MMI
WN
AS
.
IS
We)
XX \
A
\N
AY
SY
RAY
SN
SA
WS
WY
»
\\
AY AS
SN
GY Z
tj
YA
tj
g
Z
Z ttn
tj
YEG,
Lizz
tty,
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
iA. S, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 191
_
ANTHROPOLOGICAL
PAPERS
Numbers 68-74
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1964
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, ne: ae Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402
rice $2.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION,
BureEAvu oF AMERICAN ErHNoLoGy,
Washington, D.C., March 31, 1963.
Str: I have the honor to submit the accompanying manuscripts,
entitled ‘‘The Prehistory of Panam4 Viejo,” by Leo P. Biese; ‘“The
Language of Santa Ana Pueblo,” by Irvine Davis; “Observations on
Certain Ancient Tribes of the Northern Appalachian Province,”
by Bernard G. Hoffman; “El Limén, an Early Tomb Site in Coclé
Province, Panama,” by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling; “‘Archeo-
logical Notes on Almirante Bay, Bocas del Toro, Panama,” by
Matthew W. and Marion Stirling; ‘‘The Archeology of Taboga,
Urab4, and Taboguilla Islands, Panama,” by Matthew W. and
Marion Stirling; “Iroquois Masks and Maskmaking at Onondaga,”
by Jean Hendry, and to recommend that they be published as a
bulletin of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
Very respectfully yours,
Frank H. H. Roserrts, Jr.,
Director.
Dr. LEONARD CARMICHAEL,
Secretary, Smithsonian Institution.
ae
ee
Zain t iSONI4®
NOV 3 0 1964
LIBRARY
CONTENTS
No. 68. The Prehistory of Panam4 Viejo, by Leo P. Biese_________-_---
No. 69. The Language of Santa Ana Pueblo, by Irvine Davis_____-_----
No. 70. Observations on Certain Ancient Tribes of the Northern Appala-
ehian Province, by Bernard G. Hoffman. —._....=..-2..---<.
No. 71. El Limén, an Early Tomb Site in Coclé Province, Panama, by
Matthew W./and Marion Stirlng=. 122-2282
No. 72. Archeological Notes on Almirante Bay, Bocas del Toro, Panama,
by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling... 2-50-22 -2-.-
No. 73. The Archeology of Taboga, Urab4, and Taboguilla Islands,
Panama, by Matthew W. and Marion Stirling-._...________-_-
No. 74. Iroquois Masks and Maskmaking at Onondaga, by Jean Hendry-_-
eT MAT ZOO
-
ii Jj tet ot «
ee! p |
Cotter) and. at irae
reel 2
ao cpoipaml aff
oie ye
> oy SOS ov ae ¥
7
’ * fiver nas
— 5
72 aed Ww
WOE
. atenlawtls Fs
o
wt
vi
i ,
wietlw'
mh SQ: 6) ore
oe ftw AA le.
« -_ hy
Ao Ny :
v ®
= q
] aon, 7
Panama Viejo. Upper, Paneled urn cover; lower, side view. Approximately 4% natural
size. Courtesy Dr. Russell H. Mitchell.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 68
THE PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO
By LEO P. BIESE
682—611— 64 2
Preface. — ==
Introduction_
Historical accounts of Old Panama
Descript
Indian settlement of Malambo
he sites 2. ==
Description
Former investigations
Method
Burial practices
Burial urns
Burial offerings
Funerary votive ware
Stonework___
Ceramics -- --
Nature of the sample
Size
Red ware
Brown ware
Painted wares
Rimsherds
Decorative techniques
Design motifs
Ant
Incising
Surface designs
Relief modeling and applique
Trade ware
Secondary use of artifacts
Spindle whorls
Miscellaneous ceramic objects
Classification
Discussion___
Geograp
Contacts and migrations
Chronology
Interpretive summary
Bibliography
CONTENTS
1ons.omOldeeanamas oa. es. year ema eee Ee er oh ee ke
Gi present idvestieations 1). 220 eis Yee! LSet ee ke ae
anG shape OL wesceleun. ot 2h ten bn 2 Bee ee he ee
WiQ@aGlOMe & ers koe ape se eee ace ee od Rh yeas ice nh OB aot
hropomorphic effigies
HICALEGUS BTU UGLOMes ee A ky ee tee UI ae ee
wee ee a on i i i ww ww we we wa = = A = a a ee eee eee mere ----
4. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
(All plates except frontispiece follow page 52)
Frontispiece.
. Sacrifice burial.
. Serpent burial urn.
. Serpent burial urn.
. Painted urn and panel from incised monkey urn.
Votive ware double turtle-monkey effigy.
Votive ware double bird effigy.
. Miscellaneous votive ware.
. Miscellaneous brown ware.
. Stone artifacts.
. Red ware vessels.
. Painted wares.
. Lizard effigy vessel.
. Incised relief brown ware.
. Incised relief brown ware.
. Coclé-type red line ware and humpback effigy jar.
. Incised relief brown ware.
. Incised relief brown ware.
. Incised relief brown ware.
. Rim sherds.
. Rim sherds.
21. Miscellaneous polychrome and paneled red ware.
22. Spindle whorls.
23. Miscellaneous ceramic objects.
24, Artifacts from Venado Beach site.
25. Artifacts from Madden Lake site.
|
SHAN OWPWNHE SO OND Orb db
TEXT FIGURES
1. Design index of black-on-white paneled burial urn covers_-_--_------
2, Raised serpent desi¢n from burial urn. 22-2 eee ee
oe Incisedsbrown: Wane. oss eee a ee eee
AS Incised brown warespedestalicups=——- 2-4 2 a eee
pe lake dastone weaponepOints soos 5 na Sa eee
Gt "Stone Cclig.ss nat 2 ort 2 OSL a eee
Pe -SbORCCOlUS a4 ate a eases eas one eee eee
So EMEC WVAIRO rt a 9 bea re ne Ae tn ee, CS
G. Redawate 22222523 2sur re sotto ERO 8 Ue ee, ee
hO: “Vainbed Wares) > <2 seus ere ott it Ro ee
Bee Form pronles :& meets oo Ae ea a a Oe oe
i. Detailotlivard emery rien 2 bso ee Re Ee ee
3: Poly chromeemicy | ape. sss Sees ee SE See Saas
E.. Polychrome €fity gar ss 222 o-s2seceeusee Seo aes ANE
to. . Brown ware wWhistles=~0045 Son a oo ae ee ee nes es oo eee
MAPS
1. Historical map of Panamé4 Viejo (Old Panama) (Facing)______------
2. Wie OF Ge -Bit@s sscns<2 2 ese eoh eb beet es ee ee
3. Distribution-of-cultural traitsess-22322ss22ssssessesceson572eee
PREFACE
The nature of the countryside surrounding Panama Viejo has been
changed radically by industrialization. Originally it was a broad and
grassy plain surrounded by multiple low hills and fronted by the sea.
The climate was milder and always had less rainfall than the Atlantic
side of the Isthmus. Food was easily obtainable the year round from
the abundant deer, peccary and other small game, and easily caught
fish of the gulf. Numerous shell heaps of prehistoric sites bordering
the gulf attest to the importance of mussels and clams in the native
diet. Fresh water was available from many nearby streams although
the Rio Abajo itself was foul and contaminated by salt water at high
tide. As a dwelling site it suffered from the 20-foot high tides of the
gulf which twice daily left half a mile of mud flat and rotting organic
matter exposed. Additionally, the evil surrounding mangrove swamps
served as a breeding place for mosquitoes and other noxious insects.
It afforded, however, adequate conditions for the support of life and
the establishment of a sedentary culture which maintained peace
through trade or tribute and did not require a militarily defensible
position.
I wish to thank especially Dr. Alejandro Méndez and the Museo
Nacional de Panama for their support and encouragement, and for
the loan of the Museum’s Panama Viejo collection for study and
photography. To no lesser extent do I thank the landowner, Sr.
Enrique LeFevre, for permission to collect from this site. Thanks
are also especially due Dr. Russell H. Mitchell for permission to use
the material illustrated in the frontispiece and plates 10, 24, 6, and 25,
as well as for his encouragement and helpful advice based on long
experience in the Isthmian area. Dr. Mitchell also provided much
of the valuable reference material. I also wish to thank Sr. Dan
Sander for the material used for plate 24; the Canal Zone Library
for permission to use the historical map (map 1); and the “Panama
Archaeologist” for permission to reprint the spindle whorl figures
(pl. 22). Mr Gerald A. Doyle, Jr., prepared the site map; my wife,
Lucinda T. Biese, did the ink drawings; and I took the photographs.
Special thanks are due to my wife for suffering through innumer-
able mosquito-ridden field trips, sherd-sorting periods, and manu-
script revisions.
oe. Bs,
Panama Canal Zone.
1961.
THE PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO
By Leo P. Brrsz
INTRODUCTION
Panama Viejo is the name I have applied to a combined residence
and burial site situated adjacent to the well-known Spanish ruins of
the same name approximately 6 miles northeast of the present
Panama City.
_ The Spanish ruins (map 1) occupy an area approximately 1 mile
long by % mile wide with the long axis parallel to, and fronting on,
the Pacific Ocean at the Gulf of Panama. To the northeast of the
ruins are several acres of mangrove swamp containing a few isolated
shacks. On the east is the old port, now a semidry mangrove swamp.
Directly south is the Bay of Panama. Traveling southwest from the
ruins one passes through an area of several acres, sparsely populated
by settlements of ramshackle houses, which is followed by the suburb
of San Francisco de Calete and modern Panama City. The northern-
most portion of the ruins is delimited by the Rio Abajo over which
passes the Punta Del Rey (King’s Bridge) and the beginning of the
Portobelo Trail. Farther north and northwest lies the large modern
cemetery of Parque LeFevre. The archeological site herein discussed
lies on the property of Sr. Enrique LeFevre, at the back of the ruins
proper, in an angle formed by Diagonal 10 (a modern roadway which
bisects the ruins) and the Rio Abajo and bordered by the cemetery
(map 2). It first was discovered in 1958 during grading operations
preparatory to the expansion of the cemetery.
HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF OLD PANAMA
There is a great wealth of descriptive source material available to
the interested reader on the later history of ‘‘Old Panama.”” Because
of its position of importance in the development of the New World,
many eyewitness accounts have been preserved and their value in-
creased by lengthy modern English summaries. In order to establish
the presence of a historical Indian village on the excavation site,
however, it will be sufficient to reconstruct only the story of Old
Panama’s founding and early years.
7
8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Under the Emperor Ferdinand of Spain, Antigua was established
as the first stronghold on the Atlantic coast of the New Continent.
In 1513 the governorship of the eastern half of Panama was given to
Pedro Arias de Avila (Pedrarias the Cruel) under whom Captains
Diego de Albites and Antonio Tello de Guzman were sent forth,
toward Balboa’s newly discovered ‘‘South Sea,’ to obtain gold and to
establish a string of outposts for possible settlement. In the latter
months of 1515, the captains arrived at the Pacific coast near a small
Indian village which the local inhabitants called “Panama.” The
name is generally accepted now to mean “Place of Many Fishes,”’
but at least one chronicler, Hererra, states that the name referred to
the huge local trees which the natives termed ‘‘Panamas.”
Two years later, Licentiate Gaspar de Espinosa had been appointed
to replace the beheaded Vasco Nuifiez de Balboa in the work of explor-
ing the Pacific coast. The expedition of Espinosa camped at this
same Indian village while awaiting the return of Governor Pedrarias
from a pillaging trip to the Pearl Islands and Taboga Island in the
Gulf of Panama.
It is possible that this village was in the vicinity of the present
Venado Beach, although the exact site is not known. The actual city
was founded on a site a few miles farther east where the land was
firmer and afforded better grazing for the cattle. There is no record
of any Indian inhabitants at this latter location. In 1519, Pedrarias
officially founded the city of Panam4 with characteristic pomp and
ceremony, and in 1521 he was granted a charter and coat of arms.
Thereafter, the story is first one of slow development and then of
rapid growth after the conquest of Peru by Pizarro. A transcon-
tinental trail was constructed from the city of Portobelo and Nombre
de Dios over which the gold of Panama and Peru was transported
for shipment to Spain. For the next century or so the story wanes
and finally closes with the destruction of the city in 1671 by the
buccaneer Sir Henry Morgan.
DESCRIPTIONS OF OLD PANAMA
The city had small beginnings and was relatively stable for the
first 75 years. The first extant report is provided by the historian
Oviedo, who visited the site in 1529, after 10 years of its existence,
and stated that it was composed of 75 shacks which ‘‘were narrow and
long, and sometimes the tide will wash right into their homes. To
the North [the archeological site] was an invironment of mud and
swamps, which caused the lack of sanitation.” ?
Twelve years later, Jeronime (Girolamo) Benzoni, an Italian his-
torian, remarked that there were 112 wooden houses and calculated
1 Oviedo y Valdes: La historia general de las Indias, Seville, 1535 (in Sosa, 1955).
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 9
about 4,000 people, including the much more numerous Indians
and African slaves (Sosa, 1955, p. 29). It may be mentioned here that
the expansion of the city to its present ruined outlines and establish-
ment of the permanent stone structures dates from a much later
period, at least the early 17th century.
Carles (1960), in compiling various sources, says that the city had
two important disadvantages. The first was the rather poor harbor
which, because of high tides, made it necessary to anchor ships at some
distance. Secondly, the water supply, except for a few brackish
wells, was a half league distant at the Lavenderas (now Juan Dias)
and was itself frequently dry. Because of these disadvantages, in
1534 a warrant was issued by Queen Juana (Joanna) ordering the city
to change its location. However, this warrant was overthrown by the
inhabitants because of the consequent loss of property and the abun-
dant food supply from nearby mussel spawning grounds. From later
sources we know that this place was an important food source for the
prehistoric Indians as well.
INDIAN SETTLEMENT OF MALAMBO
It is from this point that confusion begins about the actual details
of the city. The controversy centers about the location of the
historical settlements of ‘‘Malambo” (Indian) and ‘‘Pererdevidas”’
(Negro). It is of importance because Malambo has been variously
placed directly within the boundaries of our present archeological
report as well as across the road and consequently out of the im-
mediate area. The only authentic map is that made by the engineer
Roda in 1609 and reproduced by Sosa (1955) from the original in the
Council of the Indies. This map shows only swamp in the site area
with no mention of fringe settlements. A detailed description sent
to Spain at this time does not mention the settlements.
It is probable that the Spanish Archives contains, among the many
reports and letters of the time, some which specifically mention
Malambo, but these unfortunately are unavailable to me. Both
Anderson (1911) and Bancroft (1882) contain translations of exten-
sive excerpts from these letters which describe accurately every street
and house over various periods of time, but neither of these authors
mentions Malambo. On the other hand, Sosa gives:
To the North the city prolonged the margins of the port, extending to the
settlements of Malambo, to the King’s Bridge and a few steps further to the rocky
road leading to Porto Bello; on the other hand, the city extended behind the
convents of San Francisco and La Merced, and with the suburbs of Pierde Vidas
it reached the Matanza. [Sosa, 1955, p. 29.]
Matanza is now called St. Cristopher’s Hill and this account would
place Malambo on the opposite side of the Portobelo Trail and out
10 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
of the area in question. Unfortunately, however, Sosa does not give
the reference from which he derived this account. Carles (1960), too,
locates Malambo to the northeast but also gives no references and
presumably took some of his material from the Sosa report.
The Canal Zone Library possesses a copy of a late 18th-century map
which is a modification of the original Roda map with additions of
the later structures. It is used herein, with permission, as map 1,
as it affords a good view of the entire site. It places Malambo on
the other side of the trail and marks the present area of investigation
as “dense tropical jungle, quagmires and swamp.” Unfortunately,
the name of the map’s maker is obscured and no further references
are available. Quite possibly the references of Sosa and, later, Carles,
were to this map. Much later Shafroth prepared a map, which is
also in the Canal Zone Library and forms a portion of his book (Sha-
froth, 1953), describing Malambo as being directly over the areas
of investigation. He gives no reference for this location and, in
addition, places the Rio Gallinero under the King’s Bridge and the Rio
Algarrobo to the far west, whereas Sosa and Carles interchange these
names.
At least one investigator of this site (Smith, 1960) suggests the
remains belong to those Indians present at the site before the first
Spanish occupation. Definite information will not be available with-
out radiocarbon dates or at least stratigraphic links with adjacent
cultures, but, as will be seen from the discussion to follow, the ceramic
relationship to other finds in Panama even at this early stage of knowl-
edge would tend to indicate a tentative date of at least 400 years
prior to the first Spanish settlement. It is my contention that this
archeological site represents a new culture to be reported from Panama
and that it existed in the period immediately preceding the Coclé
polychrome period. The site was abandoned, reclaimed by tropical
jungle until the period of Spanish occupation, again “‘lost,’”’ and only
rediscovered during the leveling operations in 1958.
THE SITE
(Map 2)
DESCRIPTION
The area investigated measured approximately 500X1,000 yards.
This portion was discovered when preparations were made to expand
the adjacent cemetery and the earth was cleared of growth by means of
heavy earth-moving machinery. During the leveling operations,
multiple burial urns were torn through and redistributed across the
surface. The land is a densely overgrown tropical semiswamp which
remains fairly dry during the months of December through May but,
11
o
PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 68]
‘aus aY1 Jo defj—'z avy
BEE)
SNINY OF3IA WWYNYd
Sey lap spongy ;
ths 7 c Ae ti
(suiny )
aso wes ap yuauog (3
Realy Suyait
suieway 113M
3 asnoy yI11g
dweng 7
Wd ia, TY
sual jays &3
syejing vadg spo
sjeiing win Q
Payeaeaxy jou sjeling xX
HSM Ug
qnasa17
JUAIAIT ANOUWd
682-611—64——_4
12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
because of poor drainage, has a great deal of standing water during
the rainy season. The surrounding area, from which the site is isolated
by a series of low hills, is an essentially level plain 2 miles wide.
St. Cristopher’s Hill is a hillock within the area about 2,000 yards to
the west. It is a solitary outcrop now somewhat lower than in Spanish
times as a result of erosion and the erection of several structures on
its summit. Isolated sherds are scattered throughout the region as
far as the hill, and it is possible that diffuse occupation may have
occurred at least to this point. The region is private land and was
not investigated. The area north of the site also contains scattered
sherds for another 500 yards on the opposite side of the Rio Abajo.
In the latter portion there is a higher concentration of Spanish rubbish
and the remains of a large colonial pottery kiln. This portion also
has been cleared and from surface surveys apparently is not a part of
the major site.
The soil is composed of approximately 6 feet (ranging from 4 to 8)
of a brown sandy clay which affords somewhat better drainage and
ceramic preservation than might be expected. There are isolated
lenses of higher sand content averaging 1 foot in thickness. The
strata are underlain throughout by a calcareous shell conglomerate
known as coquina. Except for isolated burial pits partially excavated
in the coquina or its natural depressions at Venado Beach, this is a
culturally sterile layer present at approximately the same depth
throughout the entire Pacific littoral of the Gulf of Panama. A
significant difference is that areas closer to the sea reflect the geo-
chronological changes in shoreline by a series of differing shell and
sand layers. Such layering is absent at this site. There is presently
a deep brown-black homogeneous humus topsoil of approximately 1-
foot thickness in the burial area. It is impossible to assess accurately
the degree of soil disturbance, but a general inspection of the site
indicates that an average of 3 feet was removed and pushed to one
side for partial construction of a temporary road. The southern
portion of the site has less topsoil and in some places the underlying
sandy clay is exposed.
In addition to the clearing operations, daily exposure of the land to
heavy tropical rains throughout two rainy seasons has further eroded
the land. Many of the sherds and at least two urns were exposed as
a result. In poor runoff areas, however, the heavy rains succeeded in
pooling an additional few inches of topsoil and obscuring surface
finds.
FORMER INVESTIGATIONS
The site was partially investigated in 1960, with surface collections
and several test pits, under the joint efforts of the Museo Nacional de
Panama and an Air Force employee, H. Morgan Smith. The material
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 13
recovered is presently in the possession of Mr. Smith at Albrook Field,
Canal Zone, and has not been published. Since its discovery, the
site has unfortunately been subjected to the daily raids of children
and an occasional local citizen. While these raids have been confined
to the immediate subsurface reachable with a machete, at least 5
burials have been demolished in my presence by upward of 15 children
at atime. Asa result, undoubtedly many whole vessels of the utility
class have been lost for future study. In addition to the material
presented here, I have located eight vessels which were purchased
from local scavengers, in collections among Panama residents and
Canal Zone personnel. As these vessels were all of the simplest kind
represented by other material in the collection, they were not included
in this report.
METHOD OF PRESENT INVESTIGATION
Soil disturbance and lack of time while the site was being prepared
for expansion of the cemetery precluded extensive trenching. The
method, then, consisted of the following program:
Burials —Excavation of undisturbed burials exposed on the surface or found
by probing the immediate subsurface. Testing pits which yielded burials are
recorded as such rather than as pits. Dense accumulations of urn fragments
and skeletal material uninvestigated because of their derangement are indicated on
the map.
Shell lenses:—Two lenses indicated on the map were cleared completely to the
sterile coquina, yielding three burials discussed below.
Surface collecttons.—All artifacts with the exception of plain red ware sherds
and burial urn fragments were collected for later analysis as described under the
section on ceramics.
Test pits—Five pits measuring 1 meter square and 1 meter deep were
placed about the periphery in an attempt to determine the limits of the cemetery
and heavy artifact concentrations.
Purchases.—All of the whole vessels mentioned were purchased from children
at the site; thus only an approximate location is known, i.e., sector of the burial
area. In addition, several more elaborate vessels are shown from other collections.
Pertinent material has been included from the large collection of
the Museo Nacional de Panam4. These artifacts are present without
context and either were purchased or brought to the museum during
the active seasons.
Sporadic finds have led to the reasonable assumption that the site
proper actually extends considerably farther to the north and west,
but these adjacent areas presently are closed to investigations. There
is evidence of probable discontinuous occupation as far as the present
day Vina del Mar and San Francisco de Calete suburbs, where similar
utility vessels have been discovered during excavations for house
foundations. Map 2 shows only the extent of the present in-
vestigation.
14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
BURIAL PRACTICES
The widespread surface derangement made it impossible to define
a precise plan of either the concentration or configuration of burials.
The entire west end of the site literally was paved with sherds from
undecorated urns which had been crushed by the earth-moving
machinery. From this extensive litter of bone and urn fragments it
could be seen that the western sector was primarily a burial area
containing a slight admixture of living debris. The eastern sector
was a dwelling site containing only sporadic burials. The distribu-
tion did not change gradually, but rather there appeared to be a
sharp demarcation between cemetery and residence areas. Test
pits established the size of the cemetery to be about 100 X 200 yards.
Distribution of fragments further suggested a maximum of 100 burials
in the concentrated area; probably considerably fewer. There well
may be many more isolated burials in the peripheral area and outside
the clearing, but this would appear to be a rather small cemetery in
comparison with the usual Panama site.
Burials were of two major types: open burial in a simple trench
or interment in urns.
Within this cemetery, burials were mainly those of the urn type.
Only six open burials were identified with any degree of certainty.
The large number of intact utility ware vessels 2-4 feet under the
present surface of this area, would seem to indicate the sites of other
open burials lacking skeletal remains because of climatic conditions.
Almost all the urns were located at approximately the same level
but, by random shallow trenching between the smashed urns, several
were found undisturbed in situ. Some of these were almost exposed
after the rains and were only a few inches under the present surface.
In each case they were within 3 feet of the new surface, representing
the deepest ‘“‘average depth” of these urns and thus escaping the
grading operations. All, however, were badly pressure broken and
squashed to less than half of their original height. The condition of
many fragments with rounded smooth breaks suggested breakage by
earth pressure long before the present clearing operations.
Surface or subsurface grave indications in the form of soil markings
usually were absent. Red clay pockets were discovered in the area;
in one case surrounding a plain urn, in another, surrounding an open
burial. Five others were investigated and found to disappear after
1-2 feet; these may have been open burials without offerings in which
the skeletal fragments had disappeared completely. Soil underneath
the red clay pockets was trenched down to the coquina, as were several
test pits. No deeper burials, such as those of Venado Beach (Lothrop,
1954) were found.
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 15
Skeletal preservation was erratic, but in general exceedingly poor.
A single section of femur might be well preserved, hard, and dense,
while fragments a few feet away were little more than dust and could
not be cleaned. Most of the harder fragments were in areas of high
shell content, while bone material in the urns was uniformly un-
salvageable. Tooth remains followed the general pattern of poor
preservation and indicate a considerable antemortum wear of grinding
surfaces, but they were not otherwise diagnostic.
Four open burials were found undisturbed. All skeletons were
fully extended, face up, and oriented north-south. All were adults;
three male and one unidentified. No flexed or secondary burials
were found. None of the open burials were in clear association with
funerary offerings. In the absence of distinctive soil markings there
was no indication of the exact size or shape of the orginal graves.
The most remarkable burials, both in preservation and attitude,
were two parallel skeletons found in a shell lens. Both of these
demonstrated the wide-open mouth and had the head in hyper-
extension with the occiput touching the cervical spine (pl. 1). Pres-
ervation did not allow demonstration of a possible cervical fracture.
Six additional open burials were present in wide random distribution as
indicated by surface collections of skeletal fragments without urn
sherds. None of these were identifiable as to sex or orientation,
but all were adults.
BURIAL URNS
Almost all of the urns are plain; only two complete ones were
recovered, both with raised designs. One incomplete set of sherds
from a painted urn was also found. A large number of decorated
fragments, however, indicated this type of urn to be by no means
rare. The typical urn is globular with a rounded bottom. On the
average they measure 50 cm. in height and 60 cm. in maximum
diameter with a 30-cm. opening. The inflection point is about half-
way up the vessel.
The urns are constructed of well-fired, coarse, granular clay tem-
pered with coarse grit. In some cases this is a sand containing
microscopic bits of silica and bearing minute gold particles which are
visible under 10 magnification. The sherds are very strong and
difficult to break by hand. The paste color is a medium brown with
mottled black-to-green areas indicating irregular firing. There is
often a reddish brown smooth surface exactly like that on the smaller
utility vessels. Only the thicker areas show a central underfired zone.
Thickness is greatest at the bottom (1.2 cm.) but is maintained fairly
regularly up the vessel walls well above the inflection point. At the
lip, thickness is approximately 0.7 cm. All lips have a plain, smooth
16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
taper without evidence of secondary elaboration. Dry weight of the
urns often runs as much as 30 pounds. There are no lugs or handles.
There was insufficient evidence to corroborate prior burning of the
bones, but the size of the vessel mouths would favor secondary burial.
LIDS
Several urns were capped with large fragments of other broken
vessels but most were covered by shallow bowls with a flaring rim.
These are generally about 40 cm. in diameter, 15 cm. in depth, and
modeled of the same paste as the urns. Like the urns, they frequently
were plain and given a red to orange-brown smooth slip. Unlike
the urns, however, the lids were of thinner construction and hence
somewhat better fired. A typical lid is shown (reconstructed) in
plate 3. At first they might seem to be utilitarian basins, but their
close fit, exact size, and absence from other parts of the site make it
probable that they were constructed specifically for this purpose.
Fragments indicate that perhaps from 5-10 percent of the lids
bore a white rim with overpainting of black geometric designs, con-
trasting sharply with the red-brown slip. A particularly good example
is shown as the frontispiece. Several of the designs are shown in
figure 1. The black-on-white coloration has been found on the inside
and outside rims, but never on both rims on the same vessel. The
inner rim is more commonly painted. In no case did the design
extend onto the slipped surface of the vessel proper. Hence it is
not a true polychrome since the design itself is in black on white
bichrome. It is termed herein a “‘black-on-white-rimmed red ware”
and may be stylistically related to the paneled red ware of Coclé.
This coloration has not been found on vessels other than burial urn
lids and represents not only the only painted ware found in any
quantity on the site, but the only one which could be considered to
be distinctive.
DECORATED URNS
One decorated urn was recovered with a raised serpent design on
opposite sides of the vessel mouth. The head is applique, the re-
mainder “raised.”’ It is shown in situ in plate 2, and reconstructed
in plate 3. A schematic drawing of the serpent itself is given in
figure 2. This design is unusual both in size and in style and, to
my knowledge, has not been encountered previously in Central
America, though it may be related to the serpent design of Veraguas
polychrome. It appears to be a stylized sea creature. Sherds of
similar designs, all incomplete, are discussed under ‘‘Ceramics.’’ The
vessel contained a very poorly preserved fragmentary adult skeleton
and a single plain plate of utility ware as described below, and it was
Anthrop..F2P. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 17
SA | a ||
|
a) ae)
a) Oh
Figure 1.—Design index of black-on-white paneled burial urn covers.
closed with a typical undecorated lid. Sherd collections of similar
fragments indicate other urns of the same type were present but rare.
A further burial vessel was uncovered bearing a striking double
lizard design in raised red ware (pl. 12 and fig. 12). This particular
ware is typical of the site and will be discussed in greater detail
below. In size and shape the vessel was thought to represent second-
ary use of a cracked water- or grain-storage jar for burial. It con-
tained a poorly preserved infant skeleton but no offerings, and it
18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
&
ie
c—- EDDY Se EDDY .
py, [ABS JES
yeh S/F TV LG JFf ZH.
Z A/F NX SNE INN XB
=\ = 5 “\ 3 \= s/A\ 2 “\FX
Z\ 3} 2 AZ“ sS/A fF AZ
Zz VAL BRAG JR] AB
{Z\ 3 SAE AZ‘ BYE AYA:
é TENE AZ JS |? Ae
BRAG yur JAH A WU Ja? \Z
> AY NDAQIEAY 5
yy ay. ape
yy, DE
Ficure 2.—Raised serpent design from burial urn.
was capped by the upper part of an identical vessel bearing fragments
of the same double lizard design.
A third complete decorated urn recently has been acquired by the
Museo Nacional and is restored completely. This urn is of the same
approximate size as the one just described and is elaborated on
each side of the opening by a highly realistic monkey (pl. 4). Like
several of the other designs, the body of the monkey was formed by
pushing outward the soft clay from the interior of the vessel. The
limbs are elaborated further by shell stamping.
PAINTED URNS
Approximately 75 percent of an urn-size vessel bearing a red and
black on white geometric design (pl. 4) was in fragments on the
surface of the central burial area. Three other fragments, not from
the same vessel, also were found on the surface. There was no
associated skeletal material, so the use of the vessel is only inferred
from location and size. Again, this is a black-bordered red on white
ware and not a true polychrome in the sense of having three or more
colors as a primary design element. This type of design was not
found on any other vessel, but similar designs are known from ca-
rafes and small bowls from Coclé Province. Simple bichrome geo-
metric patterns of this type are common throughout the Americas.
The documentation of urn burials in southern Central America
is especially important since this is considered to be primarily a
later South American trait which may be an indicator of counter-
migration. On the other hand, this burial custom is well known from
the Southern United States, Mexico, and as far south as Nicaragua.
From the latter there is a gap in the existence of the trait until La
Gloria on the Atlantic coast of Colombia, near the Panama border
(Linné, 1929). The urns recovered from Ancon Hill and presently
in the Canal Zone museum previously were widely known but un-
documented. Similar urns were also reported from Venado Beach
Anthrop..; 22. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 19
(Lothrop, 1954) and the custom is known throughout the Madden
Lake area. I have found burial urns on the Azuero Peninsula con-
taining typical El Hatillo polychrome and Veraguas-style tumbaga
eagle pendants.
With future location of urn burials from southern Central America,
particularly Costa Rica, and better age estimates, we well may be
able to trace direct southward migrations from the cultures to the
north.
BURIAL OFFERINGS
There is a general paucity of funerary offerings at this site. Most
of the urns were devoid of pottery, and goldwork conspicuously is
absent. Some of the urns contained simple utilitarian pottery,
unornamented plates, and small to medium-sized red ware pots.
Of these, three plates, two wide-mouthed bowls, and three narrow-
mouthed pots were recovered from urns. In each case they were
the only vessel in a given urn. Only 8 out of 20 definable urns con-
tained even this type of offering. Since they differ in no way from
the general refuse sherds throughout the site they are discussed
below under “Ceramics.” In only one case, grave No. 2, was a
trace of food offering in the form of 6 gm. of carbon found within a
wide-mouthed bowl. A few urns contained decorated ware. Metal-
work, coral, jade, shell, or other jewelry materials were completely
absent.
FUNERARY VOTIVE WARE
The most remarkable and locally distinctive ceramic type from this
site is the brown incised ceremonial ware: exceptionally fine elaborate
vessels which betoken a high degree of skill in pottery culture. With
the sole exception of a tribowled candelabra, these objects all were
found unassociated in the burial area. A combination of their
elaborate nature, location, and scarcity is interpreted to indicate
that they should be considered apart from the other artifacts as a
special class of votive ware restricted to funerary use. Related un-
published specimens from Venado Beach and Madden Lake are
present in the Museo Nacional and in several local private collections.
They are all light to medium chocolate brown in color with a fine-
textured paste. The temper is of fine grit. Broken edges of the
thicker (1 cm.) sections show a green to gray center zone of incom-
plete firmg. Plate 5, the most complex piece, was actually in two
separate fragments found more than a month apart and later recon-
structed. It is a double-bowled fixture resembling a candelabra
(14 cm. high and 24 cm. maximum width) and containing multiple
effigies. Each bowl represents a turtle, while each supporting arm
terminates in a humanoid face. The center junction of the arms and
20 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
base bears, on each side, a modeled head with four stylized limbs
resembling a howler monkey. The base and underside of the bowls
are elaborated with geometrical patterns in incised lines and punched
dots. The hollow base is flat on the bottom and contains small
pellets which rattle. There are five holes leading to the interior of
the base. A record of a very similar vessel found at Venado Beach
was published with a suggestion of its possible use as a type of oil
lamp (Vinton, 1951). Plate 6 shows two views of a like vessel from
the Museo Nacional collection. In this case there is only a single de-
sien, a bird. In plate 6, a, a slightly different type of bird head,
evidently from the same class of vessel, is shown to illustrate the
variation in feather elaboration.
A related “single candelabra” is shown in plate 7, a, presumably a
crustacean or insect. The Museo Nacional has a double vessel in
this pattern from Venado Beach and a third was recovered in situ
with an open extended burial in Upper Madden Lake. A miniature
candelabra is shown in plate 7, f, with further ornate brown ware
effigies depicting an alligator, bird, and turtles.
Another candelabra type object with three symmetrical radial arms
bearing recurved bowls and a central smaller bowl (8.5 cm. radial arm
length) is shown in plate 8, a. It is decorated all over with an incised
and punched geometric design and has a flat-bottomed rattle base.
This object was found in situ in plain burial urn No. 1, held in the
upraised right hand of an adult male skeleton. The bowl which was
lowermost was pulverized and is shown reconstructed in the photo-
eraph. The object evidently had been broken and repaired in ancient
times. The base was fractured cleanly and fitted together with a
white substance which had the gummy consistency of contact glue
when first removed from the damp earth, but which became quite
hard and brittle after 2 weeks’ exposure to the open air. There
was no trace of the substance around the find and it is highly unlikely
that it could have filtered into an in situ crack.
Small vessels resembling candlesticks are shown in figure 3, a.
They have a hollow annular base and incised or punched designs (3.5
and 4 cm. high).
Plate 7, f, illustrates one of a series of miniature anthropomorphic
bottles with covers in the so-called ‘‘poison-pot”’ class. These are of
finely surfaced incised brown ware and have holes drilled in both the
bottle and cover for the attachment of lids. The bottles hold about
1 fluid ounce, and though no traces of material have been identified
from the interior they are thought to have been used for arrow poisons
or some type of ritual substance. Some have an extra set of holes
for suspension. They are known from this area and from Sitio Conte.
A lid from a similar bottle of larger size is shown in plate 8, d.
PT? = PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 21
Ficure 3.—Incised brown ware.
Plate 8, b, illustrates a somewhat different effigy, not of brown ware
but of a red-orange slipped red ware similar to that discussed under
the consideration of decorated sherds below. This is a four-legged
efigy bowl, 11.5 cm. high. It is a grotesque animal of compound
type, possibly a jaguar with “spots” of reed punched design. Also
notable is the indication of five toes on each foot and prominent
(pectoral?) musculature. Realism is confused by the broken rem-
nant of a “horn” immediately above the nose.
Figure 4 shows several other vessels of the various shapes and
design patterns that occur. Incised chalices or pedestal bowls are
22 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
- |
Ficure 4.—Incised brown ware pedestal cups.
also present in larger versions, as depicted by plate 8, c (14 cm. high).
Sherds from similar vessels, having diameters ranging from 12-14
cm., are shown in figure 3,c,d. Plate 8, c, illustrates an exceptionally
fine incised sherd from a chalice-shaped vessel which would have a
diameter of 16 cm. with 7 cm. outsloping side walls. The rim elabora-
tion is similar to that found on sherds among the scattered debris at
Sitio Conte (Lothrop, 1942, fig. 345).
STONEWORK
There is a general paucity of stonework in Panam4 Viejo. Only
27 such pieces, including a large celt from a private collection, were
recovered during the course of the study. The objects were distrib-
uted throughout the site, isolated and without context, either on
Anthzon, Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 23
the surface or immediate subsurface. Many of the points were found
exposed on the surface after heavy rains. A single exception was a
small polished celt found within a pottery vessel to be described later.
POINTS
Fourteen points were recovered of which typical examples are
illustrated in figure 5, a-f. Most are made crudely of medium
yellowish brown jasper, but several are of a rather poor grade of
brown to red-brown agate. They consist of a highly irregular flake with a
few simple secondary flakes struck off to form a tang, or even a tip.
Ficure 5.—Flaked stone weapon points.
24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull 191
There is no secondary working of the blade edges. Some examples
(fig. 5, a-f) have a well-delineated tang on a short blade giving them
the appearance of a broadhead arrow point which might be mistaken
for the typical drill of this region were it not for the irregular bends of
the tang. Cores were sought but not found. ‘These points are identi-
cal to those described by Lothrop from Sitio Conte and also represent
the typical blades found at Venado Beach and in the Madden Lake
area. Unlike specimens from the latter, however, none were found of
the petrified wood which represents such a common source of material
at the lake, but which is relatively rare at Panama Viejo. Figure
5, g, is an unusual point composed of white translucent chal-
cedony with a slight yellowish tinge. It is triangular in cross section
and in profile, giving it an awkward, heavy appearance. The thick-
ness at the base is almost half the length of the entire point so that it
could not have been hafted very successfully. The under surface
has the usual irregular planes which suggest a flake struck from a
core. There is no secondary reworking except for the tang. As in
the Coclé area, there is no evidence that any of these points were
hafted to arrows, nor does their ungainly appearance suggest this.
It is more likely that they were used as points for small throwing
spears or used with wooden ‘‘throwing sticks’’ of which no archeologi-
cal evidence remains.
SCRAPERS
Only three objects were recovered which could be considered as
scrapers. Figure 5, h, shows a small, blunt object made of jasper,
similar in all respects to the points described above except that it
has no tang and the working end is rounded by secondary flaking.
It may represent a reworked point. The object shown in figure 5, 2,
is so dissimilar to the remainder of the stonework that its origin may
be seriously questioned. After rains it was found on the surface
within the central portion of the burial area and without any adjacent
urn fragments, which would indicate it was not an offering. It is
composed of a dense medium-gray and slightly glossy agate type of
material which exhibits well-delineated conchoidal fractures. It is
of a not unusual pear shape, but is unique for this area in that its
entire outline has been reworked by secondary parallel pressure
flaking of medium-sized strokes, to give it a sharp symmetrical edge
in contrast to the usual crude techniques. There is no evidence
of either use or hafting, but the general shape and very sharp point
suggest a double-faced woodworking adz.
Plate 9, a’, illustrates a large scraper of mottled orange-brown
agate. The edge was reworked with secondary chipping and the
entire piece is smoothly worn down from use. This piece is so nearly
Anthrop., Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 25
identical to those in my collection from the Hopewell North American
Indian site at Wakenda, Mo., that a photograph of the latter has been
included (pl. 9, a). This is distinguishable from the former only in
that it is composed of a very fine grade of light tan chert common to
Missouri. At the Hopewell site such objects are typical of the culture
and are believed to have been held with the flattened edge in the palm
and used as deer and buffalo hide scrapers. Many of the celts
common to Panama are found in patterns and, in many instances,
materials identical to those found. throughout the midwestern
United States.
CELTS
Ten celts were recovered from the site, and an additional specimen
was located in a private collection. They are all composed of various
grades of basaltic rhyolite, but differ greatly in shape and will be
described separately.
Figure 6, b, shows a pear-shaped celt which has been broken off at
one corner. It is crudely polished at the distal end with a smooth
wedge-shaped blade, and a proximal end of rounded cross section has
been left rough. The specimen in the private collection is identical to
the above except for its larger size of an overall 8 inches. These celts
represent the most common type reported from Sitio Conte, and
Lothrop considers the incurved sides as representative of that culture.
A common variant of this type (unillustrated) has straight sides and a
somewhat broader proximal end. Like the others, it is polished only
in the lower half. All are composed of a basalt having a beautiful
even pattern of whitish inclusions giving a “‘salt-and-pepper” appear-
ance.
The object in figure 6, a, is apparently the proximal end of an oval
celt of a basaltic syenite, smooth but unpolished evenly throughout,
and perfectly symmetrical on both longitudinal axes. Lacking the
distal blade end, it is possible that this is an unused mealing stone or
similar object.
In figure 7, a, 6, are shown medium-sized celts of gray rhyolite
completely unlike the others and unreported from Panama. They
are blunt and only roughly shaped out like the earliest hand axes of
the European Paleolithic. It has been suggested to me that these are
prepared blanks which awaited further finishing. Since little is known
of the exact stages through which these celts were prepared, no definite
hypothesis can be given. It is known, however, that the very earliest
and the very latest Stone Age cultures produced similar celts: the
earliest when grinding techniques were not developed, and the latest
when availability of metals made the refinements of technique no
longer worth the amount of labor involved. On the other hand, it
26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Ficure 6.—Stone celts.
presumably is possible that they are artificial inclusions from some
preceramic culture in the region. At any rate, definite statements
will have to wait the development of further information on Pana-
manian stonework.
Anthrop. Pap. in
"No. 68] PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 27
Ficure 7.—Stone celts.
Figure 6, e, represented in the collection by two examples, shows a
more or less standard wedge-shaped celt, polished in the lower three-
fourths. The celt in figure 6, d, is composed of a somewhat more
loosely textured basalt and has vertical edge faces so that only the
distal end is a cutting edge and the successive cross sections are
progressively larger rectangles which have very slightly bowed sides.
It has a diagonal cutting edge like some of those also found at Sitio
Conte, and is smoothly polished throughout.
The remaining two celts, of which one is illustrated (fig. 6, c), are
small, dense, dark black basaltic material, wedge-shaped and given a
high polish throughout. The cutting edges are quite sharp and with-
out evidence of use. One of these was found inside a small pottery
vessel described under ‘‘Ceramics’”’ (pl. 10, 6).
682—611—64—_5
28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
METATES
A single metate and its mano were found in the Museo Nacional
collection (pl. 9, 6). This is a three-legged type, not uncommon
farther to the west. It is of a coarse badly weathered tufa, and the
legs have been partly broken. It should be noted that in the Madden
Lake area simple oval metates are common. They are usually without
legs and consist of a shallow depression worn in the naturally shaped
irregular rock without secondary reworking. None were present at
this site.
It may be remarked again that there is a general paucity of stone-
work at Panam4 Viejo in comparison to similar sites in this region.
There were no chisels, drills, smoothers, polishing stones, or arrow-
shaft straighteners present as at Sitio Conte or Venado Beach, and
no carved stone objects are known to have been found. There were
many smooth waterworn stones distributed throughout, one weighing
approximately 10 pounds and roughly mano-shaped, but they in no
way differed from those found randomly in the creekbed nearby.
CERAMICS
NATURE OF THE SAMPLE
Because of the deranged nature of the site it was felt that accurate
sherd counts would not yield sufficient valid information to compen-
sate for the inordinate amount of time involved. In fact, a brief
testing of this method indicated it might yield completely false in-
formation unless the entire site was excavated down to sterile soil.
In places where the earth grader removed high spots and turned
around to make a new pass, there might be hundreds of burial urn
parts, while in the furrows a few feet away there would be scarcely any.
Similarly, it was evident that no stratigraphic analysis was possible.
Accordingly, only those sherds having decoration were collected from
the surface, the immediate subsurface during the investigation of
burials, and several random pits about the periphery of the site.
In the burial area, almost all the sherds were from large urns but
with a slight admixture of both decorated and undecorated portions
of smaller vessels. Presumably they were from both burial offerings
and general debris. In the residence area there were many more
sherds from smaller vessels. The sherds in both areas, exclusive of
burial urns, were predominantly (50:1) undecorated red ware.
Those that were decorated in no way differed from their counter-
parts in the other areas. Several 2-foot squares were dug to a depth
of 3 feet around the periphery of the site in order to get an idea of
its extent. They are indicated in the site diagram (map 2). In
Anthrop.,Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 29
general, sherds from these pits were very sparse, often less than five in
each hole, so they were added to the general pool.
The pooled sample consisted of 450 decorated sherds of which
339 were body sherds, 32 were rim pieces, and 79 were miscellaneous
painted sherds. These will be analyzed in detail during the dis-
cussion of their respective pottery types.
SIZE AND SHAPE OF VESSELS
Only one vessel was recovered complete, though it was severely
broken by earth pressure. The restored piece is a very large, round-
bottom, squat pot measuring 40 cm. in diameter. It is discussed in
detail below. Several of the larger sherds would seem to belong to
a vessel of approximately the same size. Modern day undecorated
examples can be seen in almost every hut in the mountains throughout
Panama, where they are used for water and grain storage or to prepare
the alcoholic ‘“‘chicha.’”’ Of the smaller sherd pieces, the majority have
so little curvature that they must certainly have come from at least
moderate-sized vessels of unknown shape; the contours are shown
with the sherd figures. The size is also attested to by identifiable
portions of incised effigies which must have occupied an area at least
the size of our intact example. It would be very interesting to know
the range of shapes and uses of these pottery types and why they
alone were given the distinctive stylistic treatment not found on
smaller vessels.
RED WARE
The general, and presumably utilitarian, pottery is a plain, un-
decorated, hard, dense vessel of medium red-brown color. It is
tempered with fine grit often bearing minute siliceous deposits. The
slip varies from red-brown to a decidedly red-orange color and is easily
washed off in water. Refiring of sherds in excess oxygen at 500° C.
for 30 minutes causes no color change, indicating a state of full
oxidation.
The most common shapes are the small globular “beanpot” with a
rounded bottom, a larger and more stable wide-mouthed bowl,
and a rather thick and heavy plate of very shallow form. ‘There is a
simple recurved rim without secondary elaboration or decoration so
that cross sections are of uniform width. Thickness averages about
0.6 cm. Typical shapes are shown in figures 8, a-—f, and 9, a, b.
Surface finish varies from a smooth to a rather roughened appear-
ance with undiagnostic tooling marks on both the interior and ex-
terior. These at least indicate the use of some type of stone or wood
object or, in some instances, corncobs to smooth the vessel surfaces
before drying. Firing is often uneven with isolated black smudges
30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
OTT ¥
we LLM
Uy
Wf Sore:
Ficure 8.—Red ware.
on surface areas. Many of the vessels show charring on the rim or
interior, indicating their contact with fire while in use. Most of the
intact examples illustrated were recovered from the burial area, and
several from inside urns. These in no way differed, however, from the
thousands of fragmentary samples found throughout the site. Red-
ware vessels were obtained both in average utility sizes of 1-2 quart
capacity and in miniature sizes identical in shape but having a capac-
ity of from 2—4 ounces.
Anthrop.,7@P. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 31
Ficure 9.—Red ware.
Several vessels with unusual shapes for the area were recovered.
They all were present, though infrequent, at Sitio Conte. Plate 10, a
(left), shows a broken-rimmed gourd effigy vessel or fluted bowl
of a somewhat finer paste and smoother finish than is usual. At
Sitio Conte they occurred in both red and in smoked wares (Lothrop,
an BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
1942; figs. 266, 271) and were considered to be primarily a late char-
acteristic. ‘They have also been found at Cupica, Colombia (Linné,
1929; fig. 53). Plate 10, a (right), shows a spouted vessel somewhat
cruder than those from Coclé. Another vessel, of coarse brown un-
slipped clay, is shown in figure 9, c. This bottom-spouted vessel also
was represented in Coclé by a single identical vessel (Lothrop, 1942;
fig. 337, a). It resembles many of the classic “baby feeders” of
Europe. A red ware pedestal plate, or frutera, 22 cm. in diameter,
is shown in figure 8, d. Plate 10, 6, shows asmall red ware beanpot with
several rows of appliqued nubbins. It was found in juxtaposition to
burial No. 5 in the shell lens and contained a small, polished, wedge-
shaped celt, described under ‘Stonework.’ This type of pot has
been described from Veraguas (Lothrop, 1950; fig. 62). A rather mas-
sive red ware tripod, differing from the usual variety in the outcurving
position of the legs, is illustrated in plate 10, c.
One small dish (fig. 9, d) had a neatly drilled center hole which was
filled with a plug of unbaked, buff clay. The rough base of this
piece suggested that some form of pedestal had been attached.
BROWN WARE
The characteristic pottery type of this site is a brown ware with
decoration applied by a variety of combinations of incising, mechanical
punching, and appliqued or modeled relief. The group includes
several related types which employ more or less the same techniques
but vary widely in color and, to a lesser extent, in the physical char-
acteristics of the paste mixture. The color is most commonly a
medium brown or red brown (5/4 and 4/4 Munsell scale), but a con-
siderable portion of the sample runs toward a redder tone (5/6) or to
darker browns and lighter red-free browns (4/2 and 6/3). Presumably
this is a characteristic of the particular paste on hand at the moment,
and the firing temperature, rather than of distinctive pottery types.
Sherds of each major color variation were broken in half and one por-
tion was refired in excess oxygen at 500° C. for 30 minutes. The
changes of color are as follows:
Munsell color Refired color.
Red 2.5 YR: 4/6 Red 2.5 YR: 4/8
Reddish brown 5.0 YR: 4/4 Red 2.5 YR: 4/8
Dark reddish brown 5.0 YR: 3/3 Yellowish red 5.0 YR: 4/6
Similarly, there is variation in the surface texture. Most of the
material is a fine-textured, fine-grit tempered paste which was
smoothed on the surface to a moderate polish, leaving no surface pits
visible to the naked eye and impervious to water. A substantial
number of sherds, however, have a more open grainy surface texture
which appears to be of the same paste material left unpolished.
Anthrop..PaP- PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 33
None of the brown wares are covered with slip. There does not appear
to be enough evidence to break this ware down into subgroups on the
basis of consistent variations.
PAINTED WARES
Black and white on red ware.—Fifty-six isolated sherds were re-
covered which fall into a group of black, white, and red simple geo-
metric designs in various color combinations. For the most part
these consist of rim pieces with concentric bands of white and black on
the edge of ared ground (pl. 11, a; fig. 10,6). The bands may be from
less than 1 cm. to more than 6 cm. in width and may be single or multi-
ple. This ware is probably related directly to the paneled urn covers.
Several variants were found. Four sherds were from white vessels
bearing alternating red and black bands, the reverse color sequence
of the above (fig. 10, e). Another four sherds (fig. 10, a, h) were of red
ware which was decorated with concentric black bands only; no white
was present. ‘Three sherds are present from the near center of plates
or shallow bowls having a white panel with black geometric designs
(fig. 10, c, i, k). Some or all of the rims may belong to this style, but
unfortunately none of sufficient extent were recovered to justify this
conclusion. The ceramic paste in both these and the rim sherds is
identical to that of the usual red ware. The red paint appears to have
been applied first as a slip, somewhat heavier than on the simple
vessels. Whites range from a pure white to a cream white and appear
to be the most labile.
All of the sherds in this group appear to be related and, by the num-
ber of them recovered, represent a possible “‘type’”’ painted ware of
this culture. Not enough sherds of the variants are present to warrant
classification at this time. None are true polychromes, since the
design proper utilizes only two colors superimposed on a self-color
background. As such, they are related to the paneled red ware of
Coclé and presumably represent cultural acquisition earlier than true
polychromes.
Red on brown.—Two sherds were recovered of the same brown
ware present throughout the site, but having a narrow red band.
Both of these are rim sherds (pl. 11,d). Their place in the pottery
classification is unknown.
RIMSHERDS
The 32 rimsherds recovered can be divided conveniently into three
groups on the basis of profiles (fig. 11).
The first group (a-l) shows a slight inward curve. Shapes are
those of plates and shallow bowls. All except one are slipped red
ware and all have some manner of plastic decoration.
34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
== lamar Kael beams Mara 2 hye ct
RED WHITE BLACK PURPLE ORANGE
Ficure 10.—Painted wares.
Group two (m—u) has vertical rims and the vessel sides may slope
outward to an inflection point before recurving inward. The shapes
are narrow, and wide-mouthed, globular vessels of medium size.
Only two are slipped; the remainder are incised brown ware. All
have more elaborate designs than the former group.
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 35
Ficure 11.—Rim profiles.
Group three (v—z’) consists of severely recurved rimsherds, some-
times flattened along the inner edge. They are of slipped red ware
and either not decorated or decorated by simple shell stamping along
the edges. They represent conventional wide-mouthed globular pots.
DECORATIVE TECHNIQUES
DESIGN MOTIFS
Segments of serpents and lizards are the most common design
motifs of the brown wares. From the sherd material, it is impossible
in most cases to distinguish between the two. A serpent from a
large burial urn is illustrated in plate 3 and figure 2._ This particular
36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
serpent appears to be a variety of sea creature; the illusion is created
mainly by the long curling “antennae.” No truly representative
creatures are known in Panama or its waters, but one is reminded of
the common yellow-bellied sea snake (Polamis platuria) which may
have been elevated by prehistoric imagination to the level of some
superstitious significance. Several sherds would appear to be of the
same pattern.
A very realistically executed lizard or iguana is illustrated in plate
12 and figure 12, representing the finest example of incised relief
ware from the site. The backward-facing position of the head appears
rather unusual for Panama and gives the whole design an appearance
reminiscent of Quetzalcoatl motifs in Mexico such as that on the
facades of Xochicalco. This is also frequently the position in which
Chinese dragons are portrayed. Lothrop (1942; figs. 43-44) illus-
trates a bird in this position from a painted Coclé plate, but there
does not seem to be any relation between the above and the serpent
or lizard motifs from Sitio Conte or Veraguas. The collection also
includes fragments of other similar designs, all of which are approxi-
mately the same size.
A nearly complete parrot was found (pl. 13, a), which, judging by
its curvature and thickness (10 mm.), originally formed a portion of
a very large urn. This is an example of the modeled-relief technique
in which the body is formed by pushing the clay outward from the
inside of the vessel so that the actual wall thickness remains un-
changed. Again, one is reminded more of Mexican motifs than of
the polychrome phases of Panama. A similarly formed monkey urn
was discussed earlier.
Ficure 12.—Detail of lizard effigy jar.
Anthrop.,Fap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 37
A water bird is shown in plate 13, b, in a much cruder, but accurate,
simple linear incising. It probably represents the white heron which
may be seen on the beach next to the site and is common through
the Panama Gulf region.
Other animal motifs are present in the ceremonial ware mentioned
in connection with burials. These are the turtle, alligator, and
monkey, and humanoid three-dimensional figures. Several portions
of such figures are present in the collection.
LOCATION
From the few restorable vessels it appears that the biological mo-
tifs usually were placed separately on opposing sides of the vessel.
In all cases the same pattern was present on both sides of the upper
half to one-third of the vessel. On some, the jar was divided into
four vertical panels by appliqued ridges into four alternating blank
and decorated vertical panels similar to the sections of an orange.
On the other hand, pots with geometrical designs appear to be filled
across the entire visible outer surface leaving only the bottom and
interior undecorated. The rims were further elaborated on the top
or either side, but the rim and body decorations are not contiguous.
There is no evidence of any zoning of decorative fields.
ANTHROPOMORPHIC EFFIGIES
Four polychrome vessels were found which have humanoid fea-
tures. They are basically similar and have in common the ridging
to indicate hair style and the painted “mask.’”’ Beyond these fea-
tures, however, they are quite dissimilar in ceramic type, paint quality
and color, and in stylistic execution. They do not appear to be the
product of a single artist, nor to have the unity of similar vessels to
the west.
Plate 15, 6, is unquestionably a typical “Coclé-type” humpback
effigy in coarse slipped red ware with white panels to indicate face
and arms. The face is elaborated by a purple mask and the arms
and breastplate are decorated with geometric black lines in the typi-
cal Sitio Conte manner, but they were too poorly preserved to photo-
graph well. The protruding mouth and nose as a single unit makes
it resemble a monkey more than a human; an interesting combina-
tion when combined with the humpback. There are small raised
breasts and no evidence of masculine structure.
In plate 21, 6, is shown a miniature vessel in which the body is
barrel-shaped without arms. This is a better grade of slipped,
polished red ware with a soft white slip over most of the body. The
decorations in red and the mask in purple are edged with black material
38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
and all are applied over the white. In paint, this resembles the Coclé
specimens, but the style is different.
Figure 13 is a very fine vessel from the Museo Nacional collection.
It is a red ware vessel with elaborate panels which relate it more to
Ficure 13.—Polychrome effigy jar (Museo Nacional).
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 39
the Azuero Peninsula than to Coclé. Both modeled hands are placed
to the mouth. The head is white slipped with a ridge to indicate the
hairline and a high conical hat decorated with alternating red and
purple stripes. There are six symmetrical body panels, redrawn
flat in the illustration. The front panel (a’) is repeated on the back
and consists of scrolls in black on the natural background. The
inner portions of the scrolls end in stylized “alligator god” heads.
The side panels (a’’) are placed over a white background and consist
of elaborate convolutions ending in alligator god heads and having
fillers of small red and purple wedges.
The vessel shown in figure 14 is made of a finer buff paste, com-
pletely slipped with a hard, polished cream-white surface. It is
Figure 14.—Polychrome effigy jar.
40 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
decorated in black, except for the red shadows under the eyes. The
manner of hair indication is similar to that above and the feet are
like those on many Veraguas buff ware effigies. The style, however,
seems completely unrelated to any Panama pottery published here-
tofore and seems more lifelike than the usual humanoid effigies,
INCISING
The main design technique consists of incising with the thumbnail
or a pointed tool in a linear fashion to form various animal drawings.
These are then elaborated with incising or punching by various
mechanical tools so as to fill in the design or further elaborate the
body outlines. Punched holes, shell marks, thumbnail marks, and
various combinations of markings made by a hollow reed have been
identified. The reed marks are in patterns of full circles, concentric
circles, circles with central dots, and half circles. Many designs are
executed with a mixture of several techniques. The frequency of
appearance of single and mixed designs is as given below and as illus-
trated by selected examples in plates 16-18:
Number of pooled decorated sherds_____.--_____---_-_---- 339
Number incised oe ee Se 328
Linear . sisters sce, V8 Pea Sse Se i es 185
Punched ..§. Pe Sei eee ee a eee eee 67
Shell... 3 2.88. 3 28} Bh OYE RS ee 38
Reed... 3. Vee ER ee BL Sek BES 13
Circle-dot\ 3. 3:2: -423_ 3.3.8.3. % £05. Be 12
Concentric Giréles’"-} 2 ere ie Pee as 10
Half circles S20... Foci BL Be 19
Fingernail) 2. Sas Seat Res Beene Ne a 5
Raised ridges along incised lines are present in some examples,
but most designs are clean and would indicate incising the “leather-
hard” rather than in wet clay, causing uneven grooves due to subse-
quent polishing.
SURFACE DESIGNS
Surface designs are shown in plates 19-20. Of the out-sloping
plates and shallow bowls, the most frequent rims are those with molded
ridges and/or one or more concentric incised rings. The ridge may
be above the ring, below it (pl. 19, a), or both above and below
(pl. 19, e). In some examples either the edge or the ridged edge
was scalloped (pl. 19, 6, d). Other designs are simple shell stamping
(pl. 20, 7) and punching or notching of the rim (pl. 20, d). They
are apparently notched in the leather-hard state.
Of the vertical, and chiefly brown-ware rims, designs consist of
geometrical patterns of alternating incised lines and punched dots
(pl. 20, a-c). In contrast to the former group, incising appears to
Anthrop. Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 41
have been done in the damp state, leaving a well-defined ridge which
can be seen in the photographs. The patterns occur all over the
external surface exclusive of the bottom and do not appear to be
organized in zones. Some designs are more elaborate incised circles
and swirls (pl. 19, g), like those on the votive ware. On others, an
applique ridge is diagonally incised in imitation of rope, or has crude
ridging and edge notching.
RELIEF MODELING AND APPLIQUE
Other plastic decorative techniques frequently employed are relief
modeling and applique. It is the former which really gives this
pottery its completely distinctive appearance and one cannot but be
impressed at the high degree of refinement in this technique. Oc-
casionally the entire animal body is raised above the vessel surface,
outlined with deep linear incising, and paneled with reed or shell
markings. In the thick, heavy sherds the modeling often is pressed
outward from the inner surface; in smaller sherds the inner surface is
smooth and flush. Relief is used also for heads alone, or portions of
heads such as jaws and the beaks of birds. Applique is used in much
the same manner where a sharper raised edge is required; most fre-
quently in the application of eyes. The term “Modeled Relief Brown
Ware’ has been applied locally to this type of pottery found on the
Venado Beach site, a term believed to have originated with Dr.
Lothrop during his excavations there. The frequencies of these
decorative techniques are as follows:
Anpligued! rm, 25 ie gmat noel fae sett ls 8
wih 19 LE) pT lade hl ranks BE ee ail Mf Bera te Pape bea 3
Appliqued aiid incised. 1__Jsyscu O24 - SUL LeL 2 US 124
Modeled and incised: d se d4 osnspe-e bel eb ebeebe- oe 35
Total plastic decorations....-.2--.---.+----+-.- 170
TRADE WARE
Seventy-six sherds were found having decorations in two or more
colors. Of these, 20 were true polychromes in red, white, black, purple
or, more rarely, orange. Several represent portions of typical
Veraguas-Coclé types both in designs and materials. Most appear to
be segments of fruteras and plates with serpent and similar motifs,
including the “coral snake rim” (fig. 10, d, f,g). Similarly, a portion of
a frutera pedestal was found. One sherd has a raised ‘nubbin”
with four supports (fig. 10, 7) decorated in red and black on a highly
polished buff ware of foreign import. This represents a type ware of
Parita and related sites on the Azuero Peninsula. A sequence of
progressive stylizations are known whereby this is shown to be a
frog effigy (Biese, 1961). This definitely is not a locally manufactured
42 BUREAU OF AMERICAN’ ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
piece and is known to occur as trade ware in both Coclé and Veraguas.
A complete widemouthed vessel (pl. 15, a@) and nine sherds are of red
designs on a white ground, identical to the Coclé redline ware.
In the absence of further material from the site, these pieces are all
considered to be trade ware brought in from the more westerly prov-
inces. Unfortunately, the lack of correlated finds in graves or in
context with incised wares makes it impossible to establish them as
contemporaneous with the other artifacts. It is of significance, how-
ever, that the redline ware is considered to be definitely a late char-
acteristic of Sitio Conte in Coclé.
Several of the red ware vessels merit individual discussion. In
plate 21, b, are shown two red ware vessels, a small dish and a spouted
vessel, both with white panels bearing black scrolls. While similar to
Coclé vessels, at least to me they appear to be imitations or copies of
the same; an impression perhaps only gained by handling the two side
by side. They are cruder, heavier, and slightly different in surface
texture than the usual Sitio Conte ware and may be of local
manufacture.
Plate 21, a, also shows a widemouthed pot and a rather massive, dense
polychrome pedestal enclosing rattles. Both of these have a coarse,
medium buff ground color with designs in red and purple edged in
black. In style and finish they do not resemble previously reported
Panama polychromes.
SECONDARY USE OF ARTIFACTS
Sufficient direct evidence for the repair and re-use of damaged
vessels often is lacking. However, the ordinary rim chipping of
vessels in use, which was later smoothed by grinding, is seen frequently.
When evidence of major repairs is found, it is an occurrence worth
detailed notice. When a vessel is used for burial it may be taken as
some evidence of a frugal or materially poor culture or, conversely,
one lacking a highly formalized burial tradition. This is in marked
contrast to many cultures in which the grave furniture is new and
constructed specifically for the purpose.
The lizard motif incised relief vessel shown in plate 12, a, was
originally recovered as burial No. 7, where it was found within a
conventional undecorated urn. This round-bottomed vessel is 40
cm. in maximum diameter by 30 cm. in maximum height, with its
inflection point located at five-eighths of the latter. It is of a medium
red-brown paste with a smooth unpolished surface. There was a
portion of an incompletely oxidized brown to dark-green identical
vessel used as a cover. The ridges, which divide the vessel into four
panels, and the crest of the lizard exactly match up with the cover
Anthrop., Pap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 43
design with a 5-10 cm. overlap all the way around. This vessel top
has a shallow flat shoulder ending in a throat only 15 cm. in diameter
around which there is evidence of a vertical rim having been present
at one time. The bottom has a 19 cm. curving fracture with 7 smooth
holes drilled along the edges. This was obviously for the placement
of ties for mending by the “‘crack-lace’’ method previously unreported
from Panama. As mentioned above, the jar contained a 20-cm.
plate and an infant burial. It appears that a utility grain- or water-
storage jar, with a not uncommon design, developed a crack and was
repaired. The vessel mouth was then widened so that the plate and
burial (or secondary burial) could be placed in it and covered with the
broken top of a similar vessel. Linné (1929) summarizes the distri-
bution of the technique and concludes it is primarily of western South
American origin with singular exceptions in Nicaragua and Costa
Rica. It is completely unknown from Mexico and Guatemala.
SPINDLE WHORLS
The 15 spindle whorls from the site (pl. 22) were treated separately
in a recent publication, to which one should refer for more detailed
information (Biese, 1961). All of the whorls were found exposed
on the surface after heavy rains, and were distributed sporadically
and without context in both residence and burial areas. They are
all made of the same red-brown to brown clays and tempering tech-
niques used for the general ceramic remains. The surface treatments
fall into two distinct groups: the coarse orange-to-red-to-brown slip
of Panamé Viejo red ware, and the unslipped, smooth brown wares.
One whorl (No. 3) was a partially smudged tan of coarse clay.
By physical characteristics, the whorls fell into three groups:
Simple——Nos. 10-11 are simple flattened balls of slipped clay bearing a center
core and representing the simplest type of spindle weight. No. 12 adds the
further refinement of a secondary smaller mass atop the first. In Nos. 1-2 this
mass is more distinctive.
Mammiform.—Nos. 5, 7, and 9 have a more pronounced upper mass of clay.
They also differ from the preceding by being composed of a smoothly polished
dark-brown clay.
Incised.—The remainder of the whorls are all similar in that they are decorated
with radial incising or punctate designs.
In the publication cited above (Biese, 1961) it was pointed out that
the weights and diameters of these whorls placed them in two groups
such that the rough approximation of their inertia gave a sevenfold
difference. It was suggested that this was evidence for a more ad-
vanced weaving technology in which either two different fibers were
spun or two different weights of fibers were made for different
purposes.
682-611—64_—6
44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
MISCELLANEOUS CERAMIC OBJECTS
A number of miscellaneous clay objects were recovered from the
site. Figure 15 shows two single note incised brown ware whistles,
both probably representing alligators. The broken tail of another
whistle, probably representing a bird, is illustrated in plate 23 with
other miscellaneous objects found at the site.
CLASSIFICATION
There is an insufficient collection of material upon which to base
a definitive classification scheme. ‘This is especially true when it is
known that related pottery is present throughout the Venado Beach-
Ficure 15.—Brown ware whistles.
Anthrep., rap. PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 45
Madden Lake areas and its accumulation will necessitate revision of
any system. Furthermore, we may well find that stratified deposits
will presage a system of classification having temporal as well as
geographical value in the determination of cultural parameters.
Nevertheless, a summary of the ceramic collection presented herein
may be given in the form of a preliminary classification. This is
intended only to be descriptive of the various broad groups of pottery
recovered and to be used as an aid for further comparisons; to divide
it immediately from the equally broad cultures previously described
from Panama.
I. PanaMA ViEJo RED WARE
II. Panamd ViEJo DEcorATED BROWN WARE
1. Incised brown ware. (Pl. 8, e.) Identical to those sherds of the
same name from Sitio Conte. The paucity of examples would
suggest it is neither native to, nor representative of, either of
these areas.
2. Geometric brown ware. Including its red-brown variants. The de-
sign is geometrical and incised with secondary elaboration by
punching and mechanical stamping with shell and reed.
3. Biometric-relief brown ware. (With red-brown variants.) The de-
signs are animal representations in bas-relief outlined by incising
and elaborated by secondary stamping. This also would include
the smaller designs in which the representation is not actually
elevated from the vessel surface.
III. PanamA ViEJo Buack ON WuitE PANELED RED WaRE
IV. PanaMA VIEJO CEREMONIAL WARE
Including those elaborate vessels with geometrical designs and/or
three-dimensional modeled or appliqued sculptures (modeled-
relief brown ware).
V. PanaMA ViEJO URN WARES
1. Red urn ware, and the common red-brown covers
2. Relief urn ware
3. Black on white paneled red urn ware (covers only)
4. Red and black on white urn ware
The remaining painted sherds are represented by only one example
each and cannot be classified. ‘They are presented only for descrip-
tive purposes.
DISCUSSION
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION
The most important material from this site, for the tracing of
horizontal distribution, is the decorated brown ware. From _ the
Pearl Islands, Linné (1929) illustrates a nubbin sherd (p. 99), incised
animal feet (p. 81), and alligator and serpent designs in raised brown
ware with similar techniques in reed marking, shell marking, punching,
and incising (p. 90).
46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Raised brown ware sherds with animal designs are illustrated from
Punta Patifio, near the Gulf of San Miguel, deep in the Darien
(Linné, 1929, p. 154). It is possible that cultural influence extended
as far south. With the single exception of Linné’s work we have no
data from the Darien region of Panama. More tenuous identification
exists in the case of his scalloped profile rim from Trigan4, Colombia
(p. 33), which resembles our figure 8, d.
Recent work in Cupica, Colombia (Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1961), has
demonstrated identical fragments of our modeled-relief brown ware as
well as Cocle humpback polychrome effigies and other trade ware
from the Late period at Sitio Conte. This gives us a known, active
distribution area of over 250 miles to the southeast, into the Darien
jungle via land. This country is considered to be almost inaccessible
today even with our most modern equipment. The obvious route is
the sea passage via the Pearl Islands (which have similar pottery
types mentioned above), a considerably shorter distance. The inter-
mediate vessel shown by Reichel-Dolmatoff (1961, fig. xiii, 3-4) also
more closely links the modeled-relief brown ware of the present site
with that of the Santarem in Brazil as described by Palmatary (1939).
Across the Isthmus of Panama, the brown ware type pottery is
well known among local archeologists from Venado Beach; several
typical sherds and stone points are shown in plate 24. Similarly,
the same pottery is found across most of the Madden Lake region
in a broad zone up to 15 miles east of the Canal. Plate 25 shows
typical surface finds selected from several dozen sites exposed during
the dry season when the Lake drops. Plate 25, a, is an otherwise
typical point recovered unassociated from the Fort San Lorenzo area
near Col6n. These illustrated artifacts were selected from hundreds
because of their similarity to others presented herein.
From the distribution of similar pottery, points, and burials, related
cultures are seen to have occupied a wide band across the entire
Isthmus from the Atlantic to the Pacific, covering, and slightly to the
east of, the area occupied by the present day Canal Zone. It extends
out to the Pearl Islands in the south and into an as yet undetermined
area of the Darien. This distribution is reflected in map 3.
CONTACTS AND MIGRATIONS
Cultural contact definitely is shown with the westerly provinces,
primarily Coclé, through the admixture of polychrome vessels and
sherds. Unfortunately, these sherds are not stratified, and range from
periods which are considered to be characteristic of both early and
late Sitio Conte. Identifying goldwork and whole vessels were re-
covered from Venado Beach but have been published only in pre-
liminary form (Lothrop, 1956). Recent work has suggested Coclé
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 68]
PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE
2 wae
.v re) C
4 ‘a d
\ Ce: ee
Coclé
"Pacific Ocean
47
Map 3.—Distribution of Panama Viejo cultural traits.
48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
polychrome might be much more widely distributed than was
originally thought. It is present in other foci, rather than being
restricted to trade ware, throughout a portion of the Azuero Peninsula
and adjacent southeastern Veraguas. Until further details are avail-
able, we can only state with certainty that the Panam4 Viejo culture
had limited trade contacts with her classical polychrome neighbors to
the west. There is no evidence to suggest contact with the more
westerly Chiriqui or Costa Rica.
Contacts to the east are suggested by the distribution of pottery to
Darien, if not actual settlements of related cultures. Further explora-
tion of the Darien will be necessary before we are enlightened on this
point.
In contrast to actual contacts, the presence of shell marking and
incised spindle whorls tends to suggest a combination of vertical and
horizontal transmission of traits somewhere in the as yet remote past
of Central American migrations. Parallel shell edge stamping around
the vessel rims is known in Panama from the Girén site in Azuero
(Willey and Stoddard, 1954), where it was found in the possibly con-
temporaneous levels of the Santa Maria Phase, and from both the
Santa Maria and early Coclé levels at Sitio Conte (Ladd, 1957).
Shell stamping is also known from the Sarigua Phase at the Gulf of
Parita (Willey and McGimsey, 1954), though in this case the pottery
paste is quite different and there is a considerable time lag between the
estimated dates of Sarigua and Coclé. Shell stamping is a widely
distributed trait throughout Central America.
There are present two other traits of possible vertical significance,
i.e., urn burial and crack-lace pottery mending, which may represent
evidence of either direct migrations or counter migrations with South
America at some time in the history of this culture’s predecessors.
These have been discussed more fully above, and we are now beginning
to believe urn burial may represent a direct migration of much more
ancient origin and distribution throughout Mesoamerica than has
been thought previously. The evidence offered by polychrome
pottery traits is still more meager, but despite the difference in stylistic
development one is often tempted to draw relationships between
Mexico, Panama, and Peru.
CHRONOLOGY
In attempting to assign a date to the culture represented by this
site we have two essential cultural links: polychrome trade ware and
the Venado Beach site. Both of these have been subjected to recent
reexamination, and some doubt exists. When originally described
(Lothrop, 1942), the classic polychromes of Coclé were thought,
on the basis of style, to be representative of a unique local focus with
carta ls PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 49
wide trade contacts and of a relatively late date, i.e., ca. A.D. 1300-
1500. Later unpublished local work indicates the possibility of wider
distribution and independent production in several areas of Central
Panama. Stratigraphy at the Girén site and Sitio Conte would seem
to indicate a greater time span for the entire complex of decorated
brown ware and polychrome phases.
Still more recently (Lothrop, 1958 and 1959) a Venado Beach urn
burial has yielded a radiocarbon date of A.D. 227 +60 (Yale—125)
which was cross-dated with early Coclé polychromes. Dr. Lothrop
has suggested that this is too early and may represent a sampling or
technical error; the reader is referred to the above-cited two papers
for a thorough discussion of these and other dates from Panama.
In 1961 he announced a new Venado Beach radiocarbon determination
of 1000 years B.P. (Groningen No. 2200) from material found in
similar circumstances (i.e., charcoal from within plain red ware
burial urns). Once a date is accepted, we still have to decide the
relationship of this site to Venado Beach and the Lake area. On the
basis of trade wares present, Panam4 Viejo has very little, the Madden
area almost none, and Venado Beach a rather high proportion.
Similarly, the absence of both jewelry and trade ware points to an
economically poor or dependent tribe associated contemporaneously
with Venado Beach when the latter was the ceremonial or ruling center.
For at least a tentative assignment of relative dates in Panama
I am inclined to accept the Venado Beach radiocarbon date with a
slightly earlier date for Panama Viejo and a still earlier one (ca. 50-100
years) for Madden Lake.
INTERPRETIVE SUMMARY
A new Early Christian Era culture is described herein from Central
Panama. It is composed of a rather widespread group of related
tribes which shared common burial and ceramic traits, and were
distributed over the Canal Zone, the Pearl Islands, and the adjacent
territory to the east. The composite tribes perhaps are affiliated
loosely through common ethnic origins and maintain Venado Beach
as a “capital.”” Their characteristic economy was based largely on
shellfish and offshore gathering and limited agriculture supplemented
by small-animal hunting. Life appears to have been rather sedentary
and peaceful with limited trade contacts and possibly irregular
hazardous trips to the immediately adjacent east and west. Weaving
was practiced. Pottery skills were developed to a high degree, but
full classic polychromes are not indigenously present. Burial is
moderately ritualistic with special classes of pottery, but not formal-
ized to a high degree, and may occur in urns, open extended, or
secondary fashion. Deep level graves are not present, but a suggestion
50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
of mutilation occurs. The complicated skills of jewelry and gold
working, ceremonial stonework, and permanent structures are absent;
this more from economic position than artistic development, since
realistic clay sculpture is present. The identifying traits are: (1)
urn burial; (2) incised relief brown ware with zoomorphic patterns;
(3) certain red and brown ware combinations with shell, reed and
punch markings; (4) elaborate ceremonial or votive ware; (5) incised
spindle whorls; and (6) simple flake points without secondary elabora-
tion except crude tang formation and ground and polished stone
celts in a variety of patterns.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANDERSON, C. L. G.
1911. Old Panama and Castilla Del Oro. Washington, D.C.
Bancrort, Husert H.
1882-87. History of Central America. (1501-1530.) 3vols. San Francisco.
Brisseg, Lro P.
1960. Spindle whorls from Panama Viejo. Panama Archaeol., vol. 3, No. 1,
pp. 35-46. Canal Zone.
1961. The frog effigy and large polychrome vessels from Parita. Panama
Archaeol., vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 32-41. Canal Zone.
CaRLEs, RuBEN D.
1960. Old Panama. La Estrella de Panama. Patrick J. Smythe, trans.
Lapp, JOHN.
1957. A stratigraphic trench at Sitio Conte, Panama. Amer. Antiq., vol. 22,
No. 3, pp. 265-271.
Linn, SIGVALD.
1929. Darien in the past: The archaeology of Eastern Panama and North-
western Columbia. Gdéteborgs Kungl., Vetenskaps-och vitterhets-
samhalles handlinger, Femte Féljden, ser. A, band 1, No.3. Gothen-
burg.
LorHrop, SAMUEL K.
1937. Coclé, an archaeological study of Central Panama. 1. Mem. Pea-
body Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 7.
1942. Coclé, an archaeological study of Central Panama. 2. Mem. Pea-
body Mus. Harvard Univ., vol. 8.
1950. Archaeology of southern Veraguas, Panama. Mem. Peabody Mus.
Harvard Univ., vol. 9, No. 3.
1954. Suicide, sacrifice and mutilations in burials at Venado Beach, Panama.
Amer. Antiq., vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 226-234.
1956. Jewelry from the Panama Canal Zone. Archaeol., vol. 9, No. 1, pp.
34-40.
1958. The archaeological picture in southern Central America. Proc. 33d
Int. Cong. Amer., tomo 1, pp. 165-172. San Jose.
1959. A reappraisal of isthmian archaeology. Mitteilungen Hamburg Mus.
Volkerkunde, band 25.
1960. C 14 dates for Venado Beach, Canal Zone. Panama Archaeol., vol.
3, No. 1. Canal Zone.
MunsE.u Cotor Co., Inc.
1954. Munsell soil color charts. Baltimore.
Antrop.; 2 PREHISTORY OF PANAMA VIEJO—BIESE 51
PALMATARY, HELEN C.
1939. Tapajé pottery. Etnol. Stud., vol. 8, pp. 1-136. Gothenburg.
REICHEL-DoLMATOFF, GERARDO, and REIcHEL-DoLMatorr, ALICIA.
1961. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia, vol. 10, pp. 239-332. Bogotd.
SHAFROTH, JOHN F.
1953. Panama La Vieja; cincuentenario de La Republica. Imprenta Na-
cional. Panama.
SmirH, H. Morean.
1960. Diggers may find Pre-Spanish city. Jn Panama American, Sunday
American Supplement, Jan. 24. Panama.
Sosa, JuAN B.
1955. Panama La Vieja; con motive del cuarto centenario de su fundacion.
2d ed., Imprenta Nacional. Panama.
VINTON, KENNETH W.
1951. A new archaeological site in Panama. Scien. Monthly, vol. 73, No. 2.
WitueEy, Gorpon R., and McGimsgy, CHARLEs R.
1954. The Monagrillo culture of Panama. Pap. Peabody Mus. Harvard
Univ., vol. 49, No. 2.
Witiey, Gorpon R., and Stopparp, THEODORE.
1954. Cultural stratigraphy in Panama: A preliminary report on the Girén
site. Amer. Antiq., vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 332-343.
682-611—64—_7
. A ; y ins 7 ‘a oy ta
of ~chpemonstiypetpd ;
i ame pr |
| eine YT bt =
peer ec bs ‘sl
an Tee wat) , ae ea a
‘BabA Ate) Pee onteRH) 43) wed stadangget ian b ; ;
1 bits Tasik AR Bk forepetigcts ¥ f ’
s 4 ,
cio Lil enu SUN is etiide: Rete whe a
ib he hy Parse ty
mthies lve Adina a0 ay f
Fi ore).
eT a a Mi arcing Te Lt Ole oe uclinete Se aie
’ 1 ey ¢ Vii 7), bain jdt ‘Vi ;
j gb
needs Ae eT eT beeen’, Jo ovale. Olt eaee ee
BA ov Ul lov Aca.
| Mae Eh ta i Mas) al rir = Lite rt el
§ sdirearrel pel vee: eras
Hae AAG A OF, £3 toy pte wns
a
1?
iy ’ Le 7 Peer ‘17ft, or) s
4 ,
at
rol
"
Ls a
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BUEEERIN 191 PEATE, 1
Sacrifice burial.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 2
Serpent burial urn.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 3
Serpent burial urn.
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 4
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Mn
|
i
d urn and panel from incised monkey urn.
Painte
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 5
Votive ware double turtle-monkey effigy.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 6
Votive ware double bird effigy.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 7
Miscellaneous votive ware.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 8
Miscellaneous votive ware.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 9
Stone artifacts.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 10
Red ware vessels.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 11
Painted wares.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Lizard effigy vessel.
BULLETIN 191 PLATE
12
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Incised relief brown ware,
BULLETIN 191 PLATE
13
BUREAU
OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Incised relief brown ware.
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 14
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 15
Coclé-type red line ware and humpback effigy jar.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 16
Incised relief brown ware.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 17
Incised relief brown ware.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 18
Incised relief brown ware.
Seles cag Senerttenec
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 19
Rim sherds.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 20
“? ‘ai . 4 ‘ a £ ?
Rim sherds.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 21
Miscellaneous polychrome and paneled red ware.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 22
CM.
Spindle whorls.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 23
Miscellaneous ceramic objects.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 24
Artifacts from Venado Beach site.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 25
Artifacts from Madden Lake site.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 69
THE LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO
By IRVINE DAVIS
53
CONTENTS
PAGE
IEARES EK ee Se ee ee ee oe eee ae aE oe eerie et ee ae 57
PAINT OO iypey. 5. Beep. $3 woot 2 en seat ab mane =| Amie LIB h Mek) 2 a iS eee ee 59
Bilis blesstruGlune: a: 452.2 = eS pe RS a OR ee, et i 59
NWVORGUStrUCLUTCsE. Sac a= om Bey cree Ve eipceie Weeae ee) pel a Mee se eer es 64
SESSUNG W ERTT EY OT QUIS a te Py ge Pe et ey Seen 65
MOT pop ONeINICS = ate eae a ee ee Ae eae ee, eeenen eee we PES Wen eran 66
Wowellreductions) je hen sae Led. 3 eee Ee EE ee Se ee 66
Wiaille nen or ahie ae ee yn er ee deed ed eo be g he) Lah are aa aa 70
Mipcelanmeous| PrOGesses. 250525 245.3 2p Se eee De 72
lor puOlany = xe. ene cert, 2 a ee ate Mee Sees She beet Ae 73
Crear Sig oy Se NI Spa ek, PN J ea rey Se NG RL Re a Nie a 73
Wor diGlascegts ars a= a+ Sats at ubat leer mete ees, TE Le. El Seen ope eer eno ne ne 74
Werbssueuens fc Deel. NA ee Oe Ee Oe Pk 75
Verb finiflec tio mi aaeticrest st tpi dhe abe d Lae 2 sere ele eee eds. 2 ee Pas ak 75
Grammiaticalicatesories 2 2.0 22 2c ce 75
Iinilechional-ataxesls 2p he bet 2S papa en Le eee eee 78
IDistributionyOlvatixesee ta en eee oe ey ee 87
Werbtstemist= seri sc > Sen Ae ae be SE ee eer eee a ees ae 94
Stempformationetlers Lao. Fise sae? ee see eres a ee 94
Stem) variants: 24° tbat teens bis seen Spor kines ale Sia, 99
Verbrcore,deriviatlonast 42 Se ates ce ee ee ee 103
ViETD CLASSES Sawer OE Bec eS eg oe Rea Ly SRS fee os oS ee 105
FEransitiVenverps aes =e eee eae Se ts Fat his A wee eG Fon 105
Intransitive:verbs?ss=se phe he eee ee Tee ee tS 110
Werbalrausalianies ees 2 ame oi rete eet We A 114
Unimtiected!\ words i". AU 2k he rah ten NTI) Se ee oe eee 118
CLS (GS aa Ie a aN NE Bd PRON, ORE pe pa ANIA Neen abe pt ee i CRM SP oS 123
= fF] ES ea a gree dag S TOs Ok Np SS opie Pale eed ae de 124
Dehnition Of SyntachiGwmitss..2A2 020 2h ae ee ee ie ee 124
Majorftunction slotstand then, tillenss sss ea oe ee 125
‘Predicaterel obese ee oe ee a eet Ns ene 126
Pex POU BUEA Ca gals) C3) ape Maat eS AUP Be ip Ak. a UI ea Un) yh gl nt eee nee ee 128
Subject slots wes aos eee ee eee RIS ee en Sep epe Rae eee A eee 128
OB ERt Sl Otsu ee wots Fae OR wee a ons 2 eS aay Maes ee ee eh 130
Mirectional-locationalysloteseee ae ee ee ee ee ee 132
ADI Baa Vey FS) Koy rey epg po es 8, ee hE ee ee eS NR EG Saat Wi eo Seger pe a 133
Whiter slab 952) ioe ons ei wn ee he eee eee 134
intermmocatiye-modal slots 450 2 oe ne ee ee ae 134
GOnmeChVe slots ee heathens ers tea oe oe ee teeta ee 134
Sequential-orderine of function: slots... 22-225. ~ 2 ja4 se ace 135
Predicate crausess- a6 26) seer poet oo 2 eels eee ey eed Se 135
INOn=predicate clauses 232 5 2 a Ee Pe ee 138
Independent versus dependent clauses_______-___-___-_-_-_--_- 139
Supraciaime straenures ne) 2 sl iy ae ee od 139
(Bea AT ie PIL HORABIGCR Meee ot Nahe ee Oe eee ee a re 139
Womiplox ReUneIICES a Sw BE eke ie 140
uote tions eee wien eset ek REP Ty 2c) Seen) oe Al. Bs Sys Ont 141
682-611—64——_8
56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
PAGE
Appendix 1. Verb paradigms 2 oot es ee ee et ee 143
EAM STL: VETO MELINA yap Al aC TNS ee ee 143
iransitive'verb: secondary paradiamess 225222 e se eee ee 145
intransitive verb paradigms==—. - 2226 oe. 2a see ee 146
Opened: Lemp e228 tk on Se ee Ne eS ee 155
Hzplanation Of mumbers in texti2o—" = 2222 Ses sess ee eee 163
mopendix o., VOtHbUlaty soo 8 oo cree on coo etn ee ee 165
Wninflectedwords!2.2. = ose ee ee 165
Ve D SS ret ae ee ee a eee bee eS ee 169
Atixes andicliticst 22258. han le Sot eee eewc kee 176
oni words = eee Se OC Dee ee 180
Indextto vocabulary-1-2- 22: eee le eee ese. ee 182
aterature eitede == ne oe eee cee le ee en ee 190
PREFACE
Data for this monograph were collected at intervals from 1954
through 1961 under the auspices of the Summer Institute of
Linguistics. Much of the phonological material first appeared in
my master’s thesis and the grammatical material in my doctor’s
dissertation, both prepared at the University of New Mexico (1958
and 1960) under the supervision of Stanley S. Newman. Sincere
thanks are due the latter for his understanding guidance and for the
many hours of consultation spared from his busy schedule.
Many features of the language as recorded in this paper are shared
with the other Keresan dialects, among which Santa Ana is rather
centrally located both geographically and linguistically. While much
remains to be done in adequately describing Keresan linguistic
structure, it is hoped that this analysis will be found worthy of a place
among the contributions to our knowledge of a heretofore little-known
language. The analysis almost can be said to be that of an idiolect
rather than a dialect. It is based largely on data obtained from one
informant, a middle-aged man whose mother tongue is that of the
Santa Ana Pueblo. JI am deeply indebted to him for the endless
hours which he spent in patiently supplying the material without
which this work would have been impossible.
57
ait LL ee ae Be | | GATT ; a |
ie Oe A ae) aa 7 Sen =
eT NO ea
| : ro: ae Be rin:
i Smiise wo. Fs Ley =
] ’ ah pa
many % Merk vainiltigil =
os: whic EGA twa eo P Inia to qomivtonue efi Gane att he
et) sod bite ponnbitra gaipuaiqesbius 2 airl a walinl sd)-aob Mee
slode ioe Yad at coil leg! hothvilirentes To aie nd
botils ote mac ail) ar habronewt 24 4: es rail Sit to an terteah ee
wile’ @. aah. eine douly unornia siooleth cea a wide |
dowitoldwW vilanttarowel ban vilnoliqparsg6n2 hae hadonal 4
onfettionti! ttadotaa yoidtivenh eotanpaie af doh otf ae ae
orniley eto Yadiow bartoi eel Lite aterfies wit dette ba rote St oh,
nwoogd-elNit sielotarnd a to oubslwovel vo oF anoitne 1100 ote
Weiorbi wa To jac? od of Niwa od hexuertié Ametuste Albeo Ae
nD inet baatnide niah too ¢lvetal baaad ta ; ingint Bh cad ail
S0P.10 dae) af auune) witiog olw win betnalbhut 2 oa
meine anf wl 1s dab Nasab ta | ofdoy? ak
; 4% ; sat
hiorGiw lnitetane acd! p Ua Thi (Mutat he ad ddidey @
inet read oven blow of Ter eid? de
i) al J : a ee “es ; i
* 7 aay Lae
THE LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO
By Irvine Davis
PHONOLOGY
SYLLABLE STRUCTURE
Santa Ana Keresan utterances normally may be segmented ex-
haustively into recurrent structural units, or syllables, of the shape
CV. The syllable margin, C, is composed of a simple consonant or a
phonetically complex consonantal segment. The nucleus, V, consists
of a vowel or vocalic sequence, with or without terminal glottal
closure. A few loanwords and a word of possible onomatopoetic
origin contain syllables which are closed by a nasal:
nér4n orange (Spanish naranja)
?aydumbimer drum
Syllables closed by consonants other than a glottal stop, however,
are considered as an aberrant pattern.
Excluding sounds introduced by loanwords, there are 48 contras-
tive syllable margins: '
b d dy g
p t é k
p t é k
sb sd sd¥ sg
sp st sé sk
sp st st sk
Z Z
c ¢
é é
8 8 8
$ $ S
m n
m n
r
r
w y ee
Ww y
1 The symbols herein used conform to the orthography developed by Wick R. Miller (1959 a, 1959 b, and
1960).
59
60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The stops include a voiceless unaspirated series, b, d, and g; a
voiceless aspirated series, p, t, and k; and a glottalized series, p, t,
and k, at bilabial, alveolar, and velar points of articulation:
bi-su bee
pi-ta step on it
pi-ta let him step on it
di kupawa maybe he chopped
ti kupawaneE maybe we chopped
ti kupawa maybe I chopped
ga-ma his house
kA-ni let me walk
kA-ni he walked
The alveopalatals, d’, é, and é, require special comment. These
are grouped with the stops for the sake of symmetry and because
there is evidence for their historic development from a set of stops
parallel to the bilabial, alveolar, and velar sets. The voiceless
alveopalatal stop, d’, is unaspirated preceding a voiced vowel and
aspirated preceding a voiceless vowel:
cidya I caught him si-d¥a squirrel
The voiceless alveopalatal affricates, é and é, are aspirated and
elottalized respectively:
éigiya maybe he sat éGgtya sit
The Keresan dialects at the present are in various stages of transi-
tion to a structure which includes both a set of alveopalatal stops and
a set of affricates at the same point of articulation. Acoma, for
instance, has a few occurrences of glottalized alveopalatal stops which
contrast with the unglottalized phoneme. It also has unaspirated
alveopalatal affricates occurring in loanwords. The Santa Ana
dialect has unaspirated affricates in loanwords but has not developed
aspirated or glottalized alveopalatal stops as distinct phonemes.
Each of the above stops and affricates may occur in a sibilant
cluster:
sbiga woodpecker scédu?u =a crowd
sdii-er bowl-shaped skt-nd blackbird
sdyiudi? I (didn’t) give it to him wispI cigarette
sgd-wasr_ rat sté-c1 straight
spéré-n4 plate stisa six
sti-nd autumn skasi fish
There are voiceless unaspirated affricates, z and z; voiceless aspirated
affricates, c and ¢; and voiceless glottalized affricates, ¢ and ¢, at
alveolar and retroflexed points of articulation:
zadya desert zaku let him bite you
cact breath caku maybe you bit him
caku = it bit him caku maybe I bit you
Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 61
There is a series of voiceless sibilants, s, s and 8, and of glottalized
sibilants, §, $ and gs at alveolar, retroflexed and alveopalatal points of
articulation respectively:
sa back 3a mine
sa scattered $a you are mine
va ete E
$aska roadrunner haé-Suwimr shoe
The plain sonorants, m, n, r, w, and y, and the glottalized sono-
rants, m, n, t, Ww, and y, are normally voiced but occur as voiceless
variants when flanked by voiceless vowels:
kiicayawa he is angry sgihima I believe
In their occurrence between a voiced and a voiceless vowel they may be
voiceless, partly voiced, or fully voiced, depending on factors such as
the rate of speech:
diya dog cina turkey gi-ma his house
Unlike other glottalized consonants, which are produced with the
glottis closed, glottalized sonorants are initiated with a momentary
glottal closure and release.
The nasals are produced at bilabial and at alveolar or alveopalatal
points of articulation. The alveopalatal variant occurs preceding a
front vowel, while the alveolar form occurs elsewhere:
mésé-ni_ leaf mé4-ni word
not prairie dog ne down
néku will bite ni-ziwa will pay
The phonemes r and ¢ are alveolar flaps, while w, w, y and y are
nonsyllabic vocoids:
rawdé- good stita crow
wi-wd4 medicine waé-yusa duck
ya?di sand yauni stone
The ‘glottal fricative,’ h, and the glottal stop, ?, complete the
inventory of native consonants:
hd-bi feather 24?4-tawi key
Sounds introduced through loanwords include the voiceless unas-
pirated alveopalatal affricate, Z; the voiced stops, B, D and «a; and
the voiced alveolar lateral, 1:
Zi-Ti chili
Bend4-na window (Spanish ventana)
?amd-pu = pillow (Spanish almohada)
Gayé-ta biscuit (Spanish galleta)
1é-Ba coat (Spanish leva)
Phonemic sequences introduced by loanwords include stops plus
r or | and nasals plus homorganic stops:
bla-sa city (Spanish plaza)
sandiya-ku St. James (Spanish Santiago)
62
Vowels are produced at five contrastive tongue positions and
may be either voiced or voiceless:
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
High front unrounded, i and 1.
Mid to low front, e and E.
Low central, a and a.
High central to back unrounded, 9 and @.
Mid to high back rounded, u and v.
Examples of the five voiced vowels in initial syllables are as follows:
séwi my neck
sdnaA middle
si again
sa back
siw4 yesterday
Voiced and voiceless vowels are in nearly complementary distri-
bution. Relevant conditioning factors include the position of the
vowel within larger phonological units, the pattern of suprasegmental
features, and the nature of contiguous consonants. Word-final
vowels, for instance, are normally voiceless if they are short, un-
accented, and not preceded by an unglottalized sonorant which is in
turn preceded by a long accented or by an unaccented vowel:
cinA turkey éA-pI fly
tA-ma _ five gupl forehead
Compare:
Sina- louse gasé white
dv4-na four gdnami beans
There are, however, a number of words containing voiced vowels
in environments in which voiceless vowels normally occur. It is
because of these occurrences that phonemic significance must be
ascribed to voicing versus voicelessness in vowels:
gudi give it to me mina salt
sbiga woodpecker kdsdi_ his foot
Examples of the five voiceless vowels in final and in medial positions
are as follows:
not prairie dog kéucrgai maybe
SUpE I ate ziyucEya — he carried it
?awaka baby yawasti stick
ki-ka winter héeaskéwa willow
yuku away zikusdyawi bridge
Vowels occur singly or in clusters of two.
sequences have been recorded:
iu as in siuni
ei as in dvéicr
eu as in Géu’?u
ai as in sai
AI as in ¢Cikar
au as in hau
ui as in stlist
ua occurring in the data only in pdguara
The following vowel
I know him
pinion pine
I gave it to him
all
he lay down
who
bluejay
salamander
Anthrop, Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 63
The nucleus of a syllable consists of one of the single vowels or
vowel clusters, with or without terminal glottal closure. The nucleus
is also the domain of certain suprasegmental features yet to be de-
scribed. ‘Terminal glottal closure is written as a segmental feature
only in unstressed syllables:
ndza? will say si-ba?tu I slept
Contrastive suprasegmental features include accent and vowel
length. There are four kinds of accent: level, indicated by an acute
accent; falling, indicated by a circumflex accent; breathy, indicated
by a grave accent; and glottal, indicated by an apostrophe over the
vowel. Unaccented vowels are not marked. Level accented vowels
are stressed and normally have a high level pitch:
kder ten zawini old
There is a tendency for a slight upglide in pitch on long vowels or
vowel clusters with level accent:
ké-ct antelope hdéubaé- everyone
The pitch on level accented vowels is conditioned to some degree by
the position in the word and by the nature of the preceding consonant.
A vowel preceded by a plain sonorant, for instance, often has a higher
relative pitch than a vowel in a comparable position but preceded by
one of the other consonants. The two vowels of ¢4m4 tomorrow
normally have approximately the same pitch, while there is a pro-
nounced drop in pitch on the second syllable of g48é white.
Falling accent occurs only on long vowels or vowel clusters and is
characterized by a downglide in pitch together with diminishing
stress:
dé-ni pumpkin yAuni stone mésé-ni_ leaf
Vowels or vowel clusters with breathy accent begin with voicing and
terminate in voicelessness. The initial voiced segment is short and
stressed, and has a relatively high pitch:
cact breath maidvana seven
Single short accented vowels or accented vowel clusters which are
terminated by glottal closure are written with the glottal accent:
gaku he is located saubénaca I sewed
A voiceless echo vowel may follow the release of the glottal stop,
although this is not a consistent feature. The reasons for treating
glottal accent as a phenomenon distinct from the glottal closure in
unstressed syllables derive largely from comparative considerations.
Vowel length always occurs with falling accented vowels and may
occur with level accented or with unaccented vowels:
pa-ni bag Gind river hawe- snow
A slight downglide in pitch tends to occur on final long unaccented
vowels.
64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Potential combinations of the 48 syllable margins with the various
types of nuclei number several thousand. Only a fraction of these,
however, actually occur in the data. The lack of some combinations
may be attributed to incomplete data or to the extremely low proba-
bility of certain rare types of nuclei following the less common margins.
The absence of other kinds of combinations is apparently a relevant
feature of the phonological structure. The more important of these
are as follows:
1. A bilabial semivowel, w or w, is never followed by the back rounded
vowel, u.
2. An alveopalatal semivowel, y or y, is never followed by the high front
vowel, i.
3. A retroflexed consonant, ¢, ¢, z, %, 8, or $, is never followed by a front
vowel, i or e. ;
4. An alveopalatal affricate or fricative, é, ¢, 8, or g, is never followed by the
high central unrounded vowel, a.
5. The voiceless unaspirated stops and affricates, b, d, g, z, and z are never
followed by a voiceless vowel.
WORD STRUCTURE
The definition of a word is treated in a later section. Here the
general phonological structure of words is described.
Words may be composed of a single syllable, za no, but are more
often dissyllabic or polysyllabic. Words of up to nine syllables have
been recorded: sgi-wakaéaniguyase-tH we are (not) looking at them.
With few exceptions, each of the 48 margins may occur in any
syllable of the word. The margins s¢, ¢ and § show evidence of
special development and occur only word-initially as verb prefixes.
Although h is very common initially, its extremely low frequency of
occurrence in medial position is significant. In the present data it
occurs in this position only in gtih4ya bear and in verbs based on the
cores, -hima to believe and -hé?é-z4nt to permit.
Each of the single voiced vowels may occur in any syllable of the
word, while the voiceless vowels may occur in any except the initial
syllable. Of the vowel clusters, iu is found almost exclusively in the
initial syllable of verbs where it is divided by a morpheme boundary.
The distribution of eu is similar, although the particle ?eu is of very
frequent occurrence. The sequences ai, au, and ui are found in all
positions in the word, while the remaining clusters occur so infre-
quently that generalizations are impossible.
Level accented syllables, both short and long, are found in all
positions in the word. The glottal accent may occur on any syllable,
but only rarely on other than the first. Falling and breathy accents
may occur on an initial or medial, but never a final, syllable. Although
any syllable of the word may be unaccented, the initial syllable is
accented in an overwhelming majority of the words.
Anthrop. Pap.
myo Ro]? LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 65
Word patterns based on the number of syllables and the arrange-
ment of suprasegmental features are extremely varied. The more
commonly occurring patterns found among dissyllabic and trisyllabic
words are indicated below:
CVCV niya night
CVCV gAsé white
CV-CV sté-c1 straight
CV-CV sbi-n4 chicken
CV-CV da-ni pumpkin
CVCV déeku they went
CVCV cécl wall
CVCVCV sinani flesh
CVCVCV ?AsAni wheat
CVCVCV dimay4 Santa Ana Pueblo
CVCV-CV skiré-né& peas
CVCV-CV hiy4-ni road
CVCVCV ?iwaka baby
CV-CVCV nt-bada alone
CV-CVCV ya-Cint corn
CY-CV-CV ?d-mii-cr gun
CV-CVCV di-skima cornhusk
CV-CVCV wa-yuga duck
CVCVCV maidyana seven
RHYTHM GROUPS
A rhythm group is a segment of speech which is marked off by
pauses and/or which is characterized by the presence of one syllable of
extra intensive stress. This unit may consist of an isolated mono-
syllabic word, such as yu- J don’t know, but ordinarily embraces a
sequence of many syllables. In normal speech (i.e., in which there are
no hesitation pauses) the boundaries of a rhythm group fall at word
boundaries, although every word boundary is not a rhythm group
boundary. The number of words included in a rhythm group depends
on the grammatical content of the particular utterance and on the
style of speech. A free flowing conversational style is characterized
by rhythm groups that include relatively long segments of speech.
Such extensive groups are consequently few in number in relation to
those in a comparable utterance delivered in a more vigorous or in a
more hesitating style of speech. In rapid speech the pauses tend to
be few in number and the onset of a new rhythm group may be signaled
only by a rise in intensity and pitch on an accented syllable. This
syllable is most often the initial syllable of the rhythm group.
Rhythm groups are normally characterized by a gradual falling off
of the general pitch level and intensity following the syllable which
receives the greatest stress. The extent of this falling off depends on
the length of the rhythm group. Toward the end of a very long
66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
rhythm group the speech may fade into a whisper in which normally
voiced phonemes are unvoiced.
In contrast to normal rhythm groups, an utterance may sometimes
show no diminishing of pitch on successive accented syllables. This is
true of certain types of questions or other utterances for which a
response is anticipated:
ma- ha4awé- su ?imdmd Listen here, grandchild. . .
Hortatory utterances often are characterized by a gradual diminish-
ing of the pitch level as in a normal rhythm group until the final
syllable is reached. The final syllable is then given an extra emphasis
that involves the rearticulation of a normally voiced vowel or the
voicing of a normally voiceless vowel together with added intensity
and pitch:
hawé- ?i-ma?d Come here!
disi ba Ciyai-kami Waitt for me here!
Compare the same utterances without the hortatory emphasis:
hawé- ?i-ma |
disi ba ¢iyd-kam1
MORPHOPHONEMICS
The morphophonemic rules outlined below consist of a series of
statements which simplify the morphological description to follow.
Included for consideration are a number of changes in stems and in
affixual morphemes which are somewhat regular and which can be
explained on the basis of the phonological environment. Two
processes, vowel reduction and the voicing or unvoicing of vowels, are
rather extensive in their operation and are described in the following
two sections respectively. ‘Miscellaneous Processes” deals with a
number of phenomena of more restricted occurrence.
Excluded for consideration here are numerous cases of phonolog-
ically similar forms (e.g., the second person subject markers s- and
8-) which at an earlier stage in the language may have been in mutually
exclusive distribution in terms of their phonological environment.
In a synchronic description of the present Santa Ana dialect, however,
they are most conveniently treated as allomorphs, the distribution of
which is defined morphologically rather than phonologically.
VOWEL REDUCTION
Changes in the vowel or vowels immediately following the pronom-
inal affix in verbs may often be explained in terms of vowel reduction.
This involves a fusing of the thematic adjunct with a preceding voice
prefix or with the vowel of a preceding pronominal affix. Vowel
reduction normally follows the patterns outlined below.
An roP 4; 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 67
1. Two contiguous identical vowels reduce to a single vowel of
the same quality. This reduction takes place, for instance, when a
pronominal prefix of the shape CV- precedes a stem having an initial
vowel of the same quality as that of the prefix:
saku (Sa- + -aku) I bit you
Compare:
sduni (Sa- + -tni) I know you
Apparent shifts in accent in the above and other examples arise from
orthographic conventions. Accent is indicated only on the first
vowel of a cluster, although it is the entire cluster that is accented.
This, together with the fact that accent is not indicated on prefixes
of the shape CV- (the prefix vowel assumes the accent of the following
thematic adjunct), results in a shift of the written accent to the prefix
vowel. Vowel reduction of the above type also occurs when the
reflexive prefix -a- or the passive prefix -4?a- precedes a verb stem
beginning with -a-:
siku (§- + -a- + -Aku) you bit yoursel
SA?agune (S- + -d4?a- + -Agune) you were bitten
Compare:
gaukaéa (8- + -a- + -tkaéa) you saw yourself
SA’audi?ta (S + -d?a- + -tdi?ta) it was given to you
2. No vowels or vowel clusters of more than two moras’ length
occur. A reduction from three to two moras of length takes place
when a short and long vowel are juxtaposed:
ci-zawa (¢i- + -{-ziwa) I paid him
cuizGwa (Cu- + -f-ztiwa) you paid me
3. The vowel -u- followed immediately by -a- reduces to the single
vowel -a-. This occurs when the pronominal prefix ends with -u- and
the verb stem begins with -a-:
éaku (Gu- + -aku) you bit me
kaku (ku- + -Aakv) bite me
skaku (sku- + -aku) he bit me
Compare:
Gdiziwa (éu- + -{-ztiwA) you paid me
ktiziwa (ku- + -{-ztiwA) pay me
sktiziwa (sku- + -i-ziwa) he paid me
4. The vowel -i- immediately followed by -a- reduces to the single
vowel -e-. This takes place when a pronominal prefix ending with
—i— precedes a verb stem beginning with —a-:
séku (si- + -Aku) TI bit him
téku (ti- + -aku) maybe I bit him
péku (pi- + -aku) let him bite him
68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Compare:
sfukAica (si- + -t-kaica) I hit him
tiukaica (ti- + -i-kaica) maybe I hit him
piukadica (pi- + -G-kaica) let him hit him
5. The vowel -i- immediately followed by -o- reduces to the single
vowel -i-. This takes place when certain stems beginning with -9-
are preceded by a prefix containing -i-:
siska (si- + -dsk a) I drank
si-t4 (si- + -d-t4) I am full
Compare:
gaska (g- + -dskA) he drank
gé-ta (g- + -d-td) at is full
6. The vowel -a- followed immediately by -o- reduces to the se-
quence -ai-. This change occurs in the first person hortative form
of some verbs having stems which begin with -a-:
kaiska (ka- + -§ska) let me drink
Compare:
kdiba?tu (ka- + -i-ba?tu) let me sleep
7. The vowels -a- and -u- followed immediately by a short level
accented -i- reduce to -4- and -1- respectively:
Sdsti (Sa- + -fsti) I gave you a liquid
dyusti (dyu- + -isti) you gave me a liquid
Compare:
zisti (zi- + -isti) he gave him a liquid
A vowel cluster results, however, if the -i- is characterized by any other
type of accent.
sdiziwa (sa- + -f-ztiwa) J paid you
Chita (cu- + -f-ta) you stepped on me
ciisaca (Cu- + -i$acA) you named me
The patterns of vowel reduction outlined above avoid the following
vowel sequences: -ua-, -la-, -io-, -ae- and double vowels. With the
exception of a single recorded example of -ua-, these vowel clusters do
not occur in Santa Ana Keresan. Other nonoccurring sequences,
-le-, -ae-, -e0-, -ea-, -0e-, -ol-, -aa-, -oU-, -ue- and -uo-, involve vowels
which are never brought into juxtaposition in morphological con-
structions.
In addition to the vowel reduction already described there are
certain patterns of reduction which involve semivowels. A stem-
initial -uw- (in which the -u- is short) reduces to -w- when preceded
by a prefix of the shape CV-:
ziwa-sa (zi- + -Gwa-sa) he 7s sick
Antrop4; 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 69
Compare:
guzuiwa-sa (géz- + -tiwa-sa) you are sick
Under similar conditions -1y- reduces to -y-. This reduction, how-
ever, may be alternatively explained as an example of the pattern
u+i->t previously described.
sktiyanikuya (sku- + -fyanikuya) he told me
Compare:
éfyanikuya (¢i- + -fyanikuya) TI told him
In stems of four or more syllables, an initial -uwi- (but not -uwi-
or -uwi--) reduces to -ui- when preceded by a prefix of the shape C-:
guistkuya (g- + -tiwiStkuya) he scolded him
The reduction of -uw- to -w- as described above occurs in the same
stem when the prefix is of the shape CV-:
siwistkuya (si- + -uwiSikuya) TI scolded him
Vowel reduction similar to the patterns already described some-
times operates across an intervening glottal stop. The following
types of reduction have been recorded:
1. -i- plus -a?a- reduces to -e?e-:
sé760a (si- + -A?4¢a) my tooth
Compare:
ZAPAGA (z- + -A?4éA) his tooth
2. -i?- plus -a?a- reduces to -é-?e-:
pé-?6-8a (pi?- + -4?4-3a) let him close tt
Compare:
$A74-8a (S- + -4?4-5a) you closed it
3. -i?- plus a short -i- or -o- with level or breathy accent reduces
to -i- when followed by a voiceless consonant:
pikupawa (p{?- + -fkupawa) let him chop
piska (pi?- + -dska) let him drink
Compare:
zikupAwa (z- + -fkupawa) he chopped
gdska (g- + -dska) he drank
Under similar conditions -i?- plus -a- reduces to -é- and -i?- plus -u-
reduces to -iu-:
pezé (pi?- + -dzé) let him be talkative
piukdi (pi?- + -tkdi) let him be satisfied
Compare:
gazé (g- + -dzé) he is talkative
kikdi (k- + -tkdi) he is satisfied
70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Jf the following consonant is a sonorant, -i?- plus -a- becomes -e’e-,
-1?- plus -u- becomes -iyu-, and no change is involved if the second
vowel is -i-:
pé?éyaka (pi?- + -dyaka) let him burn it
piytyd (pi?- + -ty4) let him skin it
pi?inata (pi?- + -fnata) let him buy it
Compare:
zdyaka (z- + -dyaka) he burned it
gaya (g- + -ty4) he skinned it
zinata (z- + -inata) he bought it
Changes in the vowel following the pronominal suffix of Type B
intransitive verbs are only partly explained in terms of the regular
patterns of vowel reduction. The shift to -e or -E in the first person
forms of verbs normally taking -a or -a follows the regular pattern of
reduction in which -i- plus -a- becomes -e-:
26.36 (?6.- + -si- + -4) my name
ca-sE (c4:- + -si- + -a) TI breathed
Compare:
?é-94 his name
ca-ka he breathed
The shift to -e or -5 in the first person forms of verbs normally
occurring with -u or -u, however, does not result from any regular
pattern of reduction:
zusE I went
zuku he went
VOICING
Voiceless vowels occurring in the final syllable (and sometimes those
occurring in the penultimate syllable) of a word become voiced under
certain conditions of suffixation. A word-final voiceless vowel
becomes voiced if it is followed by a suffix containing a voiced vowel:
dvukséanikuya (dytvkaéa+-nikuya) you are looking at me
dé?4cinu- (d4?4é1+4--nu-) when he arrived
Compare:
dvukaéa you saw me
da? der he arrived
Suffixes consisting of a glottalized sonorant followed by a voiceless
vowel have a similar effect on a preceding vowel:
gigune (giku+-ne) they bit him
éiéang (é0éa+-na) maybe they two fell
Compare:
gaku he bit him
éaéa maybe he fell
Anthrop.j9?- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS (ip
A voiceless vowel cluster becomes voiced when followed by any suffix:
stigaitn (stikat+-tn) I (didn’t) lie down
Compare:
skiikat I lay down
Vowel clusters resulting from the suffixation of -kuya (see ‘‘Mis-
cellaneous Processes’’) are likewise voiced:
subeukuya (supE+-kuya) I am eating
Compare:
supE I ate
Certain final voiceless vowels become voiced and long when followed
by any suffix:
sdudvimise-te (sdudyamisE-+-tE) we (don’t) remember you
Compare:
sdudyimise (sdudyimi-+ plural suffix, -8E) we remember you
It cannot be predicted from the phonological environment whether
or not a voiceless vowel undergoes this change (see ‘“‘Stem variants’’).
The fact is indicated in the listing of forms by the vowel length symbol
in parentheses:
-SE(-) plural suffix
A sequence (vowel + unglottalized semivowel ++ vowel) in which
neither vowel is accented, behaves as a single unit with respect to
voicing; it is either completely voiceless or completely voiced. A
voiceless sequence of this type becomes voiced when followed by any
suffix:
sitiguyasa (satikuya+-sa) you are crying
Compare:
satikuya you cried
Of much less frequent occurrence than the above processes is the
unvoicing of a stem-final vowel. This occurs when a completely
voiceless suffix follows a stem which normally terminates in an un-
accented voiced vowel preceded by a voiceless consonant:
s4utisa (S4udi+-sa) I am planting
Compare:
sdudi I planted
The alternation between aspirated and unaspirated consonants
seen in some of the examples cited in this section is closely linked to
the voicing and unvoicing of vowels. The unaspirated consonants,
b, d, g, z, and z, do not occur preceding voiceless vowels. When a
normally voiced vowel is unvoiced, as in J am planting, a preceding
682-611—64_9
i2 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
consonant of this group changes to its aspirated counterpart, p, t, k,
c, or ¢. When a normally voiceless vowel is voiced, a preceding
aspirated consonant is usually replaced by its unaspirated counter-
part:
gagune (gaAku+-ne) they bit him
There are, however, exceptions to the latter rule, in which an aspirated
consonant is retained when the following vowel becomes voiced:
zikupawank (zikupAwA+-nE) they chopped
Compare:
zikupawAa_ he chopped
MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES
Vowel assimilation.—The vowels -a- or -9- occurring in prefixes
of the shape CVC- change to -u- when the prefix is attached to verb
stems beginning in -u-:
eGzukaca (gdz- + -tkaéa) he saw you
tti?udvasr (t4?- + -tidyasr) maybe I fasted
Compare:
gézaku (géz-+ aku) he bit you
ta?auta (té?-+-Auta) maybe I killed it
The vowel cluster -ai- changes to -ei- following an alveopalatal
consonant:
ééiwadvameE (é- + -diwadvamhE) they assembled
Compare:
s4iwadvamE we assembled
Change from glottal to level accent.—A glottal accent in the thematic
adjunct normally changes to a level accent following a pronominal
prefix containing a glottalized consonant:
éGpe (& + -ipr) eat
Compare:
SUupE you ate
This type of change does not affect the 4 allomorph of the passive
voice prefix:
skadva?ta (sku- + -A- + -ddya?ta) I was caught
Certain verb stems with a glottalized sonorant following the thematic
adjunct show a shift to a plain sonorant when the pronominal prefix
contains a glottalized consonant:
éiwane (é- + -Gwane) hunt
Compare:
siwanE you hunted
an 89,2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 4S}
The glottalized sonorant in stems of this kind may have developed
from a plain sonorant preceded by a glottal accent in the thematic
adjunct, and thus undergoes the above change. Other stems with a
glottalized sonorant in a comparable position do not show this change:
kéwasd4 it is sour
Introduction of -u-.—The addition of the continuative suffix -kuya
to a verb stem ending in -a, -e, or their voiceless counterparts, results
in the formation of a vowel cluster the second member of which
rhs Dee
subeukuya (supe + -kuya) I am eating
siwi-deyaukuya (siwi-teya + -kuya) I am worshiping
Compare:
supE I ate
siwi-teya I worshiped
Change of ¢ to t—The phoneme ¢ in the final syllable of a word
changes to t when followed by a high front vowel:
siwi-tita (stiiwi-ca + -(i)ta) I am making it?
Compare:
siwi-ca I made it
Certain pronominal prefixes also show a shift from a retroflexed
affricate to an alveolar stop (e.g., sdz- and sdd-; see charts 1 and 2).
These allomorphs undoubtedly have developed from the process
outlined above, but are, in the present stage of the language, no longer
phonologically defined. Forms ending in d sometimes occur before
vowels other than 1:
séda Iam
MORPHOLOGY
UNITS OF ANALYSIS
While the validity of the word as a universal linguistic unit is some-
times questioned, it is found convenient in this description of the
grammatical structure of Santa Ana Keresan to recognize such a
unit. The morphology-syntax division employed here is based on
the assumption that the word can be defined with sufficient precision
for descriptive purposes. This does not mean, however, that there
may not remain a certain degree of arbitrariness in the drawing of
some word boundaries.
The principal criterion for recognizing words is that of unlimited
substitutability at word boundaries.* Severe restrictions on the
2 For an explanation of the change in the stem-final vowel, see ‘‘Inflectional affixes’ and ‘‘Stem variants.’’
3 A full treatment of this approach to the definition of a word is given in Greenberg, 1957, pp. 27-34.
74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
number and types of items that may be introduced into an utterance
at a morpheme boundary is taken as an indication that the boundary
is an infraword boundary. The boundary between a verb core and
a following plural subject suffix, for instance, is of this type. The
only items that may be introduced at this point are aspect and/or
benefactive morphemes, neither of which ever occurs except following
a verb core.
A morpheme boundary at which a wide variety of items may be
introduced, on the other hand, is regarded as a word boundary.
Although a verbal auxiliary is closely linked to a preceding verb core
and is meaningless in isolation, it is, nevertheless, a separate word
according to the above criterion. Not only may a number of suffixes
occur following the verb core and preceding the auxiliary, but also
items which, on the basis of distributional criteria, are themselves
free words may be introduced at this point.
Words may be exhaustively segmented into morphemes. The
term is used here in the sense generally used in American descriptive
linguistics and includes word roots as well as various kinds of deriva-
tional and inflectional affixes and clitics. Clitics in Santa Ana
Keresan are morphemes which, following the distributional criteria
for marking word boundaries, are parts of words. They differ from
affixes in that they are not so closely linked phonologically to the
rest of the word. Specifically, they do not cause morphophonemic
voicing of a preceding voiceless vowel and are much more likely than
are affixes to be separated from the rest of the word by a pause.
WORD CLASSES
Three major word classes are distinguished on the basis of their
internal structure. Of these, the verbs and the verbal auxiliaries
occur with inflectional affixes. The third major word class is composed
of all uninflected words.
Three principal levels of internal structuring are recognized in
words: inflection, stem formation, and derivation. The terms inflec-
tion and inflectional affixes are used only with reference to those affixes
which are external to the stem. Stem formation involves the combina-
tion of a thematic adjunct with a core and may include the addition of
a benefactive suffix as well. The term derivation is used with reference
to the internal structuring of certain verb cores and of some words of
the uninflected class. Although clitics are, by definition, parts of
words rather than free words, they are disregarded in the following
description of word structure and are reserved for separate considera-
tion.
An roPy; 2 ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 75
The general structure of the three major word classes may be
distinguished as follows:
1. Verbs are always inflected, always include stem formation and
sometimes include derivation.
2. Verbal auxiliaries are always inflected but never include stem
formation or derivation.
3. Uninflected words include neither inflection nor stem formation
but may include derivation.
Specific morphemes involved in each level of structuring also may
serve to distinguish the major word classes. Verbs are distinguished
from verbal auxiliaries, for instance, in that all verb stems are po-
tentially capable of occurring with a future tense marker while verbal
auxiliaries never include this morpheme.
VERBS
VERB INFLECTION
GRAMMATICAL CATEGORIES
The following grammatical categories are expressed by verb inflec-
tion, or, less commonly, by changes in the verb stem:
Subject person.—First, second, or third person subject is recognized
in all intransitive verbs in the non-future tense. It is most commonly
indicated by a prefix, although in some verbs the pronominal element
is a suffix:
s-upE I ate zu-sE I went
s-UpE you ate zu-su you went
k-lupE he ate zu-ku he went
In addition, some verbs occur with a pronominal morpheme indicating
indefinite subject:
sk-Aukui one’s wives
Subject-object person.—The subject and object of every transitive
verb in the non-future tense are indicated by a single prefix. Seven
principal subject-object combinations are recognized.
First person subject with third person object: s-éku I bit him
Second person subject with third person object: s-aku you bit him
Third person subject with third person object: g-aku he bit him
First person subject with second person object: s-Aku I bit you
Second person subject with first person object: éaku you bit me
Third person subject with first person object: sk-aku he bit me
Third person subject with second person object, géz-Aku he bit you
In some, but not all, transitive verbs a fourth person subject with third
person object is recognized which is distinct from the third person
subject with third person object:
g-aku he (third person) bit him
é-aku he (fourth person) bit him
76 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Fourth person is used when the subject of the action is obscure, as
when the speaker is telling of something that he himself did not
observe. It is also used when the subject of the action is inferior
to the object, as when an animal is the subject and a human being the
object.
Number.—Singular, dual, and plural number are recognized in
both the subject of intransitive verbs and in the subject and object
of transitive verbs. The dual and plural of transitive verb subjects
are normally expressed by suffixation, while the absence of number
suffixes indicates singular subject:
gaku he bit him
gagu-na they two bit him
gagu-nE they bit him
Subject number of intransitive verbs may be indicated in a variety
of ways:
1. By suffixation as in the case of transitive verbs:
zikUpAWA he chopped
zikupawa-na they two chopped
zikupawa-nE they chopped
2. By changes in the thematic adjunct (i.e., the vowel or vocalic
complex that ordinarily immediately follows the pronominal affix).
These changes are usually accompanied by other number markers but
may sometimes constitute the only indication of number:
g-du-dvasi he fasted
g-U-?i-dyasr they two fasted
g-ti-wa-dvasr_ they fasted
3. By the prefixation of different sets of pronominal allomorphs
together with suffixation and/or changes in the thematic adjunct:
s-iska | I drank
s6z-askA we two drank
séz-Askata we drank
Object number of transitive verbs is indicated by changes in the
thematic adjunct:
s-é-ku I bit him
s-é-?éku I bit them two
s-éiya-ku I bit them
Tense—Future and non-future tenses are recognized. Verbs
which include a pronominal affix are in the non-future tense. Future
tense is indicated by replacing the pronominal affix with a tense
marker. The pronominal element is then incorporated in a separate
word, the verbal auxiliary, which follows the verb:
sdiziwa I paid you Hi-ziwa sfuma I will pay you
supE I ate nupE si I will eat
ga a al LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 77
Mode.—Pronominal affixes indicate not only the person of the
subject or the subject and object but also indicate the mode. For
each mode there is a distinctive set of pronominal affixes. A total of
six modes are recognized; indicative, negative, dubitative, hortative,
negative hortative, and future hortative. For each subject-object
combination, however, only certain modes are indicated formally in the
inflection:
¢-i-zuwa I paid him 8-f-zwa you paid him
sdy-i-ziwa I (didn’t) pay him $-{-z0WA you (didn’t) pay him
t-f-2tiwa maybe I paid him c-{-zuwa maybe you paid him
ké-iziwa let me pay him p-i-ziwa pay him
n-{-zuwa let me (not) pay him sdy-i-ziwa (don’t) pay him
n-{-zuwa let me pay him (in c-i-ziiwa pay him (in the
the future) future)
Certain particles characteristic of specific modes may precede the verb
and are often necessary in order to avoid ambiguity. Verbs in the
negative mode, for instance, are always preceded by the negative
particle z4zi, and those in the negative hortative mode by the particle
ba-mi-:
zai sd¥i-ziwa I didn’t pay him
bé-mi- sd¥f-ztiwa don’t pay him
Voice.—Reflexive-reciprocal and passive voice are indicated by a
prefix following the pronominal prefix of transitive verbs together
with a distinctive set of pronominal allomorphs. Reflexive and
reciprocal voice are indicated by the prefix -a- and are distinguished
one from the other by different thematic adjuncts:
s-a-ukaéa I saw myself
s-A-ukaéanotI we two saw ourselves
$-4--yakaéanati we two saw each other
Passive voice is indicated by the prefix -4?a- or -4- and takes the plural
subject suffix:
sk-4?4-iziwa-ne I was paid
Aspect.—There are three aspect morphemes. The most common
of these expresses continuative action:
sfukaéa-nikuya I am looking at him
Compare:
sfukaéa J saw him
A less common aspect morpheme indicates unfulfilled action:
supE-wE I have come to eat
Compare:
supE I ate
78 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The third aspect morpheme indicates a remote state and occurs with
only a limited number of verb stems:
g6-ta--ma it is full (something remote from the speaker)
Compare:
d-té it is full (something at hand)
Condition.—Verbs which are linked to the larger context by various
kinds of subordinate or conditional relationships occur with one
of a class of suffixes of rather elusive semantic categorization:
sktiztiiwa--ne when he paid me
skiiziwa--nu- if he pays me
Compare:
skiiziwa he paid me
In addition to the patterns of inflection indicated above, the expression
of specific grammatical categories sometimes involves irregular changes
in the verb stem (see pp. 99 ff.). In some cases there are changes of
such a revolutionary character that the phenomenon may best be de-
scribed as stem suppletion, which most commonly involves intransi-
tive verbs in the three numbers:
ZU-SE I went
sdd-é?éyu we two went
séd-éku we went
In rare cases, the expression of continuative action or of plural object
number in transitive verbs involves stem suppletion:
é-Aku he bit him é-fy éina I found him
¢-4-pi-kuya he is biting him s-fwadé-na I feund them
INFLECTIONAL AFFIXES
Each inflectional affix is assigned an identification number and is a
member of a century class. Century classes are numbered according
to the relative order of occurrence of their members within transitive
verbs. An exception to this sequential numbering of century classes
is the case of classes 100 and 200 which are never represented in the
same verb. Members of both Century Class 100 and 200 are always
in initial position in the verb.
Century Class 100 includes all pronominal affixes. Within the
class are nine decade classes (100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170,
and 180), each of which includes affixes indicating a specific subject
or subject-object combination. Within each decade class, with the
exception of 180, there are six morphemes (numbered 101-106, 111-
116, etc.), each of which is characteristic of a specific mode. Century
4 These are termed ‘‘affixes”’ rather than specifically ‘‘prefixes’’ or ‘‘suffixes’’ because, although they occur
most commonly as prefixes, there are some intransitive verbs in which they occur as suffixes.
Ano 2 ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 79
Class 200 consists of one morpheme, the future tense affix. Century
Class 300 consists of voice prefixes. Century Class 400 consists of
aspect suffixes. Century Class 500 consists of number suffixes.
Century Class 600 consists of condition suffixes.
Affixes of Century Class 100 are tabulated in charts 1 and 2 and
comprise a set of pronominal indicators. Those affixes which occur
with transitive verbs in their primary paradigms appear in chart 1;
those occurring with intransitive verbs and with transitive verbs in
their secondary paradigms are listed in chart 2. The two charts
overlap to a considerable extent, as many forms appear both with
transitive and intransitive verbs. This overlap is so extensive that
it is convenient to group those pronominal indicators which occur with
intransitive verbs together with those which occur with transitive
verbs and which indicate first, second, or third person subject with
third person object. Affix 101, for instance, occurs with intransitive
verbs indicating first person subject and with transitive verbs indi-
cating first person subject with third person object. The difference
lies in the fact that there are more allomorphs of each affix affiliated
with intransitive verbs than with transitive verbs. The overlapping
decade classes appear in the two charts with the designations T or I
(e.g., 100T, 1001) indicating transitive or intransitive. The morpheme
membership of T and I decade classes are identical: both 100T and
1001, for example, consist of affixes 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106.
Decade Class 100I, however, includes many more allomorphs than
does Decade Class 100T.
Affixes of Century Class 100 form a rather elaborate system. With
few exceptions, there is a distinctive affix for each subject-object
combination within each of the three principal modes (indicative,
dubitative, and hortative). There is, in addition, a distinctive affix
for certain subject-object combinations within the negative and the
negative hortative modes. A sixth mode, the future hortative, is
indicated by affixes which, in most instances, are identical in form
with the corresponding dubitative, hortative, or negative hortative
affix. For purposes of description, the entire series is filled-in for
each of the six modes, although this results in assigning two numbers
to certain forms that, from one point of view at least, may be regarded
as the same affix (e.g., affixes 111 and 112, 121 and 122). Thus, there
are eight decade classes, each of which contains six morphemes
indicating the same subject-object combination, plus Decade Class
180 which consists of a single morpheme. Each of the six morphemes
within a decade class indicates a different mode. Within each mode
the final digit of the affix identification number remains constant.
Allomorphs of each pronominal affix are distinguished by upper
case letters following the identification number. All allomorphs listed
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
80
nQ q9gT ny geet ny CPS nQ Est nQ qZg nQ AIST
NsP VOGT ns WG¢T ns VFI NsP VEST NsP VST NsP WIGT
het. Spe OST
®) OFT 88 acrl eS APF Bo GePl eS ACPI BS GIFT
eZ VOT BS VOFI eS VPI BZ VEFI BS VZFI BS WIFI
PZ = ST. OFT
4 Esl 9 AZET 9? GIST
1d 9¢T 1d cet 1d FEI Ip VEST IZ VZEI 1Z WISI
pe Uy Ost
1d q9ZI 1d q¢ZI id qFZI Ip Cz 1Z ACSI 1Z GTZ
Id V9ZI td VEZI 1d VPI sP WEsl 3 VZGI 3 VIZI
pe pg LOZ
10 GOI Isp8 GGT 1 GFT 10 (SIT I$ (ZIT 1§ GTIT
9 V9IT 3S VSIT 9 VPIT 9 VEIT 8 VZIT 8 VIIT
pg PZ LOTT
tu q90T 1m SOT ey aPor 1 Gsol IsPS GZOT 1 G01
Iu V90T tu VOT BY VFOL 1 VOI 8S VZOI Is VIOT
pg ST LOOT
9ATBY1OY 9AT}RYIOY
ehaquhans DATPVSIN 9AI}C410 FT sAIVBYIGNG OAT}VSON aAryeorpuy | ‘fqg ‘fqng
SSBID
i aa) a. Gk eo ee ok ae he Le Ve. ee es SS S| = a oe ope apBo9q
opoyl uosieg
81
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 69]
subypoing fispuiig ay], UL squad aayrsunsy ypn burtunsoQ sory y pourmouo.g QOT ssvjQ fanjuag—] Lava
TPlP COLT 98 {GLI IP APLT | IPlsP ASAT | IES qZLT | Ipes ATLT
ZsP VOLT sP8 VGLT ZVPLI Z@sP VELT Ze3 VZLI ze3 VILT
PZ pg OLT
Tpeu q9OT | Ipeuggor | peu gPFOT Tpe} GSor 28 {ZI nyAs {OT
zeu VO9T zeu VG9T zeu VFO 204 VE9T sP8S VZ9T 3S VIO
SI =—pe O9T
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
82
9 O9IT
1 Goll
9 VOLT
tpeu FOOT
peu 901
zeu A9OT
elt HOOT
a 901
U 9901
1m q90T
td Y90OI
9AT}B110Y
oingn iy
AS OSII
IspS (SII
9S VGIT
48 OGOT
FS dO
IS OSOT
§ NSOT
§ WS0I
Tpeu 'TSOT
peu SGOT
zeu GOT
Ja TSOT
U HOLT
u HOI
6PA ASOT
4 ASOT
ey GS0T
BY OGOl
1 @SOr
tu VGOI
OAIYB4.10Y
9AT}BS9 NT
} OFIT JOST
Id qPIT 10 GIT
d VFIl 9 VEIT
138 OFOT
6148 dé01
48 OFOT
§ NFOT
§ WHO
Ipeu THOT
peu SFOT
zeu (FOI
g}U IFOT
a HOT 413 HESOT
U OFOT Tpe} OEOI
1 AFOT pe? ASOT
TU WFOT Ze} ASOL
6°41 GFOL 684 AS01
X OFOL 4 O801
BY APOr 1) G@E0r
BY VFOL 1} VEOI
DATPLPIOFZ | IArTzeyqng
opoy
8 Ozll
1 QZII
8 VZII
98 Z0T
128 IZOT
28 HZOL
sPS YZ0T
6°48 AZOT
BSS HZOT
4S AZOT
AS OZOL
IsPS {Z0T
8S VZOT
8 OLIT
I$ @III
8 VIII
NYS (TOT
5S TIOT
pes HIOT
ZeS OTOL
438 ATOT
1S AIOT
$ CIOT
8 OLOL
19 QO
IS VIOT
83
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 69]
swbypoivg hinpuosagy ay], UL sian aarpsuDiy, pup aapsun4uy yn bursinaQ saxyfy Jourmouorg OOT ssvjp hunjuag—'z% LAVHO
28 (IST
28 OI8T
4S €18t
98 VISTI
oyrayopuy
eid OOZT
eed F9ST
ed MOST
d q9zt
d 0921
id q9Zt
Id V9ZT
IPlaP OIIT
PlaP A9TT
ZesPp HOTT
289 GOTT
4 (EST 9 (ZZ
1) IZ 19 1221
4 Hes 9 Hze1
ed OSZT eid OFZ P O&ZI Z OTS
od TSZT eed APE 6P2 ASS oP AST
ed Wes ed WPZI BaP ASST v8 ACSI
d asa d ara 2 CEZI marca
d OgzI d OFZI 2 O&ZI HOSEL
1d qGZI id qPzI IP A&Z1 IZ ZS
1d VGZI Id V¥ZI sP VEZI 3 VZZI
98 (SIT
128 IGTT
28 HTT Bish
sP8 OGTT IP OPIT | IPlkPOSIT | tes OZIT
oBAS ASTI P AFIT PleP ASTT pes AIT
ees ASTI ZAUPIT | 2sP WSIT ze3 SIT
AS (SIT QdrIT | ed Gert § dZII
2 £TZT
19 ITZT
9? HIZI
ZOIZI
6? AISI
8 HIZI
Y AIZI
YT. OLE
1Z GIZl
3 VIZI
Tpes OTIT
pes AIT
ze3 WITT
§ CIIT
PE
I 02T
84 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
in the charts are morphologically defined, i.e., their occurrence cannot
be predicted in terms of phonological environment. Phonologically -
defined allomorphs (e.g., gtiz derived by morphophonemic vowel
assimilation from géz) are not listed in the charts but may be predicted
from the morphophonemic processes described under ‘‘Morpho-
phonemics.”’
The same upper case letters have been used to identify allomorphs
which tend to be affiliated with the same group of verbs. This
consistency is especially evident in transitive verbs and within each
decade class:
éi-ziwa (101B-+verb stem) I paid him
sdvi-ziwa (102B+verb stem) TI (didn’t) pay him
ti-ziwa (103B-+verb stem) maybe I paid him
etc.
This tendency also is manifested to a lesser degree from one decade
class to another within each mode:
éi-ziwa (101B+verb stem) J paid him
Si-ziwa (111B+verb stem) you paid him
zi-zawa (121B+verb stem) he paid him
etc.
The fact that not all affixes have the same number of allomorphs,
makes it obvious that this tendency cannot hold true in the case
of every verb. Intransitive verbs, especially, often show a shift from
one series of allomorphs to another even within the same decade class:
sdz4-?abe (101G+-verb stem) we two ate
sgd-?abe? (102A+verb stem) we two (didn’t) eat
tdz4-?abe (103E+verb stem) maybe we two ate
etc.
The phonetic shape and distribution of many affixes of Century
Class 100 is suggestive of certain historical processes. It is probable
that many of the B-allomorphs were derived from the corresponding
A-allomorphs either through glottalization (compare 141B with 141A,
for example) or through palatalization (compare 111B with 111A).
B-allomorphs that appear to be a palatalized form of the corresponding
A-allomorphs nearly always occur with verb stems beginning in -i-.
The few exceptions prevent the phenomenon from being described as a
morphophonemic process.
Another type of historical development is suggested by the
overlap in phonetic form of certain allomorphs of affixes belonging to
different decade classes. This overlap is evident when one compares
affixes of Decade Class 100I with those of 160, affixes of Decade Class
1101 with those of 170, and affixes of Decade Class 120 with those of 130.
This suggests that the system of pronominal affixation may have
Anthrop. 3
No oT 2 «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 85
developed from one in which intransitive subject and transitive object
were equated.
Century Class 200 is comprised of a single morpheme which indi-
cates future tense. It replaces affixes of Century Class 100 as to
position in the verb but not as to function. The future tense affix
includes the following allomorphs:
201A n
201B_ oni
201C n
201D_ ni
201E ni?
201F nédz
201G_ néd
201H néddi
Examples of allomorphs of affix 201 are as follows:
n-UpE will eat
ni-ukaéa will see
n-auta will kill
ni-udi? will give
nikupawane- (nfi?- + -fkupawane-) will chop (plural subject)
ndz-4-? abe? will eat (dual subject)
ndd-a? will be
nédiubu-cr will be frightened
Century Class 300 contains two morphemes, 301 and 302, which
function as voice indicators and occur prefixed to transitive verbs
following the pronominal prefix.
Affix 301 expresses reflexive or reciprocal action with the single
allomorph 301 -a-. Affix 302 indicates passive voice and includes two
allomorphs: 302A -4?a- and 302B -a-. The following examples
illustrate the affixes of Century Class 300:
$-a-ukaéa I saw myself
sk-4?4-iziwa-ne I was paid
sk-a-d¥a?ta I was caught
Century Class 400 is comprised of three morphemes, 401, 402, and
403, which function as aspect indicators and (except for 401H) are
suffixed to verb stems.
Affix 401 indicates continuative action and includes the following
allomorphs:
401A -kuya
401B -nikuya
401C_ -tikuya
401D -ku
AQIE -(i)ta(-)
401F -sa
401G_ -éadyaya
401H reduplication of the verb core
86 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The following examples illustrate occurrences of allomorphs of
affix 401:
subeu-kuya I am eating
gukaéa-nikuya he is looking at him
cidya?-tikuya I am catching him
kéiskd-?azai-ku he is turning around
sfukaicr-ta I am hitting him
sduti-sa I am planting
kA-ni-tadvaya he is walking
wéko-woke-ka it is shaking
Associated with allomorph 401K, -(i)ta, is a change from -a or -a
to -i or -I in the stem-final vowel of the verb to which it is suffixed.
Compares siukaica J hit him with siukéicita Iam hitting him. Affix
402, which refers to unfulfilled action, contains the following allo-
morphs:
402A -nx(-)
402B -nx(-)
402C -wer
Illustrations of the occurrence of allomorphs of affix 402 are as follows:
C{-zawa-nE I came to pay him
sfukaéa-nE I came to see him
SUDE-WE I came to eat
Affix 403 expresses remote state and has the single allomorph,403 -ma;:
gé-ta--ma it is full (something remote)
Century class 500 contains two morphemes, 501 and 502, which
express subject number. They are suflixed either directly to the verb
stem or follow affixes of Century Class 400. Affix 501 indicates dual
subject and includes the following allomorphs:
501A -na 501E -moti
501B -notr(-) 501F -rhasutr
501C_ -dz 501G@_-sutr
501D -mha 501H -pa
The occurrence of these allomorphs is illustrated by the following
examples:
sikupawa-na we two chopped sdiské-?a zai-moti we two turned around
Siukaéa-noati we two saw him siuni-masuti we two know him
$idya?-dy¥1 we two caught him sddé-?E-sut1 we two are
sdudi-ma we two planted siwi-deya-pa we two worshipped
Affix 502, expressing plural subject, has the following allomorphs:
502A -nx(-) 502H -wsE
502B -nx(-) 5021 = -8n(-)
502C_ -ta(-) 502J = -81
502D -mzr 502K -?E
502E -msr 502L -(i)ya
502F -masa 502M _ -sx(-)
502G -wa
Anthrop.,Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 87
Examples of the allomorphs of affix 502 are as follows:
sikupawa-nE we chopped siwi-deya-wa we worshiped
sfukaGéa-nE we saw him 24?4-+A-wE they opened it
$idva?-ta we caught him ~=stwad¥ima-SE our brother
s4w4-di-mE we planted Z6?6-bai?-s1 we went to sleep
sdy4-ské-?azai-mE we turned around sawawane-?E we hunted
$funi-rhasa we know him Si-ziwi-ti-ya we are paying him
Sfukaéaniguya-sE we are looking at him
Century Class 600 is comprised of three morphemes, 601, 602, and
603, which express conditional or contrary-to-fact action. Affix 601
has two allomorphs, 601A -ne and 601B -de. Affix 602 has a single
allomorph, 602 -nu-. Affix 603 likewise has a single allomorph,
603 -tr. The following examples illustrate the occurrence of these
allomorphs:
skiiztiwa--ne when he paid me
gikaéane--de when they saw him
skiiziwa--nu- if he pays me
It is difficult to differentiate affixes 601 and 602 by meaning function
except that the latter apparently has a dubitative connotation
lacking in the former. Affix 603 occurs with many verbs in the nega-
tive mode which have a plural subject:
sgukaéane--tE we (didn’t) see him
DISTRIBUTION OF AFFIXES
The distribution within verbs of the inflectional affixes, the thematic
adjunct (TA), the verb core, and the benefactive suffix (B) serves to
distinguish three major structural types. These are represented by
three formulas:
1. TV=+100+300+ TA+ Core+ 400+ B+ 500+ 600/
+ 200+ 300+ TA-+ Core+ 400+ B+ 500
Transitive verbs are composed of three obligatory parts, a prefix of
either Century Class 100 or Century Class 200 followed by a thematic
adjunct and a verb core. Prefixes of Century Class 300 and suffixes
of Century Classes 400, 500, and 600 as well as the benefactive suffix
occur in some, but not all, verbs of this type. Suffixes of Century
Class 600 may occur only if the verb is prefixed by members of Century
Class 100.
2. IVA=+100+ TA-+ Core+ 400+ 500 + 600/
+ 200+ TA+ Core+ 400+ 500
Intransitive verbs of Type A are composed of at least a prefix of
either Century Class 100 or Century Class 200 followed by a thematic
adjunct and a verb core. They may include, in addition, suffixes of
Century Classes 400, 500, or 600.
3. IVB=-+ Core+ 400+ 100+ TA+ 600/
+ Core+ 400+ 200+ TA
682-611—6410
88 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Intransitive verbs of Type B are composed of a verb core together
with an affix of either Century Class 100 or 200 occurring as a suffix
and followed by a thematic adjunct. An affix of Century Class 400
may follow the core and, in forms containing a member of Century
Class 100, a suffix of Century Class 600 may follow the thematic
adjunct.
A complete set of paradigms of transitive verbs in all of their
possible inflections includes the following:
Primary paradigms.—Transitive verbs in their simplest forms,
i.e., those which include only the three obligatory elements and which
have unexpanded thematic adjuncts, are members of one of the
primary paradigms. A transitive verb primary paradigm is composed
of seven or eight forms based on the same verb stem, all belonging
to the same mode, and each expressing a different pronominal
reference. Examples of these paradigms are given in Appendix 1.
The classification of verb stems on the basis of the specific allomorphs
of Century Class 100 with which they occur in their primary paradigms
is dealt with under ‘‘Verb Classes.”’
Forms with prefixes of Century Class 300.—Transitive verbs occurring
with the reflexive-reciprocal or the passive voice prefix take distinc-
tive sets of allomorphs of the pronominal prefixes. Furthermore,
the class division evident in the primary paradigms is lacking in these
forms; all transitive verbs take the same sets of allomorphs.
Verbs in the reflexive-reciprocal voice occur with the following set
of pronominal allomorphs:
$ sk4? ta? k&? n n
101D 102F 103D 104D 105H 106D
R § ca? é ska? ca?
111D 112D 113D 114D 115F 116D
k4? ka? cA? pa? pa? pa?
121F 122F 123F 124F 125F 126F
Those in the passive voice occur with the following:
sku sé ti ni ni ni
101J 102H 103B 104E 105A 106A
§ iS c Z sé Cc
111C 112C 113C 114E 115H 116C
é é é pi pi i
121H 122H 123H 124B 125B 126B
Verbs in the passive voice regularly take the plural subject suffix:
sk-4?4-iztiwa--ne (101J+302A+stem+502A) I was paid
An alternative translation of this verb would be they (certain unspec-
ified persons) paid me. ‘This translation is consistent with the pres-
ence of the plural subject suffix and with the expansion of the thematic
adjunct in forms indicating dual or plural persons being acted upon.
a Le LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 89
It is not consistent, however, with the presence of pronominal affixes
of Decade Classes 1001, 110I, and 1201, which express first, second,
and third person subject respectively.
The occurrence of allomorph 302B, -a-, as opposed to 302A, -4?a-,
is apparently restricted to verbs having a voiceless and unglottalized
core-initial consonant and a normally short and level accented
thematic adjunct:
cidvawa I stabbed him
skady4wanr I was stabbed
Forms with suffixes of Century Class 400.—Most transitive verb
stems may occur with suffix 401, indicating continuous action. These
forms occur with the same pronominal prefixes as occur in the primary
paradigms:
gtkaéanikuya (121A+stem+401B) he ts looking at him
Compare:
gukaéa (121A+stem) he saw him
Subclasses of transitive verbs are based in part on their occurrence
with specific allomorphs of 401 (see ‘‘Verb Classes’’). A few transitive
verbs are defective in that they never occur with affix 401. The
occurrence of affix 402 is quite limited and has been recorded in
relatively few verbs. ‘The subclass to which the verb belongs deter-
mines which of the several allomorphs occur. There are no occur-
rences in the present data of transitive verbs which include affix 403.
Forms with suffixes of Century Class 500.—AlII transitive verbs, with
the exception of a few defective stems, may occur with a subject
number suffix, 501 or 502. In general, the same sets of allomorphs
of Century Class 100 occur with these forms as occur in the primary
paradigms:
gukaéanoti (121A+stem+501B) they two saw him
gukaéane (121A+stem+502B) they saw him
Compare:
gukaéa (121A+stem) he saw him
Forms expressing first person subject and third person object, how-
ever, are an exception. Verbs which in their primary paradigms occur
with A-allomorphs of Decade Class 100 (101A, 102A, 103A, etc.)
take allomorphs 101K, 102A, 103H, 104F, 105B, and 106B when the
subject is dual or plural. Those with B-allomorphs in their primary
paradigms occur with allomorphs 101E, 102B, 103H, 104F, 105B, and
106B in the dual and plural forms:
SiukaéanE (101E+stem+502B) we saw him
Si-ziwa-nE (101K-+stem+502A) we paid him
Compare:
sfukaéa (101A+stem) J saw him
éi-ziwa (101B+stem) I paid him
90 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The choice of allomorphs of suffixes 501 and 502 depends on the sub-
class to which the transitive verb belongs and on the presence or
absence of affixes of Century Classes 200 and 400. The occurrence
of these allomorphs is described more fully under ‘‘Verb Classes.”’
Forms with suffixes of Century Class 600—Suffixes 601 and 602,
in general, may be attached to any transitive verb in the non-future
tense. This involves no concomitant changes in the allomorphs of
other affixes which are present in the verb:
sktiztiwa-ne (161B+stem+601A) when he paid me
sktiziwa-nu- (161B-+stem+602) if he pays me
Compare:
skiiziwa (161B+stem) he paid me
Allomorph 601B rather than 601A occurs with verbs in which the
subject is dual or plural:
sktiztiwa-ne-de (161B-++stem+502A+601B) when they paid me
Affix 603 is of much more limited distribution, occurring only in verbs
with plural subject in the negative mode when other Century Class
600 suffixes are absent:
sgukaéane-te (102A-+stem+502B+603) we (didn’t) see him
Forms with prefix 201.—All forms of transitive verbs outlined above,
with the exception of those containing suffixes of Century Class 600,
may be changed to the future tense by replacing the pronominal
prefix with prefix 201. This results in a form of the verb that does not
include subject-object person and which must be followed by a verbal
auxiliary. ‘Transitive verbs which occur with allomorph 101A in
forms indicating first person subject with third person object take
allomorph 201B in most future tense forms:
sfukaéa (101A+stem) TJ saw him
niukaéa (201B+stem) will see
Those verbs which occur with allomorph 101B take allomorph 201D:
ci-ziwa (101B+stem) TI paid him
ni-ziwa (201D+stem) will pay
Future tense verbs in the reflexive voice, however, occur with allo-
morph 201C rather than 201B or 201D:
naukaéa (201C+stem) will see oneself
The presence of affix 201 sometimes determines the choice of allo-
morphs of suffixes 501 and 502. Some verbs in the future tense take
the same allomorph of a number suffix as do the corresponding non-
future forms:
ni-ziwa-na (201D+stem+501A) will pay (dual subject)
Anturop.jaP- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 91
Compare:
ai-ziwa-na (121B+stem+501A) they two paid him
Verbsoccurring with allomorphs 502A, 502B, or 502C in the non-future
tense show a lengthening and voicing of the suffix vowel in the future
tense:
zi-ziwa-NE (121B+stem+502A) they paid him
ni-ziwa-ne- (201D+stem+502A) will pay him (plural subject)
Chart 3 summarizes all possible sequences of inflectional affixes
representative of the six century classes and illustrates them with
examples based on the verb to see. For each of the non-future forms
in the chart there are parallel forms representing other modes and other
subject-object persons, as well as forms incorporating other affixes of
Century Classes 300, 400, 500, and 600. The multiplicity of forms
based on a single verb core is further increased by the possibility of
changes in the thematic adjunct and/or the inclusion of a benefactive
suffix. These, however, are regarded as stem changes rather than
inflection and are treated in that portion entitled ‘Stem Formation.”
Type A intransitive verbs follow the same general pattern of
inflection as transitive verbs, but occur with a more restricted in-
ventory or inflectional affixes. These verbs, for example, never occur
with affixes of Century Class 100 which express first person object
(i.e., Decade Classes 150 and 160). Furthermore, specific intransitive
verbs commonly lack the capacity for combining with affixes of one
or more of the optionally occurring classes; few intransitive verbs
exhibit the full pattern of inflection indicated for transitive verbs in
chart 3. Affixes of Century Class 300, for instance, rarely occur with
intransitive verbs. There are a few verbs, however, which are classi-
fied as intransitive on structural grounds, but which have a transitive
meaning and which admit affixes of this class:
sk4?AutawA (101J+302A+stem+502G) I was killed
Members of Century Classes 400 and/or 500 may likewise be lacking
in the inventory of inflectional affixes with which specific Type A
intransitive verb stems occur. Certain of these verbs have no
distinctive continuative action forms, while others indicate dual and
plural subject by changes in the stem rather than by inflection.
Type B intransitive verbs are even more restricted in their inflection
than are Type A. They never occur with affixes of Century Class 500,
and the expression of aspect is limited to the reduplication of the verb
core to indicate continuative action (allomorph 401H):
wokoka at moved
wékowokoka it is shaking
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
92
fjasmry saas ay fu -nUu-8QgVyN-R-, By
009 +S +00€ + 00T
uly saas ay fr -nu-BQVyN-s
009+S+00T
SaMasway) aas [JIM =—-ou-"VQaVHN-R-T
00¢+S+00€ +002
sayasmay, mos hay, AU-V2VYN-V-, BH
00¢-+S+00€ + 00T
(alqns younjd) aas yim = -eUu-BQVYyN-1U
00S +8 +002
wry os fayg amu-vavyn-3
00$+S+00T
fjasauo aas y7Im = VQVYN-8-T
S+00€ +002
fJasury MDs ay VQVAN-R-.BY
S+00€+00T
gas 12M =vQvyN-lU
S+002
Uy NDS ay VAVYN-3
S+00T
fasauo
70 Buryoo) aq jem VAOYTU-eQVyN-e-T
00% +S +00€ +002
fyasmry
70 Guzyoo) sz ay vANTU-eQVvyN-R-.BH
00% +S +008 + 00T
Bburyoo) aq 7m = VAN YIU-eQVvyN-Ju
00F +S +002
uy yo Buryoo) si ay vANYIU-eQvyn-3
00% +S +00T
93
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 69]
sanuanbay way ssp7p fiunjuag—e LAVHO
w2y yo buryoo) aup hay, uayn
saajas
-W9ay} aas fay) uayM = oap--eU-BQVYN-V-, BY
009 + 00S +S +00€ + 00T
wy aas fiay2 wayN oap--du-eaVyN-3
009 +00¢+S8+00T
saqjasway}
yo Buryoo) aun fiayg waym op--as-eANSTuU-eQVyN-v-. By
009 + 00S + 00% +S+00€+00T
op--as-vANSIU-vOVYyN-S
009 +-00¢ + 00% +S+001
fasuyy yo
“NU-BANSIU-BIV YN-C-, BY
009 + 00% +S+00€ +001
buryoo) 2 ay fr
EY
nu-vANSIU-eoVyN-3
009+ 00h +S+00T
0 Buzyoo) sz ay fr
saqasway}
yo butyoo) aq 2M = as-BAnSTU-BQVyN-e-U
00¢ +00%+S+008+002
saajasway? 70
@s-BANSIU-VQV yN-V-. BY
00¢+00F+S+008+00T
(qoalqns 7nunjd)
Buryoo) aun fiayy
buryoo) aq qm as-eAnstu-vgvyn-ju
00S + 00F +8 +002
OLE
yo buryoo) asp fiayg as-eknstu-eQvyn-s
00¢+00F+S+00T
94 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
A few Type B intransitive verbs always occur with -n1 in word-final
position. This morpheme cannot be assigned a meaning function
and does not fit in any of the classes of inflectional affixes:
ké-gant it is red
ké-sent Iam red
There is a tendency for words beginning in g-, k- or k- to develop by
analogy a set of inflectional affixes even though the word may not
originally have been a verb. This may be seen in the word gasi-k1
cacique borrowed from the Spanish. The initial g- no ionger behaves
like a part of the stem but is identified with the third person prefix
and may be replaced by other pronominal or future tense affixes:
sesi-kr JI am a cacique
nesi-k1 will be a cacique
Some words have an indicative and a dubitative form but never
occur with the future tense prefix or any other inflectional affix:
DA a
kt-ti mowntain
3 .
Cu-ti there may be a mountain
The potentiality for occurring with a future tense prefix is taken
as a necessary condition for membership in the verb class. Mountain,
therefore, is not a verb, but is classified as an uninflected word which
exhibits two alternate forms.
VERB STEMS
Verbs are analyzed as consisting of a stem plus inflectional affixes
of the various classes previously described. The stem itself is analyzed
as consisting of two obligatory components, a thematic adjunct and a
core, and may include a benefactive suffix as well. The combination
of these elements to form verb stems is described in the section to
follow. Certain verb cores, in turn, may be analyzed further. These
will be described under ‘‘Verb Core Derivation.”
STEM FORMATION
The thematic adjunct (abbreviated TA) is an element of the verb
occurring, in most cases, immediately preceding the core (i.e., it is
the initial element of the verb stem). The verb zinata he bought it,
for example, may be dissected as follows:
pronominal
prefix
Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 95
In those verbs in which the pronominal affix follows the core the
thematic adjunct is the element immediately following the pronominal
affix:
zu-k-u (core+ pronominal affix+TA) he went
The stem in such cases, as zi—v in the above example, is discontinuous.
Thematic adjuncts occurring in transitive verbs are either simple,
indicating singular object, or expanded to indicate dual or plural
object. Simple thematic adjuncts in transitive verbs are most
commonly single vowels, either short or long:
g-ti-ni he knows him
dy-u-di you gave it to me
é-{--ziwa I paid him
A few transitive verbs occur with vowel clusters as simple thematic
adjuncts:
g-ai-ki-mi I brought it to you
$-4u-?0 I gave it to you
A particular transitive verb ordinarily retains the same thematic
adjunct throughout its primary paradigms (see Appendix 1). Fre-
quently, however, there is a different thematic adjunct in the passive
voice (see “Stem Variants”’).
To indicate dual or plural object, the thematic adjunct of transitive
verbs is expanded according to a pattern that is regular but not
analyzable in terms of additive morphemes. Chart 4 lists simple
transitive thematic adjuncts together with their dual and plural
expanded forms. With the simple thematic adjuncts are vowels or
vowel clusters which result from a combination of the final vowel of a
preceding prefix together with the thematic adjunct. This includes,
for instance, -e- resulting from a combination of -i- plus -a- and -au-
resulting from a combination of -a- and -u-. Only those vowels and
vowel clusters are given which have actually been recorded in transi-
tive verbs. This accounts for the omission from the chart of many
vowels and vowel combinations that might be expected to occur.
Thematic adjuncts and their expansions are listed in the chart by
types based on the forms which appear in the primary paradigms and
in the passive voice respectively. Type u/a, for example, has refer-
ence to verbs which exhibit -u- as thematic adjunct in their primary
paradigms and -a- in the passive voice. The expansion of these
adjuncts involves a radical change in the accent pattern only in the
case of those which in their simple form are short and level accented.
These are grouped together in a separate section of the chart. In
other verbs the accent of the simple thematic adjunct is retained on
06 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
the final vowel or vowel cluster of the expanded forms, while the
initial syllable receives a level accent. Vowel length occurring with a
simple thematic adjunct likewise is retained on the final vowel of the
expanded forms.
Dual Plural
Type Simple Expanded Expanded
-diya-
~siya-
diya
-iwa-
-duwa-
-fuwa-
-4°dwa-
Short level
J
-alya-
-eiya-
-aiyai-
-eiyai-
-aiyau-
-eiyau-
-aiya-
-alya-
-aiya-
-U-Wwa-
-auwa-
-iuwa-
-auwa-
~
c
o
oO
o
Tas)
ca
q
~~
3
o
=
Yo!
=
°
oo
q
—
a
ee
=
o
>
2
0
a
}
|
-aiwa-
-aiwa-
-aiwa-
Cuart 4.—EHxpansion of Thematic Adjuncts
97
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 69]
way? 02 92 aanb noh
710 Noh 07 92 aanb 7
Sn 07 72 aanb noh
gy asam an
MOU ey.
119 nok yy T
UOURT 24
sn prod noh
110 nok prod 7
way, prod noh
Way? 07 70 aaDB T
710 nok 07 7t aanb 7
way? 07 72 7ybN0uQ JT
710 nok 07 7 qybnoug JT
Maye aT
may? 719 noh
payo1y alam an
Way? PIyoty ay
110 nok payory J
Way? PayIry ay
sn qy6nv9 noh
110 nok qybno09 J
way? 1y6nv9 noh
TPRATES
TPRATBS
IPEAIG
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 99
Allomorph -mi correlates in a similar fashion with 502E and 502K;
-rhi, correlates with 502D; -dimmi with 502C; and -wi with 502G and
502H:
siwanE I went hunting cidya I caught it
siwawane’E we went hunting sidva?ta we caught it
séwanemi I went hunting for you SAud¥a?dimi TI caught it for you
sdudi I planted 244-ba he opened it
g4w4-dithr we planted zA?4-tawE they opened it
éiudimi I planted for him §4?4-tawi I opened it for you
Examples showing a correlation of benefactive suffixes with 502F,
5021, 5023, 5021, 502M, and 502N are lacking in the data. Posi-
tionally, the benefactive suffix occurs between suffixes of Century
Class 400 and Century Class 500. In forms containing a suffix of
Century Class 400 the stem is thus discontinuous:
§dukaicrta-ni (141B + TA + verb core + 401E + benefactive suffix, -ni)
I am hitting him for you
STEM VARIANTS
Stem variants result primarily from changes in the thematic adjunct
and from changes in the final syllable of the verb stem, although
other syllables may occasionally be involved as well. Certain of these
changes are irregular and must be indicated in a listing of stems.
Others, however, may be predicted on the basis of previously described
processes which show a certain degree of regularity. The latter result
from specific morphophonemic processes, from the expansion of transi-
tive verb thematic adjuncts and the change in the thematic adjunct of
intransitive verbs of classes 9-11 and 9-12, (‘Stem Formation’’), and
from the suffixation of affix 401E or 502L (“Inflectional Affixes”’).
Vowel reduction normally results in the fusing of the thematic
adjunct with a preceding vowel. Stem variants will then show either
a shift in, or a loss of, the initial (thematic adjunct) vowel, depending
on how the prefix-stem cut is made:
g-aku (g- + -aku) he bit him
$-aku or $a-ku (Sa- + -Aku) I bit you
s-éku or sé-ku (si- + -Aku) I bit him
The morphophonemic reduction of vowel plus semivowel sequences
resuits in similar stem changes:
g-iwi-teya (g- + -twt-tEya) he worshiped
si-wi-tnya (si- + -twi-tEyAa) I worshiped
g-tistkuya (g- + -iwiSikuya) he scolded him
si-wiStkuya (si- + -GwiStkuya) I scolded him
100 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Morphophonemic processes involved in suffixation, too, often
result in regular stem changes:
g-ukaéa (g- + -tkaéa) he saw him
g-0kaéa-nikuya (g- + -dkaéa + -nikuya) he is looking at him
g-UpE (g- + -upE) he ate
g-ubeu-kuya (g- + -upE + -kuya) he is eating
s-Gwi-ca (s- + -tiwi-ca) I made it
s-wi-ti-ta (s- + -twi-ca + -(i)ta) I am making it
Stem variants may result from regular changes which do not
involve morphophonemic processes. The most common of these is
the expansion of the thematic adjunct to indicate dual or plural object
of transitive verbs. This kind of change is regarded as stem change
rather than inflection because (1) the changes are of such a nature that
no additive morpheme can be isolated, and (2) it parallels in many
ways the kind of irregular change which takes place in certain in-
transitive verb stems in the dual and plural as compared with the
singular forms. The expansion of thematic adjuncts in transitive
verbs has been described in ‘Stem Formation” and examples given.
The regular change from -au- to -u- in the second person horta-
tive forms of Class 9-11 and 9-12 intransitive verbs likewise produces
stem variants:
s-dudi I planted
é-udi plant it
The change to -i or -1 of a stem-final -a or -a preceding allomorph
-ta of the continuative action suffix and before allomorph -ya of
the plural subject suffix was noted in “Inflectional Affixes”’:
ef-ziwa (@i- + -f-zGwa) I paid him
Ci-ziwi--ta (¢ci- + -fi-ziwa + -ta) Iam paying him
Changes which are irregular and which must be indicated in stem
listing are of the following types:
1. Changes in intransitive verb stems in the dual and in the plural
as compared to the singular—Dual and plural forms of intransitive
verbs, except for a relatively few which exhibit stem suppletion, are
clearly related to the singular forms. The changes in the stem,
however, are highly irregular:
g-ama he left
g-0-mha they two left
z-é6-na they left
k-UpE he ate
g-d-? abe they two ate
g-4-?apE they ate
k-Ut4-nica he worked
g-Uta-niza-ng
g-awataé-niza-nE
they two worked
they worked
an 601» ~LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 101
Because of this irregularity, intransitive verb stems are listed sep-
arately for the singular, dual, and plural.
2. Accentual changes and the alternation between voiced and voiceless
vowels in verb stems of the same number.—In some verbs the thematic
adjunct alternates from a short accented vowel in most forms to a
voiceless vowel in forms prefixed by pronominal morphemes of the
shape CVC-:
8-étidya my back
gdéc-atidya your back
Verbs of this type also may show a shift to a voiceless vowel in the
verb core if the core is monosyllabic and normally contains a voiced
vowel:
$-Adv4 my animal
géc-adyA your animal
Verb stems which exhibit this type of alternation are listed with the
thematic adjunct accent in parentheses:
-Atidya back
~“2avd to possess an animal
A few verb stems have a distinctive form which occurs only following
prefixes composed of a consonant plus -i-. This form of the stem is
characterized by a breathy accent on the thematic adjunct and by a
final voiceless vowel:
sidvya (si- + -idya) JI descended sika (si- + -ika) TI looked
gddva (g- + -ddya) he descended zigd (z- + -igd) he looked
These stems are listed thus:
-fg4 (-ika) to look
Some transitive verbs normally characterized by a breathy accent
in the thematic adjunct take a level accent in those forms of the
primary paradigms in which a vowel cluster results from prefixation:
g-tkaéa he saw him
si-ukaéa TI saw him
Stems that exhibit this type of change are listed with the following
notation:
-tkata (-vv-) to see
A few type B intransitive verbs show a shift from a breathy to a falling
accent when the core is followed by -n-:
zu-ku he went
zQ--ne will go
These are listed in the following manner:
zu--U (zi-n-) to go
£02 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
3. Shifts in the thematic adjunct vowel of transitive verbs in the passive
voice.—Some verbs that normally occur with -u- as the thematic
adjunct show a shift to -a- in the passive voice:
sg-t-kaica he hit me
sk4?-4-kaizane I was hit
This change cannot be predicted from the phonetic content of the
stem nor from its class membership, and is indicated as follows in
stem listings:
-t-/4-kaica to hit
4. The change from a glottalized to a plain sonorant in the initial
stem consonant.—Stems which are based on cores normally beginning
with a glottalized sonorant sometimes show a shift to a plain sonorant
in forms prefixed by a glottalized consonant. Other verbs, however,
retain the glottalized sonorant:
s-Uwank you hunted gbz-8-w1 your child
é-GwanE hunt k-4-w1 his child
Those stems which exhibit this type of change are indicated thus:
-tiw/wanE to hunt
5. The lengthening of a stem-final vowel_—In “‘Voicing’’ it was noted
that some vowels which are normally voiceless become voiced and
long when followed by a suffix. This lengthening is characteristic
of some, but not all, stem-final vowels:
éf-zawa I paid him cidy4wa I stabbed him
Siziwa-NE we paid him cidydwanE we stabbed him
Vowels which undergo this type of lengthening are followed by a
vowel length symbol in parentheses in stem listings:
-{-ziwa(-) to pay
6. The introduction of a glottal stop after the stem-final vowel—Some
verb stems are characterized in certain forms by the introduction of a
glottal stop following the stem-final vowel. The glottal stop appears
regularly, in forms without suffixes, in the negative mode and in the
future tense:
zidya he caught him
ZAzi Zidya? he didn’t catch him
nidya? will catch
In some of these verbs the glottal stop also appears in all forms
containing suffixes, together with the rearticulation of the stem-final
vowel if the suffix begins with a sonorant:
zidi-Sa he fed him
zidi-Sa?-ta he is feeding him
zidi-Sa’a-nE they fed him
Anthrop.jj 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 103
These verbs are listed thus:
-fdi-Sa(?) to feed
Other verbs show the glottal stop in word-final position but not in
forms containing a suffix:
zi-badyu he awoke him
ni-bddyu? will awaken
zi-badyusa he is awaking him
Verbs of this type are listed with the glottal stop in double parentheses:
-{-bddyu((?)) to awaken
There is at least one verb in the data which contains a final glottal
stop in the negative mode and future tense, and retains the glottal
stop with vowel rearticulation when followed by a suffix beginning
with a sonorant, but which shows a lengthening of the stem-final
vowel and no glottal stop when followed by other suffixes:
gube he told him gube’e-nn- they told him
z&zi gube? he didn’t tell him gtbe--ta he is telling him
This verb is listed as follows:
-ube(-?) ¢o tell
7. The voicing of a final vowel or vowel-consonant sequence.—The
future tense of some verbs is characterized by the voicing of certain
segments which are voiceless in other forms. This usually involves
vowel clusters or sequences of the type -kuya:
Gik ar he lay down sddekuya I did it
higai will lie down nédéguya will do
These stems are listed in this manner:
-ikar (fut. -igai) to lie down
-ékuya (fut. -éguya) to do
8. The retention of aspirated stops under conditions 1n which un-
aspirated stops normally appear.—Stops which are aspirated preceding
voiceless vowels normally become unaspirated if the vowelis voiced. A
few stems and suffixes, however, retain aspirated stops in all environ-
ments:
ZikUPAWA he chopped
zikupawanE they chopped
Stops which remain aspirated before voiced vowels are underlined in
the listing of stems:
-ikupawa to chop
VERB CORE DERIVATION
The verb core is the element which, together with the thematic
adjunct, normally comprises the verb stem. The verb core may be a
single morpheme and often consists of one or two syllables:
-sti to give a liquid -kaca_ to see
-pE to eat -tiSa to speak to
c4-- to breathe -nata to buy
682—611—-64——-11
104 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Some two-syllable cores and most, if not all, polysyllabic cores
show evidence of being derived from simpler forms. However, very
few derivational affixes which are still productive can be identified.
The majority of polysyllabic verb cores are suspected of being derived
for one of the following reasons:
(1) They include sequences of phonemes which recur with great
frequency in verb cores, although such sequences cannot be correlated
with any common semantic feature. For example:
a. -WA in
-CAYAWA to be angry
-78-CUWA to awaken
-kUpAWA to chop
b. -ya in
-wi-tEyA to worship
-yucEyA to carry
-wACASAYA to stir
c. -mI in
-witu-nirht to care for
-disduwim to be sticky
-stid’yinam1 to sweat
d. -kuya in
-za?anikuya to preach
-nikuya to bathe
-tikuya to cry
-wisikuyA to scold
(2) They include sequences of phonemes which occur in two or
more semantically related verb cores. For example:
a. -stu in
-yamnastu to be hungry
-pdniustu to be thirsty
b. -sta in
-sume?esta to teach
-cidyusta to ponder
(3) They include sequences of phonemes which, if eliminated from
the core, would leave a remainder that would itself be a verb core
semantically related to the longer form. For example.:
a. -cI in
-sét-er windpipe; compare sti- to swallow
It also recurs in a number of semantically unrelated cores:
-sA-bact to pound
-sgui-cucr to drool
b. -cA in
-kfica man’s sister; compare -kui wife
-dyumica to learn; compare -d¥im1_ to remember
Other cores in which it occurs include the following:
-ti-nica to work
-wiéd-ca to listen
Anthrop.);*2- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 105
c. -cA in
-c4yuca to break; compare ¢édyt- to be broken
It also recurs in a great many semantically unrelated cores including the
following:
-pé-ruca tolick
-cé-naca to chew
-yucidyi-ca to rest
d. -tu in
-metu to freeze; compare -me’E to be frozen and hAé-mhe- ice
-ba?tu to sleep; compare -ba? to be sleepy
e. -ta ; in
-be-ta toask; compare -be io tell
f. -da- in
-détécaca tocut; compare -técaca to cut
g. -wai- in
-wiita to be hot (liquid) ; compare -éa to be hot
-waistayA to be cold (liquid); compare -staya_ to be cold
VERB CLASSES
The primary division in verbs is between transitive and intransitive
verbs. ‘Transitive verbs occur with a full set of pronominal affixes
(except Decade Class 180 and, in some cases, Decade Class 130)
while most intransitive verbs occur with only those of Decade Classes
100, 110, and 120. Some intransitive verbs occur with affixes of
Decade Class 140; others occur with Decade Class 180; but none
occur with Decade Classes 130, 150, or 160. Certain verbs which
are intransitive according to this inflectional definition must be trans-
lated by an English transitive expression with a third person object:
sauta I killed it
The transitive-intransitive dichotomy is thus based on structural and
not semantic criteria.
TRANSITIVE VERBS
Transitive verb stems are classified on the basis of their occurrence
with specific allomorphs of inflectional affixes. The most important
such classification is based on allomorphs of the pronominal prefixes.
While the number of verb classes is considerable, this number is only
a small fraction of what theoretically could result from all possible
combinations of the many allomorphs of inflectional affixes. There
are rather strict limitations on the freedom of distribution of specific
allomorphs. Groups of allomorphs rather than individual allomorphs
may be viewed as independent units in an examination of the combi-
nations which may constitute a complete verb paradigm.
Allomorphs of Century Class 100 occurring with transitive verbs
may be arranged in two sets of three partial paradigms. These are
designated la, 2a, 3a, 1b, 2b, and 3b (chart 5). Each allomorph is
listed by its phonemic shape and its reference number. In general,
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
106
V9GCT VSI VVGL Vésol Val VIGI
-1d “1d “1d “
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 137
CSPDA 1 |
_FDPAO1 | CTDPAO! |
CODPA 1 CIDOPA 1
CIOPA 1 |
Cuart 8.—P2 Clause Types
In spite of some freedom of order in the arrangement of slots within
the clause there are definite restrictions on their distribution. Con-
sidering the slots in the order that they are introduced in the charts
following the P slot, the following observations can be made.
The A slot always follows the P slot, usually contiguously. There
are a few occurrences, though, of a D slot intervening between the
P and A slots (PDA, DPDA and CSPDA).
The S and O slots may each occur either preceding or following
the P slot. The S slot and, to a lesser extent, the O slot occur with
greater frequency preceding than following the P slot. These slots are
generally contiguous to the P slot or separated from it by one another,
but occasionally a D, T, or M slot may intervene as in the sequences
SDP, OTDP, DSMP, etc.
Most commonly the D slot occurs immediately preceding the P
slot or separated from it by an S or O slot, or less frequently by a
T or M slot. When not occurring in this position it immediately
follows the P slot, or there may be two D slots in the clause, as in the
sequences DSDP, DSPD and MDPD.
The distribution of the T and M slots is comparable to that of
the D slot. They generally precede, but sometimes immediately
follow, the P slot. When preceding the P slot they may be separated
from it by an S, O, D, T or M slot.
138 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The I and C slots are the most restricted in their distribution.
An I slot occurs only clause-initially or preceded by a C slot, while a
C slot may occur only in initial position in the clause.
NON-PREDICATE CLAUSES
Non-predicate clauses are of rather infrequent occurrence in the
text, comprising only 42 of the 910 clauses. Of these, the most
commonly occurring is the prepositional clause, of which there are 30
in the text.
Of the prepositional clauses, seven consist of a D slot only:
D
di? bédnisdé no
here west side down
It was down here on the west side.
Sixteen are composed of a D slot followed by an S slot:
D S
duwé- didi na éi-nd
this way north down river
It was at the river flowing from the north.
Four are made up of a D slot preceded by an S slot:
Ss D
hiea-ntr ?4?4-taw1 aes
giant key there
The giant’s key is there.
In addition, there is one clause of the type CD and two of the type
CDS:
C D Ss
‘eu di-yu bisé-ri
and here blanket
And here is a blanket.
There are ten ?eu clauses in the text. These all contain an S slot
either introduced or closed by the particle ?eu. In this context
?eu may be translated as 2¢ was or there was.
eee)
?eu é484pa
Satan
Tt was Satan.
All but one of the ?eu clauses is composed entirely of an S slot. The
one exception has a C slot preceding the S slot:
C S
e su ?e ta ?eusu ?e mdé-éu 7iska hdidf ?eu
thus mule one which
There was one special mule.
Antror | 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 139
There are only two interrogative clauses in the text, but such clauses
are more common in ordinary conversation than this sampling would
indicate. An interrogative clause consists uniformly of an I slot
followed by an S slot:
I Ss
ha-di dv4-mi
where eagle
Where is the eagle?
INDEPENDENT VERSUS DEPENDENT CLAUSES
Most clauses are independent clauses and as such may stand alone
as full sentences. A dependent clause, on the other hand, never
occurs in isolation but is closely linked to a contiguous independent
clause. Three types of dependent clauses are identified in the text:
1. Prepositional clauses:
di? bénisdé na It was down here on the west side.
2. Clauses introduced by a C slot filled by gu and:
gu ?iska ?eu su G4?A4ubenai’r And he put one of them in (his pocket).
3. Clauses introducing or closing a quotation:
dyéineta ?eu d¥4-mi The eagle said.
Clauses introduced by gu differ from those introduced by other
connectives in that they presuppose a preceding clause to which they
are linked:
O D Pp. C O D E
du ?iska eu hé-y4 cd-ca-dyani gu du ?iska ?euhé-ydé ti8d-t1-Sé
this one with it he breathes and this one withit he has power
With one he breathes and with the other he has power.
Clauses introduced by ?ésgasku or other connectives, on the other
hand, may stand alone as independent clauses:
C sae P M
?ésgosku na é4pasr ktimi
but yet dark slightly
But tt was still a litile dark.
SUPRACLAUSE STRUCTURE
In this section the clause will be examined within the context of
longer stretches of speech. Certain elements will first be described
which are not considered to be an integral part of any clause. This
will be followed by a consideration of the position of dependent clauses
within larger syntactic units.
FRAGMENT UTTERANCES
Certain words or short sequences of words occur both in narrative
and in conversation which may be spoken in isolation, but which are
140 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
meaningless apart from the context in which they are spoken. The
fragment may be semantically dependent on the immediate linguistic
context or on the non-linguistic context.
Fragment utterances are most commonly exclamations or short
answers to questions. ‘They do not occupy a definable slot within a
clause or larger unit and are themselves too brief for syntactic analysis.
The following are examples of the 103 fragment utterances occurring in
the text:
ha- Yes.
hind O.K.
he What?
?eu he Is that so?
me: nasu_ Let’s go!
hawi- Here!
ws-?6é Thanks,
COMPLEX SENTENCES
The narrative text on which this analysis is based consists, for the
most part, of a series of independent clauses, each of which is in itself
a complete structural unit. Since each independent clause is a com-
plete sentence and is, in general, relatively brief, a Santa Ana narrative
appears highly fragmented as compared with English.
There are in the text two types of complex sentences, each com-
posed of an independent clause with one or more dependent clauses.
The first type of complex sentence is composed of an independent
clause followed by one or more dependent clauses of the type intro-
duced by the connective gu. There are 43 sentences of this type in
the text, including the following example:
independent clause dependent clause
ee
?ai su ’e ?iska GA?4ucdyuca gu ?iska ?eu su ¢4?4ubonai?1
one he broke it and one he put it in
Then he broke one and put one in (his pocket).
The second type of complex sentence is composed of an independent
clause preceded or followed by one or more prepositional clauses.
There are 27 occurrences of this type of sentence in the text, including
the following examples:
independent clause dependent clause
?e su 7e su si yuku ziku ?eu sandiyé-ku ai di?di pakacisu
back away he went St. James there gully
Then St. James went away again into the gully,
An oP yf 22; LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 141
dependent clause dependent clause dependent clause
_ _ —_—. SSS SS
duiwé- didi no ¢i-nd di? bdnisdé hoa ktidaisketa di?di
this way north down river here west side down round-top there
independent clause
a nn
di?ai dy4-?4u?u hdcaze-za gu CGéukui-sanu
there they lived man and his wife
On the west side of the river flowing from the north at Roundtop Mesa there lived
a man and his wife.
QUOTATIONS
Of the three types of dependent clauses described on page 139,
two occur as parts of the complex sentences discussed above. The
third type is that which introduces or closes a quotation and is ordi-
narily translated by such expressions as he said, he said to him, etc.
The occurrence of these clauses closely parallels the English equivalents
in that they may precede or follow the quotation, or they may be
omitted entirely.
quotational clause independent clause
su ?e su ?e dacitkuya su ndizi? si
he said to him willlie I
Then he said to him, ‘I am going to lie down.”
fragment utterance quotational clause
e_aK—X—X—X—“—___————— 7 —_—_—_———.0.. ee
?e su ?e su hind dyéineta eu sandiyé-ku
O.K. he said St. James
“O.K.,” said St. James.
Quotations are sometimes preceded and followed by dependent
quotational clauses:
quotational clause fragment quotational clause
a. —_o_ (a
su ?e ?eu d¥4-mi ?e Gdza_ hind d¥éineta
eagle hesaid O.K. he said
Then the eagle said, ‘‘O.K.”’
Constructions such as these are not regarded as complex sentences
because dependent quotational clauses may be linked not only to a
single fragment or independent clause but, in extended quotations,
to a whole series of sentences, some of which may themselves be
complex.
Ler. ”
"
fae
ay wall a i | io)
ima c A
pager ais irtéabivces wre cont pogelele sosbaed
MIWA TS qilestiinnn, © Toyompdemand er
rte. { rar st eit, at ay. 4 ale ole .
esd a soe a ase yr
ise ie he %
hw “ BYVOUTATOUO
A tAie ;
QUT sonad to hadieseb: aeatal) Jusbanqob to siqyy oedit ede ae
ofl .shodé. Bysdooeih acntiniitee xolqmioy ot to etcag eh Tee
LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 149
CLASS 5-2
INDICATIVE
siwi-trya I worshiped
stiwi-tEya you worshiped
kiwi-teya he worshiped
NEGATIVE
zazi skiwi-teya I didn’t worship
zazi siwi-tEya you didn’t worship
zazi kiwi-tEya he didn’t worship
DUBITATIVE
maybe I worshiped
f-tEyA maybe you worshiped
j-tEyaA maybe he worshiped
CLASS
INDICATIVE
supE I ate
supE you ate
kupE he ate
NEGATIVE
zizi skupE I didn’t eat
zizi supE you didn’t eat
zizi kupE he didn’t eat
DUBITATIVE
tupe maybe I ate
cupE maybe you ate
dyupE maybe he ate
HORTATIVE
kiwi-teya let me worship
cuwi-tEya worship
puiwi-trya let him worship
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
2 YA
-mi- kiwi-tEya — let me not worship
-mi- skiwi-tnya don’t worship
-mi- piwi-teya — let him not worship
(op (er for
> o> o>
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba niwi-trya let me worship (in the
future)
ba ciwi-tEya worship
ba puiwi-tpya let him worship
5-8
HORTATIVE
kupE let me eat
éupE eat
pupE let him eat
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-m{- kupE let me not eat
-skupE don’t eat
ba-mi- pupE let him not eat
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba nupE let me eat (in the future)
ba cupE eat
ba pupE let him eat
CLASS 5-9
Class 5-9 is inflected like Class 5-8 except that allomorphs 104G
and 105G occur in the first person hortative and negative hortative:
nuiwata-nizanE let us work
CLASS 5-10
Class 5-10 differs from Classes 5-8 and 5-9 in that it takes allo-
morphs 104M and 105M in the first person hortative and negative
hortative:
oe
SutA-nizana let us two work
150
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
INDICATIVE
sé-ni J walked
si-ni you walked
k4-ni he walked
NEGATIVE
zAziskA-ni I didn’t walk
zAzisA-ni you didn’t walk
zazi ka-ni he didn’t walk
DUBITATIVE
té-ni maybe I walked
cA-ni maybe you walked
cA-ni maybe he walked
INDICATIVE
saza I said
gécaza you said
kaza he said
NEGATIVE
ziziskéza I didn’t say
zazi gécaza you didn’t say
zZazi kaza he didn’t say
DUBITATIVE
taza maybe I said
dys¢aza maybe you said
Aza maybe he said
INDICATIVE
$a it is mine
gdz4 itis yours
ka it is his
$a you are mine
NEGATIVE
zazi ska _it isn’t mine
ZAzi gdz4i it isn’t yours
ZAzi ka ut isn’t his
zAzi $a you aren’t mine
DUBITATIVE
ta maybe tt is mine
dvs 74 maybe it is yours
ca maybe it is his
¢a maybe you are mine
CLASS 6-3
HORTATIVE
kA-ni
?4-ni
pé-ni
let me walk
walk
let him walk
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
bA-mf- ka-ni
bA-m{- sk4-ni
b4é-mfi- pé-ni
let me not walk
don’t walk
let him not walk
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba né-ni
ba ¢cAé-ni
ba pé-ni
walk
let him walk
CLASS 7-18
HORTATIVE
kdza_ let me say
Zaza say
pdiza_ let him say
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mi- k4za let me not say
bé-m{i- skdza_ don’t say
bA-mi- pdza let him not say
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba naza let me say (in the future)
ba d¥écaza_ say
ba pdza let him say
CLASS 7-15
HORTATIVE
na_ let it be mine
za let it be yours
pa _ let it be his
Sa be mine
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mi- na let it not be mine
ba-m{- ska let it not be yours
ba-mi- pa let it not be his
ba-mf- $a don’t be mine
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba ha let it be mine (in the future)
ba d¥sz4__let it be yours
ba pa let it be his
ba ¢a be mine
[Bull. 191
let me walk (in the future)
Anthrop. Pap.
No Bot 2 ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 151
CLASS 8—14
INDICATIVE HORTATIVE
Stidvasr I fasted ku?tdvasr let me fast
guzidvasrt you fasted zud¥asi fast
gaudvas1_ _—ihe fasted pdudvasr let him fast
NEGATIVE NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
bé-mf- ki?tidyasr let me not fast
ba-mi- sgéudvasr don’t fast
ba-mi- pdéudvasr — let him not fast
zAzi sgdudvasr I didn’t fast
zZAzi gizidvasi you didn’t fast
z4zi gdudyasr ihe didn’t fast
DUBITATIVE FUTURE HORTATIVE
tu?advasr maybe I fasted ba nudvaksr let me fast (in the
future)
ba d¥izidvasr fast
ba p4ud¥asr let him fast
dyuztidyasi maybe you fasted
dy4udvasrt maybe he fasted
CLASS 9-11
INDICATIVE HORTATIVE
sdudi I planted kA?dudi let me plant
sdudi you planted é4udi plant
k4?4udi_ he planted pa?dudi let him plant
NEGATIVE NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
zAzi skA?4udi I didn’t plant ba-mi- k4?4udi let me not plant
zAzi sdudi you didn’t plant ba-mf- sk4?4udi don’t plant
zAzi kA?dudi _ihe didn’t plant bé-mi- pé?4udi let him not plant
DUBITATIVE FUTURE HORTATIVE
tA?4udi maybe I planted ba n4udi let me plant (in the future)
cA?d4udi maybe you planted ba c4?4udi plant
G4?4udi maybe he planted ba pé?dudi_ let him plant
CLASS 9-12
Class 9-12 verbs differ from those of Class 9-11 in that allomorphs
104N and 105N occur in the first person hortative and negative
hortative:
S4udimha let us two plant
CLASS 10-6
INDICATIVE
si-ba?tu I slept
Si-ba?tu you slept
zi-ba?tu he slept
NEGATIVE
z4zi sd¥i-ba?tu I didn’t sleep
Zizi S{-ba?tu you didn’t sleep
zazi 2i-ba?tu he didn’t sleep
682-611—64—_—__14
HORTATIVE
kdiba?tu let me sleep
?j-ba?tu sleep
pi?i-ba?tu let him sleep
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
bé-mi- kdiba?tu —_ let me not sleep
bé-mi- sd¥i-ba’tu don’t sleep
bé-mf- pi?i-ba?tu let him not sleep
152 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
DUBITATIVE
ti-ba’tu maybe I slept
ci-ba?tu maybe you slept
di-ba?tu maybe he slept
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba ni-ba?tu let me sleep (in the
future)
ba ci-ba?tu sleep
ba pi?i-ba?tu let him sleep
CLASS 10-7
INDICATIVE
éikupawa I chopped
Sikupawa you chopped
zikupAwa he chopped
NEGATIVE
zdzi sdvyikupawa I didn’t chop
zazi SikupAwA you didn’t chop
zAzi zikUpAWA he didn’t chop
DUBITATIVE
tikupawa maybe I chopped
cikupawAa maybe you chopped
dikupawa maybe he chopped
HORTATIVE
kékupawa_ let me chop
pikupawa chop
pikupawa let him chop
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mi- kékupawa let me not chop
ba-mf- sd¥ikupawa don’t chop
ba-mi- pikupawA let him not chop
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba nikupawa let me chop (in the
future)
ba cikupawa chop
ba pikupawa let him chop
CLASS 10-21
INDICATIVE
sikupawanE we chopped
SikupawanE you all chopped
zikupawanE they chopped
NEGATIVE
zAzi sd¥ikupawanE we didn’t chop
zAzi Sikupawane you all didn’t
chop
zAzi zikupawanE they didn’t chop
DUBITATIVE
tikupawanE maybe we chopped
cikupawank maybe you all chopped
dikupawanE maybe he chopped
CLASS
HORTATIVE
nikupawanE let us chop
pikupawanE chop (you all)
pikupawanE let them chop
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
bé-mf- nikupawanE let us not chop
ba-mi- sd¥ikupawanE don’t chop (you
all)
b4-mi- pikupawanE let them not
chop
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba nikupawanE let us chop (in the
future)
ba cikupawanE chop (you all)
ba pikupawankE let them chop
10—22
Class 10-22 verbs are inflected like those of Class 10-21 except that
allomorphs 104P and 105P occur in the first person hortative and
negative hortative:
stikupawana let us two chop
set 2 ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 153
CLASS 11-25
INDICATIVE
sédéku we went
gddéku you all went
zekU they went
NEGATIVE
zizi sdyeku we didn’t go
zizi gsdeku you all didn’t go
Zizi zekU they didn’t go
DUBITATIVE
tédeku maybe we went
dyidéku maybe you all went
déku maybe they went
HORTATIVE
nédéku let us go
déku go (you all)
peku let them go
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mf- néddéku — let us not go
ba-mf-sdyéku don’t go (you all)
ba-m{i- péeku let them not go
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba nédéku _ let us go (in the future)
ba dvidéku go (you all)
ba péku let them go
CLASS 11-26
Class 11-26 verbs differ from those of Class 11-25 in that they
occur with allomorphs 1040 and 1050 in the first person hortative and
negative hortative:
sté?éyu let us two go
CLASS 12-27
INDICATIVE
sgd-nawant J am mean
gdzi-nawanl you are mean
cA-nawant he is mean
NEGATIVE
Zazi scA-nawanl I am not mean
zazi gdzA-nawanl you are not mean
zAzi CA-nawanl he is not mean
DUBITATIVE
tézA-nawant maybe I am mean
dyézA-nawanl maybe you are mean
H A ’ .
ta-nawanl maybe he is mean
HORTATIVE
nézAi-nawant let me be mean
zA-nawanl be mean
9A .J .
pé-nawanl let him be mean
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
fs ,
-ndézA-nawant let me not be mean
scA-nawanl don’t be mean
pé-nawanl let him not be
mean
FUTURE HORTATIVE
let me be mean (in
the future)
ba d¥dz4-nawant be mean
ba pé-nawant let him be mean
ba néza-nawanl
CLASS 18-28
INDICATIVE
sktikar J lay down
gddikar you lay down
CikAI he lay down
NEGATIVE
ziziséikat ‘I didn’t lie down
zazi gddikat you didn’t lie down
ZAzi Cik al he didn’t lie down
HORTATIVE
nédikat let me lie down
dik al lie down
pikal let him lie down
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mi- nédik ar let me not lie down
ba-m{- scikar don’t lie down
ba-mf- pikar let him not lie down
154 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
DUBITATIVE
tédikat maybe I lay down
dvidikat maybe you lay down
tik aI maybe he lay down
INDICATIVE
si-ca I didit
Si-ca you did it
ci-cA he did it
NEGATIVE
zazi sti-ca TI didn’t do it
zizi Si-cA = you didn’t do it
zazi ci-cA he didn’t do tt
DUBITATIVE
ti-ca maybe I did it
ci-cA maybe you did it
ti-cA maybe he did it
INDICATIVE
St-za-nE we did it
Si-za-nE you all did it
ei-za-nE they did it
NEGATIVE
zAzi sti-za-nE we didn’t do it
z4zi St-za-nhe you all didn’t do tt
zAzi ci-za-nE they didn’t do it
DUBITATIVE
ti?i-za-nn maybe we did it
ci-za-nE maybe you all did it
ti-za-nE maybe they did it
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba nédikar let me lie down (in the
CLASS 14-4
future)
ba d¥idikart lie down
ba pikar let him lie down
HORTATIVE
kaica let me do it
pi-ca = do ttt
pi?i-ca let him do it
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
bA-m{f- kAica —_ let me not do it
bé-mf- séi-ca don’t do it
ba-mf- pi?i-ca let him not do it
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba ni-ca let me do it (in the future)
ba ct-ca do it
ba pi?i-ca let him do it
CLASS 14-19
HORTATIVE
ni-za-ne let us do it
pi-za-nE ~— do it (you all)
pi?i-za-ne let them do itt
NEGATIVE HORTATIVE
ba-mfi- ni-za-nE let us not do it
b4é-mf- séi-za-ne don’t do it (you all)
bé-mf- pi?i-za-ne let them not do it
FUTURE HORTATIVE
ba ni-za-neE let us do it (in the future)
ba cf-za-nE do it (you all)
ba pi?i-za-ne let them do it
CLASS 14-20
Class 14-20 verbs differ from those of Class 14-19 in that they take
allomorphs 104Q and 105Q in the first person hortative and negative
hortative:
sti-za-na let us two do it
APPENDIX 2. TEXT’
D P S D
—oemr- SO ——@-@-—— >
di*ai' su ?e hau?? da?4ér1? sandiyé-ku‘/ ?ai su ?e su ha-di®
there near he arrived St. James where
Ss ii P C
Gi-na° d¥5-ta-ma’ / z4zi®?ite® dara! / su ?e ta}!
river it is full not able to he crosses thus
P D O
su Cuidé.?anikuya!? dtké.!* d¥i! / su ?eu su sdézanadisd’ use
he was asking that way up Our Father
P I D O
euida-?anikuya!? / giwa-' ?éza” diké- ku'® éfer® 93-t4-ma”
he was asking how at least that way south water it is full
iP A D O
niuma”’ gink?? / ?e su ?e yusi?? no% eu d %4-mi%®
will cross he from there down eagle
D P D iP
?eu su ?e yuisi2? no% tagtiyanE?’ / su ?e hau?? diuwaéér?? /
from there down he was sent near he approached
P I fragment P sl ald
a Se ee SS
su e ?e dacikuya” / zi*° haidi#! yu-32 / ha.?* / d¥éineta** / Seip a2/
he said to him what which maybe _ yes he said I need you
I iP A fragment ig S
Fu niud’a-wa?® cu” / su %e hé-mé-* / d’éineba®™ Peud’4.mi* /
maybe will be of use you all right he said eagle
fragment iP D A D
gu %e hind” ?égu” / nddéreyu" disi®ku® sazi.?0® /ha-di®
O.K. then will go there south we two where
S D P A 5
SE ee ee ee ee
hicé-nti“ d’&-trha*® / ?eu ?ai hau?? nddé?éyu*! stizu-?u* / gasi-k1*
giant his home near will go we two king
O BP P A
his wife he lost look for we her
7 Superior numbers in Indian text are explained on pages 163-164.
155
156 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
S P fragment P
—_—_—_—_—_—————“_ K——w ——— -_eaoeorreereeeee™
su ?e ?eu d’4-mi%® ?e Gaza! / hina® / d¥éineta * /
eagle he said OK: he said
fragment D F D
2 ra >? : : y» , . .
su ?e diwé. » ?écu “ su / 8étid¥a © ?ai d%i!* Gigtya */ su ?e ?ai di 4
this way then my back up sit up
P S D P
—_ —-_—~ ee EE
giya © eu % sandiya-ku */ su ?e disi* ku’® su ?esu d’a?aiyu * /
e sat St. James there south they flew
D EF D Pp
——_—_. —_—____.. oo Sa EEnEnEEEEEEE EEE
su’e di dé?éyu / su ?ed%i *ha-di® su dé?é-ya?atank ® /
up they went up where they were going
EP D S
su ?e su d’tkaéa © / ai ho %t ?eu > =4?4-sti-ca © hicd-nti “ /
he saw it down his city giant
P S O ik
= A , , J, 2 ¥
su ?e su d’ukaéa * /su ?e Gécr *! su hiegd-ntr** d’4-mi*® GAd¥4-Se ® /
he saw it also giant eagle his
P D P
| oe an
su ?e su 4?4ud’u ®& /su ?e sud’ * digd-nikuya *
he knew up he was looking
S )
EERIE ev — — ah Oo
éécr © hicgd-ntr * CAd’4-Se © / su ?e su ?eu hicé-nti * CAd%A-Se ©? d¥A-mi 26
also giant his giant his eagle
P S iP P
U s A vs 2 pe 9
su ?e d’ti-scéca © / gu ?e hicd-ntr* é4ka4- © / su ?e d%ima
he cried out giant he heard he came out
S O P fragment
—SSS—yEZ OO eee ———_
hicd-nti “ su ?e ?eudu™ d’4-mi% %e ta?4neyawa © / hina * ?éeu * /
giant this eagle he was commanded O.K. then
P P S D
(SSS SS eee eee Ss eae _——.
ét-wasi °° / su ?e GA?Auwasi 7 ?eu d¥4-mi 2° / su ?e su hau? ?
attack he attacked eagle near
Ant %o1 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 157
P P S
su da?Atinu- 7 / ?ai su GAwaéinrya 7 / ?e su ?eu sandiyé-ku *
he arrived they fought St. James
O iP
hisgai 7? d¥auéu % /
knife he had
?eu su ’e su hé-ya-si su ?e ?eu du hieaé-nti éad’A-Se-Si did’awa/di?ai
with it this giant his (eagle) he stabbed there
su %e su ¢A?Audapa-d’anu / su %e yiwé- no su ?e d¥t-za-Ga ?eu du
they killed him this way down he fell this
hicd-ntr d’4-mi é4d¥4-Se / su ?e ?Aisi su ?e su dé?éyu / su ?e su
giant eagle his there they went
ha-di no yuiwé- su ?e nddé?éyu ?eu ?ai hé-di hicd-ntr d’4-ma
where down this way will go where giant he dwells
sca?a-sti-ca / Aisi d¥A-ma / su ?e ?ai Bendé-na d’4wizanisu / ?eu
city there he dwells window he was there
Aisi d¥i d’4-mi su ?e Gigtiya / su %e ?eu sandiydé-ku éécr su yiku
there up eagle he sat St. James also away
ne éigtyanu: / su ?e ?aisi d¥1 éigtiya / su ?e ?eu du sandiya-ku
down he sat there up he sat this St. James
d¥a-mi hawé. tiyt-zé-yanz ?e dacrkuya / disi ba Giyt-kam1/
eagle this way he lead he said to him here future wait for me
hané duké- kaigé / su ?e hind d¥éineta %eu d¥A-mi /
let me there look O.K. he said eagle
su ?e yuké- su ?e hawé- sa digd-nikuya ?eu sandiyé-ku / yuké.
that way this way around he looked St. James that way
hawé: digé-nikuya / hawé- pend4-na sa no Cinésa / su ?e zAzi
this way he looked this way window around down he peered not
ite d’tbonu- / ?égasku ?eu sai d4?4-?a zi Githasééica-Si / ?eu
able to be entered _— but all itis shut thing iron with
su ?e ta su ?e ?eu ?ai hé-di / hau? da?4ér ?eu ?ai hé-di é4ukui-sanu
thus where near he came where his wife
gasi-k1 ?ai d’aku / su ?e ?eu d¥4-Se ?e su %e disaca / su 7e
king she was her name he called
158 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
éaiskd-?acar ?eu gasi-ki Géukui-sanu / he d¥éineta / su ?e ?eu
she turned king his wife what she said
sdiyéiba-te hisu / gdz4-26 ?eu sktiyanikuya diwé- si ?tidf-ye /
I look for you you your husband he told me this way back to get
su ?e %e d¥éineta / ?eu he / ?égu giwa- sa nfurna si / hied-nt1
she said allright then how back will I giant
get out
74?4-tawr yuké- yu? ha-di d’aku / ?eu nu- k4?4-tnya /
key that way there where it is only he has
zazi hinu ska?4-tnya / giwa- ?écu sa nizi-mha / su ?e ?eu gastf-kr
will get
out
cAukui-sanu ?e ¢4za / diwai dtisi né?ét1 gu ktimi hacu magu/
not I I have how then back king
his wife she said this way wilicome he in a little while
hayéi ba h4-di Géisguihasga / disi z4?Atinu- / ?e su ha-winda naud’u
somewhere
there future hide back he arrives right away will know
gu / su %e hina d¥éineta / su ?e ?eu si yuku zud’u su yuirai ha-di
he O.K. he said back away he went there somewhere
éhisgurhaga / su %e su diwé- su si Ga-niéad’aya / ?ésgasku no ka’anu-/
he hid this way back he was coming but down he stepped
su ?e su ha?aéi- wékowokod’a/su ?emi su ¢&?4ud’u/mmm d*¥éineta/
earth it shook already he knew he said
hau di? zi gaku / d¥éineta ?eu hicd-nti / su %e ?eu gast-k1
who here thing he is he said giant king
éAukui-sanu ?e éAza / zizi ha-di hau gaku gu z4zi ha-di hau
his wife she said not somewhere who he is and not somewhere who
ska?atiSaniguyang-di / su %e ?eu gasi-kr CAukui-sanu hiea-nti
we talk to each other king his wife giant
?e dactkuya / m{i-n4 $4sbanasurhanu- / yu- d’idiéayurha /
she said to him let me I wash your head maybe you are tired
mi-n4 $4sbanasumanu- /su ?eyu: mé?é- nuyucid’i-ca cu rawa: /
let me I wash your head maybe thus will rest you good
gu ni-ba?tu cu / su ?e hind ?égu / d¥éineta ?eu hicé-nti / su ?e ?eu su
and will sleep you O.K. then he said giant
AO? ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 159
¢a?auwispa-ziwita ?ai du gast-kr é4ukui-sanu / su ?e su haiku su
she made suds this king his wife when
ta?4sbanasumane / eu du hicé-ntr ?eu t&?A4sba nasurhane /
his head was washed this giant his head was washed
su ?e su di-ba?tu / su ?e ?eu du gasi-k1 éAukui-sanu su ?e ?eu
he slept this giant his wife
d’tbéuca sandiya-ku / diwé- su gaiti si ?i-ma / su zi-ba?tu / su ?e
she called St. James this way come on back come _he sleeps
?eu ?ai su ?e diube-ta / su ?eu yiké- ki-ti ?e zupe- / yu?4i ha-di
she told him there mountain go there where
d*i ?eu d’4wA:-?a / ?4isi c4-cad’a ?eu / gu ?eu ?4isi d’4winuska-ti /
up he kept them there he breathes and there his hearts
d’A-mi- ?4isi d’4winuska-t1 / du ?iska ?eu hé-y4 c4-ca-d¥ani /
two there his hearts this one with it he breathes
gu du Viska ?eu hé-¥a tiSa-ti-36 / su ?e ?eu ta ?ai ta?abe?enk
and this one with it he has power thus he was told
?eu du sandiyé-ku / du d’ast-k1 Géukui-sanu ?e taza / ?ésgasku ?ai
this St. James this king his wife she said but there
giuku mi-Kaica / ?ai ¢A-nawani mid’u- / eu ?ai gtiwa-sd’u / su ?e ?eu
he has mountain lion heis mean very there he watches
sandiyaé-ku ?e t4za /hé-mé- ?ezi-ne si/su?e sa d°tirhonu- /
St. James he said all right will go I back he left
su ?e ?ai su ?e su ?eu d’4-mi tiyti-zé-yane /?ai su %e ¢A7Atisaniguyanda /
eagle he lead they talked together
su ?e ?e dactkuya d4-mi/diwé- ?égu su na su sté?éyu/su’e sa
he said to himeagle _ this way then let’s go let’s go back
d’i éigtyanu- / su ?e *Aisi yuké. d’a?Aiyu yurai haé-di ?eu du-ti /
up ihe sat there that way they flew there where mountain
su ?eha-dinoziyé- bono éigtyana di?-d’anu su %e su / ?ésgasku
where down below west down they sat here but
su ?e emi di-yikaéa kau? zi md-Kaica / su ?emi di-yikaéa /
mountain
already he saw them something already he saw them
lion
su ?e su ?ai su yuku no étegtiya ?eu sandiyé-ku / su ?e ?Aisf ha-
away down he sat St. James from there east
160 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
ni-yu- ka-ni/?e zud’u/su ?e su d%ukaéa ?eumdt-kaica/ hau? su ha-ni
himself he walked he went hesaw him mountain lion near from the
east
éa-nigad’aya / su eu yu? zi kiéayawane mhe- / ka hazanz di g?astiné
he was walking there thing he was mad like his hair up it stood
?e su 2e/hawé- d-ni/su?e su ?emi sandiyaé-ku ééci su ha-ku d’A4wiza-n1
this he walked already St. James also ready he had
way prepared
hisgai-si / su ?e ?isgawa ?ai su ?e su ¢ud%ad*r / su ?e ?eu diube?ene
knife both they fought she told him
du gasi-k1 édukui-sanu ?eu ?Aisf d’d-mf- eawinuska-ti-8é / ?e su %e
this king his wife there two his hearts
su ?e CA?audanu- mi-kaica / ?ai su ?e d¥i Gutika-Sa / su ?e ?ai
he killed it mountain lion up he climbed
d’i-?tkaca ?eu nawirika hawé- di d’4?aku / ?ai su ?e ?iska
he saw them eggs this way up they sat one
éa?aucayuca gu 7iska ¢4?4uboanaimanu- / su ?e yusi no zud’u /
he broke it and one he put in his pocket from there down he went
ee
su ?e ?ai hausé da?Aér/ eu ?ai ha-disi diyti-kam1/ d%4-mi hé-ya
back he arrived where back he waited eagle with it
éa-niéadYayane / su ?4isi sa d’i éigtyanu- / su %e su ytsi dé?dyu /
he was going there back up he sat from there they went
?ésgosku su ?emi yu? ?e gtiwa- gast-kr GAukui diube?ene / su ?emi
but already there how king his wife she told him already
hicé-nti su diwa-sa yu? ?e / su ?e haus4 da?4ér / ?ai su ?e no
giant he was sick there back he arrived down
éigtiyanu- su ?e su / su éécr diyt-kami gasi-ki Géukui-sanu / su %e
he sat also she waited king his wife
hausé da?A¢inu: / su ?e su diubéuca su ?e / su gaitr diwé- ?tipa /
back he arrived she called him come on this way enter
dacikuya / su gaiti ha-né / ?a si ciytce/ ha. d¥éineta /
she said to him come on question back you brought yes he said
si ¢iyice / hawi- / su ?e ?ai ta?Audi?-d¥anu / su ?e ytiké- ?eu
back I brought here it was given there
?iscawa ?e dé?éyu su / su diwa-sa / su ?e su ?e dacikuya /
both they went he was sick he said to him
di sanasgai ®e pt-ca / dacikuya /su ?e ta d*i __ ti-zane / gu ?e
up your head do it he said to him thus up he did
An G9] °2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 161
?ai no dustadrca ?eu / su ?e Pai ta?4mud’uzane ?eu du hicd-nt1/
down he burst he was killed this giant
su ?e su gasi-kr éAukui-sanu gu sandiy4é-ku su yuwé- / su ?e ?Aisi
king his wife and St. James this way there
d‘i ?isgawa Gigtiyanodi--d’anu / su ?e ?4isi sa déku ha-di gasi-k1
up both they sat there back they went were king
d¥a-tha / su ?e sandiyé-ku kamaka gast-kr tiwakuica / haidf
he lived St. James his daughter king he married which one
gast-kr diya-?ani-8é / ta yupé- sca /
king he promised thus story
FREE TRANSLATION
St. James arrived at the ocean and was not able to cross. So he
asked God how he might cross the ocean. Then an eagle was sent
down from above.
The eagle approached and said, ‘‘What is it?” ‘‘Yes,” he said, “I
need you. Maybe you will be of use.” ‘‘All right,” said the eagle.
“O.K., then, we will go south to the giant’s house. The king lost his
wife. We are going to look for her.” ‘O.K.,’” said the eagle,
“come sit on my back.” Then St. James got on. Then they flew
south and up they went. As they were flying up there they saw the
giant’s city down below. The giant also had an eagle and he knew
what was happening.
The giant’s eagle looked up and cried out. Then the giant heard and
came out. “O.K., attack!’, he commanded his eagle. So the eagle
attacked. When he came near they began fighting. St. James had
a knife and with it stabbed the giant’s eagle. They killed the giant’s
eagle and down he fell! Then they went down to the city where the
giant lived. The eagle perched on the window of the giant’s house and
St. James got off and sat down. Then St. James said to the eagle who
had taken him there, ‘‘Wait for me here. Let me look around.”
“O.K.,” said the eagle.
So St. James looked around this way and that. He peered through
the window but he could not get in. It was shut with iron bars.
Then he came to where the king’s wife was. He called her name and
she turned around. ‘What is it?” she said. ‘I’m looking for you.
162 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Your husband told me to come and get you.” “All right,” she said,
“but how will I get out? The giant has the only key somewhere.
I don’t have any. How will we get out, then? He will come back in
a little while. Hide somewhere. When he comes back he will know
right away what is going on.” ‘O.K.,” he said, and he went and hid
somewhere. ‘The giant was coming back and as he stepped the earth
shook. He already knew, and he said, ‘Hmmm! Who is here?”
Then the king’s wife said, ‘“Nobody is here and there is nobody
talking with me.” The king’s wife then said to the giant ‘Let me
wash your head. Maybe you are tired. Let me wash your head
and then maybe you will rest well and go to sleep.” ‘“O.K., then,”
said the giant. Then the King’s wife made suds. When his head
was washed the giant went to sleep. Then the king’s wife called
to St. James, ‘Come here; he is asleep.”” Then she told him, “Go
to the mountains. He keeps them there. There he breathes and
there he has his two hearts. He breathes with one, and with one
he has power.” Thus it was told to St. James. The king’s wife
said, “But he has a mountain lion there watching who is very mean.”
Then St. James said, ‘All right, I’ll go.” So he left and talked
with the eagle who had led him. Then the eagle said to him, ‘Come
on, let’s go.”” So he got back on and they flew away to the moun-
tains. Then they landed down on the west side, but the mountain
lion had already seen them.
Then St. James got off and walked on eastward alone. The moun-
tain lion saw him and approached from the east. He was mad and his
hair stood up ashe approached. St. James had his knife ready and the
two of them fought. The king’s wife had told him where the two
hearts were, so he killed the mountain lion and climbed up. He saw
two eggs sitting there. Then he broke one of them, put one in his
pocket and climbed back down.
Then he arrived back where the eagle was waiting. He got back on
and from there they returned according to the instructions of the king’s
wife. The giant was already sick when he got back and dismounted.
The king’s wife, too, was waiting. ‘Come on in,” she called to him,
“did you bring it back?” ‘‘Yes,” he said, “‘here it is.” And he gave
it to her. Then they both went to the sick one. He said to him,
“Lift up your head.” Then he lifted it up and burst. So the giant
was killed. Then the king’s wife and St. James got on the eagle and
they went back to the king’s house. And St. James married the king’s
daughter that he had promised to him. That is the story.
An oRoT » LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 163
CONAaARWHe
EXPLANATION OF NUMBERS IN TEXT
. Preposition, there.
. Preposition, near.
Verb, he arrived. Affix 123G + stem, -4?4ér1.
. Referential, St. James. From Spanish Santiago.
. Preposition, where, somewhere.
. Referential, river.
Verb, it is full. Affix 123A + stem, -6-t4 + affix 403.
Modal, not.
. Modal, able to.
. Verb, he emerged or, in this context, he crosses over. Affix 123A + stem, -tirha.
. Connective, thus.
. Verb, he was asking. Affix 123C + stem, -tidd-?a + affix 401B.
. Preposition, that way.
. Directional, up.
. Verb, our father. Affix 101G + stem, -dnaisd¥u + affix 5011.
. Interrogative, how?
. Modal, at least.
. Directional, south.
. Referential, water.
. Verb, it is full. Same as 7 but with affix 121A instead of 123A.
. Verb, will emerge or cross over. Same as 10 but with affix 201B instead of 123A.
. Verbal auxiliary, third person subject with condition suffix.
. Preposition, from there, from afar.
. Directional, down.
. Particle which in certain contexts adds emphasis to other words.
. Referential, eagle.
. Verb, he was sent. Affix 123H + affix 302B + stem, -dguya + affix 502A.
. Verb, he approached. Affix 123B + stem, -twéer.
. Verb, he said to him. Affix 123G + stem, -acikuya.
. Interrogative, what?
. Interrogative, which?
. Modal, maybe.
. Exclamation, yes.
. Verb, he said. Affix 123A + stem, -diheta.
. Verb, I need you. Affix 141B + stem, -féfpa.
. Verb, will be of use. Affix 201B + stem, -tid¥4-wa?.
. Verbal auxiliary, second person subject.
. Exclamation, all right, that will do.
. Exclamation, O.K.
. In some contexts a connective; here part of an exclamatory phrase.
. Verb, will go (dual subject). Affix 201G + stem, -é?éyuv.
. Preposition, there.
. Verbal auxiliary, first person dual subject.
. Referential, giant. From Spanish gigante.
. Verb, he lives, his house. Affix 123A + stem, -4-mha.
. Referential, king. From Spanish cacique. May be alternatively analyzed
as a verb consisting of affix 121A + stem, -asi-k1.
. Verb, his wife. Affix 121D + stem, -Aukui.
. Particle which modifies meaning of following verb.
. Verb, he did it, or, in this context with the particle tu, he lost. Affix 121G +
stem, -fwicA.
164 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull 19%
. Verb, will look for (dual subject). Affix 201D + stem, -fyéipa + affix 501B.
. Verb, he said. Affix 123D + stem, -4za.
. Preposition, this way.
. Verb, my back. Affix 101E + stem, -dtidya.
. Verb, sit (imperative). Affix 114D + stem, -tigtya.
. Verb, he sat. Same as 54 but with affix 123C instead of 114D.
. Verb, they two flew. Affix 123A + stem, -4?diyu.
. Verb, they two went. Same as 41 but with affix 123G instead of 201G.
. Verb, they were going. Affix 123G + stem, -é?é-ya?ata + affix 402B.
. Verb, he saw him (or zt). Affix 123A + stem, -tkaéa.
. Verb, his city. Affix 123D + stem, -4?4-sti-ca.
. Particle, also.
. Verb, his (referring to a living animal). Affix 123D + stem, -dd¥4-Se.
. Verb, he knew. Affix 123F + stem, -d4udyv.
. Verb, he was looking. Affix 123G + stem, -fg4 + affix 401B.
. Verb, he cried out. Affix 123A + stem, -t-sééca.
. Verb, he heard. Affix 123C + stem, -dké-.
. Pronoun, this one.
. Verb, he was commanded. Affix 123H + affix 302A + stem, -4nnya +
affix 502G.
. Verb, attack (imperative). Affix 114D + stem, -Auwast.
. Verb, he attacked. Same as 69, but with affix 123F rather than 114D
. Verb, he arrived. Affix 123G + stem, -a?d¢r + affix 602.
. Verb, they fought. Affix 123C + stem, -Awdin1ya.
. Referential, knife.
. Verb, he had. Affix 123A + stem, -duév.
PSO US ie as aie ngs oe cae
APPENDIX 3. VOCABULARY
UNINFLECTED WORDS
?a interrogative particle
Pai there
?sitdstr mattress, mat
Gini house
?Adausi cooking pot
?4-dy¥4-n1 tether
?4ugubd?akacr nail
?4ndmati seat
°fndizint lamp
?ané- tasty
?4-sh large bowl
?disi there
?distazini trousers
?Asini grass
?4sdni wheat
7474-tdwi key
?4-wé-nt grinding stone, metate
?e and
eu narrative particle and em-
phasizer
?égu_ then, therefore
emi already
?ésgasku but
?ibAnt Cholla cactus
?{-84ndnt bark
*idyawa_ centipede
%j-kani vine
*{?fnd-ni liver
*indwi flour
?isa manure
‘isdiwa arrow
?isgawa both
?iska one
?isd-ni meat
?isd porcupine
Yisatr lard
ite able to
?jya-ni_ life
?t-basdy4ni legging
°abéwi food
°a-bd-nd& needle
?i-didyawistr saddle
°Ggupdwanl az
43.
44,
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
Qe
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Oks
78.
(9.
80.
Si.
82.
83.
84.
*Gki-ydthr earring
?u-kdydwi towel, handkerchief
?a-ma4
?a-mt
?U-siw
-c1_ help, asst.
‘cI gun
isdyAni rope
?i-skdicr bell
usd-cA sun
?u-t4-nt basket
?uwaka baby, doll
?Gwdistdnt bowl
?t-wis
?aydumbuimer
gict match
?agusti drill
?Srd-
hot (in reference to the
weather)
ba future hortative particle
bi-ba
bati
grandparent
whitewash
bé-raka toad
bisi-nd purple
bi-su
biya-
cAcl
cécl
cé-ya
cina
cuski
SA
cA- pi
bee
stance
drum
tilted, lopsided
bimt-na torso, rib
bi-raika butterfly
bizuwist1 lightnin
bo west; bdndmi
bézd-mha log
breath
wall
jirst
turkey
fox
fly
¢é-bén4__ bitter
OQ: O-
Or
a
Cisdi?i
éiyduzani
é4-dva
é4m4
Gécl
D
WASCA stew
fel water, juice
f
LY A: x}
cimastéica iron
ni honey
side
tomorrow
also
s
g
westward
adobe brick
165
BUREAU OF AMERICAN
éémr three; éémiya three times 138.
Cind river 139.
éAndrhr bat 140.
édyA-ni shaman 141.
&-riga hawk 142.
dabénuska horned toad 143.
da-ni squash, pumpkin 144.
dapacl corpse 145.
da4waca moon, month 146.
désu place 147.
di? here 148.
di?4i there 149.
disi from here 150.
di-skim4& cornhusk 151.
diya dog 152.
du_ this, this one 1/593}
duké- that way 154,
dtiwimrs1 stocking 155.
diwé-. this way 156.
dyé-dyu bobcat 157.
dy4-mi eagle 158.
dva-na four 159.
dya4na jackrabbit 160.
dyainé deer 161.
dydwa_ early 162.
dv4-wi gourd 163.
dv4ya’ani pifion nut 164.
dyéiclI pifion pine 165.
dvi up 166.
dyidya north 167.
dyini above 168.
dyti-bi badger 169.
dyi-m{i- two 170.
dyims brother ileal
dvi-ya twice 172:
dyd-sa_ elk 173.
gdnami beans 174.
gdisbisa world 175.
gasgduga quail 176.
gawict seed Wide
ga-yu morning 178.
gu and 179.
gu? for, therefore 180.
gQ-?u- beaver 181.
guci firewood 182.
guhdya bear 183.
gukumist eight 184.
gumds4w4 cooking pot 185.
giwa- how 186.
giydsti basket 187.
ha- east; h4-ndmi eastward 188.
hai where (destination) 189.
hau who, someone 190.
ETHNOLOGY
[Bull. 191
hau? near, suddenly
hauba- everybody
habént oak
ha-bi feather
hdé?4er, ha?dci- land, earth
hdééu how much, how many, few
ha?déanani tooth
hdéeaecE man
haéddwini navel
ha-di where, somewhere
hdidi which, what
hadvani soapweed
ha-ka-ka fir
héikémi once
ha-ka-ni fire, hot coals
haké- that way
ha-ku ready
héiku when
hé-ma-ni_ leg, thigh
ha-mi tobacco
hé-miiéuni toe
hd-mtSa-ni beard
hdma- long ago
h4-ma-ni, ha-rha?ani hail
hdémasdi?ini hand, finger
haé-me- ice
hand-mi naked
ha-ni- pine
hdinu people
hé-né hortative particle
hasé4 yucca
hdsdi?ini foot
hasgeni bone
hé?4-sti-ca town, city
h4-Suwitht shoe, moccasin
hé-tawe pollen
hdwe- snow
hawizana stalk
hd4wdi_ there
héwé- this way
hawi- here, take it
ha?4wi-édnani claw, fingernail
hd-wind quickly, immediately
hdyaét awl
hayéi there
haé-zaint hair
hé-zoni onion
he_ that one
hé-mé- all right, enough
hénatr cloud
héyady1_ turtle
héyas1 fog, mist
hé-y4 with (instrumental)
AOR, 2 LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
tor
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
dt fe
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
241.
242.
hinu I, we
hind all right
hi-séi sunflower
hisgai knife
histiya-ni arrowhead, spearhead
hisu. you
hiw4 now, today
hiyaka-¢n domestic animal
hiyA-ni road, path
hfy4-wi doorway, road
hizd?ai tree, cottonwood
hi-zani seed
hu-bdént saliva
hi-?tga dove
huséni wool
haskani yucca fruit, banana
htisd-cr cotton
hiwaka sky
hiwan4?ani
hiwi-ni milk
hécuskdwa willow
kddya_ behind; kAdyAmé4- back-
ward
eye
kdsAitl summer, year
kaé-tid’¥4 clean, pure
kindti green corn
kiwd plant
ku south; kiwdmi southward
ki-ka winter
kipéstuca lightning
ktiiwe-?5 sweet
kéd-cr antelope
k4cr_ ten
kducrgai maybe
kaka-d¥1 square, plaza
k4kana wolf
k4maska spider
kdnt cedar
k4nani heat of sun
k4sdv4-é1 rainbow
k4wina moss
ku., kiwi woman, female
kimi slightly, a small amount
ktisa last night
ku-ti, &4-ti mountain
ki-yéu old woman
kuyaitz game animal
mai almost
mags- girl
m4é-nu- a long time
méréu tortilla
masa-ni leaf
masa light
682-—611—64——_15
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
256.
257.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262.
263.
264.
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
272.
273.
274.
275.
276.
277.
278.
279.
280.
281.
282.
283.
284.
285.
286.
287.
288.
289.
290.
291.
292.
293.
294.
miéyuku nine
muséica buffalo
must soapweed
midyu- very
mi-n4 hortative particle
mi-kaica mountain lion
mé-dé- boy
m4°sei blood
madai ball
maidvana seven
magorr_ evil
thika dipper
m4-n{i word
rhd-34w1 buzzard
the- like, similar to
mé-wa mud
mé-ziér large
mi-cr clay
mi-ca hummingbird
mid& moth
mi-ga others
mina salt
thiséai ashes
mistr alkali
na yet
nace- new
naei food, lunch
nawadiya middle-aged
nd-y4i under
néizi thank you (women’s
speech)
nu: only, itself
nt-bada alone
nuwdindg separate
niya night
nti-yui- oneself
nd-’éea rubber
néti prairie dog
nau many
hAwirika egg
no down
panaci lung
pa-ni bag
pesécuru bedbug
pésa jackrabbit
péti-n4 cornmeal
pict buckskin
pi-nu- fancy, fine
piraté flag
pisé4nani skin, hide
rawad:- good
rédya rabbit
r{-pA goose
167
168
295.
296.
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
302.
303.
304.
305.
306.
307.
308.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
318.
319.
320.
321.
322.
323.
324,
325.
326.
327.
328.
329.
330.
dal.
332.
333.
334.
330.
336.
337.
338.
339.
340.
341.
342.
343.
344,
345.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
ri-wagant fat
ré-skisr small
sa back, return to previous
location
sai_ all
sai¢éu day
sd-wika money, metal
seka sure
si again, return to present
location
si-?{ ant
si-dya squirrel
sinani flesh
siyana mouse
siwd yesterday
sdcI wrongdoing
séna middle
sbiga woodpecker
sbi-ndé chicken
sbi-n4é jug
stéi_ last
sté-né meadowlark
staépaka twilight
stéti grasshopper
st4w4 popcorn
stizd- fast
stité crow
stisa siz
stimu wild honey
stiyt-n4 mosquito
stizuwi stinkbug
sdiri-n4 seashell
sdi-n4é mushroom
sgd-wasr_ rat
sgamaré- lizard
skaca frog
gS
skasku, kasku bighorn sheep
ski-n4 blackbird
ski-yu giant
skéri-n&é flour
sk4?4-dyu bullsnake
skasr fish
skirt-n4, ska-rand peas
skofi-na wagon
sp4?4e1 mockingbird
spérd4-n4 plate
spinin{f dwarf corn
spuirt-nd chickenpox
sti-na autumn
sté-c1 straight
Saska roadrunner
$4-witi parrot
i-bu?uku cotton boll
346.
347,
348.
349.
350.
351.
352.
353.
354,
355.
356.
357.
358.
359.
360.
361.
362.
363.
364.
365.
366.
367.
368.
369.
370.
371.
372.
373.
374.
375.
376.
377.
378.
379.
380.
o8l.
382.
383.
384.
385.
386.
387.
388.
389.
390.
391.
392.
393.
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
[Bull. 191
%
Suku corner
corpse
suwimi turquoise
sdmhd scattered
si-naya slow
su. narrative particle
sici- raw
siiguéad. cross, crucifix
simékawii right hand
sumi already
stist bluejay
siwi- snake
stiyind around
siza-na coyote
tA-ma five
tiyé- far
ta thus
ti-ca springtime
°i-bdydni fireplace
wadyu?uni pottery
wdgont dress, shirt
wa-nI smoke
wa-st bird snare
wast-cr dust
wi-wi medicine
wa-wdizoni root
we that one
wisdy4-ka bow
ws-?é6 thank you (men’s speech)
WAbt-stéa eagle down
wabdni_ abalone shell
wa-¢int tongue
wiisti bowl
wa-yusa duck
winuska heart
wi-sga robin
Wisi-ni nose
WispI cigarette
yar?di sand
yabast corn silk
yasbusi cottonwood cotton
yé-tu mesquite
yu? yonder
yurdsi there
yubds worm
yudaé-ca windsterm
yuké. that way
yuku away
yupé-stéa story, legend
Anthrop.Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 169
399.
400.
401.
402.
403.
404.
405.
406.
407.
408.
409.
410.
411.
yusi from there 412. yt-sbi-ni shoulder
yuwé- this way 413. yti-sktirh4 corncob
ya-bi staff of office 414. za no
ya-Gint shelled corn 415. zdiéa field
ya-ka ripe corn 416. zadya_ plains, desert
yauni stone 417. zdsdima grinding box
yasbuzani brains 418. zd&wini old
yiusadi sand 419. zdzi not
ya?dwa-ni intestines 420. zé-ni talkative
yawasti stick 421. zi what, something
ya-yu crippled 422. zikusdy4wi bridge
yu. expression of doubt 423. zind again
ya-ni song 424. gadict rabbit club
VERBS
Verbs are listed alphabetically by the verb core. The stem or
stems based on each core follow, together with the stem classification.
See ‘“‘Verb Classes’ for an outline of stem classification and “Stem
Variants” for an explanation of notations identifying stem variants.
425.
426.
427.
428.
429.
430.
431.
432.
433.
434.
435.
436.
437.
438.
439.
440.
441.
442.
443.
444,
-a to be. -a(?) Singular, Class 11-25 intransitive. -é-?E-sutr Dual,
Class 11-26 intransitive. -a-?a Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive.
-a to have, to possess. -a Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive. -4-?4
Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -4?4-SE Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive.
-?a to be closed. -A?4-?a Singular, Class 10 intransitive.
?ésu—a_ to sneeze. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-?u_ to give a flat or long object. -Au?u Irregular transitive.
-?u to dwell. -4u?u Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -4-?4u?u Dual,
Class 2—24 intransitive.
-bdi to sleep. -i-bdi Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -d4?d4ibdi Dual,
Class 2-24 intransitive. -é?é-bai?-81 Plural, Class 11—25 intransitive.
-bé-bi grandparent, a man’s mother’s mother or father’s father. -dbd-ba
Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-baidyu_ to awake, get someone out of bed. -{-badyu((?)) Class C4 transitive.
-ba’tu to sleep. -i-ba?tu Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive. -d?diba?tu
Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -é?é-ba?tu Plural, Class 11-25
intransitive.
-bdya toliyhta fire. -ibdya Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive. -fbdya-na
Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -fbdya-ne Plural, Class 10-21
intransitive.
-be to tell. -t/abe(-?) (-wv-) Class Al transitive.
-béuca to call. -u/abéuca Class Al transitive.
-be-ta to ask. -t/Abe-ta (-¥v-) Class A8 transitive.
-bi to get wood. -ubi Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
bi-ri—ant to be smooth. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive.
-biya sister-in-law. -dbiya Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-bu-cr_ to be frightened. -ubu-c1 Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
bi-pu—ant fresh, cool. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive.
btisu—a_ to have an odor. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive.
170
445.
446.
447.
448.
449.
450.
451.
452.
453.
454.
455.
456.
457.
458.
459.
460.
461.
462.
463.
464.
465.
466.
467.
468.
469.
470.
471.
472.
473.
474.
475.
476.
477.
478.
479.
480.
481.
482.
483.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
-bénaca to sew. -aubdénaca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-bonai?1 to put ina bag. -Subonai?r Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive.
bd?sri—1 winding, zigzag. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
c4-—a_ to breathe. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-cikuya to say to. -acikuya Singular, Class 10—-7 intransitive.
-CAyAWA tobeangry. -tcayawa (future -t¢ayawa) Singular, Class 5-8
intransitive. -Géayawa-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive.
-4?4-¢ayawa-nE Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive.
¢cdyi—1 to be broken. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-cdyuca to break. -A?4ucdyuca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-cé-naca to chew. -A?4uéé-naca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-c1 to arrive. -4?4e1 Singular, Class 10—-7 intransitive. -4-?4¢r Dual,
Class 2-24 intransitive.
-cidyusta to think, to worry. -Ucidyusta Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-ci-ku to be guilty. -d-ti-ku Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-cipa toneed,to want. -tcipa Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive. Transi-
tive forms conforming to Class B based on the stem -{¢fpa also occur for
first and second person objects.
-cisu. water well. -d?4-cisu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-cdcaca to cut. -A?4ucdeaca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-CaA to rain. -aéa Singular, Class 4 intransitive.
-éa to fall. -Géa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -4¢éa-na Dual,
Class 5-10 intransitive.
-Gant to stand. -déant Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-Gini to dance. -aci-ni Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-Gint yellow. -ut-éint Singular, unclassified intransitive. ki-citt it is
yellow.
éi-—a tobelch. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-cu to have ina bag. -t-éu Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -i-?iéu
Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -i-waéu Plural, Class 2-23 in-
transitive.
-ta tooth. -4?4éa Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-ta to be hot. -4-éa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-tAi?1 to close the eyes. -6?S¢4i21 Singular, Class 5-8 intrasitive.
-t4wa to steal. -t-é4wa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-td4yutha to be tired. -Gédyurba Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
-cA animal’s horn. -4ca Singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-cA to build a house. -d-?aca Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive.
-cA todo. -i-ca Singular, Class 14-4 intransitive. -f-za--na Dual, Class
14-20 intransitive. -f-za--ne Plural, Class 14-19 intransitive.
-cA tohappen. -A?dicA Singular, Class 9 intransitive.
-ca house. -deax Singular, Class 4 intransitive. -4?4-ca Plural, Class
2-23 intransitive.
-caka tosmoke. -acaka Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-da-?a to ask for something. -uidd-?a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-dé?4u grandparent, woman’s father’s father or mother’s mother. -ddd?du
Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
da?4wa—a _ to boil. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive.
-di to plant. -d4udi(?) Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -d4udi-ma
Dual, Class 9-12 intransitive. -4-w4-di-mz Plural, Class 5-9 in-
transitive.
-di to give a bulky object. -tdi(?) Class D3 transitive.
-di-na_ to be covered. -‘di-na(?) Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
Baa ares LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 171
484.
485.
486.
487.
488.
489.
490.
491.
492.
493.
494.
495.
496.
497.
498.
499.
500.
501.
502.
503.
504.
505.
506.
507.
508.
509.
510.
511.
512.
513.
514.
515.
516.
517.
518.
519.
520.
521.
522,
523.
524.
525.
526.
527.
528.
529.
530.
-di-8a to feed. -i/Adi-8a(?) Class Cl transitive.
-di-ye to get, to fetch. -tdi-ye Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-didya to hang something. -idtdya Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-d¥a_ tocatch. -i/Adya(?) Class C3 transitive.
-d¥a todescend. -dd¥a (-dd¥a) Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-dy4. to possess an animal. -‘@dyé- or -‘4)dv4.8e Singular, Class 7-15
intransitive.
-dyad¥1 to fight. -idyadyt Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive.
-dyaSi to fast. -tdvaSr Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -t-?ddyakr
Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. --wAadya’r Plural, Class 2-23 in-
transitive.
-dy4wa tostab. -{/Ady4wa Class Cl transitive.
-dvi-wa to be helpful. -tidy4-wa(?) Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-d¥u tocost. -fdyu Singular, Class 14 intrancitive.
-d¥u toarrive. -é-dy¥u Plural, Class 11—25 intransitive.
-d¥u_ to know, to be aware of. -dudyu Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive.
-dyimi toremember. -t-/4:d¥im1 Class B6 transitive.
-dyimica tolearn. -audyumica Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-dyimicuwl to forget. -t-/4-dyimicuwi Class B4 transitive.
-d¥ima man’s brother. -ddyima Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-dyusi to be afraid. -udyusr Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
dys—A4n1 to be lazy. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-gi tolook. -igd (-ika) Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-giya to sit. -tgtya Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -tgtiya-ha
Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive.
-giya to place, to send, to sell. -i/Agiya Class Cl transitive.
-gécati to blossom. -Agécatr Singular, Class 1 intransitive.
hdédu—a to yawn. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-hima fo believe. -tihima Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-k4- to hear. -dkdé- Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
kdéyi—1 to be broken. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-kdi to be full, satisified. -ukdéi (-bkat) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-ka1 ftoliedown. -ikat (fut. -igai) Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
-kaéa tosee. -t/Akaéa (-Vv-) Class A2 transitive.
-kazi to heal. -t/dkazi((?)) Class A4 transitive.
-ku to bite. -aku Class B1 transitive.
-ku togo. -éku Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive.
-ku to be located. -aku (-iku) Singular, Class 1-16 intransitive.
-ku-mi_ to bring. -diku-mi(?) Class D3 transitive.
-kupawA to chop. -ikupAwa Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-ikupawa-na Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -fkupawa-nEe Plural,
Class 10-21 intransitive.
-kuya todo. -ékuya (fut. -éguya) Singular, Class 11-25 intransitive.
kd-—anr to bered. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-ka mouth. -t-ka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-kaica to hit. -6-/4-kaica Class Al transitive.
-kiya to wipe. ~t-kaya Class A7 transitive.
-ki-ni friend. -é4ukt-ni Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-kui wife. -Adukui Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-kfiica man’s sister. -dktica Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-ktimind string. -ukimin4 Singular, Class 4 intransitive.
-kirt-né kidney. -d4uktrt-né Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
kita—1 smoke, billowing dust. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
172
531.
532.
533.
534.
535.
536.
537.
538.
539.
540.
541°
542.
543.
544.
545.
546.
547.
548.
549.
550.
551.
552.
553.
554.
555.
556.
557.
558.
059.
560.
561.
562.
563.
564.
565.
566.
567.
568.
569.
570.
571.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
-ma togo. Unclassified intransitive, occurring only in the hortative mode.
?j-ma go.
-ma- thigh. -4-ma- Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-ma-ci to betrue. -dima-cr Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdima-e1
at ts true.
-maka daughter. -A4maka Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-m4-zini to help. -t-mé-zdni(?) Class D3 transitive.
-mu-cA to thunder. -Aumt-ca Singular, Class 9 intransitive.
-mi¢éu toe. -d-mtiéu Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-mudyuca to kill. -G/Amudyuca Class Al transitive.
mura—1 dented. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-muSA beard. -4-mu8a Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-mdmd grandfather, grandchild. -dumdméd Singular, Class 7-15 intransi-
tive.
-mé-tr son. -4mé-t1r Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-tha house, to dwell. -A4-na Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive. -4?4-tha
Dual, Class 2—24 intransitive.
-mhaci waist. -tmhatr Singular, Class 4~3 intransitive.
-tmnma-d¥a_ to pick fruit. -ttmh/m4-d¥a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-tha-pa palm of hand. -drha-pa Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-masdi hand, finger. -Athasdi(?) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-mna to leave, emerge. -trha Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -{-tha
Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -é-tha Plural, Class 11-25 intransitive.
-na eye. -A-na Singular, unclassified intransitive. kA-na his eye.
-na- to becloudy. -ina- Singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-naéat stomach. -t-naéat Singular, Class 4~3 intransitive.
-nddyiwi to light a fire. -d&nddyiwi(?) Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-Anddyiwi-ma Dual, Class 10-22 intransitive. -dndd¥iwi-me
Plural, Class 10-21 intransitive.
-ndmati seat, nest. -dndmdtr Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-némaca to stop, rebuke. -u-/é-ndétmhaca Class Al transitive.
-ndsgdi head. -dndsgdi Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-nata to buy. -inata Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-nata tocook. -dinata Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive.
-nawant tobe mean. -4-nawant Singular, Class 12-27 intransitive.
-ndwe man’s mother’s brother, sister’s son. -A-ndéwe Singular, Class 7-15
intransitive.
-nd-ya mother, aunt. -d4nd-ya Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-ni to know, be acquainted with. -t/dni((?)) Class B5 transitive.
-ni to go, to walk. -a&-ni Singular, Class 6-3 intransitive.
-ni-ca to pull. -t-nd-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-naisdyu father, father’s brother. -dnaisdyu Singular, Class 7-15 in-
transitive. -Anaisdyu-Se Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive.
-naza to be healthy. -tn/naza(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-Gn/naza?a-na Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive.
-nésa to look, to peer. -in/nésa Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive.
-neta to say. -dineta Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-ni body. -infi Singular, Class 14—4 intransitive.
-nutt lower leg. -d4unuttr Class 1-1 intransitive.
-pdniustu to be thirsty. -fpdéniustu Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-dipdniustu Dual, Class 2-24 intransitive. -diydpdniustu Plural,
Class 2—23 intransitive.
-péni tobedry. -i-pdni Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
Anthrop.PaP- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 173
572.
573.
574.
575.
576.
577.
578.
579.
580.
581.
582.
583.
584.
585.
586.
587.
588.
589.
590.
591.
592.
593.
594.
595.
596.
597.
598.
599.
600.
601.
602.
603.
604.
605.
606.
607.
608.
609.
610.
611.
612.
613.
614.
615.
616.
617.
-pasdy’u_ to be tied. -dpasd¥u Singular, Class 7-13 intransitive.
-pasi tobe dark. -Apast Singular, Class 6 intransitive.
-pE toeat. -upe Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -A-?abe Dual, Class
2-24 intransitive. -d-?apE Plural, Class 2—23 intransitive.
péta—a tobe cracked. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive.
-pt forehead. -tpr Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
piséa—1 flat, spread out. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-pt-caA to blow. -ti-pti-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-pa toenter. -Uupa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-pakaca totouch. -t/d4pakaca Class Al transitive.
-sA difficult. -d&usa Singular, Class 6 intransitive.
-sé to draw water. -ausé Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-sipa eyelash. -isipA Singular, Class 14—4 intransitive.
-sukuca to kick. -G/4sukuca Class Al transitive.
-sume?esta to teach. -{/Asurne?esta(-) Class D1 transitive.
-sbi-ca to whistle. -Usbi-ca Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-sbdea_ to string beads. -tsbéca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-stéca to squeal, make an animal noise. -t-stéca Singular, Class 1-3
intransitive.
sti-—a to swallow. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive.
sétisu—A to cough. Type B, singular, Class 1—1 intransitive.
-sdi foot. -dsdi(?) Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
sdi.—1 bowl-shaped. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-sdya tosuck. -i-sdya Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-sdyirt to be brown. -Uisd¥i1r1 Singular, Class 6 intransitive.
-sgu-cuct to drool, slobber. -t-sgi-cuct Singular, Class 13-28 intransi-
tive.
-sgumasa_ to hide. -tisgumaSa Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-ska to drink. -dska Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive. -Aska Dual,
Class 2-24 intransitive. -Aska-ta Plural, Class 2-23 intransitive.
skdst—1 to be hard. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
skiré—1 spherical. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-ské-?a¢a1_ to turn around. -aiské-?acar Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
skéti—1 round. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-spika to paint. -i-sptka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-spa-cA to push. -ispa-caA Class Cl transitive.
-spa?dkaca to knock at the door. -t-sp4?4kaca Singular, Class 1-1
intransitive.
-stayA to be cold. -distaya (future -disdaya) Singular, Class 1 intransi-
tive.
-stayA to be breezy. -éstaya (future -ésdaya) Singular, Class 10 in-
transitive.
-sti to give a liquid. -{/Asti(?) Class D3 transitive.
-sti-ca city, town. ~A?4-sti-ca Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-stu to die. -astu Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-$a tostep. -48A Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-SA toclose. -d?4-8a Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-Se name. -4-3e Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-86 tobe white. -48é6 Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-S1 knee. -aSi Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-S{-cr to be hospitable. -4-Si-cr Singular, Class 8-14 intransitive.
-Su to be wet. -aSu Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
Suku—1 square. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
174
618.
619.
620.
621.
622.
623.
624.
625.
626.
627.
628.
629.
630.
631.
632.
633.
634.
635.
636.
637.
638.
639.
640.
641.
642.
643.
644.
645.
646.
647.
648.
649.
650.
651.
652.
653.
654.
655.
656.
657.
658.
659.
660.
661.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Sipa—a to spit. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-saca to name, to call ones name. -isaca (-Vv-) Class C1 transitive.
s4t—a torn. Type B, singular, Class 1 intransitive. s4t—1 torn.
Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
siwi—1 crooked. Type B, singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-ta to kill. -duta Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive. -duda-pa Dual,
Class 9-12 intransitive. -4-wata-wa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive.
-tA-nica towork. -Ut&-nicA Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive. -Uté-niza-na
Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive. -iwatd-niza-ne Plural, Class 5-9
intransitive.
-tidya back. -‘4tidya Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdtidya his
back.
-tigu to remove many objects. -utigu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-tika-8a to climb. -ttika-8a Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-tikuya to cry. -attkuya (future. -atiguya) Singular, Class 1-3 in-
transitive.
-ti8a totalkto -attSa Class A2 transitive.
-tu-ni to know. -Utu-ni Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-t4 to put in, to write down. -it4 Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-t4 to be full. -5-t&4 Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-t4 to test, try. -t-/4-t4 Class Al transitive.
AGA 0 step on. -{-ta(-) Class C2 transitive.
-ta toopen. -4?4-+a Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-tady1 to stand up. -d-tadyr Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-ti to give a granular substance. -{/Ati(?) Class D8 transitive.
-tu-dyu fence. -A-tu-dyu Singular, Class 10 intransitive.
-wicasayA to stir. -GwdcaSaya Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
wéka—a _ to spill. Type B, singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-wakuica to marry. -iwakuica Singular, Class 13-28 intransitive.
-wa:sa tobe sick. -tiwa-sa(?) Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-wast to attack, pick a fight. -duwa-st Singular, Class 9-11 intransitive.
-wa:sd¥u to watch, guard. -twa-sdyu Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-waWl face. -iwawr Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdwaw1 his
face.
-wi neck. -dwi Singular, Class 1—1 intransitive.
-wicl chest. -4witt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-wiéd-ca to listen to. -t/dwiéd-caA Class Al transitive.
-wisbota to loosen, untie. -twisbota Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-wiska blue, green. -dwiska Singular, Class 6-3 intransitive.
-wi-stiye to be happy. -{fwi-stiye(?) Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-wigstkuya to scold. -twiStkuya Class A2 transitive.
-wi-za neck. -dwi-za Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
wdka—a _ to move, shake. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-w4 to kill (plural object) -Gw/w4 Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-witl toapproach. -Gwat1 Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-watl tohaveaturn. -(-watt Singular, Class 3-27 intransitive.
-wi-é1 tongue. -dwdé-ér1 Singular, Class 4-3 intransitive.
-wadva_ togather something. -iwadya(?) Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-wAka to dress. -Gw/waka Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-wanE to go hunting. -iw/wane (future -tiw4-ne-) Singular, Class
5-8 intransitive.
-wasd4, tobe sour. -d4wasd4 Singular, unclassified intransitive. kdwasd4
ait is sour.
Anthrop; 22) LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 175
662.
663.
664.
665.
666.
667.
668.
669.
670.
671.
672.
673.
674.
675.
676.
677.
678.
679.
680.
681.
682.
683.
684.
685.
686.
687.
688.
689.
690.
691.
692.
693.
694.
695.
696.
697.
698.
699.
700.
701.
702.
-wati man’s male in-law. -&wati Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-wi child. -A-wi Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-wi-éa claw, fingernail. -4?4wi-éa Singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
winti—1 fast. Type B, singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-wi?sa to fall. -0Q-wi?Sa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive.
-wisI nose. -AwiSt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-wi-tEyA to worship. -dw/wi-teya (future -iwi-deya) Singular Class 5-2
intransitive. -tw/wi-deya-pa Dual, Class 5-10 intransitive.
-tiw/wi-deya-wa Plural, Class 5-9 intransitive.
-yi to skin an animal. -ty4& Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive. -ty4--na
Dual, Class 1-18 intransitive. -ty4--ne Plural, Class 1-17 intransi-
tive.
-yi to be born. -fyd4 Singular, Class 14-4 intransitive.
-yaka to burn something. -dyaka Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-yamhastu to be hungry. -fyarhastu Singular, Class 10-7 intransitive.
-yanikuya to tell, command. -i/A4yanikuya Class Cl transitive.
yata—1 to be weak. Type B, singular, Class 10-6 intransitive.
-yd-t1 sharp. -fyd-t1 Singular, Class 13 intransitive.
-yu hard. -dyu Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-yu to go. -é?éyu Dual, Class 11-26 intransitive.
-yi-kam1 to wait for. -{/4y0-kam1 Class D6 transitive.
-yutayA heavy. -dyttaya (future -4yitaya) Singular, Class 1-1
-ya-?a to promise, to loan. -fy4-?a Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive.
-yaska to sweep. -4y/yaska Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-yéina to find. -{/4yéima Class C7 transitive.
-Yéipa tolook for. -{/4yéipa Class C2 transitive.
-yéisiya toeat. --yéi8iya Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-yutid’i-ca to rest. -tyicéid¥i-ca Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-yi-mht arm. -4yt-rht Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-yupi ear. -4yupr1 Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-yuska tail. -d4yuska Singular, Class 1 intransitive.
-yi-spt shoulder. -4yti-spt Singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-yuta tosing. -ty/ytta Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-za_ to say. -°za(?) Singular, Class 7-13 intransitive. -Aza(?) Dual,
Class 2-24 intransitive. -azi?i-ya Plural, Class 2-23 intransi-
tive.
-za?anikuya to preach. -tza?anikuya (future -tiza?aniguya) Singular,
Class 5-8 intransitive.
-z4ipa shadow. -Azdipa Singular, Class 1 intransitive.
-24-?azi to swim. -aizd-?azi(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
-zé-su to dream. -dizé-su Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-zi to lie down. -aizi(?) Singular, Class 5-8 intransitive.
zu—v (zQ-n-) to go. Type B, singular, Class 1-1 intransitive.
-ziwaA to pay. -f-ztiwa(-) Class Cl transitive. -aiztiwa(-) Singular,
Class 5-8 intransitive.
-24:Ciwa to awake. -izd-éGwa Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive.
-7a-6A to fall. -t-za-éa Singular, Class 1-3 intransitive.
-z5 husband. -4-z5 Singular, Class 7-15 intransitive.
-zacaA torun. -izdcA Singular, Class 4-5 intransitive.
176
703.
704.
705.
706.
707.
708.
709.
710.
CHA,
712.
713.
714.
715.
716.
reve
718.
(eur
720.
721.
722.
723.
724.
725.
726.
727.
728.
729.
730.
731.
732.
733.
734.
735.
736.
737.
738.
739.
740.
7A.
742.
743.
744,
745.
746.
747.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
AFFIXES AND CLITICS
?. Second person hortative. 114H
-a- Reflexive-reciprocal. 301
-4?a- Passive voice. 302A
-a- Passive voice. 302B
-?g Plural subject. 502K
-?u Verbal auxiliary dual subject.
e- Third person indicative and negative. 121J 122J
c- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113C 116C
ci- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113B 116B
¢c- Third person indicative and negative. 121H 122H
¢- Fourth person subject with third person object, indicative and negative.
131B 132B
ci- Third person indicative and negative. 121I 1221
ci- First person indicative. 101B
¢é- Third person dubitative. 123C
é4?- Third person dubitative. 123F
-Gadyaya Continuative action. 401G
é- Third person dubitative. 123D
é& Second person hortative. 114D
éu- Second person subject with first person object, indicative, negative,
dubitative, and future hortative. 151B 152B 153B 156B
e- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113A 116A
ec4?- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113D 116D
¢a- First person subject with second person object, dubitative, and future
hortative. 143B 146B
d- Third person dubitative. 123G
d- Second person hortative. 114F
-de Plural conditional. 601B
-di Locative-instrumental clitic.
di- Third person dubitative. 123B
di- Fourth person subject with third person object, dubitative. 133A
di- Second person hortative. 114G
di- Third person subject with second person object, hortative. 174B
-dika Locative-instrumental clitic.
-dimhi_ Benefactive.
dy- Third person dubitative. 123A
dvya- Third person dubitative. 123E
-dyanu Narrative past tense clitic.
-dvé-mi Pluralizing clitic.
-d¥r Dual subject. 501C
dvid- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113F 116F
dyidi- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113G 116G
dyidi- Third person subject with second person object, dubitative and
future hortative. 173B 176B
dyu- Second person subject with first person object, indicative, negative,
dubitative, and future hortative. 151A 152A 153A 156A
dysz- Second person dubitative and future hortative. 113E 116E
dydz- Third person subject with second person object, dubitative and
future hortative. 173A 176A
g- Third person indicative and negative. 121A 122A
ga- Third person indicative and negative. 121E 122K
Antbropj; *?- LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 177
748. gu- Second person subject with first person object, hortative and negative
hortative. 154A 155A
749. gdd- Second person indicative and negative. 111F 112F
750. gddi- Second person indicative and negative. 111G 112G
751. gédi- Third person subject with second person object, indicative and
negative. 171B 172B
752. gd3z- Second person indicative and negative. 111E 112E
753. gdz- Third person subject with second person object, indicative and
negative. 171A 172A
754. k- Third person indicative and negative. 121C 122C
755. k- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104C 105E
756. ka- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104A 105C
757. kdé?- Third person indicative and negative. 121F 122F
758. ka?- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104D 105F
759. -ku Continuative action. 401D
760. -kuyA Continuative action. 401A
76. ke-) Third person indicative and negative. 121D 122D
762. ka- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104B 105D
763. ku- Second person subject with first person object, hortative and negative
hortative. 154B 155B
764. -ma Remote state. 403
765. -meE Plural subject. 502K
766. -mi Benefactive.
767. -mi Direction toward.
768. -motr Dual subject. 501E
769. -rmha Verbal auxiliary suffix.
770. -rthasA Plural subject. 502F
771. -masutr Dual subject. 501F
772. mé.- Augmentative.
773. -mE Plural subject. 502D
774. -mxr_ Suffixed to place names to indicate inhabitants of that place.
775. -mi Benefactive.
776. -tha Dual subject. 501D
777. n- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104G
105G 106C
778. n- Future tense. 201A
779. -ndmi Direction toward.
780. -nani Nominalizer.
781. -ne Conditional. 601A
782. -nE Plural subject. 502B
783. -nE Unfulfilled action. 402B
784. ni- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104E
105A 106A
785. ni- Future tense. 201B
786. -ni Benefactive.
787. -ni Nominalizer.
788. -ni Direction from.
789. ni?- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
1041 105I 106E
790. ni?- Future tense. 201E
791. -nikuya Continuative action. 401B
792. -nu- Conditional. 602
178
793.
794.
795.
796.
ote
798.
799.
800.
801.
802.
803.
804.
805.
806.
807.
808.
809.
810.
811.
812.
813.
814.
815.
816.
817.
818.
819.
820.
821.
822.
823.
824.
825.
826.
827.
828.
829.
830.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
néd- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
104K 105K 106G
néd- Future tense. 201G
nédi- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
104L 105L 106H
nédi Third person subject with first person object, hortative, negative
hortative, and future hortative. 164B 165B 166B
-notr Dual subject. 501B
néz- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
104J 1053 106F
néz- Third person subject with first person object, hortative, negative
hortative, and future hortative. 164A 165A 166A
néz- Future tense. 201F
n- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative. 104H
105H 106D
n- Future tense. 201C
-nE Plural subject. 502A
-nE Unfulfilled action. 402A
-nE Verbal auxiliary conditional.
ni- First person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
104F 105B 106B
ni- Future tense. 201D
-ni Nominalizer.
-na Dual subject. 501A
p- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124C 125C 126C
p- Second person hortative. 114A
pa- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124E 125E 126E
p4?- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124F 125F 126F
pi- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124A 125A 126A
pi- Second person hortative. 114B
pi?- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124G 125G 126G
-pa Dual subject. 501H
p- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124D 125D 126D
pi- Third person hortative, negative hortative, and future hortative.
124B 125B 126B
pi- Fourth person subject with third person object, hortative, negative
hortative, and future hortative. 134 135 136
ré-- Diminutive.
s- First person indicative. 101C
-sA Verbal auxiliary plural subject.
-sE Plural subject. 502M
si- First person indicative. 101A
-si_ Locative-instrumental clitic.
si?- First person indicative. 101F
-sa Continuative action. 401F
séd- First person indicative. 101H
séz- First person indicative. 101G
Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 179
831.
832.
833.
834.
835.
836.
837.
838.
839.
840.
841.
842.
843.
844.
845.
846.
847.
848.
849.
850.
851.
852.
853.
854.
855.
856.
857.
858.
859.
860.
861.
862.
863.
864.
865.
866.
867.
868.
869.
870.
871.
872.
873.
874.
875.
876.
877.
878.
879.
880.
sé-
sé-
sé-
sc-
sc-
yz.
SCl-
sti-
sdy-
sdy-
sdy-
sdy-
sd¥i-
sdvi-
sg-
sg-
sg-
sg-
sg-
sga-
sga-
sk-
sk-
Indefinite subject. 181C
First person negative. 102J
Second person negative hortative. 115J
Indefinite subject. 181D
First person negative. 102H
Second person negative hortative. 115H
Third person subject with first person object, negative. 162B
Third person subject with second person object, negative hortative.
175B
First person negative. 1021
Second person negative hortative. 115I
First person negative. 102G
Second person negative hortative. 115G
Third person subject with first person object, negative. 162A
Third person subject with second person object, negative hortative.
175A
First person negative. 102B
Second person negative hortative. 115B
First person negative. 102A
First person indicative. 1011
Second person negative hortative. 115A
Indefinite subject. 181A
Third person subject with first person object, indicative. 161A
First person negative. 102E
Second person negative hortative. 115K
First person negative. 102C
Second person negative hortative. 115C
skdé?- First person negative. 102F
ska?- Second person negative hortative. 115F
sk-
sk-
sk-
sku-
sku-
st-
sti?-
sti-
Indefinite subject. 181B
First person negative. 102D
Second person negative hortative. 115D
First person indicative. 101J
Third person subject with first person object, indicative. 161B
First person hortative and negative hortative. 1040 1050
First person hortative and negative hortative. 104P 105P
First person hortative and negative hortative. 104Q 105Q
s- First person indicative. 101D
si- First person indicative. 101E
8- Second person indicative and negative. 111C 112C
§- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104M 105M
-86
-SE
Nominalizing clitic.
Plural subject. 5021
-§i Locative-instrumental clitic.
-S1
Plural subject. 502J
Si- Second person indicative and negative. 111B 112B
S- First person hortative and negative hortative. 104N 105N
s- Second person indicative and negative. 111A 112A
sa-
First person subject with second person object, indicative, negative,
hortative, and negative hortative. 141A 142A 144A 145A
-sanu Narrative past tense clitic.
-sutl
Dual subject. 501G
s- Second person indicative and negative. 111D 112D
180
881.
882.
883.
884.
885.
886.
887.
888.
889.
890.
891.
892.
893.
894.
895.
896.
897.
898.
899.
900.
901.
902.
903.
904.
905.
906.
907.
908.
909.
910.
911.
912.
913.
914.
915.
1G:
917.
918.
919.
920.
921.
922.
923.
924.
925.
926.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
$a- First person subject with second person object, indicative, negative,
hortative, and negative hortative. 141B 142B 144B 145B
t- First person dubitative. 103C
t- Third person dubitative. 123J
-ta Continuative action. 401E
-ta Plural subject. 502C
ta?- First person dubitative. 103D
-td-nt Nominalizer.
-tE Plural negative. 603
ti- First person dubitative. 103A
ti?- First person dubitative. 103H
-tikuya Continuative action. 401C
téd- First person dubitative. 103F
tédi- First person dubitative. 103G
tédi- Third person subject with first person object, dubitative. 163B
téz- First person dubitative. 105E
téz- Third person subject with first person object, dubitative. 163A
t- Third person dubitative. 123H
¢- Fourth person subject with third person object, dubitative. 133B
t- Second person hortative. 114C
ti- First person dubitative. 103B
ti- Third person dubitative. 123I
-wa Numeral suffix.
-wA Plural subject. 502G
-wE Plural subject. 502H
-wE Unfulfilled action. 402C
-wi Benefactive.
-wi Nominalizer.
-ya Numeral suffix.
-yA Plural subject. 502L
LOANWORDS
?amd-pu_ pillow. Spanish almohada.
?araBigu- apricot. Sp. albaricoque.
?ard-ru plow. Sp. arado.
?ara-sa rice. Sp. arroz.
?ayund- lent, fast. Sp. ayunar.
?isbd-ri sword. Sp. espada.
?isdi-pa stove. Sp. estufa.
Bagé-ta leather. Sp. vaqueta.
Banpé. basin, tin cup. Sp. bandeja.
Bé-ra bullet. Sp. bala.
BA-sA_ drinking glass. Sp. vaso.
Bend4-na window. Sp. ventana.
BidaBé- beets. Sp. betabel.
BU-Gi buggy.
BuiyasI oxen. Sp. buey.
ba- bread. Sp. pan.
bé-ni cloth. Sp. pajio.
Ame oT P ~=«LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
No.
927.
928.
929.
930.
931.
932.
933.
934.
935.
936.
937.
938.
939.
940.
941.
942.
943.
944.
945.
946.
947.
948.
949.
950.
951.
952.
953.
954.
955.
956.
957.
958.
959.
960.
961.
962.
963.
964.
965.
966.
967.
968.
969.
970.
971.
972.
973.
974.
975.
976.
977.
978.
979.
ba-sku feast, holy day. Sp. pascua.
bé-su straw. Sp. paja.
béla pear. Sp. pera.
bici-tr pig. Nahuatl pitzoil.
bisé-ri blanket, rug. Sp. pisar.
bisgd-ri_ church officer. Sp. fiscal.
bla-sa city. Sp. plaza.
dd4bi-pu governor. Zuni ta-pu-pu.
dé-sA cup. Sp. taza.
dasaSti-na taxes. Sp. tasacién.
didaét priest. Nahuatl totatzin.
dumi-ku Sunday. Sp. domingo.
dunasi. automobile. Sp. automédvil.
dyé-nda_ store. Sp. tienda.
aayé-ta biscuit. Sp. galleta.
gagawa-t1 peanut. Sp. cacahuate.
gahé-ra drummer. Sp. cajero (?).
gahti-na box. Sp. cajén.
gamaé-tu bed. Sp. cama (?).
gand-st1 basket, nest. Sp. canasta.
gané-ru. sheep. Sp. carnero.
gapé. coffee. Sp. café.
gasi-k1 high priest, king. Sp. cacique.
gé-silu jail. Sp. carcel.
gi-su box. Sp. caja.
gawa-yu horse. Sp. caballo.
gawiya-ra_ herd of horses. Sp. caballada.
gayawart-sa barn. Sp. caballeriza.
guBé-nta church. Sp. convento.
gu-li cabbage. Sp. col.
gumunird- jail. Sp. comandancia.
gunZu- mattress. Sp. colchon.
gurd- corral. Sp. cerral.
guy4-ri yoke, horse collar. Sp. collera.
haBi- soap. Sp. jabén.
hied-ntr giant. Sp. gigante.
hua John. Sp. Juan.
huisist Thursday. Sp. jueves.
ht-runa outdoor oven. Sp. horno.
kasdi-ra Mexican, Spanish-American. Sp. Castilla.
kisd- stew. Sp. guisado.
lé-ba, ré-ba coat. Sp. leva.
leli-sa watch, clock. Sp. reloj.
m4a-dist T'wesday. Sp. martes.
madi-ya hammer. Sp. martillo.
mé-gurist Wednesday. Sp. miércoles.
merigé-na Anglo-American. Sp. americano.
merti-ni melon. Sp. melén.
mé-sA table. Sp. mesa.
mé-stru teacher. Sp. maestro.
misakdi church. Sp. misa plus native -kAi.
mu-la mule. Sp. mulo.
mura-tu Negro. Sp. mulato.
181
182 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
980. mt-sa cat. Sp. moza.
981. naBd-hu pocket knife. Sp. navaja.
982. nardn orange. Sp. naranja.
983. nurd&-st peach. Sp. durazno.
984. nuZuwé-nu Christmas. Sp. Nochebuena.
985. regesi. cream. Sp. requesén.
986. resd- prayer. Sp. rezar.
987. rey4-tu rawhide rope. Sp. reata.
988. rigust rich. Sp. rico.
989. ra-ku crazy. Sp. loco.
990. ri-nisr Monday. Sp. lunes.
991. rusd-yu beads. Sp. rosario.
992. sagisdd4-na sacristan. Sp. sacristén.
993. sanpi-ya watermelon. Sp. sandia.
994. sandiyé-ku St. James. Sp. Santiago.
995. sd-waru Saturday. Sp. sdbado.
996. semi-tu bread. Sp. semita.
997. seré-su cherry. Sp. cereza.
998. siBiyu. bird. Sp. silbar.
999. sirawé- plum. Sp. ciruela.
1,000. siyé-ta chair. Sp. silleta.
1,001. sunpé-ru_ soldier. Sp. soldado.
1,002. wa-gast cow. Sp. vaca.
1,003. wanisSu- harness. Sp. guarniciones.
1,004. ward- something saved. Sp. guardar.
1,005. yé-nast Friday. Sp. viernes.
1,006. 4Zi-ri chili. Sp. chile.
1,007. Ziriyi- whip. Sp. chirrién.
INDEX TO VOCABULARY
abalone 380 antelope 221
able 36 to approach 655
above 115 apricot 911
abruptly 138 arm 686
adobe 81 around 362
afraid 501 to arrive 454, 495
again 302, 423 arrow 30
alkali 266 arrowhead 195
all 298 ashes 265
allright 186, 192 to ask 488, 478
almost 237 assistance 45
alone 274 to attack 642
already 21, 359 aunt 560
also 84 automobile 939
and 18, 126 autumn 341
Anglo-American 973 to awake 433, 699
angry 450 away 397
animal 198, 236 awl 181
ant 303 ax 42
[Bull. 191
sop TP «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
baby 51
back 212, 297, 302, 624
bad 253
badger 116
bag 284
ball 251
banana 206
bark 24
barn 954
basin 918
basket 50, 134, 946
bat 87
to be 425, 517
beads 991
beans 121
bear 130
beard 159, 540
beaver 128
bee 62
bed 945
bedbug 285
beets 922
behind 212
to belch 465
to believe 508
bell 48
big 259
bighorn sheep 329
bird 998
biscuit 941
bison 244
to bite 515
bitter 75
blackbird 330
blanket 931
blood 250
to blossom 506
to blow 578
blue 649
bluebird 351
bluejay 360
bobcat 104
body 92, 350, 568
to boil 480
boll 345
bone 170
to be born 670
both 31
bow 377
bowl 11, 52, 382
bowl-shaped 592
box 417, 944, 951
boy 249
682-611—64——_16
brains 405
bread 925, 996
to break 452
breath 69
to breathe 448
breezy 606
brick 81
bridge 422
to bring 518
broken 4651, 510
brother 118, 500
brown 594
buckskin 288
buffalo 244
bug 285, 323
buggy 923
to build 473
bullet 919
bullsnake 333
to burn 671
but 22
butterfly 65
to buy 556
buzzard 256
cabbage 956
cactus 23
to call 4387, 619
can 36
car 939
cat 980
to catch 487
cedar 227
centipede 25
chair 8, 1000
cherry 997
chest 646
to chew 453
chicken 311
chicken pox 340
child 663
chili 1006
to chop 519
Christmas 984
church 955, 977
church officer 9382
cigarette 387
city 171, 608, 933
claw 179, 664
clay 260
clean 214
to climb 626
clock 969
183
184 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
to close 469, 611
closed 427
cloth 926
cloud 187
cloudy 550
club 424
coals 152
coat 968
cob 413
coffee 948
cold 605
to command 673
to cook 557
cool 4438
corn 215, 317, 339, 402, 403
corncob 413
corner 349
cornhusk 98
cornmeal 287
corn silk 389
corpse 92, 350
corral 959
correct 342
to cost 494
cotton 207, 345, 390
cottonwood 201, 390
cougar 248
to cough 590
covered 483
cow 1002
coyote 363
cracked 575
crazy 989
cream 985
crippled 409
crooked 621
cross 357
crow 319
crucifix 357
tocry 627
cup 918, 935
to cut 459
to dance 463
dark 573
daughter 534
day 299
deer 108
dented 539
to descend 488
desert 416
to die 609
difficult 581
dipper 254
to do 474, 520
dog 99
doll 651
domestic animal 198
doorway 200
dove 204
down 282, 379
to draw water 582
to dream 695
dress 370
to dress 659
drill 55
to drink 597
to drool 595
drum 54
drummer 943
dry dil
duck 383
dust 373, 530
to dwell 430, 543
eagle 105
ear 687
early 109
earring 43
earth 122, 142
east 135
eastward 135
to eat 574, 684
egg 281
eight 131
elk 120
to emerge 548
enough 186
to enter 579
everybody 139
evil 253
eye 209, 549
eyelash 583
face 644
fall 341
to fall 461, 666, 700
fancy 289
far 365
fast 318, 665, 914
to fast 491
fat 35, 295
father 564
feast 927
feather 141
to feed 484
Anthrop. Pap. LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS
female 231
fence 637
to fetch 485
few 1438
field 415
to fight 490
to find 682
fine 289
finger 162, 547
fingernail 179, 664
fir 150
fire 152
fireplace 368
firewood 129
first 71
fish 334
five 364
flag 290
flat 577
flesh 33, 305
flour 28, 332
flower 506
fly 74
fog 189
food 39, 269
foot 169, 591
imoye iL PAf/
forehead 576
to forget 499
four 106
fOx Wo
fresh 448
Friday 1005
friend 525
frightened 442
frog 328
from 97, 399
full 511, 631
game 236
to gather 658
to get 439, 485
giant 331, 962
girl 238
to give 429, 482, 607, 636
glass 920
to go 516, 531, 562, 677, 697
good 10, 292
goose 294, 348
gourd 110
governor 934
grandchild 6541
grandfather 541
grandparent 58, 432, 479
grass 14
grasshopper 316
green 649
grinding box 417
grinding stone 17
to guard 6438
guilty 456
gun 46
hail 161
hair 183
hammer 971
hand 162, 547
handkerchief 44
to hang 486
to happen 475
happy 650
hard 581, 598, 676
harness 1003
to have 426, 466, 489
hawk 89
head 555
to heal 514
healthy 565
to hear 509
heart 384
heat 228
heavy 679
help 45
to help 535
helpful 493
hen 311
here 95, 178
hide 291
to hide 596
to hit 523
holy day 927
honey 80, 321
horn 472
horned toad 90
horse 952
horse collar 960
horse herd 953
hospitable 615
hot 56, 468
house 4, 476, 543
how 133, 143
hummingbird 261
hungry 672
to hunt 660
husband 701
husk 98
185
186 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
I 191 and affix list
ice 163
immediately 180
in-law 662
intestines 407
iron 79
itself 273
jackrabbit 107, 286
jail 950, 957
John 963
jug 312
juice 77
key 16
to kick 584
kidney 529
to kill 538, 622, 654
king 949
knee 614
knife 194, 981
to knock 604
to know 496, 561, 629
lamp 9
land 142
lard 35
large 259
last 313
last night 233
lazy 502
leaf 241
to learn 498
leather 288, 917
to leave 548
leg 156, 532, 569
legend 398
legging 38
lent 914
to lie down 512, 696
life 37
light 242
to light 4385, 552
lightning 66, 219
like 257
to listen to 647
little 296
liver 27
lizard 327
to loan 680
locust 78
log 68
long ago 160
long time 239
to look 503, 513, 566
to look for 683
to loosen 648
lopsided 63
louse 347
lunch 269
lung 283
man 145
manure 29
many 280
to marry 640
mat 3
match 653
mattress 3, 958
maybe 223
meadowlark 314
mean 558
meat 33, 305
medicine 374
medicine man 88
melon 974
mesquite 391
metal 300
metate 17
Mexican 966
middle 309
middle-aged 270
milk 210
mist 189
moccasin 172
mockingbird 337
moon 93
Monday 990
money 300
month 93
morning 125
mosquito 322
moss 230
moth 262
mother 560
mountain 234
mountain lion 248
mouse 306
mouth 522
to move 653
mud 258
mushroom 325
nail 7
naked 164
name 612
soko] 2 «LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 187
to name 619
navel 146
near 138
neck 645, 652
to need 457
needle 40
Negro 979
nephew 559
nest 553, 946
new 268
night 276
nine 243
no 414
north 114
nose 386, 667
not 419
now 197
oak 140
odor 444
O.K. 192
old 418
once 151
one 32
oneself 277
onion 184
only 273
to open 634
orange 982
others 263
oven 965
oxen 924
to paint 602
palm 546
pants 13
paralyzed 409
parrot 344
to pay 698
peach 983
peanut 942
pear 929
peas 335
to peer 566
people, person 166
to pick 545
pig 930
pillow 910
pine 112, 165
pinony SE 12
place 94
to place 505
plains 416
plant 216
to plant 481
plate 338
plaza 224
plow 912
plum 999
pollen 173
popcorn 317
porcupine 34
to possess 426, 466, 489
pot 5, 1382
pottery 369
prairie dog 279
prayer 986
to preach 692
priest 937, 949
to promise 680
to pull 563
pumpkin 91
pure 214
purple 61
to push 603
to put 446, 630
quail 123
quickly 180
rabbit 107, 286, 293
rabbit club 424
to rain 460
rainbow 229
rat 326
rattle 110
raw 356
ready 154
to rebuke 554
reGumozt
to remember 497
to remove 625
to rest 685
return 297, 302
ribs 64
rice 913
rich 988
right hand 358
river 86
road 199, 200
roadrunner 343
robin 385
rock 404
root 375
rope 47, 987
round 599, 601
188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
rubber 278 snake 361
rug 931 snare 372
torun 702 to sneeze 428
snow 174
sacristan 992 soap 961
saddle 41 soapweed 149, 245
St. James 994 soldier 1001
saliva 203 somebody 137
salt 264 something 421
sand 388, 406
satisfied 511
Saturday 995
saved 1004
to say 449, 567, 691
scattered 353
to scold 651
seat 8, 553
to see 513
seed 124, 202
to sell 505
to send 505
separate 275
seven 252
to sew 445
shadow 693
to shake 653
shaman 88
sharp 675
sheep 329, 947
shell 324, 380
shirt 370
shoe 172
shoulder 412, 689
to shut 611
sick 641
side 82
similar 257
to sing 690
sister 527
sister-in-law 441
to sit 504
six 320
skin 291
to skin 669
sky 208
to sleep 431, 434
slightly 2382
to slobber 595
slow 354
small 232, 296
smoke 371, 530
to smoke 477
smooth 440
somewhere 147
son 542
song 411
sour 661
south 217
southward 217
Spanish-American 966
spearhead 195
spherical 599
spider 226
to spill 639
to spit 618
spread out 577
springtime 367
square 224, 617
squash 91
to squeal 588
squirrel 304
to stab 492
staff 401
stalk 175
to stand 462, 635
star 346
to steal 470
to step 610, 633
stew 76, 967
stick 408
stinkbug 323
to stir 638
stocking 102
stomach 551
stone 404
to stop 554
store 940
storm 395
story 398
stove 916
straight 342
straw 928
string 528
to string beads 587
to suck 593
suddenly 138
summer 213
[Bull. 191
ORT» ~=LANGUAGE OF SANTA ANA PUEBLO—DAVIS 189
sun 49
Sunday 938
sunflower 193
sure 301
to swallow 589
to sweep 681
sweet 220
toswim 694
sword 915
table 975
tail 688
take it 178
to talk to 628
talkative 420
tasty 10
taxes 936
to teach 585
teacher 976
to tell 486, 673
ten 222
to test 632
tether 6
thank you 272, 378
that 185, 376
that way 101, 153, 396
then 20
there 2, 12, 96, 176, 182, 392, 393
therefore 20, 127
thigh 156, 532
to think 455
thirsty 570
this 100
this way 103, 177, 400
three 85
thunder 536
Thursday 964
thus 366
tied 572
tilted 63
tired 471
toad 60
tobacco 157
today 197
toe 158, 537
tomorrow 83
tongue 381, 657
too 84
tooth 144, 467
torn 620
torso 64
tortilla 240
to touch 580
towel 44
town 171, 608
tree 201
trousers 13
true 533
to try 632
Tuesday 970
turkey 72
turn 656
to turn around 600
turquoise 352
turtle 188
twice 119
twilight 315
two 117
uncle 559, 564
under 271
to untie 648
up 113
very 246
vine 26
vulture 256
wagon 336
waist 544
to wait for 678
to walk 562
wall 70
to want 457
watch 969
to watch 643
water 77
watermelon 993
we 191 and affix list
weak 674
Wednesday 972
well 292, 458
west 67
westward 67
wet 616
what 148, 421
wheat 15
when 155
where 136, 147
which 148
whip 1007
to whistle 586
white 613
whitewash 59
who 1387
wife 526
190
wildeat 104
willow 211
winding 447
window 921
windstorm 395
winter 218
to wipe 524
with 190
wolf 225
woman 231, 235
wood 129
woodpecker
wool 205
word 255
to work 623
world 122
worm 394
310
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
to worry 455
to worship 668
to write 630
wrongdoing 308
to yawn 507
year 213
yellow 464
yesterday 307
yet 267
yoke 960
yonder 392
you 196 and affix list
yucca 168
yucca fruit 206
zigzag 447
LITERATURE CITED
GREENBERG, JOSEPH H.
1957.
1959 a.
Essays in linguistics.
Research. Viking Fund Publ.
Miter, Wick R.
Some notes on Acoma kinship terminology. Southwestern Journ.
Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological
Anthrop. No. 24.
Anthrop., vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 179-184.
1959 b. Spanish loanwordsin Acoma: I. Intern. Journ. Amer. Linguistics,
vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 147-153.
1960. Spanish loanwords in Acoma: II.
Intern. Journ. Amer. Linguistics,
vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 41-49.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 70
OBSERVATIONS ON CERTAIN ANCIENT TRIBES OF
THE NORTHERN APPALACHIAN PROVINCE
By BERNARD G. HOFFMAN
to
at i ln
oe = ny
et eee atte uae © ° tT 4 —=t
‘
ries —
aA)
vb -
VMOTCUUITEVL VATHOR GT ha
qgoleedt sawasA, lo casiall
i? sole
ee ate te
OF .of1 wigs't taoinoforjoy lind eit ;
; whan LP are
We) Bl OP VIIOVA. VLA TARO va CVIOITAVE oe 5 Ee
RAV IWOOT AATIDA TN TSA: Vice Pa Se i
' raul AAA ATOM 32 Gah TEEATD il
mor? s
CONTENTS
PAGE
BESTT COLL GUN Tae mas ee ar a ee ee ere lee en ei eee 195
Mvidenes tor relations hiss 222.2 es ee ae a ee 196
1. Pocaughtawonauck—Massawomeck connection_____._________- 196
2. Massawomeck-Massomack connection_..._-_____-___-_-___-_-_ 198
3. Massawomeck-Black Minqua connection_______________.___-_-_ 201
4. Massawomeck=DErie: connection... 232 soso soe cc ek 204
&. Diack Mingue-lrieequncetion®! 12 724i eh io oe Se 206
G. Arripahapa-Prie connection: == 22. 652205 2 eee ale ee 210
¢. Arrigahaga-Black Minqua connection_-..........-.......--._- 211
8. Richahecrian-Black Minqua connection___....____-.-----_____- 211
0. Hichaheerian-lirie connection... ..=—=20.222—c icc. sea ese 220
10. Richahecrian-Rickohockan connection_____-__--_-----_-___-_- 220
Hit hickohockan-Birie- connection: 222 2225229) Se Nols Peete 221
opi On Aste: eae free ae Eee dhe thay iy cae Tet Sk # eS A ae ete ee eee 221
31/0) oad: 0) SR oe Beem Sey ane nt SA Oe ee A eee ae ee ee 235
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATE
(Follows page 246)
26. Facsimile of section of Anonymous-Zufiiga map of c. 1608.
TEXT FIGURE
6: Dideram of name relationships i245 -—22 532.6 Yeo she ose 195
MAPS
4. Fascimile of section of John Smith’s map of 1612_____----_---------- 197
5. Possible Potomac route of Captain Fleet’s brother__-_------------- 201
6. Facsimile of legend of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673___--------- 203
f(« Bacsinigle of John Wederer's:map of 1672.2. 4.2. ee eee soos 205
8. Facsimile of detail of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673___--------- 213
9. Protohistoric and early historic archeological phases of the Eastern
WintbedtS Gates Sears Meee ates ees ein nk eee emi YN ae ak ope ca ee 221
10: Components of the Fort Ancient, Aspeeto = «2 22.2524 - se oS 2. 225
11. Components of the Monongahela and Shenk’s Ferry Aspects - ------- 229
122 (Components of the Iroquois Aspeet.—- 2.2. 2-22-22 22--22—— -- == 233
13. Probable distribution o£ Iroquoian tribese=:--=-2-2.-2-.-.--.---- 234
mt)
eS eS 6 ne
+ Howe
a =e = Se ye ee
A ad ee ee ee
fat ant a ee os ee
ia ee oe es *
- «see i oe
ee —
ee ee -_&
Oe ee
ee —-
ee <=
eh ea ES at le qdadt s'aantreH “atraigi A YW ielel Wi eliotn
cravewlt ait to aaa lavipoliedon' vttoteht “hao bee oboe iohee
mh hy het oe
LOOT
wt OE
ai
a Pa itdthosaant sintl-arpalM oat 2
--«-- =. dhgoonon aNpAiM sonttl-cumleebaAg
sas nea ooanios spat dbalt_cetmedadsti ee
SuoWe we /
Nah a oT
ofp puokeg alafiniry maine iS
Aytap syremoun sfayl UL
ayferryc ae au bB euoy yasRe sf" +
&i T Lt off bedi ey phate
f te ae hag : S spr Sumy fo] Yr aq
diate qpounyvan W 72 dy Z
pony np a0 puefyznk 2-9 Syd Beryat 27d TH
siaenor zed perK ern rey ep %,
YO, Patyt YL apanyinf mp +4
“SH
AL AIHA FHL FO dvAv |
OUVW FISAL SIH NIWAWIGTT NHOI Aa GIS WAAV AL AOL
206 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The Sanson map of 1656 pictures the ‘‘Eriechronons ou N. du Chat”
south of Lake Erie and west of Virginia and Maryland, although the
cartographic distortion is such that this latter fact may not be signifi-
cant. A detailed discussion of the problems involved in attempting
to draw conclusions concerning the position of the Erie by inspection
of early cartographical representations has been given by Marion E.
White (1961, pp. 40-49), who calls attention to a very important
clue. The so-called Bernou map of c. 1680 shows a legend below
Lake Erie (here called ‘Lac Teiocha-rontiong’’) reading,
This Lake is not Lake Erie, as people usually call it. Erie is a part of Chesa-
peake Bay in Virginia, where the Eries have always lived.
5. BLACK MINQUA-ERIE CONNECTION
As with the Massawomeck, there exists no indisputable evidence
to link the Black Minqua to the Erie. There does exist, however, a
considerable amount of elusive and circumstantial data which, when
considered in toto, does seem to render such a conclusion at least
plausible.
First of all, it is apparent that just as the Massawomeck of the
Smith and Lederer maps seem to fall within Erie territory, so do
the Black Minqua of Herrman’s map. Second, there seems to be
some relation between the name Erie or Eriehronon and the name
Arrigahaga as used by Printz. In this connection it should be noted
that Lewis Evans used the form Erigas on his map of 1755 (Evans,
1939, p. 13).
Above and beyond this there seem to be numerous parallels between
the history of the Erie and the Black Minqua which, when taken
together, seem to be more than mere coincidence. This best can be
seen in a comparison of the Erie and Black Minqua histories insofar
as we can reconstruct them from the sources.
According to the French, the Erie—Iroquois war began shortly
after the Iroquois defeat of the northern Algonquian, the Huron, the
Tionontati, and the Neutral; that is, between 1651 and 1653. The
Iroquois account of the cause for this war, as given to the French at
Onondaga, was that
The Cat Nation had sent thirty Ambassadors to Sonnontouan, to confirm
the peace between them; but it happened, by some unexpected accident, that a
Sonnontouahronnon [Seneca] was killed by a man of the Cat Nation. This
murder so incensed the Sonnontouahronnons, that they put to death the Ambas-
sadors in their hands, except five who escaped. Hence, war was kindled between
these two Nations, and each strove to capture and burn more prisoners than its
opponent. [De Quens, 1657; in Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 42, p. 177.]
sho] AP APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 207
The Onondaga also blamed the Huron for this, claiming that those who
took refuge among the Erie “stirred up this war which is filling the
Iroquois with alarm” (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 41, p. 83).
Whatever the cause, the war started unauspiciously for the New
York Iroquois. In 1653, apparently, the Erie took and burned a
frontier town of the Seneca, cut to pieces the rearguard of 80 picked
men of a Seneca expedition returning from Lake Huron, and captured
and burned a great captain of the Seneca and one of the Onondaga
(ibid., vol. 41, p. 81). Curiously, the French accounts of this early
phase of the Erie—Iroquois war make no mention of the Susquehan-
nock or Andaste, but Printz wrote in this year, as previously men-
tioned, that war had broken out between the Arrigahaga and Sus-
quahannoer.
In 1654 the Iroquois secured their rear by concluding a peace
treaty with the French, at which time they announced:
Our young men will wage no more warfare with the French; but, as they are
too warlike to abandon that pursuit, you are to understand that we are going to
wage a war against the Ehriehronnons (the Cat Nation), and this very summer we
shall lead an army thither. The earth is trembling yonder, and here all is quiet.
[Le Mercier, 1655; in Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901, vol. 41, p. 75.]
While preparations were being made for this invasion, Erie war parties
still lurked around the New York towns, even ambushing three men
within 1 day’s journey of Onondaga (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901,
vol. 41, p. 75).
The Iroquois attack, when it finally was carried out in August of
1654, was massive, involving some 700 (or 1,200) men. After its
entry into their country the northern Ehriehronon abandoned their
frontier towns and retreated some 5 days before taking refuge in the
fortified town of Rique, inhabited by the Riquehronnon (Rigueron-
non), who apparently had just experienced an attack by the ‘‘Anda-
stogueronnons” or Susquehannock. Here the Erie beat off the initial
attacks in heavy fighting. Finally, carrying their canoes before
them as shields and then using them as ladders to scale the walls,
the Iroquois stormed the fort. The Eries’ gunpowder supply be-
coming exhausted, the defense collapsed, and the defenders were
massacred to the number of 2,000 men, plus women and children
(ibid., vol. 41, p. 121; vol. 42, pp. 178-179, 187-188, 191, 195; vol. 45,
p. 209).
At approximately the same time, that is, in 1654 or 1655, a battle
took place between a party of Black Minqua and Englishmen from
Virginia in which the latter suffered a defeat of some proportions.
I also want to mention briefly what happened among the Black Minquas further
in the [interior of the] country, with 15 individual Englishmen whom they had
taken prisoners; from which one can learn of the horrible cruelty of the Minquas.
208 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
It happened that the English of Virginia carried on war against these Minquas.
When the English now came to these savages, marching 2 or 3 hundred men strong,
with a few [small] field cannon, they pitched their camp a short distance from the
dwellings of the above-mentioned savages. But these savages are somewhat
cleverer in building, than our own river Indians who live closer to us, using pali-
sades around their dwellings. Therefore the English did not run, precipitously
upon them, but first fired a few cannon [balls against their fort]. Then the English
did not know a word about it, before the savages had surrounded the English,
were in their rear and drove them into flight, killing some of them and brought
home with them 15 prisoners, whom they later, after a lapse of a few days, mar-
tyred to death wretchedly and unchristianlike. Because some of these prisoners
were of noble birth and of some importance and value, the English offered for each
one of them a few 100 florins for ransom; but the savages did not care for ransom
or a sum of money, but seemed to be more anxious to exact their revenge and
satisfy their anger on these poor prisoners. They therefore erected a high plat-
form, placing large piles of bark below it, upon which they poured all kinds of
pitch, bear-fat, et talia, etc. Through this they wanted to indicate that whatso-
ever kind of drink the English wanted to pour out for them, that they themselves
would now have to imbibe. They also erected a post in the earth for each pris-
oner, around which they also placed piles of bark and poured fat thereupon, just
as has been stated before. Then they took the prisoners out to undergo their
punishment. They first brought them up on the high framework, who were bound
around their waists with long slender iron chains; then they put fire to the bark,
lying below, and later, shoved one prisoner after the other down into the fire,
which burnt with terrible violence. When they had been tormented somewhat
in this fire, then the savages pulled them out of it.
Then they bound the said prisoners to the above-mentioned poles, put fire
also to that bark in which they had to dance, until they were practically halt
roasted. Nor did they want that any of them should lose his life in the fire,
because they wanted to inflict upon them as much suffering as possible; wherefore
they pulled the prisoners out again, placing them in front of themselves. Then
they brought forth their doctor of medicine, whom they otherwise called the
devil-chaser (why he has this name we will learn to know in the next following
chapter). He took his knife and cut each one of the prisoners right over the fore-
head from one ear to the other, then he took the skin and pulled it backward on the
neck or the throat, then he cut the tongue out of the mouths of all the prisoners.
On one of them he wanted to prove his mastery and cure him again, if there was
any one of them who wanted to live, and then that one would escape further
punishment, which his other comrades still would have to stand, but there was
no one of them who wanted to live. Then the devil-chaser cut all the fingers
off the prisoners and threaded them upon a string, which he delivered to their
sachem or ruler, who tied them around his neck. When this was done the devil-
chaser cut all their toes off, which he also delivered to their sachem. These he
tied around his legs at the knees. The sachem carried them on his body until
the flesh rotted away, but when the flesh had rotted off and dried away, he scrapes
the bones clean and white, when he threads them anew upon a ribbon and carries
them afterwards continually on his body, to show his great courage,—the greater
skeleton bones these Minqua sachems carry, the braver warriors they are supposed
tobe. Then they brought forth fifteen bundles of reeds, like reeds here in Sweden,
which were saturated in fat. Of these they bound a bundle on the back of each
prisoner, turned them towards Virginia, set fire to the bundles, and told them to
run home again, where they had come from, and relate to their countrymen, how
well they had been treated and entertained among the Black Minquas. They
Ano Bo} we APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 209
also sent good guides with them, whom the boys followed with a great noise, shot
at them with their quarrels [blunt arrows] until the one fell here and the other
there. Such a miserable departure and end these poor people had, from which
we can observe the awful cruelty of the Minquas. These Minquas are of two
kinds, Black and White Minquas.
The author of the preceding passage, Peter Lindestrém, follows
it with another indicating some familiarity with these Indians.
Besides I further want to relate about the bloodletting of the savages and their
wonderful medicines, which i have seen at least a hundred times among these
savages.
When the savage undertakes to march a long journey, the first day he has
marched, in the evening, when he strikes camp, he makes up a fire, takes a piece
of flint as long as a finger which he has prepared and fitted for this purpose, sharp
as a razor, with this he cuts himself all over his body into the deepest flesh, on his
arms, thighs and legs, the depth of a finger, according to the depth of the flesh,
deeper or less, standing then before the fire to shake off the blood, which runs off
him, as if one had butchered an ox. When he has allowed as much blood to run
off as he thinks proper, then he takes a kind of ointment, which he smears over his
body, wherever he has cut himself. Before morning, it is healed over and run
together, and blue streaks remain after it just as when one burns oneself with
powder, wherefore the savages appear entirely striped and streaky and especially
the Minquas. This is now [something about] the blood letting and cutting of the
savages, from which one can observe that they are patient and not tinder-skinned.
When now the savage has thus removed some blood, he may march and run as
fast and as far as he wants to, he will not tire. [Lindestrém, 1925, pp. 241-245.]
At almost the same time (1656) the records of the Virginia Assembly
report that,
. . Many western and inland Indians are drawne from the mountaynes,
and lately sett downe near the falls of James river, to the number of six or seaven
hundred. [Virginia Assembly, 1823 a, p. 402.]
After due consideration the Assembly resolved to remove these foreign
Indians from the borders of the colony by peaceful or martial means,
charging Col. Edward Hill to carry out the resolution and to enlist
the aid of the Pamunkey chief Tottopottomoy. From later sources
which describe Tottopottomoy’s defeat and death at the hands of
these Indians it would appear that they were Siouan and not Iroquoian.
However, these two battles—with the Black Minqua and with the
Nahyssan and Mahock—almost certainly are not unrelated (see
“Richahecrian-Black Minqua Connection’’).
Decisive as their capture of Rique may have been, it did not end
entirely the Erie threat, for in September of 1655 the Onondaga
delegation to Quebec, “representing all the upper Iroquois Nations,”
asked ‘for French Soldiers, to defend their villages against the inroads
of the Cat Nation, with whom they are at open war” (Thwaites, ed.,
1896-1901, vol 42, pp. 49, 53). By 1656, however, the tide of war had
gone against the Erie to such an extent that some surrendered vol-
untarily, and the Iroquois again proclaimed their total destruction
210 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
(ibid., vol. 44, p. 153). The French Jesuit De Lamberville, writing
from the Seneca country in 1682, reported that another surrender
took place about 1672, in which
Six hundred men, women, and children of the nation of the chats, near Virginia,
surrendered voluntarily, for fear that they might be compelled to do so by force.
[De Lamberville, 1682; in ibid., vol. 62, p. 71.]
A similar statement, apparently referring to an event which occurred
about 1680, was made to the Governor of Maryland in 1681 by an
Onondaga and a Cayuga.
Another Nation, called the Black Mingoes, are joined with the Sinnondowannes,
who are the right Senecas; that they were so informed by some New York Indians
whom they met as they were coming down. They told them that the Black
Mingoes, in the coming to the Sinniquos, were pursed by some Southern Indians,
set upon and routed, several of them taken and bound, till the Sinniquos came
unto their relief. [Hanna, 1911, p. 16.]
One additional type of evidence which may be cited in support of
the proposition that the Erie were one and the same with the Black
Mingua is the fact that, while the historical sources indicate that
both of these groups were ‘‘destroyed” by the Iroquois, the Iroquois
themselves claimed only to have destroyed the Erie in this general
area at this time. This argument rests, of course, on the assumption
that if the Black Minqua had not been identical with the Erie the
Iroquois would have made the fact clear. One thing is indisputable:
the Iroquois, and particularly the Seneca, were never particularly
modest in their claims of martial prowess and triumphs.
6. ARRIGAHAGA-ERIE CONNECTION
Evidence for the identity of the Arrigahaga, mentioned by Printz,
with the Erie is largely linguistic. The material already considered
indicates that the name ‘‘Arrigahaga’”’ is used in such a context that
its synonymy with the name ‘‘Black Minqua”’ is indicated strongly;
the possible identity of the Black Minqua with the Erie has also been
discussed. Above and beyond this it can be argued that the term
‘“‘Arrigahaga”’ is a cognate of the term ‘“Hrie,’’ having an Iroquoian
stem meaning ‘‘people of” (Hodge, 1907, pt. 1, p. 921).
The evidence for this derives, first of all, from Lewis Evans’ use of
the form ‘‘Eriga” as a variant for ‘‘Erie’’ in the commentary published
in connection with his map of 1755. The second line of evidence de-
rives from the known use of the ending ‘‘-haga,’”’ as well as cognate
forms, in known Iroquois tribal names (Hodge, 1907, pt. 1, pp. 224,
924: 1910, pt. 2, pp. 87, 507-508):
Aniakahaka-Caughnawaga name for Mohawk
Kaniengehaga-Mohawk name for Mohawk
Kuyukuhaga-Mohawk, for Cayuga
An 0] 2 APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 21]
Kuenyuguhaka-Tuscarora, for Cayuga
Cheroenhaka-Nottaway, for Nottaway
Tshotinondowaga-Seneca, for Seneca
No"towaka-Tuscarora, for Seneca
Ani- Nundawegi-Cherokee, for Seneca
From this evidence it would seem that the original form of the name
given by Printz was probably “Erigahaga.”’
7. ARRIGAHAGA-BLACK MINQUA CONNECTION
Direct evidence for the identity of the names Arrigahaga and
Black Minqua stems from the occurrence of these names in cir-
cumstances indicating their synonymy. This material has already
been discussed under ‘‘Massawomeck-Black Minqua Connection.”
8. RICHAHECRIAN-BLACK MINQUA CONNECTION
The identity of the Richahecrian Indians who invaded Virginia in
1655 long has been the subject of controversy and discussion. This
group has been associated, on different grounds, with the Erie,
Cherokee, Westo, Huchi, and Yuchi. However, few of these studies
have been based upon the original documentary sources and several
most crucial references have been ignored completely.
The earliest document pertinent to the Richahecrian question con-
sists of an Act passed by the Virginia Assembly on March 10, 1656,
and preserved in the Randolph Manuscript (Virginia Assembly
[1642-62]) in the Jefferson Collection of the Library of Congress, and
published in Hening’s “Statutes at Large.”
Act XV
Whereas information hath bin given that many western and inland Indians
are drawne from the mountaynes, and lately sett downe near the falls of James
river, to the number of six or seaven hundred, whereby vpon many seuerall
considerations being had, it is conceived greate danger might ensue to this collony,
This Assembly therefore do think fitt to resolve that these new come Indians be in
noe sort suffered to seate themselves there, or any place near vs it having cost so
much blood to expell and extirpate those perfidious and treacherous Indians which
were there formerly, It being so apt a place to invade vs and within those lymitts
which in a just warr were formerly conquered by us, and by vs reserved at the
last conclusion of peace with the Indians, In persuance whereof therefore and due
respect to our own safety, Be it enacted by this present Grand Assembly, That the
two vpper countyes, vnder the command of Coll. Edward Hill, do presently send
forth a party of 100 men at least and that they shall endeavour to remove the
said new come Indians without makeing warr if it may be, only in a case of their
own defence, alsoe strictly requireing the assistance of all the neighbouring Indians
to aid them to that purpose, as being part of the articles of peace concluded with
vs, and faileing therein to look duely to the safety of all the English of those parts
by fixing of their arms and provideing ammunition, and that they have recourse
the Governour and Councill for further direction therein. And the Governour and
Councill are desired to send messages to Tottopottomoy and the Chickahomynies
212 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
and other Indians and to treate with them as they in theire wisdoms and dis-
cretions shall think fitt [Hening, 1819-1823, vol. 1, pp. 402-403].
An action of this same Assembly passing sentence upon Colonel
Hill, for some ‘‘weakness” during a “Jate expedition against the
Indians,” which is usually interpreted as constituting a sequel to the
passage just quoted, was passed down between March and December
1656.
Debate and consideration of the charge and defence of Coll. Edward Hill by
the general and unanimous assent and vote of both houses without any con-
tradiction hath been found guilty of these crimes and weaknesses there alleaged
against him and for the vindicating themselves from any imputation of his crimes
and deficiencies have ordered that his present suspension from all offices military
and civil that he hath had or may have continue & be made uncapable of resti-
tution but by an Assembly, and that he be at the charge of whats alreadie expended
in procuring a peace with the Richahecrians and if the Governour or Councel
shall find any nearer way to effecting thereof that it shall be acted at the said
Coll. Hills proper cost and charge (Bland MS., in Hening, 1809-23, vol. 1, pp.
422-423).
In addition we must consider Lindestrém’s description of an
English defeat at the hands of the Black Minqua, and two passages
appearing in Lionel Gatford’s ‘Publick Good without Private In-
terest. . .” (1657).
The Planters have turned some of the Indians out of their places of abode and
subsistence, after that the Indians have submitted to the Colony, and to their
government, and have taken up their own lands, after the custom, used by the
Colony. As they did otherwise also very unchristianly requite the service which
one of the Indian kings did them in fighting against other Indians, that were
presumed to be enemies to the English, and to draw towards them, to do them
mischief. For that, when the said King desirous to show his fidelity to the
English, if not in obedience to some of their commander’s orders, did adventure
too far with his own Indians, in the pursuit of those other Indians, and thereby
lost his life in that action, as some report, though others thought him to be taken
alive by the enemies. His wife and children that were by him, at his expiring,
recommended to the care of the English . . . were so far from receiving the favour
and kind usage, merited by their father, that they were wholly neglected, and
exposed to shift for themselves.
And though it be alleged by some, as to the former part of this grievance, that
the portion of land which was taken from the said King, before his death, by an
English colonel was acknowledged openly in court, yet ’tis generally believed,
and by some stoutly asserted, that the said King was affrighted and threatened
into that acknowledgement by the said Colonel. ...
. . . The Planters [of Virginia] did lately, viz. Anno 1656, (when a numerous
people of the Indians, more remote from the Colonie, came down to treat with
the English about setling of a Peace, and withall a liberty of trade with them)
most perfidiously and barbarously (after a declaration of their desires and in-
tention) murther five of their Kings, that came in expectation of a better reception)
[sic] and bronght [sic] much Beaver with them to begin the intercourse of the
commerce. [Gatford, 1657, pp. 6-8.]
eenee td APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 213
From a comment made by Lederer, this Indian chief would seem
to be Tottopottomoy and the battle in question apparently took
place above the junction of Pamunkey River with Totopotomoy Creek.
The next day falling into Marish grounds between Pemaeoncock and the head
of the River Matapeneugh, the heaviness of the way obliged me to cross Pemaeon-
The Yeads of thefe twa
Rivers, Proceed and ifr
forth out of low Marfhy grad,
and not out of 4ills or
Mountaines as other
River doe,
pe
é ¥ y40¢ fo samoicey- 27
MIONVHVdLV YN
7):
to]
v
Mar 8.—Facsimile of detail of Augustine Herrman’s map of 1673.
214 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
cock, where its North and South branch (called Ackmick) joyn in one. In the
Peninsula made by these two branches, a great Indian king called Tottopottoma
was heretofore slain in battle, fighting for the Christians against the Mahocks
and Nahyssans, from whence it retains his name to this day. [Lederer, 1958,
p. 10.]
Lederer depicts the site of this battle on his map of 1672 with the
legend “‘Tottopotoma” at the fork in question. Since this name
appears in a similar location on the Augustine Herrman map of 1673
(map 8) it would seem that it was generally believed by the con-
temporary Virginians that Tottopotomoy met his death here.
From a reference appearing in the Maryland Archives for 1661 it
would appear that the Nahyssans mentioned by Lederer were still in
northern Virginia at this time. This reference derives from the
consideration given by the General Assembly of Maryland, sitting at
St. John’s in St. Marys County, to a petition by the Susquehannock
Indians for assistance and aid.
Tuesday the 23th April
At a Grand Comittee of both howses
It is ordered M.t Edward Lloyd and M.t John Bateman Coll. W.™ Evans
M.t Thomas Manning M.' John Brewer and M.* George Vtye doe drawe up an
Acte impowring the Governor and Councell in the Intervall Betweene this As-
sembly and the next to rayse what forces they in their discrecon shall finde
necessary for the Assistance of the Sasquehannough Indians ag.t the Cynaco or
Naijssone Indians that have lately killed some English in Patapsco River [which
runs into Baltimore Bay] that they doe rayse by equall Assessment vpon the
Freemen of this Province and the Charge of the warre and that the said Comittee
doe agree and ascertayne the wages and pay of the Souldiery in the Acte and that
they doe meete by two of the Clock in the Afternoone to drawe up the Acte
Thursday the second of May
An acte Impowring the Governor and Councell to Rayse forces and maytayne a
Warre without the Province and to ayde the Sasquehannough Indians
Whereas it doth appeare to this p'sent Generall Assembly that this Province
is in Eminent danger by a warre begun in itt by some forreigne Indians as it
hath been made appeare by credible informacon given of a person lately killd
and of others that are probably cutt off by these forreign Indians And that in
humane probabillity our neighbour Indians the Sasquehannoughs are a Bullwarke
and Security of the Northerne parts of this Province And that by former treatyes
with that nacon they have very much assured vs of their affeccons and friendship
And that they expected the like from vs, And by their treatyes it was agreed
Assistance should be granted to each oth[er] in tyme of danger And vpon their
severall late Applicacons to vs to that purpose Ayde hath been promis[ed] them
accordingly.
It is Enacted and be it enacted [by] the Lord Proprietary of this Province by
and with the advice and consent of the vpper and lower howJ[se] of this ptsent
General [Assembly] that the Governor with the advice and consent of the Councell
ame ko}? APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 215
have power to leauy and rayse by presse or otherwise fifty able men with Armes
and Provision and all things necessary for them to be sent to the Sasquehannough
Forte for the end aforesaid And the proporcon of the said Souldiers to be raysed
out of the severall Countyes as followeth. (vizt) out of the County of St. Marys
Eleaven, out of Calvert County fifteene out of Charles County seaven, out of
Anne Arrundell eleaven out of Kent three, with one Interpreter a Captaine and
a Chirurgeon. And for the pay of the officers and Souldiers aforesaid to be
proporconed as followeth vntill the Souldiers retourne To the Comander in
cheife Six hundred pounds of tobacco in Caske p moneth To the Interpreter six
hundred p moneth to the Leiuetennant four hundred p moneth To the Serjeant
three hundred p moneth and to the Chirurgeon foure hundred p moneth and to
every private Souldier two hundred and fifty pmoneth. And be it further enacted
by the authority aforesaid that for the defraying of the Charge of the said warre
and all charges incident to itt That the Governor and Councell are hereby im-
powred to leauy by waye of Assessment p pole according to the vsuall Custome
out of this Province And in the Intervall of Assemblyes to rayse what forces
they in their disrecon shall thinke necessary against the Cynacs or Nayssone
Indians or any other Indians that shall be found to have killed any of the In-
habitants of this Province or that have or shall disturbe the peace thereof. And
the Charges to be defrayed as aforsaid This Acte to continue and be in force
for two yeares or the next Generall Assembly which shall first happen
The Lower howse The Vpper howse
haue Assented haue Assented
Will Bretton Clk John Gittings Clre:
(General Assembly of Maryland,
Upper House, 1883).
The passage ‘‘Cynaco or Naijsonne Indians” in one instance, and
that of ‘“Cynacs or Nayssone Indians or any other Indians” in another,
can be interpreted to mean either that the name ‘‘Cynaco” was a
synonym for the name ‘“‘Naijssone’”’ or ‘‘Nayssone,” or that the Mary-
land officials and the Susquehannock were uncertain which of two
groups of Indians may have been involved in the incident at Patapsco
River. However, the term ‘‘Cynaco” or ‘‘Cynacs” has numerous
cognates including ‘‘Cinnigos,” ‘“‘Cynikers,”’ ‘“Sannagers,”’ ‘“Senacaes,”’
“Senequas,”’ ‘‘Seneques,” ‘‘Senneks,” ‘Sinacks,” ‘Sinica,” ‘Sin-
nagers,” ‘Syneck,” and ‘‘Synicks’” (Hodge, 1910, pt. 2, pp. 507-
508), all of which are variants of a general Dutch and English term
for Jroquoian-speaking peoples (and thereby similar to the Swedish
term ‘‘Minqua’”’). According to Hewitt, the term ‘‘Seneca”’ became
“the tribal name of the Seneca by a process of elimination which
excluded from the group and from the connotation of the general
name the nearer tribes as each with its own proper native name be-
came known to the Europeans” (Hodge, 1910, pt. 2, p. 504).
It easily can be demonstrated, however, that the Nahyssan were a
Siouan-speaking group, and that they are therefore separate and
682-611—64—18
216 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
distinct from a ‘‘Cynaco” group. Lederer, in his discourse on his
second expedition of 1670, states:
From the fifth, which was Sunday, until the ninth of June, I travelled through
difficult ways, without seeing any Town or Indian; and then I arrived at Sapon,
a Village of the Nahyssans, about an hundred miles distant from Mahock, scituate
upon a branch of Shawan, alias Rorenock-River; and though I had just cause to
fear these Indians, because they had been in continual Hostility with the Chris-
tians for ten years before; yet presuming that the Truck which I carried with
me would procure my welcome, I adventured to put my self into their power,.. . «
[Lederer, 1958, pp. 22—23.]
In a separate passage Lederer associates these ‘‘Saponi” or “Na-
hyssan”’ with a number of other tribes or groups.
These parts [the Piedmont of Virginia] were formerly possessed by the Taccz
alias Dogi; but they are extinct; and the Indians now seated here, are distin-
guished into the several Nations of Mahoc, Nuntaneuck, alias Nuntaly, Nahyssan,
Sapon, Monagog, Mongoack, Akenatzy, and Monakin, & c. One language is
common to them all, though they differ in Dialects. [Lederer, 1958, p. 10.]
At a considerably later date, Alexander Spotswood (1882-85, vol.
2, p. 88), Governor of the Virginia Colony, stated:
. . . Ll engaged the Saponie, Oconeechee, Stuckanox and Tottero Indians, (being
a people speaking much the same language, and therefore confederated together
tho’ still preserving their different Rules).
At a still later date William Byrd, while helping survey the dividing
line between Virginia and North Carolina, recorded a number of
Saponi names for creeks emptying into the middle Roanoke, as
follows: Moni-seep or Shallow Water; Massamoni or Paint-Creek;
Ohimpa-moni, Ohimpamony, or Jumping [Fish?] or Fishing Creek;
Yaypatsco, Yapatoco, or Beaver Creek; Tewahominy, Tewaw-hom-
mini, Tewakominy, or Tuskarooda Creek; Hicootomony, or Turkey
Buzzard River; Wicco-quoi or Rock Creek. An analysis of these
names (see table 1) clearly indicates their Siouan nature. In addi-
tion, Tutelo has been firmly established, through more recent evi-
dence, as being Siouan (Byrd, 1929, pp. 158, 164-166, 168; Sturtevant,
1958).
From this analysis it would seem that the Maryland General As-
sembly of 1661 was apprehensive of attack by either a Siouan or an
Iroquoian group. It also is obvious that the battle in which Tot-
topottomoy met his death was separate and distinct from that in
which the English of Virginia met defeat at the hands of the Black
Minqua. The question thus arises as to whether all the statements
which generally have been taken to refer to the ‘“Richahecrian”
or ‘‘Nahyssan” and “Mahock’’ defeat of the English refer to two
separate battles or to one.
Anthrop. Pap.
"No. 70]. APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 217
TaBLE 1.—Comparative analysis of Byrd’s Saponi place names }
English Byrd’s Saponi Tutelo Dakota Hidatsa
Sialloweesee oe sees seep .
Weber ees 2S moni- mani mini ee
midi
Greg Be Bes tok -moni ee :
TRAC ies = Bs ee oe (Ra ke taksita P am
watpa
Jumps 262 sS220 ee eres
?
tp eee Cera ON A Sh eh att ga wihoi, hoghan mua
bisok4
Beavers ot Qube cis. Yayp Yaop tcapa mirapa
Yapa
Turkey Buzzard___| Hicooto-
Pipeane eo! =, Pee Ue re WAT mayutkai wakiyedai
wayotkai
Barnbee ae oe ee ee massa-
ROC ere eat bete aw wicco(?)
1 Hale (1884), Frachtenburg (1913), Byrd (1929, pp. 164-169).
The statements which actually exist are as follows:
Statement A.—A group of ‘‘western and inland Indians,” 600 or 700
strong, is reported in the spring of 1656 to have moved from the
mountains and established itself at the falls of the James. Colonel
Hill is sent to persuade its members to remove, or to force them to do
this. Tottopottomoy and other Indians are asked to give aid. These
‘western and inland Indians” are not named.
Statement B.—An act passed by the Virginia Assembly and recorded
at the close of its session in December 1656 cashiers Colonel Hill for
his ‘‘erimes and weaknesses.” He also is ordered to bear the cost of
securing a peace with the Richahecrians.
Statement C_—During this same session the Virginia Assembly con-
sidered a number of petitions for “compensation for losses suffered
during the late expedition” against the Indians (Virginia Assembly
(1656)). These petitions were not referred to by later historians.
Mention is also made of the former careless killing of Indians.
Statement D.—According to Gatford, writing in 1657, the Virginia
colonists murdered five Indian ambassadors who had ‘‘come down to
treat with the English about setling of a Peace, and withall a liberty
of trade with them” in 1656. Beaver is mentioned.
Statement H.—Gatford also states that an Indian King, name not
given, had advanced too rashly in the pursuit of ‘other Indians”
and was either killed or captured.
218 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Statement F.—Lederer, writing in 1672, stated that the Indian King
Tottopottomoy was killed in a battle with the Mahocks and Nahyssan
on the Pamunkey River. This location is confirmed on the Herrman
map.
Statement G.—Lindestrém, probably citing an incident which
occurred before his departure from America in October 1655, describes
an English defeat at the hands of the Black Minqua.
Statement H.—The Maryland General Assembly and the Susque-
hannock Indians express concern in 1661 about an Indian group, either
Nahyssan or ‘“Cynaco,” which is threatening the borders of the
colony near present-day Baltimore.
From the evidence given in these eight references it would seem that
Statement G (from Lindestrém) indisputably refers to an Iroquoian
eroup, while Statement F indisputably refers to a Siouan group.
It also seems probable (though not indisputable) that Statements A
and E also can be associated with this Siouan group. Since the
Indian group in Statement E is distinguished from that in D, this
later statement may apply to the Black Minqua of G. We thus have
Statements B and C of uncertain attribution, and we have tentatively
established that:
(1) The group which established itself at the falls of the James and defeated
Tottopotomoy on the Pamunkey was comprised of the Mahock and Nahyssan.
(2) The Black Minqua defeated the English and later suffered the loss of
five ambassadors.
From internal evidence—namely, the fact that Lindestrém left in
October of 1655 (Lindestrém, 1925, p. xxiv), as well as the fact that
Gatford dates the murder of the ambassadors as occurring in 1656—
the order of events would seem to be as indicated in (2) above. This
gives us a clue as to why Hill was cashiered. Considering the case
in historical perspective, it seems unlikely that Hill would have been
prosecuted merely because Tottopottomoy had disobeyed orders
and had been cut off, or even if he had been defeated in an open battle
with the Black Minqua. (Hill does not seem to have suffered losses
in the Tottopottomoy episode, and Indian allies are not mentioned
in Lindestrém’s account.) What might have been sufficient and full
reason for a court-martial may have been Hill’s conduct when the
Indian ambassadors were murdered, which presumably caused a
new outbreak of the war. These ambassadors were ‘‘Richahecrians”’
but quite likely they were also Black Minqua. The fact that Hill was
not cashiered for weaknesses displayed in connection with the Mahock
and Nahyssan is significant. Statement B, and possibly Statement C
as well, probably is to be associated with the Black Minqua.
This interpretation of an important episode in Virginia history must
ae PoT P APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 219
be compared with the more usual version which seems to have origi-
nated with Burk.
Whilst the assembly were employed in these wise and benevolent projects,
information was received that a body of inland or mountain Indians, to the num-
ber of six or seven hundred, had seated themselves near the falls of James river,
apparently with the intention of forming a regular settlement. Some movements
were at this time noticed among the neighboring tribes, which seemed to indicate
something like a concert and correspondence with these strangers; and the minds
of the colonists always alive to, and apprehensive of, Indian treachery, were
unusually agitated on this occasion. The place these Indians had made choice
of, was another source of disquiet. It was strong and difficult of access, alike
calculated for offensive and defensive operations; and they recollected the immense
trouble and expence that had been incurred in extirpating the tribes which
formerly dwelt in that place. At the conclusion of the last peace with the Indians,
this station was considered so important, that its cession was insisted on, as the
main pledge and security of peace; and it had hitherto continued unoccupied
as a sort of barrier to the frontiers in that direction. Under all these circum-
stances, they could not see it, without anxiety, occupied by a powerful band of
hardy warriors, who perhaps were only the advance guard of a more formidable
and extensive emigration.
The measures of the assembly in removing this ground of alarm were prompt
and vigourous.* [fn. printing Virginia Assembly (1642-1662) pp. 111-112]. One
hundred men were dispatched under the command of Edward Hill, to dislodge
the intruders. His instructions were to use peaceable means only, unless com-
pelled by necessity; and to require the assistance of all the neighboring Indians,
according to the articles of the late treaty. ‘The governor was at the same time
directed to send an account of this invasion to Totopotomoi, and desire that his
influence should be exerted in procuring the immediate co-operation of the friendly
tribes.
It is difficult to form any satisfactory conjecture as to the motives of the extraor-
dinary movement directly against the stream and tide of emigration. It was
certainly a bold step to descend into the plain, in the face of an enemy, whose
power they must have heard of, and which could scarcely fail of inspiring astonish-
ment and awe; and to take the place of warlike tribes, whom the skill and destruc-
tive weapons of the whites had lately exterminated and swept away.
The scanty materials which the state records have preserved of Indian affairs,
throw little light on this subject. But though they do not present this people in
all the various relations of peace and war, we generally see them in one point of
view at least; and are often able by induction, to supply a considerable range of
incident and reflection. In the second session of assembly colonel Edward Hill
was cashiered, and declared incapable of holding any office, civil or military,
within the colony, for improper conduct in an expedition against the Richahe-
crians. We are not told whether the offence of Hill was cowardice, or a willful
disobedience of the instructions he had received. There is however reason to
believe, that he was defeated, and that the Rechahecrians maintained themselves
in their position at the falls by force; for the governor and council were directed
by the assembly to make a peace with this people, and they further directed that
the monies which were expended for this purpose, should be levied on the proper
estate of Hill.* [fn. printing Virginia Assembly, et al (1606-92), p. 200].
From other sources almost equally authentic, we learn that the aid demanded
of the Indians was granted without hesitation. Topopotomoi marched at the
head of an hundred warriors of the tribe of Pamunkey, and fell with the greater
220 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
part of his followers, gallantly fighting in this obstinate and bloody encounter
(Burk, 1804-16, vol. 2, pp. 104-107).
Burk’s account seems to have constituted the primary source for
most later authors writing on this battle, although a few also have
employed Gatford or have cited Hening’s printing of the Virginia
Assembly documents. Lindestrém’s account of a battle between
the English of Virginia and the Black Minqua, as well as the material
from the Maryland Archives and part of Lederer’s statements, has
generally been ignored.
9. RICHAHECRIAN-ERIE CONNECTION
The identity of the Richahecrian with the Erie is based, in part,
upon De Lamberville’s comment that ‘‘six hundred men, women, and
children of the nation of the chats” once lived “near Virginia,” and,
in part, upon some degree of similarity in the names. The latter
evidence is not completely convincing, but it is still suggestive.
Richalbemncrianees === a see English (Va. Assembly, 1656)
Armcahapaee. Site oe Gils Swedish (Printz, 1653)
irgead £0 eget ee ea English (Evans, 1755)
Priehwts tronons. 52 ued Huron (Thwaites, ed., 1896-1901,
vol. 18, p. 235)
Ericehte!rononl) J28 0 9uL Iroquois (ibid., vol. 21, p. 191)
Erieh ONO 29 ela fe EE Troquois (ibid., vol. 41, p. 81)
Rigue FOnNom es uo. £ Iroquois (ibid., vol. 47, p. 59; vol. 50,
p. 117)
Rbie + sarrhonon = 2222 2S Huron (ibid., vol. 8, p. 115)
10. RICHAHECRIAN-RICKOHOCKAN CONNECTION
In his report on his second expedition of 1670, Lederer stated, in
connection with a visit at ‘““Akenatzy”’:
. .. I have heard several Indians testifie, that the Nation of the Rickohockans,
who dwell not far to the Westward of the Apalataean Mountains, are seated upon
a Land, as they term it, of great Waves; by which I suppose they mean the
sea-shore.
The next day after my arrival at Akenatzy, a Rickohockan Ambassadour,
attended by five Indians, whose faces were coloured with Auripigmentum [‘‘gold
paint’’] (in which Mineral these parts do much abound) was received, and that
night invited to a Ball of their fashion; but in the height of their mirth and dancing,
by a smoke contrived for that purpose, the Room was suddenly darkned, and for
what cause I know not, the Rickohockan and his Retinue barbarously murthered.
[Lederer, 1958, p. 26.]
Lederer also shows the ‘‘Rickohokans” on his map of 1672 as being
west of the present-day site of Roanoke, Va., and apparently west
of the Great Valley of Virginia on the New River. This location
is also due west of the principal Virginia settlements of 1656 and only
a short distance, therefore, from what was then taken as the borders
Po» APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 22]
of the colony. The Rickohockans were thus close enough to the
Virginia Colony to have been the Richahecrians. The similarity in
names is also suggestive.
11. RICKOHOCKAN-ERIE CONNECTION
The identity of the Rickohockan with the Erie is suggested by the
general similarity of geographical location and by linguistic evidence.
The first name easily can be broken down into ‘‘ricko-” and ‘‘hockan’”’
and compared to the name “Trigue” or “rique” in ‘“riquehronnon,”’
the Iroquois name for the Erie of Rique, and to the stem “haga” or
‘“‘haka’”’ meaning “people of.” Thus the name ‘‘Rickohokan”’ possibly
can be interpreted as an Iroquois name meaning ‘‘People of Rique.’’
CONCLUSIONS
From the material which has been considered here it is apparent
that Iroquoian tribes played an important part in the early history of
Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, and that a particularly im-
portant group in this respect included the Erie, Black Minqua,
Z
Map 9.—Protohistoric and early historic archeological phases of the Eastern United States.
Aspects: 1, Mouse Creek; 2, Dallas; 3, Large Log; 4, Duck River; 5, Cumberland; 6, Kincaid; 7, Angel; 8,
Late Fort Ancient; 9, Clover; 10, Iroquois; 1/1, Shenk Ferry; 12 , Allegheny; 18 ,Clarksville ;14, Hillsboro;
15, Pee Dee; 16, Potomac Creek.
222 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
or Massawomeck, who lived west of the Siouan tribes occupying the
Virginia Piedmont. As far as we can determine, these Jroquoian
tribes were established on the headwaters of the Potomac and on the
upper Ohio drainage area. In light of this probable distribution it is
pertinent to ask to what degree this does or does not show correlation
to known archeological complexes in the area.
The following protohistoric and early historic archeological units
(see map 9) are pertinent in this connection:
Mississipp1 PATTERN
Middle Mississippi Phase
Fort Ancient Aspect
Madisonville Focus
Anderson Focus
Baum Focus
Feurt Focus
Clover Focus
WooDLAND PATTERN
Applachian Phase
Shenk’s Ferry Aspect
Shenk’s Ferry Focus
Stewart Focus
Monongahela Aspect
Monongahela Focus
Luray Focus
Northeastern Phase
Iroquois Aspect
Madison Focus
Genoa Fort Focus
Factory Hollow Focus
Lawson Focus
Ripley Focus
Whittlesey Focus
Tioga Focus
The distributions of the various aspects are shown on the accompany-
ing series of maps (Griffin, 1943; 1952; MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 51-54;
Mayer-Oakes, 1955; Morgan, 1952, pp. 93-98; Ritchie, 1951; Schmitt,
1952, pp. 62-70; Witthoft, 1951; 1955 (Personal communication)).
The Fort Ancient Aspect, located in the middle Ohio Valley (see
map 10), constitutes the most northeastern division of the Mississippi
Pattern; a major cultural division centered in the Mississippi drainage
and characterized by intensive agriculture, relatively superior pottery
of distinctive style, palisaded fortified villages, flat-topped pyramids
or cones, and town plazas. Culturally, the Mississippi Pattern stood
in roughly the same relative position to the neighboring Woodland
Pattern as ‘river bottom farming culture” stands to “hillbilly culture”’
in modern America. Although the Fort Ancient peoples were mar-
ginal to the spectacular developments of the Mississippi Pattern as
abi a APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 223
it evolved along the Mississippi and Tennessee Rivers, their culture
still was unmistakably Mississippian and non-Woodland. Further-
more, it had considerable homogeneity and occupied a large area
including ‘‘a considerable proportion of southern Ohio, northern
Kentucky, southeastern Indiana, and, to an as yet uncertain extent,
the Kanawha Valley in West Virginia” (Griffin, 1943, pp. 206, 257-
260, 268-269, table x1v; 1952).
Within the Fort Ancient Aspect a number of smaller and even more
homogeneous units (foci) may be discerned. These foci (Madison-
ville, Anderson, Baum, Feurt, Clover) seem to be distinguishable
partly upon regional and partly upon temporal grounds. The Madi-
sonville and Clover foci are the latest. Historic trade objects such as
copper bells and snakes, copper and brass spirals, pendants and bells,
iron adzes and beads, blue glass beads, etc. have been recovered from
the Madisonville and Clover components. Commenting upon these
remains, Griffin states that
. it does not appear that any Fort Ancient focus had any considerable
antiquity, and the probability is that the Madisonville Focus is only 250 to 350
years old. Even if the historic materials had not been buried in undoubted
association with typical Madisonville artifacts in the Madisonville Component,
this focus, on the basis of comparative analysis, could be shown to have been of
no great age. [Griffin, 1943, p. 207.]
Since, however, archeological investigation has failed to reveal any
connection between the Fort Ancient Aspect and the later historic
Indian cultures which occupied the region, it generally is concluded
that the former disappeared before 1700, probably as a result of
the documented Iroquois invasion of c. 1680.
The Fort Ancient Aspect then represents a Middle Mississippi offshoot which
merged culturally with a basic Woodland group already tinged with Mississippian
traits. This process was interrupted by the pressure of the Iroquois from the
northeast, and the southeastern Fort Ancient sites were modified as a result of
the pressure of the Europeans on the Indian tribes of the Piedmont and mountain
area of West Virginia and Virginia. The Madisonville Focus lasted until the
period between 1670 and 1690, when its cultural unity was destroyed by the
Iroquois and by the attraction of the Indians in the area to trading centers
such as those of the IIlinois Valley, The Middle Atlantic Area, and the Southeast.
..- As already stated, it is doubtful that any specific historic tribe or tribes can be
associated with the Fort Ancient culture. It is almost certain that it is not
Iroquoian, and there is little or no archaeological or historical evidence that it is a
Siouan relic. This seems to leave only one linguistic stock of sufficient promi-
nence in the area which cannot be eliminated, namely, the Algonquian. [Griffin,
1943, p. 308.]
Among the various Algonquian tribes the Shawnee have what may
be considered the best claim to having resided in at least part of the
Fort Ancient territory during the early historic (Griffin, 1943, pp.
120-121, table x1v; Hanna, 1911, vol. 1, pp. 119-126; Mayer-Oakes,
1955, pp. 170-171; Witthoft and Hunter, 1955).
224 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
COMPONENTS OF THE FORT ANCIENT ASPECT, MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI
PHASE, MISSISSIPPI PATTERN
Components Focus Reference
1. Campbell Island______-- Madisonville: teu 22 . 21) = Griffin, 19438.
Dr aLCE label AMG cre ae ee ee ee (6 Ka ne eet pte a ey Neve RA fo)
SPEin estan stcether ibe rar rye ee dors. SA eee = Do
Ai? DeapliSrte seats nae 4 epee ret Oe teria SFr en ee Do
Hee DDG aw Oe ee aoe we GOQe se fee ee eee Do
Onl ED eae Oe a eS eee GO ra ore eee ae oe Do
Ul 2eOhonlSarth: srt ellen rs Got. Vs Prise sl . a igret Do
Se TasOh og oko e wees Sore a GOLe 2 ew ieee ee Do
OF Madisonvilles2oe2 2 elses | oe GOeoe a ae oe eee Do
iO; GDaepinis Pa nse esse eee cee dowel els 16 rans Do
tie Mohmisshield2s 52 see esos CO (cas apie eee ee ee ae aE, Do
{2c Sand hidgel—- == So ee loo es 10 eu gnc ap Seal heh Do.
(SiwHoxehanm te. ase Pee al: ae doxeart seals ‘ayred Sh. Do.
4 Clay Weninmdis oe ged 3 C0 eNO ey ea eae ee, Do.
TS sited Ci Pag ee = geen Dg aa Ea Qe ne oe eee Do.
GaP ESIC KN GT tes ye ea | Se (6 (oes Reet gs ae gL Do
lc ee IM eons pene ee ee Am @eTsOn Es see has ee ee Do
ISIMStecle* Dam fe Leos seek OLee2 TS. Sule ees Do.
OM Ma ylor seis Sh Se hee Ree peaches (OLA EY 24289 oy Pa aoe Do.
ZO SAAn Gerson sa sad Joe eS alee (Olt ee ey Do
DilesvoripAn cient]. ase aoe ‘okay int ent) Sat Do
Dee ROVES se ee ee an ee (6 (0 nies pide eeepc rt ppee ape a Do
23" Stokesee oh Lees A 1 PO is Gomes: 1S ESA Ms ea Do
DA SOUT os ee ee ek Baume 222 2 oO ae Sen Do
2 ue Garunens. © =u a ee ff (oan epee, Na Na peal Sie Do
26es bala witnesses ots ORE Sree Golrs 2 O2_ MEMO AO Do
OA fee gl ak yt aS a a es we dosiea4 bene 24s Do
2S Shen b ee eee oe ee Se J Rabe as ot ee See ee he Do
29 Hullertom Pield= 22222 -2_ |p Ss dosti’ DEMING “fore Do
30) HerOctOnvill es = eee eee GO =e Ff es ee Do.
SUR MO LOVET tee oS Clavier Ja—0 foe oes See Griffin, 19438;
Mayer-Oakes,
1955.
a2. bultalo, (Wells) = eee. alee (6 (0 YSeBe ie Rate Sak oh nah WE hee ol Do.
Joe Orchard (barsons)= es. e ssa dose 2 Ne Fea ae Mairs, 1950;
Mayer-Oakes,
1955.
ae CUEEG = |S £5 tee ek oe eles Ces ace ps Dn Griffin, 1948.
Eee SO VANS UO Wyte ee GO ee ee eee Do.
*Denotes sites containing historic materials.
East of the Fort Ancient Aspect, on the headwaters of the Ohio,
Potomac, and western Susquehanna Rivers, lie two closely related
basically Woodland Aspects displaying numerous influences of Mis-
sissippian character, seemingly derived from the Feurt and Clover
Foci of the Fort Ancient culture. Such influences became so strong
in the later phases of the Monongahela Focus that the latter has
sometimes been considered a part of the Mississippi Pattern. Histori-
cally, however, the Monongahela roots seem to be Woodland, the
Mississippi traits coming in as foreign elements from the west, and
being of particular importance in the westernmost focus—the Monon-
sop T ee APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 225
Map 10.—Components of the Fort Ancient Aspect.
gahela. The Mississippian influences are attenuated most in the
Shenk’s Ferry Aspect, but still give this culture a distinctive cast
(Butler, 1939; Evans, 1955; Griffin, 1952; Manson, MacCord, and
Griffin, 1944, p. 416; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 98-112, 155-162, 220-
224; Witthoft, 1954; 1955; Witthoft and Farver, 1952).
The Monongahela Aspect is distributed over a large territory which
includes eastern Ohio, northern West Virginia, and the western parts
of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. The Monongahela Focus
is largely west of the Appalachian Divide and the Luray Focus en-
tirely east of the Divide (see map 11). Both foci are characterized by
distinctive pottery vessels and pipe types, by certain kinds of beads,
pendants, and projectile points, and the occurrence of heavily fortified
hilltop villages displaying round stockades and houses, and central
plazas. From his study of the Monongahela Focus Mayer-Oakes
concluded that
The abundance and relative richness of Monongahela sites imply that these
peoples were probably the most numerous single group of Indians ever to live
in the Upper Ohio Valley. The general excellence of pottery and other artifacts,
control over environment and creation of leisure time indicate that the Monon-
gahela villagers had reached a high level of adjustment to their natural surround-
ings. . . . Warfare and military activities were an important aspect of life in
Monongahela times. The very structure of the village indicates that ideas of
protection were prevalent. Also many village situations, on hilltops and other
296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
commanding positions, obviously served defensive purposes. . . . While these
people settled primarily in the area drained by the lower and middle Monongahela
River, some settlements are known from the Ohio Valley proper and outlying
villages occur in the Shenango and upper Allegheny valleys. Some of the Whittle-
sey focus sites are characterized by minor amounts of Monongahela pottery.
‘‘Monongahela Cordmarked [pottery]’’ is also found on sites in the Shenandoah
and Potomac valleys, most often as trade material but perhaps as components
in several instances. [Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 12, 222.]
This statement possibly might apply to the Luray Focus also, which
unfortunately is still relatively unknown (Manson, MacCord, and
Griffin, 1944, pp. 400-401; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, pp. 158-162; Schmitt,
1952, pp. 62-64).
As is the case with the Fort Ancient culture, numerous clues indicate
Monongahela contacts with neighboring groups. Iroquois trade pot-
tery frequently has been found in Monongahela sites; conversely,
Monongahela pottery is known from Whittlesey sites, and from
historic sites on the lower Susquehanna and Potomac which have
been dated at c. 1600. European trade goods also have been found
in Monongahela components which, curiously enough, are concen-
trated in the middle Monongahela drainage near the headwaters
of the Potomac. Historic trade goods are never abundant, however,
partly because the Monongahela people do not seem to have prac-
ticed the custom of burying grave goods with their dead, and partly
because the Monongahela culture and peoples disappeared before
European penetration became intensive. The territory of the Monon-
gahela Aspect seems to have remained essentially unoccupied until
about 1700, at which time Indian groups from the east began a
movement into it. A number of students have identified the Iroquois
as the cause of the Monongahela disappearance (Mayer-Oakes,
1955, pp. 9-12, 228; Schmitt, 1952, pp. 67-69).
Somewhat more data is available concerning the fate of the Shenk’s
Ferry Aspect. Characterized by ‘“‘widely scattered tiny hamlets,’
and by distinctive pottery types, the two foci of the Shenk’s Ferry
Aspect occupied the eastern side of the Susquehanna drainage be-
tween Harrisburg and the Pennsylvania-Maryland State line, the
middle course of the Susquehanna between Harrisburg and Wilkes-
Barre, and the west branch of the Susquehanna to Renova, and were
overrun some time between 1560 and 1590 by the Tioga Focus from
the Upper Susquehanna. This process seems to have involved,
among other things, an absorption of Shenk’s Ferry peoples into
the Tioga culture. The reasons for this conclusion have been pre-
sented by Witthoft:
We have several reasons for believing that the Shenk’s Ferry people survived
into the Historic period. The best evidence comes from the Shultz Site of Wash-
ingtonboro, the earliest Susquehannock [Tioga] site on the lower Susquehanna,
Antropy;2P: APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 227
. . . On this site the whole Shenk’s Ferry complex, including the pottery types
described here, along with a majority of another type of Shenk’s Ferry pottery
partially acculturated to Susquehannock style, is intermixed with early
colonial Susquehannock materials in a large number of the pits and graves, and
apparently represents the product of a large number of captives. At the next
Susquehannock Site, the Washingtonboro Site, a very few such Shenk’s Ferry
sherds have been excavated from Susquehannock middens of the mid-seven-
teenth century [now redated to 1600-1620]. [Witthoft and Farver, 1952, p. 5.]
Thus, the Shenk’s Ferry history, like that of the Monongahela and
Fort Ancient Aspect, affords ample proof of the nonstatic nature of
Indian interrelations in the Early Historic (Witthoft, 1951, p. 318;
1954, pp. 26-27; 1955).
The remaining archeological complex represented within the north-
western Pennsylvania and Ohio area is the so-called Iroquois Aspect;
a distinctive cultural unit seemingly indigenous to the interior low
plateau and central lowland provinces flanking the northernmost
ranges and plateaus of the Appalachian system, expanding into the
Allegheny sector of the Appalachian Plateau and into the ridge and
valley provinces of Pennsylvania only during the historic period.
The westernmost focus of the Iroquois Aspect was the Whittlesey,
the fortified towns of which extended along the Ohio shore of Lake
Erie, along the Maumee River into Indiana (e.g. ,the Secrest-Reasoner
component of Blackford County, Ind., not shown on the accompany-
ing map), and possibly into southeastern Michigan. While its cul-
tural affiliations largely point east to the Ripley Focus and to the
Iroquois Aspect generally, the focus also shows strong influences
from the Monongahela Aspect and from the Mississippian cultures,
particularly Fort Ancient. Like these other archeological complexes,
the Whittlesey Focus disappeared during the Early Historic—only
one component, Fairport, yielding any European trade goods. As
a result of this early demise, few suggestions exist as to the identity
of the culture’s bearers. Most archeologists have avoided the ques-
tion altogether; others, lacking any other candidates, have brought
forth the Erie (Black, 1935; Griffin, 1944, p. 368; Mayer-Oakes,
1955, p. 222; Morgan, 1952, pp. 96-97).
The Ripley Focus, with components lying along the southern shore
of Lake Erie between Buffalo and the Ohio border, is closely related
to the Lawson and Factory Hollow Foci farther to the east, and less
so to the Whittlesey. The major sites, Ripley and 28th Street,
are large, rich villages yielding European trade goods of an early
date. Nolater sites have been found, leading to the general conclusion
that this culture also disappeared before or about 1650. The Ripley
Focus often has been identified as the remains of the Erie tribe (or
nation), but its major characteristics, a small number of large villages
situated very close to Lake Erie, are such that this identification may
298 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
COMPONENTS OF THE MONONGAHELA AND SHENK’S FERRY ASPECTS,
APPALACHIAN PHASE, WOODLAND PATTERN
Components Focus Reference
ToMobatess seo e ee ek Monongahela. ____ Mayer-Oakes, 1955.
Ds OVINE Lyf 2 Re SA Faas fo plas Bake cleat ee Oo.
3: OO Mel 6. Herta Baer Shree s dotesl* Bun7-s Do
ASS ORB VEO =e ee ee Sa ie es (och A es ae Do
Stishippmenerts) !. 00) 19) 4608 Goat 25h ee Do
Gi. (SCARCIN A 5 08 A ee re aay ies em COS ieee oes Do
CEVA LS OM Ei = Sere eee Sok ea rset a (6 (oy ek ee Poe S Do
S46 ski 2B bs RE Tie FF pg STE Ot Gos Ses Os Do
OF PA ORK G ea eo ae BoP Al tee dos seen es Do
LOMA GBT 2h Sa re ee NE Goses eh eee Do
IEE AGL Olt) Lis LOVE 3S Mahe TE Gos AR) Do
Lj A OnOh (eased eet i el ee GO aan eS Do
SAG Ohmien see. Sa TL ae ro koe ee Riel aa Do.
TAS A GUM 7c Esk Oe. SIPS eat dot Peels evra Do.
15. McKee Rock Mound____|__-_-_- Ose te — Bee Do.
Gib unclasee. Soe Comin see Sl hoe Gomes see Do.
Dae NG Well sebet eet oP AT enh Gouse uel. 9 Do.
TS. Philips. = fon os Poe en ee (oo ene ee oer Do.
HORNS peerss eee haw. 1 eee lea (0 (oy Ae OR RE Do.
202.Buekner sea Sty See So ee dose: terse Do.
DECKER | a Se, fps Dae eel eee (o (oj eens © ee Do.
22 Wile sesh OE RUA TNC (Ae. go dosse ie ae Do.
eeu Our besser WARIS 299) 5_ | eee Gow co. Do.
2A, PASIAN ECTS 5-2 ea.) 4 6) oe Gort nips tpaes: Do.
De AORGGM. ~> pultalo Gaps Jeo. 2. So. |oee at co ge oy ae Do.
AA @lovercreeic= 4246. Sane CL One hd ee Do.
45. Waynesville sites_.._____|_____ AO sepa tie ee Witthoft, 1955.
AGsa Welsh bynes seo ee nee Se (3 (Oye Oe Do.
AT PUBVeret bees > ee bs TE BUT e?, Gost antes» SeRbs Do.
AS oy UMOTNY ® oe ke ee Shenk’s Ferry __-__- Witthoft and Farver, 1952.
AQPAMillert22 - seers iy oe Wie tae Oo eae BN Do.
SO#Shen ket 2 2 sk a aa ae doseewite Dee Do.
OBR ES TenmMe nan asses ee eee | eee clone eens Sete Do.
o2esbetermices pues 22 1 ola ee dolar ate Do.
Hae watara (orb) olen ee eee Coe UE as Do.
54. Indiantown Gap*_______]____- (Cho ieee ee OP er Do.
55. Muncy Creek*__________ SUCEN Malis ee eee ee Witthoft, 1954.
HEM Mbe WATT. sa SbUr ¥ EST ee Gore se. DOI Do.
*Denotes sites containing historic material.
AnropT 2P- APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 229
Mar 11.—Components of the Monongahela (black) and Shenk’s Ferry (white) Aspects,
Appalachian Phase, Woodland Pattern.
not survive critical reading of the historical sources. Witthoft (1951,
p. 320) has expressed some doubts on this point (Carpenter, Pfirman,
and Schoff, 1949, p. 6; MacNeish, 1952 a, p. 6; 1952 b, pp. 22-24:
Parker, 1907; 1922, pp. 271-276).
North and east of the Ripley Focus we find the Lawson and Fac-
tory Hollow Foci. The former includes several sites in the Buffalo
area east of Niagara, and others in southern Ontario. Only the
Buffum Street site has yielded historic trade goods, yet the entire
focus is attributed, with some justification, to the Neutrals, who
are known from historical sources to have resided in this same area,
to have suffered several defeats at the hands of the New York Iro-
quois between 1648 and 1651, and to have abandoned their country
shortly thereafter (Kidd, 1952, pp. 74-75; MacNeish, 1952 a, p. 54;
1952 b, pp. 10-11; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 319-320).
The Factory Hollow Focus represents the remains of the early
historic Seneca. Not only are most of the sites historic but several
have been identified with reasonable certainty with historically
known villages. These include Rochester Junction (Totiakton, also
known as Sonnontuan), Kirkwood (Gannounata), Boughton Hill
(Ganagaro), and Beal (Gandougarae), all of which were destroyed by
Denonville in 1687. The ‘direct historical method” is applicable
230 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
here. Research in this direction by Wray and Schoff (1953) has
defined those archeological traits (imported and native) distinctive of
Seneca culture at various times during the Early Historic, has eluci-
dated the changes brought about in Seneca culture by European
influences, and has indicated the sequence in which the various
villages were occupied between 1550 and 1687. The archeological
materials also emphasize the restricted distribution of these early
historic villages which lie largely within a narrow ecological zone
formed by the merger of the interior low plateau with the lowland
bordering Lake Ontario, bounded on the east by Lake Canandaigua
and on the west by the Genesee. The archeological evidence on
hand at present does not indicate any extensive Seneca movement
away from this area, other ‘Seneca’ sites being known only from the
Genesee and the Upper Allegheny (mostly undescribed and unpub-
lished), and possibly on the Susquehanna. All these are historic,
however, and some are historically documented Late Colonial (Hough-
ton, 1912, pp. 363-410; MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 53-54; 1952 b, pp.
38-39; Mayer, 1943; Mayer-Oakes, 1955, p. 72; Parker, 1919; Ritchie,
1954; Steward, 1954; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 318-319; 1955; Wray, 1954;
1955; Wray and Schoff, 1953).
The remaining foci of the Iroquois Aspect to be found in New York
are not directly pertinent to the purposes of this study, and only a
few comments need to be made. The Madison Focus furnishes us
with a warning against the uncritical correlation of archeological
foci with tribes, components showing striking similarities having been
correlated with historical villages assigned to the Onondaga, Oneida,
and St. Lawrence Iroquois (Kwedech) tribes. This fact is also of
interest in light of the known linguistic affiliations and warns us
against making any rash assumptions concerning the carriers of
archeological cultures (MacNeish, 1952 a, pp. 52-53; 1952 b, pp.
56-57, 66, 84; Witthoft, 1951, pp. 316-317).
As has been intimated already, the Tioga Focus originally seems to
have occupied the Upper Susquehanna drainage and to have migrated
from there to the Lower Susquehanna, blotting out the Shenk’s
Ferry culture in the process. This conclusion is based upon studies
of the datable European trade goods found in the sites and upon
cross-correlation with well-known Seneca sites, and may be considered
as fairly well established. The Upper Susquehanna sites, such as
Homets Ferry, South Towanda (Sick), and Cass, are equivalent to
the earliest historical Seneca sites, and are datable at c. 1550. The
Quiggle site on the west branch of the Susquehanna is slightly later,
and apparently represents the initial Tioga thrust into the lower
valley. After this time both the north and west branches seem to have
been abandoned, the archeological materials indicating a gap until
Anh} > APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 23]
the arrival of Delaware immigrants around 1720. The large Schultz
and Brandt sites, already mentioned in connection with the Shenk’s
Ferry remnants or “captives,” represent the final Tioga migration
downstream and are dated from 1560 to 1590. These are followed
by the Herriot site at Romney, W. Va., and by the large Washington-
boro site which dated from 1600 to 1620 and therefore was in existence
at the time of John Smith’s visit to the area in 1608. Later Tioga
sites have not been reported yet (Witthoft, 1955).
The contemporaneity of the Tioga Washingtonboro site and John
Smith’s visit permits a reasonable (although circumstantial) identi-
fication of the bearers of this culture. In his accounts and map
Smith places a tribe named the ‘Sasquesahanocks” (a ‘‘mightie
people”) upon the Susquehanna River below the mountains and in-
dicates several of their towns, one of which might be the Washing-
tonboro site. From other sources these “‘SSasquesahanocks” can be
correlated with all or part of the Iroquois-speaking group known to
the New York Iroquois, Huron, and French, as the Andasternonnon or
Andaste (whence the usual name for the archeological unit). During
the 17th century these people engaged in a long bitter war with the
New York Iroquois, and eventually were conquered around 1674.
It is interesting to note that while the Andaste language is related
closely to Mohawk, the material culture as revealed by archeology is
similar to that of the Factory Hollow, Lawson, and Ripley Foci
(Cadzow, 1936, pp. 9-38; Hanna, 1911, vol. 1, pp. 26-87; Skinner,
1921, pp. 57-67; Witthoft, 1955).
The historical evidence relative to the location of the Erie-Black
Minqua-Massawomeck is scanty and circumstantial, but still suffi-
cient for us to correlate this tribal confederation with an archeological
complex. From the material on hand it is evident that the Black
Minqua were west of the Susquehanna drainage area which, in 1670,
“was occupied by the Susquehannock (see maps 6 and 8). The state-
ments made by John Smith and others make it clear that the Monacan
and Manahoac occupied the Virginia Piedmont, and that the Massa-
womeck were to the west in the mountains. The French sources
also are consistent in placing the Erie in the upper Ohio River area.
Three statements are particularly important in this respect. The
first, dating from 1661 or 1662, derives from Lallemant.
Proceeding rather Westerly than Southerly, another band of Iroquois is going
four hundred leagues from here [the Iroquois country] in pursuit of a Nation
whose only offense consists in its not being Iroquois. It is called Ont°agannha,
signifying ‘‘the place where people cannot speak’’—because of the corrupt Al-
gonquin in use there.
Their villages are situated along a beautiful river which serves to carry the
people down the great Lake (for so they call the Sea)... . [Thwaites, ed., 1896-
1901, vol. 47, pp. 145-147.]
682—611—64——_19
232 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
COMPONENTS OF THE IROQUOIS ASPECT, NORTHEASTERN PHASE, WOOD-
LAND PATTERN
Components Focus Reference
1. National Tube Co______- Whittlesey________ Greenman, 1935 b; 1937.
PASM BAU Sees ple Ne Oe oe Ba Glee (6 Vo eS i Greenman, 1935 b.
oe eutblerbuall. flees 2 eee ae as Gols ie Fe Greenman, 1937.
Ae OUCH Park Sea Ee GOs IEe 4s ee Do.
BPI POLGT seer 8 Smeets aS ee (i Pe Rai ae a he ha Morgan and Ellis, 1943.
GseReever: euler dole Ghges Greenman, 1935 a.
WapBOLCe Orb eet hae lees Xe ae Greenman, 1935 b.
Se POUlOreGG hs. sae fe 787s pley so eee oe Carpenter, Pfirman, and
Schoff, 1949.
OS OELOY fg At he toh ele 5) ee ee Ser Parker, 1907.
Os Gooayeare we ..s joe eke Soe One eons MacNeish, 1952 a, b.
Le). Southwold: ti/Vit Su}. Ihanvsonis 2. 600 ar Do.
a2 7 lopawsan set Fe tt he tet be Oe ae ee Wintemberg, 1939.
SAME OUT GSH ees. s eee kOe ery ee Co (ape OM Dat aay MacNeish, 1952 b.
US Uren 22208 Le Ee Peet dob hrR iOS = Wintemberg, 1928.
$5. Middleport- << 225242 2cfowve Mine a fe 04, 4 Wintemberg, 1948.
ROM ARCIOIUca eee eee ee Se (6 (Aen od aaa MacNeish, 1952 a, b; Witt-
hoft, 1951.
7; sini treet fH. te Be Qos. 8-2 22 ae MacNeish, 1952 b.
18. Boseley Mills*__________ Factory Hollow___| Houghton, 1912; Wray and
Schoff, 1953.
AS og eo en Se ee Dee DO FE gs re ses Wray and Schoff, 1953.
207 souteh Hollows: = 2. 2. |222.2 CO see ae Houghton, 1912; Wray
and Schoff, 1953.
OW TW OO GF sh Fo Bd ce ie ers a8 (hc hae Lae eee Do.
Ben PAGANS Ae Sh 6 Soe eet Goeceee ste Do.
25 AiCameron s+ Oi ese es|L owe Gots Fe Wray and Schoff, 1953.
POI Na eee ee a ne ae 2 (ee ao. Houghton, 1912; Wray and
Schoff, 1953.
oA 98 a ie on ware i a Goss UG Ee Do.
20.p Powel HouUse* } ._ 2 t42..-|f 224 AG a a Fe, Do
Pf Adel BS 0 See oT Se ER aR Re as) Gotan a Do
28. Rochester Junction*_____|_____ dole) SUITE YS: Do
20/5 PVISIER OM Soe oe poe yh Se ee Alice Osa Pe dt 4s a8 Do.
SU: Hactory Hollow *t- 282 |=. = 5 GOS aaa eames ee 1912; Parker,
1919.
SV AVAUR DAG lo. pote a. ooo jp lade (0 (0 oe Sane Houghton, 1912; Wray and
Schoff, 1953.
S2vConmes, A hs FiO eb CoE eaes ee dosl Shean Wray and Schoff, 1953.
33. Boughton Hill Fort*_.___)_._-- (6 Ko eee 5 Ore yee Houghton, 1912; Wray
and Schoff, 1953.
of Boughton EMF 2) it 9 ui Gh Es Le BE Do.
SO DUN COR ape ees oe el 1 ee 2a ae Do.
OP SEO ae hey) een ee ey CKO baat em at Do.
OTT MeLOneN Fok Ley OLE OTSA NE Gora Shy. MASE Houghton, 1912.
BISA Pe liters) (2: ee ena me (EPs (Clee Aen eee Do.
DUS svbarsne seas Sts See ere ee dpstmee coats Houghton, 1912; Wray
and Schoff, 1953.
AG ROK Oe 2 on es es Py Se Te ee -: (oes ea Do.
oe Onaghee a. 2S Se eee 38 CLOW ernea Suen Parker, 1922.
foe Weeleher> Siete ig. ea Genoa Fort ___-__ MacNeish, 1952 b.
43! (Richmond ‘Malls. 22 8 Senn Galil deere dt Do.
AA Woodley 2.500 eo We Op} SoOe Jay ees Do.
45>) Miver s.Statiom.. —2- Soest i (0 een pat Sais Ds Do.
AG Senos IPOrG oe 2 8 le i) ee Do.
47. Pompey Center*________ Madisone: 5-9 oLe Wintemberg, 1936; Mac-
Neish, 1952 a, b.
See footnote at end of table.
Ano yo; » APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 233
COMPONENTS OF THE IROQUOIS ASPECT, NORTHEASTERN PHASE, WOOD-
LAND PATTERN—Continued
Components Focus Reference
AS? ‘Thurston tas. ae Madison:) 225... = MacNeish, 1952 b.
AQ’ Diable* yt thas 0 ele eS (coy ae ee Do.
OL Iikrwaras\ ile ee Gore: sesh es Do.
Bile MENG Geshe Le he Ree BI OPA eS ene ee ee! Lucy, 1950.
029 Murray). 24 2 |B Coe =e ARs = Murray, 1921.
53) Chemung Bridge*_.__2_ _|2_=.- don tts £854 Do.
549 Queen’ Eisther’s’_2"-2 25-3) 2 2228 GO eee Do.
poe Oldusheshequina sass 5a = GOm See ae ae Do.
569 Nouth Lowanda t= 22. sas ovens Sahees Witthoft, 1955.
SiR ase ee awe ale: 5 eee doers. wae Do.
58s Homet’s Perry *. <2 2 22.Y Pes Goel teres bel ne Do.
HOM @inicgles Le. 402 5s 58 eas Gow. fe sth 3 Lucy, 1950; Witthoft, 1954.
GOS. Brandt: /4e2 Steet oso! ieee ee CGEE tsa. tee Witthoft, 1955.
61. Washingtonboro*________|-_--- Gos fe he tae Caer 1936; Witthoft,
1 :
G2P Sehuigah a. 2220 8 Sess dot... See Do.
Gaaieneklert. _¢. 2 .g20 2 Ueber ree nies beh wey Do.
643 Shenk’s Ferry 222.2) 222 0 C0, Sa pe anne oa Do.
Gos -Herrnioth=- se oo ee lee nee oko’ ce rs Manson and MacCord, 1940;
1943; Witthoft, 1952;
1955.
*Denotes sites containing historic materials.
Map 12.—Components of the Iroquois Aspect, Northeastern Phase, Woodland Pattern.
234 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
“! DEWAWARE °°
Si he cw . aa .
plain
ANTICOKE
a ee
pe Shakori
Occaneechi —
Sissipaha
Cheéeraw
mygered Keyouwee
Map 13.—Probable distribution of Iroquoian tribes. Black circles indicate known locations
of Black Minqua or Erie groups.
The second statement, from Gallinee, tells us that in 1668 two
canoes of Senecas came to Montreal to trade, and told La Salle
. .. Of such marvels of the River Ohio, which they said they knew
perfectly. . . . They told him that this river had its source three days’ journey
from Sonnontouan, and that after a month’s travel he would reach the Honnia-
sontkeronons and the Chiouanons, and that after having passed these and a great
waterfall, which there was in the river, he would find the Outagame and the country
of the Iskousogos, and finally a country so abounding in deer and wild cattle that
they were thick as the woods, and such great numbers of people that there could
be no more. [Margry, 1876-86, p. 116.]
In the following year, 1669, when the Abbe Gallinee attempted to
obtain a prisoner from the Ohio from the Seneca to act as a guide for
A OPT WP APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 235
La Salle on his intended journey to that river, he was informed that the
Toaguenha [Ontoagnnhe] who lived there were an evil people who
would attack them in the night, and that, furthermore, he would
also run the risk of being attacked by the Antastoez [Andaste] (Maregry,
1876-86, pp. 137-138).
Since the Iroquois already had defeated the Erie in 1655 and 1656,
it is unlikely that these statements refer to them. This seems to
be confirmed by the names given which refer to Algonquian groups,
the name Ontoagonnha apparently being a general term referring to
both the Honniasontkeronon and Chiouanon. The statement of
1668 makes it clear, however, that the Honniasontkeronon and
Chiouanon lived on the Ohio above the falls at Louisville. The old
Erie territory therefore must have been farther east. Relating this
to the archeological picture, it would seem that the Honniasontk-
eronon and Chiouanon (Shawnee) occupied the territory of the Fort
Ancient Aspect, while the Erie-Black Minqua-Massawomeck in-
habited the area of the Monongahela Aspect. This interpretation
of the early tribal distribution of the middle Appalachian region is
depicted in map 13.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ApoupH, Henry F.
1938. ‘Archaeological fragments’? of the middle Susquehanna. The
Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 37-39.
AtyorpD, CLARENCE W., and Bripegoop, LEE.
1912. The first explorations of the trans-Allegheny region by the Virginians,
1650-1674. Cleveland.
ANONYMOUS.
1934. Old Iroquois fort found on dam site. The Pennsylvania Archaeol.,
vol. 4, No. 3, p. 22.
Anonymovus-Zunica Map.
1608. Map of Virginia, transmitted by Don Pedro de Zufiiga, Spanish
Minister at London to Philip III of Spain on Sept. 10, 1608. Ms.,
Simanca, Archivo General de Simancas, Estado, Legajo 2586, folio
148. [See Brown, 1890, vol. 1, pp. 183-188; Cumming, 1958,
No. 28; Lewis and Loomie, 1953, pp. 262-263 (Lewis and Loomie
attribute the map to Nathaniel Powell).]
ARBER, Epwarp, Epiror, see Smiru, JOHN, 1884.
AveGustTINE, Epear E.
1938 a. Recent discoveries in Somerset County. The Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 6-12.
1938 b. Indian fortifications in Somerset County. The Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 41-45.
1938 c. Somerset County excavations: The Powell sites. The Pennsyl-
vania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 60-63, 71.
1938 d. Important research on Peck and Martz Rock Shelter site in Somer-
set County. The Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 8, No. 4, pp.
83-88.
1942. Report of preliminary excavations at Logstown. Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 23-26.
236 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Baitey, Joun H.
1938. An analysis of Iroquoian ceramic types. Amer. Antiq., vol. 3, No. 4,
pp. 333-338.
BeaucHamp, Wiiuiam M.
1898. Earthenware of the New York aborigines. New York State Mus.
Bull. No. 22, Archeol. No. 3, pp. 71-146.
Brinrorp, Lewis R.
1959. Comments on the ‘‘Siouan Problem.’’ Ethnohistory, vol. 6, No. 1,
pp. 28-41.
BLAcK, GLENN A.
1935. Excavation of a Blackford County site. Indiana Hist. Bull., vol.
12, No. 5, pp. 148-157. [Secrest-Reasoner site.]
1954. An archaeological consideration of the Walam Olum. Jn Walam
Olum, or Red Score. The migration legend of the Lenni Lenape
or Delaware Indians ..., pp. 292-348. Indiana Hist. Soc.,
Indianapolis.
Brown, ALEXANDER.
1890. The genesis of the United States. A narrative of the movement in
England, 1605-1616, which resulted in the plantation of North
America by Englishmen... .2 vols. Boston.
Browne, Witiiam H., Epiror.
1883. Archives of Maryland. Volume 1; Proceedings and Acts of Mary-
land, January 1637/8-September 1664... . Maryland Hist. Soc.,
Baltimore.
Burk, Joun D.
1804-05. The history of Virginia from its first settlement to the present
day .... 3 vols. Petersburg, Virginia. [The same, con-
tinued by S. Jones and L. Hugh Girardin; vol. 4, published in
1816 in Petersburg.]
ButLer, Mary.
1939. Three archaeological sites in Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Hist. Comm. Bull. No. 753. Harrisburg.
Byrp, WILLIAM.
1728. The secret history of the Line. MS., Amer. Philos. Soc.
The history of the dividing line betwixt Virginia and North Carolina
run in the year of our Lord 1728. MS., New York, c. 1738.
[Published in 1841, 1866, 1901, and 1929.]
1929. William Byrd’s histories of the dividing line betwixt Virginia and
North Carolina, with introduction and notes by William K. Boyd.
North Carolina Hist. Comm., Raleigh.
Capzow, Donatp A.
1936. Archaeological studies of the Susquehannock Indians of Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Hist. Comm. Publ., vol. 3, Safe Harbor Rep. No. 2.
CARPENTER, Epmunp 8.
1942. Archaeological reconnaissance in the Upper Allegheny Valley.
Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 20-63. [Historic sites—
Cornplanter Seneca of 1845-1885; Buckaloons; Sugar Run; Kinzua;
Warren; W. Hickory; Oldtown; Indian Gap. Prehistoric.]
CARPENTER, EpMUND S., PrirMAN, K. R., and Scuorr, H. L.
1949. The 28th Street site. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 19, Nos. 1-2,
pp. 3-16. [Erie site of 1630-45 in Erie, Pa.]
Anthrop. Pap.
No wo] » APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 237
Cross, DororHy.
1941. Archaeology of New Jersey .... Prepared with the assistance of
Work Projects Administration, official project Nos. 165-22-8084,
62-22-6406, and 665-22-3369. Archaeol. Soc. New Jersey and
New Jersey State Mus. Trenton.
Davipson, DANIEL 8.
1929. Lock Haven expedition . . . along the west branch of the Susque-
hanna. Univ. Pennsylvania, Univ. Mus., Mus. Jour., vol. 20,
Nos. 3-4, pp. 307-318. [The Quiggle site, Pine Station, Clinton Co.
Pa., is Andaste of late Prehistoric.]
Encperc, Rospert M.
1931. Algonkian sites of Westmoreland and Fayette Counties, Pennsyl-
vania. West. Pennsylvania Hist. Mag., vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 143-
184. Pittsburgh. [Monongahela Aspect.]
EVANS, CLIFFORD.
1955. A ceramic study of Virginia archeology. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull.
160.
Evans, LEwis.
1755. A general map of the Middle British Colonies in America... . Sold
by R. Dodsey, Pall-Mall, London, and by the author in Philadel-
phia.
1939. Lewis Evans [and his works], by Lawrence Henry Gipson. Hist.
Soc. Pennsylvania. Philadelphia.
FENSTERMAKER, GERALD B.
1937. Iroquois animal gods or hunting charms. The Pennsylvania Archae-
ol., vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 76-78.
Frra@uson, Auice L.
1937 a. Burial area in Moyaone. Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 27,
No. 6, pp. 261-267.
1937 b. Moyaone and the Piscataway Indians. Washington, D.C.
FrrRNow, BertTHoLpd, and O’Catuacuan, E. B., Epirors.
1853-87. Documents relative to the colonial history of the State of New
York. 15 vols. Albany.
Fowxker, GERARD.
1894. Archeologic investigations in James and Potomac Valleys. Bur. Amer.
Ethnol. Bull. 23.
1902. Archaeological history of Ohio. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist. Soc.,
Columbus.
FRACHTENBURG, LEo J.
1913. Contributions to a Tutelo vocabulary. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol.
15, No. 3, pp. 477-479.
GatTrorD, LIONEL.
1657. Publick good without private interest. Or, A compendious remon-
strance of the present sad state and condition of the English colonie
in Virginea. H. Marsh, London. [Printed again in 1866, in
Vienna, by F. Koke for La Librairie Tross 4 Paris.]
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, UpPerR House.
1883. Action on ‘‘Act for Assistance to the Susquehannock’’; passed May
2, 1661. In Browne, 1883, pp. 400-407.
Gipson, LAwRENCE H. See Evans, Lewis, 1939.
938 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
GRASSMAN, THOMAS.
1952. The question of the locations of Mohawk Indian village sites existing
during the Historic Period. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 22,
Nos. 3-4, pp. 98-111.
GREENMAN, Emerson F.
1935 a. Excavation of the Reeve Village site, Lake County, Ohio. Ohio
State Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 2-64.
1935 b. Seven prehistoric sites in northern Ohio. Ohio State Archaeol.
and Hist. Quart., vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 220-237.
1937. Two prehistoric villages near Cleveland, Ohio. Ohio State Ar-
chaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 305-366.
1939. Cultural relationships of archaeological sites in the Upper Great
Lakes Region. Papers, Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Lett.,
vol. 24, Part 4, pp. 1-10.
1951. Old Birth Island Cemetery and the early historic trade route. Univ.
Michigan Mus. Anthrop. Occ. Contr. No. 11.
GRIFFIN, JAMES B.
1943. The Fort Ancient Aspect. Its cultural and chronological position
in Mississippi Valley archaeology. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann.
Arbor.
1944. The Iroquois in American prehistory. Papers, Michigan Acad.
Sci., Arts, and Lett., vol. 29, pp. 357-374.
1945. An interpretation of Siouan archaeology in the piedmont of North
Carolina and Virginia. Amer. Antiq., vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 321-
330.
1952. The Late Prehistoric cultures of the Ohio Valley. Ohio State
Archaeol. and Hist. Quart., vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 186-195. [Whittle-
sey Focus, Fort Ancient, Monongahela.]
Hae, Horatio.
1883. The Tutelo tribe and language. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol.
21, No. 114, pp. 1-45.
Hanna, CHaruzs A.
1911. The wilderness trail; Or, The ventures and adventures of the Penn-
sylvania traders on the Allegheny Path.... New York.
HARPER, J. RUSSELL.
1952. The Webb site, a stage in early Iroquoian development. Penn-
sylvania Archaeol., vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 49-64.
HAZARD, SAMUEL, ET AL.
1852-1935. Pennsylvania archives. Series 1, Philadelphia; series 2-8,
Harrisburg.
Henine, Witt1am W., Epiror.
1809-23. Statutes at large; being a collection of all the laws of Virginia,
from the first session of the legislature, in the year 1619 ....
13 vols. Richmond. [2d edition, 1823, New York, Philadelphia,
and Richmond; vols. 1—5 only.]
HENRETTA, JAMES FE.
1929. Kane and the Upper Allegheny. Philadelphia.
HERRMAN, AUGUSTIN.
1673. Virginia and Maryland as it is planted and inhabited this present
year 1670 surveyed and exactly drawn by the only labour &
endeavour of Augustin Herrman Bohemiensis. John Seller,
Hydrographer to the King at his shop in exchangeally in Cornhill.
London.
Po] 2D APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 239
Heyes, Grores, and Prrpmr, Grorce H.
1915. Exploration of a Munsee cemetery near Montague, New Jersey.
Contr. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Found., vol. 4, No. 3. [Bell-
Philhower site.]
Hopes, FREDERICK W., Epiror.
1907, 1910. Handbook of American Indians north of Mexico. Bur. Amer.
Ethnol. Bull. 30, pts. 1 and 2.
Hotm, THomas CAMPANIUS.
1834. A short description of the Province of New Sweden.... Trans-
lated from the Swedish . . . with notes by Peter S. Du Ponceau.
Pennsylvania Hist. Soc. Mem., vol. 3, pp. 1-166.
HovucGuton, FREDERICK.
1912. The Seneca Nation from 1655 to 1687. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat.
Sci., vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 363-464.
JEFFERSON, THOMAS.
1800. Jefferson’s notes on the State of Virginia. . . . W. Pechin, Baltimore.
1954. Notes on the State of Virginia; edited with an introduction and notes
by William Peden. Inst. Early Amer. Hist. and Cult., Williams-
burg, Virginia. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
See also PADOVER, SAUL K.
Jesuit Revations. See THwaiTES, REUBEN GOLD.
JOHNSON, AMANDUS.
1930. The instructions for Johan Printz, Governor of New Sweden, “the
first constitution or supreme law of the States of Pennsylvania
and Delaware.’’ The Swedish Colonial Soc., Philadelphia.
See also LINDESTROM, PETER.
KAHLER, CLARKE B.
1938. Indian exploration work near Munsee, Pa., 1936 and 1937. Now and
Then, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 69-72. [Munsee Creek site at mouth of
Muncy Creek, of Shenk’s Ferry Aspect, c. 1620.]
Kipp, KENNETH E.
1952. Sixty years of Ontario archeology. In ‘Archeology of Eastern
United States,” ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 71-82. Univ. Chicago
Press, Chicago.
LEDERER, JOHN.
1672 a. The discoveries of John Lederer, in three several marches from
Virginia, to the west of Carolina, and other parts of the continent:
Begun in March 1669, and ended in September 1670. Together
with a general map of the whole territory which he traversed.
Collected and translated out of Latine from his discourse and
writings, by Sir William Talbot Baronet. London. [Reprinted
by 8. C. Walker, Evans and Cogswell Co., Charleston, S.C., 1891;
G. P. Humphrey, Rochester, N.Y., 1902; and in Alvord and
Bidgood, 1912, pp. 181-171.]
1672 b. A map of the whole territory traversed by John Lederer in his three
marches. London. Jn Lederer, 1672 a, opp. p. 1; Cumming,
1958, No. 68.
1958. The discoveries of John Lederer with unpublished letters by and about
Lederer to Governor John Winthrop, Jr. Ed. by William P.
Cumming. Univ. Virginia Press, Charlottesville.
LEsLIE, VERNON,
1951. A tentative catalogue of Minsi material culture. Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 21, Nos. 1-2, pp. 9-20.
YAO BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Lewis, Cuirrorp M., and Loomis, ALBERT J.
1953. The Spanish Jesuit Mission in Virginia, 1570-1572. Virginia Hist.
Soe. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
LINDEsTROM, PETER.
1925. Geographia Americae with an account of the Delaware Indians,
based on surveys and notes made in 1654-1656 by Peter Lindestrém.
Translated from the original manuscript with notes, introduction,
and an appendix of Indian geographical names with their meanings,
by Amandus Johnson. Swedish Colonial Soc., Philadelphia.
Lucy, CHar.es L.
1950. Notes on a small Andaste burial site and Andaste archaeology.
Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 20, Nos. 3-4, pp. 55-62.
MacCorp, Howarp A.
1952. The Susquehannock Indians in West Virginia, 1630-1677. West
Virginia Hist., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 239-246.
MacNEIsuH, Ricuarp 8.
1952 a. The archeology of the Northeastern United States. In “Archeology
of Eastern United States,’’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 46-58.
Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
1952 b. Iroquois pottery types: A technique for the study of Iroquois
prehistory. Nat. Mus. Canada Bull. No. 124, Anthrop. ser.
No. 31, pp. 1-166.
Marrs, O. L.
1950. A child burial site at site 46Ms61. West Virginia Archeol., No. 3,
pp. 1-4.
Manson, Cart, and MacCorp, Howarp A.
1940. An historic Iroquois site near Romney, West Virginia. West Vir-
ginia Hist., vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 290-293.
1943. Additional notes on the Herriot Farm site. West Virginia Hist.,
vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 201-211.
Manson, Cart; MacCorp, Howarp A.; and GrirrIn, JAMEs B.
1944. The culture of the Keyser Farm site. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci.,
Arts, and Lett., vol. 29, pp. 375-418.
Marery, PIERRE.
1876-86. Découvertes et éstablissements des Francais dans l’ouest et dans
le sud l’Amerique Septentrionale (1614-1754): Memoires et
documents originaux recueillis et publiés par Pierre Margry.
6 vols. Paris.
Mayer, JosepH R.
1943. Flintlocks of the Iroquois, 1620-1687. Rochester Mus. Arts and
Sci., Res. Rec., vol. 6.
MayErR-OakKEs, WILLIAM J.
1953. An archeological survey of the proposed Shanango River Reservoir
area in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Annals Carnegie Mus., vol. 33,
art. 3 (Anthrop. Ser. No. 1).
1954. The Scarem Site, Washington County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 45-62.
1955. Prehistory of the Upper Ohio Valley; an introductory archeological
study. Annals Carnegie Mus., vol. 34 (Anthrop. Ser. No. 2).
Miter, Car F.
1957. Revaluation of the eastern Siouan problem, with particular emphasis
on the Virginia branches—the Occaneechi, the Saponi, and the
Tutelo. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 164, Anthrop. Pap. No. 52.
ee APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 24]
Mitts, Witi1aM C.
1914. Archeological atlas of Ohio, showing the distribution of the various
classes of prehistoric remains in the State, with a map of the
principal Indian trails and towns. Ohio State Archeol. and Hist.
Soc., Columbus.
Mooney, JAMES.
1894. The Siouan tribes of the east. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 22.
MoorEHEAD, WARREN K.
1938. A report of the Susquehanna River Expedition. Andover Press,
Andover, Mass.
Morgan, RicHarpD G.
1952. Outline of cultures in the Ohio region. In ‘Archeology of Eastern
United States,”’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 83-98. Univ. Chicago
Press, Chicago.
Morean, RicHarp G., and Ennis, H. H.
1943. The Fairport Harbor Village site. Ohio State Archaeol. and Hist.
Quart., vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 3-64.
Morrison, A. J.
1921. The Virginia Indian trade to 1673. William and Mary Coll. Quart.
Hist. Mag., 2d ser., vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 217-236.
Murray, Louise W.
1921. Aboriginal sites in and near “Teaoga,”’ now Athens, Pennsylvania. I.
Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-214.
Nertt, Epwarp D.
1876. The founders of Maryland, as portrayed in manuscripts, provincial
records and early documents. Albany.
1886. Virginia Carolorum: the colony under the rule of Charles the First
and Second, 1625-1685, based upon manuscripts and documents
of the period. Albany
Norona, DELF.
1950. An Indian old field in Washington’s round bottom lands. West
Virginia Archeol., No. 3, pp. 9-10.
PapovER, Saut K.
1943. The complete Jefferson. Containing his major writings, published
or unpublished, except his letters. New York.
PARKER, ARTHUR C.
1907. Excavations in an Erie Indian village and burial site at Ripley,
Chautauqua County, N.Y. New York State Mus. Bull. No. 117
(Archeol. No. 14).
1919. A contact Seneca site situated at Factory Hollow, Ontario County,
N.Y. with a map by Alter H. Cassebeer and report of a field survey
by H. C. Follett. New York State Archeol. Assoc., Lewis H.
Morgan Chap., Res. and Trans., vol. 1, No. 2. Rochester.
1922. The archeological history of New York. New York State Mus.
Bull., Nos. 235-238.
PHILHOWER, CHARLES A.
1953. The historic Minisink site. I. Archaeol. Soc. New Jersey, Bull.
No. 7, pp. 1-9
242 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PRINTZ, JOHAN.
Relation Till datt Hoghloflige West Indesche Compagn. uthi
gambla Sverige, den 11 Junij, Anno 1644 uther Nya Swerige
afgangitt. MS., Royal Archives, Stockholm, 1644. [Jn Johnson,
1930, pp. 105-126, translated and collated.]
——— ‘Translatirte copey der Relation ahn die Hochlobliche West Indesche
Compagnie in alt Schweden, den 11 ten Junij Anno 1644 auss
New Schweden abganged. MS., Royal Archives, Stoekholm,
1644. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp. 105-126, translated and collated.]
Relation till datt Hoghlafflige West Indiske Compagn. Uthj gamble
Swerige, Den 20 Februarij 1647 Urthur Nya Swerige afganged.
MS., Royal Archives, Stockholm, 1647. [Jn Johnson, 1930, pp.
127-148, translated.]
Printz to Oxenstierna, April 26, 1653. MS., Royal Archives,
Oxenstierna samlingen, Stockholm, 1653. [Jn Johnson, 1930,
pp. 187-190, translated.]
1883. The report of Governor Johan Printz, of New Sweden, for 1647, and
the reply of Count Axel Ocenstjerna, Chancellor of Sweden.
Translated from the Swedish by Prof. Gregory B. Keen. The
Pennsylvania Mag. Hist. and Biog., vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 271-285.
Philadelphia
QuimBy, GEorGE I.
1952. The archeology of the Upper Great Lakes area. Jn “Archeology of
Eastern United States,” ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 90-107.
Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
RitcuHi£, WILLIAM A.
1944. The Pre-Iroquoian occupations of New York State. Rochester
Mus. Arts and Sci., Mem. No. 1.
1949. The Bell-Philhower site, Sussex County, New Jersey. Indiana
Hist. Soc., Prehist. Res. Ser., vol. 3, No. 2.
1951. A current synthesis of New York prehistory. Amer. Antiq., vol. 17,
No. 2, pp. 130-136
1954 a. Dutch Hollow, an early historic period Seneca site in Livingston
County, New York. Rochester Mus. Arts and Sci., Res. Ree.
No. 10.
1954 b. Dutch Hollow, an early historic period Seneca site in Livingston
County, New York. New York State Archeol. Assoc., Res. and
Trans., vol. 12, No. 1.
Scumitt, Kart.
1952. Archeological chronology of the Middle Atlantic States. Jn ‘Arche-
ology of Eastern United States,”’ ed. by James B. Griffin, pp. 59-70.
Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
Scuorr, Harry L.
1937 a. A report of the excavation of the ancient Indian burial mound near
Muncy, Lycoming County, Penna. Pennsylvania Archaeol.,
vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3-5.
1937 b. Excavation of the village area near the burial mound on the H. G.
Brock property, Muncy, Pa. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 7,
No. 1, pp. 6-7.
1937 c. Report on archaeological investigations carried on at the J. T.
Roberts property, Montoursville, Lycoming County, Pennsyl-
vania. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 7, No. 1, p. 8.
Anthrop) 2: APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 243
Simmonps, WILLIAM, and Ports, RicHarp, Eprrors.
1612. The Proceedings of the English Colonie in Virginia since their first
beginning from England in the yeare of our Lord 1606, till this
present 1612, with all their accidents that befell them on their
Iournies and Discoveries. Also the Salvages discourses, orations
and relations of the Bordering neighbours, and how they became
subject to the English. Oxford. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884,
pp. 85-174.]
SKINNER, ALANSON B.
1921. Notes on Iroquois archeology. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Found.,
Notes and Mono., Misc. No. 18.
SmitH, JOHN.
1608. A true relation of such occurrences and accidents of noate as hath
hapned in Virginia since the first planting of that collony. London.
1612 a. A map of Virginia. Discouered and discribed by Captayn John
Smith, 1606. Oxford. Jn Smith, 1884, facing p. 384.
1612 b. A map of Virginia. With a description of the countrey, the com-
modities, people, government and religion. Oxford.
1624. The Generall historie of Virginia, New England, and the Summer
Isles: .. .. London. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884, pp. 273-784.]
1884. Capt. John Smith of Willougy by Alford, Lincolnshire; President
of Virginia and Admiral of New England. Works. 1608-1631.
Ed. by Edward Arber. The English Scholar’s Library, No. 16.
Birmingham.
1910. Travels and works of Captain John Smith. Ed. by Edward Arber.
A new edition, with a biographical and critical introduction by
A. G. Brodley. 2 vols. Edinburgh.
SPELMAN, HEnrRy.
1872. Relation of Virginea, by Henry Spelman, 1609. Ed. by Henry
Stevens. London. [Reprinted in Smith, 1884, pp. ci-exiv.]
Spotswoop, ALEXANDER.
1882-85. The official letters of Alexander Spotswood Lieutenant Governor
of the Colony of Virginia, 1710-1722. Virginia Hist. Soc.
Coll., n.s., vols. 1-2. Richmond.
STEARNS, Ricuarp E.
1940. The Hughes site: An aboriginal village site on the Potomac River
in Montgomery County, Maryland. Nat. Hist. Soc. Maryland,
Proc. No. 6. Baltimore.
Stewart, ALEXANDER M.
1954. Historical evidences of Totiakton: The great western Seneca village.
Eastern States Archeol. Federation Bull., No. 13, pp. 6-7. Tren-
ton.
Stewart, T. Date.
1939. Excavating the Indian village of Patawomeke (Potomac). Explora-
tions and Field-Work of the Smithsonian Institution in 1938,
pp. 87-90.
1940. Further excavations at the Indian village site of Patawomeke (Po-
tomac). Explorations and Field-Work of the Smithsonian Insti-
tution in 1939, pp. 79-82.
244 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
STRACHEY, WILLIAM.
1849. The historie of travaile into Virginia Britannia; Expressing the
Cosmographie and Comodities of the Country, Together with
the Manners and Customes of the People. Gathered and Observed
as Well by Those Who Went First Thither as Collected by William
Strachey. MS., edited by R. H. Major, in the British Museum.
Hakluyt Soe. Publ. No. 6. London.
1953. The historie of travell into Virginia Britania (1612). Ed. by Louis
B. Wright and Virginia Freund, from the Princeton manuscript.
Hakluyt Soc. Publ. No. 103. London.
SruRTEVANT, WILL1AM C.
1958. Siouan languages in the east. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 60, No. 4,
pp. 738-743.
SwauGeEr, James L.
1950. Carnegie Museum and the archeology of the Upper Ohio River
Basin. West Virginia Archeol., No. 3, pp. 14-15.
TuwaltEs, REUBEN G., EpITor.
1896— The Jesuit Relations and allied documents. Travels and explora-
1901. tions of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610-1791. The
original French, Latin, and Italian texts, with English translation
and notes; illustrated by portraits, maps, facsimiles. 73 vols.
Cleveland.
VAN DER Donck, ADRIAEN.
1655. Beschryvinge van Nieuw Nederlandt. (Gelijck het tegenwoordigh
in Staet is) Begrijpende de Nature, Aert, gelegentheyten vruch-
baerheyt van het selve Landt. Evert Nieuwenhof Boeck—ver-
kooper. t’Aemsteldom.
1841. Description of the New Netherlands .... Translated from the
original Dutch by Hon. Jeremiah Johnson. New York Hist. Soc.
Coll., 2d ser., vol. 1, pp. 125-242.
VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY.
Laws of Virginia, 1642-1662. ‘‘Randolph”’ MS., Jefferson Collec-
tion, Library of Congress.
Dec. 1656/7th of Commonwealth. Compensations for losses suffered
during the late expedition against the Indians. Jn Virginia
Assembly et al., 1606-1692, pp. 207-208.
— March 1655/6th of Commonwealth. Act XV. March 10th. In
Virginia Assembly, 1642-1662, pp. 111-112 and Hening, 1819-1823,
vol. 1, pp. 402-403.
Dec. 1656-7th of Commonweatlth. [Hill vs. Commonwealth of
Virginia]. Jn Virginia Assembly et al., 1609-1692, p. 200 and
Hening, 1819-1823, vol. 1, pp. 422-423.
VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY ET AL.
Miscellaneous Records, 1606-1692. ‘Bland’ MS., 1606-1692,
Jefferson Collection, Library of Congress.
WESLAGER, CLINTON A.
1948. Monongahela woodland culture and the Shawnee. Pennsylvania
Archaeol., vol. 18, Nos. 1-2, pp. 19-22.
Wuirtst, Marion E.
1961. Iroquois culture history in the Niagara frontier area of New York
State. Univ. Michigan Mus. Anthrop., Anthrop. Pap. No. 16.
AntNrOP |, 7» APPALACHIAN REGION ANCIENT TRIBES—HOFFMAN 245
WINTEMBERG, WILLIAM J.
1928. Uren prehistoric village site, Oxford County, Ontario. Nat. Mus.
Canada, Bull. No. 51, Anthrop. Ser. No. 10.
1936. Roebuck prehistoric village site, Grenville County, Ontario. Nat.
Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 88, Anthrop. Ser. No. 19.
1939. Lawson prehistoric village site, Middlesex County, Ontario. Nat.
Mus. Canada, Bull. No. 94, Anthrop. Ser. No. 25.
1948. The Middleport prehistoric village site. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull.
No. 109, Anthrop. Ser. No. 27.
Wirttuort, JOHN.
1950. The history and present status of Pennsylvania archeology. Proc.
Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 301-307.
1951. Iroquois archeology at the mid-century. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc.,
vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 311-321.
1952. Comments on the cultural position of the Heriot Farm Site. West
Virginia Hist., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 249-253.
1954. Pottery from the Steward site, Clinton County. Pennsylvania Ar-
chaeol., vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 22-29. [Located opposite McElhattan,
on north bank of the west branch of the Susquehanna. Historic-
non-Andaste.]
WirrHort, JOHN, and Farver, S. S.
1952. Two Schenk’s Ferry sites in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. Penn-
sylvania Archaeol., vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3-32.
Wirrnort, JoHN, and Hunter, Wiuiiam A.
1955. The seventeenth-century origins of the Shawnee. Ethnohistory,
vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 42-57.
Wray, CHARLES F.
1954. Index traits of the historic Seneca—1550-1687. Eastern States
Archeol. Federation Bull., No. 138, p. 6.
Wray, CHARLES F., and Scuorr, Harry L.
1953. A preliminary report on the Seneca sequence in western New York,
1550-1687. Pennsylvania Archaeol., vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 53-63.
¥ aa itu yet cb sO al A ;
: to pa 1 aoe 2 Obie WF pr aS mats f Gf
A eth whe Naber bv a:
yj ith! 1 ab eM) gee val 7S
: é bite ey UG ie ait ad sli Ga aol
LAL BA Lah wt aa
i tine TY £ 9a
Hvar tir on
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 26
4 | |
a ¢ 3 ry
j ‘ eg ops ee
$ <> Hi A 3 oS CG: i
; re —— . — Hoe A a7 L
g —— ; 7
j rel LS es a 4 ~~
‘
reat |
3 4eE ' 7
oa = x 4
{4 \ Ms ee
a Rh. ps, : ,
Facsimile of section of Anonymous-Zuniga map of c. 1608.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 71
EL LIMON, AN EARLY TOMB SITE IN COCLE
PROVINCE, PANAMA
By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING
247
682—611—64——_20
_ 4
- es =
: ug f
\¥ Je : a
cso 9) ee es
=
FOITITITeAT “VAToenrnee |
qgofonta assimmA lo exerofl -_
1@{ scitatlatl .
{vo #nqed faciplononiind | a
31909 Vi ATIe EMOT YIWAR HA OMIT Ie
AMAVIAT ADVIVOAL.
SMLEAITS AGITAM on, .Y WAHTIAMW oi
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATE
(Follows page 254)
27. Incised slender vases.
TEXT FIGURE
i Pincised: sO DUlal POUSs cs oee 2 eee te eS ee es te 252
ROAT : ; -
seenetawen-hevessores seat ns are see nsk- sablog teladoly . a
ae | ee
= f
EL LIMON, AN EARLY TOMB SITE IN COCLE
PROVINCE, PANAMA
By Marruew W. and Marton Stiruine !
During the course of our archeological investigations in Panama
in the month of April 1951, Mr. Simeén Conte of Penonomé guided
us to an archeological site in the mountains back of Penonomé near
a place called El Limén.
The site consisted of a small burial ground with shoe-shaped shaft
tombs about 8 feet deep scattered for 100 yards along the top of a
high ridge. At the time of our arrival about nine tombs had been
opened; these apparently were all that the looters had been able to
find. Miguel Conte had acquired the contents of one of these tombs,
which he generously gave to us. The grave offerings consisted of
four tall slender vases and two globular pots with incised decorations.
The four vases are similar in size and form (pl. 27). Each rests
on a relatively small flat base tapering upward to a slender waist,
then flaring outward to a wide trumpet-shaped rim. About two-
thirds of the way upward each vase is encircled by a raised beveled
ridge, the upper portion of which on three of the specimens is further
embellished with small coffee-bean-like appliqued nodules. The
nature of the incised decorations can best be seen in the illustrations.
The natural color of the pottery is a pinkish buff, but a polished
brown slip had been applied, remnants of which remain on all four
examples. The tempering consists of crushed rock in which can be
seen some large fragments of clear quartz.
The two pots are of the same ware (fig. 17). They are subglobular
in form with round bottoms. The smaller pot has an outflaring rim,
and the other probably had a similar rim, but it has been entirely
broken off. The body of each pot is almost completely covered
with an incised herringbone design. The pattern on the smaller
pot is particularly interesting as it is produced by negative incising—
if such a term may be used. The incising was done with a broad
chisellike instrument, producing between the strokes narrow raised
ridges which form the design.
1 We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the Bureau of American Ethnology, for
the line drawings in this paper.
251
252 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
4
a
4
SF
ARE Ta
OO
Oo INCHES 8
a eS |
cM.
Ficure 17.—Incised globular pots.
It is possible that the tall ‘‘vases’? were stands for the round-
bottomed pots. This theory would sound more probable if it were
possible to determine that there were originally four instead of two
ae Th EL LIMON TOMB SITE, PANAMA—STIRLING 253
pots in the tomb. Had they been broken, it is likely the looters
would have thrown them away. It is our impression that this is an
early ware, possibly the earliest type of tomb ware from Panama.
An apparently related type is found in Chiriqui. This type was
first described by Holmes (1888, p. 87). In his classification of
Chiriqui wares he describes it as the scarified group. Holmes states:
This group is represented by about forty specimens and is worthy of especial
attention. It comes from the graves of two localities, one near C. E. Taylor’s
hacienda, north of David, on the slopes of Mount Chiriqui, and the other at
Alanje, southwest of David. As a variety of ware it stands so entirely alone
that had it arrived unlabeled no one would have recognized its affinities with
Chiriquian art. It is rather inferior in material, grace of form, and surface
finish, and the decoration appears to belong to a lower grade of culture than that
of the other groups.
Holmes speculates that it is a degenerate type, and therefore late.
He says further (ibid., pp. 88-89):
Nearly all of the vessels are tripods, but a few have rounded or flat bottoms and
a few are supplied with annular stands. The walls are thick and the shapes are
uncouth or clumsy. The paste is coarse, poorly baked, and friable; near the surface
it is a warm reddish or yellowish gray; within the mass it is a dark gray... .
These vessels are embellished by painting, incising, or scarifying and by modeling
in relief. Color was not employed in the production of designs, but a dark Indian
red pigment was daubed over that part of the surface not occupied by incised
ornament. Little cr no slip was used and the rude geometric patterns were
executed with pointed tools in a very haphazard manner.
In general Holmes’ description fits the KE! Limén material, but there
are a number of differences. His material has no vase forms, and
tripod supports are lacking in the El Limén specimens as well as the
application of red paint. The tripod supports are evidently solid.
However, the scarified designs are similar, as are the flat and rounded
bottoms. Scarified material is shown in Holmes’ illustrations (figs.
118 to 127). His figure 122 in particular resembles the material
from El Limén.
More recently, Wolfgang Haberland (1960) has published another
find of ceramics closely similar to the Holmes material, from Aguas
Buenas in Costa Rica, just across the border from Panama.
At Mojara in Herrera Province, we found in our excavations a
somewhat similar vase, associated with polychrome ware. This is a
much more handsome piece and is made of harder, fine-textured ware.
The encircling element consists of two notched fillet bands, the lower
of which turns downward at each side to the base of the vessel. At
this point on each side is a projecting conventionalized animal head
from which two more notched fillets run downward, parallel with the
other two.
Under the outflaring rim is a triple row of heavy punctate dots.
Between these and the encircling fillets is a zone of highly polished
254 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
rich mahogany brown slip. The interior of the vessel is of the same
polished brown.
The fundamental points of difference with the El Limén specimens
is that the Mojara example has a hollow base, lacks the slender waist,
and lacks incising. Also, it is somewhat larger, being 9! inches high.
Dr. S. K. Lothrop kindly called to my attention a number of speci-
mens, from near David, in the Peabody Museum, Harvard University
(C-2809, C-2813, C-2817, C—2823) which also belong to this class of
ware. Dr. Lothrop shares our impression that this is an early type of
ware.
While the small number of specimens from El! Limén make specula-
tion unsafe, nevertheless we feel that this material, lacking paint and
tripod supports, is the earlier form. The simple solid supports of the
Chiriqui and Costa Rican sites may well be ancestral to the later
developed hollow supports in the same area. The simple application
of red paint may be a forerunner of the later elaborate polychrome
ware, while the primitive applique work might precede the later more
complex type found, for example, on Chiriqui alligator ware.
The simple scarification and incising of El Limén ware could in
turn be an outgrowth from the type of decoration found on the early
Monagrillo ware.
REFERENCES
HABERLAND, WOLFGANG.
1960. Cien anos de arqueologia en Panama. Loteria No. 12. Panama.
Hotmgss, W. H.
1888. Ancient art of the Province of Chiriqui, Colombia. 6th Ann. Rep.
Bur. Amer. Ethnol. for 1884-85, pp. 3-187.
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 27
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Incised slender vases.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 72
ARCHEOLOGICAL NOTES ON ALMIRANTE BAY,
BOCAS DEL TORO, PANAMA
By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING
255
682-611—64——_21
CONTENTS
PAGE
erGrocguction=s - Petar ot: ee eee ere ie eee es BARS IW RR ed ae we 259
ES HOm Calne Oro Ui Glee ee eee eee Ne ey eee 260
| o PEEVS WAIT CS) IDs CIS Es Neo Re SP xb ncn Ace SD ea oa See 263
DIPeIeeher DP ianinpen esas Meee aoe Al Ue eae ee KLE ee See 264
Darklands(Boc=h)wen sees ees. eel Shee eee e eee hottest 264.
Wanrklamde (aver (BOG—2) ese e eS ce eee ee A 267
peace Drager 0G 3) eerie te Ee ee A ais
Duele ge Ol Gates ee Bet cine el AU eh eee eel PE ee ba es) 277
Waecnotel arigiaee) 7.08 eee ee eee SRA Se Ree See ay a a 278
SIG PRA ye ne See Niet Se MENS hs ere re Oe NS yh TC rE ee Coe 278
Pe pies OU Oi Plies: aie 2 Pe De eee a, ee se hia 279
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
(All plates follow page 284)
28. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1.
29. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1.
30. Tripod vessels and subglobular bowls from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
31. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
32. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
33. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
34. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
35. Large vessels with high collars from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
36. Ceramic ware exteriors from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
37. Interiors of sherds shown in plate 36.
38. Nonceramic artifacts from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
39. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3.
40. Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3.
41. Stone female figure from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay; stone metates from
Cricamola River and Bastimentos Key.
42. Midden mound and mortars, Darkland Point.
43. Stone artifacts from Escudo Island, Jungle Point, and Darkland Cave.
44, Jaguar heads and double-bitted axes.
TEXT FIGURES
PAGE
18: Sherds from Bocas del Tore, ‘site U2... 5. 2-2 teste ee ee eee 266
19. Bow) with slated. pedestal base... =. 225 oo 268
20:) snerds trom Bocas del Lorawisite*2= .. 222. 22 Ae ee Bs 270
21.) Sherds rom boeds, del Lore, sive 2. 2) 246 Lk Ue ek 271
22; (Sherds from); Bocas del Toro, site: 2. 4.2 222... 2- buss. oh Reeelic tee, 272
Zo. phaliow bowltrom Bocas del Foro,)site 22.0.0 et 274
24 Shere froma isocas;del Toro, Site d24 20 220 gat oe ee ee el 276
fh nen
7
5 alvagtTvieo
Zaa@
named os eee o
Geet - alts aS a <. oi Be
°C ETS EERE sag,
| gl ne eee te © Pee ae my
er ieee = et ey (ian)
We geese ae ee .... &-208y aa9 B
éi< sae ogta eater : -» a AH} oul ate,
) Pee en Pia -, +4004
BYE “ : ie ——— =e : haulst,
ave ia ; |
Mie) “wo. eee eohia W
SVOTTAR TATE
ey ATT
(ERE yay Wola! aati (LA)
i 4Jis io) (8b eaene diets out a
J otls oot lob '4eotl cont saw ota
i uite wt Ieb eanofl ator wlwod saiudcladie haw dea °
»& Mia OTGT lal 4amil sod saw blo ne ;
Lal oOT fab eanofl ard) seaw ohn
C wiz oT feb easohl daa S187f OF iY 4
S etie rot lab eet! mol aiew one
© aliz- 0207 lat caso sol) enillan Agi! fire aloraby &
L olie wi0T lab enq0ll moni! ewohsied ea ae
a sieia al avwoth oteads ty agi
2 ath wT thb cesclt din eine bie a5)
2 at uno lbh 40008 inet new
© 61 aol toh sabth nial Sh Pe
Nur? vstnlony Siote ;4atl wtitedaiA >Draala? eave) mes] etna aaale
AS
Ve hnaMutl hua dole aluavl jocle! oboow’l ast elawtiien |
Tal wninsmiteal ba» writ ala
Antod bualisel! amivenr ban bag
#ote Iuttid-aldpoh bua shed wand
Stor TACT
ere e -1 att rol Ini aneodl sooth at
; phe omy + pp bd. Indeed Teatial: dfiwt
-2 str cas’? fob gaol! nnd ef
; . «8 Ot% moT bb econ ator ale
a. nee Smee J eth owT sb andok orort gf
eae 7 agp tetra sih rt ce
a® |; . iia
ARCHEOLOGICAL NOTES ON ALMIRANTE BAY
BOCAS DEL TORO, PANAMA
By Marraew W. ano Marion STIRLING
INTRODUCTION
Since there appears to be no information on the archeology of the
Almirante Bay-Chiriqui Lagoon region, we, together with Richard H.
Stewart, took occasion to visit briefly Almirante Bay during the month
of April 1953 as an extension of our work for the National Geographic
Society-Smithsonian Institution on the north coast of Panama the
preceding winter.
During 10 days of rather intensive activity, we visited all of the
principal islands and a considerable portion of the mainland coast of
Almirante Bay. Systematic questioning of natives elicited very little
information as to archeological sites. Most informants denied having
seen or heard of evidences of aboriginal occupation in the area. In-
deed, on completion of our survey we concluded that archeological
sites in the vicinity are neither numerous nor conspicuous. However,
we did locate three sites worthy of excavation, and we photographed
several carved stone objects found in the region.
In the relatively level area north of Almirante, which has been
extensively cleared for banana plantations, nothing appears to have
come to light. In the remainder of the district the search for sites is
hampered by the heavy growth of tropical jungle which covers most of
the ground.
The Almirante Bay-Chiriqui Lagoon region apparently followed the
pattern of the rest of the north coast of Panama in that permanent
settlements were established toward the headwaters of the rivers and
not along the coast.
The immediate incentive for our visit to Almirante was an invita-
tion from Dr. Gustav Engler, director of the Chiriqui Land Company
Hospital at that place. Dr. Engler has long been interested in the
antiquities of Central America and has a small collection of artifacts
from Costa Rica and Panama.
259
260 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
As a guide, Dr. Engler secured for us the services of Teodor F.
Machazek, a longtime resident of the region and a surveyor well
acquainted with the section. Through the courtesy of Mr. G. D.
Munch, at that time superintendant of the Chiriqui Land Company,
we were the guests of the company, enjoying the facilities of their
spacious and comfortable guesthouse during our entire stay. We
owe a particular debt also to Rev. Robert W. Turner III, who gen-
erously gave us the use of his launch for our rather extensive survey.
This courtesy was essential to the success of the work since almost
all travel in the region is by water.
We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the Bureau
of American Ethnology, for the line drawings in this report.
Finally, we wish to thank Mr. and Mrs. T. W. Dunn, who ac-
companied us to Boca del Drago. They gave unstintingly of their
time and information collected regarding archeological sites during
a long residence in Central America while in the employ of the United
Fruit Co.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Information concerning the aboriginal inhabitants of Almirante
Bay and the Chiriqui Lagoon is very meager. However, there can
be little doubt that the Indians occupying the region at the beginning
of the 16th century were the Guaymi, whose descendants still live in
the vicinity.
Curiously enough, the most satisfactory descriptions are those of
the Columbus expedition of 1502.
The interpreters abducted by Columbus at Puerto Limén, Costa
Rica, could speak the language of the natives as far south as the
Coclé del Norte River, an area which corresponds pretty well with
the hypothetical distribution of the Guaymi along this coast. Ferdi-
nand Columbus, who gives the most complete account, does not
describe the habitations of the natives encountered on Almirante Bay
and the Chiriqui Lagoon, but he states that somewhat farther to the
eastward they lived in single houses separated one from the other by
considerable distances. He also states that their permanent habita-
tions were not along the coast, but well up the rivers; an observation
confirmed by our archeological reconnaissance in the area.
Oviedo, in describing the 1536 expedition of Felipe Gutierrez on the
north coast of Veraguas, relates that their villages normally consisted
of four or five large houses. This description would seem to correspond
with the archeological evidence at the Darkland site which we examined
on Almirante Bay.
The scant archeological remains around Almirante Bay and the
Chiriqui Lagoon do not seem to bear out the rather considerable
sy Po} P ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 261
population indicated by the Columbus accounts. It is probable
that the natives living up the rivers heard of the coming of the ships
of Columbus, the first to visit this coast, and descended to the bay for
the occasion, thus accounting for an abnormal concentration of people.
Ferdinand Columbus tells us that as soon as the ships anchored in
Almirante Bay, which the natives called Carambaru, the boats went
to one of the islands where there were 20 canoes on the beach. The
natives were described as being ‘‘as naked as the day they were born.”’
One of these was wearing, hanging around his neck, a gold disk;
another, a gold eagle.
On the mainland the Spaniards were met by 10 canoes and saw con-
siderably more gold worn in the form of ornaments. The men
were described as wearing narrow loincloths as their only garments,
with their faces and bodies painted all over with designs in red, black,
and white.
It is interesting to note that the Guaymi today still use these same
colors for their face and body paintings, although now they have
adopted clothing.
Pedro de Ledesma says that at one place 80 canoes gathered around
the ships, and that the natives wore gold ornaments consisting of
“crowns,” disks, eagles, frogs, tigers, etc. These, of course, were of
the same type as the gold ornaments that have been found in such
abundance in graves in Chiriqui and Veraguas. Unfortunately, the
Spaniards were not much interested in describing other aspects of
material culture, although a number of stray items are mentioned.
From Almirante Bay the ships of Columbus entered the Chiriqui
Lagoon, called Aburena by the Indians. Here they were met in a
more hostile manner by even greater numbers of Indians, who blew
horns, beat drums, and created a tremendous din. This reminds us
of the present-day noisemaking activities of the Guaymi during their
“Balseria’’ ceremonies.
At Guaiga, a river 12 leagues east of the Chiriqui Lagoon, the
Spaniards again landed among a large concentration of Indians. Just
beyond here, at a place called Catiba, Ferdinand Columbus says:
This was the first place in the Indies where they saw any sign of a structure,
which was a great mass of wall or imagry, that to them seemed to be of lime and
stone; the admiral ordered a piece of it to be brought away as a memorial of
that antiquity.
Since Columbus speaks of the structure as “an antiquity,” it
evidently was not constructed by the contemporary natives. When
we were on our reconnaissance of the Panama north coast, we made
diligent inquiries of many natives who professed to know the region
well but all denied seeing or hearing of such a structure. We are
inclined to believe that the men with Columbus saw some natural
262 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
formation, possibly a limestone dike, which they mistook for a wall.
There is a great deal of limestone in this region, such as the cliff and
ridge where our cave site Boc-2, at the east end of Almirante Bay,
is located.
In 1951 when we were on the Rio Indio we heard from several
natives of a “‘casa de laja’”’ on one of the tributaries farther up the
river. It was described as a stone masonry ruin, definitely not of
Spanish construction. With the stone wall of Columbus in mind, we
went to considerable trouble to visit the ruin, eventually succeeding.
The ‘“‘casa de laja’”’ turned out to be a curious natural tunnel about 50
yards long through a horizontally stratified sandstone formation. The
only evidence of occupation, past or present, was a huge cluster of
bats hanging from the ceiling.
At some time before 1540 an Aztec colony was established in the
Sixaola Valley, on the mainland back of Almirante Bay. Before the
middle of the 17th century this group, known as the Sigua, had moved
to Bastimentos Island in Almirante Bay, where they eventually
settled in four towns. Here they maintained themselves with varying
degrees of fortune until about the year 1760. The interesting history
of this band, the southernmost outpost of the Aztecs, has been out-
lined by Lothrop.
Rev. Ephraim Alphonse, who has lived among the Valiente Guaymi
for more than 25 years and speaks the language fluently, has found
some interesting traditions that evidently refer to this group. The
Valiente Guaymi still retain the term ‘‘“Montezuma,”’ meaning ruler.
A tradition which is frequently recounted at the present time re-
lates to the ‘‘Dekos,”’ a group of conquerors who came from the
north in large canoes having paddles studded with pearls. Their
leader was called Siri Klave. ‘The Dekos are always pictured as being
more civilized and smarter than the Guaymi. Some of the tales
refer to contests in wits between Guaymi and Dekos leaders. In
these contests the Guaymi were always defeated, as they were in
military combat (Alphonse, 1956).
We spent considerable time on Bastimentos in a futile search for
remains that might indicate a settlement of the Aztec Colony, which
all the evidence seems to indicate was located here. Not only did
our personal search result negatively, excepting for a few nondescript
sherds near the mouth of a small stream by the present village of
Bastimentos, but the old inhabitants who had spent their lives farming
on the island insisted that they had seen no sherds nor other evidence
of occupation, except a metate and a mano (pl. 41). We visited the
spots where these were found, but saw no evidence of a site.
After the voyage of Columbus, the Almirante region acquired a
reputation for being rich in gold. It was frequently visited thereafter
Ant ron. rap. ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 263
by gold seekers and slavers with the result that native culture was
pretty well broken down. There is little in the records of these more
or less transient visits that is of help to the archeologist.
Modern accounts of the Guaymi are unsatisfactory, even for areas
considerably removed from the Northwest Panama Coast.
During the last quarter of the 19th century A. L. Pinart made
some observations on the Guaymi of the Chiriqui Lagoon region,
and more recently they have been studied by Ephraim Alphonse.
Practically all of the available early source material has been
collected and published by Lothrop (1950) in his excellent Veraguas
report.
CERAMIC STUDIES
A considerable amount of time was spent in examining the temper
of the various wares from the several sites herein described. The
only instruments used in this connection were small hand lenses.
Samples of the wares were shown to several professional archeologists.
Their conclusions as to the nature of the tempering material differed
so widely among themselves and with our own tentative determina-
tions that we decided to follow the advice of Miss Anna O. Shepherd
of the Ceramic Technological Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of
Washington, D.C., and describe them in general terms rather than
to guess at specific descriptions, a practice likely to lead to false
assumptions.
All clays are originally derived from decomposition of igneous
rocks and contain a certain amount of grit and fragments of un-
altered rock. With the naked eye or a hand lens it is impossible to
tell in most instances whether the grit is natural or hand ground.
In general, the temper of the pottery from Almirante Bay is rounded
sand mixed with angular particles.
Similar difficulties were experienced in studying the nature of
slips. It was not always possible to distinguish between self slips,
applied slips, and effects obtained by polishing. Here again we have
tried to be not too categorical in our designations.
Hardness was determined by scratch tests in accordance with the
Mohs scale.
Of the pottery excavated in the three Almirante Bay sites, the
significant pieces are illustrated and complete data are given with the
descriptions of each plate.
Since the excavations were small, we felt that it would be pre-
mature to give names to the pottery types encountered.
Colors have been identified in the Munsell color system. As
every ceramist knows, the colors of primitive pottery vary considerably
because of uneven firing conditions, as well as other factors. The
264 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
same pot may contain several colors, blending, for example, from
weak yellowish orange, to moderate orange, light brown, and black.
In describing the pottery this fact has been taken into consideration
and the best personal opinion given of each specimen illustrated in
order to convey to the reader a proper understanding of the wares.
The laboratory studies were made under fluorescent light. In
instances where the buff has definitely fired moderate orange, it is so
described. In Boc-1 and Boc-3, the buffs generally fired orange.
In Boc-2, the buffs frequently fired brown.
The equivalents of Munsell color symbols are given according to
1.S.C.C. (Inter-Society Color Council) Standards. When a specimen
is unique, the Munsell equivalent is given in the text (Judd and
Kelly, 1939). The following tabulation gives the general color
equivalents used in this paper:
Munsell I.8.C.C.
ighispuit ee TY S20) Se ones Pale yellowish orange.
Buh Oia iad SO LOM 4S 2 Oe is ee Weak yellowish orange.
LOVERS /Ge ts Set Weak yellowish orange.
TONPRG/AS = Meee ee Light yellowish brown.
Darkibuiiese. -eees ‘yp R751 sae oe eee reer Light brown.
Dark brownies 2252 = OWE Zee Sere Dusky brown.
Gravee. Sosa ne Ra aE) eat i el Moderate orange.
HOR S/S. toate et Moderate reddish orange.
Rliedke at. teers aes GRS5/S ieee re iG Moderate red.
PORE Soe Bae eS Moderate reddish brown.
Dupaky rede: be si \5_ ae DR): ee ae Dusky red.
Deep Teds 86 5-2 Otte] ee eee Deep red.
SITE DESCRIPTIONS
DARKLAND (BOC-1)
In the southern part of the bay, south of Cristobal Island, a long
narrow point known as Darkland projects into the bay. This had
been partially cleared for cultivation and the grazing of stock. The
peninsula is formed by a rather flat-topped ridge which gradually
increases in elevation from the point. Scattered along the top of
this ridge were four large mortars made from unshaped stones (pl.
42,6). Just above this area and about 300 yards from the point, we
discovered four midden mounds, each about 40 feet in diameter and
5 feet in height; apparently each was the refuse mound for a single
house. Having no facilities for carrying much material at the time of
our visit, we made in one of these mounds a single small excavation
about 4 feet square and 2 feet deep. The mound proved to be rich in
sherds and other materials. Among the more abundant forms were
subglobular bowls, with incurving rims, of buff-colored ware with a
A OMo1 P? ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 265
coarse temper. This ware is characterized by a gray to black core, with
margins ranging from weak yellowish orange to moderate orange.
These were decorated with elongate punctations in rows, between
incised parallel lines. The designs are geometric and tend toward
triangular forms. Some of these bowls were further decorated with
small nodes or bosses connected with incised lines or roughened
bands. One specimen was of much thicker ware and had an excurvate
rim (pl. 28, a-“).
Also abundant were sherds of large vessels with modeled applique
designs on the body. One had two leaping porpoises (pl. 29, a).
Another was an octopus (pl. 28, 7), while still another fragment
displayed what seems to be the tail of a fish (pl. 28, n).
One curious sherd consists of what appears to be a thick beveled
rim with rectangular openings cut below the rim. It is possible that
it is a part of a slotted pedestal base. If so, it is unusually thick and
heavy (pl. 29, f; fig. 18, e).
Other pieces were from large pots with slightly outcurving rims.
Some of these have red paint on the lip, others on either the exterior
or interior. The majority are polished light buff on the interior
(pls. 28; 29, e, 1).
Excurvate, buff-colored rims with combed decoration on the interior
and smooth on the exterior were almost identical with similar pieces
from the site at Boca del Drago (Boc-3). This is a buff-colored ware
with coarse tempering material (pl. 28, &).
One of the most individual wares is rather thin with finely ground
temper and fine line red painting on a light buff slip (pl. 28, m).
Two sherds appear to be longitudinal sections of hollow vessel
supports. The fact that one of these has horizontal red line painting
strengthens this hypothesis since this is a normal type of decoration
for the typical conical base tripod vessel characteristic of Chiriqui, ex-
amples of which were found in the nearby cave site (Boc-2).
Several small sherds were of very thin fine paste ware with polished
surface painted red on buff. Because of the small size of the sherds it
was impossible to deduce the vessel forms, but they were probably of
small size.
Thick body sherds from large pots were quite abundant. These had
a coarse sand temper and were usually fired buff on the exterior and
black on the interior. Some of these had combed decoration on the
exterior, some were smooth. This is apparently the same ware as that
with modeled animals on the body, and is analogous to the large urns
from Boc-3.
One flat awl with sharp point and sharp edges, made apparently
from the leg bone of a deer, was the only bone implement found.
266 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
h
)
Ficure 18.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 1. a, Large rim sherd with applique porpoises,
smooth orange interior, pl. 29, a; b, buff punctate bowl, smooth rim, triangular design,
pl. 28, a; c, buff interior, exterior blackened with charcoal, pl. 29, b; d, smooth buff
exterior and interior, pl. 29, 7; e, heavy slotted rim (or base ?), pl. 29, f; f, light buff
exterior and interior, red painted rim, pl. 29, d; g, smooth buff exterior and interior,
punctate ware with incising, pl. 28, b; h, buff surfaces, interior of rim is combed, pl. 28,
k; 1, light buff exterior and interior with red painted lip, pl. 29, c; 7, rough buff punctate
ware with incising, pl. 28, c; k, smooth buff interior with red painted lip, pl. 28, 0; J,
smooth buff with inside lip painted red, pl. 29, k; m, smooth light buff interior with lip
painted red, pl. 29, 7; n, smooth light buff interior, charcoal on exterior, lip painted
red, pl. 29, e.
Scattered throughout the excavation were a number of flint flakes and
many coral branches.
The above-described material, it should be remembered, came from
a small test pit and represents at best a most incomplete sample.
Anoo%o1 P ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 267
Boc-1 is by far the most promising site that we located on our survey
of Almirante Bay. The small mounds are rich in content and a full
scale excavation would without doubt give key results for this virtually
unknown area.
DARKLAND CAVE (BOC-2)
On a high jungle-covered ridge about 2 miles southwest of the Dark-
land peninsula there is a limestone cliff about 100 feet high. Along
the base of this cliff are a number of caves containing the remains of
human burials and accompanying offerings. The native who guided
us to this spot had discovered the caves a few years before and said
that he and his father had removed several complete pots, of which he
was unable to give an adequate description, and a stone metate
carved in the form of a jaguar.
We selected the most promising looking of the caves and excavated
it completely. The cave, whose opening was about 20 feet across, ex-
tended about 30 feet into the cliff, with a ceiling of irregular height.
The last 20 feet of the cave was filled to within about a foot of the
ceiling and could not be entered until the fill was removed. The bulk
of the artifacts recovered and a few fragments of human bone were in
the upper 12 inches of the deposit. No evidence of human occupation
was found below this surface level, although the fill averaged from 3 to
4 feet in depth.
Objects of stone consisted of a well-carved jaguar head broken from
a metate of Costa Rica-Chiriqui type, and eight celts of mediocre
finish (pl. 43, g-n). There were none of the type with flaring edge so
common in Veraguas. One small triangular polished celt of a blue
slatelike stone is 10 cm. long and 5 cm. wide at the blade. It is flat
on one side and convex on the other. A chisel of limestone was 19.5
em. long. There was also a small polishing stone of bright red jasper
about 5 cm. in diameter (pl. 38, e, f, g). Scattered throughout the
surface layer were many large marine conchs, principally Strombus
gigas Linné and Charonia iritonis nobilis Conrad, and about 20 arti-
facts of unknown use made from the spire of the conch with a circular
hole 5 cm. in diameter in the center (pl. 38, a—d).
Although five or six nearly complete vessels were recovered, the
bulk of the pottery was in the form of scattered sherds, representing a
considerable variety of forms and wares.
Apparently, the great majority of the vessels originally had a
buff-colored surface, although some examples were dark buff and
brown. In addition, various sherds are blackened by carbon, discolor-
ing the surface as well as the paint.
All the sherds are coated to a certain extent with a white deposit
caused by the dust in the limestone cave, a condition making it
268 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
difficult to decide the original color of the pottery. In some instances,
the red paint has turned orange and in others, dusky brown; it is
difficult to decide the original hue. One example of this wide range in
hue can be seen on the horizontal red line striping on the legs of the
tripod vessel (pl. 30, 6).
There were five examples of tripod vessels, two of which are fairly
complete. One of these consists of smooth buff ware well coated with
lime on both interior and exterior (pl. 30, a). The outflaring rim is
4.7 cm. wide. The interior is decorated with four groups of seven red
perpendicular lines 0.3 cm. wide, spaced quadrilaterally. Each
grouping is approximately 3.8 cm. wide. The edge of the rim is also
painted red.
The other fairly complete specimen has the rim missing, but this
was probably a bowl-shaped form (pl. 30, b). The body is roughened
by horizontal striating. The legs are smooth, decorated with hori-
zontal red line painting and three perpendicular slots 5.0 cm. long,
0.5 cm. wide. Two slots are on either side of the leg, near the top;
the other in the center front near the foot, which is broken off. The
most nearly complete leg has a modeled animal figure seated on the
upper edge. The interior of the vessel is smooth and buff in color.
Most of the exterior is blackened by carbon. This specimen is almost
identical with two figured by Wassén, 1949 (figs., 9, a; 10) found near
Boquete, Chiriqui.
Of the remaining three examples, two were of the buff striated type
and the other, consisting of a conical base, is of thick buff ware. The
O /
SCALE IN INCHES ee
(oa a Piva aE ime Ua le al rie Pee
re ae PII ais: Sal ation Ry aloha:
—— aS
— ee
= SQ
——— ae.
RED BLACK BUFF
Ficure 19.—Bowl with slotted pedestal base. Black core, dark buff margins; fine temper;
base and interior of bowl polished dark buff; deep red slip on exterior of bowl on which
were painted black perpendicular stripes extending from the rim to the juncture with
the base; see pl. 31, f.
Anthrop. Pap.
"No. 72] - ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 269
exterior is polished and partially dark brown from carbon. All of these
are of hard fine-tempered ware, with black core and buff margins.
There was one small pedestal base bowl (pl. 31, f; fig. 19) with three
rectangular horizontal slots in the base. The base and the interior
of the bowl are polished dark buff ware. The exterior of the bowl
has a deep red slip on which were painted black perpendicular stripes
extending from the rim to the juncture with the base, 6.8 cm. long.
Vestiges of eight stripes can be seen on the portion of the bowl which
was found. Whether the stripes encircled the entire bowl or were
painted in groups cannot be ascertained. The ware has a fine temper,
is rather thin, and is fired to a dark buff on the surfaces with a black
core. This was the only pedestal base found.
Frying-pan incensarios were represented by one specimen, a trans-
verse piece broken off from the base of the handle. It is made from a
hard fine-tempered ware with a buff polished surface. It is painted
red along the edges and has one transverse red line, 0.6 cm. wide
(pl. 33, c). Similar but complete examples of this type were found by
us at the Coclé site of Mojara in Herrera Province.
Small plain subglobular bowls were represented by seven speci-
mens, two of which were more or less complete (pl. 30, c, d). These
are rather crudely made from a buff-colored ware. The surface
typically is carelessly smoothed. Plate 30, c, has a body diameter of
8.4 cm. and a body height of 8.0cm. Plate 30, d, has a body diameter
of 11.0 cm. and a body height of 7 cm.
Two of the subglobular bowls were polished brown, one polished
dark buff, and another buff with a red lip. Most had small outflaring
rims, some with rolled lips. Some were carbonized on the exterior
from having been on an open fire. The rim variations can best be
seen from the illustrations (pl. 33, a, 6, e, f). One variation consisted
of a combed exterior with a crude rectangular pattern and small
nodes on the shoulder (pl. 31, 6).
There were eight examples of bowls with vertical strap handles.
Judging from the fragments found, these had been low hemispherical
bowls with outflaring rims to which were attached a pair of opposing
strap handles (pl. 31, a, c, d, g; fig. 21, e, f, g, 6).
Plate 31, a, is made of polished dark buff ware weathered brown
in places. The lip of the rim is painted red and extends 1 cm. onto the
top of the strap handle. Directly in front of the strap handle on the
interior of the outflaring rim are six vertical red lines, 0.2 cm. wide, 3
em. long. The strap handle was modeled and stuck on the pot care-
lessly. It is 3.5 cm. wide.
Plate 31, ¢, is buff ware with a rim painted red extending 0.4 cm.
down the exterior of the bowl and 0.4 cm. onto the strap handle,
where it joins the rim. There is an irregular spot of red paint on the
270 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
J apa )
Figure 20.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Shallow bowl, pedestal base (?), red
painted lip, dark buff interior and exterior, pl. 34, g; b, buff ware with smooth interior
and exterior and red lip; c, buff ware, lip painted red with traces of red on interior; d,
buff ware, red painted lip and convex curving collar, exterior carbon coated, pl. 36, ); e,
shallow bowl or pedestal base (?), lip painted red, dark buff interior, red design on
interior; f, polished buff interior, exterior rough and carbonized, red lip, pl. 32, 7; g, buff
ware with a rough exterior, smooth, interior, and fine temper, pl. 36, d; h, buff ware,
carbonized black, polished interior, rough exterior, pl. 36, f; 1, red painted lip, rough
exterior and smooth buff interior; 7, rough carbonized exterior and smooth buff interior;
k, rough exterior and smooth buff interior.
body of the vessel. The temper is coarse. The exterior of the vessel
and the rim are smooth, while the interior is slightly rough. The
strap handle is 2.7 cm. wide.
Plate 31, d, is buff ware weathered brown. The rim probably
had been painted red. There appears to have been a strip of pottery
Anim oP] 2 ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 271
Ficure 21.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Buff ware, exterior blackened by
carbon, had strap handle, incised design, roughened zones, bosses, smooth interior, pl.
31, e; b, buff with loop handle, covered with limestone dust inside and out, pl. 31, g; thin
buff tripod jar, carbonized exterior and smooth interior; d, polished dark buff interior
and exterior, pl. 33, b; e¢, polished dark buff, lip painted red and vertical lines on interior
of rim, strap handle, pl. 31, a; f, buff interior and exterior with red rim, pl. 31, c; g, buff
weathered brown with smooth interior and exterior and strap handle, pl. 31, d; h, buff,
polished interior, exterior of rim roughened, pl. 33, f; 7, buff weathered brown with
polished interior, pl. 33, a.
appliqued on top of the strap handle as decoration. The handle
is 1.7 cm. wide.
One specimen has a plain incurving rim. This had a roughened
zone below the rim, decorated with incised lines connecting small
hemispherical nodes. Another roughened zone runs around the middle
of the bowl. The edge of the rim is painted dark red (pl. 31, e; fig.
21, a).
682-611 6422
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
272
Ficure 22.
opposite page.)
Forl egend, see
An 21 8P- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 273
Plate 31, g, shows buff ware with a rolled everted rim and a loop handle.
The most abundant form consisted of fragments of 17 large sub-
spherical pots with medium outflaring rims. Of these, three were
sufficiently complete to give an idea of the body shape. There is
considerable individual variation in the rim forms (pl. 34, a, }, ¢;
He 22 as, e)).
One broken, but almost complete, example had the entire exterior
surface roughened as though by rolling it with a corncob or a rough
fabric. The interior is well smoothed. The lip is painted red.
A series of rather undefined vertical ridges runs around the middle
of the body as an additional decorative feature, and a series of indenta-
tions runs around the base of the collar (pl. 34, a; fig. 22, a).
The remaining examples are carelessly smoothed on the exterior
and carefully smoothed on the interior. Some had red-painted lips
and some were coated with carbon from being over an open fire.
The ware is coarse, fired to a black core, with moderately reddish
orange margins and dark-buff surfaces. Most have plain round lips,
but on two examples the lips are beveled.
There were seven fragments (six illustrated) from large vessels
with high collars (pl. 35; fig. 22, ¢, f). The collars are roughened on
the exterior by combing. One has a smooth zone below the point
where the collar joins the body; below this the combing begins again
(pl. 35, d). In all examples the interior is carefully smoothed. Two
had a red-painted lip. On the rim, one sherd has part of an appliqued
octopus, suggestive of similar designs from Boc-3. This sherd has
a dark-buff polished interior and a red-painted lip. The exterior is
rather rough (pl. 35, a, fig. 22, d).
Large shallow bowls were represented by two specimens. These
are similar in form to the pedestal base “‘fruteras’ from Coclé and
Veraguas, but probably did not have such bases since none were found
in Boc-2. One of the specimens has a beveled lip, painted red, and
Ficure 22.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 2. a, Buff ware, red painted lip, smooth
interior, roughened exterior, pl. 34, a; b, buff ware, red lip, exterior rough and somewhat
blackened, pl. 34, ¢; c, buff ware, smooth interior, exterior of collar combed, smooth on
exterior below collar, pl. 35, c; d, dark buff polished interior, exterior blackened, rough,
applique design, lip painted red, pl. 35, a; ¢, dark buff ware, roughly combed collar,
smooth interior, pl. 34, b; f, polished dark buff interior, combed exterior, pl. 35, b; g,
polished buff ware, fine combing on collar, smooth below collar, deep incised groove
separating collar from body, pl. 9, h; A, smooth buff slip on interior, exterior rough, pl. 36,
1; 1, smooth buff interior, exterior rough, deep groove separates collar from body, red
lip, pl. 36, &; 7, polished buff on interior, roughened exterior, red lip, pl. 36, e; 2, dark-
buff ware, smooth interior, rough exterior, lip painted red, pl. 34, e; /, body sherd, buff
ware coated with limestone dust, smooth exterior and interior; m, dark buff ware, smooth
interior and exterior, pl. 34, f; , polished buff interior, rough buff interior; 0, carbonized
buff ware, smooth interior and exterior, pl. 36, c.
274. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
has a smooth exterior and interior (pl. 34, g; fig. 20, a). The other
has a plain lip also painted red, and a design consisting of six red
stripes 0.6 cm. wide and 7.5 cm. long projecting into the dark buff
interior. Each stripe is rounded at the end, not blunt or squared off
(pl. 34, d; figs. 23, 20, e). Theexterior isroughened by combing below
- Kixse
Kooy x
« BSI RS
KS ore KX,
SCALE /N INCHES
(i 2 Oot Ly
CM.
Ficure 23.—Shallow bowl from Bocas del Toro, site 2. Polished dark buff interior
decorated with 6 red stripes and red painted lip. Exterior badly eroded but apparently
had vertical ridges around middle similar to pl. 34, a. Medium temper. 1 cm. thick.
the rim, and below this is a row of roughened verticalridges. In both
examples the ware is fairly thick and is grit tempered. The color on
the surface is dark buff, weathered a dark brown.
There were four body sherds of thin, hard, fine paste ware, evenly
fired, with no black core, 0.4 cm. thick. Three of these have a dark-
orange (2.5YR 5/8) (Munsell system) smooth surface, while the other
has a burnished-brown (10YR 3.8/2) exterior surface. These are
definitely different from the other sherds.
There were three sherds of red on buff ware. Two are rims with
red-painted lip and fine vertical red lines on the interior of the rim.
The sherds are 0.8 and 0.6 cm. thick, respectively. The interior is
polished, the exterior rough (pl. 32, f, h). The other example is a
body sherd with smooth surface, having painted on it a simple red-line
geometric design. The interior is smooth and unpainted buff
(pl. 32, e).
Among the miscellaneous specimens was a low concave vessel
support painted red where it joined the body of the vessel. The
remainder of the exterior and the interior are buff. The beveled
supporting edge is roughened with diagonal scoring (pl. 33, d).
An oP ot *P- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 275
The neck of a small jar was of rather thin dark-buff ware. It was
encircled by two parallel rounded ridges decorated with crude incising
(pl. 32, b).
Part of the neck of a small vessel of hard medium-tempered ware
was decorated with lunate punctations in parallel rows between double
incised lines. This decorated area is separated by a rounded ridge
between incised lines from a smooth-zoned red band. ‘The interior
is definitely painted red on one half, probably the neck. The other
half is buff. The exterior design was zoned red on buff (pl. 32, ¢).
One sherd of rather thick, hard ware has a polished dark buff
(carbonized almost black) exterior with part of a raised design
(pl. 32, d).
Among other miscellaneous pieces was a flat base of dark-buff
ware (pl. 32, a).
The cave site (Boc-2) was probably a burial place, in which had
been placed offerings of shell, stone, and pottery. There was no
evidence of fires having been made in the cave. Furthermore, the
lowness of the ceiling would not have made it a suitable dwelling
site, nor would its location near the summit of a high steep mountain.
The presence of fragments of human bones would seem to make its
burial function certain. The pottery shows a connection on the one
hand with that from Boc-3 and on the other hand with Chiriqui
ware from the vicinity of Boquete. The lowest point, for some
distance, in the Continental Divide lies directly south of Almirante
Bay in direct line with Boquete. An old trail which is still in use
crosses this pass from the northern part of the Chiriqui Lagoon.
It is probable that this natural route was in use in aboriginal times.
BOCA DEL DRAGO (BOC-3)
At the extreme northwestern corner of Almirante Bay the Boca
del Drago is a narrow pass separating the mainland from Colon
Island. On Colon Island, on the east side of the pass, just below
Cauro Point, there is a cove with a crescent-shaped sand beach.
At a point toward the south end of the beach there was formerly
an aboriginal site, which has been largely destroyed in recent years
by wave action from storms. Several native fishermen living on the
cove told of large urns being exposed on the beach after these storms.
As described, these urns were as much as 3 feet in height, with wide
mouths and high outflaring collars or rims.
We conducted excavations on the beach in the area indicated
and found numerous sherds of such urns as well as fragments of
smaller vessels. There were also a few nondescript fragments of
human bones, suggesting that the large vessels were burial urns.
276 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
}
9
y
We made some tests in the forested, undisturbed soil back of the
The sherds recovered from the beach exhibited a fair variety.
Characteristically at this site, the paste was fired brownish black in
os
Ic CM ‘cme ——————4 Geer Natt
fine regular combing on exterior, band of extremely fine combing extending 2.5 cm. below
lip, pl. 39, 5; b, similar to ‘‘a” but with smooth area below lip and above fine combed
combed or impressed, grooved indentations outlining rim, 1.3 cm. from lip, pl. 30, a;
d, polished orange interior and rim, exterior buff blackened by carbon and rather rough,
same as ‘‘c,” pl. 40, 5; g, smooth buff interior, buff exterior has regular combing aisnilar
tOr va and “*b,” pl. 40, c; h, 1, smooth buff interior and exterior, pls. 40, 7, and 40, d,
beach, but found no traces of a village site or burials.
the core, to buff and moderate orange on the surface. In some ex-
A
Figure 24.—Sherds from Bocas del Toro, site 3. a, Polished orange interior and lip,
area, pl. 39, 7; c, buff interior and exterior, red paint on exterior of rim, interior deeply
pl. 39, d; e, dark buff blackened by carbon, smooth interior and exterior, pl. 39, ¢; f,
respectively.
Ane oy» ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 277
amples, it was fired 100 percent moderate orange. In other examples
the moderate orange surface is definitely due to polishing. In others
(pl. 40, d), the orange interior over buff paste may be due to a self
wash. Probably all the clay with coarse and moderate temper is
the same, and the buff or orange color variations are due to firing
conditions. The fine-tempered pastes (pls. 39, a; 40, 7, k) are defi-
nitely different.
Evidently smaller vessels were normally of a globular form with
rims that differed from straight to excurvate in varying degrees.
Some of these were painted red.
Some excurvate rims were decorated by combing on the interior
(pl. 40, a, 6), but had a smooth exterior. These were buff with a
medium temper.
One rim fragment had a looped handle attached to the rim (pl.
39, g). This piece was very coarse tempered and had a smooth
orange-buff exterior and interior. It is very similar to a specimen
found near Boquete, Chiriqui, and figured by Wassén (Wassén, 1949,
fig. 37). Another example was found by us at Utivé, Province of
Panama.
One solid tapering piece could have been a vessel support or a
heavy handle (pl. 40, 2).
A sherd of fine-paste, dusky yellowish-orange (8YR 6/6) ware,
had on it the applique figure of an animal. This piece is typical
Chiriqui alligator ware (pl. 39, a).
There was a single sherd of fine-tempered ware with a painted
design. The decoration consisted of bold red and black parallel
lines on a light-buff surface (pl. 40, e).
The only indication of the use of stone was a number of flint chips
or rejects.
On the whole, the ware of Boc-3 shows a close affinity to that in
Boc-1.
JUNGLE POINT
On a heavily forested ridge back of Almirante and near Western
River, we visited another site, where we conducted some excavations
with unsatisfactory results. A native who had made a clearing on
top of the ridge and had built a thatched hut told us he had found
potsherds, a clay figurine of a woman, and some stone specimens
while excavating a level place for his house. The figurine had been
lost, but we obtained from him three celts, two of a fine-grained bluish-
black stone and the other light gray. There was also a pestle of
limestone (pl. 43, c-f).
We excavated in an area adjoining the house, but found only a
few nondescript potsherds.
278 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
The most interesting point in connection with this site is that it
demonstrates that habitation sites apparently existed occasionally
on the tops of steep ridges.
COCOS ISLAND
We visited Cocos Island, one of the larger islands in the bay,
where we heard the familiar story that the natives knew of no ancient
habitation sites. One man, however, had found an interesting basalt
figure of Costa Rican type, which we photographed (pl. 41, a-8).
The figure represents a standing woman, holding her breasts in
her hands, with a human head hanging on her back. The finder
of the figure led us to the spot where the find had been made, but
we saw no evidence of a habitation there.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ALPHONSE, EpHraim §.
n.d. Among the Valiente Indians. London.
1956. Guaymi grammar and dictionary, with some ethnological notes.
Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 162.
CoLuMBUS, FERDINAND.
1744. The history of the life and actions of Admiral Christopher Columbus.
In “A collection of Voyages and Travels,’”’? by Awnsham and John
Churchill, vol. 1. London.
Jupp, Dranr B., and Ketiy, Kennetu L.
1939. Method of designating colors. Journ. Research Nat. Bur. Stand.,
vol. 23.
Loturop, SAMUEL K.
1942. The Sigua: southernmost Aztec outpost. Proc. 8th Amer. Scien.
Cong., vol. 2. Washington.
1950. Archaeology of southern Veraguas, Panama. Peabody Mus. Amer.
Archaeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ., Mem. vol. 9, No. 3.
Pinart, ALPHONSE L.
1885. Chiriqui. Bocas del Toro. Bull. Soc. Geogr. France, septieme serie,
tome 6. Paris.
Santo THoMAS, ADRIAN DE.
1950. Conversion of Guaymi and Darién and its Indians. Ed. and trans.
by E. B. Adams and Doris Stone. Jn ‘‘Archaeology of southern
Veraguas, Panama,” by 8. K. Lothrop, appendix 2, pp. 96-103.
SHEPARD, ANNA O.
1956. Ceramics for the archaeologist. Carnegie Inst. Washington,
Publ. 609.
Wassin, Henry.
1949. Contributions to Cuna ethnography: Some archaeological observa-
tions from Boquete, Chiriquf, Panamdé. Etnologiska Studier
No. 16, Etnografiska Mus., Goteborg, Sweden.
Anthrop-,PaP- ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 279
EXPLANATION OF PLATES
PLATE 28
a-t, Characterized by gray to black core with margins varying from weak yel-
lowish orange to moderate orange. Moderate coarse temper.
a, Punctate bowl, smooth rim. Eroded granular orange exterior. Smooth
buff interior. See figure 18, b.
b, Punctate with incising. Smooth buff interior. 1.5 em. thick. Figure 18, g.
c, Punctate with incising. Smooth interior. Exterior eroded and granular.
1.0 em. thick. See figure 18, 7.
d-f, h, i, Punctate and incised. Exterior and interior smooth orange. 0.6
—1 cm. thick.
g, Punctate and incised, with boss. 1 cm. thick.
j, Buff core and surfaces. Interior and exterior smooth with indented fillet
applied just below rim. 0.7 cm. thick.
k, Gray core, buff surfaces. Smooth exterior. Interior of rim combed. 1.0
em. thick. See figure 18, h.
l, Buff core and surfaces. Smoothinterior. Mediumtemper. Modeled octopus
applique design. 0.8 em. thick.
m, Light buff slip with fine line red painting. Finely ground temper. 0.5 cm. thick.
n, Very coarse buff ware. Interior granular. Fishtail applique design on ex-
terior. 2.0 cm. thick.
o, Smooth light buff interior, red painted lip. See figure 18, k.
PLATE 29
a, Large rim sherd with applique porpoises. Brownish-black core, orange
margins. Interior and rim, well-polished orange. Exterior shows very fine
marks of smoothing implement, perhaps cornhusk or other similar leaf. Coarse
to very coarse temper. 1.2 cm. thick. See figure 18, a.
b, Brownish-black core, buff margins. Polished buff interior and rim. Exterior,
slightly rough, blackened by carbon. Coarse temper.
c, Black core, buff margins. Smooth buff interior and lip. Exterior, slightly
rough. Medium temper. Lip painted red and remnants of red painted
designs on exterior and interior. 11cm. thick. See figure 18, 7.
d, Black core, moderate orange to buff margins. Medium temper. Smooth
light buff exterior and interior. Rim painted red, extending 2.5 cm. down
exterior. 1.1 cm. thick. See figure 18, f.
e, Brownish black core, buff margins. Medium temper. Smooth light buff
interior and exterior. Rim painted red. Exterior blackened by carbon. 1.1
cm. thick. See figure 18, n.
f, 80 percent brownish black core, orange to buff margins. Coarse temper.
Smooth orange interior and exterior. Rectangular openings had been cut
below rim. 2.0—2.5 em. thick.
g, 90 percent brownish-black core and outer surface, 10 percent inner surface buff.
Very coarse, heavily tempered. Granular interior. Exterior combed. 1.5
em. thick.
h, Brownish-black core, buff exterior. Medium temper. Interior smooth and
exterior slightly roughened.
i, Light buff, medium temper. Smooth exterior and interior. Interior shows
narrow parallel ridges made by rubbing stone. 1.5 cm. thick.
j, Brownish-black core, buff margins, coarse temper. Smooth light buff interior
and exterior. Red-painted rim. 1.2 cm. thick. See figure 18, m.
k, Black core, buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff interior and exterior.
Inside of lip painted red. 0.5-0.8 cm. thick. See figure 18, J.
280 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 30
a, Tripod vessel. Black core, buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff ex-
terior and interior. Completely coated with white dust from the limestone
cave. Four groups of red perpendicular lines on the interior of rim. 0.5 cm.
thick.
b, Tripod vessel. Some parts of bowl burned 100 percent buff, others black
core and buff margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff interior. Most of ex-
terior blackened by carbon. Body roughened by horizontal striating. Legs
are smooth and decorated with horizontal red line painting. Modeled animal
figure seated on top one leg. Three perpendicular slots in leg. 0.7 em. thick.
c, Subglobular bowl. Black core, buff margins and surfaces. Fine temper.
Exterior and interior rough.
d, Subglobular bowl. Black core and margins. Fine temper. Smooth buff
interior and exterior.
Puate 31
a, Polished dark buff. Fine temper. Exterior and interior smooth. Edge of
rim painted red. Red perpendicular line decoration on interior of rim. Strap
handle shows finger marks where attached. 0.6 cm. thick. See figure 21, e.
b, Combed buff exterior. Smooth carbonized interior. Medium temper. Small
nodes on the shoulder. 0.8 cm. thick.
c, Buff. Coarse temper. Smooth exterior. Interior pitted. Rim painted red.
Strap handle. 0.7 cm. thick. See figure 21, f.
d, Buff weathered brown. Medium temper. Interior and exterior smooth.
0.6 cm. thick. See figure 21, g.
e, Buff. Fine temper. Polished interior. Carbonized exterior has roughened
zone below the rim, decorated with incised lines connecting hemispherical
nodes. Another roughened area runs around center of bowl. Edge of rim
painted dark red. See figure 21, a.
f, Bowl with slotted pedestal base. Black core, dark buff margins. Fine temper.
Base and interior of bowl, polished dark buff. Deep red slip on exterior of
bowl. 0.6 cm. thick. See figure 19.
g, Buff paste. Medium temper. Exterior smooth but pitted by erosion. In-
terior eroded. Rolled everted rim, loop handle. See figure 21, b.
PLATE 32
a, Flat base. Dark buff weathered brown. Fine temper. Exterior and in-
terior smooth. 0.7 cm. thick.
b, Neck of small jar. Thin dark buff partially carbonized. Fine temper.
Interior smooth. Exterior, two parallel fillets decorated with crude incising.
0.6 cm. thick.
c, Buff paste. Medium temper. Buff interior, partially painted red. Exterior,
red on buff, with lunate punctations between double incised lines. 0.5 em.
thick.
d, Interior and exterior, polished dark buff weathered brown. Fine temper.
Raised design.
e, Exterior, polished buff painted with red line designs. Smooth, unpainted
buff interior. Medium temper.
f, Black core with buff margins. Medium temper. Polished buff interior
decorated with painted red vertical lines. Lip smooth and painted red. Ex-
terior slightly rough.
g, Smooth brown interior. Combed exterior, brown blackened with carbon.
ano ot > ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 281
h, Slightly roughened buff exterior. Red painted lip and red vertical lines on
polished buff interior. Fine temper. 0.7 em. thick.
1, Wide black core and buff margins. Fine temper. Polished buff interior.
Exterior rough and carbonized. Red lip.
PLATE 33
a, Brown carbonized. Medium temper. Polished interior. Smooth exterior
pitted by erosion. See figure 21, 7.
b, Polished dark buff interior and exterior. Medium temper. See figure 21, d.
c, Fragment of handle, frying pan incensario. Black core, buff margins. Fine
temper. Well-polished buff exterior with one red transverse line. Red paint
along edges. Under side, smooth buff. 1.5 cm. thick.
d, Concave vessel support, beveled supporting edge roughened. Smooth buff
with red paint on exterior.
e, Polished brown interior and exterior. Medium temper. Surface eroded and
carbonzied. See figure 21, 7.
f, Polished buff interior and body exterior. Lip of rim painted red. Exterior
of rim roughened. Medium temper. See figure 21, h.
PLaTE 34
a, Wide black core, narrow buff margins. Mediumtemper. Exterior, roughened
buff. Interior, smooth buff. Considerable limestone dust deposited on sur-
face. Lip painted red. Vertical ridges around middle. Indentations around
collar. 0.8 cm. thick. See figure 22, a.
b, Dark buff. Medium temper. Carbonized exterior shows marks of smoothing
implement. Interior smooth. 0.7 cm. See figure 22, e.
c, Smooth dark buff interior, red painted lip. Exterior carbonized and slightly
roughed. Medium temper. 0.7 cm. thick. See figure 22, b.
d, Polished dark buff interior decorated with six red stripes. Redlip. Exterior
badly eroded but apparently had vertical ridges around middle similar to (a).
Medium temper. lcm. thick. See figures 20, e; 23.
e, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted outflaring lip. 0.8
em. thick. See figure 22, k.
f, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted beveled lip. Medium
temper. 1.38cm. thick. See figure 22, m.
g, Dark buff. Smooth interior and exterior. Red painted beveled lip. 1.3
em. thick. See figure 20, a.
PuaTE 35
Large vessels with high collars.
a, Dark buff polished interior, exterior roughened. Medium temper. Lip
painted red. Applique octopus design. 1.3 cm. thick. See figure 22, d.
b, Dark buff polished interior. Exterior combed. Medium temper. 0.9 ecm.
thick. See figure 22, f.
c, Buff, exterior of collar combed. Deep groove where collar joins body. Ex-
terior of body smooth. Interior and lip of vessel smooth. Collar 12.4 cm.
high. See figure 22, c.
d, Collar and body of vessel combed buff. Smooth zone at point where collar
joins body is polished brown. Interior is buff with black firing cloud. Medium
temper. 0.7 cm.
e, Black core, buff margins. Medium temper. Polished brown interior. Ex-
terior combed. 1 cm. thick.
f, Very thick black core, narrow buff margins. Combed buff exterior. Lip
and interior smooth. Lip painted red. Coarse temper. 0.8 cm. thick.
282 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 36
Exterior of sherds shown in plate 37.
a, Buff, carbonized on exterior. Deep incised groove sets off base of collar from
body. Exterior shows marks of smoothing implement, such as cornhusk.
b, Buff, carbonized on exterior. Curving convex collar. See plate 30, d.
c, Carbonized buff ware, red lip. See figure 22, o.
d, Buff interior and exterior, fine temper. See figure 20, g.
e, Rough buff exterior, coarse paste. Red lip. See figure 22, j.
f, Exterior rough, carbonized. See figure 20, h.
g, Rough buff exterior. Red lip.
h, Rough buff exterior. Deep incised groove separating collar from body. See
figure 22, g.
i, Rough buff exterior. Deep incised groove separating collar from body.
Coarse temper. See figure 22, h.
j, Rough buff exterior. Red lip. Deep incised groove separating collar from
body. Coarse temper.
k, Rough exterior, carbonized. Red lip. Coarse temper. See figure 22, 7.
PLATE 37
Interior of sherds shown in plate 36.
a, Smooth buff with beveled rim on interior. Lip painted red.
b, Same as (a).
c, Polished buff.
d, Smooth buff, fine temper.
e, Smooth buff pitted by erosion.
f, Carbonized, smooth buff.
g, Smooth buff with red lip and broad red vertical lines painted on interior.
h, Polished buff, beveled rim.
7, Polished buff.
j, Smooth buff. Red lip.
k, Carbonized surface. Smooth buff, beveled rim.
PLATE 38
a—d, Conch spires with circular hole in center.
e, Limestone chisel.
f, Red jasper polishing stone.
g, Polished celt of blue slate.
PLATE 39
a, Gray core and buff margins. Fine, sparsely tempered. Dusky yellowish
orange (SYR6/6) interior and exterior. Smooth exterior, rough interior. Ap-
plique animal figure. 0.7 cm. thick.
b, Black core, buff margins. Coarse, medium tempered. Exterior, buff with
splotches of orange. Fine regular combing, with band of extremely fine comb-
ing extending 2.5 em. below lip. Polished orange interior with fine parallel
ridges indicating use of rubbing stone. See figure 24, a.
c, Dark buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Dark buff, smooth exterior and
interior of neck. Everted rim. Interior of body rough. See figure 24, e.
d, Buff paste, fine tempered. Exterior of body, buff blackened by carbon, rough.
Rim smooth and splotched with orange. Polished orange interior. Small
buff areas are interspersed with the orange. This may be thin clay wash
which has fired orange. See figure 24, d.
Ano 21> ARCHEOLOGY, ALMIRANTE BAY, PANAMA—STIRLING 283
e, Orange paste, medium temper. Smooth orange interior. Exterior decorated
with punctate bosses.
f, 90 percent brownish black core, 10 percent buff on interior and exterior. Coarse,
moderate temper. Exterior combed, buff, with applique design. Interior,
granular, pitted, buff. 2.2 em. thick.
g, Orange paste. Very coarse, heavily tempered. Smooth orange interior and
exterior. Loop handle.
h, Buff, coarse moderate temper. Combed buff exterior. Granular buff interior.
1, Buff fired orange and brownish black near rim. Coarse, moderate temper.
Smooth interior. Exterior, smooth area 3.5 cm. below lip. Fine combing
below this area. 1.5 cm. thick. See figure 24, b.
j, Buff paste, coarse, moderate temper. Smooth buff exterior and interior.
Applique octopus design.
k, Same as (j) except that buff exterior is roughly combed.
l, Paste black, with buff on surfaces. Coarse, heavily tempered. Surface,
badly eroded. Applique octopus design.
PLatE 40
a, Buff paste and surfaces. Medium temper. Smooth exterior with grooved
indentations outlining rim, 1.3 cm. from lip. Red paint on exterior of rim.
Interior of body deeply combed or impressed. See figure 24, c.
b, Same as (a). See figure 24, f.
c, Brownish black core, buff surfaces. Medium temper. Smooth interior.
Exterior has regular combing similar to plate 39, b, 7. See figure 24, g.
d, Gray core, buff exterior and interior. Fine, sparsely tempered. Smooth buff
exterior and interior. Fire cloud on interior. See figure 24, 7.
e, Light buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Rough, buff interior. Polished
buff exterior with bold dusky red and narrow black, parallel lines. 0.7 cm.
thick.
f, Buff paste. Fine, sparsely tempered. Flakes of mica on polished buff in-
terior. Rim and interior painted red. Exterior, smooth buff.
g, Buff paste. Coarse, heavily tempered. Smooth orange exterior painted red.
Interior eroded, granular.
h, Buff paste. Medium temper. Exterior combed. Interior of rim smooth.
1, Buff paste. Mediumtemper. Smoothsurfaces. Solid vessel support or heavy
handle.
j, k, Gray core, buff margins. Very fine temper, micaceous particles visible on
surface. Smooth buff interior and exterior.
l, Buff. Fine temper. Interior smooth. Exterior rough.
PuatTE 41
a-b, Female figure of Costa Rican type from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay.
ce, Metate found on Cricamola River, photographed in town of Bocas del Toro.
d, Metate from Bastimentos Key.
PLATE 42
a, One of the midden mounds on Darkland Point. This is the mound from
which comes the Boc-1 material.
b, Two of four large mortars hollowed from unshaped stones on Darkland Point.
682—611—64_—_23
984 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 43
a—b, Rings of limestone from the offshore island, Escudo de Veraguas, which was
formerly a sacred place where the Guaymi made pilgrimages and held cere-
monies. Engler collection. a, 8 cm. in diameter; b, 16.5 em. in diameter.
c—e, Stone celts from Jungle Point.
f, Limestone pestle from Jungle Point.
g—n, Stone celts and celt fragments from cave site Boc-2. k is 10 cm. long.
PuatTe 44
a, Head from jaguar effigy metate found in burial cave, Boc-2.
b, Head from jaguar effigy metate found on Valiente peninsula. Engler coll.
c, Double-bitted ax (Engler coll.) found near Almirante. This specimen is of
the same material and the same size as one of two found by us in a tomb at
Barriles, Chiriqui.
d-e, Double-bitted axes from Barriles, Chiriquf.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 28
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1.
(For explanation ,see p. 279.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 29
4 IN.
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 1.
(For explanation, see p. 279.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 30
es a oe 10) OM.
a ee eee
Tripod vessels and subglobular bowls from Bocas del Toro, site 2
(For explanation, see p. 280.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see p. 280.)
31
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 32
a el eed 10 CM.
a ee
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see pp. 280-281.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE
10 CM.
4 IN.
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see p. 281.)
33
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 34
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see p. 281.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE
Se eT
Se
Large vessels with high collars from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see p. 281.)
35
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE
ee OL
ee 4
Ceramic ware exteriors from Bocas del Toro, site 2
(For explanation, see p. 282.)
36
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 37
Interiors of sherds shown in plate 36.
(For explanation, see p. 282.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 38
J
CM.
Nonceramic artifacts from Bocas del Toro, site 2.
(For explanation, see p. 282.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 39
4 IN.
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3.
(For explanation, see pp. 282-283.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 40
Ceramic ware from Bocas del Toro, site 3.
(For explanation, see p. 283.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 41
Stone female figure from Cocos Island, Almirante Bay; stone metates from Cricamola River
and Bastimentos Key.
(For explanation, see p. 283.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 42
Midden mound and mortars, Darkland Point.
(For explanation, see p. 283.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 43
m
Stone artifacts from Escudo Island, Jungle Point, and Darkland Cave.
(For explanation, see p. 284.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 44
Jaguar heads and double-bitted axes.
(For explanation, see p. 284.)
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 73
THE ARCHEOLOGY OF TABOGA, URABA, AND
TABOGUILLA ISLANDS, PANAMA
By MATTHEW W. ann MARION STIRLING
285
682-611—64——-24
MOMTUTTTaNY VAIMOAW EEE
¢ qgotomdsS nisiwines, Wo mooie ;
AOE nitallyil rea ‘i
och
EY 0. tage Ienigoloqeniiak "i .
GA AGARU .ADOUAT TO YOOIOMHOAA SHG
AMAVIAT POVA0el ALAUDOMAT
OALIAITE VOLEAN ana Wo WARTTPAM vit
We SPRL ae | FR AES Fe ee | a ee ee SS |
a
Bee
CONTENTS
(Maboea Malan titted fadna sm, of bilee Feces vente ote af ile Bt ak a
LILES Go 4; ee |S anes ea Oe eae een Oe RSE eA FTN Ba » DC en Tene
reli oneteme| ovonstew ys cot6 (N=) oy 2) | ORM aaa oe aree wey Uo ee a ay Caner Icy eu Wee
GG erpearunh Ca 5 oh a ee EY rye AIS ie Np Be Pe al
ECOL Mein s cb 2! Wy etait Gaara OMe Ue en ONO os ae een eer
[SY ofr tie SAS AER es ode ged Meee bos PbS LS Oo St, Severe Mee ee eS Le Om Bnei ORO eel we
TRAN COR Sanaa aa Ne 9 Wis IEEE ies WR Aes A ORNs! ene, Bt Speen We
Teele =: 5 a open mies, ere 11 | ears ud Mner eects opera SEs ene Sane Seam Ato
DOS Ae =.) dl el ae at ee eh ety Bah Bie te BOR
Og crSRU ESET \0 Sean enaeiee miele ROY LESS TTY ry 2M Aes OS ura ees We ene eens Oa er one
Tabopuilla islands 249. - sh Vette Ps yeh ba fice wpe ae ak
Papozuila—1 and: Paboguilla-24v 232) oe. pee ee hee ee ee eet
Ceramics: < 25.4 2 eh yond lV hea ASB Ag 2 tty
Mimigeaisirns © = Sbypea sh a oop py S gt og Sh he Bees ee ed Ne, at
indented! a. 2h os Se aii D ere Oia ee eet ed a en
Applique:.c220 ts Be FAS sah. bee ogee fast hs Fhe el
Ve Naya 0 leiceQeyetscs IR rec] te Peed eee ps aoe Coe Pees TO Ren See oe ge Se
PabOriilla-B.. 52. = SE a nee tah sce pe ee eet lee, Beek 8
IRETETEMCeSiCILEC Sane. ee ee i Oe Oe Opes Eee
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
(All plates follow page 348)
45. Rim sherds from large vessels; Taboga-1.
46. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1.
47. Painted sherds; Taboga-1.
48. Various zoned designs; Taboga-1.
49. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1.
50. Pedestal and ring bases; Taboga-—1.
51. Taboga stonework.
52. Taboga and Taboguilla stone and shell.
53. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-—4.
54. Rim sherds; Taboga-—4.
55. Urabd urns.
56. Urabdé urns.
287
288 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATES—Continued
57. Sites on Urabd and Taboguilla Islands.
58. Bold incising; Taboguilla—1.
59. Combing and incising; Taboguilla—1.
60. Incised ware; Taboguilla—1.
61. Various rim decorations; Taboguilla-—1.
62. Narrow line combing; Taboguilla—1.
63. Combed ware; Taboguilla—1.
64. Fragments of globular bowls decorated with combed designs; Taboguilla—1.
65. Multiple line combing; Taboguilla—1.
66. Scallop impressions; Taboguilla—1.
67. Filleting on combed surface; Taboguilla—1.
68. Filleted ware; Taboguilla—1.
69. Subglobular bowls with scallop indented filleting; Taboguilla—1.
70. Collanders; Taboguilla—1.
71. Sherds with bossed decorations; Taboguilla—1.
72. Broad flat rims of subglobular bowls; Taboguilla—1.
73. Subglobular bowls with strap handles; Taboguilla—1.
74. Rim sherds of flat shallow plates; Taboguilla—1.
75. Interior of rim sherds shown on plate 74.
76. Micellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla—1.
77. Black-on-orange-and-black outlined with white-on-orange; Taboguilla—1.
78. Black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowl sherds; Taboguilla—1.
79. Reverse of plate 78.
80. Pedestal base bowl sherds.
81. Sherds from black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowls; Taboguilla-—1.
82. Miscellaneous black-on-white-and-orange sherds; Taboguilla—1.
83. Miscellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla-1.
84. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—3 rock shelter.
85. Filleted and scallop impressed ware; Taboguilla—2.
86. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—2.
87. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—2.
88. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—1.
89. Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—1.
90. Taboguilla—3; rock shelter site on Taboguilla.
TEXT FIGURES
PAGE
25) Rim profiles; “Vabepa-i_ = 2220 2 ees ee ae ee ee eee 300
26; Rim profiles: Taboga—l_... 2. 2222.-252232222. 12-225) eee 301
27, Rim profiles of red painted ware; Taboga-1___22_22-_ == 2-22 22 es 302
28. Rim profiles from Jarge vessels; Taboga=1-22="=_ == 222" vias eee 303
29. Rim: profiles: Tabaga—le- .. 323-2 222325 seen ek eee ae 304
50;; Rim, profiless Tabogea-l.2 =. 524-255" 50 oe eee eee 305
$1: Rim protiles; Tabora=-32.- = seu =2442 9224 eee 309
32. Small pots with miniature saucers from Urabé_____-.-------------- 311
33. Taboguilla rims proiles] 222403 soc ta oe eee eee ae ae 313
34: Tabopuslia rim profiles.) 2222. 2a se ees See eee 314
35; Restored: Taboguilla bull, ware jars 65-22-25. 5-- el 2 eee 315
36. Restored Taboguilla, buff ware jar_.-.=.-2-.2 2-222-222-2522 316
37: Restored Taboruills ceramic bowl...2-+--.-222225 2225-22 42 eee 317
Antnrop,, P| TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 289
TEXT FIGURES—Continued
PAGE
DoT ebeMOriOl (HEUTE OM) ee eee eo ee ee ee 318
39. Restored Taboguilla orange-and-white bowl______________________- 319
20 ivestored Laboruillayimeised jars222224 225320502452 kk seca 319
Al nestored Tabopguilla meised jar. .- =) 2.222422 eee oko 320
a hestored Caboguilla incised jars 222 2 oh a eee eee 321
25; eucstoreu abomuilla meised gar 22202. et a8 ee ee 322
Aa i aDOr tills anced BHeTOs=: See. (ssw eet mee Nee ee eo ne 323
45. Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting_____ 324
46. Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting_ ____ 325
47. Restored Taboguilla incised jar with applique crescents_____________ 326
48. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl____._.____.._......-.__-_-- 328
49. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl_______.___._._____-_____-- 329
50. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bow]___________._..._-_-___-__- 350
51. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl_______________.___.-_____- 331
52. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bow]_____..._.__......_._-_-_-- 332
53. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl__._.___.__.______-_-._-______ 333
54. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl__________.___._.-.____-__- 334
55. Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl___.____._.._.._.__._-___-_-- 335
=: DEL BUR oe. eee a se suerte
Oe. oe Wainer ad, } pometrta eta lion
Be lei Chath pen :
ORE 94h Layo Vplaictyt lien! ae Be
¥
pastry 7
. aiid we aes
fain eo eM LU an st oy a yo Teh frelon al
be eo fesalsat a
ORL Ro ua aay Boe ha
SOG Nyita kee as Resi, 9) ae
ph: nl gino Gnehardotlass dst tnt viv Wise effi bata te
Le an n
eee ee fa viens Lapibtten ay th: ieationt, niu)
‘tact wind Tateating RE riod
OBS ?
he Pewee hadat ladashog atitewache’l Aaa
Iwod sand lajmrhoq pile! it pre
Pilid Sedat Lieb hor ah veya
..lword send latealhon alficuodall Bee
CRR PORE gmat gine loygad Adhd Tateobed alliireda hd
Se TAS ee te vase. SORT vied Tntaibie atliniodsa'T Bt
PPS Fit BIph Area eh ald Lt quihing nltigoaes,
od
Can PAE Mer NGS) | An
Coe apie 0, Porte ests
YU gtk: y 2s gohan oe
Sis Futeetenenioe jet a ye Nin aise
» se + ee as --
ix 4 a" Ml ivan (pea ' 4 be
‘ ‘
i]
] j i
:
1p! ‘ ial
Pile ~
‘i
ii f {
/
J ‘ iia ¢@* bee
r Lad ah wed
, tee | ia td at.
with) T Cros | aa a.
» bial ae Ps dvightier otitis TH 4 Tyee :
Lita A ADea/eaet sa, am Oh raf aideel
AL Alri rales ve IN ye ame es
My Peaiensii repaid bill kee jt uae 2 ee ee Ae
i. 3” Par 4 avirriiltiv bynaid., yer hes oe oe es, tee
BV ieecpht Tle wath dans Se a Ce ? er
; aid
7 ;
‘1 aon ie
PREFACE
The archeological investigations on Taboga, Uraba, and Taboguilla
Islands were conducted in March and April of 1953 as part of the
archeological program in Panama under the auspices of the Smith-
sonian Institution and the National Geographic Society.
Accompanying the expedition as photographer, and assisting gen-
erally in the work throughout the entire sequence of expeditions to
Panama, was Richard H. Stewart, assistant chief of the Photographic
Laboratory of the National Geographic Society.
We are indebted to a number of friends both in the Republic of
Panama and the Canal Zone for making our work easier and more
efficient. Mr. Karl Curtis, longtime resident of the Canal Zone, gave
unstintingly of his time and knowledge of Panamanian archeological
sites. Mr. and Mrs. Paul A. Bentz kindly allowed us to use the large
basement of their home in Balboa for the storage of our specimens
and asa work laboratory. Above all, we are obligated to Dr. Alejandro
Méndez, director of the Museo Nacional de Panama, for his cordial
cooperation and assistance during all of our archeological investiga-
tions in Panama. Others, too numerous to mention, gave us assist-
ance in many ways and contributed to making our stay in Panama a
very pleasant one.
We are grateful to Mr. Edward G. Schumacher, artist for the
Bureau of American Ethnology, for the line drawings in this report.
291
el a ea eal 7 oe ¥ Y 1 eg ee
4 i
a ; . a “ 7? finn ‘ ad B als = iva oa,
de Mt a ae
tet yf , ., ; Ot J e le i: ‘, a nail oe a
' on Wi ee bias
WOATIND
allisraodal bie. Ade) «egodeT ao vcottenitenral lesigale
ods To tong en FG00 to lingé hee dow ut baisabad
“ime alt Jo aiqede-d) thao aca) fT qaliony, Rae
‘aie? giikerse40 lnneitinY edt bas vowed i
-062 giitefern hia tarigamelidq. ef conibsaye ah) peri
Ghenoiihagqus. to souaryne sulin 412 lvodgucyl) shqwipm } 3
wiaumentedd odd lo Wide taaeletn Quawste 1 bindenl basil u
voor! wilqeresd) Lacoitei eht Wee
ly tabdgeds Srit at od abasit Io atin w of batdebab peer
dro foe tikes Pyow wo aniAam a one tons’) okt fiete
orem occu basta) adi 14 dood onthe ita) aay ui)
in sate jnideitaay'l To auhalvrous bun simi et lee
ewiel od) sucofau bavolly vibsisl iF 4 luwt is hee ee
To vests wate 270 ty oogiole ald 26) nodal io eoonl vod lo hayes
ihuaiith nT 6) hadjavidd eqauw navedaA cy1otectodal ieee if :
' ig
fattriass meet jar Amano ah LAnoinAy. casually Aad 16 soiovitn «oh
vw" Paha 7
buiiasy on “esiugioadoim nue io ff! TLD oot aiews 000 TORR
“isieea BU BYRD Warton Hour oo anil eee at
meted of Yo tio or ) DY NNO Dae By Ww Ye ire
yi it in aagehge "w)
(tt 20} decd tadininiuds wwhS «Moot Ibtenw eee L
ek io Aid mh. wouiwaity ant Lp “Oto! rahi hia ti whens len
ine
THE ARCHEOLOGY OF TABOGA, URABA, AND
TABOGUILLA ISLANDS, PANAMA
By Marrurw W. and Marton Stririine
INTRODUCTION
The islands of Taboga, Urab4, and Taboguilla lie in the Gulf of
Panama some 12 miles from the Pacific entrance to the Panama
Canal. All three are relatively steep mountain peaks which project
above the waters of the gulf and, as a consequence, there is a minimum
of level ground on them. Urab& and Taboguilla lack fresh water
during the dry season, and as a result have at the present time no
permanent inhabitants. Urab4 is small and rocky and has very little
cultivable ground. Taboguilla is larger and has a considerable area
suitable for cultivation and some springs which furnish enough water
for drinking purposes for all but 2 months of the year. At the present
time there are three or four small houses on Taboguilla which are
occupied temporarily by families from Taboga who have plantations
on the island.
TABOGA ISLAND
Taboga, about 2 miles in length and 1 mile in width, is the largest
of the three islands and the only one with permanent habitations.
There is an ample supply of water and a small but good harbor with
good anchorage. It is a very attractive place and now is famed as
a pleasure resort.
The area of the Bay of Panama extending from Taboga to the Pearl
Islands is one of the world’s finest fishing grounds, a fact no doubt
exploited by the aboriginal inhabitants. In fact, the name ‘“‘Panama’’
refers to the abundance of fish. Fishing now is the principal industry
of Taboga as it probably was in pre-Columbian times. Judging from
the nature of the archeological sites, the aborigines made considerable
use of the shellfish which occur in abundance and considerable variety.
The principal species used was Aequipecten circularis Sowerby, which
constitutes probably one-half of the total shell content of the midden
deposits.
293
294. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Because of the lack of suitable anchorages along the mainland
of the Isthmus, and because good water was not readily available
there, Taboga early became a key point for the trans-Isthmian traffic.
Balboa scarcely had reached the Pacific before Taboga began a colorful
history matched by few spots of equal size in the New World.
The principal stream of water on Taboga flows through the only
relatively level area on the island, that lying immediately back of
the cove and beach. The present village occupies this area on both
sides of the stream, the houses being built about as close together
as possible. Since this is the only logical living site on the island,
it was here also that the principal aboriginal settlement was located.
Under the present village lie the remains of the old colonial Spanish
town, and below that the midden deposits of the Indians. A cross
section of this deposit is exposed where the ramp from the beach as-
cends to the first narrow street on the village level. The church
appears to be built over approximately the middle of the Indian
village site. While this site would be naturally the most productive
location for archeological research, it is impracticable to dig in it
because of the buildings which cover it. At the present time the
surface of the ground under and around the houses is littered with a
mixture of Spanish and Indian sherds.
Information concerning the Indians inhabiting Taboga at the time
of the Conquest is almost nonexistent. Because of the early settle-
ment of the island by the Spaniards and its limited area, it is probable
that the bulk of the natives were killed or driven away early in the
16th century.
After raiding Parita and the Azuero Peninsula in 1515, Badajoz
and his surviving followers fled to Chamé and thence to Taboga
Island, being the first Europeans to land there. After nursing their
wounds for several weeks in the security of the island, they returned
to the mainland. Beyond the fact that the island received its name
from Taboga, the chief who resided there, and that the Spaniards
obtained 22,000 pesos of gold from the natives, we learn nothing from
the early chronicles. It is probably safe to assume, however, that
Badajoz obtained the gold by force and that his visit virtually brought
to an end the aboriginal occupation of the island.
In 1519 Pedrarias, then Governor of Panama, after taking posses-
sion of the south coast, brought his force of 400 men to Taboga, from
whence he established the old City of Panama. It is to be presumed
that the Spaniards already had a settlement on the island, for in
November of 1524 Pizarro sailed from Taboga on his epoch-making
voyage of discovery which led to the conquest of Peru.
In 1545, Pedro de Hinojosa, dispatched by Pizarro to capture
Panama and place it under his control, outfitted and repaired his ships
Anthrop. Pap. K
"No. 73] — +‘TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 295
at Taboga from whence he conducted his negotiations with the govern-
ing officials on the mainland. During all of this time there is no
mention of Indians on the island.
In 1575 Dr. Alonso Criado de Castilla stated that “Five leagues
from the City of Panama was the island of Otoque, and three leagues
from Panama was the island of Taboga; both tilled and cultivated by
some inhabitants of Panama who planted and harvested corn.”
This would seem to indicate that the aboriginal population had been
replaced in the main by mestizos and Spaniards.
In 1610, in reply to queries sent out by the Spanish Crown, the
following item is of interest:
The districts about Panama formerly had many pueblos of Indians, but only
three remained. That of Chepo was eight leagues to the east . . . . Chepo had
40 Indian inhabitants, ruled by their own governor, constable, and two mandadores.
On Isla del Rey [in the Pearl Islands] to the east, 18 leagues from Panama and 6
leagues from Tierra Firma was another pueblo which usually contained 500 Indians
but then only 12. The third village of natives was on Isla Taboya [Taboga] 4
leagues south of the City with but 12 inhabitants, who were very poor like those
of del Rey. None of these Indians paid tribute, and all spoke the Spanish lan-
guage, having entirely forgotten their own. [Anderson, 1938, p. 281.]
Reference to this pathetic remnant is the last contemporary men-
tion of the Taboga natives. It is certain that the Indians had no
part in the hectic events that took place on and about Taboga during
the next two centuries when it was a key point in the activities of
the buccaneers and other freebooters who roamed the South Sea and
repeatedly burned and sacked the town, which was always promptly
rebuilt on the same spot beside the clear stream which here flows
into the cove.
In 1671, when Morgan sacked Old Panama, the Spanish refugees
fled by boat to Taboga and Taboguilla. It was not long after this
that Captain Searles was sent to capture the Spanish treasure ship
Trinity; he captured it at Taboga. The ship was poorly equipped for
defense, but Taboga was stored with “several sorts of rich wines”
with which Searles’ men “plentifully debauched themselves.” By
the time they had sobered up, the Trinity had escaped.
Hven as late as 1819 Captain Illingsworth and his group of Chileans
landed on Taboga, where they looted and burned the village.
A number of early descriptions of the island have been left us by
the more literate of the buccaneers. That of Capt. William Dampier,
written in 1685, would serve very well to describe the Island today:
The 24th day we run over to the Island Tabago. Tabago is in the Bay, and
about 6 Leagues South of Panama. It is about 3 mile long, and 2 broad, a high
mountainous Island. On the north side it declines with a gentle descent to the
Sea. The Land by the Sea is of a black Mold and deep; but towards the top
of the Mountain it is strong and dry. The North side of this Island makes a
296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
very pleasant shew, it seems to be a Garden of Fruit inclosed with many high
trees; the chiefest Fruits are Plantains and Bonano’s. They thrive very well
from the foot to the middle of it; but those near the top are but small, as wanting
moisture. Close by the Sea there are many Coco-Nut-Trees, which make a
very pleasant sight. Within the Coco-Nut-Trees there grow many Mammet
(Mamé) Trees.... The S.W. end of the island hath never been cleared, but
is full of Firewood, and Trees of divers sorts. There is a very fine small Brook
of fresh Water, that springs out of the side of the Mountain, and gliding through
the Grove of Fruit trees, falls into the Sea onthe North side. There was a small
Town standing by the Sea, with a Church at one end, but now the biggest part
of it is destroyed by the Privateers. 'The buccaneers under Sawkins lay here
from May 2-15, 1680.[!] There is good anchoring right against the Town, about
a mile from the shoar, where you may have 16 or 18 fathom Water, soft oazy
ground. ‘There is a small Island close by the N.W. end of this called Tabogilla
[actually Urabdé], with a small Channel to pass between. ‘There is another
woody Island about a mile on the N.E. side of Tabago, and a good Channel
between them: this Island [Taboguilla] hath no Name that ever I heard.
[Dampier, 1717.]
It is clear from the rather abundant literature concerning Taboga,
that from earliest times, together with Taboguilla and Otoque, it
was the vegetable garden and fruit orchard first for Old Panama,
and later to a lesser extent for the modern city.
It is interesting to note the apparent changes over the centuries
in the character of the crops raised. Jn 1575, the principal crop was
corn. In 1685 Dampier states that the chief crop was plantains and
bananas, but also mentions coconuts and mames. At the present
time the principal crops are pineapples and papayas, which are grown
in clearings on the steep hillsides. The pineapples of Taboga are
famous for their quality, and it is local tradition that the original
plantings for the Hawaiian Islands came from here.
The aboriginal occupants of Taboga were probably moderately
prosperous, since Badajoz looted them of a fairly substantial quantity
of gold. TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 315
vessel showed a considerable variation in shade (from reddish orange
to yellow orange) we considered grouping all such colors under orange.
However, definite oranges are found on interiors and exteriors of
painted sherds and in several instances red was applied on orange
as an intentional color contrast. We finally decided to retain the
distinction of red, orange, and buff, giving Munsell equivalents with
the realization that certain vessels show a considerable range in hue.
The only true reds are probably either the black on red type or those
instances where we have red on orange. Vessels showing a color
range, for example, are (pl. 71, a, c, d), which vary from dark tones,
Morocco Red (pl. 58) to Madder Brown (pl. 70), Brick Red (pl. 70),
Kaiser Brown (pl. 71), and Hay’s Russet (pl. 71). The lighter tones
are more common.
The oranges are Ferruginous (1 YR4.5/8), Vinaceous-Roufous
(10R4.5/9) (pl. 71), and Ochraceous Tawny (yellow orange) (pl. 72).
The light buffs are Cartridge Buff (pl. 87), Cream Buff (pl. 87),
and Light Buff (pl. 72).
oO fi 2 3
INCHES
0 8
le —
CM.
Figure 35.—Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar.
316 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
INCHES
CM.
Ficure 36.—Restored Taboguilla globular buff ware jar.
The browns are from Brown-Bay to Burnt Sienna (pl. 59), Mars
Orange and Liver Brown (pl. 71), and Sanford’s Brown and Hay’s
Russet.
The only other colors used were black and white. All possible
combinations of these three colors were used at one time or another.
Although there is no inflexible rule, the different color combinations
tend to correlate with particular vessel forms. A discussion of
decorative techniques follows.
PAINTED WARES
Trichrome.—The majority of the trichrome vessels were pedestal
base bowls.
(a) Black-on-white exterior, black-on-orange interior with the
orange overlapping the lip. A variant of this has a plain orange
interior.
Anthrop.,F@P- TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 317
Oo / 2 4
o \ INCHES 8
[—— — __
cM.
Figure 37.—Restored Taboguilla shallow buff ware bowl.
(b) Black-on-white interior, orange exterior. A variant has a
white-on-orange exterior.
(c) Black-on-orange interior and exterior with white on the base.
(d) Black, white and orange exterior, black-on-orange interior.
(e) Black, white and orange interior, orange exterior.
(f) Black-and-white-on-orange interior and exterior.
(g) Black-and-orange-on-buff. One collander had this decoration.
Bichrome.—These combinations usually were applied to high-
necked globular vessels.
(a) Black-on-white exterior.
(b) Black-on-orange exterior.
(c) Orange-on-white exterior.
(d) Black-on-red, interior or exterior.
Monochrome.—This ware is commonly in the form of globular pots
with outflaring rim.
(a) Plain orange, interior and exterior.
(b) Plain orange, exterior.
(c) Plain white, exterior.
INCISING
Bold incising.—This is a freehand technique where deep parallel
lines were formed, usually in curvilinear patterns.
Inght wmcising—This is a somewhat more delicate technique in
which parallel lines usually were applied to form a crosshatched
design.
682-—611—64——_26
318 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194
oO / 2 3
O INCHES 8
a ee
CM.
Ficure 38.—Interior of figure 37, restored, with black painted design.
Narrow line combing.—This name has been given to a style where
a comb with three or four tines was used to produce a special effect.
Bands produced in this way were vertical, horizontal, curvilinear,
crosshatched, or squiggled.
Multiple line combing—As the name implies, a sharp comb with
more teeth was used. The designs are less precise than in narrow
line combing. Perhaps to be considered a variation of this, is combing
with the edge of a pecten or scallop shell. This usually is applied
rather lightly and produces an effect similar to brushing, as the lines
are broad and shallow.
Am 3}? «= TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 319
INCHES
t¢) 8
————— __
CM.
Ficure 39,—Restored Taboguilla orange-and-white bowl; orange body, white shoulder,
orange interior and exterior lip.
INCHES
cM,
Ficure 40.—Restored Taboguilla jar with deep multiple line incising.
320 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
INCHES
fo) 8
=
CM.
Ficure 41.—Restored Taboguilla jar with deep multiple line incising.
Anthrop..t*P. TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 321
INCHES
CM.
Ficure 42.—Restored Taboguilla jar with deep multiple line incising.
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
322
INCHES
CM.
incising.
Ficure 43.—Restored Taboguilla jar with deep multiple line
Amo ya} > ~=©6TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 323
Figure’ 44.—Incised sherds from Taboguilla-1.
324 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
INDENTED
The most common method of indenting was to press with the edge
of a scallop shell. Indentations also were produced with a wedge-
shaped implement. Ordinary punctate designs, produced with the
point of a sharp instrument, are rare. Usually the punctations are
coarse.
(a) / 2 3
INCHES
oO 8
|
cM.
Figure 45.—Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting.
an 83} 2 TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 325
: ae
age
at ‘s
INCHES
ce] 8
eel
cM.
Ficure 46.—Restored Taboguilla buff ware jar with scallop indented filleting.
326 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
APPLIQUE
Filleting—Raised lines were applied horizontally, vertically, and in
curvilinear style. Frequently the fillets were plain; more often they
were decorated by indenting, either with a scallop shell or a wedge-
shaped implement.
Animal figures —Filleted designs occasionally were embellished
further with stylized figures of lizards (alligators) or frogs.
Bosses.—Hemispherical bosses were used rather frequently. Some-
times they were isolated or in pairs, sometimes placed close together
in parallel lines or in a haphazard fashion.
INCHES
cM.
Ficure 47.—Restored Taboguilla incised jar with applique crescents.
An ¥3} 2 TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 327
HANDLES
Loop handles were attached to subglobular bowls of plain red
ware. Some were flat, others round in cross section. The great
majority were placed horizontally, but there were a few vertical
examples.
PEDESTAL BASES
The most elaborately decorated vessels, as a rule, were the pedestal
base bowls. Instead of the regular sweeping upward curve usually
seen in Panama, the Taboguilla examples typically have a bulge in
the column between the base and the bowl. Some of the bases are
decorated by pressing with the edge of a scallop shell. Most are
scallop combed on the interior.
TRIPODS
There was a single specimen of a Chiriqui type tripod bowl of
brown ware. This was undoubtedly an imported piece, but is inter-
esting because of its association. It was well polished on the exterior
but rough on the inside. The body has a sharp shoulder decorated
with bosses, and the inside of the outflaring rim had been painted red.
The hollow supports had been broken off, so their form is conjectural.
STONE AND SHELL
Artifacts other than pottery were extremely scarce. Two small
celts of a hard fine-grained blue diorite are 7.5 cm. and 5.5 cm. in
length. Broad at one end, they are pointed at the other. They
are relatively thin and were shaped by a combination of flaking and
polishing (pl. 65, 8, c).
A third specimen of the same material is better finished, but its
original form is puzzling. Although the photograph does not show
this fact, it has a very sharp cutting edge at both ends, thus making
it unique. Since both sides are broken off, it may be that it is the
middle of an elongated implement with sharp sides (pl. 65, a).
A number of chips of yellow flint were scattered through the deposit,
but no knives or arrowheads were found (pl. 65, d).
A single massive polished shell cylinder was found. It is un-
perforated and probably was not intended as a bead (pl. 65, e).
An imitation jaguar canine of shell, perforated laterally, was found
in the nearby rock shelter (Taboguilla-3).
328 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
srrrtritiii
Ter
ORANGE
4
LEQ
onlag
INCHES
BLACK WHITE ORANGE
Ficure 48.—Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl with orange, black, and white
decoration. ), Interior of a.
Anon .f 2 TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 329
aT ODEDOLOTIOOTLEELE ee try 5.
LOA pgs
LLG,
OOOO MLL B=
cae OTTO LL OL LL fe
LILA kee
feat TaD OLED ESET LE:
OL i ASSIS EST oa
FG (FT sahiphaghrphapgha har,
A 227
—Srtvsglee
ae
chahaharbahate
INCHES
Oo 8
= ee eee
CM.
Ficure 49.—Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl with black and white decoration.
b, Interior of a.
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
330
(
af \
Wi
INCHES
CM.
Ficure 50.—Restored Taboguilla black and white decorated pedestal base bowl.
TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 331
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 73]
/
x 4
\
.) A
INCHES
cM,
Ficure 51.—Restored Taboguilla black and white decorated pedestal base bowl.
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
332
ra ae nee cme pT
INCHES
cM.
Ficure 52.—Restored Taboguilla black and white decorated pedestal base bowl.
TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 333
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 73]
ye.
\
7
Ny F
NY
A
\
N
| oe
A ;
N
INCHES
cM.
Ficure 53.—Restored Taboguilla black and white decorated pedestal base bowl.
27
682—611—64
[Bull. 191
O52D>
SOS
ORANGE
WHITE
INCHES
=
re)
ORANGE
WHITE
ith orange, black, and
SOSSCS
3
SESS
S35
SSS SOSOSSCS
SS SS
<5 SSC SOS
oS
SSSSSSS
TAL
white.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
<>
BLACK
illa pedestal base bowl decorated w
334
Ficure 54.—Restored Tabogu
a
TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 335
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 73]
SLL hippy,
\Lo
SLLELE Gg yy, ae
hh he
PT ih hhh tt he PE
sae Fea
SDE pag PPI
N
A
N
\
N
N
had
|
iy
INCHES
cM.
Ficure 55.—Restored Taboguilla pedestal base bowl decorated in€ black and white.
336 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
TABOGUILLA-3
Taboguilla-3 was a rock shelter which had been used for burial
purposes. Fragments of long bone shafts pertained to at least five
individuals. One was an infant, another a child, and the rest were
probably adults. Also present were two right maxillary and three
mandible fragments, an almost complete mandible and seven loose
teeth, a right mastoid process of an adult and another of a child. There
were two fragments of a skull vault.
The majority of the pottery consisted of sherds belonging to large
unpainted buff ollas. There were, however, a variety of decorated
sherds from smaller vessels.
Painting consisted of black-on-white, black-on-red, or plain red or
orange.
There was some incised ware and both plain and indented filleting.
One unique sherd indicated that the vessel had been wrapped with a
fiber string and then painted white, thus producing a negative design
where the cord had been (pl. 84, /).
As already stated, one of the two shell artifacts that we found on
Taboguilla consisted of the replica of a jaguar canine, perforated
laterally at the middle as though it had been one of a necklace of
similar objects (pl. 65, /).
REFERENCES CITED
ANDERSON, C. L. G.
1938. Old Panama and Castilla del Oro. New York.
DAMPIER, WILLIAM.
1717. A new voyage round the world, 1697-1709. London. (Ed. by
John Masefield and reprinted in “Dampier’s Voyages.” 2 vols.
London, 1906.)
Keren, A. Myra.
1958. Sea shells of tropical west America. Stanford Univ. Press.
Lorurop, 8. K.
1937. Coclé, an archaeological study of Central Panama. Cambridge.
Martyr, Peter.
1912. De Orbe Novo. Translated into English by Francis A. MacNutt.
New York.
OviEeDO, FERNANDEZ DE, and VALpf£s, GONZALO.
1851-55. Historia general y natural de Las Indias. Madrid.
RInGROSE, Basi.
1684. The dangerous voyage and bold attempts of Captain B. Sharp.
London.
Amo; 2 «6 TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 337
EXPLANATION OF PLATES
PLATE 45
Rim sherds from large vessels; Taboga-1
a, Smooth buff, grit tempered brown core; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
b, Smooth buff, grit tempered brown core; trench 1, 12—24 inches.
c, Smooth buff, grit tempered brown core; trench 1, general.
d, Buff slip on exterior and interior, red painted lip, grit tempered brown core;
trench 2, 0-12 inches.
e, Smooth buff, grit tempered buff core; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
f, Smooth buff, grit tempered buff core; trench 1, 12-24 inches.
g, Smooth buff, grit tempered buff core; trench 2, 12-24 inches.
h, Red-slipped exterior, grit tempered, reddish brown core; trench 1, 12—24 inches.
z, Plain buff, grit tempered light brown core; trench 1, 0-12 inches.
j, Buff-slipped interior, scallop combed neck, red-painted lip, grit tempered light
buff core; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
k, Slipped buff (or orange slipped ?), grit tempered, painted lip, buff core; trench
1, general.
1, Smooth buff, grit tempered, narrow gray core with buff margins; trench 2,
0-12 inches.
PLATE 46
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1
a, Exterior painted white on buff with red band under rim; interior red painted;
deep groove around lip; gray core, reddish brown margins; trench 1, 12-24
inches.
b, Interior slipped red, exterior smooth buff; paste fired buff on exterior margin,
interior margin gray; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
c, Same as b; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
d, White exterior, scallop combed neck; interior painted red, well polished, red
paint extends over the rim; core fired white; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
e, Light buff with splotches of pink; combed exterior with incised design, interior
smooth, core fired pinkish buff; trench 2, 24~—36 inches.
f, Red painted interior, paint extends over lip to form a band on rim exterior;
exterior polished buff; reddish brown core; hole drilled near rim; trench 1,
0-12 inches.
g, Red painted interior, exterior buff, smooth; reddish brown core; two holes
punched 11 mm. apart; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
h, Black-on-red with incised and punctate design; exterior painted red, interior
plain buff; three black lines painted vertically on rim; punctated zone, polished
buff; reddish brown core; trench 1.
z, Zoned red-on-buff; narrow zones slipped buff; interior unpainted, unslipped;
reddish brown core; trench 2, 24-36 inches.
j, Zoned red-on-buff with deep punctations; red zones smooth; brown core;
trench 2, 24-26 inches.
k, Orifice of bottle necked jar, plain buff, rough interior and exterior; flat lip
painted red; pinkish buff paste; trench 2, 24-36 inches.
l, Red painted interior, buff exterior; deep groove around lip; dark gray paste;
trench 2, 0-12 inches.
m, Zoned buff-on-red; narrow buff zones unpainted; exterior coated with carbon;
interior unslipped, unpainted; brown core; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
338 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 47
Painted sherds; Taboga-1
a, Red painted exterior, zoned areas in buff; vertical zoned area outlined by
two incised lines; top of zoned area not outlined; interior, buff, unslipped;
fine grit tempered buff core; trench 2, 12-24 inches.
b, Exterior, zoned red-and-black, interior red; deep groove around lip; brown
paste; trench 2, 12-24 inches.
c, Red painted rim, red slipped interior; exterior polished buff; brown paste;
trench 2, 24-36 inches.
d, Exterior buff-slipped with red painted design; interior, unslipped buff; gray
core with buff margins; trench 2, 24-36 inches.
e, Red slipped interior and exterior; fine black vertical lines (2 mm. wide) on
interior; reddish brown paste; trench 2, 12-24 inches.
f, Zoned red-and-white exterior, red interior; brown paste; trench 2, 12-24
inches.
g, Zoned black-on-white-on-red exterior; lip of rim painted white; two black
lines painted parallel to zoning incision on white; interior of neck painted red,
rest of interior unpainted, unslipped buff; exterior margin and core brownish
red.
h, Red slipped interior and exterior; elongate punctations inside of neck on
buff band, but not zoned with incising; buff paste; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
i, Zoned red-on-buff, buff surface slipped; interior, unslipped buff; buff paste;
trench 1, 12—24 inches.
j, Thin ware; zoned red-on-buff; narrow buff zones unpainted; interior unslipped
buff; reddish brown core; trench 1, 12—24 inches.
k, Red-on-white; interior slipped white 10YR 8/1, painted with red vertical
lines 5 mm. wide; interior of rim painted red; exterior, smooth buff; light
brown paste; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
l, Black-on-red-on-white; white 10YR 9/4 design, red triangle outlined in black;
lip painted red; interior unpainted, unslipped; brick red paste; trench 1, 24-
36 inches.
PLATE 48
Various zoned designs; Taboga—1
a, Zoned red-on-black-on-buff; from top to bottom the bands are red, black,
buff, black, buff; punctate zone, buff; interior rough buff; trench 1.
b, Well polished, zoned red-and-white exterior, interior red; deep groove in
lip; small nodule on rim; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
c, Red-on-buff; punctate zone buff, red area polished; interior, rough buff;
trench 1.
d, Zoned red-and-black-on-buff; from top to bottom the bands are red, black,
buff, black; elongated punctations in buff band; trench 1.
e, Red-on-buff; punctate zone unpolished buff, red area polished; interior red
and well smoothed; trench 1, 12-24 inches.
f, Zoned red-on-buff; from left to right the bands are buff, red, buff, red; the
ware is quite thin, 5 mm.; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
g, Zoned brown-on-red; it is possible that the zoned areas were originally black;
interior rough buff; end of zoned areas not closed; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
h, Zoned red-and-black-on-buff; from top to bottom the bands are black, buff,
black, red; the ware is quite thick, 14 mm.; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
Anrep; °°? TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 339
7, Zoned red-on-buff; the red zone is polished, the buff zones unpolished but
smooth; interior rough; trench 1, 24~36 inches.
j, Zoned brown-on-red, interior rough buff; the brown areas may once have been
black; this sherd was coated with carbon on the exterior; trench 1, 12-24 inches,
PLATE 49
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-1
a, Subglobular vessel with small orifice; smooth red painted exterior; rough un-
slipped interior; brown paste; trench 2, 12-24 inches, 10R 4/10.
b, Portion of large pedestal base; exterior zoned black-on-red, with punctated
buff zones; rim red, indented area buff; interior rough buff; buff paste; trench 2,
12—24 inches.
c, White interior and exterior; interior smooth, exterior combed; rim painted
red; white paste; trench 2, 24-36 inches.
d, Buff slipped interior and exterior; red painted lip; buff paste; trench 2, 24-36
inches.
e, Buff interior and exterior; exterior of neck rough, interior smooth; rim painted
red; buff paste; trench 2, 24-36 inches.
f, Subglobular buff jar with small orifice, incised and dentate design; buff paste;
hole drilled near the orifice; thin ware; trench 1.
g, Rough buff exterior, red painted interior with red paint extending over the
rim; brown paste; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
PLATE 50
Pedestal and ring bases; Taboga-1
a, Smooth red painted exterior, rough buff interior; black core with buff margins;
11 cm. high and 44 mm. in diameter; trench 1, 0-12 inches.
b, Black-and-white-on-orange; the broad dark bands are orange; the narrow bands
are black; rough interior; brown paste; 42 mm. in diameter; trench 2, 12—24
inches.
c, Smooth red painted exterior, rough interior; the interior of the bowl surmount-
ing the base was also red; reddish brown paste; 45 mm. in diameter; trench 1,
12-24 inches. .
d, Modified pedestal base; rough unpainted exterior and interior; base 22 mm.
high; buff paste; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
e, Modified pedestal base; rough buff interior and exterior; base 17 mm. high;
trench 1, 12—24 inches.
f, Flaring pedestal base; orange slipped, rather rough exterior, buff interior;
the interior of the bowl surmounting the base was painted red; gray core fired
orange on exterior margin; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
g, Modified pedestal base; plain buff exterior and interior; the interior of the bowl
was smooth and painted red; buff paste; base 25 mm. high; trench 1, 0-12
inches.
h, Modified pedestal base; rough buff exterior and interior; interior of bowl
smooth; 30 mm. high; buff paste; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
i, Ring base; buff slip interior and exterior; buff paste; 1 cm. high; trench 2,
Q—12 inches.
340 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 51
Taboga stonework
a, Crude ax of fine grained basalt; trench 1.
b, Polished ax of blue-gray rhyolite; trench 1, 0-12 inches.
c, Ax fragments of rhyolite; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
d, Ax fragments of rhyolite; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
e, Gray diorite ball; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
f, Bird effigy of tuff; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
g, Gray diorite ball; trench 1.
h, Crude diorite ax; trench 1, 24-36 inches.
i, Crude diorite ax; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
j, Flat, flaked disk of blue chert; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
PLATE 52
Taboga and Taboguilla stone and shell
a-c, Taboguilla—1; axes of blue rhyolite; a is unique in that it has a sharp
cutting edge on both ends; trench 2, 0—12 inches.
d, Taboguilla—1; sharp edged flake of rhyolite; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
e, Taboguilla—1; heavy solid shell cylinder.
f, Taboguilla—3; laterally perforated imitation jaguar canine of shell, these two
specimens (e and f) were the only shell artifacts found on either Taboga or
Taboguilla.
g, Taboga-1; small rhyolite celt; trench 2, 0-12 inches.
h, Taboga-1; arrowhead of yellow jasper; trench 2, 0-12 inches
t, Taboga-1; arrowhead of red and yellow jasper; trench 2, 12-24 inches.
j, Taboga-1; flake of yellow jasper; trench 2, 12—24 inches.
k, Taboga-1; incised sherd of Utivé type found back of the sandspit. This was
the only Utivé sherd found on the islands. It was not associated with a
particular site.
PLATE 53
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-4
a, Red slipped exterior, black on buff interior; fine grit temper; outside margin
of core black, inside margin light buff.
b, Red-and-black-on-buff; broad band outlined by buff is red, remainder of painted
design, black; grit tempered, core black; both margins buff.
c, Red slipped interior and exterior, black stripes on interior only, grit tempered,
light buff core.
d, Red-and-black-on-buff exterior only, interior unslipped; grit tempered, buff
core, gray margins.
e, Black-on-buff, exterior only; grit tempered, light buff core.
f, Red painted interior, lip and exterior buff except for broad groove under lip
which is red painted; fine grit temper; inner margin black, outer margin buff.
g, Black-and-red-on-buff exterior; interior buff, unslipped; fine grit tempered, light
buff core.
h, Exterior and interior painted red, lip black-on-buff; grit tempered, buff core.
t, Red painted exterior and interior, lip unpainted buff; grit tempered, buff core.
j, Red painted interior and exterior; black horizontal stripes on interior; grit
tempered, light reddish brown core.
k, Lamellar flake of yellow flint.
m3} 22 «6 TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 341
PLATE 54
Rim sherds; Taboga—4
a, Smooth red painted interior and exterior; uniform brownish red grit tempered
core.
b, Red painted lip, otherwise unpainted, unslipped; combed neck, uniform light
buff grit tempered core.
c, Smooth red painted interior and exterior; light brown grit tempered core.
d, Buff slip, combed neck; uniform light buff, grit tempered core.
e, Interior buff slipped, exterior unslipped; grit tempered light brown core.
f, Buff color, smooth interior, combed neck; uniform buff grit tempered core.
g, Orange slipped exterior, unslipped interior; uniform grit tempered buff core.
h, Red painted lip, buff slipped interior, combed neck; light buff grit tempered
core.
z, Same description as h.
j, Interior buff slipped, neck combed; grit tempered light brown core.
PLATE 55
Urabé urns
Large urns of buff or brick red ware, offerings in rock shelter burial on Urab4.
Not to scale. The vessels vary from 30 to 40 cm. in height.
PLATE 56
Urabaé urns
Large urns of buff or brick red ware, offerings in rock shelter burial on Urabd.
Not to scale. The vessels vary in height from 30 to 40 cm.
PLATE 57
a, Offertory in rock shelter on Urabd.
b, Site of Taboguilla—1, on Taboguilla Island, looking toward the mainland of
Panama.
PLATE 58
Bold incising
These vessels seem typically to have been of subglobular shape and rather large
with wide outflaring rim (see pl. 60, a). The incising is usually combined with
both horizontal and vertical scallop indented filleting.
The paste has a wide black core, with narrow dark buff or brown margins. It is
medium tempered. The exteriors were carelessly smoothed before incising.
Sometimes the surface was lightly combed, as in 6. The exteriors are un-
painted and slightly rough, often carbonized. Many retain the earth color of
grayish brown, as earth adheres to the slightly rough surface and is difficult
to remove. The inner surfaces are polished brown. Small particles of mica
show on the surface. The bases are generally polished.
PLATE 59
Combing and incising
a, Narrow line combing, scallop indented fillet around neck; plain buff ware.
b, Incised red.
342 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
c-f, i-k, m, Incised buff ware.
g, Buff incised exterior, red interior.
h, Exterior incised, buff and red; interior red.
l, Exterior incised red, interior buff.
Light horizontal combing on vessels before incising is apparent on a, e, f, k, l, m.
PLATE 60
Incised ware
a, Large olla rim, orange slip on lip and interior, vertical appliqued fillet with
scallop indentations; brown exterior.
b, Orange slip interior and exterior.
c, f, Thick unpainted light buff ware.
d, Thin light buff ware, orange lip; scallop indented fillet at base.
e, Orange exterior and interior.
g, Brown exterior, red lip and interior.
h, Orange interior and exterior.
z, 7, k, Unpainted buff ware.
PLATE 61
Various rim decorations
a, c-k, Red slipped ware.
a, c, d, f, i, Black on red paint.
b, Buff with rim painted red on interior.
k, Red on light buff.
l, m, Wavy combing over horizontal combing; brown ware.
PLATE 62
Narrow line combing
c, Pecten incised decoration near rim.
z, Globular bowl, red slipped interior and exterior, fire blackened; decorated
with two horizontal or concentric narrow line combed elements.
All of the remainder are unpainted buff ware jars with vertical narrow line combed
elements, some with additional raised applique ornaments. In some instances
the vertical combing is superimposed over lighter horizontal combing. On some
parts of sherds (a, c, f, h), the buff paste has fired red.
PLATE 63
Combed ware
a, b, e, Thick brown ware; unpainted with multiple line combing.
The remaining pieces show variations of narrow line combing techniques.
c, l, Brown ware.
d, g-k, Buff ware.
f, Red interior and exterior.
PLATE 64
Fragments of globular buwls decorated with combed designs
a, Globular bowl, orange slip inside and out, lower part blackened by firing; five
concentric two-line semicircles decorate side.
AnroPs, 7? TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 343
b, Globular bowl, orange slip inside and out, lower part blackened by firing;
decorated with three concentric narrow line combed semicircles.
c, Globular bowl, light buff slip outside with combed decoration; orange slip
inside.
d, Globular bowl, orange slip outside, combed decoration; inside plain buff; fire
blackened exterior.
e, Globular bowl, orange slip inside and out, exterior fire blackened; decorated
with three concentric narrow line combed semicircles.
f, Globular bowl, orange slipped interior and exterior; exterior fire blackened;
decorated with two double line combed concentric semicircles.
g, Globular bowls, orange slip inside and out; exterior fire blackened; decorated
with four double line combed concentric semicircles.
PLATE 65
Multiple line combing
a, Buff exterior; orange slip on interior.
b, Globular vessel with red slip exterior and interior.
c, f, Buff exterior, smooth black interior.
d, e, g, Buff interior and exterior.
h-k, Light buff interior and exterior.
PLATE 66
Scallop impressions
a, c, e, g, l, Unpainted light buff exterior with scallop impressions over light
combing; orange slip on interior.
b, d, k, Unpainted light buff interior and exterior; scallop impressions.
f, h, i, j, White on orange exterior, light buff interior; scallop impressions on the
white zone only. These are probably sherds of the bases of pedestal supports.
PLATE 67
Filleting on combed surface
Sherds of large unpainted ollas. Where the parallel fillets are notched, the
notching was done simultaneously with an edged tool.
a, Buff interior, brown exterior.
b-j, Light buff interior and exterior.
PLATE 68
Filleted ware
a, Applique lizard or alligator on large unpainted olla; notched filleting; light
buff interior and exterior.
b, h, 7, Buff interior and exterior.
e, Orange and buff exterior; interior red; combing and filleting.
f, Red exterior.
PLATE 69
Subglobular bowls with scallop indented filleting
a, Orange.
b-i, Red.
344 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 70
Collanders
The holes were punched from the outside to the inside while the clay was plastic.
In some instances the interior was permitted to remain rough; in others the
interiors were smoothed after the punching.
b, f, Side and bottom sherds from the same vessel, a straight sided jar with
outflaring rim and slightly rounded bottom; exterior painted black on white;
interior orange slipped; good quality ware.
g, The vessel was probably similar in form to f; exterior painted red on black;
bottom polished buff and the interior is orange over buff.
The remainder of the sherds are of unpainted buff ware. Several retain the gray
color of the soil which clings to the slightly rough surface and is difficult to
wash away.
PLATE 71
Sherds with bossed decorations
a, c, d, Sherds from subglobular bowl; red exterior and lip; buff interior with
horizontal combing; bossed decoration on exterior; horizontal strap handles,
round on outer surface, flat on the inside.
b, Unpainted buff ware, bosses appliqued on exterior.
e, f, Buff ware, combed surface with bosses.
g, Brown ware, combed shoulder with bosses, smooth base.
h, Red exterior and interior, bossed decoration.
i-k, Thin hard ware, orange slip inside and out, bosses on exterior.
Note: a, c, d, are all sherds from the same vessel, but each shows a different color.
The color was intended to be red but the handle section of a and the surface
of d were burned to a brown shade. a and c show a buff interior while, as a
result of less erosion, the interior of disred. This point is stressed to emphasize
the fact that color determinations do not always mean too much as variations
are brought about by several factors.
PLATE 72
Broad flat rims of subglobular bowls
These are all of a characteristic fine-grained hard paste of a light yellowish buff
color. Some have some combing on the interior and on or under the rims.
Sherds exhibiting this combination of form and ware are abundant and con-
stitute one of the diagnostic types of the site.
PLATE 73
Subglobular bowls with strap handles
The handles are usually horizontal; only one was vertical. All of this ware has
the same shape and rim form and all is orange slipped, fired to brown in some
places. Commonly it is decorated with scallop indented filleting (c, f).
PLATE 74
Rim sherds of flat shallow plates
The unincised portions of the rims and bases have an orange slip. The areas
with squiggled incising are buff. The ware is hard and the paste fine grained.
(See pl. 75 for interiors.)
An oPs} {P ~=TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 345
PLATE 75
Interior of rim sherds shown on plate 74
a, b, c,e, Black-on-red.
d, f, Black-on-white.
g, Red-and-black-on-buff.
PLATE 76
Miscellaneous painted sherds
a, White-on-orange exterior and interior; interior carbonized.
b, d, Orange-and-white exterior, buff interior.
c, Black and brick red on white interior, orange exterior.
e, f, h, Black-and-red-on-white exterior, buff interior.
g, Orange-and-white exterior, buff interior.
2, Red on light buff exterior, light buff interior.
1, Black, orange, and white exterior; buff interior.
PLATE 77
Black-on-orange-and-black outlined by white-on-orange
a, d, e, g, Unpainted buff interior.
b, f, Orange interior
c, Black-on-orange interior.
h, 1,7, The painting is repeated on both sides.
PLATE 78
Black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowl sherds
a, b, c, e, g, Black-on-orange interiors.
d, Unpainted buff interior globular bowl.
f, Plain orange exterior.
PLATE 79
Pedestal base bowl sherds (reverse of plate 78)
a, g, Black-on-white-and-orange exterior.
b,c, Black-on-yellow-orange exterior (possibly due to weathering?). In ¢ the
black paint is directly on the orange and outlines the white line. In other cases
the black is put on white as it has sometimes flaked off leaving white.
d, Black-on-white-and-orange globular bowl, exterior.
e, Black-on-orange exterior.
f. Black-on-white-and-orange interior.
PLATE 80
Pedestal base bowl sherds
Interiors, black-on-white pedestal base bowls with orange lips. All have
white slip on the exterior except d, which has an orange exterior.
PLATE 81
Sherds from black-and-white-on-orange globular bowls
a, c,d, f,j, Unpainted buff interior, black-on-white exterior.
1, Black-on-orange interior, black-and-white-on-orange exterior.
The remainder have orange interiors, with black-and-white-on-orange exteriors.
346 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
PLATE 82
Miscellaneous black-on-white-and-orange sherds
a, Orange lip, black on white design, exterior; interior, black on orange.
b-h, Black-on-white exterior.
i,j, Exterior unpainted combed buff area, orange painted lip and band; interior
orange.
PLATE 83
Miscellaneous painted sherds
a, Black, white, and orange interior, orange exterior; pedestal base ground down to
ring base.
b, Narrow neck jar, white slip.
c, Black, white, and red bowl, exterior; buff interior.
d, Black and white, part of pedestal base.
e, Black and white interior, orange exterior.
f, Rim of large olla; buff and brown exterior, red and brown interior.
g, Orange and white.
h, Large olla rim; red interior and exterior.
z, Shallow bowl, orange-on-white interior, white exterior.
7, Orange lip; black-on-white interior, white exterior.
PLATE 84
Miscellaneous sherds from rock shelter near Taboguilla—1
a, Crudely finished large olla, unpainted terra cotta.
b, Unpainted buff rim.
c, Incised, orange interior and exterior.
d, Black on white exterior, white interior, fine, hard paste.
e, Orange interior and exterior.
f, Black-and-white-on-buff exterior, buff interior. It appears as though the
vessel might have been wrapped with a string or fiber and the white paint
applied, thus producing a type of negative design by leaving narrow strips of
the buff surface unpainted.
g, Orange interior and exterior.
h, Incised, buff interior and exterior.
z, Orange interior, buff exterior.
j, Orange interior, exterior white with orange lip.
k, Black on red exterior, red interior.
l, Buff interior and exterior, punctate designs.
m, Orange exterior and interior, indented filleting.
n, Buff interior and exterior, plain filleting.
PLATE 85
Filleted and scallop impressed ware
a, c, Scallop indented filleting; orange inside and out; exterior c, burned black.
b, Punctate, buff unpainted pedestal support.
d-f, Plain filleting over brushed exterior; unpainted light buff.
g-j, Notched filleting over brushed unpainted exterior; h, orange interior;
other interiors unpainted.
k-l, Plain fillet; k, unpainted light buff, /, orange inside and out.
m, Scallop impressed, unpainted
Anthrop, Pap. TABOGA, URABA, TABOGUILLA ISLANDS—STIRLING 347
n-o, Unpainted, notched filleting.
p, Unpainted light buff scallop impressed shoulder.
PLATE 86
Miscellaneous sherds
a, Unpainted exterior, narrow line combing over horizontal combing, orange
slip interior.
b-c, Flat rim yellow buff bowl with combed or brushed exterior.
d, Orange rim with combing; interior unpainted.
e, Pedestal base, light buff smooth exterior, brushed interior.
f, Narrow line combing over brushed unpainted exterior; interior unpainted.
g, h, Broad line combed exterior; unpainted inside and out dark buff.
, Incised exterior, smooth interior; orange inside and out.
j, Unpainted squiggled lines (see pl. 74); interior orange.
k, Thin ware composite silhouette; incised exterior burned black; interior smooth,
buff.
>.
PLATE 87
Miscellaneous sherds
a, Black-on-orange, large rim with black triangle depending from lip on inside.
b-c, Black-on-red, inside and out, large rim.
d, Buff pedestal stand with slots; inside of bowl red.
e-f, Black-on-red bowl, inside orange.
g, Red lip, white on red exterior, inside red; plate rim.
h, Black-on-orange exterior; interior unpainted buff.
z, Buff collander.
j, Horizontal strap handle; unpainted buff.
k, Black-on-white bowl (the only black and white sherd from Taboguilla—2).
PLATE 88
Miscellaneous sherds
a, Light buff, unslipped, shell indented and incised.
b, Orange slip, indented.
c, Orange slip inside and over rim; incised section u slipped.
d, Combed and indented, unslipped light buff.
e, Orange slip on outside; the lower part where the coiling has separated is pecten
shell indented as though to make the coils adhere better.
f, Light buff, unslipped, roughly shell indented.
g, Orange slipped, interior dappled with small white spots like glaze.
h, Light buff, unslipped, incising over combing.
1, Orange slip, inside and over rim; vertical incising.
j, Light buff, unslipped, incising.
k, Light buff, unslipped, combing on interior, zoned incising exterior.
PLATE 89
Miscellaneous sherds
a, Orange slip, inside and out; vertical indented filleting on outside.
b, Orange slip, inside and rim (lip).
c, Orange slip inside; outside unslipped.
d, Orange slip inside and out.
348 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
e, Light buff, smooth, unslipped.
f, Light buff, smooth, unslipped.
g, Incised, light buff, smooth, unslipped.
h, Incised, light buff, smooth, unslipped.
zt, Zoned punctate, punctate, fillet light buff, unslipped.
j, Incised over combing, light buff, unslipped.
k, Punctate fillet, incised, unslipped light buff.
l, Incised and indented, orange slip.
m, Heavy incising, light buff, unslipped.
n, Indented fillet, light buff, unslipped.
o, Incising over combing, orange slip.
p, Herringbone incising, orange slip.
qg, Zoned incising, light buff, unslipped; mica abundant in temper.
r, Orange slip inside and out.
PLATE 90
a, b, Taboguilla-3. Rock shelter site on Taboguilla.
[Bull. 191
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 45
Rim sherds from large vessels; Taboga-l.
(For explanation, see p. 337.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 46
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-l.
(For explanation, see p. 337.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 47
Painted sherds; Taboga-—l.
(For explanation, see p. 338.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 48
2 IN.
Various zoned designs; Taboga-—l.
(For explanation, see pp. 338-339.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 49
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-l.
(For explanation, see p. 339.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 50
Pedestal and ring bases; ‘Taboga-—l.
(For explanation, see p. 339.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 51
Taboga stonework.
(For explanation, see p. 340.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 52
Taboga and Taboguilla stone and shell.
(For explanation, see p. 340.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 53
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboga-4.
(For explanation, see p. 340.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 54
Rim sherds; Taboga—4.
(For explanation, see p. 341.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 55
Uraba urns.
(For explanation, see p. 341.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 56
Uraba urns.
(For explanation, see p. 341.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 57
Sites on Uraba and Taboguilla Islands.
(For explanation, see p. 341.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 58
Bold incising; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 341.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 59
eee : 2IN, eS |
Combing and incising; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see pp. 341-342.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 60
Incised ware; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 342.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 61
Various rim decorations; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see p. 342.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 62
10 CM.
= 4 IN.
Narrow line combing; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation see p. 342.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 63
4 1N
Combed ware; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 342.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 64
Fragments of globular bowls decorated with combed designs; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see pp. 342-348.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 65
= 10 CM.
= : = 4 N:
Multiple line combing; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 343.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 66
10 GM.
4 IN.
Scallop impressions; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 343.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 67
;
I
4 IN.
Filleting on combed surface; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 343.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 68
7
Filleted ware; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 343.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 69
10 CM.
=o 74 N
Subglobular bowls with scallop indented filleting; Taboguilla-1,
(For explanation, see p. 343.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 70
10 CM.
= 4 IN.
Collanders; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 344.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 71
Sherds with bossed decorations; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 344.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 72
I
h aS
4 IN.
Broad flat rims of subglobular bowls; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see p. 344.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 73
10 CM.
4 1N.
Subglobular bowls with strap handles; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 344.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 74
4 IN.
Rim sherds of flat shallow plates; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see p. 344.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 75
10 CM.
4 IN,
Interior of rim sherds shown in plate 74.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 76
Miscellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 77
°
10 CM.
4 IN,
Black-on-orange-and-black outlined with white-on-orange; Taboguilla-1.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 78
41NS >
Black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowl sherds; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 79
Reverse of plate 78.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 80
Pedestal base bowl sherds.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 81
= i
OCM
= 14 iN. i
Sherds from black-and-white-on-orange pedestal base bowls; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 345.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 82
Miscellaneous black-on-white-and-orange sherds; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 346.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 83
Miscellaneous painted sherds; Taboguilla—1.
(For explanation, see p. 346.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 84
SCM.
21N.
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—3 rock shelter.
(For explanation, see p. 346.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 85
SCM.
- TN
Filleted and scallop impressed ware; Taboguilla—2.
(For explanation, see pp. 346-347.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 FLATE 86
Miscellaneous sherds; ‘Taboguilla—2.
(For explanation, see p. 347.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 87
SCM.
21
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—2.
(For explanation, see p. 347.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 88
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—l.
(For explanation, see p. 347.)
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 89
Miscellaneous sherds; Taboguilla—1.
For explanation, see pp. 347-348
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 90
Taboguilla—3; rock shelter site on Taboguilla.
(For explanation, see p. 348.)
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 191
Anthropological Papers, No. 74
TROQUOIS MASKS AND MASKMAKING AT ONONDAGA
By JEAN HENDRY
349
682—611—64——_28,
8
4s
divtlis, \bt dling
at) mn ee
Oy i ‘nape
—
7
=
CONTENTS
EELS UTVA S10) 2) Sees A Ne pe iT) ci ae ne RE MRS 2 ele 2
Paccerns Of art.in) Troquoisewlture. 222. 22 22 ee
Manke x kroquois Cultures cose. 2s) 2 ee i
PENG COOtIIUMI Lye em er eet eV Sisto oe SNe ee oe
pier Gary cteiee eee Joe Nae ee tS Sola la Abe
HCONOMICS OF MANK GATVANE. 2. 2-66 ek
Religious aspects of maskmaking. 22.0... 30000 oe ewe cc ee
earning ang metnvation eo.) sooo ITN ebay ee es
Technical’ and esthetic processes! {2-2}. 20 oc see een Sk
RECS OFiiniiue: Mes Pt oii 5 1a oat Wh henley Sa ek) Gb ee “Be
iar eR uEO IDES. e eed oto 21 ke i ee Be eS
LED CUTCLAR SCR a A SE Ee de en ane es Svan Ae NOUN POM se ea
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
(All plates follow page 410)
91. Onondaga Reservation Council House and Community center.
92. Onondaga Reservation maskmakers.
93. Onondaga Reservation residences.
94. Spoon-lipped masks.
95. Crooked-mouth mask and smiling masks.
96. Straight-lipped mask and crooked-mouth masks.
97. Blowing masks and smiling mask.
98. Blowing mask and straight-lipped masks.
99. Straight-lipped mask and crooked-mouth mask.
100. Crooked-mouth mask and tongue-protruding mask.
101. Crooked-mouth masks.
102. Onondaga 1888 DeCost Smith tongue-protruding masks.
103. Straight-lipped wooden mask and Husk Face Society mask.
104. Maskette carved by Allison Thomas.
351
- SpA
ivi 4
- it
j
y
J
aTAaTiod
eee os alee eee ' - S a Se ee ee ee a
cae bee wee sheer e ne wee ney ri sioner to
tay 5 ae eas Se ee
Ce en oe ee Wk Sin 2 pluie ee iee a a Ree
ea & = & > - ae ee ee Ciaa cannes AE OnE at a
POTN ee ae Des dais akin: ae a Selon s en Lae a a
jain Wah ad panera apubrunt) 383 2
es ile Aas Shek alien any Ne sian = Apia wees ten an GARE cone alt
DEN ape se. ae ie ae vn sn vel
At aes i eer es re ‘ani teem oe :
a 7 pall gaitensdenm to absorp
Py Ee eer | ee sip ee Se eas aoljevitous fee
On ws whoo sijotltes ting: ar itis
Ree tree Ae eo Fas Sad ae _ oo end te eae
pod Ue ae Se sabe eh ee ee - Aad teniet
nS ee i _— eee ee {jiee. pee tee
SAOTTAATS TIM
2 TTA PM lng | 7
OId ova aollo? myiniq WA)
weinss qinvouro) bag seu0ll [pine aolievrdeod ayabas 1 i
sweotentleen doilavweall apabno
smaobiset noitevimear ronbiol
ejenm hoqgil-a
eaean eciliwda ban dean idourbed
tasor dipor-hosnew ban dear hoqathidy
weno polline baa adadat abs
olaeds baquyil-tigians bad dese. gale
Moat fivoct-betloom bus Jazin Baqgiltdae
degen golbirstory-erranct baa dann (tiead-Domos
"panna ddvoorhwades
¢doam yaibution-sugaos tio teoe KAD ‘
daar ieee ooe dav tl bas deant aehoow boctatlesa
seacood Tl aodllA xd heviso aie
int
TROQUOIS MASKS AND MASKMAKING AT
ONONDAGA
By Jean Henpry
INTRODUCTION
Few features of Iroquois culture have aroused a more sustained
interest on the part of observers than the wooden masks or false faces.
From the middle of the 17th century, when these carvings first caught
the attention of the early travelers and missionaries, down to the
present day, masks and the rituals associated with them have been a
favorite topic of both amateur and professional ethnographers.
Systematic investigation began in 1880 with the work of De Cost
Smith and has been continued by William Beauchamp, Lewis Morgan,
Arthur C. Parker, Harriet Converse, and Joseph Keppler. These
students were primarily concerned with the role of masks in the
religious patterns of the culture, and while they have provided
abundant material on the mythological symbolism of the carvings
and their use as ceremonial properties by the medicine societies, they
tended to minimize or neglect other aspects.
The limitations of an approach solely in terms of religious function
have been overcome to a considerable extent by the contributions of
Frank Speck and William Fenton. Speck’s attention has been directed
toward the historical implications of masks. Through an analysis of
masking as a culture complex common to many Indian tribes of north-
eastern America, he has traced the distribution and probable course of
diffusion of masks in this region, thus placing the Iroquois materials
in geographical and historical perspective. Fenton’s treatment is,
to date, the most comprehensive. He includes a consideration of
the function of masks in the curative rites of the False Face Society,
the historical problems related to the rise and spread of the masking
complex, and is the first to approach the carvings from the stand-
point of art. In his monograph “Masked Medicine Societies of the
Troquois,”’ Fenton discusses the classification of formal types, the
relation of these types to mythology and ritual, and the possibility
of establishing local and tribal styles. He has also obtained infor-
353
354 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull, 191
mation on the technical processes of carving, the sources of formal
characteristics, and the role of the individual in devising new forms.
Although his most recent paper on masking presents some data on
these topics, much is as yet unpublished.
My study differs from previous investigations both in scope and
intention, as it is limited to an examination of mask carving on one
Iroquois reservation. The Onondaga Reservation was chosen be-
cause of its accessibility, and I began work with the assumption,
derived from the literature, that masks, insofar as they were still
made and used by the modern Iroquois, continued to serve the same
function and carry the same meaning as they had in the past.
Once I was in the field, however, the problem to be investigated
became more structured. Onondaga is situated on the outskirts of
Syracuse and is a highly acculturated community. Subjected to
continuous pressure from Western society for more than 300 years,
these Indians have lost many of their aboriginal customs and have
assimilated the technology and, in part, the social organization and
values of the dominant culture. In view of the widespread changes
which have occurred, two questions may be posed. What factors
account for the persistence of a traditional art in an acculturated
society? How have the changes which have taken place in the society
as a whole been reflected in the art—in its function, its meaning, and
its style? The answers to these questions are sought in an analysis of
mask carving in relation to its present sociocultural context.
Some limitations on conclusions which can be drawn from the data
are imposed by the nature of the problem and the lack of adequate
tools to cope with it. Artists are often unable, even when they are
willing, to verbalize their conceptions of art, since many of their
mental processes take place below the level of consciousness (Bunzel,
1929; Boas, 1955, p. 155). As yet no specific techniques for over-
coming this difficulty have been developed, so that full insight into
such problems as the motivation of the artist, the way in which he
develops or acquires his skill, and the particular kind of satisfactions
which he derives from his work remains beyond the scope of the
ethnographer.
The conditions under which I did fieldwork constitute another
factor which must be taken into consideration. I was on the reser-
vation for a little less than 2 months, a period of time insufficient
for me to become known and accepted by the community. Many of
the Onondagas are suspicious and somewhat hostile toward outsiders,
and the fact that I was a woman who was attempting to investigate
a man’s art did not improve my position. All my informants seemed
to find it strange and a little unseemly that a woman should be inter-
ested in woodcarving, which is undoubtedly one of the reasons why
Anton. 72?) IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 355
I was unable to persuade one of them to teach me the essentials of the
craft. Similar difficulties were encountered when I sought an oppor-
tunity to observe the technical processes of carving, although in this
case the principal obstacle was the lack of activity in maskmaking
during March and April, the months when I was at Onondaga.
In other respects, too, my position in the community was not ideal.
Because of the relatively crowded living conditions in most of the
homes and the general distrust of strangers, I had little freedom in my
choice of living quarters. The only family which was both able and
willing to take me in was Christian; the wife was White and the
husband, though Indian, quite thoroughly westernized. Their circle
of friends and acquaintances did not include Onondagas who continue
to make and use the masks since these people belong to the “pagan,”
less acculturated, portion of the population. I was, therefore, not able
to make contact with my informants on an informal, friendly basis,
or to converse with them casually in a variety of situations, but was
forced to seek them out with no previous introduction and depend on
one or two fairly structured interviews. Although I attempted to
secure roughly comparable data from each carver, I had little success
with the older men who were for the most part unwilling to talk to me.
The fact that I had no knowledge of the native language consti-
tuted another handicap. Though not necessary for communication,
it would have been an excellent means of establishing rapport.
Furthermore, insofar as conceptualizations about art are verbalized,
many of them may be phrased in Iroquois but not carried over into
English, which means that they are lost to the observer who has no
command of the native tongue.
I had hoped to obtain some information concerning the artistic
standards of the carvers by showing them photographs of masks
which have been made on the reservation during the last few years.
This plan was blocked by difficulties of an interpersonal sort since
after I had taken pictures of a group of Onondaga masks, the carver
who had originally given me permission to do so was told that under
no circumstances should he allow Whites to photograph them. He
asked me to refrain from mentioning to anyone that I had already
taken pictures, a request which obviously prevented me from showing
them to my other informants. However, I was able to use photo-
graphs of Iroquois masks which I had obtained from museums, and I
found them very effective as a means of eliciting the carvers’ jude-
ments and opinions about masks and as a rapport device. The mere
fact that I possessed such photographs seemed to change my in-
formants’ conception of me from that of a stranger who asked prying
questions to that of a person who had a genuine interest in masks and
who, perhaps, knew something about them. This technique also led
356 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
to more specific information, as it encouraged carvers to “free asso-
ciate’ about masks they had seen in the past, those they had made,
and the ceremonies in which they are used. Invariably the Indians
became more relaxed and talked more spontaneously after I had
brought out the pictures.
The data from Onondaga were gathered and written up in 1950-
51. Since that period, continued research has produced new eyvi-
dence on the origins and historical background of Iroquois culture
as a whole, and this has been incorporated in the monograph where
relevant. The principal findings about the function and meaning
of maskmaking on modern Onondaga, however, have not required
reformulation and have, if anything, been strengthened by recent
developments in other aspects of Iroquois life.
PATTERNS OF ART IN IROQUOIS CULTURE
Until recently the Iroquois Indians were believed to have made
their appearance in the northeastern portion of the United States
relatively late in the prehistoric period. At the time of their dis-
covery by Europeans, those known as the Five Tribes were settled
in the northern part of New York State where they occupied an in-
trusive cultural and linguistic position in an area inhabited by Al-
gonquian-speaking peoples. Certain elements in their culture
suggested a southern origin: a horticultural economy, matrilineal
clans, and a group religious system centered in an annual cycle of
harvest festivals, and theories of provenience postulated a migration
from the southeastern United States (Fenton, 1940 a, p. 164). Archeo-
logical evidence, however, has failed to demonstrate a migration route,
and excavations over the last several years indicate an Iroquois
development in situ from centers in southeastern Ontario and north-
western New York (Ritchie, 1961, pp. 30, 35). Indeed, the shamanis-
tic traits in their fraternities and secret societies point toward the
north.
The Iroquois lived in semipermanent villages of from four to five
hundred inhabitants. The characteristic dwelling, known as the
longhouse, was a large, rectangular, communal structure of poles
sheathed with bark. The decay of these bark houses and the ex-
haustion of the soil necessitated a removal to a new village site every
10 to 12 years. Horticulture was the primary source of subsistence
and was a cooperative enterprise carried on by the women. Corn,
beans, and squash were the staple crops and were personified in the
religious system as the three sisters who supported life. The men
assisted in clearing the fields and supplemented the diet by hunting
and fishing.
Am tat > «IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY she
The basic social unit was the matrilineal family headed by the
eldest woman or matron. These families were united into exogamous
clans which were not totemic although they bore animal names—
Bear, Wolf, Snipe, etc. Four clans constituted a phratry, and two
phratries, a tribe. Marriage was monogamous and arranged by the
matrons. Matrilocal residence, matrilineal descent and inheritance,
and the independent property rights of the wife gave women a status
equal or superior to that of men within the longhouse. Outside of
the home, women exercised an indirect influence in politics and
participated in most religious activities.
The political organization has been extolled by many western
observers as one of the most advanced in aboriginal America (Morgan,
1851; Wallace, 1946). It consisted of a league of five originally
autonomous tribes (Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and
Seneca) which were culturally distinct and spoke separate dialects.
At some time late in the 16th century these tribes banded together
in a confederacy for the preservation of peace and order. The or-
ganization they created reflected symbolically the structure of the
longhouse and the kinship system. The most powerful tribes were
accorded the status of ‘elder brothers” and were given special respon-
sibilities: the Mohawk guarded the “‘eastern door of the Longhouse,”’
the Seneca protected the western entrance, and the Onondaga living
in the center were the Keepers of the Council Fires and the perpetual
hosts for all meetings. The “‘younger brothers” were the Oneida,
the Cayuga, and later, the Tuscarora, a southern Jroquoian-speaking
people who joined the union in 1772. The League did not achieve
unanimity of purpose and action until the Colonial Period (Hunt,
1940), but did succeed even in its early phase in preventing warfare
among its members. Kinship ties helped to insure solidarity as clan
affiliations crosscut tribal lines.
The League’s constitution was based on a combination of myth and
historical fact and was transmitted orally from one generation to the
next. Authority was vested in 50 peace chiefs or sachems whose
actions as a governing body were at all times subject to the force of
public opinion. Although chieftainships were hereditary within par-
ticular families, the office was essentially elective. The matron, in
consultation with the other adult women of the household, selected a
candidate who was then confirmed by the clan council, the tribal
council, and finally the federal council. Women also had the power to
depose unworthy chiefs and sometimes acted as regents for those too
young to hold office. The federal council assembled once a year at
Onondaga to determine foreign policy, settle internal disagreements,
and act as the final court of appeals. The chiefs voted by tribes and a
unanimous decision was required. Oratory, which was highly esteemed
358 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
by the Iroquois, played a prominent part in these sessions and, along
with the games, feasts, and dances which always accompanied them,
made a council meeting a time of social and ceremonial, as well as
political, importance.
The central themes of Iroquois religion were fertility and health.
A pantheon of deities, headed by the Great Creator and representing
the beneficent and reproductive forces of nature, was opposed by the
evil spirits who brought disease and destruction to mankind. Fol-
lowing the harvesting of each of the principal crops, an annual
series of public ceremonies gave thanks to the deities through prayers,
songs, dances, and offerings of food. Tobacco was used in most rites
since it was a sacred plant, and smoking or burning it was regarded as
a pledge of sincerity. The Keepers of the Faith, an elected priest-
hood, were responsible for the preparation and conduct of these
celebrations, the most important of which was the Midwinter or New
Year’s Festival (also called the Feast of Dreams). Occurring in
February and lasting a week, New Year’s was a time of revelry when
people, often in masquerade, went from house to house, demanding
gifts and asking others to interpret their dreams. The carnival
spirit was combined with religious solemnity in the games between the
phratries, the dances, and the curative rites. The festivities culminated
in the burning of a white dog, the spirit of which ascended to heaven
carrying the prayers of the faithful to the Creator.!
A number of medicine societies, many of them secret, were dedi-
cated to the art of healing and the exorcism of evil spirits. Each
society propitiated a special class of supernatural beings and had
its own rituals and characteristic paraphernalia. The Bear Society
appeased the spirits of bears with offerings of tobacco; the Otter
Society drove out sickness, caused by water animals, by sprinkling its
patients with water; the False Faces cured with masked dances and
hot ashes rubbed or blown on the body; the Little Water Company
knew the songs and dances to revive the dying. Some societies
restricted their membership to those who fell sick and called upon
them or who dreamed of joining; others encouraged participation by
anyone who wished to help in the curing process.
Witchcraft was another source of evil and was punishable by death;
persons in positions of power, such as matrons and chiefs, were often
suspected. Witches were thought to roam about at night, sometimes
taking the form of animals and injuring their victims by charms or
mere volition.
The plastic and graphic arts of the Iroquois did not attain the
degree of complexity that was evident in other aspects of their cul-
1 At Onondaga the Burning of the White Dog has been obsolete for more than 70 years (Smith, 1888, p. 189).
Am ea? ~=IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 359
ture. A practical people with a talent for organization, they were
preoccupied with politics and diplomacy, and seem to have taken
a greater interest in these activities than in the development and
elaboration of material things.? Yet many Iroquois artifacts were
notable for their simplicity and vigor, and for the manner in which
form was adapted to function, whether domestic or ceremonial. In
the decorative arts, designs and techniques were similar to those of
the surrounding Algonquian tribes and were most probably derived
from them (Speck, 1925, pp. 1-12).
The Iroquois worked in a variety of materials. Pipes and mask-
ettes were carved in stone. Bone and antler were fashioned into
combs, beads, rattles, and small figurines. Although the maskettes
and figurines may have served as charms, their exact use is unknown;
the forms are angular and unrefined with little or no detail. Pottery
was made by the coiling process and was unpainted. The typical Iro-
quois pot had a globular body and a flaring collar ornamented only
with incised lines, although toward the end of the 16th century
there was a vogue for drawing crude faces at the corners of the rim.
In contrast to the sculpture in bone and stone, clay pipes were modeled
with naturalistic figures of men and animals; these effigy pipes have
been judged by one student to be the finest of their type north of
Mexico (Murdock, 1934, p. 300). Splints of black ash, bark, sweet-
grass, and cornhusks were made into baskets and other containers,
while braided or coiled cornhusks were used in the construction of
mats, dolls, and masks. Clothes were of animal skins embroidered
with geometric and curvilinear patterns worked in porcupine quills,
moose hair, grass, and shell beads. Quantities of shell beads
known as wampum went into the production of necklaces and belts.
The designs were of geometric motifs and highly stylized figures
which had a symbolic significance, for wampum was used as currency,
as a record of tribal events, as a pledge of good faith, and as personal
adornment.
Wood, being plentiful, accessible, and having sacred associations
for the Iroquois,’ was extensively used for tools, weapons, domestic
utensils, game implements, musical instruments, and ceremonial
properties. Although the majority of these objects were undecorated,
some were expertly carved with figures or geometric designs. Es-
pecially fine were the spoons and bowls which were the cherished
possessions of individuals who took them to the festivals for eating
2In Kroeber’s opinion there have been some Iroquois specializations in material culture but none of a
high order (1947, p. 92). Two other students believe the Iroquois were concerned with utility rather than
dramatic effect and consider their art to be less highly developed than that of the Algonquian (Douglas
and d’Harnoncourt, 1941, p. 154).
3’ The Sacred World Tree, symbol of peace and unity, figured prominently in Iroquois mythology and
ritual and was a frequent motif in their decorative arts (Parker, 1912).
360 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
the sacred food. The handles depicted men and animals, either
singly or in groups, and again a simple, abstract treatment of the
forms was characteristic. Carvings were sometimes painted in poly-
chrome, although for the most part the finish was that of the natural
wood.
With European contact beginning in 1615, the Iroquois entered
into a period of commercial and military expansion which brought
about far-reaching changes in their culture. As middlemen between
the colonists on the seaboard and the Indian tribes in the interior,
they came to dominate the fur trade. Firearms obtained from the
Dutch, and later from the English, enabled the League to develop the
most powerful fighting force in the northeast. By 1700 they had con-
quered all the surrounding tribes and, through war or diplomacy,
extended their influence from New England to Illinois and from the
Ottawa River to Tennessee. Taking an active part in the interco-
lonial wars, they fought unceasingly against the French and their
allies, the Canadian Algonquians, and were to a considerable extent
responsible for the triumph of the English on the American continent.‘
The constant warfare, the wholesale adoption of captives with the
consequent introduction of alien customs, and the close cooperation
with the English, all had repercussions on Iroquois society. The
economy shifted from horticulture to hunting, raiding, and commerce;
militarism increased and warriors gained in prestige and political
power; the efforts of missionaries began to undermine the aboriginal
religion; and European trade goods became an essential part of mate-
rial culture.
The effect of contact upon art was immediate and profound.
Manifold changes occurred in native materials, techniques, and de-
signs until, within a few generations, almost all Iroquois work showed
some European influence. Certain arts died out completely. Such
was the fate of pottery, which was soon made obsolete by the acquisi-
tion of metal containers. Work in stone and bone diminished and by
the 19th century much of the skill in the handicrafts had been lost.
The initial results of acculturation were not, however, wholly de-
structive. Some of the existing crafts were stimulated, at least for a
time, and in one instance a totally new skill, silversmithing, was
introduced.’ With metal tools obtained from the Whites, wood-
carving became easier. This craft reached its height in the 18th
century and some authorities do not date the figures on bowls and
spoons before that period (Beauchamp, 1905 a, p. 154). Better
4 The alliance of the Iroquois with the Dutch and the English has been termed ‘‘the pivotal fact of early
American History’? (Hunt, 1940, p. 6).
5 The introduction of trade goods had a similar effect on the arts of the Northwest Coast (Garfield, 1950,
p. 69). 3
eee rae: IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 361
tools and new materials—cloth, glass beads, yarns, and ribbons—
brought about a florescence in embroidery and the development of
new designs. Geometric motifs became less common, giving way to
elaborate and quasi-realistic floral patterns which indicate French
influence (Speck, 1945, p. 62). Silversmithing was acquired from the
Dutch in the 17th century and seems to have taken hold very quickly.
Crosses, brooches, bracelets, and rings were made by the Europeans
for the Indian trade and later by the Iroquois themselves. Form
and decoration resembled work of European origin, circles, diamonds,
hearts, and stars being the most popular designs. During the Co-
lonial Period there was a smith in almost every Iroquois village and
the craft flourished until the middle 1800’s.
The American Revolution marked the decline of the League and the
end of political independence. While the Iroquois were unable to
come to a unanimous decision as to which side to support, most of
the tribes fought on the side of the English, and at the close of the
war about two-thirds of the population fled to Canada. Those who
remained here were granted a portion of their original territory under
Government treaty, although these lands were subsequently reduced
by forced sales and the encroachments of White settlers. Today there
are approximately 7,000 Iroquois living on seven reservations in New
York State, and several thousand more, principally Oneidas, in
Wisconsin. The population, which had suffered heavily from the
wars as well as from alcohol and disease introduced by the Europeans,
has been steadily increasing during the last 100 years. Intermarriage
with the Whites began soon after contact, and it is estimated that the
United States Iroquois are now about 55 percent fullblooded (Doug-
las, 1931 a). The League, although greatly weakened and deprived
of many of its powers, continues to function and has undoubtedly
been a factor in allowing the Iroquois to preserve their tribal identity.
Acculturation has obliterated much of the aboriginal culture, but it
has taken place at a rate that has allowed them, as a society, to
adjust rather than disintegrate.
Although in many aspects of Iroquois life change has been resisted
and the old ways have been retained, the material culture has largely
succumbed to the pressure of western civilization. As a result, many
of the arts have lost their function in the society, and, in most in-
stances, when they have not disappeared completely, they have been
reduced to the production of curios and knickknacks for the tourist
trade. A number of the old artisans have died, and there is little
incentive in the younger generation to continue the traditional arts
or to institute new ones. An effort to remedy this situation was
undertaken in 1935 when the Indian Arts Project, sponsored by the
Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences, was established. Operating
362 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
as a relief measure under the Federal Government, the project was
carried on for 6 years on two New York reservations: Tonawanda and
Cattaraugus. With the help of the few craftsmen who still remembered
the old techniques, some of the Iroquois arts were revived: bead
weaving, quill embroidery, pottery, and woodcarving. This venture
has been moderately successful in reestablishing high standards of
workmanship and in providing an outlet for native products, but it
must be noted that the initial stimulus came from the outside, and
that, for the most part, the market is White rather than Indian.
MASKS IN IROQUOIS CULTURE
ORIGIN AND ANTIQUITY
While it is well established that woodcarving is a traditional
Iroquois art dating back to the prehistoric era, there has been con-
siderable disagreement among students as to whether the wooden
masks or false faces are an indigenous and ancient part of the culture.
Questions concerning the origin of false faces are but part of the
more general historical problem of determining the center of the
masking complex in the Eastern United States. According to Dall
(1884, p. 145) the use of masks by Indians east of the Mississippi was
rare and did not form a prominent part of their festivals or customs.
Although this statement is inaccurate, it is true that an uneven dis-
tribution of masks prevailed among the tribes of this region. Masks
have been recorded only for the Iroquois of New York, the Hurons
of southern Ontario and the extinct nations affiliated with them,
some of the Algonquian tribes of the Atlantic slope, the Iroquoian-
speaking peoples of North Carolina (the Cherokee), the Siouan
tribes of the southeast, and the Creek (Seminole). In view of this
distribution and the fact that the Iroquois appeared to occupy an
intrusive linguistic and cultural position in the northeast, Fenton
(1941, p. 416) originally suggested three possibilities: Iroquois
masking may be a diagnostic trait pointing to their alleged southern
origin; it may be related to northern shamanism and the use of masks
across the Arctic littoral; or it may have originated with the Iroquois
themselves. He postponed final judgment on this question, but was
inclined to believe that the Iroquois acquired their masks from the
north and that the immediate source was the Huron tribes.
Speck’s conclusions also are tentative and differ from those of
Fenton in that the former considers the Iroquois to have been the
agents of diffusion rather than the recipients. His opinion is based on
the distribution of masks in relation to the stationary wooden face
images which were common throughout the middle Atlantic Coast
region. Although the southern coastal Algonquians only had these
Anihrop. 7aP- IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 363
stationary faces carved on posts, and the northern Iroquois and the
Cherokee had only portable masks, the Delaware and related Algon-
quian peoples who lived adjacent to the Iroquois had both types of
images. Therefore, Speck (1945, pp. 74-76) concludes that in early
times: the tribes in the central sector of the eastern Algonquian
territory from the Hudson River to the Carolina Sound area
practiced certain rites connected with graven post images; the early
Iroquois performed rites with masks distinct from the usages of the
Algonquians; and the mask complex gradually spread to the nearby
Algonquian tribes who edopted it in addition to their own stationary
icons. Masks, then, were presumably an indigenous trait which the
Iroquois brought with them when they migrated into the northeast.
Historic depth, like origin, has been a subject of controversy,
and again two opinions prevail. Some believe that false faces were
used by the Iroquois before the contact period, while others date
their introduction late in the 17th century. The first historic record of
masks of the Iroquois type comes from the French Jesuits who observed
them among the Canadian Hurons in 1637, where they were worn in
dances to drive away pestilence and were hung on poles at the top of
each cabin when not in use. However, Jesuit accounts of similar
ceremonies at Onondaga at approximately the same time make no
mention of masks of any kind, and although the Onondaga were
apparently holding masked dances by 1676, there is no assurance that
the masks were of wood. The first positive evidence of false faces
among the New York Iroquois comes from De Nonville in 1687.
Writing about the Seneca he says, ‘‘They make some very hideous
masks with pieces of wood which they carve according to their
fancy . . . one foot and a half wide in proportion. Two pieces of
kettle very neatly fitted to it and pierced with small holes represent
the eyes. . .” (Beauchamp, 1905 a, p. 184). In 1743, this type
was seen at Onondaga and false faces were recorded after the
Revolutionary War as being numerous among all the Iroquois tribes.
The fact that the first travelers and missionaries found no public
use of masks, and for a long time knew of none among the Iroquois,
led Fenton (1941, pp. 412-416) and Beauchamp (1905 a, pp. 184-185)
to the conclusion that false faces and their rituals made their appear-
ance among the Seneca in western New York not earlier than the
middle of the 1600’s and from there spread slowly eastward to the
other four tribes. Those students who take issue with this theory
find support for the antiquity of masks in archeological materials.
Parker (1909, pp. 181-182) cites the small stone masks and the
faces on pots and pipes, some of which he takes to represent masked
figures. In his opinion, this evidence and some accounts of idols
in the early 1600’s that may refer to masks are proof that the Iroquois
364 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
masking complex can be dated before the period of White contact.
Converse and Keppler (Keppler, 1941, p. 19) take the same view and
point out that the failure of early writers to mention masks is no
guarantee that they did not exist at that time, as it is probable that
the first Europeans were never permitted to see a mask or to witness
the more secret ceremonies in which they were used.
The new archeological evidence bearing on the problem of Iroquois
provenience has done much to resolve previous differences of opinion.
The probability that Iroquois culture originated and developed in
New York State, and the discovery of representations of masked
faces on clay pipe bowls in prehistoric Iroquois sites near Onondaga,
offers support to those who insist that masking was an indigenous
and ancient trait.6 Fenton’s latest discussion (1956, p. 351) takes
these facts into account, and he is now in substantial agreement with
Speck, viewing the early Iroquois as a center for the development
of portable masks and as possible agents of diffusion to other areas.
Complete certainty on the question of origin and antiquity may
never be achieved. The climatic conditions of northern New York
prohibit the survival of direct evidence in the form of wooden masks,
and the reports of early European observers are equivocal in that
they are incomplete and open to different interpretations. Careful
historical reconstruction through research into the mask complex
as it exists today among the Iroquois and neighboring tribes is still
needed. If, for example, it could be demonstrated that the masks
and rituals of the northern Iroquois have more traits in common
with Iroquoian-speaking peoples to the south, the Cherokee, than they
have with those of the Algonquian peoples adjacent to them, it would
provide confirmation for the hypothesis that the Iroquois possessed
masks in the prehistoric period.
Regardless of what can or cannot be proved in the future, the fact
remains that masks have become deeply embedded in mythology and
ritual and can be fully documented as a significant part of Iroquois
culture for almost 300 years. Furthermore, the ‘idols’? mentioned
in the earliest accounts of travelers indicate that although the masks
themselves may not have been acquired until late in the 17th century,
the notion of representing supernatural beings in wood was neither
incompatible nor foreign to the Iroquois of the prehistoric era.’
6 Wray (1956, pp. 7-8) points out the resemblance between the stone and shell maskettes present in all
early Seneca sites and modern mask types.
In his journal of 1634-35, Arent van Curler reported that ‘the (Mohawk) chief showed me his idol; it
was a head with teeth sticking out; it was dressed in red cloth. Others have a snake, a turtle, a swan, a
crane, a pigeon or the like for their idol, to tell the fortune; they think they will always have good luck in
doing so.”” [Wilson, 1896, p. 88.]
Anthrop. Pap.
moet? IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 365
THE FALSE FACE SOCIETY
Although one of many religious organizations concerned with the
preservation of health, the False Face Society has always enjoyed
preeminence among the Iroquois, and on some reservations it is the
only medicine society which has persisted up to the present day.
Its particular function is the propitiation of the gods of Wind and
Disease, a class of evil spirits greatly feared for their power to send
plagues and pestilence among men. ‘These supernatural beings are
not named individually but are simply called False Faces; the Onon-
daga word is Hodo’wi, a term also used for those masks which repre-
sent the spirits. They are usually described as elusive creatures
who have neither bodies nor limbs, only hideous faces which paralyze
all who behold them. In ancient times they were occasionally
glimpsed by hunters in retired parts of the forest where they darted
from tree to tree, their long hair snapping in the wind. At Onondaga
they were said to live in a great cave where there were stone images
carved in their likeness and an atmosphere so charged with malign
influences that anyone who dared to enter was immediately stricken
with sickness (Smith, 1888, p. 187).
Of the several legends recounting the origin of the False Face
Society, that most generally known among the Iroquois concerns a
test of magical power between the Great Creator and the first Hodo’wi.®
Boasting that it was he who ruled the world, the Hodo’wi attempted
to prove his superior strength by summoning a distant mountain.
When he failed to accomplish this feat, the Creator caused the moun-
tain to stand directly behind the Hodo’wi and then commanded him
to turn around. Angrily doing so, the Hodo’wi struck his face
violently against a rocky ledge, breaking his nose and twisting his
mouth with pain. In punishment for his boastfulness he was forced
to suffer this distorted visage, and to help human beings combat
sickness and other evil influences. It was he who first instructed
men in the art of carving masks reminiscent of his own features and
taught them the ceremonies in which they are used. The Seneca
say he still lives on the rim of the world where he walks with great
strides, following the path of the sun. He carries a long staff and
a giant mud turtle rattle, and his face is red in the morning, black
in the afternoon (Fenton, 1941, p. 420).
Originally the False Faces were a true secret society. When the
members appeared in character they were always masked and their
names were known only to their leader, a woman who had charge of
the regalia. Initiation and exodus were by dreams. To fall sick and
8 This legend has been recorded by Parker, Keppler, and Fenton, and was repeated to me several times
at Onondaga,
682-611—64——_29
366 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
dream of the Hodo’wi indicated eligibility to be cured by the society.
This constituted initiation, and membership ceased only when one
dreamed of release.
The rise of Handsome Lake,® a preacher and prophet of the early
1800’s, brought about a period of suppression and persecution for all
the medicine societies. Claiming that they were working great harm
to men and animals, the prophet demanded that tobacco be thrown
into the fire and the companies disbanded. The chiefs met in council
and complied with his order, but because the tobacco ceremony was
omitted, many members of the societies declared the action of the
council illegal. Branded as witches, they continued to hold their
meetings in secret, and their very existence was concealed, both from
White investigators and the Indian converts to the new faith. How-
ever, as the religion of Handsome Lake spread and was accepted by
an increasing number of the Iroquois, it became more conservative.
Gradually the new beliefs blended with the old and the tabooed
societies were able to come out from underground. They began to
hold their rituals openly again and to enter into public ceremonies,
until eventually even the adherents of Handsome Lake joined without
qualms. It was about this time that the policy of the False Faces
toward membership underwent a change. Secrecy in regard to the
identity of members was no longer considered so essential and the
«mphasis on dreams as a prerequisite for initiation became less pro-
nounced. By 1900 on Onondaga, it was enough to show some symp-
toms of False Face sickness and make a feast (Smith, 1889, p. 279).
Typical symptoms included ailments of the shoulders, joints, and head,
especially toothaches, earaches, nosebleeds, and inflammation of the
eyes.
Although there are local variations in False Face rituals, the essen-
tial elements are common to all the Iroquois and have changed little
over the course of the years. They are best preserved among the
Seneca, to whom the other tribes tend to look for the correct forms.
In addition to holding private curing ceremonies, the False Faces
appear publicly three times during the year. In the spring and fall
they exorcise disease from the reservations, visiting the homes of all
believers, where they stir the fire, sprinkle or blow ashes on the inmates,
and dance. In return, they are given tobacco and corn mush which
they carry away with them in kettles. A good deal of levity may enter
into these proceedings as some of the band indulge in antics, rush
about the house, try to upset the stove, and in general cause havoc.
9 Handsome Lake was a Seneca who had come under the influence of Quaker missionaries and experienced
a series of revelations in which God instructed him to lead the Iroquois out of the degenerate condition into
which they had fallen. He preached against witchcraft, whiskey, and the wholesale acceptance of White
customs. His teachings are embodied in over a hundred moral injunctions, known as the Code of Hand-
some Lake, which are memorized and recited by religious leaders.
Anprop 722 IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 367
Besides the masks, they wear old, torn clothes which they sometimes
stuff with tin pans to make them more grotesque. Each member
carries a rattle of turtle, horn, or bark, while the leader, who is oc-
casionally disguised as a woman, has a giant turtle rattle and a long
staff to which miniature masks are attached. The third appearance of
the False Faces occurs during the New Year’s Festival, when they
petition the Hodo’wi to withdraw the sickness for which these spirits
have been responsible during the past year. Again they blow ashes,
dance to the accompaniment of rattles, and beg for tobacco. Several
False Faces, known as Doorkeepers, prevent anyone from leaving the
ceremonies, and those who refuse to dance are thrown down, rubbed
with ashes, and subjected to other indignities. Fenton has pointed
out that individual talent in dancing and acting constitutes much of
the effectiveness of these rituals. When an Iroquois dons a mask he
behaves as if he were the supernatural being which he represents,
acquiring its powers and dramatizing its attributes. He may even
come to believe that he is that being and while the phenomenon of
possession, a widespread psychological effect of masking, is probably
rare among the modern Iroquois, cases have occurred within the
memory of the present generation (Fenton, 1941, p. 422).
In ancient times carving was itself a religious ceremony sur-
rounded by rituals and taboos. Masks were hewn from the trunk of
a living tree in order that they, too, might be alive and contain the
spiritual qualities attributed to the World Tree, symbol of peace
and unity. Basswood was preferred because its fibers were ab-
sorbent and were considered to have remedial virtues. Having se-
lected a tree, the carver burned tobacco at its roots, related the legend
of the first False Face, and asked the tree for its life. The mask
was then outlined, the features roughly blocked out, and the piece
split away from the trunk. If the mask did not break and the bass-
wood remained unshaken, it was proof that the tree had acquiesced
to the appeal for its fe. Sexual continence on the part of the carvers
was necessary for a period both before and after the ceremony at which
no ritually unclean person was allowed to be present.
This method of carving has not been preserved by the modern
Iroquois and today the curative powers are imparted to the masks
after the technical processes have been completed. In a ceremony
called “doctoring,’”’ tobacco is burned, a bag of it is attached to
each mask, and the appropriate words are spoken over them. This
constitutes the initiation of the carvings into the False Face Society.
Once the masks have been initiated they have spiritual powers
that make them dangerous if they are not treated with great care and
respect. They do not like to be neglected, and unless they are used
frequently they must be talked to, fed mush, and annointed with sun-
368 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
flower oil. When they are put away it must be face downward, as to
be laid with the face up intimates that they are dead, which greatly
offends them. If masks are hung on the wall, they should be covered
or turned inward lest they cause possession. Some have special
powers to warn their owners of impending sickness or death, which
they do by sweating, falling from the wall, or speaking out; one old
Seneca mask was thought to be able to instruct newer masks and was
laid away with them for that purpose. Other false faces are noto-
riously bad tempered and hard to please. These are known as
“poison” and are a source of much trouble and anxiety to their owners
as they must be worn often and require a great deal of tobacco. To
mock any mask, to speak disrespectfully to it or of it, brings dire con-
sequences on the offender. I lness or a crooked face result and can be
cured only when the mask is used in a ceremony and propitiated with
an offering of tobacco.
STYLE
There is little stylistic relationship between the masks and the other
woodcarvings of the Iroquois. Whereas simplicity and restraint
are characteristic of the figures on bowls, spoons, and other objects,
the masks show an elaboration of form and a concern with detail that
sometimes tend toward the grotesque. Although this disparity in
style seems to place false faces outside the main traditions of Iroquois
art and could be attributed to the fact that they were acquired from
another culture, an equally plausible explanation lies in the relation
of form to function. As portraits of the powerful and dangerous
Hodo’wi, the masks must reflect the attributes of these beings, and so
it is not unnatural that they should have an emotional quality that
is absent from carvings which serve a less dramatic purpose.
Although differing in detail, all false faces share certain character-
istics which give them the same general effect and constitute a single
style. The carving is in high relief and the features, though dis-
tinctly human, are always distorted or exaggerated. ‘The eyes are
deeply set and rimmed with wide pieces of sheet metal, while the nose
is usually long with a high bridge and may be bent to one side. The
most variable feature is the mouth which may be twisted, puckered,
smiling, distended, or flaring; teeth or a protuding tongue are frequent
additions. Most masks have deeply cut wrinkles around the mouth
or eyes, and some have a crest of spines on the forehead or nose.
Horsehair, either black or white, is fastened at the top and hangs down
in long locks on each side of the face. As a rule, masks are painted
one solid color, either black or red. Occasionally, however, both red
and black will be used on a single false face, the coloration being
divided by a vertical line down the center of the mask.
AMO v4} » ~©=IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 369
A second variety of Iroquois masks not previously mentioned is the
husk faces which symbolize the three spirits of agriculture—corn,
beans, and squash—who taught men the art of cultivating. These
masks are by no means as numerous as the wooden type, since the
medicine society in which they are worn is almost extinct; a few,
however, are used for curative purposes in the False Face rituals.
Made of braided cornhusks, which are woven or sewn into crude
human faces with holes to represent the eyes and mouth, these masks
are quite flat and look somewhat like animated doormats. Other
masks that occasionally appear among the Iroquois are those depicting
animals—bears, pigs, and birds—which are carved in a naturalistic
fashion and may be survivals from ancient medicine societies, and a
buckskin mask with a long nose that is used to frighten disobedient
children. Maskettes in wood or cornhusk resemble their larger proto-
types to which they are often attached. They are also kept as personal
charms, used as tokens of membership in the society, and made for
children when they are cured by the False Faces.
The first attempts to classify the wooden masks were made in terms
of function with little regard as to how this might determine variations
in the forms or the treatment of details. Converse recorded a number
of types among the Seneca which were named according to use: Live,
Doctor, Wind, Scalp, Clan, Harvest, Maternity, Night, Completing,
and Counselor masks. This classification has been accepted by
Keppler, the friend and protege of Converse, but it has not been
substantiated by any other investigator. Morgan, Harrington,
Parker, and Fenton have found only four classes based on function:
Doctor, Doorkeeper, Beggar or Dancing, and Secret masks.!° Since
these students worked among the Seneca both before and after Con-
verse, it seems likely that she overinterpreted her material.
Formal characteristics as a basis for segregation were not seriously
considered until Fenton began his series of systematic studies among
the Seneca in 1936. Finding that the descriptions of collectors and
museum curators were at odds with one another as well as in disagree-
ment with the ideas held by the Indians themselves, he undertook
to group over a hundred masks according to certain formal criteria
and then checked this classification against the concepts of his in-
formants (Fenton, 1941, pp. 397-429). He discovered that the
mouth, which as the most variable feature is a likely base for dis-
tinguishing formal types, is the criterion most frequently used by the
Seneca who divide their masks into the following groups: crooked-
10 According to Fenton, Doctor and Doorkeeper masks are the most sacred and take the leading parts in
the curative rituals as they symbolize the first False Face. Those of the Beggar class represent the Common
Faces of the forest and are less powerful though they are also used for curing. Secret masks never appear in
public ceremonies; their function and symbolism are unknown.
370 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
mouth, hanging-mouth, straight-lipped, spoon-lipped, tongue-protrud-
ing, smiling, whistling or blowing, divided (red and black), and blind.
Combined with other features, mouth types constitute local and
tribal styles, ceremonial classes, and mythological stereotypes.
Crooked-mouth masks with a bent nose and many wrinkles are most
common among all the Iroquois and portray the distortions suffered
by the original False Face as described in the legend. Together
with spoon-lipped masks, which are generally confined to the Seneca,
they belong to the Doctor and Doorkeeper classes. Faces with a
protruding tongue appear most often among the Onondaga, whereas
those with a hanging mouth and a crest of spines on the forehead are
considered to be ‘‘classic Seneca.’”’ The Beggar or Dancing class is
the most plastic as it contains a variety of types. Smiling and whis-
tling masks fall into this group; among the Onondaga they are apt to
be heavy with thick lips and puffy cheeks. The divided masks that
represent a ‘‘god whose body is riven in twain” and who is half
human, half supernatural, are unfamiliar to most of the Iroquois, and
Fenton believes that they may have been acquired fairly recently
from the Delaware. Blind masks are an enigma to ethnographers.
They have no eyeholes and were formerly used in the rites of the
Idos medicine society, where the wearer demonstrated his ability to
find and identify hidden objects. Today they never appear in public
and the Indians are unwilling to talk about them, a secretiveness
Fenton attributes to lack of knowledge, for blind masks have been
ceremonially obsolete for over a century. Except in the case of the
divided mask where red and black symbolize east and west, color
seems to be irrelevant and is not correlated with any other feature.
Although some Iroquois attribute greater power to black masks
while others favor the red, the two colors are equally common.
As might be expected, Fenton found that the Seneca do not adhere
rigidly to their own classification; types are not definable in terms of
form alone. Since masks are usually carved according to dreams or
visions, the conception portrayed by the carver may be ignored by
the subsequent owner of the mask. Most masks regardless of form
rise in status with age and use, so that many Beggar masks are in
time promoted to the role of Doctor or Doorkeeper. Some Indians
refuse to recognize any classification, saying that there are as many
mask types as there are people.
One general observation may be added to Fenton’s discussion, as it
pertains to a consideration of tribal styles. While it is quite possible
to plot the spatial distribution of variations in formal characteristics
and so determine which masks are today most prevalent in a particular
locality, there is little assurance that these types taken together
comprise a traditional tribal style. For almost-200 years the Iroquois
Ne IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 371
have been living on reservations on which two or more of the five
tribes are represented.!! This proximity has tended to break down
the minor differences between them and there is no reason to sup-
pose that art forms escaped the process of intertribal acculturation.
Even before the reservation period, the League brought the Iroquois
into close association, socially and religiously as well as politically,
and provided ample opportunity for the observation and exchange of
ceremonial properties such as masks. The assumption of definite and
distinct tribal styles in the precontact period is, therefore, a doubtful
one. Certainly today the stylistic differences that are characteristic
of the various reservations must be taken as the outgrowth of fairly
recent local developments rather than the persistence of ancient tribal
traditions.
There is very little material on which to base an accurate account
of the stylistic development of Iroquois masks. Because of the perish-
able nature of wood, a hundred years is probably the maximum age
of any mask now in existence, and many of this vintage were destroyed
by the Christians and the early converts of Handsome Lake who were
taught to regard them as idols and ‘devil faces.”’ Of those that have
survived, either on the reservations or in museums and private collec-
tions, few have been accurately dated. The carvings themselves
offer no clues to age, for many modern masks are given an antique
finish to make them look old. Historical records as a source of
material by which to chart fluctuations in style are of limited value,
since early descriptions of masks are too few and too general to permit
a detailed reconstruction.
Keppler (1941, p. 18) has ventured the opinion that at first all
masks were carved in the likeness of the original False Face, depicting
his twisted mouth and broken nose. Divergence from this basic type
occurred as certain formal characteristics which proved ritually effica-
cious were emphasized and others that seemed useless were eliminated.
Further variations may have evolved when the carvers sought to re-
produce the mysterious maladies which distort the human body, or
when they attempted to frighten the spirits of disease by heightening
the fearsome appearance of the masks.
Keppler’s theory of development has some basis in the origin
legend and the present widespread distribution of crooked-mouth
masks, although there is little evidence to support his assertion that
the variety of masks observed today all evolved from a single basic
type. Certainly, style was affected by the function and meaning
of the carvings. Fenton (1956, p. 352) considers the false faces to be
“grotesque portrayals of specific disease somatotypes,” and he points
"1 Cattaraugus Reservation, while predominantly Seneca, also has the Cayuga and Onondaga; Tona-
wanda: Seneca and Cayuga; Allegany: Seneca and Onondaga; etc.
ate BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
to the striking parallels between the stylistic features and the motor
behavior of the dancers on the one hand, and the illnesses of face and
body which the rituals seek to relieve.
European contact had an influence on style, if for no other reason
than that the introduction of metal tools revolutionized carving tech-
niques. The exact nature of the changes which followed, or how
quickly they took place, cannot be described, since there are no
accounts of masks before 1678, some 80 years after contact had been
established. It may be assumed that the carvings became more
ornate and detailed, that the workmanship became more finished,
and that many new types, previously too difficult to attempt with
the old methods of charring and scraping, were developed.!? Spoon-
lipped masks and those with widely flaring mouths may be examples
of such innovations. As better tools made woodcarving less arduous
and time consuming, more people may have engaged in maskmaking,
which would be another factor in expanding the range of variability.
New and more spectacular effects were also achieved through the
use of new materials. Buffalo manes and braided cornhusks which
had served as hair were replaced by long horsetails, eyes were rimmed
with sheet metal instead of clamshells, and bright commercial paints
were substituted for earth pigments.
During the last two centuries the majority of false faces have under-
gone few fundamental changes, although the trend toward diversifi-
cation and the adoption of new forms has continued. Some
innovations seem to have been inspired by western rather than native
concepts, such as the horned masks devised by a Seneca artist in
1900 which have a diabolical appearance and may, according to
Fenton, be caricatures of White gods. Very modern types include
representations of Felix the Cat, Mickey Mouse, and Charlie Chaplin
that have been added to the Beggar class, while masks with cigars
in their mouths are among those made professionally and offered for
sale at Cattaraugus. False faces of this type are relatively rare,
however, as compared with the number carved according to the old
patterns. In the latter, the basic features, the proportions, and the
treatment of details combine to produce an effect differing little from
that described by John Bartram in 1743.
We were entertained by a very comical fellow in as odd a dress as Indian
folly could devise. He had on a clumsy vizard of wood, coloured black with a
nose four or five inches long, a grinning mouth set awry furnished with long teeth,
round the eyes circles of bright brass, surrounded by larger circles of white paint,
from his forehead hung long tresses of buffalo hair, and from the catch part of
his head ropes made of plaited husks of Indian corn . . . . In my whim I saw
another vizard of this kind hung by the side of one of their cabins in another
town. [Bartram, 1751, pp. 43-44.]
12 The introduction of metal tools had essentially this effect on woodcarving of the Northwest Coast.
Amor T 22) IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 373
This description substantially agrees with that of Morgan in 1851,
with the accounts given by Beauchamp, Converse, and Parker in
the early 1900’s, and could be applied to many of the masks which
are carved today.
MASK CARVING AT ONONDAGA RESERVATION
THE COMMUNITY
Onondaga Reservation lies in a valley 1 mile south of the city
limits of Syracuse, not far removed from the ancient tribal site on
Onondaga Lake. The Indians were guaranteed possession of their
lands by Government treaty in 1795, the terms of which provide an
annual allowance of salt and cloth to every member of the tribe.
Considerably reduced by forced sales in the early 1800’s, the reser-
vation now encompasses about 6,100 acres of farmland and scrub
timber. The population is a little less than a thousand, an increase
of almost 100 percent over the last 10 years owing to an influx of
Iroquois from Canada who have come seeking jobs in Syracuse.
To a casual observer, Onondaga is not markedly different from
other rural areas in this part of the State. The small framehouses
are similar to those of the surrounding regions, and although many
are old and some in a dilapidated condition, others are modernized
to the extent of having plumbing and electricity; radios are common
and television sets are not unusual. Even the Council House, the
traditional focus of political and religious activities, is a common-
place, whitewashed structure resembling a country schoolhouse.
Other public buildings are three Protestant churches, the Federal
gerade school, and the National Youth Association building which
was constructed by the Government during the depression and now
serves aS a community center. For food and other necessities,
commercial amusements, and education beyond the primary level,
the Indians are dependent on Syracuse or Nedrow, a small White
community on the edge of the reservation.
Although Onondaga is not a prosperous community, neither is
there much real poverty. Most families own their own homes and
hold an acre or more of land which belongs to the tribe and is tax
free. Some raise a few crops for their own use, but much of the soil is
poor and no large-scale farming is done. The principal source of
income is employment in Syracuse where 90 percent of the men, and
some of the women, have jobs in factories or shops or on construction
gangs; a large proportion of this number, however, is periodically on
Government relief.!°
13 It was my impression that the majority of these men were unemployed by choice rather than necessity,
as work is not difficult to obtain today.
374 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Despite the fact that the Indians have taken over the material
culture and subsistence patterns of the Whites, traditional Iroquois
customs persist in some aspects of their lives. Insofar as the reserva-
tion is allowed autonomous government, it is controlled by a council
of 26 chiefs who are chosen according to the ancient precepts of the
League; women nominate their sons if they are worthy. Although
somewhat disorganized and subject to internal dissension, the council
constitutes a strong conservative block, holding tenaciously to the
old ways and opposing innovations of any kind. Christians are
not allowed to hold office even if they are eligible for chieftainships
in the maternal line. Other evident retentions are: the native lan-
guage, which is spoken by a segment of the population; the clan and
moiety systems, which function in the seating of the chiefs in the
Council House; and the religion, most evident when one moiety gives
a ceremony for the other. Some of the aboriginal games have sur-
vived—gambling with dice made of peach stones or deer buttons,
and “snow snake’ in which a long slender rod of wood is thrown in
a trough of snow. Lacrosse, the national sport of the Iroquois, still
arouses enthusiasm; the Onondaga have their own team which plays
at other reservations and occasionally at neighboring universities.
Although the Christian missions are strongly entrenched at Onon-
daga, the Episcopalians having the majority of converts, approxi-
mately one-third of the community adheres to the old forms of worship
as modified by the teachings of Handsome Lake.'* Known as the
Long House or Council House religion, it includes the recitation of
moral precepts from the Code, the confession of sins, and the cele-
bration of the traditional festivals. The False Faces are an integral
part of Council House creed and ritual, as they continue to appear
at the New Year’s Festival when they dance and cure with ashes, to
make their rounds of the reservation in the spring and fall, and to hold
private ceremonies for those who request their services. Theoretically
all members have at one time undergone treatment by the society,
but many who have not been initiated in this manner participate in
the curative rites and so have come to be regarded as part of the band.
Possibly it is the relaxation of the original requirements for mem-
bership that is responsible for the uncertainty in the minds of the
Onondaga as to the present size of the society. Estimates range
between 13 and 100, the former probably being the number who have
been formally initiated. In recent years a White man from Syracuse
has been admitted. He visits the reservation frequently, takes an
active part in the rituals, and is considered by his associates in the
4 This number is not an actual count but an estimate given to me by the woman who has charge of the
Episcopalian mission. She considers the Onondaga to be one-third Christians, one-third pagans, and one-
third nothing in particular,
Anthrop. Pap.
"No. 74] IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 375
society to be an authority on the meaning and use of the masks.
In this sense he is more “Indian” than the Indians themselves,
insisting that the ancient concepts be followed and the ancient forms
observed.
The rivalry and suspicion which exist between the Christian
church and the Council House do not prevent a frequent change from
one congregation to another on the part of many of the members.
Some vacillate continually between the two, forsaking the church when
they feel they have been slighted or insulted there, only to return
when something upsets them at the Council House. Even those who
remain permanently affiliated with one religious system tend to take
advantage of what the other has to offer. Thus Council House people
usually bring their children to be baptized at the church, while many
“good” churchmen who have been Christians for generations attend
the festivals at the Council House and call in the False Faces when
the White doctor fails to effect a cure. This inclination to “play it
safe’ is strikingly exemplified in the not uncommon practice of
giving the deceased two separate services; a Christian burial and a
Dead Feast at the Council House. Nor is a belief in witchcraft
confined to one religious group. Although the fear of being ‘“‘witched”’
and the conviction that some persons have the power to transform
themselves into animals are more prevalent among the Council
House people, the Christains too sense the threat of unseen evils.
They may laugh at the more “backward and superstitious Indians”’;
but they do not care to walk out alone at night, have an uneasy
feeling that a screech owl is an omen of impending danger, and tell
stories of being chased by creatures that are half-human, half-animal.
The traditional arts have not fared as well under the impact of
acculturation as have the religious and political systems, since the
acceptance of western material culture leaves most of them no function
in the society. Under the auspices of the National Youth Association,
classes in Indian handicraft were held for a time at the community
center by an Onondaga woman who has taught in summer camps.
These classes did not include instruction in mask carving, and since
they did not succeed in arousing much interest, they have been dis-
continued. Other than this there has been no organized attempt to
develop or preserve the old skills and, with the exception of wood-
carving, those which have survived do so because they have a com-
mercial value as Indian souvenirs. Many of the women do a little
beadwork at home. The belts, bracelets, lapel pins, and moccasins
which they make are as much “Indian” as Iroquois in design; the
15 This man, Pete Hest, gave me little information beyond the fact that he likes Indians and has been
associated with them at summer camps where he picked up his interest in Indian lore. He is regarded
somewhat suspiciously by many of the Christians on the reservation who wonder what he is up to.
376 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
traditional floral patterns are rarely used while such Plains motifs
as the arrow and the swastika are combined with simple geometric
forms. More nearly related to the old culture are the cornhusk dolls
and baskets, but colors in the latter are garish and the shapes adapted
to the practical needs of the customers. One basketmaker, comment-
ing on the fact that much of the work is neither ‘‘true Iroquois” nor
of a high quality, put the blame on the necessity of conforming to
White standards. ‘‘Most people don’t appreciate authentic work.
They judge by the size, not the quality, and want the most for the
least money.’”’ The products of the women, along with bows and
arrows made by the men, are sold at the New York State Fair held
once a year in Syracuse and in roadside stands put up on the reserva-
tion to attract the summer visitors.‘* Almost the only craft which is
not produced exclusively for the tourist trade is woodcarving. Some
of the men carve lacrosse sticks, snow snakes, unornamented wooden
paddles for stirring food, and masks, all of which are still used by the
Council House people. However, with the exception of lacrosse
sticks, which are sold to university teams as well as to local players,
none of these articles is made in any quantity.
The intermingling of Iroquois and White patterns as it exists at
Onondaga today, particularly in the area of religion, seems to suggest
that there is no clear-cut line between those Indians who have ac-
cepted western culture and those who have resisted some aspects of it.
Yet there is a differential reaction to acculturation which is based,
although not invariably, on tribal affiliation and which follows from
the relationship between Onondaga descent, politics, religion, and
language. Active participation in native politics is directly dependent
on tribal affiliation and is restricted to Onondagas because chieftain-
ships are hereditary within the tribe. The aboriginal religion is in-
directly linked with Onondaga descent in two ways: by the rule that
chiefs must belong at least nominally to the Council House, and by
the fact that Christians are more apt to marry out of the tribe. The
association between linguistic patterns and descent is more tenuous,
but it seems reasonable to suppose that regular attendance at the
Council House, where the old language is used, would encourage its
retention.
Those who are not Onondagas comprise a large proportion of the
population, since they include the members of other Iroquois tribes
living on the reservation as well as the descendants of those who have
18 Any attempt on the part of an outsider to compete with these local establishments is deeply resented,
as in the case of a woman who has recently arrived on the reservation, set up a large crafts stand and under-
cut the other craftsmen. It is rumored that she buys her wares cheaply in Canada, and she is generally
disliked for ‘‘muscling in ”’
Anthrop,, Pap. TROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY att
intermarried into these tribes or with the Whites.!’ These people
have no voice in the government and are allowed to hold land only if
one of their grandparents was an Onondaga. Thus they are disposed
to discard the aboriginal values and adopt western ones, as by birth,
if not by choice, they are already marginal to the old culture. As one
of this group put it, ‘Anyone not an Onondaga is always regarded as
an outsider.”
There is, of course, a great deal of variation within the two groups,
and possibly a careful analysis would reveal the existence of a number
of subgroups, overlapping but distinguishable on the basis of individual
reactions to change.'® Nor can it be claimed that tribal affiliation is
the only or even the most important determinant of acculturation,
although it seems to carry a greater weight than any other obvious
factor such as age.
There are indications that the compromise between the old culture
and the new, and between the people who identify with them, is an
uneasy one both for individuals and for the community as a whole."
The suppressed animosity between the church and the Council House,
the ambivalence evident in the sudden shift from one religion to the
other, the conflict between those who wish to preserve the native
traditions and those who wish to make the reservation “‘progressive,”’
and a certain defensiveness on the part of those who have clung to
the old ways, are some of the more overt manifestations of the tension
and anxiety which result from the attempt to strike a balance between
two divergent cultures. Among some of the Indians, particularly the
younger generation, Iroquois retentions seem to be one of the reactions
to the insecurity which they feel in their situation—a self-conscious
return to the aboriginal culture which they have idealized and which
they believe offers a safer, more satisfactory way of life. This nativism,
which is individual, spasmodic, and unorganized, is an important
element in mask carving and will be discussed subsequently in greater
detail.
THE CARVERS
Maskmaking at Onondaga is neither a profession nor a full-fledged
craft recognized by the community as such. Rather, its status is that
of a part-time activity carried on by a small group of men who do not
depend upon it as a source of income. Those who engage in the art
17 Since descent is matrilineal, this does not include the offspring of marriages in which the woman is
Onondaga. In these cases, even if the father is White, the children retain their tribal membership.
18 The categories which Voget (1951, pp. 220-231) used in his analysis of Iroquois society on the Caugh-
nawaga Reservation in Canada might, with more careful investigation, prove to apply equally well to
Onondaga. On the basis of differential reactions to acculturation, he divided the community into four
groups: native, native-modified, American-modified, and American-marginal.
19 By “‘identify’’ I mean that people define themselves as belonging to a particular group (in this case
Indian or White) and refer their behavior to the values which they attribute to that group.
378 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
are a fraction of the total population and few even in relation to that
segment which identifies with the aboriginal culture. There are not
more than 12 living on the reservation today who are known to be
maskmakers, and of this number it is only the younger men—those
between the ages of 25 and 45—who have done much carving within
the last few years (see table 1, p. 381). Iwas told that in the past more
of the older generation made masks but that now the work is hard
on their eyes and in general too arduous.
The amount of time devoted to carving is not great, although it
varies from one carver to another. No one works at it regularly
throughout the year, and some seem to regard it almost as a hobby or
recreation to occupy their spare time. While several of the men have
made as many as a dozen masks, others have turned out only one or
two. Eddie Schenandoah, who is at present employed in Syracuse, is
one oi the most productive of the carvers whereas Allison Thomas,
whose job as caretaker of the community center leaves him free for
most of the day, has done comparatively little. Thus, differences in
creativity do not seem to be related to the amount of leisure time a
man has at his disposal. More probably such differences are de-
pendent on the individual’s interest and success in carving, and on
whether he finds the work easy or difficult.
At only one period of the year does maskmaking approximate a
full-time occupation. This is in the winter, a couple of months before
the New Year’s Festival. Several informants remarked that although
they have no particular desire to carve during the rest of the year, they
“begin to get a feeling for it’’ at about this season and then work
steadily in order to be ready for the annual appearance of the False
Faces in the Council House.
With few exceptions those who carve the masks are those who use
them. They are adherents to the native religious system who have
never been Christians, are apostates from the church, or attend the
Council House as well as the church. Most seem to be active partici-
pants in the False Face rituals and members of the medicine society.
They are also central to the old culture through tribal affiliation,
language, and association with native politics. Two are chiefs and
three are the sons of the present head of the council and themselves
eligible for office. The carvers who are marginal to the old culture are
those who do little or no mask carving today. Floyd Doctor is a
Seneca and, as far as I know, is not a member of the Council House.
He picked up the art on the Tonawanda Reservation ‘“‘because there
was nothing else to do during the depression,’’ but has done very little
with it since he came to Onondaga. Two other men call themselves
carvers although they are avowed Christians and belong to the more
acculturated portion of the population. Of these, however, Stanley
An eat ~=IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 379
Pierce admits that he has not carved for many years, while Andrew
Pierce claims to make masks but is repudiated by the Council House
people who say that although he has made bows and arrows, he has
never carved a false face.
The carvers are not regarded primarily as craftsmen either by the
community or by themselves. The reservation as a whole speaks of
them as Council House people and members of the False Face Society,
while the Christians add the statement that they are lazy. The
prevailing sentiment among this group is that only Indians who do
nothing else do carving, an assertion which has some basis in fact, as
the maskmakers tend to belong to the less prosperous element on the
reservation, being frequently out of work and on Government relief.
Among themselves the carvers seem to identify with each other
more on the basis of their membership in the medicine society and
their common interest in masks than on their technical and artistic
ability as craftsmen. Several, when they were asked for the names
of other carvers, included Floyd Henhawk, who makes the turtle rat-
tles used by the False Faces and who wears the masks but has never
made one. Nor could any one of them give me a complete list of those
in the community who do or who have done carving, four or five
persons being the most some could recall, while others could think of
only one or two. The two men who were most frequently mentioned
and who come closest to having the status of craftsmen are Eddie
Schenandoah and Kenneth Thomas; the first is known for his ability
to turn out a mask in a week, and the other for his careful, finished
work.
The general lack of recognition accorded the carvers as such is due,
at least in part, to the small number of masks that are produced today
and to the close association of these carvings with religion rather than
with any of the other crafts. Maskmaking is not necessarily related
to the carving of lacrosse sticks, snow snakes, etc., since only three
of the men who carve masks also make these objects. The others
limit themselves to the false faces and say that they have no intention
of trying anything else. Nor is maskmaking associated with the
women’s crafts. The wives of some of the carvers do beadwork, but
women whose husbands are not carvers are just as apt to engage in
this work. There is a somewhat closer link with the cornhusk masks
which some of the mothers and aunts of the carvers have made in
the past. Very few of this type, however, are made today.
The fact that mask carving was formerly a ceremonial procedure
suggests that this art has always cut across the other craft speciali-
zations and been associated with the medicine societies. There
are, however, no historical materials to validate this supposition,
just as there is no information as to the amount of carving which
380 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
was done, its relative importance in Iroquois culture as compared
with other activities, the age of the carvers and their position in the
society, or the kind of prestige and satisfaction they derived from
their occupation. Quain (1937, pp. 267-268, 279) mentions that
skill as a craftsman was one of the ways to gain esteem without
reference to inherited claims, but taken in context, his statement im-
plies that it was their contribution to the general welfare of the
society rather than their artistic achievements per se which brought
the craftsmen recognition.
Taking into consideration what is known about the aboriginal
patterns and the foci of Iroquois culture, it is probable that occupa-
tional differentiations were never well developed but that, to the ex-
tent of this development, craftsmen were accorded less prestige than
those whose contributions were in the realm of politics, oratory,
and warfare. One can guess that masks were never made in any
quantity and that although certain men might have been judged to
be better carvers than others, it was their proficiency in manipulating
the carvings as religious symbols in the curative rituals rather than
their ability to create them that set these individuals apart from the
rest of the society. It is even conceivable that mask carving was
itself a religious technique and was regarded as were clairvoyance and
prophecy—a special form of supernatural power or orenda. The
power to carve would then have been bestowed, along with the power
to heal, on any individual who was initiated into the False Face
Society.
If this historical reconstruction is correct, it is evident that what
may be termed the sociological aspects of maskmaking—the position
of the art in the culture and the role of the artists in the community—
have not changed materially under the impact of acculturation, but
are essentially the same today as they were in the aboriginal society.
ECONOMICS OF MASK CARVING
Masks were originally clan property, were later acquired by the
medicine society, and finally came to be individual possessions which
were handed down within families. Exchange in ownership was a
ritual rather than an economic transaction and was effected by the
new owner adding his bag of tobacco to those already attached to the
mask (Keppler, 1941, p. 17). There is not enough historical data to
permit an accurate account of the economic significance of the carvings
in the aboriginal culture. However, since they were ceremonial
objects, masks probably had little if any commercial value within
the society, an assumption which explains why the Europeans were
able to purchase them at a very low price during the 18th and 19th
centuries (Beauchamp, 1905 a, p. 191). Later, when the Indians
IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 381
Anthrop. Pap.
No. 74]
a eee ee a
“MOU 9UOU SeXvUI ng ‘epueM
*qoanyo
“BUOT, JB SYSVUI PoAIeo ATIOMIOT | ueyedoostdy spusjye ‘ueysIyO
*"SYSVUL OAIVO 04 SUITRTO
‘soy puey xB ‘smolIe pue sMOog
*‘sIBoA Moy 4Sed UT SUpAIvO
WONUL JON “BpueMvUO,T, 7B SHOTS
OSSOLNB] ‘SMOIIG PUB SMO ‘SYseyT
od
“SYSCIN
*SOUBd MO} B SYSCUL VSI T
*SYOI4S OSSOIOV]
‘soyeus MOus ‘se[pped ‘syseur os1v'T
*YSBUL OSI T
"SMOLIG PUB SMO Mo} B OSTY
“SOTO [[VUIS 9ULOS PUL SHSVU OSIV] ZT
"SOTO [[VUIS OOS PUB SYSeU OIC] TT
“somo
Tews Auepy ‘“qyouuexy I9q101q
STU UJTM 00 pus oUO[S YsvuL osAV] T
~~ *90TLO YOS VSSOINey B Pert}
‘SMOLIG pue SMO ‘seyeUS Moug
“SoUO [[eUIs AUBUL PUB SYSVM OFIL] F
“SOO [[BUIS OUIOS PUG SYSVUL 9BIR] Z
"eyep 03 euop
SUIAIGO JO JUNOUIe pus sdA J,
*qoinyo ueredoosid gq 94
ye juepue}ye sIeynse1 ‘ueystqO
“HOLSI[ IS SNOISI[o1 reyn
-oyjed Auw 9Avy 0} des JOU seOq
Ajqeqoid pue
"SOOB,T OSTRT
esnoy, plunog
‘MOU JOU JI 4sed UI Se0e,q, asTRT
Ajqeqoid pues
esnoy, juno
*SOOBT OSTBT Of} JO JopRoy
AjjouI0J +pue esnoyx, pouNoD |------------ 7 aaa ODT Se Sar ee oe oe ae eee peiyow
‘MOT YOU JI ysvd UT sooR,T asyeyy
Ajqeqoid pues
Ajqeqoid pure
esnoyy pmunog
"SOB iT OSTRT
esnoy pPunoD
Sesser OD = aa i | ow a ee a as SUED UOUG
~-“sa0B,J OSB PU OsSHOF [OUND
"STRNYII 908]
Os[BT Ul Soyedtotsed pues osnozy
JPunog
spue}12
osTy “uery
“SHYO ST OUM oJIM TIM Sspueqye
‘yoyo uerpedoosidg Jo 1oqme yy
oy} Al[euoIseo00 pue
eSB OY JO JoquIayy
Jeun0g + Aou
*IOPBOT
$9087
‘asnoyL
‘UBYSUgO uO
TOs Toy
“OUT M
JOT{OUL SUOeITe [eq ON
esnovihg Ul ¥10M Apvayg
“pueys s}je10 WOW
SULODUT ‘MOTVAIOSOI PUNOIC PULT
QonUl SUMO ‘peiljel Mou fasno
-BIAG UT Jo10ge, poT[rys Aj1ou110,7
“AqraeystgO dn
OATS OF posnyor ynq drysure,
Joyo OJ o[qIsIje ‘esepuouO
aoe ae epueMeuoy, WOT Bootleg
fa Ree Sa esepuoug
oe Jorge 8 oq Avul ‘esepuoug
‘sorpped pus sxol4s osso.10
arse ae JoIyo esVpuoUO | -B[ WO ouOoUT [[eUIS ‘pert,0xT
pofo[duroun sureeg
“Ieq jou welD A;Aour
10} SVAN JOYJOUL ‘esepuoUO | A[Ipvoys Ayiyey osnovidg UT SyIOM
*qol Apeojs ou oAvy 0} sures
pos ae oe ee ee op--"""| ‘esnoeidg ul YIoMm yeuolse09
‘posojdueun Ayyuenbey
Sk ee a eee op--"~"| ‘esnoeiAg Ul JeL0qe, pel[rysuq
drqsureqyjorqo *109Ue0 AVTUNMAOLOD
JOY 9{QIST[9 ‘[:0uNn0d oY) JO 94} JO 1oyeJo1vd MOU ‘esnoBIAg
Jorl[o peey JO aos ‘vsepuoUGg | UI UO pue Yo poy0M ApiouI0,
HONS [eotod pus yeqry, snyeqs oTaOm0N TT
DEDPUOUQ ID SLandD—T AAV I,
96-08
*(MoIPUY JO
Aeyqdeu) sd101g Aopueyg
THe Wel
toaln AAV'T
OYOULG 95.1094)
TITH PreMOFT
“Qed jo
Moyqdeu) Jemoy, somes
ag eee = en ne IOULOFT 48d
~~~“ Yeopuvueyos oppay
* (@OSTITV
JO 104}01q) seumoy,y, 90T
"(WosTITV Jo 10
“4jorq) semoy,L, WouTAy
n> x, Seuloyy, WOSsT Ty
ouleN
682—611—_64——30
382 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
realized that the carvings had a monetary value for the Whites,
their attitude began to shift in the direction of greater conformity
to western standards. This change may be responsible for the fact
that masks are now private rather than community property.
Today at Onondaga the economic aspects of maskmaking are still
minimized by those who identify with the traditional Iroquois pat-
terns. In this respect the art differs from the beadwork and basket-
weaving of the women, which are openly acknowledged to be
commercial enterprises, as well as from carving on some other reser-
vations where masks are made specifically for the tourist trade and
it is possible to order ‘‘a genuine Iroquois false face’”’ by mail. Some
Onondagas maintain that masks, being ceremonial properties, should
never be sold, although the more prevalent opinion holds that it is
use which makes the carvings sacred and that they may be sold if
they have never been ‘doctored’? or worn in a ceremony. The
chiefs have forbidden sales at the State Fair and from the roadside
stands on the reservation and do all they can to prevent the old masks
from falling into the hands of the Whites. The position which the
carvers themselves have taken toward selling their work is somewhat
inconsistent. They assert quite positively that although it is per-
missible to sell and trade masks among the members of the False
Face Society and the other Council House people, it is wrong to deal
with outsiders, particularly as Pete Hest has told them to keep all
the carvings they make. Actually, however, most of them have on
occasion done business with the Whites or with those Indians who
have no scruples about selling to the Whites; some have even parted
with their ‘doctored’? masks when they were in need of money.
How this contradiction between their statements and their actions is
rationalized, I do not know. When questioned individually, each
carver intimated that although he had never sold a ‘‘doctored’”’ mask,
he knew of others who had done so, but that these were cases in
which there were extenuating circumstances, usually of a financial
nature. It may be that they regard the traditional prohibitions as
ideal standards of conduct which they feel obliged to follow only
when they do not conflict with economic necessity. It is also possible
that the leniency which the individual carver displays, toward those
who accept the norms but occasionally fail to observe them, may
serve to assuage his own feelings of guilt when he finds himself in a
similar position.
The attitude of the more acculturated Onondagas is far more ex-
plicit. ‘The Christians and others who have no respect for the in-
junctions of the Council House look upon the false faces as Indian
curios which may have a monetary value. Of these people, however,
only Andrew Pierce has openly attempted to commercialize the art
Anthrop-,F2P- IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 383
by setting himself up as a dealer in masks. Along with the bows
and arrows, snow snakes, and a group of miscellaneous items which
he calls Indian relics, he has a collection of carvings which he lends
to the members of the False Face Society, but will also sell to anyone
willing to purchase. Most of the masks Pierce has at the present
time have been obtained from carvers who have pawned them to
him for a few dollars. When they attempt to buy them back, he
refuses to sell at the same price, holding them instead for what he
can get from White collectors. In the past he had several steady
customers in Syracuse, among them a wealthy brewer who bought the
carvings now owned by the city’s Historical Society. Since Pierce
does business publicly from a small craft shop, he has incurred the
enmity of the Council House for defying the ruling of the chiefs.
By the carvers he is regarded as a middleman who buys cheap and
sells high, making a profit on other people’s work.”
There seems to be no standard price on masks. The cost of a
particular carving depends on how valuable it is to the individual
who is selling it, how much he is in need of money at the time, and
“what he thinks the traffic will bear.’’ Pierce values his masks at
anywhere from $5 up to $300, although doubtless the latter amount
is the asking price and he would accept less. He puts the highest
figures on carvings which appear to be old and those which he con-
siders to be traditional Iroquois types, because White customers
will pay more for masks that ‘look Indian.”’ To achieve this effect
he sometimes adds teeth or tusks to those masks which he believes
are not “fierce enough,” and substitutes clam shells for the tin around
the eyes. ‘‘When masks have tin on them, people think they are
made by Whites instead of Indians.”” As the Council House people
refuse to discuss price, at least on an abstract level, I have no infor-
mation as to what monetary value they place on false faces. Pierce’s
criteria—antiquity and conformity to tradition—are probably always
important determinants both within the community and outside of
it, while other factors, such as technical excellence and the time
spent on the carving, may also enter in.
In contrast to the large masks, the small ones have lost their
religious associations for most people and are made specifically for
sale. They can be bought at the State Fair, at the roadside stands,
and at the community center for one or two dollars. Most of the
younger carvers make some of this size which they sell whenever
they have the opportunity. Lee Thomas formerly did a brisk business
20 This may be the reason behind the carvers’ assertion that Pierce is not a mask carver. However, I
was unable to obtain the information that would resolve the discrepancy between his statements and those
of others.
384 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
with the girls at Syracuse University, who bought them to wear as
lapel pins.
It has been pointed out that none of the crafts is an important
source of income to the Onondaga. The volume of business which is
done in beadwork and basketwork is small, and in the case of masks
almost nonexistent; even Andrew Pierce, who comes closest to openly
advertising his wares, probably sells no more than three or four masks
in the course of a year. The lack of explicit commercialization is not,
I think, due primarily to the traditionally sacred character of the
carvings, since the religious prohibitions against selling put no restraint
upon the Christians and can, when necessary, be circumvented by the
Council House people. Rather it is the economic situation which
prevents the carvers and the community as a whole from regarding
maskmaking as economically profitable. Within the reservation there
is very limited demand for false faces. The group which has a use for
them is a small proportion of the population, and most of these Indians
already own carvings which they have inherited from their families.
Nor is there a large market outside which can be exploited. The
Whites in Syracuse and the surrounding areas have come to look
upon the Onondaga as a minority group which lacks the qualities of
strangeness and savagery that are usually attributed to native peoples.
Since these particular Indians do not fit the conventional stereotype,
it follows that they are not quite authentic and that the articles which
they make are not “genuine Indian” handicrafts. Few tourists, there-
fore, visit the reservation with the intention of buying souvenirs,
while those who do are more apt to purchase the smaller and cheaper
items—the baskets, maskettes, bead belts and bracelets—than they
are the larger and more expensive masks for which they have no
practical use. .
The geographical situation of the reservation affects not only the
expectations of the Whites but also the attitude of the Indians.
Living as they do almost in the suburbs of Syracuse, most Onondagas
find that it is easier and more profitable to hold a job in the city than
to attempt to create a market for their native products. It seems that
it is expediency and particularly financial considerations, not religious
sanctions, which have kept the Onondaga from developing the economic
potentialities of mask carving.
RELIGIOUS ASPECTS OF MASKMAKING
In many respects the false faces appear to serve the same function
and elicit the same emotional responses of fear and reverence today
as they did in the aboriginal culture. The formal features of the
curative rituals have been retained, the mythology and religious
concepts validating the rituals are still known, and the ancient precepts
Anon T°?) IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 385
concerning the treatment of the masks are generally observed by those
who use them.
Accounts of the miraculous cures wrought by a particular mask
or the unusual powers possessed by another are cited by the Council
House people as proof of the positive supernatural attributes of the
carvings, while their potentialities for evil are illustrated by stories
of what has happened to persons who have been unfortunate enough
to offend them. One informant told me of a man whose face became
twisted because he had mocked a mask, and another related an incident
in which a woman was thrown into convulsions when she laughed at
the False Face company.
The masks which are currently worn by the members of the medicine
society are hung together in what is called the “Hodo’wi Room”’
of the community center. Most of these were made specifically for
the last Midwinter festival and all have been “‘doctored”’ in the ap-
proved manner by laying them face up on the floor of the Council
House and burning tobacco. Each mask has a bag of tobacco at-
tached to it and shows evidence of having been fed with corn mush.
The zeal of the Indians in carrying out the prescribed forms extends
even to those masks which are no longer in their possession. Al-
lison Thomas told me that he and some of the other carvers intend to
visit the Albany museum to “pay our respects to the old fellows up
there.’”’ Because those masks have been neglected for many years
they need to be talked to and propitiated with tobacco.
Yet despite the declarations of faith and the careful observance
of the traditional customs, there is some evidence that the old be-
liefs have faded or changed. Very few of my informants ever referred
to the supernatural beings which the masks represent. ‘This omission
may have arisen from a reluctance to reveal information of a sacred
nature to an outsider rather than from ignorance, although there
was little reticence in discussing the religious function of the masks.
Those few who did mention the Hodo’wi by name tended to do so
in the past tense. I was told that they used to live on the edge
of the reservation, that they used to be seen occasionally in the woods,
that the old people used to dream about them; always with the im-
plication that these events had taken place in the distant past. One
young carver made his doubts about the existence of these spirits
quite explicit when he observed that although he had been on every
part of the reservation, he had never been able to find one. It was
this same man who openly expressed skepticism about the efficacy of
the False Face rituals. In telling me of a ceremony which had been
given for him when he was a child, he wound up with the statement,
“T did get well, but of course I had been sick a long time and was
due to get well anyway.”
386 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Fear of the carvings, of seeing them or touching them, seems
to be confined to a few of the younger women. The wife of Allison
Thomas is said to be afraid to be alone in the community house; she
thinks she hears the masks talking at night and believes they were
the cause of a blizzard that occurred one winter. Several of the
other women called the masks “nightmares” and “‘scary,’’ but in these
instances I felt they were reacting less as Indians to the symbolic
content than as women to the grotesque appearance of the carvings.”
The older women take the masks for granted as do the men, who show
no overt signs of fear or caution when they are near them. They
handle the carvings, even those which have been ‘‘doctored,” with
familiarity and, what is more significant, allowed me to do the same.
Along with the probability that faith in the spiritual powers of the
false faces is no longer complete and unquestioning, there are obvious
indications that some of the practices and professed beliefs have
been recently acquired, or at least reinforced, from the outside. Most
of the members of the medicine society, and particularly the carvers,
have access to the literature on Iroquois masks and rituals through
Pete Hest. Their interest in and knowledge of these ethnographic
works came out many times in the course of interviews. One man told
me that although today at Onondaga the masks are called hodo’wi, the
real name is gagohsa (the Seneca term), and that he knew this was cor-
rect because he had seen it somewhere in a book. Another, in trying to
explain that the Onondaga do not classify their masks according to
Doctor, Doorkeeper, Beggar, and Dancing, as do the Seneca, read the
information from a pamphlet by Beauchamp. The illustrations in
Wissler’s “Lore of the Demon Mask” and Speck’s ‘Iroquois’? were
cited as a source of inspiration to the carvers when they are in need of
‘new ideas.”’
Dependence on the literature is coupled with a tendency to look to
Pete Hest for the correct forms of behavior. It is he who has told the
men that they should continue to carve masks, that they should keep
all they make, that they should not allow the Whites to profane them
by photographing them. His role in the medicine society is quite
definitely that of expert and teacher. Under his guidance about 10 of
the members gather at the community center on winter nights. Here
in the room where the masks are hung they eat corn soup, learn the
traditional songs from the older men, and study ‘Indian lore.”
Although his injunctions to observe the ancient customs are not
always obeyed, his knowledge of them commands much respect, for I
was repeatedly referred to him as the authority on masks and as the one
person who could tell me everything I wanted to know. To what
21 Women in our culture to whom I showed pictures of Iroquois masks reacted in much the same way
and used almost identical words—“‘hideous,” “‘frightening,”’ etc.
Anihrop-,F2P- JTROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 387
extent he is directly responsible for the preservation of the False Face
Society it is difficult to judge. However, he is certainly an important
influence in shaping the attitudes and actions of the younger men.
As one informant put it, “If Pete Hest is not ashamed to act like an
Indian, we should not be.”
The carvers’ reaction to Whites who show a familiarity with
Iroquois ethnography is, to a lesser degree, similar to their reaction
to Hest. The willingness of the younger men to explain the purpose
of the masks and describe the rituals in which they are used contrasts
sharply with the behavior of the older ones—who, for the most part,
refused to talk to me at all—and seems to indicate a desire on the part
of the former to prove themselves “real Indians.’’ A concrete in-
stance of their efforts to make what they consider to be the proper
responses occurred when I inquired if the masks in the community
center should be hung facing out, as they were when I first saw them.
Allison Thomas, to whom I made this remark, then admitted that he
was breaking the rules, and the next time I came to the center, each
mask was hanging with its face turned to the wall. Several of my
other informants seemed almost apologetic because they could not
fulfill the expectations of the White visitor. One explained that he
could give me very little information because he had not “studied up
lately,”’ while another said that he did not know much about masks
but “If I had education, I could tell you more.”’
The material which has been presented does not permit a definitive
statement as to the attitude of the modern Onondagas toward their
masks. The problem of ascertaining belief is always difficult, and in
this case particularly so, since the Indians themselves are probably
not completely conscious of their own convictions. However, the fact
that most of the older men will not discuss the masks and their rituals
with outsiders suggests that they may have retained their faith in the
curative powers of the carvings, whereas the beliefs of the younger
men seem to have changed. Although conviction may be acquired
with age or experience with illness interpreted as due to the False
Faces, I feel that the majority of the men carving today do not regard
the masks as sacred but simply know that they should so regard them.
Their actions, insofar as I was able to observe them, and their state-
ments to me seem to add up to a self-conscious effort to adhere to those ,
patterns of behavior which they have learned are appropriate for
Indians.
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION
Maskmaking is regarded by the Onondaga as a skill which requires
no training or instruction of any sort. The reaction of the carvers
when they were asked who had taught them the art was one of astonish-
388 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
ment and the answer was invariably “no one.’? Some seem to be of
the opinion that carving is a native characteristic, insisting that “all
Indians carve,” ‘it comes natural to us,” “it’s just in us.” Even
Floyd Doctor, who admitted that he learned to make masks when the
Indian Arts Project was established at Tonawanda, made the state-
ment that carving is instinctive. Others, although they emphatically
denied that they had been taught to carve, said that they had picked it
up from watching the old men. ‘It’s a matter of interest. If you see
other people carving, you will want to start too.’’ Only one of the
carvers said that he had acquired his interest from a relative, in this
case anuncle. Therest could not remember that any member of their
family had ever carved before.
While there is certainly more verbal instruction than the carvers
are willing to admit, it is quite possible most do master the essentials
of the art without formal training. The technical processes of wood-
carving are fairly simple as compared to pottery or metalworking and
are such that they can be acquired by observation and imitation as
described by one of the men. ‘‘A man will stand around and watch
another man work. Then he will get his own piece of wood and
start as best he can.” Nor is there any expenditure of time or money
involved in gathering the materials and equipment, since wood can
be easily obtained anywhere on the reservation and the only indispen-
sable tool is a knife. I was told that many boys, even Christians, start
a maskette and then become discouraged when the wood splits or it
turns out to be more difficult than they had supposed. As Christians
have no use for the masks, they rarely continue, while Council House
people who are not successful in their first attempt are also likely to
give it up. Floyd Henhawk is one of those who said he had tried
carving but found it too difficult.
In the last few years there has been an opportunity to learn mask-
making not mentioned by any of my informants. The class in
Indian lore inaugurated by Pete Hest brings the carvers together at
the community center on an average of once a week in winter, and
many work on their masks during these sessions. Although Hest is
not himself a carver, he encourages the Indians in their efforts and
there is undoubtedly some instruction or at least advice offered to
the beginners by the more experienced. Indeed, one of the men told
me that he was in the habit of giving pointers to others and helping
them over some of the more difficult problems.
Two of the carvers, Lee and Kenneth Thomas, have received art
training outside of the reservation, as they studied drawing while
attending high school in Syracuse. Lee still does some painting,
mostly watercolors of Indians wearing masks. Neither of them,
however, could see any connection between these classes and their
Anthror, 22; IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 389
woodcarving. Lee in particular felt that he gained nothing from the
experience. ‘I didn’t like it because the teacher made me draw the
way she wanted. I like to follow my own ideas.”
Since maskmaking is learned informally, and often by the method
of trial and error, it is not surprising that the carvers minimize this
phase of the art. Yet their refusal to recognize that there are certain
situations, such as the class at the community center where teaching
does take place, constitutes a negative reaction out of proportion to
the facts.
It has been conjectured that maskmaking was originally regarded
by the Iroquois as a supernatural technique which was automatically
acquired with initiation into the medicine society. Granting the
validity of this assumption, the statement by one of my informants
that carving is a religous power indicates that some traces of this
belief have survived. Certainly if such a retention were widespread
it would account for the current opinion that instruction is unnec-
essary. There is, however, another factor in the attitude of the
Onondagas which is brought to light by their assertions that carv-
ing is instinctive, natural. Through reading the literature and
through contact with men like Hest, they have been impressed with
the fact that masks are an old Iroquois custom and an important
part of their cultural heritage. Therefore, in their effort to pre-
serve that heritage, it is natural that they should maintain, and
perhaps even believe, that carving is an inherent characteristic which
no “real Indian” has to be taught.
The problem of motivation, like the problem of religious conviction,
is not easily solved. The statements of the carvers are of little value
in this connection, since for the most part they seem to be reasons given
after the fact. ‘I got interested in carving and decided to try it’;
“T saw other people doing it’’; ‘I had some free time.”” One man
said that everybody would carve if he had good tools and a good place
to work; another that he had taken up the art because he had nothing
else to do and had continued because people had praised his work,
calling it outstanding. No one mentioned the profit motive. Actu-
ally, the lack of a market for masks makes it improbable that anyone
engages in the occupation for economic reasons.
It is possible that some do carve to gain recognition and prestige
among the small group which has an interest in masks. Among the
older men faith in the spiritual powers of the carvings may still be
the primary incentive. Nor must it be overlooked that maskmaking
affords a socially sanctioned outlet for creative impulses. Kenneth
Thomas is one of those who seem to derive satisfaction of an esthetic
nature from carving, as he lavishes much time and care on each mask
and turns out technically perfect work. Eddie Schenandoah is per-
390 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
haps another. Yet despite the fact that no one motive can be postu-
lated for all the carvers, either individually or as a group, the one
common factor among the younger men seems to be their desire to
conform to the old way of life. Since carving is regarded as a typi-
cal Iroquois activity, it provides an obvious means of relating to the
aboriginal culture, allowing the Onondaga to fulfill the conception
which they have of themselves as Indians.
TECHNICAL AND ESTHETIC PROCESSES
The ancient method of mask carving has long been obsolete. I
was told that no one on the reservation ever works on a live tree and
none of my informants could remember hearing that anyone had done
so within the past 100 years. Most of them, however, knew that it
was an old Iroquois custom, and one man expressed a desire to “‘try
it sometime.’”’ ‘Today there are no religious proscriptions placed upon
the carvers, and few traces remain of the rituals which were formerly
interwoven with the technical processes. One carver did say that
tobacco may be burned when the wood is being cut from the tree, but
I could not be sure whether he was describing a current practice or
simply stating what he knew to be the ancient, and therefore proper,
procedure.
Basswood still has the prestige of tradition and is generally pre-
ferred because it is a soft, light wood. ‘The carvers find it easy to
work and say that the finished product is light enough to wear with
comfort. Other types of wood which are used include poplar, well-
seasoned white pine, and butternut. As the latter is heavier than
basswood, it is not so apt to split. Cedar is considered too heavy,
and willow, though light, is difficult to carve because it has knots.
All of the carvers work the wood when it is very dry or almost rotten,
since by then it has already cracked and they can allow for this fact
in the carving. Sometimes the bark is stripped from a standing tree
so that it will die and be thoroughly dried out before it is felled.
Although a few of the Onondagas told me that masks should be started
in green wood and worked gradually over a long period of time, this
method was advocated only by noncarvers and is probably a retention
from the days when carving was done on a live tree.
The carvers’ basic tools are knives and chisels, but they employ
any tool which facilitates their work and allows it to progress more
quickly. The initial processes, which consist of cutting the wood
into the shape of a semicylinder and roughing out the features,
are performed with hatchets and saws. The holes for the eyes and
the mouth are made with drills, while small knives and files of various
kinds are considered necessary for refining the forms and finishing
the details. The crooked knife, traditional tool of the eastern In-
Anthrop. Pap. TROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 391
dians, is used along with chisels for hollowing out the back. Al-
though vices are owned by several of the carvers, they are never
used for masks. One man thought this tool might be helpful but
the others said that it would crack the mask after it had been hol-
lowed. The carver generally places the piece to be carved on a
larger block of wood or braces the carving against his chest or knees.
Always working with the grain of the wood, he carves either toward
or away from his body—whichever is easier in relation to the way he
is holding the mask.
While most masks are made from a single piece of wood, additions
such as teeth or tusks may be pegged in. Some men sandpaper
before they paint because they like a glossy surface; others prefer
the rough texture of the knife marks. Red is the favorite color;
occasionally, however, the carvings are given a dark brown finish
which makes them look antique. After the mask has been painted,
the hair is tacked on. This may be short fur which encircles the
face like a ruff or it may be the more traditional long horsehair. The
latter, which is obtained from a slaughterhouse in Syracuse, is dried
out and then pounded with a mallet to soften it.
There are certain individual differences in the methods of the
carvers. Some start to hollow the back before they have progressed
very far with the features, others finish up the front before they
begin on the back, and still others work the back and front alter-
nately. One man pointed out that he always tries to keep the
features at the same stage of development, since if one part gets
ahead of the rest it results in a poor carving. Several of the carvers
said they found it necessary to try their masks on while they were
working them to check the position of the eyeholes and to be sure
they fit without rubbing or scraping the face. The speed with which
the men carve also varies considerably. Kenneth Thomas works
very slowly, taking 3 to 4 months to complete one mask, whereas
Eddie Schenandoah is able to finish one in a week or less.
Most of my information on the techniques of carving was acquired
by questioning the men about their usual method of procedure rather
than by observation of the actual processes, since I was on the reserva-
tion during March and April, months which are ‘out of season” for
the maskmakers. None of the carvers were working on masks at this
time, nor could any of them be persuaded to start a large one for my
benefit. The excuses given were that they had just finished carving for
the Midwinter Festival, that they were too busy, or that they had no
properly seasoned wood. However, after I had displayed a great deal
of interest and curiosity, and had offered to pay him any amount of
money he thought fair, Allison Thomas agreed to make a maskette
for me.
392 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
This carving was done in a room of the community center adjacent
to that in which the masks are hung. The greater part of it was
accomplished during an evening session of about 4 hours, an hour on
the following morning being sufficient to complete the job. He made
no sketches before he started nor were there any masks or pictures of
masks in the room to which he could refer as models.
The only wood which Thomas had on hand and which he thought
suitable for his purpose was a small cylindrical piece of cedar. He
began by scraping the bark off the outside with a large knife, then
placed the piece on a larger block and split it down the center, using
his knife as he would a chisel by pounding on the top of it with a ham-
mer. Choosing one of the halves, he did some more scraping on the
rounded side, changed his knife for a smaller one and made two diag-
onal cuts across the top for the eyebrows, commenting that masks
needed all kinds of knives, big blades and little blades. ‘This one
(mask), I don’t really know how it’s going to look. It just keeps on
forming.” His wife, who was present at the time, said, ‘‘Make a funny
one.”
Using the point of his knife, he traced some lines on the wood,
seemingly trying out various possibilities, and indeed did remark,
‘This helps me plan the features.”” He then dug two little holes below
the brows, held the piece away from him to scrutinize it, and made a
cut near the bottom for the mouth. Taking up the larger knife again,
he sliced off the lower edges to form the chin. Another cut below the
first gave him the position of the lips and he began to dig between and
around them, saying as he did so that if he had been making a large
mask, he would have started using chisels at this stage of the work.
Before he had gotten very far with the mouth, however, he returned to
the eyebrows, cutting in above and below them so that they stood out
from the face. ‘I switch all over when I work. If I were to work on
just one feature it might spoil.’”” He also made the comment, which he
repeated several times later on, that this mask was completely
different from any he had previously carved or had ever seen. “I
never made one like this before. It forms as I make it. I don’t need
any designs; it’s right in my head.”
In rounding off the forehead, Thomas left a crestlike projection in
the center which joined the eyebrows and became the top of the nose.
Deep cuts around the nose and eyes brought them into relief and
formed the cheekbones. He continued to work on these features for
some time, and then went back to the chin, doing some slicing on the
sides to make it narrower and taking a large triangular piece off the
back which caused it to jut forward. This last operation was performed
with a saw on the log of wood he was using as a work bench. For the
Anthrop Pap. TROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 393
most part, however, he worked on his lap or braced the piece against
his chest.
Still using his knife, he marked a rectangular area on the back and
started to splinter out the wood in long strips. On a large mask he
would have drilled holes 3 or 4 inches deep along the lines he had drawn
and employed a chisel for the hollowing process. After making a
depression of about half an inch in the back, he drilled the eyes and
mouth from the front, again placing the mask on the log and holding
it steady with his knee. He then worked alternately on the back and
the front, giving special attention to the eyes, and remarked, “TI
never made eyes like this before.” By this time all the forms were
fairly well defined except the mouth, which had been neglected and
which he said was the hardest thing to do because it was apt to split.
If it is only a small split it can be glued or filled with plastic wood, but
if too large it spoils the mask. In fact, when he did get around to the
mouth, a small portion of the lower lip broke off. Before repairing the
damage, he went to work with a file, cutting two grooves above the
eyebrows, widening the eyes, and rounding off the sharp edges of all
the features. The chip from the mouth was then glued back into place
and the mask was set aside for the night, as Thomas said he could do
nothing more until the glue had dried.
When I arrived the next morning, he was already at work again,
hollowing the back and refining the forms with knives and files. Even
after he began to sandpaper, which is the final process, he kept return-
ing to these tools to clarify details and define the features more
sharply. He used sandpaper wound around a small screwdriver to
smooth the inside of the mouth and the eyes to which he again re-
ferred. ‘‘He’s got goggles. I never made them like this.”” He finished
the inside of the mask as he would have a large one, filing the edges
of the back to even them off and going carefully over all the rough
spots with sandpaper. He did not take equal pains with the sides of
the carving, however, explaining that ‘‘You don’t have to work real
good on the sides because you use hair.”” When he came to paint,
he used a bright red enamel for the main color, accentuating the eyes
with white and the brows with black. The horsehair could not be
put on until the mask had dried, but he had prepared two little
strands and showed me how they were to be fastened to the top with
tacks.
The finished product was about 6 inches high, a variation on the
crooked-mouth type of false face with round eyes and all the features
somewhat flattened (pl. 104). Thomas was quite proud of it, saying
that he was going to make a large one like it in basswood which he far
preferred to cedar. I believe it was the eyes that particularly pleased
him, as he felt they were unusual. Actually, round eyes are as com-
394 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
mon as any other shape, although he had made them oblong on his
two previous masks. He charged me $2, the standard price for a
maskette of this size, and later gave me some Indian tobacco in a
matchbox so that I could care for it in the proper fashion.
The frame of mind in which the carvers approach the problem of
making a mask seems to be that expressed by Thomas in his comment,
“Tt forms as I make it.’’ Several of the men said that they occa-
sionally drew a sketch before starting to carve or outlined the fea-
tures on the wood with a pencil, but they made it clear that this was
not their usual method of procedure. The others declared that no
preparation of this nature was necessary and all of them, even those
who admitted that they sometimes worked from a drawing, said
they never knew what kind of a mask they were going to make when
they started and had no idea how it would turn out until it was
finished. ‘I never have any plan when [I start, no ideas at all.
Funny, it just comes to you as you go along.” “I just go to work and
let it turn out as it will.” ‘The first piece I made I didn’t even
outline it in pencil. Just drilled the eyes and started digging in.”’
It is difficult to say how literally these statements can be taken.
Certainly a great deal of planning and thought goes into the creation
of a mask, and the comment, “I didn’t even outline it’”’ suggests that
outlining is in fact acommon practice and not an exception. However,
it is not necessary to assume that the analysis of the esthetic problem
always takes place on a conscious level. ‘The way in which Thomas
worked, without sketches, handling his tools with skill and moving
swiftly from one step to the next, seems to indicate that he was draw-
ing upon a vocabulary of forms with which he was so thoroughly
familiar that he seldom needed to stop to make a conscious choice.
The result was a mask which, like most of those that are carved today,
was well within the limits of the Iroquois style. This conservatism
combined with the apparent lack of a carefully worked out plan can
best be attributed to the fact that the patterns of art are largely
unconscious and that the carvers fail to realize how deeply they have
been conditioned to the traditional forms which, with some modi-
fications, they invariably repeat.
When questioned specifically as to where they obtained their ideas
or designs for masks, each carver mentioned at least one of the three
sources from which their knowledge of the traditional forms is de-
rived—the mythology, the literature, or the old masks. Lee Thomas
said that he sometimes made his carvings in accordance with the
origin legend, depicting the twisted mouth and broken nose of the
first False Face. Allison cited the illustrations and descriptions of
masks in the publications of Wissler, Beauchamp, Speck, and Fenton
which are kept in the Hodo’wi room of the community center. The
Antrop. fap. IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 395
others, while they denied using pictures, acknowledged the influence
of the old masks, both those on the reservation and those they have
seen in museums. Several said they had visited the collections in
Syracuse and Albany for the express purpose of ‘‘getting ideas,’ and
one man admitted that he had once made an exact copy of a mask in
a museum, although he “didn’t think much of it” after it was finished.
Most of the men regard the old carvings simply as a source of inspira-
tion rather than as models. ‘‘I just like to look at them. Makes me
want to carve.”
It is worth noting that none of the carvers spoke of dreams or visions
of the Hodo’wi which Fenton has reported dictate the formal treat-
ment of the masks. While it may be that my informants do carve
according to dreams and deliberately withheld this information, Pete
Hest, who seems to have their confidence, is familiar with what he
calls ‘‘the Fenton theory” and told me that it is ‘‘ridiculous.”’
Certain practical considerations may enter in as a limiting, though
not a determining, factor in design. One man pointed out that since
the vision of the dancers is greatly restricted by masks (‘‘hard to see
while dancing except just a small bit in front’’), there is much bumping
and jostling during the course of the rituals. This means that masks
with long sharp noses, while they may be considered artistically
effective, are regarded with disfavor from the standpoint of comfort
and safety.
All the sources of design cited by the carvers—the mythology, the
literature, and the old masks—encourage the retention of the tra-
ditional patterns and stabilize the style. To a degree, the Indians
recognize and accept their dependence on these sources, since for
them tradition is a positive value and they feel that they should
produce carvings which are typically Iroquois. At the same time,
however, they minimize the extent to which they rely upon models,
either masks or pictures of masks, and stress the necessity of imagi-
nation and originality. “Sometimes I look at old masks but carving
is mostly a matter of imagination’’; ‘‘I never copy; I get my ideas out
of my own head”’; “I use my own ideas because I like to be original’;
“T just start thinking about masks and get an idea.”
There can be little doubt that the carvers really do believe that their
ideas come from their own heads. Nor do they see the contradiction
between their statements to this effect and their efforts at conformity
to Iroquois style, a fact which was strikingly illustrated when Allison
Thomas told me he never copied old masks and then proceeded to
describe an antique false face he had seen at the Allegany Reservation
and which he intends to reproduce as accurately as he can from the
detailed sketches he has made of it.
I can only interpret the discrepancy between words and actions
396 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
as further evidence that the patterns of art operate, in part, below
the level of consciousness. There is, however, another contradiction
which cannot be explained solely in terms of unconscious processes
since it is verbalized by the carvers. On the one hand they assert
their originality and independence (‘‘I use my own ideas”’), and on the
other they admit that they sometimes use models (“I get ideas from
looking at old masks’’). Here it seems necessary to assume that there
is, in their eyes, some sort of an equation between being original and
being Iroquois, perhaps even a belief that the first value follows
naturally from the second and is dependent upon it. Such an equa-
tion, if it does exist, is reinforced when the carvers derive traditional
designs from sources which appear to them to be completely novel, as
in the case of Floyd Doctor who said that he had once gotten a ‘‘new
idea”? from an advertisement on a billboard. Because the picture
was that of a man smoking, and closely resembled the blowing or
whistling type of false face, he was able to reinterpret the new forms
in terms of the old and produce a conventional Iroquois mask.
Another carver claimed to have made a “different kind” of mouth by
exploiting the fact that the piece of wood he chose had a branch on it
which he could utilize for this feature. Again the result was a blow-
lip mask (pl. 97, 6). This process of reading-in allows the carver to
fulfill without conflict the two apparently contradictory conceptions
which he has of himself; that of the artist who is original, who in-
novates, who follows his own ideas, and that of the Indian who adheres”
with only slight deviations to the traditional patterns.
STANDARDS OF TASTE
Some generalizations can be made about the particular qualities
or characteristics which, in the opinion of the Onondaga, constitute
a good or successful mask. They are derived from my appraisal of
the masks which are carved today (pls. 94-99), from the comments of
the carvers and others about the appearance of the masks, and from
the reactions of a small group of Onondagas to a series of photographs
which included both Iroquois and “foreign’’ masks, the latter chiefly
those of the Northwest Coast Indians. The information obtained
from these three sources suggests some of the criteria which determine
the stylistic elements of the carvings and which serve as a basis for
critical and appreciative judgments.
To a western observer the most striking characteristic of contem-
porary Onondaga carvings is their conformity to the traditional
Iroquois style. With few exceptions, the masks which I saw, and
which I believe to be representative of the work of the modern carver,
esemble the conventional types described and classified by Fenton
Anthrop: fap. IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 397
from a study of museum collections.”2 Some deviation from these
types is evident, but it results from the modification or exaggeration
of the old forms rather than from the invention of new ones. The
spoon-lipped masks of Kenneth Thomas on which, in contrast to
older specimens of this type, the spoons are smaller and the lower lip
is elongated to form the chin (pls. 94, a, and 94, c), or the unusually
enlarged and flared mouth on the blowing mask carved by Elijah Hill
(pl. 98, a) are examples of such changes. The use of white paint to
accentuate the eyes, the brows, the cheekbones, and the teeth may
be considered another minor innovation since the ancient masks
were painted a solid color. Yet this too is an elaboration, not an
alteration, of the features and is quite consistent with the traditional
treatment of the carvings which aimed at achieving a dramatic and
striking effect.
Only two masks seem to me to be approaching the limits of Iroquois
style. One of these, shaped like a skull with large, round eyes and
bared teeth, resembles a death’s head and has no precedent that I
know of (pl. 98, c). The other is crudely executed with no detail or
refinement of the forms, which suggests that its un-Iroquois appear-
ance is due more to a lack of skill on the part of the artist than to a
deliberate attempt to deviate from the conventional patterns (pl. 99,
top).
Within the limitations imposed by the standard of traditionalism,
there is considerable variation. Because each mask is made up of a
number of independent elements—the shape of the face, the eyes,
the nose, and the mouth, the proportioning of these features, and the
treatment of details—different effects can be produced through
different combinations of the same basic forms. Thus two masks
with identical mouths may be quite dissimilar owing to the variations
in the other features (cf. pl. 95, 6, with pl. 95, c), while a difference in
the mouth type and the amount of surface embellishments may serve to
differentiate carvings which in other respects are essentially similar,
(cf. pl. 94, c, with pl. 95, 6, in which the outline of the face, the eyes, and
the nose forms are much the same). These differences, taken in con-
junction with the statements of the carvers that they like to follow
their own ideas, indicate the presence of another standard: that of
uniqueness or individuality. In the majority of carvings this
second standard is subordinated to the first, since individuality is
achieved by the use of the old forms and remains within the limits of
the established style.
The fact that in some of the masks the formal elements are de-
veloped beyond the requirements of traditionalism and individual-
22 Although I was told by several carvers that the Onondaga do not classify their masks at all, I have
used Fenton’s criteria and distinguished them according to mouth types.
682-611—64 31
398 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
ity, suggests the possibility of technical excellence as a third standard.
The quality to which this standard refers is not a specific characteris-
tic but rather a way of handling the forms. It can be summed up
in the word ‘“‘finished’”’ as opposed to ‘‘crude,” as it requires a
precise delineation of the large forms, a breaking down of these
forms into smaller ones, an emphasis on detail, and an elaboration
and refinement of the surface. Technical excellence is evident in
the carvings of James Homer, Eddie Schenandoah, and Kenneth
Thomas, particularly in the latter’s spoon-lipped masks which are
probably the most difficult type to execute successfully. Whether
this standard is considered important by the other carvers but not
attained because they lack the necessary skill, or whether there is a
contrasting standard which prescribes a simpler, less finished treat-
ment of masks, it is impossible to determine simply from an examina-
tion of their work.
The Onondaga make relatively few comments or evaluations about
the appearance of their masks, at least to an outsider. One of the
carvers, comparing the ancient masks with the modern, said that in
his opinion, ‘‘We do finer work now than they did in the past,”
while another told me that he didn’t think much of the masks carved
today because they look too much like Halloween false faces. Still
another declared that some masks are better than others, but did
not specify which one or explain why. Only two carvers passed
judgment on their own work. Kenneth Thomas said that every
mask he did was an improvement over the last because he always
thought of some way to make it better. Eddie Schenandoah admitted
that although he tried to make the next one better, it never turned
out quite as he had hoped. Neither of these men, however, was
explicit as to the meaning he attached to “‘better.”’
Several carvers made general statements which indicate a prefer-
ence for the traditional forms: masks should look old, they should
look “Indian,” they should be carved according to the origin legend
because ‘‘that’s the way the old fellows used to make them.”” Much
more frequently verbalized is the value placed upon individuality.
In referring to their own work, most of my informants tended to
minimize the similarities between the carvings and to emphasize the
differences. ‘‘We all like to make them our own way’; ‘“‘We make
each one different’’; ‘“‘The theme song of the Onondagas could be
‘To Each His Own.’ ”’ Lee Thomas amplified his claim to individual-
ity by pointing out that his masks could always be recognized by
their wide mouths. The carvers also believe that whereas the Seneca
carve only certain types of false faces, the Onondaga make all kinds
and have a greater range of types than any of the other Iroquois
tribes. Actually there is as much, if not more, variation among
Anthrop Pap. TROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 399
the Seneca, since Fenton found formal types on their reservations
which I did not observe at Onondaga (e.g., tongue-protruding, hanging-
mouth, and divided masks).
By asking each of my informants to choose from a series of eight
photographs of Iroquois masks the one which he liked the best and
to give reasons for his choice, I was able to cross-check on generaliza-
tions derived from the other two sources and to obtain more explicit
information as to the criteria by which the carvings are judged.
Twenty persons were interviewed; fourteen men, of whom ten were
carvers, and six women. In discussing the statements of these in-
dividuals, I have focused on the differences between the carvers
and ‘‘the rest of the community” as represented by the other 10
informants.
The photographs that I used are those of masks owned by the
American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Only two
of them are dated and identified as to tribe, but they are all traditional
Iroquois types. They include three crooked-mouth masks, three
tongue-protruding, one straight-lipped and one husk-face (pls. 100-
103). Since I interviewed my informants separately, their reactions
to the pictures may be considered independent in that, at the time they
were looking at them, they were not influenced by the comments or
opinions of anyone else.
There was almost complete agreement among the Indians as to
which photographs they preferred. One or the other, or both, of two
pictures was judged to be the best by 18 out of 20 people. The one
chosen by the majority (7 carvers and 8 noncarvers) depicts a crooked-
mouth mask with a broken nose and many wrinkles (pl. 100, a). This
type is most common among all the Iroquois tribes and apparently
carries the greatest prestige, for it represents the first False Face as he
is described in the origin legend. The picture which ranked second
is that of a mask which displays to a marked degree the quality I have
labeled technical excellence (pl. 100, 6). It was judged best or was
preferred along with plate 100, a, by seven persons, six of whom are
carvers.
While the choices made by my informants seem to indicate a uni-
formity in the taste standards of the group, the explanations which
accompanied these choices were remarkably diverse. Nor was there
any particular correspondence between the choices and the verbal-
izations about them, since different reasons were offered for selecting
the same picture and, conversely, different pictures were selected for
the same reason. Many people gave more than one reason, and only
one man was not able to explain his choice.
A number of the Onondagas considered antiquity to be the most
important criterion. ‘The oldest masks are best.’”? ‘What makes
400 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
them good is that they’re old; I don’t like the shiny new ones.”
Others justified their preferences in terms of the origin legend, stating
that masks which represent the first False Face are the ‘most real,”
“the most natural.’’ Still others asserted that masks should be
“fierce looking,” ‘‘weird,’’ ‘‘scary,”’ and one man amplified his state-
ment in a way which suggests that this criterion is related to the
Indians’ conception of the function of the carvings. ‘The idea of a
mask is to have fright in it. They should be as frightful as possible
because they’re supposed to chase away the evil spirits.”’
A few people said that their preferences were based on originality.
“A really original way of making’; ‘Somebody had a pretty good
imagination on that one.’? Much more frequently verbalized, how-
ever, was the recognition that preference is likely to be the result of
familiarity. “I like it best because it looks something like a mask
I once had.” “I’ve seen some that were similar.” “It’s most like
our type, like the masks we use around here.’”’ Sometimes familiarity
was combined with a sense of tribal pride at the supposed rarity of the
mask outside of Onondaga. ‘‘I’ll bet they don’t have any like this on
the other reservations. We have some like it around here though.”
Pictures were often rejected because they did not “look Iroquois.”
In commenting on the photographs which they had selected as best,
many of my informants expressed their admiration for the workman-
ship of the carvings and the technical skill of the carvers. ‘It’s got
the best carving.” “It has lots of work on it.” ‘“They sure used good
tools when they worked on that one.’”’ Pictures which were not liked
were judged to be too plain, too simple, too crude. ‘It doesn’t require
much carving; could be made in a day.”
The material which I obtained through the use of photographs
essentially substantiates the generalizations derived from other
sources. Both carvers and noncarvers consider as ‘‘best’’ those com-
binations of forms (i.e. crooked-mouth masks) with which they are
most familiar; which are, in their opinion, the oldest, and therefore
the most typically Iroquois. The representative function or meaning
of the carvings also enters into their evaluations, for they prefer the
mask which tells the story of the first False Face and does not merely
symbolize, but literally depicts, his characteristics. Originality, as we
define it, is rarely operative and then only within the limits of the
traditional style. The taste of the Onondaga is narrower than
some of their statements would seem to imply.
Insofar as there is a difference between the standards of the carvers
and the rest of the community, it is one of degree, not kind. While
it is true that a greater proportion of carvers chose plate 100, 6, a mask
which I consider to be more detailed and finished than those shown
in the other plates, my informants may not have seen these qualities
am oP47 *P ~IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 401
nor made their selections because of them. However, whether they
chose plate 100, a, or plate 100, 6, the carvers seemed to be more con-
cerned with technical characteristics (‘lots of work,” ‘used good
tools’’), whereas the noncarvers tended to emphasize the referential
characteristics, the ideas and emotions associated with the masks.
The women in particular described the masks as gruesome, awful,
horrible; usually with the implication that this was the effect which
ought to be produced. ‘The more hideous, the better.’’ Yet some
noncarvers seemed to make their judgments on the basis of technique,
while many carvers mentioned antiquity, fierceness, etc.
The foreign pictures which I used included eight Northwest Coast
masks that represented a wide range of types, four Chinese masks,
two Hopi, and one Eskimo. Although I did not ask my informants to
compare these pictures with those of Iroquois carvings, many did so.
“There’s a lot of difference.” ‘You notice the difference between
east and west.’”? Frequently comparisons were evaluative. ‘Ours
are more interestingly carved”; ‘“There’s nothing to these’’; ‘“They’re
so plain.”” One person, referring to the Northwest Coast masks, re-
marked, ‘‘All these look alike. Ours have more variety.” Clearly,
judgments about the variability within a given style depend upon the
perspective of the observer. To an individual within the culture,
differences loom large; to an outsider they are minimal. Another
informant, with unusual insight, recognized one of the principal
reasons why the familiar forms exert a greater appeal than the un-
familiar. ‘I like ours better even if they are hideous. I guess it’s
because I’m used to seeing them.”
Some people rejected the foreign masks completely. “I don’t
like any of them”; ‘“They don’t look like masks.” Others found
them interesting, comical, or odd, and a few were frankly bewildered.
“YT suppose they mean something to the people who use them, but
they’re way beyond us.’’ On the whole the carvers were more recep-
tive than the other Onondagas, inquiring about the materials and the
tools, and commenting favorably on the technique. ‘‘Nice carving’;
“They do pretty good.”” One man was quite taken with the Eskimo
mask, saying that although he considered it unfinished, he would try
to keep it in his mind and make one like it.
There was little agreement as to which were the best of the foreign
carvings. Seven different pictures were selected and no one of them
was preferred by more than four people, in contrast to the agreement
about the Iroquois pictures. The Onondaga react in a similar manner
to their own carvings because the culture has prescribed the standards
for an Iroquois mask. ‘They have not, however, learned any positive
responses to foreign arts so that, in a sense, each person is left free
to choose as he pleases. Although, as might be expected, there was
402 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
a tendency to look for similarities to the Iroquois style, the carvings
that were considered to fulfill these criteria differed widely. This
does not imply that the choices made by my informants were haphazard,
but simply that they were idiosyncratic; the factors which determined
them must be sought in the area of personality rather than culture.
One final point may be raised. Do the Onondaga react to masks,
either their own or those of other Indian tribes, in a way which we
would recognize as esthetic; that is, do they react to the form as
well as the content or meaning of the carvings? I believe that
there is a concern with form for its own sake which some people do
not verbalize, or perhaps even conceptualize, and which others ex-
press in terms of the standard of technical excellence (‘It’s got good
carving’). It would seem that the Onondaga do not possess in
their English vocabularies such words as ‘composition,’ “propor-
tion,” or ‘‘balance’”’ with which to discuss the formal characteristics
of the masks.** Yet there is no reason to suppose that they do not
respond to these characteristics and that when they say they prefer
a particular carving ‘‘because it is like the one in the legend,” they
may not also be expressing their appreciation of form in the only
terms they have at their disposal. In this connection it is significant
that there were among the series of Iroquois pictures three crooked-
mouth masks which presumably have the same associations and sym-
bolize the same supernatural being. One, however, was singled out
as best (pl. 100, a@), while the others were passed over with little or no
comment (pl. 101). The difficulty, and perhaps impossibility, of
isolating the esthetic response results from the fact that it is rarely
explicity stated and is always closely associated with other factors
such as tribal pride, the value placed upon antiquity, and the repre-
sentative function of the carvings.
An esthetic response does not depend upon the existence of an
abstract concept of art. The carvers are not regarded, either by
themselves or by the rest of the community, as artists but rather as
members of the False Face Society. Consistent with the way in
which the carvers are perceived is the disposition to view masks
always within their ritualistic context. In appraising the photo-
graphs, many of my informants remarked, usually with disapproval,
that the Iroquois masks had no bags of tobacco attached to them.
They also questioned me about the symbolism of the foreign carvings
and inquired about the ceremonies in which they are used, apparently
taking it for granted that any mask has meaning and serves a specif-
ic purpose. Evidently the Onondaga have not assimilated the west-
ern conception of art as a thing in itself, a class of objects which have
23 While it is probable that the native language also lacks an ‘‘esthetic vocabulary,’”’ there is nothing in
the literature concerning this point.
Amo fay» «IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 403
some quality in common apart from their meaning and their function
in the culture.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
An examination of mask carving as it exists today on the Onondaga
Reservation has led to the conclusion that the retention of this ancient
art is a nativistic reaction to the pressures of acculturation. Nativism
need not imply a large-scale, organized movement involving the whole
society; rather it may be defined as a self-conscious attempt on the
part of some individuals to identify with the aboriginal way of life.
Linton (1948, pp. 230-231) has pointed out that nativism is the
perpetuation or revival not of whole cultures but of certain current or
remembered elements of them which are selected for emphasis and
given symbolic value. ‘The more distinctive such elements are with
respect to other cultures with which the society is in contact, the
greater their potential value as symbols of the society’s unique charac-
ter.” Mask carving satisfies the requirement of distinctiveness, for
False Faces have been a prominent feature of Iroquois society for at
least 400 years, and quite possibly longer.
Since masks are still looked upon as ceremonial properties and
continue to be an integral part of the rituals of the False Face Society,
it may be argued that the perpetuation of the medicine society ade-
quately accounts for the retention of carving. Aside from the fact
that this explanation solves one problem only to raise another, it is
equally plausible to assume that masks have been the crucial factor
in the survival of the Society because they have served as striking and
concrete reminders of its mythological concepts and its rituals.
Moreover, it is precisely in this religious aspect of maskmaking that
change seems to have occurred. Although the data do not permit,
a final judgment, it was my impression that while the religious forms
have been preserved, the religious beliefs of many of the individuals
who carry out these forms have faded and, in some cases, disappeared
completely.
There are, on the other hand, fairly substantial data to support the
hypothesis that a conscious desire to perpetuate the aboriginal pat-
terns is the primary reason why masks are made and used today.
Briefly restated, the evidence is as follows:
(1) The dependence upon the ethnographic literature as a source of
information about masks and their rituals and as a source of design.
(2) The deference accorded Pete Hest who, although a White man,
has been accepted into the False Face Society and is respected as
an authority on the old customs.
(3) The class in Indian lore which encourages carving, and which is
under the guidance of Hest and was apparently initiated by him.
404 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
(4) The fact that many of my informants were willing to reveal
information of a supposedly sacred nature to a stranger, a willing-
ness which I have interpreted to be an attempt to prove themselves
authentic Indians and to fulfill the expectations of the White visitor.
It seems evident that whether or not the masks have lost their
old meaning, they have acquired a new one and now function as
symbols of the old Iroquois culture and its values. Under these
conditions it is not surprising that the style of the false faces has
remained stable. Although changes in the direction of diversity and
greater elaboration have undoubtedly occurred in the past, today
the emphasis placed upon antic uity and tradition inhibits the virtuosity
of the artist; his tendency to play with technique and devise new forms.
Sometimes deliberately, sometimes unconsciously, the carvers repeat
the old forms with the result that modern masks are essentially
similar to those described by missionaries and travelers over 200 years
ago.
It cannot be asserted that nativism constitutes the only incentive
for the retention of masks and the rituals associated with them.
Religious conviction, particularly on the part of the older men, cannot
be entirely ruled out, and it is very probable that for some of the
Onondagas carving offers a socially accepted means of satisfying
creative impulses. Nor should the psychological effects of masking
be overlooked: the drama that is provided for the spectator, and the
emotional release felt by the wearer who is able to relinquish his
identity and express himself more freely.
The explanations advanced for the retention of mask carving at
Onondaga are not necessarily applicable to other Iroquois since the
differences between reservations limit generalizations about any
aspect of contemporary culture. Each reservation is unique in the
degree and type of acculturation it has undergone, and this, in turn,
is dependent upon the interrelation of such factors as the geographical
position, the size of the population, and the particular facets of
western culture to which the group has been exposed. St. Regis
Reservation, for example, has a larger population than Onondaga
and is located on the Canadian border between New York State and
the Province of Quebec, far removed from any large city. Yet
these conditions, which one might suppose would encourage the sur-
vival of the aboriginal culture, are apparently offset by the influence
of the Catholic church. Eighty percent of the Indians are Catholic
and many of the native religious patterns, including the use and
making of false faces, have died out.
Precisely because of the differences, Iroquois reservations afford an
*4 Lincoln White, a resident of St. Regis, kindly supplied me with the information pertaining to this
reservation.
Am ba] 7? ~=IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 405
excellent opportunity for comparative research, as the same tradi-
tional art can be investigated in a variety of sociocultural settings.
A comparison of Onondaga with Cattaraugus Reservation, which
approximates St. Regis in its population size and relatively isolated
location, but differs in being less acculturated, might reveal more
clearly the conditions which promote or hinder the commercializa-
tion of masks. Is it, as has been suggested, proximity to a large
city which provides a more secure and profitable means of subsistence
than the handicrafts, or are there other, more important, determinants?
What is the effect of commercialization upon style? Fenton has re-
ported the development of new types of masks at Cattaraugus and
Tonawanda which may be a response to the demands of the tourist
market. At Onondaga, however, any outside pressure upon the style
seems to be of a sort that restricts innovation, because it is assumed
that White buyers want false faces that “look Indian.” For problems
of this kind, comparative studies are essential. At the same time, the
underlying unity of behavior and values that constitutes Iroquois
culture regardless of reservation differences makes it reasonable to
suspect that a conscious wish to preserve Indian identity plays a part
in maskmaking wherever it survives among these people.
There remains the broader question of the extent to which retentions
in language, government, and religion, other than the False Face
Society, are nativistic in character. Again, no definitive answer is
possible as fieldwork at Onondaga was too brief to permit an analysis
of the total community. Recent developments in Iroquois culture,
however, suggest that further research would have revealed the answer
to be an affirmative one. In his series of articles, Edmund Wilson
(1960) describes what he calls a nationalistic movement taking place
on all Iroquois reservations in response to increasing pressure from
White society over the last 2 years. On the economic and political
level the movement involves resistance to encroachments on reserva-
tion lands and bitter battles in the courts over what the Indians regard
as abrogation of their legal rights as a sovereign people. Accompany-
ing this resistence is a reawakening of pride in the Iroquois past which is
leading to a revival of the spirit of the League and a new interest in
the Longhouse religion. At Allegany there is even talk among the
more extreme nationalists of bringing back the White Dog ceremony,
and among the young men of St. Regis, the fashion of wearing “scalp-
locks” has been revived as a _ sign of Iroquois patriotism.
No such large-scale or dramatic revitalization movement was evi-
dent at Onondaga in 1950, but there were indications of a need for
self-identification and an effort to find it in traditional symbols. The
maskmakers exemplified these characteristics, and it has been pointed
out that people who orient toward the old cultural forms in one
406 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
area of life tend to do so in others. Carvers are non-Christians who
belong to the Council House and have some connection with native
politics. They are also, when contrasted with the more acculturated
portion of the population, of a lower and less secure economic status.
When put in this broader perspective, mask carving appears to be but
one of the ways in which the Onondaga seek to escape from their
position as an underprivileged minority by an attempt to return to an
idealized past. To an observer from outside the culture, carving is
a particularly appropriate way since it is an ancient Iroquois custom.
The attitude of the Indians themselves toward the art is best summed
up in their own words: ‘All Indians carve.”
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ADAIR, JOHN.
1944. The Navajo and Pueblo silversmiths. Univ. Oklahoma Press,
Norman.
Apam, LEONHARD.
1940. Primitive art. Middlesex, England.
BARTRAM, JOHN.
1751. Observations on the inhabitants, climate, soil, rivers, productions,
and other matters worthy of notice. London.
BreaucHamp, Wim.1aAM M.
The Stone Age in Onondaga County. MS., Cornell Univ. library.
1885. New York.
1888. Onondaga customs. Journ. Amer. Folklore, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 195-203.
1905 a. Aboriginal use of wood in New York. New York State Mus.
Bull. 90, Archeol. 11, pp. 87-272.
1905 b. A history of the New York Iroquois, now commonly called the Six
Nations. New York State Mus. Bull. 78, Archeol. 9, pp. 125-
410.
Boas, FRANz.
1927. Primitive art. Oslo. (Reprinted in 1955, New York.)
BunzeEu, Ruta.
1929. The Pueblo pottery; a study of creative imagination in primitive art.
Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
1938. Primitive art. Jn ‘General Anthropology,” Franz Boas, ed., pp.
535-588. Boston.
ConvERSE, Harrier M.
1908. Myths and legends of the New York State Iroquois. Foreword by
and ed. by Arthur C. Parker. New York State Mus. Bull. 125.
Dati, Witi1am H.
1884. On masks, labrets, and certain aboriginal customs. 3d Ann. Rep.
Bur. Ethnol. for 1881-1882, pp. 67-202.
DEWEY, JOHN.
1934. Art as experience. New York.
oD} {2 ~IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 407
Dove.as, FrepERIc H.
1930. Iroquois long house. Denver Art Mus., Dept Indian Art, Leaflet
No. 12.
1931 a. Iroquois foods. Denver Art Mus., Dept. Indian Art, Leaflet
No. 26.
1931 b. Iroquoian and Algonkian wampum. Denver Art Mus., Dept.
Indian Art, Leaflet No. 31.
1934 a. Symbolism in Indian art. Denver Art Mus., Dept. Indian Art,
Leaflet No. 61.
1934 b. Design areas in Indian art. Denver Art Mus., Dept. Indian Art,
Leaflet No. 62.
1935. Types of Indian masks. Denver Art Mus., Dept. Indian Art, Leaflet
Nos. 65-66.
Dove.as, Freperic H., and p’HarRNoncourt, RENE.
1941. Indian art of the United States. Mus. Modern Art, New York.
EXPposITION oF INDIAN TRIBAL Arts, INc.
1931. Introduction to American Indian art. New York.
Fenton, WituiaM N.
1937. Seneca society of false faces. Scien. Monthly, vol. 44, pp. 215-238.
1940 a. Problems arising from the historic northeastern position of the
Iroquois. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 100, pp. 159-251.
1940 b. Museum and field studies of Iroquois masks and ritualism. Explor.
and Field-work of the Smithsonian Inst. in 1940, pp. 95-100.
1941. Masked medicine societies of the Iroquois. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian
Inst. for 1940, pp. 397-439.
1956. Some questions of classification, typology, and style raised by Iro-
quois masks. Trans. New York Acad. Sci., ser. 2, vol. 18, No. 4,
pp. 347-357.
Fenton, Wiiu1aM N., Epiror.
1951. Symposium on local diversity in Iroquois culture. Bur. Amer.
Ethnol. Bull. 149.
GARFIELD, VIOLA.
1950. The Tsimshian and their neighbors. Amer. Ethnol. Publ., vol. 18,
pp. 1-70.
GOLDENWEISER, A. A.
1922. The Iroquois matriarchate. In “Early Civilizations,’ pp. 70-82.
New York.
Harrincton, M. R.
1909. Some unusual Iroquois specimens. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 11,
No. 1, pp. 85-91.
Herskovits, MELVILLE J.
1948. The aesthetic drive: graphic and plastic arts. Jn ‘“‘Man and His
Works,” pp. 378-413. New York.
Hunt, Grorce T.
1940. The wars of the Iroquois; a study in intertribal trade relations.
Univ. Wisconsin Press. Madison.
KEPPLER, JOSEPH.
1941. Comments on certain Iroquois masks. Mus. Amer. Indian, Heye
Foundation, Contr., vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1-40.
KROEBER, ALFRED.
1947. Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Univ. Cali-
fornia Press, Berkeley.
408 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 191
Linton, RaAwpu.
1943. Nativistic movements. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 45, No. 2, pp.
230-240.
Lyrorp, CARRIE.
1945. Iroquois crafts. U.S. Indian Service, Indian Handicrafts No. 6.
Matraux, ANDRE.
1949-50. The psychology of art. Trans. by Stuart Gilbert. Pantheon
Books, New York.
Morgan, Lewis H.
1851. The league of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee or Iroquois. Rochester.
Murpock, GreorceE P.
1934. The Iroquois of northern New York State. Jn “Our Primitive
Contemporaries,” pp. 291-323. New York.
PARKER, ARTHUR C.
1909. Secret medicine societies of the Seneca. Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol.
11, No. 2, pp. 161-185.
1912. Certain Iroquois tree myths and symbols. Amer. Anthrop., n.s.,
vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 608-620.
1913. The code of Handsome Lake, the Seneca prophet. New York State
Mus. Bull. 163.
1920. Archeological history of New York. New York State Mus. Bull.
Nos. 235-238.
QuaIn, B. H.
1937. Iroquois. Jn ‘‘Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive
Peoples,”’ ed. by Margaret Mead, pp. 240-281. New York.
RircHie, Wiiii1aM A.
1952. The chance horizon, an early stage of Mohawk Indian cultural
development. New York State Mus. Cire. No. 29.
1961. Iroquois archeology and settlement patterns. Jn “Symposium on
Cherokee and Iroquois Culture,” ed. by William N. Fenton
and John Gulick. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 180, pp. 25-38.
SKINNER, ALANSON.
1925. Some Seneca masks and their uses. Mus. Amer. Indian, Heye
Foundation, Indian Notes, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 191-207.
Smiru, DE Cost.
1888. Witchcraft and demonism of the modern Iroquois. Journ. Amer.
Folklore, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 184-194.
1889. Additional notes on Onondaga witchcraft and Ho®-do’-!. Journ.
Amer. Folklore, vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 277-281.
Speck, FRANK G.
1923. Algonkian influence upon Iroquois social organization. Amer.
Anthrop., n.s., vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 219-227.
1925. Northern elements in Iroquois and New England art. Mus. Amer.
Indian, Heye Foundation, Indian Notes, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
1945. The Iroquois: a study in cultural evolution. Cranbrook Inst. Sci.,
Bull. 23.
1950. Concerning iconology and the masking complex in eastern North
America. Univ. Pennsylvania Mus. Bull., vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 6-57.
VAILLANT, GEORGE C.
1939. Indian arts in North America. New York.
VoGeEt, FRED.
1951. Acculturation at Caughnawaga: A note on the native-modified group.
Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 220-231.
gna ead sivas IROQUOIS MASKS AT ONONDAGA—HENDRY 409
WALLACE, Paut A.
1946. The white roots of peace. Univ. Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Witson, EDMUND.
1960. Apologies to the Iroquois. New York.
Witson, J. G.
1896. Arent van Curler and his journal of 1634-35. Ann. Rep. Amer.
Hist. Assoc. for 1895, pp. 81-101.
WISSLER, CLARK.
1928. The lore of the demon mask. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Nat. Hist.,
vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 339-352.
Wray, C. F.
1956. Archaeological evidence of the mask among the Seneca. New York
State Archaeol. Assoc. Bull. No. 7, pp. 7-8.
682—611—64——32
‘ou
i
roy
it
a a “s
1y Wav,
F nay ae © La ij wt he rath Ps
© of a4
1G #4!
BE-FE0E t
ee JOLT? au SUer wor some
Yo Lacrot ahi bo
«hy +
» ae < }44 oan. 2 Od! iy sure A
, y
ioe ¥ To fou Peoria " ! a
al
pe
tt ito Smead oa
a
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 91
Top and center, Onondaga Reservation Council House. Bottom, Community center,
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 92
+
ere g : yuk ‘|
Weidtaa i taal
Onondaga Reservation maskmakers,
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 191 PLATE 93
Onondaga Reservation residences.
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 94
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
‘seUIOY,[, Youuay Ag ‘9
‘yeopuvrusyps sippy Ag ‘¢
SMSVIN GaddII-NOOdS
‘20191 Molpuy Aq poppe susoy fsemoyy, Ylouusy Aq ‘v
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 95
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
“TOWOL] Ted Aq seul SUT] 9)
‘yvopuvusyoS sIppy Aq Yseul surpiurg ‘g ‘yevopurusyog
SMSVIN ONITINS GNV ASVN HLONOW-CaHwAOOdO
nia
ee .
:
sippy Aq seul YANOUI-psyYool)
‘
D
BULLETIN 191 PLATE 96
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
“sewmoy Ty 99'T Aq seu YINOW-pyayool) 9
SASVIN HLNOW
EE TE TOS A thawed lasbilbg int Povey, 5
“ 2 ; (O41 Pret) } she ok, lay oti}
1. Edge Gy Murbhane aot | Peer aM
' Le
ws a) at bio avs oe
: Ay AR i. ive + Wiolload
i ’ j ot the a)
, ‘ade
ae) vat
“Tis is oe,
. vie A> ay, 10 :
¢ eoivig
. : Per OTe
, eat
(| 390) ae
: yl a
‘ ha ; it i
i
# ba : ibs
Cu te | Chase Rae |
ey ba?
' Bain
7h
i
i
ADEE NE ISLES MA SSOD LG ILO AG IIS TEI IEEE
0 nr aw de ltt Lo, OT td te Pk ei tee
eres » = Ee PEO oo UF OPI P IESE FOIL OR te Pt wis
= gapcacs POO Oa DIE AC EE
Aibwrevs seers
Pen T ee enue bhai blip ITH MMM Sant
TL
ih
ig
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRA
Loz
Z Le Ye, tisyepe
ELA ELCE Yi Lee CHL Yes
COG