I \ / ¥(n-fesl)ivc ^i)ilosop!jical ', m{ ■ , .; . i-^.- ■ :, .4; :.V .. ■ vy 'P' ^^ 4^ • ,_ -i."' ■!•'., ‘:i^,i*.‘ ’' ■ . .'f ^.'/i' \ ; H ■■■ >.f\ vV ‘'-‘i ’ ■ • '"I®*. ■ 4"-.. ■ " -■ ■ ■ •- ‘ V, :• v'hvi.. ' : ; ■> 1 - ^ ■' ''^v> ► <■•- tSI?. • '•'• VrI ■ •‘•’'1' ■ ^V^• r..i4f7.?!W»-U^V^? . ^ •' ^T' ^'' ' • • ^'iT, ' '^4' ■ ■■ ' '■''■■■ i '•^‘'i'''' ■ f' li, 'f f . ' '•■ '.v'. .' ^ ^ -■ V « '•■•'; ) i • » ^ - ■ :•<;>> > , t^vv ‘ 44i.K'‘- *K, : rt-V. ./. (U ' , ''f- 1, / r'^r. ■'., • ^ y*. ■ ' ■ . ' '’'^• ^ • ■'r'.>, -'i 'i' ', < > '. .■ ' . :'if, •■ '"' I ' • ■’:' •!*;.■' ■' . :; 'i^■' '■• :' .'■ K' ^tL •‘■fx' -.\ ..''■ ‘.i ■ -ii i V '. ':yrf ;,v, '■ ’-'i '5?: > IV >'M ' '>. »’ I ^ i V'V, A . ■■M- ■ . . ' ■' i L 1./ V V - ' ' ■-•A ■ >; fi '•=i. '» . < , ' . ' .■-. . r. • 'y. S > ■ ' • * ., r '■•' c i /./'-. •■' A v .^ 4 '■<>• <* . ■. ' v 'V''-4 ‘4/, i' ' »i'a f '.*1' “ 1 •■’.* :, 4;, r,-? • ' . ’4’ ■:4i: ,4.^' ■- '• ' 4 . ►■ U' ' •, X 39 and still retains traces of the white paint with which it seems to have been covered. It is possible also that on certain special occasions it was carried about in procession, shoulder high, as may he seen in some of the sculptures from Nineveh. It has been designedly injured ; the head is gone, and the inscription is mutilated. This is probably another example of early Christian intolerance. The reading of the inscription has taxed the ingenuity of many. I shall now give you, with some remarks of my own, a short abstract of a learned paper on the subject by Professor Hiibner, of Berlin, which he has published in the Transactions of the Archseologists of Bonn. Dr. Hiibner, before explaining his own views, takes the Aristotelian method of shewing how each of the previous interpretations is inaccurate. The letter D, as he observes, in the left corner, might pre-suppose the existence of M on the opposite side, which is now broken away. If the M was intended for Manihus, we have a fimereal inscription ; but, independently of anything else, the winged figure of the deity forbids such a supposition. Another suggested reading has been Deo Magno Volusius Irenceus Arimanio Now Arimanius was an Eastern deity, representing the minister of evil, in opposition to Mithras. This reading, however, cannot be assented to, as the last letter in the word Arimanius upon the stone is not 0, but a portion of H or Y. Then, again, it has been conjectured that on the right hand corner there might have been the letter M as an abridgment for Mithrce, the Sun-god, the beneficent source of life and heat. This is possible, but at present there is no recorded instance of M by itself, standing for Mithras. He is generally addressed as Deo Soli invicto ; oi: D S I M, that is, Deo Soli invicto Mithrw, or Mithrce C(auto) D(ati)^ and it would not be easy for the sculptor to find room for all these letters in the right-hand corner ; nor does the figure in any way resemble the representa¬ tions of Mithras. Another reading is Deo 3Iagno Volcano Irenceus et Arimanius posuerunt. Against this there is the fact that Yulcan never appears under the form of Vol. Besides, he is never represented with wings, and the hammer and tongs are more congenial to him than the staff and keys. F 40 We now come to Professor Hutner’s own suggestion. Leaving for a moment the name of the deity, he reads the words within the label or inclosed space-, as follows : — volvsii iRENJEvs ET ARiMAxivs POSVERVNT, that is, he makes the dedi¬ cators two brothers, called respectively Volusms Iremeus and Voluskis Arimankis. The name Arimanius is peculiar; it is possible that the Volusii were of Persian descent, and familiar therefore with the Eastern deity Arimahn. We now turn to the headless mysterious divinity. Dr. Hiihner considers that we have in it a representation of Time — ^on or ^vuni — and he compares it with a number of similar figures, discovered abroad, which are thought to set forth the same deity. The characteristics of these figures are a naked form with a lion’s head, and q. serpent coiling round the body. Sometimes it has two wings on the shoulders, sometimes two more on the legs. It holds a staff in one hand, often resem¬ bling a measuring rod ; in the other hand there is a bunch of keys. All these points are symbolical of Eastern worship, and some of them have been introduced into Christianity. The snake represents the mingling ages or eternity ; the rod, the power to take the measui’e of time ; the keys, the opening and closing of all things, particularly of the year ; the lion’s head signifies the strength and the devoTuing power of time. To turn to the sculpture itself, which is standing beside you. Dr. Hiihner considers that it had a lion’s head, and that the belt around the waist is an unsuccessful eflPort of a provincial sculptor to represent a serpent. In the right hand, or near it, is a portion of the measuring rod, in the left are the keys. The figure has two wings, and Dr. Hiihner supposes that in the right hand corner, at the end of the label, was the word JEvo or something like it. At the head of his paper, by the side of our figure from York, he gives a lithograph of a stone in the museum at Bonn, which does little more than express the very part which the York sculptiue wants, I mean the lion’s head. A more hideous looking creature it is difficult to imagine. In the course of the present siiimner a fragment of a tablet of limestone was discovered on the Mount, but most 41 unfortunately, only six letters of the inscription have been preserved. They constitute the ends of the two last lines C V R O.S.P. Of course any reading of this fragment can only be of the most conjectural character. The last two letters probably stand for sua iiecunia. It is much to he hoped that some farther portions of this inscription may he discovered. There have been recently placed in the Musemn two silver rings, each of which hears an inscription. The first was found some two years ago upon Barker Hill, and when it was cleaned with acid the two words DEO SHCELO disclosed themselves. The god Sucelus is entirely unknown. Probably he was some local divinity. There was a place of a similar name in Spain, and it is easy of com^se to form a theory that some soldier of the 9th, or the Spanish legion, brought this ring with him to York. The other ring bears the letters TOT, which are still more difficult to explain. It was found on the new railway works. Dr. Hiibner suggests the possibility of Mars Toutates having been intended. But this is entirely conjectural, and so also is the idea that TOT represents toUis, to be rendered perhaps icJwlIy thine, so that we may regard the ring as a lover’s gift. We have a discovery of a very different character in a stone coffin which was found in the new Pailway Station in the month of June. It bears no inscription, but it is the longest and the heaviest that we possess, being eight feet in length and proportionately thick. The coffin contained the bones of a woman laid in gypsum, in close adherence to which were portions of the dress in which she had been interred. The best of these fragments have been carefully preserved (they were shown upon the table) , and the coffin is now placed in the row of Poman tombs in the Hospitium, the bones and the gypsum having been carefully replaced in their original posi¬ tions. The top of the coffin is secured by a glass frame. And now let me mention a curious circumstance. The holes in the stone by which the frame is fastened to the coffin, were drilled by a left-handed man, and he remarked that the tool marks 42 on the outside of the coffin showed that the Roman mason who made them with his chisel had been left-handed like himself. The stone is so fine, and the chisel marks upon it are so fresh, that the coffin might have left the mason’s yard last week, instead of sixteen hundred years ago. YQ‘^-C r 1.^ MAR 188 t t »■ e ’V 'I c ■^p ’i I i;-' ,* ' \ r’ t - t j 11 ~j J # / ir t r I I > ' ■T^ '• '. r « ^■ f; ♦ . c. >‘ ■. - --\j" V (■», 0 _/ ' ^ — - % - ■• i I ... •Sr V : .-' ■ V ' i*' I it *^V * r h-'i '.- ii!-.! -.‘■'^.>s7*.'>>- , V4:, 1 Ml f, , 1^; ■*. } \ 'V,*; ■s -.V fi.it. 1 •Wii \Vv? V,-, A 1 V.