ik^i^v^iiLAiv t b I L WART EIDINBUHG H. Digitized 1 by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/b2173124x FACTS AND ARGUMENTS FOR DARWIN. BY FRITZ MULLER. WITH ADDITIONS BY THE AUTHOR. TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN uS., STY OF LONDON. L ONDON: JOHN MUEKAY, ALBEMAIILE STKEET. ISGU. MR. DARWIN'S "WORKS. A NATUKALIST'S VOYAGE EOUND THE WOELD ; being a Jodknal op Reseaeches into the NATtmAL Hisiobt and Geology of CocTKTBiES Visited. Post 8vo. 9s. THE OEIGIN OF SPECIES, by MEANS of NATUEAL SELECTlOiSr ; or, The Peesebvation of Favoueed Races m the SiKnGGLE FOR Life. Woodcuts. Post 8vo. 15s. THE VAEIOUS CONTEIVANCES by wMch BEITISH and FOREIGN ORCHIDS are FERTILIZED by INSECTS, and on the GOOD EFFECTS of INTERCROSSING. Woodcuts. Post 8vo. 9s. THE VAEIATION OP ANIMALS AND PLANTS UNDER DOMESTICATION. Illustrations. 2 vols., 8vo. 28s. LONDON; PItlNTF-D BY W. CLOWES AKD SOSS, DUKE STREET, STAMFORD STREET, AND CIIAHINO CROSS TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. My principal reason for undertaking the translation of Dr. Fritz Miiller's admirable work on the Crustacea, entitled 'Fiir Darwin,' was that it was still, although published as long ago as 1864, and highly esteemed by the author's scientific countrymen, absolutely unknown to a great number of English naturalists, including some who have occupied themselves more or less specially with the subjects of which it treats. It possesses a value quite independent of its reference to Darwinism, due to the number of highly interesting and important facts in the natural history and par- ticularly the developmental history of the Crustacea, which its distinguished author, himself an unwearied and original investigator of these matters, has brought together in it. To a considerable section of English naturalists the tone adopted by the author in speaking of one of the greatest of their number wUl be a source of much gratification. In granting his permission for the translation of his little book, Dr. Fritz Miiller kindly offered to send some emendations and additions to certain parts of it. His notes included many corrections of printers' errors, some of which would have proved unintelligible with- out his aid, some small additions and notes which a 2 ( iv ) have been inserted in their proper places, and two longer pieces, one forming a foot-note near the close of Chap. XI. (p. 119), the other at the end of Chap. XII. (pp. 135-140), describing the probable mode of evolu- tion of the Rhizocephala from the Cirripedia. Of the execution of the translation I will say but little. My chief object in this, as in other cases, has been to furnish, as nearly as possible, a literal version of the original, regarding mere elegance of expression as of secondary importance in a scientific work. As much of Dr. Miiller's Cerman does not submit itseK to such treatment very readily, I must beg his and the reader's indulgence for any imperfections arising from this cause. W. S. D. London, IBth Feb., 1869. AUTHOR'S PREFACE. It is not the purpose of the following pages to discuss once more the arguments adduced for and against Darwin's theory of the origin of species, or to weigh them one against the other. Their object is simply to indicate a few facts favourable to this theory, collected upon the same South American ground, on which, as Darwin tells us, the idea first occurred to him of de- voting his attention to "the origin of species, — that mystery of mysteries." It is only by the accumulation of new and valuable material that the controversy will gradually be brought into a state fit for final decision, and this appears to be for the present of more importance than a repeated analysis of what is already before us. Moreover, it is but fair to leave it to Darwin himself at first to beat off the attacks of his opponents from the splendid structure which he has raised with such a master-hand. F. M. Desterro, 1th Sept., 1863. CONTENTS. Chap. tage I. Intbodtjctoby 1 IL The Species of Melita 7 III. MOEPHOLOGY OF CRUSTACEA 13 IV. Sexual Peooliaeities and DiMOBPrasM 19 V. Eespibation in Land Ceabs 30 VI. STEUOTiniE OF THE Heaet IN Edeiophthalma 39 Vn. Developmental History of Podophthalma 47 Vin. Developmental History of Edeiophthalma 69 IX. Developmental History of Entomosteaga, Cirhipedes, and Ehizocephala 83 X. On the Principles of Classification 97 XI. On the Progress of Evolution 110 XII. Progress op Evolution in Crustacea 122 HISTOHY OF CRUSTACEA. CHAPTEK L INTKODUCTOKT. When I had read Charles Darwin's book 'On the Origin of Species,' it seemed to me that there was one mode, and that perhaps the most certain, of testing the correctness of the views developed in it, namely, to attempt to apply them as specially as possible to some particular group of animals. Such an attempt to establish a genealogical tree, whether for the families of a class, the genera of a large family, or for the species of an extensive genus, and to pro- duce pictures as complete and intelligible as possible of the common ancestors of the various smaller and larger circles, might furnish a result in three dijSerent ways. 1. In the first place, Darwin's suppositions when thus applied might lead to irreconcilable and contradictory conclusions, from which the erroneousness of the sup- positions might be inferred. If Darwin's opinions are false, it was to be expected that contradictions would accompany their detailed application at every step, and B 2 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. I. that these, by their cumulative force, would entirely destroy the suppositions from which they proceeded, even though the deductions derived from each particular case might possess little of the unconditional nature of mathematical proof. 2. Secondly, the attempt might be successful to a greater or less extent. If it was possible upon the foundation and with the aid of the Darwinian theory, to show in what sequence the various smaller and larger circles had separated from the common fundamental form and from each other, in what sequence they had acquired the peculiarities wliich now characterise them, and what transformations they had undergone in the lapse of ages, — if the establishment of such a genea- logical tree, of a primitive history of the group under consideration, free from internal contradictions, was possible, — then this conception, the more completely it took up all the species within itself, and the more deeply it enabled us to descend into the details of their structure, must in the same proportion bear in itself the warrant of its truth, and the more convincingly prove that the foundation upon which it is built is no loose sand, and that it is more than merely " an intel- lectual dream." 3. In the third place, however, it was possible, and this could not but appear, prima facie, the most pro- bable case, that the attempt might be frustrated by the difficulties standing in its way, without settling the question, either way, in a perfectly satisfactory manner. But if it were only possible in this way to arrive for Chap. I. INTRODUCTORY. 3 oneself at a moderately certain independent judg- ment upon a matter affecting tlie highest questions so deeply, even this alone could not but be esteemed a great gain. Having determined to make the attempt, I had in the first place to decide upon some particular class. The choice was necessarily limited to those the chief forms of which were easily to be obtained alive in some abundance. The Crabs and Macrurous Crustacea, the Stomapoda, the Diastylidae, the Amphipoda and Iso- poda, the Ostracoda and Daphnidse, the Copepoda and Parasita, the Cirripedes and Khizocephala of our coast, representing the class of Crustacea with the deficiency only of the Phyllopoda and Xiphosura, furnished a long and varied, and at the same time intimately connected series, such as was at my command in no other class. But even independently of this circumstance the selec- tion of the Crustacea could hardly have been doubtful. Nowhere else, as has already been indicated by various writers, is the temptation stronger to give to the expres- sions " relationship, production from a common funda- mental form," and the like, more than a mere figurative signification, than in the case of the lower Crustacea. Among the parasitic Crustacea, especially, everybody lias long been accustomed to speak, in a manner scarcely admitting of a figurative meaning, of their arrest of development by parasitism, as if tlie transformation of species were a matter of course. It would certainly never appear to any one to be a pastime worthy of the Deity, to amuse himself with the contrivance of these B 2 4 HISTOET OF CEUSTACEA. Chap. I. marvellous cripplings, and so they were supposed to have fallen by their own fault, like Adam, from their previous state of perfection. That a great part of the larger and smaller groups into which this class is divided, might be regarded as satisfactorily established, was a further advantage not to be undervalued; whilst in two other classes with which I was familiar, namely, the Annelida and Aca- lephse, all the attempted arrangements could only be considered preliminary revisions. These undisplace- able groups, like the sharply marked forms of the hard, many-jointed dermal framework, were not only import- ant as safe starting points and supports, but were also of the highest value as inflexible barriers in a problem in wliich, from its very nature, fancy must freely unfold her wings. When I thus began to study our Crustacea more closely from this new stand-point of the Darwinian theory, — when I attempted to bring their arrangements into the form of a genealogical tree, and to form some idea of the probable structm-e of their ancestors, — I speedily saw (as indeed I expected) that it would require years of preliminary work before the essential problem could be seriously handled. Tlie extant systematic works generally laid more weight upon the characters separating the genera, families and orders, than upon those which unite the members of each group, and con- sequently often furnished but httle employable material. But above all things a thorough knowledge of develop- ment was indispensable, and every one knows how im- Chap. I. INTRODUCTOEY. 5 perfect is our present knowledge of this subject. The existing deficiencies were the more diiBcult to supply, because, as Van Beueden remarks with regard to the Decapoda, from the often incredible difference in the development of the most nearly allied forms, these must be separately studied — usually family by family, and frequently genus by genus — ^nay, sometimes, as in the case oiPeneus, even species by species ; and because these investigations, in themselves troublesome and tedious, often depend for their success upon a lucky chance. But although the satisfactory completion of the " Genealogical tree of the Crustacea " appeared to be an undertaking for which the strength and life of an in- dividual would hardly suffice, even under more favour- able circumstances than could be presented by a distant island, far removed from the great market of scientific life, far from libraries and museums — nevertheless its practicability became daily less doubtful in my eyes, and fresh observations daily made me more favourably in- clined towards the Darwinian theory. In determining to state the arguments which I de- rived from the consideration of our Crustacea in favour of Darwin's views, and which (together with more general considerations and observations in other departments), essentially aided in making the correctness of those views seem more and more palpable to me, I am chiefly influ- enced by an expression of Darwin's : " Whoever," says he ('Origin of Species,' p. 482), "is led to believe that species are mutable, will do a good service by conscientiously expressing his conviction." To the 6 HISTOEY OF CEUSTACEA. Chap. I. desire expressed in these words I respond, for my own part, witli the more pleasure, as this furnishes me with an opportunity of publicly giving expression in words to the thanks which I feel most deeply to be due from me to Darwin for the instructions and suggestions for which I am so deeply indebted to his book. Accordingly I throw this sand-grain with confidence into the scale against " the load of prejudice by which this subject is overwhelmed," without troubling myself as to whether the priests of orthodox science will reckon me amongst dreamers and children in knowledge of the laws of nature. Chap. II. THE SPECIES OF MELITA. 7 CHAPTEE II. THE SPECIES OF MELITA. A FALSE supposition, when tlie consequences proceeding £i-om it are followed further and further, will sooner or later lead to absurdities and palpable contradictions. During the period of tormenting doubt — and this was by no means a short one — when the pointer of the scales oscillated before me in perfect uncertainty be- tween the pro and the con, and when any fact leading to a quick decision would have been most welcome to me, I took no small pains to detect some such con- tradictions among the inferences as to the class of Crustacea furnished by the Darwinian theory. But I found none, either then, or subsequently. Those which I thought I had found were dispelled on closer con- sideration, or actually became converted into supports for Darwin's theory. Nor, so far as I am aware, have any of the necessary consequences of Darwin's hypotheses been proved by any one else, to stand in clear and irreconcilable contradic- tion. And yet, as the most profound students of the animal kingdom are amongst Darwin's opponents, it would seem that it ought to have been an easy matter for them to crush him long since beneath a mass of ab- 8 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. CUAP. II. surd, and contradictory inferences, if any such were to be drawn from his theory. To this want of demonstrated contradictions I think we may ascribe just the same im- portance in Darwin's favour, that his opponents have attributed to the absence of demonstrated intermediate forms between the species of the various strata of the earth. Independently of the reasons which Darwin gives for the preservation of such intermediate forms being only exceptional, this last mentioned circumstance will not be regarded as of very great significance by any one who has traced the development of an animal upon larvae fished from the sea, and had to seek in vain for months, and even years, for those transitional forms, which he nevertheless knew to be swarming around him in thousands. A few examples may show how contradictions might come forth as necessary results of the Darwinian hypo- theses. It seems to be a necessity for all crabs which remain for a long time out of the water (but why is of no con- sequence to us here), that air shall penetrate from behind into the branchial cavity. Now these crabs, which have become more or less estranged from the water, belong to the most different families — the Eaninidse (Ranina), Eriphinse (Eri^pMa gonagra), Grapsoidae (Aratus, Ses- arma, &c.), Ocypodidse {Gelasimus, Ocypoda), &c., and the separation of these families must doubtless be referred to a much earlier period than the habit of leaving the water displayed by some of their members. The arrange- ments connected with aerial respiration, therefore, could Chap. II. THE SPECIES OP MELITA. 9 not be inherited from a common ancestor, and could scarcely be accordant in tlieir construction. If there were any such accordance not refei-able to accidental resem- blance among tliem, it would have to be laid in the scale as evidence against the correctness of Darwin's views. I shall show hereafter how in this case the result, far from presenting such contradictions, was rather in the most complete harmony with what might be predicted from Darwin^s theory. A second example. — We are already acquainted with four species of Melita [M. valida, setii^es, anisochir, and Fig. l.i Fresnelii), and I can add a fifth (fig. 1), in which the second pair of feet bears upon one side a small hand of the usual structure, and on the other an enormous clasp-forceps. This want of symmetry is something so ' Fig. 1. Melita exilii n. sp., male, enlarged five times. The large branchial lamclto are seen projecting between the legs. 10 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. 11. unusual among the Ampbipoda, and the structure of the clasp-forceps differs so much from what is seen else- where in this order, and agrees so closely in the five species, that one must unhesitatingly regard them as having sprung from common ancestors belonging to them alone among known species. But one of these species, M. Fresnelii, discovered by Savigny, in Eg}'^pt, is said to want the secondary flagellum of the anterior antennae, which occurs in the others. From the trust- worthiness of all Savigny 's works there can scarcely be a doubt as to the correctness of this statement. Now, if the presence or absence of the secondary flagellum possessed the significance of a distinctive generic cha- racter, which is usually ascribed to it, or if there were other important differences between Melita Fresnelii and the other species above-mentioned, which would make it seem natural to separate M. Fresnelii as a dis- tinct genus, and to leave the others united with the rest of the species of Melita — that is to say, in the sense of the Darwinian theory, if we assume that all the other Melitm possessed common ancestors, which were not at the same time the ancestors of M. Fres- nelii— this would stand in contradiction to the conclu- sion, derived from the structm-e of the clasp-forceps, that M. Fresnelii and the four other species above-men- tioned possessed common ancestors, which were not also the ancestors of the remaining species of Melita. It would follow Chap. II. THE SPECIES OF MELITA From the structure of the clasp-forcpps : u From the presence or absence of the secoiida'y fl.ncclUim. M.patmata, &c. M. exilii, kc. M. Fi esnelii. M. paXmaia, &c. M. exilii, &c. M. FresneUi. As, in tlie first case, among the Crabs, a typical agree- ment of arrangements produced independently of each other would have been a very suspicious circumstance for Darwin's theory, so also, in the second, would any difference more profound tlian that of very nearly allied species. Now it seems to me that the secondary flagellum can by no means furnish a reason for doubting the close relationship of M. Fresnelii to M. exilii, &c., which is indicated by the peculiar structure of the un- paired clasp-forceps. In the first place we must con- sider the possibility that the secondary flagellum, which is not always easy to detect, may only have been over- looked by Savigny, as indeed Spence Bate supposes to have been the case. If it is really deficient it must be remarked that I have found it in species of the ge- nera LeucotJioe, Cyrtophium and AmjphilocJius, in which genera it was missed by Savigny, Dana and Spence Bate — that a species proved by the form of the epimera {coxss Sp. B.) of the caudal feet (uropoda Westw.), &c., to be a true Amphithoe^ possesses it — that in many species of Cerapus it is reduced to a scarcely perceptible 2 I accept this and all the other genera of Amphipocla here men- tioned, with the limits given to them by Spence Bate Catal. of Amphi- podous Crustacea '), 12 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. II. rudiment — nay, that it is sometimes present in youth and disappears (although perhaps not without leaving some trace) at maturity, as was found by Spence Bate to be the case in Aeanthonotus Owenii and Atylus cari- natus, and I can affirm with regard to an Atylus of these seas, remarkable for its plumose branchiae — and that from all this, at the present day when the increasing number of known Amphipoda and the splitting of them into numerous genera thereby induced, compels us to descend to very minute distinctive characters, we must nevertheless hesitate before employing the secondary flagellum as a generic character. The case of Melita Fresnelii therefore cannot excite any doubts as to Darwin's theory. Chap. III. MOKPHOLOGY OF CEUSTACEA. 13 CHAPTEK III. MOEPHOLOGY OF CRUSTACEA — NAUPLIUS-LARV^. If the absence of contradictions among tlie inferences deduced from them for a narrow and consequently easily surveyed department must prepossess us in favour of Darwin's views, it must be welcomed as a positive triumph of his theory if far-reaching conclu- sions founded upon it should subsequently be confirmed by facts, the existence of which science, in its previous state, by no means allowed us to suspect. From many results of this kind upon which I could report, I select as examples, tAvo, which were of particular importance to me, and relate to discoveries the great significance of which in the morphology and classification of the Crus- tacea will not be denied even by the opponents of Darwin. Considerations upon the developmental history of the Crustacea had led me to the conclusion that, if the higher and lower Crustacea were at all derivable from common progenitors, the former also must once have passed through Nauplius-like conditions. Soon after- wards I discovered Naupliiform larvaa of Slirimps (' Ar- chiv fiir Naturg.' 1860, i. p. 8), and I must admit that 14 HISTORY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. III. this discovery gave me tlie first decided tura in Dar- win's favour. The similar number of segments ^ occurring in the ' Like Claus I do not regard the eyes of the Crustacea as limbs, and therefore admit no ocular segment ; on the other hand I count in the median piece of the tail, to which the character of a segment is often denied. In opposition to its interpretation as a segment of the body, only the want of limbs can be cited ; in its favour we have the relation of the intestine, which usually opens in this piece, and sometimes even traverses its whole length, as in Microdeutopus and some other Amphi- poda. In Microdeutopus, as Spence Bate has already pointed out, one is even led to regard small processes of this tubular caudal piece as rudimentary members. Bell also (' Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust.' p. xx.), states that he observed limbs of the last segment in Palxmon seri atua in the form of small movable points. The attempt has often been made to divide the body of the higher Crustacea into small sections composed of equal numbers of segments, these sections consisting of 3, 5 or 7 segments. None of these attempts has ever met with general acceptance ; my own investigations lead me to a conception which nearly approaches Van Beneden's. I assume four sections of 5 segments each — the primitive body, the fore-body, the hind- body, and the middle-body. The primitive body iacludes the segments which the naupliiform larva brings with it out of the egg ; it is after- wards divided, by the younger sections which become developed in its middle, into the head and tail. To this primitive body belong the two l^airs of antennte, the mandibles and the caudal feet (" posterior pair of pleopoda," Sp. B.). Even in the mature animal the fact that these terminal sections belong to one another is sometimes betrayed by the resemblance of their appendages, especially that of the outer branch of the caudal feet, with the outer branch (the so-called scale) of the second pair of antennas. Like the antenuEe, the caudal feet may also become the bearers of high sensorial apparatus, as is shown by the ear of Mysis. The sequence of the sections of the body in order of time seems originally to have been, that first the fore-body, then the liind-body, and linally the middle-body was formed. The fore- body appears, in the adult animal, to be entirely or partially aninlgamated with the head ; its appendages (siagonopoda Westw.) are all or in part serviceable for the reception of food, and generally sliarply distinguished from those of the following group. The segments of the middle-body seem always Chap. III. MOEPHOLOGY OF CEUSTACEA. 15 Crabs and Macrura, Amphipoda and Isopoda, in which the last seven segments are always different from the preceding ones in the appendages with which they are furnished, could only be regarded as an inheritance from the same ancestors. And if at the present day the majority of the Crabs and Macrura, and indeed the Stalk-eyed Crustacea in general, pass through Zoea-like developmental states, and the same mode of transforma- tion was to be ascribed to their ancestors, the same thing must also apply, if not to the immediate ancestors of the Amphipoda and Isopoda, at least to the common progenitors of these and the Stalk-eyed Crustacea. Any such assumption as this was, however, very hazardous, so long as not a single fact properly relating to the to put forth limbs immediately after their own appearance, whilst the segments of the hind-body often remain destitute of feet through long portions of the larval life or even thioughout life (as in many female Diastylidffi), a reason, among many others, for not, as is usual, regard- ing the middle-body of the Crustacea as equivalent to the constantly footless abdomen of Insects. The appendages of the middle-body (pereiopoda) seem never, even in their youngest form, to possess two equal branches, a peculiarity which usually characterises the appendages of the hind-body. This is a circumstance which renders very doubtful the equivalence of the middle-body of the Malacostraca with the section of the body which in the Copepoda bears the swimming feet and in the Cirripedia the cirri. The comprehension of the feet of the hind-body and tail in a single group (as "fausses pattes abdominales," or as " pleopoda ") seems not to be justifiable. Wlien there is a metamorphosis, they are probably always produced at different periods, and they are almost always quite different in structure and function. Even in the Amphipoda, iu which the caudal feet usually resemble in appearance the last two pairs of abdominal feet, they are in general distinguished by some sort of peculiarity, and whilst the abdominal feet are reproduced in wearisome uniformity throughout the entire ordci', the caudal feet are, as is well known, amongst the most variable parts of tlio Amphipoda. 16 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. III. Edrioplithalma could be adduced in its support, as the structure of this very coherent group seemed to be almost irreconcilable with many peculiarities of the Zoea. Thus, in my eyes, this point long constituted one of the chief difficulties in the application of the Dar- winian views to the Crustacea, and I could scarcely venture to hope that I might yet find traces of this passage through the Zoea-form among the Amphipoda or Isopoda, and thus obtain a positive proof of the cor- rectness of this conclusion. At this point Yan Bene- den's statement that a cheliferous Isopod {Tanais Dulongii), belonging, according to Milne-Edwards, to the same family as the common Asellus aqua- ticus, possesses a carapace like the Decapoda, directed my attention to these animals, and a careful exa- Fig. 2.2 mination proved that these Isopods have preserved, more truly than any other adult Crustacea, many of the most essential peculiarities of the Zoiice, especially their * Tanais duhius (?) Kr. $ , magnified 25 times, showing the orifice of entrance (x) into the cavity overarched hy the carapace, in •which an appendage of the second pair of maxillsa (/) plays. On four feet (t, h, I, m) are the rudiments of the lamellas which subsequently form the brood-cavity. Chap. III. NAUPLIUS-FOEMS. 17 mode of respiration. Whilst in all other Oniscoida the abdominal feet serve for respiration, these in our cheli- ferous Isopod (fig. 2) are solely motory organs, into which no blood-corpuscle ever enters, and the chief seat of respiration is, as in the Zoese, in the lateral parts of the carapace, which are abundantly traversed by currents of blood, and beneath which a constant stream of water passes, maintained, as in Zoese and the adult Decapoda, by an appendage of the second pair of maxillae, which is wanting in all other Edi'ioph- thalma. For both these discoveries, it may be remarked in passing, science is indebted less to a happy chance than immediately to Darwin's theory. Species of Peneus live in the European seas, as well as here, and their NaupUus-hrood has no doubt repeatedly passed unnoticed through the hands of the numerous naturalists who have investigated those seas, as well as through my own,^ for it has nothing which could attract particular attention amongst the multifarious and often wonderful NaujjUus-forms. When I, fancying from the similarity of its movements that it Avas a young Pene'us- Zoea, had for the first time captured such a larva, and on bringing it under the microscope found a NaupUus differing toto eoelo from this Zoea, I might have thrown it aside as being completely foreign to the develop- mental series which I was tracing, if the idea of early Naupliiform stages of the higher Crustacea, which in- 3 Mecznikow has recently found Naupliiform shrimp-larvte in the sea near Naples. 0 18 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap, III. deed I did not believe to be still extant, had not at the moment vividly occupied my attention. And if I had not long been seeking among the Edriophthalma for traces of the supposititious Zoiia- state, and seized with avidity upon everything that promised to make this refractory Order serviceable to me, Van Beneden's short statement could hardly have affected me so much in the manner of aa electric shock, and impelled me to a renewed study of the Tanaides, especially as I had once before plagued myself, with them in the Baltic, without getting any further than my predecessors, and I have not much taste for going twice over the same ground. Chap. IV. TANAIS DUBIUS. 19 CHAPTEE IV. SEXUAL PECULIARITIES AND DIMORPHISM. Our Tanais, which in nearly all the particulars of its structure is an extremely remarkable animal, furnished me with a second fact worthy of notice in connection with the theory of the origin of species by natural selection. When handlike or cheliform structures occur in the Crustacea, these are usually more strongly developed in the males than in the females, often becoming enlarged in the former to quite a disproportionate size, as we have abeady seen to be the case in Melita. A better known example of such gigantic chelaB is presented by the males of the Calling Crabs (Gelasimus), which are said in running to carry these claws "elevated, as if beckoning with them " — a statement which, how- ever, is not true of all the species, as a small and particularly large-clawed one, which I have seen run- ning about by thousands in the cassava-fields at the mouth of the Cambriti, always holds them closely pressed against its body. A second peculiarity of the male Crustacea consists not unfrequently in a more abundant development on c 2 20 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA, Chap. IV. the flagellum of the anterior antennae of delicate fila- ments which Spence Bate calls "auditory cilia," and which I have considered to be olfactory organs, as did Leydig before me, although I was not aware of it. Thus they form long dense tufts in the males of many Diastylidae, as Van Beneden also states with regard to Bodotria, whilst the females only possess them more sparingly. In the Copepoda, Claus called attention to the difference of the sexes in this respect. It seems to me, as I may remark in passing, that this stronger deve- lopment in the males is greatly in favour of the opinion maintained by Leydig and myself, as in other cases male animals are not unfrequently guided by the scent in their pursuit of the ardent females. Now, in our Tanais, the young males up to the last change of skin preceding sexual maturity resemble the females, but then they undergo an important metamor- phosis. Amongst other things they lose the moveable appendages of the mouth even to those which serve for the maintenance of the respiratory current ; their in- testine is always found empty, and they appear only to live for love. But what is most remarkable is, that they now ajjpear under two different forms. Some (fig. 3) acquire powerful, long-fingered, and very mobile chelae, and, instead of the single olfactory filament of the female, have from 12 to 17 of these organs, which stand two or three together on each joint of the flagellum. The others (fig. 5) retain the short thick form of the chela3 of the females ; but, on the other hand, their antenn® (fig. 6) are equipped with a far greater number of olfactory- Chap. IV. TANAIS DUBIUS. 121 filaments, which stand in groups of from five to seven to2:ether. Figs. 3-6.1 ' Fig. 3. Head of the ordinary form of the male of Tanais dtihius (?) Kr. magn. 90 times. The teminal setce of the second pair of antennjB project between the cheliferous feet. Fig. 4. Buccal region of the same from below ; A, labrum. Fig. 5. Head of the rarer form of the male, magn. 25 times. Fig. 6. Flagellum of the .same, with olfactory lila- ments, mngn. 90 times. 22 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Ciup. IV. In the first place, and before inquiring into its signi- ficance, I will say a word upon this fact itself. It was natural to consider whether two different species with very similar females and very different males might not perhaps live together, or whether the males, instead of occurring in two sharply defined forms, might not be only variable within very wide limits. I can admit neither of these suppositions. Our Tanais lives among densely interwoven Confervse, which form a coat of about an inch in thickness upon stones in the neighbour- hood of the shore. If a handful of this green felt is put into a large glass with clear sea-water, the walls of the glass are soon seen covered with hundreds, nay with thousands, of these little, plump, whitish Isopods. In this way I have examined thousands of them with the simple lens, and I have also examined many hundreds with the microscope, without finding any differences among the females, or any intermediate forms between the two kinds of males. To the old school this occurrence of two kinds of males will appear to be merely a matter of curiosity. To those who regard the "plan of creation" as the "free conception of an Almighty intellect, matured in the thoughts of the latter before it is manifested in palpable, external forms," it will appear to be a mere caprice of the Creator, as it is inexplicable either from the point of view of practical adaptation, or from the "typical plan of structure." From the side of Darwin's theory, on the contrary, this fact acquires meaning and significance, and it appears in return Chap. TV. TANAIS DUBIUS. 23 to be fitted to throw light upon a question in wliich Bronn saw " the fii'st and most material objection against the new theory," namely, how it is possible that from the accumulation in various directions of the smallest variations running out of one another, varieties and species are produced, which stand out from the pri- mary form clearly and sharply like the petiolated leaf of a Dicotyledon, and are not amalgamated with the primary form and with each other like the irregular curled lobes of a foliaceous Lichen. Let us suppose that the males of our Tanais, hitherto identical in structure, begin to vary, in all directions as Bronn thinks, for aught I care. If the species was adapted to its conditions of existence, if the best in this respect had been attained and secured by natural selec- tion, fresh variations affecting the species as a species would be retrogressions, and thus could have no prospect of prevailing. They must rather have disappeared again as they arose, and the lists would remain open to the males under variation, only in respect of their sexual relations. In these they might acquire advantages over their rivals by their being enabled eitlier to seek or to seize the females better. The best smellers would over- come all that were inferior to them in this respect, unless the latter had other advantages, such as more powerful chela?, to oppose to them. The best claspers would over- come all less strongly armed champions, unless these opposed to them some other advantage, such as sharper senses. It will be easily understood how in this manner all the intermediate steps less favoured in the development 24 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IV, of the olfactory filaments or of the chelae would disappear from the lists, and two sliarply defined forms, the best smellers and the best claspers, would remain as the sole adversaries. At the present day the contest seems to have been decided in favour of the latter, as they occur in greatly preponderating numbers, perhaps a hundred of them to one smeller. To return to Bronn's objection. When he says that " for the support of the Darwinian theory, and in order to explain why many species do not coalesce by means of intermediate forms, he would gladly discover some external or internal principle which should compel the variations of each species to advance in one direction, instead of merely permitting them in all directions," we may, in this as in many other cases, find such a pi'inciple in the fact that actually only a few directions stand open in which the variations are at the same time improve- ments, and in which therefore they can accumulate and become fixed ; whilst in all others, being either indifferent or injurious, they will go as lightly as they come. The occurrence of two kinds of males in the same species may perhaps not be a very rare phenomenon in animals in which the males differ widely from the females in structure. But only in those which can be procured in sufficient abundance, will it be possible to arrive at a conviction that we have not before us either two different species, or animals of different ages. From my own observation, although not very extensive, I can give a second example. It relates to a shore-hopper (Orehestia). The animal Chap. IV. OECHESTIA DAEWINII. 25 (fig. 7) lives in marshy places in the vicinity of the sea, under decaying leaves, in the loose earth which the Marsh Crabs (Gelasimus, Sesarma, Cydografsus, &c.) Fig. -.2 throw lip around the entrance to their burrows, and even under dry cow-dung and horse-dung. If this species removes to a greater distance from the shore than the majority of its congeners (although some of them advance very far into the land and even upon mountains of a thousand feet in height, such as 0. tahitensis, ielluris, and sylvicola), its male differs still more from all known species by the powerful chelse of the second pair of feet. Orchestia grijfhus, from the sandy coast of Monchgut, alone presents a somewhat similar structure, but in a far less degree ; elsewhere the form of the hand usual in the Amphipoda occurs. Now there is a considerable difference between the males of this species, especially in the structure of these chelae — a difference so great that we can scarcely find a parallel to it elsewhere between two species of the genus— and yet, as in Tanais, we do not meet with a - Fig. 7. Orchestia Darwinii, n. sp. male. HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IV. long series of structures running into one another, but only two forms united by no intermediate terms (figs. 8 and 9). The males would be unhesitatingly regarded Figs. 8 and 9. ^ as belonging to two well-marked species if they did not live on the same spot, with undistinguishable females. That the two forms of the chelae of the males occur in this species is so far worthy of notice, because the formation of the chelae, which differs widely from the ordinary structure in the other species, indicates that it has quite recently undergone considerable changes, and therefore such a phenomenon was to be expected in it rather than in other sj)ecies. •'' Figs. 8 and 9. The two forms of the chelaj of the male of Orchestia Barwinii, magn. 45 times. Chap. IV. MELITA MESSALINA. 27 I cannot refrain from talcing this opportunity of re- marking that (so far as appears from Spence Bate's catalogue), for two different kinds of males {OrcJiestia ieUuris and sylvicola) which live together in the forests of New Zealand, only one form of female is known, and hazarding the supposition that we have here a similar case. It does not seem to me to be probable that two nearly allied species of these social Amphipoda should occur mixed together under the same conditions of life. As the males of several species of Melita are distin- guished by the powerful unpaired clasp-forceps, the females of some other species of the same genus are equally distinguish- ed from all other Amphipoda by the circumstance that in them a peculiar apparatus is de- veloped which fa- cilitates their being held by the male. The coxal lamellae of the penultimate pair of feet are produced into hook- like processes, of which the male lays hold with the Fig. 10. Coxal lamella of the penultimate pair of feet of the male (a), and coxal lamella, with the three following joints of the same pair of feet of the female QS) of Melita Messalina, mugn. 45 diam. Fig. 11. Coxal lamella of the same pair of feet of the female of M. insatiahilis. Figs. 10 and U.* 28 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap, IV. bands of the first pair of feet. The two species in which I am acquainted with this structure are amongst the most salacious animals of their order, even females which are laden with eggs in all stages of development, not unfrequently have their males upon their backs. The two species are nearly allied to Melita ixdmiata Leach (Gammarus Dugesii, Edw.), which is widely distributed on the European coasts, and has been fre- quently investigated ; unfortunately, however, I can find no information as to whether the females of this or any other European species possess a similar contriv- ance. In M. exilii all the coxal lamellae are of the ordinary formation. Nevertheless, be this as it will, whether they exist in two or in twenty species, the occurrence of these peculiar hook-like processes is certainly very limited. Now our two species live sheltered beneath slightly tilted stones in the neighbourhood of the shore : one of them, Melita Messalina, so high that it is but rarely covered by the water ; the other, Melita insatiahilis, a little lower; both species live together in numerous swarms. We cannot therefore suppose that the loving couples are threatened with disturbance more frequently than those of other species, nor would it be more difficult for the male, than for those of other species, in case of his losing his female, to find a new one. Nor is it any more easy to see how the contrivance on the body of the female for insuring the act of copulation could be injurious to other species. But so long as it is not demonstrated that our species are particularly in want Chap. IV. MELITA MESSALINA. 29 of tbis contrivance, or that the latter would rather be injurious than beneficial to other species, its presence only in these few Amphipoda will have to be regarded not as the work of far-seeing wisdom, but as that of a favourable cliance made use of by Natural Selection. Under the latter supposition its isolated occurrence is intelligible, whilst we cannot perceive why the Creator blessed just these few species with an ajoparatus which he found to be quite compatible with the " general plan of structure " of the Amphipoda, and yet denied it to others which live under the same external conditions, and equal them even in their extraordinary salacity. Associated with, or in the immediate vicinity of the two species of Melita, live two species of Allorcliestes, the pairs of which are met with almost more numerously than the single animals, and yet their females show no trace of the above-mentioned processes of the coxal lamellae. These cases, I think, must be brought to bear against the conception supported with so much genius and knowledge by Agassiz, that species are embodied thoughts of the Creator; and, with these, all similar instances in which arrangements which would be equally beneficial to all the species of a group are wanting in the majority and only conferred upon a few special favourites, which do not seem to want them any more than the rest. T 30 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. V. CHAPTER V. BESPIRATION IN LAND CRABS. Among tlie numerous facts in the natural history of the Crustacea upon which a new and clear light is thrown by Darwin's theory, besides the two forms of the males in our Tanais and in Orchestia Darwinii, there is one which appears to me of particular im- portance, namely, the character of the branchial cavity in the air-breathing Crabs, of which, unfortunately, I hare been unable to investigate some of the most remarkable {Gecarcinus, Banina). As this character, namely, the existence of an entrance behind the branchiae, has hitherto been noticed, even as a fact, only in Banina, I will go into it in some detail. I have already mentioned that, as indeed is required by Darwin's theory, this entrant orifice is produced in different manners in the different families. In the Frog-crab (Banina) of the Indian Ocean, which, according to Eumphius, loves to climb up on the roofs of the houses, the ordinary anterior entrant orifice is entirely wanting according to Milne-Edwards, and the entrance of a canal opening into the hindmost parts of the branchial cavity is situated beneath the commencement of the abdomen. Chap. V. EESPIEATION IN LAND CRABS. 31 The case is most simple in some of the Grapsoidae, as in Aratus Fisonii, a charming, lively Crab which ascends the mangrove bushes (Bhizophora) and gnaws their leaves. By means of its short but remarkably acute claws, which prick like pins when it runs over the hand, this Crab climbs with the gi-eatest agility upon the thinnest twigs. Once, when I had one of these animals sitting upon my hand, I noticed that it elevated the hinder part of its carapace, and that by this means a wide fissure was opened upon each side above the last pair of feet, through which I could look far into the branchial cavity. I have since been unable to pro- cure this remarkable animal again, but on the other hand, I have frequently repeated the same observation upon another animal of the same family (apparently a true Grapsus), which lives abundantly upon the rocks of our coast. Whilst the hinder part of the carapace rises and the above-mentioned fissure is formed, the anterior part seems to sink, and to narrow or entirely close the anterior entrant orifice. Under water the elevation of the carapace never takes place. The animal therefore opens its branchial cavity in front or behind, according as it has to breathe water or air. How the elevation of the carapace is effected I do not know, but I believe that a membranous sac, which extends from the body cavity far into the branchial cavity beneath the hinder part of the carapace, is in- flated by the impulsion of the fluids of the body, and the carapace is thereby raised. 32 HISTOKY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. V. I have also observed the same elevation of the cara- pace in some species of the allied genera Sesarma and Ct/cloffrapsus, which dig deep holes in marshy ground, and often run about upon the wet mud, or sit, as if keeping watch, before their burrows. One must, how- ever, wait for a long time with these animals, when taken out of the water, before they open their branchial cavity to the air, for they possess a wonderful arrange- ment, by means of which they can continue to breathe water for some time when out of the water. The orifices for the egress of the water which has served for respiration, are situated in these, as in most Crabs, in the anterior angles of the buccal frame (" cadre buccal," M.-Edw.), whilst the entrant fissures of the branchial cavity extend from its hinder angles above the first pair of feet. Now that portion of the carapace which extends at the sides of the mouth between the two orifices (" regions pterygostomiennes "), appears in our animals to be divided into small square compartments. Milne-Edwards has already pointed this out as a par- ticularly remarkable peculiarity. This appearance is caused partly by small wart-like elevations, and iDai'tly and especially by curious geniculated hairs, which to a certain extent constitute a fine net or haii-sieve extended immediately over the surface of the carapace. Thus when a wave of water escapes from the branchial cavity, it immediately becomes diffused in this network of hairs and then again conveyed back to the branchial cavity by vigorous movements of the appendage of the Chap. V. EESPIEATION IN LAND CEABS. 33 outer maxilliped wliich works in the entrant fissure. Whilst the water glides in this way over the carapace in the form of a tliin film, it will again saturate itself with oxygen, and may then serve afresh for the pur- .. poses of respiration. In order to complete this arrange- ment the outer maxillipeds, as indeed has long been known, bear a projecting ridge furnished with a dense fringe of hairs, which commences in front near their median line and passes backwards and outwards to the hinder angle of the buccal frame. Thus the two ridges of the right and left sides form together a triangle with tlie apex turned forwards, — a breakwater by which the water flowing from the branchial cavity is kept away from the mouth and reconducted to the branchial cavity. In very moist air the store of water contained in the branchial cavity may hold out for hours, and it is only when this is used up that the animal elevates its carapace in order to allow the air to have access to its branchiae from behind. In Erij)Ma gonagra the entrant orifices of the respi- ratory cavity serving for aerial respiration are situated, not, as in the Gi-apsoidse, above, but behind the last pair of feet at the sides of the abdomen. The swift-footed Sand-Crabs (Ocypoda) are exclu- sively terrestrial animals, and can scarcely live for a single day in water ; in a much shorter period a state of complete relaxation occurs and all voluntary movements cease.' In these a peculiar arrangement > As this was not observed in the sea, but iu glass vessels contiiining sea-water, it might be supposed that the animals become exhausted D 34 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. V. on the feet of the third and fourth pairs (fig. 12) has lished,. and their margins bear a dense border of long, silky, and peculiarly formed hairs (fig. 13). Milne- Edwards who rightly compares these surfaces, as to their appearance, with articular surfaces, thinks that they serve to diminish the friction between the two feet. In considering this interpretation, the question could not aud die, Lot because they are under water but because tliey have con- sumed all the oxygen which it contained. I therefore put into the same water from which I had just taken an imconscious Ocypoda, with its legs hanging loosely down, a specimen of Lupea diacanlha which had been reduced to the same state by being kept in the air, and this recovered in the water just as the Ocypoda did in the air. 2 Fig. 12. Posterior entrance to the branchial cavity of Ocypoda rhonibea, Fab., nat. size. The carapace and the fourth foot of the right side are removed. 3 Fig. 13. Points of some of the hairs of the basal joints of the foot, magn. 45 diam. long been known, although its connexion with the branchial cavity has not been suspected. These two pairs of feet are more closely approximated than the rest; the op- ) posed surfaces of I their basal joints (therefore the hind- er surface on the third, and the an- terior surface on the fourth feet) are smooth and po- ng. 13.3 Rg. 12.2 Chap. V. KESPIKATION IN LAND CEABS. 35 but arise why sueh an arrangement for the diminution of friction should be necessary in these particular Crabs and between these two feet, leaving out of consideration the fact that the remarkable brushes of hair, which on the other hand must increase friction, also remain un- explained. But as I was bending the feet of a large Sand-Crab to and fro in various directions, in order to see in what movements of the animal friction occurred at the place indicated, and whether these might, per- haps, be movements of particular importance to it and such as would frequently recur, I noticed, when I had stretched the feet widely apart, in the hollow between them a round orifice of considerable size, through which air could easily be blown into the branchial cavity, and a fine rod might even be introduced into it. The orifice opens into the branchial cavity behind a conical lobe, which stands above the third foot in place of a branchia which is wanting in Ocypoda. It is bounded laterally by ridges, which rise above the articulation of the foot, and to which the lower margin of the carapace is applied. Exteriorly, also, it is overarched by these ridges with the exception of a narrow fissure. This fissure is overlaid by the carapace, which exactly at this part projects further downwards than elsewhere, and in this way a complete tube is formed. Whilst in Grapsus the water is allowed to reach the branchite only from the front, I saw it in Ocij^oda flow in also through the orifice just described. In the position of posterior entrant orifice and the accompanying peculiarities of the third and fourth D 2 36 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. V. pairs of feet, two other uon-aquatic species of the same family, which I have had the opportunity of examining, agree with Ocyjpoda. One of these, perhaps Gelasimus means, which lives in the mangrove swamps, and likes to furnish the mouth of its burrow with a thick, cylin- drical chimney of several inches in height, has the brushes on the basal joints of the feet in question com- posed of ordinary hairs. The other, a smaller Gelasimus, not described in Milne-Edwards' ' Natural History of Crustacea,' which prefers drier places and is not afraid to run about on the burning sand under the vertical rays of the noonday sun in December, but can also endure being in water at least for several weeks, re- sembles Ocyjpoda in having these brushes composed of non-setiform, delicate hairs, indeed even more deli- cate and more regularly constructed than in Oeypoda.* What may be the significance of these peculiar hairs, — whether they only keep foreign bodies from the branchial cavity, — whether they furnish moisture to the air flowing past them, — or whether, as their aspect, especially in the small Gelasimus, reminds one of the olfactory filaments of the Crabs, they may also perform similar functions, — are questions the due discussion of which would lead us too far from our subject. Never- theless it may be remarked that in both species, es- pecially in Ocy]3oda, the olfactory filaments in their * This smaller Gelasimus is also remarknhle becaiise tlie cbnmelc-on- like change of colour exhibited by many Crabs occurs very strikingly in it. The carapace of a male which I have now before me shone with a dazzling white in its binder parts five minutes since when I captured it, at present it shows a dull gray tint at the same place. Chap. V. EESPIRATION IN LAND CRABS. 37 ordinary situation are very mucli reduced, and when they are in the water their flageUa never pei-form the peculiar beating movements which may be observed in other Crabs, and even in the larger Gelasimus ; more- over, the organ of smell must probably be sought in these air-breathing Crabs, as in the air-breathing Verte- brata, at the entrance to the respiratory cavity. So much for the facts with regard to the aerial respi- ration of the Crabs. It has already been indicated why Darwin's theory requires that when any peculiar arrangements exist for aerial respiration, these will be differently constructed in different families. That ex- perience is in perfect accordance with this requirement is the more in favour of Darwin, because the schoolmen far from being able to foresee or explain such profound differences, must rather regard them as extremely sur- prising. If, in the nearly allied families of the Ocy- podidse and Grapsoidse, the closest agreement prevails in aU the essential conditions of their structure ; if the same plan of structure is slavishly followed in every thing else, in the organs of sense, in the articulation of the limbs, in every trabecula and tuft of haii-s in the complicated framework of the stomach, and in all the arrangements subserving aquatic respiration, even to the hairs of the ilagella employed in cleaning the branchise,— why have we suddenly this exception, this complete difference, in connexion with aerial respira- tion ? The schoolmen will scarcely have an answer for this question, except by placing themselves on the theo- 38 HISTOEY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. V. logico-teleological stand-point which has justly fallen into disfavour amongst us, and from which the mode of production of an arrangement is supposed to be ex- plained, if its " adaptation " to the animal can be demon- strated. From this point of view we might certainly say that a widely gaping fissure which had nothing pre- judicial in it to Aratus Pisonii among the foliage of the mangrove bushes, was not suitable to the Ocypoda living in sand ; that in the latter, in order to prevent the penetration of the sand, the orifice of the branchial cavity must be placed at its lowest part, directed down- wards, and concealed between broad surfaces fringed with protective brushes of hair. It is far from the intention of these pages to enter upon a general refu- tation of this theory of adaptation. Indeed there is scarcely anything essential to be added to the many admirable remarks that have been made upon this sub- ject since the time of Spinoza. But this may be remarked, that I regard it as one of the most import- ant services of the Darwinian theory that it has de- prived those considerations of usefulness which are still undeniable in the domain of life, of their mystical supremacy. In the case before us it is sufficient to refer to the Gelasimus of the mangrove swamps, which shares the same conditions of life with various Grapsoi- dse and yet does not agree with them, but with the arenicolous Oeypoda. Chap. VI. STRUCTURE OF THE HEART. 39 CHAPTER VI. STRUCTURE OF THE HEART IN THE EDRIOPHTHALMA. Scarcely less striking than the example of the air- breathing Crabs, is the behaviour of the heart in the great section Edriophthalma, which may advantage- ously be divided, after the example of Dana and Spence Bate, only into two orders, the Amphipoda and the Isopoda. In the Amphipoda, to which the above-mentioned naturalists correctly refer the Caprellidse and Cyamidae (Latreille's Lsemodijpoda), the heart has always the same position ; it extends in the form of a long tube through the six segments following the head, and has 'three pairs of fissures, furnished with valves, for the entrance of the blood, situated in the second, third, and fourth of these segments. It was found to be of this structure by La Valette in Niplmrgus (Gammarus puteanus), and by Claus in Phronima ; and I have found it to be the same in a considerable number of species belonging to the most different families.^ 1 The young animals in the egg, a little before their exclusion, aro usually piirticularly convenient for the observation of the fissures in the heart; they are generally sufficiently transparent, the movcjuenfs of the heart are less violent than at a later period, and they lie still even 40 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VI. The sole unimportant exception which I have hitherto met with is presented by the genus Bracliyscelus,^ in which the heart possesses only two pairs of fissures, as it extends forward only into the second body-segment, and is destitute of the pair of fissures situated in this segment in other forms.^ ■without the pressure of a glass cover. Considering the common opinion as to the distribution of the Amphipoda, namely, that they increase in multiiDlicity towards the poles, and diminish towards the equator, it may seem strange that 1 speak of a considerable number of species on a subtropical coast. I therefore remark that in a few months and without examining any depths inaccessible from the shore, I obtained 38 dilferent species, of which 34 are new, which, with the previously lmo^vn species (principally described by Dana) gives GO Brazilian Amphipoda, whilst Kroyer in his ' Gronlauds Amfipoder ' was ac- quainted with only 28 species, including 2 Lsemodipoda, from the Arctic Seas, although these had been investigated by a far greater number of Natm-alists. 2 According to Milne-Edwards' an-angement the females of this genus would belong to the " Hyperines orcliuaires " and the previously im- known males to the ' ' Hype'rines anormales," the distinguishing charac- ter of which, namely the curiously zigzagged inferior anteunaa, is only a sexual peculiarity of the male animals. In systematising from single dead specimens, as to the sex, age, &c. of which nothing is known, similar errors are unavoidable. Thus, in order to give another example of very recent date, a celebrated Ichthyologist, Bleeker, has lately distinguished two groups of the Cyprinodontes as follows : some, the Cyprinodontini, have a "pinna analis non elongata," and the others, the AplocheiHni, a " pinna analis elongata " : according to this the female of a little fish which is very abundant here would belong to the first, and the male to the second group. Such mistakes, as already stated, are unavoidable by the " dry-skin " philosopher, and therefore excusable ; but they nevertheless prove in how random a fashion the present systematic zoology frequently goes on, without principles or sure foundations, and how much it is in want of the infalUble touchstone for the value of the different characters, which Darwin's theory promises to furnish. 3 I find, in Milne-Edwards' ' Le5ons sur la Physiol, et I'Anat. comp.' iii. p. 197, the statement that, according to Frey and Lcuckart, the heart of Cajprella linearis possesses Jive pairs of fissures. I have ex- Chap. VI. STEUCTUKE OF THE HEAET. 41 Considering this uniformity presented by the heart in the entire order of the Amjalnpoda, it cannot but seem very remarkable, that in the very next order of the Isopoda, we find it to be one of the most change- able organs. In the cheliferous Isopods (Tanais) the heart re- sembles that of the Amphipoda in its elongated tubular form, as well as in the number and position of the fissures, but with this difference, that the two fissures of each pair do not lie directly opposite each other. In all other Isopoda the heart is removed towards the abdomen. In the wonderfully deformed parasitic Isopods of the Porcellanse (Entoniseus porcellanse), the spherical heart of the female is confined to a short space of the elongated first abdominal segment, and seems to possess only a single pair of fissures. In the male of Entoniseus Cancrorum (n. sp.), the heart (fig. 16) is situated in the third abdominal seg- 4 ment. In the Cassidinse, the heart (fig. 14) is likewise short and furnished with two pairs of fissures, situated in the last segment of the thorax and the first segment of the abdomen. Lastly, in a young Anilocra, I find the heart (fig. 15) extending through the whole length of the abdomen and furnished amined perfectly transparent young Caprellx (probably the young of Caprella altmuala, Dana, with which they occuiTed), but can only find the usual three pairs. Fig. 14. Heart of a young Cassidina. 42 HISTOKY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. VI. with four (or five ?) fissures, whicli are not placed in pairs but alternately to the right and left in successive segments. In other animals of this order, I which I have as yet ^ only cursorily examin- [ ed, further differences I will no doubt occur. But why, in two orders so nearly allied to each ^ other, should we find in the one such a con- stancy, in the other such a variability, of the same highly im- portant organ ? From the schoolmen we need expect no explanation, they will either decline the dis- cussion of the " wherefore " as foreign to their province, as lying beyond the boundaries of Natural History, or seek to put down the importunate question by means of a sounding paraphrase of the facts, abundantly sprinkled with Greek words. As I have unfortunately forgotten my Greek, the second way out of the difficulty is closed to me ; but as I luckily reckon myself not amongst the incorporated masters, but, to use Baron von Liebig's expression, amongst the " promenaders on the outskirts Fig. 16.6 Fig. 15. 5 = Fig. 15. « Fig.lG. I. Liver. Heart of a young Anilocra. Abdomen of tlio male of Entoniscus Cancrorum, h. Heart. Chap. YI. STEUCTURE OF THE HEART. 43 of Natural History," this affected hesitation of the schoolmen cannot dissuade me from seeking an answer, which indeed presents itself most naturally from Dar- win's point of yiew. As not only the Tanaides (which reasons elsewhere stated (vide supra) justify us in regarding as particularly nearly related to the primitive Isopod) and the Amphipoda, but also the Decapod Crustacea, possess a heart with three pairs of fissures essentially in the same position ; and as the same position of the heart recurs (vide infra) even in the embryos of the Mantis- Shrimps (Squilla), in which the heart of the adult animal, and even, as I have elsewhere shown, that of the larvae when stUl far from maturity, extends in the form of a long tube with numerous openings far into the abdomen, we must unhesitatingly regard the heart of the Amphipoda as the primitive form of that organ in the Edriophthalma. As, moreover, in these animals the blood flows fi-om the respiratory organs to the heart without vessels, it is very easy to see how advantageous it must be to them to have these organs as much approximated as possible. We have reason to regard as the primitive mode of respiration, that occur- ring in Tanais (vide supra). Now, where, as in the majority of the Isopoda, branchias were developed upon the abdomen, the position and structure of the heart underwent a change, as it approached them more nearly, but without the reproduction of a common plan for these earlier modes of structure, either because this transformation of the heart took place only after the 44 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VI. division of the primary form into subordinate groups, or because, at least at the time of this division, the varying heart had not yet become fixed in any new form. Where, on the contrary, respiration remained with the anterior part of the body, — whether in the primitive fashion of Zoea, as in the Tanaides, or by the development of branchiae on the thorax, as in the Am- phipoda, — the primitive form of the heart was inherited unchanged, because any variations which might make their appearance were rather injurious than advan- tageous, and disappeared again immediately. I close this series of isolated examples with an obser- vation which indeed only half belongs to the province of the Crustacea to which these pages ought to be con- fined, and which also has no further connexion with the preceding circumstances than that of being an " in- telligible and intelligence-bringing fact " only fi'om the point of view of Darwin's theory. To-day as I was opening a specimen of Lepas anatifera in order to compare the animal with the description in Darwin's 'Monograph on the Subclass Cirripedia,' I found in the shell of this Cirripede, a blood-red Annelide, with a short, flat body, about half an inch long and two lines in breadth, with twenty-five body-segments, and without projecting setigerous tubercles or jointed cirri. The small cephalic lobe bore four eyes and five tentacles ; each body-segment had on each side at the margin a tuft of simple sets© directed obliquely upwards, and at some distance from this, upon the ventral surface, a group of thicker setse with a strongly uncinate bideutate apex. Chap: VI. ANNELIDE PARASITIC IN LEPAS. 45 There was above each of the lateral tufts of bristles a brancbia, simple on a few of the foremost segments, and then strongly arborescent to the end of the body. The animal, a female filled with ova, evidently, from these characters, belongs to the family of the Amphinomidae ; the only family the members of which, being excellent swimmers, live in the open sea. That this animal had not strayed accidentally into the Lepas, but appertained to it as a regular and per- manent guest, is evidenced by its considerable size in proportion to the narrow entrance of the test of the Lepas, by the complete absence of the iridescence which usually distinguishes the skin of free Annelides and especially of the Amphinomidae, by the formation and position of the inferior sette, &c. But that a worm be- longing to this particular family Amphinomidae living in the high sea, occurs as a guest in the Lepas, which also floats in the sea attached to wood, &c., is at once intelligible from the stand-point of the Darwinian theory, whilst the relationship of this parasite to the free-living worms of the open sea remains perfectly unintelligible under the supposition that it was independently created for dwelKng in the Lepas. But however favourable the examples hitherto re- ferred to may be for Darwin, the objection may be raised against them, and that with perfect justice, that they are only isolated facts, which, when the considera- tions founded upon them are carried far beyond what is immediately given, may only too easily lead us from the right path, with the deceptive glimmer of an ignis 46 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VI. fatuus. The higher the structure to be raised, the wider must be the assuring base of well-sifted facts. Let us turn then to a wider field, that of the develop- mental history of the Crustacea, upon which science has already brought together a varied abundance of remarkable facts, which, however, have remained a barren accumulation of unmanageable raw-material, and let us see how, under Darwin's hand, these scattered stones unite to form a well-jointed structm-e, in which everything, bearing and being borne, finds its significant place. Under Darwin's hand ! for I shall have nothing to do except just to place the building stones in the position which his theory indicates for them. " When kings build, the carters have to work." Chap. VIT. DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY. 47 CHAPTER VII. DEVELOPMENTAL HISTOKY OF PODOPHTHALMA. Let us first glance over the extant facts. Among tlie Stalk-eyed Crustacea (Podophthalma) we know only a very few species whicli quit the egg in the form of their parents, with the full number of well- jointed appendages to the body. Tliis is the case accord- ing to Eathke' in the Em-opean fresh-water Crayfish, and according to Westwood in a West Indian Land Crab (Gecarcinus). Both exceptions therefore belong to the small number of Stalk-eyed Crustacea which live in fresh water or on the land, as indeed in many other cases fresh-water and terrestrial animals undergo no transformations, whilst their allies in the sea have a metamorphosis to undergo. I may refer to the Earth- worms and Leeches among the Annelida, which chiefly belong to the land and to fresh water,— to the Flanarise of the fresh waters and the Tetrastemma of the sparingly saline Baltic among the Turbellaria, — to the Pulmonate Gasteropoda, and to the Branchiferous Gasteropoda of the fresh waters, the young of which (according to ' Authorities are cited only for facts which I have had no opportunity of confirming. 48 HISTOKY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. Troscliel's ' Handb. der Zoologie ') have no ciliated buccal lobes, although such organs are possessed by the very similar Periwinkles (Littorina). All the marine forms of this section appear to be sub- ject to a more or less considerable metamorphosis. This appears to be only inconsiderable in the common Lobster, the young of Nvhich, according to Van Beneden, are distinguished from the adult animal, by having their feet furnished, like those of Mysis, with a swim- ming branch projecting freely outwards. From a figure given by Couch the appendages of the abdomen and tail also appear to be wanting. Far more profound is the difference of the youngest brood from the sexually mature animal in by far the greater majority of the Podophthalma, which quit the egg in the form of Zoea. This young form occurs, so far as our present observations go, in all the Crabs, with the sole exception of the single species investigated by Westwood. I say species, and not genus, for in the same genus, Gecardnus, Vaughan Thompson found Zoea-brood,^ which is also met with in other terrestrial crabs'*^ (Oci/pof^a, Gelasimus, &c.). All the Anomura 2 Bell (' Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust.' p. xlv.) considers Mmself justified in " eliminating" Thompson's observation at once, because he could only have examined ovigerous females preserved La alcohol. But any one -who had paid so much attention as Thompson to the development of these animals, must have been well able to decide with certainty upon eggs, if not too far from maturity or badly preserved, whether a Zoiia would be produced from them. Moreover, Ihe mode of life of the Land- Grabs is in favour of Thompson. " Once in the year," says Troschel's ' Handbuch der Zoologie,' " they migrate in great crowds to the sea in order to deposit their eggs, and afterwards return much exhausted Chap. VII. ZOEA-BKOOD. 49 seem likewise to commence their lives as Zoese : witness the Porcellanm, the TatuLra (Hijjjoa emerita) and the Hermit Crabs. Among the Macrura we are ac- quainted with the same earliest form principally in several Shrimps and Prawns, such as Crangon (Du Cane), Caridina (Joly), Hijpjpolyte, Palcemon, Aljplieus, &c. Lastly, it is not improbable, that the youngest brood of the Mantis-Shrimps (Squilla) is also in the same case. The most important peculiarities which distinguish this Zoea-brood from the adult animal, are as fol- lows : — The middle-body with its appendages, those five pairs of feet to which these animals owe their name of Deca- poda, is either entirely wanting, or scarcely indicated ; the abdomen and tail are destitute of appendages, and the latter consists of a single piece. The mandibles, as in the Insecta, have no palpi. The maxillipedes, of which the third pair is often still wanting, are not yet brought into the service of the mouth, but appear in the form of biramose natatory feet. Branchise are wanting, or where their first rudiments may be detected as small verruciform prominences, these are dense cell-masses, through which the blood does not yet flow, and which therefore have nothing to do with respiration. An in- terchange of the gases of the water and blood may occur all over the thin-skinned surface of the body ; but the towards their dwelling places, which are reached only by a few." For what purpose would be these destructive migrations in species whose young quit the egg and the mother as terrestrial animals ? E 50 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. lateral parts of the carapace may unhesitatingly be in- dicated as the chief seat of respiration. They consist, exactly as described by Leydig in the Daphniee, of an outer and inner lamina, the space between which is traversed by numerous transverse partitions dilated at their ends; the spaces between these partitions are penetrated by a more abundant flow of blood than occurs anywhere else in the body of the Zoea. To this Fig.'l?.3 Fig. IS.* may be added that a constant current of fresh water passes beneath the carapace in a direction from behind forwards, maintained as in the adult animal, by a foHa- ceous or linguiform aj)pendage of the second pair of maxillse (fig. 18). The addition of fine coloured par- ticles to the water allows this current of water to be easily detected even in small Zoese. 3 Fig. 17. Zoea of a Marsh Crab (Cydograpsus?), magn. 45 diam. •* Fig. 18. Maxilla of the second pair in the same species, magn. 180 diam. Chap. Vn. ZOEiE OF TEUE CEABS. 51 The Zoece of tlie Crabs (fig. 17) are usually distin- guished by long, spiniform processes of the carapace. One of these projects upwards from the middle of the back, a second downwards from the forehead, and fre- quently there is a shorter one on each side near the posterior inferior angles of the carapace. All these processes are, however, wanting in Maia according to Couch, and in Eurymme according to Kinahan; and in a third species of the same group of the OxyrhyncM (belonging or nearly allied to the genus Achseus) I also find only an inconsiderable dorsal spine, whilst the fore- head and sides are unarmed. This is another example warning us to be cautious in deductions from analogy. Nothing seemed more probable than to refer back the beak-like formation of the forehead in the Oxyrhynchi to the frontal process of the Zoea, and now it appears that the young of the Oxyrhynchi are really quite destitute of any such process. The following are more important peculiarities of the Zoeae of the Crabs, although less striking than these processes of the cara- pace which, in combination with the large eyes, often give them so smgular an appearance: — the anterior (inner) antennso are simple, not jointed, and furnished at the extremity with from two to three olfactory fila- ments; the posterior (outer) antennas frequently run out into a remarkably long spine-like process (" styli- form process," Spence Bate), and bear, on the outside, an appendage, which is sometimes very minute ("squami- form process " of Spence Bate), corresponding with the E 2 52 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. antennal scale of the Prawns,* and the first rudiment of the future flagellum is often already recognisable. Of natatory feet (afterwards maxillipeds) only two pairs are present ; the third (not, as Spence Bate thinks, the first) is entirely w^anting, or, like the five following pairs of feet, present only as a minute bud. The tail, of very variable form, always bears ihree pairs of setae at its hinder margin. The Zoeae of the Crabs usually Figs. 19— 23.S maintain themselves in the water in such a manner that the dorsal spine stands upwards, the abdomen is bent forwards, the inner branch of the natatory feet is directed forwards, and the outer one outwards and upwards. ^ In a memoir on the metamorphoses of the Porcellanx I have errone- ously described this appendage as the " flagelhmi." ^ Tails of the Zoeis of various Crabs. Fig. 19. Pinnofheres. Fig. 20. Sesarma. Fig. 21. Xantho. Figs. 22 and 23 of unknown origin. Chap. VII. ZOE^ OF PORCELLANiE. 53 It is further to be remarked that the Zoesa of tlie crab's, as also of the Porcellanm, of the Tatmi-a and of the Shrimps and Prawns, are enveloped, on escaping from the egg, by a membrane veiling the spinous processes of the carapace, the seta3 of the feet, and the antennae, and that they cast this in a few hours. In Acliseus I have observed that the tail of this earliest larval skin resembles that of the larvse of Shrimps and Prawns, and the same appears to be the case in Maia (see Bell, ' Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust.,' p. 44). Widely as they seem to differ from them at the first glance, the Zoeae of the Porcellanse (fig. 24) approach those of the true Crabs very closely. The antennae, organs of the mouth, and nata- tory feet, exhibit the same structure. But the tail bears five pairs of setae, and the dorsal spine is wanting, whilst, on the contrary, the frontal process and the lateral spines are of extraordinary length, and directed straight forward and backward. The Zoea of the Tatuira (fig. 25) also appears to differ but little from ? Fig. 24. Zoea of PorceUma stellicola, F. Miill. Magn. 15 diam. Fig. 24.' 54 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. Fig. 25, those of the true Ci-abs, which it likewise resembles in its mode of locomo- tion. The carapace possesses only a short, broad frontal process ; the posterior margin of the tail is edged with numerous short setae. The Zoea of the Hermit Crabs (fig. 26) possesses the simple inner antennae of the Zoea of the true Crabs ; the outer antennae bear upon the outside on a short stalk a lamella of considerable size ana- logous to the scale of the antennae of the Prawns ; on the inside, a short, spine-like pro- cess ; and between the two the flagellum, still short, but already fur- nished with two apical 8 Fig. 25. Zoea of the Ta- tuira {Hippa emerita), magn. 45 diam. s Fig. 26. Zoea of a small j'ig. 26.' Hermit Crab, magn. 45 diam. Chap. VII. ZOE^ OF MACRURA. 55 setae. As in the Crabs, there are only two pairs of well-developed natatory feet (maxillipedes), but the third pair is also present in the form of a two-jointed stump of considerable size, although still destitute of setee. The tail bears five pairs of setae. The little animal usually holds itself extended straight in the water, with the head du-ected downwards. This is also the position in which we usually see the Zoeae of the Shrimps and Prawns (fig. 27), which agree in their general appearance with those of the Hermit Crabs. Between the large compound eyes there is in them a small median eye. The inner antennae bear, at the end of a basal joint sometimes of considerable length, on the inside a plumose seta, which also occurs in the Hermit Crabs, and on the outside a short terminal joint with one or more olfactory filaments. The outer antennae exhibit a well-developed and sometimes dis- tinctly articulated scale, and within this usually a spini- form process ; the flagellum appears generally to be still wanting. The third pair of maxillipedes seems to be always present, at least in the form of considerable rudiments. The spatuliform caudal lamina bears from five to six pairs of setae on its hinder margin. The development of the Zoea-brood to the sexually mature animal was traced by Spence Bate in Carcinus mxnas. He proved that the metamorphosis is a per- fectly gradual one, and that no sharply separated stages of development, like the caterpillar and pupa of the Lepidoptera, could be defined in it. Unfortunately we possess only this single complete series of observations, 5.6 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. and its results cannot be regarded at once as uni- versally applicable ; thus the young Hermit Crabs retain tbe general aspect and mode of locomotion of Zoeae, Avhilst the rudiments of the thoracic and abdo- minal feet are growing, and then, when these come into action, appear at once in a perfectly new form, which differs from that of the adult animal chiefly by the complete symmetry of the body and by the presence of four pairs of well-developed natatory feet on the abdo- men.^" The development of the Palinuridse seems to be very peculiar. Glaus found in the ova of the Spiny Lobster (Palinurus), embryos with a completely segmented body, but wanting the appendages of the tail, abdomen, and last two segments of the middle- body.; they possess a single median and considerably compound eye ; the anterior antennae are simple, the posterior furnished with a small 1" Glaucothoe Peronii, M.-Edw., may be a yoimg and still symmetrical Pagurus of this kind. 1' Fig. 27. Zoea of a Palxmon residing upon Phizostoma cruciatum, iiess., magn. 45 diam. Fig. Chap. VII. NAUPLIUS-BEOOD OP PBNEUS. 57 secondary branch ; the mandibles have no palpi ; the maxillipedes of the third pair, like the two following pairs of feet, are divided into two branches of nearly equal length ; whilst the last of the existing pairs of feet and the second pair of maxillipedes bear only an inconsider- able secondary branch. Coste, as is well known, asserts that he has bred young Phyllosomata from the ova of this lobster — a statement that requires further proof, especially as the more recent investigations of Claus upon Phyllosoma by no means appear to be in its favour. The large compound eyes, which usually soon become moveable, and sometimes stand upon long stalks even in the earliest period, as well as the carapace, which covers the entire fore-body, indicate at once that the position of the larvae hitherto considered, notwithstand- ing all their differences, is under the Podophthalma. But not a single characteristic of this section is retained by the brood of some Prawns belonging to the genus Peneus or in its vicinity. These quit the egg with an unsegmented ovate body, a median frontal eye, and three pairs of natatory feet, of which the anterior are simple, and the other two biramose — in fact, in the larval form, so common among the lower Crustacea, to which 0. P. Miiller gave the name of Nauplius. No trace of a carapace ! no trace of the paired eyes ! no trace of masticating organs near the mouth which is overarched by a helmet-like hood ! In the case of one of these species the intermediate forms which lead from the Nauplius to the Prawn, have been discovered in a nearly continuous series. 58 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. The youngest Nauplius (fig. 28) is immediately fol- lowed by forms in which a fold of skin runs across the back behind the third pair of feet, and four pairs of stout processes (rudiments of new limbs) sprout forth on the ventral surface. Within the third pair of feet, powerful mandibles are develojped. Fig. 28." In a subsequent moult the new limbs (maxillae, and anterior and intermediate maxillipedes) come into ac- tion, and in this way the Nauplius becomes a Zoea (fig. 29), agreeing perfectly with the Zoea of the Crabs in the number of the appendages of the body, although very different in form and mode of locomotion and even in many particulars of internal structure. The chief 1^ Pig. 28. Nauplius of a Pra-mi, magn. 45 diam. Chap. VII. DEVELOPMENT OF PENlilUS. 69 organs of motion are still the two anterior pairs of feet, which are slender and furnished with long setce ; the third pair of feet loses its branches, and becomes con- verted into mandibles destitute of palpi. The labrum acquires a spine di- rected forward and of considerable size, which occurs in all the Zoese of allied species. The bira- mose maxillipedes appear to assist but slightly in locomo- tion. The forked tail reminds us rather of the forms occur- ring in the lower Crustacea, especi- ally the Copepoda, than of the spatuli- form caudal plate which characterises the Zoese of Alpheus, Palmmon, Eippolyte, and other Prawns, of the Hermit Crabs, the Tatuira and the PorceUanse. The heart possesses only one pair of fissures, and has no muscles traversing its interior like trabecule, whilst in other Zoe® two pairs of fissures and an interior appa- " Fig. 29. Young Zoea of the same Prawn, mogn. 45 diam. Fig. 29.13 HISTORY OF CEUSTACEA. Chap. VII. ratus of trabecule are always distinct- ly recognisable. During this Zoeal period the paired eyes, the segments of the middle-body and abdomen, the posterior maxilli- pedes, the lateral caudal apjDendages and the stump-like rudiments of the feet of the middle- body are formed (fig. 30). The caudal appendages sprout forth like other limbs freely on the ventral sui'face, whilst in other Prawns, the Porcel- lanse, &c., they are produced in the in- terior of the spatuli- form caudal j^late. As the feet of the middle-body come " Fig. 30. Older Zoca of the same Pra\ni, magn. 45 diam. Chap. VII. DEVELOPMENT OF PENEUS. 61 into action, simultaneously with other profound changes, the Zoea passes into the Mysis- or Schizopod-form (fig.31). The antennae cease to serve for locomotion, their place is taken by the thoracic feet, furnished with long setse, and by the long abdomen which just before was laboriously dragged along as a useless burden, but now, with its powerful muscles, jerks the animal through the water in a series of lively jumps. The anterior antennae have lost theii- long setae, and by the side of the last (fourth) joint, en- dowed with olfactory filaments, there appears a second branch, which is at first of a single joint. The previously multi-articulate outer branch of the posterior antennae has become a simple lamella, the antennal scale of the Prawn ; beside this appears the stump-like rudiment of the flagellum, probably as a new formation, the inner branch dis- appearing entirely. The five new pairs of feet are biramose, the inner branch short and simple, the outer one longer, annulated at the end, furnished with long set^, and " Fig. 31. Mysis-foim of the same Prawn, magn. 45 diam. I' ig. 31. >5 62 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. kept, as in Mysis, in constant whirling motion. The heart acquires new fissures, and interior muscular trabeculae. During the Mysis-^eviod, the auditory organs in the basal joint of the anterior antennae are formed ; the inner branches of the first three pairs of feet are deve- loped into chelae and the two hinder pairs into ambula- tory feet; palpi sprout from the mandibles, branchiae on the thorax, and natatory feet on the abdomen. The spine on the labrum becomes reduced in size. In this way the animal gradually approaches the Prawn-form, in which the median eye has become indistinct, the spine of the labrum, and the outer branches of the cheliferous and ambulatory feet have been lost, the mandibular palpi and the abdominal feet have acquired distinct joints and setae, and the branchiae come into action. In another Prawn, the various larval states of which may be easily recognised as belonging to the same series by the presence of a dark-yellow, sharply-defined spot surrounding the median eye, the youngest Zoea (fig. 32), probably produced from the Nauplius, agrees in all essential particulars with the species just de- scribed ; its further development is, however, very dif- ferent, especially in that neither the feet of the middle, nor those of the hind-body are formed simultaneously, and that a stage of development comparable to Mysis in the number and structure of the limbs does not occur. Traces of the outer maxillipedes make their ajipear- ance betimes. Then feet appear upon four segments Chap. VII. DEVELOPMENT OF PRAWNS. 63 of tlie middle-body, and these are biramose on the three anterior segments, and simple, the inner branch being deficient, on the fourth segment. On the inner branches the chelee are developed ; the outer branches are lost before an inner branch has made its appearance on the fourth segment (fig. 32). The latter again becomes destitute of ap- pendages, so that in this case at an early period four, and at a later only three, segments of the middle-body bear limbs. The fifth segment is still entirely wanting, whilst all the abdominal seg- ments have also acquired limbs, and this one after the other, from before back- wards. The adult animal, as shown by the three pairs of chelae, will certainly be very nearly allied to the preceding species." 16 Fig. 32. Youngest (observed) Zoiia of another Prawn. The mmute buds of the thud pair of maxillipedes are visible. The forma- tion of the abdominal segments has commenced. Paired eves still wanting. Magn. 45 diam. The oldest observed larvas (see fig. 33) arc characterised by the extraordinary length of the flageUa of the outer antennse, and in tins Fig. 32. 10 64 HISTORY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. YII. The youngest larva of the Schizopod genus Eu- phamia observed by Claus, stands very near the youngest Zoea of our Prawns ; but whilst its anterior antennae are already biramose, and it therefore appears to be more advanced, it still wants the middle maxilli- pedes. In it also Claus found the heart furnished with only a single pair of fissures. Do not Nauplius-like states in this case also precede the Zoea ? Fig. 33. '8 The developmental history of Mysis, the near re- lationship of which with the Shrimps and Prawns has recently again been generally recognised, has been respect resemble the larva of Serfjestes found by Glaus near Messina (Zeitschr. fiir Wiss. Zool. Bd. xiii. Taf. 27, fig. 14). This unusual length of the antenna) leads to the supposition that they belong to our com- monest Prawn, which is very frequently eaten, and is most nearly allied to Peneus setiferus of Florida. Glaus's Acaiitliosoma (I. c. fig. 13) is like the younger Mysis-iorm of the larva figured by me in the ' Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte,' 1836, Taf. 2, fig. 18, and which I am inclined to refer to Sicyonia carinata. Fig. 33. Older larva produced from the Zoea represented in fig. 32. The last segment and the last two paii'S of feet of the middle-body are wanting. Magn. 20 diam. Chap. VII. DEVELOPMENT OF MTSIS. 65 described in detail by Van Beneden. So far as I have tested tliem I can only confirm his statements. The development of the embryo commences with the forma- tion of the tail ! This makes its appearance as a simple lobe, the dorsal surface of which is turned towards and closely applied to that of the embryo. (The young of other Stalk-eyed Crustacea are, as is well known, bent in the egg in such a manner that the ventral surfaces of the anterior and posterior halves of the body are turned towards eacb other, — in these, therefore, the dorsal, and in Mysis the ventral surface appears convex.) The tail soon acquires the furcate form with which, we made acquaintance in the last Prawn-Zoea described. Then two pairs of tbick ensiform appendages make their appearance at the opposite end of the body, and behind tbese a pair of tubercles which are easily over- looked. These are the auteunse and mandibles. The egg-membrane now bursts, before any internal organ, or even any tissue, except the cells of the cutaneous layer, is formed. The young animal might be called a Nauplius ; but essentially there is nothing but a rough copy of a Nauplius-skin, almost like a new egg- membrane, within which the Mysis is developed. The ten pairs of appendages of the fore- (maxillre, maxilli- pedes) and middle-body make their appearance simul- taneously, as do the five pairs of abdominal feet at a later period. Soon after the young Mysis casts the Nau- plius-envelope it quits tlie brood-pouch of the mother.'^ 19 Van Beneden, who regards the eye-peduncles as limbs, cannot however avoid remarking upon Mysis: "Co pe'dicule n'apparait F 66 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VJI. For some time, owing to an undue importance being ascribed to the want of a particular branchial cavity, Mysis, Leucifer, and Phyllosoma were referred to the Stomapoda, which are now again limited, as originally by Latreille, to the Mantis-shrimps (Squilla), the Glass- shrimps (Erichihm) and their nearest allies. Of the developmental history of these we have hitherto been acquainted with only isolated fragments. The tracing of the development in the egg is rendered difficult by the circumstance, that the Mantis-shrimps do not, like the Decapoda, carry their spawn about with them, but deposit it in the subterranean passages inhabited by them in the form of thin, round, yellow plates. The spawn is consequently exceedingly difficult to procure, and unfortunately it becomes spoilt in a day when it is removed from its natural hatching place, wliilst on the contrary the progress of development may be followed for weeks together in the eggs of a single Crab kept in confinement. The eggs of Squilla, like those removed from the body of the Crab, die because they are de- prived of the rapid stream of fresh water which the mother drives through her hole for the purpose of her own respiration. The accompanying representation of the embryo of Squilla shows that it possesses a long, segmented abdomen without apj)endages, a bilobate tail, six j)airs of limbs, and a short heart ; the latter only pulsates weakly and slowly. If it acquires more limbs before aucurpjr.pnt commo les autics appendices, at parait avoir une autre valeur moiphologique." Chap. VIL DEVELOPMENT OF SQUILL A. 67 Fig. 34.2 exclusion, the youngest larva must stand on the same level as the youngest larva of jEhiphausia observed by Claus. Of the two larval forms at present known which are with certainty to be ascribed, if not to Squilla, at least to a Stoma- pod, I pass over the younger one ^' as its limbs cannot be positively interpreted, and will only mention that in it the last three abdominal segments are still destitute of appendages. The older larva (fig. 35), which resembles the mature Squilla especially in the structure of the great raptorial feet and of the preceding pair, stni wants the six pairs of feet fol- lowing the rapto- rial feet. The cor- responding body- segments are already weU developed, an unpaired eye 20 Fig. 34. Embryo of a Squilla, magn. 45 diam. o. heart. 'Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte,' 1863. Taf. 1. ^ Fig. 35. Older larva (Zoiia) of a Stomapod, magn. 15 diam. F 2 Fig 35. 68 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VII. is still present, the anterior antenna; are already bira- mose, whilst the fiagellum is wanting in the posterior, and the mandibles are destitute of palpi ; the four anterior abdominal segments bear biramose natatoiy feet, with- out branchiae ; the fifth abdominal segment has no appendages, and this is also the ease with the tail, which still appears as a simple lamina, fringed on the hinder margin with numerous short teeth. It is evident that tlie larva stands essentially in the grade of Zoea. Chap. VIII, DEVELOPMENT OF LIGIA. 69 CHAPTER VIII. DEVELOPMENTAL HISTOET OP EDEIOPHTHALMA. Less varied than that of the Stalk-eyed Crustacea is the mode of deYelopment of the Isopoda and Amphi- poda, which Leach united in the section Edriophthalma, or Crustacea with sessile eyes. The Eock-Slaters {Ligia) may serve as an example of the development of the Isopoda. In these, as in Mysis, the caudal portion j)J of the embryo is bent not downwards, but up- wards ; as in Mysis also, a larval membrane is first of all formed, within ^'^ which the Slater is developed. In Mysis this first larval akin may be compared to a JSTauplius ; in Ligia it appears like a maggot quite destitute of appendages, but pro- duced into a long simple tail (fig, 37). The egg-mem- brane is retained longer than in Mysis; it bursts only when the limbs of the young Slater are already par- tially developed in their full number. The dorsal sur- ' Fig. 36. Embryo oi Ligia in the egg, mogn. 15 diam. B. yelk; L. liver. 70 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VIII. face of the Slater is united to the larval skin a little behind the head. At this point, when the union has been dissolved a little before the change of skin, there is a foHaceous appendage, which exists only for a short time, and disappears before the young Slater quits the brood-pouch of the mother. Fig. 37.' t The young animal, when it begins to take care of itself, resembles the old ones in almost all parts, except one important difference ; it possesses only six, instead of seven pairs of ambulatory feet ; and the last segment of the middle-body is but slightly developed aud destitute of appendages. It need hardly be mentioned that the sexual peculiarities are not yet developed, and that in the males the handlike enlargements of the anterior ambulatory feet and the copulatory appendages are still deficient. ^ Fig. 37. Maggot-like larva of Ligia, magn. 15 diam. B. remains of the egg-membrane. We see on the lower surface, from before back- wards : — the anterior aud posterior antennsB, the mandibles, the anterior and posterior maxillaj, maxillipedes, six ambulatory feet, the last seg- ment of the middle-body destitute of appendages, iive abdominal feet, and the caudal feet. Chap. VIII. DEVELOPMENT OP ISOPODA. 71 To the question, how far the development of Ligia is repeated in the other Isopoda, I can only give an unsatisfactory answer. The curvature of the embryo upwards instead of downwards was met with by me as well as by Eathke in Idothea, and likewise in Cassidina, Philoseia, Tanais, and the Bopyrida3,— indeed, I failed to find it in none of the Isopoda examined for this purpose. In Cassidina also the first larval skin without appendages is easily detected; it is destitute of the long tail, but is strongly bent in the egg, as in Ligia, and consequently cannot be mistaken for an "inner egg- membrane." This, however, might happen in Philoseia, in which the /-f^^^^^^^^>v larval skin is closely applied to the , ' egg-membrane (fig. 38), and is only \f^^^^^^J to be explained as the larval skin by ^^^^Wyf a reference to Ligia and Cassidina. Fig. 38.3 The foliaceous appendage on the back has long been known in the young of the common Water Slater (Asellus).* That the last pair of feet of the thorax ^ Fig. 38. Embryo of a Philoseia in the egg, magn. 25 diam. Leydig has compared this foliaceous appendage of the Water Slaters with the " green gland " or " shell-gland " of other Crustacea, assuming that the green gland has no efferent duct and appealing to the fact that the two organs occur " in the same place." This interpretation is by no means a happy one. In the fii'st place we may easily ascertain in Leuci/er, as was also found to be the case by Glaus, that the " green gland" really opens at the end of the process described by Milne- Edwards as a "tubercule auditif" and by Spence Bate as an "olfactory denticle." And, secondly, the position is about as dif- ferent as it can well be. In the one case a paired gland, opening at the base of the posterior antennsB, and therefore on the lower surface of the second segment ; in the other an unpaired structui-e rising 72 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VHL is wanting in tlie yoimg of the Wood-lice (PorcelUonides, M.-Edw.) and Fish-lice (Cymothoadiens, M.-Edw.) has already been noticed by Milne-Edwards. This applies also to the Box-Slaters (Idothea), to the viviparous Globe- Slaters (Sphseroma) and Shield-Slaters (Cassidina), to the Bopyridte (Bopyrus, Entoniscus, Cryptoniscus, n. g.), and to the Cheliferous Slaters (Tanais), and therefore probably to the great majority of the Isopoda. All the other limbs are usually well developed in the young Isopoda. In Tanais alone, all the abdominal feet are wanting (but not those of the tail) ; they are developed simultaneously with the last pair of feet of the thorax. The last pair of feet on the middle-body of the larva, consequently the penultimate pair in the adult animal, is almost always similar in structure to the preceding pair. A remarkable excep- tion is, however, presented in this respect by Cryptonis- cus and Entoniscus, — re- markable as a confirmation ^ of Darwin's proposition that " parts developed in an unusual manner are very vari- able," for in the j)eculiarly-formed pair of feet there exists the greatest possible difference between the three species hitherto observed. In Cryptoniscus (fig. 89) this last foot is thin and rod-like ; in Etitonisms Can- in the median line of the back hehind the seventh segment, (" behind the boundary line of the first thoracic segment," Leydig). ^ Fig. 39. Embryo of Cryptoniscus planarioides, mngn. 90 diam. 8 Fig. 40. Last foot of the middle-body of the larva of Entoniscus Forcellanm, magn. 180 diam. Chap. VIII, EETEOGRADE METAMORPHOSIS. 73 crorum remarkably long and furnished with a strongly thickened hand and a peculiarly constructed chela ; in EntonisGus Porcdlanm yery sliort, imperfectly jointed, and with a large ovate terminal joint (fig. 40). Some Isopods undergo a considerable change imme- diately before the attainment of sexual maturity. This is the case with the males of Tanais which have already been noticed, and, according to Hesse, with the Pra- nizes, in whicli both sexes are said to pass into the form known as Anceus. But Spence Bate, a careful observer, states that he has seen females of the form of Praniza laden with eggs far advanced in their development. In this order we meet for the fii-st time with an extensive retrograde metamorphosis as a consequence of a parasitic mode of life. Even in some Fish-lice (Cymothoa) the young are lively swimmers, and the adults stiff, stupid, heavy fellows, whose short clinging feet are capable of but little movement. In the Bopy- ridse (Boj>yrus, Phryxus, Kepone, &c., which might have been conveniently left in a single genus), which are parasitic on Crabs, Lobsters, &c., taking up their abode chiefly in the branchial cavity, the adult females are usually quite destitute of eyes ; the antennae are rudimentary ; the broad body is frequently unsymme- trically developed in consequence of the confined space ; its segments are more or less amalgamated with each other ; the feet are stunted, and the appendages of the abdomen transformed from natatory feet with long setae into foliaceous or tongue-shaped and some- times ramified branchiai. In the dwarfish males the 74 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA.. Chap. VIII. eyes, antennfe, and feet, are usually better preserved than in the females; but on the other hand all the appendages of the abdomen have not unfrequently dis- appeared, and sometimes every trace of segmentation. In the females of Entonhcus, which are found in the body-cavity of Crabs and Porcellanse, the eyes, antennae, and buccal organs, the segmentation of the vermiform body, and in one spe- cies (fig. 41) the whole of the limbs, disappear almost without leaving a trace ; and Criji^tonis- cus planarioides would almost be regarded as a Flatworm rather than an Isopod, if its eggs and young did not betray its Crustacean nature. Among the males of these various Bopyridae, that of Entoniseus Porcellanse occupies the lowest place ; it is confined all its life to six pairs of feet, which are reduced to shapeless rounded lumps. The Amphipoda are distinguish- , able from the Isopoda at an early period in the egg by the different position of the embryo, the hinder extremity of which is bent downwards. In all the ani- 7 Fig. 41. Entoniseus Cancrorum, female, magn. 3 times. 8 Fig. 42. Cryptoniscus iilanarioides, female, inagn. 3 times. ^ Fig. 43. Embryo of a Corophium, magn. 90 diam. Chap. VIII. DEVELOPMENT OF AMPHIPODA. 75 mals of tliis order which have been examined for it,'" a peculiar structure makes its appearance very early on the anterior part of the back, by which the embryo is attached to the " inner egg-membrane," and which has been called the " micropylar apparatus," but improperly as it seems to me." It will remind us of the union of the young Isopoda with the larval membrane and of the un- paired " adherent organ " on the nape of the Cladocera, which is remarkably developed in Evadne and persists throughout life ; but in Dafhnia pulex, according to Leydig, although present in the young animals, disap- pears without leaving a trace in the adults. The young animal, whilst still in the egg, acquires the full number of its segments and limbs. In cases where segments are amalgamated together, such as the last two segments of the thorax in Dulichia, the last abdominal segments and the tail in Gammarus ambulans and Coro- "> In the genpi-a Orchestoidea, Orchestia, Allorchestes, Montagiia, Batea n. g., Amphiloolms, Atylus, Microdeutopus, Leucoihoe, Melita, Gammarus (according to Meissner and La Valette), AmpMthoe, Cerapus, Cyrtophium, CoropMum, Dulichia, Protella and Caprella. " Little as a name may actually aifect the facts, we ought certainly to confine the name " micropyle" to canals of the egg-membrane, which serve for the entrance of the semen. But the outer cgg-mcmbrane passes over the " micropylar apparatus " of the Amphipoda without any perforation, according to Meissner's and La Valutte's own state- ments ; it appears never to be present before fecundation, attains its greatest development at a subsequent period of the ovular life, and tlie delicate canals which penetrate it do not even seem to be always pre- sent, indeed it seems to belong to the embryo rather than to the egg- membrane. I have never been able to convince myself that the so- called " inner egg-membrane " is really of this nature, and not perhaps the earliest larva skin, not formed until after impregnation, as might be supposed with reference to Ligia, Cassidlna and Philoscia. 76 HISTOKT OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VIII. pliium dentaium, n. sp., and the last abdominal segments and the tail in Brachyscelus,^^ or where one or more segments are deficient, as in Dulichia and the CapreUse, we find the same fusion and the same deficiencies in young animals taken out of the brood-pouch of their mother. Even peculiarities in the structure of the limbs, so far as they are common to both sexes, are usually well-marked in the newly hatched young, so that the latter generally differ from their parents only by their stouter form, the smaller number of the an- tennal joints and olfactory filaments, and also of the setae and teeth with which the body or feet are armed, and perhaps by the comparatively larger size of the secondary flagellum. An exception to this rule is pre- sented by the HyperiufB which usually live upon Aca- lepha?. In these the young and adults often have a remarkably different appearance; but even in these there is no new formation of body-segments and limbs, but only a gradual transformation of these parts." 12 According to Spence Bate, in Bracliyscelus crusculum the fiftli abdominal segment is not amalgamated with the sixth (the taU) but ■with the foiu'th, ■which I should be inclined to doubt, cousidering the close agreement ■which this species otherwise shows ■with the two species that I have investigated. '3 In the young of Hyperia galba Spence Bate did not find any of the abdominal feet, or the last two pairs of thoracic feet, but this very remarkable statement required confii-mation the more because he examined these minute animals only in the dried state. Subsequently I had the wished-for opportunity of tracing the development of a Hyperia which is not uncommon upon Ctenophora, especially Beroc gilva, Eschsch. The youngest larvje from the brood-pouch of the mother already possess the ivltole of the thoracic feet ; on the other hand, like Spence Bate, I cannot fiud those of the abdomen. At first simple enough, all these feet soon become converted, like the anterior Chap. VIH. DEVELOPMENT OF AMPHIPODA. 77 Thus, in order to give a few examples, the powerful chelfB of the antepenultimate pair of feet, of Fhromina foct, into riclily denticulated preliensile feet, and indeed of three diiferent forms, the anterior feet (fig. 44) the two following pairs (fig. 45) and finally the three last paii-s (fig. 46) being similarly con- structed and difierent from the rest. In this form the feet remain for a very long time, whilst the abdominal appendages grow into powerful natatory organs, and the eyes, wliich at first seemed to me to be want- ing, into large hemispheres. In the transition to the form of the adult animal the last three pairs of feet (fig. 49) especially undergo a eon- Figs. 44—49." a Figs. 44-40. Feet of a half-grown Eiiporia Martinezii, n. sp.b Ficrs 47-49. Feet of a nearly adult male of the same species ; 44 and 47 from the first pa>r of anterior feet (gnathopoda) ; 44 and 48 from the first, and 46 aud 40 from the last pair of thoracic feet. Magn. 90 diam. b Named after my valued friend the amiable Spanish zoologist. M. Francisco de Paula Martinez y Saes, at present on a voyage round the world. 78 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VIII. sedentaria, are produced, according to Pagensteclier, from simple feet of ordinary structure ; and vice versa, the chelae on the penultimate pair of feet of the young Brachyscelus, become converted into simple feet. In the young of the last-mentioned genus the long head is drawn out into a conical point and bears remarkably small eyes ; in course of growth, the latter, as in most of the Hyperinte, attain an enormous size, and almost entirely occupy the head, which then appears sphe- rical, &c. The difference of the sexes which, in the Gammarinse is usually expressed chiefly in the structure of the siderable change. The difference between the two sexes is considerable ; the females are distinguished by a very broad thorax, and tlie males (_Lestrigoims) by very long antennas, of which the anterior bear an unusual abundance of olfactory filaments. Their youngest larvsB of course cannot swim ; they are helpless little animals which firmly cling especially to the swimming laminae of their host ; the adult Hyperix, which are not unfrequently met with free in the sea, are, as is well known, the most admirable swimmers in their order. (" II nage avec une rapidite extreme," says Van Beneden of H. LatreiUii M.-Edw.) The transformation of the Hyperix is evidently to be regarded as acquired and not inherited, tliat is to say the late appearance of the abdominal appendages and the peculiar structure of the feet in the yormg are not to be brought into unison with the historical development of the Amphipoda, but to be placed to the account of the parasitic mode of life of the young. As in Brachyscelus, free locomotion has been continued to the adult and not to the young, contrary to the usual method among parasites. Still more remarkable is a similar circumstance in Caligus, among the parasitic Copepoda. The young animal, described by Burmeister as a peculiar genus, Chalimus, lies at anchor upon a fish by means of a cable springing from its foreliead, and having its extremity firmly seated in the skin of the fish. "When sexual maturity is attained, the cable is cut, and the adult Caligi, wliich are admirable swimmers, are not unfrequently captured swimming freely in the sea. (See ' Archiv. fiir Naturg.' 1852, 1, p. 91). Chap. Vm. SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN AMPHIPODA. 79 anterior feet (gnathopoda, Sp. Bate) and in the Hype- rinsB in the structure of the antennae, is often so great that males and females have been described as distinct species, and even repeatedly placed in different genera (Orehestia and Talitrus, Cerajous and Bercothoe, Lestri- gonus and Eyperia) or even families {Htjperines anor- males and Hyperines orclinaires). Nevertheless it is only developed when the animals are nearly full-grown. Up to this period the young resemble the females in a general way, even in some cases in which these differ more widely than the males from the " Type " of the order. Thus in the male Shore-hoppers (OrcJiestia) the second pair of the anterior feet is provided with a powerful hand, as in the majority of the Amphipoda, but very differently constructed in the females. The young, nevertheless, resemble the female. Thus also, — and this is an extremely rare case," — the females of BracJiyscelus are destitute of the posterior (or inferior) antennte; the male possesses them like other Amphi- podee; in the young I, like Spence Bate, can find no trace of them. It is, however, to be particularly remarked, that the development of the sexual peculiarities does not stand still on the attainment of sexual maturity. For example, the younger sexually mature males of Orchestia Tucurauna, n. sp., have slender inferior an- tennae, with the joints of the flagellum not fused toge- ther, the clasping margin (" palm," Sp. Bate) of the " I know of no case in which the inferior (antenna}) are ohsolcto, when the superior are developed," Dana. (Darwin, ' Monograph on the Subclass Cirripedia, Lepadidro,' p. 15.) 80 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. VIII. band in tlie second pair of feet is uniformly con- vex, the last pair of feet is slender and similar to the preceding. Subsequently the antennae become thickened, two, three, or four of the first joints of the flagellum are fused together, the palm of the hand acquires a "deep eraargiuation near its inferior angle, and the intermediate joints of the last pair of feet become swelled into a considerable incrassation. No museum-zoologist would hesitate about fabricating two distinct species, if the oldest and youngest sexually mature males were sent to him without the uniting in- termediate forms. In the younger males of Orchestia TucuTotinga, although the microscopic examination of Fig. 50." Fig. 51. » their testes showed that they were already sexually mature, the emargination of the clasping margin of the hand (represented in fig. 50) and the corresponding pro- cess of the finger, are still entirely wanting. The same may be observed in Cerapus and Caprella, and probably in all cases where hereditary sexual difibrences occur. 1^ Fig. 50. Foot of the second pair (" second pair of gnathopoda of the male and fig. 51 of the female, of Orchestia Tucuratinga, magn. 15 diam. Chap. VIII. DIASTYLIDJ3. 81 Nest to the extensive sections of tlie Stalk-eyed and Sessile-eyed Crustacea, but more nearly allied to the former than to the latter, comes the remarkable family of the Biastylidss or Cumacea. The young, which Kroyer took out of the brood-pouch of the female, and ■which attained one - fourth of j-.g 52 ,6 the length of their mother, resembled the adult animals almost in all parts. Whether, as in Mijsis and Ligia, a transformation occurs within the brood -pouch, which is constructed in the same way as in Mysis, is not known." The caudal " Fig. 52. Male of a Bodotria, magn. 10 diam. Note the long inferior autenuse, which are closely applied to the body, and of which the apex is visible beneath the caudal appendages. 1' A trustworthy English Naturalist, Goodsu', described the brood- pouch and eggs of Cuma as early as 1843. Kroyer, whose painstaking care and conscientiousness is recognised with wonder by every one who has met him on a common field of work, confii-med Goodsir's state- ments in 1846, and, as above mentioned, took out of the brood-pouch embryos advanced in development and resembling their parents. By this the question whether the Diastylidse are full-grown animals or larv£E, is completely and for ever set at rest, and only the famous names of Agassiz, Dana and Milne-Edwards, who would recently reduce them again to larviie (see Van Beneden, ' Rech. sur la Faune littor. de Belgique,' Crustace'es, pp. 73, 74), induce me, on the basis of numerous investiga- tions of my own, to declare in Van Beneden's words ; " Parmi toutes les formes embryonnaires de podophthalmes ou d'e'driophthalmes que nous avons observe'es sur nos cotes, nous n'en avons pas vu une seule qui eut mcme la moindre rcssemblance nvec un Ctma quelconque." The only thing that suits the larvaj of Hijipolyte, Paliemon and Alpheus, in the family character of the Cumacea as given by Kroyer wliich occupies three pages (Kroyer, ' Naturh. Tidsslaift, Ny Etekke,' Bd. ii. pp. 203— 20G) is : " Duo antennarum paria." And this, as is well known G 82 HISTOET OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. Vni. portion of the embryo in the Diastylidse, as I have recently observed, is curved upwards as in the Isopoda, and the last pair of feet of the thorax is wanting. Equally scanty is our knowledge of the developmental history of the Ostracoda. We know scarcely anything except that their anterior limbs are developed before the posterior one (Zenker). The development of Cypris has recently been observed by Claus : — " The youngest stages are shell-bearing Nauplius-forms." applies to nearly all Crustacea. How well warranted are we therefore in identifying the latter with the former. However, it is suflScient for any one to glance at the larva of Palmmon (fig. 27) and the Cumacean (fig. 52) in order to be convinced of their extraordinary similarity ! Chap. IX. DEVELOPMENT OF BllANCHIOPODA. 83 CHAPTEE IX. DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY OF ENTOMOSTEACA, CIERI- PEDES, AND EHIZOCEPHALA. The section of the Brancliiopoda includes two groups differing even in their development —the Phyllopoda and the Cladocera. The latter minute animals, pro- vided with six pairs of foliaceous feet, which chiefly belong to the fresh waters, and are diffused under similar forms over the whole world, quit the egg with their full number of limbs. The Phyllopoda, on the contrary, in which the number of feet varies between 10 and 60 pairs, and some of which certainly live in the saturated lie of salterns and natron-lakes, but of which only one rather divergent genus (Nebalia) is found in the sea,^ have to undergo a metamorphosis. Mecznikow has recently observed the development of Nebalia, and concludes from his observations "that Nebalia, during its embryonal life, passes through the ' If the Phyllopoda may be regarded as the nearest allies of the Trilobites, they would furnish, with Lepidostms and Fohjpterus, Lepidosiren and Protopterus, a further example of the preservation in fresh waters of forms long since extinguished in the sea. The occurrence of the Artemix in supersaline water would at the same time show that they do not escape destruction by means of the fresh water, but in consecjuence of the less amount of competition in it. a 2 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA, Chap. IX. Nauplius- and Zoea-stages, which in the Decapoda occur partly (in Peneus) in the free state." "Therefore," says he, " I regard Nebalia as a Phyllopodiform Deca- pod." The youngest larvse [of the Phyllopoda] are NaupHi, which we have ah-eady met with exceptionally in some Prawns, and which we shall now find repro- duced almost without exception. The body-segments and feet, which are sometimes so numerous, are formed gradually from before backwards, without the indication of any sharply-discriminated regions of the body either by the time of their appearance or by their form. All the feet are essentially constructed in the same manner and resemble the maxillae of the higher Crustacea.^ We might regard the Phyllopoda as Zoeae which have not arrived at the formation of a peculiarly endowed abdomen or thorax, and instead of these have repeatedly reproduced the appendages which first follow the Nauplius-limbs. Of the Copepoda — some of which, living in a free state, people the fresh waters, and in far more multi- farious forms the sea, whilst others, as parasites, infest animals of the most various classes and often become wonderfully deformed — the developmental history, like their entire natural history, was, until lately, in a very unsatisfactory state. It is true, that we long ago knew that the Cyclopes of our fresh waters were excluded in the Nauplius-form, and that we were acquainted with some others of their young states; we had learnt, 2 "Tlie maxilla of the Decapod-larva (Ej-ebslarve) is a sort of Phyllopodnl foot" (Glaus). Chap. IX: DEVELOPMENT OF GOPEPODA. 85 througli Nordmann, that the same earliest form be- longed to several parasitic Crustacea, which had pre- viously passed, almost universally, as worms ; but the connecting intermediate forms which would have per- mitted ns to refer the regions of the body and the limbs of the larvse to those of the adult animal, were wanting. The comprehensive and careful investigations of Glaus have filled up this deficiency in our knowledge, and rendered the section of the Copepoda one of the best known in the whole class. The following statements are derived fi-om the works of this able naturalist. From the abundance of valuable materials which they contain I select only those which are indispensable for the comprehension of the development of the Crustacea in general, because, in what relates to the Copepoda in particular, the facts have abeady been placed in the proper light by the representation of their most recent investigator, and must appear to any one whose eyes are open, as important evidence in favour of the Dar- winian theory.^ All the larvse of the free Copepoda investigated by Claus, have, at the earliest period, three pairs of limbs (the future antennae and mandibles), the anterior with a single, and the two following ones with a double series of joints, or branchiae. The unpaired eye, labrum, and mouth, already occupy their permanent positions. The posterior portion, which is usually short and destitute of limbs, bears two terminal setae, between which the anus 3 I am still unacquainted with Glaus' latest and larger work, but no doubt the same may be said of it. 86 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IX. is situated. The form in this Naupli us -brood is ex- tremely various, — it is sometimes compressed laterally, sometimes flat, — sometimes elongated, sometimes oval, sometimes round or even broader than long, and so forth. The changes which the first larval stages under- go during the progress of growth, consist essentially in an extension of the body and the sprouting forth of new limbs. " The following stage already displays a fourth pair of ex- tremities, the future maxilla3." Then fol- io w at once three new pairs of limbs (the maxillipedes and the two anterior pairs of natatory feet). The larva still continues like a Nauplius, as the three anterior pairs of limbs repre- sent rowing feet ; at the next moult it is converted into the youngest Cyclops- like state, when it resembles the adult animal in the structure of the antennae and buccal organs, although the number of limbs and body-segments is still much less, for only the Figs. 53 and 54. Nauplii of Oopepoda, the former magn. 90, the latter 180 diam. Chap. IX. DEVELOPMENT OF COPEPODA, 87 rudiments of the third and fourth pairs of natatory feet have made their appearance in the form of cushions fringed with setae, and the body consists of the oval cephalothoras, the second, third, and fourth thoracic segments, and an elongated terminal joint. In the Cyclopida3 the posterior antennse have lost their secondary branch, and the mandibles have completely thrown off the previously existing natatory feet, whilst in the other families these appendages persist, more or less altered. " Beyond this stage of free development, many forms of the parasitic Copepoda, such as Lernan- throjpiis and Chondracanthus, do not pass, as they do not acquire the third and fourth pairs of limbs, nor does a separation of the fifth thoracic segment from the abdomen take place ; others (Achtheres) even fall to a lower grade by the subsequent loss of the two pairs of natatory feet. But all free Copepoda, and most of the parasitic Crustacea, pass through a longer or shorter series of stages of development, in which the limbs acquire a higher degree of division into joints in con- tinuous sequence, the posterior pairs of feet are de- veloped, and the last thoracic segment and the different abdominal segments are successively separated from the common terminal portion." There is only one thing more to be indicated in the developmental history of the parasitic Crustacea, namely that some of them, such as Achtheres percarum, certainly quit the egg like the rest in a Nauplius-like form, inas- much as tlie plump, oval, astomatous body bears two pairs of simple rowing feet, and behind these, as traces 88 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IX. of the tliii'd pair, two inflations furnished each with a long seta, but that beneath this Nauplius-skin a very different larva lies ready prepared, which in a few hours bursts its clumsy envelope and then makes its appearance in a form " which agrees in the seg- mentation of the body and in the de- velopment of the ex- tremities with the first Cijclo])s-stage " (Glaus). The en- tire series of Nau- plius-stages which are passed through by the free Copepo- da, are in this case completely over- leapt. A final and very peculiar section of the Crustacea is formed by the two orders of the Cirripedia and Ehizo- cephala.^ * Fig. 55. Nauplius of - Tetraclita porosa after the first moult, magn. 90 diam. The brain is seen surrounding the eye, and from it the olfactory filaments issue ; behind it are some delicate muscles passing to the buccal hood. 8 The most various opinions prevail as to the position of the Cirripedia. Some ascribe to them a very subordinate position among tlie Copepoda; as Milne-Edwards (1852). In direct opposition to this notion of his lather's, Alph. Milne-Edwards places them (as Basinotes) opposite to all the other Crustacea (Eleutheronotes). Darwin regards tbem as forming a peculiar sub-class equivalent to the Podophthalma, Edri- ophthalma, &c. This appears to me to be most convenient. I would not Chap. IX. CIREIPEDIA AND RHIZOCEPHALA. 89 In these also the brood bursts out in the Nauplius- form, and speedily strips off its earliest larva-shin which is distinguished by no peculiarities worth noticing. Here also we find again the same pyriform shape of the un- segmented body, the same number and structure of the feet, the same position of the median eye (which, how- ever, is wanting in Sacculina purpurea, and according to Darwin in some species of Lepas), and the same position of the "buccal hood," as in the Nau]Dlii of the Prawns and Copepoda. From the latter the Nauplii of the Cirripedia and Ehizocephala are distinguished by the possession of a dorsal shield or carapace, which sometimes [Sacculina purpurea) projects far beyond the body all round ; and they are distinguished not only from other Nauplii, but as far as I know from all other Crustacea, by the circumstance that structures which are elsewhere combined with the two anterior limbs (antenuEe), here occur separated from them. The anterior antennae of the Copepoda, Cladocera, Phyllopoda (Leydig, Claus), Ostracoda (at least the Cypridince), Diastylidee, Edriophthalma, and Podoph- thalma, with few exceptions relating to terrestrial ani- mals or parasites, bear peculiar filaments which I have already repeatedly mentioned as " olfactory filaments." combine the Ehizocephala -with the Cirripedia, as Liljeborg has done, but place them in opposition as equivalent, lilve the Amphipoda and Isopoda. The near relationship of the Cirripedia to the Ostracoda is also spoken of, but the similarity of the so-called " Cypris-like larvce," or Cirriped-pupsB as Darwin calls tliem, to Cypris is so purely external, oven as regards the shell, that the relationship appears to me to be scarcely greater than that of Peltogaster sodalis (fig. 59) with the family of the sausages. 90 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap, IX. A pair of similar filaments spring, in the larva3 of tlie Cirripeclia and Eliizocephala, directly from the brain. Fig. 56.' At the base of the inferior antennae in the Decapoda the so-called " green-gland " has its opening ; in the Macrura at the end of a conical process. A similar conical process with an efferent duct traversing it is very striking in most of the Ampliipoda. In the Ostracoda, Zenker describes a gland situated in the base of the inferior antennae, and opening at the extremity of an ex- traordinarily long " spine." In the Nauplii of Cyclops 7 Fig. 56. Nauplins of Sacculina purpurea, shortly before the second moult, magn. 180 diam. We may recognise in the first pair of feet the future adherent feet, and in the abdomen six pairs of natatory feet with long setaj. Chap. IX. CIEEIPEDIA AND RHIZOCEPHALA. 91 and Cyclojosine, Glaus finds pale " sliell-glands," which commence in the intermediate pair of limbs (the poste- rior antennae). On the other hand in the Nauplii of the Cnripedia and Rhizocephala the " shell-glands " open at the ends of conical processes, sometimes of most re- markable length, which spring from the angles of the broad frontal margin, and have been interjjreted some- times as antenna3 (Burmeister, Darwin) and sometimes as mere " horns of the carapace " (Krohn). The con- nexion of the "shell-glands" with the frontal horns has been recognised unmistakably in the larvse of Lepas, and indeed the resemblance of the frontal horns with the conical processes on the inferior antennae of the Amphipoda, is complete throughout.^ Notwithstanding their agreement in this important peculiarity, the Nauplii of these two orders present material differences in many other particulars. The abdomen of the young Cirripede is produced beneath the anus into a long tail-like appendage which is fur- cate at the extremity, and over the anus there is a second long, spine-like process; the abdomen in the Ehizocephala terminates in two short points, — in a "moveable caudal fork, as in the Eotatoria," (0. Schmidt). The young Cirripedes have a mouth, stomach, intestine, and anus, and their two posterior pairs of limbs are beset with multifarious teeth, setse, and hooks, which certainly assist in the inception of nourishment. All this is wanting in the young Khizo- « In connexion with this it may be mentioned thnt, in the females of Brachyscelus, m which the posterior antenna are deficient, the conical processes with the canal peimeating them are nevertheless retained. 92 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IX. cephala. The Nauplii of the Cirripedia have to undergo several moults whilst in that form ; the Nauplii of the Rhizocephala, being astomatous, cannot of course live l9ng as Nauplii, and in the course of only a few days they become transformed into equally astomatous "pupae," as Darwin calls them. The carapace folds itself together, so that the little animal acquires the aspect of a bivalve shell, the fore- most limbs become transformed into very peculiar adherent feet (" prehensile antennae," Darwin), and the two following pairs are cast off, like the frontal horns. On the abdomen six pairs of powerful biramose nata- tory feet with long setae have been formed beneath the Nauplius-skin, and behind these are two short, setige- rous caudal appen- dages (fig. 58). The pupje of the Cirripedia (fig. 57), which are likewise astomatous, agree completely in all these parts with those of the Rliizo- cephala, even to the minutest details of the segmenta- ^ Fig. 57. Pupa of a Balanide [Chniamalmi), magn. 50 diam. The adherent feet are retracted -within the rather opaque anterior part of the shell. Fig. 58. Pupa of Sacculina purpurea, magn. 180 diam. The fila- ments on the adherent feet may be the commencements of the future roots. Fig. 58. w Chap. IX. CIERIPEDIA AND RHIZOCEPHALA. 93 tion and bristling of the natatory feet;'^ tliey are especially distinguished from them by the possession of a pair of composite eyes. Sometimes also traces of the frontal horns seem to persist.^^ As the Cirripedia and Ehizocephala now in general resemble each other far more than in their Nauplius- state, this is also the case with the individual members of each of the two orders. The pupae in both orders attach themselves by means of the adherent feet ; those of the Cirripedes to rocks, shells, turtles, drift-wood, ships, &c., — those of the Ehizocephala to the abdomen of Crabs, Porcellance, and Hermit Crabs. The carapace of the Cirripedes be- comes converted, as is well-known, into a peculiar test, on account of which they were formerly placed among the Mollusca, and the natatory feet grow into long cirri, which whirl nourishment towards the mouth, which is now open. The Ehizocephala remain astomatous ; they lose all their limbs completely, and appear as sausage- like, sack-shaped or discoidal excrescences of their host, filled with ova (figs. 59, 60) ; from the point of Compare the figure given by Darwin (Balanidse, PI. xxx. fig. 5) of the first natatory foot of the pupa of ie^jas austrulis, with that of Lerna'.odiscus Porcellanx published in the 'Archivfiir Natui-geschichte ' (1863, Taf. iii. fig. 5). The sole distinction, that in tlie latter there are only 3 setae at the end of the outer branch, whilst in the Cirripedia there are 4 on the first and 5 on the following natatory feet, may be due to an error on my part. 12 Darwin describes as "acoustic orifices" small apertures in the shell of the pupse of the Cirripedia, which, frequently surrounded by a border, are situated, in Lepas pectinata, upon short, liorulike processes. I feel scarcely any hesitation in regarding the apertures as tliose of the " shell-glands," and the hornlike processes as remains of the frontal horns. 94 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IX. attacliment closed tubes, ramified like roots, sink into the interior of the host, twisting round its intestine, or becoming diffused among the sac-like tubes of its liver. The only manifestations of life which persist in these non jolus ultras in the series of retrogres- sively metamor- phosed Crustacea, are powerful con- tractions of the roots, and an alter- nate expansion and contraction of the body, in consequence of which water flows into the brood-cavity and is again expelled, through a wide orifice.'* Out of several CirrijDedes, which are anomalous both in structure and develoj)ment, CryptojjMalus minutus must be mentioned here ; Darwin found it in gi'eat quantities together in the shell of Concholepas peruviana on the ^'^ Fig. 59. Young of Peltogaster socialis on the abdomen of a small Hermit Crab ; in one of them the fasciculately ramified roots in the liver of the crab are shown. Animal and roots deep yellow. Fig. 60. Young Sacculina purpurea with its roots ; the animal purple-red, the roots dark grass-green. Magn. 5 diam. 15 The roots of Sacculina purpurea (fig. 60) which is parasitic upon a small Hermit Crab, are made use of by two parasitic Isopods, namely a Bopyrus and the before mentioned Cryptoniscus planarioides (fig. 42). These take up their abode beneath the Sacculina and cause it to die away by intercepting the nourishment conveyed by the roots; the roots, however, continue to grow, even without the Sacculina, and frequently attain an extraordinary extension, especially when a Bopyrus obtains its nourishment from them. Chap. IX. CIRRIPEDIA AND RPIIZOCEPHALA. 95 Clionos Islands. The egg, whicli is at first elliptical, soon, according to Darwin, becomes broader at the anterior extx-emity, and acquires three club-shaped horns, one at each anterior angle and one behind ; no internal parts can as yet be detected. Subsequently the posterior horn disappears, and the adherent feet may be recognised within the anterior ones. From this "egg-like larva " — (Darwin says of it, "I hardly know what to call it ") — the pupa is directly produced. Its carapace is but slightly compressed laterally and hairy, as in SciGculina purpurea ; the adherent feet are of con- siderable size, and the natatory feet are wanting, as, in the adult animal, are the corresponding cirri. As I learn from Mr. Spence Bate, the Nauplius-stage appears to be overleaped and the larvse to leave the egg in the pupa-form, in the case of a Khizocephalon (Peltogaster ?) found by Dr. Powell in the Mauritius. I will conclude this general view with a few words upon the earliest pro- cesses in the develop- ment of the Crustacea. Until recently it was re- garded as a general rule that, by the partial seg- mentation of the vitel- lus a germinal disc was formed, and in this, cor- '64 Figs. 61, 62, 63, 64. " i« Figs. 01—6.3. Eggs of Tetraclila porosa in segmentation, magn. 90 diam. The larger of the two first-formed spheres of segmentation is always turned towards the pointed end of the egg. Fig. Gi. Egg of Lernxodiscus Forcellanx, in segmentation, magn. 90 diam. 96 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. IX. responding to the ventral surface of the embryo, a primi- tive band. We now know that in the Copepoda (Claus), in the Ehizocepbala (fig. 64), and, as I can add, in the Cirripedia (figs. 61-63) the segmentation is complete, and the embryos are sketched out in their complete form without any preceding primitive band. Probably the latter will always be the case where the young are hatched as true Nauplii (and not merely with a Nau- plius-skin, as in Achtheres). The two modes of deve- lopment may occur in very closely allied animals, as is proved by Achtheres among the Copepoda." I have not mentioned the Pycnogonidse, because I do not regard them as Crustacea ; nor the Xiphosui-a and Trilobites, because, having never investigated them myself, I knew too little about them, and especially because I am unacquainted with the details of the explana- tions given by Barrande of the development of the latter. According to Mr. Spence Bate " the young of Trilobites are of the Nauplius- form." Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 97 CHAPTEE X. ON THE PKINCIPLES OP CLASSIFICATION. Pekhaps some one else, more fortunate than myself, may be able, even without Darwin, to find the guiding clue through the confusion of deyelopmental forms, now so totally different in the nearest allies, now so sur- prisingly similar in members of the most distant groups, which we have just cursorily reviewed. Perhaps a sharper eye may be able, with Agassiz, to make out " the plan established from the beginning by the Creator," ' who may have written here, as a Portuguese ]>roverb says " straight in crooked lines." ^ I caunot but think that we can scarcely speak of a general plan, or typical mode of development of the Crustacea, differentiated according to the separate Sections, Orders, and Fami- lies, when, for example, among the Macrura, the Eiver Crayfish leaves the egg in its permanent form ; the ' " A plan fully matured in the beginning and undeviatingly pursued ;" or " In the beginning His plan was formed and from it He has never swerved in any particular" (Agassiz and Gould, ' Principles of Zoology' ). « " Decs escrive direito em linhas tortas." To read this remarkable ■writing we need the spectacles of Faith, which seldom suit eyes accustomed to the Microscope. H 98 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. X. Lobster with Schizopodal feet ; Palwmon, like the Crabs, as a Zoea ; and Peneus, like the Cirripedes, as a Nau- pHus, — and when, still, within this same sub-order Ma- crura, Palinurus, My sis and Euphausia again present different young forms, — when new limbs sometimes sprout forth as free rudiments on the ventral surface, and are sometimes formed beneath the skin which passes smoothly over them, and both modes of deve- lopment are found in different limbs of the same animal and in the same pair of limbs in different animals, — when in the Podophthalma the limbs of the thorax and abdomen make their appearance sometimes simidtane- ously, or sometimes the former and sometimes the latter first, and when further in each of the two groups the pairs sometimes all appear together, and some- times one after the other, — when, among the Hyperina, a simple foot becomes a chela in Phronima and a chela a simple foot in Brachyscelus, &c. And yet, according to the teaching of the school, it is precisely in youth, precisely in the course of develop- ment, that the " Type " is mostly openly displayed. But let us hear what the Old School has to tell us as to the significance of developmental history, and its rela- tion to comparative anatomy and systematic zoology. Let two of its most approved masters speak. '•' Whilst comparative anatomy," said Johannes Miiller, in 1844, in his lectures upon this science (and the opinions of my memorable teacher were for many years my own), " whilst comparative anatomy shows u? the infinitely multifarious formation of tiie same organ Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 99 in the Animal Kingdom, it furnishes us at the same time with the naeans, by the comparison of these various forms, of recognising the truly essential, the type of these organs, and separating therefrom everything un- essential. In this, developmental history serves it as a check or test. Thus, as the idea of development is not that of mere increase of size, but that of progress from what is not yet distinguished, but which potentially contains the distinction in itself, to the actually dis- tinct,— it is clear, that the less an organ is developed, so much the more does it approach the type, and that, during its development, it more and more acquires peculiarities. The types discovered by comparative anatomy and developmental history must therefore agree." Then, after Johannes Miiller has combated the idea of a graduated scale of animals, and of the passage through several animal grades during development, he continues : — " What is true in this idea is, that every embryo at first bears only the type of its section, from which the type of the Class, Order, &c., is only after- wards developed." In 1856, in an elementary work,^ in which it is usual to admit only what are regarded as the assured acquisi- tions of science, Agassiz expresses himself as follows : — " The ovarian eggs of all animals are ferfecilij identi- cal, small cells with a vitellus, germinal vesicle and germinal spot" (§ 278). ''The organs of the body are 3 ' Principles of Zoology.' Part I. Comparative Physiology. By Louis Agassiz and A. A. Gould, Revised Edition. Boston, 1856. H 2 100 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. X. formed in the sequence of their organic importance ; the most essential always apjpear first. Thus the organs of vegetative life, the intestine, &c., appear later than those of animal life, the nervous system, skeleton, &c., and these in turn are preceded by the more general phenomena belonging to the animal as such" (§ 318). " Thus, in Fishes, the first changes consist in the seg- mentation of the vitellus and the formation of a germ, processes which are common to all classes of animals. Then the dorsal furrow, characteristic of the Vertebrate, appears — the brain, the organs of the senses ; at a later period are formed the intestine, the limbs, and the per- manent form of the respiratory organs, from which the class is recognised with certainty. It is only after ex- clusion that the peculiarities of the structure of the teeth and fins indicate the genus and species " (§ 319). "Hence the embryos of different animals resemble each other the more, the younger they are" (§ 320). " Conse- quently the high imj)ortance of developmental history is indubitable. For, if the formation of the organs tahes ^lace in the order corresponding to their importance, this sequence must of itself be a criterion of their compara- tive value in classification. The peculiarities which appear earlier should be considered of higher value than those which appear subsequently" (§ 321). "A system, in order to le true and natural, must agree with the sequence of the organs in the development of the embryo" (§ 322). I do not know whether any one at the present day will be inclined to subscribe to this proposition in its Chap, X. CLASSIFICATION. 101 whole extent.'' It is certain, however, that views essen- tially similar are still to be met with everywhere in discussions on classiiication, and that even within the last few years, the very sparingly successful attempts to employ developmental history as the foundation of classification have been repeated. But how do these propositions agree with our obser- vations on the developmental history of the Crustacea ? That these observations relate for the most part to theii* "free metamorphosis" after their quitting the egg, cannot prejudice their application to the proposi- tions enimciated especially with regard to " embryonal development " in the egg ; for Agassiz himself points out (§ 391) that both kinds of change are of the same nature and of equal importance and that no " radical distinction " is produced by the circumstance that the former take place before and the latter after birth. " The ovarian eggs of all animals are identical, small cells with vitellus, germinal vesicle and germinal spot." Yes, somewhat as all Insects are identical, small animals with head, thorax, and abdomen ; that is to say if, only noticing what is common to them, we leave out of consideration the difference of their de- velopment, the presence or absence and the multifa- * Agassiz' own views have lately become essentially different, so far as can be made out from End. Wagner's notice of his ' Essay on Classi- fication.' Agassiz himself does not attempt any criticism of the above cited older views, which, however, are still widely diifused. With his recent conception I am unfortunately acquainted only from E. Wagner's somewhat confused report, and have therefore thought it better not to attempt any critical remarks upon it. 102 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. X. rious structure of the vitelline membrane, tlie varying composition of the vitellus, the different number and formation of the germinal spots, &c. Kumerous exam- ples, which might easily be augmented, of such pro- found differences, are furnished by Leydig's ' Lehrbuch der Histologic.' In the Crustacea the ovarian eggs actually sometimes furnish excellent characters for the discrimination of species of the same genus ; thus, for example, in one Porcellana of this country they are blackish-green, in a second deep blood-red, and in a third dark yellow ; and within the limits of the same order they present considerable differences in size, which, as Van Benedeu and Claus have already pointed out, stands in intimate connexion with the subsequent mode of development. " The organs of the body are formed in the sequence of their organic importance ; the most essential always appear first." This proposition might be characterised a priori as undemonstrable, since it is impossible either in general, or for any particular animal, to establish a sequence of importance amongst equally iudisijensable parts. Which is the more important, the lung or the heart ? — the liver or the kidney ? — the artery or the vein ? Instead of giving the preference, with Agassiz, to the organs of animal life, we might with equal justice give it to those of vegetative life, as the latter are conceivable without the former, but not the former without the latter. We might urge that, according to this proposition, provisional organs as the first pro- duced must exceed the later-formed permanent organs in importance. Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 103 But let us stick to the Crustacea. In Pohjphemus Leydig finds the first traces of the intestinal tube even dui'ing segmentatiori. In Mysis a provisional tail is first formed, and in Ligia a maggot-lilie larva-skin. The simple median eye appears earlier, and Avould. therefore be more important than the compound paired eyes ; the scale of the antennae in the Prawns would be more important than the flagellum; the maxilli- pedes of the Decapoda would be more important than the chelfe and ambulatory feet, and the anterior six pairs of feet iu the Isopoda, than the precisely similaidy formed seventh pair ; in the Amphipoda the most im- portant of all organs would be the "micropylar ap- paratus," which disappears without leaving a trace soon after hatching ; in Cyclops the setse of the tail would be more important thau all the natatory feet ; in the Cirripedia the posterior antennae, as to which we do not know what becomes of them, would be more important than the cirri, and so forth. The most unimportant of all organs would be the sexual organs, and tiae most essential peculiarity would consist in colour, which is to be referred back to the ovarian egg. " The embryos, or young states of different animals, resemlle each other the more, the xjounger they are" or, as Johannes Miiller expresses it, they approach the more closely to the common type." Different as may be the ideas connected with the word « type," no one will dis- pute that the typical form of the penultimate pair of feet in the Amphipoda is that of a simple ambulatory foot, and not that of a chela, for the latter occurs in no 104 HISTORY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. X. single adult AmpUipod ; we know it only in the young of the genus Brachyseelus, which therefore in this respect undoubtedly depart more widely than the adults from the type of their order. This applies also to the young males of the Shore-hoppers (Orchestia) with regard to the second pair of anterior feet {gnatho- jooda). In like manner no one will hesitate to accept the possession of seven pairs of feet as a "typical" peculiarity of the Edriophthalma, which Agassiz, on this account, names Tetradecapoda ; the young Isopoda, which are Dodecapoda, are also in this respect further from the " type " than the adults. It is certainly a rule, and this Darwin's theory would lead us to expect, that in the progress of development those forms which are at first similar gradually depart further from each other ; but here, as in other classes, the exceptions, for which the Old School has no ex- planation, are numerous. Not unfrequently we might indeed directly reverse the proposition and assert that the diiference becomes the greater, the further we go back in the development, and this not only in those cases in which one of two nearly allied species is di- rectly developed, and the other passes through several larval stages, such as the common Crayfish and the Prawns which are produced from Nauplius-brood. The same may be said, for example, of the Isopoda and Amphipoda. In the adult animals the number of limbs is the same ; at the first sight of a Cyrtojahium or a DuUchia, and even after the careful examination of a Tanais, we may be in doubt whether we have an Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 105 Isopod or an Ampliipod before us ; in the newly-liatclied young the number of limbs is different, and if we go back to their existence in the egg, the most passing glance to see whether the curvature is upwards or downwards suflSces to distinguish even the youngest embryos of the two orders. In other instances, the courses which lead from a similar starting-point to a similar goal, separate widely in the middle of the development, as in the Prawns with Nauplius-brood already described. Finally, so that even the last possibility may be exhausted, it sometimes happens that the greatest similarity occurs in the middle of the development. The most striking example of this is furnished by the Cirripedia and Khizocephala, whether we compare the two orders or the members of each with one another ; from a segmentation quite different in its course (see figs. 61-64) proceed different forms of Nauplius, these become converted into exceedingly similar pupae, and from the pupae again proceed sexually mature animals, differing from each other ioto coelo. " If the formation of the organs occurs in the order corresponding to their importance, this sequence must of itself be a criterion of their comparative value in classifi- cation," THAT IS TO SAY, SUPPOSING THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLASSIFICATIONAL VALUE OF AN ORGAN TO CO- INCIDE! Just as in Christian countries there is a catechismal morality, which every one has upon his lips, but no one considers himself bound to follow, or expects to see followed by anybody else, so also has 106 HISTOHY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap, X. Zoology its dogmas, wliicli are as universally acknow- ledged, as they are disregai-ded in practice. Such a dogma as this is the supposition tacitly made by Agassiz. Of a hundred who feel themselves compelled to give their systematic confession of faith as the introduction to a Manual or Monographic Memoir, ninety-nine will commence by saying tiiat a natural system cannot be founded upon a single character, but that it has to take into account all characters, and the general structure of the animal, but that we must not simply sum up these characters like equivalent magnitudes, that we must not count but weigh them, and determine the importance to be ascribed to each of them according to its physio- logical significance. This is probably followed by a little jingle of words in general terms on the com- parative importance of animal and vegetative organs, circulation, respiration, and the like. But when we come to the work itself, to the discrimination and ar- rangement of the species, genera, families, &c., in all probability not one of the ninety-nine will j)ay the least attention to these fine rules, or undertake the hopeless attempt to carry them out in detail. Agassiz, for example, like Cuvier, and in opposition to the majority of the German and English zoologists, regards the Eadiata as one of the great primary divisions of the Animal Kingdom, although no one knows anything about the significance of the radiate arrangement in the life of these animals, and notwithstanding that the radiate Echinodermata are produced from bilateral larvae. The " true Fishes " are divided by him into Ctenoids Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 107 and Cycloids, according as the posterior margin of their scales is denticulated or smooth, a circumstance the importance of Avhich to the animal must be infinitely small, in comparison to the peculiarities of the dentition, formation of the fins, number of vertebrae, &c. And, to return to our Class of the Crustacea, has any particular attention been paid in their classification to the distinctions prevailing in the " most essential organs " ? For instance, to the nervous system ? In the Coiycseidfe, Claus found all the ventral ganglia fused together into a single broad mass, and in the Calanidae a long ventral chain of ganglia, — the former, therefore, in this respect resembling the Spider Crabs and the latter the Lobster; but no one would dream on this account of supposing that there was a relationship be- tween the CorycaeidcB and the Crabs, or the Calanidae and the Lobsters. — Or to the organs of circulation ? We have among the Copepoda, the Cyclopidse and Corycseidse without a heart, side by side with the Calanida3 and Pontellidas with a heart. And in the same way among the Ostracoda, the Cypridince, which I find possess a heart, place themselves side by side with Oyp-is and Gijthere which have no such organ. — Or to the respiratory apparatus ? Milne-Edwards did this when he separated Mysis and Leucifer from the Decapoda, but he himself afterwards saw that this was an error. In one Cypridina I find branchi£E of con- siderable size, wliich are entirely wanting in another species, but this does not appear to me to be a reason for separating these species even generically. 108 HISTOEY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. X. On the other hand, what do we know of the physio- logical significance of the number of segments, and all the other matters which we are accustomed to regard as typical peculiarities of the different organs, and to which we usually ascribe the highest systematic value ? " Those peculiarities which first appear, should he more highly estimated than those which appear subsequently. A system, in order to he true and natural, must agree with the sequence of the organs in the development of the embryo." If the earlier manifested peculiarities are to be estimated more highly than those which afterwards make their appearance, then in those cases in which the structure of the adult animal requires one position in the system, and that of the larva another, the latter and not the former must decide the point. As the Lerncece and Cirripedes, on account of their Nauplius- brood, were separated from their previous connexions and referred to the Crustacea, we shall, for the same reason, have to separate Peneus from the Prawns and unite it with the Copepoda and Cirripedia. But the most zealous embryomaniac would probably shrink from this course. A " true and natural system " of the Crustacea to be in accordance with the sequence of the phenomena would have to take into account in the first place the various modes of segmentation, then the position of the embryo, next the number of limbs produced within the egg and so forth, and might be represented some- what as follows : — Chap. X. CLASSIFICATION. 109 CLASSIS CRTJSTAGEA. Sub-clas3 I. HoLOSCHisTA. — Segmentation complete. No primitive band. Nauplius-brood. Ord. 1. Ceratometopa. — Nauplius with frontal horns. (Cirripedia, Ehizocephala.) Ord. 2. Leiometopa.— Nauplius without frontal homs. (Cope- poda, without Aclitheus, &e., Phyllopoda, Peneus.) Sub-class n. Heuischista. — Segmentation not complete. A. Nototropa. — Embryo bent upwards. Ord. 3. Protura.—The tail is first formed. {Mysis.) Ord. 3. Saccomorpha. — A maggot-Hke larva-skin is first formed. (^Isopoda.) B. Gasterotropa. — Embryo bent ventrally. Ord. 5. Zoeogona. — Full number of limjjs not produced in the egg. Zoea-brood. (The majority of the Podophthalmata.) Ord. 6. Ametahola. — ^Full number of limbs produced in the egg. {Astaous, Gecaroinus, Amphipoda leas Hyperia?') This sample may sufSce. The farther we go into details in this direction, the more brilliantly, as may easily be imagined, does the naturalness of such an arrangement as this force itself upon us. All things considered, we may apply the judgment which Agassiz pronounced upon Darwin's theory, with far greater justice to the propositions just examined : — " No theory," says he, " however plausible it may be, can be admitted in science, unless it is supported by facts." 110 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XI. CHAPTER XI. ON THE PEOGKESS OF EVOLUTION. Feom this scarcely unavoidable but unsatisfactory side- glance upon the old school, which looks down with so great an air of superiority upon Darwin's " intellectual dream " and the " giddy enthusiasm " of its friends, I turn to the more congenial task of considei ing the de- velojDmental history of the Crustacea from the point ©f view of the Darwinian theory. Darwin himself, in the thirteenth chapter of his book, has already discussed the conclusions derived from his hypotheses in the domain of developmental history. For a more detailed application of them, however, it is necessary in the first place to trace these general con- clusions a little further than he has there done. The changes by which young animals depart from their parents, and the gradual accumulation of which causes the production of new species, genera, and families, may occur at an earlier or later period of life, — in the young state, or at the period of sexual ma- turity. For the latter is by no means always, as in the Insecta, a period of repose ; most other animals even then continue to grow and to undergo changes. I ClIAP. XI. EVOLUTION. Ill (See aboYe, the remarks on the males of the Amphi- poda.) Some variations, indeed, from tlieir very nature, can only occur when the young animal has attained the adult stage of development. Thus the Sea Caterpillars (Polynoe) at first possess only a few body-segments, which, during develojiment, gradually increase to a number which is different in different species, but con- stant in the same species ; now before a young animal could exceed the number of segments of its parents, it must of course have attained that number. We may assume a similar supplementary progress wherever the deviation of the descendants consists in an addition of new segments and limbs. Descendants therefore reach a new goal, either de-^ viating sooner or later ivhilst still on the way toivards the form of their parents, or hy passing along this course without deviation, lut then, instead of standing still, ad- vance still farther. The former mode will have had a predominant action where the posterity of common ancestors constitutes a group of forms standing upon the same level in es- sential features, as the wbole of the Amphipoda, Crabs, or Birds. On the other hand we are led to the as- sumption of the second mode of progress, when we seek to deduce from a common original form, animals some of which agree with young states of others. In the former case the developmental history of the descendants can only agree with that of their ancestors up to a certain point at which their courses separate,— as to their structure in the adult state it will teach us 112 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XI. nothing. In the second case the entire development of the progenitors is also passed through hy the descendants, and, therefore, so far as the production of a species depends upon this second mode of progress, the historical develop- ment of the species will be mirrored in its developmental history. In the short period of a few weeks or months, the changing forms of the embryo and larvae will pass before us, a more or less complete and more or less true picture of the transfor- mations through which the species, in the course of untold thousands of years, has struggled up to its present state. One of the simplest examples is furnished by the development of the Tubicolar Annelids; but from its very simplicity it appears well adapted to open the eyes of many who, perhaps, would rather 1 Figs. 65-67. Young Tubicolar worms, magnified vnth the simple lens about 6 diam. : 65." without oiDcrculum, Protula-stage ; 66. with a barbate opercular peduncle, Filograna-at&ge ; 67. with a naked opercular peduncle, Serpula-ai&ge. Figs. 65, C6, 6Y. 1 ' Fig. 65 is drawn from memory, as the liitte animals, which I at first took for young Protula;, only attracted my attention when 1 remarked the appearance of the operculum, which induced me to draw them. Chap. XI. EVOLUTION. 113 not see, and it may therefore find a place here. Three years ago I found on the walls of one of my glasses some small worm-tubes (fig. 65), the inhabitants of which bore three pairs of barbate branchial filaments, and had no operculum. According to this we should have been obliged to refer them to the genus Protula. A few days afterwards one of the branchial filaments had be- come thickened at the extremity into a clavate oper- culum (fig. 66), when the animals reminded me, by the barbate opercular peduncle, of the genus Filograna, only that the latter possesses two opercula. In three days more, during which a new pair of branchial fila- ments had sprouted forth, the opercular peduncle had lost its lateral filaments (fig. 67), and the worms had become Serpulce. Here the supposition at once pre- sents itself that the primitive tubicolar worm was a Protula, — that some of its descendants, which had already become developed into perfect Protulce, subse- quently improved themselves by the formation of an operculum which might protect their tubes from inimical intruders, — and that subsequent descendants of these latter finally lost the lateral filaments of the opercular peduncle, which they, like their ancestors, had developed. What say the schools to this case? Whence and for what purpose, if the Serpulce were produced or created as ready-formed species, these lateral filaments of the opercular peduncle ? To allow them to sprout forth merely for the sake of an invariable plan of structure, even when they must be immediately re- I 114 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XI. tracted again as superfluous, would certainly be an evidence rather of childish trifling or dictatorial pe- dantry, than of infinite wisdom. But no, I am mis- taken; from the beginning of all things the Creator knew, that one day the inquisitive children of men would grope about after analogies and homologies, and that Christian naturalists avouM busy themselves with thinking out his Creative ideas ; at any rate, in order to facilitate the discernment by the former that the opercular peduncle of the Serpulce is homologous with a branchial filament, He allowed it to make a detour in its development, and pass thi-ough the form of a bar- bate branchial filament. The historical record preserved in developmental his- tory is gradualhj effaced as the development strikes into a constantly straighter course from the egg to the perfect animal, and it is frequently sophisticated hy the struggle for existence which the free-living larvce have to undergo. Thus as the law of inheritance is by no means strict, as it gives room for individual variations with regard to the form of the parents, this is also the case with the succession in time of the developmental processes. Every father of a family who has taken notice of such matters, is well aware that even in children of the same parents, the teeth, for example, are not cut or changed, either at the same age, or in the same order. Now in general it will be useful to an animal to obtain as early as possible those advantages by which it sustains itself in the struggle for existence. A precocious ap- j)earance of peculiarities originally acquired at a later Chap. XT. EVOLUTION. 115 period will generally be advantageous, and their re- tarded appearance disadvantageous ; the former, when it appears accidentally, will be preserved by natural selection. It is the same with every change which gives to the larval stages, rendered multifarious by crossed and oblique characters, a more straightforward dii-ection, simplifies and abridges the process of deve- lopment, and forces it back to an earlier period of life, and finally into the life of the egg. As this conversion of a development passing through different young states into a more direct one, is not the consequence of a mysterious inherent impulse, but de- pendent upon advances accidentally presenting them- selves, it may take place in the most nearly allied animals in the most various ways, and require very different periods of time for its completion. There is one thing, however, that must not be overlooked here. The historical development of a species can hardly ever have taken place in a continuously uniform flow ; periods of rest will have alternated with periods of rapid progress. But forms, which in periods of rapid progress were severed from others after a short dura- tion, must have impressed themselves less deeply upon the developmental history of their descendants, than those which repeated themselves unchanged, through a long series of successive generations in periods of rest. These more fixed forms, less inclined to variation, will present a more tenacious resistance in the transition to direct development, and will maintain themselves in a more uniform manner and to the last, however I 2 116 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Ciur. XI. different may be the course of this process in other respects. In general, as already stated, it will be advanta- geous to the young to commence the struggle for exist- ence in the form of their parents and furnished with all their advantages — in general, but not without excep- tions. It is perfectly clear that a brood capable of locomotion is almost indispensable to attached animals, and that the larvse of sluggish MoUusca, or of worms burrowing in the ground, &c., by swarming briskly through the sea perform essential services by dispers- ing the species over wider spaces. In other cases a metamorphosis is rendered indispensable by the cir- cumstance, that a division of labour has been set up between the various periods of life ; for example, that the larva3 have exclusively taken upon themselves the business of nourishment. A further circumstance to be taken into consideration is the size of the eggs, — a simpler structure may be produced with less material than a more compound one, — the more imperfect the larva, the smaller may the egg be, and the larger is the number of these that the mother can furnish T^ ith the same expenditure of material. As a rule, I believe indeed, this advantage of a more numerous brood will not by any means outweigh that of a more perfect brood, but it will do so in those cases iu which the chief diflficulty of the young animals consists in finding a suitable place for their development, and in which, therefore, it is of importance to disperse the greatest possible number of germs, as in many parasites. Chap. XI. EVOLUTION. 117 As the conversion of the original development with, metamorphosis into direct development is here under discussion, this may be the proper place to say a word as to the already indicated absence of metamor- phosis in fresh-water and terrestrial animals the marine allies of which still undergo a transformation. This circumstance seems to be explicable in two ways. Either species without a metamorphosis migrated espe- cially into the fresh waters, or the metamorphosis was more rapidly got rid of in the emigrants than in their fellows remaining in the sea. Animals without a metamorphosis would naturally transfer themselves more easily to a new residence, as they had only themselves and not at the same time multifarious young forms to adapt to the new condi- tions. But in the case of animals with a metamor- phosis, the mortality among the larvae, always consider- able, must have become still greater under new than under accustomed conditions, every step towards the simplification of the process of development must there- fore have given them a still greater preponderance over their fellows, and the effacing of the metamorphosis must have gone on more rapidly. What has taken place in each individual case, whether the species has immigrated after it had lost the metamorphosis, or lost the metamorphosis after its immigration, will not always be easy to decide. When there are marine allies without, or with only a slight metamorphosis, like the Lobster as the cousin of the Cray-fish, we may take up the former supposition; when allies with a 118 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XI. metamorphosis still live upon the land or in fresh water, as in the case of Gecarcinus, we may adopt the latter. That besides this gradual extinction of the primitive liistory, a falsification of the record preserved in the developmental history takes place by means of the struggle for existence which the free-living young states have to undergo, requires no further exposition. For it is perfectly evident that the struggle for exist- ence and natural selection combined with this, must act in the same way, in change and development, upon Inrvte which have to provide for themselves, as upon adult animals. The changes of the lai-vae, independent of the progress of the adult animal, wiU become the more considerable, the longer the duration of the life of the larva in comparison to that of the adult animal, the greater the difference in their mode of life, and the more sharply marked the division of labour between the different stages of development. These processes have to a certain extent an action opposed to the gradual extinction of the primitive history ; they in- crease the differences between the individual stages of development, and it will be easily seen how even a straightforward course of development may be again converted by them into a development with metamor- phosis. By this means many, and it seems to me valid reasons may be brought up in favour of the opinion that the most ancient Insects approached more nearly to the existing Orthoptera, and perhaps to the wingless Blattidae, than to any other order, and that the " com- Chap. XI. EVOLUTION. 119 plete metamorphosis " of the Beetles, Lepidoptera, &e., is of later origin. There were, I believe, perfect Insects before larvte and piipa3 ; but, on the contrary, Nauplii and Zoese far earlier than perfect Prawns. In contradistinction to the inherited metamorphosis of the Prawns, we may call that of the Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, &c., an acquired metamorphosis.^ - I -will here briefly give my reasons for the opinion that the so- called " complete metamorphosis" of Insects, in v.hich these animals quit the egg as grubs or caterpillars, and afterwards become quiescent pupsB incapable of feeding, was not inherited from the primitive ancestor of all Insects, but acquired at a later period. The order Orthoptera, including the Pseudoneuroptera (Ephemera, Libellula, &c.) appears to approach nearest to the primitive form of Insects. In favour of this view we have : — 1 . The structure of their buccal organs, especially the formation of th e labium, " which retains, either perfectly or approximately, the original form of a second pair of maxill£B " (Gerstacker). 2. The segmentation of the abdomen ; " like the labium, the abdomen also very generally retains its original segmentation, which is shown in the development of eleven segments" (Gerstacker). The Orthoptera with eleven segments in the abdomen, agree perfectly in the number of their body-segments with the Prawn-larva represented in fig. 33, or indeed, with the higher Crustacea (Podophthalma and Ediiophthalma) in general, in which the historically youngest last thoracic segment (see p. 123), which is sometimes late-developed, or destitute of appendages, or even deficient, is btill wanting. 3. That, as in the Crustacea, the sexual orifice and anus are placed upon diiferent segments; "whilst the former is situated in the ninth segment, the latter occurs in the eleventh " (Gerstacker). 4. Their paljeontological occurrence ; "in a fossil state the Orthoptera make their appearance tlie earliest of all Insects, namely as early as the Carboniferous formation, in which they exceed all others in number " (Gerstacker). 5. The absence of uniformity of habit at the present day in an order 80 small when compared with the Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, &c. For this also is usually a phenomenon characteristic of very ancient groups of forms which have already overstepped the climax of their develop- ment, and is explicable by extinction in mass. A Beetle or a Butterfly is to be recognised as such at the fii'st glance, but only a thorough 120 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XI. Wliicli of the different modes of development at present occurring in a class of animals may claim to be investigation can demonstrate tlio mutual relationships of Termes, Blatta, Mantis, Forficula, Ephemera, Idhellula, &c. I may refer to a corresponding remarkable example from the vegetable world : amongst Ferns the genera Aneimia, ScMzxa and Lygodium, belonging to the gi'oup Schizxaceas which is very poor in species, differ much more from each other tlian any two forms of the group Pohjpodiacex which numbers its thousands of species. If, from all this, it seems right to regard the Orthoptera as the order of Insects aijproaching most nearly to the common primitive form, we must also expect that their mode of development will agree better with that of the primitive form, than, for example, that of the Lepidoptera, in the same way that some of the Prawns (Feneus) approaching most closely the primitive form of the Decapoda, have most truly preserved their original mode of development. Now, the majority of the Orthoptera c\mi the egg in a form which is distinguished from that of the adult Insect almost solely by the want of wings ; these larvse then soon acquire rudiments of wings, which appear more strongly developed after every moult. Even this perfectly gradual transition from the youngest larva to the sexually mature Insect, preserves in a far lugher degree tbe picture of an original mode of development, than does the Bo-called complete metamorphosis of the Ooleoptera, Lepidoptera, or Diptera, with its abruptly separated larva-, pupa- and imago-stiites. The most ancient Insects would probably have most resembled these wingless larvse of the existing Orthoptera. The circumstance that there are still numerous wingless species among the Orthoptera, and that some of these (BlattidLe) are so like certain Crustacea (Isopods) in liabit that both are indicated by the same name (" Baralta ") by the people in this country, can scarcely be regarded as of any im- portance. The contrary supposition that the oldest Insects possessed a " com- plete metamorpliosis," and that the " incomplete metamorphosis " of the Orthoptera and Hemiptera is only of later origin, is met by serious difliculties. If all the classes of Arthropoda (Crustacea, Insecta, Myriopoda and Arachnida) are indeed all branches of a common stem (and of this there can scarcely be a doubt), it is evident that the water- inhabiting and water- breathing Crustacea must he regarded as the original stem from whicli the other terrestrial classes, with their tracheal respiration, have branched off. But nowhere among the Crustacea is there a mode of development comparable to the "complete metamorphosis" of the Insecta, nowhere among tlio young or adult Chap. XL EVOLUTION. 121 that approaching most nearly to tlie original one, is easy to judge from the above statements. Tlie frimitive history of a species will he preserved in its developnental history the more perfectly, the longer the series of tjoimff states through which it passes hy uniform step)s ; and the more tridy, the less the mode of life of the young departs from that of the adults, and the less the peculiarities of the individual ^joung states can he con- ceived as transferred hack from later ones in previous periods of life, or as independently acquired. Let us apply this to the Crustacea. Tustacea are there forms wliich miglit resemble the maggots of the iptera or Hymenoptera, the larvsa of the Coleoptera, or the caterpillars f the Lepidoptera, still less any bearing even a distant resemblance to e quiescent pupsB of these animals. The pupse, indeed, cannot at all e regarded as members of an original developmental scries, the 'ndividual stages of which represent permanent ancestral states, for an animid like the mouthless and footless pupa of the Silkworm, enclosed by a thick cocoon, can never have formed the final, sexually matui-e state of an Arthropod. In the development of the Insecta we never see new segments added to those already present in the youngest larv£e, but we do see segments which were distinct in the larva afterwards become fused together or dis- appear. Considering the parallelism which prevails throughout organic nature between palseontological and embryonic development, it is there- fore improbable that the oldest Insects should have possessed fewer segments than some of their descendants. But the larvse of the Cole- optera, Lepidoptera, &c., never have more than nine abdominal segments, it is therefore not probable that they represent the original young form of the oldest Insects, and that the Orthoptera, with an abdomen of eleven segments, should liave been subsequently developed from them. Taking into consideration on the one hand these difiBcultics, and on the other the arguments which indicate the Orthoptera as the order most nearly approaching the primitive form, it is my opinion that the "inc(jmplete metamorphosis" of the Orthoptera is the primitive one, inheriled from the original parents of all Insects, and the "complete metamorphosis" of the Coleoptera, Diptera, &c., a subsequently acquired one. HISTORY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. XIL CHAPTEK XII. PROGEESH OF EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. According to aU the characters established in the last paragraph, the Prawn that we traced from the Nauplius through states analogous to Zoea and Mysis to the form of a Macrurous Crustacean appears at present to be the animal, which in the section of the higher Crustacea (Malacostraca) furnishes the truest and most complete indications of its primitive history. . That it is the most complete is at once evident. That it is the truest must be assumed, in the first place, because the mode of life of the various ages is less different than in the majority of the other Podophthalma ; for from the Nauplius to the young Prawn they were found swimming freely in the sea, whilst Crabs, Porcellance, the Tatuira, SquHIa, and many Macrura, when adult usually reside under stones, in the clefts of rocks, holes in the earth, subter- ranean galleries, sand, &c., not to mention other devia- tions in habits such as are presented by the Hermit Crabs, Pinnotheres, &c., — and secondly and especially because the peculiarities which distinguish the Zoea of this species particularly from other Zoeoe (the employ- ment of the anterior limbs for swimming, the furcate tail, the simple heart, the deficiency of the paired eyes Chap. XI I. EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. 123 and abdomen at first, &c.) are neither to be deduced from a retro-transfer of late-acquired advantages to this early period of life, nor to be regarded at all as ad- vantages over other Zoese which the larva might have acquired in the struggle for existence. A similar development must liave been once passed through by the primitive ancestor of all Malacostraca, probably differing from that of our Prawn, especially in the circumstance that it would go on more uniformly without the sudden change of form and mode of locomo- ion produced in the latter by the simultaneous sprout- ing forth and entering into action in the JS'auplius of four and in the Zoea of five pairs of limbs. It is to be supposed that, not only originally but even still, in the larvae of the first Malacostraca, the new body-segments and pairs of limbs are formed singly, — first of all the segments of the fore-body, then those of the abdomen, and finally those of the middle-body, — and, moreover, that in each region of the body the anterior segments were formed earlier than the posterior ones, and there- fore last of all the hindermost segment of the middle- body. Of this original mode more or less distinct traces still remain, even in species in which, in other respects, the course of development of their ancestors is already nearly effaced. Thus the abdominal feet of the Prawn- larva represented in fig. 33, are formed singly from before backwards, and after these the last feet of the middle-body ; thus, in Palinurus, the last two pairs of feet of the middle-body are formed later than the rest ; thus in the young larvaj of the Stomapoda the last 124 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII, three abdominal segments are destitute of limbs, wbicii are still wanting on the last of them in older larvae ; and thus, in the Isopoda, the historically newest pair of feet is produced later than all the rest. In the Coije- poda this formation, of new segments and limbs, gradu- ally advancing from before backwards, is more perfectly preserved than in any of the higher Crustacea.' The original development of the Malacostraca start- ing from the Nauplius, or the lowest free-living grade with which, we are acquainted in the class of Crustacea, is now-a-days nearly effaced in the majority of them. That this extinction has actually taken place in the way already deduced as a direct consequence from Darwin's theory, will be the more easily demonstrated, the more this process is still included in the course of life, and the less completely it is already worn out. We may hope to obtain the most striking examples in the still unknown developmental history of the various Schizo- poda, Peneidse, and, indeed, of the Macrura in generaL At j)resent the multifarious Zoea-forms appear to be 1 It is well known that, in many cases, even in adult animals the last segment of the middle-body, or some of its last segments, either want their limbs or are themselves deficient (Entoniscus Porcellanie S , Leucifer, &c.)- This might be due to the animals having separated from the common stem before these limbs were formed at all. But in those cases with which I am best acquainted, it seems to me more probable that the limbs have been subsequently lost again. That these particular limbs and segments are more easily lost than others is explained by the circumstance tliat, as the youngest, they have been less firmly fixed by long-continued inheritance. ("Mr. Dana believes, that in ordinary Crustaceans, the abortion of tlie segments with their appendages almost always takes place at the posterior end of the cephalothorax." — Darwin, Balanidae, p. 111.) Chap. XII. EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. 125 particularly instructive. Almost all the peculiarities by which they depart from the primitive form of the Zoea of Peneus (figs. 29, 30, 32), may in fact be con- ceived as transferred back from a later period into this early period of life. This is the case with the large compound eyes, — with the structure of the heart, — with the raptorial feet in Squilla, — and with the powerful, muscular, straightly-extended abdomen in Palcemon, Alpheus, Sippohjte, and the Hermit Crabs. (In the latter, indeed, the abdomen of the adult animal is a shapeless sac filled with the liver and generative organs, but it is still tolerably powerful in the Glaucothoe-steige, and was certainly still more powerful when this stage was still the permanent form of the animal.) It is also the case with the abdomen of the Zoese of the Crabs, the Porcellance, and the Tatuira, which is still powerful, although usually bent under the breast ; the two last swim tolerably by means of the abdomen, even when adult, as do the true Crabs in the young state known as Megalops. It is the case, lastly, with the conversion of the two anterior pairs of limbs into antennee. The second pair of antennae, which, in the various Zoeas always remains a step behind that of the adult animal, is particularly remarkable. In the Crabs the " scale " is entirely wanting ; their Zoeae have it indicated in the form of a moveable appendage, which is often exceed- ingly minute. In the Hermit Crabs a similar, usually moveable, spiniform process occurs as the remains of the scale ; their Zoeac have a well-developed but in- articulate scale. A precisely similar scale is possessed 126 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. by the adult Prawns, in the Zoeae of which it exists still in a jointed form, like the outer branch of the second pair of feet of the Nauplius or Peneus-Zoea. The long, spiniform processes on the carapace of the Zoeoe of the Crabs and Porcellanm are not to be ex- plained in this way, but their advantage to the larvae is evident. Thus, for example, if the body of the Zoea of Poreellana stellicola (fig. 24), without the processes of the carapace and without the abdomen, which how- ever is not rigidly extensible, is scarcely half a line in length, whilst with the processes it is four lines long, a mouth of eight times the width is necessary in order to swallow the little animal when thus armed.^ Conse- quently these processes of the carapace may be regarded as acquired by the Zoea itself in the struggle for existence. The formation of new limbs beneath the skin of the larvse is also to be referred to an earlier occurrence of processes which originally took place at a later period. The original course must have been that they sprouted forth in a free form upon the ventral surface of the larva in the next stage after the change of skin ; whilst now they are developed before the change of skin, and thus only come into action a stage earlier. In larv£e which, for other reasons, must be regarded as more nearly approaching the primitive form, the original " Persephone, a rare Crab, belonging to tbe family Leueosiidaj, is served in the same manner by its long chelate feet. If we seize the animal, it extends them most obstinately straight downwards, so that in all probability we should more easily break than bend them. Chap. XII. EVOLUTION m CRUSTACEA. 127 mode usually preyails in this particular also. Thus the caudal feet (the " lateral caudal lamellas ") are formed fi-eely on the ventral surface in Eufliausia and the Praws -with Nauplius-brood, and within the caudal lamellfe in the Prawns with Zoea-brood, iu Pagurus and Porcellana. A compression of several stages into one, and there- by an abridgement and simplification of the course of development, is expressed in the simultaneous appear- ance of several new pairs of limbs. How earlier young states may gradually be completely lost, is shown by Mysis and the Isopoda. In Mysis there is still a trace of the Nauplius-stage ; being trans- ferred back to a period when it had not to provide for itself, the Nauplius has become degraded into a mere skin ; in Liffia (figs. 36, 37) this larva-skin has lost the last traces of limbs, and in Philoscia (fig. 38) it is scarcely demonstrable. Like the spinous processes of the Zoeae, the chelae on the penultimate pair, of feet of the young Brachyscelus are to be regarded as acquired by the larva itself. The adult animals swim admirably and are not confined to their host ; as soon as the specimens of Chrysaora Bios- sevillei, Less., or BMzostoma cruciatum, Less., on which they are seated, become the sport of the waves in the neighbourhood of the shore, they escape from them, and are only to be obtained from lively Acalephs. The young are helpless creatures and bad swimmers; a special apparatus for adhesion must be of great service to them. HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. To review the developmental history of the different Malacostraca in detail would furnish no results at all correspondent to the time occupied by it, — if our knowledge was more complete it would be more profit- able. I therefore abandon it, but will not omit to mention that in it many diflSculties which cannot at present be satisfactorily solved would present them- selves. To these isolated difficulties I ascribe the less importance, however, because even a little while ago, before the discovery of the Prawn-Nauplius, this entire domain of the development of the Malacostraca was almost inaccessible to Darwin's theory. Nor will I dwell upon the contradictions which appear to result from the application of the Darwinian theory to this department. I leave it to our opponents to find them out. Most of them may easily be proved to be only apparent. There are two of these objections, however, which lie so much on the surface that they can hardly escape being brought forward, and these, I think, I must get rid of, " The peculiarities in which the Zoese of the Crabs, the Porcellance, the Tatuira, the Hermit Crabs, and the Prawns with Zoea-brood agree, and by which they are in common distinguished from the larvae of Peneus produced from Nauplii, forces us (it might be said) to the supposition that the common ancestor of these various Decapods quitted the egg in a similar Zoea- form. But then neither Peneus with its Nauplius- brood, nor even apparently the Palinuri could be re- ferred back to this ancestor. ■ The mode of development Chap. XII. EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. 129 of Peneus and Palinurus, as also several peculiar larvae of unknown origin, but which are in all probability to be attributed to Macrurous Crustacea, necessitate on the contrary the opposite supposition, namely, that the different groups of the Macrura have passed fi-om their original to their present mode of development inde- pendently of each other and also independently of the Crabs." To this we may answer that the occurrence of the Zoea-form in all the above-mentioned Decapoda, its existence in Peneus during the whole of that period of life which is richest in progress and in which the wide gap between the Nauplius and the Decapod is filled up, its recurrence even in the development of the Stoma- poda, the occurrence of a larval form closely approaching the youngest Zoea of Peneus in the Schizopod genus Euphausia, and the reminiscence of the structure of Zoea, which even the adult Tanais has preserved in its mode of respiration, — all indicate Zoea as one of those steps in development which persisted as a permanent form throughout a long period of repose, perhaps through a whole series of geological formations, and thus has also made a deeper impression upon the development of its descendants, and formed a firmer nucleus in the midst of other and more readily effaced young states. It cannot, therefore, surprise us that in transitions from the original mode of metamorphosis to direct develop- ment, even when produced independently, the larval life commences in the same way with this Zoea-form in different families, in which the earlier stages of de- velopment are effaced. But except what is common to K 130 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. CflAp. xn. all Zoefe, and what may easily be explained as being trans- ferred back from a later into this stage, the Zoese of the Crabs, for example, agree with those of Pagurus and Palcemon in no single peculiarity of structure which leads us to suppose a common inheritance. Conse- quently we may apparently assume, without hesitation, that when the Brachyura and Macrura separated, the primitive ancestors of each of these groups passed through a more complete metamorphosis, and that the transition to the present mode of development belongs to a later period. With regard to the Brachyura, it may be added that in them this transition occurred only a little later and indeed before the existing families separated. The arrangement of the processes of the carapace, and, still more, the similar number of the caudal setae in the most different Zoese of Crabs (figs. 19-23) prove this. Such an accordance in the number of organs aj)parently so unimportant is only explicable by common inheritance. We may predict with cer- tainty that amongst the Brachyura no species will occur which, like Peneus, still produces Nauplius- brood.' As we have already seen, Mysis and the Isopoda depart from all other Crustacea very remarkably by the fact that their embryos are curved upwards, instead 3 I must not omit remarking that what has been said as to the development of the Crabs applies essentially only to the groups Cyclometopa, Catometopa and Oxyrhyncha, placed together by Alph. Milne-Edwards as " Eustome's." Among the Oxystomaia, as also among the " Anomura apterura," Edw., which approach so nearly to the Crabs, I am unacquainted with the earliest young states of any of the species. Chap, XII. EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. 131 of, as elsewhere, downwards. Does not so isolated a phenomenon as this, it might be asked, in the sense of Darwin's theory, indicate a common inheritance ? Does it not necessitate that we should unite as the descend- ants of the same primitive ancestors, Mysis with the Isopoda on the one hand, and on the other the rest of the Podophthalma with the Amphipoda ? I think not. Such a necessity exists only for those who estimate a peculiarity at a higher value because it makes its ap- pearance at an earlier period of the egg-life. Whoever regards species as not created independently and un- changeably, but as having gradually become what they are, will say to himself that, when the ancestors of our Mysides came (probably much later than those of the Amphipoda and Isopoda) to develope numerous body- segments and limbs whilst stiU embryos, as they could no longer find room in the egg when extended straight out, and were therefore compelled to bend themselves, this could only take place either upwards or down- wards, and whatever conditions may have decided the direction actually adopted, any near relationship to either of the two* orders of Edriophthalma could hardly have taken part in it. It may, however, be remarked, that the different cur- vature of the embryo in the Amphipoda and Isopoda is so far instructive, as it proves that their present mode of de- velopment was adopted only after the separation of these orders, and that, in the primitive stock of the Edrioph- thalma, the embryos were, if not Nauplii, at least short enough in the body to find room in the egg in an K 2 132 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. extended position, like the larvse of AehtJieres enclosed by the Nauplius-skin. On the other hand the uni- formity of development that prevails in each of the two orders — which is expressed in the Amphipoda for exam- ple in the formation of the " micropylar apparatus," in the Isopoda in the want of the last pair of ambulatory feet — testifies that the present mode of development has come down from a very early period and extends back beyond the separation of the present families. In these two orders also, as well as in the Crabs, we can hardly hope to find traces of earlier young states, xmless it be in the family of the Tanaidse.* If any one will furnish me with an Amphipod or an Isopod with Kau- plius-brood, the existence of which would not be more remarkable in independently produced species than that of a Prawn with Nauplius-brood, I will abandon the whole Darwinian theory. With regard to the Crabs, and also to the Isopoda and Amphipoda, we were led to the assumption, that, about the period when these groups started from the Whether the want of the abdomiual feet in the young of Tanais be an inheritance from the time of the primitive Isopoda, or a subsequently acquired peculiarity, which appears to me the more admissible view at present, may perhaps be decided with some certainty, when we become acquainted with the development and mode of life of its family allies, Apseudes and Ehaea. The latter, as is well known, is the only Isopod which possesses a secondary flagellum on the anterior antennaj. I have recently obtained a new and unexpected proof that the Tanaidx (" Asellotes he'teropodes " M.-Edw.) of all Iniown Crustacea approach most closely to the primitive form of the Edriophthalma. Mr. C. Spence Bate writes to me : " Apseudes, as far as I know, is the only Isopod in which the antennal scale so common in the Macrura is present on the lower antennse." Chap. XII. EVOLUTION IN CRUSTACEA. 133 common stem, a simplification of their process of deve- lopment took place. This also seems to be intelligible from Darwin's theory. When any circumstances favour- able to a group of animals caused its wider diffusion and divergence into forms adapting themselves to new and various conditions of existence, this greater varia- bility, which betrays itself in the production of new- forms, will also favour the simplification of the deve- lopment which is almost always advantageous, and moreover, exactly at this period, during adaptation to new circumstances, as has already been indicated with regard to fresh-water animals, this simplification will be doubly beneficial, and therefore, in connexion with this, a doubly strict selection will take place. So much for the development of the higher Crustacea. A closer examination of the developmental history of the lower Crustacea is unnecessary after what has been said in general upon the historical significance of the young states, and the application of this which has just been made to the Malacostraca. We may see, without further discussion, how the representation given by Clans of the development of the Copepoda may pass almost word for word as the primitive history of those animals ; we may find in the Nauplius-skin of the larva of Achtheres and in the egg-like larva of Crtjpto^Malus, precisely similar traces of a transition towards direct development, as were presented by the NaupUus-enve- lope of the embryos of Mysis and the maggot-like larva of Ligia, &c. It will be sufficient to indicate an essential difference 134 HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. in tlie process of development in tlie higlier and lower Crustacea. In the latter all new body-segments and limbs which, insert themselves between the two termi- nal regions of the Nauplius, are formed in uninterrupted sequence from before backwards ; in the former there is further a new formation in the middle of the body (the middle-body), which pushes itself in between the fore- body and the abdomen in the same way, as these have done on their part between the head and tail of the Nauplius. Thus, that which appears probable even from the comparison of the limbs of the adult animal, finds fresh support in the developmental history, namely, that the lower Crustacea, like the Insects, are entirely destitute of the region of the body corresponding to the middle-body of the Malacostraca. It seems pro- bable that the swimming feet of the Copepoda, as also of the pupse of Cirripedia and Khizocephala, represent the abdominal feet of the Malacostraca, that is to say, are derived by inheritance from the same source with them. It would be easy to weave together the separate threads furnished by the young forms of the various Crustacea, into a general picture of the primitive his- tory of this class. Such a picture, drawn with a little skill, and finished in lively colours, would certairdy be more attractive than the dry discussions which I have tacked on to the developmental history of these animals. But the mode of weaving in the loose threads would still in many cases be arbitrary, and to be effected with equal justice in various ways ; and many Chap. XH. EVOLUTION OF THE RHIZOCEPHALA. 1^5 gaps would still have to be filled up by means of more or less bold assumptions. Those who have not wan- dered much in this region of research would then readily believe that they were standing upon firm ground, where mere fancy had thrown an aiiy bridge ; those acquainted with the subject, on the other hand, would soon find out these weak points in the structure, but would then be easily led to regard even what was founded upon well considered facts, as merely floating in the air. To obviate these misconceptions of its true contents from either side, it would be necessary to ac- company such a picture throughout with lengthy, dry explanations. This has deterred me from further filling in the outline which I had already sketched. I will only give, as an example, the probable history of the production of a single group of Crustacea, and indeed of the most abnormal of all, the Ehizocephala, which in the sexually mature state differ so enormously even from their nearest allies, the Cirripedia, and from their peculiar mode of nourishment stand quite alone in the entire animal kingdom. I must preface this with a few words upon the homo- logy of the roots of the Ehizocephala, i.e. the tubules which penetrate from its point of adhesion into the body of the host, ramify amongst the viscera of the latter, and terminate in csecal branchlets. In the pupee of the Ehizocephala (fig. 58) the foremost limbs (" prehensile antenuEe ") bear, on each of the two terminal joints, a tongue-like, thin-skinned appendage, in which we may generally observe a few small strongly refractive gra- HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. nules, like those seen in the roots of the adult animal. I have therefore supposed these appendages to be the rudiments of the future roots. A perfectly similar appendage, " a most delicate tube or ribbon," was found by Darwin in free-swimming pupae of Lepas australis on the last joints of the " prehensile antennae." From the perfect accordance in their entire structure shown by the pupa3 of the Rhizocephala and Cirripedia, there can be no doubt that the appendages of SaccuUna and Lepas, which are so like each other and spring from the same spot, are homologous structures. Now in three species of Lepas, in Diehelaspis War- wicTcii and in Scalpellum Peronii, Darwin saw, on tear- ing recently-affixed animals from their point or support, that a long narrow band issued from the same point of the antennae ; its end was torn away, and in Diehelaspis, judging from its ragged appearance, it had attached itself firmly to the support. From this it follows that this appendage in Lepas australis can hardly be any- thing but a young cement-duct. If, therefore, the supposition that the appendages on the antennae of the pupae of Ehizocephala are young roots be cor- rect, the roots of the Ehizocephala are homologous with the cement-ducts of the Cirripedia. And this, strange as it may appear at the first glance, seems to me scarcely doubtful. It is true that the act of adhesion of the Rhizocephala has never yet been observed, but it is more than probable that they attach themselves, just like the Cirripedia, by means of the antennae, and that therefore the points of attachment in the two groups Chap. XII. EVOLUTION OF THE EHIZOCEPHALA. 137 indicate homologous parts of the body. From the point of attachment in the Ehizocephala the roots pene- trate into the body of the host, whilst in the Cirripedia, the cement-ducts issue from the same point. The roots are blind tubes, ramified in different ways in different species. The cement-ducts in the basis of the Balanidse likewise constitute a generally remarkably complicated system of ramified tubes, with regard to the mode of termination of which nothing certain has yet been made out. Individual caecal branches are not unfre- quently seen even in the vicinity of the carina; and, at least in some species, in which the cement-ducts divide into extremely numerous and fine branchlets, forming a network which gradually becomes denser towards the circumference of the basis, these seem nowhere to possess an orifice. Now as to the question: How were Cirripedia con- verted by natural selection into Ehizocephala ? A considerable number of existing Cirripedia settle exclusively or chiefly upon living animals ; — on Sponges, Corals, Mollusks, Cetaceans, Turtles, Sea-Snakes, Sharks, Crustaceans, Sea Urchins, and even on Acalephs. Di- chelaspis Barwinii was found by Filippi in the bran- chial cavity of Palinurus vulgaris, and I have met with another species of the same genus in the branchial cavity of Lwpea diacantha. The same thing may have taken place in primitive times. The supposition that certain Cirripedes might once upon a time have selected the soft ventral surface of a Crab, Porcdhna or Pagurm, for its dwelling-place, 138 HISTORY OP CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. has certainly nothing improbable about it. If then the cement-ducts of such a Cirripede instead of merely spreading on the surface, pierced or pushed before them the soft ventral skin and penetrated into the inte- rior of the host, this must have been beneiicial to the animal, because it would be thereby more securely attached and protected from being thrown off during the moulting of its host. Variations in this direction were preserved as advantageous. But as soon as the cement-ducts penetrated into the body-cavity of the host and were bathed by its fluids, an endosmotic interchange must necessarily have been set up between the materials dissolved in these fluids and in the contents of the cement-ducts, and this inter- change could not be without influence upon the nourish- ment of the parasite. The new source of nourishment opened up in this manner was, as constantly flowing, more certain than that offered by the nourishment accidentally whirled into the mouth of the sedentary animal. The individuals favoured in the development of the cement-ducts now converted into nutriferous roots, had more than others the prospect of abundant food, of vigorous growth, and of producing a numerous progeny. With the further development, assisted by natural selection, of the roots embracing the intestine of the host and spreading amongst its hepatic tubes, the introduction of nourishment through the mouth and all the parts implicated in it, such as the whirling cii-ri, the buccal organs, and the intestine, gradually lost their importance, became aborted by disuse, and finally dis- Chap. XII. EVOLUTION OF THE RHIZOCEPHALA. 139 appeared without leaving a trace of tlieir existence. Protected by the abdomen of the Crab, or by the shell inhabited by the Pagurus, the parasite also no longer required the calcareous test, in which, no doubt, the first Cirripedes settling upon these Decapods rejoiced. This protective covering, having become superfluous, also disappeared, and there remained at last only a soft sack filled with eggs, without limbs, without mouth or alimentary canal, and nourished, like a plant, by means of roots, which it pushed into the body of its host. The Cirripede had become a Ehizocephalon. If it be desired to form a notion of what our parasite may have looked like when half way in its progress from the one form to the other, we may consult the figures given by Darwin, (LepadidEe PI., iv., figs. 1-7) of Anelasma squalicola. This Lepadide, which lives upon Sharks in the North Sea, seems, in fact, to be in the best way to lose its cirri and buccal organs in the same manner. The widely-cleft, shell-less test is supported upon a thick peduncle, which is immersed in the skin of the Shark. The surface of the peduncle is beset with much-ramified, hollow filaments, which " penetrate the Shark's flesh like roots " (Darwin). Darwin looked in vain for cement-glands and cement. It seems to me hardly doubtful, that the ramified hollow filaments are themselves nothing but the cement-ducts converted into nutritive roots, and that it is just in consequence of the development of this new source of nourishment, that the cirri and buccal organs are in the highest degree aborted. All the parts of the mouth are extremely 140 HISTOEY OF CRUSTACEA. Chap. XII. minute; the palpi and exterior maxillas have almost disappeared ; the cirri are thick, inarticulate, and desti- tute of bristles ; and the muscles both of the mouth and cirri are without transverse striation. Darwin found the stomach perfectly empty in the animal examined by him. Having reached the Nauplius, the extreme outpost of the class, retiring furthest into the gray mist of primi- tive time, we naturally look round us to see whether ways may not be descried thence towards other border- ing regions. By the structure of the abdomen in Nauplius we might be reminded, like Oscar Schmidt, of the moveable caudal fork of the Eotatoria, which many regard as near allies of the Crustacea, or at any rate of the Arthropoda ; in the six feet surrounding the mouth we might imagine an originally radiate structure, and so forth. But I can see nothing certain. Even towards the nearer provinces of the Myriopoda and Arachnida I can find no bridge. For the Insecta alone, the development of the Malacostraca may per- haps present a point of union. Like many Zoeae, the Insecta possess three pairs of limbs serving for the reception of nourishment, and three pairs serving for locomotion ; like the Zoeae they have an abdomen with- out appendages ; as in all Zoeae the mandibles in Insects are destitute of palpi. Certainly but little in common, compared with the much which distinguishes these two animal-forms. Nevertheless the supposition that the Insecta had for their common ancestor a Zoea Chap. XII. CONCLUSION. 141 which raised itself into a life on land, may be recom- mended for further examination. Much in what has been adduced above may be erro- neous, many an interpretation may have failed, and many a fact may not have been placed in its proper L'ght. But in one thing, I hope, I have succeeded, — in convincing un^trejudiced readers, that Darwin's theory furnishes the key of intelligibiKty for the develop- mental history of the Crustacea, as for so many other facts inexplicable without it. The deficiencies of this attempt, therefore, must not be laid to the charge of the plan drawn out by the sure hand of the master, but solely to the clumsiness of the workman, who did not know how to find the proper place for every portion of his material. INDEX ACANTHONOTUS. AoANTHONOTTJs Owetiii, 12. AcANTHOSOMA, G4 note. Acaasus, 51, 53. ACHTHERES, 131. percarum, 87, 96. Alloeohestes, 29, 75 note. Alpheus, 49, 59, 125. Amphilochtjs, 11, 75 note. Ajiphipoda, 15, 39, 69, 74, 131. Amphithoe, 11, 78 note, Anceus, 73. Anelasma squalicola, 139. Aniloora, 41. A;HATUS, 8. Pisoilii, 31. Artemia, 83 note. ASELLUS, 71. Atyltjs, 75 note. carinatus, 12. Batea, 75 note. BODOTRIA, 20, 81. BOPYRIDiE, 71, 72, BoPYRDS, 72, 73. Braohtscelus, 40, 76, 78, 91 note, 98, 104, 127. crusculum, 76 note. Brachtxjra, 130. Branosiopoda, 83. CALANIU.ffi;, 107. Caligus, 78 note. Capeella, 75 note, 76, 80. attenuata, 41 note. linearis, 40 note. Caroinvs masnas, 55. Caridina, 49. Gassiwna, 41, 71, 72, 75 note. ENTONISCUS. Cerapus, 11, 75 note, 79, 80. Chalimus, 78 note. CHONDRACANTHrS, 87. CuTHAMALrS, 92. CiRRIPEDIA, 88, 90, 105. Cladocera, 83. CoPEPODA, 20, 84, 96, 107, 123. CoROPmuM, 74, 75 note. dentatum, 76. CORYC^ID^, 107. Ckangon, 49. Crayfish, 97. Cryi'TONisocs planario'ides, 72, 74. Cryptophialtjs, 133. ' minutus, 94. CuMA, 81 note. CUMACEA, 81. Cyclograpsus, 25, 32, 50. Cyclopii)^, 107. Cyclops, 84-86, 90, 103. Cyclopsine, 91. Cymothoa, 73. Cymothoadiens, 72. Cypeidina, 107. Cypets, 82, 107. Cyhtofhioi, 11, 75 note, 104. Cytheee, 107. Daphnia pulex, 75. Deecothoe, 79. Diastylid^, 20, 81. DicHELASPis Warwickii, 136. DuLiCHiA, 75, 76, 104. Edriophthalma, 15, 39, 69. Entomosteaca, 83. Entoniscus, 72. cancrorum, 41, 72, 74. porcellaua2, 41, 73, 74, 124 note. ERICHTHUS. INDEX. PONTELLIDiE. 143 Ehichthus, 66. Eriphia gonngra, 8, 33. Edphausia, 64, 60, 98, 127, 128. eurynome, 51. EVADNE, 75, FiLOGRANA, 112. GAJiMAKrs, 75 note. ambulans, 75. Dugesii, 28. puteanus, Sfl. Gecarcinds, 47,^8. GELASisits, 8, 19, 25, 36, 49. vocans, 36. Glatjcothoe Peronii, 56. Gbapstis, 31, 35. Hermit Crabs, 49, 54, 59, 125. HippA emerita, 49, 54. HrppoLYTE, 49, 59, 125, Hyperia galba, 76 note. Latreillei, 78 note. Martinezii, 77 note. " Hyper ines anormales et ordi- naires," 40 note, 79. Idothea, 71, 72. Insecta, 119 note. IsoPODA, 15, 39, 43, 69, 131. Kepone, 73. L^ffiaiODipODA, 39. Lepas, 89, 91. anatifera, 44. australis, 93 note, 136. LERNiEODisci s porcellaDse, 93 note. Lerkanthroptjs, 87. Lestrigonls, 78 note, 79. Leucifer, 66, 71 notn, 107, 123 note. Leucothoe, 11, 75 jwle. LiGiA, 69, 75 note, 103, 127. Lobster, 48, 98. LcPEA diacantha, 34 note. Macrcra, 49, 130. Maia, 51, 53. Megalops, 125. Melita, 75 note. anisochir, 9. exilii, 9, 11, 28. Fresnelii, 9, 10, 11. insatiabilis, 27, 28. Messalina, 27, 28. palmata, 11, 28. sotipes, 9. valida, 9. MiCRODErTOPTJS, 14 note, 75 note. MoNTAGUA, 75 note. Mysis, 64, 69, 98, 103, 107, 127, 130. " Naupltos-larv^," 13, 14, 17, 58, 82, 84, 86, 89, 96 note, 122, 124. Nebalia, 83. NrPHARGTJS, 39. Ocypoda, S, 33, 36, 49. rhombea, 34. Ohchestia, 75 note, 79, 104. Darwinii, 25, 26. gryphus, 25. sylvieola, 25, 27. tahitensis, 25. telluiis, 25, 27. Tucuraiina, 79. Tucuratinga, SO. Orchestoidea, 75 note. Pagubus, 127, 130. Pal^mon. 49, 56, 59, 98, 125, 130. PALmcRUS, 56, 98, 123, 128. Peltogaster, 95. soeialis, 94. Peneus, 17, 98, 125, 128. ] setiferus, 64 note. Peksephpne, 126 note. Philoscia, 71, 75 no/e,„127. Phronima, 39, 98. sedentaria, 77. Phryxus, 73. Phyllopoda, 83. Phyllosoma, 57, 66. Pinnotheres, 52. podoputiialma, 47. POBOELLANA. INDEX. Polyphemus, 103. PONTELLEDiE, 107. PoROELLANA, 49, 59, 60, 102, 125, 127. stellicola, 53, 126. POKCELLIONIDES, 72. PUANIZA, 73. Prawns, 55-64, 123. Peotella, 75 note. Protula, 112. PYCNOGONiDiE, 96 note. Ranina, 8, 30. Ehizocephala, 88, 93-96, 105, 135. Sacculina purpiirea, 89, 90, 92, 94, 95. ScALPELLUM Peronii, 136. Seegestes, 64 rwte. SEHPULiE, 112. Sesarma, 8, 25, 32, 52. Shrimps, 55. SPHiEKOMA, 72. Sqdilla, 43, 49, 66, 125. Talitrus, 79. Tanais, 41, 43, 71, 73, 104, 128. dubius, 21. Dulongii, 16, 19. Tatuira, 49, 53, 59, 125. Tetraclita porosa, 88, 95. Trildbites, 96 note^ Xantho, 52. XiPHOSUEA, 96 note. ZoE^, 15, 17, 44, 48, 49-68, 122. 124, 128. LONDON: PRINTED BV W. CLOWES AND SONS, DUKK STBKKT, STAUFOHO STBEET, AND CHASING CBOSS. xii.BiisiAnLn SrnKKT, London, Septemhcr, 1868. MR MUKRAY'S GENERAL LIST OF WORKS. ALBERT'S (Prince) SPEECHES AND ADDRESSES OF PUBLIC OCCASIONS; with an Introduction Klvins; some OutIinfi=! of hi3 Character. Portrait. 8vo. 10s. 6cl. ; or Popular Edition. Portrait. Fcap. 8vo. Is. ABBOTT'S (Eet. J.) Philip Musgrave ; or. Memoirs of a Church of England Missionary in the North American Colonies. Post Svo. 2s. ABERCROMBIE'S (John) Enquiries concerning the Intellectual Powers aud tlie Investigation of Truth. Fcap. Svo. 6s. 6d. Philosophy of the Moral Feelings. Fcap. Svo. 4s. ACLAND'S (Rev. CnAiiLEs) Popular Account of the Manners and Customs of India. Post Svo. 2s. /ESOP'S FABLES. A New Translation. "With Historical Preface. By Rev. Thomas James. With 100 Woodcuts, by Tenniel and Wolf. bOth Thousand. Post Svo. 2s. Sd. AGRICULTURAL (The Royal) SOCIETY'S JOURNAL. S^'o. Puhlished half-yearly. AIDS TO FAITH : a Series of Theological Es.says. By various Writers. Edited by William Thomson, D.D., Arcliblshop of York. Svo. 9s. AMBER-WITCH (The). A most interesting Trial for Witch- craft. Translated from the German by Lady Duff Gordon. Post Svo. 2j. ARMY LIST [Tut:). Published IlontJili/ ht/ AtlthorUy. 18mo. ls.6-s. With Additional Niilcs aud IlUis- tratioiis. By W.M. Smith, LL.L). Post Svo. Uniform -wiih the " Stu- dent's Iluuie." [In Pr(paration.) Literary History of Europe, during the 15th, 16th and 17th Centuries. Fourth Edilion. 3 Vols. Svo. 36s. — - Historical Works. Containing History of England, — Middle Ages of Europe, — Literary History of Europe. 10 Vols. Post Svo. 6s. each. - (Arthue) Eemains; in Verse and Prose. Vfilh Pre- face, Memoir, and Portrait. Fcap. Svo. 7*. 6d. HAMILTON'S (James) "Wanderings in North Africa. With Illustra- tions. Post Svo. l-S. HANNAH'S (Eet. Dr.) Bampton Lectures for 18G3; the Divine and Human Elements in Holy Scripture. Svo. lOs. 6J. HART'S ARMY LIST. {Quarterly and Annually.) Svo. HAY'S (J. H. Drummond) Western Barbary, its Wild Tribes and Savage Animals. Post Svo. 2s. HEAD'S (Sir Francis) Horse and his Rider. Woodcuts. Post Svo. 5s. Rapid Journeys across the Pampas. Post Svo. 2s. Bubbles from the Brunnen of Nassau, Illustrations, Post Svo. 7s. Qd. Emigrant. Fcap. Svo. 2s. 6c?. Stokers aud Pokers ; or, the London and North Western Railway. Post Svo. 2s. • (Sir Edmund) Shall and Will; or, Future Au.tiliary Verbs. Fcap. Svo. is. HEBER'S (Bishop) Journey through the Upper Provinces of India, from Cileutta to Bombay, with an Accmint (if a Jdurney to Madras and the Southern Pfoviuces. Twelftli Edition. 2 Vols. Post Svo. 7s. Poetical Works, including Palestine, Europe, The Red Sea, llj mns, &c. Sixth Edilion. Portrait. Fcap. Svo. 6s. • Hymns adapted to the Weekly Church Service of ths Year. 16mo. Is. 6d. HERODOTUS. A New English Yersion. Edited, with Notes and Essays, historical, ethnographical, and geogrnphical, by Uev. G. Eawliksoij, assisted by Sib Henby Rawlinson and Sib J. G. AVil- Ki.Nsos. Second Edilion. Maps and Woodcuts. 4 Vols. Svo. 18s. 16 LIST OF WORKS FOREIGN HANDBOOKS. HA-ND-BOOK— TRAVEL-TALK. English, French, German, and Italian. 18mo. 3s. 6d. NORTH GERMANY,— Holland, Beloium, Prus- sia, and the Rhine fiora Holliiiid to Switzerland. Map. Post 8vo. 10». SOUTH GERMANY, Bavaria, Austria, Styria, Salzberg, the Austrian and Bavarian Alps, the Tyrol, Hungary, and tlie Danube, from Ulm to the Black Sea. Map. Post 8vo. 10s. KNAPSACK GUIDE TO THE TYROL. PostSvo. 6s. PAINTING. German, Flemish, and Dutch Schools. Woodcuts. 2 Vols. Post 8vo. 24s. LIVES OF THE EARLY FLEMISH PAINTERS, By CiiOWE and Cavalcaselle. Illustrations. PoatSvo. 12s. SWITZERLAND, Alps of Savoy, and Piedmont. Maps. Post Svo. 10s. KNAPSACK GUIDE TO SWITZERLAND. Post 8vo. 5s. FRANCE, Normandy, Brittany, the French Alps, the Rivers Loire, Seine, Rhone, and Garonne, Dauphin(5, Provence, and the Pyrenees. Maps. Post Svo. 12s. CORSICA and SARDINIA. Maps. Post Svo. 4s. PARIS, and its Environs. Map and Plans. Post Svo. 3s. 6d. *»* MuRRA-s's Plan op Paris, mounted on canvas. 3's. 6J. SPAIN, Andalusia, Ronda, Granada, Valencia, Cata- lonia, Gallicia,Arragon, and Navarre. Maps. PostSvo. (In the Pre-,s.) PORTUGAL, Lisbon, &c. Map. Post Svo, 9s. NORTH ITALY, Piedmont, Liguria, Venetia, Lombardy, Parma, Modeua, and Romagna. Map. PostSvo. 12s. CENTRAL ITALY, Lucca, Tuscany, Florence, The Marches, Umbria, and the Patrimony of St. Peter's. Map. PostSvo. IDs. ROME AND ITS Environs. Map. Post Svo. 9s. SOUTH ITALY, Two Sicilies, Naples, Pompeii, Herculaneum, and Vesuvius. Map. Post Svo. lOs. • KNAPSACK GUIDE TO ITALY. Post Svo. 6s. SICILY, Palermo, Messina, Catania, Syracuse, Etna, and the Ruins of the Greek Temples. Map. Post Svo. 12s. . PAINTING. The Italian Schools. Edited by Sir Chaelbs Eastlake, R. A. Woodcuts. 2 Vols. PostSvo. 30s. LIVES OF ITALIAN PAINTERS, from CiMAunE to Bassano. By Mrs. Jameson. Portraits. Post Svo. 10s. ed. DENMARK, Sweden, and Norway. Xeir Edidon. Maps. Post Svo. (7;i Preparation.) PUBLISHED BY MR. MURRAY. 17 HAND-BOOK— KNAPSACK GUIDE TO NORWAY, Map. Po3t Svc. 5s. GREECE, the Ionian Islands, Albania, Thessaly, and Macedonia. Maps. PostSro. [In preparatiim.) TURKEY, Malta, Asia Minor, ConBtantinople, Armenia, Mesopotamia, &c. Maps. Post 8vo. [In preparation.) EGYPT, Thebes, the Nile, Alexandria, Cairo, the Pyramids, Mount Siuai, &c. Map. Post 8vo. 155. • HOLY LAND — Syria and Palestink, Peninsula of Sinai, Edom, and Syrian Desert. Maps. 2 Vols. FustSvo. 21s. INDIA. — Bombay anb Madkas. Map. 2 Vols. Post. 8vo. 21s. RUSSIA,- St. PEiEESBURan, Moscow, Poland, and Finland. Maps. Post 870. 15s. ENGLISH HANDBOOKS. HAND-BOOK— MODERN LONDON. Map. 16mo. 3s. Qd. WESTMINSTER ABBEY. Woodcuts. 16mo. Is. KENT AND SUSSEX, Canterbury, Dover, Rams- gate, Slieernes-i, Rocliester, Chatham, Woolwich, Brighton, Chichester, Worthing, Hastings, Lewas, Arundel, iStc. Mnp. Post 8vo. 10s. SURREY AND HANTS, Kingston, Croydon, Rei- gate, Guildford, Wincliester, Southampton, Portsmouth, and Isle of Wight. Maps. Post 8vo. 10s. WILTS, DORSET, AND SOMERSET, Salisbury, Chippenham, Weymouth, Sherborne, Wells, Bath, Bristol, Taunton, &c. Map. Post 8vo. DEVON AND CORNWALL, Exeter, Ilfracombe, Linton, Sidmouth, Dawlish, Teignmoulh, Plymouth, Davouport, Tor- quay, Liaunceston, Truro, Penzance, Falmouth, i&c. Maps. PostSvo. 10s. BERKS, BUCKS, AND OXON, Windsor, Eton, Reading, Aylesbury, Uxbridge, Wycombe, Henloy, the City and Uni- versity of Oxford, and the Descent of the Thames. Map. Peat 8vo. 7s. M. ; GLOUCESTER, HEREFORD, and WORCESTER Cirencester, Cheltenham, Stroud, Tewkesbury, Leominster, Ross, Mai vern, Kidderminster, Dudley, Bromsgrovo, Evesham, Map. Post 8vo. 6s. M. CATHEDRALS OP GLOUCESTER, HERE- PORD and WoRCESTEB. Illustrations. 2s. 6d. each, or in 1 Vol., Post 8vo. 8s. 6f the Manufacture. Third and revistdand enlarged Edition. Plates and Woodcuts. Svo. [Nearly Ready.) (Horace) Jutland, the Danish Isles, and Copen- hagen. Illustrations. 2 Vols. Post Svo. 24s. Sweden and Isle of Gothland. Illustrations. 2 Vols. Post Svo. 2Ss. MAKSH'S (G. P.) Student's Manual of the English Language. Post Svo. 7s. Qd. MAUEEL'S (Jules) Essay on the Character, Actions, and Writings of the Duke of Wellington. Second Edition. Fcap. Svo. Is. 6d. MAYNE'S (Capt.) Four Years in British Columbia and Van- couver Island. Its Forests, Rivers, Coasts, and Gold Fields, and Resources for Colonisation. Illustrations. Svo. 16s. MELVILLE'S (Hermann) Typee and Omoo; or. Adventures amongst the Marquesas and South Sea Islands. 2 Vols. Post Svo. 78. MILLS' (Eev. John) Three Months' Eesidence at Nablus, with an Account of the Modern Samaritans. Illustrations. Post Svo. 10s. 6d. MILMAN'S (Dean) Historical Works. Containing: 1. History of the Jews, 3 Vols. 2. Ilistory of Early Christiauity, 8 Vols. 3. His- tory of Latin Christianity, U Vols. Post Svo. Bs. each. — Annals of St. Paul's Cathedral. Portrait and Illus- trations. Svo. (In preparation.) Character and Conduct of the Apostles considered as an Evidence of Christianity. Svo. 10s. 6d. Translations from the Agamemnon of .^schylus and Bacchanals of Euripides. With IlluBtratious. Crown Svo. 12s. Works of Horace. With 100 woodcuts. Small Svo. 7s.6c^. Life of Horace. Woodcutp. Svo. 9s. — Poetical Works. Plates. 3 Vols. Fcap. Svo. 18s. Fall of Jerusalem. Fcap. Svo. Is. (Capt. E. A.) Wayside Cross. A Tale of the Carllst War. Post Svo. 2s. 21 LIST OF WORKS MEREDITH'S (Mrs. CnAiiLEs) Notes and Sketches of New South Wales. Post 8vo. 2s. MESSIAH (THE): A Narrative of the Life, Travels, Death, Uesurrection, and Ascension of our Blessed Lord. By the Author of " Life of Bibhop Ken." Map. 8vo. 18s. MICHIE'S (Alexander) Siberian Overland Route from Peking to Petei-sbuig, througli the Deserts and Steppes of Jlongolia, 'J'artary, &c. Maps and lUiisiraticns. 8vo. 16«. MODERN DOMESTIC COOKERY. Founded on Principles of Economy and Practical KnowIed(;o and adapted for Private Families. New Jidition. Woodcuts. Fcap. Svo. 5s. MOORE'S (Thomas) Life and Letters of Lord Byron. Plates. 6 Vols. Fcap. Svo. 18s. ; or! Vol. Portraits. Royal 8to. 9s. MOTLEY'S (J. L.) History of the United Netherlands: from the Death < f William the Silent to the Twelve Years' Tnice, 16C9. Embrac- ing the English-Dutch struggle ugain.st Spain; and a detailed Account of the Siianisli Armada. Portraits. 4 Vols. Svo. 60s. Or Popular Edit on. 4 Vols. Post Svo. 6s. each. MOUHOT'S (Henri) Siam, Cambojia, and Lao; a Narrative of Travels and Discoveries. Illustrations. 2 vols. 8vo. 32j. MOZLEY'S (Rev. J. B.) Treatise on Predestination. Svo. lis. Primitive Doctrine of Baptismal Regeneration. Svo. Ts.Gd", MUNDY'S (General) Pen and Pencil Sketches in India. Third Edition. Plates. Post Svo. 7s. 6rf. MUNRO'S (General Sir Thomas) Life and Letters. By the Rev. G. R. Gleio. Post Svo. 3s. 6ii. MTJRCHISON'S (Sir Roderick) Russia in Europe and the Ural Mountains. With Coloured Maps, Plates, Sections, &c. 2 Vols. Royal 4to. 5?. 5s. Siluria ; or, a History of the Oldest Rocks con- taining Organic Remains. Fourth Edition. Map and Plates. Svo.SOj. IdURRAY'S RAILWAY READING. Containing:— tfiTON. By L( NlURODOnTUE UUASE, U. Ebsats prom "Tub Tiubs Music and Dbess. Is. LaTARD'h ACCOUNTOFlVlNEVEn. 5», MiLMATi'a Fall oi' Jeudsalitm. It, MaHON's "FoRTT-FlVK." 3«. LiPB OF Tbeoiiouk Hook. 1«. DKEDfl OF Naval Dabiho. 3*. 6((. Tub Honet Bee. 1«. James' vEsop's Fablkb. ^s.6d. NiMROD ON THE TuilP. 1*. Grf. Art OF Dining. Is.dd. 6d. 2 Vols. S«. Ram.am's Lttkrart Esbats. 2#. Mauon's Joan op Arc. Ij, Heah'b E.migrant. 25. Grf. NiMROD ON THE UOAD. Is, Crokeb ON TUB Guillotine. U. UoLLWAit's Norway. 2s. Maubkl's Wellington. Is.Gd. CAniPBELL's Life uf Baco.i. '2»,6d, The Flower Garden. Is. Ijockuart's Spanish Ballads. Ht.Bd. Taylor's Notko from Life. 24. Rejected Addresbkb. 1*. Fknn'b Hintb UN Angling. It. MUSIC AND DRESS. By a Ladt. Reprinted from the " Quarterly Review." Fcap. Svo. Is. NAPIER'S (Sir Chas.) Life; chiefly derived from his Journals and Letters. By Sin W. Napteb. Second Edition. Portraits. 4 Vols. Post Svo. 4Ss. (Sir Wm.) Life and Letters. Edited by H. A. Bruce, M.P. Portraits. 2 Vols. Crown Svo. 28s. English Battles and Sieges of the Peninsular War. Fourth Edition. Porti ait. Post Svo. 9s. 25 NAUTICAL (The) ALMANACK. Eoyal 8vo. 2s. 6(^. {By Aulhorittj.) NAVY LIST ^The). {Published Quarterly, hy Authority.) 16mo. 2s. ed. NE"W TESTAMENT (Illusteatkd) . With Explanatory Com- nientaiy. Edited by ARcnoEACON Ciiurton, M.A., and Bash, Jones, JI.A. Witli 110 nulhentic Views of Flucfs, Crom Slcntclies and Plioto- graphs tiiken on ihe spot. 2 Vols. Croivu Svo. 30s. cloth ; 52s. 6d. calf; 63j. morocco. NICHOLLS' (Sir Geoege) History of the English, Irish and Scotch Poor Laws. 4 Vols. Svo. (Eev. H. G.) Historical Account of the Forest of Dean. Woodcuts, &c. Post Svo. \0s.6d. NICOLAS' (Sir Harris) Historic Peerage of England. Exhi- biting the Origin, Descent, and Present State of every Title of Peer- age which has existed in this Country since the Conquest. By William Courthdpe. Svo. 30s. NIMROD On the Chace— The Turf— and The Eoad. Woodcuts. Fcap. Svo. 3s. 6d. ' OLD LONDON ; Papers read at the London Congress of the Archseological Institute, July, 1866. By A. J. B. Berksford Hope, M.P. ; Dean Stanl'Y, D.D.; G. T. Clauk, Esq ; G. Gilbert Scott. R A, ; Professor Westmacott, R. A.; Edward Foss, F.S. A.; Joseph BuRTT, Esq.; Rev. J. R. Green; George Sciiarf, F.S. A. With Iliustration.s. Svo. 12s. OXENHAM'S (Rev. W.) English Notes for Latin Elegiacs ; designed for early Proficients in the Art of Latin Versification, with Prefatory Rules of Composition in Elegiac Metre. Fourth Edition. 12mo. 3s. Sd. OXFORD'S (Bishop of) I'opular Life of William Wilberforce. Portrait. Post Svo. 10s. 6c/. PARIS' (Dr.) Philosophy in Sport made Science in Earnest ; or, the First Principles of Natural Philosophy inculcated by aid of the Toys and Sports of Youth. AHnth Edition. Woodcuts. Post Svo. 7s.6ti. PAEKYNS' (Maespield) Life in Abyssinia : During a Three Years' Residence and Travels in that Countiy. Neiti Edition, viith Map uni 30 Illustrations. Post Svo. 7s. 6d. PEEL'S (Sir Eobert) Memoirs. Edited by Earl Stanhope and Mr. Cardvtell. 2 Vols. Post Svo. 7s. 6iZ. each. PENN'S (Eiohard) Maxims and Hints for an Angler and Chess- player. i\'«!o Edition. Wnodcute. Fcap. Svo. Is. PENROSE'S (F. C.) Principles of Athenian Architecture, and the Optical Refinements exhibited in the Construction of the Ancient Buildings at Athens, from a Survey. With 40 Plates. Folio. 5?. 5s. PEECY'S (John, M.D.) Metallurgy of Fuel, Coal, Fire-Clayp, Copper, Zinc, Brass, &c. Illtistrutinns. Svo. 21s. — Metallurgy of Iron and Steel. Illustrations. Svo. 42s, Metallurgy of Lead, Silver, Gold, Platinum, Niikcl, Cobalt, Antimimy, Bismuth, Arsenic, &c. Illustrations. Svo. [In tke Press.) PHILLIPP (C. S. M.) On Jurisprudence. Svo. 12s. PHILLIPS' (John) Memoirs of William Smith, (the Father of Geo- logy). Portrait. Svo. 7s. 6d. Geology of Yorkshire, The Coast, and Limestone District. Plates. 4to. Part I., 20s.— Part II., 30s. Rivers, Mountains, and Sea Coast of Yorkshire. With Essays on the Climate, Scenery, and Ancient InhabitAnts. Second Edition, Plates. Svo. 158. 26 LIST OP WORKS PHILPOTTS' (Bisnop) Letters to the late Charles Butler, on Lis " liook of tli« Uoman Ciitliolifi Cluiroh." New Edition. Post 8vo. Gs. POPE'S (Alexander) Life and Works. A New Edition. Coa- taiiiiuK neuily 500 iiiipublislied I.ettcrs. Edited, with a Nkw Lu'i;, IntroductioiiB and Notes, by Rev. Wuitwell Elwik. l'ortrait:i 8vo, (7)1 the Press.) PORTEli'S (Eev. J. L.) Five Years in Damascus. With Travels to Palmyra, Lebanon and other Scripture Sites. Map and Woodcuts. 2 Vols, Post 8vo. 21s. Handbook for Syria and Palestine : includingan Account of the GengrHpliy,IliKtoi7,Antiquitie8, and InhabitaiitsoftheseCountries, the Peninsula of Sinai, Jidom, and the Syrian Desert. Maps. 2 Vol;. Post 8vo. 24s. PRAYER-BOOK (Illtjsthatbd), with Borders, Initials, Vig- nettes, &c. Edited, with Noies, by Rev. Tnos. Jameb. Mediu:.i 8vo. 18s. cloth ; 31s. 6d. calf ; 36s. morocco. PUSS IN BOOTS. With 12 Illustrations. By Otto Speokte^. 16mo. Is. dd. nr Coloured, 2s. 6er Edition. With 600 Woodcuts. Royal Svo. BRADBUnY, EVA^a, AND CO., miNxmS, WHITEralAilS. MACLACHLANtSTLVMHT EDINBUnGH.