CO
wo
Hd™ H
wl Ww OV ZZ
Ost O
ar
U , : D ¢ ) 4 r \ vi) , Abe . " vi 4 id
* . —_ - 7 : ; ili! { Sa aes Oe ead . al
7 - ‘ rs . : . ; , . whe? Tee ae é ted gar aeuel ean ‘ err
re te Ee re ee ; - " : a3 2 E ‘
INANE, IN I Were BI pram) HO
LORI OR ABER G4 OOM ag ROTM a
Baan, oy PR SAS AA = aespiannantanen
‘Ma, AnAAaaa aA An aannr
Poi sie ee
NAAM. : pannora’n “near
aha “
Anan ae Aca A bs AAR
A BP fn mad / Yaa
AA AR AA AP Rs BAC AA Rant!
A Ae Annan sent an
iw tne pane NORA
wi same nnd ANne
anomie mats nanatnn manana ae
ar Ru aaaan ct Anan ain ana anne |
+ a LNT a \ gt & {Xn ey
wit Meananrae
mae Aan Ae ie Baers
LN FY
Se Wee pg
An as Ann
oa —- Reda
255°
D> 4 Mg ee lng
— y) ~~ » ‘
5 > >
; ) . PDS A a
» BD)
PERN TEGAN
os a ANS ee
ona nena OE
AN Sea it Nan. ra bab reas tes ? We Ber cn PN Ng NY at
On nie ae anann’ pnt AAA Pe aeans
Annan PeaN aon anne
Wr, AAA ne A Aetnn ay Ne
PAAn Annan’ ARABS
Wale
Boe
Wat aay :
(247A LANA Ranal
We a nannannat Ana
pane aa Ny aa
Oe “he iaaia Af Aare
bans eave ai Ne ache SS
AAAAAAAA ann ann eaetnn ean Nae i n
hp Anna annee > Sy af
perc nen ananth saan aaaaaee 7 * pew!
ARAAA aceasta rt na
>
>
ee
ia
2}
ze
Ds
My
AAA wacpielgehia ne
fr.
| poy RARE Ae Ae | eo
ent eninge ar
ran AA sa nck
PARAL fle. co if
PAL ON! ae Oe AR
f
ay
3)
‘ f - - 1
| Awe A
i, nana
anna Aan uEFA ARR enh
nA sa
is
4 ~ if
nn Ann, nARBAC
annonn AANA
onsen NRA NAAR
Me aap AAA aA A A nanan’
ROU ane a mennenel e eta ae ae n
a ap ra
ae vontenghes
an SAM a anne an Moe nani ae
r ale in WL ra SAN lays on DOOR na
; pew re ae mM we
sts OOOANNNhy MMH ante, Ane
ora (aaa AAR
Ae. Rs allem " - Gt ‘
ee macancnnnan nace ren Q pe VARA 0
p At aha nahianan nl mee WN AAR
AN ANDAR Aas : ~
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 17.
CEEUN OE. DUG:
A GENERAL SUMMARY OF ITS HISTORY, HABITS, ENEMIES, AND OF
THE REMEDIES AND PREVENTIVES TO BE USED AGAINST IT,
By L. O. HOWARD, M. &.,
ASSISTANT ENTOMOLOGIST.
——————_ —= o >} oe ——_—-
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1888.
ea WEPARIMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 17.
PELEN CEE DUG:
A GENERAL SUMMARY OF ITS HISTORY, HABITS, ENEMIES, AND OF
THE REMEDIES AND PREVENTIVES TO BE USED AGAINST IT,
iby, 1. O:. BOW ARD, M. S..
ASSISTANT ENTOMOLOGIST.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFIOE,
1888.
12734—Bull. 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
LETT OL SWIM GUM. (Ole eeccc ed bogus Speacemoas paacHodsoEes bogEes Saoacr
JIN TPROIDUCOMIO IR? ee Mos = 85554 540 Sk Gaontteases Sos Saeaibe a Se. copech sbeeod atuoe
Reasons for publishing at present time, 5—Acknowledgments of assist-
ance, 5.
ASME SO FuNgeee as ese /cyork a)si-.cio =o ania oheimiare aut cla Sisie.eie = aieieis acto e aletn, auste wom eiaiSisie\at =
The Chinch Bug a southern rather than a northern insect, 5—Its early ap-
pearances, 6—First scientifie description, 6—The name ‘‘ Mormon louse,”
6—First recorded appearance in Missouri, lowa, Indiana, and Wiscon-
sin, 6—Damage in 1864 and 1868, 6—Estimates of loss in 1871, 6—The
great injury in 1874, 6—First accurate account of early stages, 7—In-
terest in 1881, 7—Its first injurious appearance in New York, 7—Damage
done in 1887, 7—Table of losses by States and crops, 8—Counties report-
ing loss, 9.
CROGRAPHICAT DISTRIBUTION 5.200 oa0 ee tse eae eee scot sep see ane ses see eee
In New York and New England, 10—In Canada, 10 —In the Southern States,
10—The States most injured, 10—In Cuba, 10—In California, 11—In
Mexico, 12.
RIM REANGND Ae sete ace amiss oss e Poise end on dn, onic neryneis (Snags Sa) onaioepw ais eee
The cultivated grains, 12—Wild grasses, 12—Rice, 13—Probability of a
food-plant outside of the Graminee, 13.
AG HS pOLE GROW Tet —— DS CRNE DIE eae ear ricierisatetae aeiete.n = cieteme stern: ems re ee terete
The egg, 13-—Larval stages, 13—Pupa, 14—Imago, 14—Original descrip-
tion quoted, 14—Le Baron’s description, 15—Fiteh’s varieties, 15—Riley’s
variety melanosus, 15—A new variety, 15.
NUMBE ROSE ROOMS AND ELBE R NATION: seme nl 256 setae oaetocea mea: os sciereeee
Early misconceptions, 15—First accurate statement, 15—Number of broods
south, 16—Hibernation, 16—Influence of severe cold, 17—Odor renders
hibernating places easily found, 17—Osage hedges in the West, 17.
JAS SUIS) i 2 Sie TR eR ce pe ae a ne a ae ey
Flight, 18—Oviposition, 18—Young larve, 19—Rate of growth, 19—Migra-
tions, 19—Their habits on corn, 20—Preparation for hibernation, 20—Er-
roneous statement as to oviposition, 21—Exceptional habits, 21.
NAVI AU ENE MINES JAN DEDISMASM SHE Scent eis = Aeetos 2e eo eee SS coms See
No true insect parasites, 21 —A possible hair-worm parasite, 21—The lady-
bird enemies, 22—The lace-winged fly, 22—True bugs which prey upon
it, 22—Testimony against the efficacy of lady-birds, 23—Vertebrate ene-
mies, 23—Birds, 24--Qnail laws, 24—Diseases, 25—Dr. Shimer’s account
. of the 1865 epidemic, 26—Professor Forbés’ investigations, 27—Professor
Riley’s comments, 28.
DAA EAST ELICE, AUN RUE PDENG HOD UGS) na 2-212 Se\ciaia oy siciw Sates eisic Scion bade ome
Wet weathvr inimical, 28—Professor Forbes’ experiments, 29—Comments,
29—Wet weather and disease, 29—Dr. Thomas’s theory, 30—Professor
Riley’s comments, 31—An anonymous prediction, 31—Table of tempera-
ture and rain-fall in North Carolina, 32—Records of precipitation for 1885,
1886, and 1887, in Chinch Bug States, 32.
I
12
13
15
18
21
28
II
REMEDIES AND PREVENTIVES ...---.--------------------
Early recommendations, 33—Preventives, 33—Clean cultivation, 33—Diver-
BoGus CHINCH BUGS
The False Chinch Bug, 42—The Insidious Flower-bug, 43—The Ash-gray
PIBEIOGRAPHIC AM ISD aia’ etme malate in slo a\eiatebate miele tate te = eaten
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
sified farming, 33—Rotation of crops, 34—Early sowing and manuring,
34—Rolling, 34—Sowing an unattractive crop with wheat, 35— Direct
winter remedies, 35—Burning, 35—Fall plowing and harrowing, 35—Gas
lime, 35—Trapping, 36—Trampling, 36—Direct summer remedies before mi-
gration, 36—Irrigation, 36—Burning, 37-—Prevention of migration—direct
remedies during and after migration, 388—Ditching, 38—Tarred boards or
tar alone, 38—Sowing strips of plants distasteful to the bugs around the
fields to be protected, 39—Sowing strips of favored food around the fields
to be protected, 39—Hot water and soap-suds, 39—Kerosene emulsion,
39—Professor Forbes’ experiments, 39—The Hubbard formula, 40—Major
Tucker’s experiment, 40—Professor Atkinson’s experiments, 40—Pro-
fessor Osborn’s experiments, 41—Mr. Warren’s experiment, 42.
Leaf-bug, 43—The Flea-like Negro-bug, 43—The Striped Flea-beetle, 43.
42
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUR
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., January 3, 1888.
Srr: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 17 from
this Division, being a paper upon the Chinch Bug prepared by my first
assistant, Mr. L. O. Howard, for the forthcoming Annual Report.
There are several important, or what the late Dr. LeBaron called “ first
class,” injurious insects, like the Chinch Bug, which I have so far not
eared to treat of in the publications of the Division, because in past
years, while State Entomologist of Missouri, I had occasion to publish
pretty fully upon them and because there is little opportunity to make
further investigations or experiments upon them in the vicinity of
Washington. I have, however, endeavored to keep a record of every-
thing published in reference to them and of the advance in our knowl-
edge of improved means of controlling them. On account of the great
interest felt just now in the Chinch Bug and the prospect of injury from
it the coming summer in the Mississippi Valley, and from the fact that
the principal work to be done in preventing such injury is winter work,
I have decided, with your approval, to issue this paper in advance as a
bulletin, in order to supply the constant demand for information upon
the insect at the present time. It may be looked upon as an emer-
gency bulletin published because of the probable delay in the appear-
ance of the more bulky annual report beyond the time when the inform
ation will be useful for the coming season.
Respectfully,
C2 ¥. RiELEW.
Entomologist.
Hon. NorMAN J. COLMAN,
Commissioner of Agriculture.
yds si ath
sting nt
al}
arrras
‘iii
Se “ abi ia vy at ie
a ‘oy
—" agit.
renee steph INO be 3 LE Cas
(Blissus leucopterus, Say.)
Order HEMIPTERA ; family LYGA:IDz.
INTRODUCTORY.
The present treatment of the Chinch Bug offers little scope for any-
thing new or original. It is an extremely destructive species which has
been exhaustively treated by former writers and which, after several
years of comparative scarcity, has again become very injurious, so much
so as to occasion the loss of millions of dollars during the past sea-
son and to eall forth the greatest variety of comment from the press of
the country, agricultural or otherwise. In this emergency it happens
that there are no public documents for distribution and even no books
which can be purchased which treat of the life history of and remedies
for this pest. The State reports of Riley and LeBaron are out of print;
the small edition of Bulletin 5 of the U. 8S. Entomological Commission,
by Dr. Thomas, was long since exhausted ; and the recent bulletin and
circular by Forbes treat almost solely of remedies.
It becomes necessary, theretore, to bring out once more a complete
review of the subject. Previous writings, particularly those of Riley,
are freely used, and in many instances the well-known Missouri reports
of my chief are quoted at length.
Observations by Prof. Herbert Osborn, F. M. Webster, W. B. Alwood,
and Miss Mary Murtfeldt, Agents of the Division, are acknowledged as
they are used. Indebtedness to Prof. G. F. Atkinson, of Chapel Hill,
N. C., for observations made in his vicinity, is here acknowledged. The
note-books of the Division of Entomology and the extensive records for
many years collected by Professor Riley have been at my disposal.
PAST HISTORY.
It has been quite generally accepted that the Chinch Bug is, compar-
atively speaking, a Southern rather than a Northern insect, and in so
far as the matter of destructive appearances goes, this idea is well up-
held by its past history. In our section upon geographical distribu-
tion, however, we have shown that the species is by no means confined
to the more Southern States, but that it is often found north of the
5
6 THE CHINCH BUG.
boundary line, in Canada. It was first noticed, so far as we can find,
in North Carolina, at the close of the Revolutionary war, where, as has
been so often stated, it was mistaken for the Hessian fly, which at that
time was attracting considerable notice on Long Island and there-
abouts.
Dr. Fitch, in his second report, gives with some little detail an account
of its early appearances, from which we may simply state that after
this first notice the insect did considerable damage for several years in
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. After a short series of
seasons it was again destructive in North Carolina in 1809, so that in
Orange County the cultivation of wheat was abandoned for two years.
In 1839, in the same States, great damage was done to corn and
wheat, and in 1840 an increase in number occurred, and the wholesale
destruction of the crops was only prevented by an, exceedingly wet
season.
The first scientific description of this species was given by Say in
1831, in a pamphlet, now very scarce, published at New Harmony, Ind.,
entitled “Descriptions of new species of Heteropterous Hemiptera,”
from a single specimen collected on the eastern shore of Virginia, and
it was probably at that time rare in Indiana, where Say resided, at New
Harmony.
It attracted much attention in 1840 in Illinois when it occurred in
numbers in Hancock County, where it was supposed to have been in-
troduced by the Mormons, and was called in consequence the “* Mormon
louse.”
According to Professor Riley, the first recorded appearance of the
insect in Missouri was in 1839. It was again noticed in 1844, and has
been destructive at intervals ever since. In Iowa its first recorded ap-
pearance is in 1847, in Indiana in 1854, and in Wisconsin in 1855.
Highteen hundred and sixty-four was a year marked by damage in
these Western States. In 1868, a season of great drought, much damage
was done by the bugs in Missouri.
In 1871 great damage was done in Illinois, southern Iowa, in parts
of Indiana, in Nebraska, in southern Missouri, and Kansas. It was
estimated by Dr. LeBaron in his second Illinois report that the loss
to the wheat, oat, and barley crops during this year amounted to
$10,500,000 in Illinois alone, and in the other six States mentioned, in-
cluding Indiana, the total loss was upwards of $30,000,000.
In 1874 they occurred again in Missouri and the adjoining States in
exceptional abundance. It was during this season that Professor Riley
sent out circulars to all parts of Missouri and at the close of which he
wrote the extended article which was published in his Seventh Report
on the Insects of Missouri.
He estimated that the total loss to the group of States of which
eastern Kansas forms a center was double that of 1871. Very care-
ful estimates by counties gave an aggregate loss of $19,000,000 for
THE CHINCH BUG. <
Missouri alone, including only the three staple crops of Wheat, Corn,
and Oats. He mentions several facts which tend to show that this esti-
mate is low rather than high. In this report Professor Riley also gave
the first accurate and extended descriptions of the adolescent stages,
including the egg, and noticed the differences between the number of
joints in the tarsi in the young and the adult.
From 1874 to 1881 there were no serious irruptions of this pest, but
in this year it attracted considerable notice and did a great deal of dam-
age in some Western States. Much newspaper literature concern-
ing the insect was published during this year, much of which was
excited by Thomas’s paper upon the “ Relation of Meteorological Condi-
tions to Insect Development and Particularly to the Chinch Bug.” It
was during this year also that the ‘‘Chinch Bug convention” was held
at Windsor, Kans., and it was decided to exclude Wheat from cultiva-
tion as a means of extirpating the pest.
In 1882 the work of the bug upon timothy grass was discovered in
Saint Lawrence County, N. Y., for the first time in its history. It in-
creased and spread in 1883, exciting great alarm, and occasioned several
articles from the pen of Dr. Lintner, who also issued a circular on reme-
dies and anticipating further damage.
Professor Riley in Science (Vol. II, p. 620) and in his Report for 1884
stated that there was little cause for alarm in New York, and indeed no
particular damage has since been recorded. In 1885 some damage was
done in parts of Kansas and Nebraska, and in 1886 stillmore. Bulletin
No. 13 of the Division of Entomology contains reports of considerable
damage in the spring of 1886 from Kansas, Indiana, Ohio, and Ne-
braska and more especially in southern [linois.
During the past year (1887) the injury was marked in these States
and also in some parts of Missouri, but the interesting point in the his-
tory of this season has been the occurrence of the insect in immense
numbers in portions of Virginia and North and South Carolina for the
first time in many years. As a thorough review of the localities and
damage this season is desirable, a statement has been drawn up at my
request by Mr. J. R. Dodge, the statistician of this Department, which
is submitted herewith.
Mr. Dodge reports as follows:
In accordance with your request, I take pleasure in communicating the results of
inquiries mace relative to the geographical distribution of Chinch Bugs during the
past season, and to the extent of their destruction of growing crops.
I find indications of their presence throughout the southern and western States,
but no material injuries to crops are reported except in States bordering on the Mis-
sissippi River and the Lower Missouri. Kansas, part of Nebraska, Missouri, Iowa,
Illinois, southern Wisconsin, and eastern Minnesota include practically the tield of
their serious operations.
They attacked wheat and rye first, then barley and oats, and afterward corn, grass,
millet, sorghum, and broom-corn. As corn, wheat, and oats are the principal tilled
crops of this area, they represent the principal part of the damage.
8 THE CHINCH BUG.
In many places the fields were cleared, and small grain areas were ploughed up.
The pest came in some cases to districts that had never before been ravaged; in many
others the scourge was claimed to be more sweeping than ever before.
The insect was present in injurious numbers in nearly every county in Kansas.
Correspondents in Leavenworth, in the extreme east, and Hamilton, on the Colorado
border, gave the only negative replies. The worst damage was done in this State.
The infliction was general in Missouri, except in a belt in the central part of the
State, not very regular nor wholly untouched, trending northeasterly, and connecting
with a similar belt in Illinois.
Further north, no portion of Iowa was exempt, except the northwest corner of the
State, in proximity to areas of exemption from central Minnesota westwardly through
Dakota, and near to a similar area in northern Nebraska. In eastern Minnesota and
southern Wisconsin, however, the scourge was general and severe. In Illinois com-
parative exemption was enjoyed ina central belt running in a northeasterly direction
from Christian to Champaign, and from Adams to Bureau, fifteen to twenty counties,
in which correspondents responded in the negative as to their destructive presence.
Elsewhere the pest was nearly universal. :
The southwestern corner of Indiana was alive with Chinch Bugs; elsewhere, though
present in much of the area, only about a dozen counties estimated any material
losses. They were still scarcer in Michigan. Only ten counties in Ohio reported
their injurious presence; and a few only in Kentucky indicated material damage.
These insects are reported as more or less injurious in every season of drought and
scarce or absent in all wet areas. In the area of their depredations the crops have
an annual value of more than a fourth of the entire agricultural production of the
United States, and a value nearly four times as great as that of the cotton crop.
It will readily be seen that the losses must be heavy, undoubtedly greater than those
of all other insects together, as no such values are involved in other crops subject to
insect depredations the past year.
The following table has been prepared from data, severely scrutinized, revised, and
accurately consolidated. It makes a large sum, and yet does not comprise all the
damage done to barley and rye, millet, etc., all of which might be approximately
stated in round numbers as $60,000,000. The record by States is as follows:
Corn. Wheat. Oats.
States. seer
Bushels. Value. | Bushels. “Bosbels. | Vatae, Value. Bushels. Value.
tee = 2
Kentucky 983,280 | $521, 188 66, 678 $48,675 li Soca. cae BER Smee ses
MIO ese nce ce et 885, 564 425, O71 215, 370 161, 528 60, 196 $19, 263
Indiana ....... ---| 1,785, 000 | 803, 250 | 453, 936 326. 834 167, 658 48, 621
Illinois...... ----| 16,929,600 | 6, 941, 136 | 5, 529, 150 3 870, 405 3, 810, 310 1, 028, 784
Wisconsin | 1, 804, 250 757, 785 | 3,004, 490 1,922) 874 | 1, 742, 750 487, 970
Minnesota 2,169, 720 | 802, 796 | 9, 074. 750 5, 354, 103 | 2, 438, 160 633, 922
TL Oconee ee oe 22,020,240 | 7,707,084 | 6,977,620 | 4,256,348 | 4,462,920 1,071,101
IMUANOMIT 53,2 noscas~ ence ese: 15, 504, 390 5, 736, 624 1, 664, 640 il 032, 077 795, 860 206, 924
LCE E: ps I RS BN 16, 840, 340 6, 230, 926 | 2, 282, 100 | rs 392, 081 6, 406, 560 2, 438, 497
otal? 12 5. ues Sere tare 78, 922, 384 | 29, 925, 810 | 29, 268, 734 | 18, 364, 925 | 19, 884,414 | 5, 935, 082
|
Respectfully,
J. R. DODGE,
Statistician.
Accompanying these statements of Mr. Dodge were a number of
State maps indicating the counties reporting to the Department damage
from the Chinch Bug. Many other localities had Chinch Bugs in abund-
ance and considerable damage was done in States not represented in
THE CHINCH BUG. 9
this list. These localities, however, are authoritative, and their reports
furnished the main basis for the table which precedes. We may sum-
marize these briefly as follows:
Illinois, fifty-one counties, as follows: Stephenson, Winnebago, Lake, Carroll, Lee,
Kendall, Will, La Salle, Rock, Mercer, Warren, Stark, Iroquois, Vermillion, Edgar,
Douglas, Coles, Moultrie, Shelby, Cumberland, Clark, Jasper, Effingham, Fayette,
Bond, Madison, Macoupin, Greene, Pike, Jersey, Saint Clair, Clinton, Washington,
Marion, Clay, Lawrence, Wabash, Edwards, White, Hamilton, Franklin, Randolph,
Jackson, Williamson, Saline, Gallatin, Johnson, Pope, Hardin, Massac, and Alexander.
Indiana, twenty-five counties, as follows: Elkhart, Jasper, White, Huntington,
Wells, Blackford, Jay, Warren, Montgomery, Wayne, Shelby, Johnson, Sullivan,
Greene, Dearborn, Knox, Martin, Ohio, Gibson, Pike, Dubois, Posey, Vanderburgh,
Warrick, and Spencer.
Iowa, sixty-one counties, as follows: Winnebago, Worth, Mitchell, Howard, Win-
neshick, Allamakee, Clayton, Fayette, Chickasaw, Floyd, Cerro Gordo, Hancock,
Palo Alto, Pocahontas, Humboldt, Franklin, Dubuque, Buchanan, Grundy, Hamilton,
Webster, Calhoun, Sac, Crawford, Carroll, Greene, Story, Marshall, Tama, Benton,
Linn, Jackson, Clinton, Scott, Muscatine, Iowa, Jasper, Dallas, Guthrie, Audubon,
Shelby, Madison, Mahaska, Keokuk, Des Moines, Henry, Monroe, Lucas, Union,
Adams, Montgomery. Mills, Fremont, Page, Taylor, Decatur, Wayne, Appanoose,
Davis, Van Buren, Lee.
Kansas, sixty-three counties, as follows: Cheyenne, Rawlins, Norton, Phillips,
Jewell, Washington, Marshall, Nemaha, Brown, Wyandotte, Jefferson, Jackson,
Shawnee, Douglas, Pottawatomie, Riley, Wabaunsee, Davis, Clay, Cloud, Mitchell,
Rooks, Graham, Sheridan, Thomas, Sherman, Gove, Russell, Lincoln, Ottawa, Ells-
worth, Saline, Dickinson, Morris, Osage, Franklin, Miami, Linn, Anderson, Coffey,
Chase, Marion, McPherson, Rice, Barton, Rush, Ness, Lane, Scott, Ford, Pawnee,
Stafford, Reno, Sedgwick, Allen, Neosho, Cherokee, Labette, Chatauqua, Cowley,
Sumner, Barbour, Comanche.
Kentucky, eight counties, as follows: Carroll, Pendleton, Bracken, Estill, Mercer,
Union, Ballard, Marshall.
Michigan, five counties, as follows: Manitou, Presque Isle, Saginaw, Shiawassee,
Saint Joseph.
Minnesota, twenty-seven counties, as follows: Hubbard, Wadena, Todd, Crow Wing,
Kanabec, Pine, Isanti, Chisago, Sherburne, Stearns, Wright, Carver, Scott, Rice, Wa-
basha, Winona, Olmstead, Dodge, Steele, Waseca, Watonwan, Martin, Faribault,
Freeborn, Mower, Fillmore, and Houston.
Missouri, sixty counties, as follows: Atchison, Nodaway, Holt, Worth, Gentry, Har-
rison, Mercer, Putnam, Sullivan, Adair, Linn, Clinton, Caldwell, Ray, Chariton, Ran-
dolph, Lincoln, Saint Charles, Callaway, Copper, Johnson, Cass, Bates, Henry, Saint
Clair, Hickory, Osage, Maries, Gasconade, Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, Sainte
Genevieve, Perry, Iron, Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Mississippi, New Madrid, Butler,
Wayne, Oregon, Shannon, Pulaski, Laclede, Wright, Douglas, Ozark, Christian, Web-
. ster, Dallas, Hickory, Polk, Cedar, Dade, Barton, Lawrence, Barry, Newton, and Mc-
Donald.
Ohio, ten counties, as follows: Defiance, Wood, Geauga, Allen, Shelby, Darke, Frank-
lin, Fairfield, Meigs, and Gallia.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.
East of the Rocky Mountains the Chinch Bug seems to be indigenous
North and South, feeding naturally upon various species of wild grasses
and becoming multiplied wherever the cultivation of wheat has reached
its original haunts.
10 THE CHINCH BUG.
It was first noticed, as stated in the last section, in North Carolina,
and Say’s original description was published from a Virginia specimen.
Fitch records the fact that he had collected specimens in New York,
but that it was exceedingly rare. Signoret also records it from New
York, and, as we have just shown, it appeared in 1883 in destructive
numbers in the northern part of this State. Harris in the first edition
of his well-known work states that it does not occur in New England,
but in a foot-note to his second edition states that while the sheet was
passing through the press he discovered a single specimen in his own
garden at Cambridge (June 17, 1852). And in 1883, according to Dr.
George Dimmock (Psyche, November, December, 1883, p. 119), the
lowland between Belmont and Cambridge was swarming with them.
They have also been collected by Dr. Packard at Salem, Mass., in Maine,
and at the summit of Mount Washington in New Hampshire. Dr.
Lintner records the fact that Mr. H. L. Fernald captured one or more
specimens in 1879, 1880, and 1882, at Orono, Me.
In Canada they occurred at Grimsby, Ontario, in 1866, and were sent
from that point in that year to Mr. Walsh. Mr. W. Hs, Harrington col-
lected specimens found abundantly at Sydney, Cape Breton (N. lat. 46°
18’) in September, 1884 (Can. Ent., November, 1884, p. 218). Dr. Fitch
received specimens from western Pennsylvania, and also stated that it
was sent him from Mississippi with the information that in sume years
it damaged the crops of Indian corn. We have found it personally in
considerable numbers in the rice fields near Savannah, Ga., and Mr. EB.
A. Schwarz and others have collected itin Florida. In the latter State
Mr. Schwarz found it very abundantly at Biscayne Bay, breeding in
the wingless form only in considerable numbers upon Sand Oats (Uni-
ola paniculata). Mr. Webster has noticed it in Mississippi and Louisi-
ana. It has also been collected in this same form, upon the same
plant, on the sea-shore at Fortress Monroe, Va., by Messrs. Schwarz
and Heidemann. The States, however, in which it does the greatest
damage’ are Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Indiana,
Kentucky, Tennessee, Illinois, southern Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri,
Kansas, and Nebraska. Uhlerrecords the species from Texas, Califor-
nia, Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Michigan, and
generally throughout the Atlantic region.
Outside of the United States it is recorded only from Cuba (see
-Signoret ‘‘ Essai Monographique du Genre Micropus, Spinola ;” Ann.
Soc. Ent. France, V, 3d series, 1857, p. 31), and the Cuban individuals
are long-winged, while Mr. Schwarz never found a long-winged indi-
vidual in Florida, in spite of the fact that he has collected in localities
the insect fauna of which is in the main Cuban. This observation con-
flicts with the general observation of Mr. Uhler that the short-winged
form seems to be more common in New England than in the Southern
States.
The only authentic published record of the occurrence of the Chinch Bug
west of the Rocky Mountains is the mere mention by Uhler, in his list of
THE CHINCH BUG. Tt
the Hemiptera of the region west of the Mississippi River (Bull. Hayden
Surv. I, 306), of California as one of the States which it inhabits, but
this record has been overlooked by Californians. Its advent upon the
Pacific slope has been expected and dreaded. Matthew Cooke in his
book, published in 1883, npon injurious insects of the Orchard, Vine-
yard, etc., figured and described it, and under the head of ‘‘ Remedies ”
wrote, “Should the pest appear in this State it can be prevented,” ete.
— In June, 1885, there were several newspaper reports on the occurrence
of this insect in great numbers in California. Toe San Francisco Even-
ing Post for June 23, 1885, quoting from the Woodland Democrat, pub-
lished the statement:
Messrs. Frazee and Henderson, who live southwest of Woodland, brought to this
office a bottle of this pestiferous insect (chinch bug) on Tuesday. Mr. Henderson
says that he recognized them as the same eastern variety that frequently does so
much injury to wheat in Missonri. These gentlemen say they discovered the bugs
traveling between the lands of Day and Clanton. There are millions of them, but as
to the extent of country covered they are unable to say. The bugsare nearly grown
and are just beginning to have wings. As soon as the wings develop they fly and
scatter everywhere. Mr. Frazee says there is no danger from them this year as the
grain is too far advanced.
So far this item seems very plausible, but it goes on to state “ that
another gentleman had noticed them injuring grape-vines” which of
course introduces a probability of wrong identification.
There is no question, however, but that the Chinch Bug is to be found at
present in California, but there is no assurance of its existence in injuri-
ous numbers. Our certainty as to its presence arises from the fact that
a single specimen of a short-winged variety of this insect is among a lot
collected in the vicinity of San Francisco in 1885 by Mr. Koebele. It
is unquestionably a true Chinch Bug. Another specimen of the same
variety was collected in 1884 by some students of Johns Hopkins Uni-
versity who summered in California and was given to Mr. Lugger, of
this Division, who was at that time connected with the University.
Recent communications from California in answer to inquiries on this
point show that the insect is not known to the entomologists in that
State. The False Chinch Bug (Nysius angustatus) has been, we learn
from Mr. Koebele, very destructive to grapes in that State the past sea-
son, and it is more than likely that this is the insect referred to in the
newspaper article justquoted. Mr. Koebele writes that the False Chinch
was so abundant around Alameda in July that in an old road at least
50 specimens could be counted under each plant of Polygonum aviculare.
He made, in 1887, a most careful search of the locality in which he found
the 1885 specimen, but could not find a single additional individual.
He also examined the large collection of Hemiptera in the California
Academy of Sciences without success. The following paragraph is from
Mr. Coquiliett’s answer to our inquiries:
I have never met with the Chinch Bug in any part of California that I have visited—
neither in Merced County, around the city of Sacramento, nor on the southern part of
12 THE CHINCH BUG.
the State, where I have collected Hemiptera extensively with the sweep-net. Dr.
Rivers, curator of the museum at our State University, writes me that three years
ago he took three specimens of a bug that looked much like the Chinch Bug, but was
darker and smaller, and he does not believe that they belonged to this species; they
were taken in Sonoma County, and were sent off, he knows not where. He has col-
lected Hemiptera extensively since then, but the Chinch Bug is not among them.
Mr. Wickson, editor of the Pacific Rural Press, writes me that he has ‘‘ never seen a
specimen nor heard of one as being recognized by an observer whom I would con-
sider as capable of recognizing the insect.”
Since writing the above we have learned trom Mr. Ubler that he has
seen specimens of the Chinch Bug from California of along winged form,
which were collected near San Francisco, probably by Mr. Henry Ed-
wards. He has also seen specimens from Cuba and from Tamaulipas,
Mexico.
FOOD PLANTS. -
The Chinch Bug willfeed upon all grains and grasses so far as known.
The most prominent crops which are seriously injured are Wheat, Barley,
and Indian Corn. The testimony in regard to Oats is conflicting, but
Le Baron’s conclusion to the effect that “if this grain be sown where
Chineh Bugs abound, and especially if it is sown exclusively, it. will be
damaged to a greater or less extent the first year, but that the bugs will
probably not continue to breed in it to any great extent in succeeding
years” is unquestionably correct. Broom-corn, Sorghum, Chicken-corn,
Hungarian grass, Millet, Rye, Rice, Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon),
Fox-tail grass (Setaria glauca), Timothy (Phloeum pratense), Blue-grass
(Poa pratensis), Crab-grass (Panicum sanguinale), Bottle-grass (Setaria
viridis), and all of our wild grasses, so far as known, are attacked, but
beyond these no food plant has ever been authentically recorded. Re-
ports of damage done to other crops, such as grape-vines and garden
crops, are the result of mistaken identity, and an error in the compila-
tion of Packard’s Guide to the Study of Insects has doubtless done much
to perpetuate the idea that this insect is a more general feeder. This
was corrected in the later editions of this work, probably at the sug-
gestion in Professor Riley’s criticism in his 7th Rept. Ins. Mo., p. 26.
Upon the Sand Oats (Uniola paniculata) in Florida Mr. Schwarz no-
ticed that the entire development of the insect is undergone upon the
highest part of this tall plant and not close to the bottom as in our lat-
itude. The probable reason for. this, as he has pointed out, is, that
the strong winds are continually blowing fine, sharp sand through the
lower parts of the plants, rendering it impossible for the bugs to remain
at these places and forcing them to seek their nourishment higher up.
Concerning Timothy and the Crab-grasses Professor Forbes says:
It seems to prefer timothy to blue-grass, not really relishing either as a general
thing, and takes to the crab-grasses (Punicum) not at all, or only as a last resort.
(Bull. No. 2, State Ent. Il.)
This generalization is undoubtedy correct for Illinois and the sur-
rounding States, but, as Professor Forbes himself points out in a foot-
THE CHINCH BUG. 13
note, the bugs did great damage to Timothy in northern New York in
1883, and the following extract from a letter recently received from
Professor Atkinson, of North Carolina, indicates that in that State at
least the Crab-grass becomes an important item of the insect’s diet.
* * * Thave recently discovered that at this season of the year (October 2) the
chinch bug feeds on the “ crab-grass ” so common in cultivated and waste places,
and especially so abundant in many of the corn-fields after cultivation has ceased.
The chinch bug must go to grass after the corn becomes mature and no longer yields.
the sap. I have found the bugs inside thesheath and clear evidence of their having
punctured the culm. No doubt this grass affords them subsistence fur quite a period
of time and then shelter for the winter. * * * Ihave found within the past few
days pup or wingless individuals on the crab-grass. * * *
Referring again to Timothy we may state that a meadow of this grass
on the farm of J. F. Whiton, near Wakeman, Huron County, Ohio, was
injured considerably by the bugs in 1886. Professor Forbes,. however
(Bull. 2), gives an instance where sowing Timothy with Fall Wheat
was probabably the cause of the salvation of the crop.
On cultivated Rice we found Chinch Bugs very generally scattered
throughout the large rice-fields near Savannah, Ga., in August, 1881.
Only adult specimens were found at that time and all were fully winged,
and were found upon the heads of the grain, to which they had proba-
bly flown, as the fields had been flooded for some time previously. No
particular damage to the crop was perceptible, unless their punctures
contribute to bring about the disease known as “ white blast,” as sug-
gested by Pr ofessor Riley in his Annual Report for 188182, page 137.
We shall probably be obliged to widen our close restriction of the
Chinch Bug food plants, to admit at least one of the Polygonums. A
chance statement by Mr. Bruner that he had known this insect to feed
upon the so called *‘ Wild Buckwheat” in Nebraska led to a letter of
close inquiry, to which he replied that there can be no mistake and that
the plant is either Polygonum dumetorum, or P. convolvulus.
STAGES OF GROWTH—DESCRIPTIVE.
The following descriptive matter is from Professor Riley’s Seventh
Report on the Insects of Missouri, and is fuller and more careful than
that published elsewhere. It will be noticed that there are three larval
stages, necessitating two molts before the pupa and three before the
adult. It will also be noticed that the larve have but two joints to
the feet, while the adults have three :
The Egg.—(F¥ig. la, b.) Average length 0.03 inch, elongate oval, the diameter
scarcely one-fifth the length. The top squarely docked, and surmounted with four
small rounded tubercles near the center. Color when newly laid, pale-and whitish
and translucent, acquiring with age an amber color, and finally showing the red parts
of the embryo, and especially the eyes toward the tubercled end. The size increases
somewhat after deposition, and will sometimes reach near 0.04 in length.
Larval Stages.—The newly-hatched larva (Fig. 1c) is pale yellow, with simply an
orange stain on the middle of the three larger abdominal joints. The form scarcely
at THE CHINCH BUG.
differs from that of the mature bug, being but slightly more elongate; but the tarsi
have but two joints (Fig. 4d), and the head is relatively broader and more rounded,
while the joints of body are sub-equal, the prothoracic joint being but slightly longer
than any of the rest. The red color soon pervades the whole body, except the first
two abdominal joints, which remain yellowish, and the members, which remain pale.
After the first molt (Fig. le) the red is quite bright vermilion, contrasting strongly
with the pale band across the middle of the body, the prothoracic joint is relatively
longer, and the metathoracic relatively shorter. The head and prothorax are dusky
and coriaceous, and two broad marks on mesothorax, two smaller ones on metathorax,
two on the fourth and fifth abdominal sutures, and one at tip of abdomen are gen-
erally visible, but sometimes obsolete; the third and fourth joints of antennx are
dusky, but the legs still pale. After the second molt (Fig. 1f) the head and thorax are
quite dusky, and the abdomen duller red, but the pale transverse band is still dis-
tinct; the wing-pads become apparent, the members are more dusky, there is a dark
red shade on the fourth and fifth abdominal joints, and, ventrally, a distinct circular
dusky spot covering the last three joints.
Fig. 1.
IMMATURE STAGES OF CHINCH Buc. —a, b, eggs; c, newly-hatched larva; d, its tarsus; e, larva after
first molt; f, same after second molt; g, pupa—the natural sizes indicated at sides ; hk, enlarged leg of
perfect bug; j, tarsus of same still more enlarged ; i, proboscis or beak, enlarged.—[ After Riley. ]
Pupa.—(Fig. 1,9.) In the pupa the coriaceous parts are brown-black, the wing-
pads extend almost across the two pale abdominal joints which are now more dingy,
while the general color of the abdomen is dingy gray; the body above is slightly
pubescent, the members are colored as inthe mature bug; the three-jointed tarsus is
foreshadowed, and the dark horny spots at tip of abdomen, both above and below,
are larger. ; ;
Imago.—(Fig. 2.) The perfect insect has been well described
[Fic. 2.] and I will append the original description:
Lygaeus leucopterus (Chinch Bug). Blackish; hemelytra
white, with a black spot.
Inhabits Virginia.
Body long, blackish, with numerous hairs. Antenne,
rather short hairs; second joint yellowish, longer than the
third; ultimate joint rather longer than the second, thickest;
thorax tinged cinereous before, with the basal edge piceous;
hemelytra white, with a blackish ovalspot on the lateral mid-
dle; rostrum and feet honey yellow; thighs a little dilated.
Length less than three-twentieths of an inch.
I took a single specimen on the eastern shore of Virginia.
t The whiteness of the hemelytra, in which is a blackish
spot strongly contrasted distinguishes this species readily
Onmouye; Haltineyn (Say, Am. Entomology, I, p. 929), et
ral size. [After Riley.] | The above description originally appeared in 1832 in a pam-
phlet entitled ‘“‘Descriptions of new species of Heteropterous
Hemiptera of N, A.”
THE CHINCH BUG. 15
Length 1} lines, of three-twentieths of an inch. Body black, clothed with a very
fine grayish down, not distinctly visible to the naked eye; basal joint of the antenne
honey yellow ; second joint of the same tipped with black; third and fourth joints,
black ; beak brown; wings and wing-cases white; the latter are black at their in-
sertion, and have near the middle two short irregular black lines, and a conspicuous
black marginal spot; legs dark honey yellow, terminal joint of the feet, and the
claws black. (Dr. Wm. LeBaron in the Prairie Farmer for September, 1850, Vol. X,
pp. 280, 281, where the name of Rhyparochromus devastator is proposed for it.)
Dr. Fitch also enumerates the following varieties of this insect : as
a, immarginatus.—Basal margin of the thorax not edged with yellowish. Common.
b, dimidiatus.—Basal half of the thorax deep velvety black, anterior half grayish.
Comn on.
c, fulvivenosus.—The stripes on the wing-covers tawny yellow instead of black.
d, albivenosus.—Wing-covers white, without any black marks except the marginal
spot. A male.
e, apterus.—Wingless and the wing-covers much shorter than the abdomen. (Fig.3.)
f, basalis.—Basal joint of the antenne dusky and darker
than the second. (Fic. 3.]
g, nigricornis.—T wo first joints of the antenne blackish.
h, femoratus.—Legs pale livid yellow, the thighs tawny red.
Common.
i, rufipedis.—Legs dark tawny red or reddish brown.
To these varieties, all of which occur with us, I would
add one which may be known as melanosus, in which the
normal white of the wings is quite dusky, and contains addi-
tional black marks at base and toward tip, and in which all
the members and the body except the rufous hind edge of
thorax are jet black.
In addition te these varieties mentioned by Dr.
Riley, an interesting form has been collected by Mr.
E. A. Schwarz at Lake Worth, Fla., and by Mr. O. Shemp ingen, Caiey
Heidemann at Fortress Monroe, Va. This variety
is at once distinguished from other short-winged varieties by its more
slender and pointed wing-pads, and by the color of the antenne, the first
three joints of which are honey yellow, while the last joint or club is
nearly black. It seems also to be more thickly clothed with silvery
pile, but this is probably due to the fact that the specimens studied were
mounted dry, while all others which I have seen have evidently been
placed in alcohol. This variety, so far as we know, has been collected
on the sea-shore only.
: NUMBER OF BROODS AND HIBERNATION.
For many years there existed a misconception concerning the number
of broods of insects in the West. It was always understood that there
was more than one brood, and some newspaper writers insisted that
there are as many as five or sixannual generations. Professor Riley, in
the Practical Entomologist, Vol. I (March 26, 1866), was first to publish
the definite statement that the Chinch Bug is two-brooded in northern
Illinois, and Dr. Shimer the succeeding year published the same state-
16 THE CHINCH BUG.
ment from his own observations. This number of annual generations
holds through the entire northwest and as far south, certainly, as the
latitude of Saint Louis. Thomas states that there is some evidence of an
occasional third brood in the extreme southern part of Illinois and in
Kentucky, but that itis not sufficient to justify him in stating it as a
fact, or to satisfy him of its correctness. In North Carolina there seems
no question but that the second generation gave birth to still a third,
which, as we are informed by Professor Atkinson of Chapel Hill, was
found in a half-grown condition on Crab-grass about the 1st of Octo-
ber. November 17 most of the specimens found in the same locations
were full-grown. This third generation probably hibernates in the adult
condition. ;
The Chinch Bug passes the winter in the perfect state. As cold
weather approaches, most of the full-grown bugs leave the hardened
corn-stalks or wild grasses upon which they have been attempting to
feed, and seek some convenient shelter in which to pass the winter. They
collect in fence cracks, in sheds, hay stacks, straw stacks, corn-shucks,
under leaves, mulching, and rubbish of all kinds upon the ground, under
the loose bark of adjacent trees, in stumps and logs, under stones and
clods of earth, in fact in any situation which will offer shelter. They
seem to prefer dry situations. Bunches of old dead grass and weeds offer
them a particularly attractive place for hibernation. Professor Atkin-
son writes us that the Crab-grass in North Carolina not only affords the
bugs sustenance after the corn-stalks harden, but also gives them shel-
ter for the winter, as they work their way down between the leaf-sheath
and the stalk. Mr. J.O. Alwood writes us from Columbus, Ohio, that,
October 26, 1887, he observed them lying torpid within the leaf-sheaths
of an uncut field of Pearl Millet. During cold weather they remain tor-
pid. On a warm, sunshiny day they will stretch their legs and begin
to move about to a slight extent; but as the cold becomes severe they
press back deeper into their hiding places. They can withstand the
severest cold, and in fact, as with so many other hibernating insects,
the more sustained the cold weather the more the insects winter
successfully. An instance is related by a reliable correspondent of
Dr. Thomas’ in which the bugs frozen into ice were thawed and
when warm manifested signs of life, crawling about as in the spring.
Dr. Shimer’s observations upon this point are sufficiently interesting to
quote:
After the early autumn frosts they left their feeding-grounds on foot in search of
winter quarters ; none could be seen on the wing as at harvest time. For a winter
retreat they resorted to any convenient shelter they might chance to find, as long
grass, weeds, boards, pieces of wood, rails, fallen-tree leaves, ete.
In January, 1865, I next examined their condition. Those that I found in the
sheaths of the corn-leaves above the snow, and had been thus exposed during the pre-
vious severe weather—when for several days the thermometer was 15° to 20° below
zero—were invariably found dead without exception, and those beneath the snow
THE CHINCH BUG. 17
were alive. This observation was made in the common farm corn-fields, as they
might be found anywhere all over the wide country, for in autumn the chinch bugs
remained in great numbers in the corn-husks and under the sheaths of the blades as
wellas in other winter retreats. Upon various occasions, as the winter advanced, I
brought in corn-husks filled with ice, inclosing the chinch bugs in the crystallized
element; when the ice was thawed they were able to run, apparently unaffected by
that degree of cold. Itis therefore proved that these insects possess vitality suffi-
cient to withstand the effect of a temperature below the freezing-point, and perhaps
below zero, as must have been their condition in these ice-bound husks; but when in
the open air, exposed to the sweeping prairie winds, 15° to 20° degrees below zero,
for a long time, they succumb to the cold..
March 7, 1865, the snow having cleared off from the ground, I examined the condi-
tion of a host of these chinch bugs that had chosen for their winter covering cord-
wood sticks lying on the ground, entirely surrounded by frost and ice ; of these 20 per
cent. were living; those that were more fortunate in their selection of winter quarters
fared much better. From a single handful of leaves picked up at one grasp from be-
neath an appie tree I obtained 335 living and 312 dead chinch bugs; and of their lady-
bird enemies that had entered the same winter quarters with them, 50 were living
and 10 dead. Of these chinch bugs I placed a number in comfortable quarters in the
house in a small pasteboard box, not in a stove room, together with some coleopterous
insects casually gathered among the chinch bugs; after one month I found the latter
all dead and the former living.
The entire month of March was rain, snow, thawing, freezing, alternately, seeming
to be very uncomfortable for any living creature to remain out of doors with so poor
a shelter and on top of the ground.
April 1-6, I again made repeated examinations of these chinch bugs in their winter
quarters, and found about the same proportions of them living as noted on the 7th
of March. At this time they wandered away on foot from their winter quarters.
Mr. G. A. Waters, in the Farmers’ Review for October 19, 1887, gives.
the following interesting observation bearing on the same point:
In 1881-82 I observed a bunch of fodder that had fallen into a ditch that the heavy
rains had washed near by a shock. The fodder had been overflowed with water,,
which had stood over the fodder long enough for a sheet of ice to form over it. The
water subsiding in a few days and some thaw occurring, I pulled the stalks out
of the mud to get the ears of corn off, and in husking the ears found quite a number
of chinch bugs which had been immersed for a week or more. On exposing them to-
the warm sun they crawled around lively.
Where they are hibernating in numbers they can often be detected
more readily by their strong “ bed-buggy” odor than by sight, as was
pointed out by Dr. Riley. Dr. Lintner, in October, 1883, found this
method of searching for them more convenient and infallible than look-
ing for them.
Mr. Bruner calls our attention to the fact that the Osage and other
brushy hedges in the West are great collectors of leaves and trash
blown there by winds, and that they form exceptionally good hibernat-
ing places for the Chinch Bugs, which take advantage of them in great
numbers. So great a nuisance are the hedges from this point of view,
that Mr. Bruner seriously advocates their gradual removal and the sub-
stitution of a less compact division between fields.
12734—Bull. 17 2
18 THE CHINCH BUG.
HABITS.
With the warm days of spring the hibernating individuals issue from
their winter quarters and copulate. Dr. Shimer has described a love-
flight which he noticed at this time. The date was May 16, 1865, and
the atmosphere was swarming with Chinch Bugs on the wing. As
shown by Walsh and Riley (Am. Ent., I, 173) it is probable that this
occurrence was exceptional, and that the insects do not normally mate
in this way; that the swarming flight was the result of a great abun-
dance of the insects. The insect flies in spring and fall, and also some-
what in late July and early August, as the first brood becomes winged.
In the fall they attain wings as the corn hardens, and their flight is
then the result of a starvation impulse. In July and August the flight
of the fledged individuals of the first brood is not yery common, except
when they occur in exceptionally great numbers. During the past sea-
son Professor Osborn observed them coupling at Ames prior to July
‘25, while upon this date he observed them swarming in the air, flying
past his window in immense numbers and with the wind (southeast to
northwest). They were first noticed shortly after 1 p.m. July 27
they were again noticed on the wing, but not in such great numbers as
before. They were flying with the wind, from northwest to southeast.
August 3 hosts of them were observed on the wing, while others were
coupling on the ground. Others were observed coupling as late as
August 16. The majority of the hibernating individuals seem, from
the evidence, to copulate in the spring and without flying, but, accord-
ing to Professor Riley, many of them make love in the fall preparatory
to seeking winter quarters, and Mr. James O. Alwood, of Columbus,
Ohio, writes that he found them copulating in a ficld of uneut Pearl
Millet at the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station as late as October
27, 1887.
The eggs of the Chinch Bug, which we have already described, and
which are figured at Fig. 1, a, b, are laid in the spring for the first
brood, and usually underground and upon the roots of plants infested.
They are, however, often found above ground upon the withered
sheaths near the bases of the grain stalks or often upon the blades of
theleaves. They are deposited in small clusters. Professor Riley says:
A wheat plant pulled from an infested field in the spring of the year will gener-
ally reveal hundreds of these eggs attached to the roots, and at a somewhat later
period the yonng larvx will be found clustering on the same and looking like so many
moving atoms.
The eggs are not specially small when we consider the small size of
the female which lays them. Dr. Shimer says that each female lays 500,
and this seems very large until we reflect that they are not all deposited
at once, and that after the laying of the first few others are probably
developing in the ovaries, for the process of oviposition occupies from
ten days to three weeks. It has long been known that the eggs were laid
in the ground, although an accurate description was much more recently
THE CHINCH BUG. 19
drawn up. The relative abundance of the eggs upon the stalks and
upon the roots may be changed somewhat, as Dr. Thomas has pointed
out, by the character of the soil. Where the soil is very damp the
majority of the eggs are doubtless laid upon the stalks, whereas if the
earth is dry and easily penetrated the great majority of them will
be found upon the rootlets and upon the stalks beneath the ground.
According to Professor Riley the eggs hatch on the average in two
weeks. The young larve begin to take nourishment as soon as possi-
ble after hatching. They insert their beaks sometimes even before they
emerge from the earth, but more often crawl up the stalk before be-
ginning to pump. They growl with considerable rapidity and swarm
over the stalk upon which they were born, walking about with ease
and wandering from one stalk to another if occasion demands. As we
have already shown, four molts are undergone before the insect reaches
the perfect state, and generally from five to seven weeks elapse from
thehatching tothe final molt. Dr. Shimer’s repeated observations show
that at Mount Carrcll, [lL., the imago usually appears in from fifty-
seven to sixty days after the laying of the eggs, and about forty-two days
from the hatching of the larve. By the time the majority of theinsects
of this first generation are full-grown, or even before, the wheat has
become too hard to offer them much nourishment, or harvest time has
arrived, and they begin to migrate in search of food. Neighboring corn-
fields offer a more tempting diet, and in seasons of great abundance
they march in numerous colonies, moving by a common impulse from the
wheat to the corn. Strange to say, although the commoner form pos-
sesses wings the insect does not generally take flight, but prefers to walk
along the ground. Occasionally, however, at this time they take wings
and scatter. This, however, is rarer when the insects are plentiful than
when they are comparatively scarce. Under no circumstances will
these insects take flight to escape danger. Dr. Shimer says:
No threatening danger, however imminent, whether of being driven over by grain-
reapers, wagons, or of being trodden under foot, will prompt it to use its wings to es-
cape. I have tried all imaginable ways to induce them to fly, as by thrashing among
them with bundles of rods or grass, by gathering them up and letting them fall from
a height, etc., but they invariably refused entirely to use their wings in escaping from
danger. :
The migration takes place often, and, according to some authors,
usually before the majority of the brood have attained full growth.
There are always many immature individuals among a large host, and
often the army is composed almost entirely of such. In fact, at these
times there is apt to be a general confusion of so-called larva, pupe,
and adults, owing to the fact that some hibernating females oviposit
much in advance of others and to the other fact, previously mentioned,
that a single female takes several days or even weeks to lay all of her
eggs. Professor Forbes records egg-laying presumably by hibernating
individuals from the last week in May (at Decatur) until the last week in
June (at Warsaw), thus making certain individuals of the first brood one
20 THE CHINCH BUG.
month later in development’ than others, in two localities not far distant
(140 miles) and of about the same latitude. There are many accounts
in print which are almost incredible tales of the size of these migrating
hordes, and yet they are probably only too true.
Dr. Thomas states that the migration upon foot seldom exceeds 80
rods, but the winged individuals fly to much greater distances. In-
stance was given in the Farmers’ Review for August 17, 1887, where a
little patch of sweet corn grown in the midst of pine woods in northern
Wisconsin, 8 miles from a cultivated crop of any kind, was badly in-
fested with the Chinch Bug. This appearance of the bugs probably re-
sulted from the flight thereto of mature individuals.
It naturally results from the wide difference in the method of growth
of the crops that the Chinch Bugs after migrating from wheat to corn
appear to be much more numerous upon the latter crop than they were
upon the former, in spite of the great numbers usually killed in the act
of migrating; for a single stalk of corn will be obliged to support the
Chinch Bugs from a great many stalks of wheat. Moreover, the bugs
swarm upon the first few rows and destroy them before invading the
entire field generally. The outer rows, of course, under these circum-
stances are often black with bugs. The pupze work their way down
between the leaves and the stalks and there cast their skins and issue
as adult insects. The leaf sheath is often thus completely filled with
exuvie. The eggs for the second brood are also often if not usually -
deposited in this same situation—behind the sheaths of the lower
leaves—and on hatching the young bugs remain there feeding and
growing, and casting skins, sometimes even until the advent of cold
weather and their consequent winter torpor. Others issue from these
sheaths, particularly when they are especially abundant, or failing to
find satisfactory locations on the outer rows take wings and fly to the
center of the field and become generally scattered. They feed upon the
Corn or Rye as the case may be, and upon the surrounding grasses or in
the fields of Millet or Hungarian grass until the approach of fall, by
which time nearly all are once more full-grown. Mr. Webster observed
them at Lafayette, Ind.,in August, 1887, forcing themselves down into cut
stubble of Setaria glauca for the purpose of undergoing the last molt.
He counted upwards of twenty in a single stalk. Wemay mention in
this connection, as reported to us by Prof. Osborn and also as published
in the Country Gentleman for August 25, 1877, that President Cham-
berlain, of the lowa Agricultural College, dug a single root of Hungarian
grass at Ames, Lowa, the first week in August upon which were counted
3,025 bugs. Harth was removed with the root to the depth of 3 inches.
(1 inch surface), in all about 4 cubic inches.
In the north the majority of them are ready to hibernate by the time
the field corn is harvested. Farther south, however, the corn grows
too hard for them and considerable time before the weather is cold
enough to compel them to seek winter shelter. In North Carolina, as
THE CHINCH BUG. 2
we have already shown, a third brood has appeared by the time the
corn becomes hard, and the bugs seek the Crab-grass and there feed
until ready for hibernation, finding in this grass, moreover, good shelter
for the winter.
The general statements here given apply to the average Chinch Bug
year in Illinois, Missouri, and the surrounding States, as the articles
from which we have drawn our main facts are the results of observa-
tions made in these States. The life-history and habits of the species
undoubtedly differ considerably in the more southern States, where,
however, it seldom does much damage. It is very doubtful, however,
that the habits differ so greatly as to admit of the correctness of the
statement quoted by Fitch from the Southern Planter (XV, 269), that
the eggs are laid in the ground in autumn where they remain through
the winter and until the warmth of the ground the following year
causes them to hatch! This great error (at least for the West and
North) is unfortunately perpetuated by Dr. Lintner in his second re-
port as State entomologist of New York, p. 153. There seems, in fact,
every reason to suppose that this was simply a guess on the part of the
editor of the Southern Planter without the slightest observation to
substantiate it. At our request, Professor Atkinson examined a num-
ber of females found near Chapel Hill, N. C., in November, but found
no evidence of mature eggs. He also searched carefully for deposited
eggs with, of course, negative results. He states that Mr. Thomas S.
Weaver, of Chapel Hill, has observed the bugs for the past ten years
and states that they never oviposit in autumn.
In exceptional seasons and under exceptional conditions the life-his-
tory and habits will vary considerably even in the localities referred to;
for example, in 1882, according to Professor Forbes’s first Illinois report,
there was evidently in some parts of the State but one brood,and the
first young bugs were not seen before July 10. The eggs of the first
brood were in some localities this season laid upon corn.
NATURAL ENEMIES AND DISEASES.
INSECT ENEMIES.—No true internal insect parasites of the Chinch Bug
have yet been found. In fact very few of these smaller Heteroptera are
parasitized except in the egg state. The minute Proctotrupide belong-
ing to Teleas and Telenomus infest the eggs of allied species and may
ultimately be found to attack the eggs of the Chinch Bug. Outside of
these genera, however, we can hardly expect any aid from parasitic in-
sects. In this connection, although it does not strictly come under this
head, we may mention that in 1885 Mr. Webster found a species of Mer-
mis (‘‘hair-snakes”) among the dried moltings and dead bodies of certain
Chinch Bugs in a stalk of Setaria, which gives rise to a strong proba-
bility that one of these creatures will be found to infest the bug. Many
predaceous insects destroy them, although their disgusting odor is prob-
ably more or less a protection.
22 THE CHINCH BUG.
Mr. Walsh in 1861 mentioned four Ladybirds, viz, the Spotted Ladybird
(Hippodamia maculata, Fig. 4), the Trim Ladybird (Coccinella munda,
now called Cycloneda sanguinea, Fig. 5), and two species of Scymnus. In
[Fig. 5.]
SPOTTED LADYBIRD. Trim LADYBIRD.
1882 Prof. Forbes found five species of Ladybirds (including the first
two mentioned by Walsh) extremely abundant on corn (15 or 20 to a
hill) which was infested by hosts of Chinch Bugs. .The contents of the
stomachs of a few specimens of each were examined with the following
results: In three specimens of Hippodamia maculata no traces of Chinch
Bugs were found, the food consisting of the spores of lichens, the pollen
of Rag-weed, and traces of Plant-lice. One-third of the food of Hippo-
damia convergens (5 specimens examined) consisted of equal parts of
Chinch Bugs and Plant-lice. In 4 specimens of Hippodamia glacialis 8
per cent. of the food was found to be Chinch Bugs, 18 per cent. Plant-
lice, and the rest vegetation.
44 THE CHINCH BUG.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL LIST.
[This is simply a list of the more importaut of the Chinch-bug articles. No men-
tion is made of a very large number which we have seen, but which contain nothing
new or original. Every progressive step of knowledge is mentioned in some one of
the articles here mentioned. ]
1831. Say, Tuomas. Lygaus leucopterus. Descriptions of new species of Heterop-
terous Hemiptera of North America, New Harmony, Ind., Dec. 183i. Com-
plete writings. Ed. by LeConte, Vol. I, p. 329.
(Original description ; described from a single specimen taken in Virginia.)
1845. PRAIRIE FARMER, V., 227.
(Injuries in Hancock County, Illinois.)
PRAIRIE FARMER, V., 287. Chinch Bugs.
(Injuries in Tazewell County, Illinois. An account of their season’s history.)
1846. PRAIRIE FarMER, VI., 134. The Chinch Bug.
(Injuries in Sangamon County, Lllinois.)
PRAIRIE FARMER, VI., 245. Chinch Bugs.
(Injuries in Cass County, Illinois.)
1850. Le Baron, WM. Rhyparochromus devastator. Prairie Farmer, Vol. X, p. 200.
(Described imago, and proposes specific name devastator; mentions that eggs are de-
posited on roots; points out its destructive characters as an insect enemy.)
1851: PRAIRIE FARMER, XI., 335. The Chinch Bug.
(Distribution within the State of Illinois.)
1852. Harris, T. W. Rhyparochromus leucopterus. Treatise on insects of Massa-
chusetts.
(Describes briefly imago; speaks of distribution and injuries. Recoras finding in his
garden in 1852.)
1855. Fircu, Asa. Micropus leucopterus. The Cultivator, 3d series, III, 237-239.
(Correspondent writes from Indiana. Fitch gives account of habits and injuries, past
history, and nomenclature. )
1856. Fircu, Asa. Micropus leucopterus. Second Rep. Ins. N. Y., pp. 227-297, Piate
IV, figs. 2 and 28,
(Gives 1783 as date when first known as insect depredator on wheat in North Carolina.
Notes its occurrence at several times during next fifty years in such numbers as to
nearly destroy the wheat crop. Farmers ceased to plant wheat for a couple of years
as only knownremedy. Alludes todrought which prevailed during period of injury,
and their destruction by wet weather, 1840. First attracted attention in Western
States, 1840-’44. Describes young larve. Mentions briefly a namber of varieties.
Gives history of nomenclature. Suggests spraying infested fields with water asa
practical remedy.)
1857. SIGNORET, V. Micropus leucopterus Say. Essai monographique du Genre Micro-
pus, Spinola, Ann. Soc. Ent. de France, V, 3d series, p. 31.
(A technical description from specimens received from New York and Cuba.)
1861. WALSH, B. D. Chinch Bug. Insects injurious to Vegetation in Illinois,
Trans. Il). State Agr. Soc., Vol. 4, 1859-60, pp. 346-349.
(First notice of four Ladybird enemies of the Chinch Bug. Figures Hipp. maculata, and
Coccinella munda.)
1862. Harris, T. W. Rhyparochromus leucopterus. Insects injurious to Vegetation,
3d ed., pp. 197-200, fig. 84. (See under 1852.)
1865. Ritey, C. V. The Chinch Bug. Prairie Farmer, September 19, 1865.
(Exposes the fallacy of a reported observation by Mr. D. H. Sherman in the Waukegan
Gazette, to the effect that the eggs are laid upon the wheat-head.)
1866.
1866.
1866.
1866,
1867.
1869.
1869.
1870.
1871.
1872.
1872.
1872.
1872.
THE CHINCH BUG. 45
WatsH, B.D. Chinch Bugs. Practical Entomologist, Vol. I, p. 95.
(Prints a clipping from Prairie Farmer, stating that the ‘‘bugs” had been successfully
fenced out of a field by putting boards on edge around it and coating eee edge.
with coal-tar.)
WatsH, B. D. Micropus (Lygeus) leucopterus. Pract. Ent., Vol. II, p. 21.
(Notices specimens of short-winged variety from Canada.)
Ritey, C.V. Chinch Bug. Pract. Ent., Vol. I, No. 6, p. 47.
(Exposes fallacy of a current theory that the eggs are deposited on the grain, and fields
become infested from its use. Gives methods of depositing eggs and states that
there are two generations in northern Illinois, and possibly three in more southern
latitudes.)
Ritey, C.V. The Chinch Bug. Prairie Farmer, Mar. 3, 1866.
(Devoted principally to remedies, recommending ditching, winter work, mixing rye or
tame grass with spring wheat.)
SHIMER, HENRY. Micropus (Lygeus) leucopterus. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
Vol. XIX, pp. 75-80.
(Full journal account of observations during 1864~’65 in Illinois. Conclusions as to
causes of their destruction in 1865.) Page 234. (Reference to epidemic.)
WatsH & RILEY. Micropus leucopterus. Am. Ent., Vol. I, pp. 169-177, fig. 122.
(Popular inferences, past history, natural history, checks to multiplication; review of
Dr. Shimer’s prophecies about appearance.)
IBID., pp. 194-199, figs. 138, 139.
(Predaceous foes of, damage done by, remedies for; summary of conclusions : (1) they
hibernate in imago stage in rubbish, which should be burned; (2) early sowing in
spring is an advantage; (3) compacting the soilacts as preventive; (4) heavy rains al-
Ways injure or entirely destroy them.)
PACKARD, A.S., Jr. Blissus leucopterus. Guideto the Study of Insects, pp. 543,
544, fig. 547.
(Describes imago, life history, injuries of; epidemic diseases of 1865. Cites its occur-
rence in Maine and at summit of Mount Washington. Notices the theory that wet
weather during breeding season is destructive to them.)
RILey, C. V. Micropus leucopterus. 2d Rep. State Ent. Mo., pp. 15-37, figs. 1
and 2.
(An extended account and the best yet published ; discusses past history, natural history,
destructive powers, heavy rains, natural enemies, amount of damage, remedies, and
bogus Chinch Bugs.)
GLOVER, TOWNEND. LRhyparochromus (Micropus) leucopterus. Rep. Com. Agr.,
1870, p. 89. ‘
(Refers to observations of others as to deposition of eggs, etc.)
BETHUNE, C. J. 8S. Micropus leucopterus. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ont., 1871, p. 55.
(Refers to accounts of early history, habits, enemies of, natural remedies, etc.)
LE Baron, WILLIAM. Micropus leucopterus. 2d Rep. St. Ent. IIl.,1871, pp.
142-156.
(Estimates loss from depredations current year in Illinois ten and one-half millions dol-
lars; treats of their prevention and destruction under five heads: (1) natural enemies,
(2) early sowing, (3) preventing migrations, (4) destroying Pe burning rubbish, (5)
cease cultivating the affected crops.)
GLOVER, TOWXEND. Rhyparochromus leucopterus. Rep. Com. Agr., 1871, p. 84.
(Merely refers to its injuries in Western States and mentions salt being used as a
remedy.)
Lr BARON, WILLIAM. Chinch Bug. Experience of 1372. Prairie Farmer,
August 24.
(Believes that a sufficient number of these insects hibernate under dead leaves in the
woods to perpetuate the species; also that the wet spring of 1872 destroyed large
numbers of the Chinch Bugs.)
46 THE CHINCH BUG.
1874. GLOVER, TOWNEND. Micropus (Rhyparochromus) leucopterus. Rep. U. S. Com.
Agr. 1872, p. 121.
(Mentions injuries in Western States to Corn, Wheat, Sorghum, ete.; three broods re-
ported observed in Missouri.)
1874. JoHNSON, B. F. Chinch Bug. Country Gent., Vol. XXXIX, p. 661.
(Abundant in central Illinois. Stock was poisoned by eating fodder. Suggests sow-
ing plats of noxious plants, Tobacco, Night-shade, Henbane, Stramonium, Hemp-
etc., to assist in checking their ravages.)
1875. GLOVER, TOWNEND. Micropus (Rhyparochromus) leucopterus. Rep. Com. Agr.,
1874, pp. 127, 128.
(Gives localities in Southern and Western States where reported as injurions.)
1875. Ritey, C. VY. Micropus leucopterus. 7th Rep. State Ent. Mo., pp. 19-50; appen-
dix, pp. 51-71, figs. 2, 3, and 4.
(Résumé of previous history, full descriptions of various stages, natural history, extended
account of injuries in 1874, exhaustive discussion of preventive measures and reme-
dies, mentions irrigation, predaceous enemies. Appendix, correspondence of farm-
ers relating to 1874 damage.)
1875, RitEy, C. V. Locusts vs. Chinch Bugs. N.Y. Weekly Tribune, August 4, 1875.
(A letter from Lyons, France, remarking upon the abundance of Chinch Bugs and allay-
ing fears as to great destruction by them.)
1876. UHLER, P. R. Blissus leucopterus. List of Hemiptera of the region west of the
Mississippi River, including those collected during the Hayden explorations
of 1873. Bulletin U.S. Geol. and Geog. Sur. Terr., I, second series, No. 2, p. 306.
(Mere mention, with a list of localities.) f
1877, PACKARD, A.S., Jr. Blissus leucopterus. 9th Rep. Geol. and Geog. Sur. Terr.,
1875, pp. 697-699, fig. 4 and map.
(Refers to its destructiveness in the Western States, quotes estimates of different State
Entomologists, notices briefly some of the remedies.)
1878. THOMAS, Cyrus. Blissus leucopterus. 7th Rep. State Ent. Iil., pp. 40-71, 2 figs.
(Résumé of history, natural history, descriptions, etc. Two brooded in northern Illinois,
possibly three in southern Illinois. Remedies and general discussion of same).
1879. RitEy, C. V. Entomological Notes. The Chinch Bug. Farmers’ Review
(Chicago), February, 1879.
(Discusses weather influence and advances parallel between Rocky Mountain Locust and
Chinch Bug. Review of life history and summary of facts from Seventh Rept. Ins.
Mo. Prediction of bugs in 1879 if weather prove dry.)
1879. THOMAS, Cyrus. Blissus leucopterus. Bull. U.S. Ent.Com.No.5. Ten figures,
map showing distribution.
(Exhaustive résumé of present knowledge with facts concerning injuries, natural his-
tory, predaceous enemies, full discussion of preventive and remedial measures.)
1880. Kansas STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Quarterly Report for the quarter
ending June 30, 1820, Topeka, July 20, p. 61.
(An account of damage to Sorghum.)
1880. THomas, Cyrus. Temperature and Rainfall as affecting the Chinch Bug.
Am. Ert. New series. Vol. I, pp. 240-242, with diagram.
(Condensation of his theory about periodicity of seasons of drought and their relation to
appearance of this insect.)
1881. THomas, Cyrus. The Relation of Meteorological Conditions to Insect De-
velopment. 10th Rep. State Ent. Ill., pp. 47-59, with diagram.
(Discusses theory of Septennary Cycles of Meteorological conditions; believes it possi-
ble to predict with considerable certainty the season when Chinch Bugs will appear
in injurious numbers.)
1881. RiLEy, C. V. Am. Nat., October, p. 820.
(Calls attention to the verification of Prof. Cyrus Thomas's prediction that this would be
a bad Chinch-Bug year. )
1881.
1882.
1882.
1882.
1882.
1882.
1883.
1883.
- 1883.
1883.
1883.
1883.
1884.
1884.
1885.
1885.
1885.
1885.
THE CHINCH BUG. 47
Ritgy,C. V. Am. Agriculturist, Nov. and Dec., 1881.
(Reviews natural history and remedies, and discusses the practicability of irrigation as a
remedy.)
Howarp, L. O. Rep. U.S. Dept. Agr., 1881-82, p. 137.
(Mentions it as infesting Rice affected by ‘‘ white blast.’’)
Ritey, C. V. Chinch Bug Notes. Rept. Ent., Ann. Rept. U.S. Dept. Agr.,
1881-82, pp. 87-89.
(Calls attention to Professor Thomas’s prediction of injury during 1881 and the fact that
it was partially fulfilled ; discusses briefly remedies and methods of prevention.)
Forsss, 8. A. Bacterium. A parasite of the Chinch Bug. Am. Nat. Vol. XVI,
p. 824.
(Account of discovery of parasitic disease among Chinch Bugs.)
ForseEs, 8. A. Blissus leucopterus. 12th Rep. State Ent. I1l., pp. 32-63, fig. 6.
(Gives full account of observations on life history, etc., for the year, insect enemies,
a new insect enemy, bird enemies, account of observation on a bacterium para-
site. Experiments in drenching with water under artificial conditions (not fully
carried out), report of experiments with topical applications.)
Ritey, C. V. The Chinch Bug. Am. Agriculturist, p. 476, 3 figs.
(General account of, habits and natural history, meteorological conditions affecting.)
LINTNER, J. A. Cir. No. 1, N. Y. St. Mus. Nat. Hist.
(Directions for arresting Chinch Bug invasion of northern New York.)
LINTNER, J. A. The Chinch Bug in New York. Country Gent., Nov. 8, 1883.
(Directions for co-operation among farmers to prevent ravages coming year.)
Forses, 8. A. Experiments on Chinch Bug. U.S. Dept. Agr., Div. Ent., Bull.
IN‘on 2:
Memoranda of experiments with kerosene emulsion and mixtures, made at the sugges-
tion of Professor Riley ; found them quite effective.
ForBEs, 8. A. Entomological Notes of the Season. State Dept. Agr., Cir. 106,
Ill., crops for 1883, p. 177.
(Notes the deposition of eggs for first brood on the roots of Indian Corn.)
SAUNDERS, WM. Micropus leucopterus. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ont., pp. 59-62.
(Account of appearance in New York; quotes from Lintner.)
RILEY, C. V. Chinch Bug in New York. Science, Vol. II, 1883, p. 621.
(Cites facts to show that their appearance in New York is not an invasion, but extraor-
dinary development of the species, dependent upon climatic conditions. j
RiveEy, C. V. The Chinch Bugin New York State. American Naturalist, Jan.,
1884, Vol. XVIII, p. 79-80.
(A reprint of an unplaced article in Scientific American criticising Dr. Lintner’s conclu-
sions as to reasons for alarm in northern New York.)
LINTNER, J. A. 37th Ann. Rep. N. Y. St. Mus. Nat. Hist., pp. 53-60.
(Not seen.)
BRUNER, LAWRENCE. Blissus leucopterus. Rept. Ent., Ann. Rept. Dept. Agr.,
1884, p. 399.
(Cites an instance where large numbers disappeared immediately after a heavy rain.)
Ritey, C. V. Chinch Bug Notes. Rept. Ent., Ann. Rept. Dept. Agr., 1884,
pp. 405-405.
(Refers to occurrence in New York and considers that there is no cause for alarma; pre-
dicts they will attract no further notice.)
ForsBes, 8. A. Ent. Calendar. 14th Rep. St. Ent., Ill., pp. 4-5.
(Notes on life history for year 1884.)
LINTNER, J. A. Blissus leucopterus. 2nd Rept. State Ent., N. Y., pp. 148-164;
figs. 37-38, 39 and 40.
(Account of its occurrence in northern New York, résumé of its history, life history,
remedial measures employed and recommended.)
48 THE CHINCH BUG.
1886. Hunt, THomas F. Blissus leucopterus. Bibliography of insects injurious to
corn. Misc. Essays on Economic Ent., Ill. St. Bd. Agr., 1885.
1886. WrBSTER, F. M. Blissus leucopterus. Insects affecting Fall Wheat. Rept. of
Ent., Ann. Rept. Dept. Agr. 1885, p. 318.
(A brief record of Chinch Bug observations during the season. Records Mermis as
a possible parasite. )
1886. Forses, 8. A. Chinch Bug in Illinois. Circular of information from the
office of State Entomologist.
1887. BRUNER, LAWRENCE. Notes of the season. Bull. No. 13, Div. Ent., U.S. Dept.
Agr., pp. 34, 35.
(Brief notices of their appearance in Western States in 1886.)
1887. ForBEs, 8. A. The present condition and prospects of the Chinch Bug in I}li-
nois for 1887-88. Bull. No.2 of the State Entomologist.
(Speaks of ravages for three years past, life history, food- piu preventive remedial
measures exhaustively discussed.)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BuLLETIN No. 18.
THE LIFE
HNTOMOLOGICAL WORK
OF THE LATE
TOWNEND GLOVER,
FIRST ENTOMOLOGIST OF THE U. 8. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
PREPARED, UNDER DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST,
BY
CHARLES RICHARDS DODGE.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1888.
Wes DEPARTMENT -OF AGRICULTURE:
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 18.
PELE, sea BE
AND
HNTOMOLOGICAL WORK
OF THE LATE
poe INGE) Gl) VER,
FIRST ENTOMOLOGIST OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
PREPARED, UNDER DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST,
BY
CHARLES RICHARDS DODGE.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1888.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., December 5, 1887.
Sir: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 18 of
this division, being an account of the life and work of the late Townend
Glover, my predecessor as United States Entomologist, prepared by
Charles Richards Dodge. I had for some time thought of preparing a
full bibliographical list of Glover’s writings with a general index
thereto, because of the usefulness of such a publication in the work of
the Division. Such a compilation would naturally lead to some brief
statement of Mr. Glover’s character, and especially of his official life,
and I would here acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. Glover’s widow
and to his cousins in London for their kindness in furnishing informa-
tion. Mr. Dodge has fortunately been willing to relieve me of a task
which he is far more able to accomplish, not only because of the data
he has collected, but by virtue of his long and intimate relations, both
private and official, with Mr. Glover, who could certainly have had no
more appreciative biographer. 1 trust that the bulletin may prove ae-
ceptable and useful to all interested in economic entomology.
Respectfully,
C. V. RILEY,
Entomologist.
Hon. NoRMAN J. COLMAN,
Commissioner of Agriculture.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
Boston, MAss., December 1, 1887.
DEAR Sie: In undertaking to tell the story of Mr. Glover’s life, I feel
that, while it is a pleasant privilege to be able to review such interest-
ing reminiscences of our long acquaintance as may bear upon the man
and his work, the account must be necessarily imperfect and incomplete
in portions from lack of important data.
The facts regarding his boyhood life are gleaned from your visits to,
and correspondence with, Mr. C.G. Oates and Mr. Abram Clapham, of
London, England—Mr. Oates’s mother and Mr. Clapham being Mr.
Glover’s first cousins, the nearest English relatives who were living at
the time,—and also from early personal diaries and family papers;
loaned me by Mrs. Hopper.
Mrs. Glover has rendered me valuable aid by furnishing important in-
formation regarding dates, and by placing at my disposal a considerable
amount of documentary evidence relating to the middle period of his
life, which, with a few early letters and my own recollection of the man,
and of many conversations with him touching upon his personal history,
are the principal materials that have been available. I am also in-
debted to you for portions of the bibliography of his entomological
writings, prepared by Mr. B. P. Mann, and for your kind assistance in
other directions.
As the subject of this sketch was a man of great individuality, I have
thought it best to present the main facts ot his life in such manner as
will more fully bring out his personal attributes and peculiarities, and
leave the treatment of his entomological and museum work, or that
which bears directly on his connection with the Department of Agri-
culture, to special chapters. Some of the extracts or incidents may
seem trivial, but the make-up of the man embodies such diversity of
talent, and at the same time presents such originality, that it has seemed
best to use that material which will best show him forth as he was.
[ am yours, respectfully,
CHARLES RICHARDS DODGE.
Prof. CHARLES V. RILEY,
Entomologist, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
or
THE LIFE OF TOWNEND GLOVER.
Prof. Townend Glover, the first entomologist of the United States
Department of Agriculture, was born at Rio de Janeiro, February 20,
1813. His paternal grandfather was Mr. Samuel Glover, a merchant of
Leeds, England. His father, Mr. Henry Glover, an oniy son (though
there were several daughtefs) married Miss Mary Townend, of Leaming
Lane, Yorkshire, and was engaged in commercial pursuits at Rio de Ja-
neiro when Townend Glover wasborn. His mother dying, afterafew days
illness, when he was about six weeks old, he was sent to his relatives in
England; and, upon the death of his father, which occurred some six
years later, he was taken in charge of by his paternal grandmother
and maiden aunt in Leeds. Here his education began, as he was placed
in a private school of high reputation, of which the Rev. Mr. Holmes was
preceptor.
By nature the boy Townend was of a reserved disposition, making
few close friendships outside the immediate circle of his own family.
He was, nevertheless, abounding in high animal spirits, possessed of a
strong sense of fun and humor, which always made him an agreeable and
entertaining companion to those with whom he was wont to associate.
In his studies at school he showed a fair degree of aptness, and being
endowed with good abilities he is said to have acquitted himself with
unfailing credit, and without any special effort on his part.
Kven in boyhood his love for drawing showed itself, chiefly in cari-
eature of the people about him, admirably done at that early period, it
is said, his efforts sometimes bringing the youthful artist into trouble.
The beginning of his love for entomology dates back to these early
school-boy days, at which time, in company with the one congenial and
intimate friend of his boyhood, a lad with similar tastes, he was already
interested in making a collection of insects, which, it is said, he prepared
and mounted with skill. As a boy he was very clever with his hands
in anything requiring care and nicety, and was singularly quick and apt.
And not only was he drawn towards the insect world, but natural history
in all its branches, and even botany, had an early and peculiar fascina-
tion for him. Upon leaving school, we are told that young Glover was
prevailed upon by his friends to enter the warehouse of a firm of Leeds
merchants, with a view to acquiring a knowledge of the woolen goods
~
d
8
trade. Mr. Glover alludes to this in his diary (March 16, 1834) in char-
acteristic language, as follows:
Mr. C. this evening gave me my indentures of apprenticesbip to Thompson, Scarf
& Co., by which I find that £300 of my money is gone forever, merely to learn the
‘‘art and mystery” of a stuff merchant, a mystery I hope never to practice.
What other plans for his future may have been made for him, or were
entertained by himself at that time, are not known, though his aunt was
once very desirious that he should study for the ministry. In after-life
he frequently referred to this with satirical allusions to having beeu cut
out for the clergy ; and in a letter written to friends in England many
years after coming to America it is amusing to find a joking reference to
his clerical education. In his commercial life, with its exacting routine,
though utterly at variance with every instinct of his nature, he fulfilled
the duties which the position-entailed upon him conscientiously aad
with assiduity as long as he continued in ite The early discipline did
him no harm, if, indeed, it did not fit him for the life of most exacting
routine of his later years, to which, though self-imposed, he gave the
best years of his existence.
But there suddenly came an end to his commercial education, for at
the age of twenty-one, or as soon as he had reached his majority, he
shook himself free at once and forever from the trammels of business
life. .
His father had bequeathed him an ample fortune, but, as Mr. Glover
once gave the story to the writer, through the perfidy of his father’s
partners in business, or others associated with him in Rio, the fortune
had been dissipated, save a portion which, unknown to Mr. Glover,
until he had reached his majority, was reserved in trust by relatives
in England. Mr. Glover not only thought that he had been cheated
out of his patrimony, but on at least one occasion has intimated the
suspicion that his father’s death had occurred from other than natural
causes. Some weeks after arriving at his majority he received the small
fortune held for him by relatives in Leeds, and having meantime fitted
himself for going abroad by the study of German, he began active
preparations for his journey. To one who has known Mr. Glover inti-
mately in later life his diary kept at this period is most interesting, as
showing, even at the age of twenty-one, so many of those traits of char-
acter or individualisms, if the term may be used, which so strongly
marked the mature man. Indifference to country or home, distrust of
mankind and of the motives of people about him, self-reliance and a
wish to be his own master, and at the same time frequent evidences
of the good influences by which he had been surrounded in the family
circle in which he was reared, appear on many pages. Some are so
striking I can not forbear making a few brief extracts.
During a short visit to Burneston, in April, 1834, he wrote :
Sauntered about all day, reading Tam O’Shanter; begin to think a country life
would be very tiresome. Could manage to spend some months very pleasantly in the
9
country, provided I had books, paint box, horse, gun, flute, etc., not forgetting a
pleasant friend, without which a man might be tempted to shoot or drown himself
for very ennui.
The entry tor the next day is confined to three short lines:
‘What with teasing the servant about her lover, plaguing the cat, and gossiping
with the villagers, managed with difficulty to live the day out.
Evidence of a restless nature, abhorring idleness.
Having decided to indulge his taste for artist life and at the same
time see something of the world, on the 19th of April, 1834, he quitted
Leeds and started for Munich, with a view of putting himself upon a
systematic course of study in different branches of painting. Regard-
ing his leave-taking he says:
Miss G. [his aunt] cried most prodigiously, as if I should never return homne—home
did I say? I forgot that I have no home and that for the future I must consider the
world as my home, or, rather, make a home wherever Iam. _ I leave some few people
in Leeds whom I shall regret to lose, but on the whole I like my prospects very much.
He spent nearly a month en route to Munich, stopping at Hamburg,
Hanover, Gotha, and many other places, and arriving on the 14th of
May. Here he began study at once, though at first he confined himself
to the study of the German language under one Dr. Caflish, and it was
not until a month later that he had made arrangements with the artist
Mattenheimer, “the inspector ot the gallery,” to give him lessons in
ruit and flower painting in oil.
Under date of June 19, 1834, he writes:
Took my first lesson in flower drawing and like it very much; he (Mattenheimer)
says he sees that I have talent, from my drawings, and that in a little time I shall
paint very well—flattery to make me learn—buit don’t care; if it pleases me I intend
to continue it till I paint tolerably.
A week later, this:
For the first time handled palette and brushes and daubed a little in oil painting.
Mightily pleased to have advanced so far; don’tintend to say anything about it to my
friends in Leeds, or they will expect miracles of me.
A few days after this his master has been trying to persuade him to
be an artist. ‘ Will not, though, whatever he says,” closes the entry.
Regarding his art work at this time it has been said of him that still-
life and natural history subjects were his special delight, whether he
painted in water colors or oils; and so successful was he in what he under-
took in this way that with some who were well acquainted with his
work, it was a source of regret that he did not make painting the seri-
ous study of his life. Notwithstanding this statement, it is not likely
that Mr. Glover would ever have madea great artist in the sense of pro-
ducing strong, original pictures. From a study of examples of bis best
efforts produced both in Europe and in America (oils and water colors),
it is very evident that he was strongest in the direction of illustrative
work, or close studies, where great detail and accuracy of delineation
were absolutely essential. He was at his best in still-life, therefore, and
especially in the painting of fruits, flowers, and the lesser animal life.
10
A number of his works in oil, which he brought to Washington, were
only copies from the productions of his masters or other p.inters, and
should not be taken as standards of his ability.
His water color paintings of flowers and insects and a few natural
history objects, are most exquisite examples of artistic illustration, and
are drawn to the life, showing the expenditure ofa vast amount of labor
and patience, and giving assurance in the artist of a fair eye for color.
As arule they are painted with little attention to modeling, the color
being laid on heavily, stippled and frequently lacking in transpareucy,
and without attempt at composition in the sense of making pictures of
them. But they are very realistic and sometimes quite decorative.
Many of his early drawings of the Florida insects are as exquisitely fin-
ished, though with his later originals he took less pains. When Mar-
garet Fuller first saw some of the flower paintings she would hardly be-
lieve that they had not been done under the microscope, so delicate was
the work. Whether or not his extreme shortsightedness made it diffi-
cult for him to paint in any other manner, it is impossible to say, how-
ever well adapted to the labors of bis after life this special kind of work
may have been. He could not have painted broadly had he desired to
do so, for his almost microscopic vision saw everything in the minutest
detail. This explains, too, why his after engravings of insects, par.
ticularly of larvae, lack in action.
After finishing his journeyings in Europe and having turned his back
upon Munich, the study of art was still an absorbing interest with him.
On his return to England he took up his abode at Leeds for a short time,
and, in a room set apart for the purpose of a studio, and surrounded by
pets of every conceivable description, he continued to paint with assi-
duity. And it is pleasant to learn that his love of natural history shared
equally with his love ofart. Many delightful reminiscences of the young
painter-naturalist (who was now about twenty-three years old), are re-
called by those who knew him at this time, all indicating the manner of
life which he afterwards followed. Mr. Oates thus writes of him in a
memorial sent to Professor Riley :
He would sit before his easel with a favorite lizard nestled in his breast, his coat
pockets tenanted by snakes, and a blackbird perched upon his shoulder, whilst hang-
ing on the walls of his apartment might be seen some tiny gauze cages, daintily con-
structed for the reception of tame spiders, which were periodically supplied with flies.
There were also in the room a variety of other birds and such quadrupeds as mice,
rats, and guineapigs, all pets in a greater or less degree. Glover’s early school friend,
previously referred to, still living at Whitby in Yorkshire, particularly recollects vis-
iting him in this apartment on one occasion when he was painting a bunch of grapes,
his blackbird as usual upon his shoulder. Glover had just completed the painting of
the grapes, when the fancy seized him to add a fly, as though it had alighted on the
fruit. This he did, and had scarcely withdrawn his hand from the work, when the
blackbird darted from its master’s shoulder and pecked lustily at the phantom fly.
About this time Glover had begun to give some attention to copper-plate engraving,
and also carved in wood. He sustained a great sorrow in the death of a littie girl, the
child of a first cousin, who was devotedly attached to him and for whose amusement he
11
never wearied of exerting himself, for his affections once roused were acutely sensi-
tive and tender. Glover was possessed of great physical activity, and though not
skilled in horsemanship was fond of riding. On one occasion, it is stated, that whilst
riding on a friend’s horse, which proved restive, he was thrown violently to the pave-
ment, and his head striking the curbstone, he sustained a fracture of the skull. For
some time his life remained in jeopardy, and though to all appearance he ultimately
recovered from the effects of the accident, it has been suggested that the injury then
received told on him in later years and led to the somewhat premature failure of his
powers.
Professor Glover has more than once stated to the writer that the
scar upon the side of his head was made by the bursting of a gun bar-
rel and Mrs. Glover verifies the statement. It occurred, too, before he
went to Munich, for there is a reference to his fractured skull in his
journal. However the injury was inflicted, I can not think the sug-
gestion made above has any weight, as Mr. Glover’s peculiar and ir-
regular mode of life in after afters, without recreation, and his pro-
longe d ill-health for several years in a trying southern climate, were
sufficient causes for his breaking down before reaching three score and
ten.
Whether or no Mr. Glover returned to Munich again can not be stated
from any written records. During a few weeks of his first summer in
Germany (1834), he made an extended pedestrian tour through the
Tyrol with his German teacher by way of vacation and to learn the
language. Some of his pencil sketches made in Tyrol are dated 1836,
but as he-sailed for America June 24 of that year, he could only
have made a flying visit to Germany, if at all. He decided to visit
the United States through the representations of some relatives, young
men who settled in America about this timé, though he did not at
first entertain the idea of making it a permanent abiding place. His
roving disposition prompting a period of adventure and sight-seeing
before settling anywhere, he at first spent his time in travel.
This was a turning pointinhis life. The fine, open scenery, the lakes
and vast rivers of the United States appeared to exercise a powerful
influence on his impressionable nature and led to his making it his home.
For several years after coming to the New World he roamed at leisure
through different parts of the country, and particularly in the South,
making New Rochelle his headquarters, for there are records of his
having remained in New Rochelle, near New York, at various times
during the years 1836 to 1839. He was in New Rochelle August, 1836,
and in that month started on a journey through New York State, thence
West and South, the close of the year finding him in Louisiana and
Texas. In 1837 he was again traveling about through the picturesque
portions of New York State, and early in 1838 was once more South,
visiting the Carolinas, Georgia, and adjacent States.
Mis. Glover tells me that he finally settled in New Rochelle in: the
spring of 1838, and here his dog and gun, or rod and boat, were almost
constant companions; his boat, which be built and was very much
12
attached to, demanding the greater part of his time. When it was
launched there were some lines written commencing :
To Townend we drink, that lad of much fun,
So deeply in love with his dog and his gun.
A volume might be filled with the stories Mr. Glover has told me of
his life at this period. He was ‘hail fellow, well met,” everywhere,
having all the friends he desired (sometimes too many, doubtless), and
devoting himself to pleasure.
It was during a brief visit to Fishkill that Mr. Glover first met Miss
Sarah T. Byrnes, an estimable young lady, and the daughter of Joseph
T. Byrnes, a gentleman of prominence, who owned a large estate lying
upon the banks of the Hudson. An attachment having sprung up be-
tween them, they were married in September, 1840, in New Rochelle,
and in the following spring went to live in Fishkill-on-the-Hudson (then
known as Fishkill Landing), Mrs. Glover’s native place.
During the five years which followed Mr. Glover chiefly interested
himself in floriculture, in natural history studies, and taxidermy, a large
case of the native birds of Dutchess County, N. Y., shot and prepared
by him, still remaining in excellent condition, evidence of his taste and
skill in this direction. He also employed a part of his time in art, as
Mrs. Glover particularly remembers two large oil paintings, one of fruit,
the other of flowers, which were produced at this time, and subse-
quently presented to relatives in England.
In the spring of 1846, in company with his wife, Mr. Glover visited
his relations in England, remaining until fall. Upon his return he went
to live upon his own place, which he had purchased from the Byrnes
estate, and a more romantic and beautiful spot he could hardly have
chosen. Lying upon the crest of a gentle slope, in sight of Storm King,
the surrounding country broken into majestic hills and deep vales, at
a point where the noble river makes a bend to the left and is joined by
the creek which swept at the foot of his garden, the view was one of
surpassing loveliness. I first saw it through the yellow haze of a bright
October day and while viewing scenes which had been sofamiliar to him—
the orchard that he had planted, the garden plot where he spent so
much of his time, and the rocky creek, upon the banks of which he had
had so many piscatorial triumphs, for he was an expert disciple of Wal-
ton—the wonder came how he could have left it all, and become satisfied
with the hum-drum life into which he drifted in later years. In this
beautiful place, on his return from England, he began in earnest the
life of a country gentleman, busying himself with the planting and care
of fruit and ornamental trees, and with his garden, which was noted for
its fine flowers and vegetables. He also paid considerable attention to
the cultivation of small fruits, all the leading varieties of which were
tested by him. ‘
Mr. Glover visited England again in the fall of 1849, and at this time
spent some days at Walton Hail, in Wakefield. Mr. Oates states that
while staying on one occasion with a cousin at Scarborough, with whom
13
he was on intimate terms, he chanced to meet Charles Waterton, who
was stoppiug at the same place, and the two cousins subsequently be.
came for a short time the guests of the veteran naturalist at Walton Hall.
Upon his visit in 1849, Waterton presented Glover with several of his
works, the ** Wanderings,” now in the possession of Mr. William H. Ed-
wards, containing the naturalist’s autograph.
During this period of Mr. Glover’s life, that is, the latter part of the
forties, he made the acquaintance of Mr. A. J. Downing, and through
the intimacy which followed he became deeply interested in pomology,
his enthusiasm prompting him to devote himself to it for a time. Then
came the desire to do something of practical and lasting value that might
be appreciated beyond the narrow limits of the little world in which he
moved. The scheme of illustrating American pomology by a series of
perfect fac-similes, with special regard to the changes produced by differ-
ences of soils and climates, was planned and entered upon. At first he
experimented to find the best composition of which to make his models,
and practiced with the laying on of color to get the most natural effects,
His first efforts are said to have been very crude, but he worked persist-
ently until success was attained, and then he began thecollection. Two
rooms were set apart for a workshop, materials purchased in quantity,
and the work was pushed as rapidly as possible during the fruit season,
and continued for several years.
The formation of this collection, without doubt, had more to do with
altering the course of his after life than has been supposed, for through
it the ten years of rural quiet at Fishkill were followed by a period of
roaming again. At various times between 1849 and 1852 his collection
of fruits were exhibited at State fairs and elsewhere, a number of cups
and medals having been given him as prizes. They were once or twice
exhibited in Albany, once in 1851 at the exhibition of the New York
State Agricultural Society, and subsequently at a meeting or exhibition
of the American Instite+s in New York, the collection at this time be-
ing quite large. Correspondence in my possession shows that in 1852
he arranged for an exhibition in Horticultural Hall, Boston, though I
do not know that the fruits were ever exhibited there, though they were
exhibited in several other places.
Mr. Glover had now made considerable reputation as a pomologist.
He was invited to act as ajudge at the New York State and other fairs,
and wrote for the American Agriculturist on pomological subjects. A
letter from the late Marshall P. Wilder, bearing date November 7, 1851,
makes mention of a ‘“‘ beautiful and correct cast of a Louise Bonne de
Jersey pear,” recently brought to his notice, the letter closing with an
offer to send him some specimens of new fruits.
The attention that these models had attracted and the commenda-
tions Mr. Glover had received for his collection led him, in the winter
of 1853-54, to take them to Washington for exhibition and possible
sale. This was about the time that the new Bureau of Agriculture was
established in the United States Patent Office, and Mr. Glover very
14
soon became connected with it. His commission bears date June 14,
1854, and his appointment was made “for collecting statistics and other
information on seeds, fruits, and insects in the United States.” A small
cabinet was at once begun in the single room then devoted to the Bureau
of Agriculture, the fruit models forming no small part of the exhibit.
The collection of fruit models now comprised some 2,000 specimens;
the matrices being also preserved and numbered, that duplicates might
be made if desired. “It has taken $3,000 in cash and six years of un-
remitting toil” to produce them, is Mr. Glover’s written testimony about
this time concerning the collection.
Mr. Glover’s name is not mentioned in any of the official reports of
the Commissioner of Patents. By inference, however, we know that he
held the dual position of entomologist and special agent, his duties
necessitating travel upon various missions bearing upon the agricult-
ural interests of the country, through the Southern States mainly, and
at one time into South America. Charles Mason was Commissioner of
Patents at this time, the chief clerk in charge of the Bureau being D.
J. Browne, of New Hampshire.
In 1854 Mr. Glover studied in the field the insects affecting various
crops, the summer months being spent in South Carolina investigating
the grape insects and the insects injurious to cotton. In 1855 he was
ordered to Florida, where he occupied himself during the entire season
of five or six months in studying the habits of various insects and in
investigations upon the insect enemies of cotton. In a private letter he
alludes to this summer having been spent most pleasantly ** with alli-
gators, mosquitoes, and red bugs.” It may be worthy of note that
nearly all the drawings which subsequently appeared in his twenty-two
plates of the cotton insects were made at this time in and about Tal.
lahassee, though his field of observation extended from Columbia, S. C.,
southward. It wasin this year, too, that he first met the one congenial
friend and companion of his Florida experiences, a worthy gentleman,
Mr. Henry Wells, the friendship lasting through life. Mr. Wells was
always dignified with the pseudonym ‘“ Alligator” to the last of their
acquaintance, Mr. Glover’s correspondent appellation being “ Old June
Bug.”
The experiences of this season also inspired the Florida litany, which
Mr. Glover was want to repeat upon occasions with great satisfaction.
He was frequently asked for copies of the lines, and he always returned
an emphatic ‘‘ no,” for he never would allow original verse of this de-
scription to get out of his possession, at least when he could help it.
Here is the litany as jotted down by me during a chance recital not
long after a refusal to make a copy of the lines:
From red-bugs and bed-bugs, from sand-flies and land-flies,
Mosquitoes, gallinippers, and fleas,
From hog-ticks and dog-ticks, from hen-lice and men-lice,
We pray thee, good Lord, give us ease:
And all the congregation shall scratch and say Amen.
ES
In the winter of 1856~57 he was ordered to British Guiana and Ven.
ezuela to take charge of an expedition having for its object the restock-
ing of the Louisiana sugar plantations, the native cane having deterio-
rated to a degree affecting the sugar interest. An appropriation of
$10,000 having been granted for the purpose, the bark Release, with
a competent crew, was placed at
the disposal of the Patent Office,
and Mr. Glover, as the Government
agent, placed in charge of the ex-
pedition. He was in every way
iy
INIWNUIADD
\) jy Wuanas
TMI)
¥vagct
LNIWLY V3
Toh
by
"NOILYAIDILNG
(\ 1B YOIY:
toy ro |
hpruay
Pouprnap pybupue yuvvep
Sica Be bu
“PRI %
PEN Fitery
SOY, Poroapy homo gm hR «@.
743 Io
NOILWNLIS INVSV3I1Z
I
aot eee ae
“WOlLIZASOULTY
: PY MMOS subvi0e7
eed
S
»
S
mh
~s]
=
Ss
=
N
a
=
aL
3
g
3
N
:
é
9
PD]
.
x
<
&
>
S07
N
S
iS
&
»
>
‘
&
SS
i
Si
x
Xo
90h Wong
Eren2: Fig. 1.
successful, bringing a large cargo of cane to New Orleans, though he
was attacked with fever very soon after, the result of his exposure in a
malarious country, and for a time was very ill. A couple of caricatures
of himself made at the time are interesting. (See Figs. 1 and 2.)
16
About the middle of August, 1857, he wasordered to Mississippi,
where the remainder of the season was spent in visiting cotton planta-
tions in different portions of the State. It was a hard season for him, as
he was sick during the greater portion of the time, often being con-
fined to his bed. An entry in his journal October 6 is characteris-
tic. ‘Quarrel between doctors, so I have to dismiss one, and the other
says it is no use to attend. Saved my life by it.”
It is worthy of mention that at this time his observations were not
confined to entomology alone, but to all branches of natural history.
Indeed, he let nothing new escape him in any field of experience, his
‘“mems.” indicating observations upon insects other than affecting cot-
ton, cotton diseases, soils and earths, vegetation, STS animals, reptiles,
fattian mounds, and even human nature.
The year 1858 marks the period of his investigations upon orange
insects, he having been ordered to Florida in the latter part of April,
where he remained throughout the season. It was an eventful year,
inasmuch as it was marked by events which later on led to his severing
his connection with the Patent Office, and beginning his work on ento-
mology.
He now had made the acquaintance of Baron Osten Sacken, Dr.
Morris, Mr. Ubler, and other of the earlier American entomological
authorities, and had become a member of the Washington Naturalists’
Club. In the records of his life at this period are frequent occurrences
of the names of Professors Henry, Baird, Girard, Drs. Hayden, Kenni-
cott, Clemens, Forman, Meek, Messrs. Ulke, Cooper, and others, with
allusions to prominent Senators and Congressmen of the day. It was
almost at the beginning of this year, too, that the first evidences of
friction between himself and his immediate superior officer became
apparent. He was working at this time upon the plates of his Cotton
-Insects and Diseases, besides engraving special plates for publication
in the annual volume, under the direction of his superior, D. J. Browne.
In January we find such brief entries as the following: “ Blow up
with B. about article on plows.”—“At work etching tea-plant.”—
“ Writing reply to weevil article.”—“ Row about sorghum.”
In February: “Heard at Browne’s about Kennicott wanting Fitch
here.”—“ Bothering about bees for Browne. Made sketch; not right.”—
‘‘ Etching and fussing about the bee plate for B., as he don’t know what
he wants.”—* Evening at B.’s; he will write all my reports himself, and
makes an ass of himself and a tool of me. Don’t and won’t acknowl-
edge it, as I have never written a word of what he says, and he has not
looked at my report yet.”
In Mareh: “ Evening at Girard’s, who advises me to stay, although
D. J. B. will make a false report of me.”—‘‘Another row with D. J. B.
He must be crazy.”
In April: ‘Browne at my room, evening, grumbling about Dr. Hig-
gins trying to supersede him; he has got an idea (Heaven knows why)
17
that Iam as great a naturalist as Audubon! That Audubon had Baech-
man to write his articles, and [ have (Lord save the mark !)” Browne!—
‘Still waiting orders. Smithsonian—no cans, no bottles, no tins, no
nothin’ ”.—“ Spoke to Shugart, who will see Commissioner about my
report.”—* Off to Florida,” ete.
Through May and June he was hard at work in the field observing,
sketching, and experimenting with solutions for the destruction of the
orange insects. An extract from an official letter to him, signed by his
superior officer and bearing date June 23, is interesting at this point.
After referring to what has been done and the difficulties in the way it
says: ‘ But a more effectual remedy would seem to consist in covering
the entire tree with some glutinous fluid, which would close up the aper-
tures of the shells and prevent escape of the perfect insects. Blood has
been suggested as being both feasible and economical, preserved by salt-
ing, and made sufficiently dilute with water to be readily applied with a
syringe. Near the regions where the orange tree flourishes in Florida
the alligator is found in great numbers. It is well known that this rep-
tile abounds in blood, which could readily be taken in the winter, when
it is in an inactive state. This blood could be preserved in casks, ete.
July 3, this entry: “ Killed alligator. After stabbing him in the
neck and dividing vertebre he still lived several hours. Not one pint
of blood in its whole carcass, and nearly 5 feet long—one quart to 10
feet ; 100 alligators to 25 gallons. Absurd!” As no after mention is
made of this proposed remedy, and there is no reference to it in Mr.
Glover’s published report, it doubtless did not amount to anything.
A year after, however, when Mr. Glover had left the office, a series
of articles against D. J. B. appeared in a Washington paper, signed
with a nom de plume, and among other things this matter was touched
upon. While Mr. Glover would never admit that he had written the
articles, he never denied their authorship. They bear his unmistakable
ear-marks, however, and were preserved by him with other personal
writings. Asan exampleof rich satire this one extract on the alligator
question is presented :
I have been credibly informed by a gentleman who has had some practical experi-
ence in combatting his (the alligator’s) obstinate disposition to shuffle off this mortal
coil, that. being an animal of warm and generous blood and of a highly excitable
temperament, he will yield the almost fabulous amount of one pint of the much-desired
crimson fluid. One of 10 feet then will give 2 pints, and 100 of that length somewhero
in the neighborhood of 20 gallons. Two hundred negroes might possibly capture 100
alligators in a day, one being necessary to hold the head and another the tail, whilst
the surgical operator undertakes the pleasing task of relieving him of his claret.
Supposing, then, each negro to measure only 5 feet in height, the account would stand
as follows: 1,000 feet of negroes to capture and demolish 1,009 feet of alligators, the
produce of which would be20 gallons of the coccus exterminating blood. Estimating,
then, the hire of each darkey at $1 a day, making $200 for 20 gallons of sanguinary
fluid, which might effectually syringe twenty oramge trees in a grove, and, without
mentioning the fees of the saurian phlebotomist, you have one of the most astounding
14162—Bull 18 2
18
examples of economy in labor that has ever yet soothed and flattered the otium cum
dignitate of a labor-shirking and a labor-saving world. Wonderful D. J. B.! Contid-
ing ex-Commissioner! Happy and grateful Floridians !”
A caricature on this theme, drawn by Mr. Glover in 1859, with him-
self portrayed as the “saurian phle-
botomist,” is presented herewith
(Fig. 3).
During the remainder of the year
1858, while in Florida, he was in-
dustriously employed with field
observations, visiting plantations
and groves in different parts of the
State, syringing whole groves of
orange trees, engraving his plates
and writing his notes, besides other
work for the Department, such as
collecting live oak acorns, ete. He
U orders the WS pains te Se eck ice was sick much of the time, and com-
abl gators /Secenti : : ie
te trees i seca nero ‘ehereey Ve aL oremae plains sorely of mosquitoes and simi-
Tes ee coh lumely beeaus seo orders comnot:
lar insect pests. A characteristic
entry in his journal is as follows:
“ Btching, itching, and scratching as usual from 8 to4; scratching with
pen from 8 till 12, and with finger nails continually.”
He severed his connection with the office very early in 1859. His
final report is published in the volume for 1858, and in the Commission- _
er’s report in the same volume the statement is made that ‘‘ the Ento-
mologist has brought his labors to aclose.” The principal reason for
his leaving the service was his inability to get along with the chief
clerk, whom he always considered of small ability, and a man who shone
only by borrowed light.
The appreciation of his efforts by others always gave Mr. Glover great
satisfaction. A little glimpse of this side of his nature, in statements
made confidentially to his cousin (Mr. Clapham), I trust will not be con-
sidered out of place here:
I am disgusted with United States service, as I have been situated, subject to the
whims and orders of a maceuvering and ignorant charlatan; no doubt I could re-en-
ter in winter if I wished, as all the members and Senators are friendly to my views,
but I will not unless I have more scope and privileges, and can do my work in my own
way. As soon asthe former Commissioner, the Hon. Judge Mason, heard of my being
out of the service he at once told me if I would accept a situation next fall in Iowa,
he would have me appointed to make an (agricultural) entomological survey of the
State; and my friend, Doctor Rock, writes to me that he is now endeavoring to have a
bill passed for that purpose. This was a great compliment, as Judge Mason is uni-
versally admitted to be one of the ablest and most intelligent officers who has ever
been in Government service and, as my chief, always treated me as well as possible.
At the same time he told me that ‘‘ he always considered me as one of the chief stays
of the Agricultural Bureau, if not the chief stay itself,” and paid me the compliment
that the service had lost one of its best men when I left. Such things written to you
Fig. 3.
19
may, and no doubt will, sound egotistical, but to me they are very gratifying, as
showing the feelings of my late chief.
It was at this time that he wrote:
Heaven only knows where my fate may lead me, for at present I am like a feather
wafted by the wind. If a good offer were made me, would start to-morrow for
either Van Dieman’s land or Kamschatka.
But his fate led him to remain in Washington City for a time, where
he occupied himself in making new acquaintances and gathering mate-
rials for the commencement of his work on American Entomology—
meanwhile using his influence toward the removal of the chief clerk,
D. J. Browne.
It has been said of Mr. Glover:
In his dealings with meu he was just even to a degree that was generous; but his
prejudices were strong and almost unyielding. He never forgot a kindness, nor was
he in tae least delinquent in his recognition of a favor.
It may be added that he never forgot an injury and rarely forgave it ;
and concerning his old chief, he always spoke in terms of most sub-
lime contempt. He attacked his plagiaristic failings by means of the
“deadly parallel” column, in the public press of the day, and wrote
pages besides. His life of D. J. B. (not published), in the form of a
dozen pen and ink caricatures, is as taking as a Thackeray sketch, the
drawing being superlatively grotesque, while the explanations abound
in telling hits. This set of drawings would bear reproduction were
they not so personal. (The alligator’s blood caricature is from this
series. )
<> 2
The eee a els
a hedl a dream which was now aha plenary : (Byron)
Fic. 4. An early caricature.
20
While upon this theme it may be mentioned that several of Mr.
Glover’s caricatures, nade at an earlier period, were reproduced in
copper by himself for the amusement of his friends. Many others, not
so reproduced, and done in ink or pencil, show him to have been a
caricaturist of no mean pretensions. The drawing is frequently gro-
tesque and the action superb, while the satire is most pointed. The
caricature habit followed him through life, many examples having beeu
made while he was entomologist of the Department of Agriculture.
These were more hastily drawn, however, and were destroyed as soon
as shown to a select circle of friends. But he was even more severe in
shafts of doggerel verse, which were often written upon the spur of the
moment, wholly impromptu, and by means of which he was able to hold
up to ridicule those (sometimes in high official position) who had of-
fended him. But he never allowed a duplicate copy to be made, and it
is doubtful if there is one in existence.
For several months Mr. Glover continued to reside in Washington,
and in the fall of the same year (1859) he entered the Maryland Agri-
cultural College as professor of natural sciences, though at a merely
nominal salary. Here he spent all of his time, when not engaged in field
work or in teaching and lecturing, in prosecuting the work on his re-
cently begun Illustrations of American Entomology, and in making a
collection of birds and insects. His life at the college was uneventful,
save that it gave him time to accomplish a vast amount of labor in two
important directions, and in April, 1863, about nine years after his first
connection with the Agricultural Bureau of the Patent Office, he was
appointed United States Entomologist, under Hon. Isaac Newton, the
new Department of Agriculture having been established in 1862, and
he entered upon the duties of the office at one.
His first reports, issued in 1863 and 1864, being for the most part
popular papers upon the more common insects injurious to vegetation
in the several orders, together with brief remedies for their destruction,
tell us little of his employment at this period. But we know that he
made a second beginning of his museum in August, 1864, the reports
of the time giving intimations of the new interest which was now ab-
sorbing his thoughts. Though the report for 1865 closes with another
popular paper (relating to the uses of insects from an economic stand-
point), the consideration of seeds, grains, fibers, silkworms, birds, poul-
try, and domestic animals, including Angora goats, explains the manner
in which a large share of his time was now occupied. He received con-
siderable assistance at this time from his confidential clerk, Mrs. L.
B. Adams, a lady of fine intellectual attainments, who had had some
experience in literary and editorial work, and who took a great inter-
estin the new museum. The first part of this report for 1865 gives evi-
dence of her assistance ; in fact the preparation of these documents was
the most difficult and irksome of Mr. Glover’s duties as entomologist:
He always shirked the responsibility as long as possible, and when it
21
could be put off no longer the work was begun and put through with
dispatch to the exclusion of everything else. He was not a ready
writer, and in much of his correspondence even, he first made a rough
draught of what he wished to say, from which the clean mailing copy was
afterwards prepared. Copies of official letters only were preserved, the
rule of the office requiring it, as during the entire period of Mr. Glover’s
term as entomologist the Commissioner of Agriculture signed all pub-
lic communications.
As to the manner of preparing his reports, they were usually written
in pencil, with scarcely any attempt at punctuation, little attention be-
ing paid to paragraphs or even to periods and capitals; the work of
putting into shape for pubiication, the most disagreeable of all employ-
ments for Mr. Glover, was then given to others—his earlier reports to
his confidential clerk and the later ones to the writer. He always
knew what he wanted to say, however, as far as subject-matter was
concerned, leaving expression to take care of itself. He wrote in con-
densed style, at times rushing over the paper rapidly, rarely referring to
authorities save where he wished to quote literally, with credit, pro-
ducing his manuscript “out of his head” mainly, from a rough outline
previously prepared, giving the subjects to be treated. The drawings
for illustration were prepared in two ways, either drawn carefully from
the insect and finished in ink, or they were cut from proofs of his cop-
per plates, and touched up or not as might be required, before sending
to the wood engraver or lithographer. The illustrations for his last re-
port on the Hymenoptera were all reproduced from figures cut from his
plates in this manner and arranged under his direction by others.
The months of August and September, 1865, were spent in Paris in
attendance upon the entomological convention held that year, and at
which he received the grand gold medal of the Emperor. This was given
for his work on entomology, which was adjudged by the jury “ to be orig-
inal in its style and character and deserving to be copied by the ento-
mologists of France as a desideratum inthe application of the science to
agriculture.” The notes concerning the entomological exhibition as
well as those relating to the industrial or economic museums visited by
him during his stay abroad, appear in the volume for 1865 as a second
report. Unquestionably this visit to Europe gave a great impetus to
his museum work, and by familiarizing himself with the systems in
vogue in other museums of a similar character, he was enabled to pro-
duce a better scheme for his own.
The year 1867 was marked by the sale of his collection of fruit models
to the Government, which, with the collection of birds, included in the
sale, and the mass of material gotten together during the two years
that had passed since the museum was established, made quite an in-
teresting exhibit. The scheme was now fairly realized, and, with the
increased correspondence which it imposed upon the division, and the
preparation of additions to its collections—now quite numerous—the
entomologist’s time was occupied by divided interests. The year 1867
22
was a busy one. The work of the division had increased so rapidly
that more help was necessary, and an assistant was assigned to him.
At this time Mr. Glover was very busy with the preparation of his
books of manuscript notes, particularly in Coleoptera and Lepidoptera,
adding to the mass of material which had accumulated for so many
years compilations from other authorities, to the end of “completing
to date” the histories of the insects he had figured. He was in frequent
correspondence at this time with Dr. Walsh, Messrs. Uhler, Riley, San-
born, Grote, and Robinson, and other leading entomologists, receiving
from them new material for the Department collection, or to be figured
in his work, sending them in return new species for description from
the material which was beginning to be received from colleetors in the
South and West. ale
The museum was now attracting considerable attention, and the num-
ber of visitors was steadily increasing. To a man of Mr. Glover's
enthusiastic temperament, so ready a means of imparting information
and proving to the world the value of his ideas as now presented it-
self, was not to be lost. So it came about that by no means the least
interesting of the objects there to be seen by visitors was the ento-.
mologist himself. Notwithstanding that Mr. Glover’s life for many
years had been that of a recluse—for in his devotion to his entomolog-
ical work it amounted to the same thing—he was a social being, and
thoroughly enjoyed meeting and talking with people of intelligence and
appreciation, whether strangers or not. It was a portion of the duties
of his assistants, at this time, to interest the museum visitors as far as
possible, and to explain to them its objects and uses. Professor Glover
kindly took upon himself a just proportion of this rather tedious occu-
pation—members of Congress, Senators, and other high officials, includ-
ing strangers who were in any way prominent, being his especial prey.
The professor always maintained that duty alone called him from his
desk upon these occasions ; but sometimes there were ladies in the par-
ties, and the frequent peals of langliter from a merry group convinced
us, in our quiet corners, that the entomologist might have made himself
a very agreeable society man had he chosen to divorce himself from work
long enough to indulge in such frivolous existence. None could blame
him if indeed this devotion to duty at such times was mere pretense,
for it was almost his only contact with the world, and “all work and
no play” does not conduce to the proverbial “ Jack’s” intellectual de-
velopment.
In these years he was residing at the corner of Seventh and H streets,
occupying a single room which he was pleased to call his “den,” and
in which, from choice, he ate, slept, wrote, sketched, engraved, and saw
his few intimate friends. What with his engraving and writing tables,
his book cases (constructed from boxes), trunks, tool-chest, and insect
cases, in addition to the stove and regular bedroom furniture, there was
little space te spare. But it was all he desired at the time, though a
very great change came over him in his manner of living a few years
23
later, after having taken up his abode on Twelfth street, near F street.
Though a single room was sufficient at first, the need of a parlor ere
long began to be appreciated; and he subsequently added to his suite
a bedroom for the use of his chance visitors. The larger part of his
library was brought to these apartments, bric-a-brac and souvenirs of
travel were displayed, his pictures hung; and as he never did anything
by halves, these accumulated so rapidly by purchase that the vacant ~
wall space of the three rooms was in time literally covered. A deserip-
tion of these apartments will not be out of place.
The carpeted floors were covered with skins of animals, some of them
quite valuable, and not altogether devoid of beauty. In two of the
windows were plants, and a mass of vines clambered to the ceiling.
Near a side window was an aquarium filled with fish, turties, and
aquatic plants, an ingenious fountain, of his own make, playing upon
some rock-work in the center, while English ivy was trained upon a wire
trellis around the window. The books were disposed in narrow, high
cases (boxes set one upon another, with glass-door fronts), and upon
the dressing-case between the front windows rested a heavy silver tank- —
ard, a family heirloom. The center table was covered with valuable
books, ceramics, and bric-a brac, the mantel opposite supporting a bronze
clock, with carvings and quaint metal work disposed about the shelf.
Against the paneling of the black mantel were hung a collection of
pipes gathered in his travels, some of them made by Indians. Around
the room upon light cireular stands were displayed several glass cases
of richly plumaged humming birds and gaudy exotic butterflies and
beetles ; and over a central book-case was perched a solemn white owl
in spectacles, reading its own history from a work on ornithology.
This was hisparlor. In the room adjoining (his bedroom) the wall upon
one entire side was covered with fire-arms, bows and arrows, toma-
hawks, and other warlike objects, a human scalp of long black hair
forming the rosette to one of his fantastic trophies. Another part of
the wall was devoted to rods, nets, and implements of piscatorial sport.
At one window stood his large writing table, and at the other a similar
table covered with his engraving tools, etching materials, bottles, boxes,
etc. Around the wood-work of the mantel-piece in this room were
hung cooking apparatus, certainly showing hard usage, and at the third
window, looking to the south, there were several cages of singing birds.
Some easy chairs, the bed, a stove, and a small refrigerator completed
the furnishing of the second room, while the third of the suite was
simply a bedroom, tastefully furnished and adorned. It was a veritable
curiosity shop where a very pleasant evening could be spent. I must
not forget the decanter of sherry, the French kisses and confections or
fruit, served upon pink shell plates, which always formed a part of his
welcome to his visitors. When there were no visitors, however, the
rooms were dark, save as lighted by a student lamp with a heavy green
shade which always stood upon his writing table in the corner of the
bedroom, for he was never idle when alone.
24
In 1868 the Department removed to its new building, and the ento-
mologist was assigned to better quarters. The three or four years
which followed were marked by no striking events, though Mr. Glover
labored on in his chosen work more indefatigably than ever, extending
his name and fame through the growth of his museum and through his
writings and large correspondence, as well as by the knowledge of his
progress in his work on entomology. It was during this time that a
large adjoining room to his own was granted him for the use of his
division, and for the establishment of an entomological cabinet. This
was fitted up with low show-cases similar to those in the museum, one
or two of which were supplied with drawers for the insect collections.
Mr. Glover took very little interest in the entomological cabinet, how-
ever, either in the preparation of the specimens and their classification
and arrangement or as a matter of reference afterward. But he always
went carefully through all new collections as soon as received, in search
of fresh material for his work, laying aside such as interested him, after
which the remainder of the collection had no further attraction for him.
He was interested in having a collection, though he often declared that
a series of well-drawn colored figures were quite as useful.
Now comes the publishing period of his life, if it may be so termed,
the years from 1872 to 1878, during which time he issued four volumes
and distributed twelve sets of his entire work, all except the Lepidop-
tera being supplied with the names. In 1871 he took up the Orthoptera,
which had been neglected by him for many years, and added half a
dozen or more plates, the labors of Mr. Cyrus Thomas upon new west-
ern material (from the surveys and elsewhere) proving the incentive. His
Orthoptera was published in 1872, and was followed at intervals of two
years or less by the other works. This matter is fully discussed, how-
ever, in another chapter.
The incessant labor of this period, with little exercise and no recrea-
tion—noteven the Sabbath rest—told heavily upon Mr. Glover. He
took no leaves of absence, though repeatedly urged to do so, although
occasional visits to the country or to Baltimore, upon Sundays in sum-
mer, gave him a little change from the monotony of his every-day ex-
istence. At one time he had a strong desire to visit Floridaagain, and
later, after partially recovering from his first serious illness, he was
strongly advised to go, his old friend, Mr. Wells (‘ Alligator”) being
suggested as a companion on the trip. He continued at his work, how-
ever, though in the last year or two of his official life he was more care-
ful of his health, eating more rationally and regularly, and partaking
less of cold or such ready-cooked food as could be eaten at any time.
He now devoted the Sunday afternoons, when pleasant, to walking, in
company with the gentleman with whom he resided, and seemed less
averse to having his evenings broken in npon by visitors. He even
went out now and then evenings, when he could have the company of
a friend to and from his lodgings, as it was difficult for him to get about
easily after dark, and he disliked to be in the streets alone on account
25
of his defective vision. For this reason, during the last ten years of
his life he attended no meetings of scientific or other societies, not even
the meetings of the Masonic lodge of which he had been a member.
But the long years of constant application, together with possible im-
prudences in his manner of living and exposure to malarial climates at
earlier periods, broke him down at last. We missed him from his ac-
customed place one morning, and when an hour had passed and he did
not appear the circumstance was so unusual that a messenger was
dispatched to his rooms to learn the cause of his detention. The an-
swer was returned that Mr. Glover was very ill. How ill was not ap-
preciated by the writer until, standing by his bedside and listening to
his incoherent utterances, the unwelcome thought was forced upon the
mind that his labors were nearly finished. And so it proved, for al-
though he recovered in a measure from this sudden prostration and
lived for several years, he was never able to resume his work, save as
he interested himself in some such slight occupation, for sake of reliev-
ing ennui, as copying lists of names to accompany his plates. Though
his successor, Charles V. Riley, was soon appointed, he was still con-
tinued on the rolls of the Department at a less salary, coming to the
office as he was able, although in reality he rendered no service. But
in time his health further failed him. His disease had made such in-
roads upon his once iron constitution that it was unsafe for him to re-
side in Washington away from his friends, and then he unwillingly
left Washington to take up his residence in Baltimore with his adopted
daughter, Mrs. D. C. Hopper.
Of the remaining years of his life there is little that can be written.
Feeling that his active labors were over, he disposed of his entomologi-
cal library, presented his birds, exotic insects, and other natural his-
tory specimens to the Druid Park Museum, and, as he had already
memorialized Congress for the sale of his plates, his MSS. having been
deposited with Professor Baird at the Smithsonion Institution, there
was little to occupy his thoughts but his own sufferings and the trifling
things of every day existence. Thus, almost blind and too feeble to go
far from home alone, he virtually retired from the world.
After so many years of busy life in the nation’s capital, the reaction
produced by the life of positive repose, both mental and physical, which
followed his coming to Baltimore must have been terrible. The full
force of the suggestion never came to me until the occasion of my first
visit to him amid his new surroundings. He evinced a boyish pleas-
ure at seeing me, and his eye brightened as kind messages were given
him from friends and associates in Washington, or when the old life
was touched upon; but withal an air of sadness made itself apparent
which told me that he was not altogether happy. Passing over other
visits I come to the last one, some months before he died, the recollec-
tion of which is as vivid as though it were but yesterday. Tor a time
he seemed like his old self, save that suffering and disease had laid a
heavy hand upon him; but after a while he began to talk of himself,
26
and with a voice husky with emotion, and with eyes suffused with tears,
he told me how unhappy he was and how he longed for the end to come.
Among other things he felt keenly the neglect of his old friends, some
of whom were residing then in Baltimore, and whom, he said, had never
called upon him or helped to relieve in any way the monotony of his
existence. My leave-taking from him on this occasion was most pain-
ful. I remained with him as long as I could do so, but when time
came to depart he clung to my hand like a child, walking with me out
upon the door-step, and stood looking after me as I walked away. I
never saw him again. His death came peacefully on the 7th of Sep-
tember, 1883, surrounded by his immediate family, his wife, and adopted
daughter, and he was laid at rest in the Loudon Park Cemetery, near
Baltimore. \
One who knew Mr. Glover intimately for twenty or more years of his
life has said of him, ‘In his personal habits and intercourse he was
peculiar.” He was peculiar even to the verge of eccentricity, yet in
summing up the many traits of his character, to his very peculiarities
is due mainly the measure of success in life to which he attained. He
was a man of few friends. In bis youth the friendship of one or two
enthusiastic boy lovers of nature, like himself, who could enter into his
pursuits and think as he thought, satisfied him. In middle life, after a
residence of five years in Washington, he says of himself, in touching
upon this theme, ‘Acquaintances I have made many, but friends none.”
That he made few friends I think was due to several causes—a slight
distrust of mankind in tbe first place, coupled with a feeling that too
close intimacy would bring a greater or less degree of annoyance. Then
he wasa man so thoroughly interested and absorbed in his own pursuits
that few who came in contact with him, particularly in later life, found
in him that responsiveness or congeniality that one expects to call out
in a thorough man of the world. But it may be said of him, once a
friend always a friend.
Not averse to society, he enjoyed himself in it, yet in general terms
he regarded time spent in complying with its demands asso many hours
wasted. I scarcely ever knew a man whose character was made up of
such opposing traits. He was most generous in many things which, in
the estimation of the world, go to make up generosity, yet in the matter
of personal concerns, as far as the world went, his self-interest was so
absorbing thatit left no heed for the interests of others. ‘Never trouble
Mr. Glover with your own affairs” was a gentle hint conveyed to me as
a piece of advice a few months after I became his assistant. Heeding
it, I won, in time, his friendship, and then another side of his nature
was revealed tome. An exacting task-master with himself at all times,
he demanded fuli and unhesitating compliance with his wishes, when
once made known, from those over whom he exercised authority ; and
yet where the disposition was shown to be diligent and faithful or ioyal
‘
2U
he allowed the largest liberty. Strong in his opinions, preferring that
his own suggestions should take precedence of the suggestions of oth-
ers whom he thought less thoroughly informed upona given subject, he
was never unreasonable save when the views of others ran counter to
his prejudices, and then he was as inflexible asiron. A little child could
lead him, but a regiment of soldiers could not drive him.
In disposition he was serious but rarely melancholy or cynical. On
the contrary, he had arare fund of humor and a keen sense of the ridicu-
lous, appreciating a joke whether at his own expense or the expense
of a friend, and never losing an opportunity for its enjoyment. His sa-
tire was pointed, his sarcasm cutting, the most common modes of ex-
pression being caricature and verse, in either of which he was very
ready. But he could also write very pleasant verse in a humorous vein
when wrought up to his subject, two examples of which, in my posses-
sion, ‘*The Velocipede” and “A Valentine” (and very personal to the
writer) are highly-prized mementoes. ‘He never forgot a kindness,”
and it was not easy for him to forgive an injury, nor did he ever regain
confidence in those who deceived him or endeavored to use him. Of a
jealous nature, he was sometimes suspicious, and like many others with
this disposition, he was quick-tempered, and his anger, when aroused,
for the time being was almost uncontrollable.
Susceptible to the world’s praise, he shrank from its censure, which
may be given as one reason for his never having described an insect.
Mr. Glover could never have been a specialist. While recognizing the
importance of, and necessity for, technical work to the end of settling
the vexed questions of classification and synonomy, he had no patience
with those whom he designated as *‘ species grinders,” and in his private
discourse was often quite denunciatory in his criticisms of their work.
He often made the boast that he had never named an insect, and as often
declared it to be his opinion that many of the existing species in our
lists were but varieties. In his entomological work generally he was
exceedingly cautious in making statements and averse to “rushing
into print;” he often underrated his own judgment in an endeavor to
be on the side of fact, and he was always just in giving credit to others.
In his habits of living he chose to be untrammelled by the conven-
tionalities of custom, attending to necessities of existence in a way that
offered the least personal inconvenience to himself. So the man who
from having moved in the cultivated society of his home on the Hud-
son, had in the performance of duty come to “herd with negroes and
Indians in Demerara, where a white man is as good as a darkey,” or
summered in the Florida swamps ‘“ with pet alligators and rattlesnakes,”
found it no hardship to prepare a simple breakfast while the wax was
hardening upon his copper plate, or to eat it, while perchance the acid
was eating into the shining metal. His walk at sundown and his restau-
rant dinner later, his chief mental and physical recreation, gave him
zest for his evening’s work.
28
He was methodical without being systematic. His very life in later
years was a life of routine only broken here and there by Sabbath
visits to “* Woodside,” the childhood home of his adopted daughter. Nor
was he idle during these visits, for upon his return Monday morning he
always brought back a considerable amount of fresh entomological ma-
terial, the result of his field rambles and excursions, frequently an-
nouncing a new fact or discovery, or displaying some unknown larve
to rear, and always exhibiting something interesting.
His enthusiasm was the maipspring of his endeavor, his untiring in-
dustry, coupled with method, the means of accomplishing the under-
takings which it prompted. He cared little for the good opinion of the
world as far as relativg to himself personally, but he not only found
pleasure in, but invited appreciation of, his utilitarian schemes. It was
a great satisfaction to him to feel that he possessed the friendship and
esteem of the leading scientific men of his age, but he never courted
their favor, and his modesty led him to shrink from posing as a con-
spicuous figure among them.
Had he lived to complete his work in his own way and found means
to publish it in its entirety the world would have had a better appre-
ciation of the immensity and scope of the undertaking than any sim-
ple statements of friend or biographer will ever convey.
I will close this brief sketch with a tribute to Mr. Glover from the
pen of an intimate friend, written in 1874, which appeared in Field and
Forest four years after. The last two stanzas proved prophetic.
THE PROFESSOR.
[Inscribed to Professor G———.]
Little cares he for the world, but sits
Till evening, from earliest dawn,
And figures and etches and writes,
And the work goes bravely on.
And a monument grows, day by day,
That shall tell to the world his fame
When marble has crumbled away—
And he silentiy carves his name.
Carves it in Nature’s soft lines,
With a graver skilled and true ;
And the acid eats till the eye defines
The ontline of promise in view.
And the days and years go fleeting by,
Tasks are finished and new ones set ;
Still the end is not, nor draweth nigh—
There are pages unwritten yet.
Pages unwritten that ever will be,
For the longest life isa span—
That his dream may approach reality,
He is working while he can.
HISTORY OF HIS WORK ON ENTOMOLOGY.
Mr. Glover commenced his immense work on insects, known as “ I]lus-
trations of North American Entomology,” in 1859. Portions of the
work, that is, special plates of the orange and cotton insects, were en-
graved a year or two prior to that date; in fact, it may be said that he
made two or three beginnings prior to the commencement of his ulti-
mate scheme. ac<- cee jee es oO 18 281
MIptera) hence css csescciecceeeesctes 13 520 | Nieuropienay 2 soem tease oe nee 7 92
PHOMID UCLA! sh hs 5 5 eric oes siee = 16 464 || Cotton and its insects -..-...... 22 215
52
title-page, a few introductory pages of classification, and catalogues of
species with references accompanying each order. The slips of names
(save the Lepidoptera) were pasted upon each plate just under the fig-
ures, the page being of quarto size. Of these 12 copies, which were of
course uncolored, 5 were sent to Europe, and 5 distributed here. Two
other copies were sold with bis library afterwards. Several copies, in
the hands of individuals or institutions, were later on ordered to be
colored, the writer having bad the work done from Mr. Glover’s origi-
nals, by a competent colorist. A list of institutions and individuals to
whom these sets were sent was made by me at the time of the distribu-
tion, but can not now be produced. One other formal publication, is-
sued in 1877, should be mentioned. I refer to the compilation of refer-
ences to the insects treated in his own and other reports, issued by the
United States Department of Agriculture and by the Patent Office, to
date of publication. It contains also a list of animal and vegetable
substances injured or destroyed by the insects referred to, the entire
volume making 103 pages, printed from stone, upon one side of the
sheet, in fac-simile, uniform with his other publications. A few sets of
his cotton plates were also distributed, bound up with a type-printed
title-page and cover.
While upon the history of Mr. Glover’s undertaking, it should be
stated that among several plans looking toward the ultimate disposition
of the work, in the event of its not being published prior to the author’s
death, there were two plans, at least, entertained by him in the latter
part of the centennial year, in which the United States Government
was wholly ignored. The first of these, which considered leaving the
work to some institution in England, with means to publish it, was
hardly seriously contemplated ; for being a work upon American insects
exclusively, it was not thought at all likely that it would claim the same
interest in England as in America. The other plan did receive consid-
eration to the extent of an inquiry of the authorities of Johns Hopkins
University, in Baltimore, as to the acceptance of a trust fund to be left
for the purpose of promoting the study of entomology. In response to
this inquiry Mr. Glover learned that the consent of the trustees could
be obtained by President Gilman to the acceptance of a given sum, to
be known as the Glover fund, the donor to specify the manner in which
he preferred the income to be spent, as follows: Either in promoting
investigation, in publishing plates and texts, or in the delivery of lec-
tures. But the plan was never consummated.
At last came his sudden and prostrating illness, in the spring of 1878,
and he retired from active labor of any kind.
Regarding the sale of his plates—in January, 1879, during the third
session of the Forty-fifth Congress, Mr. Glover first memorialized that
body, proposing to transfer to the Government the entire series, together
with the text of his entomological work. A special bill providing for
the transfer was not introduced, but the memorial was referred to the
Senate Committee on Agriculture. Professor Baird took great interest
53
in the matter, personally appearing before the committee to explain the
nature, value, and importance of the work, as well as the fact that the skill-
ful engravings of the copper plates themselves were the work of the pro-
fessor’s own hand, and had involved most unremitting labor for a period
of over twenty years. The committee showed little interest in the sub-
ject, however, notwithstanding that the memorial was accompanied by
another recommending the purchase of the work, and signed by the
prominent entomologists of the country, among whom were the United
States entomologist, professors of Yale, Harvard, and other colleges, °
and members of leading scientific societies. During the first session of
the succeeding Congress the matter was again brought to the attention
of the Committee on Agriculture, and a letter addressed to Professor
Baird from the chief engraver of the Bureau of Engraving and Print-
ing was submitted. In this letter it was stated that any skilled en-
graver would charge $100 for each of these plates, and if they were
engraved by a scientist they were worth more. Senator Davis, of West
Virginia, chairman of the committee, suggested that the committee
would recommend the purchase at a cost of $7,500; but the committee
took no formal action. This was a great disappointment to Professor
Glover, who was now anxious that the work should be purchased by
the Government, even at a nominal valuation. At the next session the
matter was brought to the attention of the House Committee on Agri-
culture, and the sum of $7,500 for the purchase of the work was included
in the sundry civil appropriation bill, and finally passed both houses,
Professor Riley using his influence towards its final passage. The
money became available soon after, and was paid to Professor Glover
early in April ensuing the 4th of March upon which Congress adjourned ;
but by this time he had become quite infirm. The result was very grati-
fying to him, though he died in September following.
No formal transfer of the plates was necessary after the purchase, as
they were already in the custody of the National Museum, having beep
deposited there by the writer after consultation with Professor Baird
at the time when Mr. Glover was first stricken and unable to act for
himself.
As to the value of his work, it gave Mr. Glover great pleasure while
living to know that it was appreciated by the late Professor Agassiz
and leading scientific men of his day. Speaking of the “ collections of
drawings,” Professor Agassiz attests ‘their excellence and great im-
portance, both in a scientific and economical point of view,” and con-
sidered “ the publication of his observations, and of the delineations of
insects injurious to vegetation as most desirable, and likely to be in
the highest degree creditable to the United States Government.” Dur-
ing the savant’s last visit to Washington, while calling upon Prof. John
W. Hoyt to talk of the proposed national university, his opinion was
asked as to the sort of work that Professor Glover was doing. Agassiz’s
reply was: ‘Magnificent! His services are extremely valuable, and
54
should he ever have occasion to leave the Department he can have a
place in the Museum of Comparative Zoology on his own terms.”
Many extracts from the letters of entomologists might be here given,
showing the estimation in which the work was held, for Mr. Glover had
many friends in the scientific world who knew him only by his labors
in this, his chosen field. But one extract will be quoted, however, from
a letter written to me by Mr. William H. Edwards, when it was first
suggested that the Government should purchase Mr. Glover’s plates :
DEAR Sir: I am very glad to hear that an effort is making to secure for the coun-
try Professor Glover’s copper plates of the insects of the United States and his manu-
script relating thereto. These materials are invaluable to us, and should Professor
Glover dispose of them in England or elsewhere the loss could never be made good.
Being an enthusiastic entomologist, as well as artist, these plates have been to hima
labor of love, and he has given to them the better part of a life-time, and executes
them with the greatest fidelity. His work on the cotton insects is beyond al: praise.
I know of nothing comparable to it on the range of entomological illustrated litera-
ture, and the plates of this work and notes belonging to them are worth, in my opin-
ion, to the country the full sum that Professor Glover requires for the entire lot of
plates and manuscript.
In giving my own estimate of this work I must regard it from the
stand-point of view that will show the intention of its author. He
never proposed to put it forth as a technical work, or as a learned con-
tribution to science, for the instruction or better information of special-
ists, advanced students, or entomological investigators already possess-
ing large libraries and collections, but he did propose to make it, when
fuliy completed, a work of referance for all orders of insects in the popu-
lar sense of the term, for all who might be seeking general information
upon subjects relating to American entomology. In his conception of
the work, as in that of his museum plan, but one idea was aimed at—
utility. It was a favorite word with Professor Glover, and whether his
original intention was a work of 80 plates or 300, or the text of 100 or
1,000 pages, his only thought was to make it so simple and so useful
that a farmer with no appreciation of entomological science could con-
sult it as he would a dictionary, and learn something of the subject
upon which he desired to inform himself. It was to be, in short, an
illustrated encyclopedia of economic entomology, and if it had been fin-
ished and published in accordance with the author’s design, there would
be nothing now in entomological literature like it. It certainly would
be wrong to judge it by his gratuitous publications. And no one, after
fully understanding the scope and design of the work, and examining
the great mass of material which represents the labor of twenty years
of Mr. Glover’s active life, will deny either its utility or its value for
the purpose for which it was intended.
Supposing the work had been published in its entirety, and dis-
tributed in the manner Mr. Glover proposed it should be, among agri:
cultural societies, to town libraries, etce.: A farmer of average intelli-
gence, we will say, comes, with an unknown insect in hand, to consult
it. It would require very slight entomological knowledge to enable
him to refer to the list of food plants to learn how many and what in-
5D
sects lived upon the particular farm crop (or plant) which had been in-
jured. This information obtained, with no knowledge whatever of
classification, he would be able, by means of the plates, to find the cul-
prit in a very little time, even if the figures were not sufficiently accu-
rate for the determination of fine specific differences. Having learned
the species, or even an allied species, reference from plate to text would
put him in possession of the main facts in the history of the insect, time
of appearance of different stages of the pest, and when and how to com-
bat it. And if the information given was not sufficient he could make
use of the references to other works there quoted.
This is, briefly, the: manner in which the work was intended to be™
used, and, as it contains over 6,000 figures of insects more or less in-
jurious (or beneficial) to American agricuiture, I may repeat that noth-
ing like it has ever before been attempted, and that its completion and
publication would have served to vastly popularize the science of ento-
mology in the United States. But while its production is a marvel of
patience, persistence, and self-sacrificing iudustry, in the twenty years
its author was engaged upon it, he might have so systematized the work
of its production—calling others to his assistance to relieve himself of
the mere drudgery—and so have organized the plan of publication that
it would have been completed and placed in every large library of the
land while he was yet entomologist of the Department of Agriculture.
The point has been made that some of Mr. Glover's figures are not
ultogether accurate, if not in some instances badly drawn. The criti-
cism is sometimes a just one, although in their entirety the drawings
will bear favorable comparison with similar entomclogical illustrations
of the times. One point must be admitted, that the earlier plates are
much better than the later ones, as will readily be seen by careful com-
parison. That thisis due to two causes there can be little doubt: Some-
what impaired, or gradually failing eyesight in the first place (the more
positive cause), and less carein the second place, through impatience
to keep up with incoming material. The completion of two plates a
month, ‘out of office hours,” and in the hours of daylight, with all the
work of making the drawings before undertaking the engraving, and
coloring six or eight sets of the proofs afterwards, should be regarded as
expeditious work for a man sixty years of age. Mr. Glover himself re-
gretted having made certain of the plates (early ones inthe Lepidoptera),
chiefly taken from Smith and Abbott’s Insects of Georgia, and from a
few later works. Some of the far western Orthoptera, too, which were
figured from alcoholi¢ specimens, and colored from descriptions, or
from other figures, and sometimes from notes made by the collector, are
not wholly satisfactory, although readily recognizable by those who
have seen the insects in life. Fault has likewise been found with his
smaller figures, many of which should have been enlarged to show
specific differences in a marked degree, natural size being indicated in
the usual manner or by a second figure. All very minute species were
properly enlarged, and are, therefore, more valuable.
36
For purposes of ordi nary identification ina general work of reference, as
this was intended to be, little fault need be found with the major portion of
the series. Ofcourse this presupposes that the plates were to be colored,
as it was not the author’s idea to issue them in any other way In fact the
very manner of engraving the figures shows this to be the case. In the
plates that were published by him, only half the editions were sent out
uncolored, and this only because of the great expense attending coloring
so many sets by hand—the distribution being entirely gratuitous.
In these days of cheapened processes for multiplied color reproduction
this matter isa serious obstacle in the way of future publication of Mr.
Glover’s plates by the Government. Even if an edition of the plates
should be issued, without the text they do not tell the whole story,
and the text is not finished; and in several orders the material is hardly
Systematized or arranged. The plates, if published alone, with only
the names, would possess a certain value even if not colored, and it
would be better to publish in this manner than not at all. Regarding
the question of coloring, if sets of the entire series were distributed
gratuitously by tlie Government, the recipients could well afford to have
them colored afterwards at their own expense from the original set.
Through combinations of a number of persons, so that a large contract
could be given out, the work could be done possibly at $35 to $40 per
set, which would be cheap for such a complete series of illustrations.
In regard to the publisied volumes which bear Mr. Glover’s name,
these are valuable from tbeir very scarcity, and from the fact that they
are all he has given us in published form, save the reports which have
appeared from time to time in Government publications. As works
giving a certain amount of information on two or three somewhat neg-
lected orders of insects they are useful; but from the stand-point of
scientific worth they are more valuable as Series of named plates than
as scientific publications—the often fragmentary and incomplete text
giving little hint of the author’s years of observation and study in the
field and vivarium.
As for the name and fame of the author, a published work compris-
ing an entire set of the plates alone is a sufficient monument to his un-
tiring industry, indomitable perseverance and skill, and to his faithful
labors through a period of twenty-five years for the advancement of
American entomological science. He wished to do more, but through
the limit set upon human endurance and existence he fell just a little
short of carrying out his great purpose. He did not strive for fame
through any contributions to the vast store-house of technical knowl-
edge, or the dry-dust records of closet investigation that he might have
made, nor did he ever wish to be considered an authority. But he early
realized the difficulties which beset the way of the student of nature,
and that other student of practical rural economy, in obtaining a knowl-
edge of the insect forms about them, at a time when there were few
books and fewer named collectious, and set to work to remedy the matter
as far as he was able.
THE GLOVER MUSEUM.
As has been stated in the biographical sketch of Mr. Glover’s life,
the museum scheme was contemplated many years before it was realized.
Indeed its first inception dates back prior to 1850, before be had left his
home on the Hudson. Regarding his collection of fruit models he
writes in 1866:
The design is to obtain from each State samples of the various fruits which have
been tried and proved; to have them modeled here, retaining one copy to be added
to the national collection, and returning duplicates (and matrices), correctly named,
to each agricultural society.
Fifteen years before this, in 1851, he made the proposition to the
Massachusetts Horticultural Society to do this same thing, and some
specimens were furnished, made from fruits sent to Mr. Glover by mem-
bers of the society. Allusions to ‘“*the specimens for the New York
State Society,” in a letter written at this period, also shows that the
idea was a very old one with its author. And all these early attempts
at exhibition tended directly towards the museum idea.
The first attempt to fully carry out the scheme was made in 1854, in
the single room which at that time constituted the Patent Office Bureau
of Agriculture; the fruit models being the chief display. At this
period they were his private property, though a year or two Jater the
proposition was made to dispose of them to the Government for $10,000.
The precise facts regarding early legislation on the subject can not be
given. Butin 1858 we learn that Mr. Glover had seen a number of gen-
tlemen, whom he names; that ‘everything appears favorable ;” and
“that the bill” will be put on ‘‘as an amendment.” Then we learn
of his showing the fruits to members of Congress, whoapproved of the
idea, and promised to vote for the purchase. Meanwhile he leaves
Washington for the field, and while pushing his investigations he
learns that the bill has been defeated by ‘Letcher and Marshall,” of
Virginia. This characteristic entry follows: ‘“ Will remember them for
it. Intend to resign in the fall, and offer to South Carolina or Mary-
land.” Asa matter of history the bill was passed, though Mr. Glover
did not receive the money, through ‘ misappropriation of funds.” In
1867, however, the purchase was consummated, the sum of $10,000 be-
ing appropriated for the purpose, Hon. J. W. Stokes, then acting
Commissioner of Agriculture, having been instrumental in effecting its
passage.
57
58
To go bavk again to the year 1856, he makes statements on the sub-
ject, in a letter to his cousin, which throws interesting light on the
museum scheme. He says:
I ask $10,000 for the whole, with the proviso that I work six years to finish the
grand undertaking of modeling all the fruits, esculent roots, ete., of the United
States, and label them with the name, synonym, habit, soil, etc., so as to form the
nucleus of a grand National Agricultural Museum. How do you like the plan?
The difference to Mr. Glover between selling his fruits in 1856 and in
1867 was, that before the war he would have received this money in
gold, whereas he received it in a ‘depreciated currency ;” and, in ad-
dition to the fruit models, gave a collection of 600 specimens of birds,
which he had subsequently prepared and brought together, at consider-
able expense of money and time, while at the Maryland Agricultural
College. Even while connected with this institution, his labors, still
in the line of the practical and utilitarian, were directed towards the
acquirement of a collection. Mr. Glover was a skillful taxidermist,
and was a capital shot, notwithstanding the peculiarity of his eye-sight ;
and as he tramped over the adjacent country, cane-gun in hand, using
it also as a walking-stick, he doubtless appeared more as a rural gen-
tleman than the enthusiastic naturalist that he was.
In August, 1864, the new museum was founded in the rooms of the
recently established Department of Agriculture. At this time the
models (some 3,000 in number) and the collection of birds above men-
tioned constituted the major portion of the cabinet. This was soon
augmented by donations, solicited or otherwise, or by occasional pur-
chases, and a mass of material was very soon gotten together repre-
senting, in one way or another, nearly every portion of the country. In-
sects, birds, plants, and botanical specimens, cereal products, fibers, and
the products of industrial art and manufacture were all included in the
collections, and the museum was fairly established. From this time for-
ward, up to and including the centennial year, its growth was steady
and rapid.
Regarding the plan or scheme of arrangement, which was most com-
plete in detail, it is not necessary to go into particulars here, as it is
fully described on page 27 of the Annual Report of the Department of
Agriculture for the year 1866.
Briefly, the museum was to be embraced in three divisions—a general,
State, and economic. The first he was to illustrate by complete series
of specimens of each of the various agricultural products from the seed,
through all stages of growth and after preparation for human use, up
to the highest range of manufacture. In the State division would be
shown the classified products of each State and Territory, including
minerals, soils, vegetable products, and manufactures; while in the eco-
nomic division would be displayed the commercial products of the vege-
table kingdom from every portion of the world. It was a grand scheme,
but too immense to be fully carried out in the cramped quarters assigned
59
to it, and in the days of ridiculously small appropriations. And here
pardon a digression. In one of the biographical sketches of the man,
which appeared at the time of his death, 1t is said that ‘‘ during his en-
tire service he never asked for special appropriations for tbe pursuit of
investigations in any particular interest.” This is true, but while he
never “asked” for appropriations—. e., by persistent personal labor
with committeemen—he never lost the opportunity to explain to Con-
gressmen or other visitors of influence the benefits to be derived by
American agriculture in the establishment of such a museum in Wash-
ington; and he always closed with a tersely-put statement as to the
ridiculously small sums of money that were available from the annual
appropriations with which to carry on the work. And upon one ocea-
sion, some years after the establishment of the museum, he made such
an impression upon an enthusiastic committeeman who was visiting the
collections that the sum of $3,000 was shortly afterward appropriated
for the museum, to be spent under Mr. Glover’s special direction. It
nearly took his breath away, and, as his assistant, [ well remember how
hard it was to get him to use all of the money, as any unexpended bal-
ance at the end of the fiscal year would be turned back in the Treasury,
the reluctant purchase of a microscope nearly using up the amount re-
maining on hand the last of June.
It was natural for him to talk the museum scheme to all who would
listen. He believed in his plan, thought over it, worked for its perfec-
tion, confidently believing in its ultimately attaining the fullest realiza-
tion of success. The two rooms in the Patent Office were soon filled to
overflowing ; and when the designs were being made for the new build-
ing to be erected for the Department of Agriculture an exhibition hall,
50 by 100 feet in dimension, was contemplated, which it was thought
would be ample for the purpose. This was occupied in the fall of 1868,
twelve walnut cases having been provided for the reception of the va-
rious collections at that time brought together. But even in the new hall
the “plan” was hardly fulfilled in the arrangement. The “ State divi-
sion” was represented by a single case of California products, the other
two divisions not being distinctively indicated, the entire museum being
at the same time “ general” and ‘“ economic,” as its specific collections
were as yet Small and very incomplete.
As a man of deep originality and thought may make a wonderful dis-
covery or produce a valuable invention, and yet find himself lacking in
that worldly knowledge which would enable him to apply it with the
least difficulty to the uses of every-day life, so it was to a certain degree
with Mr. Glover in relation to his admirable museum scheme. Stronger
as an originator, or an investigator, than as an organizer, he lacked in
a measure executive ability. He wasable to outline and perfect a splen-
did system, but unable to carry it out save as he might do so through
the untiring labor of his own hands. This was the one drawback in the
preparation of his great work on entomology ; and it showed itselfin the
60
building up of his museum in a marked degree after it had reached a
certain point in its growth. The fact may be stated that in carrying
out the museum scheme it was notdeveloped beyond this certain point,
and the suggestion is offered that the theory of its arrangement may
have interested him more than the thing itself; for, with his devotion
to his work on entomology, which was an all-absorbing interest at this
period, he could not have given his time and thought to both. It was
the dlustration of the conception of the plan, and not the museum as a
whole, that was almost daily presented to its visitors.
For example: The California case was always inspected to illustrate
the State division and the arrangement of its minerals, its vegetable
products, and its manufactures explained. Turning to the collections of
fruit in other cases near, the model of the Baldwin apple was invaria-
bly exhibited, showing its manner of growth in various sections of the
country, thus demonstrating the localities where special fruits thrived
best. Stepping to another case, the bluebird was always pointed out,
with the distinctive mark upon its perch showing that it was a friend
and not a foe to the farmer; and a little box of insect remains from its
stomach, by its side, furnished the proofof his statement. Flaxseed in
variety was shown in another case, illustrating the “ general” museum,
together with the fiber in various stages of growth and manipulation to
the most delicate linen fabrics, and in the same manner the seed, oil,
and oil cake.
The scheme was most complete and admirable, reflecting the great-
est credit upon its originator, and if carried out would have made it
one of the grandest economic museums in the world. But it would have
necessitated a building larger than the entire Department of Agricult-
ure, and the outlay of many thousands of dollars, with the one draw-
back that in its State division there would have been endless repeti-
tion of the same thing, unless somewhat modified. Mr. Glover appre-
ciated this fully, and there was never an attempt, beyond the points of
illustration noted, to make it other than an economic museum of agri-
culture on the simplest possible basis of display. These statements are
made to explain in a measure why so valuable and utilitarian a scheme
of arrangement was never fully completed.
As an economic museum or “object library” the collections increased,
at first slowly, then rapidly, so rapidly in fact that it was difficult to
supply case-room as fast as the specimens came in. It literally out-
grew the long entertained plan of arrangement, and as Mr. Glover be-
came more aud more absorbed in his entomological work he finally
threw the greater part of the responsibility of the museum from off his
shoulders altogther, his assistants having charge of and carrying on
the work in its several branches, while he assumed merely nominal
control. By this time the collection of fruit models had been greatly
augmented by Prof. William H. Seaman, who had charge of this branch,
as well as the microscopic work of the Division, a large series of the
61
principal vegetables also having been added; while a regularly ap-
pointed taxidermist, Mrs. Teresa Drexler, made considerable additions
to the collections of birds and poultry. Miss Caroline C. Moulton was
mnseum attendant.
Then the preparations for the Centennial Exhibition of 1876 were in-
augurated, the supervision of the work of getting up the museum ex-
hibit devolving upon the assistant entomologist,* who, co-operating af-
terwards with Professor Baird, was enabled to almost double the eol-
lections of the department from foreign exhibits, necessitating the erec-
tion of a gallery on each side of the museum hall.
Mr. Glover had by this time so far lost interest in the museum, being
now wholly absorbed in his entomological work and its publication,
that when the acquisition of this great mass of material necessitated a
better classification and arrangement of the museum display the for-
mulation of anew plan of arrangement was left entirely to the writer,
The classification which was then devised is published at the end of
the entomologist’s report in the annual volume for 1877, pages 118 to
148,t in a special report made to Mr. Glover.
It may be stated that the scheme of arrangement set forth in this
published classification was closely followed in the reorganization which
shortly followed.
The museum was now (1877) at the zenith of its importance and use-
fulness, and shortly after its decline began. The first calamity which
occurred to it was the loss of many of its large and valuable collections
gathered at the Centennial, which, for want of afew hundred dollars
worth of display bottles and other material suitable for their exhibition,
asked for and repeatedly refused, remained stored in the garret above
the museum hall. Through the officiousness of the property clerk of
the department, appointed by Commissioner Le Duc, or by the Com-
missioner’s order, this mass of material was either sold to a junk dealer
or thrown on a rubbish heap, according to its market value at “junk”
prices, and thousands of dollars’ worth of valuable museum material
wasted and destroyed. Then followed Mr. Glover’s retirement from
active duty, and as the assistant entomologist shortly after resigned,
and other changes had occurred in the museum corps, the museum was
practically left without care, as no regular curator was appointed for
several years. Dr. Vasey was given nominal charge for a time, but his
own duties as botanist were sufficient to occupy his whole attention.
The remainder of the story is briefly told. A wooden exhibition build-
ing had been erected in one corner of the department grounds for the dis-
play of railroad exhibits and other similar exposition displays. More
*See Agricultural Report for 1876, p. 17.
tThe entomologist reluctantly incorporated this museum report and classification
into his own report, signing his name to the two documents in one to avoid running
counter to the whims and absurd prejudices of the gentleman who was then Com-
missioner of Agriculture. This statemeut is made in simple justice to the author of
the report.
62
office rooms were needed in the department building than its cramped
quarters afforded, and in time the space in the splendid museum hall was
encroached upon. The collections thus displaced were removed to the
exposition building referred to above, though some, as the fibers and
birds and a few of the more valuable economic collections, were trans-
ferred to the National Museum, where they are carefully preserved,
though as yet not placed on exhibition. As to the remaining portion
of the “Glover Museum,” it is pretty nearly as is was left ten years ago,
save that many of the collections of specimens have suffered from want
of care and attention, and that the museum hall is now given over to
other uses, for the specimens, those that were worth further preserva-
tion, were transferred to the exhibition building mentioned during the
winter just passed.
To conclude: The scheme of the museum, as contemplated by Mr.
Glover, was original and unique, however some of its special features
may have been suggested by European museums, and it is to be regretted
that it could not have been perpetuated and preserved in the original
space expressly designed for its accommodation, and where its founder .
and father labored for its establishment and watched so long its growth
and development.
And what more remains to be said? The influence of such a man as
Mr. Glover is shown to have been has made itself felt, though the ul-
timate outcome of his schemes for the diffusion of knowledge among
his fellow men did not reach the perfect realization that he had dreamed.
‘‘T confess I have no idea how one man had the power alone to accom-
plish so much work in such a superior manner,” Prof. Hagen once
wrote of him. He could not have accomplished more, for he did that
which his hands found to do with all his might while his strength
lasted, and then he rested from his labors.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Mr. Glover’s entomological writings are confined almost exclusively to
his reports published in the Annuals of the Patent Office, and the United
States Department of Agriculture, and the few published works which
bearhis name. Hisearliest writings, as far as [have been able to discover,
date back to the fall of 1853, and, with one exception, relate to pomo-
logical subjects rather than to entomology. He wrote occasionally for
the Fishkill Standard, usually in a satirical vein, hoiding up to ridi-
cule some local abuse, though not, as far as I know, upon entomological
subjects. It is also surmised that he wrote a series of articles for The
States, published in Washington before the war, in which the short-
comings of a public official were pointedly reviewed. If there were
scientific articles written at this period of his life other than his Patent
Office reports, with a single exception, I do not know of them, and his
personal scrap-book does not reveal them. It is a known fact that he
could not be induced to contribute to current literature during the pe-
riod of his labors in the Department of Agriculture, though he was fre-
quently urged to do so.*
Throwing out, therefore, all titles which are known to represent mere
republications from his reports, the record is reduced to the following
titles, which, as far as I have been able to learn, are the published arti-
cles, works, or writings of Townend Glover.
1. “Popular Fallacies.” American Agriculturist, November 9,1853. Signed “G.”
A short article on the many impracticable insect remedies which go the rounds of the
agricultural press. year after year, unproven and unchallenged.
Nore.—At the same period, and in the same jour-
nal, the following general articles were published over
the same initial: Planting Shade Trees along High-
ways and Railroads, Nov. 23, 1853; Pomological Dream,
Nov. 30, 1853 ; and Pomological Realities (on pear cult-
ure), Dec. 23, 1853.
2. Insects Injurious and Beneficial to Agriculture. Report of the Commissioner
of Patents for 1854. Agriculture. p. 59-89. Illust. by six plates engraved on
stone by the author.
A paper on insects injurious to the cotton plant, wheat, and the grape-vine ; and on the
plum curculo, codling-moth, and peach-borer, closing with a shortaccount of some of
the common species of beneficial insects.
~ *T find in one of his scrap-books a lengthy communication, clipped from some
newspaper unknown to me, which must have been a published official reply to some
correspondent of the Department. It is omitted from the bibliography.—C. R. D.
63
64
3. Report on Insects. Report of the Commissioner of Patents for 1855. Agricult-
ure. p. 64-119. With 48 wood-cut illustrations, from drawings by the author.
A report on insects frequenting the cotton plant; insects upon the stalk, leaf, terminal
shoots, flower, boll, and rotted bolls; insects found in the cotton fields not injurious to
the crop, and insects beneficial to cotton. Also contains a report on insects injurious
and beneficial to the orange tree—the orange scale.
4. Paper upon Entomology. Read before the meeting of the United States Agricult-
ural Society. Dated Jan. 11, 1856. National Intelligencer. Date of publica-
tion cannot be given. (Republished in Fishkill Standard.)
5. On Destroying Injurious Insects. American Agriculturist, Oct., 1856. Vol. 15.
p. 304.
6. Reports on Orange and Cotton Insects. Report of the Commissioner of Patents
for 1858. Agriculture. p. 256-272. .
Report on insscts frequenting the orange trees of Florida, including remarks on the orange
tree by D. J. B. (Browne). Also contains report on insects injurious to the cotton
plant in Florida. Notes on cut-worms and the cotton-stainer.
7. The Hang-Worm. Report of the Commissioner of Patents for1859. Agriculture.
p. 551-554. 1 Figure.
An answer to a correspondent of the U.S. Patent Office, giving the history of ‘‘ Oiketicus,”
(Thyridopteryx ephemerceformis).
8. Report of the Entomologist. Annual Report of the (U. S.) Commissioner of Ag-
riculture for 1862. p. 561-579.
Contains notice of the establishment of the Agricultural Museum, and article on the habits
of the principal species of Coleoptera injurious to agriculture.
9. Report of the Entomologist. Annual Report of the (U. S.) Commissioner of
Agriculture for 1864. p. 540-564.
A short report on the Museum, followed by a description of the habits of principal in-
jurious species of Orthoptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Heteroptora,
Homoptera, and Diptera.
10. Report of the Entomologist. Annual Report of the (U. 8.) Commissioner of
Agriculture for 1865. p. 33-45.
A report on the progress of the Museum, followed by a brief synopsis of habits of birds
examined and placed in the Department since the last report.
11. Entomological Exhibition in Paris. Annual Report of the Commissioner of
Agriculture for 1865. p. 88-102.
Treats of entomology on pages 88-94, 101-102; the rest is on agricultural museums, botan-
ical gardens, the gardens of acclimation in Paris, and the collection of the Zoological
Society of London. Habits of European injurious insects compared with those of re-
lated American insects; habits of European. beneficial insects; silk culture noticed;
grand gold medal awarded to Glover for his work on entomology.
12. Report of the Entomologist. Annual Report of the (U. 8.) Commissioner of
Agriculture for 1866. p. 27-45.
I. Contains brief statements regarding the insects which have been reported on by the
division for the year. II. Contains an economic paper on insects and their uses—
chiefly relating to the products of insects, as honey, wax, cochineal, etc.
13. Injurious to Cotton Plants. Monthly Reports (U. S.) Department of Agricult-
ure for 1866.
A series of articles on the most injurious of the cotton insects, as follows (illustrated) :
No. 1. June. p. 239-241.
No. 2. July. p. 282-285.
3. Sept. p. 831-335.
No. 4. Oct. p. 377-378.
No. 5. Nov. and Dee. p. 421-424.
14. The same. In Monthly Report for 1467. No. 6 of the series, January, 1867.
p. 21-23.
65
15. Report of the Entomologist. Annual Report of the (U.S.) Commissioner of
Agriculture for 1867. (p. 53-76.) 16 illustrations.
A report on the insects most injurious to agriculture during the year, that had been re-
ceived by the Entomological Division.
16. The Potato Beetle. Monthly Report Department of Agriculture for January,
1868. p. 22.
17. The Food and Habits of Beetles. Annual Report of the (U. S.) Commissioner
of Agriculture for 1868. p. 78-117; and 114 outline illustrations.
Part I. An article on the food and habits of the more common species of Coleoptera. Part
II. An alphabetical list of the principal animal and vegetable substances either fre-
quented or injured by beetles, with the names of the beetles frequenting them.
18. Report of the Entomologist. Report of the (U. 8S.) Commissioner of Agricult-
ure for 1869. p. 60-64.
A very brief report, relating entirely to the Museum of the Department.
19. Report of the Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Annual Report of
the (U. S.) Commissioner of Agriculture for 1870, p.65-91, 59 illust.
A record of the work of the Entomologist Division for the year, including new facts relat-
ing to injurious insects from other sources.
20. Entomological Record. Monthly report of the Department of Agriculture for
1871. p. 332-335,
Notes on the Colorado beetle, the chinch-bug, ravages of grasshoppers, thrips, etc.—[These
notes, together with the records published in ensuing monthly reports for several years,
were for the most part embodied in the annual reports of the Department, prepared at
the time of or after their publication in this form.
21. On the Grape-Vine Hopper. Monthly Report for October, 1871. p. 403.
22. Entomological Record. Monthly Report for November and December, 1871.
p. 477.
On twig-girdlers, strawberry insects, cte.
23. Report of the Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Annual Report of
the (U. 8.) Commissioner of Agriculture for 1871. p. 69-88. 23 illust.
A record of the principal insects reported on by the Department during the year.
24. Destructive Grasshoppers in California. Monthiy Report of the Department
of Agriculture for January, 1872. p. 22.
25. The Utah Cricket. Monthly Report, February, 1872. p. 74.
26. The Cabbage Moth. Idem. March and April, 1872. p. 137.
27. A New Grasshopper. Idem. May and June, 1872. p. 215.
28. Entomological Record. Idem. July, 1872. p. 304-307.
29. Entomological Record. Idem. August and September, 1872. p. 366-369.
On peach-tree insects, and misc. insect injuries.
30. Entomological Record. Idem. October, 1872. p. 438-439.
On the army or ‘‘snake-worm ” insect injuries.
31. Entomological Record. Idem. November and December, 1872. p. 497-499.
On a large grasshopper and insect injuries.
32. Report of the Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Annual Report
Commissioner of Agriculture for 1872, p. 112 138. 26 illustrations.
I. Report on the entomological work of the division for the year, with brief history and
habits of the insects recorded. II. A paper entitled ‘‘ Notes ov the Diptera, with the
principal remedies in use for injurious insects in this order.”
14162—Bull 18——5
66
33. Illustrations | of | North American Entomo-ogy. | (United States and Can-
ada)—by Townend Glover, Washington, D. C. | Orthoptera. | Washington,
D.C. | 1872. Large quarto; text, 1l pp. 13 plates with names,
This work, the only one printed from type, contains: An introduction, arrangement of
families, notes on food and habits of orthoptera, parasites, list of substances injured
by orthoptera, lists of genera and species figured, list of desiderata and errata. 250
copies printed; 50 distributed gratuitously, the remainder of the edition having been
destroyed.
34. A Vindication of the Entomological Division of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Private print, 1872. p. 6.
Published in reply to statements made in ‘‘The Department of Agriculture, its History
and Objects,’ a pamphlet issued, 1872, by the chief clerk of the Department. Gra-
tuitously distributed.
35. Entomological Record. Monthly Report of the Department of Agriculture, for
1873. p. 29-31.
Notes on the apple-twig borer, the rose bug, plum insects, and other insect injuries.
36. The Tobacco-worm. Idem. April, 1873. p. 164.
37. Entomological Hecord. Idem. May and June, 1873. p. 237-238. Notes on the
apple-twig borer and Colorado beetle.
38. Entomological Record. Idem. July, 1873. p. 345-347. Notes on corn in-
sects, the grape-vine root louse, trap-door spider, Colorado beetle, luminous
larvee, ete.
39. Entomological Record. Idem. August and September, 1873. p. 426-427. On
Paris green, the Phylloxera, ete.
40. Entomological Record. Idem. October, 1873. p. 496-497. Notes on grape-
vine borers and insect injuries.
41. Entomological Record. Idem. November and December, 1873. p. 571-578.
Notes on the phyloxera, the Colorado potato beetle, protection against cotton
moths, Xyloryctes satyrus, and insect injuries.
42. Report of Rntomologist and Curatorofthe Museum. Report of the U.S. Com-
missioner of Agriculture for 1873, p. 152, 169. 10 illust. -
A brief report on the injurious species of insocts reported during the year with conclu-
sions, etc., relative to the use of Paris green and other poisons in combating cotton
insects.
43. Entomological Record. Monthly report of the U. 8. Department of Agricult-
ure, for 1874. p. 43-45.
Notes on the Phylloxera, Paris green, the cotton caterpillar, &c.
44. Entomological Record. Idem. April and May, 1874. p. 221-222. On luminous
beetles, and poke-root as an insecticide.
45. Entomological Record. Idem. July, 1874. p. 324-330. On Colorado petato
beetle, and notes on insect injuries.
46. Entomological Record. Idem. August and September, 1874. p. 373-376.
Notes on insect injuries.
47. Entomological Record. Idem. October, 1874. pp. 428-431. Experiments with
Phylloxera, the cotton worm, etc.
48. The Grape-root Gall-louse. Idem. November and December, 1874. p. 506-7,
49. Report of Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Report of the United
States Commissioner of Agriculture for 1874. p. 122-146. 20 illust.
Parr I. A brief report on the Colorado potato beetle and other insects, giving the new
facts of the year. Par? II. An economic paper on the Orthoptera.
50.
58.
59.
60.
67
Manuscript Notes from my Journal | or | Illustrations of Insects | Native
and Foreign | Diptera | or | Two-winged Flies. | Washington, 1874.
Written by Townend Glover. Transferred and printed from stone by Jas. F. Gedney,
4to. pg. III, plates I-XII, pl. A (each witha page of explanation) pg. 120, printed only
on one side of the sheet. Only 45 copies printed for gratuitous distribution.)
(a) Introduction, p. I-III. (b) Figures of about 340 imagos, 160 young, 30 habitations, and
numerous details of about 400 species, pl. I-XII. (v) Anatomical details of 86 genera
pl. A. (d) Arrangement of families, p. I. (e) Alphabetical list of the families and gen-
era of Diptera mentioned in this work, with synonyms, habitat, food, etc., p. 2-59,
(f) Alphabetical list of predaceous or parasitic Diptera, the larve or perfect flies of
which destroy other insects, p. 60-62. (g) Alphabetical list of vegetable and animal
substances, etc., inhabited, injured, or destroyed by Diptera, p. 63-78. (h) Alphabeti-
cal list of insects of other orders either destroyinz Diptera or destroyed by them, p,
79-85. (i) Alphabetical list of names of authors, and of authorities quoted, p. 86-89,
(j) Abbreviations used in this work, p. 90. (k) Alphabetical list of some of the gen-
era, ete., of Diptera, with derivation of names, p. 91-93. (1) Alphabetical list of the
species of Diptera, and other orders, fungi, ete., with derivation of names, p 94-100
(m) Supplement. 1. Remedies, p. 101-111. (n) Alphabetical list of insects, etc., men.
tioned in Report on Remedies, p. 112. (0) Synoptical tables (of divisions and families),
p. 113-118. (p) Definition of terms, p. 118. (q) Addenda, p. 119-120. (r) Notes, p,
120.
. Recent notes on the Phylloxera, from Foreign Sources. Monthly Report U.
S. Department of Agriculture for January, 1875. p. 40.
. On Beneficial Insects. Idem. April, 1875. p. 175-6.
. Entomological Record. Idem. May and June, 1875. pp. 221-230. On cut-
worms; Phylloxera in Austria, the same in France; locusts, etc.
. Insect Injuries. Idem. July, 1875. p. 307-310.
. Insect Injuries. Idem. August and September, 1875. p. 367-370.
Entomological Record. Idem. October, 1875. pp. 442-445. Notes on the
chineh-bug and Colorado beetle.
. Report ofthe Entomologist and Curator ofthe Museum. Report of the (U.S.)
Commissioner of Agriculture for 1875. pp. 114-136. 63 illust.
Part I. An Economic paper on the ‘‘ Heteroptera or Plant Bugs.’”” Parr II. Remedies
reported to ve serviceablo in destroying insects in the Suborder Heteroptera or plant
bugs.
Insect Injuries. Monthly Report of the U. S. Department of Agriculture,
1876. p. 245.
Insect Injuries. Idem. August and September, 1876. p. 333-336,
Manuscript Notes from My Journal | or | Illustrations of Insects | Native and
Foreign | Order Hemiptera | suborder Heteroptera | or plant-bugs. | Washing-
ton, D. C. | 1876.
Written and etched by Townend Glover; transferred and printed from stone by J. C. Ent-
wisle, 1876. (2)+2+410—133 p. (p. 1-57bis, p. 58-132), 10 pl. (pl. 1-9 colored), printed
only on one side of the sheet. (Only 53 copies printed, for gratuitous distribution.)
Title; copyright. . (4) Introduction, p.1-2. (b) About 325 figures of about 257 imagos,
19 young and numerous anotomical details of about 240 species, pi. 1-10, each pl. with
ap. of explanatory text. (c) Arrangement of families, etc., of the Heteroptera, or
plant-bugs (Burmeister’s arrangement (1835), p. 1-6, p. 16; Westwood’s (1840), p. 7-9,
p. 16; Amyot and Serville’s (1843), p. 9-12, p.16; Douglas and Scott’s (1861-1865), p.
12-15, p. 17), p. 1-17. (d) Alphabetical list of the families and genera of Heteroptera
mentioned in this work with synonyms, habits, food, habitat, etc. (includes, with others,
all the species mentioned in Say’s works, with the names of the genera to which they
have more recently been removed), p. 18-73. (e) Alphabetical list of predaceous or
parasitic Heteroptera, the larve, pupx, or perfectinsects of which destroy other in.
sects, p. 74,75. (f) Alphabetical list of vegetable and animal substances frequented,
injured, or destroyed by Heteroptera, p. 76-85. (g) Alphabetical list of insects of other
68
orders either destroying Heteroptera or destroyed by them, p. 86, 87. (h) Alphabetical
list of the names of the authors and of authorities or societies, etc., referred to in this
work, p. 88-91. (i) Abbreviations, etc., used in this work (with a diagram of three
French inches divided into lines), p. 92. (j) Remedies reported to be serviceable in
destroying insects of the suborder Heteroptera or plant-bugs, p. 93-96. (k) Alphabet-
ical list of (some principal) sections, families, and genera of the Hemiptera, Heterop-
tera, with derivation of names, etc.. etc. (compiled from the works of various authors,
omitting many synonyms, and referring the genera to the families of Amyot and Ser-
ville’s classification}, p. 97,112. (l) Alphabetical list of species, of the Hemiptera,
Heteroptera (with translation of the names and referring the synonyms to their proper
genera), p. 112-118. (m) Genera as arranged in the entomological cabinet of the Mu-
seum of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1876 (with reference to
the pages on which the genera are mentioned in Amyot & Serville’s Histoire naturelle
des Hemipteres, Paris, 1843), p. 119-123. (mn) Extracts from the list of Hemiptera, of 5
the region west of the Mississippi, including those collected by the Hayden explora-
tions of 1873, by P. R. Uhler, Baltimore, Md., Washington, D. C., January 1876 (giv-
ing Uhler’s arrangement of the ‘‘ families, &c.,”’ and referring to the pages on which
the genera are mentioned in that work, (see Rec. No. 568), p. 124-137. (0) Notes of the
habits of the Heteropterous insects, with the latest changes in the nomenclature, po-
sition, and classification of the various families, subfamilies, genera, and species
(taken from Uhler’s List (see Rec. No. 568), and referring to the pages of that list), p.
128-131. (p) Errata and addenda, p. 132. (q) List of (4%) societies and individuals to
whom a copy of this work has been sent (1876), p. 132.
61. Report of the Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Report of the
U. 8. Commissioner of Agriculture for 1876. pp. 17-46. Illust., p. 59.
I, Contains report of Chas. R. Dodge on the Museum exhibit at the Centennial Exhibition.
II. Economic paper by the Entomologist on the Homoptera,
62. Report of the Entomologist and Curator of the Museum. Report of the
Commissioner of Agriculture for 1877, pp. 89-148, Plates V, Figs. 100, ‘repro-
duced from the authors’ engravings of Hymevoptera.
I. Economic paper on the Hymenoptera in relation to American Agriculture; II. A re-
port on the Museum Division, with a systematic classitication for economic museums,
prepared by Charles R. Dodge.
63. Manuscript Notes from my Journal | or | Entomological Index | tonames, &c., |
in | Agricultural Reports | with list of | Vegetable and Animal Substances In-
jured or Destroyed by Insects | Washington, D.C., | 1877. 103 pages, quarto.
Written and etched by Townend Glover, and printed on stone.
50 copies were printed for gratuitous distribution.
64. Illustrations | of | North American | Entomology | in the orders of | Coleoptera,
Orthoptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Lepedoptera | Homoptera and Dip-
tera | By Townend Glover | Washington, D.C. | 1878.
The entire set of 273 plates, with names of species on each plate in every order but Lepe-
doptera. Contains, also, arrangement of families, compiled from various authors, in
each order, with alphabetical lists of families and alphabetical lists of species, with
references to plate and figure Twelve copies only were printed for gratuitous dis-
tribution, chiefly to institutions in this country and in Europe. The series also con-
tained the 22 plates of cotton insects though not so stated on the title page. This was
Mr. Glover’s last work, issued only a short time before he was forced to cease his
labors and to end his active connection with the Department of Agriculture.
)
PLATE I.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, Bulletin 18.
A REPRODUCTION OF AN EARLY PLATE ON STONE.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. |
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 19.
AN ENUMERATION ©
PUBLISH HD
OF THE
SYNOPSES, CATALOGUES, AND LISTs
NORTH AMERICAN INSECTS;
TOGETHER WITH OTHER INFORMATION INTENDED TO ASSIST THE
STUDENT OF AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGY.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFIOE.
1888.
22310—Bull 19
o> WP ePakTVMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 19.
AN HNUMERATION
OF THE
bea i Sa: Wa) Bice pl a Ul aD,
SYNOPSES, CATALOGUES, AND LISTS
NORTH AMERICAN INSECTS;
TOGETHER WITH OTHER INFORMATION INTENDED TO ASSIST THE
STUDENT OF AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGY.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1888.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., May 15, 1888.
Str: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 19 of
this Division, being an enumeration of the published synopses, cata-
logues, and lists of North American insects; together with other infor-
mation to assist the student of American Entomology.
Respectfully,
Cl Y. RILEY.
Entomologist.
Hon. NORMAN J. CoLMAN,
Commissioner of Agriculture.
phe Mae
ic ye
x4
tw
Li
i
|
iy
V{y
{)
J
VN
ay)
‘
‘
(a
DPABLE OF CONTENTS.
JTMIROCING WI hae Gy aaeAa ra Seso Bece au Gete a6. Sabtooe SobGH BSSo earn ae Aone
Comprehensive Works on North Age cae incerta Wodse cascades soap GeescoMeor
Systematic Works on single Orders of Insects :
Hymenoptera —----5- .=- 200 Sossau sobd00 eookoe JIS OROMESHa0 SSbEG0 asc505 400C
COMEG NRne Gane bea sco Saye poe occe cos oHucoSoeE J odODGOSHOEe ADO Sp etose
Lepidoptera ....-. secboo cn DUGd sqo cab Snenquesas SooceE edo ooo mosaSege Boer
WDaiintemenerr ade tote se setae isy S otccahs Stich Rta a aia Site lalefa, claves Siscals tng, ols mints crane eve Sys serena
[i HINT UCTS Ae ope SBSH OSD PREC BOR EHO E IO eon eee See Renee Ciara ate
Orthoptera ..---. ae miae sleienee sae sia meena sin bem e cea cee nans eoiass ehiamele aimee :
INEMUEOP CER Anaic atsicicin cin cepas. mci ioaticeiet See Ss Se eye toe rami Nae wate ete, Se ormeis le sents
MELO Dae arene ene esas sien ei ere we nia tins oo Me args Decree ae oes eee
PUSINS SeAIRU Ns ote cna a onrayoe tee eye see cee nace aio Sine Gee mates akceerere cai ieia aye
WINVENO) (Obey se 8 Gs Ae AOC Seem em oG een OCIA CCE EIS acc ene Coe enna
AN EXCITING SS SEBS CEO Ce SOB EISCISe OO SEER TE oe ae tet rs Se eRe AEE
MISO EMtoMmological Periodicals Sas-.c cess sn naccicce tecmee Gece ce cemems eee
Minor VW orkson Economic. Entomology, .-.. -- 2... 222. .ce2cce seca scee sae
List of Entomological Works published by the U. 58 anrencieeeal Commission
andiihenw. Sa Department om Acriculturesss. 2: ce-esecieece css foe eisesisecte
How and where to obtain entomological books...........-.. sooo nds pee araasers
a’ 4
— =
eer ik By *
A oo” a,
. aT ae deter
, a3 eB! Rite =F
; oe PRIST AN x tes
bs e
eee fh
-
SYNOPSES, CATALOGUES, AND LISTS OF NORTH
AMERICAN INSECTS.
INTRODUCTION.
Inquiries regarding the works most useful for the determination of
our native insects, as also about the most useful general works of ref-
erence, are among the most coustantly recurring ones received by the
Entomologist; but satisfactory and short replies are in most instances
impossible, for the reason that the information is not contained in a
few comprehensive works, but is scattered through many different peri-
odicals and other publications. A complete list of such works, even of
those pertaining to a single Order of insects, is too long to be given in
an ordinary letter, and to obviate the difficulty experienced in such
correspondence this bulletin has been prepared.
It was not our intention to compile a complete bibliography of the
classification of North American insects, but to give briefly the refer-
ences to such works and papers as are most useful for the identification of
our insects. Thus, we originally planned to give only the titles of mon-
ographs or synopses of families or subfamilies and to reject all papers
which contained disconnected descriptions of new species, or revisions
and synopses of isolated genera. But while preparing the bulletin it
was felt to be advisable to include smaller synoptic papers. For instance,
several large families, e. g., the Scarabieidz among the Coleoptera, have
recently been quite carefully revised, but the literature is in the form
of synopses of single genera which, in their aggregate, form a more or
less complete monograph of the whole family. In this case either these
smaller synopses had to be mentioned in this bulletin or the whole fam-
ily had to be omitted.
On the other hand, many of the monographs here mentioned are an-
tiquated, so as to be of little value at the present time; or they are
monographs comprising the genera and species of all countries, and
difficult for the student of the American fauna to use, from the fact that
the descriptions of the American genera are almost lost amongst the
mass of foreign material.
It were futile to attempt to discriminate in such an enumeration
between the more useful and the more or less useless, but as a rule we
would recommend to the student to consult rather the later than the
7
8
older publications. Unfortunately there are marked exceptions to the
rule; as a few of the latest synoptic and descriptive papers by the
younger authors are most insufficient and unsatisfactory. We have
added a list of the special works on Economic Entomology, and also
of those published by the U. S. Entomological Commission and by the
Department.
There are a good many comprehensive classificatory works on Euro-
pean insects, but the almost complete absence of such works in this
country is a great bar to the progress of entomology and is the inevit-
able outcome of the immense mass of inaterial to be worked up and of
the comparatively small number of workers in monographic entomology,
As will be seen from the contents of this bulletin, the publications of
this kind even in Orders most worked up, as in Coleoptera and Lepidop-
tera, are greatly scattered ; while in the less popular Orders compara-
tively little has been done. Yet with the many earnest workers now in
the field we may hope to see this present want met at no very remote
period, and if the present bulletin should prove of temporary service it
will not have been prepared in vain, though intended chiefly to relieve
the Division of a great deal of letter-writing.
The preparation of the titles was originally placed in charge of Mr.
B. Pickman Mann, but was in such shape when he left the office as to
require almost entire rewriting. This has been mainly done by Mr. E.
A. Schwarz, though other members of the Divisional force have assisted.
C. V. RB.
PUBLISHED SYNOPSES, CATALOGUES, AND LISTS OF NORTH
AMERICAN INSECTS.
COMPREHENSIVE WORKS MOST USEFUL FOR THE STUDY OF
NORTH AMERICAN INSECTS.
H. C. C. BuRMEISTER.—Handbuch der Entomologie. Berlin, 1832-55.
5 vols. Vol. I. Allgemeine Entomologie.
The first volume treats of general entomology; Vol. II, part 1, of the Hemip-
tera; part 2, of Orthoptera; the remaining volumes of Coleoptera.
The first volume has been translated by W. E. Shuckard, under the title:
Manual of Entomology. 1 vol. London, 1836.
J. O. WEstWwoop.—An introduction to the modern classification of in-
sects, founded on the natural habits and corresponding organiza-
tion of the ditferent families. 2 vols. London, 1839-40.
THomas Say.—Complete writings on the Entomology of North America ;
edited by John L, Le Conte. New York, 1859.
H. A. Hacen.—Bibliotheca Entomologica. Die Litteratur iiber das
ganze Gebiet der Entomologie bis zum Jahre 1862. Leipzig, 1862.
A. S. PackAaRb.—Guide to the study of insects. Henry Holt & Co.,
Philadelphia and New York. Many editions. (First edition, Sa-
lem, 1869.)
THE STANDARD NATURAL History. Edited by John Sterling Kings-
ley. Boston, S. E. Cassino & Co., 1884-’35.
Volume II contains the insects, which are treated by the following anthors :
Hymenoptera, J. H. Comstock and L. O. Howard; Coleoptera, Geo. Dim-
mock; Lepidoptera, H’y Edwards and C. H. Fernald; Diptera, 8S. W. Wil-
liston; Orthoptera, ©. V. Riley; Hemiptera, P. R. Uhler; Neuroptera, A.
S. Packard; Arachnida, J. H. Emerton.
3
a &. >
i ae |
ete tae Bd: Soa >;
aa
Sy Bt ite
' ary
aro ee beget
HYMENOPTERA.
I.—CATALOG UES.
E. T. CRESSon.—Catalogue of the described species of North American
Hymenoptera. hal ,
rae ap
A
ALS dre!
a | 2 :
;
oe
Y hd wr
rol lg
A
PL)
LEPIDOPTERA.
[.—CATALOGUES AND LISTS.
J. G. MorRISs.—Catalogue of the described Lepidoptera of North Amer-
ica. Washington, Smithsonian Institution, 1860.
This is the first catalogue of the North American Lepidoptera, but now greatly
antiquated and superseded.
J. W. WEIDEMEYER.— Catalogue of North American Butterflies.
Canad. Entom., Vol. XV, 1883, p. 69-72.
BOMBYLIIDZE.
©. R. OSTEN SACKEN.—Western Diptera, ete. 8o9 by 72549 inch.
At first these cysts have no epidermis, but a thin coating appears
and thickens as they approach the normal size of 7,355 inch in length
and +55 inch in width. (Plate XX, D, 2.)
During the life of the female the cysts form rapidly, until the whole
uterus becomes enormously enlarged, and contains cysts in every stage,
from the primary agglomeration of cells to free Anguillule. (Plates
XIX and XVIII.)
The decay of the environing root exposes the pregnant female to
changes in weather, and with a slight increase in heat the contraction
of the exterior expels the contents of the uterus and disperses them.
This in most cases appears to be through the upper segment, though
often it occurs through the fissure in the head. (Plate XIX.)
The cyst at first is a solid mass of granular cells. (Plates IX, 1, and
X,1.) It divides centrally at the shorter axis (Plates IX, 2, 3; X, 2,
26,4); each half repeats this process till four or five segments are visible:
A longitudinal fissure then appears, causing eight segments (Plates
25
IX, 6,7; and X, 15, 16,18); the walls of the segments are absorbed
each side the central long fissure (Plate IX, 8, 10, 15, 16,17, 18), which
extends to the margin of the cyst in one direction, and upon separation
at that end motion begins, and the Anguillula awakes to life and ae-
tion. (Plates IX, 17, 18; and XI, 1.)
sale eruwth within the cyst continues till the worm attains a length
of ;43$5 inch or more, and a central diameter of 5355 inch; the cyst
ruptures, the worm is free (Plate XI, 2, 3, 7), leaving the ae shell
shrunken and torn. (Plate XI, 4, 4a.)
Up to this point I have failed to discriminate the sexes. Both ue
blunt at one end, which is marked with a fissure ;5¢55 inch to 75855
inch in length, often with a circular hinge-like termination (Plate XII,
eG da, Ga, Ta, and XIII, la, 2a, 3a) extending into a tortuous channel
tosvoo inch in diameter and averaging >;%> inch in length; then the
remainder of the worm becomes a mass Of cells of various sizes to within
7s inch or 7205 Ich of the extremity or tail.
These cells at times appear with a sinuous channel clear from either
end (Plate XI, 4), or with breaks in their continuity (Plate XI, 2, 3), 0
granular masses interspersed (Plates XII, 6,7, and XIV, 1,2), or as
fine cells irregnlarly arranged. (Plate XIII, 1, 2,3.) Occasionally the
whole interior appears as a solid mass of cells. (Plate XII, 6.)
I have not discovered the method of impregnation, but at an early
period rapid changes in shape begin in the female. (Plates XVI, 2 to
15; XVII,1 to9; XIV; XV; and XII, 5,6, 7,8.) The enlargement is
preceded by the formation in both upper and lower thirds of the body
of dark masses of cells that eventually unite (Plates XIV, 3, A, B; 4,
5, A, B, OC, and 6; XV, 2,3), then by the time the worm reaches the
age represented in Plate XVI, 11, 12; Plate X VI, 3,4, become changed
into a bicornate ovarium or uteras, which at full term attains the length
of 2'%> Inch in many coils, and contains one hundred and fifty or one
hundred and sixty full-sized cysts.
The shapes and sizes of these pregnant females vary greatly, and I
believe are the result of the environment. In soft tissues of the Cow-
pea, Radish, and the like rapidly-growing plants they attain a transverse
diameter of 3605 inch, and a length of ;3$°, inch. The tail is reduced
to a short spine (Plates XTV, 3; and XV, 2, 3), which disappears later
on, as the worm approaches the transverse diameter of ;35°, inch.
(Plate XVII, 3, 4.)
The thickness of the exterior wall varies from 5255 inch at the
lower part of the body to ;5}o5 inch at the vertex, and is exceedingly
tough and resistant. In color it appears yellowish by transmitted light,
but a brilliant white by reflected light. When fully developed, it is
partly transparent, showing the coils of the uterus with its eysts. The
exterior is granular or corrugated, especially near the “head” (Plates
XIV, 6,and XTX), and with an apparently radiate arrangement of cells
from acenter near the tail, er perhaps marking the disappearance of
that appendage. (Plate X XI.)
» 26
The head varies from a form like Plates XVII, 3, 4, 7,9, and XVI, 9,
12, 13, 14, to that shown by Plates XVI, 10, 11,.15; XVII, 2, 5,°8,-and
XVIII, the neck from a mere contraction of the body, Plates X VII, 6,
and XVI, 15, to a long tube, as in Plates XVI, 14, and XVII, 9.
The body varies from almost a globe (Plate XVI, 9,13) to an oval
(Plate XVI, 14; XVII, 9), or nearly a cylinder. (Plate XVI, 15.)
The worms found in woody tissue are usually of the forms of Plates
XVI, 10, 11, and XVII, 5, 8; in soft tissues like Plates XVI, 14, and
XVII, 7, 9, but Iam unable to understand the reason of this variation,
In roots, as a rule, the bodies radiate from the central axis of the
root, with the ‘‘ heads” to the axis.
When once enlargement of the body begins, the worm becomes a fix-
ture, and remains incapable of progression in any direction; the en-
largement is gradual and the cells of the root tissues become smaller
by the pressure, forming a rigid wall on every side of the worm.
How long the worm exists is an unsolved problem which I hope to
solve in time.
Apart from vegetable tissues, J have noted signs of life in the An-
guillula after being kept air-dry six months, but have no record of any
reliable experiments with the worms in the roots; but the vitality is
very great.
When motion is first perceived in the cyst, the worm is an average
of ;34°, inch in length and ;5355 extreme thickness ; soon after it be-
comes free it enlarges and lengthens till it casts its skin, which it does
as Shown in Plate XI, 5, leaving the old skin shrunken as at 6, same
plate; a fragmentary cast is seen on Plate XII, 1, but I have not de-
termined the number of times in its life it sheds the skin, as it is rare
to find a perfect cast for measurement.
Among the thousandsof Anguiilule I have examined, therearea great
many variations and arrangements of cells that are not easily explainable.
Plates XV, XIII, and XII, 5, 8, 7, 6, exemplify some of the most marked.
Plate XIII, 2, 3, is very singular; a cyst-like form, with segments.
Also at 3, a peculiar arrangement of cells, large and small; in fact, I
have never found two worms exactly similar in the grouping of cells;
the resemblance is general, but with wide variation of details. The ex-
amples given in the plates justify this conclusion, sketched as they were
from living specimens.
The arrangement of the cysts in the uterus is generally as shown by
Plates XVIII, XTX, and XX, though that often becomes changed, as
indicated in Plate X XI. (Note 13.)
In mature and apparently aged worms, I have found as many as a
dozen free worms within the uterus, having attained motion and liber-
ation there.
In plates showing the changes in vegetable tissues, ‘“A” refers to the
enlargements and nests of Anguillula, “‘B” to spots of decay.
27
NOTES.
NoTE 1.—Owing to a lack of literature on the subject, I have provisionally named
this worm Anguillula arenaria, but it may belong to a different genus. If an Anguil-
lula, it is very near the A. brevispinosus, but as the spine disappears in mature forms,
I have called this A. arenaria.
Notr 2.—This information came from one of the oldest citizens, who learned of it
from the Spanish residents in 1820.
Notr 3.—Letters received from correspondents at nearly every important town gave
the data.
Notr 4.--Messrs. Berckmans, Onderdonk, Munson, and Stelle are referred to.
Notre 5.—I kept fully developed pregnant females ina watch glass dry for six months,
and when wet, they expanded, and the grown worms within the cysts in the uterus
resumed motion.
Note 6.—The average weight of acubic foot of ordinary sandy surtace soil is 6,602,625
grains, equal to 86.08 pounds ayoirdupois; this at the temperature of 70°, the soil
being air-dry.
Nore 7.—The quantity required to saturate a cubic foot was 2.3 gallons of the kero-
sene emulsion.
Note 8.—The amount of lime used was 20 pounds to the tree, forty-nine trees to the
acre.
Notre 9.—Water poured upon the pots percolated through the soil and out at the
hole in the bottom of the pot. This was allowed to evaporate considerably and exain-
ined with magnifier 350 diameters, eye-piece B, objective one-half inch.
Notre 10.—Radishes and turnips are very susceptible to the Anguillula. (See Plate
III, drawn from actual specimen, natural size. )
Note 11.—A common practice among the ‘‘ old-time ” slaves, who tell me it was the
rule made by the old whites as far back as 1805. The reason they gave was ‘the
peach loves clay and yellow sand.”
NoTE 12.—I could only approximate the growth and development by the use of such
plants as the Cow-pea and Radish—planting seed in infected soil, and at certain dates
pulling up the plants and examining the knots, making a careful sketch, drawn to
scale, each time. Allattempts at cultivating in fluids failed.
Note 13.—By softening the exterior with a solution of caustic potash, snipping off
the head and gently pressing the body in fluid, with a cover glass, the uterus exuded
as shown in Plate XIX.
e)
EXPLANATIONS TO PLATES.
PLATE I.
Roots of Cow Pea, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula: A, enlargement
and nests: B, spots of decay. (Original.)
PLATE II.
Roots of Okra, showing enlargements caused by AnguilluJa: A, enlargements and
nests; B, spots of decay. (Original.)
PLATE III.
Roots of Radish, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula: A, enlargements and
nests; B, spots of decay. (Original.)
PLATE IV.
Roots of Grape [Black Hamburg], showing enlargements caused by Anguillula: A,
enlargements and nests; B,spots of decay. (Original.)
PLATE V.
Roots of Peach, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula. (Original.)
PLATE VI.
Roots of Weeping Willow, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula—natural
size. (Original.)
PLATE VII.
Roots of Fig, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula—natural size. (Orig-
inal.)
PLATE VIII.
1, section of root of Okra, showing enlargements caused by Anguillula; 2, Peach,
same; 3, Grape, same—enlarged four times: 4, Weeping Willow, same—natural size:
A, enlargements and nests; B,spots of decay. (Original.)
PLATE IX.
Reproductive cysts which form in the uterus of the female Anguillula: 1, first
stage, solid mass of granular cells; 2,3,segmentation or division into two parts; 4,
26, 5, 5a, 6, segmentation into four parts; 7, longitudinal fissure appearing, which
causes segmentation into eight parts; 8,9, 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, walls of seg-
ments absorbing each side of the central longitudinal fissure which extends to the
margin of the cyst in one direction, until upon separation at that end motion begins—
greatly enlarged. (Original.)
29
30
PLATE X.
Reproductive cysts (continued) : 1, 1a, first Stage; 2,3, 4, 26, bi-segmentation or di-
vision into two parts; 5, 6,7,8,9, segmentation into four parts; 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 17, 18, segmentation into eight parts—greatly enlarged. (Original, )
1B
LATE XI.
Developed or free Anguillule within the reproductive cysts: 1, free Anguillula
Within cyst not yet broken; 2, 3,7, cyst broken; 4, 4a, empty shell of eyst from which
Anguillule have emerged; 5, young worm casting skin; 6,empty skin cast by young
worm—-greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XII.
Growth of Anguillule: 1, cast skin
bluutness at one end, with fissure hay
of young worm; 2,3, 4,5, 6,7, 8, worms showing
ing a circular, hinge like termination at A, and
granular masses of cells within—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XIII.
Growth of Anguillulse (continued): 1, 2,3, worms showing masses of fine cells irrecu-
larly arranged within, and fissure at blunt end with circular, hinge-like termination
at A—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XIV.
Growth of Anguillule and changes
within the female: 1, 2, female worms showing
granular masses within; 3,4, 5,6, changes in shape in the female, preceded by for-
mation in upper and lower thirds of body of dark masses of cells, A, B, C, which
eventually unite—greatly enlarged.
(Original. )
PLATE XV.
Changes within female Anguillule
(continned): 1, 2, 3, enlargements in shape of
the female, with formation of masses of cells at A—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XVI.
Changes in form of female Anguillule: 1-15, outlines showing changes in form,
from leaving the reproductive cyst until the female is herself filled with cysts, also
showing changes in the form of the h
larged. (Original.)
ead and disappearance of the tail—greatly en-
PLATE XVII.
Changes in form of female Anguillul
#e (continued): 1-9, outlines of changes in form
of body and head, with the disappearance of the tail—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XVIII.
Gravid female Anguillula, showing
contracted head and neck as in some females,
and the arrangement of cysts in the uterus—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XIX.
Arrangement of cysts in uterus of fe
male Anguillula and expulsion of young worms ;
through fissure in the head—greatly enlarged. (Original.)
or
PLATE XX.
Arrangement of cysts in uterus of female Anguillula (continued): A-B, cysts a»
ranged in bands reaching across to the walls of the uterus; .B-C, aggregation of cells
into irregular masses within the uterus; C-D, aggregations of cells arranged in two
rows in the uterus; D-E, cysts that have attained the normal size and become coated
with a thin epidermis—greatly enlarged. (Original. )
PLATE XXI.
A changed arrangement of cysts within the uterus of the female Anguillula which
often occurs—greatly enlarged. (Original.)
ie
- =
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture,
COW PEA.
PLATE |.
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agricuiture.
PLATE Il.
en ee je
4 j ¢ ip yee
OKRA.
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PLATE Il.
RADISH.
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PLATE IV.
Q
:
h
7
.
GRAPE.
Vitis Vinifera— Black Hamburg.
"ws
po UU se
a p
ae 5
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PLATE V.
PEACH.
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture,
WEEPING WILLOW.
Natural size.
Vl
ie ,
: Mee lif ee
' hs i, Ri ‘i 4
oe! wy i " i i
et
+
ome
‘ a }
re i eu
ha Aa \ J
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PLATE VII.
;
,
FIG.
Natural size.
ud Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
ps
oO
>
\ 3 .
~N fa] y; _
SERRE see Se y i . 3 PR et
6) APE \ Oy I OCH
LiL EM aS a eet
=
VFS IVS
——S
3) Eos oe 72 >
sae 7
any ays
he ee. ese a {ens Pee fs
4 aby Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
q ‘ PLATE X.,
g
CYSTS OF ANGUILLULA.
DEVELOPMENT OF ANGUILLULA.
&
“ten Mn i Sa
ree
it
Dept. Agricu
is
logy,
{ vision of Entomolo
PEATE eure
RS
0 DUS CHT BA
DEVELOPMENT OF ANGUILLULA.
F Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PLATE XIII.
iS if
es" y uo as 2
: ca :
y, Cj é oO ‘ C333
HOT Ki
Menecc cones
Cdawarc sigs
(Yo Wascese (
‘Ss } Dy
SOS
rreyry
RO)
+5 aes
Tp
sens
LAG
ROS?
eh
pee
()
NS Ned
DEVELOPMENT OF ANGUILLULA.
peer
SS RASS PES
ey PSS oes semencegeneeeay © AS
PO ISo5 eux ee. D-
GEA Pee BS
ER EE
RS RS SB aS
=~ Ds
ee OT ars SACO
wh)
DSpi At
- SSS ESB
| ; | i) &®
)
po ys b
TOV OBYY
< An ys 1e .
i s) Aes
4 ee PAI 5. J )) pw * rt
PSE = Ware ey a. re) aie g
10.000.
Sie
‘
PLATE XIV,
e SS pe Sx é
2 age = sis oen ee SS.
2 2 ee =) : :
IP aor SPE
x EE
GROWTH AND CHANGES IN THE FEMALE ANGUILLULA-
a a Ty!
\
eM elere des
AS 5 real
ea bee. AW
OS
Wee tears
)
Oi
ea
tay
e
se
y
Cs
M0
4
J TAQ
fs ae
Ne
Os,
)
“~
she <
BEATE XV
SS Se ee
ES REBIISS
‘
\
\
\
\
We
>< .
PLATE. XVIIL.
—~ Va
»
<—.
\.
:
‘
i}
= 7
:
[4
«
*
az D
‘
;
é
_=”.lUC > ae ae ef an
GRAVID FEMALE ANGUILLULA, SHOWING CYSTS IN UTERO. 3
A s eh
a,
~~
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PAE AIX:
WT et
>
art
Ae
tee s= i
FEMALE ANGUILLULA, SHOWING EXPULSION OF YOUNG.
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
F PLATE Xx.
2
Zip >
; pf aS
. |
153)
ith
bol
ics "
ay
~e
aE
8
4
q
oe oN oe! ie
Bulletin 20, Division of Entomology, Dept. Agriculture.
PA El
al
hoo
10
—— In.
2.500
: ARRANGEMENT OF CYSTS IN FEMALE ANGUILLULA IN UTERO.
Ee )
es
\RTMENT OF AGRICULTUR
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BuLuetin No. 21.
i
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
Hee G6
PP o.eePARI MENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 21.
ReBok Chik: |
, rie toc wet hALIA
|
~~ ENEMIES OF THE FLUTED SCALE.
TO INVESTIGATE THE
th BY
7 ALBERT KOEBELE.
( MADE UNDER DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST. )
9-0 0
WASH ENG EON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE,
18.910",
—-
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., November 22, 1889.
Sir: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 21 of
this Division, being the report of Mr. Albert Koebele upon the Fluted
Scale (Icerya purchast Maskell) and its natural enemies in Australia.
I had intended to incorporate it in my forthcoming annual report, but
the limited space alloted to that report makes it necessary to publish
this as a separate bulletin. .
Respectfully,
C2 NV; GLE,
Entomologist.
Hon. J. M. Rusk,
_ Secretary of Agriculture.
INTRODUCTION.
The following report by Mr. Albert Koebele, one of the California
agents of the Division of Entomology, gives an account of his trip to
Australia, made during the late summer and fall of 1888 and the winter
of 188889, under instructions from this Department, for the purpose
of investigating the Australian natural enemies of the Fluted Scale
(Icerya purchasi Maskell) with a view to introducing the most efficient
of them into California.
Failing to secure a specific appropriation from Congress for this pur-
pose, although assisted in the attempt by the California delegation,
and particularly by the Hon. 0. M. Felton, and failing also to secure
the removal of the clause restricting travel to the limits of the United
States, we were led to accomplish the result through the kindness of
the Department of State, in connection with the Melbourne Exposition,
an arrangement having been made whereby two of the salaried agents
of the Division should be temporarily attached to the Commission,
their expenses, outside the United States, to be defrayed by the Com-
mission, within the sum of $2,000. The warm thanks of this Depart-
ment are due to the Department of State for this codperation, and par-
ticularly to the Hon. Frank McCoppin, commissioner-general to the
Exposition, to whom the matter was submitted by the State Department
for approval. Mr. McCoppin at once accepted the proposition, and
upon Mr. Koebele’s arrival in Australia helped him in every way possi-
ble to make the experiment successful.
Mr. Koebele was sent, as just stated, for the specific purpose of study-
ing and importing the natural enemies of the Fluted Scale, while the
other agent, Mr. F. M. Webster, was sent to make a special report to
the Commission on the agricultural features of the Exposition. Mr.
Webster’s report has been sent to the Commission, and was formally
submitted to Mr. McCoppin. A copy of the present report, although
purely entomological, and having little relation tothe Exposition proper,
has also been transmitted to Mr. McCoppin,,as the results of the mis-
sion are, and ever will be, connected with his exposition work.
-While a number of other entomological matters are referred to in the
report, Mr. Koebele never lost sight of the main object of his mission.
How successful it has proved late reports already published in INSECT
5
6
LIFE, and elsewhere, have abundantly testified. They have more than
justified the anticipations expressed in my last annual report:
We fully expect to learn of the increase and rapid spread of this new in troduction
as well as some of the other predaceous species which have been introduced, and to
find that in a comparatively tew years thie orange groves of southern California will
be kept measurably freed of the pernicious Fluted Scale without so great an effort on
the part of the growers or so great expense in destroying it. That nature will, with
the new conditions induced by these importations, come to the relief of the fruit-
grower, and that this interesting experiment will result in the ultimate saving of
untold millions to the people of the Pacific Coast is our sincere belief which we hope
to see verified. Not that we expect the Icerya to be ever entirely exterminated ;
but it will be kept under subjection so as to be comparatively harmless, as it is in its
native country. :
One of the insects imported, viz, the Cardinal Vedalia (Vedalia cardi-
nalis Mulsant), has multiplied and increased to such an extent as to rid
many of the orange groves from Icerya and to promise immunity in the
near future for the entire State of California. In fact, the rapid multi-
plication and the effective work of this little beetle are almost incom-
prehensible until we come to consider its power of increase in a climate
like that of southern California, where there is scarcely any cessation in
its activities.
A careful account of the transformations of the Vedalia has been pre-
pared by Mr. Coquillett and was published in INsEcT LIFE for Sep-
tember, 1889, pages 70 to 74. I reproduce the figures in connection with
Mr. Koebele’s report in order to familiarize those who have not yet seen
it with its appearance. I have also had some other figures made to ac-
company the report.
The period from the laying of the eggs until the adults again appear
occupies less than thirty days for the Vedalia. At this rate of increase,
calculating that three hundred eggs are laid by each female, and that
one half of these produce females, it will readily be seen that in six
months the offspring of a single female beetle may under favorable cir-
cumstances amount to over twenty-two trillions. So far it has not been
noticed to prey upon any other insect than the Fluted Scale, a fact which
accounts somewhat for its exceptionally rapid work and renders the
outlook extremely encouraging.
Uf the other enemies of the Icerya referred to and more particularly
mentioned in the latter part of Mr. Koebele’s report, none of them have
so far given much promise, and there is risk of their not being colonized
by virtue of the extraordinary spread and increase of the Vedalia,
which has swept away from whole regions the Fluted Scale, upon which
they depend. This contingency should have been avoided and I very
much regret that they have not become established in California, be-
cause their establishment, and especially that of the little Dipteron,
Cryptochetum icerye, wotld have helped in the general subjection of
the pest and would be particularly valuable whenever the Vedalia, for
whatever reason, at any time practically forsakes a given locality.
C. V. R.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
ALAMEDA, CAL., July 17, 1889
Str: i herewith submit my report upon the study of I. erya purchasi in
Australia and New Zealand and the introduction of its parasites and
enemies into California, undertaken under your direction and in ac-
cordance with your letter of instructions. *
Respectfully yours,
ALBERT KOEBELE,
Special Agent.
Prof. V.C. RILEY,
U. S. Entomologist.
*The following is extracted from the letter of instractions:
WASHINGTON, July 3, 1888.
As you are already aware you are sent to Australia for the purpose of mak-
ing an investigation of the parasites and other natural enemies of Icerya purchasi
with a view of introducing them into California, It will he necessary for you to go to
Adelaide to see Mr. Frazer 8, Crawford, who sent over the first Dipterous parasites
and the Celostomas (or rather Monophlebus crawfordi). This Dipterous parasi‘e has
been named by Dr. Willsiton Lestophonus icerye, and at Adelaide you will probably
be able to study this insect carefully. Make the most careful investigations where
you can learn of the occurrence of Jcerya and find all of its natural enemies in Austra-
lia. Find out also the periods at which these parasites oviposit and ascertain the
season at which success in importation will be most likely with each and all of them.
Once on the ground you can see for yourself just what will be necessary to be done in
order to bring about this result. You should also endeavor to place the Department
in correspondence with as many observers as you can interest in the subject, and
should by all means endeavor to get at least one man who will be able to devote some
time to the matter and continue observations after you leave. It is barely possible
that we may be able to re-imburse some such person for the time expended, but for
this I will write you later, if indeed I do not see you personally in Australia in No-
vember. You will, of course, inquire immediately upon arriving in Melbourne concern-
ing the largest orange-growing districts in Australia, and also make inquiries as to the
best places for observing Icerya, aside from Adelaide. If you will visit the Botanic
Gardens in Melbourne you will be able to get some information there. Baron von
Mueller, formerly director of the Botanic Gardens, is still a resident of that city and
you will find him a very well-informed person to consult. I inclose you letters of in-
troduction both to Mr. Crawford and Baron von Mueller. * * *
On this trip your salary will be paid as usual by this Department, but your ex-
penses by the Department of State through Mr. McCoppin. * * *
* * ¥
7
wees 2
mak ai the iets S
a A iy he eae
\
‘ ‘
1
fe 2
i
ri mies } ‘
'
a
ri »
aa "4 4
*
wit aad
' r .
S i ©
‘ a be
jv z A ae 4 4
a ok. ? : one ae |
S eee eke oe Oe z =
* : VERS 6 Sin? ABOE s
“does aos It =
Por
es a ‘¥ ok i
. 4 W
. oa” , =
REPORT OF THE FLUTED SCALE OF THE ORANGE AND ITS
NATURAL ENEMIES IN AUSTRALIA,
By ALBERT KOEBELE.
In accordance with the commission received from the Hon. Norman
J. Colman, United States Commissioner of Agriculture, and your letter
of July 3, 1888, I left San Francisco on August 25, and arrived at Auck-
land, New Zealand, on September 14, where some hours were spentin get-
ting information in regard to Icerya. I visited Mr. W. Will, editor of
the New Zealand Herald and Auckland Weekly News, who then, and
subsequently on my later visit, gave me valuable information in regard
to the occurrence and disappearance of Icerya in the Auckland districts,
as well as many other points of interest in horticulture ; and also Mr. T.
F. Cheeseman, curator of the Auckland Museum, who readily accom-
panied me to a place full of Albizzia (Acacia) lophantha, Bentham, which
had been about three years previously completely covered with Icerya.
I made a careful search for specimens on these trees, yet only four full-
grown females with large egg-sacs could be found. On one of the scales
two rather large mites were feeding, attached to the under side; and the
masses of old and moldy remains of Icerya were still visible on the
trunks of trees.
A residence on which formerly were many orange trees was also vis-
ited. ‘There all of the trees had been cut down on account of the num-
erous scales, and at the time of my visit no Icerya could be found and
none were observed during the year as the proprietors informed me.
No one was able to state the exact reason of the disappearance of the
scales; some disease was the supposed cause.
The steamer left Auckland the following day and arrived in Sydney,
New South Wales, September 20. I remained there for four days in
search of Icerya. On my first walk a number of them were discovered
at the town hall premises, infesting a Pittosporum (P. wndulatum), and
the succeeding days a few more were found in one of the public parks,
also on this Pittosporum. A large isolated acacia tree full of the scales
was found in front of a private house in the eastern part of Sydney;
all were full-grown females with more or less developed egg-saes and ap-
9
10
parently in a healthy condition. As the trees infested were all inclosed,
no proper examination could be made and the few obtained at the town
hall showed no trace of parasites. A trip was also made to Parramatta,
about 14 miles to the west of Sydney, to look into some of the orange
orchards. Ifound nearly all the trees badly infested with the red-scale
(Aspidiotus aurantit Maskell, Fig. 1), and still worse with what I con-
Fig. 1.—Aspidiotus aurantii Maskell: 1, seales on leaf of orange, natural size; la, adult male; 10,
seales of female; le, scale of nale—enlarged (after Comstock).
sidered to be Mytilaspis gloverii Packard.* Indeed, some of tbe trees
are completely covered by this latter scale, having the appearance of
an old coat of whitewash on the bark which had partly fallen off. None
of the several orange-growers there visited had ever seen an Icerya or
was familiar with the insect. I left Sydney on the 24th and arrived in
Melbourne the following day, having in the meantime, through the
kindness of the United States consul, obtained a free pass over the New
South Wales Railway, which courtesy was shown me by all the colonies
subsequently visited. Indeed, I can not speak too highly of the kind-
ness shown me by all the Government officials, and of the interest they
took in the successful execution of my work. I remained in Melbourne
for six days, during which time I visited Baron Ferdinand von Mueller,
to whom you had given me letters of introduction. This gentleman
assured ine that the Icerya never became extensively injurious in Aus-
*A careful study of the pygidial characters of this scale shows it to be much nearer
M. pomorum than M. gloverii. It seems, however, to be distinct from the former and
will probably prove to be new.—C, V. R.
LE
tralia. Occasionally and in certain spots they became numerous, but
always disappeared again. [also met Mr. C. French, Baron von Muel-
ler’s assistant, who has had some experience in entomology. He
claims that the scale has been known to him for thirty-four years,
yet he has never seen it in large numbers.
At the Zoological Gardens I found on a species of Eucalyptus a coe-
cid in such numbers as to cover the under side of all the larger branches
and the stem in part. Many of the winged males were secreted among
the crevices of bark, with their two long white setous hairs protruding.
Numerous larvee of a coleopter were found under chips of bark feeding
upon the scales, apparently belonging to some clerid. I never met
with these larve again in my later researches nor with the coccid men-
tioned. A great variety of scales was observed at Melbourne; the
most pernicious amongst them, a species of Aspidiotus, deserved atten-
tion. This is A. rossi Crawford, figured on his plate 18 of the Coccide,
but as yet no description has appeared to my knowledge. I have seen
olive trees completely covered by this scale; it will attack almost any
kind of tree or shrub as I later observed. Many of the shrubs in the
Botanical Gardens in Melbourne infested by this scale were in a dying
condition. The introduction of this pest would be of serious conse-
quence to the United States and we should be on our guard against
this as well as a second species of waxy scale, probably a species of
Ceroplastes. This last is covered by a thick, smooth, white, waxy mat-
ter which effectually protects it. Nothing would destroy this scale,
except remedies against the newly hatched Jarve, which, before they
exude any wax, are easily killed. The insect was observed all over
eastern Australia, and it was numerous in the Botanical Garden at Syd-
ney and in the woods near Brisbane. At the Botanical Gardens they
could find no remedy except cutting down the infested plants. I recom-
mended a strong resin wash for the newly hatched larve. No Icerya
could be found during my short stay at Melbourne.
I arrived at Adelaide, South Australia, on October 2, with letters of
introduction to Mr. Frazer 8. Crawford, of the surveyor general’s office,
who received me very kindly and promised me his assistance, which
promise he honorably fulfiiled throughout my stay in Adelaide. I saw
‘the man who discovered the parasites of Icerya (Lestophonus icerye),
and, indeed, felt very bappy when he promised to show me a large col.
ony of the scales on the following day. Early the next morning Mr. A.
Molineux, agricultural editor of the South Australian Register and Ade-
laide Observer, and proprietor of the Garden and Field, showed me about
a dozen orange and lemon trees in a private garden in the suburbs of
Adelaide all more or less infested with Icerya, and had been so for the
previous two years. _ The scales were nearly all full grown, or rather
nearly all of them had begun to exude cottony matter and deposit eggs,
yet they were not quite so far advanced as those observed at Sydney.
The very first scale examined contained nine pup of the parasitie fly,
Lestophonus, and the scale was still living. Nearly all of the many
12
others examined proved to have either larve or puparia within them ;
none of the flies had at that time made their appearance. I attended
the gardeners’ meeting at Adelaide on October 6, in order to get infor-
mation as to the occurrence of Icerya, yet but very few of the gentlemen
were acquainted with the insect. To show how rare Icerya is in South
Australia, Mr. J. G. O. Tepper, of the museum at Adelaide, a qualified
entomologist, who has collected insects all his life, has known Icerya
only for the last two years. He never met before this with any speci-
mens in all his collecting trips through South Australia. On October
15 I made a trip with Messrs. Crawford and Tepper to North Adelaide,
where some Icerya were said to exist; we found there in one garden a
few orange and lemon trees with the scales, which were subsequently
collected for shipment. In another garden, and also on orange, an oc-
Fic. 2.—Vedalia cardinalis: a, full grown 1 rva; b, pupa, dorsal Fic. 3.—Vedalia cardi-
view, inclosed ii: last larval skin; ¢, pupa, naked, ventral view— nalis, adult—enlarged
all enlarged (after Riley). (after Riley).
casional specinen was found. I discovered there, for the first time,
feeding upon a large female Icerya, the Lady-bird, which will become
famed in the United States— Vedalia cardinalis (Figs. 2 and 3). I called
the attention of both the gentlemen to this in-
sect, yet neither of them had ever seen it nor
knew the beetle. Mr. Tepper has charge of a
large collection of insects, and especially of Co-
leoptera, at the South Australian Museum. Mr.
Smith, the proprietor of the nursery, also called
my attention to a beetle, a curculio, which is
very destructive to olive-trees, eating the young
shoots and leaves of the plants during the night
and secreting itself in the ground during the
day-time (Fig. 4).*
Through the bureau of forestry at Adelaide I
was informed that a colony of Icerya existed at
. , Mannum, on the Murray River, and a trip to that
df A mn place was made on October 18. In two gardens
Fic. 4 ilies Sa a Icerya was present; in one of them they ex-
E v4 isted on only a few of the many orange-trees,
and none examined showed any parasites, while in the other on two
*This is an Otiorbynchid unknown to us, and will have to be referred to a spe-
cialist abroad.—C. V. R.
13
trees that were infested many of the scales were parasitized. In addi-
tion to the parasites, numerous larve and eggs of a lace-winged fly
(Chrysopa) were observed, the larve preying upon the scales and chiefly
upon their eggs. They were covered so much with the cottony matter
of Icerya as to resemble this insect very closely, and were difficult to
pick out from the torn masses of egg-saes. I also observed here a cole-
opterous (Coccinellid) larva, seen before at Adelaide, feeding on the
scales, and this proved to be that of the Vedalia. All the scales here,
as well as all the predaceous larvee found feeding upon them, were col-
lected and taken to Adelaide to be shipped to California, together with
those found at the latter place. They were kept boxed in a cool cellar.
The scales in Adelaide and suburbs were collected on October 24 and
25 at a place in North Adelaide. Nearly every one of the Iceryas ex-
posed to light and sun contained parasites, and many of these had
already left, as numerous holes were visible. Of the scales found ona
small and bushy mandarin tree, where they were excluded from the
sun, only a few contained parasites, but the larve of the Chrysopa were
abundant. Most of the larger egg-saes of Icerya were torn by them
and the contents devoured.
I observed also that many of the young scales, only sufficiently large
to contain a single puparium of the fly, were infested, the expanded
skin of Icerya forming a thin covering over the puparium of the Lesto-
phonus. This was observed at all places where Icerya occurred. No
‘doubt the eggs of the pest must be deposited while the scales are yet
quite small, probably even before the first molt, and certainly later,
as the scales will go on feeding and increasing in size until the larve
within them pupate. At this time large numbers of the scales were
hatching and also of the flies. Only one living fly was observed on
October 24 while collecting the scales, sitting between two large egg-
masses and hardly visible to the eye. This and a second specimen
taken under similar circumstances were the only ones I observed in nat-
ure. [have never met with asingle specimen depositing eggs or even
sitting on an Icerya nor flying around. I finished collecting for my
first shipment on the 25th and estimated that I had about 6,000 Icerya,
which in return would produce at an average about four parasites (Les-
tophonus) each. They were packed partly in wooden and partly in tin
boxes. Small branches generally full of scales were cut so as to fit
exactly lengthwise into the box. With these the boxes were filled and
all loose scales placed in between, plenty of space remaining for any
of the insects within to move about freely without danger of being
crushed by loose sticks. Salicylic acid was used in small quantities in
the tin boxes to prevent mold, yet these, as I have been informed by
Mr. Coquillett, arrived in a more or less moldy condition, while those
in wooden boxes always arrived safe. In addition, Dr. Schomburgh,
director of the botanical gardens at Adelaide, kindly fitted up for me
a Wardian case which was filled with living plants of oranges and Pit-
14
tosporum in pots. Large numbers of Icerya were placed in this, and
such larvie as were found feeding upon them, including some of a Scym-
nus* (Fig. 5), ouly occasionally found with Icerya, yet very abundant on
various Eucalyptus seales, especialiy on Hriococcus
eucalypti. Of this I sent large numbers to California
in my later shipments, as they were easily collected
by the hundreds under bark of Eucalyptus infested
with this Hriococeus. Mr. F. M. Webster brought
me the same insect in numbers from Tasinania, to-
ie gether with the EHriococcus on Eucalyptus. The
Fic. 5.—Seynnixs restitu. Object of this was to have the Lestophonus go on
tor—enlarged (original). ° See 2
breeding within the case during the voyage. No
doubt many infested scales arrived in Los Angeles.
I found on examining the tree, on April 12, 1889, under which this
case had been placed with a tent overit, that from several of the Iceryas
the Lestophonus bad issued. This case, as Mr. Coquillett informed me
in letter of November 30, arrived in good condition, except that the
putty had been knocked off in several places, leaving holes large enough
for the parasites to escape. Before opening the case he found two coc-
cinellid larve crawling on the outside, and these when placed with
the Icerya attacked it at once. He further said that there were only
about half a dozen living Chrysopa adults. This would show that the
Lestophonus was still issuing on arrival in California and all turned out
more favorably than I had anticipated on seeing the box handled in
such a rough manner by the steamer hands at Sydney, to which point
I accompanied this as well as allthe subsequent shipments. I expected
little good would come out of this method of sending and therefore con-
cluded to send only small parcels on ice thereafter, as had been partly
done at first. If once the insects could be placed in good condition in
the ice-house on the steamer just before leaving, where a temperature
of 38° Fah. at first and about 46° Fah. on arrival in San Francisco
existed, they must arrive safely. To accomplish this, the parasites with
their hosts were all collected the last three days before leaving Ade-
laide, and on arriving home were immediately placed in a cool cellar.
On the trip from Adelaide to Sydney, which takes two days by train,
my insects came generally in an ice-box on the sleeping-car.
On November 2 I made a trip to Gordon, 11 miles north of Sydney,
Mr. James Harold, agricultural reporter of the Town and Country
Journal, Sydney, having furnished me with the address of a prominent
fruit-grower there. Mr. Harold has traveled much over Australia
gathering information for his paper, yet, as he assured me, he never met
with an icerya. The same answer was received from the gentleman at
Gordon, who has been living in the colony for thirty-four years and has
raised oranges for thirty-two years. He knew only the three scales upon
* Dr, Sharp has since described this as Scymnus restitutor (Insect Life, P 364).
15
oranges, viz: Lecanium olee (Fig. 6) andthe Mytilaspis and Aspidiotus
aurantit. This latter is not doing any serious damage to his trees, pro-
viding they are well taken care of, yet he assured me that in some parts
of the colony it is impossible to raise oranges on account of the ravages
of this scale. For the Mytilaspis he uses sulphur and lime as a wash,
applying it with a paint brush. This he claims need only be repeated
every three years, as during this time the trees remain comparatively
free. The mixture is prepared in the following way :
Unslacked lime, two parts; sulphur, one part; water is poured on this
in sufficient quantities to boil and unite with it. It is applied as a
white-wash tothe trees and to prevent injury should not be too strong
Fic. 6.—Lecanium ole: 1, adult females on olive leaves—natural size; la, female—enlarged (after
Comstock).
Besides the scales, an Aphis appears occasionally on orange and peach
trees. Two beetles are numerous and destructive to the melon vines
here. One of them found at the time is a Diabrotica, often received by
Mr. Crawford, of Adelaide, as doing great injury to the melon tribe.
This gentleman, however, claims that all injury can be avoided by dust-
ing powdered lime over the plants. The beetles, he said, will not at-
‘tack leaves thus treated. I found here, as well as all over Australia
and New Zealand, the Woolly-Aphis (Schizoneura lanigera), yet they
could be seen only on tbe branches, as allor nearly all the apples raised
in the colonies and New Zealand are said to be grafted on blight-proof
16
stock. For this purpose, the Northern Spy of our continent is consid-
ered the best; next comes the Majetin, as Mr. Will, of Auckland, in-
formed me. The Irish peach was standing completely free of Aphis
between badly infested trees. A large number of blight-proof trees
are sold by nurserymen in Australia and New Zealand, and only such
are planted in these countries as far as the roots are concerned. Mr.
Will said that the Northern Spy will produce the best roots ; on this is
evafted the Majetin as the stem, and any desired
variety may be selected for the upper part or
branches. At this place | observed a small
black and lemon-yellow lady-bird (Fig. 7) feeding
upon the Woolly-Aphis; the same was also ob-
served at Toowoomba, Queensland, under similar
circumstances.* I did not meet with it outside of
these places. No Icerya could be found on the
orange trees, but the same day, two young spec-
Fic. 7.—Lady-bird feedingon jmens were found in the woods, about 2 miles
Woolly Aphis—enlar ged Z >
(original). distant, one of them on a pea-vine and the
second on aspecies of Salix, both near the ground.
November 5 I visited Mr. Joseph Purser at Castle Hill, to the west
of Sydney, also a prominent fruit-grower. No Icerya were found on the
numerous orange trees at this place. Mr. Purser reports having met
with an occasional specimen only on his orange trees, never more than
half adozen. A short distance from the orchard I noticed a small pond
on the edge of which were growing a few small bushes of Acacia. On
examination I found two large Iceryas with egg sacs and several empty
skins of scales. Mr. Purser informed me that in former years he has
often seen the scales upon trees growing along river banks. During this
same day, while searching through the bush, I found upon the needle-
bush Hakia acicularis, growing amongst numerous Acacia longifolia, a
well developed Icerya fastened to the main stem. A careful search
was made on all the plants growing there, yet with the exception of a
peculiar Ccelostoma upon Acacia, no scales could be found. One speci-
men of Icerya was found on this Acacia at the botanical gardens in
Adelaide. Mr. Purser, who is also much troubled with the Mytilaspis
mentioned, used as a remedy kerosene-tar, | pint; soft-soap, 3 pounds;
sulphur, 5 pounds. These are boiled in 10 gailons of water and the
trees washed with this mixture with a paint-brush, only the trunk and
larger limbs being treated. The gentleman claims that all the scales
on trees so treated will be killed and the trees will remain free from
scales from seven to nine years.
I returned to Adelaide on November 8, as I considered that the best
field to obtain the material. On the 15th a trip was made about 300
miles negth of Adelaide, but I found nothing of interest in the insect
line on- this journey, with the exception along the road of large, num-
* This species has been sent abroad for determination,—C, V. R,
=
17
bers of locusts traveling south in search of food, nothing being left for
them in the interior to feed upon. The country around Quorn was so
dry and hot that some Eucalyptus rostrata in a dry river-bed were all
the green vegetation that could be seen, and the locusts still met with
were unable to feed. Finding the search for Icerya in this district use-
less, I returned to Adelaide, where subsequently new colonies were
discovered for shipment. In conversation about the grasshoppers en
route, a gentleman remarked that only in such unusually dry seasons
as the present would the locusts migrate, there being no food left for
them in the interior of South Australia. Those around Quorn, he re-
marked, leit in a southeasterly direction down the valley toward Ade-
laide, while those coming from the interior went towards Spencer’s
Gulf. On my trip I observed them most abundantly about Black Rock
traveling south, not in clouds but scattered and never very high, simi-
lar to our Caloptenus devastator in California in 1885.* :
November 29 I began collecting material for my second shipment.
Already on some of the trees, well exposed to sun, about 90 per cent.
of the flies had left the scales, while on the trees in more shady places
more than half of the parasites were still within their hosts. Nota
single fly was observed, and yet they must have been about in large
numbers. Instead of this, I noticed sitting and walking about the
scales a peculiar Chalcidt (Fig. 8); this was suspected to be a secondary
“ny oF,
“14, ye
Wt tittegettpe nse’ /
Ay
Vd)
Fic. &.—Euryischia lestophoni, dorsal and side views—enlarged (after Riley.)
parasite, and during the day I noticed them ovipositing in the infested
Iceryas. The Lady-birds were at that time quite abundant in egg,
larva, pupa, and imago states, and special pains were taken not to
miss any of these during the collecting. The following four days were
“We have sent specimens of this locust to \. Henri de Saussure, of Geneva, Switz-
erland, for determination, but at the date of going to press have not received his
reply.—C. V. R.
t This is the species referred to in our annual report for 1888, p. 92, under the MS.
name Huryischia lestophoni.—C. V. R.
14134—No, 21——2
18 ‘
spent in gathering Icerya and its enemies. Many of the secondary par-
asites were again noticed, yet not a single Lestophonus. I gathered
during this time probably six thousand scales, and hardly a specimen
was noticed among them that was not parasitized by the Lestophonus.
All of them contained either puparia of the fly or empty holes where the
flies had issued. Knowing that if we should introduce the secondary
parasite the good work of Lestophonus on Icerya would be greatly re-
stricted, I sent the following notice to Mr. Coquillett, and also to your
office.
On account of a parasite of Lestophonus iceryw, remove the infested scales that I
send from the tree they were placed on, after six weeks, and transfer into large glass
jars; examine daily by stupetying the insects that have issued, with chloroform or
ether, empty contents on table, pick out the flies and destroy their parasites. Form
anew colony with every consigument you receive.
In your letter of January 3 in regard to this secondary parasite you
wrote:
The parasite bred from Kermes and the one from confined Jeerya and which you
think to be parasitic upon Lestophonus are different species of the same genus. The
genus is an entirely new one belonging to the Chalcid subfamily Llasminew. This sub-
family is an extremely interesting one, and up to the present time has contained only
the typical genus Elasmus, so that this finding of a new genus is important. Hlasmus
contains both secondary and primary parasites, so that it will be necessary to secure
pretty good evidence regarding this new form before we can accept it as either one
or the other.
From seventy-five specimens of Kermes no Lestophonus was bred. On
the 26th I left Adelaide on my way to Sydney, with what I considered
even a better shipment than the first. Unfortunately this lot arrived
in a bad condition at San Francisco, owing to a gale on the route when
the parcels fell off the shelving in the ice-house, in which they had
been placed, and most of them were crushed by cakes of ice falling on
them. In my opinion, even such severe treatment as this would not
destroy so very many of the pup of Lestophonus, which are not soft,
and if crushed out of the scale wili produce flies if properly taken
care of later, as I had ample opportunity to observe while in Australia.
Among this lot of things were also about fifteen hundred eggs of the
Chrysopa which were collected on Kangaroo Acacia (A. armata) infested
by a Dactylopius, which is often taken to be Icerya. The scale is some-
times so abundant that the plants are entirely covered with it. This
was the case during my visit, and, as Mr. Crawford informed me, also in
1882. Mr. Maskell, to whom specimens were forwarded by Mr. Craw-
ford, said that the insect belongs to the Dactylopinw. The eggs of the
Chrysopa were so abundant that often from twenty to thirty could be
counted on a single small outer branch of a few inches in length, yet
many of these had already hatched. The number of Lady-birds in all
stages sent with this lot amounted to several hundred. The weather
was unusually hot during two days of collecting, the thermometer regis-
tered 108° Fah. in the shade, and from one small box left in room
over night, where the temperature had not been below 90° Fah., about
eo
‘fifty of the flies issued during the night and early morning. They
were crawling on the window at 6a.m. Many more were found within
the box, with wings not yet developed.
I returned again to Adelaide within four days, the time taken in
making the trip. I wrote to the United States consular agent, Mr.
George Harris, at Brisbane, Queensland, te ascertain forme the occur-
rence of Icerya in that district. Through the department of ‘orestry
at Adelaide I was informed that Icerya existed at Stansbury, on the
Yorka Peninsula, at the place of Mr.F. Wurm. Accordingly a trip was
made across the water on October 1, and I was kindly and hospitably
received by Mr. Wurm. That gentleman showed me a small orange-
tree completely covered with Icerya, but aside from this, not a single
specimen could be found for miles around, nor had they ever been ob-
served before this. The tree infested with the scales was completely
covered with a small black ant, so much so that several conld be count-
ed upon each of the scales at the same time. Upon examination only
two specimens of the Icerya were found to be parasitized by the Les-
tophonus, and these had already left. No doubt the abundance of the
ants upon the scales prevented the flies from ovipositing. I recom-
mended keeping the ants off the tree as the scales would then dis-
appear.
How often must the mother flies have been hovering over this young
tree in their attempt to lay eggs, and how many of them must have
been carried off as food for the young of the industrious ants! Mr.
Wurm also informed me that Icerya had been fouud by him upon the
roots of black grass. On examination, however, this proved to be an
entirely different coccid, Lecanium ole, which had found its way to
this place in small colonies on olive-trees. The cut-worms had done
considerable damage to fruit-trees, grape-vines, aud other vegetation
during November. Some of the apple-trees were completely stripped
of their foliage. Melolonthid larvee had been very injurious to the
wheat crop by eating the roots.* The common grasshopper was also in
abundance here.t+
On December 6, from four large specimens of Icerya that had been
inclosed, thirty-four flies (Lestophonus) and five parasites of the latter
had issued. I examined condition of Icerya on place from which last
sending was made, and from which nearly every one of the old and
infested scales had been removed, the trees at the time being full of
large Iceryas; yet at this date but very few of them were left, the coc-_
cinellid larvee and the Chrysopa in conjunction doing good work, eat-
ing, no doubt, the healthy as well as the infested scales. Some of them
had apparently gone through second molt, yet the greater part were
* Three species of Melolonthid beetles were collected at this point by Mr. Koebele,
and being unknown to our fauna will have to be carefully studied for determination.
—C. V.R.
t The same undetermined species referred to on p. 17.
20
still in the first stage. Only very small larve of the Lestophonus were
found within seales after first and second molts. Within a uearly full-
grown specimen on trunk of lemon-tree, the only large one found there,
two larve of the fly were nearly full-grown.
I left on December 10 for Melbourne, seeing that it was necessary to -
hunt up a new field. There I had hopes of gathering a sufficient quan-
tity for a shipment. The largest colony I was able to discover at Mel- ~
bourne existed in a church-yard on Collins street, upon small trees of
Pittosporum undulatum. Icould not find the proper person to apply to
for admittance, and a policeman whom I consulted in regard to getting
the tempting specimens advised me ‘‘not to jump from the fence as
they surely would have me arrested.”
I left them undisturbed and went in search of others. A few speci-
mens existed in the gardens of the government buildings; an occa-
sional specimen in the park adjoining the Exposition grounds ; some on
a hedge in front of a hotel, and single specimens were found on trees
in a park at St. Kilda, while at the same place on a garden hedge quite
anumber were found; all these on Pittosporum undulatum and P. (engeni-
oides?), At the last-named place the lady-birds were found at work,
and all were gathered later for shipment. I went east of Melbourne as
far as Bairnsdale, yet no Icerya could be found. > -—_____—
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1890.
Yeo UEPARIMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 21.
(Revised Edition.)
|p Shel ees © ial Sa
OF A
Pale Or SiR A ELA
MADE UNDER DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST
TO INVESTIGATE THE
NATURAL ENEMIES OF THE FLUTED SCALE,
BY
ALBERT BORE.
fe 2082
‘MAR 28 | 90
She as
7HSewian OER
(PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.)
WesHiInGTon:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1890.
o
ws
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., November 22, 1889.
Sir: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 21 of
this Division, being the report of Mr. Albert Koebele upon the Fluted
Seale (Icerya purchasi Maskell) and its natural enemies in Australia.
I had intended to incorporate it in my forthcoming annual report, but
the limited space alloted to that report makes it necessary to publish
this as a separate bulletin.
Respectfully,
€.. VV. RiLEy,
Entomologist.
Hon. J. M. RUSK,
Secretary of Agriculture.
INTRODUCTION.
The following report by Mr. Albert Koebele, one of the California
agents of the Division of Entomology, gives an account of his trip to
Australia, made during the late summer and fall of 1888 and the winter
of 188889, under instructions from this Department, for the purpose
of investigating the Australian natural enemies of the Fluted Scale
(Icerya purchasi Maskell) with a view to introducing the most efficient
of them into California.
Failing to secure a specific appropriation from Congress for this pur-
pose, although assisted in the attempt by the California delegation,
and particularly by the Hon. C. M. Felton, and failing also to secure
the removal of the clause restricting travel to the limits of the United
States, we were led to accomplish the result through the kindness of
the Department of State, in connection with the Melbourne Exposition,
an arrangement having been made whereby two of the salaried agents
of the Division should be temporarily attached to the Commission,
their expenses, outside the United States, to be defrayed by the Com-
mission, within the sum of $2.000. The warm thanks of this Depart-
ment are due to the Department of State for this codperation, and par-
ticularly to the Hon. Frank McCoppin, commissioner-general to the
Exposition, to whom the matter was submitted by the State Department
for approval. Mr. McCoppin at once accepted the proposition, and
upon Mr. Koebele’s arrival in Australia helped him in every way possi-
ble to make the experiment successful.
Mr. Koebele was sent, as just stated, for the specific purpose of study-
ing and importing the natural enemies of the Fluted Scale, while the
other agent, Mr. F. M. Webster, was sent to make a special report to
the Commission on the agricultural features of the Exposition. Mr.
Webster’s report has been sent to the Commission, and was formally
submitted to Mr. McCoppin. A copy of the present report, although
purely entomological, and having little relation tothe Exposition proper,
has also been transmitted to Mr. McCoppin, as the results of the mis-
sion are, and ever will be, connected with his exposition work.
While a number of other entomological matters are referred to in the
report, Mr. Koebele never lost sight of the main object of his mission.
How successful it has proved late reports already published in INSECT
5
6
LIFE, and elsewhere, have abundantly testified. They have more than
justified the anticipations expressed in my last annual report:
We fully expect to learn of the increase and rapid spread of this new introduction
as well as some of the other predaceous species which have been introduced, and to
find that in a comparatively few years the orange groves of southern California will
be kept measurably freed of the pernicious Fluted Scale without so great an effort on
the part of the growers or so great expense in destroying it. That nature will, with
the new conditions induced by these importations, come to the relief of the fruit-
grower, and that this interesting experiment will result in the ultimate saving of
untold millions to the people of the Pacific Coast is our sincere belief which we hope
to see verified. Not that we expect the Icerya to be ever entirely exterminated ;
but it will be kept under subjection so as to be comparatively harmless, as it is in its
native country.
One of the insects imported, viz, the Cardinal Vedalia (Vedalia cardi-
nalis Mulsant), has multiplied and increased to such an extentas to rid
many of the orange groves from Icerya and to promise immunity in the
near future for the entire State of California. In fact, the rapid multi-
plication and the effective work of this little beetle are almost incom-
prehensible until we come to consider its power of increase in a climate
like that of southern California, where there is scarcely any cessation in
its activities.
A careful account of the transformations of the Vedalia has been pre-
pared by Mr. Coquillett and was published in INSECT LIFE for Sep-
tember, 1889, pages 70 to 74. I reproduce the figures in connection with
Mr. Koebele’s report in order to familiarize those who have not yet seen
it with its appearance. I have also had some other figures made to ac-
company the report.
The period from the laying of the eggs until the adults again appear
occupies less than thirty days for the Vedalia. At this rate of increase,
calculating that three hundred eggs are laid by each female, and that
one half of these produce females, it will readily be seen that in six
months the offspring of a single female beetle may under favorable cir-
cumstances amount to over twenty-two trillions. So far it has not been
noticed to prey upon any other insect than the Fluted Seale, a fact which
accounts somewhat for its exceptionally rapid work and renders the
outlook extremely encouraging.
Uf the other enemies of the Icerya referred to and more particularly
mentioned in the latter part of Mr. Koebele’s report, none of them have
so far given much promise, and there is risk of their not being colonized
by virtue of the extraordinary spread and increase of the Vedalia,
which has swept away from whole regions the Fluted Scale, upon which
they depend. This contingency should have been avoided and I very
much regret that they have not become established in California, be-
cause their establishment, and especially that of the little Dipteron,
Cryptochetum icerye, would have helped in the general subjection of
the pest and would be particularly valuable whenever the Vedalia, for
whatever reason, at any time practically forsakes a given locality.
Where possible 1 have endeavored by foot-notes to add to the specific
accuracy of the insects referred to.
C. V. RB.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
ALAMEDA, CAL., July 7, 1889.
Sir: I herewith submit my reportupon the study of Icerya purchasi in
Australia and New Zealand and the introduction of its parasites and
enemies into California, undertaken under your direction and in ac-
cordance with your letter of instructions. *
Respectfully yours,
ALBERT KOEBELE,
Special Agent.
Prot CoV. RILEY;
U. S. Entomologist.
*The following is extracted from the letter of instructions :
WASHINGTON, July 3, 1888.
* ** As you are already aware you are sent to Australia for the purpose of mak-
ing an investigation of the parasites and other natural enemies of Icerya purchasi
with a view of introducing them into California. It will be necessary for you to go to
Adelaide to see Mr. Frazer 8, Crawford, who sent over the first Dipterous parasites
and the Celostomas (or rather Monophlebus crawfordi). This Dipterous parasite has
been named by Dr. Willsiton Lestophonus icerye, and at Adelaide you will probably
be able to study this insect carefully. Make the most careful investigations where
you can learn of the occurrence of Icerya, and find all of its natural enemies in Austra
lia. Find out also the periods at which these parasites oviposit and ascertain the
season at which success in importation will be most likely with each and all of them.
Once on the ground you can see for yourself just what will be necessary to be done in
order to bring about this result. You should also endeavor to place the Department
in correspondence with as many observers as you can interest in the subject, and
should by all means endeavor to get at least one man who will be able to devote some
time to the matter and continue observations after you leave. It is barely possible
that we may be able to re-imburse some such person for the time expended, but for
this I will write you later, if indeed I do not see you personally in Australia in No-
vember. You will, of course, inquire immediately upon arriving in Melbourne concern-
ing the largest orange-growing districts in Australia, and also make inquiries as to the
best places for observing Icerya, aside from Adelaide. If you will visit the Botanic
Gardens in Melbourne you will be able to get some information there. Baron von
Mueller, formerly director of the Botanic Gardens, is still a resident of that city and
you will find him a very well-informed person to consult. I inclose you letters of in-
troduction both to Mr. Crawford and Baron von Mueller. * * *
On this trip your salary will be paid as usual by this Department, but your ex-
penses by the Department of State through Mr. McCoppin. * * *
7
REPORT OF THE FLUTED SCALE OF THE ORANGE AND ITS
NATURAL ENEMIES IN AUSTRALIA,
By ALBERT KOEBELE.
In accordance with the commission received from the Hon. Norman
J. Colman, United States Commissioner of Agriculture, and your letter
of July 3, 1888, I left San Francisco on August 25, and arrived at Auck-
land, New Zealand, on September 14, where some hours were spentin get-
ting information in regard to Icerya. I visited Mr. W. Will, editor of
the New Zealand Herald and Auckland Weekly News, who then, and
subsequently on my later visit, gave me valuable information in regard
to the occurrence and disappearance of Icerya in the Auckland districts,
as well as many other points of interest in horticulture ; and also Mr. T.
F. Cheeseman, curator of the Auckland Museum, who readily accom-
panied me to a place full of Albizzia (Acacia) lophantha, Bentham, which
had been about three years previously completely covered with Icerya.
I made a careful search for specimens on these trees, yet only four full-
grown females with large egg-sacs could be found. On one of the scales
two rather large mites were feeding, attached to the under side; and the
masses of old and moldy remains of Icerya were still visible on the
trunks of trees.
A residence on which formerly were many orange trees was also vis-
ited. ‘I‘here all of the trees had been cut down on account of the num-
erous scales, and at the time of my visit no Icerya could be found and
none were observed during the year as the proprietors informed me.
No one was able to state the exact reason of the disappearance of the
scales; some disease was the supposed cause.
The steamer left Auckland the following day and arrived in Sydney,
New South Wales, September 20. I remained there for four days in
search of Icerya. On my first walk a number of them were discovered
at the town hall premises, infesting a Pittosporum (P. wndulatum), and
the succeeding days a few more were found in one of the public parks,
also on this Pittosporum. A large isolated acacia tree full of the scales
was found in front of a private house in the eastern part of Sydney;
all were full-grown females with more or less developed egg-sacs and ap-
9
10
parently in a healthy condition. As the trees infested were all inclosed,
no proper examination could be made and the few obtained at the town
hall showed no trace of parasites. A trip was also made to Parramatta,
about 14 miles to the west of Sydney, to look into some of the orange
orchards. I found nearly all the trees badly infested with the red-scale
(Aspidiotus aurantii Maskell, Fig. 1), and still worse with what I con-
Fig. 1.—Aspidiotus auwrantii Maskell: 1, scales on leaf of orange, natural size; 1a, adult male; 1b,
scales of female; ic, scale of male—enlarged (after Comstock).
sidered to be Mytilaspis gloverii Packard.* Indeed, some of the trees
are completely covered by this latter scale, having the appearance of
an old coat of whitewash on the bark which had partly fallen off. None
of the several orange-growers there visited had ever seen ap Icerya or
was familiar with the insect. I left Sydney on the 24th and arrived in
Melbourne the following day, having in the meantime, through the
kindness of the United States consul, obtained a free pass over the New
South Wales Railway, which courtesy was shown me by all the colonies
subsequently visited. Indeed, I can not speak too highly of the kind-
ness Shown me by all the Government officials, and of the interest they
took in the successful execution of my work. I remained in Melbourne
for six days, during which time I visited Baron Ferdinand von Mueller,
to whom you had given me letters of introduction. This gentleman
assured ine that the Icerya never became extensively injurious in Aus-
*A careful study of the pygidial characters of this scale shows it to be much nearer
M. pomorum than M. gloverii. It seems, however, to be distinct from the former and
will probably prove to be new.
ie)
tralia. Occasionally and in certain spots they became numerous, but
always disappeared again. Ialso met Mr. C. French, Baron von Muel-
ler’s assistant, who has had some experience in entomology. He
claims that the scale has been known to him for thirty-four years,
yet he has never seen it in large numbers.
At the Zoological Gardens I found on a species of Eucalyptus a coc-
cid in such numbers as to cover the under side of all the larger branches
and the stem in part. Many of the winged males were secreted among
the crevices of bark, with their two long white setous hairs protruding.
Numerous larve of a coleopter were found under chips of bark feeding
upon the scales, apparently belonging to some clerid. I never met
with these larvee again in my later researches nor with the coccid men-
tioned. A great variety of scales was observed at Melbourne; the
most pernicious amongst them, a species of Aspidiotus, deserved atten-
tion. This is A. rossi Crawford, figured on his plate 18 of the Coccide,
but as yet no description has appeared to my knowledge. I have seen
olive trees completely covered by this seale; it will attack almost any
kind of tree or shrub as I later observed. Many of the shrubs in the
Botanical Gardens in Melbourne infested by this scale were in a dying
condition. .The introduction of this pest would be of serious conse-
quence to the United States and we should be on our guard against
this as well as a second species of waxy scale, probably a species of
Ceroplastes. This last is covered by a thick, smooth, white, waxy mat-
ter which effectually protects it. Nothing would destroy this scale,
except remedies against the newly hatched larve, which, before they
exude any wax, are easily killed. The insect was observed all over
eastern Australia, and it was numerous in the Botanical Garden at Syd-
ney and in the woods near Brisbane. At the Botanical Gardens they
could find no remedy except cutting down the infested plants. I recom-
mended a strong resin wash for the newly hatched larve. No Icerya
could be found during my short stay at Melbourne.
I arrived at Adelaide, South Australia, on October 2, with letters of
introduction to Mr. Frazer 8S. Crawford, of the surveyor general’s office,
who received me very kindly and promised me his assistance, which
promise he honorably fulfiiled throughout my stay in Adelaide. I saw
the man who discovered the parasites of Icerya (Lestophonus icerye),
and, indeed, felt very bappy when he promised to show me a large col.
ony of the scales on the following day. Early the next morning Mr. A.
Molineux, agricultural editor of the South Australian Register and Ade-
laide Observer, and proprietor of the Garden and Field, showed me about
a dozen orange and lemon trees in a private garden in the suburbs of
Adelaide all more or less infested with Icerya, and had been so for the
previous two years. The scales were nearly all full grown, or rather
nearly all of them had begun to exude cottony matter and deposit eggs,
yet they were not quite so far advanced as those observed at Sydney.
The very first scale examined contained nine pupe of the parasitic fly,
Lestophonus, and the scale was still living. Nearly all of the many
\
12
others examined proved to have either larvz or puparia within them ;
none of the flies had at that time made their appearance. I attended
the gardeners’ meeting at Adelaide on October 6, in order to get infor-
mation as to the occurrence of Icerya, yet but very few of the gentlemen
were acquainted with the insect. To show how rare Icerya is in South
Australia, Mr. J. G. O. Tepper, of the museum at Adelaide, a qualified
entomologist, who has collected insects all his life, has known Icerya
only for the last two years. He never met before this with any speci-
mens in all his collecting trips through South Australia. On October
15 I made a trip with Messrs. Crawford and Tepper to North Adelaide,
where some Icerya were said to exist; we found there in one garden a
few orange and lemon trees with the scales, which were subsequently
collected for shipment. In another garden, and also on orange, an oc-
Fic. 2.—Vedalia cardinalis: a, full grown larva; b, pupa, dorsal Fic. 3.—Vedalia cardi-
view, inclosed iz last larval skin; c, pupa, naked, ventral view— nalis, adult—enlarged
all enlarged (after Riley). (after Riley).
casional specimen was found. I discovered there, for the first time,
feeding upon a large female Icerya, the Lady-bird, which will become
famed in the United States— Vedalia cardinalis (Figs. 2 and 3). I called
the attention of both the gentlemen to this in-
sect, yet neither of them had ever seen it nor
knew the beetle. Mr. Tepper has charge of a
large collection of insects, and especially of Co-
leoptera, at the South Australian Museum. Mr.
Smith, the proprietor of the nursery, also called
my attention to a beetle, a curculio, which is
very destructive to olive-trees, eating the young
shoots and leaves of the plants during the night
and secreting itself in the ground during the
day-time (Fig. 4).*
Through the bureau of forestry at Adelaide I
was informed that a colony of Icerya existed at
Mannum, on the Murray River, and a trip to that
place was made on October 18. In two gardens
Icerya was present; in one of them they ex-
(Otiorhynchus cribricollis) — E
enlarged (original). isted on only a few of the many orange-trees,
and none examined showed any parasites, while in the other on two
*Dr, Sharp, to whom we submitted specimens, has kindly determined this beetle to
be Otiorhynchus cribricollis Gyll., a common pest to the Olive in the Mediterranean
region.
13
trees that were infested many of the scales were parasitized. In addi-
tion to the parasites, numerous larve and eggs of a lace-winged fly
(Chrysopa) were observed, the larve preying upon the scales and chiefly
upon their eggs. They were covered so much with the cottony matter
of Icerya as to resemble this insect very closely, and were difficult to
pick out from the torn masses of egg-sacs. I also observed here a cole-
opterous (Coccinellid) larva, seen before at Adelaide, feeding on the
scales, and this proved to be that of the Vedalia. All the scales here,
as well as all the predaceous larve found feeding upon them, were col-
lected and taken to Adelaide to be shipped to California, together with
those found at the latter place. They were kept boxed in a cool cellar.
The scales in Adelaide and suburbs were collected on October 24 and
25 at a place in North Adelaide. Nearly every one of the Iceryas ex-
posed to light and sun contained parasites, and many of these had
’ already left, as numerous holes were visible. Of the scales found on a
small and bushy mandarin tree, where they were excluded from the
sun, only a few contained parasites, but the larve of the Chrysopa were
abundant. Most of the larger egg-sacs of Icerya were torn by them
and the contents devoured.
I observed also that many of the young scales, only sufficiently large
to contain a single puparium of the fly, were infested, the expanded
skin of Icerya forming a thin covering over the puparium of the Lesto-
phonus. This was observed at all places where Icerya occurred. No
doubt the eggs of the pest must be deposited while the scales are yet
quite small, probably even before the first molt, and certainly later,
as the scales will go on feeding and increasing in size until the larve
within them pupate. At this time large numbers of the scales were
hatching and also of the flies. Only one living fly was observed on
October 24 while collecting the scales, sitting between two large egg-
masses and hardly visible to the eye. This and a second specimen
taken under similar circumstances were the only ones I observed in nat-
ure. Ihave never met with asingle specimen depositing eggs or even
sitting on an Icerya nor flying around. I finished collecting for my
first shipment on the 25th and estimated that I had about 6,000 Icerya,
which in return would produce at an average about four parasites (Les-
tophonus) each. They were packed partly in wooden and partly in tin
boxes. Small branches generally full of scales were cut so as to fit
exactly lengthwise into the box. With these the boxes were filled and
all loose scales placed in between, plenty of space remaining for any
of the insects within to move about freely without danger of being
crushed by loose sticks. Salicylic acid was used in small quantities in
the tin boxes to prevent mold, yet these, as I have been informed by
Mr. Coquillett, arrived in a more or less moldy condition, while those
in wooden boxes always arrived safe. In addition, Dr. Schomburgh,
director of the botanical gardens at Adelaide, kindly fitted up for me
a Wardian case which was filled with living plants of oranges and Pit-
14
tosporum in pots. Large numbers of Icerya were placed in this, and
such larvee as were found feeding upon them, including some of a Scym-
nus* (Fig. 5), only occasionally found with Icerya, yet very abundant on
various Eucalyptus scales, especially on Eriococecus
eucalypti. Of this I sent large numbers to California
in my later shipments, as they were easily collected
by the hundreds under bark of Eucalyptus infested
with this EHriococcus. Mr. F. M. Webster brought
me the same insect in numbers from Tasmania, to-
gether with the Hriococcus on Eucalyptus. The
Fic. 5.—Khizobius ventra- object of this was to have the Lestophonus go on
lis Er.—enlarged (orig- Z es #
inal). breeding within the case during the voyage. No
doubt many infested scales arrived in Los Angeles.
I found on examining the tree, on April 12, 1889, under which this
case had been placed with a tent overit, that from several of the Iceryas.
the Lestophonus had issued. This case, as Mr. Coquillett informed me
in letter of November 30, arrived in good condition, except that the
putty had been knocked off in several places, leaving holes large enough
for the parasites to escape. Before opening the case he found two coc-
cinellid larve crawling on the outside, and these when placed with
the Icerya attacked it at once. He further said that there were only
about half a dozen living Chrysopa adults. This would show thatthe
Lestophonus was still issuing on arrival in California and all turned out
more favorably than I had anticipated on seeing the box handled in
such a rough manner by the steamer hands at Sydney, to which point
I accompanied this as wellas allthe subsequent shipments. I expected
little good would come out of this method of sending and therefore con-
cluded to send only small parcels on ice thereafter, as had been partly
done at first. If once the insects could be placed in good condition in
the ice-house on the steamer just before leaving, where a temperature
of 38° Fah. at first and about 46° Fah. on arrival in San Francisco
existed, they must arrive safely. To accomplish this, the parasites with
their hosts were all collected the last three days before leaving Ade-
laide, and on arriving home were immediately placed in a cool cellar.
On the trip from Adelaide to Sydney, which takes two days by train,
my insects came generally in an ice-box on the sleeping-car.
On November 2 I made a trip to Gordon, 11 miles north of Sydney,
Mr. James Harold, agricultural reporter of the Town and Country
Journal, Sydney, having furnished me with the address of a prominent
fruit-grower there. Mr. Harold has traveled much over Australia
gathering information for his paper, yet, as he assured me, he never met
with an Icerya. The same answer was received from the gentleman at
Gordon, who has been living in the colony for thirty-four years and has
raised oranges for thirty-two years. He knew only the three scales upon_
* Dr. Sharp described this as Scymnus restitutor (Insect Life, I, 364), but has since
written us that it is identical with Rhizobius ventralis Er., of the Munich catalogue.
He states, however, that it belongs rather to Scymnus than to Rhizobius.
15
oranges, viz: Lecanium olee (Fig. 6) and the Mytilaspis and Aspidiotus
aurantit. This latter is not doing any serious damage to his trees, pro-
viding they are well taken care of, yet he assured me that in some parts
of the colony it is impossible to raise oranges on account of the ravages
of this scale. For the Mytilaspis he uses sulphur and lime as a wash,
applying it with a paint brush. This he claims need only be repeated
every three years, as during this time the trees remain comparatively
free. The mixture is prepared in the following way:
Unslacked lime, two parts; sulphur, one part; water is poured on this
in sufficient quantities to boil and unite with it. It is applied asa
white-wash to the trees and to prevent injury should not be too strong
+
NB ye
Fic. 6.—Lecanium ole: 1, adult females on olive leaves—natural size; la, female—enlarged (after
Comstock).
Besides the scales, an Aphis appears occasionally on orange and peach
trees. Two beetles are numerous and destructive to the melon vines
here. One of them found at the time is a Diabrotica, often received by
Mr. Crawford, of Adelaide, as doing great injury to the melon tribe.
This gentleman, however, claims that all injury can be avoided by dust-
ing powdered lime over the plants. The beetles, he said, will not at-
tack leaves thus treated. I found here, as well as all over Australia
and New Zealand, the Woolly-Aphis (Schizoneura lanigera), yet they
could be seen only on the branches, as allor nearly all the apples raised
in the colonies and New Zealand are said to be grafted on blight-proof
16
stock. For this purpose, the Northern Spy of our continent is consid-
ered the best; next comes the Majetin, as Mr. Will, of Auckland, in-
formed me. The Irish peach was standing completely free of Aphis
between badly infested trees. A large number of blight-proof trees
are sold by nurserymen in Australia and New Zealand, and only such
are planted in these countries as far as the roots are concerned. Mr.
Will said that the Northern Spy will produce the best roots; on this is
grafted the Majetin as the stem, and any desired
variety may be selected for the upper part or
branches. At this place I observed a small
black and lemon-yellow lady-bird (Fig. 7) feeding
upon the Woolly-Aphis; the same was also ob-
served at Toowoomba, Queensland, under similar
circumstances.* I did not meet with it outside of
these places. No Icerya could_be found on the
orange trees, but the same day, two young spec-
Fic. 7.—Leis conformis, found imens were found in the woods, about 2 miles
feeding on Woolly Aphis— ; ‘
enlarged (original). distant, one of them on a pea-vine and the
second on aspecies of Salix, both near the ground.
November 5 I visited Mr. Joseph Purser at Castle Hil, to the west
of Sydney, also a prominent fruit-grower. No Icerya were found on the
numerous orange trees at this place. Mr. Purser reports having met
with an occasional specimen only on his orange trees, never more than
half adozen. A short distance from the orchard I noticed a small pond
on the edge of which were growing a few small bushes of Acacia. On
examination I found two large Iceryas with egg sacs and several empty
skins of scales. Mr. Purser informed me that in former years be has
often seen the scales upon trees growing along river banks. During this
same day, while searching through the bush, I found upon the needle-
bush Hakia acicularis, growing amongst numerous Acacia longifolia, a
well developed Icerya fastened to the main stem. A careful search
was made on all the plants growing there, yet with the exception of a
peculiar Coelostoma upon Acacia, no scales could be found. One speci-
men of Icerya was found on this Acacia at the botanical gardens in
Adelaide. Mr. Purser, who is also much troubled with the Mytilaspis
mentioned, used as a remedy kerosene-tar, 1 pint; soft-soap, 3 pounds;
sulphur, 5 pounds. These are boiled in 10 gallons of water and the
trees washed with this mixture with a paint-brush, only the trunk and
larger limbs being treated. The gentleman claims that all the scales
on trees so treated will be killed and the trees will remain free from
scales from seven to nine years.
I returned to Adelaide on November 8, as I considered that the best
field to obtain the material. On the 15th a trip was made about 300
miles north of Adelaide, but I found nothing of interest in the insect
line on this journey, with the exception along the road of large num-
*This species is Leis conformis Boisd., according to Dr. Sharp, to whom we sent
specimens.
Ie
bers of locusts traveling south in search of food, nothing being left for
them in the interior to feed upon. The country around Quorn was so
dry and hot that some Hucalyptus rostrata in a dry river-bed were all
the green vegetation that could be seen, and the locusts still met with
were unable to feed. Finding the search for Icerya in this district use-
less, I returned to Adelaide, where subsequently new colonies were
discovered for shipment. In conversation about the grasshoppers en
route, a gentleman remarked that only in such unusually dry seasons
as the present would the locusts migrate, there being no food left for
them in the interior of South Australia. Those around Quorn, he re-
marked, leit in a southeasterly direction down the valley toward Ade-
laide, while those coming from the interior went towards Spencer’s
Gulf. On my trip I observed them most abundantly about Black Rock
traveling south, not in clouds but scattered and never very high, simi-
lar to our Caloptenus devastator in California in 1885,.*
November 29 I began collecting material for my second shipment.
Already on some of the trees, well exposed to sun, about 90 per cent.
of the flies had left the scales, while on the trees in more shady places
morethan half of the parasites were still within their hosts. Nota
single fly was observed, and yet they must have been about in large
numbers. Instead of this, I noticed sitting and walking about the
scales a peculiar Chalcidt (Fig. 8); this was suspected to be a secondary
Fic. 8.—Euryischia lestophoni, dorsal and side views—enlarged (after Riley.)
parasite, and during the day I noticed them ovipositing in the infested
Iceryas. The Lady-birds were at that time quite abundant in egg,
larva, pupa, and imago states, and special pains were taken not to
miss any of these during the collecting. The following four days were
we eS eee
” As kindly determined by M. Henri de Saussure, of Geneva, Switzerland. This is
the Chortologa australis of his monograph of the Tryxalidz, not yet completed.
t This is the species referred to in our annual report for 1888, p. 92, under the MS.
name Kuryischia lestophoni.
14151—No. 21
9
_
18
spent in gathering Icerya and itsenemies. Many of the secondary par-
asites were again noticed, yet not a single Lestophonus. I gathered
during this time probably six thousand scales, and hardly a specimen
was noticed among them that was not parasitized by the Lestophonus.
All of them contained either puparia of the fly or empty holes where the
flies had issued. Knowing that if we should introduce the secondary
parasite the good work of Lestophonus on Icerya would be greatly re-
stricted, I sent the following notice to Mr. Coquillett, and also to your
office.
On account of a parasite of Lestophonus iceryew, remove the infested scales that I
send from the tree they were placed on, after six weeks, and transfer into large glass
jars; examine daily by stupefying the insects that have issued, with chloroform or
ether, empty contents on table, pick out the’flies and destroy their parasites. Form
a new colony with every consignment you receive.
In your letter of January 3 in regard to this secondary parasite you
wrote:
The parasite bred from Kermes and the one from confined Icerya and which you
think to be parasitic upon Lestophonus are different species of the same genus. The
genusis an entirely new one belonging to the Chalcid subfamily Zlasmine. This sub-
family is an extremely interesting one, and up to the present time has contained only
the typical genus Llasmus, so that this finding of a new genus is important. Hlasmus
contains both secondary and primary parasites, so that it will be necessary to secure
pretty good evidence regarding this new form before we can accept it as either one
or the other.
From seventy-five specimens of Kermes no Lestophonus was bred. On
the 26th I left Adelaide on my way to Sydney, with what I considered
even a better shipment than the first. Unfortunately this lot arrived
in a bad condition at San Francisco, owing to a gale on the route when
the parcels fell off the shelving in the ice-house, in which they had
been placed, and most of them were crushed by cakes of ice falling on
them. In my opinion, even such severe treatment as this would not
destroy so very many of the pup of Lestophonus, which are not soft,
and if crushed out of the scale wili produce flies if properly taken
care of later, as I had ample opportunity to observe while in Australia.
Among this lot of things were also about fifteen hundred eggs of the
Chrysopa which were collected on Kangaroo Acacia (A. armata) infested
by a Dactylopius, which is often taken to be Icerya. The scale is some-
times so abundant that the plants are entirely covered with it. This
was the case during my visit, and, as Mr. Crawford informed me, also in
1882. Mr. Maskell, to whom specimens were forwarded by Mr. Craw-
ford, said that the insect belongs to the Dactylopine. The eggs of the
Chrysopa were so abundant that often from twenty to thirty could be
counted on a single small outer branch of a few inches in length, yet
many of these had already hatched. The number of Lady-birds in all
stages sent with this lot amounted to several hundred. The weather
was unusually hot during two days of collecting, the thermometer regis-
tered 108° Fah. in the shade, and from one small box left in room
over night, where the temperature had not been below 90° Fah., about
19
fifty of the flies issued during the night and early morning. They
were crawling on the window at 6a.m. Many more were found within
the box, with wings not yet developed.
I returned again to Adelaide within four days, the time taken in
making the trip. I wrote to the United States consular agent, Mr.
George Harris, at Brisbane, Queensland, to ascertain for me the occur-
rence of Icerya in that district. Through the department of forestry
at Adelaide I was informed that Icerya existed at Stansbury, on the
Yorka Peninsula, at the place of Mr.F. Wurm. Accordingly a trip was
made across the water on October 1, and I was kindly and hospitably
received by Mr. Wurm. That gentleman showed me a small orange-
tree completely covered with Icerya, but aside from this, not a single
specimen could be found for miles around, nor had they ever been ob-
served before this. The tree infested with the scales was completely
covered with a small black ant, so much so that several could be count-
ed upon each of the scales at the same time. Upon examination only
two specimens of the Icerya were found to be parasitized by the Les-
tophonus, and these had already left. No doubt the abundance of the
ants upon the scales prevented the flies from ovipositing. I recom-
mended keeping the ants off the tree as the scales would then dis-
appear.
How often must the mother flies have been hovering over this young
tree in their attempt to lay eggs, and how many of them must have
been carried off as food for the young of the industrious ants! Mr.
Wurm also informed me that Icerya had been found by him upon the
roots of black grass. On examination, however, this proved to be an
entirely different coccid, Lecanium oleew, which had found its way to
this place in small colonies on olive-trees. The cut-worms had done
considerable damage to fruit-trees, grape-vines, and other vegetation
during November. Some of the apple-trees were completely stripped
of their foliage. Melolonthid larve had been very injurious to the
wheat crop by eating the roots.* The common grasshopper was also in
abundance here.t
On December 6, from four large specimens of Icerya that had been
inclosed, thirty-four flies (Lestophonus) and five parasites of the latter
had issued. J examined condition of Icerya on place from which last
sending was made, and from which nearly every one of the old and
infested scales had been removed, the trees at the time being full of
large Iceryas; yet at this date but very few of them were left, the coc-
cinellid larve and the Chrysopa in conjunction doing good work, eat-
ing, no doubt, the healthy as well as the infested scales. Some of them
had apparently gone through second molt, yet the greater part were
* Three species of Melolonthid beetles were collected at this point by Mr. Koebele,
and being unknown to our fauna were sent to Dr. Sharp, who has found them to be
Scitala nigrolineata Boisd., S. pruinosa Dalm., the third species representing a new
genus near Scitala.
t The same undetermined species referred to on p. 17.
20
still in the first stage. Only very small larve of the Lestophonus were
found within scales after first and second molts. Within a nearly fall-
grown specimen on trunk of lemon-tree, the only large one found there,
two larve of the fly were nearly full-grown.
I left on December 10 for Melbourne, seeing that it was necessary to
hunt up a new field. There I had hopes of gathering a sufficient quan-
tity for a shipment. The largest colony I was able to discover at Mel-
bourne existed in a church-yard on Collins street, upon small trees of
Pittosporum undulatum. Icould not find the proper person to apply to
for admittance, and a policeman whom I consulted in regard to getting
the tempting specimens advised me ‘‘not to jump from the fence as
they surely would have me arrested.”
T left them undisturbed and went in search of others. A few speci-
mens existed in the gardens of the government buildings; an occa-
sional specimen in the park adjoining the Exposition grounds ; some on
a: hedge in front of a hotel, and single specimens were found on trees
in a park at St. Kilda, while at the same place on a garden hedge quite
anumber were found; all these on Pittosporum undulatum and P. (engeni-
oides?). At the last-named place the lady-birds were found at work,
and all were gathered later for shipment. I went east of Melbourne as
far as Bairnsdale, yet no Icerya could be found. A strong attempt
was made to find out the whereabouts of the Monophleebids of which
Mr. Crawford had sent specimens to California. They could not be dis-
covered in numbers in the woods, yet in the parks at St. Kilda I was
soon rewarded. by finding the insects looked for, viz.: Monophlebus
crawfordi Maskell (Fig. 9), under loose bark of various Eucalypti, em-
bedded in cottony matter, and the single, (often 2 inches) long, white,
setous, anal hairs sticking out.* Only a few dozen of the monstrous
scales, however, could be gathered in a hard day’s work. Up in the tree-
tops I often found a similar Monophlebid, only varying in color some-
what. It is as large, or even larger, than M. crawfordi, and sits fast-
ened to the branches and exposed without any cottony attachments,
although sometimes under chips of bark.
On my way home in the evening one of these scales came hurriedly
running down on the trunk of a tree. So the next day, at the northern
park at Melbourne, the ground at the base of the Eucalypti was ex-
amined. Here I found, sometimes lying loose on top and dead (in this
case always destroyed by Lestophonus) and below ground to a depth of
3 inches, in a small cave nicely embedded in loose cottony matter if
healthy, or generally mixed up with the ground if parasitized, large
numbers of these scales. These, Mr. Coquillett informed me on my re-
turn to Los Angeles in April, gave the best results in Lestophonus, as
these parasites were still issuing then, four months after they were col-
*Not mentioned in the description of Monophlwbus crawfordi. See “On some New
South Australian Coccide,” by W. M. Maskell. (From the Transactions of the Royal
Society of South Australia 1888.)—A. K.
21
lected. I have counted as many as sixty-two holes in one of these
scales, showing what a number of parasites they are able to support. A
third species of these large Coccids was found attached to the roots and
base of Eucalyptus below ground, even larger than the two preceding.
About forty specimens of these produced no parasites. One specimen,
probably of this latter species, was found embedded under bark between
the forks of a very large Eucalyptus about 8 feet from the ground. This
measured fully 1 inch in length, and was about two-thirds as broad,
being nearly round.
Fic. 9.—Monophlebus crawfordi: a,female from above; 0, same from below—enlarged; c, antenna;
d, tarsus of same—still more enlarged (original).
I left for Sydney on the 24th to place the insects in an ice-house previ-
ous to shipment. In the meantime a letter had been received from Bris-
bane stating that Icerya occurred there occasionally in numbers, and
having had a letter from you in which you expressed the hope that I
would be able to visit Mr. Carl H. Hartmann, a correspondent of yours
at Toowoomba, who had found Icerya on his oranges in 1886, I started
for Queensland on December 29 and arrived at Toowoomba early on
January 1,1889, During the same day a full-grown female Icerya was
discovered in the woods about three miles from this place on Acacia
decurrens. During a search of several hours no other specimens were
found. I visited the Range nursery the following day and met the son
and the brother of Mr. Hartmann, who himself had died from the effects
22
of fever contracted while on a scientific trip to New Guinea. I also
met the man who had been employed at the time in 1886 when Mr. Hart-
mann received an illustration from Brisbane of Icerya,and directed him
to look over the trees for specimens, when several scales were found.
Since then, however, none have been found. While looking over the
lemon and orange trees I found oue single nearly full-grown specimen,
but aside from this no trace of them. A peculiar Coccid resembling
Iverya somewhat in structure was found on an apple-tree. The gentle-
man informed me that Icerya was always most noticeable in wet seasons,
but that it never appeared in such numbers as to be injurious.
I found here in abundance the large hemipterous insect so destruct-
ive to the orange in Queensland and New South Wales. A second
species somewhat smaller than this, yet equally mischievous, was found
at Adelaide (Fig. 10). Trees were observed at this place with all the
fruit and most of the young
shoots destroyed. Both spe- > e.
cies live and grow upon the S
sap of fruit and tender
twigs.* Aspidiotus aurantir
was present here in numbers “ome? RS
and also Lecanium olee, both
upon oranges; the latter,
however, is kept well in ——
check by a _ lepidopterous
Fic, 11.—Thalpochares cocciphaga—
slightly enlarged (original).
Fic. 10.— Mictis pro- ;
fana—natural size (Noctuid)larva, Thalpochares
Gosia). covciphaga, Meyrick (Fig. 11).
Several young orange trees had been completely cleaned by larve, and
eight chrysalids were found upon a young plant. Mr. H. Hartmann
also informed me that near Brisbane a dipterous larva existed which
occasionally destroyed all the orange crops, and in 1886, which was a
very wet season, a dipterous larva destroyed not only all the oranges
but also nearly all the other fruits, even the apples and pears. He also
gave me the following list as blight-proof apple-trees: ‘Northern Spy,
Majetin, Irish Peach, Streaked Peach, Hartmann’s Seedlings Nos. 1 and
5, New England Pigeon, Shepherd’s Perfection, Chubb’s Seedling, Can-
vade, Flushed Peach.”
On January 5, having obtained free passes for the Queensland rail-
ways, I left Toowoomba for Brisbane. On my arrival at the hotel I met
with specimens of Icerya on an ornamental plant in the passage-way.
This and a few other specimens found in gardens through the city were
all I could find, yet in damp seasons they occur sometimes in numbers,
as I learned from several gentlemen acquainted with the insect.
Mr. Henry Tryon, assistant curator of the Museum, kindly introduced
me to several persons in Brisbane. He himself was about to publish a
*The second of these insects is Mictis profana Fabr., and the other is a species of
Aspongopus.
23
paper on Icerya and its parasites, of which he has shown mea small Chal-
cid of which he bred several specimens from Icerya inclosed in paper
box, saying it was a true parasite.* I bred this same insect from a few
Specimens of an Icerya sent to me by Dr. Bancroft, of Brisbane, as feed-
ing upon mangrove tree (Avicennia officinalis, Linn.). This seale dif-
fers in coloration from the true J. purchasi and may prove to be a new
species. Mr. Maskell, to whom the insect was shown, thinks it only a
variety. It would be an interesting one, however, for of all the J.
purchasi that I have seen, none show such a uniform bright yellow
color. No specimens found on mangrove at Auckland show such
bright yellow color. Mr. Tryon is of the opinion that Icerya originated
in China, from the fact that nearly all specimens he found at Brisbane
wereupon plants from that country. Dr. Bancroft, in his paper on
Coccide (Philosophical Society of Queensland, vol. 1, August, 1869),
referred to the then undescribed Icerya, and at that time, ashe assured
me, he had been acquainted with the insect for several years. The
doctor further mentioned the occurrence of a scale on the sugar-cane
in Queensland living on the roots of the young plants, and as these be-
came larger, behind the leaves. It had been imported with the canes
from Mauritius. He promised to secure specimens for me. No doubt
this will prove to be J. sacchari.t
In the woods around Brisbane but few Coccids were found during my
brief stay. The white waxy scale (Ceroplastes) so abundant on various
plants in cultivation was here observed in large numbers upon a small
shrub. Of the Monophlebus, which I had been informed was almost
always numerous around Brisbane, only an occasional specimen could
be found. Everything was so extremely dry that I gave up my in-
tended trip by steamer further north, and as there was little prospect
of obtaining sufficient material for a shipment at this place, I returned
slowiy towards Melbourne, making occasional stops along the road, yet
without discovering any Icerya. At Melbourne I was fortunate in finding
many more of the Monophlebus. On a few trees, under the bark, they
occurred by the dozens, often many together, but they were all dried up
and the flies had left sometime previous. Those in ground were still
in good condition. A large number of them had deposited their eggs
and were shriveled up, yet during the two days a fair number were found
parasitized. At Sydney, January 21 to 23, a number of Iceryas with
parasites, and probably two hundred or more of the Lady-birds in all
*Mr. Tryon has recently published in a pamphlet entitled ‘Report on Insect and
Fungus Pests, No. 1,” a general description of this parasite, but without attempt to
name or properly place it. From the description it seems to be identical with a true
parasite of Icerya, which we -have received from Mr. Crawford, and which we have
characterized, since the above was in type, as Ophelosia crawfordi, n. g., 1. sp.
t We find among Mr. Koebele’s Brisbane material a small Coccinellid not here re-
ferred to, but which is labeled ‘‘feeding on Icerya.” Dr. Sharp, to whom we sent a
specimen, determines it as Cryptolemus montrouzieri Muls.
24
stages, were collected, most of them in the Town Hall garden. I found
here also feeding upon the Seales a few specimens of a small Seymnus
in all its stages which were inclosed.* The first brood of Iceryas im
warm and exposed places at Sydney had by this time become nearly
grown, some of them beginning to exude cottony matter, while others
in more secluded spots were quite small. The isolated acacia tree, so
full of Icerya in September, had become entirely clear, nothing but a
few old and torn egg-masses being visible. With this I finished col-
lecting the parasites and enemies of Icerya in Australia, as from letters.
received from Mr. Crawford, at Adelaide, dated January 11 and 12, there
was little hope of obtaining sufficient materiai at that place for another
consignment, nor would it have paid to search for Monophlebus in the ,
ground, as at the time they could not be found in large numbers in the
woods. Moreover, many of their parasites had already left, while the
Icerya still known to me at Melbourne and Sydney were not sufficient
to make a good shipment.
A letter received at this time from you in which you directed me to
visit New Zealand and study Icerya there until the arrival of the next
steamer for San Francisco, in case the exposition commission would pay
expenses, was Shown to Hon. Frank McCoppin, who at once consented to
my proposed trip. I therefore left Sydney on the steamer of January 23
with some hope of clearing up the mysterious disappearance of Icerya
in New Zealand. Arrived at Auckland on the 28th, the Scales with
parasites and Lady-birds were repacked from tin into wooden boxes, and
were found in excellent condition. Everything within the tin boxes had
_the appearance of being placed there only a few hours previous. There
was no indication of any mold. Some fresh Iceryas found in a private
garden at Auckland, on Acacia decurrens, were inclosed as food for the
Lady-bird larve. These latter Seales were in a small colony all close
together ou a few small branches, and numbered about eight hundred
specimens. No insects preying upon them were found. At the United
States consulate a letter was found awaiting me from Mr. R. Allan
Wight, dated October 10, 1888, in which the writer mentioned various
localities infested with Icerya, wishing me to visit Hawke’s Bay, at
Napier, where the Seales were still numerous, although fast disappear-
ing, and where a good field for observation would be open. I therefore
left Auckland on January 30, overland, the New Zealand Government,
through our consul, having furnished me with a free pass for four
months. On this trip not many observations could be made.
The Cabbage Aphis was found in large numbers all over the northern
island of New Zealand as wellasin Australia. A Coccinellid was found
subsequently at Napier feeding upon this Aphis in large numbers. It
is described by Mr. W. Colenso as C. nova-zealandica (Fig. 12). About
tifty specimens of these were collected and placed in empty pill-boxes. Of
these twenty-one were still living on my arrival at Alameda, where they
ing to a new species of a new genus.
25
small numbers; this is C0. tasmanii (Fig. 13). The Cabbage Plutella (Plu-
tella cruciferarum Zell.) was here as well as all over Australia, observed
tobe very abundant. Mr. French, of Melbourne, had a specimen on exhi-
bition with the name of *‘ Plusia crucifera” as injurious tocabbage. The
small Tineid, so destructive to potatoes in California, and no doubt
already distributed over the most of the Western States, has been known
in New Zealand for years, and it is doing the same mischief all over
Australia, where it originated. In conversation with a merchant from
Denver, Colo., recently, he said that a year ago he received three car-
loads of California potatoes, infested with these worms to such a de.
gree that they could not be sold. I also met here, wherever apples are
grown, with what is probably Uytilaspis pomorum Bouché, the species
previously referred to as such.
Fic. 12.— Coccinella nova-zealandica, larva and adult— Fic. 13.—Cocecinella tasmanit,
enlarged (original). adult—enlarged (original).
Mr. A. Hamilton, curator of the museum at Napier, who had been
informed by Mr. Wight of my intended trip, awaited me and at once
showed me a number of infested Acacia trees. Icerya was here still in
countless numbers. Before breakfast the next morning this gentleman
showed me one of the Australian Lady-birds,* saying that he found it
among Icerya. On investigation they were found in large numbers in
every place visited at Napier and several miles out in the country. I
left Napier for Wellington on the 11th to visit Mr. Maskell. This gen-
tleman had never had the opportunity of studying the enemies of Icerya,
as the scales are not found anywhere within 80 miles of Wellington. It
had been the firm belief of some persons in New Zealand that certain
Ichneumonids were the destroyers of the Seales. I saw dozens of sev-
eral species of these upon one orange tree infested with Icerya near
Napier, not injuring them in any way, but devouring the sweet exuda-
tion from them. Larger numbers of flies were present than Ichneu-
monide, and even Crambide were engaged in the same perform-
ance, yet these received no sbare in the compliments. Mr. Maskell had
received from the Cape of Good Hope about two hundred specimens
of several species of Coccinellids, which, as the sender informed him,
* Vedalia cardinalis Muls.
26
were all preying upon Icerya. They were sent to Nelson and placed
under tent with the Scales. A few days later, how-
ever, the wind took away the tent and nothing more
has been seen since of the Coccinellids. Several
species of these beetles which Mr. Maskell kindly
presented me with were left with you at Washington.
Amongst them I could not find the Rodolia icerye,
; ~=5 Janson (Fig. 14), which is destroying the Scales at the
Fig. 14 —Rodolia icer- e : é
ye—enlarged (after Cape and, with the possible exception of one species,
Huley). I do not think they will feed upon Icerya.
My time was too short to visit Nelson, and Mr. Maskell kindly promised
to secure for me a box full of scales from that district, so as to enable
me to find out whether some parasites or enemies existed there. This
box was sent to me on board the steamer at Auckland and, on opening
the same, several flies were found that had issued en route. Only one
of them was in perfect condition ; all the others were crippled. They
had crawled in among the paper used in making up the parcel. No
other specimens were bred and no holes were observed in the scales, so
the only possibility remains in the larva of this fly being predaceous
upon the eggs of Icerya. Apart from these flies no other insects were
observed from the Nelson Scales. On my return to Napier I got at once
to work gathering the Coccinellids in all stages. They were in such
numbers that I found it not very difficult to collect here about six
thousand specimens during the three days (February 14 to 16). As
many as eight eggs of the Lady-bird were observed on the upper side
of the female Icerya just beginning to exude cottony matter. Oppo-
site to this on the small branch of Acacia, five young larve of the
Lady-bird were feeding on the under side of a half-grown scale; in one
instance even nine Coccinellid larve were found attached to a small
Icerya. The mature beetles were not numerous,
but every branch full of scales had a greater or
less number of eggs and larve. The eggs are
chiefly deposited among the vigorous half-grown
scales. Here the largest number of the eggs and
young larve were found. They are generally
single, thrust in between the scales and fastened
onto the branch, on the scale itself, and often on
the under side of the scale, as the mother Lady-
I bird will sometimes raise the Icerya with her hind
Fig. 15.—Scymnus fagus—en- legs and thrust the egg under it. At times two
Eeees enelna or more are found together, always lying flat and
in irregular position. Aside from this valuable Coccinellid, a small
Seymnus was observed here feeding upon the scales, but in small num-
bers only. This was named for me later by Captain Broun, as Scymnus
Jagus (Fig. 15).
I left Napier with my valuable lot of Lady-birds on the 17th. They
27
were placed in the ice-house on the steamer, and as soon as Auckland
was reached I went to the freezing-house and there my Coccinellids were
placed in a cool room with a temperature of 38° Fah. Having been
informed that Iceryas had been very numerous almost a year ago at a
gentleman’s place near Lake Togabuna, several miles out of Auckland,
a trip was made as soon as my Lady-birds were safe, for I was very
anxious to get at the fact as to what had destroyed the Scales around Auck-
land, and if it were not the same insect found at Napier. I was shown
a couple of Acacia trees, one of which had been destroyed by the Scales,
and a second, still living, which had many Iceryas upon it. All the
Seales on this small tree were examined, and, with the exception of a
small Coleopterous larva within one of the egg-masses, no enemies could
be observed. Both these trees were growing among old pine trees and
were much shaded by them, in fact so much so that no sun-Joving in-
sect like the Lady-bird would venture into then. Close by about a
dozen orange trees were growing in an open field, and on my inquiring
if no Scales were upon these trees, the gentleman remarked that only
about nine months since they were full of them, but that all had disap-
peared. These I wanted to see, and on the first tree reached, while
yet at some distance, I could see, exposed to the sun on the upper side
of a leaf, a black glistening spot, which was the insect looked for, the
Australian Lady-bird. On this tree more Coccinellids than Iceryas were
found. The Lady-birds, if not at rest on top of a leaf in the hot sun,
were busily running or flying about. This is an interesting fact. All
the orange trees in the open field were completely cleaned of the thou-
sands of Scales by the Coccinellids, while closely adjoining, among the
dark and shady pines (Pinus insignis Douglas), a large Acacia tree
(Acacia decurrens) was destroyed by the Scales, even the adjoining
branches of the pine trees being dead, and, as stated by the proprietor,
from the effects of Icerya.
As yet the scales have not been observed to my knowledge on pine
trees in California, yet Mr. Maskell also told me of having seen pine
trees loaded with them. I observed here also an Aspidiotus very in-
jurious to apple trees. The following day the place visited on my
first arrival in Auckland was examined again, but only a few large
females could be found. The young were just hatching, and many
eggs were still present. Mr. Cheeseman had been informed by Mr.
Purchas and others that Icerya existed abundantly in the woods at the
English church cemetery (Paeroa), infesting Sophora tetraptera. He
kindly accompanied me to the place, and before long pointed out the
tree, which is closely related to the Acacias. We soon succeeded in
finding the scales in large numbers on a few of the trees, when a care-
ful investigation was made and a few specimens of the small Scymnus
Jagus were found. A small hemipterous insect was present among the
ege-masses in all stages, the young being found within them, and two
species of small spiders had built their houses among the egg-masses
28
also. From the many remains of the young Iceryas it was evident that
they fed also on these. The Australian Coccinellid had not yet discov-
ered this colony of scales, yet it must have existed here in numbers
for at least four years. Only a few scattered specimens were found
on other shrubs, but they had spread to the Mangrove bushes growing
close by in large numbers. On this plant they thrive remarkably well.
Captain Broun, at Drury, the authority on New Zealand Coleoptera,
was visited:and asked in regard to the Australian Lady-bird. He did
not know the insect, nor had he ever met with it, but he had the small
Scymnus fagus, which seems to be more widely spread and lives upon
various Scales ; neither had he met with the common C. nova-zealandica
which I found at Napier. During a ramble in the woods with the cap-
tain I found a large Coccinellid in all stages feeding upon Ctenochiton
viridis Maskell infesting Coprosma lucida. This Coccinellid was identi-
fied by him as Leis antipodum Mulsant (Fig. 16). Upon the same tree was
also found in abundance a second and smaller Scale of the same genus;
this is C. perforatus. The captain kindly promised to send me a number
of living specimens of the Coccinellid, and he kept his promise, though,
unfortunately, the insect had become so rare that with assistance he
was able to find only six specimens. These came in an ice-chamber well
packed in a large box, but only one of them was living on arrival here.
=e MS
Fic. 16.—Leis antipodum, two varieties—enlarged (original.)
On February 25 the steamer was ready to sail. Having made ar-
rangements with the butcher on board the previous day as to the most ~
convenient time of receiving my insects into the ice-house, they were
transferred from the freezing-house on board the steamer, which did
not take more than ten minutes, and the insects were not disturbed in
their dormant stage during the time. Every day on the voyage I re-
ceived the answer from the butcher, to my inquiries about the parcel,
‘“ Your bugs are all right.” On March 10, after leaving Honolulu, one
of the boxes with the Lady-bird larve was examined and found in ex-
cellent condition; no dead larve could be found among them, and this
was twenty-four days after the first were collected. On Saturday eve-
ning, March 16, we arrived at San Francisco, too late to have the in-
sects forwarded, and I could not send them off before Monday evening,
March 18. They were probably received and opened by Mr. Coquillett
two days later. This would make thirty-four days that they were in-
29
closed, and yet they arrived in excellent condition, better than any pre-
viously received. Haviug been on ice for twenty-nine days, no doubt
many of the eggs arrived here before hatching, and the larvee under
such conditions would make little progress in their growth.
As will be seen from these notes (and such is my firm belief), Icerya
is indigenous to Australia, having spread from that country to the Cape
of Good Hope, New Zealand, and our continent, and no doubt with some
plants brought here. The pursers on steamers running between San
Francisco and Sydney informed me that with every trip a greater or
less number of plants are brought over. On these no one would notice
Icerya; even an expert would overlook a few of the tiny young scales
if not especially searching for them. At the time Icerya was first ob-
served here many oranges were brought over. Mr. Sutton, of the
Alameda, informed me that in 1873 the entire market in San Francisco
was supplied with Australian oranges. All this matters little. We
have the pest, and now the most effective enemies of it. Before long
the work of the latter will be appreciated all over the State. At this
date small colonies of the Lady-birds have been established in almost
every district infested with Icerya, and at Los Angeles they must be
present already by the thousands.
It was difficult in Australia to ascertain which was the most effect-
ive enemy of Icerya, on account of the scarcity of the latter insect dur-
ing the unusually dry season of my visit. It is safe to say, however,
that the Lestophonids are always and at any time ready for any Icerya,
since they breed upon so many and varied Scales infesting the Euca-
lypti and Acacias, of which the Australian woods chiefly consist.
Often Icerya will appear m large numbers in some private garden in a
city, and yet, as I have been informed, they will be out of sight in a
short time again. This entire clearing up is the work of the Lady-
birds, for in most cases the infested scales will produce eggs, and the
flies are never able to entirely clear a tree of them, in which case t. e
Lady-bird steps in and devours Scales, flies, and all. It is only in such
protected places that the scales sometimes become numerous, as it
takes time for their enemies to establish themselves. The Lestophonus
no doubt would in time increase here so as to keep the Icerya in check,
but this would be years, for only two broods of it were observed in
Australia, as many as that of its host, the Icerya, the parasite appear-
ing about the same time as the young of the latter. I have seen about
eight species of Monophlcebide upon which Lestophonus will undoubt-
edly breed.
Dr. Diez, of the Adelaide Museum, has shown me several specimens
of a species of these scales, which he assures me were fully 2 inches in
length when received alive from the interior of South Australia. He
~ had written to the party who sent them for information regarding the
monstrous scale-bug, yet the only light he received upon the subject
was that the discoverer of the Scale was found dead in the bush near
30
Barvota, and he assumes that they Came from that district. Such a
large Coccid would be able to support several hundred of the Lesto-
phonus. I have also bred this fly from a species of Celostoma found
on a shrub at Mount Lofty, South Australia, where two specimens of -
Icerya were found, both invested by Lestophonus on a species of Acacia.
In California we have to my knowledge no Seales upon which this fly
would breed, with the exception of Pulvinaria and Dactylopius. Of the
latter there are many species found almost everywhere; a large species
almost equal in size to Icerya exists upon our Redwood trees (Sequoia).
This no doubt willin time be attacked by the flies. I have not the least
doubt that in time this Lestophonus will do effective work upon Icerya
even if slow (too slow for the Americans, as Mr. Wolfskill remarked).
So far I have seen little progress of it. On my visit to Los Angeles (April
12), it seemed that very few remained of the vast number of flies re-
ceived here in good condition. AJl had been placed under one tent,
erected over a tree for the purpose of propagating, instead of forming
a new colony with every consignment received; yet it is to be hoped
that very many of the flies have escaped from the tent.
As far as the Lady-bird is concerned it will show itself, or rather has
done so already. They never were found by the writer except feeding
upon Icerya, and yet there must surely exist in Australia some other
scales upon which they feed. The work this little insect is able to accoin-
plish is shown by the fact that by chance it went over to Auckland, New
Zealand, where the Icerya was in a flourishing state, having destrored
nearly everything about five years or so since, and there cleared nearly
the whole district around Anckland within about two years. From here
it has spread south as far as Hawk’s Bay without any artificial help,
everywhere increasing in numbers as long as the food would last. I
shall be greatly mistaken if this one insect alone is not master of the
situation within two years’ time, although we have comparatively few
to battle with. It will need thousands everywhere to clean up the mill-
ions of scales. I has no time while in the field to study much of the
life-history of this valuable insect. My first motto was always ‘get as
many as possible.” If once established here, the life history may be
studied at leisure.
I will, however, relate part of the doings of one pair of these insects.
On February 9 a few beetles and pup were collected in a glass jar.
Two male Lady-birds were noticed running and pushing around one of
the pup in which one of the female Lady-birds had just issued and
was within thecase with soft and tender wings and about helpless. Soon
the male succeeded in pushing her out, and immediately after this had
been accomplished, one of them united with her at about3 p.m. This
pair were placed in a small wooden box and they remained in copula
until the following morning at 7. They were left in this box until
February 17, when they were placed in a large jar with twigs of Acacia
fullofIceryas. Noeggs were observed in the box, which was completely
dl
clean, with the exception of the numerous red spots produced by the
Lady-bird, for they had subsisted on their owneggs during their confine-
ment. As soon as the female Lady-bird was among the scales she be-
came quiet, stopped, and deposited an egg upon the twig. As soon as
this was done she turned around and devoured the same, which took
her about a half a minute. A few moments were spent in cleaning her-
self and then another egg was brought forth and eaten. After this and
another wash she attacked and devoured a half-grown scale. This was
eaten into from the back, very quietly at first, yet in a little time she
became lively, almost furious, tearing the scale off from its hold by the
beak and turning it up and down in the air with the mouth-parts, as-
sisting in this with the anterior legs. In about one minute this was.
devoured and nothing but the empty skin left, after which she went to
work, business-like, and deposited eggs quietly, sitting at rest upon the
scales, and every few minutes thrusting an egg in between or generally
under them. A very large scale was lifted with the posterior legs and
the egg thrust beneath. All the strong attempts at love affairs by the
lively and not hungry male were resisted. I was careful to see that
twigs with nothing but Icerya on them were selected for food; at least
no young larve could be observed on them; yet the second day after
the Coccinellids were placed in with them, young larvze were seen, and
they came out so fast that within a few days my jar was a living mass.
of them.
On February 22 a few of the larve were full grown and settled down
in a quiet place, fastening the ends of their bodies down with a thick
and sticky substance and remaining in this way, becoming shorter and
stouter, for four days. On the 25th the first pupa was observed; from
this the mature beetle hatched in the evening of the 28th. Another
appeared the following day. Again, on March 3, a pair of the bred
Lady-birds were placed together, with clean food, and the next day,
March 4, eggs were observed which hatched on the 8th. This I could
not carry through, as the food began to dry up; in fact, on March 18,
many grown and hungry larvie were devouring each other in this jar,
and even the mother of them, which was still living, was noticed devour-
ing one of her young, a larva. Three times, at intervals, this pair were
observed in copulation. Eleven beetles of this last brood reached matu-
rity, having had nothing to feed upon but one supply of scales that
had already been boxed up for eight days, the beetles having been born
and forced to live upon one another. Taking four days for the eggs to
hatch, about eight days for the larve to grow, three days until pupa-
ting, and four days more for the pupa to emerge, this would only make
nineteen days from the egg tothe mature insect, providing the weather
is warm. No doubt we will see cases where, in less time than this,
all the stages are gone through at Los Angeles in hot weather, and we
may expect at least fifteen broods annually of this insect to two of
Icerya.
32
Another most important insect is the moth Thalpochares cocciphaga
Meyrick. It is greatly to be hoped that this insect will be introduced
here. I have been able to get about a hundred larve here in good con-
dition, yet what became of them I am not able to state as yet. The
insect is apparently easy to breed. Five of the larve were placed in a
pill-box in the field during January and overlooked. During April, on
opening the box at Alameda, I found that four of the moths had issued,
copulated, and deposited many eggs. The young larve, however, had
already left the box and no trace of them could be found. It would
have been easy with the number received here, had a little care been
bestowed upon them, to breed and introduce them upon most any of
our larger Scales.
The Chrysopa, of which eggs and larvee were sent over with every
shipment, excepting the last, have been successfully introduced. In
April, while in Los Angeles, several of the insects were noticed upon
orange trees in Mr. Wolfskill’s orchard.
Several species of Scymnus, about six in number, that were sent, all
live upon Coccide. The largest of them was abundantin Brisbane upon
various soft scales, and was also found at this place upon Icerya.
Mr. Webster brought to me from Tasmania a box full of Eucalyptus
twigs with Hriococcus eucalypt, the Scymnus so numerous at Melbourne,
and sent here in numbers, together with two small moths, a Pyralid and
a Tineid, which were feeding upon the Hriococcus.* These, as all other
insects, were turned over to Mr. Coquillett. Various other beneficial
insects were observed during my four months’ work in Australia, all of
which if introduced here would be of great value. One of these de-
serves to be mentioned. It is one of the largest Lady-birds, and had
cleaned whole apple orchards of the Woolly Aphis in South Australia
aud Victoria. They were also observed to feed upon Lecanium.
All material collected and studied in Australia relating to this sub-
ject and otherwise of importance will be mounted and sent to you with
the notes thereon.
* These moths we have no means of now determining, even if described. The
Tineid much resembles Euclemensia bassettella of this country, and the other is a Phy-
cid near Dakruma.
fo)
63 0, af $ |
Woo OEP ART MENT ORJMAGRICULTURE: i
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY. ,
BULLETIN. No, 22.
ey Eee OR ES
OF
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
THE PRACTICAL WORK OF THE DIVISION,
MADE
UNDER THE DIRECTION GF THE ENTOMOLOGIST.
(PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.)
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1890.
epson nine
~ ar a
i DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY..
BULLETIN No. 22.
Roe Ok TS
OF
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
IN
THE PRACTICAL WORK OF THE DIVISION,
MADE
_ UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST.
(PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.)
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1890.
Ty ;
i be ay ; tag
; haa! , :
PX
ges
CONTENTS.
MESA OVDS ER OSETO Ne or ee aio one oe arcs eo cae eae cle sa Seo eed ae a minalses eee.
REPORT ON VARIOUS METHODS FOR DESTROYING THE RED SCALE OF CALI-
TORS aSnGn Beeso be pcoce JASE eRe Bae Saee haere reEpotoon D. W. Coquillett. -
REPORT ON INSECTS OF THE SEASON IN IOWA ...----.------ Herbert Osborn..
REPORT ON OBSERVATIONS UPON INSECTS AFFECTING GRAINS.F. M. Webster...
ENTOMOLOGICAL NOTES FROM MISSOURI FOR THE SEASON 189, Mary E. Murt-
CT > RES TANS 4 Bek ial St thee ese epee ee ere fe EL 0
MMBORT ON CATE ORNIA UNSECTS)..2.+< socceeaces -osc-s ss 5955 Albert Koebele. .
REPORT ON NEBRASKA INSECTS ..---.-- Seerest itis sis Serato Lawrence Bruner. -
9
oO
Page.
Aiea Weve
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., January —, 1890.
Str: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 22 of
this Division. Owing to the necessities of the case I was able to include
in the annual report only a general summary of the work of the field
agents of the Division, reserving their full reports on the work of the
year for subsequent publication. They are, therefore, here presented.
Respectfully, ear
. V. RILEY
Entomologist.
Hon. J. M. Rusk,
Secretary of Agriculture.
5
*
©
=
ular 5 2 Se
INTRODUCTION.
This bulletin comprises the reports of the field agents of the Division
of Entomology which were necessarily omitted from the annual report,
in which it has been our previous custom to publish some or all of
them. .
Mr. Coquillett has reported upon several phases of his work, and we
print here only the portion relating to the experiments which he made
in the destruction of the Red Scale of California (Aspidiotus [Aonidia]
aurantit Maskell) by the use of washes. - ess -- oe eee en eee eee eee . 30
Total scccen sepccnecee ceo eeee et ee ee eye eee eae eee eee 100. 00
Samples drawn at experiment station from full sacks, special care being taken to
insure fair samples. Neither of these samples contain an appreciable amount of
phosphoric acid, potash, or nitrogen,
j
51
collecting material for experimentation, in a field seriously damaged by
grubs, we found a hill of corn, which, though it contained none of the
depredators, bore every evidence of having been destroyed by them,
as other hills in a similar condition about it contained from 5 to 10 in-
dividuals. Instead, however, a larva of a species of Hrav, near bastard,
was found. As the larvee of Hrax are known to be carnivorous, we can
only conclude that the one found had made way with the grubs, but
not until after the latter had destroyed the corn.
THE VARYING ANOMALA.
(Anomala varians, Fabr.).
The only record of this species, as a grain destroying insect occurs in
the report of the Commissioner of Agriculture for 1884, p. 412, where
Mr. Eugene F. Barns, of Marion, Marion County, Kans., reported the
beetle as working serious damage to wheat in the field during the month
of June, destroying 1,000 bushels for one farmer.
These beetles oceur generally over the State of Indiana, and we have
frequently met them hovering on heads of wheat in the field, but never
remarked any serious injury. In this State the adult insects are preyed
upon by one of the Asilidew, Laphria tergissa Say, and we have several
times caught these flies on wing with one of the beetles in their clutches,
their beak puncturing the body of their victim.
THE WHEAT WIRE-WORM.
(Agriotes mancus, Say.)
A number of experiments were made with a view of learning the
effect of the applications of salt, as against the larvee of this species.
The method employed was to place a number of kernels of corn in
earthen pots, and transport larve from the fields, where they were en-
gaged in destroying wheat, placing them among the corn in these pots,
the salt being applied in different quantities to the surface of the ground. |
Experiment No. 1.—April 26, six kernels of corn, and two wire-worms
nearly full grown, were placed together in a pot filled with earth, the
latter being saturated with water from beneath. Common barrel salt
was then applied to the surface of the soil, at the rate of 940 pounds
to the acre. May 1, watered from above.
Result, the pot was examined May 7, and both worms found unaf-
fected, they having in the meantime eaten nearly all of the corn, the
uninjured kernels failing to germinate.
Experiment No. 2.—This was made at the same time as No. 1, all con.
ditions being the same, except that salt was applied at the rate of 470
pounds per acre.
Result the same as in experiment No. 1.
Experiment No. 3.—May 7, placed three of the larvie used in the pre-
ceding experiments and one fresh from the field, with corn in pot of
earth, saturating the latter from below, and covering surface with salt
in the proportion of 24,500 pounds per acre,
52
Ntesult five days later; the worms were alive and as active as they
ever were. Corn slightly eaten, but none showing any indication of
growing, while kernels from same ear planted in unsalted soil were
sprouted. The corn used in all experiments was from the same ear.
Drasterius elegans Fab.
The larva of this species has been mentioned in my previous reports
as destroying other insects, and themselves injuring young corn. In
the present instance they were found exceedingly abundant, on Novem-
ber 15, near New Castle, Ind., where they were evidently working seri,
ous injury to a field of young wheat, sown in growing corn about Sep-
tember 5. This field had produced three consecutive crops of wheat-
then the present crop of corn, among which the young wheat was grow-
ing. It was true the wheat was seriously infested by Hessian fly, and
therefore the question may arise as to whether the worms were not de-
stroying these; but the damage to the field was by far too great to
have been done by the fly alone, and many of the plants had been eaten
off below the ground.
With this new revelation regarding their food habits, it seems prob-
able that a part of the wire-worm injuries to wheat sown among corn
may be due to this species, instead of the preceding.
THE TWELVE-SPOTTED DIABROTICA.
(Diabrotica 12-punctata.)
The adults of this species have been observed in greater abundance
than ever before. Gardens and fields have been literally overrun with
them. The sexes were observed pairing as early as the 17th of April,
thereby promising larvee sufficiently early to attack young corn, even
though pianted at the usual time. The list of food plants has this sea-
son been observed to include the following, not previously reported :
Wheat, cabbage, cauliflower, and beans; an adult was also observed
feeding on volunteer oats Deceinber 14.
THE SWAMP SPHENOPHORUS.
(Sphenophorus ochreus Lec. )
Few insects afford a better illustration of the fact that a comparatively
harmless species may, by force of circumstances, suddenly become ex-
tremely injurious. Known to the entomologist since 1858, and by no
means a rare insect, its habits unstudied because of its secluded haunts
and valueless food plant, the species appears to have been overtaken by
this progressive decade in agriculture.
The swamp composing the field which formed the basis of the study
of this insect was brokén up some thirty years ago and two crops of
corn raised on it without damage from insect attack, after which, by
reason of being too wet, it was allowed to revert back to its original
state. Fifteen years ago a second attempt was made to bring it into
cultivation, and a single crop of corn raised from a portion of it, this
time the insects being noticed, but doing no material injury. The land
5)
53
was again allowed to go back to its primitive state, and remained thus
until last season, when, after being drained, a portion was broken and the
remainder brought into cultivation the spring of the present year, with
the results here given.
Other fields of swamp jand, in the same neighborhood, have suffered
in the same manner as this one, but there is at present no information
of serious damage until within the last three or four years.
The first published notice of the destructive habits of these insects is
found in a brief notice which appeared in several agricultural papers
during July, 1888, to the effect that Professor
Forbes had found them to be very destructive
to corn planted on recently drained swamp
lands in Illinois, the adult feeding upon a spe-
cies of rush (Scirpus) and a common reed (Phrag-
mites), and when these were destroyed they
transferred their attention to the young corn.
On May 23, adult beetles were
sent me by Mr. Quincey farl, a far-
mer residing near Dayton, Ind., a
small village about 8 miles from
La Fayette, with the statement
that they were destroying his corn.
The beetles were at once con-
fined with corn plants growing in
flower pots, the males proceeding
to bury their snouts into the ten- Fic. 1.—Sphenophorus oehreus: a. larva; b, adult—
der stems, near the surface of the sie pa wee
soil; but the females, to my utter astonishment, burrowed down into
the earth, out of sight, and staid there.
Stormy weather prevented my visiting the locality until June 2. The
infested field comprised about 75 acres of recently drained swamp land,
plowed the present spring, except a small portion which had been de-
voted to corn the previous year, and the first avd second planting de-
stroyed by the beetles. On that portion of the field plowed this spring
the young corn was not yet up, but on that portion which had been cul-
tivated last year and planted earlier this year than the newer-plowed
portion, the young plants had been totally destroyed, the lack of their
natural food having evidently driven the insects to this part of the field,
as other fields in the vicinity had not suffered the second year after the
ground was first broken, although the first crop had been destroyed.
At the time of my visit the beetles were feeding on a species of rush,
Scirpus atrovirens, Muhl., puncturing the stems just below the surface
of the ground and eating out the tender, folded leaves. The sexes were
pairing, but I could get no eggs. A large number of adults of both
sexes were taken home, as also were specimens of the Scirpus, including
the roots, which are bulbous and exceedingly hard and compact. These
plants were placed in flower-pots, and on each was placed a single pair
54
of adults. The next day the males were engaged either in pairing or
feeding upon the Scirpus, but the females, when not paired with the
males, had burrowed down into the earth, out of sight.
On a second visit to the infested field, June 11, but few females were
to be found above ground. The young corn was coming up well, but
being rapidly destroyed by the males and a few females, except where
Scirpus was growing in sufficient abundance to provide an ample sup-
ply of food.
Absence from home, from the middle of June until the middle of July,
not only interrupted my observations, but a press of other work pre-
vented my visiting the field again until August 21, both plants and
beetles in pots having in the mean time died.
As aresult of this last visit I found two adults, one of which was feed-
ing on a small dwarfed stalk of corn and the other on Scirpus atrovirens.
An examination of the root of this reed re-
vealed full-grown larve (Fig. 1, a) and fully
developed adults still within the bulbs. Other
bulbous roots of the same plant gave evi-
dence that the adult had only recently quitted
its birthplace. Hurrying home, my plants in
the flower pots, long ago dead, dried up and,
as I thought, worthless, were examined and
in nearly every one was found a fully devel-
oped adult, none of which had escaped from
the bulbous roots wherein they had devel-
oped. (Fig. 2.)
Still another visit to this field on August
30 confirmed all previous observations, and
a Single pupa was also found in a bulb of the
Scirpus.
From what is known of the habits of other
species of this- genus, coupled with the fact
Fic. 2.—Work of Sphenophorus that fields of. corn are not attacked by the
ochreus in roots of Scirpus—nat- heetles after the first year following the
er breaking of the ground, it seems highly im-
probable that there should be more than one annual brood. This being
the case, its life history will likely be as follows: The insect hibernates
in the adult stage, coming forth from its hiding places in spring, the
females depositing their eggs during May and June in the roots of
Scirpus. The larve hatching from these develop to adults and emerge
in about three months.
From the vast differences existing between the plant in which the
species breeds and that of the corn plant, the great improbability of
the insect ever breeding in corn wiil at once be seen. The whole prob-
lem of prevention seems to settle in the destruction of these reeds,
root and stem, the season prior to devoting the ground to corn. The
eggs are as a rule deposited in bulbs formed the preceding year, and
ee.
55
we have found healthy adults in bulbs after the latter had been thrown
out by the plow and lain in the sun for over a month. We have also
found them developing in bulbs in ground plowed in May and again
in July, indicating that little or nothing can be accomplished by sum
mer fallow.
The most practical and probably the most effective method of destroy-
ing the food plant of the pest is to sow rye or some other crop on the
land the first season after breaking.
THE CHINCH BUG.
; (Blissus leucopterus Say.)
The history and distribution of the Chinch Bug in Indiana offers
some problems not only very perplexing but exceedingly difficult to
solve. In fact, we shall here make no attempt toward a solution, but
rather to separate a few of the many complex elements which are
thought to influence the distribution and numbers of the pest, and to
some extent at least indicate how far they may be considered or per-
haps eliminated entirely from any independent relation to the subject,
thereby affording aid to the future investigator.
It is well known that although Thomas Say, at the time he described
the species, was residing at New Harmony, Indiana, nevertheless his
description was drawn from a single specimen taken by himself on the
Eastern Shore of Virginia, and so far as we know he may have died
ignorant of its occurrence in his own or any of the adjoining States.
Recently, Professor Forbes has collected some data showing that the
species was destructively abundant in Edwards County, Illinois, as
early as 1828, and was also observed in Richland County in 1823.
Strictly in accordance with the above, while that portion of Illinois
lying adjacent to Indiana, separated only by the Wabash River, has
suffered agaiu and again through the ravages of the Chinch Bug, crops
on the Indiana side have not often suffered from any extensive or wide-
spread ravages of the pest. Not only this, but at the present time the
worst infested portion of Indiana is composed of those counties whose
western border is the Wabash River, which separates them from Illi-
nois, and from whence the insect occurs in continually diminishing
numbers northward and eastward until we reach the northern coun-
ties of La Porte, St. Joseph, Elkhart, La Grange and Steuben, where its
depredations are almost entirely unknown.* Indeed, during the years
when they are the most numerous elsewhere, I have found them in these
counties only with difficulty, and few of the farmers know what the
insect is like. In almost exactly the same latitude in De Kalb County,
Illinois, within 60 miles of Lake Michigan, they have been a serious
pest since 1855.
* The only exception known to me was in Elkhart County, where they were re-
ported to Mr. J. R. Dodge, Statistician of the Department of Agriculture in 1857,
(See Bull. 17, U. 8S. Dept. Agri., Div. Ent., p 9.) Mr. Dodge has very kindly looked
up this matter, and writes me that these bugs were oaly reported from one locality in
very limited numbers and did no appreciable damage.—F.. M. W.
56
A line drawn from the northwestern corner of Indiana ‘diagonally
across the State to the Ohio line, at the southeast corner of Jay County,
will divide from the remainder of the State nearly all of twenty-four
counties over which the Chinch Bug is either unknown or occurs in too
limited numbers to cause serious damage. These are the counties enu-
merated in Tables A and B. As the numbers of counties from which I
have information of serious and wide-spread damage does not amount
to twenty-four, I have added others, in which we have observed con-
siderable numbers of Chinch Bugs, and filled out the number with coun-
_ ties situated in the infested district. These are enumerated in Tables
Cand D.
TABLE A.—Acreage of various grains produced in 1887 throughout the area over which
Chinch Bugs do not occur in destructive numbers.
i Excess
Total t ll
Counties. W heat. Oats. Rye. Barley. small Corn. pore
grain. grain over
| corn.
|
PANTING ion se Sheewe acces rca =. 26, 986 9, 142 255 | 35 36, 368 30,257 | + 6,111
JAE ty Sees eee 5 55H Soe eee 48, 362 25, 687 2, 065 101 76, 215 42,004 | +34, 211
BiG OLd ke cseaeecesesces ane 12, 543 2, 544 196 41 15, 324 16,000 | — 676
Deval ee se * cece tcc es 30, 097 13, 390 211 157 43, 855 22,1385 | +21, 720
MOUKUANee sence cease ceoensti 44, 896 15, 207 |~ 705 90 60, 898 35,145 | -+25, 753
WOON saecieis ec aice este eetc xe 29, 903 5, 684 390 35 36, 012 29, 827 +10, 185
Mant secce tet cae tccerek cece 42, 077 5, 455 347 147 48, 026 49,225 | — 1,199
Pn tinOTON) 6612.4 accocies 34, 888 10, 693 800 195 46, 576 38,145 | + 8 431
iy) we ecwsec sso aiucec cisecckoe: 29, 588 8, 766 275 145 38, 774 39,656 | — 882
GSCIUSKO) 2 .a5.cice rine since sis 42, 268 13, 274 240 162 55, 944 40,065 | +15, 879
Weal Tan PO ncan ce sc oesic sss c%)= 36, 903 9, 818 873 37 47, 631 28,292 | +19, 339
MDG ere Uwe ee ciejeiaiecte Som icisiais = 2, 808 26, 690 1, 284 275 31, 057 30,637 | 4 420
POPE OTBse cae co tea caae Cece =: 43, 904 15, 054 802 335 60, 095 39,690 | +20, 405
Wiirstialll’ Ss: ose. sone c-cacceee 35, 062 10, 145 1, 244 186 47, 637 33, 238 | +14, 399
IG ian ean Soa ene eae E Eee 44, 212 7, 919 139 168 52, 438 42, 301 +10, 137
INGDlObseSess soe nam Seaceeme hans; 38, 797 12, 345 120 44 51, 306 29,462 | +21, 854
IPOLUCE taste hs accenseretorce 15, 312 16, 365 1, 026 236 32, 939 21,042 | +11, 897
Palaakieceeatc josceneamessees 19, 267 7, 828 1, 570 394 29, 059 23,686 | + 5,373
Plan Keb aciewscs acco sacks sccatic 3, 591 2.916 1, 657 298 8, 462 7,911 | + 551
PON DOWa on: eer eccee wes ccese 27, 414 9, 253 219 310 37, 196 22,200 | +14, 996
SIPROSOD Meuse ance hows onee ce 41, 525 11, 482 440 30 53, 477 30,698 | +22, 779
WWiabaslive joc cheerios oe. s. oe 41, 109 8, 391 115 149 49, 764 45,638 | + 4,126
Wie Sheen, cote tame aeece 32, 301 6, 196 572 54 39, 123 39322) | aoe
VIAN DRE tema eae an Sn mine Sim 25, 633 9, 727 95 45 35, 500 24,753 | +10, 747
TABLE B.—Acreage of various grains produced in 1888 throughout the area over which
Chinch Bugs do not occur in destructive numbers.
ANTE Sit eo SS GES a epee cosas GEee 23, 130 16, 818 | 249 51 40, 248 31,417 +8, 831
Alen: *-- =< stb Sopoosbee cescee 50, 469 27, 228 | 1, 895 172 78, 764 43, 775 +34, 989
IRC KLOVE) coc cleetsicwiccse.-- = 11, 057 3, 280 253 140 14, 730 16, 633 —1, 903
LOG eee Se eee 2 eee 28, 145 14, 249 138 169 42, 701 25,474 | +17, 227
PSD OEG encanto eis sate Sats c's weenie 43, 818 14, 783 1, 0138 78 59, 692 36, 663 +23, 029
UA GONes se ois soe Selene =i 33, 976 6, 306 267 12 40, 561 29,795 | +10, 766
(ACO Se eine eer ec Sa 38, 808 5, 593 316 201 44, 918 48, 581 —3, 663
Bent Oton. >.<. 2S. 5 -.2-- - = 32, 639 10, 990 218 186 44, 033 40, 218 +3, 815
JDM) Sas Ge otede dae Sse SS CaSO 25, 433 9, 666 311 160 35, 570 40, 750 —5, 180
FRORCIUB ROO? ot S06 ia tcee 5.5 39, 878 14, 201 334 135 54, 548 41, 025 +18, 523
WIPO AN On a's Saise seins na se'= 33, 540 10, 285 750 55 44, 630 30, 252 +14, 378
Lop h(t SSeS ae See Sa Sear 3, 874 21, 026 1, 330 221 26, 461 29, 510 —3, 049
AOU UO aise ale oie = estan nae 40, 642 18, 033 772 787 60, 284 41, 345 +18, 889
Maran allceenec scene: cuacse a 33, 187 11, 095 1, 449 ral 46, 012 37, 134 -++8, 878
iE eae OES a ace 44, 250 8, 160 126 188 52, 724 42, 743 +9, 981
ie (a 0) jhe ee ol eee See ee 37, 983 14, 336 217 44 52, 580 29, 915 +22, 665
WOE Gal neg ona miter aenine oe 16, 648 17, 428 1, 593 213 35, 882 27, 863 +8, 019
LEGG a el a ie een era 17, 007 3, 407 1, 638 282 29, 339 26, 232 -++3, 097
SLATKG ee ios Sens ae seas oeee 5, 96E 3, 476 1, 696 237 9, 374 8, 683 +741
DUGUUEN Sccet au vasa beioantescels 25, 944 10, 288 310 317 36, 859 21, 373 -++15, 486
NU OSEDh tasbieca sce ee eee 37, 602 12,170 642 | 714 51, 128 29, 343 -+-21, 785
WADA See e eee. cette beads 40, 202 9, 892 183 | 73 50, 350 44, 080 +6, 270
WEIS Sate oe cocks fen shea 28, 427 8, 352 611 | 147 37, 547 38, 009 —462
Wy bitlesetace: Soho. wee 21, 789 10, 647 65 39 32, 540 23, 503 +9, 037
57
TABLE C.—Acreage of various grains produced in 1887 throughout the area over which
Chinch Bugs occur sometimes in destructive nnmbers.
Oth Excess
: aan f small
Counties. Wheat. Oats. Rye. Barley. small Corn. |° Ba
grain. Sra
5 over corn.
ENTONS sere <5 = sce - oe sence 1, 592 35, 529 390 125 38, 036 71,714 | —33, 678
Glare oo... eR eee A ee 2°, 610 9, 963 160 211 | 32,944 | 26,447] +6,497
RPA eo 2 ainleSgicis-e ences 7, 513 9, 389 Doi] were meee 16, 927 15, 491 +1, 436
WDSINHESS = sacs ss os- se weeses 40, 186 10, 575 340 42 51, 148 39, 472 +11, 671
INOS Sosa 3 cone cisiaticnee 24, 527 10, 950 20 87 35, 584 22, 042 +13, 542
OTS) Te 72, 513 5, 740 386 31 | 78, 670 45, 108 +33, 562
CHASER: So ae Se ere es 24, 943 11, 930 239 178 37, 290 34, 141 +3, 149
MAMBO ec sc eS tecccs sec ek. 27,584 | 14,733 297 45 | 42.659] 42,633 +26.
TESTOR Se Aa eee 48, 483 6, 426 207 68 | 55,184] 47,3381 | +7853
aNyMenGe) -po-----=.25~------= 11, 423 14, 395 136 5L 26, 005 25, 228 +777
PNG HR GM eo esa ie1ela sss - = 15, 740 7, 766 136 191 23, 833 21, 493 +2, 440
ULL: 2 ate eee 9, 505 9, 399 35 40 | 18,979 | 16,462 2, 517
OGTR Beano oepegeaaoroaesoae 12, 322 17, 708 84 96 30, 210 26, 836 +-3, 374
Oven ear coe Sais ninc cons IyaebSaE 14, 343 9, 705 9L 20 24, 159 16, 910 +7, 249
Lin soeoeogs aa0ce= 33, 828 9, 426 297 66 | 43,617 39, 751 +3, 866
TERE Gs ca a a 35, 698 9, 080 83 107 | 44,968 | 30,095 | +414, 873
WIOSOW etn Salctoes/sink.cese oe 60, 902 6, 600 120 47 | 67,669 | 38,979 +28, 690
LET eee SS EEE Cee Cee eens 33, 544 7, 618 117 96 41, 370 37, 006 +4, 364
See SS ee reeset lumens Gir. 10, 059 826 55 44, 564 44,109 |! +455
PIP PECANOE ~~ -<... 18, 465 19, 922 39 | 46 | 38, 472 34, 911 +3, 561
| 1 t
* Counties marked with asterisk (*) are those in which Chinch Bugs have been reported in destruct-
ive numbers.
- i | *
Much has been said of late of the influence which the cultivation of
wheat and other grains has on the numbers and distribution of the
Chinch Bug. Tables A, B, C, and D, here given show the acreage of
‘each of the cereal grains in forty-eight counties for the years 1887 and
1888. It will be observed that among the uninfested counties there are
but four which had a greater area of small grain than of corn in 1887
and in 1888. In 1887, in eleven of these same counties, the area of
wheat exceeded that of corn, in six of which counties the Chinch Bug
58
is unheard of. Practically the same state of affairs existed in 1888,
both as to crop and bugs. In the twelve counties more or less infested
with bugs in 1887, four had a larger area of corn than of small grain,
and all but seven showed a greater area of corn than wheat. In 1888
only three had a greater area devoted to wheat than corn, and six hada
greater area of corn than of small grains. It will be observed that Sul-
livan County, which probably suffers from Chinch Bug injury as bad as
any portion of the State, is one of these. It appears therefore that the
nature of the crop has of itself nothing to do with the distribution of
the Chinch Bug in Indiana.
TABLE E.—Total amount, in inches and tenths, of precipitation and mean temperature, in
degrees and tenths, at Princeton, Gibson County, Ind., latitude 38° 23' N., during the
months of April, May, and June, for the years 1835, 1886, 1887, 1888, and 1889.
April. May. , June.
Year. _ i ie
Precipi- | Tempera- Precipi- Te™pera-| Precipi- | Tempera-
tation. ture. | tation. | ture. | tation. ture.
: Pe a ee ee
Bete ane reine foes eLok Sos Sch seneead 3. 70 | SEO lien 2e80sl-< 26105 5.90 71.9
OG reete ee came see cate sees wecme aoese 3. 50 | 55. 3 | 2.10 66. L 4, 90 71.3
ISBT oe tear sasrae tsa ace ce hiss cone Moa, 2.30 | 53.2 6.10 68. 0 -10 74.3
DBS areas Ree ie ta omen ie Soe sicrasace noah 1. 50 50.3 1. 95 63.5 2.50 76.7
AES oes seme cece tele clsiisteereses cee eee - 80 | 55.2 4. 40 64.4 3. 60 70.7
|
TABLE F.—Total amount, in inches and tenths, of precipitation and mean temperature, in
degrees and tenths, at Angola, Steuben County, Ind., latitude 41° 37' N., during the
months of April, May, and June, for the years 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, and 1889.
LO Reet: eee eer mee hovh. AES bed 4.35 45.6 | 6.95 56. 4,32 66.9
REG: -2S8 Sod see ee eae ea ata 2.77 52.5 | 3.49 63.5 4.16 67.2
(ih Sa Gober ee ae San Ma Aaa he “asap 45.2 | 195| 70.8 5.24 71.2
Thy gee es So Ss 6 ee ee eee 1. 64 46.5 | 37. | 61.9 5. 16 70. 6
elt) SE Se Qoacn sp ecedocm SEES He eee oeednne 1,19 49, 2 | 5. 25 61.4 3. 50 68.5
TABLE G.—Total amount, in inches and tenths, of precipitation and mean temperature, in -
degrees and tenths, at Sandwich, De Kaib County, Ill., latitude 41° 31’ N., during the
months of April, May, and June of the years 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, and 1889.
|
ICI Sets Coe eee See ee ete ree 2. 46 46.71 1.30 58. 65 2.94 | 68. 95
USE Shs 58 ieee ce nt cea ea 1.35 56. 40 3. 06 64.70 | 1. 28 | 68. 82
ORE eee ca eto She tes it eee 57 53.12 1. 87 68. 55 | 17%) 75. 07
THC ee ar ye eo ae he 1.70 49. 84 5. 14 58. 72 | 2.76 | 72.48
TH} 30) 2) Get ee a a ae 3,115 52. 03 3.08 61.71 | 5. 40 | 68. 62
Neither can this unequal distribution be attributed to the interspersion
of timber Jands among the cultivated fields, as the northern and south-
ern portions are about equally wooded, and, besides, the treeless
prairies of the State are not particularly subject to invasions of Chinch-
bugs. Low temperature can hardly be held responsible for the phe-
nomenon, as the ravages in more northern localities like Nebraska,
northern Iowa, and in Minnesota will attest. Coming northward from
the Ohio River, during the season of drought which has occurred each
year since 1886, one can not help but admit that the effects of dry
ee
eT
59
weather are greatest in the southern portion of the State. But the dif-
ference between this weather condition is certainly not so marked be-
tween Tippecanoe and Benton Counties on the one hand, and La Porte
and Lagrange Counties on the other, as to result in a difference in the
number of bugs amounting to that between a great abundance and
almost none at all. In Tables E, F, and G are given the mean tempera-
ture and rain-fall for the months during which these elements most
affect the Chinch Bug, and extending over a period of five years.* Thisis
as far back as the Indiana records extend. The records from Princeton,
Ind., indicate the meterological conditions during this period in the bug
infested area, and those from Angola are a like record of the weather
conditions in the region exempt from Chinch Bug attack, while Table G
gives the meterological conditions in De Kalb County, northern Illinois,
where Chinch Bugs have been abundantsince 1855, formerly doing serious
damage to spring wheat, and have, since about 1862 (wheat of any sort
being no longer grown to any extent), been transferring their attention
to the corn crop, but being at present less abundant than in south-
eastern Indiana or southern Illinois.
From a study of the tables given it will be seen that while the
northern Illinois locality had a less rain-fall during the spring and early
summer than the northern portion of Indiana, it also had a less amount
than had southern Indiana; yet, while Chinch Bugs are more numerous
in the Ulinois section than in northern Indiana, they are not so abund-
ant as in southern Indiana.
Geologically, the northern portion of Indiana differs from the south-
eastern portion, the former being Devonian and the latter carbonifer-
ous or subcarboniferous. This, however, could have little effect on the
Chinch Bug, except, possibly, so far as it influenced the natural flora,
especially the grasses. Prof. James Troop, who has made the grasses
of Indiana a study, informs me that the following are all, or nearly all,
the species found in the southern portion of the State which do not
occur in the northern portion: Uniola latifolia, Arundinaria tecta, Pas-
palum fluitans, P. eve, Panicum prolificum, P. anceps, P. vicidum, Andro-
pogon divisitiflorus.
From the foregoing it will be seen that to no one of these elements
alone, as existing between southwestern Indiana and Illinois on the
one hand, and northeastern Indiana, southern Michigan, and northern
Ohio on the other, can this immunity from Chinch Bugs in these last
localities be traced. Whether the combination of two of these elements,
such as dry weather and wheat-growing, is to be held wholly responsi-
ble, or whether there is still another potent element, as yet unknown
to us, which, either in itself or combined with some other, is the prime
cause of the present state of affairs, only future studies can demonstrate.
* Kindly supplied me by N. E, Ballou, M. D., Ph. D., Sandwich, I1., for thirty years
volunteer signal observer at that place.—I’. M. W.
60
That dry weather during spring and early summer is almost invaria-
bly associated with an increase, and wet weather during the same
period with a decrease of Chinch Bugs is usually true, but why this is
so has never been definitely explained.
The fungoid disease known as Lntomophthora has, since it was studied
by Dr. Shimer, been known to be much more fatal in wet than in dry
weather. How far this would prove true,-and to what extent the
farmer could rely upon this fungus to keep the Chinch Bug in check,
gave the incentive for carrying out the following experiments.
Karly in July, 1888, a large number of Chinch Bugs, principally pupee
nearing the last molt, were placed in a close glass vessel and kept in a
very damp atmosphere and under high temperature. Although kept
for two weeks under these conditions we failed to produce the Entomoph-
thora among them. This was accepted as evidence that the fungus did
not exist in any stage of deveiopment here at La Fayette, Ind., although
it was reported from an adjoining State.
On July 20, of the present year, we received some dead chinch bugs
from Prof. F. H. Snow, of Lawrence, Kans., which were said to be af-
fected by Entomophthora. These diseased bugs were placed under glass
with living ones from the fields, the latter being provided with food and
kept thus confined for fifty-three hours, when the major portion of them
were placed on several hills of corn, seriously infested by bugs, the
remainder with the dried remains received from Professor Snow being
scattered about over a small area of young wheat sown for experiment,
and also swarming with young Chinch Bugs. The hills of corn on which
the bugs had been placed were isolated from others, equally badly in-
fested, by narrow frames of boards placed on the ground, and the upper
edges covered with tar. This last precaution was taken in order to pre-
vent communication with other hills, intended as checks on those used
directly inthe experiment. The area of young wheat over which infested
bugs had been placed was not inelosed, but its limits carefully marked.
Vive days after, July 27, a single bug was found on one of the isolated
hills of corn which had very evidently died from the effects of Entomoph-
thora, and by the 30th enough others were found to show that the fungus
had fully established itself, and the barriers about the isolated hills were
removed. On August 2, dead bugs covered with Hntomophthora were
found in considerable numbers about hills of corn, 25 feet from where the
original colonies had been placed, and also throughout and even 55 feet
beyond the area of young wheat over which dead and affected bugs
had been distributed. Daily observations were now made, but the pro-
gress of the disease seemed to come to a stand-still. From the 5th of
August up to the 9th it was almost impossible to get sufficient material,
outside, to enable me to carry on laboratory experiments. August 13,
the spread of Hntomophthora appeared to have taken on new life, and dis-
eased bugs were becoming much more numerous. August 15, found
diseased bugs 172 feet from any place where they had been previously
observed. August 20, diseased bugs were very abundant over all of.
61
the area where disease had been distributed, and two days later exam-
ples were found a quarter of a mile from the starting point of the dis-
ease. Immediately after this, however, another halt, both in the in-
tensity of attack and rapidity with which it spread, due either to the dry
weather, or to the fact that the bugs had now all reached the adult
stage, and had become diffused over the country, no longer congregat-
ing together. From either one or the other, or both of these causes, I
lost track of the Entomophthora and was not able to again find it in the
fields. It seems proper to state here that Chinch Bugs were not at any
time excessively abundant. The greatest numbers were in the exact
localities where the disease was first distributed, the congregating at
these places being brought about by the close proximity toa large num-
ber of small experimental plats of wheat, and when this was harvested
the*bugs. collected en masse on the corn and young wheat. In connec-
tion with these facts, it is also interesting to note that from July 15 to
August 51 there were ten days on which rain fell. The dates of these
rains and the amount of pees is oven below:
| Precipi- | ‘ | Precipi-
Date. Teoria Date. tation.
Inches. | Inches.
Jie Uf steecboespeededcccanecenusbqapeac ol) | OIIN) BY) ere coroncsapnatnacednnoneosocebe .78
= chose SS ooes BEaas Sone cossesoe0> 1, 25 sQbeciSsa St 6onessaosaqreccssoescs 50
UN SoSS oe OAS REE CSCO DSO bSEOoeacSooS BA eel Oe Ol versie wie tec epeteerersiat eee reece 3.36
DORE ae pr eteem asics Selanne ers - 04 | 1B Back Sabopaadone erate opopnesneser 15
7D. ooosocnocisuobeose) sasegsensceses 12 IEWISEE cdiGoobaccosscadacr Baokeoade 02
With a view of learning whether o or ‘not there v was any difference as
regards susceptibility to the attack of Hntomophthora, between bugs in
different stages of development, a series of experiments was begun, as
follows:
Young plants of Setaria glauca were transplanted to a box, and upon
each plant was placed a dead bug covered with the fungus, and also
healthy larve ; larvee just on the point of pupation; pup just prior to
reaching the adult stage; and fully developed adults, each stage being
placed on separate plants and each covered with a small inverted glass
vial numbered by lettering. As checks, another series was prepared
like the first in every particular. The soil in the box was kept weli
moistened, and the plants remained fresh. This experiment was made
on August 2, about the time when the attack outside began to diminish
in intensity. The following are the results of examinations on the
dates indicated, the original experiments being numbered by capitals,
and the checks by small letters, thus—A-—a, adult; B—b, young larvee ;
C-c, older larvee; D-d, pupe.
Date. | A. | a. | Bo] ob Co alleexe Dn Weng ad
— i | aes eee
|
Aug. 5 | ealthy | : Hewlthy | Healthy .- re Healthy -| 1 dead ...| Healthy -| 1 dead ...| 1 dead.
Aug. 6 | 1 dead . 1 dead . --| Healthy | Healthy -| 1 dead ...| Healthy .| 3 dead ...| 1 dead.
Aug. 7 | Alldead ..| 3dead .. | 3dead-..| 1 dead ...| 3 dead . Wdeatees|- soo a----|)| odeade
Aug. 16 | All dead ..| All dead - | All dead. | Alldead | Alldead | Alldead | All dead | All dead.
— uF a ee —— —
62
On the same day this experiment was begun, a second was also com-
menced, like the first in every particular except that the healthy bugs
used, in experimentation, were exposed to fungus infested individuals
for only five hours, and then placed under their respective glasses. As
a result on ‘August 15, thirteen days after, none had died, thus strongly
indicating that the Hntomophthora did not exist generally in the fields,
and that it could not be communicated during a period of five hours,
exposure.
On August 7 a large number of healthy bugs were placed under
glass, with a number which had recently died from Hntomophthora, the
moisture in the vessel being absorbed by calcium chloride. A check
experiment was also commenced, where the material and the condi-
tions were the same, except the humidity of the atmosphere, care being
taken to have the latter as nearly saturated with moisture as possible.
August 10, the original experiment was divided and a portion of the
healthy bugs removed and placed in a damp environment, the remain-
der being kept under the original dry conditions. The results on
August 22 were as follows. In the original experiment, where the
healthy bugs had been continually in dry quarters, not a single bug
had died from Entomophthora. Not only this, but none of those which
had been removed after three days and placed in dry quarters had died,
showing that the disease was not contracted and did not develop in
healthy bugs, though kept exposed in a dry atmosphere for fifteen
days, nor could it be originated by placing, in a damp atmosphere, for
twelve days, bugs which had been exposed to contagion for three days
in dry quarters. The results withthe check experiment were quite dif-
ferent. Within five days after being confined with the Yntomophthora,
the healthy bugs began to die from effects of the disease, and in three
days more every one had died from the same cause, their bodies being
covered with spores.
Still another experiment was tried which consisted in confining a
large number of healthy bugs with others diseased in a damp environ-
ment, and when the fungus had destroyed a portion the remainder were
divided and a part removed to dry quarters. Theresult was that while
those left in damp confinement continued to die, none of those inclosed
in dry environment were destroyed. As the fungus had by this time be-
come distributed over the experiment farm so that I could not tell with
certainty whether material from the fields was in a perfectly healthy
condition or not, no farther experiments were made in this direction.
From the foregoing it will be observed that the essential element in
all of these experiments was an abundance of moisture, without which
the Hntomophthora could neither become established nor flourish after
it had gained a footing. Again the extent to which the disease will
prove contagious will depend upon the number of bugs. Without
great numbers massed together comparatively few would contract the
disease. To sum up the matter there is little hope for relief to the
farmer from the influence of Hntomophthora, except when Chinch Bugs
stn ticki:
63
are abundant and massed together in great numbers, and during a
period of wet weather. I have succeeded in getting the fungus estab-
lished at two widely located points in Indiana, and do not consider it
at all difficult to introduce in localities where Chinch Bugs are abun-
dant, provided the weather is favorable. But if it is ever utilized by
the farmer, which seems to me to be at present a matter of considerable
doubt, it will only be after the pest has become very abundant, during the
time between the first larvaland adult stages and in a wet time. After
the Hntomophthora has been introduced into a certain field it will be-
come diffused only in proportion as the bugs travel about and healthy
bugs come in contact with spores from those which have died from the
disease. This will not be very great until the pupal stage is reached.
The larve of Chinch Bugs seem to in some way understand that while
moulting they will be well nigh helpless, and hence hide themselves away
in vast numbers in secluded places. Under such conditions the spores
thrown from diseased bugs would reach a larger number of their fellows,
I havefound adults but recently moulted affected by the Entomophthora.
After the bugs acquire wings and scatter themselves over the country,
the liability to contagion will be again reduced, unless in case of very
severe invasions, where from force of numbers congregating on or about
food plants becomes a necessity. Hence, the introduction of the fungus
among larvee will at first proceed but slowly, and only in extreme cases
and under favorable conditions can it be expected to proceed much more
rapidly among adult bugs. In short, the only way that this fungoid
disease seems capable of being employed in agriculture is by the estab-
lishment of some central propagating station to which farmers can apply
and receive an abundant supply of infested bugs on short notice. By
this means they could take advantage of a rainy period of a week or
ten days, and, if they can contrive by sowing plats of millet and Hun-
garian to mass the bugs in certain localities about their fields, they
might accomplish something towards warding off an invasion. But
the possibility of overcoming an invasion after it is fully under way,
as is almost sure to be the case during a dry season, it must be con-
fessed is not very encouraging. My failure afterrepeated experiments
to produce this Hntomophthora in the vicinity of Lafayette without the
importation of germs is decidedly against the theory that might be ad-
vanced that the northeastern portion of the State was kept free of
destructive invasions by reason of this disease brought about by wet
weather. There is as yet no reason to believe that the disease has
ever existed in that section of the State.
Before leaving the subject it will be proper to state that in my exper-
iments a larva of Chrysopa was introduced by accident and passed
through the larval stage, feeding continually on bugs dying from the
effects of the fungus.
After harvest the Chinch Bugs, as usual, transferred their attention
to various grasses which were growing up among the stubble, more
especially Setaria and Panicum, but as these succumbed to their contin-
64
ued attacks they transferred their attention to Timothy, and appeared
to subsist equally well upon it.
At the date of wheat-harvesting, fields were swarming with a species
of lady beetle, Coccinella 9-notata, they having become excessively
abundant by reason of the great numbers of the Grain Aphis, and
as these disappeared the Coccinella was obliged to scatter themselves
about and seek other food. As large numbers were found on stalks of
growing corn infested by chinch-bugs, it seemed proper to determine
the object of attraction to such places. The problem was in part solved
by the fact that wherever great numbers of Chinch Bugs had punctured
the corn plants the sap would exude from these punctured spots, and
there the beetles would be found, singly or in groups of two or three,
engaged in feeding upon the sap. Beetles placed under glass with a
great number of Chinch Bugs refused to prey upon the latter, even when
brought nearly to the point of starvation.
While searching under the sheaths of corn on several occasions larvie
and pupie of a Syrphus fly were found, ii many cases, right among the
masses of young bugs. From some of these pup thus obtained we
reared adults of Pipiza pulchella. Whether this species will ultimately
prove to be an enemy of the Chinch Bug, it is too much to say, but the
larvie found by me could only have fed upon bugs or exuding sap, as
they were near the roots of the corn where no pollen iad collected.
THE GRAIN APHIS.
(Siphonophora avene Fab.)
Probably no insect has appeared in the State of Indiana for many
years which caused such a general commotion among wheat-growers,
and which worked so little damage, considering, its numbers, as this.
Occurring every year in greater or less numbers, and having been
frequently sent us by farmers, we were not at all surprised to receive
specimens from Gallatin County, Hl., on May 27, and also a few days
later from our aged friend Dr. Richard Owen, of New Harmony, Posey
County, Ind. Probably about May 20 can be set down as the date of
appearance, in numbers to attract attention in the extreme southern
part of the State, the invasion terminating in the extreme northern por-
tion about the Ist of July.
That the outbreak, which was probably the most severe since 1861
and 1862, should reach the magnitude that it did, both in point of
numbers and area infested, was a surprise to me, as the preceding
November had been spent by myself in traveling about, visiting the
wheat fields of various portions of the State, these insects then being
observed in no greater numbers than was usual at that season of the
year. The winter following was an extremely mild one, which, taken
with the statement of Dr. Cyrus Thomas,* that the insect passes the
winter on grain plants in the fields, might lead to a misunderstanding
as to the actual effect of mild winters.
* Eighth Rep. St. Ent. Il1., 1879, p. 53.
65
The winters of 1861 and 1862, the years of the serious outbreaks
in New York and New England, though not particularly severe in the
sections above mentioned, were by no means noted for mildness. It
seems doubtful, therefore, if the causes leading to the invasion of the
present year would carry us farther back than the spring months, a
statement strongly substantiated by our own observation.
Starting, then, with the month of March we search for some meteoro-
logical element which might affect the increase of the Grain Aphis, and
which appears both in the present season and also in 1861 and 1862.
TABLE H.—General weather conditions in various localities during years of great abun-
dance of Grain Aphis.
Locality. Year. | March. April. May. June.
(1861... § Cool... Cool .---.. Cook Fone Goal.
eg ee Ny Marland oe Peen eos 1969, .|$ Coots -.! Cool 222222) Cook 222222] Goal
| Wiet 242% 1 Wietsoses. Dryeeeeene dry
Tnddiana 2-22. 2 see ees ce eeeseeeseeeeee eens PSU one oe ey tbey ee
DYPSTELTe NCW.) VOLK Seems ae eles sane eal» IEE) 2 c|ladcnetacsbaclloanncecasaoa|laocessans = Wet
L
The weather conditions as s relating to New York and New England
for 1861 and 1862, as given in Table H are based upon reports contained
in the Country Gentleman for these years. Those for Indiana are based
on the reports of the State Weather Service, and the data for western
New York, for 1889, was given me by Prof. James Troop, Horticultural-
ist of the Indiana Experiment Station, who visited Livingston County
in July. |
From Table I, taken from Indiana Weather Service reports, it will be
observed that during March and April the temperature was considera-
bly above the normal, with the precipitation during this time below the
average. On the other hand, the temperature of the months of May
and June was much below the normal, with, as indicated by Table I, pre-
cipitation above the average. By referring to Table K, however, it will
be observed that about half of the precipitation of May fell on the 29th
and 30th of the month, thereby changing the apparent state of affairs,
and practically become May into the an period.
We have stated that the outbreak of the grain Aphis became con-
spicuous in southern Indiana and Illinois in May. It is also true that
they reached their maximum numbers during the very last of this month
and early June. In other words, they appeared during cool, dry weather,
and disappeared in cool, wet weather. Thus far the old theory of ento-
mologists, that wet weather is detrimental to their increase appeared
true.
But it is also true, that while in southern localities they were disap-
pearing during a wet period, in central and northern Indiana and
western New York they were rapidly gaining in numbers, under pre-
cisely similar conditions.
23479—No. 22 5
66
Turning now to Table H, we search for an element common to the in-
vasions of 1861 and 1862 and 1889, bearing in mind that in southern
Indiana the pest arose to the maximum during May and early June,
and in New York during June and early July.
TABLE I.—Comparative temperature and precipitation throughout the Slate of Indiana
Sor March, April, May, and June, 1889.
TEMPERATURE (DEGREES—FAHRENHEIT).
|
;
|
{
|
|
|
March. April. May. June.
f | g g a lg
a om om om one
mS HS HS HS
Counties. Stations. is a Es a 3 arr al A |
5 25 25 ae eo: a
5 = ela a ae ra e| tS | renal
S |-8 | sa 8) ee) epee aes
~ Qe 3) a7 a aE =) | Qe
= ° o =) (5) ° o o |} @o
A A Q | A A A A A A
SOTHGIIT pa Ae eae omepe eee ane 5 | 41.1 2.8) 54589) 0509 | 6474 1 eae
Dnabars; e026 =" Huntingburgh ~~. 6 | 41.4 +4.6 | 54.6 21 | 64.0 | --1.4 | 72.8 | —1.0
Gibson... =...) erinceton <----_ =. 5 | 41.8] +4.7 | 54.1] 41.1 | 64.7 | —0.3 | 74.0 | —3.8
Crawford .....- Marenvoi--s-_---- 6 | 42.3 oe Meee d aecta lene: 65.3 | —0:9") 72.2) —093
Washington ...| Salem -.-......... Grae 42959) 158529) —0.70 6452) "051" | eee eee eae
Switzerland! -.4) Wevaly.---.5.-s50-- 21 | 42.8; +3.9 | 54.8! 41.3 | 65.4 | —0.8 | 74.4 | —3.5
Jennings ....-. Butlerville ...-.-- 4 | 42.4} 42.9 | 55.5 | —2.0 | 65.7 | —4.0 | 73.7 | —3.2
Greene .... -... Worthington ..... 6 | 39.6 +1.5 | 538.9 | +0.9 63.9 | —3.2 | 70. 2))- —2. 4
Bartholomew ..| Columbus ..-..--. 6 | 38.4 2h | Oe.2 [4-052 || GdoA4e |) oe An eee
Riplovies sos Sunman ...... sues 6 | 39.4 | +3.0] 53.4 | +0.4 | 65.3 | —3.0| 72.5 | —4.3
Warrick 2... DagoniaSprings. - 6 | 43.4 |. +2.1 | 55.8 | —0O.7 | 64.6 | —2.5 | 72.0 | —2.3
Clik sae cee 3: IMC CMICK Saat oe tz | 42.9 +3.1 | 55.3 | +1.14 | 64.5 | —1.4 | 74.3 | —2.3
RORY el esate ree corel ae nale nea aire ne ce 5 | 36.7 +4,.9 | 51.0 | +0.3 61.9 | —1.0 | 70.4 | —2.6
Johnson .....-- PATI) waeeeeee 6} 37.9} +5.1 |] 52.0 | +1.4 | 63.0 | —1.2 | 70.8 | —2.5
Havetto:. .- 1.5. Connersville...... T loess +-5,'5.| 49.8 | +3.0) || 62:6) ),—121. | Tide Sae6
Marion :....... Indianapolis ..... 18 | 39.8 2.8 | 52.5 | +0.1 | 64.1 | —3.9 | 72.5 | —5.3
BNNs saeocwon: IU VE hie Sees eee 8 | 35.0 =6- 1, |, 495.2") 0.49" (G02 1 GS a7 alee :
entry - 22.5.2 Spiceland ......-- 35 | 37.0 +6.0 | 50.0] +2.6 | 61.6) +0.7 | 70.5 | —2.5
IWiayne o. s.<55 Richmond ........ 6 | 35.9 +2.0 | 50.5 | —3.1 62.0 | —4. 2) 69249) ==255) 2
Randolph ...... Farmland .......- 6 | 36.4 +6.0 | 48.7 | +2.8 | 61.3 | —0.3 | 69.7 | —2.3 :
Delawzure ...-... Muncietcsoeace nes 4 | 38.1 +5.2 | 52.3 | —1.8 | 62.2 | —1.1 ) 70.0 1] —1.5 3
Grier Ce este 8 tek eee one ra Fd 5° 34.5) +3.8 | 49.9 | —0.1 | 61.0 | 2.4] 70.0) 38 |
Tippecanoe ....| Latayette.......-.. 10 | 36.1 | +1.7 | 54.7] —3.9 | 61.4 | —2.1 | 70.0 | —3.8
Carroll... cs Delphi) 2s -se-<06 4.) 36,0) =--107 | 5i06 | —1.4 | 6203) || 397. | Sesees eee
Whitley ....... Columbia City. --. 4 | 34.7 +1.9 | 48.9 | —0.9 60.0 | —2.7 | 69.5 | —5.6 ;
Steuben ....... AMO Ol Feces coe 5 | 31.7] +6.3 | 47.8 | +1.4 | 63.1 | —1.7 | 68.9 | —0.4
BSERGG coe) coe pee +3.9|519|/ 0.00 | 621] —1.4| 70.9 | —3.0
:
PRECIPITATION (INCHES). {
MOUBNCIM cafe cactian| sscmeer ne cmatermewicas 5 | 2.67 | —1.49 | 3.26 | —2.45 | 3.94 |+1.56 | 4.07 |+0, 65
Mubpis)+..-s =. Huntingburgh..-. 6 | 3.28 | —2. 48 | 2.98 | —3.30 | 3.92 |+-2.63 | 3.86 |—0. 24
GrpSsON ene sais Princeronasseeeee | 5 | 2.45 | —0.45 | 2..43'| —1.63 | 3.09 |4+12.31 | 3.55 |--0.05
Crawford ..<... Marengo .--..--.: 6 | 3.25 | —2.15 | 5.28 | —4.68 | 6.00 |+3.85 | 5.27 |+1.25
Wiashington: .-] Salem ........-... 6 | 2.62 | —1.56 | 3.68 | —2.58 | 3.24 |+2.05 os te |e
Switzerland ...| Vevay.-....-..... 91 | 4.03 |'—3, 20 | 3.40 | —2.48 | 3.53 |+2.64 | 5.07 |—0. 61
Jennings ......| Butlerville ....... 4 | 3.35 | —2.21 | 2.93 | —1.72 | 5.56 |+0. 87 | 5.56 |—1. 85
Greene:.- .2::..- Worthington ...-. 7 | 2.59 | —0.58 | 3.04 | —1.50 | 4.19 |—1.29 | 4.51 |+-2. 8L 2
3artholomew -..| Columbus .....--. 6 | 2.52 | —1.65 | 2.60 | —1.96 | 3.45 |+1.35 | 3.50 }+0. 88
Ip leyess cscs NUMAN +2. scate es 6 | 2.45 | —1.22 | 3.41 | —1.77 | 4.38 |4+1.48 | 4.35 |+-1.61 ‘
Wrarticlks.<. 25. Dagonia Springs. . 6 | 2.92 | —1.11 | 2.88 | —1.90 | 3.06 !41.02 | 5.10 |—0. 61
Olarkh 2. 4.-.20 Bitte racks sae 12 | 2.73 | —1.86 | 3.65 | —2.70 | 4.09 |+1.46 | 4.04 |-+-0.18
Conbralise. tic see-3| Seder 5k ce eee 5 | 2.33 | —0.98 | 2.82 | —1.46 | 4.19 /4+1. 43 | 3.80 |+1.08
Jolinson ....--. iP rankline-= : eos.< | G | 2.45 | —1.10 | 2.68 | —1. 47 | 4.04 |4+-0.33 | 3.80 |+-2. 20
Fayette........ Connersville..-.... 7 | 2.55 | —1.70 | 2.82 | —1.43 | 4.47 |4-2.12 | 4.37 |—0.61
Marion:-2-2.:2- Indianapolis ..---. 18 | 3.85 | —L.70 | 3.59 | —1.47 | 4.15 |+1.61 | 5.44 |“. 76
PRS Wks emiect ee 2 IMRAN ia cero teat 9 | 3.50 | —1.80 | 4.52 | —2. 44 | 4.89 |4-1.:20 | 5.45 |—0.75
EET TY ae eaeintee Spiceland......... 35 | 3.90 | —1. 82 | 3.20 | —1.52 | 3.35 |+3.08 | 4.20 | +0. 40
WiRNNO: 2: ss 2=m:0 Richmond ........ Gije2038. | — 1.58) 207s) =i Ob Ano 2.5% | 4.07 |—0. 33
Randolph ...... Rarmiand?.-2 5252 6 | 2.18 | —0.46 | 2.52 | —1.45 | 4.42 |—0.27 | 3.68 |+-1.91 3
Delaware ...... Mancie. ss eo Ail Ri darte |) ok3 bn ae) eeetere She teed ael eee eee Se eee ee son 7
INGOT AMOM Us emee ee ecm ae tee se ee oneee 5 | 2.02 | —0.14 |2.03 | —1.15 | 4.46 |4-1. 24 | 4712 |-F056r :
Tippecanoe ....| Lafayette .....-..| 10 | 2.39 | —0.70 | 2.78 | —1. 9% | 4.86 |4+1.55 | 4.91 |—0. 77 i
MOMITOLEE oe sac are.c Delph ssscer ce se 4") 1,92 <7 | 2.16 | —2. 35) (ho 82 |e aa lee ered linemen ,
Whitley ....... Columbia City... 4] 2.0L | +0.45 | 2.50 | —1.45 | 5.17 |+-0.78 | 4.46 |—0. 67
Steuben ....... ANOS o-cesec sss 5 | 2.18 | —0.18 | 2.21 | —1.02 | 4.28 |+0.97 | 4,48 |—0. 98
DLAUOSS sc Pees week ware donee Oreo eae 7 | 2 37 | —0.86 | 2.70 | —1.89 | 4.22 |+1.28 | 4.16 |+0.(4
— 667
TABLE K.—2ecords of rain-fall throughout Indiana during May, 1889.
Place of observation. Precipitation. | Noes of
ays.
= igs a8 test in | || |s
Y : = ireatest in |
2 a z 3 E 24 vonsecu- eal al iisioe
ima > s = q Lat lol
; ss 5 F ee tive hours. fg EB
Stations. Covuties. aaa ae res see Slee | esl ee
=aA| 3 iS 3] 9 S&S 12/7) s/o
= 3 pe | ane : 7 sl-/2/4a
re s= o& /aO_!| 6 3 E |siSlS/F%
aloe Se pee = a S (Slsl9|q
4 4 Hy |x bt a MD |OMIO1O
Southern : eae ty In. |
Mount Vernon...| Posey...........-- ab 410, 37 58] 87 54] 4.53 | 3.35 | 29, 3n Te. 8 F116 8
Huntingburgh...| Dubois ...........| a |.-- | 38 21] 86 59] 6.55 | 3.55 | 29,30) 0 7| 0l24) 10
Princeton........ Gabsontesses: ss a=- a | 481) 38 23] 87 35) 4.40 | 1.40 | 29 30 0 1413) 4 ef
Marengo.......-.. Unawior lus semeccs a |.-..| 38 24) 86 24, 9.85 | 5.70 | 29, 30 0 {10 9/12) 11
SHI oH. ses |W aAShIN@tOM ses es c 38 38) 86 7| 5.29 | 2.76 | 29,30 0 j14) 8} 9} 10
WOVEY -222n53 <- Switzerland .....- ab} 525) 38 47) 84 59) 6.17 | 2.60 | 29,30 0 |11) 713 16
Butlerville. ....-- A Rerey ch Kes See aese a | .- | 39 3] 85 33] 6.43 | 4.02 | 29,30 0 |16, 8) 7 13
Worthington .-..; Greene ....-...... c | 540) 39 9} 87 0) 2.90 | 1.86 | 29, 30 Oneal 1l
Seymour. -.-.-.--. ice) NET ete enenec © | 648) 88 45) 86 31| 6.14 | 3.00 29) Sls Or 15
Columbus....---- Bartholomew .....| ¢ |.--.| 39 13] 85 56) 4.80 | 2.27 | 29,30 0 | 910)12 1?
STANT eee Ripley .--s-< paaeee © |1018) 39 14) 85 6) 5.72 | 2.60 | 29, 30 0 |14) 8} 9} 11
Degonia Springs.| Warrick .-.-- -----| @ |.--.| 38 G6) 87 12) 4.04 | 1.45 | 29, 30 0 |15) 511} 10
Cannelton ...--.- OER cele canwesee ce |....| 37 57] 86 42) 4.53 | 1.96 | 29, 30 0 |12 712 10
iene e.s. a k@Olarks. poo bs @ |1000) 38 32) 85 50) 5.55 | 1.78 30 © 110.10}11 10
Menersomville: — lle eCOR-..~ ssc caane EH | pe |-=--=- 5. 78 | 3.43 | 29, 30 0 | 321) 7 12
Nortl Providence): --.d0 ..-2.--.-...- be) 575] 38 25) 85 54] 4.78 | 3.27 | 29, 30 0 {10,4 7) 11
[eee : | ee ee eee
Mmearraeserincy, beet Acute ats, f, += |---| 39 30}, 86 13) 5.17,| 2.62 |... 0ji)91} 1
Central: 5} ry
Mrenkline.sss.-08| JODNSON 2ac56% ac a |.--.| 39 40) 85 3) 4.37 | 1.88 | 29,30 0] 8) 023) 15
Connersville. .-.. Fayette... 20.0... BN Secblleaa55o||suooce 6.59 | 2.14 | 29, 30 0 /12) 4.15) 12
Shelbyville ..-..- Si iasse5 sess Be Ai sranieaiscieei[ess ne 4.65 | 2.15 | 29,30 HIBS ESE |e see
Indianapolis -..-.. Marion.2osd2 05 - ab} 766) 39 47) 86 11, 5.76 | 2.13 | 29, 30 0} 6) 916). 15
MAWZy <25 5. Soe lip ie) Nese ses ieee (63 Ie aeace, aera 6.09 | 2.79 | 29, 30 OV Ss See 14
Spiceland ...-..-.. HONE Vas seis seteoatel. ab|.---| 32 50] 85 25) 6.43 | 3.18 | 29,30 0 | 6/20 5 3
RICHMONd: 4. .2- << AWG yao seats eee c 969) 89 51) 84 53) 6.75 | 2.68 | 29, 30 0 {11} 812) 14
-Rockville..-.---.. Parke) ys2--- Boodos ¢e | 722) 39 46) 87 10) 5.75 | 2 61 | 29, 3 0 18} 013) 12
Ranmilaud:: -2-5-=. Randolph -<2-.,.... a |.--.| 40 11} 85 10) 4.15 | 2.44 | 29,30 0} 8 914 7
MUNGO Ss. 5-2-5 Delaware .......-. @ |-=-.| 40) 11) 85 25) ---- Ps 0 |20) 0.11 8
VG elt eyes feces all ses Sa'ars cise cic acts Stak ee Be el reser eras |e te D2O2 2s oe 0 j11 614 12
Northern: : tay , ¥e a iu ae
Lafayette....--.% Tippecanoe -...... ce b| 661) 40 27) 86 55) 6.41 | 1.92 29 0/11) 614) 12
DAD ne aera eee @arrollie-ssascescee c | 580) 46 36) 86 41) 7.25 | 3.87 | 29,3" 0} 5/1115} 12
Marion . =i: c=! (rants). ssasen58 e |.--.| 40 34] 85 21] 3.20 | 1.60 | 29,30 0 --|- 7
Columbia City...; Whitley ...-.. -- c |.---| 41 9] 85 30) 5.95 | 4.25 | 29. 30 0 wal eh
AN Ola) sce aigt2 <2 Steuben .......---| a | 683} 41 37) 85 1) 5.25 | 3.85 | 29,20 0 |10) 516 7
Lagrange -...---. Lagrange ......--. @ | 980} 41 37] 85 26)..---- ga: eSeot |) Seer |e | ee
Mean ...... sf eae aaa ray Poa Sale a Be 12-2, Oly |oabees 0] 8815} 9
SUMMARY. ~
Sige Number of
~ Precipitation. days.
a3 | Greatest in S
3a | 24 consecu- -| | a
Z tive hours. Bl lis
leg A = | A.
5. | — 4 jsls| jas
Oso! =a no! .| OF
See A lee baal col B
aes|/ &§ | S$ | & lBSlel eS
pehiees q os q Si 23|q2
a q|/A}] nm SAd\S
, e ee
k In. Te
Northern counties........... SC OSES COC OSC Soe oa ann SoC ECUROntE See UN eR Ss See 0| 8 815 9
‘CATT NOOWINIC Se EG RAE Se DB ECIGRICE Ce SEE COCR Gee EEE ne Ser mee BE Gah hae |e ter 0 LL 614 12
NoMinern COUNTCS =. -5.cc0-so-cc ues Roe eee en com aoas eee cee: Dual TpecGAu|Seeres 011 911 11
| — | -—_
RHO een ates Aske Ree sodle Seek oe LL SIS sce cak cleor DaD0 eV onGGnlsecent | 0/10 813) “11
68
The wet weather theory here appears broken, and a low temperature
is the only element which appears uniforinly through the morths dur-
ing which the Grain Aphis was, in all probability, increasing with the
greatest rapidity. That cool weather should favor the development of
these insects would, if true, bea new factor in the problem, not only
of this, but other species also; and before leaning too heavily upon
this evidence we should cast about for good reasons for this apparent
ambiguity.
There is one very important element in this whole problem which we
have so far left out of consideration, viz, natural enemies. While low
temperature might not favor the development of the grain Aphis, or in
fact, if the effect was slightly adverse, if the outcome was to destroy or
retard the development of parasites, the ultimate result would be to
favor the Aphis.
For myself, I can not get rid of the feeling that the indirect action of
the weather of May and June—the action upon the parasites—was
much greater than the direct effect upon the Aphis itself.
According to my field-notes, my earliest observation of the grain
Aphis about La Fayette, lat. 40° 27’ N., during any year, was on April
27, and we have observed them during other years on grain early in
May, in greater abundance than they were the present year on the Ist
of June; yet in the former case no outbreak occurred. Up to the Ist
of June, the Aphis was not exceedingly abundant on grain about La
Fayette. ;
ven as late as the 7th their numbers on the heads of wheat were
not so much greater than they had occasionally been in former years
as to cause alarm; yet within ten days they were swarming in these
same fields in myriads. This certainly bespeaks more of the effects of
relief from the pressure of parasitism than from the effect of meterolog-
ical conditions, especially a change from dry to wet weather.
The question may be asked, why, if this be true, were not the para-
sites destroyed in the southern portion of the State, late in May, thereby
relieving the Grain Aphis from this check on their increase, and why
the latter by reason of this relief did not, as the wheat became too ad-
vanced, overrun the oat-fields, as would have at that date naturally
followed. The reply is that such results did follow toa limited extent,
the oats being rather more seriously infested by the Aphis than farther
northward, and the reason why this feature was not more marked was
doubtless owing to the fact that the cold waves of the first and last of
May, especially the latter, were less severe than farther north, and the
effect on the parasites correspondingly less fatal.
The records of the State weather service show that the minimum
temperature of the first four days of May at La Fayette was below the
freezing point; and on the 22d, 23d, 30th, 31st, from 34° to 39° Fahr.
The mean minimum for the entire State for the same month, according
to the same authority, was, for the southern portion, 36° Fahr., for the
central 329 Fahr., and for the northern 30° Fahr,
69
Buekton (British Aphides, vol. 1, p. 70) has the following to say with
regard to the effect of weather on this and other species of Aphides :
Violent changes of*temperature seem much to check the multiplication of the
Aphides. 58)
o
found without any eggs or traces of young larve of Carpocapsa, the
second brood having already begun its destructive work. From these
few notes it is evident that with a little care early fruit can be kept
almost free from the attacks of the worms, while with later sorts this
becomes more difficult, and such fruit generally is rendered useless by
the attacks of the second brood, and is fed to pigs.
Enemies.—Enemies of the Codling Moth appear to be quite abundant
in California already. I have indeed been surprised in finding minute
Chalcids infesting the eggs.* These are not numerous, and had not |
been observed on eggs of the first brood, yet they may have been pres-
ent. In fourteen boxes of Bartlett pears examined on August 20 and
21, about seventy parasitized eggs were found, and about an equal
number from which the parasites had issued; no doubt some were over-
looked. But few of the pears showed traces of worms of the first brood,
yet nearly all contained eggs of the second brood and very often more
than one. As many as eleven eggs were found upon a single pear.
One was found on the stem, six on the pear surrounding the stem, two
on the upper half and the other two near the calyx. Of these, two con-
tained parasites, one of which had issued, two were still fresh, and the
rest had hatched. Ishould note here that the pears had been taken off
three days previously. In other pears with less eggs, as many as three
and even four young larve were found. The eggs found upon pears
were most numerous near the stem, the others almost invariably on the
upper surface of fruit, and but very few on the lower part or calyx. It
was also observed that the young larve very rarely enter the fruit
where an egg is deposited, but generally somewhat lower down, and in
. many instances instead of going to the center they leave their first mine
after a few days and enter at the open calyx. On apples it appears
they will oftener enter the fruit from the sides.
Many of the eggs of the first brood were destroyed by some enemy,
what I could not learn. They had a brownish and shrunken appearance,
and it is probable that they were destroyed by the Chrysopa larve,
which were present in numbers upon the trees at the time. With the
exception of these and the Coccinellid larvz no other insects were ob-
served in numbers likely to destroy the eggs. This*was not observed
to be the case with eggs of the second brood, at which time the pre-
daceous larvee mentioned had disappeared. The other three parasites
bred during the summer are all from the chrysalids. The most efficient
destroyer of Carpocapsa, however, is a small bat which is always in
search of the moths, appearing somewhat later than the latter, but
keeping up its chase until dark, when apparently the moths cease their
flight and the bats go off in search of other food. Every night during
June as many as six of these bats were to be seen flying around an
isolated apple tree upon which there were a large number of the moths,
not only taking the Carpocapsa on the wing, but very often darting at a
*This parasite is a species of the genus Trichogramma.—C. V. Rh.
92
leaf to get the resting moth. Of not less value is the larva of a Neu-
ropterous insect, a Raphidia, which is present in numbers. Its long
and flat structure together with its activeness enables it to hunt up any
larva that may be present under bark or in crevices of the tree.
Not only is the larva devoured but the chrysalis likewise, and with-
out doubt often the mature moth. It was indeed very hard work to
find any larve or pups of Carpocapsa upon trees where the larvee of
Raphidia were present, and the latter occurred upon nearly every tree.
As arule, not more two or three could be found upon one tree by break-
ing off all the loose bark and examining the crevices, and often none at
all. These larvee are always on the lookout for food, crawling up aud
down the trees, but being chiefly concealed by the bark. Away from
the trunk of the tree, however, more larve are found. An old and partly
decayed stump or piece of wood lying anywhere near an infested tree will
always be full of them; and, as has before been pointed out, many of
the larvie of the first brood, at least, spin up in the dry ground. I will
again refer to the Dermestid larve mentioned before, not only as de-
stroying the pupa of Carpocapsa but likewise the larva, during the
summer season at least. Many apparently sound cocoons when cut
open will be shown to contain larve and skins of some of these beetles.
The contents have been devoured while there is no visible hole in the
cocoon, showing that the larva had entered while young. This alone
would not be sufficient evidence, but I have also found small larvee of
Trogoderma tarsale within the cocoons, and with the larve, dead and
living, of Carpocapsa.
In two instances the half dead Carpocapsa larvee showed small holes
in their sides which had partly healed up. These no doubt were made ,
by the Dermestid larvie, which as a rule feed upon dry insect remains,
and only kill living larvie gradually by feeding upon the skin only at
first. In many cases they were found with larve that had recently
died, having already undergone several molts within the cocoons of the
last larvee. They are very abundant, especially around Alameda, as
many as four or five large larvee being often found within the cocoon and
feeding upon the dead pupa of Leucarctia acrewa. In almost any old
egg-mass of Orgy.ia they are found. Whether they will feed upon the
eggs or not I have as yet no evidence. Insect collections are not as
much troubled by these beetles in California, especially in the valleys,
as in the Eastern States. I have often observed them, however, to in-
fest collections in the mountainous districts. A coleopterous (Clerid ”)
larva was recently found in the Sonoma Valley feeding upon Carpo-
capsa, but has not yet been bred. Numerous Carabid beetles were
always found at the base of trees awaiting their chance to get a bite at
the Carpocapsa larve. The most numerous of these were Pterostichus
californicus Dej. and Calathus ruficollis Dej. A bright light with a
white sheet below and behind was kept burning near the orchard in the
Santa Cruz Mountains while the moths were abundant. One female
Jd
only was caught in this about one hour after dusk. Never before dur-
ing my fourteen years of collecting moths with lights, sweeps, ete.,
have I, within my memory, collected a single Carpocapsa.
THE HESSIAN FLY.
(Cecidomyia destructor.)
This insect has been quite abundant and destructive to grain in the
central part of the State during the season. A Mt. Kden correspond-
ent wrote to the Oakland Engineer, May 2, as follows:
The Hessian fly has done irreparable damage to the grain in this vicinity. There
has been hardly a field that has not been attacked. The prospect for a large barley
crop is very good. The wheat crop will be a comparative failure. What is left from
the Hessian fly is being destroyed by the rust.
Personally, until this spring, I have had no opportunity of making
any observations upon this insect. On May 26, while in the Santa
Cruz Mountains, it was noticed that some of the barley had fallen
to the ground. On examination, puparia of the Hessian fly were found
in places where thestraw was fallen. The insect was found at the time
in all stages from young larvze to puparia, and some of the latter had re-
cently hatched. From puparia collected at the time, flies made their
appearance until the beginning of July. Other puparia coilected
about July 1 have not hatched up to date, and the insects are still in
the larval state within the puparia. A few specimens of parasites
(Merisus destructor) were bred from these, and from the same straws
several specimens of an Jsosoma.
During September, 1887, I found puparia, which I took to be those of
the Hessian fly, on two species of grasses near here. These were for-
warded to Washington, where they arrived in good condition, as stated
in letter of October 3d, and the grasses were determined as Hlymus
americanus and Agrostis sp. Again during the summer I found the
puparia upon several species of grasses in the Santa Cruz Mountains.
I shall be prepared next season to give a list of grasses upon which the
Hessian fly is found, and also more accurate notes as to the habits of
this insect, which, as it would appear, is a very old resident of this coast.
JOINT-WORMS.
(Isosoma sp.)
These insects have been abundant and destructive in most wheat-
growing sections, and they will continue to be numerous until stricter
measures are employed for burning the straw and stubble.
LOCUSTS.
These did not appear in any large numbers except in the northern
part of the State and, from some accounts, in Oregon. On my visit to
Shasta Valley, Siskiyou County, at the end of July, locusts were no-
94
ticed in large numbers north of Edgewood and throughout that valley.
At Montague I was informed that, on account of the unusually dry sea-
son and the crickets and grasshoppers, the crop had been an entire
failure in that district. Around this latter place no vegetation except
a few sage-bushes were visible. Along the creeks, where a little grass
and vegetation was still growing, the locusts were swarming. Dissos-
teira obliterata Thos. was abundant throughout the valley. Even in
places where for a half a mile not a shrub or any dry plant was visible
they appeared to be happy, but were seen abundantly along water-
courses and places still affording some food. Melanoplus cinereus Seudd.
was more numerously represented in places where food was still to be
had, even if dry. But few specimems of M. femur-rubrum DeGeer
were seen, while M. packardii Scudd. was the most abundant of all,
feeding upon grasses along streams, and in all the meadows, where it
outnumbers ail the other species put together. Here they were often
observed, always the female, caught in the web of a largespider, which
* feeds upon them.
M. devastator Scudd. was not met with throughout the summer, while
Camnula pellucida Scudd. was only seen occasionally in the places vis-
ited. Another numerous species in the Shasta Valley was Hesperotettix
pacificus Bruner, but this was found feeding upon sage-bushes only.
About eight other species of locusts were found at Montague, of which
Dissosteira carolina Linn., Trimerotropis fallax Sauss., Conozora wal-
lula Scudd., and Stenobothrus coloradus Thos., were the most abundant.
Two species of large crickets have been very numerous at Montague
also joining in the destructive work—Anabrus simplex (?) Hald., and the
other a species of Steirovis. The common cricket, Gryllus luctuosus
Serv., was abundant in the central part of the State, often coming in
large numbers into cities and into houses.
REPORT ON NEBRASKA INSECTS.
By LAWRENCE BRUNER, Special Agent.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
LINCOLN, NEBR., Nor. 20, 1889.
Sir: In presenting a report on the insect injuries in Nebraska for the past spring
aud summer, if isnot my intention to mention all the species that have been observed
in the act of depredating. Neither do I expect to enter upon a discussion of their
life histories. To do this would require altogether too much time and occupy con-
siderable more space than could be allotted to such insects as have been repeatedly
described in your various reports upon injurious insects. Suffice 1t, then, for me to
mention briefly a few of the species that most attracted my attention, either by their
appearance in unusual numbers, their more than ordinary injuries, or by their pecul-
iar mode of attack.
During the year most of the well-known species that are always present in more or
less injurious numbers, were noticed at their regular seasons of appearance. These
were, of course, expected; and, unless either very numerous or scarce, were but little
noticed. Aside from these, few new or original observations were made during the
active season; but several new enemies were observed to act in connection with old
and well-known forms.
Since my last report, some time has been devoted to the Acridide@ of North America,
in the continuance of our work upon that family of the order Orthoptera. The latter
work was chiefly in the line of looking up the matter of distribution, the character-
izing of new material, and the massing of such additional species as could conven-
iently be obtained without expense to the Department. Some little was also done in
this connection in the study of several minor locust outbreaks in different parts of
the country, as, for example, in Utah, Minnesota, and the White Mountain district of
the New England States. Of these different outbreaks you already have been ad-
vised; Mr. Otto Lugger, of the Minnesota Experiment Station, reporting on that of
his State; Mr. C. L. Marlatt, that of New Hampshire, and myself upon that of Utah.
LAWRENCE BRUNER.
Prof C2 Ve RILEY,
U. S. Entomologist.
FALSE CHINCH BUGS.
Karly in the year, during the month of May, two or threespecies of small
hemipterous insects began to gather upon several farms just outside
the city limits of Lincoln. These appeared in much larger numbers
than is usual for the insects under consideration ; and from their size,
99
96
order, and general appearance were mistaken for the chinch-bug (Miecro-
pus leucopterus) by many of the residents. This mistaken identity in
the case of thesé insects was the occasion for much apprehension, as it
well might have been had that insect put in its appearance in such
great numbers so early in the year. These “false chinch-bugs,” for
such they were, began work by attacking the weeds and everything
else that was green growing in the fields which were infested. The
weeds soon disappeared and the insects transferred their attention
to apple, catalpa, mulberry, and other small trees. But by far the great-
est injury was done to grape-vines. They were all small, and were kept
divested of every vestige of new growth for a time, and looked as if
the vines never would be green.
The three insects which united in these demonstrations were the fol-
lowing: the False Chinch-bug (Nysius angustatus), the Purslane bug
(Geocoris bullata), and a species that is quite common here in the West
among various rank-growing herbs and weed-like plants, and is known
to the entomologist as’ Trapezonotus nebulosus.
The first named of these was by far the most numerous, and if work-
ing singly would have occasioned nearly the same amount of damage
as did the three. The second and the last named were present in
nearly equal numbers, perhaps the last being the commoner of the two.
All three species gathered upon the main stems and larger branches of
the trees and even in clusters upon the scattered remnants of the last
year’s vegetation. They were pretty well scattered over the fields, but
appeared to be most numerous upon some hill-slopes where they had
been attracted during early spring and late fall by the warm sunshine.
These clusters of bugs were composed of individuals of all ages and
sizes, ranging from those apparently but a few days old to those fully
matured and winged. An investigation soon disclosed the reason for
their abundance in this particular locality. Last year these fields had
been permitted to grow up in weeds after the spring cultivation. These
weeds, purslane, tickle-grass, stink-grass, and tumble-weeds, made a
splendid retreat for the bugs to gather, feed, and breed in, and afterwards
to winterin. The present spring being dry weeds and grasses were slow
in starting. Not so with the bugs. Eggs were laid at the usual time,
these hatched and the little bugs soon exhausted what green vegeta-
tion there was for them to feed upon, and which was very slow in ap-
pearing on account of lack of the necessary amount of moisture. The
trees and vines being deeper rooted sent out their buds and green leaves.
These attracted the hungry hordes of bugs, and were at once attacked
in bud, leaf, and stem, the bugs inserting their beaks and extracting
the sap. The consequence was the injury spoken of above.
As a remedy against the destruction of the grape-vines I suggested
covering the vines, which were small ones, with dirt fora week or ten
days until weeds had an opportunity to grow, after which time there
would no longer be danger, andas a preventive for the future to keep
down the weeds in late summer, especially when the season is a dry one.
4
97
In habit these three bugs resemble the Chinch Bug to a considerable
degree, only that they are earlier in their egg-laying, and that their
food-plants are weeds and other herbaceous plants, rather than grasses.
They also move about on the wing in a similar manner to that of the
Micropus leucopterus. Last spring, on one day in particular, the air was
full of these and other small hemipterous insects. At just what date
this flight occurred I do not remember now, but know it was during the
month of May.
The three species referred to above in connection with the injuries
recorded, all oceur upon ground that has been neglected and allowed
to.grow up to purslane and Amaranthus. The two latter named are
also occasionally found about smart-weed (Polygonum) during late
summer and fall, while the first mentioned is also inclined to be par-
tial to “stink” grass at times.
CUT-WORMS.
Scarcely a year passes without a report of damages from cut-worms
in various parts of the country. Here in Nebraska quite a large num-
ber of the night-flying moths belonging to the genera Agrotis, Hadena,
Mamestra, ete., are often the cause of much worry and not infrequently
the loss of much time and money to the farmer and gardener.
At about the same time that the bugs mentioned above were the most
plentiful and doing their injury to trees, vines, etc., the reports of cut-
worm depredations began coming in to the station from various districts
within and without the city limits. These reports included injuries to
both garden and field crops, and from the fact that they were received
from widely separated localities, the pest was quite general over the
eastern part of the State. Specimens of at least a half dozen distinct
species of the worms were received by me, along with the statement
that they were the authors of the injury. Among these I recognized
Agrotis annexa, A. suffusa, A. messoria, A. saucia, and A. clandestina.
So abundant were several species of these worms that they literally
cultivated the ground at places where they burrowed during day:
time. Nor did the worms content themselves with feeding upon culti-
vated plants alone, but also, in many instances, kept down the weeds.
Here in the city of Lincoln, upon a vacant square that had been used
by the boysas a base-ball ground, and where the ordinary “ pepper-grass”
was growing in profusion, the Agrotis anneva finally succeeded in clear-
ing the ground of this weed. So voracious did the worms become be-
fore maturity that the pepper-grass was even cut off and the stems
drawn into their retreats in the ground, where they might be devoured
during day-time. On cloudy days the worms even ventured forth
to feed openly by daylight, scurrying back into their holes when the sun
came out fora moment. In the hard trampled ground their holes were
smooth-cut and presented a very interesting sight indeed when the occu-
pants issued forth and quickly returned upon the least disturbance, like
23479—No, 22 7
98
some animal of greater intelligence. The larva of this particular spe-
cies of Agrotis is exceedingly active, reminding one not a little of some
of the chipmunks among the rodents.
A second species that much interested meis the larva of an Agrotis sp.
that was exceedingly numerous upon the college farm and adjoining tracts
to the eastward of the city. This latter worm worked on various plants
in the garden, but on the farm showed decided taste for clover. Here
it literally “lived in clover” in large numbers. - The different kinds of
clover growing in the experimental plats suffered much. It was here
that one of the instances above cited of cut-worms cultivating the soil
occurred. ;
The remedies used against these different cut-worms varied somewhat
in their character; but they were chiefly hand picked orcrushed. Many
of the worms also perished from the attacks of predaceous beetles either
in the larval or imago stages, and of parasites of one or another sort.
A few of them also from diseases that resulted from the presence of
fungi or bacteria. The parasitized worms were the result of the eggs
laid by Tachina flies in most cases. The A. anneva larve suffered most
in this respect, on account of their habit of coming out to feed during
the day-time.
ARMY-WORM.
As the State grows older in its settlement the reports of Army-worm
depredations become more frequent year by year. Last year Lreported
the appearance and damage by this insect in the extreme northwestern
part of Nebraska, as well as in portions of southwestern Dakota.
During the present year several localities in northeastern Nebraska
were overrun to a limited extent by the larve of Leucania unipuncta,
None of these areas infested were of very great extent, nor was the
injury committed complete in any of the cases coming to my notice.
Millet and oat fields were the chief sufferers.
A small black fly was bred from larvie received from Mr. J. M. Sey-
more, of Pender, Thurston County. This fly has frequently been ob-
served by me at various points in northern Nebraska, where I have
taken it in my net when sweeping for other insects on the prairie. It
must be a regular enemy of Leucania unipuncta, and perhaps also of
other allied species, since it is by no means an uncommon insect every
year. Others of the flesh-flies (Tachinide) also act as guards against
this insect’s rapid increase, as can readily be seen from the fact that
many of the larvee taken have the eggs of these flies attached to their
bodies.
Visiting again this year the region last year reported to you as hav-
ing the insect present in injurious numbers I was pleased to find that
the Leucania had not appeared in numbers sufficiently great to attract
the attention of those persons who lost crops by their depredations last
year. In fact I am pretty confident in asserting that there are no
grounds for fearing this insect next year, in the State of Nebraska at
least.
99
THE GREEN-LINED MAPLE-WORM.
For the third time, now, many of our soft-maple trees in the city of
Lincoln have been entirely defoliated by the larvee of Anisota rubicunda,
This insect has been steadily increasing for the past three years, and
if it does not‘soon die off by some epidemic disease or is killed by para-
sites the growing of this tree will be very difficult. This state of
affairs is due entirely to the negligence of our citizens in general, who, it
appears, can not be induced to spend the little time necessary for the
destruction of insect pests that attack their shade trees, garden and
farm produce, and flowering plants. The entomologist can not kill all
the insects, good and bad, in the country; neither are his words of
advice heeded in the least when he tells how each insect enemy is to be
gotten rid of by means of the least labor and expense to those who
should be most interested.
THE BLUE-GRASS WEEVIL.
For the past two years Sphenophorus parvulus Gyll. has been in-
creasing quite rapidly in numbers, so that now it has come to be one of
our commonest beetles in the city of Lincoln, at least, if not elsewhere.
From the fact of its frequenting sidewalks, or being concealed under
boards, sticks, and stones that were left lying about on the University
campus, and on lawns elsewhere in the city, I began an investigation as
to its probable breeding place. This study has led to the discovery of
its feeding upon the roots of the common blue-grass (Poa pratensis).
So plentiful has the insect become in some lawns that the sod has been
entirely killed over large patches.
The larva is a short, thick, whitish grub, like those of other species
of the genus, and measures from 4 to 5 millimeters in length when fully
matured. The beetles appear twice a year, 7. ¢.,in the spring and early
fall, the insect probably being double-brooded. Some of the beetles
may come out in fall, while the remainder may lie over winter as pupe.
The fully matured larve were found early in June, while others were
observed last October. Damp and well-watered lawns appear to be in-
fested fully as badly, if not worse, that those that are dryer, although
they do not show the injury nearly so quickly in the former as in the
latter case.
While looking for larve during the latter part of last May, numerous
specimens of a small white ‘“ hair-worm” Mermis or Gordius, or some
allied genus, were found scattered through the soil. These were only
obtained at very damp places under trees on the University campus,
and as a rule were tightly coiled. Whether these would have or had
been in any way connected with the Sphenophorus larve, I do not know,
as I am not sufficiently well acquainted with these forms nor with their
life-histories. Various ground-beetles (Carabide) and their larve cer-
tainly do devour the larvze of Sphenophorus, since the former were also
quite common in the localities where the latter abounded. No experi-
100
ments were carried on with a view to finding a remedy against the in-
juries of this weevil.
THE CORN ROOT-WORM.
(Diabrotica longicornis.)
This insect is becoming alarmingly common in the counties of eastern
Nebraska and those of western Iowa; and, judging from the general
food habits which the imago appears to be developing, it may soon be-
come a much more dangerous pest than we at presentimagine. During
the past summer and fall the beetle has been almost omnipresent, so
common was it in the vicinity of Lincoln. It was found upon a large
variety of plants belonging to different orders. It was beaten from
trees such as maple, box-elder, elm, ash, willow, cotton-wood, and oak.
I found it rather common among the grasses and obtained it in plenty
in gardens where it was feeding upon the leaves of radishes and
turnips, in several instances completely riddling these latter with holes.
As late as September 28, the beetle was still quite active during day-
time, aud quickly took to flight upon being disturbed. In August it
was observed to be nocturnal in its movements, as was to be seen by
the large numbers of the beetles that were attracted to and gathered
about the electric lights. On the morning of the 15th, 260 specimens
of the beetle were taken from the globe of a single are light that hangs
in front of University Hall upon the campus of the State University.
These had all been attracted to and caught in the globe in a single
night. Whether or not these came from the farms in the surrounding
country I can not say. Might not the species work in the roots (for
the larva is a root-borer) of some other plant or plants beside corn?
At any rate it is my present intention to look into the life-history of the
Corn Root-worm a little more closely during next season. It is getting
to be by far too common an insect in these parts for us to be running
chances in dealing with it. Rotation of crops may or may not always
prove to be a remedy against its depredations.
INSECTS DETRIMENTAL TO THE GROWTH OF YOUNG TREES ON “ TREE
CLAIMS” IN NEBRASKA AND OTHER PORTIONS OF THE WEST.
For several years now I have been interested in the study of the insect
pests that render the growing of young trees upon claims entered under
the “timber-culture act” quite a difficult and tedious matter. This
interest in the subject had its origin partly in personal experience and
partly from the numerous complaints of others who have experienced
great difficulty in securing a sufficient growth in their young timber
within the limitations for making final proof. Not infrequently has it
been the misfortune for those striving to gain titles to Government lands
under this act to have their trees completely defoliated for several
years in succession. Nor have these injuries been confined to any single
kind of tree, Since commencing the study of the subject I have either
101
seen or heard of all of the following species suffering alike from this
cause: Ash, Box Elder, Soft Maple, Cottonwood, and Willow. The
honey locust, too, has been subject to defoliation by insect enemies when
growing as hedges upon the uplands of the semi-arid regions west of
the 97th meridian. Some of these trees thus attacked were killed out-
right, while others were set back a year or more by each defoliation.
Several different lines of investigation have been followed in the
study of this subject, viz, the comparative freedom from insect attack
of the various kinds of trees; the influence of topography upon the
growth of each kind of tree, as well as upon the increase and develop-
ment of the insect life thriving upon the tree; also the comparative
abundance or absence of birds and parasitic insects in the different
regions, and what relation these bear to insect depredations. Of course,
when fully carried out in the several lines indicated above, the investi-
gation of such a subject can not fail to be quite extensive and result in
some good to the parties most concerned. For the present paper, how-
ever, only a few of the most important of these insect enemies will be
mentioned, and then only cursorily. Of these there are about thirty
species belonging to the orders Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera,
Orthoptera, and Hemiptera. Most of these insects that I wish to call
attention to are quite general in their distribution, and therefore as
well known to you as they are to those living in the “ tree-claim”
region. My report will then simply consist of a statement as to their
abundance, distribution, and the amount of injury done by each species.
To do this the following table will best express my wishes and at the
same time be least cumbersome. All of the species therein mentioned
have been either observed by myself or were reported by others as
occurring in injurious numbers during different seasons upon tree-
claims located in Nebraska, Kansas, and Dakota.
Insect. Tree. Insect. Tree.
HYMENOPTERA. | Cressonia juglandis A. & | Walnut.
se
Cimbex americana Leach .| Willows. Clisiocampa americana | Most kinds.
Monophadnus barda Say --| Ash. Harr.
Clisiocampa sylvatica Do.
COLEOPTERA. Harr.
Datana angusii G. & R.| Black Walnut.
Lina seripta Fab........-. Willow and Cotton- || Anisota rubicunda Fab -.| Soft Maple.
wood. | Hyphantria cunea Drury) All kinds.
Chrysomela sp ..---------. Do. | Apatela populi Riley..--. On Cottonwood.
Disonycha pennsylwanica | Willow. : DORE cost seen Willow.
Ill. 1p cenacosasecboocee Maple, Box Elder.
Chrysobothris femorata | Box Elder and Maple. || Tortricid (——-) ...-...-- Honey Locust,
Fab. I SDRUNG sone scissile asim Ash.
Lachnosterna(several spe- | All kinds. DOpet ses ceiteces oe ee Elm.
cies). | Tortricid (———) ...------ Boring twigs of Hack-
Epicauta cinerea Forst..-.| Honey Locust, Coffee berry, Box Elder.
Bean. ORTHOPTERA.
LEPIDOPTERA. :
| @eanthus niveus Serv .-.| Stems of various trees,
Papilio turnus Linn ...... Ash. | Ueanthus latipennis Ri- | Stems not so common.
Vanessa antiopa Linn ....| Willow, Elm. ley.
Platysamia eecropia Linn | Maple, Willow, Box || Melanoplus spretus Thos
Elder, ete. | Melanoplus femur-rub- | Foliage of all when
Telea polyphemus Cramer | Maple, Elm, Box El- rum DeGeer. numerous.
der, ete. Melanoplus differentialis
Triptogon modesta A. & S. | Willow, Cottonwood. Thos.
102
Almost all of the above named insects are sufficiently numerous at
times, when working alone, to kill or at least to greatly retard the
growth of the tree or trees upon which they feed. Of course, they do
not all occur at once in any given locality in such overwhelming num-
bers, nor are the injuries the same every year; but quite frequently
two or more of the species are found feeding in company upon the same
tree in numbers sufficiently greatto do harm. In addition to the species
named above there are a great many others that are also known to at-
tack and injure the trees growing upon tree-claims; but these latter
have not yet made their presence so strongly felt as to force us to place
them on the list of insect pests in connection with tree-claim culture.
For a description and life history of many of these the reader is referred
to Bulletin No. 7 of the United States Entomological Commission, en-
titled ‘ Insects Injurious to Forest and Shade Trees.”
Causes for these Insect Injuries.—There is a cause for everything, so
in the present instance we must look for one or a combination of causes
that work together in producing the undue increase of insect life upon
the prairies when new varieties of plants are introduced. A very
superficial survey of the ground will quickly reveal tous some of these
causes.
In the first place, there are always a few dwarfed trees of most of the
kinds that are usually planted upon claims. These trees are scattered
along the water courses, in ravines and gulches, and afew other localities
that are protected from the fires which have annually swept over the
broad prairies for generations. These few trees furnish food for small
colonies of the various species of insects that we have named. There
are always enough of them to very quickly stock aclaim close by upon
which small trees are planted that are to their taste. Then, too, all of
these injurious insects are of a hardy nature, used to a precarious life,
and are strong fliers capable of making comparatively long journeys in
search of food for themselves and their progeny. They are, in fact, the
nomads of the insect world, capable of withstanding the vicissitudes
belonging to a life upon the vast prairies where the more delicate para-
sitic forms could not live or even find shelter. Then, too, their
requirements for quarters in which to pass the long, cold winter months
are less complex than are those of the species that come later on.
In the second place, the country being destitute of groves of timber
among the branches of which insectivorous birds can find shelter and
build their nests most of these insect destroyers are absent. Of course,
the absence of so great a factor as are these birds in the ridding a
country of its insect pests soon becomes apparent in the increase of the
latter and of the accompanying injury done by them. The absence of
groves, too, not only keeps away the feathered tribe, but also prevents
many of the more delicate parasitic and a large number of the preda-
ceous insects from becoming established in the region. The majority
of these latter forms of insects, as before stated, are such as require
ptii—: ni
103
sheltered retreats in which to lurk or to get away from the hot dry sum-
mers and the long cold winters.
In the third place, the comparative aridity of the region where these
claims are located renders the growth of them somewhat slower than
where the precipitation is more bountiful. This slowness of growth,
while it is an advantage in one respect, aids the insect foes to a con-
derable extent in their work of destruction. A rank and rapid growth
places a tree out of danger from external enemies much more quickly
than will aslow growth. At the same time in rank growth a much
greater amount of food is furnished for the same number of insects,
and as a consequence less injury to the tree results than would were
the growth slower.
A fourth cause for the rapid increase among these different insects
in new regions is the absence of such fungoid diseases as are known to
attack and kill various of these pests. After awhile, however, the
germs of these diseases become diffused through the soil, vegetable
débris, and about the encumbering growths, buildings, etc. These
germs are carried around by the elements and other agencies, and in
time some of them find lodgment within the bodies of such insects as
are susceptible to their growth. The result is disease and death.
Comparative Freedom of different Trees fromthe Attacks of Insect Pests.—
Up to the present writing I have not sufficiently investigated this por-
tion of the subject to be entirely positive in my assertions as to the
kind or kinds of trees most nearly exempt from the attacks of insect
foes in different regions. None of them are entirely free; but that there
are trees which suffer less than others in this respect is a well-known
fact, and can be seen at any time where several kinds are growing side
by side or in the same grove. Again, a particular kind of tree might
be troubled in a given locality, while in another it would be compara-
tively free. Some trees also suffer while small, and others are usually
injured after they have gained considerable growth and age. These
variations with regard to insect attacks among different trees, and of
the same kind at different ages, are governed by laws the explanation
of which would require much more time and space than I have at my
command. By looking over the list of insects mentioned above it will
be seen that no reference is made of any species injuring either the
Catalpa or Russian Mulberry. The Ash is affected by three, each of
which at times strips it of foliage while young; the Box Elder by two
or three; the Willow by a dozen or more; the Cottonwood by four or
five; the Soft-Maple by several; the Elm a couple; the Honey Locust
two, ete.
In treating this subject only such insects have been mentioned as
have been ascertained to attack the various trees during their first few
years of growth, and before they have attained any great size. Other
species of insects injure these trees later on; but, asa rule, these latter
104
are less destructive to them save in a few instances. Only a very few
borers work in healthy young trees in this region.
Remedies tried and suggested.—Only a few remedies have been gener-
ally tried against these pests in the region of tree claims, and most of
these were confined to the various methods of ‘“hand-picking” and
crushing. Spraying and dusting with poisons and kerosene emulsions,
or the use of road dust, ashes, air-slaked lime, ete., have been reported
only ina very few instances. Any or all of these methods of warfare when
properly carried on and used intelligently, in accordance with the habits
of the insect that is being fought, will repay one for the time thus
spent.
LOCUSTS OR GRASSHOPPERS.
Aside from several local outbreaks there has been no special damage
done during the year by locusts within the United States. Of course,
you are already acquainted with the particulars in connection with the
local injuries, of which the chief are the following: The Rocky Mount-
ain or migratory species at Nephi City, Utah; the same in Otter Tail
County, Minnesota; and the lesser and red-thighed species in the mount-
ain districts of the New England States. The Utah outbreak was
partly investigated by me at the time (May) of its occurrence, through
correspondence with the Hon. James B. Darton, of Nephi City. That
gentleman supplied me with specimens at different times from which the
insects under consideration were determined. The conclusions at which
1 then arrived were reported to Mr. Howard in your absence. If I
remember rightly, both the Rocky Mountain (Melanoplus spretus) and
the California locust (Camnula pellucida) were found among the material
received from Mr. Darton. The Otter Tail outbreak has been very care-
fully written up by Mr. Otto Lugger, of the Minnesota Experiment Sta-
tion; while Mr.C. L. Marlatt, of the Entomological Division, has reported
on the New England outbreak.
While it is not my intention to devote much time to the subject of
locust abundance and injuries, I do wish to say a few words concerning
the fungoid disease known as Entomophthora caloptent of Bessey. Dur-
ing the present summer this disease has been unusually abundant in
and around the city of Lincoln, Nebr. Several species o1 our native
locusts were attacked by it; but the large yellow one, known as the
Melanoplus differentialis Thomas, was destroyed by the thousands.
Whether the fungus in question was more plentiful than usual, and
did its work of extermination more effectually than during previous
summers; or, whether it was on account of my being surrounded by a
number of students in botany, and located next door to the botanical
laboratory, that attracted my attention to these, 1 do not know. The
impression is, however, that the former is the true explanation. On
the University campus alone, where differentialis hatehed quite plen-
tifully and began doing considerable injury to various small trees and
105
shrubs, there must have been several thousands of the hoppers destroyed
by the disease. Soon after the locusts became fledged some of them
were observed to die after first showing signs of disease. After the
disease first became apparent among the locusts, it spread, or at least
appeared in other portions of the city, the number of dead and dying
locusts increasing daily. So fatal did the disease finally become upon
the University campus that but few of the differentialis escaped to
deposit eggs. I know that three or four of the botanical students each
collected the dead locusts by the-chalk-box full to use as specimens in
their line of work, and for exchange, while I gathered many of them
myself. During the latter half of August, and early in September, at
almost any time one might have secured from fifty to a hundred or
more specimens of the dead locusts in a few moments, by simply going
outside of the science hall a few yards.
So rapid was the final action of the Hntomophthora (or Empusa, as it
has more recently been called) that not infrequently the locusts were
found still in copulation, one or the other of the sex being dead. When
they were found in this condition, the female, though not always, was
the first to succumb. This would not, however, prove anything as to
the comparative fatality of the disease as far as the different sexes are
concerned. There are other matters to be taken into consideration be-
fore we can come to a definite solution of comparative immunity from
attacks upon the different sexes of an insect by a disease like the present.
Just how long a time is required for the full development of the
fungus after an insect is first attacked I am not prepared to state;
neither can I give an account of the various stages through which the
fungus passes during this development from the original spore to the
stage where such spores are reproduced. Nor am f posted as to all
symptoms present during the different stages of the disease occasioned
by the fungus within the tissues of a living locust. All that I know
is, that shortly before death the stricken hopper climbs up some stick,
weed, or blade of grass, to which it clings frantically with its anterior
and middle pairs of legs. When found dead these always have their
head uppermost.
Whether or not invariably fatal I can not say; and imagine that to
ascertain this would be noeasy task. Iam also quite ignorant in refer-
ence to its capability of being artificially spread, since I have had no
opportunity to experiment in that direction. Besides, the disease does
not appear to be common to all species of locusts alike; or if it is, we
do not know it. The subject will bear a much more careful study than
has thus far been devoted to it. From an economic standpoint there is
still a great deul to be learned concerning insect-attacking fungi, as a
few recent experiments in this line clearly demonstrate.
Before leaving the subject of this locust-destroying fungus I wish to
add the following notes, prepared for the present paper at my request
106
by Prof. C. E. Bessey. They will show the most recent views of bota-
nists as to the systematic position of the plant in question :
Entomophthora calopteni Bessey.—The original description of this species appeared
inthe American Naturalist for December, 1883 (page 1280). Itis reproduced here
verbatim:
““T. Empusa stage, not seen.
“II. Tarichium stage : Oospores globular, or from pressure somewhat irregular in
outline, colorless, 36 to 39. in diameter; walls thick (4.), colorless, smooth ; pro-
toplasm granular, after as if composed of many small cells, often with a large round
vacuole. Occurring as a clay-colored mass {n the body cavity and femora of Calop-
tenus differentialis.
“Ames, Iowa, August and September, 1883.”
Specimens of this fungus collected in Wisconsin by Trelease and Seymour were
distributed under the name given above by Ellis and Everhart in North American
Fungi, No.1801. In April, 1888, Mr. Roland Thaxter published, in the Memoirs of
the Boston Society of Natural History, an important paper on The Entomophthorx
of the United States, in which he revises the species of the group, and adopts the
older generic name Lmpusa, first proposed by Cohn in 1855, in preferenceto Ento-
mophthora proposed by Fresenius in 1856. Moreover, Mr. Thaxter concludes that the
fungus described above is identical with one described as Entomophthora grylli, by
Fresenius, in 1856. Specimens of this species were distributed in 1885 by Dr. Farlow,
in Ellis’ North American Fungi, No. 1401. Our species thus appeared in Mr. Thaxter’s
paper under the name of Hmpusa grylli (Fres.) Nowakowski.
——— ss
Mgeria tipuliformis, 86.
JEsculus californicus, 89.
Agallia flaccida, 29.
4-punctata, 28.
sanguinolenta, 29.
Agriotes mancus, 51.
Agrostis, 93.
Agrotis annexa, 97.
clandestina, 89, 97.
cochranii, 88.
crenulata, life-history of, 89.
herilis, 43.
messoria, 88, 97.
saucia, 82, 97.
suffusa, 97.
Atlotria tritici, 71.
Allygus irroratus, 30.
Amaranthus, 97.
Anabrus simplex, 94.
Andropogon divisitiflorus, 59.
Anisopteryx vernata, 74.
Anisota rubicunda, 99, 101.
Anowala varians, 51.
Anthrax parasitic on Agrotis herilis, 44.
Aonidia aurantii, 7.
Apatela populi, 101.
Aphidius avenaphis, 71.
Aphids, abundance in Missouri, 70.
found on wheat, 70.
Aphis avene, 74.
mali, 70.
persice, 80.
n. sp. on roots of wheat, 70.
Apple, 75, 79, 86, 88, 90, 96.
Arbutus menziesii, 85.
Army Worm in lowa, 20.
Indiana, 45.
Nebraska, 98.
parasites of, 46, 98.
the fall. 46.
Arsenic, experiments with, 80.
Arundinaria tecta, 59.
Ash, 100, 101.
Aspidiotus aurantii, 7, 10, 14, 17.
Aster, 82.
Barley, 57, 93.
Bassus sycophanta, 71.
Bats capturing Codling moths, 91.
Beans, 52, 82.
Bean's Eureka insecticide, 17.
Beet, 76.
Bessey, Prof. C. E., description of Entomophthora
calopteni, 106.
INDEX.
Bittacus near stigmaterus destroying Crambus,
48.
Blackberry, 74.
Blissus leucopterus, 41, 55, 96, 97.
Blue Grass, 19, 42, 99.
Blue Grass Weevil in Nebraska, 99.
Box-elder, 74, 100, 101.
Bruner, Lawrence, Report by, 95.
Buckeye, 89.
Buckton, quoted, 69.
Bythoscopus sanguinolentus, 29.
siccifolius, 29.
Cabbage, 52, 73.
Butterfly, 76.
Curculio, 73.
Worm, 81.
Calathus ruficollis, 92.
California Insects, Report on, 85.
Caloptenus femur-rubrum, 22, 44, 94, 101.
Camnula pellucida, 94, 104.
Canker worms in Missouri, 74.
Carpocapsa (see Codling moth).
Catalpa, 103.
Ceanothus, 87.
cordulatus, 88.
thyrsiflorus, 88.
Cecidomyia destructor, 93.
Celena renigera, 82.
Ceratochloa australis, 37.
Ceuthorhynchus rape, 73.
Chenopodium album, 76.
Cherry, Wild, 87.
Chinch Bug, 41, 96.
Injuring grasses in Iowa, 21.
In Indiana, 55.
Unequal distribution in Indiana, 55.
Influenco of rain-fall, 58.
Fungus disease of, 60.
Chionanthus virginica, 79.
Chrysanthemum, 75.
Chrysobothris femorata, 101.
mali, 86.
Chrysomela sp. injurious to Willow, 101.
Chrysopa larve feeding on Phylloxera rileyi, 83.
probably destroying Codling moth eggs,
91.
preying on Wheat Aphis, 71.
Cicada coccinea, 28.
Cicadula exitiosa, 30.
Cimbex americana, 101.
Cladius isomera, 78.
Clisiocampa americana, 101.
ca liforaica, 87.
107
108
Clisiocampa constricta, 87. Elymus americanus, 93. s
erosa, 87. Empusa grylli, 106. ;
fragilis, 87. Encyrtus websteri, 71.
strigosa, 87. Entomological notes from Missouri for 1889, 73.
sylvatica, 101. Entomophthora disease of the Chinch Bug, 60.
thoracica, 87. Entomophthora calopteni, 104, 106.
Clover, 19, 47, 75, 82, 98. grylli, 106. {
-seed midge in Iowa, 19. Epicauta cinerea, 101. '
Coccinella 9-notata, 64, 72. Epitrix cucumeris, 19.
Codling moth in Missouri, 75. Eragrostis megastachya, 37.
California, 89. Erax larva, probably parasitic on White Grub, 51.
parasites of, in California, 8,90. Eriosoma? cornicola, 37, 39, 40.
Coffee bean, 101. 2 fungicola, 37, 38, 40.
Colorado potato beetle, experiments with, 80, 81. European Cabbage Butterfly in Missorri, 76. )
Conozoa wallula, 94. Eureka insecticide, experiments with, 17.
Contopus virens, 48. / Fabricius’s original description of Aphis corni, 36.
Coquillett, D. W., Report by, 9. Fall Army Worm, 46. : 4
Coriscus ferus, 26. False Chinch Bugs in Nebraska, 95.
Corn, 43, 46, 47, 48, 52, 53, 57, 100. Fertilizing salt, experiments with, 59.
Sweet, 76. Flea-like negro-bug in Missouri, 75.
Corn root-worm in Nebraska, 100. Fluted Seale, 9, 12.
Cornus, 33. Four-pointea Agallia, 28.
sanguinea, 36. Foxtails (see Setaria).
sericea, 39. Fungus disease of Chinch Bug, 60.
Corymelina pulicaria, 75. ° grasshoppers, 104. i
Cosmos, 75. Gas treatment for Scale insects, 9.
Cottonwood, 100, 101. Geocoris bullata, 96.
Jottony Cushion Seale, 9, 12. | Gortyna nitela, 47, 75.
Crambus exsiccatus, 18. Grain Aphis in Indiana, 64.
Severe outbreak in 1889, 64.
Influence of temperature and moisture, 65.
laqueatellus, 18, 48.
zeellus, 47, 48.
Cressonia juglandis, 101. Cool temperature favorable to its develop.
Crucifere injured by Phyllotreta vittata, 73- ment, 68.
Cucumber, 76, 22. Eflicacy of parasites, 69.
Currant, 86, 88. Notes on life-history, 69.
Cut-worm, a new, 47. Enumeration of natural enemies, 71.
Cut-worms in California, 88. Other species of Aphids found on wheat, 70.
Towa, 18, 20. Grain fruits, insects injurious to, 7, 42.
Nebraska, 97. Grape, 86, 96.
Dactylis glomerata, 71. Grass, 19, 20, 34, 93, 100.
Dahlia, 75. Hungarian, 41.
Datana angusii, 101. Timothy, 45.
winistra, 44, 45. Grasses, insects injurious to, 7, 20, 41.
Destructive Leaf-hopper, 30. Grass-root Plant-louse, 32.
Diabrotica 12-punctata, 19, 52, 76. Grasshoppers in Iowa, 21.
longicornis, 100. fungus disease of, 104.
soror, 87. Green-lined Maple. worm in Nebraska, 99.
vittata, 19. Gryllus luctuosus, 94. 7
Diamond soluble bone, experiment with, 48. Hackberry, 101. ; °
Diedrocephala coccinea, 27, 28. Hadena stipata, 47.
mollipes, 26. Halticus pallicornis, 82.
noveboracensis, 27. Hesperotettix pacifieus, 44.
versuta, 27. Hessian fly in California, 93.
Dipterous parasite of Army Worm, 98. new food-plants of, 93.
Diabrotica soror, 87. Ileteroptera infesting grasses, 41.
Disonycha collaris, 76. ilieroglyphie Leaf-hopper, 28.
pennsylvanica, 101. Hippodamia convergens, 72.
Dissosteira carolina, 94. glacialis, 72.
obliterata, 94. parenthesis, 72.
Dogwood Plant-louse, 20, 32. 13-punctata, 72.
Its identity with the grass root-louse, 32. Tfoney Locust, 101.
Doryphora 10-lineata, 80. Hopper Dozers recommended for Leaf-hoppers,25.
Drasterius dorsalis, 52. Hungarian grass, 41.
elegans, 52. Hurtful Leaf-hopper, 31.
Drymeia sp. parasitic on Army Worm, 46. Hydroecyaniec gas treatment, 9.
EJm, 74, 100. Hyphantria cunea, 101.
109
- Icerya purchasi, 7, 9, 12.
Ichneumon brevicinctor, 46.
Insects affecting grain fruits, 7, 42.
grasses, 7, 20.
young trees on western
claims, 100.
injurious in California, 85.
Iowa, 18.
Missouri, 73.
Nebraska, 95.
Insecticides, experiments with, 9, 48, 80.
Bean's Eureka insecticide, 17.
hydrocyanic acid gas, 9.
London purple, 19.
Paris green, 30.
Petroleum emulsion, 19, 80.
Resin soaps and compounds, 10.
Salts, 50, 51.
White arsenic, 80.
Various substances, 48.
X. O. Dust, 19, 80.
Towa, insects injurious in, 18.
Ischnodemus falicus, 41.
Isocrates vulgaris, 71.
-Isosoma sp. destructive in California, 93.
tritici, 42.
Jassus inimicus, 31.
Kerosene emulsion, 19, 80.
Koebele, Albert, Report by, 85.
Lachnosterna larva destructive in Indiana. 48.
injuring young trees in the West,
101.
Laphria tergissa destroying Varying Anomala, 51.
Laphygma frugiperda, 46.
Leat-hoppers affecting grass in Iowa, 21.
Appearance and habits, 23.
Amount and nature of damage, 22.
Remedies, 23.
Enumeration of species observed, 26.
Lecanium ole, 13.
sp. on dogwood, 34.
Leuvania unipuncta (see Army Worm).
Leucarctia acraa, 92.
Lina scripta, 76, 101.
Linden, 74.
Locust injury in 1889, 104.
Locusts on the Pacific coast, 93.
London purple and Kerosene emulsion, 19.
Long Bug, 41.
Luperina stipata, 47.
Lygus lineatus, 75.
pratensis, 75.
Madrona tree-borer, 85.
Maple, 74, 100, 101.
soft, 99, 101.
Maple Worm, the Green-lined, 99.
- Meadows and pastures, insects injurious to, 20, 48.
Megaspilus niger, 71.
Megilla maculata, 72.
Megoura sp. found on rye, 71.
“Melanoplus cinereus, 94.
devastator, 94.
differentialis, 101, 104.
femur-rubrum, 22, 24, 94, 101.
packardii, 94.
spretus, 101, 104.
tree
Melaxanthus salicis, 20.
Meromyza americana, 42.
found on grass in lowa, 19.
Merisus destructor, 93.
Micropus leucopterus, 41, 55, 96, 97.
Millet, 98.
Miris atftinis, 41.
Monophadnus barda, 101.
Mulberry, 96.
Russian, 103.
Murtfeldt, Mary E., Report by, 73.
Myzus sp. found on wheat, 71.
Nasturtium, 76.
Nebraska, insects injarious in, 95.
Nemorza leucania, 46.
New Rose Slug, 78.
Life-history, 78.
Description of larva, 78.
New York Leaf-hopper, 27.
Nomophila noctuella, 18.
Nysius angustatus, 96.
Oak, 82, 87, 88, 100,
Oats, 52, 57, 98.
Oecanthus latipennis, 82, 101.
niveus, 101.
Céstlund, O. W., quoted, 38.
Olive, 86.
Ophion purgatus, 46.
Orchard grass, 71.
trees, 74, 75.
Osborn, Prof. Herbert, Report by, 18.
Pachyneuron micans, 71.
Palthis angulalis, description of larva and pupa,
no:
Panicum, 33, 63.
anceps, 59.
glabrum, 37, 38.
prolificum, 59.
viscidum, 59.
Papilio turnus, 101.
Paspalum fluitans, 59.
leave, 59.
Passerini, quoted, 37.
Peach, 74, 75.
Pear, 75, 90.
Bartlett, 90.
Peppergrass, 73, 97.
Phosphate salt, experiment with, 49.
Phyllotreta vittata, 73, 80.
zimmermanni, 80.
Phylloxera rileyi, notes on, for 1889, 82.
Pieris protodice, 76.
rapx, 76.
Pimpla annulipes, 90.
Pipizapulchella possibly preying on Chinch Bug,
64,
Plagiodera scripta, 76, 101.
Platysamia cecropia, 101.
Plum, 74, 86.
Plum curculio in Missouri, 74.
Poa pratensis, 42, 70, 99.
Podabrus tomentosus, 72.
Podura found on radishes, 74.
Polycaon confertus, 85.
Polygonum, 97.
Populus, 76,
110
Post Oak, 82.
Prunus demissa, 87.
Pterostichus californicus, 92.
Purslane, 97.
Bug, 96.
Quercus agrifolia, 87, 89.
conomensis, 87.
obtusiloba, 82.
Radish, 73, 100.
Rain-fall and temperature in Indiana, 66, 67.
Raphidia destroying Codling Moths in Califor-
nia, 92.
Red-backed Leaf-hopper, 28.
Red Scale of California, 7.
methods of destroying, 9.
Red osier dogwood, 37.
Resin soaps and compounds for Scale insects, 10.
Rhopalosiphum n. sp. found on wheat, 70.
Rhubarb, 74.
Rocky Mountain Locust, 101, 104.
Rose, 78.
Rose slug, anew, 78.
Ryan, F. G., experiment with resin washes, 13.
Rye, 46, 57, 70, 71.
Sage bush, 94.
Salts, experiment with, as insecticides, 49, 50, 51.
Schizoneura corni, 20, 32, 33, 36.
crategi, 19.
panicola, 33, 38, 40.
venusta, 37, 40.
Scirpus atrovirens, 53.
‘Scoliopteryx libatrix, 46.
Selandria rose, 78, 80.
? sp. injurious to White Fringe, 79.
Setaria, 33, 41, 63.
glauca, 37, 61.
italica, 37.
viridis, 37.
Shade trees infested by Apbids, 74.
Siphonophoraavene, 64, 74.
Smart-weed, 97,
Spherophoria cylindrica, 71.
Sphenophorus ochreus, 52.
parvulus, 99.
Spinach, 76.
Spinach beetle, 76.
Life-habits and history, 76.
Description of larva and pupa, 77.
Squash, 76.
Stalk-borer, 75.
Steiroxis sp., 94.
Stenobothris coloradus, 94.
Stink-grass, 97.
Strawberry, 75.
Streaked Cottonwood Beetle, 76, 101.
Swamp Sphenophorus in Indiana, 52.
Sweet corn, 76.
Systeechus oreas, 44.
Tarnished Plant-bug, 75, 81.
Telea polyphemus, 101.
Telephorus carolinus, 72.
Tenderfoot Leaf-hopper, 26.
Tent caterpillars of the Pacific coast, 87.
Tettigonia hieroglyphica, 28.
4-vittata, 28.
Thomas, Prof. Cyrus, quoted, 37, 38.
Thorn-tree Aphid in Iowa, 19.
Thrips found on blue grass, 19.
larve feeding on Phylloxera rileyi, 83.
Timothy grass, 45.
Tortricid injurious to Honey Locust, 101.
boring twigs of Hackberry and Box-
elder, 101.
Toxoptera n. sp. found on wheat, 70.
Trapozonotus nebulosus, 96.
Trees on western tree claims, insects injurious
to, 100.
Trichogramma pretiosa, 8.
Trimerotropis fallax, 94.
Trioxys sp. parasitic on Grain Aphis, 71.
Triptogon modesta, 101.
Trogoderma tarsale, larva feeding on Codling
moth pupe, 92.
Tropxolum, 76.
Turt Web-worms in Iowa, 20.
Turnips, 73, 100.
Twelve-spotted Diabrotica, 52, 76.
Tychea panici, 38.
Uhler, Prof. P., quoted, 26.
Uniola latifolia, 59.
Van Duzee, E. P., quoted, 29, 30.
Vanessa antiopa, 101.
Varying Anomala, 51.
Vedalia cardinalis, 8, 9, 85.
Walsh, B. D., quoted, 37.
Walnut, 101.
Black, 101.
Washes for Scale insects, 7, LU.
Wavy-spotted Leaf-hopper, 30.
Wavy-striped Flea-beetle, 73.
Webster, Prof. F. M., Report by, 42.
Weed, Clarence M., quoted, 39.
Western Striped Cut-worms, 43.
Interesting parasite on, 44.
Wheat, 42, 51, 52, 57, 64, 70, 71, 93.
Wheat stem maggot, 42.
straw worm, 42.
wire-worm, 51.
White arsenic, experiments with, 80.
White Fringe tree, 79.
White Fringe Slug, 79.
Description of larva, 79.
White grubs in Indiana, 48.
Iowa, 20.
experiments for destroying, 48.
Wild Cherry, 87.
Willow, 87, 88, 100,101.
Willow Plant-louse, 20.
Wire-worm injuring wheat, 51.
Wood Pewee destroying Crambus moths, 48.
Xanthogramma emarginata, 71.
X. O. Dust, experiments with, 19, 75, 80.
°
a.
~
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
£ DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BULLETIN No. 23.
RC Eeei@rker S
OF
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
THE PRACTICAL WORK OF THE DIVISION,
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST.
(PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.)
(
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
ar Sg rs
"eis ae eo ‘ ie @ om eye 4 oh om ae ; i Laeed . ; my. % . 9 ites
(Ore Ro eshiny qiete yal | d a Paras ne vide sere =) bee Oe a gh nega arstele ae 1 00 v perianal We wu liiamircer cnglpar dia crands tewedi toms 9 Pe SUiLeae Andrew atace ap emery Sh dimen: onsite A Heer de
WE ae Py " ae
Pe ey tend i ietaiaee ey ee Sted Seal) mor
eter a oe Nea aie oe
O)
o>. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.
BuuuetTiIn No. 23.
hs Ouse S
OF
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
IN
- lie
j = Os,
MADE l. eg coal B
Ee ae
ch Yr . , ©
(= 2) — 2
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE ENTOMOLOGISE, Gy &
(PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.)
a
WASHINGTON,
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
I8g1.
CONTENTS.
EEITERRAOR, SUBMITTAL © jcossiccic sins siesisica cis via sninsmaiesisecessisiecscnssice es neice
LEN DRODUCTIONIAcicc Citeeca viet Poeaen fa arte PCR ike wee ‘ Ce ~
; ; . = A 5 f S
he aa Ys Re iV Bice) eho epee, oot pa
= ~ nea Ps
Sie) yo PAs . atl \ Pitre aoe bE. an Pe
: ay
“ re avve I POET sts rat a)
- ? aiak Ys >
a Ly | vy vs ¢ & Ys «{ rs S08. tp ae Ay 2) _
i 7 ’ ,
j . : rz *.
es a. vj hag Se tA Aree ee ee oe
: sud a kh Sea
7 ‘ " 2 %
= FP) is -
1
i” .
2
‘ -
, =
i”.
+
= 0% a
4 ‘
'
a
y
f
4
i
ee
.
,
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL,
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., January 3, 1891.
Str: I have the honor to submit for publication Bulletin No. 23 of
this Division. It comprises the reports of the field agents of the Division
for the past year (1890), a summary of which has been included in your
annual report.
Respectfully,
C. V. RILEY,
Entomologist.
Hon. J. M. RUSK,
Secretary of Agriculture.
- - <2
ay \ 2 tay ee tt 4
oe Oi il ahs - 36 ? ete Peay Pa ae = |
— = j a . : ‘ Prone
a) » 4 7
it
ty ix =f
4 :
e .
a
* =
-
iy .
~s
a
”
= i
2 :
INTRODUCTION.
The reports of the six permanent field agents of the Division are in-
cluded in this bulletin. They are printed this year in full, but it should
be understood that they are little more than summaries of the work in
general performed by each one. Special reports upon specific subjects
have from time to time been sent in by special direction, and these
have been published in INSECT LIFE.
Mr. Lawrence Bruner, who last year reported upon the insects inju-
rious to young trees on tree claims, has the present season devoted
much of his attention to insects affecting, or liable to affect, the Sugar
beet, a crop of growing importance in the State in which he is located.
Although but one season’s collecting has been done, some 64 species
have been observed to prey upon this crop. As has been shown, nearly
all of these can be readily kept in subjection by the use of the kero-
sene emulsion or the arsenites.
Mr. D. W. Coquillett’s report is mainly devoted to methods and ap-
paratus for the destruction of scale insects by means of fumigation.
The experiments were aimed at the Red Scale, which is one of the most
difficult to treat with washes. He describes the simplified tents, the
rigging which enables them to be used rapidly, and shows theadvantage -
of excluding the actinic rays of the light. Judging from recent Cali-
fornia newspapers the use of this method of fighting scale-insects is
rapidly increasing and the comparatively expensive apparatus is al-
ready owned by a large number of fruit-growers. This improved
method is the legitimate outgrowth of experiments which we instituted
at Los Angeles in 1887, and possesses the advantage over spraying that
itcan hardly be-done in a slovenly manner. If used at all its effects
are nearly complete.
Mr. Albert Koebele, while reporting upon a number of interesting
fruit pests, notably the Tent Caterpillars of the Pacific slope, and a
Noctuid larva which destroys the buds of certain fruit trees, devotes
most of his report to the description of certain tests, which I directed
him to make with different resin compounds against the Grape Phyllox-
era in the Sonoma Valley during September and October of the past
year. The results have been fully as satisfactory as we anticipated, and
the economy of the process is very striking, labor being practically the
only expense.
ai
8
Miss Mary E. Murtfeldt reports upon the insects of the season in
eastern Missouri, and also gives the results of experiments which she
has made with certain insecticides submitted to her from this office for
trial. She also presents descriptions of four Microlepidoptera, gees
are new in the role of feeders upon Apple.
Prof. Herbert Osborn reports upon the insects injurious to forage-
crops, meadows, and pastures in his State. His report last year was
mainly taken up with the consideration of the Leaf-Hoppers, to which ~
he gives some further consideration this year, adding some notes on
locusts and crickets. He presents also a series of miscellaneous obser-
vations.
Mr. F. M. Webster devotes his report mainly to the Hessian Fly, dis-
cussing the number and development of broods, the effect of the larve
upon plants, the effect of the weather on the development of the fall
brood, and preventive measures. He also gives some notes upon three
of the species of Plant-lice, found commonly upon wheat.
In presenting this bulletin for publication, I desire to thank these
agents for the care with which they have followed out instructions and
for the intelligent manner in which they have conducted these investi-
gations.
C. V. Be
REPORT ON NEBRASKA INSECTS.
By LAWRENCE BRUNER.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
LINCOLN, NEBR., October 16, 1890.
Sir: Herewith is submitted a report of my work in Nebraska for the yearas special
field agent of the Division of Entomology of the United States Department of Agri-
culture.
In addition to my observations on the general insect depredations within the State,
I have incidentally given some time to the study of such insects as were taken upon
the sugar and other beets during the summer.
This special study was undertaken at the suggestion of our experiment station
director, who was quite anxious that “‘ beet insects ” should be made the subject of
a special bulletin to be issued from the station some time during the coming winter.
I accordingly include herewith a brief summary of the results of this special study.
Yours truly,
LAWRENCE BRUNER,
Field Agent.
Prof. €: Vi. RILEY,
U. S. Entomologist.
The past summer has not been particularly noted as one in which
insect depredators were especially abundant or destructive to the vari-
ous crops that are raised in the State. In fact, taking the State as a
whole, the injuries from this source have been rather less than is usually
the case. No one species, so far as I have been informed, has been a
pest during the year. The Corn Root-worm (Diabrotica longicornis),
while it has spread some since my last report, was much less abundant
than last year. Cut-worms did not appear in early summer so univer-
sally over the State, nor did they do anything near the damage they
did the year past. No Army-worm depredations have been reported at
the station, nor have any come to my own observation; while the Corn
Ear-worm (Heliothis armigera) has been less destructive in most portions
of the region along the Missouri River.
If any one insect has been on the increase and has caused more in-
jury than usual, it was the almost universal Codling Moth (at least
universal wherever apples are grown or eaten). But if this insect has
hecome apparently more widespread within this region than it was
9
10
formerly, it is quite consoling to know that the warfare against it has
also become more genera]. Almost every fruit-grower has at last come
to the forced conclusion that warfare against this insect, at least, has
become an absolute necessity, and has accordingly instituted a rigor-
ous fight against it. The arsenious spray is the almost universal
remedy resorted to with our fruit-growers here in Nebraska, as it is
in other localities. Either London purpleor Paris green are the poisons
used, and where applied properly always result favorably to the or-
chardist.
THE GREEN-STRIPED MAPLE WORM.
The Green-striped Maple-worm (Anisota rubicunda) appeared quite
numerously again in the towns and cities of Nebraska, and has done
much injury to the Soft Maples (Acer saccharinum) growing along their
streets. Here in Lincoln, the first or spring brood of larve was suffi-
ciently numerous to defoliate many of the largest trees before they
had become fully matured, and in that manner proved to be quite
effectual towards self-extermination. Many of the larve actually
starved to death; while others were so weakened from starvation that
they either died in the chrysalis state, or else were so exhausted when
they emerged as moths that there was but little egg-laying for a sec-
ond brood. Some of the neighboring cities and towns were less for-
tunate, and had a much more plentiful: fall brood of the larve, and
hence will be well supplied with the insect next spring unless something
unforeseen prevents it.
Considerable has been done inthe way of remedies by the citizens of
Lincoln against the second brood. Many of the moths were gathered
and destroyed before they~had time to deposit their eggs and later on
in the season spraying the trees with London purple and Paris green
was resorted to with good results.
While a moderately dry summer usually has the tendency to increase
the number of most of our injurious insects, several such years imme-
diately following one another have the opposite effect. So it has been
with the summer which has just closed. The drought was so very
marked that even the more hardy insect life was sensibly affected by
its severity. Such species as had been favored by the scarcity of their
more frail parasites during several years of moderate drought, this year
were themselves, to a certain degree, sensibly affected by its continu-
ance and severity.
LOCUSTS OR GRASSHOPPERS.
Locusts or grasshoppers of several species. were quite numerous in
certain localities, especially in cities away from the destructive influ-
ence of fowls and such other predaceous animals as are always at hand
in the country ready to “ gobble up” various insects. These locusts did
some damage, of course, but not nearly so much as was done by them
11
last year. Whether this decrease in their numbers has been due to
parasites or to disease, I can not say.
One noticeable fact in connection with the subject of insect depreda-
tions, in this particular region at least, is the growing interest which
the general public is taking, and the tendency on the part of the people
to help themselves against this host of insect enemies which is assailing
them on all sides. Whether this interest is traceable to any particular
source, or whether necessity is the awakening factor, I can not say. I
trust, though, that my work in this direction has not been entirely in
vain.
BEET INSECTS.
Iiver sinve the Sugar Beet industry was first agitated here in the
West, and now especially since the project has assumed such a prae-
tical form, it has become of general interest. For several years now the
cultivation of the sugar beet has been a theme for much speculation,
and to some extent also of experimentation. Now that a large factory
has been built at Grand Island in this State, the sugar beet is to be one
of our regular crops year after year. It will no longer be a plant that
is grown out of mere curiosity or simply for experimentation.
It has been ascertained in connection with the culture of the sugar
beet that certain insects show a tendency to attack and injureit. In
this respect the beet is not any different from other cultivated plants;
or, for that matter, wild or native ones also. In fact, it- is too evident
that certain ones of these insect enemies seem to prefer this “new”
- crop to any of these which have been cultivated in the same region for
a considerable time.
It was therefore thought here at the experiment station, early last
summer, that it might be well, as far as practicable in connection with
other lines of work, to give some attention to these insect enemies of
the sugar beet. Accordingly the following ‘press bulletin” was sent
out over the State:
SUGGESTIONS IN REGARD TO THE SUGAR-BEET CULTURE.
Reports from the sub-stations established in the spring by the State Experiment
Station for the purpose of determining the effect of the varying conditions of the
soil and climate on the growth of and the production of sugar in the Sugar beet are
in the main good.
In many places, especially in the extreme western part of the State, beets have
suffered from hot weather and a lack of rain; asarule, though, they seem to withstand
these unfavorable conditions as well as corn and better than small grain.
From some points reports tell us that insect enemies have begun their ray-
BOOS ee
As there are several kinds of insects that attack the beet, and as they have already
been reported as having begun operations, it seems the proper time to begin to learn
something of their appearance, habits, and the best means of meeting their advances.
To this end the beets should be watched very carefully, from day to day and at dif-
ferent times of the day, and even in the evening, for any insect, bug, or worm that
seems to have an interest in them; search the leaves, pull up the beets and search the
12
roots and the top layer of the soil, and when any marauder is found send it to the
experiment station for study and identification.
Directions for sending such specimens I copy from Bulletin XIV on “Insects Inju-
rious to Young Trees on Tree Claims,” just issued:
‘‘ Whenever possible, insects should be packed alive in some tight tin box—the
tighter the better, as air-holes are not needed—along with a supply of their appro-
priate food sufficient to last them on the journey ; otherwise they generally die on
the road and shrivel up.
‘Send as full an account as possible of their habits; what part of the plant they
infest, time of day when they are most active, amount of damage done, ete.
‘Packages should be marked with the name of the sender and should be addressed
to the entomologist of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Lincoln, Nebr.”
It will aid very materially in forming conclusions if all people who have planted
seed this season will send from time to time reports of the conditions of their beets
to the experiment station,
Address:
H. H. NicwHoxson,
Agricultural Experiment Station, Lincoln, Nebr.
The very dry summer may have had considerable to do towards
influencing much of the insect injury to the beets grown within the
region designated, and some species of insects may have worked upon
this plant that ordinarily would not have done so. In many localities
various insects were observed to congregate among the leaf stems just
above the ground that could not have been there for mischief, since —
they were such forms as do not feed upon growing plants. Especially
was this true in portions of the State where the drought was severest
and where other refugees from the burning sun and parched soil were
scarce or entirely wanting. In many of these localities a great variety
of insect life was always sure to be found hidden away during the day-
time in such places. Not only beetles but also representatives of such
other orders as the Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, Neuroptera, Orthoptera,
Diptera, and Lepidoptera were quite common in such localities. Even
many water-inhabiting forms frequently occurred in company with the
others,
Of course all of these insects that were found on or about the roots
of the beets were sent in to the station both by the field agents and
by the various correspondents, who took an interest in the investiga-
tions under way. To separate most of these “refugees” from such
other forms as might possibly be there for mischief was, of course, quite
easily done at the station by those who were accustomed to the habits
of most of the insects under consideration. A few of them were, how-
ever, more difficult to single out, and required Special study to decide
positively, which in nearly every case was accomplished.
In the study of this subject it was quickly demonstrated that almost
all of the insect enemies of the sugar beet, as well as of the common
garden and other varieties, were either weed feeders or else were such
as are very general feeders. It was also ascertained that nearly if not
quite all of the insects of whatsoever description that attack other
13
Chenopodiaceous plants, as the various species of “tumble weeds,”
the “pig-weed,” Atriplices, etc., the purslane and other juicy weeds,
as also many of those that attack the various Crucifere and Solanacesx,
will also feed upon the beet. Not a single species of insect has thus
far been reported by any of the agents of the station, or by correspond:
ents, that is exclusively a beet feeder. Every one of them has been as-
certained to attack some one or more of the other plants that are also
common to the region. Only a very few species have appeared in num-
bers sufficiently great to be what could be termed ‘‘ destructive” to the
beet within the region covered by these studies or investigations; and
these few are of such a nature that they can be readily combated.
In their modes of attack upon the beet these various insects, so far
as they have been studied, are either leaf-feeders or root-borers, 7. ¢.,
they either attack the foliage which they devour or from which they
suck the juices by inserting their beaks, or they bore into or gnaw the
roots. Later on in our investigations we may find that there are others
that will attack the seeds and seed stems. In either of the former cases
the result is an injury to the beet, whether it is being cultivated for the
table, for feeding to stock, or for the manufacture of sugar. Should
future study reveal others that attack the seed of the beet these latter
would of course be of direct injury to the seed industry since much
seed will necessarily have to be raised to provide for the large crops
that are required each year for sugar.
Having now become fully convinced that the cultivation of the Sugar
Beet is not without its drawbacks here in the West, and that there are
insects which we must contend against and overcome in raising this
crop, as well as in the raising of corn, wheat, and potatoes, we see
the necessity of beginning our fight at once if we would prevent much
future loss. By prompt action in the beginning, when the enemies are
few in numbers and less generally distributed, we will have a much
easier time of it; besides, our losses from this cause will be infinitely
smaller than if we neglect them and permit them to go on increasing
and spreading unmolestedly.
The following list embraces all such species of insects as were either
found to injure the beet here in Nebraska or else have been recorded
by others as attacking this plant within the region referred to:
List OF BEET INSECTS.
Species that attack the Leaves.
LEPIDOPTERA.
1. Spilosoma virginica, Fab.—The larva of this very common insect, is one of
the first noticed to injure the beet. It also infests a large number of other
plants.
2. Spilosoma isabella, Abb.—The larva, like that of the preceding, attacks the beet
and many of our common weeds.
3. Mamestra picta, Harr.—Larva occasionally attacks the leaves of beet and other
garden plants.
6.
10.
dt.
16.
ive
18.
19.
20.
21.
2
wo
14
. Eurycreon rantalis, Guen.—The larva of this small Pyralid moth is one of our
most destructive beet insects. It is the oneusually known as the Garden Web-
worm; and also attacks a number of other plants among which are the “ Pig-
weed,” the tumble weed, purslane, etc.
. Mamestra trifolii, Rott.—Larva quite common on beets; and sometimes doing
considerable injury by gnawing away the leaves and the entire tops of small
plants. Also a purslane insect.
Plusia brassice, Riley.—The larva occasionally attacks the beet, but more com-
monly the turnip, cabbage, and other Cruciferex,
. Deilephila lineata, Fab.—Larva found feeding on beet leaves in Lincoln, Nebr.,
by Mr. H. Marsland. A very common purslane insect.
. Copidryas gloveri, G. and R.—Taken several times on the leaves of beets which it
had eaten more or less. An abundant purslane moth.
. Agrotis, spp.—Several species of these ‘‘ cut-worms” are occasionally quite de-
structive to the beet while it is still small. They work more or less all summer,
but are most destructive early in the year. They cut off the plant just at ora
little below the surface of the ground. Some of them also work upon the leaves
above the ground.
Teucania unipuncta, Haw.—The Army Worm, when it is abundant, does consider-
able damage to beets and other garden plants by eating their foliage.
Botis pesticata, Grt.—The larva of this moth is said to be quite destructive to a
number of plants here in the West. ‘‘In 1873 we found the larve feeding
upon Helianthus, Ambrosia, potatoes, and beets, skeletonizing and ruining the
plants for miles along the Neosho Valley and throughout Kansas,” writes Pro-
fessor Riley in the U. 8. Agricultural Report for 1883,
ORTHOPTERA.
. Melanoplus femur-rubrum, DeG.—Occasionally injuring the leaves of beets and
other vegetables.
. MW. atlanis, Riley.—When common, a general feeder, at least upon the products
of the garden and farm—beets of course included.
. MW. spreius, Thos.—Attacks the beet during times of invasions. Sometimes en-
tirely eating away the leaves and portions of root that protrude from the
ground.
. M. differentialis, Thos.—When plentifui it occasionally does some injury to the
foliage of the beet and other garden plants.
M. divittatus, Say.—Where beets are planted on low ground or are growing
close to some rank vegetation, it attacks their tops, but never does much
damage.
Dissosteira carolina, Lin.—Found feeding upon the tops of sugar beets during the
month of July, at McCook, Nebr.
Trimerotropis latifasciata, Scudd.—Taken in company with the preceding, also
feeding on sugar beets.
Spharagemon cwquale, Scudd.—Several specimens were received daring the sum-
mer from McCook and Ravenna, Nebr., with the accompanying statement to
the effect that they fed on the sugar beet.
Pezotettix olivaceus, Scudd.—I have seen this hopper in beet fields several times
under such circumstances as led me to think it feeds upon that plant. It is also
quite partial to Helianthus and Chenopodium.
COLEOPTERA,
Diabrotica 12-punctata, Oliv.—Quite common on the leaves of beets, which it in-
jures by gnawing holes in them.
Disonycha triangularis, Say.—The beetle feeds upon the leaves of beets and other
Chenopodiaceous plants. Sometimes quite common here in the West.
ake
15
23. D. cervicalis, Lec.—Has similar habits to the preceding, but is less abundant.
24. D. xanthomelena, Dalm.—Common on beets and other Chenopodiaceous plants,
the leaves of which it riddles with holes,’
25. D. crenicollis, Say.—One of the 5-lined flea-beetles that occur here in moderate
numbers; is also occasionally taken on beet leaves at Lincoln, Nebr.
26. Systena frontalis, Fab.—Found feeding upon beet leaves on the College farm, Lin-
coin, Nebr.; also on the leaves of Hibiscus militaris at West Point, Nebr.
27. S. teniata, var. blanda, Melsh.—A very numerous species in all parts of the State
from which beet-feeding insects have been received. It literally riddles the
leaves of beets with pit-like holes, in some instances entirely destroying the
leaves of quite large plants. I have also taken it upon white clover, purslane,
and amaranthus. This is liable to be one of our most destructive beet insects
here in the West, especially in Nebraska.
28. Psylliodes convexior, Lec.—Another of the flea-beetles that is very abundant on
the leaves of beets in some portions of Nebraska, and which works in a soine-
what similar manner to the preceding.
29. Chetocnema denticulata, Illig.—I found still another of our small flea-beetles at
work on the beets growing on the State farm here at Lincoln, although in much
fewer numbers than either of the two species preceding.
Epitric cucumeris, Harr.—This small flea-beetle was found to be quite abundant
at Ashland, Nebr., where it was taken by Mr. T. A. Williams, upon the potato,
Solanum nigrum, and the beet, the leaves of all of which were more or less
closely riddled with holes.
Epicauta pennsylvanica, DeG.—This black plisierhectias injures the leaves of quite
a number of plants, prominent among which are the potato, ‘‘ pigweed,” and
beet. It has been received at the station from central and western Nebraska
as one of the most destructive insects attacking the plant.
32. Epicauta cinerea, Forst.—Another of these blister-beetles was found here at Lin-
coln by Mr. Herbert Marsland, who said it almost ruined a small bed of beets
growing in his garden. I have also collected the same species from one of the
wild beans and several other native plants.
33. Epicauta maculata, Say.—This insect has been received from Medicine Lodge,
Kans., and from Grant and Neligh, Nebr., where it was found to injure the
sugar beets by feeding on the leaves. It isa very common insect here in the
West upon quite a number of the Chenopodiaceous plants, and especially upon
the various species belonging to the genera Chenopodium and Atriplex,
34, Epicauta vittata, Fab.— This striped blister-beetle is also a beet insect; and has
- been received from Ogalalla, this State, where it was reported as doing much
damage to sugar beets. It also is quite a general feeder. Among its food plants
ate to be mentioned the Solanacesx, some of the Leguminose, and I have found
it to be quite destructive to several of the Sagittaric.
35. Epicauta cinerea, var. marginata.—This large black blister beetle also frequently
gathers upon vegetables of different kinds in the semi-arid regions east of the
Rocky Mountains, but chiefly upon beans. I have taken it on beets once or
twice here in Nebraska.
36. Cantharis nuttalli, Say.—During the late summer and early fall of 1888 this in-
sect was very destructive to garden plants, beets included, in the Black Hills
of South Dakota. It also abounds in the western and northwestern parts of
Nebraska.
Colaspis brunnea, Fab.—This small leaf beetle, which appears to be quite a gen-
eral feeder, has been taken on several different occasions upon the beet both by
myself and different ones of the field agents, and also by some of the correspond-
ents. ;
Epicerus imbricatus, Say.—The Imbricated Snout-beetle has been known to attack
the beet among the many other plants upon which it feeds. It is a general
feeder.
30
31
37
38
39
40.
41.
42,
43,
44.
46.
47.
49,
50.
51,
52,
16
Centrinus penicillus, Hbst.—Another of the Snout-bettles that attack the beets
here in the West is the one known to the entomologist by the above name. It
gnaws small holes in the leaf-stem, and when numerous does considerable harm
to the plants attacked. Whether or not the insect breeds here I was tunable to
ascertain.
C. perscitus, Hbst.—Still a third species of weevil was found upon the beets grow-
ing on the State farm. It isa much commoner insect than penicillus, and works
in a similar manner upon the leaf-stem.
Apion, sp.—This little Apion was taken on the leaves of beets here at Lincoln on
two separate occasions.
Doryphora10-iineata, Say.—The Colorado Potato-beetle was brought into my office
at different times during the summer by those who reported its having been
captured on the leaves of beet which it was “ certainly eating.”
HETEROPTERA,
Blissus leucopterus, Say.—The Chinch Bug has quite frequently been taken by
me upon beet tops in company with several others of the plant bugs. Whether
or not it was there only temporarily, I can not say; but suppose it was, since
all of our leading economic entomologists assert that its food-plants are limited
to the grasses.
Piesma cinerea, Say.—A very common bug on the beet and various others of the
Chenopodiaceous plants. Sometimes doing much damage to the leaves of the
former.
. Nysius angustatus, Uhl.—Another bug that often gathers upon the beet and other
garden plants is what is called the False Chinch-bug. When numerous it
often does considerable harm to the plants which it attacks. It is also one of
the weed insects that enjoys a wide range.
Geocoris bullatus, Say.—The Large-headed False Chinch-bug, or Purslane Bug, is
also much addicted to infesting the beet here in Nebraska. In fact it has been
received from all over the State as one of the commonest of insects infesting
the beet. It is also a great weed bug.
Trapezonotus nebulosus, Fall.—This bug also frequents the beet and several other
Chenopodiaceous plants. It is especially partial to the Pigweed (Chenopo-
dium album) here in Nebraska.
. Emblethis arenarius, Linn.—Taken several times on the beet in company with the
preceding. This insect also is a frequenter of localities where Chenopodium al-
bum is growing. The species also occurs about the roots of “Stink Grass”
(Eragrostis major).
Lygus pratensis, Linn.—Probably one of the most general feeders among the true
bugs, and sometimes a very destructive enemy of the beet. It occurs through-
out the entire North American continent in the temperate regions.
Euthoctha galeator, Fab.—This bug has also been taken several times on the beet
in the vicinity of Lincoln, Nebr. I have collected it also from the wild cucum-
ber (Echinocystis lobata).
HOMOPTERA.
Agallia siccifolia.—This little leaf-hopper, which seems to be especially partial to
the different species of Amarantus and Chenopodium and allied weeds, is also
equally fond of the beet, at least such would appear to be the fact, judging from
the large numbers of the insect that are invariably to be found upon this plant
all through the summer. It occurs in all stages.
Immature forms only.—Found in moderate numbers on the sugar beet at Grant,
Nebr., a rather large leaf-hopper, which also occurs upon the Amarantus and
Chenopodium,
17
53. Allygus sp.—This prettily marked leaf-hopper is very partial to Chenopodium al-
bum, on the under side of the leaves of which it breeds throughout the summer.
This insect also attacks other species of the same genus, those of the genera Ama-
rantus and Montilia, etc. Besides these it is very frequently found on the beet.
Characteristic marks of its presence are the rather large purplish spots that are seen
upon the leaves of plants that have been punctured by its beak.
54. Lrythroneura sp.—Another small, slender, green leaf-hopper that is occasionally
met with upon the beet.
55. Athysanus (? sp.).—Still another of these leaf-hoppers that is found upon the beet.
56. Liburnia intertecta.—There is still a sixth of these leaf-hoppers that has been taken
on the beet here in Nebraska; and which presumably also does some injury to that
plant by sucking its juices.
57. Aphis atriplicis, Linn.—Mr. T. A. Williams tells me that he has taken this plant-
louse on the beet at Ashland, this State, where it was quite common during the
year.
58. Aphis cucumeris, Forbes.—This past summer Mr, Williams also took what he de-
termined to be the Aphis cucumeris, Forbes, breeding quite abundantly upon some
beets that grew right by the side of some cucumber vines that had been infested
by the same insect.
59. Siphonophora pisi, Kalt.—The same gentleman tells me that he has also taken the
common garden aphid here at Lincoln, on the beet. He found it in the pupa and
winged stages.
Species that attack the Root.
COLEOPTERA.
60. Ligyrus gibbosus, De G.—This beetle has been quite destructive to the sugar beet
over limited areas towards the western part of the State during the present season.
It attacks the root, into which the mature insect gnaws great holes, sometimes
entirely imbedding itself. It worked most on old ground and where irrigation was
resorted to. It worked on the roots from the surface to a considerable depth but
most at about 3 or 4 inches below the surface. In some instances it reached a depth
of fully 7 inches below the surface.
61. Lachnosterna fusca, Fréh.—Not unfrequently the common white grub attacks the
roots of the beet, and does injury to the plant in that way. ‘There are very likely
several kinds of the ‘‘ grub” that are concerned in these attacks, since almost every
locality has its particular species of ‘‘ June bug” that predominates in numbers.
62. Wire Worms.—Several of the larvze of ‘‘ snapping beetles,” or click beetles, are
also to be charged with injuring the roots of beets in some localities.
63. Unknown larva.—On two different occasions during the past summer I found beets
that had been attacked by some unknown larva just below the surface of the
ground, and from which the depredator had already escaped. The work resem-
bled that of an insect that works in the roots of different “tumble weeds” and
causes them to break off. The larvee are rather short, thick, whitish grubs with
brownish heads, about one-fourth of an inch in length, slightly largest in the mid-
dle; possibly the larva of some snout beetle.
UNCERTAIN.
64. Silpha opaca, Linn.—This insect has been taken several times by me in beet fields,
and in gardens where beets were growing. In Europe the insect is said to be quite
injurious to the beet crop, by attacking and devouring the leaves. Whether or not
it has the same habit in this country I can not say.
In addition to the above list of insects that are known to actually
attack one or the other varieties of beet there are several others that
25910—Bull, 23 2
18
have been taken so frequently upon that plant, and under such pecu-
liar circumstances, that they, too, may preve to beits enemies. Among
these latter I would mention several of the Eleodes, one Collops, and
several Diptera.
REMEDIES THAT CAN BE USED AGAINST BEET INSECTS.
It will be quickly seen by any one who has taken the pains to go
over the foregoing list, that in nearly every case, at least so far as men-
tioned here, the insect enemies of the beet are identical with those that
work upon our common garden weeds, or else they are such as are very
general feeders. It will also be observed that most of them are
leaf-feeders; ¢. ¢., they nearly all attack that portion of the piant
above ground. These being the facts in the case, the remedies that at
once suggest themselves are simple. A spray of some kind scattered
over the plants will be effectual as well as economical. The beet tops
are seldom utilized for food, either for man or beast. Hence for pro-
tection against insects with gnawing mouth parts that attack them an
arsenical spray can be used, whilst for such as receive their nourish-
ment by means of a sucking mouth the kerosene emulsion will answer
the purpose. This latter remedy will also be effective against No. 27,
as has been demonstrated by actual experiment by at least one of our
correspondents, who writes that “The kerosene emulsion which you
directed me to try on my beets against the flea-beetles was a perfect
success.”
A direct as well as useful remedy is the careful destruction of all
such weeds as furnish food for the same insects that attack the beet.
Clean culture in this case becomes doubly necessary. First, to prevent
the appropriation by the weeds of nourishment that should be taken by
the beets, and secondly, to give less room for the propagation of inju-
rious insects.
REPORT ON VARIOUS METHODS FOR DESTROYING SCALE
INSECTS.
By D. W. CoquiLLert, Special Agent.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
Los ANGELES, CAL., October 8, 1890.
Sir: I herewith submit my annual report for the season of 1890. The Australian
lady-bird (Vedatia cardinalis Mulsant) recently introduced by this Division, success-
fully survived the winter unprotected out of doors, and as early as the month of
March I was able to distribute several colonies to those requesting them. Lest this
species, after exterminating the Fluted or Cottony-cushion Seale (Icerya purchasi
Maskell) should become extinct on this coast, our State Board of Horticulture, at the
suggestion of its president, Hon. Ellwood Cooper, has erected two propagating
houses over two large orange trees belonging to Col. J. R. Dobbins, in the San Ga-
briel Valley ; in these houses the Vedalias are to be propagated and distributed to
those requiring them. At the present writing it is no easy matter to find a single
living Icerya anywhere in this part of the State, although in the early part of the
season they appeared in limited numbers in a great many places; later in the season
the Vedalias also appeared in considerable numbers, and by sending colonies of these
to the different localities where the Iceryas had appeared, the latter were effectually
held in check.
The Red Scale (Aspidiotus awrantii Maskell), so destructive to Citrus trees in certain
jocalities, is rapidly reduced in numbers through the agency of the treatment with
hydrocyanic acid gas, described in my previousreports. This treatment is now being
largely used for the above mentioned purpose, and is giving far better results than
have ever been obtained by the use of any kind of a spray ; numerous instances have
occurred where, upon large Citrus trees treated with this gas, neither myself nor other
parties were able to find a single living Red Scale, either upon the bark, leaves, or
fruit—a result which so far as I am aware has never been obtained by the use of any
kind of aspray. The cost of treating trees with the gas is scarcely greater than that
of using a spray, while the method has been so greatly simplified that trees can now
be treated with the gas very nearly as rapidly as they can be sprayed. Ihave not as
yet learned that any person, or even a single domestic animal, has ever been acci-
dentally injured either by the gas itself or by the materials used in producing it. All
of the objections which at first were urged against the use of this gas—the danger of
being poisoned by it or by the chemicals used, the great expense attached to its use,
and the impracticability of operating the tents—have finally been overcome, and the
treatment is now in successful operation.
In my last report I gave an account of the spraying of a number of orange trees
at Orange according to instructions. These trees were not again sprayed until the
lapse of a little over one year, At this latter date the trees were again badly infested
19
20
with the Red Seale ( Aspidiotus awrantii Maskell), although these were not so numer-
ous as they were at the time that I had them sprayed a little over one year previously.
The oranges when gathered in the following spring were quite free from the scales,
none of them having been rejected by the purchaser on account of being too badly
infested with these pests. Those who depend upon spraying for ridding their trees
of these scales usually spray their trees twice a year, in March or April, and again
in August or September, although some growers perform these operations only in the
autumn, the second spraying being given to the trees about two months after the
first.
During the past season I have received numerous favors from you, especially in
the matter of identifying insects, for all of which please accept thanks.
Respectfully yours,
D. W. CoQuiLLeTt.
Prom ©. Va KODE,
United States Entomologist.
THE GAS TREATMENT FOR THE RED SCALE.
The process of treating trees with hydrocyanic acid gas for the de-
struction of scale insects (Family Coccid) is now being extensively
used in southern California, not only in the orange groves, but also in
the nursery where the imported trees are subjected to this treatment
for the purpose of ridding them of insect pests. In Orange County
alone fully 20,000 orange and lemon trees have been subjected to this
treatment the present year in order to free them from the red scale
(Aonidia aurantit Maskell).
_ Since the year 1887 various accounts of this process have been pub-
lished in some of the Annual Reports and Periodical Bulletins of this
Department.*
But as these are somewhat scattered, and include an account of the
various improvements that have been made from time to time, I have
thought it desirable to give in this place a brief account of this process
as at present used in actual field work, including in the account such
improvements as have been made since writing up my last report upon
this subject. Briefly speaking, this process consists in covering the
infested tree with an air-tight tent and afterward charging the tent
with hydrocyanic acid gas. The material commonly used in the con-
struction of the tent is what is known as blue or brown drilling. A
few persons have used common ducking in place of the drilling, but
this is much inferior to the latter; in the ducking the threads of which
it is composed extend only lengthwise and crosswise, whereas in the
drilling they also extend diagonally—this belonging to the class of
goods to which our merchants apply the term “ twilled”—and for this
reason the drilling is both stronger and closer in texture than the
ducking. ;
*See Annual Report United States Department of Agriculture for the year 1887,
pp-123-142; and 1888, pp. 123-126, Also InsEcr Lire, vol. 1, pp. 41,42 and 286; and
vol. 11, p. 202-207,
21
After the tent is sewed up it is given a coat of black paint, as it has
been ascertained that tents treated in this manner last longer than
those which have been simply oiled with linseed oil. Some persons mix
a small quantity of soap suds with the paint in order to render the lat-
ter more pliable when dry, and therefore less liable to crack. Instead
of thus painting the tent some persons simply give it a coating made of
an inferior grade of glue called “ size,” first dissolving this in water and
then covering the tent with it, using a whitewash brush for this pur-
pose. Sometimes a small quantity of whiting or chalk (carbonate of
lime, Ca Co;),is added to this sizing with or without the addition of lamp-
black. A few make use of the mucilaginous juice of the common Cactus
(Opuntia engelmanni Sali.) for this purpose; to obtain this the Cactus
leaves or stems are cut or broken up into pieces, thrown into a barrel
and covered with water, after which they are allowed to soak for three
or four days; the liquid portion is then drawn off and is ready for use
without further preparation. Tents which I saw that had been pre-
pared with this substance were to all appearances as air-tight and pli-
able as when prepared in any other manner.
A tent 26 feet tall by 60 feet in cireumference—a size large enough to
cover the largest orange tree now growing in this State—if made out of
drilling, and either painted or sized, as described above, will cost com-
pleted about $60. Where the trees to be treated are not more than 12
feet tall the tent can be placed over them by means of poles in the
hands of three persons; to accomplish this, three iron rings are sewed to
the tent at equal distances around and 6 or 7 feet from the bottom of
the tent; immediately under each of these rings an iron hook is attached
to the lower edge of the tent. When the latter is to be placed over a
tree each of the hooks is fastened into the corresponding ring above it ;
one end of a pole is then inserted into each of these rings and the tent
raised up and placed on the tree. The hooks are then released from the
rings and the lower edge of the tent allowed to drop upon the ground.
Instead of allowing the tent to rest directly on the tree some growers
use an umbrella-like arrangement, the handle of which is in two pieces,
which are fastened together with clamps provided with pins; this
allows the handle to be lengthened or shortened according to the height
of the tree. This apparatus is put up over the tree and the tent allowed
to rest upon it. By the use of this simple device the danger of break-
ing off the small twigs on the upper part of the tree by the weight of
the tent is avoided. Mr. Leslie, of Orange, used four tents and tent-
rests of this kind, and he informs me that with the aid of two men he
tumigated 120 trees in one night. To remove the tent from one tree,
place it over another, and charge the generator required only one minute
and a half. In the place of poles some persons attach a circle of gas
pipe to the lower edge of the tent; then two men, each taking hold of
opposite sides of this circle, throw the tent over the tree. Dr. J. H.
Dunn, of Pomona, informs me that four men, using six tents like the
22
above, fumigated 240 orange trees in one night, and that the average
for each night was over 200 trees, the latter being 8 feet or less in
height.
Trees over 12 feet tall will require a derrick of some kind for the pur-
pose of putting on the tent and removing it again. For this purpose a
stout mast is erected in the center of a strong framework mounted
upon the running gears of a common farm wagon, the height of the
mast depending upon the height of the trees to be operated upon. This
mast is braced in four directions, and to the upper end of it is firmly
attached a cross-piece, extending transversely to the length of the
wagon, and long enough to reach from one row of trees to another. To
each end of this cross-piece are attached small pulleys, through which
pass ropes which are attached to the tents; by pulling down on these
ropes the tents are drawn up to the cross piece after which the wagon
is drawn ahead until the tents are directly over two of the trees to be
treated; the ropes are then let out and the tents lowered down over
the trees. The ropes are usually attached to the lower edge of the
tents as well as to their apices, and when the tent is to be taken off of
the tree the ropes attached to the bottom of it are first pulled down-
ward, thus drawing the lower part of the tent up to the cross-piece
first, and in a measure tarning the tent inside out. But for this device
it would be necessary to have the cross-piece at least twice the height
of the trees to be operated upon. This apparatus is drawn between
two rows of trees and the trees on each side of it treated with, the gas.
It iscustomary for the men themselves to draw the fumigator from tree
to tree, thus doing away with the use of horses for this purpose. Stout
planks are frequently used for the wheels of the fumigator to run upon.
A fumigator of this kind, without the accompanying wagons and tents,
ean be built for about $15, it being the cheapest and simplest apparatus
ever used for this purpose. It has not as yet been patented, and is
more largely used at the present time than any other kind, operating
the tents successfully even upon the largest orange trees. The first
fumigator of this kind was built by Mr. O. H. Leefeld, a prominent
orange-grower of Orange, and a man who has had considerable experi-
ence as a machinist.
Within the past few weeks a new kind of a fumigator has been
brought out by Mr. W. H. Souther, of Covina, Los Angeles County,
Cal. This, like the preceding one, is mounted upon a common farm
wagon, and operates two tents, one on either side of it. At each end
of this fumigator are four upright posts attached at their lower ends to
the framework, which is mounted on the wagon; the outermost posts
are shorter than the inner ones, and to the upper end of each is attached
a long spar by a hinged joint, which allows the spar to be moved back
and forth transversely to the length of the wagon. The two spars on
one side of the fumigator are connected with each other near their upper
ends by means of a wooden cross-piece, and are drawn back and forth
23
by means of ropes passing through pulleys. The tents are operated by
means of ropes, which pass through pulleys attached to the spars and
cross-pieces described above, there being five ropes attached to each
tent; one of these is attached to the apex of the tent, and passes
through a pulley fastened to the middle of the above-mentioned cross-
piece; two other ropes are attached to opposite sides of the tent, about
midway between its apex and base, and pass through pulleys fastened
to each of the spars near their upper ends; the other two ropes are
attached to opposite sides of the lower edge of the tent and pass through
pulleys fastened to each of the spars a few feet higher up than those
above described. To the bottom of the tent is attached a wooden eir-
cle in several pieces, and the two ropes attached to the bottom of the
tent are fastened to this circle; these ropes are not exactly on opposite
sides of the tent, the space between them equaling about one-third of
the entire circumference of the lower edge of the tent.
In taking the tent off of a tree the two ropes attached to the tent
midway between its base and apex are first drawn downward until their
points of attachment are slightly above the top of the tree, after which
the two ropes attached to the lower edge of the tent are drawn down-
ward until their points of attachment are drawn up against the spars
at the places wliere the pulleys through which these ropes pass are fas-
tened ; the lower edge of the tent at this stage will be perpendicular
to the surface of the ground, and these ropes are further pulled upon
until the spars on this side of the wagon are perpendicular to the
wagon, thus bringing the weight of the tent upon the middle of the
wagon; the spars are prevented from going over backward any farther
by the presence of the inner upright posts referred to at the beginning
of this description. When both of the tents have thus been drawn upon
the wagon the latter is moved forward until the tents are brought op-
posite the next two trees. Before the tents are again let down over
the trees the fumigator is first braced up by means of four long braces
attached to each of the four corner posts at a distance of about 8 feet
from the ground; these are attached in such a manner that they may
be swung out at right angles to the fumigator, or, when not in use, may
be swung around and loaded upon the wagon without first detaching
them. After these four braces are in position the ropes attached to one
of the tents are let out and the tent allowed to fall down over the tree,
a guide-rope being attached to its lower edge to aid in guiding it in its
downward descent over the tree.
Mr. Souther, the inventor of this fumigator, informs me that a fumi-
gator of this kind, without the wagon and tents, could be built for about
$60. He also informs me that a patent has been granted to him upon
this fuinigator.
Besides the above fumigators IT may also mention one which has been
used in a few instances with very good results. It is an extremely
simple affair, consisting of an upright post the lower end of which is
24
attached to a framework on a wagon or sled, while to its upper end is
attached a long stick of timber, the latter being attached near its middle
to the top of the post, like the sweep of an old-fashioned well. The
tent is then attached to one end of the sweep, and by pulling downward
on the opposite end the tent is raised up, and may then be swung
around and let down over a tree.
After the tent is placed over the tree the next step is to charge it
with the gas. The materials used for the production of the gas consist
of commercial sulphuric acid (Ky SO,), fused potassium cyanide (KON),
and water, the proportions being 1 fluid ounce of the acid, 1 ounce by
weight of the dry cyanide, and 2 fluid ounces of water. The generator
is placed under the tent at the base of the tree; it consists of a common
open earthenware vessel. The water is first placed in the generator,
then the acid, and last the cyanide, after which the operator withdraws
to the outside of the tent and the bottom of the latter is fastened down
by having a few shovelfuls of earth thrown uponit. The tent is allowed
to remain over the tree for a period of from 15 to 30 minutes, according
to the size of the tree.
It was found by experimenting that the trees were less liable to be
injured by the gas when treated at night than they were when operated
upon in day time, and at the same time the gas is just as fatal to the
scale insects when applied at night as it would be if applied in the day
time; and indeed it appears to be even more fatal when applied at night.
This is accounted for by reason of the fact that in the day time the light
and heat decompose the gas into other gases which, while being more
hurtful to the trees, are not so fatal to insects. At night the trees are
also more or less in a State of rest, and therefore are not so liable to be
injured by the gas as they would be in the day time, when they are
actively engaged in absorbing nourishment and replacing wasted tissue
with new materials.
Of the different materials used in generating the gas, the most
important is the potassium cyanide; of this there are three grades:
The mining cyanide, commercial cyanide, and the C. P. (chemically
pure). Of these three brands, the mining cyanide is wholly unsuitable
for the production of the gas, and the ©. P. is too expensive; the com-
mercial brand (fused) is the only one that is used for producing the
gas, but even this varies greatly in strength, containing all the way
from 33 to 58 per cent. of pure potassium cyanide. It is, therefore, of
the utmost importance that the operator should know the exact per-
centage of pure potassium cyanide that his cyanide contains, and when
large quantities of it are purchased at one time it would be advisable
to obtain one or more analyses of it by a reliable analytical chemist ;
or if it is not possible to submit the cyanide to such person, an analysis
of it could be made by almost any person accustomed to the use of
chemicals or drugs.
The only substance required for this purpose is the crystals of nitrate
~
25
of silver (AgNO;), which may be obtained at almost any well-stocked
drug store. Dissolve the nitrate in cold water contained in a glass or
earthen vessel, using one-fourth of an ounce (Troy) of the crystals to 1
pint of water; this dissolves ina few minutes, forming a whitish, semi-
transparent solution. The cyanide, when dissolved in water, forms a
transparent, nearly colorless solution; when a small quantity of the
nitrate of silver solution is added to this it at first spreads out in a white
cloud, like milk, but it soon breaks up into small, white, floccy pisces
which gradually disappear upon being agitated, leaving the solution
nearly as transparent as at first; when more of the nitrate of silver
Solution is added from time to time the above process is repeated, ex-
cept toward the last, when the cyanide solution becomes somewhat
milky, but it still remainssemitransparent, permitting the operator to see
quite clearly the bottom of the vessel containing the solution. As soon
as a sufficient quantity of the nitrate of silver solution has been added
tothe cyanide solution thelatter immediately becomes white and opaque,
like milk, completely concealing from view the bottom of the vessel con-
taining it. This completes the operation, and the quantity of nitrate
of silver solution used will indicate the strength of the cyanide tested,
When absolutely pure, 53 grains of the potassium cyanide dissolved in
water will require 1 fluid ounce of the above nitrate of silver solution
before the turbidity occurs, indicating that the cyanide is 100 per cent.
strong; if only one-half of a fluid ounce of the nitrate of silver solution
produces this turbidity, this indicates that the cyanide in only half
strength, or 50 per cent. strong; if only one-fourth of a fluid ounce is
required, then the cyanide is 25 per cent. strong; and so forth. The
nitrate of silver solution should be added to the cyanide solution very
slowly, the latter being agitated by gently shaking it each time that
any of the nitrate solution is added. Wherever any of the nitrate of
Silver solution comes in contact with the skin or nails of the hand it
produces a reddish or black stain which can easily be removed by wash-
ing the stained part in a solution of potassium cyanide and water; this
will quickly remove the stain without causing any injury to the parts
affected, except, of course, when the stains occur upon a sore or cut in
the hand, in which case it would be very dangerous to apply the cyanide
to these places.
It sometimes happens that the percentage of cyanogen (CN or Cy)is
given, instead of the percentage of potassium cyanide (KON or KCy);
but in cases of this kind the percentage of cyanide can be readily ascer-
tained by always bearing in mind that two-fifths of a given quantity of
potassium cyanide is cyanogen. Thus if a certain brand of cyanide
contains 24 per cent of cyanogen, this is equivalent to 60 per cent of
pure potassium cyanide. Potassium cyanide when absolutely pure
(equal to 100 per cent.) contains 40 per cent. of cyanogen; and, there-
fore, no grade of cyanide could contain a larger percentage of cyano-
gen than this.
26
The potassium cyanide used for producing the hydrocyanic acid gas
is principally manufactured by two firms: Power & Weightman, of
Philadelphia, Pa., and the Mallinkrodt Chemical Works, of St. Louis,
Mo. That made by the first named firm is the most largely used ; when
purchased by the ton the price is 36 cents per pound for the grade con-
taining about 57 per ceit of pure potassium cyanide, packages and
carriage extra. It is put up in tin cans holding 10 pounds each, and
also in barrels holding about 400 pounds each. That in the cans is
much to be preferred, since the quantity in each is so small that it will
soon be used up after the can is opened; whereas, the barrel contain-
jug so large a quantity, the cyanide used toward the last will have lost
much of its strength by contact with the air. It is customary to weigh
out the cyanide in small paper parcels, and mark each parcel with the
number of ounces of cyanide that it contains; then when the tree is to
be fumigated it is an easy matter for the operator to select one of the
parcels containing a sufficient quantity of the cyanide for the tree, thus
saving the trouble of weighing out the cyanide as it is to be used for
each tree. As the fumigating is done only at night the weighing of the
cyanide is frequently done by the ladies of the house upon the day pre-
ceding its use.
The quantity of cyanide to be used on each tree will, of course, de-
pend not only upon the size of the tree but also upon the strength of the
eyanide used. The following table will aid in determining the proper
quantity of each ingredient to be used on different sized citrus trees,
the cyanide being about 58 per cent pure:
Height Diameter Sulphuric | Potassium
of tree. | of tree-top. Water. acid. cyanide.
Feet. Feet. Fluid ozs. | Fluid ozs. Ounces.
6 4 3 4 A
8 6 2 1 1
10 8 43 24 24
12 10 8 4 4
12 14 16 8 8
14 10 10 5 5
14 14 19 9h 94
16 12 16 8
16 16 29 144 144
18 14 26 13 13
20 16 36 18 18
22 18 52 26 26
24 20 66 33 33
Not only is this gas fatal to the Red scale (Aspidiotus aurantit Mas-
kell), but also to the San José scale (Aspidiotus perniciosus Comstock),
and indeed to all of the armored scales. It is also fatal to the Brown
seale (Lecanium hesperidum Linn.) and to the Black seale (Lecaniwm
olee Bernard), but the eggs of this species are not affected by it.
The common Red Spider (Tetranychus telarius Linn.) and the Woolly
Aphis (Schizoneura lanigera Hausmann) are also not affected by the gas
when used strong enough to destroy the Red scale, although I have
known it to prove fatal to true spiders (species not determined). House-
flies (Musca domestica Linn.), Lace-winged flies (Chrysopa sp.?), and cer-
27
tain kinds of Ichneumon flies (Ophion macrurum Linn.) are also de-
stroyed by the gas. On one occasion I obtained a cluster of eggs of a
species of Psocus fly (Cacilius aurantiacus Hagen) that were deposited
upon a leaf of a tree before the latter had been treated with the gas,
and from these eggs afterwards issued a number of parasitie flies be-
longing to the family Proctotrupid and to the genus Alaptus; but the
species is as yet undescribed. Various kinds of Lady-birds, which are
in the tree when the latter is treated with the gas, become stupefied and
fall to the ground, but finally recover and are to all appearance none
the worse for their temporary loss of consciousness. Birds, lizards, and
even barn-yard fowls sometimes refuse to leave the large orange trees
while the tent is being let down over them at night, and are therefore
inclosed in the tent and subjected to the gas; the latter proves fatal to
all of these. The small, pale yellow mites which are frequently found
on orange trees, especially beneath the dead scales, are not affected by
the gas; these have a general resemblance to the young of the Red seale,
and several operators, finding these mites still alive after the tree had
been subjected to the gas, came to the erroneous conclusion that the
gas had not been effectual, thinking that these mites were the young of
the Red scale.
From the above it will be seen that the gas treatment is not a sure
specific for every kind of insect pest, but for destroying Red scales on
citrus trees it is far superior to any other method at present known.
THE RESIN WASH FOR THE SAN JOSE SCALE.
During the past winter I carried on quite a series of experiments with
various kinds of washes for the destruction of the San José scale
(Aspidiotus perniciosus Comstock) on dormant deciduous trees, kindly
placed at my disposal by Mr. C. H. Richardson, the inspector of fruit
pests for the Pasadena district, Mr. Richardson also aiding me in mak-
ing many of these experiments. Among all of the washes tried the fol-
lowing gave the best results:
IRESe ata tee scisie aie is aclaece male wancteisc se ace ees arene pounds.. 30
Caustic sodan@i0sper: CENb) cea a. -ress aoe eee een == sees Ones
INGO Gilles ds c6ec 6s ee peS ap eneee PeeHeeeean nopenonee ao ncre pints... 44
Waterenough toimake -.)---- o-ssen eee eee Smee neallons.. 100
For making 100 gallons of the above wash a kettle holding 30 gallons
will be required. Place all of the ingredients in the kettle and cover
with water to a depth of 4 or 5inches, boil briskly for about 2 hours, or
until it will dilute evenly with water, like black coffee, which it closely
resembles in color. When this stage is reached the kettle should be
filled up with water, adding this very slowly at first; the contents of
the kettle can then be emptied into a tank or other vessel, and a suffi-
cient quantity of water added to make 100 gallons. Care should be
taken not to chill the wash by adding large quantities of cold water at
one time.
28
The making of this wash will be greatly accelerated if the resin and
caustic soda are first pulverized before being placed in the kettle; if in
large pieces, a considerable length of time will be required in which to
dissolve them. Ifa sufficient quantity of water is not used at first the
materials when dissolved will form a thick, pasty mass, which simply
breaks open in places to allow the steam to escape, and pieces of the
mixture will be thrown out of the boiler or against its sides or lid by
the escaping steam. When this occurs, water should be added until
the solution boils up in a foamy mass. Whenever there is a tendency
to boil over a small quantity of cold water should be added, but not
too much, or the making of the solution will be retarded; after a few
trials the operator will learn how much water to add in order to pre-
vent the solution from boiling over and yet keep it in a brisk state of
ebullition. If it is not desired to add all of the water at the same time
that the solution is made, then enough can be added to equal two-
fifths of the quantity required; the balance of the water can then be
added at any subsequent time without again heating the solution.
Thus, if a sufficient quantity of the solution is boiled to make when
diluted 100 gallons, this could first be diluted to make only 40 gallons,
and the remaining 60 gallons of water added at any time as required.
If it is desired to use it in a still more concentrated form than this, it
need not be diluted at all after it has been boiled sufficiently, but in
this case it will be necessary to heat it again before adding the water.
On the 11th of February, between the hours of 1:30 and 4:20 p. mn.
(sun shining, light breeze), I had 60 dormant deciduous fruit trees
sprayed with the above solution. These consisted of peach, plum, apple,
pear, and quince trees; none of them had started to leaf out except the
quince, which had put forth a few leaves at the tips of some of its
branches. Each of these trees was infested with the San José scale
(Aspidiotus perniciosus Comstock) and several of them had been almost
killed by the attacks of this pest. April 23 I made a careful examina-
tion of these trees and found only a very few living San José scales;
all of thetrees except those which were nearly dead when sprayed were
now making avigorous growth. May 12 lagain examined these trees,
and found living San José scales on only three of them, about half a
dozen scales on each. I made another examination on the 11th day of
June, and found a few San José scales on some of the pears on the
above trees. All of the Black scales (Lecanium olee Bernard) which
I found on these trees were dead, and their eggs were dry. July 241
again examined these trees and found three or four living San José
scales on a few pears and apples on some of the trees, but the fruit was
practically clean, whereas on adjoiping trees which had not been
sprayed nearly all of the pears were very badly infested with these
scales. There was, however, a singular exception to this: A LeConte
pear tree that stood in the midst of several Bartlett and Winter Nelis
pear trees, which were very badly infested with the San José scale, was,
29
wholly free from this pest. Nor is this an isolated case, since I saw
the same thing in another pear orchard located several miles from this
one. Mr. Richardson informs me, however, that the fruit of this tree
is almost worthless.
Wishing to test the effects of the above wash on growing trees, I
sprayed a prune, peach, apricot, apple, and orange tree on the 12th day
of May, between the hours of 10 and 11 a. m., sun shining, light breeze.
I examined these on the 11th of June; on the prune all of the fruit had
dropped off, and upon one-third of the leaves were dead brown spots,
these spots not exceeding one-sixth of the entire surface of any of the
leaves; on the peach all of the fruit was dead, but still clinging to the
tree, and half the leaves had brown spots in them, these leaves being
much more injured than were those on the prune tree; on the apricot
the fruit was not injured in the least and three-fourths of the leaves
were uninjured, but the remaining leaves had small brown spots in
them, these spots not exceeding one-fifteenth of the surface on any of
the leaves; on the apple all of the fruit had dropped off and half the
leaves had large brown spots in them, these spots sometimes exceeding
one-half of the entire surface of the leaf; on the orange nearly all of
the fruit had dropped off (the young oranges being about half an inch
in diameter), but the leaves were uninjured.
This indicates that of the different kinds of fruit thus experimented
upon the apricot was the hardiest and was the least affected by the
wash ; next to the apricot is the orange, then the prune, after this the
peach, the apple having suffered most from the effect of the wash.
The orange tree experimented upon was infested with the Yellow
scale (Aspidiotus citrinus), and also with the Black scale (Lecanium olew
Bernard), and all of these, as well as the eggs of the Black scale, were
destroyed by the wash.
According to the scale of prices furnished me by the Los Angeles
Soap Company of this city, the material for making 100 gallons of the
above wash, when purchased in large quantities, would amount to $1.14,
being but a trifle over 1 cent a gallon for the diluted wash.
The materials used in preparing the above wash are the same as
those I used in spraying orange trees last season for the destruction of
the Ked scale (Aspidiotus aurantit Maskell), an account of which is
given in my report to Professor Riley for last year, published in Bulle-
tin No. 22 of the Division of Entomology (pp. 10-14); but the spray I
then used was only three-fifths as strong as the one I used for the de-
struction of the San José scale as above described. On the 19th of
December I tested the spray of the same strength that I had used
for the Red scale on orange trees, but it did not prove fatal to all of
the San José scales that it came in contact with.
The question as to the manner 1n which the above resin spray proves
fatal to the scale insects—whether the caustic property imparted by the
caustic soda is the destructive agent, or whether it is the suffocating
30
eftect of the resin and fish oil saponified by the caustic soda that pro-
duces this result—is a very important one. Quite a number of our
fruit growers were at first inclined to believe that it is the caustic prop-
erty of the wash that destroys the scale insect, and they therefore in-
creased the quantity of this particular ingredient, only to find that the
wash so constituted is not apparently more fatal to the insects, while
at the same time it is very liable to injure the fruit. My own studies
and experiments lead me to believe that the above sprays kill for the
most part by suffocation. In the course of experimenting I found that
a wash composed of the following ingredients:
(ORI NO SINETS ES paanise oe oossoc Cans saadoo coucmadan sooo cee see pounds... 8
IRGSI 2 oe siocissc oes oes, eae ase hon neon eae ne cee a= doxs2 08
Water enough to make -.......- Boe oF Oreos gallons.. 100
did not prove fatal to as large a percentage of Red scale as did one con-
sisting of:
CREO) oti bin cedode bon cadeSes Joan casasbbedo Scsbid6on sbO4¢ pounds... 6
INU GSO GEA. Sans Bae SIRE OA DOORN bases Hiden Saaganao besos CaOnSeSss CWSae5 PAY
PIS) Ole poecsoemccas Scbane seen cecedo coon esse doo Ghecoss ase pints... 3
Water enough tocmake!<-s- is. <5 cases cesses ee en ees esse gallons.. 100
Now, if it is the caustic property of the wash that proves fatal to the
scale insects, it is evident that the wash containing the largest amount
of the caustic agent would prove fatal to the largest number of scale
insects, but the reverse of this was really the case; the wash containing
the smallest amountof the caustic agent, the caustic property of which
was still further lessened by the addition of the oil, proved fatal to the
largest number of the insects. On the other hand, the addition of the
oil, while reducing the caustic property of the wash, would increase its
varnishing qualities, since it is a fact well-known to painters that the
addition of oil to a varnish improves its qualities. For these reasons
it seems quite certain that it is the suffocating properties of the wash
and not its caustic nature that cause it to prove fatal to the scale insects
which have been sprayed with it.
I have seen orange trees that had been sprayed with a wash so caustic
that it killed fully nine-tenths of the leaves on the trees, burnt the bark
brown, and caused nearly all the oranges to drop off, and yet quite a
number of the Red scale insects located on the oranges still remaining
on the tree were alive. This will show the utter uselessuess of attempt-
ing to destroy the Red scale on citrus trees by the use of caustic washes.
THE LIME, SALT, AND SULPHUR WASH FOR THE SAN JOSE SCALE.
For destroying the San José scale (Aspidiotus perniciosus Comstock)
on dormant deciduous fruit trees many growers in this State use a wash
composed of the following ingredients in the proportions here given :
Salphunye Ps ssc ote sess =e ceaer as See eee ae eeieee ats pounds.. 33
WGN tcp see ot =o cess ertcee cine eciee AOe Oleae eee ee Seine doz -< 42
Silt.s. sarrieieccns- cols wonece ee ie celee ee ce ee eee Eee sae do22 sree
Water enough to make......--.,--- cece Spo cao nooranecar gallons.. 100
31
All the sulphur and half of the lime are placed in a kettle and 33
gallons of water added, after which the contents of the kettle are boiled
briskly for about 1 hour; the solution will then be of a very dark brown
color and having a reddish tint. All of the salt is added to the remain-
ing 21 pounds of lime and the latter slaked, after which this slaked
lime and salt are added to the above described sulphur and lime solu-
tion and the whole then diluted with a sufficient quantity of water to
make 100 gallons; this is then strained, after which it is ready to be
sprayed upon the trees.
This does not form a perfectly liquid solution but contains a consid-
erable quantity of undissolved sulphur and lime, which soon settles to
the bottom unless the solution is stirred almost constantly while being
sprayed on the trees. It is therefore somewhat of the nature of a thin
whitewash, and the trees sprayed with it have the appearance of hay-
ing been whitewashed. On the 26th of November, at 12:45 p. m., sun
shining, light breeze, I sprayed a pear tree with a wash made according
to the above directions, the tree being very thickly infested with the
San José scale. January 15 I found 14 living San José scales on this
tree, and on the 23d of April I found several more; on the 11th of
June I found on this tree a Black scale (Lecanium olew Bernard) con-
taining healthy eggs.
I also tested this wash in the following proportions ;
Sm Tere elo nts retctn stein oeiniele's orale ats, is) Aeleedajsieriseins Bene sae <= pounds.. 50
ILA Behe Seca pec neO Oberon BOSH OSS Dot SORaonE NO Ee eae HorSpetnas do... -63
Sli ocano os6G00 sso S6eneedan esooDd bOOD0e RobSSdioDeses caso naeE CWscse Bi
Wyiiterzen Gum bh tonm ale ceca oss seisinisioreielao ae iaierte sicialcl ae gallons.. 100
This was applied to a pear tree at 1 p. m., November 26, sun shining,
light breeze. On January 15 I found 6 living San José scales on this
tree, and on the 23d I found several more.
At the time of making these tests there were several green leaves on
each of these trees, but all of these were killed by the washes. The
trees otherwise were not apparently injured, and in the following spring
started into a vigorous growth which was continued throughout the
summer. These trees were not over 10 feet tall, and were very thor-
oughly sprayed, so if seems quite certain that every scale insect located
upon them must have been covered with the wash.
The philosophy of this wash is not at present clearly understood. 1
seems very probable however that the product of the lime and sulphur
(bisulphide of lime, CaS.) furnishes the insecticidal property, and the
presence of the salt and slaked lime simply imparts permanency to the
-wash. I made quite a series ef experiments with the above-named in-
gredients, with a view of ascertaining which of the ingredients were
really insecticides, but these experiments have thus far resulted nega-
tively. The following is a brief account of these experiments :
SAL1?.—Experiment 229: Table salt, 19 pounds; water, 100 gallons.
I simply dissolved the salt in cold water and then sprayed the solution
32
on a pear tree at 12:50 p. m., November 26, sun shining, light breeze.
This did not kill all of the green leaves that were upon the tree. Jan-
uary 15 I found a great many living San José scales on this tree.
Experiment 228: Salt, 38 pounds; water, 100 gallons. Dissolved the
salt in water as before and sprayed on a pear tree at noon, November 26,
sun shining, light breeze. This killed all of the green leaves that were
upon the tree. January 15, I found many living San José scales on this
tree.
Experiment 257: Salt, 60 pounds; water, 100 gallons. Dissolved the
salt as before and sprayed on a pear tree at 10 a. m., January 20, sun
shining, light breeze. April 23, I found a great many living San José
scales on this tree.
SALT AND LiME.—Experiment 238: Salt, 25 pounds; slaked lime,
84 pounds; water, 100 gallons. The salt and lime were added to the
cold water, stirred occasionally, and strained through a piece of Swiss
muslin and then sprayed upon a pear tree at 10:30 a. m., January 30,
sun shining, light breeze. April 23 I found a great many living San
José scales on this tree.
SALT AND SULPHUR.—Experiment 232: Salt, 25 pounds; sulphur,
75 pounds; water, enough to make 100 gallons. The sulphur was boiled
for an hour in 75 gallons of water, after which the salt was added, and
the solution diluted with a sufficient quantity of cold water to make 100
gallons. After standing for a few minutes the greater portion of the
sulphur settled to the bottom, making it necessary to stir the solution
almost constantly while applying it to the tree. Sprayed on a pear tree
at 2:45 p. m., November 26, sun shining, light breeze; this killed all of
the green leaves on the tree. January 15 I found a great many living
San José scales on this tree.
SuLPHUR.—Experiment 233: Sulphur, 100 pounds; water, enough to
make 100 gallons. Placed the sulphur in the water and boiled for 1
hour, then when cold, sprayed the solution on a pear tree at 3 p.m.
November 26, sun shining, light breeze. This did not injure any of the
green leaves that were on the tree. January 15 I found a great many
living San José scales on this tree, a smaller proportion being killed
than in either of the preceding experiments.
LimE.—Experiment 239: Slaked lime, 10 pounds; water, enough
to make 100 gallons. The lime was placed in the water, stirred occa-
sionally and in two hours the solution was strained through a piece of
thin Swiss muslin and sprayed upon a pear tree at 10:45 a. m. January
20, sun shining, light breeze. April 23, I found a great many living
San José scales on this tree.
LIME AND SULPHUR.—Experiment 240: Quicklime (CaO), 100
pounds; sulphur, 334 pounds; water, enough to make 100 gallons.
Placed the lime and sulphur ina copper vessel, added 30 gallons of
water, and boiled for two hours, then filtered. The solution was of a deep
orange-red color. After standing for a few minutes needle-like crystals
Jo
somewhat resembling the down on the seeds of thistles separated out.
These were composed of bisulphide of lime (CaS,) and being freely solu-
ble in water, were dissolved when the balance of the water was added.
In this action all of the sulphur had been incorporated with the lime,
since the residue when dried would not ignite. Added a sufficient
quantity of water to the above solution and sprayed an apple tree with
it at 10:30 a. m. Mareh 18, sun shining, light breeze.
About 14 hours after making the above experiment it began to rain
very gently and this was continued for 24 hours. April 23, I found a
great many living San José scales on this tree. At the time of making
the above test I also sprayed some of the solution on a branch of a
peach tree in full blossom, but this did not appear to produce any in-
jurious effect upon the blossom, since at the time of my visit on the
23d of April this branch bore as many peaches as did any of those L
had not sprayed. It seems almost certain that the rain, coming on so
soon after the wash was applied, rendered neutral the effect of the
above solution on the scale insects sprayed with it. I have seen
orange trees that had been sprayed with the resin wash on a certain
day and a rain occurred during the night following the application ;
but the wash did not prove fatal to nearly as large a percentage of the
red scales as would bave been the case had no rain occurred.
On the same day that the above test was made (March 18), I also
tried the above mentioned lime and sulphur solution at half strength,
but it did not produce any apparent effect upon the San José scales
infesting the tree sprayed with it.. It was now too late in the season
to make additional tests of this solution, but [ hope to be able to fol-
low up this subject during the coming winter.
From the above experiments it would appear that neither lime, salt,
nor sulphur when used separately are effectual in destroying the San
José scale; and the same is true in regard to any two of them when
used in combination, except, perhaps, the lime and sulphur, which have
not as yet been sufficiently tested. It is very probable, however, that
these two ingredients give to the wash its insecticidal property, while
the addition of the slaked lime and salt simply impart stability to the
wash, rendering it less liable to be washed off the trees by the winter
rains. Should this surmise prove correct, then the directions given at
the head of this article for preparing this wash should be changed, an
equal number of pounds of lime being required with the 33 pounds of
sulphur, instead of only 21 pounds of lime, as at present used.
I experienced considerable difficulty in preparing and applying this
wash, owing to the fact that some of the materials used are not solu-
ble in water, necessitating an almost constant stirring of the solution
while it is being sprayed upon the trees. On this account it is quite im-
possible to spray it uniformly upon all of the trees, and this difficulty
has also been experienced by each of our fruit-growers who have used it
and with whom [ have conversed upon the subject, or who have written
25910—Bull. 2 3
34
to me in regard to it. Some of the trees sprayed by this solution
would be very much whitened, as if whitewashed, whereas other trees
sprayed from the same tank as these would be scarcely discolored by
the wash. Itis, of course, the slaked lime added to the solution that
causes it to give the trees the appearance of having been whitewashed,
since neither the salt nor the sulphur discolor the tree to any appreci-
able extent, and the same is true of the bisulphite of lime, which is pro-
duced by boiling the quicklime and sulphur together.
The cost of 100 gallons of this wash according to prices furnished me
by Howell & Craig, wholesale grocers, of this city, for the sulphur and
salt, and by the Southern California Lumber Company, also of this
city, for the lime, is as follows, the materials being purchased in large
quantities :
Sulphur, so pountds;av2+ cents per pounds jas) 1 os sass eee eee $0. 70
Lame, 42 pounds, ati, ofa cent per pound 2... 44-52 s2-- eee eee 533
Salt,2o pounds, ab op) Of a) Cont per pound.)-se eee e-=s eae eee silil
Dotalsssscmsnssuthecccksees se ckuas as tose teccee wes ceemerneeers $1.14
The salt quoted aboveisapoor grade, such as is used for salting hides,
and the price quoted is by the ton; the sulphur is in sacks, and the
lime in barrels containing about 220 pounds each.
Of the two washes above described—the resin, caustic soda, and fish
oil, and the lime, salt, and sulphur washes—the one containing resin is
greatly to be preferred. Not only is this wash easier to prepare than
the other, but it is also much easier to apply it to the trees, since it is
perfectly soluble in water and therefore does not require to be stirred
while being sprayed upon the trees. For this reason more uniform re-
sults will be obtained by its use than would be obtained by using the
sulphur wash. Moreover, the resin wash, by being properly diluted,
can ‘also be used in the summer season, and thus only one wash need be
used at any time of the year. In my own experiments better results
were obtained by the use of the resin wash than were produced by the
sulphur wash. The price per gallon of each of these washes is about
the same. The sulphur wash should never be used on trees in leaf nor
on those just starting to leaf out, and this is also true of the resin wash
when made according to the formula given in the preceding article.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPERIMENTS.
CORROSIVE SUBLIMATE (also known as mercuric chloride, HgCl2).—
Some time ago one of the Horticultural Commissioners of San Ber-
nardino County remarked to me that he had used a simple solution of
corrosive sublimate for the purpose of destroying various kinds of scale
insects on nursery trees, and had obtained very good results by the
use of the same; and it was also reported in some of the San Diego
papers that a gentleman living in that county had obtained better re-
sults by the use of a solution of the above kind than he had by using
any other kind of insecticide for the destruction of the black scale.
35
Thinking the subject worthy of investigation, I made a few experi-
ments with this substance, but the results were far from being satis-
factory. I dissolved the sublimate in cold water by frequent stirring ;
this required about 15 minutes, and the solution was of a dark bluish-
gray color. Following is a brief account of these experiments:
(224) Corrosive sublimate, 24 ounces; water 100 gallons. Sprayed
on an orange tree infested with the red scale at 3 p. m., October 10, sun
shining, light breeze. November 13, leaves and fruit uninjured; found
great many living red scales on this tree.
(223) Corrosive sublimate, 44 ounces; water, 100 gallons. Sprayed
on an orange tree at 2:30 p. m., October 10, sun shining, light breeze.
November 13, leaves and fruit aeqareon found great many living red
scales on this tree.
(236) Corrosive sublimate, 1; pounds; water, 100 gallons. Sprayed
on a dormant pear tree infested with the San José scale at 10 a. m.,
December 31, sun shining, light breeze. February 3, found a great
many living San José scales on this tree.
The price in this city of the corrosive sublimate in 10-pound lots is
at the rate of $1.40 per pound; at this rate the strongest solution I
used (experiment 236) would cost about $1.63 per 100 gallons. I did
not test a stronger solution than this, since its cost alone would prevent
its being extensively used.
GLUE.—For the purpose of testing this substance as an insecticide
for the destruction of the red scale on citrus trees I made a few experi-
ments with it, but with very unsatisfactory results. The grade I used
is of a light brown color, not the white, nor yet the poorest grade, but
such as is used by cabinet-makers. To dissolve the glue I simply boiled
it in water, and it dissolved in about 10 minutes. Following is a brief
account of these experiments:
(227) Glue, 44 pounds; water 100 gallons. Sprayed on an orange
tree infested with the red scale at 4:30 p. m., October 11, sun shining,
light breeze. November 13, leaves and fruit uninjured; found great
many living red scales on this tree.
(226) Glue, 8.1 pounds; water 100 gallons. Sprayed on an orange
tree at 4p. m., October 11, sun shining, light breeze. November 13,
leaves and fruit uninjured; found great many living red scales on this
tree.
(225) Glue 124 pounds; water 100 gallons. Sprayed on an orange
tree at 3:30 p. m., October 11, sun shining, light breeze. November 13,
leaves and fruit uninjured; found great many living red scales on this
tree.
In this city (Los Angeles) the price of glue of the above grade in 10-
pound lots is at the rate of 50 cents perpound; at this rate the strongest
solution I used (experiment 225) will cost $6.25 per 100 gallons. This,
of course, is much too expensive for ordinary use as an insecticide, and
for this reason I did not test a stronger solution.
36
ALOES.—Dr. M. F. Bishop, of Alameda, the owner of a large orchard
of deciduous fruit trees in the vicinity of San José, in the northern
part of the State, gave me a package of aloes, with the request to test
it on the scale insects infesting citrus trees. Accordingly I made a
few tests with it, simply dissolving the aloes in cold water, straining
thé solution through a piece of Swiss muslin, and then spraying it
upon the tree. The aloes is not readily soluble in cold water, and 4
days were required for it to dissolve, being occasionally stirred during
this time. The experiments are as follows:
(243) Aloes, 124 pounds; water, 100 gallons. Sprayed en an orange
tree infested with the yellow scale (Aspidiotus citrinus) at 10:30 a. mn.,
March 22, sun shining, light breeze. April 23, leaves and fruit unin-
jured; found many living yellow scales on this tree.
(242) Aloes, 25 pounds; water, 100 gallons. Sprayed on an orange
tree at 10 a. m., March 22, sun shining, light breeze. April 23, leaves
and fruit uninjured; found several living yellow scales both on the
leaves and {fruit of this tree.
The price of the aloes in large quantities is at the rate of 16 cents
per pound; at this rate the strongest solution I used (experiment 242)
would cost $4 per 100 gallons. At this strength (25 pounds of aloes to
100 gallons water) it proved fatal to a large percentage of the scale
insects, and doubtless if it had been used one-half stronger it would
have been entirely effectual; but the high price of a solution of the
latter strength would prevent its being used on a large scale.
REPORT OF EXPERIMENTS WITH RESIN COMPOUNDS ON
PHYLLOXERA, AND GENERAL NOTES ON CALIFORNIA
INSECTS.
By ALBERT KOEBELE.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
ALAMEDA, CAL., October 20, 1890.
Sir: T herewith submit report upon experiments, chiefly with resin compounds, on
Phy 'loxera vastatrir, and observations made during the year.
Very respectfully,
ALBERT KOEBELF,
Field Agent.
Prof. C. V. RILEy,
U. S. Entomologist.
By your direction a series of experiments was carried on, chiefly with
resin compounds, upon the Phylloxera in Sonoma Valley during Septem-
ber and the beginning of October.
In preparing the compounds the following were used: Bicarbonate
of soda, sal soda, and Greenbank’s caustic soda, 98 per cent. Three
pounds are required of the former to dissolve 4 pounds of resin prop-
erly, or, in other words, to make a resin soap; 1 pound of the latter is
sufficient to dissolve 10 pounds of resin or even 11, but I did not sue-
ceed in dissolving 12 pounds, as parts of the resin would always re-
main. In repeated and careful trials this could not be overcome.
The results showed somewhat in favor of the bicarbonate of soda as
far as to destruction of the insects, but the price has to be considered.
Next to this seems to be the emulsion prepared with caustic soda, but
it is a difficult matter to decide which will work best without carrying
on an extensive series of trials. Itis safe to say, however, that the
results will not vary greatly.
One pound of resin was used to each 10 pints of compound, and
this again was diluted with water at a strength of 1 pound of resin in
24 gallons of water, up to 1 pound in 37$ gallons of water—one part of
compound in thirty parts of water. This compound will, as has been
previously stated, do effective work on unprotected Aphids, 7. e., such
as are not covered with cottony or mealy exudations, at one part in
37
38
fifteen parts of water, or 1.pound of resin in about 16 gallons of water.
(The former mixtures were somewhat stronger; 1 pound of resin in
9 pints of liquid.) The action upon the Phylloxera is much more
marked and with a mixture of one part of compound in thirty parts of
water the insects, if immersed for a few seconds only and left exposed,
will die, notwithstanding this solution will not adhere to parts of the
roots, not having at this strength the required penetrating power which
a sufficiently strong solution, say about 1 pound resin in 15 gallons of
water, has, and more so than any other insecticide I know of. The
experiments were made on 25-year-old Tokay vines (the only ones re-—
maining that have withstood the ravages of the Phylloxera), in loamy
soil, which was completely dry and hard at this time of the year, no
moisture being noticeable until a depth of from 10 to 12 inches below
the surface was reached. '
In all cases the ground was removed te a depth of about 6 inches,
forming a hole 4 feet in diameter. Ten gallons of the solution, it was
observed, penetrated here to 12 inches in depth around the roots where
the hole was deepest, or about 18 inches from original surface of ground,
and most of the insects were destroyed to about 16 inches in depth, if
the 10 gallons contained 4 pints of compound. In the later experiments
these holes were made only about 2 feet in diameter, and nearly if not
the same results were obtained with only half the amount or 5 gallons
of the mixture. This is more practical, as the chief roots only are
reached and the solution can be used so much stronger. The less
solution required the better, providing it will do the work, for at 10 gal-
lons to each plant this would mean 7,000 gallons or over per acre. If
the solution is applied at another time of the year, say early spring,
when rain is still expected, the results undoubtedly will be still more
favorable. I have had excellent results with solutions prepared with
caustic soda by using 4 pints of this to 16 pints of water only and ap-
plying 5 gallons of water soon after and 5 gallons the following day.
This destroyed the Phylloxera to nearly the depth the fluid reached.
Thus it wili be seen if a small amount of the mixture, sufficiently strong,
be applied in early spring the following rains will do the rest. As it
was, with the dry soil, the 4 pints of compound in 10 gallons of diluent
did better work than the same amount of compound in only 5 gallons,
‘for the simple reason that it penetrated farther and thus reached more
of the insects in sufficient strength to kill. It must also be remembered
that a completely dry soil will take up a large amount of the 1.quid,
whereas in a moist soil this is not the case.
The compounds were prepared as formerly, sal soda 3 pounds, resin 4
pounds, dissolved together with 1 quart of water, and water added
slowly while boiling to make 40 pints. The caustic soda, which comes
in 10-pound tin cans, is dissolved in 4 gallons of water, after which 4
gallons more should be added. This lye will dissolve 100 pounds of
resin and make 125 gallons of compound, sufficient for 250 plants, and
39
costing at wholesale in San Francisco (T. W. Jackson & Co., No. 104
Market street) $2.50. This is sufficiently strong, and to use more is
unnecessary, as it was found that even 3 pints of the emulsion to the
plant would do the work.
1 will give herea receipt for preparing the cheapest compound. This
is with common caustic soda, such as is sold at wholesale at about 5
cents per pound:
Caustic soda, 77 per cent......-.---. Bence eoacesccae costes pounds.. 5
ISGSHIG, DSS ace iee SOS OOO e CRE epee PSs SATS SSs SES Ae aaa There do... 40
Wake nibOnmn ace Seacrs natant sae stotsirepe tee tee ait ite me gallons.. 50
First the soda should be dissolved over fire with 4 gallons of water,
then the resin added and dissolved properly, after which the required
water can be given slowly while boiling to make the 50 gallons of com-
pound. This will make 500 gallons of the diluent, sufficient for 100
plants, and costing about $4 cents.
While a much weaker solution would kill the Phylloxera, this is
recommended, as it also destroys their eggs effectively. Below are
given the results of some of the experiments to show the effects of
various strengths. Most of these have been duplicated or tried upon
several plants. A small mite (Tyroglyphus sp.), always very abundant
among the Phylloxera, and, as a rule, feeding upon the sap of the
roots, yet from numerous empty skins appearing to feed also upon the
lice, was in no case injured by these resin washes.
CoMPOUND No. 1.—Bicarbonate of soda, 3 pounds ; resin, 4 pounds, and
water to make 40 pints, costing 15 cents.
Compound, 1 gallon; water, 6 gallons; in holes 4 feet in diameter.
Destroyed insects to about 12 inches in depth from original surface, as
well as the eggs of the same, which became dark in color.
Compound, one-half gallon; water, 4 gallons. Destroyed all insects
where they were reached (occasionally a living one running about).
Compound, 1 part; water, 10 parts; about 10 gallons of the fluid
used. This will destroy all lice and their eggs completely to 12 inches
from original surface, but not deeper.
Compound, 1 part; water, 12 parts; 9? gallons used. Twenty-four
hours after application some of the solution remained still on top, and
on examining 6 days later it was found that it had penetrated the ground
to 12 inches from original surface. Much of the solution had evap.
orated and left a brown scum (dry soap) on top. It will also destroy
most, if not all, of the eggs.
Compound, 1 part; water, 14 parts. Three and three-fourths gallons
of the diluent in holes 2 feet in diameter killed the insects to 8 inches
in depth, or 14 inches from original surface.
Compound, 1 part; water, 16 parts; 83 gallons diluent. Occasion-
ally a living insect found and large numbers of mites on the nearly
dead vines.
40
Compound, 1 part; water, 18 parts ; 93 gallons diluent; examined 5
days after. Nearly alltheinsects dead to 14 inches in depth, but most of
the eggs looked bright yellow and no doubt will hatch. Behind the
thick bark near the top, where apparently the solution did not penetrate,
a number of young lice were found alive.
Compound, 1 part; water, 20 parts; 104 gallons diluent; in holes
4 feet in diameter. An examination 5 days later showed the fluid
had penetrated the ground on plants 154 or 20 inches from original
surface. All the insects were destroyed 13 inches in depth and but
very few living 3inchesdeeper. This solution seems to work best of all
this series, but it is doubtful if the eggs will be affected by it.
ComMPounD No. 2.—Caustic soda, 98 per cent., 1 pound ; resin, 10 pounds ;
water to make 124 gallons ; compound costing 25 cents.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 4 pints; in hole 4 feet in diameter; 5
gallons of water added 1 hour later and the same quantity next day.
Very few dead insects were found upon this plant, and none living.
Not sufficient to show proper result.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 2 gallons; 5 gallons of water added 1 hour
after and 5 gallons the following day. Examined plants 7 days later.
result very satisfactory, hardly any living phylloxera as far as the fluid
reached. After examination 5 gallons more water were added and
again examined a week later, when no living insects could be found to
a depth of 18 inches.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 10 gallons. Destroyed insects to about 8
inches in depth and but few below this.
Holes only 2 feet in diameter; 5 gallons of water in same first, and
solution 1 hour later in the four succeeding experiments.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 45 gallons; examined 15 days later. De-
stroyed insects and eggs as well, which had become very dark. Occa- *
sionally a live specimen running about.
Compound, 3 pints; water, 44 gallons. Examined 13 days later and
found all insects dead that had been reached.
Compound, 24 pints; water, 373 pints. Hxamined13 days later. A .
piece of root about 10 inches deep one-halfinch in diameter by 6 inches
long and completely covered with phylloxera showed but one single
living young, probably hatched from egg after application.
Compound, 2 pints; water, 435 gallons; also examined at the end of
13 days. All insects to 8 inches below ground or 14 inches below orig-
inal surface were destroyed, as well as a large part of the eggs. Oc-
casionally a living young was found wandering about.
Four other experiments were made with this compound, using 1, 2, 3,
and 4 pints in 20 of the solution, the ground having 4 hours previously
been saturated with 5 gallons of water in each case. Examined 12 days
after; results were not good with 1 pint but were progressively better
with the other three. Applied 4 gallons more water on plants where 3
Al
and 4 pints had been used, and found 2 days later that this additional
water still increased the effect.
In addition to this a number of plants were treated with this compound
to note the results next spring. The holes were made 2 feet in diameter,
and after the solution had disappeared the wet ground from the outside
was placed around the plant and the hole closed again. The experi-
ments were: Five pints of compound in 5 gallons of the solution, four
plants; 4 pints of compound in 5 gallons of the solution, eight plants ;
3 pints of compound in 5 gallons of the solution, ten plants; and 2 pints
of compound in 5 gallons of the solution, ten plants.
CompounD No. 3.—Caustie soda, 98 per cent, 1 pound ; resin, 8 pounds ;
and water to make 10 gallons of compound, costing 22 cents.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 74 gallons. Examined 6 days later; result
good.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 10 gallons. Examined 6 days later and
found result favorable.
Compound, 3 pints; water, 75 pints. Found only part of insects de-
stroyed 6 days later.
Compound, 3 pints; water, 90 pints. There were not enough insects
upon this plant to deduce fair results, which would no doubt be very
poor.
Compound No. 4.—Sal soda, 3 pounds; resin, 4 pounds ; and water to
make 5 gallons of compound ; costing 11 cents.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 74 gallons. Examined 5 days later and
found all insects killed except a few living on a plant under thick bark,
where solution apparently did not penetrate.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 10 gallons. Examined 5 days later and
found insects dead to 12 inches in depth from original surface, with only
occasionally a live one walking about.
Compound, 3 pints; water, 75 pints. On examining, 5 days later,
only the insects near surface were found dead.
Compound, 4 pints; water, 15 gallons. This destroyed only partly
the lice near the top.
The following four experiments were made with this compound, the
ground having been previously soaked with 4 gallons of water :
Compound, 3 pints; water, 21 pints. Examined 12 days later. Did
not show good results, as part of the insects were found alive. Twice
the amount of water with the same quantity of compound will do much
better work.
Compound, 3 pints; water, 33 pints. Examined 12 days later and
found results fairly good. Only a few living ones were running about.
Compound, 2 pints; water, 30 pints. On examination numerous live
insects were found, but more than half were killed.
42
Compound, 2 pints; water 38 pints. Result about the same as in
preceding experiment.
These four experiments were repeated and the water added (3 gal-
lons) 2 hours after instead of before application of emulsion. The re-
sults in this case were much more satisfactory, destroying most of the
eggs in the two first experiments and nearly all of the phylloxera in the
two last to a depth of about 10 inches.
GENERAL NOTES.
It was probably owing to the unusually heavy rainfall during last
winter that insects were comparatively scarce in the early part of the
season. At least no complaint was noticed or heard during this time.
While a large number would undoubtedly be destroyed by weeks of
excessive rains and floods, yet there are such as are not or only slightly
affected by this element. I may cite here, for instance, such species the
eggs of which are found upon trees and shrubs during the winter months
as well as the eggs of locusts usually deposited on dry hillsides. Ona
visit to Sonoma county during May, the larve of Clistocampa were ex-
tremely abundant. Two species were found, namely, C. constricta and
C. thoracica. The first species predominated in numbers, and while
usually feeding upon deciduous oaks was also found upon Live Oak and
Quercus agrifolia as wellas various shrubs. In confinement these larvie
were furnished with food consisting of leaves of Plum and Cherry, but
for three days they would not feed upon these and readily attacked the
leaves of Live Oak which were given them, and upon these they were
raised. CO. thoracica, which is the species defoliating various fruit trees,
was found chiefly upon willows, but also upon oaks, and here again
usually upon White Oak, upon which its eggs were found in October.
This species was bred upon leaves of Prune and Cherry.
At the end of May of the present year, I received from Mr. F. L.
Washburn, entomologist of the experiment station at Corvallis, Ore-
gon, a few Clisiocampa larve new to me. He said they were found
feeding upon a species of Crataegus and were sent with leaves of apple,
upon which I reared them. On my visit to Washington these larvz
were met with at Tacoma, on June 8, within webs upon Alder (Alnus
rubra), and again at Easton, during July, upon Willow. Near Tacoma
IT also found what I took to be the larvee of C. thoracica very abundant
upon Crategus, Alder, Hazel, and various other shrubs. Two of the
larvie were taken to Easton, and one pupated and to my surprise pro-
duced not the expected C. thoracica, but C. erosa Stretch.
About 10 miles along the railroad in southern Oregon, about the be-
ginning of June, larve and webs of one of these moths were seen in
large quantities on dry hillsides upon Purshia tridentata DC., Ceanothus
sp.,and also Wild Cherry. While crossing the Columbia River on
steamer, June 8, at which time the water was very high, large numbers
of these larve were observed floating upon the swift current and as
43
many as a dozen could be seen at one time, but of all the hundreds seen
very few were dead. They were usually in a half circle and completely
dry above and were carried off to be distributed safely along the shores.
In both cases I had no opportunity to obtain specimens for identifica-
tion.
As to the parasites, so far two species of a small Chalcid were bred
from 37 egg masses of C. constricta found within three hours while col-
lecting Cynipid galls in Sonoma County during October. This species
is preyed upon by Tachina flies, which are or have been, the present
season, the chief agent in destroying them. From about two hundred
grown larve collected but very few moths were obtained, the Tachina
maggots issuing from the dying and spun-up larve in large numbers.
No ground for their reception had been furnished in breeding cases and
they pupated among the leaves and excrement. Atleast 80 per cent
of these larvze were parasitized and but one of the flies has issued up
to date. I also obtained one large cocoon of an Ichneumonid from
larve in confinement and others were still found in nature during Sep-
tember.
C. thoracica was also infested by Tachina larve, but only about
30 per cent. were destroyed by these maggots. Two species of the flies
have come out so far. C. californica was noticed full of eggs of these
flies and some had previously been bred. An Ichneumonid was ob-
tained from young larve the present year. Professor Rivers, of
Berkeley, informed me the end of April that he had previously ob-
served one of these larvie at Bay View upon Willow, and accordingly
a trip was made to that locality and this species was found as well as
its tents, not alone upon Willow, but also on the scrubby Live Oaks
growing there, Hazel, Wild Currant, Rhamnus californica, Blackberry,
and other plants, showing that this species is not confined to Live Oak
alone.
No Tachina has yet been obtained from the species in Santa Cruz
Mountains, nor have I observed any eggs, but larvee of this species
placed upon Cherry and Prune at Alameda were badly attacked. The
same species of Ichneumonid bred from larvee of C. californica has also
been obtained from this. This species was observed upon Plum, Prune,
Willow, Ceanothus and Cercocarpus.
Two species of Ichneumonids were bred from the new species of the
north, one from larve found at Tacoma, and the second from those
found at Easton.
I may mention one Noctuid larva as very destructive to buds, young
fruit, and foliage of fruit trees, chiefly Apple, Pear, Plum, and Prune.
This is Taniocampa, and I have full proof that the destruction of a
large share of the buds and young fruit, so universally, yet incorrectly,
attributed to birds on this coast, is due to this larvee. In the very
early spring, often in February, these moths make their appearance
from hibernated chrysalids and copulate, and the female deposits her
44
eggs, from two to three hundred or more, in crevices of bark. I found
them in large numbers together, thrust deep into a place where one of
he branches had broken off. The young larvee soon made their ap-
pearance and in want of leaves began to feed upon buds and blossoms,
and later on, as I have repeatedly observed on apple trees, upon the
young fruit also. Within about 24 days these larve become full grown
and enter the ground for pupation to remain in this state for nearly 11
months. If only one or two early broods occur upon a single or-
dinary tree, they will, in some cases, destroy most if not all the fruit
buds before any leaves appear. The light green, white, variegated, and
striped larvee at rest on the under side of leaves during the daytime
are not, especially by an untrained eye, very readily discovered, and
hence are overlooked and the more innocent bird is made responsible
for the damage done.
During April, 1888, when I had a peead of these larvee in confine.
ment at Alameda, a common titmouse, Lophophanes inornatus Gamb.,
was noticed flying constantly to an old apple tree and carrying off
dozens of these very larve to a hollow tree not far. distant, within
which it had a nest with six young. These birds are quite plentiful
at this time of the year and are the only enemy of this larva as yet
observed. None of the numerous larve collected the present year
appear to be parasitized.
By jarring the trees in the early morning these larvee, especially the
larger, will fallto the ground, and can readily be collected and destroyed.
If the tree be only slightly shaken, all the mature larvie will drop.
Caloptenus devastator, so well remembered since its outbreak in 1885,
has again been on the increase the present season and is quite abun-
dant in Sonoma County as well as around Alameda, where Camnula pel-
lucida was equally as numerous. Aside from complaints in Sonoma
County others were heard of in Yolo County. I quote from the Wood-
land Democrat of September 11, 1590:
For the past few weeks our farmers have been watching their alfalfa crops very
closely. The Army Worm and the Grasshopper are both here, although not in such
quantities as in the early days. In some eases the crops in young vineyards have
been entirely destroyed by them. C. Eakle lost all his grapes by the grasshoppers
and others have shared a like fate. In other cases the alfalfa crops have fared badly
from the effects of the worm and the hopper. Mrs. P. Hannum had saved some alfalfa
for seed, but the worm attacked it, and she was obliged to cut it for hay in order to
save any of it. Mr. Hopkins, we understand, was caught in the same predicament,
while the pastures of those who have lately irrigated and where the clover is just
beginning to grow nice and green are full of the hoppers, and the worms have also
attacked many others.
As yet no specimens from the above locality can be obtained, but it
is more than likely that the injury was caused by several species and
the Devastating Locust among them. One favorable season, however,
should no parasites appear, would again show a marked increase in
destructive numbers, and local outbreaks may be expected the coming
summer,
ENTOMOLOGICAL NOTES FOR THE SEASON OF 1890.
By Mary E. Murtrecpr.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL,
Kirk woop, St. Louts County, Mo.,
- October 31, 1890.
Sir: Inelosed please find summary of my notes on injurious insects for the present
year, as observed throughout the season in St. Louis County, and as compiled from cor-
respondence with and occasional visits to other sections of the State. As in preced-
ing years, many thanks are due you fur yarious determinations and helpful sugges-
tious,
Respectfully, yours,
Mary E. Mvunrrevpr.
Prot Cr Vin KILEY,
U. S. Entomologist.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS.
The season of 1890 throughout the Mississippi Valley has been in
many respects unusual. The winter months were characterized by a
temperature much above the normal, by occasional very heavy rains,
and, after the middle of January, by a prevalence of clouds and exces-
sive moisture. Many shrubs, for example Forsythia, Cydonia, and
Lilac bloomed in the open air about the holidays, while the buds of all
fruit trees were much swollen, and peaches and apricots opened their
blossoms in sheltered situations in February. During early March the
mercury for the first time in the year dropped to the neighborhood of
zero, and on the last day of the month occurred a phenomenal fail of
snow. April also was cold and damp, and similar weather prevailed
until the middle of May, the soil, except where drainage was excep-
tionally good, being in poor condition for planting. With the first of
June excessive heat set in, and for seven consecutive weeks the mercury
was seldom below 90° I’. at midday, and usually approached or ex-
ceeded 100°. This extreme heat was accompanied by an equally severe
drought for the same length of time, scarcely mitigated by two or three
very slight and very local showers.
45
7
46
That the effects of such a season should be plainly marked on insect
life is not surprising. The following memoranda show considerable
deviation from the records of preceding years.
Chinch Bugs were not reported as injurious in any part of the State,
and scarcely a specimen could be found during midsummer and early
autumn.
Canker Worms.—Very few, and found mostly in orchards or on trees
standing somewhat above the general level. The male moths were fly-
ing every month duzing winter, and an occasional female was also seen
in January and February. Probably the severe cold of March destroyed
a large proportion of the very young larvae, more perhaps by retarding
the development of the apple leaves than by the direct effects of the
cold.
Of the few worms that were found later in the season taking their
noonday siesta on the trunks and larger branches of the trees, quite a
number were seen which had evidently been attacked by some Carabid
or other predaceous species, the skin having been punctured and the
fluids oozing out with every motion. All injured worms perished, but
what the assailant was I was not able to discover.
Cutworms (Agrotis and Hadena).—Vegetable gardens in the spring
enjoyed an immunity from these pests that was most welcome to the
gardener. This was probably due to the fact that some of the most.
destructive species hibernate in the larva state, and the degree of cold
not being sufficient to reduce them to complete dormancy they perished
of starvation and dampness or fell victims to the birds, which remained
with us in greater numbers than is usually the case. My memoranda
show that very few Noctuid moths of any kind were taken at light
previous to the middle of August. To this scarcity of Noctuid pests
there were, however, two notable exceptions—that of Gortyna nitela and
Heliothis armigera, which have seldom committed so great injuries to
certain crops as during the present year. About the middle of June
many samples of young corn and potato stalks were sent me that were
being bored by the first-named larva, and it was then reported from
some localities—among others from Kidder, Missouri—as having de-
stroyed fully one-half the crop of potatoes. Its injuries to young corn -
were also extensive, but I have no data for making an estimate. It was
also found in considerable numbers, when very small, in small grain.
In this it could scarcely reach maturity, and probably migrated to the
stalks of such more succulent plants as were conveniently near. In the
case of the attack on potatoes a treatment with Paris green and flour
was recommended, on the probability that in passing from one stalk to
another the-worm would obtain a sufficient quantity of the poison to
destroy it. Of the success of this experiment, if tried, I have not been
informed. It did not occur in any noticeable numbers in the vicinity
of Kirkwood.
Heliothis armigera was very destructive on both early and late corn,
47
especially on the latter. In the southern part of the State it injured
the tomato crop to a considerable extent. Spraying with Paris green
and with other arsenical compounds was tried with considerable success
previous to the ripening of the fruit, but there is considerable danger
in its use and it is best to thoroughly drench the plants that have been
treated with clear water a day or two after the use of the insecticide.
Experiment on a limited scale shows that it can be kept from corn by
the same remedies, but how far this would be practicable in the field
_has not yet been demonstrated.
The Striped Flea-beetles (Phyllotreta vittata and P. sinuata) did not ap-
pear at all on early Crucifers, nor have they been observed in any con-
iderable numbers in this vicinity at any time during the growing sea- |
son. Whether this notable riddance was due to atmospheric conditions
or to the scarcity of the fostering weeds, Lepidium and Arabis, I am not
able to decide.
The Corn Flea-beetle (Chetocnema pulicaria) was reported to me from
various localities as unusually numerous and injurious. Mr. Falcon, of
St. Clair County, feared that he should lose his first planting from its
attacks, but from later accounts the plants recovered more rapidly
than he had expected.
The Plum Curculio was much reduced in numbers during winter, and
as there was in this section, and indeed throughout the State, an almost
entire failure of stone fruit crops, with the exception of the sour cher-
ries, which the insect rarely attacks, there was very little of the work
of the latter observed. A small proportion of the few early peaches
that set were punctured, but that the midsummer drought prevented
the development of the larvie was indicated by the fact that such late
peaches as there were did not show a single one of the food punctures
which commonly so disfigure them. On one tree which the previous
year had suftered so much in this way that the fruit was absolutely
worthless, was a single peach that reached perfection without one
stroke from the beak of a curculio; and similar observations were
made on other trees on which a very little fruit ripened. Nor was I
able to find Conotrachelus breeding in apples, although during June
and July I examined nearly six hundred specimens of fruit, a few of
which showed punctures that might have been made for food. Should
other conditions be favorable, I think, so far as this insect is concerned,
we may predict for 1891 fine crops of stone fruits.
Plant lice, always quite abundant in the spring, amounted this year
almost to a scourge. Trees, shrubs, and herbs alike suffered, and for
many plants there was no after-recovery. The species causing the most
appreciable loss was probably the Grain Aphis (Siphonophora avene). It
occurred throughcut the State on all small grain, even on rye, causing,
undoubtedly, some shrinkage of that crop as well as of wheat, but its
most disastrous attacks were on oats. About the middle of May farm-
ers began to be alarmed for the safety of this crop, and subsequent
48
developments proved their fears to be well grounded. Letters of
inquiry and packages of specimens came to me from all directions, and
during a trip about the first of June, to Butler County, on the southern
boundary of the State, I was able to observe for myself the dwarfed
and sickly appearance of small grain everywhere along the railroad,
attributable in all cases to the attacks of this insect. Shortly after-
ward the outfields in St. Louis County and in many other localities
were plowed up and replanted to corn, which, owing to the drought and
to its own insect enemies, was, in its turn, a poor crop. The unusual
prevalenceand unparalleled multiplication of Aphidide was undoubtedly
due to to the scarcity of their natural enemies, both parasitic and pre.
daceous. It was not until the middle of June that the larvie of Syrphi.
de, Coccinellide, and Chrysopa became numerous, and, reénforced by
parasites of the genera Aphidius and Trioxys, finally brought relief from
the pests; too late, however, to prevent irreparable injury to many
herbaceous crops, young fruit trees, and various sorts of shrubbery.
A somewhat remarkable development of the season was the appear-
ance in unusual numbers of many insects not often accounted noxious,
and the reappearance of some species not observed in this locality for
many years. : :
Among the former may be mentioned the great abundance and variety
of “ stinging” larvie, principally Limacodes. For the first time in my
experience the beautiful larvee of Parasa chloris were so abundant on
some young apricot trees in the orchard of one of our neighbors as to
do great damage to the foliage. When full grown, three-fourths or
more of an inch in length, thick, oblong, sub-eylindrical, gaily striped
longitudinally in carmine red, purple, and bright yellow, the stinging
spines concealed in the two rows of deflected bright yellow plumes that
adorn the back, gliding with slow, graceful motion over the leaves, they
were almost too ornamental to doom to destruction. As they were
very voracious, however, the latter was a necessity of the case. Those
that were preserved were fed to maturity on the leaves of Chickasaw
plum, to which they were transferred without difficulty.
Huclea querceti H.8., of the same form and size as P. chloris, but much
less brilliantly colored, being of a dull, mottled green, with two or four
dark purple-red spots on each side of the dorsum, and having the plu-
mose spines pale green, appeared on Plum, Cherry, and Apple in the
orchard, as well as on Sycamore, Post Oak, and Wild Cherry in the
forest. It was not, however, in any destructive numbers on any fruit
tree. <
So far as coloration is concerned this larva varies greatly. The crim-
son sub-dorsal spots, usually quite large when there are but two, are
in some examples smaller and less conspicuous and are followed pos-
teriorly by a second pair. The longitudinal ridges on which these are
situated, and from which also proceed the larger urticating spines,
vary in hue from pale pea green to yellow and bright orange. A second
49
variety was so distinet as to be described, previous to breeding, as
another species. This is entirely of a pearly, translucent white color,
with fine, wavy, purple lines, one on each side cof medio-dorsal space
and two others lower down on each side inclosing the second row of
spines, which, like the general surface, are translucent white. There is
a large purple spot a little back of the middle on each side of the dor-
sum. I have found this variety only on pear, and it is rather rare.
The cocoon is spun among the leaves and does not differ in color, form,
or texture from those of other Limacodes. The moth bred from this
pale larva does not differ from those of typical querceti, being of a rich
fustic brown, with bright green and velvety black ornamentation. In
the size of the green and black spots and in general intensity of color
a series of moths of this species also exhibit considerable variation.
The almost equally beautiful and even more strikingly marked Saddle-
back Caterpillar (Hmpretia stimulea) occurred in very unusual numbers
on Plum, Pear, Chestnut, Maple, and Wisteria vine, doing considerable
damage—especially during the semi-gregarious period, which continues
to the third molt—to the foliage of the fruit trees attacked.
Phobetron pithecitum and Limacodes scapha were other species of this
group observed.
Lagoa crispata was quite numerous on White Oak and Chestnut, and
colonies of Saturnia io appeared on Corn and Sassafras and defoliated
several rose bushes in our garden before we discovered the authors of
the mischief. Altogether there was quite an array of * urticators,”
and gloves were very necessary to preserve the hands of the collector
in taking them and also in caring for them in the rearing cage. They
seem to dispense stinging points all over the foliage over which they
crawl and all about the cage in which they are confined. I have often
had my hands smart for hours after changing the leaves and cleaning
the cage in which these larvee had been reared, long after they were
inclosed in their cocoons.
There was throughout this and contiguous States a notable outbreak
of Datana both D. angusti and D. ministra, but especially the former.
This species appeared on the Walnut in June, and the second brood
again in August, and from the excessive and repeated defoliations it is
probable that many fine trees have been destroyed.
During a journey taken about the 1st of September, numbers of
trees were noticed bearing what would have been a heavy crop of nuts,
but absolutely leafless, while the trunks were almost covered with larval
exuvie. The nuts were, of course, small and imperfect, the shrunken
husks clinging to the seed. Several collections of the walnut-feeding
larvee were sent me, but not having a supply of walnut leaves conven-
ient, I was not able to rear any of them, as they refused to accept asa
substitute the leaves of hickory or of Rhus glabra or copalina, although
some years ago I bred them from the latter.
During September the black-necked larve of what I suppose will
25910—Bull, 23——4
50
prove to be D. ministra, Drury, appeared on post oaks in Kirkwood
and vicinity, defoliating portions of the trees infested. From their gre-
garious habit and their susceptibility to poison they were easily routed.
Even a stream of water turned upon them from the spraying pump
would dislodge and bring them to the ground, where they were easily
killed.
Orgyia leucostigma, a species formerly abundant in this locality, but
which I had not observed for ten or twelve years, was found on Sycamore
(Platanus), on which, strange to say, it would. not feed after the second
molt, and consequently all caterpillars left on the tree perished before
attaining half their growth. The question suggested by this observa-
tion was how the young larve came to be upon this tree which so evi-
dently did not suit them for food. I could not find either cocoon or egg
mass of the mother insect, nor were any of the larve discovered in
the adjacent orchard.
Ichthyura inclusa, another species not observed here for many years,
appeared on willows in great numbers in September, but coming so late
in the season the defoliations did no serious damage.
In coneluding these notes I wish to mention an insect that will prob-
ably prove most efficient in ridding the country of the pest of the Web
Worm (Hyphantria cunea). This is the larva of a smail and inconspicu-
ous Carabid of the genus Plochionus, bearing the appropriate specific
name timidus. I had observed during the month of June that the
greater number of the webs of the caterpillar were unusually small and
incomplete and seemed to have been deserted much sooner than usual.
Before I had time to investigate the matter, I received from Mr. J. C.
Duffey, horticulturist at the Shaw Botanical Garden, a colony of the
worms, interspersed among which were numerous small active Carabid
larvee, which Mr. Duffey informed me were preying upon the former.
The collection was placed in a cage and arranged for convenient obser-
vation, and I very shortly had ocular demonstration of the correctness
of Mr. Dutfey’s assertion. Many interesting observations were made
upon these small but ferocious larve before they changed to pupe, and
the appearance of the perfect insect was awaited with much interest.
The first beetle developed about the middle of July and proved to be
the species named,
Comparatively few webs of the second brood of Hyphantria were seen
in and around Kirkwood in August, and extensive examination revealed
the fact that fully three-fourths of these also contained larvee of Plo-
chionus, which were busily engaged in reducing the numbers of the
rightful inhabitants. Nor is the beetle confined in its diet to the web
worm. I found the larve repeatedly during the present autumn in the
masses of leaves webbed together by the somewhat gregarious larva
of a Tortrix (Cacecia fervidana) and between the two leaves webbed by
various Tineids, especially Cryptolechia nubeculosa and C, schlegerella.
(I doubt not I may have occasion to deprecate its work in the future
51
in these groups.) That this Plochionus had not appeared this season
much to the east of St. Louis was evinced by the much webbed and de-
foliated orchard and forest trees noticed in Illinois and Indiana in Au-
gust and September.
As Mr. Duffey proposes soon to publish a history of the insect, with
detailed descriptions of its various stages, I defer offering my own notes
upon its habits and forms until after the appearance of his paper.
A FEW MORE INJURIOUS MICROS ON APPLE.
A very considerable number of Microlepidoptera, including Pyralide,
Phycitide, Tortricide, and Tineidw, have already been characterized
and catalogued among the more or less injurious insects of the orchard
and garden; but the observations of almost every year add to this list,
and I propose here to briefly describe a few which have not as yet been
placed on the roll, but which in this locality are annually so numerous
as to commit appreciable injury.
PENTHINA CHIONOSEMA, Zell.—The larve of this beautiful species
were, last year, uncommonly abundant during the month of May on the
leaves of apple, particularly in young orchards. They fold the leaves
at the midrib, or sometimes one edge over to the midrib, fastening the
edges all around firmly and feeding upon the inclosed upper surface.
Larva.—The larva is not especially characteristic, being of a pale opaque green
color, without maculation, except the rather inconspicuous glassy piliferous plates.
Head pale yellow, tinged with green, legs similarly colored; length from 16 to 17™™;
diameter, 3™™. Form subcylindrical, tapering but slightly either way from middle,
When full grown it incloses itself under a rolled edge of the leaf,
lining and strengthening the tube thus formed with a white silken web.
The moth appears early in June, and I have no record of a later brood,
although there may be one.
The original description, by Professor Zeller, is not accessible to me
at present, but it will suffice to note the following characters :
Palpi and tuft of the head rich ferruginous, antenne scarcely half the length of
the wing, fine, gray brown. Thoracic tuft dark brown. Wing expanse from 15 to
16 ™™—rather more than a half-inch. Ground color of primaries somewhat mottled
dark brown, with a slight suffusion of olive, diversified by three broad, indistinct,
irregular, obliquely transverse bands of purplish gray, having a somewhat metallic
reflection; these transverse bands broaden toward the inner margin, where they
almost coalesce. On the costal edge is a large, milk-white, rounded triangular or
nearly semicircular patch, extending along the costa from the middle third, in-
clusive, almost to the apex, constituting a most distinguishing and ornamental
character. Cilia purplish gray. Secondaries, silky, pale brown with lighter fringes.
Abdomen and legs pale brown. Under side of wings pale, rosy brown, the large
costal spots on this side inclining to orange.
PROTEOPTERYX SPOLIANA Clem.—The larva folds and webs into
clusters the young leaves of apple during the month of May, appear-
ing, preferably, on the shoots of small trees.
52
Larva.—When full grown it measures 10™™ in length by 24™™ in diameter, the
form being rather thick cylindrical; color translucent white, tinged with yellowish
green; surface velvety; piliferous plates small, glassy, giving rise to short, fine,
light hairs. Head and cervical collar same color as general surface or a little deeper
in shade, inclining to amber. The head is broad and flat, with red-brown trophi,
and a very large dark brown spot on each side. Legs and prolegs same color as gen-
eral surface.
When full grown it forms a tough, oval cocoon, thickly covered with
particles of soil, on the surface of the ground, occasionally just beneath
it. It is but single-brooded, and is very difficult to rear in confinement,
as it must be kept through the heat of summer and the cold of winter,
and if a little too damp it molds, while if moisture is withheld it dries
up. From almost innumerable larve collected during several years I
have only been successful in rearing two or three specimens, enough,
however, to determine the species, and, as the moths are always abun-
dant early in the spring on the trunks of orchard and forest trees, there
need be no scarcity of specimens for the cabinet:
Adult.—The moth expands 15™™, wings rather narrow. In color it closely simulates
the bark of the trees on which it naturally rests. The vestiture of the head is brown
interspersed with gray; palpi and antenn cinereous; thorax and abdomen pale
brown. Primaries brown, with a series of oblique double silvery streaks all along
the costal edge, extending about one-fourth across the wing; a large silvery spot of
irregular outline, inclosing a patch of dark brown, is situated near the outer edge of
the wing, and a less distinct patch of silvery scales occurs on the inner edge near the
middle, while a shading of the same color modifies the brown tint on other portions
of the wing. Cilia pale brown and cinereous intermixed. Secondaries cinereous,
shading on costal edge to pale brown; cilia dingy white. There is some variation
in distinctness of the markings and depth of coloring.
STEGANOPTYCHA PYRICOLANA Riley MS.—This is somewhat similar
to the above in coloring, but smaller and proportionally broader winged.
This bores the shoots of the second growth of apple in August and Sep-
tember, occasionally on recently planted trees, inflicting serious damage.
The larva spins scarcely any web, but bores downward through the ter-
minal bud, eutering the stem for from half an inch to an inch, sometimes
blackening all the growing points of a young tree.
Larva.—When full grown it is 8™™ long by 14™™ in diameter, slender, subeylindri-
eal, tapering slightly in both directions from middle segments; surface smooth;
incisions deep; color, pale cream yellow, somewhat translucent ; the dorsal surface
beautifully mottled with rose red. Piliferous warts and hairs only discernible with
alens. Ventral surface pale, slightly concave, and much wrinkled. Head elongate,
cordate, pale brown, shading to dark brown on the middle of each lobe; trophi prom-
inent, dark brown, with two or three long light hairs on each side. Supra-anal
plate oblong, large, dark, smoky brown. Legs and prolegs rather unusually de-
veloped.
I failed to rear the first specimens collected, most of them wandering
around in the jar until they died. Subsequently, by supplying them
with bits of pith or bark in which to bore, I succeeded in getting three
or four imagos between the last of September and the first of October.
53
The moth expands 19™, The head, thorax, and abdomen are densely covered
with long hair-like scales, of a dull gray-brown color with bluish reflections. Basal
half of primaries of similar color, but with more intermingling of blue and brown
‘scales. About the middle the wing is crossed by a broad, irregularly outlined band
of rich brown, sparsely intermingled with silvery scales, and the terminal third is
quite evenly mottled in brown and leaden gray, the costal edge of this portion being
ornamented with alternate oblique light and dark streaks extending about one-
fourth across the wing; cilia bluish gray ; secondaries lustrous pale brown, shading
to cinereous on costal edge ; cilia dingy white.
Professor Fernald, to whom a specimen was shown, considers it iden-
tical with Clemens’s S. salicicolana, which I believe breeds in willow galls,
but Dr. Riley pronounces it distinct, and he has types of Clemens’s
species. ;
GELECHIA INTERMEDIELLA ? Chambers.—This pretty Tineid appears
in its larval form on the tender leaves of apple early in May and again
in September. It gnaws the parenchyma from the upper surface, giv-
ing the leaves a burned and eroded appearance.
Larva.—8™ in length when mature, slender, cylindrical, tapering slightly in both
directions from middle ; incisions deep, giving it a submoniliform appearance. Gen-
eral color bluish green, acquiring a purple hue at maturity, with faint longitudinal
stripes of cream white. Head pale brown with a tinge of green, ornamented with
cream-colored markings on each side and arow of graduated cream-colored dots down
the middle of the face. First segment narrow, without perceptible shield. Thoracic
legs long, whitish, proceeding from papillated projections on the ventral surface.
This larva covers the leaves with fine web, in which it moves with
great agility, and in which it rests suspended, without touching the
surface of the leaf, except when feeding. It is semigregarious and very
irregular in its development, some clusters of the leaves showing very
recently hatched young, while on other clusters they will be full grown.
It pupates on surface of the leaf under a little round cover of dense web,
similar to those under which some spiders protect their eggs. The
moths emerge in about 3 weeks after pupation and hibernate in the per.
fect state.
Adult.—A beautiful species, expanding 12 or 13™™, Head and thorax dark gray,
more or less suffused with crimson; palpi dark gray, annulated with rosy white or
pale pink. Ground color of primaries leaden gray and rosy white; scales about
evenly intermixed. Three very irregular and variable, often interrupted, bands of
rich olive brown cross the wing, intermingled with some light golden brown or
ochreous scales; near the base and center of the wing these form quite distinct
patches. The apical third of the wing is margined with alternate dark brown and
rosy patches; cilia gray. Secondaries cinereous, with paler cilia. This species is
closely allied to both roseosuffusella Clem., and rubensella Cham., resembling in colora-
tion the latter and in size the former. Mr. Chambers says of it: ‘‘ Intermediate be-
tween roseosuffusella Clem., and rubensella Cham., with one or the other of whieh it
has hitherto been confounded. The third joint of the palpi is longer and more
acute than in rubensella, more like that of roseosuffusella, but the fore wings are much
less roseate than in either of the two other species, frequently showing no tinge of
the roseate hue. * * * As in rubensella (and sometimes in roseosuffusella), the first
dark band does not cover the base of the wing. The second band is like that of
roseosuffusella, but the third extends across the wing, the dorsal portion being, how-
ever, paler than the costal, and the costo-apical part of the wing is ochreo-fuscous.
54
This description, or rather these distinctions, of Mr. Chambers apply
to some examples, while to others they do not. Many specimens are
very roseate and richly colored, while a few appear almost plain black
and dull white. The three species are best distinguished in the larva
state, in which there are very decided differences. G. roseosuffusella
feeds on Clover, G. rubensella on Oak, while the species under con-
sideration, so far as my observations show, is confined to Apple. The
larval characters are also very diverse in the three species.
EXPERIMENTS WITH INSECTICIDES.
During the great prevalence of Aphididae in the spring I made much
use of pyrethrum and of the X. O. dust. Of the value of the former as
a remedy for these pests, except in the case of one or two species, I
have no occasion to change the favorable opinions already repeatedly
published. The X. O. dust was thoroughly tested on the following
Aphids: Aphis mali and Schizoneura lanigera on Apple; Aphis prunifolit
on Plum; Siphonophora rose on Rose; Myzus persice on Peach; Aphis
brassice on Cabbage; Aphis sp.? on Cucumbers and Squash; Siphono-
phora sp.? on Lettuce; S. crategi on Thorns; S. rudbeckie on Solidago;
Aphis ambrosic ou Ambrosia trifida, and Aphis chrysanthemi? on Chrys-
anthemum. With its effects on all of these I was well satisfied, although
in some cases it took several dustings to thoroughly clear a plant.
When applied with a powder bellows it causes the insects to drop to the
ground at once, where they may be pressed into the soil with the foot or
patted down with a trowel. The more delicate species succumb to a
single thorough dusting and never recover from the effects of contact
with the powder. This preparation will also destroy Siphonophora
avence, but whether it could in any way be applied to a field of infested
grain has not been demonstrated.
The Black Chrysanthemum Aphis is one of the greatest pests of the
flower garden and gives much trouble to both amateurs and profes-
sional florists. It hibernates on the plant and attacks the stolons as
soon as they appear in the spring, and unless great care is taken to
eradicate it, it is more or less numerous on the plants throughout the
summer, dwarfing and deforming them by its punctures and by the loss
of sap which it appropriates. As soon as the buds are formed it seems
to develop with four-fold fecundity and requires assiduous attention to
keep in check. The Buhach or pyrethrum powder is utterly useless
against this species, probably because the plant from which it is made
is so close an ally of the Chrysanthemum. The X. O. dust, composed
of creosote and tobacco, is the best remedy within my knowledge, killing
the Aphis without the slightest injury to the plant. Ihave found it
best to apply during the middle of the day when the dew is off. A few
minutes after dusting the plants, I pass along the rows or among the
pots, and give each branch a smart shake or a blast of air from the
empty puff, and every Aphis that has not previously dropped is dis-
55.
lodged, and ‘‘to make assurance doubly sure,” it is stamped into the
earth. On most of the insect foes of the plant lice the dust produced
no disastrous effect, but the larvae of Syrphidie would, in some cases, not
recover from the pungent coating.
Arsenites of ammonia.—This new preparation, for which F. J. Andres,
25 Pearl street, New York, is the agent, was sent to me for experiment,
in accordance with directions from the entomologist of the Department
of Agriculture. It did not reach me until about the 1st of June, too
late for use on a number of insects. It is a clear solution of arsenic in
aqua ammonia, and apparently does not differ much from a preparation
of my own devising, as reported on two years ago, and with the effects
of which on vegetation I was not entirely satisfied. The directions ac-
companying each of the gallon bottles, in which it is put up, are to use
one tablespoonful of the liquid to a gallon of water.
June7.—Weather clear and hot. Prepared a quantity of the fluid as di-
rected and had it applied to the following plants: To potatoes, on which
were a few Doryphora larve; to rose bushes, on which still lingered a
few larvie of Selandria rose, Characlea angulata, and Amphipyra pyramt-
doides; to cabbage, covered with full-grown and young larve of Pieris
rape; to cucumbers and squash infested with Diabrotica. It was too
late in the season to test it thoroughly on apple for the Codling Moth,
and as there were scarcely any peaches or plums or curculios, its effect
on the latter insect can not be reported upon. Portions of the trees as
well as of cherry were sprayed to discover its effect upon the foliage.
June 9.—Made the rounds of all plants sprayed and noted results as
follows:
Potato plants slightly scorched, edges of the leaves curled, larvee of
Doryphora mostly on the ground dead, beetles sickly.
Rose bushes uninjured, or very slightly burned where the leaves were
very tender; all larve killed.
Cabbage uninjured; all Pieris and other larve killed. Cucumbers
much injured, squash less so; striped beetles killed or vanished.
Peach and cherry foliage badly scorched, turned yellow. Plum and
apple only slightly injured. Other experiments later in the season
made with one tablespoonful of the poison to one and one-half gallons
of water were not injurious to any except the most delicate foliage,
while in most cases it sufficed to kill Sphinx quinquemaculata and Helio-°
this armigera on tomato, Darapsa myron, Cidaria diversilineata, Psycho-
morpha epimenis, and De.mia maculalis on grape, with but slight damage
to the foliage. The fruit being “bagged” was not touched by it.
Empretia stimulea on plum and pear and Datana ministra on oak also
speedily died from eating leaves that had been dampened with it.
I do not consider these experiments conclusive, as with the heat and
drought, vegetation was not by any means in a vigorous condition, and
therefore more liable to injury from poisonous applications. It isa
most convenient preparation and leaves no sediment to disfigure the
56
foliage, and will, I trust, be found, by more thorough experiment,
efficient as an insecticide when used of a strength that will preclude
injury to foliage.
Late in the summer a preparation of petroleum sludge with soap
was sent me from the New York Chemical Works for trial, but there
were very few insects at that time on which to test it, while its almost
intolerable and persistent odor is really a serious objection to its use,
especially in small gardens.
In making my experiments, I have used the Lewis Combination
Force Pump and Syringe, and consider them well adapted for use in
small orchards and vineyards, and especially adapted for purposes of
experimentation, where the larger and heavier appliances are not
necessary,
REPORT ON WORK OF THE SEASON.
By HERBERT OSBORN.
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.
AmEs, IowA, October, 1899.
Sir: I transmit herewith a report upon the work of the season, including mention
of certain insects that haye been observed during the season and notes regarding
certain others, observations on which are in progress, with the expectation of giving
more detailed accounts of their life histories and habits.
There is much yet to be done on the insects affecting grass before anything like a
full report can be made upon them, but I shall hope to bring the work of the present
season into shape for submission at the end of the year.
The work on the parasites of domestic animals has been continued and a part is
already submitted for printing, while a considerable amount of other matter is in
form to be presented at an early date.
Very respectfully,
HERBERT Osborn.
rot Cony peekulianive
U. S. Entomologist.
During the past summer there has been no great depredation by any
single insect pest in the State, but a number of the common species of
insects have been working with their accustomed energy, and the losses
from this source in the State have probably been up to the average of
ordinary seasons.
The observations on insects affecting grass crops have been continued,
and I am only the more strongly impressed with the importance of the
insects affecting these crops in this State, and believe that the estimates
given in my last year’s report as to the probable loss from this source
to have been by no means overstated.
Judging by the reports of the correspondents of the Iowa Weather
and Crop Service, who represent every section of the State, the insects
that have caused most extensive injury are those infesting meadows
and pastures and sod land planted to corn. Not only are there numer-
ous reports of injury by insects to timothy, to pastures, and to corn
planted on land previously in grass, but numerous mention of poor
condition in meadows and pastures, shortage in grass and hay crop,
57
58
ete., which, to any one familiar with the great number of insects now
infesting grass land in this region, tell a certain story as to at least one
of the great sources of loss.
Frequent mention is made of the Cutworms, Grubworms, Wire-
worms, etc., and it is evident that a very great variety of species are
included in this list; but while I am certain that many species of Cut-
worms belonging to the common species of Noctuidz are included in
this list, I believe that much of this injury is due to the species of
Crambus treated in detail in my report for 1887, the Dried Crambus
(Crambus exsiccatus), or as called in the larval stage, the Sodworm or
Turf Webworm. ‘This has been very plentiful here in the adult form
the present season, though by no means so abundant as in 1887, and I
have no doubt that it has been as abundant in other parts of the State.
The work of this species in meadows, however, would not be readily
distinguished from that of Cutworms by those unfamiliar with the
habits of insects, and even in corn the effect on the plants is not easily
to be distinguished from the effects of Cutworms, Wireworms, or other
forms of insects attacking the stalks at or near the surface of the
ground.
LEAF HOPPERS IN GRASS.
In my report of last season I mentioned a number of species of leaf
hoppers (Jassidw) that are destructive in grass land. Further observa-
tion and collection in this same line has served to strengthen my opin-
ion as to the great amount of injury to be attributed to these minute
insects. A number of species particularly of the genus Deltocephalus
occur in immense numbers in grass land, and among the most common
of those observed here are the Deltocephalus (Jassus) inimicus Say,
treated of in last year’s report, but associated with these are D. debilis
Uhler., D. Sayi Fitch, D. Melsheimeri Fitch, and a number of species
apparently as yet undescribed. " AA. CARRAL An nN {~ PR Nate al f G
ARRAY ‘al ‘ala Noval TAR Aa nA A AM Aap
; OED Oe IPL PO ele Net ee 5 si aig andi odeaneanatamioionteln Ae
: ante Sivtehorent te 1p 2 oNed pees a <9 Z ‘ ae Wt Fe PIS Meal Miles SSE Si Earle
: a aa ae dee Ss erie RNa: wen Esra Nate e Mel - pata alata - a aan ne ew — 7 “G TIS "Tat B=
Tn aA AAG MR AAR ES “Vy : IEE ales
*
te bs Ae f Pl
¥ RRA afte ay 5.
AA
SAA