. dedicated to the appreciation and conservation Of the Colorado native flora” Volume 22 Numbers November— December 1998 Strategic Planning Eric Lane, CoNPS Board of Directors . For much of the past year, the officers and Board of Directors of the Colorado Native Plant Society have struggled to identify how best to gather, direct, and expend the Society’s resources in order to carry out its mission. Our Society has a broad mission, \t one that is unique unto itself. For the ^dke of our members and the flor^ we cher- ish, the leadership of the Society has embarked upon a path to develop and implement a strategic plan that will enable the Society to pursue its mission in the most efficient and effective way possible. Our , Society has a broad mission, but one that is unique unto itself. Six months ago, the Society hired Conservation Impact, a small Colorado con- sulting group that specializes in assisting environmental organizations, to meet with a randomly selected group of individuals from each chapter in order to identify what was on the minds of our Society’s members. Will Murray and Shell! Bischoff also con- ducted interviews with other Colorado orga- nizations and agencies to identify where our talents and collective voice could best be applied. The information gathered through this process has helped to form the founda- tion of the Society’s strategic plan that will uide our actions^nd efforts during the next ^^Wfve years. As outlined in our draft s^frategic plan, the four primary goals we have devel- oped thus far are: Double membership by the 2001 annual meeting. It is clear to the membership that there are many Coloradoans that care for, or are interested to learn more about Colorado's spectacular native flora. It behooves us to expand the membership to attract and include these individuals not only to help them gain a more sophisticated appreciation for this flora, but also to help conserve it. While the Society's member- ship has grown in recent years, it has not kept pace with the overall rate of Colorado's population growth. Through more active efforts and "advertising," the Society will work to bring interested Coloradoan's into the Society over the next three years. Maintain and enhance the quality and quantity of core membership services. The Society would not exist without its membership and the services it provides, both tangible and intangible. To better serve you, the Board and elected officers will work to improve the reliability, quality, and quantity of membership services including Aquilegia, field trips, workshops. Annual Meeting, and volunteef conservation activi- ties. A significant portion of our member- ship enjoys these services and we hope to improve upon them. Positively influence the protection and management of at least ten sites that har- bor rare species or exemplary natural communities by January 1, 2001. Conservation is one portion of the Society’s mission for which there exists great poten- tial. In the next few years, the Society aims to provide its members, especially the chap- ters, with unique partiiership opportunities to help protect and manage Colorado's spe- cial flora. Such opportunities may take the form of floiistic surveys, weed-pulls, or any number of active efforts on behalf of our state's native plants and plant communities. Our potential partners are innumerable; they include local offices of state and federal land management agencies, as well as local “Planning" continues on page 2 About the Society . . , Contents . . . . . . .2 Announcements . . . 8, 11 Articles . . . . .1-2, 3, 6-8, 11 Calendar .12 Chapter News .............. .5 For Your Library . . . . . . . . .9-10 Workshops . . . .4 Page 2 “Planning" continued from page 1 chapters of other like-minded education arid conservation organizations. Undertake at least four educational opportunities that reach 500 non-mem- bers each year. There are many Coloradoans who do not recognize the importance or value of Colorado’s native flora. Through the development of educa- tional materials and presentations, we hope to educate specific audiences about Colorado's flora so that they can make bet- ter decisions about the actions that may pos- itively or negatively affect our state's plants. Audiences may include environmental organizations, gardeners and their suppliers, Aquilegia K- 12 students, biology and other science teachers, and land management agencies. We hope that this plan will help to assure that the Society's limited resources are max- imized to achieve our goals, and address the needs and desires of our members. While this draft plan has not been formally adopt- ed, time to comment on it is short. As emphasized at our Annual Meeting, the Society needs your input to make this plan the best that it can be. Please contact your local Chapter President, Society Officers, or any of the Directors. We will also need your help to reach the goals set in our ambitibus new plan. Future issues of Aquilegia will let you know how you can help. We hope that Vol. 22 No. 6 many of the ideas and thoughts expressed in this draft plan ring true in the minds an^ hearts of our members. Let us know wb'^.* you think. Hope to hear from you soon! A note of appreciation and thanks from the Board and Officers of the Society to Alice Guthrie, Bob Clarke;,^^ Carolyn Crawford, Sandy Friedley, Jill Handwerk, Denise Larson, and Gretchen Van Reyper. Each did a fantastic job organizing focus groups around the State. Also, a Special thank you to all the members who volunteered their time to participate in the focus groups for the Society's strategic planning efforts. Your efforts have helped to lay the foundation for the Society's work for years to come! Colorado Native Plant Society The Colorado Native Plant Society is a npn- profit organization dedicated to the apprecia-.. tion and conservation of the Colorado native flora. Membership is open to all with an inter- est in our native plants, and is composed of plant enthusiasts both professional and non- professional. Please join us in helping to encourage interest in enjoying and protecting Colorado's native plants. The Society sponsors field trips, work- shops, and other activities through local chap- ters and statewide. Contact the Society, a chap- ter representative, or committee thair for more information. Schedule of Membership Fees Life .^ $250 Supporting , .$50 Organization .$30 Family or Dual $15 Individual .$12 Student or Senior . .$8 Membership Renewal/Information Please direct all membership applications, renewals, and address changes to the Membership Chairperson, Colorado Native Plant Society, P.O. Box 200, Fort Collins, CO 80522. Please direct all other inquiries regarding the Society to the Secretary at the same address. Aquilegia is published four to six times per year by the Colorado Native Plant Society. This newsletter is available to members of the Society and to others with an interest in native plants. Contact the Society for subscription information. Articles for Aquilegia may be used by other native plant societies or non- profit groups if fully cited to author and attrib- uted to Aquilegia. Please direct all contributions to the newsletter to: Leo P. Bruederle Biology, Campus Box 171 University of Colorado at Denver P.O. Box 173364 Denver, CO 80217-3364 E-Mail: Ibrueder @ carbon.cudenver.edu Short items such as unusual information about a plant, a little known botanical term, etc., are especially welcome. Previously published arti- cles submitted for reprinting require permis- sion. Camera-ready line art or other illustra- tions are also solicited. Please include author's name and address, although anonymity may be requested. Articles submitted via e-mail or on disks (MAC prefer- ably, or IBM) are appreciated. Please indicate word processing software and version. Officers President Jeff Dawson. , . . 303-722-6758 Vice-President . . . Jill Handwerk . . 970-221-3460 Secretary Alice Guthrie. . . 303-651-3127 Treasurer Denise Culver . . 970-225-1930 Board of Directors Bill Jennings (99) .... Louisville . . 303-666-8348 Andy Kratz (99) Lakewood. . 303-914-8291 Eric Lane (99). Lakewood. . 303-239-4182 Paula Lehr (99) Gunnison . . 970-641-0671 Don Parker (99) ..... Golden . . . . 3Q3-279-4549 Gay Austin (00) Gunnison . . 970-641-6264 Leo Bruederle (00) . . . Denver .... 303-556-3419 Jeff Dawson (00) Denver .... 303-722-6758 Christine Leahy (00) . . Golden .... 303-425-1227 Peggy Lyon (00) . . . . Ridgway . . . 970-626-319' Susan Spackman (00) . Loveland . . 970-667-286>^/^ Chapter Presidents Boulder Carolyn Crawford 303-666-8348 Metro-Denver . . Denise Larson . . . 303-733-4338 Fort Collins .... Don Hazlett . . . . . 970-834-1493 Yamparika . . Plateau Southwest .. . Reed Kelley 970-878-4666 . . Gretchen . . Van Reyper 970-835-3268 . .-Sandy Friedley. . .970-884-9245 Committees Communications . . Leo P. Bruederle303-556- and . . Jeff Dawson . . 303-722- Conservation Bob Clarke. . . . 970-242- EduCation Rob Reinsvold . 970-351- and . . Joyce Gellhom 303-442- Field Trips . Rick Brune. . . . 303-238- Field Studies ' . . . . Loraine Yeatts . 303-279- Hort/Restoration . . Lisa Tasker. . . . 303-447- Legislative Affairs . VACANT Membership. . . . . . Myma Steinkamp and . . Sue Martin . . . 970-226 Publications Rick Brune. . . . 303-238 and.. Velma Richards 303-794 Publicity , . . . VACANT Rare Plant ; Eleanor Monograph . Von Barren . . . 303-756 Workshops. .... . . Bill Jennings . . 303-666 3419 6758 6067 2716 -8123 -5078 -3427 ■9431 3371 5078 5432 140 ^' 834 ^^ Aquilegia Vol. 22 No. 6 Page 3 1998 CoNPS Annual Meeting: Sagebrush Ecosystems Alice Guthrie, CoNPS Secretary The 1998 Annual Meeting was held austin_gay/r2_gmug@fs.fed.us. Clematis alpina Artist: Nicola Ripley September 19-20, at the Aspinall- Wilson Center on the campus of Western State College in Gunnison. What a great facility for a meeting like ours! We had plenty of room for coffee and bagels, book sales, educational displays, and t-shirt sales (one of the most popular tables), as well as a meeting room well-suited for the speakers. There were over 120 members and/or guests at this meeting — clearly a success! Gay Austin and Paula Lehr did an excellent job planning and organizing the meeting. The Board would like to recognize all of their hard work over the past year. Tony Hoag (along with his son Jasper) was the moderator for the sessions on Saturday. Thank you, Tony, for keeping us on track. Sheila Thompson organized a Plant Identification Contest aiong a trail just up the hill from the Center. It provided an incentive to get outside, enjoy the sunshine, and try our hand at identifying the local flora. The winner of the Professional Division was Steven Wenger; Jeanne Wenger won the Amateur Division. Plant prizes were donated by Gary Ludwig (Pleasant Avenue Nursery). Congratulations to newly elected or re-elected Board Members Leo Bruederle, Jeff Dawson, Christine Leahy, Susan Spackman, and co-directors Gay Austin and Peggy Lyon, the first time a directorship has been shared. Their two-year term will end in 2000. Dr. Janet Wingate of the Denver Botanic Garden was pre- sented with a Lifetime Membership Award. She received a cer- tificate with original artwork by C^olyn Crawford and a horse blanket, proving that she doesn’J spend all of her time looking at plants! CoNPS has certainly benefited from her leadership, expertise, and hard work over the years. An update on the Strategic Planning process was given by Eric Lane (Director, 1999). He explained the process that was followed by the Board and summarized progress to date. Much work remains in order to finalize a realistic work plan and accomplish bur goals. A handout was made available that listed goals and objectives developed at the August planning session. Contact any Board member or your Chapter President for a copy. The Board will continue to have articles in Aquilegia as we complete our plans. The Keynote Address was given by Dr. E. Durant McArthur, from the Shrub Sciences Laboratory, USES, Provo, Utah. He has worked extensively on Artemisia, focusing his talk on sub- genus Tridentata. He presented considerable information on the genetics of Artemisia, as well as the habitats of several sub- species. He also discussed hybridization and the Hybrid Zone Theory Hypothesis, which states that hybrids between species are narrowly adapted, but successful in dynamic habitats or zones. It appears that this is a mechanism allowing Artemisia to adapt to changing climatic conditions over time. Copies of Dr. McArthur’s slides and tables are available from Gay Austin at 970-641-0471 (W), 970-641-6264 (H), or e-mail at Kathy Warren next presented some lovely slides of common and uncommon wildflowers of tfie sagebrush, and shared details about the medicinal uses of some of them; Sandy Hayes, an ecologist with the BLM, presented information about the Gunnison sagegrouse, including habitat requirements, current and historical ranges, population densities, and current threats to the birds and their habitat. The Gunnison sagegrouse is recog- nized as a subspecies distinct from the sagegrouse that is com- mon in North and Middle Parks. It is dependent on big sage- brush, with the amount of exposed vegetation over the winter particularly important for its survival. Dr. Roger Rosentreter spoke about the role of microbiotic soil crusts in sagebrush ecosystems. He .provided background infor- mation for those who did not attend the workshop preceding the meeting. He explained that microbiotic crusts are composed of cyanobacteria, mosses and lichens. He discussed their func- tions, the different morphological types (structure), and the ben- efits they provide, such as retaining moisture, capturing wind- blown soil, and increasing biodiversity. Rare and endangered species of the sagebrush community were discussed by Susan Spackman, Colorado Natural Heritage Program botanist. She emphasized eight plant species: three species of Astragalus, three Penstemon species, Cirsium per- plexum, and Lesquerella viscina\ but also noted that there are threats to the sage sparrow, as well as some bat and insect species. Creating and restoring landscapes with native species were discussed by Gretchen Van Reyper and Dr. David Buckner.. Gretchen gave an informative talk about landscaping with native plants and provided good sources of seed and plant mate- rial. David discussed the problems associated with re-establish- ing sagebrush and how to overcome them, including some prac- tical applications. Seedling sagebrush does not compete well with grasses, as sagebrush seedlings are less vigorous than grass seedlings. In a discussion of the paleoecology of the Basin going back approximately 10,000 years, the final speaker of the day. Dr. Steve Emslie provided an excellent overview of the cli- matic conditions of Gunnison Basin. Much of his data have come from caves and packrat middens. Although a few young pinyon trees have been found, evidence exists that indicates pinyon-juniper has been absent for about 3,000 years ago. All attendees had a chance to learn more about sagebrush ecosystems — starting with Friday’s field trip on microbiotic crusts; continuing with the lectures on Saturday; and ending on Sunday with the sagebrush identification workshop and visits to a sagegrouse lek, as well as histodc and archaic settlement sites. The Annual Meeting was filled with diverse activities and inter- esting topics, all related to sagebrush communities. Thanks again to the Plateau Chapter for hosting such an educational and inspiring meeting! Page 4 Aquilegia Vol. 22 No. 6 1 998-1 999 CoNPS WORKSHOPS THE POACEAE: HOW TO KNOW THE TRIBES IN THE GRASS FAMILY Leader: Dr. David Buckner Location: Foothills Nature Center, Boulder First session: Saturday, December 5, 1998 Second session: Sunday, December 6, 1998 someday be relocated within Colorado. Susan and her associate^^ at the Colorado Natural Heritage Program will make available for us an abstract of each of these species, along with herbarium spec- imens of the species, if available. Information on many of these species is presented in the Colorado Rare Plant Field Guide, pub- lished by the Heritage Program or is presented in Rare Plants of Colorado, published by the Native Plant Society. In this workshop, Dave will discuss the structure of various nat- ural groups within the grass family and how they can be identi- fied. The grass family is so large that, without some understand- ing of the tribes within the family, identification of an individual grass becomes a formidable challenge. Keys to the tribes and gen- era wilf be available as handouts. Specimens of many grasses will be available for study. Every Colorado botanist should have a working knowledge of the grass family. Come and refine your grass identification skills. CHENOPODIACEAE: THE GOOSEFOOT FAMILY Leader: Dr. Hugh Wilson Location: University of Colorado, Boulder First session: Saturday, January 16, 1999 Second session: Sunday, January 17, 1999 The Colorado Native Plant Society's first out-of-state workshop leader is Dr. Hugh Wilson of Texas A&M University. Dr. Wilson co-wrote the treatment of genus Chenopodium for the Flora of the Great Plains. In this workshop, we will cover most of the genera that occur in Colorado east of the Continental Divide, focusing particularly on the species that occur on the plains. There are a large number of representatives of the Chenopodiaceae in Colorado, but they are not often collected because they are "weedy" and do not usually produce attractive flowers. Closely related species are sometimes separated on technical characters, making identification difficult. Nevertheless, this is a very impor- tant family in the Colorado flora. In addition to the workshop, Dr. Wilson will present a program for the CoNPS Boulder Chapter on Thursday, January 14, at Foothills Nature Center. COLORADO'S Missing flora \ Leader: Susan Spackman Location: Foothills Nature Center, Boulder First session: Saturday, February 13, 1999 Second session: Sunday, February 14, 1999 The title of this workshop refers to those species that are thought to be extinct, thought to be extirpated (but still extant outside Colorado), or collected once or twice and never seen again with- in the State. This workshop will focus on making these species better known to the botanical public in hope that these plants may POLEMONIACEAE OF COLORADO Leader: Dr. J. Mark Porter Location: University of Colorado, Boulder First session: Saturday March 6, 1999 Second session: Sunday March 7, 1999 , Our second out-of-state workshop workshop leader is Dr. J. Mark Porter of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens located in Claremont, California. He has been actively involved in the devel- opment of the new San Juan Basin Flora, as well as study of the Polemoniaceae of the Four Corners area. Participants on the May 16, 1998, field trip to the Four Corners area may remember M^k as one of the co-leaders. He has some exciting new ideas about the Polemoniaceae and will bring us up to date on the recent research into this complex and confusing family. When is a Gilia not a Giliai When it's an Alicella, a new genus proposed by Dr. Porte" BOTANICAL ILLUSTRATION: FIELD SKETCHING Leader: Carolyn Crawford Location: Foothills Nature Center, Boulder First session: Saturday, April 17, 1999 Second session: Sunday, April 18, 1999 This is a much requested workshop topic. Well-known botanical artist Carolyn Crawford will present the techniques she uses for on-the-spot illustration of plants arid plant parts. Topica to be cov- ered include the use of colored pencils, a good dry medium for use in the field. Pen-and-ink and traditional watercolors do not work well in the sun and wind. There will be ample plant and flowef material available for participants to work with. There is no bet way to really see and know a flower than to draw its parts. Ev^ if you never intend to illustrate commercially, drawing for enjoy- ment or for your own records is a good aid in flower identification. Voi. 22 No. 6 Aquilegia Page 5 CHAPTER NEWS ''W'" ■■ — Boulder Chapter Monthly meetings are held through May on the second Thursday of each month at the Foothills Nature Center located in Boulder on North Broadway opposite its intersection with Sumac. For more infor- mation, contact Carolyn Crawford or Bill Jennings at (303) 665-6903 or (303) 666-8348. November 12, 7:30 PM Rocky Mountain Floristic Inventories Dr. Ron Hartman (Rocky Mountain Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Wyoming) will deliver a talk and slide show focusing on systematic floristic inventories carried out by the Rocky Mountain Herbarium with particu- lar emphasis on the Flora of the Rocky Mountains project. NOTE: This meeting will be held at Iris Center, 3198 North Broadway in Boulder, located about 11 blocks south of Foothills Nature Center, Pedicularis groenlandica Artist: Kris Miering December 10, 7:30 PM Sand Sage Prairies Chris Pague (Land Steward, CO Nature Conservancy) will show in this slide pre- sentation why the sand sage prairie is a sig- nificant and important part of Colorado’s prairie landscape. See the results of recent studies to identify these areas, and become familiar with this community, its distribu- tion, and conservation status. January 14, 7:30 PM Goosefoots of the Plains Dr. Hugh Wilson (Department of Biology, Texas A&M University) will present a pro- gram on the goosefoots (Chenopodiaceae) of the Plains. He is co-author of the Chenopodium treatment in Flora of the Great Plains, and will be later presenting a workshop on the same topic. Come see this presentation on this large and difficult fam- ily as a preview to the workshop. Fort Collins Chapter Monthly meetings convening in the con- ference room at the USDA National Seed Storage Laboratory have been scheduled for November 3 and December 1 . For addi- tional information call Don Hazlett at (970) 834-1493. November 3, 7:00 pm Corylus (hazelnut) Taxonomy and Distribution Ixchell Whitcher (Department of Biology, Colorado State University) will be dis- cussing the taxonomy and distribution of the genus Corylus. December 1, 7:00 pm Araliaceae Taxonomy, Distribution, and Disjunct Taxa Dr. Jun Wen (CSU Herbarium, Department of Biology, Colorado State University) will be discussing her research on disjunct distributions of taxa in the Araliaceae, as well as other plant families. Plateau Chapter Please contact Gretchen Van Reyper at (970) 835-3268 for Plateau Chapter activities. Metro-Denver Chapter I Monthly meetings are held in the Morrison Center at the Denver Botanic Garden. For additional information, contact Denise Larson at (303) 733-4338. December 8, 7:30 pm South Table Mesa Loraine Yeatts will be delivering a pre- sentation on this fascinating landform. Southwest Chapter Please contact Sandy Friedley at (970) 884-9245 for Southwest Chapter news and activities. Yamparika Chapter Please contact Reed Kelley at (970) 878- 4666 for Yamparika Cha|>ter news and activities. Page 6 Aquilegia Vol. 22 No. 6 Long-term harmful effects of crested wheatgrass on Great Plains grassland ecosystems Peter Lesica and Thomas H. DeLuca ^ Invasions by exotic plants are occurring at an increasing rate and are considered a serious threat to both agricultural systems as well as native communities (Drake et al. 1989). Many of the most harmful exotics in North America were introduced inten- tionally (Ruesink et al. 1995, Williams 1 980). Exotic plants such as tamarisk {Tamarix spp.), Russian olive {Elaeagnus angiistifolia), purple loosestrife {Lythrum salicaria), African lovegrasses {Eragrostis lehmanniana, E. curvula) and smooth bromegrass {Bromus inermis) were origi- nally brought to North America for agri- cultural or horticultural purposes but have displaced native species and threaten bio- logical diversity of native communities (Malecki et al. 1993; Robinson 1965; Romo and Grilz 1990; Bock et al. 1986; Shafroth et al. 1995). Many Eurasian grasses have been inten- tionally introduced throughout temperate North America, primarily for hay and pas- ture. The most commonly planted exotic grass in western North America is crested wheatgrass {Agropyron cristatum, A. desertorum). There are between 15 and 26 million acres of crested wheatgrass on this continent (Holchek 1981; Rogler and Lorenz 1983). The conversion of native prairie to crested wheatgrass primarily occurred after the drought of the late 1920s and 1930s when large areas of marginal cropland were abandoned and then seeded with non-native grasses to reduce soil ero- sion potential (Lorenz 1986). Today, crest- ed wheatgrass continpes to be planted over large areas of the Northern Great Plains, Since 1985 several million acres of crested wheatgrass have been planted on idled cropland as part of the Conservation Reserve Program. There are many reasons for the popularity of crested wheatgrass. It is tolerant of cold and drought and suited to most soils (Knowles and Buglass 1980). Crested wheatgrass establishes easily from seed, responds well to fertilizer (Box 1986) and has high nutritive value (Box 1986). It gen- erally yields better than native grasses of the Great Plains (Dormaar et al. 1978: 1995; Smoliak and Dormaar 1985; McWilliams and VanCleave 1960), and usually provides greater livestock weight gains (Smoliak 1968; Hofmann et al. 1993). Seeded stands of crested wheat- grass resist invasion by weeds (Knowles and Buglass 1980). The advantages of crested wheatgrass are obvipus, and it is not uncommon for livestock managers to break native prairie in order to plant it. Although crested wheatgrass is generally considered a beneficial introduction, there are several, often overlooked factors that do not have immediate economic impact but may create a significant long-term decline in biological diversity and soil resource sustainability. Few people who have walked through crested wheatgrass stands can deny that they have far lower plant species diversity compared to native mid-grass prairie {Dormaar et al. 1978). Crested wheatgrass is a strong competitor (Box 1986). It takes up phosphorus, espe- cially from areas of enrichment, faster than native species (Black et al. 1994; Caldwell et al. 1985), and its seedlings are better than native species at sequestering mois- ture at low temperatures (Harris and Wilson 1970). As a result, few native plants are able to invade crested wheat- grass plantings (Looman and Heinrichs 1973; McHenry and Newell 1947; Wilson 1989) resulting in a virtual monoculture for at least 40-50 years (Anderson and Marlette 1986; Box 1986; Smoliak et al. 1967). The paucity of plant diversity in crested wheatgrass pastures undoubtedly results in lower diversity of invertebrate and vertebrate animals as well, although data documenting this effect on the Great Plains appear to be nonexistent. Monocultures of crested wheatgrass have promoted population explosions of insect herbivores that generally remain at lower levels in multi-species communities (Lattin et al. 1994). These outbreaks have resulted in losses of graminoid productivi- ty and the use of expensive pesticides. Several studies suggest that there may be a long-term negative impact of crested wheatgrass stands on soil. The strong com- petitive ability of crested wheatgrass cre- ates a ground layer with more exposed soil than in native mid-grass prairie (Wilson 1989), as much as ten times more in some cases (Dormaar et al. 1995). Grasslands with more exposed soil experience higher rates of erosion (Dormaar et al. 1995; McWilliams and VanCleave 1960). Less evident and perhaps more serious than increased wind and water erosion is the possibility that stands of crested wheat- grass cannot maintain biochemical soil quality as effectively as native grasslands (Dormaar et al. 1995). High soil quality is defined by sustainability of microbial activity and diversity, efficient cycling of nutrients, and proliferation and function of roots of desirable plant species. It usually is measured by variables such as aggregate stability, bulk density, pH, soil organic matter, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity (Gregorich et al. 1994). Although crested wheatgrass has much higher above-ground productivity compared to midgrass prairie dominated by blue gram;^^^ {Bouteloua gracilis), needle-and-thread^^ {Stipa comata), and wbstern wheatgrass (Agrdpyroh smithii), below-ground bio- mass in the surface horizons is significant- ly lower (Dormaanet al. 1995; Reden te et al. 1989; Smoliak and "Dormaar 1985; Smoliak et al. 1967). This lower below- ground biomass in crested wheatgrass reflects a reduction in both root detritus and root exudates that would otherwise be available for microbial use in the forma- tion of soil organic matter. Below-ground biomass upder stands of crested wheatgrass has a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio than native grass species and only supplies about half as much organic N to soil (Biondini et al. 1988; Klein et al. 1987; 1988; Redente et al. 1989). The smaller quantity and lower quality of organic matter in the upper soil horizons under stands of crested wheatgrass result in a lower energy input to these soils com- pared to native range (Dormaar et al. 1978) anc^ alter physical and biochemical processes in soil. Stands of crested wheat^^. grass are associated with higher bulk den- sity, fewer water stable, aggregates, and “Wheatgrass ” continues on page 7 Vol. 22 No. 6 Aquilegia Page 7 lower levels of organic matter and nitrogen compared to native grasses (Biondini et al. 1988; Dormaar et al. 1978; 1995; \^v^McHenry and Newell 1947; Redente et al, 1989; Smoliak et al. 1967). Crested wheat- grass provides the soil with a relatively high concentration of carbohydrates and little organic nitrogen (Klein et al. 1988). This combination likely results in increased mineralization of soil organic nitrogen (i,e., the so-called “priming effect”) as quantities of readily degraded carbohydrates in the presence of limited nitrogen often result in a net demand on soil organic nitrogen (DeLuca and Keeney 1993; Jansson and Persson 1982; Mortensen 1 963). It has been suggested that these alter- ations to soil quality may prevent native species from invading the crested wheat- grass monocultures (Klein et al. 1988). Crested wheatgrass appears to influence soil quality in a manner similar to that of row crop systems. Crop species generally have limited root mass, provide soil with limited quantities of organic nitrogen, pro- vide organic matter primarily in the fono of carbohydrates (cellulosic crop residues), and result in a significant decline in soil K^^^rganic matter quality (DeCuca and Keeney 1994). In the casp of croppii^g sys- tems much of the organic nitrogen is removed in the form of harvested grain. For crested wheatgrass stands, some of the humic nitrogen is converted to animal pro- tein, but likely a great deal is lost to the atmosphere through volatilization of urine and senescing vegetation (Schimel et al. 1986). We presently lack the knowledge to deter- mine the long-term effects of crested wheatgrass on the Great Plains. However, there is a growing body of knowledge that suggests that crested wheatgrass alters the environment in tnany undesirable ways. Further research of the changes in soils and plant and animal diversity associated with crested wheatgrass are needed to assess its impact. Nonetheless, the continued con- version Of native prairie and planting of crested wheatgrass or other exotic species seems ill advised. REFERENCES CITED A.nderson, J.E., and G.M. Marlette. 1986. Probabilities of seedling recruitment and the stability of crested wheatgrass stands. In; K.L. Johnson (ed.), Crested wheat- grass: Its values, problems and myths. Symposium proceedings. Utah State University, Logan, pp. 97-105. Biondini, M., D.A. Klein, and E.F. Redente. 1988. Carbon and nitrogen losses through root exudation by Agropyron spicatum, A. smithii and Bouteloua gracilis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20: 477-482. Black, R.A., J.H. Richards, and J.H. Manwaring. 1994. Nutrient uptake from enriched soil microsites by three Great Basin perennials. Ecology 75: 1 10-122. Bock, C.E., J.H. Bock, K.L. Jepson, and J.C. Ortega. 1986. Ecological effects of planting African love grasses in Arizona. Nat. Geogr. Res. 2: 456-463. Box, T.W. 1986. Crested wheatgrass: Its values, problems and myths; where now? In: K.L. Johnson (ed.), Crested wheat- grass: Its values, problems and myths. Symposium proceedings. Utah State University, Logan, pp. 343-345. Caldwell, M.M. D.M. Eissenstat, J.H. Richards, and M.F. Allen. 1985. Competition for phosphorus: Differential uptake from dual-isotope-labeled soil interspaces between shrub and grass. Science 229-. 384-386. DeLuca, T.H., and D.R. Keeney. 1993. Glucose induced nitrate assimilation in prairie and cultivated soils. Biogeochem: 21:167-176. DeLuca, T.H., and D.R. Keeney. 1994. Soluble carbon and nitrogen pools of prairie and cultivated soils: Seasonal variation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 835- 840. Dormaar, J.F., A. Johnston, and S. Smoliak. 1978. Long-term soil changes associated with seeded stands of crested wheatgrass in southeastern Alberta, Canada. In D.N. Hyder (ed.). Proceedings /cf the first International Rangeland Congress. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO. pp. 623-625. Dormaar, J.F., M.A. Naeth, W.D. Willms, and D.S. Chanasyk. 1995. Effect of native prairie, crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.) and Russian wildrye (Elymus junceus Fisch.) on soil chemical properties. J. Range Mauage. 48: 258-263. Drake, J.A., H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson (eds.). 1989. Biological invasions: A global perspec- tive. Wiley, Chichester, England. Gregorich, G.G., M.R. Carter, D.A. Angers, C.M. Monreal, and B.H. Elbert. 1994. Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agri- cultural soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74: 367- 385. Harris, G.A., and A.M. Wilson. Cornpetition for moisture among seedlings of annual and perennial grasses as influenced by root elongation at low temperature. Ecology 51: 530-534. Hofmann, L., R.L. Ries, J.F. Karn, and A.B. Frank. 1993. Comparison of seeded and native pastures grazed from mid- May through September. J. Range Manage. 46: 251-254. Holchek, J.L. 1981. Crested wheatgrass. Rangelands 3: 237-250. Jansson, S.L., and J. Persson. 1982. Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. In: F.J. Stevenson (ed.), Nitrogen in agricultural soils. American Society of \Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. Vol. 22 pp. 229-252. Klein, D.A., B,A. Frederick, W.C. Metzger, E.F. Redente, and M.J. Trlica. 1987. Comparative soil microbial struc- tural-functional relationships of intro- duced crested wheatgrass and native prairie communities. Pages L-2-1 to L-2- 5. In; F.F. Munshower, S E. Fisher, and RE. Parady (eds.), Fourth biennial sym- posium on surface mining and reclama- tion on the Great Plains. Montana State University Research Unit Report 8704, _ Billings. Klein, D.A., B.A, Frederick, M. Biondini, and M.J. Trilica. 1988. Rhizosphere microorganism effects on soluble amino acids, sugars and organic acids in the root zone of Agropyron cristatum, A. smithii and Bouteloua gracilis. Plant 110: 19-25. Knowles, R.P., and E. Buglass. 1980. Crested wheatgrass. Agriculture Canada Publication 1295, Ottawa. Lattin, J.D., A. Christie, and M.D. Schv/artz. 1994. The impact of non- indigenous crested wheatgrass on native black grass bugs in North America: A case for ecosystem management. Natural Areas J. 14: l36-m. Looman, J., and D.H. Hendrichs. 1973. Stability of crested 3vheatgrass pastures under long-term pasture use. Can. J. . Plant Sci. 53: 501-506. Lorenz, R.J. 1986. Introduction and early “Wheatgrass ” continues on page 8 Aquilegia Page 8 Vol. 22 No. 6 use of crested wheatgrass in the Northern Great Plains. In: K.L. Johnson (ed.). Crested wheatgrass: Its values, problems and myths. Symposium proceedings. Utah State University, Logan, pp. 9-19. Malecki, R.A., B. Blossey, S.D. Hight, D. Schrohder, L.T. Kok, and J.R. Coulson, 1993. Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScie/rce 43: 680-686.^ McHenry, J.R., and L.C. Newell. 1947. Influence of some perennial grasses on the organic matter content and structure of an eastern Nebraska fine-textured soil. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 39: 981-994. McWilliams, J.L., and P.E. VanCleave, 1960. A comparison of crested wheat- grass and native grass mixtures seeded on rangeland in eastern Montana. J. Range Manage. 13: 9 U94. Mortensen, J. L. 1963. Decomposition of organic matter and rtiineralization of nitrogen in Brookston silt loam and alfal- fa green manure. Plant Soil 19: 374-384. Redente, E.F., M.E. Biondini, and J. C. ■ , I Moore. 1989. Observations on biomass dynamics of a crested wheatgrass and native shortgrass ecosystem in southern Wyoming. J. Range Manage. 42: 113- 118. Robinson, T.W. 1965. Introduction, spread, and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 491-A, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Rogler, G.A., and R.J. Lorenz. 1983. Crested wheatgrass-early history in the United States. J. Range Mange. 36: 91- Romo, J.T., and P.L. Grilz. 1990. Invasion of the Canadian prairies by an exotic perennial. R/we Vrzy 48: 130-135. Ruesink, J.L., I.M. Parker, M.J, Groom, and PM. Kareiva. 1995. Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introduc- tions. BioScience 45: 465-477. Schimel, D.S., W.J. Parton, F.J. Adamsen, R.G. Woodmansee, R.L. Senft, and M.A. Stillwell. 1986. The role of cattle in the volatile loss of nitrogen from a short- grass siQppe. Biogeochem. 2: 39-52. Shafroth, P.B., G.T. Auble, and M.L. Scott. 1995. Germination and establishment the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subsp. monilifera) and the exotic Russian-olive {Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) Conserv. Biol. 9: 1169- 1175. Smoliak, S., A. Johnston, and L.E. Lutwick. 1967. Productivity and durabil- ity of crested wheatgrass in southeastern Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. Al\ 539-548. Smoliak, S., and J.E. Dormaar. 1985. Productivity of Russian wildrye and crested wheatgrass and their effects on prairie soils. J. Range Manage. 38: 403- 405. Williams, M.C. 1980. Purposefully intro- duced plants that have become noxious or poisonous weeds. Weed Sci. 2^: 300- 30b. Wilson, S.D. 1989. The suppression of native prairie by alien species introduced for re vegetation. Landscape Urban Plann. 17: 113-119. NOTE: This article waS cominunicated by Bob Clark (Chair, Conservation , Committee, CoNPS). Reprinted from the"^^ September-October issue of the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation with the per- mission of the Assistant Editor. The John W. Marr Fund; An endowment for the support of small grants for research On March 24, 1990, the Board of Directors of the Colorado Native Plant Society established the John W. Marr Fund for the occasional award of small grants in support of research in plant biology. The Fund honors the late Dr. John Marr, Professor at the University of Colorado and the first President of the Colorado Native Plant Society. The Fund was established to encourage, through the provision of small grants-in-aid, research on the biology and natural history of Colorado native plants. Both field and laboratory studies are eli- gible for funding. Awards of $500 or less may represent the sole support of a project, may be part of joi nt funding agreed upon with other granting groups or organizations, or may be used to supple- ment other funding obtained by the investigator(s). Traditionally, awards from the John W. Marr Fund have been made at irregular intervals, subject to availability of suitable pro- posals for which funding assistance is sought. However, the Bqard is now soliciting proposals for a January 15, 1999 deadline. Information on guidelines and requirements for proposals may be obtained by contacting the Society. Awards are made solely at the discretion of the CoNPS Board of Directors. 4Q(y/LEG/A Deadline Approaches Please submit all contributions for Vol, 23 No. 1 of Aquilegid on or prior to December 7, 1998. Short items such as unusual infor- mation about a plant, a little known botanical term, etc., are espe- cially welcome. Please note that previously published articles sub- mitted for reprinting in Aquilegia require permission from the edi- tor of original publication. Camera-ready line art or other illustra- tions are also solicited. Please include author's name and address, although anonymit) y, may be requested. Articles submitted via e-mail or onfrisks (MAC preferably, or IBM) are very much appreciated. Please indicate word processing software and version. Vol. 22 No. 6 Aquilegia Page 9 FOR YOUR LIBRARY CoNPS is pleased to provide a selection of books to members at discount prices; a partial list follows. If you are interested in any of these or would like a complete list of available selections, please contact: Velma Richards, 3 125 Monmouth Ave., Englewood, CO 80110 or (303) 794-5432. Make check payable to CoNPS. Postage costs are additional for books received by mail. If you wanUo save postage charges, you can pick up the books yourself from Velma Richards in Denver, Pat Murphy in Boulder, or Denise Culver in Fort Collins. COLORADO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY — DISCOUNT FUBUCATIONS ORDM FORM Price Shipping Book Shipping/ Title Author Per Handling No. Cost Handling Book Per Book Total Total Alpine Flower Finder Wingate & Yeats 4.50 2.00 Alpine Wildflowers of the Northern Rocky Mts. Strickler 7.50 2.00 Alpine Wildflowers of the Rocky Mts. Duft & Moseley 11.00 2.00 Best Tasting Wild Plants of Colorado Seebeck 13.50 2.00 Canyon Country Wildflowers, Field Guide to Fagan 12.00 2.00 Catalog of the Colorado Flora: A Biodiversity Baseline Weber & Wittman 40.00 3.25 Changes in Vegetation and Land Use in Eastern CO USDA 20.00 2.75 Colorado Wildflowers Jones 5.50 2.00 Colorado’s 30 Troublesome Weeds CWMA 3.00 1.25 Colorado’s BestWildlife Hikes Irwin 15.00 2.75 Colorado’s Canyon Country Pearson & Fielder 15.00 2.00 Denver Grasses, A Key to the Common Genera^ Wingate 0.25 0.50 - Desert Wildflowers Taylor 1^50 2.75^ Dictionary of Word Roots Borrer 9.00 2.00 Edible and Medicinal Plants of the West Tilford 16.50 2.75 Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie Kindscher 10.50 2.00 Familiar Cacti North America Heil 6.50 2.00 , Field Guide to Colorado Wildflowers, Vol. 1, Plains Guenncl 18.75 2.75 Field Guide to Colorado Wildflowers, Vol. 2, Mountains Guennel 18.75 2.75 Flora of the Great Plains Great Plains Flora Assoc. 44.00 3.75 Flora of the Pacific Northwest Hitchcock & Cronquist 46.00 3.75 Flora of the San JUans Komarek 15.50 2.00 Floristic Survey: Black Forest Maley 3.00 2.00 Floristic Survey: Mesa de Maya Region Clark 4.00 2.00 ■ Gardener’s Guide to Plant Conservation, The Marshall 7.00 2.00 ■- Grass Varieties in the USA Lewis & Sharp 43.00 3.75 Handbook of Rocky Mountain Plants Nelson 16.00 2.75 How to ID Grasses & Grasslike Plants Harrington 11.20 ioo How to Identify Plants Harrington 8.00 2.00 Illustrated Keys to the Grasses of Colorado Wingate 7.50 2.00 Intermountain Flora 1 , 3-6 (ContactWelma Richards) Cronquist et al. - - Page 10 Aquilegia Vol. 22 No. 6 COLORADO NAIXVE RANT SOCIETY — DISCOUNT PUBUCATK»«S ORDER FORM Title Author Price Per Book Shipping Handling Per Book No, Book Cost Total Shipping/ Handling Total < King of Colorado Botany: C C. Parry Weber 32.00 2.00 Lichen Primer Corbridge & Weber 15.00 2.00 Medicinal Wild Plants of the Prairie Kindscher 10.50 2.75 Meet the Natives, ninth edition Pesman 10.50 2.00 Mushrooms of Colorado Evenson 18.75 2.75 - North American Range Plants Stubbendeick 20.00 2.75 Plant Identification Terminology Harris & Harris 14.50 2;75 Plant List: Dinosaur NatT Monument Naumann 1.25 1.00 - Plant Survival Capon 13.00 2.00 Plants of Arizona, Field Guide Epple 18.75 2.75 Plants of Florissant Fossil Beds Nat’l Monument Edwards & Weber 2.50 2.00 Plants of the Rocky Mountains Kershaw et al. 16.50 2.75 Prairie Garden, Creating a Shortgrass Prairie Garden Brune 3.25 1.25 Prairie Plants and Their Environment Weaver 11.00 2.00 -- Prairie Wildflowers of Northern Rocky Mts. Strickler 7.50 2.00 Retracing Major Stephen H. Long’s 1820 Expedition Goodman & Lawson 31.50 2.75 Rocky Mountain Berry Book Krum 9.00 2.00 Rocky Mountain Flora Weber 16.00 2.00 Rocky Mountain Flower Finder Wingate 4.00 2.00 Sagebrush Country: A Wildflower Sanctuary Taylor 11.00 2.00 Scat and Tracks Halfpenny 7.50 2.00 Simplified Guide to Common Colorado Grasses, A Wingate 3.25 1.25 Southern Rockies, Sierra Club Guide Benedict 16.00 2.(xr Tallgrass Prairie Wildflowers Ladd 15.00 2.75. Utah Flora, A, 1993 edition Welsh et al. 68.00 3.75 Vascular Plants of Montana Dorn 10.50 2.00 Vascular Plants of Wyoming (1992 ed.) Dorn 13.00 2.00 Weeds of the West (1996 ed.) Whitson, Editor 18.00 3.75 Western Trees, Field Guide to Stuckey & Palmer 8.50 2.00 Wild about Wildflowers Warren 16.00 2.00 Wildflowers of the Plateau & Canyon Country Ulrich 15.00 2.75 Xeriscape Flower Gardener Knopf 14.00 2.75 Shipping/handling applies only if books are mailed to purchaser Shipping/handling Total Book Total Colorado residents please add appropriate sales tax for book total. (City of Boulder 7.41%, Other Boulder County 4,15%, Denver 7.30%, Ft. Collins 6.65%, Sales Tax Adams, Arapahoe, Jefferson Counties 3.80%, all other areas in Colorado 3.00%) 4, Make Checks out to CoNPS; Include NAME, ADDRESS, COUNTY, and DAYTIME PHONE. TOTAL Vol. 22 No. 6 Aquilegia Page 11 Crested Wheatgrass in Colorado William A. Weber, RL.S. y Professor arid Curator Emeritus, University of Colorado My treatments of what we call crested 1938. As the name suggests, it has been /orme, but a new treatment is being devel- wheatgrass have varied over the years, and used for many years on golf fairways. The oped that should resolve the differences I am not satisfied including all of our rep- tetraploids, as far as I can tell, consist of A. between Sarkar’s treatment and that of resentatives under the umbrella name Roemer & Schultes and A. Dewey (1983). The following key is adapt- Agropyron cristatum. ThQxc happen to be desertorum VischQx ex Link in Colorado, ed from Sarkar (1956). diploids (2n=14), as well as tetraploids We do not have, in Colorado, any plants (2n=28). The diploid has been referred to that can be assigned to A. cristatum. This is REFERENCES CITED as “fairway crested wheat” and is readily a plant with very short, dense spikes, in Dewey, D.R. 1983. Historical and current distinguishable from the tetraploid. Sarkar - which the spikelets are very densely hir- taxonomic perspectives oi ^Agropyron, (1956) named the diploid A, cmfetiformc, sute. It is common in Central Asia. Elymus, and related genera. Crop but it now appears that there is an older Science 23: 637-642. name for this taxon, which is A. nion- There are still differences of opinion Sarkar, R 1956. Crested wheatgrass com- golicumKcxig, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 28: 305. regarding the nomenclature of A. pectini- plex. Can. J. Bot. 34: 328-345. la. Spikes short-linear, indistinctly pectinate, dense, without noticeable space between the spikelets; (glumes glabrous; culm minute- ly villous below the spike; blades glaucous) A. desertorum Fischer ex Link lb. Spikes oblong-oval, distinctly pectinate, with squarrose parallel spikelets . . . . . .(2) 2a. Spikes dense, but with noticeable space between spikelets; rachis and culm glabrous; blade smooth or scabrous . ^ . . . .A. pectiniforme Roemer & Schultes 2b. Spikes dense, with relatively less space between spikelets; rachis villous; culm minutely villous below the spike; blade sparsely hairy .A. mongolicum Keng Yellow starthistle identified on Front Range Congratulations to CoNPS President Jeff Dawson for identifying and reporting the first confirmed infestation of yellow starthistle {Centaurea solstitialis) on the Front Range. This 1,400 plant infestation at the Denver Federal Center was swiftly eradicated by local natural resource managers. Yellow starthistleas very rare in Colorado and that's the way many of us would like to keep it. After consuming more than 10 million acres in California, this invasive exotic is moving our way. If you spot a suspicious plant or patch of plants, contact your local county weed supervisor and Eric Lane, State weed co-ordinator and Board member. Yellow starthistle is easily recognized by its small, thorn-protected yellow flowers and winged stems. $ 1998 Native Plant Art Contest Winners $ The winners of the 1998 Native Plant Art Contest were from Fort Garland, Colorado Springs, and Fort Collins. Ann Gethen from Fort Garland was awarded the $100.00 first place award for her beautiful color drawing of Oenothera caespitosa (Onagraceae), the gumbo evening primrose or gumbo lily. Daryl Mergen of Colorado Springs was awarded the $50.00 second place award for ^"^an excellent sketch of our state grass Bouteloua gracilis (Poaceae), blue grama. Elizabeth Hunter of Fort Collins was awarded the $25.00 third place award for a very nice photograph of Cleome (Capparaceae), the Rocky Mountain bee plant. This contest was sponsored by CoNPS. NEW 1999 Colorado Noxious Weed Calendars For the first time in Colorado history, a calendar highlighting Colorado noxious weeds in familiar localities around the state is in production. Developed by Pitkin, La Plata, and Boulder County weed managers, as well as former Society Director Carol Spurrier, this 12-month calendar is an important addition to home or office. Gaze wistfully at Boulder’s Flatirons while drinking your morning cup of joe. Wait! Whaf s that in the foreground? A large expanse of chicory! This informative, sure-to-be a collector's item, home-grown Cal- endar is available for only $2.50 from the Colorado Big Country RC&D office, located at P.O. Box 2168, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 or call (970) 945-0727 x4. Tell 'em Eric sent ya! New CoNPS T-Shirts Now Available In conjunction with the 1998 CoNPS Annual Meeting, Denise Culver, CoNPS Treasurer developed t-shirts featuring a design by Carolyn Crawford. These t-shirts are still available at a reasonable $13.00 per shirt for members, or two for $25.00. Please contact the Society to place your order. CALENDAR CHAPTER MEETINGS FIELD TRIPS AND WORKSHOPS Boulder Chapter Nov 12 Rocky Mountain Floristic Inventories Nov 7, 8 The Helleboraceae in Colorado First Session: Saturday, November 7 Second Session: Sunday, November 8 Dec 10 Sand Sage Prairies Jan 14 Goosefoots of the Plains Fort Collins Chapter Nov 3 Corylus Taxonomy and Distribution Dec 1 Araliaceae Taxonomy, Distribution, and Disjunct Taxa Metro-Denver Chapter Dec 8 South Table Mesa Dec 5, 6 The Poaceae: How to know the Tribes First Session: Saturday, Deceniber 5 Second Session: Sunday, December 6 Jan 16, 17 Chenopodiaceae: The Goosefoot Family First Session: Saturday, January 16 Second Session: Sunday, January 17 Feb 13, 14 Colorado’s Missing Flora First Session: Saturday, February 13 Second Session: Sunday, February 14 March 6, 7 Polemoniaceae of Colorado First Session: Saturday, March 6 Second Session: Sunday, March 7 April 17, 18 Botanical Illustration: Field Sketching First Session: Saturday, April 17 Second Session: Sunday, AprU 18 Colorado Native Plant Society P.O. Box 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 > 1 ^ Non-profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Permit #1475 Denver, Colorado