F from A 139, G a mature hydranth from the holotype). Hand J. Small, and large, stenotele from A 116. K. l.s. hydranth with female gonophores from L 44. HYDROZOA OF THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS OF SOUTH AFRICA 443 26 X 17p, small ones reaching 13:5 hex INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLE or CoNnTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. x 7 in. (7$ in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers) first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Smrru, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmirH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. Jn Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 (= natalensis West). ny Ne A. HH: MILLARD HYDROIDS OF THE VEMA SEAMOUNT November 1966 November Volume 48 Band Part. 19 | Deel DEC 30 1966 MARV arn UNIVERSITY Ue ean lin bs oy ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM _Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 1, 2(1, 3, 5, 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, tp), 5(2, 5, 7-9), 6(1, t.—p.1.), 7(1, 3), 8, O(i-2); 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, t-p.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44@): Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel 20C Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap nec 30 1906 rink VAM UNIVERSITY. HYDROIDS OF THE VEMA SEAMOUNT By N. A. H. MiLiarp, Koology Department, University of Cape Town (With 1 figure in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Peivoduetion §; « te. «© ‘s) 52) 480 Systematic account Os. ee ea Discussion ‘ : } : , 404 Summary he pe Pe eae es Acknowledgements : : : - 495 References : ; f : ; ~ 495 INTRODUCTION The material recorded in this paper is part of a collection of benthic fauna made by the Department of Oceanography of the University of Cape Town and the Division of Sea Fisheries, Cape Town, in November, 1964. The Vema Seamount is situated in 31° 38’ South Latitude and 08° 20’ East Longi- tude, approximately 550 miles off the west coast of South Africa, and is surmounted by a plateau of about five square miles with a mean depth of 73 m. The hydroid material was obtained from a rocky bottom in depths varying from 42 to 61 m. and was part of a mixed community containing also sea-weeds, sponges, ascidians and holothurians. Further details of the expedition are reported by Simpson and Heydorn (1965). It is of interest that from a cursory examination of the fauna these authors remark on an apparent affinity with Tristan da Cunha. This was particularly evident in the fish, and the common rock-lobster (Jasus tristant), which is now being exploited commercially, is similar to that occurring in the Tristan area. The hydroid collection is the property of the South African Museum and will be lodged there. Family Haleciidae Halecium beani (Johnston, 1838) Three infertile samples, two from 54 m. and one from 61 m. Stems reaching a maximum height of 8-6 cm. 489 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (19), 1966: 489-496, 1 fig. 490 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Hydrodendron caciniformis (Ritchie, 1907) Fig. 1 Ophiodes caciniformis Ritchie, 1907: 500, pl. 23 (fig. 11, 12), pl. 24 (fig. 1). Hydrodendron caciniformis: Millard, 1957: 186, fig. 3. Ralph, 1958: 342, fig. 13b, c, 14a. Phylactotheca caciniformis: Pennycuik, 1959: 174. Ophiodissa caciniformis : Vervoort, 1959: 218, fig. 1, 2. One sample from 54 m. Stems reaching a maximum height of 0-9 cm., most of them unfascicled, though a few weakly fascicled at base. Structure of stem and hydrophore similar to the South African material, though dimensions on the whole slightly smaller. Gonophores borne in numbers on hydrorhiza. Elongated barrel-shaped, with short pedicel and truncated distal end, lightly annulated. Reaching 1°35 mm. in length and 0-58 mm. in maximum diameter. Male and female similar in appearance and distinguishable only under the microscope. Male Ear eee eS SE ee Imm. Fic. 1. Hydrodendron caciniformis A. Portion of stem. B. Male gonophore. Cand D. Female gonophores. HYDROIDS OF THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 491 generally slightly smaller than female. Blastostyle consisting of an elongated spadix bearing a single layer of rather flattened eggs in the female and a mass of spermatogenic cells in the male, the whole enveloped by a diffuse layer of tissue rich in large stenotele nematocysts. No hydranths present. Although gonothecae were described by Bale (1919), for Ophiodes australis, which Ralph suspects to be a synonym, they were not illustrated, and this is the first certain record of gonophores for H.. caciniformis. I cannot agree with Pennycuik that Ophiodissa expansa Fraser, 1948, from the Pacific coast of North America is a synonym. Not only does Fraser illustrate the nematotheca of this species without the everted rim which is so typical of H. caciniformis, but the gonophore is different. In O. expansa it is borne on the stem, is much more strongly annulated (‘very strongly crested rugosities’ : Fraser, 1948: 227) and has a narrower aperture. Family Campanulariidae Obelia geniculata (Linnaeus, 1758) One young infertile colony growing on weed from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 0-5 cm. Family Lafoeidae Lafoea fruticosa M. Sars, 1851 One small infertile colony from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 1:0 cm. Family Sertulariidae Amphisbetia bidens (Bale, 1884) One infertile colony from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 3-4 cm. Amphisbetia minima (d’Arcy Thompson, 1879) One colony, with gonophores, from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 0-6 cm. Dynamena quadridentata nodosa Hargitt, 1908 Two infertile samples growing on weed, both from 61 m. Maximum height of stem 0-6 cm. Parascyphus simplex (Lamouroux, 1816) Thyroscyphus tridentatus: Ritchie, 1909: 74, fig. 1. ar alae simplex: Splettstdsser, 1929: 126. Totton, 1930: 179, fig. 29. Ralph, 1961: 755, g. Ib. Two small infertile colonies from 42-50 and 54 m. Stems reaching a maximum height of 1-0 and 0-8 cm. respectively. Stem usually unbranched, but in some cases giving off one, or even two, lateral branches. Structure of stem and hydrothecae as in previous descriptions. This species has not been recorded from South Africa, but has been reported from Gough Island by Ritchie. Apart from this there are several records from Australasia and one from Great Britain, 492 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Salacia articulata (Pallas, 1766) One colony, with gonophores, from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 2°3 cm. Sertularella arbuscula (Lamouroux, 1816) Two very typical, though infertile, colonies from 54 and 61 m. Maximum height of stem 6-8 cm. Sertularella flabellum (Allman, 1886) Two infertile colonies from 61 and 54 m. Maximum height of stem 2-0 cm. Sertularella mediterranea Hartlaub, 1901 One infertile colony from 42-50 m., consisting of stems reaching a maxi- mum height of 2:3 cm., most of them with one lateral branch. Also a fragment from 54 m. Sertularella megista Stechow, 1923 One infertile colony from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 3-9 cm. Sertularia distans gracilis Hassall, 1848 Four infertile colonies growing on weed, two from 54 m. and two from 61 m. Maximum height of stem 0-4 cm. Also a colony with rather larger dimensions and of more doubtful identi- fication from 61 m. The stems in this sample reach a maximum height of 1:0 cm. The hydrothecae are larger than the normal material found on the South African coast (Millard, 1957, 1958, 1964), the internodes longer, and the typical basal hinge-joints are absent. One of the stems has a branch arising from the posterior surface. Sertularia marginata (Kirchenpauer, 1864) One infertile colony growing on weed from 54 m. Both simple and branched forms present. Maximum height of branching stem 1-7 cm. Family Plumulariidae (subfamily Halopterinae) Antennella quadriaurita Ritchie, 1909 Antenella quadriaurita Ritchie, 1909: 92, fig. 9. Antennella quadriaurita: Stechow, 1919: 113. Three infertile samples from 42-50, 54 and 61 m. and one fertile sample from 42-50 m. Stems reaching a maximum height of 2-2 cm., normally solitary, but some- times clustered together at base, and sometimes giving off up to four subsidiary branches. These branches arise quite irregularly, usually from the posterior surface of the basal athecate region, and successive branches never form the main axis of the stem as in Monostaechas faurei Millard, 1958. Stem with alternate HYDROIDS OF THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 493 thecate and athecate internodes, of which the athecate ones are longer in the basal region and the thecate in the distal region. Athecate internodes generally bearing two nematothecae each, but sometimes one, and only rarely three. Hydrotheca with depth and marginal diameter approximately equal. Other details as described by Ritchie. Gonothecae (not previously described) borne on thecate internodes just below hydrothecae, pear-shaped, with truncated distal end and wide spherical aperture, with two nematothecae on basal region (probably female). Pedicel of two segments. A. quadriaurita is known only from Gough Island and Havana. There is little to distinguish this species from A. africana Broch, 1914, other than the number of nematothecae borne on the athecate internodes. For the type material of A. quadriaurita from Gough Island Ritchie gives two to four, but generally three, and for the Havana material Stechow gives two. In A. africana there is normally only one, but occasionally two, and very rarely three. As shown in the following table, material from the Vema Seamount is inter- mediate between that from Gough Island and A. africana from South Africa. A. quadriaurita is retained as a separate species solely on the fact that most of the athecate internodes have more than one nematotheca, though it is likely that more material from the Atlantic will show a completely intergrading series, in which case it will be necessary to sink A. africana in the synonymy of A. quadriaurita. The gonophores of the two species are identical. Number of Number of nematothecae per I 2 3 4 internodes athecate internode examined Gough Island od -— 40% 55% 5% 20 (from Ritchie) | Vema Seamount... 23% 7a 2%, — go South Africa .. NaeoisG4 70 575% B22 % aa 506 Halopteris constricta Totton, 1930 Two samples, both from 54 m., one bearing gonophores. Maximum height of stem 0-8 cm. Family Plumulariidae (subfamily Plumulariinae) Plumularia pulchella Bale, 1882 Three samples, all from 54 m. The most luxurious colony has stems reaching a maximum height of 1-0 cm. and bears gonophores. Some of its stems bear one to three irregular lateral branches. Plumularia setacea (Linnaeus, 1758) Six samples, none of them luxurious, two from 42—50 m., three from 54 m. 494 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM and one from 61 m. Two samples bear gonophores, and the maximum height of the stem is 1:7 cm. Plumularia spinulosa Bale, 1882 Three samples, one from 42-50 m. and two from 54 m. Maximum height of stem 0-5 cm. Young gonophores present in one sample. Family Plumulariidae (subfamily Kirchenpauerinae) Pycnotheca mirabilis (Allman, 1883) One infertile sample from 42-50 m. Maximum height of stem 3-1 cm. Family Plumulariidae (subfamily Aglaopheniinae) Aglaophenia pluma pluma (Linnaeus, 1758) Six samples, one from 42-50 m., three from 54 m. and two from 61 m. Four of these colonies fertile and both male and female corbulae present. Stems reaching a maximum height of 2-4 cm. This material is of more delicate build than that found in South Africa, and in many cases the internodal septa and intrathecal septum are poorly developed or absent. The median nemato- theca is always short as shown by Broch (1933, fig. 18a). Lytocarpus filamentosus (Lamarck, 1816) Five samples, all infertile, one from 42-50 m., three from 54 m. and one from 61 m. Maximum height of stem g:0 cm. Discussion Of the 23 hydroid species here recorded, 21 also occur in South Africa and it appears that in the case of the hydroid fauna at any rate the two areas have close affinities with one another. Of the remaining two (Parascyphus simplex and Antennella quadriaurita) both have been reported from Gough Island in the South Atlantic by Ritchie, 1909. The hydroid fauna of the Tristan group of islands is, however, very poorly known, and it is probable that further investigation would show more species in common with the Vema Seamount. Further analysis shows that of the total 23 species 10 are cosmopolitan, namely: Halecium beaniu Obelia geniculata Lafoea fruticosa Amphisbetia minima (south of the Mediterranean) Dynamena quadridentata Sertularella mediterranea Sertularia distans gracilis Sertularia marginata HYDROIDS OF THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 495 Plumularia setacea Aglaophenia pluma pluma With these should probably be included Parascyphus simplex and Hydro- dendron caciniformis, which have a peculiar scattered distribution, the former being known from Australasia, Gough Island and the west coast of Scotland, and the latter from the Cape Verde Islands, Mediterranean, West Indies, tropical West Africa, Australasia and South Africa. Seven species have an Indo-Pacific distribution, namely: Amphisbetia bidens: Australia, Madagascar, South Africa. Sertularella arbuscula: Indian Ocean, Australia, South Africa. Halopteris constricta: New Zealand, South Africa. Plumularia pulchella: Australasia, South Africa. Plumularia spinulosa: Australasia, Japan, South Africa. Pycnotheca mirabilis: Australasia, Japan, west coast of North America, South Africa. Lytocarpus filamentosus: Australia, Madagascar, South Africa. Three species are so far known only from South Africa, namely: Salacia articulata Sertularella flabellum Sertularella megista One species has an Atlantic distribution, namely: Antennella quadriaurita: Gough Island, Havana. SUMMARY A total of 23 species of hydroids is recorded from the Vema Seamount. Of these the gonophores of Hydrodendron caciniformis and Antennella quadriaurita are described for the first time. The distribution of the species in the rest of the world is discussed. It is concluded that the affinities of the hydroid fauna are mainly with South Africa. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Trustees of the South African Museum gratefully acknowledge the receipt of a grant from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research towards the costs of publication. REFERENCES Bate, W. 1919. Further notes on Australian hydroids, IV. Proc. roy. Soc. Vict. 31: 327-361. Brocu, H. 1933. Zur Kenntnis der adriatischen Hydroidenfauna von Split. Skr. norske Vidensk-Akad., Mat.-natur. Kl. 1933 (4): 1-115. Fraser, C. McL. 1948. Hydroids of the Allan Hancock Pacific expeditions since March, 1938. Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. (1) 4: 179-335. Mitiarp, N. A. H. 1957. The Hydrozoa of False Bay, South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 43: 173-243. 496 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Mitiarp, N. A. H. 1958. Hydrozoa from the coasts of Natal and Portuguese East Africa. Part I. Calyptoblastea. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 44: 165-226. Miuuarp, N. A. H. 1964. The Hydrozoa of the south and west coasts of South Africa. Part II. The Lafoeidae, Syntheciidae and Sertulariidae. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48: 1-56. Pennycurk, P. R. 1959. Faunistic records from Queensland. Part V. Marine and brackish water hydroids. Pap. Dep. Zool. Univ. Qd. 1: 141-210. Raupu, P. M. 1958. New Zealand thecate hydroids. Part II. Families Lafoeidae, Lineo- lariidae, Haleciidae and Syntheciidae. Trans. roy. Soc. N.Z. 85: 301-356. RaupH, P. M. 1961. New Zealand thecate hydroids. Part III. Family Sertulariidae. Trans. roy. Soc. N.Z. 88: 749-838. RitcutE, J. 1907. On collections of the Cape Verde Islands marine fauna, made by Cyril Crossland, M.A.(Cantab.), B.Sc.(Lond.), F.Z.S., of St. Andrews University, July to September, 1904. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1907: 488-514. RITCHIE, J. 1909. Supplementary report on the hydroids of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb. 477: 65-101. Simpson, E. S. W. & Heyporn, A. E. F. 1965. Vema Seamount. Nature 207: 249-251. SPLETTSTOsSER, W. 1929. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Sertulariiden. Thyroscyphus Allm., Cnidos- cyphus nov. gen., Parascyphus Ritchie. Zool. Fb. 58: 1-134. StecHow, E. 1919. Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. 7-9), 6(1, t-p.i.), 7(1, 3), 8, g(1-2), 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, top.i.), 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 44@)- Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel 40c Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap mram Vv ARV UNIVERSITY. THE VALIDITY OF RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH, BASED ON A STUDY OF THE CLASPER By Pe ely ELEY South African Museum, Cape Town (With 8 figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Tee ees Reece Pe! tr: The Claspers of Myxopterygia. . . 498 Clasper of R. rhizacanthus (i) the external anatomy . : - 499 (i) ime intermal anafomy..,,.. +. . 560 Clasper of R. pullopunctata (i) the external anatomy . ‘ . 505 Gi the internal anatomy 00.) 505 Discussion . ; ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ . 508 memiowredrements, . 2) 2) «= / 3» BL3 RAE kk ee we lw at PpUERRiCes ait his ON io ELS URE ASE Os Al INTRODUCTION The present classification of South African skates is more or less tentative, for this difficult genus shows great variability in its morphological characters, which vary with age and/or sex in the individuals within the species. This high intraspecific variability probably accounts for the present inclusion of 95-100 species in the genus Raja. Several South African species have, as yet, proved to be indistinguishable from European species from the corresponding latitudinal belt in the northern hemisphere (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953), and it would appear that these pairs represent cases of ‘masked bipolarity’ (Ekman, 1953). But in very few cases have actual comparisons of the specimens from the two regions been made, although Norman (1935) has given some brief references. Raja alba, Lacépéde, from the N.E. Atlantic is reported here under the same name, but it appears to be cosmopolitan in distribution, being recorded from Morocco (Pietschmann, 1906), West Africa (Fowler, 1936) and Angola (da Franca, 1959). ANS) Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (20), 1966: 497-514, 8 figs. 498 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Norman expressed some doubt about the identification of R. batis from South Africa but the material he examined included a single stuffed specimen, on which accurate measurements were impossible. This South African species is now thought to be distinct from R. batis Linnaeus, and Smith (1964), on the basis of the shape, the presence of a single median spine and the general markings, has reclassified this skate as R. pullopunctata, although he points out that only juvenile material was examined. Raja rhizacanthus Regan, has been thought to be identical with the Euro- pean thorn-back skate R. clavata Linné, but this has been a matter of speculation. Barnard (1925) and Fowler (1940) have included R. rhizacanthus as a synonym of R. clavata, but Norman regarded the two as distinct species on the basis of spination and the position of the vent. This has been followed by Smith (1961). It is the purpose of this paper to compare and contrast certain morpho- logical characters, in the hope that the validity of these latter two South African species may be determined with greater certainty. Since skates show such great variations in external features, a more critical method of examination needs to be employed. Leigh-Sharpe (1920- 1926) has pointed out that in the genus Raja, individual species can be recog- nized by the morphological structures of their claspers. He has extended this further and has postulated the existence of pseudogenera (termed Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-raia, etc.), recognizable by the similar presence or absence of the clasper elements. Ishiyama (1958) has shown that in Japanese rajids, although intraspecific variations in the clasper can be recognized, the ‘external and internal structures of the clasper are species specific without exception’ (p. 224). On this basis he has also been able to postulate phyletic, generic and inter-specific relationships, and has concluded that ‘the characters in the male external organ (claspers) of the Japanese rajids seem to give the most reliable basis for the systematics of this group of fish’. (p. 243.) Hence it would appear that since the anatomy of the clasper is valid for the purposes of identification, it should also be valid for the purposes of com- parison of geographically separated species. However, ‘genitalic differences must be evaluated just like other characters’ (Mayr et al., 1953, p. 109), and so differences in the external and measurable characters of the specimens must also be taken into account. THE CLASPERS OR MyYXOPTERYGIA Comprehensive anatomical studies have been carried out on the claspers of European elasmobranchs by Petri (1878), Jungersen (1899) and Huber (1901). Two points of view were held as to the function of the claspers: that they were ‘holders’ (analogous to hands) was originally postulated, but they were later recognized as organs of intromission. Extensive study on the external | anatomy and the function of the clasper in the various elasmobranch groups has been made by Leigh-Sharpe, and further work on the function of the organ has been performed by Friedman (1935). RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 499 The nomenclature used in this paper is mainly in accordance with that of Leigh-Sharpe and Ishiyama, together with that of the above-mentioned authors. I Ag THE CLASPER OF R. RHIZACANTHUS REGAN The claspers from seven adult specimens of R. rhizacanthus, trawled off Cape Columbine and in False Bay, were examined. apopyle hypopyle slit Signal pseudorhipidion shield Sw 0-01 pseudosiphon sentinel * sentina | 2:0cms | spike Fic. 1. Raja rhizacanthus A, external view of right clasper from dorsal side; B, lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of glans. (i) The external anatomy of the clasper (fig. 1 A, B) The clasper of R. rhizacanthus is a moderately long, strongly built structure, the outer surface of which is entirely naked. Proximally the clasper is cylin- drical, but from about 1/3 its length from the distal end, it becomes broader and dorso-ventrally flattened, especially on its ventral surface. It tapers gradually towards its distal end and terminates in a broadly rounded, spatulate 500 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM tip. The ventral surface is pale and the dorsal surface tones with the general coloration of the body. The apopyle (fig. 1 A) is situated dorsally, some little distance behind the vent, and the appendix groove, arising from this point, runs across to the outer margin of the organ, and continues along the distal two-thirds of the lateral edge almost to the tip of the clasper. In some cases, due to the skin stretching across the dorsal terminal 1 cartilage, the groove may be seen from the dorsal side. Proximally the groove is bordered on by the two ‘scroll-like’ dorsal and ventral marginal cartilages, so that the edges of the groove closely approximate to form a tube, running from the apopyle to the hypopyle. Distally, from about half the clasper length, fleshy lips border the groove, and during erection, brought about by the powerful adductor muscles, and by vascular dilation (Friedman), these lips are opened and the structures of the clasper glans protrude (fig. 1 B). Two pouches are present on the dorsal surface of the concavity of the clasper glans (fig. 1 B), the smaller, more proximal slit and the larger, distal pseudosiphon. The median hypopyle is bordered dorsally by the pseudo- rhipidion, a plate-like structure employed as a splash-plate for ejaculating spermatozoa and distinguished from the rhipidion of Leigh-Sharpe in not being fan-shaped or pitted. Posterior to the hypopyle, and at about the same level as the pseudorhipidion, is a fleshy pad, the szgnal, which is capable of rotation about the longitudinal axis of the clasper. The sentinel is strongly developed and in older specimens its knife-like edge is exposed. There is a deep sentina situated distally, its inner border raised into a curved spike. The ventral shield is narrow and not well developed. The lining of the concavity is naked, scale and spine being absent. All these above-mentioned structures are associated with the cartilages of the terminal group. (ii) The internal anatomy of the clasper (figs. 2, 3) The skeleton of the clasper is a continuation, in the median axis, of the basipterygium of the fin, and is composed of two groups of cartilages, the basal group (including the basipterygium) and the terminal group. (a) The basal group (fig. 2) Ishiyama has pointed out, that in Japanese rajids, the basal group is not species specific, and, although White (1937) has proved that the number of proximal segments and other cartilages in the basal group tend to vary in large groups of the elasmobranchs, the basal group may only be used in phyletic considerations among the batoid fishes. Examination of the basal group of R. rhizacanthus seems to support this view, since the same seven cartilages are present as in the Japanese rajids (see Ishiyama, fig. 7). The basal group in R. rhizacanthus consists of the basipterygium, and b, and b, cartilages, the Beta-cartilage, and the axial cartilage, which extends RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 501 basipterygium j ES Fy \ Wk fi of Hy ‘ SS in rays b, cartilage beta cartilage dorsal marginal axial 4:0cms Fic. 2. Raja rhizacanthus. Cartilages of the basal group of the clasper. to the terminal part of the clasper, and is covered by the dorsal and ventral marginal cartilages (fig. 2). The basipterygium is a short, stout structure, to which are attached in a groove on its lateral margin, the last 6 fin rays of the pelvic fin. Distally, the basipterygium is elongated on its dorsal surface to _ form a protuberance which overlaps the b, cartilage. The proximal end of the b, cartilage is visible from the dorsal side, but the Beta-cartilage, situated dorsally to the b, and b, cartilages, completely obscures the b, cartilage and the distal end of b,. The Beta-cartilage is more or less flat, serving as a region of attachment for the m. flexor internus, but is slightly thickened and upraised at its proximal end, forming a shelf. The distal ends of the b, and Beta-cartilage are superimposed so that both of these elements play a part in the joint with the axial and marginal cartilages. ‘The long axial cartilage is cyclindrical at its proximal end, but it becomes dorso-ventrally flattened distally and assumes a spatulate appearance. It is tightly enclosed by the calcified dorsal and ventral marginal cartilages and is only free at its spatulate tip, although it is visible dorsally. The dorsal marginal cartilage attaches tightly to the axial, starting where the axial is connected to the b,/Beta joint, and runs along the outer lateral margin of the axial for about half its length. The dorsal marginal cartilage is somewhat broadly pointed anteriorly but it becomes expanded distally, its outer lateral edge forming the dorsal edge of the ‘scrolled’ groove of the clasper. The ventral marginal carti- lage, unlike the dorsal marginal, starts posteriorly to the axial and is a flat, tongue-like structure. Its outer lateral margin forms the ventral lip of the 502 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ‘scroll’ and medially it is attached to the axial, overlying it distally. The ventral marginal cartilage extends farther down the length of the clasper than the dorsal marginal cartilage. Attached distally to the axial and to the marginal cartilages, are the elements which comprise the terminal group of cartilages. (b) The terminal group The elements which comprise the terminal group of cartilages are asso- ciated with the structures of the glans, and may be divided into three types: ventral terminal, dorsal terminal and accessory cartilages. 1. Ventral terminal (figs. 3 A, B, G) The ventral terminal cartilage is attached to a groove in the distal end of the ventral marginal cartilage. It has a J-like shape, being by far the largest cartilage of the terminal group. It is strongly curved medially, and runs around the axial cartilage, so that it can be seen from the dorsal side. The upright portion of the ventral terminal cartilage is fairly well developed and there is a small shelf on its dorsal side, which is seen as the shield of the clasper glans. Distally, the ventral terminal is thick and somewhat pointed. 2. Dorsal terminal 1 (figs. 3 C, G) The dorsal terminal 1 cartilage (‘cover-piece’ of Jungersen) is situated on the dorsal side of the clasper, partially covering the dorsal terminal 2 cartilage, to which it is attached along the length of its longest margin. It is flatly rounded and curved proximally, so that it is elongated on its outer lateral margin. From this point, there is a shelf, running in a curve along the anterior margin, which serves as a point of insertion for the aponeurosis of the m. dilatator, which conse- quently covers the whole area of the cartilage. Distally, the cartilage is flat and its distal end is attached, together with the dorsal terminal 2 cartilage, to the axial cartilage. The dorsal terminal 1 cartilage is associated with the development of the pseudosiphon. 3. Dorsal terminal 2 (figs. 3 D, G) This curved element is inserted between the dorsal terminal 1 and the dorsal marginal/axial cartilages. It is firmly attached to the distal region of the dorsal marginal cartilage, and by means of a ligament (which forms the shelf between the slit and pseudosiphon) it is attached at its distal end to the outer lateral margin of the axial cartilage, at about 2/3 the length of that cartilage from its anterior end. The dorsal terminal 2 cartilage is strongly curved, and raised along the side of longest curvature, to form a flat surface ‘articulating’ with the dorsal terminal 1 cartilage. The dorsal terminal 2 cartilage is asso- ciated with the slit. \ 4. Accessory cartilages 1 and 2 (figs. 3 E, G) These two cartilages are strongly united and are attached to the distal end of the ventral marginal cartilage. The accessory cartilage 1 is the S-shaped RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 503 axial dorsal marginal dorsal terminal 1 dorsal terminal 2 accessory 3 SUID 0-01 accessory 1 ventral terminal accessory 2 | 2:0 cms | E Fic. 3. Raja rhizacanthus. Cartilages of the terminal group of the clasper. A, ventral terminal (ventral view); B, ventral terminal (dorsal view); C, dorsal terminal 1 (dorsal view); D, dorsal terminal 2 (dorsal view); E, accessory cartilages 1 and 2 (dorsal (view); F, accessory cartilages 3 and 4 (ventral view); G, terminal cartilages in situ from dorsal side. element, and its knife-edged protruberance is the sentinel. Accessory cartilage 2 is elongate in the longitudinal axis of the clasper, and its distal end is recurved and hook-like, forming the spike of the clasper glans. 5. Accessory cartilages 3 and 4 (fig. 3 F, G) Accessory cartilages 3 and 4 form the signal of the glans and are situated on the ventral side of the clasper, between the upright portion of the ventral terminal cartilage and the accessories 1 and 2, The smaller proximal cartilage, 504 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM accessory 4 is attached in a groove formed between the accessory cartilages 1 and 2 and the ventral marginal cartilage; accessory 3 is movable on accessory 4 and its distal end is bluntly rounded. Musculature Only a brief mention of the musculature of R. rhizacanthus needs be made for it is identical with that of R. clavata as given by Jungersen. M. dilatator Proximally this consists of a single muscle mass, but distally it seems to be split into dorsal and ventral muscles. Its origin is on the axial, b, and b, carti- lages, and it inserts as an aponeurosis on the shelf of the dorsal terminal 1 cartilage. The m. compressor sacci, m. adductor, m. flexor (not extensor as given in Junger- sen), and muscles of the fin are the same as for R. clavata. hypopyle SUD 0-f - =. ae 2. re} a pseudosiphon shield spike Fic. 4. Raja pullopunctata A, external view of right clasper from dorsal side; B, lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans. RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 505 THE CLASPER OF R. PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH The claspers from three adult specimens of R. pullopunctata, trawled West of Cape Town and in Algoa Bay were examined. (i) The external anatomy of the clasper (fig. 4. A, B) The clasper of R. pullopunctata is long and stout; its cyclindrical body is dorso-ventrally flattened distally, and slightly truncate, giving a spatulate appearance. The glans is much broader than the rest of the clasper, due to the strong development of the shield, which can be clearly seen from the dorsal side. The claspers are entirely naked, scale and spine being absent. The apopyle (fig. 4 A) opens some distance away from the vent, on the dorsal side. The rhipidion (fig. 4 B) is well developed and fan-shaped and it is attached along the inner ventral wall of the clasper, from the region of the hypopyle to about half-way along the length of the glans. Its lower surface is pitted with cavities of irregular outline, and this spongy tissue is said by Leigh-Sharpe to be erectile and to act as a splash-plate for the ejaculating spermatozoa. R. pullopunctata may be placed in the pseudogenus Gamma-raia, for there is a reduction and crowding of the structural features of the glans. As in all Gamma-raia, the signal is absent, while the shield is very well developed and extends along the whole ventral surface of the glans, from the level of the hypopyle almost to the distal extremity of the clasper. The distal region of the shield is covered by pleated epithelia, but this is so thin at the outer lateral edge, that the knife-like appearance of the shield is not unlike the sentinel of R. rhizacanthus. Both the slit and the pseudosiphon are present in the dorsal wall of the concavity of the glans. In R. pullopunctata the pseudosiphon is larger and more distally placed than the slit, and these two cavities are separated by a prominent cartilaginous shelf. The pseudosiphon is well separated from the hypopyle by the elongated dorsal marginal cartilage. Medially placed is a large, single, tongue-like structure, which examination of the terminal cartilages reveals as the spike (cf. Leigh-Sharpe). Although covered by a thick layer of epithelial tissue, the calcified cartilage can be easily felt. The small accessory 1 cartilage is not greatly developed, and the sentinel is not a recognizable element in the external appearance of the clasper. (ii) The internal anatomy of the clasper (fig. 5) The basipterygium, b, and b, cartilages and the Beta-cartilage are the same as in R. rhizacanthus. The axial cartilage is long, cyclindrical at its proximal end, but narrower and dorso-ventrally flattened distally. The distal end of the axial is more heavily calcified than the proximal region, and is slightly curved outwards, terminating in a bluntly rounded point. The dorsal marginal carti- lage starts more proximally than the ventral marginal cartilage, and runs for about 2/3 the length of the axial, to which it is tightly bonded for its entire length. The dorsal marginal cartilage is convex at its proximal end, but becomes 506 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM axial dorsal marginal ventral marginal dorsal terminal 2 ventral terminal Fic. 5. Raja pullopunctata. Cartilages of the terminal group of the clasper. A, ventral terminal (dorsal view) ; B, ventral terminal (ventral view) ; C, dorsal terminal 1 (dorsal view); D, dorsal terminal 2 (dorsal view); E, accessory 1 (ventral view); F, accessory 2 (dorsal view); G, terminal cartilages in situ from dorsal side, but with dorsal terminal 1 removed. flatter distally and is extended in a small point, forming the shelf between the pseudosiphon and the hypopyle. The ventral marginal cartilage is flat and slightly expanded distally, so that it more or less overlaps the axial cartilage, to which it is united. Its distal end is truncate. 1. Ventral terminal cartilage (figs. 5 A, B, G) As in R. rhizacanthus, the ventral terminal is J-shaped, but its distal end is not so strongly developed. The cartilage is attached to the inner surface of the ‘scroll-like’ ventral marginal cartilage. It is locked to this cartilage by means of RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 507 a protuberance, situated ventrally about 1/3 of the length of the ventral terminal from its proximal end. The protuberance engages with a corre- sponding point (the minute ‘sentinel’) of the accessory cartilage 1, hooking the two elements together. The ventral terminal cartilage does not extend to the tip of the clasper. The outer lateral edge of this cartilage is well developed and calcified, forming a convex lamina, the shield of the clasper glans. Distally, the apex of the ventral terminal is grooved, through which the distal regions of the axial and dorsal terminal 2 cartilages pass, before becoming dorso- ventrally flattened. The upright limb of the J-like ventral terminal is raised into a ridge on its dorsal surface. 2. Dorsal terminal 1 (fig. 5 C) This cartilage is situated on the dorsal surface of the clasper, and is attached along its outer edge to the dorsal terminal 2 cartilage. The dorsal terminal 1 cartilage is ‘shield-like’ in appearance and its proximal end is elongated into an obtuse point, to which the dorsal bundle of the m. dilatator attaches. The inner distal region of this cartilage is so curved that it wraps around the axial stem and can be seen on the ventral side, where it slightly overlaps the upright limb of the ventral terminal cartilage. Distally, the dorsal terminal 1 is attached by connective tissue to the axial, dorsal terminal 2 and accessory cartilages. 3. Dorsal terminal 2 (fig. 5 D) The dorsal terminal 2 cartilage is attached to the inner distal end of the dorsal marginal cartilage, so that the point and connective tissue, which forms the shelf between the pseudosiphon and hypopyle, lie behind the dorsal terminal 1. The dorsal terminal 2 cartilage is a long, thin, single cartilaginous element, curving and then re-curving, so that its pointed distal end is attached to the axial cartilage (fig. 5 G). Proximally, the dorsal terminal 2 is strongly calcified and has a short blunt protuberance on its outer lateral margin, while distally calcification is not so marked, the soft cartilage becoming dorso-ventrally flattened. About half-way along its length, on the inner edge, there is.a liga- ment (forming the shelf between the pseudosiphon and the slit), which arches and inserts on the axial cartilage about 1/5 the length of this cartilage from its distal end (fig. 5 G). 4. Accessory cartilage 1 (fig. 5 E) This minute V-shaped cartilage is attached to the distal end of the ventral marginal cartilage. The longer of its two arms runs forward along the outer lateral edge of the ventral marginal, while the shorter traverses the distal end of the ventral marginal cartilage. The base of the V is slightly pointed (the minute ‘sentinel’) and is curved inwards, forming the point on which the ventral terminal engages. It must be noted that this cartilage does not manifest itself as an external structural element in the glans. 508 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 5. Accessory cartilage 2 (fig. 5 F) The accessory cartilage 2 resembles an inverted Y. Its cyclindrical proxi- mal end is attached to the inner distal end of the ventral marginal cartilage. The longer limb of the accessory is tightly bonded to the axial, so that distally these two cartilages resemble a single element. The shorter arm of the cartilage is simple in shape and projects laterally outwards. Its terminal end is slightly upturned and forms the spike of the clasper glans. Musculature The musculature of R. pullopunctata was found to be identical with the description of the musculature of R. clavata given by Jungersen, and like R. batis, the m. dilatator is in two bundles. (a) Dorsal m. dilatator This muscle has its origin on the proximal region of the axial cartilage and its insertion on the dorsal and lateral regions of the dorsal terminal 1 cartilage. The muscle is not strictly dorsal in position but more medio-dorsal, and is much larger than the ventral m. dilatator. (b) Ventral m. dilatator The muscle is entirely separate from its dorsal counterpart and has its origin on the ventral proximal region of the axial cartilage and the distal end of the b, cartilage. It inserts as connective tissue across the surface of the ventral terminal cartilage, although some fibres attach to the tip of the axial cartilage. The m. compressor sacct, m. adductor, m. flexer and the muscles of the fin are the same as for R. clavata. DIscussION Two pairs of claspers from specimens of R. batis Linnaeus, caught S.W. of Ireland, and a pair of claspers from R. clavata Linnaeus, caught at Lowestoft, were examined for purposes of comparison. Although there is a marked difference in the size of the clawiee of R. pullopunctata and R. batis, the general external appearance of the claspers is similar. In both, the clasper is long, stout and naked, becoming dorso-ventrally flattened and spatulate at its terminal end. The outer lateral edge of the shield can be seen from the dorsal side in both species, but in R. bats it is more promi- nent. This may be due to differences in the size of the claspers. However, examination of the clasper glans reveals that the structural features in R. pullopunctata and R. batis are different (figs. 4 B, 6). The pseudosiphon and slit are present on the inner dorsal surface of the glans in both species, but their formation is somewhat different, although they are associated with the degree of development of the dorsal terminal cartilages in both cases. In R. pullopunctata there is a marked shelf-like ridge separating RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 509 shield slit ~hypopyle rhipidion sentinel pseudosiphon spike Fic. 6. Raja batis. Lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans. the pseudosiphon from the slit; this shelf is found to be wanting in R. batis. The pseudosiphon is similarly situated in the two species, but in R. pullopunctata the pseudosiphon resembles a concavity rather than the simple pouch found in R. batis. The slit is more proximally situated in R. pullopunctata, occurring about half-way along the length of the glans (about one-third the length in R. batis). The hypopyle seems to be more distally placed in R. batis, but this may be due to the heavier development of the shield. The rhipidion is pitted and fan- shaped in both species, occurring along the inner ventral wall of the hypopyle, and extending about half-way along the length of the glans in R. pullopunctata and about two-thirds the length in R. batis. The rhipidion is more compact in R. batis. The prominent shield extends along the whole inner ventral surface of the glans in both species, but it is thinner and covered with pleated epithelia 510 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM along its entire length in &. batis, while in R. pullopunctata the broader shield is only pleated at its distal region. The most noticeable difference in the structure of the claspers is in the presence of the enlarged sentinel in R. batis, which extends distally and fits together with the spike. In R. pullopunctata, the sentinel is reduced and lies under the rhipidion, so that it is not seen when the glans is opened, and these two elements are not expanded terminally as they are in R. batis. As has been pointed out, the visible external characters of the clasper are dorsal terminal 2 axial dorsal terminal 3 wane heise: Fic. 7. Raja batis. Cartilages of the terminal group. A, dorsal terminal 1 (dorsal view); B, ventral terminal (dorsal view) ; C, accessory 1 (dorsal view); D, accessory 2 (dorsal view); E, dorsal terminal 2 and 3 in position. RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH By. ee closely associated with the structure and number of the internal cartilages, and therefore differences in the structure of the glans will be shown by differ- ences in the terminal cartilages. In R. pullopunctata there are a total of five cartilages in the terminal group (2 dorsal terminals, 1 ventral terminal and 2 accessory terminals), while in R. batis six terminal cartilages are present (3 dorsal terminals, 1 ventral terminal and 2 accessory terminals) (figs. 5, 7). Although there is a great difference in the size of these elements, their differences in shape and their position may be examined. The dorsal terminal 1 cartilage is similarly situated in both R. batis and R. pullopunctata, occurring on the dorsal side of the clasper, and it is flat and plate-like, being slightly convex distally. In both species, the median edge is bent in such a manner, that the cartilage wraps round the axial stem and may be seen on the ventral side. Distally, the cartilage is pointed in the two species, but in R. pullopunctata, the proximal edge is elongated into a point for the attachment of the aponeurosis of the m. dilatator, while in R. batis (fig. 7), the proximal edge is almost straight and somewhat more convex. The dorsal terminal 2 cartilage is attached to the distal end of the dorsal marginal cartilage in both species, and it is interesting to note that in R. pullopunctata, the dorsal terminal 2 extends to the tip of the axial cartilage, while in R. batis, the crescent-shaped dorsal terminal 2 (fig. 7 D, E) is attached to about half way along the axial and that the dorsal terminal 3 extends to the tip of the clasper, i.e. these two cartilages in R. batis have been reduced to a single cartilage in R. pullopunctata, although there is linking between the dorsal terminal 2 and the axial in both cases. The terminal end of the axial cartilage is similarly curved (laterally outwards) in the two species, and the attachment of the dorsal terminal 2 of R. pullopunctata and the dorsal terminal 3 of R. batis (fig. 7 E) is similar. Although both R. pullopunctata and R. batis possess two accessory cartilages, the accessory cartilage 1 (forming the sentinel) is reduced to a small point in R. pullopunctata. In R. batis this cartilage (fig. 7 C) is well developed and extends down towards the spike, and fits closely to it. The ventral terminal cartilages are similarly situated in both R. batis and R. pullopunctata and these elements are similar in shape. Both possess the ‘hooking’ protuberance on the inner ventral margin, the enlarged convex outer lateral edge and the raised dorsal ridge. However in R. batis (fig. 7 B) the distal end of the convex edge projects slightly from the main body of the limb, and the distal end of the ventral terminal is not so markedly grooved as in R. pullopunctata. It may therefore be concluded that, in the structure of the glans and in the number and arrangement of the internal cartilaginous elements, the claspers of R. pullopunctata and R. batis are different. Besides differences noted in the structure of the claspers of the two species, some differences can also be seen in the external characters. Smith (1964) points out that there is a difference in shape between the two, but examination of later and adult stages of R. pullopunctata reveals that the shape of the disc varies and that the pectorals and anterior margins of the disc become more 512 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM concave, as they do in R. batis. The author is unable to detect any appreciable difference in shape. Examination of specimens of comparable size indicates that the inter- orbital is narrower in &. pullopunctata than in R. batis, and that there is little difference in the comparative size of the eye. The most noticeable difference is the presence of the large, single, median, nuchal spine in R. pullopunctata, which is found both in juveniles and adults (although sometimes worn down). Except about the eyes, the upper surface of the disc is entirely devoid of other large spines, as it is in R. batis. Therefore Smith’s proposal that R. pullopunctata and R. batis are distinct species as based on the general external morphology, is confirmed on the basis of the clasper structure. Recently, two large ‘black-bellied’ skates, lacking signs of a median nuchal spine, were obtained in trawls off Cape Columbine in 250 fathoms. ‘The external characters of the clasper of the mature male were seen to be identical with those of R. batis from European waters. Therefore R. batis Linnaeus also may occur off South Africa; however, further investi- gation on these specimens is necessary. It is interesting to note that a ‘black-bellied’ skate from the Falkland Islands, R. flavirostris Philippi 1892, greatly resembles the South African R. pullopunctata in possessing a single, large, median, nuchal spine. But as yet, clasper material is unavailable for the purposes of comparison. The author was unable to find a single difference, both in the external structure of the glans and in the number and arrangement of the internal cartilaginous elements, between the claspers of R. clavata and R. rhizacanthus. The claspers in these two species are identical. Although Norman points out that the South African species is closely related to the European species, he considers that the two are distinct on the basis of the degree of spination in adults, the position of the vent and the shape of the snout. Preliminary examination of some two hundred specimens of R. rhizacanthus has shown that the shape of the snout varies considerably in local populations, as does the degree of spination, and the position of the vent. Therefore bearing this in mind, and in view of the fact that the claspers are identical, the author agrees with Barnard and Fowler that R. rhizacanthus specimens should be referred to R. clavata and that R. rhizacanthus therefore becomes a synonym of R. clavata. This is further supported by the fact that masked bipolarity is already acknowledged in R. alba, so that it is not unlikely that distribution of this type also occurs in R. clavata. It may be seen from fig. 8 that the distribution of R. clavata ranges from Arctic waters to the tropical waters of the Indian Ocean, having been recorded from greater extremes than R. alba. However, through most of their recorded range both species occur in the same waters. As yet, these two species have never been recorded from the equatorial waters of West Africa, but equatorial submergence probably occurs, allowing gene flow from northern hemisphere to southern hemisphere and vice versa. RAJA RHIZACANTHUS REGAN AND RAJA PULLOPUNCTATA SMITH 513 AX, 4 4 ar a ooo A A- @ A:.- @ * wt , A C @r oe . alba te AR. clavata er Fic. 8. Map showing the masked bipolar distribution of R. alba and R. clavata. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Messrs. M. J. Holden and C. H. Humphries of the Fisheries Laboratory at Lowestoft for the R. clavata and R. batis material and to Mr. S. X. Kannemeyer for assistance in collection of the South African skates. My thanks are due to Dr. N. F. Paterson for checking the manuscript and for many helpful recommendations. The Trustees of the South African Museum acknowledge gratefully the receipt of a grant from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research towards the cost of publication. 514: ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SUMMARY After detailed studies of the anatomy of the claspers of the males, it is considered that Raja rhizacanthus Regan is synonymous with R. clavata Linnaeus and that R. pullopunctata Smith is distinct from R. batis Linnaeus, but that R. batts Linnaeus may also occur in South African waters. REFERENCES BARNARD, K. H. 1925. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21: 1-418. BicELow, H. B. & ScHROEDER, W. C. 1953. Fishes of the western North Atlantic. Pt. II. Saw- fishes, guitarfishes, .. . Mem. Sears Fdn mar. Res. 1 (2): 1-588. EKMAN, S. 1953. Sa ' i . he a ae « , he ed BE ee OL mt 7 ty ve Yel e 5 a Pea, PL Mere ere only CORR Tae hae SN Ne a "; Seely Borat 4 Puree gy } ; | rf ae 2 abe hye y iE oo a 1k SAS. al 9 Co thse MER a! ; yl as iy SYP Alena A, Hea Cea a ie haha A 4 if } 1 ie we ‘ “ Baan if Fe) r ay Phe Ee a a bea tiva eit ont \ k iad ‘ ‘ hed Y % y ; * 1 t i 4, he ia ty i my MUS. COMP. Zool, LIBRARY HARDING & SMITH MAY 26 1967 ARD SOME SOUTH AFRIGANA®: FRESH WATER COPEPODA April 1967 April Volume 48 Band Part 21 #£2Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, PLO 3> 3» 7-8), 2(1—2, 5> t-=p-1.)5 5(2, 5» 7-9); 6(1, t.—p.1.), 70, oN 8, g(1-2), 10(1-3), 112), 7> trope) 5 21, 24(2), gr (13) 38, 44(4). Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel 25 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap SOME SOUTH AFRICAN FRESH WATER COPEPODA MUS. COMP. ZOOL. By : LIBRARY J. P. Harpine anp W. A. SMITH MAY 28 1967 British Museum (Natural History), London HARVARD UNIVERSITY (With 9g figures in the text) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction hr aed GREG Systematic account... Pac: ts pomuaary 6. 8 See . 520 Acknowledgement gj LOE PY ined pea Relerences, |. : ; : . 521 INTRODUCTION The material consisted of 26 tubes from the western Cape Province, 45 tubes from the Jukskei—Crocodile system, 39 tubes from the Vaal River, and 32 tubes from other parts of the Transvaal. The material was collected by Dr. A. D. Harrison and his colleagues. The collection comprised 9 species of Diaptomidae and 11 species of Cyclopoida. Unidentified Harpacticoida were also present in some of the samples. The following species were identified: CYCLOPOIDA . Macrocyclops albidus (Jurine) sub.-sp. oligolasius Kiefer . Eucyclops serrulatus (Fischer) . Eucyclops gibson (Brady) . Tropocyclops prasinus Fischer . Paracyclops fimbriatus (Fischer) . Paracyclops finitimus Kiefer . Acanthocyclops vernalis (Fischer) . Microcyclops varicans (Sars) . Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) . Thermocyclops oblongatus (Sars) . Thermocyclops emini (Mrazek) —_ a OO O~I OMDUoUHP ww ND —_ a 3 3 . 9. Afr. Mus. 48 (21), 1967: 515-521, 9 figs. O05) 516 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM DIAPTOMIDAE 12. Lovenula barnardi Sars 13. Lovenula falcifera (Lovén) 14. Paradiaptomus lamellatus Sars 15. Metadiaptomus transvaalensis Methuen 16. Metadiaptomus capensis (Sars) 17. Metadiaptomus colonialis (Douwe) 18. Metadiaptomus purcelli (Sars) 19. Tropodiaptomus spectabilis (Kiefer) 20. Eudiaptomus sp. The names used for the Cyclopoida are in accordance with Kiefer’s monograph (Kiefer, 1929a). This gives a full synonymy and here we give synonyms only with reference to other works on South African copepods. Macrocyclops albidus (Jurine) sub.-sp. oligolasius Kiefer The species M. albidus is a cosmopolitan one but specimens in Africa south of the Sahara if examined sufficiently closely are usually found to belong to the subspecies oligolasius which was first described (Kiefer, 1928a) from the Linjanti River where it flows into the Zambezi. Hutchinson et al. (1932) record it from the south-eastern Transvaal. Sars (1927) did not find any representatives of the genus Macrocyclops in his survey of the Entomostraca of the Cape Province but two of the present samples from the western Cape Province contained M. albidus oligolasius, both from a vlei at Betty’s Bay in brown and acid water. It was also present in the Vaal River, the Olifants Vléi near Johannesburg, the Klein Jukskei1 River and from the Great Usutu River in the eastern Transvaal. ® Eucyclops serrulatus (S. Fischer) This cosmopolitan species was found in all regions sampled in the present survey. It is rather surprising that so common a species was not found in the Cape Province by Sars (1927). Several of the present samples contained it. Hutchinson et al. (1932) record it from south-eastern Transvaal and it was present in many of the present samples from the Transvaal. Eucyclops gibson (Brady) Cyclops gibsoni Brady 1904: 123, pl. 6, figs. 1-10. Cyclops longistylis Brady 1910: 242. (Nigeria.) Afrocyclops gibsoni (Brady), Sars 1927: 121, pl. 13, figs. 1-18. Eucyclops gibsoni (Brady), Hutchinson et al. 1932. This is a species widely distributed in Africa south of the Sahara. Found in the western Cape Province in the Krom River, Stellenbosch, and under the Blouberg road bridge, Milnerton, and in the Transvaal at the Amato Dam, Benoni, and at the Pretoria sewage works. Brady’s type of longistylis from Nigeria is in the BM(NH) on a slide and appears to be this species as Sars suggested. SOME SOUTH AFRICAN FRESH WATER COPEPODA 517 Tropocyclops prasinus Fischer Leptocyclops prasinus (Fischer) Sars 1927: 119, pl. 12, figs. 11-20. Eucyclops prasinus (Fischer) Hutchinson e¢ al. 1932. This is a very widely distributed probably cosmopolitan species, but was represented in the present collections only by a single male from the Crocodile— Jukskei system. It is a very small species and may have passed through the nets. It is recorded from the Cape (Sars, 1927) and the Transvaal (Hutchinson @ Gl..5. 132). | Paracyclops fimbriatus (Fischer) This species is reported from the whole of the Palaearctic and Nearctic regions and most parts of Africa. It was found in four of the samples from the Vaal River, two of which contained the related form Paracyclops finitimus as well. Paracyclops finitimus Kiefer Platycyclops poppei (non Rehberg) Sars 1927: 127, pl. 14, figs. 5-17. This species was first described from Morocco (Kiefer, 1928b: 99) and has been found in New Zealand. Sars had already recorded it under the synonym given above from the Cape Peninsula. It was found in three samples from the Cape Province: the Krom River at Stellenbosch and the Berg River and in nineteen from the Transvaal: at Benoni, in the Crocodile—Jukskei System, in the Klipspruit near Johannesburg, in the oxidation pond of the Pretoria sewage works and in the Vaal. Acanthocyclops vernalis (Fischer) This species is widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere and has been recorded from South America and Kerguelen. In the present collection it is represented by a single adult female from the Berg River. Microcyclops varicans (Sars) Owing to uncertainties of identification the precise distribution of this species is not known; but there are records from all principal land masses. I know of no record for South Africa south of the Vaal River; but Hutchinson et al. (1932) record it from the Transvaal. It was present in three tubes from the Crocodile—Jukskei System in marginal vegetation and from two stations on the Vaal River. Mesocyclops leuckartt (Claus) This cosmopolitan species was found in twenty-four of the samples: from the western Cape Province, from the Vaal River and from the Transvaal. Thermocyclops oblongatus (Sars) (Figs. 1-9) Mesocyclops oblongatus Sars 1927: 114, pl. 11, figs. I-15. (Thermocyclops) infrequens Kiefer 1929b: 315, fig. 10. Sars (1927) described T. oblongatus from the Cape Province. Unfortunately his figures are not very accurate, in particular showing a peculiarly shaped 518 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM receptaculum and a fifth leg with the outer terminal seta less than half the length of the inner. Kiefer (1929b) described T. infrequens and many specimens of the present collection from both the Transvaal and the Cape agree with Kiefer’s description and figures, but none with Sars. We have examined Sars’s original material and find that the receptaculum and fifth leg are the same as in Kiefer’s species and as these were the only features by which the two species were thought to be distinguishable we conclude that oblongatus and infrequens are two names for a single species. There are two tubes of Sars’s material, one which had at some time been allowed to dry up was from a small pond at Salt River, collected by Dr. Purcell and referred to in Sars’s paper, and the other of speci- mens in good condition from an unspecified locality. Both tubes appeared to contain the same species and figs. 1-4 are from a specimen from the second tube. Figs. 5-9 are of corresponding parts of specimens from the Transvaal in the present collection. The species is very close to T. schuurmanae Kiefer, the main difference being that the rounded prominence on the lamella of leg 4 (figs. 2 and 6) are larger, closer together and bear more spinules. Kiefer’s original specimens of 7. schuurmanae were from the Transvaal (Kiefer, 1928a: 15) and Hutchinson ef al. (1932) also record it from several Transvaal localities and from a Cape Vlei. However, apart from a few T. emini, all the Thermocyclops in the present collection are 7. oblongatus, not T. schuurmanae. The localities are: the Zeekoe Vlei on the Cape Flats, various dams at Benoni, Transvaal, five stations in the Crocodile—Jukskei System and the Apies River, Pretoria. Thermocyclops emini (Mrazek) Originally found in East Africa (Mrazek, 1896: 4; Sars, 1909: 50) it has since been found in the Sudan and in Egypt (Gurney, 1911: 32) and in the Transvaal and Portuguese East Africa (Hutchinson et al., 1932). The present samples were both from the Vaal Barrage. Lovenula barnardi Sars Originally described from Ovamboland, South West Africa (Sars, 1927: 92) this species was present in a number of the samples collected along the Vaal River. | Lovenula falcifera (Lovén) First described from Natal and later found near Cape Town (Sars, 1927: 86) and in a number of places in the Transvaal (Hutchinson e¢-al., 1932). This species was found only in the Cape Province in the present collections: in temporary waters on the Cape Flats, Berg River localities and the Riet Vlei, Milnerton. Paradiaptomus lamellatus Sars The type locality is Knysna, Cape Province (Sars, 1895: 46) and this species is recorded by Sars (1927: 94) also from near Cape Town. Brady (1907: 183) records it from Natal and Rithe (1914: 27) from the Cape. The species was found in three of the present samples, all from the Cape. ee ee o89 SOME SOUTH AFRICAN FRESH WATER COPEPODA ‘sSa] WIJ pue sturwes umnpnovydaser SuIMoyYs JUsUISaS jeques jo jUSUISaS 1DvI0Y} ysey “Qg “Y ‘s81q ‘Sa_ yIINo; Jo podopus jo yuouiSes jeurus} “6 ‘E ‘s81q ‘ssa_ YIINOF jo eppeurey Ssunrun ‘g *% ‘SSI “TWIeI [BOINy ‘ZG ‘1 ‘s81q ‘jewoyeur jevasuesy, “6—-G ‘s8rq ‘odeD oy} wor [elo}eur adk J, ‘P—-1 ss1gq *(sreg) snyvsu0jgo sqojsdzouuay 7, “6-1 “sty 520 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Metadiaptomus transvaalensis Methuen Metadiaptomus transvaalensis Methuen 1910: 160, pl. 16, figs. 46a—c, pls. 17-18. Diaptomus meridianus Douwe 1912: 24. Paradiaptomus transvaalensis (Methuen) Hutchinson et al. 1932. Diaptomus rigidus Sars 1927: 101, pl. 8, figs. 13-18. This is the type species of the genus and was first described (Methuen, 1910) from Lake Chrissie and other parts in the eastern Transvaal. Hutchinson et al. (1932) also record it from this area and other parts of the Transvaal. Van Douwe’s 1912 specimens from Great Nama Land are probably the same species and the present samples were mostly from the Vaal River, and also from one station in the western Cape Province at Piquetberg on the Berg River. Only two battered females were present in the last sample. Metadiaptomus capensis (Sars) Diaptomus capensis Sars 1907, Riihe 1914: 26, fig. 8a, b. Sars 1927: 98, pl. 8, figs. 1-12. Paradiaptomus capensis (Sars) Hutchinson e¢ al. 1932. This species as far as I know has only been recorded from the Cape Province, it was present in three of the samples, the Zeekoe Vlei and a tem- porary pool on the Cape Flats and Sirkel’s Vlei near Cape Point. Metadiaptomus colonialis (Douwe) Diaptomus colonialis Douwe, 1914. Paradiaptomus colonialis (Douwe) Hutchinson et al. 1932. The specimens described by Van Douwe were from South West Africa and those collected by Hutchinson et al., from various parts of the Transvaal. Eight of the present samples were from inside the Transvaal and three from its southern border. Metadiaptomus purcellr (Sars) Diaptomus purcelli Sars 1907: 12, pl. 2, figs. 3-10. Sars 1927: 103, pl. 9, figs. 1-8. Paradiaptomus purcelli (Sars) Hutchinson ¢é al. 1932. All records of this species seem to be from the south-western bape Province and it is characteristic of temporary pools on the Cape Flats. Tropodiaptomus spectabilis (Kiefer) Diaptomus spectabilis Kiefer 1929b: 311, figs. 5, 6. Hutchinson e¢ al. 1932. Tropodiaptomus spectabilis (Kiefer) Relies 1932. This is a Transvaal species and was collected from two Trae localities. Eudiaptomus sp. Three females and one male of an undetermined species of Eudiaptomus were present in a sample from the Hartebeespoort Dam. SUMMARY Eleven species of Cyclopoida and eight species of Diaptomidae are recorded from inland waters of the Cape Province and Transvaal. Figures of Thermo- cyclops oblongatus (Sars) are given and it is shown that TJ. znfrequens Kiefer is a synonym of this species. i A SOME SOUTH AFRICAN FRESH WATER COPEPODA 521 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are indebted to Dr. A. D. Harrison and the National Institute for Water Research of the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the opportunity of examining this material. We are grateful to Dr. J. R. Grindley for letting us examine specimens described by G. O. Sars in the collections of the South African Museum. The Trustees of the South African Museum acknowledge gratefully the receipt of a grant from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research towards the cost of publication. REFERENCES Brapy, G. S. 1904. On Entomostraca collected in Natal by Mr. James Gibson. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1904 (2): 121-128. Brapy, G. S. 1907. On Entomostraca collected in Natal by Mr. James Gibson. (Part IT.) _ Ann. Natal Mus. 1: 173-186. Brapy, G. S. 1910. On some species of Cyclops and other Entomostraca collected by Dr. J. M. Dalziel in northern Nigeria. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 4: 239-250. DouweE, C. VAN. 1912. Neue Stisswasser-Copepoden aus Siidafrika. Jn Schultze, L. Zoologische und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Stidafrika 1903-1905. 5: 21-32. Jena: Fischer. (Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 17: 21-32.) Douwe, C. VAN. 1914. Copepoda. Jn Michaelsen, W., ed. Beitrdége zur Kenntnis der Land und Stisswasserfauna Deutsch-Stidwestafrikas. 1: 93-103. Hamburg: Friederichsen. Gurney, R. 1911. On some freshwater Entomostraca from Egypt and the Soudan. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (8) 7: 25-33. Hutcuinson, G. E., Pickrorp, G. E. & Scuuurman, J. F. M. 1932. A contribution to the hydrobiology of pans and other inland waters of South Africa. Arch. Hydrobiol. 24: 1-154. Kierer, F. 1928a. Beitrage zur Copepodenkunde. (VIII.) Zool. Anz. 76: 5-18. Krerer, F. 1928b. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der freilebenden Copepoden Marokkos. Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. Maroc 8; 87-106. Krerer, F. 1929a. Crustacea Copepoda. II. Cyclopoida Gnathostoma. Tierreich 53: i-xvi, 1-102. KieFrer, F. 1929b. Neue und wenig bekannte Siisswasser-Copepoden aus Siidafrika. Zool. Anz. 80: 309-316. KreFer, F. 1932. Versuch eines Systems der Diaptomiden (Copepoda Calanoida). Zool. 7b. (Syst.) 63: 451-520. MeruHueEn, P. A. 1910. On a collection of freshwater Crustacea from the Transvaal. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1910: 148-166. MrAzexk, A. 1896. Die Copepoden Ost-Afrikas. In Deutsch-Ost-Afrika 4 fig. 1 (Mobius, K., ed. Die Thierwelt-Ost-Afrikas . . . Wirbellose Thiere) (11): 1-11. Berlin: Reimer. Rtue, F. E. 1914. Die Siisswassercrustaceen der Deutschen Siidpolar Expedition 1901-1903 mit Ausschluss der Ostracoden. Dtsch. StidpolExped. 16 (Zool. 8): 4-66. Sars, G. O. 1895. On some South African Entomostraca raised from dried mud. Skr. Vidensk- Selsk., Christ. 8: 1-56. Sars, G. O. 1907. On two new species of the genus Diaptomus from South Africa. Arch. Math. Naturv. 28 (8): 1-17. Saps,G. O. 1909. Zoological results of the third Tanganyika expedition, conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, F.Z.S., 1904-1905. Report on the Copepoda. Pros. zool. Soc. Lond. 1909: 31-77. Sars, G. O. 1927. The freshwater Entomostraca of the Cape Province (Union of South Africa). Part III. Copepoda. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 25: 85-149. i f V? rai # Ew, i we + A N 4) Fj : A a) P i td ae | adi -, fr , : \ ik z : " et } : , 4," *] i y Peis t mira et RAR ia ci i ua % ” Ky wa ‘ t <¢ ah AW wh Vive NS ky t ’ 2 ‘ wv 5 \ 2 re hs , 4 - Cay ay) lf We my ed Ais wy as mee mes ‘ag oat tS ; if ois , aX, Wie Sa wel ve : ‘Ce Tpit hak an ® tA ) stay ny INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLeE oF CONTENTS and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. = 7 in. (7# in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Situ, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945. When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmiTH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. and ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 ( = natalensis West). 5 bs ’ , ~~ 4 ie ; » 3 P ; be ; ; rem . - " . + " 7 \ y y 1 pa wT 7 ta e 1 or , , ot j aa | Pp 4 i N 1 ‘re ¥ ul if j P \" i i ae fe se i aan Ey TS r ur ; ‘ . ‘ 4 salt ‘a Al 0 zy Pe 4 } os eee ee J ' “4 fa 74.5 Ges , : if f i Cee “ar ne) T 6 Pe i LA pane Sip ut Fem hy bret if ond bl , : Pe ee eee tne Ys ; mi be P ; ‘ | Tee ; : BAT ViPS Ri. | eee Sb an Leta a s'¥ ae - y h Z . t , ¢ 4 ¥ i} v ¢ i ~ . a i ee e's’ pay t ms wt ' Mae “ig ; ; wrt Tike FY * * = aC veer. { “ t j wi? ¥ atiane SF pu h ; cpt Vor dhe } nbn 7 I " ; iv - 7 ' ry Ps * j . ~~ ’ 4 - + : i ( i) x - ¥ ae I oe n £ P a , rh 5 Re. ay 4 ¢ , ’ w f ‘ be 4 ees aes D Oo an a 4 i A 4 Ned *) ’ ; , . ' 7 * \ , a ' if ¥ : i * ) « 4 ¥ a M4 x “a ‘ z {se iy : ‘ ‘ mh 0 s Q ? “ } * Sir , +e vided ia + NT i AY at 9 capil “i ‘ Vee Att Rage fee tae A Ts ee Fis. : Fi i Pi be } ss 2A BE ab . z ‘ m) oa hua a i al 3 5 te s Gag ot ‘ » { wa ‘ ee s ¥ - YS 4 i . F oe ‘ei ts ‘ ae ‘ + a * . = é i : PS 5 4 4 * F .* = : Pg ‘ ‘ies SE tagrihie eaeay Yew ss Oe: PRA OTE ; Se ge ae gies pasta eet a ‘ ean nie ‘ va pou 4 ER Re ER ee iar ‘ Gt cae tah - Pre 5 hte ah 20 | eae : y j { x eae: a a Bi: ; 5 Pome ets pe sere Cea : oi Tah: a ry ce ie es 8 # * , y aie P ‘ 4 gio. fice ae 7% a) i ebay ek ae 6 OG Ma ae Se Ca ID oe TY be aha ; y * 5 i ‘Eade eae a 4 2 ientent Srna Yay 4 mT a.” E 4 ’ a v : S 3 ns Se age a - A ‘ . nb is gn tag (es bat oe ' hy M's ~ ' ¥ J sees A » leo . i Flo * ‘ £ ee ae ae Na ie : . ) Fr y, 4 a ‘ . . * AR i 20h {78 (ay is ‘ eb ae All ee ee ew b+ Sa 4 LSB . Fue ‘ ’ Q f 1 r pice 3 1G Uo VEG TA Pa ea POs NES Nc RA a ee Ate mi ae og mad Pent ; at iss Lie delat Ey ly Ha Mabe TT ‘ PAT ee NALD RD OE Ea, ER RY De te balks ‘ i ' i P 4 q ‘tree ie ova eae ¢ mh f mS AP I BNR aNe le Fr aie eat they alee) aaa i “ . | New / ‘ i s } ‘ Ay vy f F ia puny ; a, ) 4 i i j : iy i vy P ian { pe - ‘ Sl se. MUS. COMP. ZooL. LIBRARY MAY 26 1967 HARVARD THE FISHES OF TRISTAN DA QCUNEAN, GOUGH ISLAND AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT M. J. PENRITH March 1967 Maart Volume 48 Band Part 22 &Deel ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM Cape Town Kaapstad The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town (Cash with order, post free) Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid van stof Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad (Kontant met bestelling, posvry) OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK I, (1, 3> o> 7-3), 3(1-2, 5» f-p.1.), 5(2, 5» 7-9), 6(1, tinpi)5 70, 3)> 8, g(1-2), 10(I-3), (Oi 7> tpl.) 21, 24(2), 31(1-3), 38, 44(4)- Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel 60c Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers Edms., Bpk., Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap THE FISHES OF TRISTAN DA CUNHA, GOUGH ISLAND AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT MUS. COMP. ZOOL. By LIBRARY M. J. PENRITH* a : MAY 26 1967 South African Museum, Cape Town HARVARD (With 2 text-figures and 1 plate) UNIVERSITY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction : , ‘ ». 52g Material : : : : » 525 Systematic account . : ») {926 Zoogeography . ; : an, ALE Summary . , : ‘ = SAS Acknowledgement : : . 546 peieremees, 6.10.13) sy A. eb INTRODUCTION In the south-east Atlantic Ocean there are three known areas of very shallow water (not counting the African coast). Two of these are around the shores of islands, the Tristan da Cunha group and Gough Island, while the third is the Vema Seamount. Tristan da Cunha The island of Tristan da Cunha, together with the two smaller islands of Inaccessible and Nightingale, lies almost midway between South Africa and South America (37° 05’ S., 17° 40’ W.). It is permanently inhabited and has been the subject of several scientific expeditions and reports. Capt. Dugal Carmichael, F.L.S. (army surgeon to the garrison in the island, 1816-17) was the first to publish a report on the flora and fauna of Tristan. In this paper (1818) he described four species of fishes from the island and listed five others as being common to both Tristan and the Cape. Car- michael’s work was referred to by Regan (1913a) but no further fishes were added to the nine already known from the island until Barnard (1923, 1925) listed two more species which he considered to be conspecific with South African species. Norman (1935a) described a further species believed by him to be endemic to the island group. After the Norwegian expedition of 1937-8, Sivertsen (1945) could add a further seven species to the fish fauna of the island, two of them being new species and believed by him to be endemic to Tristan da Cunha. Finally, Rowan & Rowan (1955) added three more records of oceanic fishes from the island. * Seconded from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Oceanographic Unit, University of Cape Town. 523 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48 (22), 1967: 523-548, 2 figs., 1 pl. 524 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM At present the known fish fauna of Tristan consists of 19 species which Sivertsen (1945) divided into an oceanic component and a coastal component. (In the list below, the first reference to the species occurring at Tristan is given in parenthesis after the author of the species.) The islanders’ common name for the species is also given where known. (a) Oceanic species Prionace glauca (Linn.) (Sivertsen, 1945) . . . . Blue shark Maurolicus muellert (Gmelin) (Barnard, 1925) . . — Myctophum humboldti (Risso) (Sivertsen, 1945) . . Scomberesox saurus (Walbaum) (Sivertsen, 1945) . . — Exocoetus exiliens Bloch (Carmichael, 1818) . . . — Alepisaurus ferox Lowe (Rowan & Rowan, 1955) — Notopogon lillie: Regan (Sivertsen, 1945) . . . . — Seriola lalandi Valenc. (Rowan & Rowan, 1955) . Yellowtail Polyprion americanus (Bloch) (Rowan & Rowan, 1955) Steambrass Thyrsites atun (Euphrasen) (Carmichael, 1818) . . Snoek (b) Coastal species Artosoma australis (Barnard) (Barnard, 1923). . . _ 1Gaidropsarus insularum Sivertsen (Sivertsen, 1945). .. = Acantholatris monodactylus (Carmichael) (Carmichael, 1818) i. Ne Gudek elan 60 2alehtt en Bovichthys diacanthus (Carmichael) (Carmichael, 1818) Klipfish *Decapterus longimanus Norman (Norman, 1935a) . . Mackerel Labrichthys ornatus (Carmichael) (Carmichael, 1818) Concha or Conger 3Helicolenus tristanensis Sivertsen (Sivertsen, 1945) . Soldier Sebastichthys capensis (Gmelin) (Carmichael, 1818) . Soldier Sertolella antarctica (Carmichael) (Carmichael, 1818) Bluefish Seriolella christophersent Sivertsen (Sivertsen, 1945) . Stumpnose The identity of the fish recorded by Carmichael as the ‘Roman fish’ Sparus , 1s not known. The South African ‘Roman’ is a Sparid (Chryso- blephus laticeps) but has not been recorded from Tristan. Gough Island Gough Island lies slightly farther south than Tristan (40° 20’ S., 9° 55’ W.), and is not permanently inhabited, although the South African Government has maintained a weather station on the island for several years. Although several expeditions have called at the island, it has not been subject to the same degree of collecting as has Tristan. Only one expedition, the Gough Island Scientific Survey 1955-6, has spent much time on the island, but they have not published any data on the fishes obtained. 1 As G. capensis (Kaup) by Barnard (1925). * Probably the fish recorded by Carmichael as Scomber trachurus. ® Recorded by Carmichael as Sebastichthys maculata. Fy ae THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 525 Accounts of fish collected by the Scotza, which called on the way back from the Antarctic (Regan, 1913)) and by the R.V. William Scoresby (Norman, 19350), have been published. The fishes recorded are: 1Helicolenus tristanensis Sivertsen (Regan, 19350) Sebastichthys capensis (Gmelin) (Regan, 1913)) Bovichthys diacanthus (Carmichael) (Regan, 19136) Caesioperca coatst Regan (Regan, 1913)) Acantholatris monodactylus (Carmichael) (Norman, 19350) Holdgate (1958), in a popular account of the Gough Island Scientific Survey, listed the following species of fish under their Tristan common names: five- fingers, soldiers, klipfish, congers. Vema Seamount This exceptionally shallow seamount was discovered in 1957 by the R.V. Vema, and traverses were made then as well as in 1959 by the Vema and in 1963 by the R.V. Robert D. Conrad. In November 1964 a detailed survey of the peak was undertaken by the South African National Committee for Oceanographic Research, using the diamond prospecting tug, Emerson K (Simpson & Heydorn, 1965). ‘The peak was found to have a position 31° 38’ S., 8° 20’ E. and a least depth of only 14 fathoms, with a well-defined plateau about five square miles in extent and of approximately 35 fathoms depth. Subsequent to the visit by the Emerson K there have been many visits by com- mercial fishing vessels from Cape Town as well as a short visit by the R.V. Africana II in April 1965. MATERIAL The material used for the present paper was obtained from several sources. The South African Museum has been slowly building up a collection of Tristan fish for many years, mainly obtained as donations from Mr. Keytel (1907), the rock-lobster survey of 1949, and small but valuable donations from Tristan and Gough Islands by the Division of Sea Fisheries and Capt. M. T. Scott, master of the rock-lobster fishing vessel, Tristanza. Specimens of fishes from the Vema Seamount were obtained from the Division of Sea Fisheries (those from the Emerson K collection, and commercial fishing vessels, and a collection made from R.V. Africana IT by Mr. A. C. Paterson), as well as directly from the fishing companies. These collections have resulted in several further species being added to the fish fauna of Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island as well as adding to our knowledge of the species already recorded from the islands, and in addition have enabled their fauna to be compared with that from the Vema Seamount. 1 Recorded as Sebastes maculatus C. & V. 526 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT Exocoetidae Cypsilurus lineatus (Cuvier & Valenciennes) Cypsilurus lineatus (Cuvier & Valenciennes) Bruun, 1935: 47. Only one specimen, of 382 mm standard length, was examined. The fish was found in a drum of unsorted material from Tristan in the Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University. The body proportions as thousandths of standard length are as follows: pectoral fin 675, pelvic fin 309, dorsal height 111, depth 157, head 199, pre- dorsal distance 728, preventral distance 560, preanal distance 754, snout 50, eye 65. Fin counts are dorsal 12, anal 10 and pectoral 15. This is an extremely large specimen of the species. Gadidae Gaidropsarus Rafinesque Kaup (1858) described a small gadid as Motella capensis but gave only a brief description and no locality, although on the basis of the trivial name it is believed to be South Africa. Small rocklings were described from St. Paul Island as M. capensis by Kner (1868) and Sauvage (1879), while Barnard (1925) published a description of material in the South African Museum which he also assigned to Kaup’s species. | Sivertsen described specimens from Tristan and showed that while they were very similar to those described from St. Paul Island, they showed marked differences from the South African specimens as described by Barnard. Since South Africa was believed to be the type locality of capensis, Sivertsen proposed a new name, G. znsularum for the Tristan and St. Paul Island specimens. On re-examining the material used by Barnard, I find that only one of the two fish he examined exactly fits the description he published, and that the two fish he examined appear to belong to two distinct species. This view is shared by Mr. A. Wheeler of the British Museum (Natural History), who has also examined the South African Museum material, and Professor J. L. B. Smith, who informs me that he has reached a similar opinion from examination of material in his collection (Table 1). TABLE I Comparison of Gaidropsarus Table 1a gives body proportions of two species of Gaidropsarus in millimetres and as thousandths of standard length in parenthesis. Table 1b compares body proportions of Gaidropsarus from various sources. 12719 G. insularum from False Bay 12528 G. capensis. Port Elizabeth 7858 G. capensis. East London A G. insularum from Tristan da Cunha (from Sivertsen, 1945) G. B capensis from South Africa (Barnard, 1925) THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 527 TABLE 1a 12719 12528 7858 Standard length .. 153 gi 156 Wepth*.. : : ~ oo naiaeie. a5 (r65)eee7 73) Head ; t ‘ are '20-ye (rQO)e 20-5 (206) 5 a8), W(212) Pe 46 90) 398 (42)e.) 573. (34) Snout ; : : : 8 (52) G*S. (75) 9:3 (60) Naferorbital . .° . 6™ (39) Ar (4Qp 4°5 (29) Bae lie le SF 5S (SeieuenO> (1FO)es) E7-2.( bro) mee ott dorsal. . 19 (85) 12 (rg2)*‘ 19 (122) me cians ts). 77 (500) 44 (485)y -76-5 (490) TABLE 1b A 12719 B 12528 7858 Depth/length : ; é . 64-7 62 6 6 6 Head/length ee is cae 54 4s 44 43 ieee... : é . 63-7 64 5 5¢ 64 Eye/interorbital . ; ; . I -14 iz +1 +1 14 and Pelvic ray/Origin ray to vent 2 3 3 3 3 Caudal peduncle/head : . 2%-a24 2k = 34 34 Rays, first dorsal ; : - 47-49 +45 55 65 56 Rays, second dorsal _ . : wy Gal 64 62 45 44. 43 Raywiwamal fine... «.- « «©, 52754 50 40 37 39 One specimen from Kalk Bay in the Cape Peninsula as well as some juveniles from Table Bay and Lambert’s Bay fitted the description of the Tristan fishes as given by Sivertsen and the St. Paul Island fishes as described by Kner and Sauvage, while the specimens from East London and Port Elizabeth are Clearly different, and are assumed to be G. capensis. Gaidropsarus insularum Sivertsen Motella capensis (non Kaup) Kner, 1868: 279. Sauvage, 1879: 42. Gaidropsarus capensis (non Kaup) Barnard, 1925: 323 (partim). Blanc, 1961: 145. Blanc & Paulian, 1957: 327- Gaidropsarus insularum Sivertsen, 1945: 8. Recorded from Tristan da Cunha, St. Paul Island, the Cape Peninsula and west coast of South Africa. Body proportions and fin counts given in Table 1. Gaidropsarus capensis (Kaup) Motella capensis Kaup, 1858: go. Gaidropsarus capensis (Kaup) Barnard, 1925: 323 (partim). Depth 6 in standard length, head about 44. Eye equal to interorbital about 6 in head. Second pelvic ray ? distance origin pelvic to vent. Caudal peduncle 3} in head. Fin counts: Free dorsal rays 55-65, Dorsal rays 42-45, Anal rays 36—40. Description based on two specimens, one of 91 mm standard length 528 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM deposited in the South African Museum (Reg. No. SAM 12528), collected in Algoa Bay at a depth of 25 fathoms by the Pieter Faure, and a second of 156 mm standard length in the collection of the Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown (Reg. No. 7858), collected at East London. Body proportions and fin counts are given in Table 1. G. capensis differs from insularum in having a relatively longer first dorsal base (12—13°5% of body length as opposed to about 8-5°%), a longer head, larger eye, slimmer caudal peduncle and rather marked differences in fin counts. Berycidae Beryx decadactylus Cuvier Beryx decadactylus Cuvier. Fowler, 1936: 542. One specimen obtained from Captain Scott, caught in “Tristan waters’. Tears in the mouth suggest that the fish was caught with hook and line but depth of capture is unknown. The fish is 362 mm standard length and has the following body proportions (expressed as thousandths of standard length): head 359, depth 472, eye 152, maxilla 185, base of anal fin 348, base of dorsal fin 290. Fin counts are dorsal IV 19, anal IV 27, pectoral 15, pelvic I 10. B. decadactylus has not been recorded from South Africa although the related B. splendens is trawled quite regularly. In the course of this work an unrecorded specimen of B. decadactylus was found in the collection of the South African Museum, trawled off Table Bay in 1948. It was 345 mm in standard length and had the following body proportions (in thousandths of Ls): head 322, depth 446, eye 125, maxilla 174, base of anal fin 359, base of dorsal fin 293. Fin counts are dorsal IV 20, anal IV 27, pectoral 15, pelvic I 10. Macrorhamphosidae Notopogon lillies Regan Notopogon lillies Regan, 1914: 14. Mohr, 1937: 50. Sivertsen (1945) records two specimens of Notopogon which were found washed up dead on Tristan. He assigned them to WV. Jilliei, a species known from South Africa, Australia and New Zealand. It should be noted, however, that his published figure (fig. 5) resembles V. macrosolen Barnard rather than N. lilliei, especially as neither the figure nor the text makes any reference to the dorsal brush which is a conspicuous feature of WV. lilliei but is absent in WV. macrosolen. Chilodactylidae Sivertsen (1945) recorded only one species of fish belonging to the family Chilodactylidae, Acantholatris monodactylus (Carmichael) ; called by the islanders the ‘Fivefinger’. THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 529 He claimed that the islanders spoke of a second fish very like the fivefinger which they were said to call the ‘yellowtail’. Rowan & Rowan (1955) have shown that the fish called yellowtail is Sertola lalandi. No additional species of chilodactylids have been received from Tristan but a species which appears to be new has been obtained from Vema Seamount. An additional species which appears to be undescribed has been obtained from Gough Island, but is not described here as only one specimen was obtained. It is known to fishermen as the ‘funny fish’. Acantholatris monodactylus (Carmichael) (Plate XXIs) Chaetodon monodactylus Carmichael, 1818: 500. Cheilodactylus carmichaelis Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830: 360. Kner, 1868: go. Chilodactylus monodactylus (Carmichael) Sauvage, 1879: 23; Regan, 1913a: 466. Norman, 1935): 57: Acantholatris monodactylus (Carmichael) Gill, 1863: 119. Sivertsen, 1945: 10. This species is known from Tristan and Gough Islands and has also been found to be common at the Vema Seamount. Gunther (1860) recorded this species from Chile but Norman (19354) has shown this to be a misidentification, the Chilean species being the related A. gayi (Kner). In Table 2 below are given body proportions and counts of several examples of the species from Tristan da Cunha, Gough Island and the Vema Seamount. TABLE 2 Body proportions and fin counts of Acantholatris monodactylus in thousandths of standard length. Origin of the specimen is: Cat. No. SAM 10500 Tristan da Cunha 10501 ‘Tristan da Cunha 11764 No history, but register says ‘Very likely Tristan’ 21284 ‘Tristan (perhaps!!) 22890 Gough 24288 Vema Seamount 24291 Vema Seamount Cat. No. SAM 11764 11784 11764 10500 10501 10501 21284 10501 24291 24288 22890 ERG ats ANT 50. eR iieoe.) | BiG) 2000 9192-9). 936" 91955) 1/.. 851 1) 92). 3929... 1336 Depth - 405 385 405 389 379 391 396 391 370 381 405 Bee i, PW GA. 78 82 75 75 76 67 62 62 59 56 Interorbital. . . 69 78 76 75 84 92 93 88 74. 79 88 Base of dorsal. . 656 620 634 657 625 630 638 636 636 £663 _~ 605 Paid 8s, TO 177 - 172 154 160 153 147 . 148. 153 ~— 169 Length of pectoral 351 B40) 820. 9349 Bas6y 3959 349 G00 325. 909 . 320 Snout to dorsal Peer 6 351 334 329 . 315 330. 344 379. 360. 343... 350 . 334 Snout to anal Sse 879 9700 715, \ 680... 6o3,).705 » 687.679. 674. 665 736 Snout to pectora Sues - 313 308. 323 303. 334. 332°. 942 340 332 3932 . 356 Worsal spines . . 17 16 ier 17 16 07 17 17 17 Li) 17 Dorsal rays,... . 25 25 25 25 26 25 26 25 25 25 2D Analspines. . . = 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pai TAYSE 3) 2 \ , TZ II 12 II II II II II II II 10 Gillrakers . . .7+14 8+15 8+15 8+14 8415 7+15 7+15 7HI15 530 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM One specimen (SAM 22890) obtained by Captain Scott at Gough Island has been assigned to A. monodactylus although the fin counts are lower than normal for the species. The body proportions fit within the range for A. mono- dactylus however and coloration in formalin is identical. Acantholatris vemae sp.n. (Plate XXIa, Table 3) MATERIAL Two specimens from the Vema Seamount collected by the Emerson K, November 1964, donated by the Division of Sea Fisheries, Sea Point (SAM 24.290, 24292). Five specimens (all gutted) from the Vema Seamount collected by com- mercial fishing vessels and donated by Messrs. Friedman & Rabinowitz (Pty.) Ltd. (SAM 24280, 24293, 24296-8). Two specimens from the Vema Seamount collected by Mr. A. C. Paterson, April 1965, and donated by the Division of Sea Fisheries (SAM 24525, 24527). Depth of body about 3, length of head about 3? in standard length. Eye diameter 5 in length of head, 2 in snout and 14 in interorbital width. Dorsal fin XVII 24-26, the eighth spine longest, about equal to snout, 4 in body depth. Last spine 24 in first ray. Base of dorsal a little over 14 in body length, distance snout to origin dorsal 34 in body, about equal to length of pectoral. Anal fin III 10-11, base short only + of dorsal base. Second spine very stout, only a little longer than third, shorter than first ray. Pectoral having 9 branched, 6 simple rays, first simple ray elongate, + body length, free portion 34 in length of ray. Forehead scaled to level of posterior nostril, both nostrils of similar size, round. Scales fairly large, very thin, lateral line 55-58, transverse 7g, cheeks scaled. Gill rakers, upper 6—7, lower 14-16, total 21-23. | Colour: in formalin, dark blue-black dorsally; fading to silver below. Edge of fins dark, caudal with a few dark bands. In life said to be bright blue. Detailed body proportions of the seven specimens are given in Table 3. TABLE 3 Catalogue No.: 24289 24290 24292 24293 24206 24297 24208 24525 24527 Standard length . . 327 320 385 249 72 338 392 384 383 Head. 28) awe. 288 271 260 277 255 264 263 266 253 Depth ... 2... 345 347 343 539 352 329 349 309 BS) VE Wie ie eet eee 58 57 52 56 54 53 51 50 55 Interorbital 37; 80 75 75 76 75 71 79 78 78 Base of dorsal . .. 624 660 673 650 683 663 666 690 682 Basé-ofanal oi)or2%. « 165 161 174 169 Dye 9s) 078 168 174 175 Se re oe ee be) ee eee el E THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 531 TABLE 3 (continued) Catalogue No.: 24289 24290 24292 24293 24206 24297 24298 24525 24527 Length of pectoral . 327 328 204. 321 328 34.0 319 354. 329 Snout to dorsal origin 306 306 288 297 272 278 283 204 287 Snout to anal origin 686 627 607 650 650 642 654. Snout to pectoral. . 303 278 299 273 253 255 268 263 264 Dorsalspines: . - - 17 17 1a 17 iy 17 17 Wormaliays) =< .- . 24 25 26 24 25 24. 25 Amalspines 9..: . . 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 PAGAL EAS he sw 5. « 10 10 i II II Hi II Body proportions (in thousandths of standard length) of Acantholatris vemae sp.n. from the Vema Seamount. Dates of collection of the various specimens given in the text. SAM 24527 the Holotype. The specimen deposited in the South African Museum (Reg. No. SAM 24527) is designated as the type. A. vemae is very close to A. monodactylus (both having 9 branched and 6 simple pectoral rays) which is also found on the Vema Seamount. It differs, however, in colour and colour pattern, lacking the six dark vertical bars found in monodactylus; also it has a markedly shorter head and slightly less deep body when compared to monodactylus. As a result of the shorter head, the distances of the snout to the origin of dorsal fin, the origin of anal fin and the origin of pectoral fin are proportionately less. The slope of the forehead in vemae too is steeper, and whereas it has the upper corner of the pectoral! fin angular it is rounded in monodactylus. Finally it has much thinner lips than monodactylus. It differs from A. gayi and A. aspersus in the pectoral not reaching the soft anal. Latris lineata (Bloch & Schneider) Cichla lineata Bloch & Schneider 1801: 342. Latris hecateia Richardson, 1839: 99. Richardson, 1842: 106. Gunther, 1860: 86. Kner, 1868: 95. Sauvage, 1879: 17. Angot, 1951: 19. Blanc & Paulian, 1957: 331. Blanc, 1961: 152. Two specimens, SAM 22623, 22891, both collected by Captain Scott at Gough Island. The former is a skin with standard length of about 900 mm and the latter a complete specimen of 904 mm. The body proportions of the 904. mm specimen (as thousandths of L’s) are as follows: head 324, depth 303, pectoral fin 192, snout 149, base of dorsal fin 638, base of anal fin 207. Fin counts are dorsal XVIII 35, anal III 26, pectoral 9 + 9. Counts of the skin are dorsal XVIII 36, anal III 26, pectoral 9 + 9, gill rakers 8 + 16. L. lineata was originally described from Australia and New Zealand, but has been recorded from St. Paul Island by Kner (1868), Sauvage (1879) and Angot (1951). This is the only species that is without doubt common to the Atlantic islands and Australasia. 532 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Serranidae Polyprion americanus (Bloch & Schneider) Amphiprion americanus Bloch & Schneider, 1801: 205. Polyprion americanus (Bloch & Schneider) Barnard, 1925: 488. Smith, 1949a: 199. Blanc, 1961: I . Pubes cernum Gunther, 1859: 169. Angot, 1951: 15. As noted above, Sivertsen listed two species of fish known to the Tristan islanders by common names that he was unable to identify due to lack of specimens. The fish called by the islanders the steambrass was said to be a very large fish, nearly as large as a shark (+ 2 metres) ‘but much broader and with soft rays in the fin’. Rowan & Rowan (1955) record an 8-foot long speci- men of Polyprion americanus from Tristan and state that it is the species the islanders refer to as the steambrass. Specimens were received from the Vema Seamount. Two examples from the Seamount of 465 and 602 mm standard length were found to have the length 2#— 83 times depth and 22— 2% of head length. In both the pectoral fin was slightly greater than half the head, while the longest dorsal spine went 24— 2% into head. The species occurring at Vema is thus clearly P. americanus rather than the related P. prognathus. Ephinephelus aeneus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire) Serranus aeneus Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809: 317. Fowler, 1936: 756. Epinephelus aeneus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire) Norman, 1935): 9. One specimen (SAM 24299) presented by Messrs. Friedman & Rabino- witz, Ltd., one of several landed by commercial fishing vessels from the Vema Seamount. Body proportions as thousandths of the standard length of 465 mm are as follows: head 402, depth 331, length pectoral fin 219, height longest (fifth) dorsal spine 123, eye 62, interorbital 64, snout 114, pelvis 172. The cheeks are scaled with cycloid scales, as is body above lateral line; scales ctenoid below lateral line. Caudal slightly rounded. Bottom opercular spine posterior to top spine. Pre-operculum serrated, angle produced with very long serrations, operculum acutely pointed. Mandible with two rows of teeth. Colour in formalin: Dark brown above shading to lighter below. Sparse scattered very dark brown spots. Unpaired fins dark edged, paired fins light grey-brown. Three dark stripes on face; one from posterior of eye to lowest opercular spine, one from below eye to edge of operculum opposite base of pectoral fin and the third above maxilla to pre-operculum below the angle. Carangidae Seriola lalandi Cuvier & Valenciennes Seriola lalandi Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1833: 208. Barnard, 1925: 555. Smith, 1949@: 221. Rowan & Rowan, 1955: 129. Seriola pappei (Castelnau) Smith, 1959: 256. THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 533 One specimen was donated by the Division of Sea Fisheries, caught at the Vema Seamount. It appears to be a very common fish there, as one com- mercial fishing vessel returned with over a thousand large specimens. It has also been recorded from Tristan da Cunha (Rowan & Rowan, 1955). Decapterus longimanus Norman Decapterus longimanus Norman, 19354: 255. Two specimens from the Vema Seamount (SAM 24294) presented by the Division of Sea Fisheries. The species was formerly considered endemic to Tristan da Cunha. The two specimens are the smallest yet recorded being 215 and 225 mm in standard length. Body proportions of the 215 mm specimen in thousandths of standard length are: head 288, depth 204, pectoral fin 260, base of soft dorsal 400, base of anal 335, gillrakers 44, scutes 42. Measurements could not be made on the other specimen as it was rather damaged, having been obtained from the gut of a larger fish. Emmelichthyidae Plagiogeneion rubiginosus (Hutton) Therapon rubiginosus (Hutton) 1876. Plagiogeneion rubiginosus (Hutton) McCulloch, 1914. Barnard, 1927. Smith, 19494. A single specimen was donated by Messrs. Friedman & Rabinowitz (Pty.) Ltd. The fish was about 330 mm in standard length and was caught by handline on the Vema Seamount. Unfortunately the fish had been cleaned and somewhat distorted in freezing so that accurate measurements were not possible. It could readily be distinguished from the related P. macrolepis by its lateral line count of 68 as opposed to about 50 in macrolepis. P. rubiginosus is recorded from Australasia and St. Paul Island, is not uncommon off the east coast of South Africa (Smith, 1949) and a single specimen has been recorded off Table Bay (Barnard, 1927). Pentacerotidae Pentaceros richardsoni Smith PenNceros richardson A. Smith, 1844 (Plate XXI and 2 pages unnumbered text). Follett & Dempster, 1963: 315. Smith, 1964: 572. Pentaceros knert Steindachner, 1866: 208. Pseudopentaceros richardsoni (Smith) Barnard, 1927: 621. Smith, 1949a: 242. Griffinetia nelsonensis, Whitley & Phillips, 1939: 233. Only a partial bibliography is given here; a more complete one is given by Follett & Dempster (1963). It should be pointed out, however, that in Follett & Dempster the references to Andrew Smith’s original description are incorrect. The plates each with a page or more of unnumbered text were 534 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM published separately between 1838 and 1847 but were not dated while only the index and title page were dated and published in 1849. (See Waterhouse, 1880, and Barnard, 1956.) Pentaceros richardsont was for long thought to be an extremely rare species of fish, being known from the type, an adult caught off Cape Point, South Africa, on a deep handline, and a few juveniles from Australia and New Zealand. Recently, however, many medium-sized fish have been obtained from the North Pacific (Follett & Dempster, 1963, give a complete set of published records) while Smith (1964) has described in detail a second adult fish from the Cape of Good Hope, and pointed out that the fish described from Cape Horn by Steindachner as P. kneri is clearly a juvenile of P. richardsoni. A juvenile of P. richardson obtained at Tristan was presented to the Museum by Captain Scott. Unfortunately there are no data as to its method or depth of capture. Measurements and counts of this juvenile are given in Table 4, and compared with published measurements and with those of two specimens in the South African Museum; a large adult specimen trawled off Cape Town in 300 fathoms during March 1961 (SAM 23076) and a slightly smaller speci- men trawled off Cape Columbine in April 1965 (SAM 24541) both presented to the Museum by Messrs. Irvin & Johnson, Ltd. TABLE 4 Standard length. Sia use. Pe UO be 2407 254? 803 4514 358° Head ‘ : . : : : 5 25 325 319 338 321 319 Depths 7: : é ; , ; PAIS 433 422 425 418 422 Eye 1 AU WEN aote * od 87 79 83 100 gI 76 Interorbital distance ye 2) 1), eet a LS 117 118 135 109 106 Least depth caudal peduncle . . 93 100 102 112 106 109 Dorsal spines . : : , : ee ESTE, 14 14 14 14 14 Dorsal rays. : ; : : . 89 9 9 10 9 10 Amalsspines 1) tae 2 ear oe aan 4 4 4 4 4 4 Anal rays Wan Pre gee eT. a. tS 7 7 7 8 8 7 Pectovally fhe vcigits sc deenk aie tenes 17-18 17 5] 18 rz 18 Gillrakers total , : ; ; 4 OR PR Eee = == — Lateral line scales . : : ‘ 68-69 71 76 — 86 a= Body proportions (in thousandths of standard length) and counts of Pentacerosrichardsoni from various localities. * Japan (Abe, 1957). 2 North Pacific (Welander et al., 1957). 3 Tristan da Cunha (Reg. No. SAM 21791). 4 Cape of Good Hope (Reg. No. SAM 23076). 5 Cape of Good Hope (Reg. No. SAM 24541). P. richardsoni is probably found throughout the world in the warm temper- ate waters, but the published records of its occurrence are confined to a few scattered localities. At most of these places it has been found more than once. Both Follett & Dempster (1963) and Smith (1964) suggested reasons for this, but it seems likely that the known distribution of the species bears no relation a we! THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 535 to the true distribution but is due mainly to the widely scattered areas of intensive fishing and the introduction of new fishing techniques in various areas. Thunnidae Thunnus spp. Several species of the genus Thunnus have been landed by commercial fishing vessels from the Vema Seamount. Unfortunately all specimens have been brought ashore gutted and without heads or fins. Many small tuna (about 50—75 lb. whole weight) had bright yellow peduncle keels which is characteristic of the southern bluefin (T. maccoyi Castelnau) (known from South Africa and Australia), while others were stated by the fishermen to be yellow- fins (J. albacares (Bonaterre) ) and bigeyes (7. obesus (Lowe) ). Mr. A. Heydorn (Division of Sea Fisheries) (fers. comm.) informs me that he saw a yellowfin while diving on the Vema Seamount. Until whole examples are obtained nothing definite can be stated con- cerning the species of tuna congregating about the Seamount. Stromateidae Palinurichthys antarcticus (Carmichael) Perca antarctica Carmichael, 1818: 501. Seriollella antarctica (Carmichael) Regan, 1913a: 467. Seriolella antarctica (Carmichael) Sivertsen, 1945: 21. Palinurichthys porosus (Carmichael) Barnard, 1948: 395. Smith, 19494: 304. Mupus perciformis (Mitchill, 1818: 244). Smith, 1949): 843. The Tristan bluefish was first described and figured by Carmichael (1818). It was not discussed by Regan in his review of the Stromateidae (1902), but in a later paper Regan (1913) reviewed the fishes described by Carmichael and suggested, but without giving reasons, that antarctica was ‘rather closely related to Sauvage’s Seriollella velaini from the Island of St. Paul’. Sivertsen (1945) placed antarctica in the genus Seriolella, but again no reasons for doing so were given; nor was the generic definition modified. According to Regan (1902) the genus Seriolella had inter alia the following characters: a fin formula of VIII 27-40; anal III 19-24, and a lateral line concurrent with the dorsal profile. The fin formula of antarctica on the other hand is dorsal IX 18-20, anal III 14-15, and the lateral line becomes straight before the caudal peduncle. The correct genus for antarctica would thus appear to be Palinurichthys Bleeker 1859. A specimen of P. antarcticus was donated to the Museum by the Director, Division of Sea Fisheries, after it had died while on display in the Sea Point Aquarium. The fish was unquestionably a Tristan bluefish although actually obtained from Gough Island. When compared with other Palinurichthys material in the Museum collection it showed a marked resemblance to two similar sized fish in the collection recorded by Barnard (1948) as P. porosus (Richardson). 536 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM TABLE 5 24532 19573 19557 23311 } : Standard length . . . 884 436 453 432 35 34 Head we eee 339 351 356 358 370 380 Depths. WV des SAT 344 335 358 400 380 Length anal fin base. . IgI 222 212 226 230 235 Diameter eveke ts. f-.,us 75 66 75 2 103 103 Length pectoral fin’. . — 266 274 306 260 265 Length pelvic fin hee es 152 160 166 158 245 235 Snout Te LER ve 105 88 95 102 86 88 Wiascillciaals wih menciiiot cc 153 138 150 150 145 147 Pectoral.rays’? 1, te oy. 21 QI 21 20 —_ — Dorsalispines’)) 3) OP or Bar 8 Se Donsalmaysys rue) eflioms, 19 19 18 20 19 19 ATV SITES Hk lees: 3 8 3 3 3 +s Anal rays ope Meat ce 14. 15 14 14 14 14 Body proportions in thousandths of standard length and counts of P. antarcticus from the Cape and Gough Island and P. porosa from the Kermadac Islands. SAM 19573 NW. of Cape Town 19557 NW. of Cape Town 23311 Gough Island 24532 Vema Seamount 1 Kermadec Islands. Collection of the British Museum (Natural History). Body proportions and counts are given (Table 5) for the Gough Island fish, the two Cape fish and a larger specimen caught at the Vema Seamount by Mr. A. C. Paterson and presented by the Division of Sea Fisheries. As far as proportions and fin counts are concerned it is clear that there are no signifi- cant differences between the fish that could be construed as being of a specific nature. | In all four examples the pectoral fin is long and falcate, reaching the anal origin. The preoperculum has a curved scaled patch and the operculum is completely scaled. There is also a small patch of scales on the head above the preoperculum, as shown in Barnard (1948, fig. 14). The mouth is large, reaching the posterior edge of the pupil. The origin of the dorsal fin is posterior to the pectoral fin base. P. porosus is known from the coast of Australia and the Kermadec Islands. Seven juveniles from the latter locality, kindly lent by the British Museum (Natural History), were compared with P. antarcticus. Several differences in body proportions were apparent (Table 5), as well as the shape of the pectoral fin. Regan (1902), however, mentioned that the stromatid fishes changed considerably in body shape during growth, especially in that the pelvic fin becomes shorter and the pectoral fin becomes falcate in shape. Although there are marked differences in the size of the fishes examined (over 430 mm as opposed to about 35 mm in total length), the similarity in pattern of the scales of the head suggest that P. porosus is at least very closely related to P. antarcticus. In recent years large numbers of stromatid fishes assigned to the species \ THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 537 P. porosus have been reported from Australian waters (Cowper, 1960) but no redescription or figure of a specimen larger than the type of 140 mm has been published. Two stromatids have been recorded from St. Paul Island, Seriolella velaint which has a fin formula of dorsal VIII 27 and anal III 20 (Sauvage, 1879), and P. porosus, which was recorded and briefly described by Angot (1951). His brief description could apply equally to porosus or antarcticus, but the sketch shows a fish with a long falcate pectoral fin characteristic of antarcticus rather than the short rounded fin as shown in Richardson’s figures of the type of porosus. In the North Atlantic there is another related species, P. perciformis (Mitchill) which Smith (1949)) recorded from the west coast of South Africa. This species appears to be generally smaller than antarcticus; it is said to be dark green in colour (Jordan & Evermann, 1896) whereas antarcticus is blue; the dorsal spines after the fourth are subequal (Regan, 1902) whereas in antarcticus and porosus they decrease in size and, finally, the pectoral fin in perciformis (as figured by Merriman, 1945) is markedly shorter and less falcate than in antarcticus, even at the largest recorded size (284 mm L’s). It would appear therefore that there are two closely related species of Palinurichthys in the Atlantic Ocean, a northern species P. perciformis (Mitchill, 1818) and a southern species P. antarcticus (Carmichael, 1818). P. antarcticus has been found in South Africa, at Tristan and Gough Islands, the Vema Sea- mount and also appears to be present at St. Paul Island in the southern Indian Ocean. If adult specimens of porosus and antarcticus are compared and found to be conspecific P. porosus (Richardson, 1845) must be relegated to the synonomy of antarcticus. Mupus imperialis Gocco Mupus imperialis Cocco 1833: 20. Smith, 1949): 843. Mupus ovalis Smith, 19494: 303. Lirius ovalis Barnard, 1948: 392. This species seems very common on the Seamount and grows to a large size, probably at least to 1 metre in length. In view of its rounded head it is called ‘stumpnose’ or ‘biskop’ by South African fishermen visiting Vema. Two specimens have been examined. In thousandths of standard lengths of 590 mm and 762 mm the present specimens have the following respective body pro- portions: head 289-297, depth at pelvic origin 334-343, max. depth 393-370, snout 76—79, eye 68-66, pectoral fin 263-244, base of dorsal fin 728. Counts were dorsal VI-VII 28, —28, anal III 20-21. M. imperialis has been recorded from wide areas of the Atlantic and the Mediterranean and appears to grow to a large size. Sivertsen (1945) described as new a stromatid fish collected at Tristan which he named Seriolella christo- phersent. From the description I can find no significant characters whereby this species differs from M. imperialis. Both have similar body proportions, especially 538 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM the large eye and rounded head, rather small mouth and a body which is deepest posterior to the pelvic fin origin. The counts for the unique specimen of christophersent are all within the range for M. imperialis. Coryphaenidae Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758: 261. Fowler, 1936: 649. Gibbs & Collette, 1959: 117. Two small specimens of this species were collected at the Vema Seamount by Mr. Paterson of the Division of Sea Fisheries. Both specimens (SAM 24531) are immature, being only 352 and 375 mm in standard length, but are clearly hippurus rather than the related equiselis, having total gillraker counts of 9-10 and 62-63 dorsal rays. Scorpaenidae Scorpaena scrofa Linnaeus Scorpaena scrofa Linnaeus, 1758: 266. Smith, 1957: 51 Scorpaena natalensis Regan, 1906: 5. Barnard, 1927: 902. Smith, 19494: 371. One specimen from a commercial fishing vessel at the Verma Seamount. Body proportions as thousandths of standard length (313 mm) are as follows: head 418, depth 313, eye 80, interorbital 73, snout 130, dorsal base 534, anal base 125, pectoral 265. Congridae Ariosoma australis (Barnard) Congermuraena australis Barnard, 1923: 442. Barnard, 1925: 190. Sivertsen, 1945: 4. Arissoma balearica (non de la Roche) Smith, 19494: 393 partim. Congermuraena ?habenata (Richardson, 1845: 109). Sivertsen, 1945: 4. Barnard (1923) described two species of congrid eels as Congermuraena australis and C’. albescens, the former from shallow water at the Cape of Good Hope and Tristan da Cunha and the latter from deep water at the Cape. Sivertsen (1945) obtained one specimen at Tristan, and, although he assigned it to C.. australis, he stated that there were minor differences between his specimen and Barnard’s description, and suggested that the Tristan species may be C’. habanata Richardson, known from New Zealand and St. Paul Island. Smith (1949a) reduced both australis and albescens to the synonymy of the Mediterranean species Ariosoma balearica (de la Roche) but gave no reasons for doing so. A careful examination of A. australis from shallow water at the Cape and Tristan and A. albescens (from deep water off the Cape) has shown the two eels to have clear differences. Body proportions are given in Table 6. There is little difference between the fish in so far as the body proportions are concerned except that the eye in albescens is proportionally smaller and the interorbital width greater than in australis from the Cape and with the Tristan fish having an intermediate eye size but a narrow interorbital width. es ee ee! ee ee ee rl ee Eee } Ht b, it eS ee * ae THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 539 In general appearance, however, the fish from Tristan are very similar to australis, which differs from albescens in the following characters: in australis the rays in the vertical fins are clearly visible, the fin has a dark edge, the lateral line has one tiny pore to each myotome, the upper dentition has a rather Lb Fig. 1 Upper tooth patterns of a, Ariosoma australis syntype; b, Ariosoma albescens holotype. (Diagrammatic and not to scale.) elongate, slender pattern (fig. 1a), the body is well formed and firm, and I can find no trace of the epidermal processes stated by Castle (1960) to occur on the body of A. balearica. In albescens the vertical fins are enclosed in a thick gelatinous envelope, the fins are pale edged, the lateral line is a distinct ridge and has a 540 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM large lower pore and a small upper one to each myotome, the pattern of the upper dentition is shorter and heavier (fig. 1b), there are distinct epidermal processes present and, finally, the body is soft and flabby. It is unlikely that the differences are due to changes taking place during growth, as a specimen of australis at 280 mm was found to be fully mature and to have ripe ovaries containing large eggs. Smith’s (19492) combining of australis and albescens is therefore considered to be incorrect. A. balearica is known from the tropical Atlantic and the Mediterranean (Fowler, 1936) and is very similar to A. australis. It, too, has a very indistinct lateral line which will separate it from A. albescens. There is also very little difference between australis and A. habenata from New Zealand and St. Paul Island as pointed out by Sivertsen (1945) and between the New Zealand deep- water species Pseudoxenomystax hirsutus Castle (1960) and the South African deepwater species A. albescens. Castle divides the two species by the position of the origin of the dorsal fin, stating that it lies over the gill slit in hirsutus and at a level half-way along the pectoral in Smith’s specimens of ‘balerica’. In the " type of albescens (designated in the museum catalogue as SAM 12775) the origin of the dorsal is above the pectoral origin. TABLE 6 Catalogue No. SAM: 12781 12781 12780 12781 18097 12782 24551 12775 18097 18097 Standard length. ... 206° 2925 238 274 261 186 960s pieeee Depth - os ee se 590167 6 BU 85547 5G | Oa Head 2.0: . se). 660 160 J t6Oirspoee 760. 161 | yheiee Head‘to vent «©. . «398 9) 301 #)406))) 392 69403 976° “AOR eigen Vent to tail’)... . (606° «| “G089 V5g2. "G07 597° «635 «= 5 eee Evel Gore Wer aaa. shag 38 38 40 32 34 33 25 26 au Imtcronoitala: amt a aul 16 13 16 II 16 18 37 26 26 Snout to oyigin dorsal. .. 180 182 \ 389 (972 “(162.0 178 460 eee Snout to origin anal 2147 Ope 420° 405, 403 — 481 — — teloiie cullslviv ae a be wal 18 107) 18 18 21 19 25 — — Body proportions (in thousandths of standard length) of Ariosoma australis from South Africa and Tristan da Cunha and A. albescens from South Africa. SAM 12780 A. australis paratype, collected Kalk Bay 12781 A. australis, Kalk Bay 18097 A. australis, Kalk Bay 12782 A. australis, Tristan 24551 A. australis, Tristan 12775 A. albescens, holotype, deep water off Cape Town 23189 A. albescens, deep water off Cape Town The systematics of this group of eels is in a very confused state, there being little agreement even at the generic level, and until such time as a careful revision of the family is made on a world-wide basis it will be impossible to decide whether A. habenata, A. australis from the Cape, A. australis from Tristan and several other species are in fact distinct species or are only geographical | variants. It is considered advisable therefore that the existing species be retained THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 54.1 in the meantime. It would be surprising, however, if the Tristan and St. Paul Island eels are specifically different. Lagocephalidae Sphaeroides cutaneus (Gunther) Tetrodon cutaneus Gunther, 1870: 287. Barnard, 1927: 971. Sphaeroides dubius von Bonde, 1923: 40. Sphaeroides cutaneus (Gunther) Smith, 19494: 417. This large species of puffer fish is found throughout the warm, temperate and tropical seas. It is known from the Cape and St. Helena Island. Three specimens from Vema were collected and presented by Mr. Paterson (SAM 24524). All three were a dirty grey-green dorsally with a white belly. Dorsal, anal and pectoral fins were pale yellow. The pectoral fin has a charac- teristic shape, being broad, rounded on the lower distal corner, and pointed at the upper. The species is capable of very extensive inflation and all three examples examined were much distorted due to this. ZOOGEOGRAPHY The relative geographical positions of the islands of Tristan da Cunha, Gough, St. Paul, Marion and Crozet, the Vema Seamount and South Africa are shown in figure 2. Tristan, Gough and St. Paul islands lie on very similar latitudes, whereas the Vema Seamount is roughly as far north of Tristan as the Marion and Crozet groups are south. The Vema Seamount, however, has several fish in common with Tristan whereas the Marion and Crozet groups have no fish in common with Tristan or St. Paul. This, as was suggested by Sivertsen (1945), is almost certainly due to hydrographic conditions, mainly water temperatures. e Mauritius * Reunion Vem e Port Elizabeth Amsterdam 4 Tristan t. Paul» + Gough E Prince s.. Crozet ae . Marion e award Fig, 2 Shallow-water areas in the southern Atlantic and Indian Oceans. 542 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM There are two areas of sudden temperature change in the Southern Ocean, the Sub-Tropical Convergence, where the surface temperature rapidly changes from about 13°C to about 9°C and a more southerly line, the Antarctic Con- vergence, where the surface temperature again drops, from 6°C to about 2°C. The Antarctic Convergence is quite narrow but the Sub-Tropical Convergence is much broader and Sverdrup ¢é¢ al. (1942) refer to it as a Region of Conver- gence. The Sub-Tropical Convergence fluctuates in latitude, at times the whole zone is 5-6° South of the Island and at other times Deacon (1937) suggests that it may be north of Tristan. Temperatures taken at Gough Island at a time when he suggested this do not support it, however. Gough Island is approximately 3° 20’ south of Tristan, thus it may lie north or south of the Convergence according to the conditions prevailing in the ocean. Both, however, probably normally le north of or within the Con- vergence zone, while Vema always lies well to the north and the Marion and Crozet group well to the south. There is little published data available giving water temperatures at Tristan and even less for Vema or Gough. Christophersen & Schon (1942) published detailed sea surface temperature records taken during the Nor- wegian expedition to Tristan. The main features were: Temperatures in °C Month Average Lowest Highest December 1937 are 15°7 15:0 16-4 January ogo). | tao es ae Oey 14°8 17°9 Hebruary 1Q¢on. 07... 1776 19°8 March 1938 Pe LE PETG 18-0 20°0 The above are all surface temperatures taken from the shore. Two stations worked by R.V. Discovery gave surface temperatures of 14°59°C (Station 4) in January and 12-95°C (Station 397) in May. Station 4 was taken close inshore where the bottom was only 37 metres. A subsurface sample at 35 m gave a temperature of 13°64°C. Gough Island too appears to have a very deep thermocline, stations worked by the R.V. William Scoresby in June 1927 showed the following: Temperatures in °C’ at Sample Depth Station Date om 100 m 150 m W/s 122 7-8/6/27 11°59 11°69 9°89 125 9/6/27 11°63 11°49 10°99 126 10/6/27 11°79 11°70 9°69 130 12/6/27 12°09 12°09 10°71 In April 1965, the supply ship R.S.A. recorded surface temperatures at Gough Island ranging from 11°8°C to 137°C over two days (Crawford, pers. comm.). The main fishing areas at Tristan and Gough are in shallow (under 50 metres) water. At this depth it would seem that there is normally but little difference between surface and ambient temperature of the bottom living species. THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 543 The surface temperatures at Vema are significantly higher, the Emerson K found surface temperatures of between 18-3°C and 18-8°C in November 1964 (Simpson & Heydorn, 1965) and in April 1965 the R.V. Africana IT obtained the following temperatures on and about the Seamount: Sounding Sampling depth Temperature Station (metres ) (metres ) "6 A.3617 go O 20°44 50 20°13 80 18°50 A.3620 goo O 20°37 50 20°35 100 16°15 A.3624 480 fo) 20°40 50 20°38 100 16-63 A.3625 73 fo) 20:36 59 20°33 A.3626 goo O 20°35 50 20:28 100 15°51! There is a more rapid decrease in water temperature in the first hundred metres at Vema than at the two southern islands, but the ambient temperature of the bottom living species (main fishing areas are 70-80 metres deep) is still several degrees higher than at Tristan or Gough. It is probable that this bottom temperature is close to the maximum for the fish at Vema which are more normally associated with cooler water (Acantholatris spp. and Palinurichthys antarctica) and yet still suitable for sub- tropical species (Sertola lalandiit and Epinephalus aeneus). The surface water temperature at Vema throughout the year, and at Tristan occasionally in the summer is suitable for tropical and subtropical surface pelagic species (Coryphaena hippurus, Sphaeroides cutaneus and Exocoetidae) . Cool water surface species, however, such as Thyrsites atun, common at Tristan, appear to avoid the warm water and have not been found at Vema. TABLE 7 South Tristan Gough Vema Africa St. Paul (a) Coast fishes Gaidropsarus insularum. . + 4 qe Acantholatris monodactylus — +- ae Acantholatris vemae . NG + aS Bovichthys diacanthus Decapterus longimanus . . Labrichthys ornatus . . . Helicolenus tristanensis . Sebastichthys capensis Scorpaena scrofa Epinephalus aeneus 4 Caesioperca coatsi. . . . + Ariosoma australis. . 2°. + + tS ee fe + Ser -+- ++ 544 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM South Tristan Gough Vema Africa St. Paul (6b) Oceanic fishes Prionace glauca + + Alepisaurus ferox . + Maurolicus muelleri . a + Myctophum humboldti . -- + Scomberesox saurus + -. Exocoetus exsiliens . -|- Cypstlurus lineatus ae a5 Beryx decadactylus . + 4. Sertola lalandi . . o+ a + Plagiogeneton rubiginosus . + + Pentaceros richardsoni ao + Polyprion americanus + + + Notopogon ?macrosolen . 4. = Thunnus spp. - + Thyrsites atun . =5 a8 +. Mupus imperialis . + + ae Palinurichthys antarcticus . + + + =e "y Coryphaena hippurus . . . a aa Sphaeroides cutaneus . . . > — Distribution of fishes, known from the Islands of Tristan da Cunha and Gough and the Vema Seamount. Sivertsen felt that there was a large number of fish endemic to Tristan (33% of the known fish) and a greater similarity with St. Paul Island than South Africa. Table 7, which lists all the fish known from Tristan, Vema and Gough, is divided into oceanic and coastal species in much the same manner as arranged by Sivertsen. It is never easy, however, to distinguish between oceanic and coastal species and some, considered to be coastal by Sivertsen, are here listed as oceanic. Thirteen species are considered coastal, of these eight are found at Tristan, seven at Gough and six at Vema. Three of these species also occur definitely at St. Paul Island and four in South Africa. None of the species definitely occur at all five localities and only one at Tristan, Gough and Vema. It is not agreed with Sivertsen that Tristan has a large proportion of endemic fish, in fact it is a surprising conclusion that this isolated island has no endemic fish species. Vema, however, appears to have one, as does Gough. It is also surprising that such an apparently successful species as A. monodactylus has reached Vema but not South Africa. Almost all the oceanic species listed in Table 7 are known from Tristan, only the tropical species being absent. All species recorded from Tristan are also known from South Africa, a few from Vema and almost none from Gough. This pattern is almost certainly due more to the varying intensities to which the various areas have been fished than to any real differences. Some of the species recorded from Tristan are deep-living bathypelagic species that have either been caught on the surface at night or have come into shallow water due to the abrupt elevation of the ocean floor. Such species are Maurolicus muelleri, Myctophum humboldti, Alepisaurus ferox, and Pentaceros rich- THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 545 ardsoni. All are species which have been found in widely scattered parts of the world. Other fish again are surface-living pelagic forms not normally found close to land but presumably attracted by the rich food available at the edges of the oceanic islands and in the shallow water over the Vema Seamount. Fish of this type recorded are Coryphaena hippurus and Thunnus spp. from Vema, and Scomberesox saurus, Prionace glauca and Exocoetus exsiliens from Tristan. Another group of pelagic fishes are also wide ranging but normally congre- gate close to land. Seriola lalandi, Thyrsites atun and Sphaeroides cutaneus are of this type. The first has been taken at both Vema and Tristan, the second only at Tristan and the third only at Vema. All three, however, are known from South Africa and the east coast of America. Palinurichthys antarcticus is possibly a similar fish but has a deep pelagic habitat rather than occurring close to the surface. It appears to have a very wide distribution, being known from all three areas discussed, South Africa, probably St. Paul Island and possibly Australia and New Zealand. Some of the species which have a wide geographic distribution are small, weakly swimming, species, e.g. Labrichthys ornatus which is known from Tristan and St. Paul islands, and probably also Gough (Holdgate 1948) and Vema (Heydorn, fers. comm., underwater sighting). Other widely distributed, but weakly swimming species are Ariosoma australis which occurs in South Africa and Tristan, and possibly St. Paul as well and Gazdropsarus insularum known from South Africa, Tristan and St. Paul. Both the latter two species have pelagic larval stages. Rowan & Rowan (1955) mention large fish seen jumping in the vicinity of Tristan. At times, in summer, the surface water temperature at Tristan reaches a temperature quite suitable for Tuna, Blue and White Marlin and Broadbill Swordfish. Jsurus glaucus has been recorded from St. Paul (Blanc, 1961). It is interesting that no elasmobranchs other than Prionace glauca have been recorded from the areas discussed, although ‘spiny dog fish’ Squalus fernandinus, are common at St. Paul (Blanc & Paulian, 1957). None of the gadids, thought by Rowan & Rowan (1955) to belong to at least two species, have been obtained. They thought that one belonged to the genus Haloporphyrus but as they obtained only damaged specimens washed ashore by storms, identification was not possible. SUMMARY The fishes known from the newly discovered Vema Seamount are described and compared with those found off Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island. A new species of chilodactylid, Acantholatris vemae, is described from Vema. The genus Gaidropsarus from Tristan and South Africa is discussed and the South African material shown to belong to two species, G. insularum, also known from 546 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM Tristan and St. Paul Island, and G. capensis from the south-east coast of South Africa. An attempt is made to relate the fish fauna to what is known of the hydro- graphic conditions around the islands. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For the material on which this paper is based I am indebted to the Director and staff, Division of Sea Fisheries, Sea Point (especially Messrs. Heydorn, Nepgen and Paterson), Capt. M. T. Scott, Messrs. Friedman & Rabinowitz (Pty.) Ltd., and Messrs. Irvin & Johnson (Pty.) Ltd., all of Cape Town. Material was lent by the Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History) and Professor J. L. B. Smith of Rhodes University, Grahamstown. | Unpublished data on water temperatures were supplied by Mr. A. Crawford, Mr. G. Stander and Mr. M. Orren, while Mr. A. Wheeler of the British Museum helped with much useful information. Finally I am grateful to my wife, Dr. Mary-Lou Penrith, for checking the manuscript, and to the Librarian, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, who obtained photocopies of several papers not available to me. The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to cover the cost of publishing this paper. REFERENCES Ase, T. 1957. New, rare and uncommon fishes from Japanese waters. VI. Notes on the rare fishes of the family Histiopteridae. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 6: 35-40, 71-74. Ancot, M. 1951. Observations sur la fauna marine et la peche aux [les Saint-Paul et Amster- dam. Mem. Instit. Sct. Madagascar (A) 6 (1): I-51. BARNARD, K. H. 1923. Diagnoses of new species of marine fishes from South African waters. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 13: 439-445. BARNARD, K. H. 1925. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa I. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21: 1-418. BARNARD, K. H. 1927. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa II. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21: 419-1065. BARNARD, K. H. 1948. Further notes on South African Marine fishes. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 36: 341-406. BARNARD, K. H. 1956. The dates of issue of the ‘Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa’ and the ‘Marine Investigations in South Africa’, 7. Soc. Bibl. nat. Hist. 2: 187-189. Bianc, M. 1961. Les poissons des terres australes et antarctiques Francaise. Mem. Inst. Sci. Mada- gascar (F) 4: 109-159. Bianco, M. & Pauttan, P. 1957. Poissons des Iles Saint-Paul et Amsterdam. Mem. Inst. Sci. Madagascar (F) 1: 325-335. Biocu, M. E. & Scunewwer, J. G. 1801. Systema Ichthyologicae. Saxony, Berolini. Bruun, A. F. 1935. Flying fishes (Exocoetidae) of the Atlantic. Dana Rep. 6: 1-106. CARMICHAEL, D. 1818. Some account of the Island of Tristan da Cunha and of its natural resources. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 12: 493-513. Caste, P. H. J. 1960. Two eels of the genus Pseudoxenomystax from New Zealand waters. Trans. roy. Soc. N.Z. 88: 463-472. Cocco, A. 1833. Su di alcuni pesci de mari di Messina. Giorn. Sci. Lett. Arti. Sicilia 42: 9-21. Cowper, T. R. 1960. Occurrence of Pyrosoma on the continental slope. Nature Lond. 187: 878-879. Cuvier, G. L. & VALENCIENNES, A. 1830. Histoire naturelle des Poissons 5. Paris: F. G. Levrault. THE FISHES OF TRISTAN, GOUGH AND THE VEMA SEAMOUNT 547 Deacon, G. E. R. 1937. The hydrology of the southern ocean. ‘Discovery’ Rept. 15: 3-124. DiscoOvERY ComMITTEE. Discovery Investigations Station-List, 1925-1926. ‘Discovery’ Rept. _E: I-140. FOLLETT, W. J. & Dempster, L. j. 1963. Relationships of the percoid fish Pentaceros riokiadsont Smith, with description of a specimen from the coast of California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 32: 315-338. Fow.er, H. W. 1936. The marine fishes of west Africa. Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. 70: 1-1493. GEOFFROY-SAINT-HILLAIRE, [. 1809. Histoire naturelle des Poissons de la mer ee et la Mediterraneé. Descrip. de ? Egypte Hist. nat. 1: 311-343. Gress, R. H. & Couette, B. B. 1959. On the identification, distribution and biology of the i gigas Coryphaena hippurus and C. equiselis. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. g: 117-152. Git, T. 1863. Synopsis of the family of Cirrhitoids. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 1862: 102-124. GunTHER, A. 1859. Catalogue of the Acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum 1. London: Taylor & Francis. GunTHER, A. 1960. Catalogue of the Acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum 2. London: Taylor & Francis. GunTHER, A. 1870. Catalogue of the Acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum 8. London: Taylor & Francis. Houpeate, M. 1958. Mountains in the Sea. London: Macmillan. Hutton, F. W. 1876. Contributions to the Ichthyology of New Zealand. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Instit. 8: 209-218. Jorpan, D. S. & Evermann, B. W. 1896. The fishes of north and middle America. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus. 47: 1-1240. Kaup, J. 1858. Ubersicht der Family Gadidae. Arch. Naturgesch. 24: 85-93. Kner, R. 1867. Zool. Theil Fische. Reise der osterreichen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 3: 275-433. Vienna: Staatsdrucken. MirtcuE Lt, S. L. 1818. Memoirs on Ichthyology. The fishes of New York described and arranged. Amer. Mon. Mag. 2: 244-245. Monr, E. 1937. Revision der Centriscidae. Dana Rept. 13: 1-69. Norman, J. R. 1935(a). The Carangid fishes of the genus Decapterus Bleeker. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 16: 252-264. Norman, J. R. 1935(4). Coast fishes I. The South Atlantic. ‘Discovery’ Rept. 12: 3-58. Recan, C. T. 1902. A revision of the family Stromateidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (7) 10: 115-132; 194-207. Recan, C. T. 1913(a). The fishes described by Carmichael from Tristan da Cunha. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (8) 14: 498-504. Recan, C. T. 1913(6). The Antarctic fishes of the Scottish National Antarctic expedition. Scot. nat. Antarct. Exp. Sci. Res. Scotia. 4: 311-374. Recan, C. T. 1914. Diagnoses of new marine fishes collected by the British Antarctic (Terra Nova) expedition. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (8) 13: 11-17. RicHARDSsON, J. 1839. Account of a collection of fishes from Port Arthur, Van Diemens Land. Proc. Kool. Soc. Lond. 7: 95-100. RicHARDSON, J. 1842. Description of Australian Fish. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 3: 69-185. RicHarpson, J. 1844-1848. Ichthyology of the voyage of H.M.S. Erebus and Terror. London. Rowan, M. K. & Rowan, A. N. 1955. Fishes of Tristan da Cunha. S. Afr. J. Sci. 52: 129. SauvaceE, H. E. 1879. La faune ichthyologique de I’Ie Saint-Paul. Arch. Zool. exp. gen. 8: 1-46. Simpson, E. S. Q. & Heyporn, A. E. F. 1965. Vema Seamount. Nature Lond. 207: 249-251. SIVERTSEN, E. 1945. Fishes of Tristan da Cunha with remarks on age and growth based on scale readings. Results Norweg. Exped. T. da Cunha 2 (12): 1-44. SmirH, A. 1844. Expedition into the interior of South Africa in 1834-36. Smiru, J. L. B. 1949(a). The Sea Fishes of Southern Africa. Cape Town: C.N.A. SmirH, J. L. B. 1949(5). The Stromateid fishes of South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 2: 839-851. SmitH, J. L. B. 1957. The fishes of the family Scorpaenidae in the Western Indian Ocean I. Ichthyol. Bull. Rhodes Univ. 4: 49-69. SmiTH, J. L. B. 1959. Serioline fishes (Yellowtails: Amberjacks) from the Western Indian Ocean. Ichthyol. Bull. Rhodes Univ. 15: 255-261. SmitH, J. L. B. 1964. Fishes of the family Pentacerotidae. Ichthyol. Bull. Rhodes Univ. 29: 567-578. 548 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM STEINDACHNER, F. 1866. Ichthologische Notizen 3. Uber einige neue Fisch-Arten aus Sid- america. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien 53: 208-214. SvERpRuP, H. U., Jounson, M. W. & Fieminc, R. H. 1942. The Oceans. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Von Bonpbe, C. 1923. Shallow water fishes procured by the S.S. Pickle. Fish. Mar. Biol. Surv. Rept. 3: 1-40. WateErRuHOusE, F. H. 1880. On the dates of publication of the parts of Sir Andrew Smith’s Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1880: 489-491. WELANDER, A. D. et al. 1957. Occurence of the boar fish Pseudopentaceros richardsoni and the zeid Allocyttus verrucosas in the North Pacific, Copeia 1957: 244-245. Wuittey, G. P. & Puiturrs, W. J. 1939. it sie notes on some New Zealand fishes. Trans. roy. Soc. N.Z. 69: 228-236. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. XLVIII Plate XXI A. Acantholatris vemae sp.n. Type of 383 mm. standard length. B. Acantholatris monodactylus. Specimen of similar size from Vema seamount. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS MANUSCRIPTS In duplicate (one set of illustrations), type-written, double spaced with good margins, including TaBLeE oF CoNTENTs and Summary. Position of text-figures and tables must be indicated. ILLUSTRATIONS So proportioned that when reduced they will occupy not more than 4? in. = 7 in. (74 in. including the caption). A scale (metric) must appear with all photographs. REFERENCES Authors’ names and dates of publication given in text; full references at end of paper in alphabetical order of authors’ names (Harvard system). References at end of paper must be given in this order: Name of author, in capitals, followed by initials; names of joint authors connected by &, not ‘and’. Year of publication; several papers by the same author in one year designated by suffixes a, b, etc. Full title of paper; initial capital letters only for first word and for proper names (except in German). Title of journal, abbreviated according to World list of scientific periodicals and underlined (italics). Series number, if any, in parenthesis, e.g. (3), (n.s.), (B.). Volume number in arabic numerals (without prefix ‘vol.’), with wavy underlining (bold type). Part number, only if separate parts of one volume are independently numbered. Page numbers, first and last, preceded by a colon (without prefix ‘p’). Thus: Situ, A. B. 1956. New Plonia species from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 9: 937-945- When reference is made to a separate book, give in this order: Author’s name; his initials; date of publication; title, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: Brown, X. Y. 1953. Marine faunas. 2nd ed. 2. London: Green. When reference is made to a paper forming a distinct part of another book, give: Name of author of paper, his initials; date of publication; title of paper; ‘In’, underlined; name of author of book; his initials; title of book, underlined; edition, if any; volume number, if any, in arabic numerals, with wavy underlining; pagination of paper; place of publication; name of publisher. Thus: SmitH, C. D. 1954. South African Plonias. In Brown, X. Y. Marine faunas. and ed. 3: 63-95. London: Green. SYNONYMY Arranged according to chronology of names. Published scientific names by which a species has been previously designated (subsequent to 1758) are listed in chronological order, with abbreviated bibliographic references to descriptions or citations following in chronological order after each name. Full references must be given at the end of the paper. Articles and recommendations of the International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International congress of zoology, London, July 1958, are to be observed (particularly articles 22 and 51). Examples: Plonia capensis Smith, 1954: 86, pl. 27, fig. 3. Green, 1955: 23, fig. 2. When transferred to another genus: Euplonia capensis (Smith) Brown, 1955: 259. When misidentified as another species: Plonia natalensis (non West), Jones, 1956: 18. When another species has been called by the same name: [non] Plonia capensis: Jones, 1957: 27 ( = natalensis West). INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA (SYNONYMS IN ITALICS) A Acanthocyclops, 515, 517 Acanthodes, 405 Acantholatris, 524, 525, 528, 543, 545 Aceratherium, 302, 364 Achiropsetta, 181, 184, 186 Acontiostoma, 206 Acryptolaria, 6, 7, 18 Adenota, 296, 297 Admetophoneus, 235 Aelurognathus, 413 Aepyceros, 294, 296, 298, 301 Aequorea, 434, 461, 484 Aethomys, 300 Afrochoerus, 297 Afrocyclops, 516 Afropisidium, 81 Agama, 420 Agastra, 4.72 Aglaophenia, 494, 495 Agyneta, 71 Alcelaphus, 293, 294, 295, 297, 298, 300, 301 Alepisaurus, 524, 544 Aleterix, 299 ?Alkmaria, 117 Allorchestes, 208 Alopecognathus, 124, 125, 126, 136, 143, 150, 155, 158, 162 Alopias, 280 Amage, 98, 99, 101, 102, 105, 112, 113 Ampharete, 98, 99, 101, 102, 105, 112, 114 Amphibolurus, 420 Amphicteis, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 105, 112, 113 Amphicteis, 113, 114 Amphiprion, 532 Amphisamytha, 101, 114 Amphisbetia, 6, 25, 491, 494, 495 Amphithoe, 208 Amphitrite, 113 Amythas, 98, 112, 117 Amythasides, 118 Anancus, 292, 293, 295, 296, 297, 315, 319 Anchitherium, 324 Aneugomphius, 414, 415 Anniella, 420 Anobothrus, 101, 102, 115 Antennella, 19, 492, 494, 495 Anteosaurus, 4.12 Antidorcas, 294, 298, 300, 301 Aonyx, 297, 299, 362 Aora, 208 Aphaneromma, 408 Archidiskodon, 280, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301, 315, 319 Arctocephalus, 280 Argobuccinum, 459 Ariosoma, 524, 538, 543, 545 Aryandes, 112, 117 Asabellides, 101, 112, 115 Asthenargus, 71 Atelodus, 293, 294 Auchenoplax, 99, 112, 118 Australopithecus, 295, 300 Auxis, 179 Avenantia, 235 Bathyergus, 301 Bathygobius, 190 Beatragus, 297, 363 Beryx, 528, 544 Bicorona, 433, 440, 484 Bidenichthys, 214 Bienotherium, 417 Bigois, 72 Bimeria, 434, 449 Bolosaurus, 410 Bos, 293 Bothrodendron, 268 Bougainvillea, 434, 449 Bovichthys, 524, 525, 543 Branchiosabella, 114 Brucella, 18 Bubalus, 293 Bularchus, 297 Bullia, 461 Bunolistriodon, 302 C Caesioperca, 525, 543 Calamphora, 39 Calicella, 477 Calotes, 420 Campanularia, 434, 471, 480, 484 Campanularia, 477, 4.78, 481, 483 Campanulina, 463 Campomma, 463 Cangoderces, 62, 63, 65, 73 Canis, 280, 293, 296, 297, 299, 300, 301 Caprella, 209 Capreolus, 294 Captorhinus, 409 Caracal, 2906 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA Carcharias, 280 Carcharinus, 268 Caulerpa, 211, 214 Cephalophus, 293, 301, 302, 362 Ceramius, 219 Ceratella, 44.4, 446 Ceratotherium, 279, 280, 295, 296, 297, 300, 301 Cerceris, 219 Cercopithecoides, 299, 300 Chaetodon, 529 Chalicotherium, 319 Chara, 92 Cheilodactylus, 529 Cheiracanthus, 405 Chilifer, 57 Chilodactylus, 529 Chlamydosaurus, 420 Chrysemys, 419 Chrysoblephus, 524 Chrysotricha, 300 Chthoniella, 74 Cichla, 531 Cistecephalus, 402, 414 Clava, 434, 452 Clibanarius, 459 Climatius, 405 Clinus, 215 Clytia, 434, 477, 484 Clytia, 472, 476 Cnidonema, 444 Cnidoscyphus, 52, 54 Condylus, 404 Congermuraena, 538 Connochaetes, 298, 300, 301, 302 Cordylus, 419 _ Coryne, 444. Coryphaena, 538, 543, 544, 545 Coryphopterus, 192 Crassatella, 453 Crateritheca, 6, 26 Creodonta, 302 Crocidura, 298 Crocodilus, 294, 295 Crocuta, 295, 296, 297, 299, 300, 301 Crossarchus, 299 Crossostoma, 113 Cryptolaria, 18 Cryptolaria, 7, 9 Cryptomys, 299, 300 Ctenogobius, 189 Cyclops, 516 Cycloptychius, 272 Cyclostigma, 268 Cynariognathus, 124, 144, 151, 155, 158, 164 Cynariops, 413 Cynictis, 300 Cynognathus, 400 Cypsilurus, 526, 544. D Damalavus, 293, 302, 362 Damaliscus, 280, 296, 297, 298, 300, 302 Daptocephalus, 412 Dasymys, 299 Dasyurus, 420 Decapterus, 524, 533, 543 Decennatherium, 363 Dehitella, 445 Deinotherium, 294, 295, 296, 297, 302, 315 Dendromus, 300 Desmodillus, 299 Deto, 196 Deuterosaurus, 233 Diadectes, 400, 409 Diademodon, 400, 415 Diaptomus, 520 Diarthrognathus, 416, 417 Dicerorhinus, 293, 362 Diceros, 295, 296, 297, 298, 300, 301 Dicoryne, 434, 451 Dictyocladium, 6, 28 Dicyclocoryne, 443 Dicynodon, 400, 412 Didelphis, 400, 420, 423 Didymophyllum, 268 Dimetrodon, 400, 411 Dinopithecus, 294, 363 Diogenes, 459 Diphasia, 6, 28 Doliosauriscus, 235 Dorcatherium, 302 Dynamena, 6, 29, 491, 494 Dynamena, 26, 27 Dynamenella, 196, 197 E Eccasaurus, 128 Echidna, 400, 420 ?Eclysippe, 118 Edops, 407 Elephantulus, 298, 299, 300 Elephas, 292, 293, 294, 315, 319 Eleutheria, 444. Emys, 419 Endothiodon, 126 Eogyrinus, 407 Epinephelus, 532, 543 Equus, 279, 280, 286, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 316, 322, 323, 328, 331, 334, 343, 344, 346, 379, 381, 388 Equus, 389 Eremias, 419 Euchambersia, 4.14. Eucheilota, 463 Eucyclops, 515, 516 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA Eucyclops, 517 Eudendrium, 427, 434, 454 Eudendrium, 451 Eudiaptomus, 516, 520 Eupagurus, 459 Eurychora, 57 Eurygnathohippus, 298, 349, 350, 389 Eurystheus, 208 Eusamytha, 118 Eusthenoptheron, 406 Euthecodon, 294 Euthynnus, 179 Exocoetus, 524, 544, 545 Exosphaeroma, 197 F Felis, 420, 423 Felix, 299 Filellum, 6, 10 Flabellipecten, 287 Fusus, 459 G Gaidropsarus, 525, 526, 543, 545 Gazella, 293, 294, 296, 297, 298, 300, 301, 302, 362 Georychus, 301 Giraffa, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301, 315 Glanosuchus, 122, 413 Glossogobius, 268 Glyphanostomum, 112, 118 Gnatho, 224 Gobius, 190 Gomphotherium, 297 Gorgon, 297 Gracilaria, 444 Grammomys, 299, 300 Griffinetta, 533 Grubianella, 112, 113 Gynutoclinus, 211, 215 Gypsorhychus, 300 H Haemilla, 58, 73, 74 Halecium, 434, 461, 464, 489, 494 Haltacris, 203 Halicore, 423 Halonia, 268 Haloporphyrus, 545 Halopteris, 493, 495 Harpethrix, 74 Hastimima, 268 Hebella, 6, 10, 55 Helicolenus, 524, 525, 543 Helladotherium, 314 Hemitragus, 294 Herpestes, 299, 301 Heterobranchus, 116 Hincksella, 6, 22 Hinia, 461 Hipparion, 273, 293, 294, 302, 316, 320, 321 Hippopotamus, 280, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301, 317, 319, 362, 363 Hipposaurus, 237 Hippotigris, 342, 389 Hippotragus, 294, 296, 297, 298, 302 Homo, 296, 297, 301, 319, 423 Homoioceras, 279, 280, 296, 297, 298, 301 Homotherium, 294, 295 Hyaena, 280, 293, 295, 299, 300, 301, 302, 362 Hyale, 207 Hydractinia, 434, 457 Hydractinia, 461 Hydrocorella, 434, 458 Hydrodendron, 490, 495 Hypania, 101, 112, 113 Hypaniola, 114 Hypsohipparion, 289, 332, 333, 334 337, 345: 346, 369, 377, 379, 387, 389, 392, 393 Hystrix, 293, 296, 299, 300, 301 I ais, 196, 199 Ictidosuchops, 414 Irana, 103, 106, 107 Ischnacanthus, 405 Ischyrocerus, 208 Isocladus, 196, 197, 200 Isolda, 98, 99, 100, 103, 106 Isurus, 280, 545 J Jaeropsis, 196, 200, 209 Jasus, 489 Jonkeria, 412 K Kannemeyeria, 412 Katsuwonus, 179 Keratocephalus, 252 Kingoria, 412 Knorria, 268 Kobus, 294, 296, 298, 362 Kollasia, 408 L Labidosaurus, 409 Labrichthys, 524, 543, 545 Lacerta, 419 Lafoea, 6, 9, 13, 18, 491, 494 Lamna, 280 Laomedea, 4.78, 480 Larifuga, 74’ Latris, 531, 543 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA Leggada, 299, 300 Lepas, 480 Lephthyphantes, 70, 73, 74 Lepidodendron, 268 Lepidopsetta, 181, 186, 187 Lepidostrobus, 268 Leptailurus, 299, 301 Leptocyclops, 517 Leptotrachelus, 413 Lepus, 299, 301, 423 Leuckartiara, 434, 449, 461 Libyhipparion, 287, 340, 341, 342, 348, 350, 389 Libypithecus, 294 Libytherium, 280, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301, 315, 340 Limnosceles, 409 Linyphia, 71 Lirius, 537 Lovenella, 434, 464 Lovenula, 516, 518 Loxodonta, 298, 300, 301, 315 Loxosceles, 61, 73, 74 Lunatoceras, 302 Lutra, 294 Lycaenodon, 413 Lycaon, 301 Lynx, 301 Lyriocephalus, 420 Lyrocephalus, 408 Lysippe, 105, 112, 114 Lysippides, 101, 112, 114 Lystrosaurus, 412 Lytocarpus, 10, 472, 494, 495 M Mabuia, 419 Macaca, 293, 362 Machairodus, 300 Macrocyclops, 515, 516 Makaira, 167 Makapania, 300, 301 Malacothrix, 299, 300 Mancopsetta, 181 Manis, 301 Mastodon, 286, 293, 294, 302, 315, 319, 364 Mastomys, 299, 300 Maurolicus, 524, 544 Medusa, 478 Megalichthyes, 407 Megalops, 268 Megalotragus, 298 Megantereon, 299, 300, 301 Melinna, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 106 Melinnampharete, 112, 117 Melinnexis, 103, 107 Melinnides, 107 Melinnoides, 99, 118 | Melinnopsides, 106, 107 Melinnopsis, 100, 106, 107 Melinnopsis, 107 Melita, 206, 209 Mellivora, 301 Menelikia, 294 Mentzichthys, 267, 270 Merona, 434, 452 mat enc 331, 338, 359, 360, 384, 386, 3 Merycopotamus, 286, 294, 314 Mesacanthus, 405 Mesochoerus, 295, 297, 298, 301 Mesocyclops, 515, 517 Mesocyclops, 517 Metadiaptomus, 516, 520 Metaschizotherium, 295, 296, 297, 300, 319 Metridiochoerus, 294, 295, 297 Microcyclops, 515, 517 Microsamytha, 101, 112, 117 Mnemeiosaurus, 235 Monishia, 190 Monocoryne, 433, 435, 484 Monostaechas, 19, 492 Morganucodon, 418 Moschosaurus, 265 Motella, 526, 527 Moyanus, 106 Mugga, 102, 112, 118 Munna, 196, 203 Mupus, 537 Mupus, 535; 544 Mus, 420 Mustela, 420 Myctophum, 524, 544 Myorycteropus, 302 Myosorex, 298, 299, 300 Myotis, 299 Myriothela, 433, 437, 484 Mystromys, 299, 300 N Nannippus, 331 Nassa, 459, 461 Nemertesia, 19 Neohipparion, 330, 337 Neosabellides, 100, 105, 112, 117 Nesotragus, 362 Nitella, 92 Notochoerus, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301 Notohipparion, 292, 330, 333, 347, 348, 389 Notopogon, 524, 528, 544 Notosollasia, 415 Nyanzachoerus, 295 O Obelia, 434, 483, 491, 494 Oeorpata, 106, 107 Okapia, 296, 297 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA Oligokyphus, 417 Omochoerus, 293, 294, 363 Ophioceps, 420 Ophiodes, 491 Ophiodes, 4.90 Ophiodissa, 490, 491 Orchestia, 207 Oreotragus, 280, 301 Orthopyxis, 472, 476 Orthostonyx, 297, 298 Orycteropus, 293, 296, 302 Oryx, 293, 294, 296, 297, 301, 363 Osteolepis, 4.06 Otomys, 301 Oudenodon, 400 lig Pabits, 98, 112, 118 Pagurus, 459 Paiwa, 114 Palaeogyrinus, 407 Palaeoloxodon, 280, 298, 315, 316, 317 Palaeotomys, 299, 300 Palaeotragus, 293, 302, 362 Palinurichthys, 535, 543, 544, 545 Panthera, 296, 297, 299, 300, 301 Papio, 299, 300 Paracyclops, 515, 517 Paradiaptomus, 516, 518 Paradiaptomus, 520 Parahippus, 331 Paramage, 100, 112, 116 Paramphicteis, 113 Paramoera, 206 Paranthropus, 297, 299 Paranthura, 197 Parapapio, 299, 300 Parascyphus, 491, 494, 495 Parawaldeckia, 205 Parawrightia, 452 Parhypania, 101, 112, 113 Paridotea, 196, 198, 209 Parotomys, 301 Pasythea, 31 Pavoclinus, 211, 212, 217 Pedetes, 296, 299 Pelea, 296, 302 Pelomys, 300 Pelorovis, 297 Pentaceros, 533, 544 Perca, 535 Perigonimus, 449 Petraites, 214 Phacochoerus, 294, 297, 298 Phanotea, 71, 73, 74 Phenacotragus, 297, 300, 301 Phialella, 464 Phialidium, 4.77, 478 Philanthus, 227 Pholidosteus, 406 Phrynocephalus, 420 Phthinosuchus, 235 Phylactotheca, 490 Phylica, 205 Phyllamphicteis, 100, 112, 114 Phyllocomus, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 112, 115 Physignatus, 420 Phyxelia, 73 Pisidium, 77 Plagiogeneion, 533, 544 Platystega, 408 Pliohippus, 322, 331, 359, 361 Plumularia, 493, 495 Podocoryne, 434, 461 Polyprion, 524, 532, 544 Pontogeneia, 206 Porcellio, 196, 205 Porrhomma, 71 Potamochoeroides, 300, 301 Potamochoerops, 299 Potamochoerus, 296, 297 Prionace, 524, 544, 545 Pristerodon, 399, 401, 402, 412, 413, 424 Pristerognathoides, 124, 125, 138, 144, 152, 155, 160 Pristerognathus, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 138, 145, 158, 160 Pristis, 268 Proamblysomus, 298, 299 Procavia, 299, 300 Procolophon, 400, 410 Pronolagus, 300 Propalaeochoerus, 302 Protopterus, 294. Psammogobius, 192 Pseudopentaceros, 533 Pseudosabellides, 115 Pseudoxenomystax, 540 Psilophyton, 268 Pterampharete, 100, 101, 116 Pterolysippe, 114. Ptomalestes, 124, 14.5, 153 Pultiphagonides, 297 Pycnotheca, 494, 495 R Raja, 497 Raphicerus, 300, 301 Redunca, 280, 293, 294, 296, 301 Rhabdomys, 299, 300 Rhadinichthys, 272 Rhinoceros, 314 Rhinolophus, 299 Rhinoptera, 280 Rhizorhagium, 434, 452 ?Rytocephalus, 113 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA S Stegolophodon, 277, 280, 315, 319 Stenothoe, 206 ?Sabella, 116 Stereotheca, 26, 27 Sabellides, 100, 101, 102, 103, 112, 116 Sternothaerus, 294 Sabellides, 106, 115, 116, 117 Stigmaria, 268 Salacia, 6, 31, 55, 492, 495 Stipidium, 359 Samotherium, 293, 302, 362 Strepsiceros, 294, 296, 297, 298, 301, 302 Samytha, 112, 116, 117 Struthio, 280, 293 Samytha, 118 Struthiocephalus, 251, 412 Samythella, 112, 118 ; Stylochoerus, 298 Samythopsis, 112, 116 Stylohipparion, 277, 286, 292, 293, 294, 295, Sarda, 179 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 315, 316, 333, Sarsia, 433, 444 334, 336, 337, 338, 340, 341, 342, 343, Scalopocynodon, 415 346, 347, 348, 350, 361, 387, 389, 390, Scandia, 6, 15 393 Schistocomus, 100, 101, 115 Styloniscus, 196, 203 Scomber, 524 | Suncus, 298, 299, 300 Scomberesox, 524, 544, 545 Suricata, 299 Scomberomorus, 179 Sylvicapra, 298 Scorpaena, 538, 543 Symplectoscyphus, 7, 51 Scotussa, 73 Syncerus, 294, 296, 298, 300, 301 Scylacosaurus, 400, 413 Syncoryne, 443 Scymnognathus, 413 Synodontis, 294 Scymnosaurus, 123, 124, 125, 126, 139, 146, Synthecium, 6, 24 153, 158, 160, 164 Synthecium, 22 Sebastes, 525 Syodon, 235 Sebastichthys, 524, 525, 543 Selaginites, 268 Fis Serengeticeros, 296, 297 Seriola, 524, 529, 532, 543, 544, 545 Tapinocephalus, 121, 237, 413 Seriolella, 524, 537 Tapinochoerus, 297, 298, 300, 301 Seriolella, 535 Tarsius, 423 Serranus, 532 Tatera, 299, 300 Sertularella, 6, 7> 345 55, 492, 494 Taurotragus, 294, 2096, 297; 298, 300, 301, Sertularella, 22, 51 317 Sertularia, 7, 49, 492, 494. Teleoceras, 302 Sertularia, 25, 26, 29, 37, 477, 478 Terebellides, 103 Seymoria, 408 Testudo, 280 Simopithecus, 296, 297, 300, 301, 321 Tetrodon, 541 Singularia, 268 Teutana, 68, 73, 74 Sivachoerus, 294 Thallomys, 299 Sivatherium, 279, 280, 294, 295, 298, 301 Thaumantias, 480 Smeringopus, 67, 73 Thaumantias, 478 Socarnoides, 205 Thecocarpus, 10 Solanderia, 434, 444 Therailurus, 299, 300 Sosane, 101, 112, 115 Therapon, 533 Sosanopsis, 101, 102, 112, 115 Theridion, 69, 73, 74 Sparus, 524 Theriodesmus, 126 Speleoderces, 62, 73, 74 Theriognathus, 415 Speleomontia, 74 Therioides, 124, 142, 148, 155 Speleosiro, 74 Thermocyclops, 515, 517, 518, 520 Spermophora, 65, 73, 74 Thrinaxodon, 415 Sphaeroides, 541, 543, 544, 545 Thryonomys, 296 Sphenodon, 399, 403, 404, 419 Thuiaria, 25 Spirophyton, 268 Thunnus, 179, 535, 544, 545 Squalus, 545 Thyroscyphus, 7, 52, 474, 476 Staurocladia, 433, 444 Thyroscyphus, 39, 491 Steatomys, 299, 300 Thyrsites, 524, 543, 544, 545 Stegodon, 280, 295, 315, 319 Titanophoneus, 235 INDEX TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA Tragelaphus, 294, 296, 297, 300, 301, 302, 317, 363 Tragocerus, 293, 294, 302 Trichoniscus, 203 Trichosurus, 4.20 Triconodon, 418 Tridentata, 50 Trigonephrus, 280 Trionyx, 294 Trioracodon, 418 Trirachodon, 415 Trochosaurus, 4.13 Troglohyphantes, 71 Trogonophis, 420 Tropiocolotes, 402, 404, 419 Tropocyclops, 515, 517 Tropodiaptomus, 516, 520 Tubularia, 427, 433, 434, 441 Tupinambis, 419 Turbo, 459 Turicius, 293 U Ulemosaurus, 235, 236 V Varanus, 419 Verticillina, 477 Vulpes, 299 xX Xenohystrix, 300 Xiphias, 178 Z Zinjanthropus, 319 Zinnosaurus, 121, 122, 125, 128, 130, 143, 148, 161, 165 Zonurus, 4.04 Zygophylax, 6, 15, 55 gi Never Pe eae Deen ene: Ne ie nn 4 y . FAY i gee i ‘ » tra 1h Fae cn Sew! \ hae oh 40 ey i a 4 ' i ‘ ao ah ‘ i : , < ) i i re, } Pe c ‘ ; 7 ~_ g Ae, 1 th % - y aie a . aw CZ ERNST MAYR LIBRARY “ulin 3 2044 1 Oe eer ee . BD i