4 4) it rd ry f) ie th cus 5 on zy > oy) ss r, AU Trae ,' + “ea aye ‘ ONO rth! co gm aeee ae Da TF Sty SG. Rie ry 2. 4" : yy Ser pares Jado tetaisgtore: name, oat! re H aa mM ea) as Z =) ea ap in “OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN The person charging this material is responsible for its renewal or return to the library on or before the due date. The minimum fee for a lost item is $125.00, $300.00 for bound journals. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. Please note: self-stick notes may result in torn pages and lift some inks. Renew via the Telephone Center at 217-333-8400, 846-262-1510 (toll-free) or circlib @uiuc.edu. Renew online by choosing the My Account option at: http://www.library.uiuc.edu/catalog/ fywry NINA su 5 t =f - * a. ~*~ ~ oD whi * BL —SSI@NITH. ‘6! RL grure kepsmmyy, puv Aepsoupaay ‘Aepsony, wo pray aq ITM UOIWBIOOssY S,ueuIAITeG 39%99 STOUTITT Jo VOTUIATOD 99N15 IX9U ALOT AY VNNVZYUN ‘SIONITTI 20 LLISWMAAINN ‘“AYUNLINOIIYOV 40 ADAT1I09D BRN nN of the Illinois State Dairymen’s Association oY Ja Convention held at Freeport, Illinois, aJanuary 7th, 8thand 9th, 1902 COMPILED BY GEO. CAVEN, SECRETARY Stenographic Report by Miss E. Emma Newman Twenty-Lighth Annual Report NEWS-ADVOCATE PRINT, ELGIN, ILLINOIS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — http://archive.org/details/annualreportofi228illi LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Office of Secretary Illinois State Dairymen’s Association. Chicago, II11., 1902 To His Excellency Richard Yates, Governor of the State of Illinois: I have the honor to submit the official report of the Illinois State Dairymen’s Association, containing the addresses, papers, and discus- sions at its twenty-eight annual meeting, held at Freeport, Illinois, Jan. 7, 8, and 9, 1902. Respectfully, GEO. CAVEN, Secretary. 219004 LIST OF OFFICERS, 1902. Tresident— JOSEPH NEWMAN, Elgin. Vice President— J. R. BIDDULPH, Providence. Directors— GEO. H. GURLER, DeKalb. JOSEPH NEWMAN, Elgin. F, A. CARR, Aurora. JOHN STEWART, Elburn. IRVIN NOWLAN, Toulon. R. R. MURPHY, Garden Plain. J. R. BIDDULPH, Providence. l'reasurer— H. H. HOPKINS, Hinckley. Secretary— GEO. CAVEN, Chicago. By-Laws of the Illinois State Dairymen’s Association. OFFICERS. Section 1.—The officers of this Association shall consist of a Presi- dent, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Board of Directors, com- posed of seven members, of whom the President and Vice President of the Association shall be members and the President ex-officio Chairman. DUTIES OF THE PRESIDENT. Sec. 2.—The President shall preside at the meetings of the Association and of the Board of Directors. It shall be his duty, together with the Secretary of the Board of Directors, to arrange a program and order of business for each regular annual meeting of the Association and of the Board of Directors, and upon the written request of five members of the Association it shall be his duty to call such special meetings. It shall be his further duty to call on the Stat2 Auditor of Public Accounts for his watrant on the State Treasurer, for the annual sum appropriated by the Legislature for the use of this Association, present the warrant to the Treasurer for payment and on receiving the money receipt for the same, which he shall pay over tothe Treasurer of the Association, taking his receipt therefor. DUTIES OF THE VICE PRESIDENT. Sec. 3.—In the absence of the President his duties shall devolve upon she Vice President. 6 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. DUTIES OF THE SECRETARY. Sec. 4.—The secretary shall record the proceedings of the Association and of the Board of Directors. Heshall keepa list of the members, collect all the moneys due the Association (other than the legislative appropria- tions), and shall record the amount with the name and postoffice address of the person so ‘paying, in a book to be kept for that purpose. He shall pay over all such moneys to the Treasurer, taking his receipttherefor. It shall also be his duty to assist in making the program for the annual meeting and at the close of the said meeting compile and prepare for publication all papers, essays, discussions, and other matter worthy of publication, at the earliest day possible, and shall perform such other duties pertaining to his office as shall be necessary. DUTIES OF THE TREASURER. Sec. 5.—The Treasurer shall, before entering on the duties of his. office, give a good and sufficient bond to the Directors of the Associa- tion, with one or more sureties, to be approved by the Board of Directors, which bond shall be conditioned for a faithful performance of the duties. of his office. He shall account to the Association for all moneys re- ceived by him by virtue of said office and pay over the same as he shail be directed by the Board of Directors. No moneys shall be paid out by the Treasurer except upon an ores from the Board, signed by the Presi- dent and countersigned by the Secretary. The books of account of the Treasurer shall at all times be open to the inspection of the members of the Board of Directors, and heshall, at the expiration of his term of office make a report to the Association of the conditions of its finances, and. deliver to his successor the books of account together with all moneys and other property of the Association in his possession or custody. DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Sec. 6.—The Board of Directors shall have the general management and control of the property and affairs of the Association, subject to the By-Laws. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 7 Four members of the Board shall constitute a quorum to do busi- ness. The Board of Directors may adopt such rules and regulations as they shall deem advisable for their government, and may appoint such com- mittees as they shall consider desirable. ) | They shall also make a biennial report to the Governor of the State of the expenditures of the money «ppropriated to the Association by the Legislature. It shall be their further duty to decide the location, fix the date, and procure the place for holding the annual meetirg of the Association, and arrange the program and order of business for the same. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. Sec. 7.—The President, Vice Fresident, and Board of Directors shall be elected annually by ballot at ike first annual meeting of the Associa- tion. The Treasurer and Secretary shall be elected by the Board of Direc- tors. . The officers of the Association shall retain their offices until their successors are chosen and qualify. A plurality vote shall elect. Vacancies occuring shall be filled by the Board of Directors until the following annual election. MEMBERSHIP. Sec. 8.—Any person may become a member of this Association by paying the Treasurer such membership fee as shall from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors. QUORI'M. Sec. 9—Seven members of the Association shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but a less number may adjourn. 4 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT. Sec. 10.—One month prior to the annual meeting in each year the Board of Directors shall fix the amount, if any which may be necessary to. be paid by each member of the Asscciation as an annual due. Notice of such action must be sent to each member within ten days thereafter, and no member in default in payment thereof shall be entitled to the privileges of the Association. AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS. Sec. 11—These By-Laws may be amended at any annual meeting by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the members present. Notice of the proposed amendment must be given in writing, and at a public meeting of the Association, at least one day before any action can be taken there- on. A424 PROCEEDINGS aa OF THE Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting OF THE Illinois State Dairymen’s Association Held at Freeport, Illinois, January 7, 8 and 9, 1902 The Illinois State Dairymen’s Association met in annual session in Germania hall at Freeport, January 7th, 1902, at 1:30 o’clock p. m. President Joseph Newman ia the chair. PRAYER REV. MR. C E. DUNN. Let us pray. . O God, our gracious, heavenly Father, we invoke Thy blessing on this assembly. Thou art the seat of all that is good, and we ask our Creator to drawinear to us and bless us. Be with them through their several ses- sions, and bless their efforts, both of those who speak and those who Gsten. 10 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. There is no interest of men but that Thy interest is with them. We pray that all the plannings of these Thy servants may be right in Thy sight and that Thou wilt publicly bless them. We rejoice in this great land of ours which Thou hast given us. We pray that these Thy servants who till the soil and are interested in the extension of agriculture, may be guided by Thee. May the blessings of the Most high rest upon them and strengthen them in the conduct of these meetings. Like the cattle upon the thousand hills, guide us we beseech Thee, and comfort us with Thy blessing and bring us to Thy heavenly kingdom. Weask it in Christ’s name. Amen. By the President: The Elgin Butter Tub Company has seen fit to furnish us with a beautiful gavel. We never have had one before and I am sure it will be appreciated, and return thanks to the Elgin Butter Tub Company for it. ADDRESS OF WELCOME MAYOR HUENKEMEIER, FREEPORT, ILL. Mr. Chairman and Ladiesand Gentiemen of this Convention: It affords me great pleasure to see you here in our city for the pur- pose of holding your annual convention. Many of you have left your offices, your farms and creameries to take part in this convention. Many of vou have come to seek knowledge as to the best practical way of running your creameries and farms, and how to get the best results for ate high grade butter, which will be. demonstrated within the next few days. Men will address you that have had years of practical experience in the dairy business, and good; will come of these meetings. We hope you will never regret your visit to our city. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. II You have shown great wisdom in selecting Freeport to hold your annual convention. Freeport can accommodate you much better than any other city of its size in this great State of Illinois, and I assure you no other city would accord youa more hearty welcome. You have done us great honor and we appreciate it. Freeport is delighted to see you here today. The city is yours and the heart and hand of every citizen is open to you and we welcome you with joy. RESPONSE GEORGE CAVEN, CHICAGO. By the President: Wehad upen our program, to answer Mr, Huen- kemeier, our old president, Mr. George H. Gurler. But Isawhimin Elgin yesterday and he said that he was efraid he could not be present on ac- count of business. His son was gcing to Iowa and he would be left at home alone. Mr. Caven, your worthy secretary, will speak for him. Mr. Chairman: Although I am not capable of responding for Mr. Gurler, sofamousa dairyman as he is, I can express ihe thanks of the Association for the kind words of welcome the Mayor has given us today. Most of us have attended convertions, both in illinois and other states, so that we know just how far we can go, and for that reason, 1 assure the Mayor we will not violate the ordinances and not get into serious difficulty. But seriously speaking, when we selected Freeport for our conven- tion, we knew that we weracoming into one of the famous dairy sec- tions of the country; tooneofthe famous dairy districts of the world, and on account of this location we expect to have a successful con- vention. 12 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. I can assure you all, that what the Mayor said about the open- hearted kindness of the people of Freeport, has been demonstrated to me during the time that I have been here at work preparing for this con- vention. I never went to a place where every one seemed to be so anxious to grant favors, and for that reason, as well as for the favorable location, I think we are going to have a good convention. We certainly have as fine, if nut finer, display of dairy machinery in Armory Hall that we have ever had at any state convention, and if the sessions are as good comparatively as the machinery exhibit, we will break all our records in state dairy conventions. I thank you and I thank the Mayor. By the President: It now becomes my duty to appoint committees. For ~~ the Committee on Resolutions I will appoint: Mr. M. Long of Woodstock. Mr. Irving Nowlan of Toulon. Mr. George Caven of Chicago. For Committee on Memberships, I will appoint: Mr. J. P. Younger of Freeport. Mr. Grant Mallory of Freeport. Mr. F. W. Woodring of Chicago. The Committee on Nominations I will hold until more will be here on the next train or two, and will notify you tomorrow. It is understood of course that all resolutions, before they can be read in the house, must go to the committee. Any one having resolutions wishing to be acted on, will hand them to the Secretary, so they can go to:the committee, and be acted upon from that committee. By the Vice President: The next thing on the program is the ad- dress from our worthy president. I wish} to introduce Mr. Joseph Newman. Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Genlemen:— When this association came into. life, 28 years ago, at Woodstock, Elgin furnished its first president in Dr. Jos. Tefit. The growth during ILLINOIS STATE DAJRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 13 the intervening years has been'a natural one; the interest in it developed more in the northwestern countiees, and seeming to remain there—Free- port, being almost the center of ihe Elgin district. The officials, the past ten years, have tried to encourage dairying in the center and southern part of ihe state, but have met with little suc- cess. The great drawback seems to be, the trouble of obtaining the nec- essary help to milk the cows, and w«. invite mechanical scientists to turn their attention to a milking macuine which will meet the requirements of an up-to-date dairyman, as we have over a million cows in this state alone, and all need milking, as Col. Sellers said of his Eyewater, ‘“There’s millions in it,’ for the ingenious American who perfects one, this one thing will do more to getand hold ihe world’s markets than anything else. We appreciate the fact that dai:ymen generally are holding back from increasing the number of milchb cows on account of the high price of other farm products. This is asericus menace to dairying, but we re- gard it as only a temporary’one, and before we could safely change our herds and manner of conducting a cairy farm, this inequality will pass away; hence the old adage of “Shoemaker, stick to your last” holds good, and it will be wisest to hold on to the best cows and stay at the business. The man who iseternally changing his business because he thinks the other is making a better living than he is, is generally the one to get left, by changing at the wrong time. Of course we all admit that the main reason why dairy products are so very low when compared with other comodities raised on the farm, is the fact that the market value cf milk is guaged by the price of cream- ery butter, andthis is held down by the masquerading of “Butterine and 3? Oleo” as “Elgin Creamery” and “Wisconsin Dairy,’ colored to deceive the best judges, and which should sell at about 9c a pound, but on account of its deceptive color is able, in large cities, to fetch nearly 20c. Our state law seems to be a dead letter, and our National Dairy Union is now working at Washirgton to secure national legislation, 14 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. putting butterine and oleomargine, colored to resemble butter, under a tax of 10c per pound, and when not colored as such, then put it on the free list, or taking off the present tax of 2c per pound, because we believe if the working people want to eat butterine, they should not be taxed, and without any tax they should' buy the best for 10c to 12c per pound, with hogs at 6c this would give a living profit to all who handle it, and no one be decetvett as they noware. This assocition should urge, and we do urge, all membsrs and its friends to assist the National Dairy Union in their estimable work allthat lays in their power. In this connection, one of the things would be to make this association stronger by joining it; each county in the state should be well represented in this dairy asso- ciation, and thus be a power for good along dairy lines. This can only be accomplished by organized effort. All breeders of dairy cattle should be with us and act with us,and then we in turn should act with the differ- ent associaions relating to farm stock and products of the farm, giving and receiving knowledge by the exchange of ideas that will be a great benefit and help to all. Weall have problems that must be faced and worked out, and these will be found easy to accomplish by pulling togeth- er. The cattle and hog men may think they are gainers in this oleo fight at the expense of the dairymen, but we can assure them, that when one branch of the producers suffer, all will suffer by it. So let’s start in this century by joining this organization and getting our friends to do like- wise. The markets for dairy products the past year were good as usual, to a large extent, the home market was the best, with Elgin in the lead, The prosperous condition of the country being such that all who wanted work, and were able to doit, could get it. The foreign markets are be- fore us, and our government, thrcugh the agricultural department, guided by that worthy son of our sister state, Iowa, Secretary Wilson, is making it plain and easyrfor all to reach them, and the transportation companies are providing refrigeration to all parts of the world as fast as business warrants. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 15 We find plenty of competion and with modern .Russia opening up her vast empire, it will need all the American ingenuity and brains to be able to produce cheap enough and live, when the season comes that we will need to export our surplus. The home market is in splendid shape. We would urge our manufacturers io keep up the high quality of their products, especially cheese. More cheese could be sold in America today than is made, providing you will give the people a full cream, close made, meaty cheese, rich in flavor. Wisconsin and New York are making some ofthis kind. If we could alldoit, the demand would exceed the supply. Since we last met together, the i.ation has been plunged into deep sor- row through a mistaken, misguided, unbalanced wretch, who took the life of our beloved president, Wm. Mchinley, whose personality and life was an inspiration to those around and about him, in fact the nation. Al- ways full of hope and faith that the right would prevail, and by working with that faith he secured for us the first place among the nations. His sucessor will be a worthy one, full of strength and courage to carry out the wishes of the American peopie. I would call your attention to the Machinery hall, where may be seen the newest and latest devices for the farm, dairy, creamery and cheese factory, and gentlemanly attendanis who will be pleased to explain their working. As president of your association, I have had the pleasure of meeting with the directors of the State Farmers Institute the past year, and Ican assure you I was warmly welcomed, and found the work performed by the Institute certainly to be worth many times its cost to the state in an educational way. The state furnishes us the usual appropriation, and we have had printed and distributed throughout the entire state 3000 copies of our an- nual report, which, if carefully read and digested, would be worth its weight in gold, and we believe it is money wellspent. Besides, the com- munities in which the meetings are held receive ideas and information that cannot be computed in value. We hope Freeport, surrounded as 16 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. she is by a magnificent country and rich farmers, may also be profited —as they will be if they will only turn out and fill this hall at every ses- sion. You can’t afford to miss one, for we have on the program’eminent men in their several lines, and after hearing them and the discussions that follow, we hope you willstart right away and weed out the poor unprofitable cows, and begin to think what protien crop you can put in next spring to balance up the corn. You must join in the discussions, ask questions on any or all subjects and feel free to offer ideas and sug- gestions, and thus make this convertion an ideal one and profitable to you. Buffalo gave us a test of the different dairy breeds, and while the other dairy show: was not large, the next one at St. Louis, in 1903, can be, if the dairymen will interest themselves in it as other ciasses of pro- ducers do. The best thing that could happen to the dairyman is, that the president of the fair appointMr. Sudendorf superintendent of the dairy department. He would wake up the dairymen of these United States as they never have been before, and the world would know it too. Your directors have heldijseveral meetings the past year endeavoring to watch your interests. They bave thought that a few smaller meet- ings might be beneficial as aids to this general convention, and instruct- ed me totry one at Elgin. The time set was December 14th, and as fate would have it, it was our first cold day, and the thermometer by noon was below zero, and at meeting time 16 below. Hence the attendance was very slim, but Prof. Fraser entertained us for an hour showing us views and telling us of his trip through England, Denmark and Holland. The idea was to inculcate Cleanliness in the dairy, which we ail need to improve. I will close by calling’ your attention to your agricultural college’ at Champaign. Do you farmers realize what you have there? There should be at least 25 young men and women there from this county. The cost is very little and the advantages to be gained are beyond com- putation. We realize that your farming community here is rich, but ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 17 that does not always furnish brains to the next generation. Hence give the boys and girls a chance for themselves, and what better foundation than a good practical education,so they can know the soil, not guess at it; pick out the best heifer, steer or pig in the bunch; then know how when and what to feed them to proiuce the most for the least expense. Intelligence is needed as much today on the farm, as it is to combine rail- roads. Write Prof. Davenport for further information or see any of the professors here with us. I hope the work put upon this year’s program by your officers, and especially your must able and faithful secretary, Mr. Caven, will be like the bread of old, cast upon the waters that will return to bless and prosper you and yours for all future time. CARE, FEED AND FEEDING OF DAIRY COWS. SUPERINTENDENT OF FEEDS, MODEL DAIRY, PAN-AMERICAN EXPOSITION, MR. J. FRED SCHLAPPI, CONSTABLE- VILLE, NEW YORK. Mr. President, Ladies and Brother Dairymen: Among the wonders of the Pan-American, but few attracted more at- tention than did the’ dairy test at the Model Dairy. From one end of our nation to the other, many watched for the re- ports from week to week. This was not confined to our own country. The Central and South Americans watched and inquired into this dairy test. The farmers of those nations are anxious to improve their dairy stock, and this was really the first cpportunity they had to see a thorough test of the different breeds. Up to this time, every breeder declared that his particular breed was the breed above all others, which made it nearly impossible to decide 18 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. which was the best breed. But the Pan-American test practically set- tled this. Placed in the hands of men who are raised above all petty jealous- ies, it was carried on sucessfully and the result has been surprising to most of us. © Nearly a year ago, Mr. Converse, the supperintendent of the agricul- tural and dairy products at the Pan-American conceived the idea of having a model dairy. He invited the different breeders to meet him at Buffalo, if possible, which was done some time in February a year ago. At that time there were ten representatives of as many different breeds present, and they all agreed to bring five cows of their respective breeds. In the meantime, after this meeting was over and the members had returned to their homes and began to think about the test more than they had done before, the American Jersey Cattle Club, also the Ameri- can Holstein Cattle Club decided they would not enter the test under the rules laid down at the meeting. The Canadian government had a rep- resentative at Buffalo nearly all iast winter. He came in contact with Mr. Convers and told him thatif the American Jersey people, and the American Holstein people were not willing to enter the test under the rules, they would bring five cowsof eny breed that would refuse to go into this model dairy. There you will see the wisdom of those Cana- dians in making this proposition. They are reaping a good harvest from it now, selling breeding stock to people who came there to investigate. On the 26th of April, just before this dairy was opened, and the Cana- dians then had five breeds of theirs represented there, a meeting was held, and it was brought to such a pass that the Canadians really had the power to decide what should be done and what should not bedone; and they decided it should be a dairy breed test pure and simple. None of the American breeders—some of them not being present personally—had any objections to that, except the Guernseys. They all agreed to goiin ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 19 and get all they could out of it. but Mr. Caldwell, the secretary of the Guernsey cattle breed, he objected. He protested and said he would not enter that test under any circum- stances. He was determined not to go inatall, but was finally persuaded to go in, and did go in under protest. And the funny side of that was, as you all know, the Guernseys finally came out on top of the heap. Mr. Caldwell’s objection was that the cows he had selected to be repre- sented there at the Pan-American .were not cows fitted to go into sucha test; that he had much better individual cows that he could not get at that time. So he entered the test under protest; said he did not know it was to be a test ,or he would not Lave brought the cattle at all. We were asked probably a thousand times which were the best breed of cattle. No answer could be givcn to that question definitely. Every one claimed he had the best breed of cattle. They all have their good points, but none have all the desirable qualifications, and then, too, it depends what the intentions are. To show you why I take this grourd, I have a list here of all-the cows in the Model Dairy. I have listed them according to the amount of profit they had made on estimated butter. I wiil not give youthe profit of them all, the list being too long, but wil! take the first ten cows. The first one is Mary Marshall, a Guernsey, that made a net profit on estimated butter of $59.40. The second was a great surprise to us all, and it may be a surprise to you. It'wasared Polled cow, Mayflower, with a net profit on estimated butter of $52.10. The third one is Cassiopiea, a Guernsey, which made a net profit on estimated butter of $50.35. The fourth, Primrose, a Jersey, with a net profit on estimated butter of $50.25. The fifth, Procius of Pastang, a Guernsey, with a net profit on esti- mated butter of $49.49. 20 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. The sixth, Beauty of Norval, a Holstein, with a net profit on estli- mated butter of $49.43. The seventh, Queen May,a Jersey, with a net profit on estimated but ter of $47.46. a ‘ The eighth, Betsey I., an Ayshire, with a net profit on estimated but- ter of $46.07. The ninth, Pearl of Woodside, ar Ayshire; profit $45.46. And tenth, Kersty Wallace, a Jersey, with a profit of $45.34. So here they are. In’the first ten we find three Guernseys, three Ayrshires, two Jerseys, one Red Polled, and one Holstein. Here are five breeds in those first ten cows of tne fifty that were there. I think that shows pretty clearly the ground I take in saying it was hard to answer the question, “Which were the best breed of cattle at the Pan-American in the Model Dairy?’ Wecannot say that there is any one breed that has all the good points. Now as to care. I would like tc ask how many horsemen here in Free- port, or in the State of Illinois, would think of going out to do aday’s work with their horses, or driving for pleasure, or using their horses for any purpose they may see fit, would think ef going out without giving their horses a thorough grooming. Not cne I think. But how many of us dairymen do give our cows one bit of care. We simply take the feed and throw it before them; let them eat what they like, and throw the rest out; and perhaps don’t give them enough to sustain the body, say nothing of giving milk; don’t know whether they are feeding a _ bal- anced ration or any other ration, just so they eat. Itis not all in feeding, not by any means. Feed alone won’t make a cow do her best. You can’t get the best out of a cow by feedalone. You take some care of her and you will get much better results. Don’t just throw some kind of food to her. See that she is fed, and fed the right kind of food, and keep her clean. It is said a good many times things are not appreciated because they are cheap, and I think that is true, and it reminds me of a man in our ILLINOIS STATE LAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 21 town. There was acarpenterinour town, a good workman, but always poor. He could never gotothestores without having to have things charged. One time, as' he was going out ofthe store, the proprietor called to him and said: ‘“‘Anthony, I want to see you.” Anthony stepped back and was heard to say: ‘‘Well, Mr. Miller, I haven’t any money, butif you have got work Iam chuck fullhofthat.”’ It is the same with us; care don’t cost anything. A little elbow grease and a little time will work wonders. If we have put ten pounds of feed in a cow to get certain results, it has been my experience that if you feed that cow seven pounds of feed and give her three minutes extra care ycu will get just as good resultsiand much more satisfaction. The feeds at the Model Dairy were not provided for as well as they could have been. That is, it had not been looked out for properly. Mr. Converse got a gentleman to put vp some silage for them the year pre- vious. This Bilace was put up'seventeen miles away from the grounds. We could not get any oneany nearer. They could have done it on the exposition grounds if they had looked into it sooner, and saved a whole lot of money. We had silage like most of you farmers have. We had clover hay, although I found it dificult to find the kind I would liked to have had. I made severaltrips to the hay market and found it fairly good. Clover hay and silage constituted the roughage until we got green ‘food—green clover, oats, millet and fresh green corn. The supplementary feeds, the ,rotein feeds. Let us see how we can raise our protein feed next year. That is the hardest problem, to raise protein feed, butiit can be raised. We can get it in clover hay. Clover hay is a perfectly balanced ration, but it takes so much to make a cow ‘do her best; she cannot digest itall. We must give concentrated feeds. The carbohydrates, on the other hand we can raise to profection. I noticed the corn fields as I came throughthis grain valley. In traveling through the west one takes a sleeper at night and goes to ted, and lookes out in the morning on corn fields, and then still more corn fields. There is no 22 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. trouble through here, or in theeast, to raise all the carbohydrates we want, but it is the protein that is expensive. The feeding at the Model Dairy’ was entirely optional with the herds- men. They had areputation atstaks, and it was made entirely optional with them to feed what they liked. Any feed they asked for was given them, and it was weighed out to them right to the ounce. Not only was the concentrated foods weighed outo to them, but the silage as well; weighed out as close as your grocer weighs out your sugar. These feeds were all charged to the cows, and it behoved them to get the best results; putthemonthvrir mettle. They were trying to get the most for the least outlay of money, and how well they succeeded, lam going to tell you. Some of you have probably read the dairy papers and therefore know. It would be useless for me to go into detail on the ration each cow received during the six months they were there. There was hardly any two cows that got the same ration during that time. We were not feed- ing those cows as a herd, which we generally do on the farm. Those cows—and those on the farm as well— should be treated individually.. You know there are hardly any two cows that have the same capacity. If you want to get the very best results you should treat each cow individ- ually. A good deal is said about balanced rations. I think it an imposition on you to explain whata balanceration is. You all know it. However, if there is any one; here who does not know what a balanced ration means, I will say to them that it means feeds that contain one part protein to: five and one-half parts of carbohycrates. This should be fed to éaweiok to any animal; I mean/for milk. One part protein to five or five and one-half of carbohydrates would constitute a balance ration. That is a standard ration. Less than one, five, five is considered a narrow ration., Anything above that is a wide ration, which means more carbohydrates in proportion to the protein. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 22 There were the Guernsey herds, the Jersey herds, the Holstein herds and the Ayrshires. I have divided the feeding into three periods and given you the average. In order to cut down the figures, I will give you the average of each breed, not what each individual cow has done. So we will take the Guernseys first. They got 2534 pounds dry matter, 1-5-4 nut. ratio. Grain ration eleven pounds per day. It cost 17.3 cents per day to feed each one of the cows during the first period. The second period they got 18% pounds dry matter. The Nutra ratio was 1-5-8, a little wider than the first period. Thegrain feed was 12.3 pounds periday, and a cost of 14.6 cents per day. Thelast period they had 23 pounds dry mat- ter. Nutra ratio was 1-5. They were fed narrow. When Prof. Caldwell left the grounds, I think it was the first week, he said to Mr. Murphy, the herdsman, “I want you to feed those cows so they give as much milk with as little cost as you can possibly make it.’”’ And those cows did remark- ably well on a narrow ration. Some of the other herdsmen tried to follow his example, and the result was that the Guernseys took the lead at the start, and the other herdsmen thought Murphy had a cinch on anar- row ration, but they fell down when they tried it, some of them. The Jerseys were fed a little over 26 pounds dry matter and same nutra ratio, 1-5-3. Narrow, as yousee. The grain ration was considerable more than the Guernseys. It cost to feed them 17.4 cents a day. They used 14 pounds of grain. Thesecond period they fed 21 pounds dry mat- teraday. The nutra ration was1-4, which is very narrow. The Jersey herdsmen said if the Guernseys couic get better results by feeding a nar- row ration, they were going to make it narrow too, and he did, and con- sequently could not keep up his cows. They did not keep up in the test nor in milk. So they changed again and the next week their cows would be up again. He seemed to have no hold on them. Two-thirds of the time the first four months those cows were up and down and every way; did not seem to know what to do withthem. The last period was when the Jerseys did their best. We coula depend on them to do right from week to week. He was feeding these cows a wide ration. He got an idea 24 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. in his head that if he would feed a wide ration—that is more carbohy- drates in proportion to the proteiu—that he would get better results, and he did. There is a point for you dairymen where you raise more carbohy- drates. The nutra ration atthelast period was 1-6-3, which was wide. It cost 15.8 cents per day. The Ayrshires fed about 25 pounds dry matter the first period and they had identically a standard ration, 1-5-5; grain feed 12.8 pounds per day, and it cost them 16.4 cents per Gay. The second period of the Ayshires they fed 18 pounds dry matter. The nutra ratio 1-4-6, which was narrow. They were trying to follow the exampie of the Guernsey man with a narrow ration. But some of them found it did not work. I would say right here that the Ayshire herd was not handied as’intelligently as some others. The Guernsey cows were feda narrow ration; some of them narrower than others. I give this as an average, but not of the individual cow. As I said, the second period of the Ayrshires they fed 18 pounds dry matter, ratio of 1-4-6, atacostof13.8 cents per day. He was feeding a good deal of green food, and it was charged to them at $1.75 a ton, whereas the silage was charged at $2.00a ton. His cows did remarkably well. The last period they fed 24%, rounds dry matter and 11 pounds grain uw day, at a cost of 14 cents a day. The Ayrshires cost the most; higher than the Holsteins. The Holsteins in the first feeding period had 29 pounds dry matter. Nutra ratio 1-5-1, with 14 pounds grain feed a day at a cost of 18 cents a day. The second period they had 24344 pounds dry matter. The nutra ratio 1-4-2, which was very narrow as you see. Thirteen pounds of grain feed and it cost 18 cents per day. In the last period they used 29 pounds dry matter. The nutra ratio was 1-5-9, somewhat wider than the last. They fed 13.1 pounds of grain a day, but the cost, instead of goiug down, went to 19 cents @ day. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 25 There is a good lesson in those figures and especially as it was ina year when protein was so high. , At the meetings that were held in February, it was decided what should be charged for the feeds. We could not have one amount of feed at the market price and another at another price. It was necessary, in order not to get too large or too sinal! a price to have a permenent price for the feeds. They decided to takc the average of the five years past, and the feed was charged tothemallat the average of the last five years. Bran, $15.00; oats, $16.00; corn meal, $16.00; linseed meal, $25.00; cotton seed meal, $25.00; pea meal, $25.05. I think those are the prices without having the figures just at hand. Now the lesson to be gained from these computations is this: If we can not raise the protein feeds, have to buy a large portion of them when they are so excessively high as this year, and the price of products not correspondingly high, would it not be a good plan to feed a wider ration, although we can’t get quite as much milk? I would be understood, that Wwe can get more milk by feeding a narrow ration thania wideone. We can do that. Is it not more profitable to feed a wider, ration with such feeds aS we can raise on the farm, end get less milk at a less cost? I think that is what we are aiter—rais2 more and buy less. You probably noticed that durJng the second period that they used less dry matter. The total of Gry matter on the second period was less than the first or the third. Weted a good deal of green clover, grcen oats and green millet. The firstload of green clover that we had brought in, why, the herdsmen were sotickled. They were going to have green clover right along, and caiculated they would drop the grain f Or OP Late fall and early winter. Mr. Long:—What do you use to cut tkat stuff with? A. A mower. I cut it when the stalk is green. If you leave it un- til ripe it would be pretty hard work to cut. Another thing, the seed should be sown a peck to the acre. that is what Isow. Thereisacow pea for the north that is good to grow. 42 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Q. ‘What’s the name, please? A. The New Era. Q. I havetried the black eye. A. It is not as early as the new pea, and it- makesia good deal more Q. Did you ever have a failure with Soy beans? A. Not a failure in five years that I have been growingit. This has been the hardest season and then it was a better crop than corn. The corn was not nearly as good as this. Q. Give us the particulars and how many bushels per acre. A. Icould not say from the way I cut it this year. I don’t believe there were over 15 bushelstothe acre. But you take an acre, if you get rows like this (showing ear), you would get nearer 40 bushels or more. What kind of'soil? . ahestronger the soilthe the better. Does that require any mo wing? No; cut it with a machine. No hoeing? = oP OP. © ‘No; a two-horse cultivator, the same as I use for corn. Masses it up so as to cultivate it. Q. For hay or for seed? : A. I don’t take any chances on these plants; to cultivate this is a benefit to the soil. Q. When is the proper time to plant it? A. First of May to last of June cow peas; last of May to first of Au- Q. That’s down in Egypt? A. Yes, sir; but‘you can take dwarf and plant it in corn time, May to June. Plant dwarf at about first of June and it will mature in 60 days, and this green variety will mature in two or three days later, probably a week later. I think it will be a good ideato experiment with it. If you can get it to grow here in northern Illinois, you can beat your corn crop. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 43 The President:—I would say in connection with this talk, that this gentleman went from this section; that it would be a good idea to try an acre next year and you will see that it is something you can use in connec- tion with your corn and thussave your money and be able to produce milk cheaper. Q@. Do you feed itin the hay or grain?. A. Feed it mostly in the hay just as it is, but 1am feeding it mostly ' to sheep. The President:—In regard to this paper. It will bein our annual re- port, and it would be a good thing for you al! to belong to this Dairy Asso- ciation, and a copy of this book:wiil be sent you through the mail. This season’s report will be published in August. Mr. Crozier:—I would like ¢o ask what he considered a good crop for hay; how many tons tothe acre? A. Iccould not answerthat; never had it weighed. I have a good deal of mine in the pasture and orchard and paid very little atten- tion to the amount it turned off, put I think it depends; probably three tons of dry hay peracre. The medium would make from two to three tons I should think. @. How does it compare with clover hay? A. Itisaricher hay thanclover and there is not the objectionable dust that clover hay often has. The hard main stem the cattle don’t eat very well, if fed in largaquantities. But my experience has been in feed- ing sheep. I feed them the Mammoth Soy beanand hay and let the sheep have all they wanted and thenturn it over io the horses along with tim- othy hay. They would leave th: timothy hay and eatthis. They would not;,eat any great quantity of it, but a little at a time in preference to good timcthy hay. The President:—Let me call your attention to the excellent program. . tonight. Adjourned until 7:30 p. m. 44 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Tuesday Evening, Jan. 7tn, 1902. Convention called to order by the President. Music by the Wangdoodle Quartette. Emcored. Music by Gibler’s Orchestra. ‘By the President:—We have with us tonight one of our old friends, who has come all the way from Omaha to help entertain us; one whom no siate or national convention would be all right without. Allow me to introduce Hon. Jules Lumbard, of Omaha. SSong:—I shall have to ask your. pardon for singing sacred music. By the President:—I would like to say, Mr. Lumbard, all the dairy- men are religious. Mr. Lumbard:—I know they are all very devout. Encored. HOW TO EDUCATE OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS TO REMAIN ON THE FARM. BY. W. R. KIMZEY, TAMAROA, ILL., PRESIDENT ILLINOIS FARMERS’ INSTITUTE. Mr. President: —This is a ver y important subject and Mr. Kimzey will tell us something that will be good for us to hear. Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen:—I was somewhat surprised at being asked to come here and tell how to keep the boys and girls on the farm, a person who lives nearly 400 miles from here, but I think that probably the president knew I was raised on a farm, still lived there, and ILLINOIS STATE DAJRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 45. was educated in the country schools, and probably morein touch with the country children. | My idea of an address may not be whatvoursis. WhenIseethe word *“‘address,” it makes me think of the long speeches, probably one, two, three hours in length that we listened to when attending school. That is not my idea. I wantto have just a plain common talk. I may talk shop some, but that is the talk we need to get, and if certain things may appeal to you, some of which you have thought of before, some that which may be new, I hope they will be discussed or thought of, and when you go back home that your influencein the country wilJ be such as will tend to keep the boys and girls where nature intended them to be kept—at home on the farm, near to nature. There are several causes that lead to the boys and girls leaving the farm. You, who are farmers, who were born and raised on the farm, doubtless remember how, when going to the city, probably to some so- ciety, some entertainment, or, if not, in walking along the streets, how the dudish boys and girls passed you by, looking down,upon you, and you had a feeling of envy and jealousy that your lot was not like theirs. is that not one of the strong reasons of bringing the country boys first to- ward looking to city life as the ideal life? So many of the country communities had no society. Iam glad tosay that now in manyof the communities the country society, the country‘en- tertainments and the country literary work is as goodasinthecity. Itis part of the training to make the boys and girls true citizens of this coun- try. You also doubtless remember how hard it was at four o’clock in the morning in the summer time or harvest time or extra seeding time to getup. The cows had to bemilked and the horses hdd to be cared for. After that the long hours in the field and coming in at night tired, probab- ly would be eight orn:neo’clock, without any recreation. Their work is not easy. In farm work it is necessary at certain seasons of the year for these long hours; do not let us overlook the social feature of the boys and girls. Itisdrudgery from morning until night until the boys leaves. 40 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. thome to get away fromitall. Now, if the boy was taken as a partner with his father, his wishes consulted a little as to planning the different work and how to raise stock. If he felt he was consulted in this work, would he not have much more direct interest in the work? If the girls were allowed an interest in the poultry, and her wishes were consulted about the house by her mother,would she rot take a greater interest in her work? The only way for couscientious earnest work is to get them interested, to have them feel they are a part of it; not a mere servant. wet them know you want their interest. Then these long winter evenings—keep them interested. Usually the father and mother, as soon as the supper is over, the mother probably gets her knitting and the father gets the paper and settles down to their own work, and the boys and girls are left probably to study their school work or go to bed. Can’t you mothers and fathers look more to the even- ing enjoyment of these children? Why not try once a week probably, or twice, to have the evening, after the supper work is done, devoted to the children’s amusement. Invite some of the neignbors’ children in; have the boys and girls feel you are interested in their pleasures. We hear the cry raised every year of the boys going to the saloons and going to the cities to saloons, there, probably to destruction, while the father and mother at home never once think of providing for their pleasant social evenings, entertainments, etc.,at home. It seems to me it is one of the vital points to be looked at in this country life; that is, if we wish them to like farm work. ‘The Farmers’ Institute,asi any of you know, first started I believe the original bill introduced by Mr. Curtis and your Senator Aspinwall and also the additfonal billforthe free library. This Farmers’ Institute is reaching the farmers, and through them the young people, the boys and giris, in a way that no othermovement has ever done. The Domestic Science part of our College is reaching the ladies and the girls on improv- ed cookery, improved household work and home decorations. These two institutions are awakening the farmers. ILLINOIS STATE DAILRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 47 It has gone farther; in addition the County Institute, farmers’ clubs are being organized. In Illinois that movement is quite in its infancy, but in some of the other states it has been followed for some time and the im- provements on farms in those sections are great. The plan as followed by them is largely that of social gatherings. Probably once a month the farmers’ club has a meeting at one of the homes ofthe neighbors. The forenoon is devoted tc the farm inspection, looking at the barns, stock and premises, condition of the fences, the way the ma- chinery is cared for, and all that sort of thing,andtheytalkitover. The women in the house are inspecting the housewife’s work, her preserves, fruit, the various kind of housework is discussed. In the afternoon a joint program of men and women is held together, and at night the young people come in and havea social evening. In that way you arouse the boys and girls'to study farm conditions, and the first part of the evening is deveted to awritten review of some of the books in the library, sothat it is not wholly social, but some literary work is done as a general finish. This kind of work will put the young folks to stvdying as well as the old people. In villages under township organization, these meetings can be held at the town hall say once a month. Have your club work first and the social work afterwards. ‘Get the young people to have papers on sub- jects, and prepare them gradually to appear in public before others; teach them parliamentary rules and work of that kind, and encourage the social feature. This will interest the boysand girls, and the older people, too, and show them the beauty of farm life. In many of the counties, the country telephone is proving a thing espec- ially beneficial to the women and girls of the farm, for through the bad weather they are not as independent in traveling as their brothers and fathers, but with a country telephone with so many of the farmers in the county on the line, the evenings can be spent with a social chat with their neighbors. In some counties this telephone scheme is working success- fully, with from 20 to 500 farmers on the line, and it igfound to bea great improvement to the home lifeon the farm. In addition to the socialside of the matter, we have to take into con- sideration the size nf the farm. The work on the farm is considerably les- 48 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. sened with the improved machinery of today. Formerly, when a man started out to harrow it took three men-and three or four horses to do the work, that now one man with the new improved gang plows can do in less time, and with all the other improved machinery, there is less need of so much help on the farm, especially where the farmer has two or three boys. And the land is so settled now that it is well nighjfimpossible to buy farius for our boys—it is too.expensive. Is it not more intensive farm- ing instead of extensive farming?If greater study was put to the soil condi- tions, to the climatic conditions existing in the varius counties, instead of having fences with ten to fifieen acres of waste ground on each side of it, we could have small fields divided up and havea closer system of farm- ing and tillage, would it not give employment to more boys on the farm today? About two weeks ago this que tion came up of keeping the boys on the farm, and a number of the farmers present got up and said it was not keep- ing them there so much, as it was furnishing them land to work, if they stayed there. 'They were driven away because of no work for them. In this matter of intensive tarming, it dissolves itself into one of two things, more especially on the question of truck work near cities. Next comes the dairy work, whereby cioser soiling and building up of the lands are thougat of. A small farm willsupportafamily in abundance nowadays, when it formerly required three or four times as large an acreage under the old systems. It seems to me the dairy work isspecially adapted to this inten- sive work, when conducted along the modern methods of soiling and forr- age crops. Doaway with large fieids of pasturage as formerly used. Now let me talk “shop” a little. Does not our present system in the public schools, where we urgeour childrn to finish the country school, complete the examinations, pass the final country examination and from them to the high school, and then from there to the universities or some clleges—all the work being away from the farm—does that not draw our boys and girls from the farm into the various so-called professions of life? The majority of our teachers in the ccuntry schools—I say “our’— ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. AQ I mean more especially in Perry county; in your county it may be differ- ent—but a majority of the teachers are from city homes or the towns and villages. If they are ladies going to the country schools, they dress prob- ably nicer than the country girls, with probably a little more of the frills of fashion; usea little smoother language iAllthis appeals to the coun- try girls as being something above them. If it is the city men teachers, the same holds good. Every teacher, if he or she is a true teacher, is an example that is fcliowed by the children under them. With so many city teachers there is atendency to draw the boys from the farm into the city, instead of keeping them at home. Other conditions being equal, always favor a country teacher for a country school. They know your condi- tions at home and can get into that country school and interest the children in their work so much butter than a person probably better educated can go into the same district, but who is unfamiliar with those conditions. This seems to be one of the features that is very frequently overlooked in this educating the boys and girls. You ask the most of these city teachers about the cifferent breeds of horses, or the difference between a beef or dairy type, or the difference be- tween the kinds of sheep, they will tell you “I don’t know.” And the greater per cent of the teachersin the Teachers’ Institutes would have to acknowledge they do not know what hame sirings are, or else would have to make a guess atit. Acountry teacher can understand the boys and girls of the country in their home work and can interest them as they should be interested. How, then, can we interestthem? How reach them in their own lines of work? I think notby making any additions to the present course of instruction, but by causing them to open their eyes to the every day things about them in the country schools. Every school has thirty min- utes’ time of so-called “observation work.” If the teachers, during that period, not of course all at once, but scattered through the school term, would bring in questions of soil,a study of the soil in the locations where they live; whether sandy soilor loam, or whether acid matter. Let them illustrate it, and would not that get the children to studying their 50 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. home conditions, the conditions in the district where they live, and make true farm life seem tothem something mcre than mere drudgery? If studying horticulture during this period, especially in the spring, there are lots of subjects that would keep them more than interested if they had teachers who understood the subjects themselves. Would not this also interest the parents in the schools; they would say “That teacher knows what she’s doing.” If later the work was cultivation of the orchard, showing how to prevent the dust muck from forming on the trees and pre- vent them from withering, as inorchards no! cultivated; would that not raise them in their estimation? In northern Illinois, if the question of corn raising was considered, Showing the difference between two ears; taking a typical ear, well filled at each end, and explaining about the rows being close together or apart, would that not be another feature in the farm life? Not until we began talking at the Farmers’ Institute and hear- ing the matter discussed, had I realized the great difference in the quality of corn planted from ears which had a large space between the rows, in the deep-grained cob; is not thata thing that would appeal to the boy and his father athome? Then,again. in oat producing counties, the simple treatment for oat Smut would reach a large per centage of the farmers, and a talk on this line given at length would be worth nundreds of dollars, not cnly in the district where they live, but to thé farmers throughow the state of Illinois. All this could be carried on indefinitely. In talking of stock raising, the types of beef animals with the square flat back and the fiat under lines, etc.; then the dairy lines and the bal- anced rations, of which we heard so much today; and the carbo-hydrates and the protein—it is all Greek to them—but if brought in these lessons, after a few lessons bringing up the various kinds of foods and the feeding of tne animals athome, would they not become interested and get them to looking at the significance of the farm work? The main thing is not all technical work, but to open their eyes to see what there is round about them. ; In only one way can this be secured, and this is through your help. I am County Superintendent of Perry County schools and Brother Burton ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 51 in your county, but we cannot put these into the schools unless you fel- lows of the country want itand demandit. In someofthecounties it has been called for; in Wayne county, through agitating the cause in the con- vention at Appleton, it has been placed in the schools there and the results are very satisfactory. In Champaign county, out of 1,600 papers filed for examination, all but less than a Jozen took iessons on agricultural science. These things are what we must demand. You must help to have them taught and it will tend in a large measure to increase the interest of the boys and the girls in the farm work. In Wisconsin, your neighbor state here, so much stress has been giv- en to this subdject, that it is now 1 equired as one of the branches in teach- ers’ examinations. In New York state, the state that probably has been following it longer than any other state, instead of requiring it says\it must be taught. The State University istakingit up end through New York state bulletins are furnished the country teachers ana clubs are organized to study it in nearly every country distiict ia the state of New York. The children are interested and ihe result is, when they leave the country school, instead of going to a medical or some other college, they go to the agricultural college at Cornell. If this was carried out in Illinois, it would bring the same results. The University of Illinois has been issuing circulars, and if the farmers would call for! them, the teachers here would gladly provide these bulletins to you or send them throughout Illinois. Formerly when other states inquired of us concerning this subject, Illinois had to hang her head, but now she has cause to hold} her’ head as high as any state; they are second to no one. Four years ago our Agricultural College was held ita basement of anumber of ciher buildings at Champaign, with cracks in the walls, but today a ccllege building, second to none, stands there with nearly two hundred stucents in the agricultural course. It is not alone for the boys, but there is the domestic feature for the girls. There is no reason why our college, instead of 200 boys and girls, should 52 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. not have 2000 boys and girls. Itis not always necessary to stay the}full two years, or four years for a degree. Goand stay one year, two years, or even four months if you can’t stay any longer. All gained in this way will make the boy and girl more contented with the farm life and give them an object to attain. At the present time, the great power of the United States lies in her agricultural population. If the boys and girls were properly educated, would they not feel that the agriculteral work, the farm work, instead of being something to be ashamed of and being called clodhoppers, was the future of the country in which they could havea share. Itrust with your help that this will all come to pass, and that our country boys and girls will stay on the farm. . Recitation by Elmer Thayer. lncored. Music by Bibler’s orchestra. Song by Mr. Bagley. Encorec. THE CREAMERY PATRON’S COW. PROF. E. H. FARRINGTON, MADISON, WIS. Ladies and Gentlemen:— It is 4 great pleasure to attend one of these conventions. ‘The first dairy convention I ever attended was in this state about ten years ago, and I think I have attended more dairy conventions in Illinois than any other state. Prof. Morrell was one of the leading members of the asso- ciation; L. M. Potter and several others who passed away. And some of the men have left the association and do not attend any longer; still there are some that I recognize, so that I always feel at home to come to the Illinois State Dairy Association conventions. | I have a certain program I want to carry out this evening and the first thing is to read somefewfeeble remarks I have written and then I ILLINOIS STATE LAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 53 will give you a few pictures onthe screen. I will try and not speak too long. A short time ago I was attending a meeting, and a man got up and he talked over two hours and when he finally quit, a man said that the speaker reminded him of a horse he had, they had to pull his nose to make him drink and pull his tail off to make him stop. In discussing this important factor of the dairy industry, I wish to make it plain at the beginning that I am not the champion of any partic- ular breed of cows; my knowledge of the different strains or types of dairy cows is not sufficient to enable me to enlarge on the advantages of of a long horned cow over a short rorn, neither dol pretend to say thata Guernsey, a Jersey, a Holstein, or an Ayrshire is the best cow for a cream- ery patron to keep. My information on the cow question is confined to observations made at some of the 95 farms that are supplying milk tothe Wisconsin Dairy School. In visiting these farms during the past seven years, I have not at- tempted to train myself so that i night become sufficiently expert to tell a farmer all about the different cows in his herd by simply looking them over while sitting in a buggy in the highway, but my efforts have all been directed towards trying to induce the farmer to keep a record of what his cows are doing. This it seems to me is going to heip him, and I am afraid if I tried to discuss the points of a cow with a patron, that I would be in the plight of thd professor of agriculture who was once talk- ing with a young lady Sache suddenly turned on him and asked: ‘“Pro- fessor, can you tell a good cow?’’ “The professor, without any hesitation, replied: ‘Why, yes, I thinkIcan.” ‘Then what would you tell her?” said the young lady. I did not wait to hear the rest of this interesting conversation, but without further celay I wish to say that my position on the cow question is expressed in the text, “By their fruits ye shall know .them.” If acow gives milk and butter enough in a year to pay for her keep and a profit besides, she is worth telling something of a story about, but if her production is less than the cost of her food then the less told about her the better; it is encouraging, however, once in a while to hear 54 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. some one report that an unprofitable cow has been disposed of, and to know that such an animal is no longer being bought and sold among creamery ,patrons. The lack of exact knowledge regarding the annual production of each cow in a creamery patron’s herd is in some cases rather surpris- ing. It often happens that the cows are milked and fed in the same routine way every year, and if the check form the creamery is not large enough to suit the patron—and it never is—then a great many com- plaints are heard about the price of butter, or the cost of feed, and very little if any effort is made to find cut whether or not the cows are what. they should be. An illustration or two will serve to show the extent to which some creamery patrons make an effort to think, or how well informed they are, about their cows and their business affairs. I once asked a farmer, who was bringing milk to the creamery, what breed o% cows he kept, and he said, “Oh, I don’t know, I guess they are Poland China cows.” Another patron, who was drawing his own and some of the neighbor’s. milk to the factory, came to seeme one day about the price he was receiving for his work. He said he had come to the conclusion that he could not afford to make the trip unless he was paid a dollar and a half a day; I asked him what he was getting and he said: he didn’t know, but it wasn’t enough. I looked up the record showing how much he had _ received for several months and found from his own creamery checks that he had been paid $1.75 per day for drawing milk. This was twenty-five cents more than he said he wanted, but he had not taken the trouble te find out how much he was receiving before he came in tomake his comylaint and demand of $1.50 per day. It is too often the case that creamery patrons keep no records what- ever, and do not have the slightest idea as to where they are at. They look at the amount of their check without thinking that the size of their cows, and their own size, isresponsible for the size of their monthly check. Many of them talk likea woman I met on the streets Decem- ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. ‘ber 23rd. As I passed herI said, ‘Good morning Mrs. Blank, 1 suppose you are out buying Christmas presents this morning.” “No,” she said, “it’s too hard times to buy Christmas presents this year; the creamery don’t pay enough for the milk.” Now that woman keeps nine cows, and the creamery paid her $250.00 in a year for the milk she sent to it. This is between $25.00 and $35.00 per cow per year that she receives, and she never once thinks that it is the cow’s fault, or her own fault, that she does not get more money but according to her way of thinking, —and there are others that are of the same opinion—the fault lies in the price of butter, the creamery management, or the hard times. There is such a tendency in human nature “to look out and not in,” as the Sunday school teacher use to tell us; to think that the causes of our hard lot are all outsideourown cdoor-yard instead of in it; that we are sometimes helped by being reminded that a litile investigation at home may be a profitable undertaking. This sort of an inquiry would be very helpful to many farmers, if thas can be led to realize what a differ- ence there is in the earninz capacity of the cows in their own herds, and then be induced to part with those that eat more than they produce; when they have done this the prices of butter and the “hard times” will not be continually worryingthem. There’s nothing like the inspiration of playing a winning game to make us forget our troubles, and this being true, the most cheerful dairymaan ought to be the one who knows the most about his cows. It was with the hope of helping creamery patrons and of illustrating the conditions of some dairy herds to the dairy interests of that state that we undertook, some four years ago, to begin testing the cows of the patrons supplying milk to the Wiccnsin Dairy School. These patrons keep cows and deliver milk tothe factory in the same way as is custo- mary at the creameries and cheese factories throughout the state. They do not have large herds, and it was observed during the past year that the cows owned by one hundred of them were probably similar to the one miliion in the state. Only eight out of one hundred patrons kept more 56 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. than twenty cows, and there were thirty-five who each owned from two | to five cows only. This shows that the majority of our patrons do not pretend to be dairymen in the sense of making the production of milk a serious business, and I fear thai there are many other creamery patrons in so-called dairy districts who du not allow the cows to make much of an impression on their minds; other lines of farming crowds the cows out, so that they receive only a little attention at milking time. During the past year we have, like other creameries, urged our patrons to take samples of each cow’s milk and allow us to test them, as this will aid in obtaining definite knowledge of the amount of milk and butter each cow produces. The patron’s usual reply to these suggestions is that he “supposes it would be a good plan to test his cows,” or he plainly states that “it is too much bother to take samples.’”’ He is either so much at- tached to his cows that he does net care to take part with any of them even if it is proved that some cows do not produce milk enough to pay for their feed, or he seems to think that he knows enough about his cows without having their milk tested. Noone of our patrons during the past seven years has voluntarily brought samples of milk to us for any length of time with the request that we test them for him. This indifference to an exact knowledge of the profit or loss from cows is common among farmers, and on account of it they suffer annually very large financial losses. It is therefore plain thatthe possessor of such a disposition is as worthy a subject for investigation as are the cows he owns; and it was with the hope of convincing our patrons that cow records are valuable that we began a systematic testing of a number of herds in August, 1897. In preparation for these tests we had boxes made for carrying four- ounce sample bottles of milk from the farms to our creamery. Small books in which might be recorded the weight of each cow's milk oncea week, and accurate weighing scaies were also provided. We offered this outfit to cur patrons and agreed to test all samples they would send us if these were taken for one Gav atregular intervals of one. two or four weeks during the year. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Wy, Some patrons inquired how much we would pay them for the extra work of weighing each cow’s miik once a week ,and this suggestion proved to ve the only way in which we couid get the work started, so we finally agreed to pay $1.00 per cow to such patrons as would weigh and sample the miik of each cow in their herds at least once a month for one year. Even this inducement did not make much impression on the patrons, and we were able to test six herds oniy the first year, begin- ing August Ist, 1897. These tests included the weighing, samplirg and testing of the milk of forty cows once every week through one complete period of lactation; ceieven more cows were tested for a part of the year. Since that time the testing ef patrons’ herds has continued. During the year, beginning April 1, 1899, sixty-two cows of nine farms were tested through one complete period of lactation and fifty-four cows for only part of the year. The following year fifty cows on six farms were tested, and up to the present time 217 cows on thirteen of our patrons’ farms have been tested. These tests represented 135 ‘complete and 98 partial per- iods of lactation. The cows in three herds were tested for three years consecutively, and four other herds were tested for twe years. During the first year of testing, the milk of each cow was weighed and tested once each week, but it was impossible to ge this done so often after the first year. Some patrons were willing to weigh and sample the milk of each cow once intwo weeks and others could only be induced to do this “extra work” once a mnpnth. The results obtained by this three years of testing have shown that farmers may gain a great deal of useful information by such work, and that it is one of the most profitable fields for careful observation in the whole domain of agriculture. A description of our methods of making the tests and some of the re- sults obtained may be of interest to other creamery patrons . METHOD OF MAKING THE FARM TEST. The milk of each cow was weighed and sampled at the morning and light milking one day in each week, every two weeks or once a month, as 58 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. - the patron desired. The testing day was selected by the patron. Each dairy was supplied with a pair of scales for weighing the milk, "a box of bottles for milk samples,a small 1l-once tin sampling dipper and a record book. Each cow was given a number which was also placed on the label of a 2-ounce sample bottle, the cow being given a number which was only known by this number throughout the test. About 4% gram of potassium bichromate was added to each sample bottie to keep the milk sweet until tested. The bcx of saraples and the record books were sent to the University creamery, wuoere tne saniples were tested; the.tests were recorded in the patron’s book as well as in the permanent record at the creamery, after whicik the book and box of sample bottles were re- turned to the farm. The following instructions were plainly written on the first few pages of the record book sent with each box of sampling bottles: DIRECTIONS. Give each cow a permanent name or number. Provide a place for using the scales at milking time. pis Oe tee Select a milk-weighing: pail or bucket. 4, Record the weight of this empty pail, or provide some sure way of deducting its weight from eack iot of milk. 5. After milking a cow dry, pour all her milk into the weighing pail, 6. Record the weight of this milk in the proper place in the book. 7. Pour milk from weighinging pail into milking bucket and imme- diately dip a sample from it into a bottle having the number of this cow. 8. The sample from the first milking should only fill the bottle one- half full. 9. At the next milking repeat the weighing and sampling and pour the second sample into the same battle that was previously half filled. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 59 10. Each sample bottle shovid contain a mixture of milk from two consecutive milkings of one cow. | 11. Cork the same botiles to prevent evaporation. 12. Weigh and sample the milk of each cow once, twice or four times. per month. 13. Note time of each milking. 14. Record the date each cow caives. 15. State how many Gays each calf was fed its mother’s milk. 16. How did you dispose of each calf. 17. Weekly statement of cow’s feed, including the weight, price and kind of grain, if any, with the amount and kind of hay, cornstalks or other coarse fodder. 18. Health of cows. 19. Note of any change of miikers. 20. Record dat2 when cow was dry. - One farmer, with twelve cows, estimated that fifteen minutes extra time was required to weigh, sample and record the milk of his @ows on testing days. At another place the records were taken by a boy who was too: young to milk, but capable of doing the extra work required at milking time on testing day.. At one farm this work was done by the women, who strongly objected to it, especially when it was necessary to use a lan- tern at the barn in winter. ACCURACY OIF THE RECORDS. The accuracy of such records as these is necessarily influenced by conditions common to nearly allfarms. Milking is usually done with more or less haste, especially at the planting, haying or harvesting sea- sons. The milkers, as a rule, are rot accustomed to the use of scales. and often consider a weight withiii one pound of the true figure to be ‘near enough.” They do not understand the necessity of promptness in sampling milk after it has been poured from one pail to another before the cream has begun toseparate. Ji spite of these and other disturbing 60 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. factors, our results show that tests of dairy cows can be made by the farmers themselves with sufficient accuracy to give a very satisfactory knowledge of the performance of each cow. From these weights and samples taken at the farm, the total annual production of a cow is found by muitiplying the average of the daily weights of milk and of butter fat taken each month by the number of days in the month and adding the products together. The money value of the milk of each cow is found by multiplying the monthly weight of butter fat by a certain figure which, during the year ending August 1, 1898, was one-half cent less than the average Elgin market price of butter for that month; in 1900 and 1901 it was the average Elgin price. (These are the prices which the creamery paid all its patrons for milk.) The figures obtained for each month are added together fo find the pro- duction for a year, < FEED AND CARE OF THE HERDS. The cows at each farm were fed and cared for during the entire year according to the usual practice of their owners. As far as we could ascer- tain, all the cows at one farm were fed in the same way. No attempt was made to vary the feed of each cow excepting that where grain feeding was practiced, it was usually stopped while a cow was giving little or no milk. ‘ At farm ‘‘C,” the owner kept a careful record of all grain bought and fed to his cows during 1898. His estimate of this feed is given below: (The grain feed consists of cornand oats ground together, corn meal and bran, of about 15 tons of grain at $12.00 per ton.) ESTIMATED FEED COST AND RECEIPTS FROM TWELVE COWS. EXPENSES. Grain bought during the Vear .. ss. Ss ew cose wse,vieh plete oueteue ne cnn $180.00 80 acres cornstalks, $2.00 per acre ..... Coen be'e boc bk « jo/y vel ete nnn tina ILLINOIS STATE DAJRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 61 STIS a oe ne 50.00 'Heacres 200d pasturage and 15 acres woodland ......6 .ccccccssnee 65:00 Mermetaay, OL TCCO. ic elves veins vee ee ave AAAS CR ets Mn Caer Smee enor. $355.00 RECE!PTS. erwem ear ili At CFCAMLETY s\..0. 0s e0 aniedessvecca os $572.00 ee 9D) O. 75 '< «3S > 6 16a ado vl'ehelec blah NUN alate adele! 6 e:),6 ole 66.09 Mol, 75G02 990» cd lxnlol bc abe dake dial-e w/v yae.e.0 ce aoed tog $638.00 60,000 pounds of skim milk, 10c per 100 pounds ........... 60.09 Beene OE ACCO COST «2... ccs ce ecccece sventeusioe os $343.00 $698.00 $698.00 This shows that the estimated cost of feed at Farm ‘“‘C” was nearly $30.00 per cow and the averagelreceipts per cow were a little over $58.00 Assuming that the manure will pay for the care of the cow, the owner of this herd received an average profit of $28.00 per cow. | Each cow at this farm was fed about the same amount of grain and hay during the period of stable-feeding—November 1 to May 1. The grain was fed dry just before milking, 10 to 14 lbs. per head being fed per day to cows in milk. Hay was fed the last thing at night after milk- ing. During daytime the cows were turned into a sheltered yard where they were fed cornstalks that hac been stacked near the barn at husk- ing time. The cornstalks were well eaten, and it is probable that the cows Satisfied their differences in appetite on the cornstilks, if, as stated each one was given the same amount of hay and grain. The cows had access to well water during theentire year, and were in pasture from May to November. When cows were fresh the calf was allowed to have-its mother’s milk for about three weeks, when it was sold for veal. No exact Teeding record could be obtained, except at this farm; at the other farms corn, bran or shorts, ground oats, pasture grass and a very 62 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. little hay were fed in uncertain amounts, and apparently with no definite plan. At one farm no money was spent for feed during the year, but the corn and oats were raised at Lome supplied all the grain the cows received, except that some oats were exchanged for bran to give the cows a variety of feed. Although there was quite’a contrast in the feeding and management at the different farms, the method of weighing and testing the milk of each cow was the same in each case. These tests are of course of inore value to the owners of the herds tested than to anyone else, but some illustrations of general interest may be drawn from them. The cows on one farm were tested for three years. The average re- ceipts per cow in 1898, from the creamery, were $36.30; in 1900, $39.20; and in 1901, $38.92. In 1898, seven of the twelve cows produced less than the average of the herd; in 1900 seven of the eleven were below the aver- age, and in 1901, there were six cows under the average production of the herd. The figures do not show much indication that the owner has prof- ited by the tests. The cows that did not produce enough milk to pay a profit on their feed were kept in the herd for three years, and five other cows produced less than $30.00 worth of butter in a year. The annual production of the mature cows during the three years shows that the poor cows did not improve from year to year, but con- tinued to give less milk than required to pay for the feed consumed. The one good cow was equally persistent in doing well. The creamery value of her milk for three years was $200.00. This is $110.00 more than the cost of her feed when we take $30.00 per year as the value of a cow’s feed. The butter produced by the cther five cows tested for three years amounted to only $114.00 more than the cost of their feed during the same time. The milk of one cow, therefore, paid the owner within four dollars as much profit in three years, as the milk of five cows in the same herd for the same length of time. In another herd, the excess of butter over cost of feed of two cows ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 63 was worth $60.00, while that of five other cows was worth only $58.00. Thus the owner received at the creamery $2.00 less for the milk of five cows than he did for that of two cows in the same herd. The entire herd of twelve cows owned by one farmer only paid a profit of $75.00 in a year, and three of the twelve cows paid $50.00 of this amount, leaving $25.00 as the combined profit of the other nine cows in the herd. Another herd of twelve cows paid a profit of $228.00 in a year, but in this herd there was one cow that earned only $8.00 profit, and another that earned $31.00 profit, a difference of about 400 per cent in the annual butter value of these two cows te their owner. | Many more startling illustrations might be given from the records of the different herds, but a suminary statement of the best and the poor- est cows is sufficient to show the vaiue of this kind of work to the far- mer. Table showing variations during one year in the butter value of the cows in each herd: CREAMERY PAID CREAMERY VALUE OF Patron ; ig Total Average Best Poorest Average . in herd. Cash. per cow. Cow. Cow. Cow. A—1898 ......... 12 $421 $35.11 $53.35 $28.72 $36.30 Ss a 11 405 36.82 82.23 20.18 39.20 A—1TGOL ois ieee 11 424 38.56 64.93 23.51 38.92 a). 5) oy Fo eid 58.21 44.83 50.00 fe cca e's 12 572 7.70 60.72 37.96 48.83 (} i 6 228 38.00 55.49 39.60 44.12 (pS: 6 Le ey 51.28 28.40 44.42 Te 5 227 45.40 67.47 44.40 58.40 1900. 3... es 5 68.16 43.47 61.20 >) |] re 4 70.72 59.47 62.11 F—-1898 ......... 9 60.29 34.00 kre F—1900 ......... 7 “os eee 58.70 31.90 44.00 G—1900 ......... 14 563 40.00 72.21 39.32 56.57 H—1900 ......... 8 358 44,75 66.08 17.23 50.00 H—1901 se 8 332 41.50 62.71 46.65 56.00 I—1901 ......... 24 Se eae 67.85 14.56 39.00 JI—1901......... 7 270 38.60 51.14 37.58 46.00 K—1900 ......... 8 293 37.00 54.61 22.35 39.00 &---1901 ........ one 8 248 31.00 46.81 36.69 42.00 64 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. (1.) Figures are not obtained because patrons did not bring milk to the creamery during the en‘ire year; samples of each cow’s milk were, however, tested. ? If, as stated, each farmer fed all his cows in the same way, and the time and labor of milking and feecing the cows was approximately the same for both good and poor cows, it follcows that it did not cost any more to feed the best than the poorest cows in the herd. The informa- tion furnished by such tests as these may be very valuable to the owner of the cows, and it should be of vital importance to the cow as her life ought to depend upon the recc\d she makes. Previous to making the tests, the owners of these cows had very little, if any, accurate idea of the relative value of their cows, but the records show that the information gained is worth many times the cost of a milk weighing scale, a Babcock milk test and the time necessary to use them. | (Then shows pictures of different cows.) By the president:—Before leaving, I would like to ask the citizens. of Freeport to help fill these seats. We shall have excellent programs both day time and evening tomorrow. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 65 Wednesday Morning, January 8th, 1902 President in the chair. Convention called to order 10 o’clock a. m. POULTRY CULTURE AS AN ADJUNCT TO DAIRYING. BY B. F. WYMAN, SYCAMORE, ILLINOIS. Mr. President, Ladies and gentlemen: If I have anything in my paper that anyone takes exceptions to, you may interrupt me at any time, and I will make any explanation needed. Dairying as an industry has not and is not proving as profitable a bus- “iness as the hard, Peocous burdens it places upon those engaged there- in, demand that it should be. One cf the greatest profits derived from the industry, is in its retention of'soil fertility. A kind of an invisible profit, many people will say, but, nevertheless, one of the greatest advantages over other farming, is, that it retnoves so little of the fertility of our farms that is so absolutely necessary for the production of good crops. For this reason we are loath to give up the business, although the visible profits are small. We believe radical changes are pending in our methods of dairying, and that the time is not far distant when a better product will be demanded of the dairymarn, and a better product will demand better prices, and better prices may insure better profit. 66 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. In the meantime, however, the average dairyman needs an additional income to add to the small profits for his dairy. An industry that re- quires but little outlay, and one that returns a large and constant per cent of profit should be selected, and in tnis connection “Poultry as an adjunct to the dairy” seems to fit most adn:‘rably. Poultry culture is succeptible of being made a profitable business by itself, but it requires as aptitude for the business and considerable special training besides, for one to embark in the field of poultry cul- fure, to the exclusion of other work. There are, however, several very good reasons why it is especially adapted to chink in as a very profitable aid to the dairy. First, because it is on a farm where there is always plenty of room for a free range. As a dairy farm is also a grain farm for the production of food for the cow, there is always more or less waste of grain that poultry would gather and convert into one of the most nec- essary’and luxurious products, without expense. Innumerable insects are also converted by poultry into the same valuable product. Skim milk, a product of the dairy, when fed to poultry has been made to pro- duce more than 40'per cent more pron than grainfedalone. Many dairies require more milkers than afc necessary to do the other work, and the utilizing of such labor can be made a valuable factor of profit, by its be- ing systematically used in caring for poultry. ‘The cost to the dairy far- mer of installing a poultry plant would be little, because of the many barns, sheds, cribs, stacks, etc., upon so many dairy farms. They make ldeal places for biddy to deposit her egg, and I believe tend to a large production. The natural instinct of the domestic fowl to hide her nest is notjyet entirely eradicated, and Iam notsure but that it should be observed as an important factor in egg production, and in but few places would the op- portunity be so favorable as upon the dairy farm. When such excep- tional conditions exist, and the systematic care is given the hen, that should be given the cow, the dairy farmer may reasonably expect a much larger per cent of profit from “iis fowls than from his cows. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 67 The average dairyman and farmer prefers to keep a large number of cows and cultivate large areas of ground, so that when his products are sold, he will get large sums of iaoney forthem. It matters but little to him whether there is much profit above the cost of production, so Jong as he has the pleasure and satisfaction of handling the large sums of money. He is not, in most instasices, keeping an account of the cost of production, but assumes, because he has received considerable sums of money, that there must be a good profit, but when his expenses are all paid, cannot understand where his profits are. There should be more pleasure in making two dollars, and keeping one of them as profit, than in making two hundred without any profit. And right in this connection is where the “Chicken business’? comes in. It is not an industry in which ene can get large sums of money at any one time. But like the pennies that are indispensable factors in making up the dollars that constitutes the wealth of the millionaires, so the daily sums received for poultry and its production, exceed in value every other agricultural production of the nation. Poultry culture has had so little thought bestowed upon it as a com- mercial industry, that but compartively few people are aware of the mag- nitude and the wonderful possibilities of its development as a branch of farm production. If every farriner would keep a strict account with every crop produced, and every kind of stock and poultry raised, they would be astonished at the result, and many would find that after due credit had been given their poultry for all the eggs, feathers and increase produced, at market rates, it wouli save them a larger profit than some of their most important crops. It is a branch of farm industry that, un- til recently has always occupieda position far in the rear of all other farm industries, but it is at the present time fast forcing itself upon the notice of the farmers of the country, as a branch of their business that demands better treatment at their hands. The very fact of its having survived the long years of oppression to which it has; been subjected, is a strong exemplification of the law of the survival of the fittest, and 68 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. should be the strongest possible evidence that the farmer needs to in- duce him to give it a fair trial under favorable conditions, and not compel his poultry at all times to‘ scratch” for a living, Piewaruise the ideal place for poultry, and the cnly place where it can be made to reach its greatest development and perfection, and when the farmer ap- plies the same business prudencein the management of-his poultry that he should exercise in all his business affairs,. then he will be able ta fully appreciate its value. The culinary value and importance of eggs could only be fully ap- preciated by being deprived of them in all their different methods of cook- ery, and their entire absence in pies, cakes, custards, puddings, confec- tionery, etc., and in all the innumerable ways in which they are used’ by nearly every family in the land. That they are a delicious wholesome and valuable adjunct to every tabie, all will admit. Then the toothsome roast duck and goose always create a wonderful sense of satisfaction and comfort in ones gastronomicregion about holiday time, and should be much more liberally used at all other times of the year than they now are. Turkeys and chickens are always in order, most always cheap, are delicious and appetizing, and always @ standby for the preacher’s period- ical visit, and almost as indispensable to the health, comfort and happi- ness of the family. For many years, it has been said that corn was king, but poultry has been a close competitor, some years heading the list, and is certainly en- titled to be be considered the ‘“‘queen of farm products.” The consumption of eggs ani poultry in the state of New York, ex- elusive of her transient population, is said to amount to nine dollars per capita. Applying that as a basis for the 75 millions of our population at the present time, we have an aggregate of 675 millions, as the total con- sumption for one year. Taking the census figures of 1880 and 1890, and it is an easy matter figuring on a moderate estimate of production, to make nearly as large a showing. The Statistican of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, in his official report ILLINOIS STATE LAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 69 for 1900, gives the following figures asthe production and cash value of some of the leading farm crops: Production Bushels. Value. RP OUT, 2 os Sate 0a 2,105,102,516 $751,220,034 WCAG oreaie ox 522,229,505 323,515,177 Cais i. 2 et 809,125,989 208,669,233 Tons. MS eee f afalers - 50,110,908 445 538,870 Cotton 2 222 334,847,868 Poultry at 600 million exceed all other products except corn, by more than 150 million dollars. It exceeds the dairy, beef, pork and sheep products. The corn crop has exceeded it in value 10 times in the last six- teen years. Until recent years, we have annually imported millions of dozens of eggs from other countries, but the growth of the industry has been so great that in the year 1900, ourimports were only 135,038 dozens, while our exports for same year were 5,920,725 dozens valued at $984,081.00. The vaiue of the imports were only $8,741.00. As before remarked, it isthe small items in the poultry business that makes such an enormous aggregate in the whole, and insured the large profits of thé business. If each one of the 75 million inhabitants of the United States had eaten one egg for breakfast this morning, at the wholesale price of 24 cents per dozen, it would amount to $1,500,000.00. The average wholesale prices for eggs in New York, Cincinnati, St. Louis and Chicago for the year 1900 was almost exactly 15 cents perdozen. If every person in the Unit2d States should eat one egg per day for one year at that price, their value would be $342,000,000.00. The city of St. Louis consumes on an average 432,036 per day every day in the year, or nearly one per day for each inhabitant. If the city of St. Louis consumes that number, it is only fair to assume that all other cities) will consume as many per capita. If the cities consume nearly one egg per day per « 70 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. capita, the country will do much better than that, for on nearly all farms they are used in the greatest profusion, and must largely exceed the city consumption. Galen Wilson, in “Farm and Fireside” requested an old crippled sol- dier, engaged in poultry raising, to give his views, and received the fol- lowing: “Eggs are alwayscash; they are ready for market the minute laid, and the sooner they are sent to market the better. They require no cultivation, pruning or harvesting, but are at once in salable condition. With plenty of eggs on the farm there is a host of good things in the kitchen and money intie family purse. Gathering up eggs is like picking up dimes and dollars. Great is the hen that produces them. When everything else is dull in winter the egg basket has wonderfully helped out many a poor farmer. The crops may be poor, the provisions iow, the family cow dry, with a long wait for the next growing season, but the hen comes up smiling, ana isready to get a pound of tea or a sack of flour. If treated well, she willresrond as readily when the snow is on the ground as when the fields are green. She is a friend to the rich and poor alike.” As stated above, the farmisthe place of all others where poultry cul- ture can be made the most profitatle. It is the place of all others where it can obtain its greatest development at the least care and expense. In no other places are the facilities for improvement in fowls so great. In the development of speed in the horse; in the development oz the produc- tive powers of the cow, and in the fattening of beeves and swine, won- derful results have been achieved. Breeding for speed, for farm, for color, for fat, butter, milk nnd cheese in farm stock has been reduced to a science, and the results of the work of poultry fanciers is as susceptible of improvement in breeding for form, for type in fether and marking as any kind of farm stock, when the same rules are applied in their man- agement. The results of the work ef the poultry fancier in the improve- ment of poultry in recent years has been marvelous. The work has been accomplished at the expense of great care and patience and accompanied ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 7% with many failures. The increascd interest in poultry raising during the past few years has resulted ina perfection of breeds that has put the American poultry breeder at the head of all the nations. Only a few years ago there were no pure bred fowls worth mention- ing, whiie at this time there are men i: nearly all the states whe are widely known because of their skill and success in breeding poultry. Thefanciers work, when thoroughly learned, with the present large demand for pure bred pouliry, must of all necessity prove much more remunerative tham the production of poultry and eggs for market. From competent author- ity we learn that two or three hundred dollars are sometimes realized as. the result of a single setting of eggs of some of the highly prized breeds. Such prices are, of course, exceptional, and should not be considered by any one contemplating cngaging in the business. The cost of keeping fowls, in proportion to their income, as compared with other stock, is small. We should take into consideration the fact that for a large por- tion of the year they notcnly obtain their living, but do an immense amount of good in the destruction of noxious insects. Mr. J. R. Brahazon of Wisconsin, a successful breeder of many years experience, gives the cost at 95c a vear tu keep a hen in a good thrifty conditicn, and the same authority fAgures a profit of $1.21, cr more than 100 percent. While it is not our purpose in this paper to figure the profits of the business, yet the showing of what some have done and what others may accomplish, cannot be out of place, and if a profit of over 100 per cent _ can be made by one person in the vroduction of eggs and poultry, itisa practical demonstration of the fact that others can do equally as well, al- though it must not be assumed that every kind of fowl will make sucha showing. The best pure breeds or their crosses should be selected, and every person must determine for themscives by the circumstances surrounding them which of the breeds are besi adapted ‘to their wants. While it _ 72 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. would not be advisable for every one to attempt to raise fancy or pure bred pouitry for breeding purposes, there can be no mistake made by any one in their efforts to improve their stock by the introduction of pure blood. Poultry raising is an occupation that is: not confined to men and boys, but is a light, agreeable ana profitable occupation for women and girls as well, and until recent years, the care and management of poultry was almost entirely given over:to them. Very many women love the work, and when the surroundings are favorable, they frequently become en- thusiastic in it, and the results accomplished by them furnish a prolific source for “pin money” for themselves, and aid very materially to the living of the family and income of the farm. The question of marketing poultry and its products is an important one ,and should not be lost sight of in determining the profits of the busi- ness, for the attractiveness of all produce and add much to their value and insure ready sales at an advanced price, as evidenced by this extract from the “Wisconsin Farmer:” 7 “My seventeen-year old daughter has an eye to business, and, noting the very tidy and attractive style in which many articles of merchan- dise are put up now-a-days, she concluded the scheme was applicable to many farm products as! well, and when fitting a lot of poultry for market, she guve itatrial. Shemarketed 40 dressed chickens the last week in December, selling’ them through a Chicago commission house. The November lot was diy-picked. drawn and the skin of the neck tied with a common string. They were packed in tke ordinary way in a bar- rel, and shipped. The net returns were 814 cents per pound. The De- - cember lot was from the same flock and no better and no fatter. They were dressed precisely the same, but the neck and the skin was carefully trimmed with shears, and tied with a cheap, narrow blue ribbon in a double bow knot. The feet were thoroughly cleaned, and each fowl placed in a sitting position, and when cold the same kind of ribbon was tide around the body, over the feet. with a bow knot on the back. She ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 73 obtained a store box of sufficient size anid plained off ali lettering. A row of unbroken rye straw, the length of the heighth of the inside of the box was placed on andj around the ends and sides of the box about one and one-half inches thick, witha layer of straw on the bottom. This’ was covered with fowls placed closely together with their backs up. A course of straight rye straw was put over these, followed by more birds, and so on until the box wasfull. The box was then shipped to the same firm and the net return was 13 cents per pound, while the market quota- tions were a quarter of a cent per pound less than in November. A letter accompanying the remittance said it was the most attractive lot of dressed poultry ever seen in that market, and that 100 boxes like it could have been sold in one hour.” There are many rocks upon which the hopes of the poultry raiser sometimes get wrecked. In-breeding is one of the most prolific sources of danger, and is far too prevalent in the country at the present time, and to insure strong, healthy fowls anda plentifulsupply of eggs, should be studiously avoided. Keeping a large number of fowls together has proven another fruit- ful source of danger, and has resulted disastrously to many who have made the attempt. To pire success in raising poultry on a large scale, separate runs should be provided and there is practically no limit to the number which can be kept except jack of space. Another error frequently made is that of keeping fowls until they are past their usefulness. They should be disposed at two years or three at the most. If kept longer they will not sell for “spring chickens.” In raising poultry for market, chickens should always be sold as proilers when hatched carly and are large enough to realize the high prices nearly always prévalent in ihe early part of the season. The net returns are usually much larger,and it saves! the cost of extra growth, anc the danger of loss by death is avoided. Finally, to insure success, provide your fowls with zood warm houses, with plenty of sunshine. Give them pure water and a generous supply of 74 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. food of a suitable kind, and in every way exercise such care as wiilinsure the greatest comfort to your fowls and in return the law of reciprocity will be fully carried out, and they cannot help a liberal response in the “way of eggs and chickens to the generous treatment accorded them. Unlike nearly every other farm product that is cultivated only in certain sections, poultry is susceptible of culture throughout theland. All classes of people participate in its benefacticns. The growth of the demand for poultry and its products insures liberal markets. It is one of the most in- viting fields of all farm culture, and to the dairyman who inteliigently incorporates it as a branch os his business, it offers the grandest and most fruitful possibilities. The wide-awake hustling peop'e of Kansas, through their State Board of Agriculture, express the following opinion of the hen, entitled: ' THE KANSAS HEN. We have read of Maud,on a summer day, Who raked barefooted, the new-mown hay; We have read of the maid in the early morn, Who milked the cow with the crumpled horn. And we've read the lays that the poets sing Of the rustling corn and the flowers of spring, But of all the lays of tongue or pen There’s naught like the lay of the Kansas Hen. Long, long before Maud rakes her hay The Kansas hen has begun to lay. And ere the milkmaid stirs a peg, The hen is up and has dropped her egg: The corn must rustle and the flowers spring If they hold their own with the barn yard ring. If Maud is) needing a hat and gown She doesn’t hustle her hay to town, But goes to the store and cbtains her suit ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 75 With a basketful of her fresh hen fruit. If the milkmaid’s beau makes a Sunday call She doesn’t feed him on milk at all, But works up eggs in a custard pie, And stuffs him full ofa chicken fry. And when the oid man wants a horn, Does he take the druggist a load of corn? Not much!, He simply robs a nest, And to town he goes—you know the rest: He hangs around with the cliques and rings, And talks of politics and things, While his poor wife stays at home and scowls, But is saved from want by these selfsame fowls; For, while her husband lingers there, She watches the cackling hen with care, And gathers eggs, andthe eggs she’ll hide Till she saves enough the stem to tide. Then hail! All hail! the Kansas hen, The greatest blessing of all to men; Throw up your hats and emit a howl For the persevering barn vard fowl! Corn may be King, but its plainly seen, The Kansas hen,isthe Kansas Queen. DISCUSSION. Mr. Johnson: Did you ever take a number of fowls and chickens ana feed them, keeping track of the cost to you, and know what the profit to you was on the chickens? My experience has been if you keep a certain ' number, and beyond that there is. no profit unless you are so situated that you can steal feed from the neighbors. A. Unfortunately farmers are so far off the chickens get away and stay there. I started the attempt of keeping large numbers together, but it was disastrious. =6 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Q. My point is, that it does not pay to keep a large number of fowls together and feed them. The best way is to have a certain number? A; Yes: sit: A Member: I want tosay for Mr. Johnson’s information that four years ago I lived in Chicago and I had 85 brown Leghorn hens. 1 kept them in the yard and never let them out. I charged them with every- thing that went into the yard!except the care. I cannot give you the figures of the production. I fed about five pecks of wheat ina year. I have kept poultry for 20 years, fancy poultry, and it is possible, without going to any particular trouble, to make money and make it easy off chickens. The kind of fcod which will produce the most milk will pro- duce the most eggs. They are largely albumen and the food for use for your cattle is the kind that makes your hens lay best—-oats, corn, wheat and bran, and skim milk takes the place of a whole lot of other things. I 'met a man inj Springfield the other day and he was telling me his ex- periences. He keeps a dairy farm and gives his chickens skim milk, all they will take. He goes to market twice a week and gets two dollars for every one of the hens, and he’s got 300 on his farm, and he takes care of them all and feeds them. Thatic a clear profit of $1.00 each on the 300 with their productions. Mr. Wyman: Ihave herea piece I would like you to hear. AN AVERAGE OF 247 EGGS PER HEN. “The average of 235 eggs per hen was made in our money-in-poultry contest by L. E. Dimock of Tolland County, Conn., with 100 hens of five breeds. There were 20 of each breed and an average egg record as fal- lows: Rose Comb White Leghorns, 247; Single Comb Brown Leghorns, 241; Single Comb White Leghorns, 240; Buff Wyandcttes, 226; Barred Plymouth Rocks, 221. Mr. Dimock obtained the highest record of the 500 contestants. It is also the best average from a large flock we have ever seen pub- lished. The 100 hens entered were latched in March, 1899, and marketed ILLINOIS STATE DAJRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 77 in October, 1899, being replaced at this! time by 100 pullets hatched in March 1900. Thus the system for constant flow of eggs 365 days in the year is by hatching the stock in March an marketing them in the fall of the following year, replacing them by the early hatched pullets. In this he gets a constant flow of eggs duzirg the molting period when eggs bring a high price. | In feeding for egg production he gives early in the morning a warm mash made of equal parts corn, oats and wheat ground together. 'Tosuf- ficient quantity of this is added 5 oz. Pratt’s hen food for 100 hens. The mash is mixed with hot water and as dry as possible. Don’t overfeed. At 10 a. m. scatter a little cracked corn in the litter to keep the hens scratching. The noon feed (12 m.) is oats soaked in hot water. At 3 p. m. scatter cracked corn in the leaves. At 5 p. m. in winter and 7 o’clock in summer give some oats and cracked corn. Steamed cut clover rowen is fed each day and boiled potatoes once in three days. Shells are kept constantly before them. A little meat, and but a little, is fed three times a week. Fresh water is given twice a day and is warmed in winter. Each compartment of the hen house is 10x12 feet, with two for each flock of 20 hens. One isiused for scratching. A window in front of each compartment at the bottom set at an angle of 45 degrees gives the hens a warm place in the sun. A three-foot walk in the back runs the length of the house. Eges are gathered by opening trap doors. The roosts are three feet from the ground with drop boards underneath for catching the manure, which is cleaned off every morning. Thereisa yard 50x20 feet in front of each pen, set with fruit trees for shade, which is so much needed in Summer. Clean sand covers the ground, which makes it.dry at all times. The houses are built high, of cottage style, which Mr. Dimock con- siders much more healthly for fowls than low roofed houses. There are ventilators in each gable. The houses are double boarded with paper be- tween. There are board piatforms over the roosts from which cloth cur- 78 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. tains are dropped down in extremely cold weather to protect the Leg- horn hens from freezing their combs. No males are allowed with the lay- ing hens. Another flock is kept to raise the stock from and to do the hatching and rearing as the chicks are raised in the natural way. Mr. Dimock submits the following financial statement: Cost of feed etc., $94.34; labor (one hour per day) 54.75; 100 pullets $85.01; total $234.11; sold eggs $421.30; 100 hens $54.00; iv pounds manure $10.00; total $485.- 30, which gives a profit of $251.19, or an average of $2.51 per hen. Be- low is given the monthly egg record of each pen to show how uniformly the laying has been. Barred §; ‘@: R. C. S. C. Buff Plymouth White White Brown Wyandotts. Rocks. Leghorns. Leghorns, Leg’s. PASE ise eens heh eT har aah eI 478 445 468 470 429 1.1 ty PA Ry ag OS Ca MA ga Apes yA nub 423 427 468 rt 449 TUMSi chee opin Cet ae URS ee 422 372 442 444 383 Wulivicete occ is eh toe ee eee 349 354 - 438 404 402 ANGERIBST = ooo oh bs are oh sre, boc aeons 343 373 394 383 385 Septem ber t.2:. 2.1 ewsetaaeees 262 ool 301 421 3844 GCtobert... «. cesar ae at toes 375 355 392 426 380 NOVENIDEI suse ee a 374 Sor 364 384 395 Pecewipe 3. ores eS Fear 478 345 - 392 360 414 SOUS | ioctl; ar Dee 301 350 377 341 386 PePLAry 4h hisses oe ce 292 326 3206 320 347 TV KE CC] i ea ane MEN Lage st. JA 342 413 393 522 507 Mebal: sie eI eee ‘4529 4498 4805 4932 4821 ATOMS. soe, ee Ree 226 201 240 247 241 I have also a little demonstration in regard to the amount of poul- try produced in the United States. This is the result) of a test that the “Orange Judd Farmer” had with 50C poultry raisers in the United States: “THE HEN AS MONEY MAKER.” The earning capacity of the American hen has never been carefully : determined. Like all other lines of business, farming and stock hus- 4 ILLINOIS STATE DALRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 79 bandry, the results are dependant largely upon individuality of the ani- mal and of the attention given by the owner. Long experience of farm- ers and poultry keepers hasshown that a flock of hens may be kept so as to give a return ranging from a considerable net loss on food consum- ed and labor, to a profit of as much as $5.00 per fowl. Yet under good average conditions, with fair fowls, suitable food and a reasonable amount of intelligent care, it ought not to be difficult to arrive at a basis which will show what a flock of hens are capable of earning. There were entered in our money-in-poultry contest, which closed April 1, 1901, over 500 contestants whe sentintheirreports. These came from every state and territory in the union. The flocks varied in size from 10 to 500 fowls. All manner and sizes of houses and yards were used and every condition presented which is likely to be found on this continent so that an average takec from the figures given will necessar- liy show what the American hencan and is doing, under average condi- tions, In computing these results we used the records of 365 poultry keepers who supplied all the figures called for in the record, the others being incomplete in some one or more details. The contest yearwas started witk 24,345 fowlsi and closed with 27,268, there being a gain during the year cf 2,923. As these represent almost entirely pullets hatched during the cpring, they effect the income only part of the time—that is, after they ieached maturity and began to lay, which we have assumed at eight months of age. Therefore we have added one-third of this increase to the original number and figured that _ 25,840 fowls were the number kept during the year. There was invested in these fowls, in the poultry houses, yards, fixtures, etc., the sum of $43,987.52, or an average investment of $1.81 per hen. Figuring that each hen is worth about 50 cents, there would be requred an investment of about $1.30 in the way of buildings, iand, etc., to keep her. During the year there was expended for food and supplies, which included grit, green done, condition powers, medicines and the like, $23,712.34 or 94c per hen. This is very close to the usual estimate of $1 per year as the cost of keep of a hen. , ‘ So ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. An accurate count was kept by each contestant of the amount of time expended in the care of poultry and a fair valuation was placed up- on this, which amounted to 34c per hen each year, or $23.96 per flock, there being an average of 69 fowls in each flock. During the year these hens laid an average of 82 eggs eacli. The best record was 247 eggs from a flock of 20 Rose Comb White Leghorns by a Connecticut poultry keeper, as published before. The smallest egg record was from another Con- necticut poultryman who obtained 485 eggs from 49 fowls, or about 10 eggs per hen per year. While this everage record may seem small, it must be born in mind the number of fowls given also includes the roos- ters which would make aslight difference in the average yield. The eggs sold for $1.15 per hen, showing a fair profit on eggs alone over cost of feed. A considerable portion of the income was derived from the sale of poultry, either young stock or the original fowls, which were turned and replaced by young stock raised uring the year. This amounted to $17,118.81 or 68c per hen. Making no estimate for stock raised, but charging the entire food cost to eggs, makes eggs cost $1.15 each for food consumed, but as nearly 1-3 of the food used was consum- ed by young stock, the net food cost per egg was about %c each. This must of course vary largely with locality, as food costs more than double . in some sections what it does in others. It can safely be assumed, how- ever, that the food cost of eggs is in the neighborhood of % their mar- ket value. The total receipts per fowl amounted to $1.95 each, leaving a profit of $1.01 over the cost of feed and 67 cents net over cost of food and labor. This gives a net income of $46.23 per flock anda gross income of $135.40. The gross income is actually much nearer the profit derived from the fowls in the contest than the net figures for nearly all the labor given was that employed at oddinter:.als, which would otherwise be of small value, while a good proportion of the food was that produced on the farms and gardens or refuse from the table which would otherwise go, to waste. As a basis for future figuring in the poultry industry, a cost. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Si of food of $1 per hen and a return over feed of $1 are pretty safe figures to tie to. These figures are briefly summarized as follows: INCOME AND PRODUCTION OF AN AVERAGE HEN. ET ns sais aw ols os Sabet mae oie Ww ea'steld OOD ale dome 82 Beemrter ra GOIN ANG USCd........cc0cce cccecdecuncce sccvevtcacccs $1.15 METAS ENV 50, > 5/5. 5 5. d2 a: iis. e bid.o.a avast de bbe wesc coldls. oevs's 68 A WN es Light as dO stop eta RT ee eased é/dlota-c wae sigan Leas Noe 2s een o's co's + ate 00 ce sta Odom ade de sepcapwuwen 94 a os ose oi oa noe eras SRE TelWele oldie 6 0 plant it, don’t plant down over two inches deep. Buff Jersey: I planted some this year and I think by next year they will come up all right. By the President: We will now adjourn and I hope to see youall here this afternoon and more too. FARM BUTTER MAKING W. R. HOSTETTER, MT. CARROLL, ILL. There is quite a difference between what farm buttermaking is, and what farm buttermaking oughtto be. I am informed by the leading groc- ers in my town that 25 per centof the dairy butter that comes to their: stores is all right and can besold to their best trade; that another 25 per cent can be sold, and that the balance, 50 per cent, is thrown into a box, and they generally lose money on it. It might be as useful to know l:ow the poorest, as well as the best grade of dairy butter is made, that we may know what to avoid as well as to know what to do. I think that lack of conveniences for making butter is one of the great- est causes for poor aairy butter. Another reason for poor dairy butter is, that the quantity is usually sosmall that a person cannot take the time necessary to properly care for it. Farm buttermaking should becreamery buttermaking on a smaller scale. Two essentials to fine butter-making are good drainage and sunshine where the dairy building is located. It is possible to make good butterin 100 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. a cellar, but it will take less work if your dairy room is above ground, where fresh air and sunshine can help you keep things fresh and sweet. There are few, if any, injurious microbes that the sun willnot destroy if 1t has an opportunity. The farm butter-maker should have a power of some kind. A tread power is very convenient, and gasoline or steam engines are not expensive. There is no doubt but what the farm separator has come to stay. The prices are now where almost every one making butter can afford to have it, The tinware used in the dairy should be carefully selected. Haveall the corners and crevices filled with solder. It is better to buy tinware of a firm who makes it especially for dairy use. I have some samples here that I would like to show you atte wards. Very often a milk pailis washed and turned upside down to drain. The water runs down and gathers around the wire in the rim of the pail and soon becomes foul. A very little tin and solder would prevent the water getting in. It would make the pail or strainer last twice as long, ani make one place less for injurious bacteria to grow. There are many littledetails in feeding and milking cows that may spoil the butter before the milk reaches the separator. When the milk reaches the separator, the dairymen’s work ends and the buttermaker’s commences. The main points in aseparator are, thoroughness of skimming, ease of care and simplicity of cleaning. As the cream comes fromthe separator it should run into a can stand- ing in cold water. The quick cooling prevents the growth of injurious bac- teria. As a ruleitis not practicable for the private dairyman to churn every day. The cream should be kept at a low and uniform tempert- ture until ready to cure or sour for for churning. Where the churining is done every day, Ithink it better to useastart- er. A good starter can be made by taking sour skim milk from sep- arator, cooling to 50 degrees, then warming it to 98 or 100 degrees and standing it in warm place, in covered can, for 24 hours. At that length of ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. IOI time itshould be sour and thick lobbered. A pint of this,is enough for 10 gallons of cream. If the starter should be very thick, I think it better to warm it to 90 or 100 degrees and use whey only. No fixed degree of temperature can be set for warming cream. Much depends upon the temperature of the dairy room in which it stands, and the vat that holds itand quantity of cream. I think a very good rule for separator cream is to cureata high temperature, and churn ata low one. In very cold weather,in my dairy room, it is necessary to warm the cream to 90 or 100 degrees twenty-four hours before churning. If a start- er is used, it will not be necessary to warm the cream to more than about 80 degrees. Theageofthecream will also makea difference. Cream 48 hours from the separator willsour sufficiently in 24 hours, at a lower tem- perature, than cream 12 or 24 hours. These little matters making the difference between a highand low flavored butter, can only be gained by experience and judgment. Aside from the matter of fresh cows, which gives the finest] flavored butter, the curing of the cream has the greatest effect on flavor. Of the two extremes, cream had better be under sour than over sour. I think much of the poor dairy butter in winter is caused by the cream becoming very cold and then allowed to stand in warm rooms. The warm air con- denses on top of cream with the odors it contains, and they are absorbed by the cream. Creamshould be kept covered, unless in a room well ven- tilated. Separator cream/'must be churned at a much lower temperature than cream raised from deep cans set in water, or from shallow pans. I think 55 about the right temperaturefor 25 per cent cream from Jersey cows. I have churned at 45to48 summer. Of course ice must be used to reach this temperature. Of the twoextremes, it is better to have cream too cold than too warm. Thechurnshould be stopped at the proper time to geta fineflavored butter. Ifyou churn it too much you will injure not only the flavor, but alsothe grain. Stop when it is nicely granulated. I have a sample kere thatis granulated just right. The butter rises readily to the top. Get the buttermilk all out. 102 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. I think a good plan when your churning reaches that stage, to put a little salt in your churn and turnit quickly a few times, then draw off'the buttermilk. Salt the butter at Jeast twice. At the second washing the water should run out clear. Here is asample of butter that is too fine. The cream was the right temperature when it went tothe churn, but the roon4wastoocold. The thermometer outside registered 15 below zero, and the cream got cold after it got to churning, and although the butter came in after it reached that stage, it would not gather any more and had to draw the water off when it was that fine, andthatisthe way you waste your butter. Here is another samplejof butter where the cream was too warm when it was churned, and the granulation is large. Butter when it comes in that shape, if you pour water on that and let it cool, when you go to work that butter those chunks being irregular in size, the salt will not get to the rest, ana when you cometocut it you will see white streaks that comes from the salt not being in those places that ere white. I have another sample here where half is granulated too fine and half the chunks too large. Those large chunks will leave white streaks in the butter. Here is another sample thatis very much too fine, and it is almost im- - possible to handle butter thatisas fine as this. If your butter comes in like that, and so cold you cannot gather it, the best way is to pour luke- warm water into your churn, enough to warm it, then it will gather. Here are somesamples that were churned at too high a temperature. if you have butter as it should be, properly worked, churned at the right temperature, it should break off like a piece of steel; able to takea roll and break it off. : As to selling the butter—you want to sell it to suit your customers. I had a customer that wanted to buy butter of me, and it was not salt enough to suit him. After | had made the second sale I asked how it was then, and was told it was pretty near it, but needed it just a little salter The next time I wastcldit wasall right. But it had been salted the same all the time. You can cultivate your customers’ tastes to suit your butter, ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 103 and after they get used to it, nobody else’s butter will suit. If you should try to salt to suit everybody you would never suit. The way. is to culti- vate their tastes to suit your butter. There is a good deal in putting up the butter; having it in a neat package. Most of the creamery men use paraffin paper. Itis a goow plan to take paraffin and put your butter up in packages in good shape. Most of the best butterissold in prints or in small packages. ‘The grocers who have the best trade nave praciically stopped cutting butter out of tubs; the majority ofthem want print ‘butter. Another thing, cuitivate the taste of your customers for fresh butter. I have a family who have bought butter of me for 15 years who want it packed in bulk, and this winter is the first rear they have boughtitevery week. They wanted grass butter in the fall and used to keepit till spring. Of course the butter would detericrate, and they couldn’t tell the differ- ence. It is better to cultivate the habit for fresh butter for your custom- ers. if you should havea batch of bad butter, the best thing to do is to make it inlo soap. . ! As to this tin business—there is the greatest difference in the world in tin. I[havesomesamples.here of tin and solder that I will show you. When you get solder, besure you get solder, not lead. By the President: This afternoon we have a long program, and @ good one, and we will try and commence promptly at 1:30 o’ciock. — Committee on Nominations: H. E. Hopkins of Kinkley. L. Johnson of Stillman Valley. F. A. Carr of Aurora, Illinois. Convertion adjourned until 1:30 p. m. 104 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Wednesday Afternoon, January 8, 1902 Convention called to order for the afternoon session. President in the chair. By the President: Mr. Schlappi, who gave us/ the talk yesterday afternoon on the test of the different breeds at the Pan-American Ex- position at Buffalo, is under the impression that some of you understood him to say that the amount of the profits he gave were for the year. That is not correct; they were for tke period he was testing there at Buffalo. We will now have a paper by Prof. Ertf. DIFFERENT METHODS OF CREAM SEPARATION. BY PROF. OSCAR ERF, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. . Gentlemen: Iam very glad to meetthedairymen of Illinois again, and I want to say, that I have a subject today which is a little bit censitive in cer- tain communities of the State. You know you are liable to tread on some- body’s bunions when you talk of cream separation. But I think that the Jairymen are perfectly familiar with the separation, so that I won’t have to hesittate in this community, at any rate, to talk on the subject. Of the many inquiries that we receive at the State University, per- taining to dairying, the most of them of recent years have been questions telating to the control and economy of cream separation. Since the in- troduction of the farm separator or cream gathering system in creameries, the problem often occurs to many dairymen whether it pays to purchase Ww. R. KIMZEY, TAMAROA, ILLINOIS. President Illinois Farmers’ Institute. >) “ae a OMe , ‘ Ane P] ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 105 expensive centrifugal machines when we have cheap gravity machines on the market .at the present day. The principle of cream separation is a simple one, when we do not take too many details into consideration, but it is certainly very confus- ing when we learn of the statements made by many of the would-be creaming machine promoters. At present there are four methods of creaming; the shallow pan, the deep-setting, dilution and centrifugal. It, no doubt, might be ixterest- ing as well as making it more coriprehensive to review the principles of creaming. Milk is composed of five constituents, namely:’ Water, milk, sugar, casein, fat and ash. We have here tie five constituents (shows samples) —the water and the casein, the fat and the ash, and this is the milk sugar. The fat is the highest when we put these four together and mix them in with water, we call them milk serum. All these tend to increase the specific gravity or the heft of the milk. The fat tends to lighten it. The creaming of milk is merely the concentration of fats. Cream contains all the constituents of milk, in approximately the same per cent except that the fat replaces the water to a certain extent. The composi- tion of cream is infiuenced by the method and condition of creaming and varies with wide limits. The per cent of fat may vary from 8 to 78 per cent. Ordinarily a mixture contairing less than 8 per cent of fatis known as milk, or more than 78 per cent, as butter. The fat in milk exists in minute globul2s suspended in the milk. The Size of the globules varies according to breed of cows, the period of lac- tation, the kind of feed and other factors. To illustrate their approxi- mate minuteness, we might state as an average estimate, that there are two million globules in a quart of miik, or, if these globules be laid side by side, 25 would equal the thickness of medium letter paper. The separa- tion of these globules in creaming may be effected in several different ways, but the general principle depends upon the difference in the spe- cific gravity of the fat globules and that of the water containing the 106 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. other milk constituents. Milk fat heing relatively lighter or lower in specific gravity than water increased by the other milk solids, would nat- urally rise, and anything which tends to increase the difference in spe- cific gravity aidscreaming. Milk containing large fat globules will cream more rapidly and completely than miik with small globules, because the volume of the globules compared .o surface is much greater than that of the small, thereby reducing the friction of the fat rising through the milk, and lessening the surface tension, both of which acts similarly to: that of an increase of specific gravity. The fat in the skim milk is made up very largely of small globules which fail to separate or raise @s soon as the others. For this feason, milk creams more thoroughly from cer- tain breeds of cows, or more likely from certain individual cows. The Jerseys and the Guernseys are generally considered to have the larger fat globules, therefore the cream rises more easily from Jersey or Guernsey milk. However, this is not always true. It depends entirely upon the individual cow. We have some Short Horns where the cream rises equally as well, and has equally as large fat globules. We hear of the iron-clad rule that the Jerseys have the largest, and the Holsteins the smallest, but it all depends upon the individual animal. The shallow aud the deep setting systems are familiar to all, and provably need no explanation as to the method of procedure. We take it for granted that at the present day every dairyman accepts the fact that the deep setting systein is far more efficient than the shallow setting system. and the efficiency is decidedly increased by a temperature of about 100 degrees to begin with in milk, and then suddenly immersed in ice water. This will naturally lower the temperature and make the water or the serum specifically heavier. Besides, the cooling of the outer layer of the milk will increase the density, causing it to fall and displace the warm milk, thereby creating a current which seems to greatly facilitate the separating of the cream in the deep setting system. The so-called dilution or hydraulic methcd of cream separation is comparatively an old process of raising cream. The process has fallen Oe ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 107 into disuse, but occasionally it appears as a new and improved method. This is largely due to the efforts of concerns which are selling a speciaily constructed can known as a hydraulic cream separator. These cans vary more or less in minor details, some of which have a somewhat ccempli- cated internal construction. which, however, does not appear to have affected the efficiency of the machine, but the principle is the same in each case. In the operation, the milk is diluted with an equal, or with a greater oulk of water and the mixture is allowed to stand from one-half to twelve hours, and is then skimmea by drawing off the skim milk. The supposition is, that by diluting the milk, the water being lighter than skim milk, and heavier than cream it would rise and take a_ position between the skim milk and the cream, and while assuming this place, it would thereby facilitate the rising of the fat globules. This, however, is not the case, for if water is added to milk it uniformly mixes with the skim milk and merely lesesns the specific gravity between the fat and the water by diluting the remaining constituents of the milk, which tends to lessen the diflerence. The advantages claimed fer this method are, small cost for the can, lessened labor, durability, and requires neither ice nor the storage of such. Sometimes it is mentioned that a cleaner cream is produced than by any other system, and if the machine is properly manufactured all the cream can be obtained. From the results obtained at the Illinois Experiment Station and others, we believe that the claims for the hydraulic separator can be equalled by the deep setting system, not taking the centrifugal system into consideration at all, and the thor- oughness of the separation will be far superior to any hydraulic separator if milk is set at a temperature below 40. To prove the correctness of this statement, I compiled the result of a series of experiments which have recently been carried on at cur station. For the shollow setting, we have an average of .84of1lper cent. of fat left in the skim milk. For the deep setting .62 per cent. end for the dilutionsystem .81 per cent.,. an approximate gain of 25 per cent. of fat with the deep setting system over the dilution system. These show the relative amcunt of fat left 108 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. in the skim milk. I meta gentleman from Kansas the other day and he said that they could not hardly use the hydraulic system down there. I asked him why, and he said they kadn’t got the water. It was so dry down there lastsummer they had to drive hoops on the pigs noses to keep them from eating the soil. It is evident that a large number of these hydraulic separators are still being sold at price far above their actual worth, on the pretex that they have all the advantages as heretofore stated. This is appar- ently a part of the dairy business which is infected with dry rot, and it is our purpose to doallthat we can for its distruction, and especially since cur modern centrifugal separators are soefficient. There remains no reason to believe that the centrifugal method does not pay better in every case than the dilution system. The profitableness is not only due to the fact that a larger per cent. of fat is recovered from the skim milk, but also that the feeding value of the skim milk is far superior to that of the dilution system. Another phase of cream separation which needs to be considered is occasionally brought up and aprarently agitated in favor of the dilution " system, and that is the question of bow to obtain a uniform per cent. of fat in cream from day to day with the centrifugal system. The varia- tions in the test of the hand separaicr cream is no doubt very great, and on an average is probably moreuniform than with the dilution system, but if users of hand separators are careful in operating their machines uniformly, this difficulty may beavoided. There are several things that influence the test of cream of hand separators. The first and probably one of the most important causes of the variation of the richness of cream is the speed of the bowl. Anything that tends to change the~ speed from one separation to another must necessarily influence the test of the cream by its irregularity. Second, the temperature of the milk has considerableinfluenceon tLe richness of the cream. A dilfer- ence of 8 or more degrees during the time of separation will cause a de- cided. If milk is warm,thecream wiil be thicker; if cold, it will be ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 109 thinner, other conditions being equal. Third, the per cent. of fat changes with the amount separated per hour. Milk should be run through the sep- arator at a constant stream. If mnilk is fed at an uneven rate, or the flow of milk is stopped, the thickness of the cream will be vastly in- fluenced. Fourth, the amourt of water or skim milk used to flush out the bowl will naturally tend to aifect the cream test. It is always well to use a uniform quantity. And lastly, there is a ceram screw, in the sep- ator bowl, for the purpose of changing the thickness of the cream when de- sider. By this it can be so reguinied as to make thin or thick cream, and when once set, if all the other conditions of the separation are kept uniform, it will produce nearly a constant per cent. of cream. These principles hold true in all centrifugal separation, and if such precau- tions are taken, a cream quite uniform in test can be depended upon; at any rate, far more uniform than can be obtained from the dilution sys- tem. The idea of this paper is princ:nally to discourage the use of the dilu- tion system. I hope that some cay that it will be eradicated from the state. It is an ineffectual way of separating cream. But there are many people today in the business who are attempting to sell these sep- ators throughout the state. We occasionally hear of the large numbers being sold in a certain county for sums vastly greater than they ought to be sold at. When I hear ofit, I feel like saying, like the boy said when his father had served him wiik three or four servings and asked him if he cared for a fifth he answered, “‘No, not another darned bit,” and I hope the time will come when we can say that to the dilution cream separator in Illinois. DISCUSSION. Q.— What about the calves and pigs where using the dilution separa- tor? A—1I am afraid they would have to live on pretty poor material. 110 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION, eee Q.—Have you the differences ii; per cent. between the Separator sys- tems and the hydraulic? | A.—Yes. The the average of our calculations are 84 per cent for the shallow Setting; .81 per cent. for the hydraulic; .62 per cent for the deep setting. Of course the separator System varies anywhere from .02 to 1-10. This is taken on the basis of .02 of 1 per cent. Q.—I would like to ask if these tests were all made at the Univer- ‘sity? ; A.—Yes sir Q.—Did you use different makes of machines? A.—We just have one machine, but the rest are practically on the ‘Same basis. I have tried several of them. But this experiment was run on one machine only. : Q.—I would like to ask where we are most likely to loge cream. Have a small separator? A.—Most likely to loge cream with slow Speed; irregularity OF turns % ing a small Separator. You know q person gets tired and naturally turns slower, and one revolution minakes a vast difference at the bowl. It is quite essentia] that we stir at a uniform speed on a hand separator. ‘I think it is necessary almost to fave something else besides a hand Power to turn a hand Separator. Q.—Havn’t you found that a man will usually pull down and not pull up so much? A.—Yes sir, Q.—If you have a fly whee] it won’t make SO much difference? A.—Yes sir that is the custolnary way of turning a hand Separator especially when a person gets tired he drops on the handle and when it is coming up again it is pretty cara work to pull, and he don’t pull so _hard. Q.—What power would you recommend for a farm Separator? A.—Why I like the gasoline power engine, or a sas engine. But “Where you have a boiler which you really need in a dairy, why a steam ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Lit engine will do just as well. The advantage of a gasoline engine, you can stop it or start it almost any time when ready for milk, and in case of a steam boiler we have to wait. And then if you have a small boiler you don’t necessarily have to heat your water up so high as if runing with power. A gasoline engine has a little the advantage over the steam engine for cream separation. Q.—I think I have heard complaint about gasoline engines giving uniform speed? A.—No sir. That depends on the gasoline enginesomewhat. What we call the one cycle engine isvery ununiform speed, but the modern size, the two cycle engine gives a regular speed, and are used often for lighting plants which requires asteady kind of speed. Quite a number of gasoline engines operate electric light plants; that is the most sen- Sative apparatus that we can get, requiring the least variation. Q.—Why would it not be a good plan, in the use of a farm separa- tor by hand, to have some sort of a time-keeper, a pendulum, or rather a cyclometer; why wouldn’t that be a good idea? A.—I should think some of you would have t~ouble in persuading the man to keep an eye to the pendulum all the time. Q.—It would not be necessary to keep an eye all the time, an ear would do it? A.—Yes sir. There is a little scheme invented especially for large machines, by which they had a litile governor on the spindle, and this zovernor would open by anincrease of speed and would strike a little bell if opened a certain distance; and then it would come back again the opposite way and open up and strike another bell which would indicate a slow speed. But the trouble is with this high speed, and on such a small circumferance, to keep that governor in shape. It will indicate speed sometimes twice before the bell rings, and for that reason it really is not successful. There is aneed of an apparatus to determine the speed of a separator bowl on both kinds of separators, that is if the in- vention can be made simple enough and accurate enough. 112 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Q.—How would tread powercdc’? There area large number of dairy— men who don’t feel as though they could afford to buy any machine, gasoline engine or other powers than the tread power, small tread power. I knowa great many who use that. Some have a large dog to do this work. The best idea of all is, use a bull on the tread power. | A.—yYes, the tread power isa a very good machine, if you get the right kind of an’animal. It all depends on the bull or other animal you get in there. The trouble is in starting out. You have got to teach this animal, and the first thing he will do, will be to jump and land on the other side of the tread power, and considerable difficulty in getting such an animal trained, but a bull is really the steadiest power.. I have never had any experience with a dog. It may be a dog may be more regular, but I have never had any experience; sheep are not. very regular. The proper way to overcome all this is with a large balance wheel. I have seen this worked successfully. Build the tread power to a large balance wheel and the belt irom the balance wheel to the separa-- tor. The governor on the separator will tend to check the speed when it comes over a certain point, and the balance wheel will tend to keep: it in motion when it falls below. But an animal can be used if it is not. too lazy. Sometimes they lean back and then come forward gradually; they do it so nicely you don’t realize it at all. It isa pretty hard matter to govern it. I know it has been successful in some localities or in some barns where they have the animal nicely trained. Q.—Just a word on tread power. I can’t see how an animal can shirk, unless he has some way of stopping himself; from getting off be- hind. He can’t run it faster or slower, and if governed by a governor on the fly wheel or balance wheel of the tread power, because when it runs above a certain place it locks itself? A.—That’s true, the tread power is a gravity machine. If you can keep that bull on the gravity all the time, but you can’t keep them on that incline. If he is a new animal he is apt to come down, unless you have a bar back of him; andifyouhave a bar he will rest on that bar a little ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 113 bit, and I wonder if it doesn’t make a little difference; just makes his feet go. He will just stop the machine, and he is propping it up instead of let- ting it run. Q.—I wonder if a rowofspikes round the animai might Keep even power? Laughter. A Member.—I have used atread power for 15 years, and we have al- Ways used horses and have had grand success. A belt from the tread power to shaft and a heavy whee] on the shaft, and I believe I get as steady power as any engine can p'roduce. I must say I undertook to try bulls, andit took oneman with an ox goad, and I decided I would rather pay for shoeing horses. A Member.—We use steam power because we are too poor to buy tread power. Can get a 15-horse power horizontal tubular boiler and a 10-horse horizontal engine for $75.00, and tread power of even two horses would cost $150.00, and so we got the steam plant and have the exact speed at all times. | Q.—Have used tread powerand cf course in breaking in a new animal you have a little trouble, but take a bull on the separator,when he gets used toit, he rather enjoys the work. Put him on the churn and he will hang back, but he will run the separator a reasonable length of time. Prof. Erf.—It is as I say, that depends entirely on the animal. By the president.—While at dinner the Stover Manufacturing Com- pany sent an invitation to us, which I will read: Freeport, Ill., Jan. 8, 1902. J. W. Newman, Esq. President of the Illinois Dairymen’s Association, Freeport, III. Dear Sir:— We desire to extend tothe members of your Association, through you, a cordial invitation to visit ana inspect our factories, both the old 1I4 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. and the new—the former in full working operation, the latter about ‘completed and in readiness for occupation. ‘ If you will kindly inform us when we may expect a visit from your members, we will have an officer of the company in attendance. Yours truly, The StoverManutacturing Co., D. C. Stover, Pres. We have no cpen session toMcrrow morning, to allow the members ‘to inspect the butter room and Machinery hall. 1 think between ten and eleven o’clock tomorrow morning would be very convenient to visit ‘the Stover Manutacturing Company's plant, and there will be some one ‘there to show you through. I am sure we thank them for their very t cordial invitation. CREAMERY BUTTERMAKERS AS SEEN BY THE TRAVELING SALESMAN BY F. A. LEIGHTON, NEW HAMPTON, IOWA. Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Illinois State Dairy Associa- tion: It was with a great dealoftimidity that I consented to read a paper at this: convention. The State of Illinois, and especially this Elgin district, is so far advanced in dairying that it would be presumptuous for a resi- dent of Iowa to come here and attempt to tell you how to improve your butter, and for that reason I shail not be able to give you any points which will enable you to make better butter than you are making at present. However, Iam of the opinion that not all of the Illinois cream- eries or Illinois buttermakers are as good as they could be made, and as my subject is butter making from a travelingman’s standpoint, I shall ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. FES have to take the creameries and buttermakers west of the Mississippi river as a basis on which to make my observations, for none of the IIli- nois creameries have ever come under my travels. There is a great deal cf sanieness about this big world, travel where you will, and there is a great deal of sameness in dairy metthods, beitin the Elgin district, or on the praries of Iowa and other Western States. Your buttermakers have their weak and strong points as well as those of other states. It may be possible that the butter makers or Illinois have more latent energy than those of other states, for every once in a while they wake up and makeatub of butter that sweeps everything before it. It has been said that the buttermakers of the Elgin district are rest- ing on their laurels, or rather living on the reputation that they made years ago. This, perhaps,is nottrue. It might have been the case a few years ago, but since the dairy business has taken such vast strides in the west, and Iowa and Minnesota butter has made a reputation for itself, the people who own and operate the creameries of Illinois realize that the states west of them are no mean conipetitors. One large creamery operatorin this district informed me that the buttermakers of this district are taking a greater interest in dairy mat- ters than they did a few vears ago. lgin butter has an enviable reputa- tiou everywhere that butter is made, and I believe that this reputation has been well earned. I donot believe you have any better buttermak- ers than we have, but I dothink you have better patrons, or, in ther words, you have educated your patrons to produce better milk than they do further west, but as the western dairymen are directing all their en- *rgy in the direction of getting better milk, we are in hopes that before long Iowa milk will equal Elgin milk, and when that time comes, we give you warning that you will have to watch that special “Elgin Brand” or it will be lost in the shuffle. It is not my intention to criticise the Illinois buttermakers; they are beyond criticism from me. Thebest buttermakers in Iowa originally 116 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. came from Elgin—that is, they tell me they came from Elgin, but I sup- pose that means the Elgin district. I do not just exactly know what territory composes the Elgin district, but I should judge that it extended away over into Iowa, as I often see Iowa butter branded “Elgin,” but I can state that this practice is being done away with to some extent, and in time, possibly, we will not have to use your brand in order to sell our goods. The State of Minnesota is talking of having their own Minnesota brand. We have not quite gottothat yet over in Iowa; there are many improvements to be made in our buttermaking methods before we can adopt an Iowa brand. We must get to a point where an Elgin butter- maker can not come to our conventions and carry away the sweepstakes. The traveling man, who hashad experience as a buttermaker, ané who is familiar with creamery machinery and all up-to-date methods, has a good chance to observe and note right and wrong methods used by the buttermakers with whom he comes in contact. One of the most noticeable things which comes under his eye is the general appearance of the interior of the creamery. Do you know if there is any place in the wide world that should be free from reproach, it is the factory where the butter is made. It is the most delicate and wholesome article of food on the market, and no other article of food needs the constant care to keep it up to its standard as does butter. I am not of the opinion that it takes as much skill to make a pound of flgur as it does to make a pound of butter; neither do I know of any other article of food that a little neglect in its manufacture would cause it to deteriorate so fast. The interior of a flour mill if not perfectly clean would not, perhaps, injure the quality of the flour; at any rate the con- sumer would probably never know the difference, but with butter it is different. The consumer is being educated to tell whether the milk and cream was perfectly clean from which their butter was made, and when any impurities get into the milk, no known method will eliminate them, they will remain until the butter is consumed. So for this reason it ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 117 takes more care and skill to make butier than any other article of food that I know of, and every thing must be perfect in the creamery. My observation shows me that there are some buttermakers who expect toe much from patrons; to. much, for the reason that they do not set them a good example. Tnere is no better example, and no better way to educate patrons than to have your factory in such a condition that when they come into it they will stand in admiration of its purity and neatness. And then the traveling man likes to see a nice, well kept fac- tory, and when they go to one they go away and talk about it. The but- termaker who does not visit other factories and has no chance to com- pare his factory with others, does not perhaps realize the great differ- ence there is in the condition of these factories. Now wenoticetheround corners in the factory; we used to make them when as boys we did the fall plowing, and had to go over them again. We notice the oil on the en- gine and separators; the bunch of waste in the corner; the rubbish in the engine room, and the pieces of belt and other articles on the window sill. These are very little things, but they count largely in the appear- ance of the factory. Again, we notice the appearance of the buttermaker. It is not necessary that the buttermaker wear a white collar and cuffs while at work in the factory, but it is essential that his clothing is clean. Let me give you an illustration of what I mean: One time a large creamery company wanted aforeman, and their manager was sent to another county to hire a buttermaker who had quite a good reputation, but unfortunately that buttermaker’s appearance, in the matter of clean- liness of his wearing apparel, disgusted the manager, and he came away without making himanoffer. The buttermaker was out six hundred dol- lars, as that was the difference between the salary he was getting and that he would have been oflered. Six hundred dollars would have done a lot of washing. Buttermaking is not just being able to make a fancy article of but- ter: there are hundreds of buttermakers ont, of a job who can make xe ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. fancy butter. One of the most essential things is knowing how to get along with people with whom you have to deal, and this is the hardest thing for us all to learn. That buttermaker who has the faculty of smoothing the ruffled feelings ofa patron or a patron’s wife, and sending them on their road rejoicing is a jewel; and yet thereare plenty cf these buttermakers. This is what is called tact, and tact commands a bigger salary than anything else in business. Business men are always looking for men of tact, and inno placeis it more essential than in creamery buttermaking. Out in California, they callthe creamery buttermakers “Creamery Operators,’ and I like this name, for a man may be the best of butter- makers and still not be asuccessful creamery operator. They used to tell us that a buttermaker should have a musical ear so he could tell when the separators were at the right speed. These fellows, however, have gone the way of those who guessed at the right amount of salt, and those who color their cream by pouring the color out of the can until they think they have enough; those who guess at the acidity of the cream; the richness of the cream; the amount of fat lost in the skim milk; those who can not tell within a ton of how much coal they burn in a week— those are the fellows who are “gvuing away back and sitting down,” and the fellows who are taking their places are the ones who weigh the salt, who measure the color, whotest the cream for acid and butter fat, who know exactly what kind of work the separators are doing each day, and who also irae what it costs to make a pound of butter in his factory; these are the buttermakers who are not looking for jobs; there » is always one waiting for them. In our travels among the creameries we find buttermakers who say, “Well, those butter exhibits may be all right, but I don’t take any stock in them.” Another one says, “I don’t believe starters will help to pro- duce better butter.’”’ Another does not read the dairy papers hecause some one writes something that he dees not believe. These fellows will perhaps flourish for a while, but mark my word, there will be a time ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 11g when these buttermakers will have tc leave the business simply for the reason that. better educated men will step into their places; it has hap- pened every week, you know of cases as well as I do. The creamery business is taking great strides; changes are coming fast; what’ will: be: the methods: five vears hence, we know not. It may be that the large syndicates and firms will control the creamery business- Perhaps they will be able to make butter cheaper than the small cream- ery companies, and if so, the little fellows will have to quit the business, for the milk producer will sell his milk to the creamery who pays the highest price. Or again, the farmers may get the co-operative fever and drive the big concerns off the face cf the earth. They did that once, and whether history will repeat itself we know not, but whatever change comes, one thing will remain the same, if the big firms make the butter they will want the best skilled labor they can get, for their butter must be fancy; if the co-operative creamery is to remain, then they must have the best talent. So in face of these facts, it remains for the buttermaker to be prepared to fill any. position in his line of work, so that he may be ready for any change that may come. We believe the wages of butterinakers will never be any lower thar now. In fact there is a tendency toward better wages and better butter- makers. This is especially true in the State of Minnesota—that state which is setting such a fast pace for other states. We must keep an eye on Minnesota, or they will distance us and we will be left at the pole. Did you ever stop andthink why Minnesota is making such rapid strides? It is because every person who lives there, from the governor down, takes an interest in creamery buttermaking. They talk about the quality of Minnesota butter at home and away from home, and they are convincing some people that there is merit in Minnesota butter. OF course, we, who live-in other states, know better, but I want to whisper to you that Minnesota buttermakers will bear watching, for they are out for blood and they are determined to put their state at the head, and I guess. they will succeed if Illinois and Iowa do not wake up and heag@ them off. 120 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. It is the buttermaker of the future that we must think of today, not those of the past. If you are to stay in the business, then be the best buttermaker in your state. Don’t consent to be the second best. There is only one way, and thatisto meet every new buttermaking problem and be ready to solve it when it comes. Make yourself valuable to your employers so that they can not get aiong without you, and when this is accomplished you will be successful. Song by Mr. Bagley. Encorea. By the President: ‘We expected to have Prof. G. L. McKay, who is at the head of buttermakers, with us today, to give usa talk on “Starters in Buttermaking,”’ but he is unabie td be present and your worthy Secre- tary, Mr. Caven, will read his paper. STARTERS IN BUTTERMAKING BY PROF. G. L. McKAY, AMES DAIRY SCHOOL, IOWA. (Paper read by Secretary.) That Prof. McKay expected to be present is proved by the first sen- tence of his paper, which reads: ‘I am pleased to be here at the meet- ing of the Illinois Association.” The interchange of ideas and some- times the interchange of prizes do good. We get a chance to find out a what the other fellows are doing. {I am decidedly in favor of interstate contests. As we allsell on the same markets, it is just and right that we should come tog2ther in competition. The time is coming when all but- ter will be sold on its merits. I think if butter was sold in this country the same as it is in England, we would see a variation in prices of sev- eral cents per pound. Whenever this time comes we will find many thanges in our creameries; good buitermakers will be ata premium and the poor ones will be forced to the wall. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. I2I I spent eight days iast winter at the National Convention at St. Paul, examining butter with judges. I must say I never saw a greater variation in quality than was displayed at that meeting. If prices were paid for this butter according to quality, there would certainly be a variation of from five to six cents: per pound. What is the meaning of this wide range in quality? It cannot be the feed, as most all cows in the western states have very much the same kind of food. Tke difference cannot be due to the period of lactation, as | most all our creamerymen have many fresh cows. If the trouble is not due to the cow, nor the food consumed by the cow, we must look elsewhere for it and try to find a solution for the same. It is true that some foods have a decided effect on the flavor, such as wild onions, cabbage and tur- nips. These foods seem to be largely charged with volatile acids and when they are fed, pasteurization of the cream will largely remove the obnoxious flavors. We have two periodsin the year when the makers have trouble in producing fine flavored butter. In the winter months the buyers com- plain of winter flavor, and during the dry period in the summer they complain of summer conditions. Now I believe it is possible tc make fine butter during either period, or to make good butter the year arcund. In the month of June, when nature has covered the earth with loveli- ness, the right kind of fermentation seems to be everywhere. Most any- one can make fine flavored butter at this time; but when the kind of bacteria that we have to deal with changes to the undesirable kind, it will then require skill. At our sckool, our bacteriologist made a number of tests to determine the kind of bacteria that milk contains during the different months of the year. In March, wher it is quite difficult to make fine butter, one hundred samples from different patrons’ milk were taken. Only 12% per. cent showed pure acid flavor; 48 per cent impure acid flavor, and 391% percent Rapid decomposition of the curd. Samples taken April 8th. showed 50 ver 122 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. cent pure acid flavor; 27.7 impure acid flavor, and 22.3 rapid decomposi- tion of the curd. In April we found a decided improvement in the kind of bacteria present. Samples taken on May 10 showed 90 per cent pure acid flavor and 10 percentimpure. This largely explains why it is easy to get good flavors at some times cf the year and not at other times. Samples taken in June and July skowed about the same results as in May. Now if we could get our patron te exercise more care in regard to cleanliness, a lot of this troublemight be obviated. Still, at certain periods, makers will have tocombat undesirable fermentation. In winter months when cows are milked in the stable, most of the germs that get in the milk are of an undesirable kind, or what might be termed putrefactive bacteria. These germs are found in the manure and come mostly from the intestines. Particularly do they abound in warm, unventilated barns; so great care should be taken by the patron to have their udders wel! cleansed before the milk is drawn, and to have the milk removed from tke stable as quickly as possible. | In the summer months, during a dry period, frequent complaints are heard from butter dealers of what they term summer conditions or weedy flavors. These flavors are undoubtedly caused by a species of bacteria. As many of you no doubt have observed that the next morn- ing after a good heavy rain, your fiavor will change and improve. Many attribute this to the fresh grass, but fresh grass does not grow ina night. Our bacteriologist found by experimenting with a species of bacteria, that he could produce this same weedy flavor. I do not like to use the term “‘starcver’ during the winter period, nor during the dry period in the summer. I would sooner use the term “con- troller,’ as I would use heavy enough starter to control the flavor. The lactic acid bacteria seems to be a very important factor in cream ripen- ing. When traveling through Eurcpe I found that acid cultures were uni- versally used for ripening cream. This is not to be wondered at when we examine the kind of bacteria that well ripened cream of a good quality ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 123. contains. We find that good cream contains 90 to 95 per cent of lactic acid bacteria. To illustrate more thoroughly the effect of a good starter, I wili quote, if you will pardon me, some work done at the Iowa Dairy School.. at the meeting of the National Dairy Association held at Topeka, Kan- sas, one of our students, Mr. Mortensen, scored the highest on flavoring, 48% out of a possible 50 points. The following year Mr. Evans, from our school, was tied for second place at the Sioux Falls meeting. At Lin- coln meeting, Mr. Mortensen again was second, and last year our man. Webster scored one point the highest. Here we find that butter made at our school secured the highest twice in four consecutive scorings and occupied second place at the other two scorings. Do you suppose we could make that kind of a record showing butter in the summer months? I would without any hesitation say, No. Our succ2ss was: brought about by using heavy enough starters to control the ripening, and thus overcome the effect of the stable fermentation. As I said be- fore, at certain periods of the year you should use enough starter to con- trol the favor. The best way to do this is to use 20 to 25 percent starter, and put this in your cream vat with a few good, cans of, milk before you begin to separate. Then skim a good heavy cream so that you will have a 25 or 30 per cent cream when you are through separating; that is. starter and all. If you ripen this until the cream begins to thicken and. then cool you will invariably have fine flavored butter. Iam athorough believer in the use of acid tests for cream ripening, but where a maker has no acid test, I would advise ccoling cream as soon as it begins to thicken. One great drawback to starters, in many cases, is the work of preparing them and carrying them forward in a practical manner. It is true that we have many good starter cans on the market. Some: of our makers, however, demand a more practical method. I find for the everyday maker that, a tank 3 to 3% feet wide and 6 feet long and 1& inches deep, or big enough to ho!d a number of starter cans desired, con- structed of 14% inch lumber, witk steam and cold water connections. 124 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. serves the purpose well. With this you need some cooling cans, or cans constructed by a tinner on the same principle. By placing these cans of skim milk in a tank of hot water you can soon pasteurize them. It is not necessary to stir the milk all the time while it is heating. Turning the cans around occasionally will be sufficient. A little cooked taste will dono particular harm. There should be a number of strings or wires put over the tank and fastened to the ceiling, having hooks on the ends to fasten in handles of cans so as to prevent them from tipping over in the water. It is better to heat the skim milk to 180 or 209 degrees and keep it at chis temperature for 15 to 20 minutes. The hot water should then be re- moved and cold water run around the cans. This will quickly cool the milk down to a temperature of 75 to 80 degrees, when it is ready to be inoculated with 2 percentotthe mother starter. In this manner two or three starters can be carried on With very little trouble. We get the best results when preparing a new starter from pure culture, to start it with about a quart of pasteurized milk. When it begins to coagulate or has Wn acidity of about 35 to 40 degrees, Mann’s test, or from .5 to .7 of one per cent by Farrington’s test, itis in the best condition for adding to a Jarge starter. lf a starter is carried too far the excretion thrown off by the bac- teria destroys them. There are mere bacteria present at the degrees I mentioned than at any other period. One advantage in using atank for holding the starter cans, is that you can quickly cool your starters down as soon as they begin to coagu- late, by adding crushed ice to the water in the tank. Starters cannot only be cooled, but they can be kept at a low temperature with very lit- tle trouble in the tank. The covers on the Cooley cans prevent any im- pureties from falling into the milk. It is just as necessary to carefully observe the ripening of the starter as it is the ripening of the cream. With good can, a _ starter ghould be carried forward for atleast a month. The old saying that “As ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 125 you sow, so shall you reap,” comes true in buttermaking, as in any other place. If we use over ripe starters, we will certainly get an undesirable flavor in our cream. The Danes claim to carry the same starter for morethana year with- out changing. The average maker ay get better results with a commer- cial starter during the winter months; however, with little care, good natural starters can be secured. The system that has been mentioned so frequently through the press is a good one. Take a number of samples of best milk in sterilized glass fruit jars, and keep them at atemperature of 70 degrees until they coagulate. When you find a sample that has coagulated solid, without any pin holes, and has a pleasant acid taste, you may know you have the right kind of fermentation present to give the desirable flavor. This can be used to inoculate the large quantity of milk to be used asa starter forthe cream. After a starter ofthis kind has been carried forward a few times, it virtually becomes a pure culture. In the near future, starters will undoubtedly be as commonly used for buttermaking as yeast is for bread making. The proper grading of but- ter and selling according to quality, will put the butter business on a much higher plane. Buttermaking in a modern creamery is a very pleasant occupation. The separation of cream with a modern centrifugal separator, the use of pure cultures to control the flavor, the acid tests to determine the acidity of the cream, the combined churn and worker for working the butter, and the ammonia machine for refrigerating purposes, demand the highb- est kind of skill. To the young man who has mastered all these, there is a bright future in dairying. To bea good creameryman, the first demand is cleanliness. Without this a maker might as well drop the dairy business. I like to see a maker who has nerve enough to stand up for hisrights and reject milk that will not make the best quality of butter. A patron who constantly sends poor milk needs arousing in a vigorous way. Smooth words fail to have any effect upon him. 126 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Two of the highest salaried and most successful men we have in Iowa are termed “cranks” by many of their patrons; but their butter sells for one cent above, and we can stand a little crankiness ina man who produces first class goods and especially when his butter sells for one cent above. ; All theories and rules laid down at dairy schools and conventions are just so much raw material furnished for makers to work with, and unless a maker can apply these, they are of no benefit to him. SOME LESSONS FROM PAN-AMERICAN DAIRY TEST DE WITT GOODRICH, FT. ATKINSON, WIS. - Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen:— The first act of this drama seems to be paper hanging. (Hangs chart.) It is possible that my paper will overlap the paper you heard yesterday. Not being present at that time, I cannot tell whether it will or not, but there may be some of the facts that were not touched upon. The Pan-American dairy: test extended over the whole six months of the Exposition. It included the testing of each one of the fifty cows, representing ten different breeds, both for butter fat and for total milk solids, as well as the weighing and charging of every item of feed consum- ed by each animal. In addition to all of this, one day’s milk from each herd of five cows was separated and churned by ‘itseif each week. Every cow was weighed into the test May 1st and out of it October last, and the gain in weight of each herd credited at 3 cents per pound. This work required the employment of about twenty experts and assisstants, with the superintendent, at a total expenditure in salaries Of $7,320.00. The cost of the test to the exposition company for feeds, ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 127 ice, etc., amounted to $4,700.00, making a total cost of over $12,000.00, which was, however, to a great extent, offset by the sale of products. An advisory committee composed of Major Henry E. Alvord, Hon. _E. W. Hobson of Canada, Dr. W. H. Jordan and J. H. Grisdal (the two last named representing the Associations of America and Dominion Ex- periment Stations), together with a representative of each breed for- mulate the rules which governed the test. They provided for the awarding of four prizes to the herds of five cows excelling in the following points of merit: d ist.—Greatest net profit on estimated butter at 25c per lb., 85 lbs. fat in milk, representing 100 lbs. of butter. 2nd.—Greatest net profit on churned butter at 25c per lb. 3rd.—Greatest net profit on tctai milk solids at 9c per lb. 4th.— Greatest net profit on tctal milk solids at 9c per lb., plus gain gain in live weight at 3c per lb. This joint committee also established prices at which the various feeds should be charged to the cows, this being estimated from a review of the prices of the several feeds throughout the United States and Can- ada for the last five years. They were as follows: Corn silage $2.00 per ton; green feed $1.75; clover hay $7.00; bran $15.00; ground oats $19.00; cornmeal and gluten feed each $16.00; and oilmeal, cottonseed meal and pea meal each $25.00. The carrying out of a test of this kind, extending as it did through about two-thirds of a period of lactation, and embracing so many breeds of cattle, could not help but teach many valuable lessons, or to more firmly impress some previously learned. The agricultural press during the last four months of this test kept the reading farmer pretty well posted as to its progress, and since its completion, has given out not only the gereral results freely, but las abounded in speculations and de“iuctions from the results, variously colored according to the view point, previous conviction or prejudice of the writers. ; / 128 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Since five of the herds were from Canada and five from the United States, something of the spirit of international contest added to the in- terest of the work. Considering that three of the four recognized dairy breeds were represented by Canada, namely: the Holsteins, Jerseys and Ayrshires, it would not have been strange if three, or even all four of the prizes had been carried off by our industrious neighbors on the north, but, thanks to the excellence of our Guernsey herd and ability of their herdsmen, the two prizes for butter production came our way. In the brief time at my dispcsa!, I shall try to call attention toa few of the lessons taught by this work as they appeal to me. As the standing of the several herds has been so recently reported in all of the papers, I will not dwell on that, but will call attention simp- ly to the chart showing net profit in each of the two principal phases in the test. CHART 1. Net profit six (6) months. In butter fat. “Total solids 7 leading breeds. 7 leading breeds. Guernsey NT. io. ee bee heehee 234 Holsteins ........s0c0se5 en 262 JETSEYVE!s Hiacan kee G hi's dela oe 225. Ayrshires .....s.+5 seu eee 236 AV PSRINES Kc eS tana hes Re eee 218 Brown Swiss’ ..;::...ssheeaee 02 0208 FLOISUOINS joo 3s bs hare es et eee 211 . Short Horns .......:+. sue eae 206 Reds owed |, 2A we eee ee ee 198 GuernseyS «......&.005 shane 203 Brown WSWisss.% cease eae ne 188 Red -Polled ....... cones eee 202 Krench Canadian, 2s vo. sec 176 JeTSCYS: °. 0.05 cele s o's es shi ee 202 One point which seems to me worthy of special mention is the meth- od employed in the dairy barn at Buffalo to advise visitors and inquir- ing students of the performance and standing of each animal at any time during the test. ; For the benefit of those present who were not privileged to see this exhibit at Buffalo, I have made a chart representing the bulletin board suspended above each cow, on which was kept her record. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 129 CHART II. Mary Mershall. Born April, 1891. Last calf April 15, 1901. RECORD. RECORD. Week ending Oct. 31. May I, to October 31. (oT 210 Ponnds Ru icex Soe es 5612 lL = 6.2 Hatimated: butier 237257545 3542 Estimated butter .......... 153 Valve of butter... 42 202k $88.56 Weeme Wl DUiter ........... $3.83 Feed— Feed— - i od Sel cte «2 rated heath $ 6.63 1 2 16 SR: Abts sea) Voces croldleeae 4.34 ie <9 GPCL Base vaste. cyatee: dial, Pe susan 18.19 0 a 73 ae —_— GED LOCI ia ia wecracen $29.16 LA EY $1.28 PED, «2 chess elon chek $59.46 TD go eines ma) d nse e oes $2.55¢ (Shows photograph of Mary Marshall.) In lieu of the cow herself, I have here the photograph of the cow whose record is given as it stood at the close of the test: Mary Mar- shall, the champion in net profit in butter production of all cows compet- ing. Thousands of people passed through the barn nearly every day, ane these records, together with the animals making them, were studied by both city people and farmers. Very frequently young ladies as well as young men, college students. and business men were seen copying off these records with evident in- test in having learned something of the possibilities of dairying, and having seen the cows which made the records. A lesson which appeals to me as one of the most important to be de- rived from all this work, isthattaught by a comparison of the extremes of profitable production found in the same herd. It is altogether likely 7 130 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. that in selecting individuals for any of the herds to take part in this great test, more care was exercised than would ordinarily be in making up a herd for private use by the farmer or dairyman who buys his cows, and yet, we had at Buffalo a very great range in profitable production in nearly all breeds. Several of the Canadian cows were selected without much use of the Babcock test, and several of these were disappointing; some of our breeds had few available animals to select from, making it impossible to geta uniform herd, but a most striking instance of uniformity occurred in the Guernsey herd. Medora Fern was selected on account of her fine ap- pearance. Little was known of her previous performance, and she did not promise great things when the scales and Babcock were applied just before the final selection, but her good looks let her in contrary to the better judgment of her herdsman. me CHART III. Medora Fern. Born January, 1894. Week ending October 31. May 1 to October 31. Last calf April 9, 1901. POON Meee rite eters es 84.5 Pounds milk... ..: 9-omeen 4225 EOS Wes ceca laratastive taneiots 6 Sra 4.9 Estimated butter .......0. 215 Estimated butter ......... 4.87 Value’ butter... 0 sane $53.75 “Malus patter.) as $1.22 Cost of feed— Cost of feed— HAY os ecko \aiiegeenee $6.92 PAV ciciccaabion ee comme S ols Silage .... .. 1caeeeee 4.61 SLE ae ee ee Rae Se, 39 GTAID \. .c..6 60 5 oe lee 12.83 VAUD S Ae coisa ears ase eae peace ile — Total feed :.....ii 50a $24.36 SE ObaAl CCG) silage. This makes bran $20.00: giuten over $21.00; ground oats $25.00; hay $14.00 and silage $4.00. Pan- Pres- BREED MAME Test Amr. ent Prices Prices oo ae I Ma1y Marskall ...... 5.386 59.40 24.66 Medora: Mem. .73.0<.°- 4.36 29.36 2.80 re Primrose: 222. P.is56'. 15.64 50.25 18.90 ECR Sy ah xe'ee e ale 3.98 38.52 10.10 Lo 2 er TREE Rs Cine lina e ces, « 3.59 46.97 13.87 Baas Me wa isco 3.40 38.70 8.87 0 ee BOROCi ie ee caea een ewes 3.42 49.35 13.75 BIBS Bones ats cnc os 3.25 36.60 2.70 INURE. fh. oc oo Dee cee we RITVUOWER Gs Docc s @cine 4.45 52.10 19.42 RR Ete Ws. na tle. ce cite 3.65 ‘Si.cd). dba fe a Se POG ta oN Os sate Beare 4.09 41.23 11.80 Pte Oar. ed Uereing Fae care 3.25. 30.35 .09 Prence meamadian ..............: BIGRISS. os oa bas hate dies 4.03 40.64 13.38 BaBOuUch 305s wetiene. 3.67 22.94 1.85 SS eee Molle cucsens so sect 3.71 43.01 9.02 DISA clatter «$d an 3.43 28.80 2.40 In these days of high priced feeds, a small difference in economical broducing power among cows which are generally called good dairy cows. makes the difference between the profit and loss. Take the Ayreshire herd, which was considered by all who saw them, as the most uniform herd and finest representatives of their 132 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. breed; we find here that the best one made nearly 20 per cent greater profit than the poorest at the Pan-American prices with almost exactly the same ration, while 20c per lb. for butter and present prices for feed, the difference would have been over 50 per cent. This marked difference in cows brought together from _ different localities would seem to teach that dairymen should not depand en buy- ing cows to keep up the herd, but should build up and gradually improve by rearing from the best athandand constantly weeding out the poorest. Even a careful test with Babcock and scales at just one time, will not tell what a cow will do for a year or for six months, and the best of judges are often deceived by appearances. Medora Fern made a very good showing for three months, but then fell off rapidly, while apparently n perfect heaith; and at the end of the six months was making very little profit with butter at 25c. One point about ihe best and poorest cow of each breed at the Pan- American, which seems a little strange, and yet would certainly seem sig- nificant, is the fact that in every breed the most profitable cow tested high, and tre lesser profitable one low (for their breed.) In several of the breeds the profit of the five cows is graded just in the order of the richness of their milk. Notice the test of the Jerseys in the order of their profit from highest io lowest: 5.64, 4.74, 4.40, 4.27, 3.98. The Brown Swiss, 4.09, 3.80, 3.61, 3.45, 3.25. In nearly all breeds tliere is some uniformity of progression in rich- ness corresponding with profit, but there are of course some irregularities in this. ~ COMPOSITION OF MILK. Since my part of the work in this test was the weighing and testing of milk for butter fat and total solids, I shall confine the balance of my remarks to this phase of the work. The average composition of milk of the several breeds at Buffalo for butter fat and for total soiids is shown by the following table: ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 133 COMPOSITION OF MILK. Percent total Breed. fat solids Poiled. Jerseys’ oo. .i,0s sk 50 4.66 13.93 GWErNSEYSi estat tos 24) Seat 4.60 13.92 PRES OU tra oe Sen OE IG Sass Shor 4.58 13.96 I'rench Canadiaa ........ 3.99 13.32 Berg olleds o's oco5h et 3.98 13.14 ‘ PUM TMLIBOS et ietets see, oo ab ere 3.69 12.69 BOWNESS WASS: sso ence cee. O8 4266 MONE CROTUS i. ce oo %.c biel oe 3.57 12.84 Diveh: Belted: 2 eco. Ss. es 5.40 12.31 MPS OMI Sich) siete aig Brad oe sie 3.25 12.08 INCREASE IN PER CENT FAT DURING PAN-AMERICAN.. During the six months every one of the fifty cows made a gain in richness incident to the advance cof lactation period. By averaging the four weeks composite tests for cach cow, for the last month separately, we have a kasis for determining this gain without having to contend with the fluctuations from week to week caused by things seen and unseen. Comparing these averages for the months of May and October we find “every cow gained, from tie Guernsey, Cassiopia, with a gain of only 1 per cent, to the Polled Jersey, Queen, with a gain of over 2 per cent. The gain in richness of the mixed milk of the five cows of each breed was as follows: French Canadian, 1.1 per cent; Jerseys, .93; Guernseys, .9; Shorthorns, .9; Polled Jerseys, .8; Brown Swiss, .7; Red Polis, .6; Ayrshires, .6; Holsteins, .52; Dutch Belt, .5. Of the 50 cows, twenty-eight averaged to test higher for sach montk | of the six than for the preceding menth. Eleven cows missed this uniform progression by testing lower for some one month than for the some pre- teding month The other eleven cid not increase in test with such uni- 134 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. formity. As most of the drops in ike test occurred in the months which were excessively not, and the cows known to be very uncomfortable from heat, it may be safe to attribute most of them to that cause. Considering that, with a few exceptions, all the cows in the test had calved within two months of the opening, which would bring them from six to eight months in lactation at the close, a natural conclusion ' from the above data would be, that with cows calving in spring and stabled through summer, the percent of fat increases as the period of lactation advanced. THE COMFOSITE TEST. During a part of the time, the separate milkings of each of ibe five cows of some breed were tested ircdependently of the composite test for the full week corresponding with the composite week. This was done partly as a check against possible tampering with the composite sam- ples, ard partly as-a matter of intercst in showing the accuracy of the composite method of testing. As there is likely to be in th ¢ audience a number of patrons as wel. as proprietors of creameries, I thcught it might not be out of place t« show how nicely the two methods p:oved each other and how indisputa- bly accurate the composite method is, if handled with a _ reasonabie amount of care. Each milking was weighed “When brought to the dairy room, at once poured into a “‘shot-gun can,’ asample taken with milk thief into the composite jar, one dipped cut forthe lactometer test and a third one taken with the pipette direct into the Babcock bottle. These last mentioned samples were tested every day and the composite sample at the end of the week. The sum of all the different amounts of fat obtained by multiplying each milking by its test, should of course equal the product of the total yield of milk for the week and the composite test. Or, on the other hand, the sum of the daily fats divided by the total milk yield should equal the ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. ic composite test. Of the 35 cows tested in this way, not one differed more than one-tenth of one per cent\tetween tie composite test and the per cent of fat, as shown by the severai milkings. And in no case was there a difference of more than one-fourth of a pound of fat for the week’s work; several agreed exactly. In further support of the reliability of the Babcock test and alse of the composite method. I weuld say that of the 1300 official tests made in connection with this work (each one of which was run in duplicate) only seven of these pairs differed more than .1 per cent. Where a difference of more than this occurred, the test was repeated. VARIATIONS OF TESTS. Creamery patrons are apt to demand aa explanation of any sudden change in the test of their milk at the creamery. Some of them seem to think that tie man who operates the test should be ante to tell why the difference occurs ,and I believe some buttermakers, rather than plead ignorance, sometimes offer explanations which may seem to him to answer the purpose for the time being. but which fails to apply at some other time. The man who feeds and milks the cow is really in better position to give intelligent reasons for variations in the test, but I see no reason why either one should be ashamed to own that they do not know, as it is pretty certain that there are a great many more things still to be learned on the subject than Lave been learned up to date. A few things which affect the richness of milk of the individual cow from day to day or from weekto week are pretty well established, but since some of these variations of individuals are equalized in the herd. we have fewer reasons for great variations in herd milk. The larger the herd the more uniform should be the test from week to week, cther things being equal. One of the Jersey cows atthe Pan-Amzrican jumped around in test for successive milkings as follows: 5.6, 4.9, 3.7, 5.6, 5.2, 2.5, 4.7, 3.8, 2.9 £36 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. and 3.5, but the same cow’s weekly composite tests ran fairly even for successive weeks, thus: 3.95, 4.0, 4.1, 3.7, 4.1, 4.4, 4.2, 4.2 and 4.0. In like manner the variations cf individual cows from week to week are partially obliterated in the test of the mixed milk of the herd. Some of the greatest variations in herd tests for successive weeks at the Pan- American were as follows: Jerseys beginning with the week of August 6th, and for succeedings weeks was 4.32, 4.80, 4.40. The French Cana- rian July 16th and succeeding weeks, 3.59, 4.03, 3.87, 4.09. The Guernseys for weeks of July 30 and August 6 went 4.42 and 4.72. I believe the Babcock test has been repudiated by creamery patrons sometimes for showing variations from week to week: no greater than the above, just because they knew rot reason why the milk shou!d vary at ail. But worse than this, and some times a direct result of kicking on the test, is the practice of evening up the tests by a dishonest butter- maker, who prefers to remove any seeming inconsistencies in the test be- fore giving them out. I regret that such things as this have been known to occur, and am sure that such practices as this have in one way and another resulted in much lack of faith in the test even when honestly and intelligently handled. When I find the test uf a creainery running uniform from week to week with a range of only .4to.6 per cent among a large number of patrons, I am suspicious that all may not be right. it may be of interest to know that with every breed tested for con- secutive milkings at the Pan-American, nearly every cow tested lowest in the morning. Five of the breeds tested in this way (25 cows) were milked three times a day, at 5:00a. m., 12:30 p. m., and 8:00 p. m., mak- ing the night period 9 hours and the other two 7% hours each. With these cows the morning’s' milk tested lowest, the noon milk highest, and the night milk between the two. Two breeds so tested were milked only twice a day at equal intervals and al! of these averaged to test lower in the morning. This seems toindicate that the milking following the period of rest was least rich in fat, regardiess of the comparative length of periods. ; ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 137 The difference in richness was not very great in most instances, but much greater with the Jerseys than any other breed. The avarage test of noon milk of the Jersey herd for one week was 5.34, for the night milk 4.61, and for the morning 3 97, a difference of 1.37 per cent between morn- ing and noon milkings. By the President: There are books at the end of the hall to which you are all welcome. They are last year’s report. Read them and you will come back next year and join us. CREAMERY BUTTERMAKING A. E. THOMPSON, FOPULAR GROVE. ILL. By the President:—Mr. Thompson is the gentleman who took his little tub of butter over to Dubuque and brought back the grand sweep- stakes of Iliinois. Mr. President, Members of the Illinois State Dairymen’s Association, Ladies and gentlemen: In presenting a paper on the subject assigned me, Practical Creamery Buttermaking, I shall advocate no particular method as be- ing superior to all others, but wili only try to give a few details of my regular every day work. One of the most important things in successful buttermakirg is a good starter. With a good starter, rightly handled, the buttermaker has the ripening of the cream practica'ly under his control, while with no starter, he must trust largely to chance. To prepare a starter, I pasteurize skim milk at 180 degrees, and hold at this temperature not less than 30 minutes; then commence to cool and when cooled to 80 degrees, add about 2 per cent of previous day's start- er and continue the cooiing to 68 degrees, or 72 degrees, depending on the weather. 138 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. As soon as cream vatis emptied and washed, starter is put in, and when separating commences the brine coil is connected with line shaft and cream kept constantly stirre/ irom beginning to end of separating. In tempering milk for the separator, we use an ordinary tempering vat, the capacity of which is only equal to about one-third of our sep- arating capacity. This lack of capacity is made up by the use of live steam directly into the milk. 1 know this is contrary to the teachings of the present time, but if rightly used I see no harm in it, at least, I have made some high scoring butter in this way. The temperature at which milk Is skimmed is from 78 degrees in winter to 88 degrees in winter. ) We use the Alpha separators, running at a speed of 6,000 revolu- tions per minute; each one separating 2,000 lbs. of milk per hour; cream screws set to deliver a 45 to’/50' per cent of cream. At time of finishing separating, 10:30 o’clock, cream is ata temper ature of 70 to 76 degrees. From this time on, cream receives no further attention until the required acidity is obtained, which usually takes from three to four hours. When the required acidity is obtained, cream is cooled to from 46 degrees in summer to 54 degrees in winter. The point to which cream is cooled being guaged somewhat on the weather and time required for churning. When cooled, cream receives no further attention until churn- ing time, 4 o’clock next morning. Churning is doneata temperature of 56 degrees, or as low as possi- ble and have the butter come in a reasonable time. This point is de- pendant somewhat on amount of cream to be churned and size of churn. As soon as cream begins to break ten to fifteen gallons of water is added and churning continues ufhtil butter granules are about the size of wheat grain. The buttermilk is then run off and butter washed once in water at a temperature of 52 to 53 Cegrees. Butter is worked once on a Mason worker and salted to suit the de- mands of the market. __”™ eee ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 139 Secretary Caven specified that I should give details as to care that Was exercised to get good milk. In this connection I will say, if a can of milk comes to the factory either sour or bloody, I return it with a letter tied to the can, explaining what is wrong with it. Another point which I think has a very great influence on the qual- ity of milk delivered to the factory, is the pasteurization of the skim milk. Saying nothing about the other advantages of pasteurizing, the one fact of running the hot milk into the patrons cans is, in my estimation, a decid- ed benefit, and since commencing to pasteurize, December 5th last, Il am satisfied we are getting decidedly a better quality of milk. DISCUSSION. Mr. Hostetter:—I would like to Lear a little more about this starter. A:—In what respect? Q:—Whether you get your own culture from skim milk? Q:—I selected about two gallons of skim milk from a patron who brings fairly good milk and run that through the separator and pasteuriz- ed that at 180 degrees the same as tke other and add the pure culture to that at about a temperature of 79 to 72 degrees and hold 48 hours. Then I use that in ripening up the larger quantity. Q:—How do you hold your starter, what conveniences have you? A:—For starting the culture, I use a half barrel set upon ashelf with steam and start to about 70 to 72 Gegrees, depending of course upon the wether and get the water around it. Leave it at night 76 degrees and in the morning it is about where I want it. Q:—What kind of a starter can do you use? A:—The starter can is of tin or copper 22 inches in diameter by about 40 inches high, probably 32. Unisiontly high to make it &st the 40 gallons. Some use galvanized iron about 6inchesindiameter. There has to be a little water space of 3 inches on the sides and 2 0n the bottom. That has steam coil connections. Q:—What percent starter Jo you use? 140 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. A:—Usually from 18 to 25 per cent. Q:—Will it run through a hair sieve? A:—yYes sir. We may havetc shake the sieve the last time a little ‘but; not a great deal. Q:—How often do you get milk. A:—Every day Sundays includ: d. : Q:—If that starter should besoin<; thick, would you advise warming ‘it and getting whey and putting that in, would that be injurious? A:—I am inclined to think that would be injurious. I don’t know anything abouc putting whey in. 1 never heard of it until I heard your paper today. I have tried warming the starter, once tomy sorrow. You can very easily make white specks in your butter by warming your starter. Of course using whey would not produce white specks. I don’t know how that would affect it. . Q:—Suppose you was running a creamery three days in a week could you hold that starter from Friday to Monday? A:—I never had any experience in that line. I think the way would be to pasteurize your skim milk and cool it down toa very low point and hold it until you wanted to ripenit up. I would try that. Q:—Don’t you think if it}was cooled to 40 degrees it would hold all Tishic’, A:—lIt is possible it might hoid 24 hours. Not longer than that. Q:—What per cent of acidity in your cream when you start? A:—Well, of course, I use the Farrington tabiets, but it is my im- pression that our tablets are weak. I run to .65 to .70 per cent. Q:—Ever damp or soft? A:—No sir. But you take 35 per cent cream and run in 70 rer cent acidity, it is rather higu. Q:—How long have you kad them? A:—Over a year. Q:—I would say here,i havehad a talk with Farrington recently in regard to these tablets. They will not weaken in strength but the solu- ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 14k tion will. I have tablets whichI have had a year and a half and I find for proper acidity Irun up as high as 70 to 81 per cent, yet the tablets are all right and will not lose in strength. Q:—Did you ever have any trouble in getting too much starter in that your cream gets too thick, will not string readily? A:—No sir, never had any tro ible. Q:—In my work in Wisconsin I have found some of Farrington’s tablets which were too weak. I carried with me what is called a normal solution for the purpose of testing tablets, and I have found in more than one case where the Farrington tablets had lost strength, but that is more than a year ago, they haveprobably changed them now. If damp or soft they will weaken. I found in one instance they were only about one-half strength. I think as a rule where the tablets are new and hard and firm and not allowed to get moist they are all right. Prof. Erf:—I find once in a while that the water that you use has a great deal to do with the acidity, sometimes sterilizes the tablets with the acidity in the water. Some acids in water makes a lot of difference. Q:—Ever tried the milk from fresh cows and used that for a starter instead of using pure culture? A:—I have used skim milk starter; as to whether the cows were fresh or not I could notsay. Iselecited milk from good clean fiavored milk and I will say that as good a starter can be made with good skim milk as from pure culture, but it is not as uniform. The President:—Whose culture do you use? A:—Douglas. Mr. Hositetier:—Do you know whether this starter is made from fresh cows or regular cows’ milk? Prof. Erf:—Not always. We vrefer miik from cows that have been milked three montis. Q:—-Will this milk from fresh cuws make fancy butter. Pror. Erf:—It seems to geta sori of'a rancid cr a sort of an older: flavor from fresh cows. 142 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. DAIRY FIELD WORK IN ILLINOIS. A. J. GLOVER, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen: I am glad of the opportunity to get acquainted with the dairymen of the state of Illinois. I hope to meet some of you after this meeting and explain the work more in detail. While I cannot takea great deal more work, there is still a chancefor some of you to have your cows tested. Illinois is offering to her dairymen what no other state in the union is extending—a chance for them to find out what each cow is doing in their herds, without any expense to th em. Illinois ig the first state that is offering to its dairymen an opportu- nity of this kind. It has been realized for a long time by close observing men, that there are many cows in the state that do not pay for the feed they consume. The object of the work is to improve the dairy conditions, by getting dairymen to see better methods of breeding, feeding and caring for their cows; by getting them to take better care of their milk; but getting them to build better lighted and beter ventilated barns; by betting them to select better sires for their herds, and by getting them to select better cows, and to sell their poor ones. The work is not alone confined to the farmers, but whenever time al- lows, I visit creameries and milkmen. If there is anything I can do to help them, 1 gladly do so. The aim of the work is to make dairying more profitable, to have the farmers k,eep better cows, get cleaner and better nilk on the market, and toimprove the conditions of the creameries, or, in a word, to raise the dairy standard in this great state of Illinois. The method of doing this work does not involve any direct expense. on the parties having the work done. Whenever we find a dairyman in- terested enough, in the improving of his ccws, to weigh and sample the ILLINOIS STATE LAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 143 milk from each of them, every seventh week, we furnish hinj the neces- sary apparatus for doing the work. The outfit consists ofa pair of spring scales, milk sheet, sample bottles and tablets for preserving composite samples of milk. The party who undertakes this work is expected every seventh week to weigh and sample accurately each mess of m‘]k from each cow in the herd for fourteen consecutive milkings. When the weighing and sampling of the milk are completed, I visit his place and test the composite sampies. I am able, with the weights and tests, to determ- ine the amount of milk and butter fat that each cow produces during the week her milk is weighed andsam pled. I estimate from these weights and tests the amount of milk and butter fat she has produced three weeks before the period of weighing and Lesting, and three weeks follow- ing. I have some farmers whoare keeping approximate account of the am- ount and kind of feed fed to their cows. This makes the record much more complete, and my report will be of more value. The accounting for the kind and the amount of feed is not demanded of the person who ac- cepts this work, but we are more than anxicus to have them doit. The part of the work that we ask the farmer to perform, is to weigh and sam- ple the milk from each cowevery seventh week and to carry me to and from the station, for doing their testing. He kas no expense, and onlya. little labor, to have a compiete record of every cow in his herd. This record tells him how much milk and butter fat each cow in his herd has produced during the year and when feed is weighed it will give him how muchshe has consumed to produce this milk and butter fat. Or, in other words, what she has charged him for her keeping. The time re- quired for doing this work depends on the number of cows inthe herd. With ten cows, it requires about ten minutes more time each day to Jo the milking, about seventy minutes every seventh week, or about eight hours per year to do all theextra work. These few hours of time spent give him a record of each cow in his herd. It is my duty to keep all the records of the cows that I am testing, and to report to the owner at the end of thé year what each cow has done. 144 ~ ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. I have, so far, only ninemen who have seen fit to take hold of this work. These men own about 273 cows, and nearly all of them are now giving milk. I have already hinted at the necessity of weeding out the poor cows, and keeping only the goodones. And right here I want to state my rea- sons: In the spring of 1900, Hoard’s Dairyman made arrangements with Mr. Kinsiey to make a special investigation of 100 creamery patrons in the state of lowa. The following Itake from Hoard’s Dairyman: ‘‘He was to visit each patron, make a special study of his farm methods, note the nutober and breeding of his cows, which he had milked the year previous, and to determine as nearly as possible just what his cows had cost him, in value, to feed. Also he was to take note of the owner himself, with a view of determining how much intelligence he was putting into his ~ After all these facts were ascertained, he was to visit the creamery and obtain the record of the yield of milk and butter per herd, for the year, and price received. This, when divided with the number of cows, gave the earning at the creamery per cow. Finally, he was to measure the cost of keep and determine the valudin butter from each cow, for every dollar’s worth of feed which had been given her. Nothing was to be said as to the cost of labor expended on the cows and milking and care.” “The total number of cows in these 100 herds was 982. There were four herds that ranged from $2.11 to $2.50 for every dollar’s worth of feed expended. There were 61 besides, out of the 100, which averaged from one dollar upward for every dollar’s worth of feed consumed. The highest being $1.91, the lowest $1.00. Of these 12 returned from $1.50 to $1.90. 23 herds returned from $1.00 to $1.20 for every dollar they expended in feed.” “Now we come to the darkside of the picture. Thirty-five of these patrons out of the 100, received less than one dollar {rom the creamery for every dollar they spent in feed, 1nd the loss ran all the way from 2 cents to 56 cents. The extreme contrast is one man recciving $2.30 and another 44 cents. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 145 Now was it the creamery or the patron that was responsible for this difference? At the Illinois Experiment Station, Mr. Fraser fou:¢] that 2 cows coui‘d practically consume thesame amount of feed and give different am- ounts of milk and butter fat. Rose and Nora were the names of the two cows that wereinthisexperiment. Rose gave 11329 pounds of milk, 564 8-10 pounds of butter fat; and Nora gave 7759 4-10 of milk and 298 64- 100 pounds of butter fat. Prof. Haecker of the Minnesota Experiment Station found that he had cows in his herd that paid a net profit of $50.00, othera $20.00, and others only $8.00. The cows were all fed and cared for alike, but yet there were these great differences. . At the Wisconsin Experiment Station they found some cows in their herd that ever charged somethin g for their keeping. These different results show us that it is not alto gether a question of feed, but t he breed- ing oi the animal must be considered. And this is not enough. She should also be put to test from time to time, in order to find out whether she is a prfitable cow or not. It seems to me fittingand wise for the farmers to dispose of their poor cows, and keep only the good ones. These facts that I have presented to you must appeal to you when the prices of feed are high as they are at the present time. What is the use of keeping cows upon your farm that do not pay you for their board? Why not sell them, and why not keepa cow that produces 350 pounds of butter, instead of a cow that produces on- _ly 150 pounds of butterina year? The labor is the same,and she usually consumes the same amount of feed. I had rather have ten cows giving me a profit of $50 per head, thanto have 100 cows that were oniy giving me a net profit of $8.00 a piece. But there are many dairymen who are keep- ing cows that do not pay for the feed they consume, as it has been shown _ with some of the patrons of the lowa creameries. Some of the da irymen, to whom I have offered this work, call it “Book Farming.” These same people would not employ a doctor or a lawyer who were not learned in books. Let us put aside our prejudices, 146 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. and look squarely at the subject to see whether our cows are the best, our milk that we produce the cleanest and best, that our butter is of the high- est quality possible for us to attain. Hoard once said, when speaking in Massachusetts on the subject of breed, an old Yankee stood upand said it was not in the breeding, but all in the corncrib. Hoard refiected a moment and then said, “You are the man I have been looking forallthese years. You say it is allin the corn crib. Uncle, how would you feed one of those razor-back hogs to make a Berkshire out of it? How woulda you feed a dairy cow’ to make a Short- horn of her? Let me tell ycuthat there is a horse named J. I. C. that trotsa mile in 2:10 on 12 quarts of oatsa day; yet I'll bet you have horses on your farm that couldn’t trota mile in four minutes if you had run ten tons of oats though them. No, my friend, it is not all in the corn crib.” 9 DISCU SSION. Mr. Hostetter:—I would like to extend an invitation to have you come and test my cows, and have them on your list. A:—Yes, sir; I think wecan make arrangements, if you will see me afterwards. I would like to meet any one after the meeting who is in- terested in this testing. By the President:—If you live in the right place, Mr.. Glover will ve pleased to meet and make arrangements to test your COWS. FEEDING THE DAIRY HERD. BY M.S. CAMPBELL. Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen: I am not much of a speaker. I was asked to come here and tell you how I handled my dairy herd, and it will not take more than a few minutes of your time. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 147 On account of the extreme high prices for feed, it occurred to me along in November, that I must do some thing to make a profit i: handling my herd. My cows apparently were eating up all I got from them, and when oats were 45 cents a bushel and brand $22.00 a ton. I could not stand those expenses. Sol put my cows on the following feed in December: Silage, $8.62 worth; hay, $5.50. and shelled corn, $3.00. I gave them oat straw to pick at. That constituted all my cows’ feed. I tiailked twelve. There were five of them 2 year old; three out of five had been milked 15 months, and the remainder three and five year old. Those twelve gave 7146 pounds of milk at $1.15 makes about $82.00, and with an expense of $17.12 for feed, I received about $65.06 clean profit from my entire herd. I will say here that my hay was clover hay, and that substitutes for grain they did not get the month before. Mr. Glover was at my place and we figured this thing over and I think that my cows were receiving on an average about 1.34 pounds protein per cow a day, where I had been feeding before 2.12 pounds protein per day. My test increased at the creamery on this feed to what it was when they were eating 10 pounds ration of bran and oats, less that clover hay. My cows are handled probably the same as everybody else’s cows are handled. House them inafairly good barn; its nothing extra, only just medium. I give them pure waterto drink twice a day and clover hay to eat once a day, and straw atnoon. They have the chance twice a day to the water tank asI said and they get pure water. They are groomed only occasionally. Judging from what the gentleman said yesterday about using 25 per cent muscle,I den’t think my cows are giving what they would according to his theory; I think my self they would be better if cleaned oftener. People in our neighborhood claim that it is costing them $1.75 a hundred for milk and they are only receiving $1.15 a hun- dred for their milk. I think if my cows were doing that I would put them on hardtack. 148 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. DISCUSSION. Q:—Do you think your cows would have given just as much if you had not had silage? A:—No sir. Q:—What would you substitute in case you took your milk to the condensing factory, where you can’t use silage? A:—If I had to do that, I don’t think I would take my milkthere. No man is going to dictate to me wha! I shall give my cows to eat. There is too much dictation on what we produce. The factory may set up a howl to us about cleaner milk and clearer barns and better goods, but it is a fact, nevertheless, that some of the creameries in my district are not clean. If my barn was as dirty as their creameries are I would not at- tempt to clean it. I would burnit. I will venture to say that you can go to my barn tonight and if it is not cleaner than some of these creameries, I will pay all your expenses and use you well, and will leave it to Mr. Glover who has been there. Q:—Do you think a person would know you was using silage? A:—I have my doubts. Q:—Can you taste silageinyour milk? A:—I never have and weuseit on the table. I take my milk to the creamery where there are 69 patrons and some of this milk goes to Chi- cago and is sold in there, and the creameryman says it is the nicest flavored milk he receives. I am the only one using silage. I used to think silage tasted in the milk, but it don’t, it gives a fine flavor. Q:—Did you say you are feeding no grain? A:—Only excepting corn silage. In November I milked eleven cows. I fed $6.65 worth of silage; $3.00 shelled fodder; $20.00 oats. Bran in my barn I paid $14.75 atonfor. Theexpense of feeding the eleven cows was $41.65. I took to two different creameries and those cows returned me $52.98 worth of milk at an xpense cf $41.65, a net profit of $11.33 for the same cows. We have one more now. Q:—Are your cows losing flesh? ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 149 A:—Only one. Q:—How much ensilage for each cow? A:—On an average, about 4) peunds aday. In November 35 pounds. Q:—is your silage full;corn in the ear? A:—It is the native corn. Q:—You have given the corn in the silage4 A:—Yes sir. Q:—If fed by the baskei, how much would you give? A:—The cows vary so; will «at a scant basket. Q:—Feed silage morning and evening? Q:—Yes sir, and clover just be fore milking. Q:—How much clover? A:—I estimated they were eating five pounds a day, and night before last I took my fork and put it around in little piles and weighed it and I found my cows were receiving less than four pounds on an averagea day, Dut I had charged them with five pounds. Q:—What price did you charge the silage? A:—$1.15 in the silage. Q:—Isn’t silage worth whai you can get for it’ A:—I could not get more four it. Q:—Couldn’t you get more thas $1.15 a ton? A:—I don’t think I could get 50 cents a ton in my neighborhood. Q:—What condition is your corn in when you put it in the silo” A:—Nicely dented. Q:—What price the straw? A:—$35.00. Q:—-What part do you live? A:—DeKalb county. Q:—How many tons of silage from an acre? A:—About nine tons. Q:—What is the cost of labor to put it in the silo? A:—I could not tell you here; I figured it all in. 150 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Q:—The actual labor? A:—I figured everything except my own labor. I hired some work. but most of the work that I had to kave done in filling my silo I worked back in helping my neighbors thresk, and then I worked myself. Q:—What do you figure the corn item? A:—Ten dollars an acre. Corn sold in our neighborhaad under the hammer from $8.00 to $11.50 an acre, and I thought $10.00 a fair estimate for the corn. I don’t think my corn would have brought that. It was on a piece of land that was not right good for corn and I did not have right good corn. Gow much to the acre husked out, how many bushels? A:—Twenty-five, may be. It was very poor ground; ought to have had 40 bushels. Q:—Were you feeding the same way last year? A:—More grain ration last year. Q:—Didn’t you have a silo? A:—Yes sir. Q:—Did you feed silage? A:—For about five or six months. Q:—You think at the present time, if feeding a grain ration you would increase more? A:—My cows lost 50 pounds of milk in a day, twelve cows, and I was. feeding $2.00 a day to those cows. Q:—You think you can carry your cattle through on this system? A:—I think so, have been at it over thirty days. Q:—You say that they lost 5@ pounds when feeding grain ration; d>» you think they will hold out in this? A:—I think they will. It isan experiment at my own cost. Q:—Do the cows seem to be satisfied ? A:—They are now. At first they were not. I did not quit their grain ration all at once. [ took ten days todoitin. I took and fea them clover hay at grain feeding time when they were looking for something: to eat; took their attention off the grain. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 151 Q:—What was the test of that 1700 pounds of milk? A:—3.6. Q:—Your cows were diminishing in milk? A:—They are holding on now. Q:—Does this $11.00 profit include the value of the skim milk also at these creameries? A:—I sell my milk right out so muck a hundred. If I take skim milk away, I pay for it at the rate of 15 cents. Mr. Sawyer:—I would like to know whether you think they will hold out through the winter? A number of years ago I went through this same siege and I would like io tell you you need not be anxious as long as your ensilage and clover hay hold out. Some one asked him about his cows holding out. My cows were in far better condition after feed- ing this feed all winter than when I took them off grass in the fall. Mr. Campbell:—The day my cows were put on to this feed, Mr. Glover was there and when he came again | asked him to look them over and@ tell how the cows compared in looks. Mr. Glover, you said you could not see they had lost? Mr. Glover:—I could not see it. It had been seven weeks since 1 saw them before, but I saw no change. Q:—How much ensilage and clover hay was fed. A:—tThey ate in the neighborhood of 40 to 45 pounds ensilage. Gave them all the ensilage they would eat, and gave them all the corn fodder they would eat. Q:—How many ears of corn would each cow get? A:—I could not say. The corn that I fed went about nine tons to the acre. It was a heavy yield of corn but a poor standard of corn on the ground. Probably averaged two stalks to the hill. It was planied for field corn. The stalks were large and the ears were large. Q:—Naturally think ten staiks to make a basket full. A:—I don’t know. ° Mr. Cobb:—We carried a herd of 40 cows on ensilage and clover hay without anything else whatever,and my recollection is that they shrunk rS2 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. a small amount of milk on the start, but not nearly enough to justify a grain ration, and they milked right along and kept in good health with that feed. ‘The only drawback to the transaction was that they were in a barn that was too cold for them. If the barn had been warm I think it would have been more profitable. Mr. Glover:—I am going to keep track of Mr. Campbell’s cows and will let you know about them. President: —Convention will stand adjourned until this evening at 7:30. We have some good things onthe program. Mr. Cobb will tell us how to build a siloand whatto putinit. We commence the program tonight with a lady from Southern Illinois, and f would like all the gentlemen, if they have lady friends to bring them out su as to have a few more ladies with the gentlemen. I would like to have ihe house filled. We also kope to have the butter scores read tonight. The Board of Trade Medal is to be given to the man whois employed by a member of the Elgin Board of Trade, who makes the highest score. Wednesday Evening, January 8th, 1902 Convention called to crder by the President. Music by orchestra. Song, by Hon. Jules Lumbard. Encored. By the President: We will now take a little of the more serious side of life. Mrs. Copeland will talk to us on the Educational Side of Farm Life. Allow me to introduce Mrs. Copcland. THE EDUCATIONAL SIDE OF FARM LIFE. BY MRS. M. L. COPELAND, MARION, ILL. Mr. President and Friends of this Association: It gives me great pleasure to be with you. I was thinking that today we had had the business side of life discussed very thoroughly, and in a ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. rea way that certainly was helpful tu us all. Then I thought of the artiSe I would have with you on the educational part of life discussed, or, we might say, useful too. We have been amused by the humorous side, by the recitation we have just listened tc. As I said, I was very much pleased to be with you. for the first timein the northern part of Illinois. Iwas born and reared in the extreme southern part of Illinois. I thoughi, as I came into your town today— this beautiful January winter day--as I looked across these lands, at the broad prairies, of history of long ago. I was thinking of two very great men who were giants in making history, who met in this town in the sum- mer of 1858. Of those two men who met here to discuss those serious questions oi their times, and who fell as martyrs to the cause of right— they met in this town of Freeport. And that great giant of his time in intelligence was also here again. We call to mind who they were—Lin- coln and Douglas. I thought of how this country had made history, and the recollections of this town, and em pleased to be here and talk with you. ‘ In these times of marvelous invention and rapid transit, where there is so much to be seen and heard, we are almost like what Walpole said of England in the beginning of the 18th century, so great were the changes and achievements. There each morning the question came, “What new victory for England today? While so much is written and read and so many things said, every true heart is longing for the very practical things of life. Marconi had no doubt his many theories which were his helpers, but when space was overcome and the Atlantic ocean ceased to be as it were, between America and Europe, then civilization congratulated the inventor for the practical work. So with anything which we may say in this discussion. If it be prac- tical, then we hope to have benefitted some one. Education is two-fioid. It is acquiring and giving. It means to lead forth; to bring out. Hence, the native qualities of man at birth, we hope 154 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. to enlarge upon, and by his retentive faculties, the memory and reason, we gain through nature our best teacher. We also gain what is termed “learning” through books and by experiment. It has been well said, ‘What sculpture is to the block of marble, education is to the human soul.”’ So in a measure our education is with us at birth and in previous generations. For the records of our courts show whole generations of bad blocd. Some may call to mind the New York woman whose several hundred criminals were a menace to so- ciety. On the other hand wercmember that the genealegy of Jcnathan Edwards’ family showed a number of preachers, sixty-five college pro- fessors, several missionaries and scores of worthy farm citizens, whose quiet, honest lives were as a leaven to the nation. We know it pays to.educate mind and heart as well, for not only our- selves in life’s short day, but for those coming after us to perpetuate this great commonwealth, so hallowed by the blood and sacrifices of our patriots. We, as a younger people, in retrospectilig, can but truly give our grati- tude to those of our forefathers, who, by their struggles in pioneer days on unplowed prairies, or in heavy forests, prepared so well for our com- ing, and it becomes our duty to take up our responsibilities in good cheer and do our best. President Roosevelt nas said,in speaking of an American, that he should possess three things, without which he could never be a man, viz: Honesty, courage and common sense. He said: “The lesson of combin- ing zeal, fervor, intense enthusiasm, with broad charity and sanity—that is the lesson that w* all need to learn. The life worth living is the life of the man who works; of the man who strives; of the man who does}; of the man who, at the end, can lovk back and say, “I know I have falter-— ed, I know I have stumbled, I have left undone things that should have been done, and much that I have cone had better been left undone, but as the strength was given meI strove to use it; I strove to leave the ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. L55 world better and not worse, because 1 had lived in it.”” We feel proud to say there is no divine right of kings here; no royal road to greatness. No young man or woman can be great but through his own energy, or, in that homeiy but true phrase, “Get up and get.” If any do inherit a for- tune, it takes a good degree of comimon sense and work to keep it. We know “’Tis not in a wild chorus of praise nor chance, not yet fate; ’tis the greatness born in him and with him that makes man truly great.” It is wise to educate the infant, the youth, the man and even the old. for the older we grow the more accurate the thought should be. We love the thought of always being astudent, and these meetings should serve us right here. No one is so ignorant as the one whoin this age of science and development will say, “I know enough.”’ Some of us, upon inviting persons to take part in our institutions, have heard them say: “I have more good sense about farming than all the universities in Iilinois.” I don’t know how you think, but the thought of the Pnarisee of ancient Gays comes to me. Friends, if the great Newton, who is the marvel of time, could dis- cover the laws of gravitation and go to depths of science, and in his ripe years of knowledge and resource, exclaim, “I.seem to have been only like a boy playing on. the seashore and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble ora prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.” How can we, whose discoveries have been less great, exclaim we know enough? Then let us grasp these agencies for education. The Farmers’ Institute seems to us the beginning of something bet- ter; a newera. The 20th century :snovement indeed. Free from politics, sectarianism, or unions of any sort, the only requisite is for us to wish more knowledge. Why should not that occupat:on—farming—which is the very foundation of all earth as to sustenance, both physical and moral, as well receive every attention; receive highest honor, and why should not the farmer get fully equipped for ihe arduous and great responsibilities that ever have been, and ever will be, upon him? 756 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. In the Orient were originally but two occupations, farming and trading. That old rich empire, which we might call one vast farm, Egypt, grew wheat centuries before the Cliristian era, and the Nile watered as good grain as we have today. There is another phase whi’:h we can not Ciscuss at length, namely, there is a continual draw upon the farm for strong young men and women to fill important places in the nation. The offices to fill need physical strength as well. It is interesting to note that out of 385 members of the House and 90 Senators at our Capitol, (while but three Senators and fifteen Repre- sentatives registered as farmers) that 159 of them were either born on the farm, or spent their boyhood there. TheChristian Herald goes farther tosay: ‘“‘Notwithstanding this fact, but rather owing to it, they are a company ot well educated men, mary of them are self inade, in a sense that they have! made their own way in life, and 169 of them have been col- lege bred.” I would say to the farm boy, ‘Stick to your job.” We do nct often have droughts in the middle west so severe as the past year. When itis so with us, the luscious fruits of the orchard come Dlushing to us, bend- ing their boughs in sweet humility as if to apologize for the fields stint measure, and we of course accept the same with gratitude. We should not be discouragec. If we do our duty, there will be a call for us according to our ability. We cali to mind circumstances of the Putnam, called from the plow to head armies. Jacob watched the tiocks in Judea’s hills preparatory to becoming Israel’s king. Gen. Grant was hauling wood in St. Louis, and Robert Burns best poems were written while he was the Ayshire plowman. Neither be discouraged if, we are poor, for Lincoln said: ‘‘No men are more to be trusted than those who toil up from proverty or know the worth of a dollar more.” The monotony of farm life is now being relieved by advantages: of ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. I Cat NI rural mail, which has come tostay; by telephones and libraries; also better highways. I say thoughtfully, every home should possess a library. A few well chosen books each year added will soon be a source of education; a men- tal reservation from which to draw. Children iike to read and in the quiet of a country home will be found the best place to begin this habit. And right here, if there is any one thought that I wish to impress upon you, it is the plea for parents te see weil, so far as lies in their power, that the girls be educated; notso much to make them independent ina business sense, for here in America, independence seems to be first nature, that will follow, but educate for the sake of better homes, better mothers. and a better society. Wewhohave taught well know the drawback mentally and morally one illiterate mother is. in our rush to get gain, ana éverything else, we do not think of this and it is time to calla halt, and impress our daughters witha realization of God and responsibility of their lives. Here in the State of Iliinois, which leads in railroads, pork, in grain, and is the banner state of the middle west, numberless advantages are offered. \ Prince Chun of China said: “tiie United States won its standing in the world by its system of free education, giving all men an equal chance to reap the benefits of the culture ci the mind. The people are the best educators in the world. There is no question with which they can'not grapple successfully.” The more we enlarge our minds the keener our sensibilities. With our great opportunities come our responsibilities. The farm boy is educated in economy and industry. No slot machines or painted candy for every cent. The boy who wins against an ugly and ill-kept back yard and broken gates and transforms the same into grass plots, with shade, has won for himself a victory which wil! show greater things in manhood. I like the parable beginning “Behold a sower went forth to sow.” We all know the joy and hcpe WNen we plant. 158 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. It is not easy to labor, but to labor and to wait is harder still. The idle are the troublesome element in sckool and state. The virtue of pa- tience is also learned. For we know the “acorn does not become an oak inaday. The refined scholaristhe raw recuit of yesterday; there is al- ways months between the seed time and the harvest.” It is here we are educated to love to work. I could have said learn how, but to love work, and take rea! delight—not half-hearted. I have seen men plow as if it were a real punishment; also women cook as if it were a real burden. Such persons leave all undone that they can, and dislike the farm and almost everything else. We also know the farm gives a strong body, good health, the foun- dation, open airand sun. Noneed of gymnasium, climbing of hills and over fences, riding of horses; every muscle has full play. This beats all the gymnasiums from Mexico to Canada. No foot ball needed with broken limbs or crushed heads. God gives us a good form, strong arms, he did not give them to us to beat it up in pugilistic manner unless nec- essary in war. We only have one goul. We are to take care of this phy- sical body, keep it in good shape, not ruin it by vice or by things we could do without, but to keep it as a temple, and when the time comes to return it over in good condition. I thank God, after I spent a while in that rushing Chicago, with its pent up flats (as well as fine houses), that I could go to the orchard and stand in the June sun amid the corn and drink its freedom from so-called society, here to commune with GOd 'n the quiet hour. if we take the opportunities the farm offers we will be content. I like Whitcomb Riley’s, “Thoughts for the Discouraged Farmer.” Does the meadow lark complain, as he swims high and dry Thro’ the waves of the wind and the blue of the sky? Does the quail set up and whistle in a disappointed way, Or hang his head in silence and sorrow all the day? Is the chipmunck’s health a failure? Does he walk or does he run? ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 159 Is there anything the matter with the rooster’s lungs or voice? Ort a mortal be complainin’ when dumb animals rejoice? Then let us one and all be contented with our lot; The June is here this mornirg and the sun is shining hot. Oh! let us fill our heads up with the glory of the day, And banish ev’ry thought and care and eobrow far away! Whatever be our station, with Providence for guide, Such fine circumstances oughi to make us satisfied; For the world is full of roses, and the roses full ofdew, And the day is full of heavenly love that drips for me and you.” Let us introspect and see if we have done all that we can to make the farm a success. Our children will be content with us. It is a good sign to see a boy love home—boith for the boy and the home. ‘The golden city will then lose its so-called attraction. We sometimes wonder how long the farm will continue to feed this modern minatour which requires its yearly tribute. Then with this motto, that greatness in character not circumstances. “Let us rise for the day is passing, And we are dreaming on, The others have buckled their armor and Torth to the fight have gone.’ A place in the ranks awaits us, Each man has some part to play. The play and the future are nothing In the face of stern today.” Opportunity is passing with broad charity reaching for the higher education of love and light. Right thoughts and action will foilow, suc- cess in your day willcome. Nowis a mighty word. Maybe we, like the great men and women who live and have lived, whose lives are a sweet incense brewing upon times’ altar, and we will earnestly labor for our homes and those wnom God has given us. Tell me, gentie traveler, who has’t wandered through the world and 160 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. seen the sweetest roses bloom and brightest gliding river, of thine eyes have seen, which is the fairest land‘? Child, shall I tell thee where nature is most blest and fair? It is where love abides. Though that space be small, ample it is above king- doms; though it be a desert, through it runs the river of paradise and there are the enchanted bowers. Duet by Hon. Jules Lumbard and Mr. Bagley. Encored. By the President:—I understand the Committee on Resolutions are reaay to report. Resolutions read by Mr. Caven. Mr. Long Chairman of Committees. Whereas, An effort is now being made by the dairy industry of the United States, through the National Dairy Union, to secure the enactment of a national oleomargarine law which will prevent the fraudulent sale of oleomargarine for butter and will compel oleomargarine manufactur- ers and dealers to sell their product for what itis; and, . Whereas, Experience has sho wn that state laws are inadequate to deal with this fraud; and Whereas, An anti-color lawis the ouly law that will be effective to prevent the fraudulent sale of oleo margarine for butter; therefore, beit Resolved, That this association recommend the passage by Congress of the Tawney-Grout oleomargarine bill (H. R. No. 4) and respectfully re- qu3st our Nepuecentaties and senators from Illinois to use every honor- able means to secure the passage of H. R. Ne 4, which places a tax of tet cents per pound on oleomargarine colored in semblance of butter, and re- moves the present tax of two cents per pound on olecmargarine inits nat- ural color. Resolved, That we endorse the work of the State Food Commission ‘n its efforts to ketter dairy conditions and]the¢ dairy industries, and we would urge upon the Commissioner the importan:: to the dairy industry of Illi- nois of securing fromthe Supreme Court of the State a decision as to tha constitutionality of the anti-color law of TJliinois. We wish to call the attention of the Food Department to the need of dairy statistics of the State, including number of cowsand value of same, list of creameries and ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 161 amount of capital invested therein, amount of butter made, both dairy and creamery and value of same, amount of butter exported, amount consum- ed at home, etc. Whereas, In the judgment of tke breeders of dairy cattle in Illinois the State Dairyman’s Association can be made of morejimportance and worth to the dairy interests of the state and Whereas, There appears to be no organization of the different breeds in the state, Resolved, The President ofthe Illinois Dairyman’s Association be re- quested to appoint one manfrom each dairy breed whose duty it shall be to endeavor to have those several breeds organized during 1902 in the State of Illinois, each to send a representative to meet with this organiza- uon at its next annual meeting, to report the success of this movement, and to act\with usin the future for the general good of the dairy interests of the state. Whereas, Illinois is oneoftheleading dairy states in the union, and dairy conditions here as elsewhere are such that they demand the atten- tion of both the producerandth2 consumer, and Whereas, We believe that a large numter of dairy cows in this state are not paying the owner in milkor butter what it costs to feed them, and that a great many dairymen donot realize the importance of weeding out poor cows, but keep them in their herds year after year at an actual loss, and, Whereas, A part of the milk produced is not up to proper standard in purity and a large share of the public does not realize the importance of pure milk, and Whereas, The manufacture of process outter has greatly increased in past years and this industry is stimulated ty the production of poor grades of butter, and, Whereas, The cheese industry is one of the most important features of the dairy vocation, andsincethe state of Illinois has sadly neglected this part of the dairy work, therefore, be it Resolved, We, the members of the Illinois State Dairyman’s Associa- 2 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. tion, ask the support of allinterested in the dairy industry of the state to co-operate with the Illinois College of Agriculture and Experiment Sta- tion in advncing the cheese industry and rectifying existing evils and in promoting the dairy business of the state to the utmost possible limit. Resolved, That we express our gratitude to both our state and nation- al government who have beenand are standing for the legislation needed for the dairy industry. We assure them that we appreciate their efforts. Resolved, That we give to Mr. Sudendorf, who is a candidate for the position of Superintendent of the dairy department of the St. Louis World’s Fair, our endorsement. We believe that he is the best man in the country for'the place and will get togetner the best possible represen- tation of dairy machinery and suppiieswand products. Resolved, That we express our thanks to the Mayor and citizens of Freeport for the favors that we have enjoyed at their hands during the con- vention. Resolved, That our thanks are extended to the railroads of the Wesi- ern Passenger Association, and es pecially to the C. & N. W. Ry. Co., the I. ©. Ry. Co., C., M. & St. P. Ry. Co., and the Great Western Railroads that enter Freeport, for the open one and one-third rate granted/for the con- vention. Resolved, That we thankthe newspapers of Freeport for the liberal notices they have given us in advertising our convention. Wethankals9o the cther newspapers of thestate that have kindly used the news matter relating to this meeting sent to them. y Resolved, That we thank W. D. Collyer, of Chicago, who judged the butter. ‘ Resolved, That we thank these who have taken part on the program of this convention, making it one of the best in the Association’s histo- ry. We are grateful to Hon. Jui¢s Lumbard, of Omaha, and F. R. Bagiey, of Chicago, who entertained us with music and Elmer Thayer, of Free- port, for readings and songs. By the President:—What wili you do with these resoluti ons? Mr. Long:—I move their aduption. ae ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 163 Mr. Nowlan:—I second the motion. By the President:—It is moved and seconded that these resolutions be adopted asread. Allin favor of that say “I.” Contrary:—It is unanimously voted that the resolutions are passed. Recitation:—By Elmer Thayer, accompanied by orchestra. Encor- ed. : ADDRESS BY MR. PATTERSON, REPRESHNTATIVE OF HON. A. H. JONES, FOOD COMMISSIONER OF ILLINOIS. By the President: The next on our program was an address by the Hon. A. H. Jones, Food commissioner, and he has sent his able represen- tative in our friend, Mr. Patterson. Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: The officers of this organization are to be highly congratulated for the excellent program thus far. In addressing this organization in be- half of the distinguished Food Commissioner, whom I represent, Mr. Jones, I have to extend his regrets for his absence, he having been called to Washington, and he sent me out here to do the bestI can. Your Chair- man said ‘“‘able representative’; cf course it is always nice to give a man a good send off. This year is certainly a good year for the interests of the dairy and creamery industry. In looking over this field, one can’t help but be im- pressed with the tremendous interests involved in the dairy industry. I want to say, before I begin a little paper I have prepared, that the resolutions just passed, we, as members of the Illinois Commission, feel highly gratified, and feel that your work and our work is practically on the same line. The resolution that said it would be well to secure all of 164 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. the data of the animals and creameries of Illinois is something we are very anxious to do. Mr. Burke, who is chief inspector, is here tonight, and we have prepared a list or a blank for names and addresses of the dairies and creameries, and we would like to get them filled out as near as we can, and ask your help in securing the addresses. This year, of course, we are unable to secure alJl of them, but by this time next year we ex- pect to have them and give themto you in our next annual report. It will be a great aid to you and those inierested in pure food. That part of the resolution that made mention of the oleo law inter- ests us all, and we have given that a great deal of attention. In Elgin last summer they tried several cases against dealers selling oleomar- garine without it being labeled and tried to get a decision, but the juries failed time and again to agree, but at last one jury agreed against us. We have two cases that we are guing to take to the supreme court, to test this oleomargarine law, and fee! confident that the supreme court will find that law good. It would bea great aid for the pure food producers in Illinois. If a man adulterates his food, let him label it as such, so that the buyer will know he is buving adulterated food. Let us label oleomargarine or anything else along that line. That is what we are mak- ing a special effort to do now. In taking the counties and the farms in Illinois and from what in- formation I could get since my appointment I have approximated that the number of cows in Illincis are 750,000. Of course that’s a great many cattle, and if properly taken care of, will be a great benefit, and that number could be increased because Illinois is a great state with broad prairies, especially adapted for the dairy industry. I want to say right herethatyou have dairies and creamerieés in IIli- nois as good as any.in the worldfrom what I know, and I am acquainted with creameries in Pennsylvania, Towa and Kansas. You are to be con- gratulated upon the work you are doing, but extend it and broaden out and join together is all that we have to do in that line and we will be surprised at the results. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 165 I understand the object and purpose of your Association is to improve and develop the dairy industry of this great State. When the magnitude of the industry is considered, itis apparent that the subject is one of the utmost importance to the people of Illinois. It can be truly said that the prosperity of the State rests largcly with you gentlemen. There are now in Illinois, for dairy purposes, approximately 759,000 cows, yielding an annual supply of nearly 350,000,0¢0 gallons of milk, from which 100,000,- 000 pounds of butier are made. This great supply of butter and milk, if equally divided among men, women and children of the State, would give to each one annually about 58 cuarts of milk and 20 pounds of but- ser. ‘These figures would indicate that the supply is not sufficient to meet the demand of its citizens without importation. The farmer who follows dairy pursuits should have to begin with ‘a dairy of good cows ana he shoula acquire the cows with the least pos- sible outlay of money. If thereis any particular breed of cows more profitable than another, it should be known to him. At the lowest esti- mate $900,000 is annually withdrawn from circulation and is expended in the purchase of cows from other States. About 70 per cent of this stock is ‘bought on credit, and the farmers therefor pay annually a large amount of money in interest. The time was, in Illinois, when the farmers practi- cally raised all of their own stock If that was done today, we chould not only have better dairies, but we would escape many dangerovs diseases which find their way through our State through the importation of stock. Through our inspection, we seek to bring about clean stables. clean milk receptacles, the general condition made better. The introduc- tion of modern scientific methods we believe will be the result of these inspections, in many instances in which they are not now in use. 1 know of no better means of bringing about improved conditions than througa ‘inspection, and it is my opinion that not only is the public health pro- tected thereby, but that the compeient, up-to-date dairyman will be zreatly benefitted thereby. I know of no up-to-date dairies who receive as wuch as 12 cents per quart for their milk from the consumer, I am 165 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. personally interested in the dairy business. I began life on the dairy farm, and I am still in the business and I expect to remain in it and do my utmost to advance the industry, in and out of office. The first work I didasaboyon s« farm for my mother was to milk eight cows a day; take them to pasture in the morning and bring them home at night. I am interested in a farm in Cook county on which there are several cows, and my brother and I are owners of a dairy at Em- poria, Kansas, where 60 cows are kept. The Food Commission thus far bas prosecuted no owner of dairy or creamery. All we desire is your co-operation in enforcing the laws. While we have not begun prosecution of any one connected with the dairy industry, the records show scores of arrests of dealers in imitation of butter, or oleomargarine in Chicago and elsewhere, and the expendi- ture of money and time in securing convictions. We believe it is of the utmost importance to protect the butter and dairy interests of this State. The fame of Illinois butter is known thé world over, and the Elgin stamp is a guarantee of an Ail butter in America, as well as in Europe. Milk depots and dairies within the city limits,of Chicago were in- spected during the last two weeks of December, and many of them were found to be very badly in need of sanitary improvements. It was dis- covered also that the ordinance of the city, prohibiting the feeding to cows vinegar slops, was being violated by scores of daries in the’city. In the city milk depots we found rusty cans, rusty on the inside as well as the outside of the can, and many cans used for garbage and such like; also mouldy and unclean wal}s and ceilings from which particles of dirt fell into the receptacles uscd for milk and cream. The most start- ling discovery was the unclean stabies and yards, lack of proper drainage, cows huddled together in very close quarters, and improper feeding! were observed. We found that there had been no inspection by the city of these places, although the inccme trom the milk depots and dairies in Chicago is over $60,000 per year. For this reason we have been very active in endeavoring to bring about a better condition in the city of Chicago. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 167 I believe the future of the dairy industry of this State is exceedingly bright. There are great opportunities to advance this industry in Illinois. It is my opinion that much of the scil that is now occupied in raising crops could ke used to a much better advantage in dairy farming. The seeding of the land for year after vear for nearly a century has a ten- dency to make it poor, but this land could be easily transformed into ex- cellent dairy pasture which would improve the soil. Dairymen should co-operate and stand together and demand better prices for their product. You should join with your neighbors and buy in carload lots and save from two-to four dollars per ton on feed. I am free to say that the dairy farmers should: have net, above freight, one-half of the retail price to the consumer. The middle man has generally the better part of the busi- ness on milk products. With my experience, if I had to take the low -price prevailing for the past few years for milk in Chicago, I should be very much inclined to let the other fellow do the producing and I would do the selling and the money making. People are beginning to appre- ciate the value of the dairy products, and I believe there is a much better day ahead forthe dairyman. Let your association forge ahead with the wave of prosperity. There is need of more practical education for our country boys. especially inthe dairy farming industry; an education which will not only prepare them for farm life, but at the same time awaken within them great respect, for their calling. The mechanic is taught manual training; the engineer surveying: the soldier military tactics; the doctor physics; the lawyer jurisprudence; the preacher the- ology; and the banker bookkeeping und banking—all these are educated and equipped for their special lines of endeavor, but the farmer boy is turned loose in the broad open field to work out Lis own salvaticn in the great workshop of nature, handicapped by the lack of knowledge of the soil and its capabilities. It is my cpinion that the farming chemistry should be taught in the country sckcol districts. The farm boy should know more about plant life and its relation to the soil, and the future dairymen should understand thoroughly all the questions bearing upon 168 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. the treatment of a cow, such as pasturage and the character of food neces- sary to enable her to produce,as well as the most improved methods of handling the milk and preparing it for the market. A new interest should be revived in dairy industries; go where you will among the farming community and you will’hear nothing but words of! condemnation. That most honorable of all industries, the one upon which our ances- tors built the foundations of our government, and which for more than a hundred years. has been its mainstay and support, is today without scarcely a friend in this, whole lane to speak a good word in its defense. Abuse after abuse has been heaped upon this greatest of all industries, by the very people who should defend it, so that today the sons and daughters of the farmers are fleeing from: their country home to take their chances of gaining a less honorable livelihood in the workshops) and . crowded thoroughfares of cur large cities. While farm values have shrunk and social structure of our country life are almost destroyed and the lands, which a generation ago, were the hope and pride of our ances- tors, are now occupied by renters Why should not the owner of the farm remain upor it and make the home a bright and happy one, and teach his. children the dignity and advantage of farm life? The wealth of our great nation was acquired from the soil and from their products it has been maintained ail the years of its existence. The country districts have furnished men to us like Li::coln, Logan, Yates, and Grant. These men came from/the farm and had’ the: brains to mculd the nation’s future and they placed this country in the) front ranks of the nation of the world, and the country nome has ever been the embodiment of comfort and happi- ness, its purity of character and love of virtue has always embellished the lives of its sons and daughters. With the permission of the Chairman I would like to have Mr. Burke epeak to you a little while on our idea of inspection. I thank you. ee, ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 169 BY MR. BURKE, AURORA, ILLINOIS Ladies and Gentlemen: I have been requested to give ycu some idea of how the State Focd Commissioners intend to inspect the creameries. In that request is em- braced a wish to have me read some of thereports. I have2number here, but your Chairman has very kindly stated that I can’t have all night, so will call your attention tosome paris of\them. The State Food Commission is composed of the commissioner, two assistants, Mr. Patterson the dairy man, and a chemist and _ six in- spectors. First’ of all I wish to call your attention to the fact that if they have ten inspectors to inspect milk depots in Chicago under the city ad- ministration, six inspectors is rather a small number for the great State of Illinois. We have found this te be so and are cramped to a great degree in the matter. The State Food Law ig one of the best laws upon the statute books, and the people of Illinois will take more interest in it and aid the com- mission before many years. Of course, it is not well for us to advocate more inspectors and we are not dcing it, but are doing the best we can, and when you understand what the duties of the inspectors are you will be surprised we are doing as well as we are. It requires the inspec- tion of'all the creameries—and there are somewhere near 690 in the state; it requires the inspection of all the milk depots, not alone in Chicago but in every city in the state; all the dairies on farms and in the city; all the restaurants, hotels, and infact ,everywhere where food is sold or given out tothe public. Thisisa tig affair, and to say that six inspec- tors are adequate to do all that work, is saying a great deal; but, asl said before, we are doing’ the best we can. The State Food Law is specific in soma of its provisions and some not specific. The law says what you shall do and what you shall not do, of course that:is clear and defined. The section pertaining to the sanitary 170 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. conditions of creameries, requires the commissioner to present to the governor at least once a year, the sanitary conditions of all the cream- eries in the state. We found that was impossible. Of course in its na-~- ture, it is a police system, and some of the people feel as if one of' Pin- kerton’s detectives were after them. But that is! not the desire of the commission. We don’t want the creamery men to think so for/a min- ute. When! we go to the creameries, what we want is to have a friendly chat concerning: the condition of the creamery, and any suggestions we can recommend, or any suggestions‘they can recommend tous we would be glad to havethem. After we have gone, accept our suggestions in a friendly way and fix' up, as you wil! tind it is to your interestrto do so in the end. We report the creamery as either good, fair, poor, very bad. I find that this is the method of inspection in other states, and we did that, but finally we have decided to make sy erie specific or more detailed report in regard to creameries. I might say right here that a great deal of complaint hag been made by people that are interested in this work, ask- ing me why we don’t prosecute the unsanitary creameries and close them up. You know a good many of the creameries in this state, their build- ings are old, farm buildings, that have been running along for a great many years, and while the creamery people on the whole have met ina friendly way after they have found out our idea, we desire' to educate them to it. In this blessed day of ,-rosperity they find it better to sell all the milk they getand not manufacture it. They say they are nct getting much for their milk and can’t ix up. We find the condition of the buildings on the inside so tliat they will have to have time to fix them up. It would not be fair to jump con them right away. This law, as I said, compels the commissioner to present his report once a year. It does not say what is meant by “sanitary conditions,” that is left to the judgment of the commissioner. It seems to me that they wisely left that question to be filled in-by the inspectors. Tiey have not adopted a standard; they couid have adopted the opinion of one ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. E7t man what should be considered the sanitary condition of a creamery, but they have judiciously left that open, but after a while there will be a standard established and then every creameryman will have to live up to it. We wish, therefore, to meet all the creamery people in a friendly way and friendly spirit, and not in the spirit of detective force or need of con- viction. As; Mr. Fatterson has told you, we have not made any prosecu- tions whatever, and we do not intenc to do so at present. It is only fair to give the creameryman timetofix up his creamery, and to meet usina friendly way, but after a while we will have to act in our official cr police capacity, and in case the sanitary conditions are not up to standard, rey will have to be prosecuted. Such a course is only fair to the cream- eryman who does keep his creamery clean. It was given out some time ago that the creameries of the state were ina filthy condition. Now that was very unfortunate, but I have nottime to go into this question. But I wish.to say that the creameries of Illinois, particularly those in the northern part, are not ina filthy condition. Some of them are fair, some of them are poor, not up to what we call good sanitary condition. and a great many are in excellent condition. I will read this report I have here and you will get an idea from this of our method of inspection. | Report of Freeport Creamery: Ordinary squared built brick dwelling house with a brick addition; outside in goed condition; yard made of cinders, thoroughly packed andhard; yard scrupulously clean, evidence enue it had beenswept; building ou the corner of the street in the center of the city; cement walks on twe sices. Receiving room lined with pine matched boards painted dark color; walk and ceiling clean and in gond condition. Three full windows, clean. and in good condition, give good light: wood floor, four feet below the sur- face of the ground, still damp but clean and in good condition, cement under wood and cinders’ under the cement. Receiving vat five feet fromthe floor; wood work clean and in good , 172 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. condition; tin old and partly worn off, but clean and in fairly good condi- tion. The receiving platform is a shelf made of pine matched boards in the corner of the room, wood floor quite old, but fairly clean; can old; tin worked off, but clean on the: inside;'* valve clean; scales fair. Around the wall to a height of four feet is a wood wainscoting; wood work is in good condition, freshly painted red. On two sides of the room, directly over this wainscoting runs a narrow platform to walk on. This plat- form is thoroughly scrubbed and in excellent condition. Skim milk tank of galvanized iron; seis on floor near the separator. Milk is pumped/from. this tank tc a washer in the side cf the room and from there to the out- side where is is received by the patrons. Everything about this ‘Skim milk tark is clean and in good condition. Churn room is in cellar of the dwelling house; the walls are plastered and freshly ‘whitened, ceiling in excellent condition; wood floor on cinder founda- tion, clean and in good condition; square box churn in fairly good condi- tion. Engine in good condition anc in this room. The cream room is a separator room built ia the center of. tne churn room; the walls made of matched pine boards, ceiling matched pine boards all freshly painted and in excellent condition. Wood floor inclined enough to keep the water constantly running to the drain in the center of the floor. This room has one-half window which affords fair light; the wood fioor is on cement:foundation. The cream vat is 20 inches from the floor; wood work fair; tin fair; refrigerator in the end of this cream room, made of pine matched boards, wocd floor; air spacein wall; this in end of room is freshly painted, wood work dry and in excellent condition. The boiler and engine are in a separate building in the rear of the dwelling house; the boiler is bricked up and in good condition; engine is in fairly good condition. Water obtained from drilled well 76 feet deep; temperature 52 de- grees. Condition of milk fair, average test 4 per cent. Everything about ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. ter this creamery, notwithstanding the fact that it is partly located in the cellar, indicates care on the part of the) man in charge to keep every- thing clean and in good condition. There is no evidence of any damp- ness or mouldiness on the wood work because it is kept painted; and it is evident that while there is no direct ventilation that the windows are- kept open at the proper time and every care taken to keep the place ven- tilated and clean; and thereiis no smell. We find that this inspection goes into detail more than any other state. This year we are not givirg the name of the owner, but the name of the creamery. In this we report we head it Freeport creamery, and: tell who owns it farther down. I have a great many other reports here. some not as good as that. Mr. Hostetter to the President:-—Ask him to read the poorest report.. The President:—I think it best not to at present. I want to say that. the creamery men in the Elgin district are perfectly willing to go heart. and soul into this work of weeding out the poor, dirty, filthy creameries.. I for one want to see them weeded cut, and they should be, and we will stand back of' the Food Commissioners if they go on in the way they have commenced. If the creameries are in bad condition, the creamerymen ought to knowit. Wewantour buttermakers and creamerymen who are: back of us to look out for this work. ‘They are liable to fines as well as we are. I dondt think itis a good thing to go to work at this present time and publish all the poor ones. If by next season they continue bad, Wwe may want to take other steps. But the bulk of our creameries are in good condition, and we should let it go out to the world that the IIli-- nois creameries are in good condition. Mr. Burke:—Your President has the same opinion as the commission- ers. We are going along in this work and doing it cautiously, giving the dairymen and creamerymen a chance to fix up. The reason I read this report to! you tonight was to give you/an idea of how we report the conditions of the creameries. We are not prepared at present to gointo: , details on the construction and techuical part of creameries. We have 174 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. found in some creameries the cream room is dark so that you can hardly see the vat, and he will have the windows closed and so dirty you jan’ see through them. It isn’t built right, but while our jurisdiction may not go to the construction of the building, only! the sanitary conditions, it does go into the construction of the building and the arrangement of the place where it prevents good sanitary conditions. Where we find vats only two inches from the floor and pot thoroughly cleaned, we want it raised and cleaned. Where we find the floor so water congregates in the center, we don’t want the cream vat put on the floor where the sewerage runs under them. Where the shaft and pulley and hangers are set di- rectly over a creamery receiving vat, we would like to have that removed. When construction and allthese things have been gone over and everything said about it, I have ccime to this conclusion in my short in- spection of creameries: The most prominent factor in the creamery is the man who does the cleaning. [ find a difference in men. One man can go over his creamery and explainit al} to me and the other man don’t seem to have the knack ofstudying it at all. Some men have a natural knack of details, and a manthat has none never can make a clean cream- eryman in my opinion. Hehas got to study details, and be methodical, and when things are once cleaned, keep them clean. I have also found men of this sort: They will walk around and splash around and keep the water running all the time. I found in these places that that was the way they cleaned, let the water run all the time. I went and took up the cover to the drain and would find it dirty all around the sides, not corroded, but the dirt had not been removed in some time. He had an idea‘in thoroughly washing with waterthat was sufficient. He had not studies the idea of scrubbing the drain. He said it didnot smell. In other creameries I have found such drains scrupulously clean. In regard to wood floors, we don’t commend wood floors, and if they have them they must keep them clean. Some men don’t let the water brush, and when he: gets througk that floor is dry. Another man’s place run al! the time, and yet their filcors are clean. They use a mop and a ILLINOIS STATE LAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 175 was visited at five in the afternoon, when the work is done. Hisifloor was on the pine order, built below the surface of the ground, windowsi were down, but floor was still wet. He was the kind that flushed water so hard; it is the peculiarity of the man. What the commission wants is to have them pay more attention to the sanitary part of the cramery. In going through some of these piaces we have said it seemed that any old thing in the line of sanitation would do. We want the co-operation of the creamerymen inthis matter. Do not suppose to drive you to the wall, nothing of the kind. It is not a hard matter to make a standard in regard to cleaniiness. Thatstardard will be raised and we shall expect every creamery to come up to that standard. Now in regard totheowner. I find this kind ofanowner: Iasktosee the vat and he will tell me he is gcing to have a new one in the spring. Tell him his wooden floor is eld, worn out, and he tells me he is going to have a nice cement floor. He wili go on and detail all these things to me, if I notice the deficiencies. Another man meets me. “‘Hcw’s Burke?” “How did you find my place out there?” I will tell him what was needed to be done there and he will say, “Why, is that so?” I tell him his floor is pretty well rotted out and his answer will be, ‘‘Why, you don’t say so. I mustsee | Jim about that.’ I just tell you these little things to show you how we are met by some of the owners. I think when:a man has studied details, he has learned a very good moral iesson of taking his faults and blame upon his own shoulders, and it has been my experience, when you find a man willing to take the blame upon himself, he is going to improve mighty fast. The one man isa good, happy-go-lucky kind of a_ fellow, who depends on Jim, and if he hagn’t a good Jim, he will be in trouble alt the time. What we want to bring to the attention of the owner is that he must study these conditions'as well. Some of them never stop to think of the sanitary part of their creamery; but will wear a pencil out figur- ing on the money end of the busiress. Now, gentlemen, I have talked longer than I intended to. Thisisa very great question, ard | want to state again to you Mr. President, that 176 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. the commissioner wants your assistance. Here’s another thing; in your resolution you say you want to get statistics. We have sent out to get statistics. Wesent blanks by mail, asking for kind of creamery, amount of milk, butter, and where shipped to, number of patrons, and out of probably one hundred sent out we would get but 20 returned. I want to ask all who have received these blunks to fill them out and return them to us. Ond man said: “I can fill this blank out all but two things, the amount of milk and the butter I got iast year, that would take me a week to figure that up.” Thatis the condition of affairs that we find. There seems to be no complete books. If I wanted an accurate account of but- ter and milk I would have to leave it with him and he promised to send it by next mail; but they, never'do. Weare willing and anxious to get. all those statistics and will do so, but we must have the help of the dairy- men. Some of the men don’t’ want it known how much milk and butter they get, and I wish totell them that it will never be known. Itis not'go- ing to be published as irdividuals, and the amount from any one creamery, but the totals of butter and milk and where shipped is what we are after, the same as your resclution asked for tonight. I thank you.. By tha President:—We had hupe«d to have ex-Governor Hoard with us this evening, but on account of heing called to Washington to help Mr. Knight, it is impossible for bini to be here. He was one of the shin- ing lights on the program, and I am sorry to pass it by. We will finish our program tonight with asongby Mr. Bagley. Song by Mr. Bagley. By the President:—Don’t forget to go to Machinery Hall tomorrow. We have an invitation from the Stover Manufacturing Company, between 10 and 11 tomorrow. We also have two boxes of last year’s report. Take one home with you and study it ard it will help you. We will now listen to the butter scores. BUTTER SCORES READ BY MR. CAVEN, SECRETARY. These scores show the extreme, some are high and some are low. Some are low on account of very oor flavor. Thisis particularly true ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. E77 on the dairy entries. Thescoresare low; on them. The reason is that nearly all the persons making dairy butter send only one or two pounds, or just asmallamount. After it has been transported some distance and it stands in the express office for a little while, and tren stands around a day or two, there is sucha small amount of butter and so much surface exposed that it does not hoid its favor very long. If the packages were larger that would keep their flavor better. I will read the creamery scores first. BUTTER AND CHEESE SCORES. Name. Address. Score. Pepe EOM... 2... ee eee PiGtay MIG seo nn fs) o's yard = ae un eee 92 a Onrantse ville. BUS. sso sates. 2 a er ee 92 a San, VPLS. ..5 43 Sa who nie wets eae oe 931% SUPT fiw cc tk ce we we INRCOLETE NINOS sa'n 8552s woe hoo 8514 Poe ePeCDretsen .............. Mansfield, Minn. ........ Not eee 92 eet POTION 2... ee Pe BEM! ATI ss 2s. ois atete 3 slate eee Canes 92 Ee Blanchardville, Wis... jicctee felocd: 91 ea yel s =... wt ee eee NVimSlow, Gules: SSeS awe eto ee 86 Memese City Co. ..'...... ene ait Pelion LIBS. . S fe rale a endke Clare Ste 94 NO es es ce es Woe Wee, Sst ae as 98 A PPaTee Lisiohe sa on stale ede Oe cree 91% eee P VOUMSION: . .. 505 5 5 is ee oe ae Boplar.- Grove, ls... 22 5. erties bees 93 eee BEATE MONOTMCW . 2... ee cee Cedaeville,” isa. «. ic cee ane fade 8814 OT a stevens. LISS 2 i vic k [all's Wale wala el aire 91 Cl SG) sugar Groves IMs. oo... ae Scere 90 a Eg SS ee Hoek Grove: (Hsy «codec owe t Dee =e tare 8814. aisrave I TUCMPEel .. 2... ww ewes Etankfont Station. DIs.. ... . 426s 921% SM 6... es cece bee Shabliotia, [lls. o-oo eee 92 M. J. Mansager ................. BIB WOTLO, Laie... 6 & © :—Yes, sir; you feed her and she will always be ready for milk- ing. You keep the cow up in good conditicn and she will be in shape to do business; thatisa great point in dairying. Q:—Any experience in feeding ensilage? A:—Our factory don’t allow us to feed ensilage. A:—Can’t feed ensilage or gluten meal. Our feed is largely corn meal and bran. Q:—Any oats? A:—We usually sell the oats and buy bran. Q:—Do you think ensilage taints the miik? A:—Had no experience. Q:—Do you. grind your cornfine or coarse? A:—Fine. Q:—Ever mix cob with th? corn meal? A:—Trying it this winter. Everyone fed sheiled corn, but this’ winter trying tre cob meal. @:—I have had experience and have fed it for years. A:—That’s what we are doing this winter, owing to the high price OI pran. Q:—How much do you feed your cows each day? A:—When tie dairy is ‘on fll feed, about 20 pounds per cow. Q@:—How much milk from your best cows on 20 pounds of grain 2 daz 7! A:—Take tke dairy, they should average a can to three cows during the milking sea-:on, say for ten months. Q:—Ahbout 22 pounds to acow? A:—Considerable more than that, as through the first half of the milking Season we often getacan from two and one-half cows, some- times a little better. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 235 Q:—Do you get enough more milk to pay for the extra feed? Will a cow give you 18 pounds of miik on 10 pounds of grain? A:—There may be a way of getting something for nothing, but I have never found how in the dairy business. Q:—If you get 18 pounds of milk from 10 pounds of grain, would you be losing? A:—I have always fed that way: it has been my observation and ex- perience, that the liberal feeders were the most successful. If you could make 18 pounds of milk from 10 pounds of grain, you certainly would not pe a loser. Q:—How do you keep up the fertility of your soil if you sell your milk? A:—Careful farming, good crops, keeping the fatm heavily stocked will increase the fertility of the soil. Q:—How long do you keep the same cows on your farms? A:—Some of them we donot keep a gieat while; change perhaps 25 per cent of them a year. Q:—How long do you keep vou good cows? A:—As long as there is a gwiod profit. A cow will wearoutthesame | as a machine. Q:—The harder you work her the quicker she gives out? A:—I say when the profit gives out she gives out fer me. @:—Do you buy your cows? A:—Yes, sir; I let theother fellow raise them and I can buy them for less value than i can raise them. Q:—You get beat sometimes ? A:—One will get beat some“imes at almost anything. Q:—How do you like shock corn? A:—One feed a day will make the cows do better; it makes & change and is relished by them. Q:—How many pounds of milk'in a can? A:—68. C:—How many stalks to a hill did you get on that corn? 236 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. A:—Two or three. Q:—Maike it for the purpose of fodder, not corn? A:—Two will make more :orn. Q:—Do you, shred your corn fodder? A:—Cut it, cutter and thresher combined. @:—Do you raise the corn for the corn and fodder both? A:—We raise it for the corn and fodder both. @:—Don’t you raise it for the milk ration to? A:—Yes, sir. Have to be careful in getting it up, and then we stack it generally, thrash and feed it. A cow will like it fresh. We don’t cut up a lot of it at once, but keep it fresh, and we thrash that andj then, grind the grain as fine as possible. Then we have mixed it with bran, same weight; light bran, the iighter the better. , Q:—Do you get any better results from shredded corn fodder than corn stalks? A:—No. Q:—What time do you cut your corn? A:—When it is ready to cut; when it is glazed like, about the first of September. 7 Q:—What do you say should be the state of the corn? A:—When it is glazed over and commenced to harden up or dent. @:—Do you let it stand as Jate as you can before frost? A:—Yes, sir. or it should be in the shock before frost or before it dries up. Q:—Ever use much oats? A:—Never used many oats. Q:—They are selling bran $20.00 a ton? A:—Yes, I know it. Q:—How many kernals, did you say to the hill on your corn? A:—Two or three. Q:—How many cows to the acre around Elgin? A:—Vary a good deal. I keep on one of my farms 50 head of cattle on 110 acres; that is arented farm. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 237 .Q:—Do you cut up yourcorn and pvt it in the barn? A:—We put it in large shocks. We get it in the stacks all we can’t feed before the first of January. Q:—How do you stack it? A:—Round stacks 4 or 5 loads, or in ricks. Some folks think fod- der is not good if kept overa year. I have threshed them the next year and gone up a cS ise’ nao. habeslol Men aye are» uninin le ions o¥qieom tlaleiaie © So 25.00 SRL Sl oo ol No te Mc my at Sohateh tbls» wie a emia) piaioserend $216.34 UC IENN CRS haf ek, ar ot wk o's bin Rida aie eue © «a 4 3. elubaiele, aay a’e 211.60 NE ie a BS od es eal are g ao nrever O'S oye,8 64s. Be Speen 4.74 Several bills still outstanding and the fact that only half the Secre- tary'’s salary for the year had been paid, lert a deficit of about $150.00. 248 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. SECRETARY’S REPORT. Receipts. Balance Tram VOUT e ee. Pace wide occas” in onaip. o nlclan ee eoet grea senna aa $ 29.68 Chil (ol. Oe ee er rc a er ok Rae An werner 50.00 Micim DETSINS oc Aise 0m sewie sects vee Nane oo ORM es Wie Be ee ee 160.00 PTCMONt BuUeler Dw WG. asc 5 sc wide Hares. 6 hele vty shone ae ote 5.00 Winnebago. Butter Manufacturing Co.....7).c..<..0n eee 5.00 J. Po Younger (CORUrIDUCIONS ) oo 5 4 cs 5 uuc's esse enc'p c's de 0 bg 60.00 Hotel Brewster ...... ee Ee 25.00 De ‘Laval Separator ‘Co.'s. = sae dd Sd atti a ea 30.00 Hilgin Butter Tub Co. eee Skee ns eee Bae eee 10.00 Diamond Crystal Salt-Cor oe oiis Jw Slate Bee « 5, cieteys oc »- 10,00 .. D..Moulton &:Co (Ashton & Carditlae Salts) 3). o.rc0s.ceeee 3:0 habe 10.00 Jairy:. Mutual Tnistirance Cas oso sce ae ois Git veo cotta aie 10.9 Worchester “Salt? CO 3.575. %he viele aided whee ne We ele ae ga ean ee 10.09 The’ Sharples: vCO. Josue sateen ecanece dwneie aia come Or 10.009 Girésee Salt.Co. a has ee ae eae ee beets thee cette eee e eee teeeee 10.00 Vermont Farm Machine ‘Co™ 4..<).)..6).'s Sea. sag.i8) cite whee 10.00 Aa EY Barber Ceo is © iis a pie taistend he bb de Wha tapeltesae ms oie ie mae 10.0€ Wells, michardson COs t% ak pte. cara «bogs salve; 2. eae 25.90 Jolin” Newman (CO... 3. Ane soi sie ene wines 9 an eeniare 5 w/o 6 alse 25.00 Helier” EeNGOTZ NOOR ee Oh Saisie wlena Foca pee Dcsles iat poy lane 25.00 Creamery’ Package Manufacturing Company .....¢..+... ae 50.00 PESO TL og aie, o neces erty e fe ue fos he dered SER GERN a RRR Wa ati sacle altars "ofa to 0 Mar te $579.68 DSHCit Mawes sah nee es Sr oe aay Set See, 8 «1s, 0 6.9 kets take nn 31.50 $611.18 Expenses. Stamnes.) ite At a Se ei oa) el Ue $ 42.50 Pizpress; drayage, frei nts.. hoes cheb ofeve pores. oatade relies to eee 8.35 Telephones ‘and “telegrams, 0553. 82% bod od Waal, poset en 2.50 Secretary, railroad and. total-exp' enses.... 2.5... 2. .02 055 Gia ee 42.77 Printing,’ binding; folding, addressing, -etc...,.2. 4%. vee » Caan Mailing reporters sh.5\ ative os bugserace fois nei foo note clege atau edielte ooh nn 37.50 Paid: “TYegsurercse thot was eer ey cma e sch tebiptecs b’bla a praises 140.00 Convention CXPSTIBES so sicdjoc0 Voce ek eie’s ole oratinee yee ot ateke ng . 272.25 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 249 Had the contribution from Fi eeport been as large as expected, the de- ficit would have been about $100 less. After approving the reports, the directors appointed F. A. Carr and G. H. Gurler a committee to arrange a plaai whereby, in the future, all the money received by the secretary would go to the treasurer before being paid out, instead of being paid out as needed to meet the expenses of an annual convention. The idea was to, in the future, have all the receipts from every source show the treasurer’s report. The printing of the annual re port was left with the president and sec- retary. President Newman made a verbal report on a sub-meeting of dairy- mer held at Elgin. Extreme weather conditions prevented this meeting from being a success. A committee of three was ordered to be appointed by the said meeting to revise the rules under which the association is working and report at the next meeting of the boara. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, Jan. 6-7-8, 1903, were the days decided upon for the next annual convention of the association. The place of meeting was left in the hands of a committee consisting of F. A. Carr, Irvin Nowlan and thesecreiary. This committee has since decided te bold the convention at the new agricultural college, Universi- ty of Illinois, Champaign. It is hoped tht this will prove an attractive place of meeting and draw a large attendance of dairymen of the state. Judging of cows and practical demonstration in the College Creamery will be unusual and valuable features of the program. H. H. Hopkins, Hinckley, was re-elecie] treasurer, and George Cav- en, Chicago, was re-elected secretary. REPORT ON UNIVERSITY WORK. A valuable report at the Rockford mesting was made by Irwin Now- ' lan, of Toulon, on work along dairy lines, being done by the State Dairy 250 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Schcol, University of Illinois. > It will bs remembered that the advisory committee appointed by President Newman, when this work was taken up, consisted of H. B. Gurler, DeKaib, John Stewart, Elburn, M. Long, Wood- stock, Irwin Nowlan, Toulon, and A. N. Abbott, Mcrrison. This was an advisory committee to confer with the Dean of the Agricultural College on work to be carried on in the dairy school. Mr. Nowlan’s report is on the work of the committee andis as follows: Toulon, Ill., April 2d, 1902. Mr. Geo. Caven, 154 Lake St., Chicago, II]. My Dear Sir—I am now prepared to submit the following report as to the inducements offered by the State Agricultural College, Urbana, to hold the next meeting of theIllinois State Dairymen’s Association at that place tst. The hall for general meetings heated and lighted, free. 2d. Butter room, cold storage for the butter. sd. Room for exhibiting dairy machinery and power for operating same. 3 ‘ 4th. Use of stock judging room along with the dairy animals of the herd. : core As toacontrib tion from the two towns, Iam sorry to say that such a thing is about impcssible. Yours, Irvin Nowlan. Also find enclosed report of work done in the dairy section of the Agricultural College under Sec. 5, House Bill 315. REPORT OF WORK DONE IN THE DAIRY SECTION OF HOUSE BILI.. No. 315 BY IRVIN NOW LAN, TOULON, ILL. in carrying out the provision of House Bill 315, providing for a com- mittee of five (5) to be appointed by the iiiinois State Dairyman’s Asso- ciation to confer with the directors of the Agriculture Experiment Sta- ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 251 tion, the following committee was appointed: Messrs. H. B. Gurler, De Kalb, M. Long, Greenwood, A.W. Abbott, Union Grove, Irwin Nowlan%*, Touion, John Stewart, Elburn. At the meeting held at the Agricultural College June 18, 1901, all mem- bers were present except Mr. Stewart. Thz committee invited Profes- sors Frazer and Erf to meet with them to discuss the dairy conditions of the maieeand to jointly devise some ways and méans to improve these conditions. Upon invitation Prof. Fraser presented some suggestions as to what ought to be done in the way of developing the animal side of the dairy industry, and what investigation s ought to be carried out in this line. The work agreed upon in connection with this department of the col- lege was as follows, given in order of importance: (1.) That a man under theconirol of the Directors of the Experi- mental Station be sent over the state to do field work, with a view of studying the dairy conditions'and assist in every possible manner to improve those conditions. It was suggested by Mr. Abbott and agreed upon by all members of the commitiee that the greter portion of this work be carried on in the dairy districts of the state. (2.) That the dairy experiments at present carried on by the Exper- iment Station ini regard to determining the difference in efficiency of indi- vidual cows be continued on U.S. Government Fund. (3.) That a cheap and effective method be devised for keeping flys from cows. (4.) To determine how small a quantity of milk on which calves can be successfully reared and what food will make the best substitute for milk. ‘ (5.) 'The immediate and continued effect of different quantities of the same kind, of feed on the production of milk of cows. (6.) Wide vs. narrow rations for dairy cows and to determine the widest ration most economical for conditions that exist in Illinois. The investigation and experiment work on the manufacturing side 22 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. under Prof. Erf was given due consideration and.the following suggestions in order of importance were agreed upon. (7.) Experiments on whipping cream explaining why some cream whips, while other cream of the same per cent. does not. (8.) Testing different insulations for creamery refrigerators. (9.) Experiments on mold in :efrigerators. (10.) Experiments to determine the svecies of bacteria that causes butter to deterioate at low temperature. (11.) Experiments in making butter from cream that has been fro- zen. Such was the work mapped out by the advisory board and it is with fel- ing of pride I make report of the progress that has been made in this de- partment. One of the mast neglected things about dairy farms is the sanitary conditions of the barns, and it was thought best that the Uni- versity of Illinois set an examplein this respect for the dairymen of the State by putting the dairy barns at the experimene station in the best possible condition. uN) The floor, joists and siils ofthe University airy barn were badly rotted and unsafe for longer use, then it was thought best to tear out the whole inside of the dairy barn, new sills were put in where needed, the loft supporters on iron collums, new windows put in giving four times the light originally. The barn was ceiled on the inside, a large feed room par- ‘tioned off at one end for the preparation of feed for experimental pur- poses, at the other end a milk room, an office and a herdsman’s room were put in. A cement floor and mangers were put in three feet lower than the old floor and resting on the ground. Considerable time was spent in- vestigating the stall question and it was finally decided by putting in the Drown iron stall. These stalls were the second lot manufactured and they are giving excellent satisfaction. This makes a good barn for experimental work and with the small dairy building standing near it which has also been remodeled makes * ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 253 one of the best of the dairy plants in the state from a sanitary standpoint. The work in the field is being done by Mr. Glover in the dairy sec- tion. He is testing herds as follcws, visiting each every seventh week: MENGE PADCUUUD 5s oc bce e cece ablabmcvewleseev me 65 cows tested Ene Gr (TCCTUWOOG.. 2.02. cca cel cee eesawecsweweue’e 25 cows tested TER 5 5 5k 5 ev oon vik Dicarvtere & loole do bw one aces 30 cows tested eONUMOEOASTCORWOOU 2.4.0.6 ce cece eke ce se ce cva suees 30 cows tested NRE EIDE VI CENOD «o.oo. rll as si eewedee nce sede 18 cows tested MMMEREDOCIOPOT., 55. ccc. evn le does se caceesece cvsaes 18 cows tested Chas. SO PATON EO os wae cee cee Cen hewe ke 6 10 cows tested. S. Seward, Marengo.. ‘ i Se ee SA ever arco Perthacte es Geeks edie 6 cows tested Meemretrer, Mt. Carroll... oi 6 pc ece ae cece ece eee 20 cows tested H. M. Phillips, Lena ASE occ TER eT roti Camis 20 cows tested DMEM TIGINASCUS...... 0... occ e eee ene ves Ape pe SE 15 cows tested. E. G. Helin, PPMP eee NS yn ch ah ansliaar a Gwin wed mates ws Pee 6 cows tested TIER UTS. 5 5 he a iele a nice cgi bee tnd ne ve sues ee! ans 7 cows tested em ecarond, GENOA .......0...6 0. eee es eee OE COALIEY 6 cows tested Sener WOOUStOCK. <0... ee ce ce cece ween wees’ .30 cows tested oS 0 She i er PLA ae catia raters 10 cows tested UT Eas... we occ ccc secede dypuslbacne es 9 cows tested H. J. Younger, Stillman Valley..... Rone Snide Cisse hen, Sioa .30 cows tested Making a total of 355 cows being tested without any expense to the owners excepting what little time reauired to weigh the milk, etc. This method of testing cows every seventh week by arepresentative of the experiment station cannot help but add untold benefit to the dairy industry of the state. Applications have been coming in from dairymen to Mr. Glover totest their herds that many have had to be refused on ac- count of lack of time. Thus the light is breaking upon the dairymen, that to be sucessful in his business he must know his individual cows so that the poor cows may be weeded out, this is perhaps cne of the most important matters to be considered by the up-to-date dairyman. 24 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Experiment No. 2 is being continued on United States funds. Experiments Nos. 3 toll with no definite results as yet. The matter of whipping cream at different per cents of butter fat, and at different degrees of temperature and different per cents of acidity has been taken up, a number of data have been obtained but on account of the intricate factor of viscosity which «nters into the work there will be some problems that cannot be solved except by vely expensive and elab- orate experiments. Refrigeration has been duly considered and approximate estimates were made as to the probable cost of such an experiment in order to se- cure such results that may be helpfui to the average dairyman and still stay within reasonable bounds of our appropriations. Unforseen circumstances do occasionally arise in experimental work and it often becomes very expensive to avoid the obstacle but trusting “that nothing of the kind will arise and with well laid plans to make a thorough test of all factors that enter into this work, but it will require considerable time if the experiment is to be conducted on a thorough and economical manner, this will be especially true of the deterioration test of different insulating materiais. | Such has been the progress of the work done by the dairy department of the Agricultural College upon the plans laid out by the Advisory Board Respectfully submitted. IRVIN NOWLAN. Corn Silage &s, Shock Corn for Beef Pro= | duction. The experiment detailed in the report below, while it relates to beef production, is: valuable knowledge for the dairymen of the state. The ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 255 work was done under the direction cf the Coilege of Agriculture, Univer- sity of Illinois. The details were: L—WINTERING CALVES. OBJECT. The object of this experimeni is to determine the relative merits of silage and shock corn as factors in beef production. The comparison is made both by weight of feeds and area used in their production. Everything considered it seemed best to begin with eight-months-old calves; to feed them liberally through the winter months without = at- tempting to fatten them or to secure the greatest possible gains; to turn them to grass with or without grain, according to the season, and the abundance and kind of pasturage ivailable, and, finally, to finish them during the second fall and winter on rations similar to those used in wintering them as calves. These calves were purchased in Kansas dur- ing the early fall of 1901 by Mr. E. D. Funk, an extensive cattle feeder of Bloomington, McLean county, [Uincis, upon whose farm this experi- ment was conducted and to whom the Experiment Station is indebted for his active interest and co-operation. The feeding extended overaperice of 88 days. Equal areas of the same kind of corn were harvested as silage and shock corn for use in this experiment, a careful record being kept of the cost of harvesting and feeding of each. After the termination of the winter feeding the calves were ardedl to grass on May 17, 1902. Their gains will be noted at frequent intervals during the grazing season. Next fall and winter they will again be placed in the teed lot where they will receive rations similar to those of the firs« winter for a time sufficient to finish them for the market. The experiment wi!l ke terminated by a slaughter test. PLAN OF *XPERIMENT. ANIMALS USED. Fifty eight-months-old grade Hereford and grade Shorthorn calves were selected for this experiment. Upon their arrival at Mi. Funk’s farm the calves were given the run of blue grass pasture and stalk fields 256 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. until within a few weeks of the date of beginning the experiment, when they all received shock corn and mixed hay. The calves as they ar- rived from Kansas were quite thin, showing the effects of short pas- tures; but by the time they were tut in the experiment, February: 5, 1902, they were in good thrifty condition and of about 500 pounds aver- age weight. It was a decided advantage to be able to get calves that were so nearly uniform and that nad been so similarly treated. They were divided into two lots of twenty-five each, care being taken to make lots equal as to age, thrift and quility. Ten shotes averaging 65 pounds each were placed with each lot of calves, the object being, to reduce the waste of shock corn feeding to the minimum by converting the corn in the droppings into pork and to de- termine what benefit, if any, pigs would get in following silage-feed steers. SHELTER FOR CALVES AND PIGS. The calves and pigs were given the run of feed lots in which they had access to the shelter of alarge shed adjoining the barn in which were the mixed hay and the stave silo containing thd silage used in this experiment. The shelter provided tor these calves was warmer and more protected than the average feed-lot shed, owing to its location and tothe fact that it was not all open on one side. The calves and pigs gained ac- cess to it by large doorways opening to the south. The kind of shelter afforded is specified because it is generally believed, and'rightly so, that cattle fed largely on silage or other succulent food should have warmer quarters than those fed onadry raiicn. Then again it should be remem- bered that the animals used in this experiment were calves which no effort was being made to fatten, but simply to keep growing nicely. Itis economy to give such calves reasonably warm winter quarters even in localities where there might bea yqtestion as to the economy of furnishing to fleshy cattle on full feed anything more than shelter from wet storms and coid, driving winds. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 257 ~ Every effort was made tosurrcend both silage and the shock corn ~ lots with conditions equaliy favorable for securing the best results from each feed. RATIONS FED - The amount of corn put into the silo represented an area of 5.33 acres; 4 ‘An equal acreage of corn was also cut and shocked in the field where it _ remains until needed for feeding tc the calves during the winter and spring “months. All of the corn was cut with a corn binder. tee There was a total of 101,200 pounds or 50.60 tons of corn put into the silo. “As taken out there: were 86178.81 pounds, or 43.09 tons. There was,. “therfore, a total loss of 7.51 tons, or 14.88 per cent. in the siloing of 5.33 ' acres ofcorn. Of this loss two tars were taken from the top of the silo ‘in @ condition unfit for use. This would leave 5.51 tons, or 10.88 per cent. * as Shrinkage in gross weight... This is not an unusually high percentage. - When it is remembered that a toial of only 50.60 tons of corn were put into the silo from 5.33 acres it will be seen that the yield of silage per acre was » about ten tons or below what an average crop should be for Illinois. It : ‘is well known that there was a short corn crop last season. Add tothis the : fact that in this case the corn was of a small early maturing varicty and itis easy to account for the low tor nage secured. This shortage in yield : per acre was not as apparent inthe case of the silage as with the shock corn, Had the plot which was fed as shock corn. been husked and the 4 stover field cured there would have heen a yield of only thirty-two bush- “would have been1.68 tons. Ofthe vield of shock corn 38.4 per cent “was ear corn (70 pounds to the bushel!) and 61.6 per cent. was stover. It will be seen that. the proportion ci corn to stover in this instance wasal- together too small and the total yield of corn and stover much below a ‘normal crop. The stover usually represents from 50 to 55 per cent. of the total tonnage of the corncrop, the average generallyy being some- thing above 50 per cent. 258 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. While these small yields interfere with our making a good showing as to the total number of pounds of beef it is possible to produce from an acre of corn either as silage or as shock corn, they do not interfere with our comparing the results of feeding the corn crop by these two methods. The shock' corn from the 5.33 acres was weighed as fedout. Thetotal amount fed was 29095 pounds, or 14.55 tons, very close to one-third ¢c* of the gross weight of the sillage as fed out. The rations were made up as foilows: Lot 1. Silage, whole oats and mixed hay. Lot 2. Shock corn, whole oats and mixed hay. That we might be able to make as direct a comparison of the corn part of these rations as possible, the same amounts of whole oats and mixed hay were fed to each lot except as noted below, while the amount of sil- age and shock corn fed varied wich the appetites of the calves. .1t was thought advisable too, to keep the amounts of food stuffs other than shock corn and silage as small as possible, since corn and its products are bound to remain the greatest factors in beef production. As all the calves had been getting shock corn and mixed hay up tothe beginning of the experiment the calves in Lot 2 naturally took to their ration more readily than did the calves in Lot 1 which were started on silage, a food stuff with which they were entirely unfamiliar. It should be said, however, that the steers in lot 1 never failed to relish their silage after the first few days. The average daily ration for cach steer at the beginning of the exper- iment, February 5, 1902, was as fuilows: Tot 1. Sila se. 9 ois ie kc oe eee ee eee (Cab TOS: ORES ajo ckinss a afaie desta eae ahs RUNES 2 Ibs Mixed Way .c) htc haces ieee sete 4 Ibs. Ts0f- 2: Shock COL . 2. cai. vis eel alegre 11.5 Ibs. Oats. oo seine whta, oa. sid eigen ane 2 Tbs. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 259 The amount of mixed hay fed to Lot 1 was increased on the second day of the experiment to 6 pounds per head per day as the ration given above did not seem to satisfy the calves. On the third day the amount of silage was increased to 20 pounds per head per day. It took about. three weeks to get the proportions of food stuffs used satisfactorily ad- justed, especially was this true with the lot receiving silage. Each steer in Lot 1 would have consumed 25 pounds of silage after the first ten Gays. The average daily ration for each steer on March 3, 1902 was as follows: Lot 1— MAS Spee aids ah ves Pena esl ofa, «°dupes di tiagu? Sim ecmae a Wi aie 6 are 25 lbs MMM MTS oie State silcas Vis‘ Kusirelis oo ool oy yeh odes a eiwtia ne, cals 2 lbs Mixed hay (clover énd timothy).... ........ 4 lbs Lot 2— eMC OMEN So 550) D's 5)'5 a's bau oor shee aor es siphas weet ace ae 13.8 lbs Are ce) Tor wreck ah ay 3's Mestre eG owe aos owe deco ecayss 2 lbs Mixed hay (clover and timothy) .......... 4 lbs In a week’s time it was found that the shotes following the calves getting silage were not only failing to make satisfactory gains, but were actually losing in weight quite rapidly, a condition which was anticipat- ed. The feeding of one pound of ear corn to each of the shotes in Lot 1 began February 13th. Underthis treatment the pigs maintained a con- stant weight until March 3rd, when the ear corn was increased from one to two pounds per pig per day. During the week following this increase in feed the pigs made an average daily gain of nearly a pound per head. Dur- ing the next week, however, they lost about a tenth of a pound and it was thought best to still further increase the amount of corn to three pounds per pig per day. This ration, in addition to what was secured from the droppings of the steers getting silage, produced satisfactory gains. By this system, however, we were not able to arrive at any very definite con- clusion as to just how much of the gain of the pigs could be credited to the droppings of the silage fed steers. It will be remembered that ten shotes 260 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Lt ae were following twenty-five steers. It was thought best to decrease the | number to five and not give them any additionalcorn. For the first week — following this change each of the five pigs made a daily gain of .4 pound | 3 There appeared to be sufficient food in the droppings of the twenty-five | steers to keep five i00 pound shotes growing nicely; however, the next — week the pigs lost 1.14 pounds per head, showing the necessity of still — further reducing the number of pigs if they were expected to thrive on ss the droppings alone. Subsequently the number of pigs with Lot 1 was de- creased to one. By this system of reducing the number of pigs follow-— a ing silage-fed calves which received a daily ration of 25 to 30 pounds of Silage, two pounds of whole oats and four pounds of mixed hay to each Siecr, it was observed that the droppings from twenty-five such calves would keep one and possibly two pigs growing nicely. Figured out more — accurately we might say that it would be fair to credit Lot 1, the silage-fed e slccrs, in addition to the beef made, with the production of 87 pounds ta pork in 88 days. The matter of pigs following silage-fed steers will bear — further study. | ; The ten shotes following\the twenty-five steers getting shock corn, — oats and mixed hay received no corn ofr other food stuff in addition a what they secured from the droppings of the steers. The total amount 3 of pork made by the pigs following the shock corn let was 587 pounds in ; 88 days. During the first 70 days of the experiment, only ten pigs were a run with the steers getting shock corn. Dvring this period they made a a total gain of 476 pounds. In other words, the steers in Lot 2 receiving a shock corn should be credited, in) addition to the beef made during the S first ten weeks, with the production of 6.8 pounds of pork per day. Dur- ing the last 18 days of the experiment, fifiecn shotes were run with the © shock corn lot and these pigs made a total gain of £9 pounds, or anaver- age total daily gain for the fifteen of 4.9 pounds. This clearly indicates that when the pigs are expected to get their feed from the droppings of the FS. steers better results in pork production were secured when ten and not fifteen shotes were run with the twenty-five steers getting shock corn, 4 oats and mixed hay in the quantities above mentioned, than when fifteen — ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 56; pigs were made toiollowthesame lot of steers. It should be remember- ed tiat these steers were calves and tha: they were not on full feed. More pigs could be run with older cattle on full feed to advantage. - WEIGHT OF STEERS AT THE j|BEGINNING AND END OF THE EX- PERIMENT AND TOTAL NUMBER OF POUNDS OF BEEF PRODUCED. Lot 1—Silage fed— hotel welsh: of 25 steers-February 5, 1902........ ......... ..12606.66 lbs ortreieie, Gi 2zostecTs May 5, 1902.00... ce eee eee 16300.00 lbs SR ASE OOT SAID OS GAY Sie cits vi Sa Mb l ee ev eee ee ee 3693.34 lbs Average weight of ihe steers at beginning of experiment..... 504.24 lbs Average weight of the steers at end of exneriment.......... 652.00 lbs Average total gain per steer in 88 days..... we. cee cee eee 147:76 lbs eee aI V SAIN PCT SLECT 6 6. ie es ewe ee wee ee en 1.68 lbs Lot 2—Shock corn fed— Mamraiwerent OL25> Steers February 5, 1902.0 5.0. 0... cee we 12296.66 lbs Pine woiaic mina Steers May 5, 19-020... 000 6 oe oe be es 154380.00 Ibs Sie eee RLECTS GNSS GAYS. 6... vc tee ewise so acess cee e ¥OLOOO4: IDS Average weight of the steersiat beginninz of expcriment.. 491.86 lbs Averace welent of the steers at end. of experiment......... 617.2. Ibs Average total gain per steer in &§ days...... 675.5 he wut tk web eante 125.34 lbs Perey eat PCT SUCCL cee ck ees ta eevee eb we as 1.42 lbs The steers in Lot 1 (with silage as a part of their ration) made uni- formly satisfactory gains fromthe start. Except during two weeks each steer in this lot made an average aaily gain of one pound or more. The average daily gain per steer for the whole period of 88 days was 1.68 pounds. The hignest average daily gain for a period of a week was made during the week ending April14)th, when the steers gained 2.74 pounds per day peranimal. The lowest average caily gain per steer was made during the week ending March 17th, when the gain was .85 of a pound. The total number of pounds of beef produced during the 88 days of the experiment was 3693.34. The steers in the shock corn lot, or Lot 2, were much more variable in their gains and the average daily gain was not so great. To indicate ihe wide range in the average daily gain of the steers in this lot may be 262 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. stated that, during the week ending March 3d, there was an average daily gain of only .28 of a pound per steer while during the week ending April 7th, the average daily gains of each steer was 3.2 pounds. Theshock corn from 5.33 acres, the acreage usedin this experiment, was exhausted on May 5th. The shock corn lot, therefore ,should be credited only with the beef made by the steers in Lot Z between the dates February 5th and May 5th, a period of 88 days. During this time the shock corn steers made a total gain of 3133.34 pounds, oran average daily gain of 1.42 pounds per steer. These figures show that 14.55 tons or 5.33 acres of shock corn to- gether with 137% bushels of oats, and 4.4 tons of clover and mixed hay made 3133.34 pounds of beef and 587 pounds of pork, or a total of 3720.34 pounds of beef and pork. All of the shock corn produced on the 5:33 acres was consumed. In case of the silage only 69.95 per cent of the total amount of silage was used. This 69.95 per cent of 5.83 acres of corn (3.73 acres) or 28%, tons silage fed together with 137% bushels of oats and five tons clover and mixed jay made 3693.34 pounds beef and 87 pounds pork cr a total of 3780.34 pounds of meat The acreage required for crops other than corn was computed cn a basis of an average crop of fifty bushels of oats per acre and one an.} one-half tons of hay per acre. The silage remaining, 24,678.81 pounds (1.6 acres) ted together wit 2.15 tons (1.43 acres) of hay and 59 bushels (1.18 acres) of oats would produce 1622.53 pounds of beef aud 33 pounds of pork at the same rate of gain per pound of food consumed ag that which pervailed during the progress of the experiment. Had the silage all been fed the amount of land used in the production of the corn, oats, and hay consumed would have been 14.02 acres, of which 5.253 acres) would have keen devoted to corn, 4.98 acres to oais and 4.76 acves to hay, or 8.69 acres of crops other than corn. In the case of shock corn, the amount of land used in the pro-- duction of corn, oats, and hay consumed was 11.01 acres of which ‘5.33: were devoted to corn, 2.75 acres to oats, 2.93 acres to hay or 5.68 acres to crops other than corn. Frem these figures we see that in feeding shock corn and corn silage from equal areas of land, the additional acreage re- ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 263 ct ae ai ee ee ee oO PS quiring to be devotec to crops other than corr is 53 per cent more in the feeding of ihe silage than in the feeding of the shock corn. On the basis of the total area involved 62 per «ent in case of silage, and 51.6 per cent in case of shock corn were devoted to growing crops other than corn. It should be borne in mind that this 1efers to the acreage involved and not the meat made. From these data we can compute the number of pounds of meat (beef and pork) produced per acre. Where silage, oats and hay were fed, 385.35 pounds of meat were produced per acre. Where shock corn ,oats ,and hay were fed. 337.91 pounds of meat were produced per acre. As the amounis of hay and cais fed to the two lots were practi- cally the same, it is reasonable to suppose that this difference of 47.45 pounds of meat produced per acre was due to the different form in which the corn plant was fed. As ihe better results were secured wiih the lot of steers receiving their cornu in tke form of silage, we may conclude that this experiment indicates shat it is posible to get 47.45 pouncs more meat from an acre of corn put in the silo than when fed as shock corn to calves which are being wintered raiker than fattened. This experiment indicates that there are at least nine advauiages of a system of silage feeding over that of shock corn in the wintering of calves intended for bee! production. First, the corn can be hauled from tke field and stored in the silo at a time when little damage is done to the soil by getting onto the land when it is too wet. Second, the manure and litter incident to the feeding of steers where silage is used are in much more ccnvenient form to handle, and probably they are more readily available as plant focd than where shock corn is fed. Third, the quality of silage and the cost and convenience of feeding it is but little, if any, affected by iad weather which in Iliinois so frequent- ly makes it next to impossible to feed shock corn to advantage. Fourth, the calves in the spring are in better thrift and flesh. Fifth, more rapid gains can be secured. 264 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Sixth, in case of .an epidemic cf cholera or other contageous swine disorder ,the pigs as a factor in economical production of beef may be eliminated without any considerabie loss, which would be impossible in case of steers feeding on schock cr whole corn. Seventh ,more pounds of meat can be produced per acre where silage is fed to steers than where shock. corn is used; even though the greater amount of pork produced in case. of a system of shock corn feeding is taken into account. Highth, a much larger proportion of the meat produced is beef. Ninth, the corn may be harvested earlier in the season, generally be- fore danger of frosts, and ata season, in Illinois at least, when other ~ farm work is not pressing. In speaking of the advantages of the silo it should not be overlooked that silage may be stored for late summer feeding when pastures are oftensnort and the new corn crop is too im- mature to feed to good advantage. The disadvantages apperato be: First, that in feeding equal acreas of corn as silage and as shock corn a greater acreage of crops oiler than corn is required to supple- ment silage than shock corn. Tvis is an item which can not- consis- tently be overlooked, as economical beef production in the corn belt in- voives the utilization of as large a proportionate amount of corn as possible; nevertheless, when we ci nsider the ultimate effect upon the fertility of the soil ,the clover acreage, at least, may very profitably be increased. ; Second, it is believed that wormer quarters must be provided for silage fed steers than for those vrecciving shock corn. Third, a system of feeding stecrs on silage involves more capital and labor. Before attempting to draw final conclusious from the result of this experiment as to the value of silage in beef production the reader should bear in mind that wintering calves is but one factor in beef production and that this experiment will not be complete until we havean opportun- ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 265 ity to study the subsequent development of these two lots and the qual- ity of the finisned product. Conciusions are withheld, therefore, until the experiment is completed. : This experiment is but one of a seriés which is intended to thorough- “Ay Sepestizate this subject of silage as a factor in beef production. eae : SUMMARY. 1.The results secured in this exy.eriment were from a yield of ten tons 7 of corn silage to the acre and 32 Lusheis of shelled corn and 1.68 tons of 3 corn stover per acre. ; eae “Of the 50.60 tons of corn pul into the silo, but 43.09 tons were 3 available for feeding, there being a less of 7.51 tons. Two tons or j about four per cent were spoiled silage taken from the top of the silo - and 5.51 tons or 10.88 per cent were shrinkage in gross weight. . “ds. The gross weight of silacse availabie for feeding was about three _ times as great as that of shock corn. 4." Tr the feeding of 5.33 acres ci silage to calves 8.69 acres of crops _ Other than corn were used. In the teeding of 5.33 acres of shock corn to calves 5.68 acres of crops otker than corn were used. This difference _ may or may not be found unavoidaple. a 5. It requires a third longer time to feed an acre of corn silage than an acre of shock corn. 6. The average number of pounds of meat made per acre from a system of silage feeding where oats and hay were used as supplementary feeds was 385.35, where shock corn with oats and hay were fed 337.91 | poutids—a difference of 47.45 pouids per acre in favor of a system of ; silage feeding. | ' " %. So far as the cost of harvesting and feeding crops for the pro- duction of beefi s concerned, in the ret profits of the enterprise, itshould be borne in mind that it will probably require nearly twice as great an ex- _perditure of labor and capital :n a system of silage feeding as in a sys- ‘tem of shock corn feeding. 266 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 8. The silage-fed steers were in much better thrift and flesh at the end of the experiment .than were the shock corn fed steers. 9. In case of the silage-fed sieers 97.69 per cent of the meat produced was beef and 2.51 per cent pork. in case of the shock-corn-fed steers 84.22 per cent of the meat produced was beef and 15.78 per cent was pork. This clearly shows that pork production is an important factor in a system of feeding shock corn for beef production ,while it may be en- entirely eliminated from a system of silage feeding for beef production proctically without loss. 10. It should be noted that the silage-fed lot comsumed less feed than the shock corn lot and less feed per’ pound of gain whether beef alone is considered or beef and pork combined. The amount of dry mat- ter required to produce a pound o1 gain of meat where the corn was fed in the form of silage was 6:52; where fed in the form of shock corn 1t was 8.57 pounds. ' 11. With an average daily ra‘ion to each steer in Lot 1 cf 26 pounds silage, two pounds oat and 4.55 pounds of mixed hay, an average daily gain of 1.68 pounds was secured lor a period of 88 days. With an average daily ration to each steer in Lot 2 cf 13.22 pounds shock corn, two pounds oats and four pounds mixed hay an average daily gain of 1.42 pounds was secured for a period of 88 days. \ 12. Under conditions compaiabie with those prevailing in this ex- periment one steer would beableto make an everage daily gain of 1.68 pounds for a period of six months on .82 of an acre of silage, oats, and hay of which .31 of an acre would be devoted to corn for silage, .23 of an acre to oais ard .28 of an acretohay. One steer receiving shock corn, oats and hay would beabletomake an average daily gain of 1.42 pounds for a period of six months on .92 of'an acre, of which .45 of an acre would be devoted to growing the corn, 22 of an acre to oats, and .24 of an} are to hay, making a difference 2 of .26 of a. pound of. meat per day per steer | and one-tenth of an acre of land for the season, both being in favor of the steers receiving their corn in the form of silage for the period desig- nated. -* ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 267 Dairy Laws of Illinois Laws of 1879, page 111. (Hurd’s Revised Statutes, chapter 38, sections 9-9e.) AN ACT to regulate the saleof milk, and to provide penalities for the adulteration thereof. (Approved May 29, 1879.) Section 1. That whoever sha!!, for the purpose of sale for human food, adulterate milk with water or any foreign substance, or whoever shall knowingly sell for kuman food, milk from which cream has been taken, without the purchaser being informed or knowing the fact, or whoever shall knowingly sell'for human food, milk from which what is commonly calied “strippings”’- has been withheld, without the purchaser - thereof being informed or knowing the fact, or whoever shall kinowingly sell for human food milk drawn irom a diseased cow, knowing her to be so diseased as torenderhermilk unwholesome, or whover_ shall knowingly sell for human food, :nilk so tainted or corrupted as to be un- wholesome, or whoever shall knowingly supply, or bring to be manufac-. tured into any substance for human food, to any cheese or butter factory or creamery, without all interested therein knowing or being informed of the fact, milk which is adulterated with water or any foreign sub- stance, or milk from which cream has been taken, or milk from which what is commonly called “strippings” has been withheld, or milk drawn from a diseased cow, knowing her to be so diseased as to injure her milk, or milk so tainted or corrupted as to be unwholesome, or whoever shall knowingty; with intent-todefraud,-iake-from-milk after it has been de- livered'to a cheese factory, or butier factory or creamry, to be manu- factured ‘iftto any. substance for. kiuman food,-for or.on account of the per- son supplying the milk or cream, ox shall, with like intent, knowingly add any foreign substance to the milk or cream, whereby it, or the pro- 268 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. ducts thereof, shall become unwhelcsome for human food, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and for eachand every such -‘misdemenaor shall be fined not less than twenty-five nor more than one hundred dollars or con- fined in the county jail not exceeding six months or both, in the discre- tion of the court. Sec. 2. Any person who shal! adulterate miik, with the view of - offering the same for sale or exchange, or.shall keep cows for the produc- tion of milk for market, or for sale or exchange, in an unhealthy condi- tion, or knowingly feed the same on food that produces impure, diseased, or.unwholesome milk, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars, tor each and every offense. Sec. 8. Any person or persons who shall in any of the cities of-this State, engage in or carry on a retail business in the sale, exchange of, or any retail traffic.in nuik, shall have each and every case in which the milk is carried or exposed fo.'saie or exchange, and the carriage or vehi- ; Cle from which the same is vended, conspicuously marked with his,-her, or their name or names, also indicating, by said mark the locality from which said milk is obtained or produced, and.for every nesiect for such markings, the person or persons so neglecting shall be subject to the penaities cxpressed in section 2 of thisact; bptior every v-olation of this act, by so marking sai dcan, carriage, or vehicle, as to convey the idea that said milk is produced or procured from a different locality than. it © really is, the preson or persons eo offending shall be subject toa fine” of one hundred dollars. Sec.4. Any person wiio shall, in any of the cities in this State, offer for sale any milk from which theci¢am or any part thereof shall have — been taken, shall offer forsale and sell the same as skimmed milk, and not | otherwise, and shali have each cat: or vessel in which such milk is car- ried, or exposed for sale, plainly aud conspicuously marked with the words “Skimmed Milk.” Any person violating this section shall be sub- ject to a fine not exceeding fifty ao’lars for each and every violation. ° pe - =~ , ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 260, See. 5. Upon the rendition of judgment imposing a fine as provided , : z in the foregoing sections; it shail be the duty of the justice of the peace €: or other court rendering said judgment, aiso to render a judgment for the costs, and forthwith toissuea , Hastings, Ill. H Herman, G., Manhattan. Haecker, Prof. T. L.; St. Anthony Houglend, A. C., Little Turkey, Iowa. Park, Minn. (Heller & Merz.) Hicks, J§ E., Thomson. Hopkirs, H. H., Hinckley. Henry, R. J., Millersburg. Hollister, W. S., Pana. Hawthorne, G. E., Elgin. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 21] Hoppensteadt, Geo. W., Eagle Lake. Hansen, A., Stewart, Minn. Hostetcer, W. R., Mt. Carroll. Hyne, W. J., Evansville, Wis. Hostetter, A. B., Springfield. Herkenheim, P. J., Malta, I11. Hardiker, F.-H.; Chicago (Merchants’ Henry, E. J., Chicago. Despatch Transportation Co.) Howe, T. J.,. Owatonna, Minn. Hoisington, S. S., Stillman Valley. Horsirg S. S., Stillman Valley, II. Harvey, W. R., Clare. as J Jennings, A. A., Chicago (Star Union Jensen, S. M., Orangeville, III. Lines.) Johnson, Frank, Rockford, IIl. Johnson, Lovejoy, Stiilman Valley. Jacobs, F. I., 185 South Water Street, Johnson, L. H., Byron, Ill. Chicago. K Kerns, Walter, Warren, IIl. Kruempel, Gustave, Frankrort Station, Kniggs, L. H., McHenry Ill. Kendall, George, Mt. Carroll, Il. Kieffer, P. H., Strawberry Point, Iowa. Kirkpatrick, J. R., Oakdale. Kimzey, W. S., Tamaroa, Iil. Kiibourne, C. S., Aurora. I, i-udwig, Mat, Goodings Grove Lichthardt, Herman, Schaumberg, Hl. Lally, W. A., Chicago (Erie Despatch Likens, Curtis C., Walworth, Wis. Transportation Co.) Lorengen, C., Rockford, III. Long, M., Woodstock. Linn, John E., Gaylord, Minn. izcas, O. F., Belvidere. Laird, W. R., Yorkville, Il. Lioyd, W. B., Glen Ellyn. Leighton, F. A., (Genesee Salt Co.) Loud, H. P., (Francis D. Moulton & Co.) New Hampton, Iowa. Chicago, III. La Bundcy, B. A., Elkhorn, Wis. M Mann, W. E., Pecatonica. Mason, J. L., Elgin. Metzger, F. L., Millstadt. Mason, J. P., Elgin. McNish, F. J., Chicago (Creamery Murphy, R. R., Garden Prairie. Package Mfg. Co.) Monrad. J. H.. New York. Moore, W. S., Chicago. Musselman, S. L., Brookville. Muller, F. J., Milledgeville. Maurer, W. H., Rock Grove, Ill. McCredie, Wm., Elgin. McFavland, Frank, Big Rock, Ill Malary, Grant, Freeport. McConnell, Carrie, Ridott, Ill. - 312 McFarland, Frank, Big Rock. Myers, O., Little Rock. McNurlin, Wm. L., Stewart. Nowlan, Irvin, Toulon. Nelson, Peter, Creston. Nolan, H., Hinckley. Newman, Joseph, Elgin. Olson, Chas., Kirkland. Ohi, Wm., Stevens, III. Poplett, C. A., Dunlap. Powell, J. W., Peoria, (Merchants’ (Despatch Transportation Co.) Petit, Peter, North Aurora. Patterson, J. P., Plainfield. Peak, S. W., Winchester. Powell, L. A., Bowen. Phiilips, Louis, Germantown. Patton, R. A., Hanna City. Redpath, R. C., Baldwin. Rutter, Geo. F., Sr., Libory. Reed, Geo., Belvidere. Reed, Oscar W., Lebanon’, O. Shearer, A. J., Aurora. Sykes, Josiah, Kaneville. Sudendorf, E., Elgin (Wells Richard- son & Co.) Epicer, C. W., Edelstein. Spicer, J. G., Edelstein. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. McNurlin, W. L., Steward, Ill. Mansager, M. J., Ellsworth, Iowa. McEdward, G. A., New Haven, Conn. N Newman, John, Elgin. Nolting, E. L., Elgin. Nolting, August, Elgin. Nagel, W. J., Scarville, Iowa. O Olsen, Hi. P., Ashby, Minn. Peterson, Berger, Round Grove, IIl. Pitteplace, G. L., Hinckley, Ill. Phillips, J. A., Damascus, III. Patterson, R. M., Chicago. Pfingston, H. W. F., Schaumberg, III. Purvis, Miller, 224 Dearborn Street, Chicago. Pierce, Harry, Savanna, Iil. R Rawson, Frank E., Alden, Ill. Rice, H. B., Lewiston. Reynolds, J. W., Nicolet, Minn. Russell, Theodore, Shelbyville, Ill. ap) Sears, Howard O., Garden Prairie. Spanger, E. E., Big Rock. Sloggett, John, Hinckley. Stewart, John, Elburn. Sturgis, Cornish & Burr Co., Chicago. Sullivan, Miss Lizzie, Providence, Ill. ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 313 Steidley, A. B., Carlinville. Straw, 7. H., Shannon, Ill. Spencer, C. V., Chicago. Springsteen, P. J., Egan, Iil. Sawyer, J. Y.. Chicago. Schoch, Irwin E., Damascus, IIl. €wanzey, L. M., Ridott. Seidel, C. H.. Orangeville, Il. Shamel, Clarence A., Chicago. Speed, Chas. V., Baileyville, Ill. Schlattmann, Fred, St. Libory. Seidel. C. H., Orangeville, Ill. Springer. Mrs. Eva H., Springfield. Schlappi. J. Fred, New York. Slouborg. Thomas, Savanna. Segar. J. W., Pecatonica. Soverhill, S. G., Tiskilwa. ' dy ‘Thompson, A. E., Poplar Grove. Taylor, W. H., Stillman Valley. J hompson, Frank B., Greenwood. Thompson, A. E., Poplar Grove, Il. Thompson, M. H., Elgin. Thornton, Charles H., Argyle, Il. ‘Thurston, Henry F., Chicago. Vv VanPatten, David, Plainfield. \ Ww Wright, F. W., Joslin. . Waterman, Geo. E., Garden Prairie. Wood, R. L., Woodhull. Yentworth. E. M., Davenport, Ia., Wilson, Geo. R., Monmouth. . (Star Union Lines.) Welford, R. G., Red Bud. Willson, D. W., Elgin. Williams, C. H., New York (Genesee Wright, S. N., Elgin. Salt Co.) Woolverton, D. C., Chicago. Wilson, E. L., Manhattan. Walline, C. W., Cambridge, Il. Wilder, C. R., Manhattan. Wolf, F. R., Dakota, Ill. Waspi, J. S., Spring Grove. Wolf, Mrs. E., Rock City, Il. Woodard, C. H., Big Rock, IIl. Wood, D. E., Elgin, Ill. Woodring, F. W., Chicago (Creamery Willson, W. C., Elgin, IIl. Package Mfg. Co.) Winnebago Butter Mfg. Co., Winne- Winton, W. W., Madison, Wis. (C. St. bago, Ill. P.& M.R. R.) ¥ Young, H. J., Stillman Valley, Iil. Young. F. L., Kaneville. Young, W. H., Aurora. F Table of Contents Page MNT PT ATISTIIT LAL 5 0, ..c10rs es co. 0,004.0 ue wns we sere Nee eae ta inl aaa es 2 MS Mer Cee Sad en a oe eg Giant eats LS ela ate cih ears 3 By-Laws of the Illinois State Dairymen’s Association .............. 4 Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting ................ 8 ee ewe ee) Cy: er. PPUTIES | oo has vinceniaas ta, acs pee «beac eve ceees 8 Address of Welcome—Mayor Huenkemeier .......... ccc ee eee eee 10 mepmonee—cecreatry George Cavell. ....00 sencecvvcces vencvscseces 11 eee FTAs AGGVESS: f55.'.%. .c cin'e occtn s winia 60 ¥.a.u bic ti tw celstb eagle 6 12 Care, Feed and Feeding of Dairy Cows—Mr. J. Fred Schlappi....... 17 Soy Beans and Vetch, Their Growth and Feeding Value—A. A. Hink- ED Bere ree abd ala cod Gio ae ee A bois a0 el heel Mable tie bie >. Saeieee 35 How to Educate Our Sons and Daughters to Remain on the Farm— MEN MEAAI ED cas A bee aia, a va Weide: aapipl le Blache drole ae wtad ie arer nas qa The Creamery Patron’s Cow—Prof. HE. H. Farrington.............. 52 Poultry Culture as an Adjunctto Dairying—B. F. Wyman.......... 65 Balanced Rations for Milk and Meat Production—W. C. Davis...... 81 eee outer Making—W. R. Hostetter 2.00... ce ccs tees wscnsn 99 Different Methods of Cream Separation—Prot. Oscar Erf ............ 104 Creamery Buttermaking as Seen by the Traveling Salesman—F. A. RM MEPNNESTRE he Goch. oak Galen eins vec ianin Sic boca WE atle I Oe cl ele tae tte hha 114 Starters in Buttermaking—Prof. G. L. McKay ............006 cece 120 Some Lessons from Pan American Dairy Test—DeWitt Goodrich ... 126 Creamery Buttermaking—A. BE. Thompson ............ccc cece eens 137 Sears eter) Work in [linois—A. J... Glover) ooo. cc cece cee eees 142 Pecdine the Dairy: Herd—M. S.Camphell 22.0... ce ee eee 146 The Educational-Side of Farm Life—Mrs. M L. Copeland............ 152 Address by Mr. Patterson eh 2 6 gEaM 25 0 ¢ 2 ee Ree et (TOC ROS SEMNCS ea Ssciniel ss bie iols + 0 ebb so sie .o te wn Up ace baw wie ewan’ 177 _ 316 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. Private Dairyine—Irvin Nolan... 2.2.00... weiss e's ~6 dc ae 180 Silos and Ensilage—B.N. Cobb... ci cccie sowed cc 0 06 0.0 ale alehennennannne 195 Some Causes for Decline of Dairying—E.M. Wentworth............. 207 Seventh Annual Meeting Illinois Farmers’ Institute .............. . 214 Prayer—Key..3. He §. Bily.a% ss fs vas Rlaie ee, Dae chev tus wee 214 Address by Mr. A. J. GlOVWOL, oec6 1005s wigs ieee ww Ve a wenn.) ane noses ee 216 How to Manage a Dairy Herd—Judson T. Mason ...... MP ee 229 Address: by: Mr. Cobb) 5.0005 Deere ves 0 esate ele eee we. esa a 224 Directors’ Meeting and Report of Officers ©... i: -+.«. «..s$0 bie Se 246 Report of University Work... 0. .00. fcc vis oes ne. s:s'ece mewugieleueinenene anna 249 Report of Work’ Done inthe Dairy Section of House Bill No. 315 by TT VINE NO WIAD 6. aoe oy wren; 1010 ale i Aipeneis. oa t,o E Te a) fe pot ene tye eae - 250 Corn Silage vs. Shock Corn for Beef: Production: .......: saan eeee 254 Dairy Laws Of TEMS. oc. . oicc 0 sas bee 0cb75 wiecb f ¥-0 5, vos acd-o.giel 26 Uap pane 267 Pure Food Commissioners’ Bill... 0. <.cuc ss oss edk- yo 00 wie oe 277 . New. National Oleomargarine Law... .. 6.06 os. » ra al a a ” . .~ oat . 2 ” - Fest ge nd, oli +, CMe ie “s rm, OP . ~~ * , outta: » 4 $ : a 4 - <5 ; = y *, . ‘ - - ‘ c chad 5 tay ree iad ~ e a , ——— n pat 4 te “ ‘ ad “y 5 - | _ = “ * of . ~ « 4 7 - a ¢ - ‘ : « <~ . we: ai SS pg ste i iy ~~ ‘Sits ae Thing a i P at 5 a eee , “‘telietioen s Ss 4 - — an « UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA 3 0112 069492046