Tfa ARBOREAL MAN ARBOREAL MAN BY F. WOOD JONES, M.B., D.Sc. PROFESSOR OF ANATOMY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON (LONDON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE FOR WOMEN) LONDON EDWARD ARNOLD 1916 [All rights reserved] SRLF URL an To MY WIFE PREFACE THE subject, with which the following pages deal, formed the material for certain Arris and Gale Lectures, de- livered in the Theatre of the Royal College of Surgeons of England during the years 1915 and 1916. Chapter XXI. consists of a condensed, and only partial, account of the subject treated in one such Lecture on " The Influence of the Arboreal Habit in the Evolution of the Reproduc- tive System," delivered on March 22nd, 1915; and the remaining chapters formed the basis of three Lectures on " The Influence of the Arboreal Habit in the Evolu- tion of Man," delivered on February 28th, March 1st, and March 3rd, 1916. Among their literary defects are those which are in- separable from their origin, since they are at best but elaborated notes of separated headings under which the Lectures were originally planned. The gift, which was so peculiarly conspicuous a possession of Huxley, of endowing the written page with the interest felt by the lecturer in the preparation of his subject, is a rare one. For the most part, the written notes of lectures are wont to present themselves as mere disconnected assertions, woven around a series of apparently disjointed central ideas. It is this inherent difficulty of reducing the under- lying thought, and the spoken word to a consecutive written statement, that is appealed to as an excuse for the partially woven condition in which the material is presented to the reader. And this excuse is urged the more insistently since an alternative one will readily vii viii PREFACE present itself. The want of proper literary sequence might indicate equally well that the subject had been but insufficiently thought over, that the sequence of ideas had been ill considered, and the conclusions hastily arrived at. That in this case the matter is not so can best be urged by stating that the substance of these Lectures had been collected in the form of written notes some seven years ago. Moreover, many of the details and the ideas included in these pages I have been accus- tomed to incorporate in the ordinary routine teaching of Medical Students at Manchester University, at St. Thomas's Hospital, and at the London School of Medicine for Women . I have endeavoured to acknowledge my indebtedness to the work of others wherever such a debt has been incurred. Some debts, however, cannot be considered as discharged by the mere acknowledgment of the source of a quoted passage; to Professor Arthur Keith, and to Professor G. Elliot Smith, I owe far more than is implied in the few references made directly to their written works. The figures which are reproduced here are selected from those drawn to illustrate the Lectures; they were pre- pared with especial regard for their appearance when magnified by the epidiascope rather than when reduced by the processes of reproduction. F. W. J. LONDON, October, 1916. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. THE PROBLEM OF MAN'S ORIGIN - - 1 II. THE EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE-LIMBS - 7 III. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POWER OF GRASP - 19 IV. THE SKELETON OF THE FORE-LIMB - 23 V. THE CLAVICLE - - 28 VI. THE MUSCLES OF THE FORE -LIMB - - 32 VII. THE FORE-LIMB: SUMMARY - 43 VIII. THE FATE OF THE HIND-LIMBS - - 48 IX. THE SKELETON OF THE HIND -LIMB - 53 X. THE MUSCLES OF THE HIND-LIMB - - 58 XI. OTHER ARBOREAL ADAPTATIONS OF THE HIND-LIMB 62 XII. THUMBS AND BIG TOES 67 XIII. THE HUMAN FOOT- - 73 XIV. THE RECESSION OF THE SNOUT REGION - - 84 XV. THE RECESSION OF THE JAWS AND REDUCTION OF THE TOOTH SERIES - 90 XVI. THE FACE AND THE CRANIUM - 96 XVII. THE SPINOUS PROCESSES OF THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN 101 XVIII. THE POISE OF THE HEAD AND THE CURVES OF THE SPINE - - 114 XIX. THE PELVIS AND THE VISCERA - - 123 XX. THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM - 131 XXI. THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM - 138 XXII. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BRAIN - 149 XXIII. THE STORY OF TACTILE IMPRESSIONS - 157 XXIV. MOTOR IMPRESSIONS - 162 XXV. IMPRESSIONS OF SIGHT AND HEARING - - 174 XXVI. HIGHER DEVELOPMENTS OF CEREBRAL FUNCTIONS- 180 ix x CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE XXVII. HIGHER DEVELOPMENTS OF CEREBRAL FUNCTIONS: POSSIBLE ANATOMICAL BASIS - - 190 XXVIII. THE BRAIN AND THE BODY - 196 XXIX. THE HUMAN BABY - 201 XXX. ARBOREAL ACTIVITIES OF MODERN MAN - 207 XXXI. THE FAILURES OF ARBOREAL LIFE - - 212 XXXII. THE UPRIGHT POSTURE - - 221 BIBLIOGRAPHY - - 225 INDEX - - - - - - 227 ARBOREAL MAN CHAPTER I ^> THE PROBLEM OF MAN'S ORIGIN IT is a strangely difficult thing, for one of our generation, to picture the acuteness of the upheaval brought about in 1859 by the publication of the " Origin of Species." It is hard to realize that there should have been so much novelty in the ideas expressed in the book that thought should have been overwhelmed by the new teaching ; that " evolution " should have become a creed; and that " special creation " should have become an obsession. So many suggestions had gone forth before, so much of the path had been paved for evolution, that it seems strange how the basal idea that species were not specially created, and definitely fixed types of life, should have suddenly, as a flame, lit up the fires of the most bitter controversy carried on in modern times. It is the more wonderful when we think that, at any rate as far as the scientific world was concerned, Darwin was by no means standing as the pioneer of evolution; but was only the thoughtful student who was putting forward some easily understood explanation of the manner in which evolution had been effected. And yet of the upheaval of thought that occurred we, separated by more than fifty years from the advent of that work, can feel the bitter reality when turning the pages of any contemporary periodical in the columns of which some of the many battles were waged. Even when 1 2 ARBOREAL NAN the opening period of hasty and unreasoning partisanship was passed, and after the first skirmishes had been fought and won for the principle of evolution, there still remained the biggest battle of all to be contested. Fifty years ago even an ardent evolutionist would feel no difficulty in keeping as a mental reservation the belief that, though no doubt the lesser beasts had been subject to the laws of gradual change, Man was aloof from all this and was a divine, a special, and a perfected creation. This mental reservation is, not unnaturally, still prevalent to-day; and I think that in 1916 one would give but an ill picture of the popular progress of the ideas first made definite by the work of Darwin, if one assumed that, in the dying of controversy, there had of necessity been a really wide acceptance of the picture of a simple evolutionary origin of Man. How completely Man can be separated, by a series of mental processes, from all the laws known to govern the modifications and progress of lower animals, even by a man of the highest scientific attainments, may be realized by the reading of such a work as the final effort of Thomas Dwight, the late distinguished Pro- fessor of Anatomy of Harvard. What Dwight, pos- sessed of a vast store of knowledge of the structure and variations of Man and the lower animals, could do, a great host of others can do in the comfortable absence of any such precise knowledge which might influence the attitude they elected to adopt. Still, despite the mental reservations of the thinking few, and the unthinking many, the questions must be asked and answered: What are the factors of habit or environment, and what are the steps of " adaptation," " variation," or " sporting " which have led to the evolu- tion of Man as a zoological type ? We start, therefore, with the assumption that we accept the principle of evolution as a fact, and that we extend this principle to embrace Man. " Adaptation," "varia- tion," and " sporting " have been named in that order of THE PROBLEM OF MAN'S ORIGIN 3 set purpose, and for a very special reason which must be briefly defined. Change comes about somehow in animal types, that must be admitted, else there could be no groundwork for the play of evolution. Change might conceivably come about by " adaptation," and by that is meant the reaction of the animal to its life surroundings. John Hunter (1728-1793) had a clear conception of this in- fluence, and his life work might be summed up by saying that he saw, with the eye of a genius, the dependence of structure on function. With the alteration of function — not uncommonly as a result of change of environment or habit — structure, in the individual, shows harmonious change. As an inheritable, and so as an evolutionary, factor, this adaptation of structure to function is especially associated with the name of Jean Baptiste de Monet, Chevalier de Lamarck (1744-1829), who, quite Hunterian in his conceptions, appreciated to the full the influences of " use and disuse " upon organs and systems. Changes, again, might be brought about, not by special, definite, and purposive " adaptations," but by slight " variations," and by " variations " we here mean those trivial congenital differences, always displayed among individuals, which are the progeny of parents possessing varied individualities. Variation, aided by natural selec- tion, constitutes that particular method of effecting change in living things especially associated with the name of Charles Darwin (1809-1882). By " sporting " or "muta- tion " is understood, not a purposive adaptation, nor a mere gradually accumulating minor congenital variation, but the more or less sudden appearance of a " freak," if one may so express it, among the offspring of an individual. Evolution, by sporting or by mutation, is a more modern conception, associated in the main with the name of De Vries, and a host of contemporary workers. These are ideas that are, or have been, current in 4 ARBOREAL MAN accounting for change in the living world. Change comes about in some way— that is obvious; by what channel or channels it comes about concerns the present inquiry but little. How it is transmitted once it came into being, how it is accumulated, perfected, and handed on are questions which, despite an enormous amount of work, and despite an accumulated literature of dogmatic, and sometimes unjustified assertion, are at present unknown. Without touching upon these problems it is proposed to examine the probable path by which the Primates and Man have originated, reviewing the influences that have probably reacted upon them, but leaving aside the ques- tions as to how changes have come into being, and how such changes have been inherited. We will therefore define our position by saying that change has been effected somehow, and somehow it has been handed on ; and that any attempt to chronicle the progress of these changes need not be branded as Lamarckian or impossible, as Darwinian or improbable, as mutationist or orthodox, unless definite assertions are made as to the exact mode or means by which these alterations have come into being, or have become handed on and stereotyped. Man has often been discussed as an evolutionary pro- duct ; the literature of the last fifty years teems with works upon that special aspect of anthropology which deals with Man as the highest of the Primates. There is nothing to be added to the brilliant generalizations of Huxley, nothing to be altered in the careful analysis of primate and human characters carried out by Keith. One reason only has appealed to the writer as an excuse for the publication of these lectures, and that is the fact that the paleonto- logical history of Man is rapidly enlarging. Any new find of a so-called " missing link " may bring us by chance nearer to deciding in what type human divergence first manifested itself. Disputes concerning the zoological rank of such finds will, in all probability, be carried on with extreme vigour for many years to come. That is THE PROBLEM OF MAN'S ORIGIN 5 inevitable, and it can only result, in the end, in a gain to the scientific knowledge of the origin of Man. Mean- while it is advisable to take stock of what is probable concerning the phylogenetic story of Man, in order to see if there is any stage in his evolution at which he, or his remains, might be labelled as human. Not so long ago there would have been no hesitation in asserting what type was, and what was not, human. Man began as Man, and that was the beginning and the end of it. We have definitely passed that stage. To-day we have a bewilder- ing complexity of genera and species of missing links; but we still have a more or less definite conception of what we would term a human being. It has been claimed that the possession of the ability to speak constitutes an essential feature of the dawning human being, and it has even been imagined that, from a study of the fragmentary physical remains of missing links, the presence or absence of this faculty could be determined. Physical remains cannot provide the material from which certain know- ledge upon this point may be gleaned. There is no more reason for saying that some such missing link could not speak because some divergence from the modern human type is found in the construction of the jaw, than there is for asserting that a monkey cannot play the piano because the anatomy of his hand differs in some details from that of a human pianist. No ape has become an orator, and no monkey a distinguished performer upon the piano ; but we must not seek the reason for this in the departures from the standard human form seen in the structure of their jaws and hands. Speech, and piano- playing, are the outcomes of a series of elaborations of cerebral processes which are present in existing Man, but not in existing monkeys. We have no certain physical clue in the fragmentary remains of missing links con- cerning the presence or absence of these elaborations of cerebral processes. There is a very prevalent idea that the assumption of 6 AKBOREAL MAN the upright posture in terrestrial progression gave to Man those special attributes which we would term human. There can be no possible doubt that the faculty for striding about upright upon the surface of the earth marked a very real phase in evolution. But when we come to examine the possible influences which preceded this departure, we can only regard it as a natural and culminating phase of a long series of changes which had taken place in an altogether different environment. Were the whole series of missing links to be paraded before us in the form of their frag- mentary remains which are yet to be discovered, he would be a bold man who would point to any individual member as the one in which the features of terrestrial uprightness argued humanity. Arboreal uprightness preceded ter- restrial uprightness ; and it is the purpose of these studies to show, in some measure, the extent to which Man is indebted to, and was perfected in, arboreal life. Man comes of an arboreal stock. Two questions arise. When in the phylogeny of the Mammals did this stock become arboreal, and when did it give rise to a creature which we could possibly term human ? The first ques- tion is capable of an approximate solution; the second is unanswerable, but we may say with regard to it that, if the term " humanoid " may be permitted, such a stock may have had a very early representation among the mammalian fauna. CHAPTER II THE EMANCIPATION OP THE PORE-LIMBS WE may not here turn aside to inquire into the origin of limbs, nor pause to consider the questions which of neces- sity arise out of the fact that, while all Vertebrates are limited to four limbs, the Invertebrates know no such limitation. We will start with the facts as we know them: that Vertebrates possess four outgrowths from the body seg- ments, arranged as a symmetrical pectoral, and a sym- metrical pelvic, pair of limbs ; and that these limbs appear probably in their elemental form as the fins of fishes. We may assume that the most primitive type of Verte- brate limb is an appendage, which is adapted for the purpose of ordered and regulated progression. Limbs may merely propel the aquatic vertebrate body in a definite direction as oars propel a boat; and yet, even when we may regard them as a new acquisition in the Vertebrate phylum, they already subserve other func- tions. Some fishes propel themselves through the water by movements of their fins — they "swim"; but the source of real propulsion in a great many is the lateral movements of the tail, the fins serving far more as balanc- ing and regulating organs than as a means of propulsion through the water. This possibility of the limbs develop- ing a balancing function is one that becomes greatly elaborated in the story of the limbs of higher animals. We are more immediately concerned here with the limbs of those Vertebrates higher than the fishes; and the type of limb from which we will start our comparisons 7 8 ARBOREAL MAN is that seen in living forms among the tailed Amphibians, and in some of the less specialized Reptiles. This we may define as a limb of three segments: arm, forearm, and hand; thigh, leg, and foot (see Fig. 1). The first segment consists of muscles massed round one central bone— humerus or femur; the second segment of two parallel bones— ulna and radius, or fibula and tibia, and FIG. 1.— DlAGEAMMATIC DRAWING TO SHOW THE CONDITION OF PRIMITIVE LIMBS. their regulating muscles ; and the third of a series of small bones — carpals or tarsals, with the muscles and bones of the separate digits. This limb is possessed of a high degree of mobility. It can move in all directions on the trunk at the shoulder and hip joints; the second segment is enabled to move on the first by bending or straighten- ing of the elbow or knee; the two parallel bones of the second segment may move upon each other, so that the third segment may be moved with the second, and be turned (at any rate to some extent) palm or sole up — supinated, or knuckles up — pronated (see Figs. 2, 3). Finally the third segment is free to move on the second in a variety of ways at the wrist and ankle. Such is the limb which is the heritage of all land-living Vertebrates, and such a limb is beyond doubt the heritage of the an- cestral Mammal. The functions of this primitive limb are simple in the extreme; it enables the animal to walk about under water, and it serves to drag the animal about EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE-LIMBS 9 on land. By its mobility it produces movement, but it does not support the weight of the animal's body. It is a propelling, but not a supporting, limb (see Fig. 4). A FIG. 2. — HUMAN FOREARM WITH THE HAND TURNED PALMAR SURFACE UPWARDS — SUPINATED. I'IG. 3. — HUMAN FOREARM WITH THE HAND TURNED PALMAR SURFACE DOWNWARDS — PRONATED. FIG. 4. — DIAGRAMMATIC OUTLINE OF A PRIMITIVE TYPE OF VERTEBRATE WITH PROPELLING, BUT NOT SUPPORTING, LIMBS. very near approximation to our ideal primitive limb is seen in the ordinary water newt. We may readily appre- ciate, in watching such an animal, the perfection with io ARBOREAL MAN which its limbs enable it to walk at the bottom of its tank, to clamber over obstacles, or climb aquatic plants. But we note that when on dry land its activities are con- siderably hampered, since while its limbs propel it for- wards they no longer carry its weight, and the body « dragged along the ground. " On thy belly shalt thou go " applies to the pioneers of the land-living Vertebrates ; for their limbs are not yet adapted to supporting their bodies and carrying them sheer of the ground. Mobility is the keynote of this primitive limb. WitJ the permanent exchange of an aquatic for a terrestrial habitat the limbs took on a new function, for in addition to acting as mere propellers, they now serve to lift the body during the act of propulsion. With this change a new demand is made in the structure of the limb, for stability must be added to mobility. There is a gradual evolution of this new function. The limbs at first support the body only during the act of propulsion; when the movement is over, the body sinks to rest upon the ground. In the next phase the support of the body by the limbs becomes permanent ; the demand for stability in the limbs is increased. There is an antagonism in this evolution between the advantage of elaborating the ancestral, and useful, mobility of the limb, and the need for the newly developed, and essential, quality of stability. It is in this antagonism of developmental needs that the great interest of the study lies. In such a question as this the records of paleontology are likely to furnish much material assistance, and it is from the paleontologist that the most definite pronounce- ments may be expected. The remains of animals furnish some clear guides as to the possibility of their limbs being supporting as well as propelling organs, and the geological period at which animals possessing such limbs first appeared seems to be generally agreed on. We find in this feature, as we shall repeatedly find again in relation to other things, that the search for these animals must be EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE -LIMBS 11 pushed very far back in the geological record, and when, it is so pushed back it leads to a curious group of animals known as the Therapsida, which, presenting a blend of primitive reptilian and primitive mammalian characters, nourished in the Triassic. It was, according to Broom, among the South African members of the Therapsida especially that the limbs became supporting organs, and he has said very definitely that " when the Therapsidan took to walking with its feet underneath and its body off the ground it first became possible for it to become a I warm-blooded animal." The change that we have been ! picturing was, therefore, one which took place very far back in the geological past; and, according to Broom, the supporting limb and the mammalian possibilities made their appearance together, the one being dependent upon the other. The characters of the supporting limb as opposed to the purely propelling, but not supporting, limb are so definite that there should be but little hesi- tation on the part of an anatomist in assigning the proper functions to the limbs of any extinct form. But it cannot be said that the geologist, when assuming the r61e of an articulator of the skeletons of extinct monsters, has always shown a nice appreciation of these characters. A visit to the geological galleries of any museum will reveal instances of animals, the limbs of which are articulated for a function that they had no power to perform. Looking broadly at the Mammals, we may say that the preservation and elaboration of the inherited mobility of the fore-limb is an essential for the culmination of evolu- tion. We may also say that this preservation of mobility must start very early, before ancestral mobility had become lost in the development of stability; and that the most successful Mammals must, by some means or other, have preserved and stereotyped this mobility almost at the outset of their mammalian career. Again, we may say that two distinct lines have been followed. Some mammals have perfected the new, and mammalian, de- 12 ARBOREAL MAN mand for stability; and others have retained a primitive mobility in, at least, the fore-limb. It is the latter which have been successful and have become dominant. The problem we are attempting to solve is : Why have some Mammals retained this primitive feature of mobility of the fore-limb, and why have these same Mammals become more successful in the struggle of evolution ? We are here face to face with a fundamental problem, and it is now necessary that we should, as it were, take sides. Man possesses a mobile fore-limb which takes no part in the support or the progression of his body. He is the culmination of a line of ancestors which, on alto- gether different grounds, is distinct enough in general outlines. The question is: Does the stock from which Man arose retain a primitive mobile fore-limb, or has he evolved his present posture and the present freedom of his fore-limb from a previously four-footed or quadru- pedal ancestor ? It may be said with truth that every teaching of modern orthodox anatomy and anthropology would lead us to believe that Man had evolved from a quadrupedal pronograde mammalian stage. With that it is impossible to disagree so long as it is made perfectly clear that the stock from which Man is derived was differentiated so early in the mammalian story, that the primitive mobility of the fore-limb had never been sacri- ficed to the needs of stability. There are two ways of regarding this problem. We may assume that the primi- tive mammal passed into a regular pronograde four- footed stage with four supporting limbs, and from that stage Man evolved into an animal characterized by an orthograde or upright posture. Or we may imagine that the stock from which Man was derived had never been typically pronograde with four supporting limbs ; that in this stock mobility had never become sacrificed to sta- bility in all four limbs. It is in the former view, the assumption of the upright posture from a pronograde EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE-LIMBS 13 stage, that much of the interest of the modern study of human morphology is centred. It is the latter view, that the human stock has never been typically prono- grade and four-footed, that is here put forward as the truth. In attempting to maintain this view, definite answers must be given to three questions. The first: What was the factor that saved the particular mammalian stock which culminated in Man from becoming four-footed pronogrades?" We will answer by saying at once, " The arboreal habit." The second: "When did this factor come into play in the philogenetic history of the Mam- mals?" We will dismiss this by asserting that it was at the very outset, at the very dawn of mammalian life. The anatomical basis for this assertion will be given in detail later on. The third: " How did this factor enable that particular stock to acquire supremacy?" will be answered, so far as is possible, by the study of the influence of the arboreal habit upon the animal body. We will deal first with the influence of the arboreal habit upon the structure and function of the limbs. We are assuming that the primitive Mammal, new born from the Therapsidian ancestor, possesses limbs such as ws have defined, with but little stability, but with a high degree of mobility, and this mobility includes the power of rotating the second and third segments around the central axis of the limb in the actions of pronation and supination. The effects of mammalian habit upon these limbs will probably be best appreciated by following the story as it is unfolded in animals that directed their newly acquired mammalian possibilities into the natural channel of supremacy in walking and running over the surface of the earth. All four limbs of such an animal will become equalty developed as organs of support and of progression (see Fig. 5). Mobility at shoulder, elbow and wrist, hip, knee and ankle will be essential, but stability becomes a prime 14 ARBOREAL MAN necessity, and the rotation of the parallel bones of the second segment is a hindrance to perfect stability. Little by little this power of rotation becomes lost; the muscles which produce the movements of pronation and supina- tion disappear, or change their action, the joints between the two parallel bones become less perfect; finally the FIG. 5. — DIAGRAMMATIC DRAWING TO SHOW THE CONDITION OF LlMBS WHICH HAVE BECOME THOROUGHLY STABLE, AND FUNCTION BOTH AS PROPELLING AND SUPPORTING ORGANS. two bones fuse together, and one member of the pair practically ceases to exist. Again, the digits, except by virtue of the nails or claws which they bear, cease to be of great individual importance, and some of them soon become reduced to the condition of mere rudiments. The final stage of this process is exemplified in the horse, where one functional digit alone remains, upon the nail (hoof) of which the animal is supported. These four limbs are now stable props which, capable of very definite and specialized movements, support the animal and EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE-LIMBS 15 enable it to walk and run with the very greatest perfec- tion. As a general statement, we have said that the evolution that produces limbs of this type also demands that all four members shall function alike, fore-limbs and hind-limbs being both supporting and ambulatory organs. This statement needs some qualification, since there are certain exceptions to the rule that all four limbs are functionally of equal importance in the Mammals that have taken to a pronograde terrestrial life ; and it is these exceptions that are of interest. In different types of quadrupedal Mammals there may be well-marked differ- ences in the actual method of movement of the limbs in ordinary leisured progression. A right fore-limb and a left hind-limb may be raised simultaneously from the ground and swung forwards; this is the mode of the greater number of quadrupeds. Again, a right fore-limb and a right hind-limb may be raised and advanced simultaneously ; this is the ordinary mode of progression of the giraffe. Or, again, the sequence of bringing the limbs into play may vary with the pace at which the animal travels; and then the animal changes its gait and its stride as the pace varies. An altogether different method may manifest itself with this change of gait in response to the demands of pace, and both fore- limbs and both hind-limbs may be raised and advanced alternately. This mode is habitual in the ordinary quiet gait of some animals ; it is the usual way in which a rabbit moves about when feeding undisturbed. In this method of movement the fore-limbs and the hind-limbs may play an equal part, or the hind-limbs may take an increasing share in the work, both of supporting the body, and of urging it forward. In this way a more and more perfect hop is developed; when this method of progression has reached its most advanced stage the fore-limb is freed very thoroughly from its duties of support. Hopping is a specialized development of the pronograde gait; and it has led to some very interesting developments which 16 ARBOREAL MAN have a bearing upon the present study. To these hop- ping animals we will return. We will now come back to our primitive Mammal with its four mobile limbs, and picture it taking, not to a ter- restrial, but to an arboreal life. I imagine that the first stages of this advance could be pictured as being built upon the ability the animal already possessed of sur- mounting such obstacles as chanced to lie in its terres- trial path. The ability which such a primitive Mammal would have for climbing might perhaps be gauged by having regard for that skill in clambering which is mani- fested in the tailed Amphibians, a skill which we must remember develops within the limits of their own Phylum (in the Tree Frogs) into perhaps the most perfected tree- climbing displayed in the Vertebrate series. It may seem a long way to go back when attempting to unravel the influences of tree-climbing among the Primates, to appeal to the clambering activities of the water-newt. And yet the anatomical condition of the limbs of Man demands a shifting backward of the inquiry to some such stage as this. I believe that the truest picture of the evolution of Primate climbing starts with such a scene as we are depicting now. The method of this amphibian or reptilian clambering must be appreciated, for, as we shall see, climbing may be conducted in several different ways; and the particular method practised by any animal may serve to date the evolutionary stage at which the habit was adopted. An Amphibian, or unspecialized Reptile, ascends an obstacle by clambering up; its feet are applied to the surface of the obstacle up which it clambers. It makes no attempt to obtain a grip by nails or claws, but it trusts merely to the apposition of its feet to the surface to which it clings, and when this fails the animal falls. Two points must be especially noticed. As its progress continues, it repeatedly reaches ahead with one or other of its fore-limbs for a new hold, and whilst doing this its EMANCIPATION OF THE FORE LIMBS 17 body weight is temporarily thrown upon its hind-limbs. And, again, in reaching out its fore-limb, the freedom of rotation possessed by the second segment of the limb allows the animal to apply the palmar surface of its " hand " against any new hold which may present itself at almost any angle. From such a humble beginning great developments are possible; and here we may observe that, without the apprenticeship served in this lowly clambering, short cuts to tree-climbing have never attained the same ultimate perfection. As arboreal life becomes more complete, the search for a new foothold will become a far more exact- ing business than it is in the mere clambering we have pictured. The more exacting this search becomes, the more will there tend to be developed that most impor- tant factor — the, specialization of the functions of the fore and hind limbs. While the animal reaches about with its fore-limb, the hind-limb becomes the supporting organ. With the evolution of this process there comes about a final liberation of the fore-limb from any such servile function as supporting the weight of the body : it becomes a free organ full of possibilities, and already capable of many things. This process I am terming the emancipa- tion of the fore-limb, and its importance as an evolutionary factor appears to me to be enormous. It will be noted that in the little picture we have drawn of the process, we have, as it were, rescued the fore-limb ; rescued it while still possessed of all its inherited power of mobility, saved it from becoming an organ of mere stability, and handed it over to an enterprising mammalian stock to adapt to its needs. This picture may seem fanciful, and yet in reality it is not so. I have thought it worth while to draw it thus, since, without such a picture, there are many things very difficult to understand. I will instance two such cases. We have hurried almost breathlessly over the process we have pictured, in a mental anxiety to arrive at emanci- IS ARBOREAL MAN pation of the fore-limb before the limb had lost any of its possibilities of mobility. This we have done because of the knowledge that once the limb has become a sup- porting organ, and given up its birthright of mobility for the acquired stability, no subsequent degree of liberation, due to altered habits, will achieve the same, great possi- bilities in evolution. Animals have liberated fore-limbs already made stable, or partially stable, and they have not attained the great results which we shall follow in the stock we have been picturing. It is thus with the jumping animals we have mentioned previously. The liberation of the fore-limb may be very complete, but it is a fore- limb of restricted possibilities that has been liberated. The arboreal habit alone is not the talisman; other mammalian stocks have taken to an arboreal habit ; but they have taken to it after varied periods of quadrupedal life. They have taken to it too late to derive the full benefits from it, for they took to it with the fore-limbs already deprived of some of their inherited mobility. Such animals never become perfect tree-climbers. They may acquire an extraordinary skill in running about the branches of trees as many Rodents do. or they may even climb in the proper sense of the word, but in this climbing the grip is not obtained by the application of the palmar surface of the hand, but by the hook-like action of claws and nails; this method is practised by many of the Car- nivora. The maximum of possibilities is not attainable in any of these cases. It is not enough to have a thor- oughly emancipated fore-limb, it is not enough to be thoroughly arboreal. It was a combination of seemingly humble and unimportant circumstances, acting at the very dawn of mammalian life, which permitted the eman- cipation of an unmodified fore-limb in a certain stock, and so laid the direct path for the evolution of the highest Mammals, and Man. CHAPTER III THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POWER OF GRASP WE have noted that the primitive animal we have been picturing could place the palm of its hand against any new hold with which it came into contact, and that the power of rotation possessed by its forearm enabled this contact to take place at a variety of angles. Its palms, for instance, may both be turned inwards so that a branch or other object can be held between their two opposed surfaces. This is a power which remains in the possession of many animals even after they have lost much of the primitive mobility of the fore-limb in quadrupedal life. As a general rule, the hopping animals and the semi- arboreal animals retain sufficient mobility to do this. Some of them can hold their food pressed between the two palms, and so are enabled to sit up and eat food held between their fore-paws. Others, which cannot attain to this, yet preserve sufficient mobility of the fore-limb to enable them to use it for a variety of minor purposes. The more thoroughly quadrupedal the animal is, the less is it able to turn its fore-limb to these minor uses. Familiarly, we may note that the typically quadrupedal dog will use its hind-feet for scratching, even the fore-end of its body; while the cat will scratch and wash its face with its fore-foot. But we are dealing, in possibilities, with something far bigger and more important than such things as these. We must not forget that in rescuing the fore-limb in its primitive mobile stage, before quadru- pedal life had in any way impaired its power of rotation, we saved not only a primitive second segment, but a 19 20 ARBOREAL MAN primitive third segment as well. We may now say that we have rescued the third segment as a hand, and so preserved it from ever becoming a mere paw or a hoof. This is most important— perhaps as important a thing as ever happened in any evolutionary story— for the permanent preservation of a primitive hand, affixed to a primitive rotating forearm, made possible a great number of the most far-reaching developments. By a primitive hand we mean a very definite thing, and one essential in the make-up of this hand is the possession of five separate, and fairly equally developed, digits. We have made use of the water-newt to picture some stages of fore-limb development, but we may not press comparisons with this type into minute details. The hand of existing Amphibians does not fulfil all the demands of our definition, for only four digits are present in living tailed members, and four well-developed digits, with a rudiment of a fifth, in living tailless forms. But there are several extinct forms of generalized Amphibia and Reptilia which had what we may truly term a primi- tive hand, and among the living and unspecialized Reptilia it is still to be met with. It is a very remark- able fact that in the numerical development of the individual bones which compose the separate fingers, the Chelonians (Tortoises and Turtles) are the match of Man and his nearest mammalian neighbours. There is evidently something extraordinarily primitive about the hand that has been preserved and passed on to Man ; but like the primitive rotating forearm, this primitive, simple and unspecialized five-fingered hand is full of possibilities. These possibilities are given their chance of development, and are made the most of under the circumstances we are picturing — circumstances which include the emanci- pation of the fore-limb as one of the effects of the dawn of arboreal life. This primitive hand possesses muscles which can move it upon the ulna and radius at the wrist- joint, and muscles which can bend the fingers in towards DEVELOPMENT OF THE POWER OF GRASP 21 the palm (flexors), and others which can straighten them out again (extensors). It is these ringer muscles which now become so important. We have noticed that some of the less perfect tree-climbers run with great skill about the branches, and that others climb rather than run, but they obtain a grip by the specialized use of nails or claws. It is a characteristic of the pioneer tree-climbers we are picturing that they begin to grasp by the flexion of their fingers, and obtain their grip, not by claws or foot-pads or nails, but by an actual approximation of the hand and the fingers to the objects up which they desire to climb. The power to grasp with the hand and fingers seems such a very simple accomplishment that it is difficult to realize how such an apparently trivial beginning can have produced the tremendous changes that follow in its train. In essence its beginning depends upon the pre- servation of a primitive second segment of the fore-limb, for this has permitted the animal in its endeavours at climbing to place the palmar surface of its hand and fingers flat against the next hold for which it reaches out. The mobility of the second segment already allows of an adjustment of the hand to the object encountered. Next, the hand by virtue of its flexor muscles makes the adjustment more complete. In this way we may imagine the fingers are closed over smaller branches, and the animal begins to grasp. Although the picture is entirely fanciful, we may imagine that the higher the animal climbs (the more perfectly arboreal it becomes), the smaller the branches encountered, and so the more per- fect the adjustment of the finger grasp. This picture, although it may be dismissed as thoroughly outside the precise demands of science, is nevertheless a useful one, since in dealing with the modifications of such a primitive fore-limb it is perfectly true to say that the more thor- oughly an animal becomes an arboreal creature, the more perfect becomes its hand grasp. The animal now reaches 22 ARBOREAL MAN out with its fore-limb, throws its body weight temporarily upon its hind-limbs, and then with its hand catches hold of something ahead, and so helps to raise its body. This is true tree-climbing. It is a critical stage in evolution. The power of the hand grasp has made possible the fore- runners of the Primates, has perfected the evolution of the Primates, and paved the way for the development of Man. At first, one would suppose this newly acquired power to be used solely for grasping the branches in arboreal progression, for catching hold of objects ahead, and for hanging on whilst a new foothold is secured. But with its developing perfection we may imagine the grasp used for other purposes, and some of these purposes we will enumerate here, but will discuss in detail later. The animal, from grasping branches, may readily turn to grasping leaves and fruit— it may learn to grasp its food in its hand. As a sequel it may learn to convey the food so grasped to its mouth with its hand, and so become a hand-feeder. It may take to grasping other objects which come in its way. These objects may be useful for food or they may not ; but the animal will learn to form an estimate of the object grasped. As a sequel it may learn to feel, and to test novel objects with its hand. Again, the mother may learn to grasp her offspring in the precarious circumstances of an arboreal infancy ; and she may adopt the habit of carrying and nursing her baby. All these things are of vast importance, and will be discussed according to the headings under which they appropriately fall. CHAPTER IV THE SKELETON OF THE FORE-LIMB WHAT exactly we are to regard as the most simple con- dition of the actual skeletal structures of the fore-limb of the primitive land-living Vertebrate is, of course, open to some doubt; that we shall not be very far wrong in assuming it to be generally similar to that which is present in the most generalized Amphibians and Reptiles is certain. At the time of mammalian divergence from the Therapsid ancestor, we may assume the limb to be of this primitive Reptilian type, with the added tendency to a general lengthening, to which Broom has attached so much importance. In such a primitive limb there is a proximal humerus free to move upon the pectoral girdle at the shoulder- joint. The next segment consists of a pre-axial radius and a post-axial ulna, both bones articulating with the humerus at the elbow-joint, and at that joint both are flexed and extended on the humerus. Each bone is free of the other, so that movements of rotation can take place between them. Both bones of the second segment articulate with the first roAV of the carpal bones, so that although the hand is flexed and extended on the forearm, it is rotated with the forearm. Discussions as to what is the primitive condition of the carpus, and how this primitive condition has been de- parted from in different types, open up the possibilities for widely divergent views. We will here adopt the oldest and simplest teaching — that of Gegenbaur, which is backed by the greatest weight of evidence. Three bones enter into the formation of the first row 23 24 ARBOREAL MAN of the carpus-a pre-axial bone (radiale), an intermediate bone (Jermedinm), and a post-axial bone (ulnare. The second row is composed of five small and fairly uniform bones (Carpalia L-V.), one being situated at the base of each metacarpal. Between the two rows, and situated in the middle of the carpus, is a central element (centrale) (We may, in modern morphology, be forced to depart slightly from the classical scheme of Gegenbaur, in admitting the possible presence of more than one centrale, but this possibility does not detract from the simplicity of the main plan.) As to the number of rays in the distal segment of the limb, we know that among the lowest Vertebrates which lead aquatic lives they may be extremely numerous; in the most primitive of the higher land-living classes this is changed, and the possession of five terminal elements has become the rule. This change is undoubtedly associated with the development of extra-neural ribs and the formation of intra-costal limb plexuses, the number of epiblastic segments entering into the limb plexuses being now restricted to five, represented by the five roots entering into the formation of the brachial plexus. 1 These five terminal digits are composed of a series of separate jointed elements, metacarpals and phalanges, of which there are primitively (or at any rate in very primi- tive types, if not in basic form) one metacarpal and three phalanges, or four separate elements, in each digit (see Fig. 6). Taking the Mammalia as a whole, and selecting from any and every type the most unaltered feature of every segment of the limb, regardless of the condition of the other segments, we may estimate the amount of minimal departure from this archsetype consistent with that stage of evolution represented by the Mammalia. The skeletal elements of the first and second segments may persist quite unaltered in a large number of Mammals. The bones of the first row of the carpus and the os THE SKELETON OF THE FORE-LIMB 25 centrale may remain in the ideal condition. The bones of the second row invariably show a fusion between carpale IV. and carpale V. into the unciform bone. The primitive five digits may persist, but an invariable reduction takes place in the elements composing the pollex, which consists of only three segments instead of the ideal four. The immediate interest lies in the fact that these conditions of minimal departure from the primitive type are combined in the individual only within the limits of the Primates and those other animals which we believe to be immediately related to them (see Fig. 7). All other Mammals, though retaining primitive features of FIG. 6. — THE SKELETON OF THE HAND OF A WATER TORTOISE (Chelydea ser- pentina). (AFTER GEGEN- BAUR.) FIG. 7.— THE CARPUS AS IT EXISTS IN SOME PRI- MATES. The os centrale is a separate element. the fore-limb here and there, show in some other respects wider departures from the ideal. Among the Primates we have skeletal fore-limb elements so little altersd from the ideal type that the humerus 26 ARBOREAL MAN and ulna and radius remain in their primitive condition. The first row of the carpal bones articulates with both ulna and radius, and consists of all the ideal elements; radiale (scaphoid), intermedium (semilunar), and ulnare (cuneiform) are all separate and normal. The os centrale is present. Carpale I. (trapezium), carpale II. (trapezoid) , and carpale III. (os magnum) are separate, and not greatly changed; carpale IV. and carpale V. are fused into the unciform. The five digits are all present in a very primitive condition, the pollex alone lacking one of its elements. In addition to these slight modifications an ulnar sesamoid (pisiform) is present. Now all these departures from the ideal which are manifested in the Primate fore-limb are modifications which have their parallels in very generalized Reptilia. Fusion of carpale IV. and V. takes place even in the very generalized chelonian carpus; in the same forms also is seen the identical loss of an element in the pollex, and the development of an ulnar sesamoid. Two addi- tional modifications are present in Man and the giant Anthropoids (see Fig. 8). The centrale is lost as a separate element by fusion with the scaphoid (radiale) in Man, the Gorilla and the Chimpanzee; this, again, is a feature of some of the Lemurs and of so primitive a carpus as that seen in the Chelonia. Persistence of the os centrale in the human carpus is not an exceptionally rare anomaly, and many cases have been recorded by Gruber. Rosenberg has also shown its normal presence in the human embryo. Anomalies of the Gorilla and Chimpanzee are naturally less well known than are those of Man, but even in these animals the os centrale is known to occur exceptionally. In the orang-utan and in the Gibbon it is normal and well developed. In Man, Gorilla, Chimpanzee and Orang-utan the ulna does not directly articulate with the carpus, but is ex- cluded from contact with the cuneiform (ulnare) by the THE SKELETON OF THE FORE-LIMB 27 intervention of the triangular fibro-cartilage. This con- dition is not found in any of the more primitive forms and must be regarded as a new and possibly progressive feature. It is a fact which cannot be ignored, that in the details of its skeletal elements the fore-limb of the highest of FIG. 8. — THE ELEMENTS OF THE CARPUS AS PRESENT IN MAN, IN THE GORILLA, CHIMPANZEE AND SOME LEMURS. The os centrale is not normally present as a separate element. the Mammals finds its likeness among living Vertebrates in such a primitive creature as the Tortoise. Without indulging to the full the speculations which such a fact may prompt, we are justified in saying that the Primates have retained a fore-limb skeleton that is singularly like that with which we have every reason to believe the ancestral Mammal was endowed. CHAPTER V THE CLAVICLE ONE other skeletal element of the fore-limb needs brief mention, and this is the collar-bone, or clavicle, which is so well developed in Man. Although the homologues of the clavicle are perhaps more debated than those of any other bone in the body, it is not proposed to enter into any discussion regarding the respective merits of those theories which find the caudal homologue of the clavicle now in one, and now in another, element of the pelvic girdle. Here the clavicle will be regarded, as the work of Fawcett appears clearly to indicate, as an element peculiar to the fore-limb girdle. We will assume that the bone of the clavicle is an intramuscular ossification, making its appearance in the embryo first (at any rate in the Mammals), by two ossific centres, the one (lateral) in the deltoid-trapezius muscle sheet, and the other (median) in the pectoralis-sterno-cleido-mastoid sheet. These two ossific intramuscular intersections become continuous, and, in its complete development, the bony bar thus formed articulates at its median end with the sternum and at its lateral end with the shoulder girdle proper. We will further assume that this bony bar is a purely functional development, that it is laid down as a firm strut which keeps the shoulder girdle poised at the sides of the body, and which makes an acting point for the separated muscles that are derived from the sheets in which it is laid down (see Fig. 9). As such a strut, the clavicle is a very ancient possession of the Vertebrates. p It occurs in the Dipnoi and certain other primitive fish. THE CLAVICLE 29 It may in some fishes become complicated by other struts not primitively parts of the shoulder girdle, or it may strut the shoulder girdle, not to the sternum, but to the skull, or to some outlier of it. A clavicular strut derived from dermal bone is present also in the majority FIG. 9. — THE HUMAN SHOULDER GIRDLE, TO snow THE STRUT ACTION OF THE CLAVICLE. of the Amphibians and Reptiles. Within the limits of these groups great range of variation in development is seen; the dermal struts may attain great complexity, or they may be altogether absent, and, on the whole, a functional rather than a systematic cause underlies the degree and condition of their presence. The dermal strut occurs again in the lowest Mammals, and here in perfect reptilian complexity of structure, the condition present in the Prototheria (Duck-billed Platypus, etc.) 30 ARBOREAL MAN being likened by all comparative anatomists to that in the typical pre-mammalian Vertebrates. In the rest of the mammalian orders the appearance of the clavicle, if we take the systematic posi- tion of the animal as our guide, can only be described as hap- hazard. Among the Metatheria (Marsupials), only Perameles (the Bandicoot) fails to possess a clavicle. Among Eutheria (higher Mammals), a complete clavicle is present in all Insectivora, except the aberrent aquatic Potamogale ; it is present in some Edentata, in all Cheiroptera, and all Primates. It is entirely absent in Cetacea and Sirenia and Ungulata (see Fig. 10); in most Carnivora it appears only as a rudiment, though in some members of this order it attains a fair degree of development; in the Rodentia it is sometimes well developed and sometimes entirely absent. The only under- lying principle which seems to FIG. 10.— THE SHOULDER explain the rather random de- GlRDLE OF AN UNGU- f - ,, . , • j-.cc LATE, TO SHOW THE velopment of this bone in differ- ABSENCE OF THE CLAV- ent Mammals appears to be ICLE. found in the functional demands The fore-limb has no strut made upon the movements of to keep it poised at the the fore-limb. So long as no more demand is made than the simple backward and forward movement at the shoulder- joint, such as is seen in the walking and trotting of pure quadrupeds, this strut is either not developed, or attains no greater perfection than that of a mere isolated inter - THE CLAVICLE 3L muscular ossification. Even the simple use of the fore- limb as a paddle is carried out in the absence of any strut, and the clavicle fails to be developed in aquatic paddlers. It is the wider range of movements of the shoulder-joint, . such as culminates in the free action of circumduction, that preserves in full functional development this primi- tive vertebrate heritage in the mammalian shoulder girdle. Within the groups Carnivora and Rodentia, it is easy to see that freedom of fore-limb and clavicular develop- , ment go hand in hand. It is safe to assert that a Mammal possessing a fore-limb which, from any cause whatever, has become in any considerable degree emancipated from the function of mere quadrupedal progression will also possess a clavicle of fairly complete development, no matter what the systematic zoological position of the Mammal may be. Emancipation of the fore-limb has preserved the clavicle, inherited in the general vertebrate make-up of the first mammalian type, and has insured its survival in a simple yet very perfect form in Man. The arboreal habit, as the great factor in preserving and increasing the original mobility of the fore-limb, has also been the great factor in preserving in the human shoulder girdle a well-developed collar-bone. CHAPTER VI THE MUSCLES OF THE FOKE-LIMB TURNING from the skeletal features of the fore-limb to the arrangement of its muscles, we again meet a like condition of extremely primitive characters in the typical Primate and in Man. Although most authorities are agreed as to the general primitive condition of the human arm and hand — and it is difficult for an osteologist to find anything other than a very primitive arrangement in the general plan of the bones — yet the myologist has as a rule looked upon human musculature from rather a different standpoint. This is not the place to make detailed criticisms of the methods employed in com- parative myology; but one might say that if the human fore-limb muscles are compared with those of a typical quadrupedal Mammal, then certain great changes will be found. It is easy to assume that since Man is a " high " form, and the horse, for instance, is a " low " one, then the fore-limb muscles of Man have advanced considerably in evolution. This type of reasoning permeates the study of comparative myology, and its fallacy needs no exposing since it is self-evident. If there is any truth in the present thesis, that the human stock has never been quadrupedal, never possessed four equally supporting limbs, then it is likely that the arrange- ment of muscles found in the human limb will have its near counterpart in some very primitive Vertebrate. It is likely that the muscles and the bones will follow exactly the same story. I think it is perfectly obvious that they do. Far from seeing any signs that the deriva- 32 THE MUSCLES OF THE FORE-LIMB 33 tion of the muscular plan of the human arm is from that seen in any lower quadrupedal form, it seems quite obvious that the truly quadrupedal pronograde type is derived from a primitive arrangement such as is retained in Man. We have an excellent account of a very generalized vertebrate type of musculature in the description given by Humphry of Cryptobranchus japonicus, and to the stage of evolution of the limb musculature as seen in this Amphibian we shall have to make frequent reference. The group of muscles which especially interests us here is that which produces the rotatory movements of the second segment of the limb, and in order to limit the purely anatomical details we will follow the history of those rotators which produce the movement of pronation — i.e., turn the back of the hand upwards. This group is of primary importance, since it produces that mobility of the second segment which, as we have seen, is incom- patible with true quadrupedal stability. The pronators compose a primitive group of muscles which shows the effects of alteration of function in a very definite manner ; the condition of the members of the group is easily determined in different animal types, and their disposi- tion may therefore be taken as a handy index of the degree to which mobility has been sacrificed to stability in the forearm. In Cryptobranchus this muscle group is well developed; but, as is the case with all the muscle groups of this very generalized animal, it is not so defi- nitely subdivided into its component elements as it is in higher forms (see Fig. 11). The pronators of this Amphibian consist of a super- ficial part, which arises from the ulnar condyle of the humerus in common with the M. flexor carpi radialis, but, dissociating itself from the common mass, is inserted into the lateral margin of the radius. Beneath this portion is a deeper set of fibres, which at its insertion to the radius becomes continuous with another sheet which 3 34 ARBOREAL MAN arises from the ulna. This sheet, which passes from the ulna to the radius, is oblique in direction -above, but more transverse nearer to the wrist, where it becomes continuous with another set of fibres, which, arising from the ulna, passes to the radial side of the wrist and hand. — P.R.T. (1) SL.__ P.R.T.<2) —P.R.T. (2) -P.Q. -P.M. FIG. 11. FIG. 12. FIG. 11.— DIAGRAMMATIC FIGURE OF THE PRONATOR GROUP OF MUSCLES IN Cryptobranchus. P.R.T. (1), Mammalian superficial head of pronator radii teres. P.R.T. (2), Deep Mammalian head of same muscle. P.Q.> Pronator quadratus. P.M., Pronator manus. FIG. 12.— DIAGRAM OF THE PRONATOR MUSCLES IN MAN. P.R.T. (1), Superficial, humeral, head of pronator radii teres. P.R.T. (2), Deep, ulnar, head of same muscle. P.Q., Pro- nator quadratus. S.L., Supinator longus. S.B., Supinator brevis. There is therefore in this generalized animal a more or less continuous pronator sheet, the proximal part of which is superficial, and passes from humerus to radius, where it blends with an intermediate part. This second part is deeper, and passes from ulna to radius, and, in its turn, blends with a distal part which passes from the ulna to the radial side of the third segment of the limb. From this unspecialized condition, advance takes place, THE MUSCLES OF THE FORE-LIMB 35 as is the general rule, by the segmentation of muscular sheets into separate muscles; and a comparison may be made directly between this simple type and the more specialized condition seen in some other animals. The superficial portion of the proximal mass becomes the humeral head of the M. pronator radii teres. The deep portion of this mass, which is blended with the inter- mediate sheet, becomes the M. pronator intermedius, or ulnar head of the M. pronator radii teres. The distal mass, or M. pronator manus, looses its insertion to the third segment in many forms, and, united with the lower portion of the intermediate sheet, it constitutes the M. pronator quadratus. With the differentiation of the muscular sheets of Cryptobranchus there is therefore afforded a myological basis for (1) a bicipital M. pronator radii teres, and (2) a definite M. pronator quadratus, which may, or may not, possess extensions downwards to the carpus. This is the condition found in many unspecialized Reptiles and Amphibians, as well as in the most primitive Mammals, and it may be regarded as the simplest type of resolution of the primitive muscle sheets. But if this condition of the pronator group may be regarded as primitive, it is obviously one that is very readily departed from at the dictates of functional demands for the stability of the limb, and one that has a very limited representation among the existing mammalian types. To gain an insight into the possible modifications of this muscle group it will be best to take each muscle separately; and the most simple comparison may be made in the apparently illogical order of taking the human condition first. The M. pronator radii teres is a typical bicipital muscle in Man. The superficial, and larger, portion arises from the medial aspect of the lower end of the humerus; the deeper, and smaller, portion is derived by a tendon from 36 ARBOREAL MAN the coronoid process of the ulna (see Figs. 13 and 14). Between these two heads of origin the median nerve P.R.T.d) — - P.R.T.(2) S.B, P.R.T. P.Q. FIG. 13.— PRONATOR MUSCLES OF MAN. P.R.T. (1), Site of origin of superficial head, and P.R.T. (2), of the deep head of the pronator radii teres, the insertion of which is at P.R.T. P.Q., Pronator quadratus. S.B., Supi- nator brevis. passes into the forearm, thereby rendering the two portions quite distinct. The deeper (ulnar) part is THE MUSCLES OF THE FORE-LIMB 37 variable in the degree of its development in Man; at times it constitutes but a small portion of the whole muscle, and occasionally it is entirely absent. In all --P.R.T. FIG. 14. — THE INSERTION OP THE BICIPITAL PRONATOR RADII TERES OF MAN (P.R.T.). S.B., Supinator brevis. the Anthropoids this variability of the ulnar part is displayed, with an increasing tendency to vary in the direction of partial or complete absence. In the Orang-utan the condition is practically identical with that seen in Man. In the Chimpanzee, Hepburn 38 ARBOREAL MAN described the ulnar head as normally present ; but Keith has shown that it is absent in as many as 10 per cent, of all examples dissected. Absence of the ulnar head is more usual in the Gorilla; Hepburn regarded complete absence as normal, but Keith has determined that it was present, in some degree, in about 40 per cent, of all individuals. In none of the Monkeys is an ulnar head present under normal conditions, and the Lemurs are alike in this respect (see Fig. 15). The ulnar head is absent in all other orders of Eutherian Mammals, with the exception of at any rate some of -P.R/T J*, P'RT-(1) -P.R.T.(2) -P.Q. •-P.Q. FIG. 15. FIG. 15. — DIAGRAM OF THE PRONATOR MUSCLES IN TYPICAL PRIMATES. Lettering as before. FIG. 16.— DIAGRAM OF THE PRONATOR MUSCLES IN A TREE SHREW (Tupaia ferruginea). Lettering as in other diagrams. the Insectivora. In the Tree Shrews (e.g., Tupaia ferruginea) there is (despite Kloster's assertion to the contrary) a portion of the muscle deep to the median nerve, and this portion arises from the upper extremity of the ulna and from the internal collateral ligament THE MUSCLES OP THE FORE-LIMB 39 of the elbow-joint (Figs. 16 and 17). In an Oriental Pygmy Shrew (Crocidura bottigi), again, the muscle is in FIG. 17. — THE PRONATOR QUADRATUS AND INSERTION OF PRONATOR RADII TERES IN Tupaia ferruginea. its bicipital form (Fig. 18). In all the Metatherian Mammals the only origin of the M. pronator radii teres is from the humerus, the nlnar head being absent. In FIG. 18.— THE PRONATOR RADII TERES AND PRONATOR QUADRATUS IN A CROCIDURINE SHREW. the lowly Monotremes the human deep head has been asserted to be present, but it cannot be regarded as a normal component of the muscle.* Among the Reptilia * At the time of delivering the' lecture I relied upon the latest paper published upon the subject — that by Gordon Taylor and Victor Bonney (Jour. Anat. and Phys., vol. 40, p. 34) — which definitely asserted the presence of the ulnar head in Ornithorhyn- chus and in Echidna. Since that time I have dissected the fore- limbs of two examples of Ornithorhynchus and one Echidna (kindly placed at my disposal by Dr. W. C. McKenzie), and I find no trace of an ulnar head in any of these specimens, the condition agreeing with that described by Rud. Kloster (" Anato- mische Hefte," 1901, p. 671). 40 ARBOREAL MAN the same condition is found; an ulnar head constitutes a bulky portion of the muscle in the Chelonia (e.g., Testudo) and in the Lacertilia (e.g., Varanus). Among the general- ized Amphibia, Cryptobranchus shows the same thing in the ill-differentiated form we have noted previously. The story of the M. pronator quadratus is equally striking. In Man an interosseous membrane unites the two bones of the forearm, and although in this membrane there is, as is usual in such membranes, a crossed arrange- ment of its fibres, nevertheless the great bulk of the strands run from the radius down to the ulna. On a plane altogether anterior to this membrane the muscle bundles of the M. pronator quadratus run on the whole in an opposed direction, from ulna down to radius. It is important to notice that behind the M. pronator quad- ratus the interosseous membrane is quite uninterrupted; the muscle does not replace the membrane, but lies in front of it. This condition is typical of all the Primates. It is found in some of the more mobile-limbed members of other Eutherian orders. It is present in Tupaia and in Crocidura, in typically human guise; and it is present again in generalized Reptiles and in Amphibia. Its con- dition in Cxyptobranchus has previously been mentioned. A true M. pronator quadratus is not present in those thoroughly quadrupedal animals in which the rotation of the two bones of the second segment is lost. The true M. pronator quadratus is not to be confused with the M. radio-ulnaris, which is a purely interosseous muscle, homologue of the M. tibio-fibularis of the leg, and is situated on a plane posterior to the fibres of the distinct M. pronator quadratus. The facts of the occurrence of these muscles in the Vertebrate series must be admitted to be very curious, since the typically human condition is such a rare mam- malian feature, and yet is one so closely matched among the generalized Amphibia and Reptilia. The facts may THE MUSCLES OF THE FORE-LIMB 41 be interpreted in two ways — the human condition may be a new and gradual development from the stage seen in the typical lower Eutherian Mammals, or it may be a retention of an extremely primitive and generalized vertebrate type of musculature. Most authorities upon comparative anatomy appear to regard the ulnar head of the M. pronator radii teres as a new development in the Anthropoids — a development which becomes most fully established and most fully perfected in Man. This development is, by many, regarded as a reversion. This point of view was taken by Gordon Taylor and Victor Bonney, and they have concluded regarding this muscle: " It may be objected that it appears rather strange that in Man, a Mammal most highly specialized, and the most highly evolved, the apparently older stage in evolution of the muscle persists. But we must remember that in him movement between the bones of the forearm has reappeared in an extreme degree." Were the human condition of this muscle to be an isolated phenomenon, perhaps such an attitude might be justified; but when the primitive type of every bone and joint of the human fore-limb is taken into account, we must hesitate before we name these things as " reappearances " in Man, That the human ulnar head of the M. pronator radii teres is a retention of a primitive type appears to me to be a more reasonable view when all the facts of the anatomy of the fore-limb are taken into consideration. I therefore regard this muscle of Man as being more akin to the ancestral type than anything seen in the rest of the living members of the Primates. As for the human M. pronator quadratus, it is usually regarded as being only a partial survival of a primitively extensive interosseous muscle, which is best developed in quadrupedal forms. We have previously pointed out that the interosseous muscle (M. radio-ulnaris) is on a plane which is deep to that occupied by the true M. pronator quadratus, and the nerve-supply points also to 42 ARBOREAL MAN their entire morphological separation. I do not think the facts justify us in regarding the human M. pronator quadratus as a degenerated portion of any muscle present in quadrupedal Mammals, but I imagine that this muscle, which produces rotation of the fore-limb bones, is absent in them, and is replaced by a muscle which braces the immobile bones firmly together. The human M. pronator quadratus finds its parallel in the same forms as does the deep head of the M. pronator radii teres, and I imagine that their story is the same, and that their retention is due to the same primitive nature of the forearm in these types. It is probable that when all power of rotation of the forearm bones is lost, the ulnar head of the M. pronator radii teres, being useless under the circumstances, shifts its origin to the humerus, and joining into the superficial mass, acts with it as a flexor of the elbow-joint. Regarded in this way, and solely from this point of view, the forearm of Man is more primitive than that of any living Primate except the Orang-utan; but it finds its match in the generalized Insectivora, in the Proto- • theria (in part), and in the unspecialized Reptiles and Amphibians, and this is a story very like that told by the bones themselves. CHAPTER VII THE TORE-LIMB: SUMMARY IT would be a difficult matter to find the author who, writing of the human forearm and the human hand, has not seen in them the very highest and most perfect development of the fore -limb found anywhere in the animal kingdom. It has long been customary to lavish praise upon this culmination of human perfections, or climax of evolutionary advances, as writers of different periods have judged it. The divine plan was most surely to be seen in the human hand, that most wonderful of specially designed members. " The Construction of the Hand of Man " was especially chosen by the trustees of the Earl of Bridgwater as a subject in the expounding of which an apt writer could find outlet for almost in- exhaustible eulogies, and for countless examples of perfection of design. It is, perhaps, to be doubted if Sir Charles Bell, in his completed Bridgwater Treatise, took full advantage of the wealth of material at his disposal, or of the insatiable popular appetite for authori- tative statements upon the human perfections. Bell was so thorough an anatomist that it was impossible for him to restrain his admiration for the lion's paw and the horse's hoof — even the anatomical conditions of the despised sloth find in him an admirer ; but although they are extremely elegant, his observations upon the human hand are not perhaps coloured with an enthusiasm so real as that which the noble patron himself entertained. " Were we to limit our inquiry to the bones of the arm and hand of Man, no doubt we should soon discover their 43 44 ARBOREAL MAN provisions for easy, varied, and powerful action, and conclude that nothing could be more perfectly suited to their purposes. But we must extend our views to com- prehend a great deal more— a greater design." This, and many other similar passages, shows Bell's attitude in the work he did for his Bridgwater Treatise, and it is to be regretted that many lesser writers, who were un- trammelled by the confines imposed by so narrowing a circumstance, did not follow Bell in this width of outlook. Those modern authors who have seen so much in the so-called " attainment of the erect position " (Munro) have been especially lavish in their praise of the human hand as a mere anatomical structure. Dr. Munro in his Presidential Address at the British Association in 1893 permitted himself the expression that the human hand is " the most complete and perfect mechanical organ Nature has yet produced." Such a statement on the part of an anatomist can only be attributed to enthusiasm, and to a failure to differentiate between the very primitive anatomical condition of the hand and the perfection of this simple mechanism when linked to a human brain. Even John Goodsir was more moderate, for he claimed no more than that " the human hand is the only perfect or complete hand." The hand with its multitude of uses, its better suiting to human purposes than such a thing as a hoof or a paw, its apparent complexity and perfection of movement, was a thing so easily turned to as affording evidence of design — and by design was meant a special and divine planning. In 1833 almost any anatomist in the United Kingdom could have done the Bridgwater Treatise more to its purpose than did Sir Charles Bell. As things were, and with the height of apparent incongruity, the book he wrote in 1833 makes a very suitable introduction to the work of Darwin twenty-six years later. After 1859 the forearm and hand, in common with every other feature of the human body, came to be THE FORE-LIMB: SUMMARY 45 regarded, not as a wonderful and specially designed structure, but as the perfected products of accumulated ages of evolution — the last thing in animal development and specialization. It is no overstatement of the case to say that Man was regarded by many as the last thing made, the culmination of evolution, and for some op- ponents of the new teaching and for some of its sup- porters he was the most modern animal. The orthodox chronology was accepted, the " highest " form was the last form made, but instead of being the latest creation, he was the latest evolution. Huxley soon exposed the folly of this notion when it was definitely brought forward by an opponent. But though the statement of the idea as expressed by Mr. Gladstone may have been very crude, and its demolition easy by such powers of argument as were Huxley's, still, in more subtle guise the same idea becomes presented under many forms even to-day, and this not by any means necessarily from opponents of evolution ; in such forms its refutation is not always easy. In even the most rigid and strictly scientific investigations in comparative anatomy this tendency is at times mani- fested. The human type of joint, or nerve, or muscle, or what not is so often assumed to be the last perfected — the culminating type. There is a vague idea, which insinuates itself in many ways, that the human type of structure must be derived from, and have passed through, stages seen in a series of " lower " animals. A foolish argument may be permitted in dealing with a folly. Were a horse capable of writing works on comparative anatomy, he would probably, and with far more justice, regard his race as being the last effort in evolutionary chronology, and he would, and again with far more justice, derive his highly specialized limbs from those of some such primitive form as Man. A Bridg water Treatise upon " The Construction of the Hoof of the Horse," followed by a " Descent of the Horse " by a member of the same species, would be a 46 ARBOREAL MAN most healthy tonic for the human comparative anatomist as well as for the human philosopher ; in these two hypo- thetical works there is no doubt that the human fore- limb would suffer badly. Far from being regarded as the acme of evolutionary processes, it would be judged as an extraordinary survival of a very primitive feature far into the mammalian series, and more would be written upon its striking similarity to the corresponding member in the salamander and the tortoise than of its adaptation to the multitude of human functions. This is a silly argument, and no comparative anatomist not resident in the kingdom of the Houyhnhnms would enter into discussion with a quadruped that wrote a thesis showing that the human fore-limb was very like that of a water- newt. I have, however, brought the subject forward in this way of set purpose, for as unbiassed judges of our- selves we are to say definitely one way or the other: Is the arrangement of bones and muscles we have seen in the human arm a gradually elaborated evolutionary perfection, or is it merely the retention of a condition ; o primitive that it is matched only among its immediate kin, and by types situated in the vertebrate stock right at the point of mammalian divergence ? In anatomical terms we may say : Have we lost a primitive arrangement of bones and muscles, and then regained them, in evolu- tion, upon exactly the same lines, or have we simply retained them comparatively unaltered from the dawn of mammalian specialization ? We must not overlook in this the gravity of the second alternative, for it carries with it the assumption that the human stock began to be differentiated in that dawn period when the Mammals themselves were evolved from some possible Theromorph ancestor. With all the evidence that is available I cannot see how it is possible to avoid this second conclusion. In bones, and in muscles, the human fore-limb is far more like that of a tortoise than it is like that of a horse or a dog. This is no fanciful way of stating the case, THE FORE-LIMB: SUMMARY 47 nor is it going one whit farther than the ordinarily gross facts of demonstrable anatomy warrant. Could we imagine an isolated human arm to be the only relic extant of the human race, and were this arm to be dis- sected by some superanatomist, he would find the arrange- ment of its skeletal and muscular elements matched very nearly in the Giant Apes and Old- World Monkeys, in some of the lowest Lemurs, and some primitive In- sectivora, as well as in the more unspecialized Reptiles and some Amphibians ; but he would search in vain for its like among the remaining mammalian groups. CHAPTER VIII THE FATE OF THE HIND-LIMBS WE have hurriedly reviewed the process by which a primitive Mammal with four undifferentiated and mobile limbs achieved the emancipation of its fore -limb by its -climbing activities. It is now necessary to make an attempt to follow the changes which take place in the hind-limb under the same circumstances. This phase is rather more complex in the hind-limb, and though the •changes produced are not, perhaps, so great, their sequence has been more liable to interruption. The most primitive type of hind-limb we may imagine is an exact counter- part of the picture we have drawn of the fore-limb. It corresponds segment for segment, and joint for joint, with those described in the fore-limb. It has all the same possibilities; its fate depends in great measure upon the emancipation of the fore-limb. We have pictured the animal in its initial stages of tree-climbing as reaching out, with its fore-limb, to obtain new holds. It is during this oft-repeated interval that the fate of the hind-limb is determined, for, during this interval, it becomes the supporting limb upon which the body weight is thrown. Here is therefore the dawn of the differentiation in function of fore and hind limb ; the fore-limb is reaching ahead for a new hold, the hind-limb is temporarily supporting the body during the act. It must be noted, however, that this supporting is of a very definite kind, and is not by any means of the same nature as that which is brought about in those animals which, being purely terrestrial, have become typically quadrupedal. In 43 THE FATE OF THE HIND-LIMBS 49 arboreal life, the hind-limb never becomes a mere stable prop ; it becomes the principal support of the body weight, but it is a support which is bearing a body undergoing endless changes of poise. Moreover, it is discharging this function among the branches of a tree; the foot is not resting on the ground, it is placed in apposition with a branch. The sole of the foot becomes applied to the branch of a tree, in the same manner as does the palm of the hand. The mobility of the second segment of the lower limb becomes limited and restricted to definite lines, but it does not become lost; the simple condition of the foot becomes retained even if not so completely as in the fore-limb. The power of grasp of the foot is developed, though not to the degree of perfection which is seen in the hand. We may imagine the evolutionary story to have been carried out somewhat on these lines. The animal pauses in its attempts to climb, it reaches for a new hold with its hands, and so trusts to its legs for its support. Later, the power to grasp becomes more perfectly developed in the hand, and when it has secured a new hold it can grasp and suspend the body weight while the foot reaches farther ahead for a new foothold; a degree of mobility of the second segment of the leg is thus retained, and a degree of development of grasp with the foot is thus developed. From the attain- ment of this stage, two divergent developments are possible. The hind-leg may develop a degree of mobility and of grasp equal, or almost equal, to that of the hand, a condition which fits the animal for the time-honoured distinction as quadrumanous or four-handed. The foot may become,, equally with the hand, a grasping and suspending organ; or the hand and forearm may be specialized as the mobile grasping-suspending organ, and the leg and foot as the supporting — still somewhat mobile and somewhat grasping — organ. It is the grasping- supporting and not the grasping-suspending leg that has, from this common point of divergence, led to better things. 50 ARBOREAL MAN The one is characteristic of the higher, and the other of the lower, living members of the Primates. The most typically arboreal of the Lemurs know but little dis- tinction of hand and foot; both are equally grasping- suspending organs, and as a consequence it matters little to the animal if it hangs or climbs head upwards or head downwards. Nycticebus tardigradus positively seems to y" prefer an inverted position, and I have noticed that, when perfect freedom of action is permitted, the animal nearly always suspends itself by its feet and hangs head downwards whilst it eats. When going to rest in the daytime, it will climb to the top of its cage, and then, turning round, go to sleep upside down like a bat. In resuming its activity towards evening, it releases the grasp of its hands, and carries out a careful examination of everything within its reach before it relaxes the grasp of its feet. Nycticebus will also grasp food and other objects with its foot, but shows nevertheless a decided preference for using its hand for this purpose. This specialization of the foot as a grasping organ has been carried still further in the New- World monkeys, and it has conferred upon that group the title Pedimana, or foot-handed, in the classification of some former zoologists. In the American monkeys, the development of the prehensile tail and specialization of the grasping foot at the expense of the grasping hand has played a very important part, and to this question we will return later. The higher Primates of the Old World, on the other hand, have differentiated the functions of the hind and fore limbs very thoroughly. They suspend themselves only by the fore-limbs, and use their hind-limbs solely for passive, but still grasping, support; they do not hang or climb head downwards. • There is a homely, but not therefore necessarily unimportant, difference manifested in the arboreal activity of these two extremes in Primate life. A Lemur climbs up among the branches head first; Nycticebus ascends with extraordinary deliberation, THE FATE OF THE HIND-LIMBS 51 climbing hand over hand and testing every new hold that it obtains before finally trusting its weight to it. When it has reached the limit of its ascent, it commonly turns round, and, hanging by its feet, eats its meal or performs its toilet head downwards. It is from such a position that it descends, and its descent is carried out in exactly the same manner as its ascent, but naturally in a reversed position — it crawls and climbs down head forwards. All this is very easily watched in Nycticebus, because its actions are so deliberately leisured and orderly, but the same head forward descent is typical of all the Lemurs I have had the opportunity of watching. The New-World monkeys do the same thing, but in them the use of the prehensile tails of some species rather complicates the process of climbing down head foremost. Now, it is an observation easily made wherever a higher Old-World monkey is to be seen, that although it climbs up a tree, it walks down again hind end foremost. Most monkeys come down a tree just as a man does, bearing the weight of the body by the suspending hand grasp and by the supporting foothold. As a man descends a ladder, so a higher monkey descends a tree. We may sum up this process by saying that the lower Primates climp up trees and climb down again, but the higher Primates climb up and then walk down. Now the difference shown in these two simple cases is in reality a very great one. The arboreal habit conferred its benefits by emancipating the fore-limb from the duties of support and progression, and, by differentiating its functions from that of the hind-limb, it saved the animal from becoming quadrupedal. In differentiating the functions of the two sets of limbs, the animal gains a great deal. Some animals, one might almost say, have gone too far in adapting themselves to the arboreal habit. An animal, saved by the arboreal habit from becoming quadrupedal, does not gain the maximum of the benefits derivable from its new mode of life, if it is saved from 52 ARBOREAL MAN this fate only to become quadrumanous. Four feet do not lead far in the struggle for mammalian supremacy, four hands do not lead a great deal farther. It was the differentiation into two hands and two feet that provided the great strength of the stock from which Man arose. The active specialization of the fore-limb did much, but it could not do all, without the accompanying passive specialization of the hind-limb. Mere ability in climbing, which usurped the power of any real ability to walk, was but a poor accomplishment, for to complete the whole story of evolution the animal which climbed up the tree had still to walk down — and the Old- World apes still show in caricature how this was done. CHAPTER IX THE SKELETON OF THE HIND-LIMB WE have seen that the human arm and hand exhibit a strikingly primitive anatomical picture, and that, on the whole, the resemblance of these parts of Man to the same parts of the rest of the Primates is very great. We have arrived at this conclusion despite the rather common assumption that in the hand of Man there is evinced the very highest human specialization and refinement. Compared with the fore-limb, the hind-limb is apt to be ranked as a rather primitive and unspecialized thing in Man. This assumption, again, is contrary to all the facts, for if we regard the hind-limb as presenting a more primitive condition in certain Primates (and this is a well- justified point of view), we must admit a very definite alteration from the primitive arrangement in the leg and foot of Man. The human hind-limb has specialized considerably from the condition seen in the arboreal Monkeys, and the arboreal hind-limb is, as we shall see, far nearer to the primitive Vertebrate type. Between the anatomical condition of the hind-limb of the Anthropoids and that seen in Man there is apparently a somewhat sudden break in the story of the evolution of the leg. But the changes which ultimately become so characteristic of Man are already at work in the Gibbons, the Orang-utan, the Chimpanzee, and especially in the Gorilla. They are already apparent in some of the Old- World monkeys. There will be no need to discuss at all fully the anatomi- cal details of the primitive hind-limb, since the likeness to the fore-limb, which we have already touched on, is 53 54 ARBOREAL MAN very great. There is a ventral meeting of the elements of the pelvic girdle at the pubic symphysis. This meeting of the ventral parts of the pelvic girdle subserves the functional role played by the clavicle in the anterior extremity, and this bone is not represented morpho- logically in the skeleton of the posterior extremity. The hip- joint obviously corresponds to the shoulder. The femur with its muscles recapitulates the features we have noted in the humerus, the knee-joint corresponds to the elbow. The tibia and fibula, free to move on the femur at the knee-joint, and free to move upon each other, are the homologues of the radius and ulna (see Fig. 19). The ideal tarsus consists of nine bones: tibiale, intermedium and fibulare constituting the first row, tarsalia I.-V. the second, and an os central e is included between the two rows, this condition obviously reproducing that we have already noted in the carpus. Five metacarpals and five digits with their appropriate muscles complete the archi- tecture of the foot. The digits are composed (as in the hand) of three separate phalanges, and all the digits are well developed, with the middle one as the longest member of the series. These are the features which we may presume to be present in the primitive hind-limb, and they will become modified, now in this direction and now in that, as func- tion demands it. There is a strong presumption that the hind-limb will depart more early than the fore-limb from this primitive condition, and this presumption is strongly borne out by the facts. From what we have seen of the effects of even minimal demands for a supporting function in the case of the fore-limb, we shall not expect to find a thoroughly primitive hind-limb at all far up in the land-living verte- brate stock. The hind-limb was called on, in the land- living Vertebrates, at the very dawn of mammalian specialization, as a support for the body weight. Sta- bility became substituted at the outset of the story for THE SKELETON OF THE HIND-LIMB 55 mobility. Environmental conditions could not combine to free the hind-limb of its duty of supporting the body weight and yet preserve it in full functional activity; the arboreal habit did this for the fore-limb, but there was no life circumstance that could do the same thing for the hind-limb. An aerial life might, at first sight, FIG. 19. — DIAGRAMMATIC COMPARISON OP THE SKELETAL ELEMENTS OF (A) HIND AND (B) FORE LIMB. seem to fulfil the necessary conditions, and flight might seem to afford an escape fromjthe supporting servitude of the hind-limb. Flying Mammals have achieved many interesting modifications in hind-limb structure, but they have not successfully emancipated a hind-limb to give it other and more highly educational functions. They have avoided making it a mere prop only to convert it into a suspending hook. The hind-limb of the Bats is worthy 56 ARBOREAL MAN . of attention for its very special adaptations ; but it is not a member destined to carry its owner far in the race for mammalian supremacy. Only a purely aquatic life could produce an animal in which the hind-limb took no part whatever in the support of the body weight, and in the thoroughly aquatic forms (Sirenia and Cetacea) the hind-limb, deprived of this function, becomes a mere rudiment. Consequently, even in the most primitive of the prototherian Mammals, we find that the ideal condition is somewhat widely de- parted from. In the Monotremes the fibula is large, and from its proximal end a process rises above the point of articulation with the tibia, and both tibia and fibula are separated in their whole length ; both bones of the second segment are preserved, and some degree of mobility between them still survives the demand for stability. The mobility of tibia and fibula upon each other is, how- ever, best retained in the arboreal Metatheria, where, especially in Phascolarctus and some of the Phalangers, the power of rotation rivals that displayed between the radius and ulna. In the arboreal Sloths, again, the fibula is a large and well-formed bone which articulates with the tibia at its two extremities. In the Tree Shrews ( Tu- paiadce) the fibula is well developed and entirely sep- arated from the tibia, whereas in many terrestrial Insec- tivora it has become reduced and fused to its neighbour. In the Primate stock good development* complete separation, and even slight mobility of the fibula upon the tibia, are maintained as a part of the arboreal adap- tation. In all other mammalian orders the fibula tends to undergo the reduction we have noted in the ulna of the fore-limbs of quadrupedal animals; all movement between it and the tibia is lost early, and the fibula be- comes a rudiment finally blended into the structure of the dominant tibia. No Mammal retains the ideal primitive tarsus, but the same may be said of existing Reptiles and even of their THE SKELETON OF THE HIND-LIMB 57 fossil representatives. The tibiale and intermedium are fused to form the astragalus, while the fibulare remains large and distinct as the calcaneum, thus reducing the first row to two bones. The centrale remains as the large scajghoid; tarsalia I., II., and III. persist as distinct elements, the inner, middle and external cuneiform bones ; while tarsalia IV. and V. fuse into the cuboid. This con- stitutes the minimal mammalian reduction (and indeed the minimal reduction of existing Reptiles), and as such it is typical of the Primates (see Fig. 20). It is also seen in the Insectivora and in some other orders, but it is FIG. 20. — SKELETON OF THE HUMAN FOOT, TO SHOW THE FATE OF THE PRIMITIVE ELEMENTS OF THE TARSUS. carried farther by other fusions and reductions in most highly specialized quadrupedal Mammals. The five primitive digits remain in their elemental development and relative proportions in the Primates, as well as in the Insectivora and some other orders, and, like the thumb, the big to^ has undergone a reduction by the loss of one element. In most of the members of the Primate stock the primitive formula of the digits is retained, and the third or middle toe outstrips its neigh- bours as does the middle finger. It may therefore be claimed for the typical Primate hind-limb that almost as far as original simplicity is retained in the Mammals it is here present in all the skeletal elements. In mobility of the second segment only is the Primate simplicity surpassed by the Mono- tremes and by the arboreal Metatheria. CHAPTER X THE MUSCLES OF THE HIND-LIMB IN the hind-limb we may make a brief review of those muscles which are the homologues of the rotators, the history of which we have followed in the fore-limb. The power of rotation of the second segment of the hind-limb is, as we have seen, very readily lost when any supporting function is demanded of the limb. This demand for support is made at the outset of terrestrial life, and, as a consequence, the rotator muscles of tibia and fibula undergo a change very early in the vertebrate series. In Cryptobranchus japonicus there is a muscle which arises from the upper and outer aspect of the fibula, and is inserted to the inner border of the tibia at a lower level. This muscle rotates the tibia around the fibula; it corresponds to the ulnar portion of the M. pronator radii teres of the arm, and it is named M. pronator tibiae. Superficial to this is a longer muscle, which, arising from the outer condyle of the femur, passes to the inner side of the foot. This muscle is the M. pronator pedis, and though the comparison cannot be maintained for all its connections, it contains the element homologous with the humeral portion of the M. pronator radii teres. In the hind-limb there is perhaps no true homologue of the whole of the M. pronator quadratus of human anatomy, but the M. accessorius is, in all probability, derived from an element equivalent to its lowest carpal fibres. The interosseous M. tibio-fibularis is present upon a deeper plane. In Varanus, as an example of a reptilian form whose 58 THE MUSCLES OF THE HIND-LIMB 59 limbs have taken on some part of the bodily support, the condition is as yet unchanged, so far as the fibular origin of the M. pronator tibiae is concerned, and this muscle is found as (but perhaps only as part of) the M. popliteus of the higher Vertebrates. The superficial ^portion pos- sesses practically no power of rotation, and the move- ment between the two bones is becoming somewhat more limited. Among the Mammals, the Monotremes and some of the less specialized Marsupials still possess the M. popliteus, which is the exact homologue of the deep, or ulnar, part of the M. pronator radii teres, for it arises from the upper end of the fibula, and is inserted into the tibia, upon which bone it produces some degree of rota- tion. Among some of the Insectivora, the M. popliteus is in a half-way stage, for it arises from the upper end of the fibula and from the capsule of the knee-joint. This is the case in some of the Shrews, and apparently also in Chrysochloris, the Golden Moles (Dobson). In the common Hedgehog (Erinaceus), the muscle has migrated still farther towards the femur, but it still arises from the capsule of the joint as well as from the femoral condyle. In some of the Lemurs, the M. popliteus still retains connection with the fibula through the intervention of a tendon and a sesamoid bone, just as it does in some Lizards; but in all other Primates the main origin is entirely from the femur, with occasional slight excursions to the ligaments of the joint. A small, deeper portion, the M. peroneo-tibialis, however, retains connection with the fibula, but this muscular slip is derived, in all probability, from the deeper interosseous muscle of the lower Verte- brates. In Man the popliteus muscle arises entirely from the femur, and even the peroneo-tibialis is only present in one out of some seven subjects, according to Gruber (see Fig. 21). The story of this muscle group appears to be fairly clear from the functional point of view. So long as the old mobility was retained, the rotator muscle passed from bone to bone across the second 60 ARBOREAL MAN segment ; but with the gradual loss of this mobility, and its substitution by stability, the muscle shifted its origin as its function changed, and, ascending via the capsule of the knee-joint, it joined the external condyle of the FIG. 21. — THE BACK OP THE HUMAN KNEE-JOINT, TO SHOW THE POPLITEUS MUSCLE. femur. It then exchanged its rotating function for that of flexion of the knee-joint. This is a mere repetition of the story of the ulnar head of the M. pronator radii teres in those quadrupedal animals in which the fore-limb has suffered changes identical with those in the hind-limb THE MUSCLES OF THE HIND-LIMB 61 The superficial portion of the M. pronator radii teres is represented in the leg by a muscle which has long since lost all power of rotation, and in Man is almost certainly merged with the lateral head of the calf muscle named M. gastrocnemius. It is clear, therefore, that these muscle groups of the fore and hind limbs have undergone very dissimilar changes in Man. We have seen how strangely primitive is the retention of the condition of the arm ; but it would seem that, in the leg, the primitive condition was departed from, and that some degree of support was demanded from the leg at an early stage in human evolution. With a simple arrangement of anatomical parts, a slight shifting of muscular origins has turned a perfectly mobile second segment into a supporting segment, constructed upon very simple lines. That these changes are those pro- duced by the demands of support from the hind-limb in tree -climbing seems obvious, since they are present in all arboreal Primates, and as such we may imagine they have been long established in the ancestry of Man. CHAPTER XI OTHER AEBOREAL ADAPTATIONS OF THE HIND-LIMB BESIDES the features which we have already noted in the arboreal hind-limb there are others of equal, or even greater, importance in the story of the evolution of Man as an arboreal animal. These other changes can only be referred to in outline, since the details of anatomical arrangements connected with them are legion. In pic- turing the early stages of the development of climbing, it was noted how the animal, supporting its body weight temporarily on its hind-limbs, reached out ahead for a new hold for its hands. This was the interval which marked the dawn of specialization of the functions of fore and hind limbs, and in which stability was demanded in some measure from the hind-limb. But in this interval another, and a very important, thing is happening, for as the animal reaches ahead, its body axis is altered, and the support of the hind-limbs is called upon in a very special manner. In this interval of climbing up, the body axis approaches the vertical, and the animal be- comes in this way a temporary orthograde. There are degrees in this development of an orthograde habit, even if it be only a temporary phase, as in the primitive arboreal enterprise we are picturing. An animal may carry its body axis upright as a temporary expedient or as a life habit, while still retaining its thigh at right angles to its trunk; or it may hold its trunk erect upon an extended thigh. There are many animals which can maintain the trunk 62 ARBOREAL ADAPTATIONS OF HIND-LIMB 6^ in a temporary position of uprightness upon a flexed thigh. A dog sitting up to beg, a squirrel eating its nut, or a bear awaiting its bun, are examples of this degree of uprightness. There are many animals which adopt this posture as a life habit, the Kangaroo (Macropus) and the Jerboa (Dipus) are good examples of Mammals which are habitually orthograde as far as their trunk axis is concerned, but in which the thigh is normally flexed so as to be nearly at right angles with the trunk. But the posture which is temporarily assumed by the primitive tree-climber is very different from this, for in the interval which we are picturing its body axis is tending to become carried upright upon a thigh which is more or less ex- tended as the trunk is raised towards the grasping hands, It is tree-climbing which makes this posture a possibility, and even its temporary adoption marks a great step in evolution, since, with the increasing perfection of the arboreal activities, the assumption of this posture is an oft-recurring one. With the repetition of this action anatomical changes are brought about in the limb, for many adaptations must take place when the femur is brought into line with the vertebral axis instead of being at right angles to it. These adaptations will show their first manifestations even when the demand for the posture is only occasional. Briefly, the femur becomes capable of a more complete rotation at the hip- joint, so that its extension may be carried through a right angle, and it may take up a position parallel to the axis of the vertebral column. The capsule of the joint becomes modified to permit of this extension, and the muscles become accommodated to the new poise. In the completely adapted arboreal animal this posture tends to become more or less habitual. In some of the Lemurs it is almost as well established as in the Anthropoids themselves, and under these con- ditions the anatomical adaptations become more perfect. The fibres of the capsule of the hip-joint take on a per- 64 ARBOREAL MAN manent twist, such as is seen to perfection in the capsule of the human hip-joint (see Fig. 22), and the muscles (e.g., the M. rectus femoris) dispose themselves to the best mechanical advantage for performing the move- ments of the joint. FIG. 22. — THE HUMAN HIP-JOINT FROM BEHIND, TO SHOW TWISTING OF THE FIBRES OF THE CAPSULE OF THE JOINT. When the leg has become rotated backwards, and the muscles and joints have adapted themselves to this change, there still has to be an elaboration of the support- ing mechanism in this new position. These forces are all in action during arboreal life, but they gain an added importance in the habitual orthograde posture of Man. ARBOREAL ADAPTATIONS OF HIND-LIMB 65 The trunk is first suspended upright from the arms upon the extended legs (as in the existing Gibbons) (see Fig. 23), next its weight is partially borne upon the extended legs (as in the existing Giant Apes), afterwards it is entirely borne and balanced upon the fully extended legs in all the ordinary activities of the animal (as in Man). The anatomical adaptations which accompany these changes, as they are seen in existing Primates, are practically continuous and harmonious ; but this is not equivalent to saying that the evo- lution of the process is seen in progress among existing types. In Man, the fascial insertion and the great increase in size of the M. gluteus maximus, the extended fascial inser- tions of other leg muscles, the modifi- cations of the calf muscles (M. gastro- cnemius and M. soleus), and, above all, the development of the M. peroneus ter- tius, are all instances of the speciali- zations of muscles for the balancing of an upright body upon an extended leg. These are later changes produced by terrestrial bipedal orthograde habits, in which the suspending assistance of the hands is entirely dispensed with, but all these things had their beginnings in purely arboreal life. Only one other change we need notice here, and that is the finishing touch of the eyersion of the foot in Man. When the arboreal hind-limb has been perfected as a supporting organ in an extended position, it is still a purely FIG. 23. — DIAGRAM OF A GIBBON (Hy- lobates lar) SUS- PENDED BY THE GRASP OF ITS HANDS. From a drawing made from a pho- tograph by Prof. Arthur Keith. 5 66 ARBOREAL MAN arboreal grasping-supporting limb. As such, its third segment is still fitted for application to the branches upon the grasp of which its powers of support depend. In conformity with this, its sole is inturned, so that it may be applied to the rounded sides of the branches along which the animal walks. The higher Apes and primitive Man climb up branches with the big toe separated from the other toes, so that the outer side of the foot tends to be applied to one side of the branch, whilst the big toe grasps the other side. In this method of progression the foot is inverted, the soles look inwards, from opposite sides of the branch, towards each other. When the branches are exchanged for the level surface of the earth, this inversion of the foot is a useful adaptation no longer, and in terrestrial bipedal progression a new mechanism is initiated for the e version of the foot. Into these changes — which are peculiarly human — it is impossible to enter, since they are all finishing touches added after the arboreal habit was abandoned. The eversion of the foot of Man is a post-arboreal development, so also is the perfected mechanism for balancing the trunk upon the extended leg; but the extension of the leg upon the trunk, and the anatomical adaptations it involved, are pure out- comes of the ordinary evolution of the arboreal habit. CHAPTER XII THUMBS AND BIG TOES So far, we have, in considering the question of the develop- ment of the grasp, dealt only with the power of (1) adap- ting the palmar surface of the hand and foot to the branch, and (2) flexing the ringers over it, to make the adaptation more perfect. For the perfected grasp another factor comes in, since the hold is made more secure by folding digits over both sides of the object to be grasped. This simple requirement has led to the most divergent develop- ments, when the climbing Vertebrates are looked at as a whole. Among the existing Reptiles, the Chame- leons show the most extreme development of arboreal grasp, and in them the fourth and fifth digits are turned directly backwards, away from the third, second and first, which retain their primitive forward direction. In the perching Birds, some variety exists in the arrangement of the clasping digits; and the so-called Zygodactyle foot of the Scansores achieves the same effect as is attained by the Chameleon. In the Mammals, and especially among the Primate stock, the arboreal life has led to the specialization of one digit upon hand and foot, which opposes the remaining four digits. These opposing digits are the thumb (pol- lex) and the big toe (hallux). By an opposing digit we mean one that can be turned round so that its palmar aspect is opposed to the palmar aspect of the remaining digits, and therefore can be placed, for example, upon the opposite side of a branch. The subjects of thumbs and big toes has provided an 67 68 ARBOREAL MAN arena in which anatomists, philosophers, and even divines have met and done battle. Man has a well-developed thumb, which is opposable to the remaining fingers. He has a big toe, which is well developed, but which is not opposable to his other toes. The human thumb has received excessive praise from philosophers, the big toe has also come in for its share, but upon the question of the homology of the hallux and pollex there is the widest difference of opinion. Arguments upon the question have been carried to extremes. " I have heard a distinguished naturalist say to a class that he would stake anything, short of his eternal salvation, that the thumb corresponds to the little toe, and the little finger to the great toe, and that he should think his life well spent in establishing the doctrine ' ' (Dwight ) . We need not be led aside into any such controversies, for it does not matter to us if the thumb finds its strict serial homologue in the little toe or in the big toe; it is quite certain that in the latter it finds its exact functional equivalent. By way of homology we will be quite satis- fied with the simple fact that, in the mammalian position of the limbs, it is the digit which is situated nearest the middle line of the body that is specialized as the opposing digit. This power to oppose one digit to the remaining members of the series is no part of the heritage of the primitive third segment of the limb ; it is a new develop- ment called forth by the increasing perfection and the increasing needs of the power to grasp. The mere ana- tomical arrangement by which opposition may be pro- duced among the digits is no necessary part of the char- acteristics of the Primates, nor is it alone within their phylum that it is displayed. Some of the very thoroughly arboreal Marsupials have perfected this arrangement, and most of the Phalangers possess an opposable big toe. Even developments such as are seen in the Chameleon, among the Reptiles, and in the Parrots, among Birds, are hinted at in the hand of the Koala (Phascolarctus), in THUMBS AND BIG TOES 69 which the two inner digits tend to be separated from, and opposed to, the outer three. Certain arboreal Rodents have developed very perfectly opposable thumbs and big toes upon lines exactly similar to the Primates, and this feature is seen very beautifully in an arboreal mouse (Mus margarettce) discovered by Charles Hose in Borneo. Within the Primate phylum some very curious irregu- larities are apparent in the distribution of the power of opposing thumbs and big toes among the scattered living types. It seems strange that no New-World monkey possesses a perfectly opposable thumb, although all possess an opposable big toe. Among the New- World Primates the thumb is not perfectly opposable, and is always permanently in line with the rest of the digits; it tends to be small and unimportant, and may be entirely undeveloped. At first sight it might seem that this arrangement was correlated with the development of a prehensile tail, but all the American Primates are not prehensile-tailed. Nevertheless, it is not beyond possibility that some func- tional factor may have been the common cause for both developments ; a common factor may have led to the loss, or non-development, of the opposable thumb and to the perfection of the prehensile tail, but these two features need not occur in combination. This I regard as the most probable explanation, and in the actual method of climb- ing characteristic of different groups the origin of the different developments probably lies. The little Marmosets (Hapalidce), which have claws instead of nails upon all the digits save the big toe, possess a well-developed, but not opposable, thumb. In the Cebidce the condition varies. The Howling Monkeys (Mycetes] possess well-developed thumbs, prehensile tails, and the usual opposable big toes. The Sakis (Pithecia) have well-developed thumbs, but the tail is not prehensile ; the Night Monkeys (Nyctipithecus] show the same features. In the prehensile-tailed Spider Monkeys (Ateles) 70 ARBOREAL MAN the thumb is rudimentary or absent, while the Woolly Monkeys (Lagothrix) possess a thumb. The Capuchins of the typical genus Cebus possess a well-developed thumb and a tail, which, though partially prehensile, is not so specialized as that of Ateles or Lagothrioc. FIG. 24. FIG. 25. FIG. 24.— PLANTAR SURFACE OP THE EIGHT FOOT OF Tarsius Spectrum, SHOWING THE PECULIAR DEVELOPMENT OF THE BIG TOE. FIG 25. — PALMAR SURFACE OF THE EIGHT HAND OF Tarsius Spectrum. . In all the Old- World Primates the pollex, when present, is opposable. In the Lemurs the big toe is opposable and is often extremely specialized, the hallux standing apart from the foot in some species, such as Tarsius spectrum, in a manner reminiscent of the split foot of some of the arboreal members of lower orders (Fig. 24). The thumb is also well developed and opposable in most higher or typical Lemurs (see Fig. 25). In the Asiatic THUMBS AND BIG TOES monkeys of the genus Semnopithecus, which includes the sacred Langurs, the thumb is small but still opposable, and in the allied African genus Colubus it is reduced to a mere tubercle, or is altogether absent. The well-developed big toe is present in all (see Fig. 26). In the Anthropoids, as a rule, the thumb and the big toe are well developed and opposable. We may therefore say that among the scattered and very diverse living members of the Primates the develop- ment of the thumb and big toe shows both from the point of view of mere size, and as opposable digits, some striking irregularities. But it is not to be doubted that the underlying principle is clear enough, that the arboreal habit develops the specialized and opposable thumb and big toe, and that peculiar habits of climbing account for the actual condition present in the hand and foot of any individual species. A freakish development of tree-climbing, or an overdoing of the pure ability to climb, may lead to secondary specializations away from the simple condition. The stock from which Man has sprung shows in this, as in so many other features, a tempered adaptation to the arboreal habit without the development of any secondary specializations. We may imagine that, from some early stage in which both thumb and big toe were equally specialized for pre- hension, the human stock cultivated especially the hand as the grasping organ, and so retained and perfected the opposable thumb. Some other members of the Primate stock depended more upon the grasp of the foot, and so have retained and specialized an opposable big toe, at 26. — THE LEFT FOOT OF Macacus N ernes - trinus AS SEEN FROM ITS PLAN- TAR ASPECT. 72 ARBOREAL MAN times even to the extent of suppressing the development of the thumb. Some have also called in the tail to assist in the foot grasp, and further deprived the hand and thumb of their function of suspending the body in climbing. We see in this feature a correlated adaptation to the climbing habit to which I have previously drawn atten- tion; those Primates which show a tendency to depend on foot grasp descend a tree head foremost, and those which depend upon hand grasp walk down feet first. The human stock walked down, and converted the oppo- sable big toe into a remarkably useful supporting big toe. The human thumb is an arboreal grasping organ, per- fected' by ancestors which depended upon their hand grasp in their arboreal activities. The human big toe is nothing more than a modified arboreal grasping organ, the primitive characters of which were stamped upon it by its specialization as a grasping organ, which supported the weight of the body in climbing. We must not overlook the fact that although the grasping power of the big toe is largely lost in modern Europeans, it must still be reckoned as a distinctly human possession. Kohlbrugge has remarked that one would hardly dare to suggest that the presence of a prehensile big toe was a sign of human inferiority, were the discus- sion to take place at an anthropological congress held in Tokio. In the very primitive negrito races the power of foot grasp is well retained. For the purposes of petty theft the Sakai largely relies on the grasp of his toes (Skeat and Blagden) ; and very many other instances could be furnished from races far more highly placed in the human scale. CHAPTER XIII THE HUMAN FOOT THE human hand, a strangely, almost shockingly, primi- tive survival, has received enormous praise mistakenly lavished by the philosopher and the anatomist; but the human foot, a wonderfully modified and distinctly human member, has had but scant appreciation. This assertion is made in the face of the fact that the human foot has provided the subject-matter for monographs in several languages. The foot is apt to be regarded as a poor relation of the hand, as a thing which, once being far more useful, has degenerated, within the narrow confines of a boot, into a rather distorted and somewhat useless member. Al- though in modern Man the boot has had its definite in- fluence (as in limiting the possibilities of the power of grasp), such generalizations concerning the human foot are very far from true. If Man should wish to point with pride to any organ the structure of which definitely severs him from all other existing Primates, it is to the foot that he should point. If " missing links " are to be tracked with complete success, the foot, far more than the skull, or the teeth, or the shins, will mark them as Monkey or as Man. The weakness of Achilles lay in his heel; the weakness of the arboreal Primate masquerading as Man lies in the structure of its foot. It is in the grades of evolution of the foot that the stages of the missing link will be most plainly presented to the future paleontologist, when time and chance shall -have discovered the feet of such forms as Pithecanthropus and Eoanthropus. 73 74 ARBOREAL MAN There was a period in zoological literature when dis- cussion was waged earnestly, and without satisfaction, as to what should be called a hand and what a foot. The hand and the foot are alike in seme animals; they are quadrupedal or quadrumanous, but some exhibit differences in the structure of the third segment of the fore and hind limbs. The point in dispute was the exact stage at which differentiation in a quadrumanous animal produced a hand and a foot. In this academic discussion Etienne Geoffroy St. Hillaire, Huxley, Owen, and many others took their part. We may say, however, that the problem as it was presented did not offer any very special difficulty beyond the determination of the function of the member. This was the solution which Huxley recognized at once, and to which he always adhered. The Anthro- poids have hands and feet, and their hands and feet are differentiated by their function. We will accept such a solution, and assume that we understand perfectly well what we mean when we speak of a Gorilla's foot. That is a simple way out of the dilemma, but we must recognize it does not do away with the difficulty which presents itself the moment we attempt to differentiate between a hand and a foot from the point of view of structure. A monkey's foot is a definite thing; it has a definite function which distinguishes it from the hand (see Fig. 27). The same applies with even more force to the case of an Anthropoid, but the hand and foot in these animals are, anatomically, remarkably similar structures in many ways. The specialization of the foot as a supporting organ is carried to very definite lengths in the Anthro- poids; in the Gorilla is seen the best foot developed among the Giant Apes. We will therefore take this foot as an anatomical illustration of the stage of development to which foot differentiation is carried in existing Primates. The foot of a Gorilla differs from the hand in the fact that all the digits are placed nearer to the extremity .of the third segment of the hind limb; there is a greater THE HUMAN FOOT 75 length of foot behind the base of the great toe than there is of hand behind the base of the thumb (see Fig. 28). This posterior elongation of the foot or development of a heel is present also in many monkeys. The big toe of the Gorilla is larger and better developed than the FIG. 27. — THE LEFT TOOT OF Cercopithecus palatinus SEEN FROM ITS PLANTAR ASPECT. FIG. 28. — PLANTAR SURFACE OF THE LEFT FOOT OF A YOUNG GORILLA. With details of the cutaneous markings, after Duckworth, from a specimen in the Cambridge Collection. thumb ; the remaining toes are not so well developed as the corresponding fingers ; nevertheless, they retain exactly the same relative proportions. We may speak of a digital formula for hand and foot, such a formula being an expression of the relative degree of projection of the 76 ARBOREAL MAN ! digits. In the Gorilla, the digital formula for the foot is exactly the same as that for the hand, and both may be expressed as: 3>4>2>5>1. Such a formula is an exceedingly primitive one, and it is present in the primi- tive manus of such chelonian reptiles as the water tor- toises. The strangely primitive human hand has an identical digital formula, the third being the finger that reaches farthest forwards, the fourth the next, the second the next, followed by the fifth, and the thumb is farthest back of all. There is an almost equally common varia- tion in the human hand in which the second digit may be as long as, or longer than, the fourth, and this is doubtless due to the functional importance of the index- finger. I am not sure that it should not be considered as the typical human condition. In such cases the formula stands thus: 3>2>4>5>1, or 3>2=4>5>1. Man retains a very primitive digital formula for his hand. His nearest Primate kinsfolk retain it for both hands and feet. It is when we attempt to apply this formula to the human foot that we see how great is the alteration that has taken place between the existing Anthropoid with the best primate foot and Man himself. The digital , formula for the human foot is as a rule: 1>>2;>3>4>>5 (see Figs. 29 and 30). Such a statement holds good for the feet of the great majority of present-day British people. It is commonly assumed by artists, and even by surgeons, that the elongated big toe which projects in advance of the other four toes is not a natural human characteristic, but is a result of boot pressure. A long big toe is regarded rather as a deformity than as a natural human possession in which to take justifiable pride. Professor Flower long ago turned his attention to this point, and he examined the feet of hundreds of the bare- footed children of Perthshire, and among them all he found no case in which the big toe did not project beyond the second toe. We must look upon a big toe which THE HUMAN FOOT 77 dominates the whole series as a typically human and a perfectly natural feature. Nevertheless, it is common enough to see feet in which the second toe is longer than the big toe. People who have feet with such a digital formula are apt to be somewhat proud of the fact, for P\\ \\ FIG. 29.— TYPE OF FOOT IN WHICH THE BIG TOE is CONSIDERABLY LONGER THAN ANY OF THE OTHER TOES, WHICH DIMINISH IN REGULAR SEQUENCE FROM FIRST TO FIFTH. Traced from the outline of the foot. such a foot is supposed to conform to the " Greek ideal," but that this type of foot ever was the ideal of Greek artists is disputed by some authorities upon the subject, and certainly we may assume that it is less typically human, and more ape-like, than the type of foot of the average hospital patient who possesses a long big toe 78 ARBOREAL MAN (see Fig. 31). So far we have as the typical digital formula for the human foot 1>2>3>4>5, with a not uncommon variant 2>1>3>4>5. There is yet another type, which seems much less common, in which 2=3^>1 >4>5. In the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons is the skeleton of a Bushman, in which it is possible that FIG. FIG. 31. FIG. 30. — OUTLINE OF A CHILD'S FOOT. FIG. 31 — OUTLINE OF A FOOT IN WHICH THE SECOND TOE is LONGER THAN THE BIG TOE. THE SO-CALLED GREEK IDEAL. the third digit was longest of all — a distinctly anthropoid condition. The change from the so-called Greek ideal to the foot with the dominant big toe is almost certainly no outcome of boot-wearing, nor is any one link in the whole sequence of the atrophy of the fifth, fourth, third, and second digits. All are natural processes of evolution, and all have probably taken place in a series of missing •'• '. .'.: THE HUMAN FOOT 79 Zoologically speaking, we may say that the very useful and specialized foot adapted for terrestrial progression is a foot of few digits. It may, in fact, be a foot composed of a solitary digit. The evolutionary stages by which the horse has come to stand solely upon its third digit are well known. Similar processes produced the two- digited foot of the deer and of the ostrich. There can be no doubt that Man is trusting, not to his third digit, but to his first, and all the others are undergoing a process of comparative atrophy. This is in reality a most interesting problem. There is an admitted tendency to specialize one digit in a thoroughly adapted terrestrial foot. Man applied an arboreal foot to terrestrial pro- gression, and in this arboreal foot the best-developed member was the old grasping digit — the first or big toe. It seems that upon taking to a terrestrial life he has started the elaboration of this already specialized toe. and is tending towards the development of a foot which is quite unique — a foot in which the first digit is the dominant. and in the end, perhaps, the sole surviving, member. It needs no special demonstration to make plain the fact that the little toe is somewhat of a rudiment in most Europeans. Usually it is but a poor thing; its nail is ill developed, and at times no nail is present. It is particularly liable to that circulatory disturbance which manifests itself in chilblains, and not uncommonly it seems in a poor state of nutrition. Most people possess but little power of movement in it, and its skeleton shows that its atrophic condition has affected the bones and joints, for the last two phalanges are very commonly fused together, making it short of a joint as compared with the rest of the toes. Very commonly its axis is not straight, and the toe is humped up and also somewhat bent laterally. It is easy to assume that all this is merely the result of wearing boots, but it is perfectly certain that this common explanation is not the correct one. 80 ARBOREAL MAN In many races, the members of which are quite innocent of wearing boots at any period of their lives, the little toe is just as atrophic as it is in the average London hospital patient, and in some unbooted native races it is even more degenerated than is common in the booted Londoner. Among the Malays, the absence of a nail upon the remarkably stumpy fifth toe is not at all un- common. The barefooted races in Nubia are no better off in this matter, and even in the very primitive Sakai the little toe has suffered. Vaughan Stevens has noted that the little toe of the Sakai is not straight, but is " bent like ours," and is small in proportion; but the Jakuns, according to the same authority, have little toes which are straight (Skeat and Blag den). I imagine that just as the big toe is becoming the dominant toe, the little toe is becoming a rudiment, and I presume that, in their turn, the fourth, third, and second toes are undergoing a human evolutionary atrophy. There is a most interesting anatomical feature which is explained by this trend of human foot development. In the hand a system of short muscles, which serves to part the fingers and close them together (M. interosseii), is ranged symmetrically upon either side of the third or middle digit. This digit therefore constitutes the middle line of the hand from which, and to which, the other fingers can be moved laterally. In the Monkeys, with the digital formula of the foot similar to that of the hand, a like grouping of muscles is seen about the third toe, which in movements, as well as in length and axis, constitutes the middle line digit of the foot. The same condition is seen in the Chimpanzee and Orang-utan. In Man, however, the muscle symmetry is ranged about the second digit, and to and from this second digit the other toes are moved laterally. The middle line of the human foot has changed from the third to the THE HUMAN FOOT 81 second toe. In the Gorilla, a most interesting phase is seen, for while in most specimens the middle line of the foot passes through the third toe, " it must be admitted that many Gorillas possess the human arrangement, these muscles being grouped about an axis formed by the second digit " (Duckworth). When digits atrophy and disappear in phylogeny, it seems to be the rule that their reduction starts from their distal extremities ; the terminal phalanx diminishes first, and the metacarpal is only affected at a much later period in evolution. Metacarpal bones of absent digits persist, as the well-known splint bones of the horse. It is to be expected that the same order should be followed in the diminishing toes of the outer side of the human foot. The terminal phalanx of the fifth toe is commonly a rudiment, and often it is fused to the next phalanx, of which bone it then constitutes a mere distal tubercle. Compared with the fingers, there has been a great reduc- tion in the terminal phalanges of all the toes except the big toe, and the two basal phalanges are diminished in a somewhat lesser degree. In the majority of cases, how- ever, the metacarpal bones have not suffered any very marked atrophy, and the metacarpal formula is often that which should exist for the primitive digits. Much individual variation is seen in the skeletons of different feet, but the metacarpal bone of the big toe is, at times, shorter than that of the second, which in its turn is shorter than the third; the fourth, again, is shorter than the third, and the fifth shorter than the fourth. One very curious evidence of this skeletal condition is seen in very many feet, even when the big toe is far in advance of all the rest. Although a line joining the tips of the toes slopes without interruption from the first to the fifth, a line joining the bases of these toes does not follow the same course. From the first cleft it rises to the second, and from the fourth cleft it rises to the third, and there is thus produced a sharp angle in the line which 82 ARBOREAL MAN usually falls opposite the middle of the base of the third digit (see Figs. 29, 30 and 31). This line has exactly the same contour in the hand, and is the typical one seen in the Monkey's foot. It is the outline of the primitive foot preserved in its primitive condition by arboreal life. The contour of the anterior extremity of the human foot has therefore not undergone much change from its primitive arboreal condition, the alteration being almost solely confined to the phalanges of the free digits. It is the outer toes which are undergoing atrophy, and this atrophy has not to any great extent affected the metacarpal bones, nor altered the outline of the foot itself. Human specializations seem to be producing a tendency to depend upon, and develop especially as supporting organs, the bones of the inner margin of the foot. The big toe and its supporting bones are becoming the principal axis of the foot. The imperfect efforts at walking upon the feet which the higher Primates can make have not attained to this human development. The human baby walks upon the outer side of its feet when it first learns to walk, and the bones upon this side of the foot are the first to become ossified. But a typically human and later change is the eversion of the foot, which brings its inner margin into the line transmitting the weight of the body to the ground. A whole series of finishing touches in human development is brought into play in this process, but since they are essentially not arboreal effects, they cannot be dealt with here. However, without going into the details of the eversion of the foot, the general facts are clear enough. Man has. inherited a primitive, and arboreal foot; purely human modifications are obviously at work producing a very typical human type of structure which, adapted in the first place for support in an arboreal habitat, is now being fitted for terrestrial progression. The human foot is a THE HUMAN FOOT 83 definite human evolution, and some may take comfort in remembering that it is evidence of a high grade of human evolution to possess a long big toe accompanied by a steadily diminishing series of toes towards the outer side of the foot, and that it is not necessary to label as *' sensible " the person, or the fashion, which seeks to confine this human foot into a boot constructed for the digital formula of an arboreal Primate. CHAPTER XIV THE SECESSION OF THE SNOUT REGION WE have seen that one of the things made possible by the emancipation of the fore-limb and the development of the power of grasp is the ability of the animal to seize its food with its hand and convey it to its mouth. These are two separate actions, and although their influence is exerted in the same direction, they are so distinct as to need somewhat separate treatment. The perfected com- bination of these actions doubtless came slowly into the arboreal stock, but the power to seize food with the hands is present in some quite lowly forms, and the Tree Shrews (Tupaiadce) already possess the power of raising food to their mouths. In all the Lemurs these actions are perfected, and passing over the degrees to which they ars developed in different species, we will study the completed process as seen in a typical Primate, and note what correlated changes may be bound up in its full develop- ment. We must first turn aside to note that there are other animals than the Primates and their kindred which can grasp food in their hands and convey it to their mouths. There are even animals showing no trace of being arboreal which can do this action with great address. It is the same with all systems and organs, and it is a story to which we shall repeatedly have to turn, for, as we have seen, the fore-limb may receive some degree of emancipa- tion by other activities than tree-climbing. Jumping and hopping animals, and animals which sit upright, can use their hands for many skilled movements. Jerboas 84 THE RECESSION OF THE SNOUT REGION 85 (Dipodinoe), and many other hopping Rodents, eat food held between their fore-paws. Beavers can hold a small object clasped by the palm and claws of one hand, and Marmots (Arctomys) even go farther than this, for when sitting erect they can pick up their food from the ground. Truly arboreal animals of other stocks again possess this power, and squirrels, phalangers, and opossums are good examples of limited hand-feeding arboreal types. So far as the process goes in any of these animals, the changes which we are picturing in the Primate stock take place harmoniously. A typical Primate obtains its food with its hand instead of adopting the common mammalian method of taking it with its mouth: one function of the mouth, that of food-getting, is therefore relegated to the hand in the Primates. It may be said on broad lines that throughout the whole of the animal kingdom the mouth parts show a development depending upon the nature of the animal's food and the method of taking it. If it is the hand which becomes the grasping organ, the mouth and the anatomical structures connected with it need no longer be developed in any special way to carry on this function. The food-grasping power of the Primate hand renders unnecessary the development of grasping lips and a long series of grasping teeth. Again, the fact that the food once grasped by the hand is conveyed by the hand to the mouth renders the mouth and its associated parts merely an organ for dealing with food already grasped and carried to it. A mouth merely adapted for the reception of food already grasped and brought to it is a structure very different from a mouth adapted for the purposes of reach- ing out for food, seizing the food so reached, and subse- quently dealing with it. When the mouth is the food-obtaining organ, there is a necessity for its situation being advanced from the face, and especially that part of the face in which the eyes are 86 ARBOREAL MAN situated. A long snout with a mouth opening far in advance of the eyes is a necessity in any animal which uses its mouth alone, in all the processes of obtaining food. The grazing herbivores must carry their food- getting mouth far in advance of their eyes. The long face of the horse may serve as a familiar example. The animals which catch insects must have a similar structure, and the " snouty " insectivorous Shrews are typical of such animals. The more the fore-limbs serve to obtain or to hold the food, the less is this snout developed, and I am terming the change which hand-feeding produces the recession of the snout region. In herbivorous animals the transition is very easily seen; the long-faced horse may be contrasted (solely from the point of view of this function) with the short-faced squirrel which holds food between its fore-paws. In carnivorous animals and mixed feeders another factor comes in, for the mouth may be used, not only for grasping, but for killing the food, or the fore-limb may take over this function in part. The long -faced dog^ grasps and kills its food with its mouth, the shorter-faced ca/fc holds its food with its fore- paws and kills either with its paws or with its mouth; but the tiger, in which the snout region has shortened very considerably, kills as a rule with its fore-limb, and holds the kill with its paws. I have noticed, in this respect, some interesting phases among the Primate stock. I had at the same time, living as nearly as possible in their natural state, some Lemurs (Nycticebus tardigradus) and some Monkeys. Both of these animals, although mixed feeders, are in a state of nature very fond of animal food, the Lemur delighting in insects, especially grass- hoppers, and young birds, the monkey always ready to kill and eat anything, from a cockroach to a chicken. The Lemur would catch a grasshopper with its hand (or its foot), and would catch a bird put into its cage in exactly the same way, but after a preliminary squeezing would almost invariably put it to its mouth to THE RECESSION OF THE SNOUT REGION 87 kill it with its teeth. I have seen Nycticebus tear grass- hoppers to pieces with its hands, but birds it always killed by biting. The monkeys were adepts at catching birds, and although chained they had no difficulty in seizing the confiding Java sparrows that were attracted by their food. The bird was caught in one hand, and was then killed by being pulled and twisted between the two hands. Generally the monkey wrung the bird's neck so thoroughly that it succeeded in pulling it altogether apart; it killed with its hands, and then conveyed the kill to its mouth with its hands. In the Primates, owing to the preponderant use of the fore-limb, there is no need for a mouth which reaches out for food, or for a mouth which seizes food or kills it when seized, all these functions being discharged by the mobile and grasping fore-limb. Now teeth are developed for different purposes. They are developed for cutting herbage, for seizing animal food, and for killing prey as well as for biting it up pre- paratory to swallowing. Some teeth subserve the func- tion of obtaining a variety of food in a variety of ways, and some subserve the function of preparing this food for the processes of digestion. With the adaptation of the hand for obtaining food, the need for the specialization of teeth for this purpose will no longer be felt so strongly, and it is natural to suppose that the tooth series will become abbreviated, only those teeth which are necessary for dealing with food brought to them by the hand remaining fully functional. We may assume, as a ground- plan of the mammalian tooth series, an upper and a lower set, composed of three incisors, one canine, four pre- molars, and three molars upon each side of the jaw. , Such a tooth series comprises forty-four teeth, and it / • is seen, for example, in the elongated jaws of the omnivorous pig. If we trace this tooth series through the Primates and their probable next of kin, we find the full forty-four in 88 ARBOREAL MAN the terrestrial Insectivora. In the arboreal Tree Shrews (Tupaiadce) it has become reduced to thirty-eight by the loss of one upper incisor and an upper and lower pre- mclar upon each side. In the Lemurs only thirty-six teeth remain, for a corresponding lower incisor has been lost. In the Old- World Monkeys, the Anthropoid Apes, and Man, one more premolar is lost in each jaw upon either side, and the dentition is reduced to a set of thirty- two teeth. In Man there are signs of a further reduction. The reduction of the tooth series and the shortening of the jaw in the arboreal stock go on step by step together, and for the same reason, and yet to a certain extent the two developments are independent of each other. The tooth series may diminish and may even disappear, yet if food is still reached for and is seized by the mouth the snout region will remain elongated. A toothless animal may still be a long-jawed animal if long jaws are needed to take food which when taken requires no teeth for its killing or for its mastication. With hand-feeding the recession of the snout may outstrip the reduction of the tooth series, and this process is evidenced in the stock we are considering. Starting with a full mammalian series of forty-four teeth, the snout region may yet be so long that gaps exist between the teeth, and different groups of teeth may be widely separated from each other. Reduction in the tooth series in this stock does not in- crease the gaps, but the gaps diminish faster than the tooth series is reduced. The ultimate result of this process is that Man, with a reduced number of teeth, has the most crowded dentition. Man is the only living f\ Primate that has its teeth arranged in a continuous series, .£, and it is one of his distinctions that there are no gaps v^ between them. The process of the shortening of the snout, outstripping the process of reduction of the dental series, gives rise to one of the great problems of modern dentistry — the proper treatment of the many evils arising from overcrowded jaws. To this subject we will turn THE RECESSION OF THE SNOUT REGION 89 again, but we can here sum up the last phases of the process by saying that if primitive and natural Man has no gaps between his adult teeth, his children always have gaps between the smaller teeth of their first set ; but the children of modern and civilized Man are losing even these gaps with the shortening of the jaws. CHAPTER XV THE SECESSION OF THE JAWS AND EEDUCTION OF THE TOOTH SEKIES WITH the business of hand-feeding, Man has gone a great deal farther than any other member of the Primates, and that comparatively modern development — civilized Man — has gone still farther. The highest Primates select their food with their hands, they even do more than this, for, to a certain extent, they prepare it for eating with their hands. But this preparation, though an enormous stride, does not go to very great lengths beyond peeling a banana or husking a thin-shelled nut with the fingers; for anything much more exacting the teeth are re- quisitioned. We have seen the amount of work that the hands have already saved the teeth in the evolution of an arboreal stock, and there is obviously a tendency in the highest apes for the hands to assume further duties. Man has applied his brain and his mobile hands more fully to this problem, and he has saved his teeth to the utmost limits, but has made a sorry bargain. The general bearing of these factors did not escape the notice of Darwin, but, strangely enough, he confined his argument practically to the fact that the hands of the human ancestors, armed with primitive weapons, tended to take the place of the fighting canine teeth. " As they gradu- ally acquired the habit of using stones, clubs, and other weapons, for fighting with their enemies, they would have used their jaws and teeth less and less. In this case, the jaws, together with the teeth, would have become reduced in size, as we may feel sure from innumerable analogous 90 THE RECESSION OF THE JAWS 91 cases." In many ways, therefore, human hands have replaced the functions of human teeth. There is no need to trace the stages in a story familiar to all. Man has ground, husked, prepared, cleaned, and finally cooked his food. He has freed it from hard parts, and made it " tender " in every conceivable way. His canine teeth he has replaced by the use of his hands; his flint or his knife has usurped the function of his incisors; and his molars he has relegated to the kitchen premises as a pestle and mortar in some form or other. Even when he had done all this he had not run the whole gamut of robbing his teeth and jaws of their legitimate occupation, for there is still the knife and fork of the Europeanized to perform outside the mouth those duties formerly performed within it. Every organ which loses its function must undergo a change, and unless this change leads to the assumption of new functions, the ultimate result will be an atrophy of that organ. The human teeth, deprived in great measure of their normal functions, acquire no new ones — even speaking and whistling through the teeth may not save them from their ultimate destiny — and it is not to be denied that, slowly, of course, but still surely, they are undergoing atrophy. Among existing races of mankind the fact is patent, the observation is a commonplace of anthropology. " The possession of an ample palate and large well-formed teeth by the black races is a matter of common knowledge (as is the fact that in the crania of the prehistoric inhabitants of Europe the size and quality of the teeth were superior to those at present obtaining in the same geographical area). It is therefore impossible to overlook the inference that reduction in the size of the teeth is at least attendant (if not dependent) upon the acquisition of higher grades of civilization and directly upon diet and the preparation of food." This, from the writings of Dr. Duckworth, may be taken as an orthodox statement of the general position 92 ARBOREAL MAN as summed up in modern anthropology. The more primitive races have larger and better formed teeth, rooted in more roomy palates, than members of more civilized races can boast of. There is but little need to dilate upon so well known a circumstance, but some few facts may be cited. The third molars, wisdom teeth, being the last to be erupted in the already diminished jaws, show the maxi- mum effects of the atrophic influences of disuse. In modern civilized Man these teeth are erupted late, fre- quently in a condition of defective development, and usually in such a manner as to restrict, if not entirely to obviate, their functional utility. In civilized Man they are always smaller than the first or second molars, and as a rule all their biting cusps are not fully developed. They may not all be erupted ; sometimes they are present in one jaw, and not in the other, and often when present in both jaws they do not meet and bite together. Frequently they altogether fail to be erupted. In primitive races they are rarely absent, they are cut earlier, and are but little if any smaller than the other molars, and they bite and grind together in a perfectly even manner. In the skulls of the ancient inhabitants of Egypt and Nubia this perfection of the third molars is very striking. Among the modern Egyptians — even those of them lead- ing a town life in Cairo — the wisdom teeth are cut at times well before the eighteenth year — full six years before they make their imperfect appearance in most Europeans. In the more primitive living races the third molars are usually very fine teeth, erupted early, and fully capable of all the typical molar-grinding functions. In the skulls of the earliest human remains in which the dental series is preserved, the molar teeth are large, and the molar series diminishes little, if at all, from the first to the third molar; indeed, in some cases the primitive con- dition of a reversed state of affairs is seen, and the THE RECESSION OF THE JAWS 93 third molar is larger than the second, which in turn is larger than the first. In modern Man the first molar is markedly larger than the second, which is again markedly larger than the third. In the higher Apes the third molar is the largest tooth of the molar series, and it erupts before the canine. There is one other circum- stance connected with the molar teeth that is worthy of note. It is not extremely rare for a fourth molar tooth to be developed in the roomy jaws of the skulls of ancient races, and it is not at all uncommon for some diminished remnant of this tooth to be present in modern primitive Man. The presence of this fourth molar is all the more remarkable, since its normal presence has to be sought in a stock so apparently remote as the metatherian (Marsupial) Mammals. Apart altogether from the anatomical development of individual teeth, some light is thrown upon this question by studying the quality of the teeth when developed. We know that the teeth readily decay, and that caries in modern civilized man affects the permanent set of the adult and the temporary set of the child. Caries of the milk teeth is so common as to be the rule in modern city children, and few children shed their milk teeth without decay having played some havoc among a set of teeth the normal functional life of which is naturally brief. But although the milk teeth were not intended to remain in functional activity for more than ten years, they were not meant to decay before or at that time. It is a striking fact that, in the work of the Archaeological Survey of Nubia (1907-08), no case of caries of the milk teeth was found in the skull of any child living before the dawn of the Christian era in Nubia. Among the hundreds of cases examined, not one case of caries of the milk denti- tion was discovered in the children of the early Egyptians. The children of the more primitive living races rarely show any traces of decay in the teeth of their infantile set. In modern civilized children living a city life, not 94 AKBOREAL MAN only is caries of the milk teeth almost the rule, but dental surgeons commonly " stop " milk teeth nowadays, so early is the onset of their decay. The decay of the permanent teeth needs no description, its almost universal occurrence in civilized modern man being familiar to all. But remarkably good sets of permanent teeth are found in skulls of historical date, and in the remains of ancient races extensive caries of the permanent teeth becomes increasingly rare. One definite factor has certainly played a large part in this deterioration of the teeth of modern Man, and this factor is the loss of the reaction to wear and tear — the loss of the power of repair. When a horse grinds its molars together it wears them down, and the enamel with which the surfaces of the cusps are covered is worn off, and the main substance of the tooth (dentine) is exposed below. Year after year the cusps are worn natter, and an ever-changing pattern is produced, the pattern being made by areas of exposed dentine surrounded by margins of enamel. The dentine which is exposed in this way reacts to the grinding influences, and becomes hardened on its surface, and changed to a condition known as secondary dentine, which provides almost as hard a surface as that of the original enamel. By this process the animal will gradually wear its teeth flat, but these worn and flattened teeth are perfectly sound teeth. The teeth of ancient races and of modern primitive races show well this dentine reaction. Human teeth may be ground down by wear and tear, and react to the grinding influence. But in modern civilized Man the reaction is very much diminished, and in the majority of cases, when the enamel is worn through, the fate of the tooth is sealed, since the dentine, instead of reacting, becomes the site of decay. We have seen that in the whole Primate (and the whole arboreal) stock there has been a recession of the jaw. In one way this feature has been carried to very definite human lengths by very definite human methods. When THE RECESSION OF THE JAWS 95 arrived at its highest Anthropoid stage, the still relatively large tooth-bearing (alveolar) margin of the jaws is well in advance of the rest of the jaws. The tooth-bearing surfaces and the teeth project. The upper jaw is prog- nathous, and the lower jaw has a very receding chin. With the abbreviation of the alveolar margin in Man, the prognathism disappears and the chin makes its appear- ance. The gradations in this change are very beautifully seen in the remains of ancient Man and also in the jaws of existing primitive Man (see Fig. 32). The mandible A B FIG. 32. — ONE HALF OP THE LOWER JAW OF (A) HOMO AND (B) A MONKEY, TO SHOW THE PROMINENCE OF THE TOOTH- BEARING MARGIN IN B AND OF THE CHIN IN A. of the " Piltdown individual " is notorious, with its advanced alveolar margin and receding chin. The prognathous savage is proverbial. Man developed a chin by the shrinkage of the alveolar margin of his jaw, con- sequent upon the diminishing demands made upon the teeth, the functions of which were so largely usurped by the hands. ^Modern and civilized Man seems to be in some danger of losing even his chin as the whole mandible becomes reduced. First, the recession of the tooth- bearing margin makes the lower margin conspicuous, and a chin is developed ; and now the lower margin seems to be disposed to follow in the train of the upper. The dawn of a chinless aristocracy is no pleasing picture in the later stages of human evolution; and yet the recession of the modern jaw is not to be denied. CHAPTER XVI THE FACE AND THE CRANIUM WE have followed some of the phases by which hand- feeding and alteration of life-habit have led to the re- cession of the snout region, and we have seen the influence which this recession exerts upon the dental series; but its influences are felt in many other ways, and some other of the accompanying phenomena must receive passing attention. The snout recedes as a part of a general evolution proceeding! in arboreal life, and one other feature (to be dealt with later) which accompanies it is the steadily increasing growth of the brain. The skull as a whole may be said to consist of two parts — a part which is a containing bony case for the brain and the sense organs, and a part which is the skeleton of the mechanism for obtaining and masticating food (see Fig. 33). In the lowest arboreal animals, the second or facial part is preponderately large in proportion to the first or cranial part, but the relations of the two parts are soon altered in arboreal evolution. The growing brain de- mands a large brain case; the diminishing jaws require less bony basis. In this way the configuration of the skull is profoundly altered, for not only do the jaws shrink back, but the brain case protrudes. Apart altogether from the mere evidence of the relative sizes of the bony parts in a skeleton, there is seen in this evolution a gradual change in the arteries and veins associated with these two constituents of the head region. The internal carotid artery enters the cranium to supply the brain, the external carotid artery runs to the face THE FACE AND THE CRANIUM 97 and supplies the whole facial area with blood ; the internal jugular vein returns the blood from the brain, and the external jugular vein drains the area supplied by the external carotid artery. These two sets of vessels are of varying importance in different animals. Primitively, the external carotids and the external jugulars are by far the largest and most important vessels in the head region, and the internal carotids and internal jugulars are, relatively, inconsiderable channels. But in arboreal life, with hand-feeding and increasing brain growth, their FIG. 33. — OUTLINE OF THE SKULL OF A DOG, TO SHOW TUB RELATIVE PORTIONS DEVOTED TO THE SKELETON OF THE FACE AND TO THE SKELETON OF THE BRAIN CAVITY. relative importance becomes altered, and finally in Man and in the higher Primates the internal carotids and in- ternal jugulars far outweigh in size and importance the arteries and veins of the facial area. The gross changes which take place in the contour of the head have already been touched on, and they need no further emphasis, since they are conspicuous. A primitive arboreal Insec- tivore, such as Tupaia, has a relatively small head and a long snouty face (see Fig. 37); many Lemurs have snout regions almost as long, but others, such as Tarsius spec- trum, have faces which are already distinctly flat (see Fig. 70). In Monkeys and Anthropoids, although the jaws protrude considerably in the adults of some species, the rounded skull case and flattened forehead dominate 7 98 ARBOREAL MAN the snout region as features of the head and face (see Fig. 34). It is noteworthy that when for any reason elongation of the nose becomes characteristic of any species of monkey, this elongation is produced quite apart from any reversion to a condition of prolonged snout region. In the Proboscis Monkey (Nasalis larva- 1us) the nose reaches a remarkable degree of prominence, but there is no involvement of the maxilla or mandible in this new departure, and the same tendency is shown, FIG. 34. — OUTLINE OF A HUMAN SKULL, TO SHOW THE RELATIVE PORTIONS DEVOTED TO THE SKELETON OP THE FACE AND TO THE SKELETON OF THE BRAIN CAVITY. but to a lesser degree, in the curious Snub-Nosed Monkey (Ehinopithecus roxellance). These general alterations of the configuration of the head and face lead to several changes, especially in the position of the sense organs, which are probably of the greatest importance. When an animal has a fully elon- gated snout region, it may be said to possess a long face with an eye situated upon each side of it ; but when the snout region has undergone complete recession, it may be said to have a flat face with two eyes situated upon the front of it. The mere fact of the recession of the snout produces this change, for the two eyes are turned THE FACE AND THE CRANIUM 91) to the front as the elongated muzzle shrinks between them. As the eyes begin to take up a forward position, a bar of bone forms behind them and intervenes between them and the space at the side of the skull in which the muscles of the jaw lie. In the Tree Shrews, the orbit has already commenced its separation from the temporal fossa; in Tarsius spectrum, the separation is complete, as we might imagine from the shortness of its face, but in all the other Lemurs the orbit and the temporal fossa communicate freely. In all the Monkeys and Anthropoid Apes, as in Man, the orbital cavity is an entirely separated com- partment surrounded by bony walls and containing the eyeball and its associated muscles, nerves, and vessels. The bringing of the eyes to the front of the face and their lodgement in separated bony orbital cavities has, in all probability, far-reaching effects; but it must be looked upon only as a part of the general process of change in head formation brought about by hand-feeding in arboreal life. Another factor not to be disregarded is the change to which we will allude more fully later — the alteration of the head poise. Some consideration of this change is inseparable from a study of the recession of the snout region. When the face becomes so short that the whole skull is balanced upon its condyles, a complete change takes place in the axis of the principal movements of the head upon the trunk, and a greatly increased range is given to these movements. The arboreal Primates may nod their heads backwards and forwards, as in the human method of saying " Yes." This movement takes place between the condyles of the skull and the first cervical vertebra, and it is the primitive movement of raising and lowering the head common to all Mammals. But they also have an enormously increased power of turning the head from side to side, in the human method of signifying " No." This movement takes place between the first and second, as well as, to a lesser extent, between 100 ARBOREAL MAN the other cervical vertebrae ; but a wide range of movement is permitted in the neighbourhood of the skull before the other joints of the neck are involved. This ability to turn the head quickly in any direction has had its influence upon the principal sense organs. Both eyes may be directed immediately, and at the same time, towards an object which attracts attention. In Tarsius, which possesses a wonderfully mobile head poise, there seems almost a tendency for the head movements to replace the movements of the enormous eyes, but in all other Primates, the head mobility merely supplements and aids the mobility of the eyeballs. The head may be tilted into any conceivable position, so as to be placed at the greatest advantage to catch a sound proceeding from any direction. The sense organs may be brought into greater harmony and their teachings may be correlated by this mobility of the head, and, indeed, it is this mobility which has replaced that seen in lower animals in the pinna itself. An arboreal animal which has arrived at this stage does not " cock " or " prick " its ears when it hears a sound, but turns its mobile head so that it can catch the sound to greatest advantage, and at the same time bring the cause of the sound under the observation of its eyes, i^ Man and the Anthropoids have lost all trace of the useful movements of the external ear upon the scalp, but he and the arboreal Primates have compensated for this in the increased power to move the head — a power permitted by the altered configuration of the skull con- sequent upon the recession of the snout region. CHAPTER XVII THE SPINOUS PEOCESSES OF THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN IN all works which deal with Comparative Anatomy, or with Anthropology, much attention is devoted to the human distinctions of poise of body. Various archi- tectural features of the human body are modelled upon a plan somewhat different from that seen in most other animals, and these alterations of structural details are, for the most part, associated with a typical human poise of body. All these points have been eagerly seized upon as definite and measurable human features, and without turning aside now for any discussion of theories con- cerning them, it is our business to see if any of these features were impressed upon the body of Man as a result of his philogenetic youth spent among the branches. Most of the problems concern, in some measure, the vertebral column as the central axis around which the rest of the body is disposed. There are, for example, the questions of the poise of the head upon the neck, the presence of the sinuous curves of the vertebral column — cervical, dorsal, lumbar, and sacral curvatures; the actual method by which vertebra articulates with vertebra; the varying size, shape, and number of the elements which compose different regions of the column; and finally the manner in which the column articulates with the pelvic girdle. We will start our examination of the backbone in a somewhat irregular way by considering, not the general curves and articulations of the whole column, but the 101 102 ARBOREAL MAN characters of those processes which project, one from the dorsal aspect of each vertebra, and which are named spinous processes or neural spines. These spinous pro- cesses stand up in line all down the middle of the back, and to them are attached portions of the great muscle (M. erector spinse) which acts upon the vertebral column. In actual disposition these spinous processes differ greatly in different animals ; and the most conspicuous differences are to be noted in the direction in which they slope. Some, or all of them, may stand up quite straight, or they may lean towards the head end, or the tail end, of the animal. In the Reptiles, the arrangement of the spines is comparatively simple, for in most existing types all the processes stand directly upwards, or they are directed slightly backwards at their free tips. There is a very primitive plan, seen in many Reptiles, both living and extinct, as well as in some existing and many extinct Mammals, in which the vertebra to which the pelvic girdle is united forms a definite landmark by possessing an upright spinous process. All the vertebrae in front of this one may have their spines directed slightly back- wards towards it, or with some variation displayed in the forward spines, uprightness is again found in the spine of this pelvic or sacral vertebra. In many extinct reptilian forms the only truly upright " spine is at the pelvis. In the Gavial some ten anterior spines point backwards, about nine are upright, and five are directed slightly forwards. In the modern Nilotic Crocodile some seventeen anterior spines are directed backwards, the last rib-bearing vertebra having an erect spine, and being followed by some five elements in which the spines are directed slightly forwards; and after that comes the pelvic region with an upright spine again. The upright spine of the pelvic vertebra of the Reptiles entitles this vertebra especially to the distinctive name of anticlinal vertebra. This may be the only spine in the whole vertebral column which does not slope, but we THE SPLNOUS PROCESSES 103 have already seen that in the Crocodile (and in some other existing Reptiles) another upright spine is beginning to be evident at the hind end of the rib series, and this is the one to which the term anticlinal vertebra is usually applied in mammalian anatomy. Within the limits of the Mammalia, the condition of the trend of the spinous processes varies enormously. Among the Prototheria, Echidna and Proechidna show a series of cervical, dorsal, and lumbar spines which point uniformly backwards towards the sacral region (see Fig. 35). This is apparently the primitive mammalian FlG. 35. DlAGBAM OF THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN OF AN ANIMAL IN WHICH ALL THE SPINOUS PROCESSES ARE KETRO VERTED. as well as the primitive reptilian condition, and, as such, is seen in an extraordinarily varied collection of extinct species embracing such forms as Toxodon, Arsinotherium, Mylodon, etc. In Ornithordhynchus, there is a change, for though all the cervical and dorsal spines slope acutely backwards, those of the three lumbar vertebrae slope forwards, there being an anticlinal element at the hind end of the rib-bearing series. In the Metatheria and Eutheria, the very widest divergence in spinal inclination is seen, and it seems most probable that some functional demand determines the variations met with. Owen paid attention to this point, and recognized clearly the 104 ARBOREAL MAN underlying cause of the variations. Some fifty years ago Paul Topinard dealt partially with this problem, which had previously engaged the attention of Paul Broca. But these two authors considered little more than the end of the story, for they took most note of those changes which have taken place in so short a chapter as that comprised in the study of the higher Primates and Man. It is, however, necessary to embrace far more than this in the study of what Topinard termed " anteversion and retro version " of the spinous processes. If we take the skeleton of such a well-known animal as the dog it is at once apparent that the spines of the cervical and most of the dorsal vertebrae are " retroverted," that the penultimate dorsal vertebra is " anticlinal," and the two last dorsal and all the lumbar vertebrae have spines that are " anteverted," another upright spinous process ap- pearing on the sacrum. The anticlinal vertebra which is situated, in the dog, near the end of the dorsal, or rib- bearing, series has also been termed the region of the " centre of motion " ; and it is easy to realize, in watching a greyhound looping along, that this is a perfectly well justified term. The anticlinal vertebra indicates that the animal possessing it has the power of bending its vertebral column as a spring is bent, and that the apex of the bend is situated at this particular point. The presence of such a vertebra in the backbone, whether of a recent animal or a fossil, shows clearly that the animal could flex and extend its vertebral column about this central point, and that its spine could be bent, and could be straightened out again as a spring in the ordinary activities of the animal (see Fig. 36). These things are clear enough when we look at the skeleton of a dog, or a hare, and weave into the bones the picture of the animal laying itself out, and doubling itself up, as it goes at full speed. But there is, as we have seen, another condition — that seen in some primitive Reptiles and Mammals — in which the anticlinal vertebra is situated, not in the THE SPINOUS PROCESSES 105 middle of the back, but at the point where the legs and pelvis hinge upon the spine, at the junction of tail and body. In these animals the mechanism of spinal move- ments is obviously of a different nature, and a whole series of correlated anatomical details makes it clear that no spring-like bending of the backbone takes place at or FIG. 36. — DRAGRAM OF THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN OF AN ANIMAL. IN WHICH THE SPINOUS PROCESSES ARE ANTEVERTED AND EETROVERTED TO A DEFINITE CENTRE OF MOVEMENT. near its mid-point. But the pelvic anticlinal vertebra is a true centre of movement in animals built upon this type. Towards the fixed pelvic girdle the head and neck and the whole of the trunk may be pulled, and raised, as the arm of a crane; towards the same fixed point the usually elongated tail may be similarly pulled up. This is a simple and primitive anatomical plan, and it is adapted to simple and primitive types of movement. The range of body movements possible with this plan of arrangement of spinous processes and their associated muscles would appear to comprise such actions as crawl- ing, waddling, shuffling, that type of running best termed ambling, and simple aquatic paddling. In all these actions there is no regional bending of the vertebral column, no centre of movement save that situated at the point above the hips. This is the mechan- ism, and these are the movements of most of the existing 106 ARBOREAL MAN limbed Reptiles; the same type of movement, we may fairly hazard, was characteristic of the extinct gigantic forms of which the bony evidences of the mechanism are so clearly preserved. Among the plastic Mammals, the evidence of function is very easily seen. Animals which hop, jump, spring, leap, or gallop show the presence of well-marked ante- version and retroversion of the spinous processes. Nearly all Rodents and Insectivores possess this feature. Of the Carnivora, the cats which spring, and the dogs which leap and gallop, have a strongly divided series of spinous processes, while the shuffling bears show a vertebral column of which all the spines anterior to the sacrum are directed backwards. Leaping and galloping Ungu- lates, which can use both fore-limbs and both hind-limbs alternately in their full stride, provide the classical example of the anticlinal spinous process at the pen- ultimate rib-bearing vertebra. Some very striking ex- ceptions are worth noticing among the Ungulates. We have already called attention to the curious gait of the Giraffe, which in quiet progression advances both limbs of the same side at the same time. It is interesting to find that in this animal all the cervical, dorsal, and lumbar spinous processes slope backwards — there is no centre of movement until the region of the hips is reached. I should imagine that, even when hard pressed, a Giraffe cannot break into a gallop, and that it possesses little or no power of jumping, but I know of no authoritative observations upon these points. The spinous processes of Okapia are arranged upon the same simple plan, and I presume that it possesses the same peculiar gait, and the same probable limitations of activity as the Giraffe. It is not surprising that the lumbering Elephant, with its peculiarly rigid backbone, should have no dorsal centre of movement, and no anticlinal vertebra, and the same feature is shared by such simple paddlers as the Sirenia. THE SPINOUS PROCESSES 107 It would take us too far aside from our present purpose to discuss the question, but we may note the observation that, judging by such skeletal remains as have been preserved, the Mammals, at an early period of their history, were represented by an extraordinary number of forms the gait of which we may presume to have been but little better than a simple reptilian shuffle. The active galloping and springing animals are their changed and modern representatives. In the case of arboreal animals the problem is ap- parently complicated at the outset by the fact that, while some perfected tree-climbers show a highly special- ized series of anteverted and retroverted spines, separated by a well-marked anticlinal vertebra, others, none the less well fitted for a thoroughly arboreal life, have a series of uniformly directed spines, all being retroverted (even if only slightly so) towards the pelvis. It is easy to furnish a satisfactory explanation for these differences by appealing to the varied, and perfectly distinctive, methods of tree-climbing adopted by different arboreal animals, but it is by no means easy to determine what may be the relation of these two forms to each other. Either type (the divided, or the uniform spinous series) might be primitive in the tree-climbers, and the one might subsequently be derived from the other by altera- tion of function as displayed in climbing methods. Again, both types may have been definite legacies in arboreal animals derived from differently constructed primitive stocks; both may have been inherited types with which the animals took to an arboreal life, and on which they have moulded their arboreal activities. Or, both of these alternative factors may be in action, when we regard the whole wide range of arboreal Mammals. It seems not unlikely that this last supposition is true. Taking a group of animals so perfectly arboreal as the Edentate Sloths of South America (Brady podidce), we see, combined with a very peculiar fashion of arboreal 108 ARBOREAL MAN activity, a vertebral column possessing a uniformly sloping series of spinous processes. The question t hat- presents itself is, Does this spinal arrangement represent the inherited handicap of these arboreal animals, an ancestral birthright which has determined and limited their peculiar climbing habits ; or have their individualities as tree-clingers modified a spinal column which may at one time have possessed the doubly sloping series of spines indicative of greater activity ? The present-day arboreal Sloths possess a backbone of the lumbering- terrestrial walkers. Are they derived from a lumbering - walking stock of which some of the smaller, lighter members ha^e taken to the trees and become lumbering tree-clingers, since that was the limit of their arboreal possibilities ? The evidence of paleontology certainly points towards the last conclusion as being nearer the truth. The extinct relations of the Sloths are well known. On the strength of the evidence afforded by Megatherium, Mylodon, and other well-studied gigantic fossil Edentates, it seems justifiable to regard the modern Sloths as diminu- tive descendants of lumbering animals, and to look upon their restricted arboreal activities as the necessary result of their ancestry. We may assume the correctness of Owen's conclusion that Mylodon robustus reared itself against the trees in tripod fashion, and pulling down the branches, browsed upon their leaves. From such a beginning we would picture some smaller members of the same stock going farther than this, and clinging to the branches in their search for food; and in this manner we would picture the Sloths becoming arboreal. Even when they had reached the tree-tops, and had definitely made their homes among them, they were still limited by the handicap which their ancestral terrestrial shuffling gait had imposed upon them; and though no animals are more thoroughly arboreal than the existing THE SPINOUS PROCESSES 109 Sloths, it cannot be said that their arboreal activities, although distinctive enough, tend to lead far in the struggle of evolution. If this be the true history of the arboreal Bradypodidce, it would seem to be one not easily applied to the origin of the arboreal Primate stock. No lumbering gait, or mere clinging to branches, seems to have led them to the tree-tops; and, indeed, as we have seen in a previous section, an early acquired mammalian activity appears the most probable factor in bringing about the enterprise. Taken as a whole, the Primates show a distinctly retro- verted and anteverted series of dorso-lumbar spinous processes, the two sets being separated by an anticlinal vertebra marking a centre of movement, which is very obvious in the arboreal activities of most monkeys. The same conditions are present in most members of the Insectivora. Among the Menotyphlidce, the Oriental Tree Shrews (Tupaiadce), which are deserving of especial notice, have twelve ribs, the spines of the vertebrae anterior to the tenth dorsal slope backwards, the tenth or eleventh is upright, and the nine posterior spines slope forwards. These are active arboreal creatures jumping from branch to branch, and having a very definite centre of movement at the hind end of the thoracic region (see Fig. 37). There are many reasons for supposing that, in some such form as a primitive tree-haunting Insectivore, a picture of an earlier stage of the Primate phylum is to be seen most perfectly among living Mammals. Some exceedingly primitive form, of which a very much elabo- rated modern evolution may be seen in the existing Tupaiadce, probably pioneered the Primate stock in the conquest of the branches; this pioneer form was, in all probability, a small active animal, perhaps with the commencing possession of a centre of movement situated at the hinder end of the thoracic vertebrae. Great interest centres round the Lemurs in the study 110 ARBOREAL MAN FIG. 37. — A TYPICAL TREE SHREW. ADULT FEMALE OF Tupaia ferruginea. From a spirit specimen. THE SPINOUS PROCESSES ill of the disposition of the spinous processes. In this feature the majority of them follow the Tree Shrews, and those that are characterized by special activity present a remarkably double -sloped series of spines. Some Lemurs might almost be called arboreal jumpers, and among them the Bornean Tarsius and the African Galagos are most prominent ; in these animals the forward slope of the lumbar spines is particularly acute. But with some other Lemurs the most puzzling feature of the , problem is introduced, for Nycticebus, as a type of the Asiatic Slow Lemurs, presents a series of spines as uni- formly retroverted as that seen in the Sloths themselves. Some confusion between the Sloths and Slow Lemurs has, in bygone days, been a stumbling-block in systematic zoology. Is this similiarity of the backbone another feature which might cause the animals to be confounded and is it one that might point to any real philogenetic affinity in the stocks of the Slow Lemurs and the Sloths ? In this feature we have seen some reason for believing that Sloths were derived from a lumbering terrestrial stock, and it may fairly be asked if the same reasoning should not apply to the case of Nycticebus. We have pictured the stock of the Lemurs as arising most probably from a small active animal; are we to regard the Slow Lemurs as having a different origin ? Probably the correct answer is that the Slow Lemurs show so many points of affinity with the rest of the Lemurs that they can only be regarded as altered members of the same stock. " Although they vary considerably in structure from the more typical Lemurs, there can be no doubt that the Slow Lemurs possess a true Lemurine structure in many important particulars, so that they must have had a common origin with the true Lemurs " (Sclater). We are bound, therefore, by our present limitations of knowledge to regard this as a case of con- vergence. We have previously noted the peculiarities of the arboreal habits of Nycticebus. It is a tree-clinger 112 ARBOREAL MAN more nearly than a true tree-climber, and moreover it shows a definite tendency to carry out its arboreal activities in an inverted position. It is therefore to be presumed that the adoption of this habit has led to a modification of its erector spinse muscle and its spinous processes, and that by its slothful habits Nycticebus has, in this respect, arrived at the state to which the Edentate Sloths were bound by their inherited disabilities. The case of the Slow Lemurs is all the more interesting since the absence of a dorso-lumbar centre of movement, and the presence of a practically uniform series of spines, are seen in another group of arboreal Primates. Nyctice- bus does not leap from branch to branch, it takes no spring from its hind-limbs, it does not jump to its next arboreal station, but reaches out for it and grasps it, and upon the ground it crawls and shuffles along. Now, much the same conditions are seen in the Anthropoids. The Giant Apes, though active enough and expert climbers, do not spring from their hind-limbs, or leap about the brandies as the smaller monkeys do. Wallace has described the Orang-utan in its natural state as " moving slowly along, hanging from the branches by its arms," and as " moving along a large limb of a tree in a semi-erect posture." Both these modes of progression are typical of the An- thropoids; the first, according to Wallace, is unusual in Simla satyrus, but it is the one which is characteristic of the smaller agile Anthropoids known as the Gibbons (Hylobates). The Chimpanzee adopts the same methods of climbing, methods which involve a semi-erect foot balance com- bined with a dependence upon a powerful hand grasp. More rapid translation from branch to branch, or from tree to tree, is not performed by a spring from the resting feet, but by a swing from the grasping hands. A group of monkeys passing from tree to tree in the jungle will jump those gaps where branches fail to meet, but a party of Gibbons will swing themselves across the gap, releasing THE SPINOUS PROCESSES 113 one hand-grasp only to gain another. It is in this fashion that human performers on the high trapeze pass from one swinging bar to another. It is this factor, a purely arboreal one, that has led to the typical condition of the anthropoid vertebral column, and determined the disposition of its muscles and the arrangement of its bony prominences. The springing point in the middle of the backbone is absent, and the column acts as a whole; its spines are in uniform series, and -its accompanying muscles support it as a pillar, rather than bend it as a spring. There is nothing in this that is peculiar to Man, nothing that has any relation to the attainment of any distinctive human attribute; it was among the branches, as an outcome of the arboreal life, that the uniformly sloping series of spinous processes, seen in the human vertebral column, was attained. Among the Anthropoids themselves some minor varia- tions are seen in the disposition of the spinous processes. In the Gibbons the series is quite uniform, but in the large Anthropoids the spines in the cervical region are peculiarly elongated. More than this, in the Gorilla the spine of the third cervical vertebra is strongly anteverted, and at times the fourth and fifth share in a slight forward slope. Again, at the hind end of the series some varia- bility is seen, for some of the posterior spines are not distinctly retroverted. In Man this variability in the posterior spines is also present, for the lumbar spinous processes do not always slope in quite the same manner. In some primitive human races there is even a tendency to anteversion in the posterior spines, which shows itself at times quite distinctly in the first sacral vertebra. CHAPTER XVIII THE POISE OF THE HEAD AND THE CURVES OF THE SPINE THE differences seen in the disposition of the cervical spinous processes in the Anthropoids and in Man are due to, and involve, yet another factor which may be termed the poise of the head upon the vertebral column. This subject has been so fully investigated by com- parative anatomists that little need be said here con- cerning it. The skull is hinged to the foremost vertebra by its two condyles, and between these occipital condyles and the articulating surfaces of the first vertebra the human movement of nodding the head to and fro takes place. The position of the two condyles relatively to other anatomical features of the skull varies enormously in animals adopting different life postures. The condyles may be situated right at the hinder end of the skull, they may be just beneath the hind end, or they may be situated some distance forward along its base. In pronograde quadrupedal animals, such as the dog, the head is jointed to the vertebral column by condyles situated at the extreme hind end of the skull; the nose is directed forwards in line with the vertebral column, and the skull is braced in position by a strong ligament — the ligamentum nuchae — and by muscles passing from the vertebrae to the back of the cranium (see Fig. 38). In animals which are not purely pronograde quadrupeds, an alteration takes place; the poise of the head becomes changed and the site of the condyles shifts upon the skull. In arboreal animals this change becomes very evident, in THE POISE OF THE HEAD 115 for with the body held even partially, and only occasion- ally upright, the eyes and face still need to be directed forwards, and an angle is introduced between the long FIG. 38. — BASE OP THE SKULL OF A DOG. This and the following three figures are drawn with the diopto- graph from skulls which are orientated strictly in the same plane. The relative positions of the condyles are therefore directly comparable in the series of drawings. axis of the skull and face, and the long axis of the vertebral column. This angle can be produced, as occasion de- mands, in the articulations of an ordinary quadruped. 116 ARBOREAL MAN In the normal method of progression a dog carries its head nearly in line with its vertebral column, but when it sits up to beg it bends its head and neck so that its eyes and face are still direpted forwards, and the head becomes almost at right angles to the axis of its vertebral column. This position becomes' habitual in the arboreal FIG. 39. — BASE OF THE SKULL OF A BABOON (Cynocephalus). Primates, for hi them the trunk has so frequently to be more or less upright, and in proportion to the permanency of this position there comes about a shifting of the site of the condyles. Posture alone determines this change, for the more quadrupedal Baboons (Cynocephalus) do not share so fully in this feature, which is so characteristic of their truly arboreal allies (see Fig. 39). In most monkeys the occipital condyles are situated well forward upon the THE POISE OF THE HEAD 117 base of the skull, and in the Anthropoids they are still further forward. In Man the head is practically balanced upon the first cervical vertebra (see Figs. 40 and 41). The general factor which underlies this forward migra- tion of the condyles is involved early in arboreal life, and it is one that proceeds far in animals that are still purely FIG. 40. — BASE OF THE SKULL OF A MONKEY (Cercopithecus). arboreal. The final changes which have taken placejin Man might be ranked among the finishing touches of human development, for they consist, not so much in any further forward migration of the site of the condyles, as in the culmination of that other process which we have termed the recession of the snout region. In the giant Anthropoids the head itself has already attained 118 ARBOREAL MAN all the essentials of the human poise, but the preponder- ately large face and jaws, in the adult Gorilla especially, demand for their proper balance a large muscular leverage applied to the back of the head. It is this muscle mass which gives these animals their apparently short bull- FIG. 41. — BASE OF THE HUMAN SKULL. necks, and which, acting from the spinous processes of the cervical vertebrae, elongates these processes and pulls them towards the skull. The poise of the skull, and the forward migration of the occipital condyles and foramen magnum, are arboreal features. Finishing touches have been put upon the THE POISE OF THE HEAD 119 human condition by the final phases of the recession of the snout region. With the question of the curves of the vertebral column we need deal but briefly, for the subject is one which finds ample discussion in every work upon anthropology. In pronograde quadrupeds the backbone rises as one long, low-pitched arch from the point where it is sup- ported by the fore-limb, to a maximum in the dorso-. lumbar region, and then falls again to the point where it is supported by the hind-limbs. The weight of the trunk is carried from an arch which is supported upon pillars (limbs) at its two extremities. It is this arch which in some animals has a springing point at its centre. In front of the anterior supporting pillar the spine bends up again for the carriage of the head. This time the arch is reversed, for while the curve of the back is convex upon its dorsal side, the curve of the neck is convex ventrally. Again, behind the posterior supporting pillar the spine is also bent upwards ; here, at the sacro-vertebral angle, the bending dorsalwards is more acute; but from this point, the curve is slightly downwards once more, the posterior or sacral arch being like the dorsal arch in miniature, but generally still more flattened (see Figs. 35 and 36). In arboreal animals these curves are also well marked, and the changes which they undergo are quite definite. Arboreal uprightness, in the sense of the assumption of a sitting posture, has a well-marked influence upon the primitive curves. Some monkeys, as they sit up, spend the greater part of their time with the trunk supported vertical upon their ischial prominences, and in these animals the dorso-lumbar curve tends to be, not one long pitch as in the quadrupeds, but an arch subdivided into an anterior sharper curve over the thoracic part of the body, and a more gradual curve over the abdominal part. The dorso-lumbar curve tends to be concentrated as a dorsal curve, while the lumbar region is scarcely 120 ARBOREAL MAN arched at all. This is, of course, merely an adaptation to posture, and as such it is seen in other, and nonr arboreal, animals which tend to carry the trunk axis vertical, no matter what may be the relation of the hind- limb to the trunk. A flattened lumbar region is present in the Kangaroos (Macropus), and it is the same in the Jerboas (Dipus), which hop with the trunk axis nearly vertical. Arboreal life brought about a lumbar flattening early, since trunk uprightness is an easily attained out- come of the climbing habit, but it also — in the Anthropoid Apes — carried it a stage further than this. A lumbar flattening suffices for an animal which holds its trunk upright upon the basis of its flexed lower limbs, and it suffices for animals which sit and hop upright. , It will not suffice, however, when the trunk uprightness , has to be combined with extended lower limbs. If an animal is to maintain its trunk and its lower limbs in one continuous axis, something more than a lumbar flattening is required, and a reversed lumbar curve is introduced. In most monkeys the reversed^ lumbar curve is already present in some slight degree. In Cercopithecus palatinus it is perfectly definite, and the same may be said for all thoroughly arboreal monkeys, when the vertebral column is examined in its natural state; but the curvature dis- appears altogether in the skeleton (sec Fig. 42). The reason for this is that the curvature is caused by the shaping of the soft intervertebral discs, rather than by any change in the bones themselves, and when these discs are lost in the preparation of the skeleton, the presence of the curves is ignored in the subsequent mounting of the specimen. If our knowledge be derived from the actual animals, rather than from museum skeletons, we cannot deny that a lumbar curve convex forwards is already present in the monkeys. The straightening of the lower limb upon the trunk is an extremely important factor in primate evolution, and we will follow Professor Keith in regarding the habit of THE POISE OF THE HEAD 121 hjind suspension, seeri in the Gibbons, as the agent which made it a definite possession of the Anthropoids. As the Gibbon travels about among the branches, its trunk and FIG. 42. — SECTION OF THE HINDER PART OF THE BODY OF A MONKEY (Cercopithecus palatinus), TO SHOW THE INCIPIENT FORWARD CURVE IN THE LUMBAR REGION OF THE SPINE. hind-limbs are dependent while it swings with its long arms from branch to branch. The body and leg axis is straightened almost as much as it is in upright walking Man. The Gibbons show a curvature hi the lumbar 122 ARBOREAL MAN region, the convexity of which is directed forwards and which is better marked than the same curve in any monkey. In the Gibbons the bones themselves have begun to share in the change, and the curvature is evident in the dried skeleton. This lumbar curve is present with PIG. 43. — THE NORMAL CURVES OF A HUMAN VERTEBRAL COLUMN AS SEEN IN A SECTION THROUGH AN UPRIGHT BODY. an ever-increasing perfection through the Giant Apes to the lower, and finally to the higher, races of mankind (see Fig. 43). No doubt it is a feature which is called into being by the erectness of the trunk upon the lower limbs, but it must not be regarded as a feature stamped upon the human frame by terrestrial bipedal orthograde habits; it was begot among the branches, it led to greater possi- bilities, and only its finishing touches were put on by upright walking upon the surface of the earth. CHAPTER XIX THE PELVIS AND THE VISCERA THE arboreal alteration of body poise makes itself felt in other skeletal and visceral features than those related solely to the backbone and the skull; for, at the other end of the vertebral column, the pelvis undergoes marked changes in arboreal life. The primitive pelvis, such as the earliest Mammals inherited, is a very definite structure articulated in a very definite manner, and in all essentials it is of the same type as that seen in the generalized Reptiles both living and extinct. Such a primitive pelvis consists of two lateral halves, each half being composed of three elements : one a dorsal element, articulating with the vertebral column, and the other two, which are ventral elements, articulating with each other in the middle line of the ventral surface of the body. The dorsal element (ilium) articulates with the vertebra] column at the sacrum, over a sacro-iliac joint surface which involves both the rib element (pleurapo- physis] and the transverse process element (diapophysis), which enter into the formation of the sacrum. The two ventral elements articulate at an elongated symphysis, which involves both bones (pubis and ischium), and is therefore an ischio-pubic symphysis. These types of sacro-iliac and ischio-pubic joints are characteristic of quadrupedal animals that have four equally developed supporting limbs, and they are obviously dependent upon the mechanical demands for supporting the body upon the limbs in pronograde animals. With a change of body poise, an alteration in pelvic architecture, to meet 123 124 ARBOREAL MAN the new conditions, is evidenced in a wide series of vertebrate forms, and, with an exchange of pronograde quadrupedal progression for arboreal uprightness, the pelvis becomes greatly modified. In a simple mechanical way we may regard the sacrum of the pronograde as slung between the two ilia, slung from two separate points of suspension, the one on its costal portion (pleura- pophysis), and the other on its transverse process element FIG. 44. — PURELY DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE PELVIS OF A THOROUGHLY QUADRUPEDAL MAMMAL. Note the way in which the sacrum is articulated with the ilia at the sacro-iliac joint, and the meeting of the pubes and ischia at the ischio -pubic symphysis. (diapophysis). The visceral weight is supported upon an elongated ventral symphysis, which constitutes only one element in the supporting developments of the structures in the mid-ventral line of the body. Such a pelvis tends to be narrow from side to side, but elongated in its dorsi- ventral axis. With the assumption (even to a partial extent) of arboreal uprightness of the body axis, the body weight tends to be disposed round the vertebral column as round a vertical pillar, rather than to be slung from it as from a horizontal pole; and now the sacrum tends to be wedged between the two iliac bones, as the keystone of an arch disposed in a cranio-caudal rather THE PELVIS AND THE VISCERA 125 than in a dorsi- ventral direction. This change produces an effect upon the sacro-iliac joint that we may sum up by saying that an elongated dorsi-ventral contact area becomes unnecessary, and is gradually replaced by an elongated cranio-caudal contact area. Although there are some exceptions and irregularities in the application of this principle to the pelves of existing Mammals, still the exceptions are capable of explanation and do not detract from the general rule that with a change from quadrupedal to bipedal progression more sacral vertebrae enter into the formation of the joint, but less of the dorsi-ventral area of each vertebra is engaged by the ilia. A common type of sacro-iliac joint, in purely jprono grade quadrupedal Mammals, is that in which but one sacral element is articulated with the ilia; and this one element is sunk deep between the two ilia, so that the joint surface involves the whole of its dorsi-ventral area, engaging both pleurapophysis and diapophysis elements which are represented in this area. In most of the Lemurs one whole sacral element, and from a quarter to a half of the next caudal element, are engaged in the sacro-iliac joint. In many New-World Monkeys the condition is the same, and in both cases these elements are deeply sunk between the ilia, so that the diapophyses are articular. In the Baboons one whole element, and three-quarters of another, are engaged. In most Old- World Monkeys nearly the whole of two sacral elements enter into the articulation, and the same condition is present in the pelvis of the upright Indris among the Lemurs. In the Anthropoids from two and a half to three sacral elements~are involved, but the condition is subject to a considerable degree of variation in different individuals. In the Gibbons (Hylobates lar) nearly the whole of three elemenfsTs articular, and the articulation involves both pleurapophysis and diapophysis of the sacral vertebrae. In the Orang-utan the articulation 126 ARBOREAL MAN varies ; it may involve no more than the best part of two sacral vertebrae, or nearly the whole of three may enter into the joint. But the diapophyses of only two of the sacral vertebrae are, as a rule, involved. In both the Gorilla and the Chimpanzee the joint surface occupies from two and a half to three sacral vertebrae, but involves the diapophysis of only two elements. In Man the greatest variation is sexual, and the female articulation, as a rule, comprises only two or two and a half sacral vertebrae, while that of the male embraces from two and a half to three. In any case, an articulation evolving a diapophyseal element is a somewhat uncommon human anomaly. It would therefore seem that the sacrum is being received between the ilia in a greater proportion of its length, but is freeing itself from articulation in some portion of its depth by (if it may be expressed thus) liberating its dorsal surface from joint contact with the ilia. Hand in hand with this alteration of the sacro-iliac joint a change is proceeding in the ventral symphysis. This change may best be summed up by saying that the symphysial area becomes shortened progressively in the transition -from pronograde poise to arboreal orthograde habit. The symphysis, which is first of all an ischio- pubic union in the mid-line, becomes opened from its caudal aspect, and more and more of the ischia are freed from the ventral union. By gradual stages the whole length of the ischia becomes liberated from the symphysis, and the two bones are splayed aside from each other. Next, the pubes share in the process, and from the condi- tion of a true pubic symphysis, in which the whole of the ventral ends of the pubic bones are involved, there is developed the pubic symphysis typical of Man,, in which only about a half of the ventral ends of the pubes enter into the articulation. That this is an outcome of the modified method of THE PELVIS AND THE VISCERA 127 supporting the body weight is not to be doubted, despite some apparent contradictions, and it is to be remarked that in animals in which the body weight is not borne at all upon the hind-limbs (as in the Bats, etc.) no portion of the pelvic girdle meets in the mid-ventral line, and consequently no symphysis is developed. FIG. 45. — PURELY DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE PELVIS OF AN ORTHOGRADE MAMMAL. Note the way in which the sacrum articulates with the ilia at the sacro-iliac joint, and the meeting of only a small area of the pubes at the pubic symphysis. The pelvis has now, in its altered relation to the hind- limb, an entirely .different mechanical design. There is a main weight-supporting arch behind, composed of the ilia, with the sacrum as the keystone of this arch. A subsidiary weight-suppoT^mg'afch~is~Heveloped in front, and this is represented by the subpubic arch. The old ventro-dorsal weight-supporting arch is superseded, and now the cavity of the pelvis need no longer be moulded 128 ARBOREAL MAN in an elongated form from back to front ; it rather becomes rounded, or even broadened from side to side. T hese changes in the bony architecture of the pelvic girdle lead naturally to changes in the disposition of the viscera most intimately related to the pelvis. In particular the splaying open of the hinder end of the symphysis produces A B. FIG. 46. — DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF (A) PRIMITIVE MAMMALIAN AND (B) HUMAN TYPE OF VENTRAL SYM- PHYSIS. marked alterations in the visceral outlets, since the perineum shares in the changes. The form of the ex- ternal genitalia in both sexes becomes modified by this opening movement of the symphysis; and the external reproductive orifices become situated beneath the pubic arch, instead of occupying the hind end of an elongated pelvic tunnel. The internal organs also become pro- foundly modified, and those channels which connect the hollow viscera with the surface of the body become abbreviated with the outfolding of the hind end of the symphysis. Other visceral changes come about hand in hand with this pelvic adaptation, and this for the reason that both are the results of the altered poise in arboreal activities. As the body axis becomes increasingly upright, the disposition of the viscera within the body cavities imdergoes a purely mechanical alteration. It may be said that the method of packing the organs in the cavities is changed, simply for convenience, as the THE PELVIS AND THE VISCERA 129 axis of the cavities becomes modified. Since most of the organs are suspended from the walls of the cavities it is this method of suspension which naturally becomes FIG. 47. — MEDIAN SECTION OF A YOUNG FEMALE PIG, TO SHOW THE RELATION OF THE VENTRAL SYMPHYSIS (V.S.) TO THE VISCERA. FIG. 48. — MEDIAN SECTION OF A FULL-TERM HUMAN FEMALE FOETUS, TO SHOW THE RELATION OF THE VENTRAL SYM- PHYSIS (V.S.) TO THE VISCERA. most markedly affected. Briefly, we may say that when the trunk axis becomes more upright, all the viscera tend to sink towards the hind end of the body, and they tend to be suspended from the head end of the cavities rather than from the dorsal aspect. There is no need to describe 9 130 ARBOREAL MAN these changes in any detail, since almost every individual manifestation of them that is especially well marked in Man has been seized upon as an example of the alterations due to his orthograde bipedal habits, and, as a conse- quence, the subject has received sufficient attention in the literature of physical anthropology. The heart comes to be suspended from the cephalic end of the thorax, rather than from its dorsal side, and so it rests upon the upper surface of the diaphragm, rather than upon the anterior wall of the chest. Changes in the disposition of the lungs follow harmoniously this read- justment of the position of the heart. In the abdominal cavity the same general effects are seen. The viscera sink backwards. The liver is sus- pended more strongly from the lower surface of the diaphragm, and the intestines obtain attachments which sling them from the upper part of the cavity, as well as from its dorsal wall. All these things are adjustments to trunk uprightness — that trunk uprightness which is early brought about in arboreal life — and, as such, they make their appearance long before the stage at which Man walked upright upon his two feet ; for it must never be forgotten that the trunk of an animal which climbs up a tree, or sits upon a branch, is just as upright as is that of a Man standing erect. As far as concerns the abdominal and thoracic viscera, a man is as upright when he sits as when he stands, and an arboreal animal which sits and climbs among the branches is in a like case. The upright poise of Man has been lauded as one of his greatest distinctions. This praise of human upright- ness has, without doubt, been carried to absurd extremes, so also has the tendency to ascribe to this same uprightness a multitude of human weaknesses and disabilities. This visceral uprightness is no new thing, the readjustment has been gradual, and some measure of it has been very long established. It is easy to overdo the praise of the poise. It is equally easy to overdo the condemnation of it as a cause of many human ills. CHAPTER XX THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM WE will not deal directly with that portion of the re- spiratory system which is concerned with the production of voice, since the factors underlying the changes produced in these structures are not those that bring about the modifications in the disposition of the organs purety concerned in breathing. Here we will only consider the effects produced upon the chest and lungs, and the method by which air is taken into the lungs. The alterations in the general shape of the chest, which have differentiated the human form from that seen in purely quadrupedal animals, are very well known, and are discussed in all works dealing with human morphology. These alterations are, as a rule, ascribed to the upright posture — and rightly; but, again, we must remember that the upright posture need not mean the erect walking posture, but may imply nothing more than mere arboreal uprightness. In brief, we may say that a typical quad- rupedal animal, such as a dog, is narrow-chested. Its breastbone marks the keel of a chest, deep from breast- bone to backbone, but narrow from side to side. An upright animal, on the other hand, tends to have a broad chest, the breastbone no longer protrudes as a keel, and the chest is shallow from breastbone to backbone, and broad from side to side. Man shows the extreme of this flaT^eHng~^f~the~