BREVIORA Museum of Comparative Zoology US ISSN 0006-9698 CAMBRIDGE, MaAss. 21 DECEMBER 2012 NUMBER 533 OBSERVATIONS ON THE SPECIALIZED PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THE PITCHFORK-MANDIBLED PONERINE ANT THAUMATOMYRMEX PALUDIS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) CHRISTIAN RABELING”’!, MANFRED VERHAAGHZ, AND MArcos V. B. GARCIA? AsstraAct. In this natural history note we describe and illustrate the specialized predatory behavior of the ponerine ant Thaumatomyrmex paludis from the Brazilian Amazon. This study of T. paludis implies that specialized predation on polyxenid millipedes is widespread in the genus Thaumatomyrmex. The observation that one T. paludis forager only partly depilated its prey before it started feeding suggests that complete depilation of polyxenids, as reported from 7. contumax, could be most important when prey items are fed to the larvae, presumably to protect the brood from irritating bristles. Our observations provide an additional example of the sympatric distribution of two Thaumatomyrmex species, further supporting the hypothesis that the genus consists of multiple, morphologically similar species. Resumo. Neste trabalho descrevemos e ilustramos 0 comportamento predatorio especializado da formiga do grupo Ponerinae Thaumatomyrmex paludis da Amazonia brasileira. Este estudo indica que 0 comportamento predatorio especializado em diplopodes da ordem Polyxenida é comum no género Thaumatomyrmex. Além disso, nossas observagoes indicam que as formigas forrageiras depilam a presa apenas parcialmente logo apos a captura para consumo imediato. Depilagao completa da presa, como descrito em T. contumax, parece ser mais importante quando a presa é usada para alimentar as larvas, sendo provavelmente praticada para a protec¢ao da cria contra cerdas irritantes. Este estudo ainda demonstra que uma outra espécie do género ocorre em simpatria com T. paludis. Estas observagdes corroboram a hipotese de que este género é composto por multiplas espécies morfologicamente similares. Key worpbs: predation; ants; sympatry; mandible morphology; Isopoda; Polyxenidae + Corresponding author e-mail address: crabeling@gmail. com 'Museum of Comparative Zoology Labs, Harvard INTRODUCTION University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massaschu- The mandibles of an ant are functionally Sethe Dee analogous to the hands of a human. They are °Staatliches Museum fiir Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Erb- ate Falcill : f k h prinzenstr. 13, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany. used to lullill a variety Of tasks such as nest 3Embrapa Amazonia Ocidental, Rodovia AM-10, Km building, defense against enemies, and ma- 29, Caixa Postal 319, Manaus, AM 69010-970, Brazil. | nipulating brood (Hd6lldobler and Wilson, © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2012. 1990). Most important, the mandibles are precision instruments for catching and han- dling prey. Ants have evolved diverse preda- tory behaviors, accompanied by an astounding variety of morphological specializations, in- cluding the sickle-shaped mandibles of isopod- hunting Leptogenys (Brown, 2000), the filigree forceps-like mandibles of Martialis heureka (Rabeling et al, 2008), and the trap jaws of dacetine springtail hunters and of Odontoma- chus ants (Bolton, 2000; Patek et al, 2006). The perhaps most astounding case of man- dibular morphological specialization in ants 1s the bizarre, pitchfork-shaped mandible of the Neotropical ponerine ants in the genus Thaumatomyrmex. The genus name, which translates approximately to “wondrous” or “marvelous” ant, emphasizes the outlandish appearance of these remarkable insects (Mayr, 1887). Since the discovery of the first Thaumato- myrmex species no doubt existed that these ants must be specialized predators. Specula- tions on the most likely prey organisms ranged from snails to termites to the brood of other ant species (Creighton, 1928; Weber, 1942; Kempf, 1975). However, no actual predatory behavior was observed and therefore the nature of the prey and the details about the function of Thaumatomyrmex’s mandibles remained a mystery for over a century. Diniz and Brandao (1989) finally solved the puzzle, reporting that Thaumatomyrmex ants are specialized predators of bristly miullipedes belonging to the family Polyxenidae (Diplo- poda: Polixenida: Polyxenidae; sensu Condé and Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 2008). These first observations were complemented by careful laboratory experiments on T: contumax and field observations on T: atrox from the Brazilian state of Bahia (Brandao et al., 1991). Additional feeding experiments conducted for T. contumax confirmed these results (Delabie et al., 2000; Jahyny et al., 2008). Polyxenid millipedes represent an unusual prey, because in contrast to heavily sclerotized 2 BREVIORA No. 533 and chemically well-protected millipede spe- cies, polyxenids are soft-bodied and rely on hooked bristles for defense (Eisner eft al, 1978). When attacked, they wipe hairs from a pair of bristle tufts at the caudal end of their bodies against the aggressor and when the attacker attempts to clean itself, the barbed hairs lock into the predator’s setae, interlink with one another, resulting in the predator’s complete immobilization (Eisner et al., 1996). So far, only Neotropical Thaumatomyrmex ants and the Indonesian ant species Probolo- myrmex dammermani are known to be spe- cialized predators of polyxenid millipedes (Brandao et al., 1991; Eisner et al, 1996; Ito, 1998). Our serendipitous finding of two rarely collected Thaumatomyrmex species during field studies in the Brazilian Amazon moti- vated this short natural history note. It provides information on the predatory be- havior of the Amazonian T. paludis and an additional example of sympatrically occur- ring Thaumatomyrmex species. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the late afternoon of 29 May 2003, a single stray Thaumatomyrmex worker was collected at the experimental agricultural field site of the Embrapa, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria, in Manaus, Ama- zonas, Brazil, located at kilometer 28 of Highway AM 010 (2°53’S, 59°59’W; 40-50 m above sea level). The worker was presumably foraging in the thick leaf litter layer of an agroforest, characterized by a diverse mix of fruit and nut trees. Thaumatomyrmex colo- nies are of minute size, sometimes containing fewer than five workers (Brandao et al, 1991; Delabie et al, 2000; Jahyny ef al, 2002). Our efforts to locate the colony failed, and we kept the single forager alive in a Petri dish to which we added leaf litter and a moist cotton swab to provide humidity. No food 2012 was added to the formicarium until the start of the feeding experiments on 31 May 2003. For the feeding trials, the ant was transferred into a watchmaker’s glass dish and different arthropods such as Drosophila flies, iso- pods, termites, and polyxenid millipedes were added to the arena. Photographs of the foraging worker were taken with a Nikon Coolpix 995, which was handheld to a Wild M-SA stereomicroscope. In June 2003, we collected a second T: paludis worker at the same agroforest site, carrying a polyxenid millipede between its mandibles, presumably returning to the nest. In addition, we collected a single worker of a second Thaumatomyrmex species in an adjacent patch of primary terra firme rain forest on 16 April 2003. We were not able to find the colonies of these ants either, and we did not conduct laboratory experiments with these individuals. To identify the individuals to species level, we used taxonomic keys published by Kempf (1975) and Jahyny et al. (2008). Morpho- metric measurements were taken as defined in Kempf (1975) and are given below. The two workers collected at the agroforest site were identified as T. paludis Weber, 1942 (as resurrected from synonymy by Jahyny et al., 2008; see also Longino, 1988) on the basis of the absence of the metanotal suture and the relatively short mandibles (Fig. 1). The morphometric measurements (given in mm) and indices (used as defined in Rabeling et al., 2007) for the two T. paludis individuals mea el (0.972 1,02). AL..(0.65,:0.65),. HW (65220761) ML (0:.61;,0.59)SL (0.57,,.0.55), CI (97, 94), SI (88, 85), MI (94, 91). The third Thaumatomyrmex individual, collected in a primary rain forest, could not be identified with certainty, but might be related to T. soesilae Makhan, 2007 (Fig. 1). However, the taxonomic identity of TJ. soesilae is uncertain, given the inadequacy of the original description and the unavailability of the holotype. The taxonomy of the genus PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THAUMATOMYRMEX PALUDIS 3 Thaumatomyrmex remains utterly confused and is in dire need of a comprehensive revision. Measurements and indices for the second unidentifiable species, hereafter re- ferted to. as. 1,0sp. Manaus 2, ate: WL (0.83), HL (0.55), HW (0.61), ML (0.69), SL fOr), eal), S).(86), MI .(125).. The specimens were deposited at the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo in Brazil and at the Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde in Karlsruhe, Germany. Indi- viduals were imaged at the Museum of Comparative Zoology using a _ Leica DFC420 digital camera mounted on a Leica MZ16 dissecting scope. Composite images were assembled using the Leica Application Suite (v. 3.7.0) and Helicon Focus (v. 5.2.9) software packages. RESULTS To study and document the predatory behavior of 7. paludis, we first placed the single worker into the foraging arena and subjected the individual to a cafeteria-style feeding experiment. First, a termite worker was added. The forager antennated the potential prey briefly, turned away, and continued foraging in the arena. Subsequent- ly, a Drosophila fly and an isopod were presented to the Thaumatomyrmex worker, soliciting the same response: brief antennat- ing followed by disregard. Only the release of a polyxenid millipede into the foraging arena immediately solicited predatory behavior from the 7. paludis worker, which followed the characteristic pattern described for T. contumax (Brandao et al., 1991). The milli- pede was first antennated by the forager, then briefly secured between the mandibles, stung, and released immediately afterward. The Thaumatomyrmex worker retreated and the millipede did not attempt to fling its barbed hairs against the attacker. After the victim was paralyzed, the worker returned, 4 BREVIORA No. 533 Figure |. Morphological comparison of Thaumatomyrmex individuals collected in Manaus, Brazil. Lateral view of T. paludis (A, C) and T. sp. Manaus 2 (E) and full face view of T. paludis (B, D) and T. sp. Manaus 2 (F). The scale bars represent 0.5 mm in all images. picked up the millipede with its mandibles, holding the armored caudal end of the millipede away from its body, with the ventral side facing toward the ant. Securing the millipede in this position, Thaumatomyr- mex started brushing the millipede with the stout and thickened setae on its fore tarsi, removing the tufts of setae from the lateral side of the millipede’s body close to the head. During the depilation, the ant fre- quently cleansed its legs, head, and antennae, potentially ridding itself of repellent chemi- cals contained in the lateral setae. After the removal of a single tuft of setae from one body segment and a second tuft of setae from the opposite side, the T. paludis worker started feeding on the ventral side of the millipede (Fig. 2). Interestingly, the polyxe- nid was not stripped of all its hairs before the ant started feeding (Fig. 2). During the feeding process, the mandibles were fre- quently removed from the millipede, and then reanchored in the soft tissue of its body, followed by a seesaw movement (Fig. 2), and the ant was licking up exuding hemolymph and tissue particles. Twelve minutes after the T. paludis worker first stung its prey, it stopped feeding, picked up the paralyzed 2012 PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THAUMATOMYRMEX PALUDIS WN Figure 2. Predatory behavior of Thaumatomyrmex paludis. A T. paludis worker feeds on a paralyzed and partly depilated polyxenid millipede (A, B). During the feeding, the worker frequently removes its mandibles from the soft millipede and reanchors them in the prey’s body, following a seesaw movement (C—E). Ventral view of the polyxenid showing the partial depilation and the feeding marks close to the cephalic region (F). millipede, and started walking around in the arena, holding the polyxenid head down. Presumably the forager was trying to return to the nest. The ant was monitored for an additional 30 minutes, but no further clean- ing or feeding behavior was observed. DISCUSSION Our observations show that the Amazo- nian 7. paludis preys on polyxenid milli- pedes, like its congeners T. contumax and T. atrox (Brandao et al, 1991; Delabie et al, 2000; Jahyny et al, 2008). The behavioral 6 BREVIORA sequence we observed is similar to that reported for 7. contumax, consisting of encountering, stinging, stripping, and de- vouring the prey (Brandao ef al, 1991; Delabie et al., 2000; Jahyny et al., 2008). In addition, our observations indicate that foragers may only partly depilate millipedes in the field to feed themselves before returning to the nest. Complete depilation of polyxenids is potentially most important when prey items are fed to the larvae, presumably to protect the soft-bodied im- matures from irritating bristles (Brandao et al, 1991). The observation that a second T. paludis forager carried a paralyzed poly- xenid millipede in the field suggests that specialized predation on polyxenids is a natural behavior exhibited by this species and not merely a behavioral artifact resulting from observation under laboratory conditions. Ecological factors, such as the highly spe- cialized predatory behavior and minute colony sizes, likely contribute to the fact that Thau- matomyrmex ants are rarely observed. Irre- spective of their relatively low abundance, the genus radiated into a remarkably diverse group, consisting of 12 described species, plus some undescribed taxa, that are distributed across different biomes in tropical and sub- tropical Latin America, including Cuba (Kempf, 1975; Baroni Urbani and De An- drade, 2003; Jahyny eft al, 2008). Our study provides an additional example of sympatric distribution of at least two Thaumatomyrmex species (Brandao et al., 1991; Delabie et al, 2000; Jahyny et al, 2008), further supporting the hypothesis that Thawmatomyrmex consists of multiple species, rather than few, morpho- logically variable species (Longino, 1988). Our collection records of T. paludis and T. sp. Manaus 2 further demonstrate that Thauma- tomyrmex is capable of inhabiting a variety of different habitats, ranging from primary rain forests to agroforest sites, consistent with observations on other Thaumatomyrmex spe- No. 533 cies (Kempf, 1975; Brandao et al, 1991; Delabie et al, 2000; Baroni Urbani and De Andrade, 2003; Jahyny et al., 2008). When observing Thaumatomyrmex work- ers preying on polyxenid millipedes, one has to wonder how the ants escape the deadly entanglement of the barbed polyxenid bris- tles (Eisner et al., 1996). Larger body size and immediate immobilization of the prey by stinging likely prevent workers from being killed by the polyxenid’s defense. In addi- tion, it seems noteworthy that the pilosity of T. paludis individuals was different in live and point-mounted individuals. In live indi- viduals the long body hairs were erect (Fig. 2), whereas they were appressed in dead individuals (Fig. 1). Cleaning of pre- served individuals in water demonstrated that the long hairs were very flexible, even in individuals that had been point mounted for years. It remains to be tested whether the flexible hairs provide a selective advantage to Thaumatomyrmex workers by not serving as anchor points for the millipedes’ barbed bristles and thereby preventing the deadly entanglement. Thaumatomyrmex’s mandibles beautifully illustrate the degree of extreme morpholog- ical specialization to which specialized be- havior can lead. The predatory habits of other contemporary species with bizarre mandibles remain unknown and _ natural history studies still need to explore what, for example, the armadillo ant Tatuidris of Mesoamerica (Brown and Kempf, 1967), the bizarre hook-mandibled Chimaeridris from tropical Asia (Wilson, 1989), and the Ama- zonian subterranean predator M. heureka (Rabeling et al, 2008) feed on. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study is a result of SHIFT Project ENV 52-2, a collaborative research initiative between the State Museum of Natural 2012 History Karlsruhe, Germany, and the Em- presa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa) in Manaus. We are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico and the Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renovaveis for providing permis- sion to conduct fieldwork in Brazil and we gratefully acknowledge the Bundesminister- ium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) and the Conselho National de Pesquisa e Tecno- logia (BMBFOILT0014/CNPq 690018/00-2) for providing funding for SHIFT Project ENV52-2. CR acknowledges financial sup- port from the Ernst Mayr Travel Grant in Animal Systematics (Museum of Compara- tive Zoology), the Green Fund (Harvard University), and the Harvard Society of Fellows. We thank Stefan Cover, Benoit Jahyny, Jack Longino, Phil Ward, and two anonymous reviewers for stimulating discus- sions about Thaumatomyrmex biology and taxonomy; their helpful suggestions greatly improved earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Simone Cappel- lari for her help with translating the abstract into Portuguese. LITERATURE CITED BARONI URBANI, C., AND M. L. DE ANDRADE. 2003. The ant genus Thaumatomyrmex in Cuba (Hymenop- tera: Formicidae) with description of two new species. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse, 76: 263-277. Botton, B. 2000. The ant tribe Dacetini. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 65: 1—1028. BRANDAO,. ©. Ro Fs J. LL.M. Diniz; AND E. M. ToMoTAKE. 1991. Thaumatomyrmex strips milli- pedes for prey: a novel predatory behaviour in ants, and the first case of sympatry in the genus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux, 38: 335-344. Brown, W. L. 2000. Diversity of ants. Jn D. Agosti, J. D. Majer, L. E. Alonso, and T. R. Schultz eds. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Washington, DC, Smithsonian Insti- tution Press. PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THAUMATOMYRMEX PALUDIS Z —, AND W. W. Kemper. 1967. Tatuidris, a remark- able new genus of Formicidae (Hymenoptera). Psyche, 74: 183-190. ConpE, B., AND M. NGuyen Duy-JACQUEMIN. 2008. Classification actuelle des diplopodes pénicillates (Myriapodes) avec nouvelles définitions des taxa. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 133: 291-302. CREIGHTON, W. 1928. A new species of Thaumatomyr- mex from Cuba. Psyche, 35: 162-166. DELaABIE, J. H. C., D. FRESNEAU, AND A. PEZON. 2000. Notes on the ecology of Thaumatomyrmex spp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) in south- east Bahia, Brazil. Sociobiology, 36: 571-584. Diniz, J. L. M., AND C. R. F. BRANDAo. 1989. Feeding behavior of Thaumatomyrmex. Notes from Under- ground, 2: 13, Available from: http://www.notesfrom underground.org/archive/oldnotes/nfu2.pdf. EIsNerR, T., ALsop, D., Hicks, K., AND J. MEINWALD. 1978. Defensive secretions of millipeds. Jn S. Bettini (ed.), Arthropod venoms. Handbuch der Experimen- tellen Pharmakologie. Berlin, Springer Verlag. , M. EISNER, AND M. Deyrup. 1996. Millipede defense: use of detachable bristles to entangle ants. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93: 10848-10851. HO_LLpDoBLeER, B., AND E. O. Witson. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. Ito, F. 1998. Colony composition and _ specialized predation on millipedes in the enigmatic ponerine ant genus Probolomyrmex (Hymenoptera, Formici- dae). Insectes Sociaux, 45: 79-83. JAHYNY, B., J. H. C. DELABIE, AND D. FRESNEAU. 2002. Mini-sociétés sans reine chez le genre néotropical Thaumatomyrmex Mayr, 1887 (Formicidae: Poner- inae). Actes des Colloques Insectes Sociaux, 15: 33-37. , ». LAcAu, J. H. C. DELABIE, AND D. FRESNEAU. 2008. Le genre Thaumatomyrmex Mayr 1887, cryptique et prédateur spécialiste de Diplopoda Penicillata. In E. Jiménez, F. Fernandez, T. M. Arias, and F. H. Lozano-Zambrano eds., Sistemd- tica, Biogeografia y Conservacion de las Hormigas Cazadoras de Colombia. Bogota, Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt. Kemper, W. W. 1975. A revision of the Neotropical ponerine ant genus Thaumatomyrmex Mayr (Hy- menoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 18: 95-126. Loncino, J. T. 1988. Notes on the taxonomy of the neotropical ant genus Thaumatomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Jn J. C. Trager (ed.), 8 BREVIORA Advances in Myrmecology. Leiden, the Netherlands, Ee Jarl MAKHAN, D. 2007. Thaumatomyrmex soesilae sp. nov. from Suriname (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Calo- derma Supplementary Paper, 58: \—3. Mayr, G. 1887. Siidamerikanische Formiciden. Ver- handlungen der kaiserlich-koniglichen zoologisch- botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 37: 511-632. PATEK, S., J. BAlo, B. FISHER, AND A. SUAREZ. 2006. Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 12787-12792. RABELING, C., J. M. BRowN, AND M. VERHAAGH. 2008. Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early No. 533 ant evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105: 14913-14917. , 9. P. Cover, R. A. JOHNSON, AND U. G. MUELLER. 2007. A review of the North American species of the fungus-gardening ant genus Trachymyrmex (Hyme- noptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 1664: 1—53. Weser, N. A. 1942. The genus Thaumatomyrmex Mayr with description of a Venezuelan species (Hym.: Formicidae). Boletin de Entomologia Venezolana, 1: 65-71. WILson, E. O. 1989. Chimaeridris, a new genus of hook- mandibled myrmicine ants from tropical Asia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux, 36: 62-69.