/ \! Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https ://arch i ve . o rg/detai Is/b2803851 4 V I DESCRIPTION OF THE GENUS CINCHONA. DESCRIPTION OF THE GENUS CINCHONA, COMPREHENDING THE VARIOUS SPECIES OF VEGETABLES FROM WHICH THE PERUVIAN AND OTHER BARKS OF A SIMILAR QUALITY ARE TAKEN. ILLUSTRATED BY FIGURES OF ALL THE SPECIES EIITHERTO DISCOVERED. TO WHICH IS PREFIXED PROFESSOR VALIL’S DISSERTATION ON THIS GENUS, READ BEFORE THE SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY AT COPENHAGEN. / G / ** ALSO /> n 1 A DESCRIPTION, ACCOMPANIED BY FIGURES, OF A NEW GENU* C' NAMED HYyENANCHE: or, HYiENA POISON. LONDON: PRINTED FOR 1?. AND J. WHITE, AT HORACE’S HEAD, FLEET-STREET. M.DCC.XC VI I . ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS LIBRARY CLASS ACCN. isrs>7 SOURCE / DATE PREFATORY ADVERTISEMENT. The feveral fpecies of the genus Cinchona, from which the Peruvian and other Barks of a fimilar quality are taken, have been hitherto but little known to the Botanifts of Europe ; and even the principal fpecies, the Cinchona Officina- lis, fo long eftabliffied in the pra£tice of Phyfic as one of the happieft of modern difcoveries, was R but obfcurely known till about the year 1738, when Monf. Condamine elucidated its Hiftory, a 2 and r [ viii ] and gave its Botanical Charafters with the necef- fary degree of precifion. Since that period fo greatly has the fcience of Botany been enriched by the difcoveries of Naturalifts, that no lefs than twelve fpecies of Cinchona are now found to exift. Of thefe, fome of the principal have been excellently defcribed by Profelfor Vahl of Copenhagen, of whofe Dif- fertation on the fubje£l we here give a tranfla- tion ; with the addition of other fpecies fince difcovered ; accompanied by figures taken from the fpecimens themfelves, preferved in the Her- barium of Sir Jofeph Banks, and affifted by draw- ings in his pofTefTion. By this means perfons refiding in thofe parts of the world in which any fpecies of the ge- nus [ ix ] nus may occur, will be enabled to afcertain, whether what they have difcovered be new, or already defcribed ; and thus the moll inte- refling additions may probably be made to the medical treafures we at prefent polTefs in this highly important genus. IN the courfe of printing this work, fome few inaccuracies have efcaped the Author’s obfervation : — it is neceflary to remark the fol- lowing : Page 13. 1. 3, from bottom, for a Mr. Wright , read Dr. Wright . From this gentleman, who is lately returned to the Weft Indies, many more valuable difcoveries in Botany may be expefled. Page 30. 1. 5, from bottom, for 46 read 36. Page 38. 1. 15, for Beavais read Beauvois. In page 39. 1. 19. after the word lions, add the following note; “ Meaning the Puma , fometimes called the American lion — a very different fpecies from the common lion.” P R OF ESSOR VAHL’S DISSERTATION ON THE r GENUS CINCHONA. / . ♦ TO THE LINNALAN SOCIETY OF LONDON, AND TO SIR JOSEPH BANKS,. Bart.. KNIGHT OF THE MOST HONOURABLE ORDER OF THE BATH, AND PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY, BY WHOSE LIBERAL AND FRIENDLY COMMUNICATIONS, ACCOMPANIED BY ORIGINAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIMENS FROM HIS HERBARIUM, THIS WORK HAS BEEN SO AMPLY ENRICHED, IT IS NOW INSCRIBED, WITH THE GREATEST' RESPECT, BY AYLMER BOURKE LAMBERT, FELLOIF OF THE ROYAL AND ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETIES, ETC.- F1CE- PRESIDENT OF THE LINN JEAN S0C1ETT. a . ■ ■air Ol : QJ HO YTaiOCtt VJAAMMU ot a;:\ - ■ ' n -io «a«tto aiat.sv. ■ ,-n ^r, ?...y , . t, , . aitA ' \ - ^ ’ O ...a :l . \ t ,, _ 7 u ■ 1 HE want of an exaCt knowledge from what plant this or that particular medicine is taken, is not one of the lealt caufes of the prefent imperfection of the Hiltory of Phytic ; and notwithftanding the extenlivenefs of com- merce in thefe latter times, and the opportunities thereby afforded to the cultivators of Natural Hiltory of ex- amining the productions of various countries in their native foil, and even in regions from whence felf-intereft had before excluded them, we are ftill ignorant from whence feveral medicines are prepared, which we every day ufe in the practice of Phyfic. To this ignorance mult like wife be attributed that uncertainty which pre- vails in the operations of particular medicines, and the different opinions which have prevailed relative to their effects on the human body ; and this relates not only to fuch vegetables as are brought from diftant regions, but even to thofe which are natives of our own coun- try. From the hotter climates we receive feveral medi- cines, which, though coming from different places, are called by the fame title ; and many European plants are in one place commended for their lingular efficacy, A while \ [ * ] while in another they are found to be quite ineffectual ; which difference has been owing to having gathered roots, leaves, &c. of a very different plant from the real one fo highly efteemed in fome particular fpot. This error is the eafier to commit, as it often happens that the names of plants growing in the northern parts of Europe are often given to feveral of thofe of the fouth, though the plants themfelves are very different, not having been properly collated. As a proof of this I will adduce only two inffances : The Radix Bugloffi in Italy is taken from a very different plant from our own (which is the Anchu- fa officinalis), a plant which I have found in but few places of the fouth of Europe, and which is in general rare. On the contrary, the fpecies mentioned by Profef- for Retzius in the firft fafciculus of his Obfervations, p. 12, under the name of Anchufa Italica, is there full as common as the A. officinalis with us, and is ac- cordingly there made ufe of ; and though it differs very much from ours, yet it is confidered by moft of the bo- tanifts of the fouth of Europe as the fame plant with the above northern one, which they have never feen, and of courfe know not how to diftinguiffi. In the garden of an hofpital at Genoa, the Symphytum tuberofum was cul- tivated for the ufe of the apothecaries inftead of the offi- cinale, which is the true Confolida major of the Materia Medica. I pafs over many fimilar examples of different plants being confidered as the fame in different places, even though t 3 ] though much more diffimilar than the abovementioned. But if fuch miflakes are committed by thofe from whom a folid and exadt knowledge of the proper diflindtions of plants might be expedled, what may we not apprehend to be the cafe, when the gathering of them is committed to the care of perfons hill lefs able to diftinguifh fuch pro- ductions ? Their knowledge of plants confifls in acci-i dental diiiindlions, and is often confined to their being accuilomed to find them in fome particular place or other ; a circumifance which is often capable of giving two different plants a fimilar afpedt. As this happens every day, it is unneceffary to infill upon it. We need only fearcli the heaps which are brought to the apothecaries* fhops, in order to difcover plants of very different fpecies from thofe prefcribed by phyficians. How greatly would the knowledge of medicine be confirmed, and how many excellent remedies, grounded on the experience of all ages, would be in our poffeffion, if our anceflors had handed down to us as fure charadteriflics of the plants they made ufe of, as the praifes of their qualities ! Our Ma- teria Medica would not then have been filled with a number of ufelefs articles ; and the conjedlures of latter ages about the medicines recommended by the ancients would have been fpared, while the knowledge of effi- cacious medicines would have been rendered perma- nent and certain for the benefit of mankind. After the lapfe of centuries, mankind have employed all their in- dultry to find out the plants mentioned by Diofcorides and others of the ancients, and at length have difcovered A 2 that [ 4 ] that the purfuit was to no purpofe. They were obliged to leave the plants of the ancients, and their virtues, in the fame degree of obfcurity in which they were involved,, and to begin de novo the experiments on their medical qualities. All that was gained by their fearch was, that of about five hundred plants mentioned by Diofcorides, there were hardly twenty known to a certainty, and of them only fuch as can be conlidered as culinary or dietetic plants. The multitude of ufelefs and uncertain remedies with which the apothecaries’ fhops were filled, and of which, even in our times, we have not been able to rid them, is to be charged to thofe examinations, and proved the only confequence of then' labours. We need only mention Hellebore as a proof of this. The variety of opinions among the ancients, relative to the plant to which Sneezewort belongs, which is fo highly com- mended by the ancients, added to the ftores of medicinal fhops no lei's than ten forts of roots, fome entirely ufelefs, and others very different in quality from that of the an- cients, which is yet not certainly known. Butwhyfhould we not exculpate both the ancients and their expositors, who lived in very different climates ? Botany, in their time, had not been reduced to the form of a fcience ; it is our own age that has given it order and certainty. But notwithftanding this advantage over the ancients, and the opportunity afforded us of examining many of the remedies which the vegetable kingdom affords, even in their native climates, yet we are ffill in a flate of uncer- tainty with refpe&to many which are infrequent ufe, as to the y t 5 ] the clafs or family to which they ought to be referred, and with refpedt to fome we are entirely ignorant. Much light, however, has of late years been thrown on this fubjedt, and we have learnt to a certainty the plants from which various medicines are procured ; having infallible marks or characters by which to diltinguifh their affinities : our experience therefore will not be loft to pofterity as that of the ancients has been to us, but will remain as long as the plants themfelves. No one will deny that the knowledge of plants, grounded on their effential parts, which are con- ftant and obvious, is the fureft method of preferving the knowledge of their qualities, when once difcovered, from perifhing, as well as of determining any doubts or dis- putes relative to that point. The fight is unqueftionably lefs liable to uncertainty than the fmell and tafte, which are capable of being perverted by feveral accidents in fuch a manner as to give uncertain indications ; and how many plants are there, which, though fimilar in fmell and talfe, are yet very different in their effeCts ! To this may be added the impoflibility of explaining by words thefe fenfations to others : it is furely far eafier to inform people through the medium of fight. It may ftill be objedted, perhaps, that colour, a particular afforded by our fight, is ftill an uncertain character, and is known to vary. Had we no other characters but the internal ones by which we might communicate to pofterity the knowledge of thofe remedies from which we have re- ceived fo much advantage, they would become both uncertain, and in a little time as unprofitable to them' as. [ 6 ] as thofe of the ancients are to us ; they would foon be commuted for others ; our experiments would be laughed at, and pofterity would lofe the benefit of our difcoveries. Thefe are not new truths, but fuch as are well known, and have often been demonftrated by others ; yet they are important, as they ferve to evince the ufes of botanical fcience. A certain and exadft know- ledge of plants from which medicines are taken, is flill more neceffary with refpedt to fuch plants as are not cul- tivated, but grow wild. By frequent gathering, thefe plants are liable to be too much diminifhed, fo as not to afford a fufficient fupply when requifite, and even to be quite extirpated from the places in which they were firft colledted. If then we did not know the plant from which fuch a medicine was prepared, we fhould not be capable of afcertaining by fearch, whether nature might not have produced it in other fpots; and if we were not able to find it, we muft either be without the defired remedy or fpecific againft particular difeafes, or elfe even wifh to have it lefs know'll, on account of its fmall quantity. The lofs would be the more felt, as the difcoveries of ages might perhaps fcarcely exhibit any thing that would fo completely an- fwer our purpofes. An extenfive knowledge of the ve- getable kingdom, acquaintance with the natural affinities of plants, would perhaps be the only means of leading to the difcovery, and on fuch an occafion might compen- fate for what we had loft ; fince, if we wifh to find a reme- dy that moll nearly approaches to any particular one, it can fcarcely be looked for amongftfuch as Nature has fet 6 at [ 7 ] at a wide diftance from it. The nearer the feveral parts of plants approach to each other in point of refemblance, there is fo much the greater reafon for fuppofing a fimi- larity of their virtues. He who underftands nature will hardly doubt of this : daily experience furnifhes proofs of it, not only amongft the vegetable tribes, but alfo in the other kingdoms of nature, and this in proportion to the natural affinities. The genus of plants which I have now the honour to propofe to the Society, increafed by the defcriptions of fome of the lefs known fpecies, will ferve as a further proof of what has been advanced. Among the many excellent medicines which have reached our knowledge lince the difcovery of the New World, the Peruvian Bark deferves undoubtedly thefirff place. It has been tried in vain to find a fubftitute for it, fcarcely any thing having been yet difcovered which might fuperfede its ufe. The obftacles which it met with before it was univerfally adopted, and the different opi- nions relative to its effedfs, are fufficiently known. As they do not belong to my fcope, it is fuperfluous to treat of them : the caufe of the difference in the experiments made with the Peruvian Bark muff be afcribed in part to the frauds which are pradtifed in mixing it with other in- gredients of fimilar colour and tafte, though very differ- ent in operation, and perhaps even of a contrary nature and of a pernicious effedt. Men, while anxious in fup- port [ 8 ] port of their own opinions, did not endeavour to difcover the true fource of tliefe variations : it was long before the -diftindtive characters, by which the genuine was to be diftinguifhed from the fpurious, were attended to. If a more accurate knowledge of the trees the bark of which thus increafed the quantity had not been wanting, or if the tree from which the true bark was taken had been known, we fhould have been, at leaft in part, better able to judge in the matter. Attempts have been made, even till the prefent time, to difcover fome other remedies which might fupply its place, but without fuccefs : this enquiry is fo much the more neceflary, fince, according to Monf. Condamine’s account, publifhed more than half a century ago in the Mem. de l’Academie des Sciences, for the year 1738, p. 324 (edit. Amfterdam), we may fome time or other be neceffitated to lofe the Peruvian Bark ; the trees being at that time fo much diminifhed in Peru by fre- quent decortication, that it was apprehended that in future even a fmall quantity could fcarce be obtained from them. Later experience has fhewn that this opinion was not en- tirely void of foundation. The accounts which I have been enabled to colledt during my refidence in Spain, all agree in affirming that the tree is nearly extindt in thofe places where it was formerly found in the greateft abun- dance : yet, though it has not been difeovered in any other region, our fear is vanifhed as to our one day lofing fo neceffary a drug. Various botanifts, who in thefe latter times have travelled in the Weft Indies to inveffigate the natural productions of that part of the world, have found feveral r [ 9 1 feveral fpecies of this genus, which not only refemble the fir ft difcovered fpecies as to their qualities, but which even feem, in fome refpecfts, to furpafs it. The Peruvian Bark was made ufe of during a whole cen- tury, without its being known from what tree it was taken; and this ignorance would have ftill continued, had not fome botanifts obtained an opportunity of feeing it in its native country. The firft whom we have to thank for certain and authentic information concerning the genus, is Monf. Condamine. It continued, however, almoft inacceflible to us after that time, its native country not being eafily vifited by naturalifts. Few botanifts have feen it, and all that we know of it is confined to what Monf. Condamine has related. The various figures we are in pofleffion of are all borrowed from him, though his reprefentation cannot be efteemed a perfect one, and has the appearance of being in fome points a little artifi- cial. From what I fhall proceed to mention, it will be evident that Linnaeus never fawr it, but availed himfelf of Condamine’s defcription and figure to eftablifh the cha- racters of the genus. From the time of Condamine to that of Jacquin’s vifit to the Caribbee Iflands, only one fpecies was known. Jacquin difcovered another, which w'as regarded by Linnaeus as dubious, differing in fome inconfiderable points from the Peruvian fpecies. The fruit of the Caribbean fpecies was not at that time known ; but having fince been examined, it clearly be- longs to the fame genus. Mr. Forfter difcovered a third B fpecies \ [ 10 ] fpecies in the iflands of Tongataboo and Eaoree in the South Sea. A fourth was fent from Martinique by Monf* Badier, which is known by the name of Quinquina Piton. Profeflor Swartz, who fome years ago made a voyage to the Antilles, belides increafing the vegetable catalogue of thofe parts with eight hundred and fifty new fpecies, not- withftanding the prior vifits of thofe indefatigable botanifis Plumier, Sloane, Jacquin, and Brown, enriched the genus Cinchona with two new fpecies, of which one was found in Hifpaniola, and the other in Jamaica ; which latter? however, he delcribed from a fpecimen in Sir Jofeph Banks’s collection. As an addition to all tlrefe, I have the honour to exhibit three more, of which one is changed with the Peruvian, and the two others I look upon as un- known, not having been able to find them any where de~ fcribed. The genus is c.onfequently increafed to nine fpecies. All the fpecies which confiitute this genus agree in the following circumftances, viz. The trunk is a tree : the bark of the branches is of a dark brown-red colour, in fome fpecies covered with foft hairs towards the extremities, but in molt fpecies without : at the bottom thefe branches are round, and frequently of a whitifh grey, but at the top they become imperceptibly tetragonous : thofe which bear flowers are diftinguifhed from the others by being alternately comprefled to the top : the leaves are oppolite ; inferted to the branch by a fliort pedicle ; their edges are fmooth, or entire, without any denticulations ; their lower furface is fomewhat more venous, and fome- times the oblique fibres are covered with foft £air ; the 4 "PPcr [ II ] tipper furface is generally without hair : the fub fiance of the leaves is fomewhat membranaceous, and bears a re- femblanceto that of coffee-leaves : at both lides, betwixt the leaves, is a ftipule, which is clofely fldpreffed to the branch : the peduncles fit commonly at the top of the branches of the umbel, thefe branches being always di- vided into three, of which the laft bears one flower only. T wo fpecies have the flowers fitting in the angle formed by the leaves with the branches, and of thefe one fpecies has only one flower on the peduncle. Where the pe- duncle is divided into more ramifications, there are two fmall bradtese at the larger, and one at the fmaller. The calyx is one-leafed, above the germen, corolliform, in the fame manner as in plants that have oppofite leaves and flipules. Sometimes the calyx is only a kind of margin, but always divided into five fmall points, and much fliorter than the corol : the corol is funnel-form, monopetalous, divided into five parts; the flamina five, inferted at the middle of the interior part of the tube, being either fliorter than the tube, or of equal length with the corol ; they are flender and eredt : the germen is conical, and bent down, with a pointed tip ; the flyle is thread-form, of the length of the flamina ; the lligma thicker, and fomewhat bipartite : the fruit is an oblong capfule, open- ing in two parts. From both corners of each part there is a difiepiment feparated in the middle with a crevice : the feeds are comprelfed, and furrounded with a mem- branaceous margin. All the fpecies are natives of the New World, one excepted, which was difcovered by B 2 Dr, [ 12 ] Dr. Forfter in the South Sea iflands. In the other parts of the world there has as yet been no fpecies difcovered. Three fpecies only are found on the continent of Ame- rica, and the reft in the Caribbean illands : they feem to prefer mountainous lituations. The genera moft allied to Cinchona are Manettia, Ron- deletia, Macrocnemum, Bellonia, Portlandia, and fome others ; and thefe feem to conned! the laft divilion of the Stellatae of Linnaeus, fuch as Coffea, Ixora, Pavetta, with the family of Contortae, to which Cinchona, as to the fruit, is nearly related; but it differs in having the fruit below the calyx, and in the divifions of the co- rol not being contorted into a fpiral before their expan- fi°n. The fpecies of this genus are as follows : 1. Cinchona officinalis. This is the fpecies from which is taken the genuine Peruvian Bark, and is that which was firft difcovered : it is the fpecies which has given the character of the genus, and is confequently that which Linnaeus mentions in the old editions of his Syftema Naturae, and in the 6th edition of his Genera Planta- rum. 2. Cinchona pubefcens. So named from the pubefcent appearance on the backs of the leaves : its native place the fame as the foregoing. From the ffiort and incomplete defcription [ 13 ] defcription given by Condamine of a fpecies of Cinchona growing on the fummits of mountains, and of a whitifh appearance, it fhould feem to be this. 3. C. macrocarpa. So named from the fuperior fize of the fruit in comparifon to that of the others. This is the fpecies difcovered by Mutis in large woods in Santa Fe in America : it is undoubtedly this fpecies which Linnaeus defcribes in the twelfth edition of the Syftema Naturae. On comparing Linnaeus’s defcription with that of Conda- mine, and the figure given by him of C. officinalis, it is evident that it by no means agrees with it ; but on the con- trary it perfectly accords with my own of the C. macro- carpa : and of this I am the more convinced, as Mutis ne- ver fent fpecimens into Europe of the C. officinalis, it being never found at Santa F£ ; and laftly, that the fpecimen preferved in the Linnaean collection is C. macrocarpa, and not officinalis : its bark is white, and rather more bitter than that of the officinalis. Some years ago a quantity of it was imported to Madrid, and was tried by feveral phyficians, who all agreed in declaring it equal to the Peruvian. v 4. C. Caribaea. DefcribedinthePhilofophicalTranfac- tions by a Mr. Wright. 5. C. floribunda, or Quinquina Piton of Monf. Badier. The bark of thefe two fpecies is found of equal efficacy in inter- [ 14 ] intermittents. They promote a tendency to vomition, and are alfo purgative. Several perfons in England have allured me that thefe are preferred in the Weft India illands to the Peruvian. Both thefe fpecies were fent me from St. Croix. 6. C. corymbifera. This, according to Forfter, has the greateft refemblance in appearance and tafte to the officinalis or Peruvian : a defcription at large is given of it in the Nov. Adf.Upf. tom. 3. p. 176. 7. C. brachycarpa, and 8. C. lineata. Are both fo nearly allied to C. floribunda, that it is difficult to find fufficient diftindtions between them, and there is reafon to expedl the fame effect from them as from the others. Nothing but repeated experiments can determine whether the feveral kinds are equal to the Peruvian, or which may in reality deferve the preference ; but from the experiments which have already been made, it clearly appears that they are far better fubftitutes than any other Barks which have been occafionally made ufe of for that purpofe. CIN- ic/urjitr ( ,/. I) or low jcutyj . : . t 53 1 Corolla nulla. Pericarpium capfula corticata, fuberofa, quadricocca, coccis lignofis bivalvibus difpermis. Styli i ant 4. Stigmata quatuor reflexa, glandulofa, fimbriata. Semina duo in unaquaque cocca, ovata, comprefla, gla- bra, umbilico fuberofo. Mafculi flores in axillis foliorum racemis congeftis nu- merous fubfeffiles. Calyx polyphyllus, foliolis ovatis, concavis coloratis (Calyculatus fquamis ad bafin foliorum ?). Corolla nulla. Filamenta numerofa brevia : Antherae fubrotundae di- dymae. This ihrub grows about two hundred miles from the Cape, in a rocky foil, on a fingle fpot, on Wind-Hook Mountains, near Elephants’ River. A farmer lives there, who colle&s the fruit, by which 5 be t 54 ] he makes a profit of about 20 1. per annum, by felling it for the purpofe of poifoning hyaenas. The fruit is pounded into a powder, and adminiftered in the fame manner as the Nux Vomica. The powder is put into the carcafes of lambs, &c. which are laid where the hyaenas are known to come. By eating the flefh they are infallibly deftroyed. This plant flowers and bears fruit annually in the ftove of the Right Honourable the Earl of Tankerville, at Wal- ton, the only place it has yet flowered at in this country ; and I believe it is in no other collection in England except at Kew. Our figure of the female was drawn from the plant in his Lordfhip’s ftove in 179c, ; the male from a fpecimen very obligingly communicated to me by Mr. F. Maffon. FINIS. ORDER of the PLATES. Plate i. Cinchona officinalis. 2. Cinchona pubefcens. 3. Cinchona macrocarpa. 4. Cinchona caribaea. — This plate is from a fpeci- menin the Herbarium of Hen. de Ponthieu, Efq. now in my poffeffiom 5. Cinchona corymbifera. — From fpecimens and drawings in the Herbarium of Sir JofephBanks. 6. Cinchona lineata. % 7. Cinchona floribunda.— From a fpecimen in the Herbarium of Sir Jofeph Banks ; found by Mr. Fran. Maffon in St. Lucie. 8. Cinchona brachycarpa. — From a fpecimen in the Herbarium of Sir Jofeph Banks. 9. Cinchona anguftifolia. 10. Hyaenanche globofa. 11. Leaves of TecamezBark. 12. Cinchona longiflora. 13. Cinchona fpinofa. : ■' : - r :c ' ; , " '[ ‘ ' ' .?n*2. ; r.r D .0 v rv;i _i l io. _j [0 .* .[> s -no-fl si o' .»! fL; 7- ; u o ' .3 v • ' o > ' r > Xi ;' j . . : .; /. : : •f-O:. c ; wen ' ^noiTi'j:. ^ .. ..o x' : Q . * r: ‘ . . : B mo 2 ' ' ; j 7 .8.' b,' .x <* '• .p . • ' - v . > : .c : • - .7. ..’I sor 70: /: : ) , * .