Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. CIRCULAR No. 443 _ a UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Le sf S| WASHINGTON, D.C. ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS* - By E. D. Gorpon and W. M. Horst, associate agricultural engineers, Division of Mechanical Equipment, Bureau of Agricultural Engineering CONTENTS Page ; Page INeedifor forageidriens "2-22 28 ae ee 1] Use of driers—Continued. LV DES OM GIONS 22 — aoa ae eee eee Lee 2 UENaCe and We Sa aa ee 13 ARESTSIOL GRICTSe 2 aoe as ee ee oa SD 4) Sa LOWer LEGUIneIMeN (Ss === eee 15 Wserohadnicrs sss! — eran ae see 12} Operation of driers and cost of drying_-__ _---- 16 Capacityeate ne: Sas ee ee Ad eae CN ea 12 | Feeding value of artficially dried forage_-___-_- 20 NEED FOR FORAGE DRIERS The production and curing of forage crops is an important part of the program of farm operations in most parts of the United States. Not only is forage a basic ingredient of livestock rations but it also has an important place in crop rotation and in the conservation of soil fertility. Since it is desirable to bring quality production in line with profitable operation, attention is being given to the curing of forage artificially. The reason for this comparatively new under- taking lies in the results of feeding experiments which show that for- age of high grade (U. S. grade) is usually superior in feeding value to low-grade forage. Feeding experiments have demonstrated (p. 21) that with artificial drying forage of superior quality can be obtained from a crop that otherwise, under unfavorable weather conditions, would be of inferior quality. "Methods and equipment employed in harvesting, curing, and subsequent processing operations govern to a large degree the value of the product for feed. This is especially true in the more humid areas. Overdrying, leaf shattering, and discoloration by rain and dew, reduce the returns to the grower regardless of whether the hay is used on the farm or is sold. Occasionally unfavorable condi- tions result in practically a total loss of the crop. The use of green, leafy alfalfa hay and of alfalfa meal as a source of vitimin A has also stimulated interest in artificial drying. When the crop is cut at the proper stage and dried artificially without injury, hay or hay products equivalent to U. S. No. 1 Extra Green, Extra Leafy alfalfa may be obtained. The carotene content, source of vitamin A activity, usually is higher in hay artificially dried than in sun-cured hay of the same grade. Artificial drying also tends to preserve the protein and mineral elements of hay by eliminating the 1 The investigation on which this report is based was conducted under cooperation between the Bureaus of Agricultural Engineering, Animal Industry, Dairy Industry, Plant Industry, and Agricultural Eco- nomics. 151358 °—37—_1 De CIRCULAR 443, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE possibilities of leaf shattering in handling and of leaching due to weathering in the field. TYPES OF DRIERS The artificial drying of forage crops has been practiced to a limited extent in some localities in the United States for many years. Avail- able information does not indicate the exact date of the first hay drier in this country. However, about 1909 an experimental drier was constructed and used in Missouri for alfalfa. Also, a machine was constructed for drying native grasses in Louisiana as early as 1910. Since that date many attempts have been made by commercial, State, Air from fan | mixed Air return Air from fan 2 mixed with hot gases from furnace | to fan 2 __withhot gases from furnace 2 FIGURE 1.—Apron-conveyor type of forage drier. and Federal agencies to develop satisfactory forage driers, but few were developed beyond the experimental stage. The design of many of the early machines indicated a radical departure from established practices in the utilization of heat for evaporating moisture from damp or wet materials. In other cases slight changes in design and alterations were made of equipment typical of that used for drying materials other than hay. The most common types were those generally known as apron-conveyor and revolving-drum driers. An apron-conveyor drier of the type com- = = = = = = = = = = ‘= = a Oo o =a a = = 1 Furnace : Discharge FIGURE 2.—Revolving-drum type of forage drier, single-drum design. monly used for hay is diagrammatically illustrated in figure 1, and drum driers in figures 2 and 3. The principles involved in these machines are not new, but the direct exposure of material to be dried to the furnace gases is a practice that has been closely associated with the development of hay driers of various types in the United States. Previously steam was com- monly used, the material to be dried being brought into direct contact with or exposed to air heated by steam radiators. Higher efficiency in the utilization of heat and elimination of the expense and trouble commonly associated with steam boilers are factors frequently cited in favor of direct application of furnace gases. In the apron-conveyor type (fig. 1) the green forage is loaded on an endless screen-wire apron and conveyed through the drying chamber ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS 3 where hot air or furnace gases are circulated through the layer of forage on the apron by means of one or more fans. Driers of this type may have a single endless conveyor, or several conveyors one above the other. As the drying air becomes saturated with moisture it is drawn or allowed to escape from the machine into the atmosphere. The forage may be fed into the drier whole, crushed, or chopped. Drying the for- age whole is more satisfactory in single- -apron machines, especially if the plants are small and light as is usually the case with alfalfa, some clovers, and grasses. The crushing operation is intended to be suffi- cient only for cracking open the heavier stemmy plants including weeds. The crushing-roll pressure should not be sufficient for complete r macera- tion. In connection with experimental work the crushing was done by passing undried soybean plants between a pair of rollers, one of which was steel and the other rubber coated. The drying was noticeably more uniform through the “mattress” of hay as compared with the un- {—™~) FIGURE 3.—Revolving-drum type of forage drier, triple-drum design. crushed hay plants. The chopped material offers more resistance to the movement of air than do the whole plants, crushed or uncrushed, and many of the finely chopped particles fall through the screen apron. Drum driers of the single-drum type (fig. 2) used for drying granular substances such as salt have the feed end slightly elevated. As the drum revolves the material is picked up by baffles or flights fastened to the inside of the shell and then allowed to fall. Each time some of the material is picked up it falls somewhat closer to the discharge end due to the sloping position of the drum. In drying hay the drum is placed in a horizontal position and a current of heated air or furnace gases re- lied upon both for drying and for moving the forage through the ma- chine. With drum driers it is necessary to chop the forage before it is fed into the machine. In some driers of this type the dry material is drawn into a chamber at the discharge end, from which it is conveyed mechanically to a storage structure. In most cases, however, the dry hay passes through the exhaust fan and is blown to a dust collector from which it may be sacked or conveyed to a haymow. In the single-drum drier (fig. 2) the chopped hay passes directly from the wet end (feed end) to the discharge end (dry end). In the triple-drum drier (fig. 3) the material moves through the center shell, back through the second, and out through the third, thus traveling ap- proximately three times ‘the length of the drier before it passes to the exhaust fan. The apron-conveyor drier is a relatively low-temperature drier in which the material remains for a considerable period of time. The temperature of the drying air or furnace gases entering the machine 4 CIRCULAR 443, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE is usually held at from 250° to 350° F., and the period of exposure may vary from 15 to 45 minutes, depending i in part upon the initial mols- ture content of the forage. The temperature of the hay remains much lower than that of the surrounding gases due to the cooling effect of evaporation. The temperature of the forage also tends to coincide with the wet-bulb temperature of the drying air, which, in a hay drier, is much below the dry-bulb temperature. Apron- -conveyor driers are usually much larger machines than drum driers, due in part to the long period of exposure. Single apron- conveyor driers for hay are frequently 150 to 200 feet in length with the equivalent of 10 by 10 feet in section. Drying the plants without chopping or chopping them in long pieces also tends to increase the time during which the material must remain in the machine. The leafy portions and fine stems dry quickly, whereas considerable time is required for drying the long, coarse stems. The overdrying of some parts of the plant and heat losses from the long tunnel may result in a low thermal efficiency for some machines of the apron-conveyor type. The drum drier when used for hay may be classed as a high tem- perature machine, necessitating a short period of exposure to prevent charring or burning of the hay. The temperature of the furnace gases entering the machine is usually held at from 1,000° to 1,500° F., by means of adjustments on the secondary air inlet to the furnace or its quantity of fuel supplied to the burner. The material remains in a drier of the drum type for approximately 1 to 3 minutes, or even less, depending somewhat upon the initial moisture content of the forage. However, as is the case with the apron-conveyor type, the tem- perature of the hay is much below that of the drying gases. The chopping of the hay into short pieces enables it to dry quickly and thereby makes possible the use of high temperatures in drum driers. As the air is used for moving the material through the drier, the light particles move more rapidly than the stemmy material, which is helpful in preventing overdrying. The use of high temperatures and a short period of exposure in drum driers makes possible a rather small, compact unit in comparison with the apron-conveyor type. Single-drum driers are usually 40 to 60 feet in length and from 7 to 9 feet in diameter. Double- or triple- drum driers may be somewhat shorter than single drum units, as the use of multiple drums increases the length of the drying zone with reference to over-all length. In drum driers there seems to be a definite relation between the temperature of the exhaust gases and the moisture content of the hay as it is discharged from the machine. An exhaust-gas tempera- ture of about 200° to 250° F. is usually maintained by controlling the rate of feed of undried hay. If the moisture content of the forage entering the drier is high (65 to 75 percent) the exhaust temperature should be kept at the high point of the range. With moisture contents around 50 percent the exhaust temperature can be held at the lower end of the range. The high exhaust temperature represents a con- siderable loss of heat which tends to reduce the thermal efficiency of drum driers. TESTS OF DRIERS Investigational work by the United States Department of Agricul- ture was begun in 19380 in a study of the mechanics of artificial drying ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS 5 of forage crops, the elements of cost, and the feeding value of artifi- cially dried forage. A small apron-conveyor drier of the type com- monly used in drying cotton linters was set up on the Iberia Live- stock Experiment Station at Jeanerette, La., for experimental use in drying crops for feeding trials (fig. 4). This machine was approxi- mately 46 feet long, 11 feet wide, and 9 feet high. The drying chamber was approximately 8 by 36 feet, and the machine would usually evaporate from 500 to 1,000 pounds of water per hour under the Furnace manifold LAN QAaAN \ AVAL! PAVIA 3 [en EES Wee : Ney \\ese \eten H Fanl} . (Fan2)/ |\(Fan3} ull Fan6 \ se Y 3 =--- 5-4 == [~~ \----/ 7 \ 5-7 7 }- + -/ — \- ---f— b= t-- => — =o | Furnace manifold \ at fans 2 and5 CROSS SECTIONS FIGURE 4.—Apron-conveyor drier used in forage-drying experiments at Iberia Livestock Experiment Station. Drying air enters fan 1 from furnace manifold and is discharged above apron, is drawn through apron by fan 2 and released above it in seccnd compartment, and then is drawn again through apron by fan 3 and released outside the drier. Circulation through fans 4, 5, and 6 is similar. at fans 3and6 conditions in which it was operated. This drier was used for several seasons, but its capacity was insufficient for drying the forage needed for feeding trials. It was unsatisfactory also for drymeg coarse- stemmed crops such as soybeans. In all the experimental driers discussed herein, electric power was used for operating the machinery and fuel oil was used for heat, because of the ease of measuring the quantities used and of controlling operations. After the conveyor-type drier had been used for a few years, a revolving-drum drier was installed. ‘This machine consisted of a single shell 6 feet in diameter and 24 feet in length, mounted hori- zontally. Flights or flanges were attached to the inside of the shell, for picking up and dropping the chopped forage as the drum revolved. 6 CIRCULAR 448, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE A furnace was connected to one end of the drum and an exhaust fan to the other. The dried forage passed from the drum through the fan and was blown into a dust collector or cyclone. This machine was inefficient because of the short drying zone or length of travel and period of exposure of the material in the drier. For increasing the efficiency of this machine a cylinder 2 feet in diameter and 20 feet long was installed inside and concentrical with the large drum (fig. 5). This cylinder was connected to the furnace and to the feeder for the undried material at the furnace end of the drier. At the opposite end the 2-foot cylinder was open and ended 3 feet from the end of the outer cylinder. An exhaust fan was con- nected to the outer shell at the furnace end in such a manner as to move the furnace gases together with the chopped hay first through the inner cylinder and back through the outer cylinder. The dried forage, after passing through the fan, was blown into a dust collector. Conveyor for FIGURE 5.—Revolving-drum drier used in forage-drying experiments at Iberia Livestock Experiment tation. This reverse current or two-pass system lengthened the evaporating zone and greatly increased the efficiency of the machine. From 1931 to 1936, inclusive, the apron-conveyor and double-drum driers, were used in drying about 300 tons of hay, including alfalfa, pasture grass, clovers, andsoybean hay. Approximately 250 tons were used in feeding tests with dairy animals, and the remaining portion with beef cattle. In operating these experimental driers records were kept of the tonnage handled, the power, labor, and fuel requirements, and the moisture content of the forage before and after drying. As time permitted, trips were made to farms operating forage driers in Louisiana, where similar data were obtained. Observations of the various factors entering into the dehydration of forage takes into account a large number of factors, many of which are rather difficult to measure with any degree of precision. A drying machine handling such a bulky product as forage must of itself be large and any attempt to measure air velocities, temperatures, or make hydrometric measurements of the drying gases are only an approxima- tion. It is furthermore impossible to make check runs on the average lot of forage because of the wide range of moisture contents which it has before entering the drier. The presence of weeds and mixtures of other kinds of forage enter into the actual test work and provide data which are somewhat difficult to interpret. The performance of the apron-conveyor and rotary driers located at Iberia Livestock Experiment Station were observed especially as to the power, labor, and fuel requirements for various kinds of crops, for ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS a crops of different maturity, and for different methods of processing. Other factors incidental to these observations were time length of the drying run, drier-inlet and exit-gas temperatures, moisture content of forage entering and leaving the drier, the weight of the material entering the drier, and if possible the weight of the material leaving the drier. When it was not practicable to obtain the weight of the material both entering and leaving the drier the unknown weight was computed from the known weight and the moisture content of the forage (wet basis) before and after drying. Under normal operating conditions it is assumed that the difference between the weight of the forage as it enters and leaves the drier represents the water evaporated and that the quantity of dry matter is constant. From observations and tests of the two driers at the Iberia Station, which have been summarized in tables 1 and 2, the following is noted: 1. In drying alfalfa (whole) on the apron-conveyor drier the average percentage loss in weight is about the same for the seasons 1932 and 1934. Not much forage was dried during the 1933 season. The power consumed per unit weight of material dried, and per unit weight of water evaporated was reduced in 1934 from that shown during the 1932 season. The same holds true for the heat requirements of the drier per unit weight of material dried and per unit weight of water evaporated, although the hourly output and evaporation weight do not show an increase. This more efficient utilization of power and heat in the apron-conveyor drier was due to the scheme of blowing the air counter current to the apron travel for the first half of the apron length. The intake and exhaust system on the apron-conveyor drier was arranged so that the drying gases after first being forced through a section of the apron might be drawn into a fan and then forced through another section of the apron either toward the feed end or discharge end of the drier. If the air moved toward the feed end the counter- current system was obtained. If toward the discharge end (fig. 4), the air moved concurrently with the hay. The air velocity through the mat of forage ranged from 80 to 150 feet per minute in all of these observations. fx] pj Fe H : po obo) a fy © H é H p Ay ca A - a Da. CIRCULAR sy hit) VB V 68 L a 1V 08D IL) OL, OV heme | GRE 8 OP £6P O99 ol 'g 60 6 Gey 9 ‘OZ OV, GOL, 198 pO°L 0G pag 186 IZO'l | 9L°% RZ "Y 812 8 OV Aste] RBI ‘LT | Lo'8 09 'f De O18 Zev volt | 20°% Lv't £ RD 6°98 1p 9L0'T | L078 gg 'g ge L'88 619 160 ‘| OEE Re 2 98 0 OV LOL BIL OO TR pol 9 “9G 0) 69 996 969 Ov 90 6 £6) 0°89 Ove 264 04 OF ‘Ol L6G ® OY VG8 O19 LYS "OCT BIG 169 JO# vO9 hee vy Ol 9 "06 0°69 £69 (ash) ORE 9Z °8 9 O08 0°UD 618 69 LB 8 RD "OI 6°92 VIL LLL G19 gg & 00 6 9°96 9 V9 906 189 py te £101 0°26 1°89 BRO ‘T 119 Lo '% #1 6 0°LI ‘09 998 ‘I LAN £9 % i) ar a} 961 ZUG VOU LLY BOY 62 ‘Ol "RG 8 IL LVa L2Y 81 6 GI Lt £716 APWNOT | SPUNOe] | #02) 8b) sunoy sunoy “VUIN “TIN |e fDOO7T]UST |=) 10000] LST poyed ; -OdBA0 edie 1OJVM Jo! Avy 1018 M 10 Avy jo , anoy ApUNnod | pop JO |, ta U0} 194 aod bANOU | ggg |u04 dog | BPUMOE poywd od Od 000'| 494 -odeag | HHdyno soyo mn | MHC ee ee | cqnduy 180TH , posn 40M0g waiip Lofiaauos-uosdpn yovuaursadxa yn finy vadmoo pun ‘unaghos ‘vfyofyo burhaq- 9L "1 OL * 90 "I TL 8a GY “LZ 66 60 6 ae Ol YI Ge "Ot IZ 8 Lhd 60 °6 VI Ge a “LZ GE OF LS GG Le vi £9 6 LV ‘| GO "ET OV YI 800) “TUN Te) a “ndut WoT] 06 GI 8D ) 1 6 NOSVtLS 8861 1069 ‘T| 160 I a4 69 0% 0% rat) V6 6% Gy £01 BY] 02% | 882% 0g RY gg ov ral) Lg 1G] GZ oY 09 LOZ | 80% 9g} yOl 86 26 ay “9 Ol lI 68 16 1gor | Gil SUO)/DE) | sno “})DMNOpLsy posn posn (ony 1OMOd £ ep por 191 V2 OLY OVS BLE | 999 p68 LG 0 ‘VG 0 ‘V9 lve ROE 261 RRG 8 ‘OP 10% 0'8 0°19 G8 Vy O81 BLE ‘VITVATV STOUIM pig Ggy ‘PO | 86 R99 OVO ‘TO | G29 ‘Get| TALI vee 0 '6P G1L'% | 99 V'29 O68 '% | GOO'S | RYT BZ 6 'ZE OZR Lvl Lev AY a GOP ‘2 1°12 GV6 ‘I q'9 RIE OVe GRILL € ‘18 GRE *T 9 "ZL 1 ‘ey An OIL ‘8 =| OVI OLE Oe O6V DY | Gay (an O16'2 | OOM ‘SE | OFT Ove p '6Y 096 ‘8 Led f ZY ONT ‘6B | OSL ‘RT | RRI 108 6°19 Gsp'% | L4°'9 1°09 O18 ‘T G60 'p | O21 9 “9g OUR ‘I 6°) 0 “64 ORY ‘I Oe ‘8 | BLT 608 yl9 020'% | &'8 arat) Gyo “y G06 ‘bv | ERI OOV 6°89 OL0'9 | v'8 09 Ove ‘bv | OLB ‘OL | TRI Lge g "1g 096 ‘I 10 y'9g Oye T GOR “| OI We 0 “RY Ope ‘2 | v'L 0°19 Ogg ‘G | OFG ‘ET | BRT 18 8 ‘9g Giy'9 | OCT 119 O80‘ | G6b ‘TT | 96T O6E 6°09 GLb | 9'8T amet) O80 'S | 998 ‘OD 0°V9 OIL‘e | 6°61 otL GR0'% | G6L‘9 VOL 099 6'L MD teph OLZ G62 8 "Gg G6I ‘8 =| 6'8 I RY geq'% =| O84 ‘9 1°99 g22 ‘8 | LOT car a) 029 '% | op ‘9 JWOD LIE] | SPUN] | PUA] | PUWAILICT | SPUN ET | SPUNDT } UT 6 odIv yo ‘du ode Yyo aut ee al bis , “SIC -1OV U5] “SIC LOVUG] MA | +O[U] 6998 | pond “OJ JO | odao VU dtomM JOO M UT S8Or] aye duy OABIOJ JO WYAIO AA | -Aap JO ony “BOC U10,[, | OdVAOJ JO WUO4Y “UO0 OANYSTO TA] NOSVUS 2860 “VII VITV STOTIM fe PR ae VE LO'9OR | ODVAOAT 10 [BVO T, t8 'S 81 Iv] LI OY") 91 91% ; GI Ge 'L vi GL Ol £ 09% Gl OU '% ; I Bites e y: 01 60 °L, £8 % BY 6 ; 0% 8 aa IO 'V ear Ive 12 Voi Oi | EES > a 7 ey BEY Gig [rrrr ren aneeneeramecen Beer SNOT] {so} jo uory “GING "ON 1801 “7 OTA, ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS “‘WOsBos OID IO} [840] UO pase 918 SUTANIOS Oso} UI SOBBIOAY ‘po}YSIOM OIG SUUIN[OD Soy} UI SOBBIOAY | 69g €8P Te P 001 0% T'1¢ € 0S €PE LGB LS 089 ‘IT | 0°6 6°29 CCOMOT ME SER Gallet aaneesl = eeu 8061S |". aca ae GE eee tl lnpecoret | by arg Sens [Poe fe ox vgermmre | ay Camas | ane ane | ane reas Z NOSVUS 2861 ‘VAAMOO WZIOHM ! - Gce | GLE 6LP pg9 86 °S 92 °8 G ‘86 VIP 68 6% | FOS | TFT € GP 066 ‘F | L°0% GPG OLS ws OOSmN la Sen oesS a see we e 6P NOSVUS P86 ‘VHAMOO 998 18 €8° 0L°9 88 b'bP 86'2L | 6°L6h | F8P P'Fo 028 ‘cz | L°SI 1 09 082 ‘12 | 009'Z% | 66 | 282 | 08°6Z | ~~~eBvI0AB JO [BIOL 608 | LIO‘T | €8°% G9 °€ 1ST GE [yete SPT ial e bP 0e6 9 "1 6S OUT TeeOOL 2 Cz el Oeye MINOT.» | ans eee me (Aep-0Z1) 8F LLO T $99 LSS 98°8 G's 8° SF G0’ 8 0% 9T 6°19 CST ‘Tce 1°99 OL Gre 7207\"4 CO Say BRE SERBRR? 4 A AY vAA9 E04 KY SERCO nee eocGeer cares ane t/a SY ea PS a 7 GE PF Fis FS ae ed a FY wat fp || | | yay | LOL y vy (7 eg FS RSI 20 Water evaporated S odin a ett of ae iia Lol t PEO ( Pp pe spat HE Ay |_| SEER Y ES SS Ap te aera BES ae eee material (hundreds of pounds) 50LLY etd 45 50 FIGURE 6.—Quantities of water evaporated, and loss in weight, in drying hay from and to different moisture contents. under some conditions, it may be misleading unless reference is also made to the initial moisture content and kind of forage dried. Forage driers may be obtained with rated capacities ranging from approximately 1,000 to 6,000 pounds of water per hour. However, a machine capable of evaporating 3,000 pounds of water per hour approaches the lower limit of capacity for practical purposes under the conditions hay driers are usually operated in the United States. FURNACE AND FUELS A properly designed furnace of ample size is important for a forage drier, as air much in excess of that required for complete combustion is drawn through the furnace. The capacity of the furnace should be large enough, and the size of the openings great enough so as not unduly to increase resistance to the flow of the drying gases. With a drum drier the air requirements at the discharge fan are taken roughly as the equivalent of 1.2 cubic feet of dry air per minute per pound of water evaporated per hour. Since the temperature of the drying gases at the discharge end is in the neighborhood of 250° F. and that at the drier inlet is about 1,500°, the inlet volume is about three times ereater than the volume at dischar ge. Therefore, a dryer with an evaporative capacity of about 3,000 pounds of w ater per hour should allow the passage of about 10 800 cubic feet of air per minute at the inlet. The entrance velocity should not greatly exceed 1,500 feet per minute, 14 CIRCULAR #48, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE With a thermal efficiency of 60 percent the evaporation of 3,000 pounds of water will require in the neighborhood of 5,500,000 B. t. u. This quantity of heat would be supplied by 40 to 45 gallons of fuel oil or 5,500 cubic feet of natural gas fuel. In practice final dilution of furnace gases takes place at the second- ary alr inlet. This inlet is so arranged that the atmospheric air is warmed by passing over heated portions of the exterior of the com- bustion chamber (note drawing of Dutch-oven type of furnace, fig. 7). The furnace gases may be still further diluted by providing an opening just ahead of the drier inlet although this is not essential. Brick Secondary air pesseges wt Fire brick a Ar inte for drier connection = Bridge wall Inspection [* door FicguRe 7.—Duich-oven furnace. Furnace design may be either of the cylindrical or rectangular cross section (figs. 7 and 8). The rectangular cross-section furnace is usually termed the Dutch-oven type and can be built more eco- nomically than the cylindrical type of furnace because only the stand- ard shaped firebrick are required in the combustion chamber. The outer wall can be built of ordinary second-hand construction brick. These two general types of furnaces are adaptable for burning either oil or gas fuels. The problem of utilizing solid fuels in drying forage is one requiring special consideration, so that the drying gases are rendered smokeless and do not contain incandescent particles of flying ash. Ouil- or gas- burning equipment possesses advantages that place the coal- or coke- burning furnace at a disadvantage for hay driers unless a mechanical stoker Is available. In order not to localize the combustion of the fuel in too small a space it has been found that, with the fuel oil used at Jeanerette, from 1.75 to 2 pounds of oil may be fired per hour per cubic foot of com- bustion space. This quantity of oil has a heat value of about 33,000 B. t. w. In drying hay it required the combustion of a fuel capable of gener- ating approximately 5,500,000 B. t.u. of heat energy to evaporate 3,000 pounds of water per hour. On the above basis 1t would require a com- bustion chamber with a volume of from 165 to 175 cubic feet. For practical purposes the dimensions might be as follows: Width 4 feet, height to top of arch 5 feet, and length to bridge wall 10 feet. The combustion of gaseous fuels is relatively simple, requiring only a suitable mixing carburetor. For oil fuels it is essential that there be smokeless combustion which can be accomplished only by thorough atomization of fuel. Under ordinary conditions, satisfactory results are more certain if oil having a specific gravity greater than 0.93 is not used. This specific gravity corresponds to 20.6° (American Petroleum Institute). Fuels heavier than this usually require preheating equip- ment in order to insure proper combustion. ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS 15 <=—_———_ aan rings Ae < burner LLL LLL Ld St BSS an LLL WW Z FIGURE 8.—Cytindrical furnace, with sliding rings for controlling air flow. POWER REQUIREMENTS In a forage drying plant, power is needed for the following purposes: (1) Processing the undried forage. This includes chopping, chop- ping and shredding, or crushing depending upon the type of drier and the operator’s preference. (2) Transporting the dried forage to a storage structure or proces- sing plant either by a drag conveyor or a pneumatic system or a com- bination of both. (3) Conveying the drying gases to the drier from the furnace, and removing them after they have performed their work in vaporizing the moisture from the forage. (4) Miscellaneous uses such as operating fuel pump and blower for the burner, rotating the drum or actuating the apron conveyor of the drier, operating the unloading hoist, baling or grinding the dried material, etc. The choice of the power unit depends somewhat on its availability and the cost per unit of energy. From the standpoint of convenience, electric power has the advantage. Where electric energy is available, in most instances the rates are low enough so that it can be used profitably. Apron-conveyor driers are not adapted to handling finely chopped forage, especially the single-apron machines, because the apron screen allows a considerable portion of the material to drop through and 16 CIRCULAR 448, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE unless it is placed in a comparatively thin layer the chopped hay forms a mattress practically impervious to the passage of the drying gases. However, crushing of the forage by running it through a crushing device patterned after a clothes wringer and cracking the stems, especially the nodes, is found to be of appreciable assistance in drying the forage. i The ordinary silage cutter can be adapted for chopping the forage by slowing down the feed table so that the forage is cut into lengths less than three-eighths of an inch long. A combination silage cutter and hammer mill has been found suitable for processing the undried mate- rial. No screens are used in the hammer mill and it is set to receive the chopped forage directly from the silage cutter. The impact of the hammers on the chopped green forage has been found sufficient to crack open the stemmy sections and further aid the evaporation of water in the drier. Examination of table 3 shows that the power requirements for the experimental apron-conveyor drier ranged from 22 to 28 kilowatt- hours per 1,000 pounds of water evaporated. The power requirements are distributed approximately as follows: Percent Moving apron and auxiliary conveyors______________._----- 11 Moving dryiie -ensesi. 9 28 5.0 ee a ee, ee 83 Ori“ burner OperahiOn.. fet 5 PF oF. ee § ee ee ee 6 For an experimental rotary drier the power requirements ranged from 11 to 19 kilowatt-hours per 1,000 pounds, distributed roughly as follows: Percent Chopping forage. 254 - ptf as a Es 25 to 35 Moying drying eases. fate 26 ee eee 2 eee 45 to 60 Onl-purner Operation. “2. Shel 2 ee ee ee ee eee 4to 8 Rotating drum and conveying forage___________________ 10 to 15 With these figures in mind it will be found that a drum drier capable of evaporating 3,000 pounds of water per hour will need motive power equivalent to 35 or 40 horsepower to run it. This would be divided as follows: Horsepower @hopper 2 eos 2. a epee shed 15 Pancand ceirinm 30 awe. Ge Ss ett he Oe ee ee 20 [BUY Ue 1) ee eee ce mao oe BO rege ure OL a colle EE RY Soe rs Ss Se 146 A danger in motor installation is to overmotorize. Induction-type electric motors running underloaded heat up badly as well as deliver power at low efficiencies, thus increasing the power consumption. Where electric power is not available, power distribution to the vari- ous places about the drier may be accomplished by means of a long countershaft. The motive power in this case may be in the form of a tractor or a stationary gas, oil, or Diesel engine. OPERATION CF DRIERS AND COST OF DRYING By care in the planning of a forage-drier installation, economies can be effected in all of the important items that go to make up the cost of operation. The cycle of operations comprises unloading the trucks or wagons, feeding the wet forage into a chopper or directly into the drier, and disposing of the dried material at the pomt where it is discharged from the drier system. Ordinarily the material is ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS LY blown or conveyed into a bin or haymow. The problem of bagging the chopped forage is aggravated by the fact that comparatively small quantities of it can be packed in a bag. Chopped forage can be baled by using especially rugged balers. Baling of artificially dried forage is, however, not recommended for either chopped or whole hay with present available equipment. ‘The leafy and fine stem portions of the whole hay shatter badly if baled as it emerges from the drier. Chopped hay from a drier, due to its short length, is more difficult to bale than chopped field-cured hay. The unloading of trucks and wagons can be accomplished in several ways by means of a power hoist or horse-drawn unloading fork. The ereen forage can be placed convenient for those who feed the chopper or drier. Oftentimes trucks or wagons are provided with dump bodies. By means of the hay-carrier fork and track system, bunches of hay can be picked up after they are dumped and placed conveniently near the cutter. However, there are a great variety of schemes by which the material can be brought close to the point where it is re- quired. In anchoring the chopper, for instance, it can be so placed that the feeding conveyor is practically at the round level, thereby saving a great amount of lifting of wet forage. The use of machines in process of development by commercial firms for harvesting, chop- ping, and loading into a wagon or truck in the field will doubtless reduce labor requirements at the drier. The following points should be kept in mind regarding drier opera- tion: 1. For a drum drier the forage should be reduced to a uniform size, the size of the particles not being greater than about three-eighths of an inch in any one dimension. 2. The inlet temperature should be kept as high as possible, pref- erably around 1,400° to 1,500° F. Temperatures in excess of these can be used although corrosion of the brick and steel work may occur more readily at temperatures in excess of 1,500°. 3. The temperature of the exhaust gases should range between 200° and 250° F. for a drum drier, depending upon the initial moisture content of the forage. 4. The furnace, drum, fan, and dust collector should be close- coupled to eliminate piping resistance. 5. Conveying chopped forage pneumatically may be accomplished at the expenditure of slightly greater amounts of power than by drag conveyors. Pneumatic conveying of the dried product allows for ereater flexibility than do drag methods. However, from the stand- point of fire prevention, any smoldering sparks of forage will be more readily detected in the open conveyor than in other systems of con- veying. For horizontal runs of pneumatic systems the air velocity should be in the neighborhood of 4,000 feet per minute. 6. The matter of fire prevention is important at the forage-drying plant. Unforeseen stoppages and break-downs may result in fire outbreak. Convenient garden-hose connections with short pieces of hose will repay themselves many times over in extinguishing fires in their incipiency. Forage driers should not be placed in barns or buildings where quantities of inflammable farm products are stored. An inexpensive fire-resistant shelter for the drying plant can_ be made from second-hand steel pipe and corrugated sheet-metal roofing. 18 CIRCULAR 445, U. 8. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 7. It is very important that the forage be thoroughly dried down to its safekeeping moisture content, which for practical purposes should approximate 12 percent. Too often the inexperienced operator attempts to increase the output of the drier beyond its capacity or without due regard to the heat input. The result is a partially dried product that may mold or may heat sufficiently to cause spontaneous combustion. Whole field-cured hay usually can be stored with a moisture content of from 15 to 25 percent, depending upon locality, without danger of heating. Experience indicates that artificially dried hay, especially when chopped, should have a lower moisture content. Such material, when conveyed directly to a mow from the drier, has a higher temperature than that of the atmosphere and there is likely to be some variation in the moisture content of the particles. The cost of operating a drier (power, labor, and fuel) depends in part upon the thermal efficiency of the drier; the initial moisture content of the forage; the unit costs of power, labor, and fuel; and the kind of forage to be dried. However, results of tests made by the Department of Agriculture in Louisiana on several commercial and experimental driers shown in table 3 will give an indication of what may be expected in this connection. The labor was computed at 20 cents per man hour, fuel oil at 3.5 cents per gallon, and electric current at 4.7 cents per kilowatt-hour. Barr ? shows from 20 to 29 kilowatt-hours, 16 to 26 gallons of oil, and from 0.97 to 4 man-hours per 1,000 pounds of water evaporated in various types of driers. With the same unit costs for power, labor, and fuel as shown in table 3 the cost per 1,000 pounds of water evapo- rated ranged from $1.69 to $3.07. Clyde ® gives as the cost of drying per ton of dry hay (2,400 pounds water evaporated at an over-all thermal efficiency of 65 percent for the drier) the following items exclusive of overhead charges: Huet.:29) .callons' oil-atsy. Cents a ean = oe eae © MERE, Sree eee eee ee $2. 07 Labor, 3 men, 1.35 hours at 40 cents, 30 cents, and 30 cents____________ 1. 35 Power, 20.4:kilowatt-hours ate3 centsi22 25. 285 15 “Seer Paes . 61 Repairs:-estimatedist: rae ee sh eee a eh ee i EO CR ee rey. 4, 20 In using the same unit costs for power, labor, and fuel as previously indicated the cost would approximate $1.23 per 1,000 pounds of water evaporated. At the Lewisburg, Tenn., station of the Bureau of Dairy Industry, approximately 170 tons of hay were dried artificially with a commercial rotary-drum drier during the 1935 season, as shown in table 4. The total cost of drying the hay, including the harvesting in the field and mowing in the barn, but not including interest or depreciation on the equipment, was $11. 77 per ton of dry hay. Repairs (labor and parts) accounted for $3.20 of the above cost, the major portion of which was spent on the upkeep and repairs on field-harvesting machinery. Much of this expense appears to be due to the fact that this equipment was manufactured for handling dry hay and was not strong enough to handle the heavier green material. ; 2 BaRR, H.T. ARTIFICIAL CURING OF FORAGE CROPS. La. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 261, 14 pp., illus. 1935, 3 CLYDE, A. W. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN HAY DRIERS. Agr. Engin. 14: 127-129, illus. 1933. 19 ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS 66° 80° 8& 6P° GI GS IT OF Li 63 G8" €T ai 00° 69° AtSGSANNANANNRAANG 96 ° 89° vo G0" 8Z oF 69 &% 6° 89° 83° Gey 69° GG 80° HOA ISH HON OOM N Ao sivjj0q7. | sinopy ————— ep L161 TZ I C81 96 T Lh Or % cpl 80°E G-9T £6 % 8 81 €8°@ 8 FI L8°% Gale 0% G91 c0'€ a 6 66 GCG 16°€ 0 GZ I€ 7 G&G 99 7 G86 16° 8 ES €L% SLnoy ~}ADMNOIUST n1:g IoMOg [ony pozvel0odeag TZ 96 OMmMODAHARDWDNDOMOOCH Te Te ‘OL IG ‘06 ‘61 ‘61 ‘ST 06 ‘61 LZ 6% aS ‘OF ‘ST SUMO | Swo7)DH Soe Jey8@M JO spunod Q00‘T 10d yuourermboeyy i=) SH 9¢° SLD ISHN SIDS iN SO WSHS no 6019 10 N00 ASHONDMOANADMDOOW BSNSHDDHSHHKOHS mr _ re _ TL '8 SLNOLT DWHHOMMANNDAHRDWOOr 9 “€9 ANHAKR sO HH HH N ‘OF ban oe pok?,2) MH OD 19 10 109 ‘0S snoy | -27DN07UST cas LEV 26 ‘OT 9T TT 922 OL 9 08 °8 igi G9°8 06 °9 €% ‘OT 00 ‘OT GOL GL °8 G8 '¢ fon L g te G T 6 L 9 v € T 8 G I L LZ Ge Ve ‘PL ‘OL CG “Cv ‘OS ‘TS "8g “LY 69 89 “SP 6S ‘6E SUO1PLI | SWO7IDH | SpuNnog | Spunod | JUWaaLag poureyqo Avy Arp Jo uo} aod JuetMOIINboy 090 ‘8 CBI ‘Z O9T ‘% 166 ‘% 916 198 828 cre ‘T 206 618 TOL 19¢ ec9 O8F 9eL poyel “ses [GINJU JO J09J OIGNd JO spuesnoy,y, ¢ ; ; ‘ourqoem [e{UEUILIed xe [[VUIS VW Inoy-ueul Jed sjue0 0z LOQR] OJ :IMOY-748 MOTI Jod syueo 27 ‘1aMod JOJ f(y “g Tor[Iu rod syu90 6'¢z) TOT[eS 10d syue0 34g ‘[eN}] JO :o19M pred soo, |; 068 ‘T 000 ‘z 0°6 GPS ‘T 899 0&2 PL 12 ‘819 602 L9¢ €8P 106 bS9g 689 Imoy zed ‘19 CG ‘69 ‘p9 LS PS 69 “G9 ‘8g PS ‘9g {SY “EP GP Tg 4ystoM -odvao | Avy jo | ur sso'T 10ye MA |9ndjnO ‘unys -10S ‘Ted0y ‘W100 puBw UvoqjoAaloA ‘uveqAos ‘uveqAos pure U10d peddoyy) uveqdéos peddoyo uBeqdAos uv}0019 peddoyoO uveqAos 1xoj1g peddoyo vedmoo poddoyoD uveqAos uvj004Q peddoyO uvoeqdos [xojig peddoyoO ssta3 uosuyor puv vivre poddoyoD “eypeyre poddoug IOAO[O OJIN M O[OY AA ezopodse'yT efou M ved M09 OO AA 4a. SSG OE Foe ee a SOSSBId OATZVU OTOU MA EE AE cred uvoeq dos txo[1g peddoyyD ~“-BI[LJLS OTOUM. AeH sdo19 abosof amos Burhup hyyowyysn Ur Jarip ay) ID sjuamasnbas panf puv ‘10qQn) ‘sanog—"s ATA J, Ses SS SeeeOG AS eae 7 tanip 9[dt1,y, ~~, JOfATOD TOICY JolIp Jo odA, 20 CIRCULAR 4438, U. 8S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE In addition to the cost of operating a drier, the cost of harvesting and hauling the material to the machine must be considered, and the overhead charges. With suitable equipment, the cost of harvesting and loading should approximate that for field-cured hay except for the larger tonnage in hauling wet forage instead of dry hay. Over- head charges per 1,000 pounds of water evaporated depend in large measure upon the initial cost of the drier and the tonnage of hay handled each year. TaBLeE 4.—Hay crops dried at the Lewisburg, Tenn., station during the 1935 season Moisture content akaait Fuel oil Hay Rate of uantity | per ton Before After drying dried of hay drying drying Pounds Percent Percent per hour Tons Gallons TA Tialignseis © ee A een a ele Sed 62.9 11.6 1, 674 - 65 £32: WGOSPO COZ Alen segs nee een eee eee 3iA 5.9 2, 352 21 183° SOroMUM Soak Bake eet ae ee eee ee 67.5 4.6 1, 201 13 46.0 Soybean. 222 22 = (2 ooo ea: ee eee 60. 7 10. 4 1, 632 71 31.6 1 Korean, common, and L. sericea. The initial cost of a drum drier installed approximates $2,000 per 1,000 pounds-per-hour evaporating capacity. On this basis and as- suming 6 percent interest on the average investment (one-half the initial cost), 10 percent annual depreciation, and 5 percent for taxes, insurance, and repairs, the overhead cost would approximate $360 per 1,000 pounds-per-hour evaporating capacity, or $1,080 per year for a drier capable of evaporating 3,000 pounds of water per hour. The overhead cost of a drier is, for all practical purposes, a fixed annual cost, but when computed on a per-ton basis decreases as the total volume of hay dried per season increases. With a $6,000 invest- ment in a drier and only 100 tons of hay dried annually, the overhead cost would approximate $10.80 per ton. If the drier handled 1,000 tons per year the overhead would approximate $1.08 per ton. From this it can be seen that the cost of drying may be excessive unless a large quantity of hay is dried annually. FEEDING VALUE OF ARTIFICIALLY DRIED HAY‘ The progress of the feeding tests in which the dehydrated forage was fed to beef cattle and dairy animals at the Iberia Livestock Experiment Station, has shown that, as compared with the sun-cured product, it will produce slightly greater gains in weight; that the cost of producing the dehydrated product is somewhat greater, thus mak- ing the cost of animal gain a trifle higher; that the market grade of the dehydrated product is generally higher; that results of chemical anaylses of comparable grade of hay show but slight variations in favor of the artificially dried product.®? However, the carotene con- tent of the artificially dried hay was considerably higher than that of 4 This section was prepared in collaboration with R. R. Graves, Chief, Division of Dairy Cattle Breed- ing, Feeding, and Management, Bureau of Dairy Industry. 5 If the average field-cured hay at the Jeanerette station were used in making the comparative chemical analyses, the results would undoubtedly be considerably in favor of the artificially dried product for the reason that much of the field-cured hay is badly damaged by unfavorable weather conditions during curing. If this loss in quality were taken into consideration, the cost of the good field-cured hay would be greatly increased. ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS pA hi the sun-cured based on a limited number of tests from the Jeanerette station as shown in table 5. TABLE 5.—Grade and carotene content of samples of the same lot of forage sun- cured and artificially dried Sun-cured Artificially dried Crop United States grade Carotene United States grade Carotene Parts per Parts per f million million Alfalfa____- U.S. No. 2, Heavy Grass Mixed_- 36 | U.S. No. 2, Heavy Grass Mixed_- 104 Soybean___| U.S. No. 1, Extra Green__________ 523] U.S. No: i xtra Green = == — 75 Dez = AWE SOS LE = oes 2) Ee pete ee SBS AT URS ERINO S222 © SERa Ee Ses ees 27 Doe aaa 1G Sree oo ie aes ea 43 | U.S. No. 1, Extra Green___-___---- 64 | 1 Slightly scorched while drying. In sampling the forage at Jeanerette on which grade and carotene determinations were made, a portion of an undried lot of forage was spread on a screen bottom tray and set in the sun to dry. This ma- terial was put under shelter at night and also when rains occurred. The remaining portion of the forage was put through the drier and a sample obtained as it came from the machine. This procedure, while providing comparable samples, resulted in obtaining higher-quality sun-cured hay than would have been possible under prevailing weather conditions at Jeanerette, La. The protein content of the dehydrated product from the Jeanerette station ran about 1 percent higher than for the sun-cured forage, although this did not hold true in every instance. It should be borne in mind that no feeding value is added in the dehydration of forage. Obviously the manner in which the hay is harvested and artificially dehydrated makes for more complete conservation of the feeding value of the forage in that the leaf loss is minimized. Since one advantage of artificial drying is to prevent weathering and reduce leaf loss, espe- cially with alfalfa, dehydrated forage is likely to be rich in protein and calcium as these elements are formed principally in the leaves. With grade Aberdeen Angus beef cattle there was a slight advantage in favor of the artificially dried forage under prevailing test conditions at Jeanerette as to gain per hundredweight of feed consumed. This advantage amounted to about 2.5 to 6 percent. In feeding trials with dairy cattle at Jeanerette six Jersey bull calves were castrated and placed on a ration consisting entirely of artificially dried roughage, at 6 months of age. They gained an aver- age of only 148 pounds each from 6 to 12 months of age, which was only 60 percent of normal. Between 12 and 18 months of age, how- ever, they made normal gains but, of course, were below normal weight at 18 months of age because of the small gains made between 6 and 12 months. In an experiment now in progress five Jersey heifers were started on artificially dried roughage with no grain at 12 months of age. They have maintained slightly more than normal gains between 12 and 18 months of age. These and other experiments indicate that if Jersey heifers are at normal weights at 1 year of age they can maintain normal gains from that time on when fed machine-dried roughage of high quality. 29 CIRCULAR 443, U. 8S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE In feeding dairy animals when the entire ration consists of dehy- drated forage, the production of milk and butterfat is about 60 to 70 percent of the production made on a full-grain ration. In an experi- ment conducted by the Bureau of Dairy Industry at the Lewisburg, Tenn., station, 16 registered Jersey cows made 17 lactation-period records on rations restricted to machine-dried hay (largely legume) and pasture. Their average production, calculated to a mature- equivalent basis, for an average lactation period of 361 days was 6,333 pounds of milk and 329 pounds of butterfat. The average loss in body weight was 33 pounds to the end of the lactation, but this does not take into consideration gains that normally would be made during the dry period prior to the next calving. The same cows made comparable records under register-of-merit testing conditions when they were fed machine-dried legume hay, pasture, and liberal amounts of a grain mixture. Under these conditions the same cows produced an average of 9,656 pounds of milk and 527 pounds of butterfat with an average gain of 70 pounds in body weight to the end of their lacta- tion period. On the roughage-alone ration the cows produced 66 per- cent as much milk and 62 percent as much butterfat as they produced under the register-of-merit conditions. During the time the cows received hay without pasture they consumed an average of 28.6 pounds of hay per cow a day, or at the rate of 3.44 pounds of hay per 100 pounds of body weight. However, in feeding forage to animals, the question of palatability is an important factor and artificially dried hay is very palatable to animals. Some forage plants such as the clovers and alfalfa appear to be more readily consumed by the animals than the coarser, heavy- stemmed legume forages such as soybeans and cowpeas. Artificially dried hay will be uniformly good if the hay is cut at the proper stage of maturity, while much of the nutritive value of field-cured hay may be lost in any given year due to unfavorable weather conditions for field curing. Machine drying is an insurance against losses in quality of hay that results from unfavorable weather conditions for field curing. Two experiments, conducted at the Western Washington Experi- ment Station by the Bureau of Dairy Industry and the Washington Experiment Station, have a bearing on the nutritive value of artifi- cially dried pasture grasses. These experiments were conducted with a small experimental rotary-drum drier. In view of the fact that the drying material is not expected to attain a higher temperature than that of the gases at the outlet from the drier, the outlet temperatures in these experiments were taken as the temperature of drying. How- ever, as the material dried in passing from the feed end to the dis- charge end of the machine it was subjected to temperatures in excess of that indicated as the exhaust temperature. Artifically dried roughage that has a minimum of exposure to sun- light after cutting is thought likely to be deficient in vitamin D. The first experiment ® was conducted to determine the comparative cal- cifying powers of similar samples of green, artificially dried, and sun- cured pasture herbage. It was found that pasture herbage when fed in a green, artificially dried, or sun-cured form, constituting 3 percent of the dry matter in the ration, caused a significantly greater degree of calcification in rats than did the basal diet. Increasing the amount 6 HopGson, R. E., and KNoTT, J. C. THE CALCIFYING PROPERTIES OF GREEN, ARTIFICIALLY DRIED AND ‘SUN-CURED PASTURE HERBAGE. Jour. Agr. Research 48: 439-446. 1934. ARTIFICIAL DRYING OF FORAGE CROPS 23 of the grass fed did not result in a greater degree of calcium deposition. Either the green or the artificially dried grass was as efficient in pro- ducing calcification as was similar grass that was cured by exposure to 15 hours of sunlight. The results of this experiment are not in accord with the results of an experiment conducted by Bechdel’ at the Pennsylvania station who found that there was an appreciable difference in the antirachitic potency of artificially dried alfalfa hay and sun-cured alfalfa hay when fed to 6-month-old dairy calves. A severe rachitic condition developed during a 6-month feeding period when 1 pound of artificially dried hay was added to the basal diet, and a miid rachitic condition developed when 1 pound of sun-cured hay was added. As much as 2.5 pounds of artificially dried hay did not prevent the development of a mild rachitic condition, while the same amount of sun-cured hay prevented the appearance of rickets. Perhaps the calcifying power of the artificially dried pasture herbage was due to the fact that the grasses were immature and growing rapidly at the time of cutting. In the second experiment ° digestion trials were conducted with sheep on mixed pasture grasses that were artificially dried at exhaust gas temperatures of 250°, 300°, 350°, and 400° F. to determine the effects of these temperatures on the digestibility and availability of the nutrients in the pasture herbage. The results were that the percentage of apparent digestibility of the feed constituents of the rations of sun-cured grass and of the grass dried artificially at exhaust- gas temperatures of 250°, 300°, and 350° showed no significant differ- ences, indicating that artificial : drying under these conditions had no depressing effect on the availability of the nutrients. The percentage of apparent digestibility of the nutrients in the sun-cured and in the artificially dried grasses at 250°, 300°, and 350° averaged for dry matter, 76; for crude protein, 76; for crude fiber, 83; for ether extract, 73; for ‘nitrogen-free extract, 83; "and for ash, 44, The results of the feeding trials of the material dried at 400° F. showed that this temperature for the exhaust gas from the drier had a depressing effect on the apparent digestibility of the crude protein, dry matter, and nitrogen-free extract. There was also evidence of the burning of some portions of the more leafy material when dried at the outlet temperature of 400° F. The apparent digestibility of most constituents was somewhat lower for the green grass than for the material dried at 250°, 300°, 350°. As the exhaust temperature of drying was increased by 50° intervals there was a definite lowering of the percentage of natural color in the herbage. That dried at 400° had only 76.3 percent as much color as that dried at 250°. 7 BECHDEL, S. L., pnd otners. RICKETS INCALVES. Pa. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 291, 41 pp., illus. 1933. 8 HODGSON, R. E., K ort, J. C., GRAVES, R. R., and MuRER, H. K. EFFFCT OF TEMPERATURE OF ARTIFICIAL DRYING ON SC AND AVAILABILITY OF NUTRIENTS IN PASTURE HERBAGE. Jour. Agr. Research 50: 147-164; illus. 1935. ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WHEN THIS PUBLICATION WAS LAST PRINTED Sectetary ofp Agreculiute= 2) = tee Ey Henry A. WALLACE. Onder Secretar ities: 0 os pied Le re Beads M. L. Witson. AL SSESL CIE IS CERCLORE S253 lak he hee ee Harry L. Brown. Director of Extension Work___.------------ C. W. WARBURTON. Director Of F tnaqee onc IA el Tepe nee ee W. A. Jump. Director iop-laifermatione: 0-1 ie AS td M. 8. EISENHOWER. Dizcetorof personel 25 22 ae ts W. W. STocKBERGER. Director ap tecsearelt = 2. San see es cera Be James T. JARDINE. SOLU AGEN ee eG Behe Pes a Ss aa a wi Mastin G. WHITE. Agricultural Adjustment Administration____- H. R. Toiuey, ADMINISTRATOR. Bureau of Agricultural Economics __--_------ A. G. Buack, Chief. Bureau of Agricultural Engineering__-_------ S. H. McCrory, Chief. Bureau of Animal Industry__-------------- JoHN R. Mouser, Chief. Bureau of Biological Survey__------------- Tra N. GAaBRIELSON, Chief. Bureau of Chemistry and Sotls____--------- Henry G. Knieut, Chief. Commodity Exchange Administration_______- J. W. T. Duvet, Chief. Bureau\of Dairy, Indusiry ss 42 G8 weigh O. E. REep, Chief. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. Len A. StronG, Chief. Office of Experiment Stations____________---- JAMES T. JARDINE, Chief. Food and Drug Administration_-_----------- WaLtTeR G. CAMPBELL, Chief. Boresh Serurce ae ssid ch = Wa A a, Be ie, pe ot FERDINAND A. Srtcox, Chief. Bureau of Home Economics____------------ Louise STANLEY, Chief. dis) f) ee ae SNL RT Py ees SP rene? plas Zee CLARIBEL R. Barnett, librarian. Burecauof Plant Indusizg=: 26 Ses Arie ae FreDERIcK D. Ricuey, Chief. Bureau of Public Boadss tt) i ipa r eA ers Tuomas H. MacDonatp, Chief. Resettlement Administration. _~_____-------- W. W. ALEXANDER, Administrator. Sail. Conservation Servree 2 sat in ae Se H. H. Bennett, Chief. Weathé; Burcats. 85-42 A Sees Wiuus R. Greae, Chief. This circular is a contirbution from Bureau of Agricultural Engineering____--_-- S. H. McCrory, Chief. Division of Mechanical Equipment_-___-- R. B. Gray, Chief. 24 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1937 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. - - -. - Priced cents De. Aid ii in rie Mite ary» rSln beg iB 7 en ” ea - i Owe ar Ae eaten Cw mtg Pg if RP Sey — ge a 2 5 ' Wear y ale teenie em