MMI WN AS . IS We) XX \ A \N AY SY RAY SN SA WS WY » \\ AY AS SN GY Z tj YA tj g Z Z ttn tj YEG, Lizz tty, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION iA. S, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 _ ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS Numbers 68-74 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1964 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, ne: ae Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 rice $2. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, BureEAvu oF AMERICAN ErHNoLoGy, Washington, D.C., March 31, 1963. Str: I have the honor to submit the accompanying manuscripts, entitled ‘‘The Prehistory of Panam4 Viejo,” by Leo P. Biese; ‘“The Language of Santa Ana Pueblo,” by Irvine Davis; “Observations on Certain Ancient Tribes of the Northern Appalachian Province,” by Bernard G. Hoffman; “El Limén, an Early Tomb Site in Coclé Province, Panama,” by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling; “‘Archeo- logical Notes on Almirante Bay, Bocas del Toro, Panama,” by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling; ‘‘The Archeology of Taboga, Urab4, and Taboguilla Islands, Panama,” by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling; “Iroquois Masks and Maskmaking at Onondaga,” by Jean Hendry, and to recommend that they be published as a bulletin of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Very respectfully yours, Frank H. H. Roserrts, Jr., Director. Dr. LEONARD CARMICHAEL, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution. ae ee Zain t iSONI4® NOV 3 0 1964 LIBRARY CONTENTS No. 68. The Prehistory of Panam4 Viejo, by Leo P. Biese_________-_--- No. 69. The Language of Santa Ana Pueblo, by Irvine Davis_____-_---- No. 70. Observations on Certain Ancient Tribes of the Northern Appala- ehian Province, by Bernard G. Hoffman. —._....=..-2..---<. No. 71. El Limén, an Early Tomb Site in Coclé Province, Panama, by Matthew W./and Marion Stirlng=. 122-2282 No. 72. Archeological Notes on Almirante Bay, Bocas del Toro, Panama, by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling... 2-50-22 -2-.- No. 73. The Archeology of Taboga, Urab4, and Taboguilla Islands, Panama, by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling-._...________-_- No. 74. Iroquois Masks and Maskmaking at Onondaga, by Jean Hendry-_- eT MAT ZOO - ii Jj tet ot « ee! p | Cotter) and. at irae reel 2 ao cpoipaml aff oie ye > oy SOS ov ae ¥ 7 ’ * fiver nas — 5 72 aed Ww WOE . atenlawtls Fs o wt vi i , wietlw' mh SQ: 6) ore oe ftw AA le. « -_ hy Ao Ny : v ® = q ] aon, 7 Panama Viejo. Upper, Paneled urn cover; lower, side view. Approximately 4% natural size. Courtesy Dr. Russell H. Mitchell. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 68 THE PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO By LEO P. BIESE 682—611— 64 2 Preface. — == Introduction_ Historical accounts of Old Panama Descript Indian settlement of Malambo he sites 2. == Description Former investigations Method Burial practices Burial urns Burial offerings Funerary votive ware Stonework___ Ceramics -- -- Nature of the sample Size Red ware Brown ware Painted wares Rimsherds Decorative techniques Design motifs Ant Incising Surface designs Relief modeling and applique Trade ware Secondary use of artifacts Spindle whorls Miscellaneous ceramic objects Classification Discussion___ Geograp Contacts and migrations Chronology Interpretive summary Bibliography CONTENTS 1ons.omOldeeanamas oa. es. year ema eee Ee er oh ee ke Gi present idvestieations 1). 220 eis Yee! LSet ee ke ae anG shape OL wesceleun. ot 2h ten bn 2 Bee ee he ee WiQ@aGlOMe & ers koe ape se eee ace ee od Rh yeas ice nh OB aot hropomorphic effigies HICALEGUS BTU UGLOMes ee A ky ee tee UI ae ee wee ee a on i i i ww ww we we wa = = A = a a ee eee eee mere ---- 4. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES (All plates except frontispiece follow page 52) Frontispiece. . Sacrifice burial. . Serpent burial urn. . Serpent burial urn. . Painted urn and panel from incised monkey urn. Votive ware double turtle-monkey effigy. Votive ware double bird effigy. . Miscellaneous votive ware. . Miscellaneous brown ware. . Stone artifacts. . Red ware vessels. . Painted wares. . Lizard effigy vessel. . Incised relief brown ware. . Incised relief brown ware. . Coclé-type red line ware and humpback effigy jar. . Incised relief brown ware. . Incised relief brown ware. . Incised relief brown ware. . Rim sherds. . Rim sherds. 21. Miscellaneous polychrome and paneled red ware. 22. Spindle whorls. 23. Miscellaneous ceramic objects. 24, Artifacts from Venado Beach site. 25. Artifacts from Madden Lake site. | SHAN OWPWNHE SO OND Orb db TEXT FIGURES 1. Design index of black-on-white paneled burial urn covers_-_--_------ 2, Raised serpent desi¢n from burial urn. 22-2 eee ee oe Incisedsbrown: Wane. oss eee a ee eee AS Incised brown warespedestalicups=——- 2-4 2 a eee pe lake dastone weaponepOints soos 5 na Sa eee Gt "Stone Cclig.ss nat 2 ort 2 OSL a eee Pe -SbORCCOlUS a4 ate a eases eas one eee eee So EMEC WVAIRO rt a 9 bea re ne Ae tn ee, CS G. Redawate 22222523 2sur re sotto ERO 8 Ue ee, ee hO: “Vainbed Wares) > <2 seus ere ott it Ro ee Bee Form pronles :& meets oo Ae ea a a Oe oe i. Detailotlivard emery rien 2 bso ee Re Ee ee 3: Poly chromeemicy | ape. sss Sees ee SE See Saas E.. Polychrome €fity gar ss 222 o-s2seceeusee Seo aes ANE to. . Brown ware wWhistles=~0045 Son a oo ae ee ee nes es oo eee MAPS 1. Historical map of Panamé4 Viejo (Old Panama) (Facing)______------ 2. Wie OF Ge -Bit@s sscns<2 2 ese eoh eb beet es ee ee 3. Distribution-of-cultural traitsess-22322ss22ssssessesceson572eee PREFACE The nature of the countryside surrounding Panama Viejo has been changed radically by industrialization. Originally it was a broad and grassy plain surrounded by multiple low hills and fronted by the sea. The climate was milder and always had less rainfall than the Atlantic side of the Isthmus. Food was easily obtainable the year round from the abundant deer, peccary and other small game, and easily caught fish of the gulf. Numerous shell heaps of prehistoric sites bordering the gulf attest to the importance of mussels and clams in the native diet. Fresh water was available from many nearby streams although the Rio Abajo itself was foul and contaminated by salt water at high tide. As a dwelling site it suffered from the 20-foot high tides of the gulf which twice daily left half a mile of mud flat and rotting organic matter exposed. Additionally, the evil surrounding mangrove swamps served as a breeding place for mosquitoes and other noxious insects. It afforded, however, adequate conditions for the support of life and the establishment of a sedentary culture which maintained peace through trade or tribute and did not require a militarily defensible position. I wish to thank especially Dr. Alejandro Méndez and the Museo Nacional de Panama for their support and encouragement, and for the loan of the Museum’s Panama Viejo collection for study and photography. To no lesser extent do I thank the landowner, Sr. Enrique LeFevre, for permission to collect from this site. Thanks are also especially due Dr. Russell H. Mitchell for permission to use the material illustrated in the frontispiece and plates 10, 24, 6, and 25, as well as for his encouragement and helpful advice based on long experience in the Isthmian area. Dr. Mitchell also provided much of the valuable reference material. I also wish to thank Sr. Dan Sander for the material used for plate 24; the Canal Zone Library for permission to use the historical map (map 1); and the “Panama Archaeologist” for permission to reprint the spindle whorl figures (pl. 22). Mr Gerald A. Doyle, Jr., prepared the site map; my wife, Lucinda T. Biese, did the ink drawings; and I took the photographs. Special thanks are due to my wife for suffering through innumer- able mosquito-ridden field trips, sherd-sorting periods, and manu- script revisions. oe. Bs, Panama Canal Zone. 1961. THE PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO By Leo P. Brrsz INTRODUCTION Panama Viejo is the name I have applied to a combined residence and burial site situated adjacent to the well-known Spanish ruins of the same name approximately 6 miles northeast of the present Panama City. _ The Spanish ruins (map 1) occupy an area approximately 1 mile long by % mile wide with the long axis parallel to, and fronting on, the Pacific Ocean at the Gulf of Panama. To the northeast of the ruins are several acres of mangrove swamp containing a few isolated shacks. On the east is the old port, now a semidry mangrove swamp. Directly south is the Bay of Panama. Traveling southwest from the ruins one passes through an area of several acres, sparsely populated by settlements of ramshackle houses, which is followed by the suburb of San Francisco de Calete and modern Panama City. The northern- most portion of the ruins is delimited by the Rio Abajo over which passes the Punta Del Rey (King’s Bridge) and the beginning of the Portobelo Trail. Farther north and northwest lies the large modern cemetery of Parque LeFevre. The archeological site herein discussed lies on the property of Sr. Enrique LeFevre, at the back of the ruins proper, in an angle formed by Diagonal 10 (a modern roadway which bisects the ruins) and the Rio Abajo and bordered by the cemetery (map 2). It first was discovered in 1958 during grading operations preparatory to the expansion of the cemetery. HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF OLD PANAMA There is a great wealth of descriptive source material available to the interested reader on the later history of ‘‘Old Panama.”” Because of its position of importance in the development of the New World, many eyewitness accounts have been preserved and their value in- creased by lengthy modern English summaries. In order to establish the presence of a historical Indian village on the excavation site, however, it will be sufficient to reconstruct only the story of Old Panama’s founding and early years. 7 8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Under the Emperor Ferdinand of Spain, Antigua was established as the first stronghold on the Atlantic coast of the New Continent. In 1513 the governorship of the eastern half of Panama was given to Pedro Arias de Avila (Pedrarias the Cruel) under whom Captains Diego de Albites and Antonio Tello de Guzman were sent forth, toward Balboa’s newly discovered ‘‘South Sea,’ to obtain gold and to establish a string of outposts for possible settlement. In the latter months of 1515, the captains arrived at the Pacific coast near a small Indian village which the local inhabitants called “Panama.” The name is generally accepted now to mean “Place of Many Fishes,”’ but at least one chronicler, Hererra, states that the name referred to the huge local trees which the natives termed ‘‘Panamas.” Two years later, Licentiate Gaspar de Espinosa had been appointed to replace the beheaded Vasco Nuifiez de Balboa in the work of explor- ing the Pacific coast. The expedition of Espinosa camped at this same Indian village while awaiting the return of Governor Pedrarias from a pillaging trip to the Pearl Islands and Taboga Island in the Gulf of Panama. It is possible that this village was in the vicinity of the present Venado Beach, although the exact site is not known. The actual city was founded on a site a few miles farther east where the land was firmer and afforded better grazing for the cattle. There is no record of any Indian inhabitants at this latter location. In 1519, Pedrarias officially founded the city of Panam4 with characteristic pomp and ceremony, and in 1521 he was granted a charter and coat of arms. Thereafter, the story is first one of slow development and then of rapid growth after the conquest of Peru by Pizarro. A transcon- tinental trail was constructed from the city of Portobelo and Nombre de Dios over which the gold of Panama and Peru was transported for shipment to Spain. For the next century or so the story wanes and finally closes with the destruction of the city in 1671 by the buccaneer Sir Henry Morgan. DESCRIPTIONS OF OLD PANAMA The city had small beginnings and was relatively stable for the first 75 years. The first extant report is provided by the historian Oviedo, who visited the site in 1529, after 10 years of its existence, and stated that it was composed of 75 shacks which ‘‘were narrow and long, and sometimes the tide will wash right into their homes. To the North [the archeological site] was an invironment of mud and swamps, which caused the lack of sanitation.” ? Twelve years later, Jeronime (Girolamo) Benzoni, an Italian his- torian, remarked that there were 112 wooden houses and calculated 1 Oviedo y Valdes: La historia general de las Indias, Seville, 1535 (in Sosa, 1955). Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 9 about 4,000 people, including the much more numerous Indians and African slaves (Sosa, 1955, p. 29). It may be mentioned here that the expansion of the city to its present ruined outlines and establish- ment of the permanent stone structures dates from a much later period, at least the early 17th century. Carles (1960), in compiling various sources, says that the city had two important disadvantages. The first was the rather poor harbor which, because of high tides, made it necessary to anchor ships at some distance. Secondly, the water supply, except for a few brackish wells, was a half league distant at the Lavenderas (now Juan Dias) and was itself frequently dry. Because of these disadvantages, in 1534 a warrant was issued by Queen Juana (Joanna) ordering the city to change its location. However, this warrant was overthrown by the inhabitants because of the consequent loss of property and the abun- dant food supply from nearby mussel spawning grounds. From later sources we know that this place was an important food source for the prehistoric Indians as well. INDIAN SETTLEMENT OF MALAMBO It is from this point that confusion begins about the actual details of the city. The controversy centers about the location of the historical settlements of ‘‘Malambo” (Indian) and ‘‘Pererdevidas”’ (Negro). It is of importance because Malambo has been variously placed directly within the boundaries of our present archeological report as well as across the road and consequently out of the im- mediate area. The only authentic map is that made by the engineer Roda in 1609 and reproduced by Sosa (1955) from the original in the Council of the Indies. This map shows only swamp in the site area with no mention of fringe settlements. A detailed description sent to Spain at this time does not mention the settlements. It is probable that the Spanish Archives contains, among the many reports and letters of the time, some which specifically mention Malambo, but these unfortunately are unavailable to me. Both Anderson (1911) and Bancroft (1882) contain translations of exten- sive excerpts from these letters which describe accurately every street and house over various periods of time, but neither of these authors mentions Malambo. On the other hand, Sosa gives: To the North the city prolonged the margins of the port, extending to the settlements of Malambo, to the King’s Bridge and a few steps further to the rocky road leading to Porto Bello; on the other hand, the city extended behind the convents of San Francisco and La Merced, and with the suburbs of Pierde Vidas it reached the Matanza. [Sosa, 1955, p. 29.] Matanza is now called St. Cristopher’s Hill and this account would place Malambo on the opposite side of the Portobelo Trail and out 10 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 of the area in question. Unfortunately, however, Sosa does not give the reference from which he derived this account. Carles (1960), too, locates Malambo to the northeast but also gives no references and presumably took some of his material from the Sosa report. The Canal Zone Library possesses a copy of a late 18th-century map which is a modification of the original Roda map with additions of the later structures. It is used herein, with permission, as map 1, as it affords a good view of the entire site. It places Malambo on the other side of the trail and marks the present area of investigation as “dense tropical jungle, quagmires and swamp.” Unfortunately, the name of the map’s maker is obscured and no further references are available. Quite possibly the references of Sosa and, later, Carles, were to this map. Much later Shafroth prepared a map, which is also in the Canal Zone Library and forms a portion of his book (Sha- froth, 1953), describing Malambo as being directly over the areas of investigation. He gives no reference for this location and, in addition, places the Rio Gallinero under the King’s Bridge and the Rio Algarrobo to the far west, whereas Sosa and Carles interchange these names. At least one investigator of this site (Smith, 1960) suggests the remains belong to those Indians present at the site before the first Spanish occupation. Definite information will not be available with- out radiocarbon dates or at least stratigraphic links with adjacent cultures, but, as will be seen from the discussion to follow, the ceramic relationship to other finds in Panama even at this early stage of knowl- edge would tend to indicate a tentative date of at least 400 years prior to the first Spanish settlement. It is my contention that this archeological site represents a new culture to be reported from Panama and that it existed in the period immediately preceding the Coclé polychrome period. The site was abandoned, reclaimed by tropical jungle until the period of Spanish occupation, again “‘lost,’”’ and only rediscovered during the leveling operations in 1958. THE SITE (Map 2) DESCRIPTION The area investigated measured approximately 500X1,000 yards. This portion was discovered when preparations were made to expand the adjacent cemetery and the earth was cleared of growth by means of heavy earth-moving machinery. During the leveling operations, multiple burial urns were torn through and redistributed across the surface. The land is a densely overgrown tropical semiswamp which remains fairly dry during the months of December through May but, 11 o PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE Anthrop. Pap. No. 68] ‘aus aY1 Jo defj—'z avy BEE) SNINY OF3IA WWYNYd Sey lap spongy ; ths 7 c Ae ti (suiny ) aso wes ap yuauog (3 Realy Suyait suieway 113M 3 asnoy yI11g dweng 7 Wd ia, TY sual jays &3 syejing vadg spo sjeiing win Q Payeaeaxy jou sjeling xX HSM Ug qnasa17 JUAIAIT ANOUWd 682-611—64——_4 12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 because of poor drainage, has a great deal of standing water during the rainy season. The surrounding area, from which the site is isolated by a series of low hills, is an essentially level plain 2 miles wide. St. Cristopher’s Hill is a hillock within the area about 2,000 yards to the west. It is a solitary outcrop now somewhat lower than in Spanish times as a result of erosion and the erection of several structures on its summit. Isolated sherds are scattered throughout the region as far as the hill, and it is possible that diffuse occupation may have occurred at least to this point. The region is private land and was not investigated. The area north of the site also contains scattered sherds for another 500 yards on the opposite side of the Rio Abajo. In the latter portion there is a higher concentration of Spanish rubbish and the remains of a large colonial pottery kiln. This portion also has been cleared and from surface surveys apparently is not a part of the major site. The soil is composed of approximately 6 feet (ranging from 4 to 8) of a brown sandy clay which affords somewhat better drainage and ceramic preservation than might be expected. There are isolated lenses of higher sand content averaging 1 foot in thickness. The strata are underlain throughout by a calcareous shell conglomerate known as coquina. Except for isolated burial pits partially excavated in the coquina or its natural depressions at Venado Beach, this is a culturally sterile layer present at approximately the same depth throughout the entire Pacific littoral of the Gulf of Panama. A significant difference is that areas closer to the sea reflect the geo- chronological changes in shoreline by a series of differing shell and sand layers. Such layering is absent at this site. There is presently a deep brown-black homogeneous humus topsoil of approximately 1- foot thickness in the burial area. It is impossible to assess accurately the degree of soil disturbance, but a general inspection of the site indicates that an average of 3 feet was removed and pushed to one side for partial construction of a temporary road. The southern portion of the site has less topsoil and in some places the underlying sandy clay is exposed. In addition to the clearing operations, daily exposure of the land to heavy tropical rains throughout two rainy seasons has further eroded the land. Many of the sherds and at least two urns were exposed as a result. In poor runoff areas, however, the heavy rains succeeded in pooling an additional few inches of topsoil and obscuring surface finds. FORMER INVESTIGATIONS The site was partially investigated in 1960, with surface collections and several test pits, under the joint efforts of the Museo Nacional de Panama and an Air Force employee, H. Morgan Smith. The material Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 13 recovered is presently in the possession of Mr. Smith at Albrook Field, Canal Zone, and has not been published. Since its discovery, the site has unfortunately been subjected to the daily raids of children and an occasional local citizen. While these raids have been confined to the immediate subsurface reachable with a machete, at least 5 burials have been demolished in my presence by upward of 15 children at atime. Asa result, undoubtedly many whole vessels of the utility class have been lost for future study. In addition to the material presented here, I have located eight vessels which were purchased from local scavengers, in collections among Panama residents and Canal Zone personnel. As these vessels were all of the simplest kind represented by other material in the collection, they were not included in this report. METHOD OF PRESENT INVESTIGATION Soil disturbance and lack of time while the site was being prepared for expansion of the cemetery precluded extensive trenching. The method, then, consisted of the following program: Burials —Excavation of undisturbed burials exposed on the surface or found by probing the immediate subsurface. Testing pits which yielded burials are recorded as such rather than as pits. Dense accumulations of urn fragments and skeletal material uninvestigated because of their derangement are indicated on the map. Shell lenses:—Two lenses indicated on the map were cleared completely to the sterile coquina, yielding three burials discussed below. Surface collecttons.—All artifacts with the exception of plain red ware sherds and burial urn fragments were collected for later analysis as described under the section on ceramics. Test pits—Five pits measuring 1 meter square and 1 meter deep were placed about the periphery in an attempt to determine the limits of the cemetery and heavy artifact concentrations. Purchases.—All of the whole vessels mentioned were purchased from children at the site; thus only an approximate location is known, i.e., sector of the burial area. In addition, several more elaborate vessels are shown from other collections. Pertinent material has been included from the large collection of the Museo Nacional de Panam4. These artifacts are present without context and either were purchased or brought to the museum during the active seasons. Sporadic finds have led to the reasonable assumption that the site proper actually extends considerably farther to the north and west, but these adjacent areas presently are closed to investigations. There is evidence of probable discontinuous occupation as far as the present day Vina del Mar and San Francisco de Calete suburbs, where similar utility vessels have been discovered during excavations for house foundations. Map 2 shows only the extent of the present in- vestigation. 14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 BURIAL PRACTICES The widespread surface derangement made it impossible to define a precise plan of either the concentration or configuration of burials. The entire west end of the site literally was paved with sherds from undecorated urns which had been crushed by the earth-moving machinery. From this extensive litter of bone and urn fragments it could be seen that the western sector was primarily a burial area containing a slight admixture of living debris. The eastern sector was a dwelling site containing only sporadic burials. The distribu- tion did not change gradually, but rather there appeared to be a sharp demarcation between cemetery and residence areas. Test pits established the size of the cemetery to be about 100 X 200 yards. Distribution of fragments further suggested a maximum of 100 burials in the concentrated area; probably considerably fewer. There well may be many more isolated burials in the peripheral area and outside the clearing, but this would appear to be a rather small cemetery in comparison with the usual Panama site. Burials were of two major types: open burial in a simple trench or interment in urns. Within this cemetery, burials were mainly those of the urn type. Only six open burials were identified with any degree of certainty. The large number of intact utility ware vessels 2-4 feet under the present surface of this area, would seem to indicate the sites of other open burials lacking skeletal remains because of climatic conditions. Almost all the urns were located at approximately the same level but, by random shallow trenching between the smashed urns, several were found undisturbed in situ. Some of these were almost exposed after the rains and were only a few inches under the present surface. In each case they were within 3 feet of the new surface, representing the deepest ‘“‘average depth” of these urns and thus escaping the grading operations. All, however, were badly pressure broken and squashed to less than half of their original height. The condition of many fragments with rounded smooth breaks suggested breakage by earth pressure long before the present clearing operations. Surface or subsurface grave indications in the form of soil markings usually were absent. Red clay pockets were discovered in the area; in one case surrounding a plain urn, in another, surrounding an open burial. Five others were investigated and found to disappear after 1-2 feet; these may have been open burials without offerings in which the skeletal fragments had disappeared completely. Soil underneath the red clay pockets was trenched down to the coquina, as were several test pits. No deeper burials, such as those of Venado Beach (Lothrop, 1954) were found. Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 15 Skeletal preservation was erratic, but in general exceedingly poor. A single section of femur might be well preserved, hard, and dense, while fragments a few feet away were little more than dust and could not be cleaned. Most of the harder fragments were in areas of high shell content, while bone material in the urns was uniformly un- salvageable. Tooth remains followed the general pattern of poor preservation and indicate a considerable antemortum wear of grinding surfaces, but they were not otherwise diagnostic. Four open burials were found undisturbed. All skeletons were fully extended, face up, and oriented north-south. All were adults; three male and one unidentified. No flexed or secondary burials were found. None of the open burials were in clear association with funerary offerings. In the absence of distinctive soil markings there was no indication of the exact size or shape of the orginal graves. The most remarkable burials, both in preservation and attitude, were two parallel skeletons found in a shell lens. Both of these demonstrated the wide-open mouth and had the head in hyper- extension with the occiput touching the cervical spine (pl. 1). Pres- ervation did not allow demonstration of a possible cervical fracture. Six additional open burials were present in wide random distribution as indicated by surface collections of skeletal fragments without urn sherds. None of these were identifiable as to sex or orientation, but all were adults. BURIAL URNS Almost all of the urns are plain; only two complete ones were recovered, both with raised designs. One incomplete set of sherds from a painted urn was also found. A large number of decorated fragments, however, indicated this type of urn to be by no means rare. The typical urn is globular with a rounded bottom. On the average they measure 50 cm. in height and 60 cm. in maximum diameter with a 30-cm. opening. The inflection point is about half- way up the vessel. The urns are constructed of well-fired, coarse, granular clay tem- pered with coarse grit. In some cases this is a sand containing microscopic bits of silica and bearing minute gold particles which are visible under 10 magnification. The sherds are very strong and difficult to break by hand. The paste color is a medium brown with mottled black-to-green areas indicating irregular firing. There is often a reddish brown smooth surface exactly like that on the smaller utility vessels. Only the thicker areas show a central underfired zone. Thickness is greatest at the bottom (1.2 cm.) but is maintained fairly regularly up the vessel walls well above the inflection point. At the lip, thickness is approximately 0.7 cm. All lips have a plain, smooth 16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 taper without evidence of secondary elaboration. Dry weight of the urns often runs as much as 30 pounds. There are no lugs or handles. There was insufficient evidence to corroborate prior burning of the bones, but the size of the vessel mouths would favor secondary burial. LIDS Several urns were capped with large fragments of other broken vessels but most were covered by shallow bowls with a flaring rim. These are generally about 40 cm. in diameter, 15 cm. in depth, and modeled of the same paste as the urns. Like the urns, they frequently were plain and given a red to orange-brown smooth slip. Unlike the urns, however, the lids were of thinner construction and hence somewhat better fired. A typical lid is shown (reconstructed) in plate 3. At first they might seem to be utilitarian basins, but their close fit, exact size, and absence from other parts of the site make it probable that they were constructed specifically for this purpose. Fragments indicate that perhaps from 5-10 percent of the lids bore a white rim with overpainting of black geometric designs, con- trasting sharply with the red-brown slip. A particularly good example is shown as the frontispiece. Several of the designs are shown in figure 1. The black-on-white coloration has been found on the inside and outside rims, but never on both rims on the same vessel. The inner rim is more commonly painted. In no case did the design extend onto the slipped surface of the vessel proper. Hence it is not a true polychrome since the design itself is in black on white bichrome. It is termed herein a “‘black-on-white-rimmed red ware” and may be stylistically related to the paneled red ware of Coclé. This coloration has not been found on vessels other than burial urn lids and represents not only the only painted ware found in any quantity on the site, but the only one which could be considered to be distinctive. DECORATED URNS One decorated urn was recovered with a raised serpent design on opposite sides of the vessel mouth. The head is applique, the re- mainder “raised.”’ It is shown in situ in plate 2, and reconstructed in plate 3. A schematic drawing of the serpent itself is given in figure 2. This design is unusual both in size and in style and, to my knowledge, has not been encountered previously in Central America, though it may be related to the serpent design of Veraguas polychrome. It appears to be a stylized sea creature. Sherds of similar designs, all incomplete, are discussed under ‘‘Ceramics.’’ The vessel contained a very poorly preserved fragmentary adult skeleton and a single plain plate of utility ware as described below, and it was Anthrop..F2P. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 17 SA | a || | a) ae) a) Oh Figure 1.—Design index of black-on-white paneled burial urn covers. closed with a typical undecorated lid. Sherd collections of similar fragments indicate other urns of the same type were present but rare. A further burial vessel was uncovered bearing a striking double lizard design in raised red ware (pl. 12 and fig. 12). This particular ware is typical of the site and will be discussed in greater detail below. In size and shape the vessel was thought to represent second- ary use of a cracked water- or grain-storage jar for burial. It con- tained a poorly preserved infant skeleton but no offerings, and it 18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 & ie c—- EDDY Se EDDY . py, [ABS JES yeh S/F TV LG JFf ZH. Z A/F NX SNE INN XB =\ = 5 “\ 3 \= s/A\ 2 “\FX Z\ 3} 2 AZ“ sS/A fF AZ Zz VAL BRAG JR] AB {Z\ 3 SAE AZ‘ BYE AYA: é TENE AZ JS |? Ae BRAG yur JAH A WU Ja? \Z > AY NDAQIEAY 5 yy ay. ape yy, DE Ficure 2.—Raised serpent design from burial urn. was capped by the upper part of an identical vessel bearing fragments of the same double lizard design. A third complete decorated urn recently has been acquired by the Museo Nacional and is restored completely. This urn is of the same approximate size as the one just described and is elaborated on each side of the opening by a highly realistic monkey (pl. 4). Like several of the other designs, the body of the monkey was formed by pushing outward the soft clay from the interior of the vessel. The limbs are elaborated further by shell stamping. PAINTED URNS Approximately 75 percent of an urn-size vessel bearing a red and black on white geometric design (pl. 4) was in fragments on the surface of the central burial area. Three other fragments, not from the same vessel, also were found on the surface. There was no associated skeletal material, so the use of the vessel is only inferred from location and size. Again, this is a black-bordered red on white ware and not a true polychrome in the sense of having three or more colors as a primary design element. This type of design was not found on any other vessel, but similar designs are known from ca- rafes and small bowls from Coclé Province. Simple bichrome geo- metric patterns of this type are common throughout the Americas. The documentation of urn burials in southern Central America is especially important since this is considered to be primarily a later South American trait which may be an indicator of counter- migration. On the other hand, this burial custom is well known from the Southern United States, Mexico, and as far south as Nicaragua. From the latter there is a gap in the existence of the trait until La Gloria on the Atlantic coast of Colombia, near the Panama border (Linné, 1929). The urns recovered from Ancon Hill and presently in the Canal Zone museum previously were widely known but un- documented. Similar urns were also reported from Venado Beach Anthrop..; 22. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 19 (Lothrop, 1954) and the custom is known throughout the Madden Lake area. I have found burial urns on the Azuero Peninsula con- taining typical El Hatillo polychrome and Veraguas-style tumbaga eagle pendants. With future location of urn burials from southern Central America, particularly Costa Rica, and better age estimates, we well may be able to trace direct southward migrations from the cultures to the north. BURIAL OFFERINGS There is a general paucity of funerary offerings at this site. Most of the urns were devoid of pottery, and goldwork conspicuously is absent. Some of the urns contained simple utilitarian pottery, unornamented plates, and small to medium-sized red ware pots. Of these, three plates, two wide-mouthed bowls, and three narrow- mouthed pots were recovered from urns. In each case they were the only vessel in a given urn. Only 8 out of 20 definable urns con- tained even this type of offering. Since they differ in no way from the general refuse sherds throughout the site they are discussed below under “Ceramics.” In only one case, grave No. 2, was a trace of food offering in the form of 6 gm. of carbon found within a wide-mouthed bowl. A few urns contained decorated ware. Metal- work, coral, jade, shell, or other jewelry materials were completely absent. FUNERARY VOTIVE WARE The most remarkable and locally distinctive ceramic type from this site is the brown incised ceremonial ware: exceptionally fine elaborate vessels which betoken a high degree of skill in pottery culture. With the sole exception of a tribowled candelabra, these objects all were found unassociated in the burial area. A combination of their elaborate nature, location, and scarcity is interpreted to indicate that they should be considered apart from the other artifacts as a special class of votive ware restricted to funerary use. Related un- published specimens from Venado Beach and Madden Lake are present in the Museo Nacional and in several local private collections. They are all light to medium chocolate brown in color with a fine- textured paste. The temper is of fine grit. Broken edges of the thicker (1 cm.) sections show a green to gray center zone of incom- plete firmg. Plate 5, the most complex piece, was actually in two separate fragments found more than a month apart and later recon- structed. It is a double-bowled fixture resembling a candelabra (14 cm. high and 24 cm. maximum width) and containing multiple effigies. Each bowl represents a turtle, while each supporting arm terminates in a humanoid face. The center junction of the arms and 20 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 base bears, on each side, a modeled head with four stylized limbs resembling a howler monkey. The base and underside of the bowls are elaborated with geometrical patterns in incised lines and punched dots. The hollow base is flat on the bottom and contains small pellets which rattle. There are five holes leading to the interior of the base. A record of a very similar vessel found at Venado Beach was published with a suggestion of its possible use as a type of oil lamp (Vinton, 1951). Plate 6 shows two views of a like vessel from the Museo Nacional collection. In this case there is only a single de- sien, a bird. In plate 6, a, a slightly different type of bird head, evidently from the same class of vessel, is shown to illustrate the variation in feather elaboration. A related “single candelabra” is shown in plate 7, a, presumably a crustacean or insect. The Museo Nacional has a double vessel in this pattern from Venado Beach and a third was recovered in situ with an open extended burial in Upper Madden Lake. A miniature candelabra is shown in plate 7, f, with further ornate brown ware effigies depicting an alligator, bird, and turtles. Another candelabra type object with three symmetrical radial arms bearing recurved bowls and a central smaller bowl (8.5 cm. radial arm length) is shown in plate 8, a. It is decorated all over with an incised and punched geometric design and has a flat-bottomed rattle base. This object was found in situ in plain burial urn No. 1, held in the upraised right hand of an adult male skeleton. The bowl which was lowermost was pulverized and is shown reconstructed in the photo- eraph. The object evidently had been broken and repaired in ancient times. The base was fractured cleanly and fitted together with a white substance which had the gummy consistency of contact glue when first removed from the damp earth, but which became quite hard and brittle after 2 weeks’ exposure to the open air. There was no trace of the substance around the find and it is highly unlikely that it could have filtered into an in situ crack. Small vessels resembling candlesticks are shown in figure 3, a. They have a hollow annular base and incised or punched designs (3.5 and 4 cm. high). Plate 7, f, illustrates one of a series of miniature anthropomorphic bottles with covers in the so-called ‘‘poison-pot”’ class. These are of finely surfaced incised brown ware and have holes drilled in both the bottle and cover for the attachment of lids. The bottles hold about 1 fluid ounce, and though no traces of material have been identified from the interior they are thought to have been used for arrow poisons or some type of ritual substance. Some have an extra set of holes for suspension. They are known from this area and from Sitio Conte. A lid from a similar bottle of larger size is shown in plate 8, d. PT? = PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 21 Ficure 3.—Incised brown ware. Plate 8, b, illustrates a somewhat different effigy, not of brown ware but of a red-orange slipped red ware similar to that discussed under the consideration of decorated sherds below. This is a four-legged efigy bowl, 11.5 cm. high. It is a grotesque animal of compound type, possibly a jaguar with “spots” of reed punched design. Also notable is the indication of five toes on each foot and prominent (pectoral?) musculature. Realism is confused by the broken rem- nant of a “horn” immediately above the nose. Figure 4 shows several other vessels of the various shapes and design patterns that occur. Incised chalices or pedestal bowls are 22 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 - | Ficure 4.—Incised brown ware pedestal cups. also present in larger versions, as depicted by plate 8, c (14 cm. high). Sherds from similar vessels, having diameters ranging from 12-14 cm., are shown in figure 3,c,d. Plate 8, c, illustrates an exceptionally fine incised sherd from a chalice-shaped vessel which would have a diameter of 16 cm. with 7 cm. outsloping side walls. The rim elabora- tion is similar to that found on sherds among the scattered debris at Sitio Conte (Lothrop, 1942, fig. 345). STONEWORK There is a general paucity of stonework in Panam4 Viejo. Only 27 such pieces, including a large celt from a private collection, were recovered during the course of the study. The objects were distrib- uted throughout the site, isolated and without context, either on Anthzon, Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 23 the surface or immediate subsurface. Many of the points were found exposed on the surface after heavy rains. A single exception was a small polished celt found within a pottery vessel to be described later. POINTS Fourteen points were recovered of which typical examples are illustrated in figure 5, a-f. Most are made crudely of medium yellowish brown jasper, but several are of a rather poor grade of brown to red-brown agate. They consist of a highly irregular flake with a few simple secondary flakes struck off to form a tang, or even a tip. Ficure 5.—Flaked stone weapon points. 24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull 191 There is no secondary working of the blade edges. Some examples (fig. 5, a-f) have a well-delineated tang on a short blade giving them the appearance of a broadhead arrow point which might be mistaken for the typical drill of this region were it not for the irregular bends of the tang. Cores were sought but not found. ‘These points are identi- cal to those described by Lothrop from Sitio Conte and also represent the typical blades found at Venado Beach and in the Madden Lake area. Unlike specimens from the latter, however, none were found of the petrified wood which represents such a common source of material at the lake, but which is relatively rare at Panama Viejo. Figure 5, g, is an unusual point composed of white translucent chal- cedony with a slight yellowish tinge. It is triangular in cross section and in profile, giving it an awkward, heavy appearance. The thick- ness at the base is almost half the length of the entire point so that it could not have been hafted very successfully. The under surface has the usual irregular planes which suggest a flake struck from a core. There is no secondary reworking except for the tang. As in the Coclé area, there is no evidence that any of these points were hafted to arrows, nor does their ungainly appearance suggest this. It is more likely that they were used as points for small throwing spears or used with wooden ‘‘throwing sticks’’ of which no archeologi- cal evidence remains. SCRAPERS Only three objects were recovered which could be considered as scrapers. Figure 5, h, shows a small, blunt object made of jasper, similar in all respects to the points described above except that it has no tang and the working end is rounded by secondary flaking. It may represent a reworked point. The object shown in figure 5, 2, is so dissimilar to the remainder of the stonework that its origin may be seriously questioned. After rains it was found on the surface within the central portion of the burial area and without any adjacent urn fragments, which would indicate it was not an offering. It is composed of a dense medium-gray and slightly glossy agate type of material which exhibits well-delineated conchoidal fractures. It is of a not unusual pear shape, but is unique for this area in that its entire outline has been reworked by secondary parallel pressure flaking of medium-sized strokes, to give it a sharp symmetrical edge in contrast to the usual crude techniques. There is no evidence of either use or hafting, but the general shape and very sharp point suggest a double-faced woodworking adz. Plate 9, a’, illustrates a large scraper of mottled orange-brown agate. The edge was reworked with secondary chipping and the entire piece is smoothly worn down from use. This piece is so nearly Anthrop., Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 25 identical to those in my collection from the Hopewell North American Indian site at Wakenda, Mo., that a photograph of the latter has been included (pl. 9, a). This is distinguishable from the former only in that it is composed of a very fine grade of light tan chert common to Missouri. At the Hopewell site such objects are typical of the culture and are believed to have been held with the flattened edge in the palm and used as deer and buffalo hide scrapers. Many of the celts common to Panama are found in patterns and, in many instances, materials identical to those found. throughout the midwestern United States. CELTS Ten celts were recovered from the site, and an additional specimen was located in a private collection. They are all composed of various grades of basaltic rhyolite, but differ greatly in shape and will be described separately. Figure 6, b, shows a pear-shaped celt which has been broken off at one corner. It is crudely polished at the distal end with a smooth wedge-shaped blade, and a proximal end of rounded cross section has been left rough. The specimen in the private collection is identical to the above except for its larger size of an overall 8 inches. These celts represent the most common type reported from Sitio Conte, and Lothrop considers the incurved sides as representative of that culture. A common variant of this type (unillustrated) has straight sides and a somewhat broader proximal end. Like the others, it is polished only in the lower half. All are composed of a basalt having a beautiful even pattern of whitish inclusions giving a “‘salt-and-pepper” appear- ance. The object in figure 6, a, is apparently the proximal end of an oval celt of a basaltic syenite, smooth but unpolished evenly throughout, and perfectly symmetrical on both longitudinal axes. Lacking the distal blade end, it is possible that this is an unused mealing stone or similar object. In figure 7, a, 6, are shown medium-sized celts of gray rhyolite completely unlike the others and unreported from Panama. They are blunt and only roughly shaped out like the earliest hand axes of the European Paleolithic. It has been suggested to me that these are prepared blanks which awaited further finishing. Since little is known of the exact stages through which these celts were prepared, no definite hypothesis can be given. It is known, however, that the very earliest and the very latest Stone Age cultures produced similar celts: the earliest when grinding techniques were not developed, and the latest when availability of metals made the refinements of technique no longer worth the amount of labor involved. On the other hand, it 26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Ficure 6.—Stone celts. presumably is possible that they are artificial inclusions from some preceramic culture in the region. At any rate, definite statements will have to wait the development of further information on Pana- manian stonework. Anthrop. Pap. in "No. 68] PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 27 Ficure 7.—Stone celts. Figure 6, e, represented in the collection by two examples, shows a more or less standard wedge-shaped celt, polished in the lower three- fourths. The celt in figure 6, d, is composed of a somewhat more loosely textured basalt and has vertical edge faces so that only the distal end is a cutting edge and the successive cross sections are progressively larger rectangles which have very slightly bowed sides. It has a diagonal cutting edge like some of those also found at Sitio Conte, and is smoothly polished throughout. The remaining two celts, of which one is illustrated (fig. 6, c), are small, dense, dark black basaltic material, wedge-shaped and given a high polish throughout. The cutting edges are quite sharp and with- out evidence of use. One of these was found inside a small pottery vessel described under ‘‘Ceramics’”’ (pl. 10, 6). 682—611—64—_5 28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 METATES A single metate and its mano were found in the Museo Nacional collection (pl. 9, 6). This is a three-legged type, not uncommon farther to the west. It is of a coarse badly weathered tufa, and the legs have been partly broken. It should be noted that in the Madden Lake area simple oval metates are common. They are usually without legs and consist of a shallow depression worn in the naturally shaped irregular rock without secondary reworking. None were present at this site. It may be remarked again that there is a general paucity of stone- work at Panam4 Viejo in comparison to similar sites in this region. There were no chisels, drills, smoothers, polishing stones, or arrow- shaft straighteners present as at Sitio Conte or Venado Beach, and no carved stone objects are known to have been found. There were many smooth waterworn stones distributed throughout, one weighing approximately 10 pounds and roughly mano-shaped, but they in no way differed from those found randomly in the creekbed nearby. CERAMICS NATURE OF THE SAMPLE Because of the deranged nature of the site it was felt that accurate sherd counts would not yield sufficient valid information to compen- sate for the inordinate amount of time involved. In fact, a brief testing of this method indicated it might yield completely false in- formation unless the entire site was excavated down to sterile soil. In places where the earth grader removed high spots and turned around to make a new pass, there might be hundreds of burial urn parts, while in the furrows a few feet away there would be scarcely any. Similarly, it was evident that no stratigraphic analysis was possible. Accordingly, only those sherds having decoration were collected from the surface, the immediate subsurface during the investigation of burials, and several random pits about the periphery of the site. In the burial area, almost all the sherds were from large urns but with a slight admixture of both decorated and undecorated portions of smaller vessels. Presumably they were from both burial offerings and general debris. In the residence area there were many more sherds from smaller vessels. The sherds in both areas, exclusive of burial urns, were predominantly (50:1) undecorated red ware. Those that were decorated in no way differed from their counter- parts in the other areas. Several 2-foot squares were dug to a depth of 3 feet around the periphery of the site in order to get an idea of its extent. They are indicated in the site diagram (map 2). In Anthrop.,Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 29 general, sherds from these pits were very sparse, often less than five in each hole, so they were added to the general pool. The pooled sample consisted of 450 decorated sherds of which 339 were body sherds, 32 were rim pieces, and 79 were miscellaneous painted sherds. These will be analyzed in detail during the dis- cussion of their respective pottery types. SIZE AND SHAPE OF VESSELS Only one vessel was recovered complete, though it was severely broken by earth pressure. The restored piece is a very large, round- bottom, squat pot measuring 40 cm. in diameter. It is discussed in detail below. Several of the larger sherds would seem to belong to a vessel of approximately the same size. Modern day undecorated examples can be seen in almost every hut in the mountains throughout Panama, where they are used for water and grain storage or to prepare the alcoholic ‘“‘chicha.’”’ Of the smaller sherd pieces, the majority have so little curvature that they must certainly have come from at least moderate-sized vessels of unknown shape; the contours are shown with the sherd figures. The size is also attested to by identifiable portions of incised effigies which must have occupied an area at least the size of our intact example. It would be very interesting to know the range of shapes and uses of these pottery types and why they alone were given the distinctive stylistic treatment not found on smaller vessels. RED WARE The general, and presumably utilitarian, pottery is a plain, un- decorated, hard, dense vessel of medium red-brown color. It is tempered with fine grit often bearing minute siliceous deposits. The slip varies from red-brown to a decidedly red-orange color and is easily washed off in water. Refiring of sherds in excess oxygen at 500° C. for 30 minutes causes no color change, indicating a state of full oxidation. The most common shapes are the small globular “beanpot” with a rounded bottom, a larger and more stable wide-mouthed bowl, and a rather thick and heavy plate of very shallow form. ‘There is a simple recurved rim without secondary elaboration or decoration so that cross sections are of uniform width. Thickness averages about 0.6 cm. Typical shapes are shown in figures 8, a-—f, and 9, a, b. Surface finish varies from a smooth to a rather roughened appear- ance with undiagnostic tooling marks on both the interior and ex- terior. These at least indicate the use of some type of stone or wood object or, in some instances, corncobs to smooth the vessel surfaces before drying. Firing is often uneven with isolated black smudges 30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 OTT ¥ we LLM Uy Wf Sore: Ficure 8.—Red ware. on surface areas. Many of the vessels show charring on the rim or interior, indicating their contact with fire while in use. Most of the intact examples illustrated were recovered from the burial area, and several from inside urns. These in no way differed, however, from the thousands of fragmentary samples found throughout the site. Red- ware vessels were obtained both in average utility sizes of 1-2 quart capacity and in miniature sizes identical in shape but having a capac- ity of from 2—4 ounces. Anthrop.,7@P. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 31 Ficure 9.—Red ware. Several vessels with unusual shapes for the area were recovered. They all were present, though infrequent, at Sitio Conte. Plate 10, a (left), shows a broken-rimmed gourd effigy vessel or fluted bowl of a somewhat finer paste and smoother finish than is usual. At Sitio Conte they occurred in both red and in smoked wares (Lothrop, an BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 1942; figs. 266, 271) and were considered to be primarily a late char- acteristic. ‘They have also been found at Cupica, Colombia (Linné, 1929; fig. 53). Plate 10, a (right), shows a spouted vessel somewhat cruder than those from Coclé. Another vessel, of coarse brown un- slipped clay, is shown in figure 9, c. This bottom-spouted vessel also was represented in Coclé by a single identical vessel (Lothrop, 1942; fig. 337, a). It resembles many of the classic “baby feeders” of Europe. A red ware pedestal plate, or frutera, 22 cm. in diameter, is shown in figure 8, d. Plate 10, 6, shows asmall red ware beanpot with several rows of appliqued nubbins. It was found in juxtaposition to burial No. 5 in the shell lens and contained a small, polished, wedge- shaped celt, described under ‘Stonework.’ This type of pot has been described from Veraguas (Lothrop, 1950; fig. 62). A rather mas- sive red ware tripod, differing from the usual variety in the outcurving position of the legs, is illustrated in plate 10, c. One small dish (fig. 9, d) had a neatly drilled center hole which was filled with a plug of unbaked, buff clay. The rough base of this piece suggested that some form of pedestal had been attached. BROWN WARE The characteristic pottery type of this site is a brown ware with decoration applied by a variety of combinations of incising, mechanical punching, and appliqued or modeled relief. The group includes several related types which employ more or less the same techniques but vary widely in color and, to a lesser extent, in the physical char- acteristics of the paste mixture. The color is most commonly a medium brown or red brown (5/4 and 4/4 Munsell scale), but a con- siderable portion of the sample runs toward a redder tone (5/6) or to darker browns and lighter red-free browns (4/2 and 6/3). Presumably this is a characteristic of the particular paste on hand at the moment, and the firing temperature, rather than of distinctive pottery types. Sherds of each major color variation were broken in half and one por- tion was refired in excess oxygen at 500° C. for 30 minutes. The changes of color are as follows: Munsell color Refired color. Red 2.5 YR: 4/6 Red 2.5 YR: 4/8 Reddish brown 5.0 YR: 4/4 Red 2.5 YR: 4/8 Dark reddish brown 5.0 YR: 3/3 Yellowish red 5.0 YR: 4/6 Similarly, there is variation in the surface texture. Most of the material is a fine-textured, fine-grit tempered paste which was smoothed on the surface to a moderate polish, leaving no surface pits visible to the naked eye and impervious to water. A substantial number of sherds, however, have a more open grainy surface texture which appears to be of the same paste material left unpolished. Anthrop..PaP- PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 33 None of the brown wares are covered with slip. There does not appear to be enough evidence to break this ware down into subgroups on the basis of consistent variations. PAINTED WARES Black and white on red ware.—Fifty-six isolated sherds were re- covered which fall into a group of black, white, and red simple geo- metric designs in various color combinations. For the most part these consist of rim pieces with concentric bands of white and black on the edge of ared ground (pl. 11, a; fig. 10,6). The bands may be from less than 1 cm. to more than 6 cm. in width and may be single or multi- ple. This ware is probably related directly to the paneled urn covers. Several variants were found. Four sherds were from white vessels bearing alternating red and black bands, the reverse color sequence of the above (fig. 10, e). Another four sherds (fig. 10, a, h) were of red ware which was decorated with concentric black bands only; no white was present. ‘Three sherds are present from the near center of plates or shallow bowls having a white panel with black geometric designs (fig. 10, c, i, k). Some or all of the rims may belong to this style, but unfortunately none of sufficient extent were recovered to justify this conclusion. The ceramic paste in both these and the rim sherds is identical to that of the usual red ware. The red paint appears to have been applied first as a slip, somewhat heavier than on the simple vessels. Whites range from a pure white to a cream white and appear to be the most labile. All of the sherds in this group appear to be related and, by the num- ber of them recovered, represent a possible “‘type’”’ painted ware of this culture. Not enough sherds of the variants are present to warrant classification at this time. None are true polychromes, since the design proper utilizes only two colors superimposed on a self-color background. As such, they are related to the paneled red ware of Coclé and presumably represent cultural acquisition earlier than true polychromes. Red on brown.—Two sherds were recovered of the same brown ware present throughout the site, but having a narrow red band. Both of these are rim sherds (pl. 11,d). Their place in the pottery classification is unknown. RIMSHERDS The 32 rimsherds recovered can be divided conveniently into three groups on the basis of profiles (fig. 11). The first group (a-l) shows a slight inward curve. Shapes are those of plates and shallow bowls. All except one are slipped red ware and all have some manner of plastic decoration. 34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 == lamar Kael beams Mara 2 hye ct RED WHITE BLACK PURPLE ORANGE Ficure 10.—Painted wares. Group two (m—u) has vertical rims and the vessel sides may slope outward to an inflection point before recurving inward. The shapes are narrow, and wide-mouthed, globular vessels of medium size. Only two are slipped; the remainder are incised brown ware. All have more elaborate designs than the former group. Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 35 Ficure 11.—Rim profiles. Group three (v—z’) consists of severely recurved rimsherds, some- times flattened along the inner edge. They are of slipped red ware and either not decorated or decorated by simple shell stamping along the edges. They represent conventional wide-mouthed globular pots. DECORATIVE TECHNIQUES DESIGN MOTIFS Segments of serpents and lizards are the most common design motifs of the brown wares. From the sherd material, it is impossible in most cases to distinguish between the two. A serpent from a large burial urn is illustrated in plate 3 and figure 2._ This particular 36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 serpent appears to be a variety of sea creature; the illusion is created mainly by the long curling “antennae.” No truly representative creatures are known in Panama or its waters, but one is reminded of the common yellow-bellied sea snake (Polamis platuria) which may have been elevated by prehistoric imagination to the level of some superstitious significance. Several sherds would appear to be of the same pattern. A very realistically executed lizard or iguana is illustrated in plate 12 and figure 12, representing the finest example of incised relief ware from the site. The backward-facing position of the head appears rather unusual for Panama and gives the whole design an appearance reminiscent of Quetzalcoatl motifs in Mexico such as that on the facades of Xochicalco. This is also frequently the position in which Chinese dragons are portrayed. Lothrop (1942; figs. 43-44) illus- trates a bird in this position from a painted Coclé plate, but there does not seem to be any relation between the above and the serpent or lizard motifs from Sitio Conte or Veraguas. The collection also includes fragments of other similar designs, all of which are approxi- mately the same size. A nearly complete parrot was found (pl. 13, a), which, judging by its curvature and thickness (10 mm.), originally formed a portion of a very large urn. This is an example of the modeled-relief technique in which the body is formed by pushing the clay outward from the inside of the vessel so that the actual wall thickness remains un- changed. Again, one is reminded more of Mexican motifs than of the polychrome phases of Panama. A similarly formed monkey urn was discussed earlier. Ficure 12.—Detail of lizard effigy jar. Anthrop.,Fap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 37 A water bird is shown in plate 13, b, in a much cruder, but accurate, simple linear incising. It probably represents the white heron which may be seen on the beach next to the site and is common through the Panama Gulf region. Other animal motifs are present in the ceremonial ware mentioned in connection with burials. These are the turtle, alligator, and monkey, and humanoid three-dimensional figures. Several portions of such figures are present in the collection. LOCATION From the few restorable vessels it appears that the biological mo- tifs usually were placed separately on opposing sides of the vessel. In all cases the same pattern was present on both sides of the upper half to one-third of the vessel. On some, the jar was divided into four vertical panels by appliqued ridges into four alternating blank and decorated vertical panels similar to the sections of an orange. On the other hand, pots with geometrical designs appear to be filled across the entire visible outer surface leaving only the bottom and interior undecorated. The rims were further elaborated on the top or either side, but the rim and body decorations are not contiguous. There is no evidence of any zoning of decorative fields. ANTHROPOMORPHIC EFFIGIES Four polychrome vessels were found which have humanoid fea- tures. They are basically similar and have in common the ridging to indicate hair style and the painted “mask.’”’ Beyond these fea- tures, however, they are quite dissimilar in ceramic type, paint quality and color, and in stylistic execution. They do not appear to be the product of a single artist, nor to have the unity of similar vessels to the west. Plate 15, 6, is unquestionably a typical “Coclé-type” humpback effigy in coarse slipped red ware with white panels to indicate face and arms. The face is elaborated by a purple mask and the arms and breastplate are decorated with geometric black lines in the typi- cal Sitio Conte manner, but they were too poorly preserved to photo- graph well. The protruding mouth and nose as a single unit makes it resemble a monkey more than a human; an interesting combina- tion when combined with the humpback. There are small raised breasts and no evidence of masculine structure. In plate 21, 6, is shown a miniature vessel in which the body is barrel-shaped without arms. This is a better grade of slipped, polished red ware with a soft white slip over most of the body. The decorations in red and the mask in purple are edged with black material 38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 and all are applied over the white. In paint, this resembles the Coclé specimens, but the style is different. Figure 13 is a very fine vessel from the Museo Nacional collection. It is a red ware vessel with elaborate panels which relate it more to Ficure 13.—Polychrome effigy jar (Museo Nacional). Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 39 the Azuero Peninsula than to Coclé. Both modeled hands are placed to the mouth. The head is white slipped with a ridge to indicate the hairline and a high conical hat decorated with alternating red and purple stripes. There are six symmetrical body panels, redrawn flat in the illustration. The front panel (a’) is repeated on the back and consists of scrolls in black on the natural background. The inner portions of the scrolls end in stylized “alligator god” heads. The side panels (a’’) are placed over a white background and consist of elaborate convolutions ending in alligator god heads and having fillers of small red and purple wedges. The vessel shown in figure 14 is made of a finer buff paste, com- pletely slipped with a hard, polished cream-white surface. It is Figure 14.—Polychrome effigy jar. 40 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 decorated in black, except for the red shadows under the eyes. The manner of hair indication is similar to that above and the feet are like those on many Veraguas buff ware effigies. The style, however, seems completely unrelated to any Panama pottery published here- tofore and seems more lifelike than the usual humanoid effigies, INCISING The main design technique consists of incising with the thumbnail or a pointed tool in a linear fashion to form various animal drawings. These are then elaborated with incising or punching by various mechanical tools so as to fill in the design or further elaborate the body outlines. Punched holes, shell marks, thumbnail marks, and various combinations of markings made by a hollow reed have been identified. The reed marks are in patterns of full circles, concentric circles, circles with central dots, and half circles. Many designs are executed with a mixture of several techniques. The frequency of appearance of single and mixed designs is as given below and as illus- trated by selected examples in plates 16-18: Number of pooled decorated sherds_____.--_____---_-_---- 339 Number incised oe ee Se 328 Linear . sisters sce, V8 Pea Sse Se i es 185 Punched ..§. Pe Sei eee ee a eee eee 67 Shell... 3 2.88. 3 28} Bh OYE RS ee 38 Reed... 3. Vee ER ee BL Sek BES 13 Circle-dot\ 3. 3:2: -423_ 3.3.8.3. % £05. Be 12 Concentric Giréles’"-} 2 ere ie Pee as 10 Half circles S20... Foci BL Be 19 Fingernail) 2. Sas Seat Res Beene Ne a 5 Raised ridges along incised lines are present in some examples, but most designs are clean and would indicate incising the “leather- hard” rather than in wet clay, causing uneven grooves due to subse- quent polishing. SURFACE DESIGNS Surface designs are shown in plates 19-20. Of the out-sloping plates and shallow bowls, the most frequent rims are those with molded ridges and/or one or more concentric incised rings. The ridge may be above the ring, below it (pl. 19, a), or both above and below (pl. 19, e). In some examples either the edge or the ridged edge was scalloped (pl. 19, 6, d). Other designs are simple shell stamping (pl. 20, 7) and punching or notching of the rim (pl. 20, d). They are apparently notched in the leather-hard state. Of the vertical, and chiefly brown-ware rims, designs consist of geometrical patterns of alternating incised lines and punched dots (pl. 20, a-c). In contrast to the former group, incising appears to Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 41 have been done in the damp state, leaving a well-defined ridge which can be seen in the photographs. The patterns occur all over the external surface exclusive of the bottom and do not appear to be organized in zones. Some designs are more elaborate incised circles and swirls (pl. 19, g), like those on the votive ware. On others, an applique ridge is diagonally incised in imitation of rope, or has crude ridging and edge notching. RELIEF MODELING AND APPLIQUE Other plastic decorative techniques frequently employed are relief modeling and applique. It is the former which really gives this pottery its completely distinctive appearance and one cannot but be impressed at the high degree of refinement in this technique. Oc- casionally the entire animal body is raised above the vessel surface, outlined with deep linear incising, and paneled with reed or shell markings. In the thick, heavy sherds the modeling often is pressed outward from the inner surface; in smaller sherds the inner surface is smooth and flush. Relief is used also for heads alone, or portions of heads such as jaws and the beaks of birds. Applique is used in much the same manner where a sharper raised edge is required; most fre- quently in the application of eyes. The term “Modeled Relief Brown Ware’ has been applied locally to this type of pottery found on the Venado Beach site, a term believed to have originated with Dr. Lothrop during his excavations there. The frequencies of these decorative techniques are as follows: Anpligued! rm, 25 ie gmat noel fae sett ls 8 wih 19 LE) pT lade hl ranks BE ee ail Mf Bera te Pape bea 3 Appliqued aiid incised. 1__Jsyscu O24 - SUL LeL 2 US 124 Modeled and incised: d se d4 osnspe-e bel eb ebeebe- oe 35 Total plastic decorations....-.2--.---.+----+-.- 170 TRADE WARE Seventy-six sherds were found having decorations in two or more colors. Of these, 20 were true polychromes in red, white, black, purple or, more rarely, orange. Several represent portions of typical Veraguas-Coclé types both in designs and materials. Most appear to be segments of fruteras and plates with serpent and similar motifs, including the “coral snake rim” (fig. 10, d, f,g). Similarly, a portion of a frutera pedestal was found. One sherd has a raised ‘nubbin” with four supports (fig. 10, 7) decorated in red and black on a highly polished buff ware of foreign import. This represents a type ware of Parita and related sites on the Azuero Peninsula. A sequence of progressive stylizations are known whereby this is shown to be a frog effigy (Biese, 1961). This definitely is not a locally manufactured 42 BUREAU OF AMERICAN’ ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 piece and is known to occur as trade ware in both Coclé and Veraguas. A complete widemouthed vessel (pl. 15, a@) and nine sherds are of red designs on a white ground, identical to the Coclé redline ware. In the absence of further material from the site, these pieces are all considered to be trade ware brought in from the more westerly prov- inces. Unfortunately, the lack of correlated finds in graves or in context with incised wares makes it impossible to establish them as contemporaneous with the other artifacts. It is of significance, how- ever, that the redline ware is considered to be definitely a late char- acteristic of Sitio Conte in Coclé. Several of the red ware vessels merit individual discussion. In plate 21, b, are shown two red ware vessels, a small dish and a spouted vessel, both with white panels bearing black scrolls. While similar to Coclé vessels, at least to me they appear to be imitations or copies of the same; an impression perhaps only gained by handling the two side by side. They are cruder, heavier, and slightly different in surface texture than the usual Sitio Conte ware and may be of local manufacture. Plate 21, a, also shows a widemouthed pot and a rather massive, dense polychrome pedestal enclosing rattles. Both of these have a coarse, medium buff ground color with designs in red and purple edged in black. In style and finish they do not resemble previously reported Panama polychromes. SECONDARY USE OF ARTIFACTS Sufficient direct evidence for the repair and re-use of damaged vessels often is lacking. However, the ordinary rim chipping of vessels in use, which was later smoothed by grinding, is seen frequently. When evidence of major repairs is found, it is an occurrence worth detailed notice. When a vessel is used for burial it may be taken as some evidence of a frugal or materially poor culture or, conversely, one lacking a highly formalized burial tradition. This is in marked contrast to many cultures in which the grave furniture is new and constructed specifically for the purpose. The lizard motif incised relief vessel shown in plate 12, a, was originally recovered as burial No. 7, where it was found within a conventional undecorated urn. This round-bottomed vessel is 40 cm. in maximum diameter by 30 cm. in maximum height, with its inflection point located at five-eighths of the latter. It is of a medium red-brown paste with a smooth unpolished surface. There was a portion of an incompletely oxidized brown to dark-green identical vessel used as a cover. The ridges, which divide the vessel into four panels, and the crest of the lizard exactly match up with the cover Anthrop., Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 43 design with a 5-10 cm. overlap all the way around. This vessel top has a shallow flat shoulder ending in a throat only 15 cm. in diameter around which there is evidence of a vertical rim having been present at one time. The bottom has a 19 cm. curving fracture with 7 smooth holes drilled along the edges. This was obviously for the placement of ties for mending by the “‘crack-lace’’ method previously unreported from Panama. As mentioned above, the jar contained a 20-cm. plate and an infant burial. It appears that a utility grain- or water- storage jar, with a not uncommon design, developed a crack and was repaired. The vessel mouth was then widened so that the plate and burial (or secondary burial) could be placed in it and covered with the broken top of a similar vessel. Linné (1929) summarizes the distri- bution of the technique and concludes it is primarily of western South American origin with singular exceptions in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. It is completely unknown from Mexico and Guatemala. SPINDLE WHORLS The 15 spindle whorls from the site (pl. 22) were treated separately in a recent publication, to which one should refer for more detailed information (Biese, 1961). All of the whorls were found exposed on the surface after heavy rains, and were distributed sporadically and without context in both residence and burial areas. They are all made of the same red-brown to brown clays and tempering tech- niques used for the general ceramic remains. The surface treatments fall into two distinct groups: the coarse orange-to-red-to-brown slip of Panamé Viejo red ware, and the unslipped, smooth brown wares. One whorl (No. 3) was a partially smudged tan of coarse clay. By physical characteristics, the whorls fell into three groups: Simple——Nos. 10-11 are simple flattened balls of slipped clay bearing a center core and representing the simplest type of spindle weight. No. 12 adds the further refinement of a secondary smaller mass atop the first. In Nos. 1-2 this mass is more distinctive. Mammiform.—Nos. 5, 7, and 9 have a more pronounced upper mass of clay. They also differ from the preceding by being composed of a smoothly polished dark-brown clay. Incised.—The remainder of the whorls are all similar in that they are decorated with radial incising or punctate designs. In the publication cited above (Biese, 1961) it was pointed out that the weights and diameters of these whorls placed them in two groups such that the rough approximation of their inertia gave a sevenfold difference. It was suggested that this was evidence for a more ad- vanced weaving technology in which either two different fibers were spun or two different weights of fibers were made for different purposes. 682-611—64_—6 44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 MISCELLANEOUS CERAMIC OBJECTS A number of miscellaneous clay objects were recovered from the site. Figure 15 shows two single note incised brown ware whistles, both probably representing alligators. The broken tail of another whistle, probably representing a bird, is illustrated in plate 23 with other miscellaneous objects found at the site. CLASSIFICATION There is an insufficient collection of material upon which to base a definitive classification scheme. ‘This is especially true when it is known that related pottery is present throughout the Venado Beach- Ficure 15.—Brown ware whistles. Anthrep., rap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 45 Madden Lake areas and its accumulation will necessitate revision of any system. Furthermore, we may well find that stratified deposits will presage a system of classification having temporal as well as geographical value in the determination of cultural parameters. Nevertheless, a summary of the ceramic collection presented herein may be given in the form of a preliminary classification. This is intended only to be descriptive of the various broad groups of pottery recovered and to be used as an aid for further comparisons; to divide it immediately from the equally broad cultures previously described from Panama. I. PanaMA ViEJo RED WARE II. Panamd ViEJo DEcorATED BROWN WARE 1. Incised brown ware. (Pl. 8, e.) Identical to those sherds of the same name from Sitio Conte. The paucity of examples would suggest it is neither native to, nor representative of, either of these areas. 2. Geometric brown ware. Including its red-brown variants. The de- sign is geometrical and incised with secondary elaboration by punching and mechanical stamping with shell and reed. 3. Biometric-relief brown ware. (With red-brown variants.) The de- signs are animal representations in bas-relief outlined by incising and elaborated by secondary stamping. This also would include the smaller designs in which the representation is not actually elevated from the vessel surface. III. PanamA ViEJo Buack ON WuitE PANELED RED WaRE IV. PanaMA VIEJO CEREMONIAL WARE Including those elaborate vessels with geometrical designs and/or three-dimensional modeled or appliqued sculptures (modeled- relief brown ware). V. PanaMA ViEJO URN WARES 1. Red urn ware, and the common red-brown covers 2. Relief urn ware 3. Black on white paneled red urn ware (covers only) 4. Red and black on white urn ware The remaining painted sherds are represented by only one example each and cannot be classified. ‘They are presented only for descrip- tive purposes. DISCUSSION GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION The most important material from this site, for the tracing of horizontal distribution, is the decorated brown ware. From _ the Pearl Islands, Linné (1929) illustrates a nubbin sherd (p. 99), incised animal feet (p. 81), and alligator and serpent designs in raised brown ware with similar techniques in reed marking, shell marking, punching, and incising (p. 90). 46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Raised brown ware sherds with animal designs are illustrated from Punta Patifio, near the Gulf of San Miguel, deep in the Darien (Linné, 1929, p. 154). It is possible that cultural influence extended as far south. With the single exception of Linné’s work we have no data from the Darien region of Panama. More tenuous identification exists in the case of his scalloped profile rim from Trigan4, Colombia (p. 33), which resembles our figure 8, d. Recent work in Cupica, Colombia (Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1961), has demonstrated identical fragments of our modeled-relief brown ware as well as Cocle humpback polychrome effigies and other trade ware from the Late period at Sitio Conte. This gives us a known, active distribution area of over 250 miles to the southeast, into the Darien jungle via land. This country is considered to be almost inaccessible today even with our most modern equipment. The obvious route is the sea passage via the Pearl Islands (which have similar pottery types mentioned above), a considerably shorter distance. The inter- mediate vessel shown by Reichel-Dolmatoff (1961, fig. xiii, 3-4) also more closely links the modeled-relief brown ware of the present site with that of the Santarem in Brazil as described by Palmatary (1939). Across the Isthmus of Panama, the brown ware type pottery is well known among local archeologists from Venado Beach; several typical sherds and stone points are shown in plate 24. Similarly, the same pottery is found across most of the Madden Lake region in a broad zone up to 15 miles east of the Canal. Plate 25 shows typical surface finds selected from several dozen sites exposed during the dry season when the Lake drops. Plate 25, a, is an otherwise typical point recovered unassociated from the Fort San Lorenzo area near Col6n. These illustrated artifacts were selected from hundreds because of their similarity to others presented herein. From the distribution of similar pottery, points, and burials, related cultures are seen to have occupied a wide band across the entire Isthmus from the Atlantic to the Pacific, covering, and slightly to the east of, the area occupied by the present day Canal Zone. It extends out to the Pearl Islands in the south and into an as yet undetermined area of the Darien. This distribution is reflected in map 3. CONTACTS AND MIGRATIONS Cultural contact definitely is shown with the westerly provinces, primarily Coclé, through the admixture of polychrome vessels and sherds. Unfortunately, these sherds are not stratified, and range from periods which are considered to be characteristic of both early and late Sitio Conte. Identifying goldwork and whole vessels were re- covered from Venado Beach but have been published only in pre- liminary form (Lothrop, 1956). Recent work has suggested Coclé Anthrop. Pap. No. 68] PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 2 wae .v re) C 4 ‘a d \ Ce: ee Coclé "Pacific Ocean 47 Map 3.—Distribution of Panama Viejo cultural traits. 48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 polychrome might be much more widely distributed than was originally thought. It is present in other foci, rather than being restricted to trade ware, throughout a portion of the Azuero Peninsula and adjacent southeastern Veraguas. Until further details are avail- able, we can only state with certainty that the Panam4 Viejo culture had limited trade contacts with her classical polychrome neighbors to the west. There is no evidence to suggest contact with the more westerly Chiriqui or Costa Rica. Contacts to the east are suggested by the distribution of pottery to Darien, if not actual settlements of related cultures. Further explora- tion of the Darien will be necessary before we are enlightened on this point. In contrast to actual contacts, the presence of shell marking and incised spindle whorls tends to suggest a combination of vertical and horizontal transmission of traits somewhere in the as yet remote past of Central American migrations. Parallel shell edge stamping around the vessel rims is known in Panama from the Girén site in Azuero (Willey and Stoddard, 1954), where it was found in the possibly con- temporaneous levels of the Santa Maria Phase, and from both the Santa Maria and early Coclé levels at Sitio Conte (Ladd, 1957). Shell stamping is also known from the Sarigua Phase at the Gulf of Parita (Willey and McGimsey, 1954), though in this case the pottery paste is quite different and there is a considerable time lag between the estimated dates of Sarigua and Coclé. Shell stamping is a widely distributed trait throughout Central America. There are present two other traits of possible vertical significance, i.e., urn burial and crack-lace pottery mending, which may represent evidence of either direct migrations or counter migrations with South America at some time in the history of this culture’s predecessors. These have been discussed more fully above, and we are now beginning to believe urn burial may represent a direct migration of much more ancient origin and distribution throughout Mesoamerica than has been thought previously. The evidence offered by polychrome pottery traits is still more meager, but despite the difference in stylistic development one is often tempted to draw relationships between Mexico, Panama, and Peru. CHRONOLOGY In attempting to assign a date to the culture represented by this site we have two essential cultural links: polychrome trade ware and the Venado Beach site. Both of these have been subjected to recent reexamination, and some doubt exists. When originally described (Lothrop, 1942), the classic polychromes of Coclé were thought, on the basis of style, to be representative of a unique local focus with carta ls PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 49 wide trade contacts and of a relatively late date, i.e., ca. A.D. 1300- 1500. Later unpublished local work indicates the possibility of wider distribution and independent production in several areas of Central Panama. Stratigraphy at the Girén site and Sitio Conte would seem to indicate a greater time span for the entire complex of decorated brown ware and polychrome phases. Still more recently (Lothrop, 1958 and 1959) a Venado Beach urn burial has yielded a radiocarbon date of A.D. 227 +60 (Yale—125) which was cross-dated with early Coclé polychromes. Dr. Lothrop has suggested that this is too early and may represent a sampling or technical error; the reader is referred to the above-cited two papers for a thorough discussion of these and other dates from Panama. In 1961 he announced a new Venado Beach radiocarbon determination of 1000 years B.P. (Groningen No. 2200) from material found in similar circumstances (i.e., charcoal from within plain red ware burial urns). Once a date is accepted, we still have to decide the relationship of this site to Venado Beach and the Lake area. On the basis of trade wares present, Panam4 Viejo has very little, the Madden area almost none, and Venado Beach a rather high proportion. Similarly, the absence of both jewelry and trade ware points to an economically poor or dependent tribe associated contemporaneously with Venado Beach when the latter was the ceremonial or ruling center. For at least a tentative assignment of relative dates in Panama I am inclined to accept the Venado Beach radiocarbon date with a slightly earlier date for Panama Viejo and a still earlier one (ca. 50-100 years) for Madden Lake. INTERPRETIVE SUMMARY A new Early Christian Era culture is described herein from Central Panama. It is composed of a rather widespread group of related tribes which shared common burial and ceramic traits, and were distributed over the Canal Zone, the Pearl Islands, and the adjacent territory to the east. The composite tribes perhaps are affiliated loosely through common ethnic origins and maintain Venado Beach as a “capital.”” Their characteristic economy was based largely on shellfish and offshore gathering and limited agriculture supplemented by small-animal hunting. Life appears to have been rather sedentary and peaceful with limited trade contacts and possibly irregular hazardous trips to the immediately adjacent east and west. Weaving was practiced. Pottery skills were developed to a high degree, but full classic polychromes are not indigenously present. Burial is moderately ritualistic with special classes of pottery, but not formal- ized to a high degree, and may occur in urns, open extended, or secondary fashion. Deep level graves are not present, but a suggestion 50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 of mutilation occurs. The complicated skills of jewelry and gold working, ceremonial stonework, and permanent structures are absent; this more from economic position than artistic development, since realistic clay sculpture is present. The identifying traits are: (1) urn burial; (2) incised relief brown ware with zoomorphic patterns; (3) certain red and brown ware combinations with shell, reed and punch markings; (4) elaborate ceremonial or votive ware; (5) incised spindle whorls; and (6) simple flake points without secondary elabora- tion except crude tang formation and ground and polished stone celts in a variety of patterns. BIBLIOGRAPHY ANDERSON, C. L. G. 1911. Old Panama and Castilla Del Oro. Washington, D.C. Bancrort, Husert H. 1882-87. History of Central America. (1501-1530.) 3vols. San Francisco. Brisseg, Lro P. 1960. Spindle whorls from Panama Viejo. Panama Archaeol., vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 35-46. Canal Zone. 1961. The frog effigy and large polychrome vessels from Parita. Panama Archaeol., vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 32-41. Canal Zone. CaRLEs, RuBEN D. 1960. Old Panama. La Estrella de Panama. Patrick J. Smythe, trans. Lapp, JOHN. 1957. A stratigraphic trench at Sitio Conte, Panama. Amer. Antiq., vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 265-271. Linn, SIGVALD. 1929. Darien in the past: The archaeology of Eastern Panama and North- western Columbia. Gdéteborgs Kungl., Vetenskaps-och vitterhets- samhalles handlinger, Femte Féljden, ser. A, band 1, No.3. Gothen- burg. LorHrop, SAMUEL K. 1937. Coclé, an archaeological study of Central Panama. 1. Mem. Pea- body Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 7. 1942. Coclé, an archaeological study of Central Panama. 2. Mem. Pea- body Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 8. 1950. Archaeology of southern Veraguas, Panama. Mem. Peabody Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 9, No. 3. 1954. Suicide, sacrifice and mutilations in burials at Venado Beach, Panama. Amer. Antiq., vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 226-234. 1956. Jewelry from the Panama Canal Zone. Archaeol., vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 34-40. 1958. The archaeological picture in southern Central America. Proc. 33d Int. Cong. Amer., tomo 1, pp. 165-172. San Jose. 1959. A reappraisal of isthmian archaeology. Mitteilungen Hamburg Mus. Volkerkunde, band 25. 1960. C 14 dates for Venado Beach, Canal Zone. Panama Archaeol., vol. 3, No. 1. Canal Zone. MunsE.u Cotor Co., Inc. 1954. Munsell soil color charts. Baltimore. Antrop.; 2 PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 51 PALMATARY, HELEN C. 1939. Tapajé pottery. Etnol. Stud., vol. 8, pp. 1-136. Gothenburg. REICHEL-DoLMATOFF, GERARDO, and REIcHEL-DoLMatorr, ALICIA. 1961. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia, vol. 10, pp. 239-332. Bogotd. SHAFROTH, JOHN F. 1953. Panama La Vieja; cincuentenario de La Republica. Imprenta Na- cional. Panama. SmirH, H. Morean. 1960. Diggers may find Pre-Spanish city. Jn Panama American, Sunday American Supplement, Jan. 24. Panama. Sosa, JuAN B. 1955. Panama La Vieja; con motive del cuarto centenario de su fundacion. 2d ed., Imprenta Nacional. Panama. VINTON, KENNETH W. 1951. A new archaeological site in Panama. Scien. Monthly, vol. 73, No. 2. WitueEy, Gorpon R., and McGimsgy, CHARLEs R. 1954. The Monagrillo culture of Panama. Pap. Peabody Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 49, No. 2. Witiey, Gorpon R., and Stopparp, THEODORE. 1954. Cultural stratigraphy in Panama: A preliminary report on the Girén site. Amer. Antiq., vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 332-343. 682-611—64—_7 . A ; y ins 7 ‘a oy ta of ~chpemonstiypetpd ; i ame pr | | eine YT bt = peer ec bs ‘sl an Tee wat) , ae ea a ‘BabA Ate) Pee onteRH) 43) wed stadangget ian b ; ; 1 bits Tasik AR Bk forepetigcts ¥ f ’ s 4 , cio Lil enu SUN is etiide: Rete whe a ib he hy Parse ty mthies lve Adina a0 ay f Fi ore). eT a a Mi arcing Te Lt Ole oe uclinete Se aie ’ 1 ey ¢ Vii 7), bain jdt ‘Vi ; j gb needs Ae eT eT beeen’, Jo ovale. Olt eaee ee BA ov Ul lov Aca. | Mae Eh ta i Mas) al rir = Lite rt el § sdirearrel pel vee: eras Hae AAG A OF, £3 toy pte wns a 1? iy ’ Le 7 Peer ‘17ft, or) s 4 , at rol " Ls a BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BUEEERIN 191 PEATE, 1 Sacrifice burial. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 2 Serpent burial urn. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 3 Serpent burial urn. BULLETIN 191 PLATE 4 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Mn | i d urn and panel from incised monkey urn. Painte BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 5 Votive ware double turtle-monkey effigy. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 6 Votive ware double bird effigy. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 7 Miscellaneous votive ware. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 8 Miscellaneous votive ware. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 9 Stone artifacts. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 10 Red ware vessels. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 11 Painted wares. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Lizard effigy vessel. BULLETIN 191 PLATE 12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Incised relief brown ware, BULLETIN 191 PLATE 13 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Incised relief brown ware. BULLETIN 191 PLATE 14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 15 Coclé-type red line ware and humpback effigy jar. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 16 Incised relief brown ware. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 17 Incised relief brown ware. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 18 Incised relief brown ware. Seles cag Senerttenec BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 19 Rim sherds. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 20 “? ‘ai . 4 ‘ a £ ? Rim sherds. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 21 Miscellaneous polychrome and paneled red ware. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 22 CM. Spindle whorls. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 23 Miscellaneous ceramic objects. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 24 Artifacts from Venado Beach site. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 25 Artifacts from Madden Lake site. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 69 THE LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO By IRVINE DAVIS 53 CONTENTS PAGE IEARES EK ee Se ee ee ee oe eee ae aE oe eerie et ee ae 57 PAINT OO iypey. 5. Beep. $3 woot 2 en seat ab mane =| Amie LIB h Mek) 2 a iS eee ee 59 Bilis blesstruGlune: a: 452.2 = eS pe RS a OR ee, et i 59 NWVORGUStrUCLUTCsE. Sac a= om Bey cree Ve eipceie Weeae ee) pel a Mee se eer es 64 SESSUNG W ERTT EY OT QUIS a te Py ge Pe et ey Seen 65 MOT pop ONeINICS = ate eae a ee ee Ae eae ee, eeenen eee we PES Wen eran 66 Wowellreductions) je hen sae Led. 3 eee Ee EE ee Se ee 66 Wiaille nen or ahie ae ee yn er ee deed ed eo be g he) Lah are aa aa 70 Mipcelanmeous| PrOGesses. 250525 245.3 2p Se eee De 72 lor puOlany = xe. ene cert, 2 a ee ate Mee Sees She beet Ae 73 Crear Sig oy Se NI Spa ek, PN J ea rey Se NG RL Re a Nie a 73 Wor diGlascegts ars a= a+ Sats at ubat leer mete ees, TE Le. El Seen ope eer eno ne ne 74 Werbssueuens fc Deel. NA ee Oe Ee Oe Pk 75 Verb finiflec tio mi aaeticrest st tpi dhe abe d Lae 2 sere ele eee eds. 2 ee Pas ak 75 Grammiaticalicatesories 2 2.0 22 2c ce 75 Iinilechional-ataxesls 2p he bet 2S papa en Le eee eee 78 IDistributionyOlvatixesee ta en eee oe ey ee 87 Werbtstemist= seri sc > Sen Ae ae be SE ee eer eee a ees ae 94 Stempformationetlers Lao. Fise sae? ee see eres a ee 94 Stem) variants: 24° tbat teens bis seen Spor kines ale Sia, 99 Verbrcore,deriviatlonast 42 Se ates ce ee ee ee 103 ViETD CLASSES Sawer OE Bec eS eg oe Rea Ly SRS fee os oS ee 105 FEransitiVenverps aes =e eee eae Se ts Fat his A wee eG Fon 105 Intransitive:verbs?ss=se phe he eee ee Tee ee tS 110 Werbalrausalianies ees 2 ame oi rete eet We A 114 Unimtiected!\ words i". AU 2k he rah ten NTI) Se ee oe eee 118 CLS (GS aa Ie a aN NE Bd PRON, ORE pe pa ANIA Neen abe pt ee i CRM SP oS 123 = fF] ES ea a gree dag S TOs Ok Np SS opie Pale eed ae de 124 Dehnition Of SyntachiGwmitss..2A2 020 2h ae ee ee ie ee 124 Majorftunction slotstand then, tillenss sss ea oe ee 125 ‘Predicaterel obese ee oe ee a eet Ns ene 126 Pex POU BUEA Ca gals) C3) ape Maat eS AUP Be ip Ak. a UI ea Un) yh gl nt eee nee ee 128 Subject slots wes aos eee ee eee RIS ee en Sep epe Rae eee A eee 128 OB ERt Sl Otsu ee wots Fae OR wee a ons 2 eS aay Maes ee ee eh 130 Mirectional-locationalysloteseee ae ee ee ee ee ee 132 ADI Baa Vey FS) Koy rey epg po es 8, ee hE ee ee eS NR EG Saat Wi eo Seger pe a 133 Whiter slab 952) ioe ons ei wn ee he eee eee 134 intermmocatiye-modal slots 450 2 oe ne ee ee ae 134 GOnmeChVe slots ee heathens ers tea oe oe ee teeta ee 134 Sequential-orderine of function: slots... 22-225. ~ 2 ja4 se ace 135 Predicate crausess- a6 26) seer poet oo 2 eels eee ey eed Se 135 INOn=predicate clauses 232 5 2 a Ee Pe ee 138 Independent versus dependent clauses_______-___-___-_-_-_--_- 139 Supraciaime straenures ne) 2 sl iy ae ee od 139 (Bea AT ie PIL HORABIGCR Meee ot Nahe ee Oe eee ee a re 139 Womiplox ReUneIICES a Sw BE eke ie 140 uote tions eee wien eset ek REP Ty 2c) Seen) oe Al. Bs Sys Ont 141 682-611—64——_8 56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY PAGE Appendix 1. Verb paradigms 2 oot es ee ee et ee 143 EAM STL: VETO MELINA yap Al aC TNS ee ee 143 iransitive'verb: secondary paradiamess 225222 e se eee ee 145 intransitive verb paradigms==—. - 2226 oe. 2a see ee 146 Opened: Lemp e228 tk on Se ee Ne eS ee 155 Hzplanation Of mumbers in texti2o—" = 2222 Ses sess ee eee 163 mopendix o., VOtHbUlaty soo 8 oo cree on coo etn ee ee 165 Wninflectedwords!2.2. = ose ee ee 165 Ve D SS ret ae ee ee a eee bee eS ee 169 Atixes andicliticst 22258. han le Sot eee eewc kee 176 oni words = eee Se OC Dee ee 180 Indextto vocabulary-1-2- 22: eee le eee ese. ee 182 aterature eitede == ne oe eee cee le ee en ee 190 PREFACE Data for this monograph were collected at intervals from 1954 through 1961 under the auspices of the Summer Institute of Linguistics. Much of the phonological material first appeared in my master’s thesis and the grammatical material in my doctor’s dissertation, both prepared at the University of New Mexico (1958 and 1960) under the supervision of Stanley S. Newman. Sincere thanks are due the latter for his understanding guidance and for the many hours of consultation spared from his busy schedule. Many features of the language as recorded in this paper are shared with the other Keresan dialects, among which Santa Ana is rather centrally located both geographically and linguistically. While much remains to be done in adequately describing Keresan linguistic structure, it is hoped that this analysis will be found worthy of a place among the contributions to our knowledge of a heretofore little-known language. The analysis almost can be said to be that of an idiolect rather than a dialect. It is based largely on data obtained from one informant, a middle-aged man whose mother tongue is that of the Santa Ana Pueblo. JI am deeply indebted to him for the endless hours which he spent in patiently supplying the material without which this work would have been impossible. 57 ait LL ee ae Be | | GATT ; a | ie Oe A ae) aa 7 Sen = eT NO ea | : ro: ae Be rin: i Smiise wo. Fs Ley = ] ’ ah pa many % Merk vainiltigil = os: whic EGA twa eo P Inia to qomivtonue efi Gane att he et) sod bite ponnbitra gaipuaiqesbius 2 airl a walinl sd)-aob Mee slode ioe Yad at coil leg! hothvilirentes To aie nd botils ote mac ail) ar habronewt 24 4: es rail Sit to an terteah ee wile’ @. aah. eine douly unornia siooleth cea a wide | dowitoldwW vilanttarowel ban vilnoliqparsg6n2 hae hadonal 4 onfettionti! ttadotaa yoidtivenh eotanpaie af doh otf ae ae orniley eto Yadiow bartoi eel Lite aterfies wit dette ba rote St oh, nwoogd-elNit sielotarnd a to oubslwovel vo oF anoitne 1100 ote Weiorbi wa To jac? od of Niwa od hexuertié Ametuste Albeo Ae nD inet baatnide niah too ¢lvetal baaad ta ; ingint Bh cad ail S0P.10 dae) af auune) witiog olw win betnalbhut 2 oa meine anf wl 1s dab Nasab ta | ofdoy? ak ; 4% ; sat hiorGiw lnitetane acd! p Ua Thi (Mutat he ad ddidey @ inet read oven blow of Ter eid? de i) al J : a ee “es ; i * 7 aay Lae THE LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO By Irvine Davis PHONOLOGY SYLLABLE STRUCTURE Santa Ana Keresan utterances normally may be segmented ex- haustively into recurrent structural units, or syllables, of the shape CV. The syllable margin, C, is composed of a simple consonant or a phonetically complex consonantal segment. The nucleus, V, consists of a vowel or vocalic sequence, with or without terminal glottal closure. A few loanwords and a word of possible onomatopoetic origin contain syllables which are closed by a nasal: nér4n orange (Spanish naranja) ?aydumbimer drum Syllables closed by consonants other than a glottal stop, however, are considered as an aberrant pattern. Excluding sounds introduced by loanwords, there are 48 contras- tive syllable margins: ' b d dy g p t é k p t é k sb sd sd¥ sg sp st sé sk sp st st sk Z Z c ¢ é é 8 8 8 $ $ S m n m n r r w y ee Ww y 1 The symbols herein used conform to the orthography developed by Wick R. Miller (1959 a, 1959 b, and 1960). 59 60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The stops include a voiceless unaspirated series, b, d, and g; a voiceless aspirated series, p, t, and k; and a glottalized series, p, t, and k, at bilabial, alveolar, and velar points of articulation: bi-su bee pi-ta step on it pi-ta let him step on it di kupawa maybe he chopped ti kupawaneE maybe we chopped ti kupawa maybe I chopped ga-ma his house kA-ni let me walk kA-ni he walked The alveopalatals, d’, é, and é, require special comment. These are grouped with the stops for the sake of symmetry and because there is evidence for their historic development from a set of stops parallel to the bilabial, alveolar, and velar sets. The voiceless alveopalatal stop, d’, is unaspirated preceding a voiced vowel and aspirated preceding a voiceless vowel: cidya I caught him si-d¥a squirrel The voiceless alveopalatal affricates, é and é, are aspirated and elottalized respectively: éigiya maybe he sat éGgtya sit The Keresan dialects at the present are in various stages of transi- tion to a structure which includes both a set of alveopalatal stops and a set of affricates at the same point of articulation. Acoma, for instance, has a few occurrences of glottalized alveopalatal stops which contrast with the unglottalized phoneme. It also has unaspirated alveopalatal affricates occurring in loanwords. The Santa Ana dialect has unaspirated affricates in loanwords but has not developed aspirated or glottalized alveopalatal stops as distinct phonemes. Each of the above stops and affricates may occur in a sibilant cluster: sbiga woodpecker scédu?u =a crowd sdii-er bowl-shaped skt-nd blackbird sdyiudi? I (didn’t) give it to him wispI cigarette sgd-wasr_ rat sté-c1 straight spéré-n4 plate stisa six sti-nd autumn skasi fish There are voiceless unaspirated affricates, z and z; voiceless aspirated affricates, c and ¢; and voiceless glottalized affricates, ¢ and ¢, at alveolar and retroflexed points of articulation: zadya desert zaku let him bite you cact breath caku maybe you bit him caku = it bit him caku maybe I bit you Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 61 There is a series of voiceless sibilants, s, s and 8, and of glottalized sibilants, §, $ and gs at alveolar, retroflexed and alveopalatal points of articulation respectively: sa back 3a mine sa scattered $a you are mine va ete E $aska roadrunner haé-Suwimr shoe The plain sonorants, m, n, r, w, and y, and the glottalized sono- rants, m, n, t, Ww, and y, are normally voiced but occur as voiceless variants when flanked by voiceless vowels: kiicayawa he is angry sgihima I believe In their occurrence between a voiced and a voiceless vowel they may be voiceless, partly voiced, or fully voiced, depending on factors such as the rate of speech: diya dog cina turkey gi-ma his house Unlike other glottalized consonants, which are produced with the glottis closed, glottalized sonorants are initiated with a momentary glottal closure and release. The nasals are produced at bilabial and at alveolar or alveopalatal points of articulation. The alveopalatal variant occurs preceding a front vowel, while the alveolar form occurs elsewhere: mésé-ni_ leaf mé4-ni word not prairie dog ne down néku will bite ni-ziwa will pay The phonemes r and ¢ are alveolar flaps, while w, w, y and y are nonsyllabic vocoids: rawdé- good stita crow wi-wd4 medicine waé-yusa duck ya?di sand yauni stone The ‘glottal fricative,’ h, and the glottal stop, ?, complete the inventory of native consonants: hd-bi feather 24?4-tawi key Sounds introduced through loanwords include the voiceless unas- pirated alveopalatal affricate, Z; the voiced stops, B, D and «a; and the voiced alveolar lateral, 1: Zi-Ti chili Bend4-na window (Spanish ventana) ?amd-pu = pillow (Spanish almohada) Gayé-ta biscuit (Spanish galleta) 1é-Ba coat (Spanish leva) Phonemic sequences introduced by loanwords include stops plus r or | and nasals plus homorganic stops: bla-sa city (Spanish plaza) sandiya-ku St. James (Spanish Santiago) 62 Vowels are produced at five contrastive tongue positions and may be either voiced or voiceless: BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 High front unrounded, i and 1. Mid to low front, e and E. Low central, a and a. High central to back unrounded, 9 and @. Mid to high back rounded, u and v. Examples of the five voiced vowels in initial syllables are as follows: séwi my neck sdnaA middle si again sa back siw4 yesterday Voiced and voiceless vowels are in nearly complementary distri- bution. Relevant conditioning factors include the position of the vowel within larger phonological units, the pattern of suprasegmental features, and the nature of contiguous consonants. Word-final vowels, for instance, are normally voiceless if they are short, un- accented, and not preceded by an unglottalized sonorant which is in turn preceded by a long accented or by an unaccented vowel: cinA turkey éA-pI fly tA-ma _ five gupl forehead Compare: Sina- louse gasé white dv4-na four gdnami beans There are, however, a number of words containing voiced vowels in environments in which voiceless vowels normally occur. It is because of these occurrences that phonemic significance must be ascribed to voicing versus voicelessness in vowels: gudi give it to me mina salt sbiga woodpecker kdsdi_ his foot Examples of the five voiceless vowels in final and in medial positions are as follows: not prairie dog kéucrgai maybe SUpE I ate ziyucEya — he carried it ?awaka baby yawasti stick ki-ka winter héeaskéwa willow yuku away zikusdyawi bridge Vowels occur singly or in clusters of two. sequences have been recorded: iu as in siuni ei as in dvéicr eu as in Géu’?u ai as in sai AI as in ¢Cikar au as in hau ui as in stlist ua occurring in the data only in pdguara The following vowel I know him pinion pine I gave it to him all he lay down who bluejay salamander Anthrop, Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 63 The nucleus of a syllable consists of one of the single vowels or vowel clusters, with or without terminal glottal closure. The nucleus is also the domain of certain suprasegmental features yet to be de- scribed. ‘Terminal glottal closure is written as a segmental feature only in unstressed syllables: ndza? will say si-ba?tu I slept Contrastive suprasegmental features include accent and vowel length. There are four kinds of accent: level, indicated by an acute accent; falling, indicated by a circumflex accent; breathy, indicated by a grave accent; and glottal, indicated by an apostrophe over the vowel. Unaccented vowels are not marked. Level accented vowels are stressed and normally have a high level pitch: kder ten zawini old There is a tendency for a slight upglide in pitch on long vowels or vowel clusters with level accent: ké-ct antelope hdéubaé- everyone The pitch on level accented vowels is conditioned to some degree by the position in the word and by the nature of the preceding consonant. A vowel preceded by a plain sonorant, for instance, often has a higher relative pitch than a vowel in a comparable position but preceded by one of the other consonants. The two vowels of ¢4m4 tomorrow normally have approximately the same pitch, while there is a pro- nounced drop in pitch on the second syllable of g48é white. Falling accent occurs only on long vowels or vowel clusters and is characterized by a downglide in pitch together with diminishing stress: dé-ni pumpkin yAuni stone mésé-ni_ leaf Vowels or vowel clusters with breathy accent begin with voicing and terminate in voicelessness. The initial voiced segment is short and stressed, and has a relatively high pitch: cact breath maidvana seven Single short accented vowels or accented vowel clusters which are terminated by glottal closure are written with the glottal accent: gaku he is located saubénaca I sewed A voiceless echo vowel may follow the release of the glottal stop, although this is not a consistent feature. The reasons for treating glottal accent as a phenomenon distinct from the glottal closure in unstressed syllables derive largely from comparative considerations. Vowel length always occurs with falling accented vowels and may occur with level accented or with unaccented vowels: pa-ni bag Gind river hawe- snow A slight downglide in pitch tends to occur on final long unaccented vowels. 64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Potential combinations of the 48 syllable margins with the various types of nuclei number several thousand. Only a fraction of these, however, actually occur in the data. The lack of some combinations may be attributed to incomplete data or to the extremely low proba- bility of certain rare types of nuclei following the less common margins. The absence of other kinds of combinations is apparently a relevant feature of the phonological structure. The more important of these are as follows: 1. A bilabial semivowel, w or w, is never followed by the back rounded vowel, u. 2. An alveopalatal semivowel, y or y, is never followed by the high front vowel, i. 3. A retroflexed consonant, ¢, ¢, z, %, 8, or $, is never followed by a front vowel, i or e. ; 4. An alveopalatal affricate or fricative, é, ¢, 8, or g, is never followed by the high central unrounded vowel, a. 5. The voiceless unaspirated stops and affricates, b, d, g, z, and z are never followed by a voiceless vowel. WORD STRUCTURE The definition of a word is treated in a later section. Here the general phonological structure of words is described. Words may be composed of a single syllable, za no, but are more often dissyllabic or polysyllabic. Words of up to nine syllables have been recorded: sgi-wakaéaniguyase-tH we are (not) looking at them. With few exceptions, each of the 48 margins may occur in any syllable of the word. The margins s¢, ¢ and § show evidence of special development and occur only word-initially as verb prefixes. Although h is very common initially, its extremely low frequency of occurrence in medial position is significant. In the present data it occurs in this position only in gtih4ya bear and in verbs based on the cores, -hima to believe and -hé?é-z4nt to permit. Each of the single voiced vowels may occur in any syllable of the word, while the voiceless vowels may occur in any except the initial syllable. Of the vowel clusters, iu is found almost exclusively in the initial syllable of verbs where it is divided by a morpheme boundary. The distribution of eu is similar, although the particle ?eu is of very frequent occurrence. The sequences ai, au, and ui are found in all positions in the word, while the remaining clusters occur so infre- quently that generalizations are impossible. Level accented syllables, both short and long, are found in all positions in the word. The glottal accent may occur on any syllable, but only rarely on other than the first. Falling and breathy accents may occur on an initial or medial, but never a final, syllable. Although any syllable of the word may be unaccented, the initial syllable is accented in an overwhelming majority of the words. Anthrop. Pap. myo Ro]? LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 65 Word patterns based on the number of syllables and the arrange- ment of suprasegmental features are extremely varied. The more commonly occurring patterns found among dissyllabic and trisyllabic words are indicated below: CVCV niya night CVCV gAsé white CV-CV sté-c1 straight CV-CV sbi-n4 chicken CV-CV da-ni pumpkin CVCV déeku they went CVCV cécl wall CVCVCV sinani flesh CVCVCV ?AsAni wheat CVCVCV dimay4 Santa Ana Pueblo CVCV-CV skiré-né& peas CVCV-CV hiy4-ni road CVCVCV ?iwaka baby CV-CVCV nt-bada alone CV-CVCV ya-Cint corn CY-CV-CV ?d-mii-cr gun CV-CVCV di-skima cornhusk CV-CVCV wa-yuga duck CVCVCV maidyana seven RHYTHM GROUPS A rhythm group is a segment of speech which is marked off by pauses and/or which is characterized by the presence of one syllable of extra intensive stress. This unit may consist of an isolated mono- syllabic word, such as yu- J don’t know, but ordinarily embraces a sequence of many syllables. In normal speech (i.e., in which there are no hesitation pauses) the boundaries of a rhythm group fall at word boundaries, although every word boundary is not a rhythm group boundary. The number of words included in a rhythm group depends on the grammatical content of the particular utterance and on the style of speech. A free flowing conversational style is characterized by rhythm groups that include relatively long segments of speech. Such extensive groups are consequently few in number in relation to those in a comparable utterance delivered in a more vigorous or in a more hesitating style of speech. In rapid speech the pauses tend to be few in number and the onset of a new rhythm group may be signaled only by a rise in intensity and pitch on an accented syllable. This syllable is most often the initial syllable of the rhythm group. Rhythm groups are normally characterized by a gradual falling off of the general pitch level and intensity following the syllable which receives the greatest stress. The extent of this falling off depends on the length of the rhythm group. Toward the end of a very long 66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 rhythm group the speech may fade into a whisper in which normally voiced phonemes are unvoiced. In contrast to normal rhythm groups, an utterance may sometimes show no diminishing of pitch on successive accented syllables. This is true of certain types of questions or other utterances for which a response is anticipated: ma- ha4awé- su ?imdmd Listen here, grandchild. . . Hortatory utterances often are characterized by a gradual diminish- ing of the pitch level as in a normal rhythm group until the final syllable is reached. The final syllable is then given an extra emphasis that involves the rearticulation of a normally voiced vowel or the voicing of a normally voiceless vowel together with added intensity and pitch: hawé- ?i-ma?d Come here! disi ba Ciyai-kami Waitt for me here! Compare the same utterances without the hortatory emphasis: hawé- ?i-ma | disi ba ¢iyd-kam1 MORPHOPHONEMICS The morphophonemic rules outlined below consist of a series of statements which simplify the morphological description to follow. Included for consideration are a number of changes in stems and in affixual morphemes which are somewhat regular and which can be explained on the basis of the phonological environment. Two processes, vowel reduction and the voicing or unvoicing of vowels, are rather extensive in their operation and are described in the following two sections respectively. ‘Miscellaneous Processes” deals with a number of phenomena of more restricted occurrence. Excluded for consideration here are numerous cases of phonolog- ically similar forms (e.g., the second person subject markers s- and 8-) which at an earlier stage in the language may have been in mutually exclusive distribution in terms of their phonological environment. In a synchronic description of the present Santa Ana dialect, however, they are most conveniently treated as allomorphs, the distribution of which is defined morphologically rather than phonologically. VOWEL REDUCTION Changes in the vowel or vowels immediately following the pronom- inal affix in verbs may often be explained in terms of vowel reduction. This involves a fusing of the thematic adjunct with a preceding voice prefix or with the vowel of a preceding pronominal affix. Vowel reduction normally follows the patterns outlined below. An roP 4; 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 67 1. Two contiguous identical vowels reduce to a single vowel of the same quality. This reduction takes place, for instance, when a pronominal prefix of the shape CV- precedes a stem having an initial vowel of the same quality as that of the prefix: saku (Sa- + -aku) I bit you Compare: sduni (Sa- + -tni) I know you Apparent shifts in accent in the above and other examples arise from orthographic conventions. Accent is indicated only on the first vowel of a cluster, although it is the entire cluster that is accented. This, together with the fact that accent is not indicated on prefixes of the shape CV- (the prefix vowel assumes the accent of the following thematic adjunct), results in a shift of the written accent to the prefix vowel. Vowel reduction of the above type also occurs when the reflexive prefix -a- or the passive prefix -4?a- precedes a verb stem beginning with -a-: siku (§- + -a- + -Aku) you bit yoursel SA?agune (S- + -d4?a- + -Agune) you were bitten Compare: gaukaéa (8- + -a- + -tkaéa) you saw yourself SA’audi?ta (S + -d?a- + -tdi?ta) it was given to you 2. No vowels or vowel clusters of more than two moras’ length occur. A reduction from three to two moras of length takes place when a short and long vowel are juxtaposed: ci-zawa (¢i- + -{-ziwa) I paid him cuizGwa (Cu- + -f-ztiwa) you paid me 3. The vowel -u- followed immediately by -a- reduces to the single vowel -a-. This occurs when the pronominal prefix ends with -u- and the verb stem begins with -a-: éaku (Gu- + -aku) you bit me kaku (ku- + -Aakv) bite me skaku (sku- + -aku) he bit me Compare: Gdiziwa (éu- + -{-ztiwA) you paid me ktiziwa (ku- + -{-ztiwA) pay me sktiziwa (sku- + -i-ziwa) he paid me 4. The vowel -i- immediately followed by -a- reduces to the single vowel -e-. This takes place when a pronominal prefix ending with —i— precedes a verb stem beginning with —a-: séku (si- + -Aku) TI bit him téku (ti- + -aku) maybe I bit him péku (pi- + -aku) let him bite him 68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Compare: sfukAica (si- + -t-kaica) I hit him tiukaica (ti- + -i-kaica) maybe I hit him piukadica (pi- + -G-kaica) let him hit him 5. The vowel -i- immediately followed by -o- reduces to the single vowel -i-. This takes place when certain stems beginning with -9- are preceded by a prefix containing -i-: siska (si- + -dsk a) I drank si-t4 (si- + -d-t4) I am full Compare: gaska (g- + -dskA) he drank gé-ta (g- + -d-td) at is full 6. The vowel -a- followed immediately by -o- reduces to the se- quence -ai-. This change occurs in the first person hortative form of some verbs having stems which begin with -a-: kaiska (ka- + -§ska) let me drink Compare: kdiba?tu (ka- + -i-ba?tu) let me sleep 7. The vowels -a- and -u- followed immediately by a short level accented -i- reduce to -4- and -1- respectively: Sdsti (Sa- + -fsti) I gave you a liquid dyusti (dyu- + -isti) you gave me a liquid Compare: zisti (zi- + -isti) he gave him a liquid A vowel cluster results, however, if the -i- is characterized by any other type of accent. sdiziwa (sa- + -f-ztiwa) J paid you Chita (cu- + -f-ta) you stepped on me ciisaca (Cu- + -i$acA) you named me The patterns of vowel reduction outlined above avoid the following vowel sequences: -ua-, -la-, -io-, -ae- and double vowels. With the exception of a single recorded example of -ua-, these vowel clusters do not occur in Santa Ana Keresan. Other nonoccurring sequences, -le-, -ae-, -e0-, -ea-, -0e-, -ol-, -aa-, -oU-, -ue- and -uo-, involve vowels which are never brought into juxtaposition in morphological con- structions. In addition to the vowel reduction already described there are certain patterns of reduction which involve semivowels. A stem- initial -uw- (in which the -u- is short) reduces to -w- when preceded by a prefix of the shape CV-: ziwa-sa (zi- + -Gwa-sa) he 7s sick Antrop4; 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 69 Compare: guzuiwa-sa (géz- + -tiwa-sa) you are sick Under similar conditions -1y- reduces to -y-. This reduction, how- ever, may be alternatively explained as an example of the pattern u+i->t previously described. sktiyanikuya (sku- + -fyanikuya) he told me Compare: éfyanikuya (¢i- + -fyanikuya) TI told him In stems of four or more syllables, an initial -uwi- (but not -uwi- or -uwi--) reduces to -ui- when preceded by a prefix of the shape C-: guistkuya (g- + -tiwiStkuya) he scolded him The reduction of -uw- to -w- as described above occurs in the same stem when the prefix is of the shape CV-: siwistkuya (si- + -uwiSikuya) TI scolded him Vowel reduction similar to the patterns already described some- times operates across an intervening glottal stop. The following types of reduction have been recorded: 1. -i- plus -a?a- reduces to -e?e-: sé760a (si- + -A?4¢a) my tooth Compare: ZAPAGA (z- + -A?4éA) his tooth 2. -i?- plus -a?a- reduces to -é-?e-: pé-?6-8a (pi?- + -4?4-3a) let him close tt Compare: $A74-8a (S- + -4?4-5a) you closed it 3. -i?- plus a short -i- or -o- with level or breathy accent reduces to -i- when followed by a voiceless consonant: pikupawa (p{?- + -fkupawa) let him chop piska (pi?- + -dska) let him drink Compare: zikupAwa (z- + -fkupawa) he chopped gdska (g- + -dska) he drank Under similar conditions -i?- plus -a- reduces to -é- and -i?- plus -u- reduces to -iu-: pezé (pi?- + -dzé) let him be talkative piukdi (pi?- + -tkdi) let him be satisfied Compare: gazé (g- + -dzé) he is talkative kikdi (k- + -tkdi) he is satisfied 70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Jf the following consonant is a sonorant, -i?- plus -a- becomes -e’e-, -1?- plus -u- becomes -iyu-, and no change is involved if the second vowel is -i-: pé?éyaka (pi?- + -dyaka) let him burn it piytyd (pi?- + -ty4) let him skin it pi?inata (pi?- + -fnata) let him buy it Compare: zdyaka (z- + -dyaka) he burned it gaya (g- + -ty4) he skinned it zinata (z- + -inata) he bought it Changes in the vowel following the pronominal suffix of Type B intransitive verbs are only partly explained in terms of the regular patterns of vowel reduction. The shift to -e or -E in the first person forms of verbs normally taking -a or -a follows the regular pattern of reduction in which -i- plus -a- becomes -e-: 26.36 (?6.- + -si- + -4) my name ca-sE (c4:- + -si- + -a) TI breathed Compare: ?é-94 his name ca-ka he breathed The shift to -e or -5 in the first person forms of verbs normally occurring with -u or -u, however, does not result from any regular pattern of reduction: zusE I went zuku he went VOICING Voiceless vowels occurring in the final syllable (and sometimes those occurring in the penultimate syllable) of a word become voiced under certain conditions of suffixation. A word-final voiceless vowel becomes voiced if it is followed by a suffix containing a voiced vowel: dvukséanikuya (dytvkaéa+-nikuya) you are looking at me dé?4cinu- (d4?4é1+4--nu-) when he arrived Compare: dvukaéa you saw me da? der he arrived Suffixes consisting of a glottalized sonorant followed by a voiceless vowel have a similar effect on a preceding vowel: gigune (giku+-ne) they bit him éiéang (é0éa+-na) maybe they two fell Compare: gaku he bit him éaéa maybe he fell Anthrop.j9?- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS (ip A voiceless vowel cluster becomes voiced when followed by any suffix: stigaitn (stikat+-tn) I (didn’t) lie down Compare: skiikat I lay down Vowel clusters resulting from the suffixation of -kuya (see ‘‘Mis- cellaneous Processes’’) are likewise voiced: subeukuya (supE+-kuya) I am eating Compare: supE I ate Certain final voiceless vowels become voiced and long when followed by any suffix: sdudvimise-te (sdudyamisE-+-tE) we (don’t) remember you Compare: sdudyimise (sdudyimi-+ plural suffix, -8E) we remember you It cannot be predicted from the phonological environment whether or not a voiceless vowel undergoes this change (see ‘“‘Stem variants’’). The fact is indicated in the listing of forms by the vowel length symbol in parentheses: -SE(-) plural suffix A sequence (vowel + unglottalized semivowel ++ vowel) in which neither vowel is accented, behaves as a single unit with respect to voicing; it is either completely voiceless or completely voiced. A voiceless sequence of this type becomes voiced when followed by any suffix: sitiguyasa (satikuya+-sa) you are crying Compare: satikuya you cried Of much less frequent occurrence than the above processes is the unvoicing of a stem-final vowel. This occurs when a completely voiceless suffix follows a stem which normally terminates in an un- accented voiced vowel preceded by a voiceless consonant: s4utisa (S4udi+-sa) I am planting Compare: sdudi I planted The alternation between aspirated and unaspirated consonants seen in some of the examples cited in this section is closely linked to the voicing and unvoicing of vowels. The unaspirated consonants, b, d, g, z, and z, do not occur preceding voiceless vowels. When a normally voiced vowel is unvoiced, as in J am planting, a preceding 682-611—64_9 i2 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 consonant of this group changes to its aspirated counterpart, p, t, k, c, or ¢. When a normally voiceless vowel is voiced, a preceding aspirated consonant is usually replaced by its unaspirated counter- part: gagune (gaAku+-ne) they bit him There are, however, exceptions to the latter rule, in which an aspirated consonant is retained when the following vowel becomes voiced: zikupawank (zikupAwA+-nE) they chopped Compare: zikupawAa_ he chopped MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES Vowel assimilation.—The vowels -a- or -9- occurring in prefixes of the shape CVC- change to -u- when the prefix is attached to verb stems beginning in -u-: eGzukaca (gdz- + -tkaéa) he saw you tti?udvasr (t4?- + -tidyasr) maybe I fasted Compare: gézaku (géz-+ aku) he bit you ta?auta (té?-+-Auta) maybe I killed it The vowel cluster -ai- changes to -ei- following an alveopalatal consonant: ééiwadvameE (é- + -diwadvamhE) they assembled Compare: s4iwadvamE we assembled Change from glottal to level accent.—A glottal accent in the thematic adjunct normally changes to a level accent following a pronominal prefix containing a glottalized consonant: éGpe (& + -ipr) eat Compare: SUupE you ate This type of change does not affect the 4 allomorph of the passive voice prefix: skadva?ta (sku- + -A- + -ddya?ta) I was caught Certain verb stems with a glottalized sonorant following the thematic adjunct show a shift to a plain sonorant when the pronominal prefix contains a glottalized consonant: éiwane (é- + -Gwane) hunt Compare: siwanE you hunted an 89,2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 4S} The glottalized sonorant in stems of this kind may have developed from a plain sonorant preceded by a glottal accent in the thematic adjunct, and thus undergoes the above change. Other stems with a glottalized sonorant in a comparable position do not show this change: kéwasd4 it is sour Introduction of -u-.—The addition of the continuative suffix -kuya to a verb stem ending in -a, -e, or their voiceless counterparts, results in the formation of a vowel cluster the second member of which rhs Dee subeukuya (supe + -kuya) I am eating siwi-deyaukuya (siwi-teya + -kuya) I am worshiping Compare: supE I ate siwi-teya I worshiped Change of ¢ to t—The phoneme ¢ in the final syllable of a word changes to t when followed by a high front vowel: siwi-tita (stiiwi-ca + -(i)ta) I am making it? Compare: siwi-ca I made it Certain pronominal prefixes also show a shift from a retroflexed affricate to an alveolar stop (e.g., sdz- and sdd-; see charts 1 and 2). These allomorphs undoubtedly have developed from the process outlined above, but are, in the present stage of the language, no longer phonologically defined. Forms ending in d sometimes occur before vowels other than 1: séda Iam MORPHOLOGY UNITS OF ANALYSIS While the validity of the word as a universal linguistic unit is some- times questioned, it is found convenient in this description of the grammatical structure of Santa Ana Keresan to recognize such a unit. The morphology-syntax division employed here is based on the assumption that the word can be defined with sufficient precision for descriptive purposes. This does not mean, however, that there may not remain a certain degree of arbitrariness in the drawing of some word boundaries. The principal criterion for recognizing words is that of unlimited substitutability at word boundaries.* Severe restrictions on the 2 For an explanation of the change in the stem-final vowel, see ‘‘Inflectional affixes’ and ‘‘Stem variants.’’ 3 A full treatment of this approach to the definition of a word is given in Greenberg, 1957, pp. 27-34. 74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 number and types of items that may be introduced into an utterance at a morpheme boundary is taken as an indication that the boundary is an infraword boundary. The boundary between a verb core and a following plural subject suffix, for instance, is of this type. The only items that may be introduced at this point are aspect and/or benefactive morphemes, neither of which ever occurs except following a verb core. A morpheme boundary at which a wide variety of items may be introduced, on the other hand, is regarded as a word boundary. Although a verbal auxiliary is closely linked to a preceding verb core and is meaningless in isolation, it is, nevertheless, a separate word according to the above criterion. Not only may a number of suffixes occur following the verb core and preceding the auxiliary, but also items which, on the basis of distributional criteria, are themselves free words may be introduced at this point. Words may be exhaustively segmented into morphemes. The term is used here in the sense generally used in American descriptive linguistics and includes word roots as well as various kinds of deriva- tional and inflectional affixes and clitics. Clitics in Santa Ana Keresan are morphemes which, following the distributional criteria for marking word boundaries, are parts of words. They differ from affixes in that they are not so closely linked phonologically to the rest of the word. Specifically, they do not cause morphophonemic voicing of a preceding voiceless vowel and are much more likely than are affixes to be separated from the rest of the word by a pause. WORD CLASSES Three major word classes are distinguished on the basis of their internal structure. Of these, the verbs and the verbal auxiliaries occur with inflectional affixes. The third major word class is composed of all uninflected words. Three principal levels of internal structuring are recognized in words: inflection, stem formation, and derivation. The terms inflec- tion and inflectional affixes are used only with reference to those affixes which are external to the stem. Stem formation involves the combina- tion of a thematic adjunct with a core and may include the addition of a benefactive suffix as well. The term derivation is used with reference to the internal structuring of certain verb cores and of some words of the uninflected class. Although clitics are, by definition, parts of words rather than free words, they are disregarded in the following description of word structure and are reserved for separate considera- tion. An roPy; 2 ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 75 The general structure of the three major word classes may be distinguished as follows: 1. Verbs are always inflected, always include stem formation and sometimes include derivation. 2. Verbal auxiliaries are always inflected but never include stem formation or derivation. 3. Uninflected words include neither inflection nor stem formation but may include derivation. Specific morphemes involved in each level of structuring also may serve to distinguish the major word classes. Verbs are distinguished from verbal auxiliaries, for instance, in that all verb stems are po- tentially capable of occurring with a future tense marker while verbal auxiliaries never include this morpheme. VERBS VERB INFLECTION GRAMMATICAL CATEGORIES The following grammatical categories are expressed by verb inflec- tion, or, less commonly, by changes in the verb stem: Subject person.—First, second, or third person subject is recognized in all intransitive verbs in the non-future tense. It is most commonly indicated by a prefix, although in some verbs the pronominal element is a suffix: s-upE I ate zu-sE I went s-UpE you ate zu-su you went k-lupE he ate zu-ku he went In addition, some verbs occur with a pronominal morpheme indicating indefinite subject: sk-Aukui one’s wives Subject-object person.—The subject and object of every transitive verb in the non-future tense are indicated by a single prefix. Seven principal subject-object combinations are recognized. First person subject with third person object: s-éku I bit him Second person subject with third person object: s-aku you bit him Third person subject with third person object: g-aku he bit him First person subject with second person object: s-Aku I bit you Second person subject with first person object: éaku you bit me Third person subject with first person object: sk-aku he bit me Third person subject with second person object, géz-Aku he bit you In some, but not all, transitive verbs a fourth person subject with third person object is recognized which is distinct from the third person subject with third person object: g-aku he (third person) bit him é-aku he (fourth person) bit him 76 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Fourth person is used when the subject of the action is obscure, as when the speaker is telling of something that he himself did not observe. It is also used when the subject of the action is inferior to the object, as when an animal is the subject and a human being the object. Number.—Singular, dual, and plural number are recognized in both the subject of intransitive verbs and in the subject and object of transitive verbs. The dual and plural of transitive verb subjects are normally expressed by suffixation, while the absence of number suffixes indicates singular subject: gaku he bit him gagu-na they two bit him gagu-nE they bit him Subject number of intransitive verbs may be indicated in a variety of ways: 1. By suffixation as in the case of transitive verbs: zikUpAWA he chopped zikupawa-na they two chopped zikupawa-nE they chopped 2. By changes in the thematic adjunct (i.e., the vowel or vocalic complex that ordinarily immediately follows the pronominal affix). These changes are usually accompanied by other number markers but may sometimes constitute the only indication of number: g-du-dvasi he fasted g-U-?i-dyasr they two fasted g-ti-wa-dvasr_ they fasted 3. By the prefixation of different sets of pronominal allomorphs together with suffixation and/or changes in the thematic adjunct: s-iska | I drank s6z-askA we two drank séz-Askata we drank Object number of transitive verbs is indicated by changes in the thematic adjunct: s-é-ku I bit him s-é-?éku I bit them two s-éiya-ku I bit them Tense—Future and non-future tenses are recognized. Verbs which include a pronominal affix are in the non-future tense. Future tense is indicated by replacing the pronominal affix with a tense marker. The pronominal element is then incorporated in a separate word, the verbal auxiliary, which follows the verb: sdiziwa I paid you Hi-ziwa sfuma I will pay you supE I ate nupE si I will eat ga a al LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 77 Mode.—Pronominal affixes indicate not only the person of the subject or the subject and object but also indicate the mode. For each mode there is a distinctive set of pronominal affixes. A total of six modes are recognized; indicative, negative, dubitative, hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. For each subject-object combination, however, only certain modes are indicated formally in the inflection: ¢-i-zuwa I paid him 8-f-zwa you paid him sdy-i-ziwa I (didn’t) pay him $-{-z0WA you (didn’t) pay him t-f-2tiwa maybe I paid him c-{-zuwa maybe you paid him ké-iziwa let me pay him p-i-ziwa pay him n-{-zuwa let me (not) pay him sdy-i-ziwa (don’t) pay him n-{-zuwa let me pay him (in c-i-ziiwa pay him (in the the future) future) Certain particles characteristic of specific modes may precede the verb and are often necessary in order to avoid ambiguity. Verbs in the negative mode, for instance, are always preceded by the negative particle z4zi, and those in the negative hortative mode by the particle ba-mi-: zai sd¥i-ziwa I didn’t pay him bé-mi- sd¥f-ztiwa don’t pay him Voice.—Reflexive-reciprocal and passive voice are indicated by a prefix following the pronominal prefix of transitive verbs together with a distinctive set of pronominal allomorphs. Reflexive and reciprocal voice are indicated by the prefix -a- and are distinguished one from the other by different thematic adjuncts: s-a-ukaéa I saw myself s-A-ukaéanotI we two saw ourselves $-4--yakaéanati we two saw each other Passive voice is indicated by the prefix -4?a- or -4- and takes the plural subject suffix: sk-4?4-iziwa-ne I was paid Aspect.—There are three aspect morphemes. The most common of these expresses continuative action: sfukaéa-nikuya I am looking at him Compare: sfukaéa J saw him A less common aspect morpheme indicates unfulfilled action: supE-wE I have come to eat Compare: supE I ate 78 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The third aspect morpheme indicates a remote state and occurs with only a limited number of verb stems: g6-ta--ma it is full (something remote from the speaker) Compare: d-té it is full (something at hand) Condition.—Verbs which are linked to the larger context by various kinds of subordinate or conditional relationships occur with one of a class of suffixes of rather elusive semantic categorization: sktiztiiwa--ne when he paid me skiiziwa--nu- if he pays me Compare: skiiziwa he paid me In addition to the patterns of inflection indicated above, the expression of specific grammatical categories sometimes involves irregular changes in the verb stem (see pp. 99 ff.). In some cases there are changes of such a revolutionary character that the phenomenon may best be de- scribed as stem suppletion, which most commonly involves intransi- tive verbs in the three numbers: ZU-SE I went sdd-é?éyu we two went séd-éku we went In rare cases, the expression of continuative action or of plural object number in transitive verbs involves stem suppletion: é-Aku he bit him é-fy éina I found him ¢-4-pi-kuya he is biting him s-fwadé-na I feund them INFLECTIONAL AFFIXES Each inflectional affix is assigned an identification number and is a member of a century class. Century classes are numbered according to the relative order of occurrence of their members within transitive verbs. An exception to this sequential numbering of century classes is the case of classes 100 and 200 which are never represented in the same verb. Members of both Century Class 100 and 200 are always in initial position in the verb. Century Class 100 includes all pronominal affixes. Within the class are nine decade classes (100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, and 180), each of which includes affixes indicating a specific subject or subject-object combination. Within each decade class, with the exception of 180, there are six morphemes (numbered 101-106, 111- 116, etc.), each of which is characteristic of a specific mode. Century 4 These are termed ‘‘affixes”’ rather than specifically ‘‘prefixes’’ or ‘‘suffixes’’ because, although they occur most commonly as prefixes, there are some intransitive verbs in which they occur as suffixes. Ano 2 ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 79 Class 200 consists of one morpheme, the future tense affix. Century Class 300 consists of voice prefixes. Century Class 400 consists of aspect suffixes. Century Class 500 consists of number suffixes. Century Class 600 consists of condition suffixes. Affixes of Century Class 100 are tabulated in charts 1 and 2 and comprise a set of pronominal indicators. Those affixes which occur with transitive verbs in their primary paradigms appear in chart 1; those occurring with intransitive verbs and with transitive verbs in their secondary paradigms are listed in chart 2. The two charts overlap to a considerable extent, as many forms appear both with transitive and intransitive verbs. This overlap is so extensive that it is convenient to group those pronominal indicators which occur with intransitive verbs together with those which occur with transitive verbs and which indicate first, second, or third person subject with third person object. Affix 101, for instance, occurs with intransitive verbs indicating first person subject and with transitive verbs indi- cating first person subject with third person object. The difference lies in the fact that there are more allomorphs of each affix affiliated with intransitive verbs than with transitive verbs. The overlapping decade classes appear in the two charts with the designations T or I (e.g., 100T, 1001) indicating transitive or intransitive. The morpheme membership of T and I decade classes are identical: both 100T and 1001, for example, consist of affixes 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106. Decade Class 100I, however, includes many more allomorphs than does Decade Class 100T. Affixes of Century Class 100 form a rather elaborate system. With few exceptions, there is a distinctive affix for each subject-object combination within each of the three principal modes (indicative, dubitative, and hortative). There is, in addition, a distinctive affix for certain subject-object combinations within the negative and the negative hortative modes. A sixth mode, the future hortative, is indicated by affixes which, in most instances, are identical in form with the corresponding dubitative, hortative, or negative hortative affix. For purposes of description, the entire series is filled-in for each of the six modes, although this results in assigning two numbers to certain forms that, from one point of view at least, may be regarded as the same affix (e.g., affixes 111 and 112, 121 and 122). Thus, there are eight decade classes, each of which contains six morphemes indicating the same subject-object combination, plus Decade Class 180 which consists of a single morpheme. Each of the six morphemes within a decade class indicates a different mode. Within each mode the final digit of the affix identification number remains constant. Allomorphs of each pronominal affix are distinguished by upper case letters following the identification number. All allomorphs listed [Bull. 191 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 80 nQ q9gT ny geet ny CPS nQ Est nQ qZg nQ AIST NsP VOGT ns WG¢T ns VFI NsP VEST NsP VST NsP WIGT het. Spe OST ®) OFT 88 acrl eS APF Bo GePl eS ACPI BS GIFT eZ VOT BS VOFI eS VPI BZ VEFI BS VZFI BS WIFI PZ = ST. OFT 4 Esl 9 AZET 9? GIST 1d 9¢T 1d cet 1d FEI Ip VEST IZ VZEI 1Z WISI pe Uy Ost 1d q9ZI 1d q¢ZI id qFZI Ip Cz 1Z ACSI 1Z GTZ Id V9ZI td VEZI 1d VPI sP WEsl 3 VZGI 3 VIZI pe pg LOZ 10 GOI Isp8 GGT 1 GFT 10 (SIT I$ (ZIT 1§ GTIT 9 V9IT 3S VSIT 9 VPIT 9 VEIT 8 VZIT 8 VIIT pg PZ LOTT tu q90T 1m SOT ey aPor 1 Gsol IsPS GZOT 1 G01 Iu V90T tu VOT BY VFOL 1 VOI 8S VZOI Is VIOT pg ST LOOT 9ATBY1OY 9AT}RYIOY ehaquhans DATPVSIN 9AI}C410 FT sAIVBYIGNG OAT}VSON aAryeorpuy | ‘fqg ‘fqng SSBID i aa) a. Gk eo ee ok ae he Le Ve. ee es SS S| = a oe ope apBo9q opoyl uosieg 81 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS Anthrop. Pap. No. 69] subypoing fispuiig ay], UL squad aayrsunsy ypn burtunsoQ sory y pourmouo.g QOT ssvjQ fanjuag—] Lava TPlP COLT 98 {GLI IP APLT | IPlsP ASAT | IES qZLT | Ipes ATLT ZsP VOLT sP8 VGLT ZVPLI Z@sP VELT Ze3 VZLI ze3 VILT PZ pg OLT Tpeu q9OT | Ipeuggor | peu gPFOT Tpe} GSor 28 {ZI nyAs {OT zeu VO9T zeu VG9T zeu VFO 204 VE9T sP8S VZ9T 3S VIO SI =—pe O9T [Bull. 191 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 82 9 O9IT 1 Goll 9 VOLT tpeu FOOT peu 901 zeu A9OT elt HOOT a 901 U 9901 1m q90T td Y90OI 9AT}B110Y oingn iy AS OSII IspS (SII 9S VGIT 48 OGOT FS dO IS OSOT § NSOT § WS0I Tpeu 'TSOT peu SGOT zeu GOT Ja TSOT U HOLT u HOI 6PA ASOT 4 ASOT ey GS0T BY OGOl 1 @SOr tu VGOI OAIYB4.10Y 9AT}BS9 NT } OFIT JOST Id qPIT 10 GIT d VFIl 9 VEIT 138 OFOT 6148 dé01 48 OFOT § NFOT § WHO Ipeu THOT peu SFOT zeu (FOI g}U IFOT a HOT 413 HESOT U OFOT Tpe} OEOI 1 AFOT pe? ASOT TU WFOT Ze} ASOL 6°41 GFOL 684 AS01 X OFOL 4 O801 BY APOr 1) G@E0r BY VFOL 1} VEOI DATPLPIOFZ | IArTzeyqng opoy 8 Ozll 1 QZII 8 VZII 98 Z0T 128 IZOT 28 HZOL sPS YZ0T 6°48 AZOT BSS HZOT 4S AZOT AS OZOL IsPS {Z0T 8S VZOT 8 OLIT I$ @III 8 VIII NYS (TOT 5S TIOT pes HIOT ZeS OTOL 438 ATOT 1S AIOT $ CIOT 8 OLOL 19 QO IS VIOT 83 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS Anthrop. Pap. No. 69] swbypoivg hinpuosagy ay], UL sian aarpsuDiy, pup aapsun4uy yn bursinaQ saxyfy Jourmouorg OOT ssvjp hunjuag—'z% LAVHO 28 (IST 28 OI8T 4S €18t 98 VISTI oyrayopuy eid OOZT eed F9ST ed MOST d q9zt d 0921 id q9Zt Id V9ZT IPlaP OIIT PlaP A9TT ZesPp HOTT 289 GOTT 4 (EST 9 (ZZ 1) IZ 19 1221 4 Hes 9 Hze1 ed OSZT eid OFZ P O&ZI Z OTS od TSZT eed APE 6P2 ASS oP AST ed Wes ed WPZI BaP ASST v8 ACSI d asa d ara 2 CEZI marca d OgzI d OFZI 2 O&ZI HOSEL 1d qGZI id qPzI IP A&Z1 IZ ZS 1d VGZI Id V¥ZI sP VEZI 3 VZZI 98 (SIT 128 IGTT 28 HTT Bish sP8 OGTT IP OPIT | IPlkPOSIT | tes OZIT oBAS ASTI P AFIT PleP ASTT pes AIT ees ASTI ZAUPIT | 2sP WSIT ze3 SIT AS (SIT QdrIT | ed Gert § dZII 2 £TZT 19 ITZT 9? HIZI ZOIZI 6? AISI 8 HIZI Y AIZI YT. OLE 1Z GIZl 3 VIZI Tpes OTIT pes AIT ze3 WITT § CIIT PE I 02T 84 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 in the charts are morphologically defined, i.e., their occurrence cannot be predicted in terms of phonological environment. Phonologically - defined allomorphs (e.g., gtiz derived by morphophonemic vowel assimilation from géz) are not listed in the charts but may be predicted from the morphophonemic processes described under ‘‘Morpho- phonemics.”’ The same upper case letters have been used to identify allomorphs which tend to be affiliated with the same group of verbs. This consistency is especially evident in transitive verbs and within each decade class: éi-ziwa (101B-+verb stem) I paid him sdvi-ziwa (102B+verb stem) TI (didn’t) pay him ti-ziwa (103B-+verb stem) maybe I paid him etc. This tendency also is manifested to a lesser degree from one decade class to another within each mode: éi-ziwa (101B+verb stem) J paid him Si-ziwa (111B+verb stem) you paid him zi-zawa (121B+verb stem) he paid him etc. The fact that not all affixes have the same number of allomorphs, makes it obvious that this tendency cannot hold true in the case of every verb. Intransitive verbs, especially, often show a shift from one series of allomorphs to another even within the same decade class: sdz4-?abe (101G+-verb stem) we two ate sgd-?abe? (102A+verb stem) we two (didn’t) eat tdz4-?abe (103E+verb stem) maybe we two ate etc. The phonetic shape and distribution of many affixes of Century Class 100 is suggestive of certain historical processes. It is probable that many of the B-allomorphs were derived from the corresponding A-allomorphs either through glottalization (compare 141B with 141A, for example) or through palatalization (compare 111B with 111A). B-allomorphs that appear to be a palatalized form of the corresponding A-allomorphs nearly always occur with verb stems beginning in -i-. The few exceptions prevent the phenomenon from being described as a morphophonemic process. Another type of historical development is suggested by the overlap in phonetic form of certain allomorphs of affixes belonging to different decade classes. This overlap is evident when one compares affixes of Decade Class 100I with those of 160, affixes of Decade Class 1101 with those of 170, and affixes of Decade Class 120 with those of 130. This suggests that the system of pronominal affixation may have Anthrop. 3 No oT 2 «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 85 developed from one in which intransitive subject and transitive object were equated. Century Class 200 is comprised of a single morpheme which indi- cates future tense. It replaces affixes of Century Class 100 as to position in the verb but not as to function. The future tense affix includes the following allomorphs: 201A n 201B_ oni 201C n 201D_ ni 201E ni? 201F nédz 201G_ néd 201H néddi Examples of allomorphs of affix 201 are as follows: n-UpE will eat ni-ukaéa will see n-auta will kill ni-udi? will give nikupawane- (nfi?- + -fkupawane-) will chop (plural subject) ndz-4-? abe? will eat (dual subject) ndd-a? will be nédiubu-cr will be frightened Century Class 300 contains two morphemes, 301 and 302, which function as voice indicators and occur prefixed to transitive verbs following the pronominal prefix. Affix 301 expresses reflexive or reciprocal action with the single allomorph 301 -a-. Affix 302 indicates passive voice and includes two allomorphs: 302A -4?a- and 302B -a-. The following examples illustrate the affixes of Century Class 300: $-a-ukaéa I saw myself sk-4?4-iziwa-ne I was paid sk-a-d¥a?ta I was caught Century Class 400 is comprised of three morphemes, 401, 402, and 403, which function as aspect indicators and (except for 401H) are suffixed to verb stems. Affix 401 indicates continuative action and includes the following allomorphs: 401A -kuya 401B -nikuya 401C_ -tikuya 401D -ku AQIE -(i)ta(-) 401F -sa 401G_ -éadyaya 401H reduplication of the verb core 86 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The following examples illustrate occurrences of allomorphs of affix 401: subeu-kuya I am eating gukaéa-nikuya he is looking at him cidya?-tikuya I am catching him kéiskd-?azai-ku he is turning around sfukaicr-ta I am hitting him sduti-sa I am planting kA-ni-tadvaya he is walking wéko-woke-ka it is shaking Associated with allomorph 401K, -(i)ta, is a change from -a or -a to -i or -I in the stem-final vowel of the verb to which it is suffixed. Compares siukaica J hit him with siukéicita Iam hitting him. Affix 402, which refers to unfulfilled action, contains the following allo- morphs: 402A -nx(-) 402B -nx(-) 402C -wer Illustrations of the occurrence of allomorphs of affix 402 are as follows: C{-zawa-nE I came to pay him sfukaéa-nE I came to see him SUDE-WE I came to eat Affix 403 expresses remote state and has the single allomorph,403 -ma;: gé-ta--ma it is full (something remote) Century class 500 contains two morphemes, 501 and 502, which express subject number. They are suflixed either directly to the verb stem or follow affixes of Century Class 400. Affix 501 indicates dual subject and includes the following allomorphs: 501A -na 501E -moti 501B -notr(-) 501F -rhasutr 501C_ -dz 501G@_-sutr 501D -mha 501H -pa The occurrence of these allomorphs is illustrated by the following examples: sikupawa-na we two chopped sdiské-?a zai-moti we two turned around Siukaéa-noati we two saw him siuni-masuti we two know him $idya?-dy¥1 we two caught him sddé-?E-sut1 we two are sdudi-ma we two planted siwi-deya-pa we two worshipped Affix 502, expressing plural subject, has the following allomorphs: 502A -nx(-) 502H -wsE 502B -nx(-) 5021 = -8n(-) 502C_ -ta(-) 502J = -81 502D -mzr 502K -?E 502E -msr 502L -(i)ya 502F -masa 502M _ -sx(-) 502G -wa Anthrop.,Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 87 Examples of the allomorphs of affix 502 are as follows: sikupawa-nE we chopped siwi-deya-wa we worshiped sfukaGéa-nE we saw him 24?4-+A-wE they opened it $idva?-ta we caught him ~=stwad¥ima-SE our brother s4w4-di-mE we planted Z6?6-bai?-s1 we went to sleep sdy4-ské-?azai-mE we turned around sawawane-?E we hunted $funi-rhasa we know him Si-ziwi-ti-ya we are paying him Sfukaéaniguya-sE we are looking at him Century Class 600 is comprised of three morphemes, 601, 602, and 603, which express conditional or contrary-to-fact action. Affix 601 has two allomorphs, 601A -ne and 601B -de. Affix 602 has a single allomorph, 602 -nu-. Affix 603 likewise has a single allomorph, 603 -tr. The following examples illustrate the occurrence of these allomorphs: skiiztiwa--ne when he paid me gikaéane--de when they saw him skiiziwa--nu- if he pays me It is difficult to differentiate affixes 601 and 602 by meaning function except that the latter apparently has a dubitative connotation lacking in the former. Affix 603 occurs with many verbs in the nega- tive mode which have a plural subject: sgukaéane--tE we (didn’t) see him DISTRIBUTION OF AFFIXES The distribution within verbs of the inflectional affixes, the thematic adjunct (TA), the verb core, and the benefactive suffix (B) serves to distinguish three major structural types. These are represented by three formulas: 1. TV=+100+300+ TA+ Core+ 400+ B+ 500+ 600/ + 200+ 300+ TA-+ Core+ 400+ B+ 500 Transitive verbs are composed of three obligatory parts, a prefix of either Century Class 100 or Century Class 200 followed by a thematic adjunct and a verb core. Prefixes of Century Class 300 and suffixes of Century Classes 400, 500, and 600 as well as the benefactive suffix occur in some, but not all, verbs of this type. Suffixes of Century Class 600 may occur only if the verb is prefixed by members of Century Class 100. 2. IVA=+100+ TA-+ Core+ 400+ 500 + 600/ + 200+ TA+ Core+ 400+ 500 Intransitive verbs of Type A are composed of at least a prefix of either Century Class 100 or Century Class 200 followed by a thematic adjunct and a verb core. They may include, in addition, suffixes of Century Classes 400, 500, or 600. 3. IVB=-+ Core+ 400+ 100+ TA+ 600/ + Core+ 400+ 200+ TA 682-611—6410 88 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Intransitive verbs of Type B are composed of a verb core together with an affix of either Century Class 100 or 200 occurring as a suffix and followed by a thematic adjunct. An affix of Century Class 400 may follow the core and, in forms containing a member of Century Class 100, a suffix of Century Class 600 may follow the thematic adjunct. A complete set of paradigms of transitive verbs in all of their possible inflections includes the following: Primary paradigms.—Transitive verbs in their simplest forms, i.e., those which include only the three obligatory elements and which have unexpanded thematic adjuncts, are members of one of the primary paradigms. A transitive verb primary paradigm is composed of seven or eight forms based on the same verb stem, all belonging to the same mode, and each expressing a different pronominal reference. Examples of these paradigms are given in Appendix 1. The classification of verb stems on the basis of the specific allomorphs of Century Class 100 with which they occur in their primary paradigms is dealt with under ‘‘Verb Classes.”’ Forms with prefixes of Century Class 300.—Transitive verbs occurring with the reflexive-reciprocal or the passive voice prefix take distinc- tive sets of allomorphs of the pronominal prefixes. Furthermore, the class division evident in the primary paradigms is lacking in these forms; all transitive verbs take the same sets of allomorphs. Verbs in the reflexive-reciprocal voice occur with the following set of pronominal allomorphs: $ sk4? ta? k&? n n 101D 102F 103D 104D 105H 106D R § ca? é ska? ca? 111D 112D 113D 114D 115F 116D k4? ka? cA? pa? pa? pa? 121F 122F 123F 124F 125F 126F Those in the passive voice occur with the following: sku sé ti ni ni ni 101J 102H 103B 104E 105A 106A § iS c Z sé Cc 111C 112C 113C 114E 115H 116C é é é pi pi i 121H 122H 123H 124B 125B 126B Verbs in the passive voice regularly take the plural subject suffix: sk-4?4-iztiwa--ne (101J+302A+stem+502A) I was paid An alternative translation of this verb would be they (certain unspec- ified persons) paid me. ‘This translation is consistent with the pres- ence of the plural subject suffix and with the expansion of the thematic adjunct in forms indicating dual or plural persons being acted upon. a Le LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 89 It is not consistent, however, with the presence of pronominal affixes of Decade Classes 1001, 110I, and 1201, which express first, second, and third person subject respectively. The occurrence of allomorph 302B, -a-, as opposed to 302A, -4?a-, is apparently restricted to verbs having a voiceless and unglottalized core-initial consonant and a normally short and level accented thematic adjunct: cidvawa I stabbed him skady4wanr I was stabbed Forms with suffixes of Century Class 400.—Most transitive verb stems may occur with suffix 401, indicating continuous action. These forms occur with the same pronominal prefixes as occur in the primary paradigms: gtkaéanikuya (121A+stem+401B) he ts looking at him Compare: gukaéa (121A+stem) he saw him Subclasses of transitive verbs are based in part on their occurrence with specific allomorphs of 401 (see ‘‘Verb Classes’’). A few transitive verbs are defective in that they never occur with affix 401. The occurrence of affix 402 is quite limited and has been recorded in relatively few verbs. ‘The subclass to which the verb belongs deter- mines which of the several allomorphs occur. There are no occur- rences in the present data of transitive verbs which include affix 403. Forms with suffixes of Century Class 500.—AlII transitive verbs, with the exception of a few defective stems, may occur with a subject number suffix, 501 or 502. In general, the same sets of allomorphs of Century Class 100 occur with these forms as occur in the primary paradigms: gukaéanoti (121A+stem+501B) they two saw him gukaéane (121A+stem+502B) they saw him Compare: gukaéa (121A+stem) he saw him Forms expressing first person subject and third person object, how- ever, are an exception. Verbs which in their primary paradigms occur with A-allomorphs of Decade Class 100 (101A, 102A, 103A, etc.) take allomorphs 101K, 102A, 103H, 104F, 105B, and 106B when the subject is dual or plural. Those with B-allomorphs in their primary paradigms occur with allomorphs 101E, 102B, 103H, 104F, 105B, and 106B in the dual and plural forms: SiukaéanE (101E+stem+502B) we saw him Si-ziwa-nE (101K-+stem+502A) we paid him Compare: sfukaéa (101A+stem) J saw him éi-ziwa (101B+stem) I paid him 90 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The choice of allomorphs of suffixes 501 and 502 depends on the sub- class to which the transitive verb belongs and on the presence or absence of affixes of Century Classes 200 and 400. The occurrence of these allomorphs is described more fully under ‘‘Verb Classes.”’ Forms with suffixes of Century Class 600—Suffixes 601 and 602, in general, may be attached to any transitive verb in the non-future tense. This involves no concomitant changes in the allomorphs of other affixes which are present in the verb: sktiztiwa-ne (161B+stem+601A) when he paid me sktiziwa-nu- (161B-+stem+602) if he pays me Compare: skiiziwa (161B+stem) he paid me Allomorph 601B rather than 601A occurs with verbs in which the subject is dual or plural: sktiztiwa-ne-de (161B-++stem+502A+601B) when they paid me Affix 603 is of much more limited distribution, occurring only in verbs with plural subject in the negative mode when other Century Class 600 suffixes are absent: sgukaéane-te (102A-+stem+502B+603) we (didn’t) see him Forms with prefix 201.—All forms of transitive verbs outlined above, with the exception of those containing suffixes of Century Class 600, may be changed to the future tense by replacing the pronominal prefix with prefix 201. This results in a form of the verb that does not include subject-object person and which must be followed by a verbal auxiliary. ‘Transitive verbs which occur with allomorph 101A in forms indicating first person subject with third person object take allomorph 201B in most future tense forms: sfukaéa (101A+stem) TJ saw him niukaéa (201B+stem) will see Those verbs which occur with allomorph 101B take allomorph 201D: ci-ziwa (101B+stem) TI paid him ni-ziwa (201D+stem) will pay Future tense verbs in the reflexive voice, however, occur with allo- morph 201C rather than 201B or 201D: naukaéa (201C+stem) will see oneself The presence of affix 201 sometimes determines the choice of allo- morphs of suffixes 501 and 502. Some verbs in the future tense take the same allomorph of a number suffix as do the corresponding non- future forms: ni-ziwa-na (201D+stem+501A) will pay (dual subject) Anturop.jaP- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 91 Compare: ai-ziwa-na (121B+stem+501A) they two paid him Verbsoccurring with allomorphs 502A, 502B, or 502C in the non-future tense show a lengthening and voicing of the suffix vowel in the future tense: zi-ziwa-NE (121B+stem+502A) they paid him ni-ziwa-ne- (201D+stem+502A) will pay him (plural subject) Chart 3 summarizes all possible sequences of inflectional affixes representative of the six century classes and illustrates them with examples based on the verb to see. For each of the non-future forms in the chart there are parallel forms representing other modes and other subject-object persons, as well as forms incorporating other affixes of Century Classes 300, 400, 500, and 600. The multiplicity of forms based on a single verb core is further increased by the possibility of changes in the thematic adjunct and/or the inclusion of a benefactive suffix. These, however, are regarded as stem changes rather than inflection and are treated in that portion entitled ‘Stem Formation.” Type A intransitive verbs follow the same general pattern of inflection as transitive verbs, but occur with a more restricted in- ventory or inflectional affixes. These verbs, for example, never occur with affixes of Century Class 100 which express first person object (i.e., Decade Classes 150 and 160). Furthermore, specific intransitive verbs commonly lack the capacity for combining with affixes of one or more of the optionally occurring classes; few intransitive verbs exhibit the full pattern of inflection indicated for transitive verbs in chart 3. Affixes of Century Class 300, for instance, rarely occur with intransitive verbs. There are a few verbs, however, which are classi- fied as intransitive on structural grounds, but which have a transitive meaning and which admit affixes of this class: sk4?AutawA (101J+302A+stem+502G) I was killed Members of Century Classes 400 and/or 500 may likewise be lacking in the inventory of inflectional affixes with which specific Type A intransitive verb stems occur. Certain of these verbs have no distinctive continuative action forms, while others indicate dual and plural subject by changes in the stem rather than by inflection. Type B intransitive verbs are even more restricted in their inflection than are Type A. They never occur with affixes of Century Class 500, and the expression of aspect is limited to the reduplication of the verb core to indicate continuative action (allomorph 401H): wokoka at moved wékowokoka it is shaking [Bull. 191 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 92 fjasmry saas ay fu -nUu-8QgVyN-R-, By 009 +S +00€ + 00T uly saas ay fr -nu-BQVyN-s 009+S+00T SaMasway) aas [JIM =—-ou-"VQaVHN-R-T 00¢+S+00€ +002 sayasmay, mos hay, AU-V2VYN-V-, BH 00¢-+S+00€ + 00T (alqns younjd) aas yim = -eUu-BQVYyN-1U 00S +8 +002 wry os fayg amu-vavyn-3 00$+S+00T fjasauo aas y7Im = VQVYN-8-T S+00€ +002 fJasury MDs ay VQVAN-R-.BY S+00€+00T gas 12M =vQvyN-lU S+002 Uy NDS ay VAVYN-3 S+00T fasauo 70 Buryoo) aq jem VAOYTU-eQVyN-e-T 00% +S +00€ +002 fyasmry 70 Guzyoo) sz ay vANTU-eQVvyN-R-.BH 00% +S +008 + 00T Bburyoo) aq 7m = VAN YIU-eQVvyN-Ju 00F +S +002 uy yo Buryoo) si ay vANYIU-eQvyn-3 00% +S +00T 93 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS Anthrop. Pap. No. 69] sanuanbay way ssp7p fiunjuag—e LAVHO w2y yo buryoo) aup hay, uayn saajas -W9ay} aas fay) uayM = oap--eU-BQVYN-V-, BY 009 + 00S +S +00€ + 00T wy aas fiay2 wayN oap--du-eaVyN-3 009 +00¢+S8+00T saqjasway} yo Buryoo) aun fiayg waym op--as-eANSTuU-eQVyN-v-. By 009 + 00S + 00% +S+00€+00T op--as-vANSIU-vOVYyN-S 009 +-00¢ + 00% +S+001 fasuyy yo “NU-BANSIU-BIV YN-C-, BY 009 + 00% +S+00€ +001 buryoo) 2 ay fr EY nu-vANSIU-eoVyN-3 009+ 00h +S+00T 0 Buzyoo) sz ay fr saqasway} yo butyoo) aq 2M = as-BAnSTU-BQVyN-e-U 00¢ +00%+S+008+002 saajasway? 70 @s-BANSIU-VQV yN-V-. BY 00¢+00F+S+008+00T (qoalqns 7nunjd) Buryoo) aun fiayy buryoo) aq qm as-eAnstu-vgvyn-ju 00S + 00F +8 +002 OLE yo buryoo) asp fiayg as-eknstu-eQvyn-s 00¢+00F+S+00T 94 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 A few Type B intransitive verbs always occur with -n1 in word-final position. This morpheme cannot be assigned a meaning function and does not fit in any of the classes of inflectional affixes: ké-gant it is red ké-sent Iam red There is a tendency for words beginning in g-, k- or k- to develop by analogy a set of inflectional affixes even though the word may not originally have been a verb. This may be seen in the word gasi-k1 cacique borrowed from the Spanish. The initial g- no ionger behaves like a part of the stem but is identified with the third person prefix and may be replaced by other pronominal or future tense affixes: sesi-kr JI am a cacique nesi-k1 will be a cacique Some words have an indicative and a dubitative form but never occur with the future tense prefix or any other inflectional affix: DA a kt-ti mowntain 3 . Cu-ti there may be a mountain The potentiality for occurring with a future tense prefix is taken as a necessary condition for membership in the verb class. Mountain, therefore, is not a verb, but is classified as an uninflected word which exhibits two alternate forms. VERB STEMS Verbs are analyzed as consisting of a stem plus inflectional affixes of the various classes previously described. The stem itself is analyzed as consisting of two obligatory components, a thematic adjunct and a core, and may include a benefactive suffix as well. The combination of these elements to form verb stems is described in the section to follow. Certain verb cores, in turn, may be analyzed further. These will be described under ‘‘Verb Core Derivation.” STEM FORMATION The thematic adjunct (abbreviated TA) is an element of the verb occurring, in most cases, immediately preceding the core (i.e., it is the initial element of the verb stem). The verb zinata he bought it, for example, may be dissected as follows: pronominal prefix Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 95 In those verbs in which the pronominal affix follows the core the thematic adjunct is the element immediately following the pronominal affix: zu-k-u (core+ pronominal affix+TA) he went The stem in such cases, as zi—v in the above example, is discontinuous. Thematic adjuncts occurring in transitive verbs are either simple, indicating singular object, or expanded to indicate dual or plural object. Simple thematic adjuncts in transitive verbs are most commonly single vowels, either short or long: g-ti-ni he knows him dy-u-di you gave it to me é-{--ziwa I paid him A few transitive verbs occur with vowel clusters as simple thematic adjuncts: g-ai-ki-mi I brought it to you $-4u-?0 I gave it to you A particular transitive verb ordinarily retains the same thematic adjunct throughout its primary paradigms (see Appendix 1). Fre- quently, however, there is a different thematic adjunct in the passive voice (see “Stem Variants”’). To indicate dual or plural object, the thematic adjunct of transitive verbs is expanded according to a pattern that is regular but not analyzable in terms of additive morphemes. Chart 4 lists simple transitive thematic adjuncts together with their dual and plural expanded forms. With the simple thematic adjuncts are vowels or vowel clusters which result from a combination of the final vowel of a preceding prefix together with the thematic adjunct. This includes, for instance, -e- resulting from a combination of -i- plus -a- and -au- resulting from a combination of -a- and -u-. Only those vowels and vowel clusters are given which have actually been recorded in transi- tive verbs. This accounts for the omission from the chart of many vowels and vowel combinations that might be expected to occur. Thematic adjuncts and their expansions are listed in the chart by types based on the forms which appear in the primary paradigms and in the passive voice respectively. Type u/a, for example, has refer- ence to verbs which exhibit -u- as thematic adjunct in their primary paradigms and -a- in the passive voice. The expansion of these adjuncts involves a radical change in the accent pattern only in the case of those which in their simple form are short and level accented. These are grouped together in a separate section of the chart. In other verbs the accent of the simple thematic adjunct is retained on 06 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 the final vowel or vowel cluster of the expanded forms, while the initial syllable receives a level accent. Vowel length occurring with a simple thematic adjunct likewise is retained on the final vowel of the expanded forms. Dual Plural Type Simple Expanded Expanded -diya- ~siya- diya -iwa- -duwa- -fuwa- -4°dwa- Short level J -alya- -eiya- -aiyai- -eiyai- -aiyau- -eiyau- -aiya- -alya- -aiya- -U-Wwa- -auwa- -iuwa- -auwa- ~ c o oO o Tas) ca q ~~ 3 o = Yo! = ° oo q — a ee = o > 2 0 a } | -aiwa- -aiwa- -aiwa- Cuart 4.—EHxpansion of Thematic Adjuncts 97 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS Anthrop. Pap. No. 69] way? 02 92 aanb noh 710 Noh 07 92 aanb 7 Sn 07 72 aanb noh gy asam an MOU ey. 119 nok yy T UOURT 24 sn prod noh 110 nok prod 7 way, prod noh Way? 07 70 aaDB T 710 nok 07 7t aanb 7 way? 07 72 7ybN0uQ JT 710 nok 07 7 qybnoug JT Maye aT may? 719 noh payo1y alam an Way? PIyoty ay 110 nok payory J Way? PayIry ay sn qy6nv9 noh 110 nok qybno09 J way? 1y6nv9 noh TPRATES TPRATBS IPEAIG

LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 99 Allomorph -mi correlates in a similar fashion with 502E and 502K; -rhi, correlates with 502D; -dimmi with 502C; and -wi with 502G and 502H: siwanE I went hunting cidya I caught it siwawane’E we went hunting sidva?ta we caught it séwanemi I went hunting for you SAud¥a?dimi TI caught it for you sdudi I planted 244-ba he opened it g4w4-dithr we planted zA?4-tawE they opened it éiudimi I planted for him §4?4-tawi I opened it for you Examples showing a correlation of benefactive suffixes with 502F, 5021, 5023, 5021, 502M, and 502N are lacking in the data. Posi- tionally, the benefactive suffix occurs between suffixes of Century Class 400 and Century Class 500. In forms containing a suffix of Century Class 400 the stem is thus discontinuous: §dukaicrta-ni (141B + TA + verb core + 401E + benefactive suffix, -ni) I am hitting him for you STEM VARIANTS Stem variants result primarily from changes in the thematic adjunct and from changes in the final syllable of the verb stem, although other syllables may occasionally be involved as well. Certain of these changes are irregular and must be indicated in a listing of stems. Others, however, may be predicted on the basis of previously described processes which show a certain degree of regularity. The latter result from specific morphophonemic processes, from the expansion of transi- tive verb thematic adjuncts and the change in the thematic adjunct of intransitive verbs of classes 9-11 and 9-12, (‘Stem Formation’’), and from the suffixation of affix 401E or 502L (“Inflectional Affixes”’). Vowel reduction normally results in the fusing of the thematic adjunct with a preceding vowel. Stem variants will then show either a shift in, or a loss of, the initial (thematic adjunct) vowel, depending on how the prefix-stem cut is made: g-aku (g- + -aku) he bit him $-aku or $a-ku (Sa- + -Aku) I bit you s-éku or sé-ku (si- + -Aku) I bit him The morphophonemic reduction of vowel plus semivowel sequences resuits in similar stem changes: g-iwi-teya (g- + -twt-tEya) he worshiped si-wi-tnya (si- + -twi-tEyAa) I worshiped g-tistkuya (g- + -iwiSikuya) he scolded him si-wiStkuya (si- + -GwiStkuya) I scolded him 100 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Morphophonemic processes involved in suffixation, too, often result in regular stem changes: g-ukaéa (g- + -tkaéa) he saw him g-0kaéa-nikuya (g- + -dkaéa + -nikuya) he is looking at him g-UpE (g- + -upE) he ate g-ubeu-kuya (g- + -upE + -kuya) he is eating s-Gwi-ca (s- + -tiwi-ca) I made it s-wi-ti-ta (s- + -twi-ca + -(i)ta) I am making it Stem variants may result from regular changes which do not involve morphophonemic processes. The most common of these is the expansion of the thematic adjunct to indicate dual or plural object of transitive verbs. This kind of change is regarded as stem change rather than inflection because (1) the changes are of such a nature that no additive morpheme can be isolated, and (2) it parallels in many ways the kind of irregular change which takes place in certain in- transitive verb stems in the dual and plural as compared with the singular forms. The expansion of thematic adjuncts in transitive verbs has been described in ‘Stem Formation” and examples given. The regular change from -au- to -u- in the second person horta- tive forms of Class 9-11 and 9-12 intransitive verbs likewise produces stem variants: s-dudi I planted é-udi plant it The change to -i or -1 of a stem-final -a or -a preceding allomorph -ta of the continuative action suffix and before allomorph -ya of the plural subject suffix was noted in “Inflectional Affixes”’: ef-ziwa (@i- + -f-zGwa) I paid him Ci-ziwi--ta (¢ci- + -fi-ziwa + -ta) Iam paying him Changes which are irregular and which must be indicated in stem listing are of the following types: 1. Changes in intransitive verb stems in the dual and in the plural as compared to the singular—Dual and plural forms of intransitive verbs, except for a relatively few which exhibit stem suppletion, are clearly related to the singular forms. The changes in the stem, however, are highly irregular: g-ama he left g-0-mha they two left z-é6-na they left k-UpE he ate g-d-? abe they two ate g-4-?apE they ate k-Ut4-nica he worked g-Uta-niza-ng g-awataé-niza-nE they two worked they worked an 601» ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 101 Because of this irregularity, intransitive verb stems are listed sep- arately for the singular, dual, and plural. 2. Accentual changes and the alternation between voiced and voiceless vowels in verb stems of the same number.—In some verbs the thematic adjunct alternates from a short accented vowel in most forms to a voiceless vowel in forms prefixed by pronominal morphemes of the shape CVC-: 8-étidya my back gdéc-atidya your back Verbs of this type also may show a shift to a voiceless vowel in the verb core if the core is monosyllabic and normally contains a voiced vowel: $-Adv4 my animal géc-adyA your animal Verb stems which exhibit this type of alternation are listed with the thematic adjunct accent in parentheses: -Atidya back ~“2avd to possess an animal A few verb stems have a distinctive form which occurs only following prefixes composed of a consonant plus -i-. This form of the stem is characterized by a breathy accent on the thematic adjunct and by a final voiceless vowel: sidvya (si- + -idya) JI descended sika (si- + -ika) TI looked gddva (g- + -ddya) he descended zigd (z- + -igd) he looked These stems are listed thus: -fg4 (-ika) to look Some transitive verbs normally characterized by a breathy accent in the thematic adjunct take a level accent in those forms of the primary paradigms in which a vowel cluster results from prefixation: g-tkaéa he saw him si-ukaéa TI saw him Stems that exhibit this type of change are listed with the following notation: -tkata (-vv-) to see A few type B intransitive verbs show a shift from a breathy to a falling accent when the core is followed by -n-: zu-ku he went zQ--ne will go These are listed in the following manner: zu--U (zi-n-) to go £02 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 3. Shifts in the thematic adjunct vowel of transitive verbs in the passive voice.—Some verbs that normally occur with -u- as the thematic adjunct show a shift to -a- in the passive voice: sg-t-kaica he hit me sk4?-4-kaizane I was hit This change cannot be predicted from the phonetic content of the stem nor from its class membership, and is indicated as follows in stem listings: -t-/4-kaica to hit 4. The change from a glottalized to a plain sonorant in the initial stem consonant.—Stems which are based on cores normally beginning with a glottalized sonorant sometimes show a shift to a plain sonorant in forms prefixed by a glottalized consonant. Other verbs, however, retain the glottalized sonorant: s-Uwank you hunted gbz-8-w1 your child é-GwanE hunt k-4-w1 his child Those stems which exhibit this type of change are indicated thus: -tiw/wanE to hunt 5. The lengthening of a stem-final vowel_—In “‘Voicing’’ it was noted that some vowels which are normally voiceless become voiced and long when followed by a suffix. This lengthening is characteristic of some, but not all, stem-final vowels: éf-zawa I paid him cidy4wa I stabbed him Siziwa-NE we paid him cidydwanE we stabbed him Vowels which undergo this type of lengthening are followed by a vowel length symbol in parentheses in stem listings: -{-ziwa(-) to pay 6. The introduction of a glottal stop after the stem-final vowel—Some verb stems are characterized in certain forms by the introduction of a glottal stop following the stem-final vowel. The glottal stop appears regularly, in forms without suffixes, in the negative mode and in the future tense: zidya he caught him ZAzi Zidya? he didn’t catch him nidya? will catch In some of these verbs the glottal stop also appears in all forms containing suffixes, together with the rearticulation of the stem-final vowel if the suffix begins with a sonorant: zidi-Sa he fed him zidi-Sa?-ta he is feeding him zidi-Sa’a-nE they fed him Anthrop.jj 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 103 These verbs are listed thus: -fdi-Sa(?) to feed Other verbs show the glottal stop in word-final position but not in forms containing a suffix: zi-badyu he awoke him ni-bddyu? will awaken zi-badyusa he is awaking him Verbs of this type are listed with the glottal stop in double parentheses: -{-bddyu((?)) to awaken There is at least one verb in the data which contains a final glottal stop in the negative mode and future tense, and retains the glottal stop with vowel rearticulation when followed by a suffix beginning with a sonorant, but which shows a lengthening of the stem-final vowel and no glottal stop when followed by other suffixes: gube he told him gube’e-nn- they told him z&zi gube? he didn’t tell him gtbe--ta he is telling him This verb is listed as follows: -ube(-?) ¢o tell 7. The voicing of a final vowel or vowel-consonant sequence.—The future tense of some verbs is characterized by the voicing of certain segments which are voiceless in other forms. This usually involves vowel clusters or sequences of the type -kuya: Gik ar he lay down sddekuya I did it higai will lie down nédéguya will do These stems are listed in this manner: -ikar (fut. -igai) to lie down -ékuya (fut. -éguya) to do 8. The retention of aspirated stops under conditions 1n which un- aspirated stops normally appear.—Stops which are aspirated preceding voiceless vowels normally become unaspirated if the vowelis voiced. A few stems and suffixes, however, retain aspirated stops in all environ- ments: ZikUPAWA he chopped zikupawanE they chopped Stops which remain aspirated before voiced vowels are underlined in the listing of stems: -ikupawa to chop VERB CORE DERIVATION The verb core is the element which, together with the thematic adjunct, normally comprises the verb stem. The verb core may be a single morpheme and often consists of one or two syllables: -sti to give a liquid -kaca_ to see -pE to eat -tiSa to speak to c4-- to breathe -nata to buy 682—611—-64——-11 104 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Some two-syllable cores and most, if not all, polysyllabic cores show evidence of being derived from simpler forms. However, very few derivational affixes which are still productive can be identified. The majority of polysyllabic verb cores are suspected of being derived for one of the following reasons: (1) They include sequences of phonemes which recur with great frequency in verb cores, although such sequences cannot be correlated with any common semantic feature. For example: a. -WA in -CAYAWA to be angry -78-CUWA to awaken -kUpAWA to chop b. -ya in -wi-tEyA to worship -yucEyA to carry -wACASAYA to stir c. -mI in -witu-nirht to care for -disduwim to be sticky -stid’yinam1 to sweat d. -kuya in -za?anikuya to preach -nikuya to bathe -tikuya to cry -wisikuyA to scold (2) They include sequences of phonemes which occur in two or more semantically related verb cores. For example: a. -stu in -yamnastu to be hungry -pdniustu to be thirsty b. -sta in -sume?esta to teach -cidyusta to ponder (3) They include sequences of phonemes which, if eliminated from the core, would leave a remainder that would itself be a verb core semantically related to the longer form. For example.: a. -cI in -sét-er windpipe; compare sti- to swallow It also recurs in a number of semantically unrelated cores: -sA-bact to pound -sgui-cucr to drool b. -cA in -kfica man’s sister; compare -kui wife -dyumica to learn; compare -d¥im1_ to remember Other cores in which it occurs include the following: -ti-nica to work -wiéd-ca to listen Anthrop.);*2- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 105 c. -cA in -c4yuca to break; compare ¢édyt- to be broken It also recurs in a great many semantically unrelated cores including the following: -pé-ruca tolick -cé-naca to chew -yucidyi-ca to rest d. -tu in -metu to freeze; compare -me’E to be frozen and hAé-mhe- ice -ba?tu to sleep; compare -ba? to be sleepy e. -ta ; in -be-ta toask; compare -be io tell f. -da- in -détécaca tocut; compare -técaca to cut g. -wai- in -wiita to be hot (liquid) ; compare -éa to be hot -waistayA to be cold (liquid); compare -staya_ to be cold VERB CLASSES The primary division in verbs is between transitive and intransitive verbs. ‘Transitive verbs occur with a full set of pronominal affixes (except Decade Class 180 and, in some cases, Decade Class 130) while most intransitive verbs occur with only those of Decade Classes 100, 110, and 120. Some intransitive verbs occur with affixes of Decade Class 140; others occur with Decade Class 180; but none occur with Decade Classes 130, 150, or 160. Certain verbs which are intransitive according to this inflectional definition must be trans- lated by an English transitive expression with a third person object: sauta I killed it The transitive-intransitive dichotomy is thus based on structural and not semantic criteria. TRANSITIVE VERBS Transitive verb stems are classified on the basis of their occurrence with specific allomorphs of inflectional affixes. The most important such classification is based on allomorphs of the pronominal prefixes. While the number of verb classes is considerable, this number is only a small fraction of what theoretically could result from all possible combinations of the many allomorphs of inflectional affixes. There are rather strict limitations on the freedom of distribution of specific allomorphs. Groups of allomorphs rather than individual allomorphs may be viewed as independent units in an examination of the combi- nations which may constitute a complete verb paradigm. Allomorphs of Century Class 100 occurring with transitive verbs may be arranged in two sets of three partial paradigms. These are designated la, 2a, 3a, 1b, 2b, and 3b (chart 5). Each allomorph is listed by its phonemic shape and its reference number. In general, [Bull. 191 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 106 V9GCT VSI VVGL Vésol Val VIGI -1d “1d “1d “

LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 149 CLASS 5-2 INDICATIVE siwi-trya I worshiped stiwi-tEya you worshiped kiwi-teya he worshiped NEGATIVE zazi skiwi-teya I didn’t worship zazi siwi-tEya you didn’t worship zazi kiwi-tEya he didn’t worship DUBITATIVE maybe I worshiped f-tEyA maybe you worshiped j-tEyaA maybe he worshiped CLASS INDICATIVE supE I ate supE you ate kupE he ate NEGATIVE zizi skupE I didn’t eat zizi supE you didn’t eat zizi kupE he didn’t eat DUBITATIVE tupe maybe I ate cupE maybe you ate dyupE maybe he ate HORTATIVE kiwi-teya let me worship cuwi-tEya worship puiwi-trya let him worship NEGATIVE HORTATIVE 2 YA -mi- kiwi-tEya — let me not worship -mi- skiwi-tnya don’t worship -mi- piwi-teya — let him not worship (op (er for > o> o> FUTURE HORTATIVE ba niwi-trya let me worship (in the future) ba ciwi-tEya worship ba puiwi-tpya let him worship 5-8 HORTATIVE kupE let me eat éupE eat pupE let him eat NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-m{- kupE let me not eat -skupE don’t eat ba-mi- pupE let him not eat FUTURE HORTATIVE ba nupE let me eat (in the future) ba cupE eat ba pupE let him eat CLASS 5-9 Class 5-9 is inflected like Class 5-8 except that allomorphs 104G and 105G occur in the first person hortative and negative hortative: nuiwata-nizanE let us work CLASS 5-10 Class 5-10 differs from Classes 5-8 and 5-9 in that it takes allo- morphs 104M and 105M in the first person hortative and negative hortative: oe SutA-nizana let us two work 150 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY INDICATIVE sé-ni J walked si-ni you walked k4-ni he walked NEGATIVE zAziskA-ni I didn’t walk zAzisA-ni you didn’t walk zazi ka-ni he didn’t walk DUBITATIVE té-ni maybe I walked cA-ni maybe you walked cA-ni maybe he walked INDICATIVE saza I said gécaza you said kaza he said NEGATIVE ziziskéza I didn’t say zazi gécaza you didn’t say zZazi kaza he didn’t say DUBITATIVE taza maybe I said dys¢aza maybe you said Aza maybe he said INDICATIVE $a it is mine gdz4 itis yours ka it is his $a you are mine NEGATIVE zazi ska _it isn’t mine ZAzi gdz4i it isn’t yours ZAzi ka ut isn’t his zAzi $a you aren’t mine DUBITATIVE ta maybe tt is mine dvs 74 maybe it is yours ca maybe it is his ¢a maybe you are mine CLASS 6-3 HORTATIVE kA-ni ?4-ni pé-ni let me walk walk let him walk NEGATIVE HORTATIVE bA-mf- ka-ni bA-m{- sk4-ni b4é-mfi- pé-ni let me not walk don’t walk let him not walk FUTURE HORTATIVE ba né-ni ba ¢cAé-ni ba pé-ni walk let him walk CLASS 7-18 HORTATIVE kdza_ let me say Zaza say pdiza_ let him say NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mi- k4za let me not say bé-m{i- skdza_ don’t say bA-mi- pdza let him not say FUTURE HORTATIVE ba naza let me say (in the future) ba d¥écaza_ say ba pdza let him say CLASS 7-15 HORTATIVE na_ let it be mine za let it be yours pa _ let it be his Sa be mine NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mi- na let it not be mine ba-m{- ska let it not be yours ba-mi- pa let it not be his ba-mf- $a don’t be mine FUTURE HORTATIVE ba ha let it be mine (in the future) ba d¥sz4__let it be yours ba pa let it be his ba ¢a be mine [Bull. 191 let me walk (in the future) Anthrop. Pap. No Bot 2 ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 151 CLASS 8—14 INDICATIVE HORTATIVE Stidvasr I fasted ku?tdvasr let me fast guzidvasrt you fasted zud¥asi fast gaudvas1_ _—ihe fasted pdudvasr let him fast NEGATIVE NEGATIVE HORTATIVE bé-mf- ki?tidyasr let me not fast ba-mi- sgéudvasr don’t fast ba-mi- pdéudvasr — let him not fast zAzi sgdudvasr I didn’t fast zZAzi gizidvasi you didn’t fast z4zi gdudyasr ihe didn’t fast DUBITATIVE FUTURE HORTATIVE tu?advasr maybe I fasted ba nudvaksr let me fast (in the future) ba d¥izidvasr fast ba p4ud¥asr let him fast dyuztidyasi maybe you fasted dy4udvasrt maybe he fasted CLASS 9-11 INDICATIVE HORTATIVE sdudi I planted kA?dudi let me plant sdudi you planted é4udi plant k4?4udi_ he planted pa?dudi let him plant NEGATIVE NEGATIVE HORTATIVE zAzi skA?4udi I didn’t plant ba-mi- k4?4udi let me not plant zAzi sdudi you didn’t plant ba-mf- sk4?4udi don’t plant zAzi kA?dudi _ihe didn’t plant bé-mi- pé?4udi let him not plant DUBITATIVE FUTURE HORTATIVE tA?4udi maybe I planted ba n4udi let me plant (in the future) cA?d4udi maybe you planted ba c4?4udi plant G4?4udi maybe he planted ba pé?dudi_ let him plant CLASS 9-12 Class 9-12 verbs differ from those of Class 9-11 in that allomorphs 104N and 105N occur in the first person hortative and negative hortative: S4udimha let us two plant CLASS 10-6 INDICATIVE si-ba?tu I slept Si-ba?tu you slept zi-ba?tu he slept NEGATIVE z4zi sd¥i-ba?tu I didn’t sleep Zizi S{-ba?tu you didn’t sleep zazi 2i-ba?tu he didn’t sleep 682-611—64—_—__14 HORTATIVE kdiba?tu let me sleep ?j-ba?tu sleep pi?i-ba?tu let him sleep NEGATIVE HORTATIVE bé-mi- kdiba?tu —_ let me not sleep bé-mi- sd¥i-ba’tu don’t sleep bé-mf- pi?i-ba?tu let him not sleep 152 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 DUBITATIVE ti-ba’tu maybe I slept ci-ba?tu maybe you slept di-ba?tu maybe he slept FUTURE HORTATIVE ba ni-ba?tu let me sleep (in the future) ba ci-ba?tu sleep ba pi?i-ba?tu let him sleep CLASS 10-7 INDICATIVE éikupawa I chopped Sikupawa you chopped zikupAwa he chopped NEGATIVE zdzi sdvyikupawa I didn’t chop zazi SikupAwA you didn’t chop zAzi zikUpAWA he didn’t chop DUBITATIVE tikupawa maybe I chopped cikupawAa maybe you chopped dikupawa maybe he chopped HORTATIVE kékupawa_ let me chop pikupawa chop pikupawa let him chop NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mi- kékupawa let me not chop ba-mf- sd¥ikupawa don’t chop ba-mi- pikupawA let him not chop FUTURE HORTATIVE ba nikupawa let me chop (in the future) ba cikupawa chop ba pikupawa let him chop CLASS 10-21 INDICATIVE sikupawanE we chopped SikupawanE you all chopped zikupawanE they chopped NEGATIVE zAzi sd¥ikupawanE we didn’t chop zAzi Sikupawane you all didn’t chop zAzi zikupawanE they didn’t chop DUBITATIVE tikupawanE maybe we chopped cikupawank maybe you all chopped dikupawanE maybe he chopped CLASS HORTATIVE nikupawanE let us chop pikupawanE chop (you all) pikupawanE let them chop NEGATIVE HORTATIVE bé-mf- nikupawanE let us not chop ba-mi- sd¥ikupawanE don’t chop (you all) b4-mi- pikupawanE let them not chop FUTURE HORTATIVE ba nikupawanE let us chop (in the future) ba cikupawanE chop (you all) ba pikupawankE let them chop 10—22 Class 10-22 verbs are inflected like those of Class 10-21 except that allomorphs 104P and 105P occur in the first person hortative and negative hortative: stikupawana let us two chop set 2 ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 153 CLASS 11-25 INDICATIVE sédéku we went gddéku you all went zekU they went NEGATIVE zizi sdyeku we didn’t go zizi gsdeku you all didn’t go Zizi zekU they didn’t go DUBITATIVE tédeku maybe we went dyidéku maybe you all went déku maybe they went HORTATIVE nédéku let us go déku go (you all) peku let them go NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mf- néddéku — let us not go ba-mf-sdyéku don’t go (you all) ba-m{i- péeku let them not go FUTURE HORTATIVE ba nédéku _ let us go (in the future) ba dvidéku go (you all) ba péku let them go CLASS 11-26 Class 11-26 verbs differ from those of Class 11-25 in that they occur with allomorphs 1040 and 1050 in the first person hortative and negative hortative: sté?éyu let us two go CLASS 12-27 INDICATIVE sgd-nawant J am mean gdzi-nawanl you are mean cA-nawant he is mean NEGATIVE Zazi scA-nawanl I am not mean zazi gdzA-nawanl you are not mean zAzi CA-nawanl he is not mean DUBITATIVE tézA-nawant maybe I am mean dyézA-nawanl maybe you are mean H A ’ . ta-nawanl maybe he is mean HORTATIVE nézAi-nawant let me be mean zA-nawanl be mean 9A .J . pé-nawanl let him be mean NEGATIVE HORTATIVE fs , -ndézA-nawant let me not be mean scA-nawanl don’t be mean pé-nawanl let him not be mean FUTURE HORTATIVE let me be mean (in the future) ba d¥dz4-nawant be mean ba pé-nawant let him be mean ba néza-nawanl CLASS 18-28 INDICATIVE sktikar J lay down gddikar you lay down CikAI he lay down NEGATIVE ziziséikat ‘I didn’t lie down zazi gddikat you didn’t lie down ZAzi Cik al he didn’t lie down HORTATIVE nédikat let me lie down dik al lie down pikal let him lie down NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mi- nédik ar let me not lie down ba-m{- scikar don’t lie down ba-mf- pikar let him not lie down 154 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 DUBITATIVE tédikat maybe I lay down dvidikat maybe you lay down tik aI maybe he lay down INDICATIVE si-ca I didit Si-ca you did it ci-cA he did it NEGATIVE zazi sti-ca TI didn’t do it zizi Si-cA = you didn’t do it zazi ci-cA he didn’t do tt DUBITATIVE ti-ca maybe I did it ci-cA maybe you did it ti-cA maybe he did it INDICATIVE St-za-nE we did it Si-za-nE you all did it ei-za-nE they did it NEGATIVE zAzi sti-za-nE we didn’t do it z4zi St-za-nhe you all didn’t do tt zAzi ci-za-nE they didn’t do it DUBITATIVE ti?i-za-nn maybe we did it ci-za-nE maybe you all did it ti-za-nE maybe they did it FUTURE HORTATIVE ba nédikar let me lie down (in the CLASS 14-4 future) ba d¥idikart lie down ba pikar let him lie down HORTATIVE kaica let me do it pi-ca = do ttt pi?i-ca let him do it NEGATIVE HORTATIVE bA-m{f- kAica —_ let me not do it bé-mf- séi-ca don’t do it ba-mf- pi?i-ca let him not do it FUTURE HORTATIVE ba ni-ca let me do it (in the future) ba ct-ca do it ba pi?i-ca let him do it CLASS 14-19 HORTATIVE ni-za-ne let us do it pi-za-nE ~— do it (you all) pi?i-za-ne let them do itt NEGATIVE HORTATIVE ba-mfi- ni-za-nE let us not do it b4é-mf- séi-za-ne don’t do it (you all) bé-mf- pi?i-za-ne let them not do it FUTURE HORTATIVE ba ni-za-neE let us do it (in the future) ba cf-za-nE do it (you all) ba pi?i-za-ne let them do it CLASS 14-20 Class 14-20 verbs differ from those of Class 14-19 in that they take allomorphs 104Q and 105Q in the first person hortative and negative hortative: sti-za-na let us two do it APPENDIX 2. TEXT’ D P S D —oemr- SO ——@-@-—— > di*ai' su ?e hau?? da?4ér1? sandiyé-ku‘/ ?ai su ?e su ha-di® there near he arrived St. James where Ss ii P C Gi-na° d¥5-ta-ma’ / z4zi®?ite® dara! / su ?e ta}! river it is full not able to he crosses thus P D O su Cuidé.?anikuya!? dtké.!* d¥i! / su ?eu su sdézanadisd’ use he was asking that way up Our Father P I D O euida-?anikuya!? / giwa-' ?éza” diké- ku'® éfer® 93-t4-ma” he was asking how at least that way south water it is full iP A D O niuma”’ gink?? / ?e su ?e yusi?? no% eu d %4-mi%® will cross he from there down eagle D P D iP ?eu su ?e yuisi2? no% tagtiyanE?’ / su ?e hau?? diuwaéér?? / from there down he was sent near he approached P I fragment P sl ald a Se ee SS su e ?e dacikuya” / zi*° haidi#! yu-32 / ha.?* / d¥éineta** / Seip a2/ he said to him what which maybe _ yes he said I need you I iP A fragment ig S Fu niud’a-wa?® cu” / su %e hé-mé-* / d’éineba®™ Peud’4.mi* / maybe will be of use you all right he said eagle fragment iP D A D gu %e hind” ?égu” / nddéreyu" disi®ku® sazi.?0® /ha-di® O.K. then will go there south we two where S D P A 5 SE ee ee ee ee hicé-nti“ d’&-trha*® / ?eu ?ai hau?? nddé?éyu*! stizu-?u* / gasi-k1* giant his home near will go we two king O BP P A his wife he lost look for we her 7 Superior numbers in Indian text are explained on pages 163-164. 155 156 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 S P fragment P —_—_—_—_—_—————“_ K——w ——— -_eaoeorreereeeee™ su ?e ?eu d’4-mi%® ?e Gaza! / hina® / d¥éineta * / eagle he said OK: he said fragment D F D 2 ra >? : : y» , . . su ?e diwé. » ?écu “ su / 8étid¥a © ?ai d%i!* Gigtya */ su ?e ?ai di 4 this way then my back up sit up P S D P —_ —-_—~ ee EE giya © eu % sandiya-ku */ su ?e disi* ku’® su ?esu d’a?aiyu * / e sat St. James there south they flew D EF D Pp ——_—_. —_—____.. oo Sa EEnEnEEEEEEE EEE su’e di dé?éyu / su ?ed%i *ha-di® su dé?é-ya?atank ® / up they went up where they were going EP D S su ?e su d’tkaéa © / ai ho %t ?eu > =4?4-sti-ca © hicd-nti “ / he saw it down his city giant P S O ik = A , , J, 2 ¥ su ?e su d’ukaéa * /su ?e Gécr *! su hiegd-ntr** d’4-mi*® GAd¥4-Se ® / he saw it also giant eagle his P D P | oe an su ?e su 4?4ud’u ®& /su ?e sud’ * digd-nikuya * he knew up he was looking S ) EERIE ev — — ah Oo éécr © hicgd-ntr * CAd’4-Se © / su ?e su ?eu hicé-nti * CAd%A-Se ©? d¥A-mi 26 also giant his giant his eagle P S iP P U s A vs 2 pe 9 su ?e d’ti-scéca © / gu ?e hicd-ntr* é4ka4- © / su ?e d%ima he cried out giant he heard he came out S O P fragment —SSS—yEZ OO eee ———_ hicd-nti “ su ?e ?eudu™ d’4-mi% %e ta?4neyawa © / hina * ?éeu * / giant this eagle he was commanded O.K. then P P S D (SSS SS eee eee Ss eae _——. ét-wasi °° / su ?e GA?Auwasi 7 ?eu d¥4-mi 2° / su ?e su hau? ? attack he attacked eagle near Ant %o1 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 157 P P S su da?Atinu- 7 / ?ai su GAwaéinrya 7 / ?e su ?eu sandiyé-ku * he arrived they fought St. James O iP hisgai 7? d¥auéu % / knife he had ?eu su ’e su hé-ya-si su ?e ?eu du hieaé-nti éad’A-Se-Si did’awa/di?ai with it this giant his (eagle) he stabbed there su %e su ¢A?Audapa-d’anu / su %e yiwé- no su ?e d¥t-za-Ga ?eu du they killed him this way down he fell this hicd-ntr d’4-mi é4d¥4-Se / su ?e ?Aisi su ?e su dé?éyu / su ?e su giant eagle his there they went ha-di no yuiwé- su ?e nddé?éyu ?eu ?ai hé-di hicd-ntr d’4-ma where down this way will go where giant he dwells sca?a-sti-ca / Aisi d¥A-ma / su ?e ?ai Bendé-na d’4wizanisu / ?eu city there he dwells window he was there Aisi d¥i d’4-mi su ?e Gigtiya / su %e ?eu sandiydé-ku éécr su yiku there up eagle he sat St. James also away ne éigtyanu: / su ?e ?aisi d¥1 éigtiya / su ?e ?eu du sandiya-ku down he sat there up he sat this St. James d¥a-mi hawé. tiyt-zé-yanz ?e dacrkuya / disi ba Giyt-kam1/ eagle this way he lead he said to him here future wait for me hané duké- kaigé / su ?e hind d¥éineta %eu d¥A-mi / let me there look O.K. he said eagle su ?e yuké- su ?e hawé- sa digd-nikuya ?eu sandiyé-ku / yuké. that way this way around he looked St. James that way hawé: digé-nikuya / hawé- pend4-na sa no Cinésa / su ?e zAzi this way he looked this way window around down he peered not ite d’tbonu- / ?égasku ?eu sai d4?4-?a zi Githasééica-Si / ?eu able to be entered _— but all itis shut thing iron with su ?e ta su ?e ?eu ?ai hé-di / hau? da?4ér ?eu ?ai hé-di é4ukui-sanu thus where near he came where his wife gasi-k1 ?ai d’aku / su ?e ?eu d¥4-Se ?e su %e disaca / su 7e king she was her name he called 158 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 éaiskd-?acar ?eu gasi-ki Géukui-sanu / he d¥éineta / su ?e ?eu she turned king his wife what she said sdiyéiba-te hisu / gdz4-26 ?eu sktiyanikuya diwé- si ?tidf-ye / I look for you you your husband he told me this way back to get su ?e %e d¥éineta / ?eu he / ?égu giwa- sa nfurna si / hied-nt1 she said allright then how back will I giant get out 74?4-tawr yuké- yu? ha-di d’aku / ?eu nu- k4?4-tnya / key that way there where it is only he has zazi hinu ska?4-tnya / giwa- ?écu sa nizi-mha / su ?e ?eu gastf-kr will get out cAukui-sanu ?e ¢4za / diwai dtisi né?ét1 gu ktimi hacu magu/ not I I have how then back king his wife she said this way wilicome he in a little while hayéi ba h4-di Géisguihasga / disi z4?Atinu- / ?e su ha-winda naud’u somewhere there future hide back he arrives right away will know gu / su %e hina d¥éineta / su ?e ?eu si yuku zud’u su yuirai ha-di he O.K. he said back away he went there somewhere éhisgurhaga / su %e su diwé- su si Ga-niéad’aya / ?ésgasku no ka’anu-/ he hid this way back he was coming but down he stepped su ?e su ha?aéi- wékowokod’a/su ?emi su ¢&?4ud’u/mmm d*¥éineta/ earth it shook already he knew he said hau di? zi gaku / d¥éineta ?eu hicd-nti / su %e ?eu gast-k1 who here thing he is he said giant king éAukui-sanu ?e éAza / zizi ha-di hau gaku gu z4zi ha-di hau his wife she said not somewhere who he is and not somewhere who ska?atiSaniguyang-di / su %e ?eu gasi-kr CAukui-sanu hiea-nti we talk to each other king his wife giant ?e dactkuya / m{i-n4 $4sbanasurhanu- / yu- d’idiéayurha / she said to him let me I wash your head maybe you are tired mi-n4 $4sbanasumanu- /su ?eyu: mé?é- nuyucid’i-ca cu rawa: / let me I wash your head maybe thus will rest you good gu ni-ba?tu cu / su ?e hind ?égu / d¥éineta ?eu hicé-nti / su ?e ?eu su and will sleep you O.K. then he said giant AO? ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 159 ¢a?auwispa-ziwita ?ai du gast-kr é4ukui-sanu / su ?e su haiku su she made suds this king his wife when ta?4sbanasumane / eu du hicé-ntr ?eu t&?A4sba nasurhane / his head was washed this giant his head was washed su ?e su di-ba?tu / su ?e ?eu du gasi-k1 éAukui-sanu su ?e ?eu he slept this giant his wife d’tbéuca sandiya-ku / diwé- su gaiti si ?i-ma / su zi-ba?tu / su ?e she called St. James this way come on back come _he sleeps ?eu ?ai su ?e diube-ta / su ?eu yiké- ki-ti ?e zupe- / yu?4i ha-di she told him there mountain go there where d*i ?eu d’4wA:-?a / ?4isi c4-cad’a ?eu / gu ?eu ?4isi d’4winuska-ti / up he kept them there he breathes and there his hearts d’A-mi- ?4isi d’4winuska-t1 / du ?iska ?eu hé-y4 c4-ca-d¥ani / two there his hearts this one with it he breathes gu du Viska ?eu hé-¥a tiSa-ti-36 / su ?e ?eu ta ?ai ta?abe?enk and this one with it he has power thus he was told ?eu du sandiyé-ku / du d’ast-k1 Géukui-sanu ?e taza / ?ésgasku ?ai this St. James this king his wife she said but there giuku mi-Kaica / ?ai ¢A-nawani mid’u- / eu ?ai gtiwa-sd’u / su ?e ?eu he has mountain lion heis mean very there he watches sandiyaé-ku ?e t4za /hé-mé- ?ezi-ne si/su?e sa d°tirhonu- / St. James he said all right will go I back he left su ?e ?ai su ?e su ?eu d’4-mi tiyti-zé-yane /?ai su %e ¢A7Atisaniguyanda / eagle he lead they talked together su ?e ?e dactkuya d4-mi/diwé- ?égu su na su sté?éyu/su’e sa he said to himeagle _ this way then let’s go let’s go back d’i éigtyanu- / su ?e *Aisi yuké. d’a?Aiyu yurai haé-di ?eu du-ti / up ihe sat there that way they flew there where mountain su ?eha-dinoziyé- bono éigtyana di?-d’anu su %e su / ?ésgasku where down below west down they sat here but su ?e emi di-yikaéa kau? zi md-Kaica / su ?emi di-yikaéa / mountain already he saw them something already he saw them lion su ?e su ?ai su yuku no étegtiya ?eu sandiyé-ku / su ?e ?Aisf ha- away down he sat St. James from there east 160 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 ni-yu- ka-ni/?e zud’u/su ?e su d%ukaéa ?eumdt-kaica/ hau? su ha-ni himself he walked he went hesaw him mountain lion near from the east éa-nigad’aya / su eu yu? zi kiéayawane mhe- / ka hazanz di g?astiné he was walking there thing he was mad like his hair up it stood ?e su 2e/hawé- d-ni/su?e su ?emi sandiyaé-ku ééci su ha-ku d’A4wiza-n1 this he walked already St. James also ready he had way prepared hisgai-si / su ?e ?isgawa ?ai su ?e su ¢ud%ad*r / su ?e ?eu diube?ene knife both they fought she told him du gasi-k1 édukui-sanu ?eu ?Aisf d’d-mf- eawinuska-ti-8é / ?e su %e this king his wife there two his hearts su ?e CA?audanu- mi-kaica / ?ai su ?e d¥i Gutika-Sa / su ?e ?ai he killed it mountain lion up he climbed d’i-?tkaca ?eu nawirika hawé- di d’4?aku / ?ai su ?e ?iska he saw them eggs this way up they sat one éa?aucayuca gu 7iska ¢4?4uboanaimanu- / su ?e yusi no zud’u / he broke it and one he put in his pocket from there down he went ee su ?e ?ai hausé da?Aér/ eu ?ai ha-disi diyti-kam1/ d%4-mi hé-ya back he arrived where back he waited eagle with it éa-niéadYayane / su ?4isi sa d’i éigtyanu- / su %e su ytsi dé?dyu / he was going there back up he sat from there they went ?ésgosku su ?emi yu? ?e gtiwa- gast-kr GAukui diube?ene / su ?emi but already there how king his wife she told him already hicé-nti su diwa-sa yu? ?e / su ?e haus4 da?4ér / ?ai su ?e no giant he was sick there back he arrived down éigtiyanu- su ?e su / su éécr diyt-kami gasi-ki Géukui-sanu / su %e he sat also she waited king his wife hausé da?A¢inu: / su ?e su diubéuca su ?e / su gaitr diwé- ?tipa / back he arrived she called him come on this way enter dacikuya / su gaiti ha-né / ?a si ciytce/ ha. d¥éineta / she said to him come on question back you brought yes he said si ¢iyice / hawi- / su ?e ?ai ta?Audi?-d¥anu / su ?e ytiké- ?eu back I brought here it was given there ?iscawa ?e dé?éyu su / su diwa-sa / su ?e su ?e dacikuya / both they went he was sick he said to him di sanasgai ®e pt-ca / dacikuya /su ?e ta d*i __ ti-zane / gu ?e up your head do it he said to him thus up he did An G9] °2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 161 ?ai no dustadrca ?eu / su ?e Pai ta?4mud’uzane ?eu du hicd-nt1/ down he burst he was killed this giant su ?e su gasi-kr éAukui-sanu gu sandiy4é-ku su yuwé- / su ?e ?Aisi king his wife and St. James this way there d‘i ?isgawa Gigtiyanodi--d’anu / su ?e ?4isi sa déku ha-di gasi-k1 up both they sat there back they went were king d¥a-tha / su ?e sandiyé-ku kamaka gast-kr tiwakuica / haidf he lived St. James his daughter king he married which one gast-kr diya-?ani-8é / ta yupé- sca / king he promised thus story FREE TRANSLATION St. James arrived at the ocean and was not able to cross. So he asked God how he might cross the ocean. Then an eagle was sent down from above. The eagle approached and said, ‘‘What is it?” ‘‘Yes,” he said, “I need you. Maybe you will be of use.” ‘‘All right,” said the eagle. “O.K., then, we will go south to the giant’s house. The king lost his wife. We are going to look for her.” ‘O.K.,’” said the eagle, “come sit on my back.” Then St. James got on. Then they flew south and up they went. As they were flying up there they saw the giant’s city down below. The giant also had an eagle and he knew what was happening. The giant’s eagle looked up and cried out. Then the giant heard and came out. “O.K., attack!’, he commanded his eagle. So the eagle attacked. When he came near they began fighting. St. James had a knife and with it stabbed the giant’s eagle. They killed the giant’s eagle and down he fell! Then they went down to the city where the giant lived. The eagle perched on the window of the giant’s house and St. James got off and sat down. Then St. James said to the eagle who had taken him there, ‘‘Wait for me here. Let me look around.” “O.K.,” said the eagle. So St. James looked around this way and that. He peered through the window but he could not get in. It was shut with iron bars. Then he came to where the king’s wife was. He called her name and she turned around. ‘What is it?” she said. ‘I’m looking for you. 162 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Your husband told me to come and get you.” “All right,” she said, “but how will I get out? The giant has the only key somewhere. I don’t have any. How will we get out, then? He will come back in a little while. Hide somewhere. When he comes back he will know right away what is going on.” ‘O.K.,” he said, and he went and hid somewhere. ‘The giant was coming back and as he stepped the earth shook. He already knew, and he said, ‘Hmmm! Who is here?” Then the king’s wife said, ‘“Nobody is here and there is nobody talking with me.” The king’s wife then said to the giant ‘Let me wash your head. Maybe you are tired. Let me wash your head and then maybe you will rest well and go to sleep.” ‘“O.K., then,” said the giant. Then the King’s wife made suds. When his head was washed the giant went to sleep. Then the king’s wife called to St. James, ‘Come here; he is asleep.”” Then she told him, “Go to the mountains. He keeps them there. There he breathes and there he has his two hearts. He breathes with one, and with one he has power.” Thus it was told to St. James. The king’s wife said, “But he has a mountain lion there watching who is very mean.” Then St. James said, ‘All right, I’ll go.” So he left and talked with the eagle who had led him. Then the eagle said to him, ‘Come on, let’s go.”” So he got back on and they flew away to the moun- tains. Then they landed down on the west side, but the mountain lion had already seen them. Then St. James got off and walked on eastward alone. The moun- tain lion saw him and approached from the east. He was mad and his hair stood up ashe approached. St. James had his knife ready and the two of them fought. The king’s wife had told him where the two hearts were, so he killed the mountain lion and climbed up. He saw two eggs sitting there. Then he broke one of them, put one in his pocket and climbed back down. Then he arrived back where the eagle was waiting. He got back on and from there they returned according to the instructions of the king’s wife. The giant was already sick when he got back and dismounted. The king’s wife, too, was waiting. ‘Come on in,” she called to him, “did you bring it back?” ‘‘Yes,” he said, “‘here it is.” And he gave it to her. Then they both went to the sick one. He said to him, “Lift up your head.” Then he lifted it up and burst. So the giant was killed. Then the king’s wife and St. James got on the eagle and they went back to the king’s house. And St. James married the king’s daughter that he had promised to him. That is the story. An oRoT » LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 163 CONAaARWHe EXPLANATION OF NUMBERS IN TEXT . Preposition, there. . Preposition, near. Verb, he arrived. Affix 123G + stem, -4?4ér1. . Referential, St. James. From Spanish Santiago. . Preposition, where, somewhere. . Referential, river. Verb, it is full. Affix 123A + stem, -6-t4 + affix 403. Modal, not. . Modal, able to. . Verb, he emerged or, in this context, he crosses over. Affix 123A + stem, -tirha. . Connective, thus. . Verb, he was asking. Affix 123C + stem, -tidd-?a + affix 401B. . Preposition, that way. . Directional, up. . Verb, our father. Affix 101G + stem, -dnaisd¥u + affix 5011. . Interrogative, how? . Modal, at least. . Directional, south. . Referential, water. . Verb, it is full. Same as 7 but with affix 121A instead of 123A. . Verb, will emerge or cross over. Same as 10 but with affix 201B instead of 123A. . Verbal auxiliary, third person subject with condition suffix. . Preposition, from there, from afar. . Directional, down. . Particle which in certain contexts adds emphasis to other words. . Referential, eagle. . Verb, he was sent. Affix 123H + affix 302B + stem, -dguya + affix 502A. . Verb, he approached. Affix 123B + stem, -twéer. . Verb, he said to him. Affix 123G + stem, -acikuya. . Interrogative, what? . Interrogative, which? . Modal, maybe. . Exclamation, yes. . Verb, he said. Affix 123A + stem, -diheta. . Verb, I need you. Affix 141B + stem, -féfpa. . Verb, will be of use. Affix 201B + stem, -tid¥4-wa?. . Verbal auxiliary, second person subject. . Exclamation, all right, that will do. . Exclamation, O.K. . In some contexts a connective; here part of an exclamatory phrase. . Verb, will go (dual subject). Affix 201G + stem, -é?éyuv. . Preposition, there. . Verbal auxiliary, first person dual subject. . Referential, giant. From Spanish gigante. . Verb, he lives, his house. Affix 123A + stem, -4-mha. . Referential, king. From Spanish cacique. May be alternatively analyzed as a verb consisting of affix 121A + stem, -asi-k1. . Verb, his wife. Affix 121D + stem, -Aukui. . Particle which modifies meaning of following verb. . Verb, he did it, or, in this context with the particle tu, he lost. Affix 121G + stem, -fwicA. 164 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull 19% . Verb, will look for (dual subject). Affix 201D + stem, -fyéipa + affix 501B. . Verb, he said. Affix 123D + stem, -4za. . Preposition, this way. . Verb, my back. Affix 101E + stem, -dtidya. . Verb, sit (imperative). Affix 114D + stem, -tigtya. . Verb, he sat. Same as 54 but with affix 123C instead of 114D. . Verb, they two flew. Affix 123A + stem, -4?diyu. . Verb, they two went. Same as 41 but with affix 123G instead of 201G. . Verb, they were going. Affix 123G + stem, -é?é-ya?ata + affix 402B. . Verb, he saw him (or zt). Affix 123A + stem, -tkaéa. . Verb, his city. Affix 123D + stem, -4?4-sti-ca. . Particle, also. . Verb, his (referring to a living animal). Affix 123D + stem, -dd¥4-Se. . Verb, he knew. Affix 123F + stem, -d4udyv. . Verb, he was looking. Affix 123G + stem, -fg4 + affix 401B. . Verb, he cried out. Affix 123A + stem, -t-sééca. . Verb, he heard. Affix 123C + stem, -dké-. . Pronoun, this one. . Verb, he was commanded. Affix 123H + affix 302A + stem, -4nnya + affix 502G. . Verb, attack (imperative). Affix 114D + stem, -Auwast. . Verb, he attacked. Same as 69, but with affix 123F rather than 114D . Verb, he arrived. Affix 123G + stem, -a?d¢r + affix 602. . Verb, they fought. Affix 123C + stem, -Awdin1ya. . Referential, knife. . Verb, he had. Affix 123A + stem, -duév. PSO US ie as aie ngs oe cae APPENDIX 3. VOCABULARY UNINFLECTED WORDS ?a interrogative particle Pai there ?sitdstr mattress, mat Gini house ?Adausi cooking pot ?4-dy¥4-n1 tether ?4ugubd?akacr nail ?4ndmati seat °fndizint lamp ?ané- tasty ?4-sh large bowl ?disi there ?distazini trousers ?Asini grass ?4sdni wheat 7474-tdwi key ?4-wé-nt grinding stone, metate ?e and eu narrative particle and em- phasizer ?égu_ then, therefore emi already ?ésgasku but ?ibAnt Cholla cactus ?{-84ndnt bark *idyawa_ centipede %j-kani vine *{?fnd-ni liver *indwi flour ?isa manure ‘isdiwa arrow ?isgawa both ?iska one ?isd-ni meat ?isd porcupine Yisatr lard ite able to ?jya-ni_ life ?t-basdy4ni legging °abéwi food °a-bd-nd& needle ?i-didyawistr saddle °Ggupdwanl az 43. 44, 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. Qe 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. Oks 78. (9. 80. Si. 82. 83. 84. *Gki-ydthr earring ?u-kdydwi towel, handkerchief ?a-ma4 ?a-mt ?U-siw -c1_ help, asst. ‘cI gun isdyAni rope ?i-skdicr bell usd-cA sun ?u-t4-nt basket ?uwaka baby, doll ?Gwdistdnt bowl ?t-wis ?aydumbuimer gict match ?agusti drill ?Srd- hot (in reference to the weather) ba future hortative particle bi-ba bati grandparent whitewash bé-raka toad bisi-nd purple bi-su biya- cAcl cécl cé-ya cina cuski SA cA- pi bee stance drum tilted, lopsided bimt-na torso, rib bi-raika butterfly bizuwist1 lightnin bo west; bdndmi bézd-mha log breath wall jirst turkey fox fly ¢é-bén4__ bitter OQ: O- Or a Cisdi?i éiyduzani é4-dva é4m4 Gécl D WASCA stew fel water, juice f LY A: x} cimastéica iron ni honey side tomorrow also s g westward adobe brick 165 BUREAU OF AMERICAN éémr three; éémiya three times 138. Cind river 139. éAndrhr bat 140. édyA-ni shaman 141. &-riga hawk 142. dabénuska horned toad 143. da-ni squash, pumpkin 144. dapacl corpse 145. da4waca moon, month 146. désu place 147. di? here 148. di?4i there 149. disi from here 150. di-skim4& cornhusk 151. diya dog 152. du_ this, this one 1/593} duké- that way 154, dtiwimrs1 stocking 155. diwé-. this way 156. dyé-dyu bobcat 157. dy4-mi eagle 158. dva-na four 159. dya4na jackrabbit 160. dyainé deer 161. dydwa_ early 162. dv4-wi gourd 163. dv4ya’ani pifion nut 164. dyéiclI pifion pine 165. dvi up 166. dyidya north 167. dyini above 168. dyti-bi badger 169. dyi-m{i- two 170. dyims brother ileal dvi-ya twice 172: dyd-sa_ elk 173. gdnami beans 174. gdisbisa world 175. gasgduga quail 176. gawict seed Wide ga-yu morning 178. gu and 179. gu? for, therefore 180. gQ-?u- beaver 181. guci firewood 182. guhdya bear 183. gukumist eight 184. gumds4w4 cooking pot 185. giwa- how 186. giydsti basket 187. ha- east; h4-ndmi eastward 188. hai where (destination) 189. hau who, someone 190. ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 hau? near, suddenly hauba- everybody habént oak ha-bi feather hdé?4er, ha?dci- land, earth hdééu how much, how many, few ha?déanani tooth hdéeaecE man haéddwini navel ha-di where, somewhere hdidi which, what hadvani soapweed ha-ka-ka fir héikémi once ha-ka-ni fire, hot coals haké- that way ha-ku ready héiku when hé-ma-ni_ leg, thigh ha-mi tobacco hé-miiéuni toe hd-mtSa-ni beard hdma- long ago h4-ma-ni, ha-rha?ani hail hdémasdi?ini hand, finger haé-me- ice hand-mi naked ha-ni- pine hdinu people hé-né hortative particle hasé4 yucca hdsdi?ini foot hasgeni bone hé?4-sti-ca town, city h4-Suwitht shoe, moccasin hé-tawe pollen hdwe- snow hawizana stalk hd4wdi_ there héwé- this way hawi- here, take it ha?4wi-édnani claw, fingernail hd-wind quickly, immediately hdyaét awl hayéi there haé-zaint hair hé-zoni onion he_ that one hé-mé- all right, enough hénatr cloud héyady1_ turtle héyas1 fog, mist hé-y4 with (instrumental) AOR, 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS tor 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. 211. 212. 213. 214. 215. 216. dt fe 218. 219. 220. 221. 222. 223. 224. 225. 226. 227. 228. 229. 230. 231. 232. 233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 242. hinu I, we hind all right hi-séi sunflower hisgai knife histiya-ni arrowhead, spearhead hisu. you hiw4 now, today hiyaka-¢n domestic animal hiyA-ni road, path hfy4-wi doorway, road hizd?ai tree, cottonwood hi-zani seed hu-bdént saliva hi-?tga dove huséni wool haskani yucca fruit, banana htisd-cr cotton hiwaka sky hiwan4?ani hiwi-ni milk hécuskdwa willow kddya_ behind; kAdyAmé4- back- ward eye kdsAitl summer, year kaé-tid’¥4 clean, pure kindti green corn kiwd plant ku south; kiwdmi southward ki-ka winter kipéstuca lightning ktiiwe-?5 sweet kéd-cr antelope k4cr_ ten kducrgai maybe kaka-d¥1 square, plaza k4kana wolf k4maska spider kdnt cedar k4nani heat of sun k4sdv4-é1 rainbow k4wina moss ku., kiwi woman, female kimi slightly, a small amount ktisa last night ku-ti, &4-ti mountain ki-yéu old woman kuyaitz game animal mai almost mags- girl m4é-nu- a long time méréu tortilla masa-ni leaf masa light 682-—611—64——_15 243. 244. 245. 246. 247. 248. 249. 250. 251. 252. 253. 254. 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268. 269. 270. 271. 272. 273. 274. 275. 276. 277. 278. 279. 280. 281. 282. 283. 284. 285. 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. 291. 292. 293. 294. miéyuku nine muséica buffalo must soapweed midyu- very mi-n4 hortative particle mi-kaica mountain lion mé-dé- boy m4°sei blood madai ball maidvana seven magorr_ evil thika dipper m4-n{i word rhd-34w1 buzzard the- like, similar to mé-wa mud mé-ziér large mi-cr clay mi-ca hummingbird mid& moth mi-ga others mina salt thiséai ashes mistr alkali na yet nace- new naei food, lunch nawadiya middle-aged nd-y4i under néizi thank you (women’s speech) nu: only, itself nt-bada alone nuwdindg separate niya night nti-yui- oneself nd-’éea rubber néti prairie dog nau many hAwirika egg no down panaci lung pa-ni bag pesécuru bedbug pésa jackrabbit péti-n4 cornmeal pict buckskin pi-nu- fancy, fine piraté flag pisé4nani skin, hide rawad:- good rédya rabbit r{-pA goose 167 168 295. 296. 297. 298. 299. 300. 301. 302. 303. 304. 305. 306. 307. 308. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321. 322. 323. 324, 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. 330. dal. 332. 333. 334. 330. 336. 337. 338. 339. 340. 341. 342. 343. 344, 345. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY ri-wagant fat ré-skisr small sa back, return to previous location sai_ all sai¢éu day sd-wika money, metal seka sure si again, return to present location si-?{ ant si-dya squirrel sinani flesh siyana mouse siwd yesterday sdcI wrongdoing séna middle sbiga woodpecker sbi-ndé chicken sbi-n4é jug stéi_ last sté-né meadowlark staépaka twilight stéti grasshopper st4w4 popcorn stizd- fast stité crow stisa siz stimu wild honey stiyt-n4 mosquito stizuwi stinkbug sdiri-n4 seashell sdi-n4é mushroom sgd-wasr_ rat sgamaré- lizard skaca frog gS skasku, kasku bighorn sheep ski-n4 blackbird ski-yu giant skéri-n&é flour sk4?4-dyu bullsnake skasr fish skirt-n4, ska-rand peas skofi-na wagon sp4?4e1 mockingbird spérd4-n4 plate spinin{f dwarf corn spuirt-nd chickenpox sti-na autumn sté-c1 straight Saska roadrunner $4-witi parrot i-bu?uku cotton boll 346. 347, 348. 349. 350. 351. 352. 353. 354, 355. 356. 357. 358. 359. 360. 361. 362. 363. 364. 365. 366. 367. 368. 369. 370. 371. 372. 373. 374. 375. 376. 377. 378. 379. 380. o8l. 382. 383. 384. 385. 386. 387. 388. 389. 390. 391. 392. 393. 394. 395. 396. 397. 398. [Bull. 191 % Suku corner corpse suwimi turquoise sdmhd scattered si-naya slow su. narrative particle sici- raw siiguéad. cross, crucifix simékawii right hand sumi already stist bluejay siwi- snake stiyind around siza-na coyote tA-ma five tiyé- far ta thus ti-ca springtime °i-bdydni fireplace wadyu?uni pottery wdgont dress, shirt wa-nI smoke wa-st bird snare wast-cr dust wi-wi medicine wa-wdizoni root we that one wisdy4-ka bow ws-?é6 thank you (men’s speech) WAbt-stéa eagle down wabdni_ abalone shell wa-¢int tongue wiisti bowl wa-yusa duck winuska heart wi-sga robin Wisi-ni nose WispI cigarette yar?di sand yabast corn silk yasbusi cottonwood cotton yé-tu mesquite yu? yonder yurdsi there yubds worm yudaé-ca windsterm yuké. that way yuku away yupé-stéa story, legend Anthrop.Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 169 399. 400. 401. 402. 403. 404. 405. 406. 407. 408. 409. 410. 411. yusi from there 412. yt-sbi-ni shoulder yuwé- this way 413. yti-sktirh4 corncob ya-bi staff of office 414. za no ya-Gint shelled corn 415. zdiéa field ya-ka ripe corn 416. zadya_ plains, desert yauni stone 417. zdsdima grinding box yasbuzani brains 418. zd&wini old yiusadi sand 419. zdzi not ya?dwa-ni intestines 420. zé-ni talkative yawasti stick 421. zi what, something ya-yu crippled 422. zikusdy4wi bridge yu. expression of doubt 423. zind again ya-ni song 424. gadict rabbit club VERBS Verbs are listed alphabetically by the verb core. The stem or stems based on each core follow, together with the stem classification. See ‘“‘Verb Classes’ for an outline of stem classification and “Stem Variants” for an explanation of notations identifying stem variants. 425. 426. 427. 428. 429. 430. 431. 432. 433. 434. 435. 436. 437. 438. 439. 440. 441. 442. 443. 444, -a to be. -a(?) Singular, Class 11-25 intransitive. -é-?E-sutr Dual, Class 11-26 intransitive. -a-?a Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive. -a to have, to possess. -a Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -4-?4 Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -4?4-SE Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive. -?a to be closed. -A?4-?a Singular, Class 10 intransitive. ?ésu—a_ to sneeze. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -?u_ to give a flat or long object. -Au?u Irregular transitive. -?u to dwell. -4u?u Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -4-?4u?u Dual, Class 2—24 intransitive. -bdi to sleep. -i-bdi Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -d4?d4ibdi Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -é?é-bai?-81 Plural, Class 11—25 intransitive. -bé-bi grandparent, a man’s mother’s mother or father’s father. -dbd-ba Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -baidyu_ to awake, get someone out of bed. -{-badyu((?)) Class C4 transitive. -ba’tu to sleep. -i-ba?tu Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -d?diba?tu Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -é?é-ba?tu Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive. -bdya toliyhta fire. -ibdya Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -fbdya-na Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -fbdya-ne Plural, Class 10-21 intransitive. -be to tell. -t/abe(-?) (-wv-) Class Al transitive. -béuca to call. -u/abéuca Class Al transitive. -be-ta to ask. -t/Abe-ta (-¥v-) Class A8 transitive. -bi to get wood. -ubi Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. bi-ri—ant to be smooth. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. -biya sister-in-law. -dbiya Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -bu-cr_ to be frightened. -ubu-c1 Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. bi-pu—ant fresh, cool. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. btisu—a_ to have an odor. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive. 170 445. 446. 447. 448. 449. 450. 451. 452. 453. 454. 455. 456. 457. 458. 459. 460. 461. 462. 463. 464. 465. 466. 467. 468. 469. 470. 471. 472. 473. 474. 475. 476. 477. 478. 479. 480. 481. 482. 483. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 -bénaca to sew. -aubdénaca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -bonai?1 to put ina bag. -Subonai?r Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. bd?sri—1 winding, zigzag. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. c4-—a_ to breathe. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -cikuya to say to. -acikuya Singular, Class 10—-7 intransitive. -CAyAWA tobeangry. -tcayawa (future -t¢ayawa) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -Géayawa-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -4?4-¢ayawa-nE Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. ¢cdyi—1 to be broken. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -cdyuca to break. -A?4ucdyuca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -cé-naca to chew. -A?4uéé-naca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -c1 to arrive. -4?4e1 Singular, Class 10—-7 intransitive. -4-?4¢r Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -cidyusta to think, to worry. -Ucidyusta Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -ci-ku to be guilty. -d-ti-ku Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -cipa toneed,to want. -tcipa Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. Transi- tive forms conforming to Class B based on the stem -{¢fpa also occur for first and second person objects. -cisu. water well. -d?4-cisu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -cdcaca to cut. -A?4ucdeaca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -CaA to rain. -aéa Singular, Class 4 intransitive. -éa to fall. -Géa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -4¢éa-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -Gant to stand. -déant Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -Gini to dance. -aci-ni Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -Gint yellow. -ut-éint Singular, unclassified intransitive. ki-citt it is yellow. éi-—a tobelch. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -cu to have ina bag. -t-éu Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -i-?iéu Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -i-waéu Plural, Class 2-23 in- transitive. -ta tooth. -4?4éa Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -ta to be hot. -4-éa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -tAi?1 to close the eyes. -6?S¢4i21 Singular, Class 5-8 intrasitive. -t4wa to steal. -t-é4wa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -td4yutha to be tired. -Gédyurba Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. -cA animal’s horn. -4ca Singular, Class 10 intransitive. -cA to build a house. -d-?aca Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -cA todo. -i-ca Singular, Class 14-4 intransitive. -f-za--na Dual, Class 14-20 intransitive. -f-za--ne Plural, Class 14-19 intransitive. -cA tohappen. -A?dicA Singular, Class 9 intransitive. -ca house. -deax Singular, Class 4 intransitive. -4?4-ca Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive. -caka tosmoke. -acaka Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -da-?a to ask for something. -uidd-?a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -dé?4u grandparent, woman’s father’s father or mother’s mother. -ddd?du Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. da?4wa—a _ to boil. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. -di to plant. -d4udi(?) Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -d4udi-ma Dual, Class 9-12 intransitive. -4-w4-di-mz Plural, Class 5-9 in- transitive. -di to give a bulky object. -tdi(?) Class D3 transitive. -di-na_ to be covered. -‘di-na(?) Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. Baa ares LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 171 484. 485. 486. 487. 488. 489. 490. 491. 492. 493. 494. 495. 496. 497. 498. 499. 500. 501. 502. 503. 504. 505. 506. 507. 508. 509. 510. 511. 512. 513. 514. 515. 516. 517. 518. 519. 520. 521. 522, 523. 524. 525. 526. 527. 528. 529. 530. -di-8a to feed. -i/Adi-8a(?) Class Cl transitive. -di-ye to get, to fetch. -tdi-ye Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -didya to hang something. -idtdya Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -d¥a_ tocatch. -i/Adya(?) Class C3 transitive. -d¥a todescend. -dd¥a (-dd¥a) Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -dy4. to possess an animal. -‘@dyé- or -‘4)dv4.8e Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -dyad¥1 to fight. -idyadyt Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. -dyaSi to fast. -tdvaSr Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -t-?ddyakr Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. --wAadya’r Plural, Class 2-23 in- transitive. -dy4wa tostab. -{/Ady4wa Class Cl transitive. -dvi-wa to be helpful. -tidy4-wa(?) Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -d¥u tocost. -fdyu Singular, Class 14 intrancitive. -d¥u toarrive. -é-dy¥u Plural, Class 11—25 intransitive. -d¥u_ to know, to be aware of. -dudyu Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -dyimi toremember. -t-/4:d¥im1 Class B6 transitive. -dyimica tolearn. -audyumica Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -dyimicuwl to forget. -t-/4-dyimicuwi Class B4 transitive. -d¥ima man’s brother. -ddyima Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -dyusi to be afraid. -udyusr Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. dys—A4n1 to be lazy. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -gi tolook. -igd (-ika) Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -giya to sit. -tgtya Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -tgtiya-ha Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -giya to place, to send, to sell. -i/Agiya Class Cl transitive. -gécati to blossom. -Agécatr Singular, Class 1 intransitive. hdédu—a to yawn. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -hima fo believe. -tihima Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -k4- to hear. -dkdé- Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. kdéyi—1 to be broken. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -kdi to be full, satisified. -ukdéi (-bkat) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -ka1 ftoliedown. -ikat (fut. -igai) Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. -kaéa tosee. -t/Akaéa (-Vv-) Class A2 transitive. -kazi to heal. -t/dkazi((?)) Class A4 transitive. -ku to bite. -aku Class B1 transitive. -ku togo. -éku Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive. -ku to be located. -aku (-iku) Singular, Class 1-16 intransitive. -ku-mi_ to bring. -diku-mi(?) Class D3 transitive. -kupawA to chop. -ikupAwa Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -ikupawa-na Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -fkupawa-nEe Plural, Class 10-21 intransitive. -kuya todo. -ékuya (fut. -éguya) Singular, Class 11-25 intransitive. kd-—anr to bered. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -ka mouth. -t-ka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -kaica to hit. -6-/4-kaica Class Al transitive. -kiya to wipe. ~t-kaya Class A7 transitive. -ki-ni friend. -é4ukt-ni Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -kui wife. -Adukui Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -kfiica man’s sister. -dktica Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -ktimind string. -ukimin4 Singular, Class 4 intransitive. -kirt-né kidney. -d4uktrt-né Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. kita—1 smoke, billowing dust. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. 172 531. 532. 533. 534. 535. 536. 537. 538. 539. 540. 541° 542. 543. 544. 545. 546. 547. 548. 549. 550. 551. 552. 553. 554. 555. 556. 557. 558. 059. 560. 561. 562. 563. 564. 565. 566. 567. 568. 569. 570. 571. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 -ma togo. Unclassified intransitive, occurring only in the hortative mode. ?j-ma go. -ma- thigh. -4-ma- Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -ma-ci to betrue. -dima-cr Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdima-e1 at ts true. -maka daughter. -A4maka Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -m4-zini to help. -t-mé-zdni(?) Class D3 transitive. -mu-cA to thunder. -Aumt-ca Singular, Class 9 intransitive. -mi¢éu toe. -d-mtiéu Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -mudyuca to kill. -G/Amudyuca Class Al transitive. mura—1 dented. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -muSA beard. -4-mu8a Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -mdmd grandfather, grandchild. -dumdméd Singular, Class 7-15 intransi- tive. -mé-tr son. -4mé-t1r Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -tha house, to dwell. -A4-na Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -4?4-tha Dual, Class 2—24 intransitive. -mhaci waist. -tmhatr Singular, Class 4~3 intransitive. -tmnma-d¥a_ to pick fruit. -ttmh/m4-d¥a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -tha-pa palm of hand. -drha-pa Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -masdi hand, finger. -Athasdi(?) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -mna to leave, emerge. -trha Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -{-tha Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -é-tha Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive. -na eye. -A-na Singular, unclassified intransitive. kA-na his eye. -na- to becloudy. -ina- Singular, Class 10 intransitive. -naéat stomach. -t-naéat Singular, Class 4~3 intransitive. -nddyiwi to light a fire. -d&nddyiwi(?) Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -Anddyiwi-ma Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -dndd¥iwi-me Plural, Class 10-21 intransitive. -ndmati seat, nest. -dndmdtr Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -némaca to stop, rebuke. -u-/é-ndétmhaca Class Al transitive. -ndsgdi head. -dndsgdi Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -nata to buy. -inata Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -nata tocook. -dinata Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -nawant tobe mean. -4-nawant Singular, Class 12-27 intransitive. -ndwe man’s mother’s brother, sister’s son. -A-ndéwe Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -nd-ya mother, aunt. -d4nd-ya Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -ni to know, be acquainted with. -t/dni((?)) Class B5 transitive. -ni to go, to walk. -a&-ni Singular, Class 6-3 intransitive. -ni-ca to pull. -t-nd-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -naisdyu father, father’s brother. -dnaisdyu Singular, Class 7-15 in- transitive. -Anaisdyu-Se Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive. -naza to be healthy. -tn/naza(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -Gn/naza?a-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -nésa to look, to peer. -in/nésa Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive. -neta to say. -dineta Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -ni body. -infi Singular, Class 14—4 intransitive. -nutt lower leg. -d4unuttr Class 1-1 intransitive. -pdniustu to be thirsty. -fpdéniustu Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -dipdniustu Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -diydpdniustu Plural, Class 2—23 intransitive. -péni tobedry. -i-pdni Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. Anthrop.PaP- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 173 572. 573. 574. 575. 576. 577. 578. 579. 580. 581. 582. 583. 584. 585. 586. 587. 588. 589. 590. 591. 592. 593. 594. 595. 596. 597. 598. 599. 600. 601. 602. 603. 604. 605. 606. 607. 608. 609. 610. 611. 612. 613. 614. 615. 616. 617. -pasdy’u_ to be tied. -dpasd¥u Singular, Class 7-13 intransitive. -pasi tobe dark. -Apast Singular, Class 6 intransitive. -pE toeat. -upe Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -A-?abe Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -d-?apE Plural, Class 2—23 intransitive. péta—a tobe cracked. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. -pt forehead. -tpr Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. piséa—1 flat, spread out. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -pt-caA to blow. -ti-pti-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -pa toenter. -Uupa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -pakaca totouch. -t/d4pakaca Class Al transitive. -sA difficult. -d&usa Singular, Class 6 intransitive. -sé to draw water. -ausé Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -sipa eyelash. -isipA Singular, Class 14—4 intransitive. -sukuca to kick. -G/4sukuca Class Al transitive. -sume?esta to teach. -{/Asurne?esta(-) Class D1 transitive. -sbi-ca to whistle. -Usbi-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -sbdea_ to string beads. -tsbéca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -stéca to squeal, make an animal noise. -t-stéca Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. sti-—a to swallow. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive. sétisu—A to cough. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive. -sdi foot. -dsdi(?) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. sdi.—1 bowl-shaped. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -sdya tosuck. -i-sdya Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -sdyirt to be brown. -Uisd¥i1r1 Singular, Class 6 intransitive. -sgu-cuct to drool, slobber. -t-sgi-cuct Singular, Class 13-28 intransi- tive. -sgumasa_ to hide. -tisgumaSa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -ska to drink. -dska Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -Aska Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -Aska-ta Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive. skdst—1 to be hard. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. skiré—1 spherical. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -ské-?a¢a1_ to turn around. -aiské-?acar Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. skéti—1 round. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -spika to paint. -i-sptka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -spa-cA to push. -ispa-caA Class Cl transitive. -spa?dkaca to knock at the door. -t-sp4?4kaca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -stayA to be cold. -distaya (future -disdaya) Singular, Class 1 intransi- tive. -stayA to be breezy. -éstaya (future -ésdaya) Singular, Class 10 in- transitive. -sti to give a liquid. -{/Asti(?) Class D3 transitive. -sti-ca city, town. ~A?4-sti-ca Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -stu to die. -astu Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -$a tostep. -48A Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -SA toclose. -d?4-8a Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -Se name. -4-3e Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -86 tobe white. -48é6 Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -S1 knee. -aSi Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -S{-cr to be hospitable. -4-Si-cr Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -Su to be wet. -aSu Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. Suku—1 square. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. 174 618. 619. 620. 621. 622. 623. 624. 625. 626. 627. 628. 629. 630. 631. 632. 633. 634. 635. 636. 637. 638. 639. 640. 641. 642. 643. 644. 645. 646. 647. 648. 649. 650. 651. 652. 653. 654. 655. 656. 657. 658. 659. 660. 661. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Sipa—a to spit. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -saca to name, to call ones name. -isaca (-Vv-) Class C1 transitive. s4t—a torn. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. s4t—1 torn. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. siwi—1 crooked. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive. -ta to kill. -duta Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -duda-pa Dual, Class 9-12 intransitive. -4-wata-wa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. -tA-nica towork. -Ut&-nicA Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -Uté-niza-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -iwatd-niza-ne Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. -tidya back. -‘4tidya Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdtidya his back. -tigu to remove many objects. -utigu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -tika-8a to climb. -ttika-8a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -tikuya to cry. -attkuya (future. -atiguya) Singular, Class 1-3 in- transitive. -ti8a totalkto -attSa Class A2 transitive. -tu-ni to know. -Utu-ni Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -t4 to put in, to write down. -it4 Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -t4 to be full. -5-t&4 Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -t4 to test, try. -t-/4-t4 Class Al transitive. AGA 0 step on. -{-ta(-) Class C2 transitive. -ta toopen. -4?4-+a Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -tady1 to stand up. -d-tadyr Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -ti to give a granular substance. -{/Ati(?) Class D8 transitive. -tu-dyu fence. -A-tu-dyu Singular, Class 10 intransitive. -wicasayA to stir. -GwdcaSaya Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. wéka—a _ to spill. Type B, singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -wakuica to marry. -iwakuica Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive. -wa:sa tobe sick. -tiwa-sa(?) Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -wast to attack, pick a fight. -duwa-st Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -wa:sd¥u to watch, guard. -twa-sdyu Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -waWl face. -iwawr Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdwaw1 his face. -wi neck. -dwi Singular, Class 1—1 intransitive. -wicl chest. -4witt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -wiéd-ca to listen to. -t/dwiéd-caA Class Al transitive. -wisbota to loosen, untie. -twisbota Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -wiska blue, green. -dwiska Singular, Class 6-3 intransitive. -wi-stiye to be happy. -{fwi-stiye(?) Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -wigstkuya to scold. -twiStkuya Class A2 transitive. -wi-za neck. -dwi-za Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. wdka—a _ to move, shake. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -w4 to kill (plural object) -Gw/w4 Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -witl toapproach. -Gwat1 Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -watl tohaveaturn. -(-watt Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. -wi-é1 tongue. -dwdé-ér1 Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive. -wadva_ togather something. -iwadya(?) Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -wAka to dress. -Gw/waka Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -wanE to go hunting. -iw/wane (future -tiw4-ne-) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -wasd4, tobe sour. -d4wasd4 Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdwasd4 ait is sour. Anthrop; 22) LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 175 662. 663. 664. 665. 666. 667. 668. 669. 670. 671. 672. 673. 674. 675. 676. 677. 678. 679. 680. 681. 682. 683. 684. 685. 686. 687. 688. 689. 690. 691. 692. 693. 694. 695. 696. 697. 698. 699. 700. 701. 702. -wati man’s male in-law. -&wati Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -wi child. -A-wi Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -wi-éa claw, fingernail. -4?4wi-éa Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. winti—1 fast. Type B, singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -wi?sa to fall. -0Q-wi?Sa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. -wisI nose. -AwiSt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -wi-tEyA to worship. -dw/wi-teya (future -iwi-deya) Singular Class 5-2 intransitive. -tw/wi-deya-pa Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -tiw/wi-deya-wa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive. -yi to skin an animal. -ty4& Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -ty4--na Dual, Class 1-18 intransitive. -ty4--ne Plural, Class 1-17 intransi- tive. -yi to be born. -fyd4 Singular, Class 14-4 intransitive. -yaka to burn something. -dyaka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -yamhastu to be hungry. -fyarhastu Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -yanikuya to tell, command. -i/A4yanikuya Class Cl transitive. yata—1 to be weak. Type B, singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -yd-t1 sharp. -fyd-t1 Singular, Class 13 intransitive. -yu hard. -dyu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -yu to go. -é?éyu Dual, Class 11-26 intransitive. -yi-kam1 to wait for. -{/4y0-kam1 Class D6 transitive. -yutayA heavy. -dyttaya (future -4yitaya) Singular, Class 1-1 -ya-?a to promise, to loan. -fy4-?a Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive. -yaska to sweep. -4y/yaska Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -yéina to find. -{/4yéima Class C7 transitive. -Yéipa tolook for. -{/4yéipa Class C2 transitive. -yéisiya toeat. --yéi8iya Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -yutid’i-ca to rest. -tyicéid¥i-ca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -yi-mht arm. -4yt-rht Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -yupi ear. -4yupr1 Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -yuska tail. -d4yuska Singular, Class 1 intransitive. -yi-spt shoulder. -4yti-spt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -yuta tosing. -ty/ytta Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -za_ to say. -°za(?) Singular, Class 7-13 intransitive. -Aza(?) Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -azi?i-ya Plural, Class 2-23 intransi- tive. -za?anikuya to preach. -tza?anikuya (future -tiza?aniguya) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -z4ipa shadow. -Azdipa Singular, Class 1 intransitive. -24-?azi to swim. -aizd-?azi(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -zé-su to dream. -dizé-su Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -zi to lie down. -aizi(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. zu—v (zQ-n-) to go. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -ziwaA to pay. -f-ztiwa(-) Class Cl transitive. -aiztiwa(-) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -24:Ciwa to awake. -izd-éGwa Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive. -7a-6A to fall. -t-za-éa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -z5 husband. -4-z5 Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -zacaA torun. -izdcA Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive. 176 703. 704. 705. 706. 707. 708. 709. 710. CHA, 712. 713. 714. 715. 716. reve 718. (eur 720. 721. 722. 723. 724. 725. 726. 727. 728. 729. 730. 731. 732. 733. 734. 735. 736. 737. 738. 739. 740. 7A. 742. 743. 744, 745. 746. 747. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 AFFIXES AND CLITICS ?. Second person hortative. 114H -a- Reflexive-reciprocal. 301 -4?a- Passive voice. 302A -a- Passive voice. 302B -?g Plural subject. 502K -?u Verbal auxiliary dual subject. e- Third person indicative and negative. 121J 122J c- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113C 116C ci- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113B 116B ¢c- Third person indicative and negative. 121H 122H ¢- Fourth person subject with third person object, indicative and negative. 131B 132B ci- Third person indicative and negative. 121I 1221 ci- First person indicative. 101B ¢é- Third person dubitative. 123C é4?- Third person dubitative. 123F -Gadyaya Continuative action. 401G é- Third person dubitative. 123D é& Second person hortative. 114D éu- Second person subject with first person object, indicative, negative, dubitative, and future hortative. 151B 152B 153B 156B e- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113A 116A ec4?- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113D 116D ¢a- First person subject with second person object, dubitative, and future hortative. 143B 146B d- Third person dubitative. 123G d- Second person hortative. 114F -de Plural conditional. 601B -di Locative-instrumental clitic. di- Third person dubitative. 123B di- Fourth person subject with third person object, dubitative. 133A di- Second person hortative. 114G di- Third person subject with second person object, hortative. 174B -dika Locative-instrumental clitic. -dimhi_ Benefactive. dy- Third person dubitative. 123A dvya- Third person dubitative. 123E -dyanu Narrative past tense clitic. -dvé-mi Pluralizing clitic. -d¥r Dual subject. 501C dvid- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113F 116F dyidi- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113G 116G dyidi- Third person subject with second person object, dubitative and future hortative. 173B 176B dyu- Second person subject with first person object, indicative, negative, dubitative, and future hortative. 151A 152A 153A 156A dysz- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113E 116E dydz- Third person subject with second person object, dubitative and future hortative. 173A 176A g- Third person indicative and negative. 121A 122A ga- Third person indicative and negative. 121E 122K Antbropj; *?- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 177 748. gu- Second person subject with first person object, hortative and negative hortative. 154A 155A 749. gdd- Second person indicative and negative. 111F 112F 750. gddi- Second person indicative and negative. 111G 112G 751. gédi- Third person subject with second person object, indicative and negative. 171B 172B 752. gd3z- Second person indicative and negative. 111E 112E 753. gdz- Third person subject with second person object, indicative and negative. 171A 172A 754. k- Third person indicative and negative. 121C 122C 755. k- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104C 105E 756. ka- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104A 105C 757. kdé?- Third person indicative and negative. 121F 122F 758. ka?- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104D 105F 759. -ku Continuative action. 401D 760. -kuyA Continuative action. 401A 76. ke-) Third person indicative and negative. 121D 122D 762. ka- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104B 105D 763. ku- Second person subject with first person object, hortative and negative hortative. 154B 155B 764. -ma Remote state. 403 765. -meE Plural subject. 502K 766. -mi Benefactive. 767. -mi Direction toward. 768. -motr Dual subject. 501E 769. -rmha Verbal auxiliary suffix. 770. -rthasA Plural subject. 502F 771. -masutr Dual subject. 501F 772. mé.- Augmentative. 773. -mE Plural subject. 502D 774. -mxr_ Suffixed to place names to indicate inhabitants of that place. 775. -mi Benefactive. 776. -tha Dual subject. 501D 777. n- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104G 105G 106C 778. n- Future tense. 201A 779. -ndmi Direction toward. 780. -nani Nominalizer. 781. -ne Conditional. 601A 782. -nE Plural subject. 502B 783. -nE Unfulfilled action. 402B 784. ni- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104E 105A 106A 785. ni- Future tense. 201B 786. -ni Benefactive. 787. -ni Nominalizer. 788. -ni Direction from. 789. ni?- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 1041 105I 106E 790. ni?- Future tense. 201E 791. -nikuya Continuative action. 401B 792. -nu- Conditional. 602 178 793. 794. 795. 796. ote 798. 799. 800. 801. 802. 803. 804. 805. 806. 807. 808. 809. 810. 811. 812. 813. 814. 815. 816. 817. 818. 819. 820. 821. 822. 823. 824. 825. 826. 827. 828. 829. 830. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 néd- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104K 105K 106G néd- Future tense. 201G nédi- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104L 105L 106H nédi Third person subject with first person object, hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 164B 165B 166B -notr Dual subject. 501B néz- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104J 1053 106F néz- Third person subject with first person object, hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 164A 165A 166A néz- Future tense. 201F n- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104H 105H 106D n- Future tense. 201C -nE Plural subject. 502A -nE Unfulfilled action. 402A -nE Verbal auxiliary conditional. ni- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104F 105B 106B ni- Future tense. 201D -ni Nominalizer. -na Dual subject. 501A p- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124C 125C 126C p- Second person hortative. 114A pa- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124E 125E 126E p4?- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124F 125F 126F pi- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124A 125A 126A pi- Second person hortative. 114B pi?- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124G 125G 126G -pa Dual subject. 501H p- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124D 125D 126D pi- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 124B 125B 126B pi- Fourth person subject with third person object, hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 134 135 136 ré-- Diminutive. s- First person indicative. 101C -sA Verbal auxiliary plural subject. -sE Plural subject. 502M si- First person indicative. 101A -si_ Locative-instrumental clitic. si?- First person indicative. 101F -sa Continuative action. 401F séd- First person indicative. 101H séz- First person indicative. 101G Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 179 831. 832. 833. 834. 835. 836. 837. 838. 839. 840. 841. 842. 843. 844. 845. 846. 847. 848. 849. 850. 851. 852. 853. 854. 855. 856. 857. 858. 859. 860. 861. 862. 863. 864. 865. 866. 867. 868. 869. 870. 871. 872. 873. 874. 875. 876. 877. 878. 879. 880. sé- sé- sé- sc- sc- yz. SCl- sti- sdy- sdy- sdy- sdy- sd¥i- sdvi- sg- sg- sg- sg- sg- sga- sga- sk- sk- Indefinite subject. 181C First person negative. 102J Second person negative hortative. 115J Indefinite subject. 181D First person negative. 102H Second person negative hortative. 115H Third person subject with first person object, negative. 162B Third person subject with second person object, negative hortative. 175B First person negative. 1021 Second person negative hortative. 115I First person negative. 102G Second person negative hortative. 115G Third person subject with first person object, negative. 162A Third person subject with second person object, negative hortative. 175A First person negative. 102B Second person negative hortative. 115B First person negative. 102A First person indicative. 1011 Second person negative hortative. 115A Indefinite subject. 181A Third person subject with first person object, indicative. 161A First person negative. 102E Second person negative hortative. 115K First person negative. 102C Second person negative hortative. 115C skdé?- First person negative. 102F ska?- Second person negative hortative. 115F sk- sk- sk- sku- sku- st- sti?- sti- Indefinite subject. 181B First person negative. 102D Second person negative hortative. 115D First person indicative. 101J Third person subject with first person object, indicative. 161B First person hortative and negative hortative. 1040 1050 First person hortative and negative hortative. 104P 105P First person hortative and negative hortative. 104Q 105Q s- First person indicative. 101D si- First person indicative. 101E 8- Second person indicative and negative. 111C 112C §- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104M 105M -86 -SE Nominalizing clitic. Plural subject. 5021 -§i Locative-instrumental clitic. -S1 Plural subject. 502J Si- Second person indicative and negative. 111B 112B S- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104N 105N s- Second person indicative and negative. 111A 112A sa- First person subject with second person object, indicative, negative, hortative, and negative hortative. 141A 142A 144A 145A -sanu Narrative past tense clitic. -sutl Dual subject. 501G s- Second person indicative and negative. 111D 112D 180 881. 882. 883. 884. 885. 886. 887. 888. 889. 890. 891. 892. 893. 894. 895. 896. 897. 898. 899. 900. 901. 902. 903. 904. 905. 906. 907. 908. 909. 910. 911. 912. 913. 914. 915. 1G: 917. 918. 919. 920. 921. 922. 923. 924. 925. 926. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 $a- First person subject with second person object, indicative, negative, hortative, and negative hortative. 141B 142B 144B 145B t- First person dubitative. 103C t- Third person dubitative. 123J -ta Continuative action. 401E -ta Plural subject. 502C ta?- First person dubitative. 103D -td-nt Nominalizer. -tE Plural negative. 603 ti- First person dubitative. 103A ti?- First person dubitative. 103H -tikuya Continuative action. 401C téd- First person dubitative. 103F tédi- First person dubitative. 103G tédi- Third person subject with first person object, dubitative. 163B téz- First person dubitative. 105E téz- Third person subject with first person object, dubitative. 163A t- Third person dubitative. 123H ¢- Fourth person subject with third person object, dubitative. 133B t- Second person hortative. 114C ti- First person dubitative. 103B ti- Third person dubitative. 123I -wa Numeral suffix. -wA Plural subject. 502G -wE Plural subject. 502H -wE Unfulfilled action. 402C -wi Benefactive. -wi Nominalizer. -ya Numeral suffix. -yA Plural subject. 502L LOANWORDS ?amd-pu_ pillow. Spanish almohada. ?araBigu- apricot. Sp. albaricoque. ?ard-ru plow. Sp. arado. ?ara-sa rice. Sp. arroz. ?ayund- lent, fast. Sp. ayunar. ?isbd-ri sword. Sp. espada. ?isdi-pa stove. Sp. estufa. Bagé-ta leather. Sp. vaqueta. Banpé. basin, tin cup. Sp. bandeja. Bé-ra bullet. Sp. bala. BA-sA_ drinking glass. Sp. vaso. Bend4-na window. Sp. ventana. BidaBé- beets. Sp. betabel. BU-Gi buggy. BuiyasI oxen. Sp. buey. ba- bread. Sp. pan. bé-ni cloth. Sp. pajio. Ame oT P ~=«LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS No. 927. 928. 929. 930. 931. 932. 933. 934. 935. 936. 937. 938. 939. 940. 941. 942. 943. 944. 945. 946. 947. 948. 949. 950. 951. 952. 953. 954. 955. 956. 957. 958. 959. 960. 961. 962. 963. 964. 965. 966. 967. 968. 969. 970. 971. 972. 973. 974. 975. 976. 977. 978. 979. ba-sku feast, holy day. Sp. pascua. bé-su straw. Sp. paja. béla pear. Sp. pera. bici-tr pig. Nahuatl pitzoil. bisé-ri blanket, rug. Sp. pisar. bisgd-ri_ church officer. Sp. fiscal. bla-sa city. Sp. plaza. dd4bi-pu governor. Zuni ta-pu-pu. dé-sA cup. Sp. taza. dasaSti-na taxes. Sp. tasacién. didaét priest. Nahuatl totatzin. dumi-ku Sunday. Sp. domingo. dunasi. automobile. Sp. automédvil. dyé-nda_ store. Sp. tienda. aayé-ta biscuit. Sp. galleta. gagawa-t1 peanut. Sp. cacahuate. gahé-ra drummer. Sp. cajero (?). gahti-na box. Sp. cajén. gamaé-tu bed. Sp. cama (?). gand-st1 basket, nest. Sp. canasta. gané-ru. sheep. Sp. carnero. gapé. coffee. Sp. café. gasi-k1 high priest, king. Sp. cacique. gé-silu jail. Sp. carcel. gi-su box. Sp. caja. gawa-yu horse. Sp. caballo. gawiya-ra_ herd of horses. Sp. caballada. gayawart-sa barn. Sp. caballeriza. guBé-nta church. Sp. convento. gu-li cabbage. Sp. col. gumunird- jail. Sp. comandancia. gunZu- mattress. Sp. colchon. gurd- corral. Sp. cerral. guy4-ri yoke, horse collar. Sp. collera. haBi- soap. Sp. jabén. hied-ntr giant. Sp. gigante. hua John. Sp. Juan. huisist Thursday. Sp. jueves. ht-runa outdoor oven. Sp. horno. kasdi-ra Mexican, Spanish-American. Sp. Castilla. kisd- stew. Sp. guisado. lé-ba, ré-ba coat. Sp. leva. leli-sa watch, clock. Sp. reloj. m4a-dist T'wesday. Sp. martes. madi-ya hammer. Sp. martillo. mé-gurist Wednesday. Sp. miércoles. merigé-na Anglo-American. Sp. americano. merti-ni melon. Sp. melén. mé-sA table. Sp. mesa. mé-stru teacher. Sp. maestro. misakdi church. Sp. misa plus native -kAi. mu-la mule. Sp. mulo. mura-tu Negro. Sp. mulato. 181 182 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 980. mt-sa cat. Sp. moza. 981. naBd-hu pocket knife. Sp. navaja. 982. nardn orange. Sp. naranja. 983. nurd&-st peach. Sp. durazno. 984. nuZuwé-nu Christmas. Sp. Nochebuena. 985. regesi. cream. Sp. requesén. 986. resd- prayer. Sp. rezar. 987. rey4-tu rawhide rope. Sp. reata. 988. rigust rich. Sp. rico. 989. ra-ku crazy. Sp. loco. 990. ri-nisr Monday. Sp. lunes. 991. rusd-yu beads. Sp. rosario. 992. sagisdd4-na sacristan. Sp. sacristén. 993. sanpi-ya watermelon. Sp. sandia. 994. sandiyé-ku St. James. Sp. Santiago. 995. sd-waru Saturday. Sp. sdbado. 996. semi-tu bread. Sp. semita. 997. seré-su cherry. Sp. cereza. 998. siBiyu. bird. Sp. silbar. 999. sirawé- plum. Sp. ciruela. 1,000. siyé-ta chair. Sp. silleta. 1,001. sunpé-ru_ soldier. Sp. soldado. 1,002. wa-gast cow. Sp. vaca. 1,003. wanisSu- harness. Sp. guarniciones. 1,004. ward- something saved. Sp. guardar. 1,005. yé-nast Friday. Sp. viernes. 1,006. 4Zi-ri chili. Sp. chile. 1,007. Ziriyi- whip. Sp. chirrién. INDEX TO VOCABULARY abalone 380 antelope 221 able 36 to approach 655 above 115 apricot 911 abruptly 138 arm 686 adobe 81 around 362 afraid 501 to arrive 454, 495 again 302, 423 arrow 30 alkali 266 arrowhead 195 all 298 ashes 265 allright 186, 192 to ask 488, 478 almost 237 assistance 45 alone 274 to attack 642 already 21, 359 aunt 560 also 84 automobile 939 and 18, 126 autumn 341 Anglo-American 973 to awake 433, 699 angry 450 away 397 animal 198, 236 awl 181 ant 303 ax 42 [Bull. 191 sop TP «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS baby 51 back 212, 297, 302, 624 bad 253 badger 116 bag 284 ball 251 banana 206 bark 24 barn 954 basin 918 basket 50, 134, 946 bat 87 to be 425, 517 beads 991 beans 121 bear 130 beard 159, 540 beaver 128 bee 62 bed 945 bedbug 285 beets 922 behind 212 to belch 465 to believe 508 bell 48 big 259 bighorn sheep 329 bird 998 biscuit 941 bison 244 to bite 515 bitter 75 blackbird 330 blanket 931 blood 250 to blossom 506 to blow 578 blue 649 bluebird 351 bluejay 360 bobcat 104 body 92, 350, 568 to boil 480 boll 345 bone 170 to be born 670 both 31 bow 377 bowl 11, 52, 382 bowl-shaped 592 box 417, 944, 951 boy 249 682-611—64——_16 brains 405 bread 925, 996 to break 452 breath 69 to breathe 448 breezy 606 brick 81 bridge 422 to bring 518 broken 4651, 510 brother 118, 500 brown 594 buckskin 288 buffalo 244 bug 285, 323 buggy 923 to build 473 bullet 919 bullsnake 333 to burn 671 but 22 butterfly 65 to buy 556 buzzard 256 cabbage 956 cactus 23 to call 4387, 619 can 36 car 939 cat 980 to catch 487 cedar 227 centipede 25 chair 8, 1000 cherry 997 chest 646 to chew 453 chicken 311 chicken pox 340 child 663 chili 1006 to chop 519 Christmas 984 church 955, 977 church officer 9382 cigarette 387 city 171, 608, 933 claw 179, 664 clay 260 clean 214 to climb 626 clock 969 183 184 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY to close 469, 611 closed 427 cloth 926 cloud 187 cloudy 550 club 424 coals 152 coat 968 cob 413 coffee 948 cold 605 to command 673 to cook 557 cool 4438 corn 215, 317, 339, 402, 403 corncob 413 corner 349 cornhusk 98 cornmeal 287 corn silk 389 corpse 92, 350 corral 959 correct 342 to cost 494 cotton 207, 345, 390 cottonwood 201, 390 cougar 248 to cough 590 covered 483 cow 1002 coyote 363 cracked 575 crazy 989 cream 985 crippled 409 crooked 621 cross 357 crow 319 crucifix 357 tocry 627 cup 918, 935 to cut 459 to dance 463 dark 573 daughter 534 day 299 deer 108 dented 539 to descend 488 desert 416 to die 609 difficult 581 dipper 254 to do 474, 520 dog 99 doll 651 domestic animal 198 doorway 200 dove 204 down 282, 379 to draw water 582 to dream 695 dress 370 to dress 659 drill 55 to drink 597 to drool 595 drum 54 drummer 943 dry dil duck 383 dust 373, 530 to dwell 430, 543 eagle 105 ear 687 early 109 earring 43 earth 122, 142 east 135 eastward 135 to eat 574, 684 egg 281 eight 131 elk 120 to emerge 548 enough 186 to enter 579 everybody 139 evil 253 eye 209, 549 eyelash 583 face 644 fall 341 to fall 461, 666, 700 fancy 289 far 365 fast 318, 665, 914 to fast 491 fat 35, 295 father 564 feast 927 feather 141 to feed 484 Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS female 231 fence 637 to fetch 485 few 1438 field 415 to fight 490 to find 682 fine 289 finger 162, 547 fingernail 179, 664 fir 150 fire 152 fireplace 368 firewood 129 first 71 fish 334 five 364 flag 290 flat 577 flesh 33, 305 flour 28, 332 flower 506 fly 74 fog 189 food 39, 269 foot 169, 591 imoye iL PAf/ forehead 576 to forget 499 four 106 fOx Wo fresh 448 Friday 1005 friend 525 frightened 442 frog 328 from 97, 399 full 511, 631 game 236 to gather 658 to get 439, 485 giant 331, 962 girl 238 to give 429, 482, 607, 636 glass 920 to go 516, 531, 562, 677, 697 good 10, 292 goose 294, 348 gourd 110 governor 934 grandchild 6541 grandfather 541 grandparent 58, 432, 479 grass 14 grasshopper 316 green 649 grinding box 417 grinding stone 17 to guard 6438 guilty 456 gun 46 hail 161 hair 183 hammer 971 hand 162, 547 handkerchief 44 to hang 486 to happen 475 happy 650 hard 581, 598, 676 harness 1003 to have 426, 466, 489 hawk 89 head 555 to heal 514 healthy 565 to hear 509 heart 384 heat 228 heavy 679 help 45 to help 535 helpful 493 hen 311 here 95, 178 hide 291 to hide 596 to hit 523 holy day 927 honey 80, 321 horn 472 horned toad 90 horse 952 horse collar 960 horse herd 953 hospitable 615 hot 56, 468 house 4, 476, 543 how 133, 143 hummingbird 261 hungry 672 to hunt 660 husband 701 husk 98 185 186 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY I 191 and affix list ice 163 immediately 180 in-law 662 intestines 407 iron 79 itself 273 jackrabbit 107, 286 jail 950, 957 John 963 jug 312 juice 77 key 16 to kick 584 kidney 529 to kill 538, 622, 654 king 949 knee 614 knife 194, 981 to knock 604 to know 496, 561, 629 lamp 9 land 142 lard 35 large 259 last 313 last night 233 lazy 502 leaf 241 to learn 498 leather 288, 917 to leave 548 leg 156, 532, 569 legend 398 legging 38 lent 914 to lie down 512, 696 life 37 light 242 to light 4385, 552 lightning 66, 219 like 257 to listen to 647 little 296 liver 27 lizard 327 to loan 680 locust 78 log 68 long ago 160 long time 239 to look 503, 513, 566 to look for 683 to loosen 648 lopsided 63 louse 347 lunch 269 lung 283 man 145 manure 29 many 280 to marry 640 mat 3 match 653 mattress 3, 958 maybe 223 meadowlark 314 mean 558 meat 33, 305 medicine 374 medicine man 88 melon 974 mesquite 391 metal 300 metate 17 Mexican 966 middle 309 middle-aged 270 milk 210 mist 189 moccasin 172 mockingbird 337 moon 93 Monday 990 money 300 month 93 morning 125 mosquito 322 moss 230 moth 262 mother 560 mountain 234 mountain lion 248 mouse 306 mouth 522 to move 653 mud 258 mushroom 325 nail 7 naked 164 name 612 soko] 2 «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 187 to name 619 navel 146 near 138 neck 645, 652 to need 457 needle 40 Negro 979 nephew 559 nest 553, 946 new 268 night 276 nine 243 no 414 north 114 nose 386, 667 not 419 now 197 oak 140 odor 444 O.K. 192 old 418 once 151 one 32 oneself 277 onion 184 only 273 to open 634 orange 982 others 263 oven 965 oxen 924 to paint 602 palm 546 pants 13 paralyzed 409 parrot 344 to pay 698 peach 983 peanut 942 pear 929 peas 335 to peer 566 people, person 166 to pick 545 pig 930 pillow 910 pine 112, 165 pinony SE 12 place 94 to place 505 plains 416 plant 216 to plant 481 plate 338 plaza 224 plow 912 plum 999 pollen 173 popcorn 317 porcupine 34 to possess 426, 466, 489 pot 5, 1382 pottery 369 prairie dog 279 prayer 986 to preach 692 priest 937, 949 to promise 680 to pull 563 pumpkin 91 pure 214 purple 61 to push 603 to put 446, 630 quail 123 quickly 180 rabbit 107, 286, 293 rabbit club 424 to rain 460 rainbow 229 rat 326 rattle 110 raw 356 ready 154 to rebuke 554 reGumozt to remember 497 to remove 625 to rest 685 return 297, 302 ribs 64 rice 913 rich 988 right hand 358 river 86 road 199, 200 roadrunner 343 robin 385 rock 404 root 375 rope 47, 987 round 599, 601 188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY rubber 278 snake 361 rug 931 snare 372 torun 702 to sneeze 428 snow 174 sacristan 992 soap 961 saddle 41 soapweed 149, 245 St. James 994 soldier 1001 saliva 203 somebody 137 salt 264 something 421 sand 388, 406 satisfied 511 Saturday 995 saved 1004 to say 449, 567, 691 scattered 353 to scold 651 seat 8, 553 to see 513 seed 124, 202 to sell 505 to send 505 separate 275 seven 252 to sew 445 shadow 693 to shake 653 shaman 88 sharp 675 sheep 329, 947 shell 324, 380 shirt 370 shoe 172 shoulder 412, 689 to shut 611 sick 641 side 82 similar 257 to sing 690 sister 527 sister-in-law 441 to sit 504 six 320 skin 291 to skin 669 sky 208 to sleep 431, 434 slightly 2382 to slobber 595 slow 354 small 232, 296 smoke 371, 530 to smoke 477 smooth 440 somewhere 147 son 542 song 411 sour 661 south 217 southward 217 Spanish-American 966 spearhead 195 spherical 599 spider 226 to spill 639 to spit 618 spread out 577 springtime 367 square 224, 617 squash 91 to squeal 588 squirrel 304 to stab 492 staff 401 stalk 175 to stand 462, 635 star 346 to steal 470 to step 610, 633 stew 76, 967 stick 408 stinkbug 323 to stir 638 stocking 102 stomach 551 stone 404 to stop 554 store 940 storm 395 story 398 stove 916 straight 342 straw 928 string 528 to string beads 587 to suck 593 suddenly 138 summer 213 [Bull. 191 ORT» ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 189 sun 49 Sunday 938 sunflower 193 sure 301 to swallow 589 to sweep 681 sweet 220 toswim 694 sword 915 table 975 tail 688 take it 178 to talk to 628 talkative 420 tasty 10 taxes 936 to teach 585 teacher 976 to tell 486, 673 ten 222 to test 632 tether 6 thank you 272, 378 that 185, 376 that way 101, 153, 396 then 20 there 2, 12, 96, 176, 182, 392, 393 therefore 20, 127 thigh 156, 532 to think 455 thirsty 570 this 100 this way 103, 177, 400 three 85 thunder 536 Thursday 964 thus 366 tied 572 tilted 63 tired 471 toad 60 tobacco 157 today 197 toe 158, 537 tomorrow 83 tongue 381, 657 too 84 tooth 144, 467 torn 620 torso 64 tortilla 240 to touch 580 towel 44 town 171, 608 tree 201 trousers 13 true 533 to try 632 Tuesday 970 turkey 72 turn 656 to turn around 600 turquoise 352 turtle 188 twice 119 twilight 315 two 117 uncle 559, 564 under 271 to untie 648 up 113 very 246 vine 26 vulture 256 wagon 336 waist 544 to wait for 678 to walk 562 wall 70 to want 457 watch 969 to watch 643 water 77 watermelon 993 we 191 and affix list weak 674 Wednesday 972 well 292, 458 west 67 westward 67 wet 616 what 148, 421 wheat 15 when 155 where 136, 147 which 148 whip 1007 to whistle 586 white 613 whitewash 59 who 1387 wife 526 190 wildeat 104 willow 211 winding 447 window 921 windstorm 395 winter 218 to wipe 524 with 190 wolf 225 woman 231, 235 wood 129 woodpecker wool 205 word 255 to work 623 world 122 worm 394 310 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 to worry 455 to worship 668 to write 630 wrongdoing 308 to yawn 507 year 213 yellow 464 yesterday 307 yet 267 yoke 960 yonder 392 you 196 and affix list yucca 168 yucca fruit 206 zigzag 447 LITERATURE CITED GREENBERG, JOSEPH H. 1957. 1959 a. Essays in linguistics. Research. Viking Fund Publ. Miter, Wick R. Some notes on Acoma kinship terminology. Southwestern Journ. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Anthrop. No. 24. Anthrop., vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 179-184. 1959 b. Spanish loanwordsin Acoma: I. Intern. Journ. Amer. Linguistics, vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 147-153. 1960. Spanish loanwords in Acoma: II. Intern. Journ. Amer. Linguistics, vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 41-49. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 70 OBSERVATIONS ON CERTAIN ANCIENT TRIBES OF THE NORTHERN APPALACHIAN PROVINCE By BERNARD G. HOFFMAN to at i ln oe = ny et eee atte uae © ° tT 4 —=t ‘ ries — aA) vb - VMOTCUUITEVL VATHOR GT ha qgoleedt sawasA, lo casiall i? sole ee ate te OF .of1 wigs't taoinoforjoy lind eit ; ; whan LP are We) Bl OP VIIOVA. VLA TARO va CVIOITAVE oe 5 Ee RAV IWOOT AATIDA TN TSA: Vice Pa Se i ' raul AAA ATOM 32 Gah TEEATD il mor? s CONTENTS PAGE BESTT COLL GUN Tae mas ee ar a ee ee ere lee en ei eee 195 Mvidenes tor relations hiss 222.2 es ee ae a ee 196 1. Pocaughtawonauck—Massawomeck connection_____._________- 196 2. Massawomeck-Massomack connection_..._-_____-___-_-___-_-_ 198 3. Massawomeck-Black Minqua connection_______________.___-_-_ 201 4. Massawomeck=DErie: connection... 232 soso soe cc ek 204 &. Diack Mingue-lrieequncetion®! 12 724i eh io oe Se 206 G. Arripahapa-Prie connection: == 22. 652205 2 eee ale ee 210 ¢. Arrigahaga-Black Minqua connection_-..........-.......--._- 211 8. Richahecrian-Black Minqua connection___....____-.-----_____- 211 0. Hichaheerian-lirie connection... ..=—=20.222—c icc. sea ese 220 10. Richahecrian-Rickohockan connection_____-__--_-----_-___-_- 220 Hit hickohockan-Birie- connection: 222 2225229) Se Nols Peete 221 opi On Aste: eae free ae Eee dhe thay iy cae Tet Sk # eS A ae ete ee eee 221 31/0) oad: 0) SR oe Beem Sey ane nt SA Oe ee A eee ae ee ee 235 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE (Follows page 246) 26. Facsimile of section of Anonymous-Zufiiga map of c. 1608. TEXT FIGURE 6: Dideram of name relationships i245 -—22 532.6 Yeo she ose 195 MAPS 4. Fascimile of section of John Smith’s map of 1612_____----_---------- 197 5. Possible Potomac route of Captain Fleet’s brother__-_------------- 201 6. Facsimile of legend of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673___--------- 203 f(« Bacsinigle of John Wederer's:map of 1672.2. 4.2. ee eee soos 205 8. Facsimile of detail of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673___--------- 213 9. Protohistoric and early historic archeological phases of the Eastern WintbedtS Gates Sears Meee ates ees ein nk eee emi YN ae ak ope ca ee 221 10: Components of the Fort Ancient, Aspeeto = «2 22.2524 - se oS 2. 225 11. Components of the Monongahela and Shenk’s Ferry Aspects - ------- 229 122 (Components of the Iroquois Aspeet.—- 2.2. 2-22-22 22--22—— -- == 233 13. Probable distribution o£ Iroquoian tribese=:--=-2-2.-2-.-.--.---- 234 mt) eS eS 6 ne + Howe a =e = Se ye ee A ad ee ee ee fat ant a ee os ee ia ee oe es * - «see i oe ee — ee ee -_& Oe ee ee —- ee <= eh ea ES at le qdadt s'aantreH “atraigi A YW ielel Wi eliotn cravewlt ait to aaa lavipoliedon' vttoteht “hao bee oboe iohee mh hy het oe LOOT wt OE ai a Pa itdthosaant sintl-arpalM oat 2 --«-- =. dhgoonon aNpAiM sonttl-cumleebaAg sas nea ooanios spat dbalt_cetmedadsti ee SuoWe we / Nah a oT ofp puokeg alafiniry maine iS Aytap syremoun sfayl UL ayferryc ae au bB euoy yasRe sf" + &i T Lt off bedi ey phate f te ae hag : S spr Sumy fo] Yr aq diate qpounyvan W 72 dy Z pony np a0 puefyznk 2-9 Syd Beryat 27d TH siaenor zed perK ern rey ep %, YO, Patyt YL apanyinf mp +4 “SH AL AIHA FHL FO dvAv | OUVW FISAL SIH NIWAWIGTT NHOI Aa GIS WAAV AL AOL 206 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The Sanson map of 1656 pictures the ‘‘Eriechronons ou N. du Chat” south of Lake Erie and west of Virginia and Maryland, although the cartographic distortion is such that this latter fact may not be signifi- cant. A detailed discussion of the problems involved in attempting to draw conclusions concerning the position of the Erie by inspection of early cartographical representations has been given by Marion E. White (1961, pp. 40-49), who calls attention to a very important clue. The so-called Bernou map of c. 1680 shows a legend below Lake Erie (here called ‘Lac Teiocha-rontiong’’) reading, This Lake is not Lake Erie, as people usually call it. Erie is a part of Chesa- peake Bay in Virginia, where the Eries have always lived. 5. BLACK MINQUA-ERIE CONNECTION As with the Massawomeck, there exists no indisputable evidence to link the Black Minqua to the Erie. There does exist, however, a considerable amount of elusive and circumstantial data which, when considered in toto, does seem to render such a conclusion at least plausible. First of all, it is apparent that just as the Massawomeck of the Smith and Lederer maps seem to fall within Erie territory, so do the Black Minqua of Herrman’s map. Second, there seems to be some relation between the name Erie or Eriehronon and the name Arrigahaga as used by Printz. In this connection it should be noted that Lewis Evans used the form Erigas on his map of 1755 (Evans, 1939, p. 13). Above and beyond this there seem to be numerous parallels between the history of the Erie and the Black Minqua which, when taken together, seem to be more than mere coincidence. This best can be seen in a comparison of the Erie and Black Minqua histories insofar as we can reconstruct them from the sources. According to the French, the Erie—Iroquois war began shortly after the Iroquois defeat of the northern Algonquian, the Huron, the Tionontati, and the Neutral; that is, between 1651 and 1653. The Iroquois account of the cause for this war, as given to the French at Onondaga, was that The Cat Nation had sent thirty Ambassadors to Sonnontouan, to confirm the peace between them; but it happened, by some unexpected accident, that a Sonnontouahronnon [Seneca] was killed by a man of the Cat Nation. This murder so incensed the Sonnontouahronnons, that they put to death the Ambas- sadors in their hands, except five who escaped. Hence, war was kindled between these two Nations, and each strove to capture and burn more prisoners than its opponent. [De Quens, 1657; in Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 42, p. 177.] sho] AP APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 207 The Onondaga also blamed the Huron for this, claiming that those who took refuge among the Erie “stirred up this war which is filling the Iroquois with alarm” (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 41, p. 83). Whatever the cause, the war started unauspiciously for the New York Iroquois. In 1653, apparently, the Erie took and burned a frontier town of the Seneca, cut to pieces the rearguard of 80 picked men of a Seneca expedition returning from Lake Huron, and captured and burned a great captain of the Seneca and one of the Onondaga (ibid., vol. 41, p. 81). Curiously, the French accounts of this early phase of the Erie—Iroquois war make no mention of the Susquehan- nock or Andaste, but Printz wrote in this year, as previously men- tioned, that war had broken out between the Arrigahaga and Sus- quahannoer. In 1654 the Iroquois secured their rear by concluding a peace treaty with the French, at which time they announced: Our young men will wage no more warfare with the French; but, as they are too warlike to abandon that pursuit, you are to understand that we are going to wage a war against the Ehriehronnons (the Cat Nation), and this very summer we shall lead an army thither. The earth is trembling yonder, and here all is quiet. [Le Mercier, 1655; in Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 41, p. 75.] While preparations were being made for this invasion, Erie war parties still lurked around the New York towns, even ambushing three men within 1 day’s journey of Onondaga (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 41, p. 75). The Iroquois attack, when it finally was carried out in August of 1654, was massive, involving some 700 (or 1,200) men. After its entry into their country the northern Ehriehronon abandoned their frontier towns and retreated some 5 days before taking refuge in the fortified town of Rique, inhabited by the Riquehronnon (Rigueron- non), who apparently had just experienced an attack by the ‘‘Anda- stogueronnons” or Susquehannock. Here the Erie beat off the initial attacks in heavy fighting. Finally, carrying their canoes before them as shields and then using them as ladders to scale the walls, the Iroquois stormed the fort. The Eries’ gunpowder supply be- coming exhausted, the defense collapsed, and the defenders were massacred to the number of 2,000 men, plus women and children (ibid., vol. 41, p. 121; vol. 42, pp. 178-179, 187-188, 191, 195; vol. 45, p. 209). At approximately the same time, that is, in 1654 or 1655, a battle took place between a party of Black Minqua and Englishmen from Virginia in which the latter suffered a defeat of some proportions. I also want to mention briefly what happened among the Black Minquas further in the [interior of the] country, with 15 individual Englishmen whom they had taken prisoners; from which one can learn of the horrible cruelty of the Minquas. 208 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 It happened that the English of Virginia carried on war against these Minquas. When the English now came to these savages, marching 2 or 3 hundred men strong, with a few [small] field cannon, they pitched their camp a short distance from the dwellings of the above-mentioned savages. But these savages are somewhat cleverer in building, than our own river Indians who live closer to us, using pali- sades around their dwellings. Therefore the English did not run, precipitously upon them, but first fired a few cannon [balls against their fort]. Then the English did not know a word about it, before the savages had surrounded the English, were in their rear and drove them into flight, killing some of them and brought home with them 15 prisoners, whom they later, after a lapse of a few days, mar- tyred to death wretchedly and unchristianlike. Because some of these prisoners were of noble birth and of some importance and value, the English offered for each one of them a few 100 florins for ransom; but the savages did not care for ransom or a sum of money, but seemed to be more anxious to exact their revenge and satisfy their anger on these poor prisoners. They therefore erected a high plat- form, placing large piles of bark below it, upon which they poured all kinds of pitch, bear-fat, et talia, etc. Through this they wanted to indicate that whatso- ever kind of drink the English wanted to pour out for them, that they themselves would now have to imbibe. They also erected a post in the earth for each pris- oner, around which they also placed piles of bark and poured fat thereupon, just as has been stated before. Then they took the prisoners out to undergo their punishment. They first brought them up on the high framework, who were bound around their waists with long slender iron chains; then they put fire to the bark, lying below, and later, shoved one prisoner after the other down into the fire, which burnt with terrible violence. When they had been tormented somewhat in this fire, then the savages pulled them out of it. Then they bound the said prisoners to the above-mentioned poles, put fire also to that bark in which they had to dance, until they were practically halt roasted. Nor did they want that any of them should lose his life in the fire, because they wanted to inflict upon them as much suffering as possible; wherefore they pulled the prisoners out again, placing them in front of themselves. Then they brought forth their doctor of medicine, whom they otherwise called the devil-chaser (why he has this name we will learn to know in the next following chapter). He took his knife and cut each one of the prisoners right over the fore- head from one ear to the other, then he took the skin and pulled it backward on the neck or the throat, then he cut the tongue out of the mouths of all the prisoners. On one of them he wanted to prove his mastery and cure him again, if there was any one of them who wanted to live, and then that one would escape further punishment, which his other comrades still would have to stand, but there was no one of them who wanted to live. Then the devil-chaser cut all the fingers off the prisoners and threaded them upon a string, which he delivered to their sachem or ruler, who tied them around his neck. When this was done the devil- chaser cut all their toes off, which he also delivered to their sachem. These he tied around his legs at the knees. The sachem carried them on his body until the flesh rotted away, but when the flesh had rotted off and dried away, he scrapes the bones clean and white, when he threads them anew upon a ribbon and carries them afterwards continually on his body, to show his great courage,—the greater skeleton bones these Minqua sachems carry, the braver warriors they are supposed tobe. Then they brought forth fifteen bundles of reeds, like reeds here in Sweden, which were saturated in fat. Of these they bound a bundle on the back of each prisoner, turned them towards Virginia, set fire to the bundles, and told them to run home again, where they had come from, and relate to their countrymen, how well they had been treated and entertained among the Black Minquas. They Ano Bo} we APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 209 also sent good guides with them, whom the boys followed with a great noise, shot at them with their quarrels [blunt arrows] until the one fell here and the other there. Such a miserable departure and end these poor people had, from which we can observe the awful cruelty of the Minquas. These Minquas are of two kinds, Black and White Minquas. The author of the preceding passage, Peter Lindestrém, follows it with another indicating some familiarity with these Indians. Besides I further want to relate about the bloodletting of the savages and their wonderful medicines, which i have seen at least a hundred times among these savages. When the savage undertakes to march a long journey, the first day he has marched, in the evening, when he strikes camp, he makes up a fire, takes a piece of flint as long as a finger which he has prepared and fitted for this purpose, sharp as a razor, with this he cuts himself all over his body into the deepest flesh, on his arms, thighs and legs, the depth of a finger, according to the depth of the flesh, deeper or less, standing then before the fire to shake off the blood, which runs off him, as if one had butchered an ox. When he has allowed as much blood to run off as he thinks proper, then he takes a kind of ointment, which he smears over his body, wherever he has cut himself. Before morning, it is healed over and run together, and blue streaks remain after it just as when one burns oneself with powder, wherefore the savages appear entirely striped and streaky and especially the Minquas. This is now [something about] the blood letting and cutting of the savages, from which one can observe that they are patient and not tinder-skinned. When now the savage has thus removed some blood, he may march and run as fast and as far as he wants to, he will not tire. [Lindestrém, 1925, pp. 241-245.] At almost the same time (1656) the records of the Virginia Assembly report that, . . Many western and inland Indians are drawne from the mountaynes, and lately sett downe near the falls of James river, to the number of six or seaven hundred. [Virginia Assembly, 1823 a, p. 402.] After due consideration the Assembly resolved to remove these foreign Indians from the borders of the colony by peaceful or martial means, charging Col. Edward Hill to carry out the resolution and to enlist the aid of the Pamunkey chief Tottopottomoy. From later sources which describe Tottopottomoy’s defeat and death at the hands of these Indians it would appear that they were Siouan and not Iroquoian. However, these two battles—with the Black Minqua and with the Nahyssan and Mahock—almost certainly are not unrelated (see “Richahecrian-Black Minqua Connection’’). Decisive as their capture of Rique may have been, it did not end entirely the Erie threat, for in September of 1655 the Onondaga delegation to Quebec, “representing all the upper Iroquois Nations,” asked ‘for French Soldiers, to defend their villages against the inroads of the Cat Nation, with whom they are at open war” (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol 42, pp. 49, 53). By 1656, however, the tide of war had gone against the Erie to such an extent that some surrendered vol- untarily, and the Iroquois again proclaimed their total destruction 210 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 (ibid., vol. 44, p. 153). The French Jesuit De Lamberville, writing from the Seneca country in 1682, reported that another surrender took place about 1672, in which Six hundred men, women, and children of the nation of the chats, near Virginia, surrendered voluntarily, for fear that they might be compelled to do so by force. [De Lamberville, 1682; in ibid., vol. 62, p. 71.] A similar statement, apparently referring to an event which occurred about 1680, was made to the Governor of Maryland in 1681 by an Onondaga and a Cayuga. Another Nation, called the Black Mingoes, are joined with the Sinnondowannes, who are the right Senecas; that they were so informed by some New York Indians whom they met as they were coming down. They told them that the Black Mingoes, in the coming to the Sinniquos, were pursed by some Southern Indians, set upon and routed, several of them taken and bound, till the Sinniquos came unto their relief. [Hanna, 1911, p. 16.] One additional type of evidence which may be cited in support of the proposition that the Erie were one and the same with the Black Mingua is the fact that, while the historical sources indicate that both of these groups were ‘‘destroyed” by the Iroquois, the Iroquois themselves claimed only to have destroyed the Erie in this general area at this time. This argument rests, of course, on the assumption that if the Black Minqua had not been identical with the Erie the Iroquois would have made the fact clear. One thing is indisputable: the Iroquois, and particularly the Seneca, were never particularly modest in their claims of martial prowess and triumphs. 6. ARRIGAHAGA-ERIE CONNECTION Evidence for the identity of the Arrigahaga, mentioned by Printz, with the Erie is largely linguistic. The material already considered indicates that the name ‘‘Arrigahaga’”’ is used in such a context that its synonymy with the name ‘‘Black Minqua”’ is indicated strongly; the possible identity of the Black Minqua with the Erie has also been discussed. Above and beyond this it can be argued that the term ‘“‘Arrigahaga”’ is a cognate of the term ‘“Hrie,’’ having an Iroquoian stem meaning ‘‘people of” (Hodge, 1907, pt. 1, p. 921). The evidence for this derives, first of all, from Lewis Evans’ use of the form ‘‘Eriga” as a variant for ‘‘Erie’’ in the commentary published in connection with his map of 1755. The second line of evidence de- rives from the known use of the ending ‘‘-haga,’”’ as well as cognate forms, in known Iroquois tribal names (Hodge, 1907, pt. 1, pp. 224, 924: 1910, pt. 2, pp. 87, 507-508): Aniakahaka-Caughnawaga name for Mohawk Kaniengehaga-Mohawk name for Mohawk Kuyukuhaga-Mohawk, for Cayuga An 0] 2 APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 21] Kuenyuguhaka-Tuscarora, for Cayuga Cheroenhaka-Nottaway, for Nottaway Tshotinondowaga-Seneca, for Seneca No"towaka-Tuscarora, for Seneca Ani- Nundawegi-Cherokee, for Seneca From this evidence it would seem that the original form of the name given by Printz was probably “Erigahaga.”’ 7. ARRIGAHAGA-BLACK MINQUA CONNECTION Direct evidence for the identity of the names Arrigahaga and Black Minqua stems from the occurrence of these names in cir- cumstances indicating their synonymy. This material has already been discussed under ‘‘Massawomeck-Black Minqua Connection.” 8. RICHAHECRIAN-BLACK MINQUA CONNECTION The identity of the Richahecrian Indians who invaded Virginia in 1655 long has been the subject of controversy and discussion. This group has been associated, on different grounds, with the Erie, Cherokee, Westo, Huchi, and Yuchi. However, few of these studies have been based upon the original documentary sources and several most crucial references have been ignored completely. The earliest document pertinent to the Richahecrian question con- sists of an Act passed by the Virginia Assembly on March 10, 1656, and preserved in the Randolph Manuscript (Virginia Assembly [1642-62]) in the Jefferson Collection of the Library of Congress, and published in Hening’s “Statutes at Large.” Act XV Whereas information hath bin given that many western and inland Indians are drawne from the mountaynes, and lately sett downe near the falls of James river, to the number of six or seaven hundred, whereby vpon many seuerall considerations being had, it is conceived greate danger might ensue to this collony, This Assembly therefore do think fitt to resolve that these new come Indians be in noe sort suffered to seate themselves there, or any place near vs it having cost so much blood to expell and extirpate those perfidious and treacherous Indians which were there formerly, It being so apt a place to invade vs and within those lymitts which in a just warr were formerly conquered by us, and by vs reserved at the last conclusion of peace with the Indians, In persuance whereof therefore and due respect to our own safety, Be it enacted by this present Grand Assembly, That the two vpper countyes, vnder the command of Coll. Edward Hill, do presently send forth a party of 100 men at least and that they shall endeavour to remove the said new come Indians without makeing warr if it may be, only in a case of their own defence, alsoe strictly requireing the assistance of all the neighbouring Indians to aid them to that purpose, as being part of the articles of peace concluded with vs, and faileing therein to look duely to the safety of all the English of those parts by fixing of their arms and provideing ammunition, and that they have recourse the Governour and Councill for further direction therein. And the Governour and Councill are desired to send messages to Tottopottomoy and the Chickahomynies 212 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 and other Indians and to treate with them as they in theire wisdoms and dis- cretions shall think fitt [Hening, 1819-1823, vol. 1, pp. 402-403]. An action of this same Assembly passing sentence upon Colonel Hill, for some ‘‘weakness” during a “Jate expedition against the Indians,” which is usually interpreted as constituting a sequel to the passage just quoted, was passed down between March and December 1656. Debate and consideration of the charge and defence of Coll. Edward Hill by the general and unanimous assent and vote of both houses without any con- tradiction hath been found guilty of these crimes and weaknesses there alleaged against him and for the vindicating themselves from any imputation of his crimes and deficiencies have ordered that his present suspension from all offices military and civil that he hath had or may have continue & be made uncapable of resti- tution but by an Assembly, and that he be at the charge of whats alreadie expended in procuring a peace with the Richahecrians and if the Governour or Councel shall find any nearer way to effecting thereof that it shall be acted at the said Coll. Hills proper cost and charge (Bland MS., in Hening, 1809-23, vol. 1, pp. 422-423). In addition we must consider Lindestrém’s description of an English defeat at the hands of the Black Minqua, and two passages appearing in Lionel Gatford’s ‘Publick Good without Private In- terest. . .” (1657). The Planters have turned some of the Indians out of their places of abode and subsistence, after that the Indians have submitted to the Colony, and to their government, and have taken up their own lands, after the custom, used by the Colony. As they did otherwise also very unchristianly requite the service which one of the Indian kings did them in fighting against other Indians, that were presumed to be enemies to the English, and to draw towards them, to do them mischief. For that, when the said King desirous to show his fidelity to the English, if not in obedience to some of their commander’s orders, did adventure too far with his own Indians, in the pursuit of those other Indians, and thereby lost his life in that action, as some report, though others thought him to be taken alive by the enemies. His wife and children that were by him, at his expiring, recommended to the care of the English . . . were so far from receiving the favour and kind usage, merited by their father, that they were wholly neglected, and exposed to shift for themselves. And though it be alleged by some, as to the former part of this grievance, that the portion of land which was taken from the said King, before his death, by an English colonel was acknowledged openly in court, yet ’tis generally believed, and by some stoutly asserted, that the said King was affrighted and threatened into that acknowledgement by the said Colonel. ... . . . The Planters [of Virginia] did lately, viz. Anno 1656, (when a numerous people of the Indians, more remote from the Colonie, came down to treat with the English about setling of a Peace, and withall a liberty of trade with them) most perfidiously and barbarously (after a declaration of their desires and in- tention) murther five of their Kings, that came in expectation of a better reception) [sic] and bronght [sic] much Beaver with them to begin the intercourse of the commerce. [Gatford, 1657, pp. 6-8.] eenee td APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 213 From a comment made by Lederer, this Indian chief would seem to be Tottopottomoy and the battle in question apparently took place above the junction of Pamunkey River with Totopotomoy Creek. The next day falling into Marish grounds between Pemaeoncock and the head of the River Matapeneugh, the heaviness of the way obliged me to cross Pemaeon- The Yeads of thefe twa Rivers, Proceed and ifr forth out of low Marfhy grad, and not out of 4ills or Mountaines as other River doe, pe é ¥ y40¢ fo samoicey- 27 MIONVHVdLV YN 7): to] v Mar 8.—Facsimile of detail of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673. 214 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 cock, where its North and South branch (called Ackmick) joyn in one. In the Peninsula made by these two branches, a great Indian king called Tottopottoma was heretofore slain in battle, fighting for the Christians against the Mahocks and Nahyssans, from whence it retains his name to this day. [Lederer, 1958, p. 10.] Lederer depicts the site of this battle on his map of 1672 with the legend “‘Tottopotoma” at the fork in question. Since this name appears in a similar location on the Augustine Herrman map of 1673 (map 8) it would seem that it was generally believed by the con- temporary Virginians that Tottopotomoy met his death here. From a reference appearing in the Maryland Archives for 1661 it would appear that the Nahyssans mentioned by Lederer were still in northern Virginia at this time. This reference derives from the consideration given by the General Assembly of Maryland, sitting at St. John’s in St. Marys County, to a petition by the Susquehannock Indians for assistance and aid. Tuesday the 23th April At a Grand Comittee of both howses It is ordered M.t Edward Lloyd and M.t John Bateman Coll. W.™ Evans M.t Thomas Manning M.' John Brewer and M.* George Vtye doe drawe up an Acte impowring the Governor and Councell in the Intervall Betweene this As- sembly and the next to rayse what forces they in their discrecon shall finde necessary for the Assistance of the Sasquehannough Indians ag.t the Cynaco or Naijssone Indians that have lately killed some English in Patapsco River [which runs into Baltimore Bay] that they doe rayse by equall Assessment vpon the Freemen of this Province and the Charge of the warre and that the said Comittee doe agree and ascertayne the wages and pay of the Souldiery in the Acte and that they doe meete by two of the Clock in the Afternoone to drawe up the Acte Thursday the second of May An acte Impowring the Governor and Councell to Rayse forces and maytayne a Warre without the Province and to ayde the Sasquehannough Indians Whereas it doth appeare to this p'sent Generall Assembly that this Province is in Eminent danger by a warre begun in itt by some forreigne Indians as it hath been made appeare by credible informacon given of a person lately killd and of others that are probably cutt off by these forreign Indians And that in humane probabillity our neighbour Indians the Sasquehannoughs are a Bullwarke and Security of the Northerne parts of this Province And that by former treatyes with that nacon they have very much assured vs of their affeccons and friendship And that they expected the like from vs, And by their treatyes it was agreed Assistance should be granted to each oth[er] in tyme of danger And vpon their severall late Applicacons to vs to that purpose Ayde hath been promis[ed] them accordingly. It is Enacted and be it enacted [by] the Lord Proprietary of this Province by and with the advice and consent of the vpper and lower howJ[se] of this ptsent General [Assembly] that the Governor with the advice and consent of the Councell ame ko}? APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 215 have power to leauy and rayse by presse or otherwise fifty able men with Armes and Provision and all things necessary for them to be sent to the Sasquehannough Forte for the end aforesaid And the proporcon of the said Souldiers to be raysed out of the severall Countyes as followeth. (vizt) out of the County of St. Marys Eleaven, out of Calvert County fifteene out of Charles County seaven, out of Anne Arrundell eleaven out of Kent three, with one Interpreter a Captaine and a Chirurgeon. And for the pay of the officers and Souldiers aforesaid to be proporconed as followeth vntill the Souldiers retourne To the Comander in cheife Six hundred pounds of tobacco in Caske p moneth To the Interpreter six hundred p moneth to the Leiuetennant four hundred p moneth To the Serjeant three hundred p moneth and to the Chirurgeon foure hundred p moneth and to every private Souldier two hundred and fifty pmoneth. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid that for the defraying of the Charge of the said warre and all charges incident to itt That the Governor and Councell are hereby im- powred to leauy by waye of Assessment p pole according to the vsuall Custome out of this Province And in the Intervall of Assemblyes to rayse what forces they in their disrecon shall thinke necessary against the Cynacs or Nayssone Indians or any other Indians that shall be found to have killed any of the In- habitants of this Province or that have or shall disturbe the peace thereof. And the Charges to be defrayed as aforsaid This Acte to continue and be in force for two yeares or the next Generall Assembly which shall first happen The Lower howse The Vpper howse haue Assented haue Assented Will Bretton Clk John Gittings Clre: (General Assembly of Maryland, Upper House, 1883). The passage ‘‘Cynaco or Naijsonne Indians” in one instance, and that of ‘“Cynacs or Nayssone Indians or any other Indians” in another, can be interpreted to mean either that the name ‘‘Cynaco” was a synonym for the name ‘“‘Naijssone’”’ or ‘‘Nayssone,” or that the Mary- land officials and the Susquehannock were uncertain which of two groups of Indians may have been involved in the incident at Patapsco River. However, the term ‘‘Cynaco” or ‘‘Cynacs” has numerous cognates including ‘‘Cinnigos,” ‘“‘Cynikers,”’ ‘“Sannagers,”’ ‘“Senacaes,”’ “Senequas,”’ ‘‘Seneques,” ‘‘Senneks,” ‘Sinacks,” ‘Sinica,” ‘Sin- nagers,” ‘Syneck,” and ‘‘Synicks’” (Hodge, 1910, pt. 2, pp. 507- 508), all of which are variants of a general Dutch and English term for Jroquoian-speaking peoples (and thereby similar to the Swedish term ‘‘Minqua’”’). According to Hewitt, the term ‘‘Seneca”’ became “the tribal name of the Seneca by a process of elimination which excluded from the group and from the connotation of the general name the nearer tribes as each with its own proper native name be- came known to the Europeans” (Hodge, 1910, pt. 2, p. 504). It easily can be demonstrated, however, that the Nahyssan were a Siouan-speaking group, and that they are therefore separate and 682-611—64—18 216 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 distinct from a ‘‘Cynaco” group. Lederer, in his discourse on his second expedition of 1670, states: From the fifth, which was Sunday, until the ninth of June, I travelled through difficult ways, without seeing any Town or Indian; and then I arrived at Sapon, a Village of the Nahyssans, about an hundred miles distant from Mahock, scituate upon a branch of Shawan, alias Rorenock-River; and though I had just cause to fear these Indians, because they had been in continual Hostility with the Chris- tians for ten years before; yet presuming that the Truck which I carried with me would procure my welcome, I adventured to put my self into their power,.. . « [Lederer, 1958, pp. 22—23.] In a separate passage Lederer associates these ‘‘Saponi” or “Na- hyssan”’ with a number of other tribes or groups. These parts [the Piedmont of Virginia] were formerly possessed by the Taccz alias Dogi; but they are extinct; and the Indians now seated here, are distin- guished into the several Nations of Mahoc, Nuntaneuck, alias Nuntaly, Nahyssan, Sapon, Monagog, Mongoack, Akenatzy, and Monakin, & c. One language is common to them all, though they differ in Dialects. [Lederer, 1958, p. 10.] At a considerably later date, Alexander Spotswood (1882-85, vol. 2, p. 88), Governor of the Virginia Colony, stated: . . . Ll engaged the Saponie, Oconeechee, Stuckanox and Tottero Indians, (being a people speaking much the same language, and therefore confederated together tho’ still preserving their different Rules). At a still later date William Byrd, while helping survey the dividing line between Virginia and North Carolina, recorded a number of Saponi names for creeks emptying into the middle Roanoke, as follows: Moni-seep or Shallow Water; Massamoni or Paint-Creek; Ohimpa-moni, Ohimpamony, or Jumping [Fish?] or Fishing Creek; Yaypatsco, Yapatoco, or Beaver Creek; Tewahominy, Tewaw-hom- mini, Tewakominy, or Tuskarooda Creek; Hicootomony, or Turkey Buzzard River; Wicco-quoi or Rock Creek. An analysis of these names (see table 1) clearly indicates their Siouan nature. In addi- tion, Tutelo has been firmly established, through more recent evi- dence, as being Siouan (Byrd, 1929, pp. 158, 164-166, 168; Sturtevant, 1958). From this analysis it would seem that the Maryland General As- sembly of 1661 was apprehensive of attack by either a Siouan or an Iroquoian group. It also is obvious that the battle in which Tot- topottomoy met his death was separate and distinct from that in which the English of Virginia met defeat at the hands of the Black Minqua. The question thus arises as to whether all the statements which generally have been taken to refer to the ‘“Richahecrian” or ‘‘Nahyssan” and “Mahock’’ defeat of the English refer to two separate battles or to one. Anthrop. Pap. "No. 70]. APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 217 TaBLE 1.—Comparative analysis of Byrd’s Saponi place names } English Byrd’s Saponi Tutelo Dakota Hidatsa Sialloweesee oe sees seep . Weber ees 2S moni- mani mini ee midi Greg Be Bes tok -moni ee : TRAC ies = Bs ee oe (Ra ke taksita P am watpa Jumps 262 sS220 ee eres ? tp eee Cera ON A Sh eh att ga wihoi, hoghan mua bisok4 Beavers ot Qube cis. Yayp Yaop tcapa mirapa Yapa Turkey Buzzard___| Hicooto- Pipeane eo! =, Pee Ue re WAT mayutkai wakiyedai wayotkai Barnbee ae oe ee ee massa- ROC ere eat bete aw wicco(?) 1 Hale (1884), Frachtenburg (1913), Byrd (1929, pp. 164-169). The statements which actually exist are as follows: Statement A.—A group of ‘‘western and inland Indians,” 600 or 700 strong, is reported in the spring of 1656 to have moved from the mountains and established itself at the falls of the James. Colonel Hill is sent to persuade its members to remove, or to force them to do this. Tottopottomoy and other Indians are asked to give aid. These ‘western and inland Indians” are not named. Statement B.—An act passed by the Virginia Assembly and recorded at the close of its session in December 1656 cashiers Colonel Hill for his ‘‘erimes and weaknesses.” He also is ordered to bear the cost of securing a peace with the Richahecrians. Statement C_—During this same session the Virginia Assembly con- sidered a number of petitions for “compensation for losses suffered during the late expedition” against the Indians (Virginia Assembly (1656)). These petitions were not referred to by later historians. Mention is also made of the former careless killing of Indians. Statement D.—According to Gatford, writing in 1657, the Virginia colonists murdered five Indian ambassadors who had ‘‘come down to treat with the English about setling of a Peace, and withall a liberty of trade with them” in 1656. Beaver is mentioned. Statement H.—Gatford also states that an Indian King, name not given, had advanced too rashly in the pursuit of ‘other Indians” and was either killed or captured. 218 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Statement F.—Lederer, writing in 1672, stated that the Indian King Tottopottomoy was killed in a battle with the Mahocks and Nahyssan on the Pamunkey River. This location is confirmed on the Herrman map. Statement G.—Lindestrém, probably citing an incident which occurred before his departure from America in October 1655, describes an English defeat at the hands of the Black Minqua. Statement H.—The Maryland General Assembly and the Susque- hannock Indians express concern in 1661 about an Indian group, either Nahyssan or ‘“Cynaco,” which is threatening the borders of the colony near present-day Baltimore. From the evidence given in these eight references it would seem that Statement G (from Lindestrém) indisputably refers to an Iroquoian eroup, while Statement F indisputably refers to a Siouan group. It also seems probable (though not indisputable) that Statements A and E also can be associated with this Siouan group. Since the Indian group in Statement E is distinguished from that in D, this later statement may apply to the Black Minqua of G. We thus have Statements B and C of uncertain attribution, and we have tentatively established that: (1) The group which established itself at the falls of the James and defeated Tottopotomoy on the Pamunkey was comprised of the Mahock and Nahyssan. (2) The Black Minqua defeated the English and later suffered the loss of five ambassadors. From internal evidence—namely, the fact that Lindestrém left in October of 1655 (Lindestrém, 1925, p. xxiv), as well as the fact that Gatford dates the murder of the ambassadors as occurring in 1656— the order of events would seem to be as indicated in (2) above. This gives us a clue as to why Hill was cashiered. Considering the case in historical perspective, it seems unlikely that Hill would have been prosecuted merely because Tottopottomoy had disobeyed orders and had been cut off, or even if he had been defeated in an open battle with the Black Minqua. (Hill does not seem to have suffered losses in the Tottopottomoy episode, and Indian allies are not mentioned in Lindestrém’s account.) What might have been sufficient and full reason for a court-martial may have been Hill’s conduct when the Indian ambassadors were murdered, which presumably caused a new outbreak of the war. These ambassadors were ‘‘Richahecrians”’ but quite likely they were also Black Minqua. The fact that Hill was not cashiered for weaknesses displayed in connection with the Mahock and Nahyssan is significant. Statement B, and possibly Statement C as well, probably is to be associated with the Black Minqua. This interpretation of an important episode in Virginia history must ae PoT P APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 219 be compared with the more usual version which seems to have origi- nated with Burk. Whilst the assembly were employed in these wise and benevolent projects, information was received that a body of inland or mountain Indians, to the num- ber of six or seven hundred, had seated themselves near the falls of James river, apparently with the intention of forming a regular settlement. Some movements were at this time noticed among the neighboring tribes, which seemed to indicate something like a concert and correspondence with these strangers; and the minds of the colonists always alive to, and apprehensive of, Indian treachery, were unusually agitated on this occasion. The place these Indians had made choice of, was another source of disquiet. It was strong and difficult of access, alike calculated for offensive and defensive operations; and they recollected the immense trouble and expence that had been incurred in extirpating the tribes which formerly dwelt in that place. At the conclusion of the last peace with the Indians, this station was considered so important, that its cession was insisted on, as the main pledge and security of peace; and it had hitherto continued unoccupied as a sort of barrier to the frontiers in that direction. Under all these circum- stances, they could not see it, without anxiety, occupied by a powerful band of hardy warriors, who perhaps were only the advance guard of a more formidable and extensive emigration. The measures of the assembly in removing this ground of alarm were prompt and vigourous.* [fn. printing Virginia Assembly (1642-1662) pp. 111-112]. One hundred men were dispatched under the command of Edward Hill, to dislodge the intruders. His instructions were to use peaceable means only, unless com- pelled by necessity; and to require the assistance of all the neighboring Indians, according to the articles of the late treaty. ‘The governor was at the same time directed to send an account of this invasion to Totopotomoi, and desire that his influence should be exerted in procuring the immediate co-operation of the friendly tribes. It is difficult to form any satisfactory conjecture as to the motives of the extraor- dinary movement directly against the stream and tide of emigration. It was certainly a bold step to descend into the plain, in the face of an enemy, whose power they must have heard of, and which could scarcely fail of inspiring astonish- ment and awe; and to take the place of warlike tribes, whom the skill and destruc- tive weapons of the whites had lately exterminated and swept away. The scanty materials which the state records have preserved of Indian affairs, throw little light on this subject. But though they do not present this people in all the various relations of peace and war, we generally see them in one point of view at least; and are often able by induction, to supply a considerable range of incident and reflection. In the second session of assembly colonel Edward Hill was cashiered, and declared incapable of holding any office, civil or military, within the colony, for improper conduct in an expedition against the Richahe- crians. We are not told whether the offence of Hill was cowardice, or a willful disobedience of the instructions he had received. There is however reason to believe, that he was defeated, and that the Rechahecrians maintained themselves in their position at the falls by force; for the governor and council were directed by the assembly to make a peace with this people, and they further directed that the monies which were expended for this purpose, should be levied on the proper estate of Hill.* [fn. printing Virginia Assembly, et al (1606-92), p. 200]. From other sources almost equally authentic, we learn that the aid demanded of the Indians was granted without hesitation. Topopotomoi marched at the head of an hundred warriors of the tribe of Pamunkey, and fell with the greater 220 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 part of his followers, gallantly fighting in this obstinate and bloody encounter (Burk, 1804-16, vol. 2, pp. 104-107). Burk’s account seems to have constituted the primary source for most later authors writing on this battle, although a few also have employed Gatford or have cited Hening’s printing of the Virginia Assembly documents. Lindestrém’s account of a battle between the English of Virginia and the Black Minqua, as well as the material from the Maryland Archives and part of Lederer’s statements, has generally been ignored. 9. RICHAHECRIAN-ERIE CONNECTION The identity of the Richahecrian with the Erie is based, in part, upon De Lamberville’s comment that ‘‘six hundred men, women, and children of the nation of the chats” once lived “near Virginia,” and, in part, upon some degree of similarity in the names. The latter evidence is not completely convincing, but it is still suggestive. Richalbemncrianees === a see English (Va. Assembly, 1656) Armcahapaee. Site oe Gils Swedish (Printz, 1653) irgead £0 eget ee ea English (Evans, 1755) Priehwts tronons. 52 ued Huron (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 18, p. 235) Ericehte!rononl) J28 0 9uL Iroquois (ibid., vol. 21, p. 191) Erieh ONO 29 ela fe EE Troquois (ibid., vol. 41, p. 81) Rigue FOnNom es uo. £ Iroquois (ibid., vol. 47, p. 59; vol. 50, p. 117) Rbie + sarrhonon = 2222 2S Huron (ibid., vol. 8, p. 115) 10. RICHAHECRIAN-RICKOHOCKAN CONNECTION In his report on his second expedition of 1670, Lederer stated, in connection with a visit at ‘““Akenatzy”’: . .. I have heard several Indians testifie, that the Nation of the Rickohockans, who dwell not far to the Westward of the Apalataean Mountains, are seated upon a Land, as they term it, of great Waves; by which I suppose they mean the sea-shore. The next day after my arrival at Akenatzy, a Rickohockan Ambassadour, attended by five Indians, whose faces were coloured with Auripigmentum [‘‘gold paint’’] (in which Mineral these parts do much abound) was received, and that night invited to a Ball of their fashion; but in the height of their mirth and dancing, by a smoke contrived for that purpose, the Room was suddenly darkned, and for what cause I know not, the Rickohockan and his Retinue barbarously murthered. [Lederer, 1958, p. 26.] Lederer also shows the ‘‘Rickohokans” on his map of 1672 as being west of the present-day site of Roanoke, Va., and apparently west of the Great Valley of Virginia on the New River. This location is also due west of the principal Virginia settlements of 1656 and only a short distance, therefore, from what was then taken as the borders Po» APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 22] of the colony. The Rickohockans were thus close enough to the Virginia Colony to have been the Richahecrians. The similarity in names is also suggestive. 11. RICKOHOCKAN-ERIE CONNECTION The identity of the Rickohockan with the Erie is suggested by the general similarity of geographical location and by linguistic evidence. The first name easily can be broken down into ‘‘ricko-” and ‘‘hockan’”’ and compared to the name “Trigue” or “rique” in ‘“riquehronnon,”’ the Iroquois name for the Erie of Rique, and to the stem “haga” or ‘“‘haka’”’ meaning “people of.” Thus the name ‘‘Rickohokan”’ possibly can be interpreted as an Iroquois name meaning ‘‘People of Rique.’’ CONCLUSIONS From the material which has been considered here it is apparent that Iroquoian tribes played an important part in the early history of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, and that a particularly im- portant group in this respect included the Erie, Black Minqua, Z Map 9.—Protohistoric and early historic archeological phases of the Eastern United States. Aspects: 1, Mouse Creek; 2, Dallas; 3, Large Log; 4, Duck River; 5, Cumberland; 6, Kincaid; 7, Angel; 8, Late Fort Ancient; 9, Clover; 10, Iroquois; 1/1, Shenk Ferry; 12 , Allegheny; 18 ,Clarksville ;14, Hillsboro; 15, Pee Dee; 16, Potomac Creek. 222 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 or Massawomeck, who lived west of the Siouan tribes occupying the Virginia Piedmont. As far as we can determine, these Jroquoian tribes were established on the headwaters of the Potomac and on the upper Ohio drainage area. In light of this probable distribution it is pertinent to ask to what degree this does or does not show correlation to known archeological complexes in the area. The following protohistoric and early historic archeological units (see map 9) are pertinent in this connection: Mississipp1 PATTERN Middle Mississippi Phase Fort Ancient Aspect Madisonville Focus Anderson Focus Baum Focus Feurt Focus Clover Focus WooDLAND PATTERN Applachian Phase Shenk’s Ferry Aspect Shenk’s Ferry Focus Stewart Focus Monongahela Aspect Monongahela Focus Luray Focus Northeastern Phase Iroquois Aspect Madison Focus Genoa Fort Focus Factory Hollow Focus Lawson Focus Ripley Focus Whittlesey Focus Tioga Focus The distributions of the various aspects are shown on the accompany- ing series of maps (Griffin, 1943; 1952; MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 51-54; Mayer-Oakes, 1955; Morgan, 1952, pp. 93-98; Ritchie, 1951; Schmitt, 1952, pp. 62-70; Witthoft, 1951; 1955 (Personal communication)). The Fort Ancient Aspect, located in the middle Ohio Valley (see map 10), constitutes the most northeastern division of the Mississippi Pattern; a major cultural division centered in the Mississippi drainage and characterized by intensive agriculture, relatively superior pottery of distinctive style, palisaded fortified villages, flat-topped pyramids or cones, and town plazas. Culturally, the Mississippi Pattern stood in roughly the same relative position to the neighboring Woodland Pattern as ‘river bottom farming culture” stands to “hillbilly culture”’ in modern America. Although the Fort Ancient peoples were mar- ginal to the spectacular developments of the Mississippi Pattern as abi a APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 223 it evolved along the Mississippi and Tennessee Rivers, their culture still was unmistakably Mississippian and non-Woodland. Further- more, it had considerable homogeneity and occupied a large area including ‘‘a considerable proportion of southern Ohio, northern Kentucky, southeastern Indiana, and, to an as yet uncertain extent, the Kanawha Valley in West Virginia” (Griffin, 1943, pp. 206, 257- 260, 268-269, table x1v; 1952). Within the Fort Ancient Aspect a number of smaller and even more homogeneous units (foci) may be discerned. These foci (Madison- ville, Anderson, Baum, Feurt, Clover) seem to be distinguishable partly upon regional and partly upon temporal grounds. The Madi- sonville and Clover foci are the latest. Historic trade objects such as copper bells and snakes, copper and brass spirals, pendants and bells, iron adzes and beads, blue glass beads, etc. have been recovered from the Madisonville and Clover components. Commenting upon these remains, Griffin states that . it does not appear that any Fort Ancient focus had any considerable antiquity, and the probability is that the Madisonville Focus is only 250 to 350 years old. Even if the historic materials had not been buried in undoubted association with typical Madisonville artifacts in the Madisonville Component, this focus, on the basis of comparative analysis, could be shown to have been of no great age. [Griffin, 1943, p. 207.] Since, however, archeological investigation has failed to reveal any connection between the Fort Ancient Aspect and the later historic Indian cultures which occupied the region, it generally is concluded that the former disappeared before 1700, probably as a result of the documented Iroquois invasion of c. 1680. The Fort Ancient Aspect then represents a Middle Mississippi offshoot which merged culturally with a basic Woodland group already tinged with Mississippian traits. This process was interrupted by the pressure of the Iroquois from the northeast, and the southeastern Fort Ancient sites were modified as a result of the pressure of the Europeans on the Indian tribes of the Piedmont and mountain area of West Virginia and Virginia. The Madisonville Focus lasted until the period between 1670 and 1690, when its cultural unity was destroyed by the Iroquois and by the attraction of the Indians in the area to trading centers such as those of the IIlinois Valley, The Middle Atlantic Area, and the Southeast. ..- As already stated, it is doubtful that any specific historic tribe or tribes can be associated with the Fort Ancient culture. It is almost certain that it is not Iroquoian, and there is little or no archaeological or historical evidence that it is a Siouan relic. This seems to leave only one linguistic stock of sufficient promi- nence in the area which cannot be eliminated, namely, the Algonquian. [Griffin, 1943, p. 308.] Among the various Algonquian tribes the Shawnee have what may be considered the best claim to having resided in at least part of the Fort Ancient territory during the early historic (Griffin, 1943, pp. 120-121, table x1v; Hanna, 1911, vol. 1, pp. 119-126; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 170-171; Witthoft and Hunter, 1955). 224 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 COMPONENTS OF THE FORT ANCIENT ASPECT, MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI PHASE, MISSISSIPPI PATTERN Components Focus Reference 1. Campbell Island______-- Madisonville: teu 22 . 21) = Griffin, 19438. Dr aLCE label AMG cre ae ee ee ee (6 Ka ne eet pte a ey Neve RA fo) SPEin estan stcether ibe rar rye ee dors. SA eee = Do Ai? DeapliSrte seats nae 4 epee ret Oe teria SFr en ee Do Hee DDG aw Oe ee aoe we GOQe se fee ee eee Do Onl ED eae Oe a eS eee GO ra ore eee ae oe Do Ul 2eOhonlSarth: srt ellen rs Got. Vs Prise sl . a igret Do Se TasOh og oko e wees Sore a GOLe 2 ew ieee ee Do OF Madisonvilles2oe2 2 elses | oe GOeoe a ae oe eee Do iO; GDaepinis Pa nse esse eee cee dowel els 16 rans Do tie Mohmisshield2s 52 see esos CO (cas apie eee ee ee ae aE, Do {2c Sand hidgel—- == So ee loo es 10 eu gnc ap Seal heh Do. (SiwHoxehanm te. ase Pee al: ae doxeart seals ‘ayred Sh. Do. 4 Clay Weninmdis oe ged 3 C0 eNO ey ea eae ee, Do. TS sited Ci Pag ee = geen Dg aa Ea Qe ne oe eee Do. GaP ESIC KN GT tes ye ea | Se (6 (oes Reet gs ae gL Do lc ee IM eons pene ee ee Am @eTsOn Es see has ee ee Do ISIMStecle* Dam fe Leos seek OLee2 TS. Sule ees Do. OM Ma ylor seis Sh Se hee Ree peaches (OLA EY 24289 oy Pa aoe Do. ZO SAAn Gerson sa sad Joe eS alee (Olt ee ey Do DilesvoripAn cient]. ase aoe ‘okay int ent) Sat Do Dee ROVES se ee ee an ee (6 (0 nies pide eeepc rt ppee ape a Do 23" Stokesee oh Lees A 1 PO is Gomes: 1S ESA Ms ea Do DA SOUT os ee ee ek Baume 222 2 oO ae Sen Do 2 ue Garunens. © =u a ee ff (oan epee, Na Na peal Sie Do 26es bala witnesses ots ORE Sree Golrs 2 O2_ MEMO AO Do OA fee gl ak yt aS a a es we dosiea4 bene 24s Do 2S Shen b ee eee oe ee Se J Rabe as ot ee See ee he Do 29 Hullertom Pield= 22222 -2_ |p Ss dosti’ DEMING “fore Do 30) HerOctOnvill es = eee eee GO =e Ff es ee Do. SUR MO LOVET tee oS Clavier Ja—0 foe oes See Griffin, 19438; Mayer-Oakes, 1955. a2. bultalo, (Wells) = eee. alee (6 (0 YSeBe ie Rate Sak oh nah WE hee ol Do. Joe Orchard (barsons)= es. e ssa dose 2 Ne Fea ae Mairs, 1950; Mayer-Oakes, 1955. ae CUEEG = |S £5 tee ek oe eles Ces ace ps Dn Griffin, 1948. Eee SO VANS UO Wyte ee GO ee ee eee Do. *Denotes sites containing historic materials. East of the Fort Ancient Aspect, on the headwaters of the Ohio, Potomac, and western Susquehanna Rivers, lie two closely related basically Woodland Aspects displaying numerous influences of Mis- sissippian character, seemingly derived from the Feurt and Clover Foci of the Fort Ancient culture. Such influences became so strong in the later phases of the Monongahela Focus that the latter has sometimes been considered a part of the Mississippi Pattern. Histori- cally, however, the Monongahela roots seem to be Woodland, the Mississippi traits coming in as foreign elements from the west, and being of particular importance in the westernmost focus—the Monon- sop T ee APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 225 Map 10.—Components of the Fort Ancient Aspect. gahela. The Mississippian influences are attenuated most in the Shenk’s Ferry Aspect, but still give this culture a distinctive cast (Butler, 1939; Evans, 1955; Griffin, 1952; Manson, MacCord, and Griffin, 1944, p. 416; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 98-112, 155-162, 220- 224; Witthoft, 1954; 1955; Witthoft and Farver, 1952). The Monongahela Aspect is distributed over a large territory which includes eastern Ohio, northern West Virginia, and the western parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. The Monongahela Focus is largely west of the Appalachian Divide and the Luray Focus en- tirely east of the Divide (see map 11). Both foci are characterized by distinctive pottery vessels and pipe types, by certain kinds of beads, pendants, and projectile points, and the occurrence of heavily fortified hilltop villages displaying round stockades and houses, and central plazas. From his study of the Monongahela Focus Mayer-Oakes concluded that The abundance and relative richness of Monongahela sites imply that these peoples were probably the most numerous single group of Indians ever to live in the Upper Ohio Valley. The general excellence of pottery and other artifacts, control over environment and creation of leisure time indicate that the Monon- gahela villagers had reached a high level of adjustment to their natural surround- ings. . . . Warfare and military activities were an important aspect of life in Monongahela times. The very structure of the village indicates that ideas of protection were prevalent. Also many village situations, on hilltops and other 296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 commanding positions, obviously served defensive purposes. . . . While these people settled primarily in the area drained by the lower and middle Monongahela River, some settlements are known from the Ohio Valley proper and outlying villages occur in the Shenango and upper Allegheny valleys. Some of the Whittle- sey focus sites are characterized by minor amounts of Monongahela pottery. ‘‘Monongahela Cordmarked [pottery]’’ is also found on sites in the Shenandoah and Potomac valleys, most often as trade material but perhaps as components in several instances. [Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 12, 222.] This statement possibly might apply to the Luray Focus also, which unfortunately is still relatively unknown (Manson, MacCord, and Griffin, 1944, pp. 400-401; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 158-162; Schmitt, 1952, pp. 62-64). As is the case with the Fort Ancient culture, numerous clues indicate Monongahela contacts with neighboring groups. Iroquois trade pot- tery frequently has been found in Monongahela sites; conversely, Monongahela pottery is known from Whittlesey sites, and from historic sites on the lower Susquehanna and Potomac which have been dated at c. 1600. European trade goods also have been found in Monongahela components which, curiously enough, are concen- trated in the middle Monongahela drainage near the headwaters of the Potomac. Historic trade goods are never abundant, however, partly because the Monongahela people do not seem to have prac- ticed the custom of burying grave goods with their dead, and partly because the Monongahela culture and peoples disappeared before European penetration became intensive. The territory of the Monon- gahela Aspect seems to have remained essentially unoccupied until about 1700, at which time Indian groups from the east began a movement into it. A number of students have identified the Iroquois as the cause of the Monongahela disappearance (Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 9-12, 228; Schmitt, 1952, pp. 67-69). Somewhat more data is available concerning the fate of the Shenk’s Ferry Aspect. Characterized by ‘“‘widely scattered tiny hamlets,’ and by distinctive pottery types, the two foci of the Shenk’s Ferry Aspect occupied the eastern side of the Susquehanna drainage be- tween Harrisburg and the Pennsylvania-Maryland State line, the middle course of the Susquehanna between Harrisburg and Wilkes- Barre, and the west branch of the Susquehanna to Renova, and were overrun some time between 1560 and 1590 by the Tioga Focus from the Upper Susquehanna. This process seems to have involved, among other things, an absorption of Shenk’s Ferry peoples into the Tioga culture. The reasons for this conclusion have been pre- sented by Witthoft: We have several reasons for believing that the Shenk’s Ferry people survived into the Historic period. The best evidence comes from the Shultz Site of Wash- ingtonboro, the earliest Susquehannock [Tioga] site on the lower Susquehanna, Antropy;2P: APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 227 . . . On this site the whole Shenk’s Ferry complex, including the pottery types described here, along with a majority of another type of Shenk’s Ferry pottery partially acculturated to Susquehannock style, is intermixed with early colonial Susquehannock materials in a large number of the pits and graves, and apparently represents the product of a large number of captives. At the next Susquehannock Site, the Washingtonboro Site, a very few such Shenk’s Ferry sherds have been excavated from Susquehannock middens of the mid-seven- teenth century [now redated to 1600-1620]. [Witthoft and Farver, 1952, p. 5.] Thus, the Shenk’s Ferry history, like that of the Monongahela and Fort Ancient Aspect, affords ample proof of the nonstatic nature of Indian interrelations in the Early Historic (Witthoft, 1951, p. 318; 1954, pp. 26-27; 1955). The remaining archeological complex represented within the north- western Pennsylvania and Ohio area is the so-called Iroquois Aspect; a distinctive cultural unit seemingly indigenous to the interior low plateau and central lowland provinces flanking the northernmost ranges and plateaus of the Appalachian system, expanding into the Allegheny sector of the Appalachian Plateau and into the ridge and valley provinces of Pennsylvania only during the historic period. The westernmost focus of the Iroquois Aspect was the Whittlesey, the fortified towns of which extended along the Ohio shore of Lake Erie, along the Maumee River into Indiana (e.g. ,the Secrest-Reasoner component of Blackford County, Ind., not shown on the accompany- ing map), and possibly into southeastern Michigan. While its cul- tural affiliations largely point east to the Ripley Focus and to the Iroquois Aspect generally, the focus also shows strong influences from the Monongahela Aspect and from the Mississippian cultures, particularly Fort Ancient. Like these other archeological complexes, the Whittlesey Focus disappeared during the Early Historic—only one component, Fairport, yielding any European trade goods. As a result of this early demise, few suggestions exist as to the identity of the culture’s bearers. Most archeologists have avoided the ques- tion altogether; others, lacking any other candidates, have brought forth the Erie (Black, 1935; Griffin, 1944, p. 368; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, p. 222; Morgan, 1952, pp. 96-97). The Ripley Focus, with components lying along the southern shore of Lake Erie between Buffalo and the Ohio border, is closely related to the Lawson and Factory Hollow Foci farther to the east, and less so to the Whittlesey. The major sites, Ripley and 28th Street, are large, rich villages yielding European trade goods of an early date. Nolater sites have been found, leading to the general conclusion that this culture also disappeared before or about 1650. The Ripley Focus often has been identified as the remains of the Erie tribe (or nation), but its major characteristics, a small number of large villages situated very close to Lake Erie, are such that this identification may 298 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 COMPONENTS OF THE MONONGAHELA AND SHENK’S FERRY ASPECTS, APPALACHIAN PHASE, WOODLAND PATTERN Components Focus Reference ToMobatess seo e ee ek Monongahela. ____ Mayer-Oakes, 1955. Ds OVINE Lyf 2 Re SA Faas fo plas Bake cleat ee Oo. 3: OO Mel 6. Herta Baer Shree s dotesl* Bun7-s Do ASS ORB VEO =e ee ee Sa ie es (och A es ae Do Stishippmenerts) !. 00) 19) 4608 Goat 25h ee Do Gi. (SCARCIN A 5 08 A ee re aay ies em COS ieee oes Do CEVA LS OM Ei = Sere eee Sok ea rset a (6 (oy ek ee Poe S Do S46 ski 2B bs RE Tie FF pg STE Ot Gos Ses Os Do OF PA ORK G ea eo ae BoP Al tee dos seen es Do LOMA GBT 2h Sa re ee NE Goses eh eee Do IEE AGL Olt) Lis LOVE 3S Mahe TE Gos AR) Do Lj A OnOh (eased eet i el ee GO aan eS Do SAG Ohmien see. Sa TL ae ro koe ee Riel aa Do. TAS A GUM 7c Esk Oe. SIPS eat dot Peels evra Do. 15. McKee Rock Mound____|__-_-_- Ose te — Bee Do. Gib unclasee. Soe Comin see Sl hoe Gomes see Do. Dae NG Well sebet eet oP AT enh Gouse uel. 9 Do. TS. Philips. = fon os Poe en ee (oo ene ee oer Do. HORNS peerss eee haw. 1 eee lea (0 (oy Ae OR RE Do. 202.Buekner sea Sty See So ee dose: terse Do. DECKER | a Se, fps Dae eel eee (o (oj eens © ee Do. 22 Wile sesh OE RUA TNC (Ae. go dosse ie ae Do. eeu Our besser WARIS 299) 5_ | eee Gow co. Do. 2A, PASIAN ECTS 5-2 ea.) 4 6) oe Gort nips tpaes: Do. De AORGGM. ~> pultalo Gaps Jeo. 2. So. |oee at co ge oy ae Do. AA @lovercreeic= 4246. Sane CL One hd ee Do. 45. Waynesville sites_.._____|_____ AO sepa tie ee Witthoft, 1955. AGsa Welsh bynes seo ee nee Se (3 (Oye Oe Do. AT PUBVeret bees > ee bs TE BUT e?, Gost antes» SeRbs Do. AS oy UMOTNY ® oe ke ee Shenk’s Ferry __-__- Witthoft and Farver, 1952. AQPAMillert22 - seers iy oe Wie tae Oo eae BN Do. SO#Shen ket 2 2 sk a aa ae doseewite Dee Do. OBR ES TenmMe nan asses ee eee | eee clone eens Sete Do. o2esbetermices pues 22 1 ola ee dolar ate Do. Hae watara (orb) olen ee eee Coe UE as Do. 54. Indiantown Gap*_______]____- (Cho ieee ee OP er Do. 55. Muncy Creek*__________ SUCEN Malis ee eee ee Witthoft, 1954. HEM Mbe WATT. sa SbUr ¥ EST ee Gore se. DOI Do. *Denotes sites containing historic material. AnropT 2P- APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 229 Mar 11.—Components of the Monongahela (black) and Shenk’s Ferry (white) Aspects, Appalachian Phase, Woodland Pattern. not survive critical reading of the historical sources. Witthoft (1951, p. 320) has expressed some doubts on this point (Carpenter, Pfirman, and Schoff, 1949, p. 6; MacNeish, 1952 a, p. 6; 1952 b, pp. 22-24: Parker, 1907; 1922, pp. 271-276). North and east of the Ripley Focus we find the Lawson and Fac- tory Hollow Foci. The former includes several sites in the Buffalo area east of Niagara, and others in southern Ontario. Only the Buffum Street site has yielded historic trade goods, yet the entire focus is attributed, with some justification, to the Neutrals, who are known from historical sources to have resided in this same area, to have suffered several defeats at the hands of the New York Iro- quois between 1648 and 1651, and to have abandoned their country shortly thereafter (Kidd, 1952, pp. 74-75; MacNeish, 1952 a, p. 54; 1952 b, pp. 10-11; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 319-320). The Factory Hollow Focus represents the remains of the early historic Seneca. Not only are most of the sites historic but several have been identified with reasonable certainty with historically known villages. These include Rochester Junction (Totiakton, also known as Sonnontuan), Kirkwood (Gannounata), Boughton Hill (Ganagaro), and Beal (Gandougarae), all of which were destroyed by Denonville in 1687. The ‘direct historical method” is applicable 230 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 here. Research in this direction by Wray and Schoff (1953) has defined those archeological traits (imported and native) distinctive of Seneca culture at various times during the Early Historic, has eluci- dated the changes brought about in Seneca culture by European influences, and has indicated the sequence in which the various villages were occupied between 1550 and 1687. The archeological materials also emphasize the restricted distribution of these early historic villages which lie largely within a narrow ecological zone formed by the merger of the interior low plateau with the lowland bordering Lake Ontario, bounded on the east by Lake Canandaigua and on the west by the Genesee. The archeological evidence on hand at present does not indicate any extensive Seneca movement away from this area, other ‘Seneca’ sites being known only from the Genesee and the Upper Allegheny (mostly undescribed and unpub- lished), and possibly on the Susquehanna. All these are historic, however, and some are historically documented Late Colonial (Hough- ton, 1912, pp. 363-410; MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 53-54; 1952 b, pp. 38-39; Mayer, 1943; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, p. 72; Parker, 1919; Ritchie, 1954; Steward, 1954; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 318-319; 1955; Wray, 1954; 1955; Wray and Schoff, 1953). The remaining foci of the Iroquois Aspect to be found in New York are not directly pertinent to the purposes of this study, and only a few comments need to be made. The Madison Focus furnishes us with a warning against the uncritical correlation of archeological foci with tribes, components showing striking similarities having been correlated with historical villages assigned to the Onondaga, Oneida, and St. Lawrence Iroquois (Kwedech) tribes. This fact is also of interest in light of the known linguistic affiliations and warns us against making any rash assumptions concerning the carriers of archeological cultures (MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 52-53; 1952 b, pp. 56-57, 66, 84; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 316-317). As has been intimated already, the Tioga Focus originally seems to have occupied the Upper Susquehanna drainage and to have migrated from there to the Lower Susquehanna, blotting out the Shenk’s Ferry culture in the process. This conclusion is based upon studies of the datable European trade goods found in the sites and upon cross-correlation with well-known Seneca sites, and may be considered as fairly well established. The Upper Susquehanna sites, such as Homets Ferry, South Towanda (Sick), and Cass, are equivalent to the earliest historical Seneca sites, and are datable at c. 1550. The Quiggle site on the west branch of the Susquehanna is slightly later, and apparently represents the initial Tioga thrust into the lower valley. After this time both the north and west branches seem to have been abandoned, the archeological materials indicating a gap until Anh} > APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 23] the arrival of Delaware immigrants around 1720. The large Schultz and Brandt sites, already mentioned in connection with the Shenk’s Ferry remnants or “captives,” represent the final Tioga migration downstream and are dated from 1560 to 1590. These are followed by the Herriot site at Romney, W. Va., and by the large Washington- boro site which dated from 1600 to 1620 and therefore was in existence at the time of John Smith’s visit to the area in 1608. Later Tioga sites have not been reported yet (Witthoft, 1955). The contemporaneity of the Tioga Washingtonboro site and John Smith’s visit permits a reasonable (although circumstantial) identi- fication of the bearers of this culture. In his accounts and map Smith places a tribe named the ‘Sasquesahanocks” (a ‘‘mightie people”) upon the Susquehanna River below the mountains and in- dicates several of their towns, one of which might be the Washing- tonboro site. From other sources these “‘SSasquesahanocks” can be correlated with all or part of the Iroquois-speaking group known to the New York Iroquois, Huron, and French, as the Andasternonnon or Andaste (whence the usual name for the archeological unit). During the 17th century these people engaged in a long bitter war with the New York Iroquois, and eventually were conquered around 1674. It is interesting to note that while the Andaste language is related closely to Mohawk, the material culture as revealed by archeology is similar to that of the Factory Hollow, Lawson, and Ripley Foci (Cadzow, 1936, pp. 9-38; Hanna, 1911, vol. 1, pp. 26-87; Skinner, 1921, pp. 57-67; Witthoft, 1955). The historical evidence relative to the location of the Erie-Black Minqua-Massawomeck is scanty and circumstantial, but still suffi- cient for us to correlate this tribal confederation with an archeological complex. From the material on hand it is evident that the Black Minqua were west of the Susquehanna drainage area which, in 1670, “was occupied by the Susquehannock (see maps 6 and 8). The state- ments made by John Smith and others make it clear that the Monacan and Manahoac occupied the Virginia Piedmont, and that the Massa- womeck were to the west in the mountains. The French sources also are consistent in placing the Erie in the upper Ohio River area. Three statements are particularly important in this respect. The first, dating from 1661 or 1662, derives from Lallemant. Proceeding rather Westerly than Southerly, another band of Iroquois is going four hundred leagues from here [the Iroquois country] in pursuit of a Nation whose only offense consists in its not being Iroquois. It is called Ont°agannha, signifying ‘‘the place where people cannot speak’’—because of the corrupt Al- gonquin in use there. Their villages are situated along a beautiful river which serves to carry the people down the great Lake (for so they call the Sea)... . [Thwaites, ed., 1896- 1901, vol. 47, pp. 145-147.] 682—611—64——_19 232 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 COMPONENTS OF THE IROQUOIS ASPECT, NORTHEASTERN PHASE, WOOD- LAND PATTERN Components Focus Reference 1. National Tube Co______- Whittlesey________ Greenman, 1935 b; 1937. PASM BAU Sees ple Ne Oe oe Ba Glee (6 Vo eS i Greenman, 1935 b. oe eutblerbuall. flees 2 eee ae as Gols ie Fe Greenman, 1937. Ae OUCH Park Sea Ee GOs IEe 4s ee Do. BPI POLGT seer 8 Smeets aS ee (i Pe Rai ae a he ha Morgan and Ellis, 1943. GseReever: euler dole Ghges Greenman, 1935 a. WapBOLCe Orb eet hae lees Xe ae Greenman, 1935 b. Se POUlOreGG hs. sae fe 787s pley so eee oe Carpenter, Pfirman, and Schoff, 1949. OS OELOY fg At he toh ele 5) ee ee Ser Parker, 1907. Os Gooayeare we ..s joe eke Soe One eons MacNeish, 1952 a, b. Le). Southwold: ti/Vit Su}. Ihanvsonis 2. 600 ar Do. a2 7 lopawsan set Fe tt he tet be Oe ae ee Wintemberg, 1939. SAME OUT GSH ees. s eee kOe ery ee Co (ape OM Dat aay MacNeish, 1952 b. US Uren 22208 Le Ee Peet dob hrR iOS = Wintemberg, 1928. $5. Middleport- << 225242 2cfowve Mine a fe 04, 4 Wintemberg, 1948. ROM ARCIOIUca eee eee ee Se (6 (Aen od aaa MacNeish, 1952 a, b; Witt- hoft, 1951. 7; sini treet fH. te Be Qos. 8-2 22 ae MacNeish, 1952 b. 18. Boseley Mills*__________ Factory Hollow___| Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. AS og eo en Se ee Dee DO FE gs re ses Wray and Schoff, 1953. 207 souteh Hollows: = 2. 2. |222.2 CO see ae Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. OW TW OO GF sh Fo Bd ce ie ers a8 (hc hae Lae eee Do. Ben PAGANS Ae Sh 6 Soe eet Goeceee ste Do. 25 AiCameron s+ Oi ese es|L owe Gots Fe Wray and Schoff, 1953. POI Na eee ee a ne ae 2 (ee ao. Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. oA 98 a ie on ware i a Goss UG Ee Do. 20.p Powel HouUse* } ._ 2 t42..-|f 224 AG a a Fe, Do Pf Adel BS 0 See oT Se ER aR Re as) Gotan a Do 28. Rochester Junction*_____|_____ dole) SUITE YS: Do 20/5 PVISIER OM Soe oe poe yh Se ee Alice Osa Pe dt 4s a8 Do. SU: Hactory Hollow *t- 282 |=. = 5 GOS aaa eames ee 1912; Parker, 1919. SV AVAUR DAG lo. pote a. ooo jp lade (0 (0 oe Sane Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. S2vConmes, A hs FiO eb CoE eaes ee dosl Shean Wray and Schoff, 1953. 33. Boughton Hill Fort*_.___)_._-- (6 Ko eee 5 Ore yee Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. of Boughton EMF 2) it 9 ui Gh Es Le BE Do. SO DUN COR ape ees oe el 1 ee 2a ae Do. OP SEO ae hey) een ee ey CKO baat em at Do. OTT MeLOneN Fok Ley OLE OTSA NE Gora Shy. MASE Houghton, 1912. BISA Pe liters) (2: ee ena me (EPs (Clee Aen eee Do. DUS svbarsne seas Sts See ere ee dpstmee coats Houghton, 1912; Wray and Schoff, 1953. AG ROK Oe 2 on es es Py Se Te ee -: (oes ea Do. oe Onaghee a. 2S Se eee 38 CLOW ernea Suen Parker, 1922. foe Weeleher> Siete ig. ea Genoa Fort ___-__ MacNeish, 1952 b. 43! (Richmond ‘Malls. 22 8 Senn Galil deere dt Do. AA Woodley 2.500 eo We Op} SoOe Jay ees Do. 45>) Miver s.Statiom.. —2- Soest i (0 een pat Sais Ds Do. AG Senos IPOrG oe 2 8 le i) ee Do. 47. Pompey Center*________ Madisone: 5-9 oLe Wintemberg, 1936; Mac- Neish, 1952 a, b. See footnote at end of table. Ano yo; » APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 233 COMPONENTS OF THE IROQUOIS ASPECT, NORTHEASTERN PHASE, WOOD- LAND PATTERN—Continued Components Focus Reference AS? ‘Thurston tas. ae Madison:) 225... = MacNeish, 1952 b. AQ’ Diable* yt thas 0 ele eS (coy ae ee Do. OL Iikrwaras\ ile ee Gore: sesh es Do. Bile MENG Geshe Le he Ree BI OPA eS ene ee ee! Lucy, 1950. 029 Murray). 24 2 |B Coe =e ARs = Murray, 1921. 53) Chemung Bridge*_.__2_ _|2_=.- don tts £854 Do. 549 Queen’ Eisther’s’_2"-2 25-3) 2 2228 GO eee Do. poe Oldusheshequina sass 5a = GOm See ae ae Do. 569 Nouth Lowanda t= 22. sas ovens Sahees Witthoft, 1955. SiR ase ee awe ale: 5 eee doers. wae Do. 58s Homet’s Perry *. <2 2 22.Y Pes Goel teres bel ne Do. HOM @inicgles Le. 402 5s 58 eas Gow. fe sth 3 Lucy, 1950; Witthoft, 1954. GOS. Brandt: /4e2 Steet oso! ieee ee CGEE tsa. tee Witthoft, 1955. 61. Washingtonboro*________|-_--- Gos fe he tae Caer 1936; Witthoft, 1 : G2P Sehuigah a. 2220 8 Sess dot... See Do. Gaaieneklert. _¢. 2 .g20 2 Ueber ree nies beh wey Do. 643 Shenk’s Ferry 222.2) 222 0 C0, Sa pe anne oa Do. Gos -Herrnioth=- se oo ee lee nee oko’ ce rs Manson and MacCord, 1940; 1943; Witthoft, 1952; 1955. *Denotes sites containing historic materials. Map 12.—Components of the Iroquois Aspect, Northeastern Phase, Woodland Pattern. 234 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 “! DEWAWARE °° Si he cw . aa . plain ANTICOKE a ee pe Shakori Occaneechi — Sissipaha Cheéeraw mygered Keyouwee Map 13.—Probable distribution of Iroquoian tribes. Black circles indicate known locations of Black Minqua or Erie groups. The second statement, from Gallinee, tells us that in 1668 two canoes of Senecas came to Montreal to trade, and told La Salle . .. Of such marvels of the River Ohio, which they said they knew perfectly. . . . They told him that this river had its source three days’ journey from Sonnontouan, and that after a month’s travel he would reach the Honnia- sontkeronons and the Chiouanons, and that after having passed these and a great waterfall, which there was in the river, he would find the Outagame and the country of the Iskousogos, and finally a country so abounding in deer and wild cattle that they were thick as the woods, and such great numbers of people that there could be no more. [Margry, 1876-86, p. 116.] In the following year, 1669, when the Abbe Gallinee attempted to obtain a prisoner from the Ohio from the Seneca to act as a guide for A OPT WP APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 235 La Salle on his intended journey to that river, he was informed that the Toaguenha [Ontoagnnhe] who lived there were an evil people who would attack them in the night, and that, furthermore, he would also run the risk of being attacked by the Antastoez [Andaste] (Maregry, 1876-86, pp. 137-138). Since the Iroquois already had defeated the Erie in 1655 and 1656, it is unlikely that these statements refer to them. This seems to be confirmed by the names given which refer to Algonquian groups, the name Ontoagonnha apparently being a general term referring to both the Honniasontkeronon and Chiouanon. The statement of 1668 makes it clear, however, that the Honniasontkeronon and Chiouanon lived on the Ohio above the falls at Louisville. The old Erie territory therefore must have been farther east. Relating this to the archeological picture, it would seem that the Honniasontk- eronon and Chiouanon (Shawnee) occupied the territory of the Fort Ancient Aspect, while the Erie-Black Minqua-Massawomeck in- habited the area of the Monongahela Aspect. This interpretation of the early tribal distribution of the middle Appalachian region is depicted in map 13. BIBLIOGRAPHY ApoupH, Henry F. 1938. ‘Archaeological fragments’? of the middle Susquehanna. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 37-39. AtyorpD, CLARENCE W., and Bripegoop, LEE. 1912. The first explorations of the trans-Allegheny region by the Virginians, 1650-1674. Cleveland. ANONYMOUS. 1934. Old Iroquois fort found on dam site. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 4, No. 3, p. 22. Anonymovus-Zunica Map. 1608. Map of Virginia, transmitted by Don Pedro de Zufiiga, Spanish Minister at London to Philip III of Spain on Sept. 10, 1608. Ms., Simanca, Archivo General de Simancas, Estado, Legajo 2586, folio 148. [See Brown, 1890, vol. 1, pp. 183-188; Cumming, 1958, No. 28; Lewis and Loomie, 1953, pp. 262-263 (Lewis and Loomie attribute the map to Nathaniel Powell).] ARBER, Epwarp, Epiror, see Smiru, JOHN, 1884. AveGustTINE, Epear E. 1938 a. Recent discoveries in Somerset County. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 6-12. 1938 b. Indian fortifications in Somerset County. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 41-45. 1938 c. Somerset County excavations: The Powell sites. The Pennsyl- vania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 60-63, 71. 1938 d. Important research on Peck and Martz Rock Shelter site in Somer- set County. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 83-88. 1942. Report of preliminary excavations at Logstown. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 23-26. 236 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Baitey, Joun H. 1938. An analysis of Iroquoian ceramic types. Amer. Antiq., vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 333-338. BeaucHamp, Wiiuiam M. 1898. Earthenware of the New York aborigines. New York State Mus. Bull. No. 22, Archeol. No. 3, pp. 71-146. Brinrorp, Lewis R. 1959. Comments on the ‘‘Siouan Problem.’’ Ethnohistory, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 28-41. BLAcK, GLENN A. 1935. Excavation of a Blackford County site. Indiana Hist. Bull., vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 148-157. [Secrest-Reasoner site.] 1954. An archaeological consideration of the Walam Olum. Jn Walam Olum, or Red Score. The migration legend of the Lenni Lenape or Delaware Indians ..., pp. 292-348. Indiana Hist. Soc., Indianapolis. Brown, ALEXANDER. 1890. The genesis of the United States. A narrative of the movement in England, 1605-1616, which resulted in the plantation of North America by Englishmen... .2 vols. Boston. Browne, Witiiam H., Epiror. 1883. Archives of Maryland. Volume 1; Proceedings and Acts of Mary- land, January 1637/8-September 1664... . Maryland Hist. Soc., Baltimore. Burk, Joun D. 1804-05. The history of Virginia from its first settlement to the present day .... 3 vols. Petersburg, Virginia. [The same, con- tinued by S. Jones and L. Hugh Girardin; vol. 4, published in 1816 in Petersburg.] ButLer, Mary. 1939. Three archaeological sites in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Hist. Comm. Bull. No. 753. Harrisburg. Byrp, WILLIAM. 1728. The secret history of the Line. MS., Amer. Philos. Soc. The history of the dividing line betwixt Virginia and North Carolina run in the year of our Lord 1728. MS., New York, c. 1738. [Published in 1841, 1866, 1901, and 1929.] 1929. William Byrd’s histories of the dividing line betwixt Virginia and North Carolina, with introduction and notes by William K. Boyd. North Carolina Hist. Comm., Raleigh. Capzow, Donatp A. 1936. Archaeological studies of the Susquehannock Indians of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Hist. Comm. Publ., vol. 3, Safe Harbor Rep. No. 2. CARPENTER, Epmunp 8. 1942. Archaeological reconnaissance in the Upper Allegheny Valley. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 20-63. [Historic sites— Cornplanter Seneca of 1845-1885; Buckaloons; Sugar Run; Kinzua; Warren; W. Hickory; Oldtown; Indian Gap. Prehistoric.] CARPENTER, EpMUND S., PrirMAN, K. R., and Scuorr, H. L. 1949. The 28th Street site. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 19, Nos. 1-2, pp. 3-16. [Erie site of 1630-45 in Erie, Pa.] Anthrop. Pap. No wo] » APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 237 Cross, DororHy. 1941. Archaeology of New Jersey .... Prepared with the assistance of Work Projects Administration, official project Nos. 165-22-8084, 62-22-6406, and 665-22-3369. Archaeol. Soc. New Jersey and New Jersey State Mus. Trenton. Davipson, DANIEL 8. 1929. Lock Haven expedition . . . along the west branch of the Susque- hanna. Univ. Pennsylvania, Univ. Mus., Mus. Jour., vol. 20, Nos. 3-4, pp. 307-318. [The Quiggle site, Pine Station, Clinton Co. Pa., is Andaste of late Prehistoric.] Encperc, Rospert M. 1931. Algonkian sites of Westmoreland and Fayette Counties, Pennsyl- vania. West. Pennsylvania Hist. Mag., vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 143- 184. Pittsburgh. [Monongahela Aspect.] EVANS, CLIFFORD. 1955. A ceramic study of Virginia archeology. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 160. Evans, LEwis. 1755. A general map of the Middle British Colonies in America... . Sold by R. Dodsey, Pall-Mall, London, and by the author in Philadel- phia. 1939. Lewis Evans [and his works], by Lawrence Henry Gipson. Hist. Soc. Pennsylvania. Philadelphia. FENSTERMAKER, GERALD B. 1937. Iroquois animal gods or hunting charms. The Pennsylvania Archae- ol., vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 76-78. Frra@uson, Auice L. 1937 a. Burial area in Moyaone. Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 261-267. 1937 b. Moyaone and the Piscataway Indians. Washington, D.C. FrrRNow, BertTHoLpd, and O’Catuacuan, E. B., Epirors. 1853-87. Documents relative to the colonial history of the State of New York. 15 vols. Albany. Fowxker, GERARD. 1894. Archeologic investigations in James and Potomac Valleys. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 23. 1902. Archaeological history of Ohio. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Soc., Columbus. FRACHTENBURG, LEo J. 1913. Contributions to a Tutelo vocabulary. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 477-479. GatTrorD, LIONEL. 1657. Publick good without private interest. Or, A compendious remon- strance of the present sad state and condition of the English colonie in Virginea. H. Marsh, London. [Printed again in 1866, in Vienna, by F. Koke for La Librairie Tross 4 Paris.] GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, UpPerR House. 1883. Action on ‘‘Act for Assistance to the Susquehannock’’; passed May 2, 1661. In Browne, 1883, pp. 400-407. Gipson, LAwRENCE H. See Evans, Lewis, 1939. 938 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 GRASSMAN, THOMAS. 1952. The question of the locations of Mohawk Indian village sites existing during the Historic Period. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 22, Nos. 3-4, pp. 98-111. GREENMAN, Emerson F. 1935 a. Excavation of the Reeve Village site, Lake County, Ohio. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 2-64. 1935 b. Seven prehistoric sites in northern Ohio. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 220-237. 1937. Two prehistoric villages near Cleveland, Ohio. Ohio State Ar- chaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 305-366. 1939. Cultural relationships of archaeological sites in the Upper Great Lakes Region. Papers, Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Lett., vol. 24, Part 4, pp. 1-10. 1951. Old Birth Island Cemetery and the early historic trade route. Univ. Michigan Mus. Anthrop. Occ. Contr. No. 11. GRIFFIN, JAMES B. 1943. The Fort Ancient Aspect. Its cultural and chronological position in Mississippi Valley archaeology. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann. Arbor. 1944. The Iroquois in American prehistory. Papers, Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Lett., vol. 29, pp. 357-374. 1945. An interpretation of Siouan archaeology in the piedmont of North Carolina and Virginia. Amer. Antiq., vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 321- 330. 1952. The Late Prehistoric cultures of the Ohio Valley. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 186-195. [Whittle- sey Focus, Fort Ancient, Monongahela.] Hae, Horatio. 1883. The Tutelo tribe and language. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 21, No. 114, pp. 1-45. Hanna, CHaruzs A. 1911. The wilderness trail; Or, The ventures and adventures of the Penn- sylvania traders on the Allegheny Path.... New York. HARPER, J. RUSSELL. 1952. The Webb site, a stage in early Iroquoian development. Penn- sylvania Archaeol., vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 49-64. HAZARD, SAMUEL, ET AL. 1852-1935. Pennsylvania archives. Series 1, Philadelphia; series 2-8, Harrisburg. Henine, Witt1am W., Epiror. 1809-23. Statutes at large; being a collection of all the laws of Virginia, from the first session of the legislature, in the year 1619 .... 13 vols. Richmond. [2d edition, 1823, New York, Philadelphia, and Richmond; vols. 1—5 only.] HENRETTA, JAMES FE. 1929. Kane and the Upper Allegheny. Philadelphia. HERRMAN, AUGUSTIN. 1673. Virginia and Maryland as it is planted and inhabited this present year 1670 surveyed and exactly drawn by the only labour & endeavour of Augustin Herrman Bohemiensis. John Seller, Hydrographer to the King at his shop in exchangeally in Cornhill. London. Po] 2D APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 239 Heyes, Grores, and Prrpmr, Grorce H. 1915. Exploration of a Munsee cemetery near Montague, New Jersey. Contr. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Found., vol. 4, No. 3. [Bell- Philhower site.] Hopes, FREDERICK W., Epiror. 1907, 1910. Handbook of American Indians north of Mexico. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 30, pts. 1 and 2. Hotm, THomas CAMPANIUS. 1834. A short description of the Province of New Sweden.... Trans- lated from the Swedish . . . with notes by Peter S. Du Ponceau. Pennsylvania Hist. Soc. Mem., vol. 3, pp. 1-166. HovucGuton, FREDERICK. 1912. The Seneca Nation from 1655 to 1687. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 363-464. JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 1800. Jefferson’s notes on the State of Virginia. . . . W. Pechin, Baltimore. 1954. Notes on the State of Virginia; edited with an introduction and notes by William Peden. Inst. Early Amer. Hist. and Cult., Williams- burg, Virginia. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. See also PADOVER, SAUL K. Jesuit Revations. See THwaiTES, REUBEN GOLD. JOHNSON, AMANDUS. 1930. The instructions for Johan Printz, Governor of New Sweden, “the first constitution or supreme law of the States of Pennsylvania and Delaware.’’ The Swedish Colonial Soc., Philadelphia. See also LINDESTROM, PETER. KAHLER, CLARKE B. 1938. Indian exploration work near Munsee, Pa., 1936 and 1937. Now and Then, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 69-72. [Munsee Creek site at mouth of Muncy Creek, of Shenk’s Ferry Aspect, c. 1620.] Kipp, KENNETH E. 1952. Sixty years of Ontario archeology. In ‘Archeology of Eastern United States,” ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 71-82. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. LEDERER, JOHN. 1672 a. The discoveries of John Lederer, in three several marches from Virginia, to the west of Carolina, and other parts of the continent: Begun in March 1669, and ended in September 1670. Together with a general map of the whole territory which he traversed. Collected and translated out of Latine from his discourse and writings, by Sir William Talbot Baronet. London. [Reprinted by 8. C. Walker, Evans and Cogswell Co., Charleston, S.C., 1891; G. P. Humphrey, Rochester, N.Y., 1902; and in Alvord and Bidgood, 1912, pp. 181-171.] 1672 b. A map of the whole territory traversed by John Lederer in his three marches. London. Jn Lederer, 1672 a, opp. p. 1; Cumming, 1958, No. 68. 1958. The discoveries of John Lederer with unpublished letters by and about Lederer to Governor John Winthrop, Jr. Ed. by William P. Cumming. Univ. Virginia Press, Charlottesville. LEsLIE, VERNON, 1951. A tentative catalogue of Minsi material culture. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 21, Nos. 1-2, pp. 9-20. YAO BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Lewis, Cuirrorp M., and Loomis, ALBERT J. 1953. The Spanish Jesuit Mission in Virginia, 1570-1572. Virginia Hist. Soe. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. LINDEsTROM, PETER. 1925. Geographia Americae with an account of the Delaware Indians, based on surveys and notes made in 1654-1656 by Peter Lindestrém. Translated from the original manuscript with notes, introduction, and an appendix of Indian geographical names with their meanings, by Amandus Johnson. Swedish Colonial Soc., Philadelphia. Lucy, CHar.es L. 1950. Notes on a small Andaste burial site and Andaste archaeology. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 20, Nos. 3-4, pp. 55-62. MacCorp, Howarp A. 1952. The Susquehannock Indians in West Virginia, 1630-1677. West Virginia Hist., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 239-246. MacNEIsuH, Ricuarp 8. 1952 a. The archeology of the Northeastern United States. In “Archeology of Eastern United States,’’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 46-58. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. 1952 b. Iroquois pottery types: A technique for the study of Iroquois prehistory. Nat. Mus. Canada Bull. No. 124, Anthrop. ser. No. 31, pp. 1-166. Marrs, O. L. 1950. A child burial site at site 46Ms61. West Virginia Archeol., No. 3, pp. 1-4. Manson, Cart, and MacCorp, Howarp A. 1940. An historic Iroquois site near Romney, West Virginia. West Vir- ginia Hist., vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 290-293. 1943. Additional notes on the Herriot Farm site. West Virginia Hist., vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 201-211. Manson, Cart; MacCorp, Howarp A.; and GrirrIn, JAMEs B. 1944. The culture of the Keyser Farm site. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Lett., vol. 29, pp. 375-418. Marery, PIERRE. 1876-86. Découvertes et éstablissements des Francais dans l’ouest et dans le sud l’Amerique Septentrionale (1614-1754): Memoires et documents originaux recueillis et publiés par Pierre Margry. 6 vols. Paris. Mayer, JosepH R. 1943. Flintlocks of the Iroquois, 1620-1687. Rochester Mus. Arts and Sci., Res. Rec., vol. 6. MayErR-OakKEs, WILLIAM J. 1953. An archeological survey of the proposed Shanango River Reservoir area in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Annals Carnegie Mus., vol. 33, art. 3 (Anthrop. Ser. No. 1). 1954. The Scarem Site, Washington County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 45-62. 1955. Prehistory of the Upper Ohio Valley; an introductory archeological study. Annals Carnegie Mus., vol. 34 (Anthrop. Ser. No. 2). Miter, Car F. 1957. Revaluation of the eastern Siouan problem, with particular emphasis on the Virginia branches—the Occaneechi, the Saponi, and the Tutelo. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 164, Anthrop. Pap. No. 52. ee APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 24] Mitts, Witi1aM C. 1914. Archeological atlas of Ohio, showing the distribution of the various classes of prehistoric remains in the State, with a map of the principal Indian trails and towns. Ohio State Archeol. and Hist. Soc., Columbus. Mooney, JAMES. 1894. The Siouan tribes of the east. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 22. MoorEHEAD, WARREN K. 1938. A report of the Susquehanna River Expedition. Andover Press, Andover, Mass. Morgan, RicHarpD G. 1952. Outline of cultures in the Ohio region. In ‘Archeology of Eastern United States,”’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 83-98. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. Morean, RicHarp G., and Ennis, H. H. 1943. The Fairport Harbor Village site. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 3-64. Morrison, A. J. 1921. The Virginia Indian trade to 1673. William and Mary Coll. Quart. Hist. Mag., 2d ser., vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 217-236. Murray, Louise W. 1921. Aboriginal sites in and near “Teaoga,”’ now Athens, Pennsylvania. I. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-214. Nertt, Epwarp D. 1876. The founders of Maryland, as portrayed in manuscripts, provincial records and early documents. Albany. 1886. Virginia Carolorum: the colony under the rule of Charles the First and Second, 1625-1685, based upon manuscripts and documents of the period. Albany Norona, DELF. 1950. An Indian old field in Washington’s round bottom lands. West Virginia Archeol., No. 3, pp. 9-10. PapovER, Saut K. 1943. The complete Jefferson. Containing his major writings, published or unpublished, except his letters. New York. PARKER, ARTHUR C. 1907. Excavations in an Erie Indian village and burial site at Ripley, Chautauqua County, N.Y. New York State Mus. Bull. No. 117 (Archeol. No. 14). 1919. A contact Seneca site situated at Factory Hollow, Ontario County, N.Y. with a map by Alter H. Cassebeer and report of a field survey by H. C. Follett. New York State Archeol. Assoc., Lewis H. Morgan Chap., Res. and Trans., vol. 1, No. 2. Rochester. 1922. The archeological history of New York. New York State Mus. Bull., Nos. 235-238. PHILHOWER, CHARLES A. 1953. The historic Minisink site. I. Archaeol. Soc. New Jersey, Bull. No. 7, pp. 1-9 242 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 PRINTZ, JOHAN. Relation Till datt Hoghloflige West Indesche Compagn. uthi gambla Sverige, den 11 Junij, Anno 1644 uther Nya Swerige afgangitt. MS., Royal Archives, Stockholm, 1644. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp. 105-126, translated and collated.] ——— ‘Translatirte copey der Relation ahn die Hochlobliche West Indesche Compagnie in alt Schweden, den 11 ten Junij Anno 1644 auss New Schweden abganged. MS., Royal Archives, Stoekholm, 1644. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp. 105-126, translated and collated.] Relation till datt Hoghlafflige West Indiske Compagn. Uthj gamble Swerige, Den 20 Februarij 1647 Urthur Nya Swerige afganged. MS., Royal Archives, Stockholm, 1647. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp. 127-148, translated.] Printz to Oxenstierna, April 26, 1653. MS., Royal Archives, Oxenstierna samlingen, Stockholm, 1653. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp. 187-190, translated.] 1883. The report of Governor Johan Printz, of New Sweden, for 1647, and the reply of Count Axel Ocenstjerna, Chancellor of Sweden. Translated from the Swedish by Prof. Gregory B. Keen. The Pennsylvania Mag. Hist. and Biog., vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 271-285. Philadelphia QuimBy, GEorGE I. 1952. The archeology of the Upper Great Lakes area. Jn “Archeology of Eastern United States,” ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 90-107. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. RitcuHi£, WILLIAM A. 1944. The Pre-Iroquoian occupations of New York State. Rochester Mus. Arts and Sci., Mem. No. 1. 1949. The Bell-Philhower site, Sussex County, New Jersey. Indiana Hist. Soc., Prehist. Res. Ser., vol. 3, No. 2. 1951. A current synthesis of New York prehistory. Amer. Antiq., vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 130-136 1954 a. Dutch Hollow, an early historic period Seneca site in Livingston County, New York. Rochester Mus. Arts and Sci., Res. Ree. No. 10. 1954 b. Dutch Hollow, an early historic period Seneca site in Livingston County, New York. New York State Archeol. Assoc., Res. and Trans., vol. 12, No. 1. Scumitt, Kart. 1952. Archeological chronology of the Middle Atlantic States. Jn ‘Arche- ology of Eastern United States,”’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 59-70. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. Scuorr, Harry L. 1937 a. A report of the excavation of the ancient Indian burial mound near Muncy, Lycoming County, Penna. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3-5. 1937 b. Excavation of the village area near the burial mound on the H. G. Brock property, Muncy, Pa. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 6-7. 1937 c. Report on archaeological investigations carried on at the J. T. Roberts property, Montoursville, Lycoming County, Pennsyl- vania. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 7, No. 1, p. 8. Anthrop) 2: APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 243 Simmonps, WILLIAM, and Ports, RicHarp, Eprrors. 1612. The Proceedings of the English Colonie in Virginia since their first beginning from England in the yeare of our Lord 1606, till this present 1612, with all their accidents that befell them on their Iournies and Discoveries. Also the Salvages discourses, orations and relations of the Bordering neighbours, and how they became subject to the English. Oxford. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884, pp. 85-174.] SKINNER, ALANSON B. 1921. Notes on Iroquois archeology. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Found., Notes and Mono., Misc. No. 18. SmitH, JOHN. 1608. A true relation of such occurrences and accidents of noate as hath hapned in Virginia since the first planting of that collony. London. 1612 a. A map of Virginia. Discouered and discribed by Captayn John Smith, 1606. Oxford. Jn Smith, 1884, facing p. 384. 1612 b. A map of Virginia. With a description of the countrey, the com- modities, people, government and religion. Oxford. 1624. The Generall historie of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles: .. .. London. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884, pp. 273-784.] 1884. Capt. John Smith of Willougy by Alford, Lincolnshire; President of Virginia and Admiral of New England. Works. 1608-1631. Ed. by Edward Arber. The English Scholar’s Library, No. 16. Birmingham. 1910. Travels and works of Captain John Smith. Ed. by Edward Arber. A new edition, with a biographical and critical introduction by A. G. Brodley. 2 vols. Edinburgh. SPELMAN, HEnrRy. 1872. Relation of Virginea, by Henry Spelman, 1609. Ed. by Henry Stevens. London. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884, pp. ci-exiv.] Spotswoop, ALEXANDER. 1882-85. The official letters of Alexander Spotswood Lieutenant Governor of the Colony of Virginia, 1710-1722. Virginia Hist. Soc. Coll., n.s., vols. 1-2. Richmond. STEARNS, Ricuarp E. 1940. The Hughes site: An aboriginal village site on the Potomac River in Montgomery County, Maryland. Nat. Hist. Soc. Maryland, Proc. No. 6. Baltimore. Stewart, ALEXANDER M. 1954. Historical evidences of Totiakton: The great western Seneca village. Eastern States Archeol. Federation Bull., No. 13, pp. 6-7. Tren- ton. Stewart, T. Date. 1939. Excavating the Indian village of Patawomeke (Potomac). Explora- tions and Field-Work of the Smithsonian Institution in 1938, pp. 87-90. 1940. Further excavations at the Indian village site of Patawomeke (Po- tomac). Explorations and Field-Work of the Smithsonian Insti- tution in 1939, pp. 79-82. 244 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 STRACHEY, WILLIAM. 1849. The historie of travaile into Virginia Britannia; Expressing the Cosmographie and Comodities of the Country, Together with the Manners and Customes of the People. Gathered and Observed as Well by Those Who Went First Thither as Collected by William Strachey. MS., edited by R. H. Major, in the British Museum. Hakluyt Soe. Publ. No. 6. London. 1953. The historie of travell into Virginia Britania (1612). Ed. by Louis B. Wright and Virginia Freund, from the Princeton manuscript. Hakluyt Soc. Publ. No. 103. London. SruRTEVANT, WILL1AM C. 1958. Siouan languages in the east. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 738-743. SwauGeEr, James L. 1950. Carnegie Museum and the archeology of the Upper Ohio River Basin. West Virginia Archeol., No. 3, pp. 14-15. TuwaltEs, REUBEN G., EpITor. 1896— The Jesuit Relations and allied documents. Travels and explora- 1901. tions of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610-1791. The original French, Latin, and Italian texts, with English translation and notes; illustrated by portraits, maps, facsimiles. 73 vols. Cleveland. VAN DER Donck, ADRIAEN. 1655. Beschryvinge van Nieuw Nederlandt. (Gelijck het tegenwoordigh in Staet is) Begrijpende de Nature, Aert, gelegentheyten vruch- baerheyt van het selve Landt. Evert Nieuwenhof Boeck—ver- kooper. t’Aemsteldom. 1841. Description of the New Netherlands .... Translated from the original Dutch by Hon. Jeremiah Johnson. New York Hist. Soc. Coll., 2d ser., vol. 1, pp. 125-242. VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY. Laws of Virginia, 1642-1662. ‘‘Randolph”’ MS., Jefferson Collec- tion, Library of Congress. Dec. 1656/7th of Commonwealth. Compensations for losses suffered during the late expedition against the Indians. Jn Virginia Assembly et al., 1606-1692, pp. 207-208. — March 1655/6th of Commonwealth. Act XV. March 10th. In Virginia Assembly, 1642-1662, pp. 111-112 and Hening, 1819-1823, vol. 1, pp. 402-403. Dec. 1656-7th of Commonweatlth. [Hill vs. Commonwealth of Virginia]. Jn Virginia Assembly et al., 1609-1692, p. 200 and Hening, 1819-1823, vol. 1, pp. 422-423. VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY ET AL. Miscellaneous Records, 1606-1692. ‘Bland’ MS., 1606-1692, Jefferson Collection, Library of Congress. WESLAGER, CLINTON A. 1948. Monongahela woodland culture and the Shawnee. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 18, Nos. 1-2, pp. 19-22. Wuirtst, Marion E. 1961. Iroquois culture history in the Niagara frontier area of New York State. Univ. Michigan Mus. Anthrop., Anthrop. Pap. No. 16. AntNrOP |, 7» APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 245 WINTEMBERG, WILLIAM J. 1928. Uren prehistoric village site, Oxford County, Ontario. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 51, Anthrop. Ser. No. 10. 1936. Roebuck prehistoric village site, Grenville County, Ontario. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 88, Anthrop. Ser. No. 19. 1939. Lawson prehistoric village site, Middlesex County, Ontario. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 94, Anthrop. Ser. No. 25. 1948. The Middleport prehistoric village site. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 109, Anthrop. Ser. No. 27. Wirttuort, JOHN. 1950. The history and present status of Pennsylvania archeology. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 301-307. 1951. Iroquois archeology at the mid-century. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 311-321. 1952. Comments on the cultural position of the Heriot Farm Site. West Virginia Hist., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 249-253. 1954. Pottery from the Steward site, Clinton County. Pennsylvania Ar- chaeol., vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 22-29. [Located opposite McElhattan, on north bank of the west branch of the Susquehanna. Historic- non-Andaste.] WirrHort, JOHN, and Farver, S. S. 1952. Two Schenk’s Ferry sites in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. Penn- sylvania Archaeol., vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3-32. Wirrnort, JoHN, and Hunter, Wiuiiam A. 1955. The seventeenth-century origins of the Shawnee. Ethnohistory, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 42-57. Wray, CHARLES F. 1954. Index traits of the historic Seneca—1550-1687. Eastern States Archeol. Federation Bull., No. 138, p. 6. Wray, CHARLES F., and Scuorr, Harry L. 1953. A preliminary report on the Seneca sequence in western New York, 1550-1687. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 53-63. ¥ aa itu yet cb sO al A ; : to pa 1 aoe 2 Obie WF pr aS mats f Gf A eth whe Naber bv a: yj ith! 1 ab eM) gee val 7S : é bite ey UG ie ait ad sli Ga aol LAL BA Lah wt aa i tine TY £ 9a Hvar tir on BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 26 4 | | a ¢ 3 ry j ‘ eg ops ee $ <> Hi A 3 oS CG: i ; re —— . — Hoe A a7 L g —— ; 7 j rel LS es a 4 ~~ ‘ reat | 3 4eE ' 7 oa = x 4 {4 \ Ms ee a Rh. ps, : , Facsimile of section of Anonymous-Zuniga map of c. 1608. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 71 EL LIMON, AN EARLY TOMB SITE IN COCLE PROVINCE, PANAMA By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING 247 682—611—64——_20 _ 4 - es = : ug f \¥ Je : a cso 9) ee es = FOITITITeAT “VAToenrnee | qgofonta assimmA lo exerofl -_ 1@{ scitatlatl . {vo #nqed faciplononiind | a 31909 Vi ATIe EMOT YIWAR HA OMIT Ie AMAVIAT ADVIVOAL. SMLEAITS AGITAM on, .Y WAHTIAMW oi ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE (Follows page 254) 27. Incised slender vases. TEXT FIGURE i Pincised: sO DUlal POUSs cs oee 2 eee te eS ee es te 252 ROAT : ; - seenetawen-hevessores seat ns are see nsk- sablog teladoly . a ae | ee = f EL LIMON, AN EARLY TOMB SITE IN COCLE PROVINCE, PANAMA By Marruew W. and Marton Stiruine ! During the course of our archeological investigations in Panama in the month of April 1951, Mr. Simeén Conte of Penonomé guided us to an archeological site in the mountains back of Penonomé near a place called El Limén. The site consisted of a small burial ground with shoe-shaped shaft tombs about 8 feet deep scattered for 100 yards along the top of a high ridge. At the time of our arrival about nine tombs had been opened; these apparently were all that the looters had been able to find. Miguel Conte had acquired the contents of one of these tombs, which he generously gave to us. The grave offerings consisted of four tall slender vases and two globular pots with incised decorations. The four vases are similar in size and form (pl. 27). Each rests on a relatively small flat base tapering upward to a slender waist, then flaring outward to a wide trumpet-shaped rim. About two- thirds of the way upward each vase is encircled by a raised beveled ridge, the upper portion of which on three of the specimens is further embellished with small coffee-bean-like appliqued nodules. The nature of the incised decorations can best be seen in the illustrations. The natural color of the pottery is a pinkish buff, but a polished brown slip had been applied, remnants of which remain on all four examples. The tempering consists of crushed rock in which can be seen some large fragments of clear quartz. The two pots are of the same ware (fig. 17). They are subglobular in form with round bottoms. The smaller pot has an outflaring rim, and the other probably had a similar rim, but it has been entirely broken off. The body of each pot is almost completely covered with an incised herringbone design. The pattern on the smaller pot is particularly interesting as it is produced by negative incising— if such a term may be used. The incising was done with a broad chisellike instrument, producing between the strokes narrow raised ridges which form the design. 1 We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the Bureau of American Ethnology, for the line drawings in this paper. 251 252 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 4 a 4 SF ARE Ta OO Oo INCHES 8 a eS | cM. Ficure 17.—Incised globular pots. It is possible that the tall ‘‘vases’? were stands for the round- bottomed pots. This theory would sound more probable if it were possible to determine that there were originally four instead of two ae Th EL LIMON TOMB SITE, PANAMA—STIRLING 253 pots in the tomb. Had they been broken, it is likely the looters would have thrown them away. It is our impression that this is an early ware, possibly the earliest type of tomb ware from Panama. An apparently related type is found in Chiriqui. This type was first described by Holmes (1888, p. 87). In his classification of Chiriqui wares he describes it as the scarified group. Holmes states: This group is represented by about forty specimens and is worthy of especial attention. It comes from the graves of two localities, one near C. E. Taylor’s hacienda, north of David, on the slopes of Mount Chiriqui, and the other at Alanje, southwest of David. As a variety of ware it stands so entirely alone that had it arrived unlabeled no one would have recognized its affinities with Chiriquian art. It is rather inferior in material, grace of form, and surface finish, and the decoration appears to belong to a lower grade of culture than that of the other groups. Holmes speculates that it is a degenerate type, and therefore late. He says further (ibid., pp. 88-89): Nearly all of the vessels are tripods, but a few have rounded or flat bottoms and a few are supplied with annular stands. The walls are thick and the shapes are uncouth or clumsy. The paste is coarse, poorly baked, and friable; near the surface it is a warm reddish or yellowish gray; within the mass it is a dark gray... . These vessels are embellished by painting, incising, or scarifying and by modeling in relief. Color was not employed in the production of designs, but a dark Indian red pigment was daubed over that part of the surface not occupied by incised ornament. Little cr no slip was used and the rude geometric patterns were executed with pointed tools in a very haphazard manner. In general Holmes’ description fits the KE! Limén material, but there are a number of differences. His material has no vase forms, and tripod supports are lacking in the El Limén specimens as well as the application of red paint. The tripod supports are evidently solid. However, the scarified designs are similar, as are the flat and rounded bottoms. Scarified material is shown in Holmes’ illustrations (figs. 118 to 127). His figure 122 in particular resembles the material from El Limén. More recently, Wolfgang Haberland (1960) has published another find of ceramics closely similar to the Holmes material, from Aguas Buenas in Costa Rica, just across the border from Panama. At Mojara in Herrera Province, we found in our excavations a somewhat similar vase, associated with polychrome ware. This is a much more handsome piece and is made of harder, fine-textured ware. The encircling element consists of two notched fillet bands, the lower of which turns downward at each side to the base of the vessel. At this point on each side is a projecting conventionalized animal head from which two more notched fillets run downward, parallel with the other two. Under the outflaring rim is a triple row of heavy punctate dots. Between these and the encircling fillets is a zone of highly polished 254 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 rich mahogany brown slip. The interior of the vessel is of the same polished brown. The fundamental points of difference with the El Limén specimens is that the Mojara example has a hollow base, lacks the slender waist, and lacks incising. Also, it is somewhat larger, being 9! inches high. Dr. S. K. Lothrop kindly called to my attention a number of speci- mens, from near David, in the Peabody Museum, Harvard University (C-2809, C-2813, C-2817, C—2823) which also belong to this class of ware. Dr. Lothrop shares our impression that this is an early type of ware. While the small number of specimens from El! Limén make specula- tion unsafe, nevertheless we feel that this material, lacking paint and tripod supports, is the earlier form. The simple solid supports of the Chiriqui and Costa Rican sites may well be ancestral to the later developed hollow supports in the same area. The simple application of red paint may be a forerunner of the later elaborate polychrome ware, while the primitive applique work might precede the later more complex type found, for example, on Chiriqui alligator ware. The simple scarification and incising of El Limén ware could in turn be an outgrowth from the type of decoration found on the early Monagrillo ware. REFERENCES HABERLAND, WOLFGANG. 1960. Cien anos de arqueologia en Panama. Loteria No. 12. Panama. Hotmgss, W. H. 1888. Ancient art of the Province of Chiriqui, Colombia. 6th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. for 1884-85, pp. 3-187. BULLETIN 191 PLATE 27 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Incised slender vases. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 72 ARCHEOLOGICAL NOTES ON ALMIRANTE BAY, BOCAS DEL TORO, PANAMA By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING 255 682-611—64——_21 CONTENTS PAGE erGrocguction=s - Petar ot: ee eee ere ie eee es BARS IW RR ed ae we 259 ES HOm Calne Oro Ui Glee ee eee eee Ne ey eee 260 | o PEEVS WAIT CS) IDs CIS Es Neo Re SP xb ncn Ace SD ea oa See 263 DIPeIeeher DP ianinpen esas Meee aoe Al Ue eae ee KLE ee See 264 Darklands(Boc=h)wen sees ees. eel Shee eee e eee hottest 264. Wanrklamde (aver (BOG—2) ese e eS ce eee ee A 267 peace Drager 0G 3) eerie te Ee ee A ais Duele ge Ol Gates ee Bet cine el AU eh eee eel PE ee ba es) 277 Waecnotel arigiaee) 7.08 eee ee eee SRA Se Ree See ay a a 278 SIG PRA ye ne See Niet Se MENS hs ere re Oe NS yh TC rE ee Coe 278 Pe pies OU Oi Plies: aie 2 Pe De eee a, ee se hia 279 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES (All plates follow page 284) 28. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1. 29. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1. 30. Tripod vessels and subglobular bowls from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 31. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 32. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 33. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 34. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 35. Large vessels with high collars from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 36. Ceramic ware exteriors from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 37. Interiors of sherds shown in plate 36. 38. Nonceramic artifacts from Bocas del Toro, site 2. 39. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3. 40. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3. 41. Stone female figure from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay; stone metates from Cricamola River and Bastimentos Key. 42. Midden mound and mortars, Darkland Point. 43. Stone artifacts from Escudo Island, Jungle Point, and Darkland Cave. 44, Jaguar heads and double-bitted axes. TEXT FIGURES PAGE 18: Sherds from Bocas del Tore, ‘site U2... 5. 2-2 teste ee ee eee 266 19. Bow) with slated. pedestal base... =. 225 oo 268 20:) snerds trom Bocas del Lorawisite*2= .. 222. 22 Ae ee Bs 270 21.) Sherds rom boeds, del Lore, sive 2. 2) 246 Lk Ue ek 271 22; (Sherds from); Bocas del Toro, site: 2. 4.2 222... 2- buss. oh Reeelic tee, 272 Zo. phaliow bowltrom Bocas del Foro,)site 22.0.0 et 274 24 Shere froma isocas;del Toro, Site d24 20 220 gat oe ee ee el 276 fh nen 7 5 alvagtTvieo Zaa@ named os eee o Geet - alts aS a <. oi Be °C ETS EERE sag, | gl ne eee te © Pee ae my er ieee = et ey (ian) We geese ae ee .... &-208y aa9 B éi< sae ogta eater : -» a AH} oul ate, ) Pee en Pia -, +4004 BYE “ : ie ——— =e : haulst, ave ia ; | Mie) “wo. eee eohia W SVOTTAR TATE ey ATT (ERE yay Wola! aati (LA) i 4Jis io) (8b eaene diets out a J otls oot lob '4eotl cont saw ota i uite wt Ieb eanofl ator wlwod saiudcladie haw dea ° »& Mia OTGT lal 4amil sod saw blo ne ; Lal oOT fab eanofl ard) seaw ohn C wiz oT feb easohl daa S187f OF iY 4 S etie rot lab eet! mol aiew one © aliz- 0207 lat caso sol) enillan Agi! fire aloraby & L olie wi0T lab enq0ll moni! ewohsied ea ae a sieia al avwoth oteads ty agi 2 ath wT thb cesclt din eine bie a5) 2 at uno lbh 40008 inet new © 61 aol toh sabth nial Sh Pe Nur? vstnlony Siote ;4atl wtitedaiA >Draala? eave) mes] etna aaale AS Ve hnaMutl hua dole aluavl jocle! oboow’l ast elawtiien | Tal wninsmiteal ba» writ ala Antod bualisel! amivenr ban bag #ote Iuttid-aldpoh bua shed wand Stor TACT ere e -1 att rol Ini aneodl sooth at ; phe omy + pp bd. Indeed Teatial: dfiwt -2 str cas’? fob gaol! nnd ef ; . «8 Ot% moT bb econ ator ale a. nee Smee J eth owT sb andok orort gf eae 7 agp tetra sih rt ce a® |; . iia ARCHEOLOGICAL NOTES ON ALMIRANTE BAY BOCAS DEL TORO, PANAMA By Marraew W. ano Marion STIRLING INTRODUCTION Since there appears to be no information on the archeology of the Almirante Bay-Chiriqui Lagoon region, we, together with Richard H. Stewart, took occasion to visit briefly Almirante Bay during the month of April 1953 as an extension of our work for the National Geographic Society-Smithsonian Institution on the north coast of Panama the preceding winter. During 10 days of rather intensive activity, we visited all of the principal islands and a considerable portion of the mainland coast of Almirante Bay. Systematic questioning of natives elicited very little information as to archeological sites. Most informants denied having seen or heard of evidences of aboriginal occupation in the area. In- deed, on completion of our survey we concluded that archeological sites in the vicinity are neither numerous nor conspicuous. However, we did locate three sites worthy of excavation, and we photographed several carved stone objects found in the region. In the relatively level area north of Almirante, which has been extensively cleared for banana plantations, nothing appears to have come to light. In the remainder of the district the search for sites is hampered by the heavy growth of tropical jungle which covers most of the ground. The Almirante Bay-Chiriqui Lagoon region apparently followed the pattern of the rest of the north coast of Panama in that permanent settlements were established toward the headwaters of the rivers and not along the coast. The immediate incentive for our visit to Almirante was an invita- tion from Dr. Gustav Engler, director of the Chiriqui Land Company Hospital at that place. Dr. Engler has long been interested in the antiquities of Central America and has a small collection of artifacts from Costa Rica and Panama. 259 260 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 As a guide, Dr. Engler secured for us the services of Teodor F. Machazek, a longtime resident of the region and a surveyor well acquainted with the section. Through the courtesy of Mr. G. D. Munch, at that time superintendant of the Chiriqui Land Company, we were the guests of the company, enjoying the facilities of their spacious and comfortable guesthouse during our entire stay. We owe a particular debt also to Rev. Robert W. Turner III, who gen- erously gave us the use of his launch for our rather extensive survey. This courtesy was essential to the success of the work since almost all travel in the region is by water. We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the Bureau of American Ethnology, for the line drawings in this report. Finally, we wish to thank Mr. and Mrs. T. W. Dunn, who ac- companied us to Boca del Drago. They gave unstintingly of their time and information collected regarding archeological sites during a long residence in Central America while in the employ of the United Fruit Co. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Information concerning the aboriginal inhabitants of Almirante Bay and the Chiriqui Lagoon is very meager. However, there can be little doubt that the Indians occupying the region at the beginning of the 16th century were the Guaymi, whose descendants still live in the vicinity. Curiously enough, the most satisfactory descriptions are those of the Columbus expedition of 1502. The interpreters abducted by Columbus at Puerto Limén, Costa Rica, could speak the language of the natives as far south as the Coclé del Norte River, an area which corresponds pretty well with the hypothetical distribution of the Guaymi along this coast. Ferdi- nand Columbus, who gives the most complete account, does not describe the habitations of the natives encountered on Almirante Bay and the Chiriqui Lagoon, but he states that somewhat farther to the eastward they lived in single houses separated one from the other by considerable distances. He also states that their permanent habita- tions were not along the coast, but well up the rivers; an observation confirmed by our archeological reconnaissance in the area. Oviedo, in describing the 1536 expedition of Felipe Gutierrez on the north coast of Veraguas, relates that their villages normally consisted of four or five large houses. This description would seem to correspond with the archeological evidence at the Darkland site which we examined on Almirante Bay. The scant archeological remains around Almirante Bay and the Chiriqui Lagoon do not seem to bear out the rather considerable sy Po} P ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 261 population indicated by the Columbus accounts. It is probable that the natives living up the rivers heard of the coming of the ships of Columbus, the first to visit this coast, and descended to the bay for the occasion, thus accounting for an abnormal concentration of people. Ferdinand Columbus tells us that as soon as the ships anchored in Almirante Bay, which the natives called Carambaru, the boats went to one of the islands where there were 20 canoes on the beach. The natives were described as being ‘‘as naked as the day they were born.”’ One of these was wearing, hanging around his neck, a gold disk; another, a gold eagle. On the mainland the Spaniards were met by 10 canoes and saw con- siderably more gold worn in the form of ornaments. The men were described as wearing narrow loincloths as their only garments, with their faces and bodies painted all over with designs in red, black, and white. It is interesting to note that the Guaymi today still use these same colors for their face and body paintings, although now they have adopted clothing. Pedro de Ledesma says that at one place 80 canoes gathered around the ships, and that the natives wore gold ornaments consisting of “crowns,” disks, eagles, frogs, tigers, etc. These, of course, were of the same type as the gold ornaments that have been found in such abundance in graves in Chiriqui and Veraguas. Unfortunately, the Spaniards were not much interested in describing other aspects of material culture, although a number of stray items are mentioned. From Almirante Bay the ships of Columbus entered the Chiriqui Lagoon, called Aburena by the Indians. Here they were met in a more hostile manner by even greater numbers of Indians, who blew horns, beat drums, and created a tremendous din. This reminds us of the present-day noisemaking activities of the Guaymi during their “Balseria’’ ceremonies. At Guaiga, a river 12 leagues east of the Chiriqui Lagoon, the Spaniards again landed among a large concentration of Indians. Just beyond here, at a place called Catiba, Ferdinand Columbus says: This was the first place in the Indies where they saw any sign of a structure, which was a great mass of wall or imagry, that to them seemed to be of lime and stone; the admiral ordered a piece of it to be brought away as a memorial of that antiquity. Since Columbus speaks of the structure as “an antiquity,” it evidently was not constructed by the contemporary natives. When we were on our reconnaissance of the Panama north coast, we made diligent inquiries of many natives who professed to know the region well but all denied seeing or hearing of such a structure. We are inclined to believe that the men with Columbus saw some natural 262 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 formation, possibly a limestone dike, which they mistook for a wall. There is a great deal of limestone in this region, such as the cliff and ridge where our cave site Boc-2, at the east end of Almirante Bay, is located. In 1951 when we were on the Rio Indio we heard from several natives of a “‘casa de laja’”’ on one of the tributaries farther up the river. It was described as a stone masonry ruin, definitely not of Spanish construction. With the stone wall of Columbus in mind, we went to considerable trouble to visit the ruin, eventually succeeding. The ‘“‘casa de laja’”’ turned out to be a curious natural tunnel about 50 yards long through a horizontally stratified sandstone formation. The only evidence of occupation, past or present, was a huge cluster of bats hanging from the ceiling. At some time before 1540 an Aztec colony was established in the Sixaola Valley, on the mainland back of Almirante Bay. Before the middle of the 17th century this group, known as the Sigua, had moved to Bastimentos Island in Almirante Bay, where they eventually settled in four towns. Here they maintained themselves with varying degrees of fortune until about the year 1760. The interesting history of this band, the southernmost outpost of the Aztecs, has been out- lined by Lothrop. Rev. Ephraim Alphonse, who has lived among the Valiente Guaymi for more than 25 years and speaks the language fluently, has found some interesting traditions that evidently refer to this group. The Valiente Guaymi still retain the term ‘‘“Montezuma,”’ meaning ruler. A tradition which is frequently recounted at the present time re- lates to the ‘‘Dekos,”’ a group of conquerors who came from the north in large canoes having paddles studded with pearls. Their leader was called Siri Klave. ‘The Dekos are always pictured as being more civilized and smarter than the Guaymi. Some of the tales refer to contests in wits between Guaymi and Dekos leaders. In these contests the Guaymi were always defeated, as they were in military combat (Alphonse, 1956). We spent considerable time on Bastimentos in a futile search for remains that might indicate a settlement of the Aztec Colony, which all the evidence seems to indicate was located here. Not only did our personal search result negatively, excepting for a few nondescript sherds near the mouth of a small stream by the present village of Bastimentos, but the old inhabitants who had spent their lives farming on the island insisted that they had seen no sherds nor other evidence of occupation, except a metate and a mano (pl. 41). We visited the spots where these were found, but saw no evidence of a site. After the voyage of Columbus, the Almirante region acquired a reputation for being rich in gold. It was frequently visited thereafter Ant ron. rap. ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 263 by gold seekers and slavers with the result that native culture was pretty well broken down. There is little in the records of these more or less transient visits that is of help to the archeologist. Modern accounts of the Guaymi are unsatisfactory, even for areas considerably removed from the Northwest Panama Coast. During the last quarter of the 19th century A. L. Pinart made some observations on the Guaymi of the Chiriqui Lagoon region, and more recently they have been studied by Ephraim Alphonse. Practically all of the available early source material has been collected and published by Lothrop (1950) in his excellent Veraguas report. CERAMIC STUDIES A considerable amount of time was spent in examining the temper of the various wares from the several sites herein described. The only instruments used in this connection were small hand lenses. Samples of the wares were shown to several professional archeologists. Their conclusions as to the nature of the tempering material differed so widely among themselves and with our own tentative determina- tions that we decided to follow the advice of Miss Anna O. Shepherd of the Ceramic Technological Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., and describe them in general terms rather than to guess at specific descriptions, a practice likely to lead to false assumptions. All clays are originally derived from decomposition of igneous rocks and contain a certain amount of grit and fragments of un- altered rock. With the naked eye or a hand lens it is impossible to tell in most instances whether the grit is natural or hand ground. In general, the temper of the pottery from Almirante Bay is rounded sand mixed with angular particles. Similar difficulties were experienced in studying the nature of slips. It was not always possible to distinguish between self slips, applied slips, and effects obtained by polishing. Here again we have tried to be not too categorical in our designations. Hardness was determined by scratch tests in accordance with the Mohs scale. Of the pottery excavated in the three Almirante Bay sites, the significant pieces are illustrated and complete data are given with the descriptions of each plate. Since the excavations were small, we felt that it would be pre- mature to give names to the pottery types encountered. Colors have been identified in the Munsell color system. As every ceramist knows, the colors of primitive pottery vary considerably because of uneven firing conditions, as well as other factors. The 264 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 same pot may contain several colors, blending, for example, from weak yellowish orange, to moderate orange, light brown, and black. In describing the pottery this fact has been taken into consideration and the best personal opinion given of each specimen illustrated in order to convey to the reader a proper understanding of the wares. The laboratory studies were made under fluorescent light. In instances where the buff has definitely fired moderate orange, it is so described. In Boc-1 and Boc-3, the buffs generally fired orange. In Boc-2, the buffs frequently fired brown. The equivalents of Munsell color symbols are given according to 1.S.C.C. (Inter-Society Color Council) Standards. When a specimen is unique, the Munsell equivalent is given in the text (Judd and Kelly, 1939). The following tabulation gives the general color equivalents used in this paper: Munsell I.8.C.C. ighispuit ee TY S20) Se ones Pale yellowish orange. Buh Oia iad SO LOM 4S 2 Oe is ee Weak yellowish orange. LOVERS /Ge ts Set Weak yellowish orange. TONPRG/AS = Meee ee Light yellowish brown. Darkibuiiese. -eees ‘yp R751 sae oe eee reer Light brown. Dark brownies 2252 = OWE Zee Sere Dusky brown. Gravee. Sosa ne Ra aE) eat i el Moderate orange. HOR S/S. toate et Moderate reddish orange. Rliedke at. teers aes GRS5/S ieee re iG Moderate red. PORE Soe Bae eS Moderate reddish brown. Dupaky rede: be si \5_ ae DR): ee ae Dusky red. Deep Teds 86 5-2 Otte] ee eee Deep red. SITE DESCRIPTIONS DARKLAND (BOC-1) In the southern part of the bay, south of Cristobal Island, a long narrow point known as Darkland projects into the bay. This had been partially cleared for cultivation and the grazing of stock. The peninsula is formed by a rather flat-topped ridge which gradually increases in elevation from the point. Scattered along the top of this ridge were four large mortars made from unshaped stones (pl. 42,6). Just above this area and about 300 yards from the point, we discovered four midden mounds, each about 40 feet in diameter and 5 feet in height; apparently each was the refuse mound for a single house. Having no facilities for carrying much material at the time of our visit, we made in one of these mounds a single small excavation about 4 feet square and 2 feet deep. The mound proved to be rich in sherds and other materials. Among the more abundant forms were subglobular bowls, with incurving rims, of buff-colored ware with a A OMo1 P? ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 265 coarse temper. This ware is characterized by a gray to black core, with margins ranging from weak yellowish orange to moderate orange. These were decorated with elongate punctations in rows, between incised parallel lines. The designs are geometric and tend toward triangular forms. Some of these bowls were further decorated with small nodes or bosses connected with incised lines or roughened bands. One specimen was of much thicker ware and had an excurvate rim (pl. 28, a-“). Also abundant were sherds of large vessels with modeled applique designs on the body. One had two leaping porpoises (pl. 29, a). Another was an octopus (pl. 28, 7), while still another fragment displayed what seems to be the tail of a fish (pl. 28, n). One curious sherd consists of what appears to be a thick beveled rim with rectangular openings cut below the rim. It is possible that it is a part of a slotted pedestal base. If so, it is unusually thick and heavy (pl. 29, f; fig. 18, e). Other pieces were from large pots with slightly outcurving rims. Some of these have red paint on the lip, others on either the exterior or interior. The majority are polished light buff on the interior (pls. 28; 29, e, 1). Excurvate, buff-colored rims with combed decoration on the interior and smooth on the exterior were almost identical with similar pieces from the site at Boca del Drago (Boc-3). This is a buff-colored ware with coarse tempering material (pl. 28, &). One of the most individual wares is rather thin with finely ground temper and fine line red painting on a light buff slip (pl. 28, m). Two sherds appear to be longitudinal sections of hollow vessel supports. The fact that one of these has horizontal red line painting strengthens this hypothesis since this is a normal type of decoration for the typical conical base tripod vessel characteristic of Chiriqui, ex- amples of which were found in the nearby cave site (Boc-2). Several small sherds were of very thin fine paste ware with polished surface painted red on buff. Because of the small size of the sherds it was impossible to deduce the vessel forms, but they were probably of small size. Thick body sherds from large pots were quite abundant. These had a coarse sand temper and were usually fired buff on the exterior and black on the interior. Some of these had combed decoration on the exterior, some were smooth. This is apparently the same ware as that with modeled animals on the body, and is analogous to the large urns from Boc-3. One flat awl with sharp point and sharp edges, made apparently from the leg bone of a deer, was the only bone implement found. 266 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 h ) Ficure 18.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 1. a, Large rim sherd with applique porpoises, smooth orange interior, pl. 29, a; b, buff punctate bowl, smooth rim, triangular design, pl. 28, a; c, buff interior, exterior blackened with charcoal, pl. 29, b; d, smooth buff exterior and interior, pl. 29, 7; e, heavy slotted rim (or base ?), pl. 29, f; f, light buff exterior and interior, red painted rim, pl. 29, d; g, smooth buff exterior and interior, punctate ware with incising, pl. 28, b; h, buff surfaces, interior of rim is combed, pl. 28, k; 1, light buff exterior and interior with red painted lip, pl. 29, c; 7, rough buff punctate ware with incising, pl. 28, c; k, smooth buff interior with red painted lip, pl. 28, 0; J, smooth buff with inside lip painted red, pl. 29, k; m, smooth light buff interior with lip painted red, pl. 29, 7; n, smooth light buff interior, charcoal on exterior, lip painted red, pl. 29, e. Scattered throughout the excavation were a number of flint flakes and many coral branches. The above-described material, it should be remembered, came from a small test pit and represents at best a most incomplete sample. Anoo%o1 P ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 267 Boc-1 is by far the most promising site that we located on our survey of Almirante Bay. The small mounds are rich in content and a full scale excavation would without doubt give key results for this virtually unknown area. DARKLAND CAVE (BOC-2) On a high jungle-covered ridge about 2 miles southwest of the Dark- land peninsula there is a limestone cliff about 100 feet high. Along the base of this cliff are a number of caves containing the remains of human burials and accompanying offerings. The native who guided us to this spot had discovered the caves a few years before and said that he and his father had removed several complete pots, of which he was unable to give an adequate description, and a stone metate carved in the form of a jaguar. We selected the most promising looking of the caves and excavated it completely. The cave, whose opening was about 20 feet across, ex- tended about 30 feet into the cliff, with a ceiling of irregular height. The last 20 feet of the cave was filled to within about a foot of the ceiling and could not be entered until the fill was removed. The bulk of the artifacts recovered and a few fragments of human bone were in the upper 12 inches of the deposit. No evidence of human occupation was found below this surface level, although the fill averaged from 3 to 4 feet in depth. Objects of stone consisted of a well-carved jaguar head broken from a metate of Costa Rica-Chiriqui type, and eight celts of mediocre finish (pl. 43, g-n). There were none of the type with flaring edge so common in Veraguas. One small triangular polished celt of a blue slatelike stone is 10 cm. long and 5 cm. wide at the blade. It is flat on one side and convex on the other. A chisel of limestone was 19.5 em. long. There was also a small polishing stone of bright red jasper about 5 cm. in diameter (pl. 38, e, f, g). Scattered throughout the surface layer were many large marine conchs, principally Strombus gigas Linné and Charonia iritonis nobilis Conrad, and about 20 arti- facts of unknown use made from the spire of the conch with a circular hole 5 cm. in diameter in the center (pl. 38, a—d). Although five or six nearly complete vessels were recovered, the bulk of the pottery was in the form of scattered sherds, representing a considerable variety of forms and wares. Apparently, the great majority of the vessels originally had a buff-colored surface, although some examples were dark buff and brown. In addition, various sherds are blackened by carbon, discolor- ing the surface as well as the paint. All the sherds are coated to a certain extent with a white deposit caused by the dust in the limestone cave, a condition making it 268 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 difficult to decide the original color of the pottery. In some instances, the red paint has turned orange and in others, dusky brown; it is difficult to decide the original hue. One example of this wide range in hue can be seen on the horizontal red line striping on the legs of the tripod vessel (pl. 30, 6). There were five examples of tripod vessels, two of which are fairly complete. One of these consists of smooth buff ware well coated with lime on both interior and exterior (pl. 30, a). The outflaring rim is 4.7 cm. wide. The interior is decorated with four groups of seven red perpendicular lines 0.3 cm. wide, spaced quadrilaterally. Each grouping is approximately 3.8 cm. wide. The edge of the rim is also painted red. The other fairly complete specimen has the rim missing, but this was probably a bowl-shaped form (pl. 30, b). The body is roughened by horizontal striating. The legs are smooth, decorated with hori- zontal red line painting and three perpendicular slots 5.0 cm. long, 0.5 cm. wide. Two slots are on either side of the leg, near the top; the other in the center front near the foot, which is broken off. The most nearly complete leg has a modeled animal figure seated on the upper edge. The interior of the vessel is smooth and buff in color. Most of the exterior is blackened by carbon. This specimen is almost identical with two figured by Wassén, 1949 (figs., 9, a; 10) found near Boquete, Chiriqui. Of the remaining three examples, two were of the buff striated type and the other, consisting of a conical base, is of thick buff ware. The O / SCALE IN INCHES ee (oa a Piva aE ime Ua le al rie Pee re ae PII ais: Sal ation Ry aloha: —— aS — ee = SQ ——— ae. RED BLACK BUFF Ficure 19.—Bowl with slotted pedestal base. Black core, dark buff margins; fine temper; base and interior of bowl polished dark buff; deep red slip on exterior of bowl on which were painted black perpendicular stripes extending from the rim to the juncture with the base; see pl. 31, f. Anthrop. Pap. "No. 72] - ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 269 exterior is polished and partially dark brown from carbon. All of these are of hard fine-tempered ware, with black core and buff margins. There was one small pedestal base bowl (pl. 31, f; fig. 19) with three rectangular horizontal slots in the base. The base and the interior of the bowl are polished dark buff ware. The exterior of the bowl has a deep red slip on which were painted black perpendicular stripes extending from the rim to the juncture with the base, 6.8 cm. long. Vestiges of eight stripes can be seen on the portion of the bowl which was found. Whether the stripes encircled the entire bowl or were painted in groups cannot be ascertained. The ware has a fine temper, is rather thin, and is fired to a dark buff on the surfaces with a black core. This was the only pedestal base found. Frying-pan incensarios were represented by one specimen, a trans- verse piece broken off from the base of the handle. It is made from a hard fine-tempered ware with a buff polished surface. It is painted red along the edges and has one transverse red line, 0.6 cm. wide (pl. 33, c). Similar but complete examples of this type were found by us at the Coclé site of Mojara in Herrera Province. Small plain subglobular bowls were represented by seven speci- mens, two of which were more or less complete (pl. 30, c, d). These are rather crudely made from a buff-colored ware. The surface typically is carelessly smoothed. Plate 30, c, has a body diameter of 8.4 cm. and a body height of 8.0cm. Plate 30, d, has a body diameter of 11.0 cm. and a body height of 7 cm. Two of the subglobular bowls were polished brown, one polished dark buff, and another buff with a red lip. Most had small outflaring rims, some with rolled lips. Some were carbonized on the exterior from having been on an open fire. The rim variations can best be seen from the illustrations (pl. 33, a, 6, e, f). One variation consisted of a combed exterior with a crude rectangular pattern and small nodes on the shoulder (pl. 31, 6). There were eight examples of bowls with vertical strap handles. Judging from the fragments found, these had been low hemispherical bowls with outflaring rims to which were attached a pair of opposing strap handles (pl. 31, a, c, d, g; fig. 21, e, f, g, 6). Plate 31, a, is made of polished dark buff ware weathered brown in places. The lip of the rim is painted red and extends 1 cm. onto the top of the strap handle. Directly in front of the strap handle on the interior of the outflaring rim are six vertical red lines, 0.2 cm. wide, 3 em. long. The strap handle was modeled and stuck on the pot care- lessly. It is 3.5 cm. wide. Plate 31, ¢, is buff ware with a rim painted red extending 0.4 cm. down the exterior of the bowl and 0.4 cm. onto the strap handle, where it joins the rim. There is an irregular spot of red paint on the 270 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 J apa ) Figure 20.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Shallow bowl, pedestal base (?), red painted lip, dark buff interior and exterior, pl. 34, g; b, buff ware with smooth interior and exterior and red lip; c, buff ware, lip painted red with traces of red on interior; d, buff ware, red painted lip and convex curving collar, exterior carbon coated, pl. 36, ); e, shallow bowl or pedestal base (?), lip painted red, dark buff interior, red design on interior; f, polished buff interior, exterior rough and carbonized, red lip, pl. 32, 7; g, buff ware with a rough exterior, smooth, interior, and fine temper, pl. 36, d; h, buff ware, carbonized black, polished interior, rough exterior, pl. 36, f; 1, red painted lip, rough exterior and smooth buff interior; 7, rough carbonized exterior and smooth buff interior; k, rough exterior and smooth buff interior. body of the vessel. The temper is coarse. The exterior of the vessel and the rim are smooth, while the interior is slightly rough. The strap handle is 2.7 cm. wide. Plate 31, d, is buff ware weathered brown. The rim probably had been painted red. There appears to have been a strip of pottery Anim oP] 2 ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 271 Ficure 21.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Buff ware, exterior blackened by carbon, had strap handle, incised design, roughened zones, bosses, smooth interior, pl. 31, e; b, buff with loop handle, covered with limestone dust inside and out, pl. 31, g; thin buff tripod jar, carbonized exterior and smooth interior; d, polished dark buff interior and exterior, pl. 33, b; e¢, polished dark buff, lip painted red and vertical lines on interior of rim, strap handle, pl. 31, a; f, buff interior and exterior with red rim, pl. 31, c; g, buff weathered brown with smooth interior and exterior and strap handle, pl. 31, d; h, buff, polished interior, exterior of rim roughened, pl. 33, f; 7, buff weathered brown with polished interior, pl. 33, a. appliqued on top of the strap handle as decoration. The handle is 1.7 cm. wide. One specimen has a plain incurving rim. This had a roughened zone below the rim, decorated with incised lines connecting small hemispherical nodes. Another roughened zone runs around the middle of the bowl. The edge of the rim is painted dark red (pl. 31, e; fig. 21, a). 682-611 6422 [Bull. 191 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 272 Ficure 22. opposite page.) Forl egend, see An 21 8P- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 273 Plate 31, g, shows buff ware with a rolled everted rim and a loop handle. The most abundant form consisted of fragments of 17 large sub- spherical pots with medium outflaring rims. Of these, three were sufficiently complete to give an idea of the body shape. There is considerable individual variation in the rim forms (pl. 34, a, }, ¢; He 22 as, e)). One broken, but almost complete, example had the entire exterior surface roughened as though by rolling it with a corncob or a rough fabric. The interior is well smoothed. The lip is painted red. A series of rather undefined vertical ridges runs around the middle of the body as an additional decorative feature, and a series of indenta- tions runs around the base of the collar (pl. 34, a; fig. 22, a). The remaining examples are carelessly smoothed on the exterior and carefully smoothed on the interior. Some had red-painted lips and some were coated with carbon from being over an open fire. The ware is coarse, fired to a black core, with moderately reddish orange margins and dark-buff surfaces. Most have plain round lips, but on two examples the lips are beveled. There were seven fragments (six illustrated) from large vessels with high collars (pl. 35; fig. 22, ¢, f). The collars are roughened on the exterior by combing. One has a smooth zone below the point where the collar joins the body; below this the combing begins again (pl. 35, d). In all examples the interior is carefully smoothed. Two had a red-painted lip. On the rim, one sherd has part of an appliqued octopus, suggestive of similar designs from Boc-3. This sherd has a dark-buff polished interior and a red-painted lip. The exterior is rather rough (pl. 35, a, fig. 22, d). Large shallow bowls were represented by two specimens. These are similar in form to the pedestal base “‘fruteras’ from Coclé and Veraguas, but probably did not have such bases since none were found in Boc-2. One of the specimens has a beveled lip, painted red, and Ficure 22.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Buff ware, red painted lip, smooth interior, roughened exterior, pl. 34, a; b, buff ware, red lip, exterior rough and somewhat blackened, pl. 34, ¢; c, buff ware, smooth interior, exterior of collar combed, smooth on exterior below collar, pl. 35, c; d, dark buff polished interior, exterior blackened, rough, applique design, lip painted red, pl. 35, a; ¢, dark buff ware, roughly combed collar, smooth interior, pl. 34, b; f, polished dark buff interior, combed exterior, pl. 35, b; g, polished buff ware, fine combing on collar, smooth below collar, deep incised groove separating collar from body, pl. 9, h; A, smooth buff slip on interior, exterior rough, pl. 36, 1; 1, smooth buff interior, exterior rough, deep groove separates collar from body, red lip, pl. 36, &; 7, polished buff on interior, roughened exterior, red lip, pl. 36, e; 2, dark- buff ware, smooth interior, rough exterior, lip painted red, pl. 34, e; /, body sherd, buff ware coated with limestone dust, smooth exterior and interior; m, dark buff ware, smooth interior and exterior, pl. 34, f; , polished buff interior, rough buff interior; 0, carbonized buff ware, smooth interior and exterior, pl. 36, c. 274. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 has a smooth exterior and interior (pl. 34, g; fig. 20, a). The other has a plain lip also painted red, and a design consisting of six red stripes 0.6 cm. wide and 7.5 cm. long projecting into the dark buff interior. Each stripe is rounded at the end, not blunt or squared off (pl. 34, d; figs. 23, 20, e). Theexterior isroughened by combing below - Kixse Kooy x « BSI RS KS ore KX, SCALE /N INCHES (i 2 Oot Ly CM. Ficure 23.—Shallow bowl from Bocas del Toro, site 2. Polished dark buff interior decorated with 6 red stripes and red painted lip. Exterior badly eroded but apparently had vertical ridges around middle similar to pl. 34, a. Medium temper. 1 cm. thick. the rim, and below this is a row of roughened verticalridges. In both examples the ware is fairly thick and is grit tempered. The color on the surface is dark buff, weathered a dark brown. There were four body sherds of thin, hard, fine paste ware, evenly fired, with no black core, 0.4 cm. thick. Three of these have a dark- orange (2.5YR 5/8) (Munsell system) smooth surface, while the other has a burnished-brown (10YR 3.8/2) exterior surface. These are definitely different from the other sherds. There were three sherds of red on buff ware. Two are rims with red-painted lip and fine vertical red lines on the interior of the rim. The sherds are 0.8 and 0.6 cm. thick, respectively. The interior is polished, the exterior rough (pl. 32, f, h). The other example is a body sherd with smooth surface, having painted on it a simple red-line geometric design. The interior is smooth and unpainted buff (pl. 32, e). Among the miscellaneous specimens was a low concave vessel support painted red where it joined the body of the vessel. The remainder of the exterior and the interior are buff. The beveled supporting edge is roughened with diagonal scoring (pl. 33, d). An oP ot *P- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 275 The neck of a small jar was of rather thin dark-buff ware. It was encircled by two parallel rounded ridges decorated with crude incising (pl. 32, b). Part of the neck of a small vessel of hard medium-tempered ware was decorated with lunate punctations in parallel rows between double incised lines. This decorated area is separated by a rounded ridge between incised lines from a smooth-zoned red band. ‘The interior is definitely painted red on one half, probably the neck. The other half is buff. The exterior design was zoned red on buff (pl. 32, ¢). One sherd of rather thick, hard ware has a polished dark buff (carbonized almost black) exterior with part of a raised design (pl. 32, d). Among other miscellaneous pieces was a flat base of dark-buff ware (pl. 32, a). The cave site (Boc-2) was probably a burial place, in which had been placed offerings of shell, stone, and pottery. There was no evidence of fires having been made in the cave. Furthermore, the lowness of the ceiling would not have made it a suitable dwelling site, nor would its location near the summit of a high steep mountain. The presence of fragments of human bones would seem to make its burial function certain. The pottery shows a connection on the one hand with that from Boc-3 and on the other hand with Chiriqui ware from the vicinity of Boquete. The lowest point, for some distance, in the Continental Divide lies directly south of Almirante Bay in direct line with Boquete. An old trail which is still in use crosses this pass from the northern part of the Chiriqui Lagoon. It is probable that this natural route was in use in aboriginal times. BOCA DEL DRAGO (BOC-3) At the extreme northwestern corner of Almirante Bay the Boca del Drago is a narrow pass separating the mainland from Colon Island. On Colon Island, on the east side of the pass, just below Cauro Point, there is a cove with a crescent-shaped sand beach. At a point toward the south end of the beach there was formerly an aboriginal site, which has been largely destroyed in recent years by wave action from storms. Several native fishermen living on the cove told of large urns being exposed on the beach after these storms. As described, these urns were as much as 3 feet in height, with wide mouths and high outflaring collars or rims. We conducted excavations on the beach in the area indicated and found numerous sherds of such urns as well as fragments of smaller vessels. There were also a few nondescript fragments of human bones, suggesting that the large vessels were burial urns. 276 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 } 9 y We made some tests in the forested, undisturbed soil back of the The sherds recovered from the beach exhibited a fair variety. Characteristically at this site, the paste was fired brownish black in os Ic CM ‘cme ——————4 Geer Natt fine regular combing on exterior, band of extremely fine combing extending 2.5 cm. below lip, pl. 39, 5; b, similar to ‘‘a” but with smooth area below lip and above fine combed combed or impressed, grooved indentations outlining rim, 1.3 cm. from lip, pl. 30, a; d, polished orange interior and rim, exterior buff blackened by carbon and rather rough, same as ‘‘c,” pl. 40, 5; g, smooth buff interior, buff exterior has regular combing aisnilar tOr va and “*b,” pl. 40, c; h, 1, smooth buff interior and exterior, pls. 40, 7, and 40, d, beach, but found no traces of a village site or burials. the core, to buff and moderate orange on the surface. In some ex- A Figure 24.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 3. a, Polished orange interior and lip, area, pl. 39, 7; c, buff interior and exterior, red paint on exterior of rim, interior deeply pl. 39, d; e, dark buff blackened by carbon, smooth interior and exterior, pl. 39, ¢; f, respectively. Ane oy» ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 277 amples, it was fired 100 percent moderate orange. In other examples the moderate orange surface is definitely due to polishing. In others (pl. 40, d), the orange interior over buff paste may be due to a self wash. Probably all the clay with coarse and moderate temper is the same, and the buff or orange color variations are due to firing conditions. The fine-tempered pastes (pls. 39, a; 40, 7, k) are defi- nitely different. Evidently smaller vessels were normally of a globular form with rims that differed from straight to excurvate in varying degrees. Some of these were painted red. Some excurvate rims were decorated by combing on the interior (pl. 40, a, 6), but had a smooth exterior. These were buff with a medium temper. One rim fragment had a looped handle attached to the rim (pl. 39, g). This piece was very coarse tempered and had a smooth orange-buff exterior and interior. It is very similar to a specimen found near Boquete, Chiriqui, and figured by Wassén (Wassén, 1949, fig. 37). Another example was found by us at Utivé, Province of Panama. One solid tapering piece could have been a vessel support or a heavy handle (pl. 40, 2). A sherd of fine-paste, dusky yellowish-orange (8YR 6/6) ware, had on it the applique figure of an animal. This piece is typical Chiriqui alligator ware (pl. 39, a). There was a single sherd of fine-tempered ware with a painted design. The decoration consisted of bold red and black parallel lines on a light-buff surface (pl. 40, e). The only indication of the use of stone was a number of flint chips or rejects. On the whole, the ware of Boc-3 shows a close affinity to that in Boc-1. JUNGLE POINT On a heavily forested ridge back of Almirante and near Western River, we visited another site, where we conducted some excavations with unsatisfactory results. A native who had made a clearing on top of the ridge and had built a thatched hut told us he had found potsherds, a clay figurine of a woman, and some stone specimens while excavating a level place for his house. The figurine had been lost, but we obtained from him three celts, two of a fine-grained bluish- black stone and the other light gray. There was also a pestle of limestone (pl. 43, c-f). We excavated in an area adjoining the house, but found only a few nondescript potsherds. 278 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 The most interesting point in connection with this site is that it demonstrates that habitation sites apparently existed occasionally on the tops of steep ridges. COCOS ISLAND We visited Cocos Island, one of the larger islands in the bay, where we heard the familiar story that the natives knew of no ancient habitation sites. One man, however, had found an interesting basalt figure of Costa Rican type, which we photographed (pl. 41, a-8). The figure represents a standing woman, holding her breasts in her hands, with a human head hanging on her back. The finder of the figure led us to the spot where the find had been made, but we saw no evidence of a habitation there. BIBLIOGRAPHY ALPHONSE, EpHraim §. n.d. Among the Valiente Indians. London. 1956. Guaymi grammar and dictionary, with some ethnological notes. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 162. CoLuMBUS, FERDINAND. 1744. The history of the life and actions of Admiral Christopher Columbus. In “A collection of Voyages and Travels,’”’? by Awnsham and John Churchill, vol. 1. London. Jupp, Dranr B., and Ketiy, Kennetu L. 1939. Method of designating colors. Journ. Research Nat. Bur. Stand., vol. 23. Loturop, SAMUEL K. 1942. The Sigua: southernmost Aztec outpost. Proc. 8th Amer. Scien. Cong., vol. 2. Washington. 1950. Archaeology of southern Veraguas, Panama. Peabody Mus. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ., Mem. vol. 9, No. 3. Pinart, ALPHONSE L. 1885. Chiriqui. Bocas del Toro. Bull. Soc. Geogr. France, septieme serie, tome 6. Paris. Santo THoMAS, ADRIAN DE. 1950. Conversion of Guaymi and Darién and its Indians. Ed. and trans. by E. B. Adams and Doris Stone. Jn ‘‘Archaeology of southern Veraguas, Panama,” by 8. K. Lothrop, appendix 2, pp. 96-103. SHEPARD, ANNA O. 1956. Ceramics for the archaeologist. Carnegie Inst. Washington, Publ. 609. Wassin, Henry. 1949. Contributions to Cuna ethnography: Some archaeological observa- tions from Boquete, Chiriquf, Panamdé. Etnologiska Studier No. 16, Etnografiska Mus., Goteborg, Sweden. Anthrop-,PaP- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 279 EXPLANATION OF PLATES PLATE 28 a-t, Characterized by gray to black core with margins varying from weak yel- lowish orange to moderate orange. Moderate coarse temper. a, Punctate bowl, smooth rim. Eroded granular orange exterior. Smooth buff interior. See figure 18, b. b, Punctate with incising. Smooth buff interior. 1.5 em. thick. Figure 18, g. c, Punctate with incising. Smooth interior. Exterior eroded and granular. 1.0 em. thick. See figure 18, 7. d-f, h, i, Punctate and incised. Exterior and interior smooth orange. 0.6 —1 cm. thick. g, Punctate and incised, with boss. 1 cm. thick. j, Buff core and surfaces. Interior and exterior smooth with indented fillet applied just below rim. 0.7 cm. thick. k, Gray core, buff surfaces. Smooth exterior. Interior of rim combed. 1.0 em. thick. See figure 18, h. l, Buff core and surfaces. Smoothinterior. Mediumtemper. Modeled octopus applique design. 0.8 em. thick. m, Light buff slip with fine line red painting. Finely ground temper. 0.5 cm. thick. n, Very coarse buff ware. Interior granular. Fishtail applique design on ex- terior. 2.0 cm. thick. o, Smooth light buff interior, red painted lip. See figure 18, k. PLATE 29 a, Large rim sherd with applique porpoises. Brownish-black core, orange margins. Interior and rim, well-polished orange. Exterior shows very fine marks of smoothing implement, perhaps cornhusk or other similar leaf. Coarse to very coarse temper. 1.2 cm. thick. See figure 18, a. b, Brownish-black core, buff margins. Polished buff interior and rim. Exterior, slightly rough, blackened by carbon. Coarse temper. c, Black core, buff margins. Smooth buff interior and lip. Exterior, slightly rough. Medium temper. Lip painted red and remnants of red painted designs on exterior and interior. 11cm. thick. See figure 18, 7. d, Black core, moderate orange to buff margins. Medium temper. Smooth light buff exterior and interior. Rim painted red, extending 2.5 cm. down exterior. 1.1 cm. thick. See figure 18, f. e, Brownish black core, buff margins. Medium temper. Smooth light buff interior and exterior. Rim painted red. Exterior blackened by carbon. 1.1 cm. thick. See figure 18, n. f, 80 percent brownish black core, orange to buff margins. Coarse temper. Smooth orange interior and exterior. Rectangular openings had been cut below rim. 2.0—2.5 em. thick. g, 90 percent brownish-black core and outer surface, 10 percent inner surface buff. Very coarse, heavily tempered. Granular interior. Exterior combed. 1.5 em. thick. h, Brownish-black core, buff exterior. Medium temper. Interior smooth and exterior slightly roughened. i, Light buff, medium temper. Smooth exterior and interior. Interior shows narrow parallel ridges made by rubbing stone. 1.5 cm. thick. j, Brownish-black core, buff margins, coarse temper. Smooth light buff interior and exterior. Red-painted rim. 1.2 cm. thick. See figure 18, m. k, Black core, buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff interior and exterior. Inside of lip painted red. 0.5-0.8 cm. thick. See figure 18, J. 280 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 PLATE 30 a, Tripod vessel. Black core, buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff ex- terior and interior. Completely coated with white dust from the limestone cave. Four groups of red perpendicular lines on the interior of rim. 0.5 cm. thick. b, Tripod vessel. Some parts of bowl burned 100 percent buff, others black core and buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff interior. Most of ex- terior blackened by carbon. Body roughened by horizontal striating. Legs are smooth and decorated with horizontal red line painting. Modeled animal figure seated on top one leg. Three perpendicular slots in leg. 0.7 em. thick. c, Subglobular bowl. Black core, buff margins and surfaces. Fine temper. Exterior and interior rough. d, Subglobular bowl. Black core and margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff interior and exterior. Puate 31 a, Polished dark buff. Fine temper. Exterior and interior smooth. Edge of rim painted red. Red perpendicular line decoration on interior of rim. Strap handle shows finger marks where attached. 0.6 cm. thick. See figure 21, e. b, Combed buff exterior. Smooth carbonized interior. Medium temper. Small nodes on the shoulder. 0.8 cm. thick. c, Buff. Coarse temper. Smooth exterior. Interior pitted. Rim painted red. Strap handle. 0.7 cm. thick. See figure 21, f. d, Buff weathered brown. Medium temper. Interior and exterior smooth. 0.6 cm. thick. See figure 21, g. e, Buff. Fine temper. Polished interior. Carbonized exterior has roughened zone below the rim, decorated with incised lines connecting hemispherical nodes. Another roughened area runs around center of bowl. Edge of rim painted dark red. See figure 21, a. f, Bowl with slotted pedestal base. Black core, dark buff margins. Fine temper. Base and interior of bowl, polished dark buff. Deep red slip on exterior of bowl. 0.6 cm. thick. See figure 19. g, Buff paste. Medium temper. Exterior smooth but pitted by erosion. In- terior eroded. Rolled everted rim, loop handle. See figure 21, b. PLATE 32 a, Flat base. Dark buff weathered brown. Fine temper. Exterior and in- terior smooth. 0.7 cm. thick. b, Neck of small jar. Thin dark buff partially carbonized. Fine temper. Interior smooth. Exterior, two parallel fillets decorated with crude incising. 0.6 cm. thick. c, Buff paste. Medium temper. Buff interior, partially painted red. Exterior, red on buff, with lunate punctations between double incised lines. 0.5 em. thick. d, Interior and exterior, polished dark buff weathered brown. Fine temper. Raised design. e, Exterior, polished buff painted with red line designs. Smooth, unpainted buff interior. Medium temper. f, Black core with buff margins. Medium temper. Polished buff interior decorated with painted red vertical lines. Lip smooth and painted red. Ex- terior slightly rough. g, Smooth brown interior. Combed exterior, brown blackened with carbon. ano ot > ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 281 h, Slightly roughened buff exterior. Red painted lip and red vertical lines on polished buff interior. Fine temper. 0.7 em. thick. 1, Wide black core and buff margins. Fine temper. Polished buff interior. Exterior rough and carbonized. Red lip. PLATE 33 a, Brown carbonized. Medium temper. Polished interior. Smooth exterior pitted by erosion. See figure 21, 7. b, Polished dark buff interior and exterior. Medium temper. See figure 21, d. c, Fragment of handle, frying pan incensario. Black core, buff margins. Fine temper. Well-polished buff exterior with one red transverse line. Red paint along edges. Under side, smooth buff. 1.5 cm. thick. d, Concave vessel support, beveled supporting edge roughened. Smooth buff with red paint on exterior. e, Polished brown interior and exterior. Medium temper. Surface eroded and carbonzied. See figure 21, 7. f, Polished buff interior and body exterior. Lip of rim painted red. Exterior of rim roughened. Medium temper. See figure 21, h. PLaTE 34 a, Wide black core, narrow buff margins. Mediumtemper. Exterior, roughened buff. Interior, smooth buff. Considerable limestone dust deposited on sur- face. Lip painted red. Vertical ridges around middle. Indentations around collar. 0.8 cm. thick. See figure 22, a. b, Dark buff. Medium temper. Carbonized exterior shows marks of smoothing implement. Interior smooth. 0.7 cm. See figure 22, e. c, Smooth dark buff interior, red painted lip. Exterior carbonized and slightly roughed. Medium temper. 0.7 cm. thick. See figure 22, b. d, Polished dark buff interior decorated with six red stripes. Redlip. Exterior badly eroded but apparently had vertical ridges around middle similar to (a). Medium temper. lcm. thick. See figures 20, e; 23. e, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted outflaring lip. 0.8 em. thick. See figure 22, k. f, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted beveled lip. Medium temper. 1.38cm. thick. See figure 22, m. g, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted beveled lip. 1.3 em. thick. See figure 20, a. PuaTE 35 Large vessels with high collars. a, Dark buff polished interior, exterior roughened. Medium temper. Lip painted red. Applique octopus design. 1.3 cm. thick. See figure 22, d. b, Dark buff polished interior. Exterior combed. Medium temper. 0.9 ecm. thick. See figure 22, f. c, Buff, exterior of collar combed. Deep groove where collar joins body. Ex- terior of body smooth. Interior and lip of vessel smooth. Collar 12.4 cm. high. See figure 22, c. d, Collar and body of vessel combed buff. Smooth zone at point where collar joins body is polished brown. Interior is buff with black firing cloud. Medium temper. 0.7 cm. e, Black core, buff margins. Medium temper. Polished brown interior. Ex- terior combed. 1 cm. thick. f, Very thick black core, narrow buff margins. Combed buff exterior. Lip and interior smooth. Lip painted red. Coarse temper. 0.8 cm. thick. 282 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 PLATE 36 Exterior of sherds shown in plate 37. a, Buff, carbonized on exterior. Deep incised groove sets off base of collar from body. Exterior shows marks of smoothing implement, such as cornhusk. b, Buff, carbonized on exterior. Curving convex collar. See plate 30, d. c, Carbonized buff ware, red lip. See figure 22, o. d, Buff interior and exterior, fine temper. See figure 20, g. e, Rough buff exterior, coarse paste. Red lip. See figure 22, j. f, Exterior rough, carbonized. See figure 20, h. g, Rough buff exterior. Red lip. h, Rough buff exterior. Deep incised groove separating collar from body. See figure 22, g. i, Rough buff exterior. Deep incised groove separating collar from body. Coarse temper. See figure 22, h. j, Rough buff exterior. Red lip. Deep incised groove separating collar from body. Coarse temper. k, Rough exterior, carbonized. Red lip. Coarse temper. See figure 22, 7. PLATE 37 Interior of sherds shown in plate 36. a, Smooth buff with beveled rim on interior. Lip painted red. b, Same as (a). c, Polished buff. d, Smooth buff, fine temper. e, Smooth buff pitted by erosion. f, Carbonized, smooth buff. g, Smooth buff with red lip and broad red vertical lines painted on interior. h, Polished buff, beveled rim. 7, Polished buff. j, Smooth buff. Red lip. k, Carbonized surface. Smooth buff, beveled rim. PLATE 38 a—d, Conch spires with circular hole in center. e, Limestone chisel. f, Red jasper polishing stone. g, Polished celt of blue slate. PLATE 39 a, Gray core and buff margins. Fine, sparsely tempered. Dusky yellowish orange (SYR6/6) interior and exterior. Smooth exterior, rough interior. Ap- plique animal figure. 0.7 cm. thick. b, Black core, buff margins. Coarse, medium tempered. Exterior, buff with splotches of orange. Fine regular combing, with band of extremely fine comb- ing extending 2.5 em. below lip. Polished orange interior with fine parallel ridges indicating use of rubbing stone. See figure 24, a. c, Dark buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Dark buff, smooth exterior and interior of neck. Everted rim. Interior of body rough. See figure 24, e. d, Buff paste, fine tempered. Exterior of body, buff blackened by carbon, rough. Rim smooth and splotched with orange. Polished orange interior. Small buff areas are interspersed with the orange. This may be thin clay wash which has fired orange. See figure 24, d. Ano 21> ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 283 e, Orange paste, medium temper. Smooth orange interior. Exterior decorated with punctate bosses. f, 90 percent brownish black core, 10 percent buff on interior and exterior. Coarse, moderate temper. Exterior combed, buff, with applique design. Interior, granular, pitted, buff. 2.2 em. thick. g, Orange paste. Very coarse, heavily tempered. Smooth orange interior and exterior. Loop handle. h, Buff, coarse moderate temper. Combed buff exterior. Granular buff interior. 1, Buff fired orange and brownish black near rim. Coarse, moderate temper. Smooth interior. Exterior, smooth area 3.5 cm. below lip. Fine combing below this area. 1.5 cm. thick. See figure 24, b. j, Buff paste, coarse, moderate temper. Smooth buff exterior and interior. Applique octopus design. k, Same as (j) except that buff exterior is roughly combed. l, Paste black, with buff on surfaces. Coarse, heavily tempered. Surface, badly eroded. Applique octopus design. PLatE 40 a, Buff paste and surfaces. Medium temper. Smooth exterior with grooved indentations outlining rim, 1.3 cm. from lip. Red paint on exterior of rim. Interior of body deeply combed or impressed. See figure 24, c. b, Same as (a). See figure 24, f. c, Brownish black core, buff surfaces. Medium temper. Smooth interior. Exterior has regular combing similar to plate 39, b, 7. See figure 24, g. d, Gray core, buff exterior and interior. Fine, sparsely tempered. Smooth buff exterior and interior. Fire cloud on interior. See figure 24, 7. e, Light buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Rough, buff interior. Polished buff exterior with bold dusky red and narrow black, parallel lines. 0.7 cm. thick. f, Buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Flakes of mica on polished buff in- terior. Rim and interior painted red. Exterior, smooth buff. g, Buff paste. Coarse, heavily tempered. Smooth orange exterior painted red. Interior eroded, granular. h, Buff paste. Medium temper. Exterior combed. Interior of rim smooth. 1, Buff paste. Mediumtemper. Smoothsurfaces. Solid vessel support or heavy handle. j, k, Gray core, buff margins. Very fine temper, micaceous particles visible on surface. Smooth buff interior and exterior. l, Buff. Fine temper. Interior smooth. Exterior rough. PuatTE 41 a-b, Female figure of Costa Rican type from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay. ce, Metate found on Cricamola River, photographed in town of Bocas del Toro. d, Metate from Bastimentos Key. PLATE 42 a, One of the midden mounds on Darkland Point. This is the mound from which comes the Boc-1 material. b, Two of four large mortars hollowed from unshaped stones on Darkland Point. 682—611—64_—_23 984 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 PLATE 43 a—b, Rings of limestone from the offshore island, Escudo de Veraguas, which was formerly a sacred place where the Guaymi made pilgrimages and held cere- monies. Engler collection. a, 8 cm. in diameter; b, 16.5 em. in diameter. c—e, Stone celts from Jungle Point. f, Limestone pestle from Jungle Point. g—n, Stone celts and celt fragments from cave site Boc-2. k is 10 cm. long. PuatTe 44 a, Head from jaguar effigy metate found in burial cave, Boc-2. b, Head from jaguar effigy metate found on Valiente peninsula. Engler coll. c, Double-bitted ax (Engler coll.) found near Almirante. This specimen is of the same material and the same size as one of two found by us in a tomb at Barriles, Chiriqui. d-e, Double-bitted axes from Barriles, Chiriquf. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 28 Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1. (For explanation ,see p. 279.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 29 4 IN. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1. (For explanation, see p. 279.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 30 es a oe 10) OM. a ee eee Tripod vessels and subglobular bowls from Bocas del Toro, site 2 (For explanation, see p. 280.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see p. 280.) 31 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 32 a el eed 10 CM. a ee Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see pp. 280-281.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 10 CM. 4 IN. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see p. 281.) 33 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 34 Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see p. 281.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE Se eT Se Large vessels with high collars from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see p. 281.) 35 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE ee OL ee 4 Ceramic ware exteriors from Bocas del Toro, site 2 (For explanation, see p. 282.) 36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 37 Interiors of sherds shown in plate 36. (For explanation, see p. 282.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 38 J CM. Nonceramic artifacts from Bocas del Toro, site 2. (For explanation, see p. 282.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 39 4 IN. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3. (For explanation, see pp. 282-283.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 40 Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3. (For explanation, see p. 283.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 41 Stone female figure from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay; stone metates from Cricamola River and Bastimentos Key. (For explanation, see p. 283.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 42 Midden mound and mortars, Darkland Point. (For explanation, see p. 283.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 43 m Stone artifacts from Escudo Island, Jungle Point, and Darkland Cave. (For explanation, see p. 284.) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 44 Jaguar heads and double-bitted axes. (For explanation, see p. 284.) SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 73 THE ARCHEOLOGY OF TABOGA, URABA, AND TABOGUILLA ISLANDS, PANAMA By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING 285 682-611—64——-24 MOMTUTTTaNY VAIMOAW EEE ¢ qgotomdsS nisiwines, Wo mooie ; AOE nitallyil rea ‘i och EY 0. tage Ienigoloqeniiak "i . GA AGARU .ADOUAT TO YOOIOMHOAA SHG AMAVIAT POVA0el ALAUDOMAT OALIAITE VOLEAN ana Wo WARTTPAM vit We SPRL ae | FR AES Fe ee | a ee ee SS | a Bee CONTENTS (Maboea Malan titted fadna sm, of bilee Feces vente ote af ile Bt ak a LILES Go 4; ee |S anes ea Oe eae een Oe RSE eA FTN Ba » DC en Tene reli oneteme| ovonstew ys cot6 (N=) oy 2) | ORM aaa oe aree wey Uo ee a ay Caner Icy eu Wee GG erpearunh Ca 5 oh a ee EY rye AIS ie Np Be Pe al ECOL Mein s cb 2! Wy etait Gaara OMe Ue en ONO os ae een eer [SY ofr tie SAS AER es ode ged Meee bos PbS LS Oo St, Severe Mee ee eS Le Om Bnei ORO eel we TRAN COR Sanaa aa Ne 9 Wis IEEE ies WR Aes A ORNs! ene, Bt Speen We Teele =: 5 a open mies, ere 11 | ears ud Mner eects opera SEs ene Sane Seam Ato DOS Ae =.) dl el ae at ee eh ety Bah Bie te BOR Og crSRU ESET \0 Sean enaeiee miele ROY LESS TTY ry 2M Aes OS ura ees We ene eens Oa er one Tabopuilla islands 249. - sh Vette Ps yeh ba fice wpe ae ak Papozuila—1 and: Paboguilla-24v 232) oe. pee ee hee ee ee eet Ceramics: < 25.4 2 eh yond lV hea ASB Ag 2 tty Mimigeaisirns © = Sbypea sh a oop py S gt og Sh he Bees ee ed Ne, at indented! a. 2h os Se aii D ere Oia ee eet ed a en Applique:.c220 ts Be FAS sah. bee ogee fast hs Fhe el Ve Naya 0 leiceQeyetscs IR rec] te Peed eee ps aoe Coe Pees TO Ren See oe ge Se PabOriilla-B.. 52. = SE a nee tah sce pe ee eet lee, Beek 8 IRETETEMCeSiCILEC Sane. ee ee i Oe Oe Opes Eee ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES (All plates follow page 348) 45. Rim sherds from large vessels; Taboga-1. 46. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1. 47. Painted sherds; Taboga-1. 48. Various zoned designs; Taboga-1. 49. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1. 50. Pedestal and ring bases; Taboga-—1. 51. Taboga stonework. 52. Taboga and Taboguilla stone and shell. 53. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-—4. 54. Rim sherds; Taboga-—4. 55. Urabd urns. 56. Urabdé urns. 287 288 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 PLATES—Continued 57. Sites on Urabd and Taboguilla Islands. 58. Bold incising; Taboguilla—1. 59. Combing and incising; Taboguilla—1. 60. Incised ware; Taboguilla—1. 61. Various rim decorations; Taboguilla-—1. 62. Narrow line combing; Taboguilla—1. 63. Combed ware; Taboguilla—1. 64. Fragments of globular bowls decorated with combed designs; Taboguilla—1. 65. Multiple line combing; Taboguilla—1. 66. Scallop impressions; Taboguilla—1. 67. Filleting on combed surface; Taboguilla—1. 68. Filleted ware; Taboguilla—1. 69. Subglobular bowls with scallop indented filleting; Taboguilla—1. 70. Collanders; Taboguilla—1. 71. Sherds with bossed decorations; Taboguilla—1. 72. Broad flat rims of subglobular bowls; Taboguilla—1. 73. Subglobular bowls with strap handles; Taboguilla—1. 74. Rim sherds of flat shallow plates; Taboguilla—1. 75. Interior of rim sherds shown on plate 74. 76. Micellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla—1. 77. Black-on-orange-and-black outlined with white-on-orange; Taboguilla—1. 78. Black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowl sherds; Taboguilla—1. 79. Reverse of plate 78. 80. Pedestal base bowl sherds. 81. Sherds from black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowls; Taboguilla-—1. 82. Miscellaneous black-on-white-and-orange sherds; Taboguilla—1. 83. Miscellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla-1. 84. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—3 rock shelter. 85. Filleted and scallop impressed ware; Taboguilla—2. 86. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—2. 87. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—2. 88. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—1. 89. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—1. 90. Taboguilla—3; rock shelter site on Taboguilla. TEXT FIGURES PAGE 25) Rim profiles; “Vabepa-i_ = 2220 2 ees ee ae ee ee eee 300 26; Rim profiles: Taboga—l_... 2. 2222.-252232222. 12-225) eee 301 27, Rim profiles of red painted ware; Taboga-1___22_22-_ == 2-22 22 es 302 28. Rim profiles from Jarge vessels; Taboga=1-22="=_ == 222" vias eee 303 29. Rim: profiles: Tabaga—le- .. 323-2 222325 seen ek eee ae 304 50;; Rim, profiless Tabogea-l.2 =. 524-255" 50 oe eee eee 305 $1: Rim protiles; Tabora=-32.- = seu =2442 9224 eee 309 32. Small pots with miniature saucers from Urabé_____-.-------------- 311 33. Taboguilla rims proiles] 222403 soc ta oe eee eee ae ae 313 34: Tabopuslia rim profiles.) 2222. 2a se ees See eee 314 35; Restored: Taboguilla bull, ware jars 65-22-25. 5-- el 2 eee 315 36. Restored Taboguilla, buff ware jar_.-.=.-2-.2 2-222-222-2522 316 37: Restored Taboruills ceramic bowl...2-+--.-222225 2225-22 42 eee 317 Antnrop,, P| TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 289 TEXT FIGURES—Continued PAGE DoT ebeMOriOl (HEUTE OM) ee eee eo ee ee ee 318 39. Restored Taboguilla orange-and-white bowl______________________- 319 20 ivestored Laboruillayimeised jars222224 225320502452 kk seca 319 Al nestored Tabopguilla meised jar. .- =) 2.222422 eee oko 320 a hestored Caboguilla incised jars 222 2 oh a eee eee 321 25; eucstoreu abomuilla meised gar 22202. et a8 ee ee 322 Aa i aDOr tills anced BHeTOs=: See. (ssw eet mee Nee ee eo ne 323 45. Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting_____ 324 46. Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting_ ____ 325 47. Restored Taboguilla incised jar with applique crescents_____________ 326 48. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl____._.____.._......-.__-_-- 328 49. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl_______.___._._____-_____-- 329 50. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bow]___________._..._-_-___-__- 350 51. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl_______________.___.-_____- 331 52. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bow]_____..._.__......_._-_-_-- 332 53. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl__._.___.__.______-_-._-______ 333 54. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl__________.___._.-.____-__- 334 55. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl___.____._.._.._.__._-___-_-- 335 =: DEL BUR oe. eee a se suerte Oe. oe Wainer ad, } pometrta eta lion Be lei Chath pen : ORE 94h Layo Vplaictyt lien! ae Be ¥ pastry 7 . aiid we aes fain eo eM LU an st oy a yo Teh frelon al be eo fesalsat a ORL Ro ua aay Boe ha SOG Nyita kee as Resi, 9) ae ph: nl gino Gnehardotlass dst tnt viv Wise effi bata te Le an n eee ee fa viens Lapibtten ay th: ieationt, niu) ‘tact wind Tateating RE riod OBS ? he Pewee hadat ladashog atitewache’l Aaa Iwod sand lajmrhoq pile! it pre Pilid Sedat Lieb hor ah veya ..lword send latealhon alficuodall Bee CRR PORE gmat gine loygad Adhd Tateobed alliireda hd Se TAS ee te vase. SORT vied Tntaibie atliniodsa'T Bt PPS Fit BIph Area eh ald Lt quihing nltigoaes, od Can PAE Mer NGS) | An Coe apie 0, Porte ests YU gtk: y 2s gohan oe Sis Futeetenenioe jet a ye Nin aise » se + ee as -- ix 4 a" Ml ivan (pea ' 4 be ‘ ‘ i] ] j i : 1p! ‘ ial Pile ~ ‘i ii f { / J ‘ iia ¢@* bee r Lad ah wed , tee | ia td at. with) T Cros | aa a. » bial ae Ps dvightier otitis TH 4 Tyee : Lita A ADea/eaet sa, am Oh raf aideel AL Alri rales ve IN ye ame es My Peaiensii repaid bill kee jt uae 2 ee ee Ae i. 3” Par 4 avirriiltiv bynaid., yer hes oe oe es, tee BV ieecpht Tle wath dans Se a Ce ? er ; aid 7 ; ‘1 aon ie PREFACE The archeological investigations on Taboga, Uraba, and Taboguilla Islands were conducted in March and April of 1953 as part of the archeological program in Panama under the auspices of the Smith- sonian Institution and the National Geographic Society. Accompanying the expedition as photographer, and assisting gen- erally in the work throughout the entire sequence of expeditions to Panama, was Richard H. Stewart, assistant chief of the Photographic Laboratory of the National Geographic Society. We are indebted to a number of friends both in the Republic of Panama and the Canal Zone for making our work easier and more efficient. Mr. Karl Curtis, longtime resident of the Canal Zone, gave unstintingly of his time and knowledge of Panamanian archeological sites. Mr. and Mrs. Paul A. Bentz kindly allowed us to use the large basement of their home in Balboa for the storage of our specimens and asa work laboratory. Above all, we are obligated to Dr. Alejandro Méndez, director of the Museo Nacional de Panama, for his cordial cooperation and assistance during all of our archeological investiga- tions in Panama. Others, too numerous to mention, gave us assist- ance in many ways and contributed to making our stay in Panama a very pleasant one. We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the Bureau of American Ethnology, for the line drawings in this report. 291 el a ea eal 7 oe ¥ Y 1 eg ee 4 i a ; . a “ 7? finn ‘ ad B als = iva oa, de Mt a ae tet yf , ., ; Ot J e le i: ‘, a nail oe a ' on Wi ee bias WOATIND allisraodal bie. Ade) «egodeT ao vcottenitenral lesigale ods To tong en FG00 to lingé hee dow ut baisabad “ime alt Jo aiqede-d) thao aca) fT qaliony, Rae ‘aie? giikerse40 lnneitinY edt bas vowed i -062 giitefern hia tarigamelidq. ef conibsaye ah) peri Ghenoiihagqus. to souaryne sulin 412 lvodgucyl) shqwipm } 3 wiaumentedd odd lo Wide taaeletn Quawste 1 bindenl basil u voor! wilqeresd) Lacoitei eht Wee ly tabdgeds Srit at od abasit Io atin w of batdebab peer dro foe tikes Pyow wo aniAam a one tons’) okt fiete orem occu basta) adi 14 dood onthe ita) aay ui) in sate jnideitaay'l To auhalvrous bun simi et lee ewiel od) sucofau bavolly vibsisl iF 4 luwt is hee ee To vests wate 270 ty oogiole ald 26) nodal io eoonl vod lo hayes ihuaiith nT 6) hadjavidd eqauw navedaA cy1otectodal ieee if : ' ig fattriass meet jar Amano ah LAnoinAy. casually Aad 16 soiovitn «oh vw" Paha 7 buiiasy on “esiugioadoim nue io ff! TLD oot aiews 000 TORR “isieea BU BYRD Warton Hour oo anil eee at meted of Yo tio or ) DY NNO Dae By Ww Ye ire yi it in aagehge "w) (tt 20} decd tadininiuds wwhS «Moot Ibtenw eee L ek io Aid mh. wouiwaity ant Lp “Oto! rahi hia ti whens len ine THE ARCHEOLOGY OF TABOGA, URABA, AND TABOGUILLA ISLANDS, PANAMA By Marrurw W. and Marton Stririine INTRODUCTION The islands of Taboga, Urab4, and Taboguilla lie in the Gulf of Panama some 12 miles from the Pacific entrance to the Panama Canal. All three are relatively steep mountain peaks which project above the waters of the gulf and, as a consequence, there is a minimum of level ground on them. Urab& and Taboguilla lack fresh water during the dry season, and as a result have at the present time no permanent inhabitants. Urab4 is small and rocky and has very little cultivable ground. Taboguilla is larger and has a considerable area suitable for cultivation and some springs which furnish enough water for drinking purposes for all but 2 months of the year. At the present time there are three or four small houses on Taboguilla which are occupied temporarily by families from Taboga who have plantations on the island. TABOGA ISLAND Taboga, about 2 miles in length and 1 mile in width, is the largest of the three islands and the only one with permanent habitations. There is an ample supply of water and a small but good harbor with good anchorage. It is a very attractive place and now is famed as a pleasure resort. The area of the Bay of Panama extending from Taboga to the Pearl Islands is one of the world’s finest fishing grounds, a fact no doubt exploited by the aboriginal inhabitants. In fact, the name ‘“‘Panama’’ refers to the abundance of fish. Fishing now is the principal industry of Taboga as it probably was in pre-Columbian times. Judging from the nature of the archeological sites, the aborigines made considerable use of the shellfish which occur in abundance and considerable variety. The principal species used was Aequipecten circularis Sowerby, which constitutes probably one-half of the total shell content of the midden deposits. 293 294. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 Because of the lack of suitable anchorages along the mainland of the Isthmus, and because good water was not readily available there, Taboga early became a key point for the trans-Isthmian traffic. Balboa scarcely had reached the Pacific before Taboga began a colorful history matched by few spots of equal size in the New World. The principal stream of water on Taboga flows through the only relatively level area on the island, that lying immediately back of the cove and beach. The present village occupies this area on both sides of the stream, the houses being built about as close together as possible. Since this is the only logical living site on the island, it was here also that the principal aboriginal settlement was located. Under the present village lie the remains of the old colonial Spanish town, and below that the midden deposits of the Indians. A cross section of this deposit is exposed where the ramp from the beach as- cends to the first narrow street on the village level. The church appears to be built over approximately the middle of the Indian village site. While this site would be naturally the most productive location for archeological research, it is impracticable to dig in it because of the buildings which cover it. At the present time the surface of the ground under and around the houses is littered with a mixture of Spanish and Indian sherds. Information concerning the Indians inhabiting Taboga at the time of the Conquest is almost nonexistent. Because of the early settle- ment of the island by the Spaniards and its limited area, it is probable that the bulk of the natives were killed or driven away early in the 16th century. After raiding Parita and the Azuero Peninsula in 1515, Badajoz and his surviving followers fled to Chamé and thence to Taboga Island, being the first Europeans to land there. After nursing their wounds for several weeks in the security of the island, they returned to the mainland. Beyond the fact that the island received its name from Taboga, the chief who resided there, and that the Spaniards obtained 22,000 pesos of gold from the natives, we learn nothing from the early chronicles. It is probably safe to assume, however, that Badajoz obtained the gold by force and that his visit virtually brought to an end the aboriginal occupation of the island. In 1519 Pedrarias, then Governor of Panama, after taking posses- sion of the south coast, brought his force of 400 men to Taboga, from whence he established the old City of Panama. It is to be presumed that the Spaniards already had a settlement on the island, for in November of 1524 Pizarro sailed from Taboga on his epoch-making voyage of discovery which led to the conquest of Peru. In 1545, Pedro de Hinojosa, dispatched by Pizarro to capture Panama and place it under his control, outfitted and repaired his ships Anthrop. Pap. K "No. 73] — +‘TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 295 at Taboga from whence he conducted his negotiations with the govern- ing officials on the mainland. During all of this time there is no mention of Indians on the island. In 1575 Dr. Alonso Criado de Castilla stated that “Five leagues from the City of Panama was the island of Otoque, and three leagues from Panama was the island of Taboga; both tilled and cultivated by some inhabitants of Panama who planted and harvested corn.” This would seem to indicate that the aboriginal population had been replaced in the main by mestizos and Spaniards. In 1610, in reply to queries sent out by the Spanish Crown, the following item is of interest: The districts about Panama formerly had many pueblos of Indians, but only three remained. That of Chepo was eight leagues to the east . . . . Chepo had 40 Indian inhabitants, ruled by their own governor, constable, and two mandadores. On Isla del Rey [in the Pearl Islands] to the east, 18 leagues from Panama and 6 leagues from Tierra Firma was another pueblo which usually contained 500 Indians but then only 12. The third village of natives was on Isla Taboya [Taboga] 4 leagues south of the City with but 12 inhabitants, who were very poor like those of del Rey. None of these Indians paid tribute, and all spoke the Spanish lan- guage, having entirely forgotten their own. [Anderson, 1938, p. 281.] Reference to this pathetic remnant is the last contemporary men- tion of the Taboga natives. It is certain that the Indians had no part in the hectic events that took place on and about Taboga during the next two centuries when it was a key point in the activities of the buccaneers and other freebooters who roamed the South Sea and repeatedly burned and sacked the town, which was always promptly rebuilt on the same spot beside the clear stream which here flows into the cove. In 1671, when Morgan sacked Old Panama, the Spanish refugees fled by boat to Taboga and Taboguilla. It was not long after this that Captain Searles was sent to capture the Spanish treasure ship Trinity; he captured it at Taboga. The ship was poorly equipped for defense, but Taboga was stored with “several sorts of rich wines” with which Searles’ men “plentifully debauched themselves.” By the time they had sobered up, the Trinity had escaped. Hven as late as 1819 Captain Illingsworth and his group of Chileans landed on Taboga, where they looted and burned the village. A number of early descriptions of the island have been left us by the more literate of the buccaneers. That of Capt. William Dampier, written in 1685, would serve very well to describe the Island today: The 24th day we run over to the Island Tabago. Tabago is in the Bay, and about 6 Leagues South of Panama. It is about 3 mile long, and 2 broad, a high mountainous Island. On the north side it declines with a gentle descent to the Sea. The Land by the Sea is of a black Mold and deep; but towards the top of the Mountain it is strong and dry. The North side of this Island makes a 296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191 very pleasant shew, it seems to be a Garden of Fruit inclosed with many high trees; the chiefest Fruits are Plantains and Bonano’s. They thrive very well from the foot to the middle of it; but those near the top are but small, as wanting moisture. Close by the Sea there are many Coco-Nut-Trees, which make a very pleasant sight. Within the Coco-Nut-Trees there grow many Mammet (Mamé) Trees.... The S.W. end of the island hath never been cleared, but is full of Firewood, and Trees of divers sorts. There is a very fine small Brook of fresh Water, that springs out of the side of the Mountain, and gliding through the Grove of Fruit trees, falls into the Sea onthe North side. There was a small Town standing by the Sea, with a Church at one end, but now the biggest part of it is destroyed by the Privateers. 'The buccaneers under Sawkins lay here from May 2-15, 1680.[!] There is good anchoring right against the Town, about a mile from the shoar, where you may have 16 or 18 fathom Water, soft oazy ground. ‘There is a small Island close by the N.W. end of this called Tabogilla [actually Urabdé], with a small Channel to pass between. ‘There is another woody Island about a mile on the N.E. side of Tabago, and a good Channel between them: this Island [Taboguilla] hath no Name that ever I heard. [Dampier, 1717.] It is clear from the rather abundant literature concerning Taboga, that from earliest times, together with Taboguilla and Otoque, it was the vegetable garden and fruit orchard first for Old Panama, and later to a lesser extent for the modern city. It is interesting to note the apparent changes over the centuries in the character of the crops raised. Jn 1575, the principal crop was corn. In 1685 Dampier states that the chief crop was plantains and bananas, but also mentions coconuts and mames. At the present time the principal crops are pineapples and papayas, which are grown in clearings on the steep hillsides. The pineapples of Taboga are famous for their quality, and it is local tradition that the original plantings for the Hawaiian Islands came from here. The aboriginal occupants of Taboga were probably moderately prosperous, since Badajoz looted them of a fairly substantial quantity of gold.