tihvavy of t:he theological ^tmimxy PRINCETON • NEW JERSEY Samuel Miller in memory of Judge Samuel Miller Breckinridge 7772^ V.3 BRIEF RETROSPECT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. PART THE FIRST j IN THREE VOLUMES: CONTAINING A SKETCH OF THE REVOLUTIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN SCIENCE, ARTS, AND LITERATURE, DURING THAT PERIOD. BY SAMUEL MILLER, A.M. ONE OF THF. MINISTERS OF THE UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURGHEj, IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN PHILO- SOPHICAL SOCIETY, AND CORRESPONDING 5TEMBEU OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MASSACHUSETTS. VOL. IIL Pi-iiitcd at New York. LONDON : IrEPRIXTED FOR J.JOHNSON, ST. PAUL's CHURCHYARli, Bij E/krion great English poets, madQ tjie following remark : " Dryden, in my opinion, did more to improve English versification than Pope : the interval is wider between Dryden and the best of his predecessors, than between Dryden and Pope.'-' Chap. XX.] Poetrij. . 8 done their best ; and what shall be added will be the eftbrt of tedious toil Hud needless curio- sity*." English poetry is also indebted to several who have written since Mr. Pope. The names of these, and the nalure and amount of the services which they rendered, will be more fully brought to the mind of the intelligent reader in reviewing hereafter the particular works by wiiich they are most honourably known to the public. About the beo-innins: of the seventeenth cen- tury there was a race of versifiers in Europe, and especially in Great Britain, vvho have been called by the critics metaphysical poets 'f. They were generally men of learning, and niany of them en- dowed with genius ; but were either destitute of taste, or possessed only that vvhich was false and perverted. Pedantic, subtle, obscure, and con- fused, they presented absurd and gross conceits, rather than just images ; scholastic refmements, rather than copies of nature ; and far-fetched ideas and illustrations, to display their reading, rather than that chaste simplicity v\diich delights, and that " noble expanse of thought which fdls the whole mind." This race of poets, if such they may be called, did not become extinct till toward the close of the seventeenth century. Cowle\-, Waller, Denham, and many others, were infected with the false taste which they had propagated, and thus extended the mischief. Milton, though he adopted, in one instance, the manner of these metaphysical versifiers, yet in general disdained * ^ife of Pope, by Johnson. t ^'/* ^f Coiiley, by Johnson. 4 Poetry. [Chap. XX, it, and contributed much to discourage the un- worthy fashion. Dryden went still further, in some respects, in rectifying the public taste. But toward the close of the century a style of poetry which had so long, and on such high authority, maintained its ground, ceased to be popular. The English poetry of the eighteenth century, there- fore, is in general more delicate in its sentiments, more correct and elegant in its diction, more chaste in. its figures and illustrations, more har- monious in its numbers, and on the whole more simple and natural in its structure, than that of any preceding age. The impro^ ements in French poetry, in the cen- tury under consideration, though worthy of no- tice, have been less numerous and remarkable. With the nature of these, however, and the persons to whom the honour of effecting them is chiefly due, the author is not sufficiently acquainted to enable him to speak distinctly. In improving the poetry of Italy, Spain, and Portugal, it is believed that still less has been done within the last hun- dred years ; but of this, also, too little is known to warrant an attempt to give any distinct views of the subject. The poetic character of Germany rose to great eminence in the latter half of the eighteenth cen- tury. Amiong the earliest and most successful labourers in attuning the German language to poetry were Haller, Kleist, Klopstock, Gesner, and Wieland. Before the works of these great literary reformers appeared, this language could scarcely boast of any poems superior to those of Gottsched and Schoonaik. A poetic diction wa^ CilAP. XX.] Poetry. 3 to be formed. Aecordingly baron Haller is said to have written his poem on Reason, Superstition, and Infidelity, for the express purpose of proving that the German language was capable of an ad- vantageous application to moral and philosophical poetry. It was before remarked, that Klopstock was eminently successful in improving the versi- fication of his native language. His Messiah, on its first appearance, was seyerely criticised on ac- count of the novel expressions and combinations which it contained J but these innovations soon gained credit, and were generally adopted ; and the author may be said to have formed a new era in German poetry. Gesner and Wieland carried these improvements still further. Beside these, the writings of Gellert, Lessing, Gleim, and se- veral others, have contributed largely to enrich and refme the versification of their country ; in- somuch that the poetry of Germany, which, half a century ago, was scarcely thought worthy of no- tice, may be reckoned at the present day among the most polished, harmonious, and spirited, in the republic of letters. The poetry of Sweden received, during the same period, improvements of a similai' nature. About the middle of the century arose Pahlin, the father of Swedish poetry. He attained high excellence in the epic, tragic, and lyric departments of po- etic composition, and contributed much towards establishing the reign of taste in his country. To him many successors have arisen, some of whom have pursued with honourable success the same track. Among these, the most conspicuous are ipouiit de Creutz, count de Gyllenborg, madame 6 Poehy. [Chap. XX. de Kordeiiflyclit^ count Oxenstierna, Kellgren, Leopold, Lidner, Torild, and several others, whose writings abundantly testify, that the Swedish lan- guage, notwithstanding its former defects, is ca- pable of exhibiting, under the hand of a master, all that harmony, tenderness, and force, which, when united, render the productions of the poet so interesting. The labours of Kellgren, in parti- cular, for a number of years past, to polish and refine the versification of his country, are said to have been eminently si]%essful, and highly ho- iiourable to his character *. The poetry of Russia is almost wholly the growth of the eighteenth century. Cantemir, Ilin- L^ki, Frediatofski, and a few others, adventured in this new field at a very early period of the cen- tury ; but they were rather rhymers than poets. The first respectable jDoet in the Russian language Was Lomonozof, who wrote about the middle of the century. His compositions are principally of the lyric kind, which, for originality, energy of lan- guage, and sublimity of sentiment, deserve much praise. He was followed in this career of improve- ment by Sumorokof, who is represented as the founder of the Russian drama, and one of the most successful refiners of the poetic language of his country. To these succeeded a number of poets, who all contributed something to improve the ver- sification of this language ; among the most distin- guished of whom arc Kheraskof and Karamsin. The Jlossiada of the former, as it has been greatly admired by the author's countrymen, so its ap- * See Catteau's Fzetv of Sivedm, and Acerbi's Travels. Sect. I.] Epic Poetry. "J }3earance doubtless formed an important era in the progress of their poetic character. The various works of Karamsin are also entitled to respectful notice among the valuable contributions to this branch of literary improvement. After these preliminary remarks concerning the refinements and riches which have been commu- nicated to the poetic language , of several coun- tries of Europe, it may be proper to take a brief review of the principal productions to which the eighteenth century gave birth, in the various de- partments of poetry ; after which the way will be prepared for some general reflexions on the poetic character of the age. SECTION I. EPIC POETRY, In Epic poetry the period of this Retrospect produced few specimens above mediocrity. The Henriadt of Voltaire stands at the head of the list. This performance, like most of the works of its celebrated author*, discovers great genius, and * Few literary men in the eighteenth century rendered them- selves more conspicuous than Francis Arouct do Voltaire. He t\as born in 1694-, at Paris, where he died in 1778. Endowed with an uncommon share of wit, hmnour. fancAr, and taste, he was distinguished as an interesting and entertaining writer for more than half a century. He enjoyed a high reputation, not only as an epic poet, but also as a dramatist, an ixistoriau, a uo^ S Poetry. [ChaP. XX', has been the subject of high applause, particularly among French critics. For boldness of concep- tion, general felicity of language, and just and noble sentiments, it is entitled to honourable di- stinction. But, from a real or supposed inaptitude of the French language for the majestic character of epic composition ; from the indiscreet choice of a modern hero, and a recent train of events in the author's own country, as the subject ; and from some egregious faults in the incidents and ma- chinery ; the best critics have denied to this poem the praise of first-rate excellence. The Leonidas of Mr. Glover is one of the most meritorious efforts in the department of epic poe- try which English literature, presented during the age under consideration*. This work has long maintained a high character among English cri- tics. The Calvary of Mr. Cumberland is entitled to the next place ; a poem which has been pro- nounced to be " imbued with the genuine spirit of Milton, and destined, therefore, most probably, to immortality." Though the author has not, perhaps, given sufficient scope to his imagination, but confined himself too closely to the sacred hi&^ velist, an essayist, and a miscellaneous writer. His talents were 90 various, that there is scacely any department of literary labour in which he has not left something, which, taken alone, would show him to have been an eminent man. It is to be lamented that his talents were so much devoted to the cause of impiety and licentiousness ; and that he so often betrayed a willingness to set all principle, truth, and decorum at defiance, for the purpose of attacking the religion and the character of Christians. * Glover "wrote a second epic poem, entitled The Atheniad, which has been praised, but is generally considered «^s infcricjf to his Leonidas, ?ECT. I.] Epic Toetry. % tory, for the full exertion of his poetic strength, yet both the plan and execution of his work do him immortal honour, and afford high pleasure both to the critic and the Christian. Joan of Arc, by Mr. Southey, while it obviously betrays the haste and carelessness with which it was writ- ten*, discovers at the same time the undoubted genius and taste of the author f. The sentiments in general are noble and generous ; the characters introduced are for the most part well supported; the imagery is bold and impressive ; and the ver- siiication, without being always correct, is easy, harmonious, and beautiful. To these may be added The Epigoniad, by Dr. WilkieJ; Arthury or the Northern Enchantment, by INIr. Hole ; and se- veral other epic poems, which, though not enti- tled to rank with those above mentioned, yet do credit to the poetic talents of their respective writers. But if no poet since the time of Milton have honoured our language with a work which de- serves to be compared with the Paradise Lost, yet this period has not passed without two impor- tant events: the Iliad, that great parent stock * Joan of Arc probably furnishes the first instance in the history of literature of an epic poem of equal length being -written in six xveeks ! t In the composition of Joan of Arc Southey was assisted by his friend Coleridge, a poet of great genius and taste. X The Epigoniad, by the rev. Dr. William Wilkie of North Britain, is an epic poem of some nierit, but far from being enti- tled to a place in the first class. This writer has been called the *' Homer of Scotland." His work was first published in 1757, ?nd reached a secqnd editiou i» 1759. He died at St. Andrews in 1772. to , Poetry, [CiiAF. XX, of epic productions^ ^vas incorporated with En- glish poetry, in the course of the century, by the genius of Mr. Pope; and Fingal and Temo- ra were recalled from a long oblivion by the labours of Mr. Macpherson. In the former, this age may boast of having produced the noblest translation ever presented to the republic of let- ters; and in the latter, of having recovered a work of true and uncommon genius, which, on several accounts, will probably be read with plea- sure for many centuries to come, whatever opinion may be formed with respect to its origin*. The history of German literature, during the eighteenth centurj^, presents us Avith an epic poem which some have brought into competition with the Paradise Lost. This is the Messiah of Klop- stockf, a work v/hich has been, perhaps, more read throughout the literary world, and honoured with more general approbation, than any other poetic production of the same country. The Messiah certainly may be, in some respects, ad- vantageously compared with the Paradise Lost. Though the former does not possess the " gigantic sublimity" of the latter, yet it elevates the mind by the grandeur and novelty of its fiction, and displays more tenderness and pathos f. The * The poems of Oss'ian, a little before the close of the century, were translated into Italian, by Caesarotti, with great elegance. f This illustrious poet of Gennany, whose works do honour "to his country and his agfe, was born in 1724-. The first part of h\s Messiah was published in H^S, and the remainder in 1773. He died toward the close of the j^ear 1 802, "X Herder, an eloquent German -wTiter, thus compares the Poa. fudise Lost and The Messiah : " The edifice of Milton i? * Sted^ Sect. I.] Epk Poetry^ 11 Death of Abel is not less familiar to every intelli- gent reader, and its merits have been generally acknowledged*. Oberon'fy air epic romance, bj Wieland, discovers the bold and vigorous imagi- nation, and the felicity of description, for which the author has been long celebrated J. In the Swedish language we also find, in the century under review, two respectable produc- tions of the epic class. The first is entitled Szve- dish Liberty, and is a performance of Dahlin, who was before mentioned as the father of poetry in fast and well-pl;mnetl building, resting on ancient columns ; Klopstock's is an enchanted dome, echoing Avith the softest and purest tones of human feeling, hovering between heaven and earth, borne on angels' shoulders. Milton's muse is masculine : Klopstock's is a tender woman, dissolving in pious ecstasies, warbling elegies and hymns. When Music shall acquire among us the highest powers of her art, Avhose words will she select to utter bijt those of Klopstock ?" Letters on Humanisatiofu This is quoted from the Literary Hours of Dr. Drake, wh(t says that " impartial posterity avIU probably confirm the judgement of Herder." A good English translation of The Messiah is still a desideration. * The Death of Abel, like several other works of the same' author, is written in a kind of loose poetry, unshackled by rhpue and a precise uniform adherence to measure. It has been said that this method of writing is peculiarly suited to the Ger- man language. It is to be lamented that this work, as well as the Messiah, has never been advantageously pj-esented in an Eqglish dress. f Oheron has been translated b)^ Mr. Sotheby into English, in a style' of elegance which does him great honour. t Oberon, though the best, is not the only epic poem produced by Wieland. His Llris, his Neucn Amad/s, and his Liebe um Liebe, were prior in time, but inferior in merit. They have, however, been highly commended, particularly by the critics itt the author's own country, 12 Poetry.' [Chap. XX. that country. This work, with several essential faults, combines beauties and excellences which render it worthy of attention. The otlier work which comes under the same denomination is The Passage of the Belt, by count de Gyllenborg, from which the author has derived considerable reputation among his countrymen. The Rossiada of Kheraskof, a Russian nobleman, was before mentioned as entitled to respectful notice, not only because it possesses considerable merit as a poem, but because it was the first successful atr tempt to inlist the Russian language in the ser- vice of the epic muse, and because its appearance may be considered as forming an important epoch in the history of Russian poetry. The translations of different epic poems, in the course of this century, were so numerous, that to give a list and character of them all would lead us into a field far too extensive. But it would be impardonable, even in this short sketch, to omit taking notice of a few beside those which have been already mentioned. The celebrated Italian epic poem Giemisalemme Liberata^ by Tasso, has also been elegantly translated into English, during this period, by Mr. Hoole. The first three books had been previously presented in an English dress by Mr. Brooke ; on whose work Mr. Hoole passes the most Ii];)eral encomiums. To give a version of the whole was reserved for the latter gentle- man, who executed the task with very honoura- ble success. Shortly afterwards, the Lusiad of Camoens, on which the Portuguese rest their claim to epic honours, was translated into English by Mr. Micklc, which, in spirit and elegance, is cou? Sect. I.] Epic Poetnj. i$ sidered by some respectable critics, as- rivalling the first productions of the kind in our language *. The Iliad was translated, for the first time, and with considerable ability, into the Spanish lan- guage, about thirteen years ago, by don Garcia Malo. The same monument of Grecian genius was also translated not long since, with high re- putation, into the German language, by Voss, a distinguished poet of tliat country ; and into Ita- lian by the abate Caesarotti, These several works are said to be considered, by their respective coun- trymen, as productions of the first class. To these may be added the translation of the Iliady into English blank verse, by Mr. Cowper, which, though a more faithful version than the work of Mr. Pope, falls short of it with respect to merit as a poem")*. The JEneid has also been trans- lated into German, by Voss, before mentioned ; into Italian by AT C. Bendi ; and into English by Mr. C. Pitt. The work of the last-named poet, tiiough inferior to Dryden's translation in vigour and sprightliness, yet excels it in uuiformity, correctness, and splendour of versification. Lu- can's Pharsalia, as translated into English by Rowe, is pronounced by an eminent critic to b^ one of the greatest productions of English poetry ; to exhibit more successfully than almost any * It Is the opinion of some good judges that the Luxiad of Mickle is much superior to the Lusiad of Camoens. The trans- lator has certainly, in some respects, improved on the original, and made many additions. -}- This translation, however, has great merit as a poem. In- i^ced Gilbert Wakefield observes, that whoever wishes to see Homer in an English dress, must read Cuwper's version. U Poetry. [Chap. XX. ather the gentius and spirit of the original ; and to deserve a mtich higher degree of approbation than it has generally obtained *, SECTION II. DIDACTIC POETRY. In this species of poetic composition the eigh- teenth century produced some works of great ex- cellence, a few of which may be compared, without disadvantage, with the best specimens of any pre- ceding age. The Ess-ay on Criticism, by Mr. Pope, as i^ was one of his earliest compositions, so it is also one of his best f . In the opinion of a great critic " it exhibits every mode of excellence that can embellish or dignify didactic composi- tion ; selection of matter, novelty of arrangement, justness of precept, splendour of illustration, and propriety of digression." The Essay o?z Man J, by the same author, though in some re- * Life ofRowe, by Johnson. f He produced this work at twenty years of age, and is pro- nounced by Dr. Johnson never afterwards to have excelled it. % It has been often said that lord Bolingbroke had somo agency in the composition of the Essay on Man. The following extract of a letter from the late reverend Dr. Hugh Blair, of Edin- burgh, will probably be considered as deciding the fact. " In the year 1763, being at London, I was carried by Dr. John Blair, prebendary of Westminster, to dine at old lord Bathurst's, The conversation turning on Mr. Pope, lord Bathurst told ns, that the Essay on Man was originally composed by lord BoUng" Sect. II.] Didactic Poetri). \$ spects of inferior excellence, has been incompara- bly more read, and, in general, more highly- ap- plauded.. This performance is not distinguished by miicli novelty of sentiment, or felicity of in- vention; but seldom have common ideas been presented with so much " b«;'.auty of embellish- ment," or so much " sweetness of melody." Sel- dom have opinions of questionable propriety been more happily disguised, or exhibited with such " dazzling splendour of imagery," and " seduc- tive powers of eloquence." The Fleece, by Mr. Dyer, notwithstanding the small degree of di- stinction which it has attained, is pronounced, by good judges, to stand among the most excellent poems of the didactic kind which the moderns, have produced. Tlie Pleasures of the Imagina- tion, by Dr. Akcnside, is also a performance wiiich belongs to this class; and is, doubtless, one of the most beautiful specimens that our language af- fords. Genius, learnmg, taste, pure morality, and liberal philosophy, shine in every page. Dr. Armstrong, in his celebrated poem on the Art of Presey^ving Health, though he did not aim at so elevated a strain as Akenside, lias produced a_ broke, in prose, and that Mr. Pope did no more than piU it into verse: that he had read lord Bolingbroke's manuscript in hi* own hand-writing, and remembered Avell that he Mas at a loss whether most to admire the elegance of lord Bolingbroke's prose, or the beauty of Mr. Pope's verse. When lord Bathurst told this, Mr. Mallet bade me attend, and remember this remark- ^able piece of information ; as by the course of nature! might survive his lordship, and be a witness of his having said so." — Bosuell's Life o/Johason^ vol. iii, p. 133. IG Poetiy. [Chap. XX- work of high excellence *. Never sinking below the dignity of his subject, he is always chaste, correct, instructive, and elegant. The Grave, a didactic poem, by Blair, is a work of great merit, and general popularity; highly poetical in its diction, and just and elevated in its sentiments. The English Garden of Mr. Mason, may also be mentioned as a very finished and interesting specimen of didactic composition. Simple, natu- ral, and interesting in his descriptions, luminous and instructive in his philosophy, and purely mo- ral in his sentiments, he is by no means the least of those authors on whose works the honour of English poetry, for the last fifty years, miist rest. In the Botanic Garden, by Dr. Darwin, there is a bold attempt " to inlist Imagination under the banner of Science," to an extent beyond example. In this attempt the author has been successful to a degree which does him much honour as a poet. He unites great extent of learning with singular variety and felicity of allusion, and a pleasing harmony and splendour of versification. But it must be acknowledged that there is a unifor- mity, which at length fatigues, and does not so much interest the reader as many less correct and less regular performances f , The Minstrel, by Dr. * Lord Monboddo pronounces this poem to be the best speci- men of didactic poetry in the English language, and equal to any, ancient or modern. — Origin and Progress of Language. ■f It has been suggested that the author of the Loves of the Plants v/as considerably indebted to the Connubia Florian of de la Croix, both in the plan and execution of his work. This beautiful Latin poem was first published in France, about the Sect. K.] Didactic Poetry. 17 Beattie, which may without impropriety be men- tioned under this head, beside the most engag- ing pictures of nature, abounds in the richest sen- timental, moral, and poetical beauties. The Es- says on Painting, History, and Epic Poetry, by Mr. Hayley, though partaking of the historical and descriptive, are also didactic in their charac- ter, and exhibit a very large share of erudition, correctness, elegance, and poetic taste. Beside the specimens of didactic poetry above mentioned, English literature furnished a num- ber of others, during the period under considera- tion, which, though not in the first rank of ex- cellence, are yet entitled to respectful notice. The Chace, by Somerville, to a just and intellir gent view of its subject, adds felicity and variety of description, and elegance of language. The Infancy of Dr. Downman discovers him to have been a good poet, an excellent medical philoso- pher, and a friend to morality and virtue. The year 1727, and was reprinted at Loaidon, with notes and obser- vations by sir Richard Clayton, in 1791. If Dr. Darwin had ever seen de la Croix's work (which can scarcely be question- ed) some deduction must be made from his claim to originality. Still, however, the Botanic Garden will be entitled to no small share of applause as a poem. Though many of the opinions of the author must be considered as erroneous; though his poetry evinces more taste than genius, more labour than invention, and. displays more meretricious glare than chaste ornament; and though much of the praise which was bestowed on the work soon after its appearance must be deemed extravagant; yet since the author of the Pursuits of Literature pronounced judge- ment upon it, its poetic character has perhaps, in the estimation of many, sunk too low. Dr. Darwin is far from standing at the head of modern ^oets; but he holds a place greatly abov« me- diocrity. Vol. III. C 18 Poetry. [Chap. XX. Miiie, a dramatic poem, by Mr. Sargent, is con- sidered by good judges as a work of genuine philo- sophical and poetical merit. And the English Ora- toi\ and Local Attachment, by Mr. Polwhele, dis- play much excellent sentiment and just precept, in very harmonious verse. With the didactic poetry produced on the con- tinent of Europe during the last age, the author has but little acquaintance. The Prcedium Rustic cum of father Vaniere, a Jesuit of France, pub- lished about the beginning of the century, has been ever since celebrated in the literary world as a specimen of elegant Latin poetry, connected with excellent precepts and just sentiments. The Connubia Florum of M. de la Croix, also a La- tin poem, and published a few years after the Prcedium Rusticuiriy is scarcely less remarkable for the purity, vivacity, and elegance of its dic- tion, the ingenuity of its fable and imagery, and the general soundness of its philosophy. Father Boscovich's poem, De Solis ac Lunte Defectihusy has been pronounced an ingenious and able pro- duction. The abbe Delille, in his Garden, a di- dactic and descriptive work, presented his coun* trymen with a poem, which, though it does not display great invention, has been highly and justly applauded for the beauty of its descriptions, and the excellence of its versification *. To these * " Voltaire, in his discourse pronounced at hi^ reception into the French academy, gives several reasons why the poets of that country have not succeeded in describing rural scenes and em- ployments. The principal one is, the ideas of meanness, po- verty, and wretchedness, which the French are accustomed t» associate with the professiou of husbandry. The same thing is Sect. III.] Moral and Devotional Poetry. 19 may be added baron Haller's poem on Reason, Supersiitiony and Infidelity, before mentioned, and which is worthy of its iUustrious author ; Die Natur, the Anti-Ovid, and the Musarion, of AVie- land, which have been much commended; and the various didactic poems of Hagedorn, Gieseke, Kastner, Vz, and Dusch, also Germans, waiich have bfeen spoken of b}^ the critics of their own country with high respect. SECTION III. MORAL AND DEVOTIONAL POETRY. The moral poetry of .the eighteenth century may without hesitation be pronounced superior, in the union of correctness, purity, and elegance, to that of any preceding age. This superiority is so remarkable, that it must arrest the attention of the most careless observer, and give pleasure to every friend of human happiness^ The age, alluded to by the abbe Delille, in the preliminary discourse pre- fixed to his translation of the Georgics. ' A translation/ says he, * of this poem, if it had been undertaken by an author. of genius, would have been better calculated than any other work for add- ing to the riches of our language. A version of the JEneid it- self, however well executed, would, in this respect, be of less utility; inasmuch as the genius of our tongue accommodates it- self more easily to the description of heroic achievements, than to the details of natural phenomena, and of the operations of husbandry. To force it to express these with suitable dignity, would have been a real conquest over that false delicacy which it has contracted from our unfortunate prejudices." — Ste\\ art's Ele- ments qf the Fhilowplij/ of JSIind, Part II, chap, v, § 2, second edit. Ct.' 20 Poetry, [Chap. X^^, it is readily admitted, gave birth to much licen- tious poetry ; but it produced/ at the same time, much that exhibits a degree of purity and eleva- tion of sentiment to which the history of litera- ture furnishes no parallel. The Night Thoughts^ and the Universal Passion^ by Dr. Young, are entitled to the first place iii this list *. In these works the celebrated author has employed wonderful sublimity and force of imagination, eloquence and cogency of reasoning, and music of numbers, in conveying the most im- portant truths that can engage the attention of mankind. The Ethical Epistles and some other moral productions of Pope, are models in their kind which have never been excelled. The Va- nity of Human Wishes , a poem in imitation of the tenth satire of Juvenal, by Dr. Johnson, has been pronounced as high an effort of ethic poetry as any language can show. The Tasjiy by Mr. Cow- per f , is one of the signal honours of the age, in this class of poetic compositions. For purity of sentiment, chasteness of description, simplicity and energy of style, and a vein of original and w^ell-directed satire, this work will be admired as long as taste and virtue exist. The eighteenth century is also distinguished * The reverend Edward Young was born in 1031. The Last Day, his first poetical work of much distinction, was published in 1704. His Night Thoughts were published about the yea? 1740. He died in 1765. t William Cowper was born in 1731. He was not only one of the greatest poets, but also one of the most pious, amiable, and benevolent men, of the age. An interesting account of his life and writings has been given by his friend, and contemporary peet. Mr^ Hayley. Hedi«d in 1800. Sect. HI.] Moral and Dcvotioiial Poetry. 21 by the Devotional poetry which it produced. The difficulty of this species of composition has been found and acknowledged, at all periods in which it was undertaken. Before the commencement of the age under consideration, theological doctrines, and portions of sacred history, had been made the subject of poetry, by a number of distinguished writers. Versions of the Psalms had been parti- cularly attempted by several persons with tole- rable success. Among these the version of Brady and Tate held the first place in the English lan- guage. Indeed some parts of their work were so well performed, that, comparatively, few of their successors have attained equal excellence. But among all the sacred poetry of the eigh- teenth century, that of Dr. Watts stands pre- eminent. His plan of evangelising the Psalms of David, and accommodating them to the worship of God under the present dispensation, as it was equally new and ingenious, so it has received an unusual degree of approbation, and has perhaps been more useful than any other work in this de- partment of composition that was ever presented to the world. Simplicity, smoothness, harmony, and pious elevation, remarkably characterise his verse. Next to the sacred poetry of Dr. Watts, the specimens produced by Mr. Addison, Dr. Doddridge, Mr. Pitt, Mr. Merrick, Dr. Blacklock, Mr. Logan, and several others, possess a high de- gree of merit. To these, the immortal name of Cow per ought to be added, as holding a place in the first rank. The orthodoxy of his faith, and the fervour of his piety, joined to his great talents, fitted him preeminently for this species of composition. 22 Poetry, [Chap. XX. Poetical versions of the Psalms made, during this period, on the continent of Europe, were nu- merous ; but of these a very small portion are worthy of notice. . The Hymns of Gellert, a cele- brated poet of Germany, are said to be entitled to a place in the first class of this kind of writings. The Hymns oi Kleist, Cramer, Klopstock, Schlegel, and Herder, of the same country, have also received high praise among persons of piety and taste. SECTION IV. SATIRICAL POETRY. In this department of poetry the eighteenth centijfy is, on the whole, superior to any pre- ceding age. Two satirical poets of great emi- nence had flourished in Europe toward the close of the preceding age. Boileau and Dryden, equal in most respects to the great Roman satirists, and in some superior to them all, brought modern satire to a very high degree of excellence. Dry- den was the first who displayed with success the power of the English language in this kind of composition. In the eighteenth century the can- didates for , satirical fame were numerous ; and in variety of manner, correctness of taste, purity of virtue, and, in some instances, in wit, humour, and force of ridicule, may be said to have exceed- ed all their predecessors. In this list Mr. Pope is entitled to the first place. His Satirical Epistles, his Imitations ©f I Sect. IV.] Satirical Poetry. 25 the ancient satirists, his Diinciad*^ and several other performances of a similar kind, have been long admired. In keenness of satire, energy of description, condensation of thought, and vivaci- ty and correctness of style, he is perhaps supe- rior to all who went before him : and though the moral tendency of some of his pictures may be questioned, yet he lashes vice with great force and effect f. The Love of Fame the Universal * Some of the Images in the Dunciad are very gross and dis- gusting. Pope had too much of that fondness for impure ideas which was so conspicuous, and carried so much further, in the writings of Swift. f The author of the Pursuits of Literature thus speaks of this great poet : " The sixth and last of this immortal brotherhood, (the Satirists) in the fulness of time, and in the maturity of poetical power, came Pope. All that was wanting to his illustrious pre- decessor found its consummation in the genius, knowledge, cor- rect sense, and condensation of thought and expression, which distinguished this poet. The tenour of his life was peculiarly favourable to his office. He had/rs^ cultivated all the flowery grounds of poetry. He had excelled in description, in pastoral, in the pathetic, and in general criticism ; and had given an En- glish existence in perpetuity to the father of all poetry. Thus honoured, and with these pretensions, he left them all for that ex- cellence, for which the maturity of his talents and judgement so eminently designed him. Familiar with the great ; intimate with the polite; graced by the attentions o{ the fair; admired by the learned ; a favourite with the nation ; independent in an acquir- ed opulence, the honourable product of his genius and industry; the companion of persons distinguished for birth, high fashion, rank, wit, or virtue ; resident in the centre of all public infor- mation and intelligence; every avenue to knowledge and every mode of observation were open to his curious, prying, piercing, and unwearied intellect. His works are so generally read and studied, that I should not merely fatigue, but I should almost in- sult you by such a needless disquisition." 24 Foetnj. [Chap. XX. Passion^ by Dr. Young, though mentioned under a preceding head, is also entitled to a place among the best satirical productions of the age. The characters are, in general, well selected and ably drawn, the illustrations are happy, the sentiments just, the imagery correct and various, and the satire at once easy, vivacious, and moral. The satirical poetry of dean Swift has various kinds and a high degree of poetic excellence ; but delicacy is by no means one of its attributes. His wit is often extremely happy, and his ridicule just, lively, and powerful. " His diction is cor- rect, his numbers smooth, and his rhj^mes exact. There seldom occurs a laboured expression, or a redundant epithet. All his verses exemplify his own definition of a good style ; they consist of proper ivorcb in proper places ^ But the levity Math which he frequently treats the most serious subjects is altogether unpardonable * ; and the * " I know not," says Dr. Beattie, " whether this author is not the only human being who ever presumed to speak in ludicrous terms of the last judgement. His profane verses on thattremen* dous subject were not published, so far as I know, till after his death : for Chesterfield's letter to Voltaire, in which they are in- serted, and spoken of with approbation (which is no more than one should expect from such a critic), and said to be copied from the original in Swift's hand-writing, is dated in 1752. But this is no excuse for the author. We can guess at what was in his rnind when ha wrote them ; and at w^hat remained in his mind while he could have desti'oyed them, and would not. I mean not to insinuate tl^at Swift was favourable to infidelity. There is good reason to believe he was not ; and that, though many of his levities are inexcusable, he could occasionally be both serious and pious. In fact, an infidel clergyman would be such a com- pound of execrable impiety, and contemptible meanness, that I gm unwilling to suppose there can be such a monster. The pro.* Sect. I V-] Satirical Foetry. 25 unnatural fondness which he manifests for coarse indelicacy, and for images drawn from every source of physical impurity, cannot but fill with disgust the mind of every virtuous reader *. The satires of Churchill display great vigour both of thought and language ; and though the boldness of their abuse, and the nature of their subjects, were, in some measure, the ground of their popularity, while the author lived ; yet they have certainly great strength, and possess no inconsiderable merit in their way. Vicious as was the character of the man, he knew how to ex- pose and correct vice. The Rosciad, and the Prophecy of Famine, may be regarded as the best of his poems. London, a poem in imitation of the third satire of Juvenal, by Dr. Johnson, was one of the early displa3"s of that genius which after- wards shone with such distinguished lustre, and filled so large a space in the literature of the age. The Faust, of the celebrated Goethe, of Germany, occupies a high place in the list of modern sati- rical writings. The Table Talk, the Progress of Err our, and some other satirical pieces, by Cow- per, in purity, humour, dignity, and force, have seldom been exceeded in any language. The Baviad and Mccviad of Mr. Gilford have receiv- ed much applause from some of the critics of faneness of this author I impute to his passion for ridicule, and rage of witticism ; which, when they settle into a habit, and ven- ture on liberties with what is sacred, never fail to pervert the mind, and harden the heart." * Instances of this fault are so numerous and offensive in Swift's writings, that no further remarks are necessary either to explain or enforce the criticism. 5<5 Poetry. [Cq^P- XX. Great Britain. To these may be added Tkc Pursuits of Literature, a satirical poem, publish- ed a few years ago, by an anonymous hand. In this "work every friend of truth, virtue, and sound learning will fmd much to approve and admire. A large portion of the literary and moral opinions which it contains are doubtless entitled to the ■\\armest approbation. But the judicious reader will also fmd much to condemn. The author dis- covers, on many occasions, a bitterness of preju- dice, and a rage for satire, which frequently lead liim astray, and which detract greatly both from the dignity and the value of his work. His pe- dantic fondness for quotation is indulged to a de- gree which disfigures his pages, and encumbers and weakens his meaning ; and, after all, his notes are so much more spirited and valuable than his poetry, that the latter ^vill seldom be read except as an introduction to the former *. Under the head of Satire falls that jnock-heroic poetry, which is a species of composition almost wJiolly peculiar to modern times, and of which the * The author of this singular work is still unknown. That he has great learning, and a comprehensive and vigorous mind, -cannot be doubted ; and that in prose he expresses himself with much force, vivacity, and taste, is no less evident. But I must be permitted, on many subjects, to call in question both the can- dour of his temper, and the rectitude of his judgement ; and as a poet, notwithstanding all the applause which has been heaped upon him, I must consider him far below the great masters among whom he affects to take his station, and with whom he has the presumption to compare himself. His work is one of those which derive their chief importance and popularity from the praise and aspersion of living characters with which they abound ; an4 which, in a few years, must fall into oblivion. ^ SLcT.^^^] Satirical Poetry. 27 last age has been abundantly prolific. Of this kind of poetry The Rape of the Lock, by Pope, is a specimen of first-rate excellence. In this work, novelty of imagery, fertility of invention, felicity of wit, and sweetness of versification, are combined in an exquisite degree. The Triumphs of Temper ^ by Mr. Haylcy, may be considered as belonging to the same class: and though far from being equal to the immortal production of Pope, it dis- plaj^s a degrfee of genius, taste, and humour, high- ly honourable to the author. The greater part of the poetry of a certain Bri- tish satirist, who calls himself Peter Pindar, also belongs to this class. His writings abound in hu- mour, which, though frequently gross, indicates talents of no common rank ; and in wit, which, though generally eccentric, and frequently de- voted to the worst purposes, manifests extent of learning and force of imagination. Aware that quaint phrases, whimsical allusions, and laughable conceits, when presented unmixed, will soon cease to please, he has taken care to infuse into many of his pieces a considerable portion of sentiment and tenderness, and sometimes to elevate his reader by an unexpected stroke of the sublime *. Since the days of Butler many specimens of that burlesque poetry adopted by him in his Hu- * The real name of this writer is Wolcot. While justice is done to his talents, which, in a certain line, are really great, his faults and vices ought ndt to pass without censure. His blasphe- mous impiety cannot be viewed by the Christian without abhor- rence; while the injustice and malignity displayed against pri- vate character, in many of his writings, must be regarded with cordial dcteetation by every honest man. 58 I'oetry. [CHA^i*. ^. dibras have been given to the public; but few of them are entitled to the praise of high excel- lence. Probably the most successful imitations of the Iludibrastic manner are to be found in the Alma of Prior, and the M'Fingal of Mr. Trum- bull, a respectable American poet. The merit of the former is so great, that Mr. Pope, with all his poetic fame, expressed a wish to have been the author of it; and the latter has been pronounced, by good judges, both in Europe and, America, to be nearly equal to its great model. M. Gressett, a French poet of high reputation, lias shown, in his Vert-Vert , and in his Chartreuse y that between the heroic and the burlesque there is still another species of poetry, partaking in some degree of the characters of both : a kind of com- position which, while it displays some of the attri- butes of moral and serious poetry, at the same time embraces the features of the satiric, the gay, and the refined comic, in a very pleasing degree. About fifty years belbre the commencement of the century under review began the fashion of imitating the great satirists of Rome, or adapting ancient poetry to modern characters and manners. This kind of poetical exercise has continued in rogue to the present day, and the number of those who have made trial of their genius in this way has greatly increased. Of this imitation the sa- tires of Horace, Juvenal, and Persius, have all been the objects. And among these imitators are found the names of Pope, Johnson, GifTord, Lewis^ and several other British poets. - 1 Sect. V.] Descriptive Poetry. m SECTION V„ DESCRIPTIVE POETRY. In Descriptive poetry the last age may lay claim to the character of distinguished excellence. It not only produced more in quantity, but also much af a superior quality to that of which any preceding period can boast. The tale of The Hermit, by Dr. Parnell, deserves high praise for justness of sentiment, and delicacy and liveliness of colouring. The Windsor Forest of Pope also belongs to the same class ; and for variety and ele- gance of description, and particularly for a happy interchange of the descriptive, the narrative, and the moral, possesses great merit. But the work entitled to the highest place in this department of ■poetry, is the Seasons, by Thomson*. This wri- ter may be said to have created a new species of poetry. " His mode of thinking and of express- ing his thoughts is original. His blank verse is not the blank verse of Milton, or of any preceding poet. His numbers, his pauses, his diction, are of his own growth, without transcription, without imitation. He thinks in a peculiar strain ; and he thinks always as a man of genius. He looks round on nature and life with the eye which nature be- * James Thomson was born in 1700,. and received his educa- tion at the university of Edinburgh. His Winter was published about the year 1726; \\\s Summer '\\\ 1727; his Spring \n 1728.; and \m Autumn in 1730. This ilkistrious poet died ija 1748. 30 Poetry. [Chai^. XX. stows only on a poet ; the eye that distinguishes in every thing presented to its view, M^hatever there is on which imagination can delight to be detained ; and with a mind that at once compre- hends the vast, and attends to the minute. He leads us through the appearances of things as they are successively varied by the vicissitudes of the year ; and imparts to us so much of his own en- thusiasm, that our thoughts expand with his ima- gery, and kindle with his sentiments *." Kleist, of Germany, in the same department of poetic composition, has been compared with Thomson, and is said, by some of his countrymen, to have attained nearly equal excellence. His Fj'uhling exhibits some of the most charming scenes in nature, in just, vivid, and beautiful co- lours. A similar comparison has also been made between the immortal British bard and Delille of France, who, in his L' Homme des Cliamps, or Ru^ ral Philosopher, presented his countrymen with a poem of acknowledged merit. Tliough in this work, as well as in that which was before men- tioned by the same author, there is but little dis- play of invention ; yet, for correctness and ele- gance of versification, it sustains a very high character. The Alpen of baron Haller is a de- scriptive poem of much merit. To which may be added t\iQectfully cherished as long as religion, viitue;, ajid taste, txist^ Sect. VII.] Lyric Foetry. 35 city, and the general poetic excellence, for whicli the author is remarkable. In pastoral song and ballad, the poets of the last age incontestably excelled those of all preceding centuries. In this class of poetic compositions Great Britain has been particularly fruitful ; and few names deserve to be mentioned with so much honour as that of Robert Burns, who was noticed in a former section. In the happy union of ease, simplicity, humour, pathos, and energy, he has j|iad (ew equals in any age. • SECTION VII. LYRIC POETRY. The last age produced some specimens of lyric poetry which deserve the highest praise. It has been asserted indeed, that, in this species of com- position, modern poets are universally and indis- putably inferior to the ancient ; but this assertion is made too hastily, and without sufficient qualifi- cation. Some of the odes of Collins and of Gray will bear an honourable comparison with the best productions of this kind oif any age. Beside these, the lyric compositions of Watts, Thomson, Lyttle- ton. Mason, Warton, Cowper, Mrs. Barbauld, Coleridge, and several other English poets, will long do honour to the literature of their country. During the same period, much lyric poetry of a rospectable character was produced on the con- tinent of Europe. In the French language, the D 2 1 ./ [Chap. XX S6 Poetry. ■ odes of J. B. Rousseau, and of Gicssett, are con- sidered by the critics of tliat country as among the most fmished productions of their kind. To the odes of Rousseau this character is especially- applicable. In the Italian language, the odes of Metastasio * ; in the German, those of Klopstock, Weisse, and Wieland ; and in the Swedish, those of Dahlin, and of Gyllenborg, are all admired among those who understand the languages in wliich they are respectively written. But it is be- liev«d that the best lyric poetry of Great Britain, during this period, exceeds that of any other coun- try in Europe, and of course in the literary world. Under the head of lyric poetry may be placed the species of composition called the Sonnet, with many excellent models of which the eighteenth century has remarkably abounded. This kind of poetry is of Italian origin. Dante, though not the inventor, was the hrst who succeeded in the com- position of it. The hrst successful attempts to present the Sonnet in our language were made by Drummond, and afterward by Milton. The former excelled in delicacy ; the specimens fur- nished by the latter were chiefly distinguished by strength of expression, and sublimity of thought, but were by no means remarkable for smoothness, harmony, or elegance. In these respects, several writers of Sonnets, since the day of that immortal bard, though greatly inferior in genius, have much excelled him , and of course have produced * Pietro Metastasio was born at Rome, of poor parents, in 1678. His poems procured hita the gift of nobility. He 4i«d sA Vienna in 178^?. Sect. VII.] Lyric Poet ri/. 37 compositions of this kind before unequalled in En- glish literature. Among those who have most distinguished themselves in this department of poetry are Charlotte Smith, Mr. Bowles, and miss SeAvard. *' In sweetness and harmony of versification, in unaffected elegance of style, and in that pleasing melancholy which irresistibly steals upon and captivates the heart, they have excelled all other writers of the Sonnet, and have shown how erroneous are the opinions of those who deem this species of composition beneath the attention of genius *, " Finally, under the general denomination of lyric poetry fall those various species of poetic compositions called Sovgs, Ballads, &c., of which the last age has been eminently fruitful. Never • was there a period before in which the number and the poetic merit of these were so great as during that which is under review. In this de^ partment of poetry the Scotch and English have excelled not only their contemporaries, but all preceding writers. But this class of poets is so numerous, and so familiarly known, that no at- tempt will be made to exhibit even a selection of the best. * Drake's Literary Hours, vol. i, p. 1 13. 38 Poetry. [Chap. XX. SECTION VIII. ELEGIAC POETRY. That part of the poetry of the eighteenth cen- tury which falls under this head is worthy of par- ticular notice. It may be pronounced greatly superior to all the productions of a similar kind which belong to any preceding age. In this sec- tion several of the productions of Pope may be with propriety arranged, and must have assigned to them a high place. The elegies of Hammond, though scarcely possessing first-rate excellence, have been also celebrated. But the writer who confessedly stands in the first rank of elegiac poets is Gray. His Elegy 171 a Countni Churchyard will be read with admiration and delight, as pos- fieSsing beauties of the most rich and exquisite kind, as long as taste and sensibility shall exist *. * Thoi-nSs Gray was born in London in 1716, and died in 1771. His character, as drawn by a friend, is as follows : " Pep- haps he Avas the most learned rnan in Europe. He was equally acquainted with the elegant and the profound parts of science; and that not superficially, but thoroughly. He knew every branch of history, both natural and civil ; had read all the origi- nal historians of England, France, and Italy ; and w as a great antiquarian. Criticism, metaphysics, morals, politics, made a principal part of his study. Voyages and travels of all sorts were his favourite amusements; and he had a fine taste in painting, prints, ajchitecture, and gardening. With such a fund of know- ledge, nis conversation must have been equally instructing and entertaining ; but he was also a good man, a man of virtue and ^ECT. VIII.] Elegiac Poetry. 30 Another distinguished name, entitled to an lio- nourable place in this list, is that of Shcn stone *, who produced at least one Elegy which will ever command admiration. Nor would it be just to pass in silence the name of miss Seward, who, in this department of poetry, has displayed powers in the pathetic, the elegant, and the beautiful, which bid fair long to render her character conspicuous in the annals of English literature. The best elegiac poetry of the last age is di- stinguished above that of all preceding periods, by the union of a number of qualities which never before so conspicuously met in this species of composition. These qualities are regularity, cor- rectness, pathos, elevation of sentiment, g:nd pu- humanity." Dr. Johnson, in his Lives of the Poets, is generally eupposed not to have done justice to this celebrated Avriter. From his Ele^rj/ in the Churchyard, indeed, that great critic could not withhold the warmest praise. " In the character of this Elegy," says he, " I rejoice to concur with the common reader. It ^bounds with images which find a mirror in every mind, and with sentiments to which every bosom returns an echo. Had Gray wrilteji often thus, it had been vain to blame, and useless to praise him." After all, it must be acknowledged that he wrote but little J that only a part of that little is in the style of exquisite excellence ; and that his Elegy is so greatly superior to every other production of his pen, as to excite a suspicion that it wis the result of unwearied polish and elaboration, rather than the spontaneous effusion of a mighty genius. If this view of the sub- ject be admissible, though Gray will still hold a place in the first rank of lyric and elegiac poets; yet some of the praise which has been bestowed on his genius will be pronounced excessive, and the judgement of T>t. Johnson less liable to exception than is commonly supposed. * William Shenstone was born in Shropshire in 17 li, and idled unmanied in 17G3. His works were afterwards collected .md published in 3 vols. 8vo, 40 Poetnj. [Chap. XX. rity of moral character. Nevei' before were these characters go frequently assembled, so harmoni- ously united, or so forcibly exhibited, as in some of the elegiac productions of the century under review. SECTION IX. DRAMA. Tlie Dramatic Poetry of the eighteenth century bears, in several respects, a distinguished charac- ter *. An obvious circumstance, which deserves to be noted, is the great and unprecedented num- ber of dramatic productions that have appeared during this period. In almost every civilised and literary nation the press has teemed with the ef- forts of the tragic and comic muses. Perhaps in no department of literature, if we except Novels, has the taste of the age for multiplying books been more remarkably displayed than in that which is under consideration. In proportion as theatrical amusements have been multiplied and extended, the love of fame, the hope of profit, or a fondness for the employment, have prompted many to appear as candidates for supplying the demands of the public. Of the moral effect of * The author is sensible that many dramatic productions can- not with propriety be denominated jsoe^^c; but, to avoid multir plying chapters, he has thought proper to throw under one head all those works, >vhether poetic or not, which belong to the dra- matic class. Sect. IX.] Drama. 41 this increase in the taste and demand for theatri- cal representations some notice will be taken here- after^ Though the specimens of KngUsJi Tragedy^ which belong to the period under review, are nu- merous, yet few of them are entitled to the praise of first-rate excellence. After the Mourning Bride of Congreve, which properly belongs to the pre- ceding age, the Fair Penitent^ and the Jane Shore, of Rowe *, with respect to time, hold the first place. These, though of different relative merit, yet, both on account of their plot and language, have deservedly continued to be favourites to the present day f . If Rowe paint the passions with less force and conformity to nature than Shak- speare and Otway, he is free from the barbarisms of the former, and the licentiousness of the latter. The Cafo of Addison is generally known ; and the public seem now to be agreed in the opinion, that, notwithstanding all the loftiness of sentiment and beauty of diction with which it abounds, as a * Nicholas Rowe was born in Bedfordshire in 1673. He held peveral places under government, and upon the accession of George I was made poet-laureat. He died in 1718. His best productions are his translation o( Lucarii and the two Tragedies abovementioned. -j- In these and the following remarks on dramatic poetry, the author takes for granted, that no reader w ill consider him as ex- pressing an opinion favourable to theatrical amusements. He is persuaded, that the general character and tendency of such amuse- inents are highly immoral; but in this place, and always when he employs favourable expressions concerning certain dramas, he begs to be understood as merely delivering opinions of a literary- kind. 4i2 Poetry. [Chap. XX. tragedy it is too " regularly dull," and unnatu- rally stiff, for scenic representation. The Revenge , by Dr. Young, displays no small share of that sub- limity and fn-e Vv liich the illustrious author so re- markably possessed. Of his several tragedies, this only keeps possession of the stage. The Gamester of Moore will long remain a very ho- nourable monument of the dramatic powers of its author. The Elf rid a and Caractacus of Mason * would have done credit to the most favourable periods of ancient literature. Douglas, by Mr. Home, for several reasons attracted an unusual degree of public attention, when it first appeared ; and has ever since maintained a high character f. Among the tragedies of Thomson Tancred and Sigismunda alone merits distinction. This, with regard to plot, sentiment, and style, is entitled to high respect; but perhaps scarcely to that de- gree which might ha\ e been expected from the great powers displa^X'd in the Seasons. The Irene of Dr. Johnson, though it " furnishes a rich store of noble sentiments, fine imagery, and beautiful language, is deficient in plan, pathos, and general * The reverend "Wijliam Mason was a native of Yorkshire. He publislied his first poem in 1748, took orders in \lb^, and died in 1797. f Mr. Home waa a clergyman of the church of Scotland. The circumstance of a person of his profession giving encouragement to the stage, by writing for it, gave great and just oftence, and made his tragedy an object of much more attention and interest ihan it would otherwise have been. I^e wrote several tragedies afterward ; but they were all unsuccessful. It seemed as if his genius had been absorbed by his first production. Sect. IX.] Drama. 4^ impression." The Mysterious Motlier of Horace Walpole*, though the subject is shocking, dis- plays great talents, especially in depicting the terrible. Miss Hannah More's Percy is a popu- lar tragic production f- Her Fatal Falsehood also indicates those talents which appear in most of her writings. Her Sacred Dramas, though a monument of her piety, and her desire to promote youthful improvement, will scarcely be thought to deserve high praise as works of genius. To these may be added the Zenobia^ the Grecian Daughter, and the Alzuma, of Mr. Murphy, which are considered as respectable in their dra- matic character, and pure in their moral tenclenr cy, but with a remarkable prevalence of terrour in their impression. The close of the century was distinguished by the dramatic publications of miss Joanna Baillie, who is considered by many as having retrieved the declining character of the age with respect to tragic composition. A respectable critic has pro- nounced, that, " for lofty poetry, sublime senti- ment, and true pathos, her tragedies stand unque- stionably at the head of every modern eifort of the tragic muse." In the history of English Comedy, the eighteenth ccntuiy forms an important era. Indeed, the £% * Horace Wulpole, the youngest son of sir Robert Walpole, was bom in 1717. He succeeded to the title and estat* of the eitii a c^flefbrated French tragedian." Notwith- standing this <::iharge, however, it has maintained a high degree of popularity. 44 Poetry . [Chap, XX. glish language scarcely furnished an instance of pure or unmixed comedy prior to the commence- ment of this period. The comic productions of Shakspeare are well known not to have been of this kind; and those of Dryden and Southern were generally interspersed with too much of the tragic to have a place assigned them in the department of ridicule alone. In the last age a remarkable revolution has taken place in this respect. Spe- cimens of unmixed comedy have become frequent, or rather the most fashionable kind of dramatic Morton, Reynolds, and several others, are well known to those v/ho have a tolerable acquaintance Sect. IX.] DramQ. 47 with the English drama, and have attained variou^j degrees of respect in the public estimation. That kind of dramatic composition which is set to music, and is denominated an Opera^ is well known to be a modern invention. This species of theatrical exhibition was first made in Italy about the beginning of the seventeenth century ; but it was never introduced into England till the begin- ning of the eighteenth : and in order to avoid the absurdity of dramas in an unknown tongue (for the iirst operas performed in Britain were in the Italian language), Mr. Addison wrote and pub- lished his Rosamond. Since that time operas have become more popular in almost every part of Europe, and genetally find a place where the theatre is supporte:till far from having done justice to his under- taking. The next in this list of critical editors is ?Lr Thomas Hanmer, whose edition appeared in, 1744. He made many emendations with great judgement, and in a manner which indicated both discernment ^nd erudition ; but in others he dis- covered much caprice; and adopted a large num- ber of the censurable innovations of Pope. In 1747 Dr.Warburton made trial of his great criti- cal acumen, and his profound erudition, on the works of the same illustrious dramatist; but though ike displayed much sagacity and learning, his work Sect. IX.] Drama. 49 was considered rather as an exhibition of himself than an elucidation of his author. In 1765 ap- peared the edition of Dr. Johnson. This great critic threw more light on Shakspeare than all who had gone before him. His preface to the edition, his numerous emendations, and his notes on obscure passages, discover a soundness of judgement, a profundity of critical skill, and an elegance of taste, "which will do him lasting ho- nour. The editorial labours of Mr. Malonc close the list. His edition appeared in 1789. Having devoted much time and pains to the work, and having the advantage of all that had been done by his predecessors, he may be considered, on the whole, the most complete commentator on Shak- speare that has hitherto appeared. Ihe dramatic productions of /"/-^wce, during the period under consideration, were numerous ; and jsome of them attained, and still hold, a liigh repu- tation *. The first class of French Tragedies be- longing to this age may be siighty noticed. In this list the iirst place is due to the several tragic productions of Voltaire. The Zaire, the Alzire, the Merope, and the Orphan of China, by him, are all possessed of distinguished excellence. It is peculiarly worthy of remark, that notwithstand- ing that celebrated infidel, in almost every page of his prose writings, discloses his hatred of reli- gion, and the profligacy of his principles, nothing can be more pure, in a moral and religious view, than his tragedies. Next to those of Voltaire are the tragic compositions of the elder Crebillon, * Sc^ la Harpe's Lectures, and his Literari/ Correspondence. 50 Poelry. [ChaP. XX. which are universally allowed to display great powers, and especially to excel in force of charac- ter. His Rhadamistus and Atreus are always quoted as his best performances. The tragedies of la Motte have also a place assigned them among the great dramatic productions of France during the last age. Of his several works, the Ines de Castro holds the highest rank. The historical and patriotic tragedies of Dubelloy are much ce- lebrated in the annals of French literature. His Siege of Calais attained the greatest degree of celebrity ; and afterwards his Titus and Zelmij^a commanded considerable attention. The trage- , dies of M. Saurin are also honourably mentioned among the critics of the author's own country. Of these, to his Spartacus the most liberal praise has been given. M. Diderot, among the nume- rous productions of his pen, gave to tlie public several tragedies ; but they are, like many of his other writings, more conspicuous monuments of his moral depravity than of his genius or taste. The French Comedies which have attracted at- tention are much more nimierous. The comic productions of le Sage rank high in this list. His Tuscaret gained great and general popularity. Le Glorieii.r, and Le Philosophe Marie, of Des- touches, were still more eminently popular. The former, indeed, has been pronounced one of the best comedies that the age produced. Piron was also a comic writer of great celebrity among his countrymen, and even throughout Europe. His Aletromanie is an effort of high dramatic ge- nius ; but is liable to exception with respect to its moral tendency. The younger Crebillon dis- Sect. IX.] Drama. Jl plays, in his comedies, a large portion of wit and humour, but they are too much of the licentious kind. M. Saurin is also distinguished as a writer of French comedy. His Anglomane is considered as the best production of his pen, in this depart- ment of dramatic writing. The comedies of M. Gressett sustain a still higher character. The Mechant, by him, ranks with the first comic works of the age. M. Boissy has displayed con- siderable talents as a WTiter of comedy. UHojinne du JouTy and Les dehors Trompeurs, hold a respect- able place in the critic's list. M. Beaumarchais is also entitled to notice as belonging to the same class. Though little can be said in favour of the moral tendency of his Barhier de Seville, Mariage de Figaro, and Mere Coiipable* ; yet they discover so much wit and humour as to command much of the public attention. To France is ascribed the invention of a new species of drama, called C ome die Lar may ante, or Crying Comedy. This is a genus between tragedy and comedy of the pure unmixed kind ; and also different in its character from the tragi-comedy of Dryden and Southern. It offers pictures of tem- porary domestic distresses, which in private life too frequently occur, and which, though attended with no consequences sufficiently fatal for tragedy, are too serious for comic representation. The inventor of this species of drama was M. Ja Chaussee. In this style of writing he has had se- ♦ These three plays of Beaumarchais form one story ; and in the last the crimes and follies of the charJ^cters are represented as punished. E 2 52 ' Poetry. [CHAP.XX. veral imitators. The domestic and sentimental comedies of M. Dorat are considerably celebrat- ed ; and the moral dramas of Monval and Bouilly have also a high reputation. Beside the French comic writers above men- tioned, several others have attained distinction, though in an inferior degree. Among these, Re- gnard, la Motte, Marivaux, Marmontel, Sedaine, and Saint Foix, deserve particular notice. It is to be lamented tliat purity of moral character cannot be always ascribed to their productions. Though the best English comedies of the eigh- teenth century are far superior to those of the same language which were produced in the pre- ceding age, we cannot consider the same improve- ment as belonging to modern French comedy. Molicre, who died towards the close of the seven- teenth century, in the combined excellences of wit, humour, plot, and character, has never been equalled by any of his successors. It may be questioned, indeed, whether he was ever equalled, in all these respects, by any writer, ancient or modern. His plays have supplied materials for plunder to all other comic writers since his time. The dramatic works of Ttahjy during the jieriod ©f this retrospect, were many in number, and some of them highly valued as efforts of genius *. la. Italian Tragedy, the various works of Martelli, which appeared early in the century, hold an honourable place. His Perselide, Ifigenia, and Alceste, are generally enumerated among the best productions of his pen. To Martelli is ascribed * Se»\Ys.\kcr'sHiittorical Memoir omitalian Tragedy, 4to, 1799. Sect. IX.] Drama. 5$ the honour of having adoped astmcture of poetry which had never before been used in Italy. The tragedies of Marchesi have also a high character among the critics of that country. Those under the titles of Crispo and PoUssena have particularly attained general celebrity. The Merope of Maf- fei is pronounced by some the best tragedy that , was ever written. It is certain that few tragic productions have been more famed, or have served more frequently as models to subsequent writers*. Granelli and Bettinelli have also a place among the distinguished authors in this species of com- position. The Sedecia, Manasse, and Dione, of the former ; and the Glonata, Demetrio, and Ser'sCy of the latter, are considered as their ablest prO' ductions. Monti, of the same country, has ob- tained considerable distinction by his Manfredi and Aristodemo. To these names may be added those of Ccesarotti and Alfieri, who have both pro- duced tragedies of high reputation \ and that of Metastasio, whose Operas and Sacred Dramas have been long and advantageously known to the public. He perfected the musical and serious drama of Italy. Rejecting marvellous incidents, and allegorical personages, his productions be- came more conformable to nature and life than those of his predecessors ; and the music of his pieces was so introduced as to be performed by real actors, strongly agitated with passion, anil of course giving more elTect to their performance than could be done in the chorus of Greek tra- * The Merope of MafFei is said to have been the model of Voltaire's tragedy of that name. It is asserted, also, that the worly of Maffei is the real parent of Home's Douglas. 5i Poetry. [Chap. XX. gedj, which was usually executed by calm ob- servers instead of those who participated in the action of the scene. Of the Italian writers of Comedy the author knows too little to attempt any distinct account. Few, if any, among them are more celebrated than Goldoni, the most voluminous dramatic writer of the eighteenth century. A large portion of the pieces exhibited on the Italian stage are from his pen. His comedies are so numerous that it would be difficult to make a selection, and of such ac- knowledged merit that they need no additional encomium *. The dramatic writings of Germany first began in the eighteenth century to assume a respectable and interesting aspect. Indeed, till within the last forty years scarcely any thing had been pro- duced, in this department of composition, which could be considered as doing honour to German genius, or which was much knoWn beyond the bounds of that empire. But within this period some writers of high reputation have appeared, and raised the dramatic character of their country to great eminence. Goethe stands among the most celebrated Ger- man dramatists. His Sisters^ his Stella, and his Jphigeiiia, are considered as very honourable mo- * Charles Goldoni was born at Venice in 1707, and died at Paris in 1792. He is said to have been equal to the greatest co- mic poets of modern times in dramatic talents, and superior to theni all in the fertility of his genius. His works were printed at Leghorn in 1791, in 31 volumes 8vo. He has been generally called the Moliere of Italy ; and Voltaire, in one of his letters t« the marquis Albergati^ styles him " the painter of Nature.'' Sect. IX.J Drama. 55 niiments of genius. The tragedies of Lcssing have a high character among his countrymen, parti- cularly his Emilia Galotti, Philotas^ and Sarah Sampso7i. The tragic productions of Babo are also much distinguished. The most remarkable of these are Otto of JFiltksbach, Dagobert, and Conscience. But perhaps no tragic writer of Germany has gained a reputation more extensive and commanding than Schiller, whose Robbers and Don Carlos evince powerful talents, and have gained unusual popularity. Beside these, Schle- gel, Weisse, Leisewitz, von Reitzenstein, and Gerstenberg, have produced tragedies of high re- putation. The tragedies of Klopstock are also represented as models of sublimity, in senti- ment, language, and action. In comedy, Cruger, iKhnger, Wetzel, Grossmann, Schroeder, Engel, and Iffland, are spoken of as having merit of a very conspicuous and popular kind. The last, in particular, is one of the most liberal contri- butors to the drama of modern times. Towards the close of the century, no dramatic writer in the German language was so generally popular as Kotzebue, whose principal works are so generally known, that an attempt to enumerate them, or draw their character, is altogether unnecessary^, * Several of the dramas of Kotzebue, as well as those of Schil- ler, Goethe, and some other Germaa writers, have been the sub- ject of much criticism with respect to their moral tendency. It is impossible, in this place, to enter into a discussion of the me- rits of this inquiry. It isprobable, however, that every sober and reflecting mind will perceive much to censure on this ground, particularly in the writings of the three popular dramatists above mentioned. It is not objected to these writers, that their charac» o6 Poetry, [CiiAP. XX The dramatic writers of the rest of Europe, du- ring the age under consideration, were few ; and of these few only a small portion gained any consi- derable celebrity. With the dramatists of Spain and Portugal the author has no acquaintance. In Sweden, the dramati<; w^orks ofDahlin, Gyllen- borg, and Kellgren ; in Denmark, those of baron Holberg*; and in Russia, those of Somorokof, are among the most conspicuous and esteemed. The character of tiie drama in America, towards the close of the eighteenth century, began to be more distinct and national than at any former period. Instead of waiting altogether for the pro- ductions of the English stage, and continuing to be its servile echo, the American stage has exhi- ters are, in general, unnaturally drawn, but that such characters ought never to have been e^ihibited at all ; not that their inci- dents are impossible or incredible, but that such incidents, whe- ther in fiction or in real life, have always been powerful means of corrupting the principles and undermining the virtue of those by whom they were frequently contemplated. * Baron Holberg was one of the most extraordinary characters of the age. He was born in Norway, towards the close of the seventeenth century; was the son of a private soldier, and learned to read without the help of a master. Being deprived of his father at nine years of age, he persisted in pursuing his studies, travelled from school to school, and beg2;ed his learning and his bread. Early in life he made the tour of Europe on foot, and came over to England, v.here he resided two years at the univer- sity of Oxford. ^ Furnished with a large portion of the learning of Europe, he at length settled at Copenhagen, v.here his nume- rous writings gained him much public notice and liberal favours from the government. He composed eighteen comedies. Those in his own language are said to excel j and those which have been translated into Fi ench are represented as having great merit. He died about the year 1754'. — Goldsmith's Inquiry into the pre- icni State of Polite Learning. Sect. IX.] Drama. 57' bited a considerable number of original pieces, and others adopted from the French and German. And though the former are not equal to the first class of British productions, and the moral ten- dency of some of the latter has been questioned ; yet they form one stop in that literary progress of the country, which is more particularly detailed in another place. There are several characteristic features which belong to the dramatic compositions of the eigh- teenth century, in which they differ from those of any preceding age. It may be proper to take some notice of a few of these features before bring- ing this section to a close. One circumstance in which modern dramas dif- fer from those of former times is, that they arc more consistent and correct in the structure of their fable. If they do not surpass or equal some pre- ceding productions of this class in genius, they must be allowed to excel in taste and regularity of plan. Many of the noblest of the dramas which were given to the world before the eighteenth century, violated every principle of probability and nature. They departed from the most obvious unities of time,, place, and action. They gave to one country the customs, laws, and general characters of another ^ and thus, amid splendid excellences, abounded with manifest absurdities ; and while they grati- fied the taste, also put to a severe test the pati- ence of the critic. Vv^ith most of these faults, even the immortal Shakspeare is chargeable. The best dramatists of the eighteenth century may be said, ia general, to adhere more closely to proba- 58 Poetrtj. [Chap. XX. bility and nature ; to employ a fable more cor- rect and consistent, and less frequently to ofFend against the just laws of fiction. A further circumstance in which the dramatic compositions of the last age differ from those of former times is, that they abound more in plot and action. The great excellence of Shakspearc is not the artful contrivance of his storv, nor the variety and interest of his incidents. Were his plays tried upon ground of this sort, they would doubtless be found inferior to man}^ of smaller name. But his distinguishing merit consists in his knowledge of human nature, in the accurate delineation of his characters, in forcible and na- tural descriptions, and in the weight and subli- mity both of his sentiments and his language. These, notVv'ithstanding numerous defects in the structure of his dramas, deepl}'^ impress the mind, dwe-ll upon the memory, and secure to him a fame unrivalled and immortal. Some of the remarks which have been made on Shakspearc, particu^ larly that which relates to his frequent deficiency in propriety of plot and incident, may be consi- dered as applying to almost all the dramatic writers w ho went before him. Those of the last age, especially the first class, generally adopted a different method. A more artful contrivance of fable is beeome fashionable ; a more extensive and intricate plot is attempted ; more intrigue and action are carried on ; our curiosity is more awakened; and more interesting situations arise. This is said, by good critics, to be an improve- ment. It is contended that it furnishes a more Sect. IX.] Drama. 59 favourable field for the display of passion, and that it renders the entertainment both more animated and more instructive *. It may also be mentioned as a peculiarity in the dramatic writings of the eighteenth century, that they are in general more decent, and more moral in their tendency, than those of the age immedi- ately preceding. The comedies of Vanbrugh, so justly admired for their humour and native ease of dialogue, are extremely licentious ; and in the greater part of .Congrev^e's dramas, amidst the brilliancy of wit and force of language which so remarkably characterise them, there are passages which put virtue and decorum entirely out of countenance. In several of the comedies of Dry- den the indecency is so palpable and shocking, that we are told, even in the dissolute age in which he lived they were prohibited from being brought on the stage. It is but justice to say, that in the course of the last age a more correct taste has arisen and prevailed. It is true, that, in some of the most popular dramatic produc- tions of this period, indelicate scenes occur, and the general moral tendency of many is highly censurable. But there has doubtless been, for a number of years past, a decency in the public taste, and in that of authors, which has revolted from open and gross obscenity, and of course given the dramatic publications of the day a great superiority, in a moral view, over those w4iich were fashionable in the time of Otway, Congreve, yanbrugh, and Dryden. Among the hrst, who * Blair's Lectures. 60 Toetnj. [Chap. XX. signalised themselves by discarding grossly sen- sual descriptions and indecent expressions from English Tragedy, were Mr. Rowe and Mr. Addi- son ; and the like service was rendered to Comedy by sir Richard Steele, and some who immediately succeeded him. But though the dramatic productions of the eighteenth century are in general more decent^ and much less offensive in the exhibition of coarse, licentiousness, many of them may be charged with a fault, which, though less obvious, is perhaps more mischievous in its tendency. This is, the artful interweaving of false principles in religion and morals with the whole structure of their fable and sentiments. Theatrical exhibitions, as well as Novels, have been employed to insinuate the poison of corrupt opinions, decorated and con- cealed, into unsuspecting minds. A splendid hero is made to inculcate and recommend the most hateful principles ; and an ingeniously contrived series of incidents to prepossess the mind in favour of vice. This, considered as a system deliberately instituted for the purpose of operating on public opinion, it is believed is peculiar to the eighteenth century. Both Great Britain and France have given birth to a few dramatic productions formed on this plan ; but they have still niore abounded in Germanyv Another peculiarit}^ of modern dramatic pro- ductions, especially of the tragic kind, is, that they abound more in love than the ancient mo- dels. In the ancient tragedies this subject was rarely mentioned or alluded to : still more seldom did any of them turn upon it. On the contrary. Chap. XX.] Poelrij. 61 love is the " main hinge of modern tragedy;" and where this is not the case, the introduction of the subject is considered as in some measure indispen- sable. This fact may be accounted for in several ways ; but perhaps the most probable reasons to be assigned for it are the two following. The progress of civilisation, by increasing the impor- tance of the female sex, has rendered every thing which concerns them, and particularly the passion of love, with its consequences, a more prominent object in society. The appearance of female per- formers on the stage, which is a modern improve- ment in the system of theatrical exhibition, pro- bably also contributed to produce the same eifect. But, whatever may have been the cause, the fact is undeniably true. The unseasonable introduc- tion of love-scenes into the Cato of Addison is well knovv'n to diminish the consistency and dig- iiity of that celebrated tragedy. The same may be said of many other popular pieces. Still it must be acknowledged that some modern dramas of great excellence and popularity have been formed without recurring to the aid of this pow- erful passion. Of this, Home's Douglas and Vol- taire's Merope are illustrious examples. But such instances are certainly rare. In recounting the remarkable poetical publi- cations of the age, it would be improper to pass without notice two singular events, \\hich have proved the sources of long-continued and violent controversies in the literary world, and concern- 6^ Poeby. [Chap. XX. ing which much diversity of opinion exists to the present day. The events alhided to are the pub- lication of the poems of Chatterton, an extraor- dinary youth of Bristol; and the collection and exhibition, in a regular form, of the works of Os- sian, by Mr. James Macpherson, a man who, by the connexiofi of his name with these poems alone, has attained [high celebrity in the republic of let- ters. In 1760 Mr. James Macpherson, of North Bri- tain, surprised the world by the publication of " Frag77ie7its of Ancient Poetry, collected in the Highlands of Scotland, and translated from the Gaelic or Erse language." In 1762 he published " Fin gal, an Epic Poem, in six books, together- with several other Poems composed by Ossian, the Son of Fingal;" and again in 1763 he produced " Teniora, an ancient Epic Poem, in eight books," with several additional poems. These were all ascribed to Ossian, an ancient Scottish bard*, and were declared by the publisher to have been col- lected, partly from old manuscripts, and partly from oral tradition. Few of the literary controversies of the age ex- cited more attention than that which immediately arose respecting the authenticity of these poems. By many learned men their antiquity was readily admitted; aiid their reception, particularly on the continent of Europe, was extremely favourable. There were not wanting enthusiastic admirers. * This poet is said, by those •\vho believe in the authenticity of the poems in question, to have flourished about the end of the second and the beginning of the third century. Chap. XX.] Poeh-y. 63 who even placed Ossian on the same shelf with Homer and Virgil ; who dwelt with rapturous" praise on his stupendous merits ; and made the most profuse acknowledgements to the man, who was supposed to have brought to light such pre- cious remains of ancient genius*. On the con^ trary, many judges equally learned and acute have denied the authenticity of the poems ascribed to Ossian, and have insisted that they are forge- ries by Mr. Macpherson himself f. Though this controversy is far from being terminated, yet the best supported and most probable opinion seems to be, that the poems in dispute are neither whojly the work of any ancient bard, nor entirely forged by Macpherson ; but that the latter really made large collections of ancient Gaelic poetry, which he modified and connected in his own way, mak- ing additions with freedom where he thought pro- per, and forming an apparently regular work of fragments which were never before united J. * Among the distinguished characters who have contended for the authenticity of Ossian's poems may be mentioned Dr. Blair, lord Karnes, Dr. Henry, Mr. Whitaker, and on the continent of Europe a large number. f Dr. Johnson not only utterly denied the authenticity of these poems, but also maintained that they had no merit. His opinion on the former point may, with some qualification, be admitted; but on the character of the work, it is difficult to suppose that so acute and profound a critic could deliver such an unfavourable judgement, without improper bias. Though the poetry of Ossian has been extravagantly estimated, it is surely worthy of much praise. I On the one hand, it is by no means credible that a man of Macpherson's mediocrity of talents could be himseJf the aulhor of the poems which bear the name of Ossian ; nor can it be sup- posed that any one, however great his powers, coiUd compkteli/ 64 Poetry. [Chap. XX, But whatever may be the origin of the poems which have passed under the name ofOssian, they doubtless possess merit of a wonderful kind. Amidst the obscurity which remarkably pervades them, and the frequent, and even disgusting, re- currence of the same images, such as the extend- ed heath by the seashore ; the mountain covered with mist; the torrent rushing through a solitary valley ; the scattered oaks ; the tombs of the war- riors overgrown with moss ; and the melancholy notes resounding from the hall of shells ; still these celebrated productions abound with rich beauties; with energy of- style, force of description, pathos, tenderness, and in some instances with sublimity of the highest order. In 1777 were published " Poems supposed to have been written at Bristol, by Thomas Rowley, and others, in the fifteenth Century." These poems were first brought to light by Thomas Chatterton, a youth of humble origin, and small advantages of education *, who professed to be forge compositions bearing so many marks of antiquitj', both in the style, the sentiments, and the historical facts. On the othei* hand, it is no less difficult to believe that manuscript copies of these poems, in the form in vrhich we now see them, should have existed from very remote antiquity. * Thomas Chatterton Mas born in the cit}^ of Bristol, Novem- ber 20th, 1752; His father was the master of a free school in that city, and was too poor to ^ive his son any of the advantages of a liberal education. His acquirements, therefore, were chiefly made up of such an acquaintance with English literature as a niiiKi of wonderful force, ardour, and ambition might be expected to gain under the constant pressure of poverty and other difficulties, and in the short space of less than eighteen years. He begai^ to \Vrite poetry about the eleventh year of his age ; and was but 4 Chap. XX.] Poetry. 6S only the transcriber, and declared that they were written by Rowley, a clergyman of Bristol, more than three centuries before their discovery by him. They consist chiefly of dramatic, lyric, and pasto- ral pieces, and are pronounced by some persons of distinction in the literary world to be the real works of Rowley, to whom they were attributed ; while a greater number of equal discernment and acquaintance with the subject have decided that they are forgeries, and that Chatterton himself was the author *. After much learned, ingenious. little more than sixteen when he produced the celebrated poems ascribed to Rowley. These he constantly affirmed he had co-> pied from manuscripts found in an old church in his native city ; but he never could be persuaded to produce any of the originals, except a few fi-agments, which he asserted were among the number, the largest of which was not more than eight inches long, and four or five Avide. Though the more general and pro- bable opinion at present is, tiiat this remarkable youth was the real author of the poems which have passed under Rowley's name ; yet some other works, certainly known to liive been pro- duced by him, place him high in the ranks of genius. Some of his elegies and satires, in patticular, unquestionably display great talents. He died miserably in London, August 25, 1770. His death is ascribed to poison, which he had swallowed in a fit of criminal impatience and overwhelming despair, with the design tp teruiinate his sufferings. He is said to have imbibed (in the two or three last years of his life) principles of the most licentious kind, and to have been very immoral in his practice. His mind was aspiring and ambitious to a degree almost boundless ; and not meeting with that success or those rewards of his talents which he had fondly hoped, he took refuge in a voluntary death, and left a monument of unfortunate degraded genius, of which a parallel will scarcely be again contemplated. * Among those who have contended that these poems were written by Rowley, Dr. Milles, dean of Exeter, aad Mr. Bryant, arc the most conspicuous. The principal writers who have con* Vol. HI. F ^ 66 Poelry. [CHAP. XX. and interesting discussion, the latter opinion seems to be considered as, on the whole, the better sup- ported, and more probable. The poems in dispute possess a very extraordi- nary character. The subjects are generally well chosen and interesting ; the plot, fable, and ma- chinery, show the author to have had a vigorous and active imagination ; the delineation of cha- racter, and the luxuriancy of description with which they abound, evince a happy union of taste and genius; and, different from all the poetical productions which were written at the time when these are asserted to have been composed, they •are in general remarkable for harmony and ele- gance of versification *. Indeed, good judges have pronounced, fhat some passages arc inferior in none of the essentials of poetry to the most finished works of modern times. If the poems in question be attributed to Row- ley, then we are presented with the singular spec- tacle of oiie of the first English poets, both in time and merit, sleeping in obscurity for more than three hundred years, and being at last robbed of his just reputation by the most wonderful literary delusion that cvxt possessed mankind. If, on the other hand, it be concluded that Chattorton was tended fhat Ch?-tterton is the real author, are Walpole, Tyrwhitt, Gray, Warton, Mason, Croft, and Malone. * This harmony and elegance of versification appear under all the disadvantages of the antiquated diction adopted by the author. If Chattcrton was the author of the poems, it was necessary to Tiis purpose to employ this diction ; and he is supposed to have become familiar with the language of the fifteenth century by perusing the works of CJiaucer. Chap. XX.] Poetry. 67 the real author of the poems ascribed to Rowley, then the eighteenth century gave birth to the most astonishing genius that ever existed; a genius sublime and universal ; and which, considering that all his efforts were made before he reached his eighteenth year, may probably be pronounced with safety to have been an unique in the history of man *. Xo poet of reputation had appeared in America prior to the eighteenth century. But since the commencement of this period, the western hemi- sphere, and especially that part of the continent denominated the United States, has given birth to several poets of respectable character. Among these the rev. Dr. Dwight, before mentioned, holds a distinguished place. His Conquest of Ca- naan, though a juvenile performance, and labour- ing inider several disadvantages, contains much excellent versification f, and, in general correct- ness, has not been often exceeded. Greenfieid Hill, a moral, didactic, and descriptive poem, by the same author, is also entitled to considerable praise, for exhibiting pure and elevated sentiment, just principles, and beautiful descriptions, in har- * Mr. Wharton speaks of Chatterton as " a prodigy of genius." Mr. Malone believes him to iiave been " the sjreatest genius that England has produced since the days of Shakspeare." Mr. Croft says, " no such human being, at any period of life, has ever been known, or possibly can be known." f This is the opinion of Dr. Darwin, expressed in a note to his celebrated poem. The Botanig Garden. \ ¥ 2 68 Poetry.- [Chap. XX'. monioiis and excellent verse. The M'Fingal of Mr, Trumbull was mentioned in a former page, a-=: doing high honour to the talertts of its author. The Vision of Columhus, and other poems, by Mr. Barlow, are possessed of much poetic merit. To these may be added the various productions of Mr. Humphreys, Mrs. Morton, Dr. Ladd, Mr. Freneau, and several others, who, though far from being worthy of a place among the first class of poets, have yet manifested talents honourable to themselves and their country, and have been noticed with respect by foreign as well as domes- tic critics. From the statement contained in the last para^ graph, it appears that New England, and particu- larly the state of Connecticut, has been more di- stinguished by the production of poetical genius, than any other part of our country. Of the few poets to which North America has given birth, several of the most eminent ate natives of that State. But though the conspicuous poets of America are not numerous, we are by no means to ascribe this circumstance either to the paucity or the bar- renness of American genius. Great poetical me- rit has been rare in all ages, and in all countries 5 and that it should be peculiarly rare in a coun- try Mdiere literature has comparatively few vota- ries, and where those who have any taste for let- ters have little respite fi'om the toils of professional and active lifcj is so far from being unaccountable, that the contrary would be wonderful. CiiAP. XX.] Poetry. 69 After the foregoing details, it may not be im- proper, before closing this chapter, to offer some general reflexions on the peculiar poetic charac- ter of the eighteenth centmy. Having already employed so many pages on this subject, the most brief and general views only will be at- tempted. The last a^e exceeds all preceding periods with respect to the quantity of its poetry. It is per- haps not going beyond the truth to say, that a greater amount of poetic composition was pub- lished in the course of the eighteenth century, ihan all former asies toG^ether could furnish. It may also be stated as a general truth, that the poetry of the last age is more distinguished for taste tlian genius ; more remarkable for polish, smoothness, and harmony, than for invention, strength, and boldness of thought and imagery ; Tere Italian writers, who flourished lu the sixteenth century. ■\ La Bruyere wrote towards the close of the seventeenth century. t Johnsou's L/feo/ Addison. Chap. XXL] Literary Journals. 85 Dr. Johnson, " adjusted, like Casa, the unsettled practice of daily intercourse by propriety and po- liteness ; and, like la Bruyere, exhibited the cha- racters and manners of the age. But to say that they united the plans of two or three eminent writers, is to give them but a small part of their due praise. They superadded literature and cri- ticism, and sometimes towered far above their pre- decessors, and taught, with great justness of argu- ment, and dignity of language, the most impor- tant duties and sublime truths. AH these topics were happily varied with elegant fictions and re- fined allegories, and illuminated with different changes of style and felicities of invention. It is said by Addison, in a subsequent work, that they had a perceptible influence upon the conversation of that time, and taught the frolic and the gay to unite merriment with decency; an effect which they can never wholly lose while they continue to be among the first books by which both sexes are initiated in the elegances of knowledge *." The Spectator had not beeu supported more than eighteen months when it was discontinued. The year after, viz, in 1713, the G^iardiaji was undertaken by the same editor, assisted by the gentlemen before mentioned, as well as by Mr. Pope, Dr. Berkley, and others, and continued a little more than six months, with nearly the same respectability and success which had attended its predecessor. It was natural for the excellence and the reputation of these papers to produce ^Tiany imitations. Accordingly, for a number of * Life of Addison, 86 Literary Journals. [Chap. XXI. years afterwards, periodical papers were continu- ally announced, and pursued for a little while, under different names, and upon various plans j but they were generally feeble when compared with the noble models which had gone before them, and seldom commanded the public atten- tion for any length of time. Among these might be enumerated the Hiimoiirisf, the Observer^ and a vast multitude of others that rose into view% lived their day, and sank into forgetfulness. The Free-Thinker, Cato's Letters, and the Craftsman, were executed with greater ability, and were also better received, being more devoted to political discussion, than the papers which had gone before them. In 1150 the Rambler appeared, and for the first time presented a rival to the enchanting productions of Addison and his contemporaries. In this work Dr. Johnson, the principal writer, carried the composition of moral essays and instructive narrations, with respect to purity and dignity of sentiment, acuteness of observation, and vigour of style, to a higher degree of perfec- tion than they had ever before reached. Next followed the Idler, also by Dr. Johnson, but less; laboured, and more light and superficial in its cha- racter, than the Rambler. These were succeeded by the Adventurer, the World, the Connoisseur, thq Mirror, the Looker On, the Lounger, and the Ob- server, which generally consist of papers of great merit, and will long be read with pleasure. The numerous unsuccessful attempts which have been made, within a few years past, to revive this mode of writing, seem to indicate that it is nearly ex- hausted; and that to renew and carry it on re- Chap. XXI.] Literary Journals. 87 quires more diligence, ability, and leisure, than commonly fall to the lot of those who adventure in such a field. From the foregoing details it appears that the eighteenth century may be emphatically called the age of periodical publications. In the number of these it so far transcends all preceding times, as to forbid comparison ; and their amusing popular forni constitutes a peculiarity in the literary his- tory of the period under consideration equally signal. They form the principal means of diffus- ing knowledge through every part of the civilised world ; they convey, in an abridged and agreeable manner, the contents of many ponderous volumes, ^nd frequently supersede the appearance of such volumes ; and they record every species of infor- mation, from the most sublime investigations of science to the most trifling concerns of amusement. When the future historian shall desire to obtain a /correct view of the state of literature and of man- ners, during this period, he will probably resort to the periodical publications of the day, as presents ing the richest sQurces of information, and forming ithe most enliglitened and infallible gui4es in hi? iCpurse, 88 CHAPTER XXII. POLITICAL JOURNALS. X HE method of announcing political events, and the various articles of foreign and domestic intel- ligence which usually engage the attention of the pul^lic, by means of Gazettes or Ncivspapers, seems to have been first employed in Italy, as early as the year 1536 *. It was in that country that these vehicles of information received tjie name Ga- %etta-\y which they have ever since retained J. The earliest newspaper printed in Great Britain was " The English Mercurie, by Clp'istopher Bar- * The first Gazette is sairl to have been printed at Venice, and to have been published monthly. It was under the direction of the government. t The word Gazetta is said, by some, to be derived from Ga- zerra, a Magpie; or Chatterer ; by others, from the name of a little coin called Gazetta, peculiar to the city of Venice, where news- papers were first printed, and which was the common price of i these periodical pnblications ; while a third class of critics sup- pose it to be derived from the Latin word Gaza, colloquially lengthened into the diminutive Gazetta, and, as applied to a news- paper, signifying a little treasury of jieivs. — Curiosities of Litera- ture, vol. i, p. 27 1 . X Those who first wrote newspapers were called by the Italians Menanti; because, says Vossius, they intended commonly by these loose papers to spread about defamatory reflexions, and were therefore prohibited by Gregory XIII, by a particular bull, under the name of Menantes, fi'om the Latin minanfes. — (^uriosU ties of Literature, vol. i, p, 273. Chap. XXII.] Political Journals. 89 ker," her highness's printer, in 1.588. But public prints of this kind, after the dispersion of the Spa^ nish armada, seldom appeared. The first regu- lar weekly newspaper published in this country was by Nathaniel Butter, in August 1622, en- titled '* The certaine Naves of this present Weeke.'* Three years afterward another of a similar kind was established. But during the civil wars, which took place under the protectorate of Cromwell, these channels of public intelligence became more numerous than ever, and were diligently employ- ed by both parties to disseminate their opinions among the people. About that time appeared the Mer cur ills Aulicus, the Mercurius llusticus, the Meixuriiis Civicus, &c. And it is said, that ^^ when any title grew popular, it was frequently stolen by some antagonist, who, by this stra- tagem, obtained access to those who would not have received him, had he not worn the appear- ance of a friend. These papers soon became a public nuisance. Serving as receptacles of party malice, they set the minds of men more at vari- ance, inflamed their resentments into greater fierceness, and gave a keener and more destructive edge to civil discord. But the convulsions of those unhappy days left few either the leisure, the tran- quillity, or the inclination, to treasure up occa- sional or curious compositions ; and so mugh were t;hey neglected that a complete collection is now no where to be found, ^V^^^ little is known respect- ing them *." * Johnspn's Jjife of A.dd\so^, 90 Political Journals. [Chap. XXII, The earliest British Gazette of which any di- stinct record remains was that published in 1663 by sir Roger L'Estrange, under the title of the Public Intelligencer. This he continued until the y^T 1665, when a kind of court newspaper was es\;ablished at Oxford, then the seat of govern- ment, and issued every Tuesday. The first num- ber was printed in the month of November of that year, and appears to have superseded sir Roger's. Soon after this the court was removed to London, on which the title of the paper was changed to the London Gazette, the name which it still bears. From the middle of the seventeenth century the> employment of newspapers as channels of intel- ligence became more frequent and popular, not only in Great Britain, but also in several other countries of Europe. Newspapers and pamphlets were prohibited in England by royal proclamation in 1680. At the Revolution, in 1688, this prohi- bition was taken oil; but in a few years after- ward newspapers were made the objects of tax- ation, and were first stamped for this purpose in 1713. Their number, however, has been constant- ly increasing from that period till the present time : but since the beginning of the eighteenth century, this increase, particularly in Great Bri- tain *, France, Germany, and America, has been almost incredibly great. * There was no newspaper in Scotland till after the accession 6f king William and queen Mary. At the Union there were three established in that part of the united kingdom. In th« kingdoni of Great Britain the whol^ number of newspapers print- Chap. XXII.] Political Journals. 91 Perhaps in no respect, and certainly in n© o^her enterprise of a literary kind, have the United States made such rapid progress as in the esta- blisKment of political journals. At the beginning of the eighteenth century there was no publication of this kind in the American Colonies. The first newspaper printed in America was i\\e BostonNews- Leftery begun April 24th, 1704, in the tpwn, of which it bears the name, by B. Green. The second was the Boston Gazette, which commenced toward the latter end of the year 1720, by Samuel Knee- land. The next year a third was published, under the title of the New-England Conrant, by James Franklin *. Between the last mentioned year and 1730, three other newspapers were published in Boston, though some of them appear to have been soon laid aside. As the first printing work done in North America was executed in Massa- chusetts, so in that colony the earliest, and for a number of years the most vigorous aud success- ful exertions were made for the establishment and circulation of political journals. The first newspaper printed in Pennsylvania was The American Weekly Mercury, by Andrew Bradford, the publication of wliich commenced December 22, 1719. The first printed in New ed in the year 1775, was 12G80000. In 1782 the number hacj increased to 15272519. At the close of the century they were still more numerous. * James Franklin was a brother of Benjamin Franklin, who afterward became so conspicuous as a man of science and a po- litician. Benjamin was at that time employed as am apprentice in his brother's office, aad tontributed much tp render the Cow fant popular. n Political Journals. [Chap. XXIL York, it is believed, was by William Bradford *, October 16th, 1725, under the title of The Nctc^- York Gazette. The lirst paper published in Rhode Island was the Rhode-Island Gazette, by James Franklin, before mentioned, who began the pub- lication in October 1732. The first in Connecti- cut was by James Parker, in 17-55; and the first in Nezv Hampshire, by Daniel Fowle, in 1756. The periods at which Gazettes were first intro- duced into the other states are not certainly known. In 1771 they had increased to the num- ber of fwenly-frce ; and in 1801 more than one hundred and eighty different newspapers wer&- printcd in different parts of the United States f . * The family of the Bradfords deserves to be mentioned in hononrable connexion with that of the Greens, in the annals of American printing. The press of Samuel Green was the first introduced into New England ; and the pi'esses of Andrew and William Bradford were, it is believed, the first established ia Pennsylvania and Ncav York. It is remarkable that there has been, for more than a century past, in both these families, a constant and respectable succession of printers. •f Of these vik)(yjX fifteen are dailu papers; and supposing 1000 copies of each to be printed, the whole number of copies an- nually distributed, making due alloAvance for Sundays, b^c, will be about 4590000. The number printed three times a week is about nine. Of these, supposing 800 copies to be on an average, (rtricken off, the amount annually distributed will be 1080000. About twenty-five are printed tvoice a Aveek. Of these, alloAving 800 copies each to be the common number sent abroad, the nunir ber annually circulated Avill be 2000000. Finally, about one hundred and thirtj/ newspapers are printed iveeklij ; and, alloAving the number of each published to be 800, the amount of this class annually' edited Avill be 5408000. So that the whole number of neAV'spapers annually circulated in the United States may be estimated at thirteen niilllons and seventr/'eight thousand. For the s^e of being rather beloAV than above the mark, say tvoelve mih Chap. XXIL] Political Joiiniah. ^2 It is worthy of remark, tlitit newspapers have almost entirely changed their form and character within the period under review. For a long time after they were first adopted as a medium of com- munication to the public, they were confined in gejlteral to the mere statement o^ facts. But they have gradually assumed an office more extensive, and risen to a more important station in society^ Tliey have become the vehicles of discussion, in which the principles of government, the interests of nations, the spirit and tendency of public mea- sures, and the public and private characters of indi- viduals, are all arraigned, tried, and decided upon. Instead therefore of being considered now, as they once were, of small moment in society, they have become immense moral and political engines, closely connected with the welfare of the state, and deeply involving both its peace and prosperity. Newspapers have also become important in a literary view. There are few of them, within the last twenty years, which have not added to their political details some curious and useful informa- tion on the various subjects of literature, science, and art. They have thus become the means of conveying to every class in society innumerable scraps of knowledge, which have at once increased the public intelligence, and extended the taste for perusing periodical publications. The advertise^ lions. It will be seen, by comparing this Avith a preceding note, that, while the population of the United States is not more tlian one hulfoi that of Great Britain, the number of newspapers cir- culated in the former country may be estimated at more than mo M/VJy of the number published in the latter. — See 4dditioiiul N^Uf!, (Hj. 94 Political Journals. [Chap. XXII. menta, moreover, which they daily contain, re- specting new books, projects, inventions, discove- ries, and improvements, are well calculated to en- large and enlighten the public mind, and are wor- thy of being enumerated among the many me- thods of awakening and maintaining the popular attention with which more modern times, beyond all preceding example, abound. In ancient times, to sow the seeds of civil dis- cord, or to produce a spirit of union and coope- ration through an extensive community, required time, patience, and a constant series of exertions. The art of printing being unknown, and many of the modern methods of communicating intelli- gence to distant places not having come into use, the dillicuhy of conducting public aifuirs must have been frequently great and embarrassing. The general circulation of Gazetti^s forms an im- portant era, not only in the moral and literarj'-, but algo in the political world. By means of this powerful instrument impressions on the public mind may be made with a celerity and to an ex- tent of which our remote ancestors had no con- ception, and which cannot but give rise to the most important consequences in society. Never was there given to man a political engine of greater power ; and never, assuredly, did this en- gine before operate upon so large a scale as in the eighteenth century. America in particular, and especially for the ^ast twelve or fifteen years, has exhibited a spec- tacle never before displayed among men, and even yet without a parallel on earth : it is the spectacle, jjot of the learned and the wealthy only, but of GhaP. XXII.] Political Journals. 9^ the great body of the people, even a large por- tion of that class of the community which is des- tined to daily labour having free and constant access to public prints, receiving regular infor- mation of every occurrence, attending to the course of political affairs, discussing public mea- sures, and having thus presented to them con- stant excitements to the acquisition of knowledge, and continual means of obtaining it. Never, it may be safely asserted, was the numl)er of poli- tical journals so great, in proportion to the popu- lation of a country, as at present in America : never were they, all things considered, so cheap, so universally diffused, and so easy of access * : and never were they actually perused by so large a majority of all classes, since the art of printing was discovered. The general effects of this unprecedented mul- tiplication and diffusion of public prints form a subject of the most interesting and complex calcula- tion. On the one hand, when well conducted, they have a tendency to disseminate useful infor- mation ; to keep the public mind awake and ac- tive ; to confirm and extend the love of freedom ; to correct the mistakes of the ignorant, and tlie i^i- positions of the crafty j to tear off the mask from corrupt and designing politicians ; and finally to promote union of spirit and of action among the ;nost distant members of an extended community. * The extreme clieapness with which newspapers are con- veyed by the mail, in the United States, added to the circuni- stance of their being altogether unencumbered with a stamp duty, or any other public restriction, renders their circulation ffiore coQyenient and general than in any other country. 96 Political Journab. [CilAP. XXII. But to pursue a path calculated to produce these elTects, the conductors of public prints ought to be men of talents, learning, and virtue. Under the guidance of such characters, every Gazette vvoitlil be a source of ?no!Til and potitical instruc- tion, and of course a public blessing. On the other handj when an instrument so po- tent is committed to the weak, the ignorant, and the vicious, the most baneful consequences must be anticipated. When men of small talents^ of lit- tle information, and of less virtue, undertake to be (as the editors of public gazettes, however con- temptible their character, may in a degree be considered) the directors of public opinion, what must be the result ? We may expect to see the fri- volities of weakness, the errours and malignity of prejudice, the misrepresentations of party zeal, the most corrupt doctrines in politics and morals, the lacerations of private character, and the pol- luting language of obscenity and impiety, daily issuing from the press, poisoning the principles, and disturbing the repose of society ; giving to the natural an%l salutary collisions of parties the most brutal violence and ferocity ; and at length consuming the best feelings and noblest charities of life in the flame of civil discord. In the former part of the eighteenth century, talents and Iea^rniJlg, at least, if not virtue, Vv^ere thought necessary in the conductors of political journals *. Few ventured to intrude into this ar- * This has not been, generally, so much the case in Ame- rica as in Europe. From the earliest period too many of their Gazettes have been iu the hands of persons destitute both •f taltats and literature. But, in later times, the number of CliAP. XXII.] Political Journals. 97 duous office, but those who had some cUihns to li- terature. Towards the close of the centur}^ how- ever, persons of less character, and of humbler qualifications, began without scruple to undertake the high task of enlightening the public mind. This remark applies, in some degree, to Europe j but it applies with particular force to America, where every judicious observer must perceive that too many of the Gazettes are in the hands of per- sons destitute at once of the urbanity of gentle- uicn, the information of scholars, and the princi- ples of virtue. To this source, rather than to any peculiar depravity of national character, we may ascribe the faults of American newspapers, Mhich liave been pronounced hy travellers the most profligate and scurrilous public prints in the ci- vilised world*. editors wlio fait ijndcr this description has become even greater tlian fornifTly. * These considerations, it is conceived, are abundantly suffi- cient to account 'for the disagreeable character of American newspapers. In every country the selfish principle prompts men to defame their personal and political enemies ; and whore the supposed provocations to this are numerous, and no restraints are imposed on the indulgence of the disposition, an inundation of filth and calumny must be expected. In the United States the frequency of elections leads to a corresponding frequency of struggle between political parties; these struggles naturally en- gender mischievous passions, and every species of coarse invec- tire ; and, unhappily, too many of the conductors of their public prints have neither the discernment, the firmness, nortiie virtue to reject from their pages the foul ebullitions of prejudice and malice. Had they more diligence, or greater talents, they might render their Gazettes interesting, by filling them with materials of a more instructive and dignified kind ; but wanting these qualifications, they must give such materials, accompi nied Vol. III. II 98 Political Journals. [Chap. XXIt. If the foregoing remarks be just, then the friend of rational freedom, and of social happiness, can- not but contemplate with the utmost solicitude the future influence of political journals on the welfare of society. As they form one of the great safeguards of free government, so they also form one of its most threatening assailants: and unless public opinion (the best remedy that can be ap- plied) should administer an adequate correction of the growing evil, we may anticipate the arrival of that crisis in which we must yield either to an abridgement of the liberty of the press, or to a disruption of every social bond. with such a seasoning, as circumstances furnish. Of what kinj these are, no one is ij^aorant. 99 CHAPTER XXIII. LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC ASS0CUTIQN5. -t* OR a long time after the revival of learning in Europe, men devoted to letters were in a great measure insulated with respect to each other. We read, it is true, of a society of learned men, associated for the. purpose of promoting literature and science, as early as the time of Charlemagne ; but the plan appears to have been rude and de- fective. Several others were institufed in Italy, in the si^^teenth century ; still, however, they seem to have been, both in their formation and effects, much inferior to many which have flourished since. The most enlarged ideas of literary societies seem to have originated with the great lord Bacon, who, in his Ncxv Atalantis, delineated a plan of one more liberal and extensive than had ever before existed. But although his project received little encouragement from his contemporaries, it was destined to produce important eliects not long afterward. In the seventeenth century, the taste for form- ing scientific and literary, societies may be said to have commenced its prevalence, and to have gained considerable ground. It was a little' after the middle of that century that the two most conspicuous associations of the kind in Europe, Tiie Boval Society of Great Britain, and The Royal H 2 ■ 100 Literary Association j. [Chap. XXIII. Academy of Sciences of France, were formed. The former by Mr. Boyle, Mr. Hooke, and a number of others, who at that time held a high station in the philosophical world ; and the latter by Lewis XR'^, prompted by the suggestion and assisted by the counsels of his minister, M. Colbert. But the eighteenth century is preeminently re- markable for multiplying these associations; for a great increase in the number of their publications ; and for their unexampled activity and usefulness in the cause of science. Bv far the frreater num- ber of the societies for promoting useful know^ledge Avhich now exist in the world, were formed du- ring the period under consideration. Among these the most important and useful are the Imperial Academy of Sciences at St. Petersburg; the Royal Academies of Stockholm, Copenhagen, Berlin, and Lisbon ; the Royal Society of EdirJourgh, and the Royal Irish Academy of Dublin. Beside these, a multitude of others have arisen, under different names, for various purposes, and at different pe- riods of the century, in Great Britain, France, Italy, Germany, and almost ever}'' literary coun- try of Europe. Perhaps in no part of the world have institutions of this kind been so much multi- plied as in Italy; and next to her, in the number and activity of similar associations, we may esti- mate Franc^e. In the former there is scarcely a town of any importance without an academy or literary association; and in the latter they are very numerous. In addition to the societies formed for promot- ing general literature and science, the eighteenth century h distinguished by the formation of many CllAP. XXIII.] Literary Associations. 101 other associations, for promoting some particular art or branch of science. There were instituted, during this period, academies of Painting, of Sculpture, of Music, of Inscriptions and Belles- Lettres, of Lazv, of Medicine, of Arts and Manu- factures, of Agriculture, and indeed for cultivat- ing almost every particular department of human art and knowledge. It was before remarked that the publications made by these societies and academies, exhibit- ing the result of their labours, were more nume- rous, more valuable, and more generally circu- lated, during the eighteenth century, than in any former period. They amount to many hundred volumes, and hold an important place among the literary and scientific productions of the age. We had occasion to remark, in a former part of this work, that the discoveries in Geography, and the numerous improvements in Navigation, during the last age, had led to a great and unex- ampled increase of the intercourse of men. The same effect has been produced, in modern times, by the formation of so many learned societies, by their great extent, their frequent meetings, their numerous publications, and by their correspoii- dewce and mutual interchange of literary ho- nours. Never, assuredly, at any former period, were learned men so well acquainted with the labours and the characters of each other, so fi'ee and mutually instructive in their intercourse, or enabled so far to combine their talents and in- dustry in the pursuit of important investigations. But this is by no means the only advantage of these associations. They may be reckoned among 102 Literary Associations. [Chap. XXIII. the principal causes of the superiority of the mo- derns over the ancients, especially in the physical sciences. They have kindled a spirit of emula- tion among the learned ; they have stimulated into action many useful talents, by holding out literary rewards ; and they have suggested ob- jects of inquiry, and methods of experiment, which might otherwise have passed unobserved and forgotten. Such societies, also, have furnish- ed useful repositories for the observations and discoveries of the ingenious, and have thus been enabled to present to the world many valuable productions, which would probably otherwise have been lost through the modesty, the indo- lence, or the poverty of authors. Literary and scientific associations, moreover, by extending their honours to distant countries, bind more closely together the members of the republic of' letters in different quarters of the globe, and teach them to feel as brethren embarked in the sp.me" cause. They may even be said, in some in- stances, to have a great influence in advancing national prosperity, and promoting a spirit of ge- neral improvement. It is true, in accounting for these facts, other causes may be assigned which, beyond doubt, contributed to their production ; but it can as little be doubted that the increased intercourse and connexion among the learned, by means of the establishment of academics and so- cieties, ought to be considered as holding a place among the most important sources of modern im- provements in science. ^ The formation of literary and scientific associa- tions in the United States be^an to take nlace in CjiaP. XXIII.] Literm-y Association!;. 103 the latter half of the eighteenth century. Within that period many useful societies have been insti- tuted which deserve some notice. The principal of these are the following : 1. Societies and Academies of Arts and Sciences^ Of this class there are several. " The American Philosophical Society, held at Philadelphia, for promoting useful knowledge," was instituted in January 1769- It was formed by the union of two smaller societies, which had for some time existed in that city, and has been ever since con- tinued on a very respectable footing, This so- ciety has published four quarto volumes of its transactions, containing many ingenious papers on literature, the sciences, and arts, which exhibit American talents and industry in a favourable light. Over this institution have successively pre- sided, Benjamin Franklin, David Rittenhouse, and Thoraas Jefferson *. The American Acade- my of Arts and Sciences, held at Boston, was esta^ blished in May 1780, by the council and house of representatives of Massachusetts, " for promote ing the knowledge of the antiquities of America, and of the natural history of the country j for de- termining the uses to which its various natural productions might be applied ; for encouraging medicinal discoveries, mathematical disquisitions, philosophical inquiries and experiments, astrono- mical, meteorological, and geographical obsei> rations, and improvements in agriculture, manu- factures, and commerce ; and, in short, for culti- vating every art and science which may tend to * See Additional Notcsj (I), 104 Literal'}; Associations. [Cha?. XXIII. advance the interest, honour, dignity, and happi^ ness of a free, independent, and virtuous people," This academy has published one quarto volume of its transactions, and several parts of a second, which will probably soon be completed. The contents of its respective publications afford a very honourable specimen of learning and diligence in the members, and furnish ground for expecta- tions of still greater utility, The gentlemen who have presided o\ier this association are James Bowdoin, and John Adams*. The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Scioices was formed in 1799, at New-Haven, " for the purpose of encouraging literary and philosophical researches in general, and particularly for investigating the natural his- tory of that state." This society has existed so short a time, that no publication of its proceed- ings, of any extent, could yet be reasonably exr pected. The gentleman first elected presidentj and who yet remains in that office, is the rev. Dr. Timothy Pwight, president of Yale college. 2. Historical Society. The only association of this kind in the United States is in Massachu- setts. It was instituted in the beginning of the year 1791, and the late rev. Dr. Belknap, the ho- nourable judge Tudoi'. and the rev. Dr. Eliot, are more entitled to the honour of being called its founders- than any other individuals f. The "^ See Additional Notes, (K). f Dr. Belknap, whose taste for liistorical researches is well known, and who has rendered such important service to the in- terests of American history, first urged the adoption of some plan for collecting and preserving the numerous historical documents relating to that couiitr}'-, and especially to New England, which Cl.ur* XXIII.] Literary Associations, 105 design of this association is to collect and pre- serve all documents, either manuscript or printed, which have a tendency to throw light on the na- tural, civil, ecclesiastical, or literary history of America. It has already made very large and valuable collections, an important portion of which has been laid before the public *, and it bids fair to be one of the most useful institutions in the country f. 3. Medical Societies. Prior to the revolution which made the United States fiee and indepen- dent, the physicians of that country aiTorded little instruction or aid to each other. Scattered over an immense territory, seldom called to confer were widely scattered, and rapUly falling a prey to the destroy- ing hand of time. He was zealously seconded by judge Tudor, who first proposed the formation of a society for this purpose, and by the rev. Dr. Eliot, who engaged with ardour in the plan> and has been since one of the most active and useful members of the institution. These gentlemen were soon joined, and ably assisted, by the rev. Drs. Thatcher and Freeman, by the honour- able judges Sullivan and Minot, Mr. Wiuthrop, and several others, \A ho were membefs of the association when first orga- nised. *■ The historical documents published by the Society amount to seven octa\ o volumes. t By far the greater part of the publications made by this so- ciety relate to the history of New England. This has arisen, not from any blamable partiality of the resident members to the history of their own country ; but from tlie negligence of \.\\Qcorresponding\\\cmhe'c?. tomake communications respecting the several states to which tliey belong. It is earnestly to be wished, cither that gentlcjuen of a literary character in different parts of the United States would consider the society in Boston as a na- tional one, and exert themselves to render it more extensively useful ; or, without dehiy, form independent societies for the ^^me purpose, to act ia cooperation with the parent society. 106 Litcrar]) Assoclatloiis. [Chap. XXIII. together and compare opinions, and little habi- tuated to the task of committing their observa- tions to writing, each was compelled to proceed almost unassisted and alone. Soon after the confusion and devastation of war had given v/ay to the arts of peace, attempts began to be made to remedy this serious evil. Associations for the purpose of improving medical science were soon formed, not only in Philadelphia, which had been for some years the seat of a medical school, but in almost every state in the union. Few of these societies have made very large or important pub- lications J but they have produced many lasting advantages to the individuals composing them, and to the interests of the healing art. They have brought physicians to be acquahited with rach other. They have collected a large mass of facts, hints, observations, and inquiries, which, if not always given to the world, constitute a source of improvement to the associates themselves. They have instituted annual orations, which, in various ways, tend to promote their primary ob- ject. They have issued prize questions, and be- stowed premiums, which awaken dormant powers, and excite a laudable spirit of emulation. In a word, they have contributed to raise the practice of medicine in America from a selfish and sordid trade, to a libei:al, dignified, and enlightened pro- fession. • 4. AgrkuUural Societies. Associations for the promotion of agriculture and the auxiliaiy arts and sciences, while they have been multiplied in every part of the scientific world, have also, during the latter half of the last century, l^ecom^ Chap. XXIII.] Litej-ary Associations, 107 jiumerous in America. There is scarcely a state ill the Union in which an institution of this kind has not been establir^hed; and in some of the states there are more than one. The most con- spicuous and active of these associations are those established in Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsyl^Fania. That in New York, denomi- nated the Society for promoting Agriculture^ ArlSy and Manufactures^ has been particularly distin- guished, and, it is believed, is the only one of this nature in the United States which has made a re- gular publication of its proceedings, and of the principal memoirs communicated by its mem- bers *. The useful elfects of these institutions are undeniably great in various parts of the country. They have excited a spirit of inquiry, experiment, and diligence, in agricultural pur- suits, among a considerable portion of the citi- zens ; they have contributed to raise the dignity and importance of agriculture in the popular opi- nion \ they have collected facts and doctrines, from different districts, for more full trial and sa- tisfactory comparison ; and if they have encou- raged 'in any cases a disposition for speculative and visionary farming, they have promoted, in a still greater degree, practical and valuable im- provements. The literary and scientific associations of the eighteenth century differed considerably from those which were formed in preceding times. Be- * The Agncultural Socieij/ of Massachusetts the author be- lieves, has published several small works; but he has not been so fortunate as to see them, ©r to be J)articularly informed of their contents. 108 Literary Associations. [Chap. XXIII side being more numerous, they were also more extensive in their plan, and embraced a greater number of distant and foreign associates ; they directed more of their attention to the physical sciences, and rendered the mode of inquiry by experiment more general and more accurate ; and, fmally, they were more active in their ex- ertions, kept more heads and hands at work, and engaged more of the public attention, than the societies of preceding tinies^. 109 CHAPTER XXIV, ENCYCLOPAEDIAS AND SCIENTIFIC DICTIONARIES- Almost all the works of this kind which exist are productions of the last age. The first at- tempt of which we read, to give a distinct and ^[lethodical view of all arts and sciences, in a se- ries of volumes, was that by Avicenna, the great Arabian philosopher and physician, who flou- rished in the eleventh century. At the age of twenty-one, as we are told, he conceived the bold design of incorporating into one work all the parts of human knowledge then studied ; and, in pur- suance of this plan, compiled a real Encydopce- dia, in twenty volumes, to which he gave the name of The Utility of Ul Hides, The art of print- ing, however, being then unknown, it is not to be supposed that his work had any considerable cir- culation, or that it contributed much to the pro- motion of knowledge. The next publication of this kind worthy of notice, is the Margarita PhilosopJiica, by Reis- chius, a learned German, printed at Strasburg, in I0O9. About the same time with Reischius flourished Andrew Matthew Acquaviva, duke of Alti and Teramo, in thj kingdom of Naples, who formed a plan of a universal dictionary of arts and sciences, to wliich he first gave the name x)^ no EncydopcecUas, Kc. [Chap. XXIV. an Enqjclopctdia, which has been since generally employed to designate works of" this class. After Acquaviva, no literary labourer seems to have engaged in so hardy an enterprise, until Alste- dius, a German protestant divine, who, in the beginning of the seventeenth century, published ati Enc\xlopasdia, which Was highly esteemed even among catholics. It was printed at LyoiiS;^ and had much circulation over a considerable part of the continent of Europe. These appear to have been the most important, if not the whole, of the works of this kind \\ hich appeared prior to the eighteenth century; for the Dictionaries of Bayle and Moreri, published towards the close of the preceding age, though works of great la- bour and learning, yet being chiefly of a biogra- phical and historical nature, can scarcely have a place assigned them, with propriety, in the pre-^ sent list. About the beginning of the eighteenth cen- tury *, Dr. John Harris, an English clergyman of distinguished erudition, published his Lexicon Technicum, a work in two volumes folio, em- bracing a great variety of knowledge as it then stood, and at that period highly instructive and much esteemed. The next compilation of this kind was that produced by Mr. Ephraim Cham- bers, also of Great Britain, which first appeared in 1728, in two volumes folio, and was doubtless much superior to all that had gone before it. * It is be fieved that Dr. Harris's ^vork was first published in i70-t, the fifth edition of it is dated 1736. Chap. XXIV.] Encyclopcedlas.Kc. Ill Chambers denominated his work a Cyclopaedia^ It was the result of many years' intense applica- tion to study, and was received by the public in the most favourable manner. It went througli a number of editions within a few years after its first appearance, was soon translated into the Italian language, and had many honours heaped upon it by the learned of those time.s. This work has been since enlarged, and print- ed in four volumes folio, by Dr. Rees, and iu this improved form is much valued. The next in order vras a Dictionary of Arts and Trades, published by a society in France, antl embracing an amount of information on all me- chanical subjects, more extensive and curiou.^ than had ever before been collected. This was ,follov/ed by the celebrated French Encyclopedic. of which Messrs. d'Alembert and Diderot were the principal conductors, aided by a number of their learned countrymen. It is probable th.at they were prompted to this undertaking by tht? fame and success of Mr. Chambers's Vvork, and also by a premeditated and svst,^matic desijjn to throw all possible odium on revealed religion This great compilation was begun in 1752, and brought to a close about fifteen or twenty years afterward, in thirty-three folio volumes. A lead- ing feature of the Encyclopedie is the encourage- ment which it artfully gives throughout to the most impious infidelity ; and though much valu- able science is undoubtedly diffused through its pages, yet it is so contamuiated with the mixture of licentious principles in morals and religion, that nothing but its great voluminousness prevents 112 Encyclopaedias, SCc. [Chap. XXIV. it from being one of the most pernicious works that ever issued from the press. After the appearance of the French Encijclope- diCy baron Bieliield, of Germany, published a work which he called The Elements cf Universal Erudition. This compilation, however, is com- paratively little known, and is certainly inferior to many made both before and since. About the 3^ear 1760, a bookseller of the name of Owen published a kind of Encyclopaedia in four very large octavo volumes. This work, though less full on many subjects than some that had gone before it, yet contained much useful informa- tion, the mode of exhibiting which has been ge- neralh^ applauded. In 1764 appeared The Com- plete Dictionary of Arts oftd Sciences, in three vo- lumes folio, by the rev. Henry Temple Croker, and others. This work gained no' reputation. About the year 1773 was published, in Edin- burgh, the Encyclop(£dia Britannica, in three vo- lumes quarto, of which the principal editor was Mr. Colin Mac Farquhar, assisted by a number of the learned men around him. A second edi- tion of the same work was completed in 1783, enlarged to ten volumes quarto, executed chiefly by the same persons who had compiled the for- mer edition. A third impression, still under the same title, was undertaken in 1789, with the aid of a number of new literary labourers, and com- pleted in 1797, in eighteen quarto volumes. This work deserves to be highly commended on va- rious accounts. The friendly aspect which it bears in general toward relip;ion and good mo- rals, is entitled to much approbation : and though. Chap. XXIV.] Encydopccdias, &;c. US on some subjects, it is far from containing the same depth and extent of scientific research with the French Ency dope die, yet it presents a rich variety of knowledge, and in the general usefulness of its tendency far exceeds that cele- brated performance. From the last edition of the Encydopcedia Bri- tannica., an American impression has been given by Mr. Thomas Dobson, a respectable printer and bookseller of Philadelphia, who, with a de- gree of zeal and enterprise then altogether un- rivalled in the United States, soon after the commencement of the publication in Britain, an- nounced his intention of giving it to the Ame- rican public through the medium of his own press. His plan has been executed in a manner equally honourable to himself and his patrons 3 and his edition, on account of many valuable additions and corrections, deserves to be consi- dered as decidedly superior to that from which the greater part of it was copied*. In 17S3 some of the literati of France, not sa- tisfied either with the plan or the execution of the grand Encydopedie, which had attracted so much of the public attention, commenced a new work under the title of the Encydopedie Metho' dique. This has been, with some propriety, called a Didionary of Diclionaries. It is entirely on a new plan, and was lately finished, having reached the wonderful extent of tiuo hundred volamts in quarto. It is scarcely necessary to say, that this * Beside other new matter, Mr. Dobson's edition contains much important information respecting the United States not contained in tJie work as it game from the British prcia. 114 Encyclopcediasy k^c, [CilAP. XXIV. last work, executed by many of the persons who "were engaged in the preceding, bears, like that, an antireligious complexion ; and that, while it displays much genius, learning, industry, and perseverance, its general tendency is highly un-^ favourable to the interests of virtue and piety. Some years before the close of the eighteenth century, a Dictionary of Arts and Sciences was undertaken by Varrentrapp and Wenner, learn- ed and enterprising booksellers at Frankfort, in Germany. This work, under the title oi AUgemeine E ncy clop ct die d'er Kiinste und Wissenschaften, has already reached to a considerable extent, but is not yet completed*. It has been said, by persons acquainted with the German language, to be, on the whole, so far as it has gone, the best Encyclo- paedia yet published. Several other compilations, intended to em- brace the circle of arts and sciences, were made in different parts of Europe, in the course of the last century. Some of these were translations or abridgements of those already mentioned, while others had better claims to originality. But too little is known of those which belong to either class, to undertake any detailed account of their characters, or even of their titles *. * The English Encyclopedia, begun a few years ago, and intended to be comprised in eight or nine volumes 4-to, was nearly concluded at the close of the century. The Em:yclo- pcEdiu Perthensis, which has been for several years printing in Perth, is also still unfinished ; as is an Encyclopwdia publishing by Mr. John Low, . an enterprising bookseller in the city of New York, in America, in which considerable progress is xua.de, and which it is expected will form six quarto volumes. Chap. XXIV.] Encydopcedias^Kc, ll.O It deserves also to be noticed, that the last age produced an unprecedented number of systematic works on particular sg^ences, exhibited in the form of dictionaries, and having the several parts disposed according to alphabetical arrangement. Of these the number is too great to be recounted. As a specimen, it may be observed, that we have dictionaries of Agr^iculture, by several associa- tions and individuals ; of Gardening, by Miller, Mawe, and others ; of Trade and Commerce, by Savary, Postlethwaite, and Rolt; of Law, by Jacob; of Mathematics, by Hutton ; of Chemis- /n/, by Macquer and Nicholson; oi Mineralogy, by Rinman ; of Botany, by Martyn ; and of Painting, Music, &c., by various persons of learn- ing and taste, in different parts of the world. That these numerous and extensive collections of the different brandies of human knovdedgo have had a considerable influence on the literary and scientific character of the age, will scarcely be questioned. They have contributed to render modern erudition multifarious rather than deep. By abridgeing the labour of the reader they have diminished his industr\^ But they have been at- tended, at the same time, with considerable ad- vantages. To those residing at a distance from large libraries, and other repositories of science, they have furnished a very instructive epitome cf knowledge. They have thus contributed to en- large the mind, and to show the connexion be- tween the several objects of study ; and though they are far from presenting a sufficiently minute and detailed view of each of the various subjects ©f which they treat ; yet, to general readers, they 12 116 Encyclopedias y 8s c. [Chap.XXIV. give more information than would probably have been gained without them ; and to readers who wish to investigate subjects more deeply, they serve as an index to more abundant sources of information. 117 CHAPTER XXV. EDUCATION. JlLDUCATION has always been considerea among the most difficult and important of those duties which are intrusted to man. Correspond^ ing with its arduous and interesting nature have been the numerous plans to facilitate its accom- plishment, or to improve its methods. Of th^se plans the eighteenth centiiry was eminently pro- ductive, as no age ever so much abounded in learned and ingenious works on this subject; but the real improvements to which the period in question has given birth, in the business of €ducation, are by no means of that radical kind which might have been expected by the sanguine, from the ..progress of society in other arts and sciences. Still, however, the last age produced some events and revolutions, with regard to this subject, which demand our notice in the present brief review. Of the numerous treatises on the subject of education, which were presented to the public in the course of the last age, there are few entitled to particular attention. Among these, perhaps the celebrated work of Rousseau, under the title of Emillus, is most extensively known. This sin- gular production undoubtedly contains some just reasoning, many excellent precepts, and not a 118 Education. [Chap. XXV. few passao^es of unrivalled eloquence. But it seems to be now generally agreed by sober re- flecting judges, that his system is neither moral in its tendency, nor practicable in its application. If the author excelled most other men in genius, he certainly had little claim either to purity of character, or real zeisdom. Beside this work, a few others are worthy of particular notice ; some of which, if they have less claim to ingenuity than the celebrated pro- duction of Rousseau, are more judicious, practi- cal, and conducive to the happiness of youth. The Method of studying and teaching the Belles Lettres, by M. Rollin, has received much atten- tion and general applause, and is preeminently favourable to the interests of virtue and piety. The Pla7i of a Liberal Kducation^ by Dr. Vicesi- mus Knox, is also the production of a learned and ingenious man, and may be ranked among the best modern treatises on this subject. The Elementar-Werk, by Basedow, of Germany, is said to be one of the most influential and useful works on education that the age produced. Much praise has also been bestowed on the Neuen Emit of professor Feder, of Gottingen, which still con- tinues to be held in esteem in the author's own country *. Towards the close of the century * The author has no acquaintance with the works of Basedow or Feder. This account of them is taken from a learned and interesting Historical Account of the Rise and Progress of Litera- tnrj in Germany, puhHshed in the German Museum of London, and said to be drawn up by the rev. Mr. Will, lately of London, at present minister of the German Calvinist church in the city of New York. Ch.ap. XXV.] Education, 119 was published a work entitled Lectures on Edu- cation, by David Williams, which, though it ma- nifests considerable talents and erudition, is de- cidedly unfriendly to religion, and consequently to genuine virtue. To these may be added, the Theatre of Education, by madame Genlis ; Prac- tical Education, by Mr. and miss Edgeworth ; and treatises on the same subject by Mrs. H, More, and miss Hamilton, which have been much read and esteemed. The eighteenth century produced a remarkable revolution with respect to the objects of study in the education of youth. These are now more ac- commodated to the different employments for which the pupils are intended than in former times. Education, during this period, has been more than ever divested of its scholastic form, and rendered more conducive to the useful purposes of life. The study of the dead languages has been gradually declining throughout the age under review, and scientific and literarj' pursuits of a more practical nature taking their place. Instead of spending eight or ten years, as for- merly, in the acquisition of Latin and Greek words and rules, youth are now more liberally instructed in the physical sciences, in belles let- tres, in modern languages, in history, in geogra- phy, and generally in those branches of know- ledge which are calculated to fit them for action, as well as speculation. Though the change in this respect has been carried to an extreme; though the disposition discovered by many in- structors, during the last fifty years, to di^car4 120 Education. [CiiAP. XXV. entirely from among the objects of study the rich stores of ancient literature, may be pronounced unfriendly to true taste and sound learning; yet the revolution which has been mentioned may be considered in general as a real improvement. Another obvious revolution which the last age has produced in the business of education, is re- moving a large portion of that constraint and ser- vility, and of those monkish habits, which were formerly connected with the diligent pursuit of knowledge, and considered a necessary part of a system of study. Modern academic discipline is much less rigid than it was a century ago : more scope is given to the natural spirit and tendencies of the youthful mind : the paths of instruction are more diversified, and more strewed with flowers : in a word, the labour of youthful study, formerly fashionable, has in a great measure ceased to exist. This has arisen from several causes ; from the growth of luxury and dissipa- tion, which are always unfavourable to sound erudition ; from the multiplication of helps and abridgements, to be hereafter mentioned, which, while they lessen the toil of the student, deceive him, by promising greater acquisitions than he can gain from them ; and especially from the plans of education in modern times being so much extended, and the objects of study so greatly mul- tiplied, as to render the wonted attention to each difficult, if not impossible. Hence the greater number of scholars, at the present day, are more remarkable for variety than depth of learning ; and liave generally contented themselves with walking Chap. XXV.] Education. 121 lightly over the fields, and plucking the flowers of literature and science, instead of digging deeply, and with unwearied patience, to gain the recon- dite treasures of knowledge *. A further circur^stance, in some degree pecu- liar to modern education, and which no doubt produces a considerable effect, is the early age at which students are admitted into the higher semii- naries of learning, and, as a necessary consequence, their premature entrance into the world. Lord Bacon somewhere remarks, that it was a defect ^n the plans of education, in his day, that studeats were introduced at too early an age to the more abstruse and grave parts of their philosophic stu- dies. This remark, in the eighteenth century, may be applied to the general period of beginning the academic course. The universities and colleges of modern times, especially in the United States, are filled with children^ who are unable either suitably to appreciate the privileges they enjoy, or so much to profit by them, as at a more mature period of life. If these higher seminaries be in-, tended, as they commonly are, to complete the education, then to send pupils to them before they * It has been asserted by good judges, and probably with truth, that one of the principal reasons to be assigned for the compara- tive superficiality of modern classical learning, even in the best seminaries, is the increased use of translations, particularly within the last sixty or seventy years. It is certain that helps of this kind, to abridge the toil of the indolent and careless, never be- fore had so general a circulation ; and it is proverbially true, that acquisitions made by means of long and patient labour are more deeply impressed on the mind, longer retained, and usually held ju higher estimation, than those which cost but little time an4 pains. 152 Education. [Chap. XXV, have emerged from the state of childhood is al- together unwise. That this circumstance has an unfavourable influence on the dignity and gene- ral success of a course of public instruction can scai-cely be doubted. That it should cooperate with other causes to render the number of superfi- dal scholars greater than they would otherwise be, seems to be an unavoidable consequence ; and that it tends to diminish the subordination and the regularity of modern academic systems, expe- rience abundantly demonstrates. The last century also produced considerable improvements in the means of instruction. These are of various kinds, and deserve our particular attention, in estimating the progress of literature during the period under consideration. The first circumstance deserving of notice under this head is the great muUiplication of Seminaries of learning, in the course of the last age. This is a very interesting feature in the period which we are endeavouring to delineate. Institutions for the purpose of instruction, from universities down to the smallest schools, were never half, perhaps not a tenth part, so numerous as at the close of the eighteenth century. In every portion of the civilised world they have increased to an astonish- ing amount; they have brought the means of education to almost every door ; and, with oppor- tunities, have presented excitements to the acqui- sition of knowledge before unknown. Charity Schools, if not first established, were gi-eatly multiplied during this century ; and per- hjips deserve to be considered as one of the most useful plans of public beneficence to which the Chap. XX V.] Education. 1^3 age gave rise. These have been numerous for many years in several countries of Europe ; but probably in no part of the world have so large a number been established, and on a footing so li- beral, as in Great Britain. Institutions of this kind have also been for some time common and highly useful in the United States. The establishment of Sunday Schools deserves to \>e mentioned as a further improvement of modern times. This is an excellent plan for disseminating the elements of useful knowledge among the more laborious and indigent portions of society ; and bids fair to be generally adopted throughout the Christian world. The last age also abounded, beyond all prece- dent, in popular zvorks\ for facilitating and improv- ing the education of youth. Of this kind are the nXimerous translationSy compends, and abridge^ inentSy which modern instructors have produced. Scarcely a department of art, science, or taste, can be mentioned, in which numerous works of this nature have not been furnished by the friends of youth. To the same class also belong the moral taleSy the histories, adventures, and selections, of which a few 3^ears past have produced an unex- ampled number and variety. Some of these per- formances have been planned with great wisdom, and executed with great felicity ; and are emi- nently suited to attract tlie youthful mind, to di- rect and strengthea its growing powers, to beget a taste for the sciences, and to cultivate the best principles of the heart. Of many others, indeed, a very different character must be given j but it is certain that parents and teachers were never be- 124 Education. [CiiAP. XXV. fore presented Avitli so rich a variety of helps, or so ample a field of choice, in works of this nature, as during the last thirty years of the period under review. Among the many writers and compilers to whom the public are indebted for their labours in this im- portant field, it is not difficult to make a selection of those who are most entitled to praise. Of this number are Mrs. Barbauld, Mrs. Trimmer, Dr. Percival, Mrs. C. Smith, miss Hannah More, Mrs. Wakefield, Mr. Day, Dr. Aikin, and miss Edge- worth, of Great Britain ; madame Genlis, abbe Gaul- tier, M. de Beaumont, and M. Berquin, of France ; Messrs. Basedow, Campe, Salzmann, and von Ro- chow, of Germany ; and Mr. Lindley Murray, and Mr. Noah Webster, of America. To say that the performances of all these have commanded much at- tention, and that those of several of them have been eminently and extensively useful, would be to describe their merits in a very imperfect manner. From this multiplication of the means and faci- lities of education we may account for the fact, that during the last century the advantages of edu- cation M^ere more extensively diffused through the different ranks of society than in any former age. It may safely be asserted, that there never was a period in which the elements of useful knowledge were so common and popular as during that which is under review. In all preceding stages of hu- man improvement, knowledge was possessed by a few. Before the invention of printing, indeed, the obstacles in the way of a general diffusion of in- formation were numerous, and almost insurmount- able j and even with the advantage of that invew-= Chap. XXV.] Education. U5 tion, it was in a great measure confined to the opulent, until within the last hundred years. During this period, the great increase in the num- ber of seminaries of learning ; the wonderful mul- tiplication of circulating and other libraries ; the growing practice of divesting the most important parts of knowledge of their scholastic dress, and detaching them from the envelopments of dead languages; with various other considerations; have all conspired to extend the advantages of education, and to render the elements of useful knowledge more cheap and common tlian ever before. Towards the close of \he eighteenth century, the physical education of youth became an ob- ject of more particular attention than in any former period. The considerations of bodily health and vigour were by no means forgotten iu the most ancient systems of education with which we are acquainted. Perhaps it may be asserted, that, in practice^ the ancients succeeded much better than the moderns in rearing robust and vi- gorous children : but they attended less to theory thsLii practice J they attained the end without hav- ing just philosophical ideas respecting the jnearis ; and sometimes indeed by methods which neither the habits nor the opinions of modern nations would admit. But the eighteenth century gave birth to more 'speculation and writing on this sub- ject than any former age could boast. The philo- sophy of physical education has been more stu- died, discussed, and understood. And though the luxury, the various premature indulgences, and the general habits of youth at the present day. 126 Education. [Chap. XXV. may be considered as peculiarly unfriendly to health and long life, yet it is certain, that, within a few years past, the inquiries on this subject, and the theoretical and practical works in relation to it published, have been more numerous, more enlightened, and more conducive, so far as re-* duced to practice, to the union of health, delica- cy, and virtue, than the wisdom of former ages produced *. But perhaps one of the most striking peculiari- ties of the eighteenth century, on the score of education, is the change of opinion gradually in- troduced into society respecting the importance, capacity, and dignity, oiihe female sex, and the consequent changes in the objects, mode, and ex- tent of their instruction. It is much less than a hundred years since female education v»'as lamen- tably, and upon principle, neglected tliroughout the civilised world. Until the age under review, " no nation, ancient or modern, esteemed it an object of public importance ; no philosopher or legislator interwove it with his system of general instruction 5 nor did any writer deem it a subject "worthy of full and serious discussion. Many sys- tems of instruction have been adopted for the. other sex, various as the countries, the govern- * Some of the Tiiethods employed by the ancients, for promo- ting the expansion, vigour, and longevity, of the human body, ■svere by no means consistent w^ith delicacy or virtue, especially in the case of the female sex. In modern times, by more care.- fully studying and more generally understanding the philosophy of diet, exercise, air, dress, and general regimen, the improvers of physical education have been enabled to do much in a way iiitogetiier cou^isteat both A^ith decorum and pure morals. Chap. XXV.] Education. 127 ment, tlie religion, the climate, and even as the caprices of the writers who at diilerent periods have undertaken to, compose them. But, by a' strange fatality, women have been almost wholly omitteil in the account, as if they were not gifted with reason and understanding, but were only to be valued for the elegance of their manners, the symmetry of their forms, and the power of their blandishments." In the history of the earliest na- tions, we occasionally meet indeed with accounts of females who had elevated and pov/erful minds, and who were well informed for tlie period in which they lived. In the history of Europe, dur- ing the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, we also fmd a ^qw instances of distinguished wonicn» some of whom, in talents, learning, and virtue, have perhaps never been excelled since that pe- riod : but the number of this description was so inconsiderable, the circumstances in which they v/ere placed were so peculiar, and the influence of their character and example so small, that they scarcely form exceptions to the general statement which has been given. The great mass of the sex still remained unacquainted with letters and sci- ence ; their whole attention being directed either to the allurements of personal decoration, or tt* the details of domestic economy. The eighteenth century produced a memorable change of opinion aud of practice on this subject. The character and talents of the female sex have become during this period more highly esti- mated, their importance in society better under- stood, and the means of rendering their salutary influence more familiarly known and adopted 5 I2S Education. [CllAP. XXV. in short, a revolution radical and unprecedented, with respect to their treatment and character, has taken place, and M^rought very perceptible effects in society. Female education has been more an object of attention, and been conducted upon more liberal principles within the last thirty years, in every cultivated part of Europe, and in America, than at any former period. Some of the ablest pens have been employed in prescribing plans for the cultivation of their minds ; semina- ries of learning, particularly adapted to their ad- vantage, have been instituted ; women have of course become, in general, better informed ; the sex has furnished more instances of learning and talents than ever before; a female of elevated un- derstanding, and of respectable literary acquire- ments, is no longer a wonderful phenomenon. Corresponding to the increase of cultivation be- stowed upon them, they have risen higher in the scale of intellect, and evinced a capacity to vie with the other sex in literature, as well as moral excellence. In a word, at the close of the eigh- teenth century it had become as rare and disgrace- ful for a woman to be ignorant, within certain limits, as at the commencement of it such igno- rance was common. As there is no truth more generally admitted, than that every step in the progress of civilisation brinsrs new honour to the female sex, and increases their importance in society; so there is, perhaps, no fact which better establishes the claim of the eighteenth century to much progress in kno\yledge and refinement, than the improvements in female education to v.hich it has given rise. It is a pro- Chap. XXV.] Education. 129 minent feature in the age, and forms one of its sig- nal honours, that its close found the fe-male sex, through a great part of the civilised world, naore generally imbued with the elements of literature and science, than they ever before were since the creation. The learning of the female world, in the period under review^ i^i^}^ be considered as bearing some peculiarity of character. What might have been the nature or extent of the attainments made by literary women in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, we are scarcely qualified to judge j but the learned women of Europe, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, according to the fashion of the day, entered deeply into the study of an- cient languages* ; they chiefly belonged to the higher ranks of life; and as writing and publish- ing were comparatively rare among all classes, so few females presented themselves before the pub- lic in this manner. lu the eighteenth century * Lady Jane Gray, who lived in the sixteenth centun", was a proficient in classic literature. " She had attained a familiar knowledge of the Latin and Greek languages, beside modern tongues; had passed most of her time in an application to learn- ing, and expressed a great indifierence for other occupations and amusements usual with her sex and station. Roger Ascham, having one day paid her a visit, found her employed in reading Plato, while the rest of the family were engaged in hunting in the park ; and on his admiring the singularity of her choice, she told him that she received more pleasure from that author than the others could reap from all their sport and gayety.'' Hume. Queen Elizabeth was no less remarkable for her learn- ing. She is said to have spoken both Greek and Latin with rea- diness, and to have been familiarly acquainted with the French, Italian, and Spanish languages. Other instances of the same kind might be adduced as belonging to that «ge. Vol. in. K 130 Education. [CHAt>. XXV. the character of female learning hecame materi- ally different. Literary females, during this pe- riod, paid more attention to general knowledge, not omitting some of the practical branches of physical science. In studying languages, they devoted themselves more particularly to modern tongues, especially the French, Italian, and Ger- man*. Literature has descended from females of high rank to those in the middle walks of life, and is perhaps, on the whole, more frequent among the latter than the former. And while learned women of former times wrote and published little, those of thaf^sex who have lately gained literary distinction have been the authors of numerous and valuable publications j-, some of which will doubtless descend with honour to posterit3^ * Afew females of the eighteenth century distinguished them- selves by their profound and accurate acquaintance with the Latin and Greek classics. The names of madame Dacier, Mrs. Crierson, Mrs. Carter, and a few others, will be remembered with respect as long as the ancient languages are studied. But there was certainly less disposition among the literary females of the eighteenth century to devote themselves to this pursuit than among those of the two preceding centuries. f " In this country," (England) says Mr. Polwhele, in his JJnsex'd Females, " a female author was formerly esteemed a phenomenon in literature; and she was sure of a favourable re- ception among the critics, in consideration of her sex. This soecies of gallantry, however, conveyed no compliment to her understanding. It implied such an inferiority of women in the scale of intellect as was justly humiliating; and critical for- bearance was mortifying to female vanity. At the present day, indeed, our literary women are so Huirrcrous, that their judges, waving all complimentary civilities, decide upon their merits with the same rigid impartiality as it seems right to exercise to- w:ards the men. The tribunal of criticism is ne longer charmed Chap. XXV.] Education. 131 Tliis revolution has been gradually elTccted, and was produced by a variety of causes. The progress of refinement, while it raised the female character, naturally placed that sex in a situation more favourable to the acquisition of knowledge. The unexampled diifusion of a taste for literature through the various ranks of society could scarce!}'' fail of increasing the intelligence, and meliorating tlie education, of females among the rest. Added to these considerations, the example and the writings of some celebrated women served to excite emulation, and to produce a thirst for knowledge among many others of their sex j these latter, again, within the sphere of their influence, produced the same good eftects on their associates; academies for the particular instruction of females soon became popular j and thus, within the last fifty years, their literary interests have been con- stantly gaining ground. , ^ Among the numerous females, whose names might be mentioned as having contributed to this revolution by their example and their writings, particular distinction is due to Mrs. Coc'kburn *, Mrs. Carter f , Mrs. Barbauld, Mrs. Lennox, Airs. Montague, Mrs. Macaulay Graham, Mrs.Cha- iuto complacence by the blushes of modest apprehension. It no longer imagines the pleading eye of feaunine diffidence, that speaks a consciousness of comparative imbecility, or afeurfulness of haying oH'ended by intrusion." *' An acute and celebrated metaphysician, who died in 1749. Her works have been since printed in two volumes octavo. t Elizabeth Carter, a lady of great erudition, and of distin- guished talents. H^ translation oiEpktctm j& generally known. 132 Education. [Chap. XXV. pone, Mrs. Ratlcliffe, miss Hannah More, miss Seward, Mrs. d'Arblay, Mrs. Charlotte Smith, miss Edgeworth, miss Hamilton, miss Wakefield, and many others, of Great Britain; Mrs. Grierson *, and ^Irs. Sheridan, of Ireland ; madame Dacier, and madame Chatelet f , of France ; together with many more J, worthy of respectful notice. The extension and improvement of female edu- cation has also been promoted by the writings of archbishop Fenelon, Dr. Gregory, Dr. Fordyce, Mr. Bennet, Dr. Darwin, and some others. Even the celebrated work of Rousseau has contributed to this end, notwithstanding the visionary and erroneous principles with which it abounds. But while female talents have been more justly appreciated, and more generally improved, espe- * Mrs. Constantia Grierson descended from very poor and il- literate parents, in the county of Kilkenny, in Ireland. She waaH born in the year 1706, and died in 1733, in the 27th year of her age. She was profoundly acquainted with Grecian and Roman literature; published editions of Terence and Tacitus, which are among the best extant; and addressed an elegant Greek epigram to the son of lord Carteret, by whose influence her husband pro- cured a patent to be the king's printer for Ireland, on condition that the life and character of Mrs. Grierson should be inserted in it, as a monument in honour of her learning. f The numerous and profound works of madame Dacier, in classic literature, are well known ; as are also the talents and learn ing of madame du Chatelet, the able commentator on Newton, t To this list may be added the names of the margravine of Anspach, Mrs. Dobson, Mrs. Brooke, Mrs. Cowley, Mrs. Years- ley, Mrs. Inchbald, Mrs. West, miss Lee, Mrs. Trimmer, miss H. M. Williams, and several others, distinguished in the walks of polite literature; and also the honourable Mrs. Darner, Mrs. Francis, and Mrs. Thomas, celebrated for their acquirements in the ancient languages. Chap. XXV.] Educatioju 133 cially during the latter half of the eighteenth cen- tury, certain extravagant and mischievous d()C- trines relating to that sex have arisen within this period, and obtained considerable currency. These doctrines are the following, viz. " That there is no difference between the powers and tendencies of the male and female mind ; that women are as capable of performing, and as fit to perform, all the duties and offices of life, as men; that their education should be the same with that of the men ; in a word, that, except in the business of love, all distinctions of sex should be forgotten and confounded." These opinions, if not wholly new, and peculiar to the last age, have doubtless obtained a currency, within a few years past, which they never before had, and which has produced much interesting discussion, and very sensible eilects in society. The most conspicuous advocate of these opi- nions is the celebrated Mary Wollstonecraft, whose ingenious vindication of the Rights of JVo- man is universally known. In her principles on this subject she has been followed by several of her own sex, as well as by a few male writers. To the former class belongs Mary Hays, who, in her Novels and Philosophical Disquisitions, has en- deavoured, with great art and plausibility, to re- commend the principles of this mischievous school. It cannot be denied, that a total mistake con- cerning the capacity and importance of the female sex has long held that part of our species under a very degrading thraldom, and obscured the por- tion of intellectual and moral excellence, which 134 Education. [Chap. XXV. they possess. It may also \\'\\\\ truth be granted, that the idea of an o^'zoZ/za/ difference between the mental characters and powers of the two sexes has been pushed greatly too far, and been made a source of long-continued ancl essential injury to women. Females, if it were practicable or proper to give them, in all respects, the same education as that bestowed on men, would probably discover nearly equal talents, and exhibit little difference in their intellectual structure and energies. But is it possible, or consistent with the obvious in- dications of nature, to give them precisdij the same education as is given to the male part of our species ? That this is neither practicable nor de- sirable will appear from the following considera^ lions. First. Women are obviously destined to dife- rent employments and pursuits from men. This i^ evident from various considerations. Among all the classes of animals with which we are acquaint- ed, the female is smaller, weaker, and usually more timid than the male. This fact cannot be ascribed to difference of education, to accident, or to per- verted systems of living among the inferior ani- mals; for it is uniform, and nearly, if not entirely, universal, applying to all countries, climates, ant} situations ; and if ever we may expect to find na- ture pure and unperverted, it must be among the brutal tribes. The same fact applies to the hu- man species. The bodies of women in gene- ral are smaller and feebler than those of men, and they are commonly more timid. This is not merely the case in the more polished states of society, in which false refmcment, or injurious CllAP. XXV.] Education. 135 iiabits, may be supposed to have degraded the fe- male character ; but it is nearly if not equally so among savages, where women, instead of being wholly or chiefly sedentary, are rather the more laborious sex. How shall we account for this fact ? Does it not seem to indicate a difference of em- ployment and destination? Is it conceivable that there should be so much difference of structure between beings intended for precisely the same sphere of action F No one can suppose this, who believes that the various departments of nature are all formed by a Being of infinite wisdom, and that in the economy of creation and providence means are adjusted to ends. Again ; the important offices of gestation and parturition being assigned to women, plainly point out the difference of situation, pursuit, and employment, for which we are contending. The various circumstances of infirmity and confine- ment resulting from these offices present insur- mountable obstacles in the way of that sex en- gaging in many employments destined for men. If all distinctions, except in the business of love, ought to be confounded, then females ought to be called to sit on the bench of Justice, to fill the seats of legislation, to hold the reins of executive office, and to lead the train of war. But would such a kind of activity as any of these stations suppose, comport with their sexual duties ? The slightest reflexion, it is presumed, will be sufli- cient to convince every unprejudiced inquirer, tiiat there is a total incompatibility between them. Secondly J To meike the education and the em- 136 Education. [Chap. XXV. ployments of the two sexes precisely the same, would, if practicable in itself, be productive of the most immoral consequences. Let us suppose young females to mingle promiscuously with the youth of the other sex, in their studies, in their amusements, and in all the means adopted to Strengthen the bodies and the minds of each. Let us suppose, that after the elements of knowledge were acquired, the same employments Avere as- signed to each sex. Let us suppose the various stations of civil trust to be filled indifferently by men and women ; the places destined for the in- struction of lawyers, physicians, and surgeons, to be occupied by a jumbled crowd of male and fe- male students; the clerkships in counting-houses, and public offices, executed by a joint corps of male and female penmen ; and the bands of la- bourers in manufactories formed without any distinction of sex. What would be the conse- quence of these arrangements } It would con- vert society into hordes of seducers and prosti- tutes. Instead of the regularity, the order, the pleasing charities, and the pure delights of wed- ded love, a s^^stem of universal concubinage would prevail. Seminaries of learning would be changed into nurseries of licentiousness and dis- ease y the proceedings of deliberative assemblies w^ould be perverted or arrested by the wiles of amorous intrigue; the places of commercial or mechanical business would become the haunts of noisy and restless lewdness ; and all sober em- ployment would yield to the dominion of brutal appetite. Let us take a retrospect of those countries and Chap. XXV.] Education. 137 ages, in which the intercouse of the sexes, with respect to violations of what are commonly call- ed the laws of decorum, came nearest to the point of freedom here recommended- In the ancient gymnastic exercises, it is well known, that the young women were obliged to run, to wrestle, to throw quoits, &c., and in these exercises to ap- pear naked, as well as the men ; and at their feasts and sacrifices, they were also obliged to dance, in the same state of perfect nudity, amid crowds of male spectators. AV^hat was the con- sequence of these proceedings ? According to the doctrine under consideration, such freedom in exposing the naked limbs, and those parts of the body which are generally concealed, ought to have rendered the people who indulged in these habits the most virtuous in the world, Avith re- gard to the intercourse of the sexes. But was this really the consequence ? Directly the re- verse ! The exercises in question were converted into occasions of wantonness and libertinism, so gross and flagitious, that they became subjects of universal complaint, and filled even pagans with horrour. The truth is, wherever the intercourse of the sexes has been most guarded, and the fences of delicacy and modesty most carefully kept up, there the highest degree of virtue and order has inva^ riably prevailed. It is so far from being a correct opinion, that throwing off reserve is the best way |;o prevent corruption, that uniform experience proves this course to be the most mischievous and corrupting that can be imaglhed. There is no way of avoiding this consequence, but by main- 138 Education. [Chap. XXV, tainin*, that maii}^ things which Christianity, and those who take their standard of morality from it, pronounce vicious, are really innocent, if not laudable. Thirdly 5 To defend the system which would confound all distinctions of sex, except in the business of love, is as opposite to the spirit of Ciiristianity, as it is inconsistent w^ith the pur- suits of the female sex, and immoral in its conse- quences. Those who are familiar with the scrip- tures will recollect, that a line of distinction be- tween the sexes is frequently and carefully drawn therein, and an habitual reference to this distinc- tion represented as highly important in the system of human duty. Upon this distinction, consider- ed in several points of view, are founded some of the most interesting conjugal obligations, and all the leading principles of domestic government. The scriptures indeed do not exhibit w^oman as an enslaved and servile being; they represent }ver as a rational and immortal creature, as the counsellor, companion, and helpmate of men, and teach us, both by precept and example, to consider her as holding a high and respectable station in society: but they exclude her, by di- rect prohibition, from the office of public reli- gious instructor, and plainly intimate, that seve- ral other eniployments and pursuits are unfit to engage her attention. In short, they distinctly and unequivocally hold up the idea of an appro- priate sexual character, and represent a corre- sponding peculiarity of studies and action as pro- perly belonging to the male and female. ; It is Evident then, from reason, from the uiiin GiiAP. XXV.] Education. 139 form course of nature, from experience, and from the word of God, that females are destined for different pursuits and employments from men, and that the sphere of their activity should be diffe- rent. This, of consequence, will call for a diffe- rent education, will lead to different habits, and yvill give rise to distinguishing characteristics. Do not the professional employments of men every day beget observable peculiarities of character and taste ? And is it not perfectly natural, on the same principle, that there should be sexual pecu- liarities ? Nor is there any necessity for supposing a radical inferiority of intellectual power in fe- males. It will be readily granted, that with the same kind, and with the same degree, of cultiva- tion with men, they would exhibit equal capacity of mind. But the necessary reserve of the female sex, their domestic duties, their sedentary life, the infirmities and confmement resulting from the pe- culiar sexual oflices before alluded to, and the va- rious peculiarities of their situation, are abun- dantly sufficient to produce in them a different genius and character of mind from those of men, whose active employments, daring enterprises, aspiring ambition, diversified scenes and occupa- tions, familiarity with danger, and unceasing la- bours to gain fame, wealth, or pleasure, impart to their minds a vigour, a courage, a solidity, a wa- riness, and a persevering patience in exertion, which are rarely found in wpmeu *. * Miss Ilaunali IMore, in one of her Essays, seems to admit the idea of an ori'^inal inferiority of mental character in females. She expresses herself in this manner : " Women have generally tjuicker perceptions ; men have justcr sentiments. Women cpa» 140 Education. [Chap. XXV. What, then, is the conclusion of the matter? It is, that women, as well as men, are rational beings ; that they are made not to be the servants but the companions of men ; that for this purpose, where it is practicable, their minds should be cultivated with care, liberally imbued with know- ledge, and so strengthened and polished as to fit them to shine, not only in the routine of domestic employments, but also in the social circle, and in literary conversation. Every man who under- stands the true interests of society will desire to slder how things may be prettily said ; men, how they may be properly said. Women speak, to shine or please ; men, to con- vince, on confute. Women admire what is brilliant; men, what is solid. Women prefer a sparkling effusion of fancy to the most laborious investigation of facts. In literary composition, women are pleased with antithesis ; men, with observation and a just deduction of effects from their causes. In Romance and Novel- writing women cannot be excelled. To amuse, rather than to instruct, or to ilistruct indirectly, by short inferences drawn from a long concatenation of circumstances, is at once the busi- ness of this sort of composition, and one of the characteristics of fenriale genius. In short, it appears, that the mind, in each vsex, has some natural kind of bias, which constitutes a distinc- tion of character ; and that the happiness of both depends, in a great measure, on the preservation and observance of this di- stinction."— Essay, p. 9 — 13. In the sentiment here expressed, I cannot altogether agree with this excellent and illustrious wo- man. That there is some such difference as she has stated be- tween the sexes, I am ready to allow ; but this appears to me to arise not so much from any original inferiority in the structure of the female mind, as from a difference of education a»d employ- ment; from a difference in the circumstances in which women are placed in society, with respect to inducements to action, the nature of their amusements, b;c. ; a difference which is neces- ssiy and proper, and which to set aside, would be to derange the order, and destroy the happiness of society. Ghap. XXV.] Education. 141 see females receive the best education which their circumstances will afford. And every one who considers the importance of enlightening and forming the minds of the young, and who recol- lects that this task must, for a number of the first years of life, be almost entirely intrusted to mothers, will perceive the propriety of having them more accurately and extensively informed than they commonly are. But when women carry the idea of their equality with the other sex so far as to insist, that there should be no difference m their education and pursuits; when they con- tend that every kind of study or occupation is equally fit and desirable for them to pursue as for men * ; when they imagine and act on the presumption, that they have talents as well suited to every species of employment and enterprise; they mistake both their character, their dignity, and their happiness. The God of nature has raised everlasting barriers against such wild and mischievous claims. To urge them is to renounce * It is by no means the intention of the writer to say, that the profound investigations of mathematical or metaphysical science are unfit for all females. Where persons of this sex are so circum- stanced, with regard to property and employment, as to render investigations of this kind convenient and agreeable, there a|:- pears no rational objection to their engaging in them. But when females devote themselves to studies of this nature, to the neg- lect of religious and moral improvement, which are indispensa- bly necessary for every sex and age ; and to the omission also of geography, history, chemistry, and some of the more attrac- tive branches of natural history, if they do not depart from the province of their sex, they certainly have a singular taste as to what is most useful and most ornamental in females, situate as they are in society. 142 Education. [Chap. XXV, reason ; to contradict experience ; to trample on the divine authority ; and to diminish the useful- ness, the respectabilit}', and the real enjoyment of the female sex. The increased intelligence and the taste for readnig, which remarkably characterise the fe- male sex of the present day, compared with their condition a century ago, are attended with some circumstances, which the friends of virtue and happiness cannot contemplate with unmingled pleasure. By far too great a portion of the read- ing of females is directed to Novels, and other pro- ductions of light and frivolous character, which at best can only amuse, and which often exert a corrupt influence, instead of enlightening the mind, and forming it to a love of wisdom and virtue. Hence the frequent complaint, among the sober and discerning, that modern female education is calculated to make superficial, as- suming, and dissipated, rather than wise and use- ful women ; and that they have just learning enough to detach them from the peculiar and proper duties of their sex, but not sufficient to expand, enrich, and regulate their minds. This complaint has, doubtless, some foundation *. But * If the statement given in a former page, respecting the cha- racter and destination of the finale sex, be just, then engaging in literary pursuits of such a kind, or to such a degree, as will render them either unfit or indisposed to act in their peculiar domestic sphere, is, in ordinary cases, unwise and mischievous. This remark applies with particular force to that kind of read- ing, which has a tendency to consume time, without conferring a single advantage of solid information, or of real wisdom. Those young ladiea who, instead of studying theology, morals, gram- Chap. XXV.] Education. 143 instead of proving that a taste for literature is improper or injurious in females, it only serves to admonish us, that their studies should be morq extensive and better directed ; that an acquaint- ance with novels only will never make any wo- man a good housewife, mother, friend, or Chris- tian J and that literature in them, as ^vell as the other sex, though in itself an invaluable blessing, may be perverted into a heavy curse. The elegant accomplishments of music and draiving were also more commonly made a part of female education, at the close of the eighteenth century, than at any former period with the his- tory of which we are acquainted. We now see every day, in the houses of those who belong to the middle class of society, instruments of music, and productions of the pencil, which a century ago were rarely seen in the houses of the most conspicuous and wealthy. This increase of atten- tion to music, as a part of female education, dur- ing the last century, is more especially remark- able in Great Britain and America. On the subject oi Education, the centur}^ under review has given birth to a doctrine, which, though noticed in a former chapter, is yet too re- markable and too pregnant with mischief, to be suffered to pass without more particujlar conside- ration in the present. It is, that education has a kind of intellectual and moral omnipotence ; that mar, geography, historj% chemistry, ^'c, give all their reading- hours to Novels, would do well to ask themselves, how far this kind of employment is likely to qualify them to be dignified heads of families, respectable companions of their husbands, or u^sful members of society. 144 Education. [Chap. XXV. to its different forms are to be ascribed the chief, if not all, the differences observable in fiie ge- nius, talents, and dispositions of men 5 and that by improving its principles and plan, human na- ture mav, and finally will, reach a state of ab- solute perfection in this world, or at l^ast go on to a state of unlimited improvement. In short, in the estimation of those who adopt this doc- trine, man is the child of circumstances ; and by meliorating these, without the aid of religion, his true and highest elevation is to be obtained : and they even go so far as to believe, that, by means of the advancement of light and knowledge, all vice, misery, and death, may finally be banished from the earth. This system, as was before ob- served, seems to have been first distinctly taught by M. Helvetius, a celebrated French author who wrote about the middle of the age we are consi- dering, and was afterwards adopted and urged with great zeal by many of his countrymen, par- ticularly Mirabaud and Condorcet ; and also by Mr. Godwin, and others, of Great Britain. This doctrine of the omnipotence of education, and the perfectibility of man, seems liable, among many others, to the following strong objec- tions : — First. It is contrary to the nature and condition of man. Though every succeeding generation may be said, with respect to literary and scien- tific acquisitions, to stand on the ground gained by their predecessors, and thus to be continually making progress; yet this is by no means the case with regard to intellectual discipline and mo- ral qualities. Each successive individual, how- Chap. XXV.] Educatio?!. 145 ever elevated tlie genius, and- however subjime the virtues of his ancestors, has to perform the task of restraining his own appetites, subduing his own passions, and guarding against the ex- cesses to which his irregular propensities would prompt him. Suppose a Bacon, or a Newton, after all his intellectual and moral attainments, to have a son. Is this son more wise or more vir- tuous, on account of the genius and attainments of his parent ? By no means. He has the samQ laborious process to undergo, for the acquisition of knowledge, and thj same vigilance and patient self-denial to exercise, for the regulation of his moral character, as if his parent had been the most ignorant and degraded of beings. And this, from the nature and condition of man, must al- ways continue to be the case. If every succes- sive individual of our species must come into the world ignorant, feeble, and helpless j and if the same process for instilling knowledge into the mind, and restraining moral irregularities, must be undergone, dc ?iovo, in every instance, on what do these sanguine calculators rest their hopes that we shall attain a state of intellectual and moral perfection in the present world ? They must sup- pose either that the propagation of the species, by the intercourse of the sexes, will cease ; or that, contrary to every law, man will at length come into the world with all that maturity of reason, light, and information, which belongs to adult years. But it is presumed neither of these suj> positions will be adopted by rational inquirers. Secondly. Another objection to this doctrine is, that it is contrary to all experience. The world Vol. m. L 146 Education. [Chap. XXV has existed near six thousand years ; and, during this long period, the exertions of intellect and of virtue have been numerous and great. It will even be readily granted, that, amidst the mortify- ing vicissitudes and the degrading retrocessions which the history of knowledge presents, man- kind are now far more enlightened than at any former period. But is it a fact, that real wisdom, moral purity, and true happiness, have always kept pace with the improvements in literature and science ? Are the most learned and scientific na- tions, and the most learned and scientific indivi- duals, always the most virtuous? Are luxury, fraud, violence, unprincipled ambition, the vi- cious intercourse of the sexes, and the various kinds of intemperance, less frequent among the polished and enlightened nations of Europe, than among the untutored natives of America.^ It is presumed that no reflecting mind will answer these questions in the affirmative. What, then, becomes of the fundamental principle of those ivho hold the doctrine in question ; viz. That the progress of knowledge is alone sufficient to re- form, exalt, and finally to render perfect, the hu- man race ? If this principle were well founded, we should find virtue and happiness, both in indi- viduals and societies, bearing an exact proportion to the advances made in knowledge, which expe- rience attests is far from being the case. But it will perhaps be said, that the principle o^ experience may be pressed too farj that it is not legitimate reasoning to infer, because an event has never yet occurred, that therefore it never can or will take place. But if a certain Chap. XXV.] Education. 147 cause produce a given effect, there must be a ten^ dency in that cause to produce this effect. Now, if this tendency be real, when the cause is exerted in a certain degree, the effect may generally, if not always, be looked for in a corresponding de- gree. But if it be not generally true, that the most enlightened are the most virtuous ; if it be noi generally true, that in proportion as men make progress in intellectual improvement, they make progress in moral excellence j we may with con- fidence conclude, that these two species of im- provement do not necessarily stand in the relation of cause and effect to each other, and, therefore, that from the existence of the former, we cannot legitimately infer the existence of the latter. Thirdly. A further objection to the doctrine of human perfectibility has been drawn, with great force, from the principle oi population, compared with the means of subsistence. It has been asserted by acute and well informed writers, that the pro- gress oi population y when unrestrained, is always in 3i geometrical ratio, and that the increase of the means of subsistence is, under the most favourable circumstances, only in an arithmetical ratio. If this be the case, it is evident that the progress of population must continually, unless in extraordi- nary circumstances, be checked by the want of subsistence; that these two will ever be, from their very nature, contending forces, and will be found more or less, in the most advantageous states of society, to produce want, fraud, violence, irregularity in the sexual intercourse^ disease, and various kinds of vice; and, as the natural conse- quence of these, especially in their combined JL2 148 Education. [Chap. XXV. force, much misery and degradation to man. There seems to be no method of avoiding this con- chision, but by contending, that, when knowledge shail have made a certain degree of progress, both the intercourse of the sexes and the necessity of food and raiment will cease. But will any one seriously maintain that such events are probable ? Do we actually see individuals or communities, as they advance in learning and refinement, discover less propensity to the sexual intercourse, or a greater disposition or ability to do without the means of bodily sustenance ? It will not be pre- tended that either of these is the case. But as long as the propagation of the human species continues to stand on the footing and to depend on the prin- ciples which it now does ; and as long as food and raiment are necessary as means of subsistence, hu- man society must be doomed to exhibit more or less of ignorance, vice, and misery *. Fourthly. It is evident that the doctrine of the unlimited efficacy of education, and the perfectly bility of man, is wholly inconsistent with the scrip- ture account of the creation and present state of man. The sacred volume teaches us that we are fallen and depraved beings ; that this depravity is total, and admits of no remedy but by the grace declared in the Gospel ; that the most virtuous will never be perfect or completely holy in the present world, and that misery and death are the * See this argument placed in a strong and interesting point of light in a work entilled An Essay on Population, by Mr. Malthus, which, in force of reasoning, and in can- dour and urbanity of discussion, has rai'ely if ever beien' ex- ceeded. OjriQL"i Chap. XX^^j Education. 149 iin^ivoidable lot of man while under the present dispensation. It is true, the same scriptures speak of a future period of iiullennial happiness and glory, when divine knowledge shall universally abound, and when peace and happbiess shall fill the 'World. But the Millennium of the Bible dif- fers essentially, both in its caust and nature^ from the period which the advocates of this philosophy y falsely so • called *, describe in such glowing co- lours, aiid expect with so much confidence. The believers in the former expect it to be produced by the prevalence of that divine illumination, and that evangelical holiness, \\'hich have already been found so transcendently efficacious in promoting the virtue and happiness of men, notwithstanding the obstacles which have stood in the way of their benign operation j while Helvetius, Condorcet, Gqdwin, and their disciples, expect every thing to be ; accomplished, by the progress of knowledge, which has been so thoroughly tried, and proved so lamentably ineffectual . The Millennium of scripture is represented as a period of knowledge, benevolence, peace, purity, and universal holi- ness ; but the millennium depicted in philosophic xlreams is an absurd portrait of knowledge with- out real wisdom, of benevolence without piety, and of purity and happiness without genuine virtue. It will be readily granted, indeed, to the advo- cates of this delusive system, that education is ex- * It, is to be regretted that the word philosophy, so noble and elevated in its original and only proper meaning, should be so often prostituted by an application to the reveries of pride, igno- rance, and vanity. 150 Education. [Chap. XXV. tremely powerful j that much of the diiference w^ observe m the talents and dispositions of men is to be ascribed to its eilicacy; and that the lovers of knowledge may be expected hereafter to make such improvements in literature, such discoveries in science, and such useful reforms in the plans of instruction, as exceedingly to promote the ge- neral improvement of man. But before the doc- trine of perfectibility can be adopted, the nature of man must be totally changed ; his present ha- bits and wants must cease ; and he must become a being of an essentially different character from that which his Creator has given him. The hus-- bandman, by skilful and patient culture, may highly improve the quality of many species of the vegetable tribes. Pie may cause that which, in a neglected spot, was small, feeble, and unpromi- sing, to become, in more favourable circum- stances, vigorous, luxuriant, and flourishing : in short, it is not easy to say how far, under enlight- ened and vmwearied cultivation, he may carry the improvement of those objects to which he devotes his attention. But to suppose that there are no limits to this improvement; to suppose that under the wisest management a rose might be so ex* panded as to cover a field of many acres, or a stalk of wheat so enlarged as to vie with the oak of the forestj would surely be the height of extra- vagance and folly *. The doctriae of human perfectihiUty^ however, is too flattering to the pride of man not to have considerable currency among certain classes of * See the 'Esmy on Population before quoted. Chap. XXV.] Education, 151 society. Accordingly, the effects of tliis doctrine may be distinctly traced in many parts of the ci- vilised world, from its influence in seminaries of learning, on the general interests of education, and on many social institutions. That this influ- ence is unfavourable, will not be questioned for a moment by those who consider truth and utility as inseparably arid eternally connected. From the foregoing remarks it appears that education, in the course of the eighteenth cen- tury, underwent important revolutions. That so far as respects the extension of its benefits in a greater degree to the female sex, and to almost every rank in society; the multiplication of se- minaries of learning, of popular elementary works for the use of youth, and of the various means and excitements to the acquisition of knowledge ; and the decline of that despotic reign which the dead languages held for three preceding centu- ries, we may look back on the period under con- sideration as a period of honourable improve- ment : but that in some other respects, and par- ticularly with respect to the patient, laborious, and thorough investigation of the various objects of knowledge ; the depth of erudition ; the disci- pline and subordination of academic establish- ments ; and the general moral influence of lite- rary and scientific acquirements ; the last age can- not with propriety boast of much progress. 152 CHAPTER XXVI. NATIONS LATELY BECOME LITERARY. X HE last century is not only distinguished by numerous discoveries, and by rich additions to the general stock of science, but also by the rise of several nations from obscurity in the republic of letters, to considerable literary and scientific eminence. To attempt to give a full view of the commencement and progress of a taste for jlitera-^ ture in those nations would lead to a minuteness and extent of discussion altogether beyond the li- mits of our plan. The design of the present chap- ter, therefore, is only to state some general factSj, and to connect with them such names and colla- teral events as may appear to demand notice, ei- ther for the purpose of throwing light on the prin- cipal object of inquiry, or of doing honour to me- ritorious individuals. In the list about to be given of new literary countries, it will not be possible, for various reasons, to include all that might with propriety be mentioned. Passing by several na- tions, therefore, of inferior character, the most important of those which in the last century have become literary are Russia, Ge?i?iamj, and the United States of America. To each of these some attention will be separately directed. Sect. I.] Nations lately become Literar^» 153 SECTION I. RUSSIA. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, Russia had scarcely a literary existence. Almost entirely without learned men, and destitute of the means of acquiring knowledge, the whole empire may be said, with little exception, to have been sunk in ignorance and barbarism. The language of the country was in a miserably confused and chaotic state, without rules, and with scarcely any fixed character; and of course no writers of taste in that language had appeared. It is true, the art of printing was introduced into Russia as early as the sixteenth century, and some feeble efforts were made, about the same time, to en- lighten and civilise the people. Efforts still more vigorous and extensive, to effect the same pur- pose, were made in the seventeenth century ; but they were soon relaxed, and little was done in this way until Peter the Great ascended the im- perial throne. The crown devolving on Peter, at the close of the seventeenth century, he early formed the de- sign of introducing into his empire, as far as pos- sible, the various arts of civilised life, and that attention to letters and science which he found to be so useful in other nations. For this purpose he travelled into foreign countries ; made himself acquainted with their literary and scientific insti- 154 Kations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. tutions ; sent some of the most conspicuous young noblemen in his dominions into different parts of Europe, for the purpose of improving themselves in literature ; and invited many foreigners of dis- tinction to settle at his court. He established a printing office in Petersburg, for publishing books in the vulgar tongue; and among many other works caused a large edition of the Bible in that language to be printed and scattered through his dominions. He instituted also, beside schools of less celebrity, in different parts of the empire, a mathematical school, a seminary for instruction in navigation, a museum for the collection of cu- riosities from all parts of the world, and an obser- vatory, for the promotion of astronomical sci- ence: in short, he endeavoured, as far as possible, to transplant from all other nations, into his own country, every thing that appeared to him orna- mental or useful. By these means he produced a taste for letters and science among some of the higher classes of his subjects, and laid the foun- dation of that general improvement in his empire, which has since risen to such an honourable height *. The establishment of the Imperial Academy of Arts and Sciences forms an important era in the history of Russian literature. This institution owes its origin to Peter the Great, who, during his travels, observing the advantages of public societies for the promotion of useful knowledge, * For more juinute information on the subject of Russian li- terature than it is convenient to give in the present sketch, see Coxe's Travels, and Tooke's Survey of the Russian Empire, his History of Russia, and his Life of Catharine JI. Sect. I.] Russia. 155 determined to form an association of this kind in his own country* For this purpose, when in Ger- many, he consulted Leibnitz and Wolf, and avail- ed himself of their learning and experience in the formation of his plan. With their aid he at length completed the constitution of the Academy^ and signed it on the tenth of February, 1 724, but was prevented by his sudden death from putting it into effective operation. His decease, however, did not defeat the laudable and well formed de- sign. The academy was established by Catha* rine I on the twenty first of December, 1 725, and the first meeting took place two days aftervv'ards. This empress not only favoured the institution, but also exercised great munificence towards it. She made a liberal grant of money for the support of fifteen members eminent for learning and ta- lents, who were pensioned under the title of pro- fessors in the various branches of literature and science. And that nothing might be omitted which could promote her leading object, she in- vited a number of eminent foreigners to Peters- burg, for the purpose of filling the professorial chairs, for which provision had been made. The most distinguished of these foreigners were Nicho- las and Daniel Bernoulli, the two de Lisles, Bul- finger. Wolf, and Euler, whose profound erudir tion and scientific industry could not fail of pro- moting the in4:erests of knowledge -vyherever they were placed. Perhaps few institutions of this mature, in mo- dern times, have been more diligent or more suc- .cessful in pursuing the objects for which it was formed than this academy, j^eside its published 166 Nations lately become ^Aiterary. [Cil, X^XVI. tratisdctidn'St M'hich amount, it is believed, to nearly fifty volumes, aiid: which are full of valu- able information both in literature and science ; its members have done much, both in their oilicial and private capacities, to diffuse almost every branch of useful knowledge throughout the em- pire. Perhaps no country can boast of having produced, within the space of a few years, stich a number of excellent publications on its internal state, its natural history, its topography, and geo- graphy ; and on the manners, customs, and lan- guages of different nations; as have iissued from the press of the academy. These exertions of Peter and Catharine werb aided by some of their native subjects, wlio began to perceive the importance of literature, ^nd to form plans for the diffusion of it among the peo- ple. It was in the reign of the former, that those improvements in the Russian or Sclavonian lan- guage commenced, which have since made such honourable progress. To Theophanes Prokopo- vitch*, archbishop of Novogorod, a man of learn- ing and taste, and a native of Russiaj much ho- nour is due, for labouring to promote among his * Theophanes Prokopovitch was born in Russia in 16SI:, and died archbishop of Novogorod in 1736. After receiving as good an ed«cation as his country afforded, he went to Rome, where he resided three yeats, and where his literary and scientific acquire- ments were greatly extended. He was profoundly learned, not only in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew literature, but also in philoso- phy and theology. He was the fjrst Russian divine who pub- lished a regular systematic view of the doctrines of his church. His principal work is composed in Latin, under the title of Chris- fktnn Orthodoxa Theologia. His discourses are deemed classical oerfcrraances. Sect. L] Bussia. 157' eoimtryinen a taste for polite literature. He not only cultivated and endeavoured to extend the influence of learning during his life, but likewise left a legacy to be applied to the same object after his decease. In this laudable zeal for promoting the lite- rary interests of his country, Theophanes was" fol- lowed by Lomonozof, who, it was before observed, has been styled the great refnicr of the Russian language*. ,His labours may be considered as forming an era in the literary progress of his country, and are always mentioned as having been eminently conducive to this progress. During the short reign of Peter II, the acade- my, and the general interests of literature, being- neglected by the court, greatly declined. The sa- laries of the professors were discontinued, and an almost universal disregard to science prevailed. When the empress Anne came to the throne, the court again patronised the cause of letters and science. She revived the academy ; enlarged the * Lomonozof was the son of a fishmonger at Kohnogori, in Russia. He Was born in the year 1711, and died in 1764, in the 54-th year of his age. He was fortunately taught to read, an ac- complishment by no means common among persons of such hum- ble origin ,in Russia. His genius for poetry was fust kindled by the perusal of the Song of Solomon, done into verse by Polotsky, in a very rude and miserable manner. He fled from his father, who would have compelled him to a. disagreeable marriage, and took refuge in a monastery at Moscow, where he had an abun- dant opportunity of indulging his taste for letters. He was after- ■svards taken under the patronage of the Imperial Acad.-iity at Peiershuri^, and proved one of the most distinguished literary characters of the age. His works were collected after his death, in three volume's octavo. ^ hdr, i\yb'^\,ii[ 158 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. provision which had been made for its most active members ; added a seminary for the instruction of youth, under the superintendence of the profes- sors ; and did much for the diffusion of liberal knowledge. Both the academy, and the semi- nary connected vv^ith it, flourished for some time under the direction of baron Korf ; but upon his death, towards the latter end of Anne's reign, a person without erudition, wisdom, or enterprise, being appointed president, many of the most able and useful members quitted Russia in disgust. At the accession of the empress Elizabeth, new life and vigour were again restored to this institu- tion; the original plan was still further enlarged and improved; some of the most learned foreigners were again drawn to Petersburg; and, what was considered a very promising omen for the litera- ture of Russia, two natives of the country, Lomo- nozof, before mentioned, and Romofsky, another man of genius and learning, were enrolled among the members of the academy. But when Catharine II came to the imperial throne, a new and illustrious era commenced. Her exertions for the encouragement of literature were more spirited and liberal than those of any of her predecessors, excepting Peter, and more extended and successful than even his. She fos- tered the academy with the utmost zeal; provided additional funds for its more ample support ; pre- vailed on a number of learned foreigners to accept of professorships in the academy, and other places of honour and profit at her court; caused the geography and natural history of her empire to be carefully explored ; and gave a new spring to Sect. I.] Russia. 159 the growth of literature and science in every part of her dominions in which they had been planted. But there were two events in the reign of Catha- rine which deserve to be particularly recorded, and which must be supposed to have had a con- siderable influence in promoting the diffusion of knowledge among her subjects. The first is, the order issued, in the year 1768, by the empress, for translathig a number of standard zvorks, in various languages, into the Russian, thereby at once improving the national tongue, and extending a knowledge of some of the best publications of taste and science through- out her empire. For defraying the expense of this undertaking she granted an annual sum, and engaged in the work some of her most learned subjects, by whose labours many of the Greek and Latin classics have been presented in a re- spectable Russian dress * ; and a nun^ber of the most valuable works in the English, French, and German languages, given to the inhabitants of that country in their own dialect. A considerable portion of these translators were natives of Russia, but the greater number were learned foreigners. The other event referred to is the establishment * Among the numerous versions made in consequence of this imperial order, the following are worthy of particular no- tice. The works of Plato, translated by Siderofsky and Pak- homof; the works o( Hesiod by Fr\'antynofsky ; Homer-'s Iliad by Yekimof ; the Mneis and Gcorgics of Virgil by Yekimof, and also by Petrof ; the Metamorphoses of Ovid by Kofitzky ; and the Odes of Horace by Popofsky. To attempt an enumeration of the English, French, and German classical works which have been naturalised in Russia, would exceed the reasonable limits of a note. 160 Nations lately become Liter an). [Cii. XXVL of normal Schools, by Catharine, in every pro- vince in her empire. This estabhshment com- menced about the year 1780, when places of in- struction were formed, not only for the children of the nobility, but also for those of inferior rank. For this object the empress did not content her- self with making ample pecuniary provision, but also caused elementary books, for the instruction of youth in religion and morals, as well as letters, to be composed or translated, and distributed throuG:hout her dominions. It is scarcely neces- sary to add, that the influence of these institutions has been benign and extensive. Beside the seminaries of learning already men- tioned, the various sovereisrns of Russia durinij the last age, and especially Catharine II, formed numerous societies for the promotion of Jrts, Ma- nufactures, and Agriculture i established Libraries, not only in Petersburg, but also in other parts of the empire; made large collections of specimens m the Fine Arts, and endeavoured, by other me- thods, to awaken the attention of an ignorant and barbarous people to the improvements of civilisa- tion, and the importance of knowledge. Perhaps it is not saying too much to pronounce, that, notwithstanding the detestable character of Catharine II, considered in a moral view, and notwithstandnig the odious despotism which she exercised, no crowned head ever did more, in the same length of time, to raise the character and promote the general welfare of her subjects. And when it is considered how low she found the greater part of these subjects sunk in ignorance and brutality at her accession to the throne^ it Sect. I.] Russia, 161 is astonishing tliat her efforts were attended with so much success. When this empress began her reign, little at- tention had been devoted to Natural Philosophy, or Natural History, in her dominions: but within a few years past, much has been done in these branches of science, by a number of persons, both natives and foreigners. Among the former, Lepe- chin, Guldenst;edt, Ozeretzkofsky, Solokof, Suyef, Rumofsky, and Florinsky, deserve to be mention- ed with particular respect. Among the latter, Pallas *, Gmelin, Falk, /Epinus, Georgi, Renovantz, and several others, hold an honourable rank. . By the labours and writings of these philosophers, a considerable taste has been excited in Russia, for the inquiries to which they directed their attention. * Peter Simon Pallas was born at Berlin in the year Mil, and is the son of a distinguished surgeon of that city. After enjoy- ing every advantage to be derived from the universities of Halle and Gottingen^ he travelled into other parts of Germany, spent some time in Holland and in England, and every where directed particular attention to natural history, beside improving himself in other branches of knowledge. He was, early in life, invited by Catharine II to Petersburg, where he was appointed profes- sor of natural history in the Imperial Academy of Sciences, and v/here he has ever since maintained a growing reputation for ta- lents and learning. Professor Pallas is probably the most ac- complished naturalist now living. Wis Elcnchus Zoophj/torum ; Ins Miscellanea Zoblogica ; his Nova; Species Qiiadnipedinn e Gli- rinm ordine ; his Enumeratio Plantarum quce in Horto Procopii a Demidof Moscua vivent ; his Neue Nordische Heytrage ; his Iconss luKectarum, S^c; and his Flora Rossica, are too well known, and too highly esteemed among natural historians, to render an ac- count of their respective merits necessary. This great man now resides in Crim Tartary, on an estate granted him by the empress, where, in the enjoyment of dignified leisure, he devotes himself to his favourite pursuits. Vol. III. M 162 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI, In Mathematical Science y Kotelnikof, Rumof- sky, and Inokhodzof, have shown themselves ac- complished in a very respectable degree, by their memoirs in the transactions of the academy. Be- side these, Koselsky, Anit^chkof, Golovin, and Siretuschkin, have published distinct works on various branches of the Mathematics, which, be- side doing honour to their authors, have contri- buted to extend the knowledge of this science among their countrymen. For contributions to the science of Geography^ Russia is still more distinguished. The Statistical S^irvey of the Russian Empire, by Pleschtscheyef, is a very instructive and valuable work. In ad- dition to this, the various publications of Suyef, Irodionof, Kotoftzof, and Hackman, are all con- spicuous and useful. A little more than thii'ty years ago, the science of Medicine was wholly uncultivated in Russia. It is said, that scarcely three books had been pub- lished on this subject in the whole empire, antece- dently to the year 1770. Since that period, the progress of medical knowledge has been astonish- ingly great, and the number of medical publica- tions remarkably increased. To professor Ambo- dick, his countrymen are indebted for valuable publications on anatomy, physiology, materia me- dica, and obstetrics, beside translations of some important works on different branches of the heal- ing art. The medical works of Schumliansky, Tichorsky, Samoilovitch, and Terekhofsky, both original compositions and translations, are also mentioned with applause by the literary histo- rian- of that country. It is, moreover, proper to Sect. I.] Russia. ^ IG3 take notice, that several foreigners of distinction have published, on various medical subjects, in the Russian language. The names of Bacherach, Vien, Pekin, Uhden, Mohrenheim, and Ellisen, belong to this list, and are represented as holding a respectable station in the public opinion at Petersburg. In Historical composition, Russia has lately produced some specimens worthy of notice. The History of Russia, by Schtscherbatof,, is said to hold the first place in the catalogue. Beside this, the various productions of Gollikof, Tumansky, Tschulkof, Bogdanovitch, and Vagonof, are ge- nerally mentioned amojig the respectable works of this class. In Poetry, it was before observed, that Russia had given birth to works of considerable merit; and also that they were almost whqlly the productions of the eighteenth century. The services rendered to this branch of literature by Lomonozof, Sumorokof, Kherashof, and Karam- sin, were particularly mentioned in a former chapter. Beside these, Kniseshnin, Derschaven, Petrof, van AVisin, and Yelaghen, are enumerated, with great respect, among those Russian poets, who are either now living or lately deceased. Even the Fi?ie Arts have not been vrithout some zealous and able cultivators in the empire under review. In Painting, Levitsky and Koslof, beside several foreigners, are much distinguished; the former in portrait, the latter in history : in Sculp- ture, Schubin, Maschalof, Ivanof, Gardeyef, and Khailof, are mentioned as respectable artists : ^nd in Efigraimig, Skorodumof and Sclijepper, M 2 164 Nations lately becDJiie Literary. [CiL XXVL beside others, drawn from different countries, afford abundant evidence, that, even in the inhos- pitable climate of Russia, the elegant arts can live and flourish. The study of Languages has been, for a num- ber of years, more cultivated in Russia than could have been expected, considering the infant state of literature in that country. Beside all the at- tention paid to the cultivation of the vulgar tongue, ■which was before noticed, and the nu- merous instances of profound acquaintance with the best writers of Greece and Rome*, consi- derable labour has been bestowed, by a number of the literati of that empire, on the study of va- rious living languages. The astonishing monu- ment of learning and industry, in this branch of inquiry, given to the public by professor Pallas, was mentioned in a former chapter, as doing him great honour. The translator Y?erig is sup- ported by the academy, to study the Alongolian language among that people. Leontief, of the college of foreign affairs, has translated a great number of works from the Cliinese language, and may be considered among the most accomplished scholars in Chinese literature now living in Europe. And there is no want of works in Russia, * Among n>any persons who might be mentioned as having distinguished themselves by their attainments in classic litera- ture, it would be improper not to take some notice of Plato, archbishop of Moscow, and Eugenius, a naturalised foreigner, archbishop of Slavensk and Kherson. The former has the cha- racter of a profound scholar ; but the latter is perhaps still more celebrated for his translation of the iic/oj^j;« and Geor^/cs of Vir- gil into Greek hexameters, which was a few years ago splendidly ' printed in folio, at the expense of prince Poterakin. Sect. I.] Russia. IG5 for learning a large portion of the modern Euro- pean languages. Literarij Journals have never had much encou- ragement or circulation in Russia. Several at- tempts have been made to establish them, and they have obtained a slender support for a time ; but the state of literature in that country is not sufficiently popular to render works of this kind generally sought after and read. Newspapers are also few in number, and comparatively confined in their dissemination. The nature of the go- vernment conspires with various other disadvan- tageous circumstances, to impose restraints on their circulation. Petersburg possesses onXy one public library; but has several large private collections of books, and cabinets of natural history, &c. : the booksell- ing trade, however, has experienced an auspi- cious increase. The metropolis could boast in 1793 of about thirt}^ booksellers ; and towards the close of the last empress's reign, book-shops were first seen in the markets and fairs of provincial towns *. During the last four years of the century under review, literature, it is believed, has received much less encouragement from the governing powers in Russia than for a considerable period before. And indeed, after all, it must be acknowledged, that the advantages of education have by no means had that general and equal diffusion in the em- pire which is to be wished, and might have been expected ; and that a large portion of the inha- * Sec Store h's Picture of Petersburg. 166 Nations lately become Literary, [Ch. XXVI. bitants are still sunk in a degree of ignorance and barbarism, which the exertions of another cen- tury, and of another succession of enterprising sovereigns, Avill perhaps not be more thian suffi- cient to remove. SECTION II. GERMANY. It can scarcely be said, with strict propriety, that Germany has lately become literary; fof iong before the period under consideration, there was much, both of literature and of science, in that empire. Those who have any acquaintance with the great contributors to human knowledge, wiiose names adorn the history of Europe, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, need not be informed, that of this number Germany may claim a very respectable portion. But the culti- vation of the German language ; the publication of dignified and popular works in that language ; and especially the commencement of a just taste in German literature^ may all, Avith truth, be ascribed to the eighteenth century. At. the beginning of this period, all works of importance in Germany were written in the Latin tongue : and it seemed then to be a prevalent opinion among the Jiterati of that country, that the compilation of huge folios, interspersed with innumerable quotations from writers in all known languages, was the most unequivocal proof of Sect. II. ] Germany. 167 literary merit. For this reason, the greater part of German procKictions, prior to the period under review, were proverbially tedious and dull, and were seldom sought after by the learned of other nations j insomuch, that it was often and seriously questioned, whether genius could grow in a Ger- man soil. The first conspicuous writer who emplo3'ed the German language in important scientific publi- cations was Christopher Thomasius, the celebrated metaphysician and moral philosopher, who died in 1728. After him Wolf was the next wlio made use of the vulgar tongue, in treating of philoso- phical subjects. This example was soon followed by Mosheim, Schlegel, and others, of distinguished reputation in various species of composition *. But though the employment of the German language in philosophical works began thus early in the last century, yet it must be confessed, that in the former part of it this language was ex- tremely rude, harsh, and disgusting; exhibiting a motley mixture of Latin, French, and Italian words and idioms, incorporated without judge- ment or taste with the original Gothic stores f . * For a knowledge of many of the facts and names contained in the following pages, the author acknowledges himself to be indebted to the Historical Account, S^c, before quoted, and ascribed to the rev. Mr. Will, now of New York. f In the sixteenth century some specimens of German style were given to the public, much superior to any that appeared in the seventeenth. The works of Martin Luther, the great re- former, exhibit, we are told, a correctness, variety, and energy of diction, not to be met with in the works of any writer that preceded him, nor indeed of any that immediately followed him. Through the greater j/art of the seventeenth century this language 168 Nations laidi) become Literary. [Cii. XXVI, It is true, much was done al^ont this time, by several learned men, for regulating me grammar of their vernacular tongue. K. Dunkelberg, who died in I7O8, was the first conspicuous German who perceived and publicly insisted on the necessity of regularly instructing the youth of his country in their native language. After him, Schilter, Leibnitz, von Stade, Steinbach, Wachter, and Frisch, wrote largely on the German language, and contributed much to its regulation and refine- ment. Still, however, after all the labours of these philologists, persons of tolerable correctness of taste were much dissatisfied with the corrupt jargon which continued to be in vogue. About the year 1740, J. C. Gottsched became animated v/ith a laudable zeal for the improve- ment of his native language, and engaged with ardour in various undertakings for this purpose ; and though his own style was far from being a model of that purity and elegance for which he contended, yet his labours were by no means without considerable effect. He wrote several works on the subject, which were extensively useful. He engaged in controversies relating to philological questions with Bodmer, Breitinger, and others, w^hich also served to throw important light on the Gernian language. And he directed the attention of his countrymen to the English and French classic writers, whose influence in pro- iijoting the same object was very sensible. In Avas In a course of degeneracy ; and at the commencement of tbe eighteenth was found in a condition ^yhich loudly demanded (•eform. Sect. II.] Germany. 169 short, before the death of this indefatigable la- bourer, which happened in 1766, he had done much to discountenance the wretched models which were before implicitly followed, and to bring into view principles and examples more worthy of imitation. While Gottsched was engaged in these useful exertions, the great object of his pursuit was aided by the WTitings of Popowitsch and Meiners, who both published extensive and important works on the German language, and contributed to- ward its improvement in a degree much to their honour. But to no individual now living is this language more indebted than to the celebrated J. C. Adelung, who was mentioned in a former chapter. His Grammar and Dictionary of the i//<;A German lan^iiaire * are famous throu2:houL Europe, and have proba]:)ly done more to explore the etymology, to correct the orthography, and to regulate the syntax of that language, than any writer who appeared before him. To the above named eminent cultivators of the German lan- guage we might add, Voightel, Fulda, Moritz, and many more, ^vho have published works on the subject of various degrees of merit, and who are mentioned with honour among the useful phi- lologists of that country. * The language snoken in the middle and southern parts of Germany is called iheHigk German, of which that dialect which pre\ uils in Upper Saxony, especially in Leipsic, Dresden, ^t., is reckoned the most pure and elegant. In Lower Saxony and Westphalia the country people speak a language called Flat German, or Loxo Dutch, but still differing greatly from the Loxv Dutch of the United Netherlands. 170 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. But beside the numerous and valuable im- provements which the German language owes tCJ the professed writers on the subject mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, much may be ascribed to the circulation and influence of those specimens of good writing in that language, with which the eighteenth century, and especially the latter half of it, abounded. In this list, the first in chronological order which deserve to be men- tioned are the publications of Bo<:lmer, Breitin- ger, Gellert, Rabener, Cramer, and a few others, who furnished examples of regular and polished style decidedly superior to any former models. The period in which these men wrote is repre- sented as the first grand epocha in the progress of German prose. It was in this period that the French classic writers began to be better known in Germany, through the medium of translations, by means of which the German style was enriched with many new words, idioms, and graces. The second epocha in the German style is repre- sented to be that which was formed by the au- thors of the Berlinschen Litter aturhriejen, and especially by Lessing and Moses Mendelssohn. About this time the British classic writers began to be studied with much ardour in Germany; and many of them being translated, and consi- dered as models by some of the most respectable authors of that country, gave rise to new and im- portant improvements in their style. The beau- ties of Milton, Addison, Swift, and Pope, began not only to be relished, but also to be copied by the German literati ; and were soon afterwards, \\\ a considerable degree, transfused into their own Sect. 11.] Germany, 171 tongue. From this period we are told that Ger- man prose became more concise, copious, and energetic, as well as more lofty and bold in its port. The third and last epocha in the progress of German style is that formed by the writings of a number of eminent men since the improvements of Lessing and his contemporaries. Among these, Klopstock, Zimmermann, Wieland, Unzer, Herder*, Garve, Engel, Lavater, and a number of others, hold a high place. These writers en- riched the language in which they wrote with new w^ords and phrases ; taught new and improved modes of constructing periods ; introduced orna- ments of speech more simple, natural, and ele- gant, than those which had been commonly in use before ; and infused a sprightliness and vi- gour into their pages which scarcely any pre- ceding writers had attained. The German con- stitution has confined eloquence almost entirely to the pulpit. We must therefore look to the sermons of that country for some of the best spe- cimei^s of style. Mosheim was the first who in- troduced any kind of refinement and elegance of composition into the sacred desk. He was fol- lowed by Spaldingj who is said to have- been the first pulpit orator in Germany, who, in a supe- rior degree, united simplicity with elegance, ener- gy, and pathos. Zollikofer stands in the same high rank, with the addition of a philosophical cast to the elegant and popular form of his dis- * Of all the German writers it is generally supposed that Klopstock, Lessing, Wielaud, and Herder, discover the most pro- C^und and intimate acquaintance with tlieir native langviagc 1 7'2 Nations lately become Liteiriri/. [Ch. XXVL courses. Beside these, the names of Sturm, Cra- mer, Sack, Less, Seller, Reinhard, Wurz, Braun, and many others, are considerably distinguished in the annals of sacred eloquence. From all these sources, the German language, within the last fifty years, has drawn improve- ments so rich and numerous, that it is said to be one of the most copious and energetic li^ngqages in Europe. It has gained astonishingly in con- venient and sonorous compounds, in elegant idioms, and graceful inversions j insomuch, that the German writer, instead of being cramped in every step of his progress by a narrow, confused, and unsettled jargon, as was the case at the be- ginning of the eighteenth centurjs has now a language at command, rich, various, of most ac- commodating pliancy, abundantly adequate to all his wants, and capable of being modified to as great a degree of perspicuity, suavity, and har- mony, as almost any modern tongue. In consequence of these improvements in the German language, it has been adopted, within a few years past, in most of the courts of the em- pire, instead of the French, which was formerly the court language in almost every part of Ger- many. Nor is its currency confined to the Ger- man empire. It has lately become one of the fashionable languages of Europe, and the acqui- sition of it is now considered nearly as important a part of polite education, as the acquisition of the French or English. While the German language was undergoing this rerdical and important reform, other objects pf a, literary and scientific nature engaged the Sect. II, ] Germany. 173 attention of the learned men of that country, and were pursued with a degree of diligence and success which does them and the age which gave them birth the highest honour. A few facts and names only, out of the multitude which occur, can be mentioned in this place. Natural or Mechanical Philosophy was cultivated by a fevv' distinguished Germans in the seventeenth century ; but in the eighteenth the number of this class of philosophers astonishingl}^ increased in every part of the empire. The names of Leib- nitz, AVolf, Kastner, Lambert, Mayer, von Zach, Herschel, Boze, Winckler, Ludolf, Richter, Y^olt- man, von Humboldt, Schroeter, and Burckhardt, are only a small portion of those whose fame has fdled the scientific world, as the authors of im- portant discoveries and improvements in philo- sophy. In Natural History the Germans made wonder- ful progress in the course of the last age. The amount of what they accomplished in this branch of science during the seventeenth century "was comparatively small. Soon after the commence- ment of the eighteenth century better prospects opened, and since that time have been very ho- nourably realised. No naturalist needs to be reminded of the invaluable service rendered to Zoology by madam^e Merian, Rosel, Klein, Lud- wig, Frisch, Zimmermann, Blumenbach, Soem- mering, Bloch, Muller, Leske, and Forster. Ad- ditions, not less important, or less known, have been made, within the same time, to Botanical science, by Knaut, Gtcrtner, Iledwig, Schreb(^r, Jacquin, Breidel, Gmelin, Wildenovr, S])rong(?l, 174 Nations lately become Litetary. [Ch. XXVI. and many others. While Mineralogy has re- ceived immense improvements from the hands of Henke], Woltersdorf, Vogel, Cartheuser, Voigt, Gellert, Raspe, Pott, Margraaff, and Werner. At the commencement of the period under con- sideration atill less had been done in Chemistry^ by the German philosophers, than in either of the preceding departments of science. How great an amount of discovery and of useful experiment they have presented to the public since that time, it is unnecessary to state. The labours of Stahl, Juncker, Pott, Margraaf, Neumann, Klaproth, Crell, Meyer, Ingenhousz, Jacquin, and von Hum- boldt, are kno^vn and esteemed wherever chemi- cal science is studied. Of distinguished writers on Medicine^ Germany has been, though not equally, 3'et very honourably prolific during the period under review. The claims of Stahl, Hoff- mann, van Swieten, Hcister, Storck, Vogel, and }^furray, to high honours, are generally acknow- ledged. And beside these, de Haen, Meckel, Weitbrccht, Sagar, Ilufeland, Reil, Roschlaub, Reich, and many others, have contributed to raise the medical character of their country. But it is chiefly with respect to progress in literature^ strictly so called, that the eighteenth century gave rise to such remarkable improve- ments in Germany. In the Belles Lettres, and in works of taste generally, that extensive empire furnished nothing worthy of notice anterior to the age under consideration. But within this period no other part of the literary world has been, on the whole, so abund*ntly productive of works of this nature. Sect. II.] Germany. 175 It was observed in a former chapter, that no Historical work, deserving of commendation for its taste or elegance, had appeared in Germanr prior to the period under review. Within the latter half of this period, the works of Haber- lin, Gebauer, Schmidt, Muller, Heinrich, Beck, Meusel, Gatterer, Galletti, Ebeling, and Schiller, afford very honourable monuments of German talents. Of these the manner of Schiller appears to be considered as the most easy, spirited^ and elegant- But though the historians of that country have made great progress, within a iev> years past, in cultivating this species of compo- sition, it is conceived that none of them have yet reached the high rank of historical excellence for which Robertson, Hume, and Gibbon, are so generally celebrated. The Germans exceed all the rest of the v»orld in the number and excellence of their Statistical histories. The first work published under this denomination, and in a scientific form, was about the middle of the century, by professor Achen- wall, of Gottingen, who is considered as the father of Statistics. Since that time many others have published works of a similar nature, but of superior excellence. Among these Walch, Reinhard, Bauman, Toze, Remer, Meusel, and Sprengel, are entitled to particular notice- But there is no species of composition v/ith re- spect to which a greater improvement has been made in Germany, during the last age, than in that of Fictitious History. The only Romances or Novels which had appeared in that country, at the beginning of the century, were wretched 176 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch, XXVI. imitations, which attract attention at present only as monuments of bad taste. About the year 1746, Gellert made the first attempt to introduce a different and more correct model of fictitious history. The appearance of his Scliwedische Grd" Jin, publislicd in that J^ear, forms a new era in this department of German literature. The novels published in German}', from 1746 to 17'54, were, for the most part, translations from the English and French languages. In 1754 Gesner's pastoral romance, entitled Daphnis, appeared ; excited much attention, and formed a second epocha in the progress of this kind of composition. A few years afterward the Teutschen Grandison of Mu- Stisus, and the Agatlion of Wieland, gave another and a still more correct turn to the German taste in novel writing. Beside these, the various works of Goethe, Schiller, Nicholai, Klinger, Herder, Richter, and many others, deserve to be enume- rated among the most celebrated fiction? of that country*. In no part of Europe, it may be safely affirmed, are so many novels continually produced as in Germany. Several hundreds annually issue from the press, and are circulated with growing zeal in every part of tlic empire. It must be granted, however, that some of the most popular German novels are highly mischievous in their moral tendency; and that no small number of their mercenary writers are constantl}^ engaged in diffusing, through the medium of fictitious his- * The author is too liltle acquainted with the works of these and other German novelists, to say any tiling about their com- parative moral tendency. He only nioans to speak of them as celebrated in a literary view. Sect. II.] Germany. 177 toiy, the most corrupt and poisonous principles, both in religion and morals. No less remarkable has been the progress of the German literati in Poetry, within the last fifty years. The history of literature in that country presents us with no specimens of poetry to which any high degree of excellence can be ascribed, before those of Hagedorn and Haller, who were both born in 1708, and who are justly considered as the founders of the modern poetical school in Germany. Between 1740 and 17-50, an associa- tion was formed by a set of young poets, pos- sessed of eminent talents ; many of whose com- positions were published in the Belustigungen des Verstandes und Witzes, and in the Neuen Beytrd^ gen zum Vergniigen des Verslandes und Witzes. The most eminent members of this society were Cramer, Gellert, Gleim, Klopstock and Kabner. Among these, the works of Gellert and Klop- stock had the most extensive and the most happy influence on the poetic taste of their countrymen. The Messiah of the latter * introduced a great and very useful reform both in the diction and versification of German poetry. So that the period of their association may be considered as forming a grand epocha in the history of this de- partment of German literature. Beside the poets already mentioned, a number of others have been long celebrated throughout Europe. Among these are Gesner and Wieland, distinguished in epic poetry j Kastner, Uz, and * Klopstock published the first Canto of his Messiah m 1748 ; but it was not completed till the year 1773. Vol. Ill, N 178 Nations lately become Literary. [C[L XXVI., Diisch, ill didactic poetiy ; Kleist, \"oss, and Goethe, m descriptive ^oeiiy :, Schlegel, Herder, Weisse, and Raniler, in lyric ; and Canitz and Stolbers,'-, in satirical poetry : Gesner and Voss^ in pastoral ; and Lichtwehr, Lessing, and others, in fable. Nor have the dramatic poets of Ger- many, in the last age,, been inferior in genius and taste to those of any other country, Cruger, Schrarder, Iffland, Grossman, Lessing, Engel, Goethe, and Kotzebue, in comedy ; and Weisse, Lessing, Leisewitz, Klopstock, Schiller, Goethe, Babo, and others, in tragedy, are well known to have raised the German drama to a very high degree of reputation, if not for moral purity, at least for spirit, force, and natural delineation of characters. Germany has also abounded within the last twenty years, beyond any country on earth, in miscellaneous publications on philology, criti- cism, education, and every branch of polite lite- rature. It ought further to be mentioned, to the honour of Germany, that although classic litera- ture lias much declined in that country, especially since the practice of delivering lectures in Latin,, and speaking that language, in many of her se- minaries of learning, has been discontinued ; yet this kind of knowledge has declined probably less in Germany than in any other part of the literary world ; and the literati of that empire may be considered as, on the whole, the best classic scholars that now adorn the republic of h'ttcrs. The names of Kuster, Reiske, Ernesti, lleyne, Kuhnken, Matthasi, Schneider, Voss, lleeren, F. A. Wolf, Bottis^er, and Heusingcr,. Sfxt. II.] Germany. 179 with a much greater number of nearly equal emi- nence, would do the highest honour to any coun- try, or any age. Oriental literature eminently flourished in Ger- many during the eighteenth century. It may be questioned whether the oriental learning and critical skill of the Michaelises, Eichhorn, and Reiske, were ever before equalled. To which il- lustrious names it would be improper not to add those of Reineccius, Ludolf, Hezel, Schroeder, Wahl, Hirt, Tychsen, Paulus, and Hasse, who have rendered important services to the cause of eastern learning, and biblical criticism. No country has ever produced so great a num- ber of authors, within a similar period, as Ger- many, in the eighteenth century ; and there is no country where a taste for reading more generally prevails, especially in the protestant provinces. Printing is carried to an excess truly wonderful. Almost every man of letters is an author. Books are multiplied to an incredible extent. Between six and seven thousand new works are annually published, beside smaller controversial pieces ; for no one can become a graduate in their uni- versities unless he has published at least one con- troversial treatise. In Germany the authors by profession amount to about fifteen thousand? It is true, the greater part of these are chiefly occupied in translating from other languages, especially the French and English. But their translations are generally ac- companied with large bodies of learned notes, which, if well executed, require all the judgement and labour of original composition. It is further N 2 180 Nations lately become Liter m^y. [Cll. XXVI. to be observed, that, of their prodigious number of books. Novels make a considerable part. But they also make a large annual emission of im- portant works on the most interesting subjects in literature and science. The book-trade of England and France is al- most entirely confnied to their capitals, while the other great towns have few booksellers ; and even the greater part of these only act as factors or agents to those who reside in the grand centre of business. But the German empire has no capital city, which, like London or Paris, forms a kind of literary vortex, that absorbs the whole produce of the country, and out of which few books are to be found. For this reason literature is more ge- nerally diffused in Germany. The residence of many a petty prince is more fertile in literary productions, than some large cities in England or France. Hence the book-trade is more equally distributed through the country ; and small towns, otherwise of little importance, are fur- nished with respectable and independent book- sellers, each of whom, perhaps, will carry to the Leipsic and Frankfort fairs a dozen new works published by him, to be distributed not only in his own immediate neighbourhood, but also in, every province of the empire. The mode of disposing of books by resorting to Fairs for the purpose is peculiar to Germany, and has been established in that country for many years. To these great literary marts the book- sellers flock in crowds from every part of the country, with bales of books, and with complete catalogues of the works which. they have to sell. Sect. II.] Germany. 181 Here an amount of sales, and especially of barter, is effected, which has no parallel in the world. This plan is attended with many advantages. Booksellers, by having so extensive and ready a sale, are enabled to strike off much larger im- pressions of good works, and to afford them at a lower price. He who wishes to procure a book in that country, instead of being con- demned to a long and tedious search for v* hat is only sold by one bookseller, has every publica- tion of value brought to his door with the great- est certainty and expedition. And the frequent return of these extensive scenes of sale and ex- change, has a tendency to keep up the public at- tention to literary objects, and to give a degree of life and interest to the commerce in books, which we look for in vain in other countries. The zeal and enterprise of German booksel- lers are incredible. They frequently have agents and correspondents in every literary p&.rt of Eu- rope, who send them, with the utmost speed, all useful intelligence, and procure for them the proof-sheets of new and important works as they are printing : whence it often happens, that the originals and the German translations are offered for sale at the same time. To this it may be added, that the ready and extensive sales of books which the fairs enable them to effect, give such manifest advantages, that they can more easily afford, and are more cheerfully disposed to pa}^ a liberal price for literary services, than the same class of men in most other countries. It is said that between three and four hundred booksellers 182 Nations latelx) become Literary. [CilXXVI. regularly attend the literary fairs, and that their number is rapidly increasing. In Great Britain and Ireland there are seven universities. In Germany there are thirty-nine* ; each of which maybe considered as a grand focus from which the rays of light are thrown over the Avhole adjacent country, thus illuminating the empire, and bringing the means of knowledge to almost every door. Within a few years a taste for the acquisi- tion of living languages has remarkably prevailed in Germ.any. Perhaps the inhabitants of no country are so much disposed as those of the Ger- man empire to learn the languages of other na- tions. Beside the English and French, which have a very general currency (being read and spoken by a very large portion of their literary men), the Italian, Spanish, and Swedish are taught in many of their seminaries of learning. The great increase of this taste is one of the circum- stances which preeminently distinguish German literature in the eighteenth century. The interests of letters and science have seldom received very extensive or permanent aid from government in Germany. The constitution of the empire prevents any material aid of this kind from being rendered, especially on a large scale, A few of the subordinate princes have distinguished themselves by their efforts for the advancement * Six of these universities were founded during the eighteenth century ; viz. those of Gdtnngen, Erlahgen, Fulda, Bom> Butzow, and Stutgard. SfXT. IL] Germany. 183 of knowledge; and though Frederic II of Prussia was no friend to the German language *, yet his accession to the throne may be considered as a favourable era to German literature; because, by collecting so many foreigners, and especially Frenchmen, at his court, he excited a spirit of emulation among his native subjects; introduced much of the literature and science of other coun- tries into his dominions ; and thus indirectly pro- moted the general interests of knowledge in Ger- many. Public Libraries were greatly enlarged and multiplied in Germany in the course of the eighteenth century. To this circumstance, and also to the great multiplication of literary and scientific Societies, may be ascribed no small share of that astonishing progress in literature and science by which every part of the country, and especially the northern provinces, have for some time been and are every day becoming more distinguished. In short, during the eighteenth century Ger- many has risen from pedantry and dulness to a high character for genius and refined accomplish- ments in the literary world. Instead of present- ing few and cornparativcly uninteresting publica- tions, as was the case a hundred years ago, she has become by far the most prolific nation on * Frederic II, among his numerous freaks and errours, was a great enemy to the German language. He ordered the Trans- actions of the Royal Society of Berlin to be published in French ; by whicli, as many supposedj he meant to cast undeserved re- proach ©n his native tongue, and to discourage the study an4 cultivation of it, tljough it had then become so fashionable. 184 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. earth in every species of literary production. She gives birth annually to double the number of pub- , lications that appear in France, and to nearly treble the number that are issued in Great Britain and Ireland *. Instead of being despised as she was at the beginning of the century for furnish- ing scarcely any other than hewers of ivood and draivers of water to the republic of letters, she has produced, within the last fifty years, histo- rians, poets, and dramatists, whose writings evince, that judgement, acuteness, imagination, elegant taste^ and every qualification for fine writing, abound among her people. In fact, she has in several respects pushed her literary progress to a degree hitherto attained by no other nation, and affords a striking example of the influence of literature on national character. But, while the progress of Germany in liberal knowledge, the industry of her authors, the en- terprise of her booksellers, and the growth of taste * The whole population of Germany is not supposed to exceed ihirt}) millions. In the Austrian dominions the class of peasants are mostly serfs, or predial slaves, of which it is probable few are able to read. In the other provinces, especially Suabia, West- phalia, and the Upper Rhine, the number must be very great of those who, if they have been taught to read at all, never devote any part of their attention to books. Not more than ten millions of the thirty are of the reading age ; and it is a very liberal cal- culation to suppose, that, of these ^.en millions, not more than one tenth are in the habit of purchasing and perusing books. Hence, allowing the number of authors by profession to be fifteen thoii' sand, which is said by some to be much below the real num- ber, it appears, that, for every sixty-six readers, there is one who lives by the trade of authorship. — See New York Month. Mag. vol. ii, p. 9. Sect. II.] Germany, 185 among her literati, deserve much praise, it may be questioned whether the friend of sound and useful learning can contemplate her literary aspect with unmingled pleasure. Is it not to be feared that the business of book-making is carried in that country to excess ? Is it useful to fill a country with a countless number of hastily composcjd, and of course superficial books, on the most com- mon subjects; thus perplexing and overwhelm- ing the student, and imposing an unnecessary tax on the friends of literature ? Above all, are not the moral and theological principles contained in too many of these works, and the practical ten- dency of a still larger number, such as must fill the virtuous mind with apprehension } There is such a thing as an injurious multiplication of books, even when they are all, individually harm- less; but where a considerable portion of them, bear a corrupt character, every increase of their number will give the friend of human happiness a mixture of pain. There is no country now on earth (unless, perliaps, we must except France) in which literary enterprise is made the medium for conveying so much moral and theological poison as in Germany *. * See Additional NoUs (L), 186 Xations latelij become Liter ary. [Cil. XXVI. SECTION III. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The annals of American literature are short and simple. The history of poverty is usually neither very various, nor very interesting. Those who are accustomed to contemplate only the ancient and extensive literary establishments of Europe, and who measure every object by Eu- ropean standards, must look upon all that the Western hemisphere has hitherto presented, espe- cially until within a ^ew years past, as trivial and unworthy of regard. But those who recollect the origin and progress of the settlements which now form the United States, and who make an im- partial estimate of what may be justly expected from a people situate as their inhabitants have been and are, will entertain a more respectful opinion of the small portion of literature which the country contains *. * The author regrets that his account of the rise and progress of Y^merican literature is so much less full and satisfactory than he once hoped to make it. With all his partiality for his native country, he is convinced that its literary history, even if com- pletely drawn out, Avould not make a very honourable figure. But of the few learned men and literary events of which we have to boast, it is mortifying that we know so little. The very names of some who, a century ago, were the most conspicuous bene- factors to the interests of liberal knowledge in our country, are now almost forgotten; and with respect to the details of their acquirements and services, nothing can be learned. An attempt Sect. III.] United States of America. 187 ■ The original settlers of the American States may be divided into three classes, viz. 1. Emi- grants from England, who fled from persecution, and came to enjoy liberty of conscience : of this class were the fn-st settlers in New England. 2. Emigrants from the same country, who were prompted chiefly by the hope of temporal emo- lument: of this description were the first settlers in Virginia and tlie Carolinas. 3. Emigrants from Sweden and Holland, who planted them- selves in New York, and certain parts of New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The English colony established some years afterward in Pennsylva- nia by the illustrious William Penn, as well as that in Maryland by lord Baltimore, may be consi- dered as bearing the mixed character of settle- ments prompted both by religious and worldly motives. It-inight have been expected that the colonists of New England woidd be most early and zealous in their attention to literature. Their character, both for learning and piety, and the circum- stances attending their establishment, were suffi- cient pledges of their disposition to promote the interests of knowledge, which they well knew to be one of the most important pillars of the church as well as of the state. Accordingly, dur- ing the greater part of the seventeenth century, is made in the following pages, to collect a few of the names and fuels which appeared worthy of notice. There is no doubt that many more will occur to different readers equally worthy of being mentioned. The author can only say, that he has endea- voured, as impartially as he was able, to exhibit the small portion of information which came within his reach. 188 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. the literature of the American colonies was in a great measure confined to New England. There the first college in America was instituted*; there the first printing press was established f ; and liiose who are acquainted with the characters of Hooker, Davenport, Stone, WarhamJ, Cotton, Dunsler, Chauncey, Eliot, the Mathers, and other distinguished clergymen; and ofWinthrop, Hayner, Eaton, Hopkins, Wyllys, and Wolcoi, eminent civilians of Massachusetts and Connec- ticut, need not be informed that the number of learned men at that period in New England was by no means small. The kind of learning most in vogue among such of the clergy and laity of that country as de- voted themselves to study, during the seventeenth century, v>as precisely that kind which was most * Harvard college was Instituted in 163S, a few years after the first settlement of the colony. In the Additional Notes to this volume, the reader will find as particular an account of all the colleges in the United States, as the author could collect. He therefore forbears to enter into further details in this place. f The first printing press established in North America was by Mr. Samuel Green, at Cambridge, in Massachusetts, in the year 1638. The first work printed was the Freentan's Oath; the next an Almanac, made for New England, by Mr. Pierce, a mariner ; and then the Psalms of David, newly turned into metre, 8fc. There was printing work done in South America earlier than this. Professor Barton, of Philadelphia, whose zeal and talents in ex- ploring American antiquities do him the highest honour, lately showed the author a vocabulary of one of the principal Indian, languages of South America, printed in Mexico, not long after the middle of the sixteenth century. 1 The rev. John Warham, who died at Windsor, in Connec- ticut, in 1670, is said to have been the first minister in New En- gland who used nates in preaching. Sect. III.] United States of America. 18<) fashionable in their native country when they left it*. Accordingly they were generally well, and some of tliem profoundly, read in the Latin, Greek, and Hebrew languages ; in theology, an- cient history, metaphysics, and some parts of ma- thematical and astronomical science. There is good reason to believe that the clergy and other scholars of New England, for near a hundred years after their first settlement, that is, till after the commencement of the eighteenth century, were more eminent for classical and theological erudition than men of the same profession at this dayf. They were, in particular, much better acquainted with the Latin and Greek writers than their descendants can now boast of being; TiwA many of them were masters of the Hebrew lan- guage, which at present is almost entirely neg- lected J. * The university of Cambridge, in Massachusetts, was formed, as far as circumstances would admit, on the same plan Avith the . universities in England; and the same course of learning was, in. substance, pursued. The study of biblical literature and theological science was encouraged by the peculiar spirit of the times, and of the emigrants. And the direction once given was continued by the force of example and habit long afterwards. f This appears not only from the MagnaUa Americana of the celebrated Cotton Mather, but also from the few publications made by the clergy and others of that day ; from an inspection of the books found in their libraries, and from the quality of early donations in books made to Harvard and Yale colleges. X Marty of the distinguished divines of Massachusetts and, Connecticut, in the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth centuries, were celebrated for their knowledge of the Hebrew language. It is said that the rev. John Davenport, the second clergyman of that name, and who died minister of the church at 190 Xafmis lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI, Beside the establishment of a college in Mas- sachusetts, the inhabitants of that colony directed early and particular attention to the erection of subordinate schools in every part of the country. In 1641 the following law was enacted: " If any do not teach their children and apprentices so much learning as may enable them to read per- fectly the English language, to forfeit twenty shillings ; and the selectmen of every town are required to know the state of the families, &c." Not long aftCTward a law was made, that when any town increased tj» the number of one hundred families, they should set up a grammar school, the master thereof being able to instruct youth so far as that they may be fitted for the university, under certain penalties. To these schools, after a few years, academies were added ; thus forming a system of general education, which has been from time to time improved, and which in the eighteenth century became one of ihe distin- guished honours of New England. It was not till towards the close of the seven- teenth century that a seminary of respectable character, for general instruction in literature and science, was established in Virginia. The origi- nal settlers in that colony were, in several re- spects, of a very different description from their countrvmen who settled in New Eno^land. But a small portion of them could boast of any consi- derable acquirements or taste in literature. Ac- tuated chiefly by the love of gain in coming to a Stamford, in Connecticut, about the year 1731, carried into his pulpit a Hebrew Bible only, and made use of no other. Sfxt. III.] United States of Amej^ca. 191 rude £tnd uncultivated country, they directed their principal attention to this object, and neglected most other concerns. Besides, not being so much- under the iniluence of religious principles as their eastern brethren*, nor feeling in so high a degree the necessity of literary institutions for the pro- motion of ecclesiastical as well as civil prosperity, they might naturally have been expected to be more indifferent about their establishment. And- to crown all, being formed of members who, though chiefly from one country, were less equal in station, less homogeneous in character, and less united by common sufferings, it was not to be supposed that they would act with the same har- mony and zeal, in any pursuit which had public good for its object. Hence, during a great part of the seventeentli century, the southern colonists paid but little at- tention to literary institutions. Such as wished to give their sons a liberal education, and could afford the expense, sent them to Europe for this purpose, and generally to some of the universities of Great Britain. This practice, indeed, was con- tinued by many for a long time afterward ; and accordingly it happened, that, until near the mid- dle of the eighteenth century, by far the greater proportion of the young men of the Southern States who were liberally educated, had received * The author does not mean to intimate that the fust settlers in Virginia were destitute of religion ; but merely (what he takes for granted every one will readily admit), that religion seems to have been a less prominent object, and to have entered less into their motives and plans iu forming the settlement, than in New England. 1 92 Nations lately become 'Literary. [Ch. XXVI. their education at European seminaries. Those who could not afford to adopt this plan wer6 obliged to content themselves either with such private tuition as they could command, or with the miserable system of instruction pursued in the few small and ill conducted schools which had been formed. Such was the low state of literature in Virginia when the rev. James Blair, who went to that co- lony as a missionary about the year 1685, ob- serving the great want of seminaries for the reli- gious and moral, as well as literary instruction of youth j and perceiving among other evils the obstacles which this presented to the success of his missionary labours, formed the design of erect- ing and endowing a college at Williamsburgh. For this purpose he not only solicited benefactions from the colonists, but also made a voyage to England in 1693, to obtain the patronage of the government, and a charter for the proposed insti- tution *. King William and queen Mary being then on the throne, the application of Mr. Blair was favourabl}'^ received; a patent was imme- diately made out for erecting and endowing a se- minary, under the name of " William and Mary college," agreeably to his request-}-, and the plan * The laudable exertions of Mr. Blair are mentioned with great respect by bishop Buniet, in hlsHisioiy of his Oivn Times. See vol. iv, p. 174. t The object declared in the charter was, " to found and esta- blish a certain place of universal study^ or perpetual college, for divinity, philosophy, languages, and other good arts and sciences." But neitJier theology nor the Hebrew language ap- pear to have been so much studiod here as at Cambridge in Mas* sachusetts, Sect. III.] United Stales of America. 193 was «oon carried into execution. He was named in the charter as the first president, and acted in that capacity till the year 174.2*. This college, though liberally endowed, has not flourished so much as its friends could wish. For more than seventy years after its establishment, it had rarely more than twenty students at any one time. The habit of sending young men to Eu- rope for their education had continued so long, that many of the more wealthy persisted in it after they had a college erected among themselves. Within a few years past the number of students has considerably increased, and the prospects of the institution are becoming much more favour- able. * The rer. James Blair was born and educated in Scotland, whwe he obtained a benelite in the episcopal church. On ac- count of the unsettled state of religion which then existed in that kingdom, he quitted his preferments, and went into England, near the end of the reign of Charles II. The bishop of London, considering him as well qualified for the office, both as to talents and piety, prevailed on him to go to Virginia as a mi;ssionary, where he was highly popular and eminently useful ; and in 1689 obtained the appointment of ecclesiastical commissary for the province. Though the charter wds given for " William and Mary college," about the year 1693, and though he was named therein as the first president, yet he does not appear to have en- tered on the duties of this office till the year 1729, from which period, until 1742, he discharged them with faithfulness. Mr. Blair was a learned and exemplary man, respected and useful in his various stations, and died at a good old asre in 174-3. lie published four octavo volumes of discourse-;, under the following title : Our Saviour's Divine Sermon on the Mount explained ; and recommended in divers Sermons and Discourses. London, 1742. This work is spoken of with high approbation by Dr. Doddrid"e, in his Fmmilj p.xpositor. Vol. III. O 194 Nations latelij become Literary. [Cil. XXVI. Neither in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylva- nia, Delaware, nor Maryland, had any thing taken place, in favour of literature, worthy of notice, prior to the eighteenth ceiitury. The in- habitants of these colonies, struggling with the difficulties of new settlements, not always in a state of perfect harmony among themselves, and of course too frequently encumbered with other engagements, did little to advance the interests of knowledge. A ^ew schools were established, but they were on a small scale, were but indifferently conducted, and attracted but iew pupils. The more wealthy class in these middle colonies, like their southern brethren, were at this time in the habit of sending their sons to Europe for their education; a practice which, though it caused a small portion of the youth in the middle and southern states to be more thoroughly educated than was common in New England, yet rendered education a much more rare attainment among the former than the latter, and, on the whole, ex- ceedingly checked the progress of literature in the colonies. It is to be observed, also, that the advancement of literature in the American colonies, during the seventeenth century, was not only retarded by the general poverty of the colonists, and by the numerous difficulties with which they had to struggle while surrounded by tribes of savages, and an uncultivated desert ; but also by the erro- neous opinions at that time prevailing concerning the liberty of the press. The business of printing was laid under very inconvenient and discouraging Sect. III.] United States of America. 19J restrictions, during a part of this period, in Mas- sachusetts*. In the province of New York, for a considerable time, the introduction of a press was entirely prohibited. And it is believed similar restraints took place in some of the other colonies. The influence of such restrictions on the general progress of liberal information could not be otherwise than highly unfavourable. At the commencement of the eighteenth cen- tury, an important seminary of learning rose in Connecticut. A number of the clergy, anxious more particularly that means might be adopted for supplying the churches with a succession of learned and able ministers, conceived the design of erecting a college. This was accordingly soon attempted, and Avith the most happy success. An act of incorporation was obtained from the gene- ral assembly in the year 1701, and the first com- mencement took place in Saybrook in lyoSf. * In 1662, twenty- four years after a printing press had been established at Cambridge, the general court of Massachusetts ap- pointed two persons as supervisors of the press, and prohibited the publishing any books or papers until after they had been examined and approved by them. In 1668 the supervisors hav- ing allowed the celebratetl work of Thomas a Kempis, De Imita- tione Christi, to be printed, the court interposed, alleging that it "had been written by a popish minister, and contained some things less safe to be diffused among the people." t Most of those who graduated on this occasion in Yale col- lege had previously taken their master's degree at Cambridge, in IVIassachusetts. This accounts for a commencement taking place so soon after the erection of the college, and before stu- dents could have been carried regularl}'^ througli an academic coyrse. It must bd acknowledged, however, that the American colleges early began to discover that fondness for dealing out 0 2 1 96 Nations lately brcorne Literary. [ClI. XXVI The course oi* instruction adopted in this college was, in general, directed tov/ards those objects Miiich were before mentioned as being most in vogue in New England. Its establishment is an important era in the literary history of Connec- ticut. From this institution, as well as from the sister college in Cambridge, many sons have been sent, who have done honour to their alma mafer^ and proved benefactors to the cause of liberal knowledge. In 1714, the foundation of a library was laid in this college. Jeremiah Dummer, esq., of Bos- ton, then an agent in London, presented to it more than eight hundred volumes of very valuable books, part of which were purchased by himself, and the rest obtained from his friends in, London. Among the donors, on this occasion, appear the names of some of the most conspicuous literary and philosophical characters then living in Great Britain *. These books, together with large ad- ditions soon afterward made by governor Yalef thrir honours with a liberal hand, which has since so much in- rreased, not only in the United States, but also throughout the literary Avorld. * In the number of the contributors to this collection of books for Yale college, we find sir Isaac Newton, sir Richard Blackmore, sir Richard Steele, Dr. Burnet, Dr. Woodward^ Dr. Halley, I>-. Bentley. Dr. Ken net. Dr. Calamy, Dr. Ed- wards, the rev. Mr. Henry, and Mr. Whiston, who severally presented copies of their own works. See the Account of Yale College ill the Appendix to the rev. Mr. Holme's Life of President Siilcs. + Thomas Yale, esq., who had been governor of Fort St. George, in India: for his repeated acts of genercsity to the college the. tiusttcs cave it his name. ■Sect. III.] United States of America. 197 and otiicrs, produced immediate and visible ef- fects on the state of learning in the colony. Be- fore their arrival there Avere scarcely any books in use, but such as had been imported with the first settlers; and of course little was known con- cerning the most important publications, disco- veries, and improvements, which had been laid before the public in the course of the preceding century. From these books, the instructors and students of Yale college first learned the phi- losophy of Locke and of Newton, as well as the important improvements which had recent- ly taken place in various departments of litera- ture. It was some years after the establishment of Yale college before the interests of literature be- gan to. assume a promising aspect in Pennsjd- vania. William Penn, being himself a learned man, was a friend to the progress of knowledge. We therefore find, that, under his auspices, there was established, as early as 1689, a respectable seminary for the instruction of j^outh, not only in reading and writing, but also in the learned lan- guages, and in the sciences. This seminary was more particularly in the hands of the Friends, and was no doubt useful in formins; many crood scholars, and in producing a considerable degree of taste for the acquisition of knowledge. The celebrated George Keith* was. the first teacher 'O' * George Keith was a native of Aberdeen, in Scotland. In early life he belonged to the episcopal church ; but afterward left that communion, and became a celebrated preacher amouij the friends. In lt)92, having manifested a troublesome and disorderly disposition, he was disowned by tliem, and in a short 19S Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. in this academy. lie continued in the office, however, but one year ; and was succeeded by Thomas Makin, who has been followed by a number of good instructors to the present time. But the circumstance of this institution being in a great measure confined to one denomination of Christians, rendered it less viseful than it might have been on a more extensive and liberal foun- dation. Among those who were most active in promoting the interests of literature from 1689, until a iew years after the commencement of the eighteenth century, Vv^e find the names of Edward Shippcn *, Anthony Morris, Jonathan Dickinson, Isaac Norris, Nicholas Wain, and James Loganf. time returned to the episcopal church. He was a man of learn- ing and talents ; but arrogant, vain, and given to litigation. * Edward Shippcn was early and much distinguished in Penn- sylvania. He came from England to Massachusetts to avoid persecution ; but belonging to the society of friends, he met with no better ti-eatment in New England than in his own coun- try. He therefore removed to Pennsylvania soon after Mr. Penn's arrival, and became conspicuous and useful in the new colony. He was successively speaker of the house of assembly, member of the governor's council, and the first mayor of the city of Phila- delphia. His descendants have continued to be persons of dis- tinction to the present day. f James Logan, meotioued in a former chapter as a distin- guished botanist, was born at Lurgan, in Ireland, in the year 1674. In 1699 he came to Pennsylvania, in company with William Penn, under whose patronage he was much employed in public affairs. He held, in succession, the several olfices of provincial scrretary, commissioner of property, chief justice, and ibr near two years discharged the duties of governor, as presi- dent of the council. He died in 1751, at Stenton, his country seat, near Germantown, where he had long enjoyed a dignified retirement, devoted to study, and much employed in correspond- ing with learned men in the different parts of Europe. He was Sect. III.] United States of America. 199 The greater part of these gentlemen were among tlie founders of the academy above mentioned, and all of them were, for a number of years after- ward, its zealous and diligent supporters. About the year 1730 a spring was given to tho progress of literature in Pennsylvania, and tlie adjacent colonies, by the exertions of some pres- byterian clergymen and others, most of whom had a short time before arrived from Europe, and who embarked with a laudable zeal in the pro- motion of knowledge. The first of these was the rev. William Tennant, an emigrant from Ireland, who, about the year last mentioned, established at Neshaminy, in the neighbourhood of Phila- delphia, an academy, which was more particu- well versed in both ancient and modern learning; had made con- siderable proficiency in oriental literature; was a master of the Greek, Latin, French, and German languages ; and had a very- respectable degree of skill in mathematics, natural and moral philosophy* and natural history. His principal works are the following: 1. Experimenta et Mektcmata de Flantaruni Geneia- t-one, ^'c, printed at Leyden in 1739, and afterwards in London, by Dr. Fothergill, in 1747. 2. Canonum pro inveniendis Refruc- tionum, turn siinplicium, turn in lentibus dupliciionfocis, Detnonstra^ tiones Gcotnetricw, ^f., also printed at Leyden in 17 39; and, 3. in his old age he translated Cicero's treatise De Stnectute, with explanatory notes, which was published with a recommenda- tory preface by Dr. Franklin in 1744-. Mr. Logan had, with great care and pains, collected a. librarj/ of more than three thousand volumes, which, at that time, was by far the largest in Pennsyl- vania, and particularly rich in works in the Latin and Greek languages, and in the most curious, excellent, and rare scientific publications. This valuable collection of books, usually called the Loi^anian lil)rary, was bequeathed by its possessor to the ci- tizens of Philadelphia, and has been since deposited in one of the apartments belonging to the library company of that city. — Proud's Ilistorj/ of Pavisi/hauia, vol. i/p. 478, ^-c. ^00 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. kirly intended for the education of ministers for the preshyterian church *, This institution con^ tinued to flourish for some time, and was the means of forming a number of good scholars, and distinguished professional characters. "When it began to decline, the rev. Mr. Roan, a learned and able divine, also of the preshyterian church, erected another academy at Neshaminy, in the vicinity of the former. Mr. Roan, as well as his predecessor, is entitled to grateful remembrance for his zeal and success in promoting useful knowledge. About this time also Mr. Theophilus Grew f from England, Mr. Annan from Scotland, and Mr. Stevenson from Ireland, set up grammar schools in Philadelphia, in which the dead lan- guages were taught with great skill and assiduity. Mr. Grevv :ivas the first person in Pennsylvania * Mr. William Tennant had been a clergyirian in the esta- blished church of Ireland before he came to America. Soon after his arrival he renounced his connexion vith the episco- pal church, and joined the presbytery of Philadelphia. He was much celebrated for his accurate and profound acquaintance with -the Latin and Greek classics, and taught them with great success in his academy on the Neshaminy, which v.as called at that time his hog college, from the edifice in which his instruction was carried on being built of logs. IMr. Tennant had four sons, Gil- bert, William, John, and Charles, who were all distinguished and useful clergymen, and whose praise has long been in the churches. f Theophilus Grew was probably a son or grandson of the celebrated botanist bearing the same name, who, in 1676, first suggested the sexual doctrine of vegetables to the Royal Society of London. The former was much distinguished as a mathema- tician, and was afterward professor of mathematics in the colleg<5 of Philadelphia. - " Sect. III.] United States of America. 2 0l who undertook to teach the English language grammatically. By the aid of these teachers some of the oldest and most respectable inhabi- tants of Pennsylvania, now living, were initiated into the elements of English and classical know- ledge. About the year 1 740 the rev. Dr. Francis Al- lison opened an academy for teaching the Latin and Greek classics and the sciences at New Lon- don, in Chester county, Pennsylvania *. Here he began that course of public instruction, and that zeal for the diffusion of general knowledge, which •ended only with his life, and to which Pennsyl- vania owes much of that taste for solid learning, and particularly for classic literature, for which many of her eminent characters have been so laudably distinguished. Not long afterward the rev. Samuel Blair opened an academy at Fog's Alanor, also in Chester county, on nearly the same plan of education. with that which was adopted in Dr. Allison's seminary, but with more particu- lar attention to the study of theology as a science. Mr. Blair was a man of respectable talents as * The rev. Francis Allison, D. D., was born iu Ireland, in the year 1705. He received an excellent classical education at an acadeniy in the north of that kingdom, under the particular in- spection of the bishop of Raphoe, and afterward completed his studies at the university of Glasgow. He came to America in 1735, and was the pastor of a presbyterian church in Chester county, Pennsylvania, until about the year 1753, when he was chosen rector of the academy in Philadelphia. Beside an un- usually accurate and profound acquaintance with the Latin and Greek classics, he was well informed in moral philosophy, his- tory, and general literature. He died in 1779, in the seventy- /burth year of his age. »$02 Nations lately become Literari/. [Cn. XXVI. well as learning *, and was eminently serviceal>lc to that part of the country as a teacher of human knowledge, as well as a minister of the Gospel. From this " school of the prophets," as it was fre- quently called, there issued forth many excellent pupils, who did honour to their instructor both as scholars and Christian ministers f . The next in- stitution of this kind was the academy opened a k\M 3^ears after Mr. Blair's, by the rev. Dr. Samuel Finley J, at AV^est Nottingham, in Chester county, in which a number of young persons were in- structed in the languages and sciences, and some in particular trained up to usefulness and honour in the Christian church §. Before the institution of these academies, that is, anterior to the year 1730, there was very little * The rev. Samuel Blair was a n;*"ive of Ireland. He came to America very early in life, and was one of Mr. Tennant's pupils, in his academy at Neshaniiny. He was considered not only as ©ne of the most learned and able, but also as one of the most venerable, pious, and excellent men of his day? f Among the distinguished characters who received their clas- sical and theological education at this seminary, were the rev, Samtjel Davies, afterwards president of the college of New Jersey ; the rev. Dr. Rogers, of ZSew York ; the rev. Messrs. Alexander Cummings, James Finley, Hugh Henry> and a number of other respectable clergymen. ;|: The rev. Dr. Finley, afterwards president of the college of New Jersey, was a native of Ireland. He came to America in early life, having first received an excellent education in his native country, and a short time after his arrival was licensed by the presbytery of New Brunswick. The eminence which he subsequently attained is well known. § Some of the facts and names above stated were received by the author from his venerable colleague, the rev Dr. RogerSj and from Dr. Hugh Williamson. Sect. III.] United States of America. 203 taste for classical learning in the middle colonies of America. It is true, the number of respectable divines, physicians, and lawyers, was not small, but the greater part of those who had attained to any eminence had received their education in Eu- rope, and almost all the instructors in academies or schools were emigrants from Great Britain or Ireland. But from this period a new era com- menced. Native Americans began to discover a taste for both ancient and modern literature, and the interests of liberal knowledge began to assume a more promising aspect. It is generally known that the clergy, in all civilised nations, are the chief promoters of the instruction of youth. Accordingly, it is a remark- able fact, that in all those parts of our country in which the clergy are most numerous, pious, and exemplary, literature is most popular ; and in re- viewing the literary history of the several Ame- rican states, we find that useful knowledge has been most early and most generally encouraged in those parts of the country in which clergymen of good character were most early and generally settled. This remark was strikingly confirmed and exemplified in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, at the period of which we are now speaking. The exertions made by some of the clergy of these colonies, at this period, for the promotion of lite- rature, M^ere unwearied and persevering, and de- serve the most grateful acknowledgements. The synod of Philadelphia embarked in this cause with great zeal. They particularly favoured the aca- demies of Dr. Allison and Mr. Blair, before men- tioned. To the former they agreed to pay a 204 Natiojis lately become Literary. [Cn. XXVI. certain sum annually, that he might be enabled to render his seminary more extensive in its plan, and especially to educate for the service of the church such pious young men as might not be able of themselves to bear the expense of an aca- demic course *. But the clerg}'- and others of the presbyterian church, soon fmding that the provision heretofore made by them for the encouragement of literature v/as inadequate, began to form designs of more extensive and permanent utility. In the year 1746 a plan of a college was formed by a few distinguished clergymen of this denomination, in the states of New York and New Jersey f , aided * When Dr. Allison, after a few years, removed to Philadel- phia, and was appointed vice-provost of the college erected there, his academy at Nexv London was transferred to Neiv Ark, a plea- sant village in the state of Delaware, where it was put under the care of the rev. Mr. M'Dowell, a respectable presbyterian clergy- man, 'who had received his education at the university of Edin- burgh. This institution continued for a number of j^ears under the patronage of the presbyterian church ; and was the means of forming a number of excellent scholars, not only for the Go- spel ministry, but also for the other learned professions. t Among these were, 1. The rev. Jonathan Dickinson, a na- tive of Connecticut, and an alumnus of Yale college; a man of learning, of distinguished talents, and much celebrated as a , preacher. He was for some years minister of the presbyterian church at Elizabeth Town, in New Jersey. 2. The rev. Aaron Burr, also a native of Connecticut, and a graduate of Yale college, who was called, in 1742, to take charge of the Presbyterian church at New Ark, in New Jersey, and who was so eminent as an able and learned divine, and an accomplished scholar, that he was afterwards unanimously elected president of the college ■which he was instrumental in founding. He was the father of Aaron Burr, esq., the present vice-president of the United States. 2. The rev. Ebcnczcr Pemberton, a native of Massach'-'settSj and Sect. III.] United States of America. 205 by some gentlemen of literary character and liberal views, of the same religious commmiion*. The charter was obtained, and the college com- menced its labours in Elizabeth Town, New Jer- sey, in the year above mentioned, under the pre- sidency of the rev. Jonathan Dickinson, who was then pastor of the presbyterian church in that town. Mr. Dickinson dying the next year, the college was removed to New Ark, in the same province, and the rev. Mr. Burr elected to the office of president; from which place it was finally removed in 17«57 to Princeton, which had been a son of Harvard college, a man of respectable abilities and in- formation. He was, at this time, pastor of the presbyterian church in the city of New York, from which he removed to Bos- ton, and died, many years afterwards, minister of a church in that town. * The most distinguished of the lay gentlemen who aided in the erection of this college, by their councils, property, and in- fluence, were the three following: 1. William Smith, esq., a na- tive of England, who came to America about the year 1715, and received a liberal education in Yale college. He was bred a lawyer ; attained great eminence at the bar, both for erudition and eloquence, and was afterwards one of the judges of the supreme court of the province. 2. Pet«r Vanbrugh Livingston, esq., a native of New York, and descended from one of the oldest and most respectable families who migrated thither from Great Bri- tain. He also received his education at Yale college, and was long distinguished as a judicious, well informed, and public-spi- rited man. 3. William Peartree Smith, esq., also a native of New York, a man of considerable talents and reading. It is believed he was an alumnus of the same college. At the period of which we are speaking he resided in New York, but afterwards re^ moved to New Jersey, where, after sustaining a number of public honours, he died a few years ago. Beside these, some other laymen might be mentioned who were animated with a lite- rary spirit, and embarked with zeal in the same caus? ; but our limits forbid more minute details. i06 Natiojis lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. agreed upon as its permanent situation *. The circumstances attending the establishment of this college; the zeal for the promotion of literature^ which was indicated by its erection, and which it served afterwards greatly to increase; and the many distinguished characters which it has con- tributed to form, render it, beyond all doubt, one of the most conspicuous institutions in America, and one of those the history and influence of which are most worthy of being traced. While these measures for the advancement of literature were proceeding thus favourably, Ben- jamin Franklin f appeared in Pennsylvania, and began to distinguish himself by his exertions for promoting useful knov»dedge. The original genius of this celebrated man ; his sound practical under- standing ; his scientific discoveries; and his zeal and unwearied assiduity in forwarding every pur- * It ought not to pass unnoticed, that the middle colonies were much indebted for their progress in literature, at this time, to New England. The first three presidents of New Jersey college were born and educated in that country, as were also a consi- derable number of the other active and enlightened promoters of learning then residing in New York, New Jersey, and Penn- sylvania. f Benjamin Franklin was born in Boston in the year 1706. He first came to Philadelphia in the autumn of 1723, in the cha- racter of a journe\aiian printer; established himself tliere in this business on his own account in 1729, and soon began to print a newspaper. In 1732 he commenced the publication of Toor Richard's Almanac ; and from this time till about the year 1752, when he made his grand discoveries in electricity, was gradually rising in reputation and usefulness. His political character and activity, beside being irrelative to the present subject, are too well known to render any attempt to detail them in this place either necessary or projjer. Sect. III.] United States of America. 207 suit which had for its object the progress of lite- rature, are well known, and have been applauded not only ])y his countrymen, but also by the learned of all nations *. North America in gene- ral, and in particular Pennsylvania, owes a large debt of gratitude to this man. He had great in- fluence in awakening and directing the attention of those around him to literature, science, and useful arts of every kind. He was one of the first native Americans who succeeded in cultivating an easy, unafifected, and polished style of writing-j-. * A late writer in the Monthly Magazine (see the Supplement to vol. xiv), among other severe remarks on the state of Ame- rican literature, afiects to speak with great contempt of the character and writings of Dr. Franklin, An essay which dis- covers so much ignorance, weakness, and inconsistency would liot be noticed in this place, did it not ail'ord an opportunity of doing justice to a man to whom his country owes much. That the character and opinions of Dr. Franklin were, in all respects, faultless, is by no means contended. This was far from being the case. But that he had an original genius, a strong mind, and much practical wisdom ; that he made many valuable contribu- tions to science and the arts; and that his writings have been much read, translated into various languages, and quoted with respect by the learned of foreign countries, can be questioned by no one who is not as ignorant as he is prejudiced. f The anonymous writer above mentioned, after bestowing a number of severe epithets on the American style of writing, some of which are not altogether unmerited, represents its writers as having generally formed their manner after that of Dr. Franklin. It is scarcely possible to conceive of a remark more unfounded, or that discovers a more entire unacquaintance witli the subject which he undertakes to discuss. It is generally known to well informed persons, that Franklin, as he tells us himself in his ac- count of his own life, took the style of Mr. Addison for his mo- del ; and though he was far from attaining a style equal to that of the illustrious British essayist, yet he certainly wrote with an f^ase, simplicity, sprightliness, purity, and perspicuity, highl}- 208 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. He was the projector and founder of some of the most useful literary institutions which Ame- ll^ica can boast; and may Justly be considered as having given an impulse to the public mind, in favour of liberal knowledge, which forms a di- stinguished era in the history of that country. Hitherto scarcely any native American had at- tracted attention among the learned of Europe, or by his writings or discoveries turned their eyes to this new world. The first persons who attained this honour, in any considerable degree, were the rev. Air. Jonathan Edvrards*, the celebrated respectable, and very diiTerent from the aflectation, the bombast, and the perpetual use of unauthorised terms and phrases, which characterise too many American Avriters in later times, and from which some popular writers of Great Britain are by no means exempt. * The rev. Jonathan Edwards was born at Windsor, in Con- necticut, October 5, 1703. He received his education at Yale collesre, where he irraduated bachelor of arts in 1720. He earlv began to preach, and the presbytcrian church of New York, then in its infancy, had the honour of enjoying his ministrations for eight months, in the year 1723. He afterwards became the. pastor of a congregational church at Northampton, in Ma?ia- chusetts; and in 1757 M-as chosen president of the college of New Jersey, in which office he continued till his death, which took place March 22, 1738, in the fifty-fifth year of his age. This illustrious man was very respectably learned in the Latin, Greek, and Hebrew languages, and a'so in the mathematics, and natural philoscphy ; but in theological, moral, and metaphysical science, he discovered an acuteness, vigour, and comprehensive- ness of mind, which decidedly place him in the very first rank of great men belonging to the age in which he lived. He read Locke's Essay on Human Understanding at thirteen years of age, and declared to an intimate friend a short time before his death,, that, at that early age, " he was as much engaged, and had more tleasure in studyi"Dg this work; than the most greexly miser could Sect. III.] United Stales of America. 209 theological and metaphysical writer, and Dr. Ben- jamin Franklin. Though the genius, talents, and general character of no two persons could be more different, yet each in his way gained high and extensive celebrity, and for the first time con- vinced the literati of foreign countries, thut Ame- rica had given birth to philosophers who were capable of instructing them. The arrival in America of the rev. Mr. George Berkeley, then dean of Derry, afterward bishop of Cloyne, deserves to be noticed in the literary history of America, not only as a remarkable event, but also as one which had some influence on the progress of literature, particularly in Ilhode Island and Connecticut. This great man, in 1729, nineteen years after the publication of the celebrated work in which he denied the ex- istence of the material world, came to America with a particular view to the establishment of an episcopal college, to aid in the missionary cause *. He landed at Newport, in Rhode Island, have in gatlioring up handfuls of silver or gold from a newly discovered mine." The fruits of this early initiation into me- taphysical science were afterwards laid before the public in his Inquiry into the Freedom of the Will, S^c, a work which has been pronounced " one of the greatest efforts of the human mind," which was received with high approbation in Europe ; and which has been, ever since its publication, quoted as a great standard work on the subject of which it treats. * Dr. Berkeley was born in Ireland in the year 1684-, and re- ceived his education at Trinity college, Dublin. About the year 172t he was made dean of Derry; and in 1725 published A plan, which he pursued with great zeal, of establishing a col- lege in one of the Bermudas, or Summer Islands, the principal objects of which were, the obtaining a better supply of mission- aries for the coloaies, and the conversion of the American Indi- VOL. III. P 210 Nalions lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. and purchased a country seat and farm in the neighbourhood of that town, where he resided about two years and a half: and though va- rious circumstances discouraged him from pro- secuting his original design, and induced him to return to Europe without eiYecting it, yet his visit was by no means without its utility. The presence and conversation of a man so illustrious for talents, learning, virtue, and social attractions, could not fail of giving a spring to the literary diligence and ambition of many who enjoyed his acquaintance. He visited the various 1 iterary in- stitutions vyhich came within his reach, and wrote and spoke in their favour, as opportunities were afforded, and their exigencies required. lie exer- ans to Christianity. The plan was favourably received^ not only by his friends, but also by the government. Ho obtained a charter for the proposed college, in which he was named as the first president; and also a parliamentary grant of 20000/. ster- ling for its support. In the month of February, in the year 1729, he came to America for the purpose of putting his plan into ex- ecution, and brought with him his lady, whom he had married but a few months before. Soon after his arrival he became con- vinced that the plan of establishing the proposed college in the Bermuda isles was by no means an eligible one; he therefore \vrote to his friends in England, requesting them to obtain an al- teration in the charter, fixing the institution on some part of th«, American continent (which would probably have been New York), and soliciting the immediate payment of the sum which had been granted for its establishment. Findjng, however, after a delay of two years and a half, that there was no probability of the money being paid, and considering his plan as impracticable, he embarked at Boston in September 1731, and returned to En- gland. In 1733 he was promoted to the bishopric of Cloyne, and in January 1753 he died in the city of Oxford, universally respected and lamented. While he resided at Rhode Island, he coHiposed his Alciphron, or Minute Philosopher. Sk CT. III.] United States of America. 211 cised particular munificence toward Yale college, to which his attention was directed by one of the trustees of the institution with whom he was ac- quainted, and also by the rev. Mr. Williams, then president of the college, with whom he corre- sponded. Soon after his return to Europe he sent, as a gift to this college, a deed of the farm which he held in Rhode Island, which he directed to be appropriated to the maintenance of the three best classical scholars who should reside at college at least nine months in a year, in each of the three years, between their fn'st and second degrees * ; and all surplussages of money, arising from accidental vacancies, to be distributed in Greek and Latin books to such under graduate students as should make the best composition or declamation in the Latin tongue, upon such a moral theme as should be given them. This do- nation is still held by the college, and the distri- bution of the Dean's Bounty is annually and faith- fully performed, agreeably to the directions of the donor.- While at Newport, the dean also pre- sented a copy of his own v/orks to the college library; and after his return to Europe, partly out of his own estate, but principally with monies which he procured for the jDurpose by donation * The dean directed, that on the sixth of May annually, or, in case that should be Sunday, on the seventh, the candidates for this bounty should be publicly examined by the president oi'the college, and the senior episcopal missionary within the colony who should then be present; and in case none should be present, then by the president only : and in case the president and senior missionary should not agree in deciding on the best aeholar:, that then the case should be decided by lot. P2 212 Nations latelij heco7ne Literary. [Ch. XXVI. in England, he made an additional present of nearly one thousand volumes to the same li- brary *, In 1748 a public library was established at Newport, in Rhode Island, by Abraham Red- wood, esq,, an opulent gentleman, who wished to encourage literature. It was founded for the use of all denominations of Christians indiscrimi- nately : a company was afterwards incorporated by the legislature, for the purpose of holding and superintending it ; and large additions were made to it by donations from Europe and elsewhere. This library afforded to the inhabitants of Rhode Island means of literary improvement which they had never before enjoyed; and no doubt contri- buted something to the extension of a taste for letters and science in that colony f . The influence of Dr. Franklin's literary zeal and industry soon began to display itself in Pennsyl- vania. In 1742, an association, which had been formed at his instance, and by his unwearied ex- ertions some time before, was incorporated, by the name of " The Library Company of Phila- lielphia." This institution was greatly encouraged * The attention and munificence of the clean to Yale college, ^vhen considered in all its circumstances, reflects much honour on his disinterestedness and liberality. When it is considered that he ^^tls warmly attached to the episcopal church, and that he came to America for the express purpose of founding an epis- rtipal college ; his Catholicism, in patronising an institution under the exclusive direction of a different denomination, will appear worthy of high praise. t Thi3 library, which bore the name of its founder, was in a great measure destroyed during the revolutionary war. Sect, III.] United States of America. 21a by the friends of literature in America and in Great Britain. Valuable contributions were made to it, not only by Franklin, and his literary friends and countrymen, but also by his corre- spondent Mr. Collinson, by Thomas and Richard Penn, and others. From that period to the pre- sent it has been continually growing ; and now, in conjunction with the Loganian library, forms the largest and best collection of books in the United States*. In 1749 Dr. Franklin drew up tlie plan of an academy, to be erected in the city of Philadel- phia, which was adopted and liberally encou- raged ; and the seminary was established ^n the beginning of the following year. In 1153, through the interposition of his learned and phi- losophic friend Mr. Collinson f , a charter was obtained for this academy, from the proprietors of the province, accompanied with a liberal do- nation towards its funds. In 17«5o an additional charter was granted, extending the plan of the * The city librarj/ of Philadelphia contains, at present, between eleven and twelve thousand volumes — say eleven thousand five hundred. The Lo^rt?»zVm library consists of about three thou- sand five hundred, making in the whole a collection of fifteen thousand volumes. f Peter Collinson, F. Jl-S., was a native of Westmoreland, ai^d resided the greater part of his life in London. lie was much distinguished by his fondjiess for natural history, and also Ijy his desire and exertions to promote literature and science in the American colonies. He long -maintained a friendly correspon- dence witii lieutenant-governor Golden of NewYorJc, and with Dr. Franklin, as well as with other American gentlemen. He d^ed in 1768. 214 Nations lately become Literarx). [Ch, XXVX institution, and forming it into a college *. The first provost was the rev. Dr. William Smith f , whose popular talents, and taste in polite litera- ture, contributed greatly to raise the character of the college. He was principally assisted by the rev. Dr. Francis Allison, who had been called from * In the establishment of this seminary on its original plan, and in finally erecting it into a college. Dr. Franklin is said to have been chiefl}^ aided by the councils and exertions of chief justice Allen, wfio Avas much distinguished as a friend to litera- ture ; by Thomas Hopkinson, esq., one of the governor's council ; by the rev. Richard Peters, secretary of the province ; by Tench Francis, esq., attorney-general; and by Dr. Phineas Bond, an eminenf physician ; all residing in Philadelphia. f The rev. Dr. William Smith was a native of Scotland, and received his education at the university of Aberdeen, where he graduated in March 1747. The three following years he spent in teaching in one of the parochial schools of that country ; and in 1750 was sent up to London, in pursuance of some plan for the better endowment of the said schools. In London he was induced to relinquish the employment in which he wa5 engaged, and to embark for America, where he soon afterward arrived. Here he was employed upwards of two years as a private tutor in the family of governor Martin, on Long Island, in the province of New York. In this situation he was invited to take charge of the college in Philadelphia, to which he consented; and after revisiting England, and receiving regular ordination in the epis- copal church (which took place in December 1753), he returned to America; and in the month of May, 1754-, was placed at the head of this infant seminary. The talents of this gentleir,an, and his histoiy, from the time of his induction into the office of pro- vostjfuntil his death, in the montTi of May ] 803, are generally known. He gave important aid in the formation and establish-, ment of another college in the state of Maryland ; and certainly rendered important services to the literary interests of America. It is expected that his loorks, in several volumes, will soon be laid before the public. Sect. III.] United States of America. 215 his academy, before mentioned, to the office of vLceprovost in this seminary ; and who, perhaps, still more eminently contributed to its reputation for solid learning and useful knowledge. The effects of this establishment in awakening the attention of the public to the interests of learning, and in exciting a taste for literature in Pennsylvania, were soon visible. The first com- mencement took place in a short time after the second charter was obtained, when the honours of the institution were conferred on six young gentlemen *, most of whom became afterward both conspicuous ^nd useful literary charac- ters, and were honourable pledges of the be- nign effects which this college w^as destined to produce on the literature and science, not only of Pennsylvania, but also of the neighbouring states. It has already been mentioned, that Dr. Frank- Im's exertions were eminently usefuj '\\\ promot- ing the cause of liberal knowledge in Pennsylva- nia. His experiments on electricity \yere pecu- liarly fitted to awaken and stimulate the public mind, and were actually found to produce this effect, in a very remarkable degree, both in Eu- rope and America, He was soon joined by Mr. Thomas Hopkinson, the rev. Ebenezer Kinners- ley, Mr. Philip Syng, and others, who also be- came distinguished by their experiments in the same branch of philosophy. Mr. Kinnersley was ■• * These were, Jacob Duche, Samuel Magaw, James Latta, Hugh Williamson, Francis Hopkiiison, and Hall. The first three became eminent clergymen; and two of the others have been long celebrated in America, for their literary attain- jnents, and their useful services in civil life;. 5216 Nations lately become Liter aj-y. [Ch. XXVI, afterward appointed a professor in the college of Philadelphia, and was one of the active promoters of useful knowledge of his day *. In the province of New York the interests ofli' terature had been more than commonly neglected before the middle of the eighteenth century. Few of the first settlers had any literary taste or ac- quirements; and though now and then an indi- vidual came to the province from Europe, who was learned, and disposed to cultivate letters f, yet the number of these was so small, and the great body of the inhabitants so little willing to second any endeavours which they might make for the advancement of knowledge, that every thing relating to education was in the most deplo- rable state. Some of the more wealthy inhabi- tants sent their sons to Holland, or to Great Bri- tain, to be educated; while a few others, to whom this would have been inconvenient, placed their * Mr. Kinnersley was bred a baptist, and was for some time a preacher of that denomination ; but afterward, taking some of- fence, he left the baptist communion, laid aside his clerical cha- racter, and joined the episcopal church. -f- Governor Stuy vesant appears to have been a man of respec- table attainments in literature. Out of the small number of cler- gymen who came to the province in early times, a few had made considerable acquirements in letters. The ancestors of the Rens- salaer, the Bayard, the Livingston, and the Morris families, and a few others, who first came to the colony, had also been liberally fducated. Two or three of the governors, who were sent at dif- ferent times, were fond of literature, and made some exertions to promote it. Of this character, especially, was governor Burnet. To these might be added some other names, did our limits allow of more minute details. But the influence of these could not be great, \vhen the mass of the people were regardless of every lite« rary object. Sect. III.] United Slates of America. 217 children in Yale college. From these sources almost all the natives of New York, who, prior to the middle of the eighteenth century, enjoyed the advantages of a liberal education, had re- ceived the elements of knowledge. In the year 1729 a small lil>rary was sent over to the city of New York, by the " Society for pro- pagating the Gospel in foreign parts," for the use of the clergy, and other gentlemen of this and the neighbouring governments of Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. This was the first public library that was introduced into the province ; and it doubtless contributed, in some degree, to awaken and extend a taste for reading. In 1754 a society was established in the city of New York, for the purpose of forming a pub- lic library on a larger scale, and upon a more liberal plan. This association soon received the countenance of the public, and immediately be- gan to collect books. The library, thus begun, has continued to grow to the present time, and now holds the third place among the public libra? ries of the United States*. This establishment furnished the first opportunity enjoyed by the citizens of New York, in general, of obtaining access to a large collection of books. About this time some of the inhabitants of New York (the greater part, if not all, belonging to the episcopal church), began to form the de- sign of establishing a seminary of learning on a * The Philadelphia librarj'-, includiiig the Loganian, contains about fifteen thousand volumes ; the library belonging to Har- %'ard college about thirteen thousand j and the library of New "York about seven thousancl. £18 Nations hteli^ become Literajy. [Ch. XXV^I* more extensive plan than any which had hitherto been known in tlie province. Animated by the exertions made to found a college at Philadel- phia, they undertook to erect a similar institu- tion in their ov/n city. At the head of the asso- ciation formed for this purpose was Mr. James de Lancey *, lieutenant-governor of the province, who, beside the aid of the rev. Dr. Barclay f, and other literary gentlemen of New York, was also assisted by the counsels and cooperation of the rev. Dr. Johnson J, of Connecticut, and the * Mr. James de Lancey was a native of New York. His fa- ther, Mr. Stephen de Lancey, came from Normandy, in France, among the protestants who fled from persecution in that country. The son was sent to England for his education, where, about the year 1725, he entered the university of Cambridge. Here he had the honour of having for his tutor Dr. Plerring, afterward archbishop of Canterbury. Soon after his return home in 1729, he was appointed a member of the governor's council ; after- ward filled the office of chief justice ; became lieutenant-gover- nor in 1753 J and had long an extensive and commanding in» fluence in the province. He died about the year 1700. t The rev. Dr. Henry Barclay was a native of xllbany, and received a liberal education at Yale college, where he graduated in the year 1734'. Soon after leaving college he went to Great Britain, where he received orders in the episcopal church, andf was appointed missionary to the Mohawk Indians. Having served m this capacity for some years, he was called to the city of New York, and appointed rector of Trinity church. In this respectable situation he continued till his death, which took place hi 1765. J The rev. Dr. Samuel Johnson was born at Guilford, in Con- necticut, October 1 4, 1696. He was educated at Yale college, where he took his first degree in the year 1714-. In 1720 he was ordained by a council of congregational ministers, and installed pastor of a church at West Haven, in Connecticut. After re- maining in this situation a little more than two years, he altered his views concerning the doctrine, worship, and government of Sect. III.] United States of Amerkct. 219 rev. Dr. Chandler*, of New Jersey. In the be- ginning of the year 1 753, an act of assembly was passed for the establishment of the college, and making some provision, by a succession of lot- teries, for its support. In October 1754 a regu- lar charter of incorporation was obtained, and the rev. Dr. Johnson named therein as the first the church with which he was connected, and went to England, where he took orders in the episcopal church in the month of March 1723. From this time till the year 1754, Dr. Johnson resided at Stratford, in Connecticut, where he had the pastoral care of an episcopal church. In the last mentioned year he re- moved to New Yorkj and entered on the duties of his office as president of King's college. In this station he continued till Fe- bruary 1763, when he resigned, returned to Stratford, and there again exercised his ministry till his death, which happened in January 1772. Dr. Johnson Avas a man of distinguished talents and learning. He was intimately acquainted with dean Berkeley, during his residence in Rhode island ; long maintained a frieni;lly correspondence with him ; and became a convert to the pecujiar metaphysical opinions of that great man. Beside other smaller work?, he published a Compendium of Logic, and another of JEthic&, which were printed together in an octavo volume in 1752, by Dr. Franklin, then residing in Philadelphia. He also published aHcbrezv Gramtnar in 1107, which evinced an accurate acquaintance with that language. — For this account of Dr. John- son, as well as for some other facts and names in the history of American literature, the author is indebted to a manuscript Life of Dr. Johnson, drawn up by the rev. Dr. Chandler, mentioned in the following note. ■^' The rev. Dr. Thomas Bradbury Chandler was a native of Connecticut, and received his education in Yale college, where he graduated master of arts in the year 1745. He soon after- ward went to England, took orders in the episcopal church, and settled in the ministry at Elizabeth Town, New Jersey, ■where lie long maintained a high character both for talents and erudition. He was honoured with the degree of doctor of divi- nity by the university of Oxford. His respectable and useful life terminated in the year 1790. 220 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. president. He entered on the duties of his office in the month of July the same year, and held the first commencement in June 1758, when eight young gentlemen, alumni of the college, were ad- mitted to its honours*. The corporation of Trinity church, in the city of New York, early countenanced this college, and made a valuable donation to its funds. The institution also received important aid from the honourable Joseph Murray f, one of his majes- ty's council, and attorney-general for the pro- vince. He was a great friend to literature, and left the whole of his estate, consisting of books, lands, and other property, to the college. The names of some other benefactors, but less conspi- cuous than these, are to be found on the records of the institution. From this period we may date the rise of a literary spirit in the province of New York. It is true, this spirit was possessed for a long time afterward by comparatively few individuals, and produced -effects by no means so general or im- portant as the friends of knowledge could wish \ but from this time the advantages of liberal edu- cation were more frequently enjoyed in the pro- * The names of these young gentlemen are, Samuel Ver- planck, Rudolphiis Ritzema, Philip van Cortlandt, Samuel Pro,- voost, Joshua Bloomer, Joseph Reed, Josiah Ogden, and Isaac Ogden. t Joseph Murray, esq., was a native, it is believed, of Great Britahi, and received his education there. The \alue of the estate which he left to the college amounted to ab(?lit ten thour^ sand pounds New York currency, or twenty-five thousand dollars. Sect. III.] United States of America. S2I viiice, and some of those who w^ere destined after- ward to fdl the most conspicuous stations, began to receive at home that instruction which before could only be received in other colonies, or in European seminaries. The interests of literature were at this time going on prosperously in Massachusetts. A ie.\i years before, Mr. Thomas Hollis*, of London, an. active friend to literature, as well as to civil and religious liberty, had made several valuable dona- tions to the university of Cambridge. He was followed in this munificence by his nephew, of the same benevolent disposition. To these generous benefactors that institution owes much. They esta- blished two professorships, one of theology, the other of mathematics and natural philosophy ; they gave many valuable books to the uni- versity library f ; and made other presents of considerable value. One of the college buildings erected in 1762 was called, in memory of these benefactors, Hollis Hall. While the Hollis family exercised this genero- sity towards the institution, benefactors were not wanting in America to imitate their laudable mu- f The library of Harvard college took its rise soon after that institution was founded. In 17 64- it consisted of about five thousand volumes. In the winter of that year the greater part of this library was destroyed by fire, with one of the col- lege buildings. Since that time it has been gradually growing, and now consists of about thirteen thousand volumes. The chief contributors to this library were the Hollis family, Tho- mas Hancock, esq., governor Bowdoin, Dr. Franklin, and several 6t tiers. t22 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVt, mficence. Thomas Hancock*, esq., of Boston, founded a professorship of oriental languages, and continbuted generously to the enlargem congress, in the thirty seventh year of his age. * The author regrets, that it is not in his power to give a more complete catalogue of the writers on the American controversy. Many well written pamphlets on both sides of this question were published anonymously. This was especially the case with those who wrote in favour of the British claims; so that out of the large number who belong to the latter class, only lieutenant- governor Hutchinson and Mr. Galloway are sufficiently knowi to be particularly mentioned. ^2o() Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. against the common enemy were now turned to- wards domestic improvement. In 1780 an act passed the legislature of Mas- •sachusetts for establishing the American Academy ohool establishments m that state than he had before received. Sect. III.] United States of America. 261 racters and manners being less homogeneous, they have made less progress towards maturuig and perfecting their school establishments than the eastern states. It may not be improper to take notice of some of those branches of science and literature which have been most cultivated in the United States ; and also of the names of those \A\o have been principally distinguished by their attention to these objects. In Mathematics, Astro7wmjij^ and the more ab- struse departments of Mechanical Philosophy^ America has been distinguished to a degree w hieh, all things considered, is highly honourable to its genius and diligence. The names of Green- wood, AVinthrop, Bowdoin *, Willard, Fobcs, and others of Massachusetts ; of West of Rhode Island ; of Clap, and Mansfield, of Connecticut ; of AVilliam Alexander, commonly called lord Stirling f, of New Jersey; of Godfrey, Ritten- * James Bowdoin, LL.D. F. R. S., was born at Boston, INIassa- chusetts, August 18, 1727. His father was a native of France, and fled among the persecuted protestants of that country, first to Ireland, and afterwards to New England, M'here he arrived in the year 1688. His son James, the object of our present atten- tion, was educated at Harvard college, where he received his first degree in 1745. After filling some important stations iu public life, he v\as chosen governor of Massachusetts in 1785 and 1786. He died in 1790, greatly and generally respected. Those who have perused the Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences will recollect the several papers contained in them, which manifest no common taste and talents in astro- nomical inquiries. f William Alexander, e!Tq., was a native of the city of New York, but spent a considerable part of his life in New Jersey. Ho was con-iJcred, bv nunv, as the righifid ho.ii to the tide and 262 N'ations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI- house, Evving, Williamson, Patterson, and Elli- cott, of Pennsj'h ania ; and of Madison, Page, and several more of Virginia, are so well and so respectably known, that it is unnecessary to en- large on their merits*. Beside the learning and talents of these native citizens, lieutenant-gover- nor Golden, mentioned in several former chapters, and professor Minto f, both of North Britain, de- estate of an earldom in Scotland, of which country his father was a native; and although when he went to North Britain in pur- suit of this inheritance, he failed of obtaining an acknowledg- ment of his claim by government; yet, among his friends and acquaintances, he received, by courtesy, the title of lord Stirling. He discovered an early fondness for the study of mathematics and astronomy, and attained great eminence in these sciences. * The author, in this list, has only introduced the names of such mathematicians, astronomers, &c., as, by means of some publication or other display of their learning and talents, ap- peared to him to have made themselves more than usually known. He is sensible that a number of the professors of these branches of knowledge in the colleges, both native citizens and foreigners, stand high in the estimation of all Avho know them ; and though not brought so immediately before the public, yet possess perhaps a degree of erudition and skill little if at all in- ferior to those possessed by the persons above named. t Walter Minto, LL. D., was a native of Scotland, and received a liberal education in that country. Early in life he visited Italy, and spent a number of years at Pisa, pursuing, with great diligence, his mathematical and astronomical studies. Soon after the close of tRe revolutionary war, he came to America, and about the year 1787 was appointed professor o^ inai'iemaiics and n\vell known. They have undergone a num- ber of impressions. * Beside the more formal volumes of sermons above mention- ed, it would be easy to select smaller collections of discourses on particular subjects, which do honour to the genius, learning, and taste of their respective authors; and the single sermons of merit are much more numerous ; but it is obviously impossible to indulge such minujte details, consistently with the requisite brevity. Sect. III.] United States of America, 269 have been executed in the United States. Among many others who might be mentioned as distin- guished for their classic learning and taste, it would be improper to omit the name of Charles Thomson, esq.*, late secretary of the American congress. The erudition and skill of this gentle- man, especially in Greek literature, do honour to his country. He has completed a translation of the Septiiagint version of the Old Testament Scriptures, and of the original of the New Testa- ment, which the friends of biblical literature in America hope soon to see published ; and which, in the opinion of good judges, will be a valuable acquisition to sacred criticism. Of Oriental Literature the votaries in America have been few, and of the fruits of their erudition little has been laid before the pu])lic. With re- gard, indeed, both to classic and oriental litera- ture, the country has rather lost than gained ground within the last hundred years. For though a greater number of persons now gain a smatter- ing of classic literature than at the beginning of the century ; yet of those who pay attention to this study, much fewer are deeply and thoroughly instructed. And with respect to oriental learn- ing, those who have any tolerable acquaintance with it in the United States are rare indeed. To the names of those Americans mentioned in former parts of this work, who w^ere distinguished by their knowledge of the Hebrew language, * This gentleman received the rudiments of his education at the academy of Dr. Francis Allison, before mentioned, where he was associated in study with Dr. Ewing, governor M'Kean, and a number of other Americans of literary distinction. 270 Nations lately become Literary, [Ch. XXVI. that of the rev. Dr. Stiles, president of Yale col- lege, may be added. At the time of his death, he probably left no superior among his country- men in this branch of literature *. It has been asserted, and probably with truth, that in Political science, and in Parliamentary eloquence, the United States will bear a very ho- nourable comparison with any nation. Beside the eminent political writers mentioned in a former page, the names of Adams, Hamilton, Madison, Jay, and several other native citizens, are known and celebrated in Europe. In addi- tion to these, many counsellors and juridical cha- racters might be enumerated, who not only hold a high station in their own country, but who would also be considered as ornaments of the bar and the bench, in the most enlightened countries of Europe. * Ezra Stiles, D. D. and LL. D., was born at North Haven, in Connecticut, December 10, 1727. He was educated at Yale college, where he received the degree of A. B. in the year 1746. He was ordained to the work of the Gospel ministry, and install- ed pastor of a church at Newport, Rhode Island, in 1755 ; and was chosen president of the college at which he had received his education in 1777; in v/hich important office he continued till his death, in 1795. Dr. Stiles was one of the most learned men that his country ever produced. He had a great amount of general knowledge, but he was particularly attached to ori- ental literature. Beside an acquaintance v.ith the Hebrew lan- guage more than commonly extensi\'B and profound, very few on that side of the Atlantic ever made so great progress in the knowledge of the Arabic, Chaldaic, Syriac, and Samaritan dia- lects; and on the Persic and Coptic he had bestowed some atten- tion. He corresponded with learned rabbis in the Hebrew lan- guage, and revived the study of it in the college over which he presided. For upwards of thirty years he held a distinguished place among the active friends and promoters of literature in the United State!;-. Sect. III.] United States of America. ^71 The Historians of America were enumerated in a former chapter, and some references made to. their respective merits *. None of them, in- deed, can boast of having attained that elaborate polish, and that exquisite felicity of manner which distinguish the first class of English historians. But most of them are respectable writers ; and several have acquitted themselves in a manner which does credit to their taste in composi- tion as well as to their fidelity in collecting and communicating information f. The respectable Poets of America are not nu- merous. The most conspicuous of these were noticed in a preceding division of this work J. It is not necessary here to repeat their names, or to attempt a comparative estimate of their merits. Their number is gradually increasing § ; and when that leisure and encouragement shall be afforded to men of genius there, which are en- * See vol. ii. f Histories of clifTerent American states have been promised by several writers. The public particularly look forward with high expectation to the appearance of The History of North Ca- rolina, which has been for some time prepared by Dr. Hugh Williamson, whose talents and learning are a pledge that it will prove an interesting and instructive work. .X See pages 67 and 68 of this volume. § Since the close of the eighteenth century, another writer has appeared, who, if we may judge by his first production, is de- stined to hold a high place in the catalogue of native poets of America. This Avriter is the rev. John B. Linn, D. D., of Phila- delphia, whose Powers of Genius, a didactic and descriptive poem, published in ]80i, displays imagination, taste, and read- ing. This poem was so favourably received, that a second edi- tion was called for in less than a year, into which the author has introduced large and valuable improvements. 1272 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. joyed in many parts of Europe, it may expect to produce poets, who shall vie with the most celebrated of the old world.' But in no respect does the literary enterprise of America appear more conspicuous than in the rapid increase of the number and circulation of Newspapers, within the last thirty years. The ratio and amount of this increase were stated in another place*. In this respect it goes beyond every other nation. It were well if these vehicles of information had improved as much in purity, intelligence, and instructiveness, as in other re- spects ; but the blindest partiality for American literature must perceive and lament the sad re- verse ! It may not be improper to attempt, in a. few sentences, a comparative estimate of the ex- tent to which different branches of knowledge are cultivated in different parts of the United States. That amount of knowledge which is usually ac- quired at common schools, viz. reading, writing, and arithmetic, is more generally diffued among all classes of the people in New England, and par- ticularly in Massachusetts and Connecticut, than in any other portion of the country, and indeed than in any other part of the globe. This may \)Q ascribed to the superior excellence of their school establishments; to the number, piety, and diligence of the clergy ; to the regular organisa- tion of their towns and parishes; to the honour- able point of light in which the instructors of * See pages 91 and 92 of tlie present volume. Sect. III.] United States of America. 273 youth are considered * ; and to the p^eiieral spirit of activity and enterprise which must be admitted to enter into tlie national character of New En- gland. It may also be observed, as another circum- stance of discrimination, that in the eastern states a larger portion of the youth pass tin'ough a regu- lar collegiate course of education, than in any other part of the country. In New England, the mass of the people are more generally taught to respect literature, and to make exertions for con- ferrincr this advantacrc on their children. In that part of the union, also, the expense attending an academic course is rather less than in most of the other American seminaries. These two circum- fstances have a natural tendency to fill their col- leges with a greater number of students than arc to be found elsewhere. The Classic Literature of the United States, as was before remarked, is almost every where super- ficial. It is believed, however, that the learned languages, and especially the Greek language, f This circumstance has a most benign influence in Nev/ En- gland. In the middle, but more especially in the southern states, the employment of a schoolmaster is considered by many as rather degrading, and has sometimes been used as a ground of reproach. The consequence is, that too many of the instructors of youth in these states are ignorant and vicious adventurers; those who are well qualified rather shunning an oflice to which so little respect is attached. In the New England states it is otherwise. Some of their greatest divines and statesmen were schoolmasters in early life. The employment is considered and treated as an honourable one. The consequence is, that tiie common parish schools arc generally under the care of well in- formed and virtuous men. Vol. III. T 274 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. are rather less studied in the eastern than in the middle and southern states. It is true, many more individuals attend to this branch of learn- ing in the former than in the latter ; but they read fewer books, and devote a less portion of time to the object*. For this fact, many reasons might be assigned ; but it is not necessary to mention more than two. The one i?, that, owing to the superior wealth enjoyed by a number of individuals in the middle and southern states, it was more common, during a great part of the eighteenth century, to send young men to Eu- rope for their education from those states, than •from New England. The youth, thus educated, might be expected of course to bring back with them, to their native country a larger portion of classic literature than can be easily acquired in American seminaries. Another reason is, that, while almost all the instructors of youth in New England, and especially the higher classes of them, during the last hundred years, have been natives ; a large portion of the superintendents of acade- mics, and of the presidents and professors of col- leges, in the middle and southern parts of the country, during the same period, were Europeans, and many of them eminently accomplished in classic literature. If, therefore, the knowledge in this branch of learning, acquired m the best * The author is aware, that, in tracing the literary history of New England, the names of some classical scholars of great emi- nence are found. He means, however, only to speak of the de- gree of attention generally paid to classic literature by those who go through a collegiate course in the eastern stateSjt, and espe- cially within the last twenty or thirty yeai'*. Sect. III.] United States of America. 275 seminaries of Europe, were usually more accu- rate and profound than could ordinarily be ob- tained from the native citizens, it must follow, of course, that those who derived their classical learning from the former of these sources, were in general more thoroughly instructed them- selves, and consequently more capable of instruct- ing others, than those who had access only to the latter. In the study of Oriental Literature, it is be- lieved that New England has generally excelled the middle and southern states. Certain it is, that we hear of more eminent orientalists in the former than in the latter ; if we except a few fo- reigners occasionally residing in America. This we may ascribe to the great oriental learning of several of those distinguished divines who came with the first settlers to New England, or who soon afterward followed them thither. The in- fluence of these men has continued, in some de- gree, to the present day. To this circumstance it may be added, that the university of Cambridge, in Massachusetts, is the only seminary of learning in the United States in which a professorship for instruction in the oriental languages has been steadily maintained through the whole of the eighteenth century. In the cultivation of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy, it is difiicult to say to vv'hat part of the country the preference ought to be given. Prol^ably an impartial judge, taking the whole history of the country together, would give the palm, in this respect, to Pennsylvania and Massa- cliusetts. T2 276 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. The sciences of Chemistry, Natural History, and Medicijie, have long been, and continue to be, more successfully cultivated in the middle and southern than in the eastern states. The same reasons apply in this case that were suggested with respect to classic literature. Comparatively few young men have been sent, at any period, from the eastern states to European seminaries to complete their medical education. Beside this consideration, foreigners, even of literary and scientific character, have received less encourage- ment to settle in those states than in most other parts of the union. On the other hand, from the middle and southern states a number of young men have been sent every year to the medical schools of Europe, who not only attended the or- dinary courses of instruction in Medicine, strictly so called, but also the lectures delivered on Che- mistry and Natural History, as important auxi- liary branches of philosophy. It is further to be observed, that several learned and enterprising foreigners, who visited and resided for some time in New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina, devoted much of their time and atten- tion to natural history*; excited some of the native citizens, in their respective neighbour- * There is a particular reference here to Catesby, Garden, and Walter, who resided in South Carolina ; to Mitchell, who spent a number of years in Virginia; to professor talm, who devoted several years to travelling in the middle states; to Schoepf and Wangenheim, who came to America with the Ger- man troops during the revolutionary war ; to whom may be added Dr. Golden and Dr. Muhlenberg, whose talents and zeal ill the study of botany have been before repeatedly mentioned. SSCT. III.] United States of America.' 277 hoods, to engage in this study *; and thus intro- duced that taste for inquiries of this nature which has ever since existed, in a greater or less degree, in some individuals in those states. New England has given birth to the greatest number, and the most eminent of the native Theo- logical writers of America. And there is no doubt that by far the larger portion oi\K\^ Sermons printed in the United States, whether in volumes or single discourses, is produced in that part of the coun- try. It may also be asserted, that almost all the valuable disquisitions on the Philosophy of the hu- man mind, Mhich have been published on tlie other side of the Atlantic, were written in New England, In the literature and science of Politics, it is not easy to say which part of the country is mo^t entitled to credit. If we pronounce in favour of those states, which have produced the greatest number of eminent political writers, we must give the first honours to Massachusetts, New York, Pennsjvlvania, and Virginia. But there is no subject more generally studied in every state m the union, than political science; none on Avliich their literary men so frequently MTite ; and of course none which so constantly calls iovth the exertion of talents. Of Plistorical composition, the eastern states have produced their full proportion, and rather .-*: It was probably OAving to the conversation and influence of these, or some other foreigners visiting the country, that Clayton, Starke, Cary, and Greenway, ot" Virginia; and the Bartraius, Marshall, and others, of Pennsylvania, were so much devoted to botanical pursuits. 278 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVL more. Of respectable Poets, they have given birth to a greater number than any other pro- portional division of the union. And in Belles Lettres generally, there is, without doubt, more cultivation in New England than in any other part of our country ; if v/e except the larger cities in the middle and southern states. With respect to the Mechanic Arts, New En- gland has furnished her full proportion of those inventions and improvements which do honour to American genius. And with regard to the Fine Arts, three out of Jour of our greatest native painters were born in that division of the country. It must, however, after all, be acknowledged, that what is called a liberal education in the United States is, in common, less accurate and complete; the erudition of their native citizens, with some exceptions, less extensive and profound; and the works published by Americait authors, in general, less learned, instructive, and elegant*, than are found in Great Britain, and some of the more en- lightened nations on the eastern continent. These facts, it is apprehended, arise neither from any deficiency of talents in Amerixra, nor from any in- aptitude in its soil or atmosphere to promote the grov/th of genius ; but from one or another, and in some cases from a combination, of the follow- ins: causes. * It is not meant to be denied that a few of the works pub- lished in Avncrica are as profound and instructive as any on similar subjects published elsewhere. It is simply intended to give a general character of American publications, liable to such cxce{*tions as the mind of the well informed reader will readily supply. Sect. III.] Unifed States of America. 2/9 1. Defective plans and means of instruction in the seminaries of learning. The great majority of the colleges have very inadequate funds. The consequence is, that in most of them the profes- sors are few in numl^erj and have assigned to them. too large a field of instruction, Heiice they can convey but very superficial knowledge of the va- rious branches which it is made their duty to teach ; and if well qualified themselves, which is far from being always the case, find it impossible to do justice to the pnpils. In some instances, also, the trustees or governors of American colleges, either irom their own ignorance, or in compliance with popular prejudice, have so contracted the time requisite for completing a course of instruction, as to render it necessary wholly to dispense w4th, or lightly to hurry over, some of the most impor- tant branches of knowledge. Accordingly, iu some of these institutions, mathematical science is unpopular, and the acquisition of as little as pos- sible, especially of the higher branches of it, .en- joined on the student. In others, chissic litera- ture, and especially the Greek language*, is iu low estimation, and not more studied than is in- dispensablv necessary to obtaining a diploma. If well bred scholars ever issue from such semina- ries, they must be formed by a degree of private and individual application rarely to be met with in youth. * III some American colleges, we are told that no more know- ledge of Greek is required iu those who graduate bachelor of arts, than that which maybe derived from the Grammar and the Greek Testament. 280 Kaiiojis latelij become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. 2. Want of leisure. The comparative!}'" equal distribution of property in America, while it pro- duces the most benign political and moral effects, is by no means friendly to great acquisitions in literature and science. In such a state of society, there can be few persons of leisure. It is neces- sary that almost all should be engaged in some active pursuit. Accordingly, in the United States, the greater number of those who pass through a course of what is called liberal education, in the hurried manner Avhich has been mentioned, en- gage, immediately after leaving college, in the study or business to which they propose to devote themselves. Having run over the preliminary steps of instruction in this business, probably in a manner no less hurried and superficial than their academic studies, they instantly commence its practical pursuit ; and are perhaps, during the remainder of life, consigned to a daily toil for support, which precludes them from reading, and especially from gaining much knowledge out of their particular profession. Such is the career of ninety nine out of a hundred of those in America who belong to the learned professions. When the alternative either lies, or is supposed to lie between erudition and poverty, or com- fortable affluence and moderate learning, it is not difficult to conjecture which side will be chosen; nor is it surprising, that, in such a state of things, there should be less profound erudition, less ele- gant accomplishment in literature, than where a considerabfle number enjoy all the advantages of exemption from laborious duties, and all the ac- commodations of opulent leisure. Sect. III.] United Stutes of America. 281 To this circumstance may be ascribed the su- perficial and unpolished character of many of their native publications. All that their authors, in many cases, want, to render them more replete with instruction, more attractive in manner, and of course more worthy of public approbation, is leisure. But, able only to redeem a few hasty hours for literary pursuits, from the employments which give them bread, they must necessarily, if they i^ublish at all, send forth productions, from time to time, bearing all the marks of haste and immature reflection. 3. Want of encouragement to learning. Men cannot be expected to labour without the hope of some adequate reward. Genius must be nou- rished by patronage, as well as strengthened by culture. AVhere substantial emoluments may be derived from literary exertion, there, and there alone, will it be frequently undertaken to any considerable extent. Hence, in those countries where genius and learning are best rewarded, there they are ever found to be most cultivated. In the United States, the rewards of literature are small and uncertain. The people cannot af- ford to remunerate eminent talents or great ac- quirements. Booksellers, the great patrons of learning in modern times, are in America too poor to foster and reward the efforts of genius. There are no rich felloxvships in their universities to excite the ambition of students; no large eccle- siastical benefices to animate the exertions of li- terary divines*. Academic chairs are usually * The author would by no means be understood to e\{;rcss an opinion, tliat such immoderately lucrative places, cither in 2S2 Nations lately become Literary. [Ch. XXVT. connected with such small salaries, that they pre- sent little temptation to the scholar: and, finally, the state offers very inconsiderable motives for the acquisition of knowledge, and the exertion of talents. Its rewards are small, and its favour ca- pricious. Can it be wondered then, that those who have some acquaintance with books, and hold important stations, are more anxious to secure pecuniary advantages, and to place themselves in a situation independent of popular favour, than to make advances in literature, or to do honour to their country by the display of intellectual preeminence ? Besides, the spirit of their people is commercial. It has been said, and perhaps with some justice, that the love of gain peculiarly characterises the inhabitants of the United States. The tendency of this spirit to discourage literature is obvious. In such a state of society, men will not only be apt to bend their whole attention to the acquire- ment of property, and neglect the cultivation of their minds as an affaif of secondary moment ; but letters and science will seldom be found in high estimation ; the amount of wealth will be the principal test of influence ; the learned will ex- perience but little reward either of honour or emolument ; and, of course, superficial education will be the prevailing charadter. church or in state, are, on the whole, useful or desirable. He is persuaded that they are much more productive of mischief than of advantage. But that they often excite literary ambition, and afford, in many instances, convenient and useful leisure to literary characters, will scarcely be questioned by those who have paid any attention to the subject. Sect. III.] United States of America. 283 Nor is it of less importance here to recollect, that the nature of their connexion with Great Britain has operated, and continues to operate, unfavourably to the progress of American litera- ture. Long accustomed to a state of colonial de- pendence on this enlightened and cultivated na- tion, they have also been accustomed to derive from her the supplies for their literary wants. And still connected with her by the ties of language, manners, taste, and commercial intercourse, her literature, science, and arts, may be considered as theirs. Being able, therefore, with so much ease, to reap the fruits of her fields, they have not sufficient inducement to cultivate their own. And even when an excellent production of the Ame- rican soil is offered to the public, it is generally undervalued and neglected. A large portio^n of ^heir citizens seem to entertain the idea, that no* thing worthy of patronage can be produced on their side of the Atlantic. Instead of being prompted to a more liberal encouragement of genius because it is American, their prejudices, on this account, are rather excited against it*. * The writer in the Monthly Magazine, whopc strictures on American literature were before mentioned, i-epresents the inha- bitants of the United States as having strong prejudices in favour of their own productions, and ridicules them for preferring ^\me- rtcan publications to all others. In this, as well as in most of his assertions, he discovers profound ignorance of the subject. The fact is directly the reverse. Americans are too apt to join with ignorant or fastidious foreigners, in undervaluing and de- crying their domestic literature ; and this circumstance is one of the numerous obstacles which have operated to discourage lite- rary exertions on that side of the Atlantic, and to impede theic literary progress. 284 Nations latehj become Literary. [Ch. XXVI. 4. Want of books. In the capital cities of Eu- rope, the votary of Jiterature is surrounded with immense libraries, to which he may easily obtain access 3 and even in many of the smaller towns, books on any subject, and to almost any number, may be easily obtained. It is otherwise in Ame- rica. There the student, in addition to all the other obstacles which lie in his way, has often to spend as much time and thought to obtain a parti- cular book, as the reading it ten times would cost. Its public libraries are few, and, compared witli those of Europe, small. Nor is this defect sup- plied by large private collections; these are also rare. And to render the evil still more grievous, tjie number of literary and enterprising booksel- lers is yet smaller. It is only within two or three years that America has begun to receive, wii^k any kind of regularity or promptitude, the best British works as they issue from the press. Such are some of the causes which have hither- to impeded the progress of American literature. Tlieir influence, however, is gradually declining, and the literary prospects of that country are brightening every day. Letters and science are growing more important in the public estima- tion. The number of learned men is becoming rapidly greater. The plans and means of instruc- tion in their' seminaries of learning, though by no means improving ill all respects, arc, in some, receiving constant melioration. The emulation of founding and sustaining a national character in science and learning begins to be more gene- rally felt, and, from time to time, will doubtless be augmented. A larger proportion of the grow- Sect. III.] United States of America. QS5 ine wealth of their country will hereafter be de- voted to the improvements of knowledge, and especially to the furtherance of all the means by which scientific discoveries arc brought within popular reach, and rendered subservient to prac- tical utility. American publications are every day growing more numerous, and rising in re- spectability of character. Public and private li- braries are becoming more numerous and exten- sive. The taste in composition among their writers is making very sensible progress in cor- rectness and refmem.ent. American authors of merit meet with more liberal encouragement ; and when the time shall arrive that they can give to their votaries of literature the same leisure and the same stimulants to exertion with which they are favoured in Europe, it may be confi- dently predicted, that letters will flourish as much in America as in any part of the world ; and that they will be able to make some return to their transatlantic brethren, for the rich stores of use- ful knowledge which they have been pouring upon them for nearly two centuries. Q86 RECAPITULATION. VV E have now made a hasty tour through one of the departments of the subject which we un- dertook to examine. From the foregoing survey, which, however tedious it may have appeared to the reader, is in reality a very rapid one, the eighteenth century appears to bear a singularly distinct and interesting character. In almost every department of knowledge we fmd monuments of enterprise, discover}', and improvement ; and, in some, these monuments are so numerous, valuable, and splendid, as to stand without parallel in the history of the human mind. There have been periods in which particular studies were more cultivated; but it may be asserted, with confi- dence, that in no period of the same extent, since the creation, has a mass of improvement so large, diversified, and rich, been presented to view. In no period have the various branches of science, arts, and letters, received, at the same time, such liberal accessions of light and refinement, and been made so remarkably to illustrate and enlarge each other. Never did the inquirer stand at the confluence of so many streams of knowledge as at the close of the eighteenth century. But, in order to bring more immediately and distinctly into view the leading characteristics of the last age as deducible from the statements which have been given, an attempt will be made to sum them up in the few following particulars: Recapitulation. 287 1. The last century was preeminently an AGE OF FREE INQUIRY. No period in the history of man is so well entitled to this character. Two centuries have not rolled away, since the belief that the earth is globular in its form was punished as a damnable heresy j since men were afraid to avow the plainest and most fundamental principles of philosophy, government, and religion; and since the spirit of liberal inquiry was almost un- known. In the seventeeth century this spirit began to show itself; but it was reserved for the eighteenth to witness an indulgence and exten- sion of it truly wonderful. Never, probably, was the human mind, all things considered, so much unshackled in its inquiries. Men have learned, in a greater degree than ever before, to make light of precedent, and to throw ofl* the authority of distinguished names. They have learned, with a readiness altogether new, to dis* card old opinions, to overturn systems which werv^ supposed to rest on everlasting foundations, and to push their inquiries to the utnjost extent, awed by no sanctions, restrained by no prescrip- tions. This revolution- in the human mind has been attended with many advantages and with many evils. It has led to the development of much truth, and has contributed greatly to enlai'ge the bounds of literatui'C, science, and general im- provement. It has opened the way to a free communication of all discoveries, real or sup- posed, and removed various obstacles which long retarded the progress of knowledge. But thig spirit of inquiry, like every thing else in the 288 Recapitulation. hands of man, has been perverted and abused. It has been carried to the extreme of licentious- ness. In too many instances the love of iiovelty, and the impatience of all restraint founded on prescription or antiquity, have triumphed over truth and wisdom j and, in the midst of zeal for demolishing old errours, the most sacred princi- ples of virtue and happiness have been rejected or forgotten. 2. The last century may be emphatically called the AGE OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE. It was not till the seventeenth century that the physical sciences began to assume a conspicuous place among the. objects of study. Before that period, the learned languages, ancient history, and the metaphysical jargon of the schoolmen, had chiefly engrossed the attention of literary and scientific men. From the time of Bacon and Kepler a taste for natural philosophy began to extend itself This taste was cherished and improved by the scientific as- sociations which began to be formed in different parts of Europe about the middle of the seven- teenth century : but in the eighteenth it became far more predominant than at any former period,, and may be said to form a prominent feature of the age. It has been seen, that several branches of Me- chanical Philcsophy, wholly new, were introduced into the popular systems in the course of this pe- riod ; and that in almost all the branches formerly studied, there were made immense discoveries and improvements. Chemistry has been so much improved and extended, both in its principles and application, that it may be pronounced a Recapitulation. 289 new science. In Natural History^ the progress of philosophers, within the last hundred years, has been no less signal and honourable. The amount of what has been aceomplished in various plans of classification, in the corrections of no- menclature, and in additions to the former lists of specimens in natural history, more particularly in zoology, botany, mineralogy, is too great to be t ; and the author who wished to sub- mit his compositions to the public was under the necessity of reciting them at some favourable meeting of the people *. The disadvantages at- tending this state of things were many and great. It repressed and discouraged talents, and rendered the number of readers extremely small. The in- vention of printing gave a new aspect to litera^ * See Additional Notes (P). Recapitulation. 9,^5 lure, and formed one of the mo^t imi^ortant a3i;as ill the history of human afra,ii^s. It not only in- creased the number and reduced the price of Looks, but it also furnished authors M'ith the means of laying the fruits of their labours before the public, in the most prompt and extensive manner. Considering this art, moreover, as a ^reat moral and political engine, by which an impression may be made on a large portion of a community at the same time, it assumes a degree of importaiice highly interesting to the philaii- thropist, as well as to the scholar *. The extension of this art in the eighteenth cen- jtury forms one of the leading features of the age. Jn the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, e^pe- pially in tlie former, printing presses were iew, and of course publication was by no means easy. The century nnder review exhibited an immense extension of the art. This extension was not only general, but so great, that the most mode- rate estimate presents a result truly stupendous. There was probably a thousand fold more print- ing executed in the course of this^ century, than ^n the whole period that had before elapsed since .the invention of the art ■\. The influence of this ■^■.See Additional Notes (^t). t Tliis will appear a moderate calculation, when it is consi- dered that there is a prodigious increase, not only in the number of new works annually issued from the press, but also in the ex- tent aad number of ed^Vzo^w constautlyilemanded by tl\e piiblir. And M hen to this is added the amount of printing which h:is ,heen continually going foruard, particularly within the lastiiily years, in furnishing the whole literary woild with such a nunj- ber ajid variety of periodical publicaiion.s, as Reviews, Maja- 296 Recapitulation. fact, in increasing the sum of public intelligence, arid in keeping the minds of men awake and ac- tive, fcannot but be noticed by the most superii- cial dbserver of the character of the period under consideration. Printing presses have not onl}'- become numerous in the populous cities, in every literary portion of the world ; but also in remote parts of the country these engines for the diftu- sion of information are found : thus furnishing the good with the means of sowing the seeds of truth and virtue, and the wicked with the means of scattering poison to an extent never before wit- nessed in human society. 7. The last century is entitled to distinction above all others, as the age OF BOOKS ; an age in which the spirit of ruriti?ig, as well as of publi- cation, exceeded all former precedent. Though this is closely connected with the foregoing par- ticular, it deserves a more distinct and pointed notice. Never assuredly did the world abound with such a profusion of various works, or pro- duce such an immense harvest of literary fruits. The publication of books in all former periods of the history of learning laboured under many difficulties. Readers were comparatively few * ; zincs. Newspapers, &c., the estimate above stated will probably be thought rather to fall below than to exceed the truth. * " To prove the paucity of readers," in the seventeenth cen- tury, " it may be sufficient to remark, that the British nation had been satisfied from 1623 to 1664, that is, a period of forty- one years, with only txvo editions of the works of Shakspeare, which probably did not together make one thousand copies." Life of Miltoti, 1)1/ Johnson. Whereas, in the eighteenth century, from 1733 to 1778, that Recctpitutation. 297 of course writers met with small encouragement of a pecuniary kind to labour for the instruction of the public *. Hence, none in preceding cen- turies became authors, but such as were prompted by bencTolence, by literary ambition, or by an enthusiastic love of literature. But the eigh- teenth centtiry exhibited the business of publi- cJltion under an aspect entirely new. It pre- sented an increase in the number, both of writers and readers, almost incredible. In this century, for the first time, authorship became a trade. Multitudes of writers toiled, not for the promo- is, in forty-five years, ten large and splendid editions of the same author were given to the public, and, probably, at least ten more, lOf a less magnificent kind>- in various parts of the British do- minions. Allowing each of these editions to have consisted of two thousand copies, which, on an average, may be supposed a moderate allowance, the number of copies of one publication called for by the English literary public, fn a given period of ths eighteenth century, will be iound forlj/ times greater than the num- bef called for during a period nearly equal in the seventeenth. " Ths advantage now enjoyed b};^ authors, of deriving large profits from the sale of copy-rights, is wholly modern. Mr. Ba- tetti, a frjend of Dr. Johnson, who resided for some time in En- gland, about half a century ago, told the doctor, that he wrts the first man in Italy who receixed money for the copy-right of A book. BosweU's Life of Johnson, vol. ii, p. 503. Though this practice had been established long before in Great Britain, yet evert there the instances of literary profit were rare, and the amount in general extremely small, until the middle, and to- ward the close of the eighteenth century. Milton sold his Parct- di&e Lost for Jlve pounds, on condition of receiving some small Subsfitluettt emolument, if the sale should prove ready and exten- sive. Forty six years afterward, Mr. Pope received tivo hundred pounds for each volume of his translation of the Iliad, or twelve hundred pounds for the whole Work. And towards the close of the tentury, the fevs^ards of literary labour were, in many in-- stances, augmented four, six, and oven ten fold. 298 ■ Recapitulation. tion of science, nor even with a leading view to^dvaace th^ir own repiAation, but for the mar- ket. Swarms of book-makers by profession arose, who inquired, not whether the subjects which theyiundertook to discuss stood in need of further invcistigation ; or whether, they were able to do them more ample justice than their predecessors; but whether more books might not.be palmed up- on the public, and made a source of emolument to the authors. Hence, there were probably more books published in the eighteenth century, than in the whole time that had before elapsed since the art of printing was discovered ; perhaps more than were ever presented to the public, either in manuscript, or from the press, since the creation. This unprecedented and wonderful multiplica- tion of books, while it has rendered the means of information more easy of access, and more popu- lar, has also served to perplex the mind of the student, to divide his attention, and to distract his powers. Where there are so many books, there will be less deep, original, and patient .thinking; and each work will be studied with Jess attention and care. It may further be ob- served, that the abridgements*, compilations, epi- * Never v\as there an age in which the abridgement of volu- juinous works was carried to so great and mischievous a length a? in .the eighteenth century. This mode of treating a prolix WTiter may, in some cases, be justified ; but, in general, it de- serves to be reprobated as a practice both presumptuous and un- fair. Dr. Johnson often spoke of this practice in terms of warrai and just indignation. Once, in particular, hearing a friend ob- serve, tliat " abridging a good book was like presenting a cow .with jbier head and tail cut off," he replied, with equal wit anooks, either for amusement or instruction ; and many respectable habitations scarcely contained a volume excepting the Bible, and one or two devotional books of standard value. In fact, as books of science then rarely appeared, so " those which did appear, containing the accumulateil stores of profound research, and extensive read- ing, were neither accessible nor intelligible, but by a few who had leisure, much previous infor- mation, and perseverance." It is true, as will be presently acknowledged, that such as, at that time, professed to devote themselves to study, were, in general, at least equally, if not more learned, than those who profess to belong to the same class at the present day. But the number of those at the end of the eighteenth century, who were in the habit of reading a few books, and who possessed a moderate and respectable share of information, was certainly far greater than in former periods of the history of man. ■.,.. -" Some modern zealots, indeed, have gone be- '^Ond all just bounds, in describing the illumina- uon and refniement of this period. We are not ^Q ijiuch .wiser than our forefathers, as the sa.n- guiue and ignorant would sometimes represent S04 Recapitulation. us. But there is surely no extravagance in say- ing, that there never was an age in which know- ledge of various kinds was so popular and so ge- nerally diffused, or in which so many publications were circulated and read. The elements of li- terature and science have descended from the higher classes of society, and from universities, to the middle, and in some instances to the lower orders of men. Speculations which were once, in a great measure, conhned to the closets of the curious, have gradually miD2;led themselves with the most prevailing and familiar doctrines of the day. Many modern females arc well informed, and a few extensively learned. The common people read and inquire to a degree that would pnce have been thought incredible. Seminaries of learning are multiplied beyond all precedent. The numbfcr of students which they contain is, in general, much greater than formerly. Modern books, even those on subjects of science, are now divested of their former envelopment of dead languages, and presented in a plain and popular dress. Booksellers, more rich, active, and enter- prising, than they were a century ago, now find it tlieir interest to scatter books in every direction, and to convey some knowledge of them to every door. Libraries have become far more numerous, and are placed on a more popular footing than formerly. Circulating libraries* have been in- * Circulati7ig Libraries, it is believed, were first instituted in. the eighteenth century. The first establishment of this kind in Lon- (Jon was commenced by one Wright, a bookseller, about the year 1740. In 1800 the number of these libraries in Gr-eat Bri- tain was not less than one thousand. Rec.apitulaiion\ 305 troduced during this period, and have contributed greatly to extend the taste and the means of read* -ing; and, finally, periodical publications, and a variety of other small works, which might be pro- cured at a trifling expense, and understood by moderate capacities, or with little previous infor- mation, broke down the large masses of science and learning, presented their component materials in small and convenient portions, and thus fitted them to be received by every mind. 9. But, notwithstanding the wonderful multi- plication of books, the last century may with pro- priety be styled THE AGE OF SUPERFICIAL LEARN- ING. Emiditioiiy strictly so called, has been evi- dently on the decline, from the commencement of this period to its termination. The number of readers, indeed, and of those who assume to them- gelves the title of literary men, was doubtless far greater at the close of the century than ever be- fore, since reading was known : but the number of the truly and profoundly learned was perhaps never so small, in proportion to the whole number who rank with men of letters and science. This is probably owing, in a great measure, to the fol- lowing circumstances. The artificial, luxurious, and dissolute character of the age was not favourable to laborious and patient study. Few can be expected to devote themselves habitually to that kind of reading which requires deep reflexion, and long-conti- nued attention, amid the solicitations of com- pany and pleasure, and the thousand dissipating attractions which an age of refinement and of greatly extended intercourse presents. Vol. in. X 30& ^ Recapitulation. Another circumstance, which has contributed to characterise the eighteenth century as an age of superficial learning, is the unprecedented circula- tion of Magazines, literary Journals, Abridge- ments, Epitomes, &c., with which the republic of letters has been deluged, particularly within the last forty years. These have distracted the attention of the student, have seduced him fro-m sources of more systematic and comprehensive instruction, and have puffed up multitudes with false ideas of their own acquirements. The mass of new, hastily composed, and superficial works, has engrossed the minds of b}'^ far the greater number of readers, crowded out of view the stores of ancient learning, and even many of the best works of the preceding century, and taught too many to be satisfied with the meagreness of modern comp'ends and compi- lations. It may be safely pronounced, that the eighteenth century, not only with regard to the treasures of classic literature, but also with respect to a knowledge of the best writers of all the pre- ceding seventeen centuries, was retrograde rather than progressive throughout the whole of it& course. An additional cause, unfavourable to deep and, sound erudttion, is the nature of those employ- ments which in modern times solicit the atten- tion of mankind. In every age, a great majority of men are destined to a laborious and active life. But in the eighteenth century, the wonderful ex- tension of the commercial spirit, the unprecedented multiplication of the objects and means of mer- cantile speculation, and the numerous tempta- tions to a life of action rather than of study, hare Recapitulation. 307 brought more into vogue than formerly that light, superfieial, and miscellaneous reading, which fits men for the counting house, and the scene of enterprise and emolument, rather than •the recondite investigations of the closet. There is also another cause which prevents in- dividuals from acquiring the same depth of learn- ing which was formerly attained. " The circle of human intelligence, within a hundred years, has been greatly extended : the objects of curious speculation, and of useful pursuit, have multi- plied : many new branches of abstract science have been invented : many theories in physical philosophy have been established : the mechani- cal arts have received great enlargement and im- provement : criticism has had its principles ren- dered more evident, and its application more ex- act: the analysis of the human mind is now ge- nerally an object of inquiry; and modern authors, in voluminous metaphysical treatises, in histories, in poems, and in novels, unfold the seminal prin- ciples of virtue and vice, and sound the depths of the heart for the motives of human action. Of these objects of mental occupation every man, who is elevated above the lower orders of sooiet} , is obliged to know something, eitlier by the lo\'e of novelty, or by the shame of ignorance. But if the objects of inquiry be numerous, each can- hot be investigated profoundly; the powers of the hiiman mind are finite, and the union of ac- curacy and universality of knowledge is a chimera. In this case, therefore, the search will not be for complete and systematic treatises, which examine ♦I subject on all sides, and in its minutest parts, X2 308 Recapiiidation. detect it in its most obscure beginnings, and trace its influence in the remotest consequences;, but for books of less tremendous bulk, which exhibit the subject in its most material points, preserving general outlines^ and principal fea- tures *." To the causes above mentioned may be added one other, derived from the more frequent inter- course of men in advanced civilisation. " In this intercourse, a taste for learned and ingenious con- versation has arisen, and the natural desire of su- periority impels men to excel in it. But in col- lecting means for acquiring this excellence, the specious rather than the useful are sought. Facts are stored, not for the exercise of rational criti- cism, nor for the deduction of important truth, but that they may be again distributed f ." Hence the temptation to study many subjects superfici- ally, but to gain the complete mastery of none. Hence those scraps and shreds of knowledge which are daily served up in periodical publications, and scattered through all ranks of society, ex- cepting the very lowest, in popular manuals, form a large part of that learning which is daily sported in the social circle, and in the conflicts of dispu- tation. 10. From the details which have been givennn the foregoing chapters, it appears that the last century may, with peculiar propriety, be styled THE AGE OF TASTE AND REFINEMENT. In the productions of bold and original genius, though * Monthly Reviezv, vol. xxix, p. 302, N. S. t Ibid. Be capitulation. 309 greatly fruitful, it has perhaps been exceeded by some former ages*^ but in the general prevalence of taste and refinement, it may be confidently asserted that no age ever equalled the last. This remark might be illustrated at great length, by recurring to the state of the various branches of human knowledge and art during the period in question. In the Physical Sciences it might be shown, that, though great and splendid discoveries have l^een made in this period, much more has been done in pursuing former discoveries, in extending the limits of principles before established, in forming systems of classification, arrangement, and nomen- clature, and in conferring beauty and elegance on every part. In the Mechanic Arts, also, inventions have been made highly honourable to the genius of the age; but the improvements in simplicity, convenience, accuracy, and exquisite nicety of workmanship, are far more numerous and more strikingly characteristic of the age f. But, per- haps, to Polite Literature this general remark may be applied with still more confidence, and to a greater extent. The poets and historians of the eighteenth century have the advantage of all their * " Much has been ZLritten ia this age," says Voltaire, " but genius belonged to the last." f It cannot be denied, that some articles of ancient manufac- ture which have come down to our times discover an exquisite polish and elegance of workmanship, which we seldom find ex- ceeded, perhaps not equalled, at the present day. But that the mechanic arts, //i general, reached a degree of improvem,ent in the eighteenth century which they could never before boast, particularly in simplicity, convenieace, and beauty, it is pre- sumed none will hesitate to admit. 310 Recapitulation, predecessors in no respect so decidec^ly as in uni- form correctness, polish, and taste. In a word, the Master Builders in the temple of knowledge, during this period, have been perhaps fewer in number than in several preceding centuries ; but neither the number nor the success of those who busied themselves in extending, polishing, and adorning the fabric, was ever so great. This feature of the last age remarkably appears in the state of what may be called the mechanical part of literature. The refined, elegant, and ex- pensive manner in which books have been for some time printed and decorated, more especially within the last ten or fifteen years of the century, as it marks a period of luxury and taste, so we may question whether it has not been carried to an injurious length. If this system of sacrificing the useful to the ornamental be pursued much further, it must contract the circulation of books, and of course diminish the number both of au- thors and of readers. Some have even pronounced, that it must operate to produce a " counterrevo- lution in the republic of letters, and introduce all the misfortunes of a manuscript age." 11. The century under consideration maybe denominated THE AGE OF INFIDEL philosophy. There have been in every age " profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called." But it may be confidently pronounced, that there never was an age in which so many Ae- liberate and systematic attacks were made on Re- vealed Religion, through the medium of pretend- ed science, as in the last. A few truly learned and ingenious men made such attacks the main Recapitulation. S\\ 'business of their lives; and many others, of humbler note, who vainly aspired to the name oi philosophers, have directed their puny efforts toward the same object. Tile doctrine of Materialism probably had a greater currency among certain classes of the learned, during this period, than in any former age enlightened by Christian knowledge. It was, indeed, pushed to an atheistical length by some who assumed the name and gloried in the character of philosophers. Astronomical records have been fabricated or misinterpreted for the purpose of discrediting the sacred chronology. The natural history of the Earth, of Man, and of other animals, has been pursued with unwearied diligence, to find evidence which should militate against the inform.ation conveyed in the Scrip- tures. The discoveries in Chemistry have been tortured to furnish a physical solution of all those phenomena of motion, life, and mind, which are unanimously c-onsidered, by more sober inquirers, as teaching the immateriality of the soul, and as proclaiming the existence of a supreme intelli- gent First Cause. Systems of Moral and Poli- tical philosophy have been formed, by which their authors meant to strike at the root of evangelic truth. And all the stores of ancient and modern literature have been ransacked to obtain some pretext for disbelieving the precious Records which God condescended to bestow on our fallen race. This rage for impious theory, though it had 1-ong before existed, began more boldly and ex- , 312 Recapitulation. tensively to proclaim its views about twenty years' before the close of the period under considera- tion. Tliere is scarcely a single branch of human knowledge to which this scientific and literary perversion has not reached ; and scarcely a ridi- culous or odious form of errour to which it has not given rise. Were these motley and grotesque figures, formed by perverted genius, only intend- ed to traverse the stage, for the temporary pur- pose of amusement, they might excite less of our attention ; but, considering them, as their framers have anxiously desired to make them be consi- dered, as guides to knowledge, and as rules of action, every lover of human happiness will re- gard them with more serious and indignant feel- ings. And although their influence has been counteracted by means which will be presently mentioned, they have yet poisoned the principles and completed the ruin of millions. Almost every successive age has some peculia- rity in the style and manner of its philosophers and writers ; some particular livery, which serves to distinguish it from other times. The scientific livery of the last age is, as we have seen, a fan- tastic patch-work, enriched with many beautiful and precious materials, but deformed by the mix- ture of many gaudy colours and false ornaments. Among the latter we may reckon that continual prating about the " energies and progress of Mind,** the " triumph of Reason," the " omnipo- tence of Philosophy," the " perfectibility of M^n," &c., which was never before so loud and frequent; which has been employed, with particular volu- Recapitulation. 313 bility and success, by infidel philosophers; and which, amid continual and abundant refutations, is yet clamorous and obtrusive. 12. The period under review may be pro- nounced THE AGE OF CHRISTIAN SCIENCE. This is by no means inconsistent with the statement in the last particular ; for, after all the attacks of infidelity, and of theoretical philosophy, the Re- ligion of Christ, wlien contemplated through the medium of science, has had a complete and un- precedented triumph during this period. It has been often objected to Christianity, that it is un- favourable to the progress of knowledge ; that it discourages scientific enterprise j that it is inimi- cal to free inquiry, and has a tendency to keep the minds of men in blindness and thraldom. The history of the last concurs with that of many pre- ceding centuries, in demonstrating that the very reverse of what the objection states is the truth. C/i7'istia?i natio?is, during the period in question, have been, of all others, most remarkable for fa- vouring the advancement of liberal knowledge. In those countries in which religion has existed in its greatest pz^riVj/, and has enjoyed the most general prevalence, literature and science have been most extensively and successfully cultivated. It is also worthy of remark> that, among all the professions denominated learned, the clerical pro- fession!! may be considered as having furnished as many, if not more, authors of distinction than any other. And if we join to tJie clergy those lay- authors w\xo have been no less eminent as Chris- tians than cw scholars, the predominance of learn- Sli Recapitulation. ing and talents on the side of Religion will ap- pear too great to admit of comparison. But this is not all : — as the last centXiry is re- markable for having furnished an unprecedented number of attacks on Revealed Religion, through the medium of science ; so it is also no less re- markable for having derived much support to Revelation, and much valuable illustration of the Sacred Writings, from the inquiries of philosophers and the observations of travellers. Many of the discoveries made in mechanical and chemical philosophy, during this period, have served to elu- cidate and confirm various parts of the Christian Scriptures. Every sober and well directed in- quiry into the natural history of man, and of the globe we inhabit, has been found to corroborate the Mosaic account of the creation, the fall, the deluge, the dispersion, and other important events recorded in the sacred volume. To which we may add, that the reports of voyagers and travel- lers, within this period, have no less remarkably served to illustrate the sacred records, and to con- firm the faith of Christians. Never was there a period of the same extent in which so much light and evidence in favour of revelation were drawn from the inquiries of philosophy as in that which is under review : nor was it ever rendered so ap- parent, that the information and the doctrines contained in the sacred volume perfectly harmo- nise with the most authentic discoveries, and the. soundest principles of science. 13. The last century may be emphatically called THE AGE OF TRANSLATION.—^'* Of almost Recapitulation. 315 every other kind of writing tlie ancients have left us models which all succeeding ages have labour- ed to imitate; but transkition may justly be claimed by the moderns as their own." — The Greeks, so far as we know, achieved nothing worthy of notice in this department of literary labour. The Romans, who confessed themselves the scholars of the Greeks, made a few versions of those writings which they followed as mo- dels * ; but it does not appear that any of their writers grew eminent by transkition; and, indeed, it was probably more frequent to ti'anslate for private exercise or amusement than for fame. For three centuries past the art of translation has been gradually gaining ground throughout the literary world, both in frequency and ele- gance f . But the extension of this art, in both '■'' Every man in Rome who aspired to the praise of literature thought it necessary to learn Greek; and therefore stood in little need of translations. Translation, however, was not wholly neglected. Dramatic poems could be understood by the people in no languace but their own : and the Romans were sometimes' entertained with the tragedies of Euripides, and the comedies of Menander. Other works were sometimes atteaipted : in an old scholiast there is mention of a Latin Iliad, and we have not wholly lost Cicero's version of the poem of Aratus. — Idler, ii. No. 68J- -Kiiinpm 5^1^ 'i^ ' f Chaucer, the father of English poetry, was^'aHiong thtf first translators into our language. He left a version of .Boethius On the Cqniforts qf Philosophy, which, though dull, prosaic, and in- elegant, held, at that early period, a conspicuous place. Some improvement in the art of translation was made in the reign of queen Elizabeth ; but still any thing like freedom and ekgance was seldom asttftined. It waa not till towards the close of the seventeetith "qentury that^- The funds of this college are small, consisting of money on intierest, amounting to about 3500 dollars, and a township of fjapd in the province of Maine, worth, perhaps, from 7000 to 10000 dollars. The income, from tuition, room-rent, &.C., is , about 2000 dollars annually. The institution has been hitherto supported by colonel Williams's donation, by sub- .jscriptions among the inhabitants of Williamstown and its. vi- cinity, by the product of a lottery, and by a grant of two townships of land in the province of Maine by the legislature The officers of this college are, a president (who is at pre- gent the r«v. Dr. Ebenezer Fitch) and four tutors. The in- stitution is governed by sixteen gentlemen, of whom the pre- sident for the time being is one, and always presides at their ineetings. .,+• TJie number of students at the close of the year 1800>>^:^ .93. - They are boarded in the college, and in private houses in, the vicinity. The price of board, tuition, washing,,, )i'Qo4» J&c, amounts annually to about 100 dollars. ^,jof;.<- The library consists of about 600 volumes. Two literary societies belonging to the college have a library in common, .consisting of 300 volmnes xiiore. The philosophical appara- tus is small ; but well selected and good, so far as it goes. A good telescope and some other articles are mucjijv^pted ta render the collection tolerably complete. - ^, |t Y Tfhe, course of instruction is nearly similar to that which >vas detailed .as taking place in Harvard College, The prin- cipal points.of diiierence are the following: — ^There .appears, to t»e rather less attention paid to classic literature hQrethajn at Harvard. ,PfiesAey's Lectures on History are studied, by the juaier cjassj instead ol MiUoJL'a. J[^Qmentsj..Ed>>ar45,.Qii^-Ui$ Additional Notes. 339 ' Will, by the senior class, in addition to Locke; and in some * instances the senior class has recited Dr. Hopkins's System of ^^Theology ; in others Doddridge's Lectures. r.oiiibnv -' The annual commencement is on the first Wednesday of September J and at the close of the year 1800 about 80stu- dcnts had received the honours of the college. ^ iii Boi'jdoin college. This college was instituted in 1794-. 'It' is situate at Brunswick, in the province of Maine; and was so called in honour of the late governor Bowdoin. ' This institution is yet in its infancy. There are a presi- dent (who is the rev. Joseph M'Kean), lately appointed, and a professor of languages. With respect to the state of the funds, the number of the students, the course of instruction, &c., no information has been obtained. But as the college has not been organised njore than three or four years, its con- stitution cannot yet be very complete or mature. "^■In New Hampshire there is one college, viz. Dartmouth college, which was incorporated in 1769. This seminary is situate in Hanover, in the county of Grafton, and derives its name from the earl of Dartmouth, one of its principal benefactors. The rev. Dr. Eleazar Wheelock was the founder, and the first president. (See p. 2il.) The first college buildings were erected in 1770, and a large addition made to them in 1786. The government of the college is in the hands of twelve trustees, seven of whom make a quorum. By them all laws and appointments are made, and to them the officers are re- sponsible. ' ' ■ "^ ' The officers are, a president (who is at present jTohh Wh^^ lock, LL. D., the son of the first president) ; a professor of ttiathematics and natural philosophy ; a professor of the Latiji and Greek languages; a professor of chemistry and medi- cine ; and two tutors. The course of instruction. Students must be qualified for Amission by a knowledge of the Greek Testament, of Virgi^ Z2 jj: WSb AMitidnat "T^otes. •an(5 Cicero's Orations, and of the principles of arithmetic; and when admitted, usually continue four years before they receive decrees. The freshman class attend to the Greek and 'taifn aut'hbrs, the principles of composition, criticism, rhe- 'fenc, &r. The sophomore class to geography, logic, and f^'e mathematics. The junior class to natural philosophy, 'ff«>ral 'philoso'phy, and the higher branches of the mathematics :^ the 'sophomores and jimiors both continuing to devote a pottioh of their time to the classics. The senior class attend to meta- "^hysics, the principles of civil lavi-, divinity, chertii^fy', and itatural history. -'• ''''^? ^ The funds of this college consist chiefly of lands g^Mitcd ^ft^'NeW Hampshire and Vermont, most of which' are istltl'iiA- productive. Of these lands there are about 4-000() acres; ^' ■ The college library consists of about 3000 volumes. Thd philosophical apparatus is sufficient for a common course of experimental philosophy. - The number of students in 1801 was 140. The greater " 'part of these are accommodated in the college. The anntiaf expense of each individual, including boarding, tuition, &c.< «xcept clothing and other contingencies, is about 100 tjbl- %2^y-- ■■■ .>?iTto?wlT V, *- 'in 1801 eight hundred stiidtfnts had graduated at this"Coll6^6 'srftce its establishment. !"<'."/'. '^ Tn Rhode Island there is one college, viz. '''"'"* ^"* ' 'Rhode Lshoid college. The charter for this sfeilitnait^^^'^V'ks obtained in 1761-. The rev. James Manning, of New Jersey, 'had the principal agency in founding it, and was chostehthe first president.- The college edifice was erected i^i 1770. ~ Ik is a spacious building, 150 feet long, 46 feet wide, and four istdries high, and contains 56 apartments. .:'Ho'-> diii *' The government of the college is vested iii a' b62?r*d "of 'trilstees. The immediate officers are, a president, proftessdr of -'ihathematics and natural philosophy, professor'df 'law', *ahd three tutors. .:.)Hif^. a^u oj,.o//ou,^' . AMitional Notes. -341 ■The^ funds of this institution are small, amounting to little jjaore than 8000 dollars, chiefly raised by subscription. . , ,. f.^rThe philosophical apparatus is tolerably complete. It h^s lately received considerable accessions by the liberality of JSamuelElam, esq., of New Port. The libr^ry^eontajifts ahpiit _ 3000 volumes. ..;''' r .JiiiTnritf-^ -3,-{tThe number of students in 1801 was 107. They.,^re chiefly boarded in the college; and the necessary aai^jial^^- ^peijise of each is about 100 dollars. , ,« ^' ■'., |)-jeThejri^ ,i^ by no means a general taste for literature in this state. Of the 107 students above mentioned only 12 belonged ^o the state. The greater part of the rest were from Massa- chusetts, and a number from the southward, especially from South Carolina. *-•■'■' r '\,. ,Jft Connecticut there is one college, viz. Yale college, at New Haven. Tliis institution was incor- ..porated in I70I, and was the third college established in the Jun^rican colonies. It received this name in honour of Tho- mas Yale, esq., who had been governor of Fort St. George, in jindia, and who was one of its liberal benefactors. . ^ The oflicers of this college are, a president (now the rey. Dr. Timothy Dwight) ; a professor of divinity j professor of mathematics and natural philosophy; professor of Oriental languages ; and three tutors. The number of students ia this college is believed to be greater than in any other in the United States. In IS'Jl they a^nountcd to 217; and the number since that time has pro- ^>ba^ly increased. The students are chiefly boarded in the college, and the annual expense attending the accommodation - of each is from 120 to 150 dollars. The college buildings ar^ spacious and elegajit. The. li- • ,brary consists of between 3000 and 4000 volumes. The phi- . losopl^ical apparatus is considered an^ong the best in Ame- j, j^ca^,£|The iivnd^ ,are large, but the aniouat of them is not known to the writer. 343 Additioyial Notes. 'The annual commencement* is bh the second AVedncs^ay-' or September ; and the number of students who had graduated^ at this college, at the end of the year 1800, was about 26OO. The state of Vermont has one college, viz. ' " •^^JP o '' 'Middlebury college, situate in the town of Middleljilry/ 113 A^disori county. This seminary was founded in iiSOd/ tind'"* is yet in an inl'ant state. '' -i" '=''f '^i The government of this college is vested 'jVi a^ ob^Sf ^ trustees, consisting of sixteen gentlemen. The bflficcrs'^Sr 1^1 were, a president (the rev. Mr. J. Atwater) ; and a tutor. " One or more piK)fsssors have probably been elected since. ' The funds consist chiefly of lands, Avhich, though little productive at present, promise hereafter to afford an aiftlple support to the institution. "" ' The number of students in the college, and grammar-schbiol' annexed to it, was, in 1801, about 30. Since that time ft 1^ believed they have increased. They are all boarded in pfli3 vate houses. The annual expense of each, including board- ing, washing, tuition, &c., is from 80 to 90 dollars. '^^ ""^ The library is small, but increasing. The philosopfiical ' apparatus is incomplete ; but measures have been adopted to render it less so ; and, on the whole, the institution has a' prospect of becoming, at no great distance of time, ekteit- sively useful. i .<' i ' Kev.' York has two colleges, viz- ' '^^ 1. Co^Mwim co//t;g^f, in the city of New York. This ftl^i-"' tution was founded in 1754, under the title oi King's colte^', which name, after the revolution, was exchanged for theione which it now bears. (See p. 218 of this volume.) ':' '' This college is under the direction of a board of trustfee's; The immediate officers are, a president (at present the i^eV.'' Dr. Benjamin Moore, bishop of the protestant episcopal church in the state of New York) ; a professor of moral pM-'- losbpliy, ibrf^ie, ftietbrie, and belles lettres; a professor b-f tfefe' ~ Addiimial Noles^^ S4S ■ ■ ■•• i^- .i>i'v' Greek, and Latin languages, and of Grecian and Roman anti- quities ; a professor of mathematics, natural phllosopEy, chronology, and geography ; and a professor of chemistry. Beside these, there are in the medical school attached to the college, a dean of faculty ; a professor of anatomy and sur- gery;, a professor of the institutes of medicine; a professor of obstetrics ; and a professor of materia medica and botany, To qualify students for admission into this college, it is ne-_ cessary .that they should be able to read the four Gospels jn Greek, together with four books of Virgil's iEneid, four books of Cassar's Commentaries, and four orations of Cicero against Catiline. . The^course of instruction in this college is as follows : " , The first year, Sallust, Livy, two books of Virgil's Geor- gics, part of the New Testament in Greek, from twenty to" thirty dialogues of Luc i an, and two books (generally) .br Xenophon. To these are added arithmetic, algebra, a small portion of Euclid, and Latin composition, . • The second year, Virgil's Georgics finished, Horace's Odes, and part of his Satires, the Orations of Demosthenes, an ad- ditional portion of Xenophon, and two books of Homer. WitK these are mingled, English grammar, six books of Euclid, modern geography, trigonometry, with its various applica'- tions to surveying, navigation, &c., Latin and English coin- position. The third year, Horace's Epistles, and Art of Poetry, six books of Homer, conic sections, spheric trigonometry, with its application to astrononiical problems, ancient geography, rhetoric, and English composition. , .. . The fourth year, natural philosophy, logic, and moral phi- losophy, Terence, Longinus, chemistry, and English compo^ siti9!^., .J public speaking once a week through the wli^Ie course.;, : ... , --. , -r ' / ■■^jyj.-j : , - i:-nl- jJS!03niin; '•>nT I^,is,;^)(?lieved that there is no other college in the United^ States, ija which the Greek and Latin languages are studied, •with fo much, care, aad, to pch an extent,, as in tjiis. insti-. tvjtion. ■ 944 Additional Sotes. *: This" CdHe'gc has a library, consisting of about 300(5 to- luiniBS. Its philoHOjihical apparatus is among the best in the •United States. The number of matficuiated students is about '125. Besiile these, there are the students in the medical 'school, and Some others, who sustain a less formal connexiou '\vi'th the institution. ,^^Hi c^ 2. Union College, at Schenectady. This college Avias foii'dsd in 179.5, and though its growth has not beeiv very- rapid, it bids fair to be a useful institution. ~m% > The college officers are, a president (now the rev. Dr. Ma.^cey); a professor of mathematics and natural philosophy; and tv.-o tutors. ,b.3;-fQ3jr|nu j The number of students in ISOI was about 43. They \vere at that time boarded in private families; but are timv accommodated in the college edifice, which is spacious and convenient. -.^ The library consists of 800 volumes. The philosophical apparatus is a respectably large and good one. The funds of the institution are small. The state of New Jersey has one college, viz. Nassau Hall, or the college of New Jersey, at Princeton. This college was founded in 1746, at Elizabethtown, from "which place it was removed in 1747 to New Ark, and in 1757 to Princeton, where it has since continued. About this time the large college edifice was erected, 180 feet long j 54- feet Avide, and four stories high ; capable of accommodating a large number of students. (See chapter xxvi, p. 204, of this work.) This building, together with tlie library, much of the philosophical apparatus, &c., was destroyed by fire in the be- ginning of the year 1802. Since that time, however, by the iaid of liberal benefactions from everjf^ part of the United, States,^ ii has-been rebuilt, and the whole iustitutron-pjaced under new advantages and regulations, which promise a de- .^riiC of respectability and usefulness greater thaii- it h^d ever before attained. Additional Notes. 345 • ^ -Tke" governnient of this college is vested in twenty ^u^ -trustee?;, iaclnding the prcsitlent of the cQllege, and thegor vernor of the ' state, for tlje time beiag. The ofiieers of the college are, a president (the rev. Dr. Samuel S.Smith); a professor of languages; a professor of divinity j a ,profe.«sor; of mathematics, natural philosophy, aitd chemistiy; .^iji*i three tutors. !:3n--s ^f . ,T/"a\W.) i^C'SvJ .It' " The library is now small ; bufr wieaSiiH?es have .^en {lateljr taken, which will probably soon reader it one of the laigest and best college libraries in the United J^tates.^ The philo- i^ophical apparatus is a respectable one, and alsotli^el^Jt^t^ improved, ,.-.,a - ,r- .':;.f • The course of instruction i\\ tl^is seminary is not, accurately known to the writer. It is believed, however, that this is one of the institutions in the United States in which classical learning receives more than usual attention ; and7,iiv vvhicb, beside an advantageous mode of pursuing most of the objects of study, polite literature is cultivated with great success*' ; The number of students in this college, at the close of the year 1803, amounted to about 150; a greater number than ever before belonged to the institution. They are chiefly boarded in the college edifice. The annual expense of each. is not certainly known, but is believed to be fro.m, 150 tft.no ..dollars. . ,. ri- .siiii'The annual commencement in this college is oiv>;tlTQ/,last • iW^ednesday of September. ci arii^amit • ■ ' ■ .£. iOh'vff iyi^ In Pennsylvania there are three colleges, viaii-rt sn^tl f 1. The University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelpliia. This institution was formed in 1791, l)y the union of the Cctllege of Philadelphia, founded in 175% (sec page 213) and anotiier institution, formed immediately after the revolutionary war, ■ wider the same title which the xmited seminaries now bear. iv^.The olhcers of this institution are, a provost (this place is ■ "3fiacw -vacant), who is also prpfessor of naturall . philosophy j a r- viccpa^ovost, who is also professor of logic and moral philo- d^ Additional NdteA sophy ; a professor of Greek and Latin, languages.; a professor of mathematics ; a professor of English and belles lettres ; and ^ professor of Oriental literature. Beside these,, the, in- structors in the medical school are, a professor of anatomyj. a professor of the institutes and practice of medicine ; a proK fessor of materia medica, natural history, and botany ; and a professor of chemistry. This medical school is much more- frequented by students than any other in the United,-^?^^,., (See Vol. ii, p. 18, and vol. iii, p. 265.) n'tfi\ h^-^^f The library of this seminary consists of about 1000 vo- lumes. The philosophical apparatus is tolerably good. The whole number of students belonging to the institution, at the close of the year 1803, was about 160; but of these only, a small portion actually belonged to the classes in college. 2. Dickinson college, in Carlisle. This college was founded in the year 1783, and received the name which it bears in honour of John Dickinson, esquire, the celebrated political,, writer, and its most liberal benefactor. (See page 251). „ The government of this college i» in the hands of a boar4-, df trqstees. The officers are, a president (now the rev. Dr. Nisbet) ; vicepresident ; and two professors. The library consists of about 3000 volumes. The philosophical appa- ratus is small. The amount of the funds is not known to the^ ^"^'^^^ ...zoiJ The number of students in this college is believed to^.bfj,, about 45 or 50. They are boarded in private families in the, . tovirn, Sf/ -Franklin college, in Lancaster. This institution was- founded in 1787, for the particular accommodation of the.^. German inhabitants of Pennsylvania, to enable them to edu---^ cate their youth in their own language, and in conformity^* with their own habits. The principal is a German Lutheran^ , and the vicepresident a Caivinist. Its present state is not. known to the writer ; but it is believed not to be in a very flourishing condition. Additional Notes. 3^ -Ih Maryland there are four colleges, viz. * -'r-in 5 < vnac^ 1. St, John's college, at Annapolis. This coHege wsA^ founded in the year 1784; and, together with the seminary which tvill be next mentioned, forms the " university of '. Maryland." ' '< -' This college is governed by twenty four trustees. lit^fCi^- cers are, a president (now John M'Dowell, esq.)? SP'^i^e-'i president; and three pr6fessors. Its funds ar6 chiefly de-' rived from voluntary subscription, and an annual grant of' 1750/. from the state, aided by the incoine from the i^tudehts for tuition. Its library is moderately large ; and its philo^ sophical apparatus only tolerably good. ' '■'■' In 1801 the number of students in this institution was' about 100. -^- 2. Washington college, in Chestertown, instituted in 17^, and, like the preceding, placed under the direction of twenty four visitors or trustees. In 1787 a permanent fund wais granted to this institution, by a law of the state, of 1 250?. a year; which has been since continued. No other particulars concerning this college are known. 3. The Catholic college, at Georgetown, on the Potowmac. This institution is under the particular direction of the Ro- man catholics, who form a considerable part of the popnla^ lion of Maryland. The writer lias not been so happy as to" succeed in his attempts to obtain particular information con- cerning this seminary. ?,TO tP'ieoa.i 4. Cokesbury college, at Abingdon, in Harford counTy." This college was founded by the methodist church in f785, and intended for the education of youth belonging td'tKat - communion. It is so called in honour of the rev. Thomas Coke, and the rev. Francis Asbury, bishops of the methodist episcopal church. No particulars are known to the writer respecting the officers, funds, number of students^ &c. In Virginia there are two colleges, viz. 1. William and Mary College, at Williamsburgh. This in. 'S^S Additional Notes.. stitution Avasincoqiorated in . 1j693, by king William and queen Mary, whose names it bears. Tlae credit of obtaining the charter, and of organising the establishment, is due to the rev.. James Blair (See p. 192). This was the second c^Uegg fonnded in the American colonies. :;i.'oy -♦i; "J^hegoveriving powers in this college are vested in a board of visitors, not exceeding twenty. The officers are, a presi- dent (now the rev. Dr. Madison, bishop of the protestant episr copal church in the state of Virginia), v.- ho is also professori,-^ moral and natural philosophy ; a professor of mathematics ; a professor of ancient languages; a professor of modern laoT guages; a professor of law ; and a professor of chemistry.; , ; ^ In the moral school, in this college, the course consists, of, I. Logic and the philosophy of the human mind. On these sjabjectp, the works of Duncan, Reid, and professor Stewart are studied. 2. lihctoric and belles lettres. Here Dr. Blair^s lecture? are chiefly used. 3. Moral philosophy. In this. de- partment the author studied is Paley. 4. Natural law. Ruther^ forth and Burlamaqui, Sec. 5. Law of nations. Vattel and iMartens. 6. Politics. Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau, &c. 7, Political economy. Smith's Wealth of Nations. In aa^ tural philosophy there is a regular course of lectures, attended with every necessary experiment. In this course, the works generally referred to, and recommended, are those of Rovvnr iDg, Helsham, jMartin, Desaguliers, Muschenbroeck, Cavallo, Adams, Lavoisier, Chaptal, &c. ,. -.rj In the department of law, the professor takes an extensive view of the general principles of government ; comments; on the-great work of judge Blackstone ; explains the structure and principles of the American governments, and particulai'ly of ihe. government of Virginia. In teaching the ancient an4 modern languages, the usual course is pursued. ThoughaU the students ai-e not compelled to attend to the former, yfeli a tjpmp'etent. knowledge of them is necessary in order Id ithe taking. ofa regular degree. •..?:.•.,>,/.- ;^i!lX No particular period of residence at this college is requiredfc Addiiioyinl Noles. S4p AH students who are prepared to go throitgh : the prescribed examination may receive its honours. rr"'^. '.-a "^ ''The'nDiwber of students in' this caHege, in the beginning t)f the year 1801, was 53. The library contains about 300D volumes. The philosophical apparatus, when prDCufed in 1768, was well chosen, and tolerably complete. It cost, at that time, between 2000 and 3000 dollars. Having been in constant use for more than 30 year^, it stands ia need of JPii' pairs, and is less complete than at first-r^J?- ndi ai doirurf-j ir.qoit '' The funds of this college were lYiuch diminished by the revolution. They now amount to about 4500 dollars per cnv- man — derived from the rents of certain lands j a certain jtroportion of surveyor's fees; and the interest :of rtioiiev lent. ■ : - ■ "^ * ' Thfere is probably no college in the United States in \t4if ch "political science is studied with so much ardour, and irt'^viii'Cfll, it is considered so preeminently a favourite object, '"JKf'fli this. ^ V'^.v-vir'T ^i!Q.' Hunipden Sidney college, in Prince Edward county. Thf* 'Seminary was founded about the year 1774, chiefly by the exertions of the rev. Samuel S. Smith, now president of -the college of New Jersey. - it^ lM^uf This college has scarcely any funds. The philosophical apparatus is small. Its library consists of about 500 volumes; Tlie number of students maybe estimated in general at about 60 or 70. A "^Vi?.r, ■>':•.- ■ ... ^;,^. ^,l ; : - 'Nbrth Carolina has one college, viz. a*ii lo wsi* ^■-The University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, Ofang^ tbanty. " This institution was incorporated in 1789; and th6 legislature of the state, by subsequent acts, made large grants for its support. The college buildings were erected in 1794} and tuition, it is believed, was commenced in 1795. " *•" '* ' ' ' The funds of the university of Norlli Carolina 'jWe» hl^*'. They consist of 14777/. in cash, public JlO^artd bohdgi^Mjf ^350 Additional Notes. -all the property in the state which is or shall hereafter be "eseheatedj of 94000 acres of land, indifferent parts of the state ; and of other real property to a considerable amount. No other particulars concerning this institution are known to the writer. .:l:y?^.r?5I ai ^outh Carolina has four colleges, viz. -i{;i; Winnesborough college, at Winnesborough, in Fairfield county. This institution was founded about the year 1795^ It is yet in an infant state ; the funds, number of students, &c., being small. 2. A college in the city of Charleston. This was instituted about the same time with the preceding ; but has not yet attained any great degree of respectability. The trustees have, in a few instances, conferred the degree of bachelor of arts; but have not, it is believed, attempted to bestow literary honours of a higher rank. 3. A college at Cambridge, in the district of Ninety-six. This was incorporated at the same time with the two last men- tioned seminaries ; but it has dwindled into an unimportant • school. 4. A college at Beaufort, also incorporated about the ye'i^ 1795. This institution has yet been scarcely organised j but agreeable anticipations are formed of its respectability arid usefulness. ^"^^ The reason why no college in this state has risen to rtTucH respectability is, that the legislature, instead of directing their aid and patronage to one, which, under these circumstances, inight have flourished, have divided their attentions and grants among several. The cousecjuences have been very unfriend- ly to the progress of literature. '"'^ '^ tc- no ''^ Georgia has one college, viz. The XJniversiti/ of Georgia, founded in 1785. This institil- tion is not yet fully organised. Liberal provision has been A^dilmial Notes: 35 1 rjwade by the state for its support; and when the buildings and other arrangemients shall be completed, it bids fair to be an extensively uaefiil seminary. Moiobi^- •:.;V"v. ; ■ /• /I, , ■ . .^~.-... Kentucky has one college, viz. The Transylvania college, or university, at Lexington. This seminary was founded by the union of two academics in December 1798, and styled by the act of union the Transyl- vania university. ;t,.h^br.iy(yt vBv)' rtot*uitt?.(fr aidT ,Yfnr;07 The government of this institution is vested in a board Of trustees. The officers are, a president (at present the rev. Mr. jMppre), who is also professor of logic, metaphysics, moral philosophy, and belles lettres ; a professor of mathematics, natural philosophy, astronomy, and geography; a professor of the Greek and Latin languages ; a professor of law ; a pro- iessor of medicine and surgery ; and a professor of chemistry. The funds of this university consist chiefly of lands, and may be considered as amounting to 179000 dollars. The li- brary consists of more than 1300 volumes; beside a law li- brary, and a medical library, for the students of law and me- dicine. The philosophical apparatus is respectable, and mea- sures have been taken to render it still more so. The number of students at this seminary, in 1801, was about 70. Of these 19 were students of law, and six of medi- cine. The annual expense of boarding, tuition, &c,, is bom §9j^i^4004QUars. lf-nb ■'■:: ■■■" .j-: ...Tennessee has one college, viz. ^^^,^. ^^^ j^jj. . Greenville college, founded in the year 1794. Tne funds of this institution are very small. It has a library, consisting of 2000 volumes; a good philosophical apparatus, and about 20 students. The officers of the college are, a president (at present- th» re;^jjilezekiah Balch), and one other professor. Note (P)t page 294.— It is v.*ell knWn, that the ancientJ, 352 Additional Notes. being ignorant of the art of printing, were obliged to employ . public rehearsals as the best means of making known new com- positions. In early times this was the case with writers of the first class, llerodotus recited his history, in dirterent portions, at the Olympic games ; and other writers of great reputation did the same. Tacitus speaks in the foUoAvlng language of the author, who is obliged to employ this method of publishing his works. " Ciim toto anno, per omnes dies, magna noctium parte, unum lihrum extudit et clucubravit, rogare ultroetam- bire cogatur, ut sint, qui dignentur audire: et ne id quidem .gratis : nam et domum mutuatur, et auditorium extruit, et subsellia conducit, et libellos dispergit : et ut bcatissimus re- eitationem ejus eventus prosequatur, omnis ilia laus intra unum aut alteram diem, velut in herba vcl flore praecepta, ad nuUam certam et solidam pcrvcnit frugem : nee aut amicitiam inde refert, aut clieutelam aut mansurum in animo cujusquam bcne- ficium, sed clamorem vagum, et voces inanes, ct gaudium vo- lucre." — C. Cornelii Taciti Dial, dc Oratorihiis, ix. Pliny, in one of his Letters, gives a lively description of the disadvantages which authors had to encounter in this mode of publishing their compositions. " Magnum proventum poctarum annus hie attulit. Toto mense Aprili nuUusfere dies, quo non recitaret aliquis. Ta- metsi ad audiendum pigre coitur. Plerique in stationibus se- dent, tempusque audiendi fabulis eonterunt, ac subinde sibi jiunciari jubent, an jam recitaior intravcrit, an dixerit pra;fa- tionem, an ex magna, parte evolvent librum? Turn demum, ac tuno quoque lente, cunctanterque veniunt, uec tanien re- manent, sed ante fmem recedunt; alii dissimulanter, ac fur- tim; alii simpliciter, ac hbere. Sed tanto magis laudandi probandique sunt, quos a scribendi rccitandique studio haec auditorum vel desidia, vel superbia non retardat. Equidem prope neniini defui: his ex causis longiiis, quamdestinaveranr», tempus in urbe consumpsi. Possum jam repetere secessum, et scribere aliquid, quod non recitem ; ne ridear, quorum re- Additional Notes. 353 citationibus afTui, non auditor fuisse, sed creditor. Nam, ut in cateris rebus, ita in audiendi officio, perit gratia, si repos- catur." — PUn. lib. i, Ep. 13. The poets who could not obtain an audience otherwise, frequented the baths, and other public places, in order to fasten on their friends, and procure an opportunity of reciting their compositions. Juvenal tells us, that the groves and marble columns of Julius Fronto resounded with the vocife- rations of the reciting poets. Frontonis platani, convulsaque marmora clamant Semper, et assiduo rupta; lectore columnae. Expectes eadem a summo, minimoque poeta. Sat, i, ver. 12. The same satirist suggests, that the poet who wished his works to become known, might borrow a house for the pur- pose of public reading ; and that the person who atcoinino- dated the writer, might place his friends and freedmen on i.\v- back seats, with directions to be liberal in their applause. Et si dulcedine famse Succensus recites, Maculonus commodat aedes. Scit dare libertos extrema in parte sedentes Ordinis, et magnas comitum disponere voces. Nemo dabit regum, quanti subsellia constent. Sat. vii, v^r. 5 P. In another place, speaking of Statius, a popular poet, he says : Curritur ad vocem jucundam, et carmen amicse Thebaidos, laetam fecit cum Statius urbem, Promisitque diem; tanta dulcedine captos Aflicit ille animos, tantaque libidine vulgi ,., 'Vol. Ill: 2 A 354 Additional Notes. Auditur ; sed cum fregit subsellla versu, Esurit, intactam Paridi nisi vendat Agaven. Sat. vii, ver. 82. From a passage in Horace it would seem that in his day writers of the first class disdained tb employ this method of obtaining literary fame. Non recito cuiquam, nisiamicis, idque coactus ; Koii ubivis, coramve quibuslibet. In medio qui Scripta foro recitent, sunt multi ; quique lavantes ; Suave locus voci resonat conclusus. Inanes Hoc juvatj haud illud quaerentes, num sine sensu. Tempore num faciant alieno. Sat. lib. i. Sat. iv, ver. 73. Note (3,), page 295. — The following remarks of professor Stewart, on the probable influence of printing upon the future interests of society, are worthy of attention. Whatever may be thought of the truth or falsehood of the opinions which they express, they afford to the contemplative mind materials for very interesting reflections. " The influence which printing is likely to have on the fu- ture history of the world has not, I think, been hitherto ex- amined, by philosophers, with the attention which the im- portance of the subject deserves. One reason for this may probably have been, that, as the invention has never been made but once, it has been considered rather as the effect of a fortunate accident, than as the result of those general causes on which tl?e progress of society seems to depend. But it may be reasonably questioned} how far this idea be just: for, although it should be allowed that the invention of printing was accidental, with respect to the individual who made it, it may with truth be considered as the natural result of a state of the world, when a number of great and contiguous nations Additional Notes. 355 are all engaged in the study of literature, in the pursuit of science, and in the practice of the arts : insomuch, that I do not think it extravagant to affirm, that, if this invention had not been made by the particular person to Avhom it is ascribed, the same art or some analogous art, answering a similar pur- pose, would have infallibly been invented by some other per- son, and at no very distant period. The art of printing, therefore, is entitled to be considered as a step in the natural history of man, no less than the art of writing ; and they who are sceptical about the future progress of the race, merely in consequence of its past history, reason as unphilosophically as the member of a savage tribe, who, deriving his own ac- quaintance with former times from oral tradition only, should affect to call in question the efficacy of written records, in ac- celerating the progress of knowledge and of civilisation. " What will be the particular effects of this invention (which has been, hitherto, much checked in its operation, by the restraints on the liberty of the press in the greater part of Europe) it is beyond the reach of human sagacity to conjec- ture; but, in general, we may venture to predict with confi- dence, that, in every country, it will gradually operate to widen the circle of science and civilisation ; to distribute more equally, among all the members of the community, the ad- yaatages of the political union, and to enlarge the basis of equitable governments, by increasingthe number of those who understand their value, and are interested to defend them. The science of legislation, too, with all the other branches of knowledge which are connected with human improve- ment, may be expected to advance with rapidity ; and, in proportion as the opinions and institutions of men approach to truth and to justice, they will be secured against those revo- lutions to which human affairs have always been hitherto sub- ject. * Opinionum enim commentu dtltt dies, naturce judicia con- firmat.' " Nor must we omit to mention the value which the art of printing communicates to the most limited exertions of literary 2 A2 356 Additional Notes. industry, by treasuring them up as materials for the future examination of more enlightened inquirers. In this respect the press bestows upon the sciences an advantage somewhat analogous to that which the mechanical arts derive from the division of labour. As in these arts the exertions of an un- informed multitude are united by the comprehensive skill of the artist, in the accomplishment of effects astonishing by their magnitude, and by the complicated ingenuity they dis- play; so, in the sciences, the observations and conjectures of obscure individuals on those subjects which are level to their capacities, and which fall under their own immediate notice, accumulate for a course of years; till at last some philosopher arises, who combines these scattered materials, and exhibits, in his sj^stem, not merely the force of a single mind, but the intellectual power of the age in which he lives." — Elements ttf the Philosophy of the Human Mind, chap, iv, sect. 8. I agree with the professor in thinking, tnat "the influence which printing is likely to have on the future history of the world has not been examined, by philosophers, with that at- tention which the importance of the subject deserves." But he has only presented the fair side of the picture. Experience proves, that this precious art is not devoted to laudable pur- poses alone ; and that in estimating its future influence on hu- man happiness, we must take into the account the abuses to which it is liable, as well as the advantages which it tends t» produce. INDEX OF NAMES. Abbot, i 181 Abel, J., ii 151 Abelard, P., ii 420 Abernethy, i 374- Abul Fazel, ii 27 1 note Acerbi, iii 6 note Achard, i 134., 421; ii 100 Acharius, i 180 Achenwall, professor, ii 356 ; iii 175 Acosta, d', i 198 Acquaviva, duke of Alti, iii 109, 110 Adair, James, ii 56, 325 Adams, ii 66, 67 Alex., ii 404 G., i 31, 385 ; iii 348 J., iii 104, 242 note, 247, 250 note, 270, 330 S., iii 247 Adanson, i 160, 179, 182, 270 note ; ii 51 Addison, Joseph, ii 295, ib. note, 296, 297, 298, 303, 306 ; iii 21, 41, 47, 60, 61, 84, ib. note, 85, ib. note, 86, 89 note, 170, 207 note Adelung, J. C, ii 195 note, 202, 317, 318; iii 169 Adet, i 112, 134 Adler, i 25 1 iEpinus, i 29, 30 note, 31, 37, 253, 388; ii 76; iii 161 ^schylus, ii 236, 239 Agrell, ii 48 Aikin, Dr. J., i 318 note; ii 5, 8, 363 ; iii 124 Aitken, Rob., iii 258, ib. note Akber, ii 27 1 note Akenside, Dr. Mark, iii 15 Alanson, i 375 Albinus, i 147, 265, 271, 272, 273 Aldini, prof., i 394 Alembert, d', i 41, 47, 51, 64, 73, 74, 200; ii 73,74, 147 note, 148, 363; iii 111 Alessandri, ii 151 Alexander, W., iii 261, ib.note Alfieri, ii 314; iii 53 Algardi, ii 140, ib.note Allamand, i 25 Allen, jus., iii 214 note AUioni, i 182 Allison, ii 215 INDEX OF NAMES. Allison, Dr. Francis, iii 201, ib. note, 203, 204 note, 21 4-, 239 note, 269 note, 328 Alstedius, iii 110 Alston, i .170, 172, 179, 181 ; ii 3, 5 Anibodick, iii 162 Amiot, ii 240, 284 Amman, i 365 Amontons, i 45, 67 Araory, T., ii 383 note Anacreon, ii 236, 239 Anitschkof, iii 162 Anderson, i 53, 197 Dr. (of New York), ii 146 Jas., ii 103, 105 — (engraver), ii 145 Andrews, J., ii 347 Annan, iii 200 Anne, empress of Russia, ii 157 Anquetil, see Perron Anson, lord, i 359 ; ii 32, ib. note Anspach, marg. of, see Craven, lady Antheaume, i 397 Anthony, Jos., ii 134 note Antoni, d', i 43 Anville, J. B. d', ii 60, ib. note, 61,277 Apligny, d', ii 121 Apollonius of Alexandria, ii 33 1 Apihorp, East, Vn 235, ib. note Aquapendente, see Fabricius Aratus, iii 315 note Arblay, Mrs. d^ ii 381, 382; iii 132 Arbogast, ii 73 Arcy, d', i 44 Arduino, i 236 Argand, ii 123 Argenville, d', i 197 Aristophanes, ii 236 Aristotle, i 168, 188; ii 157, 180, 195, 236, 238, 240, 334, 335, 371 note Arkwright, sir R., Ii 111, ib. note Arraateur, ii 59 Armstrong, Dr. J., iii 15 Arne, f>r. S. A., ii 151 ; iii 47 Arnold, i 83; ii 123 note Dr., ii 151 Ariiould, An., ii 171 Arquier, d', i 405 Arrowsmith, ii 61, 62 Artedi, i 155, ib. note, 276 note Asbury, Fran., iii 347 Aschani, Rog., iii 129 note Asellius, i 263 Ash, Dr., i 339 J., ii 306, .309 Atwatcr, J., iii 312 Aublet, i 184 Audraii, ii 146 Auger, ii 236 Aulus Gellius, ii 237, 239 Austin, i 124 Auteroche, d', ii 45, 56, ib. note Aviceana, ii 109 Avison, C, ii 151 Ayala, don Juan d', ii 33 Ayscough, ii 403 Azyr, Vicq-d', i 273, 276, 30(> INDEX OF NAMES. B. Babo, Hi 55, 178 Bach, ii 151 Bachelier, ii 136 Bacherach, iii 103 Bacon, ii 140 lord, i 118, 259, 312; ii 176, 182, 365; iii 99, 121, 288, 292, 299 note Baczko, ii 350 Baglivi, i 329, 350 Bailey, Nath., ii 307 Baillie, Dr., i 27-1- raiss Jo., iii 43 Bailly, i 89, 216, 235, 2-1-0 note ; ii 358 Baker, G., ii 239 H., i 67, 276 note, 366 Balch, Hezekiah, iii 351 Bancroft, Dr. E., i 63, ib. note, 121 ; ii 59, 121, ib. note Banister, J., i 182, ib. note Banks, ii 140 sir Jos., i 160, 186; ii 33, 36 note Barbauld, Mrs., iii 35, 124, 131 Barbinais, ii 30 Barclay, Dr. H., iii 218, ib. note Bard, Dr. S., ii 19, 20, 21 Baretti, iii 297 note Barker, ii 62 Chr., iii 88 Dr., i 50; ii ll-t Barlow, Joel, iii 68 Barnes, Josh., ii 236, 237 note Barres, du, ii 62 Barrow, ii 48, 176 ]Paruel, abbe, ii 358 Barry, Dr., i 358 note J., ii 134 Barthelemi, J. J., ii 357 note, 358, ib. note Barthez, P. J., i 324 note Bartholin, iii 74 Bartholine, Tho., i 263, 265 Bartholonieo, ii 44 Bartholon, i 384 ; ii 97 Bartolozzi, ii 144, 146 Barton, professor, i 143 note, 1-49, 154, 161, 170 note, 177, 1 84, ib. note, 425, 426, 427 ; ii 5, ib. note, 24, 326, 327 •note, 403 : iii 188 note, 26-1. Bartram, I., iii 328 J., i 184, 426, 429; iii 232, lb, note, 277 note Moses, iii 328 W., i 161, 18-1-, 426; ii 50; iii 277 note Basedow, iii 118, ib. note, 12-1' Basnage, iii 74 Bastaniente, don, ii 40 Baster, i 276 note Bate, Jul., ii 245, 250 Bat hurst, lord, iii 14 note Batsch, professor, i 179 Baltic, ii 236, Battoni, ii 1.10 Baudolocque, i 377 Bauman, iii 175 Baxter, And., ii 212 W., ii236 Bay en, i 109 Bayer, Theoph. S., ii 269, 282, ib. note Bayle, P., ii 362, 367, 371 ; iii 74, 110 Bay ley. Dr. R., ii 21 INDEX OF NAMES. Bayly, ii 249, 276 Baynton, i 374- Beach, iii 235, ib. note Beattie, Dr. James, ii 175, 183 note, 184, 195, 205, 301, 330, 337, 370 note, 374, 404; iii 17, 24 note, 34 Beaumarchais, iii 51, ib. note Beaume, i 134; ii 120 Beaumont, de, iii 124 Beausobre, ii 215 Beauvarlet, ii 146 Beauvois, de, i 179 Beauzee, ii 337 Beccaria, marq. Caes., ii 314 prof. J. B., i 28, 121, 246, 253, 384; ii 150 note Becher, i 95, ib. note, 105, 188, Beck, CD., ii 350; iii 175 prof., ii 202 Beddoes, Dr. T., i 286, ib. note, 290, 350, 865; ii 8, 333 note, 336 note Bedford, duke of, ii 105 Beechy, ii 134 Beeckman, ii 46 Behring, capt., ii 28, 29, ib. note 66 Beighton, i 51, 56; ii 113 Belidor, i 49, 50, 51; ii 114 Belknap, rev. Dr., i 162 note; ii 58, 352, 353 note, 363, ib. note ; iii 104, ib. note Bell, A., i273 — -B., i 371, 373, 374 C, i 271 J., i 271, 374 — of Auchterlony, ii43,45 Bellin, ii 62 Bellini, i 279, 315, 318 Belloy, du, iii 43 note Beloe, W., ii 258, 240 Belsham, T., ii 192 note, 205, 213 note W., ii 347 Bembo, card. P., ii 314 Bendi, ii 240, iii 13 Bennet, rev. A., i 30 Bennett, rev. J., iii 132 Bentley, Dr. R., ii 236, 237, ib. note ; iii 196 note J., ii276 (potter), ii 141 Benzelius, ii 350 Beresford, Jas., ii 239 Bergius, ii 3 Bergman, Torbern, i 98, ib. note, 99, 102, 103, 105, 109, 112, 118, 124, 126, 191, 192, 196, 197, 198, 201, 234, 254, 256 ; ii 3, 95 Berkeley, bishop, i61,62; ii 172, 173, 174,176, 177,180, 185 note, 200, 214, 215 ; iii 209, ib. note Berkenhout, i 181, 186 note, 198 Berkley, Dr., iii 85 Bernier, i 89 Bernouilli, D., i 41, 43, 47, 48, 51 ; ii 74; iii 155 ^** J., i 44, 50, 51 ; ii 74, 114 N., iii 154 Berquin, iii 124 Berthollet, i 63, 111, 121, 124, 134,421 ; ii 120, 121 Berthoud, i 83; ii 32 Bertier, ii 151 Bertrand, L., i 231, ib. Bote INDEX OF NAMES. Bertrand, P., i 228, ib. note Bettinelli, ili 53 Beverley, ii 352; iii 225 Bewick, T., ii 145 Bewley, i 103 Bezout, ii 74 Bianchini, i 89 Biddle, Owen, iii 328 Bidlake, J., iii 32 BIdloo, i 264 Bielfield, baroo, iii 112 Biester, Dr., i 407 Billings, commodore, ii 41 Bion, ii 239 Bird, i 86 Bisset, Dr., ii 388 Black, Dr., i 53, 97, 98, 102, 110, 115, 118,124,133, 198, 199, 245, 255, 256, 267 note, 295, 296, 401, 419; ii 120 Blacklock, Dr., iii 21 Blackmore, sir R., iii 196 note Blackstone (botan.), i 181 . sir W., iii 34S Blackwell, Elizabeth, i 427 Bladen, Mar., ii 239 Bladh, i 25 t Blagden, Dr., i 253 Blair, i 170 Dr. J., iii 14 note prof. H., ii 283 note, 301, 330 ; iii 14 note, 59 note, 63 note, 337, 348 Rob., i 65 rev. Jas., iii 192, ib. note, 193 note, 348 Rob., iii 16 S., iii 201, 202, ib. note. 203, 267 note Blakewell, ii 105 Vol. til Bland, R., ili 243 Blane, Dr., i 363 Blaney, Dr., ii 257 note Blasius, i 276 note Bletterie, ii 240, 244 Bloch, Mark Eleazer, i 156, 159; ill 173 Blodget, ii 62 Bloomer, Josh., iii 22 note Bloomfield, Rob., iii 32 Blumenbach, prof., i 146, 148, 154, 307 ; iii 173 Boccalini, i 26 note Bochart, ii 242 Bode, ii 251, 261 prof,, i 79, 404 Bodini, ii 236 Bodmer, iii 168, 170 . Boerhaave, i 94, 118, 141, 165, 182,280,299,316,317, 318^ 319, 320, 327, 352; ii 15 note, 358 Boethius, iii 315 note Bogdanovitch, iii 163 Bohadsch, i 28, 158, 276 note Boileau, iii 22, 8 t Bois, Fran, du, see Sylvius Boissy, iii 51 Boizot, ii 140 Bollngbroke, lord, ii 297 ; iii 14 note Bolton, i 180 Bom are, i 197 Bond, Dr. Phin., ili 214 note Thos., ii 10, 19; iii 328 Bondt, i 124 'Bonet, i ?j>r)5 Bonetur-, The., i 274 Bonnctt, Charles, i 157, ib. 2 B INDEX OF NAMES. note, 159, 176, 276 note, 308 ; ii 94, 216 Bonnycastle, J., ii 74 Bononcini, ii 151 Boon, ii 56 Borch, count, i 240 note Borda, chev. de la, i 44, 51, 86; ii32 Bordley, ii 100 note, 107 Borelli, prof., i 279, 286, 315, ib. note, 316 Born, bar., i 197, 236 . prof. F. G., ii 202 Bos, Lamb., ii 230 BoscaM-en, W., ii 239 Boscovich, R.J., i 20, ib. note, 21, 22 note, 78, ib. note, 382, 383; ii 54,209; iii 18 Bossu, ii 56 Bossuet, ii 235 Bossut, ab., i 44, 47, 51, Eostock, Dr. J., i 392,393 Boston, rev. T., ii 255 Boswell, Jas., ii 365, 367 note, 387 note; iii 15 note, 297 note Botin, ii 320, 350 Boucher, ii 131 Bouchet, ii 242 Boettiger, C. A., iii 178 Botetourt, lord, iii 246, ib. note Bottger, J. F., ii 121 Boucher, iii 236 Bougainville, i 185; ii 36,37 Bouguer, i 44, 60, 62, 72, 243, 251; ii 59 Boiiilly, iii 52 Boulduc, i 255 Boulton, i 402; ii 115 Bourgelat, i 148 Bouvard, i 73, 80 Bowdoin, Jas., i 89; iii 104, 221 note, 250 note, 261, ib. note, 330, 331, 339 Bo wen, ii 60 Bowles, W. L., iii 37 Boyce, ii 151 Boyle, C. & J., see Orrerj^ eari of, R., i 23, 67 note, 93, 94, 102, 1 1 8, 255, 288, 327 note ; iii 100 Boylston, Dr., i 355, ib. note, 356 N., ill 222 Boze, prof., i 25, 26 ; ii 96 ; iii 173 Braam, van, ii 44 Erachmel, i 189, 190 Bradford, And., iii 91, 92 note W., iii 92, ib. note Bradley, Dr., i 60, 71, ib. note, 74, 75, 79, 80, 83, 404 Richard, i 170; ii 102 Bradshaw, pres., ii 334 note Brady, Nic, iii 21 Braidwood, Thos., i 365, 366 Brailsford, Dr., i 1 8 1 Brnmah, i 46 Brandt, i 199 Braun, iii 172 Bray, Dr. T., iii 226 Breitinger, iii 168, 170 Brewster, ii 239 Breyne,Dr., i 150 Breze, i 256 Bridel, S. E., i 180; iii 173 Bridgwater, duke of, ii 88 Erindley, Jas., ii 88^ 89, ib. note \ INDEX OF NAMES. Brisson, i 58, U1-, 145, 153, ib. note, 195 Brocklesby, Dr., i 363 Bromfield, i 372, 373 Brooke, i 385 iii 12 Mrs., ii 389; iii 132 note Erosses, pres. de, ii 233, 337 des, ii 63 Brotier, ii 236, 237 Brougham, i 61 Broussonet, i 155, 276 note, 309 ; ii 94, 104 Browal, bish., i 189 Brown, C. B., ii 390 Dr. John, i 284, 309, 334, ib. note, 336, 337, ib. note, 345, ib. note SaiH., ii 23 T., ii 419 Browne, ii 44, 49 Dr. Pat., i 182 Bruce, ii 48, 50 note Brucker, ii 358 Brunck, R. F. P., ii 236 Bruns, prof., ii 60, 256 note Bruyere, la, iii 84, ib. note, 85 Bryant, Jacob, i 148; ii 61, 323 ; iii 65 note Buat, chev, de, i 44, 47, 51 Buchan, ii 13 Buchholz, ii 350 Bufjier, pere, ii 182, 183, ib. note, 404 BufTon, count de, i 145, ib. note, 146, 148,150,153, 163, 213,214,215,210,223, 234, 240 note, 308, 309; ii 158, 311; iii 290 Bugge, i 89 Buhle, ii 236 Bulfinger, iii 155 Bulgarus Hugolinus, iii 317 note Bull, Dr. W., ii 15 note; iii 227, 223 note Bulliard, i 179, 182 Bullet, ii 325 Bulwer, i 365 Bunbury, H., ii 133 Burckhardt, i 78, 80; iii 173 Eurdon, Row., ii 1 14 Burg, i 73, 80 Burgoyne, gen., iii 45 Burigni, ii 367 Burke, Edm., ii 64 note, 134 note, 300, 301 note Burkhard, J. IL, i 169, ib. note, ]70 note Burlamaqui, iii 337, 348 Eurmann, prof., i 180, 182; ii 136, 237 Burnet, bp., ii 340 note, 343 j iii 192 note gov., iii 216 note Jas.,seeMonboddo, lord rev. Dr. T., i 204, 206 ; ii 151 ; iii 196 note Burney, ii 237 note Dr.C, ii 148 note, 149 note, 358, 365 miss, see d'Arblay Burns, i 50 ; ii 114 Rob., iii 31, ib. note 35 Burr, Aar., ii 155 note; iii 204 note rev. Aar., iii 204 note, 205 Burrow, Reub., ii 278 Busching, ii 60 2B2 INDEX OF NAMES. Butler, bp., ii 176,205, 215 • Nat., iii 89 S., iii 27 Buxtorf, J,, sen., ii 2-t4', 248, 255 ' jun., ii 244, 255 B3Td, col., iii 225 Byron, capt,, ii 32 C. Cadet, i 134 Cadwallader, Dr., ii 15 Caesar, ii 237, 239 ; iii 343 Ceesarotti, ii 240, ib. note, 314; iii 10 note, 13, 53 Cagliostro, count, ii 13 Cagnoli, i 89 Caille, de la, i 79, 80, 251, 404, 405 ; ii 48, 84 Calamy, Dr. Edm,, jun., iii 196 note Caldani, i 284 Caldwell, Dr., ii 24 Callet, ii 80 Callimachus, ii 236, 239 Camera, i 198 Camerarius, i 169 Camoens, iii 12, 13 note Campbell, Dr. G., ii 214, 215, 337 ■- J., ii 363 (geog.), ii 63 (poet), iii 32 Campe, iii 124 Camper, i 148, 272, 276 Camus, i 72 Caner, Dr. H., iii 235 Canitz, iii 178 Canova, ii 140, ib. note Cant, i 273 Cantemir,- iii 6 Canton, i 28, 39, 121, 247, 253, 384, 397, Capellus, Lew., ii 244, 249 Capperonier, ii 236 Carestini, ii 152 Carey, Mat., iii 257 note W. ii 279 Carl, i 324 Carla, du, i 25 1 Carlini, ii 140 Carlisle, i 34, 390 Carmoy, i 30, 383 ; ii 97 Caroline, queen, i 20 Carr, ii 238 Carradori, i 254, 289 note Carter, Mrs. E., ii 239, ib. note; iii 130 note, 131, ib. note Carteret, capt., ii 32 Cartes, Rene, des, ii 68, 165 note, 167, ib. note, 168, 183, 185, ib. note, 192 Cartheuser, i 197; ii 5; iii 174 Cartvvright, ii 57 Carver, J., ii 56, 325 Cary, iii 277 note Casa, ii 314; iii 84, ib. note, 85 Cassan, i 243 i Cassas, ii 44 Cassini, D., i 72, 73 note, SO J., i 83 de Thury, ii 6 1, ib. note Castiglione, iii 84, ib. note Caswell, i 52 Cat, le, i 62, 211, 212 Catcot, i 209 note Catesby, Mark, i 153, ib. note, 161, 183, ib. note; iii 229, ib. note, 231, 276 note LNDEX OF NAMES. Catharine I, of Russia, iii 155, 156 II, of Russia, ii 52, 322, 321-; iii 154- note, 158, 159, 160, 161 note Catt, le, ii 158 Cattaneo, ii 59 Catteau, ii 320 note, 350 note ; iii 6 note Catton, C, ii 135 Catullus, ii 239 Cavallo, i 31, ib. note, 33, 39, 54,384; iii 348 Cavanilles, ab., i ISO, 182 Cave, E., iii 80, 81 Cavendish, hon. H., i 30, 31, 53, 54, 103, 104, 107, 110, 112, 132, 134,245,248, 388, 419, 421 Cavi^lej'-, i 400 Caylus, count, ii 136 Celsius, bish. O. O., ii 350 prof., i39,72, 132, IS2, 420 . Celsus, i 352 Cepcde, la, i 153, 15 1, 15 Q, 160 note Ceruti, ii 240 Cervantes, Miguel de, ii 372, 377 Chabart, ii 42 Chalmers, Dr. Lionel, ii 17; iii 228, ib. note Chambers, Eph., iii 110, 111 Champagne, ii 240 Chandler, Dr. T. B., iii 219, ib. note, 236 1- R., ii 54 Chanler, I., iii 229, ib. note Chapone, Mrs., iii 131 Chappe, i 67, 68 see Auteroche, d' Cliaptal, i 121, 134, 178, 197; ii 120; iii 343 Charas, i 276 note Charles, i 55 Charleton, i 183 Charlevoix, ii 56, 57, 325 Charmes, Fajot de, ii 120 Clirrpcnticr, i 236 Chateauvicux, ii 104 Chatelet, mad., iii 132, ib. note Chatt^ton, T., iii 62, 64, ib. note, 65, 66, ib. note, 67 note Chaucer, ii 66 note, 315 note Chaudet, ii 140 Chauncey, iii 183, 223 note Dr. C, iii 23 t, ib. note Chau5see, iii 51 Chenier, ii 48 Cherachi, ii 140 Choselden, i 265, 272, 500, 370, 373 Chesterfield, lord, iii 24 note Chiabrera, ii 313 Chisholm, Dr., i 362, 368; ii 8 Chladni, Dr., i5l); ii 150 Chomel, ii 3 Churchill, ii 63 C, iii 25 Churchman, i 38, 39, ib. note Cibber, Col., iii 44 Cibot, ii 284 Cicero, ii 236, 239, 365, 403; iii 199 note, 268, 315 note, 340, 343 Cigna, i 289, 290, 335 Cignani, ii 123, 130 INDEX OF NAMES. Circaud, i 394 Clairaut, i 64, 72, 75, 80; ii 73, 74, 75 Clap, T., iii 223, ib. note, 261 Clarendon, lord, ii 295, 301, 340 note, 343 Clarke, Dr., iii 268 J., i 363 • S., i 20, 382; ii 180, 205, 212, 213, 236, 237, ib. note J., ii239 R., iii 229, 230 note Claudian, ii 237, Clavigero, ii 56, 325, 350 Gayton, Dr. J., i 184, ib, note; iii 233, ib. note, 277 note ~ sir R., iii 17 note Cleghorn, i 352, 338 Clerc, !e, ii 54 Dan. le, ii 358 J. le, 11216; iii 74 Clesmur, du, ii 37 Clipperton, ii 30 Clos, du, i 255 Clossey, Dr. Sam., ii 19,20 Cockburn, Mrs. C, iii 131 Coke, ii 103 — -T., iii 34-7 Colbert, J. B., iii 100 Colden, Cadw., i 89, ib. note, 184, ib. note; ii 352; iii 231, ib. note, 262, 276 note Dr., i 355 note; ii 17, ib. note — -r miss, i 184 note; iii 23 1 note Colebrook, Josh., ii 136 Colebrooke, ii 278, ib. note Coleman, i 276 note Coleridge, S.T., iii 9 note, 35 Collier, Arth., ii 173 Collins, i 276 note And., ii 205, 207, 212 note Dav., ii 39 I., iii 259 W., iii 33, ib. note, 34 CoUinson, Peter, i 170 note, 426; ii 16 note; iii 213, ib. note, 233 note Collyer, ii 60 Colman, G., ii 239 ; iii 45 jun., iii 46 Columbus, i 262 ; ii 35 Combruue, ii 120 Coraaielin, i 182 Commerson, i 185 Comolli, ii 140 Condamine, i 72; ii 59 Condillac, ii 215, 330, 337 Condorcet, i 41 note, 44, 104, 186 note; ii 73, 203, 368, 383 note; iii 144, 149 Confucius, ii 281 Congreve, W., ii 132; iii 41^ 59 Cook, captain Jas., i 359, 360 note ; ii 29 note, 34, ib. note, 55 note, 36, 37, 39, 40, 49 note, 51, 66 Cooke, ii 239 Cooper, Dr., i 181 Myles, iii 236, ib. note Coote, ii 347 Copley, J. S., ii 130, ib. note, 155; iii 266 Corelli, prof., ii 147 Cornette, i 256 INDEX OF NAMES. Cortlandt, Phil, van, iii 220 note Cosmo III of Tuscany, i 122 Costard, G., ii 261 Cotte, de la, i 243, 25 1 Cotton, iii 188 Cotunnjus, i 272 Coulomb, i 33 Couplet, ii 280 Courtanveaux, ii 42 Coventry, i 252 Coward, Dr. W., ii211 Cowley, Abr., iii 3, ib note Mrs., iii 46, 132 note Cowper, W. (poet), ii 238, 367 note; iii 13, ib. note, 20, ib. note, 21,25, 35, 71 (surg.), i 264, 265, 273 Coxe, W., ii 53, ib. note, 321 note, 322 note, 365 ; iii 154 note Craig, J., ii 73 Cramer (math.), ii 74, 75 (poet), iii 22, 170, 172, 177 Crantz, i 182 Dav., ii 57 note Craven, lady, ii 54; iii 132 note Craufurd, G., ii 278 Crawford, i 1 18, 124, 133, 291, 2P6, 2!)7 Crebillon, sen., iii 49 jun., ii 379; iii 50 Creech, T., ii 239 Crell, i 117, 135; iii 174 Crenne, de Verdun de la, ii 32 Creutz, count de, ii 320; iii 5 Creve, i 389 Crevier, li 236 Croft, Herb., ii 303 note ; iii 66 note, 67 note Croix, de la (poet), i 170 note ; iii 16 note, 18 note : — (math.) ii 73 Croker, H.T., iii 112 Cronstedt, F., i 124, 189 note, 190, 198, 199, 236 Crousaz, ii 216 Crozat, ii 56 Croze, la, ii 251 Cruger, iii 55, 178 Cruickshank, i 34, 134, 270, 275, 390 Crutwell, ii 63 Cruz, don J. de la, ii 59, ib. note Cuff, i 67 Cullen, Dr. E., ii 150 W., i 1 12, 306, 330, ib. note, 331, 332, 333, 336, 350, 352; ii 5,'l7 Culpepper, i 67 Cumberland, ii 237 — ' , R., iii 8, 45 Cumming, Dr. J., ii22; iii 253, ib. note Cummings, Alex., iii 202 nole Cun3eus, i 25 Currie, Dr., i 352, ib. note ; ii 7, 24; iii 31 note Currj'^, ii 57 Curtis, i 180, 131 Cuthbertson, i 52, 385 Cutler, Dr. Manas., i 184, ib. note, 251 ; iii 264 Tijn., iii 222, ib. note Cuvier, i 151, 15S, 276, 307, 422, 423, 424 INDEX OF NAMES. D. Dacier, mad., ii 210; iii 130 note, 132, ib. note Dahl, ii 128 Dahlberg, i 186 Dahlin, ii 320,-350; iii 5, 11, 36, 56 Dalgarno, i 365 Dalibard, i 27 Dallaway, ii 54- Dalrymple, Al., ii 62, 63 Dalton, i 58, 251,253 Damer, hon. Mrs., ii 140, ib. note ; iii 132 note Dante, ii 36 Dantz, prof., ii 2^9 Darcet, i 123 Darcu, ii 240 Darley, A., ii 114 Dartmouth, lord, iii 242 note Darwin, Dr. Er., i 134, 177, 179, 188 note,' 235, 309, 338, ib. note, 339, 340, 341, 344, 345, ib. note, 346 note, 350, 385, 397 ; ii 5, 46 note, 94, 96, 97, 104, 200, 21 1, 408, 410,411,412,413, 414,415, 416, 417, 418, 419; iii 16, 17 note, 67 note, 132 Daubcnton, i 148, 150, 194, 276 Davenport, J., iii 183, 189 note David, ii 131 ' Davidson, Jos., ii 239 Davies, S., iii 202 note, 267, ib. - note Davis, i 407 note, 413, 414 S., ii 276 292, 293, ib. note, 297, 350 390, 391, 392, 393, 422 Davy, major, ii 268 Dawes, i 80 Day, S., iii 124 Debevn, i 197 Degen, ii 236 Degrandprc, ii 50 Dehl, ii 141 Dclambre, see Lambre, de Delametherie, i 134, 197, 225, 225^ 234 Delany, Mrs., i 428 Delaval, i 63 ; ii 121, 150 Delisle, ab., iii 18, 19 note, 30 see Isle, de 1' Delor, i 27 Democritus, i 76 note Demosthenes, ii 236, 238, 240 ; iii 343 Denham, sir J., iii 3 Denman, Dr., i 377 Dennis, iii 74 Deparcieux, Ant., ii 72 Derschaven, iii 163 Desaguliers, Dr., i 24, 49, 50, 51, 53, 243; ii 114; iii 348 Desfontaines, i 160, 177, 185, 308 ; ii 94 Desmond, W., ii 120, ib. note Destouches, Phil., iii 50 Dexter, Dr. Aar., ii 22; iii 263 Dlbdin, iii 46 Dickinson, J., iii 247, ib. note, 251, 346 '- Jon., iii 198, 204 note, 205 Dickson, Dr., Steph., i 126, 127 Jas.>. i 179 Davy, i 34, 103, 118, 134,289, Dicquemare, i 276 note INDEX OF NAMES. Diderot, ii 378, 379, 388; iij 50, 111 Didot, ii 117, ib. note Dieman, i 124- Biemerbroeck, prof., i 363f Dietricli, ii 130 Dillenius, prof. J. J., i 172, ISO, ib. note, 181 Diodorus Sic, ii 230 Dion Casslus, ii 230 Dixon, capt., ii 29 note, 39 Dobritzhofter, |i 59 Dobson, Mr?., ii Si65i iii ^33 note — - T.^ iii 143, ib. riote, 257 note Doddridge, Dr. Phil., iii 21, 193 note, 223 note, 337, ^39 Dodson, Jas., ii 72, 74f Dodwell, H., ii 211, 212, ib. note Doederlein, Dr. J. C, ii 254, 255 note Dollond, i 64, 402 Dolomieu, i 197, 237, 240 note Dombey, i 160, 185, 237 Donati, i 158, 159, 276 note Donovan, i 157 Dorat, iii 52 Dorthes, i 121 Dotterville, ii 240 Douglas, Dr. W., i 355, ib. note, 356 qote r Jas., i 265 Dow, Alex., ii270, 275 Downey, W., i 425 Downman, Dr. Hugh, iii 17 Drake, Dr. N., i 6 note ; iii 11 note, 37 Drakenborch, ii 236, 237 Vol. III. Dran, le, i 372 Praytoii^ W. H., iii 248^ ib. note Driessen, ii 261 note DrumniQnd, W., ii 239; ii^ 36 Drury, i 157 Dryden, J., ii 295 ; iii 2, ib. note, 4, 13, 22, 44, 51, 59 Dubelloy, iii 50 Duclie, Jac, iii 215 note Dudley, Paul, iii 231 Dufay, i 63; ii 121 Duhamel, i 176, 30S! Duker, ii 236, 237 Dulaney, D., iii 248, ib. note Dummer, Jer., iii 196 Duncan, ii 239 Dr., ii 1 1 ■ J., iii 343 Dnndonald, lord, i 134; ii 94, 96, 97 Dunkelberg, K., iii 168 Dunning, ii 334 not^ Dunster, iii 188 Dunthorne, i 80 Dupuis, ii 245 Durell, ii 25 1 Dusch, J., iii 19< 178 Dutens, i 6 ^ote, 26 note, 169 note; ii 173 note Duval, Grafton', i 425 Duvaucel, i 89 D>yight, Dr. Tim., ii 25 note ; iii 67, 104, 243, 341 Dyer, J., iii 15 E. Earle, sir Jas., i 373 Eaton, iii 188 2C INDEX OF NAMES. Ebeling, prof., ii 60, lb. note ; Emmons, Dr., iii 268 iii 175 Empedocles, i ltj8 Eberhard, ii 202 Enfield, Dr. W., ii 35S, 363 ; Edgeworth, Maria, iii 1 19, 121-, iii 337 132 Engel, J. PI., 1 235; ill 171 R. L., iii 119 J. J., iii 55, 178 Edwards, Bryan, ii 50 note, Englefiekl, sir H., i 78, lb. 349 note note Dr. Jon., 11 325, 326 Entrecasteaux, ii t2 note, 407 Epee, abbe de T, 1 366, ib. T., ii 2 17 ; 111196 note note Epictetus, 11 236, 238; iii 131 G., 1 152, lb. note note J., 1 66 Epicurus, ii 208, 235 note Jon., 11 205, 206, lb. Erasmus, 11 365, 367 note ; iii 208, ib. note, 267, Ernest, J. C. G., 11 236, 237 ; ib. note, 268, 338 Hi 178 Eeles, 1 385 Erpenius, ii 24-2, 260 Egede, Hans, 11 57 note Erskine, T., 11 376 note Eichhorn, prof., ii 251, 256; Erving, W., ii 22, ib. note; ill 179 ill 253, lb. note, 336 Elani, Sam., ill 341 Estala, 11 63 Elhuyart, de, 1 199 Estrange, sir Rog. V, ill 90 Eliot, rev. Dr., i 356 note, 418 ; Etches, capt,, ii 39 ill 104, 105 note, 188, 241 Eton, ii 54 note, 253 note, 257 Euclid, ill 337, 343 Ellcr, 11 96 Eugenlus, abp. of Slavensk, ii EUicott, 1 90; ill 262 240; Hi 164 note Ellis, 1 67 Euler, L., i 38, 39, 44, 45, 48, J., 1 159, 161, ISO, 276 64, 73, 75, 80; ii 72, ib note note, 74, 75, 76, 84; Hi 154 W., 11 103 Euripides, 11 236, 239 ; Hi 315 ii 238 note Elizabeth, emp\, iii 158 Eustachius, 1 262 queen. Hi 129 note Eustathius, 11 233 Elllven, iii 163 Eutroplus, 11 237 Elphinstone, Jas., 11 304, 305 Evans, Lew., 11 58 Elvius, i 50; ii 115 Evelyn, J., 11 92 Emerson, 1 45, 50; H 70, 73, sir G. S., i 52, "243 ; ii 75, 114 .78 note INDEX OF KAIMES. Ewing, Dr. J., i 85, 89; iii 238, 239, ib. note, 262, 269 note, 328 Fabricius, ii 236 ab. Aquapendente, 1 262 J. C, i 157, ib. note, 158, ib. note Fabroni, i 35, 198, 389, 392 Fabrouius, ii 364 Faden, Wm., ii 59 note Fahrenheit, i 120, 121, 131, 133, 420 Fairchild, i 170 Falk, J. P., iii 161 Falconer, Dr. W., i 26 note 421 W., iii 31, ib. note Falkener, father, ii 59, ib. note Fallopius, i 262 FarincUi, ii 152 Farquhar, G., iii 44, ib. note Fasch, ii 151 Faujas, i 197 Fawkes, Fran., ii 239 Fay, ii 120 du, i 24, 27, 28, 29 Fazcl, Abul, ii 27 1 note Feder, ii 202, 216; iii 118, ib. note Fenelon, abp., ii 385 ; iii 132 Feraud, abbe, ii 31 1 Fcrbcr, i 198, 236, 240 note Ferguson, ad., ii 347 Jas., i 84, 89 ; iii 337 Fcrislita, ii 270 note Ferrein, ii 5 Fcrriar, Dr., i 329 note Feuillie, ii 30 Fielding, H., ii 298, 374, ib. note, 375, 376, ib. note, 377, 380, 382, 397 note Finley, Dr. Sam., iii 202, ib. note Jas., iii 202 note Fiamingo, ii 140 Fischer, F. F., ii 237 (mu3.), ii 151 Fisher, iii 227 note Fitzgerald, Dr., ii 249, ib. note 250 Fitch, Dr. Ebe., iii 338 Flanistcad, rev. J., i 70, ib. note, 405, 412 Flatt, prof., ii 202 Flaxman, ii 140 Florian, ii 389 Florinsky, iii 161 Floras, ii 237 Fobes, iii 261 Focrsch, ii 46, ib. note Fontaines, des, see Desfon- taines Fontana, abbe, i 102, 103, 134, 154, 276 note, 307, 309 Fontenelle, ii 311, 363; iii 34, 47 Foote, Sam., iii 46 Ford, sir Fran., ii 97 Fordyce, Dr. G., i 368 Jas,, iii 1 32 Forrest, ii 42, 46, 47 Forskaol, i 276 note Forster, Dr. G., i 185 ^J.R., i 147,ib. note, 184, 186, 234, 253 ; ii 36 note, 44, 278, 323; iii 173 Forsyth, W., ii 103 Fortis, abbe, i 150 2 C 2 ■ INDEX OF NAMES. Foster, ii 112 hote j'othergill. Dr., i 170 note, 368, ib. note; ii 9 ; iii 199 note Poulis, And., ii 117 Fourcroy, i 33, 34, 103, 110 note. 111, 124, 178> 197, 256, 290, 3i9, 391 i^ourmont, ii 282 Fowle, Dan.i iii 92 Vovvler, Dr., i 33 Francis, Mrs., iii 132 note I of Germany, i 123 Ph., ii 239 Tench, iii 214 note Franckling, T., ii 238, 239 Franklin, Dp. B.j i 26, ib. note, 27i ib. note, 28, 53, 121, 1^35, 244, 246, 251, ib. note;, 253, 356 note, 386, 388 ; ii 16 note, 44, 123, 149, 150, lb. note, 268, 304 ; iii 76, 81, fel note, 103, 199 note, 206, ib. note, 207 note, 209,212, 213, ib. note, 214 note, 215, 219 note, 221 note, 238, 242 note, 250 note, 328, 331 i. Jas., i 356 not6 ; iii 91, ib. not'e, 92 i^rederic II of Prussia> iii 1 85, ib. note Frediatofsky, iii 6 Freeman, rev. Dr., iii 10^ note Freneavi, iii 68 Fresnoy, Langlet du, ii 359 note Frezier, ii 30 Frisch, i 150, 153; iii 168, 173 Frisi, i 89 Fronfo, Julius, iii 353 Fry, ii 62 Fryanfynofsky, iii 159 notii Fuchs, ii 1 5 1 Fulda, iii 169 Fulhame, Mrs., i 127 Furneaux, capt., ii 39 Fuseli, ii 130, 135 Fyfe> i 270i271, 273 G. Gabriel, don, ii 237, ib. notd Gabrielli, ii i52 Gsertner, Jos., i 177 ; iii 17$ G&hn, i 122, 124, 196, 199 Gail, prof, ii 236, 240 Gainsborough, ii 134, 135 Gale, Dr. Ben., ii 8 note, 16 Galen> i 299i 311, 312, 317j 35^ Galileo, i i3]2 Galletti, J. G; J.> ii 349; iii 175 Gallissdiiierre, niarq. de la, i 183, ib. note Gallowdy, Jos., iii 247, 24S note, 249 note Galvani, Dr., i 31, 32, 3^ Garden> Dr. Alex., i 153, 154- note, 16i, 183; ii 9, 17 ; iii 228, 229, 230 note, 231, 270 note Gardeyef, iii 163 Gardner, ii 80 Garnett, Dr, T., i 34 note, 36 note, 156 note, 197, 256 ; i| 141 note Garrick, Dav., iii 45 Garth, Dr. S., ii 239 Garve, Christ., i394; iii 171 Gassendi, i 253 INDEX OF NAMES. Catterer, iii 1^5 "Gaubius, i S24, ib. note, 325 Gaultier, abbe, iii 124- Gay, J., iii 33, 47 "Gebauer, iii 175 Gebelin, Court de, i 148; ii 311, 323, 337 Ged, W., ii H6, ib. note, 117, ib. note tleer, de, i 157 Gellert, i 197 ; iii 174 C, F., ii 316 J iii 5> 22, 170, 176, 177 Cengembre, i 103 Genlis, mad. de, ii 389 ; iii ll9, 124 Gentil, le, ii 276, ib. note, 284 Geoffrey, i 157 Geoffroy, i 94, 112, 170, 276 note ; ii 3 George the First, ii 31 the Third, iii 242 note Dr., iii 230 note Gillies, Dr. J., ii 238, 239, 34t Gilpin, ii 135 Gioannetti, i 259 Giobert, i 178; ii 95 Gioenni, chev., i 198, 241 note Giordano, ii 128, 130 Girard, ab., ii 337 Giraudet, ii 131 Girtanner, Dr., i 117, 125,291, 349 Gisborn6i T., iii 32 Gladwin> Fran., ii 268 Gleditsch> prof., i 175 Gleigj Dr., i 22 note, 30 note Gleim-, F. W., iii 5, 177 Glenie, Jas., ii 7 1 Glisson, Dr., i 266 Glover (of Virginia), i 161, ib. note — R., iii 8, ib. note Gluck, ii 151 236, 253, 308 j ii 5 note, 44, 45, 53; iii 161, 173 Gobien, C.> ii 44 note, 269 note Godfrey, Thds., i 85, 406,407, ib. note, 408, 415, ib. note, 416, 417 ; ii 84; iii 261* !&66 ; ' jun., i 417 Godin, i 72; ii 59 Godwin, Mrs. M. W., ii 383 ; iii 133 W., ii 203, 302 notey 388; iii 144, 149 Goethe, J.W. von, ii 316, 389; INDEX OF NAMES. iii 25, 30, 5i, 55 note, 176, 178 Goeze, i 139 Goldoni, C, iii 54, ib. note Goldsmith, 01., ii 298, 34-7, 355, ib. note 381, ib. note, 397 note ; iii 31, 45, 56 note, 71 Golius, ii 242, 260 Gollikof, iii 163 Golovin, iii 162 Gomarus, ii 246 note Gooch, i 373 Goodwin, Dr., i 294 Gordon, ii 60 T., ii 259 Gosec, ii 151 Gosselin, ii 61 Gossett, ii 140 Gottsched, J. C, iii 4, 168, 169 Gouan, i 155, 173, 182, 276 note Goudin, i 81 Gough, Dr. J. P., ii 101 note Goulard, ii 8 Gousset, ii 261 note Gi-aaf, de, i 263 Graevius, ii 235 Graham, Geo., i 44, 84, ib. note, 85, 86 Mrs. C. M., ii 347, 355, ib. note; iii 131 Grainger, Jas., ii 239 Gralath, i 25 Granelli, iii 53 Grange, de la, i 51, 78, 75, 291; ii73, ib. note, 74 Granger, Jas., ii 362 Grant, ii 51 Graun, ii 151 Graviua, ii 313 Gravesaude, i 44, 52 Gray, ii 249 lady Jane, iii 129 note T., ii 365 ; iii 35, 38, ib. note, 66 note Green, B., iii 91 S., iii 188 note W., ii 246, ib. note Greene, ii 151 Greenland, miss, ii 136 Green\A'ay, iii 277 note Greenwood, iii 261 Gregory, Dr. G., i 55 note J., iii 132 ■ Jas., ii 205 Jas., i 65 ; ii 68 rev. G., ii 246 note XIII, pope, i 88 ; ii 88 note Gren, i 124,257, 291 Gresset, iii 28, 36, 51 Gretry, ii 151 Greuze, ii 134 Grew, Dr., i 169, 170, 175, SOS Theoph., iii 200, ib. note Grey, Steph., i 24, 66 Grierson, Mrs. Con., ii 236, ib. note, 237 ; iii 130 note, 132,. ib. note Griesbach, ii 252 note Griffiths, ii 62 Grischow, i 89 Gronovius, i 156, 162 J., ii 236, 237 J. F., ii 235, 229 note, 233 note Grosier, ab., ii 44, 281, 284 Grosser, de, i 121 INDEX OF NAMES. Grossman, iii 55, 178 Grout, Jon., i 03 note Grove, ii 215 Guarinus, ii 2 t-t Guerrin, ii 210 (paint.), ii 131 Guettard, J. S., i 176 GuirhartI, ii 1 tl Guglielmini, i 4G, t? Guido, ii 128 Guignes, ii 282 Guillot, Merin, i 125 Guldenstttdt, ii .53 ; iii IGI Gusman, Bar., : 53 Guthrie, W., ii 00, ib. note, 63, 239 Guys, ii 54- Guyton-Morveau, i 110, ib. note. 111, 113, 122, 123, 134, 254, 421 Gwither, Dr., ii 158 Gyllenborg, ii 90 count dc, ii 320; iii 5, 12, 30, 50 H. Haberlin, ii 349; iii 175 Hackman, iii 102 Hadley, i 51, 05, 85, 400, 407, 417; ii 84 Haen, von, i 308; iii 174 riagar. Dr. Jos., ii 284, 285 note Ilagedorn, iii 19, 177 Hagen, i 180 Ilaiter, ii 234 note Ilaldane, Col., i 390 Halde, J. B. du, ii 44, ib, note, 209 note, 281 Ilales, rev. Dr., i 97, ib. note, 102, 103, 110, 125, 166, 170, 251, 288, 308, 363; ii 94, 96, 97 Halhed, N. B., ii 27 1, 272, 273, ib. note, 278 Hall, iii 215 note Chester More, i 402, 403 Hallenberg, ii 350 Haller, baron A., i 174, 175, 182, 208, 272, 273, 274, 275, 280, 281, ib. note, 282, 283, 284, 285, 287, 307, 309, 318 note, 324 note, 330; ii 158, 310; iii 4, 5, 19, 30, 177 Halley, Dr. Edm., i 38, 52, 58, 70, ib. note, 71 note, 77, 80, 82, 231, 243, 248, 251, 253, 407, 415, 410; ii 71; iii 190 note Harnel, du, i 124; ii 04, 102, 104 Hamersley, Dr. W., ii 21 Hamilton, iii 270 — ^ Dr. Hugh, i 243, 244,^ ib. note, 377 ; ii 75 (of Dublin), i253 miss, ii 388 ; iii 11.9, 132 sir W., i 240 note, 248 Hammond, Jas., iii 38 Hampton, ii 239 Hancock, J., iii 222 note T., iii 221 note, 222, ib. note, 330 Handel, G. F., ii 14P, 152 Hanmer, sir T., Iii 48 Hanway, ii 41' Hardie, iii 232 note Hardouin, ii 237 INDEX OF NAMES. Hare, bish. F., ii 2 15, 246 note Haynes, iii 188 Hargrave, Jas,, ii 110 HaySj Mary, ii 388; \\\ 135 Harmer, rev. T., ii 288 Haywood, H., iii 229, 230 note Harpe, la, iii 49 note Hazard, Eb., i 417 ; ii 3.59, ib. Harris, ii 62, 63 note Dr. J,, i 62; iii 1 10, Hearne, Sam., ii 54 ib. note Heatji, ii 146 Jas., ii 191, 213, 331, Heberden, 1368 ib. note, 332, 335 Heckewalder, i 162 note; ii W., ii 367 326 note Harrison, J., i 83 ; ii 123 note Hedouville, iii 74 note Hartley, Dr. Dav., i 149; ii Hedwig, i 179; iii 173 189, ib. note, 191, 192 note, Heeren, iii 178 193, 205, 209, 331, 406, 407 Hehl, i 40 Hartlib, ii91 Heinecke, i 366 Harvard, J., iii 335 Heinrjch, ii 349; iii 175 Harvey, Dr., i 143, 262, 263, Heister, L., i 270, 273, 369; 305 iii 174 Harwood, ii 236 note prof., i 169 note, ^79 Haskins, i 51 Heliodorus, bish. of Tricca, ii Hasse, prof., ii 256; iii 179 370, ib. note, 371 Hasselquist, i 182 Hellot, i 63 ; ii 121 Hassenfratz, i 112, 178, 197, Helmont, van, i 102,314,3^9 254, 256, 290, 292; ii 94, Helms, ii 59 95, 97 Helsham, iii 348 Hastings, War., ii 265, 270, Helvetius, CI. A., i 489 ; ii 202, 271 note ib. note, 388 note; iii 144|, Hatchett, i 125, 126 149 Hatton, T., ii 77, 78 note Hemsterhuisi, Tib., ii 229, ib. Hauy, i 197 ; ii 76 note, 230 note, 236, 332, ib. Havercamp, ii 237 note Havves, Dr., i 367 Henkel, i 135; iii 174 Hawkesworth, Dr. J., ii63, 298 Henley, i 384 Hawkins, i 373 Henry, ii 57 sir J., ii 358 Dr., iii 63 note Hawksbee, i 24, 52, 58 Rob., ii 347, '^55^ Haydn, ii 148, 151 ib. note Haye, ii 239 Hugh, iii 202 note Hayley, W., ii 367 note; iii Math., iii 196 note 17, 20 note, 27 W., i 134, 390; ii 121 INDEX OF NAMES. Herbelot, d*, ii 242, 260 Herder, J. G., i 14.9; ii 202, 248, 316,330, ib. note, 389; iii 10 note, II note, 22, 171, ib. note, 176, 178 Heretier, 1', i 180 Herlet,J., i 158 Hermann, Dr. Paul, i 165, ib. note, 234, 327 note Hermbstadt, i 135 Hermes, F. J., ii 389 Hero, i 399 Herodotus, ii 236, 238, 240; iii 352 Herring, abp., iii 218 note Herschel, Dr., i 66, ib. note, 68,74, 75, 76, 79, 86, 118, 120,121,4O4,405,42O;iiil73 Hersey, Dr. Abn., ii 22; iii 253, ib. note, 336 Ezek., ii 21 ; iii 253, ib. note, 336 Hervas, J. L., ii 324 Hesiod, ii 236, 239, 240; iii 159 note Heusinger, iii 178 Hevelius, i 405 Hewson, i 269, 270, 275 Heyne,C.Q., ii236; iii 178 Hezel, prof. W. F., ii 256, 261 ; iii 179 Hielm, i 199 Hierne, i 188, 190, 255 Higgins, Dr. W., i 134; ii 123 Hill, sirJ., i 177, 181, 189; ii 5,94 Hillary, i 368 Hillegas, aldn., i 417 Hindenbourg, ii 73 Hipparchus, i 405 Vol. hi. Hippocrates, i 318, 352 Hire, de la, i 62, 80 Hirt, prof., ii 256 ; iii 179 Hitt, ii 102 Hoadley, Dr. Ben., iii 45, ib. note Hobbes, ii 176, 207, 208 Hodges, ii 44 Hodgson, Dr., ii 257 note Hoest, ii 48 Hoffman, Dr. F., i 199, 266, 306, 326,-327, ib. note, 328, 329, 330, 332; ii 17; iii 17,4 G. F., i 180 Hogarth^ W., ii 131, 132 Holberg, baron, iii 56, ib. note Holcroft, T., ii 388 ; iii 30 note. 45 Holden, S., iii 336 Holder, i 365 Hole, R., ii 232 note ; iii 9 Holland, ii 62 Hollis, T., iii 221, ib. note, 336 Hollmann, i 216; ii 216 Holme, iii 196 note Holmes, R., i 425 Holwell, J. Z., ii 270, ib. note, 275 Homberg, van, i 134 Home, Dr. F., i 276 note; ii 120 E., i 374 J., iii 42, ib. note, 53 note, 61 Homer, ii 231, 232, ib. note, 233, 235, 237, 238, 240, 374 note, 417 ; iii 13 note, 63, 159 note, 336. 3J3 H., ii 236 2D tSDEX OF NAMES. Hoogeveen, H., ii 230, ib. note Hook, Dr., i 286, 288 Hooke, R., i 67 note ; ili 100 Hooker, ii 295; iii 183 Hoole, J., iii 12 Hope, prof., i 124-, 172, 180, 199 Hopkins, iii 188 Dr., iii 267, 33^ Hopkinson, Fran., iii 215 note T., i 27; iii 214- note, 215 Horace, ii 236, 239, 240; ili 28, 159 note, 336, 343, 354 Horn, van, i 265 Home, bish., i 18, 381 Horneman, ii 50, ib. note Horsefield, Dr., i 181 Horsley, bish., ii 205 Hosack, Dr. D., i 187 note, 429 Hospital, r, ii 75 Houbigant, C. Fran., ii 241- Houdon, ii 140 Houghton, ii 49 Houstoun, i 182 Howard, J., i 364, ib. note Ph., i 223, 226, 227 note, 228, 2 tO note Howe, iii 243 Howell, ii 62 Huddart, ii 62 Hudson, i 172, J81 J., ii 261,277 Huet, ii 235 Hufeland, i 348 ; iii 174 Hugolinus, B., iii 317 note Hulme, Dr., i 377 Humboldt, von, i 33, 125, 178, 421 ; ii 94, 97 ; iii 173,. 174 plume, Dav., i 9 note; ii 174» ib. note, 175, 176, 177, 180, 185 note, 195, 200,201, 205, 214, 215, 297,301, 303,344, 3t5; iii 129 note, 175 Humpage, i 268 Humphreys, iii 68 Hunt, Dr., ii 256 Huntingdon, countess of, iii 242 note Hunter, ii 278 capt., ii 39 Dr. And., i 309 W., i 148, 150,266, ib. note, 268, 271, 275, 287, 306, 363, 570,373, 377 J., i 148, 266 note, 275, 304, 305, 306, 370, 373, 375, 389 Hutcheson, Dr. Fran., ii2I5 Hutchins, ii 56, 62 Hutchinson, gov., ii 352; iii 249 note J., i 15, 16, 18, ib. note, 209, ib. note, 556 note, 379, 381, 382; ii 244, 248 T., iii 247 Hutton, Dr. C, i 42, 44 note, 244; iii 115 ■ J., i 222, ib. note, 223, 248 Huxham, Dr., i 368 ; ii 8 nott Huygens, i 64; ii 6S, 77 Huysum, ii 1 35 Hyde, Dr. T., ii 242, 264 I. Iffland, iii 55, 178 INDEX OF NAMES. 2hre, prof. J., ii 319, 320, 325 Ilinski, iii 6 linlay, G., ii 58, 62 Inchbald, Mrs., ii 389 j iii 40, .1 32 note Ingenhousz, i 30, 121, 125, 178, 308, 383, 384, 418; ii 94, 96 ; iii 174 Inglis, Dr., iii 236 note Inokhodzof, iii 162 Irodionof, iii 162 Irvine, Dr., i 118, 133 Isle, del", i 132, 420; iii 155 Rome de 1', i 195, 196 ; ii 76; iii 155 Wm. de 1*, ii 61, ib. note Isocrates, ii 236, 239 Isoeus, ii 239 Israeli, d', ii 371 note, 388 Jvanof, iii 163 Jackson, Dr., i 362, 3S8 jiacob, Giles, iii 1 15 Jacquin, prof., i 59, 135, 182; ii 94,97; iii 173, 174 Jakob, prof., ii 202 Jallabert, i 26, 28 ; ii 96 Jamison, i 197 JaufFret, i 147 Jauvenet, ii 128, 130 Jay, J., iii 242 note, 270 Jefferson, T., i 162 note; ii5S, 62, 78, ib. note, 326 ; iii 103, 248 Jenisch, D.^ ii 324 Jenncr, Dr., i 357, 358 note Jenty, i 27 1 Jervas, ii 128, 137, ib. note Jones, Dr. J., ii 17, 19, 20 Jones, rev. W., i 18, 381 sirW., il79; ii 45,^1, ib. note, 239, 260, 261, 265 note, 266, ib. note, 207 note, 272, 273, ib. note, 274, 275, ib. note, 276, 277, 278 note, 284, 283 Wm., i 52, 84 --(F.R.S.), ii74 Johnson, Dr. S., ii 238 note, 239 note, 294,296 note, 297 note, 298, ib. note, 299, 307, 308, ib. note, 309, 364, 365, ib. note, 366, 367 note, 376 note, 387, ib. note, 396 note; iii 3 note, 14 note, 15 note, 20, 25, 28, 30 note, 39 note, 42, 49, 03 note, 71, 84 note, 85, 86, 89 note, 29S note, 297 note, 298 note, 299 note, 317 note H., ii 17 rev. Dr. S., ii 259; iii 218, ib. note, 219, 235 Jomelli, i 151 Jortin, Dr,J., ii 365 Juan, don, i 72 ; ii 31 Jukes, ii 144 Juncker, i 134, 324; iii 174 iii, 74 Junius, ii 300, ib. note Jurin, i 62 Jussieu, B. de, i 159, 175, 1S2 Justin, ii 237 Juvenal, ii 239 ; iii 20, 25, 28, 353 Kalm, prof., i 103, 183, ib. note; iii 276 note 2 D 2 INDEX OF NAMES. Kals, rev. J. G., ii 258 note Kames, lord, ii 185; iii 63 note Kang-Hi, ii 284 Kant, Im., ii 195, ib. note, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 Karamsin, iii 6, 7, 163 Karsten, i 200 Karstner, prof., 150; ii 1]5 Kastner, A. G., iii 19, 173, 177 KaufTmann, Ang., ii 135, ib. note Keefe, J. O', iii 46 Keill, Dr. J., i 238, ib. note ; ii 69 note, 74 Jas., i 265, 315 Keir, i 102, 103, 115, 117, 124 Keith, i 132 G.; iii 197, ib. note Kellgren, iii 6, 56 Kelly, Hugh, iii 46 Kempis, Thomas a, iii 193 note Kendal, i 83 ; ii 123 note Ken net, Dr., iii 196 note Kennicot, Dr. Ben., ii 252, ib. note, 253, ib. note, 254, ib. note, 255 note Kenrick, Dr. W., ii 305, 309 ; iii 76 Keogh, i 182 Kepler, i 69 ; il 68 ; iii 288 Ker, ii 120 Keralio, mile., ii 349 Kerguelen, ii 37, 42 Khailof, iii 163 Kheraskof, ii 322; iii 6, 12, 163 Kilgour, Rob., iii 334 Kinderslcy, N. E., ii 278 King, E., i 219 note Kinnersley, Ebe., i27 ; iii 215, 216 note Kinsley, Apollos, ii 219 Kipling, Dr. T., ii 118 Kippis, Dr. And., ii 362 Kirwan,R., i58, 103, 104, 115, 118, 124, 129, 194, ib. note, 199, 200, ib. note, 232, ib. note, 233, 234, 236, 238 note, 239 note, 241 note, 243, 249, ib. note, 251,254, 257, ib. note ; ii 95, 96 Kissam, Dr. R., ii 21 Klaproth, i 124, 126, 192, 199, 201, 256; ii 3; iii 174, 290 Kleeman, i 158 Klein, ii 363 J. T., i 144, 146, 156, 159 ; iii 173 Kleist, von, i 1 25 ; iii 4, 22, 30, 178 Klewberg, i 320 Klingenstierna, i 89 Klinger, iii 55, 176 Klopstock, ii 316; iii 4, 5, 10, 11 note, 22,36,55,71, 171, ib. note, 177, ib. note, 178 Klugel, i 89 Knaut, Christopher, i 1 66 ; iii 173 Kneeland, Sam., iii 91 Kneller, ii 128 Kniaeshnin, iii 163 Knight, Dr. G., i 37, 39, 896, 397 ; ii 83 R. P., ii 102 Knox, Dr. Vic, iii 1 X8 INDEX OF NAMES. Kocmpfer, i 182; ii 46, ib. note Kofitsky, iii 159 note Kolben, ii 4-7 Korf> baron, iii 158 Koselsky, iii 162 Koslof, iii 163 Kotelnikof, iii \62 Kotoftzof, iii 162 Kotzebue, iii 55, ib. note, 178 Krat25enstein, i 28 ; ii 6 Krebsius, ii 236 Kreig, Dav., i 182, ib. note Kniger, ii 216 Kuhn, Dr. Ad., ii 18; iii 237 Kunze, rev. Dr., ii 243 note, 258, ib. note, 259 note Kuster, ii 236, 252 note; iii 178 L. Ladd, Dr., iii 68 Lagerbring, ii 350 Lagerstroem, i 185 Lagny, ii 70, 74 Laidlie, Dr., iii 236 note Lalande, de, i 3 note, 77 note, 78, 79, ib. note, 80, 404, 405 ; ii 80 le Fran^ais, i 79 Lallemand, ii 236, 237 Lambe, i 134, 256 Lambert, i 39, ib. note, 50, 89, 120; ii 115; iii 173 Lambre, de, i 80, 83, 404 ; ii 79 note Lametherie, de, see Delame- therie. Lancey, .las. de, iii 218, ib. note Lancisiu"!, ii 258 Landen J., ii 71, 7S Langhorne, Dr. J., ii 239 Wm., ii 23d Langle, de, ii 38 Langles, ii 284 Lantier, ii 358 I^ptief, ii 29 Larcher, ii 240 Latham, i 152 Lathrop, Dr., iii 268 Latrobe, ii 57 note Latta, Jas., iii 215 note Lavater, rev.J. C, ii 159, 160; iii 171 Lavoisier, i 52, 103, 104, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 note. 111, 112 note, 118, 122, 123, 124. 1 33, 245, 248, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 295, 349, 418, 419, 421 ; iii 263, 290, 343 Lawrence, ii 134 Lawson, i 197 Dr. L, ii 56, ib. note Lax, i 89 Lazzarini, ii 314 Leak, Dr., i 365 Leber, i 27 I Ledyard, J., ii 49, ib. note Lee, Arthur, iii 248 miss, iii 46, 132 note Leeuwenhoeck, i 263, 309, 319, 320 Leiberkuhn, i 66 Leibnitz, i 19, 20, 169, 383; ii 68, 69 note, 73 note, 74, 185, ib. note, 188, 192, 205, 212 note, 214, 330; iii 155, 168, 173 Leigh, E., ii 255 Leisewitz, iii 55, 178 IXDEX OF NAMES. Lcland, ii 238 Lempriere, J., ii 238 W., ii 48 Lennox, Mrs. Char., iii 131 Lenoir, i 86 Alex., ii 142 note Lennep, J. D., ii 229, ib. note, 333 Lcontief, iii 164 Leopold, ii 320; iii 6 Lepechen, ii 53 ; iii 161 Leske, N. G., i 159, 200; iii 173 Leslie, Rob., ii 78 note Less, iii 172 Lesseps, ii 45 Lessing, G. E., ii 310, 389 note; iii 5, 55, 170, 171, ib. note 178 Lettsom, Dr., i 181, 367 Levesque, ii 240 mile., iii 34 Levita, Elias, ii 244 Levitsky, iii 163 Lewis, ii 62 Dr.W., i 197; ii 5 E., iii 28 N. G., ii 385 . XrV, ii 235; iii 100 XV, i 72 Lichtwehr, iii 178 Lidner, ii 320; iii 6 Lieutaud, i 274, 346, 368 ; ii 5 Lightfoot, i 181 Lind, Dr., i 33 J. H., i 352, 359, 363, 368; ii 33 Lining Dr. J., ii 16; iii 228, ib. note Linn, Dr., i 58, 252 Linn, J. Blair, iii 239 note, 268, 271 note Linnaeus, i 141, 143, 144, 145, 146, 152, 153, 154, ib. note, 155, ib. note, 156 note, 157 note, 158, 160, 161, 167, 169 note, 170, 171, ib. note, 172, 173, 174, 175/178, 179, ib. note, 182, 184, note, 185, 186 note, 189, 194, 198,350, 428; ii 3, 105, 123 note; iii 231 note, 232 note, 290 Linwood, miss, ii 139 Lisle, de, see Isle, de 1' Littlebury, ii 238 Livingston, P. V., iii 205 note Rob. R., ii 107, 123 note Dr.W., iii 235, ib. note, 247 Livy, ii 236, 239 ; iii 336, 343 Lobo, ii 48 Locke, J., i 11, 13 ; ii 166, ib. note, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 174, 175, 178, ib. note, 180, 183, 190, 192, 200, 214, 295, 330; iii 197, 208 note, 337, 339, 348 Loesner, ii 236 Logan, iii 21 Dr., ii 107 Jas., i 170 Aote, 406, 412, 415, 416 note; iii 198, ib. note, 268 Lomonozof, ii 321 ; iii 6, 157, ib. note, 158, 163 Long, ii 120 Dr., i 84 J., ii 57, 325 Longalius, ii 257 INDEX OF NAMES. I/Dnglnus, ii 236, 239 ; iii 343 XiOowenoern, i 89 Loskiel, G. H., ii 57 note LossiuSj ii 216 Ix)tharius, emp., iii 317 Loureiro, i 182 Low, X, iii 114 note Lowitz, prof., i 120, 121, 122 Lowth, bish., ii 24'6, ib. note, 256, 257 note, 306 ; iii 336 ' Loyart, ii 50 Lubbock, Dr., i 127 Luc, J. A. de, i 52, 58, 132, ib. note, 219, ib. note, 221, 222, 237, 24-4, ib. note, 245, 248, 251,252, 420; ii 205 Lucan, ii 237, 239, ib. note ; iii 13 Lucas, ii 49 Lucian, ii 236, 233 ; iii 343 Lucretius, i 6; ii 235 note, 237 Ludolf, Dr., i25; iii 173, 179 Ludwig, C. G., i 148, 174, ib, note, 197, 370; iii 173 LulolfF, i 235 Luther, iii 167 note Lye, ii 325 Lyonet, i 67, 157, 276 note Lysias, ii 236 Lyttleton, lord G., ii 347, 355 note, 374 note ; iii 35 M. Maas, prof., ii 202 Macartney, lord, ii 44 Macauley, Mrs,, see Graham, Mrs. C. M, Macbride, Dr. David, i 350, 363; ii 120 M'Clinch, ii 112 note M'CuUoch, i 37 ; ii 84 M'Dowell, J., iii 204 note, 34J Macfarquhar, Col., iii 112 M'Kean, gov. Jos., iii 269, 889 Mackenzie, ii 381 sir Alex., ii 57, ib. note Macklin, C, iii 46 Maclaurin, Col., i 48 ; ii 73, 74, 75 Maclean, Dr., iii 263 Maclurg, Dr., ii 24 Macpherson, Jas., iii 10, 62, 63, ib. note Macquart, i 197 Macquer, i 63, 101, 105, 109, 118, 123; ii 121; iii 115 Madan, M., ii 239 Madison, Dr., i 90, 251; iii 224, 246, 262, 270, 348 Maffei, ii 314; iii 53, ib. note Magaw, Sam., iii 215 note Magellan, J. H. de, i 85, 189 note ; *tii 329 Magnol, i 166, 182 Mahon, lord, i 3 1 Mailla, J. M. de, ii 284 Maillet, i 212, 213 Maimbray, i 26, 384; ii 96 Mairan, de, i 248, 249, 253 Makin, T., iii 193 Malebranche, ii 170, 171, 173, 176, 183, 185 note, 192 Malespina, don, ii 40, 59, 62 Malgyn, ii 29 Mallet, i 89 Dav., ii 325, 365 ; iii 15 note Malmesbury, lord, ii 331 note INDEX OF NAMES. Malo, don G., H 240; iii 13 Malone, E., ii IS* note; iii 49, 06 note, 67 note Malpighi, i l4eS, H7 note, 175, 263 Malthus, iii 148 note Manfredi, i 89; ii 73 Mannevillette, d'Apres de, i 418; ii 62 Manning, Dr., i 377 rev. Dr. Jas., iii 242, ib. note, 340 Mansfield, Jared, ii 81 note; iii 261 lord, i 403 Maratti, i 180 C, ii 123, 130 Marchand, capt^Steph., ii 41 Marchesi, ii 152; iii 53 Marck, la, i 175,182 Maresch, J. A., ii 151 Margraaf, i 122, 124, 126, 190, 191, 199, ib. note, 201; ii 143; iii 174 Marigni, abbe, ii 261 Marini, ii 313 Marion, ii 37, 51' Mariotte, i 120, 251 Mariti, abbe, ii 43 Marivaux, ii 378, ib. note; iii 52 Marmontel, ii 379 ; iii 52 Marsden, W., ii 46, 276, 323 Marshall, i 184; iii 264, 277 note capt., ii 39 W., ii 103 Marpurg, ii 148 Marsh, Eb.G., ii 257 note Marsigli, Lew., i 155 Martelli, P. J., rt 514; iii 52: Martens, iii 348 Marti, de, i 134, 421 Martin, B., i 67 ; iii 348 Martine, Dr. G., i 1 32 note Martini (musician), ii 151 (painter), ii 130 Martyn, J., ii 239 prof. T., i 172, 181 ; iii 115 Marum, Dr. van, i 34, 391^ 394 Mary, queen, iii 348 Mascagni, i 270, ib. not« Maschalof, iii 163 Masclef, ii 244, 249 Maseres, Era., ii 72, 74 Maskelyne, Dr., i 79, 82, 404; ii 84 Mason, C, i 80, 82 Dr., iii 236 note W., ii 365, 366 ; iii 16. 55, 42, ib. note, 66 note Massie, T., i 426 Masson, i 179 Matthasi, C. F., ii 231, 252 note; iii 178 Mather, Dr. Cotton, i 355 ; in 188, 189 note, 241 note, 317 note Mattaire, ii 236 Mauduit, i 160 Maupertuis, i 72 Maurice, rev. T., ii 278, 286 note, 288 ; iii 32 Mawe, T., iii 115 Maxcey, Dr., iii 344 Mayer, prof. Tob., i 73, 79, 80, 82, ib. note, 1 17, 249, 404, 405 ; ii 95 ; iii 173 INDEX OF NAIMES. Mayhew, Dr. Jon., iii 23+, ib. note Mayow, Dr., 1 93, 97, 103, 286, ib. note, 288 Mead, i 324 Meares, ii 29 note, 39 Mechain, i 78, ii 79 note Meckel, J. F., i 268, 271 ; iii 174. jon., i 272 Medici, Lorenzo de, ii 365 Mcdicus, i 179 Meiner?, prof., i 149 ; ii 350, 364; iii 169 Meissner, Dr. J. II., ii 254 Melanderhielm, i 89 Mellin, ii 202 Melmoth, W., ii 239, 298 Melville, i 62 Menander, iii 315 note Mendelssohn, Moses, ii 216 j iii 170 Mengs, ii 130 Men in, ii 29 Menzies, i 289 Menzini, Bencd., ii 313 Merian, M. S., i 156, ib. note, 184; iii 173 Merkenius, iii 74 Merrick, Jas., iii 21 Mesmer, i 40, ib. note; ii 14 Messier, i 78, 405 Metastatio, ii 149, 151, 314, 365 ; iii 36, ib. note, 47, 53 Metherie, de la, see Delame- therie. Meusel, iii 175 Meyer, i 105, 124, 135; iii 174 Michaelis, Dr. C. B., ii 250, 255,201; iii 179 Vol. III. Michaelis, J. II., ii 250, 255, 256, 261 ; iii 179 -, — . prof. J. D., ii 245, ib. note, 250, ib. note, 255, 261 ; iii 179 Michaux, A., i 180, 185,428 Michel, rev. Mr., i 396, 397 MIchcli, i 166, 179, 182 Michclotti, i 47 Mickle, W. J., iii 12, 13 note Middleton, ii 60 -, — : ii 96 capt., ii 31 ■■ Dr. Conyers, ii 298, 365 Peter, ii 19, 20 Mill, Dr. .]., ii 251, 252 note Miller, Dr., ii 25 Ph., i 170, 181 ; ii 102 note, 103, ib. note; iii 115 Mille-s, dean, iii 05 note Millot, C. F. X., ii 348, ib, note Milne, Rob,, i 221, ib. note, 222 Milton, ii 295, 367 note, 417; iii 1, 3, 8, 9, 10 note, 11 note, 29, 36, 70, 72, 170, 296 note, 297 note Minot, G, R., ii 354, ib, note judge, iii 105 note Minto, Dr. Walt., iii 262, ib. note Mirabaud, iii 144 Mirkhond, ii 208 Mitchel, i 39, 61, 382, 396, 397 Mitchell, Dr. J., i 147, 183, ib. note j ii 10, ib. note, 2E INDiiX OF NAMES. 58 ; iii 252, ib. note, 27(5 note Mitchell, J. S., i 423 Mitchill, Dr. S. L., iii 2(53, 231- . prof., i 128, 129, 130 note, 1(52 note, 202; ii 21, 25, 107, 403 Mitfor(3, W., ii 347 Moehring, P. H. G., i 153 note IMohreiiheim, iii 103 Moitt, la, ii 140 Moivre, de, ii 71 Moliere, ii 132 ; iii 52, 54 note Molini, don, ii 59 Molyneux, i 60 Monboddo, lord, ii 193, 194, 214, 230, ib. note, 329, ib. note, 334, 335, 342 note; iii 10 note Monet, ii 146 Monge, i 134, 194- Monis, Jud,, ii 259 Monnet, i 134, 197, 253 Monnier, le, i 72, 80, 86, 173, 405 Monro, 1st Dr. A., i 148,265, ib. note, 275, 306, 370 ; ii 10 2d Dr. A., i 148, I5C, 265 note, 271, 272, 275, 306 5d Dr. A., i 148, 265 note, 266, ib. note, 268,270, 272, 273, 283, 306, 371 Dr. Don., i 363 M.ons, van, i 117 Montague, lady M, W., i 354; ii 54 Montague, Mrs., iii 131 Mont ail sier, ii 235 !^Iontesquieu, iii 348 Montgolfier, J., i 54, 55 Steph., i 54, 55 Monti, iii 53 Monval, iii 52 Moor, Josh., iii 241 note Moore, ii 140 ii 239 capt., ii 31 Dr. Ben., iii 342 -^ J., ii 381, 382 E., iii 42 J., i 425 prof., iii 351 More, miss H.,, iii 43, 119, 124, 132, 139 note Moreri, iii II 0 Morgagni, i 273, 274 Morgan, Dr. J., ii 18; iii 236, 237 W., i 384 J ii 72 Morghen, ii 146 Moritz, iii 169 Morland, G., ii 135 Moro, abbe, i 210, 216 !Morone, ii 313 Morovief, ii 29 Morrell, ii 239 Morris, Ant., iii 108 C, i 425 Morse, Dr. Jed., ii 5S, 63, 336 Morton, Mrs., iii 68 .^- T., iii 46 ]Morveau, see Guyton-Morveau, Moschus, ii 239 Mosheim, ii 263 note, 354 n«t«; iii 167, 171 Moss, i 377 INDEX OF NAMES. Mott, iii 240 note Motte* de la, iii 34, 50, 52 Moultrie, Dr. J., iii 228, lU note Mouzon, ii 02 Mozart, ii 148, 151 Mudge, i 65, Gd Mueller, J. G., ii 349 ; iii 175 O. F., i 160, 161, 182, 276 note ; iii 173 Muhlenberg, Dr., i 184; iii 204, 276 note Muirison, Dr., ii 8 note Mulgravc, lord, i 243, 254 ; ii 34 MuUer, see Mueller. Muratori, ii 314 Munoz, ii 351 Munro, Dr., i 33 Muntz, ii 136 Murphy, Ar., ii 239 ; iii 43 Murray, Jos., iii 220, ib. note J. R., ii 127 note, 138 note, 140 note Lind., ii 306, ib. note ; iii 124 prof. J. A., i 159 ; ii 5, ib. note ; iii 174 sir Rob., ii 120 Musa?us, iii 176 Muschenbroeck, i 39, 244 ; iii 348 Miisgrave, S., ii 236 Mutis, don, i 185 N. Nalrnc, i 52 Napier, ii 68 Nares, ii 305 Naylcr, i 374 Keeker, de, i 179, ib. note Ncedhani, i 160 Nesbit, ii 145 Neumann, i 126, 190, 201 ; iii 174 NevodtsikofF, ii 30 Newcome, Dr., ii 257 note Newcomen, i 56, 400, 402 ; Ii 113 Newsham, ii 1 15 NcAvton, sir I., i 6, 1 1, 12, 15, 18, ib. note, 19, 20, 24, 41, 46, 43, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 69, ib. note, 72, 74, 93, 94, 118, 122, 131, 195, 316, 380, 382, 408; ii 68, 69 note, 70, 73, ib. note, 147, 180, 185, ib. note, 190, 192, 200, 406, 407 ; iii 132 note, 196 note, 197, 240 note Nicholai, ii 389 ; iii 176 Nicholas, Rob., iii 248 Nicholl, Dr., ii 21 NichoUs, Dr. Fra., i 274, 324, 325, ib, note Nicholson, W., i 34, 35 note, 134, 197, 390, 392, 395; iii 115 Nicolini, ii 152 Niebuhr, ii 44, 47, 262, 26S Nieuentyt, i 243 Nieuhoft^ ii 42 Nisbet, Dr. C, i 26 note ; iii 252, 345 Noble, ii 99 Noldechen, ii 100 Nollekens, J., ii 140 NoUet, abbe, i 24, 26, 28, 52, 384; ii 6, 96 Nooth, Dr., i 134 Norden, Fred., ii 47 Nordenflycht, mad. de, iii 6 2 E2 INDEX OF NAMES. NoiTis, il 171, 212 J., iii 198 North, Mrs., i 428 Northcote, ii ISt Nuck, i 2(34- O. Oddi, i 89 Oedcr, i 182 Ogden, Dr. Jac, ii 1 7 J., iii 220 note • Josiah, iii 220 note Ohssohn, d', ii 54 Gibers, Dr., i 89, .403 Olivet, ii 23ti Olivier, i 157, ib. note; ii 54 Ommagank, ii 135 Opie, ii 134 Orford, lord, ii 132 note, 383 note, 384 ; iii 43, ib. note, 66 note Oriani, i 80, 89 Orme, ii 277 Ormoy, d', i 30, 383, 334 ; ii 07 Orrery, C. earl of, i 84 note J. earl of, ii 239, 355 note Osbeck, i 185; ii 42 Osborn, Dr., i 377 Ossian, iii 10 note, 62, 63, ib. note Oswald, Dr., ii 183 note, 185, 195, 404 Otis, Jds., iii 247 Otway, T., iii 41, 59 Oudenorp, ii 237 Ouseley, sir W., ii 268, 278 Outhier, i 72 Ovid, ii 237,239; iii 159 note Owen, iii 112 Oxenstierna, count, iii 6 Ozeretzkofskv, iii 161 Page, i 90 ; iii 262 Pages, i 254 ; ii 37 PaikofT, ii 30 Pakhomof, iii 159 note Paley, Dr.W., 0 215 note; ill 337, 348 Pallas, f)rof., i 146, 148, 150, ib. note, 158, 159, 16J, 182, 198, 234, 236, 276 note; ii 43, 44,45,53, 324; iii 16 J, ib. note, 164 Paoletti, ii 313 Paolino, ii 273 Papin, i 400 Paracelsus, i 102, 105, 311 Parceval, de, i 89 Parker, Jas., iii 92 Parnell, Dr. T., iii 29 Parcieux, de, i 49, 50; ii 114 Parey, Amb., i 372 Park, Mungo, ii 50, ib. note Parkhurst, i 18," 381; ii 229, 245, 249, 250 Parkinson, ii 13 Parks, W., iii 224 Parkyns, ii 144 Parmenticr, i 178; ii 95, 96, 104 Parr, ii 237 note Parsons, Di'., ii 158 Paschall, I., iii 328 Pasquin, Ant., ii 134 note Paterson, ii 276 lieut. W., i 32 note, 389; ii 48 INDEX OF NAMES. f Patiin, 1 194 Patterson, prof., i 85, 90; iii 2ti2 Paulus, ii 2G1 ; iii 179 Pauw, iii 236, 282 Pavon, don, i 184 Payne, ii 60 Perron, A. du, ii 265, ib. note Perronet, i 49 Persius, ii ^37, 239 ; iii 28 Peter I of Russia, ii 28, 43, 52, 87, 321; iii 153, 154, 156 II of Russia, iii 157, 15S Pealc, C. W., i 152 note; ii Peters, judge, ii 107 123 Pearce, ii 236 Pearson, Dr., i 128, 256, 358, ib. note Pechlin, J. N., i 147 aote Peck, iii 264 Pecquet, i 263 Peithner, i 194 Pekin, iii 163 Pelletan, i 33 Pelletier, i 122 Pelloutier, ii 325 Pemberton, Ebe., iii 204 note, 267 Penn, Wm., iii 187, 197, 198 note, 231 note, 232 note ^ R., iii 213 T., iii 213 R., iii 214 note Petit, i 372 Petrarch, ii 365> 367 Petrie, Arth., iii 334 Petrof, iii 159 note, 165 Petronius Arbiter, ii 237 Peysonnel, i 159; ii 54 Pfaff, Dr., i 33, 391 Phpedrus, ii 237 Philips, Amb., iii 33 Phillip, gov., ii 39 note Phillips, hon. J., iii 242 note, 250, ib. note, 251 J., ii 88 note Sam., iii 250, ib. note. 251 — W., iii 250, ib. note, 251 Pennant, T., i 145, ib. note, Phipps, capt., see Mulgrave, 146 Penzel, ii 240 Pepys, W. H. junr., i 120 Percival, l)r., iii 124 Percy, Dr. T., ii 283 Pericles, ii 357 Perizonius, Jas., ii 33 1 Perkins, Dr., ii 14 Pernetty, ii 158 Pcrolle, prof., i 59 PtM-ouso, la, ii 29 note, 33, ib. note, 42 Perriere, i 366 lord. Phj^sick, Edm., iii 323 Piazzi, i 403 Piccini, ii 151 Pickbourn, Jas., i; 306 Pickering, i 58, 252 Pictet, i 118, 120, 121 Piens, Dr., Pierce, iii 188 note Pike, iii 336 Pindar, ii 236, 239 Peter, see V/olcot, Dr. Pingre, i 78, ib. note; ii 32 INDEX OF NAMES, Pinkerton, J., ii 39 note, 47 note Piron, iii 50 Pitcairn, Dr.> i 279, 3l5i 318 Pitlscus, li 237 Pitot, i 51 Pitt, (?hr., ii 239; iii- 13, 21 Place, de la, i 73, 75, 78, ib. note, 118, 133, 238 note, €0] ; ii 74. Platner, prof. J. Z., i 370 Plato, i 279; ii 156, 330, 334, 335^ 357 ; iii 159 note -i abp. of Moscow, iii 164 note Piatt, sir Hugh, ii 91 Plattner, prof. E., ii 202 Plautus, ii 240 Plaj^fair, prof. J., ii 276 Plenck, i .177, 271 Plenisner, ii 45 Pleschtscheyef, iii 162 Plej^el, ii 148, 151 Pliny, i 168, 237 the younger, ii 237, 239; iii 352 Pluche, i 235 Plumier, i 180, ib. note, 132, 184 Plutarch, ii 236, 239, 240 Pococke, Dr. R., ii 47, 242, 262 Poiret, ii 48 Poivre, Ic, ii 47 ' Poller, col., ii 275 note Polltian, ii 149 Polotsky, iii 157 note Pohvhclc, R., ii 239; iii 18, 130 note Polybius, ii 236, 259 Pond, ii 57 Pontedera, Julius, i 166, 177 Pope, Alex., ii 238, ib. note, 297, ib. note, 306, 3 '9, 374 note, 406 ; iii 2, ib. note, 3, ib. note, 10, 13, 14, ib. note, 20, 22, 23 note, 27, 28, 29, 33, 3S, 48, 70,71, 85, 170, 297 note Popotsky, iii 159 note Popowitsch, iii 169 Porporerti, ii 146 Porson, R., ii 236, 237 note Porta, Bapt., ii 160 Porterfield, i 62, 272, 324 Portlock, capt., ii 39 Post, Dr. Wright, ii 21 Postlethwaite, Mat., iii 115 Potemkin, prince, ii 241 ; ni 164 note Pott, Dr. J. H., i 126, 190, 191, 199, ib. note; iii 174 Pcrcival, i 371, 372, 373, 374 Potter, J., ii 239 Pound, Dr., i 83 Pratz, du, ii 56 Preston, W., iii 333 Prevost, i 40, 58, 251 Pxice, Dr. R., ii 72, 207 note, 212, ib. note, 213, ib note, 214 — ^ — T. D., i 425 Priestley, Dr., i 29, 31, 59, 60 note, 100, 102, 104, 106, 107, 115,116, 117, 118,121, 124, 125, 133, 178,251,288, 289,290, 291, 293, 382,384, .387, 418, 419, 421 ; ii 96, 97, 195, 206, 207, ib. note. LNDEX OF NAMES. 208, 209, 212, lb. note, 213 note, 306, 358, 359 note, 360, 369, Wa ; iii 263, 290, 333 Priiice, rev. Dr., i 52 Pringle, sir J., i 34-7, 352, 563 ; ii 103 Prokopovitch, Theophanes, ii 321 ; iii 156, ib. note, 157 Prony, ii 74 Propertius, ii 237 Prosper in, i 89 Proud, Hob., ii 353; ill 199 note Proust, i 124 Provoost, Sam., iii 220 note Prior, Mat., iii 28, 70 Ptolemy, ii 403 Puckeridge, ii 150 Pultene\-, i 169 note, 170 note, 173 note, 184 note, 186 note, 427 ; iii 233 note Purcell, ii 62 Pye, Dr. S., i 235, ib. note H.J„ ii 238, Pyrlaeus, ii 326 note Pythagoras, ii 156, 177 Q. Quincy, Josiah, iii 217, 250 note, 331 Quintilian, ii 237 Quiutius'Curtius, ii 237 R. Rabbus, Pet., iii 74 Rabener, G. W., iii 170, 177 Radcliffe, Mrs. E., ii 381, 382, 384; iii 132 Raiinonde, ii 151 Rameau, ii 147, ib. note, 148. 151 Ramler, iii 17 3 Ramsay, ii 134 Allan, iii 33, ib. note Dr. Dav., i 360 note, 376 note; ii 12 note, 15 note, 24, 99 note, 103 note, 352; iii 226 note Ramsden, i 86 Rapin, ii 301, 343, 344, ib^ note Raspe, R. E., i 197, 216, ib. note ; iii 174 Ray, i 143, 146, 163, 164, 165, 172, 210 Raynal, ii 101 note, 349, ib. note Reaumur, i 131, 132, 157, ib. note, 158, ib. note, 276 note, 300, 420 Reboul, i 421 Redi, i 143 Redwood, Abrah., iii 212 Reed, Jos., iii 220 note Rees, Dr., iii 111 Reeves, T., ii 137 Regnard, iii 52 Regnault, ii 131 Reisch,Dr., i 349; iii 174 Reichel, i 177 Reid, iii 75 , r. Dr. T., i 62; ii 74, 168 note, 175 note, 176 note, 178, ib. note, 179, ISO, ib. note, 182, ib. note, 183, ib. note, 184, ib. note, 185 ngte, 138 note, 195, 205, 214, 404, 106; iii 245, 348 Rcil, i 348; iii 174 INDEX OF NAMES. Reimarus, ii 236 H. S., ii 202 Reinhartl, iii 172 J. P., iii 175 Reinhold, prof. C. L., ii 202 Reischius, iii 109 Reiske, J. J., ii 236, 262; iii 178, 179 Reitzenstein, iii 55 Reitzius, ii 236 Relhan, i 181 Reland, Adr., ii 250, 26 1, 262 Remer, iii 175 Renaudot, ii 261, 269, 281 Rennel, major Jas., ii 44, 61, 277 Renovantz, iii 161 Ressons, i 41 -Rcycr, i 251 Reynolds, F., iii 46 sir Josh., ii 129, 130, 132 note, 133, 134, ib. note, 138 note, 300, 301, ib. note Riccard, ii 240 Riccoboni, mad., ii 379 Richardson, ii 120 J., ii268 T Jon., ii 128 ^ Sam., ii 374, ib, note, 375, 376, ib. note, 377, 382, 397 note Richelet, ii 311 Richter, ii 151 • ii389; iii 176 N.G,, iii 173 Ridgely, Dr. F., ii 23 Ridley, ii 251, 387 Ring, i 358 Rinman, i 198 ; iii 115 Rittenhouse, Dr. Dav., i 60; 85, ib. note; ii 69 note, 74, 123; iii 103, 240, ib. note, 261, 266, 328 Ritzema, Rud., iii 220 note Rivinus, i 163, 164, 166 Roan, iii 200 Robert, ii 61 Roberts, i 55 Robertson, Abram, ii 75 Archib., ii 144 note Dr. W., ii 44 note, 64 note, 271 note, 301, 345, ib. note, 346 ; iii 175 prof. J,, ii 245, ib. note, 249 Robins, Ben., i 42, 43, 35ft note ; ii 32 note Robson, i 181 Roche, de la, iii 75 Rochefort, ii 240 Rochette, ii 61 Rochon, ii 51 Rochow, iii 124 Rodgers, Dr., iii 236 note, 244 note .-- J. R. B., ii 21 Roederer, i 271 Rocmer, i 89 Roesel, i 154, 158,276 note; iii 173 Rogers, capt. Woodes, ii 30 -, Dr., iii 202 note Pat., i 425 Sam., iii 32 Roggewein, com., ii 31 Rohr, van, i 180 Roi, du, i 180 RoUin, ii 347, ib. note; iii US INDEX OF NAMES. Rolt, iii 115 Romain, i 55 note Romney, ii IS^ Romofsky, iii 158 Roque, le, ii 261 Rosa, Sal vator, ii 313 Roscelinus, ii 420 Roschlaub, i 348 ; iii 174 Roscoe, W., ii 365, ib. note Rosenhof, i 158 Rosenmuller, E. C, ii 262 Ross, Alex,, ii 263 Rossi, J. B. de, ii 251, 253, 254 note, 255 note Roubilliat, ii 140 Rouelle, i 123 Rouland, i 30, 383 Rousseau, J. B., iii 36 J. J., ii 31 1, 379, 380 note ; iii 117, 348 Roussier, ab., ii 148 Rowe, Nic, ii 239; iii 13, 14 note, 33, 41, ib. note, 48, 60 Rowley, i 84 note T., iii 64, 65, ib. note, 66, 67 Rowning, J., i52; iii 348 Roxburgh, i 182 Roy, gen. W., i 52 le, i 44, 83, 244, 384 ; ii 32 Royen, van, i 174 Rozier, abbe, i 383, 384; ii 97, 104 P. de, i 54, 55 note, 383 Ruaeus, ii 235 Rubens, ii 128 Rubinelli, ii 152 Ruckert, ii 96 Rudbec, i 263, 205 Vol. III. Ruddiman, ii 236 Ruhnkenius, D., ii 229, 232, ib. note, 236 ; iii 178 Ruiz, don, i 184 Rumford, count, i 43, ib. note, 53, 118, 119, ib. note, 120, 121, 398, 399; ii 98; iii 250 note, 292, 330, 331 Rumof:iky, iii 161, 162 Rumphius, i 182; ii 46 note Rush, Dr., i 85 note, 330 note, 347,362, ib. note, 365; ii 8, 16 note, 19, 24, 69 note, 99, 403; iii 237, 240 note, 251, 263, 265 Russell, i 52 Dr: Pat,, i 154, ib. note W., ii 347, 355 Rutherford, Dr., i 104, 132 Rutherforth, Dr. T., iii 348 Ruysch, i 264, 265, 273 Ryer, du, ii 263, 264 Ryland, ii 144, 146 Rysbrach, ii 140 S. Sabbatier, i 33, 271 Sack, iii 172 Sacy, de, ii 261 Sade, ab. de la, ii 367 Sagar, J. B., i 350; iii 174 Sage, i 105, 117, 124, 120, 195 Alain Rene le, ii 378, ib. note ; iii 50 St. Andre, i 264 St. Foix, iii 52 St. John, Dr., i 110 note, 134 St, Pierre, E. de, i 49,73 note; li 51, 33S> 2F INDEX OF NA]\TES. Salamon, ii 151 Sale, G„ ii 264 Sallo, Den. de, iii 74, lb. note Sallust, ii 233, 234, 237, 239, 240 ; iii 336, 343 Salmon, ii 60, ib. note, 63 Rob., ii 138 Salzmann, C. G., iii 124> Samoilovitch, iii 162 Sanadon, ii 240 Sanctorini, i 273 Sandby, ii 144 Sargent, iii 18 Sarragin, i 162, ib. note Sauer, Mart., ii 41 note Saurin, iii 50, 51 Saussure, de, sen., i 120, 125, 177, 231, ib. note, 237, 245, 246, 248, 252 ' jun., i 177, 198 Sauvages, F.B., i 28, 173, 175, 350 Sauveboeuf, ii 44 Savage, R., iii 31 Savary, capt., i 56, 396, 401 Jas., iii 115 . ■ mons., ii 47, 264 Scaliger, ii 366 note Scarpa, prof., i 27 1, 272 Schaddau, ii 140 SchsefTer, i 190 Schafer, i 158 Scheele, C. W., i 99, ib. note, 103, 104, 105, 107, 118, 120, 124,126,134, 191, 192, 199, 201,254,238,349,419,421 ; ii 3, 143 ; iii 290 Scheid, Ev., ii 229, 230 Scheuchzer, i 180, 235 ; ii 46 note Schiller, ii 316, 349, 350, 563 ; iii 55, ib. note, 175, 176,178 Schilter, ii 325; iii 168 Schlegel, J. E., iii 22,55, 167, 178 Schlepper, iii 163 Schluter, ii 240 Schmid, prof., C. C. E., ii 202 Schmidt, ii 349; iii 175 Schneider, i 154; iii 178 Schcepf, i 154, 163, 183, ib. note ; iii 276 note Schoonaik, iii 4 Schranck, i 159 F. von P., ii 363 Schreber, i 179, 180; iii 17S Schrevelius, ii 235 Schrceder (chem.), i 134 (dramat.) iii 55, 178 (orient.) i 1255; iii 179 Schroeter, J. J., i 73, ib. note ; iii 173 Schubert, i 80 Schubin, iii 163 Schultens, Alb., ii 229, 245, ib. note, 250, 261, ib. note, 262, 332 Schultz, Dr., i 181 Schumliansky, iii 162 Schutze, ii 240 Scopoli, i 156 Scott, ii 63 Scrofani, ii 54 Scudery, mad., ii 372 Scull, ii 62 Seabury, Dr. Sam., iii 235, ib. note, 268, 333, 334 Search, E., ii215 note Seba, Albt., i 141 Sedaine, iii 52 INDEX OF NAMES. Seguin, i 134,280, 421 ; ii 120, ib. note Seller, Dr. G. F., iii 172 Sejour, i 89 Selle, prof., ii 202 Senac, i 363 Seneca, ii 239 Senger, ii 123 note Sennebier, i 125,177,384,418; ii 94, 96 ii 363 Sergeant, J., iii 21-1 note Sergei, ii 140 Sestini, ii 54 Sevvall, Steph., ii 259 Seward, miss A., ii 389 ; iii 37, 39, 132 Shakspeare, ii 295; iii 8, 41, 44, 47, 48, 49, 57, 58, 67 note, 70, 71, 296 note Shaftesbury, ii 297 Sharp, Abr., ii 74, 80 S., i 370 T., ii 245, 256 Wm., ii 146 Shaw, Dr. T., ii 43. 47 W., ii 325 Sheldon, i 270 Shelvocke, ii 30 Shenstone,W., iii 38, 39, ib. note Shepherd, i 80 Sherard, Dr., iii 229 note Sheridan, Mrs., ii 389; iii 132 R. B., iii 45, 46 T., ii 305, 306, 309, 365 Sherlock, Dr. T., ii 298; iii 334 Sherwin, ji 80 Shippen, Dr.W,, ii 18, 19; iii 236 Shippen, E., iii 198, ib. note Shore, sir J., see Teignraouth, lord Short, i 65, 86 Shortland, capt., ii 39 Shuckburgh, sir G., i 52, 243 ; ii 7 8 note Sibthorp, Dr., i 185 Sicard, i 366 Siderofsky, iii 159 note Sidney, sir Phil., ii 294 Silius Italicus, ii 237 Simmons, Dr., i 270 Simon, ii 146 fath., ii 330 Simpson, T., i 44, 73 ; ii 72, 73, 74 Simson, i 324 Sol., ii 252 note Sinclair, sir J., ii 104,355, 356 Siretuschkin, iii 162 Sisson, i 86 Six, i 132 Skinner, J., iii 334 Skorodumof, iii 163 SkurahofF, ii 29 Sloane, sir Hans, i 150, 172, 182, 185, ib. note, 186 note; ii 7, 46 note ; iii 229 note Smart, Christopher, ii 239 Smeaton, J., i 37, 46, 50, 52, 252; ii 84, 89, 114 Smell ie. Dr., i 376, ib. note, 377. Smith, Dr., i 61, 62, 66 • — Ad., 11215; 111348 , Elihu H., ii 25, ib. note — Jas., ii 19, 20 — J. E., i 143 note, 2F2 INDEX OF NAJVIES. 168, 167 note, 175 note, 181, 182,427 Smith, Dr. Nath., ii 23 S. S., iii 2t7, 268, 345, 349 (engraver), ii 144 Josiah, iii 227, ib. note Mrs. Char., ii 381; iii 37, 124, 132 rev. Dr., i 147, 148 note ; iii 238, 240 W., iii 214-, ib. note, 236, 328 Mr., i 403 W.,ii 35 1,352; iii 225 S., ii 352 T., ii 135 W., ii 238, 239 — (of Connecticut), iii 205 note — . (of New York), ii 352 Pcartree, iii 205 note Smollet, Dr. Tob., ii 298, 344, ib. note, 345, 377, ib. note, 382 Smyth, capt., ii 31 Snakenburg, ii 237 Socrates, ii 156, ib. note, 357 Soemmering, i 148, 272, ib. note, iii 173 Solander, Dr., i 186; ii 33, 36 note Solokof, iii 161 Somerville, lotd, ii 105 W., iii 17 Sonnerat, ii 46, 284, 323 Sonnini, ii 47 Sophocles, ii 236, 239 Sotheby, Wm., iii 1 1 note, 32 ^ottzman, ii 61 Soulavie, ab., i 197,235 Southern, T., iii 44, 51 Southey, Rob., iii 9_, ib. note, 34 Sower, Christopher, iii 25S Sowerby, i 181 Spalding, Dr. Lyman, ii 23 J. J., iii 171 Spaletti, ii 236 Spallanzani, i 159, 160, 177, 198, 276, 300, ib. note, 302, SOS, 310 Spandonck, ii 135 Sparrmann, Dr., i 153, 186, 254; ii 48, ib. note Speechly, ii 102 Spencer, Edm., iii 70 Spielmann, ii 5 Spinoza, ii 207, 208 Spitzenbergen, ii 240 Sprat, bish., ii 295 Sprengel,M. C, iii 175 prof. K., ii 358 ; iii 173 Stade, von., iii 163 Stahl, G. E., i do, ib. note, 96, 97, 105, 108, 109, 113, 118, 316, 322, ib. note, 324, ib. note, 325, 326,327 ; ii 189; iii 174 •Stamitz, ii 151 Starke, iii 277 note Statius, iii 353 Staunton, sir G., ii 44, 284 Stavorinus ii 44, 46 Stedman, ii 59 Steele, sir R., i84; ii319; iii 44, ib. note, 60, 84, 196 not§ Steinbach, iii 168 Steno, i 263 INDEX OF NAMES. Stephenopoli, ii 5 1 Sterne, ii 382, ib. note, 363 note Steveas, Dr. E., i 303 Stevenson, iii 200 Stewart, Dr. INIath., ii 70 prof. Dug., ii 64 note, 180 note, 182 note, 184-, ib. note, 214, 345 note, 406; iii 19 note, 348, 354 Stiles, Dr. Ezra, iii 223 note, ■ 270, ib. note Stirling, ii 70, 74 lord, see Alexander, W. Stock, Chris., ii 251, 255 Stoevcr, i 170 note, 172 note, 184 note, 187 note Stolberg, iii 178 Stone, iii 188 Storch, H., iii 165 note Storck, i 368 ; iii 174 Storr, ii 251, 261 Btoughton, hon. W., iii 335 Strange, ii 146 Stralenberg, ii 43, 323 Street, Wm., i 203 note Strong, Dr., iii 268 Stuart, Gilb., ii 134, ib. note, 155, 347; iii 266 Stubbs, i 276 note . ii 135 Sturm, iii 172 Stuyvesant, gov., iii 216 note Sue, i 272 Suetonius, ii 237 Suhm, P. R, ii 350 Sulivan, R. J., i 205 note Sullivan, Jas., ii 58, 353 judge, iii 105 note , Sully, H.,i83 Sulzer, i 153 J. G., i 32 Sumorokof, ii 321 ; iii 6, 56, 163 Surville, ii 37 Sussmilch, J. P., ii 330 Suyef, iii 161, 162 Swab, van, i 191, 198 Swamnierdani, i 156, 263, 264- Swankhardt, i 384 Swartz, i 178, 182, 185 Swieten, van, i 352, 376 note; ii 15 note ; iii 174 Swift, Dr. Jon,, ii 296, ib. note, 297, 306, 365, 374 note, 386; iii 23 'note, 24, ib. note, 25 note, 170 Svvltiden, van, i 39, 132 note Sydenham, i 313, 318, 350, 351 Sylvius, i262, 313 Symmer, i 28, 385 Synimes, ii 45 Synd, lieut., ii 30 Syng, Phil., iii 215 T. Tacitus, ii 236, 239, 240,338; iii 132 note, 352 Tagliazucchi, ii 314' Tartini, ii 148 Tassle, Jas., ii 141 Tasso, ii 313; iii 12 Tate, Nahum, iii 21 Tat ham, i 181 Tavernier, ii 268 Taylor, Dr. Brooke, ii 70, 75, . 74, 80 J., ii 236 Teignmouth, lord, ii 267, 278 INDEX OF NAMES. Temple, sir W., ii 295 Tenevelli, ii 361- Teniiant, Dr., ii 9, 15 Smithson, i 122, 123; ii 96 W„ iii 199, 200 note, 202 note Tennent, Dr. J. V. B., ii 19, 20 Gilb., iii 267 note Terekhofsky, iii 162 Terence, ii 237, 239; iii 132 note, 336, 34-3 Ternay, de, iii 331 Tessier, abbe, i 121 ; ii 96, 104-, 105 Testa, prof., i 405 Testolini, ii 146 Tetens, ii 216 Thatcher, rev. Dr., iii 105 note, 223 note Thelford, ii 114 Thenard, i 34 Theobald, Lew., iii 48 Theocritus, ii 236, 239, 240; iii 34 Theophrastus, ii 157 Thomas, Dr., ii 8 note G., i 425 Isaiah, iii 259 Mrs., iii 132 note Thomasius, Chr., ii 315; iii 167 Thompson, Ben., sie count Rum- ford. Hedge, i 425 ■ Jas., iii 29, ib. note 30, ib. note, 35,42,71,72 Thomson, C, iii 269, 328 Dr. T., i 103, note. 106 note, 134, 201 note, 247 note, 288 note, 420, 422 Thomson, miss, ii 139 Thornhill, sir Jas., ii 123 Thornton, Bon., ii 240 — Dr., i 187, 350 Thouvenel, i 134 Threlkeld, i 182 Thucydides, ii 236, 238, 240, 357 note Thunberg, prof., i 178, 182, 185, 427; ii 46, 47,48,323 Thury de, see Cassini. TibuUus, ii 237, 239 Tichorsky, iii 162 Tickell, T., iii 84 Tiedemann, prof., ii 202 Tilas, i 234, 236 Tillet, i 177 ; ii 104 Tilloch, Alex., i 197 note, 395; ii 117,. 151 Tillotson, abp., ii 295 Tindal, Dr. Matt., ii 344 note Nic, ii 344, ib. nc^e Tissot, ii 13 Toaldo, i25I Tode, i 179 Toderini, ii 54 Tofino, ii 62 Tolstyke, ii 30 Tooke, ii 53 note, 54, 321 note; iii 154 note J. Home, ii 306, 334, ib. note, 335, 336, ib. not* Toplady, ii 215 Toren, i 186 Torild, iii 6 Tott, baron de, ii 54- Toup, ii 236 Tourbilly, ii 104. INDEX OF NAMES. Tournefort, i 164, 165, 166, 173 Tourreil, ii 240 Townshend, i 350 Townson, Dr. R., i 155, 197 Toze, iii 175 Trapp, i 170 note Trembly, i 159 Triesnecker, i 81 Trew, i 272 Trimmer, Mrs., iii 124, 132 note Troil, rev. Dr. von, ii 33 TromsdorfF, i 391 Troostwyck, van, i 124- Trotter, Dr., i 363 Troughton, i 86 Trumbull, J,, ii 130, ib. note, 131 note, 155; iii 28, 68, 243, 266 ■ Jon,, ii 130 note rev. Dr. Benjamin, ii 353 Tschirikow, capt., ii 28 Tschulkof, iii 163 Tucker, Abraham, ii 215, ib. note Tudor, judge, iii 104 Tull, Jethro, ii 93 Tumansky, iii 163 Turdot, ii 368 Turner, (geogr.) ii 57 • (paint.) ii 135 Sam., ii 45 Twining, ii 233 Tychsen, prof. O. G., ii 245, 256 note; iii 179 Tyrwhitt, iii 66 note Tytler, ii 239 U. Uhden, iii 163 Ulloa, don, i 72; ii 31, 40, 58 Ulrica Eleonora, queen o£ Swe- den, ii 319 Unzer, iii 171 Upton, ii 236 Urfe, d', ii 372 Uslar, von, ii 96, 97 Uz, iii 19, 177 V. Vagonof, iii 163 Vaillant, i 153, 160, 170, 17»; ii 48, ib. note Valckenaer, L. C, ii 229, ib. note, 232 note, 333 Valenciens, ii 135 Valentin i, i 276 note Valli, Euseb., i 33 Valsalva, i 273 Vanbrugh, sir J., iii 59 Vancouver, ii 29 note, 40 Vanderlyn, ii 155 note Vandermonde, ii 74 Vandyke, ii 128 Vanhall, ii 148 Vanier, i 366; iii lA Vardill, J., iii 334 Varrentrapp, iii 114 Vassant, ii 366 note Vater, i 273 prof. J. S., ii 25a Vattel, iii 348 Vaugel, i 189 Vauquelin, i 34, 10^,124, 126, 177, 192, 199,201 ; ii 3 Vega, ii 80 Venel, ii 5 INDEX OF NAMES. Verbergins, ii 236 Verey, i 148 Verheyen, i 286 Vernet, ii 135, Verney, du, i 276 note Vernon, W., i 182, ib. note Veron, iii 331 Verplanck, Sam., iii 220 note Vertot, de, ii 348, ib. note Vertunian, ii 366 note Vesalius, i 262 Vicq-d' Azy r, see Azyr Vidal, i 80 Vien, iii 163 "Vieussens, i 306 Villoison, ii 232, 233, ib. note Vince, i 89 Vincent, ii 131, 137 Vinci, L. da, i 261 Virgil, ii 236, 239, 240; iii 63, 159 note, 164 note, 339, 343 Vogel, R. A., i 350; ii 3; iii 174 Voigt, i 197 ; iii 174 Voigtel, T. G., iii 169 Volney, ii 44, 47 Volta, i 30, 33, ib. note, 35, 103, 134, 389, 390, 391, 392, 394, 395, 421 Voltaire, ii 311, 330, 341, 348, ib. note, 349, 351, 368, 378, 387; iii 7, ib. note, IS note, 24 note, 49, 53 note, 54 note, 61, 309 note Voss, J. H., ii 240, ib. note, 316; iii 13,30, 177 Vossius, iii 88 note Vulpius, ii 237 W. Wachter, ii 325; iii 168 Wagner, ii 349 Wahl, von, i 89 ; ii 261; iii 179 Waitz, i 25 • Wakefield, Gilb., ii 236, 237, ib. note; iii 13 note Mrs., iii 124, 132 Walch, iii 175 Walker, Dr., i 194 G., ii 75 Jas,, iii 305, 306, 309 .- J. C„ iii 52 note J. M., i 426 prof., i 177; ii 94, 102 R., i 120, 121 Waller, Edm., iii 3 Wallerius, i 105, 189, ib. note, 190 note, 191 note, 235; ii 96 Wallis, capt., ii 32 Dr. J., i 365 Walmsly, i 73 Wain, Nic, iii 198 Walpole, Horace, see Orford, lord sir Rob., ii 365 Walsh, i 389 Walter, J. G., i 272, 273 T., i 183, ib. note; iii 264, ib. note, 276 note Walters, Dr., ii 32 note Walton, bish., ii 244 Wangenheim, i 183, ib. note; iii 276 note Warburton, bish., iii 48 Ward, ii 358 Wargentin, i80, 83, 251 Warham, J., iii 188, ib. note INDEX OF NAMES. Waring, Ed., i 50, 5 1 note ; ii 73,74 Warner, R., ii 240 Warren, Dr. J., ii 22 Warton, Dr. Jos., ii 239 ; iii 35, 66 note, 67 note T., ii 358 Waterhouse, Dr. Benjamin, i 358 note, 429 ; ii 22 ; iii 264 Watson, bish., i 25, 27, 2S, 91, 134, 244 note, 254; ii 300, 301 Dr. R., ii 347 (optician), i 66 . (teacher of deaf and dumb), i 366 Watt, ii 5 1 Jas., i 57, 290, 401,402; ii 89, 113, ib. note, 120 Watts, Dr. Isaac, ii 213, ib. note; iii 21, 35, 336 Webster, N., i 362; ii 304, 306; iii 124, 253 ~ jun., iii 260 note Wedgewood, i 121, 124, 132; ii 122, 141 Weiglib, i 128 Weisse, iii 36, 55, 178 Weitbrecht, i 271; iii 174 Wells, ii 61 . Dr. W. C, i 62 Wenix, ii 135 Wenner, iii 114 Wenzel, i 135 Werner, Abr. G„ i 193, 194, 200, 236; ii 174 Wesseling, ii 236 West, Ben. (math.), iii 240, 261 Vol. IIL West, Ben. (paint.), ii 130, ib, note, 131 note, 134 note, 137 note, 138 note, 155; iii 266 Gilb., ii 239 Mrs., ii 389; iii 132 note Westall, ii 145 Westerhovius, ii 237 Westrumb, i 1 17, 257 Wetstein, ii 251, 252 note Wetzel, iii 55 Wharton, T., ii 236 Whately, T., i 374 Wheelock, Dr. Eleazar, iii 241, ib. note, 242, 339 J., iii 242 note, 339 Whiston, W., i 39, 206, 207 ; iii 196 note Whitaker, J., ii 346 note; iii 63 note Whitby, Dr., iii 230 note White, C, i 377 . Dr. Jos., ii 251, 261, 262, 263 Whitehurst, J., i 197, 218, ib. note, 219, 222; ii 77, 78 notp Whitelaw, ii 62 Whitney, iii 266 Whittem ore, Amos, ii 112; iii 266 Wm., ii 112 note Whit worth, ii 89 Whytt, Dr., i 282, 324, 368 Wieglib, ii 358 Wieland, ii 210, 316, 350, 389; iii 4, 5, 1 1, ib. note, 19, 36, 171, ib. note, 17Q, 111 2 Q INDEX OF NAMES. Wilcke, i 28 prof.i i 133 Wilde, ii 350 V/ildenow, iii 173 Wilford, col. Fr., ii 277 Wilkie, Dr. W., iii 9, ib. note Wilkins, bish., ii 304< C, ii 271 note, 272, 273 Wilkinson, Jas., ii 283 J., ii 114. WiW, ii 202; iii 118 note, 167 note Willard, i 90; iii 261, 336 Willemet, i 182 W^illiam, king, iii 348 Williams, col. Ephr., iii 337, :J38 David, iii 119 Eli&ha, iii 211, 223, ib. note J., i 223, ib. note, 224. miss H. M., ii 389; iii 132 note rev. Dr. Sam., i 162 note; ii 58, 353 Williamson, ii 62 ■ Dr. Hugh, iii 202 note, 215 note, 240, 262, 27 1 note Willich, Dr., i^40; ii 13, 195 note Willis, Dr., i 306, 329 Willoughby, i 143 Wilson, i 66, 121, 181 ii 135 capt., ii 39 prof. C, ii 245, 249, 250 Wilson, rev. Dr., ii 355 note Wilton, J., ii 140 Winckelmann, J., ii 359 Winckler, prof., i 25 ; iii 173 Winslow, prof., i 265, 270 Winterbotham, ii 5 1 Winthrop, i 89, 398; iii 105 note, 188, 224 note, 240, ib, note, 261 Wintle, Dr., ii 257 note Wintringham, i 368 Wirtz, i 5 1 Wisin, van, iii 163 Withering, Dr., i 67, 178, 181, 197; ii 3, 8 Witherspoon, Dr. J., ii 184 note ; iii 244, ib. note, 247 Witt, Sim. de, ii 62 note Woide, Dr. C. G., ii 118, 251 Wolcot, Dr., iii 27, ib. note, 188 Wolfe, Christ., i 20; ii74, 188, ib. note, 189, 195 note, 315, 366 note; iii 155, 167, 173 F. A., ii236; iii 178 Wollaston, Dr., i 3,90, 392-, 394. WoUstonecraft, M.,see Godvjrin, Mrs. Woltersdorff, i 197 ; iii 174' Woltman, iii 173 Woodhouse, Dr., i 181, 387, 418; iii 263 Woodhull, ii 239 Woodville, Dr., i 353 not^, 358 ; ii 3 Woodward, Dr. J., i 188, ib. note, 206; iii 196 note W. W., iii 20 note INDEX OF NAMES. Woollet, ii 146 Young, Dr. E., iii 20, ib. note, Worcester, marquis of, i 56, 24,42,70,71 400 Dr.T., i 58 Worthington, Dr.W., i 217 sir Wm., ii 50 note Wright, iii 304 note Z. Mrs., ii 140 Zach, Dr. von, i 79, 80, 405 ; Wrisberg, i 272 iii 173 Wurbierg, i 89 Zanotti, i 89 Wurm, i 89 Zaratusht, *ee Zoroaster. Wurz, iii 172 Zeder, i 159 Wyllys, iii 188 Zeiher, i 64 Zeisberger, ii 325, ib. note X. Zeno, Apostolo, ii 313 Xenophon, ii 236, 238, 240, the stoic, ii 420 366 note ; iii 336, 343 Zeunius, J. C, ii 236, 237 Zimmermann, Dr. J. G., iii Y. 171 Yaerig, iii 164 prof. E., i 146, Yale, gov. T., iii 196, ib. note, 148, 273, 284, 323 note ; iii 341 173 Yearsley, Mrs., ii 389 ; iii 132 Zinn, i 272, 284 note Zoega, i 180 Yekimof, iii 159 note ZoUikofer, G. J., iii 171 Yelaghen, iii 163 Zopyrus, ii 156 note Young, Ar., ii 103 " Zoroaster, ii 265, ib. note Printed by Ellerton & Bywortli, JoJjftiOn's Court, Fleet Stieet. y J iL