Ht Raat tat Sp esate eatet stores e Si Ttilh EASES | Suitcase sas tstse3 eeuuiiaie RSET EEE ses ipiipentee seas tarp atoeetes prowiststerst-temtewentetrigiesest TEE a ry -Seesteastear tactee Set Saieaeeeensretz SERS Sesemersnaresie rae seers erate tees ae se g = = c; sane EHNA SuM TTT ine Sepa aera i tated pepessetereteisiesece LeiscsastsistesetHeees SaHeRiiee SHES EenTS spesthizstiscricertiserisismetcaiees Wai? ay —S es er ee ve = ily Wasi i | at ip Palsy : Henly Dina ‘Iqixe 94} dn oyeU 0} MBI}S JY} Ul SUIVIs pUv SOsSe.LS JO SUO}T SOp{soq suleis Joy}O JO sjeysnqg 00s puw UIOH JO Sjfeysnq 000‘9 PedInbosr JY “JIQIYXPT [BaN}[Nolsy S lInNossify JO MoIA [Bi9ues VW : * a. mi y ry ’ h rf é wy . . * A & : s F ; Bey - ¢ # La hy, ‘ ay fe ‘ . a nal ‘ * ow ow a ; ee ne = AN ‘i al 5 : Ld = mt re = DAG va ¥ } ny iy . +e ene i ie x te - P : fe ili | ; } Hl na j , ‘ , ie es : ’ : 7 ty tio J : ae — ¢ . er x ’. / - *t. ¥ fal 7 Vin ian : ‘ ; \ h 7 7 ~ . ne z } = : ‘S}Iqiyxe 0}e4s [eJoods [Te Jo ysouy oy} SeM SI ‘Us eke 2 R : UL “YUsitt Je9J 09 PUL JOJIUIBIP UT Yooy (Op ‘SUOISUDIIIC “000 ‘OTS soy ‘OOR[PGQ UIOD S.11Nn » DIELS 10; 5 LINOSsify 10HaTHI00'3 ¥ TTC has ngoanevasseny be > FEFVeeTessesesEtY FUROR EETL EEA Thirty-Seventh Annual Report OF THE MISSOURI peace Board of Agriculture A Record of the Work for the Year 1904 ALSO VALUABLE INFORMATION ON BREEDING AND FEEDING LIVE STOCK, IMPROVING THE FERTILITY OF TIE SOIL, GROWING CROPS, DAIRY- ING, AGRICULTURE AND LIVE STOCK STATISTICS, ETC. PUBLISHED- 1905: LiBRAR ‘ Y YORK tOTANICAL THE HUGH STEPHENS PRINTING COMPANY JEFFERSON CITY, MO. ay OFFICERS OF STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE I905. President—C. F. Afflick, Clarence. Vice-President—S. H. Prather, Tarkio. Secretary, Geo. B. Ellis, Columbia. Assistant Secretary—Miss Snowdon B. Willis, Columbia. Treasurer—H. H. Banks, Columbia. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. C. F. Afflick, Clarence. W. C. Howell, Ulman. Seeiee rather, Larkio: J. J. McNatt, McNatt. F. B. Mumford, Columbia. W. R. Wilkinson, St. Louis. J. J. Conrad, Marble Hill. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS. Governor of Missouri-——Jos. W. Folk. Superintendent of Schools—W. T. Carrington. Acting Dean Agricultural College, F. B. Mumford. CORPORATE MEMBERS. Cong. dist. Name. _ Residence. County. (Term expires July 20, 1906.) Dru Matles ally, THICK spc pice eens Clarence: =. nse Shelby NA ie Rahs ag 110s = aa, My i es Be Parkio.ce oes sens Atchison Joeestank C.. Haymanis < 2cce sn sae Houstonta.) Pettis 52.23 Wine Ce dowels 4. fen ween Rian oe ae Miller 15s. [OWN hs MeNatt on sie coca sss ee MeNatte fo wae McDonald (Term expires July 20, 1907.) . Ox Ohi, IDCErWester: 0 neteeer ates Bitlet ie. sea Bates Sr ested eeN AE OUES tote -ainib's wits ere aecea as Mexico. 5). eure Audrain FOP eee Nisetd, MareenSTelGer : .2 de a:aeree Clayton... 0 St. Louis fie. Norman). Colman. ;.o: s.s. St. Louis City.. Holland Bldg. I2....W.- R, Wilkinson.................ot. Louis City. -..212 Nye (Term expires July 20, 1905.) Ben J OMt VV pale tle AR a otek cee. Chillicothe... .<: Livingston So scllex, Matlandasweaet. J26 2e2 eon Richmond. =... .. Ray Beas Wa Le MS ryant: occ s eo hemes Independence. ...Jackson Ee eel | ODTAG. 3. {ence eee Marble Hill... ..Bollinger iA>> betd: J. Glessi | eee eae eens Charleston...... Mississippi Te We ANS De INCISON; 3: 5.u neta eee Lebanon... oi. Laclede OFFICERS OF STATE FAIR DIRECTORY. President—J. A. Potts, Mexico. Vice-President—John W. Hill, Chillicothe. Secretary—J. R. Rippey, Sedalia. Treasurer—Chas. E. Yeater, Sedalia. a ae EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE STATE FAIR DIRECTORY. J. A. Potts, Mexico. John W. Hiil, Chillicothe. | Alex. Maitland, Richmond. Norman J. Colman, St. Louis. John Deerwester, Butler. F. C. Hayman, Houstonia. A. T. Nelson, Lebanon. LIBR AR} STATE VETERINARIAN AND DEPUTIES. Wel uckey.) State, Velerinatian. .). cies. esas ose xe Springfield Eee Moore, Deputy State Veterinarian. in... 2 <<. = « Maryville Associate Organizations. IMPROVED LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—T. J. Wornall, Liberty. Vice-President—J. A. Funkhouser, Plattsburg. Vice-President (Horse Breeders’)—R. L. Harriman, Bunceton. Vice-President (Swine Breeders’)—L. E. Frost, Moberly. Vice-President (Sheep Breders’)—J. W. Boles, Auxvasse. Secretary—Geo. B. Ellis, Columbia. Treasurer—J. C. Hall, Rocheport. Members Executive Committee—W. P. Harned, Vermont; Benton Gabbert, Dearborn. MISSOURI CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—E. E. Laughlin, Rich Hill. Vice-President—M. F. Miller, Columbia. Vice-President—C. O. Raine, Canton. Vice-President—J. N. Price, Trenton. Vice-resident—P. E. Crabtree, Hannon. Vice-President—N. B. Graham, Fredericktown. Secretary and Treasurer—G. M. Tucker, Blodgett. MISSOURI STATE DAIRYjASSOCIATION. President—W. W. Marple, St. Joseph. First Vice-President—M. E. Moore, Cameron. Second Vice-President—M. V. Carroll, Sedalia. Secretary—C. H. Smalley, Kansas City. Treasurer—B. C. Settles, Palmyra. LET LER OF GRANSMIT DAL. State Board of Agriculture, Office of the Secretary, Columbia, Mo., March 17, 1905. To His Excellency, Joseph W. Folk, Governor of Missouri: Sir—I have the honor to transmit herewith a copy of the 37th an- nual report of the State Board of Agriculture for the year 1904. Missouri’s claim for being the first agricultural State of the Union has been demonstrated beyond question by the record of the winnings of the farmers made at the World’s Louisiana Purchase Exposition. By international juries Missouri has been awarded, in competition with every state and nation of any consequence in the world, a greater aggre- gate number of prizes on agriculture, horticulture, live stock and poultry products than any other state or nation. To Missouri was awarded 298 prizes in agriculture, 372 prizes in horticulture, 2 prizes in dairying, 790 prizes in live stock and 617 in poultry. To maintain this high position will command the best efforts of our farmers and demand the greatest possible encouragement of the State. That the Board of Agriculture is a prominent factor in maintaining the high standard of Missouri as an agricultural and live stock common- wealth is clearly shown by the fact that the publications of the Board are in greater demand than ever before. Respectfully, CEO] B.ELEIS; Secretary. TABLE OF CONTENTS: + Annual PEG OCU oe sisi as Hote tartans eter ovete a:b aiaks Ors a(irelo ms cnlelat ecole tolsbubcin Mie sais iniaslcie ene eUecehc tele terete AEOC 9-27 ASTiCuLMITa ands WUive ISCOCK sStAtIStLCSats ecm ete seme de seciiek ein elo.cisietelotaeatere Sonooec eeeeee B00-389 Butter and Cheese, Prizes awarded World’s Fair, St. Touis............s.cs«ecscces -.- 266-337 TUTTE CLD MED COM CINE ctaraterasove wine wid ole o' aie lo aisisisin isd mteeiaieiciaie ors ois isee ielesnteaniem ere tte elon eis ee eee meee «- 19-27 Improved dsive (Stock Breeders’ Associations... «aces ccs cnr coe oe cw ese ncenaeeeeermemeeine «. 122-198 101(0 (2S Se tS We Sanuor hose DBCOn Ana SMe OTemsodGh Nae caro season oararnd ese Latah Scodouosdaadcoo0e adaaade 101 itive Nrock-sPrizeg™ WOLrlLais Pain USt. MOM Sacco cnceviclsitee soiree st elaietesielneteeldelama teeters 243-263 Louisiana Purchase -Mxposition. cmc csc «cceisccewe ian ce cele vlelisio ohh celeseletetala Sejamrcreisla<'eiecioteleirarnte ite 199-265 MUSCSllAnteOUS ® PADELS: vec Joc sac acc errema see oer clae we goldtone Gtirrocchnanclocars sineecettal er ietane «2+ 338-300 Missouris Corn Growers) “ASSoclatiom se elelel = ojoieleiele folate! (elele\||einainlalo\s(e.ele/sl= 22 00 578 A Ei Olin} coosaouaateconeaact cdcoondenl|asconne 3 35 579 186, 18h IE nb deadoaecaps doconpieopo pede 15 00 580 Smith-Premier T. Co 7 80 581 NTISSOUPIS HALOS IVI ele atatot cisiareral=selnrcle/ole\v/ela\| foreinlefole.alele 2 99 10 582 (ep Jes) LOUIE Ae eehankosdensoonecd ob bie leate:|tere aisle: syoiatereiels 50 00 “tS Sado al lsbopAnnoseer To requisition ..............eeeeeseee cece eee eeees JN oye OS ae 583 Byi GeoweBs, Dllisoeeertesscumcrse ence es ons: Vee eee ee ats 50 00 Sen On seis 584 BaALnes-Crospy, © | COmerere ae tecciicselemisetets [isis tessielavserorfe | 37 05 Se citaros. 585 | SECHEE BinSijac tatters Socios icesteicielelets' | sisielascie'slainvateto 3 81 US Oe 586 Sone UTS e sec co cisote ee cs eaters srstviajeiciere sol] diaretelelssesecs cts 11 20 Oa A Ae 587 INFKT, Dee \ Coscadonbepanosapacssdnob) |jboocoDedsocc 23 58 2 eascec | 588 Smith-Premier Typewriter Co..........|.........005 8 00 oe TO Saoe pal | 589 MAISSON TIS Latest nie sects erect aieicie vale! feo mictercieleveretete 95 56 ny Daa [aime icin: 1G): THETTOS NAS Sonn pebecoeos s0uneoosana°eaD0S 50000 200 00 Lah faa aoe 590 IBV? inne H CMO Ny (COaeacasononococosonedas5 bl loveogaanedes 17 40 OT een 591 (Gkeo. 18h) II” GassoooceddoconasospponadscuD looncoudarnes 50 00 2 G6 cecal nese enenenes Me) eCmietinGn geesoooagcsdoatdaoonooBaccocmooqocee 200 00 mune... os. 592 Tye GEO es mld Shaner terteteeaieievereercettalololeticiarsielel [olaleiatsls]oistasiehs 50 00 nlyoe Vc: 593 (Gis Sm DI ae pepeanedocdsacsbeeceoaned pe ostecnos u 50 00 Os Aloe epee 594 WES Uso G3, WE UBS Ron doaaadansococeddapsugbllooaodopec0se 4 00 ore aaa bey eee 595 IgE ORO shy (COsesAsoansogonodusoecdooS Ippocaecenare 16 50 _ Dats 596 Vn Bb, 18 Rage iG oo dedanac copadousbocDaNOONOe | HBoowtgcnso6 3 GF Us gonnd 597 Missouri Statesman ..........-2--eeseeee lessees AoBo 32 50 /\Wis5 Abaaeae 598 Geo. B. Bllis.........-...ceeesseeeeeeeeree soadconsosse 50 00 % ictcteve:o)s 599 Smith-Premier Typewriter Co..........]...+.----+.- 4 8 * arctaceys 600 1S) BAB Mey ma Sh RecosenndaooocodudseadocoOee | Peo dueCEnS 3 15 00 Re te 22 win 601 Sh WEL) NDT Stik GraaaonaecueoadenobbeaLedooos locopgabuacde 65 00 Weer cetel| stetore aisro Saisate gM TEC UI SUG] OM ate ete vatotevel crete etere laleie aie sieinlelclelefeless/=(el=ieis/ol- | 500 00 Sep (aes 602 Vale (kas 18% IBID s wodbsceadaoddascbcacasecadob|lodacoucudocs | 50 00 i, Oseeees 603 American) HXpress CO ms... ce --a creel |\ecieaeseeseicie 46 77 OS [eed ante ek atcts AMO). seGfejnbtsilinWolal- sGoodieacooqonhoonn sus oncD deo s000NN0S 500 00 Oct. 1...... | 604 Biya GOES Re ie eA eS ea 10 00 “Say Sere A 605 (ENS 16s OIG pea mendaus cudeoondncoocodasDel lode coopuarac 50 00 Co gai ete 606 Missouri Statesman ........ sce soodedon | |Saccasnnacse 2 00 pe eis cicte 607 (CYeGy 115) OME ae bocosdaendesagnedocagos0a90|looncacadsane 500 00 SS alecotg S 608 SORT TMI NG. ns se oiee son cre crete late lsraisiavaisistaietel| ereisreraieietelevarets 44 80 INOW: dees. 609 Sh G8 iO) lian Ss adoogpesupoacooscatonoscdodol |aooococsndc. 13 00 Og ite ae 610 (GiVO. 9835. IHW: odocioasegoseoosapucnasoouoaodlloduessonanso 50 00 bi irs [eee 611 LOL eis il Ser DILL ae ona ure nanece tO Bane oni | tale ctaeraialetots | 1,000 00 pe es cats 612 By Re Ammerman:..ceccemesstes vals Tere dicate [leteletalersteretetalore 8 23 ulBS see 613 Se (ls Apilehis| oan soooonadaocssoospobedoooodl Inposagasooge 63 60 Sl retemte is cteretsier vetscorete ANG) FeO OSHC A Goren goncoosodoonAcocdoedcsaobeoucase 2,000 00 10, 2xor en Ie Soe 614 HEN? (EGO a. UMM ec caosonecnnodoaceconsoceocaollopocauaHaocs 50 00 ert [Aare 615 GOODIES UTS Ae rracerare ciayeteronie aranictatetola c alaiereie cial llatefetesiale mieie ole 1,000 00 * Wises ehte 616 Pbpale ise binl this nene aes senmasaencpmoeemenas Babe aperirece 97 20 7 A crecdollsagensaceace MOM ECU ST OMe Meee ee ee RE eta eee 1,000 00 a ee [eeisisisicelaparest SV MID AENTL COT e syeaiere arora nistersaccorayere et enanese blo sraleletere ctactel los crete reaciote 1, 002 83 | $5,792 18 $5, 792 18 22 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. SECRETARY’S ACCOUNT. Date. cee No. Name. | Dr. | Cr. D . b PCr Ure ciiclcellicts duc aeaie cote PO AN RTANICE Ka dele ciate sie’ ste ntainid'celo/s\cresaletelemissicieaciis seers 688 05 poe) Grae nior 1 Sales) Gres RITIEES Vi cracicit sin hin «cine ofpioalaicidice cine taisiets : AAaoREC eter by Baer or RPS Lie TROIS: iste a alates wine. SECRETARY’S ACCOUNT—Continued. Date. Check No. Name. | Dr. | Cr. Oi Please | Spee ...| To warrant No. 607 on Farmers’ Inst. Fund.. Wo eo aeeee 66 Bye 5 WiaEG) Kenyans pees cles F 42 15 2 67 R. M. Washburn. 21 72 OCERNS2 one 68 Da em KInN'shts eee s 3 60 oY Saar 69 GEA BWV BLOTS See cee nei neh oan cis na acne lnomenitecee 50 00 Smee LOS 5s. c-2 70 De bee BiG eee: cre ae eter raise cence cael] Sime ncroe inset 8 00 CU Pa 71 RASNE SOV ASHI tra deme ots cians occ ct lowe | teenies a 20 70 oO as Bear 72 HR NMI ONG eae ce tisoctce tee see camels [eratercrelsteveraretve 23 45 “BT Eee 73 Vee ASHI waeec cee hice m cnesecs sa cts [petaecon eee 8 30 peal onccstere 74 PAW AIG SIAN Sere eis aes cinicta we aioisis.c wiclemtoas| ceimeo a oxen 50 00 Wear tiene 15 GAPWHP WV AICODS seen sparen oe ste nee occ cies call ete oteie leet 50 00 Agee) wrersiciee 76 Sige Hive MODE aces ace comico nivien cso testdail teeta wens 12 80 LA aa 77 Ges “RUCKER saniceraeisie coerce oes cae ote lee cn ieee 40 42 See OO wctexters 78 Hae NCVERe aunts eter ictes cca uscanene etre cee | tae ecem ons 1 50 be Al anersiers 79 Hs CEMA OR Se Atte tee he mee caleptlsac acetone | caoeen ae aeee 21 85 ie Sil aeeaas 80 Soe Cini se a cen scrren ie won satis ois ncee toll wae cai coe 3 53 Naval cere 2 se eS = LOM WALLANE NO Gon wk NOUN Ge ce eicntcneace ae 1.000 00 ae ln Ha 81 BYORte Meo WAS DUE wees cote ie ote crore caleval ll teinistore stacePbioss 47 11 oi 82 Sep Moy Ste Galante < asec ccraccmeesiece chica aante cet csicas 57 92 ae 83 GEAWiae WWIRTOES? 3 oo.5S cciciciencstsiciee eintow ora Ge sities [Neale stowisemrere 100 25 os 84 SSM lkinisste sere ee eon ae at Lene aes eee ee 14 00 “ cn 85 OPP MIEV ORs centers pekelne Baa cya trans es oereetaals [cea 92 93 ee ne 86 MESH PNA Orse cutee sts occas cect S 6 20 see 87 eG WinNT tten sce ee ce celeen alte 56 70 as 88 TS WWE OR INIT Serres sist ceis/nerel antase/s otsiovels eainel| @etaenieswenee 156 62 «6 89 GMs URTCKErS Seca scntesreetcde tole cles sted eects mee 31 75 “ 90 Shannonl Moun ty Oye cee acecciecnice vec cieee | eet clare, ciote-aee 25 00 a 91 Re NSS NASH DUTT Ec aeiceovs cctine sw enanisat|saeceseiecees 26 43 sf 92 See BRING neccck eaters econ tein newts Sieg Sloane ceeeeeute 6 50 Dye al | (Cone eeee se To warrant 615 on Farmers’ Inst. Fund....... | 1,000 00 aS Aa 3 By, Mero: eeninninehaml™. caterer cath cwsca coos sil ponone ene sme 1 85 "pe AR one 94 DD Wear sci MPs votssaists femmes aleisiotoe as: |!s'siayarere.e' e.stale 246 70 CON Oe 95 NOSE DN WArG ORGIES ante ccinne cs osicce col eater ctdonenls 1417 See Olseceoe 96 Geo. SB ra Wilisiee ius secaic sonites sovaeteaaelloscisesaences 21 28 pee Siltns Se 97 Dry nn MONT OOY veces cae crocs coine 6 cu, cose little cies cwierds 2 00 02 aes 98 ea SLOTS Sete eceeavive sieotelare orale Sorel avelotevarcill eieavarereie aarnete 2 00 OP ee 99 Jeg Cea WCLOMs cash csincc tate canoes ce ees | oesrina’S eines 15 20 Seal ear sistas 100 CEMIRE A CLOSD Yao sinc Selene oveiele ci Sovsiaistewiee lla ae te weirs eters 18 04 perms crea stetcrell Mraaicic «1s wle(sieve Balance ceca wecsswanctecass cceeeaash fejebes [Beteeieaceee 1,258 71 ——S=—= eee $4,001 65 $4,001 65 | 24 | MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. OFFICE EXPENSE FUND. Date War. No. Name. Dr \ Cr | I Do shalance fcc. ccs epennacacactinotioccteeseannee $138 37 BY Je We. Straws... scitascecoduacececner tne eae $1 75 De weds SBMS Fo: cae wcniens ove aeaseeee de en coe ee eee ee eee | 15 85 Snowdon Wallis) gh, Sam a ecegennd q ni Macys ava if ek Ses cca a | ah ely be y > MSS “>: Saaangag Ears &% to 9 in circumference near butts, smooth, cobs very lavge especially near butts, white in color, kernels shallow and COB PIPE CORN, grown in Franklin Co., Mo. rather wide. This corn is raised especially for the cobs which are used in the manufacture of pipes. 73 CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. i Reeeoiots Depa ictus 4 oe +H Petre ehh CEL En ? REPREL eo #6 ne barat ior ease ‘ pitts ZOE ESRB EGS OL OGLE: Ane Ohit : pee au treeeceagtct Hitt we CE ERp vba rd heed Pie C775 * See Atta" t eehity mmea dec / GES BITE aL + Der StiFinaqaob DSHODIDEE SR Te CM COEOE CORRS CROCE Oto DEDLAE Bed a EN tengre care Hi edd ss) Srey HERR ADIOS: or 5 HEE CERES aa' nonsnvter? PHAN ene shen eee hah kd since wie, aed a piste ceorticregs maura rit nace CCCEETER DRE cae ag Meare pp ame eg area id ‘ ee Fars a rich golden Inclined to be rough. Grown by 1. W. McFarland, Cooper Co., Mo. Rather inclined to spread at top, and CARTNER CORN. yellow, 7% to 7% inches long, 714to 7% inches Cobs smal!, deep red color. ference. in ecireum Kernels very deep. Cooper county by John Cartner about in ted ina o as) 1S corn was or: h eorn won a gold medal at the World’s Fair, uf to be loose on the cob. At the St. Louis. This State Corn Show in 1994, it made a higher per cent of shelled corn than any other variety exhibited, testing 90.3 per cent shelled corn. ago. forty years Mr. R. B. Johnston of Cooper county reports a yield in 1904 on one acre of 80 bushels and 25 pounds, which is an excellent yield for ze will no doubt make in sl ereased somewhat i in is um uplands This corn so unfavorable a season. ils. sol i an excellent variety for med MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. 74 SAMPLE EARS EXHIBITED AT STATE CORN SHOW—CROP I904. DRE ee nt Pc uaeanbensicn tien Re ase Ds fog Gao x TT aN nies eRe me a ara ete “( i ois at ronvOOB, mnegan® OS Rars 9 to 9% Mo. cobs deep red Rockport, Sly, Geo. H. inclined to be rough ite, grown by es Wh arl h in circumferen St. Cc ROW: TOP inches long, medium size, ’ ce, % Tf ano) ff kernels fair de pth. St. Charles, Mo. lackemeier, Be E. arles White, grown by J. Ch St. OM ROW: to 9 inches long, 6% to 7 inches in circumference, inclined to be smooth, cobs deep red, medium size, kernels fair depth, Borer Kars 814 CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. ra DISCUSSION OF SCORE CARD. Dr. G. M. Tucker —The proportion of corn to cob is something that has very little relation, it has been found, to the actual production, so far as yield per acre is concerned, that is, we can have a small cob with a large amount of grain relatively on it, and that kind of a cob tnay produce very small ears, or its other characteristics be such that it does not produce a big yield per acre. Some of the new score cards, in place of the proportion of corn to cob, call for the actual weight of the grain, the actual weight of the grain being much better indication of the productivity of the corn than the length or circumference of the ear. It is the weight of the grain that we take in computing the yield per acre, and the weight of the grain on the ear multiplied by the number of ears in the field will give that yield. The amount of grain on the ear is the thing that we are after and counts more than anything else in profit. The score card, while it does not in any of its points actually bear upon the productivity of the corn, yet it does have an important bearing upon bringing before the producer little points found in the corn which so to make up corn and which have a special bearing in producing a high bred corn and corn which has character, so that before big yields can be intelligently produced the score card must be studied closely and these points brought out by studying the ear. The points which are actually useful to the producer—the grower of corn—are character. By character I mean just the general appear- ance, the conformation, I may say, of the ear which shows breeding; then weight of the grain; the commercial grade—which, of course is important; and the yield per acre. These four points are the ones which have a direct bearing upon the interests of the corn grower. In selecting my seed corn last spring I judged it by the score card. I had no other means. That was the teaching that I had had, that the score card was something by which I could judge my corn, and in computing the value of each ear as a breeding ear I based my judg- ment by comparing each ear with the score card and in planting my breeding plats I put my best ear—or the one I thought ought to pro- duce the largest yield, judging from the appearance of the ear—in the center of the plat and graded on either side toward the edges, so I had the best ear in the middle and the poorest ears on either side. Mr. Ellis —What were the results? Dr. Tucker —The results were quite peculiar. My best ear which was numbered 34, was right in the middle of the plat; it gave a yield 76 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. of 105 bushels per acre which was very good. It was a fairly good sized ear—g.8 inches long and had a weight of 14% ounces of grain. The per cent of grain to cob was 91, which was very high for Boone County White. That was exceptionally high, and I had an idea that I had a very fine ear of corn, and it produced 105 bushels per acre. But let me show you where my best ear was: it was the second one from the outside edge. That was my most productive ear, the one that gave the largest yield per acre, and it was one that I had considered to be about the poorest ear in the lot. It gave a yield of 156.3 bushels per acre. It was a large ear, having rather small per cent of grains on it, but it had a power of reproduction which cannot be found out by the score card. The weight of the grain on that ear was one pound. , Mr. King.—Was there any difference in the care given it? Dr. Tucker—None. We planted one row after the other, taking the same care. Mr. King.—You said this was next to the last row. What of the last row? Dr. Tucker.—The ear on the last row on that side made 144 bushels per acre. That was more than my best ear., Mr. Ellis—Was there any difference in the soil? Dr. Tucker.—There was no difference that I could discover. It was in the midst of a one hundred acre field. Mr. Boles—How do you account for the fact that your good ear did not make any more? Dr. Tucker.—It was only good looking. It did not have good blood in it. Dr. Huston—What kind of corn was it? Dr. Tucker.—Boone County White. Dr. Huston.—Was there any relation between the position of your tiles from drains to this plat that could influence it? Dr. ‘Tucker.—I think not as the large yielding ears were scattered throughout the plat, not all being on one side. Dr. Huston.—It was symmetrical so far as the plat was concerned? Dr. Tucker.—Yes, and the yields varied the other way as well. Mr. Boles.—Then you never know the best ear until you try it? Dr. Tucker.—I did not then know because I bought the seed. In the future I will select the seed from the actual performance and not from the score card. It is all right on the show table to compare ex- hibits. I do not see that it has value anywhere else except as an aid in studying corn. CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. oa Mr. King—Of two equal scoring exhibits the one with the best pedigree is the one to plant? Dr. Tucker.—Yes, a pedigree based on performance and not on the score card—a pedigree based on the actual yield in the field. I had a photograph of some of the ears that I bred from last year. I photographed all of them so as to get an idea of how they would re- produce themselves in shape and appearance. Mr. -—What was the lowest yield per acre? Dr. Tucker.—4o bushels. They ranged from 40 to 156 bushels per acre. alvin. ——Did you plant by tier or by row? Dr. Tucker.——By row. I did not plant all of the corn on the ear, but irom the same place on the ear. Whatever I used I planted from the whoie length of the row on the ear. Mr. ——Was the ear that produced 40 bushels apparently as good as the others? Dr. Tucker—No, not quite so good. It was a smaller ear than some of the others. I had placed it next to the last. The second best ear produced 144% bushels to the acre. That ear weighed 18 ounces, its per cent of grain was only 81 and we are taught that is very low. The per cent of grain for Boone County White should be 86. This one was way below the standard, and yet the actual amount of grain on that ear was 1444 ounces. It lacked only an ounce and a half of putting a pound of grain on that ear. The ear that produced only 40 bushels to the acre had on it only 11% ounces to the ear. So there seems to be in gen- eral some relation between the actual amount of grain in weight on an ear and the total yield per acre of grain. The ear that gave the small- est yield was a pretty good ear according to the score card. I placed it as No. 17 in my plat, and the one which gave the largest yield I placed as No. 24. These yields were apparent even in the gathering—in the size of ears themselves. Mr. Reed.—Where was the seed raised that you planted? Dr, Tucker.—In Illinois. Mr. Reed.—Was the seed corn pollinated by corn in the same patch or by corn in that neighborhood? Dr. Tucker.—It was all the same kind of seed, the Boone County White, and this breeding plat was entirely surrounded by the same variety. Mr. ——On what kind of soil? Dr. Tucker.—Drained, re-claimed swamp lands near Blodgett, Scott county. , 78 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Dr. Huston.—Not peat lands are they? Dr. Tucker.—Yes, rather peaty. Dr. Huston.—Enough to burn? Dr. Tucker—I do not know. I should think not. There is quite a little sand mixed in with it. Mr. .—Do you ever investigate whether the quantity of yield per acre had anything to do with the percent of starch or protein in the corn? | Dr. Tucker—No. There is a question that I would like very much to have discussed and on which I would like to have the opinions of those who have formed any, and that is the advisability of breeding corn ior a high per cent of protein, to be placed on the market or used by the feeders. Is it profitable for a man who has the ground to grow corn which requires a large amount of nitrogen to augment the natural ten- dency of corn to grow protein or is it better to grow a kind of corn that will produce oil and grow alfalfa, cow peas, clovers or some of the leguminous plants and get his nitrogen from the air rather than from the soil? Mr. the starch? Does not the flinty corn outweigh the other? Dr. Tucker.—Yes, the flinty corn outweighs the other. There are two kinds of starch, horny and flaky. Weighed per grain or ear, the flinty corn would produce a little heavier weight, that is the struck half —Does not the protein in the corn weigh heavier than bushel of the flinty corn would weigh heavier than a struck half bushel of the rough corn, but where weighed per acre, we get the greater yield from the rough corn, we are finding down in Scott county. There was some complaint about the Boone County White corn be- cause it was sort of chaffy or light weight, a struck half bushel weigh- ing only 27 pounds, while the more flinty corn would weigh 29 pounds, but they did not take into account how much area they had to go over in their land to get that half bushel. One ear of the chaffy corn would produce more than one ear of the flinty corn because the kernel was so much deeper. Mr. Gabbert.—I prefer the dent corn always to feed to cattle com- pared with the flinty corn, unless you grind the latter. Col. Waters—In my judgment it would be unwise for the farmer to breed for a high per cent of protein because he will have enough to do to increase the actual yield, disregarding the protein and to raise this protein in other crops. I totally disregard the idea in farm practice of endeavoring to develop especially high protein corn. Put all your. emphasis on increase in yield, because we can go forward in the develop- CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 79 ment of a single particular much better than we can carry forward two or more particulars. Dr. Huston.—So far as you know does the market distinguish be- tween high protein corn and high starch corn? Dr. Tuckeft.—I have not found one that does in those terms. Of course there is the hominy market. Dr. Huston—The corn for the hominy market is a white, flinty corn, and has as a basis the Johnson County White. Outside of the hominy district, so far as I know, there is no great market for this special kind of corn, but outside of that district there ought to be a market for the high-starch corn, and hominy mill people and the starch people ought to want a corn with a relatively high oil because it is a very important factor, particularly in the starch factories. But whether they are willing to pay for it is another matter. There is another kind of corn that from the farmer’s standpoint seems to be very profitable and easy on the land, and that is a corn with cob that will carry five pounds or more of water to the bushel. This is the type of corn they like to sell to the elevator man, and have been very successful in doing so. Five pounds of water to seventy pounds of corn is a pretty fair margin, and I know farmers who esteem this type of corn very highly, combined, however, with a very high yield. Mr. Gabbert.—I prefer that kind both for yield and feeding value. Mr. —Why does Mr. Gabbert prefer a soft ear for feeding? Mr. Gabbert—It will grind smoother. In feeding whole ears to beef cattle they will thrive faster on softer than on flinty corn. Dr. Huston.—As far as the hominy corn goes, the feeding tests on hogs have shown no difference, practically, between white hominy corn and the ordinary yellow corn of the corresponding neighborhoods. Dr. Tucker.—It seems to me, without the data to go by, that a man is treating his farm better and liable to get better results from feeding the kind of carn which does not have a tendency to high protein power than one that does. I want to know whether that is right or not. Mr. Gabbert.—Protein is pretty high when you buy it, but it does not cost much in legumes. Dr. Huston.—Don’t you think it possible to develop -a less flinty corn with a high protein? : Dr. Tucker.—The point I had in mind was in producing a high protein you are using a large quantity of nitrogen which is difficult to get in the corn. Putting the protein there is an expensive operation, as it impoverishes the soil of that expensive element. Dr. Huston.—If you feed it you can get it 80 per cent easier. 80 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Dr. Tucker—If you grow it in a legume, so much the better. Mr. ail the time. .—The tendency of the protein corn is to become starchy Dr. Tucker.—Yes, it has to be bred close to keep up the protein content all the time. It has to be selected for that purpose or it will run back again to the usual kind. Mr. —Is it profitable to grind corn and cob together? Mr. Gabbert.—Yes. Mr. —It is said both cattle and hogs feed better on yellow corn than white. Dr. Tucker——You cannot pin any. quality to color. The value of the corn depends on where and how it is grown. Mr. -—Do you select a small or large cob? Dr. Tucker.—Very little depends upon the size of the cob. A great many have complained about the Boone County White corn because of the large cob, but a large cob has more grain. The larger the cob, within certain limits, the larger the amount of grain. Mr. Boles.—The large cob matures slower. Dr. Tucker—Yes, and takes a later growing season. Col. Waters.—It exhausts the land, more. Dr. Tucker.—Only because it grows a bigger yield. Mr. Erwin.—Did you ever notice which will raise more bushels, on poor land, the large or the small variety? Dr. Tucker.—A comparatively, small-ear variety will do better on thin land than the large ear. Mr. Erwin.—That is my experience. Dr. Tucker.—About the capping over: Whether the corn growing over the tip of the cob has anything to do with the breeding quality or not, is another question. I would just as soon plant an ear that is not as one that is fully capped over. I would just as soon breed from it. I do not think data enough has been taken to know which does the best. Actual performance is better than such a minor point as that. Another point in the score card is the length of the ear. The standards adopted by the Illinois association called for a definite length of ear. The Boone County White ears that we planted ranged from 8 to 954 inches, but in the crop I gathered from that there were many ears which were I0 inches in length and over. I have some of them here. : Mr. ——Where did the score card fellows get their standard? Dr. Tucker—From the standard in that community. When you grow a corn on different soil, you must have a different standard. You CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION. 81 must take into consideration the climatic and soil conditions under which that corn was grown. Dr. Huston—What do you think of the 14-inch ears shown in the Missouri exhibit? Is there any object in producing that particular type of corn? Dr. Tucker—I do not know. They are usually so slender, the cob and the ears equally small. A cylinder like that has less corn on it than a thick one. I go by weight of grain, as we judge the race horse by the speed and the dairy cow by her butter performance, we measure the corn by its productiveness. Mr. Mumford—How important is it that an ear should be cylin- drical? What facts have we to prove that a cylindrical ear is better than a deeper ear? Dr. Tucker—The greatest point is the uniformity of the kernel. As an ear tapers, the kernels will grow smaller or be irregular. Mr. —————Unless the cob tapers relatively. Dr. Tucker—Even then there will be irregularity if the rows drop out and that means a possibility of not getting a uniform stand in drop- ping with the planter. So far as actual yield is concerned, I do not know that there is much difference. I do not know why there is not the same chance of the cob tapering as the ear does. Mr. Gabbert—They are getting graders to grade the seed, it would be better if a man buy seed corn that has been run through the grader. Dr. Huston—Don’t you think it advisable to always buy seed corn on the ear? Dr. Tucker—Yes. Mr. Boles—Why ? Dr. Tucker—Because one can see the size of the ear he is getting. The shape does not make so much difference. You can get just as good looking grains from any of the low grade ears where the ear is too short or not big enough. But if the farmer buys his seed corn in the ear he sees what he is getting and the probabilities are that he will get better ears. If he buys the shelled corn he would not know the difference, the kernels of the small ear look as well as the kernels of the big one. Mr. Carroll—When will Missouri be able to get over that sneer about the score card? Dr. Tucker—When all our farmers breed ears that will produce 156 bushels to the acre. Of course the score card will have to be used or at least those points which the score card brings out will have to be studied in improving corn because there is, of course, undoubtedly some relation. A-6 82 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Mr. ————Don't you think that farmers should study to know their type of soil in studying the type of corn to plant? Dr. Tucker—Within certain limits. Of course there are different types of soil and corn becomes adapted to a certain type, and should not be changed abruptly to a different type of soil. The Boone County White is adapted to a fertile soil and when put on a clay hill, it probably would not produce as well as some other variety. THE QUERY BOX. (Conducted by Prof. F. B. Mumford.) Q. Will it do to cultivate corn aiter it gets too large for the two- horse cultivator? Mr. Laughlin—Yes sir, for the reason that the corn does not really begin to make its growth until brace-roots are formed. The object of cultivation largely is to get rid of the weeds and other grasses that grow around them and which would take up the nutrition that the corn plants should have. Prof. Mumford—What kind of cultivation ought we to give? Mr. Erwin—Just as shallow as it is possible and disturb as few of the roots as possible. Prof. Mumford—What is shallow cultivation and what is deep cultivation? Prof. Miller—Usually shallow cultivation runs about 2 1-2 inches on upland. On some soils, it might be considered that 3 or 3 1-2 inches would be shallow. It depends upon the soil largely, but 2 to 2 1-2 inches would be pretty shallow cultivation. With very wide shoveled culti- vators that would be out of the question, but with fine toothed instru- ments, it should be about 2 I-2 inches. Q. Will white corn yield more per acre than yellow corn? Prof. Mumford—The yield of corn does not depend upon color. Q. Is there any virtue in the cob? If not, what is gained by grinding it? Prof. Forbes—Grinding the cob with the meal is of benefit only in feeding steers. It is of no benefit in the feeding of hogs. We grind the cob with the meal, not because of any very great amount of nutriment that it contains, but in order to lighten up the meal. If fed to a hog, it is a detriment to the animal. For steer feeding, if corn is worth 30 cents per bushel, we are adding 7 1-2 cents worth to it by grinding and if we can grind for 7 1-2 cents a bushel, it is worth it, but if not, it is not. CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 83 Prof. Mumford—‘here is very little nutriment in the cob, It is sometimes an advantage to lessen the ration, it promotes digestion, averages real nutrition in the corn meal better. It would probably be just as efficient, if not more, to mix the corn meal with chaff. My experience in grinding corn and cob meal is if you grind the cok fine enough so that it is finished as a feed, it will cost more than it is worth. It is of no advantage to feed cob the way it is ordinarily ground in large pieces. However, where the experiment stations have carefully investigated this matter and have ground the cob fine enough, it is true that a pound of corn and cob meal has been as valuable as a pound of pure corn meal and we might assume that it is, when mixed in that proportion, of the same value as a pound of corn meal, but you must always carry with that the idea that it must be ground fine, and there’s the rub. Q. Is the corn worm or its fungus injurious to live stock that is fed on such corn? Prof. Mumford—That is a question that has agitated a good many men in the last few years. Mr. Gabbert—It is not the worm, it is the dust that injures the horses more than cattle. ? Prof. Mumford—It seems to be the general impression that there is some injury following the feeding of such corn to animals. Whether from insects or dust, it is not as good corn as corn not worm-eaten. Q. Is it better to feed cotton seed meal to beef cattle in con- nection with corn? Prof. Mumford—We have fed cotton seed meal a little to beef cattle at the Experiment Station for seven years, and it has been our experience in almost all of these experiments that when corn is worth 50 cents a bushel and cotton seed meal is worth $22 to $24 a ton that it does pay to feed cotton seed meal. There are two things that we aim at in feeding cattle, we aim to finish them to a point where they will satisfy the demands of the market and to make the gain necessary to produce that finish at the smallest possible cost. If you consider only the increased gain from a given amount of grain, it does not always pay to feed the cotton seed meal. A hundred pounds of corn fed on blue grass pastures will produce the gain more cheaply than the corn and cotton seed meal can but the cotton seed meal will fit them for sale very quickly. It sometimes pays to feed a small amount of corn and cotton, seed meal when it would not pay to feed a large amount. Q. Should each farmer have a corn breeding plat next year? 84 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Prof. Mumford—That was threshed out pretty well today and some decided that he should while others decided that he should not, and my opinion is that it will not help matters for us to continue the dis- cussion on that subject here. It is a question in my mind. Every man should not be a breeder of purebred cattle or horses and it is a question in my mind if every farmer should try to breed pedigreed corn. It is a nice theory and it is a nice business, so far as that is concerned, but the average farmer is concerned with making money and if every farmer was a breeder of corn, I am afraid they would be like Kilkenny cats. But it is safe to say this, that it might be profitable for every farmer here to go home and have a breeding: plat next year. This question lies with the farmer. Q.* Will a general planting of the Hallet wheat reduce it to the original ? Prof. Mumford—I expect that is aimed at me because I had some- thing to say about Hallet wheat here today. It is a principle which applies to the breeding of plants and animals that in order to main- — tain them to the state of development to which they have been brought under certain conditions, those same conditons must apply. The Short- horn and Hereford breeds of cattle have been developed under high conditions of feeding, care and shelter. These cattle will not main- tain their high excellence and quality under poor conditions of feed and shelter, and no improved variety of wheat or corn, under careless handling will maintain the good qualities which have been brought by good conditons. , Q. Which would be the most profitable, to plant corn checked or drilled? Prof. Mumford—Is it more profitable to grow corn in hills three or four feet each way or in rows or drills as we say? I will call on Mr. Laughlin to answer that question. Mr. Laughlin—It is better on my farm to grow in hills because the cultivation can be carried on both ways, and if we have a wet season we can get the weeds. ©. What constitutes the best seed corn for the Missouri River bottom land? Prof. Mumford—There are two questions here by different per- sons on the same subject, “What is the best variety of corn for river bottom land in the State of Missouri?’ Who has some varieties of corn growing on river bottom lands? I suppose nearly everyone who has had experience in growing corn on river bottom land would recom- mend two varieties for Missouri—they may not be the only ones but there are two varieties that have given uniformly high yields on CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 85 bottom lands, the St. Charles White and the Boone County White. Is there any other that is better than either of these? Dr. Huston—I am not quite sure about Missouri River bottom, but the Wabash River bottom lands yield the best with the McKinley, which isa yellow corn. While I do not know that it has ever been compared with your St. Charles White corn, it has had to compete with Johnson County White corn and other corns of that class like Riley’s Favorite and Boone County White and the McKinley corn has exceeded the other varieties on the Wabash River bottom. Q. Has anyone tried early corn in a river bottom planted early by the side of large corn? How did it do? Mr. Erwin—I have never planted it, but I have known of its being planted a number of times. It will yield 5 or 6 barrels where the large corn will yield Io or 12. Q. What is the best method of using corn fodder? Prof. Mumford—I presume that this question refers to corn stover. Corn fodder is common in Missouri after the ears have been removed and this is a practical question—it is a live question. We hear a good deal at the present time about silos and shredded fodder and stalk fields and other methods of utilizing the fodder or stover. This is a question upon which we could spend the entire evening in trying to answer it and we mght not come to any better agreement at the end of the discussion than before, but will Mr. Harned please tell us about the best method of utilizing the corn fodder? Mr. Harned—I suppose you mean the fodder after it has been shocked ? Prof. Mumford—Yes. Mr. Harned—Well I think there is a great difference of opinion about that. Iam afraid I will be very much by myself, but I have been convinced that I would not have my fodder shredded if I could have it done free. I believe that it would be worth more taken out of the shocks and scattered on the grass just as it is, the simple and old plan, and I never have been convinced so far that there is anything better. Mr. Erwin—I have handled shredded fodder a good deal and I shred it and then bale it. I often take the shredder into the field and set the baler behind the shredder and use a slat elevator instead of a blower to feed the baler and it is the most economical way. If Mr. fiarned had to go out a day like this and get the fodder in out of the snow, I am sure he would prefer to have it in the barn. Prof. Mumford—How many in the audience haye shredded fodder 86 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. and prefer that method of handling it? Three. How many have shred- ded it and do not like that method of handling it? Five. There are some facts in regard to the utilization of corn fodder in Missouri that it will be well for us to consider. There are thousands of tons of fodder going to waste in the State of Missouri every year. The men who own this corn fodder in the stalk fields get a return of 25 cents an acre for it, or 25 cents a ton as it is now handled. It is a principle which is always correct that you cannot afford to put too much work on a cheap product and as long as we waste so much fodder, we will not spend much money in preparing it in any way, in the silo, or shredding it or any other way. We have performed one experiment in trying to feed shredded fodder as against that not shredded. It seemed to indicate that the animals would eat more fodder not shredded, but it required less fod- der when it was shredded. They had to eat more of the faulty part when it was shredded because we could manage to fool them and work off on them some of the pith, but when it was not shredded they were able to take out the good part and discard the remainder. Mr. Shephard—I have had quite a little experience in feeding fod- der to milk cows and there the effect is very easily detected, beacuse it is an effect that shows in a very few days’ time and I agree with Mr. Harned exactly that the best way to feed fodder is directly from the shock and scattered over the pastures. Often it is greater economy from the fact that it takes less labor that way and the stock can select the best part of it and reject the faulty part, and there is always faulty fodder. The trouble with the shredded fodder is that the faulty part is mixed with the good and the cows are either compelled to eat what is not good or reject the whole, and after quite a little experience I agree exactly with Mr. Harned. Mr. Erwin—I have been feeding shredded fodder since 1900. My cows were disposed to sort the fodder and take out the good and reject the bad, and I have fed corn fodder not shredded to my cows for more than 30 years. I find from much experience in handling a large quantity of corn fodder and getting it from the field during the winter that it 1s cheaper to handle it shredded than from the field direct and I find no difficulty so far as the yield of milk is concerned or so far as the growth of the animals is concerned; and I find that the corn fodder is far better than timothy hay, especially for horses that may be affected with heaves. Mr. Harned—How can Mr. Erwin find it cheaper to shred the fodder than to use it whole, it costs $1.50 a ton to shred it? Mr, Erwin—lIt costs in our section of the country 15 cents a shock CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 87 to get the fodder husked out in the field by hand. We can get the machine and an engineer and feeder to run the shredder for 12% cents a shock. The same team that it takes to move the fodder out of the field will move it to the shredder and you balance the one with the other and then the work is done and the fodder is stored so that it is ready to handle and can be taken out whenever you want to feed it. Q. At what age can high grade cattle be made to weigh 1200 to 1400 pounds, given the ordinary farm treatment and feeding the general farm methods. Mr. Gabbert—I do not know what the ordinary conditions are. I do not know what ordinary farm treatment is. It would take him all his life, the way cattle are treated on some farms. I have fed a good many Hereford steers and I can make them weigh that at 22 months old and I generally sell about that time. But I do not have ordinary farm conditions—I have the best I know how. Q. In the selection of the premium corn, was there any thought given to the value of the fodder? Prof. Miller—The value of the fodder is always considered in making field selections, but on the judging table we can know nothing about that at all. ©. Which is the most nutritious as a feed for horses, hogs ana cattle, white or yellow corn? , Prof. Mumford—Well it depends on the corn. It happens that one of the varieties of corn which has been improved in the direction of high protein content is the white corn, but there is no essential dif- ference in the yield or quality of corn, dependent upon color. Color is not related to the valuable characteristics of corn in any very close way. There are some varieties of yellow corn better for hogs and horses,. and vice versa. METHODS OF CORN BREEDING. (Oyril George Hopkins, Ph, D., Professor of Agronomy in the Agricultural College and Chief in Agronomy and Chemistry in the Agricultural Experiment Station.) From Bulletin No. 82, Ill. Ex. Sta. It is a well established fact that there now exists markets and de- mands for different kinds of corn. The price of corn varies, say from one-half cent to one cent per pound. The cost of protein in the principal stock feeding states varies from three to five cents per pound. In other words, the protein is several 88 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. times more valuable per pound than corn itself. Consequently, stock feeders want more protein in corn. (Very possibly the feeders in the southern states want more carbohydrates to supplement their present more abundant supplies of nitrogenous food stuffs.) The price of corn starch varies from two or three cents to five or even Io cents per pound, depending upon the wholesale or retail nature of the sale. The manufacturers of starch and of glucose sugar, glucose syrup, and other products made from starch want more starch in corn. In its own publication a large commercial concern, which uses enor- nous quantities of corn, makes the following statements: “A bushel of ordinary corn, weighing 56 pounds, contains about 4% pounds of germ, 36 pounds of dry starch, 7 pounds of gluten, and five pounds of bran or hull, the balance in weight being made up of water, soluble matter, etc. The value of the germ lies in the fact that it contains over 40 per cent of corn oil, worth, say 5 cents per pound, while the starch is worth 1% cents, the gluten 1 cent, and the hull about Y cent per pound. “Tt can readily be seen that a variety of corn containing, say one pound more oil per bushel would be in large demand. “Farmers throughout the country do well to communicate with their respective agricultural experiment stations and secure their co-operation along these lines.” These are statements and suggestions which should, and do, attract the attention of experiment station men. They are made by the Glucose Sugar Refining Company of Chicago, a company which purchases and uses, in its six factories, about fifty million bushels of corn annually. According to these statements, if the oil of corn could be increased one -pound per bushel, the actual value of the corn for glucose factories would be increased 5 cents per bushel; and the president of the Glucose Sugar Refining Company has personally assured the writer that his company would be glad to pay a higher price for high oil corn whenever it can be furnished in large quantities. The increase of five cents per bushel on fifty million bushels would add $2,500,000 to the value of the corn pur- chased by this one company each year. The glucose factories are now extracting the oil from all the corn they use and are unable to supply the market demand for corn oil. On the other hand, to these manufac- turers, protein is a cheap by-product and consequently they want less protein in corn. Corn with a lower oil content is desired as a feed for bacon hogs, especially for our export trade, very extensive and thorough investi- gations conducted in Germany and Canada having proved conclusively that ordinary corn contains too much oil for the production of the hard, CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 89 firm bacon which is demanded in the markets of Great Britain and Continental Europe. The methods of corn breeding devised by the Illinois Experiment Station and now used not only by us, but also by the Illinois Seed Corn Breeders’ Association, and, to some extent, by other Experiment Sta- tions and other corn breeders, have for their object the improvement of corn—in yield and in quality. In the main the methods are now the same as we have employed for the past six years and they have given results which enable us to assert with confidence that by these methods corn can be improved in a very marked degree and for many different purposes. The yield of corn can be increased, and the chemical com- position of the kernel can be changed as may be desired, either to in- crease or to decrease the protein, the oil, or the starch. Following is a brief description of the methods of corn breeding which we practice and which we have recommended to others: PHYSICAL SELECTION OF SEED CORN. - The most perfect ears obtainable of the variety of corn which it is desired to breed should be selected. These ears should conform to the desirable standards of this variety and should possess the principal properties which belong to perfect ears of corn, so far as they are known and as completely as it is possible to secure them. These physical char- acteristics and properties include the length, circumference, and shape ef the ear and of the cob; the number of rows of kernels and the num- ber of kernels in the row; the weight and color of the grain and of the cob; and the size and shape of the kernels. In making this selection the breeder may have in his mind a perfect ear of corn and make the physical selection of seed ears by simple inspection, or he may make absolute counts and measurements and reduce the physical selection al- most to an exact or mathematical basis. In this connection let me suggest that there is some danger of corn breeders making too much of what might be called fancy points in select- ing seed ears. We should learn the facts which are facts and not base cur selections too much upon mere ideas and opinions. For example, it is not known that ears whose tips are well filled and capped with kernels are the best seed ears. Indeed it is not improbable that the selec- tion of such seed ears will cause the production of shorter ears and a reduced yield per acre. It is true that the percentage of shelled corn from a given ear is the greater, the greater the proportion of corn to the cob, but our interest in that percentage is very slight compared to that of yield per acre, and perhaps for the greatest possible yield of go MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. slielled corn per acre it requires that the ears shall have good sized cobs. Possibly the corn which shall ultimately surpass all others for yield per acre will have tapering and not cylindrical ears. These are some of the points regarding which men have some ideas and opinions, but as yet we have no definite facts, and we shall need several years more to obtain absolute knowledge regarding some of these points. Let us base our selections of seed corn first upon known facts and performance rec- ords, and secondly upon what one may call his “type” of corn. CHEMICAL SELECTION BY MECHANICAL EXAMINATION. The selection of seed ears for improved chemical composition by mechanical examination of the kernels is not only of much assistance to the chemist in enabling him to reduce greatly the chemical work involved in seed corn selection, but it is of the greatest practical value to the ordinary seed corn grower who is trying to improve his seed corn with very limited service, if any, from the analytical chemist: This chemica’ sciection of seed ears by mechanical examination, as well as by chemical apalysis (which is described below), is based upon two facts: 1. That the ear of corn is approximately uniform throughout in the chemical composition of its kernels. 2. That there is a wide variation in the chemical composition of different ears, even of the same variety of corn. These two facts are well illustrated in Table r. TABLE 1—PROTEIN IN SINGLE KERNELS. Ear A, Ear B, Ear OC, Ear D, protein, | protein, | protein, | protein, per cent.|per cent.|per cou nee cent. INCINOUINO ML te recat ss. <, ooeeiine ce ede anes 12.46 11.53 7.45 8.72 GRMN Gl NQeu) seen Ponca vasapuadatenan dade Meee Gree ee 12.54 | 12.32 | 7.54 | 8.41 IEGENOLNN GOs cnet. alec eae le nn en 2 Ae 12.44 | 12.19 | 7.69 | 8.73 ierneloNOstane hss ites decree ae Ee Stslteeas | 12.50 12.54 7.47 | 8.31 IXGENGI ANG Dine vnctccet eile ay ad ee es eee 12.30 | 12.14 | 7.74 8.02 Mernelt NO NO Sieced 0k chee Cane cen he eee a te 12.49 12.95 | 8.70 8.76 OTH GION G al ltiss ae os coe ole aac ORO ee 12.50 12.84 8.46 8.89 KeGrnel NOs: Siecase cts ck he. Sonne J Soetoro elects 12.14 * 8.69 9.02 Kiernolen ote Ole soctia: tote ober ioe cea at ween a eee ed 12.14 12.04 | 8.86 8.96 IXGnnelaNO Ofc cs ik se ac cee cot ce Ca eee eee eae 12.71 12.75 | 8.10 8.89 *Determination lost by accident. It will be observed that, while there are, of course, small differ- ences among the different kernels of the same ear, yet each ear has an individuality as a whole, the difference in composition between different ears being much more marked than between different kernels of the same ear. The uniformity of the individual ear makes it possible to estimate or to determine the composition of the corn by the examination or anal- ysis of a few kernels. The remainder of the kernels on the ear may CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. QI then be planted if desired. The wide variation in the composition be- tween different ears furnishes a starting point for the selection of seed in any of the several different lines of desired improvement. The methods of making a chemical selection of ears of seed corn by a simple mechanical examination of the kernels is based upon the fact that the kernel of corn is not homogeneous in structure, but consists of several distinct and readily observable parts of markedly different chem- ical composition. (See illustrations.) Aside from the hull which sur- rounds the kernel, there are three principal parts in a grain of corn: I. The darker colored and rather hard and horny layer lying next to the hull, principally in the edges and toward the tip end of the kernel, where it is about 3 millimeters, or % of an inch, in thickness. 2. ‘The white, starchy-appearing part occupying the crown end of the kernel and usually also immediately surrounding, or partially sur- rounding, the germ. 3. The germ itself which occupies the central part of the kernel toward the tip end. These different parts of the corn kernel can be readily recognized by merely dissecting a single kernel with a pocket knife, and it may be added that this is the only instrument needed by anybody in making a chemical selection of seed corn by mechanical examination. The horny layer which usually constitutes about 65 per cent of the corn kernel contains a large proportion of the total protein in the kernel. The white, starchy part constitutes about 20 per cent of the whole kernel, and contains a small proportion of the total protein. The germ constitutes only about Io per cent of the corn kernel, but, while it is rich in protein, it also contains more than 85 per cent of the total oil content of the whole kernel, the remainder of the oil being distributed in all of the other parts. | By keeping in mind that the horny layer is large in proportion and also quite rich in protein, and that the germ, although rather small in proportion, is very rich in protein, so that these two parts contain a very large proportion of the total protein in the corn kernel, it will be 1cadily seen that by selecting ears whose kernels contain more than the average proportion of germ and horny layer we are really selecting ears which are above the average in their protein content. As a matter of fact, the method is even more simple than this, because the white starchy part is approximately the complement of, and varies inversely as the sum of the other constituents; and to pick out seed corn of high protein content it is only necessary to select those ears whose kernels show a relatively small proportion of the white, starchy part surrounding the germ, 92 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. As more than 85 per cent of the oil in the kernel is contained in the germ, it follows that ears of corn are relatively high or low in their oil content, according as their kernels have a larger or smaller proportion of germ. In selecting seed corn by mechanical examination for improvement in composition we remove from the ear a few average kernels; cut two or three of these kernels into cross sections and two or three other kernels into longitudinal sections and examine these sections as they are cut, usually simply with the naked eye. If we are selecting seed ears for high protein content we save those ears whose kernels show a small proportion of the white starch imme- diately adjoining or surrounding the germ. If selecting corn for low protein content we look for a larger proportion of white starch sur- rounding the germ. Our results have shown that the white starch in this position, that is, surrounding the germ toward the tip end of the kernel, is a better index of the protein content than the starch in the crown end. If we are selecting seed ears for high oil content we save those ears whose kernels show a large proportion of firm and solid germ; while if seed of low oil content is desired, we look for a small proportion of germ in the kernel. It should be emphasized that it is not the absolute, but proportion- ate, size or quantity of germ or of white starch which serves as a guide in making these selections. CHEMICAL SELECTION BY CHEMICAL ANALYSIS. In selecting seed corn by chemical analysis we remove from the in- dividual ear two adjacent rows of kernels as a representative sample. This sample is ground and analyzed as completely as may be necessary to enable us to decide whether the ear is suitable for seed for the par- ticular kind of corn which it is desired to breed. Dry matter is always determined in order to reduce all other determinations to the strictly uni- form and comparable water-free basis. If, for example, we desire to change only the protein content, then protein is determined. If we are breeding to change both the protein and the oil, then determinations of both of these constituents must be made. For a satisfactory breeding plot, about 20 to 40 selected seed ears are required. If the breeder desires to make only physical improve- ment then he should select, say, 40 of the most nearly perfect ears which it is possible to pick out by inspection or by exact physical measurements. if it is desired to improve the composition or quality of the corn as well as the physical properties, then at least 200 physically perfect ears should CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 93 be selected, and, from these 200 cars, the 40 ears which are most suitable as seed for the particular kind of corn which it is desired to breed should be selected, either by mechanical examination of sections of kernels, which anybody cari make, or by chemical analysis, or by a combination of these two methods. In our own work we now commonly select by physical iigpection Or measurement the 200 ears; then, from these 200 ears, we select by mechanical examination of sections of kernels the best 50 or roo ears, and from this lot we finally select by chemical analysis the best 20 to 40 seed ears for planting. ‘This combination of methods effects a very satisfactory seed selection and requires only one-half as inuch chemical work as would be required if the method of chemical analysis alone were employed. Table 2 shows very fairly the degree of seed improvement which may be accomplished by these different methods of selection, when breed- ing to change only the protein content of corn. It may be stated that equally satisfactory results may be obtained in chemical selection by mechanical examination for securing seed ears of high or low oil content. For example, the writer has selected by mechanical examination, from a lot of 272 ears of corn, 18 ears for high oil content which averaged 5.24 per cent of oil; and, from the same lot of corn, 30 ears were’selected for low oil content which averaged 4.13 per cent oil, making an average difference of 1.11 per cent of oil. TABLE 2-SOME FAIR ILLUSTRATIONS OF ACTUAL RESULTS OBTAINED IN SE- LECTION OF SEED CORN. (Protein, average per cent.) 8 im ae oa S ce g = x= oO Soo S 3 B = p_2 2 a at ad Be ed iS ie) Wantot i Biba eater om ley ri : = w ral Be leges Webel ve oe ® ako - BO = ® : 3 Siete =o = : 3 eS aes 28 th : 8 Silverl MAN. ccs iee casein aalss etleltincs stapcls e'stdhs aferertalelave 10.00 9.47 8.77 7.97 7.00 Boone COmnty) WRG. ce cectecccics slots salut cerns cle 10.57 9.72 9.36 8.84 8.69 EUS aN ee tera nohrg et arate inte ics Gratolsss ete ic e wieinielavatapersiere 11.96 11.36 10.79 10.08 8.82 EC AMUN e een aoeoatns setae Sec ksinte 11.96 12.44 13.33 14.03 14.63 MOAT IAS cane woes Chics arse SSaoor 11.27 11.84 12.43 13.12 14.71 Yellow Dent.... Fae Pease dociitot.s 11.14 11.64 12.11 12.55 13.24 GNC YZ SRA VOL OC re citau sativa icice/-f cicreistacs a= eis \elereje eal sistas 11.02 11.38 12.41 12.99 15.78 IBUETS eV VEL GC tree siete oy eatcloe tin hcleyereyoeid o-a@ sletsie’< se/siehe 12.48* 12.88 14.36 14.87 15.71 RTs Sia VV TG O ta got ane ccs sraet Qatoete cre cinrcc's sereisieen ieicleiowee 9.20% 9.10 (Otte 7.56 7.08 Leaming.. ah Nees 11.26 DUA sc csavzrorarctesail are srasatorelests ask aesee Leaming....... Bae ansotre san BOSE pater 11.26 TOLGTHIR aes eRe Rec a cisails wtetaciniciese * Average protein content of ten field rows of Burr’s White after four years’ breeding for high protein. + Originally from same stock of Burr’s White as preceding, but bred four years for low protein. * + Two lots of 42 ears each selected from the same lot of 200 ears for two breeding plots, high protein and low protein, the seed for which is selected by physical inspection and me- chanical examination but without chemical analysis of individual ears. 04 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. li the method of mechanical examination alone is employed in mak- ing the chemical selection, then, if possible, there should be some chem- ica! control of the work, at least until the breeder has become sufficiently skilled, or has had sufficient experience, to feel that he knows how to make a chemical selection of seed ears by mechanical examination of kernels. Such a chemical control does not involve a large amount of chemical work. In Illinois the Experiment Station offers such a chem- ical control to farmers who will agree to make the selection of the best possible seed, both by physical inspection of ears and mechanical exam- ination of kernels and who will further agree to secure data and breed the corn in accordance with our directions. This control is affected by analyzing only two samples of corn each year; One composite sample of the rejected ears, five average kernels being taken from each ear, and one composite sample of the 20 to 40 selected seed ears, twenty average kernels being taken from each of these ears, and each of these two composite samples being properly labeled and analyzed. One of the best selections which has yet been made by mechanical examination was accomplished last spring by a farmer who is breeding corn for higher protein content. Out of a lot of 165 ears of corn he selected 15 ears whose protein content averaged 1.48 per cent higher than that of the 150 rejected ears, as was determined by the chemical analysis of a composite sample from each of the two lots. Because of the chemical control which the station affords him, he knows each year iust how much he has accomplished. If the purpose of breeding a kind of corn is principally to change its content of a single constituent, as to increase protein, then the selec- tion of the best 40 ears is simple and regular by either method; but if it is desired to effect changes in the content of two constituents, as to increase the protein and to increase the oil in the same corn, then one could hardly expect to make much progress in both directions, if he relied solely upon mechanical examination of kernels for chemical selec- tion of seed ears. Even after the chemical analyses of I00 ears have been made it requires some computation to determine which are really the best 40 ears. For example, an ear may be desirable for seed because of its high protein content, but it may not be sufficiently high in oil. In order to reduce the selection to an exact basis, we have adopted see mathematical computations for all such cases. For high protein and high oil in the same corn, we multiply the percentage of protein by the percentage of oil and use the product as the selection coefficient, the forty et products designating the forty best ears. CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION. O§ For low protein and low oil we multiply the percentages together and use the lowest product as the selection coefficient. For high protein and low oil in the same corn, we divide the per- centage of protein by the percentage of oil and use the highest quotients as our selection coefficients. TABLE 3—SELECTION OF SEED CORN FOR HIGH PROTEIN AND HIGH OIL. | i Protein Oil Selection No. Ear. incorn. jin corn.|coefficient LET Pe ned 9 eT Reem eR TL bE Micnee aiedvaa ne aloe wadielcle Gees 11.17 6.03 67.30 aT Los ee Ta aie ea a Siaiaje e SibieerkaG eile ee Sowere sds 12.66 4.90 62.00 De are nee ye eet DO. Sieve sade s. balan nia aicVcta,Sfalle svslele- el dks slvle.ocelaicy aisuateels 13.60 4.92 66.89 REE TR Le RT ee ee amid tle eae ew seals alu we noes saesiste se 10.85 4.55 49.89 ESPN ere i FOE tig SP Ate toreratel s Wreicialont reiaiell- hwielelehaterele vu ie ale sveavertiejelers 11.01 5.72 62.97 OO coe tetap oo cnc = SHS MEEPS AICP hs ne ES EIA LE A 11.50 4.77 54.81 ea arn iis aan Sa ee eee luis Oi ola wae ay slewisize sasise aie ass 14.71 5.56 81.75 Oe CEO ROR OSCE COSDISD UDOT RO RS DOE E TIS Gig UIB TEE > DOO COBTE ene eSe errr 10.07 4.73 47.62 OR recht ee ee ray cp cfere eveca vals minis aia oa ois Sale are/erelsiele.cyeTerasSeeiejaiey 2is!a’sja 13.14 5.44 71.53 iV) cobb apademaseucnaat BEA Ce Urn Boe MICs CC AAIAP PIRG ANB CREAR SEE ecarae 10.19 5.80 59.10 Le meee te eee etre. Sug dalavais nico eruieleieie nd Sis cmiscisiesewists le Gieislevsiats 11.01 5.97 65.78 ee eRe ReeCee iae ore cee dae ait oes Reve-ale elas araebieh, Zajstelarseial vie ele 10.39 4.73 49.13 116} 5. CORA OSU EGO OO aE OE eee Dae ae omic So a San eR IE ake 13.96 5.28 73.72 VET AZ OMA Tree ne tenitetas. airate siersteioe Ceietee cm ceases ses 11.87 5.26 62.50 For low protein and high oil we divide in the same manner, but use the lowest quotients for selecting the best ears. Table 3 illustrates the value of this method as applied to the selec- tion of the best seed ears for both high protein and high oil. It will be observed that some ears which are high in only one desirable constituent (see No. 2 and No. 10) must be discarded because the selection coefficients which they give are even below the average; while other ears which may be quite low in one constituent (see No. I and No. 3) still furnish acceptable selection coefficients. THE BREEDING PLOT. The 4o selected seed ears are planted in 40 separate parallel rows, one ear to a row, consequently the breeding plot should be at least 40 corn rows wide and long enough to require about three-fourths of an ear to plant a row. It is well to shell the remainder of the corn from all of the 40 ears, mix it together, and use it to plant a border several rows wide entirely around the breeding plot, to protect it, especially from foreign pollen. In my judgment one of the most practical and satisfactory locations for the breeding plot is in a larger field of corn planted with seed which is as nearly as possible of the same breeding as that planted in the breed- ing plot itself. The stock seed for this field should always be selected from the previous year’s breeding plot and it may well include as many of the 160 rejected ears as are known to be above the average of the 200. 96 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Or, if the breeding plot can be well isolated from all other corn fields and still occupy good soil, this also makes a very suitable location for it. The very best ears of seed corn are planted in the center rows of the breeding plot, the remainder of the ears being planted in approxi- mately uniform gradation to either side, so that the least desirable ears aniong the 40 are planted in the outside rows; and in the final selection of the best field rows from which the next year’s seed ears are to be taken, some preference is given to the rows near the center of the plot. While we are not yet ready to make absolute statements regarding the matter, nevertheless, from the data which we have secured, and are securing upon the subject, we now recommend that every alternate row of corn in the breeding plot be completely detasseled before the pollen matures, and that all of the seed corn to be taken from the plot be selected from these 20 detasseled rows. This method absolutely prohibits self- pollination or close-pollination of the future seed. By self-pollination is meant the transfer of pollen from the male flower of a given plant to the female flower of the same plant; and by close-pollination is meant the transfer of pollen from the male flower of one plant to the female lower of another plant in the same row, both of which grew from kernels from the same seed ear. The transfer of pollen from one plant to another plant which grew from kernels from a different seed ear, we term cross-pollination. We have been for several years accumulating data which show that artificial self-pollination is very injurious to the vitality and vigor of the seed produced, and we have also secured data pointing toward an injurious effect of close-pollination even by natural methods, so that we feel jus- tified in recommending, at least tentatively, the use of cross-pollination in seed corn breeding. It is also recommended that in the 20 rows of corn which are not detasseled no plants which appear imperfect, dwarfed, immature, barren, or otherwise undesirable, should be allowed to mature pollen. Detassel- ing is accomplished by going over the rows two or three times and carefully pulling out the tassels as they appear. Occasionally an entire row is detasseled because of the general in- feriority of the row as a whole. FIELD SELECTIONS BASED ON PERFORMANCE RECORDS. As the corn crop approaches maturity we are then ready for the first time to begin at the real beginning in the selection of seed corn; that is, with the whole corn crop and the whole corn plant, as it stands in the field. Till’ FIRST CHAMPIONSHIP ROADSTER TEAM. The above cut was made from a photograph of the first prize championship roadster team at the St. Louis Werld’s Fair. ‘Sometimes’ and “Always,” a beautiful pair of chestnuts, full brothers, four and five years old. They have been shown in doubie harness through two seasons, making sixteen shows and winning sixteen first premiums. “Always” has made twenty-three shows in single harness, winning eighteen first premiums, four second and one third, being beaten in three of the above rings by his mate “Scmetimes.”’ ‘“‘Scmetimes’” won at the World's Fair in single harness two firsf, four seecnd, and was fourth in the world’s championship for roadsters. Missouri's claim to being the first State in the Union for first class road horses has been fully sustained by this great team. The above team owned and exhibited by Alex. Bradford, Jr., Columbia, Boone county, Misscuri. CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION, 97 We then make our first selection of seed corn from the field rows (each of which is the progeny of a separate single ear) on the basis of performance record. Each of the twenty detasseled rows is carefully examined. Some of them are discarded for seed purposes by simple in- spection, and with some rows this decision may be made early in the growing season; because, when each field row is planted from a separate individual ear, that row has an individuality which in many cases is very marked.- It may show very imperfect germination (in the most careful work the germinating power of each ear is ascertained before planting), it may be of slow growth, produce small weak plants, or numerous barren stalks. The plants may be tall and slender or very thick and short. In one row the ears may be borne high on the stalks, while in the adjoining row they may average one or two feet nearer the ground. One row may yield more than twice as much corn as an adjoining row on the same kind of soil. As a matter of fact, when one begins to breed corn by the row system (one seed ear to each row), he is usually surprised to find that the plants in some rows are so very dif- ferent from those in others, as will be seen from data from one of our 1901 breeding plot, which are given in Table 4. TABLE 4—-PERFORMANOE RECORD OF BREEDING PLOT, 1901. (Breeding for high protein.) Weight of i Protein in 2 Field Row Number. ecedicie! pouees Uo gace ad50 OC eo DULSERG OTE MISC Aaa CREE Ar Oe anne AA Mead tes aug aOR AR 12.06 91.0 Seer ee Sole myo OC OR OBE ROBE Cio CAPCCHIOHOOIIE DU: maCaric cBOD EOE Cea 12.17 85.0 Bho 26 50's GO QAU ODOC OCU ERT Or ten enters (os Ape at ee owt ¢ SS Saamnip rh © 12.19 98.5 iy 0d00 SECA DDE MOCO STOOD STO eat Smee shan Onan ob ay ee ee ae eee 12.26 99.5 Dots Sot de SoG OCS CA OOE IACI GE Ron hoe BBE OEE: MESS eC ee Snt ms a amen Cami rwn A 12.31 77.0 MT ere cin ao Toe SOIR AS Con ELE Ties reas Nokon Selb acdeake 12.40 118.0 Hsoce \ oop GSS SOCBP OS ERC ETS En Toney: lns ake Skt im cet Sue pele ear ee emg a nay reg 12.66 116.0 Bho tno need \aSdbOS SSE SOSA SOC AEE eo nee nn Oni e neCne 12:83 | 54.5 Wh seed seas NCBA OS GUISE SEE Se SER Sane ann Ee nee Se a ee 12.90 107.0 hoc c8Ob odbc Spe eS Oe NEAT E AE REE ECC Se Aoi Nd eA mn eager ins et Oi 15.78 103.0 lc occ nd don Gls SSO RAISES U EE EN ae GP Ene Cea ae a nk Sena aie gran 12.92 87.0 Les once nad bcagb mop ood ie ASD IGE DHCD Oa Cae Ie art em gan AE Rebs Sere wae 8 12.90 127.5 SEP eee Serie need 6 eines oo lee sia® eeadins Sak Seles dac™ Seine seh one wees 12.72 113.0 MARES aes aoa hp in aan ent. Men E Ree ct Pace co wchicows lis cheele maaae 12.45 123.5 Wie oe coco dacon= obib bod, CG Ren CUBE LEBER Eat A pr etnIne 1 ieee ia tn Renna er ale ito 12.32 103.5 MG Perm AYR eas Aeterna eee eRe tom ouacteaicas Auisaeiciaite fo sed bouleser 12.31 92.0 Cee ee eT eee Wee ot ese ate hon Oe ano cats Sob pdaaee’ 12.23 85.5 eneont:nd do SMa Bo SECRET ORS nate nnn ADORE fe eine PRISE MU Rents ante Soest Fe 12.18 117.0 1s’ cod ottecmtec J ROCCE OUI TSEC IE oe eae tice an setae Nn abe re nc 12.07 140.5 Falls orice SEGHOSAE SOc UNLEASH ang een aR NCITING Oe mnRE RINE aS ag RA 12.06 97.0 E\TIETENEES soe dobre bab cca ae AEB SE SEER ESE HL ee DDE ERE oes 12.59 101.9 We take no seed corn from a row which produces a large proportion of imperfect plants, barren stalks, small ears or a low yield, even though a few apparently good seed ears might be found in the crop which that row yields. The points to be considered in the selection of the field rows, and finally in the individual plants from which seed ears may be taken should A—T 98 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. include the per cent of “stand” of plants, the height and physical pro- portions of the plant, the character and amount of foliage, the position of the ear on the stalk, the length and size of the ear shank, the per cent of ear-bearing plants, the time of maturity, the total yield of the row, the average weight of the ears, and the number of good seed ears which the row produces. Some of these points can be determined by inspection; some require actual counts and measurements or weights. The corn from each of the detasseled rows which have not been rejected by inspection is now harvesied. First, all of the ears on a row which appear to be good ears and which are borne on good plants ina good position and with good ear shanks and husks are harvested, placed in a bag with the number of the row, and finally weighed together with the remainder of the crop from one ear to a row; then select your seed for the next year, on the basis of performance record, from about 10 ro\vs which produce the highest yield and the best ears. Second: Breed corn for a purpose. If you wish to feed corn, breed and grow high protein corn. If you wish to grow corn for the starch and glucose factories, breed and grow corn the factory wants. Third: Until we have facts, don’t devote too much time to “fancy points,’ such as trying to produce kernels on the tip end of the cob, or trying to reduce the size of the cob, or trying to make the tip end of the ear as large as the butt, or pulling out suckers, or doing other things the uitimate effect of which is unknown. It is not yet known with any de- gree of certainty whether such things are beneficial, injurious, or with- out effect, on the production of the crop. And don’t feel that you can’t breed corn even if you are unable to detassel barren stalks. Last year we had fields with 50 per cent of bar- ren stalks, this year in some fields from that seed we have about five- tenths of one per cent of barren stalks, and these examples fairly illus- trate the tremendous effect of soil and season and condition of growth, as compared with breeding, upon the production of barren stalks. Barren stalks bear no ears, and the whole tendency of Nature’s Law is to breed them out, and even without the intervention of man. As a matter of fact, in order to give to barren stalks an equal chance with ear-bearing plants to propagate themselves, we should be obliged to detassel every car-bearing plant in the field. In studying this problem it should be borne in mind that the female parent of the barren stalk was not barren. It is probably much more important that we absolutely prevent self- pollination and close-pollination by detasseling alternate rows, but ever this practice is still an experiment. It is very true that exceedingly poor CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 99 corn has been produced by artificial or hand self-pollination, but recent experiments have also shown that corn may be degenerated by artificial cross-pollination; and it should be understood that our recommendation to detassel alternate rows in the breeding plot is tentative, and I cer- tainly would not urge this practice. Probably such detasseling will prove somewhat helpful to the corn breeder, but we know that very great im- provement can be made without detasseling at all, simply by selecting seed on the basis of performance record and for desirable quality or composition. THECTESTING OF CORN FOR SEED: (Albert H. Hume, First Assistant in Crop Production. From Bulletin No. 96, Illinois Experi- ment Station.) In suggesting the plan of testing each ear of seed corn, we do not mean to insist that every ear must be tested every season and in every place. We do insist, however, that this would be within easy range of possibility, as the following pages will show. Before time for planting, corn growers should test a sufficient amount of their stock of seed, ear by ear, so that they will know what they have on hand. It may or may not be necessary thus to test the entire stock, but that it would have been an extremely profitable procedure the past season for most farmers, can scarcely be doubted. It is not sufficient to accept the warrant of the dealer from whom the seed is purchased, however trustworthy he may be. It is not possible for those who handle seed on the largest scale to give the closest atten- tion to its quality. The following devices for testing are suggested as being obtainable for the general farmer. Methods of Testing —tThere are several methods of testing corn, all of which depend upon the same principle, namely, that of supplying suf- ficient moisture and warmth to the kernels to cause them to sprout. The traditional ways of determining the quality of seeds, such as floating them in water, or heating them until they pop, or breaking them and noting the fracture, or ‘cutting them and noting the appearance of the inside, cannot be called tests, although it must be granted that by practice some corn growers have become fairly expert in telling whether or not a given sample of corn will grow. Such methods are not only less accur- ate, but if carefully performed require as much or more time than need be taken to make a germination test. One of the best and simplest ways of sprouting seed is to take a common dinner plate and fill it nearly full of sand. The sand should be I0O0 “MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. as clean and white as possible. Such sand will be less likely to mould than that which has much organic matter in it. This makes it much more desirable for use in testing, for moulds interfere with the germina- tion of the corn. After the sand is placed on the plate, it should be moistened. ‘This can best be done with a small sprinkler, but if one is not at hand, the water may be poured careiully out of any small vessel or sprinkled with the hand. After sprinkling the water on the sand, it is well to mix the sand with the fingers until it is all equally moist. Do not saturate the sand with water. Special caution is necessary in this respect, for if the sand is too wet, the corn will fail to germinate for lack of air. Numerous failures have been reported in testing corn on plates of sand, the most of which probably resulted from having the sand too wet. Having the sand properly placed and moistened, the kernels to be tested should be pressed into the sand, small end down, in order as they are taken from the ear. While taking the kernels from the ear, hold it in the left hand and remove with a pocket-knife or a pair of small, strong tweezers, a kernel two inches from the butt of the ear. A little practice will make it easy to remove a kernel with the knife and hold it between the thumb and the knife blade until it is put in place in the sand. Then turn the ear one-fourth around and take another kernel in the same manner, say two inches nearer the tip; then turn the ear the same dis- tance again and take another kernel two inches nearer the tip. For the fourth kernel, turn the ear again one-fourth around and take the kernel about two inches from the tip. Four kernels is a large enough number to take from one ear for practical work. If they are properly taken, they represent both ends and all sides of the ear, so far as vitality is con- cerned. The four kernels from each ear must be placed in a separate group, and it is best that the group be marked or numbered to corre- spond. The Germinating Room.—After the kernels of corn are all placed as described above, they should be covered by turning a second plate over them to prevent too rapid evaporation of the moisture from the sand. They may then be left in a warm temperature to sprout. As fast as the kernels are well germinated, they should be removed from the sand, and a careful record taken of the number which have sprouted. It has been proved by experiment that the best temperature for germinat- ing corn is 77 degrees F. This is only a little higher than the temper- ature of an ordinary living-room. More harm will result from a con- siderable decrease of temperature than from a slight increase. On the average farm it is not necessary to construct a special room CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. IOI for germinating. Usually the plates of corn will germinate well if put beside a stove, taking care that they do not get too hot. The plates must be inspected each day after they are put into the germinating room, and if the sand is becoming dry, add a little water. The amount to be put on must be determined by practice, for it will vary with the kind of sand used and with the humidity of the room. If one is fortunate enough to have furnace heat in the cellar, he will probably have a place near the furnace where the heat will be about right for germinating corn. Such heat was utilized by Dr. C. G. Hopkins, of the University of IIli- nois, in testing the corn for his own farm in southern Illinois, with en- tirely satisfactory results. Testing with Plates and Sand—The method of using the plates of sand for germinating corn is very practicable in that any one can use it without purchasing any new material. Dinner plates are at hand on any farm, and sand may usually be had from the roadway or river bot- tom. But where there is much testing to do the method is inconvenient, and in some cases unprofitable, from the fact that it takes too much time. Time is lost in filling the plates with sand and in gauging the proper amount of moisture, when it must be renewed from time to time. Testing with Box and Cloth—One of the quickest and most con- venient devices for making germination tests is that commonly known as the Geneva Tester, so called because it was first used by Professor Goff at the Geneva Station in New York. This apparatus consists of a water-tight box across which are extended folds of canton flannel. These folds are suspended from wires, and can be removed to dry when not in use. The box must be filled to the depth of about an inch with water, so that the folds of canton flannel will hang down enough to touch the water, and thus be moistened by capillarity. The box should be about 12 by 24 inches and 4 or 5 inches deep. It may be made of wood, gal- vanized iron, tin, or copper, and the wires can be cut from ordinary smooth galvanized fence wire. When kernels of corn are to be tested in this germinating apparatus, they are removed from the ears as de- scribed above, placed between the folds, in regular order and the folds closed together. If it is thought best, the groups of kernels from the separate ears may be numbered with slips of paper. This numbering will not be absolutely necessary if proper care is used to have the groups of kernels correspond to the ears of corn from whence they came. After the kernels are put in place, the folds are drawn together at the top, the lid closed upon the box, and the apparatus left until the kernels ger- minate. When put into this box, the kernels will not usually suffer for moisture during the length of time of one test. This is one of the ad- 102 / MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. vantages of the Geneva Tester over the plate of sand where the mois- tire may need renewing each day, or even oftener. The folds are easily opened when it is necessary to inspect the kernels to count the number which have germinated. Some care is necessary in lifting the tester, that the groups of kernels be not jarred from their places. Testing with Box and Blotters—Another plan is to use a small box, with layers of moistened blotting paper inside. This device consists first of a small box, say a foot long, six inches wide, and five inches deep. The bottom of the box should be made water-tight; if necessary, the cracks may be stopped with white lead or strips of cloth or asbestos. The kernels of corn are kept moist by putting water into the box to a depth of one-half inch more or less. Something must be laid in the box to hold the first blotter up out of the water. Small sticks laid cross- wise of the box will answer this purpose. The blotting papers should be moistened as they are placed in the box. When the first blotter is laid in, either small sticks or wire cloth are put down on top of it to mark the spaces for the separate groups of kernels. These spaces must correspond to the spaces in the frame where the ears of corn are placed. After one layer of blotting paper is covered with the kernels, another similar layer may be put down on top of the first, and so on until the box is filled, or until the desired amount of corn has been put in. Like the plate and sand method and the wooden box Geneva Tester, this device is easy to use on the ordinary farm because it does not neces- sitate the buying of any expensive apparatus or material. If small sticks are substituted for the wire gauze, it will only be necessary to purchase the pieces of blotting paper, which can be secured at a merely nominal cost of almost any printer or stationer. Of course the wooden box will sometimes warp and begin to leak, making it somewhat difficult to keep the blotters from becoming too dry. Where it is desired to use a tester for any large amount of work, it is usually best to have the box made of copper. = : We have gone into the matter of explaining the devices for testing seed corn at some length from the practical standpoint, in the hope that the greatest number of corn growers will arrange to test seed by one of the methods. The method of doing the work is not of such paramount importance as that it be done, and done thoroughly. In advocating the testing, when necessary, of every ear of corn in- tended for seed, we have been met with the objection that “it takes too much time.” We have therefore made some careful computations along this line. In Table 1 we have recorded the time in minutes used in ; i. . CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION. 103 testing each of nine one-bushel lots of corn. Column one gives the num- ber of the lot, column two, the number of the ears in the measured bushel, and column three, the total time used in testing four kernels from each ear, in the Geneva Tester, with which we have been able so far to do our quickest work in testing. TABLE 1. Number of lot. Number OF oars in bushel Total time used in testing. 1 100 45 minutes. 2 F 98 44 minutes. 3 3 75 34 minutes. 4 116 56 minutes. 5 80 48 minutes. 6 77 38 minutes. 7 95 42 minutes, 8 96 46 minutes, 9 126 48 minutes. Total time for9 bushels, 401 minutes. Average time for 1 bushel, 45 minutes. From the above table, it will be seen that the total time used in test- ing 9 bushels of corn of various sized ears was 401 minutes. It takes longer to test a bushel of small ears than a bushel of large ones, but the average time per bushel is 45 minutes. At this rate, counting only 5 acres to one bushel of seed, one man, in 10 hours’ total time, can test every ear of seed corn required to plant 67 acres. Of course the work must be done before planting time. It is suggested that winter evenings might profitably be employed in this way, but if the work is not done in the evenings, let it be done by daylight as part of the regular work. At all events, do not permit it to be overlooked, especially when we have such seed corn as much of that planted in 1904. TABLE 2. Number of ears tested in Time required for testing Number of lot. measured bushel. | in sand. 29 100 80 minutes. 30 98 85 minutes. 31 75 63 minutes. 32 88 75 minutes. 33 92 _ 72 minutes. Total time required to test 5 bushels, 375 minutes. Average time required to test 1 bushel, 75 minutes. As seen by the above, the average time for testing in sand is 75 minutes per bushel as against 45 minutes per bushel with the Geneva 104 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Tester. It is apparent that any one who has any amount of testing to do, can well afford to make a Geneva Tester or have one made, rather than use sand. It is sometimes urged that one who has had sufficient practice can select seed corn which will grow, simply by inspecting it, and that testing ig unnecessary. There are many persons who can tell, with some accuracy, by simple examination, whether or not corn will grow, but we do not believe that inspection can be so accurate as testing. Moreover, the time used in carefully inspecting each ear in a given lot of corn is usually as great or greater than the time used in testing the same ears. The time re- quired depends much upon the care with which the work is done. If four kernels are taken from each ear of corn and each kernel examined carefully and the germ inspected, it will require more time than it will to test the kernels in the Geneva apparatus. The average time used at the station for inspecting thirteen bushels of seed corn with reasonable care, was 3I minutes per bushel. With two lots, when four kernels were removed from each ear and carefully examined, the average time re- quired was 44 minutes per bushel. The average time for testing these same two lots in the Geneva Tester was 32 minutes per bushel. Even when the time element is taken into consideration, the evidence is all in favor of carefully tested seed for the corn grower, as opposed to that selected mechanically. The following table shows the results which were actually attained with 37 different lots of seed corn: Eighteen of these lots of corn came to the Experiment Station from progressive farmers, and nineteen came from the most trustworthy corn specialists to be found. In the table given, column 1 indicates simply the number of the lot of corn tested. Column 2 gives the number of ears in that particular lot, and column 3 indicates the per cent of the corn, taken just as it came to the station, which germinated. This test was simply a composite one. Three kernels were taken from each ear, one from the butt, one from the middle, and one from the tip. After three kernels were thus taken from every ear in the entire lot, they were mixed together, and 100 of them were selected at random. These 100 kernels were germinated and the resulting per cent was put into column 3. After this composite test was made, every ear in each lot was tested, by taking four kernels from an ear and germinating them in sand. In case any one of the four kernels did not grow, the ear from which it came was discarded as unfit for seed. The number of ears thus discarded is recorded in column 4. The remainder were reserved as being good CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION, | 105 for seed. Then, in order to determine whether such testing really accom- plishes the desired object, composite tests were made of the “good corn,” which was reserved for seed, and of the “poor corn,” which was dis- carded. The per cents for the various lots, as derived from these tests, are recorded in columns 5 and 6. TABLE 3. Percent of germination after testing. Number of ears/Composite test} Number of No. of test. tested. of allears. Jears discarded Good corn. Poor corn. 1 41 91.0 11 98.9 82.0 2 439 82.5 144 97.0 68.0 3 81 87.0 12 99.0 72.2 4 371 84.0 95 95.0 55.0 5 34 78.0 18 97.9 72.2 6 330 95.0 51 98.0 80.0 7 433 94.0 38 100.0 72.0 8 414 83.0 124 95.0 63.0 9 552 77.0 299 86.0 67.0 10 389 97.0 31 100.0 85.5 11 88 96.0 14 97.0 80.9 12 80 82.0 18 94.0 70.8 13 298 93.0 44 98.0 71.0 14 89 93.0 10 97.0 66.6 15 60 84.0 22 96.0 77.0 16 18 88.8 5 89.7 66.6 yi 43 83.0 20 90.0 40.0 18 451 96.0 33 99.0 68.0 19 332 93.u 88 98.0 81.0 20 456 62.0 295 93.0 30.0 21 278 74.0 164 86.0 36.0 22 109 37.0 21 97.0 71.4 23 45 83.0 17 97.6 75.0 24 40 51.0 28 97.2 52.3 25 73 89.0 20 95.0 48.0 26 144 92.0 36 95.0 81.0 27 100 93.0 25 97.0 69.8 28 98 91.0 18 95.0 68.9 29 75 94.0 17 95.0 76.0 30 88 87.0 26 96.0 66.6 31 2 93.0 13 93.0 77.0 32 116 90.0 39 93.0 70.0 33 80 86.0 34 83.0 75.0 34 77 68.0 41 74.0 42.0 35 95 74.0 54 90.0 57.0 36 96 64.0 63 80.0 51.0 37 126 97.0 20 96.0 60.3 Averages. 85.19 94.00 66.11 It will be observed that the per cent of germination of the “good corn” in column 5, is higher in every instance than the per cent of ger- mination of the “poor corn,” in column 6; also that there are only two instances—that of test number 33, composed of 80 ears, and that of test number 37, composed of 126 ears—in which the per cent of germination for the good corn is not as high or higher than that of the composite a) sample from which it came. This evidence therefore practically all goes to indicate that the plan is effective. In other words, having given a number of ears of seed corn, it is possible to determine with accuracy which of those ears have the highest average per cent of germinable kernels. 106 ; MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. The average of all the tests of “good corn” in column 5 is 94.00 per cent. The average of the composite tests of the lots of corn from whence those good ears were taken, is 85.19 per cent. The original lots were made up of seed corn, which was carefully selected by ordinary methods bcfore it came to the Agricultural Experiment Station. The difference between 94.00 and 85.19 is 8.81 per cent, in favor of the “good corn,” which is clearly attributable to the fact that every ear was tested and only the “good ones” reserved. That this difference is correct is fur- ther attested by noticing the average per cent of the “poor” lots of corn in column 6, which is 66.11. Evidently from this, no mistake was made in the kind of ears discarded. It is fair to assume, according to the above figures, that the seed corn planted in Illinois during the spring of 1904, might have been at least 8.81 per cent better than it was. Although it does not follow absolutely, it is not far from correct to reason that the crop is 8.81 per cent lighter than it might have been, had the best seed attainable been used. This is a conservative estimate considering that the original lots of corn above were probably better than the average seed corn planted in I[linois in 1904. Granting, then, that 8.81 per cent of the seed planted failed to grow and that there were 1,000,000 bushels of corn used for seed in Illinois, the amount of corn planted which did not grow was 88,100 bushels. Valuing it at $2.00 per bushel, it represented a dead loss of $176,200. This amount alone would pay for testing practically every ear of corn planted in Illinois, counting labor at $1.50 a day. The great loss, how- ever, consists in the shortage of the crop due to this poor seed. The valuation of the corn crop in Illinois, as given in the year book of the Department of Agriculture for the year 1903, was $95,000,000. Count- ing the proportionate loss therefore, which might have been prevented by proper testing of seed corn, we have $8,369,500. The data herein presented certainly justifies the conclusion that such a sum could have been saved by Illinois corn growers the past year by properly testing seed. To bring the matter as closely home as possible to the individual farmer, suppose that he raises 80 acres of corn, and that his normal yield is 60 bushels per acre, giving a total of 4,800 bushels. His average loss this year was 8.81 per cent of that amount, or 422.88 bushels. Valuing this at 40 cents a bushel, we have a loss of $169.15 due to the use of untested seed. This amount would pay the necessary wages for testing every ear of seed corn which would be used on 7,555 acres of land, counting the wages at $1.50 a day. These figures ought to appeal not CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 107 so much to our seed dealers as to farmers and corn growers. They are the people directly interested. Having determined the data above, it is not unreasonable to assert that every corn grower ought to know beyond any peradventure, just what kind of seed corn he pours into his planter boxes at planting time. We do not mean to urge anything unreasonable, and we are not doing so. If we were to test say 1,000 ears of seed corn from a seed house and found them to grow perfectly, we would be ready to admit that the next 1,000 ears were reasonably safe for seed, providing they were the same kind of ears, kept under the same conditions as the first 1,000 had been; but we would not take too much for granted. The object toward which we are all striving, is that agriculture be made an exact science. The testing of each ear of seed corn, whenever necessary, will certainly be a considerable stride in that direction. CORN. PREPARING THE GROUND, PLANTING AND CULTIVATING THE CROP. (Prof. P. G. Holden, in ‘‘Successful Farming.’’) There is no one best method suited to all sections, nor to the dif- ferent soils of a given section, nor even to the different fields of the same farm. Frequently two very different methods may give equally good re- sults. There are no “iron clad” rules which can be followed blindly in the growing of corn any more than in any other farm work. Have good ground, do the work on time and do it thoroughly, should be the object of every corn grower. IMPORTANCE OF GOOD GROUND. Nothing can make up for poor ground. Too many are trying to grow corn on old “worn out” ground that has produced corn and oats fcr years. I met a man at an institute in Illinois who said in all seri- ousness that he was satisfied that the seasons were less favorable for growing corn than they used to be, as he could get no such crops as he formerly raised. It developed that he had grown corn for 17 years in succession on the same piece of ground. No wonder “the seasons were becoming less favorable.” Let us remember that it was only a few years ago that the land oi the Central West was broken from the virgin sod, and because we 108 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. have been able to crop the ground continuously in the past is no assur- ance that it can be done in the future. The fact is that the time is near at hand when we must pay greater attention to the fertility of our soil, to the conserving and restoring of the elements of plant food or we will soon be compelled to pay out mil- lions of dollars each year for these elements in the form of commercial fertilizers as is now done in the east. The tremendous importance attached to this question cannot be ap- preciated by those who have had no experience in using commercial fer- tilizers in the older settled parts of our country. What is needed is more clover, better use of the barn yard manure and less of the continuous cropping with corn and oats. FALL PLOWING FOR CORN. There is a great diversity of opinions regarding the merits of fall aud spring plowing, even in the same neighborhood. Among the ad- vantages of fall plowing may be named the following points: Ist. The work can be done at the slackest time in the year when both men and teams would otherwise be idle. 2nd. Having the ground already plowed in the spring gives us time to better prepare the ground and what is of equally great impor- tance, to get our corn in on time. 3rd. Better prepared and warmer seed bed and consequently a better stand of corn. 4th. Less danger from insect injuries, especially in the case of scd ground. 5th. Weeds are prevented from seeding and the seeds already in the ground will mostly germinate and be killed by the fall freezes before seeding. . This is especially true of early fall plowing. DISADVANTAGES. Ist. Occasional losses from blowing and washing. 2nd. Unless the ground is disced early in the spring there is loss of moisture and a consequent “firing” of the corn during the latter part of July and August, especially in dry seasons. 3rd. The fall plowing does not give as good an opportunity to spread manure during the late summer and through the winter. During the past year the Soils Department of the Iowa State Col- lege conducted experiments with fall and spring plowing in different parts of Iowa and in every case the yields of corn were greater on the fall plowing than on the spring plowing. While the evidence is generally CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION. 109 iu favor of the fall plowing in the corn beit, yet the difference will gen- erally not be as great as indicated by this year’s results. The mistake is commonly made of leaving the fall plowed ground without discing until time to plant. The ground has become packed by the snow and rain and should be disced or at least harrowed as soon as the oat seed- ing is over. This will conserve the moisture and prevent the “‘firing”’ of the corn in August, so common on fall plowing. Ground that is very rolling and likely to wash should not be plowed in the fall. Early fall plowing is generally advisable where the stubble ground is very weedy. In the corn belt where the area put into corn is large and the corn planting period is short it is the best kind of management to fall plow all stubble and sod ground. We should bear in mind that one of the most serious losses each year to the corn crop is due to late planting. The experiments show that late planted corn seldom yields as much as the earlier planted corn and the quality is inferior. The ground becomes hard and out of con- dition, the weeds have drawn upon the moisture and available plant food, the corn comes to the dry spell in August at a more critical stage, and it matures slowly, contains more water and is much more likely to be caught by frost. | Every year there are thousands and thousands of farmers who lose heavily from late planting. Many of these are good farmers, but are unexpectedly delayed with the spring work by a combination of bad weather, sick horses and scarcity of help. This matter of readiness in the spring is of great importance in the corn belt and is made all the more so because it is practically out of the question to secure outside help at this time. As stated above, it is generally advisable to plow stubble ground early in the fall. ist. The weeds which have started will be prevented from seeding and the weed seeds will be brought near to the surface where they will germinate and be killed by frost before seeding. and. This second growth of volunteer of oats, weeds, etc., will protect the ground during the winter and keep the soil from blowing. The late fall plowing has no such second growth and blows worse in the winter. 3rd. There is more spare time for the work. If the stubble ground is leit for late fall plowing it is apt to crowd the plowing of the sod over into the spring, which is bad practice generally. The reasons for plowing sod ground in the late fall are: 110 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Ist. It gives us the benefit of late summer pasture, and in case of clover a second crop for seed or for turning under to enrich the ground. 2nd. It is the best possible place to spread the barnyard manure, as there is least danger of washing or leaching. 3rd. The ground can be much better prepared and with less work than when plowed in the spring. 4th. There is much less danger of damage irom cutworm and other insects. It may sometimes be advisable to leave some ground for spread- ing manure during the winter. In this case it better be the clover sod rather than the timothy or the bluegrass. Where clover is seeding with the oats or barley for fertilizing pur- poses or where rape is sown in the oats for fall feed it will of course be necessary to plow late in the fall. BETTER ATTENTION TO FALL PLOWED GROUND. The fall plowed ground is generally neglected in the spring and left to dry out and the weeds are left to get a good start, robbing the ground of moisture and food. Not only should the fall plowing be disced as soon as the oat seeding is over, but the corn stalk ground as well. When corn stalk ground is disced early in the spring the moisture is saved, the stubs and stalks are cut up and mixed with the soil and as a consequence bother less during the cultivation, and a better seed bed is secured. If not disced, the surface is turned to the bottom of the furrow in a lumpy condition, where neither the harrow, disc or cultivator can reach it. SPRING PLOWING. We often abuse our spring plowing by turning it up to the sun and ciry winds to bake and dry out, depending on a shower to mellow up the ground at planting time. It is a good rule never to leave the field either at noon or at night without first harrowing the ground that has been plowed. In my esti- mation no ground can be properly prepared, giving a good seed bed for corn without the use of the disc. A half prepared seed bed means a poor stand and an uneven growth and the corn will suffer more from drouth and from insects. DEPTH TO PLOW. What is known as deep plowing is generally not advisable in the corn belt, although the loose soils and bottom lands may be plowed much deeper than the black prairie soils with less danger of bad results. There CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. tit is seldom any advantage in plowing more than six inches deep either in spring or fall. If ground is to be plowed deeper than formerly it should be done in the fall. On heavy soils the bad effects of too deep plowing are often apparent for several years. TOO DEEP PLANTING. Too deep planting is especially bad when the seed is weak, and the spring cold and backward. When the ground is not well prepared or is very mellow there is danger of putting the seed down four or five inches, when two inches would be better. Especial care should be taken in case of early planting when the ground is still cold. I know of several cases last spring where the same seed was planted in two different fields, giving a good stand in one case and a very poor stand in the other. Investigation showed that the poor stands were due to deep planting. Corn is generally planted deeper than we think. The planter wheels frequently sink into the ground two or more inches and the corn is covered another two inches. The planter tracks are then filled by harrowing and the corn is often more than four inches deep. We often watch the planter carefully for a few rounds when we start the planter and then pay no more attention to the depth of the planting. The soil is generally mellower as we get away from the head land and consequently the corn is planted deeper than we supposed. STRAIGHT ROWS AND EVEN CHECKING. The yield of corn is often reduced and the work of cultivation made difficult and slow, because of carelessness in handling the planter. Un- even checking may be due to several causes. In the case of short fields we generally draw the wire too tight and the planter checks too quick both ways. On long fields we are apt to check ahead owing to the slack of the wire, and this is especially true where the tongue of the planter is raised too high and the team fast. In the case of irregular shaped fields, the checking is frequently bad. This is especially true where the ends of the field are not at right angles with the rows. In this case there will be a jog every four rows, de- pending on how much the field is out of square. Carelessness in setting the anchor is the cause of much poor check- ing. It is a common practice to draw the wire to about a certain tight- ness at both ends of the field. -It is a much better plan to always set the anchor on line at one end of the field, while at the other end the anchor should be drawn to a certain tightness. 12 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. CULTIVATION. It is not possible at this time to go much into details, and of course methods will vary greatly with local conditions, but there are a few things of importance often overlooked. Many think that there is nothing more to do after the corn is planted for two weeks until it is up and large enough for the “first cultivation.” There are others who believe in harrowing and even in cultivation before the corn is up, but on account of the pressure of work, neglect it. Where ground is left in this manner for two weeks and often longer, it becomes foul with weeds, which take up moisture and plant food and make it difficult to work the corn. The ground is packed by the rains and baked by the sun, until it becomes hard and dry; that is, “out of condition.” It is especially important in the case of corn that it should not be stunted when young, as it never fully recovers even under the most favor- able conditions. We should keep a good, mellow, lively tilth until the corn shades the ground, preventing the rain and sun from beating upon it, making it hard, dry and mealy. The time to kill weeds is before they come up and before they have deprived the corn of moisture and nourishment. Where it is possible to do so it is a good plan to cultivate the corn cnce before it comes up, following the planter with the harrow. If the piece is small so that the cultivation can be finished before the corn breaks through the surface, it is well enough to wait until the field is all cultivated and then cross it with the harrow instead of following close behind the cultivator. However, in the case of large fields, it is best to follow the cultivator with the harrow. It is a common practice with some to harrow corn after it is up, but I prefer to cultivate and harrow as described above and especially on corn stalk ground. Even on stubble ground the harrow does con- siderable damage to the young corn. No one can afford to do less than to thoroughly harrow the ground before the corn comes up. It is a serious mistake to let our corn ground once get out of condition in the spring. It is also a very common mistake to cultivate shallow when the corn is small and lay it by with a deep cultivation. The reverse would be more profitable. There is little danger to the roots from deep cultivation the first time, and there is great advantage in going deep enough to secure a good mulch. a CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 113 The following cultivations should be no deeper than is necessary to keep the ground clean. Many cultivate corn as though the roots went straight down instead of spreading out through the surface of the soil. It is very essential that we disturb the roots as little as possible when the corn is “laid by.” We are very apt to feel that as this is our last chance at the corn, we must give it a “good laying by,’ and especially if the weeds have gotten a start. IMPORTANCE OF THE PROPER CARE OF SEED CORN. . (M. F. Miller, in Circular of Information No. 19, Missouri Agricultural College.) The low vitality of much of our seed corn is due to the fact that it is improperly cared for during the fall and winter months. If the corn is not thoroughly dry by the time hard freezing weather comes, its vitality is sure to be injured. It makes little difference how low the temperature may fall if the corn is perfectly dry, but any hard freezing when the corn is damp will weaken its vitality and even prevent the germination of many kernels entirely. It is usually thought that if corn comes up, the vitality has not been injured, but experiments have shown that corn stored in the crib will not only produce less vigorous sialks than those from corn that has been properly cared for but will fail to make as much corn per acre under exactly similar circumstances, the difference running from 4 to 16 bushels per acre, depending on the season. ‘These figures should convince any one that the proper care of seed corn offers one of the simplest and most important means of in- creasing corn yields. If we allow an increase of 5 bushels per acre (it will usually be much more than this) on a crop of 50 acres, the extra yield would amount to 250 bushels which at 35 cents is worth $87.50. ‘The extra time necessary to properly care for the seed would not. be over a day and the expense of putting up drying racks is very trifling, as they may be made of any sort of lumber. Plant Corn of Strong Vitality—vThe failure to plant corn of strong germinating qualities is undoubtedly responsible for the greater number of poor stands of corn. The matter of getting a uniform distribution cf seed is but secondary to the more important factor, that of planting enly corn which is known to be of strong vitality. Germination tests which have just been made at the experiment station with a number of samples of corn from farmers’ cribs around Columbia, show an average germination of but 6344 per cent. This means that there will be a great deal of corn in the State this spring of weak vitality, and unless proper A—8 114 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. precautions are taken to test such corn before planting, very poor stands will certainly result. If only corn of strong vitality were planted, with due consideration to securing a uniform distribution of seed, the stand on average seasons should not run much under 95 per cent. Such a stand means a long step in the direction of a profitable corn crop. Test the Vitality of Corn in a Germinating Box.—lt is perfectly practical for the average farmer to test for germination every ear of corn he plants, and where corn has not been carefully preserved this should always be done. It has been found that if an ear is lacking in vital- ity, the character is shared to a great extent by the majority of the kernels on that ear; consequently if a half dozen kernels are selected from dif- ferent parts of the ear and tested, a very good idea of the strength of germination of that particular ear may be obtained. The method oi doing this is as follows: Lay out the ears selected on a long board or on the crib floor, marking a number opposite each. Prepare a box twa Figure 2. Germinating Box. The cloth on which the sand is placed is rolled back to show the squares holding the corn. or three inches deep and two or three feet square (Fig. 2) nailing the bottom on tightly in order that it will not warp when it becomes wet. Place in the bottom of the box a half to three-quarters of an inch of sand aud moisten thoroughly. Cut a piece of white cloth to fit the box and mark it off with a pencil into squares 2 to 2% inches in size, numbering them from one up, laying the cloth on the sand. Now remove two CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION, 115 kernels about two inches from the butt of ear No. 1, turn it one-third around and take two more from near the middle, again turn it one-third around and remove two from near the tip, placing the half dozen kerneis in square No. 1. In like manner take the same number of kernels from ear No. 2 and place in square No. 2 and so on until all the squares are filled. Cover the corn with another piece of moist cloth, which is somewhat larger than the box, filling in on top of this with three-quarters of an ~ inch of moist sand. A piece of oilcloth or some wet paper thrown over the top helps to keep the germinator from drying out. Set in a warm place, say near the kitchen stove where the temperature will stand from 70 to go degrees, and allow it to remain about a week, moistening the sand occasionally if necessary and noting the progress of germination from time to time. At the end of this time the kernels of good vitality will have sprouted strongly and one can tell by looking at the different squares which ears are to be discarded for seed. For instance, if ear No. 10 shows a tendency to weak germination, or if one or more of the kernels failed to sprout at all, such an ear should be thrown out. It will be tound in ordinary crib corn that a large per cent of the ears will have to be discarded entirely. The ordinary practice of planting such ears is responsible for most of our poor corn stands. The time necessary to do this testing is very trifling compared to the money return which it will bring. By such a test, if one is depending upon the crib corn for seed, a most conservative estimate is that the stand may be increased five per cent which should mean two bushels more corn per acre, where the average yield is 40 bushels. The actual time necessary to test sufficient corn to plant 50 acres in this way is not over two days and a little figuring will show at once the income which such work will bring. The germinating box costs practically nothing and if one wishes, several may be run at once. Probably the most con- venient size is one two feet square, which will test about one bushel of corn. Another method of arranging this germinator is to use instead of the sand, layers of wet paper, or sometimes bran is used, but the sand is probably the most satisfactory. It should be said that where very careful attention has been given to drying out and preserving the seed corn it should test as high as 95 per cent of the kernels germinating strongly. In such a case it will probably not be necessary to test each individual ear that is planted, but rather to test say ten kernels from fifty representative ears. Some test, however, should always be made before planting, to be sure that the corn is of strong vitality. 116 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. . 3) % . % F a Lf'e uy oy on% By PARAS” rasOND oP ati a 58 Od nts mt TT] [\ 0D i Li ay? ine te 6) "| , q : anny gan 0 im i \y i +h i v fay : Oy Ante fa 3116) nT No Yi ene 33 99933 bebe aN Hd 1] 999810397 I] i i matt wt wa ian 0 | ih sl 9009993 1) Sant: ag hn ai) 97 bk} p nD : i er ft TT 7m 1M, {) [eX = 2S=s: ae eS = 4 ae = ad 39980093912) aN BL ¢ ont Wi 038 G83 019 Naa gaan ana Atel Y Y, 06 g i g none pAN BANANA B vy NU it mf y fC a 0 ) 3 bs) OF any aii G08 a0 i Aa ie x \e 1 Ears showing variation in the shape and size of kernel Methods of Preserving Strong Vitahty.—The best method of pre- serving corn is to spread it out in shallow layers or in small piles in some well ventilated room until dry, then transfer it before freezing weather to a dry room where a moderate temperature is maintained throughout the winter. If such a room is not available, build a series of rough board shelves or open racks in any well-ventilated room where the corn will dry out rapidly and remain dry. Another method is to hang the corn on binder twine or wire ina dry room. (A good seed corn rack is made ot 2 by 4 uprights upon which are nailed I by 2 inch strips to hold the ° corn. ) Corn should never be piled in large piles or placed in tight barrels or boxes until perfectly dry, neither should it be placed when moist in a warm room, as in either case the vitality is liable to be injured by a tendency to heat or sprout. Again, corn which is thoroughly dry, if CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 117 subjected to a moist atmosphere, may absorb water in sufficient amounts to be injured by a hard freeze. It is never desirable, therefore, to store corn over a stable because of the moist air arising from the stalls. Any method by which the corn is dried quickly and kept dry will maintain its vitality. CHARACTER OF GOOD SEED EARS. There are certain characteristics in ears of corn which indicate high yields per acre and which the corn grower should observe in selection. Some of these are based on the observations of both practical and scien- tific men, others are more or less theoretical. We must maintain certain ideals if we are to improve our corn as we have improved our live stock. It will be understood that the purpose for which corn is grown will in- fluence largely the ears to be selected but the characters mentioned here are those which deal simply with yield of shelled corn per acre. Shape of Ear.—The best shape for an ear of corn is as nearly cylin- drical as possible. This is desirable for two important reasons. In the first place, a tapering ear usually means a less amount of shelled corn to the cob, than if the ear is cylindrical; it means either shallow grains near the tip or the dropping out of rows, neither of which is desirable. The second reason for selecting cylindrical ears is that such an ear bears kernels of nearer uniform shape and size than the tapering ear, thus giving a more even distribution of the seed by the planter. It will be understood that ears perfectly cylindrical can rarely be found but those that are nearly cylindrical are the ones to select. Proportions of the Ear—vThe proper proportion of length to cir- cumference in an ear of corn is about 4 to 3, or the circumference should be 34 the length; that is, an ear 10 inches long should be 7% inches around at a point one-third the distance from butt to tip. It is rarely de- sirable therefore to select the longest ears that can be found, neither is it wise to select the shortest ones, when shelled corn per acre is wanted. It is a common opinion among farmers that the very long ears are best, but the experience of corn breeders has not shown this to be true when a series of seasons is considered. Where the corn is to be fed on the stalk it may sometimes be advisable to select the shorter ears when two occur on a stalk, but this would not apply to the case where a high yield of marketable corn per acre is the object. Space Between Kernels—It is rarely desirable to select corn with wide spaces between the rows either at the tips of the kernels, or at the base next the cob. The space between the various kernels in the indi- vidual row should be small, so that the ear will be solid and compact. The flint varieties of the northern part of the United States show the 118 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. wide-furrowed character, but for Missouri we should select the more compact ears, ears in which there is just as little lost space as possible. Reference to the photograph will show what is meant by wide and narrow furrows between rows. ‘The ear on the right shows very wide furrows, the one in the middle a medium width and the one to the left very nar- row space between the rows. | Butts and Tips——The butts and tips should be well filled out with deep regular kernels. This is important because it gives more corn to the ear. The characters of the butt are more important in determining the ears to select than those of the tip since they are capable of being transmitted with greater certainty. The tip of the ear is affected quite largely by season and soil conditions or it may be injured during pol- lination, thus preventing a proper filling out. f ry ee noreeee onan nt Eee Wyss Dons, ane poenen? ~ Bad. vy the WL mek ayy di Boe “<= if i TY noe OOUUOLLLE HooteN6 ip yy i bd od dd bu 0060000 Guaaaan f * DUGDIODOODODOD DED oopov0000090 0000 sai abt ava TOCRUOA NOG M v ~ 7 = (se | te | | —" —_ eS —4 = r—] c= —] —7 =] 4] i) La) | co 7 & a5 = > Gaus }909990 eee id be of el (Th a eS = 3S =) r—) rom J ec co esx — tJ =) | gs ee e2 €9 i es che} my aoddy 0009, 4 a) oe — | [— 1220 23 —") & es = | r— = cS 2a 2 — be | 2 eS 3 e> 2 =) = =) 3 —) 2 cS 3 — 2 —) = — i nh’ Baan WM EG 6 y GCoag0 ui fii UbSsdjITUUEE Dv be U ¥ i GG (00 iB G00b000 {; (000 FA0CI000) Nf OA G00, f Ears showing a variation in space between rows. The kernels at the butt should be uniformly and compactly arranged about a clean cup shaped depression, the diameter of the scar where the shank was attached being about three-fourths of an inch in diameter for ale at: CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 119 medium sized varieties. If the butt is too small and contracted, many of the ears will blow off or they will be knocked off in harvesting with ‘acorn binder. Too large a butt makes the shucking difficult and is an indication of poor breeding and careless selection. Well bred corn is usually shown by the character of the butts. of the ears. In Fig. 4 the middle ear shows the best butt. The one on the right is large and coarse, the one on the left too small. Figure 4. The tip on the left in the top row is ideal, the one in the middle is good and the one on the rightis poor. The butt on the leftis too small, the onein the middle very good, the one on the right poor. The cobs on the left are small, those in the middle are good, those on the right are too large. The tips should be as nearly covered with deep, well-formed kernels as it is possible to get them and still maintain an ear of proper length. A well covered tip is a character usually observed on the shorter ears; consequently if one selects primarily for covered tips there is danger of shortening the ears beyond a profitable limit. It is better to have a good 120 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. sized ear with a tip not completely covered, than a shorter ear with a covered tip. Of course if a well covered tip can be secured on an ear of the proper length that is ideal, but there are so few long ears which show this characteristic that it is usually impossible to secure enough of these for seed. It is therefore better to select for deep, regular kernels well out to the end of the ear than for kernels over the end of the ear. For show corn, however, the more nearly covered the tip, providing the length is maintained, the higher the score. In Fig. 4 the tip on the left is ideal, the one in the middle is good, the one on the right rather poor. Size of Cob.—The prevailing opinion among farmers is that the smaller the cob the better. In general this may be said to be true, al- though there is a limit beyond which it is not profitable to go in the matter of reducing the size of the cob. It has been well said that the cob bears much the same relation to the ear of corn as does the bone to the beef animal. The animal must not be coarse boned, neither must it be fine boned, a medium hone of clean quality being much preferred to either. Likewise in corn we should select for a medium sized cob rather than for a large or very small one. Large cobs usually mean shallow grains and a coarse appearance. They do not show high quality. A very small cob tends to narrow pointed chaffy grains which are very often loose on the cob and uniformly lacking in vitality. What is wanted is a goodly number of straight, well compacted rows and sufficient cob must be maintained to bear them. In Fig. 4 the middle ears show the best sizes of cobs, the ones on the left being too small, those on the right too large. Shape of Kernels——The proper shape of a kernel is one a little over one and one-half times as long as wide, of a straight, wedge shape, but not pointed. It should be of good thickness and while not wide at the end next the cob, it should still be well shouldered out, giving room for a strong, plump germ. In the accompanying photograph the two rows of kernels at the top are poorly shaped, those in the top row being too shallow and those in the second row too long and slim. The shallow ones will give a low per cent of corn to the cob while the long slim ones in- dicate weakness and low vitality. The two rows near the middle show the best shapes. They differ somewhat in appearance but represent very well the characters to be observed in selection. The kernels in the lower row show a difference in size of germ. Large germs are desirable in seed corn for two reasons; first, because such kernels usually have strong vitality and second, because they have a higher feeding value. A large proportion of the oil in the kernel is found in the germ so that the larger the germ the higher the per cent of oil. By noticing a num- CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 121 The two upper rows show poor shapes of kernels, the two rows near the middle are good shapes, and those in the lower row different sizes of germs. ber of ears it will be found that while there is often quite a difference in the size of the germs in the kernels of the same ear, yet as a rule they tend to uniformity in size, some ears having large germs, some medium and some small. It is well, therefore, to select ears which show large strong germs, especially when the corn is being selected for a breeding piot. EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING Improved Live Stock Breeders’ Association (Convened in Agricultural College, Columbia, January 12 and 13, 1905. Held under the auspices of the State Board of Agriculture.) Abstract of Addresses Delivered PRESIDENTS ANNUALAADDEESs: (Benton Gabbert, Dearborn, Mo.) We have in our program some subjects that will be a delicious treat coming from practical men engaged in the calling they propose to dis- ‘cuss. The life of a meeting of this kind is in the exchange of ideas; in the discussions of the papers presented; and in the discussion of the methods and manner of doing things. It is the doers and not the theorizers that have the public ear and the public confidence in these strenuous times. The doers—the men that make a success, are the ones we want to hear from, and the man in this company who remains silent when he knows or wants to know something is injuring himself and others. At our last annual meeting the papers read were hopeful. I thought we had reached bedrock in low prices for pedigreed stock, but I find that the four beef breeds have this year lowered the record fully one- third from last year, and more than two-thirds from 1902. This is a statement from the Breeders’ Gazette of cattle sales. AVERAGE NUMBER OF CATTLE SOLD AT EACH SALE. 1904 1903 1902 Name of Breed. Numberof cattle sold at each Number of cattle sold at each Number of cattle sold at each sale. sale sale. Shorthorn:,.... %.<.-. eos siees 42 50 57 ELONGLONGs.7-5 cr cae citecsee wee 51 67 83 PATTI ag ecto aia criote iat eee ree 44 74 - 62 LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION, 123 COMPARATIVE AVERAGES BY YEARS. . 1904 | 1903 | 1902 Name of Breed. | No. of| No. Av’e |No. of| No. | Av’e |No. of| No. |” Av’e sales. | sold. | price. | sales. | sold. | price.|sales.| sold. | price. HOLDHOM Wes 2.) 24-22 cce see 65 | 2755. |$101 25 89 4474 |$L74 15 120 6152 | 3260 40 FUGTOLOLG Gers a0 feces. = eee 28 1481 | 117 10 30 2029 | 172 50 31 2597 265 70 Aberdeen-Angus.......... 5 21 962 | 132 80 14 1041 | 220 15 17 1065 209 £0 Galloway cs ncowesewessccm. 3 133 | 143 55 3 161 116 10 3 206 185 15 Rolled; Purhams:.-.-..2.<.2.- 7 286 | 100 00 8 282 | 155 55 5 159 21 95 FROORE Ollerton civistor sie eseie’s Oe: i 48 70 00 1 22 | 145 00 2 149 248 09 ‘From this statement we see if they fall in the same proportion for two more years thoroughbred cattle will be below cost of production for breeding purposes. John Stuart Mills, the great political economist, lays down a rule, that holds good in most cases—that supply and demand regulate prices—that when an article falls in price below the cost of pro- duction, production will fall away until profitable prices are reached. The sales above would prove that the sales of registered cattle have di- minished in numbers to correspond to fall in prices. This falling in num- bers would indicate one of two things: either the cattle have remained in the herds, or have found some outlet to other markets. I think the latter is the case. I believe that the prudent breeder is pruning down his herd by sending to the shambles the undesirable breeding stuff ; retaining the cream for future use. So the darkest cloud has its silver lining. If we cannot improve at low prices the scrub herds of the farmer and ranchman we can improve our thoroughbred herds by judi- cious culling. No thermometer has yet been found that will apply to registered cattle. If the public were thoroughly awakened to the fact that a thoroughbred sire would add twenty per cent to the value of their scrub herd the demand for blooded sires would increase, when cattle at the stock yards fell in price. But the thoroughbred seems to be at the long end of the pendulum, when beef cattle rise the thoroughbred rises too high, when beef cattle fall the thoroughbred falls too low. But one potent fact is eliminated from the fall and rise in cattle; that the butcher’s block is the seal test. The sales of high grade steers at the markets is more eloquent for good blood than all the breeder shows, and the strongest advertisement for thoroughbred herds for the year 1904, and to the intelligent feeder will bear fruit for a future harvest, and create a market for pure bred sires among the men who raise the stockers. The packers are the basic cause of the rise and fall in prices for our 124 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. registered cattle. Consumption has but little to do with the price, for the price paid for cattle on foot has no relative ratio to the price the re- tailer sells to the customer, or the price the ‘retailer pays to the packer. The long headed packer, years ago, studied out the problem that the private butcher was a menace to his business and by a systematic freez- ing out process eliminated the butcher. But one fact now remains to keep the packer from having absolute control of the markets, both in buying and selling, and that one factor is organized labor. Whether the unions are a blessing or a curse to the cattle raiser and feeder is an unsolved problem. Cattle last year just before the strike were slowly advancing and all who were interested in raising or feeding cattle were hopeful that the cattle business was coming back to a paying basis. The strike was peculiar. The skilled workmen were satisfied with their wages, but in a spirit of brotherly kindness, at the expense of the ackers, they demanded higher wages for the unskilled laborer. The packers naturally refused. Then the tie-up in business. The packers could take but a limited supply, could not fill their orders, consumption fell off, people found that they could live without meat and feel good on a, cheaper ration, but this state of affairs hurt the cattle raisers and cattle feeders in the pocket book, the most sensitive and vital part of business. The unions lost out, for public sentiment was against their generosity for their fellow laborers, in calling out their men to help force the packer to pay, not them, but their unskilled brothers higher wages, and the union of skilled labor getting the honor for the generous deed, put me in mind of a story related by Rabelas. A cook was roasting a goose in a little alcove on the street. A laborer passing along at the noon hour and seeing the warm grate and smelling the rich flavor of the goose, took out a large loaf of bread, his only dinner, and would break off a piece and hold it over the goose. The fragrant vapor both warmed and flavored his dry bread and he enjoyed the comforts. When he had finished his meal the cook demanded pay, but the laborer refused. Why, he said, the vapor was floating away and was of no account to you. But said the cook, did it not help your bread? Yes, replied the laborer, but I have not wronged you. While they were disputing a crowd gathered. Finally the cook said that they would leave the case to be settled by the town fool—both agreed. We have such a one in every town. We call him the town wit or wag. You have all met him. One who sees the comic side even in tragedy, and turns the most sorrowful woe into a smile of joy; one who-sees the truth in a cloud of bog and can scien- tifically turn on the X-ray. Well, says the wit to the laborer, you got the vapor from the goose, it flavored and warmed and moistened your dry bread and made it eat good. Yes, responded the laborer. — LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 126 x Have you a coin about you, asked the wit. Yes, said the laborer and handed him a new coin. The wit went up to the metal counter and rang the coin. “Is that good money?” he asked the cook. “Yes,” re- sponded the cook. “Well, you are paid,” said the wit. The laborer has had the vapor of your goose and you have had the ring of his coin. In the case of the strike the packers had the vaporings of the union and the strikers failed to get even the ring of the coin, and the cattle raisers and feeders suffered more or less than either. We undoubtedly held the bag. Before leaving this subject of the packing industry, I would ask my hearers if they have not read two articles published in Wallace’s Farmer of December 22 issue, to get the paper and read them. One is by ex- Governor Larabee on the railroads and the other by A. L. Ames, presi- dent of the Meat Producers’ Association, both of lowa. The former emphasizes the fact that competition can no longer be depended on to regulate freight rates. That the government must have the power to regulate the freight rates, or the government must own the roads. He says no other, even half civilized country, would tolerate such high- handed robbery, as less than half a score of irresponsible persons dictate and control the traffic and tax every business for their profit. We know that the greatest bar to distributing our thoroughbred cattle is the ex- cessive freight rates imposed. At the World’s Fair the good lot of cattle sold by the different breeders was discounted in price fully one-fourth by the buyers having to pay such excessive terminal charges to get the cattle from the fair grounds to the roads over which they were to be shipped home. Mr. A. L. Ames speaks of the longer time it now takes to get beef cattle shipped to market and the rebates that Swift and Armour get in their shipments, proving that the two, the transportation and packing companies are in collusion to collect tribute from the shippers. The shrinkage in these dilatory hauls takes money out of the shipper’s pocket and puts it in the packer’s safe. This all proves that the breeder has other work to look after besides raising good stock. We now ask the question pertinently, is there any sentiment in business traffic, commerce or trade, or any other name you may call the distribution of products? I assert that the golden rule or the decalogue has little place in modern business methods. I know I may be censured as strongly as was Senator Ingalls of Kansas, in his travesty on modern politics, yet the history of the industrial world bears me out in my as- sertion. It seems to be every fellow, or combination of fellows for themselves, and the devil take the hindmost. It is war to the knife and from the knife to the hilt. Why are the agriculturists com- 126 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. ing to the front? Why are the hayseeds of the past becoming the gentlemen farmers of the present? Becattse his products feed and clothe the world. Because his products form the basis of manufactured goods. Because the balance of trade is alone kept on the right side of the ledger by the exportation of his products. The transportation com- panies would have to quit business, the railroad stocks would go begging and Wall street would be in sack cloth and ashes, and yet they pinch us and rob us and despoil us. The old adage is indeed a truism, “if the farmer prospers all the world prospers.” We want the world to pros- per, but fair play is no robbery. All we ask is fair play. We do not want to be held up for all the traffic will bear. We ask that the inter- state commerce commission be given power to regulate rates; that they may act as umpire between the colossal corporation and the smallest shipper. If we ask for bread they will give us a stone, but if we de- mand it as our right, and insist on our rights, the gentleman farmer will get them. From 1888 to 1898 the commissioners exercised the right as they understood the law to enforce their decisions, but some shrewd cor- poration lawyer brought a test case before the Supreme Court and our highest tribunal decided against the commissioners and the people and for the railroads. Since then the commissioners have been powerless, only to suggest, and it leaves the people at the mercy of the railroads, and although, as ex-Governor Larabee says, the people have paid tribute to the railroads above a legitimate price, to make the people the virtual owners of the roads, and we believe this statement is true, for the rail- roads have ever and always issued bonds to build the roads, at a rate of interest that insured the selling of the bonds for cash, with which they built the roads and bought rolling stock. The excessive tribute wrested from the people has paid the bonds, and the roads have_ re- capitalized their stock, or in common parlance, watered their stock four- fold beyond its actual cost, and the end is not yet. But some may not think this a legitimate subject for the President of the Missouri Fine Stock Breeders’ Association, but the whys and wherefores of the unpre- cedented fall in pedigreed cattle leads us to seek the cause, and to demand a remedy. We have been hewers of wood and drawers of water in the years agone. Now we demand equal rights for all, especial privileges to none. The corn growers have been entertaining and instructing us. . se a.nd bee 58 642.7 4 28 -258 7 54 be Corn meal 4, 2round Obs... scutes: oak cee ce .65 621.5 4 06 . 296 5 96 ee SOOT A, Peele eae ol sok 6 ah ee eae eee 91 492.1 314 412 20 92 Ba OORM Ard COD MEAlist).c-acanncceneaceuss owes 32 94. | 4 81 *2r | « Deen nated 1.6.5. 04220509, .15 kcal edhe 755 | 065.6 | 353 | 4-298 LOR FSORIOG. COMN,..A.uet rela cede ide atoll o meee 63 | 577.7 3 10 36 BLE, SIOEN, | HOC TABANy 5 oc ono ak doo ueGN Genny cane 45 «| . 656.0: | 355 317 Meet HS MOLLEGY COPM cadre 65.00 tees gel oes eae eT 405 | 693.2 3 71 30 LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 143 In this group of a number of supplemented rations and rations of corn alone prepared in various ways, we have a comparison of quite a number of feeds on the same basis, and it gives us a good chance to measure one with another. The conditions here were just the same. We sorted these hogs very carefully so that the gains would represent the comparative value of the feed. They were common hogs, not well- bred ones. They weighed 118 pounds each when they went on feed. They were ied for ninety days in small pens with no green feed and no earth to root in. This was strictly dry-lot feeding. Corn meal, five parts to one of oil meal made the best gains. Twenty parts of corn meal to one of oil meal made a somewhat smaller gain at a somewhat greater expense in grain and a slightly greater expense in dollars when we fed corn at 30 cents a bushel and oil meal at $24 a ton. One ton of oil meal in ration No. 1, which is the five to one ration, saved $49 worth of corn. 1 get at that figure by comparison with lot 9 where corn meal alone was fed. In that lot we made slightly more than ten pounds of pork per bushel, about what the average farmer makes, so there is nothing wreng about using that. You will all admit that ten pounds to the bushel from corn alone is about what you can figure on. The $24 worth of oil meal saved us $49.01 worth of corn. In the second lot, it saved $90.42 worth of corn. The oil meal in the smaller proportion saved more corn per pound of tts own weight than in the larger proportion. It has a slight medicinal value and when used in small amount its value as a condiment exceeds its value as a food. The cheaper pork was made where the larger amount of oil meal was fed. In the first lot, the corn, figured at 30 cents a bushel, was worth 49.6 cents. In lot 2, it was worth 44.8 cents. Lots 3 and 4 were fed on corn meal and middlings. The smaller proportion of middlings had a greater value per pound than the larger proportion. The smaller amount adds more palatability per pound of its weight than the larger one, and palatability counts. In a general way, it means digestibility. To lots 5 and 6 we fed oats with the corn. Comparatively speak- ing, there was.no profit in it. I figured oats at 20 cents a bushel cor- responding to 30 cents per bushel for corn. It took an enormous amount of grain per hundred weight gain, and the cost of pork, while it was only $2.75 with the corn and oil meal, was $4.28 and $4.06 with the two rations of corn and ground oats. It looks as though the fewer such oats as this one has in the ration, the better the ration is for fattening hogs. Oats are too bulky; hogs do not like them. A better grade of oats with a smaller amount of hull, would be more valuable for fattening hogs. If the hulls are removed oats are valuable i44 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. for hogs. A cheap grade of oatmeal that costs $28 per ton is worth while for show hogs, but not for fattening hogs. In lot 7 we fed wheat bran in the small proportion of one part to four parts of corn. It was not so good as the middlings ration of four parts of corn meal to one of middlings, but it was better than the corn alone fed to lot 9. It took 555.6 pounds of grain to make a hundred pounds of pork with the corn meal alone, compared with 492.1 with the corn and bran ration. So this small amount of bran has a value; it took 460.4 pounds with the corn and middlings (lot 4). Middlings are of somewhat greater value than bran. The corn and cob meal we had to grind three times to get it fine enough to feed to a hog and then it was not so fine as I would like to have it. I assumed that if I had had the right kind of mill I could have ground it at the same expense as corn, and that was giving an un- promising feed a very fine show. You see how it came out. The corn was worth 21 cents a bushel ground in this way when it had cost us 30 cents a bushel whole. I would not use that feed for any purpose. These were all ground feeds. We assume that corn costs us 30 cents a bushel, and that it costs us ten cents a hundred weight to grind it. The smallest gain was made on the shelled corn. If shelled corn is 30 cents a bushel, the corn meal (lot 9) was worth 37.4 cents. It: costs 5.6 cents at the mill to get it ground. With our gasoline engine at the farm, it cost us three cents a bushel for grinding. Grinding then, for dry lot feeding, according to these results is profitable. Soaking costs next to nothing. In this experiment it was worth six cents a bushel; where grinding is worth 7.4 cents, soaking is worth 6 cents. In lot 11 we fed bone meal with the corn and in ninety days each hog ate 6.2 pounds of the ground bone. That made the corn worth 31.7 cents per bushel. It is of some interest as it shows that the lack of bone food in corn is a real deficiency. Add the bone meal, which contains nothing but mineral matter and you increase the value of the corn. We do not need bone meal with anything but corn alone. A ration of mixed grains or roughage or milk or anything of that sort needs nothing of that kind. It is only needed when the hog is con- fined to a diet of corn alone. SUMMARY. We probably make the cheapest pork with corn and skim milk; next, I should say, comes corn and alfalfa pasture, then corn and clover pasture. Tutsey, 8913, bred and owned by Judge l. L. Frost, Mirabile, Missouri. Tutsey is out of a litter of 14 pigs far- rowed September 13, 1902, won championship prize in her class at American Royal in 1903, and although nourishing a litter of ten pigs during summer of 1904, won 7th place in her class at the World’s Fair. LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 145 In dry-lot feeding we make the most pork at the least expense at usual prices of feeds in Missouri, from corn fed with oil meal or tankage or wheat middlings. DISCUSSION. Mr. Laughlin—Is the cost per 100 pounds in Table II the cost of the grain and pasture, or simply the cost of the grain? Mr. Forbes.—Only the cost of the grain, the others are feeds to which we can not assign cash values. It is not a complete statement of the question, but if you try to assess a valuation to the green feeds, it is so arbitrary that it does not mean anything at all. Col. Waters.—What was the price of the milk? Mr. Forbes.—I have figured only on the price of the grain fed, and not on the milk. If you assume milk to be worth 18 cents a hundred weight, corn and milk would make the cheapest pork. This milk was ted in the proportion of three pounds of milk to one of grain. So far as the grain requirement is concerned, corn and milk will make much cheaper pork than corn and any kind of pasture. While we kept them on grass the daily gain was .71 pounds, on alfalfa it was .95, but on corn meal and milk it was 1.81. These pigs averaged 48 pounds in weight when put on this feed. They were fed 90 days. What I get out of that table is, if you can get skim milk, it is probably your cheapest feed to use with corn, and if you can get that, you don’t need anything else. Mr. King.—How can ‘you reach that conclusion unless you know what blue-grass and clover and alfalfa cost? Mr. Gabbert.—Alfalfa has as much market vaiue as corn. I have been buying some. Mr. Mumford—How much a ton green alfalfa is worth depends upon how much water there is in it. Mr. Forbes.—These figures have been computed on the basis of $3 a ton for all of these green feeds. That was so arbitrary that I left it out, but it leaves these figures in the same order. Mr. Laughlin—What was the price of the milk? Mr. Forbes.—Eighteen cents a hundred pounds. Mr. Frost.—What are your conclusions about tankage? Mr. Forbes.—With 30-cent corn and tankage, we ought to make pork for $3 a hundred weight. Some do not do so well as that, and some better. Suppose we figure $3 a hundred weight, with 30-cent corn as our standard. That is beyond what the average feeder does. A—10 146 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. I consider tankage valuable, and if you can get a high grade for $30 a ton it will be a profitable feed to use. But tankage does not always mean the same thing. There are scme packers, however, who make a uniform feed. I am not adver- tising any company, but the Swift tankage is a comparatively uniform product, and appears to be a superior preparation ior hog feeding. If you can get it for $30 a ton, it is worth the price. Mr. —————. When corn is worth 50 cents a bushel, what is your conclusion in regard to tankage? Mr. Forbes.—The figures in Table IV were on corn at 30 cents a bushel and tankage at $30 a ton. If you can buy tankage at $30 a ton, when corn sells for 50 cents per bushel, the tankage will be much better worth the price than in this experiment. While we are figuring on pork at $3 a hundred weight, with corn at 30 cents, do not assume on that account that our standard would be $4 a hundred weight with corn at 40 cents a bushel. We ought to do better than that. If you make pork at $3 a hundred weight from 30-cent corn, it is easier to make it at $4 from 4o-cent corn, and still easier to make it at $5 a hundred weight from 50-cent corn, because the feeds you use with corn do not increase in cost as the corn does in selling price. For instance, in Table V the wheat middlings will not double in value when corn does; they usually rise from $15 per ton to $20 per ton as the corn doubles in value as between 30 and 60 cents per bushel. The same is true with oil meal and all the feeds that you use with corn. They do not rise in price as rapidly as does corn. Mr. King.—Table I has made a very great impression on me as to the importance of feeding young stock and getting rid of it quickly. You tell us that there are two ways of making pork there, and that the slow way is the cheapest. Is that true of young stock? Mr. Forbes.—The increase in the expense of making pork as the hogs increase in age is not great until you get the hog fat. The great increase in the expense comes between 200 and 250 pounds. There is not a vast amount of difference in the cost of making increase at lower weights. Mr. King.—You have to have him a fat 200-pound hog in order to make any difference? Mr. Forbes.—A thin 200-pound hog will put on flesh with less expense than a fat one. Mr. King.—If when buying hogs I can buy 200-pound thin ones I can afford to pay more for them than the 200-pound fat ones, how about the fellow who sold them? Was it more expensive to raise the LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 147 thin 200-pound hog or the fat one? I am raising hogs, and I want to know which way I can make the most. Mr. Forbes.—The fat 200-pound hog costs more in the raising, but you do it more quickly and with less risk. Mr. Boies.—You cannot buy 200-pound thin hogs, unless by rare chance, now-a-days. Mr. King.—No, but I can raise them. Mr. Forbes.—If you want to turn your money quickly, feed fast. lf time is no object to you, feed more slowly, so as to get as much good as possible out of the pasture. Mr. King.—I have more blue-grass pasture than hogs to turn on it. What had I better do? Mr. Forbes.—Feed your hogs on the pasture. Mr. King—How about clover pasture? Mr. Forbes.—It is a better feed. Mr. Raine——Are you now feeding hogs from pigs, or from 200 pounds to shipping time, in what you have been giving us? Mr. Forbes.—Practically all of these were young pigs, being grown and fattened at the same time. Mr. Raine.—We have passed the age when we grow hogs to 200 pounds before we begin to fatten them. Mr. Frost.—Is not oil meal a dangerous feed for hogs? Mr. Forbes.—No; it is the one feed besides corn that I call a won- derful feed for hogs. Mr. Gabbert.-Oil meal is too high; it is worth $27 per ton. Mr. Forbes.—Yes, but look at corn! and at middlings! Middlings cost $20 a ton now, and oil meal at $27 a ton is much the cheaper feed. It was slightly cheaper when we made the figures in Table V, but it is much cheaper now. : Mr. Gabbert.—There are so many of these stock feeds on the market, is not oil meal the basis of all of them? Does not the value that is being attached to them belong to the oil meal? Mr. Forbes.—Yes, the oil meal at $24 a ton is ever so much cheaper than some of these at $150 a ton. It is a fact, and an interest- ing one, too, that it may possibly be worth the price that it costs in stock foods, if fed in small quantities. If you feed oil meal in very small quantities you will get enormous returns from each ton fed. There are people who believe in feeding patent stock foods, and if their belief is based on any evidence it is probably based on some such evidence as this. Mr. Gabbert.—They use in most of these feeds 50 per cent salt, and I think that is a good ration. 148 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Mr. Emmons.—How would it do to use cotton-seed meal instead of oil meal? Mr. Forbes.—I am experimenting with cotton-seed meal now. Mr. Emmons.—Don’t you think hogs will do well on a small per cent of cotton-seed meal? | Mr. Forbes.—I am trying to find out. So far as we know it is a poison to hogs. It is not good for calves. As a rule, I think it is the cheapest grain supplement to corn for older cattle. I am carrying out an experiment in feeding it to hogs, fermented. I expect these hogs to die as other people’s do, but they may not. Remember that ration No. 1 (Table V) is a balanced ration, and I fed that to growing pigs for dry-lot feeding. Mr. Boles—What is the best feed when they have the run of clover pasture? Mr. Forbes.—Then I would feed them corn, but in dry-lot feeding I would give them ration No.1. They do not like oil meal at first, but in a day or two they come to like it: Probably it will be more pala- table by mixing some middlings with it. Mr. Boles.——Do you make the slop thin? Mr. Forbes.—This was fed in a thick slop. Mr. ————-. Would not charcoal do as well as the bone meal used with lot 11, Table V? Mr. Forbes.—Probably not. It has a different composition and usefulness. Lime has a very slight value. Mr. Gabbert.—Hogs like lime, for some cause, Mr. Forbes.—There is more phosphoric acid in bone meal than in lime, and that is quite useful to hogs. Mr. Emmons.—What do you think of germ oil meal? Mr. Forbes.—I am testing germ oil meal, gluten meal, gluten feed and cotton-seed meal, oil meal and middlings on the farm now and will tell you the results next year. Mr. —————. Is feeding cob corn charcoal a detriment? Mr. Forbes.—I do not think it is. The cob contains some ash, a slight amount of potash and a very slight amount of phosphoric acid. Mr. Boles.—How do you think it would do to put concentrated lye in the slop? Mr. Forbes.—It would probably clean your barrel. Mr. Boles——And the hogs? Mr. Forbes.—Maybe it would. LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 149 Se BEST TYPE-OF COW FOR VEE MED DE Ey VV msi (W. P. Harned, Vermont, Mo:) Ever since the days cf Jacob and Rachael and the striped sticks in the watering trough, the cow question in some phase or other has been under consideration. From that early day down to the present the calf trade, the cow trade and the beef trade have flourished and grown. Our subject does not deal with the right or the wrongs of manipulating the trade in the finished product, but rather with the particular type of animal or class of machine that converts tite feed from the farm into this finished product. It is entirely proper to consider the domestic cow in the light of an economical machine moulded by man to manufacture milk, butter and beef from corn, grass and hay—the raw material— not forgetting that the cow is an animate machine susceptible to kind treatment, good care, and we believe, even affection. After all, how- ever, the whole problem is summed up in the text, “The Highest Class of Article With the Least Cost of Production.” Hence economy is the purpose and improvement is the method. With the changed conditions that have come about of higher land and higher labor and a denser population, I assume that the best type of cow for the middle states is the dual purpose cow; the real dual purpose in her improved form; a high class carcass of beef with a good supply of milk. She is the poor man’s cow and she is the cow for the average farmer. As land grows higher she becomes more and more a necessity and all the more valuable. It is still argued by some that such a type is not practical, and that the production of one is antagonistic to the development of the other. Be that as it may, this type has been pro- duced very successfully and is still among us, though not in as large numbers as the special purpose type. I cannot concede that the development of the real dual purpose cow is impractical and inconsistent, as we have living examples of animals that are high class at either purpose. One that has been illus- trated extensively of late in the live stock journals is Mr. Duthie’s White Heather, a cow that has won many first prizes,at the leading beef shows in England, while also beating all competitors at the great dairy tests. It will not do to estimate her a sport or freak, as she was bred for that purpose from ancestors of that stamp. Neither do I believe, as claimed, that the development of the 150 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. high class beef making quality is antagonistic to the cultivation of the real dairy quality. I do not consider the combination inconsistent with scientific breeding. In fact, it seems true at least in the Shorthorn breed of cattle that the two qualities go hand in hand and the one is interlinked with the other, for the best beef producing dams are the best milkers. There was a splendid illustraton of this point at the great International this year. Indeed, I once heard a noted Hereford breeder say that even his very best breeding cow gave a large supply of milk. The two greatest Shorthorn breeders in Scotland are strong advocates of the dual purpose in their cows, and it is known the non- milkers are weeded out. While I believe the combination cow is the best cow for the greatest number of farmers, it must not be claimed that any one type is best for all conditions under all circumstances in all localities. Wide as may be her sphere of usefulness localities and conditions may exist and do exist where the special purpose type is best adapted. For such a condition the roaming herds of the western plains might be cited, where calves are raised by the thousand and where the best attention that the cow receives is her own natural instinct. Beef is the prime object and the dairy quality is not considered and may even be objectionable as the cow cannot receive that attention neces- sary to a very heavy milker at calving, when the young born con- sumes but little. Under these conditions the special beef type is found and this is why the special beef breeds have grown popular on the range. As these immense herds grow less, and as the great pastures are cut up in smaller farms, where cultivation and cattle raising are com- bined, then the dual purpose cow finds a home. The real cow for the average farm or small farm should produce a high class beef animal which when weaned off can supply a good quality of milk and butter for use. Such is the ideal cow for the middle states and further east. Let her be good size, say 1400 to 1600 pounds, a gentle, quiet disposi- tion, a strong constitution, a good grazer, apt to fatten when dry and you have the ideal animal, a friend to the farmer. DISCUSSION—RAG WEED HAY. Mr. Gabbert—I know if I was going to a doctor for some disease I would go to a specialist for that disease. I would not go to some practitioner who professed to cure every ill. I believe if I was going to raise cattle I would want a distinct breed. I think it would take a good deal to make a good beef animal and a good milch cow at the LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 151 same time. You may find the desirable animal, but I think she would be limited in both points. I want Mr. Harned to make us another little speech. I want him to tell us about the “Missouri alfalfa.” For 24 years I have made a persistent effort to get the “Missouri alfalfa” (rag weed) off my farm and I have about succeeded, but all that time I did not know I was trying to destroy one of the best plants I had. I call on Mr. Harned to tell us about “Missouri alfalfa,” or rag weed. Mr. Harned—Now I may be able to offer my excuses by telling of other accidents that have happened. Many of you old, grey-headed men like our chairman, remember when the bran that was taken from the mills used to be dumped out into the river, and they even hired men to haul it away from the mills as manure, but now it is con- sidered one of the best feeds. It is the same with cotton seed meal. We know the cotton seed used to be thrown away in the South and men were hired to take it away from the gins. Now, I do not know whether my rag weed problem will turn out like that or not. I will teil you my experience about rag weed. I had cut forty acres of timothy hay one year. I generally stack the hay over the field where it is handiest. But that year I hauled the hay into a hay yard and stacked the stacks together. I was fixing to show a herd of cattle and I wanted some bedding. I had 25 acres of the fairest rag weed and happened to have the time and I had the boys cut the rag weed down and stack it for bedding. I happened to hit the right time before the stalks had gotten woody and we stacked the rag weed by the side of the timothy hay, and in the winter when I went to feed my hay, I turned my cows to the stacks instead of hauling the hay to them, and to my surprise there was not a bit of that hay ever touched until all the rag weed was gone. Col. Waters—Had it bloomed out before you cut it? Rag weed is very dusty when it gets in bloom. Mr. Harned—If the dust is a bloom, it should be cut before the dust comes. As good as I think it is, I think if you cut it at the wrong time, you have nothing. Mr. Mumford—Have you ever repeated that experiment? Mr. Harned—It turns out right every time if you cut it at the right time. I do not believe it will disappoint anybody, not even a cow. That happened in my younger days and I had not had much experience with five hundred dollar cows when I cut that rag weed hay. I had not had much then and have not had as much since as I 152 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. would like to. I think it was in the spring, February or March after I had wintered my herd on rag weed hay that I had my first $500 cow. The first season I stacked my rag weed with the hay, but I cut it another time, stacked it and hauled it out and put it in a rick and a man from Peoria, Illinois, who visited my farm was very much amazed and rather doubtful when I told him what it was. He walked up to the stack and said: “Is this alfalfa?”’—it was when alfalfa had begun to be talked of—I told him it was rag weed hay. It is the prettiest hay you ever saw when you put it up right. The man came away stunned from seeing my cattle eating it. He says: “What kind of Shorthorns have you got that eat old weeds?” Mr. Henderson—I cut a very weedy piece of new meadow last summer. It was more than half rag weed. I cured it and cast it abroad to horses and I noticed to my surprise that my horses and colts would deliberately take out the rag weed and eat it up clean before they ate the hay. It was allowed to cure thoroughly before it was scattered, and I do believe that it is a good feed. Mr, ————_J have been raising corn and feeding stock all my life and my first business was to try to get rid of rag weed. I made it a rule to send my hands over the field and chop out all the rag weed. I bought sheep to clean my pasture and kept my sheep mixed with the cattle. Now my sheep did not do as well after the rag weed was gone. [ put my sheep on meadows which had rag weed in them and I value a meadow with rag weed on it more than red top. I would give $2 more a ton for rag weed hay than for red top. It is no trouble to keep rag weed in the pasture, but I advise you to keep it out of the corn field. LEGISLATION NEEDED FOR THE PROTECTION OF MIS- SOUR LIVE SrOck, (Dr. D. F. Lucky, State Veterinarian.) Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen: In choosing the above subject I do not mean for you to infer that the present State laws pertaining to live sock are in any manner greatly deficient. In fact, I believe that we already have the most adequate set of laws for controlling contagious diseases of live stock to be found in the United States. Section 10547 authorizes the State Veterinarian or a deputy to place in quarantine any live stock which are capable of spreading a contagious disease, and requiring them Hereford Bull, ‘“Defender,’’ 140,037. First prize winner, two-year-olf Here- ford, St. Louis World’s Fair. Sweepstakes at Minnesota State Fair, 1903.. OWned by C. G. Comstock & Son, Albany, Missouri. 4 os y, mein! on f ‘aa e % "alles TA li tals SOE hi AES ea Pll ge ia Shorthorn Bull, ‘Choice Goods,’’ 186,802, grand champion prize winner St. Louis World’s Fair—greatest Shorthorn Bull in the world. Owned by Tebo Land and Cattle Co., Clinton, Missouri. ims LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 153 kept in ‘such a way as to prevent the disease from spreading from them. Section 10550 authorizes the quarantining of any infected premises, such as stockyards that have been occupied by scaby sheep or cattle, pens or stalls by horses affected with glanders, or pastures infested with fever ticks. his section also authorizes the veterin- arian to prescribe the mode of disinfection of such infected premises, and the disinfection must be thoroughly done before such premises may be used in connection with healthy stock. Section 10551 au- theorizes the Governor to issue a proclamation quarantining against any other state or territory in which any dangerous contagious disease of live stock is known to exist. Section 10552 authorizes the Gov- ernor to proclaim any municipality in this State under quarantine, and to prescribe rules under which stock may be removed from such locality. Section 2327 requires all hogs that die of a spreading disease to be burned or buried by the owner within 24 hours. Section 2322 forbids the importation, driving upon public highways, hitching or watering at a public place, selling or offering for sale any horses affected with glanders or nasal gleet. The latter term means any snotty discharge from the nose from whatever cause. Section 2330 forbids the importation into the State of any scaby sheep, and also prescribes against driving them on the public highway, selling or offering them for sale. Section 1166 requires railroad companies to furnish shippers of live stock cars that have been properly cleaned. Section 1167 requires the railroad companies to pay shippers for loss of live stock which die of contagious disease by reason of the non- compliance with section 1166. In addition to the above laws and some of minor importance that we already have we need to have passed as soon as possible a bill to authorize the controlling of dogs capable of spreading rabies, and another to require a standard of qualification on the part of those practicing veterinary surgery. Section 10547 of the present statutes uses the word “live stock,” and I am advised that dogs are not considered by the courts to be live stock, therefore, it would not be legal to quarantine a dog, even after he had developed rabies, much less quarantine the dogs through a neighborhood which have fought with and been bitten by a rabid dog. A law ought to be passed, and the sooner the better, authoriz- ing the State Veterinarian or his deputies or some local officer to place in quarantine, for at least two years, alf dogs that have had any chance whatever to be bitten by a rabid dog. Rabies is gradually be- coming more common in the State of Missouri, and it is high time the 154 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. disease be properly controlled. During the past few years I have been called to examine cattle and other stock which were affected with rabies, and have found in almost every case the rabid dog which caused the disease had fought with numerous dogs through the neighbor- hood. Such dogs as were exposed to the rabid dog were usually con- fined for about nine days and then turned loose without any further precaution. They should have been absolutely confined for at least two years, until the danger of their developing rabies had passed. It is no uncommon thing to hear of one of the exposed dogs going mad six months or a year after having been bitten, and in many cases after the visit of the rabid dog had been for- gotten. In two different towns I found in each as many as 65 dogs that, as far as we could tell, had been exposed to the rabid dog, many of them having actually fought with it. Under the present law it is not considered that the State Veterinarian has any authority to quar- antine or cause to be confined in any way such dangerous dogs. Some legislator who will take this matter up and provide a proper bill has a chance to do a good piece of work for the protection of the live stock of this State, and incidentally the human family. Almost as bad as the damage done by rabid dogs is that done by ignorant persons who profess to be veterinarians, and who are going about over the State offering their services to farmers who know far more about the diseases of live stock than they themselves, and charg- ing exorbitant fees for giving stock medicine which actually, in many cases, does more harm than good. The states of Iowa and [Illinois have already passed laws requiring veterinarians before beginning to practice to pass an examination. It seems that nearly all of those who by reason of incompetence were not allowed to practice in Iowa and Illinois have come to Missouri. The result is that the farmers of Missouri are afforded no protection whatever from such invaders. There are quite a number of competent, intelligent and honest veter- inarians practicing in the State of Missouri, but nothing like the number needed for the proper care of the live stock of this State. The number of ignorant quacks far exceeds the number of competent men, and the profession in the State today is judged largely by the ignorant members of the profession. The competent veterinarian, as I am glad to say, is gradually becoming understood and appreciated by the live stock producers of this State. He must have an education practically the same as is required to make a man a good medical doctor. I believe, in addition to this, that the veterinary practice re- quires more originality and native ability, inasmuch as the dumb brutes have a very feeble way of expressing their ills. LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 155 It is also essential that the veterinarian should be sober and hon- orable in his actions. I am so impressed with the needs of the live stock producers for better veterinary service that I have prepared a bill which I propose to ask some member of the legislature to intro- duce during the present session. Out of due respect for the constitu- tional rights for those who have engaged as much as three years in the veterinary practice for a livelihood the bill which I have prepared provides for them to register as veterinarians. It is provided for the graduates of veterinary colleges now practicing in the State to reg- ister. After January 1, 1906, the bill provides that all who begin to practice shall first pass an examination before the veterinary examin- ing board, which examination shall be strict enough to fully test the competence of the applicant. ‘The expense of the registration and holding of examinations shall be provided for by charging each appli- cant for registration a small fee, so that no money will be asked from the State treasury. I think this is one of the most important pieces of legislation from the live stock producers’ standpoint. It will result in better veterinary service, and will have a tendency to bring the profession up to its deserved position. It will especially be a great benefit to the State Veterinary department in controlling outbreaks of contagious diseases which occur over the State. I sincerely hope that the stock raisers will insist upon the passage of this law. Each farming community of the State ought to have one of its young men educated in veterinary surgery, and use him instead of the ignorant impostors who are so common today. [The bill regulating the practice of Veterinary Surgery referred to above passed ape Me Abeer and has been approved by the Governor, and is therefore While the appropriation of money for the veterinary work does not constitute new legislation, it is a matter with which the Legisla- ture deals every two years, and it is as important to have an ample appropriation made for the veterinary service as it is to have laws upon the statute books to provide for the controlling of contagious dis- eases. I believe that the live stock producers of the State ought to be in closer familiarity with the work in controlling contagious dis- eases, and not only insist upon the passage of laws, but upon the ap- propriation of a sufficient amount of money to properly care for the live stock of the State. Heretofore the funds provided for in the veter- inary service have not been sufficient. With the money provided the ordinary outbreaks of disease have been fairly well controlled. There is one important incident, however, which shows that the breeders of the State are not alive to the situation, and are not in all cases getting what is due them from the Legislature. For some two years 156 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. now hog cholera has been quite prevalent in many parts of the State of Missouri. I have received notices from the various public stock- yards of the receipt of 441 shipments of hogs from the State of Mis- souri which were affected with hog cholera. The disease began by the importation of stock-hogs into the State from the southern and western states to which to feed our enormous corn crop of 1902. Anticipating the outbreak of hog cholera I made a lecture on the subject at Palmyra at the first farmers’ institute that was held during the fall of 1902. The lecture was made on August 27, and gave the warning that the promiscuous importation of stock-hogs into the State would result in severe outbreaks of cholera among the hogs of the State, and advised that feeders be careful in the selection of stock- hogs, that they disinfect the car in which the shipment was made, and that such imported hogs be kept isolated and in quarantine for 30 days before being exposed to any other hogs. I furnished copies of this advice to all of the agricultural papers of the State, and to the market reports, in all of which it was published in full. The regular biennial appropriations were not sufficient to allow the veterinary service of this State to take hold of the situation as should have been done, and during the session of the Legislature of 1903 I asked for $6,000 extra appropriation with which to control hog cholera. I know of single counties that I could have saved ten times that amount if that appropriation had been made, yet when the attention of the members of the Legislature was called to this bill they simply passed it up without apparently giving it any thought. The breeders of this State ought to be in such close touch and sympathy with all veterinary and agricultural departments that when such a request is made of the Legislature that it would be promptly granted. I estimated that with an appropriation of $6,000 the hog cholera could have been controlled at that time. Since then the dis- ease has become so prevalent that its control is out of the question. A judicious expenditure of $100,000 during the next six months would not stamp hog cholera out of the State of Missouri. OUR CALLING. (S. P. Emmons, Mexico, Mo.) Good farming and good live stock; good reading and right living; these couplets will not only insure a competency in temporal things, a full storehouse here, but tend to give us an inheritance that is eternal LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 157 in the land beyond. Man’s success is not measured alone by the amount of his bank account; Columbus, Fulton, Morse and a host of others are not known for their pecuniary success. It matters not to us whether they died rich or poor, our legacy is the same. The great universities that dot the political centers of the states of great America are dependent largely on the material stream that flows from the large aggregation of wealth that surrounds them; but the end for which they are maintained would be lost were it not for the boy grown on the American farm. With the love of freedom born in his heart, with strong arm and active mind, and a brave heart he goes forth to fill the halls of our colleges, universities, the marts of trade, or the offices of the great transportation companies, ambitious to do the best services in any department he may fill. Go into the great metropolis of our nation, enter the banking, commercial and professional institu- tions. Who mans them? Seventy-five per cent of the founders and heads of these institutions are from the rural districts. The great stream of rural brawn and brain continues to flow, and must for years to come, into that boundless, busy field of responsibility, that must needs be filled by the very best material obtainable. The pur- pose of man is to do something, and that something to aid his fellow- man. The great west that so blesses mankind to-day would be a wilderness, were it not for the pioneer farmer, who for the cause of freedom and home, braved the storms and perils of the great un- known, and became the precursor of better things to come; then comes the live stock improver (the cause for which we stand to-day) disseminating the improved blood little by little until the great valley of the Father of Waters is known the world over for its wonderful progress. Flocks, herds, studs, shops and mills dot the greatest of alllands. ’Tis said the strength of the nation is in its homes and the best home is the rural home; there the owner is king and lord of all. Father, mother, children, there is no home without the combination. I know some of our great breeders have lived and died old bachelors, and some farm homes have existed without children, but they can- not have been ideal. Surely the man who builds up a great herd should have a life partner, one who shares his sorrows, sympathizes in his losses and exults in his victories, whether great or small. A farmer should have a farmer’s wife. Some city people are very much infatuated with rural life, but it’s only a fancy. They visit their country cousins and friends, and see nothing but the glitter and silver lining, and have no, conception of what labor, thought and energy was necessary to have gained and maintained these ideal rural homes. 158 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Our field for thought and obtaining knowledge is not limited. Do we wish a diversion, it is at our door. Combine with the study of producing the best live stock, the elements that enter into the soil, the crop best adapted, the fertilizations necessary both to maintain and supply the needed elements, the selection of the best seed, the quality of the seed needed in the selection of the foundation stock for the flock, the orchard and the field, and use of sires to maintain and increase the value of the flocks and the herds; the selection of the soil for the field and the garden, then combine with all this the most approved methods for the cultivation and with this all a love for the beasts that graze the field, and you have before you a life’s work worthy of the best efforts of man. Boys, do you want to leave the farm and enter mercantile pursuits? Remember ninety-five per cent fail; for every merchant prince, thousands have been made bankrupts. Would you prefer one of the professions and seek eminence through its channel? Remember there is “room at the top,” and few there be that get there. Is it your ambition to build your monument in the political field? Let me warn you the path is strewn with broken hopes, and yet the Presidency is not beyond the reach of those who till the soil. If our ambition leads us to reject the farm, the flock and the herd, to seek political fame, remember it’s the roughest and most uncertain road. We are re- minded of some of the greatest Americans, Henry Clay, Daniel Web- ster, John Jay, Thomas B. Reed, James G. Blaine, and many others, whose hopes were blasted when they were seemingly in reach of the topmost round. Would you abide on the earth and live to bless man- kind and the lower animals, whom God created for your benefit? Stay with the field, the flock and the herd. The improver of live stock is truly a benefactor; he who causes two blades of grass to grow where only one did live, and the cereals of the earth to double their former yield, is a double blessing to mankind, and history does not withhold her tribute to such. The grand old Scotchman, William S. Marr, had three sons, one a minister and the other a doctor, and the late W.S., Junior. I doubt if there is an American today who would have ever heard of them but for the venerable sage of Upper Mill. The monuments we build at the graves of our dead, are for naught but to keep our memory green, but the marble will have crumbled and the granite broken long before the names of Colling, Bakewell, Booth, Bates, Mainard, Ducie, Campbell, Cruikshank, Marr, Duthie and a host of these and others who developed different breeds of cattle, as well as all those who have bred and fed well, will have been forgotten. No, gentlemen, it is not only our privilege to write our names indelibly on the tablets of time, but to enjoy beyond measure LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 159 the fruits of our labor while here. The seed we sow, and the grass that we grow, is not only the main dependence of our life and comfort, at home, but the hope of the State, the nation and the world. We can do without some things, but the world would perish but for grass, and while the Isles of Great Britain produce the most luxuriant sward, it was left to the Great Valley of the Mississippi to produce the man whose genius laid that imperishable tribute at her shrine, with almost an immortal pen, and the name of Senator Ingalls shall survive as long as time shall last. Then do not make haste to leave so honorable a calling with so fruitful prospect of returns for honest toil and effort; let us inscribe on our banner the motto taken from one of our best farm papers, “Good farming, clear thinking and right living.” And may we fill this world so full of good, intelligent, useful farmers and breeders, that the very heaven shall be forced to prepare a field for our future usefulness. THE PUBLIC SALE AND THE PURE BRED STOCK BUSINESS. (Geo. P. Bellows, Maryville, Mo.) The close inter-relation of the public sale to the pure bred stock business is coming to be very generally understood, as evidenced by the steadily increasing number of auction sales of this class of stock annually being held. The public sale system of disposing of pure bred stock has grown amazingly in popular favor during the last decade. The increase in the number of auction sales during this period has not been the result of a mushroom growth, but has been the natural unfolding of legitimate causes, the results of which have been of untold benefit to the farmer. Since the farmer is engaged in the most important business or occupation known to man, and since the public sale and the pure bred stock business is one of the chief mediums through which the farmer and his calling is to be elevated and dignified as never before, it is plain to be seen that much thought should be given a subject of such immediate importance. The primary thought with reference to this subject is, “The Pure Bred Stock Business,” the “Public Sale’ being only a means to the end, and, therefore, of secondary consideration in this connection. The farmer who has at heart the future financial, educational and moral welfare of himself, his family and his children’s children, can 160 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. uly afford to ignore the question—whether or not he will interest himself in the matter of breeding pure bred stock? Throughout the corn and tame grass belt of this country of ours the best farm lands have become so valuable—worth so much money per acre—competition so close and margins on staple products so narrow, that the farmer who breeds, feeds and markets the low grade or scrub animal, be it horse, cow, hog, sheep, or any one of our better known domestic animals, cannot hope to do so and realize above the bare cost of production, indeed he can count himself lucky if his time has not been given to the running of machinery of the farm at a loss. No American citizen should be content in this country, fraught with such wonderful possibilities, to run his business upon the plane of bare maintenance, for, in the great, broad sense of the term, we can- not long stand still, but must either advance or go backward. Should the above propositions be admitted, and we think they must be, then the question of a remedy arises. We will not under- take to say that the pure bred stock business, of itself, i$ a “cure all” for the multitude of ills which beset the farmer in the management and execution of his business; but we do unhesitatingly assert that the farmer of average intelligence who will earnestly put himself to the interesting and pleasant task of studying the pure bred stock busi- ness, and you will then gradually and cautiously put into actual prac- tice the sound principles which he may learn from reading, observation and experience, will have taken a long stride toward correcting many of the symptoms suggesting stagnation, unthrift and everything an- tagonistic to the principles of progress as applied to farming and farm life as a pleasant, dignified and noble occupation. Those who for one or several reasons have failed to give the matter of breeding pure bred stock any serious consideration and, therefore, have never taken the first step; or those who have concluded because some erratic fellow who had more enthusiasm than sense, capital or experience, failed ; it would, therefore, be foolish, if not dangerous, to invest in pure bred stock, will doubtless, and of right should expect us to point out the way in which they can safely start in this business with the rea- sonable assurance of success to the extent that will bring about finan- cial, educational and moral uplift. To do this to the entire satisfac- tion of myself will be a task for which I confess my inability, but, nevertheless, I shall always be found willing to contribute my mite toward bringing about the desired results. The class of men with which we have to deal in this connection may be divided into three croups; first are those who are hard-headed, ignorant and will not listen to argument or be convinced even after actual demonstrations -*, 2 4 * . pe ere eee. - ; : \ = Soo CHO HAMPTON’S fori reese ancae es gs cots. MASTER OF THE Gt HAMPTONS MODEL = ge grand group of Shorthorn Bulls, owned by LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 161 have been made; the second group embraces a very large class known as the thoughtless. indifferent, happy-go-lucky sort of fellows, who rarely give any subject serious or deliberate consideration; then there is the third class which includes the uninformed, but ambitious and willing to learn and profit from the knowledge and experience of suc- cessful men who have gone before them. It has been said that “There are none so blind as those who will not see.’ It is, therefore, almost useless to spend time in the vain effort to convert the proverbial un- believer—the man who without good reason sets his head against progression. In order to exert any beneficial influence upon the class enumerated in our second group it is necessary to make forcible, direct appeals, and this is scarcely ever accomplished except at public sales and by the personal force and logic of the auctioneer who, for the time, may, perchance, have one or several of this indifferent class of people within his influence and thereby induce him or them to become purchasers. Even when this is accomplished the chances are that in quite a per cent of instances the new convert will revert to his orig- inal shiftless, indifferent habits and, as a consequence, little ground will have been gained, because, as in all other businesses, the breed- ing of pure bred stock to be successful requires studious habits and a willingness to give attention to, at least, the details of ordinary care and management. It, therefore, remains for us to conclude that a very large majority of the new recruits in the future great army of im- proved stock breeders must come from the third or last class of in- dividuals herein referred to. To the majority of men “money talks,” therefore, one of the first things to be done is to convince the un- converted farmer that by discarding the scrub, grade or nondescript sire and by replacing him with a good and carefully selected pure bred he will thereby be money in pocket instead of out. That such is the case is no longer a theory, but is a fact being demonstrated in every enlightened community, also at the live stock markets of the country on every business day of the year. Every business that permanently succeeds must rest upon a broad and well grounded foundation. No business is more permanent than that of farming, because the entire population looks to the farmer to be both fed and clothed. The farmer operates the machinery supply- ing the raw material which furnishes the world with all of the neces- sities, also a multitude of the luxuries of life. With this responsi- bility, never ending demand and unsurpassed outlet for our products, we have not to consider so much the finding of a market as we have to give thought to economical and profitable production. A—11 162 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Taken collectively the farms of America, in point of value and productive importance, outrank all other manufacturing institutions combined. Among the manufacturers of commercial commodities vast sums of money are wisely spent in the investigation of ques- tions and principles, the application of which will reduce the cost of production, raise the efficiency of the article manufactured, and also to perfect the question of the distribution of the finished product with the greatest economy. This work has been carried to a wonderful state of perfection and when the time comes, if it ever should, that even one-tenth of the intellect and capital spent in the application of real, not imaginary, economical principles of production with refer- ence to the farm as a manufacturing institution, then our country will bloom as a rose and the scrub farmer and the scrub animal will be a vanishing species, Live stock farming—by which is meant keeping live stock on the farm—is, and in the future will be the only safe means of main- taining the productive qualities of the farm manufacturing plant. Without live stock the capacity of the farm plant is annually de- creased because of the inability to return to the soil the fertilizing elements required to sustain the maximum limit of production. Some will doubtless say: “What has all this to do with the pure bred stock business, as the scrub animal will return as great an amount of ferttl- izing element to the soil as the pure bred?” ‘This is true, but where the pure bred, or high grade, excels the scrub is in his ability to consume the grain and forage crops of the farm, and, as a machine, most economically convert them into a product for which there is always a demand for the best at top market values. Experiment station work, market reports and the practical experience of our most intelligent and successful farmers, breeders and feeders, as well as expert buyers, packing house owners and conveyors, are all on the side of the pure bred or the high grade animal as being consistent money makers on the farm. The above argument applies to the production of the com- mercial products in its live state and forms the basis for our conten- tions with reference to the advisability of making the breeding of pure bred, recorded stock a part of our farm business. The fact that it requires the pure bred or high grade animal to acquire the results above mentioned argues the absolute necessity of the perpetuity of the pure bred animal for breeding purposes, else, in a very few short years we will find ourselves scarce of this vitalizing material. The natural tendencies of all improved animals and plants are to deteriorate unless cultivated and given congenial environments and opportunities for improvement and development. Man himself is LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 163 no exception to this rule. The truth of these statements poimts the moral that there will always be a demand for pure bred breeding ant- mals such as will insure the producer of the good kind a profitable market. But, I fancy, some one inquires, “Where does the economy in breeding pure bred stock come in?’ Speaking from my own ex- perience and a very wide field of observation I can say that the farmer who breeds and grows pure bred animals, taking as a basis the average of the sales the country over, realizes from two to ten times as much per head for the surplus product of the herd, the relative increased amount depending upen the quality, breeding, condition, etc., of his animals, than does his neighbor farmer who breeds common stock. Then I would ask: “Is it not more economical to shelter and feed one animal that will do the work of from two to ten, than it is to house and feed the larger number: We say yes and can point to innumerable instances to prove the assertion. Now as to the educa- tional advantages to be derived from keeping pure bred stock. No sooner is the first pure bred animal placed upon the farm than the educational influences are set to work. The neighborhood gossip is at once turned to something better and which stands for improve- ment. The local paper, if it does its duty, announces the advent into the community of an animal of improved breed and type. Asa result of all this the owner and his family begin to realize a degree of pride in the fact that it has been imposed upon them to be leaders instead of followers in their community. In order to maintain this enviable and commendable position they begin to read up and keep themselves informed with reference to the history of the breed, its ancestry and other mattcrs pertaining to care, ieed, management, etc., to the end that their life and vision becomes broadened by being brought into touch with progressive movements of the times. Soon the agricultural college and the courses in live stock hus- bandry are learned of, finally the son or father or both takes advantage of the short course in live stock judging and thus a new world is opened up. After that fairs are attended and the awarding of prizes is watched with awakened interest. By this time our candidate is associating himself with the best class of men, whom he finds con- genial company because they are sensible and willing to give informa- tion, gained from the field of experience, which, to the young man or beginner seeking knowledge, is invaluable. A public sale is attended and here, too, a new field is found for observation and instruction. By this time the breeding of pure bred stock is a subject that has taken hold of the family and has not only been the means of broaden- ing their views of life, but has also brought them into prominence as 104 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. progressive people, and soun the sons and daughters are in demand from those seeking to employ young men and women of good families to fill responsible positions of trust at remunerative compensations. The sons and daughters from such families also invariably enjoy superior advantages when it. comes to the matter of selecting a life companion and thus the educaticnal influences arising from that first etart in the pure bred stock business goes on and on from generation, wielding an immense influence for good in their own immediate com- munity and to society in general. The improvement of one’s moral status, as well as the educational advantages obtained from breeding pure bred stock, is also a matter worthy of consideration. The more nearly one’s time is occupied in studying questions relative to any form of improvement, the less time they have to devote to the trivial non-essentials of life. One of the first things to be learned by the beginner in the breeding of pure bred stock is that all future substan- tial success in the business depends upon his standing and reputa- tion as an honest man. Absolute and unqualified honor is an essential requisite to success in this business, because a man’s word and repre- sentations are the only guides we have as to the identity of his stock and the reliability of their breeding, age, etc. If it is once learned that a breeder has misrepresented the age, breeding, or anything pertain- ing to record of his stock, he soon loses caste and is viewed with suspicion thereafter. Thus it is that a man’s moral status is given additional impetus and support after he has engaged in the breed- ing Of pure bred stock. Fearing that this article will be too long we will but briefly refer to the “Public Sale” feature of the subject. The “Public Sale” along with the agricultural press, the agricultural college and public exhi- bitions of fine stock is exerting a mighty influence both in an educa- tional way and in the distribution of such stock. Many a farmer attends a public sale and secures his first impression of the vital importance of breeding improved stock. Here he learns by way of actual demonstration that it is profitable to breed and sell pure bred animals for breeding purposes. In this way the well informed, intelli- gent auctioneer is in position to do much good and be of advantage to both the buyer and the seller. I have heard prominent breeders declare that they had received some of their most valuable lessons from attend- ing public sales. There was a time when the public sale was looked upon with suspicion, but that time, I am thankful to say, is passed and today no business is run upon a higher plane of business ethics than the selling of pure bred live stock by auction. As a convenient LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 165 and satisfactory means of disposing of one’s surplus stock, or for closing out one’s business, the public sale has come to be recognized as being indispensable. How to conduct a successful public sale, when and where to hold it, how to advertise, when to begin to condition the stock for sale, just the kind of catalogue to issue and when it should be out, the auctioneer to employ, how to entertain your customers sale day and various other questions are each subjects which might be considered at some length, but they are outside the legitimate limitation of our subject. In conclusion I will say that, in my opinion, the inter-rela- tion of the public sale and the pure bred stock business will, in the future, grow stronger and become more potent for good alike to the breeder, buyer and the public in ceneral. IMMUNIZATION AS A MEANS OF CONTROLLING CON- LAGIOUS DISEASES: (Dr. J. B. Tiffany, Agricultural College.) Mr. President and Members of the Live Stock Association: It is getting late and I did not expect to have to speak to you, but as I am called upon I will condense my remarks as much as possible. My subject is that of “Immunization as a Means of Controlling Contagious Diseases.” The Veterinary Department of this University is in the habit of sending out a great many doses of blackleg vaccine to the farmers, and the thing that has appealed to me most is that a large number of these doses go out in small quantities, showing that the farmers who are raising from five to fifty calves are sending for this blackleg vaccine for the purpose of inoculation. That, seems to me, points to the fact that the small farmer is beginning to use this biochemical product in his work, and in their letters they frequently ask a great many questions as to the use of blackleg vaccine and oc- casionally some of the reasons for its use and the methods of making it. It occurred, therefore, to me that it would be interesting to you to know something of the theory on which the subject is based and the explanation of the dangers and limitations of the use of various vac- cines. This talk will apply to other vaccines besides the one that I have mentioned, all of which come under these principles. You know that when an animal passes through a dangerous in- fectious disease it becomes immune, does not readily take that par- ticular disease again, and is more or less resistant to the disease. « 166 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. This has been observed for a long time, and is known as natural im- munity. Some scientific people came to the conclusion that they could produce a disease in an animal, establish immunity thereby, but not produce the disease in such a form as would kill the animal, and in that way save a great many head of stock. That theory is worked gut until now we use vaccine commercially for blackleg, anthrax, etc. ‘There is a theory or hypcthesis on which all this is based, and I want to explain it briefly so that I can point out something of the danger in its use. The theory is that when some pathologic organisms once enter the system they commence to multiply and elaborate a poison known as toxin, which is carried to the various parts of the animal body through the circulatory system and produces what we know as dis- ease. The poison from the various different pathogenic organisms produces a different series of symptoms which we recognize as specific disease. If this production of toxin-poisoning went on indefinitely the result would be the death of the individual, but nature has pro- vided a means to hold this in check. There is thought to be produced a material which we choose to call anti-toxin whenever there is a disease caused by the presence in the animal body of certain organ- isms. The disease is counteracted by this substance known as anti- toxin, and we make use of this anti-toxin in various ways. The one disease. in which we have come to use it commercially is that of tetanus or lock-jaw. In some cases anti-toxin for tetanus is proving very efficient, while in others it is not, and the reason we attribute to this difference in results is that after the disease has gone so far that the poison has entered the different organs and has made certain anatomical changes, we know there is no agent that we can introduce into the system that will check the disease; whereas, if the anti-toxin is injected into the system previous to the poison’s once reaching the center, it is going to work and it will neutralize the poison and the animal may recover. In vaccination, as you know, we introduce into the animal or- canism a deadly germ and this germ has been so treated, i.-e., has passed through certain environments, certain uncongenial conditions, such that it will not produce the disease in its original vigor. But at the same ‘time it will produce some toxin, and this encourages the animal system to produce the anti-toxin or neutralizing agent, and from this the animal becomes immune and resists any subsequent attack of the disease. You see, if we can by keeping these germs under unfavorable con- LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 167 ditions get them in such shape that they will not produce a disease like blackleg in its most virulent form, we also may have a condition in which we can grow these germs in such a way that they will produce the disease in a more virulent form. That is shown in the disease of tabies or hydrophobia. In passing the germs of that disease through rabbits we get a disease which is much more virulent, the period of incubation is considerably reduced and the disease appears in a more dreadful form. It so happens that these organisms that we introduce into an animal system are capable of either becoming deadened or reduced in strength or becoming stronger and more virulent. Fur- thermore, these attenuated organisms once introduced into a system also may be brought back to their original strength and their original ability to produce the disease, and that is what has happened in a great many cases—has happened in some cases—not to put it too strongly, especially with the virus or vaccine of anthrax. You do not have anthrax in this State so very much, but-in some states it is quite serious, and when it once enters a community it carries off stock very rapidly. In order to protect themselves in various districts, the stock raisers have brought this vaccine of anthrax into the community and as a result they have started the disease. Some have attributed it to the fact that the vaccine was not properly made, that the company making the vaccine did not take the proper care and got into it some organisms which were not sufficiently attenuated, but it might have Been, and we have proved it possible many times in the laboratory, that the germs have been attenuated, but by passing them through individuals that were particularly susceptible to the disease, they will bring the organisms back to their original strength and make them as dangerous as when the laboratory experts began their work upon them. The danger is not so great in blackleg vaccine because the germs seem to be more under our control, but in anthrax there is this element of danger, and there is a possibility of such danger in black- leg where we introduce the vaccine into a new community. Of course, where the disease is already prevalent and present, where a man is directly surrounded by these diseases, then the only thing for him to do is to inoculate his stock with the vaccine that he can secure, to prevent the discase. He has to do it then as a protection, but in a locality where these diseases are not present, to go ahead inoculating stock with the various chemical products of vaccine companies is an exceedingly dangerous thing. They do it in the West sometimes as an insurance measure. Some people spray their fruit trees and vines as a protective measure, not knowing that any disease is going to e 168 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. attack them, but simply as a protective measure to guard against the possibility of insect ravages. The same men that become too progressive might be induced to do the same thing with their cattle, i. e., inoculate them against various infectious diseases. As a result there would be this possibility of introducing virulent organisms into a community and this is the point I wish to emphasize. I will say a word about the vaccine for hog cholera. We have a disease in hog cholera which is not suitable to the use of any anti- toxin, nor is it suitable to the method of exterminating such as we use in tuberculosis and glanders. We cannot use these methods with hog cholera, and the only thing we have to rely upon is a vaccine. The demand for hog cholera vaccine has been so great that all over this country companies have been putting out a vaccine against hog cholera, and every year there is some new concern organized for this purpose, but so far all have proven failures. Some of them wil! sell for a short time—a year or two—and people who use them feei that they have done some good. The probability is, the reason that in some cases hog cholera vaccine works, is that some time before the man sends for his vaccine the hogs are suffering from the disease, and those which are attacked early in the season are the ones most susceptible; that is, the ones that produce the least amount of anti-toxin in their bodies, which tends to check the distase. Those hogs that will pro- duce the most anti-toxin in their bodies are the ones least susceptible and the ones that take the disease last in the herd. Now, the owner of the stock waits some time before he sends for this vaccine, then, after he sends for it, it takes some time for it to get there, and, accord- ing to the directions, it will take a week or two before the vaccine begins to act, and by that time a!l the more susceptible hogs have been killed off, leaving only those that are resistant to the disease and would recover, anyway. In that way the various hog cholera vac- cines have been supposed to be useful, but in truth we have not found a hog cholera vaccine. Still, from the nature of the disease—from the fact that there is immunity in hog cholera—it seems that there ought to be a hog cholera vaccine. Many times in making an examina- tion of a pig that has recovered from hog cholera, we find the hog cholera organism present there, which would indicate that there is a large amount of anti-toxin in the animal’s body which stops the dis- ease and prevents its further occurrence. So we have evidence that in the future we will produce a hog cholera vaccine, and it is the plea of the farmers of this country that there be a vaccine produced for this purpose. We are receiving in this department a great many letters Rowena 2d and her calf. Dual purpose Shorthorn cow, owned by H. J. Hughes, Trenton, Missouri, Official ree- ord of Rowena 2d is 4,053 pounds of milk, test 4.3, making 201.18 pounds of butter in 120 days, gained during time 1389 pounds in weight. 4 ed a ° 45/3 y . ' ‘ ® ie a ! 6 “it Ply cvs cb « : . 1 *.a- LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 169 inquiring about this vaccine, asking if there is not one that we can recommend, all showing that there is a tremendous pressure for such a product. There have been in the past some very able men working on this project, but they have largely given the matter up in disgust, after trying all the methods that they knew. But since that time there have been a great many new things found out about the subject of immunt- zation, and now we believe that these new methods should be applicd to hog cholera. At present you know that Dr. Connaway is in Europe and is making a close study of this matter. He is studying a disease semewhat similar to hog cholera—an acute disease known as Rouget. They have a vaccine for this disease which is efficient, and Dr. Con- naway is making a careful study of this disease, and we hope on his return he will be the best prepared man in this country to investigate the matter of hog cholera and provide some means of immunization, which is so sorely needed. fii REEATION OF AGE AND: CONDITION | TO“PROFIT Ps Abani ea LING: (Prof. F. B. Mumford, Acting Dean, Agricultural Oollege.) 1 have been impressed with one thing in these meetings here, and that is that most of the farmers and stock breeders want to know all there is to be known about all of these subjects. The farmer wants to know immediately whether it is best to feed corn and linseed meal to hogs or some other ration. They want to know everything as soon 2s possible. That is all right. That is what the Experiment Station is for, to find out these things, and to find out the facts that the men who are carrying on the business of Agriculture want to know. At the same time it is not so easy and simple a process as perhaps some of us have been led to believe. We knew a whole lot more things a few years ago than we know now—at least we said we did, and were more positive and more dogmatic about it then than now. I have been impressed with another thing, namely, when some one man has been successful in feeding animals and paid particular atten- tion to some one thing, he may attribute his success to that one thing, but at the same time he fulfilled all the other conditions necessary for successful feeding. The longer we experiment with feeding cattle for the production of beef, the more difficult the question becomes and the more complicated the problems involved. It is a much simpier 170 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. matter to investigate the influence of different methods of feeding and different kinds of feed with dairy cows than any other animal that we have to deal with, because the product which we seek in the case of the cow is a definite product, one that we can measure daily. We know its composition, and we know every day how much water, how much fat, how much casein, and other solids of the milk the cow yields every day, and by feeding a definite amount we have an accurate meas- ure of the influence of a kind of feed upon a cow. But in the case of beef animals we have no such accurate measure. The only real stand- ard of measure that the experimenter has to determine the efficiency of different kinds of rations for feeding beef cattle is the gain in live weight, and some of you know that the gain in live weight may mean a good deal. Sometimes it may mean a lot of water, sometimes it may mean bowel content. We try to get around the variations in the bowel content in vari- ous ways so that the gain in live weight may be as much as possible an accurate measure. We always weigh the animals at a certain time in the day. We weigh them before they drink any water. We shut up the water troughs before we weigh the cattle, so that the variation is regulated as much as possible. But, even when all that is done, we are not positive that feeding ten bushels of corn for a certain period will result in an actual gain of live weight to the animal; although the scales may say that the animal has gained so much, he may not have gained so much, but may have only filled up so much. Now, I will not attempt to take up the subject of cattle feeding in all of its phases, nor discuss all of the factors which determine profit in cattle feeding, but I will very briefly mention one or two factors that have been under discussion and upon which we have had some definite statements and about which the practical feeder wants to know the facts in the case as far as he is able; and one of these ques- tions that I propose to discuss is the “Influence of Age on Profitable Cattle Feeding,” or upon the profits from cattle feeding, and another is the “Influence of Condition.” It is rather an interesting analogy that we draw between the ani- mal and the machine. It has been stated here several times that the animal is a machine, and the analogy is not one that is far-fetched, and it may be a very useful one. The animal is a machine. The farmer is a manufacturer and in the production of beef the farmer uses the animal as a machine to work over the feeds of the farm— the raw vegetable products like hay and corn—for the production of beef, mutton or pork, and in this production of animal material we LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 7d have certain conditions to fulfill. For one thing the feeder is engaged in improving the animal in such a way that it will bring the highest price on the market, that is, will be finished in the best way to supply a real demand. The farmer is also interested in finishing the animal for the least expenditure of money. Two conflicting principles are therefore involved in cattle feeding. We must feed the animals to a point where they will fill the demands of the market. It does not make any difference how much it costs. We must do that. If we are in the feeding business, that presupposes that we are finishing beef for the purpose of selling it, and in order to sell it we must bring it to a certain finish and we want to do that at the lowest expense of feed. There are these two things that we must always remember, and I insist upon these two points. Why? Because a good many feeders are confused in discussing this matter of the cost of pro- ducing a pound of gain. The profits are frequently measured in the minds of the practical feeder by the amount of grain it requires to pro- duce a hundred pounds of gain, and that is not a true measure. While we make an animal gain, we must at the same time be pushing him toward a condition of finish. If it was only a matter of producing gain in the quickest and cheapest way, we would buy the poorest and thinest animals we could find that had been poorly nourished for some time and fill them up. As a matter of fact, the first stages of the feeding period are the cheapest, so far as the cost of producing a pound of gain is concerned. What are some of the factors, now, which lie at the foundation of the practice of finishing cattle and finishing them cheaply? There are two things that bear upon both of these questions, they are the age of the animal and his condition at the time the feeding begins. One fact which has perhaps been more definitely demonstrated in this matter of feeding than any other, is the fact that the younger the animal, the less feed will be required to produce a given amount of gain. It is not a mere matter of opinion now. We know a young animal will produce a pound of gain with less grain than an older animal of the same kind under the same conditions, and there are in some cases remarkable differences. The attention of feeders was first called to this fact by the men who fed the cattle for the old fat stock show in Chicago. Those feeders commenced with a calf at the time ef birth, began to feed it, and fed it continually for one year. They exhibited it as a calf, a yearling, a two-year old and a three-year old. They found that the first year the animal fed in that way required about half as much to produce a pound of increase as in the second [72 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. year of that animal’s life. And they found that it required consider- ably less grain to make a pound of gain on the steer 12 to 24 months old than was required to produce a pound of gain ona steer 24 months old and over. Then the experiment stations investigated the matter. The Michi- gan Experiment Station, the lowa Experiment Station and one or two other stations undertook what were called in those ancient days “breed experiments.’ They undertook to test which was the better animal to feed, the Shorthorn, the Hereford, the Aberdeen-Angus, the Galloway, the Holstein or Jersey, and they began with these animals as young as possible, in most of these experiments, beginning with the animal, say a few months old, and they discovered the same thing, that if an animal was fed from birth to death on full feed that the first days—the young days of that animal—were the most profitable days from the standpoint of the amount of feed consumed. They found the same things true with lambs and pigs. The experiments indi- cated that young pigs from fifty to a hundred pounds in weight would make a pound of gain with three or four pounds of grain and that 300 pound pigs required five or six pounds of grain to produce the same amount of gain. This has been demonstrated, and some experi- ment station workers and feeders have come to the conclusion from this data that it is more profitable to feed younger animals than older animals, and so we have heard about “baby beef” animals, fed from the time they are born till they are 14 to 18 months old being made to weigh twelve hundred or fourteen hundred pounds and we are told this is the most profitable way to handle cattle, and their conclu- sions are based largely upon these experiments that I have just described. One of the most interesting experiments on this subject I have examined in all the work of Experiment Stations is an experiment con- ducted by the Central Experiment Station Farms at Ottawa, Canada. They performed this experiment differently than those mentioned above. They employed calves, yearlings, two-year and three-year old cattle under identical conditions, so far as possible, and fed them on the same rations. The results are certainly very interesting to the man who is engaged in making beef. The average daily gain from these animals tested was as follows: Calves 2.14 pounds, yearlings 1.85, two-year olds 1.67 and three-year olds 1.65. The calves gained much more than the others, the yearlings next, the two-year olds next and the three-year olds least of all. The cost of the 100 pounds of gain was also very much in favor LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 173 of the calves, in this instance. The relative costs per hundred pounds of gain for these different ages were for calves $3.60 a hundred for the grain fed; yearlings $4.65; two-year olds $5.70; three-year olds $6.20. It cost almost twice as much, not quite, to produce 100 pounds of gain on three-year old steers as upon calves in this experiment. The profit per steer is as follows: On the calf $14; on the yearling $26; on the two-year old $26, and on the three-year old $16. The calf returned the lowest profit per head and you might immediately jump to the con- clusion that therefore the calf is not so profitable as the two or three- year old; but this does not tell the story at all, because you have in- vested in the three-year old nearly three times as much as you have in the calf. I'or the same money that it would cost to buy a three- year old, you could probably buy three calves. In this experiment the actual facts are that the calves cost $3.50 a hundred; the yearlings $4 a hundred; the two-year olds $4 a hun- dred; and the three-year olds $4.50 a hundred, and they sold the calves for $5.50 per hundred and the others for $3.17 a hundred. These were the market prices. But assuming that all of the cattle were bought for 4 cents and sold for 5 cents a pound, and estimating the profit on a thousand pounds of calves bought at 4 cents and sold at 5 cents and a thousand pounds of one, two and of three-year olds bought at 4 cents and sold at 5 cents, we have the following figures: on the calves the profit is $22.30 a thousand pounds; on the yearlings $11.36; on the two-year olds $7.95, and on the three-year olds $7.10. Suppose a man had’a thousand dollars to invest—and that is the proposition that confronts most of us—which is the best, to invest a thousand dollars in calves, yearlings, or two-year olds for profitable feeding? Assuming that we have a thousand dollars to invest and taking these figures I have given you, of buying the animals at 4 cents and selling them at 5, here are the profits resulting from the feeding experiments on the thousand dollars invested: On the thousand dollars invested in calves at the time of birth, the profit was $557; on two-year olds $198; on three-year olds $177. Do not hold me respon- sible for the profits that these men made on these cattle, that is not my fault, and it is not my fault if you cannot make the same profit. What I want you to pay attention to is not the absolute, but the . relative profit. Now the profit made on three-year olds on the thou- sand dollars invested in this Canada Station was $177.50, and on the two-year olds it was $198. On the yearlings it was $284, and on the calves it was $557. Now, what does this mean? It means what I have tried to make clear above, that the results of our experiments 174 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. have brought out repeatedly that if you can buy young animals at the same price per pound and sell them for the same price per pound, there is more profit in feeding young animals. Now, I have put a good many ifs in the above sentence and every feeder must do the same when he begins to feed. If we could control the market by ascertaining beforehand what you could buy and sell your animals for, you could speak with some definiteness and figure with some definiteness. But the principle has been demonstrated that younger animals put on a gain for less grain. Now, if market conditions are such that you can buy and sell them for the same price, the profit is in the younger animal, but our experience in Missouri is that we pay from 15 to 20 per cent more per pound for calves than we do for older cattle for feeders, and when we go to sell them, the older cattle, as a rule, sell for a little more per pound. I am willing to be corrected if that is wrong. Now, I must: confess that I am a little skeptical on this proposition—that these results are so unusually large that there must be some special reason for it. Of course I cannot tell what that reason is. The only thing I can do is to give our actual trial here on this farm under Missouri conditions and the figures that we have. We have now in progress here perhaps the largest cattle feeding experiment undertaken to solve one question, and that will be continued for a longer time on one particular line of work than any other single cattle feeding experi- ment so far undertaken in the United States. And one of the things that we are testing and making foremost in this experiment is this question of the relation of age to profitable feeding. Should the Mis- souri farmer feed young cattle or older cattle? In the fall of 1902 we purchased 75 head of cattle and divided them in the course of time into three divisions. One division was wintered and put on full feed about the first of May and sold the 15th of Jauuary, 1904. Another one of these divisions was put on pasture alone during the season that the others were being finished, and they were finished this year and sold in December last year and fed from May ist to December 15th, 1904. They were of the same breeding so far as we were able to secure them. They were of equal quality and ability to gain and they were finished as two-year olds. The first division were finished as yearlings, the second as two-year olds and we will put on feed next May a lot of three-year olds from that original draft of cattle. But we have also fed during that time another lot of yearlings this vear in comparison with the two-year olds. We have had 55 head of cattle on feed from May tst, 1904, until the 15th of December. ~ LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 175, We have some figures for comparing on even terms this factor of age on profitable cattle feeding. I do not want you to confuse the rations, although that is another question of growing interest about which we have something definite to say. But I want to call your attention now particularly to the amount of grain required to produce a pound of gain on these cattle at different ages. I will first present the figures for this present season, from May Ist to December 4th, 1904, the feeding period just ended. From May 1st to December 1st, 1904, we fed one lot of 30 yearling Shorthorns in comparison with one lot of two-year olds and the amount of grain required to produce a pound of gain, which tells the story in this case, and the whole gain I will give you. Lot I was fed on corn and linseed meal and the daily gain was for the yearlings 2.45 pounds, and the grain required to produce a pound of gain was 7.77 pounds. The lot fed on corn and cotton seed meal made a gain of 2.24 pounds at an expenditure of 8.3 pounds of grain. Lot III was fed on corn and gluten feed and they made a gain of 2.23 pounds per day, and it required 7.76 pounds of grain to produce that gain. Lot IV was fed shelled corn alone, and they gained 2.23 pounds per day at an expenditure of 7.27 pounds. These latter were year- lings. I will now give the results with the two-year olds on blue grass pasture and the same grain rations. The daily gains of the two-year olds were as follows: On corn and linseed meal 2.97 pounds; on corn and cotton seed meal 2.65, pounds; on corn and gluten feed 2.06 pounds; on shelled corn alone 2.51 pounds; the grain required to produce a pound of gain was 8.1 pounds; 8.7-pounds; and 817 pounds re- spectively. Now, here we have a much more accurate experiment than the one previously described, because these animals were fed the same season; they were fed exactly the same way the winter previous, and they started into the experiment in the same condition so far as we were able to judge. The daily gain of the yearlings on corn and lin- seed meal was 2.45 pounds; the two-year olds 2.97 pounds; the amount of grain required to produce a pound of gain was 7.77 pounds and 8.1 pounds respectively. It required less grain for the yearlings than for the two-year olds, notwithstanding the large gain made by the two-year olds, and by the way, this is a very remarkable gain for a lot of cattle for the entire season. It is seldom indeed that cattle make an average of three pounds of gain in a six months’ feeding period. With the cotton seed meal the gain was 2.26 pounds for the yearlings and 2.65 for the two-year olds. The daily gain with the 176 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. corn and gluten meal was less, 2.23 pounds with the yearlings and 2.06 pounds with the two-year olds. The amount of corn required was always less with the yearlings. This was an experiment on summer feeding. Three pounds of supplement was fed daily in each case, that is, three pounds of linseed meal, cotton seed meal and gluten feed. The amount of corn varied as the appetite of the animals increased. They were fed as much as 20 pounds of corn during the close of the period. The relative cost is a question that is almost idle to talk about, as is also the profit that is to be secured because prices of feed and cattle continually vary; but the daily gain on these different feeds under these conditions would remain about the same, and the amount of feed required will remain the same so long as the conditions are similar, These were good cattle—selected cattle, but they were seiected in both cases, in the yearling lots and the two-year olds. The two-year olds sold for $7.60. We have not sold the yearlings yet. This two-year old lot brought the highest price in the Chicago market, with one exception, during the entire year of 1904. They were March and April calves. They were sold in December when they were two years old. Here is my point, and it has a good deal of bearing upon this and the other question that I insisted upon in the beginning; it is not only a question of producing gain cheaply, it is a question of getting a good finish at the right time to sell. The yearlings we have ready to sell after the two-year olds, but if we had sold them at the same time, we would have had to be satisfied with a less price per pound. There is another question involved, if you consider the profits from cattle feeding, besides this question I have discussed, and I am inclined to suggest this point because it is of vital importance to the man who is making money from cattle feeding. The experiment sta- tion men like to find these things out, though they are not primarily interested in making money from every experiment, they are in- terested in finding out which experiment is most profitable. If you buy a thousand pound two-year-old at 4 cents a pound, you pay $40. Ii you feed’him six months and put on two pounds a day, he will gain 360 pounds. He will then weigh 1,360 pounds, and if you sell him for six cents a poiind—you sell him for $81.60. You increased the value of this original thousand pounds two cents per pound in the finishing process and thus make $20. ‘You receive not only the value of this 360 pounds that you put on, which amounts at six cents a pound to $21.60, but you also get your increased value on the thou- THE IMPORTEL FRENCH COACH STALLION ‘TORRENT,’ 2813. Torrent was bred by the most noted of French Coach Breeders, M. lallouet, who has produced some of the greatest winners of France. Torrent has a record of 3 kilometers (two miles) in five minutes, made over a sod track with a 140 pound man on his back. Torrent won the Spohr Trophy at the Chicago Horse Show as the best coach stallion, any age, has been shown at twenty State Fairs and has never been defeated. Won ist and Grand Championship Prizes at the International Live Stock Exposition at Chicago. 1903. Won Ist and Grand Championship Prizes at the St. Louis World’s Fair, 1904. And again at the International in Chicago, 1904, won 1st and Grand Championship Prizes. Torrent is owned by McLaughlin Bros., importers of Percheron and French Coach IIlorses, Columbus, Ohio, and Kansas City, Mo. cm | +a LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. D7. sand pounds original weight. Suppose this animal weighed only 500 pounds, you paid $20 for him and you put on the same gain, namely 360 pounds. You then have 860 pounds. You sell him for $51.60. At six cents a pound you have the same $21.60 profit that you had before, but you have only $10 for finishing the 500 pounds original weight instead of $20, and that is why it is sometimes better to feed two-year- olds than calves or yearlings, because you get an increased value on their original weight. The condition of the animal has a bearing upon this question of age. If we buy calves, most of which have not yet been weaned, they are usually in prime condition. Such calves will at first lose rather than gain when placed on feeds. Go to the market and buy range cattle after they have come 400 miles to the market and have been eating stock yards hay a while and they willl be in good condition to put on gain rapidly and that is an- other reason why it may not always be more profitable to feed young cattle. | Now I do not want to be understood as saying that it does not pay to feed young cattle. I have been discussing this question from only one view point—the standpoint of the big feeder who buys his cattle, and not from the standpoint of the man who raises his cattle. The man who raises his cattle is a very short sighted man if he fails to feed those cattle from the time they are born until they are ready to go to the market. This is where we get baby beef and that is why it is always profitable. It is unwise and unprofitable for a man who raises a good grade of cattle to keep them until they are two years old. This is a losing business. He should always feed them well and sell them at a young age. THE PERCHERON AND FRENCH CCACH HORSE FOR THE AMERICAN FARMER AND BREEDER. (Mr. W. M’Laughlin, Kansas City, Mo.) It is a well-known truth that the horses of a country partake to a very large extent of the characteristics of the people of that country. The people who inhabit Normandy, in the northern part of France, the country in which are raised both the Percheron and French Coach- ers, are not the sort of people whom Americans ordinarily think of as Frenchmen. These people partake fully as much of their ancestors A—12 178 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. from the north as they do of the southern blood in them. They are strong, large, vigorous and broad-minded; in other words, they are more like the people of America than perhaps those of any single nation in Europe. The horses bred in that country are of the type that one would expect. ‘There is no breed of draft horses in the world that possesses the same strength, the same force, the same elegance of conforma- tion, the same activity, the same ability for moving heavy loads at a rapid pace as does the Percheron. It has been proven without any question, and without danger of its being refuted, that the Percheron horse crosses better and does better than any other draft horse in this country; therefore, the horses brought from France to America are not compelled to undergo any great climatic changes. I am certain that it is due to a great extent to this fact that horses from France have been so successful in America. ‘The French people have been for centuries aided in the improvement of their breeds of horses by the government. At the present time no stallion is permitted to stand for public service in France until he has been passed upon by the government officials. This has aided very materially in the perfection of both the Percheron and the French Coach breeds of horses. The Percheron horse is bred in his purity in the district south- west of Paris, beginning about fifty miles from Paris, at Chartes, and extending about seventy-five miles west. It is oval in shape and is about fifty miles wide. In it are some of the most fertile valleys in the world. The country is broken, and on this account gives the necessary encouragement to producing not only a heavy horse, but one with great activity as well. The Coach horse is bred in the country north of the Percheron, between Alencon and the English channel. They are in no way in- termingled, as the line between the district where Percherons are bred and where Coachers are bred is very well defined. The Percheron is known throughout the whole of this country. In color he is usually gray or black. At the present time the black probably predominates. In height he is ordinarily about sixteen ° hands. In weight from sixteen to twenty-two hundred pounds, de- pending to a very great extent on the amount of flesh he carries. These horses have been bred in the same district, the son breeding and fol- lowing in the footsteps of the father, from time immemorial. They have been imported in large numbers to America, in fact such a drain has been made upon the country that a great many of the inferior LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 179 specimens have been brougit here, yet, nothwithstanding this fact, they have crossed with the native mares in America and produced animals vastly superior in conformation, in endurance, in elegance and in activity to those that the very best stallions of any other draft breed have ever been able to produce. At all the greatest shows of draft work horses in this country they have never been defeated by the produce of any other draft breed crossed with the mares of this coun- try. At the recent Inter-National in Chicago, these grade Percherons defeated the very best pure bred animals of the other draft breeds that unlimited expenditures of money ‘could find in Europe. The economical farmers of this country who wish to produce on their farms the greatest quantity of products with the least cost, and those are the men who are always successful, will find that grade Per- cherons will do more work on their farms for a less expenditure in feed than will any other breed of horses that can be found. I wish to urge this fact especially upon your attention. I do not think that there is any possible way of being of more benefit to a community than to be instrumental in procuring animals of this breed to work on your farms, and thereby not only increase the production, but diminish the cost as well. At this time, when so many of the young men are leaving the farms for the cities, it is essential in order to induce the young man to stay on the farm that he have some interest that will keep him there; good horses will produce more good effect in this line than will other breeds of live stock. There is also another side, which, while it should not, yet it will probably interest you more, that is the side which touches the pocket- book. There is no place in which the products of the farm can be placed more profitably than in good horses. There is always a de- mand for the best, and the best always brings high prices. Only re- cently in New York a large firm paid $45,000 for one-hundred-grade Percherons. These horses were ail bred in the middle west, and the men who bred them certainly never made more money out of the corn and oats they fed to any animals than they did from the oats and corn these horses ate, and while they were eating it they were enabled, after the age of two years, to always earn enough to much more than pay for the feed they consumed. There is another type of horse which is very profitable for the farmer to raise. It not only gives him great pleasure, but great profit as well. This is the highest class carriage horse. His height is about sixteen hands. Huis weight about twelve hundred pounds, and with this he must possess a beautiful conformation as well as good action. 180 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. The better the action the higher price he will bring. The production of this class of horses can be arrived at in no better and quicker way than by crossing the ordinary light mares of this country—the trot- ting mares or saddle mares—with a French Coach stallion. The country about Marion, Iowa, which has produced more high-class carriage horses than any other section of the United States, has used more French Coach stallions in their production than has any otlier section. . The French Coach horse has been developed to its present state of perfection by the French government in order to produce a horse of more courage, more endurance and better conformation than any other breed of horses in the world. That they have succeeded in this effort is proven by thé fact that all other countries in Europe come to France to purchase French Coach stallions for the improvement of their herds of carriage horses. There never was a better time to begin breeding and raising bet- . ter horses than the present moment. We now have an export trade firmly established for our grade Percherons and Coachers, so that the © time will come when the American farmer can not sell good ones for Europe at a profit better than he can receive for any other breeds of live stock. THE PACKERS AND THE RAILROADS—THE TWIN SER- PENTS, HOW TO BRUISE THEIR HEADS. (M. H. Pemberton, Centralia, Mo.) Sometimes I talk for fun—sometimes for money—but to-night | am talking for the farmer. I am one of the horny hands of the sons of toil—without the horny hands. But I know the farmer’s troubles, and I am here to tell some of them. Until I began farming I{ never knew that there were so many hogs in the world. I find the woods is full of them, and they all need ringing. A hog that don’t need ringing is down in the back, or dead. Another thing about a hog. I] have never gone out to feed my hogs yet and had one of them come up and wait until any of the rest got there. Not only does he not wait, but he grabs the corn and runs off with it. And the hog that has been lying around the corn-crib or drinking slop from the kitchen for a year or two is generally the biggest hog. The majority of mankind are not related to hogs, but some are, LIVE STOCK BREEDERS ASSOCIATION. 181 ‘and these you must ring. They are in the farmer’s corn-crib and eating up his substance. But my subject is not hogs, but serpents, the twin serpents, the Packers and the Railroads, and how to bruise their heads. Every monopoly and trust affects the farmer, as well as every other man not on the inside, and profiting by it, but the Beef - Trust and the Railroad monopoly are the two serpents whose slimy coils are around the farmer. To shake them off, to cut them loose, to bruise their heads, is the thought of the farmer. The farmer’s heel is just itching to get on them. And if I mistake not the signs of the times, we are going to see the heel of Uncie Sam come down, and woe be unto all that are beneath it. In the vatican in Rome, of which you have heard the college orator speak, is a celebrated work of art, a marble sculpture repre- senting Laocoon and his two boys being strangled by snakes. The faces of the father and sons express the most intense agony and pain as they struggle in the coils of the venomous serpents. Laocoon was a very strong man, but the serpents were smothering him. As I stood before this group of father and children struggling in the coils of those moccasin-headed snakes I thought, here is the American farmer, and that big snake there drinking blood from his side is the Beef Trust, and that other big snake wrapped about his arms to keep him from striking is his twin brother, the Railroad. And those little snakes—what did they represent? I couldn’t tell, unless they were the crooked betrayers of the people, who had crawled into the halls of the Legislature, and were simply there to catch the overflow. I have chosen this subject because the Packers and the Railroads are the two thorns now in the farmer’s flesh, and because I believe that the farmer will have to pick his own splinters out if he ever gets them out. The farmer in the past has been too easy—too good—too slow. He toiled all day and slept all night. He watched his own stuff, and forgot to watch the other fellow. He looked down and not up. The result is that the corporations have a patent on all his rights. But now the farmer is awake and wants his six-bits back. They were given or sold away by law, and by law they will have to return. For instance—I don’t like to deal in generalities—let us get down to particulars. The first time I went to market with my stock I didn’t like the way things were done there. The charges looked too high, and there seemed to be too many middle men standing around. The train got in a day late and we had to lay over. Yardage, feed and commission seemed out of proportion to the price of stuff, and I said, is this the way Missouri runs her stockyards? I was thinking 182 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. of “poor old Missouri” leaving her lambs to be shorn and led up to the slaughter without a murmur, when I was informed that the State of Missouri had nothing to do with it. Well, I said, is this the best the city of St. Louis can do? I was informed that the city of St. Louis had nothing to do with it. Well, said I, what is this thing here, anyway—who owns this building and these yards? A Stock Yards Company of gentlemen, who have little privileges in their pockets from the great State of Missouri to run them for their own benefit. The farmer holds his hands, and the Stock Yards Company goes down one pocket and the commission firms down the other, and if he gets back home with his breeches he is doing well. He had sense enough to raise or buy his stuff, and feed it, and ship it to market, but he hasn’t enough to sell it or buy more, and he has to have help to get his pass back home. I say to you that the great State of Missouri ought to own her own stockyards in the city of St. Louis, Kansas City and St. Joseph, and all the other centers of population in the State, and they ought to be run at a minimum cost for the benefit of the farmers, who pro- duce and ship the stock to market. Not only the State own the yards, but the farmer should be allowed to sell his own stuff and buy it in the open market. As it is, a killer in the city cannot or will not buy from a farmer in the country without allowing a fee to some pet com- mission firm. If one packing house buyer gets into the pen and bids on stuff, and wants his bid to be final, he will not be molested by his competitiors—his rival—his pal. They remind me of the way tramps do business. When meat is to be had they chalk the gate, and the next day his brother tramp stops for feed at the same place. I am not sure but that the State should maintain a slaughter- house, where the farmer can have stock killed at so much per hun- dred, which would open the market to retail butchers, who could buy it on the hook. It is done in other countries, and we certainly have as much sense as sleepy Europe. But the Beef Trust has us—they fix the price,-and they make the market. Why have hogs been worth about four cents at home all fall, with corn at 40 to 50 cents? Be- cause the packers are now packing their pork. And why will they sell higher in a very few weeks? Because the packers will have pork to sell. Like begets like. They handle the hogs so much they become like them. And why do the farmers and stockmen permit these con- ditions to exist? Because they have not howled out loud enough against them. These men we send to make our laws—they will listen to us, when they are sure the howl means business. At last a President of the United States has heard the farmer’s yell, and he has answered, LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 183 Rah! Rah! Rah! oh, yes sir—we’ll look into the Beef Trust—we’ll crack it to the railroads, and we’ll do any other old thing that the people demand. Publicity is the doctrine. It will pull bad things down, and it will-help good things up. My advice to farmers is, when you see a great evil, something that’s robbing you, just begin to yell, and get your neighbors to yell, and get everybody to yell, and don’t stop yelling until Uncle Sam asks, “what’s the matter?’ Then tell him the trouble, and tell him to move double quick. According to my doctrine, the states ought to take over the stock- yards, and manage and centrol them in the interest of the people as a whole. Let laws be enacted and enforced which will give absolute protection to the buyers and sellers in that market. And let the peo- ple in the towns and the country kill their own stock as far as possible. I was glad when I learned that right here in Columbia some enter- plising men were putting in an independent packing plant. Now you watch the packers run meat into this town at less than cost and try to crush cut this enterprise. If I were running a butcher-shop in this town and the packers offered me meat on the hook at the price of beef on the hoof, I would tell them to go to—wherever my religion would allow me to say. The packers violate the law every day. They agree daily on the price they will pay and the price at which they will sell. Supply and demand operate, of course, but the packers can push the price up or down just as they wish. Now this is no theory, and there is no guess- ing about it. I have seen them do it, and any other man who has bought and sold around where they do business has seen it. But what are we going to do about it? I’m too young to announce any radical remedies, but I will venture this much. If the farmer in par- ticular and the public in general will inform themselves of the live stock situation, and the dead stock situation, there will be something deing. But the public—oh! The public—they step over evils six feet high and never see anything until it bumps them in the head. Every man is trying to feather his own nest, with mighty little thought of the public good. Men become satisfied in their spheres of activity, forgetting that there are buzzards above them just waiting for a chance at their carcass. When we see the black shadows about us it is a good time to stop and take a shot at the beasts above. The man who keeps his nose constantly to the grindstone may sharpen his nose, but he will end up with a disfigured face. They used to make a heap of fun of the horse-back farmer, but I find that I can see more upon the top of a horse than I can on the ground. It’s a good 184 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. idea to get upon the fence occasionally and think a thought or two. The farmer’s job is not done when he has produced something, the pie has to be distributed—passed around, and he has to see to it that too many fingers don’t get in on it. A great day is ahead for the farmer. It used to be that the lead- ing citizen was a man most ignorant of agriculture. Today a man who knows not agriculture is an ignoramus, fit only to send to make our laws. And they used to think the farmer had hayseed in his hair, and didn’t know how to cut his whiskers, and wore one suspender by preference. That old farmer is dead, and they are growing selected seed corn over his grave. The high-class farm papers, the news- papers, the telephones, and rural delivery killed him. The modern farmer is on to his job, and what he does not know he is learning, and the main thing he is learning is to take care of himself, and look after his interests. You need not be surprised when he gets after the Beef Trust, and makes it hot for the railroads. It’s a part of his business. The people are coming into their own, and are learning that legisla- tors are their hired men, and that the machinery of the law was meant to use. The packers are a great people. They have helped to make the country what it is. They built the plants that slaughter thousands of animals that it takes daily to feed the multitudes, but we have a right that they confine their slaughtering to the animals, and let the farmer live. We must look after the goose that lays the golden egg. When the packers go beyond the purpose of their existence and com- bine to fix prices and violate the law, the people have a right, and ought to break up their illegal combinations. I hope I have not stated the case unfairly against the packers— but if the Beef Trust is not a serpent whose head needs. bruising, then Iam no judge of snakes. I will confess that I am a little bit sore on packers. I have been feeding four-cent hogs on fifty-cent corn, when I know and you know that the packers have arbitrarily held the price there until they could load up their coolers to unload on the public later at an exorbitant price and a tremendous profit to themselves. And if that won’t put a farmer on the war path, what will? I wish I was a great big lawyer—big enough to be Attorney-General, I would take a few rough-riding lessons, and tell you farmers to get up behind, and we would charge the Beef Trust before breakfast. I was a lawyer once—the kind you read about—who got a diploma, but never got acase. But I’m very well satisfied with my position—there is a better opening in Missouri for a live, kicking farmer than for a Democratic candidate for office. GROUP OF ABERDEEN ANGUS. First prize Missouri Young Herd, St. Louis World’s Fair. Also prize winners at the American Royal. Owned and exhibited by W. J. Turpin, Carrollton, Missouri. LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 185 So much for the packer. Now this Beef Trust has a brother, a twin brother, the Railroad Monopoly. Regulation of the railroads: is the question of the hour. In the early days the railroads were built by everybody. The capital came from many sources, and competi- tion was sharp. The people suffered no evil. But times have changed. We have had organization and combination until half a dozen families own the railroads of America. Competition is destroyed. Rates are fixed. Discriminations abound. Rebates are behind the scenes. The peopie’s rights are ignored, and the farmer’s only protection is to look out for the cars. At the outset I want to say that on this railroad question I’m a “gover menter.” I want to see the people in control of every public highway from a dog path up to the Atlantic. Because I believe that when everything belongs to the people the people ought to have possession of it. My politics is public ownership of all public utilities. I want to see every city own and operate street railways, her water works and lights. I want to see the great American continent with a net work of railroads owned and operated by the national govern- ment. I want to see ships and steamers, floated by Uncle Sam, and waving the stars and stripes upon every stream that touches America. Public highways and transportation belong to all the people and to unborn generations, and should never be given or sold away to private individuals. You say that we have the right to regulate and control transportation lines. Yes, but history has proven that we cannot do it. They have debauched our public servants with dirty money, and ob- tained privileges and franchises for nothing that were worth millions, and they have maintained a standing army of secret service men to watch the halls of Legislature and keep the people out; and I am sorry to say that in many cases some of the secret service men have gotten on the inside. The people furnish them a free seat, cut their whiskers, shine their boots and furnish them a free bath. Now I am not kic- ing on the bath—no doubt they need it—but the people need the seat tc put a man in. How many Senators in the United States do you suppose there are who are more watchful of the interests of certain corporations than they are of the people’s welfare? More than one, Iassure you. It is a hard thing to say, but wrongs are never righted by silence. Watch the railroad legislation now in process at Wash- ington, and if no Senator raises his hand against the people’s inter- est, I will retract. As long as United States Senators are chosen by State Legislatures we may expect railroads and corporations to con- trol legislation. The people in every county and in every State in © 186 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. the Union ought to exact a pledge from every candidate for the Legis- lature, that before he casts his vote for a United States Senator, that Senator should pledge himself to work for and vote for the election of United States Senators by direct vote of the people. Until we obtain possession of our law-making hodies, we cannot expect to controi and regulate the railroads, the corporations and the trusts, which are now preying upon the public. But, with public ownership of our law- making bodies, we could obtain control of public utilities that are now private monopolies. With public ownership of the railroads there would follow a parcels post system which would relieve the people from the merciless extortion of the greatest highway robbers of modern times, the express companies. The telegraph service would be at- tached to every postoffice, where it belongs; and the grip of many other monopolies would be broken. Now someone will accuse me of talking politics—I am not talking politics—I am talking self-preserva- tion. If President Roosevelt were nominated four years hence on a Republican platform declaring for the public ownership of railroads, the telegraph, a parcel post system, and the election of United States Senators by direct vote of the people, I would vote for him. And if Wm. J. Bryan were nominated on such a platform by the Democrats I would vote for him. And if I were nominated for the Legislature on such a platform two years hence, I would vote for myself. I lost my last election by not voting for myself, and I will never do it again. People think of public ownership of public utilities as a strange doctrine. They forget that the government manages the postoffice, the most gigantic business, the most intricate, and with more details than any other business ever inaugurated by man. They also forget that more miles of railroad are owned and operated by the govern- ment than by corporations. I go on the principle that if my neighbor does a thing a certain way and it is a big success, that it will pay me to investigate his business and do likewise. When other nations can give their people cheap passenger rates and freight rates, and make their railroads revenue producers, it is certainly worth our while to consider who has the better way. It is sometimes said that public ownership of railroads would cive too much chance for corruption. Wouldn’t it be better to have corrupt officials occasionally in the pub- lic service, where we would get at them and kick them out, than to have them continually in the private concerns where we can’t touch them with a forty-foot pole? I firmly believe that the final victory of the people over monopolies is to be had only in public ownership of public utilities. It is coming, but it is not here yet, and until it LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 187 comes the farmer and stockman must get the best relief possible un- der the present system. The question is forever settled that a rail- road is a public highway, and as such is subject to control and regu- lation. We may not be able to reach their secret coffers and prevent rebates and discriminations, but many evils and extortions can be corrected if we will use the machinery and powers that we have. And the farmer’s main power is kicking. Again we must get up steam by the farmer’s yell, and while the President is advocating federal regulation, and an increase of power of the Inter-State Commeice Commission, we ought to begin to yell, and yell so loud that our rep- resentatives at Washington will hear the echo, and will be afraid to come home until they do something to relieve the people from the greed and grasp of the railroads. SHOULD WE FEED THE CROPS ON OUR FARMS OR SEEL THEM? (D. T. Mitchell, Woodlandville.) Or in other words, is it best for a farmer to feed his crop to his stock on the farm—cattle, hogs or sheep—or sell the grain product? There are only two phases that I will attempt to bring out of this ques- tion in the discussion of this subject. The farmer will necessarily be influenced in answering this question by his view-point. If he regards as the foremost of all important questions, the piling up of dollars—if he thinks more of a plethoric bank account than he does of a bright son or a sweet daughter—or if he thinks it is no rebellion against nature to commence life with a vigorous, productive soil and leave it worn out, an ugly waste place, fit only to mar the beauty of nature and re- quire of the next occupant an accession of more wealth than he has put to his own account to restore its fertility, then he will pursue that course that will bring to his possession the greatest number of dollars. In doing this I think he commits a sin, in an agricultural sense, un- pardonable. I do not believe that any man has a moral right to take the resources that the Divine Creator has put into our hands and waste or abuse them, and the selling of crops from the land must necessarily entail this condition. It is a sin against the resources that have been committed to his care for a wise purpose. We have all heard the remark—I have at least in my own com- munity: “Well, this land will last and continue to produce, I suppose, as long as I live or I shall want it,” carrying out the idea that the Al- 188 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. mighty had no other object in view in the creation of that land than his occupancy or its use during his life time. Certainly we ought to have enough patriotism and love for our fellow men to not export that fertility which has been so abundantly given to our possession. If we continue to drain our soils by the carting off of our products without reimbursing them, we must necessarily deplete our soils. Another reason: We are better prepared to meet the question of transportation in a concentrated form by feeding our products on the farm than by carting it and selling it in a crop form. I use to live in the Rocky Mountains. The concentration of the ores was se- cured by a succession of innumerable mines, they were concentrating mines by which they reduced the weight to such an extent that the ores could be sent to the smelting plants, and otherwise they could not have transported them at all. This same process will apply when farmers understand that a bushel of corn weighing 70 pounds can be put into five pounds of beef, and so on through the entire list, including the greatest concentration, the dairy product, and they will see the eco- nomical aspect of this question in the matter of shipment of our stock as compared with our grain products. Therefore, for two reasons, I think we should feed the products of the farm on the farm rather than to sell them in their crop condition, from the fact that we maintain the fertility of our soil thereby and can concentrate our product so that we are not so heavily taxed in getting it to the market. These are the two ideas I advance, and thank you for your attention. NEW METHODS. (Hon. M. V. Carroll, Sedalia, Mo.) When I begun to consider the subject assigned me as a preliminary to the preparation of this paper, I was undecided whether I should feel complimented over the fact that its boundaries are as limitless as the ocean, or regret that the starting and stopping points were not more clearly defined. I have heard that in political meetings, where the man- agers have to deal with a verbose, long-winded individual, they aim to make him chairman and thus curb his talking propensity. Were this theory applied I should feel complimented that the program committee had sufficient confidence in my bent for concentration to assign me a subject practically devoid of limitations. The sphere of operations covered by the two organizations repre- LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 189 sented in this meeting—the live stock breeders and corn growers—in- cludes the major portion of the whole field of Agriculture. It has been said that there is nothing new, that the discoveries of today are the forgotten knowledge of former times. Were this literally true the task assigned me—that of indicating new methods for the application of farmers and stockmen—would be an impossible one. In the presence of an audience such as I am facing, composed as it is of learned college professors, bright and quick-witted students and successful farmers and stockmen who possess the cumulative knowledge that comes from long years of experience and research, it would be presumptuous for me to attempt to specify any new or unheard of methods. But we are all more or less prone to forgetfulness, hence what I may say will be to you as re- minders rather than innovations. REAPING WITHOUT SOWING. Knowledge is of no practical value unless applied. There was a time in this country when the custom of sneering at what was designated as “book farmin’’’ was widespread and popular and its votaries delighted to belittle the agricultural press and every farmer who sought to gain information thereby about his calling. Now the intelligent, progressive farmer could not get along without these harbingers of progress. Through their aid he may be said to reap without sowing—-he garners the net re- sults of the experience of thousands of other farmers and skillful in- vestigators without himself having to undergo costly and vexing ex- periments. The disposition to realize on this species of “reaping” may be called a “new method” for the reason that not more than one farmer in ten takes and reads agricultural papers. May be this statement ap- pears overdrawn? Mentally survey your own community: What per cent of those of your acquaintance can prove by their system of farming that they read agricultural papers? In our editorial rooms we receive a large number of agricultural exchanges, coming from all parts of America—without a single exception each and every one of them strenu- ously and persistently advocate the sheltering and proper care of farm implements. Recently, while making a ten-mile drive in a certain South- west Missouri county—one of the best, too, in the State—I noted the binders, mowers, plows, cultivators and other implements left in fence corners and other unsheltered places, and calculated their aggregate worth at conservative values—there were over $2,000 worth left out doors, to rust and rot away. Possibly some of you pure bred stock breeders would say that the owners of those implements are “scrub” farmers. Maybe they are—but the biggest display of unsheltered im- 190 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. plements I saw during that drive was on the farm of a pure bred stock breeder. However, I may say, parenthetically, that I don’t think he is in attendance at this meeting. SOILS AND SEEDS. In my boyhood days, back in the Buckeye state, | heard old farmers boast that a certain field had been cropped continuously in corn for forty years, but they would mournfully admit that their yield was “sorter nubbiny, kinder run out.” The “new methods” of modern agriculture teach that such a practice robs and impoverishes the soil; that unless we give back to it in some form an equivalent for the plant food taken from it we lessen its productive capacity—also, that if properly managed, the degree of soil fertility may not only be fully maintained while pro- ducing a maximum yield but may actually be increased. The aforesaid “double decade” corn grower, uninformed of the facts that like pro- duces like and that cereals allowed to follow their natural inclinations in- evitably tend to deterioration rather than improvement, selected his seed corn from his crib of nubbins—the variegated result was designated “kaliker corn’? and was just a little bit meaner than the parent stock You expert corn growers now talk about breeding corn, meaning there- by improving it by the careful selection of foundation stock (the seed), mating it with the requisite conditions of soil fertility and tilth and the application of known facts relative to pollination by means of which you maintain its pure bred standard and reasonably expect the off- spring will be just a little better than the parent stock in both quality and yield, and that the net results will more than compensate for the cost of their achievement. This is a “new method” of corn growing and it will apply with equal force to every other crop grown on the farm. NEW LIVE STOCK METHODS. When we contemplate the apparently well authenticated statement that less than two per cent of the live stock of the United States is pure bred, the remainder being grades and scrubs, the conclusion must obtrude itself that most of the hosts were absent from home when Mr. and Mrs. New Methods made their round of calls. The old method was to breed and continue to breed scrubs; the new method would banish the scrubs and supply their places with pure bred live stock, all kinds. Many, many years of patient, persistent effort, representing the natural life- time of two generations, supplemented by the expenditure of millions of dollars, have been devoted to the improvement of live stock in this country, and yet we face the humiliating fact that but one-fftieth of the LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. IQ!I task of scrub annihilation is accomplished. What's the matter? Why have we not made greater progress? A famous American general is credited with the declaration rel- ative to one of his campaigns that he would “fight it out on that line if it took all summer.” We have already devoted almost a century of summers to our plan of attack on scrubs and have only made a two per cent start. Evidently our plan of campaign is defective. Maybe our supposed new method is really an old, antiquated one, else why such slow progress? This paper is already becoming lengthy and older and wiser heads than mine have wrestled with this problem. I frankly con- fess my inability to suggest a new method that would promise to speedily and effectually surmount all of the old obstacles to universal live stock purification. I will, however, present a few suggestions born of close observation. “SCRUB” PURE BRED BREEDERS. That quaint old Englishman, Ben Johnson, said that “clothes make the man.” We know that appearances always count for more than their par value, either for or against a man. I said a while ago that the largest display of unsheltered implements I saw in a ten-mile drive, was on the farm of a pure bred breeder. That man was related to the “Bill Tumbledown” family and is a positive detriment to the crusade against scrubs. Why? Because the average farmer who has been breed- ing scrubs has come unconsciously to the belief that the owner of pure bred stock—‘‘thoroughbreds” he calls them—is a pure bred farmer, that all of his methods and operations should harmonize with his pretensions about his stock; when he finds that the animals with high-sounding pedi- grees are sO unpreposessing in appearance by reason of indifferent, “scrub” care as to look no better than his own mongrels, and that the surroundings of rickety, ragged fences, neglected buildings, foul and muddy lots; thickets of cockleburrs and the whole premises resembling the typical ““widder woman’s place,” his ardor to replace his scrubs with pure breds is very apt to cool off—his respect for pure bred stock and pure bred breeders undergoes a shrinkage and if he does buy some of those unfortunate animals he is apt to handle them by scrub methods, be- cause he is unable to see wherein Bill Tumbledown’s methods are any better than his own, and disappointment is bound to result. In the language of the street, Bill is a misfit. He is a scrub breeder of pure bred stock, a mixture of old and new methods in which the old predomi- nates and his influence is a wet blanket on the great industry with which he has aligned himself. The multiplicity of members of the Tum- bledown family is the greatest of all hindrances to the banishment of 192 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. scrubs. The new methods here applicable would be to furnish pure bred care and environment to pure bred stock—then the moral force of the combination would most certainly impress their great superiority over scrubs. INFLUENCE OF THE SHOW RING. Public sales of pure bred stock have become a popular means of selling the surplus and could be made to exercise a highly beneficent in- fluence. Unforfunately, however, they are often detrimental to the pure bred cause—again too many Tumbledowns. Scalawag and tail- ender stock, fop-heavy with pedigree but devoid of even ordinary in- dividual merit, that should have gone to the feed lot is presented as breed- ing stock. Here again the votary of scrubs who has come as a spectator draws invidious comparisons and gives audible utterances to his thoughts: ‘Them peddygreed critters ain’t a bit better than my scrubs.” The new method would be to not only rigidly exclude from the public sale ring all but really meritorious stock but to deny it registration as well. The record association should exercise a more rigid censorship over the quality of breeding stock for which they assume to stand sponsor. My subject leads on and on, but this paper is already too long. Let us reform. our plan of campaign, retrace our steps and start again by regenerating the scrub breeders—the men who assume to breed pure bred stock, while practicing scrub methods, then scrub live stock will lessen rapidly. WHAT HAS THE WORLD'S FAIR ACCOMPLISHED FOR MISSOURI? (tlon. Mat. W. Hall, Marshall.) Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: I believe the subject assigned to me is “‘What has the World’s Fair Accomplished for Missouri?” I want to say that I am glad to be in Columbia tonight and I am glad to undertake to make some sort of ad- dress in the University of the State of Missouri on this particular sub- ject. I am glad for the reasons that two of your citizens were very prominently connected with the World’s Fair. As to what this World’s Fair has accomplished for Missouri, no man at this time is able to know. Since I have been assigned this ques- tion, I have asked a great many people “What particular thing, above all others, in your judgment, has the World’s Fair done for Missouri?” JACKSON Crier No 4769. GRAND CHAMPION AT THE WORLDS FAIR 1904. BRED AND EXHIBITED BY L.L.FROST MIRABILE, MISSOURI. ~ Jackson Chief, 4759, the never beaten Chester-White of the world, winning the grand champion- ship prize at the World’s Fair, 1904, and $758 cash prizes, Bred and owned by Judge L. %. Frost, Mirabile, Missouri. LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. . 193 They have given me all sorts of answers. Some of them have said: “Why, it has advertised Missouri to the East, which never appreciated it before.” Others have said that “it has advertised Missouri, not only to the east, but to the civilized world, as she has never been advertised before.’ These things are good, I will admit, but there are other great things that this Fair has done for Missourt. This Fair has done somethings, some things it has not done. One thing it has done: this Fair enabled Missouri to discover your distinguished citizen, Walter Williams, and in spite of his extreme modesty, has forecd him to acknowledge the fact that he is the author of the best history of Missouri that has ever been written up to date, and that history, to- night, is not only scattered over every state in this glorious Union, but it is being read by the people of every civilized country on earth. But one thing this Fair has not accomplished, fellow citizens, and I rejoice in the fact that it has not, it has not made any change in the countenance of the man who conducts the train that runs from here out to the Wabash main line. From the cap that sits on his head to the shoes that are on his feet, there is a look and an appearance of satisfaction and content- ment. I think he is the best satisfied—the best contented man with the position he holds that I have ever seen in my life. He is cordial to every- body. He assists the ladies on and off the train and he is as well satis- fied as it is necessary for any man in this world to be. And what a great thing, fellow citizens, what a great thing, it is to be satisfied. And the greatest thing, in my judgment that this World’s Fair has done for Missouri is that it has satisfied Missourians with this, our own country. It has done more to make Missourians contented with Missouri than all other agencies put together in the last forty years. I think I have a right to speak on this question, for the reason that I journeyed over the western half of Missouri and Col. Waters down there journeyed over the eastern half of Missouri, organizing the several coun- ties in this State, looking to the getting out of the displays from these counties, and I say to you that I never understood, and I found the people in these counties did not understand any better than I did, the wonderful, wonderful possibilities of this great State of ours. I want to say to you that I found counties where men had been living for years and years, surrounded with peace and plenty and living in comfort—had simply stayed at home. They had looked on the same ridges, they had looked on the same trees and the same houses and the same people until things had become common to them. I have known numbers of these cases where these men in an unguarded moment priced their farms to some passerby and sold out at what they considered fabulous prices, A—13 194 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. thinking they would go to another state and better their condition. I have known Missourians to leave our State in the last four years, and after they, had looked around for a few weeks, go back to their original vine and shade tree and beg the man that had bought their farms to let them buy them back at an increased price, and when they were refused, sat down and wept. I thank God, as a Missourian, for the World’s Fair, if it has done nothing else than to satisfy our own people with our Own country and induced them to hold on to it. It has enabled Missouri to make the greatest display of her mineral resources that the world has ever seen. The people of our own State now know more about the possibilities of the mineral output in Missouri than they have here- tofore known, even of the Agricultural output in this State. In the Educational Department, in the Forest, Fisheries and Game, as in all the rest of the departments, no man ever saw from any State or country such a display as was made by Missouri. It enabled the farmers of Missouri to make the greatest Agricultural display that was ever seen or known at any of the great fairs of the world. And I want to say to you that when the Committee on Awards had completed their labors in the Agricultural building they came to me and said: “We have done for Missouri all that it is possible for us to do under the rules of this Exposition, but we realize that we have not done half enough.” Hal/ enough. “Because,” they said, ‘Missouri stands here absolutely in a class by herself; so much so that we, the members of the Group Jury are going to the Superior Jury and ask them to create a special place that Missouri may have some special recognition.”’ I want to say that while the farmers are responsible for this magnificent display—because we never could have made it in the world if the farmers of Missouri had not responded to our call—I want to say that they were as much sur-. prised when they came down there and saw what they had done as any- body else that visited that Exposition. We had on display about three thousand bushels of corn, the equal of which was never collected before under one roof. Another thing that the World’s Fair has enabled Missouri to do— some of that corn today is in every part of the civilized world. Missouri has corn today growing in South Africa. Early last spring there was a South African Boer farmer who came over to St. Louis to look after improved farm machinery. He came to our space and he greatly ad- mired our corn display. Down there they call it “the mealy cob.” He said, “It cost England millions of dollars. Our men would have it in their haversacks and when they stopped at night they would grind it up with-their little mills and we would make our gruel with it and would LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 195 cook our meat in it. There is nothing in it but what would make us strong and able to fight, and,” he said, “While I don’t blame you, still it is a fact that if the United States had not furnished England so much beef and so many mules, we would have whipped her in spite of fate.” That South African farmer said further: “The war has destroyed our horses. The English put explosives under our farm implements and blew them to pieces, but the great God that rules over the destinies of our people has given us plenty of coal in the bowels of the earth and we are getting it out. I have purchased two steam gang plows and I am going to ship them to South Africa and with these | am going to plow my land by steam.”” He owned six thousand acres of this African prairie. I said: ‘My friend—because | am your friend, as are all Missourians— when you get ready to ship your implements back to South Africa, come to the Missouri space. I want to take out some of the best seed corn in this space and I want you to carry it back to South Africa and plant it in the name of Missouri.” He came back and I picked out two barrels of the best corn I could find in the space and he took it back with him. ‘Their season is the reverse of ours, and it was planted the first of September and is growing today. That is another thing that the World’s Fair has enabled Missouri to do. It has not only enabled her to show the wonderful products of this wonderful State of ours, but it has also enabled her to show that she is a friend of oppressed and down-trodden humanity wherever that humanity exists. This subject, ladies and gentlemen, is a pleasant one to me. You will remember that when the proposition of the World’s Fair was first suggested, I favored that proposition. The people of Missouri responded to the call of the Missouri Legislature and generously appropriated a million dollars for Missouri to participate in that great enterprise. The Missouri Commission have up-to-date—(they have not finished )—spent about eight hundred thousand dollars of that million dollar appfopria- tion, and I want to say as a native born Missourian, that, to my mind, it is the best money that the State has ever expended. Do you believe me when I tell you that people have come to the Missouri space—(and you will pardon me, ladies and gentlemen, for speaking of the Agri- cultural space, for the reason that that is the only space that I had any thing to do with, and the people that came to that space are the only ones that I met. I do not want anybody to think that I want to boost the Agricultural display over the other Missouri displays, because it was the universal verdict of every lady and gentleman that I conversed with at the Exposition that—go where you would from the State Build- ing to any of her exhibits—that Missouri stood head and shoulders, in 196 : MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. every instance, over every other state, territory or nation that exhibited there)—during spring, summer and fall, people would come to our space in the Agricultural building from the eastern part of this country and some of them were so much astonished as to be almost angry, and they would exclaim, “Why, how does this come? What does this mean? We have never regarded Missouri as a great Agricultural country.” One man said to me: “This will do a great thing for Missouri. Why no- body thinks of Missouri like this back in our country. We have always regarded Missouri as a border state. We really back in our country when I first talked about coming out to the World’s Fair’—now this sounds fishy, but it happened—‘‘when I first talked about coming to the World’s Fair, my people told me: ‘You had better not go down there to Missouri. Some of those Missourians will kill you before you ever get back,’ and I confess to you that I was silly enough to have fears on that subject. But I have come and seen your display and I see as fine men and women here as I see in any part of the world; and this World’s Fair will be a great advertisement for Missouri, will cause a great flood of immigration to come into Missouri.’ I said: ‘Well, Missouri is here, they can come if they want to. But,’ I said, “let me tell you something about the characteristics of a Missourian. You will never find one of them that will beg you to come and settle among them. You are wel- come if you come and you are welcome to stay if you want to, and if you don’t want to stay, you are just as welcome to go away as you were to come.” He said: “Why are they that kind of people?’ I replied, “I can explain it to you.’ ‘‘Missourians spring from a race of pioneers that came over into this country in an early day, married, as my father and mother did, as mere girls and boys, and very frequently journeyed over into the wilderness here on horseback bringing their worldly possessions along with them. They located on a good strip of timber, by a good spring, built them a cabin and began life and lived happy and contented and raised a large family. They have always known that they had a good thing, they have always been satisfied with their surroundings and you never see one of them on a housetop, blowing a horn to attract some- body’s attention to get him to come and settle here by the side of them; but still, if he comes, he is welcome.” I further said: “These people that you find in Missouri come from such stock as that, and while we have the best people that the sun shines on, while we have the most hospitable people in the world, they won’t beg you to abide with them, but you are welcome if you want to come. And I say to you now, as a Missourian, if you want to change your home, I tell you to come to Missouri and LIVE STOCK BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 197 in any part of this great State you will find such a civilization as I have described to you.” Let me tell you, fellow citizens, a little story of pioneer life I got hold of in my travels. I was down in Rolla and I was talking about Missouri, as was my business at that time, and when I finished a tall, grey-whiskered man !aid his hand in mine and said “I like to hear a man talk about Missouri as you have talked about it.” I thanked him, of course, and we drifted to one side and sat down and he told me a story, and I am going to trespass on your patience to tell it to you. He said: “Way back in the early days of Missouri two brothers journeyed over into this State and settled near the Missouri river above St. Louis. The older brother was to take care of the farm while the younger brother was to look after the housekeeping, cooking, etc. They lived that way for several years and did fairly well, but one day the younger brother who had had a piece of meat to burn while cooking—I suppose a stick of wood had burned in two, turned the kettle over and poured the con- tents on the ground—got up a demurrer. He said to his brother: “We have been living along this way for severai years, but this is not the way to live. One of us must get married.’ The other brother said: ‘All right. You are the youngest. Go and hunt you a wife. I realize that we can live better and be better men with a housekeeper than we are now. The younger one said: ‘No, you are the oldest. It is your duty to get married first.’ So they discussed it until Saturday morning. They - knew where there was a pioneer family living across the country con- taining a number of girls. So on Saturday morning the older brother started, traveling by the points of the compass, because there was no road in those days. And when he got over to the house, first his horse was put up, then he must come in and have some supper. After supper he and the father of the family walked into an adjoining room and sat down while the wife and daughters were doing the dishes, etc., and he said to the father: ‘I have come over here to see if you had any objection to my marrying your daughter.’ The old gentleman said—‘Well, I don’t know. What does the girl think about it? ‘Oh,’ the young fellow answered, ‘I am not acquainted with your girls at all. I felt that my first duty was to talk to you on that subject.’ The father answered: ‘Well, if my daughter is willing, I certainly have no objections,’ and he turned and spoke to his wife through the open door, and said: ‘Send Mary in here.’. Mary came in and he gave her a formal introduction to the man. He said: ‘Mary, here is a man come up here and wants to marry you. What do you think about it? ‘I have not thought about it at all.’ “Well, you think about it till tomorrow morning and after breakfast you can 198 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. give your answer.’ ‘he dishes were done up. The family sat and con- versed until retiring time and the next morning Mary was called’on for her reply. She said she was willing to marry the man. The father was a justice of the peace, and he said: ‘If you want to get married, I will marry you this morning.’ The young man said: ‘I don’t want to marry so soon as that. I want to go home and tell my brother and we want to add what conveniences we can to the premises, in our crude way, and if agreeable to everybody, I will go home and come back in two weeks and be married then.’ It was agreed, he went home; he and his brother did as he said and at the end of the two weeks he came back and the next morning they were married. He got on his horse and rode to the stile blocks, his girl wife leaped on behind him and their bridal tour was forty miles through the wilderness back to his home. The sequel to that story is they lived a long, happy and prosperous life, raising a large family and today as a result of that union, their grandson is a professor in the School of Mines at Rolla, Missouri, Professor Wilkerson.” This marriage of real pioneer life seems a very crude marriage to us, but, ladies and gentlemen, fellow citizens and Missourians, I am going to take the stand on this platform in the year 1905, and say that there was more sanctity, more manhood and womanhood and more real marriage in that marriage than there is in half the marriages of today. Now, ladies and gentlemen, I have talked to you long enough. I do not know just what the future of Missouri will be, but my ideal is a very high one now. I do not know:what my own future may be, nor do I know that I am specially concerned on that point, but I know that I was born in Missouri, the mother and father who gave me birth are buried in Missouri and when life’s journey is over with me, there is one wish above all others that I now make, and that is, that I sleep in her bosom and mingle my ashes with her dust. I thank you. the el MM Det | ea aie) Laelia 7 Bail he cii, Liieoabihts THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. HELD IN ST. LOUIS, 1904. SOME FACTS ABOUT THE WORLD'S GREATEST EXPOSITION—-MISSOURI IN COMPARISON. AGRICULTURE, Agriculture at the Exposition.—If there was one particular in which the Louisiana Purchase Exposition excelled all other expositions it was in the beauty and magnitude of its agricultural display. Agri- culture is the foundation of all arts, sciences and industries. The only human occupation, which from its very nature bears an inseparable relation to the State. Hence there was nothing more fitting than that the greatest display of the greatest exposition in all the history of expositions, should have been devoted to agriculture. The Agricultural Building —The building itself, with its twin palace of Horticulture, was badly located. It is the general verdict today that the Agricultural and Horticultural buildings should have been placed directly west of the Transportation building. The incon- venient position of the Agricultural building acted only as a tem- porary hindrance, for when its glories received their proper adver- tisement, the crowd thronging its aisles was always large. Although severely plain in architectural style, the building was graceful enough when viewed from a distance. It was 1,600 feet by 500 feet, and so immense that its interior did not reveal the fact that its south door was nearly twenty feet higher than the north entrance. The building contained a systematic arrangement of every exhibit pertaining to agriculture from the earliest day down to the present time. Fully one-fourth of the space was devoted to farm implements and ma- chinery, and appliances whereby farm products are manufactured into the thousand and one things necessary to our daily life. This section of the building included fertilization and irrigation displays. Special Displays —The appliances and methods used in agriculture were also exhibited in many of the special displays, notably those of cotton, tobacco, dairying and the manufacture of food stuffs. All through these exhibits corn was specialized. The grains from each 200 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. state in the Union were given prominent places. The special corn | exhibit not only included the best specimens from every state, but demonstrated the manufacture of corn into all of its products and by- products. If this exhibit had showed only what could be made from corn, it would have been worth months of study. The products and by-products of corn form a varied group consisting of starch, glucose, gum, dextrine, anhydrous and grape sugar, syrup, corn oil, corn rub- ber, corn oil cake, corn oil meal, gluten meal, canned corn, grits, samp, hominy, malt, whiskey, beer, dry wines of high alcoholic strength, alcohol, fusel oil, stover, ensilage, shucks, fodder and cobs. The same method of exhibit and treatment was given the canes, the beets and the sorghums. The best processes for dairying and cheese making were exemplified in a model dairy. Sections were also de- voted to meats, fishes and vegetables—in fact to every known thing to eat or drink. Anda sectien not of the least interest to the farmer, showed every insect with an essay upon its habits, and a herbarium of the diseases most common to plant life in America. The Exhibits and Exhibitors—The Agricultural building contained 12,056 exhibits of all sorts. These exhibits, private and otherwise, came from every country in the world, and exploited completely the products of each country and the industries which depended upon those products. The following countries had spaces: Argentine, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Ceylon, China, Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark, Egypt, France, the French colonies, Germany, German East Africa, Great Britain, Greece, Gautemala, Hayti, Hon- duras, Hungary, Italy, Jamaica (unofficial), Japan, The Netherlands, New South Wales, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Peru, Porto Rico, Portu- gal, Roumania, San Salvador, Siam, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (unofficial), Uruguay and Venezuela. Russia’s exhibit was in the Varied Industries building, and the East India exhibit, consisting mainly of teas, was in the East India building. The participation of these countries contributed largely to the beauty of the building. Among the foreign exhibits from the western world, there were worthy of special praise, the Argentine Republic, which, for corn, wheat and cattle, is destined in the future to be our chief competitor; Mexico with her gorgeous display of corn, colfee, rubber and semi-tropical products, and Canada, with a most perfect exploitation of her wonderland ; the great Northwest with its wheat, grasses and cattle. The central of the three corn towers in the Missouri Exhibit. This is a replica of the Louisiana Monument and is made of varied colored corn. The corn in this monument was furnished by every one of the 114 counties in the State. THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 201 THE UNITED STATES. The Participation of the States.—Thirty-five states and territories participated in the agricultural display, the chief exhibits of which were as follows: Arizona—Vegetables, weol and grasses. Arkansas—Corn, cotton, vegetables and grasses. California—Vegetables, canned fruits, wines, fruits and brandies. Colorado—Vegetables, peas, beans, grasses and fruit. Connecticut—Tobacco and corn. Georgia— Vegetables, syrups, whiskey and corn. Idaho—Grains and grasses. Ilinois—Cereals, corn and corn breeding. Indiana—Collective exhibit of edible products. Iowa—Cereals and grasses. Kansas—Seeds, vegetables, flour, syrup, flax. Kentucky—Tobacco, grains, grasses and whiskey. Louisiana—Fertilizers, tobacco, cotton, sugar cane and vegetables. Maryland—Cereals, canned goods, tobacco. Massachusetts—Market gardening methods and tobacco. Michigan—Cereals, grasses, wool, beet sugar and preserved fruits. Minnesota—Cereals and butter. Missouri—Corn, grains, grasses, wool, cotton, tobacco, vegetables. Montana—Grasses, grains, vegetables and wool. Nebraska—Grains and corn. Nevada New Mexico—Angora goat fleeces, corn, honey. Flour, cotton, wool, honey. New York—Cereals, butter, and seeds. North Carolina—Tobacco, leaf and manufactured. Oklahoma—Flour, broom corn, flax and wines. Oregon—Corn, grain, grasses, dairying. Pennsylvania—Cereals, gtains, grasses, tobacco and wool. Rhode Island—Potatoes, theoretical gardening. South Dakota—Corn, grain, grasses and butter. Tennessee—Peanuts, tobacco and cereals. Texas—Seeds, corn, cotton, flour and wine. Utah—Grains, vegetables, grasses, honey. Virginia—Grains, grasses, tobacco. Washington—Cereals, butter, hops. Wisconsin—Seeds, grains, erasses, butter. Artistic Exhibits of the States—The states had two kinds of ex- hibits—the collective and the special. Not every state made a special 202 - MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. exhibit; but each exhibit, whether special or collective, was of the highest order of artistic excellence. The following special exhibits in the main aisle were masterpieces of the art, the result of thirty years experience in exposition making: A pedestal of many colored corn. Indiana—A corn obelisk. Missouri—The celebrated corn palace, by far the most beautiful of special exhibits, which will be described under “In Missouri.” Nebraska—Ruby red corn house, Maryland—Corn peristyle. Mississippi—King cotton, an heroic cotton figure, fifty feet high. California—Golden Temple of Bacchus, flanked by four golden wine casks. Virginia Georgia—A log cabin. Colorado—Sugar beet pavilion. Louisiana—Sugar cane with sugar mill. Tennessee—Tobacco house. Maryland—Indian tobacco statue. Connecticut—Leaf-tobacco display. North Carolina—Tobacco seed house. Kentucky—Tobacco leaf display house. The headquarters of the various states on the spaces alloted to them were equally beautiful. As a rule, staff work prevailed, orna- mented with grasses, seeds and corn. Prizes on Collective Exhibits—The following were the grand prize awards on collective exhibits: Missouri—Grasses and corn. Ilowa—Spring wheat, timothy, red clover and buckwheat. Texas—Sugar. Kentucky Whiskey and tobacco. Wisconsin—Rye, barley, dairy school exhibit and garden seed. Georgia—Grain, field peas, tobacco. 3 Minnesota—Wheat breeding experiments in Blue Stem wheat. Kansas—Wheat, barley, red clover, grains and Kaffir corn. Utah—Irrigation exhibit, seeds and cereals. Indian Territory—Corn. Nebraska—Corn, sheaf and threshed grains, wild and tame grasses and twenty-six products of corn. Pennsylvania—Tobacco, grasses, Delaine wool. New York—Grains, seeds, canned goods, manufactured tobacco, wines, butter and preserves, THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 203 Illinois—State University Exhibit, Corn Breeders,’ Corn Grow- ers’ Associations, Illinois Farm Bats: Corn Exhibit, glucose, grains, grasses, seeds. California—Collective exhibit of eighteen counties, fruit, grasses, grains, peas, beans and wheat. The Butter and Cheese Display—One exhibit in the Agricultural building which speedily became famous was the butter statuary. Artistically this display begged no favor because its figures were moulded in butter. The participating states with their displays, were as follows: . Minnesota—The discovery of the falls of St. Anthony by Father Hennepin, by J. K. Daniels. Three figures in an Indian canoe, made of 1,000 pounds of neeueet average score butter—Awarded a Grand Prize. Indiana—A group symbolic of cost and profit. Nebraska—The horn of plenty—a cornucopia pouring out golden butter nuggets. South Dakota—Butter flowers from native meadows. North Dakota—An equestrian statue of President Roosevelt. California—The symbolical wolves. Oregon—A creamery scene. Washington—Milking time—the maid milking the cow and feed- ing the cat. Missouri—The old and the new way in dairy methods, an ebee: ate artistic production containing three thousand pounds of creamery butter, made for the State by the Blue Valley Creamery Company. The cow from which one of the figures was modeled, was subse- quently sold for $2,350. Awarded a Grand Prize. New York—Liberty Bell and a medallion of President Roose- velt. Awarded a Gold Medal. Kansas—Dairy girl at work in creamery. Illinois—Statues of Grant, Lincoln, D. R. Francis, J. V. C. Skiff and Frederick W. Taylor, Chief World’s Fair Department of Agri- - culture. lowa—Dairy house and statue of John Stewart. Connecticut—Regular dairy display in small packages. Wisconsin—Milkmaid and cow—Awarded a Gold Medal. The prizes awarded these displays were not given for dairy ex- cellence, for in most cases the butter used was of low grade. The prizes were awarded solely upon artistic beauty. Missouri in Comparison with Other States——In addition to her corn 204 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. palace which was a special display put up at the request of the De- partment of Agriculture, Missouri occupied by far the most promi- nent place allotted to any purely agricultural state. Of the corn growing states of the Louisiana Purchase, Missouri’s exhibit was de- cidedly the best. ‘The display by states in the Agricultural building cost a small fortune. The following table is intended to be only ap- proximate, as the authorities in charge would not announce definite figures. South Dakota, $10,000; North Dakota, $12,000; Colorado, $13,000; Kansas, $30,000; Nebraska, $30,000; Iowa, $35,000; Min- mesota,. 63'5,000'-< California, $.0 020.25 ; Missouri, $80,459.74. Mis- souri appropriated $100,000 for the agricultural display, $70,000 of which had been expended at the close of the Exposition, $60,000 for actual exhibits and their installation, and $10,000 for salaries and incidental expenses. The Display Artistically and Otherwise—The facts about the Missouri display are almost as interesting as the exhibit itself. It required 6,000 bushels of especially selected corn, 200 bushels of grains and grasses, and two tons of grass, wheat, oats, rye and straw to put up the towers, friezes, facades, pagodas and pictures which made the five blocks east of the main aisle the most beautiful spot in the Agricultural building. The Missouri exhibit had one advantage over every other in the building, in that its beauties were not ob- scured by staff work. The five blocks of exhibits were made up of the real material produced on the farms and in the orchards and gardens of the State and the arrangement was both logical and practical. One feature of the display which attracted immediate attention was the two immense pictures on the west wall, in the State’s sec- tion, the 6,000 acre corn field af David JRankin’s Atchison county farm and the Model Missouri Farm. These pictures were each 35 by 15 feet and were made entirely of grains and grasses. They were built by the great French-Canadian decorator and artist, Mr. J. D. Fortier - of Toronto, and were the most gorgeous pieces of work of this char- acter ever attempted. They cost the Missouri Commission $3,000. Mr. Fortier also assisted in the other decorative work. Within the staff work which surrounded, the entire space of Mis- souri’s exhibit were smaller pictures forming a progressive history of the art of agriculture, each picture made from grain, grasses, mosses, corn and parts of corn. The pictures in this richly tinted mural group represented every phase of agricultural life, from the most primitive days down to the present time; the old way, the new way, fields, farm work, and cattle in green pastures. THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 205 Two other artistic features of the exhibit were the two corn towers, one of white and one of yellow ears, each 38 feet high with the Louisiana Purchase Monument 45 feet high between them, and two flags, the stars and stripes, and the Louisiana Purchase Emblem, made of undyed, many-colored shucks and blades of corn. The Central Corn Palace, to which reference has already been made, would have been in itself a creditable State display. Sitxy-five feet high and 40 feet in base diameter, it was, next to the Matchless Festival Hall, the most graceful dome on the exposition grounds. It was not only an admirable lotinging room for tired Missourians, and a convenient meeting place for everybody in the great building, but it was worthy of note as containing the very finest specimens of all varieties of Missouri corn and a sample of nearly every agricultural product which the State produces. The Missouri Commission and the Exhibit.—The average visitor in the Agricultural building, farmer though he may have been, had only a general idea of the plan pursued in organizing. the working force, gathering the materials for the State’s display and erecting the artistic part of it in the building. Every expenditure for every pur- pose made by the State at the exposition was under the direction of the Missouri Commission appointed by Governor A. M. Dockery, con- sisting of the following members: M. T. Davis, President; F. J. Moss, Vice-President; B. H. Bonfoey, Secretary; J. H. Hawthorne, treasurer; L. F. Parker, J. O. Allison, D. P..Stroup, N. H. Gentry and W.H. Marshall. J. O. Allison was Commissioner of Agriculture for Missouri. The Missouri Agricultural exhibit was under the direct super- vision of Dr. H. J. Waters, who is Dean of Missouri Agricultural Col- lege and one of the most active members of the State Board of Agri- culture. The inception of the general plan of the exhibit is due to Dr. Waters’ knowledge of scientific and practical agriculture, together with his earnest desire to place the agriculture of the State in the position that its importance demands. Hon. Mat. W. Hall and Col. G. W. Waters, both experienced and successful farmers, were the able assistants in this department and too much credit cannot be given each for the able assistance rendered. To the Allen Decorating Com- pany of St. Louis, chief decorators for the Missouri Commission, is due the fine artistic effect of this superb exhibit. -After months of arduous labor in collectintg and installing the exhibit, Dr. Waters resigned his position and went to Europe for a year’s study. The Commission exercised the best judgment in select- ing Hon. Mat. W. Hall of Saline county to succeed Dr. Waters. Mr. 206 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. Hall has made an admirable officer, able, courteous and an indefati- gable worker where the State’s interests were concerned. He and his chief clerk, Mr. Dudley, have worked ten hours a day at clerical tasks for months. The Missouri Commission, individually, deserves like praise. On December Ist, President M. T. Davis had not been in a half dozen of the fair’s main buildings, so exacting had been the duties of his office. The Display—Its Collection.—The materials for Missouri’s display came from various sources. ‘There were, for instance, 345 private ex- hibits. These exhibits comprehended everything produced in the State. The greater part of the exhibit, especially corn, was collected at county corn shows held for the purpose in co-operation with the Farmers’ institutes conducted by the State Board of Agriculture. At these corn shows a premium of $50 was offered for the best corn, the corn to belong to the Missouri Commission. Missouri’s Great Variety.—In the variety of the products of the soil Missouri €asily surpassed any state or nation in the world. The State not only produces variety, but produces abundantly and of the highest quality. In the year 1902 Missouri produced more bushels of corn per acre than any State in the Union; for three years, 1902-3-4, Missouri produced, according to Uncle Sam’s reports, an average yield per acre of 5 bushels more than Kansas, 22 bushels more than Ne- braska and 1.7 more than Iowa. In both quality of fiber and amount of yicld per acre Missouri’s cotton fields of the southern counties excel that of any other State. The great variety of products adapted to the State is clearly shown by the following list of exhibits, all of which are profitably raised: Corn, oats, wheat, alfalfa, rye, millet, flax, bluegrass, Kaffir corn, popcorn, sugar corn, buckwheat, potatoes, white clover, red clover, alsike clover, crimson clover, sweet clover, meadow fescue, hemp, cowpeas, Canada field peas, soy beans, blue stem, broom corn, sorghum seed and syrup, sunflower seed, egg plant, castor bean, cab- bage, asparagus, pumpkins, beets, onions, rhubarb, wines, apples, and other fruits, including 430 different kinds, melons, cantaloupes, tim- othy, clover seed, sweet potatoes, tobacco, navy beans, turnips, cider, squash, cucumbers, peppers, emmer, radishes, ginseng, brandy, honey and many others of less importance. The Prizes and Awards.—There is a mistaken idea _ prevalent throughout the State concerning the exposition awards, what they are, what they represent, and the methods by which they were given. We wish that it were otherwise, for we dislike very much to say it—the THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 207 awards are not to be taken too seriously. The awards were divided into four classes: a grand prize, the highest award made, which was simply a diploma; 2nd, a gold medal worth $65; 3rd, a silver medal, worth $20, and 4th, a bronze medal worth $3. These awards were not prizes in the ordinary interpretation of that term in that they were not exclusively conferred. They represented orders of excellence, which to the uninformed, will explain the seemingly paradoxical circum- stance of any article having several medals of the same rank. The awards were made by two juries, the jury of recommendation and the superior, or jury of appeal. The work of these juries did not al- ways meet with the popular approval. One thing is certain; the millions who marched through the seven miles of aisles in the Agri- cultural building, by common consent, gave Missouri many times the awards she received at the hands of the powers that were—up stairs in the Agricultural building. For list of awards see report of Missouri Commission on another page. HORTICULTURE. The Building—The Horticultural building was located immediate- ly south of the Agricultural building. Although one of the most in- accessible structures on the exposition grounds, it was admirably adapted to the purposes for which it was erected.” It was the best lighted of all the exposition palaces. Some State Displays ——The Horticultural building was beautiful as a whole chieiiy because the various State displays were more nearly uniform than in any other building. Missouri, Mississippi and Cali- fornia possessed the notable displays. The pecan horse of Mississippi attracted its share of attention. California’s display was elaborate, costly and imposing with its many facades of Mission architecture. The fine, actual picture of the Riverside Orange growing country was, next to the.two farm scenes in Missouri’s agricultural exhibit, the finest thing in the exposition of its sort. The Missouri Display occupied 7,700 square feet of the building, and was located advantageously, immediately in front of the main entrance. ‘The exhibit spaces were surrounded by arches and facades of white staff work, with fruit and flower designs everywhere. On space 29 was the crowning feature in the building—Missouri’s ex- hibit. A pagoda with small fountains at the ends and center capable of holding twelve stands of fruit. The name “Missouri” in gold let- ters was engraved on the facades. Around the exhibit space was a miniature elevated railroad track and train from the State’s fruit 208 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. country. All around were the tables, jars and plates, ladened with the ° best the State can produce. Varieties—‘On tables, in glass jars, cases and on specially de- signed plates, Missouri’s display of fruit occupied this large space. Every inch of space was filled with the finest fruit. Nearly two hundred varieties ot apples were shown and for nearly five months fresh apples were daily upon the tables, while apples from cold storage were shown for the entire seven months of the exposition period. Five hundred bushels of apples were given away on Apple Day, October 4. Seventy-two varieties of apples were shown, with fresh peaches on the tables daily from June 15 to December 1. Over sixty bushels of different varieties were exhibited at one time an un- exampled picture. On August 15, Peach Day, five hundred bushels, a full car load, were distributed to visitors. Two thousand plates of pears, of forty-eight varieties were shown from August to December 1. Among the other fruits shown were one thousand plates of grapes with 124 varieties, one thousand plates of strawberries with sixty- four varieties, five hundred plates of cherries with twenty-four varie- ties, four hundred plates of plums with thirty-two varieties, sixty plates of apricots with six varieties, twenty plates of nectarines with two varieties, one hundred and sixty plates of quinces with six varie- ties, three hundred plates of gooseberries with eight varieties, one hundred plates of currants with six varieties, two hundred plates of raspberries with twenty-four varieties, three hundred plates of black- berries with eight varieties, one hundred plates of dewberries with two varieties, twenty-four plates of mulberries with four varieties, one hundred and twenty plates of huckleberries with two varieties, one hundred plates of persimmons, pawpaws, crab apples and thorn appies with eighteen varieties. Ten show cases of Missouri nuts, illustrating forty-eight varieties. There were two thousand four hundred jars of fruit in solution, illustrating four hundred and thirty varieties. Altogether six hundred and ninety-four varieties of fresh fruits were shown, a display unequaled by any state or country. . Out of the one hundred and fourteen counties of Missouri, ninety-six were actually represented by fruit. The Missouri Horticultural Society, the indi- vidual fruit grower and horticultural department of the Misseuri Agricultural College contributed materially to the sources of the exhibit. The exhibit was beautifully displayed and was especially popular. On its educational side it taught the adaptability of varie- ties to particular localities, the value of soils and subsoils, elevation, cultivation, pruning and spraying, packing and marketing and cold storage, and various points which confront every fruit grower.” Missouri's Horticultural Exhibit occupied 6,600 square feet of space and embraced every variety of fruits and nuts produced in the State. i) THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 209 Of the different varieties of fruits displayed the following were most popular in the order named: Apples—Jonathan, Gano, Ben Davis, York and Winesap. Peaches—Elberta, Buck, Old Mixon, Salway, Champion and Family Favorite. Pears—Keiffer, Bartlett, Duchess. Grapes—Concord, Worden, Moore’s Early, Niagara and Newton’s Virginia. Strawberries—Warfield, Crescent, Haverland, Bubach, Jessie and ‘Parker Earl. Plums—Burbank, Wild Goose and Damson. The cost of the display was $51,667.20. The horticultural board, consisting of Hon. L. A. Goodman, C. H. Dutcher, W. G. Gano, W. P. Flournoy and J. C. Whitten, deserve a great deal of credit for the beautiful Missouri exhibit. Missourt im Comparison.—Missouri easily outranked the other Louisiana Purchase states. She more than held her own with Cali- fornia, outranking her in variety. But there was one state display which ought to have furnished feod for thought to all of the fertile states of the Mississippi valley, and that state was Connecticut. The Connecticut display consisted entirely of pictures exploiting the beauty and perfection of the state’s landscape gardening and park making. The lesson taught by the Connecticut exhibit, namely, the art and the necessity of doing things well, will one day be learned in this section; and when it is learned there will not be a bare nor an ugly spot in all Missouri’s 69,700 square miles. COTTON. Missouri Cotton.—That the quality of the cotton grown in Mis- souri is of the very best is proved by the fact that the only bale of Missouri cotton exhibited received a grand prize for its high standard of excellence. The exhibit was made by Mr. W. N. Burns, of Gibson, Dunklin county. The State produced in 1904, on 74,988 acres, a total yield of 24,- 451,690 pounds of lint cotton, valued at $2,272,660. Dunklin county produced 6o per cent of the total for the State. It may not be gener- ally known, but it is true, nevertheless, that in quality and length of fiber and average yield per acre, Southeast Missouri excels the other states of the Union. For list of awards in horticulture see report of Missouri Com- mission on another page. A—14 210 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. DAIRYING. (From the Report of the Missouri Commission.) The history of dairying in Missouri is not unlike that of other coun- tries. It’s a story of early obscurity and future prominence. It’s an old story and yet like the old, old story of love that for six thousand years has been whispered in the ears of millions of willing listeners, and mil- lions more of impatient, anxious mortals are waiting for it to be told over and over again to them, it is ever refreshing and acceptable to all. of the people of some countries and some of the people of all countries. Since the persistent wandering of a nation of people, thousands of years ago, for forty years in the wilderness, to keep from getting into HOLSTEIN BULL “SARCASTIC LAD.” Champion aged bull and grand champion, all ages, St. Louis, 1904. Now owned by Illinois Agricultural Pxperiment Station. a dairy country where they would have to milk, history has repeated itself many times and the favorable conditions that have existed in dif- ferent sections for doing a profitable dairy business has been disregarded for the promotion of some other branch of agriculture less profitable. THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 2i1 Like all other countries engaged in dairying, Missouri required a practical illustration of the benefits to be derived from an active interest in this particular branch of agriculture, before the industry was nur- tured and fostered to any great extent. The resources of Missouri were so varied and so extensive and pronounced in all of them, the faithful Missouri cow was neglected for the Missouri mule. The production of milk was neglected for the raising of beef. The manufacture of butter was of no consequence compared with the raising of corn. Instead of cheese factories, the country abounded in tobacco barns. Finally the people of this great commonwealth “were shown.” Their attention was called to the fact that this was the best climate in the world for obtain- ing the greatest results in dairying; that Missouri possessed the most luxuriant growth of grass and the best quality of any State in the Union; that our country was well watered, and that all of the conditions were favorable for making this an ideal dairy country in which the business might be carried on with a greater profit than in any other, country. The evidence was sufficient and in three or four years Mis- sourl grass was being converted into milk, Missouri milk was being made into butter and cheese. The cattle on a thousand hills were high grade milk cows. The wonderful crops of grain and roughness (suit- able for the production of milk) that never failed were sold to the high- est market in all the country, and sold for cash to the Missouri mortgage lifter, the faithful dairy cow. ‘The outcome of this dairy sentiment and the inauguration of this business was the establishment of modern creameries in Missouri, among them the largest creamery in the world, the building of dairy barns, of which Missouri boasts the finest in the world, the erection of silos, the changing of corn land into pastures, the breeding of better stock, the making of better roads, the building of bet- ter houses, the beautifying and adorning of rural homes, and the encour- agement of an enormous immigration by those people engaged in dairy- ing, seeking the country where the largest amount of milk could be pro- duced at the least cost and with the least labor. The Missouri farmer had carefully considered the matter. With his characteristic, conservative and careful disposition, he investigated the proposition thoroughly and, when his mind was settled, when he decided that dairying was the thing, he went at it right, and by his actions he said, “We will set an example worthy of imitation.”’ He accepted up-to-date methods. He bought the best cows. He bred for butter, for milk, or for cheese, according to the demands of his particular market. The men who lived close to St. Louis, Hannibal, Kansas City, or St. Joseph, and other cities, and were willing to sell 212 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. all of their milk, prepared to furnish their respective places with milk for family use, and the consequences—Train loads of good, pure, unadul- terated milk may be seen going into the larger cities, and car loads and wagon loads into the smaller places every morning. The pure quality of this milk increased the consumption, and with the increased demand the price got better and the dairyman felt com- pensated for early rising and for the work necessary to prepare his product for market. The man who lived farther from market, and the man who wanted his milk to raise calves and pigs, the man that used to be entirely left because of his location, was not forgotten. In the new order of things he was well taken care of. He was provided with a good market, and JERSEY COW “OONAN OF RIVERSIDE,” 69773. Official record for seven days is 355.4 pounds of milk, which produced 34 pounds 8 ounces of butter. This photograph taken in her fifteenth year. Owned by Dr. C. E. Still Kirksville, Mo. every day the roads were lined with light wagons that glistened with milk cans full of good, rich cream on its way to the nearest railroad station, to be shipped to some large centralized creamery in Kansas City, St. Joseph, Hannibal, or some other enterprising Missouri city. Thousands of hand separators were sold. The cream was taken out of the milk while fresh, and the clean, warm skim milk was used ae THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 213 to raise good calves; and Missouri became a wonderful example of the many profits in dairying. Missouri sunshine, Missouri water, Missouri grass, Missouri feed, are all being used to produce milk, out of which an immense amount of butter and cheese is being made and the by-products go to raise calves and make pork. The size of Missouri, its climate, its location, the fav- orable conditions, all go to make it the future “Promised Land” of America, the central butter market of the world. Missouri has 750,000 to 800,000 dairy cows, and at the same time has sunshine and water and grass and feed and room enough to support 10,000,000. S Missouri’s experiment station, which is in connection with the State University at Columbia, has a dairy building second to none in the United States, and the influence of the work done there is being felt to a marked degree all the time. Some remarkable records have been made by Missouri dairymen. Among these might be mentioned Mr. Coleman, of Pettis county, who averaged from seven cows, in 1903, 400 pounds of butter each. He fed the skim milk to hogs, and after paying for all the feed given to his cows and hogs, he had a net profit of $850 from the proceeds. A Nodaway county man reports making $6,000 in six years on forty acres in the dairy business, and started absolutely without any capital. Goodrich Bros., of Henry county, have a herd of thirty cows that average 375 pounds of butter a year. Mr. Koontz, of Jasper county, has a herd of twenty-five to thirty cows that has averaged for several years nearly 400 pounds of butter a year. Hosmer & Son, of Marshfield, has a herd of seventy-five cows that averaged them last year over 350 pounds of butter, one cow making 560 pounds. Mr. Schelpman, of Greene county, realized last year from his herd of twenty-five cows over $125 a head. Besides these there are hundreds of others of the same kind, of records, all of which go to show the adaptability of Missouri for suc- cessful dairying, and is sufficient explanation of why so much interest is being taken in the business all over the State. This interest is universal because the entire State is adapted to dairying. There is no section where conditions are unfavorable and there is no section that, to any marked degree possesses advantages over the rest of the State. Missouri, as a whole, is a dairy state, and the 214 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. possibilities in every county for the production of milk in large quan- tities at a minimum cost, are unsurpassed anywhere in the world. The peculiar’ conditions that exist in Missouri favorable to the dairyman makes him fearless of competition, because he knows there is no country where they can produce a pound of butter cheaper than he can here. This is not all that interests him. He is convenient to a good market. The very large manufacturing, commercial, and railroad interests of Missouri, her educational advantages as shown in academies, seminaries, and universities almost without number, together with the advantages of a good healthy climate, have all gone to make a large population in our towns and cities. These are all consumers and each additional one has increased the outlet and improved the market for the producer. Besides this, Mis- sourl’s market for dairy products is enhanced because of its proximity to a section where the resources of the people are in other lines, and where they depend on some other country for their butter and cheese. ART IN BUTTER. Missouri’s butter exhibit at the Louisiana Purchase Exposition is the greatest exhibit in its line the world ever saw and is regarded as one of the prominent attractions at this most wonderful World’s Fair. The Missouri Commission expended in the installation of this ex- hibit nearly ten thousand dollars and it is not only of wonderful mag- nitude, but shows in every detail the workmanship of a master artist. It tells a story that has not only interested those who have seen it, but in addition has impressed those interested with the importance of this branch of agriculture. Hundreds of thousands of people have seen this exhibit and the verdict has been universally the same—“A won- derful exhibit.” Hundreds of people have expressed themselves as be- ing fully compensated for the expense of a trip to the World’s Fair in ~ this exhibit alone, even by some as far away as London, England; Edin- burgh, Scotland, and Gouda, Holland. In this impressive story so beautifully told in butter, through the skill of the sculptor, Mr. Neilsen of St. Louis, there is more than ap- pears on the face of it. Like a western mirage, there is reflected a won- derful and attractive picture in which can be seen a country that has reached the highest state of agricultural development; and a million and a half people on the farm enjoying all the comforts and luxuries that come with prosperity and success, as well as two millions of people in the cities of Missouri being furnished with the purest dairy products fresh from the farm and the factory. This picture has been engraved on the tablet of the memory of those THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 215 who have seen it, never to be effaced or grow dim. And as they go to their homes in every quarter of the globe, its influence will be felt and it will always be a reminder that a cordial welcome and a happy home awaits those who desire to cast their lot and spend their lives in a land of milk and ‘honey. In making a very liberal appropriation for the Dairy Department at the World’s Fair, the Missouri Commission had in mind strictly a dairy exhibit; not only a work of art to be admired by the hundreds of thousands that would see it, but to impress our people with the impor- tance of this branch of agriculture, tell our visitors what was being done now and show to the world the wonderful possibilities and golden opportunities along this line in the great commonwealth of Missouri. Their work in this direction has been completed. The great crowds of people who have seen this exhibit and into whose hands this little pamphlet may fall, must decide whether or not their effort has been in vain. Ylour decision will be final and your verdict will be satisfactory. The central figure in this exhibit is designed to represent “Ceres,” the Goddess of Agriculture, holding a sickle in her hands, and to com- _ plete the group, on either side is a model of the highest type of dairy cows. The one on the right represents the Jersey breed, and is modeled from a famous cow of Dr. Still’s, at Kirksville, Missouri. This cow was entered in the World’s Fair stock show and won a prize. She was sold Monday, September i19th, for $2,350.00 to a resident of New York. This cow’s head and neck is resting on a sheaf of wheat and her nose is in the lap of “Ceres.” On the.top of her neck the left arm of the goddess is supported. As an evidence of the work done by the artist as shown in the perfect likeness of this cow, the children of the owner of the original when they saw this model, recognized it as their cow and called it by name. The cow on the left represents the Holstein breed, and is modeled from a very famous cow of M. E. Moore’s at Cameron. This cow was in the test at the World’s Fair and made 270 pounds of butter in niety days. The owner of the original of this model pronounced this a perfect likeness or reproduction. This entire exhibit is made of solid butter, absolutely pure, there being used over 3,000 pounds. This is one of the remarkable features of the exhibit, as the usual way is to make the statues out of something else, and cover them with butter. The butter out of which this exhibit is made is the product from 75,000 pounds of milk, or 9,000 gallons, which would be equal to an average milking from 6,000 cows. On the wails of this space an impressive story is told of the progress made in dairy methods and the manner of handling the raw material, in frieze work. The walls are covered several inches thick with butter, and the figures 216 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. used are made in bold relief. Commencing at the left on the end space is the figure of a woman churning with the old-fashioned churn. In the next corner is a woman skimming a pan of milk on which the cream has raised by the old gravity process. This represents the “old method.” Between the two, on the floor of a scantily furnished log house, is a boy feeding a dog. To the right of this, at right angles, is the mother play- ing with her children, while a boy is separating the milk with a centrif- ugal separator. This represents “the new method.” Around the corner from this is a reproduction of the seal of the State of Missouri. All of this is done in butter. This exhibit is in a refrigerator with a glass front of three thicknesses of plate glass and an air space between each two. At one end of the case is an ice-making machine in constant opera- tion, and the temperature inside of the case is kept below freezing. The space occupied by Missouri’s butter exhibit is eight feet by twenty-eight feet, making 224 square feet of floor space, and about 325 square feet of wall space. The work done on it was equal to three months work for one man, and its magnitude is commensurate with the possibilities of the great State represented by it. MISSOURI'S BIG CHEESE. In its design and construction, Missouri’s cheese exhibit is a wonder- ful thing, because of its being the first and only one of the kind. In its size it is typical of the extensive scale on which Missouri carries on all MISSOURI'S BIG CHEESE. Three thousand five hundred pounds of milk used in making, furnished by 150 dairymen. THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 217 lines of agriculture. This is a full cream cheese and weighs over 3,000 pounds. It required ten men to unload it and put it in the case, and it took four horses hitched to a heavy truck wagon to haul it from the freight car to the Agricultural building. As indicated on the card in- side of the case, it was made in Altamont, Daviess county, in which part of the State a large proportion of Missouri's cheese factories are located. On the face of the cheese is moulded a typical milk cow, represented as being in clover with a milkmaid by her side, sitting on a stool, engaged in milking. To make this cheese required 35,000 pounds of milk, a car load and a half, one milking from 3,000 ordinary cows. The milk out of which this cheese was made was purchased from 150 dairymen. It is seven feet in diameter and was put into the case where it is now on exhibition in the original hoop in which it was pressed. This case is made exactly the same as the butter case, and the temperature is held at about 35 to 40 degrees. For classified list of prizes on butter and cheese see list of awards on another page. MISSOURI LIVE STOCK. The different classes of live stock are only so many intricate ma- chines which convert at a profit to the farmers the raw materials of the FOUR PRIZE WINNING MULES. Topsy, Mollie, Babe and Bettie. Owned by W. A. Elgin, Platte City, Mo. 218 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. farm into a finished product. . No country has ever maintained for a great length of time a successful and profitable system of agriculture without making live stock farming the basis of that system. No state or country is endowed with greater natural advantages for producing a high quality of domestic animals than is Missouri, and in addition to what nature has done for this State, the men who are engaged in the breeding, fattening and training the animals produced are as well skilled in the science of animal husbandry as any other people in the world as a careful examina- tion of the records of the great competitive live stock expositions which have been held during the last twenty years will unquestionably prove. Climate, Feed and Water.—The climate of Missouri is temperate and is not marked by the extremes of heat and cold that are found in the more northern countries. The cold of the winter is not so severe as to make it necessary to provide expensive barns to protect the stock, neither is the heat in the hottest of the summer oppressive. The average annual mean temperature for the State is 54 degrees and the average annual mean temperature for January is only 30 degrees, while the average mean temperature for July is only 77.5. The average annual rainfall computed from the records of the Weather Bureau is 39.5 inches, only 6.49 inches of which falls during the three winter months. The average annual rainfall for the three spring months is 11.97, and for the summer months is 12.12 inches. The abundant rainfall, admirably distributed as to season, coupled with the mild equable climate (only two months in the year i. e. January 30 degrees and February 30 degrees, have an average temperature below the freezing point) gives Missouri natural advantages unsurpassed for growing a great variety of grains, grasses and leguminous plants, all of which are necessary in the economical pro- duction of a high quality of live stock. Another essential in growing live stock is an adequate supply of water of good quality. Missouri is checkered by the greatest river system in the world—the Mississippi— Missouri system—and every one of the one hundred and fourteen counties is drained by the tributaries of this system. Fine springs and deep wells of water containing just the right amount of mineral matter to supple- ment the great variety of grains and grasses, are found in all parts of the State, and no farmer need ever be in dread of a water famine to cause loss on his live stock. Missouri Live Stock in Competition—The above paragraphs point out some of the natural advantages possessed by the State for the pro- duction of a high class of stock. To prove that Missouri farmers have taken advantage of their favorable environment, it is only necessary to examine the records of some of the great competitive live stock shows held within the last few vears. XPOSITION. 1 CHASE LOUISIANA PUR THI A fil st pr ize winner Wor Id s FP air ’ 1904 UW hree ye a MULE “LILL.”’ vs old, 17 hands high, weight 1,560 pounds, Owner, J I > Ww ilson, Wellsville, Mo. 220 MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. At Chicago—At the World’s Columbian Exposition held in Chicago in 1893, Missouri breeders again met in competitive exhibition the most successful breeders of the world, and again they demonstrated their ability to produce animals of the highest quality. In saddle horses Missouri won twenty-three premiums including the sweepstakes premium on saddle stallion, any age. In jacks and mules Missouri won seven premiums. On Aberdeen Angus cattle, Missouri won 24 premiums including 5 sweepstakes. In Shorthorn cattle 18 awards, including two sweepstakes were given Missouri breeders. The Hereford breeders captured 17 sweepstakes premiums. Red Polled breeders were awarded 17 prizes including sweepstakes on herd. The Jersey breeders of the State cap- tured 27 prizes. In the swine department Missouri was awarded 106 prizes. On sheep Missouri received 74 awards, including I0 sweep- stakes premiums. At Omaha—At the Trans-Mississippi and International Exposition held at Omaha, Nebraska, in 1898, Missouri breeders received one hun- dred and forty-six premiums on hogs and cattle, a greater number than any other state. In the grand parade of cattle at the close of the Exposi- tion, the herds were arranged according to their merit, as shown by the awards of the judges, and “A Missouri herd was first, a Missouri herd was second, a Missouri herd was third, a Missouri herd was fourth and a Missouri herd was sixth;” not quite the whole show but pretty near it. Missouri Live Stock at Louisiana Purchase Exposition—The greatest collection of live stock ever assembled was seen at this, the greatest of all expositions. The exposition company appropriated the magnificent sum of $280,307 for live stock premiums, and this sum was supplemented by special and state premiums to the amount of $258,395, making a grand total of $538,702. Missouri won in all classes, competing against the world, the handsome sum of $27,255.00 from the Exposition, besides the money won from prizes offered by breeders’ associations and state prizes. The Missouri Commission very liberally set aside $100,000 for premiums and expenses for Missouri exhibitors, and of this amount the cattle raisers got $34,820; horsemen, $18,517; hog growers, $21,005, and sheep growers, $2,130. Missouri duplicated all cash prizes awarded to stock owned in the State, and in addition awarded prizes in competi- tion with Missouri animals only. Altogether Missouri breeders won 690 World’s Fair premiums on live stock, not counting the State prizes, a number not equalled by any other state or country. Missouri’s rank is readily seen by a study of the awards, a copy of which is appended to this article. Of the total awards Missouri not only received many first and second prizes but her breeders also won 27 grand prizes where com- THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION. 221 petition was limited to first prize winners, and also 13 grand champion prizes, where competition was limited to the animals winning grand prizes. Missouri wins twenty-seven Champion Prizes and thirteen Grand Champion Prizes. ‘CHAMPION PRIZES. (Competition limited to First Prize Winners.) FRENCH COACH HORSES. Stallion, three years and over...........+++-- Wie wel canbe dbble SeaqooqoabocGoodoc Kansas City PERCHERON HORSES. Stallion, three years and over....... Sonoeonoc | Wiese Neisariohiliinsrstervcr/steleies:elelsiels .-Kansas City | JACKS. Jack, three years and over.......... soagadas | Ion Me Monseesi7@ SONS jens ce-slesinrels Smithton Jack, two years and under.................. : L. M. Monsees & Sons.............. Smithton Jennet, three years and over................ Lelie MOTISCESii dc) SODS%\¢slciciererc cre cicrers Smithton Jennet, two years and under..............++- | L. M. Monsees & Sons......... .....-smithton Bull, two years and OVEL..........0e--eeeeeee . | Abele 1enaGh ng CA (OOcongdnocoticocsabds -.Clinton HEREFORD CATTLE. Bull under two years.............+.+.- wcceccce | Stewart & Hutcheon.................Blockow Heifer under two years............ Seletaraye adscer OPRGAENIS| piece see eicicivicisieisie eisloiciomaloieinieisiesieeLeL ELS Fat steer or heifer.............. piatatevarevatnieteistotele | ysielis DESO CKeiaictstercisiclelels meleielsisiciesine sslanieele nl aCOn GALLOWAY CATTLE. Cow, two years and over......... scoponcsacn: | CN EMCOdy a ccsein1> alnle/sielelelolelstele(eteie'satsiete MEL ORL GSE JERSEY CATTLE. Helfer, under two years.......... nocoBsvonoT 50 | CAE. Stilli.cisc. nOOGEOUCC poppe dodoods Kirksville HOLSTEIN FRIESIAN CATTLE. Bull, two years and Over?.........+..++- ceeees : | W. F. Holstein Association......... St. Louis Bull, under two yearS...........seeeeeccecoees IMiSy ERP NIO OTC aanteiecisiolalniece sisters eisielaiaer= ....Cameron Cow, two years and OVETL.......-..esseecvoere W. F. Holstein Association...... ...st. Louis POLAND CHINA HOGS. BOAT WONG y VAI AUG MONET erseitntcis saicislere (ccs c.e)cini Worn Ss MESS bine onto aise staiste oie ere Martin City BOAT Sane SEONG ey Ca lemmtiactsisnistani «ates flat Mirabile GRAND CHAMPION PRIZES. (Competition limited to Champion Winners.) FRENCH COACH HORSES. Stallion, any age.............. aulonteecemese aces | Wi Mclwushlinkcerteaccnctscecisie cine Kansas City PERCHERON HORSES. Slim. pale ove shoeseoovcocc oder anpadedadouueL | NV Miclvane bliin: so eccense sccm nln Kansas City JACKS AND JENNETS. EMIE tI, Ak Oe eset Mictate ecinta belo = eelnieseisic(elecoisistersie | I. M. Monsees & Sons.............. Smithton SHORTHORN CATTLE. BUM ey AEC ate otereinie s erctelolerlataletelelaininiscisiniecielsielatste | Mebor Wand GG: (COs scence sees ast a Clinton HEREFORD CATTLE. Fat steer or spayed heifer, all breeds and | IS CRM eeteyeran elsrelaie/old a siainis olsisloieinie/s\ciotatelewnieisip peisiniele | Serle (RLOCKascsn cosines ennel-ineie salem ents Macon GALLOWAY CATTLE. COW PAU ALOs enemas cteaisier sien bncowe sr vaeieistniwie.sisicte | se INE LOO Vin sie steieinvs ciotereeie