1869 THE LIBRARY Gift HA Title H-C Grant aka “fh ay gi Bee ve oh - ~- _ ewer z z X * san i. 5 aa ‘ ent -- Be . a Fd ~ » “ - - » 4 PaelisH ZOOPHYTES. ig i PLATE |. AP. del. L Reeve & Co London. Prats I. Diagrams illustrating structure of Hydroida. 1. Diagram of Hydra. 2. Diagram of Hydroid colony. 3, 4, 5. Thread-cells. 6. Medusa of Hydroid (after Hincks). 7, Diagram of planula. For explanations of these diagrams, see chapter on structure of the Hydroida, pp. 22—34. BRITISH = ZOOPHYTES: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HYDROIDA, ACTINOZOA, ann POLYZOA FOUND IN GREAT BRITAIN, IRELAND, AND THE CHANNEL ISLANDS. BY ARTHUR 5S. PENNINGTON, F.LS., F-R.M.S. The Zoophyte, The link that binds Prometheus to his rock, The living fibre to insensate matter.” Montgomery. LONDON: L. REEVE & CO., 5, HENRIETTA ST., COVENT GARDEN. 1885, TO CHARLES LOXTON JACKSON, F.L.S., F.Z.S. F.R.M.S., ETc., This Book IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED BY HIS FRIEND, THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. Tar object of this book is to furnish a handy and at the same time reliable manual of the British Zoophytes. I am aware that, in using the term “ Zoophytes” to cover so extensive a field as that comprised in this book, I lay myself open to some degree of criticism, as many writers confine the term to the Hydroida; but from a popular point of view the Polyzoa are as much plant-like in appearance as the Hydroids; and as the word “ Zoophytes ” has now no real scientific position, I feel justified in retaining it as a convenient expression, and in applying it in the manner defined in the intro- ductory chapter. My intention in issuing this work is to do for the present generation of students of natural history what the Rev. Dr. Landsborough did for a former in his “ Popular History ;” and, as modern science requires more attention tobe paid to minute and histological details than formerly, I have endeavoured not only to make the work a complete guide to all known British species, but also, so far as possible consistently with its character, to give an accurate résumé of the present knowledge of the microscopic structure of the various organisms described. I am necessarily indebted to the large and valuable works of the Rev. Mr. Hincks, Prof. Allman, Mr. Busk, the Rev. P. H. Gosse, and vi PREFACE. Dr. Andres, which, with many others. named in Appendix A., I have consulted and compared, and to which it is my hope that this book will act as an introduction. The various appendices and indexes have been care- fully prepared so as to afford all needful assistance, and all synonyms whose identity with present nomen- clature has been established have been included in the Index of Species. The Zoophytes have proved a most fertile ground for experimental classification, and the number of synonyms is consequently very large. The plates with which the book is illustrated have been drawn by my wife, for the most part from speci- mens in my own cabinet: and I take this opportunity of acknowledging my indebtedness to her for her assis- tance in my work. I trust that the objects I have before stated may be fulfilled, and that my efforts may prove of service, not only to students, but also to others in want of a guide to the wonders of the shore. ARTHUR S. PENNINGTON. HEATON, near Bouton, August, 1885. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION, AND History or ZOOPHYTOLOGY GENERAL CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION . DESCRIPTION OF StRucTURE OF HypDRoIDA CLASSIFICATION OF Hyprorpa. DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES OF Hyprorpa. DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OF ZOANTHARIA . CLASSIFICATION OF ZOANTHARIA DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES OF ZOANTHARIA . ° DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OF ALCYONARIA, AND CLassI- FICATION , F : : 5 : DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES OF ALCYONARIA DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OF PoLyzoa CLASSIFICATION OF PoLyzoa . DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES OF POLYZzOA COLLECTING AND PRESERVING ZOOPHYTES . EXPLANATION OF INITIALS USED ApprEnDIxX A. BIBLIOGRAPHY . - B. Gtossary anD GENERAL INDEX e C. InpeEx or Popuntar Namers InpDEx OF FamMI“IES, GENERA, AND SPECIES . ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. At p. 15, line 13, add “ and the European Zoantharia have been fully described and rearranged by Dr. Andres.” At p. 17, line 19, add “and by Dr. Andres.” At p. 135, line 12, for “ Otrcarris” read “ OLIGACTIS.” At p. 176, line 10, omit ‘‘ and the succeeding.” At p. 222, line 31, for “ Sertularia”’ read “ Scrupocellaria.” At p. 227, line 28, and p. 229, lines 24 and 25, for “ Monodox ” read ‘“ Monodon.” At p. 301, line 10, for “ Millipora”’ read “ Millepora.” DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. Praty 1, Diagrams illustrating structure of Hydroida. 1, Diagram of Hydra. 2. Diagram of Hydroid colony. 3, 4, 5. Thread-cells. . 6. Medusa of Hydroid (after Hincks). 7. Diagram of planula. For explanations of these diagrams, see chapter on structure of the Hydroida, pp. 22—34. mB oC DO He Prate II. . Clava multicornis, enlarged (after Hincks), p. 36. . Clava squamata, nat. size, p. 37. . Turris neglecta, enlarged, p. 39. . Cordylophora lacustris, hydranth enlarged. 4a, Nat. size, p. 40. . Podocoryne carnea, enlarged, p. 42. Prater III. . Lar Sabellarum, enlarged (after Gosse), p. 45. . Coryne pusilla, nat. size, p. 46. . Stauridium productum, enlarged (after Allman), p. 55. W CON & Ot So of O&O LP DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. . Myriothela Cocksii, nat. size (after Hincks), p. 58. . Kudendrium ramosum, nat. size, p. 60. . Garveia nutans, nat. size (after Allman), p. 67. r a : 5 . Tubularia larynx, nat. size, p. 73. . Tubularia Britannica, nat. size, p. 75. Pirate LY. . Corymorpha nutans, nat. size (after Allman), p. 77. . Clytia Johnstoni, enlarged, p. 79. . Obelia geniculata. 3a, Calycles enlarged, p. 81. . Obelia gelatinosa, nat. size, p. 82. . Campanularia flexuosa, nat. size, p. 87. . Campanularia angulata, nat. size. 6a, enlarged, De Or . Lafoéa dumosa, enlarged, p. 96. Prats V. . Calycella syringa, enlarged (after Hincks), p. 98. . Halecium halecinum, nat. size. 2a, Calycles en- larged, p. 102. . Sertularella polyzonias, nat. size. 3A, Calycles en- larged, p. 106. . Sertularella Gayi, nat. size. 4a, Calycles enlarged. py LOZ. Pratrze VI. . Sertularella rugosa on I’. foliacea, nat. size. Ia, Calycles and gonophores enlarged, p. 107. . Diphasia tamarisca, nat. size. 2a, Calycles and female capsule (after Hincks), p. 111. . Diphasia pinnata, nat. size, p. 111. Lo DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. x1 Pirate VII. . Sertularia pumila, nat. size. 14, Calycles and gono- phore enlarged, p. 112. . Sertularia argentea, nat. size. 24, Calycles enlarged, p. 115. . Sertularia operculata, nat. size. 34, Calycles en- larged, p. 118. Pratze VIII. . Sertularia argentella, nat. size. 1a, enlarged, p. LE. . Sertularia abietina, nat.size. 2a, Calycles enlarged, p. 115. . Hydrallmania falcata, nat. size. 84, Calycles en- larged, p. 118. Puate IX. . Thuiaria thuja, nat: size, p. 119. . Antennularia antennina, nat. size, p. 123. . Plumularia halecioides, nat. size, p. 127. . Plumularia setacea, nat. size. 4a, Calycles en- larged, p. 124. . Aglaophenia pluma, nat. size, p. 128. . Halicornaria pennatula, nat. size (after Hincks), p- 182. . Hydra viridis, enlarged, p. 135. PLaTEe X. . Aglaophenia plumosa, nat. size. 1a, Calycles en- larged, p. 129. . Corbula of A. pluma, see p. 128. xi DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. Prats XT. Diagrams illustrative of structure of Sea Anemones. 1. Section through Actinia (after Green). . Septum of S. parasitica (A. Rondeleti) (after Hert- wig). iw) 3. Diagram showing arrangement of septa in base of A, equina (mesembryanthemum), from Journal of Queckett Club, vol. v., plate xi. 4, Section through tentacle of Anemonia sulcata (A. cereus) (after Hertwig). 5, Thread-cells or nematocysts (after Hertwig). For descriptions of these figures, see chapter on Zoantharian Structure, pp. 136—145. Pirate XII. . Actinoloba, dianthus, p. 148. . Heliactis bellis, p. 149. . Heliactis venusta, p. 151. . Tentacle of Cylista undata, p. 155. m op DO Pirate XIII. 1. Adamsia Rondeletii, p. 158. 2. Cylista viduata, p. 156. 3. Aiptasia Couchii, p. 159. Pirate XIV. . Actinia equina (mesembryanthemum), p. 163. . Tealia crassicornis, p. 170. no DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. xiii 3. Siphonactinia (Peachia) hastata, p. 174. 4. Ilyanthus scotticus (after Forbes), p. 173. 5. Polythoa arenacea (Z. Couchii), after Couch, p. 182. 6. Caryophyllia Smithii (after Gosse), p. 184. Pratt XV. 1. Polyp of Alcyonium digitatum, enlarged, p. 195, 2. Section through polyp of A. digitatum (after Hert- wig), p. 191. 3. Pennatula phosphorea (after Milnes-Marshall), p. 1 C 4, Virgularia mirabilis (after Milnes-Marshall), p. 199. 5. Gorgonia verrucosa (after Couch), p. 196. Puate XVI. Diagrams descriptive of structure of Polyzoa. 1, Diagram of Polyzoa (after Busk). 2. Diagram of Bowerbankia (after Hincks). 3. Polyzoon with polypide retracted (after Hincks). 4, 5. Communication plates (after Hincks). 6, Alimentary canal of Cellepora (after Hincks). 7. “ Bird’s Head ”’ processes, p. 208. 8, Structure of Notamia bursaria (after Busk). For descriptions of these figures, see chapter on Structure of Polyzoa, pp. 201—210. Piare XVII. 1, Aitea anguina, nat. size. la, Enlarged, p. 212. 2. Kucratea chelata, enlarged, p. 215. 3. Gemellaria loricata, nat. size. 3a, Nnlarged, p. 217. XIV DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. or —_ Or Or ~~] . Menipea ternata, nat. size. 4a, Enlarged, p. 220. . Scrupocellaria reptans, nat. size. 5a, Enlarged, p. 223. . Bicellaria ciliata, nat. size. 6a, Enlarged (after Hincks), p. 226. Pratt XVIII. . Bugula avicularia, zocecia enlarged, p. 227. . Bugula turbinata, nat. size. 2a, Zocecia enlarged, p. 228. . Bugula flabellata, zocecia enlarged, p. 229. . Bugula plumosa, zocecia enlarged, p. 230. . Beania mirabilis, nat. size. 5A, Zocecia enlarged (after Landsborough), p. 232. . Cellaria fistulosa, nat. size. 6a, Zocecia enlarged, p: 234. Prate XIX, . Notamia bursaria, zocecia enlarged, p. 233. . Flustra foliacea, nat. size. 2a, Zocecia enlarged, p. 236. . Flustra papyracea, nat. size. 3a, Zocecia enlarged, p- 236. . Flustra Carbasea, zocecia enlarged, p. 238. . Membranipora membranacea, zocecia enlarged, p. 241. . Membranipora pilosa, zocecia enlarged, p. 240. . Idmonea serpens, p. 301. . Lichenopora hispida, nat. size. 8a, Zoarium en- larged, p. 305. cD oR OO De Nowe 2) DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. XV Prats XX. All the figures on this Plate are enlarged. . Membranipora Flemingi, p. 245. Membranipora lineata, p. 242. . Micropora coriacea, p. 24:7. . Cribrilina punctata, p. 249. . Cribrilina Gattyze (after Landsborough), p. 251. . Membraniporella nitida, p. 251. . Microporella cilata, p. 253. . Microporella impressa, p. 254. . Chorizopora Brongniartii, p. 256. Pirate XXI. All the figures on this Plate, except fig. 9, ave enlarged. oon nrnowrk w WY . Schizoporella unicornis, p. 259. - Schizoporella hyalina, p. 266. . Schizotheca fissa (after Hincks), p. 268. . Hippothoa divaricata, p. 269. . Rhyncopora bispinosa, p. 271. . Lepralia Pallasiana, p. 272. . Lepralia adpressa, p. 274. . Smittia trispinosa, p. 282. . Cellepora ramulosa, nat. size (after Dad). p. 291. Prate XXII. All these figures, except 4 and 8, are enlarged. . Mucronella coccinea, p. 286. . Mucronella variolosa, p. 285. XVi DESCRIPTION OF PLATES, oO Or & CO Inouwrwohvd & Co be . Lepralia foliacea, p. 278. . Retepora Beaniana, nat. size, p. 289. . Crisia cornuta, p. 294. . Crisia eburnia, p. 294. Pirate XXIII. . Alcyonidium parasiticum, nat. size, p. 310. . Flustrella hispida, enlarged, p. 311. . Vesicularia spinosa, nat. size. 3A, Enlarged, p. 315. . Amathia lendigera, nat. size. 4a, Enlarged, p. 314. . Bowerbankia imbricata, nat. size, p. 315. . Mimosella gracilis, nat. size, p. 323. . Pedicellina cernua, enlarged, p. 326. Puate XXIV. All the figures on this Plate are after Prof. Allman. . Cristatella mucedo, nat. size, p. 328. . Statoblast of C. mucedo. . Plumatella repens, nat. size. 3a, Polypide enlarged, p. 331. . Fredericella sultana, nat. size. 44, Polypide en- larged, p. 335. . Paludicella Ehrenbergii, nat. size, p. 324. . Lophophore of P. Ehrenbergii. NATURAL HISTORY OF feetse ZOOPHY TES. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY OF ZOOPHY TOLOGY: Tue study of the various classes of animals which are included in the somewhat paradoxical name of Zoophytes is one'which will always be attractive to the Naturalist, especially if the microscope form one of his ordinary instruments of observation. Widely sepa- rated from each other in structure as these classes are, they, nevertheless, are generally studied together; and, although the name Zoophyte has ceased to convey any special meaning, it is still used to denote all those animals, whether belonging to the hydrozoa, actinozoa, or polyzoa, which, judged by their appearance only, would often almost justify the application to them of the term in its literal sense. The animals, which have to be considered under this general term, vary in size as greatly as in structure; and, in giving descriptions of them, we find that they range from the beautifully B yw 2 NATURAL HISTORY OF conspicuous and attractive anemones to minute forms which are often quite invisible as individuals without the aid of the microscope. ‘The species found in our own country, unlike their relatives, the corals of tropical seas, are not important factors of islands or continents, but, from their extreme variety and beauty and from their curious life-histories, they are objects of interest to the scientific observer, no less than their — more useful congeners. The history of the investigations which have from time to time been made into the various classes of Zoophytes, forms a very interesting narrative, showing the strength of prejudice, even amongst scientific men, who, of all others, should be open to receive truth, however unexpected or unpalatable, and illustrating also the ultimate triumph of patient and careful observation. The study of Zoophytology, depending, as it does, so largely upon microscopical observations, has natu- rally been more active and accurate within the last century since the microscope began to be generally used. Prior to that time, it is not at all surprising that naturalists, whose observations must of necessity have been limited, considered Zoophytes as either vegetables or minerals. When the dendritic forms sometimes assumed by crystals are borne in mind, the idea that the more minute of the Zoophytes were mineral crystals does not seem so absurd as might at first appear; and the vegetable theory is not without grounds for justification, when the limited means of observation of its supporters are taken into account. There seems to be no doubt that until the year 1599 no naturalist had ever been rash enough or bold BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 3 enough to claim Animality for any of the Zoophytes, except the Anemones; and it would appear to be somewhat doubtful whether Ferrante Imperato, who in that year is said to have first promulgated the Animal theory, really fully understood the import of his communications. De Blainville, a great authority on the subject, considered Imperato’s ‘‘ Historia Natu- rale”” a very important contribution to the study of Zoophytes; but Lamouroux was of opinion that Imperato, in common with other observers, had no distinct notion of the animality of any Zoophytes, and certainly believed in the vegetable nature of almost all of them. However this may be, the publication of Imperato’s views had absolutely no effect in arresting the attention of naturalists; and the vegetable and mineral theories continued side by side for 150 years longer, until they were at length assailed by Peysonnel, then a physician in Marseilles, and afterwards physician to the king at Guadeloup, in a communication to the Academy of Sciences in Paris. The history of this communication is remarkable. About sixteen years before Peysonnel’s researches were made known, Count de Marsigli, an accomplished naturalist, had observed the polyps of corals and madrepores, and had published an account of his discoveries, in which he referred to these as flowers and blossoms. Reaumur states that “ this discovery of the flowers of the coral made a great noise in the world of naturalists ;’ and it will be easily seen that a misunderstanding as to the nature of the coral polyps, founded on the careful investigations of an observe of repute, increased the difficulties in the way or B 2 4 NATURAL HISTORY OF Peysonnel, and caused the Academy at Paris to turn not only a deaf but a disdainful ear to his communica- tion. Peysonnel appears to have been a very modest man, and withal afraid of the reception which his audacious views would meet. He therefore entrusted his notes to Reaumur, who, thinking his young friend very imprudent, and desiring to shield him from scorn and derision, read the paper to the Society, but kept back the author’s name, and himself not only spoke but wrote against the views of Peysonnel. He did, however, give the latter credit for not writing “entirely from fancy’?! Peysonnel’s document, if published at all, is not in existence, and the only record of it is in Reaumur’s essay, written against it, and read before the Academy under the title, ‘Observations upon the formation of Coral and other productions called Stony Plants.” In this manner, therefore, was the light rejected ; wud the subject was not again broached until 1741. In that year Abraham Trembley conducted a series of experiments upon the Hydra, or fresh-water polyp, with respect to its extraordinary recuperative powers, and also discovered Lophopus Crystallinus, one of the fresh-water polyzoa, which he called, “‘ Polype a@ panache.’ His experiments attracted considerable attention both in England and on the Continent. In England his researches upon the Hydra were repeated by Baker, who, in 1743, published an elaborate letter* * The title-page of this publication is curious. It is as follows: “An attempt towards a natural history of the Polype, in a letter to Martin Folkes, Esq., President of the Royal Society, describing their different species, the places where to seek and how to find them, their wonderful production and increase, the form, structure and use of their several parts, and the manner they catch their BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 9) to Martin Folkes, the President of the Royal Society, in which he entered into descriptions of his own experiments confirmatory of those of Trembley. Baker also discovered Lophopus Crystallinus in England. He named it the “ Bell-flower animal.” Leeuwenhoek had discovered the Hydra in 1703; but its remarkable properties were not found out until the experiments of Trembley. These experiments were communicated by him to Reaumur, who stated in the preface to the sixth volume of his “ Mémoires pour servir & |’ Histoire des Insectes,” that he had repeated the most important of Trembley’s experiments, and to his great amazement found every one to exactly answer the accounts given. These curious’ investiga- tions seem to have attracted the attention of meta- physicians as well as naturalists, for in 1752, Dr. Parsons, F'.R.S., found it necessary to publish some “philosophical observations, in which he answered some objections against the indivisibility of the sout, which had been inadvertently drawn from the late curious and useful experiments upon the Potyrus and other animals ;” which observations, that they might prey. With an account of their pisEases and curEs; of their amazing Repropuction after being cut in pieces (as first discovered by Mr. Trempiey at the Hacun;) of the best methods to perform that operation, and of the time requisite to perfect the several parts after being divided: and also full pirEcrions how to feed, clean, manage and preserve them in all seasons of the year; likewise a Course of real ExprrimEnts performed by cutting these creatures in every way that can be easily contrived: showing the daily progress of each part towards becoming a_ perfect Potyre. The whole explained everywhere by great numbers of proper figures, and intermixt throughout with a variety of OBsER- vations and Experiments by Henry Baker, F.R.S.” 1743. 6 NATURAL HISTORY OF have the seal of orthodoxy, he dedicated to the Bishop of London. . The experiments of Trembley, however, had a still further effect upon Reaumur than merely to stimulate his curiosity. They brought to his remembrance the probably forgotten paper of Peysonnel, and he began to think that there had been less of fancy in Peysonnel’s views than he had been willing to give him credit for. He at once arranged with his friends, Bernard Jussieu and Guettard, that they should go to the seashore, and actually investigate for themselves the facts of the case. They accordingly spent the autumns of 1741 and 1742 in making researches at different localities on the French coast; and so satisfied were they, as the result of their studies, that Peysonnel’s views were correct, that Jussieu presented a memoir in 1742 to the Academy, in which, with particular reference to Alcyo- nium digitatum, Tubularia indivisa, Flustra foliacea, and Oellepora pumicosa, he demonstrated that the marine productions examined by him, which had been ranked as plants, were really the work of a kind of sea insect. Reaumur himself, in his work already referred to, recounted the researches of his friends who, he said, had recognized that many species of these bodies which had the external appearance of very beautiful plants were only an assemblage of a prodigious number of cells of polyps. He therefore ably sup- ported the views of Jussieu and Guettard, and retracted all his former opposition to Peysonnel. The new truth did not, however, at once prevail. The opposition it had to encounter from those who held the old views was very fierce ; and we are not surprised to find that Peysonnel himself returned to the attack. In a com- BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 7 munication addressed this time to the Royal Society in England, he recapitulated his researches of the previous thirty years; but his views received no more. support in England than they had done in France. Strange to say, we find them opposed in quarters where we should least of all have expected opposition. Baker and Parsons were the two chief opponents of Peysonnel, both of whom, from their knowledge of the hydra and its structure and history, we should have expected, like Reaumur, to have adopted the new creed. Baker, however, was enamoured of what he called the “vegetative” or dendritic forms assumed by many salts on crystallization ; and he declined to believe that the stony corals and corallines were other than mineral productions; and as to the horny and pliant forms of zoophytes, these he considered as vegetable in nature. Dr. Parsons was quite unable to approve of Pey- sonnel’s views, which he attacked in the Royal Society in the June following the reading of Peysonnel’s paper. In his attack he declared his inability to conceive “that so fine an arrangement of parts, such regular ramifications, and such well-contrived organs to serve for vegetation, should be the operations of little, poor, jelly-like animals.”? He accordingly stoutly opposed their animality, and insisted that their pro- ductions were the work of “more sure vegetation which carries on the growth of the tallest and largest trees with the same natural ease and influence as the minutest plant.” Parsons had not learned the truth which scientific men now recognize, that the weak and little things of the earth are the most powerful factors of its structure and development, a lesson which zoophytology is 8 NATURAL HISTORY OF well fitted to teach. At last, however, the oppo- sition which would not succumb to the controversies of the learned doctors and masters of science, gave way before the calm investigations of a London merchant. The death-blow to the mineral and vegetable theories alike was struck by the hand of John Ellis, who devoted his leisure time to the study of natural objects. He seems to have lived in undisturbed serenity whilst the conflict of opinion was raging around; as in his book—the publication of which practically settled the question—he does not once allude to the controversy, or appear to be aware of it. ‘The causes which led to the publication of his epoch-making work were as simple and unlikely as could be conceived. Ellis had been in the habit for his own amusement of making pictures of sea-weeds, corallines, &c., in which the sea-weeds served for the groundwork and more prominent objects, and the zoophytes were inserted as trees and shrubs. He informs us, in the preface to his book, that his friend, Dr. Stephen Hales, was pleased to express great pleasure in viewing those landscapes, and desired him to make some for the Princess Dowager of Wales, and also requested him to collect all the varieties our sea-coasts afforded, which he did by the help of his friend, George Sheloocke, Esq., and some of his acquaintances in Ireland. In order to distin- guish the proper characters of the different species with greater accuracy, he found it necessary to examine them with the microscope ; by which he meant, not the elaborate instrument which modern observers use, but one more like a dissecting microscope, with simple lenses. He early found that the texture of BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 9 many forms was such as to indicate an animal rather than a vegetable nature. His views were afterwards considerably extended, and he began to suspect that the Zoophytes generally were animals. In. order to determine these suspicions he went in August, 1752, to Sheppey, in Kent, to examine what he called the branched corallines. From his investi- gations he was fully convinced that “those apparent plants were really ramified animals in their proper skins or cases not locomotive but fixed to shells of Oysters, Mussels, &c., and to Fucus’s.”’ In June, 1754, he again went to the seaside, this time to Brighthelmstone in Sussex. He presented an account of this journey to the Royal Society. His conclusions were that the Zoophytes generally were animal productions, and that the animals producing them were of similar nature to the Hydra, or fresh- water polyp. The final results of his studies were pre- sented in detail to the public, in 1755, in a beautifully illustrated book, called “‘ An Hssay towards a Natural History of the Corallines and other Marine Productions of the like kind commonly found on the coasts of Great Britain and Ireland.” ‘his work he dedicated to the Princess Dowager of Wales; and in it he gave a full account of all his discoveries, with descriptions of each species, and extremely accurate drawings. To most of the species he discovered he also gave popular names, which they retain to this day. The entire work is a marvel of scientific accuracy. In his introduction he alludes to a person whom he calls his friend, Dr. Buttner, of Berlin. This doctor, who was a professor at Gottingen, repayed Ellis’ friendship by boldly claiming Ellis’ discoveries as his own. That 10 NATURAL HISTORY OF this was an impudent and infamous attempt at fraud is undoubted. Ellis’ researches were fully appreciated in his own country, and, in 1767, the Royal Society presented him with the Copley Prize Medal for his papers on Natural History. In presenting this medal the President of the Society, Sir John Pringle, stated that, although Ellis had opened such a wonderful view _ of some of the most extraordinary productions of nature, and had pursued his discoveries with such sagacity and judgment that he might reasonably have expected many testimonies of his successful labours in natural history, yet that medal was delivered to him as an express testimony of their approbation of his excellent papers on the animal nature of the genus of Zoophytes called Corallina, and of the Actinia Sociata. Ellis contributed no less than twenty-six communi- cations to the Royal Society, exclusive of the work before referred to. He held the office of King’s Agent for the Province of West Florida, and Agent for the Island of Dominica. His extensive knowledge of Zoophytes, which was much increased by the facility with which he was enabled to obtain specimens from the countries named, brought him into communication with Linneus, the prince of naturalists, to whom he wrote several valuable letters, and from whom he received letters equally important. Linnzeus seems to have adopted Ellis’ views to some extent. The stony corals he had previously assigned to the animal king- dom, and a study of Ellis’ views caused him to assign the horny and flexible corallines also to that kingdom, although, in order to mark his opinion on the subject, he founded the order Zoophyta, which he defined as BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 11 “Plante vegetantes floribus animatis.” His view seems to have been that the stems and branches of the Corallines, &c., were vegetable in nature, but that the Polyps were animals, As Linnzus considered that animals were only distinct from vegetables in the possession of a sentient nervous system, with voluntary motion, he had little difficulty in believing that the polyps were animals, while the stems were vegetables, and yet that both were one organism. ‘The reason he gives for this view is curious. He believed that motion of some kind was enjoyed by all living beings. The plants on terra firma enjoy the motion of the air; but, as in the depths of the sea there is perfectly undisturbed quiet, the Creator had endowed the terminal portions of the Zoophytes with a nervous system and a power of motion, that they might by their own motions partake of that enjoyment, which the quiescent state of their watery abode could not supply. The view of Linnzeus was adopted by Dr. Job Baster, of Zurichsee in Zealand, who at first was vehemently opposed to Hllis’ views, as is not surprising, seeing that he did not know whatZoophytes were, and was arguing from studies of Conferve. When, however, he became better acquainted with the subject, he did not like to recede altogether from the position he had taken up, but adopted the classification and definition of Linneeus as a compromise. Dr. Pallas also published a history of Zoophytes,* * This work, called “ Elenchus Zoophytorum,” was published at the Hague in 1766, and is a most carefully and scientifically written embodiment of the current knowledge of the species and charac- teristics of the Zoophytes. 2 NATURAL HISTORY OF in which he adopted the views of Linneus; but Ellis steadily refused to modify his views, and held out to the last for the complete animality of all Zoophytes. It was the intention of Ellis to write an exhaustive history of the order, but ill-health prevented him, and he got no further than the production of the plates and a number of notes which he compiled with the aid of his friend, Dr. Solander, who after Ellis’ death. arranged them in form for publication. His intention was frustrated by his own death; but Sir Joseph Banks, the President of the Royal Society, desiring their publication, this was accomplished by Ellis’ daughter, Mrs. Watt. In this book the Actiniz are for the first time included amongst the Zoophytes, which term is therein employed in the sense in which it is now generally received, its use as a term of classification having entirely ceased. lls’ work was the only one which treated of British Zoophytes alone until the year 1828, although in the meantime many writers had dealt with the subject generally. In 1780, Otho Fabricius wrote his “ Fauna Green- landica.” In 1785, Cavolini published an interesting memoir upon marine polyps. In 1816 appeared the second volume of Lamarck’s “ Animaux sans Ver- tébres ;” and in the same year Lamouroux published his “ Histoire des Polypiers Coralligénes Flexibles.” Lamouroux’ work was translated into English in 1824, and was the first English work, subsequent to that of Ellis and Solander, dealing with the subject in its entirety. In 1817, Cuvier’s “ Régne Animal ” appeared. In 1828, Dr. John Fleming published a “ History of British Animals,” at the close of which BRITIGH ZOOPHYTES. is he gives a list and describes a number of British Zoophytes. About this time also, the first step was taken towards a proper separation of the different coustituents of the order Zoophyta, which resulted in the rejection of that name, and in the ultimate adoption of the present system of classification. The Actinize were never really included amongst the Zoophyta, and Cuvier had already separated the Alcyonian from the Sertularian polyps; but the distinctions between what are now known as the Polyzoa and the Hydroida were not recognized. These distinctions, however, as soon as perceived, were carefully examined and defined. In 1827, Grant, in a paper read before the Wernerian Society on the structure of Flustre, pointed out some differences between the polyps of the Flustre and the Sertularize, but he does not seem to have fully observed the intestinal system of the former. In the following years Messieurs Milne-Edwards and Audouin, in France, pursued the same line of investigation, and, independently of Grant, described the structure of the Flustre. Mr. J. V. Thompson, in Ireland, was at this time pursuing a careful course of study of the marine productions of the Irish coast, and in 1830 he published a complete description of the polyps of Bowerbankia, Valkeria cuscuta, and other forms. He named these polyps “‘ Polyzoa.” In 1834, Ehrenberg published a memoir on the Corals of the Red Sea, in which he divided the polyps into Anthozoa and Bryozoa, the latter term being synonymous with the term “ Polyzoa” of Thompson. The term Bryozoa had been previously used by Ehrenberg, in 1831, in a number of the “Symbol Physice ;” but the appli- cation of the term Polyzoa to the non-hydroid polyps 14 NATURAL HISTORY OF was certainly prior to that of the term Bryozoa. In England, accerdingly, the former term is used, whereas on the Continent Bryozoa is the usual appellation. In the meantime, the writers named, together with Sars, Lister, Lovén, Couch, Van Beneden, and others, had added to the number of the species and to the general knowledge of the subject ; and, in 1838, Dr. Geo. Johnston published a valuable treatise on the. British Zoophytes, which has been the most important work on the subject until the recent publications of the Rev. Thomas Hincks and Prof. Allman. Of Dr. Johnston’s work, which was illustrated by a number of beautiful plates drawn from nature by his accomplished wife, a second and much enlarged edition, in two volumes, was again issued in 1847, In 1852, the Rev. Dr. Landsborough published a very interesting and carefully written popular history of British Zoophytes, which, however, did not aim to supplant the treatise of Dr. Johnston. In 1856, Prof: Allman issued through the Ray Society a monograph of the fresh-water Polyzoa, which still continues the standard authority upon that branch of the subject. In 1864, the Rev. P. H. Gosse, whose attractive writings have thrown a halo of poetry around the sub- ject, published a history of the Sea Anemones or Zoan- tharia, which is a most valuable and complete work dealing with the whole of the British species. This book is illustrated by magnificently coloured plates of the species described. The anatomical and phy- siological structure of the Sea Anemones has been exhaustively studied by the Brothers Hertwig, who, in 1869, published a treatise thereon in Jena, and Prof.. Richard Hertwig has since written the section of the BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 15 “Ohallenger Reports” devoted to the Actiniaria. In the latter publication is contained a summary of his own and his brother’s researches. Mr. Busk has also published a Catalogue of the British Museum Collections of Polyzoa, which is illus- trated by accurate and beautiful plates of many of the species described. This catalogue is not confined to British species. In addition to the writers named, many others whose names and works are referred to in the Appendix, have contributed to our knowledge of the species of Zoophytes, and of their structure and life-history. The chief present authorities on the British Polyzoa and Hydroida are the valuable and exhaustive mono- graphs on those branches (published, the former in 1868, and the latter in 1880) by the Rev. Thomas Hincks, F.R.S., of Budleigh Salterton, Devon, and the monograph on the Tubularian Hydroids by Prof. Allman, published by the Ray Society.* These books, from the accuracy of the descriptions and the beauty and completeness of the illustrative plates, will long continue the text-books on the subjects with which they deal. This review of the history of our know- ledge of the Zoophytes is necessarily short; but, brief and incomplete as it is, enough has been said to show that this beautiful and important group of animals has long attracted the attention of the scientific world, and has been repeatedly and carefully studied. The labours of naturalists spent in unravelling the mysteries of Nature may often appear trifling and * Prof. Allman is engaged in investigating the Hydroida of the “ Challenger” Expedition, and his first communication on the Plumularide has just appeared.’ 1883. 16 NATURAL HISTORY OF unimportant, but by one who considers Nature’s workings as the manifestations of Divine energy, no such terms can be applied to these studies; and, even to those who think that they can dispense with a Creator, and who see in matter itself something which has existed from all eternity and is sufficiently potent to produce life and all its accompanying phenomena, the study of that matter in its living forms, even in| those of the lower organisms, cannot be otherwise than productive of good ; and to those who look for beauty merely, and who would find in Nature that perfection and symmetry which they fail to find in art, the study of these animals with their varied and often highly coloured forms, and with their richly chased cells and structures, must be gratifying and attractive. In “ Glaucus,”’ the late Canon Kingsley says, ‘‘ The research which has been bestowed upon these unnoticed atomies has well repaid itself; for from no branch of physical science has more been learned of the scientia scientiarum, the priceless art of learning. No branch of science has helped so much to sweep away that sensuous idolatry of mere size, which tempts man to admire and respect objects in proportion to the number of feet and inches which they occupy in space.” To the microscopist the Zoophytes present a field for study and observation of unlimited extent. So many questions of importance remain to be answered, so many life-histories to be worked out, that no one who enters upon this study can complain of dearth of material to work upon. On every sea-shore their beautiful skeletons may be picked up, and the living forms may be readily obtained by dredging; and when BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 17 we consider that each one “is a miracle passing thought with insoluble wonders of birth,’’ we are fain to re-echo the sentiment with which the old observer Fabricius closed his book—‘ Remota etiam Deum enunciant,” and to confess that, as has often been expressed,— “ Figured by hand divine there’s not a gem Wrought by man’s art to be compared with them.” GENERAL CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION. It would be useless, ina work of this kind, to present all the various systems of classification which, from time to time, have been proposed for the species here- after described. It will be sufficient to set out, with such explanatory notes as may be necessary, the classifications which appear to the author most success- fully to satisfy the requirements of the subject, and to define sufficiently the leading characteristics of the various species. The works of Mr. Hincks, Mr. Gosse, Prof. Hertwig, and Prof. Allman, alluded to in the introduction, contain systems of classification as com- plete as the present state of knowledge will permit. The general system of classification adopted is as follows :— To the sub-kingdom Ccelenterata (hollow-bodied animals) belong all those animals with more or less radiate structure, in which the alimentary canal freely communicates with the general or “ somatic” cavity. They are also furnished with tentacles armed with stinging cells or cnidw. This sub-kingdom is divided into two classes: I. The Hyprozoa, in which the wall of the digestive sac is not separated from that of the somatic Cc 18 NATURAL HISTORY OF cavity, and the reproductive organs are external; and II., the Actinozoa or AnTHozoA, in which the wall of the digestive sac is separated from that of the somatic cavity by an intervening space subdivided into chambers by a series of vertical partitions, on the faces of which the reproductive organs are developed. (Greene, “ Coelenterata.”’) The Hyprozoa are divided into three orders, viz. : I.,the Hyproma ; II., the SipHonopHora; and IIL., the DiscopHora or Lucernaripz. The first of these orders only will be dealt with in this book, and will be described more fully in the part specially devoted to it.* The Actinozoa or ANTHOZOA are divided into two orders, namely, the ZoanrHaria and the ALCYONARIA, the distinguishing characteristics of which will be afterwards described. The preceding groups are separated from the re- mainder of the animals usually included in the expression “* Zoophytes”’ by three sub-kingdoms, the Ecurno- DERMATA, the ArTIcULATA, and the VErmgs, the two latter of which are sometimes comprised in one sub- kingdom, called the AnNnuLOSA. The Potyzoa, as the remaining group of the Zoo- phytes is called, constitute a class of the sub-kingdom Mott.usca, which consist of soft-bodied, unsegmented animals, usually provided with an external skeleton, and having a nervous system in the form of one to three principal pairs of ganglia. The Potyzoa are * Those who wish to study the Siphonophora and Discophora are referred to Greene’s “ Manual of the Celenterata,” 1875; to Huxley’s “ Monograph of the Oceanic Hydrozoa,” Ray Society, 1859; Forbes’ “ Monograph of the British Naked-eyed Meduse,” Ray Society, 1848 ; and Haeckel’s “‘ System der Medusen,” 1879. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 19 considered to belong to this sub-kingdom from the fact of their possessing a distinct alimentary system, and more especially from the facts that their tentacles perform the functions of gills and are respiratory organs, and that they possess a nervous ganglion. The Potyzoa may be defined* as “ Acephalous Mollusca, with free oral tentacles serving as gills, and having the mouth and anus near together, separated or not by the tentacles. They are enclosed in a cell, and usually form colonies by continuous gemmation.”? Some naturalists assign the Potyzoa to a division of the Mottusca designated the Moutuscorpa, which includes the Poty- ZOA, TUNICATA or sea-squirts, and BracHiopopa. The Potyzoa are divided into two sub-classes ac- cording to the shape of the lophophore, the name given to the stage which supports the tentacles. The first sub-class is the Hotoprancui,, in which the lophophore is either circular or horseshoe-shaped, and the wreath of tentacles is unbroken. In the second sub-class, or PreroBRaNcHIA, the lophophore is continued on each side into a process upon which alone the tentacles are borne, which therefore are discontinuous. The HotoprancuiA contain two groups, namely, the Ecroprocta, in which the anal orifice is outside the lophophore, and the Enroprocta, in which both the anal and oral orifices are within the lophophore. ‘The’ Ecroprocta contain two orders, the PHYLACTOLEMATA and the Gymnotmmata. ‘The former of these orders includes most of the fresh-water PoLyzoa, and embraces those forms in which the lophophore is bilateral, and the mouth is furnished with an epistome or valve-like organ arching over it. * Hincks, British Marine Polyzoa, cxxxv. c 2 20 NATURAL HISTORY OF The order Gymnotmmata includes those forms in which the lophophore is orbicular or nearly so, and the epistome is wanting. This order includes all the marie forms and the fresh-water genus Paludicella. The group Enrorrocra contains the single order Perpt1- CELLINEA. The sub-class PreRoBRANCHIA contains the order Popostomata, with its single family Ruaspo- PLEURIDH. It will be well here to explain what is meant by the Bathymetric distribution of Zoophytes. Forbes has laid down certain zones of depth into which the sea. may be divided, so as to indicate the area of occurrence of organic life. It must, however, be premised that the statements as to occurrence in certain zones are only approximately true, as many species are found in more than one zone. The four zones into which the waters surrounding our coasts are divided are—the Littoral zone, which extends between the levels of the ebb and flood of ordinary tides ; the Laminarian zone, extending below the littoral zone to the area only uncovered at spring tides ; the Coralline zone, extend- ing from the laminarian zone to a depth of 50 fathoms; and the Deep-water zone, which underlies this to a depth of 100 fathoms. To these zones Prof. Allman adds the Surface zone, which comprises the area extending toa depth of two or three feet below the surface of the sea, where the medusze of the various Hydroids abound in countless myriads. The principal species of Zoophytes are distributed bathymetrically as follows :*— LirroraL ZONE. Clava squamata, C. multicornis, * Alder, Cat. of North. and Dur. Zoophytes. Allman, Gym, Hyd., 167. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. mad Coryne pusilla, Syncoryne eximia, Clavatella proli- fera, Tubularia larynx, Sertularia pumila, Plumularia echinulata, Campanularia flexuosa, C. integra, Clytia Johnstoni, Gonothyrea Loveni, Actinia mesembryanthe- mum, Sagartia troglodytes, Tealia crassicornis, Hucratea chelata, Cellepora Costazii, Umbonula verrucosa, Schizo- porella unicornis, S. spinifera, Cribrilina punetata, Microporella impressa, Membranipora pilosa, Flustrella hispida, Scrupocellaria reptans, S. scruposa, Bower- bankia imbricata, Valkeria uva, Pedicellina cernua. Lamrnartan zone. Twbularia indivisa, T. bellis, Coryne vaginata, Myriothela Cocksti, Sertularia oper- culata, Sertularella rugosa, Plumularia setacea, Aglao- phenia pluma, Obelia geniculata, Calycella syringa, C. Johnston, Schizoporella hyalina, Mucronella coccinea, Membranipora membranacea, M. pilosa, M. Flemingii, Bugula plumosa, L. turbinata, B. avicularia, B. flabellata, Flustra foliacea, F. securifrons, Alcyonidium gelatinosum, A. hirsutum, Crisia eburnia, C. denticu- lata. CoRALLINE ZONE. Corymorpha nutans, Hydractinia echinata, Hudendrium ramosum, E. rameum, Perigont- mus serpens, Tubularia gracilis, Haleciwm halecinum, H. muricatum, Sertularella polyzonias, Diphasia tama- risca, D. fallax, Sertularia abietina, S. argentea, S. jilicula, Thwiaria thuja, Hydrallmania falcata, Plumu- laria pinnata, P. Catharina, P. frutescens, Obelia longissima, Campanularia volubilis, C. verticillata, Lafoéa dumosa, Coppinia arcta, Antennularia antennina, Tealia crassicornis, Actinolobadianthus, Bolocera Tuedie, Pennatula phosphorea, Diastopora patina, Idmonea ser- pens, Cellepora pumicosa, Gemellaria loricata, Snuttia trispinosa, Membranipora unicornis, Bugula flabellata, 22 NATURAL HISTORY OF Flustra papyracea, Cellaria fistulosa, Aleyonidium para- siticum, A. mamillatum. Denp-warer zone. Tubularia simplex, T. attenuata, T. indivisa, Lafoéa fruticosa, Halecium muricatum, H. labrosum, Sertularella Gayi, S. tricuspidatum, Sertu- lavia abietina, S. fusca, Campanularia gracillima, Diphasia pinaster, Thuiaria thuja, T'. articulata, Lyto- carpus myriophyllum, Plumularia Catharina, Tealia. digitata, Diastopora obelia, Stomatopora major, Cellepora pumicosa, C.ramulosa, Palmicellaria Skenei, P.cribraria, Snuttia trispinosa, 8. reticulata, Schizoporella linearis, Menipea ternata, Mucronella Peachii, Bugula Murray- ana, fetepora Beaniana. HYDROZOA. I. Hyprorpa. Description of the Structure of the Hydroida. In order that a clear idea may be conveyed of the structure of the Hydroida, it will be well to describe fully that of the most easily accessible member of the order, the common fresh-water polyp or hydra; and from that description to trace the formation of the fixed forms, which may be looked upon as compound hydre. In Plate I. fig. 1, will be found a diagram of the structure of the hydra, from which it will be seen that the animal consists of a gelatinous body or sac, one end of which, called the prowimal end, is expanded into a disc or foot, whilst the other end or oral ex- tremity, called the distal end, is occupied by the mouth (m) and tentacles (¢). The form of the body of the BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 23 hydra is exceedingly mutable, the animal having the power of changing its shape in the most protcean manner. At one time it appears fully extended, long and thin; at another time it is rolled up lke a ball. The substance of which the body wall is composed is sarcode. This body wall consists of two layers, the ectoderm (ec) and the endoderm (en). ‘The ectoderm contains two kinds of cells, large conical ones with the broad end outwards, and smaller round cells between the tapering ends of the larger ones. Among the cells of the ectoderm are what are variously called urticating capsules, nematocysts, cnide, or thread cells. These cells are a peculiarity of the Ceelenterata. They are oval bags, each contaiming a thread or filament capable of being suddenly extended on the slightest pressure. Some of the cells contain a sheath provided with three recurved barbs, round which the thread is coiled: the barbs probably act as aspring. ‘These cells appear to secrete a poisonous fluid, which, from the fact that it deposits metallic silver from the nitrate of that metal, is believed to be formic acid. The threads on extrusion pierce the body of the object which the hydra wishes to secure as its prey, and convey into it the poison, to the effect of which it speedily succumbs. The threads assume varied forms in the different species of Coelenterata ; and even in the same species there is often great diversity. In Plate I. figs. 3, 4, 5, are shown diagrams of the thread cells with the threads at rest and exserted. Between the ectoderm and the endoderm is a layer of fibres which are prolongations of the larger ceils of the ectoderm, and appear to serve the purpose of muscles. Between the muscular layer and the endo- 24 NATURAL HISTORY OF derm is a distinct, delicate, structureless membrane called the “supporting lamella,” described by Mr. J.T. Parker in the Proc. Roy.Soc., 1880. The muscular layer, with its supporting membrane, is called “ the mesoderm.” It has been found that the thread cells are connected with the mesoderm by fibrils. These are considered by some observers as muscular, and by their contraction and extension supplying the neces- sary force for the ejection of the filaments.* Others, however, consider that they are only supporting fibres. The cells of the endoderm are arranged in a single laver, and are large and nucleated; the base is some- what flattened, but the free end is rounded and furnished with cilia, which are in constant motion, and serve to keep in circulation the fluids in the interior of the sac. Dr. A. Weismann? has pointed out that the circulation of the fluids is also aided by rhythmical contractions or pulsations of the body wall. This applies to hydroids generally. The endoderm cells in the hydra are also noticeable from the fact that in one species, H. viridis, they contain a green colouring matter which has been clearly ascertained to be chlorophyll. This fact has been rendered certain by spectrum analysis and other methods.t As chlorophyll has until recently been considered an exclusively vegetable product, many observers hold that the green colouring matter is caused by minute algze which have penetrated into the substance of the hydra. This view, however, does not accord with the results obtained by the majority of * See J. R. M. S., 1882, p. 200. + Zool. Anzeig. iv. (1881), 61—64. t Semper, “ Animal Life,” p. 83. BRNIISH ZOOPHYTES. 25 those who have investigated the subject, and we may conclude that chlorophyll is present in the protoplasm of Hydra viridis as an animal and not a vegetable product. The cells of both the ectoderm and endoderm are vacuolated. This causes the granular appearance seen under the microscope. The base of the hydra is extended into a disc, the cells of which are to be distinguished from the other ectodermal cells by their cylindrical form, the possession of a highly refractive fibrilla, and the presence of a similarly refractive mucous secretion by means of which the animal is capable of attaching itself temporarily to any object. Herr Korotneff * proposes to call these elements “ glandular muscular.” Some observers have described a narrow canal or passage leading through the disc from the body cavity for the passage of excrementitious matter, but the existence of this passage is denied by others and is very doubtful. At the opposite end of the body is the mouth or oral orifice (Plate I. fig. 1 m). In many of the hydroids this mouth is placed at the end of a pyramidal projection. Prof. Allman calls this projection or proboscis the hypostome: but, as this proboscis does not possess any special function, it can hardly be considered a separate organ. It appears to be amere modification of the shape of the distal end of the hydroid. The mouth opens directly into the body cavity (bc) or interior of the animal, which is hollow throughout. Around the mouth of the hydra are a row of tentacles, or prehensile organs, of great extensi- bility, which are furnished to their very extremity with thread cells. In the hydre proper, these tentacles are * Zool. Anzeig. ili. (1880), 454. + Greene, “ Manual of Coelenterata,” p. 22. 26 NATURAL HISTORY OF hollow, but in some other species the body cavity is obliterated, and they only show the ectodermal and endodermal layers before described. In many of the hydroids the tentacles are not arranged in a regular row round the mouth, but arise in one or more circles which sometimes spring from various parts of the body. The object of the tentacles is to seize the prey upon. which the hydra feeds, and to convey it to the mouth, but no farther.* The mouth is slowly stretched over the food until it is all received into the body cavity, where it is passed round and round until what is nutrient has been absorbed, after which the remainder is ejected through the oral orifice. It is strongly in- sisted by many observers that the endoderm cells have active amceboid movements, sending out pseudopodia during digestion to such an extent as to nearly or quite obliterate the digestive cavity. Mr. Parker, in the communication before referred to, considers that solid food particles actually pass into the cells, so that the hydra presents the characteristically protozoan mode of digestion. In one case he observed a diatom frus- tule embedded in the protoplasm of a cell. This intra- cellular digestion is regarded by Prof. Metschnikoff ¢ as the rule in most of the true Ccelenterata, having been observed in all the chief groups of that sub- kingdom. The hydre, unlike the rest of the hydroids, are capable of locomotion either by free swimming through the water, or by crawling with a looped motion like that of a caterpillar. * Mr. Hertwig, Quar. Journ. of Mic. Soc. xx. (1880), 243. + Zool. Anzeig. iii. (1880), 261. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 27 The ordinary method of reproduction in the hydra is by gemmation, or budding, a small bud appearing upon some part of the body and ultimately developing tentacles, and becoming exactly like its parent, upon which it drops off and commences a separate exist- ence. Occasionally, however, another bud grows from the former one before it drops off, and in this case three generations appear attached together. In the warm period towards the end of summer, reproduction takes place by means of ova. The ovary (ov) is situated on the exterior of the body, and contains the ova, which are fertilized from the sperm cells (tes), which are produced in the neighbourhood of the tentacles. Both elements are developed in the ecto- derm. Unlike other hydroids, the embryological pro- cess is abbreviated in the hydre, and they do not go through the planula stage, which will be described later. The hydra, in common with many other hydrozoa, possesses remarkable recuperative powers. In fact, injury seems to be rather beneficial than otherwise : cutting a hydra in two has no worse effect than that of causing two hydre to be produced. The experiments of Trembley, Baker, and others on this question were very minute. They appear to have mutilated the hydra in all possible ways, without exhausting its recuperative power; and these experi- ments have been recently repeated by Mr. Dunkerley, of Manchester, who has described (in the ‘ Micro- scopical News,” vol. iii. p. 272, October, 1883) several successful dissections which resulted in the production of perfect hydrz from the mutilated parts. The polypites or hydranths of the compound hydroids 28 NATURAL HISTORY OF resemble in structure the simple hydra. If we imagine the young hydra produced by budding from the body of a hydra to continue attached to the parent instead of dropping off, and the process to continue indefinitely, we obtain a good idea of the formation of a hydroid colony. It will be understood that in such a case the food taken in by any one hydra would serve for the general nourishment, and that really the colony would - be one animal with many mouths, its different parts being connected by extensions of the body wall. This structure will be more readily perceived by reference to Plate I. fig. 2. Most of the hydroida secrete chitinous coverings called polyparies or perisares, which protect the soft connecting tissue, and form receptacles in which the separate polypites are lodged. The connecting tissue is called the cenosare. It is hollow, and leads into the digestive or body cavity of each polypite. This coenosare contains the two layers of cell structure already described as forming the body wall of the hydra, and is, in fact, an extension of such walls between the several polypites. The ccenosare is attached to the polypary by processes which are in nearly constant movement. ‘This movement is slow and amoeboid, new processes of attachment being developed, and fine films of the ectoderm gradually growing larger and thicker, thus showing a close analogy with the pseudopodial processes, by means of which some rhizopods are attached to their shell.* In Plate I. fig. 2, the separate polypites with their respective ectoderm (ec) and endoderm (en) are seen to be lodged in openings in the polypary (d), which en- closes the coenosarc (c). The hollow (a) of the coenosare * Dr. A. Weismann, Zool. Anzeig, iv. (1880), 61—64, BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 29 is seen to form a source of communication between all the members of the colony. The receptacle, or part of the polypary in which the polypites of the sub-order TaecarHora are lodged, is called the hydrotheca or calycle. The whole company of polypites forming a hydroid colony is called the trophosome. A constant circulation of nutrient particles is kept up throughout the ccenosarc, by which means every portion of the colony is nourished, and, to aid in the circulation of these particles, the endoderm of the coenosarc is richly ciliated. The calycles of the various species of Thecaphora are often very beautiful structures, and serve very largely for identification. In some species they are open, but in others they are furnished with an operculum or hinged valve, which serves as a further protection for the polypites. This valve varies in shape, in some species it is simple and in one piece, while in others it is complex, the various parts converging to a point. The enlargement of a colony proceeds by gemmation from the ccenosarc. The plan of gemmation is very uniform, each species having its own characteristic mode of branching, and the buds being produced at such places on the coenosarc as best serve to preserve the typical form of the species. In addition to the ordinary polypites of the colony which may be called alimentary zooids, there are pro- duced at certain seasons of the year sexual zooids for the purpose of forming new colonies, and the phases of reproduction in the hydroida present some of the most curious life-histories known to science. The sexual zooids or gonozooids are produced in gonophores or reproductive buds which spring from 30 NATURAL HISTORY OF different parts of the colony. In the T'hecaphora they are always produced from the ccenosarc, and protected by a chitinous gonotheca or capsule. In the Athecata they are not protected, and arise from various portions, in some species of the ccenosarc, in others of the polypite. The gonophores consist of an outer covering or perigonium and the contained gonozooid. The gonozooids are either fixed or free. Those that are fixed discharge their contents, whether ova or sperm cells, on the spot. The free gonozooids, on the other hand, at a certain stage break out of the gonophore, and enter upon a separate existence as medusiform zooids (see Plate I. fig. 6). The form of this free gonozooid is that of an umbrella or swimming-bell (a), which by its constant systole and diastole floats about in the water. From the centre of the bell hangs a manubriwm (m), which is hollow and terminates in a mouth. At the end opposite to the mouth it joins four tubes (c) which extend to the margin of the umbrella, and there pour their contents into a small channel (7) which runs round the bell. The bell is partly closed at the bottom by a velum or veil, which is perforated in the centre (e) to admit of the passage of food to the mouth. The margin of the bell is furnished with tentacles, at the base of which are developed often eye-like spots (ocelli) which are believed to serve the purposes of vision, ‘They are, however, very rudimentary organs. The medusiform zooid is capable of reproducing its own form by gemmation, just as the ordinary hydra, but ultimately the elements of reproduction are developed in the neighbourhood of the manubrium. When these elements are ready for dispersion, the BRITISH ZOOPHYTES.: 31 zooid enters upon a state of quiescence, and dissolves away in the process of fulfilling its mission. The medusiform zooids were for a long time con- sidered as distinct animals, but the life-history of a number of species has been worked out by many careful observers. After the liberation of the ova and its fertilization, whether the liberation has been from a fixed or a free gonozooid, the usual process of segmentation commences which results in the development of a free ciliated larva, called by Dalyell a planula. This planula (Plate I. fig. 7) may be defined as aclosed ciliated hollow sac with double walls. After several days, during which it swims about freely, it drops its cilia and becomes extended at one end into a kind of base or disc, by which it attaches itself to some object. It now becomes covered with a chitinous layer within which, at the upper extremity, the tentacles are deve- loped. After a time this layer is ruptured and the tentacles liberated, a mouth also being now formed, and the typical form of the species is ultimately assumed. As before stated, in Hydra the planula stage is suppressed. This was also thought to be the case in Tubularia, but recent researches seem to show that this genus presents no diversity from the regular mode of development. The presence of a nervous system or sense organs in the Hydroida has been often sought for, and recently not without success. Prof. Allman, in the Annalsand Mag. of Nat. Hist. for November, 1874, and afterwards in the Proc. of the Royal Society for February 11, 1875, describes the structure of M. Phrygia (M. Cocksii), and states that between the ectoderm cells proper and 32 NATURAL HISTORY OF the muscular layer is a deeper zone of the ectoderm which may have nervous functions. This he calls the claviform tissue. The tentacles terminate in capitula in which this claviform tissue is represented by a rod- like tissue, ‘‘ forming a thick hemispherical cap over the muscular lamella and endoderm of the tentacle, and composed of exceedingly slender prisms closely applied, with their inner ends resting on the muscular - lamella, to which the prisms are perpendicular. Ex- tending ina radiating direction from the convex surface of the rod tissue towards the exterior of the tentacle, may be seen numerous fine filaments, each of which, making its way among the cells of the ectoderm, terminates in a very delicate transparent oviform sac, which carries a minute styliform process. Within this sac is an oviform capsule, with firm transparent walls, having immersed in its clear refringent interior a cylindrical cord wound upon itself in two or three coils, which cord may be forced out through the smaller end of the capsule.” Prof. Allman ‘is compelled to regard the whole system as an apparatus of sense, in which sight and touch show themselves in one of their earliest phylogenetic stages, m which they have not yet become fully differentiated from one another.” C, F. Jeikeli* also considers that he has discovered sense organs in the tentacles of Hudendriwm, confined to the ectoderm, which sense organs appeared to be continued, as a nervous system, into the ccenosare. The palpocils found on the false tentacles of the Pennariide, and on the tentacles of Clava, &c., appear also to have a sensory action. In addition to the alimentary polypites and repro- * Zool. Anzeig. v. (1881), 43, 44. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES, 30 ductive zooids, there are in the family Plumulariide, what have been called guard polyps or machopolyps. These are extensions of the coenosarc lodged in nemato- phores or sarcothece, which are tubular extensions of the polypary, or chambers of the walls of the calycles, and serve to guard the individual polypites in some way from injury, or to assist in the capture of food. They have been recently discussed by Dr. R. Von Lendenfold in the Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. for October, 1883; but were first described by Mr. Busk (Hunterian Lectures, 1857), and afterwards by Prof. Allman in the A. and M. of N. H., 1864, p. 208, and in his ‘ Gymnoblastic Hydroids,” and by Mr. Hincks, in his “ British Hydroid Zoophytes.”’ Dr. Metschnikoff (Q. J. M.S., xxiv. 91, 92) considers that “the chief function of these orders is prophylactic, and that they eat up the necrotic parts of the colony, and continually explore the organs in their vicinity in order to render harmless, by devouring them, any in- jurious bodies that may be present.” He shows that the contents of the sarcothece are capable of extending themselves into the neighbouring calycles, and by a process of intra-cellular digestion absorbing any dead hydranths that may be there. ' It only now remains to notice the quality of phospho- rescence possessed by many of the Hydroida, both in their complete and in their medusoid states. The immense numbers of fixed and free zooids which are contained in the neighbourhood of our shores, are amply sufficient to account for the phosphorescent appearance of the sea:— “ Soft, brilliant, tender, through the wave they flow, And make the moonbeams brighten where they glow.” Mr. Gosse describes the beauty of this phospho- D 34 NATURAL HISTORY OF rescence very graphically in his ‘‘ Devonshire Coast.” He states that going into his study after dark, he took a stick, and felt at random about the water in which his captive hydroids were confined. Presently he touched something soft, and instantly a circle of bright little lamps was lighted up like a coronet of sparkling diamonds, or like the circular figure of gas jets lighted at a public illumination. He states in another place, that the luminosity of a species of Medusa observed by him, reminded him of the ring of glory in the pictures of the Italian School round the heads of saints, It would appear that the sub-order Athecata does not include any phosphorescent species.* There can be no doubt that much of the apparent phosphorescence is due to the presence of infusoria and other organisms which shelter among the calycles and upon the stems of the hydroida, as on several occasions I have found dis- plays of this quality, which have apparently proceeded from the Zoophytes, to be due to other organisms. CLASSIFICATION OF HYDROIDA. The order Hydroida contains all the forms which have been assigned by Huxley, Greene, and others to the sub-orders Hydride, Corynide, and Sertularide. The order, as so extended, contains all those Hydrozoa whose hydrosoma or trophosome is either free and consists of a single locomotive polyp, or is fixed and — consists of one polyp or of several connected by a coenosarc, with or without hydrothece, and often developing a polypary or firm outer layer. The re- productive organs appear either as, in the Hydra, simple processes from the body walls, or as gonophores. * Allman, “ Gymnoblastic Hydroids,” 146. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 30D The Hydroida have been divided by Mr. Hincks into three sub-orders: 1. The Arnecata; 2, the THEcAPHORA, and 3, the GymnocHroa. These sub- orders exactly correspond with those established by Prof. Allman, and which he names (ymnoblastea, Calyptoblastea, and Hleutheroblastea. The sub-order Aturcata, or Gymnoblastea, contains those genera in which the polyps and gonophores are not lodged in external protective receptacles, that is, are not protected by hydrothecze or gonothece. This sub-order contains the families Clavide, Hydractiniide, Podocorynide, Hydrolaride, Corynide, Pennariide, Clavatellide, Myriothellide, Hudendriide, Bimeride, and Tubularide. ‘The characteristics of these families are based upon the shape of the hydranths or poly- pites, and the disposition of the tentacles. Prof. Allman introduces the method of reproduction into his family characteristics, but I have thought it advisable so far as possible to retam Mr. Hincks’ divisions as having characters more easily perceptible to a student. I have introduced into the text or foot- notes references to Prof. Allman’s families and genera wherever they differ from those of Mr. Hincks. In the sub-order THrcarnora, or Calyptoblastea, the zooids are protected by thece. ‘This order contains the Campanulariide, Campanulinide, Leptoscyphide, Lafoéide, Trichydride, Coppiniide, Halectide, Sertu- lariide, and Plumulariide. The sub-order Gymnocuroa, or Lleutheroblastea, contains the single family Hydrid@, in which the polyp is destitute of a polypary and is locomotive. This family comprises one genus hydra. The only fresh-water hydroids are Cordylophora lacustris and the various species of Hydree. pb 2 36 NATURAL HISTORY OF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE VARIOUS BRITISH HYDROIDA. Sus-Orper: ATHECATA, Hincks. (GymnosiastEa, Allman.) FAMILY I. CLAVIDA. Polypites claviform or fusiform, with scattered filiform tentacula.—T. H. _ Prof. Allman excludes the genus Turris from this order, and establishes for it the order Turride, in which the reproduction is by medusiform gonozooids. In the Clavide (Allman), which includes the remaining genera, Clava, Cordylophora, and Tubiclava, the repro- duction is by fixed sporosacs. The diagnosis above given is sufficiently wide to include Twrris. Gunus I. Crava, Gmelin. (Clava, a club.) Polypites clavate, contractile, rising from a filiform stolon with a chitinous polypary also investing the base of the polypites. Tentacles scattered, smooth, nume- rous. Jteproduction by fixed sporosacs borne singly or in clusters behind the posterior tentacles.—T. H. 1. C. mutricornis, Yorskal. Plate II. fig. 1. Tubularia affinis (T'urt.), Hydra multicornis (forsk.), Coryne squamata (f.Q.0C., V.B., Fl.), Clava repens (T. S. W.), Clava discreta (All.), Coryne multicornis (Lk., Tem,., G. J.) Hab.: Not uncommon between tide marks. Height, BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. ou tin. Polypites rose or flesh-coloured, with the oral extremity white. Tentacles 830—40. Head and ten- tacles very motile. At the extremities of the latter are minute hairs serving as tactile organs called palpocils. 2. C. squamata, Miiller. Plate IL. fig. 2. Hydra squamata (Mil, Fabr.), Coryne squamata (Lk.), Coryne multicornis (Hhr.), Clava membranacea (7. S. W., McA.), Clava cornea (T. S. W., T. H.). Hab.: On Fucus vesiculosus ; generally distributed. Height, 3—1 in. Forms densely clustered colonies encrusting the fronds of the Fucus. Polypites yellowish- red, tall, expanding upwards, dicecious. Tentacles white, 6—20. Gonophores hanging round the body like a collar. Dr. T. S. Wright (Edin. N. P. Journal, July, 1857), describes a smaller variety of this species under the name OC. cornea. 3. C. LEPTOSTYLA, Agassiz. Hab.: Morecambe Bay (Ff. H. West). Polypites forming red moss-like bunches, very tall and graceful, with not less than 35 tentacles. For about 4, in. above the point of origin of the polypite it is much attenuated, and above this it increases very largely in diameter. This species has only been found once in England. 4, C. noposa, T. S. W. Hab.: On fronds of Delesseria sanguinea at Queens- ferry and Largo, at low-tide mark (T. S. W.). Polypite single, small, aurora-coloured, springing from a knot of convoluted tubes. Described in Hdin. N. P. Journ. (N.S.) xvi. 154. 5. C. pirrusa, All. Hab.: Shetland Is. (All.). Height }—in. Poly- 38 NATURAL HISTORY OF pites light rose-colour. Tentacles 20. A doubtful species, probably a variety of C. multicornis. Prof. Allman found it in rock-pools at low water in the Shetland Isles. It is described and figured by him (G. H. 247, Plate IT. 3, 4). He considers it a separate species on account of the scattered condition of its gonophores. Genus II. Tustctava, Allman. (Tubus, a tube.) Polypites claviform, elevated on distinct stems arising from a creeping stolon, the whole clothed with a polypary. Gonophores borne on body of polypites behind posterior tentacles, or on the summit of very short stems (Blastostyles, Allman) developed from the stulon (7. H.). This diagnosis includes the species 7’. cornucopie, for which Prof. Allman establishes the genus Merona, based on the possession by that species of blastostyles (G.., Hi. 297): 1. T. Lucerna, All, Hab.: On loose stones, Torquay, Dublin Bay (All.). Height ¢in. Polypites very minute, polypary yellowish- brown; polypites white, with pale ochreous centre. 2. T. rruticosa, All. Hab.: Tenby (All.). Height 4—5 lines. Stem branched. Polypary smooth, straw-coloured. Polypites vermilion. Tentacles 14—18. 3. T. cornucoriz, A. M. N. Merona cornucopie (A. M. N., All.). Height } in. Stem consisting of trumpet-shaped tubes. Polypites with elongate claviform heads. Gonophores borne on short stems or atrophied polypites (blastostyles). Mr. Norman and Prof. Allman refer this species to a genus Merona, based upon the last-named characteristic. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 39 Mr. Norman remarks that “in every instance the Zoophyte was found at the posterior portion of shells occupied by living mollusca, where it received the benefit of the aqueous currents caused by the mollusc, which unwittingly performed the kindly office of feeding its hungry neighbour.” Hab.: Shetland (A. MV. N., C. W. P.). Genus III. Turris, Lesson. (Turris, a tower.) Stems short, rooted by a filiform stolon, bearing the polypites on their summits. Ccnosare invested by a polypary. Polypites claviform, with scattered filiform tentacles. G'onozooids free and medusiform.—T. H. The polypites of this genus differ from those of the other genera of the Clavide in producing medusiform gonozooids. On this account Prof. Allman (G. H. 259) refers the genus to the family Twrride, which he has established for it. 1. T. neaurcta, Les. Plate II. fig. 3. Cyanza coccinea (Davis), Clavula Gossii (T. 8. W.). Hab.: Isle of Wight, Portland (Forbes), Tenby (Davis), Ilfracombe (P. H. G.), Queensferry (7. S. W.). Height 54, in. Polypites crimson, borne on short stalks. Tentacles 12, the upper row of 4 long and erect, the rest scattered, shorter, and bent upwards. The gonozooid of this species was for a long time considered as a separate animal, and was called the “ruby medusa.” Mr. Gosse, in his ‘ Devonshire Coast,” describes the medusz as resembling beads of coral when brought up on the muslin of the net. The manubrium is large and of a dull crimson colour. The ovaries become orange-coloured, and the ova enclosed of a rich purple hue. Mr. Gosse was fortunate in 4.0- NATURAL HISTORY OF seeing the Turris in a state of ovipositing, and he observed frequently the escape of the embryos, but was not successful in rearing them to maturity. Dr. T. S. Wright, however, was subsequently able to keep the embryos until they became perfect hydroids. Genus IV. Corpytoppora, Adi. (xopdvdn, a club, gopéw, I bear.) Stem well developed, branching. Ccnosare entirely invested by the polypary. Polypites fusiform, at ex- tremities of the branches with scattered filiform tenta- cula. teproduction by fixed sporosacs borne on the stem.—T. H. 1. C. uacustris, Allman. Plate II. fig. 4. Syncoryne lacustris (Ag.). Hab,: Grand Canal Docks, Dublin (All.) ; Commer- cial and West India Docks, London (Dr. Bowerbank and All.) ; Liyn Regis (Dr. Lowe), &c. Height 2—3 in. Polypites white, ovoid, supported on a fleshy neck. Number of tentacles 12—14, which, like those of Hydra, can be elongated or shortened very remarkably. Reproduction by ova which are developed in the gonophores to ciliated planulz, which on their escape through the ruptured sac undergo remarkable changes in shape. They have been observed to enter upon their fixed state in a few hours. This is the only fixed Hydroid living in fresh water. It appears to have originally flourished in brackish water, and has only very recently been known to inhabit fresh water. Prof. Carl Semper * says, “that when he was a student it was only found in estuaries and at the mouths of rivers, where the * “ Animal Life,” 152, BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 4] water was, at any rate occasionally, salt or brackish. It was discovered almost simultaneously in England and Belgium. Since that time, 1854, the animal has in many places migrated into rivers. At one time it took possession of the great water-pipes of Hamburg in such quantities as to impede the flow of water through the pipes.” Prof. Allman,* Van Beneden, and Dr. Schultze have exhaustively studied this species. FAMILY II. HYDRACTINITDAL. Polypites claviform, sessile, with a single verticil of filiform tentacles round the base of a conical proboscis borne on an expanded and continuous crust ; the cceno- sare naked above.—T. H. Genus I. Hypractinta, Van Beneden. (Hydra, and Actinia, a sea anemone.) Generic character contained in that of family cha- racter. Reproduction by means of fixed sporosacs borne usually on partially developed polypites which are destitute of tentacles, but bear clusters of thread cells around the oral extremity.—T. H. 1. H. ucuinara, Fleming. Alcyonium echinatum (Fl., De B.), Alcyonidium echinatum (G. J., R. Q. C.), H. lactea and H. rosea (V. B.), Echinochorium clavigerum (Has.), Synhydra parasites (Quatrefages), H. polyclina (4g.).t Hab.: Generally distributed on old univalve shells * “ Gymnoblastic Hydroids.” + Mr. Hincks considers this to be the same species as /7. echinata. Prof. Allman, though with some hesitation, considers the species distinct. 42 NATURAL HISTORY OF at low-water mark. Height about 4 in. Polypites white, with 20—30 tentacles. The proboscis capable of great change of shape. Male gonophores yellowish and pointed; female gonophores rose-coloured and rounded. Gonophores borne upon partially developed polypites. Near the edge of the colony are a number of long, filamentary processes spirally coiled when at rest, but capable of extension, as if for the purpose of de- fence, if any part of the colony be disturbed. These ap- pendages of the ccenosare are armed with thread cells. On the outskirts of the colony are also distributed a number of slender extensile single tentacles. It will be seen from the synonyms that this species was formerly considered to belong to the Polyzoa. FAMILY III. PODOCORYNIDAi. Polypites sessile, with a single verticil of filiform tenta- cula round the base of a conical proboscis.—T. H. Genus I. Popocorynz, Sars (in part). (sods, a foot, and Coryne.) Polypites correspond with family character. Oceno- sare consisting of a network of creeping fibres clothed with a polypary, which forms a small cup-like invest- ment round the base of the polypite. Gonozooid free, medusiform.—T. H. 1. P. carnga, Sars. Plate II. fig. 5. P. albida (Sars), Hydractinia carnea (McA.), H. echinata (Loven). Hab.: On Nassa reticulata, &e. Inch Garvie (All.); Torbay ; Swanage Bay, Dorset; Oban (7. H.) ; Culler- coats (Ald.). Height about % in. Polypites tall, expanding slightly upwards, white or reddish; pro- BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 43 boscis white. Tentacles 4—30. Gonophores borne in clusters on the body of the polyp some distance below the tentacles. Mr. Hincks has clearly made out the presence in this species of spiral and tentaculoid appendages, similar to those which are so prominent a feature of the preceding species (A. and M. of N.H., February, 1877, 150). It is curious also to notice that the shells upon which this species and H. echinata establish themselves are usually occupied by hermit crabs. . 2. P. angouata, Ald. Hydractinia areolata (Ald.), Rhizoclina areolata (All/.). Hab.: Cullercoats (Ald.), Shetland (A. M. N.), Seaham Harbour (Hodge). Height A, in. Polypites white, terminating in a conical mouth. Tentacles 6—10. Base of colony chitinous, set with “simple linear spines in irregular groups.” Gonophores sessile, borne on the stolon and not on the polypites. 3. P. proposcrpga, 7’. H. Hab.: Ilfracombe (7. H.). Polypite orange-brown, tall and rather stout, having a long columnar proboscis of opaque white colour. Tentacles about 14. Gono- phores “forming a large collar round the polypite, a short distance below the tentacles, borne in two rows on small tubercles.”’ First described by Mr. Hincks in the appendix to “ British Hydroid Zoophytes,” p. 317. Genus II. Corynopsis, Allman. (xopvvn, a club, and ores, face.) Polypites corresponding with family character, clavi- form, rising from a creeping stolon clothed with a polypary: Gonozooid medusiform.—T, H. 44, NATURAL HISTORY OF 1. C. AtpErt, Hodge. Podocoryne Alderi, Hodge. Hab.: Seaham Harbour, Durham, on Serpula(Hodge). Height j—}3 in. Polypites pale pink, gradually taper- ing towards the base. Tentacles 6—12. Described by Mr. Hodge (from a specimen developed from a free medusa) in 'l'rans. of Tyneside Nat. Field Club, v. 82. Genus III. Cronistss, 7. S. W. (cov, a pillar.) Polypites sessile, developed on a reticulated stolon. Reproduction by fixed sporosacs. Gonophores borne on rudimentary polypites.—T’. H. Prof. Allman classes this amongst the Bimeride (Atractylide of Hincks), but the polypites of that family are borne on developed stems, whereas those of Cionistes are sessile. 1. C. reticunata, 7. S. W. Hab.: Granton, New Edinburgh (7. 8. W.). Paoly- pites “minute, white, with a row of short tentacles. Gonophores borne on the sides of blastostyles, which, with the polypites, spring from a reticulated stolon.” Described by Dr. Wright in A. N. H., August, 1861, 123. FAMILY IV. HYDROLARIDA. Polypites with a very small number of filiform tentacula springing from the base of the proboscis, but not forming a circle round it.—T, H. This family is the “ Laride” of Hincks, a name not admissible, having been previously applied to a family of birds. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 45 Genus Lar, Gosse. (Lar, a household god.) Polypites fusiform, sessile ; two tentacula developed on a creeping and anastomosing filiform stolon.— fee a. ot. i. SAzriarom, P. H.G. Plate IIT. fig. 1. This species was first observed by Mr. Gosse on the tube of a Sabella in his aquarium. The appearance of the polypites is ‘ridiculously like that of a minute doll,” and, according to Mr. Gosse’s description, it closely imitates certain human motions and incessantly bows and tosses its arms in an energetic manner. Mr. Gosse’s account is as follows: ‘ A slender creeping thread, irregularly crossing and anastomosing so as to form a loose network of about three meshes in width, surrounds the margin of the Sabella’s tube, adhering firmly to its exterior surface, in the chitinous substance of which it seems imbedded. Here and there free buds are given off, especially from the lower edge, while from the upper threads spring the strange forms that have attracted our attention. ‘These are spindle- shaped bodies, about one-fortieth of an inch in height, whose lower extremities are of no greater thickness than the thread from which they spring, with a head- like lobe at the summit, separated from the body by a constriction, immediately below which two lengthened arms project in a direction towards the axis of the tube. The motions of the polyps are not rhythmical, but each individual appears to be animated by a distinct volition. The head lobe encloses a central cavity, and the arms are hollow with thick walls. Examined with a power of 560 diameters, the arms are seen to be formed of globose cells made slightly polyhedral by 46 NATURAL HISTORY OF mutual pressure, set in single series.” Mr. Gosse states that he saw one of them open the head lobe and unfold it in the form of a broad shovel-shaped expanded disc. This form was first discovered by Mr. Gosse in 1855, and was not observed afterwards till 1872, when it came under the notice of Mr. Hincks. Mr. Gosse published a memoir on it in the Trans. Linn. Soe., xx. 113; and Mr. Hincks published a paper on it in the ~ A. and M. of N. H., November, 1872. FAMILY V. CORYNIDAL. Polypites with capitate tentacula scattered or in several whorls.—T. H. Prof. Allman, who, as before stated, bases the characteristics of his families upon the method of reproduction as well as the appearance of the polypite, divides the Corynide of Hincks into two families, namely, Corynide, comprising the genus Coryne, in which the reproduction is by fixed sporosacs, and Syncorynide, comprising the genera Syncoryne, Gym- nocoryne, and Zanclea, in which reproduction is by free medusz. Genus I. Coryne, Gaertner. (xopvvn, a club.) Stem simple or branched, rooted by a creeping fili- form stolon, the whole sheathed in a thin chitinous tube smoothed or annulated. Polypites terminal, with tentacles as described above. Reproduction by fixed sporosacs on the body of the polypite.—T. H. 1. C. pustnia, Gaertner. Plate ITI. fig. 2. Syncoryne pusilla (Hhr.), Syncoryna Listerii (V. B.), C. glandulosa (Dal., Lk.), C. ramosa (Ald.), C. sessilis BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 47 (P. H. G),* Hermia glandulosa (G. J.), Tubularia coryna (Gmel., Lin.). Hab.: Scotland (Dal.), Tynemouth (Howse), Filey, Ilfracombe, Torquay, Hastings (7. H.), Bangor (A. 8S. P.). Height 1 in. Stem annulated, dark horn colour. Polypites reddish colour, tapering very slightly. Tentacles very numerous, 30 at least, irre- gularly arranged and ending in capitula, which are very large and armed with thread cells. The young of this species is described by Gosse, in his “Devonshire Coast,” under the name “Coryne sessilis”? or the sessile Coryne. He describes the polyps as about , in. high. He counted as many as 45 tentacles on one head arranged in about six whorls. Mr. Gosse also describes a variety in which the investing tube was gelatinous. In this case in a few days the specimen shrunk into a shapeless club with all the tentacles agglutinated in a mass round the body. There is a considerable difference of opinion amongst naturalists as to the identity of the species referred to this genus. 2. C. vacinata, Hincks. C. ramosa (G. J., P. H..G., Ald., McA.), Coryne (List). Hab. : Ilfracombe, Swanage, Clew Bay (7. H.); Cork (All.); Channel Islands. Height 3or4in. Polypary branched, annulated and horny, except the last three or four rings which protect the neck of the polypite, and are membranous. Stem yellowish-brown and so transparent as to admit of an examination of the * Prof. Allman treats this provisionally as a distinct species, and not as a synonym of C. pusilla (G. H. 271). 48 NATURAL HISTORY OF structure of the ccenosare. Polypite fusiform, tapering towards the neck and mouth; colour white, with a centre of reddish-brown. Tentacles 15—380, tipped with red or rose colour, and arranged in 4 or 5 some- what indistinct whorls. They are mobile, but when at rest are either at right angles to the body or curved inwards. Ova large. Mr. Gosse (Dev. Coast) describes the polypite every. graphically, and states that he has seen as many as 25 ova expelled from one gonophore in a minute. The ova exhibited amceboid movements after expul- sion. 3. C. vermicoLaRis, 7’. H. Hab.: Shetland, in deep sea zone (7. H.). Height 8 in. Polypite large worm-like, and growing in shrubby tufts. Tentacles about 25, with large capitula, arranged in whorls with considerable distances between the rows. Stem only slightly ringed. 4. C. rruticosa, 7. H. Hab.: Exmouth, Mounts Bay (7. H.); Herm, on fucus (Hodge). Height 13 in. Polypite delicate, growing in dense bushes. Stems distinctly annulated and more or less transparent. Tentacles 20. Prof. Allman is disposed to regard this as a variety of C. pusilla. 5. C. Van BEneDEnl. Described by Van Beneden under the name of Syncoryne pusilla. This is given by Mr. Hincks as an English species upon the authority of a figure drawn by Dr. Johnston from British specimens, but no British habitat is known, and Prof. Allman treats it as a foreign species under the name Actigoniwm pusillum. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 49 6. C. nutans (?), Allman. Hab.: Barraforth Caves, Shetland (A. M.N.). Height 2 in, This is the name given provisionally by Prof. Allman to some specimens obtained by Mr. Norman, and pre- served in spirits, which did not show the reproductive organs (Allman, G. H., 271). Genus IL Syncoryne, Ehrenberg (in part). Stem, polypite, and tentacles as Coryne. Gonophores borne on the body of the polypite, and containing medusiform zooids, having (at the time of liberation) a bell-shaped or globular umbrella and four marginal tentacles springing from ocellated bulbs.—T. H. The distinction between this genus and the preceding is, therefore, that this genus is reproduced by me- dusiform gonozooids. The differences between the gonozooids of the different species at the time of liberation are very slight. 1. S. exmaa, All. Coryne eximia (All., McA.), C. Listerii (Ald.). Hab.: Along the north-eastern coast, where it is the common species of the genus, Height 3 to 4 in. Stems straw-coloured and transparent, smooth, except just above the points of branching, where the branches are ringed ; branchlets mostly developed on one side of the branch. The polypites are pale pink, with 20 —30 tentacles scattered, except 4 at the distal end. 2. S. Sarsiz, Loven. S. ramosa (Loven), S. Lovenii (Sars),* Coryne Sarsii (McA.). * Prof, Allman treats this as a separate species, not included amongst the British fauna (G. H., 276), E 50 NATURAL HISTORY OF Hab.: Firth of Forth, Durham. Height in. Stems slender, sparingly branched and indistinctly annulated. Polypites pale rose colour. . 12—16 tentacles. Gono- phores developed among the tentacles. 3. S. gravata, 7. S. W. Coryne gravata (T. S. W., McA.), Sarsia and Coryne mirabilis (Ag.),* Tubularia stellifera (Couth). Hab.: North Berwick, Filey Brigg. Height } in. Stem smooth and slender. Polypites colourless, small, with 10—12 short tentacles. A peculiarity about them is that the heads of the polypites often disappear, leav- ing the stalk with one or two medusiform gonozooids. Or Plate X. of Hincks’ “ British Hydroid Zoo- phytes,” are figured the different forms and stages of this species, which show the atrophied forms of the polypites very distinctly. This species has been very fully investigated by Agassiz, both in its complete form and its embryo stages. 4, S. Decrprens, Duj. ? Laomedea pulchella (McA.). Hab.: Firth of Forth (7. 8. W.). This is a species little known. The peculiarities of the polypite are the possession of a prominent trumpet- shaped proboscis and the small number, 8 or 9, of its _ tentacles. Prof. Allman, however, excludes this from the British species. 5. S. PULCHELLA, All. Hab.: Skelmorlie, Firth of Clyde (All.). Height 4in. Polypite deep orange. Tentacles 15—20. This species is described by its discoverer, Prof. * Prof. Allman treats this as a separate species, not included amongst the British fauna (G. H., 278). BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. Bil Allman, as being allied to the preceding species, but being more ovate in form and having more numerous tentacles. 6. S. rerox, 7. §. W. Hab.: Firth of Forth (7.8: W.). This species is described by Dr. Wright in the Journal of Anat. and Physiol., i. 835. It is nearly allied to S. decipiens, and is not improbably identical with the S. pulchella of Allman. 7. S. Frurescens, All. Hab.: Kingston, Dublin (All.). Height 1—2 in. Polypite light pink, oval. Tentacles 14. Described by Prof. Allman in G. H., 281. Geyus III. Zancina, Gegenbaur.* As Syncoryne, except that the umbrella of the free gonozooid is nearly spherical at the time of liberation, and the marginal tentacles are two, springing fron non-ocellated bulbs.—T. H. 1. Z. implexa, Ald. Tubularia implexa (Ald.), Coryne implexa (Ald., T. S. W., UcA.), Coryne pelagica (Ald.), C. Briareus (All.), Gemmaria implexa (All.). Hab. ; Holy Isl., Northumberland (Howse) ; Culler- coats (Ald.); Seaham (Hodge) ; Inch Garvie Ci Sa. )g Firth of Forth (All.). Height 3—3 in. Polypites white, with gastric cavity pale pink, growing in tangled masses. Polypary composed of two coats, an inner horny annulated one, extending only a short distance * Prof. Allman refers Z. inflexa to the genus Gemmaria. Mr. Hincks considers the two genera, Zanclea and Gemmaria, to be identical, ; fr pe NATURAL HISTORY OF from the stolon, and an outer membranous one. Tentacles number 40—50, set in imperfect rows. Prof. Allman, in his “ Notes on the Hydroida,”’ in Annals of Nat. Hist., July, 1864, describes fully the structure of the tentacles, which are very small. Genus IV. Gymyocorrne, Hincks. Polypites sessile, on a creeping filiform stolon in- vested with achitinous polypary. Tentacles numerous, the distal ones in a verticil round a conical proboscis, the others scattered over the body. Reproduction unknown.—T. H. 1. G. coronata, T. H. Hab.: Salcombe Bay (7. H.). Polypite very minute, body reddish, proboscis white, with 40 or more ten- tacles, of which 8 or 9 at the distal end are thicker, have larger capitula, and form a verticil. Described by Mr. Hincks in Annals of N. H., August, 1871. FAMILY VI. PENNARIIDAi. Polypites clavate or subcylindrical, with two kinds of tentacles, one kind capitate and disposed in one or more verticils, the other filiform and without capitula. I have altered the diagnosis of this family so as to include all the genera Cladonema, Stauridium, Vorti- clava, and Acharadria. Prof. Allman places Cladonema in a distinct family, which he calls Cladonemide, and ranks the three other genera amongst the Pennariide. Mr. Hincks places Cladonema and Stauridiwm in the family Stauridiide, and Vorticlava and Acharadria amongst the Pennartide. His reason for separating BRITISH ZOOPHYTES, 53 them is that he considers the proximal filiform tentacles in Stauridium and Cladonema, which he describes as rigid in the species belonging to these genera, to be merely tactile organs, and not tentacular in function. Prof. Allman, however, describes the proximal tentacles of Cladonema not as rigid but as “ less contractile than the distal ones.” I have, therefore, extended the diagnosis of the family so as to include all the genera. Genus I. Craponrema, Dujardin. Stems simple or branched, rooted by a creeping filiform stolon, the whole invested by a polypary. Polypites clavate, borne on the summit of the stems and branches. Tentacles arranged in single verticils in the form of two crosses, the proximal tentacles only slightly mobile without capitula, covered towards the extremity with palpocils. Gonophores on the body of the polypite originating free medusiform zooids. Gonozooid bell-shaped, with 8—10 radiating canals. Mr. Saville Kent (“ Infusoria,” 264) has given the name Cladonema to a genus of Infusoria, but as the name was given to this genus of Hydroids by Dujardin so long ago as 1843, it clearly belongs to it of right, and should stand. 1. C. rapiatom, Dujardin. Coryne Stauridia (P. H. G., McA.), Stauridie (Du/j.). Hab.: Devonshire (P. H. G.) ; Zoological Gardens in tanks, Kent (Dowker). Height $—1 in. Stem smooth, slender and creeping, light yellowish-brown in colour. Polypite pale red. Tentacles arranged in two cruciform verticils, 4 in each. The proximal ones capitate and longer than the distal ones, which are filiform and only slightly, if at all, mobile. 54 NATURAL HISTORY OF This species has been observed and described by many naturalists, from Dujardin (1843) to the present time. Mr. Gosse describes it, under the name of the Slender Coryne, as “ creeping irregularly in the form of a white thread about the same thickness as a human hair. This thread is cylindrical and tubular, perfectly hyaline and without any vestige of rings or wrinkles. The thread is very long in proportion to its thickness, and here and there starts from its support and sends off free branches, the ramification generally forming an acute angle, and continuing of the same form, structure, and thickness as before. The polyp appears to be a clavate enlargement of the branch, no open end of an investing tube being visible in any part of the zoophyte. The head is transparent, slightly tinged with yellow, corrugated with coarse annulations. The form of the polyp reminds one of a familiar kind of turnstile, or one of those presses the screw of which carries arms loaded at their extremities with globes of metal, to increase their impetus when turned.” The appearance described by Mr. Gosse is caused by the A capitate tentacles arranged like the arms of a cross round the head. These tentacles are covered with small tubercles bearing palpocils. At the opposite extremity of the body, 4 false tentacles are placed at right angles round the polypite. These are rounded and serve as tactile organs. Mr. Hincks states that Mr. E. W. H. Holdsworth succeeded in keeping alive several specimens of the free gonozooid obtained from the tanks in the Zoological Gardens, so as to trace almost the entire course of the reproductive history. Prof. Allman, also, has carefully studied the anatomy BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 55 and development of this species, and has noted his researches in his ‘‘Gymnoblastic Hydroids,” p. 216. He describes it as the first species “in which the entire life-series was followed through the complete succession of polypite, medusa, and planula, and back again to the polypite.” Genus II. Sravripium, Dujardin. Stems as in last genus. Polypites subcylindrical, with several verticils of capitate tentacula arranged in the form of across. Also a row of proximal rigid tentacles.* Gonozooid has 4 radiating canals.—T’. H. 1. S. propuctrum, 7. 8S. W. Plate ITI. fig. 3. Stauridia producta (7. S. W.), Coryne Cerberus Po. G., McA.). Hab.: Ilfracombe (7. H.), Firth of Forth (T. S. W.), Penzance (All.). Height +in. Polypites white, cylindrical, with 12 capitate tentacles disposed in three cruciform equidistant rows. Proximal tentacles rigid, tapering to a blunt point. The capitate tentacles in- crease from 2—12 according to age. Mr. Gosse, under the name of the “ three-headed Coryne,’ describes an immature specimen of this species.t The body of the polypite is stated by him to be very mobile, and the mouth is capable of being used as a sucker. Genus III. Vorrictava, Ald. Polypites borne on simple stems, developed at intervals on a creeping filiform stolon, destitute of a continuous polypary. Yentacles in two dissimilar ver- * Mr. Hincks calls these “ false tentacles.” + “ Devonshire Coast,” p. 222. 56 NATURAL HISTORY OF ticils, the distal ones short and capitate, the proximal ones long and filiform.—T. H., All. This genus is regarded by Mr. Hincks and Prof. Allman as provisional, the development of the species not having been studied. 1. V. numinis, Ald. Hab.: Northumberland (Ald.), Felixstowe (Busk) ; rare. Height+tin. Polypite white, with two verticils of tentacles, 5 distal ones short and capitate, and 10 proximal ones long and filiform. Described from single incomplete specimens. 2. V. proteus, T. S. W. Hab.: Firth of Forth (7. 8. W.). Described by Dr. Wright in Quart. Journ. Mie. Sci., lil. N.S. 5. Genus IV. Acwaranpria, 7’. 8S. W. Stems branched, clothed with a chitinous polypary. Polypites with two rows of tentacles, as in last genus. —T. H. tA, Dagynx, 2S): We. Hab.: Ilfracombe (7. S.W.), Herm. (7. H.). Height about 4 in. Polypites pale orange, with proboscis opaque white at tip and pinkish below. Proximal tentacles 4—12, distal ones 2—8. Stems “ spirally twisted.” Mr. Hincks (A. and M. of Nat. Hist., February, 1877) describes this as a “ well-marked and beautiful species, remarkable for the freedom and activity of the movements of the polyps. The upper portion of the polypary is composed of a very delicate and filmy material, offering no resistance to the movements of the polypite.” BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 57 FAMILY VII. CLAVATELLIDA. Polypites with a single verticil of capitate tentacula surrounding the base of the proboscis. Gonozooids ambulatory. Genus I. CLAVATELLA. Stems simple and very short, rising from a creeping filiform stolon, invested by a polypary. Polypites borne on the summit of the stems. 'onozooids ambu- latory, developed in clusters on the lower portion of the body of the polypite, not enclosed in an investing sac.—T. H. 1. C. pronirera, 7. H. ; Eveurnerta, Krohn. _ Hab.: Devonshire and Yorkshire Coast (T. H.); Cornwall, Cork, and West of Scotland (All.). Height 1 in. Polypites milk white, with distal extremity tinged pink. Body of polypite very extensile, with 8 capitate tentacles arranged in a verticil round the distal end. Gonozooids ambulatory, developed during summer and autumn, and forming “two clusters at opposite points on the lower portion of the body.” The peculiarity of this species is the ambulatory gonozooid, which when developed very much resembles other hydroid medusee in appearance, but not in manner of locomotion. It breaks off from the polypite, and moves about with an ambulatory motion by means of sucking discs at the extremity of the tentacles, each of which is divided into two towards the extremity. Mr. Hincks says that “it bears a considerable resemblance to a Lilliputian star-fish.” 58 NATURAL HISTORY OF FAMILY VIII. MYRIOTHELIDA, Sars. Polypites single, with very many minute capitate tenta- cula scattered over the body.—T. H. Grnus MyrtorHeta, Sars. (yvpios, innumerable, @nrn, a nipple.) Polypites solitary, cylindrical, terminating in a conical proboscis. Tentacles very small, capitate, covering the greater portion of the body.—T. H. M. Cocxsu, Vigurs. Plate III. fig. 4. Arum Cocksii (Vigwrs), Spadix purpurea (P. H. G.), Candelabrum arcticum (Ag.), M. arctica (All), M. Phrygia (All., T. H.). Hab.: Falmouth (Mr.Cocks), Devonshire Coast (T'. H., P. H.G.). Height, 1 to 2 in. when extended. Poly- pites nearly cylindrical, terminating in a conical pro- boscis. Tentacles capitate, tipped with red, densely crowded, covering about three-fourths of the body. Gonophores spherical, borne below the tentacles on short processes; said by Mr. Hincks to be coryni- form (blastostyles), but in Prof. Allman’s opinion peduncles. In the tentacles Prof. Allman discovered the curious sense-organs referred to in the preceding descriptive chapter. This species has until recently been considered identical with the Lucernaria Phrygia of Fabricius (the Myriothela arctica of M. Sars), but Mr. G. O. Sars has shown that that species is distinct from the British one, and therefore the name given by Mr. Vigurs must be restored (Hincks, A. and M. N. H., 4th ser., xii. 136). BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 59 FAMILY IX. EUDENDRIIDA. (ed, well, and dévdpor, a tree.) Polypites borne on a well-developed stem, with a simple verticil of filiform tentacula surrounding the base of a large trumpet-shaped proboscis.*—T. H. Genus Evupenpeium, hr. (in part). Stem branched, rooted by a creeping filiform stolon, the whole invested by a chitinous polypary. Polypites vase-shaped or roundish, and as in family character. Gonophores on body below tentacles, or from stem containing fixed sporosacs.—T’. H. 1. E. ramevum, Pallas. Tubularia ramea (Pal., G. J., Dal., R. Q. C., Bosc), Thoa Savigni (Lamz.), Tubularia ramosa (G. J.). Hab.: Shetland, Hast Coast of England, Scotland, and Ireland, Whitburn, Whitehaven; rare in Corn- wall, Lytham, St. Andrew’s (McI.). Height 3—6 in. Stem much branched. Main stem reddish-brown, often in. in thickness, and with the principal branches composed of a bundle of tubes. Branchlets alternate, slightly ringed at the joints. Polypites rose colour, with vase-shaped proboscis (hypostome) and about 20 tentacles. Gonophores borne as described in generic character. This beautiful species has been a favourite of all zoophytologists. Its tree-like appearance and habit are such as to amply justify its generic name. ~ The usual height is 6 inches, but a height of 9 inches is sometimes attained. The following poetical descrip- * “ With the hypostome abruptly differentiated from the body ” (All., G. H., 330). 60 NATURAL HISTORY OF tion by Sir J. G. Dalyell* has often been quoted as showing the singular beauty and tree-like appearance of this species :—- “This is a splendid animal production—one of the most singular, beautiful, and interesting among the boundless works of nature. Sometimes it resembles an aged tree blighted amidst the war of the elements, or withered by the deep corrosions of time; sometimes it resembles a vigorous flowering shrub in miniature, rising with a dark brown stem, and diverging into numerous boughs, branches, and twigs, terminating in so many hydre, wherein red and yellow intermixed afford a fine contrast to the whole. The glowing colours of the one, and the venerable aspect of the other—their intricate parts often laden with prolific fruit, and their numberless tenants, all highly pic- turesque—are equally calculated to attract our admi- ration to the creative power displayed throughout the universe ; and to sanction the character of this product as one of uncommon interest and beauty.” Mr. McIntosh has found specimens at St. Andrew’s, 9 in. high with a breadth of 8 in. 2. H. ramosum, Linn.. Plate III. fig. 5. Tubularia ramosa (Linn., Lk., Lame., H. and S&., Berk., Turt., Stew., Bosc, Flem., Hogg, Stark, Temp. De B., G. J., R. Q. C.), ? Sertularia racemosa (Cav.), Tubularia trichoides (Pal., De B.), Fistularia ramosa (Mill.), Fistulana ramosa (Fabr.). . Hab.: generally distributed. Height 4—6 in. Stem reddish-brown to black, much branched, branches ringed at origin. Polypite vermilion; about 20 white tentacles. Some of the polypites are armed with a * “ Rem. An. of Scotland,” i, 50, BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 61 curious organ about as thick as three or four tentacles, which is long and club-shaped, and crowned with cnidee towards the extremity. Dr. Weisman was the first to observe this organ (A. and M. of Nat. Hist., ser. 0, vol. ix. p. 201). I have myself found it upon the polypites of this species. Its purpose is very doubtful, as it is only found upon a few of the poly- pites ina colony. It is evidently, however, a defensive weapon of considerable power. This species was described by Ellis* under the name of the “small ramified tubular coralline.’ He found it upon the Kentish coast. It was one of the species which demonstrated to him the animal nature of the: zoophytes. He states that ‘‘ here the curious natu- ralist may plainly discover a polyp branching out like the common fresh-water one of Mr. Trembiey’s, but strongly fortified by nature to support itself in its turbulent situation ; for he will observe this is defended by a tough horny covering, and fixed by its base to solid bodies in the sea, to secure itself from the infi- nite number of enemies that every moment surround Tees 8. EH. annutatum, Norman. Height 4 in. Stem much branched, horn colour. Polypites with 16—20 tentacles. This species was discovered by the Rey. A. M. Norman in “ Buness Hall,” a cave in Shetland. It is described by Mr. Norman in an article on ‘ Unde- scribed British Hydrozoa, &c.,”” in the An. of Nat. Hist. for January, 1864, p. 83. 4, Hi. arsuscuna, 7’. 8S. W. Height 2in. Stem dark horn colour, much branched. * Ellis, ‘ Corallines,” 31. 62 NATURAL HISTORY OF Polypites white, “ with numerous alternate tentacles, base of body surrounded by a ring of thread cells.” Described by Dr. Wright from a single specimen obtained at Queensferry, in the Edin. N. P. Journal, July, 1859, p. 113. 5. E. caprtparg, Alder. Corymbogonium capillare (All.), Dicoryne capillare (Ald.). Hab.: Plymouth (Ald.), Northumberland (Hmble- ton), Firth of Forth (All.), St. Andrew’s (MclI.), Cornwall (7. H.). Height }—% in. Polypites greyish- olive, vase-shaped, with from 20—30 long tentacles. Stem branched irregularly. Branches of equal thick- ness with the stem, and ringed above the point of branching. 6. HK. vacinatom, All. Hab.: Shetland, on the “Out Skerries” (All.). Height 14 in. Polypary deeply ringed. Polypites vermilion, with 18 tentacles. Described by Prof. Allman in An. N. H., January, 1863. 7. EK. rnsiene, 7’. H. KE. humile (All.). Hab.: Torquay (All.), Ilfracombe, Swanage (T’. H.). Height 4—? in. Polypary delicate, reddish-brown, ringed throughout. Polypite yellowish-vermilion, very graceful and beautiful. Tentacles 20—23. FAMILY X. BIMERIDAi. Polypites borne on a stem with a single wreath of filiform tentacula surrounding a conical proboscis. The name given originally to this family was Atrac- BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 63 tylide, from the genus Atractylis, Wright. whom,” adds Dr. Landsborough,-“ under God, he 126 NATURAL HISTORY OF was indebted for much of the happiness of his life. Ter felices et amplius, Sc.” 4, P. ecurnutata, Lamarck. Sertularia setacea (Lister). Hab.: Not uncommon. Height ?—1 in. This species much resembles outwardly P. setacea, but differs much in its smaller size and in several microscopic particulars. ‘The calycles occur on every internode, and have a nematophore above and below each. The gonothecz are ornamented with spinous processes of considerable length. 5, P. srminis, Hincks. P, setacea (D. L.). Hab.: South Devon, Isle of Man (Hincks), Height 1} in. This name is given by Mr. Hincks to the species figured as P. setacea by Dr. Landsborough (Pop. Hist., plate ix. figs. 26, 26a). It is rather larger than the preceding species, which, however, it much resembles. The calycles are free at the extremity, and are separated by two joints, a bare internode occurring between the calycles, each of which has a single nematophore below it. 6. P. optiqua, Saunders. Laomedea obliqua (Saunders, G. J., D.L., P. H.G.), Campanularia (Lister). Hab.: Brighton and South-eastern District. Height + in. Described by Mr. Hincks (A.N.H., 3rd ser., viii. 258). This minute species bears only one calycle on each pinna. The gonothece are many times the size of the calycles. ‘There are two nematophores above, and one below each calycle. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES, 127 7. P. striquosa, Hincks. Hab. : Guernsey. Described in A. N. H., February, 1877. This species, so far as known, is a stemless form, each zoophyte being in appearance like a branch of one of the pinnated forms. The female calycles are long and pod-like. 8. P. HateciorpEs, Alder. Plate IX. fig. 3. Hab.: Cullercoats (Ald.), Shetland, Ilfracombe (Hincks). Height 1 in. “This is a singularly delicate and beautiful spe- cies,” The pinne are alternate, one to each internode of the stem, into which they are set as into joints. The pinne are themselves jointed, and bear few calycles, separated by two or three internodes. Each calycle has a nematophore above and below it, and encloses a polypite, shaped lke an hour-glass, with a wreath of about 20 tentacles, which can be waved in all direc- tious. The length of the pinne vary, gradually short- ening towards the apex. The pinnz never bear more than 3 or 4 calycles, the number regularly decreasing to the uppermost pinna, which bears one. 9. P. rrutescens, H. and SV. Sertularia Gorgonia (Pall.), 8. frutescens (H. and S., Turt., Bosc, Stew., Hogg), Aglaophenia frutescens (Lamk.), Pennaria fruticans (Oken). Hab.: In deep water, rare. St. Andrew’s (MclI.). Height 5—6in. (11 in., Mel.) This is the “Shrubby Coralline” of E.and S. “The stem is black and hard, full of small united tubes, from which come forth rows of small branches disposed alternately in a pinnated order, bending upwards. 128 NATURAL HISTORY OF The denticles (calycles) are of a cylindrical, bell-shaped form.”—E. and S. The pinnz themselves bear short branchlets, which are usually bifid. There are two nematophores above and one below each calycle. There are from one to three calycles to each internode. 10. P. cornucopia, Hincks. Hab.: Captone, Ilfracombe (Hincks). Height $ in. This was described by Mr. Hincks in the A. and M. of Nat. Hist. (4), x. 389. The plumes rise at intervals from a creeping stolon, and are regularly jointed, giving off pinnz at each joint, which are either oppo- site or alternate. The calycles are cup-shaped, and separated by two joints. The sarcothece are placed one on each side of the calycle above and one below it, and one on each of the internodes of the pinne. The female gonophores are horn-shaped; with the curve towards the calycles, from the base of which they arise. Sus-pivision: STATOPLHA PHYLACTOCARPA. Genus III. Actaopnenta, Lamourouz (in part). Shoots plumose, simple or branched, rooted by a fili- form stolon. Hydrothece cup-shaped or tubulous, usually with an intrathecal ridge. Nematophores fixed, two lateral and one mesial in connection with each calycle. Gonothecc collected in corbule.— Allman. The corbula referred to is ‘‘a pinna modified so as to form a protective envelope for the gonothece.” See Plate X. fig. 2. 1. A. pLuma, Lamarck. Plate IX. fig. 5. Sertularia pluma (Linn., Pall., Esper., Lister, H. and BRITISH ZOOPHYTES, 129 S., Stew.), Plumularia cristata (Lamk., Temps Gs, HioG@.0., D.L., Mcd.), P. pluma (Flem., De BP EEG), Pennaria pluma (Oken). Hab.: Ayrshire (D. L.), Filey (T. H.), Isle of Man (7. H.), Jersey (A. WV. N.), South Devon (7. H.), Menai Straits (A. 9. P.). Height to 3 in. This is a very graceful little zoophyte. The shoots are simple, divided into internodes with alternate pinnae. The calycles are cup-shaped and closely packed on the upper side of the pinne ; they have a toothed margin. The lateral nematophores are small; the mesial one js well developed, but does not project much beyond the calycle. This is the “Podded Coralline” of Ellis. This name he seems to have given in consequence of his observa- tions on the “ corbulze,” which he likened to seed-pods. The calycles he likened to the flowers of the “ lily of the valley.” 2. A. TuBuLirEera, Hincks. Plumularia cristata, var. (R. Q. OFGAR): Hab.: Cornwall, Oban (Hincks), Hebrides (A. M. N.). Height 2—3 in. This is a larger but more delicate species than the preceding, to which it bears, however, a great resem- blance. The lateral nematophores are prominent and projecting. The corbule are “ furnished with an ex- panded, spur-like process, with serrated edges spring- ing from the base at one side.” 3. A. pLumosa, Pennington. Plate X. fig. 1. Hab.: Seascale (A. 8. P.). Height about 2 in. Stem simple or sparingly branched on one side. Ramuli alternate, and much branched towards the extremity of the stem, these secondary branchlets K 130 NATUBAL HISTORY OF being again branched, so as to give the shoot a plumose appearance. Calycles cup-shaped with serrated margins, three teeth on each side, two much everted. Mesial sarco- theca freer than in 4. pluma, and quite prominent. Lateral sarcothece prominent and tubular. Gono- phores borne in corbulze with spur-like processes, as in A. tubulifera. The zoophyte springs from a creeping stolon. A large number (from 15—20) of stems arise from a single stolon. Genus IV. lLyrtocarrus, Kirchenpauer. Stem doubly or simply pinnate. Calycles with ser- rated or undulated margin, and with the mesial nema- tophore opening externally by one or two orifices. Gonophores protected by detached, over-arching pro- cesses, which never form corbules.—Allman. There is only one British species of this genus, the distinguishing characteristic of which is the protective case for the gonophores, which consist of “cylindrical or spine-like appendages, which over-arch, but are never united so as to form a closed chamber.” 1. L. myrropHytium, Linn. Sertularia myriophyllum (Linn., Pall., Hsper., EL. and S., Berk., Stew., Bosc), Plumularia myriophyllum (Temp., G.d., D. L., BR. Q. C., P. H. G., MeA., De B.), Pennaria myriophyllum (Oken), Aglaophenia myrio- phyllum (Lamea., Ag., I’. H.). Hab.: Rare. Lamlash Bay (D. L.), Torbay (T. #.), Dartmouth (Busk), Aberdeen (Macgillivray), Dublin (Ellis), Isle of Man (forbes). Height 6—12 in. “ This very rare coralline grows to the height of 10 BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 131 or 12 inches. The root or first beginning consists of an irregular tuft of extremely small tubes, appearing like a piece of sponge to the naked eye. Several of these little tubes, rising together and united in close contact, become a stalk, which appears in the micro- Scope curiously channelled and indented.”— Ellis. This is the “ Pheasant-tail Coralline ;” and an inte- resting incident is related respecting this species by Dr. Landsborough (Popular History). Dr. Johnston, in the first edition of his “ British Zoophytes,” remarked that the vesicles of this species were a desideratum. Dr. Landsborough sent him a specimen having the vesicles upon it, which, he informs us, “was got by a fisherman, adhering to his long lines, off Whiting Bay, Arran, who, being struck with its beauty, like a kind-hearted man, took it home as a present to his wife; and she, being a person of similar taste, admired it as much as her husband had done. With all due care, therefore, she planted it in an old teapot filled with earth, and, watering it with fresh water every morning, she had the satisfaction of think- ing that it grew a little larger under her judicious management! What would have been her delight had she foreseen that her sea-born, earth-nourished favourite was to flourish for ages in Dr, Johnston’s well-known History !” Very recently I was told by a Filey fisherman, who observed me taking a specimen of A. ramosa out of the dredge, that he “had had one of that kind, which stuck to his lines, growing in a plant pot out of doors, and that it had stood the winter very well” ! The pinnz of this species appear to be given off on one side. This arises from the fact that, although the K 2 132 NATURAL HISTORY OF pinne are alternate, they are given off “so uearly in a single line as generally to fold together.” Sus-pivision: STATOPLEA GYMNOCARPA. Genus V. Haticornaria, Busk. Like Aglaophenia, but without corbule or other pro- tective case for the gonophores. This genus, originally proposed by Mr. Busk witha somewhat different diagnosis, was established by Prof, Allman (Hydroida of the Porcupine, Zool. Soc. Trans., 1874) for those zoophytes, otherwise resembling Aglao- phenia, which have no protective corbulze or cases. 1. H. pennarota, H. and S. Sertularia pennatula (H. and S., Bosc, Flem.), Plumu- laria pennatula (Lamk., Flem., G.J., R. Q.C., D. L., P. H. G., McA.), Aglaophenia pennatula (Lame., Ag., mE), Hab.: Very rare. On the South Coast. Height 3—6 in. This is the “ Sea-pen or Feather Coralline” of E. and S., in whose notes it is described as being “as remarkable for the elegance of its form as for its like- ness to the feather of a pen.” In this species, which is very rare, the pinne are alternate and very close together, so as often almost to overlap. The calycles are crowded together on the upper side of the pinne, and each of them is denticulated at the sides and pro- tected by a spinous process, which rises to some distance over the orifice and then bends over it. These spines vary in curvature. In one of my specimens the spines on the pinnz on one side of the stem are all almost BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 133 straight, and on the pinne on the other side they curve considerably over the calycles. The gonothece are not developed into corbule, but are somewhat pyriform in shape. Sus-Orper III. G@YMNOCHROA. (EievTHEROBLAstea, Allman.) FAMILY I. HYDRIDA. Genus Hypra, Linneus. Polypites locomotive, single, destitute of polypary, cylindrical or subcylindrical, with a single series of filiform tentacles round the mouth and a discoid adhe- sive base. G'onozooids always fixed, developed in the body walls.—T. H. The structure of the members of this genus has been already fully described in the descriptive chapter. The different species are all inhabitants of fresh water. The ease with which specimens of Hydrez can be secured makes them objects of constant interest and experiment. The most popular experiments are those conducted with a view to test their vitality. From the times of Baker and Trembley to the present, observers have been at work trying to what extent this much- suffering animal would bear mutilation. Baker, in the tenth chapter of his work on ‘ The Polyp,” gives a course of experiments, amongst which are the following, which show an advancing scale of destructiveness and torture contrived with singular 134 NATURAL HISTORY OF ingenuity. 1. Cutting off a polyp’s head. 2. Cutting a polyp in two pieces. 3. Cutting a polyp in three pieces. 4. Cutting the head of a polyp in four pieces. 5. Cutting a young polyp in two pieces whilst still hanging to its parent. 6. Slitting a polyp open and cutting off the end of its tail. 7. Cutting a polyp with four young ones hanging on it. 8. Quartering a polyp. 9. Turning a polyp inside out. 10. An attempt to make the divided parts of different polyps unite. 11. A young polyp becoming its parent’s head. This is a course of torture sufficient to satisfy the most deter- mined vivisectionist. Baker, not satisfied with sug- gesting the course, has elaborately described and figured the different stages of the experiments. Mr. Dunkerley, of Manchester, has recently suc- ceeded in most of these experiments, including the ninth. He informs us (“Microscopical News,” October, 1883) that the hydra will sometimes turn itself inside out of its own accord, and that he himself has effected this result. Whether the hydra reversed the process afterwards, we are not told; but this is highly probable, as a continual reversement would imply an exchange of functions of the ectoderm and endoderm cells. The hydra was discovered by Leeuwenhoek in 1703, and an anonymous Englishman communicated a similar discovery to the Royal Society about the same time. It was not much noticed, however, till Trembley’s experiments, after which hydra were imported by scientific men as valuable curiosities. They were re- discovered in England in 1743 by a Mr. Ducane, of Essex. The important results consequent upon the investigations undertaken at this time, have been noticed in the introduction. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 135 1. H. viripis, Linneus. Plate IX. fig. 7. Polypes verds (Trembley), Hydra viridissima (Pul.). Hab.: Common. This species is distinguished by its grass-green colour (produced by chlorophyll), and by possessing 6—10 tentacles shorter than the body. 2. H. vutearis, Pallas. H. Grisea (Linn.), H. Brunnea (Templeton), Hab.: Common. This species is of an orange-brown colour, with 7—12 tentacles, which are rather longer than the body. 3. H. rusca or oniaantis, Pallas, H. verucosa (T'emp.). Hab.: Still waters, rather rare. This species is of a brownish colour, and is noticeable by having the lower part of the body attenuated, and by possessing the power of extending the tentacles to an enormous length. llis called it the ‘ Long-armed Fresh-water Polyp.” 4, H. artenvata, Pallas. H. pallens (Twrt.). This species is probably a variety of H. vulgaris. 136 NATURAL HISTORY OF ACTINOZOA (ANTHOZOA). I. ZOANTHARIA. Description. The Zoantharia or sea-anemones are animals very different in appearance from those already noticed, being all visible to the naked eye, and sometimes attaining a considerable size. They are often exceed- ingly beautiful in colour; and an observer, seeing them with fully extended disc and tentacles, has diffi- culty in persuading himself that he is not looking at ° some highly variegated specimens of the floral world. But flower-like as they are, their structure and habits are essentially animal. They differ from the hydrozoa in the facts, that the mouth does not open directly into the body cavity, and that the reproductive elements are borne along the margins of septa which divide the body cavity into compartments or chambers. A sea-anemone (see Plate XI. figs. 1, 2) may be de- scribed as an animal having a body of a more or less columnar shape, terminated at the lower extremity by the base or pedal disc and at the upper extremity by the oral disc (di). The pedal disc is sometimes scarcely defined, the columnar body gradually tapering at the base; but the oral disc is always distinct. The oral disc bears the tentacles (t), which are extensions of the body wall, and communicate directly with the body cavity. In the centre of the oral disc is the mouth (m) opening into the cesophagus (cs), which is grooved, and hangs from the sides of the mouth BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 137 like a bottomless sac. This cesophagus extends only part way between the oral and pedal discs, and communicates at the bottom called the “ gastric ori- fice,” or “cardia,” with the general body cavity. The general body cavity is divided into compartments by septa, which are lamellz or plates, springing from the body wall and extending towards the cesophagus. Some of these septa reach to the cesophagus, to which they are attached. ‘These are called primary septa. Between these are others reaching not quite to the cesophagus ; these are called secondary septa. Between these, again, are tertiary septa, and so on, each suc- ceeding group of septa being smaller than the preced- - ing one; so that the body of an anemone being divided into six parts or systems by six primary septa, the succession of septa in any one system would be shown as follows— Diy Sine eotrel the primary septa reaching to the cesophagus, and the rest, according to their grade, becoming shorter and shorter. This appearance is shown in Plate XI. fig. 3. Deviations from this mode of arrangement, as in the Cerianthide, will be noticed where they occur. The septa, whether primary or otherwise, bend to- wards the column from a point near the lower termina- tion of the cesophagus, leaving the body cavity almost open from below that point. The septa, or, as they are sometimes called, “‘ mesen- teries,”’ are very important parts of structure, as they bear the reproductive organs, the craspeda (cr) or me- senteric filaments, and, where present, the acontia (ac). Such being the general appearance of the sea- 188 NATURAL HISTORY OF anemones, the different points of structure may be more fully dealt with. . The structure of the body wall and septa reveals the presence of a threefold layer of cells, forming respec- tively the ectoderm (ec), mesoderm (mes), and endo- derm (en). (See Plate XI. fig. 4.) The mesoderm may be taken as the groundwork of the structure, and extends throughout the body wall, cesophagus, and septa. The ectoderm extends along the outside of the body wall and the inside of the cesophagus. The endoderm covers the whole interior of the body wall and tentacles, and lines the septa on both sides. The ectoderm, according to the most recent observers, Heider and Hertwig, contains three principal layers of cells—epithelial, nervous (n), and muscular (m). The epithelial cells are found to possess well-defined cha- racteristics, and to be capable of subdivision into four layers—ciliated, stinging, glandular, and sensory. The ciliated cells bear a bunch of cilia ora simple flagellum, the latter form, however, occurring oftener in the epi- thelial cells of the endoderm. The form of the cilia is liable to modification, those on the tentacles being modified so as probably to serve tactile purposes. The stinging or urticating cells, or nematocysts (c), contain the stinging threads. The glandular (d) cells contain glandular secretions. The sensory cells are fine and filamentous, and give off nerve threads. All the epithelial cells, except the glandular ones, give off processes, either in the form of cilia or tactile bristles. The stinging and sensory cells are most numerous in the epithelium of the oral disc and tentacles, the ciliated and glandular cells increasing on the column and base. The nervous layer (n) of the ectoderm is found at the BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 139 base of the epithelial cells, and consists of nerve fibres and ganglion cells, the latter giving off fibrille from the different angles. The muscular layer (7) consists of flat, spindle-shaped, muscular fibrille, generally attached to epithelial cells, which are accordingly called epithelio-muscular. These muscular fibrillz are strengthened by repeated pleatings. The muscular layer often extends into the mesoderm. The pigment granules, to which the colours of the anemones are due, lie in masses below the epithelial layer. The mesoderm (mes) consists of layers of fibrille often closely interwoven. The mesoderm is thickest in the body wall and septa, and thinnest in the tentacles. There are also often found connective tissue cells scattered amongst the fibrille. The endoderm consists of a muscular layer and a layer of cylindrical epithelial cells, each armed with a single flagellum. Nerve cells are found sparsely distributed. The muscles of the column or body wall are almost always highly developed just below the oral disc, where they form a muscle or sphincter, which some- times enables the disc to be drawn below the upper portion of the column, and so covers the tentacles. The power to retract the tentacles depends on the presence of a weak or strong sphincter. Some ob- servers assert the presence of a special sphincter to close the cardia of the cesophagus ; but others, includ- ing the brothers Hertwig, deny this. The muscles of the septa take different directions, those on one side being transverse, those on the other longitudinal. The base or pedal disc is generally imperforate. In some species, where the pedal disc is wanting, there is an anal pore as in Cerianthus. Occasionally the 140 NATURAL HISTORY OF pedal dise is furrowed, the furrows having a distinct relation to the arrangement of the septa. The tentacles are hollow and are prolongations of the body cavity. Their number bears a distinct rela- tion to the interseptal and intraseptal chambers (i.e. the segments into which the body cavity is divided by the principal and secondary septa). They are perfo- rated at the tip, and can be opened and closed at the will of the animal, being supplied near the orifice with a sphincter muscle. Many species are able to extend individual tentacles to a considerable distance. ‘he mouth is a simple longitudinal opening in the centre of the oral disc, and forms the entrance to the cesophagus. ‘There are two lip-like folds, one on each side of the mouth. The shape of the mouth enables the body to be described with reference’ to it, two axes being clearly defined, the sagittal axis running in the direction of the mouth and the transverse axis at right angles toit. The cesophagus (es) or, as some observers have called it, the stomach, is marked with furrows or grooves running from top to bottom, those which pro- ceed from the angles of the mouth being larger and deeper, and generally passing near the gastric orifice into lappets which hang down from the base of the j@sophagus. These larger grooves are always open and richly ciliated, and are called “ gonidial grooves.” Some observers have detected coloured masses in the walls of the cesophagus, which they suspect to have a biliary action. The septa, as before described, divide the body cavity into distinct segments. The usual arrangement amongst the Zoantharia is hexameral (i.e. that there are six primary septa). In most cases also there are BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 141 six secondary and twelve tertiary septa. After the _ tertiary septa have been formed, only two of each succeeding group appear in each sextant, so that the arrangement of a sextant containing septa up to the fifth order would be as follows— fe oo 2 oo ae The septa are often perforated by foramina or sto- mata, which serve to promote the circulation of fluid along the chambers of the body cavity. The craspeda or mesenteric filaments (cr) lie upon the edges of the septa and are formed by the supporting lamella splitting into two parts which enclose the ovary, and then uniting in the form of a cylindrical cord like “the hem of a flounced garment.” The craspeda consist of a middle portion containing large numbers of urticating cells and two lateral lamin of ciliated cells. The use of the craspeda is somewhat uncertain, some observers regarding them as oviducts, The acontia (ac) are extremely interesting portions of structure. ‘They are present in all the Sagartide, and have the appearance of long, thread-like filaments or cords, capable of being ejected through the mouth or body wall to a considerable distance and then re- tracted. They lie coiled at the lower end of the septa. Many species eject these acontia in large numbers on the least provocation. If a small portion be cut off and examined under a high power of the microscope, an extraordinary structure is manifest. The whole acontium is seen to be a ribbon with a band of connec- tive tissue, nerves, and muscular fibres, and an immense number of large thread cells. This ribbon possesses great powers of movement, and portions may be seen, 142 NATURAL HISTORY OF after being cut off, to coil and uncoil themselves whilst under examination. The acontium is ciliated all over, and is either kidney-shaped in transverse section (Hertwig) or flat, but capable of bringing its edges together so as to form a tube (Gosse). The acontia are often emitted through the body wall of the column, which, in many species, is provided with special loopholes for the purpose. These loopholes were first discovered by Mr. Gosse, who gave to them the name of cinclides. (See Plate XI. fig. 6.) They occur in the Sagartidez, and are described by Mr. Gosse as presenting an appearance such as would be presented by the lids of the human eye, supposing them to be reversed. The cinclides appear to be covered by a thin membranous film, either of mucus or epithelium. An interesting description of the cinclides and the acontia is contained in Mr. Gosse’s “ Hours with the Microscope.” The thread cells with which the acontia are crowded are remarkable structures. Three forms have been observed and described by Mr. Gosse. 1. Chambered cnidz, which are lengthened, egg- shaped cells, containing a fusiform chamber opening out at the broader end and continued at the other end into a long cord or thread (the ecthorewm), which fills up the cell and is often many times longer than the cnida. The ecthorea aré generally armed with spiral bands or screws (strebla), to which are attached barbs or bristles (pterygia). (See Plate XI. fig. 5b, c.) 2. Tangled cnid, in which the figure of the cnida is almost oval. ‘The cavity contains a very long ectho- reum, which is coiled up often in a loose and irregular manner. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 143 3. Spiral cnide, in which the ecthoreum is a long, cylindrical thread, coiled into a close and regular spiral. (See Plate XI. fig. 5 a.) The threads are tubular, and are believed to be ejected from the cnide by the expansion under irritation of the fluid contained in the cnide, which expels the threads with very considerable force. How the threads act so as to inflict fatal wounds upon the minute organisms into which they enter is not properly known. Mr. Gosse considers that the ecthorea are filled with some poisonous fluid which pours out through openings in the barbs, and enters the tissues of the animal attacked, the everted form of the barbs preventing the withdrawal of the ecthoream when once inserted. The British anemones belonging to the sub-order Sclerodermata deposit a corallum or internal calcareous skeleton. ‘The parts of the corallum are the base and wall, the latter sometimes ribbed, the plates formed in the septa, the palules, which are arranged in a circle or circles between the septal plates and the centre, and the columella, which is a series of twisted plates at the bottom of the cavity. The plates, like the septa, are arranged in cycles. The hollow centre of the coral above the plates is called the calyz. There are three modes of reproduction amongst the anemones—fission, gemmation, and sexual generation. Fission occurs either by longitudinal splitting or by the chipping off, as it were, of parts of the base, each part becoming a complete animal. Gemmation principally occurs in those genera which possess a corallum or stony skeleton. It, however, occurs in other genera very largely, the buds appearing sometimes on the disc and at others on the base. 144 NATURAL HISTORY OF In sexual reproduction the ovum, after being fer- tilized, passes through the usual stages of segmenta- tion. The young are discharged through the mouth of the parent, and may be so discharged in any stage either as ova, or, after fertilization, as morule, or, in case the entire development has been carried on in the mesenteric chambers, as fully formed young, differing from their parent only in size. The anemones live occasionally to a great age, one being named by Dr. Wilson (“ Science for All,” vol. iv. p. 156) as in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh, which was first obtained by Sir John Dalyell from the Firth of Forth in the year 1828. The development of the anemones was first fully described by Dr. Cobbold in the “ Annals of Natural History” for February, 1853. The most recent work in English dealing with the anatomy of the Malaco- dermata, is the contribution by Prof. Hertwig to the Challenger Reports. This contains a summary in English of the book published in Germany, in 1879, by the brothers Professors O. and R. Hertwig, “ Die Actinien.”’ The most recent English work dealing with the Sclerodermata is the contribution to the Challenger Reports of Mr. Moseley, and a revision of the classification of the same sub-order by Prof. Martin Duncan, published in vol. xvii. of the Journal of the Linnean Society. The “Actinologia Britannica” of the Rev. P. H. Gosse, referred to on page 14, still remains the only book in English dealing with the whole of the British Zoantharia. Recently, however, Dr. Andres has published in Italian a contribution dealing with the Malacodermata, in which all the British species of that sub-order are described. His treatise forms Part BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 145 ix. of the series issued under the direction of the Naples Zoological Station, upon the Fauna and Flora of the Gulf of Naples. CLASSIFICATION OF THE ZOANTHARIA. As just stated above, the only work in English dealing with the whole of the British Zoantharia is the “ Actinologia Britannica” of the Rev. P. H. Gosse. I have followed, so far as possible, the classifications adopted by him, bringing them, however, into con- formity with the more recent systems of Prof. Hertwig and Dr. Andres. The classification adopted by the latter is very much in accordance with that of Mr. Gosse; and as it is based chiefly upon easily ob- servable characters, I have preferred it to that of Prof. Hertwig, noticing, however, any prominent differences in the systems. The Zoantharia are divided by Milne Edwards into three sub-orders, viz.: the Matacopgermata (Actiniaria of Hertwig and Andres, and Astraacea of Gosse) ; ScueRosasica, of which there is no British species; and ScLERODERMATA (Caryophyllacea of Gosse and Madre- poraria of Moseley and Duncan). The British species of the MatacopERMATA possess no corallum, and, with the exception of the Zoanthine, are never found in colonies. The SctrropERMATA deposit a corallum. The British Matacoprrmata are divided into five families, namely, the Actinine, Edwardsine, Cerianthine, Stichodactyline, and Zoanthine. L 146 NATURAL HISTORY OF The Actinine include the sub-families Sagartide, Phellide, Actinide, Bunodide, Ilyanthide, Siphonacti- nide, and Haleampide. The family Kdwardsine con- tains the sub-family Hdwardside ; the Cerianthine, the sub-family Cerianthide ; the Stichodactyline, the sub- families Corynactide and Aurelianide ; and the Zoan- thine, the sub-family Zoanthide. The British Scturoprrmata are divided into two sections, Aporosa and Perforata. The former includes the families Turbinolide, Oculinide, and Astreide. The latter includes the family Hwpsammide. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 147 BRITISH ZOANTHARIA. Sus-Orper: MALACODERMATA (ActINIAzBIA). FAMILY I. ACTININAS (aexactintz). Malacodermata with never less than twelve septa, and having the tentacles disposed in cycles, corresponding with the internal divisions. Sus-ramity I. SaGarripa. Species possessing acontia, and having a strong meso- dermal circular muscle and numerous simple very con- tractile tentacles. Body wall smooth. Septa more than twelve in number. Principal septa only perfect, also sterile, all the remaining septa being imperfect. Genus I. Acrinotosa, De Blainville. (Aetinia, and doBos, a lobe.) Body pillar-like when extended. Body wall smooth, pierced with loopholes. Dise deeply frilled at the margin. Tentacles short, slender, not arranged in dis- tinguishable circles, scattered at the commencement, about half-breadth of the disc becoming gradually smaller, more numerous, and densely crowded as they approach the border. Mouth with a single gonidial groove, surmounted by a single pair of tubercles.— Gossz. L 2 148 NATURAL HISTORY OF 1. A. piantuus, Hillis. ‘“'The Plumose Anemone.” Plate XII. fig. 1. Actinia dianthus (Ellis, H.and 8., G.J., Dal., P.H. G., D.L., R. Q. C., Ald., Tugwell), A. senilis (Linn., Lamk.), A. Judaica (Linn., Lamk.), A. plumosa (Miill., De BL., Stew., Lamk., G.J.), A. pentapetala (Pennant), Sagartia dianthus (P. H. G.), Actinia aurantiaca (Jordan). Hab.: Very generally distributed on rocks, &., in deep water, and between tide-marks. Southport, Puffin Island (A. S. P.). Height to 6 in. when fully extended. Colours, brown, red, yellow, white. This is the only British species of this genus, and its specific characters may be gathered from the genericones. It is the most beautiful of all the anemones, and when fully expanded in a column 56 or 6 in. high and 2 or 3 broad, surmounted bya parapet which encircles the body like a moulding, and terminating in a disc divided into lobes, and perfectly fringed with tentacles, of a pure white, or fawn, or cream, or orange, or pink colour, as the variety may be, it forms an object of conspicuous interest and beauty. No one who has once seen it so expanded, can ever forget it; and as it is always a pro- minent object in public aquaria, no one need want an opportunity of seeing it. Its colour varies as stated, and is generally pure, but whatever shade the disc and body take, the lips are nearly always orange-red. Mr. Gosse classifies the varieties according to colours. (a) Brunnea, applied to those of the various shades of brown ; (b) Rubida, those of any tint of red; (c) flava, yellow, rare; (d) Sindonea, pure white. A. dianthus is avery hardy species, and may be kept in confinement for a long time. Mr. McIntosh (St. Andrew’s Fauna) BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 149 states that when very hungry it will eat seaweed. It has been stated by many observers that when once fixed it will not bear removal without injury; but this is undoubtedly incorrect. I have transferred speci- mens from one stone to another, and from one tank to another, without injury. The specific name Dianthus was given to it by Ellis from its resemblance to the carnation or pink. Couch calls it the “Sea Carnation.” This species forms a very good object for study, as, in order to attain its full distension, it has to take in a great quantity of water, and when distended the internal structure may be easily made out. Genus II. Hettactis, Thompson. (‘Hdrds, the sun, and axrtiv, a ray.) Body changeable. Body wall smooth, furnished at the upper portion with large warts or suckers. Disc concave. Tentacles numerous, and arranged in several rows. Mouth various, with two gonidial grooves. Lips finely furrowed. This is the “Soft Feathered Coralline” of Ellis (Coral., 33). It is a very graceful species, of a buff colour, and grows in tufts to a height of 2 inches or more. The cells are biserial and alternate, and each cell possesses a single spine at the top outer angle, and a small avicularium. 6. B. purpurotincta, Norman. Cellularia fastigiata (Dal.), Cellularia plumosa (G.J. Sars), Bugula fastigiata (Ald., Sars). Hab.: Loch Ryan (D. L.), St. Andrews (Mcl.), Shetland (A. M. N.), Filey (Z. H.), Wick (Peach), Menai Straits (A. S. P.). BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 231 This species has been confounded with B. pluwmosa, but it is not so graceful. It appears to take its place as a northern form. It derives its specific name from the fact that when dried it becomes purple in colour. Each cell is surmounted by a single blunt-jointed spine. The avicularia are larger than in B. plumosa. 7. B. Murrayana, Johnston. Flustra Murrayana (4. J., D. L.), Flabellaria spiralis (Gray), Avicella multispina (Van Ben.), Menipea fruti- cosa (Packard). Hab.: Scarborough (Bean), Northumberland (Miss Dale), Yorkshire and Orkney (Lieut. Thomas, R.N.), Stonehaven (Lady Keith Murray), Peterhead (C. W. P.), Leith, Newhaven (D. Z., jun.), Lamlash (7. H.). This species very much resembles in mode of growth some kinds of Flustra. It grows to about 1 inch in height, and is light coloured. The zocecia are arranged in strap-shaped branches, and 4—12 in breadth. Each cell is armed with a number of marginal spines on each side, and one blunt short spine at each of the upper angles. The ocecia are marked with radiating lines. There is a variety of this species (fruticosa) which is more slender in habit, and has narrower branches. Genus III. Beant, Johnston. Zoartum subcorneous or calcareous, erect or decum- bent. Zoccia sessile, erect, scattered, united one to the other by a slender tube, originating from the dorsal surface or from the side near the base. Aperture occupying the entire front, the margin furnished with hollow spinous processes arching over the opening; 232 NATURAL HISTORY OF mouth terminal. Oacia and Avicularia wanting.— f. H; B. mrraBiuis, Johnston. Plate XVIII. fig. 5. Hab.: Scarborough (Bean), Salcombe, Torbay, Lam- lash, Isle of Man, Channel Islands (7. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly), Peterhead (C. W. P.), Ilfracombe (P. H.G.). ZLocecia “ boat-shaped,”” 7—10 spines on each side of the aperture, cells connected by a slender tube. This is a small and beautiful species. The origin of its generic name is as follows. Dr. Johnston says: “This remarkable genus was discovered by Mr. William Bean, of Scarborough. I felt much gratified in asso- ciating it with his name. He is well known to natu- ralists generally by his multitudinous discoveries in British zoology, recent and fossil.” Dr. Landsborough, quoting from Mrs. Gaity, de- scribes the cells as resembling beetles that have lost their heads. The polypide has 20 tentacles, FAMILY V. NOTAMIDAi. Zoecia in pairs, each pair arising by tubular pro- longations from the pair neat but one below it; at each bifurcation a new series of cells intercalated into the branches.—T. H. Genus I. Noramia, Fleming. Zoarium consisting of a creeping tubular stem and erect shoots. Zoccia united laterally in pairs; above each pair two stemmed avicularia, originating, one on each side, from the inferior tubular prolongation of one of the cells immediately above. Oecia none.— AMA ee BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 233 N. sursaria, Linn. Plate XIX. fig. 1. Sertularia bursaria (Linn., Berk., Stew.), S. bursa (Turt.), Cellularia bursaria (Pall., Hillis), Cellaria bur- saria (ZH. and S., Lamk.), Dynamena bursaria (Lame., De B.), Gemicellaria bursaria (De Bl., D. L.), Epistomia bursaria (Gray). Hab.: Isle of Wight (Busk), Swanage (fincks), Hastings (Kingsley). This species derives its specific name from the re- semblance of its cells to the pods of the ‘ Shepherd’s Purse,” from which Ellis (“ Corallines,” 41) called it the “ Shepherd’s Purse Coralline.” His description, which is as follows, is accurate and interesting : ‘ This most beautiful pearl-coloured Coralline adheres by small tubes to fuci, from whence it changes into flat cells; each single cell, like the bracket of a shelf, broad at top and narrow at bottom. These are placed back to back in pairs one above another on an ex- tremely slender tube, which seems to run through the middle of the branches of the whole coralline. The cells are open at the top. Some of them have black spots in them, and from the top of many of them a figure seems to issue out like a short tobacco-pipe, the small end of which seems to be inserted in the tube that passes through the middle of the whole. The cells in pairs are thought by some to have the appearance of the small pods of the Shepherd’s Purse; by others, the shape of the seed vessels of Veronica or speed- well.” This tobacco-pipe appendage alluded to is, of course, the avicularium. 234 NATURAL HISTORY OF FAMILY VI. CELLARIDAL. (Cella, a cell.) Zoecia usually rhomboidal or hexangular, disposed in series round an imaginary axis, so as to form cylin- drical shoots. Zoarium erect, calcareous, dichotomously branched.—T. H. Genus J. Crntarta, Lamowrouz (in part). Cella, a cell. Zoarium jointed at intervals, the internodes con- nected by flexible horny tubes. Zowcia depressed in front, and surrounded by a raised border, disposed in quincunx. Avicularia immersed, irregularly distributed, situated above a cell, or occupying the place of one. Occia immersed.—T. H. 1, C. ristutosa, Linn. Plate XVIII. fig. 6. Cellaria salicornia (Lame., Lamk., Stark, Bosc, De B., D’Orb.), C. farciminoides (H. and S.), Eischara fistulosa (Linn.), Cellularia salicornia (Pall.), Tubularia fistulosa (Linn., Berk., Turt., Stew.), Flustra fistulosa (Linn.), Salicornaria salicornia (Cuvier), Farcimia fistulosa (Flem., G. J.), Salicornaria fistulosa (Templeton), 8. dichotoma (Schweigger), Farcimia salicornia (G. J., R. Q. C.), Salicornaria farciminoides (Busk, Reuss, G.J., McA., D. L:). Hab.: South Cornwall (R. Q. C.), South Devon (T. H.), Northumberland (Ald.), Weymouth (A. 8. P.), St. Andrew’s (McI.), Shetland (Norman). The popular name of this zoophyte is the “ Bugle Coralline,” which was given to it by Ellis (Corall., 46), who says: ‘This beautiful stony coralline proceeds from membranaceous tubes, which enter into and form cylindrical joints composed of stony lozenge-shaped BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 235 cells, with a proper entrance to each. These surround the whole surface of the coralline.” The zoophyte grows to the height of 3 inches, and is white in colour. It is very easily distinguishable by reason of its jointed character and the regular lozenge- shaped cells all over its surface. 2. C. stnuvosa, Hassall. Farcimia sinuosa (Hassall), F. spathulosa (Hassall), Salicornaria sinuosa (G.J., Busk, Ald., D.D., McA.), F. salicornia (2. Q. C. in part), 8. farciminoides (Busk, var.). Hab.: Belfast and Dublin Bay (Thompson), South Devon, Cornwall, Brixham (7. H.), Northumberland (Ald.), Shetland (Norman). This species grows to a height of 3 or 4 inches. It very much resembles the preceding in appearance, but is distinguished by its stouter growth and larger size, 3. C. Jonnsoni, Bush. Nellia Johnsoni (Busk), Salicornaria Johnsoni (Busk, MeA.). Hab.: Shetland (Norman). White. Growing to 1} in. Resembles C. fistulosa, but is more slender, and has the avicularia occupying the place of cells. FAMILY VII. FLUSTRIDA. Zoarium corneous and flexible, expanded, foliaceous, erect. Zowcia contiquous, multiserial. Avicularia’ usually of a very simple type.—T. H. Genus Fuusrra, Linn. (A.-S. Flustrian, to weave.) Zoarium erect, frondose. Zowcia disposed in a single 236 NATURAL HISTORY OF layer, or in two layers united by the dorsal surfaces, more or less quadrangular or linguiform, with a raised margin, the apertwre occupying the whole or a con- siderable portion of the front of the cell, and closed in by a membranous covering. Occia immersed.—T. H Zocecia in two layers. 1. F. routacna, Linn. Plate XIX. fig. 2. Porus cervinus (Jussiew), Hschara foliacea (Linn., Pall., Moil.). Hab. : Common. This common zoophyte is popularly called the “ Broad-leaved Hornwrack.” It grows in fronds somewhat resembling the fronds of algee, to a height of 4 or 5 inches. The colour is brown, and it possesses a peculiar odour, which has been variously described. Ellis considers it fishy. Grant, Couch, and Hincks liken it to that of the violet; Dr. Landsborough to that of Verbena; and Pallas to that of orange. Hooker says, “ For curiosity and beauty I have not, among all the plants or vegetables I have yet observed, seen any one comparable to this seaweed ”’ (!). The zoarium consists of a number of zocecia, placed side by side, extending along both sides of the fronds, which spread out in a palmate form, and are deeply divided into narrow and broad segments, which are often again subdivided towards the extremities. ‘The segments are narrowed at the base, and are generally rounded at the top. Hach cell has two spines at each side of the semicircular top. The avicularia are irre- gularly distributed between the cells. 2. F. papyracea, Ellis and Solander. Plate XIX, fig. 3, we BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 237 Flustra chartacea (Turt., Stew., Bosc, Lame., R.Q.C., G. J., D. L.), Chartella papyracea (Gray). Hab.: Coast of Sussex (Hillis), Brighton (Lister), Plymouth, Ilfracombe (7’. H.). This species is described by Ellis and Solander (N.H.Z.,13), under the name of the “ Paper Sea Mat,” as like paper with cells on both sides, having the tops of its branches formed like the edge of anaxe. This sea mat is of a slender and delicate texture, like thin semi-transparent paper of a very light straw colour.”’ F’. papyracea is much smaller and more delicate than the preceding species, growing to the height of about 13 inches. The cells have one spine at each corner of the upper end. 3. F. securirrons, Pallas. Eschara foliacea 8 (Linn.), E. securifrons (Pall.), Flustra truncata (Linn., Lamk., Mill., EZ. and 8., Lame., Flem., G.J., Grant, Hogg, R.Q.C., D.L., McA.), F. papyracea (Dal.), Chartella securifrons (Gray), F. tron- quée (De B.). Hab.: Common on the shores of Scotland and northern shores of England. This species grows to a height of 4 or 5 inches, and is as much as 3 inches in breadth. It is divided into a large number of narrow segments, from the edges of which “leaflets” often spring. The cells are oblong, and have no spines. Ellis gave it the name of the “ Narrow-leaved Hornwrack,” to distinguish it from EF. foliacea. 4, F. Barirrr, Busk. Hab. : Shetland (Norman). “This species has large rectangular cells, with no spines. When dry it has a varnished appearance.” 238 NATURAL HISTORY OF Zocecia on one side only. 5. F. carpasea, EH. and 8. Plate XIX. fig. 4. Carbasea papyracea (Gray), C. papyrea (Busk, Ald., McA.), F. voile (De B.), F. papyrea (Smitt), Semiflustra carbasea (D’Orb.). Hab.: Aberdeen (Skene), Durham coast (Hogg), Berwick coast (G.J.), Stonehaven (Lady Keith Murray), Newhaven (D. L.,jun.), Filey (7. H.). This species, first described by Ellis and Solander (N. H. Z., 14) under the name of the “ Lawn Sea Mat,” is easily distinguished from the other Flustre by having cells on one side only, which cells are larger than in any of the other species, and are egg-shaped at the top, and without spines. It grows to a height of 2 or 3 inches, and is broad, and of a yellowish-brown colour. Dr. Grant has calculated that “a common specimen of this zoophyte contains more than 18,000 cells.” FAMILY VIII. MEMBRANIPORIDA. Zoarium calcareous or membrano-calcareous, incrust- ing (so far as British species are concerned). Locecia forming an irregular continuous expansion, or in linear series, with raised margins, and more or less membrana- ceous in front.—T. H. Genus I. Mempranipora, De Blainville. Zoarium incrusting. Zoecia quincuncial, or irregu- larly disposed, occasionally in linear series; margins raised; front depressed, wholly or in part membrana- ceous.—T’. H. With a membranous front wall. 1. M. Lacrorxi, Audouin. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 239 Flustra Lacroixii (Savigny), F. distans (Hassall), F. Peachii (2. Q. C.), Membranipora reticulum (Reuss), Biflustra Lacroixii (Smitt), Conopeum reticulum (Gray). Hab.: Cornwall, South Devon, Ramsay (7. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly), Tynemouth (Ald.). This species spreads in colonies over shells and stones. The cells are oval in shape, with thick margins, placed in somewhat irregular rows, and usually having two triangular opening’s in the crust of the zoarium between each cell and the one below it. The cells are generally armed with spines, which sometimes number two or three stout ones, and at other times are as many as ten or a dozen, in which case they are shorter and more slender. 2. M. monostacuys, Busk. F, distans (D. L.). Hab.: Suffolk coast (Busk), Ilfracombe (T. H.), Yar- mouth (Wigham), Hastings (Miss Jelly). This species assumes different appearances according to the age of the colony, at first branching in single series, and ultimately increasing in number of rows so as to have the regular colonial appearance. The zocecia are ovate, and have a single erect spine at the bottom of each cell, and also one on each side near the top ; sometimes there is a large and varying number (up to 18) of spines distributed round the margin. 3. M. cATENULARIA, Jameson. Tubipora catenularia (Jameson), T.catenulata (Stew.), Hippothoa catenularia (ilem., Busk, G. J., BR. Q. C., D. L., McA.), H. Elliotes (Gray), Pyrifora ramosa (D’Orb.). Hab.: Generally distributed (in deep water). This species has been called the ‘‘ Beaded Coralline,” 240 NATURAL HISTORY QF and resembles the preceding in mode of growth— usually extending in single linear series. ‘* The zocecia are connected like a string of bugles; the cells are oval, but widest and roundest at the top.”—Johnston. Dr. Landsborough, in describing a specimen obtained by him, says that it covered about three inches of a shell in length, and about an inch and a half in breadth. The cells are sometimes marked with parallel lines. 4, M. pitosa, Linn. Plate XIX. fig. 6. Flustra pilosa (Linn., H. and S., Lamk., Lame., Grant, Lister, Mill., Bosc, Flem., G. J., De B.), Eschara pilosa (Pall., Moll.), Flustra dentata (H. and S., Mill., Lamk., Lamz., Bosc, De B.), F. lineata (Esper), Membranipora stellata (Thompson), Annulipora pilosa (Gray), A. den- tata (Gray), Reptelectrina pilosa (D’Orb.), R. dentata (D’Orb.). Hab.: Very common. This very common but very beautiful zoophyte is the “Irregular Spongy Foliaceous Coralline ” of Ellis (Cor., 73), who refers to it as “this common sea insect’s cell”’ In appearance it often seems to cover the fronds of algze with a silver incrustation, and under the lens the individual cells are seen to be most curiously wrought. The cells are placed either side by side or alternately, and are long and dotted all over with oval discs. A long spine usually proceeds from just below the orifice of each cell, which is also guarded by from 4—12 marginal spines sometimes bending over the cell. The zooids of this species possess a curious interten- tacular organ, which is oblong, and placed between the base of two of the tentacles, and attached to the ten- tacular ring. It is lined and surmounted with cilia. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 241 Mr. Hincks has studied the purpose of this organ, and, in his opinion, considers that “at certain seasons it is the channel through which cercarie are ejected from the perigastric cavity. The connection proved to exist between this organ and the cercarie—which must be regarded as spermatozoic bodies—may be accepted as conclusive evidence that it is subservient in some way to the function of generation.” 5. M. mempranacea, Linn. Plate XIX. fig. 5. Flustra membranacea (Linn., Mill., H. and S., Flem., Tame., R.Q.C., D.L., G. J), F. telacea (Lamk.), Reptoflustra telacea (D’Orb.). Hab.: Common. This zoophyte is commonly found spreading in gauze- like areas over the fronds of fuci. It spreads to a remarkable extent. Dr. Landsborough and Dr. John- ston have both seen specimens as much as 5 feet in length, with a breadth of 8 inches; and the former observer calculated that “‘ this web of silvery lace had been the work and the habitation of above two millions of industrious and, we doubt not, happy inmates.”’ The cells are quadrangular and oblong, with a blunt spine at each upper angle. On some of the cells of this species occasionally occur long tower-like transparent processes or cells, which have been considered by some as ovicells, and by others as abnormal growths. This is the “ Chagrin (Shagreen) Sea Mat” of Hllis (Ellis and Solander, N. H. Z., 18). 6. M. nexacona, Busk. Flustra coriacea (G.J., D. L.). Hab.: Isle of Man (forbes), Peterhead (Peach), Coast of Devon (Miss Cutler). Rare. R 242 NATURAL HISTORY OF “The cells are broadly elliptical or hexagonal, with generally two hollow tubercles on the posterior angle of the aperture,” Landsborough. 7. M. tingata, Tinn. Plate XX. fig. 2. Flustra lineata (Linn., Fabr., Mill., Lama., Jameson, De B., G.J., D. L.), Callopora lineata (Gray), Repte- lectrina lineata (D’Orb.). Hab. : Common on rocks, shells, and seaweed. This species spreads in irregularly circular patches. The cells are oval, protected by 6—12 spines, most of which bend across the cell so as almost to meet. The ovicels are large and pearly, and generally accompanied by an avicularium. 8. M. craticuta, Alder. Flustra lineata (Rf. Q. C.). Hab.: Rare. Northumberland (Ald.), Isle of Man, Oban (TZ. H.), Wick, Cornwall (C. W. P.). The cells are oval and regularly arranged. Hach cell is protected by about 13 closely-set, glistenmg spines, the two upper ones being of great length. 9. M. spintrera, Johnston. Flustra spinifera (G. J.). Hab.: Northumberland and Durham (Ald.), Isle of Man, Devon (7. H.), St. Andrews (Mcl.). This species is distinguished from M. limeata by its numerous long stout spines (14—18), and its stalked avicularium. 10. M. riustroipes, Hincks. Hab.: Guernsey, Cornwall, South Devon (2. H.), Birterbay Bay (Norman). Described by Mr. Hincks in the Annals of N. H., ser. 4, xx. 213. Mr. Hincks considers this species as transitional BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 243 between the Flustre and the regular species of Mem- branipore. The cells are large, closely packed and oval, armed with about a dozen large spines incurved. Oval avicularia are scattered amongst the cells as in Flustra. 11. M. piscreta, Hincks. Hab.: South Devon, Guernsey (Hincks), This species was described by Mr. Hincks in the Annals of N. H., ser. 3, ix. 200. From the description and figure of this species (“ British Marine Polyzoa,” plate xix. figs. 8, 9), the cells, which are small, appear to be very curious and beautiful; “ the margin being cut into about 20 lobes, supporting as many delicate sharply pointed spines, which bend slightly inwards.” 12. M. curvirostris, Hincks. Hab.: In deep waters off Polperro. Described by Mr, Hincks in the same publication as the last species. It possesses “large avicularia, with curved and pointed mandibles directed upwards.” 13. M. untcornis, Fleming. Flustra unicornis (Flem., De B.), Membranipora membranacea, in part (G.J., D. L.). Hab.: Common. Northumberland and Durham (Ald.), St. Andrews (McI.), Ayrshire coast (D. L.), Dogger Bank (7. H.). This species forms extensive coarse gauze-like crusts of a whitish colour. The cells are large and oval, with two spines, one towards the upper part of each side. There is a large avicularium borne at the summit of each ovicel. 14, M. Doumerini, Audouin. R 2 244, NATURAL HISTORY OF Flustra Dumerilii (Audowin), M. Pisa (Busk), M. Pouilletii (Ald., Busk, McA.). Hab.: As last species. Also Isle of Man, Ilfracombe, Cornwall (Hincks). This species is allied to the preceding, but is more delicate in texture, and has a small avicularium and strongly granulated ovicels. The zocecia bear 4—6 spines. 15. M. souipuna, Alder and Hincks. Hab.: Guernsey (7. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly). This species has small oval cells, with beaded margins and small globular prominences between the cells, each of which has four spines on its upper margin. Described in the Proceedings of the Dublin Univ. Zool. and Botan. Association, i, part i. 75. 16. M. avrita, Hincks. Hab.: Cornwall and Devon (7. H.), Northumberland (Ald.). Described by Mr. Hincks in the Annals of Nat. Hist., ser. 4, xx. 213. This species is distinguished by the regular quin- cuncial arrangement of the zocecia, which are ovate, with plain margins. It greatly resembles IZ. Flemingi. The adult cells are armed with one long spine at the side, and two raised avicularia. 17. M. meets, Hincks. Hab.: Scotland, West Coast, Brixham (7. #.). This species has large “pyriform” cells without spines or avicularia, and is considered by Mr. Busk as “an unarmed variety of M. Flemingi ;” but Mr. Hincks considers it a separate species. The margins of the zocecia are incurved and granulated. It is found at a depth of 40—60 fathoms. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 245 With a calcareous lamina. 18. M. Freminei, Busk. Plate XX. fig. 1. Flustra membranacea (Miéll., Fabr.), F. tuberculata (G.JS., R. Q.0.), Amphiblestrum membranaceum (Gray). Hab.: Common. In this species the zocecia are ovate, deep, and ex- tended beneath the apparent surface. The aperture is trifoliate, and each cell has 6—8 spines, one of which in the centre of the margin is jointed to a tubular base, and is long, and ‘bears no small resemblance to the blade of a scimitar.” The appearance of the zoophyte, with its array of sword-like spines guarding each cell, is very curious. In exposed situations these long spines are either not produced or are very soon rubbed off. 19. M. cornicera, Bush. Hab.: Shetland (A. MW. N.). This is a rare species from deep water. The zocecia are lozenge-shoped, with 6 spines, the lowest pair of which are forked. Large oblong avicularia are dis- tributed amongst the cells. 20. M. Rossetti, Audouin. Flustra Rossellu (Aud., Savigny). Hab.: Shetland (A.M. N.), Isle of Man, Torbay (T. H.), Peterhead (C. W. P.). This species forms brown crusts on shells and stones. There are no avicularia, and the zocecia are oval, pointed below with raised and finely beaded margins. 21. M. trtrotium, 8S. Wood. Flustra trifolium (SS. Wood), Membranipora solida (Packard), M. sacculata (A. M. N.). Hab.: Shetland (A. M. N.), Wick (C. W. P.). This species much resembles the preceding. The 24.6 NATURAL HISTORY OF colonies are of a pale olive-green or reddish-brown colour. It is found at a depth of 40—170 fathoms. 22. M. minax, Bush. Hab.: Shetland (A. UZ. W.). Described by Mr. Busk in the Q. J. M.S., viii. (1860), 125. The cell is pyriform, with two long spines on each side near the top, and a large pointed avicularium on the margin at the bottom of the cell. 23. M. noputosa, Hincks. Hab.: South Devon, Brixham (Hincks). This species is found on shells at a depth of 50 fathoms and over. The cells are oval, without spines or any ornamentation. Below each is a prominent boss or projection. Genus II. Mzcarora, Hincks. (uéyas, large, and Topos, an opening.) Zoarium incrusting. Zocecia with a depressed area in front, surrounded by a raised margin, and partially closed in by a calcareous lamina. Aperture trifoliate, the lower portion filled in by a horny plate, on which the opercular valve works.—T. H. 1. M. rincens, Busk. Lepralia ringens (Busk, A. Wl. N.). Hab.: Shetland. 80—170 fathoms (A. WU. N.). This species grows in small patches. The cells are large and ovate, with “an inclosed area occupying the upper portion of the front. surface.” There are about 6 spines on the upper margin, and there is a tall spine on the side of the cell. It was described by Mr. Busk in the Q. J. M. &., iv. (1856), 308. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 247 FAMILY IX. MICROPORIDA. Zoecia with the front wall whole, calcareous ; margins elevated.—T. H. Genus I. Micropora, Gray. (xpos, small.) Zoarium incrusting. Zocecia with prominent raised margins; front depressed, wholly calcareous; orifice semicircular or suborbicular, enclosed by a calcareous border.—T. H. 1. M. cortacua, Hsper. Plate XX. fig. 3. Flustra coriacea (Hsp., D. L.), Discopora coriacea (Lamk.), Membranipora coriacea (Bush, McA.). Hab.: Shetland (4. M. N.), Cornwall, Guernsey (T. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly), Aberdeenshire (C. W.P.), Isle of Man (Forbes). | The cells in this species are broad with thickened margins, those at the sides terminating in a distinct knob at the top. The orifice is small and semicircular, with a straight lower margin. The whole of the cell is dotted with small punctures. The appearance of each cell is very suggestive of a mummy. 2. M. compianata, Norman. Lepralia complanata (A. IW. N.), Membranipora Smitti (Manzoni). Described by Mr. Norman in the Annals of Nat. Hist., January, 1864, page 84, from specimens without label in Mr. Barlee’s collection. Genus II. Srecanoporetta, Smitt. (oteyavos, covered, porella, a little opening.) Zoariwm incrusting or (occasionally) rising into folia- ceous expansions. Zowcia with the external characters 248 NATURAL HISTORY OF of Micropora, but having an inner chamber occupying the whole of the cavity below, and above narrowed into a tubular passage which either communicates directly with the orifice or opens into a second chamber imme- diately beneath it.—T. H. 8. Smirri. Membranipora andigavensis (Bush). This species was discovered by Mr. Peach on the - tube of a Serpula off the Cornish coast. The zocecia resemble those of Micropora, but have an inner chamber occupying most of the cavity, and communicating with the orifice by a tubular passage. The avicularia are nearly as large in area as the zocecia, and have a prominent dark horn-coloured mandible. Genus III. Srrosunta, Hincks. (Setosa, bristly.) Zoarium incrusting. Zoccia with raised margins ; front depressed and wholly calcareous. Apertwre semi- circular. Vibracular cells alternating with the zocecia throughout the colony. Vibraculwm slender and seti- form.—T’. H. S. voLNERATA, Bush. Membranipora vulnerata (Bush). Hab.: Shetland, on the very smallest stones at a depth of 80—110 fathoms (A. I. N.). The cells are oval, with a raised smooth margin. A little above each cell is a long bristle or vibraculum, whence the generic name is derived. Described by Mr. Busk in the Q. J. M. 8., vii. 124, and by Mr. Hincks in the Ann. and Mag. N. H., Dec., 1877, and July, 1880. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 249 FAMILY X. CRIBRILINIDA. Zoarium adnate, forming an indefinite crust, or erect. Zoecia having the front wall—more or less—fissured, or traversed by radiating furrows.—T. H. Genus I. Crrprinina, Gray. (Cribrum, a sieve.) Zoarium incrusting. Zoccta contiguous, having the front’ more or less occupied by transverse or radiating punctured furrows; orifice semicircular or suborbicular. —T.H. 1. C. raprata, Moll. Eschara radiata (Joll.), Lepralia innominata (2. Q. C., D.L., G.J., Busk, T. H., Manzoni), L. scripta, L. pretiosa, L. calomorpha (feuss), Reptescharella pyg- mea (D’Orb.), C. innominata (Smitt), L. annulata (Heller, Manzoni). Hab.: Common.on South and South-West Coasts, and to the West Coast of Scotland. “The cells are white, ovate, and sometimes almost orbicular, and when the ribs diverge from a central umbo, each cell is like a pecten in miniature.” —Lands- borough. Some varieties have five or six spines. The cell, like that of many other Polyzoa, is richly sculptured, a large number of ribs or ridges branching towards the margin from a central line, point, or pro- jection, the interspaces being often decorated by punc- tures and dots. The appearance of the colonies is subject to considerable variation, being sometimes deli- cate and gauze-like, at others coarse and dull in colour. 2. C. puncrata, Hassall. Plate XX. fig. 4. Lepralia punctata (Hassall, Busk, G. J, D. L.), Escharipora punctata (Smitt). 250 NATURAL HISTORY OF Hab.: Widely distributed on rocks and algze between tide marks. . The young cells are whitish, becoming grey and coarse when old. The cells vary considerably in ap- pearance, being sometimes elongated and decorated with marginal tubercles and cross ribs, at other times without ribs or tubercles ; sometimes with a number of ridges proceeding from a central raised area, at other times almost plain; sometimes with prominent spines, at others with inconspicuous ones. The cells are always more or less dotted with perforations, and there is usually an avicularium on each side of the orifice. 3. C. ANNULATA, Fabricius. Cellepora annulata (fabr.), Lepralia annulata (Busk, G.J., D. L.), Escharipora annulata (Smitt). Hab.: Shetland (A. UW. N.), Cumbraes (D. L.), Oban (7. H.), St. Andrews (MclI.), Cornwall (T. Ty. This species is called by its earliest discoverer, “ pulcherrima et perfectissima hac omnium visarum.” Dr. Landsborough calls it a very pretty species, and describes each cell as being like a little barrel closely hooped, and having transverse rows of perforations betwixt the hoops. There is often a median line from the top to the bottom of the cell. The colour in general is a pale brownish-red. There are often three or four spines in the upper margin of the cell. 4, C. FIGULARIS, Johnston. Lepralia figularis (G4. J., D. L., T. H., Gray, Busk), Escharipora figularis (Simitt). Hab.: Cornwall (C. W. P.), Guernsey (7. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly). BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 20k The zocecia in this species somewhat resemble those of the preceding, but they have a row of small tuber- cles just inside the margin, a tubercle terminating each of the cross ribs. The cells are barrel-shaped. 5. C. Garryz, Busk. Plate XX. fig. 5. Lepralia Gattyee (Busk, D. L.), Lepralia Steindach- neri (Heller). Hab.: Sidmouth (Mrs. Gatty), Guernsey (7. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly). In Dr. Landsborough’s “ Popular History of British Zoophytes ” is the following description by its dis- coverer, Mrs. Gatty :—“ The centre of each cell is ornamented with a rich pattern, and this is a very characteristic feature. At the foot of each of the five spines that surround the mouth or aperture is a black ring, and below the mouth there is on each side a single fine spine, which may be compared, perhaps, to a cat’s whisker (a vibraculum). In the middle of all there is a knob or projection (more or less obvious in different individuals), and round this “ umbo-like” projection there is a circle of small dots or punctures. From this circle emanate rays or raised lines, between each of which there is to be found a dot or puncture, larger in size than those of the other circle. ‘These rays and stars are alternate, and so form a circle outside the circle that surrounds the umbo.” Genus IJ. Mermpraniporenia, Smitt. Zoarium incrusting, or rising into free, foliaceous expansions, with a single layer of cells. Zowcia closed in front by a number of flattened calcareous ribs more or less consolidated.—T. H. 1. M. nitipa, Johnston. Plate XX, fig. 6. 252 NATURAL HISTORY OF Cellepora nitida (Lamk., Fabr.), Escharoides nitida (M. Edw.), Berenicea nitida (Flem.), Lepralia nitida (G. J., R. Q. C., D. L., Busk, T.H., Simitt), Bérénice brillante (De B.), Membranipora nitida (Smitt). Hab.: Isle of Man (Forbes), Devonshire (2. H.), Cornwall (C. W. P.), Ayrshire, Ross-shire coast (D. L.), Shetland (A. JZ N.), Berwick (G. J.). This is a beautiful little species. “It is hke a miniature human thorax; the cross pieces representing the ribs, and the broad band into which these are inserted being analogous to a sternum.”—Hassall. “ We might suppose it the thorax of a pretty little fairy.”—Landsborough. The colonies have a shining appearance, in fact an almost metallic lustre. 2. M. metotontaa, Busk. Lepralia melolontha (Busk, D. L.), Lepralia nitida (var. G.J.). Hab.: Thames Estuary (Lieut. Thomas), East Coast (Mrs. Gatty). This species was at first thought to be a variety of the preceding, but it has been separated from it. It derives its specific name from the fact, that many of the cells resemble a cockchafer or tailed beetle, in having a strong spine turning up almost at right angles from the bottom. This species grows in a branched manner, and not in alternate rows, as in M. nitida. Dr. Johnston describes it as “ branched in a fine dendritic manner, like Stomatopora dilatans.” x FAMILY XI. MICROPORELLIDA. Zocecia adnate and incrusting, or forming erect and foliated or dendroid zoaria ; orifice more or less semi- BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. Zoe circular, with the lower margin entire; w semilunate or circular pore on the front wall.—T. H. Genus I. Micrororrtia, Hincks. (wixpos, small, and Topos.) Zoarium incrusting. Zocecia with a semicircular aperture, the lower margin entire, and a semilunate or circular pore below it.—T. H. 1. M. ciara, Pallas. Plate XX. fig. 7. Kschara ciliata 8 (Pall.), Cellepora ciliata (Linn., Fabr., Bosc, Lame.), Eschara vulgaris 8 (Moll.), Le- pralia ciliata (G. J., D. L., R. Q. C., Busk), L. insignis (Hassall), L. personata (Lusk), L. lunata (Macgillivray), L. utriculus (Manzoni), Flustra Genisii (Aud., Savigny), Hscharina vulgaris (part) (JZ. Hdw.), Reptoporellina subvulgaris (D’Orb.), Cellepora crenilabris (Reuss), C. pleuropora (feuss), Porina ciliata (Smitt), Porellina ciliata (Smitt). Hab.: Generally distributed, on sea weeds, shells, and stones. Mr. Couch calls this the “ branched celle- pore.” It assumes a variety of forms. The cells are ovate, and frosted, the aperture is arched with a straight lower margin and is armed with five to seven spines. This, along with the other species of this genus, is dis- tinguished by what is called a median pore or opening in the front wall of each cell probably having respiratory functions. In the present species the median pore is often borne on a mucro or knob. The avicularia are large and often curiously modified in structure ; four distinct types of avicularia being recognized by Mr. Hincks (A. M. N. H., ix. 25). 2. M.-Matusi, Audowin. Cellepora Malusii (Aud., Savigny), Cellepora Macry 254 NATURAL HISTORY OF (W. Thompson), Lepralia biforis (G. J., D. 0.), L. Malusii (Busk, Heller, Manzoni), L. thyreophora (Busk), Herentia biforis (Gray), Escharina cornuta (D’Orb.), Reptoporina Malusii and R. hexagona (D’Orb.), Porina Malusii (Smitt). Hab.: Strangford Lough (Thompson), Larne (Patter- son), Ayrshire Coast (D. L.), Sidmouth (Mrs. Gatty), Wick (C. W. P.), Guernsey, South Devon, Cornwall, Isle of Man (2. H.). This is a well-marked species. The cells are ovate and glistening, punctured except in the centre. The orifice is armed with three or four spines. The median pore is half-moon shaped, very large, and ‘‘ guarded with delicate teeth so as to act as a sieve or strainer.” 3. M. mpressa, Audouin. Plate XX. fig. 8. Flustra impressa (Aud., Savigny), Lepralia granifera (G. J., Busk, D. L., Ald.), L. pyriformis (Busk). Hab.: Holy Island, Berwick Bay (G. J.), Cornwall (OC. W. P.), Saltcoats (D. L.), Shetland (A. 1, N.), Ifra- combe, South Devon, Isle of Man (7. H.). The following notes by Mrs. Gatty describe this species :—* The typical forms of M. impressa (L. grani- fera, Johnston) may be considered to lie between two extremes. One extreme variety lies flat to the sea- weed, and is cut into a finely-marked diamond pattern, round the four sides of which are a row of dots or punctures. There is also an opening below the mouth” (the median pore, which is circular in this species). “The pure transparency of the cell in its young con- dition—varied by a thicker line which marks out its diamond shape, and in which lie the row of dots— makes it a very pretty object. It is so glassy in texture that the colour of the red phyllophora can be BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 250 distinguished through the cells. As it advances in age the opening below the mouth looks as if it was on a raised knob, and the flat appearance of the cell is gone. The other extreme form is one in which the side horns and the heavy knob are so prominent as to be the leading features of the species. In modified instances the front protuberance is lower and the horns less distinct.” | 4, M. viotacka, Johnston. Lepralia violacea (G. J., Busk, Manzoni, D. L.), U. plagiopora (Busk), L. diversipora (feuss), Porina violacea (Smitt), P. plagiopora (Smitt). Hab. : Isle of Man (Forbes), Cornish Coast (C. W. P.), Hastings (Miss Jelly), Brixham, Torbay, Guernsey CP. Ez.) This species forms irregular crusts of a violet or cream colour on shells, stones, &c. The cells are ovate, with arough granular surface, depressed in the middle, where there is a large circular median pore. There is also an avicularium. ‘The old cells lose their beauty and become “almost confluent of a dead whitish colour, flattish and sometimes thickly perforated’ In a specimen now before me the perforations are extremely large. Gunus II. Drrorvta, Hincks. (dis, double.) Zocecia with the orifice arched and expanded above, contracted below, and slightly constricted by two lateral projections (horseshoe-shaped), lower margin straight; a semilunate pore on the front wall. Avicu- laria.—T. H. 1. D. verrucosa, Peach. Eschara verrucosa (C. W. P.), H. lunaris (Waters). 256 NATURAL HISTORY OF Hab.: Lautivet Bay, Cornwall (C. W. P.). This rare species is distinguished by its dendroid manner of growth. It is of a light brown colour. The branches are cylindrical; the cells become so incrusted that in the older specimens sometimes only the orifice is visible. Genus III. Cuorizorora. (ywpifm, to separate.) Zocecia more or less distant, connected by a tubular network; the orifice semicircular, with the inferior margin entire ; the special pore wanting.—T. H. 1. C. Bronentarti, Audowin. Plate XX. fig. 9. Flustra Brongniartii (Aud., Savigny), Lepralia tenuis (Hassall, G. J., D. L.), L. assimilis (G. J., D. L.), L. Jacotini (Gray), L. Brongniartii (Busk, Ald., Heller), Mollia tuberculata (D’Orb.), M. Brongniartii (D’Orb.), L. capitata (Reuss). Hab.: Dublin Bay (Hassall), Cornwall (C. W. P.), Sidmouth (Mrs. Gatty), Lamlash (D. L.), Ilfracombe, Isle of Man (T. H.), Hastings (Miss Jelly), Sana Island (Hyndman), Shetland (4. I. N.), Filey (A. S. P.). The cells in this species are long in proportion to their breadth. The surface is sometimes smooth and at others furrowed. ‘The cells are often separated by expansions of the crust which are perforated by a series of apertures or spaces covered with tubercles. There is an avicularium at the top of each. The cells are connected with each other by tubes. In forms where the cells are close together, they appear to be surrounded by a line of punctures or apertures. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 257 FAMILY XII. PORINIDA, D’Orbigny. Zoarium incrusting, or erect and ramified. Zocecia with a raised tubular or subtubular orifice, and frequently a special pore on the front wall.—T. H. Genus I. Portna, D’Orbigny. Zocecia tubular or subtubular above, with a terminal circular orifice; a median pore on the front wall. Zoarium (in the British species) incrusting, or erect and ramose.—T. H. (a) Zoophyte erect, branching. 1. P. Borzatis, Busk. Pustulipora gracilis (Sars), Onchopora borealis (Busk, McA.), Quadricellaria gracilis (Sars., Ald.), Anarthro- pora borealis (Smitt), Tessaradoma gracile (A. M. N.), T. boreale (Smitt). Hab.: Shetland (A. . N.). On stems of Tubularice and Sertularie, from deep water. Height 1—2 in. This species is white and dichotomously branched. “The cells are ovate, arranged in four longitudinal rows alternating regularly with each other, so that the opposite cells are on the same level.” Hach cell has a row of pores round its margin, and one or more small circular avicularia. (b) Zoophyte incrusting. 2, P. ruputosa, Norman. Lepralia tubulosa (A. I. N., T. H.), Anarthropora monodox forma minuscula (Smitt), Cylindroporella tubulosa (7. H.). Hab.: Shetland (A. I. N.), Wick (C. W. P.). S 258 NATURAL HISTORY OF The cells are arranged in rows. They are narrow, with a circular orifice terminating a long tubular neck. There is a large tubular pore a little distance below the orifice. The cells are dotted with minute star- shaped pores. Genus II. Crtierorz.a, Gray. Zocecia suberect, anterior extremity tubular and free, with a terminal circular orifice. No special pores. ~ Zoarium incrusting.—T. H. 1. C. nepratorpes, Norman. 2. C. pyamaa, Norman. These species are very minuté, and were both found in very deep water at Shetland by the Rev. A. M. Norman, who described the former in the Q. J. M. 8S. (N.S.), viii., 222, and the latter in the Report of the Brit. Ass., 1868, p. 308. Genus III. AnarrHropora, Smitt. (davapOpos, unjointed.) Zoecia with the oral extremity slightly produced and free, subtubular; orifice terminal, semicircular ; an avicularian pore on the elevated portion of the cell in front, special pore wanting. Zoariwm (in the British species) adnate.—T. H. 1, A. monopox, Busk. Lepralia monodox (Bush). Hab.: Shetland (A. /. N.), from deep water. In the young state this species is very beautiful, being richly ornamented with stellate pores or openings, which become lost in reticulations in the older cells. The cells are ovate, with a tubular neck. The Zoo- phyte forms branching colonies on stones, &c., at a depth of 80—300 fathoms. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 259 Genus IV. Lacenrpeora, Hincks. (Lagena, a flask.) Oolonies consisting of a number of cells immersed in a common calcareous crust. Zowcia decumbent, con- tiguous, lageniform ; oral extremity free, tubular, with a terminal orbicular orifice.—T. H. 1. L. soctauis, Hincks. Hab.: Hastings (Miss Jelly). This zoophyte (described by Mr. Hincks in the Ann. N. H., Sept., 1877, 215) forms small white colonies incrusting the shell of Pecten maximus. The cells are ornamented with granular markings, and are flask-shaped, with long tubular necks. FAMILY XIII. MYRIOZOIDA, Smitt. Zoarium incrusting, or rising into foliaceous expan- sions, or dendroid. Zocwcia calcareous, destitute of a membranous area and raised margins ; orifice with a sinus on the lower lip.—T. H. Genus I. Scuizoporrtia, Hincks. (cxifw, I divide.) Zoccia with a semicircular or suborbicular orifice, the inferior margin with a central sinus. > Lmperial, 181. Crock, 180. Climbing dodder-like coralline, 321. Creeping coralline, 223. fp bell coralline, 98. Er stony coralline, 221. Ciliated coralline, 226. Coat-of-mail coralline, 215. Daisy anemone, 149. Dahlia wartlet, 170. Deeplet, 169. Devonshire cup coral, 184. Dead man’s hand or fingers, 195. Hyed anemone, 155. Hyelet, 159. Fern coralline, 114. Fish-mouth anemone, 153. Furrowed creeplet, 183. Great-tooth coralline, 106. Goat’s-horn coralline, 294. Grape coralline, 321. Gem pimplet, 167. Glaucous pimplet, 167. Gapelet, 173. Globe-horn, 180. SS Herring-bone coralline, 102. Horse-tail coralline, 86. Hornwrack, broad-leaved, 236. = narrow-leaved, 237. Irregular spongy coralline, 240. Knotted thread coralline, 81. 7‘ wedge coral, 186. Long-armed polyp, 135. Lily or Pomegranate flowering coralline, 109. Lobster’s-horn coralline, 123. Latticed corklet, 161. Marigold wartlet, 170. Moray cup coral, 185. Narrow-leaved hornwrack, 237. Nit coralline, 314. Necklet, 172. Orange-disked anemone, 151. Opelet, 165. Podded coralline, 128. Pheasant’s-tail coralline, 130. Painted corklet, 161. » pufilet, 177. Pallid anemone, 154. Parasitic anemone, 158. Plumose anemone, 148. Red-speckled pimplet, 168. Ringed deeplet, 169. Rosy anemone, 151. Small ramified tubular coralline, 60. Small climbing coralline, 85. Sea-mats = hornwrack. 390 NATURAL HISTORY OF Sea-thread coralline, 83. tamarisk, 111. silk, 313. », oak, 112. hair, 113. ny sibey OLS, cypress, 116. spleenwort, 119. , beard, 123. bristles, 124. ragged Ane 308. Shar frefoil coralling; 107. Squirrel’s-tail cor alline, 115. Sickle coralline, 118. Snake coralline, 212. Soft-feathered coralline, 230. Shepherd’s-purse coralline, 233. Stony foliaceous coralline, 273. Scarlet-fringed anemone, 150. Snowy anemone, 151. Sandalled anemone, 153. Snake locked anemone, 156. Scottish pearlet, 173. Scarlet pearlet, 174. Sand pintlet, 175. Sprawlet, 176. Sandy creeplet, 182. Smooth- ribbed wedge coral, 186. Scarlet crisp coral, 189. Scarlet and gold star coral, 188. Shetland cup coral, 185. Tubular coralline, like oaten pipes, files Tubular coralline, wrinkled like the windpipe, 73. Tufted ivory coralline, 294, Translucent anemone, 154, Trefoil muzzlet, 175. Trumplet, 159. Tuft coral, 187. Vestlet, 179. Walled corklet, 161. Warted corklet, 162. Waved muzzlet, 175. Wrinkled creeplet, 183. Winged cup coral, 186. Weymouth cup coral, 188. Yellow Imperiai anemone, 181. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 351 INDEX OF FAMILIES, GENERA, AND SPECIES. Acamarchis plumosa, 230. ACHARADRIA, 56. larynx, 56. AcTINTIA, 163. anguicoma, 156. aurantiaca, 148. aurora, 151. Ballii, 168. bellis, 149. bimaculata, 167. biserialis, 159. candida, 153. carciniopados, 157. cerasum, 164. cereus, 165. chiococca, 164. chrysanthellum, 176. chrysosplenium, 154. clavata, 168. coccinea, 155. corallina, 163. coriacea, 171. erassicornis, 171. dianthus, 148. digitata, 170. effeta, 158. elegans, 150. equina, 163. felina, 171. Jiscella, 171. Forskalli, 164. Sragacea, 164. gemmaceda, 167, 171. Holsatica, 171. maculata, 157. margaretifera, 163. mesembryanthemum, 164. miniata, 150. - nivea, 151. ornata, 150, 152. pallida, 154. parasitica, 158. (Synonyms are in italics.) Geoffreyi,) ACTINIA pedunculata,| AGLAOPHENIA 149, pellucida, 154. pentapetala, 148. picta, 157. plumosa, 148. pulcherrima, 151. rosea, 151. rufa, 163. senilis, 148. sulcata, 165. tabella, 164. Templetonii, 149. troglodytes, 155. Tuedia, 169. undata, 155. venusta, 151. verrucosa, 167. viduata, 156. viridis, 165. ACTINIARIA, 147, AcTININ», 147. ACTINID®, 163. Actinocereus lata, 149. ACTINOLOBA, 147. dianthus, 148. Actinopora 306. ACTINOZOA, 186, 190. ADAMSIA, 156. palliata, 157. Rondeletii, 158. Aigeon Alfordi, 168. Aquora vitrina, 94. ATEA, 212. anguina, 212. recta, 213. sica, 213. truncata, 214. JATEIDH, 212. AGIAOPHENTA, 128. Catharina, 125. faleata, 118. Srutescens, 127. regularis, mMYTLO - phyllum, 1380. pennatula, 132. pinnata, 124, pluma, 128. plumosa, 129. setacea, 125. tubulifera, 129. ATIPTaAsta, 159. amacha, 159. Couchii, 159. ALCYONARIA, 190. ALCYONELLA, 327. anceps, 328. articulata, 324). Benedeni, 328. flabellum, 328. Sluviatilis, 328. fungosa, 328. gelatinosa, 328. secundus, §¢c., 326. stagnorum, 328, 329. tertius, &c., 327. peduncu-}|ALCYONID™®, 195. ALCYONIDIID#, 307. ALCYONIDIUM, 308. albidum, 310. diaphanum, 308. disjunctum, 309. echinatum, 41. gelatinosum, 308. hexagonum, 310. hirsutum, 308. hispidum, 311. lineare, 309. mamillatum, 309. mytili, 309. papillosum, 309. parasiticum, 310. polyoum, 310. ALCYONIUM, 195. digitatum, 195. echinatum, 41. gelatinosum, 308. glomeratum, 196. ALCYonIUM hirsutum,|ARACHNIDIUM, 312, 309. clavatum, 312. lobulatum, 195. fibrosum, 312. parasiticum, 310. hippothooides, 312. sanguineum, 196. Arum Cocksii, 58. Alecto dichotoma, 296. |ASTREIDH, 188, dilatans, 297. ATHECATA, 36. granulata, 296, Atractylis arenosa, 63. incurvata, 298. bitentaculata, 66. major, 296. coccineus, 66. repens, 296. linearis, 66. retiformis, 298. margarica, 67. Alysidota Alderi, 261. miniatus, ob. conferta, 264, palliatus, 65. labrosa, 283. quadritentaculata, 66. AMATHIA, 314. ramosa, 70. lendigera, 314. repens, 64. Amphiblestrum sessilis, 04. branaceum, 245. AURELIANA, 181. Amphisbetiaoperculata,| augusta, 181. 113. heterocera, 181. mem- Amphitrocha rugosa,| regalis, 181. 108. AURELIANID#, 181. ANARTHROPORA, 258. |AULACTINIA, 168. borealis, 257. Alfordi, 168. AVENELLA, 316. Dalyelli, 317. dilatata, 319. fusca, 317. gigantea, 319. Avicella avicularia, 229. multispina, 231. Avicularia flabellata, monodon, 258, ANEMONTA, 165. edulis, 165. suleata, 165. Tuedia, 169. Anguinaria anguina, 212 serpent, 212. spathulata, 212. 229. truncata, 214. BAaLANOPHYLIIA, 188. ANGUINELLA, 319. regia, 188. BEANIA, 231. mirabilis, 232. Berenicea brillante, 252. coccinea, 259, 286. écarlate, 286. Slava, 284. hyalina, 266. immersa, 284. nitida, 252. trispinosa, 282. BICELLARIA, 226. Alderi, 227. ciliata, 226. Hookeri, 224. plumosa, 230. rampante, 223. palmata, 319. Annulipora pilosa, 240. dentata, 240. ANTENNULARIA, 122. antennina, 123. arborescens, 123. indivisa, 128. ramosa, 123. simplex, 123. Anthea cerens, 165. Couchii, 159. Tuedia, 169. ANTHOZOA, 136. ARACHNACTIS, 176. albida, 176. ARACHNIDIIDA, 312. NATURAL HISTORY OF BICELLARIA reptans, 223. seruposa, 221. unispinosa, 22'7. BICELLABRIDA, 225. BIMERTIA, 67. vestita, 68. BIMERID®, 62. Biseriaria thuja, 119. articulata, 119. Borocera, 169. eques, 169. Tuediz, 169. BOUGAINVILLIA, 69. fruticosa, 70. muscus, 70. ramosa, 70. BowERBANKEIA, 315. caudata, 315. citrina, 316. densa, 315. gracillima, 316. imbricata, 315. pustulosa, 3165. repens, 317. Brachionus cernuus,332. BReEttiA, 218. pellucida, 219. tubzeformis, 219. Bua@uLa, 227. avicularia, 227. calathus, 230. ciliata, 226. Sastigiata, 230. flabellata, 229. gracilis, 230. Murrayana, 231. neritana, 219. plumosa, 230. purpurotincta, 230. turbinata, 228. Bunopes, 166. Ballii, 168. clavata, 168. coronata, 163. crassicornis, 171. gemmacea, 167. miniata, 150. thallia, 167. Bunovip#, 166. Busk14, 318. nitens, 318. BUSEIID®, 317. CaBERIA, 224. Boryii, 225. Ellisii, 224. Hookeri, 224, Zelanica, 225. Calliactis effeta, 158. Callopora lineata, 242. CaLYCELLA (Calicella), dumosa, 96. fastigiata, 98. Sruticosa, 97. humilis, 99. lacerata, 95. parvula, 97. syringa, 98. CaLYPTosLastra, 79. CAMPANULARIA, 84. abietina, 100. angulata, 87, bicophora, 80. breviscyphia, 86. caliculata, 86. clausa, 89. decipiens, 88. dichotoma, 83, 90. dumosa, 96. exigua, 88. Sastigiata, 98. Jlabellata, 84, flexuosa, 87. ? fragilis, 88. Sruticosa, 97. gelatinosa, 82, 83. geniculata, 81, 90. ? gigantea, 88. gracillima, 97. grimpante, 85. Hincksii, 85. humilis, 99. integra, 86. Johnstoni, 80. lacerata, 94, levis, 86. muricata, 1038. neglecta, 87. ovifera, 321. parvula, 97. ? raridentata, 88. rugueux, 108. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. 353 CAMPANULARIA Serpens,|CELLARID®, 234. 100. syringa, 98. verticillata, 86. volubilis, 85. volubilis (syx.), 80. CAMPANULARIID®, 79. CAMPANULINA, 92. acuminata, 93. repens, 93. tenuis, 93. turrita, 93. CAMPANULINIDA, 92. Campylonema tremulum, 322. CAMPYLONEMIDA, 321. Canda reptans, 223. Candelabrum arcticum, 58. Capnea, 180. sanguinea, 180. Capsularia serpens, 98. Carbasea papyracea,238 papyrea, 238. CaRYOPHYLIIA, 184. cyathus, 184. sessilis, 184, Smithii, 184. Catenaria chelata, 215. Catenicella divaricata, 269. CELLARIA, 234. anguina, 212. avicularia, 22/7. bursaria, 233. chelata, 215. ciliata, 226. cornuta, 294. denticulata, 295. eburnea, 294. Surciminoides, 234. fistulosa, 234. Johnsoni, 235. longchitis, 119. loriculata, 217. plumosa, 230. reptans, 223. salicornia, 234. scruposa, 221. sinuosa, 235. ternata, 220. thuja, 119. Cellarina gracilis, 220. scabra, 222. CELLEPORA, 290. annulata, 250. armata, 292. attenuata, 292. avicularia, 292. avicularis, 292. bimucronata, 298. cervicornis, 2'78. ciliata, 253. coccinea, 286. Costazii, 293. crenilabris, 253. dichotoma, 292. edax, 275. Hassallii, 293. hyalina, 266. lamellosa, 273. levis, 2'78. Maery, 253. Malusii, 253. nitida, 252, 266. othopora, 261. Pallasiana, 272. personata, 266. palmata, 288. pertusa, 275. perlacea, 275. pleuropora, 253. pumicosa, 291. rameux, 291. ramulosa, 291. Skenei, 288. spinosa, 291. tubigera, 292. verrucosa, 276, 291. vulgaris, 261. Celleporaria Hassallii, 298. CELLEPORBLLA, 258. hyalina, 266. lepraloides, 258. pygmeea, 258. CELLEPORID®, 290. Celleporina Hassallii, 298. CELLULARIA, 219. anguina, 212. avicularia, 228. bursaria, 233. Aa 304 CELLULARIA 215. ciliata, 226. cornuta, 294. eburnia, 294. fastigiata, 230. faleata, 294. Hookeri, 224, 225. loriculata, 217. neritana, 219. Peachii, 219. plumosa, 230. reptans, 223. salicornia, 234. scabra, 222. seruped, 222. seruposa, 221. ternata, 220. CELLULARID®#, 219. Cereus clavata, 168. digitata, 170. gemmacea, 167. thalia, 167. CERIANTHID®, 178. CERIANTHIN”, 178. CERIANTHUS, 178. borealis, 179. Lloydii, 179. membranaceus, 179. Ceriopora stellata, 307. Chartella papyracea, 237. securifrons, 237, CHEILOSTOMATA, 212. CHITONACTIS, 162. coronata, 162. CHORIZOPORA, 256. Brongniartii, 256. CIONISTES, 44. reticulata, 44. CLaDOCORYNE, 78. floccosa, 78. CLADOCORYNID®, 78. CLADONEMA, 53. radiatum, 53. CiAVA, 36. cornea, 37. diffusa, 37. disereta, 36. leptostyla, 37. membranacea, 37. multicornis, 36. chelata, NATURAL HISTORY OF Cuava nodosa, 37. repens, 36. squamata, 37. CLAVATELLA, 57. prolifera, 57. CLAVATELLID®, 57. CLAVID®, 36. Clavula Gossii, 39. CryttA, 79. Johnstoni, 79. poterium, 86. rugosa, 107. syringa, 98. uva, 321. verticillata, 86. Conopeum reticulum,239. Coppinta, 101. arcta, 101. mirabilis, 101. CoPpPINIID#, 101. Corallina setacea, 124. CoRDYLOPHORA, 40. lacustris, 40. Cornularia dumosa, 96. rugosa, 90. Coronopora truncata, 307. Corymbogonium capil- lare, 62. CoRYMORPHA, 76. nana, 78. nutans, 77. CoRYNACTIDA, 179. Corynactis, 180. Allmani, 180. heterocera, 181. viridis, 180. CorYNzE, 46. Briareus, 51. Cerberus, 55. eximia, 49. fruticosa, 48. glandulosa, 46. gravata, 50. implexa, 51. Listerii, 49. mirabilis, 50. multicornis, 36, 37. ? nutans, 49. pelagica, 51. pusilla, 46. ramosa, 46, 47. CoryNE Sarsii, 49. sessilis, 46. Stauridia, 53. squamata, 36, 37. vaginata, 47. Van Benedeni, 48. vermicularis, 48. CoRYNID#, 46. CoRyYNOPSIS, 43. Alderi, 44. Cotulina polyzonias,106. CRIBRILINA, 249, annulata, 250. figularis, 250, Gattyz, 251. innominata, 249. punctata, 249. radiata, 249. CRIBRILINID®, 249. Cribrina bellis, 149. cortiacea, 171. verrucosa, 167. Criserpia Johnstonii, 297. Crisia, 293. aculeata, 294. avicularia, 227. Boryi, 225. chelata, 215, ciliata, 226. cornuta, 294. denticulata, 295. eburnia, 294. Haueri, 294, ivoire, 294. loriculata, 217. luxata, 295. plumosa, 230. reptans, 223. ternata, 220. CrisIIDm, 293. Crisidia cornuta, 294. geniculata, 294. setacea, 294. CRISTATELLA, 326. mirabilis, 326. moisissure, 326. mucedo, 326. vagans, 326. CRISTATELLID ®, 325. CTrENOSTOMATA, 307. Cuscularia cuscuta. 322. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES, 309 EDWARDSIELLA All- mani, 178. Goodsiri, 178. EDWARDSIN®, 177. EKLEUTHEROBLASTEA, 1338. ELEUTHEROPLEA PHY- LACTOCARPA, 121. GYMNOCARPA, 122. Entacmea mesembryan- themum, 164. rufa; 164, ENTALOPHORA, 801. clavata, 301. Epipetrum gelatinosum, 308. Discopora coriacea, 247. cruenta, 265. hispida, 305. pavonella, 287. Skenei, 288. trispinosa, 280. verrucosa, 276. Discoporella coccinea, 284. Jflosculus, 306. hispida, 305. radiata, 306. verrucaria, 306. Discosparsa marginata> 302. patina, 302. werrucaria, 302. Distansescharellina pte- ropora, 286. CUSPIDELLA, 99, costata, 99. grandis, 99. humilis, 99. Cyanea coccinea, 39. Cyathina Smithii, 184. CycLostomatTa, 293. * Cycloum papillosum,308. hispidum, 311. Cruista, 154. coccinea, 155, undata, 155. viduata, 156. CyLInDRxcIvUM, 318. dilatatum, 319. giganteum, 318. pusillum, 319. CYLINDER XCIID®, 318. Cylindroporella, tubu- Epistomia bursaria, 233. Eschara Beaniana, 289. losa, 257. Cymodocea simplex, 82. Defrancia stellata, 307. truncata, 307. DIASTOPORA, 302. hyalina, 303. lato-marginata, 303. obelia, 303. patina, 302. sarniensis, 303. simplex, 303. suborbicularis, 303. Dicorynb, 68. conferta, 68. capillare, 62. stricta, 68. DipHasta, 109, alata, 112. attenuata, 109. fusca, 117. fallax, 110. margareta, 110. nigra, 111. pinaster, 110. pinnata, 111. rosacea, 109. tamarisca, 111. Diporvtna, 255. verrucosa, 255, Discopora appensa, 286, bispinosa, 271. coccinea, 284, 285. Domopora, 307. stellata, 307. truncata, 307. Dynamena abietina, 115. argentea, 115. brunatre, 111. bursaria, 233. cupressina, 116. filicula, 114. naine, 112. nigra, 117. noire, 117. operculata, 113. pinaster, 110. pinnata, 110, 111. pulchella, 1138. pumila, 112. rosacea, 109. tamarisea, 111. Dysactis biserialis, 159. Dysidia papillosa, 182. Echinochorium clavige- rum, 41. EcTOPLEURA, 76. Dumortierii, 76, Epwarpstia, 177. Beautempsii, 177. callimorpha, 177. vestita, 179. EDWARDSID#, 177. EDWARDSIELLA, 177. carnea, 178. Aa2 biaperta, 263. bidentata, 2'73. cervicornis, 278. ciliata, 253. cribraria, 287, 289. Sascialis, 273. Jistulosa, 234. foliacea, 236, 273. Landsborovii, 280. levis, 278. lorea, 289. lunaris, 255. Pallasiana, 272. palmata, 288. pavonella, 287. quincuncialis, 279. radiata, 249, retiformis, 273. rosacea, 279, securifrons, 237. Skene, 288. stellata, 278. teres, 278. verrucosa, 255. vulgaris, 253, 261. Escharella auriculata, 263. immersa, 284. Jacobini, 282. Land sborovii, 280. legentili, 280. linearis, 262, 265. pertusa, 278. 356 Escharella 262. variolosa, 285. EscHARID®, 272. Escharina Ballii, 286. coccinea, 286. cornuta, 254. perlacea, 275. personata, 266. pertusa, 275. rvimulata, 280. variabilis, 260. vulgaris, 253, 261. Filicrisia sanguinea,| Falearia anguina, 212. cornuta, 294. FARELLA, 317. dilatata, 319. Jusca, 319. gigantea, 319. pedicellata, 321. producta, 317. repens, 317. FILELLUM, 100. serpens, 100. geniculata, 294, Escharipora annulata,| Fistulana ramosa, 60. 249. figularis, 249. punctata, 249. ESCHAROIDES, 279. nitida, 252. quincuncialis, 279. rosacea, 279. Eucope alternata, 81. campanulata, 80. diaphana, 81. EvucratTeEa, 215. appendiculata, 294. chelata, 215. cornuta, 294. Eucratip#, 215. EUDENDRIIDA, 59. EUDENDRIUM, 59. annulatum, 61. arbusculum, 61. bacciferum, 67. bryoides, 73. capillare, 62. confertum, 68. humile, 62. insigne, 62. pudicum, 101. pusillum, 64. rameum, 59. ramosum, 60. ramosum (syn.), 70. sessile, 64: vaginatum, 62. EvuPsAMMIDS, 188. Farcimia fistulosa, 234. salicornia, 234, 235. sinuosa, 235. spathulata, 235. Fistularia ramosa, 60. Flabellaria setacea, 224. spiralis, 231. FLABELLUM, 187. arcticum, 187. Mac Andrewi, 187. FLUSTRA, 235. angustiloba, 229. avicularis, 229. Barleei, 237. Brongniartii, 256. carbasea, 238. carnosa, 311, Cecilii, 265. chartacea, 237. coriacea, 241, 247. dentata, 240, distans, 239. Dumerilii, 244. Dutertrei, 267. Ellisii, 224. Jistulosa, 234, foliacea, 236. Genisii, 253. Hibernica, 272. hispida, 311. impressa, 254, Lacroixzii, 239. lineata, 240, 242. membranacea,241, 245, Murrayana, 231. papyracea, 236. papyrea, 238. Peachii, 239. pilosa, 240. Rossellii, 245. seruposa, 222, securifrons, 237. NATURAL HISTORY OF FLustTRa setacea, 224. spinifera, 242. spongiosa, 311, telacea, 241. trifolium, 245. truncata, 237. tuberculata, 245. unicornis, 243. FLUSTRELLA, 311. hispida, 311. FLUSTRILLIDS, 311. FLUSTRID”®, 235. FREDERICELLA, 331. dilatata, 332. Sultana, 331. Funicurina, 200. antennina, 200. Forbesii, 200. quadrangularis, 200. FUNICULINID#, 200. GARVEIA, 67. nutans, 67. Gemmaria implera, 51. GEMEELABIA, 216. loricata, 217. loriculata, 217. Willisii, 217. Gemelliporaglabra, 266. Gemicellaria bursaria, 233. loriculata, 217. GONOTHYR#A, 90. gracilis, 91. ? hyalina, 91. Lovéni, 90. Goreonta, 196. anceps, 197. flabellum-veneris, 197. pinnata, 196. placomus, 197. verrucosa, 196. viminalis, 196. GORGONIDA, 196. Grammaria abietina, 100. ramosa, 100. rotusta, 100. GREGORIA, 159. fenestrata, 159. GYMNOBLASTEA, 36. GYMNOCHROA, 133. GYMNOCORYNE, 52. coronata, 52. GYMNOLEMATA, 212. Halatractus nana, 78. Hatcampa, 175. chrysanthellum, 175. HALcaMPIp®, 175. Hasterciipa#, 102. HALeEcium, 102. Beanii, 103. geniculatum, 105. halecinum, 102. labrosum, 104. muricatum, 103. plumosum, 104. sessile, 105. tenellum, 104. verticillatum, 86. HaricornaRrta, 132. pennatula, 132. Halodactylus diaphanus, 308. HELracris, 149. bellis, 149. miniata, 150. ornata, 152. venusta, 151. Hemeschara sanguinea, 262. struma, 278. Herentia biforis, 254. Hyndmanni, 267. linearis, 262. Hermia glandulosa, 47. HETEROCORDYLE, 69. Conybeari, 69. Heteroporella hispida, 305 HEXACTINIA, 147. HipporHoa, 269. biaperta, 263. cassiterides, 271. catenularia, 239. distans, 270. divaricata, 269. divergens, 263. Elliota, 239. expansa, 270. Slagellum, 2'70. lanceolata, 269. longicauda, 269. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. HirrorHoa Patagonica,|ILYANTHID®, 173. 269. porosa, 267. sica, 213. HIPPURARIA 321. Egertoni, 321. Hormatuia, 172. Margarete, 172. HorNERA, 304. borealis, 304. Frondiculata, 304. lichenoides, 304. violacea, 304. Hoplangia durotrix,188. HuUXLeEYa, 218. fragilis, 218. Hypra, 133. attenuata, 135. ellis, 149. brunnea, 135. coronata, 332. fusca, 135. grisea, 135. multicornis, 36. pallens, 135. oligactis, 135. squamata, 37. verrucosa, 135. viridis, 134. viridissima, 184. vulgaris, 135. HypDRACcTINIA, 41. areolata, 43. carnea, 42. echinata, 41. lactea, 41. nana, 78. polyclina, 41. rosea, 41. HYDRACTINIDA, 41. HYDRALLMANIA, 118. falcata, 118. HYDRANTHIA, 66, margarica, 67. HyDRID&, 133. HYDROLARIDA, 44, IpmonEa, 3800. Atlantica, 300. radians, 300. serpens, 301. transversa, 301. InyantTuvs (Lluanthos), 173. Scotticus, 173. Mitchellii, 174. Isacmea papillosa, 171. viduata, 156. Kapnea sanguinea, 180. LAFOEA, 96. cornuta, 96. dumosa, 96. fruticosa, 97. parvula, 97. pocillum, 97. pygmea, 97. LAFOEIDH#, 97. Lagenella repens, 317. LAGENIPORA, 259. socialis, 259. Laguncula elongata,317. repens, 317. Laomedia acuminata, 93. angulata, 87. dichotoma, 83, 90. exigua, 88. flexuosa, 87. gelatinosa, 82, 87. geniculata, 81. gracilis, 91. lacerata, 95. longissima, 83. Lovéni, 90. muricata, 108. neglecta, 87. obliqua, 126. pulchella, 50. spinosa, 313. tenuis, 95. touffue, 96. verticillata, 86. LaR, 45. Sabellarum, 45. LEPRALTIA, 272. abyssicola, 285. adpressa, 274. affinis, 281. alba, 201. annulata, 250. ansata, 259. 358 LEPRALIA aperta, 277. appensa, 286. arrecta, 284. arrogata, 281. assimilis, 256. auriculata, 263. aurita, 267. Ballii, 286. Barleei, 261. bella, 282. Belli, 2'77. biaperta, 263. bicornis, 288. biforis, 254. bispinosa, 271. Brongniartii, 256. calomorpha, 249. canthariformis, 273, capitata, 256. Cecilii, 265. cheilostoma, 281. ciliata, 2538, 261. coccinea, 259, 286. collaris, 283. complanata, 247. concinna, 277, cruenta, 265. crystallina, 280. discoidea, 264. diversipora, 255. divisa, 269. edax, 275. eximia, 283. Fenestralis, 272. Sigularis, 250. Jissa, 268. foliacea, 273. Gattye, 251. granifera, 254. Hassallii, 293. hastata, 262. hippopus, 275. hyalina, 266. Hyndmanni, 267. immersa, 284. énnominata, 249. insignis, 253. Jacotini, 256. Jeffreysti, 282. labrosa, 283. Landsborovii, 280. laqueata, 285. NATURAL HISTORY OF LEPRALIA lata, 274. linearis, 262. lineata, 253. Malusii, 254. mamillata, 286. marmorea, 281. melolontha, 252. microstoma, 286. minuta, 277. monodon, 258. nitida, 252. ochracea, 263. othopora, 261. otophora, 267. ovalis, 285. Pallasiana, 272. Peachii, 284. pediostoma, 272. perigrina, 286, personata, 2538. pertusa, 274. plagiopora, 255. polita, 276. pteropora, 286. punctata, 249. pyriformis, 254. reticulata, 280. ringens, 246, seripta, 249. simplex, 261. sinuosa. 265. spinifera, 259, 260. Steindachneri, 251. tenella, 262. tenera, 285. tenuis, 256 tetragona, 260. thyreophora, 254. tridentata, 286. trispinosa, 282. tubulosa, 257. umbonata, 264. unicornis, 259. utriculus, 253. variolosa, 285. ventricosa, 284. venusta, 266. verrucosa, 276. vinea, 285. violacea, 255. vulgaris, 261. Woodiana, 267. LEPTOSCYPHUS, 95. tenuis, 95. LEPTOSCYPHID®, 95, LICHENOPORA, 305. hispida, 305. radiata, 306. regularis, 306. verrucaria, 306. LICHENOPORID, 305. Limnocodium Sowerbii, 335. Lithodendron prolifera, 187 Lobularia digitata, 195. LOPHOHELTA, 187. prolifera, 187. LopHorts, 326. Bakeri, 327. campanulatus, 329. crystallinus, 327. LornHopga, 325. Loricaria Europea, 217. Loricula loricata, 217. LOVENELLA, 89. clausa, 89. Loxosoma, 333. claviforme, 334. phascolosomatum, 334. singulare, 334. Loxosomip#, 333. Lygus mirabilis, 199. Madrepora cyathus, 184. prolifera, 187. verrucaria, 291, 302, 306. MADREPORARIA, 184. MaLacoDERMATA, 147, Manicella fusca, 68. Margelis ramosa, 70. MastiGopPHora, 267. Dutertrei, 267. Hyndmanni, 267. Medusa Ocilia, 70. palliata, 157. Mrcarora, 246. ringens, 246. Melobesia radiata, 306. MEMBRANIPORA, 238. andigavensis, 248. aurita, 24.4, catenularia, 239. MEMBRANIPORA acea, 247. cornigera, 245. craticula, 242. curvirostris, 243. discreta, 243. Dumerilii, 243. Flemingii, 245. flustroides, 24.2. hexagona, 241. imbellis, 244. Lacroixii, 238. lineata, 242. membranacea, 241. minax, 246. monostachys, 239. nitida, 252. nodulosa, 246. pilosa, 240. Pouilletii, 244.. reticulum, 239. Rossellii, 245. sacculata, 245, solidula, 244. solidula, 245. spinifera, 242. Smittii, 247. spongiosa, 311. stellata, 240. trifolium, 245. unicornis, 243. oulnerata, 248. MEMBRANIPORELLA, 251 melolontha, 252. nitida, 251. MEMBRANIPORID®, 238. MENIPEA, 220. Sruticosa, 231. Jeffreysii, 220. ternata, 220. Merona cornucopia, 38. Micropora, 247, complanata, 24/7. coriacea, 247. MicroporeEtta, 253. ciliata, 253. impressa, 254, Malusii, 253. violacea, 255. MICROPORELLID®, 252. Microporip™, 247. Millepora cellulosa, 289. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. cori-| Millepora cervicornis, 278. compressa, 278. Sascialis, 273. foliacea, 273. lichenoides, 304. liliacea, 301. pumicosa, 291. retepora, 289. Skenei, 288. tenialis, 273. truncata, 307. tubulosa, 301. verrucaria, 302. MIMOSELLA, 322. gracilis, 323, MIMOSELLID#, 822. Mollia Brongniarti, 256 hyalina, 266. tuberculata, 256. Monopyxis geniculata,81 longissima, 83. MUCRONELLA, 283. abyssicola, 285. coccinea, 286. laqueata, 285. microstoma, 286. pavonella, 287. Peachii, 284. variolosa, 285. ventricosa, 284. MYRIoTHELA, 58. arctica, 58. Cocksii, 58. Phrygia, 58. MYRIOTHELID®, 58. MYRIOZOIDA, 259. Naisa campanulata,329. repens, 329. reptans, 327. Sultana, 331. Nellia Johnsoni, 235. Nemertesia antennina, 123. ramosa, 123. Nigellastrum antenni- num, 123. articulatum, 119. cuscutum, 322. Suscum, 117. nigrum, 111. 309 Nigellastrum thuja, 119. NorTamia, 232. bursaria, 233. loriculata, 217. NOTAMIID®, 232. Osetra, 81. dichotoma, 83. flabellata, 84. gelatinosa, 82. geniculata, 81. longissima, 83. plicata, 84. tubulifera, 301. OcTOPHELLIA, 162. gausapata, 162. Oculina prolifera, 187. OcULINID®, 187. Onchopora borealis, 257. OPERCULARELLA, 94, lacerata, 94. OpuHiopes, 105. mirabilis, 105. Ornithopora avicularis, 228, 229. PALMICELLARIA, 287. cribraria, 289. elegans, 287, lorea, 289. Skenei, 288. PALUDICELLA, 324. articulata, 324. Ehrenbergii, 324, procumbens, 324. PALUDICELLEA, 324. PALUDICELLIDA, 324. PARACYATHUS, 185. pteropus, 186. taxilianus, 185. Thulensis, 185. Patinella patina, 302. verrucaria, 302. Pavonaria antennina, 200. quadrangularis, 200. Peachia chrysanthellum, 176. hastata, 174. triphylla, 175. undata, 175. PEDICELLINA, 3382. Belgica, 332. 360 NATURAL HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA cernua,332|Phosphorella phospho-\|PopOosTOMATA, 334. Echinata, 332. gracilis, 333. nutans, 333. PEDICELLINEA, 332. PEDICELLINIDA, 332. Penna rosea, 197. rubra, 198. Pennaria falcata, 118. Sruticans, 127. myriophyllum, 1380. pluma, 129. setacea, 125. PENNARIDS, 52. PENNATULA, 197. alba, 197. antennina, 200. britannica, 197. granulosa, 198. italica, 198. mirabilis, 199. phosphorea, 197. pulchella, 198. quadrangularis, 200. rubra, 198. setacea, 198. tetragona, 200. PENNATULIDA, 197. PERIGONIMUS, 64. bitentaculatus, 66. coccineus, 66. linearis, 65. miniatus, 66. minutus, 64. museus, 70. nutans, 66. palliatus, 65. pusillus, 64, quadritentaculatus, » 66. repens, 64, serpens, 65. sessilis, 64. vestitus, 65. rea, 197. pulchella, 198. PHYLACTELLA, 282. collaris, 283. eximia, 283. labrosa, 283. PHYLLANGIA, 188. Americana, 188. durotrix, 188. PLUMATELLA, 329. Allmani, 331. campanulata, 329. erystallina, 32/7. cristata, 327. coralloides, 330. Dumortierii, 331. elegans, 331. emarginata, 330. fruticosa, 330. gelatinosa, 331. Jugalis, 331. lucifuga, 329. punctata, 329. repens, 329. Sultana, 332. PLUMATELLIDA, 329. PLUMULARIA, 124, Catharina, 125. Cornucopiz, 128. cristata, 129. echinulata, 126. en faux, 118. falcata, 118. frutescens, 127. halecioides, 127. myriophyllum, 130. obliqua, 126. pennatula, 132. pinnata, 124. pluma, 129. setacea, 124. siliquosa, 127. similis, 126. _ Phalangella phalangea,| PLUMULARIDA, 120. 299. PHELLIA, 161. Brodrici, 161. gausapata, 162. murocincta, 161. picta, 161. PHELLID#®, 160. PopocoRyNE, 42. albida, 42. Alderi, 44, areolata, 43. carnea, 42. proboscidea, 43. PODOCORYNIDA, 42. Polype a- Panache, 327. Polyp verd, 134. PonyTHoA, 182. arenacea, 182. sulcata, 183. Potyzoa, 201. PORELLA, 277. cervicornis, 278. compressa, 278. concinna, 277. levis, 278. minuta, 277. struma, 278. Porellina ciliata, 253. PoRINA, 257. borealis, 257. ciliata, 253. Malusii, 254. plagiopora, 255. tubulosa, 257. violacea, 255. POBINID®, 257. Porus cervinus, 236, 273, Pustuliporaclavata,302. deflexa, 298, 302. gracilis, 257. orcadensis, 304, proboscidea, 288. Pyrifora ramosa, 239. Quadricellaria gracilis, 257. Reptelectrina dentata, 240. lineata, 242. pilosa, 240. Reptescharella pygmea, 249. rimulata, 280. Reptoflustratelacea,241. Reptoporina biaperta, 263. hexagona, 254. Malusii, 254. subvulgaris, 253. tetragona, 260. RETEPORA, 289. Beaniana, 289. Couchii, 290. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. RETEPORA cellulosa,289.|SCHIZOPORELLA, 259. dentelle de mer, 289. reticulata, 289. Reticularia immersa, 100. serpens, 100. RHABDOPLEURA, 335. compacta, 335. Normani, 335. RHABDOPLEURID®, 334, Rhizoclina areolata, 438. Rhodactinia Davesii, ily(ile Ruyncopora, 271. bispinosa, 271. SaGaRmTta, 153. anguicoma, 156. aurora, 151. bellis, 149. chrysosplenium, 154. coccinea, 155. dianthus, 148. ichthystoma, 153. miniata, 150. nivea, 151. ornata, 152. pallida, 154. parasitica, 158. pellucida, 154. pura, 154. rosea, 151. sphyrodeta, 153. troglodytes, 155. venusta, 151. viduata, 156. SAGARTID®, 147. Savacra, 100. abietina, 100. Alderi, 261. armata, 263. auriculata, 263. biaperta, 263. Cecilii, 265. cristata, 262. cruenta, 265. discoidea, 264. hyalina, 266. Johnstoni, 261. linearis, 262. sanguinea, 262. simplex, 261. sinuosa, 264. spinifera, 260. umbonata, 264. unicornis, 259. venusta, 266. vulgaris, 261. Scirpearia mirabilis,199 SCLERODERMATA, 184. Scolanthus callimorphus, WIZ spheroides, 155. ScruPARIA, 217. chelata, 215. clavata, 218. loricata, 217. reptans, 223. sceruposa, 221. SCRUPOCELLARIA, 221. Delilit, 222. elliptica, 222. inermis, 222. reptans, 223. scabra, 222. scrupea, 222. scruposa, 221. Salicornaria dichotoma,|SELAGINOPSIS, 117. 234, fusca, 117. fareiminoides, 234,235. | Selbia Zelanica, 225. Jistulosa, 234. Johnsoni, 235. salicornia, 234, sinuosa, 235. Salpingia Hassallii,214. Sarcochitum 310. Sarsia mirabilis, 50. ScuHizocLapDi0M, 91. ramosum, 92. Semiflustra 238. Serialaria imbricata, 315. lendigera, 314. carbacea, polyoum,|SERTULARIA, 106. abietina, 115. abietinula, 115. acinaria, 321. alata, 112. SERTULARIA 361 anguind, 212. antennina, 123. arcta, 101. argentea, 115. argentea, 46. argentella, 117, articulata, 119. attenuata, 110. avicularia, 227. bursaria, 233. chelata, 215. ciliata, 226. cornuta, 294. cupressina, 116. cuscuta, 321. dichotoma, 83, 84. dumosa, 96. eburnia, 294. Hllisii, 106. ericoides, 106, 107. Jaleata, 118. fallax, 110, fastigiata, 115. Jilicula, 114. flexuosa, 106. Srutescens, 127. Susea, 117. Juscescens, 111. Gayi, 107. gelatinosa, 82. geniculata, 81. gorgonia, 127. gracilis, 13. halecina, 102, 222. hibernica, 106. imbricata, 315. lendigera, 313. lichenastrum, 119. lonehitis, 119. longissima, 83. loricata, 217. margareta, 110. mollis, 212. muricata, 103. myriophyllum, 130. nigellastrum, 109. nigra, 111, 117. operculata, 113. putagonica, 107. pennatula, 132. piceina, 112. 362 NATURAL HISTORY OF SERTULARIA pinnata,|SmitTTIa cheilostoma,281|TEAtta digitata, 170. 106, 110, 111, 124. pinaster, 110. pluma, 129. polyzonias, 106. pumila, 112. pustulosa, 316. racemosa, 60. repens, 98, 223. reptans, 223, rosacea, 109, 110. rugosa, 107. sapinette, 115. serupeda, 222. seruposa, 222, secundaria, 125. sericea, 313. setacea, 125, 126. seticornis, 123. spinosa, 3138, syringa, 98. tamarisca, 111. tenella, 108. ternata, 220. thuja, 119. tricuspidata, 107. uniflora, 85. usneoides, 113. uva, 821. verticillata, 86. volubilis, 80, 83, 85, 96, 98. Zonée, 89, 106. SERTULARID#, 106. SERTULARELLA, 106. fusiformis, 108. Gayi, 107. poly zonias, 106. rugosa, 107. tenella, 108. tricuspidata, 107. SETOSELLA, 248. vulnerata, 248. Sidisia Barleei, 182. SIPHONACTINIA, 174. hastata, 174. triphylla, 175. undata, 175. SIPHONACTINIDH, 174. Smitria, 279. affinis, 281. bella, 282, Landsborovii, 280. marmorea, 281. reticulata, 280. trispinosa, 282, Spadix purpurea, 58. Greenii, 171. tuberculata, 171. Tessaradoma _ boreali, 257. gracile, 257. SPHENOTROCHUS, 186. |THAUMANTIAS, 89. Andrewianus, 186. inconspicua, 8&9. Macandrewianus, 186.|THECAPHORA, 79. Wrightii, 186. STATOPLEA CARPA, 132. PHYLACTOCARPA, 128. STAURIDIUM, 55. productum, 55. STEGANIPORELLA, 247. Smittii, 248. Stellipora stellata, 307. GYMNO- Thoa Beanii, 103. halecina, 102. muricata, 103. Savigni, 59. THuUIaARIA, 119. articulata, 119. thuja, 119. TRICHYDRA, 101. pudica, 101. STICHODACTYLINZ#, 179.| TRICHYDRIDA, 101. STOMATOPORA, 296. compacta, 298. diastoporides, 298. dilatans, 297. deflexa, 298. expansa, 297. fasciculata, 299. fungia, 298. gallica, 213. granulata, 296. incrassata, 298. incurvata, 297. Johnstoni, 297. major, 296. STomPputa, 172. Churchiz, 173. SYNCORYNE, 49. decipiens, 50. eximia, 49, ferox, 51. frutescens, 51. gravata, 50. lacustris, 40. Listerii, 46. Lovéni, 49. pulchella, 50. pusilla, 46. ramosa, 49. Sarsii, 49. Synhydra parasites, 41. Trarta, 170. crassicornis, 170. TRITICELLA, 320. flava, 320. Koronii, 320. pedicellata, 321. TRITICELLIDA, 320. TUBICLAVA, 38. cornucopiz, 38. fruticosa, 38. lucerna, 38. Tubipora catenulata,239. catenularia, 239. flabellaris, 299. repens, 329. serpens, 300, 301. TUBULARIA, 71. affinis, 36. attenuata, 75. bellis, 75. Britannica, 75. calamaris, 72. campanulata, 327. chalumeau, 72. coronata, 73. coryna, 47. erystallina, 327. Dumortierii, 74, 76. Jistulosa, 234. Sungosa, 328. gelatinosa, 331. gigantea, 72. gracilis, 73. humilis, 75. implexa, 51. TUBULARIA indivisa, 71. larynx, 73. lucifuga, 329. muscoides, '73. ramea, 59. ramosa, 59; 60, 70. reptans, 327. repens, 329. simplex, 74. Sultana, 331, stellifera, 50. trichoides, 60. tubifera, 96. TUBULARID®, 71. TUBULIPORA, 299. bellis, 302. deflexa, 298. fimbria, 300. flabeliaris, 299. Soraminulata, 301. Sungia, 298. hispida, 305. incrassata, 298. incurvata, 298. lobulata, 299. obelia, 303. orbiculus, 305. patina, 302, 306. penicillata, 298. phalangia, 299. pourpre, 301. serpens, 301. trahens, 296. transversa, 301. BRITISH ZOOPHYTES. ToBuLipora fruncata,|VESICULARIA 307. verrucaria, 299. TUBULIPORID®, 296. 565 Susea, 319. pustulosa, 316. spinosa, 313. Turbinolia borealis, 184,.| VESICULARIID&, 313. milletiana, 186. TURBINOLID®, 184. TuRRIS, 39. neglecta, 39. Ulocyathus areticus 187. Ulva diapana, 308. UmBonvta, 276. verrucosa, 276. Unicavea radiata, 306. Onicellaria appendicu- lata, 294. cornuta, 294. VALKERTA, 321. caudata, 318. citrina, 316. cuscuta, 321, 328. glomerata, 315. gracillima, 316. imbricata, 315. lendigera, 314. pustulosa, 316. spinosa, 313. tremula, 322. uva, 321. VALKERIID#, 321. VESICULARIA, 313. cuscuta, 322. VICTORELLA, 324. pavida, 324. VICTORELLID&, 324. VIRGULARIA, 199. laxipenna, 199. mirabilis, 199. VIRGULARIDA, 199. VORTICLAVA, 55. humilis, 56. proteus, 56. WRIGHTIA, 63. acuminata, 93. arenosa, 63. lacerata, 95. syringa, 98. ZANCLEA, 51. implexa, 51. ZOANTHARIA, 136. ZOANTHIDA, 182. ZOANTHINA, 182. ZOANTHUS, 183. Alderi, 183. Couchii, 182. suleatus, 183. ZYGODACTYLA, 93. vitrina, 94. ~~ #) ~ eae * wu . ya Ne . ‘ Age = . . LONDON: PRINTED BY GILBERT AND RIVINGTON, LIMITED, ST. JOHN’S SQUARE. m OC we Prate II. . Clava multicornis, enlarged (after Hincks), p. 36. . Clava squamata, nat. size, p. 37. . Turris neglecta, enlarged, p. 39. . Cordylophora lacustris, hydranth enlarged. 4a, Nat. size, p. 40. . Podocoryne carnea, enlarged, p. 42. PLATE Il. AP del. L Reeve & CoLondon SF) CON GO Ot Prats IIT. . Lar Sabellarum, enlarged (after Gosse), p. 45. . Coryne pusilla, nat. size, p. 46. . Stauridium productum, enlarged (after Allman), p. 50. . Myriothela Cocksii, nat. size (after Hincks), p. 58. . Eudendrium ramosum, nat. size, p. 60. . Garveia nutans, nat. size (after Allman), p. 67. . Tubularia larynx, nat. size, p. 73. . Tubularia Britannica, nat. size, p. 75. PLATE AM. oh oy ai a a \\ > if Wiva\ Fi ¥f ( Di 2 oss SER ts Ce. a a of Saal AQ ~A\, \ os ad Up AP. del L Reeve & Co.London. aor owonbde = Prats IV. . Corymorpha nutans, nat. size (after Allman), p. 77. . Clytia Johnstoni, enlarged, p. 79. . Obelia geniculata. 3a, Calycles enlarged, p. 81. . Obelia gelatinosa, nat. size, p. 82. . Campanularia flexuosa, nat. size, p. 87. . Campanularia angulata, nat. size. 6a, enlarged, peor. . Lafoéa dumosa, enlarged, p. 96. PLATE IV. AP del. L.Reeve & CoLondon. Prats V. 1. Calycella syringa, enlarged (after Hincks), p. 98. 2. Halecium halecinum, nat. size. 2a, Calycles en- larged, p. 102. 3. Sertularella polyzonias, nat. size. 3a, Calycles en- larged, p. 106. A, Sertularella Gayi, nat. size. 4a, Calycles enlarged, p. 207. PLATE V. L Reeve & Co. London. wa > 7 bo (oy) Pirate VI. . Sertularella rugosa on F. foliacea, nat. size. 1a, Calycles and gonophores enlarged, p. 107. . Diphasia tamarisca, nat. size. 2a, Calycles and female capsule (after Hincks), p. 111. . Diphasia pinnata, nat. size, p. 111. PLATE Vi. AP del. L.Reeve & Co. London. _ | = © > ly Ms _ aa. _—— — ~ - -. - ——— oe an Tae (on re ‘ 7 S a : g ra i> | r 6 - ; Pic _ r 7 7 ; r - t 7 = , a - j ‘ “ h 2 Pirate VII. . Sertularia pumila, nat. size. 14, Calycles and gono- phore enlarged, p. 112. . Sertularia argentea, nat. size. 2a, Calycles enlarged, p. 116. 3. Sertularia operculata, nat. size. 3a, Calycles en- larged, p. 118. PLATE Vil. AP del. L Reeve & Co.London Prats VIII. 1. Sertularia argentella, nat. size. 1a, enlarged, p. 107. 2. Sertularia abietina, nat.size. 2a, Calycles enlarged, p. 115. 3. Hydrallmania falcata, nat. size. 3a, Calycles en- larged, p. 118. PLATE VIII. TL Reeve & Co. London. Bm Cc Do Prats IX, . Thuiaria thuja, nat. size, p. 119. . Antennularia antennina, nat. size, p. 123. . Plumularia halecioides, nat. size, p. 127. . Plumularia setacea, nat. size. 4a, Calycles en- larged, p. 124. . Aglaophenia pluma, nat. size, p. 128. . Halicornaria pennatula, nat. size (after Hincks), p. 132. . Hydra viridis, enlarged, p. 135. PLATE 1x, aS ALP. del. mdon 3 Sx Oo (a L.Reeve & Piatt X. 1. Aglaophenia plumosa, nat. size. 1a, Calycles en- larged, p. 129. 2. Corbula of A. pluma, see p. 128. PLATE-X: i. Reeve 09 Landon. Prate XI. Diagrams illustrative of structure of Sea Anemones. 1. Section through Actinia (after Green). 2, Septum of S. parasitica (A. Rondeletii) (after Hert- wig). 3. Diagram showing arrangement of septa in base of A. equina (mesembryanthemum), from Journal of Queckett Club, vol. v., plate x. 4. Section through tentacle of Anemonia sulcata (A. cereus) (after Hertwig). 5. 'Thread-cells or nematocysts (after Hertwig). For descriptions of these figures, see chapter on Anemone Structure, pp. 136—145. PLATE Xj. L. Reeve & Co.London. Puate XII. 1. Actinoloba dianthus, p. 148. 2. Heliactis bellis, p. 149. 3. Heliactis venusta, p. 151. 4. Tentacle of Cylista undata, p. 109. PLATEXII. AP del. L-Reeve & Co.London. Pirate XIII. 1. Adamsia Rondeletii, p. 158. 2. Cylista viduata, p. 156. 3. Aiptasia Couchi, p. 159. PLATE XMIt. L. Reeve & Co. London Oo oF CO DH Pruate XIV. . Actinia equina (mesembryanthemum), p. 1638. . Tealia crassicornis, p. 170. . Siphonactinia (Peachia) hastata, p. 174. Tlyanthus scotticus (after Forbes), p. 173. . Polythoa arenacea (Z. Couchii), after Couch, p. 182. . Caryophyllia Smithi (after Gosse), p. 184. Oe Qe ae TS Np ee ae PLATE XIV, L.Reeve & Co. London. no — a Puate XV. . Polyp of Alcyonium digitatum, enlarged, p. 195. . Section through polyp of A. digitatum (after Hert- wig), p. 191. . Pennatula phosphorea (after Milnes-Marshall), p. 197. . . Virgularia mirabilis (after Milnes-Marshall), p. 199. . Gorgonia verrucosa (after Couch), p. 196. v4 DO h D ) A aw NY Vy Sun WW Za ‘ es ae z we SNK = D7, 7 Sh Si Be Sere ALP del. PLATE XV, Puate XVI. Diagrams descriptive of structure of Polyzoa. 1, Diagram of Polyzoa (after Busk). 2. Diagram of Bowerbankia (after Hincks). 3. Polyzoon with polypide retracted (after Hincks). 4, 5, Communication plates (after Hincks). 6. Alimentary canal of Cellepora (after Hincks). 7. “ Bird’s Head ”’ processes, p. 208. 8. Structure of Notamia bursaria (after Busk). For descriptions of these figures, see chapter on Structure of Polyzoa, pp. 201—210. i PLATE XVI, — —— ew Ate Ss To ee Se eee Ss oe T hC6n ee Lan ee Sa Be © bdo Pirate XVII. . Aitea anguina, nat. size. 1a, Enlarged, p. 212. . Eucratea chelata, enlarged, p. 215. . Gemellaria loricata, nat. size. 3a, Enlarged, p. 217. . Menipea ternata, nat. size. 44, Enlarged, p. 220. . Scrupocellaria reptans, nat. size. 5a, Enlarged, p. 223. . Bicellaria ciliata, nat. size. 6a, Enlarged (after Hincks), p. 226. PLATEXVU. Ie a SS Oi Ss ep) | < e op) Ou Gp oO a e) re) . BIEN N re) aS ~ (ate eS, ) + W [en er or ae | Cx ao e) o~ Ba reall ie aa | HATA 001.