Volume 42, Number 1 January 1971 Field Museum of Natural History \fk''-f';.J-'^^-. !f^^ fv *% « JA'<* Cover: reproduction of a specimen of tapa cloth) from A Catalogue of the Difterent Specimens of Clotti Collected \ in the Three Voyages of Captain Cook, \ to the Southern Hemisphere. BULLETIN Volume 42, Number 1 January 1971 2 The Primitive Basis of Our Calendar Van L. Johnson a study of the Roman calendar explains why our present calendar Is In Its current form 8 Tapa Cloth W. Peyton Fawcett a generous gift of a catalogue of tapa cloth specimens is described 1 0 Space Biology and the Murchison IMeteorite Dr. Edward J. Olsen a recent discovery of amino acids in meteorites is discussed 1 2 Portrait of a Naturalist-Explorer Joyce Zibro Dr. Emmet R. Blake, curator of birds, is profiled 17 New Books 18 Letters 19 Field Briefs Calendar Field Museum of Natural History Director, E. Leiand Webber Editor Joyce Zibro: Associate Editor Victoria Haider: Staff Writer Madge Jacobs; Production Russ Becker: Photograptiy John Bayalis, Fred Huysmans. The Bulletin is published monthly by Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive. Chicago, Illinois, 60605. Subscrip- tions: $9 a year: $3 a year for sctiools. Members of the Museum subscribe througti Museum membership. Opinions expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policy of Field Museum. Unsolicited manuscripts are welcome. Printed by Field Museum Press. Application to mail at Second-class postage rates is pending at Chicago, Illinois. Postmaster: Please send form 3579 to Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605. Bulletin January 1971 The Primitive Basis of Our Calendar Van L Johnson Bulletin January 1971 Why does the year begin on January first? Why are there twelve months in a year and why is the twelfth month December when its very name means "tenth month"? Why does a week have seven days, a day twenty-four hours, an hour sixty minutes? A study of the Roman calendar can lead to answers to questions like these and uncovers the primitive basis of our calendar, an institution that has become a silent dictator of our life's pace in so-called civilized times. We are still using the Roman calendar except for minor changes made after Caesar's reform in 45 B.C. This is rather remarkable considering the revolutionary changes made in the calendar up to Caesar's time. A study of the origins of our calendar faces the obstacle that the Roman calendar was not published until 304 B.C. and the oldest extant calendar, that of Antium, goes back only to sometime in the early first century B.C. However, evidence for the primitive calendar does exist, for the Roman calendar was basically a list of festivals, anniversaries and annotations which included matter of great antiquity. Also, the Romans, great conservatives especially in their religious concerns, often preserved what they no longer understood and primitive elements persisted — thanks to this conservatism — in most of the great festivals still celebrated in Imperial times. Through a study of these obsolete factors preserved in the written calendars and the later festivals, we are able to reconstruct the earlier history of the calendar and to form some notion about what lies hidden in the prehistoric darkness from which the calendar emerged. In research of this kind, complete certainty is usually impossible, but I believe that I have found a major clue to the solution of many perplexing problems: namely, an unrecorded four-month year. A study of the nundinal This is a Iragment ot the calendar of Praeneste lor the beginning ot Inarch. Fragments ol this calendar have been coming to light since the litteenth century. or Roman weekday system first led me to assume the existence in primitive times of this four-month year. Yet its existence can be detected quite simply in our present names for the months: December, our twelfth month, really means "the tenth month," and this count goes back in an orderly way to September, our ninth month, which really means the "seventh month." We know too that August and July, our eighth and seventh months, were originally the "sixth" and "fifth" months (Sextilis and Quintilis) renamed in honor of Augustus and Julius Caesar in their own lifetime. All this implies that the year once began with March, that January and February were added at some time to a ten-month calendar, and that there was an original cluster of four named months — March, April, May and June — to which six numbered months were added to form the ten-month year. It appears that this cluster of four named months was actually an original four-month year. Since three four-month years would just about complete one solar year this was probably the best calendar the Romans possessed and used until Caesar's reform of the calendar in 45 B.C. For most primitive peoples, the sun measures only the day; and the moon, with its distinctive phases is the first measurement of periods beyond that. In addition, primitive people often designate market days (the days when they gathered to exchange goods) with regular intervals between them. The early Romans seem to have followed this pattern and a four-month year may be their attempt to combine a thirty-day lunation with an eight-day market-week. Their market days were called nundinae or "ninth days," but this means "eight days" by our mode of reckoning which is not inclusive like the Roman. The meshing of these two time-units — thirty and eight — could be soonest accomplished in four months of thirty days each, i.e., a year or cycle — that is what the Latin word for year, annus, seems to mean— of 120 days. This is what anthropologists call a permutation cycle — a term which means that the cycle is completed and begins again every time the two intervals in question coincide: this would have been on March first in the four-month year under discussion. However, the focal point in each month was not the Kalends as the first day, but the Ides or "Divider" which always came sixteen days before the end of the month, because half of thirty on the duodecimal system used by the Romans in computing fractions is not fifteen, but sixteen. The Ides of March was particularly prominent because March was the first month. In a thirty-day month it must have fallen on the fourteenth day of the month and on the sixth day of a Roman eight-day week. The Ides was celebrated as New Year's Day with great festivities for Anna Perenna, the "Unending Year-Cycle." Festivals like this were known as feriae, so that the Ides of March is a ferial day or, as abbreviated in Latin, an F-day. The Ides was also, I think, a nundinal or market-day, for the great fair in honor of Feronia, the market deity, would have fallen on this day in a four-month year. Moreover, all other market days were reckoned progressively from this date, so that all fell on the sixth day of a Roman week and the earliest calendar was probably simply a list of these nundinae. They were also festival or ferial days for the first recognized divinities, so that these days were labeled F. Other days of the week, if they had to be identified, were simply referred to by the remaining letters of the alphabet from A-H. Days of the month, as opposed to days of the week, were numbered, I believe, by counting up to and down from the Ides: two vestiges of this practice survive in the name "Nones" for the ninth, i.e., the eighth day before the Ides, and in the name of a festival, the Quinquatrus which seems to mean the fifth day after the Ides of March. This practice was abandoned in later calendars when the Nones and the Kalends became reference points in counting, along with the Ides. Bulletin January 1971 3 Calendar The primitive calendar was a permanent calendar, of course — something which calendar reformers are again striving for — since a new year began automatically whenever the first day of the week and the first day of the month coincided. The permanent nature of the calendar is nicely illustrated in a phrase which runs through ancient literature on the subject, the annus vertens or "turning year." Commentators have seen a reference to the turning heavens and other celestial matters; but at a primitive level, it must have meant something more recognizably physical, and I suspect that it refers to actual four-sided stone calendars with one month on each side. These were no doubt turned, perhaps on a pivot, to face the viewer as the months changed. I would think that we have relics of these in the four-sided rustic month- counters, the menologia rustics, which carried a twelve-month calendar with three months on each side. These stones — of Imperial date — have been regarded as seasonal calendars, but that is an odd seasonal arrangement of months for Italy. They are more likely an adaptation of an earlier four-month calendar. If we analyze this four-month calendar, the units it contained and the rituals it embraced, we can form a clear picture of the community it served and the economy it reflected. The eight-day market-week probably reflects the length of time it took (eight days) to process goat cheese in ancient Italy. The length of the year, 120 days, matches the gestation period of the pig. Two of the primitive month-names, April and May, I would derive from aper meaning "boar" and from maia, tRe name of a goddess which I think means "sow." Maia is certainly related to malalis, the Latin word for a gelding boar, and its derivative maiale which is still the Italian word for "pig." The quality of this sow or maia was maiestas, so after all, "majesty" turns out to be only "pigness." March and June, in myopinion, were not so named in the beginning, for there is no trace of Mars in the festivals of this primitive March; and June, if named for Juno by Latin peoples, would have been called Junonius, not Junius. The first of June was always known not as the Kalends of June but as Kalendae Fabariae, the "Kalends of the Bean" and here, I think, we have a vestige of the earlier month-name, Fabarius, the month of the "bean," a staple diet for hogs in early Italy. The month we call Marchi — because the Romans named it Martius later on when the cult of Mars was introduced — may have received its original name, Caprotinus, from a very important festival which later was attached to July and appears there in all the extant Roman calendars as Nonae Caprotinae, the Caprotine Nones. In a four-month year this would have been the Nones of what we call March. This illustrates how festivals or parts of festivals were dispersed over an ultimate twelve-month year — an important phenomenon in the study of the calendar. For example, if we identify the Caprotine Nones as originally the Nones of March, it is concurrent with some interesting rites for Vediovis, a god usually described as a youthful Jove to whom a capra was sacrificed. Capra is the root of Caprotina and in developed Latin means "goat," so Nonae Caprotinae is usually translated "Nones of the Goat." But we can go even further than this, for capra is the cognate of a Greek word kapros which means either "sow" or "boar" and accounts perhaps for the name of the island of Capri — irreverent thought! Since both words are also related to Latin aper (boar), with a "k" prefix, it is probable that capra in Latin originally referred to a sow and not to a she-goat. Therefore the month of Caprotinus is another month named for the pig, and all four months of the primitive contain some reference to this animal or its food. To the four original months, six months, simply numbered from five to ten — Quintilis, Sextilis, September, October, November and December — were added, tradition says, by Romulus. This new year of ten lunations, or 300 days, corresponding roughly to the gestation period in cattle and in human beings, was augmented by four days to give a multiple of eight for the total number of days in a year, 304, so that the eight-day week would still mesh with months. These four extra days were added, one each, to the months of March, May, July and October which continued throughout Roman history to have their Ides or full moon reckoned on the basis of a 31 -day month. Since the months now varied in their number of days, it was necessary to inaugurate a system of dating which indicated how many days there were in the month at hand. The Nones was made a point of reckoning, and the Kalends was introduced to "call" the Nones. When the Nones took on this new importance for dating, it was necessary to distinguish it carefully from "nundinae" a word which means exactly the same thing as Nones, "ninth days," because there was only one Nones in a month whereas there might be three or four "nundinae" in the same period. Hence the reformer was scrupulous in avoiding a nundinal Nones and later superstition confirmed his effort by suggesting that a nundinal Nones was unlucky. The force of this scruple explains why "Romulus" added a day to alternate months until he got to September; he skipped September and added a day to October because thirty-one days in September would have produced a nundinal Nones. Numa, the second king of Rome, is credited with instituting the first lunar year by adding fifty days to the calendar of Romulus. To equalize the distribution of 354 days over twelve months, he subtracted one day from each of the thirty-day months, added these to his new fifty days and divided the sum, 56, into two new months of twenty-eight days each: January and February. Since fifty-six is a multiple of eight, both January 1 and March 1 were A-days (first days of a Roman week) Bulletin January 1971 DC ^•r^' I -tr^n" DF 4 •f^ ^j:^' a^ ^ c «c BC .s/vi This is the fragmentary calendar ot Antium discovered in 1915 by the Italian scholar G. Mancini. This inscription records the oldest extant Roman calendar unearthed to date. The thirteen months is represented by a column with the abbreviations tor the name ol the month at the top, and includes the intercalary month. The first column of letters under each month indicates the eight days of the Roman weefc lettered from A to H. The second column of letters abbreviates the legal status of certain days and the abbreviated words indicate the dates ol festivals or dedications. 4 Kirn ^^'. ^^ Bulletin January 1971 Calendar in the first year of this reform; but to keep them so, since 354 is not a multiple of eight, it was necessary to add days to one week toward the end of the year. This was accomplished, I believe, by lettering three days, namely December 17-19, all as F-days. This was done by instituting the Saturnalia on December 17 and connecting its ferial functions with those of the Opalia on December 19. Thus a tradition for a three-day Saturnalia developed and we find the real origins of intercalation in this very simple device to make the year end with an H-day (the last day of a Roman week). Meanwhile, the reformer neatly contrived to leave it an open question as to when the year really began. March first was still an A-day, but so was January first. Reforms, however, can be over- ingenious and that proved to be the case with the calendar of Numa. The intercalation was immediately neglected or misunderstood or even resented (since January first had no sanctity as an A-day) and people went right on lettering December 17-19 in the normal way. This produced a nundinal Nones in January — or would have done so if new measures had not been taken. The same reformer, or a new one whom I label Numa II, found a solution by adding a day to January; thus removing the Nones from its unlucky nundinal position and giving the year 355 days, a number achieved in this simple way and not because of any superstition against even numbers (the ancient explanation). But 355 is not a multiple of eight either, so a new method of intercalation had to be devised. This consisted of adding five days to the calendar between February 23 and 24, all lettered in the normal way, but this time unnumbered. Here we have the origin of two interesting festivals, the Terminalia of February 23 and the Regiiugium of February 24, as well as the origin of intercalating at this point in the calendar. March 1 thus resumed its old sanctity as the one true New Year's Day and remained so for some purposes down to 153 B.C. During the Republic, intercalation came to be used for a different purpose: to bring the lunar year into accord with the solar year of 365 or 366 days. An intercalary month of twenty-two or twenty-three days, called Mercedonius, was added in alternate years after February 23, the day of the Terminalia, and the last five days of February were absorbed as the last five days of Mercedonius, a vestige of Numa's five unnumbered days. This device was so often neglected, however, or corrupted by priestly or political abuses that the calendar had very little relation to the sun's course when Julius Caesar and his learned adviser, Sosigenes, introduced those reforms which are still the basis of our calendar. Caesar first extended the year 46 B.C. to 445 days, thus bringing the old calendar into agreement with astronomical observations; then, on January 1, 45 B.C. he introduced a solar calendar of 365y4 days: the fourth parts were allowed to accumulate and produce a year of 366 days once every four years. To achieve the ten new days of a normal year (365 minus 355), Caesar added two days each to January, August and December, one day each to April, June, September and November; and the extra day for leap years was inserted after February 23 as February 24 repeated, i.e., bissextilis the "twice sixth-day" before the first of March. So it is we speak of a bisextile year. Caesar's calendar was eleven minutes, fourteen seconds too long, so Pope Gregory made a slight adjustment in 1582 A.D., dropping ten excessive days at once and stipulating that leap year be observed in centesimal years Bulletin January 1971 only when they are divisible by 400. These corrections were not accepted in Great Britain and the American colonies until 1752 A.D. The seven-day planetary week was not common in Rome or the West until the third century of our era although it appears to have existed alongside the Roman eight-day week in a Sabine calendar in the first century after Christ. The planetary week had its origins in the Eastern Mediterranean where Babylonian astrology, the Hebrew Sabbath-week and Egyptian astronomy combined to formulate and confirm it. The nature of the planets was first discovered in Mesopotamia where an intense interest in the heavens gave rise to the pseudo-science of astrology: the sun and moon, however, were included in a list of seven "planets" or "travelers," and the earth was omitted as being the stationary center of a geocentric universe. Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus and Mercury (to use the Latin names still current) were properly located, at least in respect to their relative distances from the earth. Pluto, Neptune and Uranus were, of course, unknown so the seven "planets" were Saturn (the outermost), Jupiter, Mars, Sol, Venus, Mercury, and Luna, in that order. The planets were conceived as moving in spheres or orbits around the earth and passing through twelve constellations or "fixed stars" which made a zodiac or "belt of animals" around the heavens, with the sun's path or ecliptic as the middle line. Since the sun travels through ail twelve signs of the zodiac in one year and remains about the same length of time in each, this system evolved something like a solar month which could be related to the equinoxes and the solstices. But in Egypt the planetary system underwent further development, as the seven planets were meshed with a twenty-four hour day: assigning Saturn to the first hour of the first day, Jupiter to the second hour, Mars to the third, etc., introduces Sol at the first hour of the second day, Luna at the first hour of the third day, and so on until each "planet" has been associated with that day of which it marks the tirst hour. Thus the seven "planets" name the seven days of the week in this order: Saturn, Sol, Luna, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus. In this sequence these seven celestial bodies still name, with minor exceptions, the seven days of our week; French preserved the Latin names while German and English translate them into the names of counterparts among Germanic deities. The day itself appears to owe its twenty-four hour division to an Egyptian arrangement which affects the Graeco- Roman world at an early period, since twelve hours of night and twelve hours of day were customary both in Greece and Rome. The twelve-hour system originated in certain "diagonal" calendars which date back to anywhere from 1800 to 1200 B.C. in Egypt. The Egyptians had a solar year of 365 days divided into twelve months of thirty days each, plus five epagomenal days. The 360 days of the twelve regular months were divided into thirty-six decades of ten days each, to each decade there was assigned a particular constellation or decan. The heliacal or dawn rising of this constellation marked the last hour of the night for a ten-day period; it was then succeeded as decan by a new constellation, and retired — so to speak — to the next-to-the-last hour of the night, and so on. Only one of these decans can be identified, Sirius, whose heliacal rising in the summer marked the inundation of the Nile. Had day and night been of equal length, 18 decans would have been visible every night: but because of twilight and the short nights of summer when Sirius rises, only twelve were visible over a ten-day period. This twelve hour division of the night was then imposed on the day, perhaps reinforcing a division of the day into ten hours plus one hour of morning twilight and one hour of evening twilight — a division which was known in Egypt as early as 1300 B.C. Our division of the hour into sixty minutes is the result of Hellenistic computations worked out o« the sexagesimal system first devised by the Babylonians about 1800 to 1600 B.C. Thus the sixty-minute hour, the twenty- four hour day, the seven-day week, the twelve-month year — all represerU centuries of development from a primitive mixture of superstition and acute observation to the system now ta4y th« Illinois Audubon Society. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. Begins February 7 26lh Chicago Intamanonal ExMMtloii of Naiura Photography featuring award-wlnnUfg photographic prints, sponsored by tfie Nature Camera Club of Chicago and Field Museum. South Lounge. Through February 28. February 7 A showing o( priza-winnlng transparandaa from the 26th Chicago International Exhibition of Nature Photography, 2:30 p.m.. James Simpson Theatre. Through February 7 A ChlM Go«a Forth, an exhibit of toys and games, looks t>eyond the superficial nature of playthings and into the influence thay may have upon a child's cultural development Hall 9. Continuing "Exploring Indian Country," Winter Journey for Children. The self-guided tour enables youngsters to see American Indians of three environments as the early explorers saw them. All boys and girts who can read and write may participate in the free program. Journey sheets are available at Museum entrances. Through February 28. John Jamas Audubon'a elephant folk), "The Birds of Amertca." on display In ttia North Lounge. A different plate from tha rare, first-edition set Is featured each day. 7Sth Araihreraary Exhibit: A Sense d Wonder, A Sense of History, A Sense of Discovery, continues indefinitely. Exciting display techniques offer a new experlertca to museum-goers. Hall 3. Maatlnga January 12, 7:45 p.m.. Nature Camera Club of Chicago January 12, 8 p.m., Chlcagoland Glkter Council January 13, 7 p.m., Chicago Ornithological Society January 13, 7:30 p.m.. Windy City Grotto — National Speleological Society January 14, 8 p.m., Chicago Mountaineering Club January 19, 7:30 p.m., Chicago Area Camera Clubs Association February 9, 7:45 p.m.. Nature Camera Club of Chicago February 9, 8 p.m., Chlcagoland Glider Council February 10, 7 p.m., Chicago Omithotoglcai Society February 10, 7:30 p.m., Windy City Grotto- National Speleological Society Field Museum's Worldwide Natural History Tours Gardens Wild flowers Birds Archaeology Congenial travel companions Interpretalions by experts The unhurried approach Travel w^ith all dimensions THE INCAS EMPIRE & DARWIN S GALAPAGOS February n-March 5. S2,807 includes S600 i22 days o! Andes, S2.457; 1 1 days ol Galaragos cruise ?. Ouilo, $1,190 — seB.i:.-::ol.) ^. ' .. - -• . ,,^g^ n Faz, Q',, chu, Ct ^n Ch.in ■ , :irquilla, O'linj.ayt.irnbo. Cuzto, LaKe Trlicaca, Tia'-.uanaco Spanish Colonial art & arcbiteclure in Colombia. Peru. Bolivia and Ecuador. TOUR ARCHAEOLOGIST: Dr. Carlos R. Margain. prominent Mexican archaeologis! and ollicer ol Mexico's Museo Naciohal do Aniropologia. specialist in Mexican and Andean archaeology ; NATURALIST with uf and -n Tcur-cJor. I l^A^^^R ON ALL TOURS. PHIL CLAR ' ildilor ol Horlicullure magazine ' -^r Garden Editor of The News, Mexico: author, "A Guide to Mexican Flora": Field Museum Natural History Tours rt-.^i AM aondi.uM^, iu riL'i^i Viuiieurn aro tax deductible. Rates are from Chicago: may be ad Irom olt.er points. Write: Field Museum Worldwide Natural History Tours Roosevelt Rd. at Lake Shore Dr. Chicago, IM. 60605 o -o p: t- \ji w M ■v3 w ^ ^ • tn O c r- a; o r •-5 as X 3= •z. z « *T7 w > H J— » P3 t- w T* t- >-. -. »— 00 W is o S2 o c: Oi t-' r^ C/V < > c- a3 o o f— VI —J ay2, Number 2 February- 197! Fiel^)(/luseum of Natural History ^r:'> •" ^w ¥£ fi mj ^m^. v'M# ^&'li£:r" BULLETIN Volume 42, Number 2 February 1971 2 Canning a Legend Patricia M. Williams a warning that man — for the second and last time — is extirpating the wild horse from North America 6 Algae Are Man's Best Friends Dr. Matthew H. Nitecki the importance of algae for life on earth 10 Scandinavia: Lands of Fjords and the IMidnight Sun Phil Clark there's something of interest in Scandinavia for every natural history traveler 13 Bool( Reviews 1 4 Letters 15 Field Briefs Calendar Cover: Two red marine algae from the Monterey Peninsula, California. The lacy Microcladia coulteri is growing on Gigartina harveyana. Illustration by Richard Roesener. Field Museum of Natural History Director, E. Leiand Webber Editor Joyce Zibro; Associate Editor Elizabeth Munger; Staff Writer Madge Jacobs; Production Russ Becker; Photography John Bayalis, Fred Huysmans. The Bulletin is published monthly by Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605. Subscrip- tions: $9 a year; $3 a year for schools. Members of the Museum subscribe through Museum membership. Opinions expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policy of Field Museum. Unsolicited manuscripts are welcome. Printed by Field Museum Press. Application to mail at second-class postages rates is pending at Chicago, Illinois. Postmaster: Please send form 3579 to Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605. Bulletin February 1971 1 v- Canning a legend Patricia M. Williams An American World War II song confidently proclaimed "We did it before and we can do it again!" With dubious distinction, man can now sing the same song about the elimination of the wild horse from North America. Some 50 million years ago in what is now the western United States the tiny, four-toed Eohippus was busily beginning that process of evolution that resulted in today's large, single-toed horse, Equus caballus. Abundant fossil remains of the horse have been unearthed from several areas in the west, especially in Texas and Wyoming. Ten thousand years ago Pleistocene man entered and crossed North America. Two thousand years later the horse was extinct on this continent. The theory most widely supported by the scientific community contends that man in his search for food killed off the horse. Others suggest that man in combination with a virulent epidemic did the job. Whatever the cause, there were no horses on the North American continent when Columbus arrived in 1492. The horse was brought back to continental North America in 1519 by the Spanish conquistador, Hernando Cort6s. Cortes departed leaving behind only one colt. Next, according to legend, DeSoto's men set free "six great horses of Spain" and these horses are said to have sired the great wild race that replaced their kin which were lost to America thousands of years earlier. In his poem "The Distant Runners" Mark Van Doren celebrates this event with the lines, "Four and twenty Spanish hooves/Fling off their iron and cut the green, /Leaving circles new and clean/While overhead the wing-tips whirred." At about this time Coronado and his men were also riding horseback across the continent. The conquistadors treated the Plains Indians cruelly and, in return, the Indians often stole the explorers' horses. Early settlers and traders in the Santa Fe area brought more horses which, in turn, were stolen or escaped. It may be romantic to believe that our bands of wild horses derived from those of DeSoto, Coronado and other explorers. In fact, they did not. As George Gaylord Simpson states in his book Horses, "The feral herds — the 'wild horses' of western history — arose from horses that escaped from the missions, ranches and Indians, and not from those ridden by the explorers." Clearly then, our American wild horse is not technically a wild animal. A truly wild animal is one whose ancestors have always been wild. As our "wild" horses are all derived from imported domesticated stock, they are properly called feral horses, but through common use "wild" has become accepted. fvlost of the early wild horses were descendants of an old Andalusian breed. These Andalusian horses, according to Simpson, "were jennets or jinetas, descended in part from older, even prehistoric Spanish races but with a predominant Barb element brought in by the Arab conquerers from North Africa.' The classic Andalusian was rather small, generally built close to the ground with a wide chest, a muscular rather short neck, and a low-set tail. It displayed the whole range of equine colors, including spotting. After years of fending for themselves, the modern offspring of the proud Andalusian retain the almost incredible stamina and endurance of that breed but have lost many of the physical characteristics. They are still generally small, but too often border on the runty. Their scant and limited diet of grasses has contributed to their small stature and sometimes scrawny appearance of today's wild horse. Cross-breeding, whether uncontrolled or through attempts to improve the wild horse, has resulted in the disappearance ot the classic form of the Spanish horse. Nevertheless, the wild horse still retains the wide assortment of colors while the spotted or patterned form was particularly cherished by some Indian tribes. The mustangs or mestenos were originally the horses of the wild herds that belonged to no one. Eventually, the term mustang included the cowponies taken from these herds. Indian ponies usually contained much mustang blood and a little of any and every other kind of horse as well. Today's cowponies have been extensively crossed with other breeds and the original mustang is all but gone here in America. But in 1680 large bands of mustangs were racing across the plains. By 1900 their numbers had swelled to an estimated two million horses, ranging throughout the grasslands from west of the Mississippi to the Rockies, past the Continental Divide and through the deserts to the Pacific Coast. Today, following years ot merciless depredation, there are fewer than 17,000 "wild" horses on public lands in the United States. If these horses were simply being eliminated by the forces of nature, man's responsibility would be less grave. Over the years, however, the white man has had a variety of reasons for eliminating herds of wild horses. Little-known casualties of World War I, thousands of horses were sold to the allies to aid in the war effort. To break the Indian's will, their precious herds of horses were decimated. Cattlemen, anxious to preserve the grazing land for their own livestock, actively persecuted the wild horses. Hope Ryden, in her book America's Last Wild Horses, writes that between 1900 and 1926 the wild horse population on public lands declined from two million to one million. Today wild horses are being slaughtered for dog food. Not only swaybacked nags, weary after years of pulling a plow or wagon, but young. Bulletin February 1971 3 strong, free horses are being hounded to exhaustion by siren-howling planes. Low-flying horse-hunters dive over the panic-stricken herd blasting it with buckshot to keep it moving in the desired direction. Some horses drop dead from exhaustion, their lungs bursting from the strain, but others are driven madly on into the corral where, filled with fear, they often fight, pile up and trample each other to death. Those who survive the hideous chase are packed into trucks for cross-country shipment to the meat cannery. In her book, Hope Ryden states: Once the truck was loaded, ttie door was not opened again during the long haul to the packing plant and the horses were neither watered nor offered food. A transportation regulation known as "killer-rate" exempts truckers carrying livestock to market from a law which requires that in transit animals must be fed and watered at regular intervals. It is argued that animals en route to a packing plant are condemned cargo anyway, and the transporter need not spend time and money maintaining their physical well-being. Yet, though "killer-rate" unfortunately applies to all livestock, domestic animals do not suffer the kind of maltreatment inflicted on the wild horse during its ride to slaughter. The truck leaves in its wake unweaned colts doomed to starvation, stallions blinded with buckshot, and wretched animals whose hoofs were worn down to bloody stumps during the deadly race. And this just to fill Rover's dinner bowl. This dog-eat-horse policy is not without its supporters, obviously. Although not all agree with the methods by which the horses are exterminated, many people feel that if economic gain cannot be derived from them, then the horses have no right to exist. Mr. Chester (Chug) Utter, an airplane pilot and mustanger, claims to have captured 40,000 horses over 14 years for the Bureau of Land Management, which sold the animals at auction. Mr. Utter advocates wild horse preserves established on government land and says, "You need every spear of grass for deer, antelope and cattle. I don't have any ax to grind either way. But I'd much rather have wild game than a bunch of horses you can't do nothing with" {New York Times, Nov. 15, 1970, p. 62. "A Devoted Few Strive to Save Wild Horses"). Even Dr. C. Wayne Cook, head of Range Science Department of Colorado State University and chairman, Advisory Committee to the Department of the Interior on the Wild Horse Range in the Pryor Mountains, cautions that there should be some control over the numbers of wild horses lest they multiply too quickly and become too competitive for grazing lands. But Dr. Cook appreciates the emotional and historical factors too, in the movement to preserve the wild horses. Historically, the wild horse played a major role in the development of the west and was a positive aid to expeditions such as that of Lewis and Clark. It helped the early trappers, pioneers, ranchers and the fledgling cattle industry. The wild horse was an integral part of the culture of American Indians and was incorporated into their myths and ceremonies. The unquestionable emotional appeal of the wild horse was perfectly expressed by Matt Field's description of one he encountered along the Santa Fe trail in 1839, as related in America's Last Wild Horses (pp. 125-128): " 'Twas a beautiful animal ... a sorrel, with a jet black mane and tail. We could see the muscles quiver in his glossy limbs as he moved; and when half playfully and half in fright, he tossed his flowing mane in the air, and flourished his long silky tail, our admiration knew no bounds and we longed . . . hopelessly, vexatiously longed to possess him. Of all the brute creation the horse is the most admired by men. Combining beauty with usefulness, all countries and all ages yield it their admiration. But, though the finest specimen of its kind, a domestic horse will ever lack that magic and indescribable charm that beams like a halo around the simple name of freedom. The wild horse roving the prairie wilderness knows no master . . . has never felt the whip . . . never clasped in its teeth the bit to curb its native freedom, but gambols, unmolested over its grassy home where Nature has given it a bountiful supply of provender . . . We might have shot him from where we stood, but had we been starving, we would scarcely have done it. He was free, and we loved him for the very possession of that liberty we longed to take from him ... but we could not kill him." Philip Hershkovitz, research curator of mammals in Field Museum's Department of Zoology, believes that "few things in man's world equal the beauty of a racing herd of wild horses." As a taxonomist, he also points out that, "By destroying the horse we will have extirpated from the American continent an entire family of its wild fauna — for the second and last time." Hershkovitz went on to observe that while many dog lovers may protest cruelty to animals they unwittingly condone it by purchase of the product of a base and ruthless policy of extermination. For whatever reason, emotional, historical, or scientific, many are joining the growing movement to protect the last of the once numerous bands of wild horses. Mrs. Velma (Wild Horse Annie) Johnston, president. International Society for the Protection of Mustangs and Burros, is one of the prime forces in this movement and it was largely through her efforts that "The Wild Horse Annie Bill" (Public Law 86-234) was passed in September 1959. This bill prohibits the pursuit of unbranded horses or burros by aircraft on public domain. Like so many of the laws and regulations affecting the wild horse, this one, too, has a loophole. According to Mrs. Johnston, hunters get around this law by putting a branded mare into the wild horse herd and then gather up the whole group a year later. Obviously, then, further legislation is needed. Bulletin February 1971 A bill introduced by U.S. Senator Hansen of Wyoming would have given the Department of the Interior custody over the wild horses. Although the bill died in committee last year, Mrs. Johnston and her associates still hope to secure federal protection for the wild horse and get another bill introduced this year. There are now two wild horse preserves on federal land controlled by the Bureau of Land Management. One, in the Pryor Mountains of Wyoming, was the result of the efforts of a group of concerned citizens dedicated to saving a herd of 200 wild horses. The other federal preserve is less than ideally situated on the Nellis Air Force bombing and gunnery range and the Nevada test site of the Atomic Energy Commission. Twenty years ago, Simpson noted that herds of wild horses were relentlessly hunted and diminished. He commented on the loss of the historic mustang and noted that in the Argentine a breeding stock of ponies similar to our mustangs had been gathered from remote parts of the country and preserved in "an admirable, increasingly valued registered breed, the Criollo." His point was, of course, that a similar project could be undertaken here. Although they do not all agree on goals, there are groups here in the United States interested in the wild horses, such as the American Mustang Association, the National Mustang Association and the Spanish Mustang Registry. The first seeks to improve the wild horse by breeding for purposes of competition and marketing; the second is concerned with the sport of "mustanging" — running and capturing wild horses for personal and recreational purposes, as well as educating the public on the conservation needs of the wild horse. The third group, the Spanish Mustang Registry, is out for blood — pure Spanish blood. Fifty years ago Robert and Ferdinand Photos from Hope Ryden's America's Last WUd Horses. Brislawn began to search the wild bands for pure-blooded Spanish horses to form the foundation of what would become the Spanish Mustang Registry. The non-profit association was formally established in 1958 to perpetuate the mustang and establish a permanent reserve for the animals. Eighty-year-old Robert "Wyoming Kid" Brislawn explains, "We are trying to restore a breed, not create one." For this reason, the Spanish Mustang Registry cannot be looked to as the salvation of all wild horses. In the past 50 years only about 200 horses have qualified for the registry and today few roam the 3,000 acre Brislawn Ranch. As bills are discussed by committees, the grim hunt for dog food relentlessly goes on. Thousands of years ago, driven by hunger, primitive man used his simple tools to kill the wild horses. Today, sated with an abundance of artificially sweetened, seasoned, colored and preserved foods, we use our sophisticated, motorized skills to kill the legendary wild horse for dog food. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ripley, Anthony. "A Devoted Few Strive to Save Wild Horses." The New York Times, November 15, 1970 (p. 1). Ryden, Hope. America's Last Wild Horses. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970. Simpson, George Gaylord. Horses. New York: Oxford University Press, 1951. Patricia M. Williams is Managing Editor of Scientific Publications at Field Museum. Bulletin February 1971 Algae Are Man's Best Friends Dr. Matthew H. Nitecki Acetabularia crenulata. One of the most beautiful algae, often referred to as mermaid's wineglass or mermaid's parasol. The disc at the top of the plant indeed looks like a shallow cup or inverted parasol. Because it grows easily in captivity, it is a much-studied alga. The recent studies are particularly concerned with the role and function and interrelation of cell .nucleus and the protoplasm. Illustrations by Richard Roesener If an extraterrestrial giant could come to the earth and stand over the greater Chicago area, he would notice many unusual things. When the sun first falls upon the earth the biomass begins flowing towards the center of the megalopolis, and when the sun goes down the same biomass leaves the city to disperse itself into the periphery. The giant would postulate his first law — that the solar energy controls the movements of the biomass. If he could pick up a car in his colossal fingers the occupant would either jump out, try to hide, scream, panic, freeze, or simply die of fright. If, nevertheless, the giant would succeed in holding up the driver, he no doubt would squeeze all life out of the poor man and he would postulate his second law — that life is a fragile thing and very difficult to study. He may further add that life manifests unpredictable behavior and movements. The giant, while examining and testing the physical environment, would formulate his third law — that the biomass releases great wastes into the atmosphere and into the water in the complicated process of manufacture of seemingly strange objects, and in production of heat and locomotion. If our giant strides away In his seven-league boots to follow the sun west, he may step over some forest and wonder over its tranquillity and the purity of the air above it. He will notice that oxygen is produced by plants during the day and little waste is manufactured. He may pick up the tree from its bed and meditate over it under the scrutiny of his instruments. He will neither be shot at, nor screamed at, and he will, therefore, modify his second law by adding that plants are more stable and less neurotic than animals. When examining the air around him, and measuring the production of sugar and carbohydrates, he will postulate a fourth law — that plants provide all the food and all the oxygen, and that animals simply eat and burn it. He may consider animals Bulletin February 1971 degenerate organisms unable to produce their own foodstuffs and dependent upon plants to do it for them. He may even think of man as a capricious parasite of the earth. He will see plants as benefactors that alter the simple Inert matter into the complexity and dynamism of life. Our other-world giant may go further to the great ocean where he will find out that most of this activity of food and oxygen production and cleaning the air of carbon dioxide is conducted in the sea by "simple" organisms called algae. And so he will put forward his fifth law — that algae, indeed, produce most that is needed for life on the earth. Our giant will marvel at the efficiency of algae and will discover that the well-known photosynthetic equation light -> CH,0 + O, CO2 + H,0 green plants means that one molecule of carbon dioxide combines with one molecule of water in the presence of light within the pigment of green plants to produce carbohydrates and oxygen. In a more sophisticated way he can say that in the process of photosynthesis the atoms of hydrogen from water are used to transfer carbon dioxide into carbohydrates and at the same time the free oxygen from the dissociated water is released. Our Gargantuan, just like Professor Eugene I. Rabinowitch of the University of Illinois, will calculate that each year plants of the earth combine about 150 billion tons of carbon with 25 billion tons of hydrogen, and set free 400 billion tons of oxygen! Throughout the last three bdlion years, plants have been continuously dying and organic matter has been continuously decomposing. The only process known that steadily reverses the results of decomposition and provides for the continuity of life on earth is photosynthesis. In the process of photosynthesis, plants harness solar energy and produce organic matter which, after being used by animals. Is dissipated and is mostly lost as heat into the interplanetary space. Our Cyclocrinites dactioloides. This marine calcareous green alga of Silurian age was for a long time considered a problematic sponge. Its fossil remains are commonly found among 450-million-year-old coral reefs in Illinois and Iowa. colossus will be astonished to realize that when photosynthesis ceases, life stops and the atmosphere will lose all its free oxygen. In the past there has been a vigorous discussion in scientific literature of what constitutes the plant kingdom and of what constitutes the animal kingdom. The differences between these two groups disappear when "lower" forms of life are examined. While our Titan can tell the difference between a dog and a rosebush, the placement of certain microscopic flagellate organisms within a kingdom will be more difficult for him. In order to resolve this problem of placing plant-animal-like creatures in classificatory schemes that would indicate their relationship he would expand the two kingdoms into three. In time, this system too would become inadequate, and soon four and even five kingdoms would have to be recognized. The five kingdoms concept of organisms has been suggested by Professor R. H. Whittaker of Cornell University to consist of Monera (for example, blue-green algae and bacteria). Protista, (unicellular forms such as euglenoids, golden algae and protozoans), Plantae ("conventional" plants such as red and green algae and vascular plants). Fungi (absorptive organisms such as fungi and slime molds), and Animalia (the animals). The system of five kingdoms of living things appears to be gaining some acceptance and seems to serve best our present knowledge of the living world. Within our five kingdom classification algae are assigned to three of these kingdoms: Monera, Protista and Plantae. The word alga is subject to change as our understanding of the interrelationship between various groups of algae changes. It is now believed that the algae represent a great variety of organisms of diversified evolutionary Bulletin February 1971 origin and not of a single common lineage. Algologists use the word alga to indicate several groups of organisms having similar reproductive mechanisms. The problem or problems of classification of algae are very technical, particularly since algae constitute a loosely-knit group. The main characters used in their classification are biochemical: algae are separated on the basis of their pigments, the nature of their cell v\/all, the products of their photosynthesis, and the nature of their flagella. Algae lack true leaves, stems, or roots, and for this reason have been considered "primitive." This concept is, however, now losing support. Algae represent a great diversity of forms. Some are microscopic; others, as Pacific kelp, may reach a length of 150 feet. Reports of kelp 600 feet long from Brazil need confirmation. Certain algae are single cells that may be filamentous or branching. There are those that are membranous, or some may even be tubular. Although some species are terrestrial, most are aquatic and are found in all waters, seas, lakes, streams and ponds. They can float as plankton or they can exist attached to substrate or to other plants or animals. Some algae inhabit the soil, others live on bark of trees or even on rocks, and recently algae have been collected from the atmospheric currents. There are even those that thrive on snow or within other organisms, or as lichens, the composite organisms consisting of fungi living together with algae. Even two species Halicoryne wrightii, "sea-club alga." A marine green alga from Dutch East Indies and from the Philippines. The genus is known throughout the warm, tropical seas and four species are found in the Caribbean. The body of the plant is covered with a thin layer of carbonates. of sloths in Central America may be distinguished by the different species of algae that grow on their hair. Algae that precipitate calcium and carbonate ions from the sea water build hard, limy coverings. These algae are extremely important as rock-building organisms and are responsible for the formations of many limestones throughout geologic history, especially reef deposits. In addition to forming their own masses they also act as the cement that binds together the skeletons of invertebrate animals. It is no surprise, therefore, that these plants have left an extensive fossil record and are extensively studied by paleontologists. Algae as a group provide the earliest evidence of life on earth, and are the most ancient group of living things known. The oldest algae-like fossils are about three billion years old! Since they represent the first documented life on earth they are from the evolutionary viewpoint extremely important. If only our giant could search the outcrops of rocks and find the places where remnants of past life are preserved, then he would rejoice in the discovery of the past history of our planet and the life which existed on it. But, by a singular paradox, the processes which gave us the lands also turned the sediments into rocks, changed their composition and made them into marbles and schist, hiding the records from the seeker, and altering the organic remains into their byproducts. Thus, all but scanty evidence was destroyed. And yet, when we look, when we carefully comb the rocks, we find shapes that are varied, some recognizable, some with strange forms that do not exist any more. Some of these finds are fossils of a common nature, abundant, obtainable by the "bushel," others are rare. Some are so delicate that they require special treatment; some are so preserved that they need the strength of machines and endless hours to prepare for Bulletin February 1971 study. Among many fossils some become more important — because they explain more, they possess some characteristics absent in other specimens— and hence instantly become more interesting and meaningful. The fossil, in brief, reflects the image of life as it once was. Algae in the 19th century, and among many persons even today, have been considered less vital than most other plants and animals, and are usually deprecated as seaweed, pond scum, and kelp. But algae as a group are important, as we have seen, not only because they represent the first documented life on earth but also because they produce most of the food and oxygen necessary for life on earth. In addition, algae are becoming economically important and great quantities of them are used for human consumption particularly in Japan. They may possibly become a future source of food for the ever-growing and hungry human population. They are already used as a source of f^h'.i I \ ,. i i ^^^^ Neomeris van-bosseae. When examined in the Museum dry collection, this alga does not look like a plant at all because its attractive white outer calcareous cortex resembles an animal's exterior skeleton. Under this hard covering are whorls of white branches that expand at their ends. potassium and iodine, and for treatment of sewage in certain localities. On his long way home, our extraterrestrial visitor will hold in his possession a few vials of small, barely green, calcareous, tubular, whorled algae from the tropical seas of the earth. And he'll wonder over these strange benefactors of apparent simplicity and beauty that together with untold numbers of other algae since time immemorial have endlessly and continuously provided the source of food and oxygen to the inhabitants of the earth. He will learn now that nature manifests beauty of the highest degree in a multitude of forms — beauty of structure and shape. And he'll pause over this for awhile. Life is a short business when dealing with an individual organism. It is somewhat longer when dealing with taxonomic units like species and genera. Man has existed for time long enough to have a geologic past — but yet, life is still a very fragile thing. Life is difficult to study, because the process of study itself may modify or kill the organism. But life on the geological scale is different; the organisms are gone, but hard skeletal parts remain. Sometimes unaltered, but in most cases replaced, recrystalized — but yet often retaining most of the original details, even the color pattern may be preserved. How many of us have stopped to think that we are dealing with life when studying fossils? Here the wonder is that we have in front of us the record of life, represented by fragments, from which we choose to reconstruct the whole of the evolutionary path of organic history. The past is nebulous and we are penetrating it. What else can give greater joy than to unveil the unkown? Dr. Matthew H. Nitecki is Associate Curator of Fossil Invertebrates in Field Museum's Department ot Geology. Calathella anstedi. A half-billion-year-old (Lower Ordovician) green calcareous alga from Newfoundland. This fossil is one of the oldest "higher" forms of algae found. Its outer structure is very complicated and advanced, and the alga can be easily placed in a class of well-known living green algae. Bulletin February 1971 SCANDINAVIA: lands of fjords and the midnight sun Phil Clark Most persons, in quest of natural history novelty and nuance, think of exotic lands in southern hemispheres, with their gaudy flowering trees and brightly plumed birds. But I found a refreshing view of flora, and fauna, and peoples during a month's visit to Scandinavia, where I programmed a natural history tour for next June. It sharpened my joy in our own northern American flora and avifauna; there was so much subtle contrast in the two basically similar ecological systems. Other sharper contrasts were stimulating too. The great Scandinavian spruce-pine forests and the birch-beech-poplar woodlands still stand, even though they have been a judiciously used source of wealth for generations. Rivers are relatively unpolluted and buildings, from medieval to Victorian, stand well kept in mellow, unsooted harmony with handsomely modern architecture on clean city streets. The most exciting fjord I saw was the greatest of them all: Norway's Sognefjord. At first the scenery was similar to that from Stavanger to Bergen Thirteenth century Norwegian stave church in Oslo's Folkmuseum. — little rocky islets from which clouds of Lesser Black Back, Herring and Black Headed Gulls rose to meet us over dark seas. Liver-colored Calluna heather hugged the wet, black rocks. And at one islet I glimpsed a pair of Golden-eyed Ducks, spending the summer, plump and happy. As our ship neared the Sognefjord straits, the islands grew larger and finally we steamed through a great rocky gateway, its sides fleshed with deep green spruce and white-boled Betula pendula. Finally, near the fjord's inland end, a day's voyage from Bergen, I spent the night at a small inn in a village which clustered at the foot of towering, spruce-green cliffs, a nest of white-painted, green-trimmed houses. Wandering by foot and by bus the next two days brought many a thrill, as plant communities changed from flowery meadows edged with birch, mountain ash, willow and pine in the valleys, to forests of spire-tall Norway spruce on the mountain sides and to ground- hugging silvery-leaved willows and dark junipers, dwarfed both by mountain winds and by inherent traits. These fringed the bald, gray tundra, where glacial snows gleamed in cold ovals and dark lakes gushed into streams that tumbled, foaming over rocky cliffs and down to the fjord, miles below. In Oslo, the folk museum made me feel that I had known this well-kept land for generations. Here I walked through a spruce-birch forest from one village to another, each typical of an era and an area — and all the buildings, planks, tiles and all, brought from sites throughout Norway. The idea of the midnight sun moved me as little as some remote solar eclipse . . . until I experienced its surprising nocturnal light. This was in a ship on cold Lake Inari, far north of the Arctic Circle in northern Finland. Here was a different and an exciting world of the mysterious Lapps and their 10 Bulletin February 1971 Gustav Vigeland nudes in Oslo's Frogner Park. great herds of reindeer wandering free over vast nniles of gray tundra. Connprehensive exhibits at Helsinki's National Museum added the knowledge-dimension that only actual objects can, to my understanding of the prehistory, history and art of a creative people, the Finns. Their origins shrouded in a mystery lighted only by linguistic connections with the Magyars and the Esthonians, the Finns came early to this northern land, then peopled only by the primitive Lapps, from Esthonia across the Bay. Feeling for design is everywhere evident in Helsinki's architecture, from its classical central square to the romantic buildings of the early part of this century and climaxing in the magnificent garden suburbs which cluster on Helsinki's outskirts: in particular, elegantly simple and functionally practical Tapeola. But In prosperous, sensibly-ordered Sweden is what I believe the most beautiful temperate world city: Stockholm, spreading from Baltic islands to mainland. Its copper-green, spike-spired churches, its medieval and revival castles, its elaborate pubHc buildings of the last century and its architecture of the twenties — clean-lined yet resonant of the national past: all these exist in lovely harmony with glass and steel modern buildings. And they front on mostly broad, clean avenues, frequently interrupted by parks and squares — flowery, green, rich in sculpture and furnished with inviting benches and outdoor restaurants. All this architectural harmony and beauty is no accident, for new construction or demolition of old buildings in Stockholm must first be approved by a committee charged with protecting and increasing the city's beauty. For the artist and the garden lover, Stockholm offers an unusual joy in Mines' Garden, on the rocky cliffside of the Island of Lidingo. On the Swedish island of Gotland, I found something of interest for every natural history taste. At the wildflower preserve of Allekvia, midst pines and flowery meadow, grow several species of terrestrial orchids including Orchis sambucina, Habenaria bifolia and Cypripedium calceolus — closely related Bulletin February 1971 It Visby, capital of the Swedish island of Gotland. to our large yellow moccasin. Bronze age man, about 1000 BC, in forested glades and near tfie sea, built great rock outlines of sfiips over burials — magic vessels to bear tfie departed to Aasgaard. On Stora Karlso island off Gotland, New Stone Age man, 2500 BC, left cave dwellings. On the same island, I found many sea birds, including colonies of guillemots, shags and razorbills. Gotland's principal city, Visby, has some handsome medieval ruins. Few Gothic cathedrals equal the majesty of Uppsala's great Cathedral, where the bones of St. Erik the King, martyred in Uppsala in 1160, lie in a golden box in the high altar. The 13th century Cathedral stands over what was probably the greatest religious center of pagan Scandinavia, when the one-eyed god, Odin, reigned supreme (he traded the eye for the gift of wisdom). This university city also is a place of almost reverent inspiration for botanists. It is here where Carl von Linne (founder of the Linnaean system of nomenclature and classification) lived and carried out his studies, using a botanic garden which has been carefully kept as he knew it. In nearby Hammarby, Linnaeus' gracious country home and woodland is maintained. The botanic gardens of Uppsala, given by Gustav III to the University in 1786, are today immaculately kept and artistically designed. Further south, just across from Denmark, is Helsingborg. Nearby are some of the most beautifully designed gardens in Europe: Norrviken Gardens at Bastad. The gardens' creator, Rudolf Abelin, was a landscape architect and at the turn of the century he began developing these varied gardens for his own pleasure. All undisguisedly Swedish, they nonetheless convey the moods of Japanese, Cloister, Baroque, Renaissance and Romantic gardens. The exotic moods are there, but they link to the Swedish setting of sea and rolling hills. Another masterful garden, this is Helsingborg itself, is the royal garden of Sofiero, where sprightly, 87-year-old King Gustav VI Adolf often indulges in his gardening hobby (he is also an active archaeology buff). A few minutes by ferry and I was in Denmark, at Elsinor, where Shakespeare set his tragedy at Kronberg Castle, but this turreted 16th Century Dutch Renaissance castle was built by Frederik II centuries after the historical Hamlet. In Copenhagen I found another impressive castle, this the creation of Christian IV in 1606. Its gardens blend from one style to another, herbaceous border, knot garden and park-estate. But garden landscaping isn't the only thing that rivets the eye in Denmark. The design of jewelry, tableware, glass, chairs — almost everything that beguiles from the shop windows along Copenhagen's pedestrian street shopping area. And what can compare for gaity to an evening in the Tivoli Entertainment Park? Phil Clark is Chief of Field Museum Natural History Tours. 12 Bulletin February 1971 : Resources and Man by Committee on Resources and Man of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. San Francisco, Freeman & Co. (1969). $5.95. With each new famine somewhere in the world, with each new medical advance that adds a new control on death without a commensurate control on birth, the specter of world overpopulation becomes more and more evident even to the most oblivious observer. Will mankind choose quantity of life at the expense of its quality, or the reverse? Indeed, is there still a chance to make such a choice? Over the past few years these questions have been bandied about with a high degree of emotionalism on both sides. This book, Resources and Man, details, with almost complete lack of emotion, the hard numerical facts on both sides of this issue. Eight experts have teamed together, each contributing a chapter, to address the question of how far the Earth's resources will stretch to accommodate a population that is presently doubling itself every 35 years! The book examines four major areas: (1) projected population, (2) food resources, (3) mineral resources, (4) energy resources. Each question is handled in a careful, analytical manner with hard numbers and definite conclusions based on these numbers. Thus, it is not a book for casual reading, nor is it for the person who seeks vague generalizations. Some of the specific conclusions are worth stating in this review: (1) The oceans are not a "cornucopia" of mineral wealth, and never will be. (2) Contrary to popular opinion, the oceans will never be a major world food supply. They can supply at most only 2.5 times their present output of food products. At best they can become a supplementary source for much-needed protein, but never for food calories (i.e. carbohydrates and fats). (3) Petroleum and natural gas will be expended in about 100 years. Coal could last 400 years, unless we use it to replace petroleum, in which case, it would last at most 200 years. (4) The only long-term source of energy will be nuclear power but only if we redesign our present power reactors to breeder-types. Some of the authors in this book clearly have worked harder at their respective contributions than others. The chapter by Thomas Levering on "Mineral Resources from the Land" is disappointing because he spends most of his time in a belabored discussion on the problems involved in making mineral-resource projections. This identical kind of problem is, of course, faced by most of the other authors, who, nevertheless, state their methods and limitations and proceed to their respective assignments. The chapter by Marston Bates on "The Human Ecosystem" is completely qualitative and is more philosophical in approach. Its position, as Chapter 1 , however, serves to delimit the areas to be considered. Chapter 2, "Interactions between Man and His Resources," consists of a series of vague, qualitative, sociological generalizations and is entirely out of place in a book of this kind. The chapters by S. Hendricks, P. Cloud, N. Keyfitz, and W. Ricker are excellent and workmanlike. The final chapter (8) by M. K. Hubbert on "Energy Resources" is outstanding and is the finest exposition on this subject available to the general reader. It covers all possibilities for large-scale energy generation (except wood-burning and wind) in a thorough and quantitative manner, and draws together a huge range of source material on this subject. For the reader who is critically interested in these questions and wishes to have the best summation of quantitative information available this book is highly recommended. The pessimist will find here a great deal of quantitative justification to fortify his gloom; however, the optimist will not find himself vanquished by the data. A few gleams of hope are seen: falling birth rates in some Asiatic countries over the last decade; possibilities for increased yields of some crops in some places in the world; nuclear fission (breeder) reactors, and eventually fusion reactors, which are capable of providing energy for literally thousands of years. The introduction (unsigned) to this book should be read both before and again after completing the book. In it are detailed twenty-six very specific recommendations to establish policies that will wisely stretch resources as far as possible into the future. Many years ago Winston Churchill posed a question regarding the impending fall of Britannia as a world power. If, in the end, uncontrolled population demands cause mankind to outstretch its earthly resources and Civilization herself tumbles, we will again have cause to ask the same question: "Did she fall — or was she pushed?" by Dr. Edward J. Olsen, curator of mineralogy, Field Museum Bulletin February 1971 13 LETTERS To the Editor: I believe you have made a mistake in your story of the Origin of Skeletons in animals In the December Bulletin on the chart. It says man has been on the earth for two million years. Well, you may be mistaken, man has been on the earth between eight and 15 million years ago, and I have proof. On page 4 paragraph 2 In the 1970 Young Peoples World Book Science Supplement quotes "after examination of fossil teeth and jaws which had lain in the collections of the Calcutta and British Museums for many years, Drs. Elwyn L. Simons and David B. Pilbean, both of Yale University, assigned them to a manlike homonid that lived in India and Africa between eight and 15 million years ago." They took radiocarbon tests on the bones in California in 1969. In California, Dr. Ales Hrdlicka of the U.S. National Museum was convinced that man had not reached the Americas earlier than 2,000 years ago. Researchers at the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History announced in 1969 that a skull of a woman in the La Brea tar pits had been tested by means of radiocarbon. It turned out that the skull was 9,000 years old, more than four times more than what Dr. Ales Hrdlicka had said. I hope this will prove what I have said, we should keep our minds open for further proof of man's existence. Charles Matza, Jr. Chicago The author replies: Charles Matza has been misled by some tricky terminology. The "man-like homonid" he refers to has been considered to be a member of the same family as man, but not yet a man (that is, of the genus Homo). One must be arbitrary in drawing a line between man and apes, and for this reason the date of two million years on my chart is also only approximate and arbitrary. As to his other point, man was certainly in the Americas well before the 9,000 year date assigned to the La Brea skull, but here we are talking of thousands, not millions, of years. Robert H. Denison (Dr. Denison recently retired from Field Museum, having served as Curator of Fossil Fishes in the Museum's Department of Geology for the past 22 years.) To the editor: The Bulletin's recent article on turtles in mythology and folklore contained much interesting material, but it did not explore the roles of the turtle in ancient Egyptian religion. Apparently, from prehistory (before c. 3000 BC in Egypt) through the Middle Kingdom and subsequent troubled interlude (c. 2000-1575 BC) turtles were good luck; many turtle figurines were made throughout that span, some used as burial objects. Probably the protective shell and ability to withdraw and emerge caused turtles to be associated with preservation and resurrection; this idea survived in a passage from the later Book of the Dead, "I have become Khepri (rising sun). I have germinated as plants; I have covered/ clothed myself as a turtle." That spell was written when the turtle had already been redefined as an enemy, and it shows the conservative tendency of Egypt's faith which resulted in the retaining of contradictions! During the New Kingdom and later periods (from c. 1575 BC) the formula "May Re (sun-god) live and the turtle die!" was constantly reiterated on tomb walls and in funerary papyri, often illustrated by the deceased spearing a turtle. According to Dr. Henry Fischer's excellent study Ancient Egyptian Representations ot Turtles (New York 1968), the turtle was cast as the Sun's antagonist because of the exceedingly furtive and somewhat nocturnal habits of the Egyptian river turtle Trionyx niloticus, which eventually impressed the people more than the sturdiness and renewing. (Dr. Fischer finds one anti-turtle spell already in the Coffin Texts, the Middle Kingdom predecessor of the Book of the Dead, just as we have seen a recollection of that reptile's originally good role in the latter body of texts.) Turtle amulets had been discontinued during the early New Kingdom (indeed, some old ones were disfigured upon rediscovery); they were resumed c. 700 BC, but these were made to ward off turtles. The late period featured many charms of dangerous and noxious beasts based on a common magical principle ot homeopathy, or like guarding against like. Edmund S. Metzer Chicago Please address all letters to the editor to Bulletin Field Museum of Natural History Roosevelt Road and Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length. 14 Bulletin February 1971 Lester Armour, 1895 - 1970 Lester Armour, long-time banker and philanthropist, and a member of the Board of Trustees of Field Museum since 1939, passed away on December 26 at the age of 75. Through the years, he served as a member of the Building and Nominating Committees, and since 1962 on the Finance Committee, offering his help and guidance In many matters vitally affecting the Museum. He vi^as a Corporate Member, Life Member and Contributor of Field Museum. In 1935 Mr. Armour retired from the meat packing business founded by his grandfather, where he had held the position of Executive Vice President. Later he became Vice Chairman of the Board of the Harris Trust & Savings Bank, a post he held until 1963. Lester Armour Mr. Armour was one of three prominent business men appointed public advisers to the Midwest Stock Exchange In 1965 by members of the Exchange's Board of Governors. Among his many humanitarian activities, Mr. Armour supported the Salvation Army for many years and was a member of its advisory board. He was former Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Illinois Institute of Technology, and a member of the Board at the time of his death. Dr. Lewis Back from New Ireland Dr. Phillip Lewis, curator of primitive art and Melanesian ethnology at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, has returned from a yearlong expedition to the Melanesian Island of New Ireland in the Territory of Papua and New Guinea, where he was studying art in its social context. This trip was sponsored jointly by the Museum and the National Science Foundation. This is Dr. Lewis' second trip to New Ireland, the first having taken place in 1953-54, when on a Fulbright Scholarship to the Australian National University in Canberra, he was enabled to study art in context in New Ireland. Since 1954 he has been studying museum collections from New Ireland in European, Australian and U.S. museums, including those of the Field Museum, which has the second largest New Ireland collection among world museums — about 2700 pieces. In 1970 he showed photos of these museum specimens, which had been collected over the past 100 years, to New Irelanders in order to learn more about them, he observed modern versions of their major memorial ceremonial, called malanggan, and he studied social changes in the same village visited in 1954 and again in 1970. Lewis found that the art of making the carved and painted wooden images (called malanggan, also) is virtually dead, but that the ceremonies still flourish, but without the carving. Concrete gravestones are now made and they are supplanting the formerly made wooden carvings. "A sad fact is," said Lewis, "that just at the time [now] when New Irelanders are affluent enough to sponsor large and complex memorial celebrations, there aren't enough carvers still operating to be supported by the new wealth, so it goes into the expanding system of new-style memorials, i.e., with concrete grave markers." Dr. Lewis is planning a book on New Ireland art which will incorporate the field observations of modern social context which have a direct bearing on how the art was made and used in earlier times. Geology Field Trip to Ozarks Dr. Matthew H. Nitecki, associate curator, Department of Geology, will conduct a field trip to the Ozarks April 4-10. This region that cuts across parts of Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma is a diversified geological area of igneous and sedimentary rocks, some at least one billion years old. The sea covered the area many times, depositing predominantly limey sediments which later became sedimentary rock. Other geological processes produced deposits of mineable ores, particularly lead and iron. A wide variety of geological phenomena will be studied in the field, and fossils and minerals can be collected in the mines and quarries. Anyone interested in joining this nontechnical field trip should phone Mrs. Maria Matyas, University of Chicago Extension, at Financial 6-8300 for further information. Members of the Museum are eligible for a discount. New Hall of Jades Field Museum's famous collection of Chinese jades will again go on display in October in a setting befitting its standing as one of the finest in the United States. Mrs. John L. Kellogg, who has contributed so much to the cultural life of the city, is making the new installation possible through her generous gift. In appreciation of her gift and as a memorial to her husband, this hall will be named "The John L. and Helen Kellogg Hall." During the past year and a half that the Hall of Jades has been closed to the public, extensive remodeling plans have been underway for the new hall. Mrs, Thomas Yuhas, who completed her M.A. in Asian art history at the University of Michigan, spent one year at Field Museum researching and authenticating the collection under the supervision of Dr. Kenneth M. Starr, former curator of Asian archaeology and ethnology. Hundreds of the choicest and most representative jades from the Neolithic period through the Ch'ing Dynasty (1644-1912 AD.) were selected. They will be installed in recessed display areas that are specially lighted to bring out the details and subtleties of each object. Porcelains, bronzes, scrolls, rubbings, ceramics and poetry will supplement the jades in the new hall, putting them into proper historical perspective and showing how the symbolism of a dynastic period carried through in various art forms. Carpeting and teak walls will set off the displays ^nd contribute to a contemplative atmosphere. A sensitively carved small jade horse from the Sung Dynasty (960-1279 A.D.) is Infused with a feeling for the spirit of the animal. Bulletin February 1971 15 NSF Grant for "The Flora of Guatemala" Field Museum of Natural History tias been awarded a grant of $44,000 by the National Science Foundation to support continuing research entitled "The Flora of Guatemala." The grant, to run two years, is under the direction of Dr. Louis O. Williams, chairman of the Department of Botany. According to Dr. Williams, when completed. "The Flora of Guatemala" will be the first comprehensive and modern account of the plant life of any large region of the American tropics. It will serve as important reference material for scientists in other fields who need to know about the vegetation of the area. Eleven volumes of the flora covering flowering plants, ferns and mosses are finished at present, representing thirty years of research. It is estimated that four more years are needed to complete the final four volumes. National Institute of Ecology Launched Detailed plans for a National Institute of Ecology were presented to a meeting of the Institute's founders at Field Museum, December 30, 1970. The Institute, as a research, policy study, information clearing- house, and public education institution, should strongly advance our understanding of ecology and help us reverse our increasing degradation of the environment. The Museum is one of the founders, along with some thirty-five universities, other natural history museums, laboratories, research and development institutions, and oceanographic institutes. Dr. Robert F. Inger, chairman of scientific programs, has been deeply involved in the planning work, begun in 1968 by a study committee of the Ecological Society of America, with financial support from the National Science Foundation. Henry S. Dybas, head. Division of Insects, has been appointed Museum representative to the Institute, and Dr. Rupert L. Wenzel, chairman. Department of Zoology, is alternate. The Society had been concerned since 1965, well before the term ecology became an everyday word, about the fact that existing information concerning the ecological hazards of much public and private activity is not getting through to either governmental agencies or the public. It was no less concerned about the present and future needs for new knowledge to predict the ecological effects of new technology. Since then almost everyone has at least become aware that large-scale use of herbicides in Vietnam, SSTs in the skies, and oil spills in any body of water must have immediate, probably enduring, and in the long run possibly unendurable environmental consequences. The Institute will have six components. One will be a laboratory to conduct basic ecological research of scope beyond the capacity of existing agencies. An office of forecasting and planning will assist other agencies, public and private, in use of existing ecological knowledge to predict and thus make practical plans to avoid localized ecological problems. A division of policy research will work to bridge the gap between fundamental ecological knowledge and responsible public policy and social action. An office of information resources will be a centralized clearinghouse providing comprehensive library services, computational services, and inventories of ecological research in progress. A division of communication and education will build lines of two-way communication between ecologists and all segments of the public, including other scientists, public and private decision-makers, and the general public. A division of biome modeling and synthesis will have primary responsibility for planning and coordinating scientific activities, and will provide research assistance to outside scientists. A mixture of public and private funds derived from both grants and income from contractual services will support the Institute, so that it can be independent of any governmental or private agency (including its parent organization, the Ecological Society of America). Student Anthropology Program Field Museum has been awarded a grant of $8,705 from the National Science Foundation for support of its Student Science Training Program in Anthropology, scheduled for June 28 through August 6. The course is under the direction of Miss Harriet Smith of the Museum's Department of Education. The six-week program is a unique one in that it provides a sound foundation in the various fields of anthropology and is designed to assist students in testing a career interest. It is open to 27 high-ability high school students who have just completed their junior year. Selection will be on the basis of academic achievement, recommendations of teachers and personal interviews. In its eighth year, the training course includes lectures by outstanding authorities, seminars, workshops, research projects, study of Museum collections and participation in an archaeological excavation. Application forms are available from high school officials or Miss Smith and must be returned to Field Museum no later than March 15. r SCANDINAVIA: REFRESHING LANDS OF FJORDS & MIDNIGHT SUN JUNE 8 -JULY 2, 1971 $2,405 (INCLUDES A $500 TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION) Fjords, outdoor museums, gardens, wildflowers, birds, archaeological sites, architecture, design, Linnaeus' gardens, great cathedrals, historic palaces, opera, midnight sun in Lappland, reindeer: Bergen, Oslo, Helsinki, Tapiola, Lake Inari, Stockholm, Gotland Island, Uppsala, Gothenburg, Kattegat, Halsingborg, Norrviken, Sofiero, Bosjokloster, Lund, Helsinfors, Copenhagen. WRITE: FIELD MUSEUM WORLDWIDE NATURAL HISTORY TOURS ROOSEVELT RD. AT LAKE SHORE DR. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60605 16 Bulletin February 1971 CALENDAR Continuing Catalogue of the Different Specimens of Cloth Collected in the Three Voyages of Captain Cook, to the Southern Hemisphere. London, Alexander Shaw, 1787, shown in the South Lounge. The rare copy consists of actual tapa cloth specimens collected during Captain Cook's voyages to the South Seas (1768-1780). The volume is the gift of Mrs. A. W. F. Fuller. Through IVIarchSI. Life in Other Worlds? An exhibit of the Murchison meteorite, a Type II carbonaceous chondrlte, of which only 14 exist out of the almost 2,000 known meteorites. Recently, amino acids, possible building blocks of life, have been reported in this meteorite. South Lounge. Through March 21. John James Audubon's elephant folio, "The Birds of America," on display in the North Lounge. A different plate from the rare, first-edition set is featured each day. "Exploring Indian Country," Winter Journey for Children. The free, self-guided tour enables youngsters to see American Indians of three environments as the early explorers saw them. All boys and girls who can read and write may participate. Journey sheets are available at Museum entrances. Through March 9. 7Sth Anniversary Exhibit: A Sense of Wonder, A Sense of History, A Sense of Discovery, continues indefinitely. Exhibits relating to Field Museum's past and present and current research projects are shown in a new and different way. Hall 3. Hours 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday-Thursday 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday and February 1 and 15 The Museum Library is open 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday Begins February 7 26th Chicago international Exhibition of Nature Photography, featuring award-winning photographic prints. Sponsored by the Nature Camera Club of Chicago and Field Museum. South Lounge. Through February 28. February 7 and February 14 A showing of prize-winning transparencies from the 26th Chicago International Exhibition of Nature Photography, 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. Through February 7 A Child Goes Forth, an exhibit of toys and games from around the world, examines their importance in the cultural development of children. Hall 9. Meetings February 9, 7:45 p.m.. Nature Camera Club of Chicago February 9, 8 p.m., Chicagoland Glider Council February 10, 7 p.m., Chicago Ornithological Society February 10, 7:30 p.m.. Windy City Grotto — National Speleological Society February 11,8 p.m., Chicago Mountaineering Club February 14, 2 p.m., Chicago Shell Club February 21, 2 p.m., Illinois Orchid Society March 9, 7:45 p.m., Nature Camera Club of Chicago March 9, 8 p.m., Chicagoland Glider Council March 10, 7 p.m., Chicago Ornithological Society March 10, 7:30 p.m., Windy City Grotto — National Speleological Society Coming in March Color in Nature, an exhibit of broad scope, investigates the color dimension of Field Museum's huge collections. The varieties of color in nature and the meaning of coloration in plants and animals are closely examined. March 10 through October 10. Hall 25. "To See Or Not To See," Spring Journey for Children, begins March 10. Youngsters learn about the diversity of colors and color patterns of selected animals, as well as the advantages of mimicry and pigmentation changes, with the aid of a questionnaire. All boys and girls who can read and write may participate in the free program. Journey sheets are available at Museum entrances. Through May 31. March 6 Spring Film-Lecture Series resumes with "The New Israel," narrated by Ray Green. A vivid and up-to-date portrayal of this ancient land and its people, that is a blend of the past and the present. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. March 13 Spring Film-Lecture Series continues with "The Call of the Running Tide," narrated by Stanton Waterman. Photographed in the islands of French Polynesia, much of it on sea bottom and along barrier reefs, it is a revealing study of the inhabitants and the many forms of sea-life surrounding them. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. March 20 Spring Film-Lecture Series presents "Uganda — Land of Stanley and Livingston," narrated by William Stockdale. Scenes of wildlife, the wonders of national parks and the people in the cities and remote areas. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. March 27 Spring Film-Lecture Series offers "Sweden Year Around," narrated by Ed Lark. All four seasons are encompassed in this motion picture journey to the land of the midnight sun. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. y .^ jiume 42, Number 3 iield Museum q|lif»tural History 11^ 1 {h ■■|k^>rthe patterning of '^Fiuntan behavior might be explained by the archaeological record. Cover: The Revolution in Archaeology. Photo at right courtesy Institute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology. BULLETIN Volume 42, Nunnber 3 March 1971 2 The Revolution in Archaeology Paul S. Martin it may yield results that help to explain contemporary world problems 8 International Nature Photography Exhibition William C. Burger nature's beauty and diversity on film 12 Fieldiana Patricia M. Williams the Museum's contributions to science that the public seldom sees 14 Field Briefs 16 Letters Calendar Field Museum of Natural History Director, E. Leiand Webber Editor Joyce Zibro; Associate Editor Elizabeth Munger; Staff Writer Madge Jacobs; Production Russ Becker; Photography John Bayalis, Fred Huysmans. The Bulletin is published monthly by Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605. Subscrip- tions: $9 a year; $3 a year for schools. Members of the Museum subscribe through Museum membership. Opinions expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policy of Field Museum. Unsolicited manuscripts are welcome. Printed by Field Museum Press. Application to mail at second-class postage rates is pending at Chicago, Illinois. Postmaster: Please send form 3579 to Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605. Bulletin March 1971 The Revolution, c K<^ .a 1^. Up to and including 1960, I pursued four goals: (1) the application of palynology; (2) thie closing of the gaps in the archaeological record by working in relatively unexplored areas; (3) a historical reconstruction of the relationship between the prehistoric "cultures" of eastern Arizona and the historic Hopi and Zuni cultures; and (4) the establishment of a stratigraphy of traits for the area. In connmon with most of my colleagues, I had emphasized culture traits, trait lists, histories of sites and/or areas — all organized in a time-space dimension. I entertained the illusion that the facts would speak for themselves. I was carrying on "normal science," or solving jig-saw puzzles. Since 1960, my goals and interests have been modified by the trend that is spreading across the country — a trend that symbolizes a shift from emphasis on particularisms to an imaginative era in which we build a cultural-materialist research strategy that can deal with the questions of causality and origins and laws. The trend toward a re-examination of goals, research methodology, and paradigms seems apparent in other fields — sociology, linguistics, geology, biochemistry, and physical anthropology — to mention only a few. As a result, I have substantially altered the bearing, emphasis, and procedures of my research. Thus, a conceptual transformation, a revolution, has taken place for me. In 1961-62, the subject matter of my researches changed slightly — to wit: I developed the desire for information on cultural ecology of eastern Arizona; but I was still concerned with the L^^^^ 1 1 historical relationships mentioned above. Further, I expanded my interest in the stylistic traits of the "Snowflake culture" in Arizona and its ties with both Its Anasazi and its Mogollon neighbors. By 1963-64, substantial changes appeared in my research design. I was still committed to the old stance on writing the "culture history" of our eastern Arizona area. Two new dimensions, however, were added. One was theoretical; it consisted of focusing on culture, not as an aggregation of traits but as an adaptive mechanism that permitted man to cope with the daily problems of living. The facets of culture were sub-divided: (a) sociologic, (b) economic, and (c) ideologic. The other dimension was methodological. It was concerned with sophisticated statistical techniques, sampling, statistical models, and computer aid at all levels of research. It was not, as is naively assumed, "computer archaeology," for there is no such thing. These shifts hastened to displace my old interest in regional cultural history by the analysis of individual sites as socio-cultural adaptations — as on-going social systems. By studying the patterns of culture represented by the distributions of artifacts at each site, I hoped to make contributions to anthropology. In 1965, many of these emerging trends had become more solid and firm. If a site represented a once flourishing social system, I felt we should analyze it by asking questions about the subsystems of which it was composed. I focused not upon traits but upon the patterned co-variation of groups of traits. I studied ecological, sociological, technological, economic, and ideological problems. I set contributions to the understanding of human behavior as the primary goal. n Archaeology Paul S. Martin I now feel in a better position to make contributions to anthropology. I now regard the use of logic and of scientific methods as the minimum acceptable standard for good archaeology. By this I mean the procedure of advancing a hypothesis (defined as a statement of relationship between two or more variables) to explain observed data or behavior. By the interchange of deduction and induction, the hypothesis can and must be tested with independent but relevant data. Thus, by taking as our hypotheses general propositions concerning causes for culture change, we shall be able to make contributions to anthropology, to formulate probabilistic laws of cultural dynamics, the results of which may be relevant to contemporary world problems. In describing this adaptation to my physical, social, and intellectual environment, I shall try to explain how this revolution came about. I do this, not because my metamorphosis is important to anyone but myself, but because the changes that I describe are the product of the dissatisfactions shared by many archaeologists. This essay may be of help to younger, creative men who recognize that something is lacking in their research strategies but who do not quite know how to remedy it. Some years ago, Robert Maynard Hutchins is alleged to have described archaeology as a "tool course" that belonged in the curricula of vocational schools and not in those of a university. This scornful evaluation really racked me, but it had enough truth in it to make it impossible to disregard. Actually, he was not far off target, especially when one recalls the then- current definitions of archaeology: — Archaeology, the science of what Is old In the career of humanity, especially as revealed by excavations ot the sites of prehistoric occupation. Archaeology, of course, Is a sort ot unwritten history. — Archaeology deals with the beginnings of culture and with those phases of culture which are now extinct. — Archaeology reconstructs human history from earliest times to the present. It Is concerned with the beginnings of culture and also with cultures and civilizations that are now extinct. In general, then, there was agreement among most American archaeologists that archaeology was concerned with reconstruction of culture history and lifeways as well as with the delineation of cultural processes. We had a model tor working out culture history, but lacked a model for explaining culture change. We were slowly realizing the importance of understanding cultural processes over vast periods of time. These goals of archaeology had at one time been satisfactory as paradigms; but, gradually, the mortar fell out of the joints of our "edifice"! Crucial questions arose which could not be answered with the existing models. For instance, why did the mobile hunting-gathering culture of the Southwest change to a sedentary one; or why did cultures of fVlesoamerica become urban? These are specific instances of a more general question: Under what conditions do changes in adaptive strategies occur? It appears that strategy shifts occur when there are major changes in population, integration, technology, or differentiation — particularly, the latter two. I began to feel that our research was futile; we were, in fact, not increasing our knowledge of the past nor applying it to contemporary problems of our society. At this time, a crisis took place in my professional career. I had been vaguely aware of new trends, of fresh breezes that were disturbing my mouldering ideas. I finally awakened to the fact that I had to resolve this crisis either by catching up with what was going on, or by resigning myself to becoming a fossil. I must admit that at first the different ideas and approaches outraged me. I was hostile to them, probably because a 35-year professional investment was at stake. I was afraid of things strange and new. It is not uncommon for scientists to resist scientific discoveries. Long before my dissatisfaction and unfulfillment became articulate, a few archaeologists and anthropologists from 1930 on had concluded that our traditional methods were leading them astray, down dead ends, and up against blank walls. It was borne in on these disaffected students that archaeology is part of anthropology and is, therefore, a social science. As practiced, however, it was at best a stunted history and presentation of facts for their own sake; and, at worst, a kind of stamp-collecting pursuit. The interpretation of interrelationships of events, time, and space could go on ad Infinitum and never get anywhere. As one archaeologist put it, our accomplishments were "sterile Bulletin March 1971 Archaeology methodological virtuosity." We were in a cul de sac because comparing forms and systematizing our data were not leading to an elucidation of the structure of social systems any more than did the ordering and taxonomy of life forms by Linnaeus explain the process of organic evolution. We archaeologists were confronted with the bewildering and perplexing fact of a disparity between what we wanted to accomplish — an explanation of why cultures change — and what we were actually doing — histories of sites. For example, we recognized, though dimly, the desirability of explaining past cultural processes, but a research strategy for conducting such studies had not been developed in archaeological theory. In fact, we had no theory and we lacked goals. We were in a vexing and painful predicament. We were digging up sites, towns, and cities; classifying pottery and tools with a fatuous obsession; dating places and things; writing reports and arriving nowhere. Rarely were explanations and predictions attempted; seldom, generalizations or probabilistic laws. True, archaeology had contributed significantly to general knowledge: it had established the probable antiquity and origin of man; it had contributed substantially to the delineation of Biblical and Grecian history; it had made a significant start toward defining the origin and antiquity of the American Indians; it had demonstrated the separate development of cultures in the Old and New World; it had outlined the evolution of cultures, the origins of agriculture, and the development of systems of writing; it had aided in the destruction of many myths and much folklore concerning giants, races, and human origins. I do not disparage or belittle these achievements. They were not, however, explaining, predicting, or clarifying cultural phenomena; they were not concerned with contemporary problems of behavioral science; and, finally, they were not helping man to understand and to interpret his world. Clearly, this impasse would be resolved as it always has been in science — by the emergence of a new paradigm. This one would not be an extension of the older models that had guided us, but would be, rather, a reconstruction of the field from new fundamentals. As I look back with the benefit of hindsight, I think we began to realize that goals (explanations), investigative techniques, and collecting of data are not independent variables. On the contrary, they stand in a dependent relationship, one to the other. After that, a temporary agreement about what constitutes good research strategy and what results were acceptable came slowly into being. Then, in 1961, by good fortune I was launched into a new stream of events that was to bring me hope of renewed progress and meaning in archaeology. Lewis R. Binford, a student of Leslie A. White, and his students were discovering what others had stumbled on, namely that the traditional ways of archaeology were unpromising and ineffective. Fortunately, they were not deeply committed to the establishment; they perceived that the old rules no longer "defined a playable game." It is interesting to note that, as was true of other great innovators, they were young. At this time, four of Binford's students — James A. Brown, Leslie G. Freeman, James N. Hill, and William A. Longacre — were collaborating with me in archaeological analyses. They showed me how we could build on what had been done and how advances could be made. They were kind, patient, stimulating mentors. 1 perked up. 1 listened. I attended seminars. I reread. 1 found most of the theories and practices of the past obsolete. I slowly became acquainted with new concepts and with the need for employing new and methodologically sophisticated techniques of data acquisition and analysis. I began to perceive what is meant by the nature of scientific explanations and devices for systematizing knowledge. Hence, a small group of archaeologists in various parts oi' the country accepted cultural-materialism as a valid strategy. They rejected historical-particularism; they stressed the need for devising a research design that would conform to uniform or accepted rationales on which to base acceptance or rejection of hypotheses. This group, and I now consider myself part of it, has re-oriented its theoretical and Bulletin March 1971 methodological systems. These men are creating a new paradigm. This change may not seem to some so profound as the shift from geocentrism to heliocentrism or those changes brought about by Kepler, Newton, or Boyle, to name but a few. The point I wish to stress is that a new paradigm permits one to see things differently today than one did yesterday, even if and when looking at the same phenomena. Let us consider two men looking at the console of a large pipe-organ. One man is an organist; the other, unlearned musically. The organist instantly "sees" many things: the various manuals (keyboards) as representing separate organs — the solo, the swell, the great, the choir, and the pedal keyboard, on which the feet play; the stops, each controlling a single rank or multiple ranks of pipes; the couplers, the thumb pistons, toe studs, expression pedals, and more. The non-organist is looking at the same details, but is not seeing that a certain stop will produce a loud tone or one of a deep pitch or that one's feet can "play" the pedals as nimbly as one's fingers. All he sees is a complex looking "thing" with black and white keys, strange looking knobs en masse, a bench, and a rack. They are not both visually aware of the same object. The non-organist must learn music and study the organ before he can see (hear, feel, sense) what the organist sees. Thus, the two men may be said to have vastly different conceptual organizations and, since their visual fields have a different organization, they observe different things. So it is that the archaeologist armed with a different conceptual organization and a new paradigm can now see in familiar objects what no one else has seen before. He has a new way of thinking about his universe; he knows now how to "see" ancient sites, stratigraphy, stone tools, in a new and meaningful perspective. For example, I used to be a virtuoso of pottery types. Given almost any sherd from the southwestern United States, I could place it spatially and temporally. But I was unable to tell you a thing about the interrelationship of shapes, designs, types, and functions. I had not "seen" that a given pottery type x might have been used almost exclusively for ritual or burial purposes. Nor did it ever occur to me to postulate that pottery was more than a type or that it represented part of an articulated system that had been adapted by man to his environment in order to carry on the business of living. I was unable to see that the patterning of human behavior might be explained by the variability in the archaeological record. The force of what I am trying to make clear about the ability to "see" may be made clearer by examples. It is said that prior to the time of Copernicus, western astronomers, obsessed by the Ptolemaic model, regarded the heavens as immutable; whereas the Chinese astronomers during the same centuries (prior to A.D. 1500) had recorded the appearances of new stars (novae), comets, and sun-spots. In other words, the Ptolemaic model held by western astronomers prevented them from actually observing what was there to see. Their model blinded them. By the same token, our models and our hypotheses must be created in such a way as to include multi-variate explanations in order that we may not be blind to reality. The paradigm within which we work determines what one is going to "see" — to observe. Thus, as a result of a new paradigm, I live and work in a different world. The new paradigm that has emerged was a direct response to the crisis that had arisen because the traditional archaeological paradigm was askew. This kind of crisis leads to a scientific revolution. What, then, are some aspects of this revolution-inciting paradigm and how is archaeology redefined? To claim that some archaeologists have adopted a new paradigm is equivalent to asserting that when they look at their world they see something new and different. If the claim is true, Bulletin March 1971 Archaeology then I should be able to specify some of the principal changes in their conceptual organizations and the different things they observe. I think it is possible to point out some of the major differences. According to the old view, archaeology was defined as a special kind of history. Data were regarded primarily as the function and result of unique events, and the task of the archaeologist was to collect random facts and create a reconstruction of past events and of by-gone life-ways. A whole was to be formed from random data. According to the new view, archaeology is a science, for "science" includes not only physical and biological fields but also the social sciences — anthropology, sociology, economics. Even historical inquiry does not differ radically from the generalizing natural or social sciences, in respect to either the logical patterns of its explanations or the logical structures of its concepts. Archaeologists must now regard data as unique expressions of recurring cultural processes. Understanding data is worthwhile primarily as a means of understanding these recurring processes. In the old view, reports or monographs concerned with archaeological survey and/or complete descriptions of all recovered data from a site were considered all-important. Usually, such reports included a history of the region or a reconstruction of the history of a site. In a sense, it was at best highly sophisticated antiquarianism. In the new view, the function of science — and hence of archaeology — is to establish general laws covering the behavior of the observed events or objects with which the science in question is concerned. This enables us to connect our knowledge of separated events and to make reliable predictions about other events. Statements with a high degree of probability covering a broad range of phenomena are among the important aims of science. Our ultimate goal in anthropology and archaeology is to formulate laws of cultural dynamics; to seek trends and causes of human behavior; and, as noted above, to make probabilistic predictions. To apply this to an archaeological situation is neither difficult nor impossible. Human behavior is patterned (demonstrable and demonstrated); and if the patterning has not been disturbed by erosion, plough, or pot-hunters, it can be recovered by proper techniques of limited excavation, that is, by an adequately designed sampling procedure. Data relevant to all parts of the extinct socio-cultural system are preserved. We have only to devise a proper definition of culture and appropriate techniques for extracting this information from the extant data. Thus, a systems approach to culture permits us to view a site at a single point in time. When one system is compared to another, we perceive process at work — that is, change with or without continuity. By process, I mean the analysis of a system at one point in time and at one place, and how it is transformed into a different system in the same area at a later time. The comparison of systems — not individual "traits" — provides data for understanding trends and for comprehending regularities. Once these are comprehended, one can make probabilistic predictions. Under the old view, culture was defined implicitly or explicitly as a set or an association of traits, qualities, properties, or features. Arrowheads, pots, houses, firepits, orientation of the dead, bone tools, manos, axes, ornaments — all of these and hundreds more are traits. Thus, archaeologists spoke of the Effigy Mound "culture," the Desert "culture," the Beaker "culture," the Megalithic "culture." Each of these was characterized as possessing certain traits that set it off from all other neighboring or distant "cultures." Archaeologists even spoke of certain tribes as being the "brown-ware (pottery) people." Minute differences in projectile point shapes were thought of as being important in distinguishing one people from another; and whole migrations of people were postulated on the basis of a single trait or a unique association of traits. Under the new view, culture is thought of as man's extrasomatic adaptation to his total sociological and ecological environment. Prehistoric communities (sites) are studied as whole systems each subsystem — technological, sociological, ideological — of which is a closely knit, interrelated set of functional parts. Patterns of significantly co-varying clusters of stylistic categories and attributes of data derived from all subsystems are sought. From the old view, insofar as archaeology held any logical structures, it was thought to be inductive. To some, it demonstrated a kind of mysticism in that artifacts recovered Bulletin March 1971 from a dig were assumed to speak to the archaeologist who thereby identified himself with the objects (supplemented the real with the ideal). However, facts cannot be expected to unscramble themselves and produce a theory in the same way as scrambled letters in an animated cartoon unscramble and form a word. Random facts were avidly collected in the belief that this was good procedure and that the end (reconstructing prehistoric life-ways) justified the means (haphazard collecting of data, with no goals or hypotheses in mind). From the new view, the time to retool is here. It is the consensus that the fruitful approach to a science of the past (as in all sciences) lies in those systems of logic in which deduction and induction interplay. Archaeology can be structured, it need not be haphazard or vague. Tentative hypotheses may be deductively formulated to give direction to scientific investigation. Such hypotheses determine what data should be collected at a given point in an investigation by means of test implications. It can be shown that the old method of fact collecting is a sterile procedure and produces a morass. Worse, such a procedure will fail to reveal regularities and will lead to no conclusion. (Recently, I heard a colleague describe the data from an impressive series of excavations and then tell his audience that he did not know what to do with these data!) Actually, most archaeologists have prior or implicit ideas and postulates and even derived theories, but they often fail to make these explicit. They shrink from the ridicule that might beset them if they were to make known these hypotheses. It would take but little intellectual shift to train themselves in the hypothetico-deductive approach. They would then realize that hypotheses are formulated or invented to account for observed facts and not the other way around. Our knowledge of the past can only be increased by these procedures of interplay and feedback of deduction- induction, formulating hypotheses concerning human behavior and then testing them by relevant archaeological data. The only limits to increasing our knowledge of the past lie in poor intellectual training and in failing to understand that all archaeological remains have relevance to propositions bearing upon cultural processes and events of past times. The accuracy of our knowledge of the past may be measured by the degree to which our hypotheses about the past are confirmed or rejected. In the light of the above suggestions, we redefine archaeology as a discipline that deals with the socio- cultural systems and cultural processes of the past. Archaeology is a social science because its goal is to explain human behavior. Archaeology is anthropology because it uses the concept of culture. Because these goals are accomplished by using data from the past, the science is archaeology. Using data from the past, however, does not make it a type of history. It is not history because archaeology deals with general relationships between variables of human behavior, and not with explaining sequences of unique events. The new paradigm does not resolve any problems. Its value rests in the fact that it revolutionizes our methods of thinking and permits us to view our inquiries in a different way and with greater scope. It is a new way of regarding the problems of archaeology. It is high time that archaeologists make use of the new research tools given them by the logic and structure of science. Although I have written this essay in the first person, I emphasize that my efforts have been the results of suggestions, collaboration and cooperation v»ith young, ardent, capable, and dedicated scientists — Lewis R. Binford. James A. Brown, Leslie G. Freeman, John M. Fritz. James N. HiU, Mark P. Leone, William A. Longacre. Fred T. Plog. Edwin N. Wilmsen — to name but a few. Adapted and reprinted, by permission of the Society for American Archaeology, from American Antiquity, Volume 36, Number 1. January 1971. Dr. Paul S. Martin is chairman emeritus ol antliropoiogy at Field Museum. Bulletin March 1971 International nature photograp More photographers than ever before this year sent more photographs than ever before to be considered for the 26th Chicago International Exhibition of Nature Photography. Over 4,000 color slides and 400 prints were submitted by some 1,000 photographers from 48 states and many other countries. Field Museum and the Nature Camera Club of Chicago are joint sponsors of this biggest exhibition of nature photography in the v\/orld, held in the Museum. We wish there were space to reproduce more than the four entries shown here. No monetary awards are involved. It is a noncommercial, nonprofessional event. Most entrants are amateur but avid nature photographers. But the honor of having one's work accepted is an acknowledged standard of accomplishment that even some professionals seek. A lot of work is involved in opening boxes, carefully preparing all the slides and prints for judging, showing, and finally returning to their owners. Most of it is done by members of the Nature Camera Club, with assistance by the Museum staff in setting up the exhibit. The challenge of putting nature's beauty and diversity on film makes this hobby so exciting. The reward comes when people respond to an unusual glimpse of nature caught by your camera — something they may otherwise never have seen or noticed. William Burger President, Nature Camera Club of Chicago Bulletin March 1971 iy exhibition 7v«:t-C- ^£' W-^ ->^ ^'^ . :,^- Photos: Sand Curves (page 9), by Alexander Oupper, Lodi, California. Redwood in Fog (page 10), by Dr. Fred Modern. Long Beach, California. Caracal Lynx (page 11), by Earl Kubis, Downers Grove, Illinois. Machaeon Swallowtail (page 11), by Tom Webb, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Bulletin March 1971 11 FIELDIANA Patricia M. Williams Last year was Fieldiana's 75th birthday. In those 75 years Field Museum has published over 1 ,100 issues of Fieldiana. The list of Fieldiana titles stands a towering 22 feet high in the Museum's 75th Anniversary Exhibit and Fieldiana's distribution is worldwide in scope. And yet, unless you're a professional scientist, you may have never even heard of Fieldiana, let alone read a copy. Fieldiana is a continuing series of scientific papers and monographs dealing with anthropology, botany, geology and zoology intended primarily for exchange-distribution to museums, libraries, and universities, but also available for purchase. Fieldiana was begun in what is often referred to as the "Museum Age" — the 1800's. Many of this country's great natural history museums were founded in the nineteenth century and their scientific series began to proliferate toward the end of that century. For example, the Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History first appeared in 1881, the Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum in 1878, the Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections in 1860, and the Contributions from the Gray Herbarium in 1891. Field Museum's Annual Report of the Director for 1895 introduced the series which would one day be called Fieldiana as "the medium of presenting to the world the results of the research and investigation conducted under the auspices of the Museum. The publications are intended primarily to convey information upon the collections and expeditions of the Museum. There is no restriction, however, as to authorship or subject, provided the papers come within the scope of scientific or technical discussion." At that time the Museum itself was still evolving toward its present division of interests and the scientific series reflects this evolution. Then, as now, there was a Botanical, Zoological and Anthropological Series but instead of a Geology series the Museum offered both Historical and Geographical publications. In fact, publications 1, "An Historical and Descriptive Account of the Field Columbian Museum" and 2, "The Authentic Letters of Columbus" were both in the now defunct Historical Series. Fieldiana has reflected not only the growth and development of Field Museum, but of the various sciences as well. For example, anthropology was just emerging as a professional discipline in the United States at the time of Fieldiana's introduction and some of the most important early anthropologists contributed to the series. W. H. Holmes published one of the world's first reports on the archaeology of the Yucatan in the new-born Anthropological Series. G. A. Dorsey contributed several landmark publications on various American Indian tribes, recording firsthand details of ceremonies and myths which were impossible to obtain even a few years later. H. R. Voth, a missionary, recorded descriptions of sacred American Indian ceremonies and his publications are standard references today. Dorsey and Voth published in Field Museum's series between 1897 and 1912. Around 1912 Berthold Laufer, a 12 Bulletin March 1971 scholarly giant of world renown, began to publish. His "Jade, a Study in Chinese Archaeology and Religion" (1912) was one of the first authoritative works on jade and is now a classic. In 1927 J. Eric Thompson published a very short, very technical paper called "A Correlation of Mayan and European Calendars." This calendar, which correlates Christian chronology with Mayan hieroglyphics, continues to be the standard reference point for workers in this field. In 1931 Roy L. Moodie contributed "Roentgenologic Studies of Egyptian and Peruvian Mummies," — one of the first published collections of mummy X-rays. Paul S. Martin, who has published more on the Southwest than any other anthropologist, authored several volumes in the Fieldiana: Anthropology series. Ralph Linton, A. L. Kroeber, W. Hambley, Fay Cooper Cole, and Alexander Spoehr are among the prominent anthropologists who have contributed to Fieldiana in the past. Reviewed in the same detail, the lists of Fieldiana: Botany, Geology, and Zoology are seen to be studded with the names of outstanding scientists advancing new ideas, describing new genera and species. The colossal floras in the Botanical Series are known to botanists the world over and represent the work of many men. The "Flora of Peru," begun in 1936 and still in progress, runs to over 6,000 pages to date. The "Flora of Guatemala," begun in 1957, continues. Just beginning is a series on the flora of Costa Rica to record the remarkable botanical diversity of that area before much is eradicated by encroachment of the human species and its technology. Many of the geology publications have been landmarks in the study of the earth and early life, presenting new concepts, data, techniques, and interpretations. One outstanding example, "The Paleoecological History of Two Pennsylvanlan Black Shales" by Rainer Zangerl and Eugene S. Richardson, is now used as advanced reading in universities. Fieldiana: Zoology is an abundant source of descriptive and interpretative material dealing with insects, invertebrates, and vertebrates from every area of the world. W. H. Osgood and K. P. Schmidt, both former chief curators, were prolific writers and published often in the Fieldiana series. D. Wright Davis' mammoth "The Giant Panda: A Morphological Study of Evolutionary Mechanisms" is certainly one of the most noteworthy issues of Fieldiana from a standpoint of both quality and size (339 quarto pages, 160 illustrations). It is largely through such publications that Field Museum's reputation as a scientific institution is maintained and enhanced, that its collections and staff become known to the scientific community. Any title of Fieldiana — dated 1895 or 1971 — can be examined in the Museum library. All that are not out of print are available for purchase. In this age of imperative relevance, Fieldiana is relevant. It describes and interprets our world and its inhabitants as it was and is. For conservationists of both human and natural resources, Fieldiana provides a record of what was so that we can measure what we have changed, improved or destroyed. Fieldiana has been pure science as well — irritating to those who demand "But what can you use it for?" but inspiring to those who appreciate and desire knowledge for its own sake. Patricia M. Williams is managing editor ot scientific publications at Field Museum. Bulletin March 1971 13 Dr. VanStone New Anthropology Department Chairman Dr. James W. VanStone has been named chairman of the Department of Anthropology at Field Museum. He succeeds Dr. Donald Collier, who re-assumes his former position of curator of Middle and South American archaeology and ethnology. The appointment is in accordance with the Museum's new policy of four-year term appointments for the chairmen of its scienfific departments. Dr. VanStone is former curator of North American archaeology and ethnology. He is a member of a joint committee of the Arctic Institute of North America and the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, advising on environmental protection in conjunction with the Trans-Alaska pipeline. The committee, composed of seven northern specialists, reviews the work of the archaeologists hired by the Trans-Alaska Pipeline system. An authority on the peoples of the North American arctic and subarctic, having taught anthropology for eight years at the University Dr. James VanStone of Alaska and seven years at the University of Toronto, Dr. VanStone joined Field Museum's staff four years ago. Francis Brenton Sails Catamaran Back from South America Francis Brenton, voyager, writer, photographer and adventurer, returned recently with more than one hundred artifacts he collected for Field Museum while exploring the jungles of South America. His journey began a year ago at the top of the Amazon, where he purchased a 20-foot dugout to traverse its tributaries. "Collecting in this region," says Brenton, "was from the Rio Ucayali and other rivers branching off the main Amazon River, such as the Mazon, Napo, Loreto, Yavari and half a dozen others. Tribes were mostly Shipibo, Jivaro, Yagua and Tucuna. The artifacts acquired included blowguns, bows and arrows, hammocks, pottery, a headdress, flutes, clothing, medicinal plants, baskets, bags, ankle and wrist ornaments made of jungle seeds, and other similar trinkets." Obtaining another 20-footer at Belem, Brazil, Brenton lashed the two dugouts together to form a catamaran, which he named the Sarape. From Belem, he sailed up the coast to the Guianas and continued to the mouth of the Rio Orinoco in Venezuela. In this area he visited the Guahibo, Makaritari, Piaroa, and Delta Indians, adding more items to his collection along the way. Returning back down the Orinoco, Brenton headed for Trinidad. At this point in his narration he stops to explain, "Anyway. when I reached the Atlantic from the Orinoco, the Sarape started taking on water by the bucketful, through the seams which the ants had eaten clear of calking. The typewriter was thoroughly soaked and I also felt the urge to jettison weight, for I was six to eight miles from land at the time." Brenton was referring to the typewriter he was using to record daily events for his forthcoming book. The Sarape. It went overboard without much further ado. The last thirty days of Brenton's voyage, from Trinidad to Miami, were relatively calm and uneventful. Francis Brenton has soloed the Atlantic three times, twice in dugout canoes. He is the author of A Long Sail to Haiti, and The Voyage of the Sierra Sagrada. Even though his latest expedition is barely over, Brenton is busy making plans for the next one. He will leave Miami soon in the Sarape, sailing up the Inland Waterway to Newport News, from where he will head for Plymouth, England. He expects to sail along the coasts of France and Portugal as far as Madeira, photographing and writing along the way, and looking for new adventure. Francis Brenton and Dr. Donald Collier, curator of Middle and South American archaeology and ethnology, examine blowgun, darts, and manioc squeezer, some of the objects Brenton brought back to the Museum from his most recent voyage. Rock Hounds Honor Dr. Richardson Dr. Eugene S. Richardson, Jr., curator of invertebrate fossils, has been honored by the American Federation of Mineralogical Societies. The Scholarship Foundation of this nationwide federation of rock hound groups, encompassing 60,000 members, voted their annual Scholarship Foundation Award to him for 1971, "for outstanding achievement in the field of Earth Sciences." Dr. Richardson will thus have the privilege of selecting schools that will receive grants from the Foundation to assist six graduate students for two years each in their work toward a master's or doctor's degree in any of the earth sciences. The substantial resources of the Foundation that make these grants possible have been accumulated over the years through many small fund-raising activities of the local societies and contributions of the members. The Foundation president, W. H. de Neul, wrote that "Dr. Richardson's selection to receive this honor is particularly gratifying; he has done so much to further among the 'common men' the interest in paleontology, we can think of no one that is more worthy of the Award. He regularly and frequently lectures to Chicago area audiences and works closely with local club members in their search of the strip coal mining area southwest of Chicago, which has produced so many spectacular paleontological finds." In addition to his active professional writing and other work, Dr. Richardson has indeed contributed much to the activities of these 14 Bulletin March 1971 eager nonprofessional groups. He is advisory editor of paleontology for Earth Science Magazine, and an honorary member of tfie Midwest Federation of Mineralogical Societies, the Lake County Gem & Mineral Society (Waukegan), the Earth Science Club of Northern Illinois, and the Chicago Rocks & Minerals Society. Geology Field Trip Details of the April geology field trip to the Ozarks will be explained to all prospective participants on Saturday, March 20 at 10:30 A.M. at 65 East South Water Street. The group will fly to St. Louis on Sunday, April 4 and return to Chicago Saturday, April 10. A chartered bus will transport participants into the field. Four long hikes will require hiking clothes. Tuition of $160 will include air transportation, the chartered bus in Missouri, and all meals. (Members of the Museum are entitled to 10% discount.) Hotel reservations will be made for the group and will be an additional $5 to $8 a day. The trip is non-credit course N963 offered by the University of Chicago Extension in cooperation with the Department of Education of the Field Museum of Natural History. Matthew H. Nitecki, associate curator in the Museum's Department of Geology, will conduct the course. Arrangements to join the group should be made by calling Mrs. Marie Matyas, University of Chicago Extension, at Financial 6-8300. Hans Conried Visits Field Museum Christopher C. Legge. custodian of anthropological collections, shows Hans Conried, the well known actor, a necklace that once belonged to Quanah Parker, one of the most warlike chiefs of the Comanche Indians. Said Mr. Conried during his recent visit, "I have been coming here for many years — whenever I am in town. Field Museum is one of the greatest museums in the world." Wood Collection Contributed to Agriculture Department Field Museum recently transferred its worldwide wood collection of more than 20,000 specimens to the Forest Products Laboratory of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service at Madison, Wisconsin. The gift was made possible through the efforts of Dr. Louis 0. Williams, chairman of the Museum's Department of Botany. With this acquisition, the extensive Forest Products Laboratory collection, which includes the Samuel James Record collection acquired from Yale University in 1969, now totals about 100,000 specimens of wood from every major forest area in the world, making it the world's largest research collection of woods. The original set of voucher specimens (specimens of leaves, stems, flowers and fruits mounted on herbarium sheets) for Field Museum's wood collection remains available in its herbarium for study purposes, together with the original voucher specimens for many of the woods from the Samuel James Record collection, determined by Paul C. Standley, outstanding authority on tropical American botany who spent a "life time" at Field Museum. More recent vouchers from Forest Products Laboratory's valuable acquisitions in Peru have been determined and the study set and types deposited in Field Museum's herbarium. Duplicate specimens of many of these recent Peruvian collections have been distributed to other scientific institutions, including Peruvian, by Field Museum. NSF Grant for Archaeology Program A grant of $22,000 has been awarded Field Museum by the National Science Foundation for support of its "New Perspectives in Archaeology" 1971 summer program for high ability college sophomores and juniors. This special program has been conducted at the Museum's field station at Vernon, Arizona since 1964 under a National Science Foundation grant for undergraduate participation. The project Is under the direction of Dr. Paul S. Martin, chairman emeritus of anthropology at Field Museum. Students selected to participate In the ten-week session will be Involved in excavation, reconnaissance, and research into the prehistory of the Southwest. Each student will conceive and execute an independent research project. He will generate an hypothesis, gather data to test it, and demonstrate laws concerning human behavior. Dr. Martin believes such laws may throw light on contemporary world problems. Dr. Martin has worked in the Southwest for over forty years. His published reports on archaeological sites in New Mexico, Colorado, and eastern Arizona have filled a dozen volumes of Field Museum's scientific series Fieldiana: Anthropology. In 1968 he received the Alfred Vincent Kidder Award for outstanding contributions to American archaeology. An article by Dr. Martin is featured in this issue of the Bulletin. McCormick Trust Gift Stanley Armstrong, executive director of the Robert R. McCormick Charitable Trust, and E. Leiand Webber, director of Field Museum, look over construction work in a light well area at Field Museum where much-needed additional office and research space is being created for the scientific departments. McCormick Trust contributed $150,000 for the remodeling, in addition to a previous gift of $300,000 for new facilities for the Exhibition Department. TWO NIGHTS TO REMEMBER! This year. Members' Night will be held on May 6 and 7, to take care of over-flow crowds and to give members a chance to participate In all of the special activities. All events will be the same for both evenings. Be sure to mark your calendar. Bulletin March 1971 15 LETTERS To the editor: I cannot help but react to the letter written by R. B. Ayres in response to Dr. P. Ehrlich's population article. Mr. Ayres begins with the false assumption that the population crisis is a problem only for the rest of the world. In fact, that is the least of the problem. A child born in the developed countries (the U.S., W. Europe and Japan) will, in the course of its lifetime, consume 50 times as much of the resources of the world as a child born in the underdeveloped world. Clearly, it is this country that is at the heart of the world's crisis. Mr. Ayres also falsely assumes that it is the people of the ghettos that mal^e them such. When trying to arrive at the roots of poverty perhaps Mr. Ayres should ask the landlord who refuses to repair ghetto homes while making an exhorbitant profit off the peoples right to decent housing. Or the real estate agents who refuse to sell or rent to blacks outside the confines of the ghetto, thus creating a trapped colony. Or the white store-owners and corporations that exploit this trapped colony and remove its wealth to the suburb. All of Mr. Ayres' assumptions add up to a blatantly racist analysis of the world. One in which the white man is culturally and racially superior to both the underdeveloped world and the black colony at home. Finally, by denying any political role in social reality, Mr. Ayres assures us of his applause of racism, slavery and exploitation. 1 would suggest that perhaps he has been in the Arizona sun too long and is so far removed from reality that his bigotry is perverse. John L Lawrencen Associate Professor of Antfiropology U.C.L.A. To the editor: Another vote in favor of continued information about the population problems. In fact two votes. My husband and I agree completely with Mr. Alan Garrett's letter in the January, 1971 Bultetin. We have only been readers of this publication for a year or so and look forward to every issue. Mrs. Lawrence C. Burns Winnetka, fllinois To the editor: I have just read the article "Canning a legend." As a human being and a dog owner and an animal lover I feel deeply disturbed. I hardly ever feed my dog canned food, but all the same how can I find out which firms use "wild horses?" Or do all of them? Is there anything one can do apart from donating money when you see an advert in a paper? I wish one could advertise the facts pictorially on television — on the same channels that advertise dog food. I think ali hunting or hounding by plane should be forbidden, but what can I do about it? Rutti Duckworth Chicago Editor's note: The International Society for the Protection of Mustangs and Burros is one organization that would welcome interest and support. It can be addressed in care of Mrs. Helen A. Reilly, Badger, California 93603. Hope Ryden in her book America's Last Wild l-lorses identifies several others, and also prints Senate Bill 3358, introduced by Wyoming's Senator Clifford P. Hansen last year, "to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to protect, manage, and control free-roaming horses and burros on public lands." The bill was read twice and referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Please address all letters to the editor to Bufletin Field Museum of Natural History Roosevelt Road and Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length. ™jr— ' » . ; ■ ■ ■■'■■ ' — ^ K:anoinavia: refreshing lands of ■fjords & MIDNIGHT SUN fjUNE 8 -JULY 2, 1971 $2,405 (INCLUDES A $500 TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION) Fjords, outdoor museums, gardens, wildflowers, birds, archaeological sites, - architecture, design, Linnaeus' gardens, ; great cathedrals, historic palaces, j opera, midnight sun in Lappland, ' reindeer: Bergen, Oslo, Helsinki, Tapiola, • Lake Inari, Stockholm, Gotland Island, Uppsala, Gothenburg, Kattegat, Halsingborg, Norrviken, Sofiero, Bosjokloster, Lund, Helsinfors, Copenhagen. WRITE: FIELD MUSEUM WORLDWIDE NATURAL HISTORY TOURS ROOSEVELT RD. AT LAKE SHORE DR. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60605 16 Bulletin March 1971 CALENDAR HOURS 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday-Thursday 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Friday The Museum Library is open 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Spring Film-Lecture Series, presented at 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre March 6 "The New Israel," narrated by Ray Green. A vivid and up-to-date portrayal of this ancient land and its people, that is a blend of the past and the present. March 13 "The Call of the Running Tide," narrated by Stanton Waterman. Photographed in the islands of French Polynesia, much of it on sea bottom and along barrier reefs, it is a revealing study of the inhabitants and the many forms of sea-life surrounding them. March 20 "Uganda — Land of Stanley and Livingston," narrated by William Stockdale. Scenes of vifildlife, the wonders of national parks and the people in the cities and remote areas. March 27 "Sweden Year Around," narrated by Ed Lark. All four seasons are encompassed in this motion picture journey to the land of the midnight sun. CONTINUING John James Audubon's elephant folio. The Birds ot America, on display in the North Lounge. A different plate from the rare, first-edition set is featured each day. 7Sth Anniversary Exhibit: A Sense of Wonder, A Sense of History, A Sense of Discovery, continues indefinitely. New and exciting display techniques explore Field Museum's past and present and current research projects. Hall 3. THROUGH MARCH 10 "Exploring Indian Country," Winter Journey for Children. The free, self-guided tour enables youngsters to see American Indians of three environments as the early explorers saw them. All boys and girls who can read and write may participate. Journey sheets are available at Museum entrances. BEGINS MARCH 11 Color In Nature, an exhibit of broad scope that uses examples from Field Museum's huge collections to explore the nature and variety of color in the physical and living world around us. It examines the meaning of color In the reproduction, survival and evolution of plants and animals by focusing on its many roles — as in mimicry, camouflage, warning, sexual recognition and selection, energy channeling and vitamin production. Through October 10. A male Greater Bird of Paradise, held by Dr. Rupert L. Wenzel. chairman of the Department of Zoology, displays his bright colors for the favor of female birds. "To See or Not to See," Spring Journey for Children, helps them learn about the diversity of colors and color patterns of selected animals, as well as the advantages of mimicry and pigmentation changes, with the aid of a questionnaire. All youngsters who can read and write may participate in the free program. Journey sheets are available at Museum entrances. Through May 31 . THROUGH MARCH 21 Catalogue of the Different Specimens of Clotti Collected in the Three Voyages of Captain Cook, to the Southern Hemisphere, London, Alexander Shaw, 1787, shown in the South Lounge. The rare copy consists of actual tapa cloth specimens collected during Captain Cook's voyages to the South Seas (1768-1780). The volume is the gift of Mrs. A. W. F. Fuller. Life in Other Worlds? An exhibit of the Murchison meteorite, a Type II carbonaceous chondrite, of which only 14 exist out of the almost 2,000 known meteorites. Recently, amino acids, possible building blocks of life, have been reported in this meteorite. South Lounge. BEGINS MARCH 22 A rare, wild albino mink, in a special display in the South Lounge. This almost adult female specimen is the gift of Terry L. Perry of Johnston, Iowa, who captured it about 16 months ago. Through May 16. MARCH 28 "The Bahamas," a free wildlife film, offered by the Illinois Audubon Society. 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. Meetings March 9: 7:45 p.m.. Nature Camera Club of Chicago (Everybody is welcome) March 9: 8 p.m., Chicagoland Glider Council March 10: 7 p.m., Chicago Ornithological Society March 10: 7:30 p.m., Windy City Grotto — National Speleological Society March 11: 8 p.m., Chicago Mountaineering Club March 14: 2 p.m., Chicago Shell Club March 16: 7:30 p.m., Chicago Area Camera Clubs Association March 21: 2 p.m., Illinois Orchid Society COMING IN APRIL The Afro-American Style, from the Design Works of Bedford-Stuyvesant, an exhibit of hand-printed textiles blending classical African motifs and contemporary design. April 7 through September 12. Hall 9. Spring Children's Programs at 10:30 a.m., James Simpson Theatre. April 3: Honor day for Cub Scouts and film program April 17: Film program April 24: Museum Traveler Day with Journey awards and film program Spring Film-Lecture Series presented at 2:30 p.m., James Simpson Theatre. April 3: "Stone Age New Guiana," with Lewis Cotlow April 10: "Rajasthan: India's Desert State," with Len Stuttman April 17: "The Right to Live," with C. P. Lyons April 24: "Adriatic Italy," with Al Wolff Volume 42, Number 4 April 1971 Field Museum of Natural History B U L — :> • BULLETIN Volume 42, Number 4 April 1971 Cover: Flower motif found In designs on pages 2, 4, and 5 enlarged. 2 Afro-American Style from The Design Works of Bedford-Stuyvesant Joyce Zibro African art from the Museum's famous Benin collection inspires designs for silk-screened textiles produced by a new community- rooted company in Brool