UMASS/AMHERST 3120bb D2flS ISTM b NINTH ANNUAL REPORT SECRETARY assacIjHSftte %m)i at %^xmliim, TOGETHER WITH REPORTS or COMMITTEES APPOINTED TO VISIT THE COUNTY SOCIETIES, A\^ITH A'N APPENDIX CONTAINING AN ABSTRACT OF THE FINANCES OF THE COUNTY SOCIETIES, 18 6 1 BOSTON: WILLIAM WHITE, PRINTER TO THE STATE. 1862. STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. 1862. MEMBERS EX OFFICIIS. His Excellency JOHN A. ANDREW. His Honor JOHN NESMITH. Hon. OLIVER WARNER, Secretary of the Commomoeallh. APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL. Term expires. EPHRAIM W. BULL, of Concord, 1863 MARSHALL P. WH.DER, of Dorchester, 1864 PAOLI LATHROP, of South Hadley, 1865 CHOSEN BY THE COUNTY SOCIETIES. Term expires. Massachusetts, EICHARD S. FAY, of Boston, . . . 1865 Essex, GEORGE B. LORING, of Salem, . . 1863 Middlesex, JOHN B. MOORE, of Concord, . . 186^ Middlesex, North, .... ASA CLEMENT, of Dracut, . . . 1865 Middlesex, South, .... HENRY H. PETERS, of Southborough, . 1863 Worcester, JOHN BROOKS, of Princeton, . . . 1863 Worcester, West FREEMAN WALKER, of N. Brookfield, . 1863 Worcester, North, .... JABEZ FISHER, of Fitchburg, . . . 1865 Worcester, South SAMUEL HARTWELL, of Soutbbridge, . 1865 Wui-cester, South-East, . . . HENRY CHAPIN, of Milford, . . . 1864 Hampshire, FranUin and Hampden, . MOSES STEBBINS, of South Deerfield, . 1864 Highland, MATTHEW SMITH, of Middlefield, . 1863 Hampshire, LEVI STOCKBRIDGE, of Hadley, . . 1865 Hampden, PHINEAS STEDMAN, of Chicopee, . 1864 Hampden, East, SHERMAN CONVERSE, of Monson, . 1864 Franklin, JAMES S. GRENNELL, of Greenfield, . 1865 Berkshire, HENRY COLT, of Pittsfield, . . . 1864 Hoosac Valley, JOSEPH WHITE, of Williamstown, . . 1864 Housatonic, SAMUEL H. BUSHNELL, of Sheffield, . 1864 Norfolk, CHARLES C. SEWALL, of Medfield, . 1865 Bristol, NATHAN DURFEE, of Fall River, . . 1803 Plymouth, CHARLES G. DAVIS, of Plymouth, . 1863 Barnstable, S. B. PHINNEY, of Barnstable, . . 1865 Nantucket EDWARD W. GARDNER, of Nantucket,. 1863 Marthas Vineyard, .... DANIEL A. CLEAVELAND, of Tisbury, 1805 CHARLES L. FLINT, Secretary. NINTH ANNUAL REPORT SECRETARY BOARD OP AGRICULTURE. To the Senate and House of Representatives of the Common- wealth of Massachusetts. It is gratifying to be able to state that the past year has been one of marked prosperity for the agricultural interests of the Commonwealth. Our crops liave been for the most part abun- dant and profitable, farm labor has been cheaper and more easily obtained than for some years past, and the season was generally favorable, both for the operations of the farm and the growth of vegetation. The exhibitions of the Agricultural Societies, with one or two exceptions, were more than usually successful in point of completeness and attraction, and the number of interested visitors to those exhibitions was never known to be greater. The operations of the Board of Agriculture have been contin- ued as heretofore. At the meeting held at the office of the Secretary, on the 19th of February, 1861, various subjects were assigned to special committees for investigation during the year, with the duty of presenting a report upon each at the regular annual meeting. Accordingly Dr. Bartlett of the Middlesex North Society, presented the following 6 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. KEPORT ON THE DISEASES OF VGETATION. The power of God, which has so often been put forth to build up and protect our beloved country, has in a special manner interposed itself during the past year to shield our crops from pestilence ; and that Providence which " tempers the wind to the shorn lamb," has filled our barns and -granaries with a healthy and abundant harvest. We have indeed peculiar cause for thankfulness, that while disease has ravaged the potato fields of Ireland and Canada, and the crops of all Europe have been cut short, we, as a nation, have been l)lcssed with an abun- dance of food. Yet notwithstanding we have been preserved from the devastating effects of vegetable disease, the opportuni- ties for studying the subject entrusted to us have not been altogether wanting, since the total failure of the fruit crop is only to be regarded as a manifestation of disease, and the disease of the apple tree, which formed the main topic of our report a year ago, has been constantly under our observation. In previous reports a disease of the bean has been alluded to, which has been steadily increasing and enlarging its area, and will probably soon place us in reference to this legumenous plant, in the same uncertainty which affects us in reference to the potato, making it essential to secure new varieties often, or to find ourselves forced to give up the venerated dishes of our ancestors, baked beans and succotash. The disease alluded to commences with small brown spots upon the pod, having a nearly uniform direction, commencing near the back of the pod and spreading thence toward its front. The long diameter of these spots being oblique to the two sides just named, apparently affecting the parenchymatous matter deposited between the ribs of the pod, which lie in the same direction. These spots commence upon the external surface of the pod, and gradually work their way through to its interior, the brown color changing to black as it progresses. If the kernel lies contiguous to such a spot it takes on the same appearance, and becomes dark colored or even black, according to the time which is afforded for its progress by the period which elapses after the disease commences, previous to the ripening of the pod. The superficial area of the spots does not appear to increase after their commencement, and their nature would seem to be that SECRETARY'S REPORT. T of dry gangrene. In some seasons the fruit is so much affected that the crop could hardly be disposed of in the market, in consequence of the large proportion of discolored beans, and in all seasons if the pea beans offered in the market be carefully examined, more or less of them will indicate the influence of the disease by a black discoloration at the point where it touched the pod. Most varieties are liable to the attack of this pest, but some are much more susceptible of its influence than others, the Saba, Horticultural, and Case Knife, being most commonly affected among the pole beans, while the bush varieties are equally subjected to its pernicious effects, and neither varieties of soil nor differences of season appear to affect its extent or its progress. Nothing particularly new upon the disease of the apple tree, described in the report of 1860, has presented itself, but a more careful and extended examination of diseased trees tends to confirm the conclusion that trees trimmed or injured previous to the 1st of May are more liable to take on the disease at the point of injury than those upon which the operation is performed at a later period. One marked case, illustrating this point, it may not be improper to relate. In the month of November, 1856, an old apple tree, the top of which was much decayed, was trimmed for grafting in the ensuing spring. Two large trunks, measuring more than twelve inches in diameter, were sawn off, the stumps being left without protection from the influence of the weather, the chief portion of the old wood being thus removed by the saw. About the middle of the following April the young limbs which grew below the stumps made in the preceding autumn, were grafted with the orange sweeting. At the present time the large stumps sawn off in November, five years ago, are perfectly sound, and although not healed the wood is very hard, almost like iron, and the bark entirely free from blackness, while nearly, if not quite all the stocks grafted in April are more or less diseased. Another fact bearing upon a theory sometimes advanced — that this disease originates in the excoriat- ing character of the sap — deserves notice. It is this : that the disease commences often upon the upper side of the grafted limb, where no sap flowing from it could by any possibility be applied. Instances are not wanting of this disease in other varieties of 8 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. trees than the apple- The black oak of our forests is affected in a manner precisely similar, and induced apparently by the operation of the same exciting cause, viz., injury in some form. This subject has not been investigated with sufficient thorough- ness to make it at all proper to theorize upon the specific nature of the disease in question, or its predisposing causes ; but if future observations should confirm the fact "which we have hinted at in regard to the effect of spring trimming, a point will be attained from which we may be able to start in future investigations, with a reasonable expectation of more certain results. It will not perhaps be thought out of place in this report if we give a small space to the consideration of the remarkable failure of the fruit crop, which has during the past year equally disap- pointed the hopes of the producers and consumers of what had grown to be considered a necessary of life. For some years a feeling of uncertainty in regard to the invest- ment of much capital in fruit raising, has been gaining strength in many agricultural districts, based upon partial failures of some specific crop, and as certain theories have been adopted by fruit growers to explain the failures which have given so much cause for complaint, it will be proper to examine the facts in the premises, not so much to establish new theories, or confirm old ones, but tliat obstacles which now hinder us from arriving at the truth may be at least partially removed. Our stone fruits, coming into the comparatively high latitude of New England, from the mild and genial climates of Persia, southern China, and Asia, could not fairly be expected to become so completely changed in nature that they should not often fail occasionally to mature crops of delicious fruit ; and in regard to the peach and the plum, their early maturity and short term of vigorous life would very much impede, if they did not entirely prevent any great degree of adaptation to their new climate ; and perhaps this is all that need be said of those two varieties. Whether the cherry is about to place itself in the same class with those just named, or whether it is gradually breaking down under the debilitating influence of excessive cultivation, is yet to be determined. It is certain however, that no tree, however vigorous, can for a long period remain capable of fully maturing its buds, while subjected to the attacks of the immense SECRETARY'S REPORT. 9 number of insects which constantly feed upon the foliage of the cherry tree, and thus check the maturing of its new wood. These remarks upon the cherry are not offered so much to explain the peculiar failure of the last season, as because they havp a bearing upon the almost universally dying condition of the trees. The apple crop of New England, behig of far more present importance than all our other fruit crops together, we shall devote tlie remainder of our report to its recent failure, and a statement of some simple facts in relation to it. The orchards in most sections of Massachusetts gave early indications of a fruitful season, so far as a very full bloom could point to such a result ; but while the apples were well and abundantly formed, they fell very profusely from the trees, until most of them had no more to cast off. A very commonly received explanation of this fact attributes it to the injury inflicted by the curculio. To test this point one hundred Gravenstien apples were taken from the ground at random, no other selection being made than was sufficient to pick those as nearly uniform in size as possible. Thrown promiscuously into a basket, each apple was examined carefully for the wound indicating the attack of the insect. Of the whole number gathered, only twenty-three were found with the "mark of the beast" upon them. At this time the tree retained only three apples, two of which had the crescent shaped wound. Of these, one had been attacked in eleven distinct points, and yet grew to be the only tolerably perfect apple upon the tree. We think this may be assumed as a strong argument against the curculio theory. It has also been common with many persons to attribute such blighting of the apple crop either to the cold of the preceding winter, or to east winds prevailing about the period when the orchards were in bloom. It may be that both these conditions of the weather produce the deleterious effects attributed to them, but when we consider that a careful examination of weather tables, extending over a period of nearly or quite two hundred years, fixes the fact beyond dispute that the seasons of New England are unchanged in any important particular during that period, and also that the apple orchards have produced liberally notwithstanding severe winters and persistent east winds, we must perforce 2* 10 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. admit that before these causes could be made to endanger seriously the fruitfulness of our trees, some change in the vital powers of the tree itself must have taken place to enable climatic influences which had always existed to work serious injury. It is an evil incident to the cultivation of exhausted soils, tha* the farmer is obliged to feed his crops of all descriptions with manures, concentrated and stimulating, in exact proportion to the degree in which the soil has been drained of its nutritive elements. This course, expensive as it may be, is essential to successful competition, with new soils, rich in the food which provident nature has carefully stored up for her own farming, but must, in accordance with the uniform action of the vital laws, tend to debility and disease. As a consequence of this system, those changes of climate and atmospheric influences, which were intended to promote health, may become, when acting upon the diseased plant, pernicious, and tluis cause the destruction of our fruit. It has been maintained by some persons that the serious failures in fruit have been preceded by unusual quantities of snow, while the ground has remained unfrozen, and the experience of the past year may tend to confirm the observation. Somewhat extensive inquiries seem to point to two facts, which, although they may not be found to be universal, yet are too well established to be entirely over- looked. First, that ungrafted trees bore more profusely than those which had been grafted. Some instances of this occurred where native fruit was matured in comparative abundance, while the fruit of trees grafted with the same native fruit, and growing in close proximity failed entirely, while the proportion of native fruit growing in the pastures, and commonly used for the manufacture of cider, was very much greater than that of grafted fruit raised in cultivated grounds for the market. The effects of the common method of cleft grafting, upon the health of the tree, has not received the attention which it deserves. A careful examination of many grafted limbs indicates the fact that the cleft made for the insertion of the scion never heals, but remains as a covered wound probably during the life of the limb, and the tongue by which it is fixed in its place remains within the cleft and very often decays there, and must always be a source of irritation as a foreign body. It is by no means unusual to find incipient decay connected with SECRETARY'S REPORT. 11 the cleft in limbs which externally present a healthy and vigorous appearance. There is another point in connection with this subject which deserves attention and thought, and with its consideration we shall close our report. It must be that large growing trees, like the apple and the cherry, which send strong roots deep into the earth, draw a portion of their nourishment from the subsoil far beyond the reach of the farmer. There can certainly be no good reason assigned why in the lapse of years this subsoil should not become much sooner exhausted in consequence of the stimulus applied to the tree by the application of concen- trated manures, such as an artificial necessity, growing out of the demands of the market, now forces the cultivator to apply to the surface roots. These superficial organs cannot be roused into an unnatural degree of activity, without in time exciting a corresponding activity in the whole vital powers of the tree, and the lower roots must soon be called upon, by the necessity of preserving a healthy balance of action among the vital organs, to take up from the subsoil nutritive matter much faster tlian nature has provided for its supply. Hence the tree will first fail to be fruitful, and finally die. The fact has always been known that a young tree never flourishes vigorously, if placed in the same spot from which an old tree of the same kind has been recently removed, and upon the supposition just alluded to, this fact is readily understood. When to the exhaustion of the subsoil is added the injury done in many orchards by injudicious ploughing, the surface roots being often cut off and forcibly drawn out of the ground, it is not a matter of surprise that under such a system of operative surgery the patient should die of exhaustion before reaching maturity. Whatever may be the true explanation of the present and prospective failure of the fruit crop, it appears that we are to place but little reliance for our crop except upon comparatively young trees ; and we can only secure these by combined resetting and removal of decaying trees ; and it may yet be found profitable, although contrary to the commonly received doctrine, to depend to some extent upon thrifty suckers which spring from the roots of trees which the axe has removed. Many fine trees could be pointed to, whicli have in this way taken the place of others, and having the benefit of large roots 12 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. f at the outset, have grown vigorously, and come into bearing condition at a much earlier period than seedlings. The Qommittee make the latter suggestion as the result of their individual experience and observation. John C. Bartlett. Henry H. Peters. Ephraim W. Bull. Dr. Loring of the Essex Society, presented the following EEPORT ON CATTLE BREEDING AND FEEDING. The question of " the raising of cattle, with the cost in quantity and kind of food, and the breeds best suited to different purposes," seems to include the whole system of cattle hus- bandry ; and is a matter of the deepest importance to every farmer. There is no branch of husbandry so universal, none more capable of yielding fair profits, none more important, none more dependent upon good farming, and none more likely to be attended by good farming when properly pursued. The value and utility of horses, no one questions. Of the profits and benefits of sheep husbandry in certain localities, no one can doubt. The hog, among some nations, has entered largely into the supply of animal food for man. But wherever man resides, whether civilized or savage, whether roving or stationary, whether on mountain pastures or in cultivated and luxuriant valleys, in good farming and in poor, in every spot where grass grows for cattle, and "herb for the service of man," there the herd attends him, and supplies him with food, and labor, and clothing, and the means of tilling the earth. The breeding of cattle has occupied the attention of some of the most careful observers, and closest experimenters, in the list of active and progressive farmers. The labors of Bakewell, and the traditionary rules which guided him, still have their value. The name of Colling will endure, so long as the enonomy of farming requires a rapid production of beef, for the supply of populous markets. And wherever the dtyry con- stitutes the chief agricultural business, the practical sagacity of Aiton will ever be remembered. Under the guidance of such men as these, the aboriginal cattle of England, those wild droves SECRETARY'S REPORT. 13 in wliich a weight exceeding four hundred pounds was rarely reached, have been developed to those important breeds wliich are now of so much value to that kingdom, and have been scattered so widely over the globe. And, in addition to this, the soil and climate of almost every region have aided the judicious agriculturist in developing a breed particularly adapted to local necessities. Not that soil and climate alone will do this. For it was not the valley of the Tees which brought the hard-hided, coarse-boned, thriftless, misshapen, lyery cattle of Holland,* and the profitless frames of Yorkshire, up to the perfection of modern improved Short- horns— it was a farmer of that valley, using the soil and climate, and breeding aright. So it was the intelligent farmers of Ayrshire, who adapted themselves to the agricultural capacity of that region, and raised the miserable cows of their hills to the superiority of their modern dairy animals. In neither case did they attempt to force a breed of cattle upon an uncongenial soil and climate. Mr. Alton knew the value of the hills and vales of Scotland for dairy purposes. The Messrs. Colling understood how beef would grow, if properly planted, on the fat pastures of England. Let us imitate their example. It is a disregard of the rules which they fpllowed, in fact of all proper rules, which has brought confusion to the cattle- breeding of New England, and has rendered it thus far too much a profitless game of chance. Amidst the many wise and praiseworthy efforts which have been made to improve our herds, there has been a great deal of bad breeding, which, with * " The Short-horned cattle, under -which denomination are indiscriminately included the Dutch, Holderness and Teeswater breeds, are supposed to have acquired the appellation of Dutch, from a cross with some large bulls that were imported near a century ago from Holland into Yorkshire, in the east and north sidings of -which county the t-wo latter had been long established. It has, ho-wever, been doubted whether any advantage -was derived from this intermixture ; for the increase thus obtained in size was thought to have been counterbalanced by a more than appropriate increase of offal. But, fortu- nately, the error was not universal ; for some intelligent breeders, aware even at that day of the superiority of symmetry to bulk, preserved the breed of which they were already in possession, in its native purity ; and it is from some of that stock, so maintained, or, at least, from a cross between that stock and some of the progeny of the Dutch and Teeswater cross, that the present improved Short-horned cattle, are descended." — Complete Grazier. 14 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. bad feeding, has reduced the average of our stock to a very low standard. We have been led to believe that there may be somewhere an universal breed of cattle, suited to all purposes, of general excellence for the combined business of the dairy, the stall, and the yoke. And with tlie hope of arriving at this we have been groping in the dark, until we seem to have fairly lost our way. By undertaking too much, and without proper rule, we have, as usual, accomplished but little. Most of us can call to mind the unsuccessful efforts made in a region of short pastures and scanty food, to improve the stock by the introduction of a Short-horu bull — feeble cows and coarse oxen being the natural consequence. "We have all seen a Jersey bull sent into a rich grazing region, and serving merely to glorify by contrast, the large and thrifty cattle already planted there. How many vain attempts have been made to introduce Ayrshires, with all their dairy qualities, into a luxuriant section, whose " paths drop fatness all around ! " How much food have we seen wasted on misplaced Devons ! " A place for every thing and every thing in its place," is the motto for cattle-breeders, who occupy such a diversity of soil and climate as ours. Amidst the general inferiority of our cattle, we find exceptions, where either wisdom oi; accident has produced a gratifying result. So true is this, that every sagacious purchaser of stock knows where to go in pursuit of choice animals. There are certain towns, certain counties, certain valleys of rivers, in New England, which have become noted for their fine cattle, and whose reputation has been established, by the fortunate introduction of blood well adapted to the place. There is no doubt that our cattle need improvement, both by breeding and by feeding. Whatever may have been the origin of our so-called natives, they have become a mass of confusion, without any distinctive features which would give them value, and without any certainty of transmitting even the good qualities which they do possess. Large numbers of cattle are raised among us, which in no way remunerate the raiser or feeder, even when the cost of keeping until ready for market, is estimated at the lowest possible figure. We are too apt to breed badly. Sufficient care is not always used in selecting the female, in the first place. A cow that happens to be a good milker, in spite of many bad points, and SECRETARY'S REPORT. 15 witliout any known good ancestry, is expected to produce good heifer calves. Without much care for the male, we set her at the work — she transmits her poor qualities, perhaps increased by the sire, and her good ones disappear. A large cow is selected for the purpose of raising oxen, her size being her only recommendation. She may be a bad feeder, a bad handler, a bad mover, in fact deficient in those very points which render an ox good for the yoke and the stall. "We breed from her, and she disappoints our expectations. We choose a good cow for choice breeding, unmindful of the quality of the bull which has been previously coupled with her ; and we are astonished, and mortified, and discouraged, to find that she produces any thing but what we desired and expected. r3S7%5^,*-»„--:.-^ -.^ Ayrshire Cow, "Jessie." BREEDING, — THE FEMALE FOR THE DAIRY. If we would improve our native stock, therefore, we should begin by a careful selection of females, from the best herds already established, care being taken to consider always the objects we have in view. No matter what the yield of milk from a cow may be, she should not be selected for a breeder, unless she possesses as an inheritance, that shape which indicates strong vitality, and that quality which indicates active secretory functions. She should have — Head of medium size, with a strong, well-marked, bony structure, broad be- tween and high above the ey^s, and wide between the roots of the horns, with a capacious but not clumsy muzzle, full nostril, 16 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. an eye full, mild, not too large and prominent, jowls thin and wide, horns small, well-curved, clear, slightly turned upwards, — and with a calm, and at the same time strong and resolute expression ; neck long, well-rauscled, slender, tapering towards the head, with little loose skin hanging helow, and not dropping too much forward of the shoulders ; shoulders thin and sharp at the top, and lying close to the chine, somewhat prominent, strong-muscled, and loose-jointed at the point, (the head of the humerus,) long from the point to the elbow ; fore-quarters light and thin, with straight and slender fore-leg, broad knee, and broad, flat, capacious foot ; carcase deep, round and full about the heart, and increasing largely towards the hind-quarters ; back straight and loosely jointed ; pelvis wide over the hips, long, and supplied with strong muscles ; hind-quarters broad, strong on the outside, and well cut out inside, with strong hock, and a long tapering foot ; tail long and slender, strong at the roots, and set on in a line with the back ; udder evenly divided into four quarters, extending well forward, filling the cavity between the thighs behind, not hung low, and with a large, long, and crooked milkvein ; teats set far apart, and of medium size and length ; skin loose and elastic, but not too thin ; hair soft and silky, and of lively appearance ; ribs broad and flat, and, especially the two last, widely separated. A yellowish color to the skin, especially that lining the ears and about the eyes, is desirable. A good cow should possess the appearance of strength and firmness, without being too compact ; and she should present no palpably weak point, if she is expected to endure well, in the work of the dairy. With regard to the size best suited for dairy purposes, opinions differ materially — but on our ordinary New England pastures, a cow that will dress, in fair condition, six hundred pounds, seems to be the most appropriate. THE FEMALE FOR BEEF. In selecting females for the breeding of beef cattle, wo must not be governed by the rules laid down for the dairy. There should be greater roundness of bone ; the shoulders should be closer, firmer, thicker at the top, and the fore-quarter generally more substantial, bearing about the same relation to that of the dairy cow, that the shoulder of a draught-horse bears to that of a SECRETARY'S REPORT. 17 trotting horse. The brisket should be deeper, the body more uniform, and the head smaller in proportion to the body. Perhaps Youatt's description of such an animal is the best that can be given, although, as will be seen, he applies it to both Shorthorn Cow, "Duchess ' males and females. He says : " The animal should have wide and deep girth about the heart and lungs ; and not only about these, but above the whole of the ribs must we have both depth and roundness ; the hooped as well as the deep barrel is essential. The breast should also be ribbed home ; there should be little space between the ribs and the hips. This is indispensable in the fattening ox, but a largeness and drooping of the belly is excusable in the cow. It leaves room for the udder, and if it is also accompanied by swelling milk- veins, it generally indicates her value in the dairy. This roundness and depth of barrel, however, is most advantageous in proportion as it is found behind the point of the elbow, more than between the shoulders and legs; or low down between the legs, than upwards towards the withers ; for it diminishes the heaviness before, and the comparative bulk of the coarser parts of the animal, which is always a very great consideration. " The loins should be wide, for these are the prime parts ; they should seem to extend far along the back ; and although the belly should not hang down, the flanks should be round and deep, the hips large, without being ragged, round rather than wide, and present when handled, plenty of muscle and 3* 18 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. fat ; the thighs full and long, and when viewed from behind, close together ; the legs short, for there is an almost insepa- rable connection between length of leg and lightness of carcase, and shortness of leg and propensity to fatten. The bones of the legs and of the frame generally, should be small, but not too small — small enougli for the well known accompani- ment, a propensity to fatten ; small enough to please the con- sumer, but not so small as to indicate delicacy of constitution, and liability to disease. Finally, the hide, the most important thing of all, should be thin, but not so thin as to jndiciite that the animal can endure no hardships ; movable, mellow, but not to*loose, and particularly well covered with fine and soft hair." Guided by these rules, the breeder can select females adapted to either of the two objects specified, or, if he desires it, to both combined, so far as that is practicable. If he expects to breed with any degree of certainty, he should choose females that have never been coupled with the bull. Of course, in making the selection, regard should be had to the blood as well as to the quality of the animal ; and even with the utmost caution, it cannot be expected that every heifer will fulfil her promise as a breeder. She may transmit just those qualities of her ancestry, which she herself has escaped. But whatever may be her qualities, she cannot be used for breeding in one direction, after she has been used for breeding in another. A cow, therefore, which has borne calves by one bull, cannot be safely used for breeding purposes with another, unless it be desirable to preserve in some degree in her progeny, the qualities of the former bull. So many facts going to substantiate this theory arc recorded, tliat it seems hardly necessary to dwell upon it further. The well-known instances of the Arabian mare belonging to the Earl of Morton, which after having been covered by a quagga, pro- duced colts by thoroughbred horses with the marks of the quagga upon them — of the mare of Mr. Morrison, which, after having borne a mule, gave to her colts, sired by stallions, the marks of the mule — of the Aberdeenshire heifer, which produced her first calf from a Teeswater bull, and gave subse- quent calves by Aberdeenshire bulls, the long horns of the Teeswater — of ewes tainted in their first coupling by the ram, — SECRETARY'S REPORT. 19 are sufficient to satisfy any one that females thus impressed cannot be properly used for breeders. And it is very doubtful whether a female may not be thus impressed, any time during her breeding life, by a bull of stronger blood than her own. We have seen an Ayrshire cow, which, after having brought three calves by an Ayrshire bull, was coupled with a Jersey, and all of whose subsequent calves bore distinct marks of the Jersey — the older and stronger blood of the male having gained an ascendency. And we have heard many a careful and enterprising farmer wonder that the progeny of his superior cows, bore the marks of the common and inferior bull, with which they were thoughtlessly coupled, in early life, notwith- standing the care he had afterwards taken. It is, indeed, possible that this obstacle may be overcome by two or three generations of breeding ; but time may be saved and the difficulty avoided, by a little trouble in the beginning. The expense will be amply repaid. ^--^^-j^^ -" Short-horn Bull, "Double Duke.' THE BULL. There is no doubt that the stock of New England has suffered more from the use of inferior and badly bred males, than from inferior and badly bred females. Tlie bull is usu- ally looked upon as the least profitable animal on the farm. He is treated as an outcast, and his presence is too often con- sidered a necessary calamity. His immediate benefit is not perceptible. He neither earns his living by labor, nor by the 20 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. <:frowth of such a quality of beef as is remunerative in the market. He is viewed with a certain degree of dislike in his youth, and is not allowed to reach mature years, through fear, that in his strength, he may repay the insults and injuries received in his weakness. He is purchased for nothing, at a time of life when he is good for nothing ; and sold for nothing, because he is considered to have done all that was expected of him. Nobody thinks of paying much for his services ; and the longer he lives the larger is the account against him, which his owner is eager to settle summarily and finally. Now it is this despised animal, which is hurried out of exist- ence before he has had time to develop his own qualities, or to give any mature evidence of what he can transmit, which has the most important part to perform m the business of cattle breeding. It is undoubtedly true that the mferiority or supe- riority of the male, rather than of the female, affects the quality of the offspring. A superior herd can be injured by an inferior bull ; an inferior herd can be improved by a su])erior bull. There is no doubt that the female imparts important qualities to the offspring — perhaps vitality, constitution, the nutritive functions. But all experience goes to prove that we stand a better chance of securing good offspring from a good male and an inferior female, than we do from an inferior male and a superior female. This, in addition to the fact that the male has a larger sphere of operations than the female, shows the vast importance of a careful selection of the former. It seems, moreover, that through the male, the strongest ancestral qualities are transmitted. " Show me the bull's mother," said the Scotchman, when called upon to pass judgment upon his neighbor's newly-purchased animal. It was the dam of Hubback, which possessed that remark- able aptitude to fatten, which distinguish the breed of Improved Short-horns. But it was Hubback himself, which transmitted this quality to a long line of descendants, and laid the founda- tion of this remarkable family. It is to Comet, and Red Comet, and Roan Duke, and Swinley, and Cardigan, among cattle ; to Messenger, and Justin Morgan, and Black Hawk, among horses, that we are indebted for the improvements which have been made among these different classes of animals. For it is by them that good ancestral qualities have been trans- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 21 mitted and diffused. And, dependent as we are upon tlic quality of the female, upon those qualities which will best unite with and develop the qualities of the male, it is to the latter that we are to look for the advancement we are to make in breeding. Hence the fabulous prices paid for males of all animals which are bred for the farm ; hence the large incomes of the pioneers in breeding, for the use of the males, — Mr. Bakewell having received 130,000 in one year for the use of his rams, and the Messrs. Colling having received equally exorbitant prices for the use of their bulls — facts which our farmers should remember, when they are willing to keep bulls for the service of which they do not expect to receive a remu- nerative price. There is no more profit in using a poor bull, than there is in keeping a poor cow. Aj^rshire Bull, "Albert.' In selecting a bull, regard should be had, of course, to the object of breeding, this being decided by climate, soil, and location. The description already given of the dairy cow, will apply somewhat to the bull. Mr. Alton remarks, that " the Ayrshire farmers prefer their dairy bulls according to the feminine aspect of their heads, necks, and fore-quarters, and wish them not round behind, but broad at the hoop-bones and hips ; and they like them best that are full in the flank." It is particularly important that shelliness of skin and roundness of buttock should be avoided. There is no end to the mischief 22 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. which such animals may produce, whether used for tlie dairy or tlie stall. This is well illustrated by CuUey, who, in speak- ing of the successful efforts of Mr. Dobinson, in breeding Short- horns and importing blood from Holland, says : — " But afterwards some other persons of less knowledge, going over, brought home some bulls that introduced the disagreeable kind of cattle called lyery, or double lyered, — that is, black-fleshed. These will feed to gi'eat weight, but though fed ever so long will not have a pound of fat about them, neither within nor without, and the flesh (for it does not deserve to be called beef) is as black and coarse-grained as horse flesh. No man will buy one of this kind, if he knows any thing of the matter ; and if he should be once taken in, he will remember it well for the future. People conversant with cattle very readily find them out by their round form, particularly their buttocks, which are turned like a black coach-horse, and the smallness of the tail ; but they are best known to the graziers and dealers in cattle by the feel or touch of the fingers ; indeed it is this nice touch or feel of the hand that in a great measure constitutes the judge of cattle." In fact, the nearer the bull comes, in dairy breeding, to the points of a good cow, the better. And, in this branch of hus- bandry, the male should not much exceed the female in size. For other purposes, as well as in some degree for this, the following description, taken from the " Complete Grazier," will be found useful and instructive : — " A bull, then, ought to be the most handsome of his kind ; he should be tall and well made ; his head should be rather long, but not coarse, as fineness of head indicates a disposition to fatten ; and as it is designed by nature to be the chief instrument both of oflTence and of defence, it ought to present every mark of strength ; his horns, clean and bright ; his large black eyes, lively and protuberant ; his forehead, broad and close set, with short, curled hair; his ears, long and thin, hairy within and without; muzzle, fine ; nostrils, wide and open ; neck, strong and muscular, not incumbered with a coarse wreathy skin, but firm, rising with a gentle curve from the shoulders, tapering to the part where it is connected with the head ; dewlap thin, and but little loose skin on any part. His shoulders should be deep and high, and moderately broad at the top ; the bosom open ; breast large, and projecting well before his legs ; back straight and broad, even to the setting on of the tail, which should not extend far up tlie roof, but be strong and deep, with much lank hair on the under part of it ; ribs broad and circulai', rising one above another, SECRETARY'S REPORT. 23 so that the last rib shall be rather the highest ; the fore thighs strong and muscular, tapering gradually to the knees; the belly deep, straight, and also tapering a little to the hind thighs, which should be large and square ; the roof wide, particularly over the chine and hips, or hooks ; the legs straight, short-jointed, full of sinews, clean, and fine boned ; knees round, big and straight ; feet distant one from another, not broad, nor turning in, but easily spreading ; hoofs long and hollow; the hide not hard nor stubborn to the touch; the hair uniformly thick, shorty curled, and of a soft texture ; and the body long, deep, and round, filling well up to the shoulder and into the groin, so as to form what has not improperly been termed a round, or barrel-like carcase." PURE BLOOD. Let the object of the breeder be what it may, he cannot expect to arrive at any degree of perfection without the use of a full-blooded male, of the breed which he has chosen. This rule has been strongly urged by some of the best farmers in England, and has so far attracted attention in this country, that premiums are offered for no other bulls by some of the agricultural societies of Massachusetts. And, after having chosen a bull of any breed, whose progeny proves satisfactory, it is undoubtedly judicious to obtain, in changing, for purposes of future breeding, a bull of similar strain of blood. If a farmer has a herd of grade cows, the product of a pure bull of any breed, he can improve the quality of his stock with more rapidity and certainty, by the use of a bull somewhat nearly allied tol'the sire of this herd, than in any other manner. Perhaps this is not desirable, if he has in view the immediate sale of his animals, rather than the improvement of his stock. But constant crossing keeps the breeder always just where he began, especially if the cross is in any way violent — as between a cart horse and a thorough-bred, or between a Jersey and a grade Devon. It is close breeding which has produced our best breeds^ of cattle, horses, and sheep ; and if it stops at such a point that the health and strength of the offspring are not endangered, it is the only means by which we can establish a reliable and valuable breed among us. We have numerous instances in which small families of cattle in New England have been brought to a high degree of perfection by close breeding, combined with good feeding. And what is done on a small scale may be done on a large one. There is no doubt 24 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. that the first fruits of a judicious cross may be very profitable and valuable ; but if these fruits are at once indiscriminately commingled, the poorer qualities of either parent may at once gain the ascendency, and the benefits of the first crossing may be entirely destroyed. This may also be done by an injudicious cross, brought into the herd from blood of another strain. Let me illustrate. If I had a dozen cows sired by Kirkleavington, and I found that the cross had many valuable qualities, which I wished to perpetuate and develop more fully, I should have more confidence in the ability of a good bull, distantly related to Kirkleavington, to improve my stock still further, than I should in a bull having no connection whatever with this family. These views differ somewhat, I know, from some modern theories ; but I know of no better rule for the production of uniform excellence, and the ultimate production of powers worthy of transmission. We have so little pure breeding in this country, and so much time has been wasted by incessant crossing, that perhaps the rule laid down would be more advantageous to us, than to breeders who can avail themselves of selections of pure blood at any time and from large supplies. In adopting this principle, moreover, it should be satisfactorily ascertained that the qualities obtained are valuable, and worthy of transmission. The following remarks, from a writer on cattle in the " Library of Useful Knowledge," although differing somewhat from the foregoing, and although often quoted, are so useful, that they are well worthy of insertion in every treatise o* breeding. He says : — " At the outset of his career the farmer should have a clear and determined conception of the object which he wishes to accomplish. He should consider the nature of his farm ; the quality, abundance or deficiency of his pasturage, the character of the soil, the seasons of the year when he will have plenty, or deficiency of food, the locality of his farm, the market to which he has access, and the produce which can be disposed of with the greatest profit ; and these things will at once point to him the breed he should be solicitous to obtain. The man of wealtli and patriotism may have more extensive views, and nobly look to the general improvement of cattle ; but the farmer, with his limited means, and with the claims that press upon him, regards his cattle as a valuable portion of his own little property, and on which every thing should appear to be in natural keeping, and be turned to the best advantage. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 25 The best beast for him is that which suits his farm the best, and with a view to this, he studies, or ought to study, the points and qualities of his own cattle and those of others. The dairyman will regard the quantity of milk — the quality — its value for the production of butter and cheese — the time that the cow continues in milk — the character of the breed for quietness, or as being good nurses — the predisposition to garget or other disease, ov dropping after calving — the natural tendency to turn every thing to nutriment — the ease with which she is fattened when given up as a milker, and the proportion of food requisite to keep her in full milk or to fatten her when dry. The grazier will consider the kind of beast which his land will bear — the kind of meat most in demand in his neighborhood — the early maturity — the quickness of fattening at any age — the quality of the meat — the parts on which the flesh and fat are particularly laid — and, more than all, the hardihood and the adaptation to soil and climate. " In order to obtain these valuable properties, the good farmer will make himself perfectly master of the characters and qualities of his own stock. He will trace the connection of certain good qualities and certain bad ones, with an almost invariable peculiarity of shape and sti-ucture ; and at length he will arrive at a clear conception, not so much of beauty of form, (although that is a pleasing object to contemplate.) as of that outline and proportion of parts, with which utility is oftenest combined. Then carefully viewing his stock, he will consider where they approach to, and how far they wander from this utility of form ; and he will be anxious to preserve or to increase the one, and to supply the deficiency of the other. He will endeavor to select from his own stock those animals that excel in the most valuable points, and particularly those which possess the greatest number of these points, and he will unhesi- tatingly condemn every beast that manifests deficiency in any one important point. He will not, however, too long confine himself to his own stock, unless it be a very numerous one. The breeding from close affinities has many advantages, to a certain extent. It was the source whence sprung the cattle and sheep of Bakewell, and the superior cattle of Colling ; and to it must also be traced the speedy degeneracy, the absolute disappearance of the New Leicester cattle, and, in the hands of many agriculturists, the impairment of constitution and decreased value of the New Leicester sheep and of the Short-horns. He will therefore s^k some change in his stock every second or third year, and that change is most conveniently effected by introducing a new bull. This bull should be of the same breed, and pure, coming from a similar pas- turage and climate, but possessing no relationship — or at most a very 4* 26 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. distant one* — to the stock to which he is introduced. lie should bring with him every good point which the breeder has labored to produce in his stock, and, if possible, some improvement, and especially in the points where the old stock may have been somewhat deficient, and most certainly he should have no manifest defect of form ; and that most essential of all qualifications, a hardy constitution, should not be wanting. " There is one circumstance, however, which the breeder occasionally forgets, but which is of as much importance to the permanent value of his stock, as any careful selection of animals can be — and that is, good keeping. It has been well said that 'all good stock must be both bred with attention and well fed.' It is necessary that these too essentials in this species of improvement should always accompany each other ; for witliout good resoui'ces of keeping, it would be vain to attempt supporting a valuable stock. It is yet more evident when animals are absurdly brought from a better to a poorer soil. The original stock will deterio- rate if neglected and half-starved, and the improved breed will lose ground even more rapidly, and to a far greater extent." NEW ENCxLAND CATTLE FOR MIXED PURPOSES. While a distinction has been drawn between the breeding of animals for beef, and for the dairy, in the suggestions that have already been made, there is no doubt tliat the two objects can be combined to some extent. " It is probable," observes Sir John Sinclair, " that, by great attention, a breed might be reared, the males of which might be well calculated, in every respect, for the shambles ; and the females of which might, when young, produce abundant quantities of good milk ; yet when they reached eight or nine years of age might be easily fattened. This would be the most valuable breed that could be propagated in any country ; and, indeed, some of the best English and Scotch breeds have almost reached that point of perfection." In New England also, there has, in some sections, been some approach to this. With all the existing diversity in our cattle, there arc, scattered in every direction, and without any known relationship, small families, not constituting in any respect a breed, which combine size and thrift, with very good qualities for the dairy. There can hardly be said to be any great * On this point wc differ somewhat; distant relationship, if sound, and possessed of valuable points, it seems to us, will bring about the desired result, with more rapidity and certainty. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 27 uniformity among the individuals of any one of these families — only a certain pervading excellence, good dairy cows, not perhaps those which can be most economically and profitably fed for the dairy, nor those which will bring to the stall the highest fattening qualities — but pretty good animals in both capacities. These families of cattle bear no marks of having descended from the same origin. In some instances, they appear to be grade Devons, the cross, whatever it may be, having imparted larger growth, more bone, and heavier quarters, than are seen in pure animals of this breed in this country. In other instances, the prevailing type is that of the old-fashioned Durhams, like the Gore and Derby stock, or Coelebs, rather coarse and ill-favored animals, sometimes denominated Holder- ness. In other places, there are evident marks of Ayrshire blood, either-derived from some long-forgotten Ayrshire bull, or resembling that breed from an accidental cross, somewhat analogous to that adopted by the Scotch farmers in establishing their well-known dairy stock. It is hardly proper to denomi- nate these various families, as the native breed of New England, because, although some of them were founded at a time and in a manner long since forgotten, yet others are of modern and well-remembered origin, and ail differ from each other very essentially. It is, indeed, very difficult to account for the want of simi- larity in our New England cattle. It may be owing to the variety of the importations which have been made from time to time — Short-horns, Durhams, Ayrshires, Devons, Jerseys, just as the taste of the importer might dictate. But while most other sections have types of their own, sprung perhaps from one early introduction, and not interfered with for many generations, while in the old country, the Devon, and Hereford, and West Highlander, and Galloway, and Suffolk, and Jersey, and Short-horn, are preserved with purity, although in nearer proximity, than the cattle of the Aroostook are to those of the Connecticut Valley, we have neither established an uniform New England breed, nor have given to each locality such a distinct breed that the experienced eye can detect the origin of the droves that congregate in our markets. We seem not yet to have learned what breed of cattle is best adapted to our wants. We have not yet discovered what animal machine will 28 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. convert our farm products into the most money. If we had done this, we should not see one farmer devoting himself to producing the mammoth proportions of the 8hort-horn, while his immediate neighbor is satisfied with the Devon, or the Ayrshire, or the Jersey. It is very evident that the same tract of land cannot be fed indiscriminately with all these breeds, with an equal prospect of success, and with equal results. As our agriculture advances, this defect will undoubtedly find a remedy. METHODS OF REARING. With regard to the best methods of rearing cattle, much depends upon the prices of food consumed by them in various localities ; upon the manner of feeding ; and upon the time occupied by them in arriving at maturity. A large proportion of the expense may be incurred during the first few months, in the period of calf-hood, when the animal requires good nourish- ment, and tender care, in order to start it well in life, and to lay a foundation for future usefulness. No statement of the various modes of feeding the calf, can be more com- prehensive than the following, taken from the " Complete Grazier " : — " There are two modes of feeding calves : one is to permit them to run about with the parent cow the whole of the first year ; tlie other mode is to wean them when about a fortnight old, and bring them up by hand. " The former expedient is generally allowed to be productive of the best cattle, and is adopted in those countries where fodder is abundant and cheap ; in others, where it is found prudent to reserve a portion of the milk, the following plan is pursued. From the time the calves are dropped, till they are able to support themselves, they are allowed to run in the manner above mentioned, but they are prevented from sucking by means of a small piece of leather, having little sharp iron spikes fixed upon the outside, which is tied on the upper part of the calPs nose, in such a manner as to allow it to feed upon the grass without restraint. Hence, as often as the animal attempts to suck, this instrument pricks the cow, and prevents her from letting the milk flow, till the muzzle is removed, and the portion of milk not taken from the cow is resigned to the calf, and the muzzle is replaced. " Whether calves are designed to be raised for breed, labor, or feeding, care should be taken that they have a sufficient supply of good pasture J SECRETARY'S REPORT. 29 because, if the latter be scanty at first, they scarcely, if ever, attain to a larfi'e o-rowth. The best time for weaning them is, therefore, about that period of the year when the young grass acquires enough succulence, both to entice the appetite, and toaifordcompletenourishment without the aid of other food. Calves, which are dropped in October and November Avill thrive greatly by the nourishing pastures into which they may be turned, in the ensuing spring, if allowed to suck and to be properly sheltered throughout the winter ; but the milk is too scarce at that season to be commonly bestowed on them, and winter-weaned calves seldom arrive at much perfection." I would here remark, that some of the best and cheapest calves that I have ever raised, have been dropped in the autumn. They require good care ; but tliey are very likely to get it in winter, when there is no temptation to turn them to grass, too early. And they are well matured for the nourishing grass of spring. "Various plans have been suggested, and tried with considerable success, for rearing calves without any, or at least with a small quantity of milk. The time of weaning them varies from one fortnight till they are seven weeks old ; but the latter period is preferable, on account of the weak and tender state of the calves, if separated from the dam, at an earlier age. In several counties of England, calves, on being taken from the cows, are with great pains taught to drink skimmed milk, in a luke-warm state ; for either extreme of heat or cold is hurtful to the beast, and not unfrequently produces fatal consequences; about twelve weeks after which, for three or four weeks they are fed with lukewarm milk and water. Small wisps of fine hay are then placed within their reach, in order to induce them to eat. Towards the end of May they are turned out to grass, being taken in a few nights, when they have tepid milk and water given them ; which is usually continued, though gradually in smaller proportions, during the last month, till they are able to feed themselves, when they totally disregard it ; care, however, should be taken that the grass is short and sweet, and by no means rank and sour. Indeed, a spirited American agriculturist (Mr. E. L. Ilomme- dieu, Transactions New York Agricultural Society) is of opinion that calves taken from the cows are much better in a pasture without water than in a pasture of equal goodness with water. The reason he assigns (with which, however, we can by no means agree) is, that when indulged with water they drink too much to supply the want of milk ; whereas, when deprived of water they are forced to eat grass, containing some 30 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. moisture, and soon learn to allay tlieir thirst by eating before the dew is dissipated, and on that account eat more than if they could go to water. "In the county of Suffolk, calves are usually weaned soon after Christmas ; when they are fed with lukewarm skimmed milk and water, having bran or oats in it, and some very sweet hay by them, till the grass is ready ; though if the farmer have carrots, these form an excel- lent article of food, and render the use of Oats unnecessary. About two gallons of milk daily are sufficient for the support of a calf until he begins to eat. It should be given regularly at the same hours ; and he should be kept as quiet as possible, as rest is found to promote his growth materially. " In Ayrshire, calves intended to be reared for dairy cows are fed on milk for the first four, five, or six weeks, and are then allowed four or five quarts of new milk at each meal, twice in twenty-four hours. Some never give them any other food when young except milk, and lessen the quantity when they begin to eat grass, or other food, which they gen- erally do when about five weeks old, when grass can be had ; and the milk is wholly withdrawn about the seventh or eighth week. But if reared in winter, or before the grass rises in spring, they must be longer supplied with milk, as a calf will not so soon learn to eat hay or stra^v, nor thrive so well on them alone as it will on pasture. Others feed partly with meal mixed in the milk, after the third or fourth week ; or gradually introduce some new whey along with the meal, and afterwards withdraw the milk altogether. Hay-tea, linseed jelly, treacle, &c., are also sometimes used with advantage ; but milk,^hen it can be spax-ed, is by far the best as well as the most natural food. " Another mode of rearing calves has been suggested by his Grace, the late Duke of Northumberland, the design of which is to render the use of new milk unnecessary, while the expense is reduced in the pro- portion of two-thirds. It is effected in the following manner : let half an ounce of common treacle be well mixed with a pint of skimmed milk, then gradually add one ounce of finely powdered linseed oil cake, stirring it until the mixture be properly incorporated, after which it is to be added to the remainder of a gallon of milk ; and the whole, being made nearly of the temperature of new milk, may then be given to the animal ; after a short time, the quantity of pulverized oil cake may be increased. This method is said to have been advantageously adopted ; but Lord Egremont has used linseed jelly, in the proportion of a pint to a gallon of skimmed milk, without treacle, and it did not answer. " An infusion of hay, called indiscriminately hay-tea or hay-water has been also applied to the purpose of rearing calves with the smallest quantity of milk. In order to make this infusion, such a portion of fine, sweet hay cut once or twice, is put into a small earthen vessel, as will SECRETARY'S REPORT. 31 fill it, on being lightly settled with the hand. The vessel is then filled with boiling Avater, and carefully closed ; at the end of two hours, a brown, rich, and sweet infusion will be produced, not unlite alewort, or strong tea, which will remain good for two days, even during summer, and which is to be used in the following manner. "At the end of three or four days after a calf has been dropped, and the first passages have been cleansed, let the quantity usually allotted for a meal be mixed, consisting for a few days of three parts of milk, and one jprt of hay-tea ; afterwards the proportion of each may be equal ; then composed of two-thirds of hay-water and one of milk ; and, at length one-fourth part of milk will be sufficient. This preparation (the inventor of which was, many years since, honored with a gold medal by the Dublin Society of Arts,) is usually given to the calf, in a lukewarm state, in the morning and evening ; each meal consisting of about three quarts at first, but gradually increasing to four quarts by the end of the month. During the second month, beside the usual quantity given at each meal, (composed of tliree parts of the infusion, and one part of milk,) a small wisp or bundle of hay is to be laid before the calf, which will gradually come to eat it ; but if the weather be favorable, as in the month of May, the beast may be turned out to graze in a fine, sweet pasture, well sheltered from the winds and sun. This diet may be con- tinued till towards the latter end of the third month, when, if the animal graze heartily, each meal may be reduced to less than a quart of milk, with the hay-water ; or skimmed milk, or fresh butter-milk, may be sub- stituted for new milk. At the expiration of the third month, the animal will scarcely require to be fed by hand ; though if this should still be necessary, one quart of the infusion (which during the summer need not be warmed,) will be sufficient for a day. " The economical mode above detailed has been adopted in some counties of England, Avith the addition of linseed-cake finely pulverized and boiled in the hay-tea only, to the consistence of a jelly, without employing any milk in the mixture ; and as so many excellent artificial grasses are now cultivated for the feeding and fattening of cattle, we con- ceive that an infusio%of any one or more of them would be found more nutritious than if it were prepared from the promiscuous mixtures of grass usually occurring in common hay.* * Mr. Crook, (in the Letters and Papers of a Bath and West of England Society,) is said to have great success with this method. Three sacks of linseed lasted him three years — value eleven dollars. One quart of seed boiled in six of water, for ten minutes, to a jelly, was given three times a day mixed with a little hay-tea. His cattle were remarkably fine. 32 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. " In Devonsliire, the rules commonly followed in rearing calves, are nearly as follows : The greatest number are usually dropped between Candlemas and May, and some much later; but the most experienced breeders prefer the earliest. They are permitted to suck as much as they like, three times a day, for the first week, after which they are suckled by hand, and fed with warm new milk for three weeks longer. They are then fed, during the two following months, twice a day, with as much warm skim milk as they can drink — in which some breeders mix a small portion of finely pounded linseed cake,* or meal ;#after which the meals of milk are gradually abated, and at the end of four months they are wholly weaned from milk, and left to themselves at pasture. " In the northern counties of England, it is a common practice to give the calves equal parts of milk and sweet whey, made lukewarm ; but as this mode often produces scouring or looseness, we think the following method, which was a few years since communicated to the public by a spirited and experienced breeder, is greatly preferable. For the first four or five weeks, he fed them regularly, but oftener than is usually done, with new and skimmed milk, at the end of which time his calves were gradually taught to drink strong watei'-gruel, consisting of equal parts of bean or oat-meal, mixed with the gruel after the latter is removed from the fire. This method of treatment he is stated to have pursued with great success for many years ; his calves being strong and healthy, while every thing that could tend to retard their growth was effectually prevented. "In the county of Norfolk, calves are fed with .-kiinmed milk, in which is mixed a little wheaten flour ; they have also chopped turnips in a trough ; and some hay in a low rack. As soon as these animals learn to eat turnips freely, they are no longer supplied with milk, these roots, with the addition of a little hay, furnishing them both with food and drink. The period of x'aising calves in the above mentioned county, is from the first of October to the first of February; but the time of feed- * Lest we should be understood as indiscriminatolji rocommendinji the use of linseed as food for calves, either in form of infusion or of ground oil cake, we would say that its use in the rearing of dairy stock, cattle for labor, or for store, should be avoided. We are of opinion that its use once begun cannot be discontinued ; and that while it forces the animal to early maturity, and keeps it in high condition, profitable to the breeder of beef, still it is injurious to certain faculties and functions necessary to be preserved in animals whose service begins at a later period of life — such as the dairy cow, and the work- ing ox. This matter is more fully discussed in the following pages. Tiie remarks applied to linseed, we would also apply to all articles of food, of a highly stimulatinji and I'attcniuu nature. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 33 ing them wholly with turnips varies, according to circumstances or acci- dent. Where there are older calves that have been accustomed to these roots, the younger ones soon acquire the method of breaking and eating them, by picking up the fragments left by the former. " Towards the month of March, those which are first reared are turned out among the fattening bullocks during the day, and are sheltered in the night ; though, if the weather proves favorable, they are in a few days turned out altogether. In the succeeding summer they are kept iu clover, or other luxuriant grasses, and the following autumn, are suili- ciently strong to stand in the straw or fold-yard. This circumstance is considered tlie chief advantage to be derived from rearing calves eai'ly in the season ; as those which are raised during the spring require two years' nursing. " The subsequent method of raising calves, by Mr. William Budd, of Boston, Massachusetts, which obtained the prize from the ' Massachu- setts Society for promoting Agriculture,' we give in his own language, extracted from his communication to that Society : — " 'Take calves, when three days old, from the cows, and put them into a stable by themselves ; feed them with gruel, composed of one-third barley, two-thirds oats, ground together very fine, sifting the mixture. Each calf is to receive a quart of gruel morning and evening, and to be made in the following manner ; to one quart of thq flour, add twelve of water, boil the mixture half an hour, let it stand until milk-warm. In ten days, tie up a bundle of soft hay, in the middle of the stable, which they will eat by degrees. A little of the flour put into a small trough, for them to lick occasionally, is of service. Feed them thus, till they are two months old, increasing the quantity. Three bushels of the above mixture will raise six calves.' " Mr. Clift, of the New York Agricultural Society, takes the calf from the cow at two or three days' old ; he then milks the cow, and while the milk is warm, teaches the animal to drink, by holding his head down into the pail ; if the calf will not drink, he puts his hand into the milk, and a finger into the mouth, till the beast learns to drink without the finger. After he has been fed with new milk for a fortnight, the cream is taken off the milk, with which an equal or larger portion of thin flax-seed jelly is mixed, and the whole is given milk-warm. Thus, as the spring is the most favorable season for making butter, he is enabled, during the six or seven weeks the animals are kept previously to weaning, to make as much butter as they are worth ; a practice which merits the attention of our farmers, to whom it will afford a very essential saving, particularly in those counties where butter forms a chief article of manufacture. "In the rearing of calves, much depends on the regularity of feeding them ; the common practice is to supply them with food twice in the 5* 34 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. (lay, in tlie morning and at evening, when they generally receive as large a quantity as their craving appetites can take. Hence the diges- tive organs are necessarily impaired, and numerous animals either become tainted with disease, or perish from the inattention of their keepers ; wliereas by feeding them tlirice a day, at equidistant intervals, and allowing sufficient room for exercise, (when they are not intended to be fivttened,) they will not only be preserved in health, but they will also greatly improve in condition. " Whatever food be allowed to young calves, care should also be taken not to change it too suddenly. A calf must have attained a certain degree of strength before it can dispense with the food most natural to its age, and thrive without the aid of milk ; it should always, therefore, be allowed as long as possible ; but even when that has been withdrawn, and the animal has begun to eat grass, still the substitutes that had been emi)loyed in lieu of milk should be partly continued until his appetite prefer the pasture. It is a common notion, that provided young stock acquire size, their condition is immaterial ; and, after the first winter, they are generally turned into the toughest pasture, and kept during the following winter on straw, with, perhaps, a little inditferent hay. This, when they are intended to be sold to the fatting grazier, may be the most profitable mode, and, in some situations, it is the only one that can be adopted ; but when they are meant to be reared for the breed, it is absolutely requisite, as the oidy means of bringing them to perfect maturity, and improving their qualities, that they should be kept on good pasture during the summer, and allowed roots with some sound hay in the winter, and green food in the spring. A contrary mode, though the most economical, is decidedly disadvantageous ; for the worst breed will ultimately be improved by good feeding, while the best will degenerate under a system of starvation." Ill most of these modes of feeding, it will be observed that the great object in view is the raising of cattle, without inter- fering with the products of the dairy. That this is desirable will be seen at once, when we estimate the amount of milk necessarily consumed by a calf, wdiich is fed from the cow, until old enough to subsist on solid food. In this section of the country, where butter and cheese are manufactured, each cow is estimated to make an annual return of from thirty to sixty dollars ; where milk is sold directly from the farm, to consumers in our large cities, the return is much larger. It is only, therefore, in the remotest regions, that the plan of allow- ing calves to run with the cow for months can be practiced SECRETARY'S REPORT. 35 with any profit, unless it be with breeders of pure blooded stock, commanding high prices iu the market. In those sections where beef-raising and feeding are profitable, it is uudoubtedly best to force the young animal to early maturity — as is done with the English Short-horns. And for the breeder of animals for this purpose, tliose which never falter in their growtli, and arrive early at perfection, are the most desirable. Such animals as these may possibly remunerate the breeder for a somewhat liberal use of milk in feeding. But in the rearing of dairy stock, or those classes of cattle which are not developed properly for feeding until two or three years old, some substitute for milk must be found. We shall endeavor to illustrate this by giving the cost, in figures, hereafter. In the rearing of dairy stock, there are other things to be considered besides the cost and quantity of food, viz., the quality of the food and the mode of feeding, with reference to the ANIMAL STRUCTURE. It is comparatively an easy matter to breed animals, which, by their aptitude to fatten, will remunerate the feeder. The qualities belonging to an animal structure, designed for this purpose, are very perceptible, are easily transmitted, and are easily preserved and improved by feeding. Mr. Bakewell learned almost the precise mechanism adapted to his wants, as a producer of size and fat — the form and quality of bone, the shape of the parts containing the vital organs, and the organs of nutrition, that " feel," which an expert under- stands, so that he may almost be Said to carry eyes in his fingers' ends, capable of exploring the internal organization of every animal. And this bone, and shape of body, and texture of the skin, are easily preserved and transmitted. Breeding does much, and feeding does more, towards this preservation and transmission. When Mr. Colling saw Hub- back, he knew that his stomach, and glandular system, and nervous organization all tended towards the development of fat, and he believed it would be easy to transplant such lethargic faculties as these. He did this on good soil, and with proper care succeeded in making a creation of fat. 36 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Mr. Aiton and his predecessors had a very different and a much more difficult task to perform. That delicate organiza- tion, which is called into operation when the food taken into the body is to be converted into milk, is much more difficult to com])rehend or control. True, there is a certain physical conformation indicative of a large capacity for secreting milk ; but when we remember that this capacity violates all law, and is as erratic as genius, we can comprehend how many diffi- culties they labored under, who, in Scotland, endeavored to establish a breed of milkers. They might secure the bony structure, the quality of skin, the shape of the muscle, the general outline, the form of udder most approved, and, after all this, there might be some deep defect in the powers of assimilating the food, in the glandular system, in the nervous organization, which entirely destroyed the utility of the animal. This accounts for the wide differences which exist in individuals belonging to every well-known and long-established breed of milkers, as the Ayrshires and Jerseys. Thousands of animals are driven from Short-horn and Devon regions, so nearly alike in weight and size and shape, that the law of their reproduc- tion seems to be as fixed as that which gives to the casting the shape of the mould, be it repeated times innumerable. But no one can find a race of milkers, all brought up to a high standard, and all capable of transmitthig that standard. We approach it, but are often vexed at the unexpected failures. Now it would seem that the great rule to be observed in the rearing of dairy stock, is not to interfere with this delicate organization by the food furnished in early life. Why cannot the system of a heifer be injured by food, so as to disorganize her glandular functions,*as well as the system of a cow, which can be forced into diseased action with the greatest ease; which, in fact, requires constant care, lest in her business of manufacturing milk she may take on disease ? Why may we not, for instance, lay the foundation for garget, long before the udder contains a drop of milk ? We do not feed a milch cow as we do a fatting cow, unless we are willing to run the risk of ruining her. For the wholesale statement so often made that what produces milk will also produce fat, and vice versa, is shown to be wholly unfounded by a comparison of the effect SECRETARY'S REPORT. 37 of roweii hay, brewers' grains, shorts, and green food, with corn meal and oil cake. A cow, moreover, never reaches perfection in her line until she has arrived at maturity ; and she must reacli this period of life with all her faculties unimpaired, if we expect her to be as good a cow as nature intended her to be. Slie differs in this respect from the best beef-growing animals, which are mature, as it were, from the start ; and whose organizations, instead of being impaired for their business by generations of high early feeding, are, rather, more and more adapted to it. We all know that the oldest and best families of Short-horns are not remarkable for constitutional elasticity and vigor. They have not great muscular strength, are not nervous and powerful in their action, and are deficient in the procreative faculties. Like the thorough-bred horse, which has also been forced to early maturity and early decay for Inany generations, they have become enervated and constitutionally delicate. High feeding has done this, in both instances ; and as " a short life and a merry one," in the animal, is most profitable to the breeders of beef, and horses fit only for the turf, high feeding has accomplished what was desired — the gain being greater than the sacrifice. Not so, however, with the cow. Her powers mature slowly, and depend very much upon the strength of her constitution. When this is impaired, either by breeding or by feeding, her value is diminished. For in the work of bearing young, and giving milk, in which her whole life is passed, the tax upon her vital forces is such that none but the most robust can endure it. In establishing a dairy breed, therefore, early maturity, with its accompanying evils, is not desirable. On the contrary, it should be avoided, and that mode of feeding should be adopted which will be conducive to health in the individual and in the breed, and which will in no way exhaust the powers or shorten the life of the race. In addition to this, great regard should be had in raising dairy stock, to the effect whicli different kinds of food produce upon the animal economy. Whatever enlarges the bony struc- ture of the female calf, beyond what is necessary for her strength, is worse than useless. A coarse-boned cow rarely reaches that standard of excellence, both in the quantity 38 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. and quality of lier milk, which is attractive to the breeder, or satisfactory to the consumer. So too of fat. Tlie fat-cells, that tissue of the body in which adipose matter is deposited, are found in fat and lean animals alike — the difference consisting in the amount of their contents and their number only. For the supply of fat, certain organs are provided, which are ca})able of receiving all that excess of non-azotized compounds, such as starch, oil, &c., which is con- tained in the alimentary matter taken into the body. Where there is a ready absorption of these compounds into the vessels, fat is produced, especially if with this absorption there is com- bined a vigorous power to generate adipose tissue. "Where they are not absorbed, accumulations of fat do not take place ; and where they are absorbed, without being provided with adipose tissue, they would accumulate injuriously in the blood, if not drawn off by the* liver. Hence it is that in warm climates, where there is diminished excretion through the lungs, and non- azotized food is not got rid of by the respiratory process, the liver is overworked, its function becomes disordered from its inability to separate from the blood all that it should draw off, and these injurious substances accumulating in the blood, " produce various symptoms that are known under the general term bilious." Hence, also, some persons never become fat, however large the quantity of oily matter taken into the stomach ; and it is in such persons that the tendency to disorder of the liver from overwork is most readily manifested ; they are, therefore, obliged to abstain from the use of fat-producing articles of food. It is the power, therefore, to absorb these fat-producing articles of food, and to generate adipose tissue for their recep- tion, that saves the liver from being overtasked, and results in accumulations of fat. The constituents of fat are termed stearine, marzerine, and oleine. We have dwelt upon the production of animal fat, and the organs engaged in its manufacture, in order to show how distinct a part of the animal economy it is, and how naturally the fat-producing functions can be transmitted, independently of all others, and may be cultivated at the expense of all others. The secretion of milk is a very different matter, and is performed by certain glands, whose business it is rather " to SECRETARY'S REPORT. 39 elaborate from the blood certain products, which are destined for special uses in the economy, than to eliminate matters wliose retention in the circulating current would be injurious." These glands, called mammary glands, perform as is supposed tiie chief part of the work of elaborating the elements of milk ; although it is not yet ascertained how much of this elaboration takes place in the blood during its circulation. Be this as it may, the production of milk is a very different busi- ness from the production of fat, and does not result in the combination of the same elements, as are contained in the ^dipose tissue and fat-cells. It is well known, moreover, that the proportion of two, at least, of the principal ingredients of milk, is lial)le to great variation with the circumstances of the animal. Dr. Playfair has ascertained " that the proportion of butter depends in part upon the quantity of oily matter in the food ; and in part upon the amount of exercise which the animal takes, and the warmth of atmosphere in which it is kept. Exercise and cold, by increasing the respiration, eliminate part of the oily matter in the form of carbonic acid and water ; while rest and warmth, by diminishing this drain, favor its passage into the milk. The proportion of casein, on the other hand, is increased by exercise ; which would seem to show that this ingredient is derived from the disintegration of muscular tissue." The experience of every farmer teaches him that an animal which has a large, heavy, muscular development, and is thus furnished with the means of rapid locomotion, is seldom a good milker. Her digestive apparatus is more devoted to her fleshy fibre than to the preparation of milk. The same may be said of fot and bone. So true is this, that among cattle bred expressly for the stall, the females often furnish hardly milk enough to sustain their own offspring ; and in countries where the bone and muscle of the cow are developed by labor, her service in the dairy amounts to but little. It would seem, therefore, that in rearing animals for the dairy, care should be taken that the young are not so fed as to develop a tendency to great size, either in frame or in adipose tissue ; nor so as to establish in the end a race which has every faculty except that of producing milk. We bave all seen how high-feeding of the young has in a few generations, 40 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. and sometimes in one or two, removed from a family of vigor- ous, nervous, muscular and active horses, all traces of those characteristics which have given them value. What they had acquired on the homely fare of their native hills, they lost when brought and bred into greater prosperity. The hard and wiry tendon vanished ; the elastic and well-defined muscle was rounded off into graceful effeminacy ; the carcase and adipose tissue had gained the ascendency, through the aid of good living, and a luxurious life from youth upward. Some of us have seen a promising heifer calf, the offspring of a good milker, pampered in its youth, and fed until it became anv thing but the dairy animal which its ancestry promised. "We would not advocate a deficiency of food for young dairy stock ; but we would argue against an excess of articles of a highly stimulating quality. The plan of tlie Ayrshire farmers is undoubtedly a good one — to take their calves early from the dams, feed them from the dish, and bring them to solid food or pasture as soon as the condition of the young stomach will allow. Instead of linseed meal, they use a great quantity of oatmeal — an article of food much less predisposing to fat, and keeping up a vigorous growth. We have in New England the best quality of English hay as a basis of feeding ; and after the calf is weaned, or after he has had milk enough to give him a fair introduction into life, hay, in the form of hay-tea, and afterwards of rowen, is undoubtedly the best food the animal can have, especially when aided by a few roots, such as turnips or carrots. In some cases milk is abandoned at a very early age, and skimmed milk is advantageously used as a siibstitute. We would not recommend the use of grain, especially that containing a superabundance of oily matter, as Indian corn or linseed, for young dairy stock. Perhaps corn-meal sparingly, or barley or outmeal, may be used in winter, should the animal seem not to thrive well. But a calf that is properly weaned and fed after weaning, and furnished with a good pasture, will be carried through the first winter most satisfactorily on good sweet hay, especially rowen, with roots. In this way can a uniform and well-balanced animal l)e produced, wliich, when put to daii-y service, will not become coarse and raw-boned in her apj3carance, nor take on flesh at the expense of the milk-pail. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 41 COST AND QUANTITY OF FOOD. Of the cost and quantity of food required to carry a calf through the first year of its existence, it is very difficult to make an estimate. There are certain modes of feeding however, the cost of which is easily computed. Take, for instance, the plan adopted by some, as referred to above, of allowing the calf to run with the dam, until it is six months old. Suppose the cow to give the calf eight quarts of milk per day, at the following prices : — 8 quarts at 2 cents per quart for 6 months, . • |26 88 8 " 3 " " " 6 " . . 40 32 8 " 4 " " " 6 " . . 53 76 One or another of these prices milk will command, almost any where, whether sold, or converted into butter and cheese. Take, now, the first estimate, and add to it the cost of keeping during the winter, the articles being estimated in proportion to the price of the milk, and we have — Amount of milk consumed, ..... Hay, during first winter, . . . . . . 5 00 Roots, during first winter, | peck per day for 4 months, at 17 cents per bushel, 3 16 Cost, at one year old, $35 04 From one farmer celebrated for his stock, we have the following mode, with our own estimates, 50 quarts of milk at 2 cents per quart, . . . $1 00 700 quarts of skimmed milk at 1 cent per quart, . 7 00 Pasture, for 5 months, 2 00 Hay, during first winter, 5 00 Roots, during first winter, | peck per day for 4 months, at 17 cents per bushel, 3 16 Cost, at one year old, $18 16 It is well known to cattle breeders that the feeding of the first year is the most expensive and requires the most care. A calf, dropped early in the spring, has consumed nearly as 6* $18 16 3 00 8 00 5 00 10 00 42 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. much in value, when it has arrived at the commencement of its second year's pasturing, as it will during the two following years, or until it is three years old. Taking the last mentioned animal whose cost at one year old, was .... Add second year's pasturage, second year's wintering, . third year's pasturage, third year's wintering, Cost of rearing to three years of age, . . $4-4 16 It is not claimed that these figures represent in all cases the precise cost of rearing an animal. The variations in the price of food in different localities, the different modes of feeding necessary for the various classes of animals raised, and the kinds of food used, all modify to a considerable extent the expense involved in the business of feeding. We have given what seems to be an average of the cost ; and it is for those who furnish good animals for the dairy, for the butcher, for the stall, or for work, to judge of the profits to be made, after considering the value of the manure, and the fact that on every farm there is almost always a certain quantity of unmarketable produce, which serves very well as food for young cattle and stores. Neither should we forget that the conversion of farm produce into beef or dairy products, is, in remote sections, where trans- portation is difficult, the most convenient and profitable mode of disposing of it. QUANTITY OF FOOD. Of the quantity of food required for feeding animals, it is equally difficult to judge, with any satisfactory precision. No two farmers feed precisely alike ; and no two writers agree exactly in their estimate of the amount of food required by cattle. We are told by one that ten pounds of English hay, half a bushel of roots, and two quarts of corn-meal, or oil-cake or cotton-seed, is sufficient food for a milch cow per day, during the winter. Another claims to have fed satisfactorily on eight pounds of hay, with a bushel of roots, and two quarts of meal, or four of shorts. Another estimates fifteen pounds of hay, with half a bushel of roots, or two quarts of meal, as the most SECRETARY'S REPORT. 43 economical mode of feeding. Calculations have been made of the ratio between the weight of the animal and the amount of food required, which, although having the appearance of accu- racy, must be modified by circumstances connected with the condition of the animal, and the care which it receives. It is acknowledged, that warmth, quiet, and comfort are essential to economical feeding ; and we should not lose sight, therefore, in making our calculations, of the skill of the feeder, the tem- perature of the climate, and the protection afforded the animal. There is one rule, which, every judicious, observing and intelli- gent farmer can observe with safety ; and that is, to feed enough of whatever is given, to keep cattle in thriving condition, taking care to keep them warm, clean, free from vermin, and giving them their food regularly and in fixed quantities. Of the more artificial modes of feeding, it may be proper to make some comparative estimates ; we refer especially to soiling' and steaming-. SOILING. We submit the following estimate of the comparative expense of soiling and pasturing twenty cows, from June 1st to November 15th — five and one-half months. In making this estimate, we have taken seventeen acres of land — the amount specified for this purpose by the advocates of soiling. We have considered, that land, in condition to support these cattle, would yield two tons of hay to the acre. We have estimated the price of pasture land at the average rates for good land of this description, and have allowed four acres of this land for the support of each cow. We have endeavored to take the usual expense of a man per month, inckiding his board ; and have allowed for the manure, all that is claimed for it. We consider that a good pasture will support cattle properly ; and have omitted all comparisons of the health of animals confined and at large in the summer season, and of the quality of the milk yielded under the different circumstances. We have estimated the cost of pas- turing rather above the average, and have charged no expense of litter, ttc, against soiling. Land required for soiling 20 cows from June 1st to November loth, 5} months, 17 acres. . , 00 00 $450 00 200 00 $2,400. . $144 10 $250 00 • • $154 00 44 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Value of hay grown on land, 34 tons, at $10 per ton, standing, $340 00 Labor of feeding, &c., one man, at $20 per month, . 110 00 Aggregate expenses of soiling, Or. By manure, as estimated, Net expenses of soiling, . Pasture, 80 acres at $30 per acre, Interest on cost of pasture, Repairs, annual, on fences, vater,* . - - Dudley, 57 $57 00 Pembroke, 45 45 00 Fitchburg, . 61 61 00 Plymouth, . 151 155 00 Gardner, 4 4 00 Plympton, . • - Grafton, 78 78 00 Rochester, 53 57 00 Hardwick, . - - Scituate, 30 30 00 Harvard, - - South Scituat J, . . 59 63 00 Holden, 53 63 00 Wareham,* . . - Hubbardston, 46 50 OO West Bridge'w 'ater, . 8 8 00 Lancaster, . Leicester, 55 90 55 00 Totals, . . 1,247 $1,325 15 90 00 Suffolk ( ;)OUNTY. Leominster, . 84 88 00 Boston, . . 802 $894 00 Lunenburg, . - - Chelsea, 81 85 00 Mendon,* . - - North Chelsea , . . 4 4 00 Milford, 7 7 00 Winthrop,* . . - Millbury, New Braintree, . 83 33 83 00 Totals, . 887 $983 00 33 00 "Worcester County. Northborough, 30 30 00 Ashbumham, 46 $46 00 Northbridge, 20 20 00 Athol, . 5 5 00 North Brookfield, 80 84 00 Auburn, 45 45 00 Oakham, 42 42 00 Barre, . 31 31 00 Oxford, 97 109 00 Berlin, . 1 1 00 Paxton, 24 28 00 Blackstone, IG 16 00 Petersham, . 43 43 00 Bolton, . 66 74 00 Phillipston, . 20 20 00 Boylston, 37 37 00 Princeton, . 42 42 00 Brook£eld, 41 41 00 Royalston, . 26 30 00 Charlton, 2 2 00 Rutland, 3 3 00 Clinton, 97 113 00 Shrewsbury, 24 24 00 Dana, . 5 5 00 Southborough, 66 66 00 * No return. 72 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. CITIES AND TOWNS. to o 1 CITIES AND TOWNS. o 0 t • d d 55 Worcester — Con. Worcester — Con. Southbridge, 74 $74 GO Webster, 51 S55 00 Spencer, 94 94 00 Westborough, 79 87 00 Sterling, • 4 4 00 West Boy ston, 80 80 00 Sturbridge, . 74 74 00 West Brookfield, 45 45 00 Sutton, 94 110 00 Westminster, 46 51 00 Templeton, . 25 25 00 i Winchendon, - Upton, .... 64 10 68 00 10 00 Worcester, . Totals, . 625 717 00 Uxbridge, 3,005 S3,294 00 Warren, 80 84 00 Mr. Grennell presented the following REPORT ON THE WASTES OF THE FARM. While agricultural essays, commonly treat of some special subject to the advancement of which the efforts of the writer are wholly directed, or are of a general discursive nature, never failing to set forth brightly the beauties of an agricultural life, it may seem an unusual, and an ungracious task in us to draw out somewhat the otlier side of the picture ; to sliow some of the obstructions, impediments, annoyances and mistakes to which the farmer is subjected, either by the operations of nature, his predecessors, his neighbors, or himself; and in a form different from any which has come to our notice, to men- tion the various " wastes of the farm," the cause, the means, and the loss, so far as we can, with perhaps some suggestions as to their prevention. In discussing so limillcss and varied a subject, we have taken our materials from every reliable source within our reach, without any particular credit or reference to the authors. Starting with the postulate, that the profession of agriculture is of prime importance, as being the support of all other trades, occupations and professions, how earnestly should we labor to bring it, and ourselves as its exponents, to the higliest standard SECRETARY'S REPORT. 73 of skill and excellence. Have we done this, or any thing like it ? Do we, although engaged in what is confessedly the most important, as it is the most wide-spread occupa- tion, prepare ourselves for its pursuit with a care at all to be compared to its magnitude, or to that bestowed by those following any other branch of legitimate useful business ? Do we, like the professional man, fit ourselves by a long course of study and examination of principles and prece- dents ? Like the manufacturer, do we calculate carefully the first cost of the raw material, the exact expenditure of time and labor, thereby so ascertaining the value by the cost, and thereby regulating the market ? Or do we proceed with that method, that directness of purpose, that certainty of accomplishing certain results by certain operations, which makes the mechanic successful and prosperous ? With the negative which rises in response to these questions, we are perhaps told that all these things are not practicable, if possible. It is true that there are certain conditions and elements which are beyond our control ; the soil, the climate, sunshine or shade, heat and cold, dryness or moisture, cannot be much affected by our efforts ; but under that gracious guaranty that " seed time and harvest shall not fail," do we strive as much as in us lies to attain any high degree of. exactness or perfection, in our profession of farming ? Granted that our climate is cold ; that our land does not spontaneously produce the food that nurtures, or the garments that cover us ; that our soil, naturally unfertile, is worn and exhausted ; that our houses and buildings, many of them, are old, cold and uncomfortable ; and that our means for extensive repairs and improvements are limited ; — with all these odds against us, do we yet accomplish all we might, to improve ourselves and our condition ? Do we not find at the very outset a leading cause of loss or waste in the want of education, method and system in manag- ing the farm so as to know the cost and profits of each branch of farming? Is there not an entire lack of accuracy in the details of the business, which of course renders any statement of results or experiments uncertain ? For instance, a farmer calling a piece of land two acres, (it may be one and three- fourths or two and one-fourth acres,) hauls upon it so many cartloads of manure, not knowing whether his cart holds thirty 10* 74 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. or forty-five bushels. This he ploughs in, as lie thinks, eight inches deep, (probably it is six ;) he plants a proper amount of corn about tliree and one-half feet apart each way. He culti- vates and hoes as usual, but not keeping any memoranda, he is luiable to say exactly how much labor was bestowed on the piece, having forgotten whether the hands worked whole days, or only parts, at that time. "When the crop is nearly ready to harvest, with a neighbor he paces off a square rod, as nearly as they can, for an average ; the corn is picked, shelled, spread on a garret floor for a week, till he calls it dry, (though from that time till it is merchantable it will shrink fifteen per cent.,) measured up, and the product of the whole field calculated from it. Then with the assistance of " the boys," he estimates as near as he can, the amount of labor expended, and so makes to the " Committee on Grain Crops," a statement of a very large crop at a very small cost. And this is called an experi- ment, and claims a premium. This occurs every year in almost every society in the Commonwealth. Of how little value is such an experiment ; and yet, is it not common ? is it not a fair specimen of the experiments and opinions of farmers gener- ally ? How few there are who can state with any precision the cost of any crop, or animal ; the value of their milk ; the quantity required to make a pound of butter or of cheese ; the value of the skimmed milk for calves or pigs ; the comparative, much less the positive value of different grains, roots and fodder for milk, flesh or wool, separately or together ? Does it seem an undeniable proposition that one knowing these facts accurately, or approximating to them in his examinations, must, other things being equal, farm to a better advantage tlian one who without special attention pursues the course his father took, or varies from that only on some uncertain guess ? What a great advantage to have in one's barn a platform scale, on which hay, grain and stock might be weighed ! What a decided advantage a farmer, who was feeding stock, would have in being able from time to time to weigh his cattle, and by weigh- ing and measuring what they ate, to know how they gained the fastest, and when it was time to sell ! It would be very satisfactory to weigh one's grain when selling or sending to mill. Then a convenient arrangement for weighing milk, is most desirable ; a change of food frequently making a very decided change SECRETARY'S REPORT. 75 t in the quantity of milk, which the farmer ought to know, especially in a State where the sale of milk is so extensive as with us, amounting to over eight hundred thousand dollars annually. Every farmer would find it not only pleasant, but also useful for reference from one year to another, if he would daily note down his farm operations, and perhaps the weather. We know how averse farmers are to writing, but this would not require much penmanship in one of the cheap but useful " diaries " of the day. Besides, in many farmers' families of the present time, there is some one more ready to write than to work ; the young women now will sooner pen than spin ; work crochet better than butter ; and work at the piano, we will not say better, but a good deal more than at the wash-tub or ironing- board. Let such keep the diary. We quote some pertinent remarks by a distinguished friend of agriculture, Rev. H. Colman : " Few farmers keep any accounts whatever ; those who do keep them, and are very competent to instruct the community, suffer their modesty or diffidence to overbalance the claims of the public good, which might be essentially served by the exhibition of faithful and exact accounts. More atten- tion should be paid to this in the schools ; it would prove of rather more practical importance than to be able to work embroidery and paint artificial flowers, to understand the geography of the moon, and learn from a wood-cut all its continents and volcanoes. It is to be added that agricultural operations seldom admit of that exactness of account which belongs to mercantile transactions, and that it is in most cases only an approximation to accuracy which can be expected. The importance of this subject to the farmer cannot be over- stated, and should not be overlooked. Farmers cannot be too strongly urged to keep exact and faithful accounts with their farms, their animals, and every crop which they raise. It would immensely assist the improvement of their farms and their own personal comfort and self-respect. It would enable them to decide intelligibly, and with confi- dence what they had best cultivate, and what avoid ; it would reveal to them their true condition, the knowledge of which is essential to their safety, and sometimes save them from embar- rassment, bankruptcy and ruin. Accurate accounts of expenses, 76 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. < capital employed, labor applied, seeds, utensils, improvements, products, and final results, are as important in agricultural as in mercantile transactions. Of all the wastes upon a farm, perhaps there is none more apparent than that of manures ; none more deserving of reprobation, because none other is so generally and directly prejudicial to success in farming, and none other of any thing like the same extent can be so easily prevented. The farmer, somewhat in imitation of the old orator, speaking under differ- ent circumstances, if asked what were the three essentials necessary to success in farming, might reply: first, manure; second, manure; third, manure. It is, indeed, the great motive-power in all agricultural operations, especially in the worn and naturally unfertile soils of New England ; good and clean cultivation is very important, but without a soil containing the elements of growth, it will avail nothing, and these can only be created or kept up by the constant application of manures. These constitute directly, or assist indirectly, the supply of nearly all the nourishment of vegetable life, while it is these, which, produced chiefly from the decay of animal and vegetable matter, combine most powerfully to give new life and vigor to every form of vegetable existence that springs from the bosom of the earth, by the operations of nature, or artificial application. The acorn from which sprang " the oak, the brave old oak," may be traced back in its germination to the fertilizing properties, and the warmth caused by the fermenta- tion and decay of the leaves and the grass among which it chanced to fall. Nourished and strengthened by this natural manure, it has grown and stretched its great arms abroad, till it is styled the monarch of the forest, and now by the annual decadence of its leaves, adds its annual deposition of fertilizing material to the soil beneath, which in part is again absorbed by- its own roots. The golden-eared corn owes its beauty and its vitality to the manure prudently placed beneath the hill. The smallest seeds of all the grasses, and of every herb for the use of man, stretch out their tiny rootlets for the food scattered by nature, or spread by the hand of man. Since, then, manures are of such all-controlling consequence in agriculture, how carefully should we study into their nature and composition ; how faithfully should wo labor to increase by every means the SECRETARY'S REPORT. 77 production of them ; how jealously sliould we guard against their waste ; and how closely should we watch the effects produced by their various application ! Manures possess different degrees of power, partly from their inherent richness, and partly from the rapidity with which they throw off their fertilizing ingredients to assist the growth of plants. These are given oflf by solution in water, and in the form of gas, the one as a liquid manure, which, running down into the soil, is absorbed by the fine roots, and the other escaping mostly into the atmosphere to be caught by the ever-breathing leaves, or ascending far up, is again brought back to earth by the descending rain or snow. Tlie great art of saving and manu- facturing manure, consists in retaining and applying to the best advantage these soluble and gaseous portions. The farmer who should so grossly neglect his crops, either during the cultiva- tion or at the harvest, as to lose or waste one-half, would be scouted at, and almost condemned as criminal ; yet how many farmers are there passing for good farmers, who annually lose one-half their manure by neglect ; how common is it to neglect the means on which the success of the crop depends ! A waste of manure is a waste of the elements, and renders it impossible to realize from the land what one ought in tlie present, and destroys all prospect of success in the future. One of the most important things, then, to which we can give our attention, is to prevent the waste of manure, and to add all we possibly can to our stock. By the census of 1860, it appears that there are in the Com- monwealth 84,327 barns. The Secretary of the Board of Agri- culture estimates the quantity of manure at five cords to each, worth three dollars per cord, making a total of $1,204,905. If we assume what appears to be liberal, that one-fourth of the barns have cellars, it follows that three-fourths of this manure is exposed to atmospheric and other deteriorating influences. Many competent persons estimate the loss from this cause at one-half, but if it is only one-third, we show a waste from the exposure of the solid manure of $321,635 per annum. But this is not all. When the manure is thrown out exposed, it is nearly impossible to save the liquid portion, which, according to Dr. Dana and the authorities he quotes, is nearly or quite equal to the solid excrements of neat cattle. 78 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. According to these data then, the loss of the liquid manure would be three-fourths of one-half of the value of the solid, which would be 84:59,335. There is then an aggregate waste in this State in the matter of manure from barns alone of $780,074, which might and ought to be saved, and when in addition to this is added the loss of other manurial substances, the bones, shells, soap-suds, and other slops from the house, night soil, etc., it is probable that the farmers of this State allow to waste more manure than they use. The loss of manure exposed to the weather is both by evapo- ration and by drainings from the dung-heaps, which, containing the most valuable part of the manure, arc allowed to run perhaps into the highway or a brook. The dung is often thrown out of the stable on to sloping land, or left exposed to all weathers in the yard for a long time. Heavy showers of rain, falling upon manures thus exposed, must necessarily, by washing out the soluble portions, greatly depreciate its value. It is well known that the dark-colored liquids, which flow from badly kept dung-heaps, in rainy weather, possess high fertilizing properties. According to the quantity of rain that falls at the time of collecting these drainings, according to the character of the manure and similar modifying circumstances, the composi- tion of the draining of dung-heaps is necessarily subject to great variations. An examination of several specimens of the drainings of dung-heaps, when analyzed by Professor Yoclcker, at the Royal Agricultural College at Cirencester, shows a large amount of fertilizing elements most desirable to retain. Humic and ulmic acids are both products of the decay of carbonaceous organic matter ; and their abundance in the drainings of dung-heaps is easily explained by the decomposition of the straw and other excrementitious matter ; in combination with potash, soda, and ammonia, humic and nlmic acids form dark-colored, readily-soluble salts ; the dark brown color of the drainings, then, is an indirect proof of the existence in them of potash, ammonia or soda. It is also worthy of note that while the affinity of humic acids for ammonia is sufficiently strong to completely prevent its escape at the ordinary temperature, it suffers a change at a slightly elevated temperature, in consequence of Avhich ammonia escapes. Both the solid and liquid excrements SECRETARY'S REPORT. 79 contain salts and phosphates, which the rain and melting snows render soluble, while they wash thcni away ; they con- tain a good deal of ammonia, and are rich in alkaline salts, especially the more valuable salts of potash, and in desirable organic matter. Manure depreciates very fast by being sufifered to lie in the yard. Professor Voelcker found by accurate experiments, that manure lying in the yard exposed to all weathers, lost in value two-thirds ; only one-third remaining in one year. Manure may be carted and spread directly on the land, if there is any clay or loam in its composition, but the worst possible method is to haul out manure and leave it in small heaps on the field ; the opinion seems to be gaining ground that the best application of manure is to spread it on the land in the fall. The saving of both solid and liquid manure is a great argument in favor of soiling cows, which ought to be practiced on hundreds of farms in this Commonwealth, where now the cows find but an insufficient pasture. If the pastures were fed to sheep, or young stock, and the cows kept in the stable all the time, and fed with green food daily cut, the pastures would be better, the sheep and young stock would be good, the cows would be in better condition, give more and better milk, and an immense saving would be made of manure now wasted. All the manure which is dropped in the pasture would of course be saved ; and also the liquid manure with a little care and labor, by keeping constantly behind the cows muck, loam, or some other absorbant. Farmers generally are not aware of the value of this last. Johnston and Sprengel, learned agricultural chemists, say that a cow annually voids about 16,800 pounds of urine, which contains 961 pounds of solid matter quite equal in value to Peruvian guano at $60 per ton, making the annual commercial value of the liquid manure of the cow to be $28.83 ; no inconsiderable proportion of her whole value ; a cord of loam saturated with urine, is equal to a cord of the best rotted dung. The manure from the poultry, if they are confined, is as good as guano, and should not be wasted ; that from the house is the most valuable, and if mixed with fresh loam is completely deodorized. There are many substances wasted whiSh would make rich fertilizers. There is much from every factory and mill, and from 80 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. families. Bones, if thrown into a barrel and covered with ashes and moistened, will after a while, become decomposed, so as to form, with the ashes, a valuable fertilizer, and well worthy of practice in the making. Hard coal ashes, if screened thor- oughly, are worth saving, and hauling a short distance to spread on grass land, containing some lime, and some wood ashes remaining from the kindlings, and charcoal. Wood ashes form one of the most valuable of all fertilizers, and ouglit to be saved with jealous care, and are, at the common prices, a safer fertilizer than any other to be purchased. The deterioration of pastures comes in as a prominent waste, and is one which for years has engaged the attention of thinking men in the Commonwealth, with less action, and less knowledge how to act, than in any other branch of farming operations. We have elaborate treatises on mowing, tillage and grain lands, and crops ; boastful reports of some one solitary acre, that has yielded over a hundred bushels of corn, while perhaps the rest of the farm suffered for the benefits of that favorite acre. We have minute directions as to the best method of ploughing, making hay, raising crops, feeding stock, improving swamp lands, but seldom any practical and proved method of improving pastures. We have all heard of the nameless man who " makes two blades of grass grow where one grew before," but he would seem to have confnied his attention to grass for hay. A marked exception to this charge, however, is an able article in the Transactions of the old Massachusetts Society by its then Sec- retary, from which we shall quote : " Although much has been said, of late, upon the necessity and importance of restoring fertility to our pastures, but little practical information has been offered as to the best and most economical methods of attaining that object. We seem to be afraid to look the evil in the face and to measure the extent of it ; a feeling of discour- agement seems to come over us whenever we meet to talk about it, and many of our most intelligent farmers seek temporary palliation merely, or else abandon their pastures to their fate, leaving them to go back to their original condition of bush and forest." The land usually appropriated to grazing purposes has been that which, from its position or its soil, or from tlic combined causes, is considered the least available for cultivation. Hilly SECRETARY'S REPORT. 81 ground difficult to work, swamps not easily drained, and soils encumbered with rocks, comprise a large portion of the perma- nent pastures of New England. Besides this, many farmers have been in the habit of cultivating their smoother land as long as it would bear a remunerating crop, applying as little manure as could be got along with, and then laying it down to rye, oats, or barley, so as to get the last ounce of nutriment from the soil. This having been pretty thoroughly accom- plished, a crop or two of hay is taken from it, and the land is then abandoned in a famishing state, for a number of years, to pasture. From land thus treated cattle are expected to derive their support for four or jfive months ; they go to it in lean con- dition in May, and come from it at the end of October, as lean as they went out. Some of the more obvious reasons for the decline and waste of pastures, that were originally in good condition as such, may be mentioned, as 1. Over-stocking. 2. Turning into the same field every variety of stock, sheep, horses, neat cattle, young and old together, by which the pastures are fed. 3. Allowing bushes, brambles, and all foul stuff to grow to the destruction of feed, especially of the finer grasses. The mere statement of these causes of evil naturally suggests the remedies. Pasture-lands are considered as profitable, paying a large interest on the amount invested, and hence the temptation to crowd into the grazing ground all the farmer's own creatures, and as many on hire as may be offered by others ; this, of course, is done in the spring, without consid- eration of what may be the supply of feed through a dry summer following. If the pasture is newly laid down, this excessive feeding will be lastingly injurious, and under all circumstances is very hurtful. The creatures thus depastured may live through the season, but will fail in growth if young, and in flesh if intended for a market. Every beast should be kept in a rapidly growing and fattening condition, whether old or young. If this is not so there is an error somewhere, and it will generally be found in the too great number in the field. Pastures should be so 11* 82 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. sparinjily stocked that the cattle kept upon them, before winter sets in, can be driven home in good condition for winter fare. But to tlie effect of over-stocking upon the pasture itself, and by consequence upon the whole concerns of the farm. If fed down close, the roots of the grass and herbage arc first exposed, perhaps to the burning heat of a dry summer, greatly to their injury, and perhaps in a following winter to frosts of extreme severity : thus the destruction of a great proportion of the grass-roots is completed, the finer grasses are killed out, and the coarser and less fattening rendered more worthless. It must be some years before such pastures can )jc recovered, by great care and judicious treatment. Resulting from this over- stocking is the damaging but too common practice of many farmers of removing their cattle from the pastures in the fall, and turning them into the mow-fields after the crops have been gathered, where they remain till they are housed for the winter. Let the first motto be, feed your pastures sparingly. But not only are pastures injured by over-stocking with cattle, but there is a constant tendency to deterioration from the increasing growth of bushes, weeds, and foul stuff, that deform the land and destroy the feed ; the best lands are subject to this evil, and there they will make the greatest encroachments. The first step should be to attack the bushes, briars, sweet-ferns, brakes, hard-hacks, and all sorts of worthless stuff", with the brush-scythe and bog-hoe. These pests, we hardly need to say, destroy the nutritious quality of the grasses, they shade and sour the feed, and exhaust the land. Destroy them, or they will destroy the land. Coarse herbage will gradually displace the fine and more nutritious kinds ; briars and bushes come next in nature's rotation, to be succeeded at last by the forest, to which almost all lands tend. The farmer has therefore a con- , tinual struggle against this natural law of vegetation, unless he wishes, like the land he cultivates, to return also to his primal condition. This work of extermination is to be repeated once a year, or at least every other year, till the work is finished. There is no better time for tins good and profitable labor than some of the last days of August. After a few years these pests will disappear. But this is not enough ; some further means of improving pastures may be applied, about which diversity of opinion and practice exists. Something fertilizing must be SECRETARY'S REPORT. 83 employed in some way. In looking back through the ten years of the published Transactions of tlie Board, we find but few experiments in this branch of farming, and those mostly are of breaking up and reclaiming pasture-land. Now we believe that through the Commonwealth, as a general thing, ploughing up and seeding pasture-lands would be impracticable and inju- dicious : impracticable, because the best pasture-lands would to a very great extent be unassailable by the plough ; and injudicious, because old pastures, if well kept, are decidedly more nutritious, more fattening, more permanent, and, in com- mon phrase, " sweeter feed." After a pasture is made clean of brush and foul stuff, it will for some time, if lightly stocked, remain in good condition ; but if reduced by ill usage, it must, we think, be restored by fertilizers applied on the surface. Top-dressing with manure is genei-ally out of the question ; there is none to spare from the mowing and tillage, and tlie expense of hauling it on to pastures, even if there were a sufficiency, would make it impracticable. We believe from our own experience and observations and from that of others, that plaster, ashes, and in some cases guano, may be used with suc- cess ; three to five hundred pounds of plaster alone, or a less quantity mixed with ashes in the proportion of two bushels of ashes to one of plaster, or of perhaps twenty bushels of ashes alone to the acre, will in most cases revive and renew the pas- ture, bringing in the white and red clover, and the finer and more fattening grasses. It may be necessary to continue this for two or three years, but we believe that it will be a good investment, doubling the capacity of the pasture for cattle. Tlie Hon. Henry W. Cushman, of Bernardston, a most care- ful and methodical man, and earnest in promoting the agricul- ture of his county, reported to the Franklin County Agricultural Society in 1858 the results of certain experiments on pasture- lands, for which he received the Society's premium. The land was an old worn out pasture, on argillaceous slate, sloping to the east at about twenty degrees, covered with a very light shading of poor grass and pennyroyal. Upon equal plots were sown guano at the rate of 160 pounds, $4.80 per acre ; plaster at the rate of 320 pounds or four bushels, 81.60 per acre ; unlcached ashes at the rate of ten bushels, costing ^2 to the acre, May 16, 1858. Tlie effect of the guano was the quickest, 84 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. showing very fresh and green, and more than doubling the feed in the early part of the season, but it did not seem to hold out. The plaster gave a great increase during the middle and latter part of the season, and late in the autumn looked green and fresh. Clover also sprang up, and the quality of the grass was much improved. The ashes did not apparently produce much effect in the early part of the season, but after June the grass and clover came in thick and fresh, and continued so all the season ; late in the year the grass improved most, and the cattle seemed to prefer the grass on that piece. The conclusion is, that plaster and ashes are valuable renovators of pasture-lands, guano at the cost less so. But perhaps there is no readier and more profitable way to remedy this waste of pastures than by turning sheep upon them. In reply to the inquiry in .the circulars issued by the Board two years ago — Whether pasture-lands were improved by sheep — there was a unanimous affirmative. We cannot on this sub- ject do so well as to quote from the article of Mr. Fay before mentioned. " Our own observation and experience has fully confirmed the correctness of the returns in this respect. We have constantly under our eye an hundred acre lot, upon which cattle a few years ago could not live, that now maintains in good condition a large flock of sheep ; and the improvement of the pastures has been so great, that a dozen head of cattle besides the sheep do well on it. The reasons for this are obvious to any one who has observed the habits of sheep : they are more indiscriminate feeders than cattle ; they nip the shoots of almost every shrub as well as weed, extirpating many kinds in the course of two or three years ; they make room in this way for the grasses to come in where they have been shadowed out or otherwise displaced ; the white weed, the broom, or wood waxen, as it is commonly termed, the golden rod, the black- berry vine, the blueberry, with many other similar plants, dis- appear before them, and the finer grasses and white clover take their place. This, however, is only one of the advantages which sheep possess upon pastures which arc impoverished ; they scatter their manure in the way to produce the largest benefits ; beside which, it possesses in the highest degree the requisites essential for restoring to the land the phosphates which it loses by long depasturing with cattle. The manure of SECRETARY'S REPORT. 85 the sheep, too, sufifers no waste, being in a highly concentrated form ; and at the same time, it is minutely divided and evenly distributed over the surface of the ground. " So good and economical distributors of manure are sheep, that experienced farmers in England are feeding tliem, when in the pasture, with oil-cake, for the additional benefit from the manure." For the purpose of seeing if our pastures would show by figures, as profitable as we suppose them to be, we have made some calculations as nearly as any reported facts will give. The whole number of acres of pasture-land in the Common- wealth is 1,326,239, the average value of which according to the last valuation would be |1G per acre, making the pasture lands worth $21,219,824, the interest of which would be $1,273,189. The returns which our pastures yield us, we have tried to ascertain in two different ways, one, to call the pastur- ing at the usual paying price for all the stock in the Common- wealth, which we can get with any correctness ; the sheep, steers and heifers, and milch cows ; oxen must be left out of the calculation, as there are no data by which to separate the working oxen, which are not much grazed, from those being turned out for beef; this also does not include any of the horse kind, of which many are pastured a part or the whole of the season. Pasturing 92,288 steers & heifers 25 weeks, at 25c, 1345,980 00 " 113,110 sheep 30 weeks, at 2^0., . . 84,832 50 " 160,982 cows 20 weeks, at 33"'c., . . 1,062,481 20 Total rents of pastures, (not including oxen and horses,) $1,493,293 70 We have attempted in another imperfect manner to calculate the profits from pasturing. Gain on 92,288 steers and heifers in pastures annually, $6 each, $533,728 00 One-half value wool grown, .... 62,210 00 One-half of the value (not quantity) of milk sold, 404,722 00 86 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Value of all the cheese made, .... 8502,590 00 One-half of the butter, (having deducted the value of cheese,) 057,753 00 Total products of pastures, (not including oxen and horses,) $2,181,003 00 If these figures are correct they will justify all we have claimed as to the importance of pasture-lands. The mode of treatment of wood-lands is subject to criticism as a waste, and is of very great importance to the farmers of the State. It was the prevailing opinion forty years ago, that wood was fast disappearing, and that within fifty years the country would be almost denuded of its woody covering, and that the article would become of great scarcity and value. At that time the practice was universal to thin out the wood lots, by cutting here and there a tree as they appeared super- abundant, or began to decay. Wood so thinned out rarely sprouts out again, or if it does, is likely to be broken down by the subsequent fall of trees, and thus our timber lands would be gradually disappearing, and no young wood lots growing up to fill the vacancy. But a change of policy, has produced a change of prospect with regard to wood. The practice of cutting clean as one goes, or clearing the land of timber at once, and making way for a new growth to spring up, has demonstrated the fact that we have nothing to fear as to a further supply of wood. Tlie subject of planting wood has been a question of discus- sion among agriculturists, and in some localities it may be worthy of attention, but at present it cannot be said to be a matter of general interest. But the proper management of young wood lots is worthy of attention. "When a lot of timber land is to be cleared, if the wood is not too old, and tlie land is adapted or natural to wood, a growth will spring up, exceeding perhaps ten or twenty times the num- ber of trees that can naturally grow to much size on the ground. Some individuals in view of this fact have taken an early SECRETARY'S REPORT. 87 opportunity to tliiii out all tlie superabundant trees, leaving no more to grow than sufficient to make a thrifty full-grown wood lot. An observation of years has already shown that this is a wrong policy, and established the fact that nature provides her own remedy for this excess, and applies it in the most successful and advantageous manner. When trees stand thick together, they can grow only m one direction, right straight upwards ; which is the direction we all like to have a timber tree grow. The limbs as they become shaded, die off, and as the more ■vigorous shoots overtop the weaker ones, they gradually die out and this process goes on, till no more trees are left than can successfully grow on the ground. The soil in the mean time is kept shaded and moist, and tlie dead branches and leaves fall down and decay, making the proper manure for the trees, thus securing the most rapid and healthy growth, height and erectncss of the timber. The opposite policy produces an opposite result ; by thinning out the trees, the lateral growth of the limbs and tlie trees have a tendency to grow in the shape of a pasture oak. The ground becomes hard and dry, the decayed leaves will be blown away from the roots of the trees ; the sun and wind harden the bodies of the trees, and they become stunted, dwarfed, and prematurely decay. Striking instances of this have come under our observation, when the same lot of young wood was divided by a sale to different men, and the let-alone policy adopted on one part and the thinning and trimming out on tlie other. Twenty years made a difference of nearly one-half in favor of the former. Let the young wood lots alone. Keep out the cattle, and do not feel that you are suffering loss because you see a few decayed trees that might furnish fuel if taken out ; the damage done by the teams and by the effects suggested above, will more than equal the value of the little supplies you will add to your wood-pile. These suggestions are the result of observation, now some- what protracted. There is a great want of economy in the cutting, preparing and burning wood for fuel. In some parts of the Common- wealth peat is burned, and in the cities and towns coal has 88 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. become cheaper, and is commonly used, but having no coal veins in this State, wood must always be the farmer's fuel. Careful experiments have shown that the amounts of dry wood necessary to throw out a given heat were as follows : Hickory, 4 cords ; White Oak, 4f ; Hard Maple, Gf ; Soft Maple, 74 ; Pine, 9^ — each equal to 4 tons Anthracite coal. If the heat were all saved, one pound of good dry seasoned wood would raise 27 pounds of water from' freezing to the boiling point. The loss is in not saving the heat and in burning green wood. It has been found that the most thoroughly seasoned wood at common temperature contains about -^^^ of water. But green wood contains about 35 per cent, of water, and the farmer who hauls in 20 cords of green wood draws 20 tons or 125 barrels of water, and in burning it green loses heat enough in evapo- rating the sap to boil about 12,000 gallons of water. Wood will season best under cover and well ventilated ; if wood is hauled up green in the winter, it should be prepared so that the winds of March and April and May may season it before it is piled away ; and every farmer ought to have a wood- shed large enough to hold a year's supply of dry wood, and never allow green wood to be burned. Not only the economy of the farm requires this, but especially is it demanded for the comfort and convenience of the women of the farmer's household. We asked a few weeks since an intelligent young farmer to name a principal waste in farming ; he replied that to one riding through the country he thought the waste in fences would be one of the most prominent. This is undoubtedly true, not only in appearance to the casual observer but also to the critical, close examiner. The amount of loss by expense of making and maintaining unnecessary fence is enormous, besides the amount of waste land under and directly adjoining them. We have no exact data by which to estimate the amount of fencing in this State, or the expense. We have, however, made calculations in two ways. Careful estimates have been made of the fencing in Pennsylvania and in Maine. Pennsylvania had, in 1850, one hundred and twenty-eight thousand farms, and the cost of the fencing in the State was S105,600,000 ; the interest of which is ^$6, 336,000. Maine had forty-seven thou- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 89 sand farms. Her fences had cost !i)25,000,000 ; the repairs requh'e $2,500,000 annually; six percent, interest is $1,500,000, and a renewal once in twenty years would be -11,250,000, making the total yearly expense <|5,250,000. Now Massachu- setts has thirty-four thousand farms, and we get at the amount of fencing in two ways, by which we arrive at very nearly the same results. By taking about the average cost of fencing on each farm in Pennsylvania and also in Maine, about $700, and multiplying it into the number of farms in Massachusetts, we get about $23,000,000 as the cost of all the farm fences in the Commonwealth. Another way of estimating them is as fallows : We call the average size of improved fields throughout the State not to exceed ten acres, in some counties it is less, in some it may' be more. There being two millions one hundred and thirty-three thousand four hundred and thirty-six acres of improved land in the State, each of the thirty-four thousand farms will have about sixty-two acres, each of which is subdi- vided into enclosures of ten acres each, making two hundred aiid ten thousand eight hundred fields ; the number of rods around a ten-acre lot is one hundred and seventy, which multi- plied by the whole number of fields gives thirty-five million eight hundred and thirty-six thousand rods of fencing, provided each lot was disconnected from any other, but probably two- thirds of the various lots are connected with others, which enclose unimproved land and highways, which are not included in this estimate ; this will reduce the amount about one-third, or to about twenty-three million rods of fencing ; and no one could estimate the fences through the State under a dollar a rod ; a large part, including most of the stone walls, would cost much more than that. The interest at six per cent, on this sum would be $1,380,000 ; if we add to that, repairs annually ten per cent., or $2,300,000, and the cost of renewal at the end of twenty years of one-half the whole fencing, we have the enormous sum of $4,250,000 annually for fences, or $125 annually on each and every farm in this Commonwealth. Let us now consider the cost of fencing different-sized fields. On an oblong field of two acres, the fencing will be seventy-six rods, which, at one dollar per rod will cost thirty-eight dollars per acre ; a field of five acres costs twenty-five dollars, ten acres seventeen dollars, one hundred acres five dollars and 12* 90 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. thirty-eight cents per acre. It costs as much to fence a ten- acre lot, as it would to thoroughly undcrdrain it. And these estimates, too, have all been made on the improved land alone of tlie State. But the waste is not merely in the cost of the fences and repairing. A large item is the land occupied by the fence, and worthless, because uncultivated on each side. A large part of our fences is Virginia fence, wliich will measure through the bottom three feet. Bush-riding and staked fences take as much. So that we think that four feet is a moderate estimate for the land under and on both sides of our fejices, wliich is uncultivated, and worse than useless. This would leave on both sides of a fence inclosing ten acres, one and one-fourth acres ; on the twenty-three million rods of fencing in the Commonwealth, thirty-one thousand two hundred and fifty acres of land untilled and unoccupied, a refuge for almost every kind of vermin, that walks, flies, or crawls. Might we not dispense with a large portion of this expensive incumbrance ? Probably about one-eighth, or nearly three million dollars are in fences on the highway, where we are not obliged to fence animals out, but only to keep in those that are properly there. We believe that it is poor economy and poor farming to allow cattle to graze on tillage or mowing lands ; that they ought never to be allowed to run on them ; but that when pastures get short, and fail to furnish a necessary supply, the cattle should receive other feed ; and there is one great advantage of soiling, or keeping cows up the whole season. Besides, pastures would not get short so soon as they do, if they were not overstocked or if they were properly cared for. This course would then only make it necessary to fence the grazing lands ; the division fences between different fields of mowing and tillage being removed, so much time and money might be bestowed on the pastures, which need it badly enough. Now, without going to the full extent of what is here stated, cannot each one see on his own farm how some improvement in this direction may be made, for if our propositions arc true in the whole they are equally so in part. Numerous fences, crooked, irregular and ragged, crossing the farm in every direction, dividing it into lots of all sizes and almost every form, are unsightly as well as expensive. "Where a division fence is necessary, and the material is to be had, there SECRETARY'S REPORT. 91 is nothing equal to a good heavy stone wall ; there are some places where a hedge answers a good purpose, and is both ornamental and useful. Wire fences are also made at a cost !is low as forty cents per rod, though not of sufficient strength to turn cattle, and running from that to $1.50 p^r rod ; iron hurdles are made in sections of six or eight feet long, joined together by a bolt and nut, which are perfectly secure against cattle, for about $2 per rod. Where it is necessary or conven- ient to divide off land for grazing temporarily, hurdles of iron, or movable fences of boards, can be used. There are two or three kinds of these last, for which patents have been secured, which are easily set up or moved, and can be made from seventy- five to eighty cents per rod. Where it is thought best to graze sheep or cows on orcharding, mowing, or on a portion of land that is undivided, this portable fence is very useful and conven- ient, and ought to be brought into more general use. When not wanted it can be easily taken down and stored. It is a waste for any farmer to raise or keep poor stock of any kind. It costs no more to rear a good animal than a poor one ; and it does not cost so much to keep a good one as a poor one ; if an animal is allowed to grow poor it costs much more to put an equal number of pounds on him than if he had been kept thriving : indeed, with a sheep it's almost impossible, the old saying being that " a sheep is never twice fat." Mr. Mechi says, " it is more profitable to buy a half fat or thriving animal than a very lean or half starved one. The latter eats more, is longer getting ripe, and you have less weight to sell with a profit ; but if you purchase a half fat beast at five cents per pound and get him out of hand quickly at six cents per pound, you get twenty per cent, witliout cost on what you bought, and in addi- tion are paid six cents per pound for all the fat you have put on. I feel assured that the best bred animals, although at a greater cost, pay better than those which are coarse, badly bred, ill-shaped, large-headed, and big-boned ; for, make them as fat as you will, they only command a second-rate price." So, too, in breeding is a waste ; farmers are often grossly to blame in not using the best males within their reach for breeding purposes, because, perhaps, it is a mile further off or half a dollar more than an inferior animal owned by some careless neighbor ; and so, for that paltry consideration, they waste their 92 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. stock by never improving it. in this way a man with a pretty good stock will after a while run it out, when he ought to be iuuproving it. He forgets tliat well-bred parents transmit to their offspring more of their own bodily and constitutional qualities than ill-bred ones can. As respects cattle, sheep and horses in this country, in most cases the qualities of the male parent predominate in the offspring, for the reason that the males are better-bred usually, having strong and well estab- lished characteristics, while the ancestors of a badly-bred animal vary in every possible way, and consequently have no distinctive family characteristic. A thorough-bred ram when coupled with an ill-bred ewe marks his peculiar characteristics very plainly upon the offspring. An almost equal waste too is not selecting for breeding purposes the best females of our own stock. How often is it that an old broken down mare, or a cow with great defects is put to breeding because she is fit for nothing else. "When such a course is pursued by breeders of any kind of stock, they must suffer for their own folly and penuriousness. We quote from " Goodale's Principles of Breeding Domestic Animals," a most vf^luable and interesting book, which should be in the hands of every farmer. " The neglect which is too common, and especially in breeding horses to the qualities of the dam, miserably old and inferior females being often employed, cannot be too strongly censured. " In rearing valuable horses the dams are not of less conse- quence than the sires, although their influence upon the progeny be not the same." It is a waste too to sell from the farm the crops raised upon it, and which by the- rules of good husbandry should be consumed upon the place, to make the manure which contains the essential principles for the production of the next crop, without which or its equivalent the naturally unprofitable soils of New England would too faintly respond to the most earnest calls of laborious operations. A story is told of a French priest, who, as was common in his country many years ago, while blessing the fields at the beginning of the season, came to one so wretchedly bad as to stagger even his faith. Closing his book he said to the owner, " my son, blessing will not help this field, it wants manure." SECRETARY'S REPORT. 93 Manure then being an essential element, how are we going to obtain it, except from our domestic animals, that from cattle being better than any fertilizer which can be bought. Guano, super-phosphate of lime, ashes, and plaster, all are good in their places, to cause a quick start, a rapid, luxuriant growth, and an early maturity of the crop ; as an adjunct to barnyard manure they are most valuable, but they are stimulants, and for perma- nent effect they lack the organic and other fertilizing properties of dung. The only object in fattening cattle in Massachusetts at the present time is for the manure. The more meat we make, the more manure we get, the more corn, grain, and other crops we can grow. Without manure we couldn't grow a crop, without the crops we couldn't feed the cattle, without the cattle we couldn't have the manure. The mere statement of this is enough with- out any argument to prove it, and to show us, as Mr. Mcchi says, that a farmer should always send his crops to market on four legs. Hon. John Brooks, of Princeton, one of the most shrewd and observing farmers in this Commonwealth, in a sound article written for the Transactions of the Worcester North Agricultural Society, shows clearly enough that those farmers who draw hay into towns and villages, and haul manure out, make a daily loss by the operation. This brings us, naturally enough, to consider the wastes from want of economy in feeding, watering, sheltering, and the general care of all stock ; a subject sufficient in itself for an extensive essay. Perhaps to the eye of one passing through a farming district in the winter, the most cruel and noticeable waste would seem to be in the insufficient shelter afforded the poor brutes during the inclement season. It is true, and grati- fying to know, that a great improvement in this respect is annually advancing in this State. New, tight barns, with warmer sheds, and great cellars beneath for storing and making manures, filled with deep bays of sweet, early-cut hay, with- stables full of warm, well-fed, contented cattle, quiet and thrifty, are pleasant places to visit. Now the effect of temperature, the necessity of keeping stock warm and comfortable, has been so often proved in this country and England, and is so seldom questioned, that one is astonished to see cattle and milch cows, as well as young stock, standing nearly the whole of a winter's 94 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. day curled up, shivering and wasting their food, by the impos- sibility of keeping warm. It has been demonstrated that cattle laid on a much larger amount of fat in proportion to their consumption of food, during April, May and June, than in the colder months. This is consistent with the well-known fact, that the rapid absorption of caloric by a cold and moist atmosphere, renders necessary a larger quantity of food, to keep up the supply of carbon ; the food is therefore wasted, which, if tlie animal were warmer, would be producing fat. We find the fact so in ourselves ; exposed to cold, in open, unsheltered situations during winter, our appetite increases strangely, while our weight remains unaltered. Mr. Horsefall, wliose admirable essay on dairy stock was published by the Massachusetts Society, and whose dairy is one of the most admirably managed in the kingdom, keeps his stables at about sixty degrees, and neither he nor other good dairymen allow their cows to go out in the cold to drink, as it invariably causes the milk to shrink. It is the opinion of an intelligent dairyman that there is a difference of two quarts of milk a day between a cow comfortably housed, and the same one exposed to the cold for half the day, as we see them. The young stock, too — calves and colts — when allowed good food and sheltered, will be one-third larger in the spring than if turned out to all weathers, with the coarsest and most innutritions food. The experiment of Lord Ducie and Mr. Childers in England a few years since, shows that sheep sheltered in a warm slied ate one-fifth less food, and increased in weight one-third more than another lot of equal number and weight, with precisely the same food, fed in the open air. A pen of sheep on Lord Ebrington's farm was sheared early as an experiment ; they immediately ate from two to three pounds of turnips each per ' day more than before, showing their want of a warmer tempera- ture. These facts ought to make such an impression on our farmers as to lead them to keep all their stock warm through the winter, not turning them out except to water, and then but for a short time. In supplying our animals with suitable food, and in the preparation of it, there is undoubtedly a great waste, though t SECRETARY'S REPORT. 95 perhaps there would be a great diversity of opinion as to the extent of it and the means of prevention. No one can doubt that animals will thrive better, make more flesh, milk or wool, on rich food than on poor ; or with an occasional feed of roots or meal, and then dry fodder given them in such a way as to have it all consumed, than to be kept on one article the whole time. Therefore the farmer who feeds nothing but long, dry corn- stalks and coarse hay piled into his mangers in such quantities that every morning he has to throw out orts enough to litter his whole stock thoroughly, is suffering or committing a waste, either in his mode of feeding, or in the quality and the harvesting his cornstalks and hay. We believe there is no question as to the expediency of cutting stalks, both on account of having them better eaten and for convenience in getting out the manure. However favorably we may think of the further preparation of food for cattle by cutting, wetting, steaming,