Report 1055 —~|- - Tf VE :

NAVY DEPARTMENT Bad THE DAVID W. TAYLOR MODEL

WASHINGTON 7, D.C.

_BEHAVIOR OF A PROPOSED OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VESSEL IN WAVES

by

F.V. Reed

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT

August 1956

~D S

Report 1055

Na) Gy

no. 1055

BEHAVIOR OF A PROPOSED OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

VESSEL IN WAVES

by

F.V. Reed

August 1956

Report 1055

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PANES SINEUAN © uheceecessracacens creocs ce cencesocansugeasoteeoeiaccacenenctscaceee eeteneereee ee neeee ee OES

ENERO DW CaP ONessc cs) ses sercestsscesceeacaceceeteseoes coter ome ose eae so ee aaa eR aaa sane ne BoC PROUNG Resse cscs nec siek eae pars pecarrlte etcetera cee dition DD CCU

ercceececcasevece

eee rccenacccesece

er ccccesccocsrare

BUT Om ESO DDL One esse cee sacs Ave cc uses se sasss ees avectu sees susteces see eeeS aero Sn ET ee eS SRE Ea

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

a eerecstesccnseee

weerevercccccsese

ee ecererecesescce

eo vecosesccccacoce

EN eure OCeanorraphiciRescarchyVieSSOllicccccrsccsecscesesetearesseseaeenceeneenceeer cere eeseeteerereee

Figure 2 - Model of Oceanographic Research Vessel ..............:ce:cessceceresecenecenes

Figure 3 - Reduction of Speed with Constant Tow Force and

Wavelength/Waveheight | ROBY FIICG) coacosopnoscoDacbadnno0adaonocOcHNDEOSaboCOHONdOCEDCEOCONCEC

Figure 4 - Plots of Pitch and Heave versus Speed for Constant Wavelength

Figure 5 - Total Resistance of Model in Still Water .............:c:ccesssssssesseeseseeeeee

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 - Design Characteristics of the Oceanographic Research Vessel ...

MAD CEe ra DU ALTONTOMBRESUIRVOSILLES esncccrccrececerere rere reer ee eene ee

iil

eeevevavccevevece

ee erercccrcsorese

NOTATION

Maximum beam

Block coefficient

Longitudinal prismatic coefficient Coefficient of maximum sectional area Draft

Waveheight

Length of ship

Amplitude of wave

Ship speed producing resonant period of encounter Amplitude of heave

Maximum slope of wave

Wavelength

Amplitude of pitch

lV

ABSTRACT

A 5-foot model of a proposed oceanographic research vessel was tested for seaworthiness. Measurements of speed, pitch, and heave were made in a variety of wave conditions with the model heading into the waves, and qualitative observations were made in several wave conditions with the model in following seas.

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND

The broad definition of oceanography as ‘‘the science which is done at sea’’! may be taken to epitomize the notion that it is the science which results when the naval architect, the hydrodynamicist, the meteorologist, the seismologist, the biologist, and the chemist turn their attention to the study of the sea.

The diversified character of the studies means that a ship designed to conduct such research must meet, specifically or by compromise, needs which may be common to or con- flicting among the various branches. To list but a few of the items of equipment and facilities which must be available at one time or another, there are echo-sounding gear, explosives for seismological work, trawls of various kinds, snappers, dredges and corers for bottom-sampling, means of taking water samples and temperature, and laboratories and stowage facilities for

samples and specimens.

THE PROBLEM

The problem of designing a ship specifically for oceanographic research is far from simple. Should she be large like the Russian hydrographic ship WITJAS, purportedly of 5500 tons displacement,” or small like the 380-ton ATLANTIS, should she be a 12 or a 16 knot ship, and should it be attemped to provide for all types of acoustical work — these are only a few of the difficult questions that must be answered.

The per-diem cost of an oceanographic expedition is quite high and is one of the more important factors which put an upper limit on the size of the research ship. The ship must be large enough to carry sufficient personnel and equipment to make an expedition scientifically profitable, and yet her requirements as to crew, rations, and fuel—not to mention maintenance cost between cruises—must be modest.

Seaworthiness is of course a basic requirement of any vessel intended for long periods of blue-water sailing, but more is desired of the research ship than mere ability to survive heavy weather. It is desirable to reduce the sea-excited motion of the ship as muchas possible.

Excessive motion not only means misery and consequent inefficiency for personnel but adds

References are listed on page 9,

to the difficulty of handling gear and, most important of all, hampers the conduct of even the most routine scientific work. In addition it might be mentioned that for certain types of work it would be a great advantage to be able to control the heading of the ship at speeds below steerageway and even while lying to.

Precise criteria for satisfactory performance do not exist, but there is obvious benefit

in a vessel which will permit operations which have previously been prevented by a state 5 sea.

PROPOSED HULL DESIGN

A hull which has been proposed to meet the many and diverse requirements of ocean- ographic research was designed by CDR R.T. Miller, USN. The lines and outboard profile are shown in Figure 1 and several views of a 5-foot model of this vessel are shown on Figure 2.

Pertinent design particulars are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Design Characteristics of the Oceanographic Research Vessel

Length, overall, feet 181

Length, waterline, feet 170

Length between perpendiculars, feet 163

Draft (design waterline), feet 14.75 Displacement (design waterline), tons 1000 (salt water) Design speed’(still water), knots 12

Longitudinal prismatic coefficient Cp 0.53

Coefficient of maximum sectional area Cy 0.80 Block coefficient Cp 0.423 Ratio of ship length to maximum beam L/B 5.2 Ratio of maximum beam to draft B/H 2.2

The values of Cy, Cp, L/B, and B/H are typical of tugs and trawlers of the same approximate size as the proposed ship; the same is true of the deadrise.

The level of the forecastle deck terminates farther forward on the starboard side than on the port side; see Figures 2a and 2b. This affords 100 feet of clear working space on the starboard side for streaming equipment. The rubrail on the starboard side is faired into the hull down to the waterline, starting at the after end of the deck house and extending fotward some 14 feet. This arrangement preserves the function of the rubrail without offering an obstruction to gear being worked overside.

The model was ballasted to the design waterline to give a radius of gyration of 0.22L, resulting in a pitching period (determined experimentally) of 0.738 seconds or 4.3 seconds

full scale. The figure 0.22 L for the radius of gyration is somewhat smaller than that usually

———— Dk. Camber

Figure 1a - Preliminary Lines

DWL - Stbd. Only

Figure 1b - Outboard Profile (Rev. 2)

Figure 1 - Oceanographic Research Vessel

DWL

NP21-63892

Figure 2a - Starboard Side

antennae

oe 4603

NP21-63891

Figure 2b - Port Side

Figure 2c

Bow View Figure 2d - Quarter View Figure 2e - Stern View

Figure 2 - Model of Oceanographic Research Vessel

assumed in the absence of specific data for such tests at the Taylor Model Basin. The smaller value was chosen in view of the intended location of most of the massive items of equipment— the winch and stowage reel for deep-sea cable and the main propulsion plant. These, with

most of the fuel, will be located in the middle half-length of the ship.

MODEL TESTS

The tests were conducted in the 140-foot basin, using a pneumatic wavemaker and a gravity-type dynamometer.

Wavelengths corresponding to 127.5, 170, 204, and 340 feet QWik = Oss LO, 12, 20) were used, each with A/h/ values of 20, 30, and 40. The model was tested in head seas using tow forces corresponding to still-water speeds of 6 and 12 knots. Pitch, heave, and speed were measured for these conditions.

The model was also run in several sea conditions with her stern to the sea, viz.,

h =0.75L, 1.0L, 1.2L, and 2.0L, all at A/h =20. These tests were for qualitative results, no measurements of pitch and heave being taken.

The measurements of total resistance in still water were obtained incidentally in order to determine the data necessary to carry out the tests. It is considered that scaling of resis- tance data from a 5-foot model to full scale is of doubtful validity. The resistance curve is

given , Figure 5, page 9, merely to indicate the reproducibility of the data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of the tests are presented in Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2. Figure 3 shows the reduction of speed in waves; the tow force and the \/A/ ratio are constant for each curve; speed is plotted against wavelength. The magnitude of pitch and heave are shown in Figures 4a through 4d; each figure involves a single wavelength and each curve represents amplitude of motion plotted against speed for a constant ratio of A/h. The speed Vp which would pro- duce resonance in pitch—the most violent motion for a given wavelength should be expected at this speed—is shown for each wavelength.

As the curves show, reduction of speed in waves is in some cases quite drastic. How- ever, in heavy weather, ship speed is more likely to be determined by the master, in the interest of safety and comfort, rather than by lack of power. digh speed is useful mainly in traveling to and from station, so that a ship which can make 7 or 8 knots in a state 4 sea would probably be quite satisfactory from the standpoint of speed.

As to the observed pitching and heaving, they, too, are quite drastic on occasion, and are considerable throughout most of the conditions investigated. Unfortunately this behavior is characteristic of small ships in large waves. Table 2 shows that the pitch amplitude re- ferred to the maximum slope of the exciting wave (column w,,/W_,) is never larger than 1.12,

and the nondimensional heave Z,,/?,, does not exceed 1.3. In view of the fact that values of

Tow Force corresponding to 12 knots in still water

8 Tow Force corresponding to r 6 knots in still water ------ ge =| c = = = 36 Sa ae | a ‘| n N = ‘ a 4 {—\

een ise ate fh 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 Wavelength in feet

ia [Tow Force corresponding to a IL 12 knots in still water * Tow Force corresponding to Ig ail 6 knots in still water -----~ a cs = . Sel Sie a=] 2 6§———--== eS aa S =. = i \ A/h=30 n4 —. — Lee \ \ ee an ae Hoey 2 ee = = ner a Ltt —— ee eee oO 40. 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 Wavelength in feet le Tow Force corresponding to L 12 knots in still water Tow Force corresponding-to 10 F 6 knots in still water ----—— n ee er =|) 2 8 Se Sb /b=40 6S og N Qa \ Oa \ 2 ‘ nt ra \ = eb lk dae: —_— Ir Venn 7 2 - L at a —t it 4 4 1 tt (0) 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360

Wavelength in feet

Figure 3a - \/h = 20

Figure 3b -A/h = 30

Figure 3c -A/h = 40

Figure 3 - Reduction of Speed with Constant Tow Force and Wavelength/Waveheight Ratio

Length of ship equal to 170 feet.

Ym in degrees

Zm in feet

vm in degrees

Zm in feet

HE d=170' A/L=1 : al ee aa = oA/h= 20 é [real | L +/h = 30 | 6 x/h = 40 [ala 5 => ] TF ae eh jauszeseeezca ’ : pebece asi L 33 H+ X=1275 X/_= 0.75 c Se elateeale own20 | im HOU + d/n=30 me Po soe Se 18 ce j

Ship Speed in knots Figure 4a - Wavelength 127.5 Feet

»=204 Ys 12

o Wh =20 9

+ d/h =30 8 x Wh =40 ‘ Bee: 6 + 5 4 3

t—]

2!

Ht

5 4 ‘ +44 : HEE | = at! Vp 212.17 knots Sa fo) 6 8

Ship Speed in knots

Figure 4c - Wavelength 204 Feet

¥,, in degrees

2 2 < i= N Ship Speed in knots Figure 4b - Wavelength 170 Feet eee —r i £ tt SS se ae sa Le LL = es 1 1 iE all | i h=340' d/L=2 It im © \/h=20 + X/h=30 X d/h=40

4 6 8 Ship Speed in knots

Figure 4d - Wavelength 340 Feet

Figure 4 - Plots of Pitch and Heave versus Speed for Constant Wavelength

in VR=22.l knots a

iKe)

1.6 and 2 for v/o, and z,,/r,, are not unusual for other vessels, it appears that the values recorded here are by no means excessive.

Throughout the tests in head seas, the bow was dry except for an occasional bit of splashing; the stern shipped water only in the steepest waves—i.e., X/h = 20—of lengths dh =0.75L, 1.0L and 1.2L.

The model rode easily and was dry in following seas at speeds of 6 and 12 knots. When lying to, she took water at the stern in seas of } = 0.75L, A/A = 20, and also A = 1.0L, \/A = 25 and steeper, and was dry otherwise.

TABLE 2

Tabulation of Test Results

ft

127.5 6.30 | 20.24 | 2.85 : 0.284 0.321 127.5 4.31 | 29.22 | 2.07 : 0.339 0.336 Zero 127.6 3.25 | 39.20 6 0.316 0.337

127.5 | 4.30 | 29.60 0.598 6 knots 127.5 | 3.17 | 40.20 j 0.915 Stillwater 127.5 | 6.52 | 19.60 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 9.52 | 0.310 Diay

127.5 | 4.36 | 29.20 | 0.73 | 0.37 | 10.70 | 0.417 Stillwater 127.5 | 3.19 | 40.00 | 1.55 | 0.78 | 11.25 | 0.420

170 8.36 | 20.6 4.80 2.01 0.482 0.549

170 5.46 | 30.1 3.55 1.78 0.574 0.594 Zero

170 4.02 | 42.2 2.50 1.14 0.568 0.586

170 3.67 0.826 6 knots Stillwater

170 8.66 | 19.6 4.45 | 4.34 2.97 1.000 0.485 12 knots 170 5.7/8 | 29.4 4.90 5.94 1.183 0.800 Stillwater

3.21 170 | 4.26 | 39.9 | 3.02 | 2.07 | 8.74 | 0.972 | 0.670

204 | 10.20 | 20.00 | 5.40 | 3.95 0.772 | 0.600

204 6.97 | 29.30 | 4.15 | 2.87 0.824 | 0.676 | Zero

204 5.36 | 38.90 | 2.80 | 1.59 0.595 | 0.605

204 6.86 | 29.75 | 5.35 | 2.85 | 2.075 | 0.833 | 0.884 | 6 knots 204 5.13 | 39.80 | 3.67 | 2.69 | 2.860 | 1.050 | 0.812 | Stillwater 204 | 10.30 | 19.78 | 9.30 | 4.99 | 3.830 | 0.969 | 1.020

204 6.77 | 30.10 | 6.55 | 4.54 | 6.120} 1.195 | 1.095 | 22 knots

3.00

204 5.10 | 40.20 | 5.00 7.580 | 1.177 | 1.117 | Stillwater

340 16.90 | 20.05 | 9.35 | 8.78 1.040 1.065 340 11.24 | 30.20 | 5.70 | 5.25 0.934 0.956 Zero 340 8.50 | 40.00 | 4.42 | 3.70 0.871 0.982

1.063 6 knots Stillwater

340 | 17.30 | 19.67 | 8.50 | 8. 7.49 | 0.925 | 0.928 340 | 11.33 | 30.00 | 6.49 | 5. 8.96 | 0.982 | 1.083 | 12 ie 340 | 8.75 | 38.90 | 4.55 | 5. 9:78 |) 1-290) | 01983, Stillwater

0.6

fe} a

9 3B

9 w

fo) nN

Total Resistance in pounds

fo)

(0) 0.5 1.0 LS 2.0 2.5 3.0 Speed in knots

Figure 5 - Total Resistance of Model in Still Water

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the tests conducted, the model of the proposed oceanographic research vessel rode easily, was reasonably dry and showed motions which were on the average

somewhat less than those observed on models of other types of vessels.

REFERENCES

1. ‘‘Oceanographic Instrumentation,’? Edited by John D. Isaacs and Columbus O.D. Iselin, Division of Physical Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Publication No. 309 (Jun 1952).

2. Castle, .C., ‘‘USSR/iydrographic Research Ship ‘WITJAS,’’’ Intelligence steport 57-56, U.S. Navy Forces Germany (9 Feb 1956).

3. Minot, F., ‘‘Report on a Pre-Design Engineering Study of the Development of Superior Ships for Oceanographic Research,’’ Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Reference No. 53-26 (May 1958).

i my PA : vi aie nwt vom ate te Ms aid { : { F ! el, i) ; eee! | io mae eng a Wy t oi hi em vie ewe 1 th i ' \ i fs 7 | F ie ou Hi tt tii 1 pete mn bea, ; | unth, _ ar Oh i } Ubu ter eet tut Y j ili sai ben : 4 if ; pall a 7 Saha Ua ree Woe ths deen ea n | Heelan UpiateiaR ; iH sy ff et p ih ay Le ee en eae 7 H ih i‘ ies | rt j i 4 i i pee 7 t t y G3 i y \ ft i ' it Ln Was. hah igHoD | p ws ie

ey

ae as Ts His ORO eri en ey i j F -| ae ve fa fi oy am NE NOT Layne UREN Sh ERM TB UT it } : Wes oan i i i , j iN ee at ' ye %, aE i t hi j it

Copies

15 Chief, BuShips, Library (Code 312) Tech Library

Tech Asst to Chief (Code. 106) Applied Science (Code 370)

Ship Design (Code 410)

Prelim Des & Ship Pro (Code 420) Prelim Design (Code 421) Performance & Scientific (Code 436) Landing Ships & Craft (Code 529) Minesweeping (Code 530) Propellers & Shafting (Code 554)

2 Chief, BuOrd, Underwater Ordnance 1 Code Re6 1 Code Re3

2 Chief, BuAer Aero & Hydro Br (DE-3)

3 Chief, Nav Res 1 Mech Br (Code 438) 1 Naval Sci Div (Code 460) 1 Undersea Warfare Br (Code 466)

oo

ny

5 Office of Chief of Naval Operations

1 each for Op05, 0p53, 0p55, 0p342, Op55B4

1 CO, ONR, New York, N.Y.

1 CO, ONR, London, England

1 CO, ONR, Pasadena, Calif.

1 CO, ONR, San Francisco, Calif.

1 CO, ONR, Chicago, III.

1 CO, ONR, Boston, Mass.

1 CDR, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

1 CDR, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Norfolk, Va. 1 CDR, USNOL, Silver Spring, Md.

1 CO, USNUOS, Newport, R.I.

1 CDR, USNOTS, Pasadena, Calif.

1 CDR, USNOTS, Inyokern, Calif.

1 DIR, USNRL

1 Asst Sec (Res & Dev) DOD

1 DIR, Natl BuStand, Washington, D.C.

1 Tech Ref Sec, Bur Recl, Denver, Colo. 2 Document Ser Ctr, ASTIA, Dayton, Ohio 1 DIR, Armour Res Foundation, Chicago, Ill.

2 Bethlehem Steel Co., Shipbldg Div, Quincy, Mass.

2 Bath Iron Works Corp, Bath, Me.

1 DIR, Fluid Mech Lab, Univ of Calif, Berkely, Calif.

5 DIR, Scripps Inst of Oceanography, Univ of Calif, LaJolla, Calif.

1 DIR, Exper Naval Tank, Univ of Mich., Ann Arbor, Mich.

1 DIR, Midwest Res Inst. Kansas City, Mo. 2 Head, Dept, NAME, MIT, Cambridge, Mass,

NAVYT-DPPO PRNC WASH DC

Copies

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION

Newport News Shipbldg & DryDock Co., Newport News, Va. 1 Sr Nav Arch 1 Sup, Hydraulic Lab

New York Shipbldg Corp, Camden, N.J. DIR, ETT, SIT, Hoboken, N.J.

DIR, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst, Woods Hole, Mass., Attn: Messrs. A.C. Vine, R.L. Rather, Von Arx

Administrator, Webb Inst of Naval Arch, Long Island, N.Y.

Editor, Engin Index, New York, N.Y.

Librarian, Amer Soc of Mech Engr, New York, N.Y. Librarian, Amer Soc of Civil Engr, New York, N.Y. Librarian, Franklin Inst, Philadelphia, Pa.

Librarian, Inst of the Aero Sciences, New York, N.Y.

Main Library, Carnegie Inst of Tech, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Librarian, Mech Res Libr, Ill. Inst of Tech Chicago, III.

Prof. M.A. Abkowitz, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

M. Rosenblatt & Son, 253 Broadway, New York, N.Y.

Dr. A.T. Ippen, DIR, Hydro Lab, Dept of Civil & Sanitary Engin, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Prof. B.V. Korvin-Kroukovsky, SIT, Hoboken, N.J.

Dr. H. Rouse, DIR, lowa Inst of Hydraulic Res, State Univ of lowa, lowa City, la.

Dr. L.G. Straub, DIR, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Lab, Univ of Minn, Minneapolis, Minn.

Dr. V.L. Streeter, DIR, Fundamental Fluid Res, Ill. Inst of Tech, Chicago, III.

Dr. K.E. Schoenherr, College of Engin, Univ of Notre Dame, Ind.

Dr. W.1. Pierson, Jr., Dept of Meteorology, New York Univ, N.Y.

Office of Scientific Attache of Netherlands Embassy, Washington, D.C.

Admiralty Res Lab, Teddington, Middlesex, England

DIR, British Shipbldg Res Assoc, London W.1., England

Sr. M. Acevedo y Campoamor, DIR, Canal de

Experiences Hidrodinamicas, ElPardo, Madrid, Spain

CAPT R. Brard, Directeur du Bassin d” Essais des Carenes, Paris XV, France

Prof. J.K. Lunde, Skipsmodelltanken, Tyholt, Trondheim, Norway

Copies

Prof. H. Nordstrom, DIR, Statens Skeppsprovningsanstalt,

Goteborg, Sweden

Gen. Ing. U. Pugliese, Presidente, Instituto Nazionale per Studied Esperienze, di Architettura Navale, Via della Vasca Navale Rome, Italy

itil

Superintendent, Neder!andsh Scheepsbouwkundig

Proefstation, Haagsteeg 2, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Dr. H.W. Lerbs, Hamburg Model Basin, Hamburg, Germany

Dr. G.P. Weinblum, Berliner Tor 21, Hamburg, Germany

Dr. R.W.L. Gawn, Supt, Adm Exp Works, Haslar, Gosport, Hampshire, England

Mr. W.P. Walker, William Denny Bros, Ltd., Exper Tank, Dunbarton, Scotland

Dr. G. Vedeler, Managing, DIR, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, Norway

ALUSNA, London BJSM (NS) CJS

E a | WON TAT en ere shee ows ae eae? (| de # oe i beeh enpeye rad ty ail _ eee Oe ae rtaye et HARE aT

des (TH Godt Leg Ul SET ha Yn iit arieeatie @ 1 Fade be wedcdeny | Hi eT a

ia ah ood ae eed wed vey a an ay J eek: al, antek | tn

Sine eee ae Oke

a | Le ee

ee) Ae) Meret ied ch OF if Pitot amet 4 @ (oy taree Th ie 2 She fad a nip pe fae #6 fetal pat

Aa heres oe | ; Vo Pe re cman) cog AGIA

eiteasaie neal oe ere eke

eres Te ee Le BL a) a +4. wetgtiefielie Wine? ea Ae

Moe day eed emt Grek ty Fee) Aan

ah Age” oA Tape Soca) Ged ee

Te bak, idl | oA et ete

ieee ited wend OM AY canta 84 aan Ye Ae Ge feat ot he Une eat at Sen (Oo pob send oy See SB a YOR Spy 3 A lakh 8 0 Medi ve eon neg anette y Rit eG Laef ARiowett jo Fennel Fi al

ATi Re SPRATAG BYE eg

Re Laan

ie oT sore ob l ih a phady (oe HR iD

TAD Wate | wey hi tt Se if Nie

‘ aa yi pheigrnsy® imaity

Rs ee TS | ST ee ee et

0 Th. Mes 5 eaten Ady AEE Soe CaS hele) ‘isthe A a antl Pere AR chal le) AE oo iene OA gp Ny PEVIRE AM sk

fd SOMO LAA EY: We OS ee ee

tinned 2B ANON HOR TS

AYE BE CLAN Ce Reg cet aatonstntadenlek eyaed Mit, sae

ye ae Neyo a

iby ee HCO PONE RD tore bent eo

ADORE hae Haley.

disdnd Seth ar A GWE eu) » eho oh At) weigh ata at tiaeMiy .¢ i UA bd te

Mat “pret Mave’

* ager eg®. puwtf4 firearm gcse ca

15 i pox emg orl

ok ee hy aya ee cli ih

hE) A om it : ax “

(och ann the

bee ee) a

ed wha iF diel

V¥ Sot oie "aio soa 42 Joie WA) [avon] ent sa wt Sali ; ’ cont jie A prea toeok Wisi ith at Ae Pott areal On bee line 9) hu yiren oor PERE a ey a) *intily Tinie daha ay aree ,

ay fous oa

1 deter nin

neo i AR at wtag Ae OT ERA he he i eMA® RET re

don use Gy oye 4 wah eat brs

ht ade ea bi) to viii ts AN pl

te

Bee ke

(le Vb tee saith neo as eaten sn it

“A YOLepeiy ‘peey *] SSOUTYJIOMBEG “g

480} [poy — ssoulywomves — sdiyg °Z 480}

[OPOW — ssouryyomves — sdiys Aeaing *T

“A Youlepery ‘pecy “] SSOUIYWIOMBEG “g

480} [pow — SSOUIyYMOMBAS — sdIyg *Z 480}

J@POW — ssouryyiomeeg —sdiys Aeaing *T

*SveS SUIMOT[OJ UL [OPOU OY} YIM SUOTZIPUOD OABM [eIOAOS UT Ops O1OM SUOIBAIOSGO EATIEzITEND pu ‘seAeA oY} OUT SUIPeoY [pou oY) YIIM SUOT}IPUOD OAM JO AJOTIBA B UI Ope O1oM OATOY

pue ‘yoq1d ‘pesds jo syuewoemsvop “SSOUTYIIOMVOS JO} poysey

’@M [OSSOA YOIvesel O1ydvasouveso posodoad wv jo [opoul 40oj}-G y

GalaIssvTONA (ja0de1 yueudojoAep puv yoseeseyy) *sjoi ‘seyquy ‘*saty ‘jourd TT ‘Ar 9861 Suny pooy *A*a Aq ‘SHAVM NI THSSHA HOUVASHA OIHD VYNONVAOO GHSOdOd VY AO HOIAVHAE “SSOL “Hdey “uso japow 40jAD4 “4 plang

*S¥OS FUIMO]]OJ UL [OPOU OY) YIM SUOIZIPUOCD OABM [BIOAOS UT OpBll OJOM SUOT]BAIOSGO OAT]EIITVNb pus ‘soaeM oY OJUT Sutpwey JOpouw oY} YITM SUOTZIPUOD OAM JO AJOTIVA B UL OpBUl BJOM GABEY

pus ‘yoqtd ‘poeds jo squoweinsvep “SSoUuTYQIOMES IO} po}seq

@M [OSS@A yO1Bese1 OI1ydeadoures0 posodoid v jo Jopow 4Ooj-G y

GdI4ISsVTONN (qa0dea yuewdojoAop pus youvosoy) *syor ‘setquy ‘*sdTy ‘joursd TT ‘ar 986T any peoy "Ava Aq ‘SHAW NI IGSSHA HOUVASHY OIHA VAYNONVHOO GHSOdOUd V AO YOIAVHAE "GSOL “sd9y “uso Japow 40jA0] “4 plang

“A YOWEpery “peoy “] SSOUTYWOMBOG “¢

980} [SPOW = ssouryyiomvesg — sdiyg -% 489}

]2POW — SsouTYyIIOMeES — sdiys Aeaing °T

“A Yotepesy “peey “] SSOUTYIOMBEG °g

980} [2POW — SSoUuly}omBeg — sdiyg °*Z

480}

J2poW — SsouryWoMees — sdiys Aeaing *T

*SBOS GUIMO][OJ UL [epOU 94} YIM SUOIJIPUOD GABA [BIOAS UT Op O1OM SUOT}BAIOSGO OATZBII]eNb puv ‘seawM oY} OWL FuIpeoy [pour oy} YIM SUOIZIPUOD GABA JO AZOIIVA B UI OpeU O1OM BABOY

pus ‘yoqtd ‘poeds jo squowlomnsvay *SSOUTYIIOMBES 10} pezse}

2M TOSSOA YOIvesed o1ydeidouredo pesodoad wv jo japoul 400j-G y

GuI4ISSVTONN (qa0do1 yuewdojoAep puv yosvosey) *sjoa ‘sepquy ‘*sd1y ‘jourd TT ‘at 9S6T Sny -pooy *A*a Aq ‘SHAVA\ NI TASSHA HOUVASEY OIHd VADONVHOO GAHSOdOUd VW AO YOIAVHEA "GSOL “Sd2y “uIsDg japow 4ojAD) “MH plADg

*S¥OS FUIMO]OJ UI [OPOU! OY} ITA SUOTJIPUOD OABA\ [BIOASS UT OpBll GJOM SUOTIBAIOSGO OATZBIIT UND pus ‘seABM ey) OJUI SutpRey [POW OY} YIIA SUOTJIPUOD SABA JO AJQOTIBA B UI Ope BOA OABOY

pue ‘yoqtd ‘poeds jo syueweimsBe "SSOUTYIOMBES IO} pezse} BM [OSS9A yoIwesel o1ydeisouReD0 pasodoid ¥B Jo Japowl 400j-G Y

GaIHISSVTONN (qaodo1 quewdoyoaep puw yoivesey) *syor ‘seyquy ‘*sa1y ‘jour'd TT ‘Ar 9SGT Sny ‘peey *A*a Aq ‘SHAVM NI TIGSSHA HOUVASAY OIHAVYDONVAOO AHSOdOUd V AO HOIAVHASE *GGOL “Sdey “uIsDg |apow 4ojAD 4 “4 P!ADG

at oe ; My ito > ae a a

eS ee re a ee ee ep eh Pe oe”

“A yotsepeiy ‘peoy *] SSOUIYIOMBES “g

488} [OpoW — SSoulyWomMBes — sdiyg °Z 489}

J2pop| — SseuryyoMees — sdiys Aeaing *T

“A Yotlopery ‘pooy “| SSOULYJIOMBOG *g

480} [Opow — SSOUTYWIOMBEG — SdIyg *Z 489}

[@PpoW — ssouryjiomeeg — sdiys Aeaing *T

*S¥OS FUIMO][OJ UI [OPOW OY} YIM SUOIZIPUOD GABA [eIOAGS UL OPBlUl 219M SUOT}JBAIOSGO GAT}BIITENb pue ‘seAeM oY} OWT SuIpeoy JOPOU OY} YIM SUOTZIPUOD SALM Jo AZOIIVA B UI OPBUI eJOM SABO

pue ‘yojid ‘peeds jo syuowloinsve~] “SSeUTYy}IOMVES JO} pezsoy

’@M [OSS@A YoIeesel O1ydeasouves0 pesodoid wv jo Jepou 400j-g y

GuIaIssvTONN (j10de1 yuoudoyoAep pus youvesoeyy) *sjoa ‘sepqey ‘*S81j ‘yoursd TT ‘ar 986 Sny *peey *A'a Aq ‘SHAVM NI TESSHA HOUVESHY OIHA VYDONVAOO GHSOdOYd VY AO YOIAVHYE “GSOL “sdeqy “uisDg jepoy 4040} “4 plang

*S¥OS BUIMOTIOJ UL [OPOW OY) YIM SUOTIIPUOD GABA [eIOAGS UI Opell OJoM SUOTJBAIJOSGO SAI}EII[eNb pus ‘soauM oY OUT uIpeoy [@Ppoul Oy} YIM SUOTIZIpUOd eALA Jo AJOTIVA & UT EpeLUl 619M OAGEY

pus ‘yoq1d ‘poads jo syuoweinsve~p) “SSOUTYyJIOMBES JO} pozsey

BM [@SS8A YoIvosed O1ydeasouved0 pesodoid w Jo Japoul 4oo}-G y

GuIdIsSsVTIONN (j20de1 quewdojeaop pues yosvesey) *sjoi ‘seyqey ‘st ‘yourd Ty ‘ar 96 Sny *pooy "Aa Aq ‘SHAVM NI TGSSHA HOUVASHY OIHAVADONVHOO GHSOdOUd V AO YOIAVHEG “SSO “dey -uisog yapow 40/40) *4 plADG

“A yotieperg “peoy *] SSOUIYWIOMBES “¢E

480} [OPO — ssoulyyiomves — sdiyg °% se}

[9POW — SseuryoMees — sdiys Aeaing *T

“A YotIepery “peey “T SSOULYWOMBEG “g

989} [SPOW — SSoUuryWOMBEG — SdIyS *Z qs

*SBOS SUIMO][OJ UL JePOUl yy YIIM SUOTJIPUOD GABA [RIBAS UT SPBU S1aM SUOTJVAIOSGO eATZe}ITeNb pus ‘seaeM oy} OJUT SuIpesy JOpow ey) YIM SUOTIIPUOD BALM JO AJOTIVA B UL OpBUl oJoM GABSY

pus ‘yoqztd ‘poeds jo squewioinseep| “SSOUTYIIOMVES JO} pozsey

@M [O@SS8A Yolvesel o1ydevasoureoo pesodoad ve jo jepoul 400j-g y

GdI4ISSVTONNA (qa0do1 quewdoyoaep pue yosvosoy) *sjo ‘seyqey ‘*sS1y ‘jourd Tr ‘ar 9S6T Sny -pooy “Ava Aq ‘SHAVM NI IGSSHA HOUVASAY OIHAVADONVAOO GHSOdOUd V AO YOIAVHAG "SSOL “Wdey “ursog japow 40jAD] + plang

*SvoS SUIMOT[OJ Ul [OPOUl EY} YIM SUOTPIPUOD SABA [BIOASS UT Opwll E1OM SUOTIBAIOSGO OATZBIITeNb pus ‘SeaBA oy OJUT SuIpBey [OPOU OY} YIIA SUOTJIPUOD GALA JO AZAIIBA B UL OPEL B18A\ BABY

pus ‘yoqtd ‘poads jo syuewioinsBep *SSEUTYIOMBES JO} pezse} BM [OSSOA YorBasel O1ydvisouBeD0 pesodoid ¥B Jo Japoul 400}-G V

GdIdISSVTONN (q10dea quewdoyoAep pus yousosey) *syoi ‘seyqe) ‘*sslj ‘your d TT ‘Ar 9S6T Sny *peoy “Aa Aq ‘SHAW NI THSSGA HOUVASAY OIHAVYDONVAOO GHSOdOUd V AO YOIAVHE "COL “sdey “wsog japow 40jA04 *4 plang