THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY. 63%. Il 6b we. 166-136 ra ied aay a x tes wc? &. 4 ae : bs sae LIBF 'ARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS NON CIRCULATING CHECK FOR UNBOUND CIRCULATING COPY tit UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Agricultural Experiment Station BULLETIN No. 179 A BIOCHEMICAL STUDY OF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES By ALBERT L. WHITING URBANA, ILLINOIS, MARCH, 1915 CONTENTS OF BULLETIN No. 179 PAGE EN TRODUCREON 2. 5 tiieccvecorarnicrererscersyss yew ssi toes oS oie oe) tele G biote ages esate. alae 471 EME CLC AM yori cise co sarel oe sieteroneisisleisiwlarsuals racer ole teaieta ale aeieioate aieue tion srwelese 472 ES TOT OGG AT arte, feats cee asaye eta eee aie tateiel anede ard cssar anchors angi sid alan bun okestaccretehova stays Hiete 475 HE CEL ON tere occ faus cocci cresobener oes aie osua ote csalsasrageer tata aT ere Cie orotate tote sta sr eraie 476 Inoculation as It Occurs Under Field Conditions.....................4. 480 GOW th «OL tH 7 IN OCUIO 5 :c;ccratesn sc siatens fevsie erotic Hel cncresaher ot ycicn aeatenst casts tome sarejanete 481 BACT WRIOGOGICAUH gos cscvescrachaicieos aisraieieteaisloteas(orcts or aici cicereiasa ehepesaratereie ease 482 Bacillus PAdicieola se scsicscpsvtisis aks Siepst ane ios cosets Mees aieased e eine Oe Maneiareiaieiee See 483 Growth: and; Endurancesof B. tadicicolay ...c2.2).cnsis ace cide oer nas steers wisuere 484 EGOUDULGY§ OL bose TAG CLCOLA ic cise ror ct a fal orale oi stay oh ol cxs say od eet one MopoR ee oeie pees io oneal oe pone 484 ENZVINO- ETOCUCLLONT DY. 5s -TACICLCOlA rs crore acai foyeqous ues als elores toys ysies ci jaws 485 Slime:Production.by Bb: Tadicicolans seas cies prise cette reir ereie a een eioneele 486 Isolation of B. radicicola..... RS issllhy ganenis sfevedeva Neue. Oievere ismeuee eres raiers Tee ee acetate te 486 Dissemination: Of: Bi TAAICICOL A... 5 s0.ete 5 iiss wsle ce shed &. oveesiatoh suave tevin ay eueders eieiais ace 486 Fixation of Nitrogen Without the Legume Plant...................... 487 SACEONOLOS ters ciersioys erotes otonsle stars Searetate wie cto tere nts cots tareratintan spayarel sree Se foratalavanctarsie ts 487 THEORIES OF ASSIMILATION, FIXATION, AND IMMUNITY........ 488 Theories of: Assimilation: by. the’ Plant ss.5c25 3)2)2 2s ssisrs 34 se -gisac epee cleo 488 Theories Regarding the Chemical Phenomena of Fixation.............. 489 PHEOLICS OL -LINMUNI GY! oor: sia accinis cate sec eter erate occceta oiaiaie “slonef oholegsna? ciel sneve.s ener et= 492 PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH REGARD TO LEGUME TENTEXGATISTIOUNG oie cost. Saris eu'es octets vate aitas oes aa o5/ctieca; cee anelevaliel® aber ora tahay acsioter netetsrars 493 Mattia (Sym Diss ey j cise ces tesco css ohecste lea siacs oie te vero carte a etetaieee ie atele eras etoile eeeetens 493 Amount of Nitrogen Fixed per Acre per Year.................ccceees 495 Value of Legumes as Nitrogen Retainers. ...............cccceeccecees 496 Cross! INOCULATION. (<:s12:015 ote aieierei se t)6 aie wheres DCR ig Meek wae 497 Associative Growth of Legumes and Non-Legumes..................... 498 RTS MEL CAUSA prcecirav stot scck at yaa etevesto Suz ie ator tan cleuct el wistera tata iets laierskeng stabs Biacere otaenies esters 499 ee LEN EAE rs oO cre a ata aia ceiy 8 Seat aha ae lata tn aigia se eratae alee neikes eae covlaly aay 503 PlanGoLolnvesti ations sfsiiva 7 foysioie ts (ere ie stare ete eis “elocelslaveie releis e/ee aera ateteeenersts 503 Part I: SrupIES TO DETERMINE THRU WHICH ORGANS LEGUMES OBTAIN ‘ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN 9. cic cicislsisicls ores Gristarcisiafe sie alar sveveicitraruw isis cise iets 503 General ‘Plan: of “Experiments «ffir tied cite wee oils MS chess eae 505 EXP OVUM Ont vhosvececens jerevote w claters cies siete ape rare ale Oretor etal wiatavaeiatecia atte ts 507 PSXPOELM OME HE licsrersyeiei cs ovetsyepcin menparstetnia whe ceiesaie ate ate feceyelele wists ads lores iocels 507 Dab giv sire aaa lB ESS Aaa erro ioe sree Si ben hearye seis Tore Co poe CP eee 509 ER DGTaOWNe: V6 0555584 5 as ops 45h oe 4S ER EN RAS Saws aS 514 Experiment by OnsOwitaenl....vaiccoiss vicki sd ae beens slesien ses 519 General Consideration of Gas Experiments.................... 521 Practical Application Of Tosulte. .i0o.i <. bs cs cnet cto sdacvces 522 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY JUL 9 - 1915 Be Part II: RELATIVE PERCENTAGES OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS IN THE VARIOUS PARTS OF THE SOYBEAN AND COWPEA AT DEFINITE PERIODS OP AMROWTE oes ei cn cs ncce sho 0 ue pp mMMEOR eS oss 6 cate 5 ¢e- sue 522 Methods Employed in the Growth and Preparation of Samples. .523 Analytical Methods: «os... ..scc « seeeeemetelaleare ois kale sia-aseveio eles 525 Discussion of Some of the Methods Used................0-6- 527 Qualitative Testa 2 scsi. occu coke eee ee ta eaten sane min eee 527 Series 100 (Soybeans)... 6. cs sces dav c wae cee wale ume perma 528 Series 500 (Soybeans)... ... oo. ess cele a Seles a) q alate eae 532 Series: 700: (Soybeans) sii. v..ce sdccrerecal titlohe rete leceheeoeeeremaiateie seers 533 Series 600. (Cowpeas) ....5 6.20 ter cee bee pn ale ener atanions 536 Discussion Of “Tables s.c:s sia 5scccssce alate gree ase nclets) a ace eae eae 537 CONCLUSIONS 54:4 aiew one e waareea wees ceo eae wea ear * 541 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE PAGE I.—Nodules of Robina Type on Roots of Soybeans................-4.- 477 II.—Nodules of Lupinus Type on Roots of Lupine Seedlings............ 478 III.—Nodules of Robina Type on (A) Red Clover; (B) Vetch; (C) Sweet Clover. cts setsraie sie sip she Ee ee ee Ce eR eee 479 IV.—Cowpea Seedlings in Preparation for Gas Experiments............. 504 V.—Experiment II: Cowpeas at Harvest (37 Days)................6- 506 VI.—Experiment II: Plants Grown in Air and in CO,+0............. 508 VII.—Experiment III: At Beginning and 10 Days Later................ 510 VIII.—Experiment III: 52 Days from Beginning and at Harvest (83 DPV) Biase rciccets tevale leeciatace tinier ttateretaleae Goer oteoeteer a eimetele itoeiare eis totetee 511 IX.—Experiment III: Roots from Plants Grown in CO, + O and in Air. .513 X.—Experiment IV: At Beginning and 16 Days Later............... 515 XI.—Experiment IV: 41 and 59 Days from Beginning................ 516 XII.—Experiment IV: At Harvest (95 Days)............cc cece eee ewes 517 XITI.—Experiment IV: Roots from Plants Grown in CO,+O and in Be OO el Oar te alanine ane PTC IOC OR ee ET IT 518 XIV.—Typical Jar of Five Cowpeas Being Grown for Samples............ 523 XV.—Graph Showing Soluble and Insoluble Nitrogen in Series 100........ 531 XVI.—Graph Showing Soluble and Insoluble Nitrogen in Series 700 and 500.535 XVII.—Graph Showing Soluble and Insoluble Nitrogen in Series 600........ 538 FIGURE 1.—Root hair of common pea, showing infecting strand...................- 476 2.—Root cell, showing infecting strand passing thru it and the formation Ge INOOUAG 5 52a isis ss ids sin bbe ODE OT AT VME aN oes 6 Whe RO RENE 476 3.—Young nodule magnified, showing affected root hair and same root hair more. Dighly magnified . 53). ea gasn< os.os de gobs ales's.a d's ote ee es 480 4.—Young nodule, showing the beginning of the differentiation of its tissues. .482 5.—B. radicicola, showing shape and flagella.................ceeeceeseees 483 6.—Bacteroids, showing shape, and oceurrence of vacuoles...............++: 488 A BIOCHEMICAL STUDY OF NITROGEN | IN CERTAIN LEGUMES! By ALBERT L. WHITING, AssociaTE 1n Sort BioLtocy INTRODUCTION The investigations considered in this publication bear on the biochemical nature of the element nitrogen, especially as concerns its fixation and assimilation thru the symbiotic relationship of Bacillus radicicola and certain members of the botanical family known as Leguminosae. The sourees of the element nitrogen available for agricultural purposes are numerous. Of these the atmosphere is by far the most important and most extensive. Above each acre of the earth’s surface there are about 69 million pounds of atmospheric nitrogen, and science has shown that by thoroly scientific systems of management this nitrogen may be appropriated for soil improvement at a minimum expense. By growing legumes, atmospheric nitrogen may be obtained at a low cost, often at no net cost, for most agricultural leguminous crops are worth growing for feed or seed alone. In commercial fer- tilizing materials, nitrogen costs from fifteen to twenty cents per pound, an amount from two to five times greater than that expended for any of the other essential elements of plant food. It is of passing interest to note how greatly disproportionate the cost values of these elements are to the relative supplies, when the nitrogen in the air is considered. The United States spends annually, abroad, over 32 million dol- lars in the purchase of combined nitrogen for use in various opera- tions, agricultural and otherwise.? Of this amount 1614 million dol- lars are expended for the purchase of sodium nitrate, which is the Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Illi- nois in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of phi- losophy, June, 1912. Revised to date of issuance. *Norton: Special Agent Series, Dept. of Commerce and Labor, Bur. of Manfr., No. 52, 9-11. 471 472 BULLETIN No. 179 [ March, most important commercial form of inorganic nitrogen. The present world supply of this salt is estimated at 454,576,200,000 pounds. How insufficient this supply is, when measured by crop require- ments, may be realized from the fact that the following nine important crops of the United States,—corn, wheat, oats, barley, rye, potatoes, hay, cotton, and tobacco, in the year 1910, required for their growth 11,500,000,000 pounds of nitrogen.? If sodium nitrate were used for growing these crops at the rate stated above, the supply would be ex- hausted in about six years. On the other hand, the nitrogen above only one square mile, weighing 20 million tons, would be sufficient to supply what the entire world, at its present rate of consumption, would require for the next fifty years. The nitrogen above four acres would furnish more than the actual yearly consumption of commercial nitrogen in the entire United States. The wonderful possibilities presented by such an extensive source of plant food, and the fact that over 100 million dollars are invested in commercial fertilizers each year in the United States, a large part of which is wasted or uselessly applied, together with the great natural losses of nitrogen that occur, tend to emphasize greatly the need of a proper utilization of this unlimited reserve supply. Further, it is well recognized that the maintenance of the nitrogen supply is the greatest of our soil problems. Nitrogen cannot be purchased on the market at a price that will permit its extensive application in growing the im- portant crops of the United States. There is only one logical and in- exhaustible source of nitrogen for the world to utilize in the produc- tion of crops. That source is the atmosphere, from which nitrogen is most economically and easily secured as a result of the symbiotic relationship between B. radicicola and leguminous plants. HISTORICAL For several centuries certain plants of the Leguminosae have been used as soil improvers. A few of the more important references to their uses are considered here. In Roman literature, among the works of Columella,* mention is made of the Roman farmers regarding beans as possessing the prop- erty of enriching the soil, and atténtion is also called to the practice of plowing under lupines. Alfalfa and vetches were observed to pro- duce similar results to those of lupines and beans. Like notations *Review of Reviews, April, 1910. “Yields taken from U. S. Yearbook, 1910. For calculations see Hopkins’ ‘*Soil Fertility and Permanent Agriculture’’ (1910), 154; also 603-604. *Norton: Special Agent Series, Dept. of Commerce and Labor, Bur. of Manfr., No. 52, 9-11. *Marshall: Microbiology (1911), 273. 1916] A BIocHEMICAL Srupy oF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES 473 may be found among the writings of Thaer and Walz. Gasparin? constantly calls attention to the power of leguminous plants to add nitrogen to the soil. Jethro Tull? wrote concerning the efficiency of legumes in restoring depleted soils, mentioning especially sanfoin and alfalfa. It may be noted here that Hellriegel, who later was most promi- nent in the discovery of the relation existing between legumes and bacteria, wrote in 1863 as follows: ‘‘Clover plants may develop nor- mally and completely in mere sand to which the necessary mineral constituents of plant food have been added in assimilable forms, even when this soil contains no trace of any compound of nitrogen or of organic matter.’’ Schultz-Lupitz* in 1881 reported results that were of both chemi- eal and practical significance. After growing lupines for fifteen con- secutive times on a sandy soil, without the application of nitrogenous materials, he observed that the yields did not diminish; and when he grew cereals on the same land after the lupines, he found that the yields of the grains were two and three times the yields where no lupines had been grown. Analyses of the soils at the end of this time showed that where the lupines had been grown, the nitrogen content of the surface six inches had increased by .06 percent. Frank® veri- fied these results with twenty years of lupine culture on the same fields. About this time a great deal of interest centered on pot-culture experiments with legumes. Many physiologists and chemists worked on the problem of nitrogen collection by legumes. Prominent among these were the scientists Boussingault,® and Lawes, Gilbert, and Pugh,’ who, owing to their great accuracy, sacrificed the possibility of becom- ing the discoverers of this important relationship. In their great care, they destroyed the vital agency (B. radicicola) necessary for the ac- complishment of this symbiotic fixation. Later, in 1886, Hellriegel and his co-worker Wilfarth® made the classical discovery that legumes obtain atmospheric nitrogen thru the association of microdrganisms living in the nodules. In a preliminary report read before a section of scientists assembled on September 20, 1886, at Berlin, Hellriegel announced his findings; and in a more com- ‘Storer: Agriculture (1906), 2, 97. *Tbid. ‘Lipman: Bacteria in Relation to Country Life (1908), 206. “Schultz-Lupitz: Landw. Jahrb. (1881), 10, 777. ‘Frank: Landw. Jahrb. (1888), 17, 501. *Boussingault: Ann. Sci. Agron. (1909), 26, Ser. 3, 4, 102-130. "Lawes, Gilbert, and Pugh: Rothamsted Experiments (1905), 6-7. *Hellriegel and Wilfarth: Tagblatt d. Naturforscher Versamml. z. Berlin (1886), 290. 474 BULLETIN No. 179 [ March, plete account rendered two years later, he made known to the world his researches. These are summarized as follows:! 1. The legumes differ fundamentally from the grains in their nutrition with respect to nitrogen. 2. The grains (Gramineae) can satisfy their nitrogen need only by means of assimilable combinations existing in the soil, and their development is always in direct proportion to the provision of nitrogen which the soil places at their disposal. 3. Outside the nitrogen of the soil, the legumes have at their service a second source from which they can draw in most abundant manner all the nitrogen which their nutrition demands to complete that lack when the first source is in- sufficient. 4. That second source is the free nitrogen—the elemen- tary nitrogen of the atmosphere which is furnished to them. 5. The legumes do not possess by themselves the faculty of assimilating the free nitrogen from the air; it is ab- solutely necessary that the vital action of microdrganisms of © the soil come to their aid in order to attain this result. 6. In order that the nitrogen of the air can be made to serve the nutrition of the legumes, the sole presence of lower organisms in the soil is not sufficient; it is still necessary that certain among them enter into a symbiotic relationship with the plants. 7. The nodules? of the roots must not be considered as simple reservoirs of albuminoid substances; their relation to the assimilation of free nitrogen is that of cause to effect. Schloesing and Laurent? after growing legumes in a confined at- mosphere, gave out the following direct evidence of the fixation of at- mospherie nitrogen. Atmospheric nitrogen introduced into culture. vessel, i...0 6600555 oiler are os 2681.2 cem. Atmospheric nitrogen withdrawn.............. 2653.1 ecm Amount of nitrogen assimilated.............. 28.1 cem. (=36.5 mg.) Nitrogen in the soil and crop...............-. 73.2 mg. Nitrogen in the soil and seed................ 32.6 mg. Nitrogen aasimilated: < scs'ssus ss Giwedien ko b6 ee 40.6 mg. *Hellriegel and Wilfarth: Beil. Zert. d. Verins. fiir die Rubenzucker in- oan a Berlin, Nov., 1888; or Lafar Handbuch der technischen Mykologie (1904- 06), 3, 31. *Nodules substituted for tubercles. *Schloesing and Laurent: Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (1890), 111, 750; (1892) 115, 659, 732. 1915] A BrocHEMIcAL Stupy oF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES 475 In addition to the scientists mentioned above, Atwater and Woods, Berthelot, Miintz, Ville, Mazé, Dehérain, Frank, Hartig, Nobbe, Hilt- ner, Warrington, Hopkins, and many others have done much careful work in solving the problem and applying the truths discovered. BIOLOGICAL Nodules,! which are the visible manifestations of infection, were observed upon the roots of legumes by Malphighi? as early as 1687. The investigators of those times believed that the nodules were the re- sult of pathological processes,—that they were lumps, knobs, warts, and even galls. In 1853 the modern conception of the nodule as a nor- mal growth on the legume plant was established by lL. C. Treviranus.® Various theories have been proposed as to the function of these peculiar outgrowths, some advancing the idea that they were storage reservoirs or stimuli whereby the plants obtained nitrogen from the atmosphere thru their leaves. Recently Jost* has called them ‘‘bac- terium galls,’’ local hypertrophies not dissimilar to those sometimes caused by animal life. An astonishing conception has crept into the minds of the authors of certain general textbooks on bacteriology and plant physiology that nodules are abnormal growths and that their re- lationship to plants is either wholly or partially parasitic. It seems preferable, even to those familiar with the limitations of the theory, to deseribe this relationship as a normal condition and a true mutual symbiosis. That the formation of these nodules is due to external infection was definitely shown in 1887 by Marshall Ward,5 who was able to inocu- late the roots of young legumes by placing them in contact with old nodules. In Germany the first attempts to grow soybeans (Glycine hispida) in the botanical gardens resulted in failure, and it was not until soil from the natural habitat of that plant was imported for inoculation that soybeans were grown successfully.6 The history of the introduction of alfalfa culture in the states of Kansas and Illinois exemplifies in a large way this need of inoculation. From this experi- ence developed the soil-transfer method and the glue method’ of inocu- lation, both of which are recogmzed today as superior to the use of so- called commercial cultures. *Nodules are recognized on the following non-leguminous plants: alders (Alnus glutinosa), silverberry (Eleagnus), sweet gale (Myrica Gale), sago palm, an evergreen, (Podocarpineae), eycads (Cycacadeae), birthwort (Aristolociaceae). Nitrogen-fixing bacteria resembling B. radicicola have been found in the alder, silverberry, sweet gale, and five varieties of podocarpus. *Malphighi: Op. (1687), 2, 126, Leiden. *Treviranus: Bot. Ztg. (1853), 11, 393. ‘Jost: Plant Physiology (Gibson 1907), 237. *Ward: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London (1887), 178, 139. *Soil inoculation experiments were instituted as early as 1887 at the Moor Culture Experiment Station, Bremen, Germany. Til. Agr. Exp. Sta. Buls. 76, 94. 476 BULLETIN No. 179 { March, Two types of nodules have been recognized by Tschirch ;! Lupinus (lupine) represents one type and Robina (locust) the other. As may be seen by reference to Plates I and II, they differ in morphological appearance. The Lupinus type involves a swelling of the central root cylinders themselves, while in the Robina type only the epidermal and the endodermal tissues seem to enlarge. According to Tschirch, the nodules of lupines alone are of the first type, mene those of all other legumes belong to the second. The figures in Plate III are sufficient to illustrate the most com- mon shapes of the Robina type. The shape varies with the different species of legumes, and to a certain extent with the individuals on the same legume plant. In the experimental work reported in this publi- cation, over twenty thousand nodules were examined closely, and it was not uncommon to find on the same plant notable variations due to external obstructions to growth. INFECTION The artificial inoculation of a plant is easily accomplished by con- tact. If the epidermis of the root is wounded and the infecting or- ganism (B. radicicola) brought into contact with the wound, nodules Fig. 1—Root hair of com- Fig. 2.—Root cell, showing in- mon pea (Pisum sati- fecting strand passing thru it vum), showing infecting and the formation of lamellae strand (x300) (After (x650) (After Prazmowski) Prazmowski) *Tschirch: Ber. deut. Bot, Gesell. (1887), 5, 58. 1915] A BiocHEMICAL Stupy oF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES 477 PLATE I.—NopULES OF ROBINA TYPE ON Roots or SOYBEANS (Enlarged) ‘ 478 BuuLeTin No. 179 . [March, Puate II.—NopuLes or LuPINus Type oN Roots or LUPINE SEEDLINGS (After A. Meyer) A BIOCHEMICAL Stupy oF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES 479 1915] (oq1p snyoqyayy ) UAAOTO LAIMG (0) £ (vans 01014) HOLTA (q) f (asuaznid wnyofisy) ATAOTO aay (VW) NO FdAJ, VNIGOY O STTAGON— re) a Vv TIl GLV1Ig 480 BuLueTIn No. 179 [ March, result. Inoculation in pot cultures is attained by placing an infusion on the seed or in the medium. A similar method is successful with water cultures. INOCULATION AS It Occurs UNDER FreLp ConpDITIONS Studies of inoculation as it occurs in the field show the following generally accepted phenomena: As the tip of the root hair of the legume pushes itself out into the soil, it chances to come into intimate contact with the organism B. radicicola. Some scientists have exploited the view that the organ- ism is attracted to the plant by chemotaxis, believing that the plant excretes a substance, probably a carbohydrate, which diffuses into the soil solution and attracts the motile organism. While it has been rather definitely shown that this organism progresses in the soil at a rapid rate, nevertheless the number of root hairs ~ in- fected! is too small. to lend support to a chemotactic theory. However the case may be, the organisms clus- ter at the tip of the hair and by means of an enzyme (or otherwise). rapidly dis- solve the cellulose of the cell wall, thus enabling the organism to enter the root hair. As a result, there is a decided bending of the tip, causing it to resemble a shepherd’s crook. This was early observed as a sign of complete infection. It is claimed that other root hairs which form after infection are immune to - the attack of other legumi- nous bacteria.” Fig. 3.—Young nodule magnified, showing af- The organisms, by rapid fected root hair and same root hair more Broint d wth d-: highly magnified (After Atkinson) Ivision and growth, ad- vance thru the center of the infected root hair. Prazmowski® found organisms in the cell *Pierce, G. J.: Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci. II, No. 10 (1902), 295-328. Pierce found the proportion with bur clover to be 1: 1000. *Fred: Vir. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt. 1909-10, 123-125. *Prazmowski: Landw. Vers. Stat. (1890), 37, 160-238. 1915] A BIocHEMICAL Stupy oF NITROGEN IN CERTAIN LEGUMES 481 sap and even in the epidermis only two days after inoculation. In this advance an infection strand (Infektion-schlauche) is formed, which consists of gelatinous material, and in the earlier stages of de- velopment this strand may be traced from the root hair into the inner tissue of the root and from cell to cell thruout the nodule. This infect- ing strand is not supposed to constitute a portion of the living tissue, nor is it a well-defined tube; but, as Fred has recently shown, it con- sists of a large number of zoogloea occurring adjacent to one another, in which separate bacteria can be distinguished. The infecting strand branches profusely, and it was this habit of growth which caused the early investigators to consider it the mycelium of a fungous growth. GRowTH OF THE NODULE The presence of B. radicicola in the tissues of the root causes a rapid cell division in the pericyecle. These cells become larger and contain more protoplasm than the surrounding cells, and as growth takes place, the cortical parenchyma and epidermis are forced out- ward, thus forming a nodule. The growth of the nodule is apical. The various tissues common to the plant are present (see Fig. 4). In the central portion of the nodule is the so-called bacteroidal tissue, which is ochre, flesh, or gray in color, according to the age of the nodule, and in this portion the infecting strand (Infektion-schlauche) is distin- guished in the young nodule. It ramifies thruout the cells, causing those which it enters to lose their power of cell division but not of growth. Later, or in older nodules, the infecting strand is not visible, and the bacteroidal tissue loses its firmness. At the period when seed formation is at its height, most of the nodules are soft, and the inter- nal tissues slough off, leaving the more resistant epidermal tissue as a mere shell, which later decays. The endurance of the nodule depends upon several factors,—chiefly, however, upon the kind of legume plant on which it is produced and the need of nitrogen by that plant. Pierce! considers the nodules as originating endogenously from the same layer of cells as the lateral roots, and as being morphologi- cally similar to them ; however, as the lateral roots rupture the epider- mis, the above statement is not entirely in accord with what actually takes place. The nodules are largest and most numerous where aeration is best in the soil. In saturated soils they occur at the surface and are often found colored green, very similar to sunburned potatoes. Nodules form in solutions, and exceptionally well in certain nutrient solutions. Several interesting instances have been brought to the attention of the Experiment Station, in which the observers believed that the nodules *Pierce, G. J.: Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci. II, No. 10 (1902), 295-328, 482 : BuLuEeTIN No. 179 [ March, had grown above the ground. These peculiarities were undoubtedly caused by unobserved physical conditions occurring at the time of in- fection or afterward. EOD ae ae eS re = na cc wi = =z > r To) a Lor f=] oo) = co BULLETIN. URBANA 166-181 1914-15