LIBRARY OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM Received Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from BHL-SIL-FEDLINK https://archive.org/details/arnoldiaarno_16 ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information VOLUME XIX 1959 PUBLISHED BY THE ARNOLD ARBORE'LUM JAMAICA PLAIN, MASSACHUSETTS Hr -'7 1 i Ji ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University V’'oLUME 19 MARCH 6, 1959 Numbers 1-2 THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM SPRAY SCHEDULE IN I'HE continuinor war against the insect and disease enemies of over 6,000 kinds of woody plants growing in the Arnold Arboretum, the battle lines have flexed and the battle methods and ammunition in the form of spray formulas are continually being modified. These changes have resulted not only from increased knowledge and experience with the spray materials, the introduction of new spray materials, and the timing of spray applications, but also with the desire to con- trol other insects. Sanitation by removal of dead plants and parts of plants which may serve as a breeding area for insect and disease organisms, is an important adjunct in the control of the pests of plants. 'Lhe ability of plants in good health and vigor to resist insect and disease attacks in many cases is well known; consequently, we try to keep our plants growing vigorously, thus helping in the battle against in- sects and diseases. Information for this spray schedule has been collected from many sources, es- pecially the Cornell University Departments of Entomology and Plant I\athology and the Shade free Laboratories of the Waltham Field Station of the University of Massachusetts. We have used most of the sprays in our pest-control program : a few we consider experimental until more results can be noted. Not all spravs are a[)plied each year and those used are not applied to all listed host plants each time; rather, we try to s{)ray to control a specific pest as tlie need occurs. d'his listing is not presented as necessarily the best sprays for control of these fiests, but it is a record of what we use to meet our insect and disease problems. I'he notes given are important. Special attention is called to those cases where a repetition of the spray isretjuired. 'I’o succeed in the continuing battle against in- sect and disease attacks on plants, three things are essential : ( 1 ) Apply the right spray. (2) Apply it profierly. (.S) Apply it at the proper time. Failure to meet any one of these prere<|uisites materially reduces the effectiveness of the spray. [ I ] iJBWAI ARNOLD ARBORETUM SPRAY SCHEDULE— 1959 Q) ^ CU 2 ^ > XJ O ^11 u . 3 O 3 o w S Cfl Cfl TO ® 5 O) TO Ph TO -< ^ 2 .£ cu ji >. Cfl c/2 ^ S S CO ^ — TO OI '5 c/2 A c/2 X) I - i; c a o O CO In >> rl 3 C CJ C3 SD ^ CJ C'S W O c/2 c/2 < O TO x: ^ g b >-| o a Q ^ C V. CO o 3 CO bO . O) TO £ a r*^ CO U > TJ P-i a -3 c/2 ^ o a ^ c/2 3 to: o g >* 5 TO Xi 1-1 to: a CO rQ a> o a o "to S u s 5 ■2 o H ^ CO 3 "to X bo a a ^ 3 3 x ■3 3 iS *-' ”5 3 g ^ ^ § o 3 O TO LO X CO ^ ^ i -HfM 3 ,-H CU a 3 CO (U ^ bo ccT § n CJ 3< a CA X TO X 'co .. 3 3 3 .2 £ TO L_| ;^Q gQ % CM -§ t: X TO +j a CO . 3 U U 3 O U X !-i TO 0 cc C ^ (U 3 1 I TO Q a Q 3 _w TO X ^ a rrt I ^ TO a 4-. 3 3 TO a 3, 3 M- ^ 3 -3 3 3 3 > - X CO TO CU •r; X - -3 9 3 ^ lU X O i CO CJ 3 CU bJO 2 Tf cO CU H Q Q X £ CO 3 £ I a a CO CU O - bO CO 3 g e a a 4-1 o o X c/2 CU 3 a 3 TO CU O £ ^ I w S [2] iao ^ u ^ 03 OJ — (U § .e CO ^_, re 3 cx 2 3 ‘u 2 3 CX re' re 3 3 X >% u 03 c u a re u. CO X3 2 're 3 £ 3 H 03 Q 03 u C 3 CJ LO C CM o u "re 3 bc Xi '-' re CT; 2 03 •r o £ E ^ Q. o -S « 8 ^ i 3 -a •£>§«> x; ^3 -■^ o LO ^ O o a; c ^ CO '2 ^ o 2 > ^ a <1^ 0 ^ c o) •=: > •£ 1 ^ 0^ c i* £ ii >> £ ^ dJ , "oT S 5 £ ^ x> >> taC •b 3 < N C/) O ^ o 03 o. ^ CO D 8 ^ u 03 „ > O 03 CO . x: 3 u X <13 c U M 03 o ^ U C/) 03 . C ^ CO 2 O 2 O . X CJ CJ Cm 03 3 03 |S 'S "o 3 X 03 tC a G CO o I .2 'C 2 u o 03 03 33 c o 03 i_ ^ <1^ re 3 i. a S g S 2 b E ”£ re £ >. < c/) £ « 'O M-l c o s 2 re o i2 03 « '2 3: ^ — o CVJ D. £ ^ § 2 S r re b 8 ^ c u ^ £ e 'O •5) ^ i S bi) H ^ .£ 03 03 03 re |.re 0> LO 03 ^ re' ^ H :a Q CM Q re _ vp 2 ^ ^ cx ^ s s ‘-' 03 03 CO ^3 X -a ^ ^ O 2 o CM cx O cx C u 3 03 03 3 O £ 03 > £ a « ..""3 0 3 2 S>, c 'c .S c ■"' ^£•22 ^ Mm C 03 re 9“ < 2 ;c5 £ •b ^ ^ - LO o LO b cx CM 2 • ^ , T3 CO 03 2 I iS 3 .— I CX 2 b 03 5 C re x £ ^ -3 C C 03 g C > prt > 2 o 2* 3 -3 •| '3 re 03 bO 03 03 c 3 X re . « na c re 3 8 ® I - -3 u CO C »M ^ £ ^ E re re o >> Li ■b re 3 ^3 c re 2 W re 3 3 2^8 re 03 b <22 re . ^ [••i] Hydraulic Spray Date Insect or Disease Host Plants per 1 00 Gals. Water Notes May 15 Lacebug Azalea, Pieris, 4 lbs. 25% malathion wet- Malathion preferred as it also controls to 25 Rhododendron table powder; or mites and aphids. 1 lb. 25% lindane wettable Spray undersides of leaves. c« s g § •S .2 o Ic -2 a § & a< b d cii £ ^ LO o oj a CO .2 X X ” CO LD •LI CO d O CJ ‘co d, CO u d o CO ^ D § § 2 .2 D Im D. D 'B -M 3 CC 3 CO ’co c I 0 £ •S D CC3 r_^ u r-' 1§ 2 ^ 1 ^ O CO CO a L) £ ., CJ o u c o o 3 . d 3 CO CO - « hS 2 tuO CO C 3 ^ 2 3 3 2 2 CO u CO - < 0) Lh 3 >-i 3 bJO c - ^ c ^ ^ S CO 2x3 s ^ Is 3 CO CO d c/5 d 3 U ■s I « izq CO oj 03 CO 3 d CO ccj 3 r 1 2 w S d u Uh 3 d CO . S 2 73 -M ^2 bo •= 3 O CO iM oj 2 ^ X 'b3 .2 3 cj LI L) .2 dj ^3 CO*" .2 3 3. ^ a LI c d X T3 d o ^ LI d ^ 2 O CO d ^ cu [-t j ^ I p ^ QJ O & 4-. >> a < o ^ c - S c ^ II ^ S! o LO u . cfl ~0 £ ^ Cvj a I s E ^ I o J >' ► cC .2 S S .£ ii c c/) c/T Q, F W (U r9 '-' U ns - w w o 3 :v j= T ^ -S •£ re o 1* u .- a> -1 X> 'X; 3 "O u h a X : s ^ re M 15 tn — OJ S a c JS "E .2 ^ I3 > o o .5 U ^ i 3 re ^ I i &.“= a; ^ W (U c £ 3 I- s _re o re - P aj m o Cvj D. I 3 ^ I re Lo g Tj* ■*-> I— I Q, ZJ C 3 ? D 3 - >. qj ^ “•e C« 2 O) n 3 CO 2 ^ re T3 D S d ™ 2 I 'B e ^ 3 (U a; ca a; cu cj >> 1^2 oil 0) ^ 5 o d > O d < cj^ re d; 3 d S 3 s » u O) 3 d( rrt ; O) .. ^ .3 U) ^ 3 U, O re I- X 2 (LI TJ ^ O LO d ^ 3 co' n £ 3 H Q ^ a! Q ^ ^ f ?.i LO ^ ^ CO 'P re -- o re d £ in o M CO >. ^ re c -03 CO 3 bO . 3 3 < -2 ^ £ (LI o d c . TJ c c o re 3 CO a re 3 CJ re _L- Cm 5 c^“ = 1 2 (/3 CO ‘p 2 u (LI re U Cm (LI I 2 cc u c ^ 3 o [•>] 15 u ^ d ai CO ^ (LI > '«■' ^ (LI ? -C -i^ ^ .£ re +_, iM d dl (U w cci 2 -a c 3 3 2 CO too 2 2 « L4 3 3 O s 2 re »M 3 . U re a 03 (V j=: 0 0 3 2 4_, re re re 3 ^ £ 03 LO O CM d CO ^ £ 3 re ■rt 4-1 dl V- 3 dl 2 3 (LI o E o < U >> ^ -a .12-2 CJ • dl (U CO d d 4M _ W re £ re o
  • ' 2 £ I Q. X ^ 3 dl H P 9 S Q dj ^3 LO CM £ M-‘ ^ 15 ”3 bfl g >-H d; bC p o 2 < Is II .re - u 2 a; £ & o CO (LI " -3 ^ 3 . £ P - d £ 3 C”* X5 CO 3 CO 2 ® (u 3 : - P ^ I V ^ O LO O "3 (^^ d 2 L« 2 vP 2 n ^ ” 2 CM -I-' ^ <3 •He C 3 a; o ^ c ® W cf) C o; .- w u cri O X! XJ oi 2i ^ CO Xi > M 5s 3 cO 2 C O QJ X x: H ^ c § ^ u M li ^ 3 ^ c rH ^ w c cn ^ o 3 ’3. H Wh 03 H c/3 X S X Q X Q CM CO Q 0 Q Cfl d 03 a 3 0 03 0 }-, 03 X X X 03 c/3 X CO c/3’ X X s cO 03 0 U CM a CO 0 CO bjo w 1 .2 ^ c« n- V a CL, ij C/5 cO (U S.H c C Cfl c3 P^ CL CL X C O CO 5 QJ CL 4^ O O W (/) c .2 rt u 3 O „ <1^
  • 5’ cO d Sr « s CM 3 C 03 O , 4_1 03 cO a >-' S' CL 03 C/5 X DC (-> LCl H S Q ^ 3 Q ^ ^ ^ a g S I X c/3 3 CO £ I g CM CL C .■!> c« 3 cO d ^ X X 03 X cj cO ^ ^ 52 < s c/3 frt CO Cfi 03 M CL biO cO 3 S ^ (D CH, i cd 6^0 < :i: Pi H Q Q CO ^ b X c CM 03 U C o u 3. (^J P O IS 2 S § b >1 .2 cO (j 01 a c« 03 3 bio >1 3 CO -M Ui -*-' CL ^ c« ^ ^ X biO _ d CO p a o -7^ ^ X ^ Pi H X 03 V c ■ o o X u X Cfl ^ 2 a 3 1^3 I g I a B 03 03 Cfl a 3 X 00 2 X 03 2 ^ X*" o X ^ ^ Sil O X X o Tt CL < CM a 3 s ^ gj 3 2 C5 'L' < 2 c/) [0] PESTS FREQUENTLY DESTRUCTIVE IN THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM Host Pest Spray Date Acer Cankerworm May 15-25 Aesculus Japanese beetle July 10-15 (with repeat) Amelanchier Lacebug June 1-10 (with repeat) Ampelopsis Japanese beetle July 10-15 (with repeat) Azalea (Rhododendron) Lacebug May 15-25 (with repeat) Mite or “Red Spider” May 15-25 Azalea bark scale July 10-15 (with repeat) Betula Birch leaf miner May 15-25 (with repeat) Buxus Boxwood leaf miner ) Boxwood psylla ) May 15-25 Mite or “Red Spider” ) Mealybugs May 15-25 (with repeat) Carya Cankerworm May 15-25 Catalpa Cankerworm May 15-25 Celastrus Euonymus scale March 1-April 20; June 1-10 Chaenomeles Oystershell scale ) March 1-April 20 San Jose scale ) Chamaecyparis Spruce mite or “Red Spider’ May 15-25 Cornus Dogwood twig borer June 10-Aug, 15 (with repeat) Cotoneaster Fire-blight May 1-10 (with repeat) Lacebug June 1-10 Crataegus Oystershell scale ) San Jose scale ) March 1-April 20 Cedar apple rust ) Fire-blight May 1-10 (with repeat) Leaf miner May 10-15 Dirca Euonymus scale March 1-April 20; June 1-10 Euonymus Euonymus scale March 1-April 20; June 1-10 Fagus Beech wooly aphid May 15-25 (with repeat) Fraxinus Oystershell scale March 1-April 20 Lilac borer May 1-10 (with repeat) Cankerworm May 15-25 Gleditsia Mite or “Red Spider” May 15-25 Hydrangea Japanese beetle July 10-15 (with repeat) [T] Host Pest Spray Date Ilex Holly leaf miner June 1-10 (with repeat) Juglans Cankerworm May 15-25 Juniperus Cedar apple rust March 1-April 20 Juniper scale March 1-April 20; May 15-25 (with repeat) Juniper web-worm May 1-10 Kalmia Kalmia leaf spot May 15-25 (with repeat) Larix Larch case-bearer May 15-25 Ligustrum Mealybugs May 15-25 (with repeat) Malus Oystershell scale ) Cedar apple rust ) March 1-April 20 Fire -blight May 1-10 (with repeat) Tent caterpillar May 1-10 Mite or “Red Spider” May 15-25 Flat-headed apple tree borer June 1-10 (with repeat) Metasequoia Japanese beetle July 10-15 (with repeat) Pachistima Euonymus scale June 1-10 (with repeat) Pachysandra Euonymus scale June 1-10 (with repeat) Picea Spruce gall aphid March 1-April 20 Spruce mite or “Red Spider” May 15-25 Pieris Lacebug May 15-25 (with repeat) Pinus Pine needle scale March 1-April 20 White pine weevil April 15-30 European pine shoot moth April 15-30; June 25-July 5 Pine bark aphid May 15-25 (with repeat) Platanus Anthracnose May 1-10 Populus Oystershell scale March 1-April 20 Prunus Oystershell scale March 1-April 20 Tent caterpillar May 1-10 Mite or “Red Spider” ) Cankerworm ) May 15-25 Peach tree borer July 10-15 (with repeat) Pyrus Oystershell scale March 1-April 20 Fire-blight May 1-10 (with repeat) Mite or “Red Spider” May 15-25 Quercus Golden oak scale March 1-April 20; July 15-25 Anthracnose May 1-10 [8] Host Pest Spray Date Quercus Mite or “Red Spider” ) May 15-25 Cankerworm ) Robinia Rosa Rosa rugosa Rhododendron Salix Sorbus Sassafras Syringa 1 Taxus Thuja Tilia Tsuga Ulmus Viburnum Locust twig borer Locust borer Powdery mildew Japanese beetle Flat-headed apple tree borer Lacebug Azalea bark scale Willow-leaf beetle Oystershell scale Fire-blight Flat-headed apple tree borer Japanese beetle Euonymus scale Oystershell scale Lilac borer Bacterial blight Cankerworm Mealybugs Black vine weevil Spruce mite or “Red Spider” Juniper scale Cankerworm Mite or “Red Spider” Japanese beetle Black vine weevil Elm bark beetle Elm leaf miner Elm leaf beetle Mite or “Red Spider” Cankerworm Dogwood twig borer May 25-June 30 (with repeat) Aug. 10-Sept. 30 (with repeat) May 15-25 (with repeat) July 10-15 (with repeat) June 1-10 (with repeat) May 15-25 (with repeat) July 10-15 (with repeat) May 15-25 March 1-April 20 May 1-10 (with repeat) June 1-10 (with repeat) July 10-15 (with repeat) ) March 1-April 20 ) ) May 1-10 (with repeat) ) May 15-25 May 15-25 (with repeat) June 20-30 May 15-25 May 15-25 (with repeat) ) May 15-25 ) July 10-15 (with repeat) June 20-30 April 15-30; June 25-July 5 ) ) May 15-25 ) ) June 10-Aug. 15 (with repeat) Vitis Japanese beetle July 10-15 (with repeat) Small Amounts of Spray Materials Estimating small amounts of spray materials from the amounts suggested in this schedule can be done in the following way : Use one level tablespoonful of a wettable powder to a gallon of water where the formula calls for one pound of the wettable powder to a hundred gallons of water; or use one level teaspoon- ful of liquid material per gallon where the formula calls for a pint of the liquid to a hundred gallons of water; ora level tablespoonful of liquid material per gal- lon where the formula calls for three pints per 100 gallons. Robert G. Williams REMINDER Arnoldia Subscriptions are now due and all notices were mailed in January. Those who have not yet sent in their 1959 subscriptions, please do so at once (price $2.00), mailing it to “Arnoldia,” Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain 30, Mass. Please make checks payable to Harvard University. Subscriptions for 1959 not paid by April 1 will be discontinued. r ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University V’^OLUME 19 APRIL 3, 1959 Number 3 THESE ARE THE FORSYTHIAS All forsythias have yellow flowers. All but three are vifjorous growing shrubs that are planted chiefly for their bright early-spring flowers. Some twenty- I nine species, varieties, and cultivars are being offered by American nurserymen. All but two of these are grown in the Arnold Arboretum, in addition to a few others. The busy plantsman need only be interested in seven or eight of them, although the “collector** or the individual who is striving for unusual effects may be interested in others. A study of this group over the years at the Arnold Arbo- retum, has indicated that the following are the best for general landscape use. Forsythia suspensa sieboldii: This is the first forsythia to be introduced into fmropean and American gardens; in Holland, in 1833; in England, about twenty years later; and in America, probably shortly thereafter. It is the form with the long, graceful, often procumbent branches that is sometimes seen planted at the edge of a wall where the long stems have an opportunity to hang down vertically for several feet. l*he stems root easily wherever they touch moist soil ; the flowers ] are a brilliant yellow (Nickerson Color Fan oV 9/l3 and about inches in I diameter. F. suspensa fortune!: I^rofessor Charles .S. Sargent said that the Arnold Arbo- ‘ return first introduced tliis to American gardens about 1878. 'Phis is the form with I gracefully arching branches, more upright in habit than .SiebolcUs forsythia, and j because it has been so [ropular so long, it is the form of F. suspensa which every- i one has cr)me to associate with this genus. I'he flowers are the same color as those j of Siebold’s, oidy slightly larger. ' 'I'here are other varieties of this species being grown in the .Arnold .Arboretum ( and being offered for sale by .American nurseymen. .All liave the gracefully- arching, sometimes often pr()cumbent, branching of these two. /•’. suspensa vari- i eties do not produce as many nor as large flowers as do the F. iniennedia varieties. I During the fifty and more years they have been grown, other varieties are takinir the place of these in many plantings, but the two mentioned could well be re- tained, especially for their habit. Many a gardener prefers these two for the very fact that they are more graceful and do not have such a mass of clustered flowers as the others. F. intermedia spectabilis: Commonly called the showy-border forsythia, this originated in the great Spaeth Nurseries of Berlin, in 1906; it was introduced into America by the Arnold Arboretum in 1908. It is still one of the most pop- ular of all, with flowers that are as vivid a yellow as the ^Beatrix Farrand’ only recently introduced. Being an F. intermedia variety, it is more upright and sturdy than F. suspensa^ the flowers are larger (about I5 inches) and are produced in greater quantity and in clusters. Some consider the color display is almost a “brassy” yellow, yet there are many who prefer it for just this reason. It is a darker yellow than the F. siispensa varieties (vivid yellow, 2.5Y 8.5/l.S of the Nickerson Color Fan) and with ‘Beatrix Farrand,’ can be classed as having the darkest yellow flowers of the entire group. ‘Beatrix Farrand’: This is a cross between a colchicine-induced tretraploid and F. ovafa, being a triploid, originating in the Arnold Arboretum in 1989 as a re- sult of the plant-breeding work of Dr. Karl Sax. The flowers are often as much as ‘2^ inches in diameter and, in certain situations, are slightly darker than those of F. intermedia spectabilis. It is upright and dense in habit, produces heavy bloom, and is becoming popular for its vivid yellow, conspicuous flowers. ‘Lynwood Gold’: This was originally found as a branch sport of F. intermedia spectabilis in a garden in Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, and was introduced by the Donard Nursery of Newcastle, County Down, Ireland. It was introduced into America in 1958 by the Gulf Stream Nursery of Wachapreague, Virginia, and is considered an improvement over F. intermedia spectabilis in that its flowers are more open and seem to be better distributed along the stem, that is, not so bunched. It, too, is a brilliant yellow, only minutely lighter in shade than F . intermedia spectabilis, is upright in habit, possibly a little stiff, but still most beauti- ful in flower. ‘Spring Glory’: A branch sport of another of the Arnold Arboretum’s intro- ductions {F. intermedia primuUna), this was found in the garden of Mr. H. H. Horvath, Mentor, Ohio, about 1930, and was introduced by the Wayside Gar- dens of Mentor, Ohio, about 1942. This and its parent, the primrose forsythia, have flowers that are a lighter yellow than the others, without being the objec- tionable greenish yellow of ‘Arnold Dwarf.’ It is an improvement over the once popular primrose forsythia, in that it has larger flowers (about two inches in diameter) and more of them, hence making a much better displa,v. Because of this, it may well replace the primrose forsythia in general landscape use. ‘Arnold Dwarf’: Resulting as a cross between F . intermedia and F. japonica made by Dr. Karl Sax in the Arnold Arboretum in 1941, this should never be planted for its flowers which are small and greenish yellow, and are produced [ i-G PLATE I I’op: Lf/t F. japotiica saxatilis l\i(/hf F. suspeiisa (brtuiitM C enter: Lf/l F. ovata Hight I*', suspeiisa sieholdii Bottom: Ijrft F. intermedia sjieetatiilis Right F. europaea Note tiie heavy clusters of flowers in some species and few clustered or single flowers in others, the former making; the more conspicuous display. sparsely. In fact, plants may be five or six years old before they produce any flowers at all. As a woody ground cover it is excellent, chiefly because of the fact that its procumbent branches root readily wherever they touch moist soil. A six-year-old plant may be only two to three feet tall but nearly seven feet across, and as it grows older, it may grow a few feet taller. However, if desired, this taller growth can be removed easily with brush scythe or pruning shears. Its ability to remain comparatively low and to spread regardless of the slope on which it is planted, are its chief merits. F. ovata: This should not be considered as one of the best forsythias in Hard- iness Zone 5 or in warmer areas, since the flowers are small and often are pro- duced erratically. However, in slightly colder areas, where the flower buds of the above-mentioned forsythias are known to be killed by winter cold, this might be tried, if a forsythia must be planted. Hence, its uses are limited greatly, but it is worth mentioning. In the collection at the Arnold Arboretum, it flowers about ten days before most of the other forsythias. E. H. Wilson first sent seeds to the Arnold Arboretum in 1917, collected from native plants in the Diamond Moun- tains in Korea. The original plant is still growing well. Other forsythias growing in the collections of the Arnold Arboretum are: F. europaea; giraldiana; intermedia and its varieties densiflora^ “dwarf,” primulina, and viteUina; japonica saxatilis; ovataY. europaea; suspensa and its varieties atrocaiilis, decipienSy and pallida; viridissima and its varieties bronxensis and koreana; and ‘Arnold Giant.’ An important policy ever since the Arnold Arboretum was established, has been to grow all the species, varieties, and cultivars possible of just such a group as the forsythias so that the better types are there for all to see, growing side by side with those that are less desirable. With such a collection, the Arnold Arbo- retum is in an excellent position to do breeding work, make scientific studies and to offer propagating material to others who want it for the same reasons. Most of the forsythias should be in full bloom by mid-April, so that visitors to the Arnold Arboretum at that time might well make their own selections. Donald Wyman LECTURE SLIDES ON THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM The Arnold Arboretum has a series of about 115 colored slides (35 millimeter) depicting “America’s Greatest Garden,” which may be rented for $5.00, for giving lectures to interested groups. The slides are accompanied by a list giving a brief description of each. An accompanying booklet entitled Through the Arnold Arboretum” furnishes the individual giving the lecture with much valu- able information concerning the Arnold Arboretum. Anyone interested in renting these slides should write to the Arnold Arbore- tum, Jamaica Plain 30, Mass., well in advance of the date when they are to be used, so that they can be reserved and mailed by the proper time. [u] ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University Volume 19 APRIL 24, 1959 Number 4 CRAB APPLES OF MERIT THPj oriental crab apples are the best of the small ornamental flowering trees for landscape use, because they are outstanding in the spring when they are in bloom and again in the fall when they are in fruit. American nurserymen are growing 140 species and varieties to sell, and 250 different kinds are growing in the collections of the Arnold Arboretum. Each year we make specific notes about these trees, recording those that apparently bloom and fruit well every year, those that are definitely alternate in bearing, and those that are outstanding ornamentally for several specific reasons. 'I'he accompanying lists of some 00 spe- cies and varieties are those which can be considered among the best, if not the best, for ornamental purposes. It is impossible to report all the good and bad points about these trees in a few pages. Suffice it to say here, since more detailed information concerning them is available in other publications, that these lists might be scanned carefully for specific purposes. Not everyone wants a pink flowering crab apple, and there are some who want any kind as long as the fruits remain on the trees well into the winter and are suitable for bird food. Most of the crab apples native to the United States have green fruits, and al- though they may be beautiful for the few days they are in flower, they have little ornamental value in the fall. Also, the majority of these are susceptible to the disfiguring disease known as cedar apple rust, especially prevalent in areas where junif)ers and crab a{)ples grow in the near vicinity. Because of this, only one or two of the native crab a[)ples have been recommended. 'I’hen there are those which may be beautiful in both flower and fruit, but which are notoriously alternate bearing. Only a few of these have been recommended, and these merely because their f)rnamental characteristics have been so outstand- ing that many want to grow them anyway. Very few of the varieties with large fruits have been recommended. It has been suggested that a crab apple has fruits up to two inches in diameter; those producing fruits larger than this are considered apples. However, even fruits one and one-half inches in diameter are almost too large, because these are suscepti- ble to insect injury which mars and distorts the fruit, making it most unsightly. In order to prevent this, the trees must be sprayed, sometimes several times, in order to control the insects. It would seem advisable, then, to plant crab apples with much smaller fruits ; those that will not have to be sprayed so often for this purpose, and which have fruits small enough so that they will either be eaten by the birds or will not clutter the ground when they fall. Because of this, very few of the larger-fruiting crab apples are recommended here. There are always those plantsmen who wish a beautiful flowering tree and who also wish to make jellies from the large fruits. There are many good varieties for this purpose, and they are available from nurseries. The point to remember, however, is that in order to produce satisfactory and usable fruit, they must be sprayed properly. The old-fashioned purple crab apple {Malus purvurea) has been planted widely in the past, but its flowers fade to a very poor washed-out purple color after be- ing open only a few days. Many new varieties are now available which are much better than this species, having darker flowers and some of them do not fade too much. However, when grown in different locations or on different soils, or under different climatic conditions, the flower colors of some of these newer varieties do change. A conscious effort was made here to segregate those with red to red- dish flowers, from the group with reddish-purple flowers, but this is not a hard and fast line of demarcation by any manner of means. There will be considerable purple in the flowers of the latter group and some in the other group as well, the amount more or less depending on growing conditions and weather. Of those listed with double or semi-double flowers, the only one with out- standing fruit is ‘Dorothea.’ ‘Henry F. du Pont,’ and the M. purpurea vsLv'\et\es have purplish-red fruits, and the fruits of others are not very ornamental. Many of the hybrids derived from M. purpurea have foliage that is markedly reddish green throughout the growing season. One of the best of these is ‘Red Silver,’ the under surface of its leaves being slightly grayish and the upper sur- face reddish. A few species and varieties will sometimes have a marked autumn color to their foliage, although this is not always true every year, in every situation. The last grouping covers those with different forms or habits. Mostly, the oriental crab apples are small, rounded trees, but a few like M. baccafa, are stand- ard trees up to fifty feet or more in height. There are some that are definitely upright and even columnar in habit, although the columnar types will not retain this habit at maturity. As these trees grow older, heavier and heavier crops of fruits are borne on the branches so that they are bent downwards, eventually so far that they do not recover completely. Pendulous types, too, are listed ; and low forms, of which M. sargeutii is the lowest. Among the following varieties will be found some excellent ornamental speci- mens. Of course, these are not the only ones available from commercial sources, but for those contemplating only a few trees, selections might well be confined to the following : THE BEST OF THE CRAB APPLES baccata and vars. ‘Beauty’ robusta robusta percisifolia White Flowers sargentii spectabilis albi-plena ‘Tanner’ Pink Flowers ‘ Dorothea’ coronaria nieuwlandiana ‘Evelyn’ halliana parkmanii ioensis plena ioensis ‘Nova’ ‘Prince Georges’ scheideckeri spectabilis riversii ‘Van Eseltine’ ‘William Sim’ Pink and White Flowers arnoldiana baccata gracilis ‘ Flame’ fioribunda Katherine’ robusta erecta sargentii rosea Red to Reddish Flowers ‘Adams’ ‘ Almey ’ atrosanguinea ‘ Baskatong’ ‘Crimson Brilliant’ ‘Henrietta Crosby’ ‘ Hopa* ‘Oekonomierat Echtermeyer’ purpurea aldenhamensis purpurea lemoinei ‘Radiant’ Red Splendor* ‘Sissipuk’ ‘Strathmore* Reddish-Purple Flowers ‘Henry F. du I’ont* ‘Makarnik* ‘.Jay Darling* ‘I’atricia* ‘Eiset* purpurea eleyi Double or Semi-Double Flowers Number in parenthesis is the approximate number of petals. coronaria nieuwlandiana ( 13-27) Crimson Brilliant* SD ‘Dorothea’ ( 1 6) halliana parkmanii (lo) hartwi^ii SD ‘Henry F. du Pont’ SD ioensis plena (about 33) ioensis ‘Nova’ ( 18-35) ‘Katherine’ (20) Prince Georges’ (53-6 1) purpurea aldenhamensis SD purpurea lemoinei SD scheideckeri ( 1 o) spectabilis albi-plena (l5) spectabilis riversii (9-20) Van E,seltine’ (l5) Ornamental Fruits R = red Y = yellow O = orange ‘ Almey’ R robusta R & Y baccata and vars. R & Y robusta percisifolia R Beauty’ R & Y Rosseau’ R ‘ Dolgo’ R sieboldii arborescens Y-R ‘ Dorothea’ Y toringoides R cN Y ‘Flame’ R toringoides macrocarpa R & Y Marshall Oyama’ Y & R ‘William Sim’ R ‘ Radiant* R ‘Winter Gold’ Y ‘Red Jade’ R zumi calocarpa R-O Lasting Fruit baccata jackii robusta percisifolia ‘Bob White’ sargentii ‘Makamik’ ‘Tanner’ ‘Ormiston Roy’ ‘Winter Gold’ ‘Red Jade’ zumi calocarpa Foliage Color These crab apples usually have a marked reddish-green foliage color through much of the spring and summer. ‘Baskatong’ ‘Patricia’ ‘Crimson Brilliant’ purpurea and vars. ‘Evelyn’ ‘Red Silver’ ‘Hopa* ‘Red Splendor’ ‘Liset’ ‘ Rosseau’ ‘Makamik’ ‘Sissipuk’ ‘Oekonomierat Echtermeyer’ ‘Strathmore’ [18] I PLATK II Mains ‘ Katlieriiu*’ lias piiik-aiul wliitr doiiliU* flowers. Foliage of these crab apples may turn red to orange in the autumn. baccata dawsoniana ‘Evelyn’ ioensis plena ‘Prince Georges’ ‘ llosseau’ ‘Strathmore’ zumi calocarpa Unique Forms ‘Adams’ - upright baccata columnaris - columnar baccata gracilis - graceful foliage ‘Beauty’ - upright brevipes - low hartwigii - upright, globe-shaped hupehensis - fan-shaped ‘Marshall Oyama’ - upright Oekonomierat Echtermeyer’ - pendulous ‘Red Jade’ - pendulous robusta erecta - columnar sargentii - low sargentii rosea - low ‘Strathmore’ - upright ‘V^an Eseltine’ - upright Further trials are needed for the following varieties: ‘Blanche Ames’ — An Arnold Arboretum seedling of M. spectabilis riversii with semi-double pink and white flowers, if inches diameter; yellow fruits ^ inch diameter, but they fall very soon. Graceful growth habit. Originated in 1939, introduced in 1947. Burton’s Yellow Fruited’ — Apparently only offered by one nursery in 1957, we have no information concerning this variety. ‘Butterball’ — Plant received from the University of Washington Arboretum in 1957, and has not yet bloomed. Chestnut’ — Introduced by the Fruit Breeding Farm of the University of Minne- sota about 1949. The fruits are about 2 inches in diameter — too large for use as an ornamental. ‘Ferrill’s Crimson’ — Offered by Ferrill’s Nursery, Salem, Oregon; originated before 1953; somewhat similar to ‘Red Silver.’ ‘Gladwyne’ — A seedling recently selected by Mrs. Norman J. Henry of Glad- wyne. Pa. Our small trees have not yet flowered. Gwendolyn’ — Originated by A. F. den Boer, Des Moines, Iowa, 1936, intro- duced in 1944; a seedling of Malus florihunda; flowers single and pink, bright red fruits nearly one inch in diameter. Our small trees have not yet flowered. ‘Golden Hornet’ — First distributed by John Waterer & Sons, Bagshot, Surrey, England. It is said to be a natural cross between M. siehoklii calocarpa and M. priinifoUa cocchiea, originated prior to 1949. ‘Goldfinch’ — Probably an 3/. baccala seedling originated in Philadelphia about 1920, but not introduced until about 1953. We have no records of this except that the fiowers are single and white, fruits small and yellow. ioensis ‘Plena Nana’ — Discovered, probably as a sport, in nurseries of A. McGill & Son, Fairview, Oregon, prior to 1955. Leaves and fiowers are identical with those of M. ioensis plena, but habit is more of a bush. Six-year plant is about 6 feet high and 4- feet across. ‘Klehm’ — Somewhat mixed up in the trade, the plants I have seen are forms of 3/. coronaria, said to have double fiowers. Sometimes listed as 3/. ioensis ‘Klehm.* Fruits are greenish. More growth information is needed. ‘Lady Ilgen’ — New variety with medium to large .vellow fruits, introduced to America from Europe by the Montreal Botanic Garden, 1951. ‘Mary Potter* — An Arnold Arboretum cross between 3/. sargentii rosea and 3/. atrosanguinea made in 1939, introduced in 1947 ; tends to breed true from open-pollinated seed. ‘Mount Arbor Special* — Introduced about 1938 by the Mt. Arbor Nurseries of Shenandoah, Iowa; a cross between ‘Plopa’ and ‘Red Silver’ with reddish- purple foliage said to be a brighter color than that of other varieties. ‘Northland’ — Originated as a cross (McIntosh apple X ‘Dolgo*) at the Fruit Breeding Farm of the University of Minnesota in 1926 (selected in 1938 as their No. 1423), named in 1957; hardy in northern Minnesota, fruits red, if inches long, resembling those of ‘Dolgo’ in shape, ripening in mid-August; good for jellies. The fruit is pretty large for a strictly ornamental crab apple, although excellent for a “general purpose” crab. ‘Pillar of Fire’ — Not new; this is the variety ‘Strathmore,’ renamed by Stern’s Nurseries, Geneva, N.Y. ‘Pink Beauty’ — Originated before 1947 at the Government Experiment Station, Morden, Manitoba, Canada, as its No. 451. Seems to have few faults, but fruits drop by Sef)tember 1. Flowers are single, pink; fruits are bright red, maturing in mid-.-\ugust. Robert C. Simpson, Simpson Orchard Co., X’incen- nes, Indiana, named it before 1958. ‘Pixie’ — Originated by A. F. den Boer, Des Moines, Iowa, introduced 1948; single pink fiowers, red fruits, semi-pendulous branching. 'I’he plant we have at the .Arnold Arboretum is small and has not yet fiowered. Prairie Rose* — Originated at the University of Illinois, I'rbana, Illinois, as an open-pollinated seedling of 37. ioensis; has double fiowers and is thought to be more scab-resistant than Bechtel’s crab apple. ‘Pretty Marjorie’ — A new variety from Holland received in the Arnold Arbore- tum in 1958; has not yet bloomed. ‘Professor Sprenger’ — Originated prior to 1950 as a clone of M. ziimi selected by S. G. A. Doorenbos, The Hague, Holland; the fruit is said to be orange and remains on the tree until January. We do not yet have this in our collection. purpurea ‘Eleyi Compacta’ — Introduced by S. G. A. Doorenbos, The Hague, Holland, 1952; flowers similar to M. purpurea eleyi but slightly deeper and a very dense, compact habit. Fruits are purplish-red. ‘Rainbow’ — Offered by Big Rock Nursery, Big Rock, Illinois, actually not a new variety but five standard varieties budded on ‘Hopa’ understock. ‘Seafoam’ — A seedling selection of M, ‘Oekonomierat Echtermeyer, ’ made in 1939, named in 1952 by A. F. den Boer, Des Moines, Iowa, with apparently a pendulous habit. ‘Shakespeare’ — A selection of M. atrosanguiuea, made before 1957 by E. H. Scanlon of Olmsted Falls, Ohio; said not to fade in flower as badly as the species. ‘Sunburst’ — Not new; this is ‘Hopa’ renamed by Stern’s Nurseries, Geneva, N.Y. ‘Upton Pyne’ — Recently introduced from England, this is actually an apple, with large fruit streaked pink. ‘Valley City’ — Several seedlings originating at Northwest Nursery Co., Valley City, N.D. ; selected as substitutes for the purple-leaved plum. Some question as to sufficiently outstanding merit for propagation in the East. ‘Van Houttei’ — Offered by R. C. Notcutt, Ltd., Woodbridge, Suffolk, England, with white flowers and yellow fruits. Introduced into America in 1958. Donald Wyman Still time to register for the following Spring Classes: Field Class: Jamaica Plain — Dr. Donald Wyman April 24-May 29, Friday mornings 10-12 noon $2.00 Natural History of Non-Flowering Plants: Case Estates, Weston — Mr. G. S. Torrey April 29-May 27, Wednesday afternoons 2-4 p.m. $10.00 Field Botany: Case Estates, Weston — Dr. R. A. Howard May 5-June 2, Tuesday afternoons 2-4 p.m. [ ] $2.00 ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University Volume 19 MAY 8, 1959 Number 5 THE LILACS OF NEW ENGLAND The public interest in lilacs is most strikingly shown by the great number of people which come to view the Arboretum’s collection of these plants each spring. It has been estimated that on a clear day at the peak of flowering in the latter half of May, crowds in excess of fifty thousand view this colorful spectacle. The numerous requests for identification of specimens and for information regard- I ing the availabilit,v of cultivars in New England are other manifestations of this I interest. It is in hope of aiding this latter group that this paper is being prepared. My study of nursery catalogues and lists of offerings supplied by nurserymen I has shown that 88 kinds of lilacs are offered for sale in New England. In the ! p)reparation of the lists and keys, the identification of the nurser3’men offering these plants for sale is assumed to be correct. Names of cultivars which could not be verified from the checking of such authoritative works as Mrs. McKelvey's '^'I'he Lilacs” and ‘‘Lilacs for America,” or for which the nurserj’men offering it for sale could not offer satisfactorj’ clarification of place and time of origin, are not included, 'fhe scientific names used in this article are taken from Rehder's “Bibliography of Cultivated frees and Shrubs.” Synonyms used by catalogues are cited in the text describing the plants. I’hose who wish to know to what species the specimens growing in their col- lection belong, may find the key to be of use. No key could be made that would separate all of the cultivars found in Si/rin *Leon Gambetta Ml, M4 ! Michael Buchner C2, Ct, C.), M f. Ml.), Mlb President C’arnot .NFf I IVesident Fallicres C2, M 1 , M.’), M 1 . > William Robinson C2, M(> PINK *Lucie Baltet Cb, M t, .M8, Ml 1, Ml3 *Belle I)e Nancy C7), (’b, M3, M8, I *.Macrostachya Mi, Mb, M8, M I 1, M 13 M 13, M I.i, N2, Rl, \' 1 Single Double *Jean Mace C2 * Jules Ferry Ml3 *Katherine Havermeyer C2, Ml, M2, M4, M6, M8, Mis, M14, Ml5, M16 Marc Micheli M5 *Mme. Antoine Buchner Ml, Ml4 Montaigne M2 *Waldeck-Rousseau M4, Ml 6, Ml 7 MAGENTA Charles X C2, C6, Ml, MS, M4, M8, Mil, M16, N2 *Congo C4, Ml, M2, MS, M4, M6, M9, Mil, Mis, M16, N2 *Mme. F. Morel C2, C4, M6 *Reaumur C2, C4, M4 *Rhum Von Horstenstein C4, M4 Colbert M 1 1 *Mrs. Edward Harding C2, Co, Vl *Paul Thirion MlS, Ml 5, N2 ^President Poincaire C2, C4, Co, M 1 S PURPLE *Diderot C2 *Ludwig Spaeth C2, C4, Ml, M4, Mo, M6, M8, M9, Ml2, MlS, Mlo, M16, N2, Rl Philemon M5 Sensation M 1 5 *Volcan C4, Mil, MlS *Adelaide Dunbar Co, M 1 , M 1 5, M 16 *Charles Joly C2, C5, C6, Ml, MS, M4, M8, M9, Mil, M12, MlS, M16, M17, N2, Rl, Vl *Monge M2, Mo *Paul Hariot Mo, Ml6 Hybrids between S', vulgaris and S. ohlaia dilatata form the dilatata hybrids. Members of this complex flower early in the season. Two cultivars of this group are sold in New England. Both are members of the one hundred best lilacs. ‘Evangeline’ is a magenta, double flowered form N2. ‘Pocahontas, is a purple, single flowered form sold by N2. Hybrids between N. vulgaris and S. oblata giraldii form the Giraldii hybrids. Members of this complex flower early in the season. An asterisk indicates plants listed as among the one hundred best lilacs. Clark’s Giant Single Blue C4, M 1 1 *Esther Staley Single Magenta C4, Mil Pink Spray Single Pink Mil Purple Glory Single Purple Mil Summer Skies Single Magenta Mil Sunset Double Magenta Mil [•28] 12. .S', chinensis VVilld. Much confusion has occurred in the identification of the place of origin of this hybrid species. Wildenow’s specific epithet shows that he thought the plant had originated in China. It appears, however, that this plant originated in the Bo- tanic Garden in Rouen, France about 1777. The parents of this hybrid species are S. X persica and .S. vulgaris. S. X chinensis differs from S. vulgaris in that it does not develop the stiff up- right habit found in the latter, and in the failure to form the heavy branches found in the common lilac. Several nurseries sell this plant under a synonymous name, S. rotlnnogensis Roir. & Turp. S. X chinensis is sold by the following nurseries: C3, Co, Ml, M6, M8, M9, MlO, Mil, Ml2, MlS, Ml6, Rl, R2. l.S. .S’. X persica L This species is of particular taxonomic interest. Linnaeus did not recognize the hybrid origin of this plant and described it as a species. This view was concurred with by most taxonomists until quite recent times. McKelvey held this view in her monumental work I'he Lilac.” There were some dissenters who were of the opinion that this plant was of hybrid origin. However, these workers were not able to agree upon the parents. Cytogenetic work has supported Rehder's opinion that the parents of this hybrid species were .S’, afghanica and .S’, laciniata. This plant is extremely showy, bearing pale lilac flowers at the same time as the common lilac. It differs from the common lilac in its smaller size. .S’, chinensis i was introduced into cultivation about 1614. Nurseries offering it for sale are: C3, C5, Ml, M6, M8, M9, MlO, Mil, Ml2, Ml3, Rl, R2. The white flowered form, .S’, chinensis forma alba (Weston) Voss., is offered for sale by M 1 . 1 I. .S', laciniala Miller. .A native of China, this plant was introduced into cultivation before 1()20. It resembles .S’, chinensis c\ose\y , differing from it in its darker flower color and lacin- iate leaves. It was long thought to be a variety of .S'. X chinensis. The discovery of the |)lant breeding true in the wild, disproves this theory. Cultivated for much the same reason as .S'. X chinensis and for its uni(pie lacini- ate leaves. It is offered for sale by Cl. 15. .S’, pinnatlfolia Ilernsl. A native of western China, this plant was introduced into cultivation in 1904. The white flowers are not conspicuous, thus the plant is usually cultivated for its interesting pinnately compound leaves. ,\s one of the first species to flower, it serves to start the season of lilac Howerirjg. It is offered for sale by Cl. [ -'f ] Key to Nursery Code CONNECTICUT Cl. Brimfield Gardens Nursery, Wethersfield C2. The Hoyt Nurseries, New Canaan C3. E D. Robinson Sales Agency, Wallingford C4-. The Peter Cascio Nursery, West Hartford C5. White Flower Farm, Litchfield C6. C. R. Burr »St Co., Inc., Manchester MASSACHUSETTS Ml. x\dams Nursery, Inc. , Westfield M2. Dahliatown Nurseries, Middleboro M3. Littlefield-Wyman Nurseries, Inc., Abington M-t. Heatherfells Nursery, Andover Mo. Cary Bros. Nursery, Shrewsbury Mb. The Framingham Landscape Co., Framingham Centre M7. Edward Halloran, Inc., Newton Highlands M8. Bigelow Nurseries, Northboro M9. Wyman’s Garden Center, Inc., Framingnam MlO. Kelsey-Highlands Nursery, East Boxford Mil. Weston Nurseries, Inc., North Abington Ml 2. Bay State Nurseries, Inc., North Abington Ml 3. Cherry Hill Nurseries, Thurlows and Stranger, Inc., West Newbury Mid. Hampden Nurseries, Inc., Somer Road, Hampden Ml 5. Corliss Bros., Inc., Gloucester Ml 6. Marinus Van der Pol, Fairhaven Ml?. P^astern Nurseries, Holliston NEW HAMPSHIRE Nl. Exeter Wild Flower Gardens, Exeter N2. Landscape Clinic Nursery, Somersworth N3. Colprit's Nursery & Seed Farm, Dover RHODE ISLAND Rl. Forest Hills Nurseries, Inc., Cranston 10 R2. C. Hoogendoorn, Newport VERMONT Vl. Putney Nursery, Putney BuftDETTE L. WaGENKNECHT [ 30 ] ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University V^oLUME 19 MAY 22, 1959 Numbers 6-7 A BOOKLET ON LILACS FROM RUSSIA The Russian pavilion at the World's Fair in Brussels, Belgium, in 1958 featured a large display of books publislied in languages other than Russian. Only one of the many books oftered for sale in Fmglish proved to be of horticul- tural interest and that, titled “Lilac,”* was offered for fifteen cents. It was obvious that this pamphlet of 40 pages with a colored illustration on the cover and 13 text-figures and plates was a subsidized publication. Leafing through a copy I noted a seemingly amusing account of “Michurinist” methods of plant breeding culminating in the development of many new cultivars. Several of these are described and illustrated and their names should be recorded as new cultivars of Si/ringa vulgaris. Recently our library received an unsolicited copy of the same pamphlet directly from Russia. The booklet, therefore, must be judged not as a souvenir item offered for sale at a World’s Fair but as a treatise on the culture and breeding of lilacs. It is, as well, a confused bit of propaganda for the Michurin-Lysenko school of biological thought and practise. I know of no other single booklet which points out as well the current difference of theory and practise in horticulture and ge- netics between these sciences in the free world and in the Soviet Union. 'fhe author is described in the publisher's note as L. Kolesnikov, an amateur floriculturist with 30 years of experience in hybridization and the winner of the Stalin Brize for breeding more than 300 new strains of lilacs. 'I’he first half of the booklet describes the biological features, species and kinds of lilacs, riie second half the breeding of native lilacs. I he plants considered are grown in the vicinity of Moscow. 'Bhroughout the booklet the author gives credit to the principles stated by I.W Michurin ami A. I). Lysenko. It is difficult to determine from the translation * Lilac, L. Kolesnikov. Foreign Languages Buf)lishitig House, Moscow ;n Ubra^ whether this represents a sincere belief in the principles and practises described or only lip service to a state-directed theory of biology. Many of the tenets pro- posed have double meanings which are at odds with Michurinist principles and frequently it seems the author, or the translator, has his tongue in cheek. For culture of lilacs the author recommends a sunny location with adequate drainage. Lilacs do best, he says, in well fertilized soils. He credits Michurin with the idea that ^Svorn out soil and lack of due care will weaken the plant and cause its degeneration, retarding the growth of the shrub and its flower-shoots, florets and panicles deteriorating in size with a change to the worse in their colour.” Liming, he suggests, may be necessary in acid soils. The best fertilizer is well rotted stable dung although “peat-night-soil and other composts” or chemical fertilizers may be added. Manganese and boron are stated to be minor elements necessary for growth and for improved flower color. Kolesnikov found lilacs easily propagated by seed, grafts, root suckers, cuttings and layering. The best stocks he reports are Syringa josikaea and S. vulgaris, particularly the violet-flowered forms raised from seed. Several types of grafting are suggested but he notes that one must bear in mind Michurin’s indication of the strong mutual influence between graft and stock. This practically infers that the eye or scion should be taken from the older strains with a firmly estab- lished character. Such strains are much better proof against the influence of the stock.” This is based, of course, on the unsupported Michurinist idea that both the scion and the stock could have their heredity modified by grafting and that the more vigorous strain would not only dominate but influence the heredity of the other as well. Kolesnikov reports that scions in his area may be taken in the fall and stored until spring. He believes he obtains a greater success in grafting if the scion was a little withered when grafted for “this guarantees better nourishment for the graft and its better union with the stock.” Culturally most of the plants were grown to a single stem by careful pruning and Kolesnikov speaks with pride of having grafted 24- different varieties on one stock plant. The color cover illustration is of this plant in flower. Kolesnikov also reports a technique of “twig grafting” where branches 1-10 inches long are taken with a bit of the main stem as a heel and the whole used as a scion. It seems important that these branchlets be taken in the fall and allowed to over-winter either beneath the plant in the field or in cold storage. The branchlets must not be watered and the buds are allowed to shrivel. Accord- ing to him, grafting can be done with these in the spring from the time the sap begins to flow until the end of the flowering period. If flower buds are on the branchlets the graft will flower the first year. These cultural principles are considerably difl'erent from those used either at the Arnold Arboretum or in any part of this country. Our own practises in propa- gating and caring for lilacs will be discussed by Mr. Fordham in this same issue [ B2 ] of Ar/ioldia. Perhaps some of Kolesnikov's metliods should be tried for compari- son of results. In his discussion of breeding new lilacs Kolesnikov reports he took up lilac breeding in 1919 and by 1923 had 100 species and strains in his collection. In his early work he gathered seeds from the best shrubs which had been pollinated by insects and selected the most attractive progeny and rejected the worst. While this method has produced results in the past and may be used by the “florist be- ginner” Kolesnikov cryptically reports “in the present level of Soviet science this may not be the principle course to choose.** Sometime after 1923, Kolesnikov was introduced to Michurinist teachings and he resolved then to start breeding new native kinds of lilacs. He states, “l found a plant breeder needs much more than the mere desire to breed new varieties. He must first of all be well-read in the science of selection. As for myself, I con- tinually felt how much I lacked such knowledge. So I got down to a thorough study of Timiryazev, Michurin, Lysenko and their followers. The work of the founders of Soviet agrobiology became my everyday friends and advisors. And to them, I still turn today when unable to solve some problems and always find a clear and adequate scientific explanation.’* Kolesnikov is less than able in presenting a clear explanation for the reader. He states, “Michurin biology, having worked out methods of controlling plant- development, of producing purposeful changes in the nature of vegetable organ- isms, offers us the only true means of remodeling plants. “There are three main stages in the process of Michurinist selection all of them inseparably bound. The first is disjointing the plant’s heredity, the next rearing the plant thus acted on, and the last, artificial selection, which secures the desired characters and properties. “Michurinist plant-selectors achieve their aims by means of sexual and vege- tative hybridization, subjecting {)lant organisms to deliberately modified environ- ments. Mutually complimentary, these methods combine in logical unity.” Kolesnikov has i)roceeded along the principles which, one must suppose, are clear to him. His technicjues of emasculating the Hower, collecting the pollen and {)rotecting the {)ollinated pistil are standard and sound. However, he soon confuses the reader by suggesting variations which he has tried. Michurinist plant breeding leaves nc^thing to chance, so Kolesnikov explains enigmatically, “in natural [)ollination, self-or insect-made, the pollen sets on the stigma, which starts the complex process known as fertilization. Hut the method used by Michurinist science in developing new plant-forms is artificial pollination effected between plants chosen for crossing. * * I'lie author reports further that in theory as in |)ractise I. \’. Michurin proved that the habits and characters of f)lants de- fjend as much on the actual conditions of their life as on predisposition inherited from their parents and ancestors.** While Michurin has maintained that the transmission of hereditary characters depended on the comparative vigor of the two parents Kolesnikov jjoes one step further in trying to equalize this by ex- plaining “l sometimes first endeavor to establish a closer affinity between the two plants by grafting one on the other. They flower side by side and long be- fore crossing are already closer related as parts of one plant. After this crossing itself takes less time than usual.” While Kolesnikov pays lip service to ‘‘pur- poseful crossing” he also admits I also resort to pollenizing with a mixture of pollen from several of the best strains. Such practise, as testified by science, is of general biological benefit to the flower.” All of this is in contrast to another of Kolesnikov’s principles for he states “Michurin has pointed to the danger of the stock, often a wilding, having a bad effect on the hybrid embryo germinating in the mother plant. For this reason I always choose my parent pairs from own- root strains. ” As examples of his purposeful rearing of the hybrids Kolesnikov implies ad- herence to Lysenko’s basic theory of plant development by which a change in the plant’s characteristics can be made in a definite direction by creating specific conditions at a particular moment in the development of the organism. Kolesnikov believes that “at its earlier stage a young hybrid is extremely pliant and easily succumbs to the influence of its surroundings.” While the majority of his hybrid seedlings are carefully nurtured “a certain number are put in worse conditions to inure them to hardships which the selector intends them to encounter in the future.” He states the plant selector is able to cliange its heredity in the man- ner he wants by exposing it to appropriate conditions of soil, nutrition, tempera- ture, etc.” Even after the heredity of the line is altered, in Kolesnikov’s eye, by these applied environmental influences, the experimenter is not through. He describes one step in increasing the fertility of a double strain of lilacs by reducing the doubleness through starvation, a process we have never observed even in the most neglected lilacs of old New England farms. Kolesnikov reports “it is known, for example, that the more double the flower the fewer and feebler are its stamens and the weaker its pistil, which is naturally a great hinderance to artificial polli- nation. My remedy is to sustain them for a year in severe conditions, having shortened their roots and transplanted them into less nutritive soil.” The flow- ers, he reports, become less double and more fertile and can be crossed, and, by rearing their progeny in excellent surroundings, “these seedlings again restored their ancestor’s doubleness or even surpassed them.” If the seedlings of a cross were not successful they were not discarded as they might have been in Kolesnikov's pre-Michurin days, for he states, I never for- get that the first flowering may not bring out all their merits. Many of them may yet be successfully improved or modified if given appropriate conditions. In such cases I often resort to Michurin’s method, grafting the hybrid’s heads with a strain 1 consider will weaken or strengthen this or that feature.” Kolesnikov concludes his booklet with the statement, “Michurinist biology [;n] i ! equips the selector and originator of new varieties with a sure and powerful means J of remodeling plants. With a profound knowledge of Michurinist methods and properly applying them, the experimental florist will certainl}’ win success in the ; noble and exciting art of developing new strains of flowering and ornamental plants.” “Lilac” by Kolesnikov is indeed a sad commentary on the state of plant ge- netics and plant breeding in the Soviet Union. Nearly every quotation given in this paper is subject to correction on tlie most simple elements of botanical and horticultural science. Doctrines such as Kolesnikov expresses might have been I acceptable 200 years ago. They are not today. I sincerely hope that an Ameri- can who bought a copy of the Lilac booklet at Brussels or who has received one I since will recognize it as a ludicrous parody whether or not the author so intended I it to be. , 'I'he following cultivars of Syriuga are described and those with an asterisk are i also illustrated : ‘Alexi Maresiev’*, ‘Dream’*, ‘Ivan Michurin’, Jambul’, ‘Leonid I Leonov’*, ‘Morning in Moscow’, ‘Olimpiada Kolesnikova’*, ‘Polina Osipenko’, I ‘S. M. Kirov’, ‘Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya’. As will be noted from the “tech- ! niques” and “principles” (juoted above, their parentage is presumably quite i unknown. PROPAGATION AND CARE OF LILACS Lilacs, though rugged and persistent under adverse conditions, will respond admirably to good culture. They thrive in a wide variety of soils in a pH range of 6.0 to 7.5 with preference for a well drained situation and full sun. They will not, however, tolerate wet locations. In a remote section of the Arnold Arboretum there are two clumps of lilacs growing in a shallow pocket of rocky soil atop a pudding-stone ledge. Nearby are the remains of an old well, indicating that a dwelling existed at this location. It seems reasonable to suppose that these lilacs were planted by the occupants before the property was acquired by the Arboretum. If this assumption is cor- rect, these plants have persisted under conditions of extreme adversity for over eighty years without attention. Plate III depicts a thirty-five-year-old own-root lilac. By a program of syste- matic pruning, this multi-stemmed specimen is kept in a condition of constant self renewal. Each year or so a few of the older stems are removed to ground level and the new shoots are thinned and spaced to furnish future replacements. Should an occasional stem succumb to borers, which affect only the larger stems, the loss is of no great consequence. However, in the case of single-stem grafted plants it could result in complete loss. Another aspect of this pruning system is that better flower color and size are maintained. Lilac plants when permitted to attain large dimensions show a reduction in size of the flower and a lessening of its color intensity. For obvious reasons this method of lilac care is feasible only with specimens growing on their own roots. A good practice is to remove flower clusters after they have finished blooming. The nutritive materials which other- wise go into the formation of unwanted seed are thereby conserved for the plant. Lilacs which are not permitted to form seed, also flower more profusely the fol- lowing year. Plate IV shows a grafted plant of Syringa vulgaris Paul Thirion.’ In one year this scion has developed sufficient roots to permit removal of the privet understock. Plate W illustrates the incompatibility of lilac and privet by vigorous over- growth of the scion. This one-year-old graft was planted with the union at ground level, giving the scion no opportunity to initiate its own roots. In a few years, [ ] PLATK III 'rhirty-fivc-y«'ar-ol H < cu I Incompatibility of lilac and privet is depicted by overj^rowth of the scion. Had the union been planted deeper the scion rni^ht have initiated roots. thorough soaking at this time compacts the medium around the cuttings and con- stitutes the initial watering. Finally, the polyethelene covers are placed over the cuttings, making certain that they are airtight. Success with this method of propagation depends completely on how well the cuttings are covered, as air leaks on dry days can reduce the necessary high humidity, causing failure. On cloudy, humid days all coverings are removed as routine procedure and the cases are checked for fallen leaves and dead cuttings, which are removed as a sanitary measure. Should the day remain close and humid, the coverings are left off all day. Before again covering the cuttings at night, a spray application of 50% “Captan” at the rate of two teaspoons to the gallon of water is made. An inspection every few days reveals whether or not the medium is drying out, fungus infection is occurring, or insects have hatched from unnoticed egg masses which may have entered the case on cuttings. When properly timed, treated, and handled, the lilacs are ready for potting in about seven weeks. After potting or boxing, material rooted under these humid conditions must be converted to greenhouse atmosphere in a gradual manner. This is accomplished by again covering them with polyethelene film. On cloudy, humid days it can be completely removed, and after several such days occur in succession, the transition will be complete. Otherwise, uncovering at night and covering in the morning, gradually increasing the uncovered period, will accom- plish this very necessary conditioning. HARDWOOD CUTTINGS Lilacs can be rooted from winter cuttings, but so slowly and in such small per- centages that this method seems unworthy of consideration. LAYERS AND DIVISIONS These methods which are applied to a limited extent commercially provide a simple means by which an amateur can increase his lilacs. On observing lilacs, many plants can be seen with sections that can be sepa- rated from the parent plant with a spade. Divisions of this kind, can, with a minimum of attention, become flowering specimens in a few years. Layering is performed by bending a branch down into a small trench about 3 or 4 inches deep and securing it about 12 to 15 inches back from the tip with a forked stick, bent wire or any means that will hold it in place. Shaving the rind from the under side for a distance of several inches at the point where it is pegged, will stimulate cell activity and aid in inducing roots. Next, the soil is replaced, the tip is bent upright and preferably staked. Should the soil be of too heavy a texture, a medium composed of two parts sand, one part peat and one part soil is substituted. If done in the early spring and kept moist, the layer might have a root system adequate to permit severance from the mother plant after one grow- [42] Scion of this two-year-old lilac-privet ^^raft has developed roots to an extent where the privet is of no consequence. Arrow indicates proportionately small remainiiif? understock with dead stubs at its base. ing season, but it is more apt to require two. This can be easily determined by carefully removing enough earth to observe the size of the root system. SEED Seeds have a dormant condition that can be overcome by a period of cold strati- fication. This is accomplished by storage in a refrigerator at approximately 40° F. for one to three months in a polyethelene bag with a slightly moistened medium of sand and peat, or by fall sowing out-of-doors. We favor the former method, as it obviates the necessity of having to furnish protection from the destructive action of vermin. Species lilacs will come true from seed if they are not grown in the proximity of others where cross pollination might occur. Cultivars will not produce true types from seed. GRAFTING As with all our lilac propagation, we approach grafting in an attempt to obtain own-root specimens free of the troubles which often beset grafted plants. Under- stocks are considered as temporary, to function only until the scion has developed a root system sufficient for its own support. Bud grafting has the disadvantage of buds being placed high on the stock, making it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to plant deep enough to induce the scion to initiate its own roots. We do this, on occasion, as a temporary measure to carry material received too late in the season for cuttings, but only with the intention of repropagating, preferably by cuttings, as soon as possible. This temporary storage of material can be done on any lilac or privet available in the nursery. Use of Syringa vulgaris as a rootstock meets with immediate objection because of its treachery. Most lilacs by nature spread vigorously from suckers and this understock could, unless carefully watched, easily outgrow the scion without ever being noticed. In the climate of Boston, Ligusfrujn ovalifoUum qualifies as suitable understock for this method of producing own-root lilacs. The past winter in this area was one of persistently low temperatures, without snow cover, causing abnormally deep frost and extensive damage to plants. However, on digging several hundred lilacs grafted on L. ovalifoUum this spring, no injury to the stock was observed. One-year-old rooted hardwood cuttings of L. ovalifoUum are obtained from nurse- ries which mass produce them at a cost making it more practical to purchase than to raise them. Storage is achieved by heeling in out-of-doors in a deep frame, cold enough to keep them dormant yet warm enough to prevent freezing of the ground, so they will be readily available when needed. Scions may be collected anytime throughout the winter as they are to be used, or can be stored in tightly-closed polyethelene bags with a small amount of slightly-moistened sphagnum moss at about 40° F. in a refrigerator. Scions are [ 44. ] maintained in a condition as fresh as possible; this method preserves them for I many months in a state comparable to newly cut material. A whip-and-tonorue graft is made using a scion about b or 7 inches long and an understock perhaps inches in length. Rootstocks are kept short to facili- tate the deep planting imperative with this method. Completed grafts are bound with rubber budding bands and then are placed deep enough to conceal the union in a moistened medium such as sphagnum moss, peat moss or sawdust. This pro- cedure, known as callusing, can be controlled with a variance of temperature. I Should a fast knitting of the union be desired, a temperature of 70° F. would create it in ten days. Grafts made early in the season can be callused slowly at i lower temperatures. For example, grafts done in January would require about eight weeks to knit at 40° F. Once callused, the.v are kept cold enough to pre- vent further development until planting time. In spring, when the ground warms up and the nursery becomes workable, the soil is prepared with a rotar,v hoe set at its greatest depth to facilitate deep j planting. Budding bands are removed and the grafted plants set in rows spaced a foot apart with unions buried to a depth of about four inches. As with softwood I lilac cuttings, grafts too will show variable results. Many grafted scions form j roots quickly, some do so slowly and others resist. Alfhki) J. Foudiiam I I PLANT COLLECTING IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES I I Dr. Kenneth A. Wilson and the writer have recently’ returned from a month- j long, tOOO-rnile trip involving collecting and field studies in connection with work toward a flora of the southeastern United States. In the course of this travel, j areas in I'ennessee, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South and North Carolina i were visited, herbarium specimens and specimens preserved in alcohol were col- lected, and a number of living plants were sent to the Arnold Arboretum to be added to the numerous southern |>lants in the living collections. Among the plants i collected for trial are clones of Liriodendron, ('(ilj/ca/dlius, Philadelphus, Ma/us, Jinelanr/iier, Pohinia, I^onlrera, and Dierril/a^ mostly from northeastern .\labama, an area of particular interest to i)lant geographers. Lying as it does at the south- ern end of the Appalachian system in an area of moderate climates and with a diversity of habitats, this region lias an accumulation of a number of interesting and rare plants. Without trial it is often (juite impossible to predict whether or not a given species will be hardy in more northern climates, and sometimes sur- prising results are obtained. (Thus, Franklinia alatamaha, known only from a single locality on the coastal plain of Georgia and now extinct there, thrives as far north as eastern New England, and Neviusia alahamensis, long known only from a restricted area in Alabama but now recorded from Arkansas, is perfectly hardy in gardens in the Boston area.) Like prophets, native plants are often without honor in their own lands. Al- most everywhere, the exotic, the unfamiliar, will be grown in preference to beauti- ful, but familiar, plants native to a given region. To a considerable extent this attitude is still seen in the eastern United States, although, happily, more and more recognition is being given to some of the excellent trees and shrubs which flourish so well within the wide range of climates found in this broad area. Thus, although one has yet to see much evidence of the enthusiasm of the English for our native species of Solidago (goldenrod), it is hopeful to see the handsome ever- green species of Myrica gradually coming into use in the South, and such plants as Phlox subulata, P. divaricafa, Cornus florida, and Cercis canadensis are grown almost everywhere in the East. Other native trees and shrubs are becoming more and more important horticulturally , and, through the efforts of individuals such as Mrs. J. Norman Henry, of Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, who has assembled from the wild an exceedingly fine collection of native American plants, many excellent ornamental plants are gradually drawing the attention they deserve in the country of their origin. Among the native trees, mostly from more southern climates but now familiar in New England gardens, are Oxydendrum, Liqiddambar, Halesia Carolina and H. monticola, Cladrastis lutea, Robinia viscosa^ and Catalpa speciosa and C. bignonioides. Shrubs include Calycanthus^ Fothergilla^ Hydrangea, Robinia hispida, Steicartia ovata, Franklinia (this is a tree in more moderate climates). Rhododendron carolinianiim, R. cata-m'biense, and an increasing number of the de- ciduous rhododendrons {R. calendidaceum, R. nudiflorum, R. atlanticiim, etc.), Leucothoe editoriim {L. catesbaei), Pieris floribunda, and others. Species of Vibur- num, Cornus, Rex, Vaccinium , Robinia, Calycanihus, Magnolia, Rhododendron, Ame- Innchier, Malus and Aesculus, among others, deserve to be more widely recognized. Further exploration, especially in the southern Appalachians and adjacent areas will undoubtedly yield many excellent selections to be added to the list. C. E. Wood, Jr. [-Ki] ARNOLDIA A continuation of the Bulletin of Popular Information of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University V^oLUME 19 SEPTEMBER '-ZS, 1959 Numbers 8-9 VIBURNUMS WITH some 96 species and varieties of viburnums growings in the collections and nurseries of the Arnold Arboretum, one would think there might be a bewildering number of these excellent plants from which to choose specimens for landscape planting. Actually there are only about 30 which are sufficiently ornamental and hardy to be considered worth while for planting in Hardiness Zones 4 and 5. If one were to put a premium on red- or yellow-fruiting forms, there are only three yellow-fruited viburnums and ten of the red-fruited sorts; although there are several of the blue-to-black fruiting viburnums, the fruits of which turn red at some time during the maturing process. So, with a comparatively small number from which to choose, one might take a close look at these plants and the reasons for growing them as ornamentals, for they are outstanding in any garden where they are given the space to be properly dis|)layed. In order that the critical reader will know which types have been considered in this study, the species and varieties that are being grown in this country at present will be mentioned, with the reasons why some species, native and exotic, have not been deemed worthy of more consideration. It might be said, in this respect, that someone must decide, in any such study, which plants make the best ornamentals ; and when a single individual does this (the author, in this case), there is obviously plenty of opportunity for disagreement by others. Be that as it may, the following selections will certainly give food for much thought and may be tlie basis on which others can make their own selections for their own purposes. For Flowers I'here are three general types of flowers among the viburnums: One bears a Hat cluster several inches in diameter, made up of hundreds of small individual, perfect flowers that are usually creamy white in color. The snowballs are those [ t7] with rounded clusters of all sterile flowers that do not bear fruits. Finally, there are those plants with flat clusters made up of all fertile flowers in the center of the cluster, but surrounded with large sterile or ray flowers on the perimeter. These are not necessarily the most conspicuous either, for when a plant of Vibur- num (li/atatujn is literally covered with clusters of all fertile flowers, it is just as conspicuous in the landscape as is one of the snowballs. The viburnums usually flower well every year, although they may not bear heavy crops of fruit annually. In the first place, wind and insects must be oper- ating at the time the pollen is ripe ; and, if during this period the weather is cold or rainy, little pollination occurs and hence fruiting will be sparse. The gardener usually loses sight of this fact by the time fall comes and the fruits are then conspicuously absent. Some species ( V. dilatatum is certainly one) should be planted in groups of several seed-grown plants to insure proper cross-pollination and hence good fruit- ing. In many cases of isolated specimen plants, poor fruiting may be traced to lack of sufficient pollen of the right type. Undoubtedly, there is a certain amount of cross-pollination among the species, but certain species are not as good polli- nizers as others. Until more is known specifically, it is best to plant several seed- grown plants together or at least on the same property. Four of the earlier-blooming viburnums should be considered together, since they are competing with each other for prime space in the early spring garden. Viburnujn ccirlesii is the old-fashioned favorite that is hard to discontinue as it is so fragrant and so many people have come to like it. However, the fact remains that this is frequently susceptible to a disease which can kill mature plants quickly, even after many years of normal growth. It is the most fragrant of the four. Viburnum burkic'oodii originated in the nursery of Burk wood and Skipworth, Kingston-on-Thames, England, in 1924, as a hybrid {V. car lesHyi utile). The flowers are fragrant, but not as fragrant as those of V . car/esii, and the leaves are smaller and more glossy. In certain parts of California it is proving evergreen, but in the Arboretum it is entirely deciduous. We started growing a plant be- tween the greenhouses in 1931 and it is now nine feet high. Other plants in the collections are proving perfectly hardy. The habit of growth is somewhat open, not dense and compact. Viburnum juddii originated at the Arnold Arboretum in 1920 as a hybrid {V. carlesHy^bitchiuense) and is proving popular, having better foliage than V. carlesii but not quite as fragrant flowers, and being more dense in habit than V. bitc/nuense. laburnum carlcephalum is proving very popular in this foursome. Originating in the nursery of Burk wood and Skipworth in 1932, it has been in America only a few years (but long enough to become patented). It is a cross between V. carlesii and the Chinese snowball, V. macrocephalum , which is not reliably hardy in New England. However, this hybrid is hardy, apparently, and makes a very dense shrub with foliage quite similar to that of J\ carlesii. I'he flower clusters are rounded, often up to five inches in diameter, fragrant, but not as fragrant as those of r. carlesii. The flower buds are pinkish, but the flowers open pure white. As far as we have seen, none of these last three mentioned species has proved susceptible to the graft blight disease, and any one of them, especially F. carlce- phalum, might be selected as an early-flowering substitute for V . carlesii. At least three viburnums have flat clusters of all perfect flowers which are borne profusely and make quite a display each year. They are V . dilatalinn, lentago and sieholdii. Others, like T. dentation, are also meritorious, but none surpasses those mentioned. In the group bearing flat clusters of fertile flowers surrounded with large, ster- ile ray flowers could be f". opulus, sargentii, trilobum, and J\ plicatum varieties tomentosinn , mariesii and roseum. All of these are good for other reasons as well as for their flowers. Jlburnnni plicatum ro.seum has sterile flowers on the outside of the cluster which open white at first; then, under certain soil or climatic conditions, gradually fade to a deep and very conspicuous pink. This color can vary in intensity (on the same plant) — probably depending on changing soil or even climatic conditions. In other words, we have not found it to be reliably pink every blooming season. There are only three snowballs : The Chinese snowball, the largest, is not re- liably hard}' here. The European snowball (/ . opulus roseum) frequently becomes so infested with fjlant lice that it is not worth the effort of growing. The least hardy — but the best — the Japanese snowball, plicatum (formerly V. tomentosum sterile), is the only one worth growing in the North. This is commonly available from nursery sources, and there is even a variety offered by the Wyoming Nurse- ries of Cincinnati, Ohio, which bears pink sterile flowers instead of white. Whether or not this color holds when the plants are grown in all soils, I do not know, but from color pictures I have seen, this clone must have merit. The Order of Bloom This is the secjueuce in which the viburnum species bloom in the Arnold Arboretum: Earli/ to Mid-April fra grans Earli/ Map buddleifoli um burcjaeticurn furcaturn lantanoides (alnifoliurn ) rhy tidophylloides scln-nsianum Mid- Map bitchiuense burk woodii carlesii juddii Ian tana veitchii Late Map bctidif«)lium [ n. ] Late May (cont.) bracteatum carlcephalum erosum lentago macrocephalum opulus opulus roseum orientale plicatum (tomentosum sterile) plicatum mariesii plicatum tomentosum rafinesquianum rh\ tidophyllum rufidulum sargentii setigerum aurantiacum sieboldii trilobum urceolatum wrightii wrightii hessei Early June cassinoides dentatum dilatatum hupehense lobophyllum prunifolium ovatifolium scabrellum Mid-June acerifolium bracteatum molle pubescens For Fruits As previously noted, there are three yellow-fruited forms, V. opulus xanthocar- pum, sargentii flavurn and dilatatum xanthocarpum. All are good, the first two being somewhat similar in the size of individual fruits and fruit clusters, and, in fact, the general habit of the shrubs themselves. Viburnum dilatatum xanthocarpum has smaller fruits but in much larger, flatter clusters. Red-fruiting forms include V. lantanoides, dilatatum^ opulus and its variety com- pactum; sieboldii, trilobum and its variety compactum; 'wrightii and its variety hessei. One other species, V. setigerum aurantiacum, has been considerably written about in the past for its orange fruit. However, in all the many years it has been grown in the Arnold Arboretum, it has not made a good specimen plant, being very open and leggy at the base. True, the fruits are colorful for the short period they are conspicuous, but it does not seem advisable to recommend this because of its poor growth habit. Really blue fruits are borne by the arrow wood, V . dentatum. The black-fruited species are V . acerifolium and lantana. There are others like V. sieboldii, plicatum varieties, and veitchii, in which the fruits are black at matu- rity, but in ripening, they go through a stage when they are red and at that time, are most interesting. Truly black fruits can not be seen very far, but red fruits can, and so these we value especially during this ripening period. Usually, with V. sieboldii and some of the others, the fruits are red for some time, and as soon as they turn black, sometimes just before, they are taken by the birds. [ -50 ] PLATE VII Vihiinium fj/inifum m