s-prreecososenereeniniets page eros ang 4 ornne Sprormnsiasereren ee Sean PE ecrciaheeveyer perenne COUSee eee caseennesnrnrennrersrem eels a Ape Lapabevorateforsbotnrnt Tere eis aisee, Seosese tybpteertoet serene goo nes Say vm hy geen open eoabeon os Bh “ii ie SR Re Me da ee ae OC RS =. — . ; LA} i i r : ; . < ~) ; ake Fi ‘ 4 — 2 4 : at Fa 4 we \ d a > - iy ' i r 7 ‘ i - ee att, al Pee sy" ; By, ae, cs yp dle ¥ Ba aE ' M ; ¢ - » ’ , « a“ , Po ce , oa ae i , il ~ \ Q ¢ , = =, - - ens oe y ; : : ee 7 ‘ : 7 . | (as nie | | Pad .* * : g | “~ ra Cc Fe | The Birds of Washington Of this work in all its editions 1250 copies have been printed and the plates destroyed. Of the British Columbia Edition 55 sets have been printed and bound, of which this copy is No. Bis. “rea Raat NT Or THE 872 SPRLAAM FOUND IN THE STATE 7 ¢ Sane be id ae co WILLIAM LEON DAWSON, A. M.,.B. D., ot Seurtle ka AUTHOR OF “THE BIRDS OF OHIO" onan ei ASSIA DES ‘ ae JOHN HOOPER BOWLES, of Tacoma : aes ; ILLUSTRATED By MORE THAN (300 ORIGINAL Sakaaues ‘OF BIRDS IN LIFE, NESTS, < EGGS, AND FAVORITE. HAUNTS, | PROM PHOTOG SHS RY THE ; j UTHOR AND “OTHERS <2 WITH SUPPLEMENTARY MATTER #Y # c ; ~ PRINTED ONLY OR ADVANER “ft cole. Fy Toeaee | SEATTLY ” THE OCCIDENTAL PUBLISHING (© 4 1s ALE PONTE RESERVED xX — 62 Ww2D2/ 103 v.| THE BIRDS OF WASHINGTON Rv ’ A COMPLETE, SCIENTIFIC AND POBULAR ACCOUNT OF THE 372 SPECIES ©F BIRDS FOUND IN THE STATE BY WILLIAM LEON DAWSON, A.M., B. D., of Seattle AUTHOR OF “THE BIRDS OF OHIO" ASSISTED BY JOHN HOOPER BOWLES, of Tacoma ILLUSTRATED BY MORE THAN 300 ORIGINAL HALF-TONES OF BIRDS IN LIFE, NESTS, EGGS, AND FAVORITE HAUNTS, FROM PHOTOGRAPHS BY THE AUTHOR AND OTHERS. TOGETHER WITH 40 DRAWINGS IN THE TEXT AND A SERIES OF FULL-PAGE COLOR-PLATES. BY ALLAN BROOKS BRITISH COLUMBIA EDITION WITH SUPPLEMENTARY MATTER BY ALLAN BROOKS. PRINTED ONLY FOR ADVANCE SUBSCRIBERS. VOLUME I SEATTLE THE OCCIDENTAL, PUBLISHING CO; 1909 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyricut, 1909, ax Witiam Leon Dawson Saobin ae ee Composition and Presswork by The New Franklin Printing Company. Binding by The Ruggles-Gale Company, To the MWembers of the Caurinus Club, in grateful recognition of their friendly services, and in expectation that under their leadership the interests of ornithology will prosper in the Pacific Northwest, this work is respectfully Dedicated EXPLANATORY. TABLE OF COMPARISONS. INCHES. ERC EMGIZCterewetee tap Resetens ais fehcray sisi cysteteletrus eheres aveverah easiers Length up to 5.00 Miah le retsiz etter ste scrstacrsyci ie Sictetn cn Sesteecnne at shel Os) arseeeS sacs Boers) esc 5-00- 6.00 ALTO WASIZO ur aeyaueteter ars ol) teersva eames a= eaccomevet © Sieve ay Bye 6.00- 7.50 he wi ep SIZO are ein esses taney Ne eet cla ncciaieree nis sere 7.50- 9.00 ING) s}tal SAO poaennooee Regen r/o ae FO re ee 9.00-12.00 Witte dawkasize, Meall’sizes Mernusize-e 4... cems- saa. esc 12.00-16.00 (WO WASIZE Aye Sar cite ciel oe hse Sars Raveyh eke Pieh sian Siena, svemeiemaenehe 16.00-22.00 Gull®siz eae Bran tUsiZesciertacts ape crlonerstclels cites ai eave ous nities 22.00-30.00 Biaclersizem GOOSCISIZ Ome eter cei a ee eee tee scree Se 30.00-42.00 (STEWS. 3 6 Bin ob 60.0 SRR RE OO ae OD ote erie aeaorecic 42.00 and upward Measurements are given in inches and hundredths and in millimeters, the latter enclosed in parentheses. KEY OF ABBREVIATIONS. References under Authorities are to faunal lists, as follows: TD Townsend, Catalog of Birds, Narrative, 1839, pp. 331-336. C&S. Cooper and Suckley, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv., Vol. XII., pt. IL., 1860, pp. 140-287. EAS Lawrence, Birds of Gray’s Harbor, Auk, Jan. 1892, pp. 30-47. L2. Lawrence, Further Notes on Birds of Gray’s Harbor, Auk, Oct. 1892, pp. 352-357. Rh. Rhoads, Birds Observed in B. C. and Wash., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1893, pp. 21-65. (Only records referring explicitly to Washington are noted.) Dr. Dawson, Birds of Okanogan County, Auk, Apr. 1897, pp. 168-182. se Snyder, Notes on a Few Species, Auk, July 1900, pp. 242-245. Kb. Kobbé, Birds of Cape Disappointment, Auk, Oct. 1900, pp. 349-358. Ra. Rathbun, Land Birds of Seattle, Auk, Apr. 1902, pp. 131-I4T. D2. Dawson, Birds of Yakima County, Wilson Bulletin, June 1902, pp. 50-67. Sst. Snodgrass, Land Birds from Central Wash., Auk, Apr. 1903, pp. 202-200. Ss2. Snodgrass, Land Birds Central and Southeastern Wash., Auk, Apr. 1904, pp. 223- 233. Kk. Keck, Birds of Olympia, Wilson Bulletin, June 1904, pp. 33-37. lke Johnson, Birds of Cheney, Condor, Jan. 1906, pp. 25-28. B. Bowles, Birds of Tacoma, Auk, Apr. 1906, pp. 138-148. E. Edson, Birds of Bellingham Bay Region, Auk, Oct. 1908, pp. 425-4309. For fuller account of these lists see Bibliography in Vol. II. References under Specimens are to collections, as follows: U. of W. University of Washington Collection; (U. of W.) indicates lack of locality data. In) Pullman (State College) Collection. P!. indicates local specimen. Prov. Collection Provincial Museum, Victoria, B. C. : Collection C. W. & J. H. Bowles. Only Washington specimens are listed. (ep Cantwell Collection. BN. Collection Bellingham Norma! School. iD Collection J. M. Edson. PREEACE: Love of the birds is a natural passion and one which requires neither analysis nor defense. ‘The birds live, we live; and life is sufficient answer unto life. But humanity, unfortunately, has had until recently other less justifiable interests—that of fighting pre-eminent among them—so that out of a gory past only a few shadowy names of bird-lovers emerge, Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, ABlian. Ornithology as a science is modern, at best not over two centuries and a half old, while as a popular pursuit its age is better reckoned by decades. It is, therefore, highly gratifying to those who feel this primal instinct strongly to be able to note the rising tide of interest in their favorite study. Ornithology has received unwonted attention of late, not only in scientific works but also in popular literature, and it has taken at last a deserved place upon the curriculum of many of our colleges and secondary schools. We of the West are just waking, not too tardily we hope, to a realization of our priceless heritage of friendship in the birds. Our homesteads have been chosen and our rights to them established; now we are looking about us to take account of our situation, to see whether indeed the lines have fallen unto us in pleasant places, and to reckon up the forces which make for happiness, welfare, and peace. And not the least of our resources we find to be the birds of Washing- ton. They are here as economic allies, to bear their part in the distribution of plant life, and to wage with us unceasing warfare against insect and rodent foes, which would threaten the beneficence of that life. They are here, some of them, to supply our larder and to furnish occupation for us in the predatory mood. sut above all, they are here to add zest to the enjoyment of life itself; to please the eye by a display of graceful form and piquant color; t@ stir the depths of human emotion with their marvelous gift of song; to tease the imagination by their exhibitions of flight; or to goad aspiration as they seek in their migrations the mysterious, alluring and ever insatiable Beyond. Indeed, it is scarcely too much to say that we may learn from the birds manners which will correct our own; that is, stimulate us to the full realization in our own lives of that ethical program which their tender domestic relations so clearly foreshadow. V. Vi. 4 In the matter herein recorded account has of course been taken of nearly all that has been done by other workers, but the literature of the birds of Wash- ington is very meager, being chiefly confined to annotated lists, and the conclusions reached have necessarily been based upon our own experience, comprising some thirteen years residence in the State in the case of Mr. Bowles, and a little more in my own. Field work has been about equally divided between the East-side and the West-side and we have both been able to give practically all our time to this cause during the nesting seasons of the past four years. Parts of several seasons have been spent in the Cascade Mountains, but there remains much to learn of bird-life in the high Cascades, while the conditions existing in the Blue Mountains and in the Olympics are still largely to be inferred. Two practically complete surveys were made of island life along the West Coast, in the summers of 1906 and 1907; and we feel that our nesting sea-birds at least are fairly well understood. Altho necessarily bulky, these volumes are by no means exhaustive. No attempt has been made to tell all that is known or may be known of a given species. It has been our constant endeavor, however, to present something like a true proportion of interest as between the birds, to exhibit a’ species as it appears toa Washingtonian. On this account certain prosy fellows have received extended treatment merely because they are ours and have to be reckoned with; while others, more interesting, perhaps, have not been considered at length simply because we are not responsible for them as characteristic birds of Washington. In writing, however, two classes of readers have had to be considered,—first, the Washingtonian who needs to have his interest aroused in the birds of his home State, and second, the serious ornithological student in the East. For the sake of the former we have introduced some familiar matter from other sources, including a previous work® of the author’s,and for this we must ask the indulgence of ornithologists. For the sake of the latter we have dilated upon certain points not elsewhere covered in the case of certain Western birds,—matters of abun- dance, distribution, sub-specific variety, ete., of dubious interest to our local patrons; and for this we must in turn ask their indulgence. The order of treatment observed in the following pages is substantially the reverse of that long followed by the American Ornithologists’ Union, and is justifiable principally on the ground that it follows a certain order of interest and convenience. Beginning, as it does, with the supposedly highest forms of bird- life, it brings to the fore the most familiar birds, and avoids that rude juxtaposi- tion of the lowest form of one group with the highest of the one above it, which has been the confessed weakness of the A. O. U. arrangement. The outlines of classification may be found in the Table of Contents to each volume, and a brief synopsis of generic, family, and ordinal characters, in the a. The Birds of Ohio, by William Leon Dawson, A. M., B. D., with Introduction and Analytical Keys by Lynds Jones, M. Sc. One and Two Volumes, pp. xviii. 4+ 671. Columbus, The Wheaton Publishing Company, 1903. Vil. Analytical Key prepared by Professor Jones. It has not been thought best to give large place to these matters nor to intrude them upon the text, because of the many excellent manuals which already exist giving especial attention to this field. The nomenclature is chiefly that of the A. O. U. Check-List, Second Edition, revised to include the Fourteenth Supplement, to which reference is made by number. Departures have in a few instances been made, changes sanctioned by Ridgway or Coues, or justified by a consideration of local material. It is, of course, unfortunate that the publication of the Third Edition of the A. O. U. Check-List has been so long delayed, insomuch that it is not even yet available. On this account it has not been deemed worth while to provide in these volumes a separate check-list, based on the A. O. U. order, as had been intended. Care has been exercised in the selection of the English or vernacular names of the birds, to offer those which on the whole seem best fitted to survive locally. Unnecessary departures from eastern usage have been avoided, and_ the changes made have been carefully considered. As matter of fact, the English nomenclature has of late been much more stable than the Latin. For instance. no one has any difficulty in tracing the Western Winter Wren thru the literature of the past half century; but the bird referred to has, within the last decade, posed successively under the following scientific names: Troglodytes hiemalis pacificus, Anorthura h. p., Olbiorchilus h. p., and Nannus h. p., and these with the sanction of the A. O. U. Committee—certainly a striking example of how not to secure stability in nomenclature. With such an example before us we may perhaps be pardoned for having in instances failed to note the latest discovery of the name-hunter, but we have humbly tried to follow our agile leaders. In the preparation of plumage descriptions, the attempt to derive them from local collections was partially abandoned because of the meagerness of the ma- terials offered. If the work had been purely British Columbian, the excellent collection of the Provincial Museum at Victoria would have been nearly sufficient ; but there is crying need of a large, well-kept, central collection of skins and mounted birds here in Washington. A creditable showing is being made at Pullman under the energetic leadership of Professor W. T. Shaw, and the State College will always require a representative working collection. The University of Washington, however, is the natural repository for West-side specimens, and perhaps for the official collection of the State, and it is to be devoutly hoped that its present ill-assorted and ill-housed accumulations may early give place to a worthy and complete display of Washington birds. Amongyprivate collections that of Mr. J. M. Edson, of Bellingham, is the most notable, representing, as it does, the patient occupation of extra hours for the past eighteen years. I am under obligation to Mr. Edson for a check-list of his collection (comprising entirely local species), as also for a list of the birds of the Museum of the Belling- ham Normal School. The small but well-selected assortment of bird-skins belong- ing to Messrs. C. W. and J. H. Bowles rests in the Ferry Museum in Tacoma. vill. Here also Mr. Geo, C, Cantwell has left his bird-skins, partly local and partly Alaskan, on view. Fortunately the task of.redescribing the plumage of Washington birds has been rendered less necessary for a work of such scope as ours, thru the appearance of the Fifth Edition of Coues Key,* embodying, as it does the ripened conclusions of a uniquely gifted ornithological writer, and above all, by the great definitive work from the hand of Professor Ridgway,” now more than half completed. These final works by the masters of our craft render the careful repetition of such effort superfluous, and I have no hesitation in admitting that we are almost as much indebted to them as to local collections, altho a not inconsiderable part of the author's original work upon plumage description in “The Birds of Ohio” has been utilized, or re-worked, wherever applicable. In compiling the General Ranges, we wish to acknowledge indebtedness both to the A. O. U. Check-List (2nd Edition) and to the summaries of Ridgway and Coues in the works already mentioned. In the Range in Washington, we have tried to take account of all published records, but have been obliged in most instances to rely upon personal experience, and to express judgments which must vary in accuracy with each individual case. The final work upon migrations in Washington is still to be done. Our own task has called us hither and yonder each season to such an extent that consecutive work in any one locality has been impossible, and there appears not to be any one in the State who has seriously set himself to record the movements of the birds in chronological order. Success in this line depends upon coéperative work on the part of many widely distributed observers, carried out thru a considerable term of years. It is one of the aims of these volumes to stimulate such endeavor, and the author invites correspondence to the end that such an undertaking may be carried out systematically. In citing authorities, we have aimed to recall the first publication of each species as a bird of Washington, giving in italics the name originally assigned the bird, if different from the one now used, together with the name of the author in bold-face type. In many instances early references are uncertain, chiefly by reason of failure to distinguish between the two States now separated by the Columbia River, but once comprehended under the name Oregon Territory. Such citations are questioned or bracketed, as are all those which omit or disregard scientific names. The abbreviated references are to standard faunal lists appear- ing in the columns of “The Auk” and elsewhere, and these are noted more carefully under the head of Bibliography, among the Appendices. At the outset I wish to explain the peculiar relation which exists between a. Key to North American Birds, by Elliott Coues, A, M., M. D., Ph. D., Fifth Edition (entirely revised), in Two Volumes; pp. xli.+ 1152. Boston, Dana Estes and Company, 1903. b. The Birds of North and Middle America, by Robert Ridgway, Curator, Division of Birds, U. S. National Museum, Bulletin of the U. S. N. M., No. so; Pt. L, Fringillidae, pp. xxxi. +715 and Pl. XX. (1901); Pt, IL., Tanagridae, etc, pp. xx. +8345 and Pl. NXII, (1902); Pe. IIl., Motacillidae, etc., pp. xx. + 801 and Pi. XIX. (1904); Pt, IV., Turdidae, ete., pp. xxll.+o73 and Pl. XXXIV. (s907). 1x. myself and the junior author, Mr. J. H. Bowles. Each of us had long had in mind the thought of preparing a work upon the birds of Washington; but Mr. Bowles, during my residence in Ohio, was the first to undertake the task, and had a book actually half written when I returned to the scene with friendly overtures. Since my plans were rather more extended than his, and since it was necessary that one of us should devote his entire time to the work, Mr. Bowles, with unbounded generosity, placed the result of his labors at my disposal and declared his willingness to further the enterprise under my leadership in every possible way. Except, therefore, in the case of signed articles from his pen, and in most of the unsigned articles on Grouse and Ducks, where our work has been a strict collaboration, the actual writing of the book has fallen to my lot. In practice, therefore, | have found myself under every degree of indebtedness to Mr. Bowles, according as my own materials were abundant or meager, or as his information or mine was more pertinent in a given case. Mr. Bowles has been as good as his word in the matter of codperation, and has lavished his time in the quest of new species, or in the discovery of new nests, or in the location of choice subjects for the camera, solely that the book might profit thereby. In several expeditions he has accompanied me. On this account, therefore, the text in its pronouns, “I,” “we,” or “he,” bears witness to a sort of sliding scale of intimacy, which, unless explained, might be puzzling to the casual reader. I am especially indebted to Mr. Bowles for extended material upon the nesting of the birds; and my only regret is that the varying requirements of the task so often compelled me to condense his excellent sketches into the meager sentences which appear under the head “Nesting.” Not infrequently, however, I have thrown a few adjectives into Mr. Bowles’s paragraphs and incorporated them without distinguishing comment, in expectation that our joint indebtedness will hardly excite the curiosity of any disengaged “higher critic” of ornithology. Let me, then, express my very deep gratitude to Mr. Bowles for his generosity and my sincere appreciation of his abilities so imperfectly exhibited, I fear, in the following pages, where I have necessarily usurped the opportunity. It is matter of regret to the author that the size of these volumes, now considerably in excess of that originally contemplated, has precluded the possi- bility of an extended physical and climatic survey of Washington. ‘The striking dissimilarity of conditions which obtain as between the eastern side of the State and the western are familiar to its citizens and may be easily inferred by others from a perusal of the following pages. Our State is excélled by none in its diversity of climatic and physiographic features. The ornithologist, therefore, may indulge his proclivities in half a dozen different bird-worlds without once leaving our borders. Especially might the taxonomist, the subspecies-hunter, revel in the minute shades of difference in plumage which characterize the representa- tives of the same species as they appear in different sections of our State. We have not gone into these matters very carefully, because our interests are rather Xx. those of avian psychology, and of the domestic and social relations of the birds,— in short, the /ife interests. While the author's point of view has been that of a bird-lover, some things herein recorded may seem inconsistent with the claim of that title. The fact is that none of us are quite consistent in our attitude toward the bird-world. The interests of sport and the interests of science must sometimes come into conflict with those of sentiment; and if one confesses allegiance to all three at once he will inevitably appear to the partisans of either in a bad light. However, a real principle of unity is found when we come to regard the bird’s value to society. The question then becomes, not, Is this bird worth more to me in my collection or upon my plate than as a living actor in the drama of life? but, In what capacity can this bird best serve the interests of mankind? There can be no doubt that the answer to the latter question is usually and increasingly, 4s a living bird. Stuffed specimens we need, but only a representative number of them; only a limited few of us are fitted to enjoy the pleasures of the chase, and the objects of our passion are rapidly passing from view anyway; but never while the hearts of men are set on peace, and the minds of men are alert to receive the impressions of the Infinite, will there be too many birds to speak to eye and ear, and to minister to the hidden things of the spirit. The birds belong to the people, not to a clique or a coterie, but to all the people as heirs and stewards of the good things of God. It is of the esthetic value of the bird that we have tried to speak, not alone in ‘our descriptions but in our pictures. The author has a pleasant conviction, born of desire perhaps, that the bird in art is destined to figure much more largely in future years than heretofore. We have learned something from the Japanese in this regard, but more perhaps from the camera, whose revelations have marvel- ously justified the conventional conclusions of Japanese decorative art. Nature is ever the nursing mother of Art. While our function in the text has necessarily been interpretative, we have preferred in the pictures to let Nature speak for herself, and we have held ourselves and our artists to the strictest accounting for any retouching or modification of photographs. Except, therefore, as explicitly noted, the half-tones from photographs are faithful presentations of life. If they inspire any with a sense of the beauty of things as they are, or suggest to any the theme for some composition, whether of canvas, fresco, vase, or tile, in things as they might be, then our labor shall not have been in vain. In this connection we have to congratulate ourselves upon the discovery, virtually in our midst, of such a promising bird-artist as Mr. Allan Brooks. I can testify to the fidelity of his work, as all can to the delicacy and artistic feeling displayed even under the inevitable handicap of half-tone reproduction. My sincerest thanks are due Mr. Brooks for his hearty and generous coOperation in this enterprise; and if our work shall meet with approval, I shall feel that a large measure of credit is due to him. The joy of work is in the doing of it, while as for credit, or “fame,” that is a mere by-product. He who does not do his work under a sense of privilege is a Xi. hireling, a clock-watcher, and his sufficient as coveted meed is the pay envelope. 3ut those of us who enjoy the work are sufficiently rewarded already. What tho the envelope be empty! We've had our fun and—well, yes, we'd do it again, especially if you thought it worth while. But the chief reward of this labor of love has been the sense of fellowship engendered. The progress of the work under what seemed at times insuperable difficulties has been, nevertheless, a continuous revelation of good will. “Every- body helps” is the motto of the Seattle spirit, and it is just as characteristic of the entire Pacific Northwest. Everybody has helped and the result is a composite achievement, a monument of patience, fidelity, and generosity far other than my own. I gratefully acknowledge indebtedness to Professor Robert Ridgway for counsel and assistance in determining State records; to Dr. A. K. Fisher for records and for comparison of specimens; to Dr. Chas. W. Richmond for con- firmation of records; to Messrs. William L. Finley, Herman T. Bohlman, A. W. Anthony, W. H. Wright, Fred. S. Merrill, Warburton Pike, Walter I. Burton, A. Gordon Bowles, and Walter K. Fisher, for the use of photographs; to Messrs. J. M. Edson, D. E. Brown, A. B. Reagan, E. S. Woodcock, and to a score of others beside for hospitality and for assistance afield; to Samuel Rathbun, Prof. E. S. Meany, Prof. O. B. Johnson, Prof. W. T. Shaw, Miss Adelaide Pol- lock, and Miss Jennie V. Getty, for generous cooperation and courtesies of many sorts; to Francis Kermode, Esq., for use of the Provincial Museum collections, and to Prof. Trevor Kincaid for similar permission in case of the University of Washington collections. My special thanks are due my friend, Prof. Lynds Jones, the proven comrade of many an ornithological cruise, who upon brief notice and at no little sacrifice has prepared the Analytical Key which accompanies this work. My wife has rendered invaluable service in preparing manuscript for press, and has shared with me the arduous duties of proof-reading. My father, Rev. W. E. Dawson, of Blaine, has gone over most of the manuscript and has offered many highly esteemed suggestions. To our patrons and subscribers, whose timely and indulgent support has made this enterprise possible, I offer my sincerest thanks. To the trustees of the Occidental Publishing Company I am under a lasting debt of gratitude, in that they have planned and counselled freely, and in that they have so heartily seconded my efforts to make this work as beautiful as possible with the funds at command. One’s roll of obligations cannot be reckoned complete without some recogni- tion also of the dumb things, the products of stranger hearts and brains, which have faithfully served their uses in this undertaking: my Warner-and-Swasey binoculars (8-power )—I would not undertake to write a bird-book without them; the Graflex camera, which has taken most of the life portraits; the King canvas boat which has made study of the interior lake life possible; orable mention. Then there is the physical side of the book itself. One cannot reckon up the all deserve hon- xii. 4 myriad hands that have wrought upon it, engravers, printers, binders, paper- makers, messengers, even the humble goatherds in far-off Armenia, each for a season giving of his best—out of love, I trust. Brothers, I thank you all! Of the many shortcomings of this work no one could be more sensible than its author. We should all prefer to spend a life-time writing a book, and having written it, to return and do it over again, somewhat otherwise. But book-making is like matrimony, for better or for worse. There is a finality about it which takes the comfort from one’s muttered declaration, “I could do it better another time.” What I have written I have written. I go now to spend a quiet day— with the birds. Wittiam Leon Dawson. PREFACE ISTORP MULES A CEE mUSDRA EONS ace cree. Gkoiaelevetsicreis erolelere wel s cushe sek CONTENTS OF VOLUME I. DescrIPpTION oF SpEcIES Nos. I-I81. Order Passeres—Perching Birds. Suborder OSCINES—Song Birds. NOS. Family Corvide—The Crows and Jays............... I-14 Teteride— hes Urouptals en crs stcmas este so -seoe eer 15-22 Brimngiulida=—hiemEinchesue sae. -\t ea. es 23-68 Tanagrnde—Vhe Danagers .:.......<.0:..---- 69 Mniotiltide—The Wood Warblers ............ 70-86 Alandid@— Whew arksy ric -yamvateicsnienelav- (tes rvecre.om 87-89 Motacillide—TVhe Wagtails and Pipits......... go mi cidc—hhemubnisnesm seem set create QI-102 Sylviide—The Old World Warblers, Kinglets, ands Gnatcatcherss st sise erie eters cli cls = 103-105 Baride— ner Wit Cen 4 to)- eietviees stele gcleus Se ays 106-110 Suid 2— sbhewiNibiatChes! violas asia III-113 Certhtide—The Creepers .............222005- II4, 115 liroglodytide@—— Whe? Wrens ec ea. eer sire ws 6 octane 116-122 Minide—The Mockingbirds ..............™. 123, 124 Ciichde—— Une MDIppeErs) arrryerisccis cls ons e e re 125 Airundimde—The Swallows’ ....:......:...-. 126-132 Ampelidea—The Waxwings ..........2.+-++6- 133, 134 Eannde—— hey Shrikes oii. a2 wees wwe + tee 135-137 Vareonid@—Dhe VireOs) 2.0.06. wie eve ea ee aes 138-141 xiv. 4 Suborder CLAMATORES—Songless Perching Birds. Family Tyrannide—The Tyrant Flycatchers........... Order Macrochires—Goatsuckers, Swifts, etc. Suborder TROCH/L/J—Hummers. Family Trochilide—The Hummingbirds .............. Suborder C4PRIMULG/—Goatsuckers. Family Caprimulgide—The Nighthawks (Goatsuckers, oA a ener ririrc: moet cic mee Suborder CY PSEL/J—Swiits. Family Micropodide—The Swifts ................++- Order Pici—Picarian Birds. Family Picidea—The Woodpeckers .............+++0+- Order Coccyges—Cuculiform Birds. Suborder CUCULI—Cuckoos. Family Cuculid@a—The Cuckoos ..........++.-020000 Suborder 4LCYONES—Kingfishers. Family Alcedinide—The Kingfishers ................. NOS. 142-151 “152-155 PAGE. 309 393 404 410 418 452 454 EIST OF FULL-PAGE ILEUSTRATIONS. PAGE OR FACING PAGE. HEPBURN S JUEUCOSTTCrE \(Color-plate)! =i 20.5 a2. 202 ances sees Frontispiece IN ORIEL E Rats CAEN M(oElicll te- COME) eerste sey ces) Ia cctsRaoisherens oi ekegersteushersesyereieate 3 /AMTRVIOAN, MUNG. ((lekihiavente))\s 665 ooo ooonteOemoo omc eD os ounbadpooonoS 25 BEL OCKe ORTORESH(COlOG-plate))eerieia aise acai oe oe en aoe stot yao 0) oars 52 WESTERI ISVENING GROSBEAKS: (IColor-plate) ia. ce cs- 2 ato ar ome oes 68 AUDUBOND WARBEERe ((COlLOG= plate) rrera ere e seater su syoqn ia orenaisieie a rsieve el snchets sie iey~:< 182 TOWNSEND WARBLERS, MALE AND FEMALE (Half-tone).................. IOI MROUMITE MV WARBEMR Se (ielalt CONG) is ream ce ia sncrewal sie torte ono cto gaac och ote lersyereits 199 (COLDENS VWARBEER (Coloteplate) icc: -1s pace nam cease Sess sole dene Sl Slee swe 208 CHESTNUIEPACKED | CHICKADEE ((hlalif=fOMEG)|traa are.6 doit ois elev elel ene ees ever 283 NESTING SITE OF THE TAWNY CREEPER (Half-tone).....................-. 299 WIGEED-GREPNE SWALLOW (COlOL-plate) irri ieieie oe ee) iar rel «see stoites ene 340 (Canis Islaitavicasy (Colter Ehe))e oo oneoc aemn obs dane oop DoouDOUDOUoDEE 400 GATRONER = VVOODPECKER! |(blalif=tome)))aversciy. cies le 1b ace wrelels olin wloeheine.she ote 425 IRED-BREASTED) SAPSUGKER \((Color-plate) i. 2.3. <- sens oe fl cies se 434 XV. The Birds of Washington VO. 1. Description of Species Nos. 1-181 THE BIRDS OF WASHINGTON No. 1. NORTHERN RAVEN. A. O. U. No. 486a. Corvus corax principalis Ridgw. Synonym.—Formerly called the AMERICAN Raven. Description.—Color uniform lustrous black; plumage, especially on breast, scapulars and back, showing steel-blue or purplish iridescence; feathers of the throat long, narrow, pointed, light gray basally; primaries whitening at base. Length two feet or over, female a little smaller; wing 17.00-18.00 (438) ; tail 10.00 (247); bill 3.20 (76.5); depth of bill at nostril 1.00 (28.5); tarsus 2.68 (68). Recognition Marks.—Large size—about twice as big as a Crow; long rounded tail; harsh croaking notes; uniform black coloration. Indistinguishable afield from simuatus. Nesting.—N est: a large but compact mass of sticks, lined with grass, wool, cow-hair, ete., placed high in fir trees or upon inaccessible cliffs. Eggs: 4-7 (8 of record), usually 5, pale bluish green or olive, spotted, blotched, and dashed with greenish brown and obscure lilac or purple. Av. size, 1.90 x 1.33 (48.26 x 33.78). Season: April 15; one brood. General Range.—‘Arctic and Boreal Provinces of North America; south to Eastern British Provinces, portions of New England, and Atlantic Coast of United States, higher Alleghenies, region of the Great Takes, western and northern Washington, etc.” (Ridgway). Range in Washington.—Found sparingly in the Cascade and Olympic Mountains, more commonly along the Pacific Coast. Migrations.—Resident but wide ranging. Authorities.—[ Lewis and Clark, Hist. Ex. (1814), Ed Biddle: Coues, Vol. II. p. 185.] Corvus carnivorus Bartram, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, pp 5On, 502) 5027 (La C&S. ex DiGe). Bak. Specimens.—( U. of. W.) Prov. C. 2 THE NORTHERN RAVEN: ALTHO nowhere abundant, in the sense which obtains among smaller species, nor as widely distributed as some, there is probably no other bird which has attracted such universal attention, or has left so deep an impress upon history and literature as the Raven. Primitive man has always felt the spell of his sombre presence, and the Raven was as deeply imbedded in the folk- lore of the maritime Grecian tribes as he is today in that of the Makahs and Quillayutes upon our own coast. Korax, the Greek called him, in imitation of his hoarse cry, Kraack, kraack; while the Sanskrit name, Karava, reveals the ancient root from which have sprung both Crow and Raven. Quick-sighted, cunning, and audacious, this bird of sinister aspect has been invested by peoples of all ages with a mysterious and semi-sacred char- acter. His ominous croakings were thought to have prophetic import, while his preternatural shrewdness has made him, with many, a symbol of divine knowledge. We may not go such lengths, but we are justified in placing this bird at the head of our list; and we must agree with Professor Alfred Newton that the Raven is “the largest of the Birds of the Order Passeres, and probably the most highly developed of all Birds.” The Raven is a bird of the wilderness; and, in spite of all his cunning, he fares but ill in the presence of breech-loaders and iconoclasts. While it has not been the object of any special persecution in Washington, it seems to share the fate reserved for all who lift their heads above the common level; and it is now nearly confined in its local distribution to the Olympic peninsula; and is nowhere common, save in the vicinity of the Indian villages which still cling to our western shore. In appearance the Raven presents many points of difference from the Common Crow, especially when contrasted with the dwarf examples of the northwestern race. It is not only larger, but its tail is relatively much longer, and fully rounded. The head, too, is fuller, and the bill proportionately stouter with more rounded culmen. The feathers of the neck are loosely arranged, resulting in an impressive shagginess; and there is a sort of un- couthness about these ancient birds, as compared with the more dapper Crow. Ravens are unscrupulous in diet, and therefrom has arisen much of the dislike which has attached to them. They not only subsist upon insects, worms, frogs, shellfish, and cast-up offal, but devour the eggs and young of sea-birds ; and, when pressed by hunger, do not scruple to attack rabbits, young lambs, or seal pups. In fact, nothing fleshly and edible comes amiss to them. In collecting along the sea-coast I once lost some sandpipers,—which I had not had time to prepare the evening before—because the dark watcher was “up first”. Like the Fish Crow, they hang about the Indian villages to some NORTHERN RAVEN 4 THE NORTHERN RAVER, extent, and dispute with the ubiquitous Indian dog the chance at decayed fish and offal. Altho by force of circumstances driven to accept shelter and nesting sites in the dense forests of the western Olympic slope, the Raven is a great lover of the sea-cliffs and of all wild scenery. Stormy days are his especial delight and he soars about in the teeth of the gale, exulting, like Lear, in the tumult: “Blow winds, and crack your cheeks!" The sable bird is rather majestic on the wing, and he soars aloft at times with something of the motion and dignity of the Eagle. But the Corvine character is complex; and its gravest represen- tatives do some astonishingly boyish things. For instance, according to Nelson, they will take sea-urchins high in air and drop them on the cliffs, for no better reason, apparently, than to hear them smash. Or, again, they will catch the luckless urchins in mid-air with all the delight of school-boys at tom-ball. Nests are to be found midway of sea-cliffs in studiously inaccessible places, or else high in evergreen trees. Eggs, to the number of five or six, are deposited in April; and the young are fed upon the choicest which the (egg) market affords. We shall need to apologize occasionally for the short- comings of our favorites, and we confess at the outset to shameless incon- sistency; for even bird villains are dear to us, if they be not too bad, and especially if their badness be not directed against us. Who would wish to see this bold, black brigand, savage, cunning, and unscrupulous as he is, dis appear entirely from our shores? He is the deep shadow of the world’s chiaroscuro; and what were white, pray. without black by which to meas- ure it? luthor. ‘OINT-OF-THE-ARCHES GROUP, A CHARACTERISTIC HAUNT OF THE RAVEN THE MEXICAN RAVEN. ut No. 2. MEXICAN RAVEN. A. O. U. No. 486. Corvus corax sinuatus (\Wagler). Synonyms.—AMERICAN RAVEN. SOUTHERN RAVEN. Description.—Like preceding but averaging smaller; bill relatively snialler and narrower; tarsus not so stout. Length up to 26 inches, but averaging less. Culmen 2.85 (72). Recognition Marks.—As in preceding—distinguishable only by range. Nesting.—Nest: placed on ledge or in crannies of basalt cliffs, more rarely in pine trees. General Range.—Western United States chiefly west of the Rocky Moun- tains; in its northerly extension nearly coincident with the Upper Sonoran life zone, south to Honduras. Range in Washington.—May be arbitrarily defined as restricted to the East-side, but common only on the treeless plains and in the Blue Mountain region. Resident. Authorities.—Corvus carnivorus Bart., Cooper and Suckley, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. XII. pt. Il. 1860, p. 210. Bendire, Life Hist. N. A. Birds, Vol. II. p- 396 f. IT is no mere association of ideas which has made the Raven the bird of ill omen. Black is his wing, and black is his heart, as well. While it may be allowed that he works no direct damage upon the human race, we cannot but share in sympathy the burden of the bird-world which regards him as the bete noir, diabolical in cunning, patient as fate, and relentless in the hour of opportunity. As I sit on an early May morning by the water's edge on a lonely island in the Columbia River, all nature seems harmonious and glad. The Meadow- larks are pricking the atmosphere with goads of good cheer in the sage behind; the Dove is pledging his heart's affection in the cottonwood hard by; the river is singing on the rapids; and my heart is won to follow on that buoyant tide—when suddenly a mother Goose cries out in terror and I leap to my feet to learn the cause. I have not long to wait. Like a death knell comes the guttural croak of the Raven. He has spied upon her, learned her secret, swept in when her precious eggs were uncovered; and he bears one off in triumph,—a feast for his carrion brood. When one has seen this sort of thing a dozen times, and heard the wail of the wild things, the croak of the Raven comes to be fraught with menace, the veritable voice of doom. To be sure, the Raven is not really worse than his kin, but he is dis- tinguished by a bass voice; and does not the villain in the play always sing ? Somehow, one never believes the ill he hears of the soulful tenor, even tho he sees him do it; but beware of the bird or man who croaks at low C. > bass: THE MEXICAN RAVEN? Of all students of bird-life in the West, Captain Bendire has enjoyed the best opportunities for the study of the Raven; and his situation at Camp Har- ney in eastern Oregon was very similar to such as may be found in the south eastern part of our own State. Of this species,as observed at that point, he says: “They are stately and rather sedate-looking birds, remain mated thru life, and are seemingly very much attached to each other, but apparently more unsocial to others of their kind. On the ground their movements are delib- ' THR RA\ N’S FIEI erate and d walk is graceful and seldom varied by hurried hops jumps to still better advantage on the wing, especially in plaving with each when pairs may be trequently seen r, performing extraordinary feats in the air, such as somersaults, trying fly on their backs, etc \t this season they seem to enjoy life most and to e vent to their usually not very exuberant spirits by a cure ling notes, evidently indifferent efforts at singing ary call is a loud Craack-craack, varied sometimes by a deep THE MEXICAN RAVEN. 7 grunting koerr-koerr, and again by a clucking, a sort of self-satisfied sound, difficult to reproduce on paper; in fact they utter a variety of notes when at ease and undisturbed, among others a metallic sounding klunk, which seems to cost them considerable effort. In places where they are not molested they become reasonably tame, and I have seen Ravens occasionally alight in my yard and feed among the chickens, a thing I have never seen Crows do. * * * “Out of some twenty nests examined only one was placed in a tree. It was in a good sized dead willow, twenty feet from the ground, on an island NESTING HAUNT OF THE MEXICAN RAVEN in Sylvies River, Oregon, and easily reached; it contained five fresh eggs on April 13, 1875. The other nests were placed on cliffs, and, with few excep- tions, in positions where they were comparatively secure. Usually the nest could not be seen from above, and it generally took several assistants and strong ropes to get near them, and even then it was frequently impossible to reach the eggs without the aid of a long pole with a dipperattached to the end. A favorite site was a cliff with a southern exposure, where the nest was com- pletely covered from above by a projecting rock.” Having once chosen a nesting site, the Ravens evince a great attachment for that particular locality; and, rather than desert it, will avoid notice by deferring the nesting season, or by visiting the eggs or young only at night. We have no records of the taking of Raven’s eggs in Washington, but it 8 THE WESTERN CROWR, does unquestionably breed here. A nest was reported to us on a cliff in the Crab Creek Coulee, While we were unable to visit it in season, we did come upon a family group some weeks later, comprising the two adults and five grown young. This is possibly the northernmost breeding station of the Mexican Raven yet reported. No. 3. WESTERN CROW. A, O. U, No. 488b. Corvus brachyrhynchos hesperis (Ridgw.). Synonyms.—CaLirorn1A Crow. ComMon Crow. AMERICAN Crow. Description.—Entire plumage glossy black, for the most part with greenish blue, steel-blue, and purplish reflections; feathers of the neck normal, rounded. Bill and feet black; iris brown. Length 16.00-20.00; wing 12.00 (302); tail 6.70 (170) ; bill 1.83 (46.5) ; depth at nostril .65 (16.5). Female averages smaller than male. Recognition Marks.—Distinguishable from Northwest Crow by larger size and clearer voice. Nesting.—Nest: a neat hemisphere of sticks and twigs carefully lined with bark, roots and trash, and placed 10-60 feet high in trees—willow, aspen, pine, or fir. Eggs: 4-6, usually 5, same coloring as Raven's. Occasionally fine -nark- ings produce a uniform olive-green, or even olive-brown effect. Av. size 1.66 X 1.1€ (42.2 x 29.5). Season: April 15-May 15; one brood. General Range.—Western United States from Rocky Mts. to Pacific Coast, save shores of northwestern Washington, north in the interior of British Columbia, south to Arizona. Range in Washington.—Of general distribution along streams and in settled portions of State, save along shores of Puget Sound, the Straits, and the Pacific north of Gray’s Harbor. Not found in the mountains nor the deeper forests, and only locally on the sage-brush plains. Migrations.—Resident but gregarious and localized in winter. The winter “roosts” break up late in February. Authorities.—Corvus americanus Aud., Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Sury. IX. 1858, 566 (part). Brewster, B. N. O. C. VII. 227. il C&S. D:. Kb. Ra. D?. Sst. Ss?. Kk. J.B. E. Specimens.—BN( ?). WHILE the Raven holds a secure place in mythology and literature, it is the Crow, rather, which is the object of common notice. No landscape is too poor to boast this jetty adornment; and no morning chorus is complete without the distant sub-dominant of his powerful voice, harsh and protesting tho it be. The dusky bird is a notorious mischief-maker, but he is not quite so black as he has been painted. More than any other bird he has successfully matched his wits against those of man, and his frequent easy victories and consequent THE WESTERN CROW. 9 boastings are responsible in large measure for the unsavory reputation in which he is held. It is a familiar adage in ebony circles that the proper study of Crow-kind is man, and so well has he pursued this study that he may fairly be said to hold his own in spite of fierce and ingenious perse- cution. He rejoices in the name _ of WESTERN CROW AT NES outlaw, and ages of ill-treatment have only served to sharpen his wits and intensify his cunning. That the warfare waged against him is largely unnecessary, and partly unjust, has been pretty clearly proven of late by scientists who have investi gated the Crow’s food habits. It is true that he destroys large numbers of eggs and nestlings, and, if allowed to, that he will occasionally invade the g poultry yard—and for such conduct there can be no apology. It is true, also, that some damage is inflicted upon corn in the roasting-ear stage, and that corn left out thru the winter constitutes a staple article of Crow diet. But it is estimated that birds and eggs form only about one-half of one per cent of their total diet; and in the case of grain, certainly they perform conspicuous services in raising the crop. Besides the articles of food mentioned, great 10 THE WESTERN CROW§ quantities of crickets, beetles, grasshoppers, caterpillars, cut-worms, and spid- ers, are consumed. Frogs, lizards, mice, and snakes also appear occasionally upon the bill of fare. On the whole, therefore, the Crow is not an economic Gorgon, and his destruction need not largely concern the farmer, altho it is always well to teach the bird a proper reverence. The psychology of the Crow is worthy of a separate treatise. All birds have a certain faculty of direct perception, which we are pleased to call in- stinct ; but the Crow, at least, comes delightfully near to reasoning. It is on account of his phenomenal brightness that a young Crow is among the most interesting of pets. If taken from the nest and well treated, a young Crow can be given such a large measure of freedom as fully to justify the experiment from a humanitarian standpoint. Of course the sure end of such a pet is death by an ignorant neighbor’s gun, but the dear departed is embalmed in memory to such a degree that all Crows are thereafter regarded as upon a higher plane. Everyone knows that Crows talk. Their cry is usually represented by a single syllable, caw, but it is capable of many and important modifications. For instance, keraw, keraw, comes from some irritated and apprehensive female, who is trying to smuggle a stick into the grove; kawk kawk-kawk proclaims sudden danger, and puts the flock into instant commotion; while caw-aw, Caw-aw, caw-aw, Te- assures them again. Once, in winter when the bird-man, for sport, was mys- tifying the local bird population by re- producing the notes of the Screech Owl, a company of Crows settled in the tops of neighboring trees, and earn estly discussed the probable nature of the object half- concealed under a camera cloth Finally, they gave it up and withdrew as cada Se fu ee _ ipa cee | supposed It NEST AND EGGS OF WESTERN CROW THE WESTERN CROW. II seems that one old fellow was not satished, for as I ventured to shift ever so little from my strained position, he set up a derisive Ca-a-a-aw from a branch over my head,—as who should say, “Aw, ye can’t fool me. Y’re just a ma-a-an,” and flapped away in disgust. Crows attempt certain musical notes as well; and, unless I mistake, the western bird has attained much greater proficiency in these. These notes are deeply guttural, and evidently entail considerable effort on the bird’s part. Hunger-o-ope, hunger-o-ope, one says; and it occurs to me that this is allied to the delary, delary, or springboard cry, of the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cris- tata) —plunging notes they have also been called. Space fails in which to describe the elaborate structure of Crow society ; to tell of the military and pedagogical systems which they enforce; of the courts of justice and penal institutions which they maintain; of the vigilantes who visit vengeance upon evil-minded owls and other offenders; or even of the games which they play,—tag, hide and seek, blind-man’s-buff and pull-away. These things are sufficiently attested by competent observers; we may only spare a word for that most serious business of life, nesting. A typical Crow’s nest is a very substantial affair, as our illustration shows. Upon a basis of coarse sticks, a mat of dried leaves, grasses, bark-strips, and dirt, or mud, is impressed. The deep rounded bowl thus formed is carefully lined with the inner bark of the willow or with twine, horse-hair, cow-hair, rabbit-fur, wool, or any other soft substance available. When completed the nesting hollow is seven or eight inches across and three or four deep. The expression “Crow’s nest,” as used to indicate disarray, really arises from the consideration of old nests. Since the birds resort to the same locality year after year, but never use an old nest, the neighboring structures of successive years come to represent every stage of dilapidation. West of the mountains nests are almost invariably placed well up in fir trees, hard against the trunk, and so escape the common observation. Upon the East-side, however, nests are usually placed in aspen trees or willows; in the former case occurring at heights up to fifty feet, in the latter from ten to twenty feet up. Escape by mere elevation being practically impossible, the Crows resort more or less to out-of-the-way places,—spring draws, river islands, and swampy thickets. Notwithstanding the fact that the spring season opens much earlier than in the East, the Crows, true to the traditions of a northern latitude, commonly defer nesting till late in April. Fresh eggs may be found by the 20th of April, but more surely on the 1st of May. Incubation lasts from fourteen to eighteen days; and the young, commonly five but sometimes six in number, are born naked and blind. It is when the Crow children are hatched that Nature begins to groan. It is then that birds’ eggs are quoted by the crate; and beetles by the hecatomb 12 THE NORTHWEST cROW, are sacrificed daily in a vain effort to satisfy the Gargantuan appetites of these young ebons. I once had the misfortune to pitch camp in a grove of willows which contained a nestful of Crows. The old birds never forgave me, but upbraided me in bitter language from early morn till dewy eve. The youngsters also suffered somewhat, I fear, for as often as a parent bird approached, cawing in a curiously muffled voice, choked with food, and detected me outside the tent, it swallowed its burden without compunction, in order that it might the more forcibly berate me. If the male happened to discover my out-of-doorness in the absence of his mate, he would rush at her when she hove in sight, in an officious, blustering way, and shout, “Look out there! Keep away! The Rhino is on the rampage again!” I learned, also, to recognize the appearance of hawks in the offing. At the first sign the Crow, presumably the male, begins to roll out objurgatory guttur- als as he hurries forward to meet the intruder. His utterances, freely trans- lated, run somewhat as follows: ‘That blank, blank Swainson Hawk! J thought I told him to keep away from here. Arrah, there, you slab-sided son of an owl! What are ye doing here? Git out o’ this! (Biff! Biff!) Git, I tell ye! (Biff!) If ever I set eyes on ye again, I'll feed ye to the coyotes. Git, now!” And all this without the slightest probability that the poor hawk would molest the hideous young pickaninnies if he did discover them. For when was a self-respecting hawk so lost to decency as to be willing to “eat crow’? No. 4. NORTHWEST CROW. ALO. U. No. 489. Corvus brachyrhynchos caurinus ( Baird). Synonyms.—Fisu Crow. Western Fisn Crow. Noriuwest Fisn Crow. Pucrer Sounp Crow. ‘Tipewarer Crow. Description.—Similar to C. b. hesperis, but decidedly smaller, with shorter tarsus and relatively smaller feet. Length 15.00-17.00; wing 11.00 (280) ; tail 6.00 (158); bill 1.80 (46); tarsus 1.95 (50). Recognition Marks.—An undersized Crow. Voice hoarse and flat as com- pared with that of the Western Crow. Haunts beaches and sea-girt rocks. Nesting.— Nest: a compact mass of twigs and bark-strips with occasionally a foundation of mud; lined carefully with fine bark-strips and hair; 4.00 deep and 7.00 across inside; placed 10-20 feet high in orchard or evergreen trees, sometimes in loose colony fashion. Eggs: 4 or 5, indistinguishable in color from those of the “THE NORTHWEST CROW. Ee Common Crow, but averaging smaller. A typical set averages 1.56 x 1.08 (39.6 x 27.4). Season: April 15-June 1; one brood. General Range.—American coasts of the North Pacific Ocean and its estuaries from Olympia and the mouth of the Columbia River north at least to the Alaskan peninsula. Range in Washington.—Shores and islands of Puget Sound, the Straits of Juan de Fuca, and the West Coast (at least as far south as Moclips, presum- ably to Cape Disappointment). Strictly resident. Authorities.—| Lewis and Clark, Hist. Ex. (1814), ed. Biddle: Coues, Vol. II. p. 185.] Corvus caurinus Baird, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. June 29, 1858, 569, 570. T. C&S. Lt. Rh. Kb. Ra. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. E. B. AFTER lengthy discussion it is pretty well settled that the Crow of the northwestern sea-coasts is merely a dwarfed race of the Corvus brachyrhynchos group; and that it shades perfectly into the prevailing western type, C. b. hes- peris, wherever that species occupies adjacent regions. This area of inter- gradation lies chiefly south and west of Puget Sound, in Washington; for the Crow is ever fond of the half-open country, and does not take kindly to the unmitigated forest depths, save where, as in the case of the Fish Crow, he may find relief upon the broad expanses of shore and tide-flats. The case is quite analogous to that of native man. The larger, more robust types were found in the eastern interior, while those tribes which were confined exclusively to residence upon the sea-shore tended to become dwarfed and stunted; and the region of intergradation lay not chiefly along the western slopes of the Cascades with their crushing weight of tall timber, but in the prairie regions bordering Puget Sound upon the south. It is impossible, therefore, to pronounce with certainty upon the sub- specific identity of Crows seen near shore in Mason, Thurston, Pierce, or even King County; but in Clallam, Jefferson, San Juan, and the other counties of the Northwest, one has no difficulty in recognizing the dwarf race. Not only are these Crows much smaller in point of size, but the voice is weaker, flatter, and more hoarse, as tho affected by an ever-present fog. So marked is this vocal change, that one may note the difference between birds seen along shore in Pierce County and those which frequent the uplands. However,—and this caution must be noted—the upland birds do visit the shore on occasion; and the regular shore dwellers are by no means confined thereto, as are the more typical birds found further north. The early observers were feeling for these differences, and if Nature did not afford sufficient ground for easy discrimination, imagination could supply the details. The following paragraph from the much quoted work* of John Keast Lord is interesting because deliciously untrue. a. “The Naturalist in Vancouver Island and British Columbia,” by John Keast Lord. Two Vols. London. Published by Richard Bentley, 1866. Vol. II., p. 7o. 14 THE NORTHWEST CROW. “The sea-coast is abandoned when the breeding time arrives early in May, when they resort in pairs to the interior; selecting a patch of open prairie, where there are streams and lakes and where the wild crab apple and white- thorn grows, in which they build nests precisely like that of the Magpie, arched over the top with sticks. The bird enters by a hole on one side but leaves by an exit hole in the opposite. The inside is plastered with mud; a few grass stalks strewn loosely on the bottom keep the eggs from rolling. This is so marked a difference to the Barking Crow’s nesting [Barking Crow” is J. K. L,.’s solecism for the Western Crow, C. b. hesperis], as in itself to be a specific distinction, ‘The eggs are lighter in blotching and much smaller. I examined great numbers [! !] of nests at this prairie and on the Columbia, but invariably found that the same habit of doming prevailed. After nesting, they return with the young to the sea-coasts, and remain in large flocks often associ- ated with Barking Crows until nesting time comes again.” —No single point of which has been con- firmed by succeed- ing observers. Dr. Cooper wrote* with exact truthful- ness: ‘This fish- crow frequents the coast and inlets of Taken at Neah Bay Photo by the Author. this Territory in eS REAR TOM Seay large numbers, and is much more gregarious and familiar than the common Crow. Otherwise it much resembles that bird in habits, being very sagacious, feeding on almost everything animal and vegetable, and having nearly the same cries, differing rather in tone than character. Its chief dependence for food being on the sea, it is generally found along the beach, devouring dead fish and other things brought up by the waves. It is also very fond of oysters, which it breaks by carrying them upward and dropping again on a rock or other hard material. When the tide is full they resort to the fields or dwellings near the shore and devour potatoes and other vegetables, offal, etc. They, like the gulls, perceive the instant of change of the tide, and flocks will then start off together for a favorite feeding ground, They are very troublesome to the Indians, stealing 1. Rep. Pac. R. R. Survey, Vol. XII, Bk. II, (Senate, 1860] THE NORTHWEST CROW. ———Ss un their dried fish and other things, while from superstitious feelings the Indians never kill them but set a child to watch and drive them away. They build in trees near the shore in the same way as the common crow and the young are fledged in May.” Mr. J. F. Edwards, a pioneer of "67, tells me that in the early days a small drove of pigs was an essential feature of every well-equipped saw-mill on Puget Sound. The pigs were given the freedom of the premises, slept in the saw dust, and dined behind the mess-house. Between meals they wandered down to the beach and rooted for clams at low tide. ‘The Crows were not slow to learn the advantages of this arrangement and posted them- selves promptly in the most commanding and only safe positions; viz., on the backs of the pigs. The pig grunted and squirmed, but Mr. Crow, mindful of the blessings ahead, merely extended a balancing wing and held on. ‘The instant the industrious rooter turned up a clam, the Crow darted down, seized it in his beak and made off; resigning his station to some sable brother, and leaving the porker to reflect discontentedly upon the rapacity of the upper classes. Mr. Edwards declares that he has seen this little comedy enacted, not once, but a hundred times, at Port Madison and at Alberni, V. I. The Fish Crows have learned from the gulls the delights of sailing the main on driftwood. I have seen numbers of them going out with the tide a mile or more from shore, and once a Crow kept company with three gulls on a float so small that the gulls had continually to strive for position; but the Crow stood undisturbed. BIRDS AND BOATS AT NEAH RAY Photo by the Author. 10 THE NORTHWEST CROW. Speaking of their aquatic tendencies, Mr. A. B. Reagan, of La Push, assures me that he has repeatedly seen them catch smelt in the ocean near shore. These fish become involved in the breakers and may be snatched from above by the dextrous bird without any severe wetting. Crows are still the most familiar feature of Indian village life. The Indian, perhaps, no longer cherishes any superstition regarding him, but he is reluctant to banish such a familiar evil. The Quillayutes call the bird Kah-ah-yé: and it is safe to say that fifty pairs of these Fish Crows nest within half a mile of the village of La Push. They nest, indifferently, in the saplings of the coastal thickets, or against the trunks of the larger spruces, and take little pains to escape observation. The birds are, however, becom- ing quite shy of a gun. Seeing a half dozen of them seated in the tip of a tall spruce in the open woods, I raised my fowling piece to view, whereupon THE CROW’'S FARI flew with frantic cries. Indeed it required considerable manceuvering ind an ambuscade to secure the single specimen needed \t Neah Bay the Fish Crows patrol the beach incessantly and allow ery little of the halibut fishers’ largess to float off on the tide \nd the Ohe-t pe, as the Makahs call the birds, have little feat ot the Indians, iltho they are very suspicious of a strange white man. I once saw a pretty sight on this beach: a three year old Indian girl chasing the Crows about in childish glee. The birds enjoved the frolic as much as she, and fell in THE NORTHWEST CROW. ity behind her as fast as she shooed them away in front—came within two or three feet of her, too, and made playful dashes at her chubby legs. But might I be permitted to photograph the scene at, say, fifty yards? Mit nichten! Arragh! To your tents, O Israel! In so far as this Crow consents to perform the office of scavenger, he is a useful member of society. Nor is his consumption of shell-fish a serious matter. But when we come to consider the quality and extent of his depredations upon colonies of nesting sea-birds, we find that he merits unqualified condemnation. For instance, two of us bird-men once visited the west nesting of Baird Cormorants on Flattop, to obtain photographs. As we retired down the cliff, I picked up a broken shell of a Cormorant’s egg, from which the white, or plasma, was still dripping. As we pulled away from the foot of the cliff a Crow flashed into view, lighted on the edge of a Shag’s nest, seized an egg, and bore it off rapidly into the woods above, where the clamor of expectant young soon told of the disposition that was being made of it. Immediately the marauder was back again, seized the other egg, and was off as before. All this, mind you, in a trice, before we were sufficiently out of range for the Cormorants to reach their nests again, altho they were hastening toward them. Back came the Crow, but the first nest was exhausted; the second had nothing in it; the Shags were on the remainder; moments were precious—he made a dive at a Gull’s nest, but the Gulls made a dive at him; and they too hastened to their eggs. Subsequent investigation discovered rifled egg-shells all over the island, and it was an easy matter to pick up a hatful for evidence. As he is at Flattop, so he is everywhere, an indefatigable robber of birds’ nests, a sneaking, thieving, hated, black marauder. It is my deliberate conviction that the successful rearing of a nestful of young Crows costs the lives of a hundred sea-birds. ‘The Baird Cormorant is, doubtless, the heaviest loser; and she appears to have no means of redress after the mischief is done, save to lay more eggs,—more eggs to feed more Crows, to steal more eggs, ete. 18 THE CLARK NUTCRACKER. No. 5. CLARK’S NUTCRACKER. A. O. U. No. 491. Nucifraga columbiana (Wils.). Synonyms.—CLark’s Crow. Pine Crow. Gray Crow. “Camp Rosser.” (Thru confusion with the Gray Jay, Perisoreus sp.). Description.—Adults: General plumage smoky gray, lightening on head, becoming sordid white on forehead, lores, eyelids, malar region and chin; wings glossy black, the secondaries broadly tipped with white; under tail-coverts and four outermost pairs of rectrices white, the fifth pair with outer web chiefly white and the inner web chiefly black, the remaining (central) pair of rectrices and the upper tail-coverts black; bill and feet black; iris brown. Shade of gray in plumage of adults variable—bluish ash in freshly moulted specimens, darker and browner, or irregularly whitening in worn plumage. Young like adults, but browner. Length 11.00-13.00; wing 7.00-8.00 (192); tail 4.50 (115); bill 1.60 (40.7) ; tarsus 1.45 (36.8). Female smaller than male. Recognition Marks.—Kingfisher size; gray plumage with abruptly con- trasting black-and-white of wings and tail; harsh “‘char-r” note. Nesting.—Nest: basally a platform of twigs on which ‘s massed fine strips of bark with a lining of bark and grasses, placed well out on horizontal limb of evergreen tree, 10-50 feet up. Eggs: 2-5, usually 3, pale green sparingly flecked and spotted with lavender and brown chiefly about larger end. Av. size, 1.30 x Ol (33x 23.1. Season: March 20-April 10; one brood. General Range.—Western North America in coniferous timber, from Arizona and New Mexico to Alaska; casual east of the Rockies. Range in Washington.—Of regular occurrence in the mountains thruout the State. Resident in the main but visits the foothills and lower pine-clad levels of eastern Washington at the close of the nesting season. Authorities— Corvus columbianus, Wilson, Am. Orn. iii. 1811, 29. T. C&S. Dt. Ds. J. E- Specimens.—(U. of W.). Prov. E. C. NO bird-lover can forget his first encounter with this singular Old-Bird- of-the-Mountains. Ten to one the bird brought the man up standing by a stentorian char'r’r, char'r’r, char’r’r, which led him to search wildly in his memory whether Rocs are credited with voices. If the bird was particularly concerned at the man’s intrusion, he presently revealed himself sitting rather stolidly on a high pine branch, repeating that harsh and deafening cry. The grating voice is decidedly unpleasant at close quarters, and it is quite out of keeping with the unquestioned sobriety of its grizzled owner. A company of Nutcrackers in the distance finds frequent occasion for outery, and the din is only bearable as it is softened and modified by the re-echoing walls of some pine-clad gulch, or else dissipated by the winds which sweep over the listening glaciers. THE CLARK NUTCRACKER. 19 Clark’s Nutcracker is the presiding genius of the East-side slopes and light-forested foothills, as well as of the rugged fastnesses of the central Cordilleras. His presence, during fall and winter, at the lower altitudes depends in large measure upon the pine-cone crop, since pine seeds are his staple, tho by no means his exclusive diet. This black and white and gray CLARK’S NUTCRACKER. “Crow” curiously combines the characteristics of Woodpecker and Jay as well. Like the Lewis Woodpecker, he sometimes hawks at passing insects, eats berries from bushes, or alights on the ground to glean grubs, grass- hoppers, and black crickets. In the mountains it shares with the Jays of the Perisoreus group the names “meat-bird’ and “camp-robber,” for nothing that is edible comes amiss to this bird, and instances are on record of its having invaded not only the open-air kitchen, but the tent, as well, in search of “supplies.” Of its favorite food, John Keast Lord says: “Clark’s ‘Crows’ have, like the Cross-bills, to get out the seeds from underneath the scaly coverings constituting the outward side of the fir-cone; nature has not given them 20 THE CLARK NUTCRACKER. crossed mandibles to lever open the scales, but instead, feet and claws, that serve the purpose of hands, and a powerful bill like a small crowbar. To use the crowbar to advantage the cone needs steadying, or it would snap at the stem and fall; to accomplish this one foot clasps it, and the powerful claws hold it firmly, whilst the other foot encircling the branch, supports the bird, either back downward, head downward, on its side, or upright like a woodpecker, the long clasping claws being equal to any emergency; the cone thus fixed and a firm hold maintained on the branch, the seeds are gouged out from under the scales.” These Nutcrackers are among the earliest and most hardy nesters. They are practically independent of climate, but are found during the nesting months—March, or even late in February, and early April—only where there is a local abundance of pine (or fir) seeds. They are artfully silent at this season, and the impression prevails that they have ‘“‘gone to the mountains”; or, if in the mountains already, the presence of a dozen feet of snow serves to allay the odlogist’s suspicions. The nest is a very substantial affair of twigs and bark-strips, heavily lined, as befits a cold season, and placed at any height in a pine or fir tree, without noticeable attempt at concealment. The birds take turns incubating and—again because of the cold season—are very close sitters. Three eggs are usually laid, of about the size and shape of Magpies’ eggs, but much more lightly colored. Incubation, Bendire thinks, lasts sixteen or seventeen days, and the young are fed solely on hulled pine seeds, at the first, pre- sumably, regurgitated. If the Corvine affinities of this bird were nowhere else betrayed, they might be known from the hunger cries of the young. The importunate aih, anh, anh of the expectant bantling, and the subsequent gulli, gulli, gulli of median deglutition (and boundless satisfaction) will always serve to bind the Crow, Magpie, and Nutcracker together in one compact group. When the youngsters are “ready for college,” the reserve of early spring is set aside and the hillsides are made to resound with much practice of that uncanny yell before mentioned. Family groups are gradually obliterated and, along in June, the birds of the foothills begin to retire irregularly to the higher ranges, either to rest up after the exhausting labors of the season, or to revel in midsummer gaiety with scores and hundreds of their fellows. THE PINON JAY. 21 No. 6. PINON JAY. A. O. U. No. 492. Cyanocephalus cyanocephalus (Maxim.). Synonyms.—BLvur Crow. Maximinian’s JAy. PINE Jay. Description—4du/ts: Plumage dull grayish blue, deepening on crown and nape, brightening on cheeks, paling below posteriorly, streaked and grayish white on chin, throat and chest centrally; bill and feet black; iris brown. Young birds duller, gray rather than blue, except on wings and tail. Length of adult males 11.00-12.00; wing 6.00 (154) ; tail 4.50 (114); bill 1.42 (36); tarsus 1.50 (38). Female somewhat smaller. Recognition Marks.—Robin size; blue color; crow-like aspect. Nesting.— Not supposed to nest in State. General Range.—Pifon and juniper woods of western United States; north to southern British Columbia (interior), Idaho, etc.; south to Northern Lower California, Arizona, New Mexico, and western Texas; casually along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mts. ~ Range in Washington.—One record by Capt. Bendire, Fort Simcoe, Yakima Co., June, 1881, “quite numerous.” Presumably casual at close of nesting season. Authorities.—|“Maximilian’s Nutcracker,’ Johnson, Rep. Gov. W. T. 1884 (1885), 22.] Cyanocephalus cyanocephalus (Wied), Bendire, Life Hist. N. A. 3irds, Vol. II. p. 425 (1895). Specimens.—C. CAPTAIN BENDIRE who is sole authority for the occurrence of this bird in Washington may best be allowed to speak here from his wide experience : “The Pinon Jay, locally known as ‘Nutcracker,’ ‘Maximilian’s Jay,’ ‘Blue Crow,’ and as ‘Pinonario’ by the Mexicans, is rather a common resident in suitable localities throughout the southern portions of its range, while in the northern parts it is only a summer visitor, migrating regularly. It is most abundantly found throughout the pifion and cedar-covered foothills abounding between the western slopes of the Rocky Mountains and the eastern bases of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade ranges in California, Nevada, and Oregon. “It is an eminently sociable species at all times, even during the breeding season, and is usually seen in large compact flocks, moving about from place to place in search of feeding grounds, being on the whole rather restless and erratic in its movements; you may meet with thousands in a place to-day and perhaps to-morrow you will fail to see a single one. It is rarely met with at altitudes of over 9,000 feet in summer, and scarcely ever in 22 THE PINON JAY. 4 the higher coniferous forests; its favorite haunts are the pifon-covered foothills of the minor mountain regions, the sweet and very palatable seeds of these trees furnishing its favorite food during a considerable portion of the year. In summer they feed largely on insects of all kinds, especially grasshoppers, and are quite expert in catching these on the wing; cedar and juniper berries, small seeds of various kinds, and different species of wild berries also enter largely into their bill of fare. A great deal of time is spent on the ground where they move along in compact bodies while feeding, much in the manner of Blackbirds, the rearmost birds rising from time to time, flying over the flock and alighting again in front of the main body; they are rather shy and alert while engaged in feeding. I followed a flock numbering several thousands which was feeding in the open pine forest bordering the Klamath Valley, Oregon, for more than half a mile, trying to get a shot at some of them, but in this I was unsuccessful. They would not allow me to get within range, and finally they became alarmed, took wing, and flew out of sight down the valley. On the next day, September 18, 1882, I saw a still larger flock, which revealed its presence by the noise made; these I headed off, and awaited their approach in a dense clump of small pines in which I had hidden; I had not long to wait and easily secured several specimens. On April 4, 1883, I saw another large flock feeding in the open woods, evidently on their return to their breeding grounds farther north, and by again getting in front of them I secured several fine males. These birds are said to breed in large numbers in the juniper groves near the eastern slopes of the Cascade Mountains, on the head waters of the Des Chutes River, Oregon. I have also seen them in the Yakima Valley, near old Fort Simcoe, in central Washington, in June, 1881, in-an oak opening, where they were quite numerous. Their center of abundance, however, is in the pion or nut-pine belt, which does not extend north of latitude 40°, if so far, and wherever these trees are found in large numbers the Pifion Jay can likewise be looked for with confidence. “Their call notes are quite variable; some of them are almost as harsh as the ‘chaar’ of the Clarke’s Nutcracker, others partake much of the gabble of the Magpie, and still others resemble more those of the Jays. A shrill, querulous ‘peeh, peeh,’ or “whee, whee,’ is their common call note. While feeding on the ground they kept up a constant chattering, which can be heard for quite a distance, and in this way often betray their whereabouts.” THE AMERICAN MAGPIE. 23 No. 7. AMERICAN MAGPIE. A. O. U. No. 475. Pica pica hudsonia (Sabine). Synonym.—BLAckK-BILLED MAGPIE. Description.—Adults: Lustrous black with violet, purplish, green, and bronzy iridescence, brightest on wings and tail; an elongated scapular patch pure white; lower breast, upper abdomen, flanks and sides broadly pure white; primaries extensively white on inner web; a broad band on rump with large admixture of white; tail narrowly graduated thru terminal three-fifths; bill and feet black; iris black. } owng birds lack iridescence on head and are elsewhere duller; relative length of tail sure index of age in juvenile specimens. Length of adults 15.00-20.00, of which tail 8.00-12.00 (Av. 265); wing 7.85 (200); bill I.35 (35-); tarsus 1.85 (47). Recognition Marks.—Black-and-white plumage with long tail unmistakable. Nesting.—Nest: normally a large sphere of interlaced sticks, ‘‘as big as a bushel basket,” placed 5-40 feet high in willow, aspen, grease-wood or pine. The nest proper is a contained hemisphere of mud 8-10 inches across inside, and with walls 1-2 inches in thickness, carefully lined for half its depth with twigs sur- mounted by a mat of fine rootlets. Eggs: 7 or 8, rarely 10, pale grayish green, quite uniformly freckled and spotted with olive green or olive brown. Occasion- ally spots nearly confluent in heavy ring about larger end, in which case remainder of egg likely to be less heavily marked than usual. Shape variable, rounded ovate to elongate ovate. Av. size, 1.20x .88 (30.5 x 22.3). Season: March 20- May 1; one brood. General Range.—Western North America chiefly in treeless or sparsely timbered areas from southern Arizona, New Mexico, and western Texas north to northwestern Alaska. Straggles eastward to west shore of Hudson Bay, and occurs casually in North Central States, Nebraska, etc. Replaced in California west of the Sierras by Pica nuttalli. Range in Washington.—Confined to East-side during breeding season, where of nearly universal distribution. Disappears along east slope of Cascades and does not deeply penetrate the mountain valleys. Migrates regularly but sparingly thru mountain passes to West-side at close of breeding season. . Authorities.—[lLewis and Clark, Hist. Ex. (1814) Ed. Biddle: Coues, Vol. II. p. 185.] Pica hudsonica Bonap., Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. pt. II. (7858); 578. I. C&S. Rh. Dt. Ra. D2. Sst. Ss2. J. B. E. Specimens.—(U. of W.) P. Prov. B. E. BN. HERE is another of those rascals in feathers who keep one alternately grumbling and admiring. As an abstract proposition one would not stake a sou marquee on the virtue of a Magpie; but taken in the concrete, with a sly wink and a saucy tilt of the tail, one will rise to his feet, excitedly shouting, “Go it, Jackity,”” and place all his earnings on this pie-bald steed in the race for avian honors. It is impossible to exaggerate this curious contradiction in Magpie nature, and in our resulting attitude towards it. It is much the same with the mischievous small boy. He has surpassed the THE AMERICAN MAGPTE bounds of legitimate naughtiness, and we take him on the parental knee for well-deserved correction. But the saucy culprit manages to steal a roguish glance at us,—a glance which challenges the remembrance of our own boyish pranks, and bids us ask what difference it will make twenty years after; and it is all off with discipline for that occasion The Magpie is indisputably a wretch, a miscreant, a cunning thief, a heartless marauder, a brigand bold—Oh, call him what you will! But, withal, he is such a picturesque villain, that as often as you are stirred with righteous indignation and impelled to punitive slaughter, you fall to wonder ing if your commission as avenger is properly countersigned, and—shirk the task outright The cattle men have it in for him, because the persecutions of the Magpie sometimes prevent scars made by the branding iron from healing; and cases are known in which young stock has died because of malignant sores resulting This is, of course, a grave misdemeanor ; but when the use of fences shall have fully displaced the present custom of branding, we shall probably hear nm more of it Beyond this it is indisputably true that Magpies are professional nest robbers. At times they organize systematic searching parties, and advance PIT \ R ASEFWOO bho Allan Wroo\s- It 26 THE AMERICAN MAGPE. thru the sage-brush, poking, prying, spying, and devouring, with the ruth- lessness and precision of a pestilence. Not only eggs but young birds are appropriated. I once saw a Magpie seize a half-grown Meadowlark from Its nest, carry it to its own domicile, and parcel it out among its clamoring brood Then, in spite of the best defense the agonized parents could i institute, it calm ly returned and eed selected another Sticks and in 3 MAGPIE'S NEST FROM ABOVI ! the Author man merely deferred the doom of the remaining larks The Magpie was not likely to forget the whereabouts of such easy meat Nor is such a connoisseur of eggs likely to overlook the opportunities afforded by a poultry yard He becomes an adept at purloining eggs, and can make off with his booty with astonishing ease. One early morning, seeing a Magpie fiv over the corral with something large and white in his bill, and believing that he had alighted not far beyond, I followed quickly 4 itened him from a large hen’s egg, which bore externally the marks THE AMERICAN MAGPIE. 27, of the bird’s bill, but which was unpierced. Of course the only remedy for such a habit is the shot-gun. To say that Magpies are garrulous would be as trite as to say hens cackle, and the adjective could not be better defined than “talking like a Magpie.” The Magpie is the symbol of loquacity. ‘The very type in which this is printed is small pica; that is small Magpie. Much of this bird’s conversation is undoubtedly unfit for print, but it has always the merit of vivacity. A party of Magpies will keep up a running commentary on current events, now facetious, now vehement, as they move about; while a comparative cessation of the racket means, as likely as not, that some favorite raconteur is holding forth, and that there will be an explosion of riotous laughter when his tale is done. ‘The pie, like Nero, aspires to song; but no sycophant will be found to praise him, for he intersperses his more tuneful musings with chacks and barks and harsh interjections which betray a disordered taste. In modulation and quality, however, the notes sometimes verge upon the human; and it is well known that Magpies can be instructed until they acquire a handsome repertoire of speech. In order that their double quartet of youngsters may be lined up for the egg harvest, the Magpies take an early start at home building. April is the nesting month, but I have two records for March 30th,—one of five eges at Chelan, and one of eight in Yakima County. In the latter instance the first egg must have been deposited not later than March 18th. And because the season affords him no protection, the Magpie resorts to two expedients in nest building in lieu of concealment:-he first seeks retirement, the depths of some lonesome swamp, an unfrequented draw, or wooded spring, in the foothills, and then he erects a castle which would do credit to a feudal baron. The nest is a ball of interlacing sticks set about a hollow half-sphere of dried mud. The amount of labor expended upon one of these structures is prodigious. ‘The greasewood nest shown in the accompany- ing cut is three feet deep and two feet thru, and the component sticks are so firmly interwoven that no ordinary agency, short of the human hand, can effect an entrance. ‘The bird enters thru an obscure passage in one side, and, if surprised upon the nest, has always a way of escape planned thru the opposite wall. The mud cup is carefully shaped with walls an inch or two in thickness, a total breadth of eight or ten inches, and a like depth. In the best construction this cavity is filled to a depth of three or four inches with a loose mat of fine twigs of a uniform size. Upon this in turn is placed a coiled mattress of fine, clean rootlets, the whole affording a very sanitary arrangement. Another fortress, of single construction, was four feet deep and three and a half feet thru; and that, too, after making liberal allowance for chance projections. The component sticks measure up to three feet in length and es ( { f ef ad re cK Lite eal I i Ta init peless eC ¢ rue es e ere upon the ruins I e ol The enemen ph togra ( Home Island ~ l ri¢ est it t ple b t pper third | dome thie ce pl px } na cs SC reer ‘I 1 I ) | | { med ec ¢ Ologist is very tond Ma Ss, He S j THERE AMERICAN MAGPIE. 29 This historic pile is in marked contrast to one sighted in a willow on the banks of Crab Creek near Odessa. My attention was attracted to the spot by a scuffle, which took place between a, Magpie and a pair of Kingbirds; and when I started to examine the nest, I was in honest doubt whether it might not belong to the Kingbirds. The foundation was of mud, but this came near constituting the outside of the nest instead of the inside. ‘The action of the wind upon the willows had compressed the mud bowl to a boat- shaped receptacle wherein lay five brown beauties, unmistakable Magpies’ eggs. There was a copious lining of rootlets, and a light half-cover of thorn twigs; but the whole structure was not over a foot in diameter and scarcely that in depth. Poe a aa, 3 SF. a] 4 Magpies, like Blue Jays, are discreetly quiet in nesting time, and especially so if they have attempt- ed to nest in the vicinity of a farm- house. When driven to the hills by persecution they accept any shelter, and will nest in grease- wood, sage-brush, or even on the ground. Arbors of clematis (cle- matis ligusticifolia) of- fer occasional conceal- ment, but thornapples (Crategus columbian- um, ete.) afford the safest retreat. A Mag- pie snugly ensconced Taken near Spokane in a thornapple fortress >hoto by Fred S. Merrill. wees : : FNS si may well bid defiance REO T AGH -OUNG TE as NGF eh MS a | Gree: to any retributive agen- cy short of man. Among several scores of nests I never saw one in a pine tree in the Yakima country, yet these are freely utilized in Chelan, Okanogan, and Spokane Counties. Indeed, in these latter localities there is a suspicion of dawning preference for the tree-tops and difficult climbs. On the Columbia River I once found a family of Magpies occupying the basement of a huge 30 THE AMERICAN MAGPIE. Osprey’s nest, and had reason to believe that the thrifty pies made efficient, if unwelcome, janitors. Young Magpies are unsightly when hatched,—“worse than naked,” and repulsive to a degree equaled only by young Cormorants. Hideous as they unquestionably are, the devoted parents declare them angels, and are ready to back their opinions with most raucous vociferations. With the possible exception of Herons, who are plebes anyhow, Magpies are the most abusive and profane of birds. When a nest of young birds is threatened, they not only express such reasonable anxiety as any parent might feel, but they denounce, upbraid, anathematize, and vilify the intruder, and decry his lineage from Adam down. They show the ingenuity of Orientals in inventing oppro- brious epithets, and when these run dry, they fall to tearing at the leaves, the twigs, the branches, or even light on the ground and rip up the soil with their beaks, in the mad extremity of their rage. A pair with whom I experimented near Wallula rather fell into the humor of the thing. The Magpie is ever a wag, and these must have known that repeated visits could mean no harm. Nevertheless, as often as I rattled the nest from my favorite perch on the willow tree, the old pies opened fresh vials of wrath and emptied their contents upon my devoted head. When mere utterance became inadequate, the male bird fell to hewing at the end of a broken branch in most eloquent indignation. He wore this down four inches in the course of my three visits. Once, when my attention was diverted, he took a sly crack at my outstretched fingers, which were hastily withdrawn; and, believe me, we both laughed. The Black-billed Magpie winters practically thruout its breeding range, but it also indulges in irregular migratory movements, which in Washington take the form of excursions to the coast. While never common on Puget Sound, they are not unlikely to occur anywhere here in the fall of the year, and are almost certain to be found somewhere about the southern prairies. They return early in spring by way of the major passes, and are not again seen within the heavily timbered areas during the breeding season. Mr. D. E. Brown, then of Glacier, on the north fork of the Nooksack River, records under date of March 4, 1905, the appearance of several bands of Magpies passing eastward at a considerable height, perhaps something between three and five thousand feet. He says they were unrecognizable until glasses were trained on them, and he thinks he must have seen at least fifty birds, with chances for many more to have passed unobserved. East or west the Magpie becomes a pensioner of the slaughter house in winter, and his fondness for meat has often proved his undoing in the cattle country. As a scavenger his services are not inconsiderable. The only trouble is, as has been said, that he sometimes kills his own meat. Volumes could be written of the Magpie as a pet. - He is a brainy chap THE CALIFORNIA JAY. 31 as well as a wag, and infinitely more interesting than a stupid parrot. Mis- chief is his special forte: the untying of shoe-strings, the investigation of cavities, the secreting of spoons, and the aimless abstraction of gold teeth are his unending delight. Once when the writer was shelling seed peas in the garden, a spoiled “Jackity” assayed to fill his (the man’s) ears with these innocent pellets; and when he discovered a rent in the knee of the man’s trousers, he fairly chortled, “Well; I see myself busy for a week filling that hole!” Cage life is irksome for bird or beast; but, if we must be amused, and, above all, if we feel called upon to pass adverse judgment upon this gifted bundle of contradictions, as he exists in a state of nature, let our harshest sentence be sociable confinement with occasional freedom on parole. A bird in the cage is worth two in the obituary columns. No. 8. CALIFORNIA JAY. A. O. U. No. 481. Aphelocoma californica (Vigors). Description.—Adults: In general blue, changing to brownish gray on back (scapulars and interscapulars), whitening variously on underparts; crown, hind neck and sides of neck dull cobalt blue, nearly uniform; wings, tail, and upper tail-coverts dull azure blue; cheeks and auriculars cobalt blue and dusky; chin, throat, and chest, centrally, white, the last-named with admixture of blue in streaks, and passing into the clear blue of its sides; breast sordid gray, passing into dull white of remaining underparts; shorter under tail-coverts pure white, the longer ones tinged with pale blue; bill and feet black; iris brown. In young birds the blue of adults is supplanted by mouse-gray on head and lower neck, rump, etc., save that crown is tinged with blue; the gray of back is of a deeper shade; the underparts are white, save for light brownish wash across breast and sides. Length of adult males 11.50-12.25; wing 5.00 (127); tail 5.60 (143); bill 1.00 (25.4) ; tarsus 1.60 (41). Females slightly smaller. Recognition Marks.—Robin size; blue coloration without crest; whitish underparts. Nesting.—Nest; a bed of small twigs without mud and heavily lined with fine dead grass; 8 inches across outside by 314 in depth—thus much smaller and lighter than that of the Steller Jay—placed at moderate elevation in tree or bush in thicket near water. Eggs: 3-6, usually 4 or 5, deep green of varying shades, spotted with reddish browns. Av. size, 1.11 x .82 (28.2 x 20.8). Season: first week in May; one brood. General Range.—Pacific Coast district of United States, including eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada and the Cascade Range in Oregon, north to south- western Washington. 32 THE CALIFORNIA JAW. Range in Washington.—(f limited but regular occurrence along the banks of the Columbia west of the Cascades, Resident. Authorities.—| ‘California Jay,’ Johnson Rep. Gov. W. T. 1884 (1885), 22]. | Belding, Land Birds Pac. Dist. (1890) p. 111] Aphelocoma californica, Law- rence, Auk, July, 1892, p. 301 Specimens.—C. THRU the western part of Oregon the breeding limits of the California Jay do not extend as far north as the Columbia River [ have never known of this species nesting about Portland, yet thirty miles south and southwest it 1s not at all uncommon Thru the Willam ette Valley, one meets this _ bird about as often as the Steller Jay The habits of the two jays are much the same, yet the birds are easily distinguished — by their dress, the California Jay having more re semblance to the Blue Jay of the lacking the crest, while the Steller Jay has a dark blue and blackish coat with the long crest \ccording = t popular opu the California ] s a bird f ba THE STELLER JAY. = other birds and feasting on their eggs. This is not true, altho occasionally a Jay will destroy the home of another bird. In Oregon I have often seen this bird feeding on wheat about the edge of the fields after the grain has been cut. Fruit, grain, grasshoppers and other insects make up a large part of his food. Several years ago I saw a small flock of California Jays along the Columbia River in the dead of winter. During the nesting season the jay is too quiet to show his real character. During the autumn and winter he throws off all restraint, picks up a few mates and goes wandering about from place to place in search of food. The bold and boisterous squawk of the Blue Jay always comes to my ear as a welcome and fitting note to relieve the cold quiet of the winter woods. One day I was watching several English Sparrows that were feeding on the ground under an oak when a pair of California Jays came flying thru the trees. With a loud squawk one swooped down, with his wings and tail spread and his feathers puffed out as much as possible, evidently expecting to scare the sparrows. He dropped right in their midst with a screech which plainly said, “Get out of here or I'll eat you up alive!” The bluff might have worked with any bird except an Englisher. The Sparrows sputtered in contempt and were ready to fight but the Jay’s attitude changed in a second. He took on an air of meekness and unconcern and hopped off looking industriously in the grass for something he had no idea of finding. I thought it a good touch of Jay character. Wiiiam L. FINLEY. No. 9. STELLER’S JAY. A. O. U. No. 478. Cyanocitta stelleri (Gmelin). Synonyms.—“Bivur Jay.” “Jayeprrp.” Description.—Adults: Head and neck all around, and back, sooty black, touched with streaks of cerulean blue on forehead, and pale gray on chin and throat, this color passing insensibly into dull blue on breast and rump and richer blue on wings and tail; terminal portion of tail and wings crossed with fine black bars, sharply on secondaries and tertials, faintly or not at all on greater coverts. Bill and feet black; iris brown. Young birds are more extensively sooty, and wing-bars are faint or wanting. Length of adults about 12.00; wing 5.90 (150) ; tail 5.43 (138) ; bill 1.18 (30) ; tarsus 1.80 (46). ; Recognition Marks.—Robin size; harsh notes; blue and black coloration unmistakable. 34 THE STELLER JAY. Nesting.—Nest: a bulky mass of fine twigs thickly plastered centrally with mud and lined with fine rootlets, placed 6-30 feet high in evergreen tree of thicket, or near edge of clearing. Eggs: 3-5, usually 4, pale bluish green, uniformly but moderately spotted with olive brown and pale rufous and with numerous “‘shell- markings” of lavender. Av. size, 1.23 x .9O (31.2 x 22.8). Season: April 20- May 10; one brood. General Range.—North Pacific Coast district from Gray’s Harbor and Puget Sound north to Cook’s Inlet, except Prince of Wales Island and the Queen Charlotte group (where displaced by C. s. carlotte). Range in Washington.—Entire western portion from summit of Cascades, shading into C. s. carbonacea along north bank of the Columbia. Resident. Authorities.—? Cyanura stellert Swains., Orn. Com., Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. VII. 1837, 193. Cyanocitta stelleri, Newberry, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. VI. pt. [V. 1857, p. 85. T.. C&S: L?; Rh. Ra. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. E. B. BN. MISCHIEF and the “Blue Jay” are synonymous. Alert, restless, saucy, inquisitive, and provoking, yet always interesting, this handsome brigand keeps his human critics in a perpetual see-saw between wrath and admiration. As a sprightly piece of Nature, the Steller Jay is an unqualified success. As the hero-subject of a guessing contest he is without a peer, for one never knows what he is doing until he has done it, and none may predict what he will do next. The pioneers are especially bitter against him, and they are unanimous in accusing the bird of malicious destructiveness in the gardens, which are dearer than the apple of the eye during the first years of wilderness life. The bird will eat anything, and so, tiring of bugs and slugs, are not averse to trying corn, cabbage leaves, or, best of all, potatoes. They have observed the tedious operation of the gardener in planting, and know precisely where the coveted tubers lie. Bright and early the following morning they slip to the edge of the clearing, post one of their number as lookout, then silently deploy upon their ghoulish task. If they weary of potatoes, sprouting peas or corn will do. Or perhaps there may be something interesting at the base of this young tomato plant. And when the irate farmer appears upon the scene, the marauders retire to the forest shrieking with laughter at the discomfitted swain. Ay! there's the rub! We may endure injury but not insult. Bang! Bang! As a connoisseur of birds’ eggs, too, the Steller Jay enjoys a bad eminence. ‘The sufferers in this case are chiefly the lesser song birds; but no eggs whatever are exempt from his covetous glance, if left unguarded. The Jay has become especially proficient in the discovery and sacking of Bush-tits’ nests. Mr. D. E. Brown assures me that he has found as high as fifteen nests of this bird in a single swamp, all gutted by Jays. When it is remembered that these busy little workers make one of the handsomest nests in the world, the shame of this piracy gets upon the nerves. The investigation of Tits’ nests has something of the fascination of the gaming table for the Jay, since THE STELLER JAY. 35 he never knows what the wonder pouches may contain, until he has ripped a hole in the side and inserted his piratical beak. The dense forests of Puget Sound are not so well patrolled by these feathered grafters as are the forests of the East by the true Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata). But then our bird has the advantage of denser cover, and we do not know how often we have been scrutinized or shadowed. Upon discovery the Steller Jay sets up a great outcry and makes off thru the thickets shrieking lustily. A favorite method of retreat is to flit up into the lower branches of a fir tree and, keeping close to the trunk, to ascend the succeeding limbs as by a spiral staircase. The bird, indeed, takes a childish delight in this mad exercise, and no sooner does he quit one tree-top than he dashes down to a neighboring tree to run another frenzied gamut. Owls have abundant cover in western Washington, but should one of them be startled by day, the Steller blue-coat is the first to note the villain’s flight. The alarm is sounded and an animated pursuit begins. When the Owl is brought to bay, the deafening objurgation of the Jays is not the least indignity which he is made to suffer. The Jay, in fact, seeks to make the world forget his own offenses by heaping obloquy upon this blinking sinner. The notes of the Steller Jay are harsh and expletive to a degree. Shaack, shaack, shaack is a common (and most exasperating) form; or, by a little stretch of the imagination one may hear say, jay, jay. A mellow klook, klook, klook sometimes varies the rasping imprecations and serves to remind one that the Jay is cousin to the Crow. Other and minor notes there are for the lesser and rarer emotions, and some of these not unmusical. Very rarely the bird attempts song, and succeeds in producing a medley which quite satisfies her that he could if he would. C. stelleri, like C. cristata again, is something of a mimic. ‘The notes of the Western Red-tail (Buteo borealis calurus) and other hawks are reproduced with especial fidelity. For such an effort the Jay conceals himself in the depths of a large-leafed maple or in a fir thicket, and his sole object appears to be that of terrorizing the neighboring song-birds. One such I heard holding forth from a shade tree on the Asylum grounds at Steilacoom. Uncanny sounds are, of course, not unknown here, but an exploratory pebble served to unmask the cheat, and drove forth a very much chastened Blue Jay before a company of applauding Juncoes. It is well known that the gentleman burglar takes a conscientious pride in the safety and welfare of his own home. Nothing shall molest his dear ones. The Jay becomes secretive and silent as the time for nest-building approaches. The nest is well concealed in a dense thicket of fir saplings, or else set at various heights in the larger fir trees. If one but looks at it before the complement of eggs is laid the locality is deserted forthwith. If, however, the enterprise is irretrievably launched, the birds take care not to be seen in 36 DHE GRINNELL JAYS the vicinity of their nest until they are certain of its discovery, in which case they call heaven and earth to witness that the man is a monster of iniquity, and that he is plotting against the innocent. In our experience, Steller’s Jay is not, as has been sometimes reported, a bird of the mountains. To be sure, it may be found in the mountain valleys, but if so it is practically confined to them. The bird, is, however, ubiquitous thruout the lowlying countries of Puget Sound, Gray’s Harbor, and adjacent regions, giving way only upon the south to the dubious Grinnell Jay (Sas carbonacea). No. 10. GRINNELL’S JAY. A. O. U. No. 478e. Cyanocitta stelleri carbonacea J. Grinnell. Synonyms.—“Buiue Jay.” Coast Jay (A. O. U.). Description.—‘‘Similar to C. s. stelleri, but paler thruout, and averaging slightly smaller; color of head very nearly as in C. s. stelleri, but averaging browner or more sooty, the forehead always conspicuously streaked with blue, and throat more extensively or uniformly pale grayish; back and foreneck much paler, slaty brown or brownish slate, instead of deep sooty; blue of rump, upper tail-coverts, and under parts of body light dull cerulean or verditer blue, advanc- ing more over chest, where more abruptly defined against the sooty or brownish slate color of foreneck” (Ridgway). Adult males: wing 6.10 (150.5); tail 5.51 (140) ; bill 1.15 (29.1); tarsus 1.75 (44.5). General Range.—Pacific Coast district from Monterey county, California, north to Columbia River. Range in Washington.—Has only theoretical status in State, but specimens taken along north banks of Columbia would appear to belong here. Authorities.—? ( ory us stelleri, Nuttall, Man. Orn. U. S. and Can. I. 1832, 229 (“Columbia River’). ? Orn, Com. Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. VII. 1837, 193. C. s. frontalis, R. H. Lawrence, Auk XVII. Oct. 1892, p. 355 (Gray's Harbor). C. s. carbonacea Grinnell, Ridgway, Birds of No. and Mid. Am. Vol. IIT. p. 354 (footnote). L. Kb. ORNITHOLOGY is the furthest refined of the systematic sciences. So zealous have been her devotees and so sagacious her high priests, that no shade of difference in size, form or hue of a bird is allowed to pass unnoticed, or its owner unnamed. It is unquestionably annoying to the novice to be confronted with such subtleties, and the recognition of subspecies in the vernacular names of our birds is of doubtful wisdom; but the fashion is set and we will all be foolish together—so that none may laugh. The normal range of Grinnell’s Jay, as defined, extends northward to the ‘THE BLACK-HEADED JAY. 37 Columbia River; and since the district lying between the Columbia and Puget Sound presents intergrades between C. stelleri and C. s. carbonacea, obviously, those Jays which inhabit the southern portion of this debatable ground are better entitled to be called carbonacea than stellert. No. 11. BLACK-HEADED JAY. A. O. U. No. 478c. Cyanocitta stelleri annectens (Baird). Synonyms.—*Biur Jay.” Pine Jay. Mounrain Jay. Description.—Adults: Similar to C. stelleri, but marked with a small lengthened white spot over eye; streaks on forehead (when present) paler blue or whitish; streaks on chin and upper throat whiter and more distinct; blue areas slightly paler and rather more greenish in tone. Size indistinguishable. Recognition Marks.—As in C. stelleri. White spot over eye distinctive. Nesting.—As in C. stelleri. General Range.—Eastern British Columbia and the northern Rocky Moun- tains, south to Wahsatch Range in Utah, west to eastern slopes of Cascade Range in Washington and Oregon. Range in Washington.—Forests of eastern Washington, shading into typical stelleri in Cascade Range. Nearly confined to pine timber. Authorities—Cyanocitta stelleri annectens, Brewster, Bull. Nutt. Orn. Globe Willie mes242205 9 (C&S2) e292 Je THERE is no such difference of plumage between C. stelleri and C. s. annectens as is suggested by the name ‘‘Black-headed” ; but in endeavoring to mark eight shades of difference between tweedledum and tweedledee within the limits of a single species, we are naturally pretty hard put to it for appropriate names. Annectens marks the annexion, or welding together, of two branching lines in the C. stelleri group. It is the head of the wish-bone, whose divergent arms run down the Sierras to Lower California and along the Rockies to Guatamala respectively. With a hypothetical center of distribution somewhere in southeastern British Columbia, this subspecies inosculates with stelleri“in the mountains of that province, and is roughly separated from the western stock by the central ridge of the Cascades, in Washington. Black-headed Jays in Washington are normally confined to the limits of coniferous timber, being therefore most abundant in the northern portion, in the Blue Mountains, and along the eastern slopes of the Cascades. We have, however, like Bendire, discovered them on occasion skulking in the 38 THE WHITE-HEADED yay. willows along creek bottoms some twenty miles from pine timber. On the other hand, they do not assert, with the Gray Jays and Clark Crows, the right to range the mountain heights: but are quite content to maintain their unholy inquisition amidst the groves and thickets of the valley floors. They are, perhaps, not so noisy as the Steller Jays, being less confident of their cover; and their notes are rather more musical (breath of pines is better than fog for the voice) ; but for the rest they are the same vivacious, intrepid, resourceful mischief-makers as their kin-folk everywhere. No. 12. WHITE-HEADED JAY. A. O. U. No. 484a. Perisoreus canadensis capitalis Ridgw. Synonyms.—Rocky Mountain Jay. “CAnapa” Jay. WHuiIskey JACK. WisskAcHon, CAMp Ropper. Moose-pirp. Meat HAwKk. MEAatT-BIrp, Description.—Adu/ts: General color plumbeous ash lightening below ; whiole head white save space about and behind eye connected with broad nuchal patch of slaty gray; wings and tail blackish overlaid with silver gray; tail tipped with white and wings more or less edged with the same. Bill and feet black; iris brown. Young birds much darker and more uniform in coloration than adults— slaty gray to sooty slate with lighter crown and some whitish edging on under- parts. Length 12.00-13.00; wing 6.00 (152); tail 5.75 (145); bill 82 (21); tarsus 1.38 (35). Recognition Marks.—Robin size; slaty gray coloration. White of head with its abruptly defined patch of slate on hind neck distinctive as compared with related species of the genus Perisoreus. Nesting.—Has not been reported for Washington but bird undoubtedly breeds in the Kalispell range. Nest: in coniferous tree, a large compacted mass of the softest and warmest substances,—twigs for a foundation, then grasses, abundant moss, plant-down and feathers. Eggs: 3-5, usually 4, grayish white, spotted and blotched with brown having a tinge of purplish. Av. size 1.15 x .85 (29.2 x 21.6). Season: Feb.-April; one brood. General Range.—Higher ranges of the Rocky Mountain district from British Columbia to Arizona. Range in Washington.—Mountains of northeastern corner of State and (probably) the Blue Mountains. Authorities.—[‘“White-headed Jay,’ Johnson, Rep. Gov. W. T., 1884 (1885) 22.] Ridgway, Birds of North and Middle America, Vol. ITI. p. 371, (“Sinzoknoteen Depot, etc.”’). THE casual observer, camping first on Calispell Peak in Stevens County, and later on Mt. Stuart, in southern Chelan County, might fail to note any THE WHITH-HEADED JAY. 39 difference in the soberly-dressed Jays, who are the self-appointed overseers of camp economics. For while the birds of the two localities really represent two species, the resemblance in general appearance and behavior is so close as to be virtually negligible afield. Of this bird in Colorado, Mr. Frank M. Drew has observed*: autumn when on his first tour of inspection around the house he hops along “ec In in a curious sidelong manner, just like a school-girl in a slow hurry. White- headed, grave, and sedate, he seems a very paragon of propriety, and if you Taken near Spokane. WHITE-HEADED JAY Photo by W. H. Wright appear to be a suitable personage, he will be apt to give you a bit of advice. Becoming confidential he sputters out a lot of nonsense in a manner which causes you to think him a veritable ‘Whisky Jack’; yet, whenever he is disposed, a more bland, mind-his-own-business-appearing bird will be hard to find, as will also be many small articles around camp after one of his visits, for his whimsical brain has a great fancy for anything which may be valuable to you, but perfectly useless to him.” a. Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, Vol. VIL, p. 140. 40 THE OREGON JAY. © No. 13. OREGON JAY. A. O. U. No. 485. Perisoreus obscurus (Ridgway). Synonyms.—CAmp Rosser. Meat Birp. Deer Hunter. Description.—Adults: In general upperparts deep brownish gray; under- parts white tinged with brownish; forehead and nasal plumules most nearly clear white; chin, throat, cheeks, auriculars, and obscure band around neck white more or less tinged with brownish; crown and nape sooty brown, nearly black; feathers of back with white shafts more or less exposed ; wings and tail drab gray, the former with whitish edging on middle and greater coverts and tertials. Bill and feet black; iris brown. Young birds are nearly uniform sooty brown lighten- ing below. Length 10.00-11.00; wing 5.30 (135); tail 5.00 (127); bill .71 (18); tarsus 1.30 (33). Recognition Marks.—Robin size; brownish gray coloration, familiar, fear- less ways. Not certainly distinguishable afield from the next form. Nesting.—Nest: a bulky compacted structure of twigs, plant-fibers and tree- moss with warm lining of fine mosses and feathers, placed well up in fir tree. Eggs: 4 or 5, light gray or pale greenish gray spotted with grayish brown and dull lavender. Av. size 1.04 x .79 (26.4x.20). Season; Feb.-April; one brood. General Range.—Pacific Coast district from Humboldt county, California, north to Vancouver Island. Imperfectly made out as regards following form. Range in Washington.—Probably the Olympic Mountains -and irregularly thru the heavier forests of southwestern Washington. Authorities.—P. canadensis Bonap. Baird, Rep. Pac. RR. Surv. IX. pt. IT. 1858, 591 part. Ridgway, Bull. Essex Inst. V. Nov. 1873, 194. (T) C&S. L'. Rh. Ra. B. E(?). Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. E. C. THE relative distribution of the Oregon Jay and the more recently dis- tinguished Gray Jay is still very imperfectly understood. It would appear probable that this form is the bird of the rainy district, including all lowlands of western Washington, the Olympic Mountains, and the western slopes of the Cascades, and that it gives place to P. 0. griseus not only upon the heights and eastern slopes of the Cascades, but in the deep valleys which penetrate these mountains from the west. Certainly it is the Oregon Jay which abounds in the Olympic Mountains, and among the dense spruce forests of the adjoining coasts. While the bird is more abundant on the lowlands in winter, the prevalent opinion that the Oregon Jay is exclusively a bird of the mountains is probably incorrect. Altho bold enough where undisturbed, the birds soon learn caution; and their nests have THE, GRAY JAY. 41 been found near Renton where their presence during the breeding season would otherwise have gone unsuspected. The depths of the forest have no terrors for this quiet ghost, and there are other reasons besides color why he remains the obscure one. No. 14. GRAY TAY. A. O. U. No. 485a. Perisoreus obscurus griseus Ridgw. Synonyms.—Camp Rosser, etc. Description.— ‘Similar to P. 0. obscurus, but decidedly larger (except feet), and coloration much grayer; back, etc., deep mouse gray, instead of brown, remiges and tail between gray (No. 6) and smoke gray, instead of drab gray, and under parts grayish white instead of brownish white.” ( Ridgway). Length (Av. of three Glacier specimens) 11.16 (283.5); wing 5.82 (147.6); tail 5.48 (1g9%))2 bille75 (oO) itarsus25)(30-7))). General Range.—Central mountain ranges of central California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Range in Washington.—Thruout the Cascade Mountains and irregularly along their lower slopes west (?) to tidewater. Authorities.—? P. canadensis Bonap., Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv., Vol. IX, pt. II, 1858, p. 591 (Cascade Mts. W. T.). Ridgway, Auk, Vol. XVI., July, 1899, 225. Kk. ? THE “Camp-Robber” appears promptly as interested neighbor and smell-feast before all who invade the precincts of the mountains. The hunter, the trapper, the prospector, the timber cruiser, the mere camper-out, all know him, and they speak well or ill of him according to their kind. The Gray Jay appears to have forsworn the craftiness of his race, and he wins by an exhibition of artless simplicity, rather than by wiles. The bird is mildly curious and hungry—oh, very hungry—but this is Arcadia, and the shepherds draw nigh with never a doubt of their welcome. There is a childlike insouciance about the way in which the bird annexes a piece of frizzled bacon, humbly intended for the man. “ ‘Shoo,’ did you say? Why, what do you mean? Can’t I have it?’ And the bird retires before a flying chip, baffled and injured by such a manifest token of ill-breeding. He complains mildly to his fellows. ‘They discuss the question in gentle zwhews; generously con- clude you didn’t mean it, and return unabashed to the quest. Hunger is the chief characteristic of these docile birds, and no potential food is refused, nuts, acorns, insects, berries, or even, as a last resort, the buds of trees. Meat of any sort has an especial attraction to them; and they are the despair of the trapper because of their propensity for stealing bait. 42 THE GRAY JAY. The hunter knows them for arch sycophants, and he is occasionally able t trace a wounded deer, or to locate a carcass by the movements of these expectant heirs. Says Mr. A. W. Anthony*: “While dressing deer in the thick timber I have been almost covered with Jays flying down from the neighboring trees. They would settle on my back, head, or shoulders, tugging and pulling at each loose shred of my coat until one would think that their only object was to help me in all ways possible.” In the higher latitudes “Whisky Jack,” in spite of carefully secreted stores, often becomes very emaciated in winter, a mere bunch of bones and_ feathers, no heavier than a Red poll. While the Jays of our kindlier clime do not feel so keenly the belly pinch of winter, they have the same thrifty hab its as their northern kinfolk Food is never refused, and a well - stuffed speci men will still carry grub from camp and secrete it in bark crevice or hollow, against the unknown hour of need \ BACHELOR'S PET I have never heard the Gray Jay titter more than a soft cooing whee ew repeated at random; but Bendire credits it with a near approach to song”; and Mrs. Bailey says of the Jays on Mr. Hood*: “Their notes were pleasantly varied. One call was remarkably like the chirp of a robin. Another of the common- est was a weak and rather complaining cry repeated several times \ sharply contrasting one was a pure clear whistle of one note followed by a three-syllabled call something like Ka-wé-ah. The regular rallying ery was still different, a loud and striking two-syllabled ka-zwhee.” The eggs of the Gray Jay have not yet been reported from this State, but it is known that the bird builds a very substantial nest of twigs, grasses, plant fibre, and mosses without mud, and that it provides a heavy lining of ‘THE COWBIRD. — . 43 soft gray mosses for the eggs. The nest is usually well concealed in a fir tree, and may be placed at any height from ten or fifteen feet upward, altho usually at sixty or eighty feet. Only one brood is reared in a season, and family groups hunt together until late in the summer. No. 15. COWBIRD. A. O. U. No. 495. Molothrus ater (Bodd.). Synonyms.—Cow BLACKBIRD. CUCKOLD. Description—Adult male: Head and neck wood-, seal-, or coffee-brown (variable) ; remaining plumage black with metallic greenish or bluish iridescence. Female: Dark grayish brown, showing slight greenish reflections, darkest on wings and tail, lightening on breast and throat. Young in first plumage: Like female but lighter below and more or less streaky ; above somewhat mottled by buffy edgings of feathers. The young males present a striking appearance when they are assuming the adult black, on the installment plan, by chunks and blotches. Length 7.50-8.00 (190.5-203.2); wing 4.40 (111.8); tail 3.00-3.40 (76.2-86.4) ; bill .65 (16.5); tarsus .95-1.10 (24.1-27.9). Female, length, wing, and tail one-half inch less. Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; brown head and black body of male; brown of female. Nesting.—The Cowbird invariably deposits her eggs in the nests of other birds. Eggs: 1 or 2, rarely 3 or 4, with a single hostess, white, often faintly tinged with bluish or greenish, evenly speckled with cinnamon, brown or umber. Ay. size, .85 x .65 (21.6x 16.5), but quite variable. Season: April-June. General Range.—United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific, north into southern British America, south in winter, into Mexico. Range in Washington.—Of limited but regular occurrence east of the Cascades, increasing; rare or casual in western Washington. Summer resident. Authorities.—Bendire, Life Histories of N. A. Birds, Vol. II., p. 434. ID) IDES SEE Io dee Be Specimens.—C. P. WHILE I was chatting with my host at milking time (at the head of Lake Chelan in the ante-tourist days), a dun-colored bird’ with light under- parts flew down into the corral, and began foraging as tho to the manor born. One by one the cows sniffed at the stranger and nosed. it about, following it up curiously. But the bird only side-stepped or walked unconcernedly ahead. When I returned with the gun, a moment later, I found a calf investigating the newcomer, and it was difficult to separate the creature from bossikin’s nose. The date was August 3rd; the bird proved to be a young male 44 THE cowsirp. © Cowbird in the lightest juvenile phase of plumage, a waif cuckold far from any of his kin, but shifting for himself with the nonchalance which characterizes his worthless kind. If our hero had lived (and I make no apology for his demise in the first act), he would have exchanged his inconspicuous livery for the rich, iridescent black of the adult; and he would have done this on the installment plan, by chunks and blotches, looking the while like a ragpicker, tricked out in cast-off finery. In the month of March Cowbirds mingle more or less with other blackbirds in the migrations, but if the main flock halts for refreshments and discussion en route, a group of these rowdies will hunt up some dis- reputable female of their own kind, and make tipsy and insulting advances to her along some horizontal limb or fence rail. Taking a position about a foot away from the coy drab, the male will make two or three accelerating hops toward her, then stop suddenly, allowing the impulse of motion to tilt him violently forward and throw his tail up perpendicularly, while at the same moment he spews out the disgusting notes which voice his passion. Of the mating, Chapman says: “They build no nest, and the females, lacking every moral instinct, leave their companions only long enough to deposit their eggs in the nests of other and smaller birds. I can imagine no sight more strongly suggestive of a thoroly despicable nature than a female Cowbird sneaking thru the trees and bushes in search of a victim upon whom to shift the duties of motherhood.” The egg, thus surreptitiously placed in another bird’s nest, usually hatches two or three days before those of the foster mother, and the infant Cowbird thus gains an advantage which he is not slow to improve. His loud clamoring for food often drives the old birds to abandon the task of incubation; or if the other eggs are allowed to remain until hatched, the uncouth stranger manages to usurp attention and food supplies, and not infrequently to override or stifle the other occupants of the nest, so that their dead bodies are by-and-by removed to make room for his hogship. It is asserted by some that in the absence of the foster parents the young thug forcibly ejects the rightful heirs from the nest, after the fashion of the Old World Cuckoos. I once found a nest which contained only a lusty Cowbird, while three proper fledgelings clung to the shrubbery below, and one lay dead upon the ground. When the misplaced tenderness of foster parents has done its utmost for the young upstart, he joins himself to some precious crew of his own blood, and the cycle of a changeling is complete. While not common anywhere west of the Rockies, the Cowbird is no longer rare east of the Cascades, and it is making its appearance at various points on Puget Sound. The earlier writers make no mention of its occur- THE BREWER BLACKBIRD. fe on rence in Washington, and it seems probable that its presence has followed tardily upon the introduction of cattle. Bendire was the first to report it from this State, having taken an egg near Palouse Falls on June 18, 1878, from a nest of the Slate-colored Sparrow (Passerella iliaca schistacea). “Its presence among us is, doubtless, often overlooked because of the superficial resemblance which it bears in note and appearance to Brewer’s Blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). The note of the former is dis- tinctive,—a shrill, hissing squeak in two tones with an interval of a descending third, uttered with great effort and apparent nausea—honestly, a disgusting sound. No. 16. BREWER’S BLACKBIRD. A. O. U. No. 510. Euphagus cyanocephalus (\Wagler). Description.—Adult male: Glossy black with steel blue and violet reflec- tions on head, with fainter greenish or bronzy reflections elsewhere; bill and feet black; iris pale lemon yellow or light cream. Adult female: Head and neck all around deep brownish gray with violet reflections; underparts brownish slate to blackish with faint greenish iridescence; upperparts blackish, or outright black on wings and tail, which are glossed with bluish-green; bill and feet as in male, but iris brown. /mmature males in first winter plumage resemble adults but have some edging of pale grayish brown. Length of adult males: 10.00 (254) ; wing 5.00 (128); tail 3.90 (99); bill .89 (22.6); tarsus 1.27 (32.3). Adult female: length 9.25 (235); wing 4.60 (117); tail 3.50 (89). bill .79 (20); tarsus 1.20 (30.5). Recognition Marks.—Robin size; pure black coloration and whitish eye of male. Larger than Cowbird (Molothrus ater) with which alone it is likely to be confused, Nesting.—Nest: placed at moderate height in bush clump or thicket, less frequently on ground at base of bush, more rarely in cranny of cliff or cavity of decayed tree-trunk, a sturdy, tidy structure of interlaced grasses, strengthened by a matrix of mud or dried cow-dung and carefully lined with coiled rootlets or horsehair. Nests in straggling colonies. Eggs: 4-7, usually 5 or 6, presenting two divergent types of coloration with endless variations and intermediate phases. Light type: ground color light gray or greenish gray, spotted and blotched with brown of varying shades, walnut, russet, and sepia. (In some examples there is purplish brown scrawling, which suggests the Redwing type. One egg in the writer’s collection is indistinguishable from that of a Cowbird, save for size.) Dark type: ground color completely obscured by overlay of fine brown dots resulting in nearly uniform shade of mummy brown or Vandyke brown. Av. size 1.03 x .72 (26.2 x 18.3). Season: April 20-May 10; one or two broods. General Range.—Western North America from the plains to the Pacific, and from the Saskatchewan region south to the highlands of Mexico to Oaxaca. 46 THE BREWER BLACKBIRD, Range in Washington.—Of general distribution thruout the State but found chiefly in more open situations in vicinity of streams and ponds and in cultivated sections. Normally migratory but increasingly resident especially on West-side. Authorities.—[ Lewis and Clark, Hist. Ex. (1814) Ed. Biddle: Coues, Vol. II. p. 185.] Scolecophagus mexicanus, Newberry, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. VI. IV. 1857, p. 86. (T) C&S. Lt. Rh. D". Ra, D*. Ss'. Ss*. Kk, J, B. E. pt. \ Speicmens.—U. of W. Prov. B. E. P. “BLACKBIRDS” are not usually highly esteemed in the East, where the memory of devastated cornfields keeps the wrath of the farmer warm; but if all species were as inoffensive as this confiding pensioner of the West, prejudice would soon vanish. He is a handsome fellow, our Wash- ington grackle, sleek, vivacious, inter esting, and serviceable withal. We know him best, perhaps, as an indus trious gleaner of pastures, corrals, streets, and “made” lands. Fle is not only the farmer's “hired man,” waging increasing warfare against insect life, | especially in its noxious larval forms, but he has an accepted place in the economy of city and village as well. As one approaches a feeding flock, he notes the eagerness with which the birds run forward, or rise and flit past their fellows, now diving at a nimble weevil, now leaping to catch a passing bug, but always pushing on until one : nae z ; erceives a curious rolling effect in the p a \ ( o € 5 4 total movement, a \s we draw near, some timid in dividual takes alarm, and instantly all are up, to alight again upon the fence |e or shrubbery where they clack and whistle, not so much by way of appre- : . ; . : BREWER'S BLACKBIRDS hension as thru sheer exuberance of nervous force. As we pass (we must not stop short, for they resent express attention) we note the droll white eyes of the males, as they twist and perk and chirp in friendly impudence; and the snuffy brown heads of the females vith their soft hazel irides, as they give a motherly fluff of the feathers, or yawn with impatience over the interrupted meal. When we are fairly by, the most venturesome dives from his perch, and the rest follow by twos and tens, till the ground is again covered by a shifting, chattering band ‘THE BREWER BLACKBIRD. 7 Like all Blackbirds, the Brewers are gregarious; but they are somewhat more independent than most, flocks of one or two score being more frequent than those of a hundred. During migrations and in autumnal flocking they associate more or less with Redwings; but, altho they are devoted to the vicinity of water, they care nothing for the fastnesses of reed and rush, which are the delight of Redwing and Yellowhead. Their preference is for more open situations, so that they are most abundant upon the East-side. Here a typical breeding haunt is a strip of willows fringing a swamp; or, better still, a line of dark green thorn-bushes clinging to the bank of the rolling Columbia. Altho isolated nests may now and then be found, colonies are the rule; and I have found as high as forty nests in a single patch of greenery. There is room, of course, for individual choice of nesting sites, but the com- munity choice is the more striking. Thus, one recalls the greasewood nesting, the rose-briar nesting, the thorn-bush nesting, where all the members of the colony conformed to the locally established rule in nest position. Mr. Bowles records the most remarkable instance of this: One season the nests of the South Tacoma colony were all placed in small bushes, the highest not over four feet from the ground; but in the season following the birds were all found nesting in cavities near the top of some giant fir stubs, none of them less than 150 feet from the ground. On the other hand, in the Usk nesting of 1906, on the placid banks of the Pend d’Oreille, one pair had recessed its nest in a stump at a height of eighteen feet, while three other pairs had sunk theirs into the ground at the base of bushes. In construction the nest of the Brewer Blackbird varies considerably, but at its best it is quite a handsome affair. Composed externally of twigs, weed-stalks, and grasses, its characteristic feature is an interior mould, or matrix, of dried cow-dung or mud, which gives form and stability to the whole. ‘The lining almost invariably includes fine brown rootlets, but horse- hair is also welcomed wherever available. The eggs of Brewer’s Blackbird are the admiration of odlogists. Rang- ing in color from clear greenish gray with scattered markings thru denser patterns to nearly uniform umber and chocolate, they are the natural favorites of “series” hunters. The range of variation is, indeed, curious, but it proves to be entirely individual and casual without trace of local or constant differ- ences. Eggs from the same nest are usually uniform in coloration, but even here there is notable diversity. In some instances, after three or four eggs are laid, the pigment gives out, and the remainder of the set is lighter colored. Again, single eggs are heavily pigmented half way, and finished with a clear green ground-color. 48 THE BREWER BLACKBIRD. I'resh eggs may be taken in the Yakima country during the last week in April, and in one case noted, deposition began on April 14th; but May tst-15th is the usual rule there and elsewhere. Five eggs is the common set, but six to a clutch is not rare. Of twenty-eight nests examined in Yakima County, May 4, 1906. eleven contained six eggs each; while, of something over two hundred seen altogether, two nests contained seven each. It is in his notes that the Brewer Blackbird betrays his affinities best of all. The melo- diously squeaking chatter of mating time is, of course, most like that of the Rusty Black bird (S. carolinus), but it lacks the bubbling character. He has then the swelling note of the Grackles proper, fff-ceet, the latter part rendered with some thing of a trill, the former merely as an aspirate; and the whole accompanied by expan sion of body, slight lifting of wings, and partial spreading of tail. ‘This note is uttered not only during the courting sea son, but on the occasion of ex citement of any kind. Aooreé has a fine metallic quality GROUND NEST OF BREWER BLACKBIRD which promptly links it to the Keyring note of the Redwing. Chup is the ordinary note of distrust and alarm, or of stern inquiry, as when the bird-man is caught fingering the for- bidden ovals \ harsh low rattle. or rolling note, is also used when the birds are squabbling among themselves, or fighting for position Unquestionably this species has gradually extended its range within the borders of the State. for the earlier investigators did not regard it as resident on Puget Sound. It has profited greatly and deservedly by the spread of settlement everywhere, and this is especially true of the more open situations Not a little it owes, also, to the introduction of cattle; for it is as great a rustler about corrals and stamping grounds as its renegade cousin, the Cowbird THE BULLOCK ORIOLE. 49 No. 17. BULLOCK’S ORIOLE. A. O. U. No. 508. Icterus bullockii (Swainson). Description.—4Adult male: Black, white, and orange; bill, lore, a line thru eye, and throat (narrowly) jet black; pileum, back, scapulars, lesser wing-coverts, primary coverts, and tertials chiefly black, or with a little yellowish skirting; remiges black edged with white; middle and greater coverts continuous with edging of tertials and secondaries, white, forming a large patch; tail chiefly yellow but central pair of rectrices black terminally, and remaining pairs tipped with blackish; remaining plumage, including supraloral areas continuous with super- ciliaries, orange yellow, most intense on sides of throat and chest, shading thru cadmium on breast to chrome on rump, tail-coverts, etc. In young adults the orange is less intense and, encroaches upon the black of forehead, hind-neck, etc., altho the tail is more extensively black. Adult female: Above drab-gray, clearest on rump and upper tail-coverts; wings fuscous with whitish edging; pattern of white in coverts of male retained but much reduced in area; tail nearly uniform dusky chrome ; underparts in general sordid white; chin and lores white; forehead, superciliary, (indistinct), cheeks, hind-neck and chest more or less tinged with chrome yellow. Young males resemble the female but soon gain in intensity of yellow on the foreparts, gradually acquiring adult black along median line of throat and in streaks on pileum. Length of adult male about 8.25 (209.5) ; wing 3.89 (99); tail 3.07 (78); bill .73 (18.5); tarsus .98 (25). Female a little smaller. Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; black, white, and orange of male dis- tinctive; slender blackish bill of female strongly contrasting with the heavy light- colored bill of female Western ‘Tanager with which alone it is likely to be confused by the novice. General coloration of female ashy or drab rather than olivaceous, yellow of tail contrasting with whitish or light drab of tail-coverts. Nesting.—\est: a pouch of cunningly interwoven grasses, vegetable fibers, string, ete., 5 to 9g inches deep and lashed by brim to branches of deciduous tree. Eggs: usually 5, smoky white as to ground color, sometimes tinged with pale blue, more rarely with faint claret, spotted, streaked and elaborately scrawled with purplish black or dark sepia, chiefly about larger end. Elongate ovate; av. size .94 Xx .63 (23.9x 16). Season: May 20-June 15; one brood. General Range.—Western United States, southern British Provinces and plateau of Mexico; breeding north to southern British Columbia, Alberta and southern Assiniboia east to eastern border of Great Plains in South Dakota, Nebraska, etc., south to northern Mexico; in winter south to central Mexico. Range in Washington.—Regular summer resident in eastern Washington thruout settled sections and along water courses; rare or casual west of Cascades. Migrations.—Spring: Yakima County, May 2, 1900; Moses Lake, May 15, 1906; Chelan, May 21, 1896. 50 THE BULLOCK ORIOBE. Authorities.—/cterus bullockti Bon. Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. pt. IT, 1858, p. 550. 1. C&S: Ds Dey Sat: Sst), Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. C. P'. good cheer, springtime’s ripest offering and 5 BIRD of sunshine and emblem of summer achieved, is this happy-hearted creature who flits about the orchards and timber cultures of eastern Washington, The willows of the brook, the cottonwoods and the quaking asps, were his necessary home until the hand of the pioneer made ready the locust, the maple and the Lom- bardy poplars, which are now his favorite abiding places. And so, for many BULLOCK’S ORIOLE years, the droning of bees, the heavy-scented breath of the acacia, and the high, clear whistling of the Oriole have been associated memories. A little less dandified than his eastern cousin, the lordly Bird of Balti- more, the Bullock Oriole fulfills much the same economy in habit, song, and nesting as that well-known bird. He is, if anything, a little less muscial, also, and not so conspicuous. The males arrive a week or two in advance of their mates, and appear quite ill at ease until joined by their shy companions. Marriage compacts have to un i THE, BULLOC K ORIOLE. be settled at the beginning of the season, but rivalry is chiefly between the under-colored young blades who must make their peace with the sweet girl graduates of the pre- vious year. Orioles are very closely at- tached to a suitable locality, once chosen. and a group of nests in a single tree pre- senting successive annual stages of preservation, is fairly eloquent of conjugal fidelity. The purse-shaped nest of the Bullock Oriole is a marvel of indus- try and skill, fully equal in these respects to that of the Baltimore Bird. A specimen before me, from a small willow on Crab Creek, in Lincoln County, taken just after its completion, is composed entirely of vegetable fibers, the frayed inner bark of dead willows being chiefly in evidence, while plant-downs of willow, poplar, and clematis are felted into the interstices of the lower portion. This pouch is lashed at the brim by a hundred tiny cables to the sustaining twigs, and hangs to a depth of six inches, with a mean diameter of nearly three, yet so delicate are the materials and go fine the workmanship, that the whole structure weighs less than half an ounce. A more bulky, loose-meshed affair, taken at Brook Lake No. 4, in Douglas County, has a maximum depth of nine inches outside, a mean depth of six and a half inches inside, and a greater diameter of five inches. Near farm houses or in town the birds soon learn the value of string, thread, frayed rope, and other waste materials, and nests are made entirely of these less romantic substances. Occasionally a bird becomes entangled in the coils of a refractory piece of string or horse-hair, and tragedies of Orioles hanged at their own doorstep are of record. The eggs of this species, four to six in number, aresusually of a pale smoky gray color, and upon this ground appear curious and intricate scrawl- ings of purplish black, as tho made by a fine pen, held unsteadily while the egg was twirled. The purpose of this bizarre ornamentation, if indeed it has any, may be thought to appear where scanty coils of black horse-hair in the lining of the nest show up in high relief against the normal white back- Taken near Spokane. -*hoto by F. S. Merrill. FEMALE BULLOCK ORIOLE. 32 THE RULLOCK ORK + ground of vegetable felt | eam feet het under thee clreumstances the Ceys are sometimes mista eatee at f yance frven ‘fe eerroundings, The value of the @ er aged @ew os lees clear than im Me ease of the Baltisncere Chetek w bow the pendant branch of the elm tree: for the nest of the ut ‘ » often attached to stocky branches ie eet, SITE OF THE BULLOCER OFF0LI e a the Aether, ch ‘ vy tthe ; No here anv such otwk iene im the case of tl hy escape enemies by placing the ege Ad reach, The Ta would search Sheol for a maggot, and any effiert te Beat Ren wonola ! krupt the longest purse . Vired of the confinement of the nest, the ambitiots Medgeelings Glambec: » the sides and perch upon the brim From this less secure seoettion they re not infredue hslodged before they are quite ready to face the world. e ago a friend of mine. Mr. Chas. W. Robinson, of Chelan, secured fledgeling Oriole which he rescued from the water of the lake where it had ‘ lently just fallen from an overhanging nest. Whe taken heme it proved eady pet, and w given the freedom of the place. Somé two weeks ; end rescued a nesthng from another brood under precisely " and put it in a cage with the older bird The new- * un ios) THE CALIFORNIA BICOLORED BLACKBIRD. comer had not yet learned to feed himself, but only opened his mouth and called with childish insistence. Judge of the owner’s delight, and mine as a witness, when the older bird, himself little more than a fledgeling, began to feed the orphan with all the tender solicitude of a parent. It was irresistibly cunning and heartsome too, for the bird to select with thoughtful, brotherly kindness, a morsel of food, and hop over toward the clamoring stranger and drop it into his mouth; after this to stand back as if to say, “There, baby! how did you like that?” This trait was not shown by a chance exhibition alone, but became a regular habit, which was still fol- lowed when the older bird had attained to fly-catching. It upset all one’s notions about instinct, and made one think of a golden rule for birds. , No. 18. CALIFORNIAN BICOLORED BLACKBIRD. A. O. U. No. 499. Agelaius gubernator californicus Nelson. Description.—Adult male: “Uniform deep black, with a faint bluish green gloss in certain lights; lesser wing-coverts rich poppy red or vermilion; middle coverts black, or (if not entirely black) at least broadly tipped with black, the basal portion tawny buff or ochraceous; bill, legs, and feet black; iris brown” (Ridgway). Adult female in breeding plumage: Dark sooty brown more or less streaked on crown and back; chin and throat whitish or pinkish buff streaked with brown; faint superciliary stripe composed of narrow whitish streaks on sooty ground. Adult female in winter: Feathers more or less edged with rusty. Immature male; Lesser wing-coverts partly black, the remaining red not clear, ochraceous-rufous or orange-tawny. Length of adult male: (skins) 8.62 (219) ; wing 5.78 (136.9) ; tail 3.67 (93.2); bill .84 (21.3); tarsus 1.28 (32.5). Adult female 6.93 (176); wing 4.27 (108.5); tail 2.82 (71.6); bill .72 (18.3); tarsus 1.10 (27.9). Recognition Marks.—Like Redwing Blackbird but epaulets pure red with- out exposed buff. Nesting.—Nest and Eggs like those of the Northwestern Red-wing. Said to be less prolific. General Range.—Central and northern coast districts of California north to Washington; straggles irregularly eastward and southward in California in winter. Range in Washington.—Recorded breeding at Cape Disappointment and may possibly extend north to Gray’s Harbor. Authorities.—Agelaius gubernator Bonaparte, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, p. 530 (Columbia River by J. K. Townsend). Allen, B. N. O. C. VI. p. 128. R. H. Lawrence, Auk IX. 1892, 45. Kobbé. 54 "THE COLUMBIAN Eee WE accept this bird as a resident of this State chiefly on the testimony of William H. Kobbe, who listed it* as a breeding bird of Cape Disappoint- ment. He found it closely associated with the Northwestern Red-wing (4. phaniceus caurinus) altho the latter frequently pursued it in the attempt to expel it from the small swamp which both were compelled to occupy. This probably represents the northernmost extension of this species, the Gray’s Harbor record of Mr. Lawrence” being at least open to question in the matter of identification. The habits of the Bicolored Blackbird do not differ in any known particular from those of the familiar Red-wing, of which it is a discontinuous offshoot. No. 19. COLUMBIAN RED-WING. A. O. U. No. 498. Agelaius pheeniceus neutralis Ridgway. Synonyms.—San Disco Rep-winc. INTERIOR Rep-winc. Reb-wINGED SLACKBIRD. RED-SHOULDERED BLACKBIRD. SWAMP BLACKBIRD. Description.—Adult male in summer; Glossy black; lesser wing-coverts bright red (poppy-red, vermilion or scarlet) ; middle coverts buffy or ochraceous- buff—the two forming thus a conspicuous epaulet, or shoulder patch. Bill, legs, and feet horn black; irides brown. Adult male in winter: Middle wing-coverts more deeply buffy; scapulars and feathers of black more or less edged with rusty. In immature males the black of the plumage is more or less extensively margined with rusty-buffy or whitish; the wing-coverts have an admixture of black and the “red’’ of the lesser coverts is of a sickly hue (orange-tawny, etc.). Adult female in swnmer: Brownish gray, everywhere mottled and streaked, or striped, with dusky, finely on chin, cheeks, and superciliaries, where also more or less rubescent, heavily below, less distinctly above; lesser coverts brownish-gray or dull red; middle coverts black edged with buffy. Bill dusky lightening below ; feet and legs dusky. Adult female in winter: Plumage of upperparts more or less margined with rusty or ochraceous; sides of head and underparts tinged with buffy. Length of adult males (skins) : 8.39 (213.1); wing 4.84 (122.9) ; tail 3.57 (90.7) ; bill .g0 (23.1) ; tarsus 1.19 (30.2). Adult females (skins): 7.11 (181.9) ; wing 3.98 (101.3) ; tail 2.85 (72.4) ; bill .77 (19.6) ; tarsus 1.06 (26.9). Recognition Marks.—Chewink to Robin size; bright red epaulets of male; general streakiness of female. Female lighter-colored and not so heavily streaked as in A. p. caurinus. Nesting.— Nest: a neatly woven but rather bulky basket of grasses, cat-tail leaves or hemp, usually lashed to upright stalks of cat-tail, occasionally on bushes, a. The Auk, Vol. XVII., Oct. 1900, p. 354. b. The Auk, Vol. IX., Jan. 1892, p. 45. THE COLUMBIAN RED-WING. 55 as willow and the like; lining of fine grasses of uniform size. Eggs: 4-7, usually 4, light blue to dull grayish blue, scrawled, blotched or clouded with dark purple, purplish brown or black, chiefly about the large end. Av. size 1.04 x .70 (26.4 x 17.8). Season: last week in April, June; two broods. General Range.—\estern United States in the interior north to eastern British Columbia, restricted by Rocky Mountains and Cascades in northern por- tion of range but reaching coast in San Diego and Los Angeles Counties in California and breeding as far east as western Texas, southward to northern Chihuahua and northern Lower California; displaced in Lower Colorado Valley and southern Arizona by A. p. sonoriensis ; south in winter to southern Texas, etc. Range in Washington.—F ound in all suitable localities east of the Cascades. Migrations.—Irregularly resident but numbers always greatly augmented about March Ist. Authorities—dgelaius pheniceus Vieil., Cooper and Suckley, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. XII. pt. II. 1860, 207. Allen, Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, VI. 1881, 128. 1D} IDES Sikh Sea IE Specimens.—U., of W. C. P. A MEADOWLARK may pipe from a sunny pasture slope in early February, and a Merrill Song Sparrow may rehearse his cheerful message in midwinter, but it takes the chorus of returning Blackbirds to bring boister- ous tidings of awakening spring. What a world of jubilation there is in their voluble whistlings and chirpings and gurglings, a wild medley of March which strikes terror to the faltering heart of winter. A sudden hush falls upon the company as the bird-man draws near the tree in which they are swarming; but a dusky maiden pouts, ‘“Who cares?” and they all fall to again, hammer and tongs, timbrel, pipes, and hautboy. Brewer's Blackbirds and Cowbirds occasionally make common cause with Red-wings in the northern migrations, but it is always the last-named who preponderate, and it is they who are most vivacious, most resplendent, and most nearly musical. The Red-wing’s mellow kongqueree or occasional tipsy zwhoop-er- qway-up is the life of the party. Almost before we know it our friends, to the number of a dozen pairs or more, have taken up their residence in a cat-tail swamp—nowhere else, if you please, unless driven to it—and here, about the third week in April, a dozen baskets of matchless weave are swung, or lodged midway of the growing plants. Your distant approach is commented upon from the tops of bordering willows by keyrings and other notes. At close range the lordly male, he of the brilliant epaulets and the proper military swagger, shakes out his fine clothes and says, Kongqueree, in a voice wherein anxiety is quite outweighed by vanity and proffered good-fellowship withal. But if you push roughly thru the outlying sedges, anxiety obtains the mastery. There is a hubbub in the marsh. Bustling, frowsy females appear and scold you roundly. The lazy gallants are all fathers now, and they join direful threats 56 THE COLUMBIAN RED-WING., to courteous expostulations, as they flutter wildly around the intruder’s 1ead. To the mischievous boy the chance of calling out these frantic atten- tions is very alluring, even when no harm 1s intended. | have said that the Red-wing prefers cat-tails for nesting; there is wobably no undisturbed area of cat-tails in eastern Washington which does not harbor Columbian Red-wings; yet, even so, the cover does not suffice and they are impelled to occupy the extensive tule beds which border the larger akes. For the second nesting, which occurs in June, the Blackbirds are likely NEST AND EGGS OF THE COLUMBIAN REDWING to try the willows, now covered with foliage; or, in default of these, may venture into any coarse vegetation which lines the swamp Four or five eggs are commonly laid and sets of six are very rare. On the 18th of May, 1896, 1 took a set « f eight eggs, all believed to be the product of one female, from a nest in Okanogan County, and this set 1s now in the Oberlin College Museum Of the economic value of the Red-wing there can be no question. The bird is chiefly insectivorous and destrovs an immense amount of insect lite, THE NORTHW ESTERN RED- WING. . 57 particularly in the larval state, injurious to vegetation. Its single fault is a weakness for young corn, but as corn is not a staple crop in Washington, this fault may be readily condoned in view of the bird’s valuable services to stockman and orchardist. No. 20. NORTHWESTERN RED-WING. A. O. U. No. 498f. Agelaius phoeniceus caurinus Ridgway. Synonyms.—RED-WINGED BLACKBIRD. RED-SHOULDERED BLACKBIRD. MARSH BLACKBIRD. SWAMP BLACKBIRD. Description.—Similar to 4. p. neutralis but female much darker, heavily streaked with black below; in winter feather skirtings of female more extensiv ely rusty. Measurements not essentially different. Recognition Marks.—As in preceding. Female darker and more heavily streaked than in A. p. neutralis. Nesting.—WNest: as in preceding ; dimensions 5 in. wide by 6 in. deep outside, 3X3 inside. Eggs: 3 or 4, rarely 5, colored as before; dimensions varying from THON RG 70620: 0-Xo19:3)) Lo) 1k OOExe. GON ((25)4ex 1617). Season: second to last week in April, June (Tacoma, April 6, 1906, 3 eggs) ; two broods. x General Range.—Northwest coast district from northern California north to sritish Columbia on Vancouver Island and mainland. Range in Washington.—Common in suitable localities west of the Cascades. Trregularly resident. Authorities.—Agelaius phaeniceus Vieil, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, 528. T. C&S. Rh. Kb. Ra. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. B. E. THE bird-man was sitting Turk-fashion on a great mossy log which ran far out into the rustling depths of the South Tacoma swamp. ‘The April sun flooded the scene with warm light and made one blink like a blissful drowsy frog, while the marsh sent up a grateful incense of curling vapor. A pocket lunch of bread and cheese was the ostensible occasion of this noontide bliss, but victuals had small charms beside those of the sputtering Tulé Wrens who played hide and seek améng the stems, or the dun Coots, who sowed their pulque pulque pulque notes along the reedy depths. Upon this scene of marshy content burst a vision of Phcenician splendor, Caurinus I., the military satrap of South Tacoma, the authentic tyee of Blackbirds. He was a well-aged bird, and as is the proper way with feathered folk, resplendent in proportion to his years. His epaulets seemed a half larger again than others, and their scarlet was of the brightest 58 THE NORTHWESTERN REDWING. hue, contrasting with a black mantle which fairly shone. He appeared an amiable old fellow, and as he lighted ponderously on an uplifted branch of my tree, he remarked, “Ilhoo-kuswee-ung,” so hospitably that I felt impelled to murmur, “Thanks,” and assured him of my unhostile intent. “Conqueree?” he questioned, richly. ‘*Er—well, yes, if you are the con- queror.”” But the general had other interests to watch. An upstart male of the second year with shoulder-straps of a sickly orange hue, was descried a rod away climbing hand-over-hand up a cat-tail stem. Aeyring, keyring, the despot warned him; and because the presumptuous youth did not heed him quickly, enough, he launched his splendor over the spot, whereat the youth sank in dire confusion, And next, our hero caught sight of a female fair to look upon peeping at him furtively from behind her lattice of reeds. To see was to act, he flung his heart at the maiden upon the instant, and followed headlong after, thru I know not what reedy mazes. Oh, heart ever young, and pursuit never wearying! Northwestern Red-wings find rather restricted range thruout western Washington, but they appear wherever there are fresh-water marshes or reed-bordered lakes. In default of cat-tails they will accept the shelter of dwarf willows, or coarse dense grass of any sort. Nesting is undertaken at Tacoma at least by the third week in April, and we have found eggs as early as the sixth of that month. The nest of the accompanying illustration (photogravure) is composed solely of the coiled stems of the dried bulrushes, amongst which it is placed, with a lining of clean dried grass-stems. Few eggs exceed in beauty those of the Red-winged Blackbird. The background is a pale bluish green of great delicacy, and upon this occur sharply-defined spots, blotches, marblings, traceries, and “pen-work” of dark sepia, purplish black, drab, and heliotrope purple. Or a spot of color appears to be deeply imbedded in the fine, strong texture of the shell, and carries about it an aura of diminishing color. Occasionally, the whole egg is suffused with pale brownish, or, more rarely, it is entirely unmarked. Incubation lasts fourteen days and the young are ready to leave the nest in a little over two weeks more. They are frizzly, helpless, complain- ing little creatures, but if they cannot fly well they can clamber, and they cling with the grip of terrified monkeys. Our Northwestern Red-wings are normally migratory, but they also winter with us irregularly; and this habit appears to be gaining ground as the guarantee of food becomes more certain. Numbers of them subsist in both Seattle and Tacoma in the vicinity of grain elevators, where they will have comfortable sustenance until such time as the augmented English Spar- rows decree death to all native birds. * THE YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD. 59 No. 21. YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD. A. O. U. No. 497. Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus (Bonap.). Description.— Adult male: Head, neck all around, and breast orange yel- low; lores and feathers skirting eyes and bill, black; a double white patch on folded wing formed by greater and lesser coverts, but interrupted by black of bastard wing; usally a little yellow about vent and on tibiee; the remaining plumage black, dull or subdued, and turning brown on wing-tips and tail. Female: Dark brown; line over eye, throat, and upper breast dull yellow. - Length 10.00- 11.00 (254-279.4); wing 5.30-5.60 (134.6-142.2); tail 4.00-4.50 (101.6-114.3) ; bill .g0 (22) ; tarsus 1.25 (31.8). Female smaller, length 8.00-9.50 (203.2-241.3). Recognition Marks.—Robin size; yellow head and breast; white wing- patches. Nesting.—Nest: a bulky but usually neat fabric of dried grasses, reeds or cat-tails lashed to growing ones; 5-7 inches in diameter outside by 5-8 deep; inside deeply cupped. Eggs: 3-6, gtayish green spotted or clouded with reddish brown, rarely scrawled as in Agelaius; elongate ovate in shape. Av. size, 1.10 x .75 27.9x 19). Season: May or June; one brood. General Range.—Western North America from Wisconsin, Illinois and Texas to the Pacific Coast, and from British Columbia and the Saskatchewan River southward to the Valley of Mexico. Accidental in Middle and Atiantic States. Range in Washington.—Of local distribution in eastern Washington chiefly east of the Columbia River. Rare or casual west of the Cascades. Summer resident. Authorities.—[“ Yellow-headed Blackbird,” Johnson, Rep. Goy. W. T. 1 (1885), 22.] Bendire, Life Hist. N. A. Birds, Vol. II. 1895, p. 447. Sst. J. Specimens.— Prov. C. P. 884 OH, well for the untried nerves that the Yellow-headed Blackbird sings by day, when the sun is shining brightly, and there are no supporting signs of a convulsion of Nature! Verily, if love affected us all in similar fashion, the world would be a merry mad-house. The Yellow-head is an extraordinary person—you are prepared for that once you catch sight of his resplendent gold-upon-black livery—but his avowal of the tender passion is a revelation of incongruity. Grasping a reed firmly in both fists, he leans forward, and, after premonitory gulps and gasps, succeeds in pressing out a wail of despairing agony which would do credit to a dying catamount. When you have recovered from the first shock, you strain the eyes in astonishment that a mere bird, and a bird in love at that, should give rise to such a cata- clysmic sound. But he can do it again, and his neighbor across the way can do as well—or worse. When your nerves have somewhat recovered, modesty . 60 THE YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD. overcomes you, and you retire, not without a chastened sense of privilege that you have lived to hear the Yellow-head pop the question,—‘and also you lived after.” The expiring Romeo cry is quite the finest of the Xanthocephaline reper- tory, but there are others not devoid of interest. Ok-eh-ah-oh-oo is a musical series of startling brilliancy, comparable in a degree to the yodelling of a street urchin,—a_ succession of sounds of varying pitches, produced as tho by altering the oral capacity. It may be noted thus: ———y The last note is especially mellow Pf = and pleasing, recalling to some ears the liquid gurgle of the Bobolink, to which, of course, our bird is distinctly related. Alternating with the last named, and more frequently heard from the depths of the nesting swamp is gu’, gurrl; or, as oftenest, yewi(nk), yewi(nk), gur-gurrl. In this phrase the gurrl is drawn out with comical effect, as tho the gallant were down on his knees before some unyielding maiden. The Yellow-head’s ordinary note of dis- trust, equivalent to the dink note of the Red- wing, is kluck or koluck’. In flight this Photo by the Author becomes almost invariably oo'kluk, oo kluk. MALE YELLOW HEAD ; ee ae At rest, again, this is sometimes prolonged into a thrilling passage of resonant “I” notes, probably remonstratory in character. The alarm cry is built upon the same basis, and is uttered with exceeding vehemence, klookoloy, klookoloy, klook ocooo. Finally, if one may presume to speak finally of so versatile a genius, they have a harsh, rasping note very similar in quality to the scolding note of the Steller Jay, only lighter in weight and a little higher in pitch. This is the note of fierce altercation, or the distress cry in imminent danger. The last time I heard it was in the rank herbage bordering upon a shallow lake in Douglas County. I rushed in to find a big blow-snake coiling just below a nestful of young birds, while the agonized parents and sympathetic neighbors hovered over the spot crying piteously. To stamp upon the reptile was but the work of a moment; and when I dropped the limp ophidian upon the bare ground, all the blackbird population gathered about the carcass, shuddering but exultant, and—perhaps it was only fancy—grateful too. For all the Yellow-head is so decided in utterance, in disposition he is somewhat phlegmatic, the male bird especially lacking the vivacity which characterizes the agile Brewer Blackbird. Except when hungry, or im- THE YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD. 61 pelled by passion, he is quite content to mope for hours at a time in the depths of the reeds; and even in nesting time, when his precincts are invaded, he oftener falls to admiring his own plumage in the flooding sun shine than tries to drive off the intruder. Let the homely and distrait female attend to that. NEST OF YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD IN TULES 62 THE YELLOW-HEADED BLACKBIRD. This bird is es sentially a plains- loving species, and its favorite haunts with us are the reedy borders of the treeless lakes, and the upland sloughs of eastern Washington. It is highly gregarious, especially in the fall and early spring, but con fesses to about the same degree of domesticity as the Red-wing, in late spring and early summer The nests are stoutly-woven bas kets of reeds and grasses, light and dry and hand some. No mud or other matrix ma- terial is used in construction, and the interior is al- ways carefully \ STOUTLY-WOVEN BASKE1 lined with fine grass The dry illimitable bulrushes are the favorite cover, but rank herbage of any sort is used if only it be near or over water. The most humble situations suffice; and the nest is often placed within a foot of the water, or its equiv- alent of black ooze. Nos 22: WESTERN MEADOWLARK. A. O. U. No. 501.1. Sturnella neglecta Audubon. Synonyms.—Firtp Lark. Op-rigip Lark. MepiarK. Meprar (poeti- cal). Mupbiark (corruption). Description.—4dult male: General color of upperparts brownish black modified by much tawny and buffy-gray edgings of the feathers which throw the black into stripes and bars with suggestion of herring-bone pattern; the tawny heaviest on secondaries and upper tail-feathers where taking the form of partial bands, a median crown stripe and posterior portion of superciliary sordid white or buffy; anterior portion of superciliary, cheeks, chin, upper throat, breast (broadly) and middle belly rich lemon yellow (inclining to orange in older specimens); a large black crescent on upper breast; sides and flanks black- streaked and spotted with pale brown on a bufty or whitish ground. Bill variegated, tawny, black and white. Female: Like male but smaller and paler with some substitutions of brown for black in streaking; black of jugulum veiled by grayish tips of feathers; yellow of breast duller. etc. The plumage of both sexes is duller in fall and winter, the normal colors being restrained by buffy overlay. Length of adult male: 10.00-11.00 (254-279.4); wing 4.85 (123.2); tail 3.00 (76.2) ; bill 1.30 (33) ; tarsus 1.46 (37.1). Female smaller. Recognition Marks.—Robin size; yellow breast with black collar distinctive ; general streaky appearance above; yellow cheeks as distinguished from the Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna). Nesting.—Nest: on the ground in thick grass or weeds; a slight depression lined (carefully or not) and usually overarched with dried grasses. Eggs: 4-6, white, speckled and spotted, sometimes very sparingly, with cinnamon brown or purplish ; very variable in shape, elliptical ovate to almost round. Av. size, 1.12 x 80 (28.5 x 20.3). Season: April and June; two broods. ‘Tacoma, April 5, 1906, 4 fresh eggs. General Range.—Western United States, southwestern British Provinces, and northwestern Mexico, east to prairie districts of Mississippi Valley, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, ete., occasionally to Illinois and Michigan; breeding thruout its range. Range in Washington.—Abundant east and west of the Cascades; largely resident on the West-side, partially on the East-side; numbers augmented from the south during last week in February. Authorities.—[Lewis and Clark, Hist. Ex. (1814), Ed. Biddle: Coues. Vol II. p. 186.] Sturnella neglecta Aud., Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, Seloy AM (Geasy 1 Wave IDV Shey Ines IDLE SSS SG Gels} 1s Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. B. E. BN. P'. SUMMER silences the birds so gradually and we ourselves have become so much absorbed in business during the prosy days of September that we 64 THE WESTERN MEADOWBARK. | have almost forgotten the choruses of springtime and have come to accept our uncheered lot as part of the established order of things. But on a nippy October morning, as we are bending over some dull task, there comes a sound which brings us to our feet. We hasten to the window, throw up the sash and lean out into the cool, fresh air while a Meadowlark rehearses, all at a sitting, the melodies of the year’s youth. It all comes back to us with a rush; the smell of lush grasses, the splendor of apple blossoms, the courage of lengthening days, the ecstacies of courtship—all these are recalled by the lark-song. It is as tho this forethoughted soul had caught the music of a May day, just at its prime, in a crystal vase, and was now pouring out the imprisoned sound in a gurgling, golden flood. What cheer! What heartening! Yea; what rejuvenation it brings! Wine of youth! Splashes of color and gay delight! It is impossible not to rhapsodize over the Meadowlark. He is a rhap- sodist himself. Born of the soil and lost in its embraces for such time as it pleases him, he yet quits his lowly station ever and again, mounts some fence- post or tree-top, and publishes to the world an unquenchable gladness in things-as-they-are. If at sunrise, then the gleams of the early ray flash resplendent from his golden breastplate,—this high-priest of morning; and all Nature echoes his joyous blast: ‘Thank God for sunshine!” Or if the rain begins to fall, who so quickly grateful for its refreshment as this optimist of the ground, this prophet of good cheer! There is even an added note of exultation in his voice as he shouts: ‘Thank God for rain!” And who like him can sing farewell to parting day! Piercing sweet from the meadows come the last offerings of day’s daysmen, peal and counterpeal from rival friendly throats, unfailing, unfaltering, unsubdued: “It is good to live. It is good to rest. Thank God for the day now done!” The Meadowlark of the East has a poet’s soul but he lacks an adequate instrument of expression. His voice does not respond to his requirement. Perhaps his early education, as a species, was neglected. Certain it is that in passing westward across the prairies of Iowa or Minnesota one notices an instant change in the voices of the Meadowlarks. The song of the western bird is sweeter, clearer, louder, longer and more varied. The differ- ence is so striking that we can explain it only upon the supposition of an independent development. The western bird got his early training where prairie wild flowers of a thousand hues ministered to his senses, where breath of pine mingled faintly with the aroma of neighboring cactus bloom, and where the sight of distant mountains fired the imagination of a poet race. At any rate we of the West are proud of the Western Meadowlark and would have you believe that such a blithe spirit could evolve only under such circumstances. THE WESTERN MEADOWLARK. 65 Bird song never exactly conforms to our musical notation, and there is no instrument save the human “whistle” which will even passably reproduce the quality of the Meadowlark’s song. Nevertheless, many interesting ex- periments have been made in recording these songs and a little attention will convince the least accomplished musician that there is a fascinating field for study here. A formal song of the Western Meadowlark comprises from four to a dozen notes, usually six or seven. The song phrases vary endlessly in detail, yet certain types are clearly distinguishable, types which reappear in different parts of the country, apparently without regard to local traditions or suppo- sitional schools of song. ‘Thus a Chelan singer says, “Okuw wheeler, ku wheeler, and he may not have a rival in a hundred miles; yet another bird on the University campus in Seattle sings, Eh heu, wheel'iky, wheel'iky, or even Eh heu wheel'iky, wheel'iky, wheel'iky, and you recognize it instantly as belonging to the same type. In like manner Owyhee, rec itative was heard with perfect distinctness both at Wallula and in Okanogan County. Each bird has a characteristic song-phrase by which he may be recognized and traced thru a season, or thru succeeding years. One boisterous spirit in Chelan I shall never forget for he insisted on shouting, hour after hour, and day after day, “Hip! Hip! Hurrah! boys; three cheers!” Yet, while this is true, no bird is confined to one style of song. An autumnal soloist in Ravenna Park rendered no less than six distinct songs or song-phrases in a rehearsal lasting five minutes. He gave them without regard to sequence, now repeating the same phrase several times in succession, now hurrying on to new forms, pausing only after each utterance for breath. Nor is the effort of the Western Meadowlark confined to the formal song for he often pours out a flood of warbling, chattering and gurgling notes which at close range are very attractive. Not infrequently he will interrupt one of these meditative rhapsodies with the clarion call, and return immedi- ately to his minor theme. In the presence of a stranger the lark serves frequent notice of intended departure in a vigorous toop, or toob, accompanying the sound with an emphatic flirt of the wings and jerk of the tail. Now and then the actual departure is accompanied by a beautiful yodelling song. After several pre- liminary toobs the bird launches himself with fantastic exaggeration of effort and rolls out, Oly oly o'ly oly oly, with ravishing sweetness. At nesting time the parent birds have many causes for apprehension, and as they move about in search of food they give vent to the toob note of distrust in a fashion which soon becomes chronic. In Douglas County this note is doubled, two’ bit, or two’ whit, and one cannot recall the varied life of the sage in June without hearing as an undertone the half melancholy two’ bit of a mother Meadowlark as she works her way homeward by fearful stages. 66 THE WESTERN MEADOWLARK e dist ull 1 i l¢ nm ¢ t ited : Pond )) i ‘ | ‘ S¢ fa l rcedi 1, { te S! es magpies, crows Hawks and owls otherwise blameless in the bird-world ert THE WESTERN MEADOWLARK. 67 of the Shore-birds. Or, again, she may cling to her charge in desperation hoping against hope till the last possible moment and taking chances of final mishap. In this way a friend of mine once discovered a brooding Meadow- lark imprisoned underneath his boot—fortunately without damage for she occupied the deep depression of a cow-track. To further concealment the grass-lined depression in which the Meadow- lark places her four or five speckled eggs is almost invariably over-arched with dried grasses. ‘This renders the eggs practically invisible from above, and especially if the nest is placed in thick grass or rank herbage, as is customary. ‘Touching instances of blind devotion to this arch tradition were, however, afforded by a sheep-swept pasture near Adrian. Here the salt-grass was cropped close and the very sage was gnawed to stubs. But the Meadow- larks, true to custom, had imported long, dried grasses with which to over- arch their nests. Asa result one had only to look for knobs on the landscape. By eye alone we located six of these pathetic landmarks in the course of a half-hour’s stroll. One brood is usually brought off by May Ist and another by the middle of June. Altho Meadowlarks are classed as altricial, i. e. having young help- less when hatched and which require to be nurtured in the nest, the young Meadowlarks are actually very precocious and scatter from the nest four or five days after hatching, even before they are able to fairly stand erect. This arrangement lessens the chances of wholesale destruction but it would appear to complicate the problem from the parental standpoint. How would you, for instance, like to tend five babies, each in a separate thicket in a trackless forest, and that haunted by cougars, and lynxes, and boa-constrictors and things ? We cannot afford to be indifferent spectators to this early struggle for existence, for it is difficult to overestimate the economic value of the Meadow- lark. The bird is by choice almost exclusively insectivorous. If, however, when hard pressed, he does take toll of the fallen wheat or alfalfa seed, he is as easily justifiable as is the hired man who consumes the farmer’s biscuits that he may have the strength to wield the hoe against the farmer’s weeds. Being provided with a long and sensitive bill, the Meadowlark not only gleans its insect prey from the surface of the ground, but works among the grass roots, and actually probes the earth in its search for wire- and cut- worms, those most dreaded pests. Besides devouring injurious grubs and insects of many kinds, the Lark has a great fondness for grasshoppers, sub- sisting almost entirely upon these in the season of their greatest abundance. In the matter of grasshopper consumption alone Meadowlarks of average distribution, are estimated by no less an authority than Professor Beal, to be worth about twenty-four dollars per month, per township, in saving the hay crop. ‘To the individual farmer this may seem a small matter, but in 68 THE WESTERN EVENING GROSBEAK. the aggregate the saving to the nation amounts to some hundreds of thous- ands of dollars each year. Even in winter, when a few individuals or occa- sional companies of Larks are still to be found, a large proportion of their food consists of hardy beetles and other insects, while weed-seed and scatter- ing grain is laid under tribute, as it were, reluctantly. It goes without saying that we cannot regard this bird as lawful game. We exempt the horse from slaughter not because its flesh is unfit for food— it is really very sapid—but because the animal has endeared itself to our race by generations of faithful service. We place the horse in another category, that of animal friend. And the human race, the best of it, has some time since discovered compunctions about eating its friends. Make friends with this bonny bird, the Meadowlark, and you will be ashamed thenceforth to even discuss assassination. Fricassee of prima donna! Voice of morning en brochette! Bird-of-merry-cheer on toast! Faugh! And yet that sort of thing passed muster a generation ago—does yet in the darker parts of Europe! No. 23. WESTERN EVENING GROSBEAK. A. O. U. No. 514a. Hesperiphona vespertina montana Ridgway. Description.—Adult male: Forehead and superciliaries gamboge yellow; feathers about base of bill, lores, and crown black; wings black with large white patch formed by tips of inner secondaries and tertials; tail black; remaining plumage sooty olive brown about head and neck, shading thru olive and olive- green to yellow on wing and under tail-coverts. Bill bluish horn-color and citron yellow; feet brownish. Adult female: General color deep smoky brownish gray or buffy brown, darker on the head, lighter on wings, lighter, more buffy, on sides, shading to dull whitish on throat and abdomen, tinged with yellowish green on hind-neck, clearing to light yellow on axillars and under wing-coverts; a small clear white patch at base of inner primaries; white blotches on tips of upper tail-coverts and inner webs of tail-feathers in varying proportions. Length about 8.00 (203.2); wing 4.39 (111.5); tail 2.42 (61.4); bill .82 (20.8); depth at base 62 (15.9); tarsus. 81 (20.3). Female very slightly smaller. Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; olive-brown coloration with black and white in masses on wings; large, conical beak distinctive; high-pitched call note. Nesting.—Has not yet been found breeding in Washington but undoubtedly does so. Nest (as reported from New Mexico): principally composed of fine rootlets with some Usnea moss and a few sticks, settled upon horizontal branches of pine or fir, near tip, and at considerable heights; in loose colonies. Eggs: 4, “in color, size, form, and texture indistinguishable from those of the Red-winged Blackbird” (Birtwell). 68 THE WESTERN EVENING Gil Rk. #5 - the aggregate the saving to the nation amounts to some hundreds of thous- ands of dollars each year. Even in winter, when a few ievlividuals or occa- _ sional companies of Larks are still to be found, a large peypettion of their food consists of hardy beetles and other insects, while weed-seet and scatter- ing grain is laid under tribute, as it were, reluctantly, It gues without saying that we cannot regard this bird as lawfel game. . We exempt the horse from slaughter not because its flesh is unfit for fowd— it is really very sapid—but because the animal has endeared itself to our race by generations of faithful service. We place the horse in another category, that of animal friend. And the human race, the best of it, has some time since discovered compunctions about eating its friends. Make friends with this bonny bird, the Meadowlark, and you will be ashamed thenceforth to — even discuss assassination. Fricassee of prima donna! Voice of en brochette! Bird-of-merry-cheer on toast! Faugh! And yet that sort of thing passed muster a generation ago—dees yet in the darker parts of Europe! , aan ‘ . a ee es et ee ° , : > rat 1 WESTERN EVENING*GROSBEAKS vat - MAE AND) PENPALS |ACLIETIBIZER AK A, O. O' No.s14a. Ficca Roca venperilea meatier Digaay ; ; Description,—Adu/t male: Forehead and superciliaries ge yellow; feathers about base of bill, lores,.and crown black; black with white patch formed by tips of inner secondaries and ; tail ; remaining plumage sooty olive brown about head and neck, olive- green to yellow on wing and under tail-coverts. Bill horn-color and citron yellow ; feet brownish. Adult female; General color deep smoky brownish Zz or buffy brown, darker on the head, lighter on wings, er, more ,on ; shading to dull whitish on throat and abdomen, tinged with ish green on — hind-neck, clearing to light yellow on axillars and under wi ; a small — wing-Coverts ; a. clear white patch at base of inner primaries; white blotches on tips of tail-coverts and inner webs of tail-feathers in eee sheet 8.00 (203.2); wing 4.30 (111.5); tail 2.42 (61.4); bill B2 (20.8); at base .62 (15.9); tarsus, 81 (20.3). Female very slightly smaller. Recognition Marks,—Chewink size; olive-brown coloration with black and white in masses on wings; large, conical beak distinetive; high-pitched call note. Nesting.—Has not yet been found breeding in Washin, but undoubtedly does so. Nest (as reported from New Mexico): Chcigllls aan of fine rootlets with some Usnea moss and a few sticks, settled upon horizontal branches of pine or fir, near tip, and at considerable heights; in loose colonies. rik i om those of the Red- J “in color, size, form, and texture incistinguishable fr Blackbird” ( Birtwell). J THE WESTERN EVENING GROSBEAK. 69 General Range.—Western United States and Northern Mexico; east to and including Rocky Mountains; north to British Columbia. Range in Washington.—Co-extensive with evergreen timber and appearing irregularly elsewhere. Resident within State but roving locally. Winters regu- larly in parks of the larger cities. Authorities? Fringilla vespertina ‘Townsend, Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. VIII. 1839, 154 (Columbia R.). Hesperiphona vespertina Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, 409. T. C&S. Ra. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. P'. Prov. B. E. SPARROWS are also called Cone-bills ; it is, therefore, fair that the bird with the biggest cone should take precedence in a family history. But for this primacy there are damaging limitations. The Grosbeak is neither the most beautiful nor the most tuneful of the Fringillidze, if he is by common consent rated the oddest. His garb is a patchwork; his song a series of shrieks; his motions eccentric; his humor phlegmatic; and his concepts beyond the ken of man. Altho at times one of the most approachable of birds, he is, on the whole, an avian freak, a rebus in feathers. Perhaps we make too much of a mystery of him, just as we rate the owl highest in wisdom for the single discretion of silence, which any dunderhead may attain. But now take this group in the park; just what are they at? They sit there stolidly in the rowan tree where all the passersby may take note of them, giving vent ever and anon to explosive yelps, but doing nothing by the hour, until an insane impulse seizes one of their number to be off to some other scene no better, be it near or far, and the rest yield shrieking consent by default of alternative idea. It is all so unreasonable, so uncanny, that it irritates us. Evening Grosbeaks are semi-gregarious the year around, but are seen to best advantage in winter or early spring, when they flock closely and visit city parks or wooded lawns. One is oftenest attracted to their temporary quarters by the startling and disconnected noises which are flung out broad- cast. It may be that the flock is absorbed in the depths of a small fir, so that one may come up near enough to analyze the sound. Three sorts of notes are plainly distinguishable: a low murmuring of pure tones, quite pleasant to the ear; a harsh but subdued rattle, or alarm note, wzesst or twsszp, familiarly similar to that of the Crossbill; and the high-pitched shriek, which dis- tinguishes the bird from all others, dimp. A little attention brings to light the fact that all the birds in the flock bring out this astonishing note at precisely the same pitch. Once distinguished, this note will serve again and again to draw attention to this uncanny fowl, as it passes overhead or loses itself in the bosom of some giant conifer. 70 THE AL ASKAN PINE GROSB AK. It is not a little surprising at first thought, that the habits of these birds are best known in our larger cities, Seattle, Tacoma, Spokane, and Portland. Why they should be especially attracted to them, it is hard to say, unless it be that they love the din of urban life, which they help so valiantly to promote. But it is easy to see why they are more noticeable there; for their showy and patchy coloration marks them as distinguished visitors in town, whereas in the forest their colors so melt into and harmonize with their surroundings that it is difficult to follow their movements. These Grosbeaks, or New World Hawfinches, are not to be commended as horticulturists. In winter they feed largely upon the ground, gleaning fallen seeds and fruits; and are especially fond of the winged key of the large- leafed maple (Acer macrophyllum). They drop down to such a feast one by one from the branches above, and it is amusing to note how the loud cracking of seeds is interspersed with music. A little later the birds devote themselves to swelling buds, and here too the maple is a favorite; tho ash, alder, flowering currant, and a dozen more are not disdained. The damage done is not considerable; for the birds, viewed in the large, are not numerous enough, all told, to be taken seriously ; but viewed in the concrete, the snip, snip, of those mandibles in the lilac bushes is no idle joy. It may be that the key of high C sharp, or whatever it be, staccato con moto, is the accepted love note, and that the green-liveried swain hurls declarations at his enamorata, like Samson in Handel's oratorio, the live-long year. Anyway, his exertions are redoubled in early June, and he charges about in a reckless frenzy which should make the city gape. June, 1906, was memorable to us for the abundance of these Grosbeaks in the vicinity of Spokane. The very air of Cannon Hill and Hangman’s Creek seemed charged with expectation of Grosbeaks’ nests. But they were not for us. Nor has the nest yet been taken in Washington. No. 24. ALASKAN PINE GROSBEAK. A, O. U. No. 515c. Pinicola enucleator alascensis Ridgway. Synonym.—Pineé BuLLFINcH. Description.—Adu/t male: In highest plumage rosy red (poppy red) ; back with dusky centers of feathers; lower belly and under tail-coverts ashy gray—this high plumage is the exception; in general the rosy gives place to ashy gray in varying proportions; wings and tail ashy dusky; tips of middle and greater coverts and outer edges of exposed tertials white (or rosy). Bill dusky; feet blackish. Adult female: Similar to male but rosy replaced by dingy yellow (vary- THE ALASKAN PINE GROSBEAK. a1 ing from olive-yellow, olive-tawny and ochraceous to bricky red) and chiefly confined to head, hind-neck and upper tail-coverts (where brightest) ; feathers of back frequently tipped with ochraceous and breast with an ochrey wash. Length about 8.60 (218.4); wing 4.60 (117); tail 3.66 (93); bill .57 (14.5); tarsus 89 (22.7). Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; large, rounded conical beak; red and gray coloration for size distinctive. Nesting.—‘“Nest, composed of a basement of twigs and rootlets within which is a more compact fabric of finer materials. Eggs, usually 4, pale greenish blue, spotted and blotched with dark brown surface markings and lilac shell-spots.” Av. size 1.05 x .74 (26.7x 18.8). Season: About June rst; one brood. General Range.—‘Northwestern North America, except Pacific Coast, breeding in interior of Alaska; south, in winter, to eastern British Columbia, Montana (Bitterroot Valley), etc.” (Ridgway). Range in Washington.—Reported by Allan Brooks as breeding in the Mt. Baker district (as below) ; should occur upon the timbered lowlands in winter. Authorities.—Allan Brooks in epist. Dawson, Auk Vol. XXV. Oct. 1908, p. 482. Specimens.— Prov. THIS large and handsome Finch is of very irregular occurrence in southern British Columbia excepting the higher mountain ranges, where it breeds. During some winters it is present in‘large numbers, while in others, equally severe, none are seen. The species was very common throughout the winter of 1906-1907, a very severe one; but in that of 1901-1902, which was notably mild, Pine Grosbeaks were noticed in considerable numbers as far south as Penticton, 40 miles north of the international boundary, and they undoubtedly occurred much farther south. Their food in the winter months is principally berries, but, strange to say, they altogether refuse those of the mountain ash, both the introduced and indigenous species. The former is the favorite food of the Eastern Pine Grosbeak thruout the winter in Ontario, but trees loaded with fruit were passed by at Okanagan Landing in the winter of 1906-1907, even after the birds had eaten all the rose hips and snow berries and were reduced to eating weed seeds with the Leucostictes. Either this sub-species or montana breeds on all the higher mountain ranges in British Columbia, occupying a zone from timber line downwards about 2,000 feet. My first acquaintance with the Pine Grosbeak at its breeding grounds, was in the Cascade Mountains due north of Mt. Baker, on both: sides of the Forty-ninth Parallel. Here the species was a somewhat sparing breeder close to timber line among the hemlock and balsam timber. They were feeding young on the 17th of July; at the same time Crossbills had fully 72 THE AMERICAN CROSSBIBL. grown young in flocks. No red males were seen, though many gray males were singing in the early mornings from the topmost spray of some balsam. In the writer's opinion the red plumage in the male is acquired at the first moult or immediately after the juvenal dress, and is usually only retained for one season; in some males a duller red dress is carried through the second summer, or more rarely a salmon-pink one; but in most cases the dress of the second summer is a gray one like the females, with yellow head and rump. Females may sometimes be seen with decidedly red heads and rumps,—from the size and shape of the bill these seem to be very old birds. The above remarks as to the red dress in the male apply also, in the writer's experience, to the genera Loxia, Carpodacus and Acanthis. ALLAN Brooks. No. 25. AMERICAN CROSSBILL. A. O. U. No. 521. Loxia curvirostra minor (Brehm.). Synonym.—Rep CRrossBILL. Description.—Adult male: Tips of mandibles crossed either way ; plumage red, brightest on rump; feathers of back with brownish centers; wings and tail fuscous. Shade of red very variable——orange, cinnabar, even vermilion, some- times toned down by a saffron suffusion. Jmmature males sometimes present a curiously mottled appearance with chrome-green and red intermingled. Female and young: Dull olive-green, brighter and more yellow on head and rump; below gray overcast by dingy yellow. Adult male, length 5.50-6.25 (139.7- 158.8) ; wings 3.40 (86.4) ; tail 2.05 (52.1); bill .70 (17.8) or under. Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size ; crossed mandibles ; male red and female olive-green; both without white wing-bars. “Nest: in forks or among twigs of tree, founded on a mass of twigs and bark-strips, the inside felted of finer materials, including small twigs, rootlets, grasses, hair, feathers, etc. Eggs: 3-4, 0.75 0.57, pale greenish, spotted and dotted about larger end with dark purplish brown, with lavender shell-markings” (Coues). Av. size, .85 x .53 (21.6 x 13.5) (Brewer). Season: erratic, Feb.-Oct. ; one brood. General Range.—Northern North America, resident sparingly south in the eastern United States to Maryland and Tennessee, and in the Alleghanies, irregu- larly abundant in winter. Of irregular distribution thruout the coniferous forests of the West, save in southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico, where replaced by L. c. stricklandi. : Range in Washington.—Found thruout the coniferous forests of the State; of irregular occurrence locally. Non-migratory but nomadie. Authorities.—Curvirostra americana Wils. Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. pt. IT. 1858, 426 part, 427. T. C&S. L'. D'. Ra. D+. J. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. E. B. THE AMERICAN CROSSBILL. 73 WHEN a bird’s pastures are the tree-tops it is possible for it to live a quite secluded life here in Washington. And, indeed, we know the Cross- bill chiefly as a wandering voice or, rather, a vocal babel, passing from summit to summit in the grim fir forest. But on a rare day, it may be in Spokane, or it may be in Tacoma, the birds descend to human levels and are discovered feeding busily on their favorite pine cones. The birds are perfectly in- different to equilibrium, and feed any side up without care. While thus engaged they may exhibit little fear of the beholder and sometimes venture within reach; but as often, for some whimsical reason they are up and away again as tho seized by evil spirits. The Crossbill owes its peculiar mandibles to an age-long hankering for pine-seeds (using that word in the generic sense), a desire fully satisfied according to the fashion of that Providence which works so variously thru Nature, and whose method we are pleased to call evolution. The bill of the bird was not meant for an organ of prehension, and Buffon, the Deist, once won a cheap applause by railing at the Almighty for a supposed oversight in this direction; but as matter of fact, its wonderful crossed mandibles enable the Crossbill to do what no other bird can; viz., pry and cut open the scales of a fir cone, in order to extract the tiny seed with its tongue. These birds are not entirely confined to a vegetable diet, for I once detected a group of them feeding industriously in a small elm tree which was infested with little gray insects, plant-lice or something of the sort. The presence of these insects, in colonies, caused the edges of the leaves to shrivel and curl tightly backward into a protective roll. Close attention showed that the Crossbills were feeding exclusively upon these aphides. They first slit open a leaf-roll with their scissor-bills, then extracted the insects with their tongues, taking care apparently to secure most of the members of each colony before passing to the next. Crossbills also feed to some extent upon the ground, where they pick up fallen seeds and other tidbits. Mr. J. F. Galbraith, a ranger of the Wash- ington Forest Reserve, first called my attention to another purpose which the birds have in visiting the ground. He had noticed how at certain places, and notably where dish-water was habitually thrown, the Crossbills were wont to congregate, and, turning the head sidewise, to thrust out the tongue along the bare ground in a most puzzling manner. Suspeeting at last the real state of affairs, he sprinkled the ground with salt, and upon their return the birds licked it up with great avidity. Mr. Galbraith claims to have tried this experiment successfully upon numerous occasions. The birds do not appear to recognize the salt at first sight, but soon learn to resort to estab- lished salt-licks in open places. Rev. Fred M. McCreary also reports similar habits in connection with certain mineral springs in the Suiattle country. 74 THE WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL. When we recall that the normal food of the Crossbill is pine-seeds, this craving for Nature’s solvent is readily understandable. Crossbills give out an intermittent rattling cry, or excited titter, few, tew, tew, while feeding. They have also a flight note which consists of a short, clear whistle; and a flock composed of separately undulating indi- viduals affords a pleasing sensation to both eye and ear, as it rapidly passes. The male is said to have sprightly whistling notes of a most agreeable char- acter, generically related to that of the Pine Grosbeak, or Purple Finch, but their exhibition must be rather rare. Aiter all, there is something a bit uncanny about these cross-billed creatures, and their eccentricities show nowhere in greater relief than in their nesting habits. The quasi migrations of the bird are determined by the local abundance of fir (or pine) cones. Like their food supply, the birds them- selves may abound in a given section one year and be conspicuously absent the next. Moreover, because there is no choice of season in gathering the seed crop, the birds may nest whenever the whim seizes them; and this they do from January to July, or even October. The communal life is maintained in spite of the occasional defection of love-lorn couples; and there is nothing in the appearance of a flock of Crossbills in April to suggest that other such are dutifuily nesting. Mr. Bowles has never taken the eggs near Tacoma, altho he has encoun- tered half a dozen of their nests in twelve years, the only occupied one of which we have record being found by a friend on the 25th of April, 1899. It contained three half-incubated eggs, and was placed in one of a group of small firs in the prairie country, at an elevation of some twenty feet. The nest rather closely resembles that of the California Purple Finch, but is more compactly built and much more heavily lined. It is composed of twigs and rootlets closely interwoven, and boasts an inner quilt of felted cow-hair nearly half an inch in thickness. The female Crossbill exhibits a singular devotion to duty, once confessed, and in this case the collector had actually to lift her from the eggs in order that he might examine them. No. 26. WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL. A. O. U. No. 522. Loxia leucoptera Gmel. Description.—\ale; Rosy-red or carmine all over, save for grayish of nape and black of scapulars, wings, and tail. The black of scapulars sometimes meets on lower back. Two conspicuous white wing-bars are formed by the tips of the middle and greater coverts. Bill slender and weaker than in preceding THE WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL. 75 species. Female and young: Light olive-yellow, ochraceous, or even pale orange over gray, clearer on rump, duller on throat and belly; most of the feathers with dusky centers, finer on crown and throat, broader on back and breast ; wings and tail as in male, but fuscous rather than black; feather-edgings olivaceous. Very variable. Length 6.00-6.50 (152.4-165.1); wing 3.50 (88.9); tail 2.25 (57-2) a bill 67. (Guz): Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size; crossed bill; conspicuous white wing- bars of both sexes. Nesting.— Vest has not yet been taken in Washington but bird undoubtedly breeds here. “Nest: of twigs and strips of birch-bark, covered exteriorly with moss (Usnea) and lined with soft moss and hair, on the fork of an evergreen, in deep forests. Eggs: 3(?), pale blue, spotted and streaked near larger end with reddish brown and lilac, .80x.55 (20.3x 14)” (Chamberlain). Season: Feb.- March. General Range.—Northern parts of North America and southern Green- land, south into the United States in winter. Resident in coniferous timber thru the entire northern tier of states and irregularly south in the mountains at least to Colorado, Casual in western Europe. Range in Washington.—Several records of occurrences in northern Cas- cade Mountains. Doubtless regular and resident. Authorities.—Dawson, Auk, Vol. XVII. Oct., 1901, p. 403. D?. Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. C. B. TO TELL the truth, no one hereabouts appears to know much about the White-winged Crossbill. It is presumed to be common in the Cascade Mountains, but I have only thrice encountered it: once, May 15, 1891, in the mountains of Yakima County; again, July 23, 1900, on the slopes of Wright's Peak near the head of Lake Chelan; and lastly, on the summit of Cascade Pass, June 25, 1906. ‘There are no other records.* ‘This species is quite as erratic as its more common cousin; and while it is, perhaps, more nearly confined to the mountains, it should be looked for wherever C. minor occurs, and especially in flocks of the latter species. Of the bird’s occurrence in Alaska, where it is much more abundant, Nelson says”: ‘It is more familiar than the Grosbeak [i. e., Pinicola enu- cleator alascensis|, frequently coming low down among the smaller growth, and it is a common sight to see parties of them swinging about in every con- ceivable position from the twigs on the tops of the cottonwoods or birch trees, where the birds are busily engaged in feeding upon the buds. They pay no heed to a passing party of sleds, except, perhaps, that an individual will fly down to some convenient bush, where he curiously examines the strange procession, and, his curiosity satisfied or confidence restored, back he goes to his companions and continues feeding. When fired at they utter a. Since writing the above specimens have been taken at Kirkland by Miss Jennie V. Getty (Dec. 1908). b. Rep. Nat'l Hist. Coll. in Alaska, pp. 174, 175. 76 THE GRAY-CROWNED LEUCOST ICTE. chirps of alarm and call to each other with a long, sweet note, something similar to that of the Goldfinch (Spinus tristis). They keep up a constant cheeping repetition of this note when feeding in parties, and if one of their number is shot the others approach closer and closer to the hunter, and gaze with mingled curiosity and sympathy upon their fluttering companion.” No. 27. GRAY-CROWNED LEUCOSTICTE. A. O. U. No. 524. Leucosticte tephrocotis Swains. Synonyms.—Rosy Fincu. Swarnson’s Rosy Fincu. Description.—Adults: Similar to L. t. littoralis but ashy gray of head re- stricted to sides of crown and occiput—in worn plumages black of crown pro- duced backward to meet brown of hind neck. Seasonal changes as in succeeding. Size of next. Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size; warm brown plumage; ashy gray not encroaching upon sides of head as distinguished from L. t. littoralis. Nesting.—Not known to breed in Washington. ‘Nest made of strips of bark and grass, built in a fissure of a rock at the side of a bunch of grass” (Reed). Eggs: 4 or 5, white. Season: June; one brood. General Range.—Imperfectly made out—probably discontinuous. Reported breeding from such widely separated localities as the Rocky Mountains of British America and the Sierra Nevada and White Mountains of southern Cali- fornia; winters on the eastern slopes of the Rockies and irregularly eastward to western Nebraska, Manitoba, etc., westward to Cascade and Sierra Nevada ranges (Camp Harvey, Ore. Pullman, Wash. Chilliwhack. B. C.). Range in Washington.—Probably of regular occurrence during migrations and in winter east of the Cascade Mountains only. Authorities.—N ot previously reported; W. T. Shaw in epistola, Dec. 31, 1908. Specimens.— Pullman. MOUNTAIN climbing as an art is still in its infancy in the Northwest and altho the Mountaineers and the Mazamas are attacking the situation vigorously we have yet much to learn of the wild life upon our Washington sierras. But what problem could be more fascinating to a lover of birds and mountains than that of working out accurately the distribution of the Rosy Finches in America? They are the mountaineers par excellence, they are the Jebusites of the untaken citadels, and our ignorance of their ways will ere long become a reproach to our vaunted western enterprise. As it stands, THE HEPBURN LEUCOSTICTE. 7 however, only scanty crumbs of information have come to us concerning this most interesting and widely distributed race of Highlanders. The Gray-crowned Leucosticte is considered the central figure of the genus, shading’, as it does, into L. atrata of the Bitterroots and L. australis of Colorado, into L. ¢. littoralis of southern British Columbia, Washington and Oregon, and (perhaps thru littoralis) into griseonucha of the Aleutians. This assumes for the species a center of distribution in the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan where the bird is known to occur. And so because of the greater severity of the winters in its normal haunts this form is found to be the greatest wanderer of its group, being frequently driven in the fall far out upon the central eastern plains or down the “inside passage” between the Rockies and Sierras. It was in this fashion, probably, that a colony of this species became established in the southern Sierras of California, where it now maintains a vigorous existence separated, as we suppose, by at least a thousand miles from the parent stock in British Columbia. No. 28. HEPBURN’S LEUCOSTICTE. A. O. U. No. 524a. Leucosticte tephrocotis littoralis (Baird). Synonyms.—Rosy Fincu. Herppurn’s Rosy Fincu. Barrp’s Rosy Fincu. Description.—Adult male in summer: Forehead and fore-crown black; occiput, broadly, and sides of head, clear ashy gray, color sometimes encroaching on chin and throat; nasal plumules grayish white; remaining plumage in general chestnut, chocolate, or rich vandyke brown, sharply contrasting with ashy gray on hind-neck and sides of head, inclining to blackish on throat, streaked with dusky on back and with more or less admixture of dusky on feather tips, especially on wings and flanks; feathers of upper and under tail-coverts, rump and flanks broadly and distinctly tipped with pink (of variable shade); wings and tail blackish; lesser and middle coverts broadly tipped with pink, the greater coverts, primary coverts and part of the flight feathers edged with pink or light carmine; rectrices with more or less edging of pinkish gray or light brown; bill black; feet and legs black. Adult female: of somewhat paler and duller coloration. Adults in winter: Feathers of back and scapulars edged with light brown; pink edgings of wings, etc., paler, and body plumage, especially on breasty with more or less pale skirting; bill yellow with dusky tip (this character is assumed as early as September). Length of adult male: 6.15 (156.2); wing 4.00 (101.6) ; tail 2.60 (66) ; bill .45 (11.4); tarsus .75 (19). Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size; plumage warm brown with rosy skirt- ings; ashy gray on sides of head as distinguished from L. tephrocotis. a. By “shading” here is not meant subspecific relationship, altho this does obtain as regarding both griseonucha and littoralis, but rather suggestive relationship, assumed divergence from a common stock. 78 THE HEPBURN LEUCOSTICTE. Nesting.—N est: a thick mat of dried grasses placed in sheltered crevice of rock at great altitude. Eggs: Not yet taken but doubtless like those of Leucosticte griseonucha, viz., 4 or 5, pure white; av. size .97x.07 (24.0x17). Season: June; one brood. General Range.—Summer haunts include the higher mountain ranges of southeastern Alaska, British Columbia (west of the Rockies?) and Washington (possibly Oregon as well) ; “in winter south to Nevada, Utah, and Colorado, and east to eastern base of Rocky Mountains (casually to Minnesota), and along the Pacific coast to Kodiak, Sitka, Vancouver Island, etc.”” (Ridgway). Range in Washington.—Breeds thruout the higher Cascades (Wright's Peak, Sahale, Mt. Baker, Mt. Rainier, etc.) and, probably, the Olympics. Re- treats in winter to the lowlands, chiefly east of the Cascade Mountains. Authorities.—? J. K. Lord, Nat. in Y. Id. & B. C. 1866, p. 154. [‘“Hop- burn’s (sic) rosy finch,” Johnson, Rep. Gov. W. T. 1884 (1885), 22.] Dawson, Auk, XIV. 1897, 92, 177. J. E. 4/ Specimens.—P. Prov. E. C. LIVES there a man so brutish that his heart does not kindle when he sees Rainier lit up with the ruddy glow of the evening sacrifice? If such be, bird-] woman who cat there he is no over. Lives therea snows of Kulshan, THE HEPBURN LEUCOSTICTE. 79 purity thereon displayed? If so, she will not appreciate the Leucosticte. This bird is the vestal virgin of the snows, the attendant minister of Nature’s loftiest altars, the guardian of the glacial sanctuaries. One who loves the mountains cannot measure his praise nor bound his enthusiasm. Their sublimity bids him forget his limitations; and if one happens also to care for birds, it is matter of small justice to laud a bird whose devotion to the peaks appears as boundless as his own, besides knowing neither admixture of caution nor limitation of opportunity. Here is the patron saint of mountaineers! He alone of all creatures is at home on the heights, and he is not even dependent upon the scanty vegetation which follows the retreating snows, since he is able to wrest a living from the very glaciers. Abysses do not appall him, nor do the flower-strewn meadows of the lesser heights alienate his snow-centered affections. Taken in Chelan County. Photo by the Author “THE CHILLY WILDERNESS OF SNOW-CLAD PEAKS.” Looking out on the chilly wilderness of snow-clad peaks which confronts Leucosticte on an early day in June, one wonders what the bird sees to justify the assumption of family cares. Save for a few dripping south exposures of inhospitable rock, there is nothing visible which affords promise of food unless it be the snow itself. And when one sees a little company of the 80 THE HEPBURN LEUCOSTICTE, _ finches moving about demurely upon the face of a choppy snowdrift, pecking at the surface here and there, he begins to harbor an uncanny suspicion that the birds do eat snow. Closer examination, however, shows that the surface of all snow-banks, not freshly covered, is sprinkled with insects,—midges, beetles, wasps, and the like—insects which the spring gales have swept up to uncongenial heights and dropped, benumbed or dead with cold. These battered waifs the Leucostictes gather with untiring patience, and they are thus able to subsist as no other species can, up to the very summits. The eggs of the Hepburn Leucosticte have not to our knowledge yet been taken. Mr. D. E. Brown, then of Glacier, found these birds scooping hollows under grass tussocks on the middle slopes of Baker, above timber line, on the 7th of June, 1905. On the 20th of July, 1900, Professor Lynds Jones and myself found a thick-walled grass nest settled upon bare rock without protection, on the south slope of the aiguille of Wright’s Peak, at an elevation of some 9,000 feet, and within a hundred yards of the summit; this could hardly have belonged to any other species. In July, 1907, knowing that it was too late for eggs, I yet spent several days searching the precipitous wall which separates the upper Horseshoe Basin from the glacier which heads Thunder Creek. Adult birds to the number of a dozen gleaned scraps from the dump of the Cascade Mine house; but, altho each made off in business-like fashion when “loaded,” the stretch of the wall was too vast and its recesses too mazy to permit of exact work in tracing. I therefore examined carefully but with difficulty several of the weathered fissures, or couloirs, which ran perpendicularly up the face of the cliff. Here, under cover of rocks which had lodged in the throat of the fissure, or which had weathered out unevenly, old nests were found, simple affairs of coiled grasses, and too dilapidated for exact measurement. From one of these sites a pebble snapped from the finger must have fallen three hundred feet before striking the glacier below. Now and then a passing bird, suspicious of my intent, stopped on some projecting point of rock, to utter the sole note which does duty for every mood, churkk or schthub, a sound comparable only to the concussion of a small taut rope on a flag-pole. Finally, near the top of the Sahale Glacier, I got a line at two hundred yards on an occupied fissure, and traced both parent Leucostictes into its distant recesses. Climbing cautiously up a sharp slope of ice, my footsteps were guided by the almost incessant clamor of young birds. Arrived at the upper lip of the glacier, however, I found that it stood away from the rock-wall some fifteen feet, and that a chasm some forty feet in depth yawned beneath. Into this forbidding bergschrund, one of the fledgling Leucostictes had tumbled. He was not more than two-thirds grown (July 18th) and down feathers still fluttered from his cheeks, but he was a plucky little fellow, and had managed to scramble up off the ice onto a piece DEE Lie P BURN SE COS Pere. 81 of flat rock which caught a bit of the afternoon sun. Here, to judge from his lusty yelping, there could be no doubt that his parents would notice him, altho they would be powerless to secure his further release until his wings were grown. A Carnegie medal hovered suggestively over the spot, I know; but pray, consider,—the rock wall was perpendicular and smooth as glass, the ice-wall I stood on was undercut. No; even philornithy has its limits! Taken tn the Rainier National Parl From a Photograph Copyright, 1908, by W. L \ GLIMPSE OF MT. RAINIER FROM THE NISOUALLY GLACIER A FAVORITE HAUNT OF THE HEPBURN LEUCOSTICTE The nest containing the remaining youngsters was set well back in a rock fissure, concealed by projections eighty feet above the fallen first-born, and inaccessible to man from above or below. With the possible exception of the Black Cloud Swifts (Cypseloides mi share at times these same cliffs, it is safe to say that the Leucostictes are the ger borealis), who are reported t highest nesters on the continent. 82 THE REDPOLL. © No. 29. REDPOLL. A. O. U. No. 528. Acanthis linaria (Linn.). Synonyms.—ComMMon Repro.i. Lesser Reprout. Linnet. Line. Description.—Adult male: Crown crimson; breast and shoulders crimson in varying proportions according to season; frontlet, lores, and throat-patch sooty black; remaining lower parts white, flanks and crissum streaked with dusky ; above, variegated dusky, flaxen-brown and whitish, the feathers having dusky centers and flaxen edgings; rump dusky and white in streaks, tinged with rosy; wings and tail dusky with flaxen or whitish edgings ; two inconspicuous wing-bars formed by white tips of middle and greater coverts. Female: Similar but without red on rump and breast, the latter suffused with buffy instead; sides heavily streaked with dusky. Jmmature: Like female but without crimson crown. Length 5.50 (139.7) or less; wing 2.80 (71.1); tail 2.30 (58.4) ; bill .34 (8.6) ; depth at base .23 (5.8). 5 Recognition Marks.—Warbler to Sparrow size; crimson crown-patch in adults; no dusky spot on breast. Nesting.—Does not breed in Washington. Nest; a bulky affair of twigs and grasses, lined with feathers and placed in trees and bushes. Eggs: 4-6, pale blue, dotted and speckled with reddish brown or umber. Av. size, .65x.50 (16.5 x Tau7 General Range.—Northern portions of northern hemisphere, south irregu- larly in winter, in North America to the Middle States, and southern Oregon. Range in Washington.—Winter resident, abundant on East-side, infrequent or casual west of the Cascades. Migrations.—Nov. 1-Dec. 15. Feb. 15-March 15. Yakima Co. Oct. 31, i899. Chelan March 19, 1896. Authorities.—A:giothus linaria Cab. Cooper and Suckley, Rep. Pac. R. R. Sury. Vol. XII. pt. ii, 1860, 198. C&S. Dt. Ra. D?. Kk. J. B. Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. B. C. P. THOSE who count themselves familiar with the Goldfinch are apt to let the first few flocks of Redpolls pass unquestioned. When, however, in late November, a norther brings down some thousands of these Alaskan waifs, the bird student is roused to attention. The resemblance between the two species is most striking in form and appearance as well as in habit and note. But once the eyes have been assured by a near revelation of convincing red, that Acanthis linaria is before them, the ears remark also a slight foreign accent in the sweetie call and in the rattling flight notes. Redpolls summer abundantly along the coasts of Alaska, and along the higher levels down thru British Columbia. The winter movements of this species are irregular and somewhat confusing. According to Nelson, the EE ——————— "THE REDPOLL. gg western residents retire into the interior of Alaska to winter, where they are able to withstand the fiercest cold. The interior birds retire largely to the south, and under the urgency of bad weather sweep into or thru eastern Washington in immense numbers. ‘There is also a small movement setting in a southwesterly direc- tion, so that some birds winter regularly on Vancouver Is- land, and a few straggle thru the Puget Sound country. While with us, the Red- poll is nowise dependent upon the forests, but appears to seek the more open country by preference. It subsists chiefly upon seeds, gleaning them from the ground with much pleasant chatter, or seeking ; them in their winter —\ receptacles. Redpoll f again proves kinship with Goldfinch by eating thistle seeds, and with Siskin a by his extravagant fondness for the alder catkin. Red- poll’s manner is very confiding; and we are sure that he would not begrudge GR roohs. us a share of his winter viands, if we cared for them. The author is no vege- tarian, but he is bound to admit that a “simple diet of grains, fruits and nuts” makes for contentment among the birds, even at forty below zero. As spring comes on, and the gentle hyperboreans prepare to return to their native heather, we see the deep-dyed crimson of full regalia on crown and breast. But during the actual breeding season, we are told by a com- REDPOLLS IN WINTER. ‘ 84 THE PINE SISKIN. petent observer in Greenland, Holboell, the male not only becomes exceed- ingly shy but loses his rosy coloring. It is hardly to be supposed that this loss of color is a protective measure, but rather that it is the result of the exhaustive labors incident to the season. Nature, in that forbidding clime, cannot afford to dress a busy workman in fine clothes. It is noteworthy in this connection, also, that caged Redpolls lose their rosy tints never to regain them. No. 30. PINE SISKIN A. O. U. No. 533. Spinus pinus (Wils.). Synonyms.—AMERICAN SisKIN. PINE Fincu. Pine LInNet. Description.—Adult male and female: Above brownish buffy; below creamy-buff and whitish; everywhere streaked with dusky or dark olive-brown ; the streakings are finer on the head and foreparts, coarser on back and breast; wings fuscous, the flight feathers sulphur-yellow at the base, and the primaries edged with the same color; tail fuscous, all but the middle feathers sulphur- yellow at base. Bill comparatively slender, acute. Length 4.75-5.00 (120.6-127) ; wing 2.75 (69.9) ; tail 1.80 (45.7); bill .43 (10.9). Recognition Marks.—Warbler size; conspicuous general streakiness, sul- phur-yellow markings of wings and tail, most noticeable in flight. Nesting.—Nest; saddled upon horizontal limb of evergreen tree,,well con- cealed from below, usually at moderate heights; very variable in structure, flimsy to massive and ornate; composed of small twigs (usually fir), and tree-moss, with a lining of fine rootlets and horse- or cow-hair, rarely feathers. An average nest measures externally 414 inches wide by 2'4 in. deep; internally 2 in. wide by 1 in. deep. Eggs: 1-4, usually 3 or 4, pale bluish green lightly dotted with rufous and blackish, chiefly about larger end. Av. size .67x48 (17x12.2). Season: March-September, but most abundant in April; one brood, General Range.—North America at large, breeding in higher latitudes, and in coniferous forests of the West to southern boundary of United States; also sparingly in northeastern United States; irregularly south in winter to Gulf of Mexico. Range in Washington.—In summer coextensive with evergreen timber, but especially common in mountains just below limit of trees; in winter more Jocal- ized, or irregularly absent. Authorities —Chrysomitris pinus Bonap. Baird. Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. pt. II. 1858, p. 425. T. C&S. L*. Rh. D'. D*. Kk, J. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Proy. B. E. P. IN designing the Siskin, Nature achieved another triumph in obscurities. The heavy streaky pattern, worked out in dusky olive on a buffy brown THE, PINE, SISKIN. (9,2) on 7 Taken ut Longmire’s Springs From a Photograph Copyright, 1908, by W. L. Dawson. SIX LITTLE SISKINS. “THE MOUNTAIN’ AS A BACKGROUND base, prepares the bird for self-effacement in any environment; while the sulphur-colored water-mark of the outspread wings barely redeems its owner from sheer oblivion. This remark applies, however, only to plumage. In behavior the Siskin is anything but a forgettable bird-person Whatever be the time of year, Siskins roam about in happy, rollicking bands, comprising from a score to several hundred individuals. They move with energy in the communal flight, while their incessant change of relative positions in flock suggests those intramolecular vibrations of matter, which THE PINE SISKIN. 87 Siskin. Its breeding range coincides with the distribution of evergreen timber; its feeding forays include all alder trees; and roving bands are likely to turn up anywhere in eastern Washington, if there is shrubbery larger or greener than sage-brush at hand. Much of Siskin’s food is obtained upon the ground. City lawns are favorite places of resort; these birds, together with California Purple Finches, appearing to derive more benefit from grass plots, whether as granaries or insectaria, than does any other species. They share also with Crossbills a strong interest in the products of fir trees, whether in cone or leaf. ‘Their peculiar province, however, is the alder catkin, and the tiny white seeds obtained from this source are the staple supply of winter. Mr. Brown, of Glacier, has examined specimens in which the crops were distended by these seeds exclusively. While the observer is ogling, it may be an over- modest Townsend Sparrow, a flock of Pine Siskins will charge incontinently into the alders above his very head. With many sews and seems they fall to work upon the stubborn catkins, poking, twisting, prying, standing on their heads if need be, to dig out the dainty dole. Now and then, without any apparent reason, one detachment will suddenly desert its claim and settle upon another, precisely similar, a few feet away; while its place will be taken, as likely as not, by a new band, charging the tree like a volley of spent shot. Nesting time with the Siskin extends from March to September, and the parental instinct appears in the light of an individual seizure, or decimating epidemic, rather than.as an orderly taking up of life’s duties. Smitten couples drop out from time to time from the communal groups, and set up temporary establishments of their own; but there is never any let-up in the social whirl on the part of those who are left; and a roistering company of care-free maids and bachelors en fete may storm the very tree in which the first lullabies are being crooned by a hapless sister. Once in a while congenial groups agree to retire together, and a single tree or a clump of neighbors may boast a half-a-dozen nests; tho which is which and what is whose one cannot always tell, for the same intimacy which suggested simultaneous marriage, allows an almost unseemly interest in the private affairs of a neighbor. Once embarked upon the sea of matrimony, the female is a very deter- mined sitter, and the male is not inattentive. In examining the nest of a sitting bird one may expect the mother to cover her eggs at a foot’s remove. without so much as by-your-leave. The nest, in our experience, is invariably built in an evergreen tree, usually a Douglas spruce (Pseudotsuga mucronata), and is commonly saddled upon a horizontal or slightly ascending limb at some distance from the tree trunk. Viewed from below, it appears merely as an accumulation of material at the base of divergent twigs, where moss and waste is wont to gather. THE PINE SISKIN to distance from the ground, it may vary from four to a hundred feet ‘ tter is the limit of investigation, but there is no particular reason t ypose they do not go higher Most of the nests are placed at from eight twent feet up : . , as 7 oeriae i Che materials used in construction are dead hr-twigs, weed-stall strips cedar-bark, mosses of several sorts, grass, fir, hair, plant d ns, et Phe } ; 1] ] ‘ ] ' erior m pe carerully mer with fine 1 ets rur lors¢ lil I¢ ers +] t ) avy tT ] ] ] ; ] 1 rey ' ~ r S grea rl potn l late i { orkmans ) ri¢ ts pear little better than those of Chipping Sparrows ile the best t certal e distinguished ( wit t the eggs) from the elegant crea tions of the Audubor many more. The brood does not remain long in a family group but joins ing clan as soon as possible. We suspect, therefore, that the Siskin es it one brood i seas d she undoubtedly heaves a sigh of ‘ hen she may again don her evening gown, and rejoin “society THE WESTERN GOLDFINCH. _ Bo No. 31. WESTERN GOLDFINCH. A. O. U. No. 529a. Astragalinus tristis pallidus (Mearns). Synonyms.—PaLe GornprincH. ‘“Witp Canary.” “SUMMER YELLOW- BIRD.” ‘THISTLE-BIRD. Description.—Adult male in summer: General plumage clear lemon or canary yellow; crown patch, including forehead and lores, black; wings black, varied by white of middle and lesser coverts, tips of greater coverts and edges of secondaries ; tail black, each feather with white spot on inner web; tail coverts broadly tipped with white ; bill-orange, tipped with black; feet and legs light brown; irides brown. Adult female im summer: Above grayish brown or olivaceous ; wings and tail dusky rather than black, with white markings rather broader than in male; below whitish with buffy or yellow suffusion brightest on throat and -sides. Adult male m winter: Like adult female but brighter by virtue of con- trasting black of wing and tail; white markings more extended than in summer. Female in winter: not so yellow as in summer, grayer and browner with more extensive white. Young: Like winter adults but browner, no clear white any- where, cinnamomeus instead. Length of adult male: (skins) 4.71 (120); wing 2:95, (75); tail 197, (50); bill’ 4x (o!4)\; tarsus -55 (14.2). Recognition Marks.—Warbler size; black and yellow contrasting, with conical bill, distinctive; undulating flight; canary-like notes. Feeds on thistle seed as does also Spinus pinus, a closely related but much less handsome species. Nesting.—Nest: A beautiful compact structure of vegetable fibers, “hemp,” grasses, etc., lined with vegetable cotton or thistle-down, and placed at varying heights in trees or bushes, usually in upright crotches. Eggs: 3-6, pale bluish white, unspotted. Av. size, .65 x.52 (16.5 x 13.2). Season: July and August; one brood. General Range.—Western United States, except the Pacific coast district, north to British Columbia and Manitoba, south to northern and eastern Mexico. Range in Washington.—East-side, not common resident in half-open situa- tions and along streams; resident but roving in winter. Authorities.—Chirysomitris tristis, Brewster, B. N. O. C. VII. Oct. 1882, [oy 2A (CR) |5 IDEA IDES Sip-caS cei. Specimens.—P. Prov. C. “HANDSOME is that handsome does,” we are told, but the Goldfinch fulfils both conditions in the proper sense, and does not require the doubtful apology of the proverb, which was evidently devised for plain folk. One is at a loss to decide whether Nature awarded the Goldfinch his suit of fine clothes in recognition of his dauntless cheer or whether he is only happy because of his panoply of jet and gold. At any rate he is the bird of sun- shine the year around, happy, careless, free. Rollicking companies of them rove the country-side, now searching the heads of the last year’s mullein 90 THE WESTERN GOLDFINCH. stalks and enlivening their quest with much pleasant chatter, now scattering in obedience to some whimsical command and sowing the air with their laughter. Perchic'-opee or perchic’-ichic’-opee, says every bird as it glides down each successive billow of its undulating flight. So enamored are the Goldfinches of their gypsy life that it is only when the summer begins to wane that they are willing to make particular choice of mates and nesting spots. As late as the middle of July one may see roving bands of forty or fifty individuals, but by the first of August they are usually settled to the task of rearing young. The nesting also appears to be dependent in some measure upon the thistle crop. When the weeds are common and the season forward, nesting may commence in June; but so long as thistle down is scarce or wanting, the birds seem loath to begin. Nests are placed in the upright forks of various kinds of saplings, or even of growing plants, in which latter case the thistle, again, proves first choice. The materials used are the choicest obtainable. Normally the inner bark of hemp is employed for warp, and thistle-down for woof and lining, so that the whole structure bleaches to a characteristic silver-gray. In the absence or scarcity of these, grasses, weeds, bits of leaves, ete., are bound together with cobwebs, and the whole felted with other soft plant-downs, or even horse-hair. The whole is made fast thruout its depth to the support- ing branches, and forms one of the most durable of summer's trophies. From four to six, but commonly five, eggs are laid, and these of a delicate greenish blue. Fourteen days are required for hatching; and from the time of leaving the nest the youngsters drone babee! babee! with weary iteration, all thru the stifling summer day. During the nesting season the birds subsist largely upon insects of various kinds, especially plant-lice, flies, and the smaller grasshoppers; but at other times they feed almost exclusively upon seeds. They are very fond of sunflower seeds, returning to a favorite head day after day until the crop is harvested. Seeds of the lettuce, turnips, and other garden plants are levied upon freely where occasion offers; but thistle seed is a staple article, and that is varied by a hundred seeds besides, which none could grudge them. Thruout the winter the Western Goldfinches are much less in evidence, the majority of them having retired to the southland at that season. Those which remain are somewhat altered to appearance: the wings and tail show much pure white, and the yellow proper is now confined to the throat and the sides of the head and neck. He is thus a lighter and a brighter bird than his eastern brother. But the western bird has the same merry notes and sprightly ways which have made the name of Goldfinch synonymous with sunshine. THE WILLOW GOLDFINCH. gt No. 32. WILLOW GOLDFINCH. A. O. U. No. 529b. Astragalinus tristis salicamans (Grinnell). Synonyms.—CALIFORNIA GOLDFINCH. ‘““YELLOW-BIRD,” etc. Description.—Similar to A. t. pallidus, but wings and tail shorter and colora- tion very much darker; adult male in summer plumage has tinge of pale olive- green on back, while winter adults and young are decidedly darker and browner than corresponding plumage of 4. t. pallidus. Wing (of adult male) 2.75 (70); tail 1.73 (44). Recognition Marks.—As in preceding but decidedly darker and browner, especially in winter. Nesting.—As in 4. ft. pallidus. General Range.—Pacific coast district from Lower California (Cerros Id.) north to British Columbia. Has been taken at Okanagan. Landing, B. C. (Brooks). Range in Washington.—Not common resident on West-side only, chiefly in cultivated valleys. Authorities——Chrysomutris tristis Bon. Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1850; 420, 422 part. C&S) L2 Kb: Ra: Kk. B. E. Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. B. E. sOLDFINCHES are a bit of a rarity on Puget Sound. Of course we see them every season, and one may see a great deal of a particular troop, once its general range is ascertained; but, taken all in all, the bird is not common. Neither Cooper nor Suckley saw this Goldfinch, altho particularly wondering at its absence. The clearing of the forests and the cultivation of the soil is conducive to its increase, however; and there is every reason to believe that we are seeing more of it year by year. There has been a warm discussion as to the subspecific validity of the Willow Goldfinch, but those who see birds of this form in late winter or early spring cannot but be impressed with the striking brownness of its plumage, as well as by the more extensive white upon the wings, as compared with the eastern bird. Beyond its partiality for willow trees, it has no further distinguishing traits, unless, perhaps, it may be reckoned less tuneful, or noisy. g2 THE CASSIN PURPLE FINCH. No. 33. CASSIN’S PURPLE FINCH. A. O. U. No. 518. Carpodacus cassinii Baird. Synonym.—Cassin’s FIncH. Description.—Adu/t male: Crown dull crimson; back and scapulars vinace- ous mixed with brownish and sharply streaked with dusky; wings and tail dusky with more or less edging of vinaceous; remaining plumage chiefly dull rosy, passing into white on belly and crissum; under tail-coverts white streaked with dusky. Adult female: Everywhere (save on wings, tail and lower abdomen) sharply streaked with dusky, clearly, on a white ground, below; above on an olive- gray or olive-buffy ground. Jmmature male: Like female in plumage and indis- tinguishable. Length of adult 6.50-7.00 (165.1-177.8) ; wing 3.62 (92) ; tail 2.56 (65); bill .50 (12.6); tarsus .73 (18.5). Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size: red of crown contrasting with back dis- tinctive as compared with C. p. californicus; general streakiness of female (and male in more common plumage). Nesting.—Nest: of twigs and rootlets lined with horse-hair, string, etc., placed in pine or fir tree well out from trunk. Eggs: 4 or 5, colored as in succeed- ing species; a little larger. Av. size .85 x .60 (21.6% 15.2). Season: June; one or two broods according to altitude. General Range.—Western United States from the eastern base of the Rocky Mountains west to (but not including?) the Pacific coast district; north to British Columbia; south over plateau region of Mexico; found chiefly in the mountains. Range in Washington.—At least coextensive with pine timber in eastern Washington; found to summit of Cascades but westerly range imperfectly made out. Authorities.—[“Cassin’s Purple Finch,” Johnson, Rep. Gov. W. T. 1884 (1885), 22.] Carpodacus cassini, Dawson, Auk, Vol. XIV. 1897, p. 177. D*. J. Specimens.— roy. C. CASSIN’S FINCH is the bird of the eastern Cascades and the timbered foothills of northern Washington. While ranging higher than other finches, it shares with them an inclination to urban life, and a full realization of the advantages of gardens and cultivated patches. At Stehekin I saw a flock of them gleaning crumbs as complacently as sparrows, in the yard at the rear of the hotel. At Chelan they haunt the lonesome pine trees which still dot the shores of the lake, seemingly regarding their gnarled recesses as citadels where alone they may be safe from the terrors of the open country. As the bird-man lay sprawling in the grateful shadow of one of these grim sentinels, munching a noonday lunch, and remonstrating with Providence at the unguarded virtues of the all-crawling ant, he spied a last year’s Oriole’s nest hanging just over his head, while an accommodating Cassin Finch THE CASSIN PURPLE FINCH. 93 called his attention to this year’s nest in process of construction, by going over and helping herself to a beakful of material, which she pulled out of the structure by main force. She evened things up, however, (for the bird-man) by immediately visiting her own nest, pitched on the upper side of a horizontal branch near the end. This female Cassin was a wearisome bird, for she sat and twittered inanely, or coaxed, every minute her husband was in the tree. He, poor soul, was visibly annoyea at her indolence, not to say her wantonness, and had as little to do with her as possible. However, he was a young fellow, without a bit of red on him, and he should not have been over-critical of his first mate in honey- moon, On the pine-clad slopes of Cannon Hill in Spokane, there is no more familiar sound in June than the wanton note of the female Cassin Finch, oreé-eh, oreé-ch, delivered as often as not with quivering wings, and unmistakably inviting the attentions of the male. Perhaps it is fair to call this a love note, but it is delivered with the simper- ing insistence of a spoiled child. The sight of a singing male in high plumage is memorable. He selects a position at the tip of a GRCCING INGE pine branch, or perhaps on a bunch of cones at the very top of the tree, and throws himself into the work. His color, crimson, not purple, is pure and clear upon the crown only: elsewhere, upon nape, shoulders, and breast, it presents merely a suffu- sion of red. A song heard near Chelan was much like that of a California Purple Finch in character, but less musical and more chatter ing, with the exception of one strong note thrown in near the close. This note was very like the characteristic squeal of the Evening Grosbeak, gimp, or thkimp, out of all keeping with the remainder unquestionably borrowed. The Cassin Finch is quite as successful as a mimic as his cousin from 04 THE CALIFORNIA PURPLE BINCH. California. Besides his own wild, exultant notes, he rapidly strings together those of other birds, and renders the whole with the spontaneity and some- thing of the accent of the Lark Sparrow. Indeed, when I first heard one sing on a crisp May morning on the banks of the Columbia, I thought I was hearing a rare burst of the latter bird, so much of its song had been appropri- ated by the Finch. Besides this, strains of Western Vesper Sparrow, Moun- tain Bluebird, and Louisiana Tanager were recognized. CALIFORNIA PURPLE FINCH. No. 34. A. O. U. No. 517a. Carpodacus purpureus californicus [aird. Description.—Adult male: General body plumage rich crimson or rosy red, clearest on crown and upper tail-coverts, more or less mingled with dusky on back and scapulars, passing into white on crissum and under tail-coverts; wings and tail brownish dusky with reddish edgings. Bill and feet brownish. Adult female: Above olive dusky in streaks, with edging or gloss of brighter olivaceous ; underparts whitish, everywhere, save on middle abdomen, crissum and under tail- coverts, streaked with olive dusky, finely on throat, broadly on breast and sides, shading into pattern of upperparts on sides of head, neck and chest. Immature male, and male in ordinary(?) plumage: exactly like female in coloration. Length about 5.75 (146); wing 3.07 (78); tail 2.28 (58); bill .45 (11.5); tarsus 770'(01,7.0) Recognition Marks.—‘ Warbler size” but sturdier, an unmistakable sparrow ; rosy coloration of male distinctive (without crossed mandibles) but streaky pattern oftenest seen. Distinguishable from the Pine Siskin (Spinus pinus) by larger size, more sedate ways and absence of sulphury wing- and tail-markings. Nesting.—Nest: well built, of fir twigs, heavily lined with green moss, horse-hair, string, etc.; placed in tree (deciduous or evergreen) at elevation of 5-40 feet and usually at some distance from trunk; measures outside 5 in. wide by 3 in. deep, inside 21% in. wide by 114 in. deep. Eggs: 4 or 5, light greenish blue, spotted and streaked with violaceous and black, chiefly about the larger end. Round ovate to elongate ovate; varying in dimensions from .75 x .56 (19 x 14.2) to .g1x.59 (22.8x15). Season: first week in May and first week in June; two broods. General Range.—Pacific coast district from southern California north to British Columbia (including Vancouver Island). More or less resident thruout range but drifts (casually?) to southeastward in Arizona during migrations. Range in Washington.—West-side, chiefly at lower levels; especially partial to orchards and cultivated sections. Irregularly resident but numbers augmented in spring. Authorities.—Carpodacus californicus Baird, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, 414. T. C&S. L2. Rh. Kb. Ra. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. P. B. BN. E. THE CALIFORNIA PURPLE FINCH. 95 OF the streaked, streaky is this demure and inoffensive bird in the olivaceous plumage, in which we usually see him, and always see her. But the sharpness and magnitude of the dusky streaks above and below confer a measure of distinction, even when there is no trace of the adult crimsons, miscalled purple. This finch is a familiar object about the gardens, orchards, and parks in Western Washington. It moves about for the most part silently, inspecting birds and flowers, sampling fruit, or gleaning seeds from the ground in company with its own kind, or with the humbler and equally streaked Siskins. While not altogether dependent upon human bounty, it probably owes more to-man than does any other native species. Wright’s Park, in Tacoma, appears to lead the state by two weeks in the early budding of its flowering plants, and here Purple Finches appear to the best advantage. In the luxuriant bushes of the red flowering currant (Ribes sangiineum) one may see them feeding during the last week of March. The Finches pluck the flowers assiduously, and either eat the fleshy part at the base, the tender ovary, or else press out the nectar just above, or both. A flower is first plucked off whole and held in the bill, while the bird appears to smack its lips several times; then the crimson corolla is allowed to drop upon the ground, which thus becomes carpeted with rejected beauty. Like many related species, the California Finch is rather unwary, so that one may study his behavior at close range. 3ecause the Purple Finch is usually so unobtrusive, we are startled at the first outburst of spring song. Nothing more spontaneous could be desired, and the mellow, musical yodelling of this bird is one of the choicest things allowed us on the West-side. ‘The song is midway between a trill and a carol, and has a wild quality which makes it very attractive. The notes are so limpid and penetrating that one is sometimes deceived as to the distance of the singer, supposing him to be in a neighboring copse when, in truth, he occupies a distant fir-top. Cheedooreédooreé dooreé dooreé dooreé dooreé dooree dreeetoreet may afford an idea of the rolling, rollicking character of the song, but is, of course, absurdly inadequate. A master singer among the Purple Finches once entertained us from the top of a fir tree a hundred feet high. He was in the dull plumage, that is, without red; and altho he sang briskly at intervals we were not prepared for any unusual exhibition of vocal powers on his part. It was a long time, therefore, before we put the cry of a distant Steller Jay up to him. Our suspicions once aroused, however, we caught not only the Steller Jay cry, unmistakably, but also half a dozen others in swift and dainty succession, after the usual Purple Finch prelude. I clearly recognized notes of the Flicker, Steller Jay, Canary, American Crossbill, and Seattle Wren. These imitative efforts varied in correctness of execution, and came to us with the 96 THE ENGLISH SPARROW. ; distance of the original singer plus that of the Finch, so that the result was not a little confusing, tho very delightful when explained. During courtship this Finch will execute an aerial song-dance, consisting of sundry jerks and crazy antics, interspersed with a medley of ecstatic notes; at the conclusion of which he will make a suggestive dive at his fianceé, who meanwhile has been poking fun at him. For some reason nests have been exceedingly hard to find. Many birds are always pottering about with no apparent concern for nesting time, and Mr. Bowles hazards that they do not mate until the third year. Apropos of this, one remarks the scarcity of highly plumaged males at all seasons. I have gone six months at a time, where Finches were not uncommon, without seeing a single red bird. In fact, I never found the latter common except in the vicinity of Tacoma. Nests are placed, preferably, near water, in evergreen or deciduous trees, and at heights varying from six to forty feet. They usually occur on a bough at some distance from the trunk of a supporting tree, seldom or never being found in a crotch. Composed externally of fir twigs, they are lined copiously with green moss, horse-hair, and string, and contain four or five handsome blue-green eggs, spotted and dashed with violet and black. Two broods are probably brought off in a season, the first about the 20th of May and the second a month later. lingering lan guor of the Southland: and if the gentle man addressed you, you would expect him to say “Sah,” with a soft cadence The. bird’s carol has the rolling quality which serves to connect it with that of the THE GROSBEARK’S CONCERT HALI eastern Rose breasted Grosbeak, but it is sweeter, more varied, and shows, if anything, a still more strongly marked undertone of liquid harmonics The male Grosbeak is, moreover, an indefatigable singer, choosing for his purpose the topmost sprays of alder or cottonwood, and taking pains to give all intruders a wide berth during the concert hours. His attachment to a given locality becomes apparent only after he has been pursued from tree to tree in a wide circuit which brings up at the original station. And THE BLACK-HEADED GROSBEAK. 169 yet his shyness is not inspired by caution, for he will sing upon the nest when he spells his wife at the hopeful task of incubation. The more matter-of-fact female has no word of greeting for the stranger beyond a sharp kimp, a beak-clearing note, not unlike that of a chicken with a crumb in its throat. This the male repeats also, with all shades of emphasis when the home is beset, or, as a last resort, he breaks into song at close quarters,—an ample price, surely, for the fullest immunity. It is the nest which confirms the southern origin of these gentle birds. It is a flimsy affair of twigs, grass- stems, or weed stalks carelessly 1n- terlaced, and caught in the crotch of a sapling at a height of from five to fifteen feet. The construction is so open, that the blue eggs with their dark brown and lavender spottings may be counted from below. The birds, you see, have been accus- tomed to a warmer climate, to a tropical range, in fact, where warmth of bedding is no object. Taken in Oregon. Photo by Finley and Bohiman. If found upon the REALIZATION. nest, the brooding bird cannot think ill of you; or, if there is ground for misgiving, seeks to disarm hostility by a display of gentle confidence. Instances are of record where the sitting bird has been stroked with the hand, and a little discretion will usually insure a lasting friendship. This species enjoys a wide range in Washington, being found from tide-water to the upper reaches of the deeper mountain valleys; but it is nowhere common enough, let alone abundant. 170 THE CRIMSON-HEADED TANAGER. | No. 69. CRIMSON-HEADED TANAGER. A. O. U. No. 607. Piranga ludoviciana (Wils.). Synonyms.—LouIsIANaA TANAGER. WESTERN TANAGER. Description.— wonderfully compacted affair of moss, both green and I f the whole, for liverworts, dried grasses, soft weed fibers, and cow-hait of the nest cup scarcely mars the sphericity o brought well in; so much so, in fact, that a containing branch ove foliage upon one side, once tipped half way over without spill 1 feathers of The deep cavity is heavily lined with cow-hair and abundan rloadec l ing the egg 205 1 ‘spersed with The deep depressi 1 e edges are with WESTERN GOLDEN-CROWNED KINGLET NEST OF THE MOST THAT MAY BE SI grouse or domestic fowl. These feathers are placed with their soft ends pro truding, and they curl over the entrance in such fashion as almost or quite to the eggs. CO iceal fervors of description can overstate the beauties of this Kinglet palace Eges vary in number from five to nine, seven and eight being the rule once took a nest with eleven—one too many at the least, for it had to rest on top of the others. They are not much larger than Hummingbirds’ and quite as fragile. Mr. Bowles consumed twenty minutes in removing the con without a break. The eggs var\ ) its of the big nest to the collecting box One would like to particularize at great length, for no 206 THE WESTERN GOLDEN-CROW NED KINGLET. color from pure white to sordid white and dusky brown. In the last two cases the tint may be due to a profusion of fine brown dots, or to advancement in incubation, the shell being so thin that the progressive stages of the chick’s development are dimly shadowed thru tt The female Kinglet is a close sitter and will not often leave the nest until the containing branch is sharply tapped. Then, invariably, she drops down a couple of feet and flits sharply sidewise, with manifest intent to deceive the laggard eye. Yet almost immediately she is minded to return, and will do so if there is no further demonstration of hostilities. Re-covering the eggs is not SS always an easy matter, for the well is deep and the mouth narrow. One dame lighted on the brim of her nest and bowed and scraped and stamped, precisely is a carefully disciplined husband will when he brings muddy boots to the kitchen door, The operation was evidently quite unconnected with hesitation in view of my presence, but in some way was preparatory to her sinking carefully into the feather-lined pit before her. When she first covered the ggs, also, there was a great fuss made in settling, as tho to free her feathers from the engaging edges of the nest. When the bird is well down upon her eggs there is nothing visible but the top of her head and the tip of her tail. The male bird, meanwhile, is not indifferent. First he bustles up onto the nesting branch and flashes his fiery crest in plain token of anger, but later he is content to squeak disapprov- ai from a_ position more removed While the mother bird is. sitting, the male tends her faith- fully, but he spends his spare moments, according to Mr Bowles, in construct- ing “‘cock nests,” or " | decoys, in the neigh- 12 J "> boring trees Chese seem to serve no pur- pose bevond that of a nervous relief to he impatient father, and are seldom as carefully constructed as the veritable ; lomus. When the young of the first brood are hatched and ready to fly, the hief care of them falls to the father, while the female prepares for a second nesting \s to the further domestic relations one cannot speak with certainty, THE RUBY-CROWNED KINGLET. 267 but it would seem at least possible that fall bird troops consist of the combined families of Mr. and Mrs. Quiverful. As to the time of home-making, the Kinglets are not very particular. Nor is it necessary that they should be. It is always spring here after the first of February. Besides that, a fir tree is both forest and store-house at any season. In the vicinity of T'acoma, the usual nesting time is the last week in April for the first set, and the second week in June for the second. ‘The earliest record is April 9th, that of a nest containing half-grown young. The first egg of this set must, therefore, have been deposited about March 15th. So far as we can make out, this bird is strictly resident in western Wash- ington, but it is much less common on the east side of the Cascades, and is there largely migratory. Not only does the species retire in winter from the mountains to the lower foot-hills, but considerable numbers pass over the State to and from British Columbia. At such times they appear wherever timber or watered shrubbery is to be found. With manners so engaging and lives so sheltered, to say nothing of families so blessed in the yearly increase, is it any wonder that the gentle tribe of Regulus prevails thruout the giant forests of this western slope, and spills over in blessing wherever trees abound ? No. 104. RUBY-CROWNED KINGLET. A. O. U. No. 749. Regulus calendula (Linn.). Description.—4Adu/t male: Above olive-green, duller anteriorly, brightening to greenish yellow on edgings of quills and tail-feathers; a partly concealed crest of scarlet (flame-scarlet to scarlet-vermilion) ; two narrow, whitish wing-bars formed by tips of middle and greater coverts; some whitish edging on tertials; a dusky interval separating greenish yellow edges on outer webs of secondaries; a whitish eye-ring and whitish skirtings around base of bill; under parts soiled white, heavily tinged with buffy and olivaceous buff. Adult female and immature: Similar but without crown-patch. Length 4.00-4.50 (101.6-114.3); wing 2.33 (59.2); tail 1.72 (43.7); bill from nostril .25 (6.4). Recognition Marks.—Pygmy size; scarlet crest distinctive. Note wing-bars and whitish eye-ring of female and young. Lighter than R. ¢. grinnelli. Nesting.—Nest: a ball of moss, lichens, etc., bound together with cobwebs, and lashed to drooping twigs beneath branch of conifer, lined with vegetable- down, catkins, hair, and feathers, and placed at moderate heights. Eggs: 5-9, dull white, or pale buffy, faintly or sharply but sparingly speckled with reddish brown, chiefly about larger end. Av. size, .55x.43 (14x10.9). Season: June; one brood( ?). General Range.—North America at large in wooded districts, north to timit 268 THE RUBY-CROWNED KINGLET. of trees, west to northwestern Alaska (Kowak River), breeding chiefly north of the United States, and irregularly in the higher ranges of the West. Range in Washington.—Common spring and fall migrant; summer resident in northeastern portion of State only(?). Migrations.—Spring: April, May. Fall: October. Authorities.—Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. pt. Il. 1858, p. 227. (T.) C&§. Lt. Rh.(?) D" Sr. Ra. D?. Kk. J. E. Specimens.—U. of W. P'. Prov. B. BN. E. “WHERE’S your kingdom, little king? Where's the land you call your own? Where’s your palace and your throne? Fluttering lightly on the wing Thru the blossom world of May Whither lies your royal way? Where's the realm that owns your sway, Little King?” Dr. Henry Van Dyke is the questioner, and the little bird has a ready answer for him. Being an Easterner, it is “Labrador” in May, and “Where the cypress’ vivid green And the dark magnolia’s sheen Weave a shelter round my home” in October. But under the incitement of the poet’s playful banter, the Kinglet enlarges his claim: Never king by right divine Ruled a richer realm than mine! What are lands and golden crowns, Armies, fortresses and towns, Jewels, scepters, robes and rings, What are these to song and wings? Everywhere that I can fly There I own the earth and sky: Everywhere that I can sing There I’m happy as a king.” And surely there is no one who can meet this dainty monarch in one of his happy moods without paying instant homage. His imperium is that of the spirit, and those who boast a soul above the clod must swear fealty to this most delicate expression of the creative Infinite, this thought of God made luminous and vocal, and own him king by right divine. It seems only yesterday I saw him, Easter Day in old Ohio. The sig- THE RUBY-CROWNED KINGLET. 266 nificant dawn was struggling with great masses of heaped-up clouds,—the incredulities and fears of the world’s night; but now and again the invincible sun found some tiny rift and poured a flood of tender gold upon a favored spot where stood some solitary tree or expectant sylvan company. Along the river ban‘ all was still. There were no signs of spring, save for the modest springing violet and the pious buckeye, shaking its late-prisoned fronds to the morning air, and tardily setting in order its manifold array of Easter candles. The oak trees were gray and hushed, and the swamp elms held their peace until the fortunes of the morning should be decided. Suddenly from down the river path there came a tiny burst of angel music, the peerless song of the Ruby-crown. Pure, ethereal, without hint of earthly dross or sadness, came those limpid welling notes, the sweetest and the gladdest ever sung—at least by those who have not suffered. It was not indeed the greeting of the earth to the risen Lord, but rather the annunciation of the glorious fact by heaven’s own appointed herald. The Ruby-crowned Kinglet has something of the nervousness and vivaci- ty of the typical wren. It moves restlessly from twig to twig, flirting its wings with a motion too quick for the eyes to follow, and frequently uttering a titter of alarm, chit-tit or chit-it-it. During migrations the birds swarm thru the tree-tops like Warblers, but are often found singly or in small com- panies in thickets or open clusters of saplings. In such situations they exhibit more or less curiosity, and if one keeps reasonably still he is almost sure to be inspected from a distance not exceeding four or five feet. It is here too that the males are found singing in spring. The bird often begins sotto voce with two or three high squeaks as tho trying to get the pitch down to the range of mortal ears before he gives his full voice. The core of the song is something like few, tew, tew, tew, titooreet’, titoorect’, the last phrases being given with a rising inflection, and with an accent of ravishing sweetness. The tones are so pure that they may readily be whistled by the human listener, and a musical contest provoked in which one is glad to come out second best. Having heard only the preparatory spring song for years, it was a matter of considerable rejoicing to come upon the birds at home in Stevens County. They were especially common in the neighborhood of Newport, and they sang incessantly and loudly from the depths of the giant larches, which abound there. It appears that the full-fledged breeding song is quite different from the delicate migratory carol. ‘The preliminary notes are of much the same quality, but instead of accenting the final syllable of the titooreet phrase, and repeating this, the phrase is given only once, with a sort of tittering, tremolo effect, and the emphasis is thrown upon a series of strong, sharp terminal notes, four or five in number, and of a uniform character—the whole some- what as follows: few tew tew tew titteretteretter reet, cheep’ cheep’ cheep’ 27 THE RUBY-CROWNED KINGLET. cheep. These emphatic notes are also rendered in a detached form at oc- casional intervals, usually after the entire song has been rehearsed ; and they are so loud at all times as to be heard at a distance of half a mile. One indi- vidual began his song with an elaborate preliminary run of high-pitched, whining notes of a fineness almost beyond human cognizance; then Range in Washington; : tain valleys and among the foo : in ‘the larger cities. = Migrations.—Spring: “About the foth of May” (Suckley)*; now at jaa March: Chelan, March #7, 1856; Seattl, March 24, 1906; Tacoum, March 107 5 March 4, 1908; Olympia, Februanp 27( 7), 18g7. Authorities.—? Ornith. Com. Ac. Nat. Sei. Phila, VIL, 3393 Oe River). Hirwnde thalassina Swainson, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. 7 pt 838, pgi2. T. C&S. Lt. Rb. D:. D*. Sst, Kk. J. BEY Specimens.—( U. of W.) Prov. P'. C. E- TO appear to the best advantage this dainty sky-child should he seen on. a bright day, when the livid green of back and crown may reflect the glancing rays of the sun with a delicate golden sheen. At such a time, if one is clam * bering about the walls of some.rugged granite cliff of the lower Cascades, he _ feels as if the dwellers of Olympus had come down in appropriate guise te a. Cooper and Suckley, Rep Pac. BR. R. Surv, XIL, pt. UL, 1860, p. 185. S\rargy oye THE VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW. 347 inquire his business. Not, however, that these lovely creatures are either meddlesome or shrewish. Even when the nest is threatened by the strange presence, the birds seem unable to form any conception of harm, and pursue their way in sunny disregard. Especially pleasing to the eye is the pure white of the bird’s underparts, rising high on flanks and cheeks and sharply contrasting with the pattern of vio- let and green, in such fashion that, if Nature had invited us to “remold it nearer to the heart’s desire,’ we must have declined the task. Before the advent of the white man upon Puget Sound, these birds commonly nested in deserted wood- pecker holes and in natural cavities of trees, while upon the East-side they nested (and still do to a large extent) upon the granite or lava cliffs. In the last-named situations they utilize the rocky clefts and in accessible crannies, and are espec- Taken dn Oregon. Photo by Finley and Bohiman. tally fond of the smaller vapor holes YOUNG VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW. which characterize the basaltic for- mations. Favorable circumstances may attract a considerable colony, to the number of a hundred pairs or more, but even so it is not easy to find a getatable nest. If one is able to reach the actual nesting site, the mouth of the ancient gas-vent which the birds have chosen for a home may prove too small to admit the hand. Thruout the State, however, and especially upon the West-side, these exquisite birds are forsaking their ancient haunts and claiming protection of men. Already they have become common in larger cities, where they occupy bird-boxes and crannies of buildings. South Tacoma, being nearest to their old oak nurseries, is quite given over to them, and it is a pretty sight on a sunny day in April to see them fluttering about the cottages inspecting knot- holes and recessed gables or, in default of such conveniences, daintily voicing their disapproval of such neglect on the part of careless humans. In these birds and in the Barn Swallows, the well known twittering and creaking notes of Swallows most nearly approach the dignity of song Indeed, Mr. Rathbun contends that the song heard at close quarters is a really creditable affair, varied, vivacious, and musical. The Violet-greens are somewhat less hardy or venturesome than the Tree Swallows, arriving usually during the last week in March. Last year’s 348 "THE BOHEMIAN WAXWING. nesting site becomes at once the spring rendezvous, but the duties of maternity are not seriously undertaken until about the 1st of June. At the head of Lake Chelan some twenty pairs of these Swallows, having left the old nest- ing cliff a mile away, had engaged quarters at Field’s Hotel, being assigned to the boxed eaves of a second-story piazza in this pleasant caravanserai; but they had not yet deposited eggs on the 20th of June, 1906. Altho not formerly so fastidious—I have found cliff nests composed entirely of dried grass—these birds have become connoisseurs in upholstery of feathers, and their unglossed white eggs, five or six in number, are invariably smothered in purloined down, until we begin to suspect that our fowls rather than our features have favored our adoption. No. 133. BOHEMIAN WAXWING. A. O. U. No. 618. Bombycilla garrula (Linn.). Synonyms.—NortTHERN WAXWING. GREATER WAXWING, Description.—dults: A conspicuous crest; body plumage soft, grayish- brown or fawn-color, shading by insensible degrees between the several parts; back darker, passing into bright cinnamon-rufous on forehead and crown, and thru dark ash of rump and upper tail-coverts into black of tail; tips of tail feathers abruptly yellow (gamboge); breast with a vinaceous cast, passing into cinnamon-rufous of cheeks; a.narrow frontal line passing thru eye, and a short throat-patch velvety black; under tail-coverts deep cinnamon; wing blackish- ash, the tips of the primary coverts and the tips of the secondaries on outer webs, white, tips of primaries on outer webs bright yellow, whitening outwardly; the shafts of the rectrices produced into peculiar flattened red “sealing-wax” tips; bill and feet black. Length about 8.00 (203.2); wing 4.61 (117.1); tail 2.56 (65); bill .47 (11.9). Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; grayish-brown coloration. As dis- tinguished from the much more common Cedar-bird; belly not yellow; white wing-bars ; under tail-coverts cinnamon. Nesting.—Not known to breed in Washington. Like that of next species. Eggs, larger. Av. size, .98 x .69 (24.9 x 17.5). General Range.—Northern portions of northern hemisphere. In North America, south in winter irregularly to Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Kansas, southern Colorado, and northern California. Breeds north of United States; also, possibly, in the mountains of the West. Range in Washington.—Winter resident, regular and. sometimes abundant east of the Cascades, especially in the northern tier of counties; rare or casual on the West-side. Authorities.—Ampelis garrulus, Brewster, B. N. O. C. VII. Oct. 1882, p. 227, Dt. J. Ex Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. P'. C. ww =—*e oar oy SS SCARS 2 OP Qiks eee « THE BOHEMIAN WAXWING. 349 NOTHING can exceed the refined elegance of these “gentlemen in feath- ers’’ who visit us yearly in winter, rarely on Puget Sound, but abundantly in the northeastern portion of the State. Demure, gentle, courteous to a fault, and guileless to the danger point, and beyond, these lovely creatures exceed in beauty, if possible, their more familiar cousin, the Cedarbird. They move about in flocks, sometimes to the number of hundreds, and as the rigors of winter come on they search the orchard and berry-patch for ungarnered fruit, or divide with hungry Robins the largess of rowan trees. Much time is spent in amiable converse, but it is not at all fair to call them “chatterers,” or garrulus, as tho they were monkeys. Dignity is of the very essence of their being, and, as fond as they are of good living, they would starve rather than do anything rude or unseemly. An observer in Utah* relates how an ill-mannered Robin, jealous of the good behavior of a company of these visitors, in an apple tree, set about to abuse them. “He would bluster and scream out his denunciations till he seemed unable longer to restrain himself, when, to all appearances, absolutely beside himself with rage because the objects of his wrath paid no attention to his railings, he did the catapult act—hurling himself straight at the intruders. Several of the Waxwings, in order to avoid an actual collision, left the places where they were feeding, and alighting on twigs near by paused for a moment, as if to observe the antics of the furious Robin, when they would resume their feeding. Their indifference to the loud bullying protests of the Robin, and their persistence in remaining on the premises after he had ordered them off so exasperated Mr. Redbreast that with screams of defiance he dashed from group to group without stopping to alight, until, exhausted quite as much by the heat of anger as by the unusual exertions he was making, he was glad to drop to a branch and pant for breath’—while the Waxwings continued to ignore the churl, as gentlemen should. Concerning the nesting range of this bird there has been much surmise. For many years the single eggs taken by Kennicott at Fort Yukon on July 4, 1861, remained unique; but latterly we are learning that it also nests much further south. Mr. Brooks took four sets, one from a Murray pine and three from Douglas firs, at 158-Mile House, B. C., in June, rgo1». Dr. C. S. Moody® reports the taking of a set of five eggs at Sandpoint, Idaho, July 5, 1904. On June 26, 1904, Robert G. Bee, of Provo City, found a nest near Sunnyside, Utah*. With such examples before us it is, practically certain that the species will be found nesting in this State. Indeed, Mr. F. S. Mer- rill, of Spokane, believes that he once found a nest of the Bohemian Waxwing on the headwaters of the Little Spokane River near Milan. The nest he de- a. Rev. S. H. Goodwin in “The Condor,” Vol. VII., No. 4, p. too. b. The Auk, Vol. XX., July, 1903, p. 283. c. ‘Pacific Sportsman,” Vol. 2, June, 1905, p. 270. d. The Condor, Vol. VITI., July, August, 1905, p. 100. 359 THE CEDAR WAXWIGG. scribes as having been placed in an alder at a height of eight feet, and it con- tained four eggs on the point of hatching. The brooding bird allowed a close approach while upon the nest, but was not seen again after being once flushed. No. 134. CEDAR WAXWING. A. O. U. No. 619. Bombycilla cedrorum Vieill. Synonyms.—CepAr-BiRD. CHERRY-BIRD. CAROLINA WAXWING. LESSER WAXWING. Description.—Adults: A conspicuous crest; extreme forehead, lores, and line thru eye velvety-black; chin blackish, fading rapidly into the rich grayish- brown of remaining fore-parts and head; a narrow whitish line bordering the black on the forehead and the blackish of the chin; back darker, shading thru ash of rump to blackish-ash of tail; tail-feathers abruptly tipped with gamboge yellow ; belly sordid yellow ; under tail-coverts white; wings slaty-gray, primaries narrowly edged with whitish ; secondaries and inner quills without white mark- ings, but bearing tips of red “sealing-wax”; the tail-feathers are occasionally found with the same curious, horny appendages; bill black; feet plumbeous. Sexes alike, but considerable individual variation in number and size of waxen tips. Young, streaked everywhere with whitish, and usually without red tips. Length 6.50-7.50 (165.1-190.5) ; wing 3.70 (94); tail 2.31 (58.7); bill .g0 (10.2). Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size; soft grayish-brown plumage; crest; red sealing-wax tips on secondaries; belly yellow; wings without white bars or spots, as distinguished from preceding species. Nesting.—N est, a bulky affair of leaves, grasses, bark-strips and trash, well lined with rootlets and soft materials; placed in crotch or horizontally saddled on limb of orchard or evergreen tree. Eggs, 3-6, dull grayish blue or putty-color, marked sparingly with deep-set, rounded spots of umber or black. Av. size, 86x .61 (21.8x 15.5). Season: June, July; two broods. General Range.—North America at large, from the Fur Countries south- ward. In winter from the northern border of the United States south to the West Indies and Costa Rica. Breeds from Virginia, Kansas, Oregon, etc., northward. Range in Washington.—Of regular occurrence in the State, but irregular or variable locally. Resident, but less.common in winter. Authorities—1mpelis cedrorum Baird, Cooper and Suckley, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. XII, pt. I]. 1860, p. 187. 7 C&S. Rh. D'. Kb. Ra. D?. Ss?. Kk. B. E. Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. P. B. E. ONE does not care to commit himself in precise language upon the range of the Cedarbird, or to predict that it will be found at any given spot in a given season. The fact is, Cedarbirds are gypsies of the feathered kind. There are always some of them about somewhere, but their comings and goings are not according to any fixed law. A company of Cedarbirds may throng the oa a a ae THE CEDAR WAXWING. 351 rowan trees in your front yard some bleak day in December; they may nest in your orchard the following July; and you may not see them on your premises again for years—unless you keep cherry trees. It must be confessed (since the shade of the cherry tree is ever sacred to Truth) that the Cedarbird, or “Cherrybird,” has a single passion, a consuming desire for cherries. But don’t kill him for that. You like cherries yourself. All the more reason, then, why you should be charitable toward a brother’s weakness. Besides, he is so handsome,—handsomer himself than a luscious cherry even. Feast your eyes upon him, those marvelous melting browns, those shifting saffrons and Quaker drabs, those red sealing-wax tips on the wing-quills (he is canning cherries, you see, and comes provided). Feast your eyes, I say, and carry the vision to the table with you—and a few less cherries. Or, if there are not enough for you both, draw a decent breadth of mosquito-netting over the tree, and ab- solve your soul of murderous intent. Remember, too, if you require self- justification, that earlier in the season he diligently devoured noxious worms and insect pests, so that he has a clear right to a share in the fruit of his labors. Cherries are by no means the only kind of fruit eaten by these birds. Like most orchard-haunting species, they are very fond of mulberries, while the red berries of the mountain ash are a staple ration in fall and winter. Truth to tell, these beauties are sad gluttons, and they will gorge themselves at times till the very effort of swallowing becomes a delicious pain. The Cedarbird, being so singularly endowed with the gift of beauty, is denied the gift of song. He is, in fact, the most nearly voiceless of any of the American Oscines, his sole note being a high-pitched sibilant squeak. In- deed, so high-pitched is this extraordinary note that many people, and they trained bird-men, cannot hear them at all, even when the Waxwings are squeaking all about them. It is an almost uncanny spectacle, that of a company of Waxwings sitting aloft in some leafless tree early in spring, erect, immov- able, like soldiers on parade, but complaining to each other in that faint, pene- trating monotone. It is as tho you had come upon a company of the Immor- tals, high-removed, conversing of matters too recondite for human ken, and surveying you the while with Olympian disdain. You steal away from the foot of the tree with a chastened sense of having encountered something not quite understandable. The dilatory habits of these birds are well shown in their nesting, which they put off until late June or July, for no apparent reason. In constructing the nest the birds use anything soft and pliable which happens to catch the eye. Some specimens are composed entirely of the green hanging mosses, while others are a complicated mixture of twigs, leaves, rootlets, fibers, grasses, rags, string, paper, and what not. The nest may be placed at any moderate height up to fifty feet, and a great variety of trees are used altho orchard trees are favorites. The birds are half gregarious, even in the nest- 352 THE NORTHERN SHRIKE, | ing season, so that a small orchard may contain a dozen nests, while another as good, a little way removed, has none. In the Nooksack Valley, near Glacier, Mr. Brown showed me a tiny pasture carved out of the woods, where he had found, during the previous season, six nests of the Cedarbird, placed at heights ranging from three to six feet above the ground in small clumps of vine maple or alder saplings. In Chelan we found them nesting in the tops of the solitary pine trees which line the stream. The female sits closely upon her eggs, not infrequently remaining until forcibly removed. Once off, however, she makes away without complaint, and pays no further attention to the incident until the intruder has departed. Always of a most gentle disposition, when the nesting season arrives, according to Mr. Bowles, these birds richly deserve the name of Love Birds. A leaf from his note-book supports the statement: ‘July 7, 1896. To-day I watched two Cedarbirds selecting a nesting site, first one location being tested, then another. Finally they decided upon a suitable place and com- menced picking both dry and green leaves from the surrounding trees, placing them upon a horizontal limb where two or three twigs projected. Almost all of these leaves blew off as soon as placed, greatly to the surprise of the birds, who solemnly watched them drop to the ground. These fallen leaves were never replaced, fresh ones being gathered instead, and these were always secured from growing trees. Then one got a long strip of plant silk and, placing it on the leaf foundation flew a foot or two away and lit. The other bird promptly took away the silk and brought it to its mate, who very gently took it and put it back. This operation was repeated again and again. At times both held the silk, sitting only an inch or two apart, whereupon the bird who was the original finder would, very gently, pull it from the bill of its mate and replace it. At the end of fifteen minutes of this loving passage I was obliged to retire, and I shall never know whether the plant fiber was successfully placed or merely worn out.” No. 135. NORTHERN SHRIKE. A. O. U. No. 621. Lanius borealis Vieill. Synonyms.—Great NorTHERN SHRIKE. BUTCHER-BIRD. Description.—Adu/t; Upperparts clear, bluish gray, lightest—almost white— on upper tail-coverts ; extreme forehead whitish; wings and tail black, the former with a conspicuous white spot at base of primaries, the latter with large, white, terminal blotches on outer feathers, decreasing in size inwardly; a black band through eye, including auriculars; below grayish white, the feathers of the breast “oe ww &se we — —" ~~ | Pass: THE NORTHERN SHRIKE. 353 and sides narrowly tipped with dusky, producing a uniform, fine vermiculation which is always present; bill blackish, lightening at base of lower mandible; feet black. Young birds are barred or washed with grayish brown. ‘The plumage of adult is sometimes overcast above with a faint olivaceous tinge. Length 9.25- 10.75 (235-273.1) ; wing 4.50 (114.3); tail 4.19 (106.4) ; bill .72 (18.3); tarsus MOF) (27-3)) 5 Recognition Marks.—Robin size; gray and black coloring; sharply hooked bill; breast vermiculated with dusky, as distinguished from next species. Nesting.—Does not breed in Washington. Nest: a well constructed bowl of sticks, thorn-twigs, grasses, and trash, heavily lined with plant-down and feathers; in bushes or low trees. Eggs: 3-7, dull white or greenish gray, thickly dotted and spotted with olive-green, brown, or lavender. Av. size, 1.07 x .78 (27.2x 19.8). General Range.—Northern North America; south in winter to the middle and southern portions of the United States. Breeds north of the United States except sparingly in northern New England. Range in Washington.—Spring and fall migrant and not common winter resident thruout the State, chiefly at lower levels. Authorities.—? Townsend, Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. VIII. 1839, 152 (Columbia River).° Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, 325. C&S. Dt. Ra. D2 Bae. Specimens.—(U. of W.) P'. Prov. B. E. FLITTING like a gray ghost in the wake of the cheerful hosts of Juncoes and Redpolls, comes this butcher of the North in search of his accustomed prey. If it is his first visit south he posts himself upon the tip of a tree and rasps out an inquiry of the man with the gun. Those that survive these indiscretions are thereafter faintly descried in the distance, either in the act of diving from some anxious summit, or else winging swiftly over the inequalities of the ground. All times are killing time for this bloodthirsty fellow, and even in winter he “jerks” the meat not necessary for present consumption—be it chilly- footed mouse or palpitating Sparrow—upon some convenient thorn or splin- ter. In spring the north-bound bird is somewhat more amiable, being better fed, and he pauses from time to time during the advance to sing a strange medley, which at a little remove sounds like a big electric buzz. ‘This is meant for a love song, and is doubtless so accepted by the proper critics, but its rendition sometimes produces about the same effect upon a troop of Finches, which a cougar’s serenade does upon a cowering deer. Experts try to make out that this creature is beneficial, on the whole, because of the insects he devours, but I have seen too mitch good red blood on this butcher’s beak myself. My gun is loaded! Suckley writing in the Fifties remarks the scarcity of all Shrikes in Oregon or Washington “Territories,” and this is fortunately still true, espec- ially west of the Cascades. The probable explanation is that the mild climate of the Pacific slope of Alaska retards or prevents the southward movement of the more hardy species. 354 THE WHITE-RUMPED SHRIKE. No. 136. WHITE-RUMPED SHRIKE. A. O. U. No. 622 a. Lanius ludovicianus excubitorides (Swains.). Description.—Adult: Dark bluish gray above, changing abruptly to white on upper tail-coverts ; scapulars chiefly white; wings black, a small white spot at base of primaries; the inner quills narrowly tipped with white; tail black, the outer pair of feathers chiefly white, and the succeeding broadly tipped with white in descending ratio until color disappears in two central pairs; below white slightly soiled on breast, but everywhere strongly contrasting with upperparts; narrow frontal line including nasal tufts, lores, and ear-coverts, black,—continuous, and passing mostly below eye; bill and feet black. /mmature: Colors of adult less strongly contrasted ; lower parts washed with brownish; loral bar obscure; more or less vermiculated with dusky all over (in younger birds), or upon the under- parts alone; ends of wing-quills, coverts, and tail-feathers often with ochraceous or rusty markings. Length of adult male: 8.50-10,00 (215.9-254); wing 3.96 (100.6) ; tail 3.9 (99); bill .60 (15.3); tarsus 1.1 (28). Recognition Marks.—Chewink to Robin size; dark gray above; whitish be- low; longitudinal black patch of head; wings black and white; breast of adult un- marked, as distinguished from both L. borealis and L. 1. gambeli. Nesting.—Nest: a bulky but well-built structure of sticks, thorn-twigs, sage- bark, dried leaves, etc., heavily lined with wool, hair, and feathers; placed at moderate heights in sage-brush or sapling. Eggs: 5-7, dull grayish or greenish white, thickly speckled and spotted with pale olive or reddish brown. Av. size, .O7 X .73 (24.6x 18.5). Season: April, June; two broods. General Range.—\Vestern North America from the Great Plains westward, except Pacific Coast district and from Manitoba and the plains of Saskatchewan south over the tablelands of Mexico; south in winter over the whole of Mexico intergrading with L. /. migrans in region of the Great Lakes. Range in Washington—Common summer resident east of the Cascades, chiefly in sage-brush country. Authorities—Dawson, Auk, XIV. 1897, 179. (T). D'. D?. Sst. Ss?. Specimens.—(U. of W.) P. C. THE brushy draws of the low lava ranges and the open sage stretches of the East-side constitute the favorite preserve of this lesser bird of prey. He arrives from the South early in March when his patchy plumage harmonizes more or less with the snow-checkered landscape, but he is nowise concerned with problems of protective coloration. Seeking out some prominent perch, usually at this time of year a dead greasewood or a fence-post, he divides his time between spying upon the early-creeping field mouse and entertaining his lady love with outlandish music. Those who have not heard the White-rumped Shrike sing, have missed a treat. He begins with a series of rasping sounds, which are probably intended to produce the same receptive condition in his ' : , ’ s THE WHITE-RUMPED SHRIKE. 355 audience which Ole Bull secured by awkwardly breaking one string after an- other on his violin, till only one was left. There, however, the resemblance ceases, for where the virtuoso could extract a melody of marvelous variety and sweetness from his single string, the bird produces the sole note of a struck anvil. This pours forth in successive three-syllabled phrases like the metallic and reiterative clink of a freely falling hammer. The chief difference which Taken in Douglas County Photo by the Author. THE SHRIKE’S PRESERVE. appears between this love song and the ordinary call of warning or excitement is that in the latter case the less tender passions have weighted the clanging anvil with scrap iron and destroyed its resonance. The Shrike is a bird of prey but he is no restless prowler or hoverer, wear- ing out his wings with incessant flight—not he. Choosing rather a commanding position on a telegraph wire, or exposed bush top, he searches the ground with his eye until he detects some suspicious movement of insect, mouse, or bird Then he dives down amongst the sage, and if successful returns to his post to devour at leisure. The bird does not remain long enough at one station to in- spire a permanent dread in the local population of comestibles ; but rather moves on from post to post at short intervals and in methodical fashion. In flight the 356 THE WHITE-RUMPED SHRIKE. bird moves either by successive plunges and noisy reascensions, or else pitches downward from his perch and wings rapidly over the surface of the vegetation. The Sage Shrikes are prolific and attentive breeders. The first brood is brought off about the 1st of May, but fresh eggs may sometimes be found as early as the last week in March in the southern part of the State. ]; Ba EB, Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. B. BN. E. THE old-fashioned name “Greenlet,”’ as applied to the Vireos, was a mis- nomer, if a description of plumage was intended; but if it was intended to memorialize the bird’s fondness for greenery, nothing could have been more apt. The Warbling Vireo’s surroundings must be not only green, but freshly green, for it frequents only deciduous trees in groves and riverside copses. It is not an abundant bird, therefore, in Washington, altho equally distributed, whether in the willows and birches which gather about some lonesonre spring in the bunch-grass country, or among the crowded alders and maples of the turbid Nooksachk. Moreover, the bird is not so frequently found about parks and shade trees as in the East, altho it looks with strong favor upon the advent of orchards. And the orchardist may welcome him with open arms, for there is not among all his tenants a more indefatigable gleaner of bugs and worms. Because he is clad in Quaker gray there is little need for the Vireo to show himself as he sings, and he remains for the most part concealed in the dense foliage, a vocal embodiment of the living green. Unlike the disconnected fragments which the Red-eye furnishes, the song of this bird is gushing and continuous, a rapid excursion over pleasant hills and valleys. Continuous, that is, unless the bright-eyed singer happens to spy a worm in medias res, in which event the song is instantly suspended, to be resumed a moment later when the wriggling tid-bit has been dispatched. The notes are flute-like, tender, and melodious, having, as Chapman says, “a singular alto under- tone.” All hours of the day are recognized as ap- propriate to melody, and the song period lasts from the time of the bird’s arrival, early in May, until its departure in Sep- tember, with only a brief hiatus in July. In sharp contrast with the beautiful canzonettes which the bird showers down from the treetops, come the harsh, wren-like WESTERN WARBLING VIREO AT NES1 362 THE CASSIN VIREOR scolding notes, which it often delivers when searching thru the bushes, and especially if it comes across a lurking cat. The Warbling Vireo’s cradle is swung midway from the fork of some nearly horizontal branch in the depths of a shady tree. In height it may vary from fifteen to twenty-five feet above the ground; but I once found one in a peach tree without a shadow of protection, and within reach from the ground. The structure is a dainty basket of interwoven grasses, mosses, flower-stems, and the like. It is not, however, so durable as that of some other Vireos, since much of its thickness is due to an ornamental thatching of grass, bark-strips, green usnea moss, and cottonwood down, which dis- solves before winter is over. The female is a close sitter, sticking to her post even tho nearly paralyzed with fear. The male is usually in close attendance, and knows no way of discouraging the inquisitive bird-man save by singing with redoubled energy. He takes his turn at the eggs when his wife needs a bit of an airing, and even, it is said, carries his song with him to the nest. No. 140. CASSIN’S VIREO. A. O. U. No. 629a. Lanivireo solitarius cassinii (Xantus). Synonym.—\WeESTERN SOLITARY VIREO. Description.—Adult male: Crown and sides of head and neck deep olive- gray; a supraloral stripe and eye-ring whitish, the latter interrupted by dusky of lore; remaining upperparts olive-green overcast with gray, clearing, pure olive- green on rump and upper tail-coverts; wings and tail blackish with edging of light olive-green or yellowish (white on outer web of outer rectrices); tips of middle and greater coverts yellowish olive, forming two rather conspicuous bars ; underparts white tinged with buffy, changing on sides and flanks to sulphur yellow or pale olive; under tail-coverts yellowish; bill grayish black above, paler below; feet dusky, iris brown. Adult female: Like male but duller, browner on head and neck, less purely white below. /mmature: Head and neck more nearly like back; supraloral streak, orbital ring, and underparts washed with brownish buff. Length about 5.50 (139.7); wing 2.84 (72.2); tail 2.05 (52.2); bill .39 (10); tarsus .75 (19). Recognition Marks.—Warbler size; slaty gray head contrasting with oliva- ceous back; whitish eye-ring distinctive; voice has more of an edge than that of V’. olivacea. Nesting.—Nest; a semi-pensile basket of woven bark-strips, grasses, and vegetable fibers, variously ornamented externally with cherry petals, spider cases, bits of paper, etc., lashed to bark of horizontal or descending bough of sapling ; i) * > ’ ‘ ' ; ¥ THE CASSIN VIREO. 303 (oak, vine-maple, fir, etc.) at a height of from five to thirty feet; bulkier and of looser construction than that of other Vireos; measures 2'4 inches across by 1% inches deep inside; walls often 34 of an inch in thickness. Eggs: 3-5, usually 4, white or creamy white, sparingly marked with spots, which vary from rich red brown to almost black—but unmarked specimens are of record. Av. size .75X.55 (19x 13.9). Season: May 15-June 5; one brood. General Range.—Pacific Coast district north to British Columbia, east to Idaho (Ft. Sherman; Ft. Lapwai), breeding from Los Angeles County, Cali- fornia, northward thruout its range; south in winter to western Mexico. Range in Washington.—Common summer resident on both sides of the Cascades, found chiefly in timbered areas. Migrations.—S pring: Seattle-Tacoma, c. April 15. Authorities.—? Vireo solitarius, Ornithological Committee, Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila., VII. 1837, 193 (Columbia River). JV. solitarius Vieillot, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv., IX. pt. Il 1858, p. 340, part. (T). C&S. Rh. D'. Ra. D?. Ss?. [fade dae Specimens.—(U. of W.) B. Prov. P'. NOTHING so endears a bird to a human admirer as a frank ex- hibition of confidence. Overtures of friendship on the bird’s part may traverse all rules of caution and previous procedure, but henceforth there is a new relation established between them, bird and man, and the man, at least, is bound to live up to it. At the oncoming of a smart shower on Capitol Hill (before the “For Sale” days) the bird-man put into a fir-covered nook for shel- ter, and had not been there two minutes before a pair of Cassin Vireos entered for the same reason. ‘They were not in the least disturbed by the man’s presence, but cheer- fully accepted him as part of Things as They Are. There- fore, they proceeded to preen their dampened feathers at distances of four or five feet, while the bird-man sat with bated breath and glowing eyes. The birds roamed freely about the nook and once, I think, We made a_ grimace behind the bird-man’s back; for when they came around in front again, [ judged she was saying, “Ar’n’t you the wag!” while he tittered in droll recollection. Taken in Oregon. Photo by Finley and Bolkiman. CASSIN VIREO AT NEST. Chese Vireos roam the halt open W mods at all levels, like happy school children; and their childish curiosity is as little to be resented If one hears a bird singing in the distance, he need only sit down and wait Curiosity will get the better of the bird, and under pretense of chasing bugs it will edge over, singing carelessly now and then, by way of covering the inquisitive intent \t close range the song is stifled, and you feel for the ensuing moments as you do when you have overtaken and passed a bevy of ladies on a lonesome street, a// hands and feet with most atrocious sWaPeel [nspec- tol done, the b > ddenly re St es he dis carded melody el lif ) no lor £7 ¢ ive to pPiCadsall Like st Vi re Cassin sings is he works; and, is he irks l BVOC leal of the I { he in leisure fashion he ~ <5 1 til p ises, separated b I ba ssed ‘ SI A 5 I mre life { ple isa } { t : / / tot lawson and Bowles p BRIMFUI pit B { schoolbo does no full ‘ ress himself deli { He S ( nand S g f e-grating }) ) 1h { b N ( l cmete S¢ g is S b S¢ whe he h 1 larl Fine ' a F ote ( he fitlhy likened P le Re o f enne THE CASSIN VIREO: 365 box, a rattling, rubbing, shaking note, of three or more vibrations, ending in a little vocal flourish. These Vireos swing a bulky basket from the lower or middle heights of oak trees, fir trees, alders, or saplings of various sorts. Usually no dependence is placed in cover, save that the ornamented nest corresponds roughly with its general surroundings of leaf, moss and lichen. In shel- tered places, the texture of the nest is so well preserved that it may require close inspection the second season to distinguish it from a new nest. One such I examined, green with growing moss, and stark at the —— lowermost branch-tip of an unleafed cornel sapling, and I could not have determined \ \| Abia = its age save for a tiny weed- shoot germinating from _ the bottom of the cup. Further Mr. Bowles says of their nesting habits: “Both birds assist in the duties of incubation, the male singing most assidu- ously while on the nest, and usually sing- ing close to his mate while she is sitting. His turn at _ sitting seems to come be- Taken near Tacoma. Photo by Bowles and Dawson tween nine o’clock in A DECORATED NEST. the morning and noon, and the nest is not hard to find if his song can be traced. The bird student must work quietly, however, as the song at once ceases should any unusual noise occur. They are most courageous while on the nest, seldom leaving until removed by hand, when both birds remain within a few feet of the intruder, scolding vigorously. So much noise do they make that all the birds in the vicinity are attracted—indeed this is about the only sure method of ascertaining the presence of some of our rarer Warblers On one such occasion a female Cooper Hawk left her nest, which was seventy-five yards distant, and sat on a branch overhead, screaming at me. “They are the quickest as well as the slowest birds in com pleting their nests that have come under my notice. One pair built a 366 THE ANTHONY VIREO, handsome nest and laid four eggs in precisely ten days; while another pair were more than three weeks from the time the nest was started until the eggs were laid “They are the only Vireos that | have ever known to nest in communities Single pairs are as many as SIx occupied nests inside of a very small area, the nests being only a face ne - not O'ER YOUNG TO FLI1 few yards apart No. 141. ANTHONY’S VIREO. \. O. U. No. 632c¢. Vireo huttoni obscurus Anthony Synonym.—Dusky VIREO Description. ldults: Above dull olive, brightening (more greenish) poster rly; wings and tail dusky lged chiefly with pale olive-green; two prominent g-bars of pale ve-ye or whitish, formed by tips of middle and greatet verts: tertials broadly edged with palest olive on outer, and with whitish on webs; outer web of outermost rectrix whitish; underparts sordid whitish ind more or less washed, chiefly on breast and sides, with dingy olive-yellow ; pale; an orbital ring of whitish, or palest olive-yellow, interrupted midway ‘ by spot of dusky; bill horn-color above, pale below Length about 1.75 (120. iverage of three specimens in Provincial Museum at Victoria: wing 1( $9.9 tail 2.20 (55.8); bill .35 (8.9); tarsus .75 (19) THE ANTHONY VIREO. 367 Recognition Marks.—Pygmy to warbler size; dingy coloration; whitish wing-bars serve to distinguish bird from Vireosylva g. swainsonii, but throw it into confusion in summer with the Western Flycatcher (Empidonar difficilis), which it otherwise closely resembles, and in winter with the Sitkan Kinglet (Regulus c. grinnelli). From the Flycatcher it may be distinguished by its shorter, narrower and yet thicker bill, and by its more restrained yellowness; from the Kinglet by its greater size and much stouter bill, more prominent wing-bars, and rather less prominent eye-ring; and from both by its demure ways. Nesting.— Vest; a semipensile basket of interwoven mosses lined with grasses (nine feet high in fir tree—one example known). Eggs: 2-5(?); .72x.52 (18x 12.9). Season: June (probably also earlier). General Range.—Pacific Coast district from western Oregon to south- western British Columbia at lower levels (not at all confined to oak woods as variously reported). Range in Washington.—\Vest-side, as above; strictly resident. Authorities.—? Townsend, Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. VIII. 1839, 153 (Columbia River). Bowles (C. W. and J. H.), Auk, XV. 1898, 138. Ra. B. E. Specimens.—U. of W. Prov. B. E. IN approaching the study of Anthony’s Vireo one must forget all he knows or thinks he knows about Vireos in general. This bird is sui generis, and deviations from all known rules are its delight. It has been, in fact, until quite recently, a sort of woodland sphinx, an ornithological mystery, the sub- ject of much inquiry and hazard. Its presence in Washington was quite over- looked by Cooper and Suckley, and Mr. Rathbun’s appears to be the record* of first occurrence, that of a bird taken May 14, 1895. I took a specimen on Capitol Hill on the third day of June of the same year; and since that time appearances have become a matter of course to the initiated. Samuel N. Rhoads, writing in 1893, considered Anthony’s Vireo a rare visitor to Van- couver Island, where he secured a specimen in 1892 near Victoria. Fannin‘ records it as “a summer resident on Vancouver Island.’’ As matter of fact, the bird is resident the year round wherever it occurs. I saw it near Victoria during the coldest weather of 1905-6, and find it regularly at Seattle and Ta- coma during the winter season. J. H. Bowles secured a specimen, a male in full song, at American Lake on January the 26th, 1907. Moreover, this bird had a bare belly as tho it might have been assisting with incubation. The very fact that these birds winter with us argues that they have been here for always and always, and the darkening of plumage (as compared with the type form, I’. huttoni) testifies further to their long residence. Anthony’s Vireo is leisurely, almost sluggish at times, in its movements. a. Auk, Vol. XIX., Apr., 1902, p. 138. b. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1893, p. 54- c. Cat. B. C. Birds Prov. Mus., Victoria, 1904, p. 52. 368 THE ANTHONY VIRBO. — During the winter it mingles freely with the local troops of Kinglets and Chickadees, and keeps largely to the depths of fir trees. When moving about silently, it bears a striking resemblance to the Ruby-crowned Kinglet. It is, of course, slightly larger and much more deliberate, lacking especially the wing-flirt of the Kaiserkin. The region about the eye is more broadly whitish, and the wing-bars concede a difference upon inspection, but the resemblance is so close as altogether to deceive the unwary. In spring the bird separates itself from its late companions, and begins to explore the budding alders and maples. As the season advances the bird plants itself in some thicket and complains by the hour in strange, monotonous, unvi- reonine notes. The songs vary endlessly in different individuals, but have this in common, that they are a deliberate, unvarying succession of double notes, usually, but not always, of a slightly nasal character. Chu-zéem - - - - chu- wéem - - ---- chu-wéem --ad lib., is the common type; Pu-cheéan - - --- pu-cheéan - - - - - - pucheéan, is a French variation; Poo-eép' - - - poo-eép' and jiireé - jiireé - jiireé! are types lacking the nasal quality. Only once I heard the notes pronounced quite rapidly, pe-eg’, pe-eg’, pe-eg’, pe-eg' pe-eg', ad infinitum, or rather ad adventwmn shotguni. Occasionally the first syllable is accented ; as, (pe)cheé-oo or cheé-oov, cheé-oo. Before he has found a mate Anthony roams about with some degree of restlessness, shifting his burden of song from place to place with a view to effect, and uttering now and then coaxing little requests which are certainly meant to win the heart of the lady in hiding. This squeaking note is sometimes raised to the dignity of song, at which times it is not unlike the whining of a dog, a most extraordinary sound to come from so tiny a throat. And if one mentions a chirp, or chuck, like that of a Red-wing Blackbird on a small scale, we have most of the representative efforts of this eccentric genius. Only one nest of this subspecies has been reported to date, that discovered by Mr. C. W. Bowles, on June 21, 1897, near South Tacoma. It was placed nine feet up in a young fir, where it hung suspended by two small twigs. Externally it was composed entirely of a long hanging moss, some variety of U'snea, very thickly and closely interwoven, being thus conspicuously devoid of such exterior decorations as other Vireos provide. Inside was a carefully prepared bed of fine dry grasses, upon which lay two eggs half incubated. “The female bird was on the nest when first seen and, unlike the majority of our Vireos, flushed the instant the ascent of the tree was attempted. From the nest she flew about twenty feet into a neighboring fir, where she looked down upon our operations with apparently no concern whatever. Beyond rearranging her feathers from time to time, there was nothing to indicate that she had a nest anywhere in the vicinity, as she made no sound or com- plaint of any kind. Neither was there any of the nervous hopping from THE KINGBIRD. 369 twig to twig in the manner by which so many of the smaller birds as clearly display their anxiety as they do by their notes of distress.’’ No. 142. KINGBIRD. A. O. U. No. 444. Tyrannus tyrannus (Linn.). Synonyms.—Eastern Kincpirp. Bree Martin. Tyrant FLYcAtTcHer. Description.—Adult: Above ashy black changing to pure black on head, and fuscous on wings; crown with a concealed orange-red (cadmium orange) patch or “crest,” the orange feathers black-tipped and overlying others broadly white at base; wings with whitish and brownish ash edgings; tail black, all the feathers broadly white-tipped, and the outermost pair often white-edged ; below white, washed with grayish on breast; bill and feet black. Jimmature birds lack the crown-patch, and are more or less tinged with fulvous or buffy on the parts which are light-colored in the adult. Length 8.00-9.00 (203-228.6); wing 4.60 (116.8) ; tail 3.31 (84.1) ; bill from nostril .52 (13.2). Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; blackish ash above; white below ; black tail conspicuously tipped with white; noisy and quarrelsome. Nesting.—WNest: at moderate heights in trees, usually over water, of weed- stalks, plant-fibres and trash, with a felted mat of plant-down or wool, and an inner lining of fine grasses, feathers, rootlets, etc. Eggs: 3 or 4, sometimes 5, white or cream-white, distinctly but sparingly spotted with dark umber and oceasional chestnut. Av. size .98x.73 (24.9x 18.5). Season: first week in June; one brood. General Range.—North America from the British Provinces south; in win- ter thru eastern Mexico, Central and South America. Less common west of the Rocky Mountains. Not recorded from northern Mexico and Arizona. Range in Washington.—Not uncommon summer resident on East-side; not common, but of regular occurrence in certain localities west of the Cascades; nearly confined to vicinity of water in lake or pond. Authorities.—7 yrannus carolinensis Baird, Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv., DPXeupty UemiSsopa m7 Da Cero sD xe aD 20.55% Os2n)-) BS Ba Specimens.—(U. of W.) Prov. P'. C. E. NO one has come forward with a theory to account for the testiness of this bird’s temper, nor for the domineering qualities which distinguish him above all others; but I hazard that it is because his glowing crown is partially concealed by bourgeois black. Those whose regal marks are more patent are wont to receive homage as matter of course, but the scion of an unacknowl- a. C. W. and J. H. Bowles in The Auk, Vol. XV., Apr., 1808, p. 1309. 370 THE KINGBIRD. © edged house, a feathered Don Carlos, must needs spend a fretful life in de- fense of his claims Toward those who knuckle down tamely the little tyrant is often very gracious, and it may be conceded that he does perform a real service in holding the common enemies at bay. Who has not seen him as he quits his perch on some commanding tree and hurries forward, choking with vengeful utterance, to meet and chastise some murderous hawk, who before any other foe is brave? Down comes the avenger! The Hawk shies with a guttural cry of rage and terror, while a little puff of feathers scatters on the air to tell of the tyrant’s success. Again and again the quick punishment falls. until the tiny scourge desists, and returns, shaking with shrill laughter, to give his mate an account of his adventure. It is easily possible, how- ever, to exag- gerate the pug- nacity of the Kingbird, or to infer from ex- treme examples that all are quarrelsome. It is not unusual for Kingbirds to be on the best of terms with their im- mediate neigh- by F. S. Merrill. Taken near Spokane. bors, thieves al- ways excepted. I once found in \ DEMURE YOUNG TYRANT. \ one small aspen tree at Chelan the nests of three birds each containing eggs, viz., a Robin, an Oriole, and a Kingbird. The two latter were within five feet of each other. Dr. Brewer also records an exactly similar case. King- bird’s courage, which is unquestionable, is often tempered by prudence; altho at other times it quite overbalances his better judgment. The Bur- rowing Owl will tolerate none of his nonsense, and I have seen the birds make sad mistakes in molesting these virtuous mousers. The sight of a Shrike will make a Kingbird shrink into the smallest possible compass, while Catbirds, too, are said to be, for valid reasons, quite exempt from molestation THE KINGBIRD. 371 The food of the Kingbird consists entirely of insects, caught on the wing for the most part, by sallies from some favorite perch. His eyesight must be very good, as he not infrequently spies his prey at distances of from twenty to fifty yards. Honey bees form an occasional but inconsiderable article of diet. Grasshoppers are not overlooked, and they sometimes capture, not with- out a scuffle, those big brown locusts (Melanoplius sp.) which make flippant exposure of their persons on a summer day. Both in the taking of food and in the discharge of police duties the Kingbird exhibits great strength and swiftness, as well as grace in flight. Once, when passing in a canoe thru a quiet, weed-bound channel, I was quite deceived for a time by the sight of distant white-breasted birds dashing down to take insects near the surface of the water, and even, occasionally dipping under it. They had all the ease and grace of Tree Swallows, but proved to be Kingbirds practising in a new role. This fondness for water is often exhibited in the birds’ choice of a nesting site. Where accustomed to civilization, orchard or shade trees are preferred, but on many occasions nests are found on low-swinging horizontal branches over- hanging the water; and, as often, in tiny willow clumps or isolated trees entire- ly surrounded by it. The nest of the Kingbird sometimes presents that studied disarray which is considered the height of art. Now and then a nest has such a disheveled ap- pearance as to quite discour- age investiga- tion, unless the owners’ presence be- trays the se- cret of occu- pancy. On the shore of Cold Spring Lake, in Douglas County, we noted a last year’s Bullock Oriole’s nest, which would not have at- tracted a sec- (a giance, ,., , nd gl An1Cce Taken in Douglas County. Photo by W. L. Dawson with the new- er nest hard COLD SPRING LAKE. THE ORIOLE-KINGBIRD NEST APPEARS NEAR THE TOP OF TIITE PROJECTING TREE aya THE WESTERN KINGBIRD. by, had it not been for the constant solicitude of a pair of Kingbirds. Investiga- tion showed that the ancient pocket had been crammed full of grass and twigs, and that it contained two fresh eggs of the Flycatcher. Ordinarily the nest is placed in an upright or horizontal fork of a tree at a height of from three to forty feet. Twigs, weed-stalks, and trash of any kind enter into the basal con- struction. The characteristic feature of the nest, however, is the mould, or matrix, composed of vegetable plaster, ground wood, and the like, or else of compacted wool and cow-hair, which is forced into the interstices of the outer structure and rounded inside, giving shape to the whole. This cup, in turn, is lined with fine grasses, cow-hair, or variously. Occasionally, nests are found composed almost entirely of wool. In others string is the principal ingredient. Altho the Kingbird never sings, it has a characteristic and not unmusical , tisic, tisic (spell it phthisic, if you favor the old school) or tsee tsee tsee rd , in numerous combinations of ‘syllables, which are capable of expressing various degrees of excitement and emotion. In eastern Washington this Kingbird is common and well distributed, tho far less abundant than the larger, grayer ““Western.’’ West of the Cascades it is rare but regular, being found chiefly along the wooded margins of lakes. No. 143. WESTERN KINGBIRD. A. O. U. No. 447. Tyrannus verticalis Say. Synonyms.—ARKANSAS KinGprrp. ARKANSAS FLYCATCHER. Description.—.du/t Male: Foreparts, well down on breast, and upper back ashy gray, lightening, nearly white, on chin and upper throat, darker on lores and behind eye; a partially concealed crown-patch of orange-red (Chinese orange) ; lateral boundaries of this patch olivaceous; back, scapulars, and rump ashy glossed with olive-green; this color shading to black on upper tail-coverts; wings fuscous; tail black, the outer web of outermost rectrix white, or faintly tinged with yellow; underparts below breast rich canary yellow, paler on wing-linings and lower tail-coverts; bill and feet black; iris brown. Adult Female: like male but crown-patch usually somewhat restricted, and primaries much less attenuated. Young birds are duller and browner without crown-patch, and with little or no olivaceous on back; the yellow of underparts is paler (sulphury or even whitish), and the primaries are scarcely or not at all attenuated. Length of adult males about 9.00 (228.6); wing 5.12 (130); tail 3.68 (93.5); bill .73 (18.7); tarsus 74 (18.8). Females average less. Recognition Marks.—Chewink to Robin size; noisy, petulant ways; ashy foreparts and yellow belly distinctive. Nesting.—Nest: of twigs, grasses, string, wool, and other soft substances, placed at moderate heights in bushes or trees, or more commonly on beams and THE WESTERN KINGBIRD. 0 ly fe } 9 ledges of barn or outbuildings. Eggs. 3-5, like those of 7. tyrannus, but averag- ing smaller, .93 x .68 (23.6x 17.3). Season: first week in June; one brood. General Range.—\Vestern United States, north regularly to southern British Columbia, occasionally to Alberta, Assiniboia, and Manitoba, north to western Minnesota, eastern Nebraska, and western Texas, breeding thruout range, and south to Chihuahua, Mexico; south in winter thru Mexico to highlands of Guatemala. Range in Washington.—Common summer resident east of the Cascades, rare or casual on the West-side. Migrations.—S pring: c May ist; Wallwa April 26, 1905; Yakima April 30, 1900; Chelan May 11, 1896. Authorities.—Baird, Rep. Pac. R. R. Surv. IX. 1858, p. 174. T. C&S. D'. IDES Sas Seay Jo 1h 18, Specimens.—U. of W. P'. Prov. B. E. HERE is the presiding genius of all properly conducted ranches upon the sunny side of the Cascade Mountains. Guest he is not, host rather; and be- fore you have had time to dismount from your panting cayuse this bird bustles forth from the locust trees and hovers over you with noisy effusive- Taken in Douglas County WESTERN KINGBIRD AT NES1 Photo by the Author. 374 THE WESTERN KINGBIRD. ness. The boisterous greeting is one-third concern for his babies in the locust tree hard-by, one-third good fellowship, and the remainder sheer restlessness The Western Kingbird is preeminently a social creature. And by social in this case we mean, of course, inclined to human society. For, altho the bird may start up with vociferating cries every time a member of the be sieged household sets foot out of doors one is reminded by these attentions rath er of a_ frolicsome puppy than of a zeal- ous guardian of t peace Those who have been most hon- ored by their pres ence year after year claim that the bird become fond of cer- tain members of the family, and allow a familiarity in nest inspection which would be shriekingly resented in the case of strangers. One can readily guess a utilitarian consideration in fa vor of ranch life. riety and abundance of insects afforded " P t S TH 1 - n r ire MK rT es mo } it t l ng Mi { { t , j | cher! D g » that shot-gun at \ 1 ; THE WESTERN KINGBIRD. 375 and dissected over a hundred specimens of Western Kingbirds and Phceebes, using a microscope in the examination of stomach contents. The birds had been shot about the apiaries, where they had been seen darting upon and catching bees. Altho many of the birds were gorged, no working bees were found, only drones. This is an important distinction to bear in mind, for the reduction of drones is unqualifiedly beneficial. And when one stops to think of it, it is absurd to suppose that a bird could swallow bees, stings and all, with impunity. But the real secret of Kingbird’s attachment for mankind is not dis- covered until we see his nest. It is our strings which have won his heart. Whatever else the nest may or may not contain, it is sure to have string,— string in strands, string in coils, string in bunches, hanks, and tangles, drug store string of a dissipated crimson hue, white string that came around the sugar, greasy string that you had tied around your finger to remind you to feed the chickens, string of every length and size and use and hue. Those Western Kingbirds which have not yet adopted men manage to subsist somewhat after the fashion of their eastern cousins, and build a nest of twigs, grass, weed-stalks, bark strips, and cottonwood down, placing it against the trunk, or saddling it upon a horizontal fork of willow, poplar, cottonwood, or pine, usually near water. One we found in Douglas County built in a small willow which emerged from a shallow lake, a hundred feet from shore. But, more commonly, nests are placed about crannies and projections of farm buildings, fences, unused wagon-ricks, or upon the house itself. If no such conveni- ences offer, a shade tree is second choice, and the nest includes all the soft waste which the farm affords, bits of cloth, wool, cow- hair, feathers, and string. Eggs to the number of 4 or 5 are depos- ited from the Ist to the Taken at Stratford. Photo by the Author. 15th of June. A DIVIDED HOUSE. 376 THE ASH-THROATED FLYCATCHER. Beauties they are too, creamy white with bold and handsome spots of chestnut in two shades, and lilac-gray. Incubation is accomplished in twelve or thirteen days, and the youngsters fly in a matter of two weeks. These Kingbirds are model parents, devoted in brooding and courageous in defense. Noisy they are to a fault, gurrulous in an unnumbered host of cajolatives and ecstatics, as well as expletives. Unlike the members of Tyrannus tyrannus, they are good neighbors even among their own kind. At the call of need neighbors rally to the common defense, but this is usually in villages where demesnes adjoin. On several occasions I have found other birds nesting peaceably in the same tree with these Kingbirds; and, as in the case of 7. tyrannus, Bullock Orioles appear to be rather particular friends. The nests shown in the cut on preceding page are the work of one pair of birds. Embarrassed by a wealth of string and unable to decide which of two good locations to utilize, the birds built in both; the female laid eggs in both, three in one and two in the other. Moreover, she sat in both, day and day about, a bird of a divided mind. No. 144. ASH-THROATED FLYCATCHER. A. O. U. No. 454. Myiarchus cinerascens (Lawrence). Description.—Adults: Above dull grayish brown changing to clear brown on crown; wings dusky brown, the middle and greater coverts tipped broadly, and the secondaries edged with pale buffy brown or dull whitish, the primaries edged, except toward tips, with cinnamon-rufous; tail darker than back, with paler grayish brown edgings, that of outermost rectrix sometimes nearly white; tail feathers, except central pair, chiefly cinnamon-rufous on inner webs; sides of head and neck gray (slightly tinged with brown) fading into much paler gray on chin, throat, and chest, changing to pale yellowish on breast and remaining underparts ; yellow of underparts strengthening posteriorly, and axillars and under wing- coverts clear (primrose) yellow. . Bill blackish; feet and legs black; iris brown. Length of adult male about 8.35 (212); wing 3.94 (100) ; tail 3.63 (92); bill .75 (19); tarsus .o1 (23). Recognition Marks.—Chewink size; brownish gray above; ashy throat shading into pale yellow of remaining underparts. Nesting.—Nest: a natural cavity or deserted Flicker hole, copiously lined with wool, hair, or other soft materials. Eggs: 3-6, usually 4, buffy or creamy as to ground, but heavily marked, chiefly in curious lengthwise pattern, with streaks of purplish chestnut of several degrees of intensity. Av. size, 88x .65 (22.4 x 16.5). Season: first week in June; one brood. THE ASH-THROATED FLYCATCHER. 377 General Range.—Western United States and northern Mexico, north ir- regularly to Washington; south in winter thru Mexico to Guatemala. Range in Washington.—Breeding near North Yakima in summer of 1903; one other record, Tacoma May 24, 1905. Authorities.—Snodgrass (R. E.), Auk. Vol. XXI, Apr. 1904, p. 229. B. Specimens.—P. C. FLYCATCHERS are somewhat given to wandering, or at least exploring, on their own account, regardless of traditions. A Gray Kingbird (Tyrannus dominicensis), normally confined to the Gulf of Mexico, is of record for Cape Beale on Vancouver Island; and that dashing gallant, the Scissor-tailed Fly- catcher, of Texas, has ventured as far north as Hudson Bay. The Ash- throated Flycatcher is typically a bird of the south-western United States; but it is not altogether surprising that it should have extended its northern range into the Upper Sonoran belt of eastern Washington, as it did in the season of 1903, when it was observed at North Yakima by Mr. Bowles, and, independently, by Mr. Robert E. Snodgrass, the latter collecting for Pullman College. Without precedent or excuse, however, was the appearance of a handsome pair near Tacoma, as recorded by Mr. Bowles, on the 24th day of May, 1905. “The Ash-throated Flycatcher is quite expert upon the wing but never indulges in protracted flight if it can help it. It seems to be rather quarrel- some and intolerant in its disposition toward other birds, and will not allow any to nest in close proximity; in fact, I am inclined to believe that it not in- frequently dispossesses some of the smaller Woodpeckers of their nesting sites. “Its food consists mainly of beetles, butterflies, grasshoppers, flies, moths, and occasionally of berries, especially those of a species of mistletoe. “By the beginning of May most of the birds are mated, and _nidification begins shortly afterward. The nests are usually placed in knot-holes of mesquite, ash, oak, sycamore, juniper, and cottonwood trees, as well as in cavities of old stumps, in Woodpeckers’ holes, and occasionally behind loose pieces of bark, in the manner of the Creepers. “The Ash-throated Flycatcher nests at various heights from the ground, rarely, however, at greater distances than twenty feet. The nest varies con- siderably in bulk according to the size of the cavity used. »Where this is large the bottom is filled up with small weed-stems, rootlets, grass, and bits of dry cow- or horse-manure, and on this foundation the nest proper is built. This consists principally of a felted mass of hair and fur from different animals, and occasionally of exuvize of snakes and small lizards; but these materials are not nearly as generally used as in the nests of our eastern Crested Flycatcher— it fact, it is the exception and not the rule to find such remains in their nests” ( Bendire). oe ion ce : No. 145. SAY’S PEWEE. A. O. U. No. 457. Sayornis saya (Bonap.). Synonyms.—Say’'s PHorse. WeEsTERN PHOEBE. Description.—ldults: General color drab (grayish brown to dark hair- brown), darker on pileum and auriculars, lighter on throat, shading thru upper tail-coverts to black; tail brownish black; wings fuscous, the coverts and exposed webs of tertials edged with lighter grayish brown; underparts below breast cinnamon-buff ; axillars and lining of wings light buff or cream-buff. Bill and feet black; iris brown. Young birds are more extensively fulvous, and are marked by two cinnamomeous bands on wings (formed by tips of middle and greater coverts). Length of adult male 7.50 (190.5); wing 4.14 (105); tail 3.23 (82); bill .62 (15.7); tarsus .79 (20). Female averages smaller. Recognition Marks.—Sparrow size; drab coloring ; cinnamon-colored belly ; melancholy notes; frequents barns and outbuildings or cliffs. Nesting.—Nest: composed of dried grasses, moss, plant-fibers, woolly ma- terials of all sorts, and hair; placed on ledges, under eaves of outbuildings, under bridges, or on cliffs. Eggs: 3-6, usually 5, dull white, occasionally sparsely dotted. Av. size, .77 x .59 (19.6x 15). Season; April 20-May 10, June 1-15; two broods. Yakima County April 24, 1900, 5 young about five days old (eggs fresh about April 7th). General Range.—Western North America north to the Arctic Circle in Alaska, Yukon Territory, etc., east to Manitoba, western Wyoming, western Kansas, ete., breeding thruout range, south to Arizona and northern Lower California; southward in winter over northern and central Mexico. Range in Washington.—Common summer resident east of the Cascades (chiefly in Upper Sonoran and Arid Transition life-zones), rare or casual west of the mountains. Migrations.—Spring: c March 15; Okanogan County March 17, 1896; Ahtanum (Yakima Co.) Feb. 20, 1900. Authorities.—Bendire, Life Hist. N. A. Birds, Vol. II. 1895, p. 277. (T). Dib: D4 ost) Sst ieck Specimens.—!"'. Prov. C. A GENTLE melancholy possesses the Pewee. The memory of that older Eden once blotted by the ruthless ice-sheet, still haunts the chambers of the atavistic soul and she goes mourning all her days. Or she is like a Peri barred from Paradise, and no proffer of mortal joys can make amends for the immortal loss ever before her eyes. KAuteéw, kuteéw! In keeping with her ascetic nature the Pewee haunts solitary places, bleak hillsides swept by March gales, lava cliffs with their solemn, silent bastions. Or, since misery loves company, she ventures upon some waterless THE SAY PEWEE. 379 townsite and voices in unexpectant cadences the universal yearning for green things and cessation of wind. A part of the drear impression made by this bird is occasioned by the time of year when it puts in an appearance, March at the latest, and, once at least, as early as February 20th (in Yakima County). Flies are an uncertain crop at this season, and it is doubtless rather from a desire for shelter than from inclination to society, that the species has so largely of late years re- sorted to stables and outbuildings. Twenty years ago Say’s Pewee was un- known as a tenant of buildings in Yakima County. Now, there are few well-estab- lished farms in that part of the State which do not boast a pair somewhere about the premises; while hop-houses are recognized as providing just that degree of isolation which the bird really prefers. Say’s Pewee, for all its depressed spirits, is an active bird, and makes fre- quent sallies at passing insects. These constitute its exclusive diet save in early spring when, under the spell of adverse weather, dried berries are sought. But- terflies and moths are favorite food, but grasshoppers and beetles are captured as Photo by the Author. well; and the bird, in common with cer- tain other flycatchers, has the power of ejecting indigestible elytra and leg-sheath- ings in the form of pellets. SAY’S PEWEE. The males arrive in spring some days in advance of the females. Courtship is animated in spite of the melancholy proclivities of the bird; and the male achieves a sort of song by repeating ku-tew’s rapidly, on fluttering wing. Besides this, in moments of excitement, both birds cry Look at ‘ere, with great distinctness. Eggs are laid by the roth of April and usually at least two broods are raised, in this latitude. In the natural state these Pewees nest about cliffs, at moderate heights, and in shallow caves. In selectingya site, they show a decided preference for a cliff which enjoys the protection of nesting Prairie Falcons.