Ap yee Pept ar beg UES bata.) yet! Besa tS bahay ee ny a iN ate Pet he ae SASL LE tty Tie eH Hist ny Sylubp? pata Sates aelstyt hts tar PN ftyty ft aS oe et beba AUS us . Beg) Per stery UNH ea Keys utes) Save estas ARUN , hgtet? it qe Pe 3 Oe H :) A RYVRP VT Ary WHAT Paantah at yt pet pte Rela ara Hiasas i? stb ts ba! pak r f nates witha y + > Ree LORE sit ed oh spt > ¥ ap i bp went, ns Pn WS se gee se oar See “ye = me j 4 i } ) 4 ‘ as ‘i Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology series Vol 31 1979 British Museum (Natural History) London 1979 Dates of publication of the parts No 1 : ‘ : : j : : : : ; 29 March 1979 No 2 , F : : : : : : : : 29 March 1979 Nos : ; : : : : E ; : 26 April 1979 No4 . : : : : ; ; : : : 31 May 1979 ISSN 0007-1471 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Ltd, at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, Dorset No 1 No 2 No 3 No 4 Contents Geology Volume 31 Page Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson . ‘ : ‘ : 3 Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. W. J. Kennedy & H.C. Klinger . : ; 5 : : » Wil Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. R. Watkins : ; : : : : : 5 5 eS The ammonites of the sa Chalk Rock eae ee C.W. Wright. ! , 5 PASI r | 4 i sy i ght 3 te x oS J = A 5 uF aol st eee iT sa = 2 > iegleli% env’ age) ee Tiere he wien i ae me | . 5 | Seat v Tay) itp iy oan i ‘ v4 .. el ks : _ | ay 5) lg aptemig ig agin’ Ps = iN we i a pi & ae. ee a a _ -— oN Tint aad al Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, | eastern Sabah, Malaysia J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson Geology series Vol 31 No1 29 March 1979 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. Subscription orders and enquiries about back issues should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 SBD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) © Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1979 ISSN 0007-1471 Geology series Vol 31 No 1 pp 1-120 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 SBD Issued 29 March 1979 Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia J. E. Whittaker and R. L. Hodgkinson Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD Contents Synopsis 3 Introduction 3 Acknowledgements 4 Methods 4 Biostratigraphy . 5 Stratigraphy of the Dent Group . 5 Sebahat Formation 5 Ganduman Formation 5 Togopi Formation . 5 Distribution and palaeoecology of the Meconi Foraminifera 8 Age of the Togopi Formation j : 9 Planktonic foraminifera . 9 Benthic foraminifera ; j : : : ; : ; ; 9 Systematics . ‘ : : F i : : ; 5 14 Family Ataxophragmiidae Schwager 3 r ; : : : 3 ; 15 Textilina Nervang . ; é : ‘ ; j : : : 15 Clavulina d’Orbigny ; : ; : : : . ; F ; 16 Family Nubeculariidae Jones. ‘ : ; : : : i : 16 Edentostomina Collins. : : : : ; ? ; x : 16 Spiroloculina d’Orbigny . : ; ; : : : 3 ; : 17 Vertebralina d’Orbigny . i 5 : , 5 5 : ; ; 19 Family Miliolidae Ehrenberg : 3 ‘ é : ; ‘ : : 20 Quinqueloculina d’Orbigny j : 3 : ‘ : : : : 20 Pseudomassilina Lacroix . 3 : ; : é ; : ; : 31 Pyrgo Defrance . ; : : : : : ‘ ; j , 33 Triloculina d’Orbigny . 5 ‘ : : ; 4 F i : 34 Miliolinella Wiesner : : ‘ : ‘ : ; : : 37 Hauerina @Orbigny in de la Sagra : ‘ ; : 3 é : ‘ 37 Schlumbergerina Munier-Chalmas_ . : ; é 3 : : : 40 Family Soritidae Ehrenberg : ; : : : : ; ; ; 41 Peneroplis de Montfort . ; A : 3 : x : : : 41 Dendritina @Orbigny . ; 5 : ‘ ; 5 3 ; ‘ 41 Marginopora de Blainville ; : ; ; ; ; : : : 42 Family Alveolinidae Ehrenberg . ; , f ‘ F ‘ ; : 42 Alveolinella Douvillé , , j 5 F ; é ‘ : 42 Family Nodosariidae Ehrenberg . : : ; . ; ; : , 43 Lagena Walker & Jacob in Kanmacher . ; A : i é ‘ 43 Pseudonodosaria Boomgaart . : : x : : j . : 48 Family Polymorphinidae d’Orbigny . : , : ‘ : ‘ : 49 Guttulina d’Orbigny ; ‘ : : a ‘ P i ; 49 Sigmoidella Cushman & Ozawa : ‘ : : ‘ ‘ ; : 50 Family Glandulinidae Reuss j ? . : : : ‘ ; 51 Glandulina d’Orbigny in de la Sagra ‘5 ‘ a ‘ : : : 51 Oolina d@’Orbigny . : 3 : ; 3 . , : . 52) Fissurina Reuss . : . j ; ‘ ‘ j ; : . 52 Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 31 (1): 1-120 Issued 29 March, 1979 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Family Bolivinitidae Cushman Bolivina @ Orbigny Brizalina Costa : Rectobolivina Cushman . Family Buliminidae Jones . Pavonina d@’Orbigny Chrysalidinella Schubert . Reussella Galloway Family Uvigerinidae Haeckel Siphogenerina Schlumberger in Milne-Edwards Siphouvigerina Parr Family Discorbidae Ehrenberg Discorbis Lamarck Gavelinopsis Hofker Rosalina @’Orbigny Cancris de Montfort ; Family Glabratellidae Loeblich & Tappan Schackoinella Weinhandl Family Siphoninidae Cushman Siphoninoides Cushman . Family Epistomariidae Hofker Epistomaroides Uchio : Pseudoeponides Uchio in Kawai et ail Family Rotaliidae Ehrenberg Ammonia Briinnich Asterorotalia Hofker Pararotalia Le Calvez : Pseudorotalia Reiss & Merling. Family Calcarinidae Schwager Calcarina d’Orbigny Family Elphidiidae Galloway Elphidium de Montfort Cellanthus de Montfort . Cribroelphidium Cushman & Bronnimann . Cribrononion Thalmann . Elphidiella Cushman Parrellina Thalmann Family Nummulitidae de Blainville Nummulites Lamarck 3 Operculina d’Orbigny Heterostegina d’Orbigny . Family Hantkeninidae Cushman . Hastigerina Thomson in Murray Family Globigerinidae Carpenter, Parker & Tones Globigerina d’Orbigny Globigerinoides Cushman Globigerinita Bronnimann Family Eponididae Hofker Poroeponides Cushman : Family Amphisteginidae Cushman Amphistegina d’Orbigny . Family Cibicididae Cushman Caribeanella Bermudez Family Planorbulinidae Schwager Planorbulinella Cushman . Family Acervulinidae Schultze Gypsina Carter Family Cymbaloporidae Guha Cymbaloporetta Cushman FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 3 Family Nonionidae Schultze , : ; : : é : 4 ; 104 Florilus de Montfort F $ F ; 3 5 : : ; 5 104 Family Anomalinidae Cushman . F ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ , 105 Anomalinoides Brotzen . : , F L , : j s : 105 Hanzawaia Asano . : ; : : : ; : : F ‘ 106 Postscript . : : P i 3 : ; , ; : : 3 106 References . : : : ; é : ‘ ‘ : F : ; 107 Index ; ‘ : : : : : 3 ‘ : ; : ‘ 116 Synopsis One hundred and twenty-five species are described and figured from a section in the upper Togopi River, type-locality of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. Eighty-six per cent of the fauna is living today in the area. The following seven species and one variety are new: Ammonia togopiensis, Bolivina sabahensis, Cellanthus biperforatus, C. hailei, Cribroelphidium dentense, Peneroplis planatus var. annulata, Pseudomassilina medioelata and Textilina subrectangularis. Florilus asanoi is proposed as a new name for Nonion japonicum Asano, 1938. The age of the Togopi Formation is reassessed on the basis of benthic foraminifera and is considered to be mainly of Pliocene age. Introduction The Togopi Formation, the uppermost sequence of mainly marine clays making up the Dent Group, is named after the Togopi River, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. The name was first published by Reinhard & Wenk (1951) but it had previously been used in a Sabah Shell Petroleum Company’s (SSPC) internal report as early as 1938. Dr E. Wenk himself made the first collection of fossils (Mollusca) in 1937, some of which were described by Cox (1948). A further collection of macro- fossils was made by P. Collenette in 1950, the Mollusca being listed by Nuttall (1960). Cox dated Wenk’s material, which was dominated by gastropods, as Pliocene or possibly U. Miocene, while Nuttall considered Collenette’s samples to be almost certainly Pleistocene. The former collection came from the Togopi River, but there is some confusion as to the exact provenance of Collenette’s (Nuttall 1965). In 1961 Dr N. S. Haile collected 18 samples from the type area for the Togopi Formation from its supposed boundary with the underlying Ganduman Formation to where it disappears under the coastal alluvia (for details see Haile & Wong 1965). From these Nuttall (1965) listed almost 200 species of Mollusca and after a detailed examination of the fauna assigned a Plio-Pleistocene age, equivalent to the Bantamian—Sondian stages of Java, to the Togopi Formation. Haile & Wong (1965 : 83) list identifications of teleostan otoliths by F. Stinton (Stinton 1963) and echino- derms by R. P. S. Jefferies together with a small foraminiferal fauna, identified by SSPC palaeon- tologists. The foraminifera came from samples collected by Wenk and Parsons between 4 and 13 km west and north-west of Dent Haven, but only a few genera and species were recognized. Eleven of Haile’s original samples were available for micropalaeontological examination, and in view of the richness of the fauna (125 species) it was decided to describe it fully and to attempt an age determination using the smaller benthic foraminifera. Planktonic foraminifera are un- fortunately few in the Togopi Formation. Since 86% of the fauna still lives in the Indo-Pacific today it has also been possible to correct some common misidentifications of Recent species by referring back to the original collections of Brady, Parker & Jones, Carpenter, Williamson and Heron-Allen & Earland which are preserved in the BM(NH). A number of benthic species are now thought to be extinct and these are listed as of possible biostratigraphic use in the future. Four samples from the small Wenk and Collenette collections have been examined for foramini- fera but yielded no additional species. They are not dealt with any further in this paper. The stratigraphy of the Dent Group is first discussed. The ages of the Sebahat and Ganduman Formations given by Haile & Wong (1965) are revised and the foraminiferal faunas reinterpreted in the light of recent advances in Tertiary biostratigraphy. A description of the Togopi strati- graphy and the material from the type-area which forms the basis of this work is then covered 4 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON in detail. The occurrence of the foraminifera is summarized, their palaeoecology considered, and finally the overall evidence of the age of the Togopi Formation is presented. The planktonic foraminifera have been identified and photographed by Mr H. A. Buckley, Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History). Acknowledgements We are indebted to our colleague Dr C. G. Adams for his encouragement and guidance in the preparation of this work and for his careful reading of the manuscript. To Dr D. J. Belford (Bureau of Mineral Resources, Canberra) goes our thanks for valuable discussions and for comparing a number of our species with his own from the Neogene of Papua—New Guinea; Dr R. W. Ponder (James Cook University, Townsville) also contributed a lively correspondence on several problematic species. Dr P. Marshall (formerly of University College, London) provided us with topotypic material of some of d’Orbigny’s Caribbean species, while Dr H. Billman (formerly of the Union Oil Company) is also thanked for his kindness in making available to us examples of index and important marker fossils from the Kutei Basin, Indonesia. Dr R. Cifelli (Smithsonian Institution) readily arranged several loans of type-specimens. Dr J. R. Haynes (University College of Wales, Aberystwyth) gave us many helpful suggestions on taxonomic matters, while our colleague Mr C. P. Nuttall provided valuable information on the Togopi samples and their molluscan faunas. The photography was undertaken by the senior author and by members of the Department of Central Services, British Museum (Natural History); to the latter we are especially indebted for their careful work. Some technical assistance was provided by Miss C. A. Harrison and, in the early stages, by Mr D. I. Dixon, formerly of the Museum’s staff. Mrs E. M. Richards typed the manuscript. Methods The dry clay samples were disaggregated by boiling in a weak solution of hydrogen peroxide. The sediment was then washed through a series of sieves, the finest being 200 mesh (aperture: 75 microns), and dried. The original weight of the samples is not known, having first been ex- amined for mollusca; however, the amount of material processed in the present study varied between 200 and 700 gm, five of the samples weighing approximately 400 gm. In order to speed up the examination process, the residue, obviously variable depending on the size of the clay fraction, was halved or quartered, and half (or a quarter) subjected to carbon tetrachloride flotation. Where the residue was large the flotation process was repeated and in the coarsest grade, when large specimens were present, bromoform was used. As no statistical study was to be attempted, only the floated portion and its residue were examined. The friable limestones (NB 9446, NB 9448) and part of the sandstone (NB 9453) were either crushed and washed, or sectioned. Internal structures of the foraminifera were examined: (a) by vertical, horizontal and oblique thin- and block-sectioning using a ‘Lakeside 70’ cement mount; (b) by immersion in various clearing fluids (usually clove oil); (c) by solution with a weak hydrochloric acid and ‘Cellofas’ ‘mush’, the specimen first being mounted in ‘Lakeside’; and (d) by ‘heat splitting’ to produce half- sections of the Nummulitidae. Most of the species have been illustrated using a Cambridge Mk II ‘Stereoscan’ scanning elec- tron microscope, the micrographs having been taken mainly by one of the authors (J. E. W.). The specimens to be photographed were first cleaned with a 25% solution of the enzyme cleaning agent ‘Decon’ and placed on aluminium stubs. A variety of stub mounting techniques were used. In some cases a glass cover-slip was cemented on to the stub using silver ‘dag’ and the foraminifera were then mounted on the glass using ‘Cellofas’; in other cases the specimens were directly mounted on the stub using ‘Kodaflat’ adhesive. A third technique, of mounting on a piece of negative film which had previously been cemented to the stub with ‘Durafix’, also proved satis- factory; the gelatine of the film when wetted provides enough adhesive to anchor the smaller FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 5 foraminifera sufficiently. The specimens were then coated with several layers of gold before scanning and photography. Part of Pl. 8, the whole of Pl. 9 and the thin sections of Pl. 10 were photographed with a Watson ‘Holophot’ Photomicroscope by the Museum’s photographic unit. The text-figures were mainly drawn by one of us (R. L. H.) with the aid of a light microscope and camera lucida attachment. The measurements of Operculina/Nummulites were taken from tracings of the embryonic apparatus on the Projectina (Model 4014) microscope. Biostratigraphy Stratigraphy of the Dent Group The Dent Group of the eastern Dent Peninsula, Sabah, comprises, in ascending order, the Sebahat, Ganduman and Togopi Formations. A thick (c. 14000 ft or 4300 m) mainly marine sequence of predominantly clastic sediments with subordinate limestones, it locally overlies the Miocene Segama Group unconformably. The Togopi Formation is itself overlain with slight unconformity by about 100 ft (30 m) of Quaternary terrace and Recent river alluvium (Figs 1, 2). The main structural feature is a broad anticlinal uplift trending ENE down the centre of the peninsula, off which the three formations dip gently in a more or less conformable sequence. Sebahat Formation. This is estimated by Haile & Wong (1965 : 74) to be over 7500 ft (2290 m) thick and was laid down in the sublittoral and neritic zones of the Neogene sea. They also state (1965 :75) that it contains abundant foraminifera which have been identified by SSPC micro- palaeontologists; these include rich planktonic faunas, larger foraminifera and small benthics, none of which has ever been described or illustrated. This Formation was dated as ‘late Tf (late Miocene) to early Tg (early Pliocene)’ by Haile & Wong. Globigerinoides obliquus Bolli is said to characterize the greater part of the unit. This, according to Postuma (1971), ranges up to Zone N18 (Upper Miocene/Pliocene boundary), but Blow (1969) would extend the range as far as Zone N22 (Pleistocene). In the lower part of the Formation several good age indicators are however present: Globorotalia mayeri Cushman & Ellisor, Globigerinoides subquadratus Brén- nimann, Globorotalia praemenardii Cushman & Stainforth and G. fohsi forma robusta Bolli. Their joint occurrence suggests an age not older than Zone N12 or younger than the early part of Zone N13 (M. Miocene). The Tabin Limestone Member (middle Sebahat Formation) is said by Haile & Wong to contain Cycloclypeus (Katacycloclypeus), a larger foraminifer believed to be restricted to Lower Tf (M. Miocene) (fide Adams 1970). This identification has recently been confirmed by Dr Adams (personal communication), who has examined four samples of limestone from a 30 ft (9 m) bed west of the Tabin River. Apart from C. (K.) annulatus Martin, other age- diagnostic forms such as Orbulina sp. (Tf/N9-Recent) and Lepidocyclina (Nephrolepidina) sp. (Td-Upper Tf) are present. Thus the Sebahat Formation is probably Middle to Upper Miocene (Lower—Upper Tf of Adams 1970) in age. Ganduman Formation. This is poorly fossiliferous. It is some 5000 ft (1500 m) thick, and an abun- dance of lignite and plant remains suggests a period of shallowing and very rapid deposition close to a large river mouth with extensive coastal swamps and mangroves, very similar in fact to the coastal environment of the Dent Peninsula today. A few specimens of Globigerinoides obliquus Bolli have been found in the lower part of the formation, but they could have been reworked from the Sebahat Formation. The Ganduman is probably late Miocene or early Pliocene in age. Togopi Formation. This marks a return to shallow marine sedimentation (inner shelf to littoral). It is the youngest unit of the Dent Group and crops out in a curved belt, 2-3 miles (about 4 km) wide, extending from Tambisan Island in the north to the Merah River in the south (Fig. 1). The type locality and section is in the upper reaches of the Togopi River; few exposures are known elsewhere. Dips are low, usually under 10°, towards the north-east, east and south-east around the nose of the Sebahat anticline. In the river section the boundary with the underlying Ganduman Formation is said to be a rather sharp lithological change from grey sand with pebbly beds up to 1 in (25 mm) thick, 6 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON [J Alluvium Togopi Fmn. Location nh DENT GROUPE=} Ganduman Fmn TAMBISAN ISLAND Study Area Sebahat Fmn. KOTA KINABALU Fig. 1 The stratigraphy of the eastern part of the Dent Peninsula, Sabah (after Haile & Wong 1965). FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION ‘(S961 [[e3NN Joie) sojdures Jo uoneso] oy} SUIMOYS ‘yeqes “efnsurusg jueq Uslo}see ‘uUON9Eg JoATY Idosoy, Joddn sy} Jo dep, Z ‘sy uoljewJo4 uewnpued Fj t NTA 0 JTL 7 i NOLWWHOS IdOD01 [_] (WUNIAN||\7) Pues ede9] [=] 6h'6 SN : i cr 3 | “VINSNINAd LNAd 40 LYVd ISOWNY3ISV4 4O dVW S fia 8 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON cemented with limonite and full of plant and wood fragments, to the characteristic olive-grey and bluish-grey poorly-bedded clays of the lower Togopi (Haile sample NB 9456/7) in which plant remains are rare according to Haile & Wong (1965: 82). No unconformity has been reported. Samples NB 9450 up to and including NB 9456/7 were collected from grey to blue-grey sandy clays cropping out in the river banks (Fig. 2). In the area from which NB 9453 was collected there are irregular concretionary beds of fossiliferous grey calcareous sandstone. At an 8 ft (2:4 m) exposure from which NB 9449 was taken the lithology had changed slightly to a blue-grey plastic clay and at NB 9448 a brownish limestone with some 9 in (230 mm) nodules of harder ferru- ginous limestone was exposed for a thickness of 10 ft (3 m), the whole being covered by a tufa crust. The topmost samples are blue calcareous clays set amongst rubbly limestone rich in corals and reefal debris, the sequence thereafter disappearing under Quaternary alluvium. Assuming an average dip of 5°-10° towards the east and south-east, the type-section must approach 700 ft (210 m) in thickness. The formation is said to attain a maximum thickness of c. 1350 ft (410 m) in the south of the area (Haile & Wong 1965: 81). Elsewhere, the only other sections studied were by Clements (of SSPC), the results being summarized by Haile & Wong (1965). He had two rentis lines (jungle trails) cut to the north and south of the Togopi River. Along the northern line, the basal beds were reported to be almost undistinguishable from the Ganduman Formation but photogeological evidence suggested an angular unconformity. In the southern cut Clements found a basal conglomeratic sandstone suggesting that the lower boundary of the Togopi represents a shallow marine transgression and is probably slightly unconformable. Distribution and palaeoecology of the Togopi Foraminifera Eleven of the best samples collected by Dr N. S. Haile from the Togopi River section were selected for study. A description of these samples, in ascending order of the succession, and their foramini- feral faunas, together with a palaeoecological interpretation, are outlined below. A distribution chart is provided (Table 1, pp. 12-13). The basal samples, NB 9456 and NB 9457, became mixed in transit and have, therefore, been treated together. Six species were found, of which only Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann) and Cellanthus biperforatus sp. nov. are common. Sample NB 9455 (see Fig. 2) contains only two species, P. catilliformis being dominant. The foraminifera for the most part are badly abraded and corroded, and support Nuttall’s (1965) conclusion that the lowermost Togopi was laid down in very shallow, muddy, turbulent, and possibly brackish water close to shore. Alternatively, the microfauna could have been washed in from the sublittoral zone. Sample NB 9454 contains the first really large fauna. Some 25 species are present, all indicative of shallow inner-shelf conditions. Ten species of the Miliolidae occur (see Table 1), though none of them are common, together with five species of the Elphidiidae, the first species of Lagena and Operculina ammonoides (Schréter). By far the largest elements in this fauna, however, are the larger rotaliids, Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann) still remaining dominant. NB 9453 is a hard calcareous sandstone which has been disaggregated and also examined by means of thin sections. Although only 10 species have been identified with certainty it appears to contain a similar fauna to NB 9454. Samples NB 9460 and NB 9452 were from approximately the same horizon although the latter (see Fig. 2) was collected some distance to the west of NB 9460; their faunas, however, are quite different. NB 9460 yielded 27 species, dominated almost entirely by large members of the Rotaliidae (common Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny) and Pseudoro- talia spp.) and members of the Elphidiidae; only one miliolid was found (Quinqueloculina curta Cushman), but the first planktonic foraminifera occur (see Table 1). Fifty-seven species have been recorded from NB 9452. Here the fauna is characterized by inner-shelf larger foraminifera which today live on stable substrates, often associated with sea-grass and marine algae down to a depth of about 30 m (usually, however, about 10m). Our four main species of the Nummulitidae (Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole), N. tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole), Operculina ammonoides (Schréter) and O. bartschi Cushman) make up the bulk of the fauna together with very large numbers of Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny) and a few representatives of Amphistegina and Hetero- FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 9 stegina (see Table 1). The largest diversity of the Elphidiidae (nine species) also occurs in this sample; there are also abundant specimens of Florilus asanoi nom. nov. Samples NB 9450 and NB 9449 probably represent sediments from the deepest, most open water locally present in “Togopi times’, though it is doubtful if a depth of 30 m was ever exceeded (Nuttall 1965 : 163). Here the foraminiferal fauna attains its greatest diversity, 78 and 86 species respectively. The agglutinating element, never strong, reaches its acme, and the Bolivinitidae, usually signifying deeper-water conditions, make their only significant appearance. In NB 9449, moreover (see Table 1), the 11 species of Lagena found in the Togopi Formation occur together in large numbers, while both the Miliolidae and Rotaliidae attain their largest diversity, 24 and 28 species, respectively. The algal-dwelling Calcarina hispida Brady is a significant member of the fauna in NB 9450, while at NB 9449 many attached species such as Cymbaloporetta spp. may indicate the presence of seaweed, associated with patch reefs. NB 9448 is a badly leached sample containing few recognizable species. The uppermost samples present in the Togopi River section may signify a return to shallower water with a build-up of coral reef-patches. A significant proportion of these samples is made up of broken coral (probably transported) and it may be doubted whether true coral reefs occurred in this area at the time. Nevertheless, the lack of planktonic foraminifera compared with Recent shallow-water samples taken in Darvel Bay (H. Buckley, BM(NH), personal communication) is puzzling unless one postulates either a barrier (? coral-reef) to the open sea and thus reduced circulation, or a much higher sedimentation rate than at present. Samples NB 9447 and NB 9446 have 40 and 11 species respectively. Their preservation and often delicate nature suggests that they are life assemblages (cf. the broken corals). Significantly, the large species of Pseudorotalia, Ammonia annectens (Parker & Jones), Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang, and the previously almost ubiquitous Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny) are absent and have been replaced by smaller rotaliids such as Ammonia beccarii (Linnaeus) var. tepida (Cushman), A. takanabensis (Ishizaki) and Pararotalia cf. nipponica (Asano) (see Table 1). The Elphidiidae remain common to the end of the section, in particular Elphidiella indopacifica Germeraad. Age of the Togopi Formation Planktonic foraminifera. Only very few, usually immature, individuals, belonging to six species, were found in samples NB 9460 to NB 9447. These are: Species Range (after Blow 1969) Hastigerina siphonifera (d’Orbigny) N12-N23 Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny N16-N23 Globigerina quinqueloba Natland N17-N23 (after Parker 1967) Globigerinoides ruber (d’Orbigny) N16-N23 Globiginoides sacculifer (Brady) N6-N23 Globigerinita glutinata (Egger) N16-N23 The upper part of the Togopi Formation cannot, therefore, be older than late Miocene (Zones N16/17). Benthic foraminifera. Our taxonomic study of the Togopi foraminifera has enabled us to search the literature and establish a tentative stratigraphical distribution for 119 benthic species. There are, of course, a number of difficulties in determining overall ranges, not least of which is the impossibility of verifying original age determinations where accepted age-diagnostic species are absent. Fig. 3 shows the distribution of the 15 species, thought to be extinct, which occur in the Togopi Formation. Some may ultimately prove to be of importance stratigraphically and are discussed below in conjunction with the work of Billman & Kartaadipura (1975). Nummulites tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole), characterized by its trabeculae-like structures, is very distinctive, but its only previous record is from the Miocene of Trinidad. Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole) resembles a number of Plio-Pleistocene species from Bikini Atoll (Cole 1954). Amphistegina cf. wanneriana 1 But see Postscript, p. 106. 10 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Fischer, to which our poorly-preserved specimens are tentatively assigned, has been previously reported only from the Pliocene of Ceram and Soemba, Indonesia. However, Brizalina amyg- dalaeformis (Brady) iokiensis (Asano), Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang and Cellanthus adelaidensis (Howchin & Parr) occur in the Togopi with some frequency, have all been recorded more often by previous workers, and do not appear to have been found in post-Pliocene sediments. None are found in the uppermost samples (Fig. 3), thus suggesting that these beds may be of Lower Pleistocene age. Nevertheless, two important species, both ranging from Miocene to Plio-Pleisto- cene, namely Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann) and Cribrononion tikutoensis (Nakamura), are also absent from the upper Togopi. The distribution of all five species may, therefore, be facies-controlled. Finally, five new species are listed in Fig. 3. NB NB NB NB NB NB NB 9456/7] 9455 | 9454] 9453 | 9460 | 9452 | 9450 ayaa 9448 ove o4aG a o_o | Nummulites ea 9 <3) & 9 3 & eo rr = oy S) Ps > Z = ee Ss a 22 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1968 Quinqueloculina contorta d Orbigny; Chiji & Lopez: 110; pl. 8, figs 9a—c. 1970 Quinqueloculina contorta d’Orbigny; Matoba : 59; pl. 2, figs 6a, b. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9452, ? 9453 (rock section), 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:56-0:90 mm, width 0:31-0:50 mm, thickness 0-21-0-37 mm. REMARKS. Le Roy (1964: F20; pl. 3, figs 7, 8) records Q. contorta from the Neogene of Okinawa, west Pacific. Because of its well-pronounced striate ornamentation, however, we hesitate to include Lé Roy’s species within the present synonymy. In apertural view, the Togopi specimens have either rounded or truncate chamber peripheries (Figs 13, 14). The truncate form is very similar in appearance to that from the Recent of north- east Japan figured by Matoba (1970: pl. 2, figs 6a, b) and closely resembles d’Orbigny’s type-figure (1846: pl. 20, figs 4-6). Figs 13,14 Quinqueloculina contorta d’Orbigny. Contrasting apertural views. 13, P50070. Specimen illustrated in Pl. 1, fig. 10. 14, P50239. Sample NB 9452. x 50. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Originally described from the Tertiary of Nussdorf in the Vienna Basin (d’Orbigny 1846) it has subsequently been recorded from the Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951, Matsunaga 1963). Recent: Coasts of Japan (Asano 1956a, Chiji & Lopez 1968, Matoba 1970); Diu, north-west India (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964a). Quinqueloculina curta Cushman Figs 15a-17b; Pl. 2, figs 10, 11 1898a Miliolina cuvieriana (d’Orbigny); Millett : 505; pl. 12, figs 2a, b (non Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny 1839). 1917 Quinqueloculina disparalis d’Orbigny var. curta Cushman : 49; pl. 14, figs 2a—c; text-fig. 30. 1921 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Cushman : 426; pl. 100, figs 1, 2. 1924 Quinqueloculina disparalis d’Orbigny var. curta Cushman; Cushman : 60; pl. 22, figs 7, 8. 1931 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Hada : 80, text-figs 33a—c. 1933 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Hofker : 98; pl. 3, figs 13-25; text-figs 19, 20. 1937 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Yabe & Asano: 114; pl. 17, figs 1-4. 1941a Quinqueloculina sp. F Le Roy: 71; pl. 5, figs 3, 4. 19416 Cribrolinoides curta (Cushman) Le Roy: 113; pl. 1, figs 1-5. 1951 Cribrolinoides curta (Cushman); Asano: 9, text-figs 63, 64. 1956a Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Asano: 59; pl. 7, figs 13a, b. 1959 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Graham & Militante : 44; pl. 5, figs 9a—c. 1963 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman; Matsunaga: pl. 26, figs 16a—c. MATERIAL. About 500 specimens. NB 9449, ? 9450, 9452, ? 9453, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:16-2:15 mm, width 0:55-1:62 mm, thickness 0-41—1-50 mm. REMARKS. Many of the forms illustrated by Hofker (1933: pl. 3, figs 13-25) are present in the Togopi material. There is gradation in the larger specimens from smooth tests with rounded chambers, carinae being only poorly developed on the chamber peripheries (Figs 17a, b; Pl. 2, FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 23 fig. 11), to forms with truncate, strongly carinate peripheries and even secondary reticulate ornament (Figs 15a, b; Pl. 2, fig. 10). Smaller individuals (Figs 16a—c) tend to be very similar to that figured by Graham & Militante (1959). Cushman & Le Roy (1939) erected a new genus Cribrolinoides, with Quinqueloculina curta as the type-species, differentiated mainly by the development of a complicated ring-like cribrate aperture. Hofker (1968 : 18) has shown that this trend occurs only in some gerontic microspheric forms, the megalospheric forms having simple apertures. The present material, with the exception of one ‘cribrolinoid’ specimen, has relatively simple apertures with single or bifid teeth. Figs 15a-17b Quinqueloculina curta Cushman. Overall variation. 15a, b, P50084. Apertural and tear views of specimen illustrated on Pl. 2, fig. 10. 16a—c, P50240. Apertural, rear and front views of small specimen with prominent carinae. 17a, b, P50085. Apertural and rear views of specimen illustrated on Pl. 2, fig. 11. All from sample NB 9449. x 15. DistRIBUTION. Fossil: Late Tertiary (? Pliocene) of Siberoet Island, Indonesia (Le Roy 1941a); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951, Matsunaga 1963); Pliocene (Yabe & Asano 1937) and Plio- Pleistocene (Le Roy 19416) of Java. Recent: This species occurs widely at the present day in the west Pacific Islands from Japan to New Guinea. Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny Figs 19a-c; Pl. 1, fig. 14; Pl. 2, figs 12, 13 1839 Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny : 190; pl. 11, figs 19-21. 1884 Méiliolina cuvieriana (d’Orbigny) Brady : 162; pl. 5, figs 12a—c. 21884 Miliolina auberiana (d’Orbigny); Brady : 162; pl. 5, figs 8, 9. 21917 Quinqueloculina auberiana d’Orbigny; Cushman : 46; pl. 12, figs la—c. 1921 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Cushman : 418; pl. 87, figs 2a—3c; text-figs 22, 23 (non d@Orbigny 1839). 1931 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Hada : 79, text-figs 32a—c. 1932 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Cushman : 24; pl. 6, figs 2a—c. 1941a Quinqueloculina aff. lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Le Roy: 71; pl. 5, figs 5, 6. 19416 Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny; Le Roy: 112; pl. 1, figs 31-33. 1951 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Asano : 5, text-figs 29-31. 1956 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Bhatia: 17; pl. 2, figs 10a, b. 1956 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Marks : 12, 34; pl. 9, figs 19a-c. 1956a Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Asano: 60; pl. 7, figs 17a—c; pl. 8, figs 14a-c, 17a-c; pl. 9, figs 17a, b. 1960 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Barker (pars): 10; pl. 5, figs 12a—c only (after Brady). 21960 Quinqueloculina auberiana d’Orbigny; Barker : 10; pl. 5, figs 8, 9 (after Brady). 1960 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Chang: pl. 7, figs 5a—7b. 24 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1961 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny ; Braga : 56; pl. 5, fig. 3. 2.1964 Quinqueloculina carinata d’Orbigny; Le Roy : F19; pl. 12, figs 19, 20. 1969 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny; Resig : 77; pl. 2, fig. 14. 1970 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d@’Orbigny; Kim, Kim & Kim: 154; pl. ix-1, figs 7a-c. MATERIAL. 110 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. 18 ) a | b @ ; d Figs 18a-d Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny. ZF 3813. Front, apertural, rear and edge views. Note characteristic apertural neck protruding above the outline of the penultimate chamber and rounded aperture with short simple tooth. Recent, Pedro Bank, south-west of Jamaica. x 60. VARIATION. Length 0:25-1:55 mm, breadth 0-17-1-35 mm, thickness 0-13-0-90 mm. REMARKS. There is much confusion in the literature concerning d’Orbigny’s three smooth carinate species, Q. lamarckiana, Q. cuvieriana and Q. auberiana, all of which were originally described from Cuba and adjacent waters. | ) | i Figs 19a—c Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny. P50074. Front, apertural (see also PI. 1, fig. 14) and rear views. Sample NB 9450. x35. We have been able to examine specimens of Q. /Jamarckiana and Q. cuvieriana from the Pedro Bank, south-west of Jamaica, and an example of the former species from this locality, of similar size to that figured by d’Orbigny, is shown in Figs 18a—d. It has the characteristic apertural neck protruding above the outline of the penultimate chamber and a rounded aperture with a short simple tooth. Large specimens from the same sample have an even more produced neck as drawn by Le Calvez & Le Calvez (1958: pl. 9, fig. 105). In specimens of Q. cuvieriana, on the other hand, the aperture is nearly flush and the tooth relatively larger, projecting above the outline of the aperture in larger specimens, when seen in lateral view. Fine striations are often developed in this form (P. Marshall, personal communication), but they can also occur in Q. lamarckiana, so this factor may be a variable characteristic in the group as a whole. Q. auberiana appears to be a rare species in the Caribbean and is not found in the Pedro Bank samples; it has an aperture like that in Q. cuvieriana differing according to d’Orbigny (1839 : 193) in‘. . . les ondulations transversales dont elle est ornée’. We have yet to see an illustrated specimen showing this character and are thus uncertain whether Q. cuvieriana and Q. auberiana are conspecific or not. If they are, the former name has page-priority. D’Orbigny’s type-figures (1839: pl. 11, figs 19-21 and pl. 12, figs 1-3) are certainly very similar. The situation was further complicated when Le Calvez & Le Calvez (1958 : 187) introduced Q. viennensis for Brady’s Q. cuvieriana from Japan. They stated that they had examined d’Orbigny’s ) FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 25 type-specimen in Paris and found that the two were very different; this is borne out by their photo- graph of the type (1958: pl. 8, fig. 90). This refigured specimen of Q. cuvieriana is, however, most unlike that shown by d’Orbigny in 1839, thus to prevent any confusion we are basing our identi- fication on the original figure. On this evidence we conclude that Q. Jamarckiana is quite distinct from Q. cuvierinana and that our specimens, Brady’s and all those listed in the synonymy should be referred to Q. cuvieriana. It is worth noting that this species has almost always been reported as Q. lamarckiana although in no case is the produced aperture visible. Most larger specimens of Q. cuvieriana in the Togopi samples have strongly carinate peri- pheries, but a few are rounded or truncate. Fine longitudinal striations occur on some individuals though the majority of tests are smooth. In large specimens (Figs 19a—c; Pl. 1, fig. 14) the aperture is elongate, though always flush, and the tooth long, straight or Y or T shaped and raised above the rim. In small specimens (PI. 2, figs 12, 13) the aperture becomes sub-rounded. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Upper Miocene of Taiwan (Chang 1960); Miocene and Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951); Pliocene of Okinawa (? Le Roy 1964); Late Tertiary (? Pliocene) of Siberoet Island, Indonesia and the Ewa Borehole, Hawaii (Le Roy 1941a and Resig 1969, respectively); Plio-Pleistocene (Le Roy 19415) and Pleistocene (Marks 1956) of Java. Recent: Widespread in the West Pacific with reliable records also from India and East Africa. Quinqueloculina exsculpta (Heron-Allen & Earland) Pl. 1, figs 11, 12 1898 Miliolina bosciana (d’Orbigny); Millett : 267; pl. 6, figs 1a, b (non Q. bosciana d’Orbigny 1839). 1898 Miliolina bosciana (d’Orbigny) costate var., Millett : 268; pl. 6, fig. 3. 1915 Miliolina exsculpta Heron-Allen & Earland : 567; pl. 42, figs 23-26. 1923 Adelosina milletti Wiesner : 76. 1959 Quinqueloculina bosciana d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante: 43; pl. 5, figs 3a, b (non d’Orbigny 1839), = smooth forms. 1959 Quinqueloculina poeyana d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante: 46; pl. 5, figs 16a-c (non d’Orbigny 1839), = costate forms. 1968 Quinqueloculina bosciana d’Orbigny; Chiji & Lopez: 109; pl. 8, figs 6a, b. MATERIAL. 53 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Smooth forms Costate forms Length 0-23-0-35 mm 0:26-0:50 mm Width 0-12-0:16 mm 0:13-0:23 mm Thickness 0-10-0-15 mm 0-11-0-19 mm REMARKS. Wiesner (1923) erected Adelosina milletti for Millett’s specimens of M. bosciana (d’Orbigny) from the Malay Archipelago. However, study of the original material and Heron- Allen & Earland’s collections show that this taxon is itself a junior synonym of Quinqueloculina exsculpta (Heron-Allen & Earland), a costate species into which Millett’s smooth forms at station 19 intergrade. Millett himself recognized a costate variety of M. bosciana at this locality and drew attention to the diversity of surface ornamentation in this species. Smooth and costate forms of Q. exsculpta occur in the present material (NB 9449) and are figured here. They also occur in the Philippines where Graham & Militante (1959) have reported the smooth forms as Q. bosciana and the costate forms as Q. poeyana. Although the figured syntypes of Q. exsculpta are unfortunately damaged, additional material from the Kerimba Archipelago and Vavau Anchorage (Tonga) in the Heron-Allen & Earland type slide collections (192, square 40; 203, square 83; 196, square 17) testifies to the fact that gradation between the smooth and ornamented forms occurs. In view of this it is surprising that Heron-Allen & Earland (1915) did not include Millett’s record of M. bosciana in the synonymy of their new species. 26 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON DISTRIBUTION. Recorded from the Recent of the Kerimba Archipelago, East Africa, the Malay Archipelago, the Philippines, central Japan and Tonga. The Togopi material is believed to con- stitute the first definite fossil record. Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady) Figs 20-21; Pl. 2, figs 1, 2 1858 ‘Quinqueloculina with oblique ridges’ Parker : pl. 5, fig. 10 (figures). 1881 Miliolina parkeri Brady : 46 (description). 1884 Miliolina parkeri Brady; Brady : 177; pl. 7, figs 14a-c. 1915 Miliolina parkeri Brady; Heron-Allen & Earland : 574; pl. 43, figs 11, 12. 1917 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady) Cushman : 50; pl. 15, figs 3a—-c. 1921 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Cushman : 440; pl. 86, figs 4a-c. 1924 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady): Cushman : 59; pl. 22, fig. 3. 1932 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Cushman : 25; pl. 6, figs 3, 4. 1954 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Cushman, Todd & Post : 333; pl. 83, fig. 23 only. 1957 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Todd : 286 (table); pl. 85, figs 13a—14b. 1958 Massilina corrugata Collins : 362; pl. 2, figs 11la—12c. 1960 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Barker : 14; pl. 7, figs 14a—-c (after Brady). 1961 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Huang: 85; pl. 1, fig. 24. 1963 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Matsunaga : pl. 28, figs 7a—c. 1964 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Rocha & Ubaldo: 37; pl. 2, figs 3, 4. 1965 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Moura: 17; pl. 1, fig. 13. 1968 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady); Chiji & Lopez: 110; pl. 9, figs 4a, b. Figs 20, 21 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady). Contrasting apertural views; compare with further type in Pl. 2, fig. 1. 20, P50241, sample NB 9452. 21, P50242, sample NB 9450. x 30. MATERIAL. 29 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:30-1:20 mm, width 0-29-1-00 mm, thickness 0-20-0-57 mm. RemARKS. In the Togopi material, the chamber peripheries of Quinqueloculina parkeri, when seen in apertural view, are not only acutely angled (PI. 2, fig. 1) as in Brady’s figured specimen of 1884, but also truncate (Fig. 21) or even rounded (Fig. 20). The ornament is generally well developed on the earlier visible chambers but is often sparse or absent over the last chamber, particularly in the apertural region. Brady’s specimens from Honolulu and those of Parker from the Indian Ocean have been examined and show limited variation both in ornamentation and the shape of the chambers when seen aperturally; the chamber peripheries, however, are never as strongly truncated as many in the Togopi samples. Specimens identified by Millett (1898a) as Q. parkeri from the Malay Archipelago, on the other hand, are extremely variable, some of the smaller specimens resembling those of Brady while others (e.g. Millett 1898a: pl. 12, figs 4a, b) have crispate ornamentation in place of the regular ridges and furrows and are closer to Miliolina kerimbatica Heron-Allen & Earland with which his material has been synonymized (Heron- Allen & Earland 1915: 514). Collins (1958), in erecting this new species Massilina corrugata, differentiated it from Q. parkeri on account of its blunter periphery and because ‘the characters of fully developed megalo- spheric specimens are those of Massilina’ (1958 : 362). Both his holotype (pl. 2, fig. 11) and para- type (pl. 2, fig. 12) in the BM(NH), however, appear to be quinqueloculine and strongly resemble much of the Togopi material. Clearly a close investigation is needed into variation shown by Brady’s species, both fossil and Recent, in the Indo-Pacific. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 27 DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of northern Japan (Matsunaga 1963); sub-Recent alluvia of the coastal plain of northern Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: Originally described by Brady (1881) from Parker’s specimens from the ‘East Indian Seas’, the species has subsequently been widely recorded in the western Pacific from central Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968) to north-east Australia (Collins 1958). Other records include the Seychelles (Brady 1884), Inhaca Islands (Moura 1965) and the Kerimba Archipelago (Heron-Allen & Earland 1915), all off East Africa. Quinqueloculina philippinensis Cushman Pl. 2, figs 3-6 1917 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Cushman (pars) : 55; pl. 16, fig. 1 only. 1921 Quinqueloculina kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland) var. philippinensis Cushman : 438; pl. 89, figs 2, 3. 1936 Quinqueloculina kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland); Keijzer : 113, text-figs 15a-f (non Miliolina kerimbatica Heron-Allen & Earland 1915). 1936 Quinqueloculina thalmanni Vroman (in Boomgaart & Vroman) : 422, text-figs 1-5. 1937 Quinqueloculina reticulata chitanii Yabe & Asano : 114; pl. 17, figs. 8a—c. 19415 Quinqueloculina kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland) var. philippinensis Cushman; Le Roy : 112; pl. 1, figs 20-22. 1959 Triloculina kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland) var. philippinensis (Cushman); Graham & Militante (pars) : 55; pl. 8, figs 1-3c only. 1968 Quinqueloculina (Miliola) kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland); Hofker (pars): 18; pl. 3, figs 12-15 only. 1974 Quinqueloculina philippinensis Cushman; Ponder (pars) : 244; pl. 13, figs 22, 23 only. MATERIAL. 90 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:48-1:70 mm, width 0:48-1:16 mm, thickness 0:28-0:85 mm. REMARKS. At Togopi both generations of this species are highly variable, however a basic growth pattern is common to all; the early chambers are very prominent and the well-developed apertural neck is very characteristic. Ornamentation is a relatively coarse reticulum and there is some degree of ribbing. Some highly reticulate specimens (PI. 2, figs 5, 6) resemble Q. reticulata chitanii Yabe & Asano; other specimens resemble Q. thalmanni Vroman. Both we consider synonyms. Keijzer (1936) and Hofker (1968) regarded Cushman’s varieties philippinensis and reticulostriata superfluous, and used only Q. kerimbatica (Heron-Allen & Earland). Furthermore, Hofker stated that specimens resembling var. reticulostriata were all megalospheric, whereas those like var. philippinensis were microspheric. We have examined the syntypes of var. philippinensis and var. reticulostriata from the Philip- pines and have compared them with the types of Miliolina kerimbatica from East Africa. Q. kerimbatica var. reticulostriata (USNM no. 13488, from Albatross station D 5276) has a pro- nounced ridged neck, a quinqueloculine test, and ornamentation which is made up of sharp costae with large alveoli set obliquely on the final two chambers. Q. kerimbatica var. philippinensis (USNM no. 13510 from Albatross station D 5159) comprises adult forms slightly smaller than those of the preceding variety, with a similarly pronounced apertural neck and test ornament of a mainly reticulate pattern developed to a greater or lesser degree as in the Togopi material. Syntypes and topotypes of M. kerimbatica in the collections of the BM(NH) show a range of ornament (characteristically contorted ridges and grooves) which agrees well with Heron-Allen & Earland’s figures (1915: pl. 43, figs 13-23). The apertural neck is usually not prominent and the aperture is distinctly elongate. The test, which appears triloculine externally, is quinqueloculine in thin section. We are of the opinion that both Cushman’s varieties should be separated from Heron-Allen & Earland’s species (which seems to be more closely related to Q. parkeri (Brady)) and moreover are distinct enough to warrant separate specific status. However, juveniles have little ornament and are difficult to separate. An immature form from Togopi with neither the reticulation of Q. philippinensis, nor the curved alveoli of Q. reticulostriata, is illustrated here (Pl. 2, fig. 4). 28 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Although Ponder (1974 and personal communication) in his review of the Q. philippinensis problem comes to similar conclusions to ourselves, we are still not convinced that Q. pseudo- reticulata Parr is synonymous with Q. philippinensis since in the Togopi samples we cannot see gradation between the two. His pl. 13 shows many morphological types which we do not have. It may be that he has grouped together a number of different reticulate species of Quinqueloculina, or that this species is even more variable than the Togopi material suggests. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene (Yabe & Asano 1937), Plio-Pleistocene (Le Roy 19415) and ‘Qua- ternary’ (Vroman 1936) of Java. Recent: Found in the western Pacific from the Philippines to north-east Australia. Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny Pl. 2, fig. 8 1839 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny : 198; pl. 12, figs 21-23. 1932 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny; Cushman (pars) : 25; pl. 6, figs 6a—c only. 1951 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny; Asano: 5, text-figs 32-34. 1959 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante : 46; pl. 6, figs la-c. 1961 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny; Huang: 85; pl. 2, figs 17, 18. 1965 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny; Rocha : 417; pl. 4, figs 4, 5. MATERIAL. 62 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:35-0:90 mm, width 0-19-0-36 mm, thickness 0-15-0-43 mm. REMARKS. Both Parr (1945) and Collins (1958) note that the cool-water species, Quinqueloculina subpolygona, first recorded from Victoria, Australia (Parr 1945: 196; pl. 12, figs 2a—c) and subsequently from New South Wales (Albani 1968: 99; pl. 7, figs 12-14), is distinct from Q. polygona d’Orbigny. The former appears to have a shorter, more strongly carinate and less regularly built test. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951). Recent: Although originally described from Cuba and Jamaica (d’Orbigny 1839) its occurrence in the Indo-Pacific is well substantiated by many workers. Records include Fiji (Cushman 1932), the Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959), western Taiwan (Huang 1961) and the Mozambique coast (Rocha 1965). Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr TL An ites, 1884 Méiliolina reticulata (d’Orbigny) ; Brady : 177; pl. 9, figs 2a, b, 3 (non Triloculina reticulata d’Orbigny, 1826). Plate 2 Scanning Electron Micrographs Figs 1, 2 Quinqueloculina parkeri (Brady). P50075, P50076. Apertural and side views. Samples NB 9447 and NB 9450 respectively. x 60. (Compare Figs 20-21, p. 26.) Figs 3-6 Quinqueloculina philippinensis Cushman. Fig. 3, P50077. Side view of ‘typical specimen’. Sample NB 9449. Fig. 4, P50078. Side view of ? juvenile specimen. Sample NB 9449. Figs 5, 6, P50079, P50080. Side and apertural views of highly reticulate specimens like Q. reticulata chitanii Yabe & Asano. Sample NB 9450. All x 35. Fig. 7 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny. P50081. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 35. Fig. 8 Quinqueloculina polygona d’Orbigny. P50082. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 75. Fig. 9 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr. P50083. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 35. Figs 10,11 Quinqueloculina curta Cushman. P50084, P50085. Side views of specimens with secondary reticulation and poorly-developed carinae respectively. Sample NB 9449. x 25. (See Figs 15, 17, p. 23.) Figs 12, 13 Quinqueloculina cuvieriana d’Orbigny. P50086, P50087. Side and apertural views of small carinate specimens. Sample NB 9449. x 75. Fig. 14 Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman). P50088. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 60. Figs 15, 16 Pseudomassilina medioelata sp. nov. Fig. 15, P50090. Side view of immature specimen. Paratype, sample NB 9452. Fig. 16, P50089. Side view of adult specimen. Holotype, sample NB 9452. Both x60. (See Fig. 24. p. 32.) i ee FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 30 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1941 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 22; pl. 3, figs 1-3. 1941a Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy: 71; pl. 5, figs 1, 2. 1941a Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny) var. elongata Le Roy: 71; pl. 5, figs 13, 14. 1941 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr : 305. 1951 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Asano: 6, text-figs 35, 36. 1958 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Ganapati & Satyavati: pl. 2, fig. 32. 1960 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Barker : 18; pl. 9, figs. 2a, b, 3 (after Brady). 1964 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : F19; pl. 12, figs 21, 22. 1964 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Rocha & Ubaldo: 38; pl. 2, fig. 7. 1964a Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Rocha & Ubaldo: 412; pl. 1, figs 4a, b. 19646 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Rocha & Ubaldo: 647 (list); pl. 2, figs 3, 4. 1965 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Moura: 18; pl. 1, fig. 14. 1967 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Lloyd: 88; pl. 13, figs Sa—c. 1968 Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata Parr; Albani : 98; pl. 7, figs 18-20. 1968 Quinqueloculina reticulata (d’Orbigny); Chiji & Lopez: 110; pl. 9, figs Sa—c. 1974 Quinqueloculina philippinensis Cushman; Ponder (pars) : 244; pl. 13, figs 9, 10, 14, 15, 21, 24 only. MATERIAL. 37 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9453, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:60-1:43 mm, width 0:35-1:16 mm, thickness 0:25-0:80 mm. REMARKS. Normally, in the Togopi material, 3 chambers are seen on one side of the test, 4 on the other. Sometimes, however, the ratio is 3: 3 and occasionally as many as 5 or 6 chambers have been counted on one side. The reticulate ornament is confined predominantly to the peripheral surface of each chamber, as reported by Brady (1884) and Albani (1968), the central part of each face being smooth. In larger specimens the chamber edges are broadly rounded, while in smaller specimens they are more acute. Examination of the holotype of Q. pseudoreticulata and over 70 syntypes from ‘Challenger’ station 188, south of New Guinea, confirms that the holotype is fully exemplary of the species. Furthermore, no specimen has the test shape, produced apertural neck and coarser ornamentation of Q. philippinensis (Cushman). This is in conflict with the findings of Ponder (1974), who states he has evidence of a gradational series. The differences between these two species as seen in the Togopi Formation are illustrated in Pl. 2, figs 3-6, 9. The differences between Q. pseudoreticulata Parr and d’Orbigny’s Triloculina reticulata from the Mediterranean are given by Parr (1941). Cherif (1973 : pl. 14, fig. 3) has recently illustrated the latter from the Aegean Sea. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Okinawa, west Pacific (Le Roy 1964) and Wreck Island, north-east Australia (Lloyd 1967); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951); Late Tertiary of east Borneo (? Upper Miocene-Pliocene) (Le Roy 1941) and Siberoet Island, Indonesia (? Pliocene) (Le Roy 1941a); Sub-Recent alluvia from a raised coastal platform, northern Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: South of New Guinea (Brady 1884); New South Wales (Albani 1968); central Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968); west (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964a, b) and east (Ganapati & Satyavati 1958) coasts of India; Mozambique (Moura 1965). Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny Pk 25he. 7 1826 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny : 301, no. 17. 1900 Quingqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny ; Fornasini : 364, text-fig. 9 (d’Orbigny’s unpublished figure). 1932 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny; Cushman : 28; pl. 7, figs 5—8c. 1949 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny; Said : 11; pl. 1, fig. 20. 1954 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny; Cushman, Todd & Post : 334; pl. 84, figs 1, 2. ?1956a Quinqueloculina sp. Asano : 65; pl. 7, figs 18a-c. 1968 Quinqueloculina sulcata d’Orbigny; Chiji & Lopez: 110; pl. 9, figs 7a, b. MATERIAL. 25 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:15-1:12 mm, width 0-25-0-72 mm, thickness 0:22-0-37 mm. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 31 DISTRIBUTION. Recorded in the Recent of the Red Sea (d’Orbigny 1826, Said 1949), Fiji (Cushman 1932), Marshall Is., west Pacific (Cushman, Todd & Post 1954) and Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968, ? Asano 1956a). This appears to be the first fossil record. Quinqueloculina tropicalis Cushman Figs 22-23; Pl. 1, fig. 13 1884 Miliolina gracilis (d’Orbigny) ; Brady : 160; pl. 5, figs 3a—c (non Triloculina gracilis d’ Orbigny, 1839). 1924 Quinqueloculina tropicalis Cushman : 63; pl. 23, figs 9, 10. 1959 Quinqueloculina laevigata d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante (pars): 45; pl. 5, figs 13a—c only (non d’Orbigny 1826). 1960 Quinqueloculina tropicalis Cushman; Barker : 10; pl. 5, figs 3a—c (after Brady). 1969 Quinqueloculina tropicalis Cushman; Resig : 78; pl. 2, fig. 5. 22. ZS a b Figs 22,23 Quinqueloculina tropicalis Cushman. 22a, b, P50243. Front and rear views. 23, P50244. Small slender form without apertural lip. Sample NB 9449. x 95. MATERIAL. 60 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9448, 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:25-0:72 mm, width 0:10-0:32 mm, thickness 0-12-0-30 mm. REMARKS. Cushman (1924) referred the form figured by Brady (1884) to Q. tropicalis because ‘it is very different from the original Triloculina gracilis of d’Orbigny and probably represents a species of the tropical region of the Indo-Pacific’. The majority of the Togopi specimens have an apertural lip (Figs 22a, b) but a few do not (Fig. 23). The variation is therefore very similar to that illustrated by Cushman. All our material is quinqueloculine. DIsTRIBUTION. This species has previously been described from the Recent of Papua, New Guinea (Brady 1884), the Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959) and Samoa (Cushman 1924) and from the Pleistocene of Ewa Plain, Oahu, Hawaii (Resig 1969). Genus PSEUDOMASSILINA Lacroix, 1938 Type-species: Massilina australis Cushman, 1932. Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman) Pl. 2, fig. 14; Pl. 10, fig. 2 1884 Miliolina secans (d’Orbigny); Brady : 167; pl. 6, figs 1, 2 (non Quinqueloculina secans d’Orbigny 1826). 32 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1932 Massilina australis Cushman : 32; pl. 8, figs 2a, b. 1936 Massilina agglutinans Keijzer : 120, text-figs 18, 19. 1938a Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman) Lacroix : 3, text-figs la—c. 1960 Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman); Barker: 12; pl. 6, figs 1, 2 (after Brady). MATERIAL. 5 specimens. NB 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:58-0-84 mm, width 0-62-0-90 mm, thickness 0-17-0-22 mm. REMARKS. Lack of specimens precludes studies of the test variability and wall structure. However, the latter (Pl. 10, fig. 2) appears to be identical to that described and illustrated by Lacroix (1938a). We suspect, following comments made by Lacroix (1938a:9) and Barker (1960: 12), that Massilina pacificensis Cushman, 1924 and M. australis Cushman [= Miliolina secans of Brady] are not only very similar, but also possibly synonymous. We have not seen the types, but if they were found on close study to be conspecific M. pacificensis would supplant M. australis as the name of the type-species of Pseudomassilina. Keijzer’s species, M. agglutinans, is regarded as a junior synonym; this author does not appear to have seen either of Cushman’s papers cited above. Neither is included in his bibliography (1936: 14). DISTRIBUTION. Recent of Rarotonga, Cook Is., west Pacific (Cushman 1932), Torres Strait, off north-east Australia (Brady 1884), Cauda Bay, Vietnam and the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea (both Lacroix 1938a) and northern Java (Keijzer 1936). This is thought to be the first fossil record. Pseudomassilina medioelata sp. nov. Fig. 24; Pl. 2, figs 15, 16; Pl. 10, fig. 1 1959 Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman) var. reticulata (Heron-Allen & Earland); Graham & Mili- tante : 39; pl. 3, figs 22a—c (non Massilina secans d’Orbigny var. reticulata Heron-Allen & Earland 1915). Fig. 24 Pseudomassilina medioelata sp.nov. P50089. Apertural view of holotype (see also Pl. 2, fig. 16). Sample NB 9452. x 60. Dracnosis. A Pseudomassilina with strong ribs and a very prominent last chamber in the quinque- loculine portion of the test. NAME. ‘Swollen in the middle’, from the prominence of the final chamber of quinqueloculine portion of test. HoLotyPe. BM(NH) reg. no. P50089, from sample NB 9452. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. DESCRIPTION (Holotype). Test free, initially quinqueloculine, later chambers added planispirally. Early chambers prominent with subacutely-angled chamber peripheries, later planispiral chambers more flattened. Ornament of strong ribs, oblique or at right angles to the long axis of the chambers, tending to recurve towards and extend over the chamber periphery. Surface pitted. Aperture terminal, an elongate slightly sinuous toothless slit occupying the whole face. DIMENSIONS (Holotype). Length 0-87 mm, breadth 0-82 mm, thickness 0-42 mm. VARIATION (Paratypes). Length 0:37-1:10 mm, breadth 0-:28-0-87 mm, thickness 0-25-0-42 mm. REMARKS. In our material we have four fully-developed specimens showing the typical flattened planispiral chambers of a Pseudomassilina (see holotype, Pl. 2, fig. 16) and seven specimens which FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 33 are not fully mature (see paratype, Pl. 2, fig. 15) and exhibit much closer coiled tests. Graham & Militante (1959) illustrate an immature form as P. australis var. reticulata (Heron-Allen & Earland). The syntypes of Massilina secans var. reticulata Heron-Allen & Earland, from Kerimba, have been examined and found not to be conspecific with the Togopi specimens. The Kerimba variety is a typical P. australis (compressed and fragile) and has a fine reticulate ornament. Both the Togopi specimens and those of Graham & Militante have stronger, thicker tests and are orna- mented by well-developed costae. The wall-structure has not been fully investigated, but it has the ‘granular’ appearance (PI. 10, fig. 1) described by Lacroix (1938). DISTRIBUTION. Recent of Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959); no previous fossil record. Genus PYRGO Defrance, 1824 Type-species: Pyrgo laevis Defrance, 1824. Pyrgo anomala (Schlumberger) Pil 3, fig: | 1891 Biloculina anomala Schlumberger : 569; pl. 11, figs 84-86; pl. 12, fig. 101. 1917 Biloculina anomala Schlumberger; Cushman : 79; pl. 32, figs la—c. 1921 Biloculina anomala Schlumberger; Cushman : 474; pl. 96, figs la—c. 1949 Pyrgo anomala (Schlumberger) Boomgaart : 67; pl. 5, fig. 15. 1957 Pyrgo anomala (Schlumberger); Daleon & Samaniego : 33; pl. 1, fig. 16. MATERIAL. 10 specimens. NB 9447, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:40-0:80 mm, width 0:34-0:68 mm, thickness 0-26-0-55 mm. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of eastern Java (Boomgaart 1949); Neogene, Panay Is., Philip- pines (Daleon & Samaniego 1957). Recent: Hawaiian Islands and the Philippines (Cushman 1917, 1921). Originally described by Schlumberger (1891) from the Mediterranean. Pyrgo denticulata (Brady) Pi3, fig: 2 1884 Biloculina ringens (Lamarck) var. denticulata Brady : 143; pl. 3, figs 4a, b, 5. 1915 Biloculina ringens (Lamarck) var. denticulata Brady; Heron-Allen & Earland: 551; pl. 40, figs. 11-13. 1917 Biloculina denticulata (Brady) Cushman; 80; pl. 33, figs la—c. 1932 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady) Cushman (pars) : 62; pl. 14, figs 2a, b, 6a, b only. 1954 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady); Cushman, Todd & Post : 340; pl. 85, fig. 22. 1959 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady); Graham & Militante (pars) : 39; pl. 4, figs 2a—c only. 1960 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady); Barker : 6; pl. 3, figs 4a, b, 5 (after Brady). 1961 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady); Braga : 87; pl. 8, figs 5, 6. 1969 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady); Konda: 89 (table); pl. 7, fig. 5. MATERIAL. 3 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:57-0:73 mm, width 0:47-0:65 mm, thickness 0-35-0-57 mm. REMARKS. These three specimens from the Togopi Formation have a maximum of 8 denticles or crenules on the aboral rim; the periphery, when seen in apertural view, is always subacute. Previous records of this species suggest that it is a somewhat artificial group of denticulate Pyrgo, the development of the aperture and the shape of the test in cross section being two characters which seem to vary considerably. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pleistocene of central Japan (Konda 1969). Recent: Widespread in the western Pacific (see synonymy) with two records from the east coast of Africa, viz. Kerimba Archipelago (Heron-Allen & Earland 1915) and the Mozambique Coast (Braga 1961). 34 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Genus TRILOCULINA @Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Miliolites trigonula Lamarck, 1804. Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck) Pl. 3, fig. 8 1804 Méiliolites (trigonula) Lamarck : 351, no. 3 (description). 1807 Méiliolites trigonula Lamarck; Lamarck : 236; pl. 17, fig. 4 (figures). 1826 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck) d’Orbigny : 299, no. 1; pl. 16, figs 5-9; modéle 93. 1884 Méiliolina trigonula (Lamarck) Brady (pars) : 164; pl. 3, figs 15a, b, 16 only. 1917 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Cushman : 65; pl. 25, figs 3a, b; text-fig. 31. 1931 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Hada : 85, text-figs 38a, b. 1932 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Cushman : 56; pl. 13, figs la, b. 1936 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Keijzer : 103, text-figs 7a—c. 1941 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Le Roy : 22; pl. 3, figs 26-28. 1949 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Said: 19; pl. 2, fig. 12. 1949 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Boomgaart : 66; pl. 5, fig. 13. 1951 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Asano: 17, text-figs 116, 117. 1954 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Cushman, Todd & Post : 340; pl. 85, fig. 18. 1955 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Takayanagi: pl. 1, fig. 14. 1956a Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Asano : 75; pl. 8, figs 5a, b. 1957 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Todd : 288 (table); pl. 86, figs 16a, b. 1960 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Chang: 88; pl. 7, figs 14a—15b. 1960 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Barker : 6; pl. 3, figs 15a, b, 16 (after Brady). 1961 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Braga : 75; pl. 7, fig. 1. 1961 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Huang : 86; pl. 2, figs 23, 24. 1963 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Matsunaga: pl. 30, figs 2a, b. 1964 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Bhatia & Bhalla: 79; pl. 1, figs Sa, b. 1964a Triloculina cf. trigonula (Lamarck); Rocha & Ubaldo : 413; pl. 5, figs 5a, b. 1964 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Le Roy : F20; pl. 16, figs 30, 31. 1965 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Moura: 26; pl. 3, fig. 4. 1967 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Lloyd : 92; pl. 14, figs 9 (? 8a, b). 1968 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Bhalla : 382; pl. 1, figs 2a, b. 1968 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Chiji: pl. 2, fig. 2. 1968 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Chiji & Lopez: 113; pl. 7, figs 12a, b. 1969 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Konda : 92 (table); pl. 5, figs 4a, b. 1969 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Rao : 592; pl. 3, figs 21a, b. 1970 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Matoba : 62; pl. 3, figs 3a, b. 1970 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck); Bhalla : 157; pl. 20, figs 4a, b. MATERIAL. 21 specimens. NB 9447, 9448, 9449, 9452, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:28-0:65 mm, width 0:19-0:53 mm, thickness 0-22-0-61 mm. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Taiwan (Chang 1960), eastern Java (Boomgaart 1949) and Wreck Island, north-east Australia (Lloyd 1967); Late Tertiary (? U. Miocene-Pliocene) of eastern Borneo (Le Roy 1941); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951, Matsunaga 1963) and Okinawa, west Pacific (Le Roy 1964); Pleistocene of Japan (Chiji 1968, Konda 1969). Originally described _ from the Eocene of France (Lamarck 1804, d’Orbigny 1826). Recent: A cosmopolitan species frequently found throughout the Indo-Pacific region at the present day. Triloculina bradyana (Cushman) Pl. 3, fig. 10 1884 Miliolina fichteliana (d’Orbigny); Brady : 169; pl. 4, figs 9a-c (non Triloculina fichteliana d’Orbigny, 1839). 1921 Flintina bradyana Cushman : 467. 1932 Triloculina fichteliana d’Orbigny; Cushman : 55; pl. 12, figs 6a—c. 1936 Triloculina fichteliana d’Orbigny; Keijzer : 106, text-figs 9a-e. 1959 Triloculina fichteliana d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante : 53; pl. 7, figs 10a-c. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 35 1960 Flintina bradyana Cushman; Barker: 8; pl. 4, figs 9a—c (after Brady). 1964 Flintina bradyana Cushman; Chang: pl. 2, figs la, b. MATERIAL. 13 specimens. NB 9449, 9452, ? 9453, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0:61-1:50 mm, width 0:56-1:45 mm, thickness 0-45-1-14 mm. REMARKS. We have examined specimens of Triloculina fichteliana from Jamaica (one of d’Orbigny’s original localities) and find that they compare well with the type-figure (d’Orbigny 1839: pl. 9, figs 8-10) except that they appear to develop a small apertural flap and should therefore be referrred to the genus Miliolinella. Cushman (1921) introduced Flintina bradyana for Brady’s specimens from Japan, and with this we concur, as they, like ours, are not d’Orbigny’s species. However, he included large speci- mens (up to 2 mm in length) from the Philippines which develop three planispiral chambers in the last whorl and a complex tooth: the two main diagnostic features of his new genus Flintina. The Challenger type-material (which Cushman probably never saw) includes specimens up to 1-2 mm in length, all with a narrow simple apertural tooth and no ‘Filintina-like’ coil. Since the Togopi material is also entirely triloculine and clearly conspecific with Brady’s material we refer it here to Triloculina. All forms included in the above synonymy are triloculine. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Taiwan (Chang 1964). Recent: Japan (Brady 1884); Guam (Cushman 1932), Java (Keijzer 1936) and the Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959). Cc a b Figs 25a-—c Triloculina cf. oblonga (Montagu). P50245. Specimen with terminal slit aperture in plane of coiling. Front, rear and apertural views. Sample NB 9449. x 50. 25 Triloculina cf. oblonga (Montagu) Figs 25a-c; Pl. 3, fig. 7 cf. 1803 Vermiculum oblongum Montagu : 522; pl. 14, fig. 9. MATERIAL. 27 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:24-0:85 mm, width 0-10-0-36 mm, thickness 0:08-0:25 mm. REMARKS. Triloculina oblonga, first described from the Recent of south-west England by Montagu (1803), has subsequently been applied to many different elongate, ovate, smooth miliolids from almost every part of the world. Of the Indo-Pacific records only a few are strictly conspecific with the Togopi specimens and it is for this reason and because of the provenance and imperfectly known nature of the original material that it has been decided to assign this species only tentatively to that of Montagu. The present specimens are all long and thin and except for a few small quinqueloculine forms, always triloculine. In 13 individuals the aperture is rounded or elongate, never miliolinellid, and the tooth is T-shaped. In the remainder, it is a terminal slit in the plane of coiling (Figs 25a-c), filled or closed by a long narrow tooth. Apertures of this type appear to be rare in this group. They occur, however, in Triloculina bermudezi Acosta and Miliolina deplanata Rhumbler (Recent 36 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON species from the Bahamas and Hawaii, respectively) and in specimens labelled Miliolina oblonga (Montagu) from New Caledonia, present in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History). The last-mentioned is almost certainly conspecific with our Togopi specimens. Triloculina subgranulata Cushman Pl. 3, fig. 6 1918 Triloculina subgranulata Cushman : 290; pl. 96, figs 4a-c. 1959 Triloculina subgranulata Cushman; Graham & Militante : 56; pl. 8, figs 1la—c. MATERIAL. 20 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9454. VARIATION. Length 0-30-0-61 mm, width 0-15-0-41 mm, thickness 0:12-0:32 mm. REMARKS. All our specimens have the finely granular test indicated by Cushman and Graham & Militante; a few are faintly striate. The aperture in larger specimens is more elongate than in smaller forms where it tends to be rounded. Possibly also conspecific is a Recent form figured, but not described, by Todd (1957: pl. 86, figs lla, b) as Triloculina cuneata, from Saipan, western Pacific. However, it is almost certainly not the same as Karrer’s original species of that name which was described from the Neogene of Roumania in 1867. DISTRIBUTION. Recent: Murray Island off north-east Australia (Cushman 1918) and the Philip- pines (Graham & Militante 1959). Fossil: This appears to be the first fossil record. Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny Pl. 3, fig. 9 1826 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny : 299, no. 7 (description); modéle 94. 1865 Triloculina tricarinata d’ Orbigny; Parker, Jones & Brady : 34; pl. 1, fig. 8 (after d’Orbigny’s model), 1884 Miliolina tricarinata (d’Orbigny) Brady : 165; pl. 3, figs 17a, b. 1917 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Cushman: 66; pl. 25, figs 1, 2; text-fig. 32. 1921 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Cushman : 454, fig. 37 (includes unfigured var. convexa). 1931 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny ; Hada : 86, text-figs 39a, b. 1932 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Cushman : 59; pl. 13, figs 3a, b. 1936 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Keijzer : 103, text-figs 6a, b, d, e. 19416 Triloculina tricarinata dOrbigny; Le Roy : 113; pl. 1, figs 18, 19. 1951 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Asano: 17, text-figs 114, 115. 1954 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Cushman, Todd & Post : 340; pl. 85, figs 15, 16. 1956 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Marks : 35; pl. 10, figs 22a—c. 1956 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Bhatia : 19; pl. 1, figs 16a, b. 1956a Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Asano : 73; pl. 8, figs 6a, b. 1958 Triloculina tricarinata dOrbigny; Ganapati & Satyavati: 104; pl. 2, figs 38, 39. 1958 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Sethulekshmi Amma: 8; pl. 1, figs 12, 13. 1959 Triloculina tricarinata d Orbigny; Graham & Militante : 57; pl. 8, figs 14a, b. 1960 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Barker : 6; pl. 3, figs 17a, b (after Brady). 1961 Triloculina tricarinata d Orbigny; Braga : 77; pl. 7, figs 3, 4. 1963 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Matsunaga : pl. 30, figs 1a, b. 1964 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Le Roy : F20; pl. 3, figs 32, 33. 1964a Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Rocha & Ubaldo: 413; pl. 2, figs 6a, b. 19646 Triloculina tricarinata d Orbigny; Rocha & Ubaldo: 647; pl. 2, figs 11, 12. 1965 Triloculina tricarinata dOrbigny; Moura: 26; pl. 3, fig. 2. 1968 Triloculina tricarinata dOrbigny; Antony : 38; pl. 2, figs 13a, b. 1968 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Bhalla : 381; pl. 1, figs 3a, b. 1968 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Chiji & Lopez: 113; pl. 7, figs 11a, b. 1968 Triloculina tricarinata d Orbigny; Tewari & Kumar: 42; pl. 14, fig. 5. 1968 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Hofker : 20; pl. 4, figs 7-10. 1969 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Rao : 592; pl. 3, fig. 22. 1969 Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny; Konda : 92 (table); pl. 6, figs 4a, b. MATERIAL. 152 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, ? 9453 (rock section). oa ooo FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 37 VARIATION. Length 0:28-0:80 mm, width 0:21-0:59 mm, thickness 0:20-0:65 mm. REMARKS. In the Togopi material, the chamber sides are rarely straight to gently concave as in d’Orbigny’s model, but usually slightly convex. Examination of all the specimens in the Brady Collections labelled Triloculina tricarinata d’Orbigny from the Gulf of Suez, northern Red Sea, revealed that only a few are of this type, the others having convex sides. This is also true of Brady’s Challenger material (1884). It is therefore probable that the convex-sided forms — named var. convexa by Cushman in 1921 -are more common than T. tricarinata s.s. in the Indo-Pacific and that there is intergradation in this particular feature. Furthermore, the keeled test, although smooth in the vast majority of specimens, was seen occasionally to be longitudinally costate at the proximal end of the last chamber, similar to T. tricarinata d’Orbigny var. costata Sethulekshmi Amma (1958: pl. 1, figs 13a, b). Apertures range from triangular to oval in cross section. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene (Matsunaga 1963), Pliocene (Asano 1951) and Pleistocene (Konda 1969) of Japan; Miocene and Pliocene of Okinawa, western Pacific (Le Roy 1964); Plio- Pleistocene (Le Roy 19415) and Pleistocene (Marks 1956) of Java. Recent: Ubiquitous in the western Pacific from Japan to the east coast of Australia. In addition it has been reported on a number of occasions from both the west and east coasts of the Indian subcontinent and Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Other records in the region comprise the Red Sea (type-locality of d’Orbigny 1826) and Mozambique (Braga 1961). Subfamily MILIOLINELLINAE Vella, 1957 Genus MILIOLINELLA Wiesner, 1931 Type-species: Vermiculum subrotundum Montagu, 1803. Miliolinella sp. Pll) fig. 5 MATERIAL. 12 specimens. NB 9447, 9449. VARIATION. 5 triloculine forms 2 intermediate forms 5 quinqueloculine forms Length 0:24-0:37 mm 0:28-0:35 mm 0:29-0:45 mm Width 0:19-0:23 mm 0-18-0-22 mm 0-17-0:26 mm Thickness 0-16-0-20 mm 0-12-0-19 mm 0:12-0:21 mm REMARKS. Loeblich & Tappan (1964: C466-8) restricted Miliolinella to triloculine forms, as exemplified by the type figure. Haynes (1973 : 57), however, showed that in Cardigan Bay, Wales, there is a wide range of coiling within the type-species which includes quinqueloculine forms. We therefore accept a wide concept for the genus as Wiesner had intended, and regard Scutuloris (for quinqueloculine forms) as superfluous. In the Togopi material there is intergradation between triloculine and quinqueloculine forms with two specimens just showing a fourth chamber externally. In addition, the flap-like tooth is variously developed; only in a few specimens does it fully constrict the aperture. Lack of specimens of this smooth species, however, prevents a fuller investigation of its affinities. Subfamily MILIOLINAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Genus HAUERINA d’Orbigny in de la Sagra, 1839 Type-species: Hauerina compressa d’Orbigny, 1846. Hauerina circinata Brady Figs 26a—c 1881 Hauerina circinata Brady : 17 (description). 1884 Hauerina circinata Brady; Brady : 191; pl. 11, figs 14-16 (figures). 1975 Hauerina circinata Brady; Ponder : 8, text-figs 4-24 (q.v. for synonymy). MATERIAL. | specimen (damaged). NB 9449. 38 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON DIMENSIONS. Greatest diameter 0:60 mm, thickness 0-10 mm. REMARKS. Hauerina circinata, type-species of the monophyletic genus Polysegmentina Cushman (1946: 1), has recently been extensively reviewed by Ponder (1975), based on variable Recent material from north-east Queensland. Ponder concludes that Polysegmentina cannot be separated from Hauerina either on chamber arrangement or on its possession of retral processes and sutural pores. He finds the retral process-like internal structures are not true retral processes as they do not end blindly at the chamber margins, and the sutural pores do not appear to exist. Ponder also regards H. diversa Cushman (1946: 11; pl. 2, figs 16-19) as merely immature specimens of H. circinata. DISTRIBUTION. Probably the first fossil record from the Indo-west Pacific. Figs 26a-c Hauerina circinata Brady. P50251. 26a, side view; 26b, side view in clearing medium viewed by transmitted light; 26c, apertural view. Sample NB 9449. x 55. Hauerina fragilissima (Brady) Pie3ydige 11 1884 Spiroloculina fragilissima Brady : 149; pl. 9, figs 12-14. 18986 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady) Millett : 610; pl. 13, figs 8-10. 1915 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Heron-Allen & Earland : 587; pl. 46, figs 1, 2. 1924 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Cushman : 68; pl. 25, figs 2, 3. 1932 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Cushman : 42; pl. 10, fig. 9. 1946 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Cushman : 9; pl. 2, figs 1-6, 8 (after Brady, Millett). 1951 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Asano: 11, text-figs 79, 80. 1958 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Sethulekshmi Amma: 11; pl. 1, fig. 18. Plate 3 Scanning Electron Micrographs Fig. 1 Pyrgo anomala (Schlumberger). P50091. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 70. Fig. 2 Pyrgo denticulata (Brady). P50092. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 70. Figs 3a, b ? Schlumbergerina sp. P50093. Fig. 3a, side view, x 125; fig. 3b, close-up of edentate siphonate aperture, x 500. Sample NB 9449. Figs 4a, b Edentostomina cf. millettii (Cushman). P50094. Side and apertural views. Sample NB 9452. x30. (See Fig. 6, p. 17.) Fig. 5 Méiliolinella sp. P50095. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 75. Fig. 6 Triloculina subgranulata Cushman. P50096. Side view. Sample NB 9447. x 75. Fig. 7 Triloculina cf. oblonga (Montagu). P50097. Side view. Sample NB 9450. Approx. x 60. Fig. 8 Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck). P50098. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x75. Fig. 9 Triloculina tricarinata dOrbigny. P50099. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 60. Fig. 10 Triloculina bradyana (Cushman). P50100. Side view. Sample NB 9454. x 35. Fig. 11 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady). P50101. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 60. Figs 12-13b Dendritina striata Hofker. Fig. 12, P50102. Apertural (edge) view of typical specimen. Sample NB 9449. Figs 13a, b, P50103. Side and apertural view of specimen showing rectilinear trend. Sample NB 9454. All x 30. Fig. 14 Lagena perlucida (Montagu). P50104. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 80. Fig. 15 Lagena flatulenta Loeblich & Tappan. P50105. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 200. Fig. 16 JLagena striata (d’Orbigny). P50106. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 100. Fig. 17 Lagena laevis (Montagu). P50107. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 80. Fig. 18 ‘“Pseudonodosaria’ sp. P50108. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 100. Fig. 19 ‘Pseudonodosaria’ glans (d’Orbigny). P50109. Side view. Sample NB 9460. x 100. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 40 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1959 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Graham & Militante : 35; pl. 3, fig. 9. 1960 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Barker : 18; pl. 9, figs 12-14 (after Brady). 1963 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Matsunaga : pl. 27, figs 2a, b. 1964 Massilina fragilissima (Brady) Le Roy : F20; pl. 12, fig. 31. 1968 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Chiji & Lopez: 107; pl. 10, fig. 9. 1969 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Konda : 88 (table); pl. 5, fig. 6. 1969 Heterillina fragilissima (Brady) Resig : 67; pl. 1, fig. 9. 1975 Hauerina fragilissima (Brady); Ponder : 14, text-figs 28-47. MATERIAL. 8 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0-30-0-60 mm, width 0:28-0:55 mm, thickness 0-16-0-18 mm. REMARKS. The genus Hauerina has been reviewed recently by Ponder (1975), based on his study of three Recent species from north Queensland, Australia. He shows that contrary to the definition of Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C470) the genus shows great variation in the apertural apparatus, chamber arrangement, number of chambers per whorl, involution of the test, inflation of the test and the development of the internal posterior longitudinal ridges. Our specimens are for the most part similar to Brady’s (1884) fig. 14. They have a prominent quinqueloculine early stage with later chambers half a whorl in length. We thus agree with Ponder, who, after studying large numbers of specimens, concluded that only in the later stages of larger individuals are there more than two chambers per whorl. Because of the lack of variation in our material we are not able to comment on Ponder’s conclusion that Hauerina bradyi Cushman (= H. compressa, sensu Brady and Millett) is conspecific with H. fragilissima (Ponder 1975: 18). Our synonymy is therefore confined to records of the latter species only. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene (Asano 1951, Matsunaga 1963) and Pleistocene (Konda 1969) of Japan; Pliocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964) and Plio-Pleistocene of Hawaii (Resig 1969). Recent: Widespread in the East Indies and western Pacific from central Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968) to north-west Australia (Ponder 1975). Also known with assurance from the Indian Ocean — Kerimba Archipelago, East Africa (Heron-Allen & Earland 1915) and the Travancore coast of south-west India (Sethulekshmi Amma 1958). Genus SCHLUMBERGERINA Munier-Chalmas, 1882 Type-species: Schlumbergerina areniphora Munier-Chalmas, 1882. Schlumbergerina sp. Fig. 27 MATERIAL. | damaged specimen. NB 9450. Length 1-26 mm. 27 28 Fig. 27 Schlumbergerina sp. P50252. Block section. Sample NB 9450. x 36. Fig. 28 ? Schlumbergerina sp. P50246. Thin section. Sample NB 9449. x 126. ? Schlumbergerina sp. Fig. 28; Pl. 3, figs 3a, b MATERIAL. 9 specimens. NB 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:26-0:46 mm, breadth 0:13-0:23 mm, thickness 0-10-0-18 mm. REMARKS. A very small edentate form. They are juveniles of either Ammomassilina or Schlum- bergerina, probably the latter since the chambers are being added in many planes (Fig. 28). FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 4] Family SORITIDAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Subfamily PENEROPLINAE Schultze, 1854 Genus PENEROPLIS de Montfort, 1808 Type-species: Nautilus planatus Fichtel & Moll, 1798. Peneroplis planatus (Fichtel & Moll) var. annulata nov. Pl. 8, fig. 8 1959 Peneroplis discoideus Flint; Graham & Militante: 62; pl. 9, fig. 22 (non P. pertusus Forskal var. discoideus Flint, 1899). Name. Referring to the distinctive annular coiling. MATERIAL. 2 specimens (1 broken). NB 9452. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Maximum diameter 3-30 mm, thickness at periphery 0-25 mm, height of chambers 0-03-0-06 mm, proloculus diameter 0-06 mm. DESCRIPTION. Test discoidal: a peneroplid coil of 2} whorls comprising 35-38 undivided chambers, flaring strongly in the later part, followed by up to 10 completely annular chambers. Surface finely striate. Aperture, a single row of pores on the outer face of the last chamber. REMARKS. Both Cole (1965) and Hofker (1971) illustrated and described specimens of Peneroplis discoideus from the Caribbean showing various stages of cyclical growth. Cole, however, shows quite convincingly that specimens assigned by various authors not only to this species but also to ‘Orbitolites orbitolitoides’ and ‘Sorites marginalis’, to name but two, are in fact a single species referable to Peneroplis proteus d’Orbigny. All have subepidermal partitions within the chambers, smooth tests, and are demonstrably (Cole 1965: 14) ‘. . . a continuous series in which there is progressive thickening and differential deposition of the test wall, and in which the terminal chambers become annular’. The Togopi specimens have a striate ornament and do not develop subepidermal partitions even in the final chambers. They cannot, therefore, be referred to P. proteus, but must be con- sidered, if Cole’s thesis is accepted, an annular form of the Indo-Pacific striate flabelliform species Peneroplis planatus (Fichtel & Moll). Graham & Militante figure a specimen (1959: pl. 9, fig. 12), almost certainly striate, in which cyclical chambers are not fully developed. They consider (1959 : 62) it to be a juvenile form of P. discoideus (Flint). This is, as far as we are aware, the only other record of the annular form being reported in P. planatus. Because this form is rare, and as no typical specimens of Peneroplis were found in the Togopi sediments, it has not been possible to study its specific variation. We hesitate, therefore, either to consider it worthy of separate status or, at the other extreme, to be merely conspecific. Instead, for the meantime, we have given it a varietal name, annulata. DIsTRIBUTION. The only previous record is a Recent one from north-central Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959). Genus DENDRITINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Dendritina arbuscula d’Orbigny, 1826. Dendritina striata Hofker Pl. 3, figs 12, 13a, b 1951 Dendritina striata Hofker : 234, text-figs 12-14. MATERIAL. 29 specimens. NB 9449, 9452. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 1:02-2:10 mm, thickness 0:45-0:75 mm. Height of apertural _ face 0-45-0:90 mm, width of apertural face 0-30-0-50 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl | 17-22. 42 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON REMARKS. The Togopi specimens closely resemble those described by Hofker (1951). Tests are usually closely coiled, almost involute and, in side view, virtually undistinguishable from Hofker’s (1951) text-fig. 12a. The umbilical region is flat or slightly depressed and the sutures heavy with very thick septal walls. The chamber walls, on the other hand, are relatively fragile and often broken. Scanning electron microscopy has confirmed that the longitudinal striae are indeed ‘real pits, fused together’, as observed by Hofker (1951). Nevertheless, similar striae also occur in related species. A few specimens tend to uncoil in the adult stage (PI. 3, figs 13a, b). In most mature specimens the aperture is highly dendritic (PI. 3, fig. 12), but in a few, including those with some degree of uncoiling, it becomes drawn out and subdivided into separate openings. DISTRIBUTION. The present fossil record complements Hofker’s Recent material from eastern Borneo and the Moluccas. Subfamily SORITINAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Genus MARGINOPORA de Blainville, 1830 Type-species: Marginopora vertebralis de Blainville, 1830. Marginopora cf. vertebralis de Blainville Pl. 8, fig. 6 cf. 1830 Marginopora vertebralis de Blainville : 337. cf. 1834 Marginopora vertebralis de Blainville; de Blainville : 412; pl. 69, figs 6a—c (Marginopore vertébral in plate explanation). MATERIAL. 2 specimens. NB 9449, 9452. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Maximum diameter 1-40 mm, thickness 0-30 mm. REMARKS. In these pyritized, poorly-preserved specimens, the proloculus is connected to the reniform second chamber by a flexostyle. Annular chambers, at first arcuate but later hexagonal in shape, follow immediately. There are two rows of alternating pores on the periphery. We follow Cole (1954, 1965) in regarding Amphisorus as a junior synonym of Marginopora. RANGE. The stratigraphical range of M. vertebralis s.1. is Lower Miocene to Recent (Adams 1970: 119). Family ALVEOLINIDAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Genus ALVEOLINELLA Douvillé, 1906 Type-species: Alveolina quoyi d’Orbigny, 1826. Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny) Pl. 8, fig. 11 1826 Alveolina quoii d’Orbigny : 307; pl. 17, figs 11-13. 1856 Alveolina boscii (Defrance); Carpenter : 552; pl. 28, figs 23, 24; pl. 29, figs 4-9 (non Oryzaria boscii Defrance, 1820). 1884 Alveolina boscii (Defrance); Brady : 222; pl. 17, figs 7-12. 1906 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny) Douvillé : 58. 1908 Alveolina boscii (Defrance); Chapman : 151; pl. 2, figs 1-3; pl. 3, figs 4, 5. 1921 Alveolina boscii (Defrance); Cushman : 487; pl. 99, figs 2—S. 1930 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny); Hofker : 166; pl. 41, figs 6-8; pl. 63, figs 1-11; pl. 64, figs 1-6. 1933 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 68; pl. 19, fig. 10. 1954 Alveolinella quoii (d’Orbigny); Todd & Post : 558; pl. 202, figs 5, 8. 1958 Alveolinella quoii (d’Orbigny); Cole : 767; pl. 240, figs 16-25. 1959 Alveolinella quoii (d’Orbigny); Graham & Militante : 65; pl. 10, fig. 12. 1960 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny); Barker : 34; pl. 17, figs 7-12 (after Brady). 1963 Alveolinella quoii (d’Orbigny); Coleman : 10; pl. 1, fig. 1. 1976 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny); Matsumaru : 422; pl. 5, fig. 1. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 43 MATERIAL. 181 specimens. NB 9449, 9452. VARIATION. Length 4-7 to over 12-0 mm (specimen broken), thickness 1-3—2:5 mm. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Neogene (Upper Miocene — ? Tg) of Bikini and Eniwetok Atolls (Todd & Post 1954 and Cole 1958, respectively); Pliocene of the Solomon Islands (Coleman 1963); Pleistocene of the Ryukyu (Nansei Shoto) Islands (Matsumaru 1976). See also Adams (1970: 108, 109). Recent: Commonly found today in the shallow shelf seas of the tropical East Indies from the Philippines to north-east Australia. Family NODOSARIIDAE Ehrenberg, 1838 Subfamily NODOSARIINAE Ehrenberg, 1838 Genus LAGENA Walker & Jacob in Kanmacher, 1798 Type-species: Serpula (Lagena) sulcata Walker & Jacob, 1798. Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) Pl. 8, fig. 3 1846 Oolina clavata d’Orbigny : 24; pl. 1, figs 2, 3. 21865 Lagena sulcata (Walker & Jacob) var. distomapolita Parker & Jones (pars) : 357; pl. 18, fig. 8 only. 1949 Lagena gracillima (Seguenza); Said: 21; pl. 2, fig. 28 (non Amphorina gracillima Seguenza, 1862). 195le Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) Asano : 29, text-fig. 128. 1955 Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny); Takayanagi: pl. 1, fig. 30. 21959 Lagena sulcata (Walker & Jacob) var. distomapolita Parker & Jones; Graham & Militante : 68; pl. 10, fig. 19. 1963 Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny); Matsunaga: pl. 31, fig. 6. MATERIAL. 60 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0-45 to over 0-72 mm (broken specimen), maximum breadth 0:11-0:18 mm. REMARKS. These specimens are typically shaped like Greek amphorae, with the greatest width below mid-point and the apertural end produced into a long neck with a terminal phialine lip. The base of the test has a single spine or a number of smaller spines. Many specimens in the Togopi samples become more elongate and pointed distally, thus resembling those assigned to the variety ‘distomapolita’ by Parker & Jones (1865) and Graham & Militante (1959). However, they never develop the aboral tube as in L. gracillima (Seguenza), neither do they become as inflated as those figured as L. clavata by Cushman (1913: 9; pl. 2, fig. 2) and Hada (1931 : 103, text-fig. 57). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano 195le, Matsunaga 1963). It was originally de- scribed from the Tertiary of the Vienna Basin (d’Orbigny 1846). Recent: Records of this species from the Indo-Pacific are few. Certainly conspecific are those from the Red Sea (Said 1949) and Japan (Takayanagi 1955) and possibly those from north-east Australia (Parker & Jones 1865) and the Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959). Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) var. setigera Millett Figs 29-37 1884 Lagena laevis (Montagu) var.; Brady : 455; pl. 56, fig. 30. | 1901a Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) var. setigera Millett : 491; pl. 8, figs 9a, b. _ 1933 Lagena perlucida (Montagu); Cushman : 20; pl. 4, figs 6a—8b (non Vermiculum perlucidum Montagu, 1803). | 1950 Lagena perlucida (Montagu) var.; Cushman & McCulloch : 343; pl. 46, figs 3a—4b. 1951e Lagena perlucida (Montagu); Asano : 31, text-figs 137, 138. 1959 Lagena perlucida (Montagu) var. of Cushman & McCulloch; Graham & Militante : 68; pl. 10, fig. 17. 44 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1960 Lagena laevis (Montagu) var.; Barker : 116; pl. 56, fig. 30 (after Brady). 1968 Lagena perlucida (Montagu) var. of Cushman & McCulloch; Antony : 55; pl. 3, fig. 22. 1974 Lagena oceanica Albani : 37; pl. 1, figs 7, 10, 11. MATERIAL. 76 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:17-0:42 mm, maximum breadth 0-09-0-13 mm. REMARKS. This variant differs from Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) in developing fine spines or wings, or both, from a moderately truncate base. ines vas Figs 29-37 Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny) var. setigera Millett. Showing variation in shape and ornament. 29-34, P50253. Togopi sample NB 9449. x80. 35-37, ZF3823—ZF3825. Recent, station 5, blue ooze, Malay Archipelago. x 120. Although Millett’s figured syntype cannot be recognized we have examined his residues from the Malay Archipelago and find that this species is common in the blue ooze at station 5 (Durrand 1898). Figs 35-37 show some typical specimens from this locality, while Figs 29-34 illustrate the range of variation in Togopi sample NB 9449. It is clear that the delicately “setose’ form figured by Millett (1901) is rare and susceptible to damage; usually the rounded end of the test is orna- mented by short costae or minute wings as in Lagena oceanica Albani. As Albani (1974) rightly states, this form has often been wrongly referred to L. perlucida. He therefore erected a new species, L. oceanica, without apparently realizing that a valid taxon already existed. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano 195le). Recent: Hong Kong (Brady 1884), the Malay Archipelago (Millett 1901a), Fiji (Cushman 1933), the Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959), south-west coast of India (Antony 1968) and New South Wales, Australia (Albani 1974). FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 45 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg) Pl. 8, fig. 5 1844 Miliola elongata Ehrenberg : 274 (description). 1854 Miliola elongata Ehrenberg; Ehrenberg: pl. 25, fig. 1 (figure). 1884 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg) Brady : 457; pl. 56, fig. 29. 1901a Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Millett : 492; pl. 8, fig. 10. 1913 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Cushman: 12; pl. 1, figs 5a, b. 1938c Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Asano : 217; pl. 27, fig. 37 only. 195le Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Asano : 30, text-fig. 132. 1956 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Asano : 31; pl. 5, figs 15-17 only. 1960 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Barker : 116; pl. 56, fig. 29 only (after Brady). 1963 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Matsunaga: pl. 31, fig. 7. 1964 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Rocha & Ubaldo : 57; pl. 4, fig. 4. MATERIAL. 6 specimens, mostly broken. NB 9449, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0-68-0-91 mm, maximum breadth 0:07-0:10 mm. REMARKS. The tube-like test of this form appears in the literature to encompass many more shapes than exhibited by the present material which in every case is very similar to the type-figure. The synonymy, therefore, has been restricted to elongate cylindrical forms with nearly parallel sides for a considerable distance. Preservation of the oral and suboral necks is not commonly reported — usually they are broken back — and the apertural phialine lip seen in PI. 8, fig. 5 is rare even in Recent material. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Neogene of Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964), Neogene and Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1963 and Asano 195le, respectively). The age of Ehrenberg’s original material from Kurdistan is not known. Recent: Papua (Brady 1884), Malay Archipelago (Millett 1901a) and Japanese waters (Cushman 1913, Asano 1938c and 1956). Lagena flatulenta Loeblich & Tappan Pl. 3, fig. 15 1953 Lagena flatulenta Loeblich & Tappan: 60; pl. 11, figs 9, 10. MATERIAL. 2 specimens. NB 9449. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Length 0-24 mm, width 0-15 mm. RANGE. Previously recorded only from Recent deposits. Lagena gracillima (Seguenza) Pl. 8, fig. 4 1862 Amphorina gracillima Seguenza : 51; pl. 1, fig. 57. 1884 Lagena gracillima (Seguenza) Brady (pars) : 456; pl. 56, figs 25, 26 only. 1913 Lagena gracillima (Seguenza); Cushman : 11; pl. 1, figs 4a, b. 2? 1937 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg); Yabe & Asano: 118, text-fig. 15 (? non Ehrenberg, 1844). 1960 Lagena gracillima (Seguenza); Barker : 116; pl. 56, figs 25, 26 only (after Brady). MATERIAL. 31 specimens. NB 9449, _ Variation. Length 0-98 to over 1-72 mm (specimen broken), breadth 0-13-0-25 mm. REMARKS. Our concept of this species is based on the appearance of our specimens, of which Pl. 8, fig. 4 shows a typical example. Brady’s figures (1884: pl. 56) and a number of other records not included above suggest, however, that there may be greater variation particularly in the shape _ of the central inflated part of the test. | | _ DistriBuTIONn. Fossil: First described from the Upper Miocene of Sicily, the only previous record from the Indo-Pacific appears to be that of Yabe & Asano (1937) from the Pliocene of western Java; this lack of records may be due to the fragility of the test. Recent: New Guinea and Ker- guelen Island, south Indian Ocean (Brady 1884) and Japan (Cushman 1913). 46 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Lagena laevis (Montagu) VL, Bh, whee, 117) 1784 Serpula (Lagena) laevis ovalis Walker & Boys: 3; pl. 1, fig. 9. 1803 Vermiculum laeve Montagu : 524. 1913 Lagena laevis (Montagu) Cushman: 5; pl. 1, figs 3a—c; pl. 38, fig. 5. 1931 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Hada : 102, text-fig. 56. 1933 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Cushman: 19; pl. 4, figs 5a, b. 1937 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Yabe & Asano: 118, text-fig. 7. 195le Lagena laevis (Montagu); Asano: 31, text-fig. 135 only. 1956 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Asano: 29; pl. 5, figs 6, 7. 1959 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Graham & Militante : 67; pl. 10, figs 15, 16. 1963 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Matsunaga: pl. 31, fig. 10. 1970 Lagena laevis (Montagu); Kim: 106 (table); pl. 1, fig. 9. MATERIAL. 41 specimens. NB 9449. VARIATION. Length 0-19-0-45 mm, maximum breadth 0-09-0-25 mm. REMARKS. We have attempted to assemble a synonymy of the species in the Indo-west Pacific region, based on the variation seen in our material and the appearance of the type-figure. In Lagena laevis the unornamented subglobular to inflated ellipsoidal chamber merges slowly into a usually short neck. In L. flatulenta Loeblich & Tappan (see Pl. 3, fig. 15 and p. 45), which is often confused with the present species, the long slender neck is quite distinct from the almost globular chamber. None of the specimens referred by Brady (1884: pl. 56, figs 7-14, 30) to L. laevis resemble the type and are not included. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano 195le, Matsunaga 1963) and Java (Yabe & Asano 1937). Recent: Japan (Cushman 1913, Hada 1931 and Asano 1956) and the Korean Yellow Sea (Kim 1970). The species was originally described from the south coast of England (Walker & Boys 1784). Lagena perlucida (Montagu) Pl. 3, fig. 14 1803 Vermiculum perlucidum Montagu : 525; pl. 14, fig. 3. 1858 Lagena vulgaris var. semistriata Williamson : 6; pl. 1, fig. 9 (non L. striata (Montagu) var. B semi- striata Williamson, 1848). 1931 Lagena sulcata (Walker & Jacob) var. interrupta Williamson; Hada: 110, text-fig. 66 (non L. striata (Montagu) var. « interrupta Williamson, 1848). 1963 Lagena sulcata laevicostata Cushman & Gray; Matsunaga: pl. 31, fig. 16. 1971 Lagena perlucida (Montagu); Murray : 85; pl. 33, figs 1-3. 1973 Lagena perlucida (Montagu); Haynes: 86; pl. 12, fig. 5. MATERIAL. 99 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:32-0:52 mm, maximum breadth 0-18-0-23 mm. RemaRKS. The test is subglobular to subtriangular in shape, the greatest width being just above the base. It is ornamented by 10-17 strong longitudinal ribs some of which are long, others short. In many specimens some of the longer ribs pass up into the neck where they either run longi- tudinally or spirally. At the base of the test the ribs become denticulate. Murray (1971) and Haynes (1973) have elucidated the morphology of V. perlucidum Montagu. It should no longer be confused with L. semistriata (p. 47) and L. clavata var. setigera (p. 43), but records of Montagu’s species outside British waters now need verification. The citations of Hada (1931) and Matsunaga (1963) given above are probably conspecific, while the following three species from North America are all very similar to L. perlucida: 1957a Lagena saccata Todd : 231; pl. 28, fig. 12 [from the Neogene of Alaska]. 1946 Lagena sulcata Walker & Jacob var. laevicostata Cushman & Gray : 68; pl. 12, figs 13, 14 [from the Pliocene of California]. ; | | | ‘ | | | | FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 47 1946 Lagena pliocenica Cushman & Gray var. timmsana Cushman & Gray : 68; pl. 12, figs 15-17 [from the Pliocene of California]. DISTRIBUTION. The records of Hada and Matsunaga are from the Recent and Pliocene of Japan, respectively. Now that this species has been redefined it may prove to be widespread in the Indo- Pacific. Lagena semistriata Williamson Figs 38, 39 1848 Lagena striata (Montagu) var. B semistriata Williamson : 14; pl. 1, figs 9, 10. 1931 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Hada : 105, text-fig. 60. 1933 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Cushman : 32; pl. 8, figs la, b. 1937 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Yabe & Asano: 118, text-fig. 3. 1938c Lagena semistriata Williamson; Asano (pars) : 217; pl. 25, fig. 25; pl. 27, fig. 44; pl. 29, fig. 29 only. 19415 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Le Roy: 114; pl. 3, fig. 22. 1944 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Le Roy: 22; pl. 1, fig. 14. 195le Lagena perlucida (Montagu); Asano : 31, text-figs 137, 138 (non Vermiculum perlucidum Montagu 1803). 1956 Lagena cf. perlucida (Montagu); Asano : 35; pl. 5, fig. 38. 21958 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Sethulekshmi Amma : 57; pl. 2, figs ? 87b, c. 1973 Lagena semistriata Williamson; Haynes : 87; pl. 12, fig. 6; pl. 13, fig. 4. 38 39 Figs 38, 39 Lagena semistriata Williamson. 38, P40247. Type (b). x 100. 39, P50248. Type (a). x 125. Both from sample NB 9449. MATERIAL. 44 specimens. NB 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:20-0:36 mm, maximum breadth 0:09-0:22 mm. REMARKS. Two forms are recognizable in sample NB 9449. Type (a) comprises subglobular forms with longitudinal striae confined to the basal third of the test (Fig. 39), while type (b) includes more elongate forms with longitudinal striae which are either confined to the basal part of the test or also occur on the neck (Fig. 38). This species differs from Oolina striata d’Orbigny in being _ More pear-shaped, having fewer striae (maximum of 30 against 60), a shorter, stouter neck and a more prominent phialine apertural lip. Following Haynes’ (1973) description and excellent illustration of a specimen of L. semistriata from Britain we have no hesitation in placing our specimens in this species. Formerly, particularly in the North Atlantic, it has often been confused with L. perlucida (Montagu). DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Sumatra (Le Roy 1944); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951le) and Pliocene and Plio-Pleistocene of Java (Yabe & Asano 1937 and Le Roy 19414, respectively). Recent: Originally described from the coasts of Britain (Williamson 1848) this species is found widely in the Indo-Pacific at the present day. Lagena striata (d’Orbigny) Pl. 3, fig. 16 18395 Oolina striata d’Orbigny : 21; pl. 5, fig. 12. 1932 Lagena striata (d’Orbigny) Heron-Allen & Earland : 366; pl. 10, figs 10-12. 48 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1937 Lagena striata (d’Orbigny); Yabe & Asano: 118, text-fig. 1. 1938c Lagena striata (d’Orbigny); Asano: 217; pl. 27, fig. 26; pl. 29, fig. 28. 1956 Lagena striata (d’Orbigny); Asano : 33; pl. 5, figs 28, 29. MATERIAL. 99 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:40-0:56 mm, maximum breadth 0-14-0-25 mm. REMARKS. Lagena striata was first described from the Falkland Islands by d’Orbigny (18395) and was redescribed and better illustrated by Heron-Allen & Earland (1932) from the same area. The globular to subspherical test is ornamented by a great many striae (50-60) some of which run spirally round the neck. There are many incorrect records of L. striata from the Indo-Pacific, most of which relate to L. substriata Williamson or L. sulcata (Walker & Jacob). The latter have recently been reillustrated from the type-area by Murray (1971) and Haynes (1973). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Java (Yabe & Asano 1937) and Japan (Asano 1938c). Recent: Off Japan (Asano 1956). A 40 =* 41 cee GAS Figs 40, 41 Lagena sp. Side views. P50249, Sa) ae P50250. Sample NB 9449. x 70. en Sy Lagena sp. Figs 40, 41 MATERIAL. 18 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:25-0:35 mm, maximum breadth 0-19-0-26 mm. RemaRrKSs. A globular or subglobular form with a very short neck, ornamented by faint hori- zontal bands or ridges and sometimes also weak longitudinal striae. Similar forms have been recorded by a number of authors (notably Yabe & Asano 1937: 118, text-fig. 4, and Le Roy 1941 : 29; pl. 3, fig. 104) as Lagena globosa (Montagu), but they appear to lack the horizontal bands. The present specimens are also more inflated than those originally described by Montagu from the British Isles. Genus PSEUDONODOSARIA Boomgaart, 1949 Type-species: Glandulina discreta Reuss, 1850. ‘Pseudonodosaria’ glans (d’Orbigny) Fig. 42; Pl. 3, fig. 19 1791 Nautilus (Orthoceras) comatus Batsch (pars) : 1, 4; pl. 1, figs 2c, d only. 1826 Nodosaria (Glanduline) glans d’Orbigny : 252, no. 2; modeéle 51. 1865 Nodosaria (Glandulina) glans d’Orbigny; Parker, Jones & Brady : 27; pl. 1, fig. 3 (after d’Orbigny’s model). 1902 Nodosaria (Glandulina) comata (Batsch); Millett : 512; pl. 11, fig. 2. 1902 Nodosaria (Glandulina) laevigata d’Orbigny; Millett : 509; pl. 11, figs 1a, b (non d’Orbigny, 1826). 1921 Nodosaria (Glandulina) laevigata d’Orbigny var. striatula Cushman : 186; pl. 33, fig. 12. 1944 Pseudoglandulina glans (d’Orbigny) Le Roy : 20; pl. 1, fig. 21. 1959 Rectoglandulina glans (d’Orbigny) Graham & Militante : 70; pl. 10, figs 26a—27b. MATERIAL. 33 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0-25-0-62 mm, breadth 0-20-0-43 mm. REMARKS. Batsch (1791) figured two distinct striate species under Nautilus (Orthoceras) comatus. Parker, Jones & Brady (1865), reviewing Batsch’s work, applied the name Nodosaria comata | FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 49 only to the elongate form (1791 : pl. 1, figs 2a, b); to the short stout form they assigned d’Orbigny’s name Nodosaria (Glandulina) glans, represented by his model 51. In the Togopi samples this completely uniserial species is generally ornamented by fine longi- tudinal striae and small spines on the early chambers. However, specimens from the Millett Collection (Station 12, Malay Archipelago — see Durrand 1898) suggest that considerable vari- ation may occur. Some striate specimens are hispid, others not (Millett 1902: pl. 11, fig. 2), while even other hispid specimens are non-striate (the Nodosaria (Glandulina) laevigata of Millett 1902: pl. 11, figs la, b). The presence of a few non-striate spinose individuals in our material suggests that gradation occurs between hispid and non-hispid forms as well as between striate and smooth forms. Fig. 42 ‘Pseudonodosaria’ glans (d’Orbigny). Side view of finely striate hispid specimen showing entosolenian tube. P50254. Sample NB 9449. x 75. \ lw | The generic position of the species presents some difficulty. The entosolenian tube (always present in unbroken specimens) suggests that it should be referred to the Glandulinidae, but Glandulina is initially biserial (Loeblich & Tappan 1964 : C537); the uniserial Pseudonodosaria, on the other hand, does not appear to have an internal tube. If the type-species of Pseudonodosaria does not possess an entosolenian tube then a new genus will have to be erected for those forms with uniserial chambers, radial apertures and entosolenian tubes. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Sumatra (Le Roy 1944). Recent: Malay Archipelago (Millett 1902) and the Philippines (Cushman 1921, Graham & Militante 1959). The species was originally described from the Adriatic shores of Italy (Batsch 1791, d’Orbigny 1826). ‘Pseudonodosaria’ sp. Figs 43-44; Pl. 3, fig. 18 MATERIAL. 8 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:50-0:85 mm, breadth 0:25-0:45 mm. 43 44 Figs 43, 44 ‘Pseudonodosaria’ sp. 43, P50255. Acid preparation showing entosolenian tube. Sample NB 9449. x 55. 44, P50256. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x55. REMARKS. An elongate smooth form with entosolenian tube. For further remarks on the genus see under ‘Pseudonodosaria’ glans (d’Orbigny), above. Family POLYMORPHINIDAE d’Orbigny, 1839 Subfamily POLYMORPHININAE d’Orbigny, 1839 Genus GUTTULINA d’Orbigny in de la Sagra, 1839 Type-species: Polymorphina (Guttuline) communis d’Orbigny, 1826. 50 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Guttulina pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa) Figs 45a—c 1884 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Brady (pars): 566; pl. 72, figs 14, 15 only (non Parker & Jones 1865). 1907 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Chapman : 132; pl. 10, fig. 3. 1928 Sigmoidella (Sigmoidina) pacifica Cushman & Ozawa : 19; pl. 2, fig. 13. 1929 Sigmoidina pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa) Cushman & Ozawa: 77; pl. 16, figs 12a—13c. 1930 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa) Cushman & Ozawa : 50; pl. 37, figs 3—Sc. 19516 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa); Asano: 5, text-figs 24-26. 1956 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa) var. ishizakii Chang : 120; pl. 4, figs 1la—16b. 1956 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa); Chang: 120; pl. 4, figs 17-20. 1960 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa); Barker : 150; pl. 72, figs 14, 15 (after Brady). 1963 Guttulina (Sigmoidina) pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa); Matsunaga : pl. 34, figs la, b. 1964 Guttulina pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa); Le Roy: F27; pl. 11, figs 25, 26. a 45 b Figs 45a-c Guttulina pacifica (Cushman & Ozawa). P50257. Front, rear and basal views. Sample NB 9452. x 55. MATERIAL. 24 specimens, NB 9452, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:30-0:55 mm, breadth 0:22-0:35 mm, thickness 0-22-0-35 mm. REMARKS. We have dissected a number of specimens and find the basic chamber arrangement to be approximately quinqueloculine, not sigmoidal, with each chamber extending further from the base and strongly overlapping the previous one. Dependent on this degree of overlap the chambers visible on the exterior are either 4: 3 or 3 : 3. Because of the nature of the coiling this species should be referred to Guttulina, rather than Sigmoidella (see Loeblich & Tappan 1964 : C533). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964); Miocene and younger sediments of Taiwan (Chang 1956); ? Upper Miocene/Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1963); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 19515). Recent: West Pacific from Japan (Cushman & Ozawa 1929) to south-east Australia (Chapman 1907). Genus SIGMOIDELLA Cushman & Ozawa, 1928 Type-species: Sigmoidella kagaensis Cushman & Ozawa, 1928. Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones) Fig. 46; Pl. 8, fig. 7 1865 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones : 438 (table). 1870 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Brady, Parker & Jones (pars) : 231; pl. 40, figs 15b, c only. 1884 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Brady (pars) : 566; pl. 72, figs 12, ? 13 only. 1913 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Cushman : 90; pl. 38, figs la—c. 1921 Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones; Cushman : 267; pl. 54, figs 1, 2. 1929 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones) Cushman & Ozawa: 76; pl. 16, figs 10, 11a, b. 1930 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones); Cushman & Ozawa : 140; pl. 39, figs la-c. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 51 1937 Sigmoidella bakomensis Yabe & Asano: 102; pl. 18, fig. 8. 1960 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones); Barker : 150; pl. 72, figs 12, ? 13 (after Brady). 1960 Sigmoidella bakomensis Yabe & Asano; Chang: pl. 13, figs 12—-13b. 1965 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones); Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett : 20; pl. 6, fig. 20. 1975 Sigmoidella sp. Billman & Kartaadipura : 306; pl. 1, fig. 7. MATERIAL. 13 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:58-1:35 mm, breadth 0-33-1-00 mm, thickness 0:18-0:65 mm. REMARKS. The Togopi specimens compare well with the types of Polymorphina elegantissima Parker & Jones from Storm Bay, Tasmania, and other specimens from south-east Australia in the Parker Collection. The only exception is that figured by Brady, Parker & Jones (1870: pl. 40, fig. 15a) which, as indicated by Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett (1965 : 20) is much larger and is poorly preserved. It was this specimen from Melbourne which was considered to belong to Sigmoidella kagaensis by Cushman & Ozawa (1930: 141). Fig. 46 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones). P50183. Block section. Sample NB 9450. x 20. 46 DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: There are no previous illustrations of this species under the name S. elegantissima. However, specimens of Sigmoidella sp. of Billman & Kartaadipura (1975) from the Pliocene of the Kutei Basin, eastern Borneo, have been verified by us as belonging to this species. We also regard S. bakomensis Yabe & Asano as no more than a variant and thus the stratigraphi- cal range probably extends back to the Miocene — Miocene of Java and Taiwan (Yabe & Asano 1937 and Chang 1960, respectively). Recent: Common in the warmer latitudes of the western Pacific from the Philippines (e.g. Cushman 1921) to Tasmania (e.g. Cushman 1913) and the North Island of New Zealand (Hedley, Hurdle and Burdett 1965). Family GLANDULINIDAE Reuss, 1860 Subfamily GLANDULININAE Reuss, 1860 Genus GLANDULINA dOrbigny in de la Sagra, 1839 Type-species: Nodosaria (Glanduline) laevigata d’Orbigny, 1826. Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny) Fig. 47 1826 Nodosaria (Glanduline) laevigata d’Orbigny : 252, no. 1; pl. 10, figs 1-3. 1930 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny) Cushman & Ozawa : 143; pl. 40, figs la, b. 1933 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 41; pl. 9, figs 14a, b. 1941 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 29; pl. 2, fig. 87. 19416 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 115; pl. 3, figs 42, 43. 1944 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 23; pl. 5, fig. 15. 19516 Glandulina nipponica Asano : 14, text-figs 71-72. 1959 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Graham & Militante : 70; pl. 10, figs 29a, b. 1960 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny); Chang: pl. 13, figs 8, 9. 1963 Glandulina nipponica Asano; Matsunga: pl. 33, fig. 7. MATERIAL. 7 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:24-0:62 mm, breadth 0-14-0-37 mm. REMARKS. Cushman & Ozawa (1930) reported that topotypes of G. laevigata were invariably biserial in the initial portion, not uniserial as originally figured by d’Orbigny. As this character 5 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON (Loeblich & Tappan 1964: C537) is critical to the diagnosis of the genus, our synonymy is restricted to records of specimens illustrated or described as initially biserial. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of the Vienna Basin (topotypes; Cushman & Ozawa 1930), Taiwan (Chang 1960) and Sumatra (Le Roy 1944); Late Tertiary (? Upper Miocene/Pliocene) of eastern Borneo and Japan (Le Roy 1941 and Matsunaga 1963, respectively); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 19515) and Plio-Pleistocene of Java (Le Roy 19416). Recent: The Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959) and Guam (Cushman 1933). 47 Fig. 47 Glandulina laevigata (d’Orbigny). P50258. Sample NB 9450. x 70. Su) Y/ Subfamily OOLININAE Loeblich & Tappan, 1961 Genus OOLINA d’Orbigny, 1839 Type-species: Oolina laevigata d’Orbigny, 1839. Oolina hexagona (Williamson) Pl. 4, fig. 2 1848 Entosolenia squamosa (Montagu) var. y hexagona Williamson : 20; pl. 2, fig. 23. 1960 Oolina hexagona (Williamson) Barker : 120; pl. 58, fig. 33 (? 32) (after Brady 1884). MATERIAL. 2 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:20-0:28 mm, greatest breadth 0:16-0:22 mm. RANGE. Pliocene (Asano 195le) to Recent. Oolina squamosa (Montagu) PI:.4; fig.’ 1 1803 Vermiculum squamosum Montagu: 5; pl. 14, fig. 2. 1973 Oolina squamosa (Montagu) Haynes: 110; pl. 14, fig. 14; pl. 15, figs 4, 5. MATERIAL. 8 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:20-0:43 mm, greatest breadth 0:17-0:34 mm. REMARKS. For a reinterpretation of this species see Haynes (1973 : 110-111). RANGE. Miocene (Le Roy 1964) to Recent. Genus FISSURINA Reuss, 1850 Type-species: Fissurina laevigata Reuss, 1850. Fissurina circularis Todd PI} 4, fig-3 1954 Fissurina circularis Todd in Cushman, Todd & Post : 351; pl. 87, fig. 27. MATERIAL. 4 specimens. NB 9449. VARIATION. Length 0-24-0-27 mm, breadth 0-21-0-27 mm, thickness 0:13-0:15 mm. RANGE. Uncertain; believed to be the first fossil record from the Indo—west Pacific. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 53 Fissurina radiatomarginata (Parker & Jones) Fig. 48 1865 Lagena sulcata Walker & Jacob var. marginata (Montagu) subvar. radiato-marginata Parker & Jones : 348, 355; pl. 18, figs 3a, b. 1954 Fissurina radiato-marginata (Parker & Jones) Cushman, Todd & Post: 351; pl. 87, fig. 29. MATERIAL. 2 specimens. NB 9449. DIMENSIONS. Length 0:30 mm, breadth 0-16 mm, thickness 0:09 mm. RANGE. Pliocene (Yabe & Asano 1937, Le Roy 1964) to Recent. Fig. 48 Fissurina radiatomarginata (Parker & Jones). P50259. Sample NB 9449. x 125. Fissurina spp. Figs 49-51 Species 1. Figs 49a, b. MATERIAL. 7 specimens. NB 9450, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:27-0:37 mm, greatest breadth 0-21-0-27 mm, thickness 0-18-0-23 mm. RemaRrKS. A slightly flattened smooth test; wall transparent except for densely perforate areas formmg a horseshoe-shaped opaque pattern on either side of the subacute periphery. a Figs 49a, b_ Fissurina sp. 1. P50260. Side and edge views. Sample NB 9450. x 90. Figs 50a, b Fissurina sp. 2. P50261. Side and edge views. Sample NB 9450. x 140. Figs 51a, b Fissurina sp. 3. P50262. Side and edge views. Sample NB 9450. x 80. Species 2. Figs 50a, b. MATERIAL. 5 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:22-0:25 mm, greatest breadth 0-17-0-20 mm, thickness 0:13-0:14 mm. REMARKS. Test with 16-18 ribs of unequal length: some are confined to the basal region, some to the middle, while only the principal peripheral ribs extend over the whole length of the shell. Species 3, Figs 51a, b. 54 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON MATERIAL. 7 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:22-0:39 mm, breadth 0:16-0:30 mm, thickness 0:16-0:27 mm. REMARKS. Test smooth, almost as thick as broad. There is little difference in the density of per- forations over the body of the shell, except in the apertural region where it is transparent. Family BOLIVINITIDAE Cushman, 1927 Genus BOLIVINA d’Orbigny, 1839 Type-species: Bolivina plicata d’Orbigny, 1839. Bolivina sabahensis sp. nov. Figs 52-53c; Pl. 4, fig. 4 DIAGNosIS. A moderately compressed Bolivina with a subovate periphery in apertural view. Sides of test sub-parallel, all but the last few chambers ornamented by irregularly developed longitudinal striae which cross and mask the early sutures. Figs 52-53c Bolivina sabahensis sp.nov. 52, P50113. Holotype (microspheric form), side view in clearing medium. See also Pl. 4, fig. 4. 53a—c, P50114. Paratype (megalospheric form). Side view in clearing medium, edge and aper- tural views. Both from sample NB 9450. x 85. Name. Described from Sabah, Malaysia. HOoLotyPe. BM(NH) reg. no. P50113, from sample NB 9450. MATERIAL. 41 specimens. NB 9447, 9450. DESCRIPTION (Holotype: microspheric). Test biserial, calcareous, coarsely perforate, sides hardly tapering except at initial end. Ovate in apertural view with subacute peripheries; thickness virtually constant in edge view. Initial chamber pointed; chambers, 13 in each series, increasing regularly in size and becoming slightly inflated. Ornament of irregular longitudinal striae best developed in early part of the test; on later part restricted to basal portion of chambers where it tends to overlap the sutures. Depressed sutures only seen between last three pairs of chambers. Aperture elongate, sub-terminal, reaching base of apertural face. DIMENSIONS (Holotype). Length 0-67 mm, breadth 0-20 mm, thickness 0-13 mm. VARIATION. Size range of paratypes: Microspheric (5 specimens) Megalospheric Length 0:42-0:67 mm 0:34-0:72 mm Breadth 0:14-0:20 mm 0:12-0:20 mm Thickness 0:10-0:15 mm 0-10-0-13 mm The number of chambers (including the proloculus) varies between 19 and 27 in the microspheric and between 11 and 17 in the megalospheric form. : | | | FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 55) REMARKS. The microspheric specimens are clearly distinguished by the pointed initial end; megalospheric forms are truncate initially (Fig. 53a). In both generations later sutures tend to become inclined at a greater angle than the earlier sutures. The tooth plate protrudes through the aperture and internally reaches the previous aperture. At low magnifications under the optical microscope the ornament is barely visible and the test appears glossy and highly perforate. Our specimens have been compared with the following species of similar appearance. Bolivina bilaensis Le Roy, from the Miocene of Sumatra. Bolivina tikutoensis Nakamura, from the Pliocene of Taiwan. Bolivina victoriana Cushman, from the Miocene of Australia. Bolivina vadescens Cushman, from the Recent of Fiji. None of them are thought by us to be conspecific. Our material usually differs in apertural aspect and in the number of chambers for a given size; furthermore, none of them appear to possess striate ornament although, as we have stated above, this is often difficult to see in B. sabahensis. Of the previously-described striate species of Bolivina, the widespread B. striatula Cushman is superficially similar but it has only a small number of regular costae on the early chambers and is very compressed in the later part. D. J. Belford has kindly compared our specimens with the many bolivinids in the Neogene of Papua—New Guinea (Belford 1966). He reports that although it is most similar to his own Brizalina vescistriata it is not as narrow and elongate and has less distinct striations. See also Postscript, p. 106. Genus BRIZALINA Costa, 1856 Type-species: Brizalina aerariensis Costa, 1856. Brizalina amygdalaeformis (Brady) tokiensis (Asano) Pl. 4, figs 5, 6 19385 Loxostoma amygdalaeforme iokiense Asano : 605; pl. 16, figs 3a, b. 1950a Loxostoma amygdalaeforme iokiense Asano; Asano : 10, text-fig. 41. 1964 Loxostomum amygdalaeforme (Brady) var. iokiense Asano; Le Roy : F33; pl. 2, figs 22, 23. MATERIAL. 21 specimens. NB 9448, 9449, 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0-30 to more than 0:75 mm (broken specimen), breadth 0-20-0-28 mm, thick- ness 0-13-0-16 mm. Number of chambers: microspheric form up to 18; megalospheric form 11-15. RemMARKS. This species is referred to Brizalina because it lacks the retral chamber processes (‘basal chamber lobes’ of Belford 1966) and crenulations of Bolivina. Moreover, the wall is radial in structure, not granular as in the genus Loxostomum. B. amygdalaeformis iokiensis is characterized by numerous, strong, slightly sinuous, irregularly bifurcating costae; the aperture is subterminal, rarely terminal, with an internal toothplate, bordered by raised thickened lips which are continuations of one of the marginal costae. Huang (1968) re-examined Nakamura’s species Bolivina formosana. He concluded that the type-specimen was a juvenile and illustrated other adult, but broken specimens, from the Pliocene Wumeikeng Formation of Taiwan. Unfortunately his illustrations (1968: pl. 3, figs 13, 14; pl. 8, figs 1-6; text-fig. 2) are poor and we cannot determine whether B. formosana is conspecific with our material or not, although it appears similar in size and shape. Since Nakamura’s original figure (1937 : pl. 12, figs 2a, b) may have misled subsequent workers, it is possible that Loxostomum amygdalaeforme (Brady) iokiense Asano may be a junior synonym. However, as the latter is somewhat better known and has been well illustrated, we prefer to use this name for our specimens. The raised border to the aperture (giving it a compressed appearance), plus strong costate ornament over the entire test, distinguish it from the Recent Philippines species Bolivina amyg- dalaeformis Brady. See also Postscript, p. 106. 56 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene—Pliocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 19386, 1950a) and possibly Taiwan (Nakamura 1937; Huang 1968). This subspecies does not appear to have been found in post-Pliocene deposits. Genus RECTOBOLIVINA Cushman, 1927 Type-species: Sagrina bifrons Brady, 1881. Examination of the type specimens of Sagrina bifrons Brady in the British Museum (Natural History) confirms that both generations are biserial initially, later rectilinear and uniserial, with toothplates alternating at 180°. This is in agreement with the diagnosis of Rectobolivina by Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C553). Rectobolivina raphana (Parker & Jones) Pl. 4, fig. 8 1865 Uvigerina (Sagrina) raphanus Parker & Jones : 364; pl. 18, figs 16a, b. 1884 Sagrina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Brady : 585; pl. 75, figs 21, 22, ? 23 only. 1913 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones) Cushman: 108; pl. 46, figs 1-5. 1926 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Cushman : 4; pl. 1, figs 14 (1, 2 after Parker & Jones). 1931 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Hada: 134, text-figs 91a, b. 1942 Siphogenerina raphana (Parker & Jones); Cushman: 55; pl. 15, figs 6-9. 1949 Siphogenerina raphana (Parker & Jones); Said : 34; pl. 3, fig. 26. 1950a Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Asano: 14, text-figs 56, 57. 1954 Siphogenerina raphana (Parker & Jones); Cushman, Todd & Post : 356; pl. 88, figs 23, 24. 1956 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Bhatia: 21; pl. 1, fig. 6d only. 1957 Siphogenerina raphana (Parker & Jones); Todd : 290 (table); pl. 89, figs 12a, b. 1959 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Graham & Militante : 87; pl. 13, fig. 8. 1960 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Barker : 156; pl. 75, figs 21, 22, ? 23 only (after Brady). 1962 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Kuwano: text-fig. 8 (table); pl. 22, figs Sa, b. 1963 Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Matsunaga: pl. 42, figs 8a, b. 1964a Siphogenerina raphanus (Parker & Jones); Rocha & Ubaldo: 413; pl. 5, fig. 3. 1970 Siphogenerina raphana (Parker & Jones); Kim: 107 (table); pl. 1, fig. 13. MATERIAL. 22 specimens. NB 9450. VARIATION. Length not exceeding 1-2 mm, breadth up to 0-26 mm. REMARKS. These specimens, which are all megalospheric, bear 12-14 ribs; the chamber shape varies but is usually clearly visible particularly in adult specimens. The initial portion of the shell is biserial. Toothplates in the rectilinear uniserial part alternate through 180°. These specimens are closely similar to the lectotype and paralectotypes (selected by Loeblich & Tappan 1964) which have been examined in a clearing medium and found not to include any completely uniserial form. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: ? Upper Miocene/Pliocene and Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1963 and Asano 1950a, respectively). Recent: Widespread throughout the Indo-Pacific region in Recent sediments. Rectobolivina raphana (Parker & Jones), var. MATERIAL. 8 specimens. NB 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:40-1:05 mm, breadth 0:11-0:24 mm. Number of biserial chambers up to 7, number of uniserial chambers 3-7, longitudinal ribs 7-13. REMARKS. These specimens differ from R. raphana in having a more prominent biserial portion. Rectobolivina striata (Schwager) var. curta (Cushman) Pl. 4, fig. 9 1884 Sagrina striata (Schwager); Brady : 584; pl. 75, figs (? 25), 26. 1913 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager) Cushman : 107; pl. 47, figs 4a, b, 5. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 57 1921 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager); Cushman : 280; pl. 56, fig. 5. 1926 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager) var. curta Cushman: 8; pl. 2, fig. 5. 1941 Rectobolivina bifrons (Brady) var. striatula (Cushman); Le Roy: 35; pl. 2, tigs 7, 8 (non Siphogenerina bifrons (Brady) var. striatula Cushman, 1917). 1949 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager); Boomgaart : 121; pl. 9, fig. 2. 21957 Siphogenerina 3 (S. striata (Schwager)); Daleon & Samaniego : 48; pl. 1, fig. 52. 1960 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager) var. curta Cushman; Barker (pars) : 156; pl. 75, figs (? 25), 26 (after Brady). 1961 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager); Braga: 148; pl. 15, fig. 21. 1964 Rectobolivina bifrons (Brady) var. striatula (Cushman); Le Roy : F34; pl. 3, figs 5, 6. 1964 Siphogenerina striata (Schwager) var. curta Cushman; Rocha & Ubaldo: 93; pl. 8, figs 8, 9. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9450. VARIATION. Length 0-40-1-05 mm, breadth 0:11-0:24 mm. Number of biserial chambers usually 7, number of uniserial chambers 3-7, number of ribs 20-35. REMARKS. Ribbing is variable: it may be strong and continuous over many chambers or weakly developed with breaks at the sutures. There is, however, no gradation to R. raphana (Parker & Jones) in our material. All the Togopi specimens are initially biserial with toothplates alternating at 180°, thus justifying the use of the generic name. The record of Daleon & Samaniego (1957) is questioned owing to poor reproduction of the figure in our copy of their publication. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: ? Lower Miocene of Java (Boomgaart 1949), Late Tertiary (? Upper Miocene—Lower Pliocene) of eastern Borneo (Le Roy 1941), Neogene of Panay Island, Philippines (Daleon & Samaniego 1957), Miocene—? Pliocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964) and Holocene (2 m raised beach) of Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: North Pacific (Brady 1884, etc.) and Mozambique Coast (Braga 1961). Family BULIMINIDAE Jones, 1875 Subfamily PAVONININAE Eimer & Fickert, 1899 Genus PAVONINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Pavonina flabelliformis d’Orbigny, 1826. Pavonina flabelliformis d’Orbigny Pl. 4, figs lla, b 1826 Pavonina flabelliformis d’Orbigny : 260; pl. 10, figs 10-12. MATERIAL. 1 specimen. NB 9450. Dimensions. Length 0:45 mm, breadth 0-44 mm, thickness 0-10 mm. REMARKS. A probably immature specimen with few chambers and a pointed initial end. The arrangement of the chambers in the initial portion is not known as it appeared opaque when viewed in clearing media. The apertural face is pustulate, bearing pores of various sizes. For further information on this genus see Cushman (1926: 19-24), Parr (1933) and Hofker (19510). RANGE. We believe this to be the first fossil record from Indonesia (Parr 1933). Genus CHRYSALIDINELLA Schubert, 1908 Type-species: Chrysalidina dimorpha Brady, 1881. Chrysalidinella dimorpha (Brady) Pl. 4, fig. 14 1881 Chrysalidina dimorpha Brady : 54. 1884 Chrysalidina dimorpha Brady; Brady : 388; pl. 46, figs 20, 21. MATERIAL. 4 specimens. NB 9450 (? 9449). 58 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric Length 0:70-0:94 mm 0:52-0:65 mm Width 0-30-0:'52mm 0-31-0-34 mm RANGE. Pliocene (Yabe & Asano 1937) to Recent. Genus REUSSELLA Galloway, 1933 Type-species: Verneuilina spinulosa Reuss, 1850. Reussella sp. Pl. 4, fig. 13 MATERIAL. 6 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Length 0:28-0:44 mm, breadth 0:21-0:28 mm. Number of chambers 10-14. REMARKS. Closely resembles Fijiella (Reussella) simplex (Cushman) in shape but possessing a toothplate and a single semilunar instead of a cribrate aperture. Our specimens may be compared with Verneuilina spinulosa Reuss (Brady 1884 : 384; pl. 47, figs 1a, b only), Ruessella sp. C (Todd & Post 1954: 559; pl. 199, fig. 11) and Reussella simplex Cushman (Todd 1957: pl. 89, figs 23a, b). Family UVIGERINIDAE Haeckel, 1894 Genus SIPHOGENERINA Schlumberger in Milne-Edwards, 1882 Type-species: Siphogenerina costata Schlumberger, 1883. Siphogenerina sp. Pl. 4, fig. 7 MATERIAL. 3 specimens. NB 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:50-0:60 mm, width (uniserial portion) 0:15-0:20 mm, (biserial portion) 0:17-0:21 mm. Number of chambers in uniserial and biserial portions respectively 2-3 and ? 8-10. REMARKS. Examination in a clearing medium appeared to show toothplates set at 120° apart, thus suggesting Siphogenerina rather than Rectobolivina. The early part of the test is somewhat obscured by pyrite. Genus SIPHOUVIGERINA Parr, 1950 Type-species: Uvigerina porrecta Brady var. fimbriata Sidebottom, 1918. Siphouvigerina proboscidea (Schwager) var. vadescens (Cushman) Pl. 4, fig. 10 1933a Uvigerina proboscidea Schwager var. vadescens Cushman: 85; pl. 8, figs 14, 15. 1942 Uvigerina proboscidea Schwager var. vadescens Cushman; Cushman : 50; pl. 14, figs 5-9. 1948 Uvigerina proboscidea Schwager var. vadescens Cushman; Todd in Cushman & McCulloch : 268; pl. 34, fig. 5. 1962 Uvigerina proboscidea vadescens Cushman; Kuwano: text-fig. 8 (table); pl. 24, fig. 9. 1964 Uvigerina proboscidea vadescens Cushman; Ishiwada : 41; pl. 5, fig. 78. 1964 Uvigerina proboscidea Schwager var. vadescens Cushman; Le Roy : F35; pl. 3, fig. 38. 1965 Uvigerina vadescens Cushman; Aoki: 57; pl. 7, figs 9, 10. MATERIAL. 17 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0-25-0-48 mm, breadth 0-15-0-18 mm. REMARKS. This species has been transferred to Siphouvigerina since in many adult specimens the later chambers become biserial or even uniserial, and the simple toothplate is entirely devoid of a FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 59 wing. Cushman differentiated his variety from Schwager’s species by its smaller size, more slender form and elongate apertural neck. Examination of topotype specimens of U. proboscidea from Car Nicobar, identified by Dr M. S. Srinivasan and deposited in the British Museum (Natural History), has confirmed Cushman’s varietal diagnosis. In 1965, Aoki accorded specific rank to this variety without any explanation. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene—Pliocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964), Plio-Pleistocene of Japan (Aoki 1965). Recent: Guam (Cushman 1933a), Fiji (Cushman 1942), Japan (Kuwano 1962, Ishiwada 1964) and ‘various tropical localities’ (figured specimen locality not specified —- Todd in Cushman & McCulloch 1948). Family DISCORBIDAE Ehrenberg, 1838 Subfamily DISCORBINAE Ehrenberg, 1838 Genus DISCORBIS Lamarck, 1804 Type-species: Discorbites vesicularis Lamarck, 1804. Discorbis cf. dimidiatus (Parker & Jones) Pl. 4, fig. 12 cf. 1862 Discorbina dimidiata Parker & Jones : 201, text-fig. 32b. cf. 1967 Discorbis dimidiatus (Parker & Jones); Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett: 33; pl. 1, fig. 4; pl. 10, figs 1-3; text-figs 28-43. MATERIAL. 10 specimens. NB 9447, 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:28-0:60 mm, breadth 0-21-0-25 mm, thickness 0:15-0:29 mm. Number of chambers in first whorl 5, in second 5-7 and in final whorl 4-7. REMARKS. Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett (1967), in their extensive review of Discorbina dimidiata Parker & Jones, concluded that it was specifically distinct from the Eocene Discorbites vesicularis Lamarck. Furthermore, they considered the genus Lamellodiscorbis (type D. dimidiata) to be superfluous. Our small number of immature poorly-preserved specimens are tentatively referred to Discorbis dimidiatus, based on the evidence of intraspecific variability illustrated by Hedley et al. from Australian and New Zealand Recent material. Genus GAVELINOPSIS Hofker, 1951 Type-species: Discorbina praegeri Heron-Allen & Earland, 1913. Gavelinopsis sp. Pl. 4, figs 18a, b MATERIAL. 3 complete and 8 broken specimens. NB 9447, 9449. VARIATION. Length 0:22-0:27 mm, breadth 0-20-0-25 mm, thickness 0-09-0-14 mm. Number of chambers in first, second and final whorls 5—6, 6-8 and 6-7 respectively. REMARKS. Placed in Gavelinopsis by virtue of its small umbilical plug (Loeblich & Tappan 1964 : C578). It must be noted, however, that the validity of the genus is questioned by Haynes (1973 : 161). Our poorly-preserved trochospiral specimens with coarse perforations on the spiral side are similar to Discorbina praegeri Heron-Allen & Earland and, except for the presence of a plug, to Discorbis laddi Kleinpell. Genus ROSALINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Rosalina globularis d’Orbigny, 1826. 60 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Rosalina bradyi (Cushman) Pl. 4, figs 15, 16 1884 Discorbina globularis (d’Orbigny); Brady : 643; pl. 86, figs 8a—c only (non Rosalina globularis d’Orbigny, 1826). 1915 Discorbina globularis (d’Orbigny); Heron-Allen & Earland : 694; pl. 51, figs 36-39. 1915 Discorbis globularis (d’Orbigny) var. bradyi Cushman : 12; pl. 8, figs la—c. 1933a Discorbis opima Cushman : 88; pl. 9, figs 3a-c. 1933a Discorbis micens Cushman : 89; pl. 9, figs 5a—c. 1951d Discopulvinulina bradyi (Cushman) Asano : 4, text-figs 25, 26. 1954 Discorbis globularis (d’Orbigny); Kleinpell : 56; pl. 5, figs la—c. 1954 Discorbis micens Cushman; Cushman, Todd & Post : 358; pl. 89, figs 8, 9. 1954 Discorbis opima Cushman; Cushman, Todd & Post : 358; pl. 89, figs 10, 11. 1957 Discorbis micens Cushman; Todd : 290 (table); pl. 90, figs 7a—c. 1957 Discorbis opima Cushman; Todd : 290 (table); pl. 90, figs 11a—c. 1959 Rosalina globularis d’Orbigny; Graham & Militante : 97; pl. 14, figs 12a—c. 1960 Rosalina bradyi (Cushman) Barker : 178; pl. 86, figs 8a—c (after Brady). 1967 Rosalina bradyi (Cushman); Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett : 42; pl. 1, fig. 3; pl. 11, figs 2a—c; text-figs 50-55. 1968 Rosalina bradyi (Cushman); Albani: 109; pl. 9, figs 1, 2, 5, 6. 1970 Rosalina bradyi (Cushman); Matoba : 60; pl. 4, figs 8a—c. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9447, 9449. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:25-0:55 mm, thickness 0:10-0:27 mm. Numbers of chambers in first whorl 5-7, in second 5-9 and in final whorl 4-5. REMARKS. The taxonomic position and intraspecific variation of this species have been discussed in some detail by Hedley, Hurdle & Burdett (1967). Plate 4 Scanning Electron Micrographs Fig. 1 Oolina squamosa (Montagu). P50110. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 100. Fig. 2 Oolina hexagona (Williamson). P50111. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 100. Fig. 3. Fissurina circularis Todd. P50112. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 150. Fig. 4 Bolivina sabahensis sp. nov. P50113. Side view of holotype (microspheric form). Sample NB 9450. x75. (See Fig. 52, p. 54.) Figs 5, 6 Brizalina amygdalaeformis (Brady) iokiensis (Asano). P50115, P50116. Side views of megalospheric and microspheric forms. Sample NB 9450. x 75. Fig. 7 Siphogenerina sp. P50117. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 70. Fig. 8 Rectobolivina raphana (Parker & Jones). P50118. Side view. Sample NB 9450. Approx. x 50. Fig. 9 Rectobolivina striata (Schwager) var. curta (Cushman). P50119. Side view. Sample NB 9450. Approx. x 50. Fig. 10 Siphouvigerina proboscidea (Schwager) var. vadescens (Cushman). P50120. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 100. Figs lla, b Pavonina fiabelliformis d’Orbigny. P50121. Side and apertural views. Sample NB 9450. x 100. Fig.12 Discorbis cf. dimidiatus (Parker & Jones). P50122. Ventral (umbilical) view. Sample NB 9449. x75: Fig. 13 Reussella sp. P50123. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 100. Fig. 14 Chrysalidinella dimorpha (Brady). P50124. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 50. Figs 15,16 Rosalina bradyi (Cushman). P50125, P50126. Dorsal and ventral views. Sample NB 9447. Both specimens x 75. Fig. 17 Siphoninoides echinatus (Brady). P50127. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 100. Figs 18a, b Gavelinopsis sp. P50128. Ventral and dorsal views. Sample NB 9447. x 100. Figs 19a, b, 20 Cymbaloporetta plana (Cushman). Figs 19a, b, P50130, P50129. Dorsal and ventral side of ‘Tretomphalus’-form. Fig. 20, P50131. Ventral side of specimen without float-chamber. All specimens from sample NB 9449, x75. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION Soe J 4) iat Fae 7g 62 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Upper Miocene/Lower Pliocene of Fiji (Kleinpell 1954); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951d). Recent: Recorded from Japan to New South Wales and New Zealand, and from the Kerimba Islands (Mozambique). Subfamily BAGGININAE Cushman, 1927 Genus CANCRIS de Montfort, 1808 Type-species: Nautilus auricula Fichtel & Moll, 1798. Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll) Pl. 5, fig. 10 1798 Nautilus auricula Fichtel & Moll var. «: 108; pl. 20, figs a-c; var. 8: 110; pl. 20, figs d-f. 1921 Pulvinulina auricula (Fichtel & Moll) Cushman : 329; pl. 69, figs 3a—c. 1931 Cancris auricula (Fichtel & Moll) Hada : 139, text-figs 94a-c. 1939 Cancris auricula (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy : 259; pl. 3, figs 1-3. 1941 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy: 41; pl. 2, figs 79-81. 19416 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy: 117; pl. 3, figs 7-9, 16-18. 1942 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Cushman & Todd: 74; pl. 18, figs 1-11. 1944 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy : 36; pl. 3, figs 4-9. 1949 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Said : 38; pl. 4, fig. 9. 1951d Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Asano: 19, text-figs 144, 145. 1956 Cancris auricula (Fichtel & Moll); Bhatia : 23; pl. 5, figs Sa, b. 1959 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Graham & Militante : 91; pl. 13, figs 18a, b. 1960 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Chang; pl. 14, figs 8a—c. 1963 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Matsunaga: pl. 47, figs 8a, b. 1964 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy : F39; pl. 6, figs 23, 24. 2? 1964 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Carter : 84; pl. 5, figs 87-89. 1965 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Todd: 22; pl. 5, figs 5a—c. 1966 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Belford : 96; pl. 15, figs 1-5. 1968 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Antony : 97; pl. 7, figs Sa, b. 1971 Cancris auricula (Fichtel & Moll); Rao : 170 (table), text-fig. 52. 1974 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll); Lutze : 29; pl. 6, figs 108, 109. MATERIAL 22 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:35-0:77 mm, breadth 0-23-0-58 mm, thickness 0:15-0:24 mm. Number of chambers 7-8. REMARKS. For comments on this species see Cushman & Todd (1942), who figured topotypes and whose illustrations (pl. 18, figs 4a—c) have formed the basis for subsequent identifications; Haynes (1973 : 147) compares and contrasts it with the closely-related Cancris oblongus Williamson. The specific name has been variously construed as auriculus, auricula and auriculatus, the last- mentioned name being modified without reason by de Montfort (1808 : 267) from Fichtel & Moll’s original name. The gender of Cancris is discussed by MacFadyen & Kenny (1934: 180) who con- cluded that it should be taken as being masculine. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Sumatra (Le Roy 1939, 1944) and Taiwan (Chang 1960); late Tertiary (? Upper Miocene-Lower Pliocene) of east Borneo (Le Roy 1941); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951d, Matsunaga 1963), Okinawa (Le Roy 1964), New Guinea (Belford 1966) and Victoria, Australia (? Carter 1964); Plio-Pleistocene of Java (Le Roy 19415). The types are from the Pliocene of Italy (Fichtel & Moll 1798, Cushman & Todd 1942) (= var. a) and the Recent of the Mediterranean (= var. 8). Recent: This species appears to be common throughout the Indo-Pacific at the present day. Cancris sp. PIS, fig: 5 MATERIAL. 9 specimens. NB 9447, 9449. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 63 VARIATION. Length 0:20-0:35 mm, breadth 0:18-0:26 mm, thickness 0:15-0:21 mm. Number of chambers 7-13, with 5-6 in the final whorl. REMARKS. A small species with lobulate periphery. It may have affinities with Baggina gibba Cushman & Todd (1944a: 104; pl. 16, figs 8a—c) and the Discorbina rugosa d’Orbigny of Egger (1893: 191; pl. 15, figs 1-3). The umbilical area is open in larger specimens, closed in smaller, usually with a lip. The former features are common to both Baggina and Valvulineria, while the apertural lip suggests Cancris. Family GLABRATELLIDAE Loeblich & Tappan, 1964 Genus SCHACKOINELLA Weinhandl, 1958 Type-species: Schackoinella sarmatica Weinhandl, 1958. ‘Schackoinella’ globosa (Millett)? Pl. 5, figs 11, 12a, b; Pl. 10, fig. 6 1903a Discorbina imperatoria (d’Orbigny) var. globosa Millett : 701; pl. 7, figs 6a, b. 1915 Rotalia erinacea Heron-Allen & Earland : 720; pl. 53, figs 23-26. 1963 ‘Eponides’ globosus (Millett) Ujiié : 233; pl. 1, figs 27a—c only. 1967 Pararotalia minuta (Takayanagi); Matoba : 256; pl. 27, figs 5a, b (non Rotalia ? minuta Takayanagi, 1955). 1967 Pararotalia minuta (Takayanagi) var. Matoba : 256; pl. 27, figs 6a, b. 1968 Pararotalia cf. imperatoria (d’Orbigny) var. globosa (Millett); Chiji & Lopez : 109; pl. 12, figs Sa—c. 1971 Schackoinella sarmatica Weinhandl; Haman & Christensen : 44, text-figs 1-3 (non S. sarmatica Weinhandl 1958). MATERIAL, 43 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:14-0:25 mm, thickness 0:07-0:15 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl 5-6. REMARKS. This small, calcareous, monolamellar, perforate, almost planoconvex species bears one spine on each of the later-formed chambers; the coil is a low trochospire. The umbilical area is infilled thus obscuring the aperture, but it is probably umbilical extra-umbilical. Heron-Allen & Earland (1915) found that their material from Kerimba was conspecific with Millett’s (1903a) types. Unfortunately, Millett’s types have not been isolated in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History) and therefore it has only been possible to compare the Togopi specimens with R. erinacea Heron-Allen & Earland. We consider them to be conspecific. These authors’ new name, however, is not now necessary: at the time (1915) they referred the species to Rotalia and thus rightly considered the name globosa was preoccupied by Nonionina globosa von Hagenow, a Cretaceous species from Germany, which was also, they believed, a Rotalia. As the name globosa is a secondary homonym it can be used for our form, as the two species are certainly not congeneric (see I.C.Z.N. code, articles 57 and 59c). Millett’s name, further- more, is acceptable as a taxon in the species-group as it is published with the term ‘variety’ before 1961 and therefore is to be interpreted as denoting subspecific rank (articles 45d(i), 45e(i)). Article 46 states that at the same time it is available as a specific name. Specimens of Schackoinella sarmatica identified by Haman & Christensen from the Yellow Sea have been studied by us under the scanning electron microscope. They are probably juveniles of the present species. It is considered better to place this species in Schackoinella, as defined by Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C591), than in Pararotalia, the apertural characteristics of which are very different. Recently the suprageneric position of Schackoinella within the Rotaliina has been disputed by El-Naggar (1971), who would include it within the Globigerinacea. We believe that S. globosa may have been confused with Rotalia murrayi Heron-Allen & Ear- land (1915 : 721; pl. 53, figs 27-34) by some earlier workers. At Kerimba, the type area for both species, they occur together in abundance only at stations 7 and 8. In size they are closely similar, See Postscript, p. 106; species transferred to Murrayinella Farias, 1977 (? Rotaliidae). 64 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON but ‘Rotalia’ murrayi is clearly separated by the coarse rugosity of the test which in places is projected into ‘acute papillae’ as described by Heron-Allen & Earland. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Plio-Pleistocene (Matoba 1967) and Holocene (Ujiié 1963) of Japan. Recent: Malay Archipelago (Millett 1903a), Kerimba Archipelago, East Africa (Heron-Allen & Earland 1915), Tanabe Bay, Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968) and the Yellow Sea (Haman & Christen- sen 1971). Family SIPHONINIDAE Cushman, 1927 Genus SIPHONINOIDES Cushman, 1927 Type-species: Planorbulina echinata Brady, 1879. Siphoninoides echinatus (Brady) Pl. 4, fig. 17 1879 Planorbulina echinata Brady : 283; pl. 8, figs 3la—c. 1884 Truncatulina echinata (Brady) Brady : 670; pl. 96, figs 9-14. 1915 Truncatulina echinata (Brady); Heron-Allen & Earland : 711; pl. 53, fig. 1. 1915 Siphonina echinata (Brady) Cushman : 42; pl. 18, figs 14 (after Brady); text-figs 46, 47. 21927 Siphoninoides echinata (Brady) Cushman: 13; pl. 4, figs ? 7a, b only. 1949 Siphoninoides echinata (Brady); Said : 38; pl. 4, fig. 6. 1954 Siphoninoides echinata (Brady); Cushman, Todd & Post : 361; pl. 89, figs 31, 32. 1957 Siphoninoides echinata (Brady); Todd : 290 (table); pl. 91, figs 7a, b. 1959 Siphoninoides echinatus (Brady); Graham & Militante : 102; pl. 16, figs 2a, b. 1960 Siphoninoides echinata (Brady); Barker : 198; pl. 96, figs 9-14 (after Brady). 1965 Siphoninoides echinatus (Brady); Todd : 23; pl. 15, figs 5, 6. 1969 Siphoninoides echinatus (Brady); Resig : 84; pl. 5, fig. 5. MATERIAL. 8 specimens. NB 9447, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:21-0:32 mm. REMARKS. Hofker (1970: 32; pl. 33) discusses Siphoninoides from the Caribbean and tentatively assigns it to the Glabratellidae. Unfortunately we are not in a position to verify his findings due to lack of material. Western Pacific material from the ‘Challenger’ and Millett collections shows that the strength and number of the spines and prominence of the sutures in the last whorl are variable in this species. The correct ending for the specific name is echinatus. According to MacFadyen & Kenny (1934) all genera ending in -oides should be taken as being masculine. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pleistocene, Ewa Borehole, Hawaii (Resig 1969). There is a further possible fossil record from the Miocene of Victoria, Australia. Recent: Common in the western Pacific islands (excluding Japan). Said (1949) records it from the Red Sea. Family EPISTOMARIIDAE Hofker, 1954 Genus EPISTOMAROIDES Uchio, 1952 Type-species: Discorbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones, 1865. Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones) Pi5; figs 152: Pl? 10h fig: 17 1865 Discorbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones : 421; pl. 19, figs 8a—c. 1884 Discorbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones; Brady : 652; pl. 91, figs la—c. 1915 Discorbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones; Heron-Allen & Earland : 698; pl. 52, figs 19-23. 1927 Rotalia polystomelloides (Parker & Jones) Hofker : 35; pl. 16, figs 1-6. 1938 (2?) Epistomaria polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Howchin & Parr : 303; pl. 17, figs (? 5, ? 6), 7, 11-13. 1952 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones) Uchio: 158; pl. 7, figs 1a—3c. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 65 1954 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Cushman, Todd & Post : 360; pl. 89, fig. 26. 21954 Epistomaria polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Crespin : 45; pl. 6, figs 8a, b. 1957 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Todd : 290 (table); pl. 93, figs 10a—c. 1959 Epistomaroides rimosus (Parker & Jones); Graham & Militante : 94; pl. 14, figs 4a—c (non Discor- bina rimosa Parker & Jones, 1862). 1960 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Barker : 188; pl. 91, figs la-c (after Brady). 1965 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Le Calvez: 191; pl. 13, fig. 2. 1965 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Todd : 25; pl. 10, figs 5, 6a—c. 1969 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones); Resig : 59; pl. 5, figs 10a, b. MATERIAL. 23 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:41-1:25 mm, thickness 0:12-0:35 mm. Number of chambers in first whorl 5-6, second whorl 5-9, final whorl 7-10. REMARKS. Loeblich & Tappan (1964) rediagnosed the genera Epistomaroides and Epistomaria and selected lectotypes for their respective type-species Discorbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones and Discorbina rimosa Parker & Jones. D. rimosa, according to them, is restricted to the Eocene of Europe. All the Recent Indo-Pacific specimens labelled D. rimosa in the Parker Collection (British Museum (Natural History)) are without exception clearly referable to D. polystomelloides, as are Parker & Jones’ Recent records of D. rimosa from the Australian coral reefs (in Carpenter 1862) and India (1865); similarly, Graham & Militante’s specimen (1959 : pl. 14, figs 4a—c) from the Philippines is almost certainly D. polystomelloides. The paralectotypes of Epistomaroides polystomelloides (BM(NH) no. ZF 3602) show that there is a considerable range of variation within the species from a coarsely roughened test (see Parker & Jones’ type-figure) to one where surface ornament is reduced and the septal bridges are clearly defined (see specimens illustrated by Heron-Allen & Earland 1915). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of South Australia (Howchin & Parr 1938, Crespin 1954); Pleistocene of Hawaii (Resig 1969). Recent: Widespread in the western Pacific from Japan to Australia, with two records from east Africa (Comores, Le Calvez 1965, and Kerimba Archi- pelagos, Heron-Allen & Earland 1915). Genus PSEUDOEPONIDES Uchio in Kawai et al., 1950 Type-species: Pseudoeponides japonica Uchio, 1950. Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio Figs 54a-c 1950 Pseudoeponides japonica Uchio in Kawai et al. : 190, text-fig. 16. 1950 Epistomaria (Epistomariella) miurensis Kuwano : 315; figs 3a—c, 10. 1951 Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio; Uchio : 38; pl. 3, figs la—c. 1951d Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio; Asano : 19, text-figs 138-140. 1963 Pseudoeponides japonica Uchio; Matsunaga: pl. 45, fig. 7. 1964 Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio; Le Roy : F39; pl. 9, figs 20-22. 1967 Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio; Matoba : 256; pl. 26, figs 20a—c. Figs 54a-c Pseudoeponides japonicus Uchio. P50263. Ventral, dorsal and peripheral views. Sample NB 9449. x 90. 66 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON MATERIAL. 5 specimens. NB 9447, 9449. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:26-0:35 mm, thickness 0:16-0:23 mm. REMARKS. The Togopi specimens agree closely with the type and most subsequent figures except that the supplementary sutural apertural slits on the ventral side tend to be much less conspicuous and less highly curved. DISTRIBUTION. ? Upper Miocene/Lower Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1963) and Okinawa (Le Roy 1964); Pliocene (Kuwano 1950, Uchio 1950, 1951, Asano 1951d) and Plio-Pleistocene of Japan (Matoba 1967). The species does not appear to have been found living today. Family ROTALIIDAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Subfamily ROTALIINAE Ehrenberg, 1839 Genus AMMONIA Briinnich, 1772 Type-species: Nautilus beccarii Linné, 1758. Ammonia annectens (Parker & Jones) Pl. 5, fig. 9 1865 Rotalia beccarii (Linné) var. annectens Parker & Jones : 422; pl. 19, figs 11a—c. 1904 Rotalia annectens Parker & Jones; Millett : 505; pl. 10, figs 6a—c. 1940 Streblus annectens (Parker & Jones) Ishizaki : 58; pl. 3, figs 12a, b, 13a, b. 1956 Streblus annectens (Patker & Jones); Bhatia : 22; pl. 3, figs 1, 2. 1961 Rotalia annectens Parker & Jones; Huang: 87; pl. 4, figs 10, 11. 1964 Streblus annectens (Parker & Jones); Bhatia & Bhalla: 79; pl. 2, figs la—c. 19646 Streblus annectens (Parker & Jones); Rocha & Ubaldo: 417; pl. 4, figs 3a—c. 1964 Ammonia annectens (Parker & Jones) Huang: 50; pl. 2, figs 3a—c; pl. 3, figs 1, 2; text-fig. 3. MATERIAL. 145 specimens. NB 9448, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9456/7, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric form Megalospheric form Maximum diameter 1:00-1:61 mm 0:59-1:25 mm Thickness 0:50-0:85 mm 0:40-0:65 mm Number of chambers in first whorl 5-6 47 Number of chambers in second whorl 7-8 8-12 Number of chambers in third whorl 7-9 9-16 Number of chambers in final whorl 15=22 7-17 Plate 5 Scanning Electron Micrographs Figs 1, 2 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones). P50132, P50133. Dorsal (spiral) and apertural views. Sample NB 9450. Both specimens x 50. Fig. 3. Pararotalia calcar (d’Orbigny). P50134. Ventral view of ornate specimen akin to Calcarina nicobarensis Schwager. Sample NB 9449. x 60. Fig. 4 Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny). P50135. Ventral view. Sample NB 9452. x 60. Fig. 5 Cancris sp. P50136. Ventral view. Sample NB 9447. x75. Figs 6a-—c Ammonia togopiensis sp. nov. P50137. Apertural, ventral and dorsal views. Holotype, sample NB 9449. x 30. Figs 7a-c_ Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang. P50138. Apertural, ventral and dorsal views. Sample NB 9452. x 60. Figs 8a, b Ammonia beccarii (Linné) var. tepida (Cushman). P50139. Dorsal and ventral views. Sample NB 9450. x 100. Fig. 9 Ammonia annectens (Parker & Jones). P50140. Ventral view. Sample NB 9449. x 30. Fig. 10 Cancris auriculus (Fichtel & Moll). P50141. Ventral view. Sample NB 9450. x 75. Figs 11, 12a, b ‘Schackoinella’ globosa (Millett). Fig. 11, P50142. Dorsal view. Sample NB 9447. Figs 12a, b, P50143. Ventral and oblique views. Sample NB 9450. All x 200. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 68 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON REMARKS. Our specimens compare favourably with the type-figure of Parker & Jones 1865; the external trace of the toothplate clearly distinguishes it from Streblus yabei Ishizaki and Rotalia beccarii (Linné). The size, prominence and dissection of the umbilical plug, together with the development of the toothplate (protoforamen of Hofker, 1968) are its most striking features. Examination of the Togopi material and of specimens from Hong Kong in the Parker Collection (BM(NH) no. 1894:4:3:1468) confirms Bhatia’s observation (1956: 22) that in A. annectens there are two openings on the apertural face: a primary cameral aperture and beneath the umbili- cal portion of the chamber a toothplate foramen (see Hofker 1968) connected both to that of the previous chamber and to the protoforamen of the previous suture. As, however, the latter is not a true cameral aperture this species conforms to the diagnosis of Ammonia given by Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C607) and thus the use of the genus Rotalidium stipulated by Hof ker (1968: 28) is unnecessary. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene (Huang 1964) and Pleistocene (Huang 1964, Ishizaki 1940) of Taiwan. Recent: Hong Kong and Fiji (Parker & Jones 1865), Malay Archipelago (Millett 1904), Singapore (Ishizaki 1940), Penghu Is. (Huang 1961) and various Indian localities (Bhatia 1956, Bhatia & Bhalla 1964, Rocha & Ubaldo 19645). Ammonia beccarii (Linné) var. tepida (Cushman) Pl. 5, figs 8a, b 1926a Rotalia beccarii (Linnaeus) var. tepida Cushman : 79; pl. 1. 1937 Rotalia hozanensis Nakamura : 141; pl. 12, figs 4a—c. 1954 Rotalia cf. R. beccarii var. tepida Cushman; Cushman, Todd & Post : 360; pl. 89, fig. 22. 1957 Streblus beccarii (Linné) var. tepida (Cushman) Todd : 290 (table); pl. 9, figs Sa—c. 1963 Strebulus beccarii (Linné) var. tepida (Cushman); Chiji : 65; pl. 7, figs Sa—6b, 8a, b (misspelling). 21963 Ammonia cf. beccarii (Linné) tepida (Cushman) Ujiié: pl. 2, figs 7a—c. 1964 Streblus beccarii tepida (Cushman); Le Roy : F38; pl. 4, figs 16, 17. 1964 Ammonia hozanensis (Nakamura) Huang: 53; pl. 1, figs 4a—c. 1965 Streblus beccarii tepida (Cushman); Todd : 29; pl. 6, figs la—c. 1967 Ammonia beccarii tepida (Cushman); Konda : 33 (table); pl. 4, figs 9a, b. 1968 Ammonia beccarii (Linné) var. tepida (Cushman); Chiji & Lopez: 104; pl. 12, figs 3a—4b. 1968 Ammonia beccarii tepida (Cushman); Chiji : 58 (table); pl. 3, figs 4a, b. 1968 Ammonia hozanensis (Nakamura); Huang: 90; pl. 5, figs 1-3. 1971 Discorbis tepida (Cushman) Seibold : 44; pl. 5, figs 4-6; pl. 6, figs 1-3; text-fig. 1. Plate 6 Scanning Electron Micrographs Figs 1, 2 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones). Apertural views. Fig. 1, P50144. Conical megalospheric specimen. Sample NB 9460. Fig. 2, P50145. ‘Outgrown’ adult megalospheric test. Sample NB 9449. Both specimens x 35. Figs 3-5 Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalman). Fig. 3, P50146. Ventral view of megalospheric form. Sample NB 9454. Fig. 4, P50148. Ventral view of microspheric form. Sample NB 9452. Fig. 5, P50147. Dorsal view of microspheric form. Sample NB 9454. All specimens x 20. Figs 6a-8b Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann). Figs 6a, b, P50149. Microspheric form, apertural and ventral views. Sample NB 9466. Fig. 7, P50150. Megalospheric form, apertural view. Sample NB 9449. Figs 8a, b, P50151. Megalospheric form, dorsal and ventral views. Sample NB 9460. All specimens x 25. Figs 9a, b Cellanthus hailei sp. nov. P50152. Apertural and side views. Holotype, sample NB 9452. x25: Figs 10a, b Cribrononion tikutoensis (Nakamura). P50153. Apertural and side views. Sample NB 9452. x 60. Fig. 11 Parrellina hispidula (Cushman). P50154. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 60. Fig. 12 Cribrononion reticulosus (Cushman). P50155. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 60. Figs 13a, b Cellanthus adelaidensis (Howchin & Parr). P50156. Apertural and side views. Sample NB 9449. x 25. Figs 14a, b Elphidium cf. fax barbarense Nicol. P50157. Side and apertural views. Sample NB 9449. x 30. Z iS) & < = fo) Je, a [e) 8 = eo 35 by o} < fe iw =| Zz = < 4 oO a 70 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON MATERIAL. 35 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:09-0:35 mm, thickness 0:09-0:20 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl 5-6. REMARKS. In the Togopi samples this variety of the cosmopolitan species Ammonia beccarii shows varying degrees of chamber inflation in the final whorl. The earlier sutures, however, are limbate and flush. The umbilical depression is usually somewhat infilled with secondary material but is not plugged. We have examined topotypic material housed in the BM(NH) from San Juan Harbour, Puerto Rico and consider ours to fall well within the range of variation found there. Rotalia hozanensis Nakamura is clearly a junior synonym as suggested by Huang (1968 : 90). Schnitker (1974) studied cloned cultures of several North American ‘species’ of Ammonia, including A. tepida (Cushman), and concluded that only A. beccarii (Linné) was a valid taxon. For the present we follow his suggestion that the various “ecophenotypes’ should be recognized on an informal basis as varieties, while at the same time noting the conflicting findings of Seibold (1971), who on studying the internal structure of three members of the A. beccarii ‘group’ from south-west India concluded that only R. beccarii var. sabrina Shupack was a true Ammonia. R. beccarii var. tepida she placed in Discorbis, while R. pauciloculata Phieger & Parker was regarded as a species of Pseudoeponides. Clearly some further clarification of this problem is necessary. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Taiwan (Nakamura 1937, Huang 1968) and Okinawa (Le Roy 1964), Pleistocene of Japan (Chiji 1963, Konda 1967) and Taiwan (Huang 1964) and Holocene of Japan (Ujiié 1963). Recent: Widespread in the tropical waters of the Indo-Pacific. OB Figs 55a—c Ammonia takanabensis (Ishizaki). P50264. Ventral, dorsal and peripheral views. Sample NB 9447. x 115. Ammonia takanabensis (Ishizaki) Figs 55a-c 1948 Streblus takanabensis Ishizaki : 57; pl. 1, figs 5a-c. 1948 Streblus nakamurai Ishizaki : 62; pl. }, figs 4a—c. 1950 Rotalia maruhasii Kuwano : 314, text-figs 2a—c. 1951d Rotalia takanabensis (Ishizaki) Asano : 16, text-figs 124-126. 2.1960 Streblus sp. cf. S. takanabensis Ishizaki ; Chang: pl. 14, figs ? 10a—c only. 1964 Rotalia takanabensis (Ishizaki); Kikuchi: pl. 5, figs 5, 6. 1964 Streblus takanabensis Ishizaki; Ishiwada : 14, 15 (table); pl. 6, figs 93a, b. 1964 Ammonia takanabensis (Ishizaki) Huang: 56; pl. 1, figs 2a—c. 1967 Ammonia takanabensis (Ishizaki); Matoba : 251; pl. 27, figs 3a—c. 1970 Ammonia takanabensis (Ishizaki); Kim : 108 (table); pl. 2, figs 4a—c. MATERIAL. 9 specimens. NB 9447. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:20-0:30 mm, thickness 0:12-0:16 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl 7-9. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 71 DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene (Huang 1964) and possibly Miocene (Chang 1960) of Taiwan; Pliocene (Ishizaki 1948, Kuwano 1950, Asano 1951d) and Pleistocene (Matoba 1967, Kikuchi 1964) of Japan. Recent: Japan (Ishiwada 1964), Yellow Sea, west Korea (Kim 1970). Ammonia togopiensis sp. nov. Pl. 5, figs 6a—c; Pl. 10, figs 4, 5 1975 Ammonia ikebei (Inoue & Nakaseko); Billman & Kartaadipura : 306; pl. 1, figs 2a, b (non Rotalia ikebei Inoue & Nakaseko 1951). DraGcnosis. A large inflated trochoid species of Ammonia with rounded peripheries. Sutures of strongly convex dorsal side straight and incised. Ventral surface slightly to strongly convex, umbilical area infilled by large raised fissured plug. Chambers usually smooth and coarsely perforate. NAmE. Described from the Togopi Formation. HOLOTYPE. BM(NH) reg. no. P50137, from NB 9449, MATERIAL. 40 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9456/7, 9460. DESCRIPTION (Holotype: microspheric). Test calcareous, coarsely perforate, trochoid; periphery lobulate in side view, rounded in edge view. Slightly convex ventral surface showing 15 chambers in the last whorl and deeply fissured sutures lined by very faint bands or beads of hyaline shell material. Chambers slightly inflated, their umbilical ends bearing a non-perforate hyaline flap covering a space which is not in connection with the chamber by an aperture. Umbilical area infilled by a raised imperforate fissured plug. Dorsal surface strongly convex, early chambers obscured by thickening of the basal wall; later, sutures become depressed, radiate and straight giving a characteristic almost square shape to the chambers. In the final whorl chambers become quite inflated. Apertural face flat, confined to the ventral side. Aperture, an areal opening with lip and constriction. Dimensions (Holotype). Maximum diameter 1-48 mm, thickness 0-75 mm, diameter of plug 0:50 x 0-40 mm, height of apertural face 0-35 mm. VARIATION. Size range of paratypes: Microspheric Megalospheric Maximum diameter 0:90-1:75 mm 0:30-0:90 mm Thickness 0-68-1-00 mm 0:30-0:53 mm Plug diameter up to0:830mm_ sirup to 0-63 mm The number of whorls varies from 4 to 8 in the microspheric, and between 2 and 33 in the megalo- spheric form. Up to 19 chambers have been recorded in the last whorl of the microspheric form, while 10-13 chambers have been counted in the megalospheric form. The megalospheric form is always biconvex, while the microspheric form varies between nearly planoconvex and biconvex dependent on the development of the plug (compare PI. 5, fig. 6a and Pl. 10, fig. 4); in addition, some beading may be developed on the spiral sutures of the former generation. Other variables common to both generations are the prominence of the tooth- plate (very slight in the holotype), situated a quarter of the distance along the chamber from the plug, and the dissection of the plug which may be fissured around its edge or strongly dissected into pluglets. REMARKS. The only previous record of this species is under the name of Ammonia ikebei (Inoue & Nakaseko) from the Kutei Basin, offshore eastern Kalimantan (Borneo). There Billman & Kartaadipura (1975) use it as a Plio-Pleistocene zone fossil. However, their A. ikebei Zone, the top of which is placed at the highest stratigraphic occurrence of the nominate species, contains only rare planktonic foraminifera; calcareous nannoplankton are entirely absent. This age assignment is thus based solely on stratigraphic position. Material of this species kindly supplied by Billman from Kerindingan Well no. 1 shows that it occurs also in the preceding Asanoina Zone, which they date as Pliocene on nannoplankton. ie J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Billman & Kartaadipura (1975: pl. 1, figs 2a, b) figure a typical megalospheric form of our new species. However, their identification as R. ikebei, an obscure Miocene form from Japan sub- sequently stated by Asano (1951d: 15) to be ‘an aberrant form’ of Rotalia nipponica Asano, is unsatisfactory. Inoue & Nakaseko (1951 : text-figs 4a—c) show a much smaller form with curved instead of straight sutures on the dorsal side, many fewer chambers and a relatively smaller non- dissected plug on the ventral side. DISTRIBUTION. Pliocene and Pleistocene of the Kutei Basin, eastern Borneo. The species does not appear to be living today. Genus ASTEROROTALIA Hofker, 1951 Type-species: Rotalina (Calcarina) pulchella d’Orbigny in de la Sagra, 1839. Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny) Figs 56a—-59c; Pl. 5, fig. 4 1839 Rotalina (Calcarina) pulchella d’Orbigny : 80; pl. 5, figs 16-18. 1884 Rotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny) Brady : 710; pl. 115, figs 8a, b. 1899 Rotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Flint : 332; pl. 76, fig. 3. 1927 Rotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Hofker : 37; pl. 16, figs 7-10. 1933 Rotalia trispinosa Thalmann : 249; pl. 12, figs la-c (= Indo-Pacific forms). 1933 Rotalia cubana Thalmann : 249; pl. 12, figs 2a—-3b (= Cuban forms). 1937 Rotalia trispinosa Thalmann; Yabe & Asano: 103; pl. 18, fig. 11. 1951d Rotalia trispinosa Thalmann; Asano: 17, text-fig. 127. 19516 Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny) Hofker : 505, figs 343, 344. 1956 Rotalia trispinosa Thalmann; Marks : 43; pl. 25, figs 45a-f. 1958 Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Reiss & Merling: pl. 2, figs 2, 3; pl. 5, figs 12, 13. 1958 Rotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Ganapati & Satyavati : 104; pl. 5, figs 120, 121. 1960 Asterorotalia trispinosa (Thalmann); Barker : 238; pl. 115, figs 8a, b (after Brady). 1964 Asterorotalia trispinosa (Thalmann); Bhatia & Bhalla : 80; pl. 1, figs 10a, b. 1964 Asterorotalia trispinosa (Thalmann); Le Roy : F39; pl. 6, figs 18, 19. 1964 Asterorotalia trispinosa (Thalmann); Huang: 60; pl. 2, figs 10a, b; pl. 3, fig. 9. Plate 7 Scanning Electron Micrographs Figs 1, 2a, b Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll). Fig. 1, P50158. Side view of microspheric form. Figs 2a, b, P50159. Side and apertural views of megalospheric form. Both specimens from sample NB 9452. x 15. Figs 3a, b Cellanthus biperforatus sp. nov. P50160. Apertural and side views. Holotype, sample NB 9452. x25. (See Fig. 61, p. 84.) Figs 4a, b Cribroelphidium dentense sp. nov. P50161. Apertural and side views. Holotype, sample NB 9452. x 60. Figs 5-7 Elphidiella indopacifica Germeraad. Fig. 5, P50162. Side view of microspheric form. Figs 6, 7, P50163, P50164. Megalospheric specimens, side and apertural views. All from sample NB 9447. x 30. Figs 8,9 Calcarina hispida Brady. P50165, P50166. Ventral views. Sample NB 9450. x 30. Fig. 10 Gypsina globula (Reuss). P50167. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 20. Fig. 11 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio. P50168. Ventral view. Sample NB 9450. x 60. Fig. 12 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem). P50169. Ventral view. Sample NB 9450. x 60. Fig. 13 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny). P50170. Dorsal view. Sample NB 9449. x 45. Figs 14, 15 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman). Fig. 14, P50171. Ventral view. Sample NB 9449. Fig. 15, P50172. Dorsal view. Sample NB 9450. Both specimens x 45. Fig.16 Caribeanella ogiensis (Matsunaga). P50173. Dorsal view. Sample NB 9450. x 60. (See Fig. 64, p. 101.) Fig. 17 Florilus asanoi nom. nov. P50174. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 80. (See Fig. 70, p. 104.) Figs 18a,b Hanzawaia nipponica Asano. P50175. Dorsal (spiral) and ventral views. Sample NB 9450. x 100. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 74 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 1968 Asterorotalia trispinosa (Thalmann); Bhalla : 382; pl. 2, figs 1a, b. 1968 Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Hofker : 27; pl. 8, figs 8-10; pl. 9, figs 1-7. 1971 Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny); Huang : 82, text-fig. 4D. MATERIAL. About 500 specimens. NB 9448, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9453, 9454, 9455, 9456/7, 9460. VARIATION. Diameter 0-21 x 0-16—-0-97 x 0-68 mm (excluding spines), thickness 0-11-0-30 mm. aieN SK TOTES Dem) Figs 56a-59c_ Asterorotalia pulchella (d’Orbigny). 56-58, showing variation in shape as seen in Togopi sample NB 9449. P50265—P50267. Apertural and dorsal views. 56, 57, x35; 58, x40. 59a—c, ZF3826. Ventral, dorsal and apertural views. Recent, Dry Harbour, Jamaica. x 35. Plate 8 Figs 1-10. Light microscopy Figs 11-17. Scanning Electron Micrographs Fig. 1 Amphistegina cf. lessonii d’Orbigny. P50176. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 30. Fig. 2 Amphistegina cf. wanneriana Fischer. P50177. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 30. Fig. 3 Lagena clavata (d’Orbigny). P50178. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 100. Fig. 4 Lagena gracillima (Seguenza). P50179. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 50. Fig. 5 Lagena elongata (Ehrenberg). P50180. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 50. Fig. 6 Marginopora cf. vertebralis de Blainville. P50181. Side view. Sample NB 9449. x 30. Fig. 7 Sigmoidella elegantissima (Parker & Jones). P50182. Side view. Sample NB 9450. x 40. Fig. 8 Peneroplis planatus (Fichtel & Moll) var. annulata nov. P50184. Side view. Sample NB 9452. x 15. Figs 9, 10 Heterostegina sp. Fig. 9, P50185. Split specimen showing early part of the test. Sample NB 9452. x 15. Fig. 10, P50186. External view. Sample NB 9452. x 10. Fig. 11 Alveolinella quoyi (d’Orbigny). P50187. Detail of part of apertural face. Sample NB 9452. Scale = 100 um. Fig. 12 Globigerina quinqueloba Natland. P50188. Oblique ventral view of broken specimen. Sample NB 9447. x 175. Fig. 13. Globigerinita glutinata (Egger). P50189. Oblique peripheral view of broken specimen. Sample NB 9449. x 200. i Fig. 14 Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny. P50190. Oblique ventral view. Sample NB 9450. x 175. Fig. 15 Globigerinoides ruber (d’Orbigny). P50191. Dorsal view. Sample NB 9449. x 100. Fig. 16 Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady). P50192. Oblique ventral view. Sample NB 9460. x 150. Fig. 17 Hastigerina siphonifera (d’Orbigny). P50193. Oblique side view. Sample NB 9460. x 125. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 76 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON REMARKS. The species occurs in all but the highest samples in the Togopi Formation and is most common in the middle of the succession. In the two lowermost samples (NB 9456/7, 9455) it is rare, poorly preserved and weakly ornamented, but from NB 9454 upwards A. pulchella becomes plentiful and the ornament (bars and beads) on the dorsal surface varies from very sparse to heavy on both chambers and sutures. The test is triangular to subcircular in side view and lenticular to semiglobular in apertural view. The specimens become more inflated higher in the succession and in NB 9449 a grading series is seen between lenticular and semiglobular forms (Figs 56a—58b). In NB 9448, only semiglobular forms occur. This intraspecific variation appears to be greater than is usually observed in Recent sediments from the Malay Archipelago, but there is no evi- dence in our samples of the evolutionary lineage (A. inspinosa—A. pulchella) postulated by Huang (1971), although it would be expected in rocks of this age. At Togopi, Asterorotalia inspinosa (see below) occurs in the same samples as A. pulchella. There is a problem concerning the relationship between the Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean form, called by Thalmann Rotalia cubana. The only published record of this species from the Caribbean area appears to be that of d’Orbigny (1839) from Cuba. However, specimens in the Heron-Allen & Earland collection in the BM(NH), labelled Dry Harbour, north Jamaica (Figs 59a-c) seem, in our opinion, identical to many from the Togopi samples and there is, therefore, no reason to continue the use of different specific names for specimens from the two areas. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964) and Japan (Asano 1951d); Upper Miocene/Lower Pliocene of Java (Yabe & Asano 1937); Pleistocene of Taiwan (Huang 1964, 1971) and Java (Marks 1956). Recent: Appears to be confined in our area to Indonesia and the coasts of India. Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang Pl. 5, figs 7a—c; Pl. 10, fig. 3 1963 Rotalia nipponica Asano; Matsunaga: pl. 45, figs 9a—c (non R. nipponica Asano 1936). 1964 Ammonia nipponica (Asano) Huang: 54; pl. 2, figs la—c. 1971 Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang : 83; pl. 1, figs 1la—Sc; text-fig. 4A. MATERIAL. 295 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric forms Megalospheric forms (two specimens) Maximum diameter 0:64 mm 0:40-0:92 mm Thickness 0:38 mm 0:20-0:48 mm Number of whorls 4 3-4 Number of chambers in first whorl 1 5 Number of chambers in second whorl 1 8-9 Number of chambers in third whorl 10 9-11 Number of chambers in fourth whorl 11 11 REMARKS. Although lacking spines this species is retained in Asterorotalia since it has sutural plates on the ventral side. In the Togopi specimens the beading on either side of the ventral sutures varies in prominence and density. The umbilical plug may be pronounced (for example in many specimens of sample NB 9450) or partially or completely covered (see PI. 5, fig. 7b), its presence being only discovered by dissection or thin-sectioning. The cameral aperture is interiomarginal with lips; the plates of the labial apertures are much shorter than in the type-species. DISTRIBUTION. Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1963); late Miocene to late Pliocene of Taiwan (Huang 1964, 1971). Genus PARAROTALIA Le Calvez, 1949 Type-species: Rotalia inermis Terquem, 1882. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 77 Pararotalia calcar (d’Orbigny) Pivots: 3 1826 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny : 276, no. 1; modéle 34. 1865a Calcarina calcar @Orbigny; Parker, Jones & Brady : 24; pl. 3, fig. 87 (after d’Orbigny’s model). 1866 Calcarina nicobarensis Schwager : 261; pl. 7, fig. 3. 1884 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny) Brady : 709; pl. 108, figs 3a—c only. 1893 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Egger : 423; pl. 19, figs 1-3. 1915 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 69; pl. 28, figs 2a—c; pl. 29, figs 2a—c. 1921 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 350; pl. 71, figs 3a, b. 1927 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Hofker : 37; pl. 17, figs 1-13. 1934 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny)?; Caudri : 146; pl. 5, figs 7-9. 1941a Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 84; pl. 7, figs 1-3. 1946 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny; Germeraad : 70; pl. 4, fig. 1. 1946 Calcarina umbilicata Germeraad : 71; pl. 4, figs 2-5. 1954 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Kleinpell : 61; pl. 7, figs 5, 6. 1954 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Todd & Post : 560; pl. 202, figs la—c; pl. 203, figs 2, 3a, b. 1958 Rotalia calcar (d’Orbigny); Sethulekshmi Amma: 71; pl. 3, figs 113a, b. 1959 ‘Rotalia’ calcar (d’Orbigny); Graham & Militante : 99; pl. 15, figs 2—3c. 1960 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny; Barker : 222; pl. 108, figs 3a—c only (after Brady). 1964 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny; Rocha & Ubaldo: 153; pl. 19, figs 5-7. 1965 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny; Le Calvez: 191; pl. 13, fig. 1. 1965 Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny; Jell, Maxwell & McKellar : 277; pl. 44, figs 5a, b. 1970 Pararotalia calcar (d’Orbigny) Hofker : 55; pl. 41, figs 1-5; pl. 46, fig. 1. MATERIAL. 26 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:33-0:90 mm, thickness 0:17-0:20 mm. REMARKS. These specimens are placed in Pararotalia as they have laterally elongated chambers, a plugged umbilicus and an interiomarginal and curved intercameral aperture. Ornament is variable and consists of pustules, particularly over the umbilical area, hyaline ridges along the chambers and hispid spines. We have examined numerous Recent specimens attributed to Calcarina calcar d’Orbigny, including topotypic material from Madagascar, and conclude that the Togopi specimens fall within the range of variation of this species. DisTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Fiji (Kleinpell 1954) and of Soemba Is., Indonesia (Caudri 1934), Neogene of Kar Nicobar, Indian Ocean (Schwager 1866), “Young-Neogene’ of Ceram Is., Indonesia (Germeraad 1946), post-Miocene of Bikini (Todd & Post 1954), Late Tertiary (? Plio- cene) of Siberoet Is., Indonesia (Le Roy 1941a) and a sub-Recent raised beach in northernTimor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: Widespread in the Indian Ocean and in the East Indies and west Pacific Islands from Borneo to northern Australia. We know of no records from Japan. Pararotalia cf. nipponica (Asano) Figs 60a-c cf. 1936 Rotalia nipponica Asano: 614; pl. 31, figs 2a-c. cf. 1937 Rotalia taiwanica Nakamura: 141; pl. 12, figs 6a-c. cf. 1951d Rotalia ozawai Asano : 15, text-figs 115-117. ks Figs 60a—c Pararotalia cf. nipponica (Asano). P50268. Ventral, dorsal and peripheral views. Sample NB 9447. x 100. 78 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON MATERIAL. 24 specimens. NB 9446, 9447. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-18-0-29 mm, thickness 0:13-0:21 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl 7-10. Remarks. A number of authors (e.g. Ujiié 1966, Bhalla 1972) have considered the possibility that Rotalia nipponica, R. taiwanica and R. ozawai may be conspecific. R. nipponica is much larger than R. taiwanica (the types are twice the size), but Ujiié and Bhalla state the only other differences appear to be that the latter has a more lobulate periphery and smaller number of chambers. R. ozawai is similar in size to R. taiwanica and differs only in posses- sing small peripheral spiny projections. Furthermore, these two are often found together in Recent (e.g. Graham & Militante 1959) and fossil (e.g. Huang 1964) sediments. All three have a strong umbilical plug and belong to the genus Pararotalia. As all our material is small and of the P. taiwanica type we are not able to study variation and therefore can only concur tentatively with the thesis that P. nipponica is the only valid taxon. DISTRIBUTION. Pararotalia nipponica, ‘P. taiwanica’ and ‘P. ozawai’ all have a geological record extending back to the Miocene. They occur widely in the Indo-Pacific today. Genus PSEUDOROTALIA Reiss & Merling, 1958 Type-species: Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones in Carpenter, 1862. Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones) Pl. 6, figs 1, 2; Pl. 10, figs 12, 13 1826 Gyroidina conoides d’Orbigny : 278, no. 9 (nom. nud.). 1853 Faujasina sp. Williamson : 87; pl. 10, figs 1-6. 1862 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones in Carpenter : 213; pl. 13, figs 7-9. 1884 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Brady : 707; pl. 115, figs 7a—c. 1893 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Egger : 422; pl. 19, figs 10-12. 1899 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Flint : 332; pl. 76, fig. 1. 1906 Gyroidina conoides d’Orbigny; Fornasini : 69; pl. 4, figs 8a, b (d’Orbigny’s unpublished figures). 1927 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Hofker : 39; pl. 18, figs la—4; pl. 19, figs 1-12; pl. 21, figs 1, 2, Ts i, WS 1934 Rotalia conoides (d’Orbigny) Thalmann : 431; figs 2, 3a—c. 1936 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Keijzer : 132; pl. 4, figs 3-5, 7-10; text-fig. 26. 1937 Rotalia conoides (d’Orbigny); Yabe & Asano: 104; pl. 18, fig. 9. 1937 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones var. Yabe & Asano: 104; pl. 19, fig. 10. 1940 Streblus schroeterianus (Parker & Jones) Ishizaki : 59; pl. 3, figs 5a—6b, 9a—10b;; pl. 4, figs 7, 8. 1956 Rotalia conoidea (d’Orbigny); Marks : 41; pl. 21, figs 43a—c. 1958 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones) Reiss & Merling: 13; pl. 1, figs 15-17; pl. 2, fig. 1; pl. 5, fig. 15. 1958 Rotalia papillosa Brady; Ganapati & Satyavati : 100 (list); pl. 5, figs 124, 125 (non Brady 1884). 1960 Streblus schroeterianus (Parker & Jones); Barker : 238; pl. 115, figs 7a—c (after Brady). 1962 Rotalia conoides (d’Orbigny); Visser & Hermes : 60, fig. 65a. 1964 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana schroeteriana (Parker & Jones); Huang: 60; pl. 1, fig. 12. 1968 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones); Hofker : 30; pl. 10, figs 4-18. 1968 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones); Bhalla : 384: pl. 2, fig. 2. 1971 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones); Hofker : 31; pl. 73, figs 1-6; pl. 74, figs 1-11. MATERIAL. 256 specimens. NB 9446, 9448, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric Maximum diameter 0:90-1:14 mm 0:21-1:50 mm Thickness 0:90-0:94 mm 0:20-1:20 mm Number of chambers in first whorl 5 47 Number of chambers in second whorl 5-6 6-11 Number of chambers in last whorl 9-11 7-14 REMARKS. In the present material the microspheric form has a flat spiral and a high conical umbilical side with single or double rows of beading along the sutures. The umbilical plug is FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 79 added to the apex of the newest chamber but because of the high conical test shape the plug development on earlier chambers remains prominent, simulating a lateral displacement, whereas it is in reality terminal in relation to each chamber. The majority of megalospheric specimens are similar to the microspheric (see PI. 6, fig. 1; Pl. 10, fig. 12), but some show a tendency, previously noted by Keijzer (1936) and Hofker (1927, 1968 and 1971), to ‘outgrow’ this shape, and by adding additional whorls with convex peripheries a proportionately much lower test is produced with a truncate ventral apex (see PI. 6, fig. 2; Pl. 10, fig. 13). The evidence of Keijzer and Hofker, together with our observations on material from the Malay Archipelago, leads us to conclude that the conical form (= ‘Gyroidina conoides’ d’Orbigny) is typical of immature specimens and that adults tend to lose their conical shape. In addition to the variation described above, two large megalo- spheric forms in sample NB 9449 resemble Asanoina globosa (Yabe & Asano), but are less trochoid dorsally than the type figure. The type-specimen of Rotalia schroeteriana could not be found despite an extensive search of the Parker & Jones and Carpenter Collections, whilst the only remaining specimen of William- son’s Faujasina sp. does not fit the ascribed figure (1853: pl. 10, fig. 3) nor is a locality given. The single specimen recorded by Heron-Allen & Earland (1915) from Kerimba, Mozambique, has rather deeply incised sutures and is not considered conspecific wth those from the western Pacific. Belford’s figured specimens from the Pliocene of Papua (1966: pl. 70, figs 12-16), like- wise, appear to belong to another species. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene (Yabe & Asano 1937), Pliocene (Thalmann 1934) and Pleistocene (Marks 1956) of Java; Pliocene of Papua (Hofker 1971) and Taiwan (Ishizaki 1940, Huang 1964); Plio-Pleistocene of western New Guinea (Irian) (Visser & Hermes 1962). Recent: Widespread in the tropical western Pacific from Taiwan to Australia and particularly common in the islands of the Malay Archipelago. Also reported from the Bay of Bengal. Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann) Pl. 6, figs 3-5; Pl. 10, figs 10, 11 1934 Rotalia catilliformis Thalmann : 437; pl. 11, figs 1—3d. 1937 Rotalia catilliformis Thalmann; Yabe & Asano: 104; pl. 19, fig. 10. 1937 Rotalia tikutoensis Nakamura: 141; pl. 12, figs 7a—c. 1940 Streblus tikutoensis (Nakamura) Ishizaki : 60; pl. 3, figs 14a, b; pl. 4, figs 12, 13 only. 1962 Rotalia catilliformis Thalmann; Visser & Hermes : 60, fig. 65c. 1964 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana tikutoensis (Nakamura) Huang: 61; pl. 2, figs 9a—c; pl. 3, figs 7, 8. 1966 Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann) Belford : 114; pl. 21, figs 4-10. 1968 Pseudorotalia catalliformis (Thalmann); Huang: 91; pl. 3, figs 15-17 (misspelling). 1975 Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann); Billman & Kartaadipura : 306; pl. 1, figs 4a—c. MATERIAL. 398 specimens. NB ? 9449, 9450, 9452, 9453, 9454, 9455, 9456/7, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric Maximum diameter 1:30-2:26 mm 1:22-1:60 mm Thickness 0:50-0:74 mm 0:55-0:85 mm Numbers of chambers in final whorl 16-27 13-23 Number of chambers in second whorl 6 10-17 Number of chambers in first whorl 5 5-10 Number of whorls not exceeding 43 34 REMARKS. The microspheric test of the Togopi specimens varies considerably in thickness. There are examples, in a large population in NB 9452, of the very thin specimens with slightly concave venters, as figured by Thalmann (1934), with gradation to the thicker form illustrated in Pl. 6, figs 4, 5, identical to Rotalia tikutoensis Nakamura. The plug is very large and highly perforate, usually opaque. The spire is generally low, the dorsal side being only slightly convex, some speci- mens in NB 9460, however, having a higher spire. The amount of beading on the sutures is variable. The megalospheric test (Pl. 6, fig. 3) is much smaller, with an acute periphery, and is usually more trochoid. The ventral surface nevertheless is very flat. 80 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Little comparative work has previously been undertaken on R. catilliformis and R. tikutoensis. The latter was first described from the Pliocene Byoritu beds of Taiwan and was separated from R. catilliformis by being less compressed, less concave ventrally and possessing fewer than 25 chambers in the final whorl. Huang (1964) was originally of the opinion that R. tikutoensis was a subspecies of R. schroeteriana Parker & Jones, but in 1968, having re-examined Nakamura’s type, considered it to be synonymous with Thalmann’s species, a conclusion with which we agree. We do not consider Streblus tikutoensis (Nakamura) of Chang (1960: pl. 2, figs 13a—-c), from the upper Miocene of Taiwan, to be conspecific with our material, but it may have affinities with Rotalia indopacifica Thalmann. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Java (Yabe & Asano 1937); Pliocene of Java (Thalmann 1934), Taiwan (Nakamura 1937, Huang 1964 and Ishizaki 1940) and Papua (Belford 1966); Plio- Pleistocene of western New Guinea (Irian) (Visser & Hermes 1962). Billman & Kartaadipura (1975) do not record P. catilliformis above the late Miocene in the Kutei Basin of east Borneo. Nevertheless, specimens of their P. tikutoensis, which they kindly sent to us from higher in Kerin- dingan Well no. 1, fall within the variation seen in our material, and thus extend the range of the species up into the Plio-Pleistocene of this area as well. Recent: P. catilliformis does not appear to be living in the Indo-Pacific today. Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann) Pl. 6, figs 6a—8b; Pl. 10, figs 7-9 1899 Rotalia papillosa Brady; Flint : 332; pl. 76, fig. 2 (non Brady 1884). 1921 Rotalia schroeteriana Parker & Jones; Cushman : 347; pl. 73, figs la-c (non Parker & Jones in Carpenter 1862). 1935 Rotalia indopacifica Thalmann : 605. 1940 Streblus indopacificus (Thalmann) Ishizaki : 54; pl. 3, figs la, b; pl. 4, figs 1-6. 1951d Rotalia indopacifica Thalmann; Asano : 13, text-figs 99, 100. 1957 Rotalia indopacifica Thalmann; Samaniego & Gonzales : 203; pl. 23, figs 10a—c. 1963 Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann) Huang: pl. 4, figs 23a, b. 1964 Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann); Huang: 60; pl. 1, figs 7a—c; pl. 3, fig. 4. 1970 Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann); Kim: 108 (table); pl. 2, figs 6a-c. MATERIAL. 168 specimens. NB 9448, 9449, 9452, 9453, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric Maximum diameter 0:96-2:10 mm 0:41-1:30 mm Thickness 0:55-1:30 mm 0:28-0:80 mm Number of chambers in final whorl 16-24 8-18 (usually 13-18) Number of chambers in second whorl 6-8 7-14 Number of chambers in first whorl 4-6 5-7 REMARKS. Our material has been compared with specimens in the BM(NH) from Albatross Station D5313, China Sea (see Cushman’s localities, 1921 : 347). In this sample the microspheric form attains 2-5 mm in diameter and appears to be identical with the type-figure. The megalo- spheric form is usually 1-2 mm in diameter and has 5-6, 10-11 and 14-16 chambers in the first, second and final whorls. It is either compressed, thus almost equally biconvex, or more highly trochoid dorsally. It has a small plug dissected into beadlets. In both generations the umbilical ends of the chambers have small hyaline flaps and the test is beaded along both spiral and cameral sutures. The canal system opens along the ventral sutures with a double row of pores, a feature characteristic of the genus. In sample NB 9460 some specimens ar ehighly trochoid dorsally, reminiscent of Rotalia alveiformis Thalmann (see PI. 10, fig. 8), but the vast majority are closely similar to the topotypic specimens described above. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Taiwan (Huang 1963); Pliocene of Taiwan (Huang 1964), Japan (Asano 1951d) and the Philippines (Samaniego & Gonzales 1957). Recent: Philippines (Cushman 1921), Korean Yellow Sea (Kim 1970) and Taiwan (Ishizaki 1940); Flint’s ‘Albatross’ FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 81 locality is not recorded. Probably it is widespread in the Indo-Pacific at the present day, but has been confused with other species of Pseudorotalia. Family CALCARINIDAE Schwager, 1876 Genus CALCARINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Nautilus spengleri Gmelin, 1788. Calcarina hispida Brady Pl. 7, figs 1, 2; Pl. 10, fig. 14 1862 Calcarina sp. (hispid variety); Carpenter, Parker & Jones : 218; pl. 14, figs 6, 7. 1876 Calcarina hispida Brady : 589. 1884 Calcarina hispida Brady; Brady : 713; pl. 108, figs 8, 9. 1921 Calcarina hispida Brady; Cushman : 356; pl. 75, fig. 4. 1943 Calcarina hispida Brady; Gnanamuthu ; 18; pl. 4, figs 9a—c. 1954 Calcarina hispida Brady; Cushman, Todd & Post : 363; pl. 90, figs 9-12. 1959 Calcarina hispida Brady; Graham & Militante : 106; pl. 17, figs 5a—7b. 1959 Calcarina spengleri (Gmelin) Graham & Militante (pars) : 107; pl. 17, figs 8a, b, and 13a, b only. 1960 Tinoporus hispidus (Brady) Barker : 222; pl. 108, figs 8, 9. 1961 Calcarina hispida Brady; Huang: 88; pl. 5, figs 1-4, 20, 21. 1964 Calcarina spengleri (Gmelin); Le Roy : F40; pl. 5, fig. 3 (non Nautilus spengleri Gmelin 1788). 1965 Calcarina hispida Brady; Jell, Maxwell & McKellar : 277; pl. 44, figs 4a, b. 1968 Calcarina hispida Brady; Chiji & Lopez: 105; pl. 12, figs 8a, b. 1968 Calcarina hispida Brady; Antony : 100; pl. 7, fig. 8. 1970 Calcarina hispida Brady; Hofker : 63; pl. 43, figs 5-13; pl. 47, fig. 3. MATERIAL. 118 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9460. VARIATION. Greatest diameter up to 1-5 mm (excluding spines), thickness up to 0-7 mm. Number of whorls 13-34, number of chambers in second whorl 9-14. RemaRKS. This highly variable suite of rather poorly preserved specimens closely resembles the C. hispida/rustica group. The chambers in the last whorl are prominent or obscure, while in cross section the test varies in its biconvexity, the chamber peripheries being either rounded or acute. The spines, never more than nine, arise at any angle along a suture and are always hispid, a charac- ter separating this species from Calcarina spengleri (Gmelin) and C. quoyi d’Orbigny. The strongly biconvex forms are usually heavily pustulate and very hispid, but flatter specimens with prominent chambers in the last whorl have reduced ornament, what pustules there are being confined to the umbilical region. In comparison, Calcarina mayori Cushman has a less robust test with well-developed spines, while C. rustica Todd & Post has grooved spines. Nevertheless, it seems to us that much specific differentiation within this genus is more than usually arbitrary. Insufficient studies have yet been made on the internal structure and variation in external morphology of the test. In particular, we know little about how much spine development is affected by the environment. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Okinawa (C. spengleri of Le Roy 1964). Recent: Widespread in the western Pacific from Japan to Queensland, Australia. Found also around India. Family ELPHIDIIDAE Galloway, 1933 Subfamily ELPHIDIINAE Galloway, 1933 Genus ELPHIDIUM de Montfort, 1808 Type-species: Nautilus macellus Fichtel & Moll var. B Fichtel & Moll, 1798. Elphidium cf. fax barbarense Nicol Pl. 6, figs 14a, b cf. 1944 Elphidium fax barbarense Nicol: 178; pl. 29, figs 10, 12. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9449, 9452. 82 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-63-1-60 mm, thickness 0-33-0-38 mm. Plug diameter 0-18- 0:35 mm. Number of chambers in last whorl 25-31. REMARKS. Our specimens are characterized by a large number of retral bars per chamber and sutures which become strongly limbate towards the umbilicus; the plug usually has a central depression but is non-canaliculate. In apertural view the test is keeled with angular peripheries, while the aperture is a series of interiomarginal pores at the base of the face, with areal pores on older chamber faces. The Togopi specimens seem closest to Elphidium fax barbarense of Nicol (1944), a subspecies first described from the Pleistocene of California, but differ in having a poreless plug and sutures which are limbate only at their umbilical ends. Furthermore, a number of different Indo-Pacific forms appear to have been included in Nicol’s subspecies and there has been some confusion with E. crispum (Linné). DISTRIBUTION. E. fax barbarense auctt. has been reported from Pliocene (Asano 1950) to Recent sediments in the Indo—west Pacific region. Genus CELLANTHUS de Montfort, 1808 Type-species: Nautilus craticulatus Fichtel & Moll, 1798. Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll) Pl. 7, figs 1, 2a, b; Pl. 10, figs 15, 16 1798 Nautilus craticulatus Fichtel & Moll: 51; pl. 5, figs h, i, k. 1862 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll) Carpenter : 279; pl. 16, figs 1-3, 7-9. 1884 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll); Brady : 739; pl. 110, figs 16, 17a, b. 1893 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll); Egger : 241; pl. 20, figs 24, 25. 1911 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll); Schubert : 91, text-fig. 11. 1914 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll); Cushman : 34; pl. 19, figs 4a, b. 1927 Polystomella craticulata (Fichtel & Moll); Hofker : 56; pl. 26, figs 10-15; pl. 27, figs 1-4; pl. 28, figs 4, 8, 10, 11. 1941a Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll) Le Roy: 78; pl. 6, figs 34, 35. 1944 Elphidium aff. craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Le Roy : 24; pl. 8, figs 36, 37. 1950 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Asano: 7, text-figs 36, 37. 1954 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Kleinpell : 42; pl. 2, fig. 4. 1958 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Ganapati & Satyavati : 125 (list); pl. 3, figs 87, 88. 1959 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Graham & Militante : 74; pl. 11, figs 9-12b. 1960 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Barker : 228; pl. 110, figs 16, 17a, b (after Brady). 1961 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Braga: 127; pl. 13, figs 4, 5. 1963 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Huang: pl. 2, fig. 47. 1964 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Rocha & Ubaldo: 147; pl. 18, fig. 5. 1964a Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Rocha & Ubaldo : 416; pl. 3, fig. 7. 1965 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Rocha : 420; pl. 5, fig. 3. 1965 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Jell, Maxwell & McKellar : 278; pl. 44, figs 7a, b. 1968 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Antony : 61; pl. 4, fig. 3. 1968 Elphidium craticulatum (Fichtel & Moll); Albani: 111; pl. 9, figs 19, 20. 1968 Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll) Chiji & Lopez: 105; pl. 13, fig. 9. 1971 Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll); Hofker : 171; pl. 101, figs 11-14; pl. 107, figs 1, 2, 7. MATERIAL. 55 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric Maximum diameter 1:15-4:50 mm 0:32-1:45 mm Thickness 0:50-1:60 mm 0:32-0:85 mm Plug diameter 0-50-3-20 mm 0-23-0-70 mm Number of chambers in final whorl 31-60 25-28 REMARKS. A Cellanthus with large caniculate plug, spiral canal, double septa and diverging canals opening into a double row of pores along the sutures; see Hofker (1927, 1971) for internal mor- phological details. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 83 Sexual dimorphism in the adult is pronounced, the large lenticular microspheric specimens, one of few fossil records of this dimorph, having a huge plug obscuring most of the test. In juvenile forms, however, sexual dimorphism can only be recognized in thin sections. Elphidium javanum Yabe & Asano (1937 : 102; pl. 18, figs 10a, b), from the Miocene of western Java, and E. taiwanum Nakamura (1937: 193; pl. 11, figs 9a, b), from the Neogene of Taiwan, may prove to be conspecific with Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll). Furthermore, E. batavum Hofker (1968 : 32; pl. 11, figs 8-19), from the Recent sediments of the Bay of Jakarta, Java, has doubtful validity. In 1968 Hofker stated that his new species was a true Elphidium, not a Cellanthus, forming a link between E. crispum and C. craticulatus, and cited Cushman’s E. craticulatum from Tonga (1933: 48; pl. 11, fig. 5), as being conspecific. In 1971, however, he included this reference, without comment, in his synonymy of C. craticulatus. DisTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of the Bismarck Archipelago (Schubert 1911), western Java (Le Roy 1944) and Fiji (Kleinpell 1954); Late Tertiary (? Pliocene) of Siberoet Island, Indonesia (Le Roy 1941a); Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1950) and Taiwan (Huang 1963) and a sub-Recent raised beach in Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: A widely distributed shallow-water species in the western Pacific, from Japan to Australia, and Indian Oceans — the east coast of Africa, Arabian Gulf (type locality) and Indian coasts. Cellanthus adelaidensis (Howchin & Parr) Pl. 6, figs 13a, b; Pl. 10, figs 18, 19 1938 Elphidium adelaidense Howchin & Parr : 300; pl. 18, fig. 7; pl. 19, figs 5, 6. 1938 Elphidium sp. cf. adelaidense Howchin & Parr : 308; pl. 17, fig. 3. 1975 Elphidium sp. 14 Billman & Kartaadipura : 306; pl. 1, fig. 6. MATERIAL. 41 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric Megalospheric (1 specimen) Maximum diameter 2:55 mm 0:70-2:20 mm Thickness 1:05 mm 0:18-0:90 mm Number of whorls 73 1-5 Number of chambers in first whorl 5 8-10 Number of chambers in second whorl 10 21-24 Number of chambers in third whorl 13 31-34 Number of chambers in final whorl 50 13-41 Proloculus internal diameter i 0:15-0:32 mm REMARKS. These specimens generally have only lightly developed bars covering the retral pro- cesses, and the very low chambers have their sutures so close together that double rows of pores of the sutural canal give the impression that the shell is highly perforate (see PI. 6, fig. 13). There is no external difference between the two generations and only one microspheric form has been found. The septa in this species are double, their canal opening into the subsutural canal which branches near the surface to give biperforate sutural pores. The umbilical canals seldom anasto- mose and some appear to arise from a poorly-developed spiral canal. The plug is poorly developed for E. adelaidense but as other morphological details are very similar, we consider that the Togopi specimens are conspecific. Elphidium rotatum Howchin & Parr (1938 : 299; pl. 17, figs 1, 2, 4), a much compressed form, recorded from the Pliocene to Recent of Australia, appears to be the only other species in the Indo-Pacific similar in size and external morphology to our material. DIsTRIBUTION. Cellanthus adelaidensis does not appear to have been found later than the Pliocene. Howchin & Parr (1938) record it from the Miocene and Upper Pliocene of South Australia, while Billman & Kartaadipura (1975 : 306) state that in east Kalimantan, Borneo, their Elphidium sp. 14 ‘has it highest stratigraphical occurrence in the Asanoina Zone’, which they interpret as Pliocene. 84 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Cellanthus biperforatus sp. nov. Fig. 61; Pl. 7, figs 3a, b; Pl. 10, fig. 21 DiAGnosis. A rotund Cellanthus with a large canaliculate plug. Sutures straight to gently curved, bearing on either side a row of sutural pits. NAME. From the two rows of sutural pits, one on each side of the suture. HoLotyPe. BM(NH) reg. no. P50160, from NB 9452. MATERIAL. 90 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9452, 9454, 9456/7, 9460. Fig. 61 Cellanthus biperforatus sp. nov. P50160. Side view of holotype showing position of chamber sutures (see also Pl. 7, figs 3a, b). Sample NB 9452. x 40. DESCRIPTION (Holotype). Test calcareous, perforate, biconvex and plugged. Plug raised, trans- lucent, occupying a third of the test diameter and perforated by many canals. Periphery round in side view. Last whorl involute, made up of 24 non-lobate chambers with sutures which are radial to gently curved (slightly depressed in later chambers) and lined on each side by a row of pits containing the surface pores of the subsutural canal system. On the later-formed sutures the anterior pores are larger than the posterior row, but for the most part are of the same size. Test inflated in apertural view, peripheries subrounded. Apertural face low, aperture a row of 13 interiomarginal pores separated from each other by bars of secondary shell material which are developed on earlier whorls and extend in a subdued manner onto the first few chambers of the last whorl. DIMENSIONS (Holotype). Maximum diameter 1-06 mm, thickness 0-65 mm, diameter of plug 0:45 mm. VARIATION. Size range of paratypes: maximum diameter 0-32-1-40 mm, thickness 0-30-1-05 mm, plug diameter 0-40-1-15 mm. Externally the two generations are not distinguishable. From sectioned megalospheric specimens the following chamber counts were made: Chambers in first whorl 6-14 Chambers in second whor! 8-23 Chambers in third whorl 13-32 Chambers in last whorl 24-42 A maximum of six whorls has been counted in this species. REMARKS. Our specimens superficially resemble the Neogene species Elphidium taiwanum Naka- mura (1937 : 139; pl. 11, figs 9a, b) and E. javanum Yabe & Asano (1937: 102; pl. 18, figs 10a, b), but differ in possessing on each side of the suture a row of sutural pits, each containing a pore which forms the surface extremity of the subsutural canal system. In the last two species, which are similar to Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll) except for their subdued retral ornament, the bifurcating subsutural canal reaches the surface of the test as pores in a single row of elongate sutural pits. The very thin double septum, double sutural pores and large perforate plug are typical of Cellanthus. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 85 Cellanthus hailei sp. nov. Pl. 6, figs 9a, b; Pl. 10, fig. 22 Diacnosis. An inflated Cel/anthus with rounded peripheries, low apertural face and apparently poreless plug. Ornament of many retral bars per suture; those at the beginning of the final whorl anastomosing to give coarse striae. Name. In honour of Professor N. S. Haile, formerly of the Geological Survey of Malaysia, who collected the material described in this paper. Ho.LotyPe. BM(NH) reg. no. P50152, from NB 9452. MATERIAL. 30 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9452, 9453, 9460. DESCRIPTION (Holotype). Test round in outline, involute, margin entire; inflated and subovate in edge view, peripheries subrounded. There are 36 chambers in the final whorl with 10 retral bars per suture on each side on the first, and 21 on the last chamber of the whorl. The retral bars tend to branch and anastomose at the beginning of the final whorl to give crude striae, but are distinctly separate from the next row of bars after about 10 chambers. Sutures gently curved and slightly limbate later. Umbilical plug distinct and raised but feebly dissected; one or two pits are present but there seem to be no true pores. Apertural face low, aperture indistinct, probably a series of interiomarginal pores. DIMENSIONS (Holotype). Maximum diameter 1-40 mm, thickness 0-84 mm. Height of apertural face 0:09 mm. Diameter of plug 0-40 mm. VARIATION. Size range of paratypes: diameter 0-40-1-50 mm, thickness 0:70-1:05 mm. Diameter of plug 0-18-0-45 mm. The number of retral bars per suture on each side of the test varies from 6 to 20, the number of whorls from 3 to 6 and the number of chambers per whorl as seen in section is as follows: Microspheric Megalospheric First whorl 7 10-14 Second whorl 10-11 23-27 Last whorl 28-34 25—40 The internal proloculus diameter is 0-01 mm in the microspheric form and between 0-13 and 0:22 mm in the megalospheric. REMARKS. In both generations, determinable only in thin section, the coiling is tight with little increase in the chamber width throughout. The septa are double and carry a broad canal which opens as a rectangular single pore at the surface. This canal system does not penetrate the wedge- shaped plug, which is composed of numerous laminated layers and causes offlap of the newly formed chambers (see PI. 10, fig. 22). The presence of a double septum places our new species in Cellanthus, but the apparent absence of umbilical canals and double sutural pores is inconsistent with the classification (Loeblich & Tappan 1964) used here. The aperture, often seen best in vertical thin sections, is a single row of large interiomarginal pores. Cellanthus hailei sp. nov. has the striate ornamentation of the early chambers of the final whorl so characteristic of the Elphidium indicum|hispidulum group, together with the general test mor- phology of Cellanthus craticulatus to which it is most closely related. It differs from C. crati- culatus (and E. batavum Hofker), however, in possessing a non-perforate plug and a partially Striate test; furthermore, it does not have a keel. Genus CRIBROELPHIDIUM Cushman & Brénnimann, 1948 Type-species: Cribroelphidium vadescens Cushman & Brénnimann, 1948. Cribroelphidium dentense sp. nov. Pl. 7, figs 4a, b 86 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON DiAGnosis. A robust Cribroelphidium with inflated later chambers and keeled only in the earlier part of the last whorl. Pustulose septal pits strongly developed and elongate in later part of test; up to 14 septal bars per suture on each side. Apertural face very broad. NAmeE. Described from the Dent Peninsula, Sabah. Ho.otyre. BM(NH) reg. no. P50161, from NB 9452. MATERIAL. 64 specimens. NB 9452. DESCRIPTION (Holotype). Test involute, perforate, periphery in side view smoothly curved in early part of final whorl, becoming slightly lobate later. Chambers, 11 in number, only gradually increasing in size; early chambers keeled, later ones unkeeled and moderately inflated. Sutures curved, depressed and crossed by strong bars of shell material which in the later chambers do not completely bridge the sutures; between the bars are septal pits (fossettes), the floors of which are finely pustulate. Umbilical region slightly depressed with a faintly rugose plug associated in the earlier portion of the final whorl with the thickened umbilical ends of the chambers. In apertural view the test is moderately compressed, the periphery of the earlier part of the final whorl being subrounded, that of the apertural face broadly rounded. Apertural face convex, almost as high as wide, with distinct basal interiomarginal pores separated by bars; small areal pores surrounded by pustules are also present. DIMENSIONS (Holotype). Maximum diameter 0-50 mm, thickness at centre 0-21 mm. Height of apertural face 0-21 mm, width 0-28 mm. VARIATION. Size range of paratypes: maximum diameter 0-33-0-70 mm, thickness across last chamber 0:33-0:70 mm, thickness across umbilicus 0:15-0:35 mm. The number of chambers in the first whorl varies between 6 and 9, those in the last whorl between 10 and 11. Since the initial part of the coil is tight there is no way of distinguishing the two generations externally. REMARKS. Closely related to the Elphidium articulatum/excavatum group, but differs in its less lobate periphery, partial development of a keel, more numerous fossettes, more inflated test and much wider apertural face. The new species also resembles in side view Elphidium kusiroense Asano from the Pleistocene of Japan (Asano 1938 : 590; pl. 14, fig. 2), but in apertural view is markedly different — the latter is very compressed and does not have a keel on the early part of the final whorl. Because of the absence of a well-defined canal system, presence of sutural bars, single septa and both interiomarginal and areal pores on the apertural face, the species is placed in Cribro- elphidium. Genus CRIBRONONION Thalmann, 1947 Type-species: Nonionina heteropora Egger, 1857. Cribrononion reticulosus (Cushman) Pl. 6, fig. 12 1933 Elphidium reticulosum Cushman : 51; pl. 12, figs 5a, b. 1939 Elphidium reticulosum Cushman; Cushman : 59; pl. 16, figs 24a, b. 21957 Elphidium hyalocostatum Todd : 300; pl. 88, figs 19a, b. 1969 Elphidium sp. A cf. E. milletti (Heron-Allen & Earland); Betjeman : 130; pl. 18, figs 8, 9. 1970 Elphidium reticulosum Cushman; Matoba : 52; pl. 6, figs 12a, b. 21970 Elphidium cf. reticulosum Cushman; Matoba : 52; pl. 6, figs 13a, b. MATERIAL. 70 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9454. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-30-0-58 mm, maximum thickness 0:15-0:23 mm. Number of chambers in first whorl 7-9, in second 8-13 and in final whorl 9-12. REMARKS. A tightly coiled, somewhat compressed species with retral bars strongly developed on the earlier chambers, the final chambers being covered with ‘a fine network of irregular pattern’ FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 87 as described by Cushman (1933: 51). The plug area consists of plates (or layers) of crystalline material; no canals are visible. The later chambers of a number of specimens in the Togopi samples have a tendency to become strongly inflated as in the type-figure, but our illustrated specimen (PI. 6, fig. 12) is more usual. Internally there are no diverging canals emanating from the intraseptal subsutural canal system. The aperture on the final chamber is a series of pores at the base of the apertural face; on earlier chambers it appears as an interiomarginal slit. These characters signify Cribrononion. Forms very close to Elphidium hyalocostatum Todd occur in our samples and these would seem to be no more than a variety of E. reticulosum with stronger and more aligned ornamentation on the final chambers. We have examined the types of E. milletti (Heron-Allen & Earland) and note that they include specimens distinct from Cushman’s species. The characteristic chevron ornament is particularly well developed on later chambers, and the periphery is strongly lobate when seen in side view (see Heron-Allen & Earland 1915: 735; pl. 53, figs 38-42). Murray’s E. reticulosum from the Persian Gulf (1970: fig. 9C) would appear to belong to E. milletti. DISTRIBUTION. Previously found only in the Recent of Japan (Matoba 1970), Saipan (Todd 1957), Tonga (Cushman 1933, 1939) and Western Australia (Betjeman 1969). Cribrononion tikutoensis (Nakamura) Pl. 6, figs 10a, b 1937 Elphidium tikutoensis Nakamura : 139; pl. 11, figs 10a, b. 1962 Elphidium tikutoensis Nakamura; Huang: 194; pl. 1, figs 1, 4b. 21967 Cellanthus tungliangensis Huang : 137; pl. 1, figs 1a, b; pl. 2, figs 2a, b. 1968 Cellanthus tikutoensis (Nakamura) Huang: 88; pl. 4, fig. 1. MATERIAL. 54 specimens. NB 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:32-0:62 mm, thickness 0:18-0:25 mm. Number of chambers in first, second and final whorls 6-8, 9-12 and 11-15, respectively. Internal proloculus diameter 0-03-0-04 mm. REMARKS. The umbilical region of our specimens is usually surrounded by enlarged sutural pores and the plug is variously developed, sometimes covered by secondary granulate shell material and often so reduced that the test appears evolute. The presence of interiomarginal pores and the simple canal system place it in Cribrononion. Nakamura’s type-figure shows, however, a narrow interiomarginal slit-like aperture, a feature which is not commented on in either of Huang’s redescriptions of the types (1962, 1967). Cellanthus tungliangensis Huang, from the Plio-Pleisto- cene of Penghu Island, off Taiwan, seems to differ very little from E. tikutoensis Nakamura; it certainly has small pores at the base of the apertural face and could well be conspecific. DISTRIBUTION. Previously known only from the Neogene of Taiwan. Genus ELPHIDIELLA Cushman, 1936 Type-species: Polystomella arctica Parker & Jones in Brady, 1864. Elphidiella indopacifica Germeraad Pl. 7, figs 5-7; Pl. 10, fig. 20 1946 Elphidiella indopacifica Germeraad : 67; pl. 3, figs 3, 4. MATERIAL. 205 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9450, 9452, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-41-1-45 mm, thickness 0:20-0:80 mm. Number of chambers in first whorl 7-9, in second 9-12 and in last whorl 9-26. REMARKS. ‘Differs from all known Elphidiellas by the large number of chambers’ writes Ger- meraad (1946) in his description of this distinctive species, which surprisingly does not appear to have been recorded since. Our larger specimens, few in number and microspheric (PI. 7, fig. 5), agree closely with his figures both in side and apertural view. 88 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Most of our specimens, however, are much smaller (diameter less than 0-85 mm) and those sectioned proved to be megalospheric. These tests (Pl. 7, figs 6, 7) are robust and stout, but their peripheries are more acute and the number of chambers in the final whorl never exceeds thirteen. They nevertheless show the characteristic double row of alternating pits at each suture (the anterior set is the longest) and are thus conspecific. Germeraad had only two specimens and described only the microspheric form. Because of the double row of sutural pores, interioareal multiple apertures and lack of retral processes the species is retained in Elphidiella despite the absence of a well-developed canal system. DIsTRIBUTION. Germeraad (1946) recorded E. indopacifica from the Recent of the Island of Ceram, Indonesia. Subfamily FAUJASININAE Bermidez, 1953 Genus PARRELLINA Thalmann, 1951 Type-species: Polystomella imperatrix Brady, 1881. Parrellina hispidula (Cushman) Pl. 6, fig. 11 1936 Elphidium hispidulum Cushman : 83; pl. 14, figs 13a, b. 1968 Elphidium hispidulum Cushman; Chiji & Lopez: 106; pl. 13, fig. 3. 1968 Elphidium hispidulum Cushman; Chiji : 62; pl. 3, fig. 12. 1968 Parrellina hispidula (Cushman) Hofker : 31; pl. 11, figs 1-7. MATERIAL. 30 specimens. NB 9446, 9447, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:30-0:65 mm, thickness 0:17-0:33 mm. Number of chambers in first, second and final whorl, 6-7, 10-12 and 9-15 respectively. REMARKS. These specimens fall within the E. hispidulum/indicum group and differ from E. reti- culosum Cushman in being inflated, plugged, hispid and non-reticulate. Elphidium hokkaidoense Asano (1950: 8, text-figs 44, 45) from the Pliocene of Japan is probably synonymous as it is said to differ from E. indicum Cushman in ‘having weak costae nearly parallel to the periphery of earlier chambers’, a feature also common to E. hispidulum. E. indicum has a large raised plug while E. hispidulum and E. hokkaidoense do not. There are no true retral processes present in our specimens and in thin section the septal canal can be seen to branch within the spiral septa forming connections with more than one of the large pores traversing the wall. This type of canal system is typical of Parrellina (see Hofker 1968 : 31). DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pleistocene of Japan (Chiji 1968). This range would possibly be extended back into the Pliocene if E. hokkaidoense Asano proved to be conspecific. Recent: Australia (Cushman 1936), Java (Hofker 1968) and Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968). Family NUMMULITIDAE de Blainville, 1825 Subfamily NUMMULITINAE de Blainville, 1825 Genus NUMMULITES Lamarck, 1801 Type-species: Camerina laevigata Bruguiére, 1792. Barnett (1974), after studying 58 species of the Nummulitidae including Nummulites willcoxi Heilprin, the type-species of Operculinoides Hanzawa, concluded that Operculinoides is a super- fluous generic name and that Assilina, Operculina and Operculinella are distinct from Nummulites. Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole) Pl. 9, figs 6-9; Pl. 10, fig. 26 cf. 1954 Operculinoides amplicuneata Cole : 573; pl. 204, figs 7, 9, 17, 18. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 89 MATERIAL. Over 270 specimens. NB 9452. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 1-9-3-7 mm, thickness 0-9-1-6 mm. Internal proloculus diameter 0:10-0:20 mm. Number of whorls 3-43. Number of chambers in first, second and third whorls 6-7, 11-15 and 18-21 respectively. REMARKS. Only the involute and tightly coiled megalospheric generation is present. It has an acute edge, strong marginal cord and radiate or sinuous, flush sutures. Pustules are rarely present be- tween sutures. Although our specimens closely resemble Nummulites amplicuneatus (Cole), other externally similar species are N. bikiniensis (Cole) and N. rectilatus (Cole), from the Upper Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene respectively of Bikini Atoll, though neither of these has an acute peripheral margin. DISTRIBUTION. N. amplicuneatus was recorded by Cole (1954) from the uppermost Miocene of Bikini Atoll, west Pacific. Nummulites tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole) Pl. 9, figs 13-16; Pl. 10, fig. 25 1941 Operculinoides tamanensis Vaughan & Cole : 43; pl. 10, figs 9, 10; pl. 11, figs 8-10; pl. 12, figs 1-3. MATERIAL. 128 specimens. NB 9452. VARIATION. Diameter 2-9 mm (megalospheric form 2-5-5 mm). Thickness not exceeding 1 mm. Internal proloculus diameter: microspheric form 0-03-0-15 mm, megalospheric 0:12-0:22 mm. Number of chambers in the first whorl: 7-8 (microspheric), 5—6 (megalospheric); second whorl: 10-12 (microspheric), 10-15 (megalospheric). REMARKS. The present specimens are complanate to lenticular in shape, the umbo usually being more prominent on one surface than the other; the slowly unwinding coil has not been observed to flare in the microspheric form. Thin sections demonstrate the presence of trabeculae-like structures, which externally can be seen only faintly in the chamber walls of complete specimens but which have been shown by scanning electron microscopy of fractured specimens to be solid and to occupy the whole thickness of the wall. These ‘trabeculae’, which run anteriorly, normal to the septum, and have been observed to branch and even become arborescent (PI. 10, fig. 25), are certainly present from the third chamber onwards and may occur back to the proloculus. Our material has been compared directly with the types of Operculinoides tamanensis Vaughan & Cole (USNM nos 545879, 5461547), the only observable difference being that the proloculus in the American specimens is smaller, having an internal diameter of 0:08-0:09 mm. We know of no other post-Oligocene species of Nummulites from the Indo—west Pacific region which shows these characteristic ‘trabeculae’, the function of which is unknown. DIsTRIBUTION. Originally described from the Lower Miocene of Trinidad; it does not appear to have been recorded subsequently. Genus OPERCULIN4? d@’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Lenticulites complanatus Defrance, 1822. Van der Vlerk & Bannink (1969) suggested that the relative ages of deposits containing Operculina could be determined by calculating the value of ‘factor E’, this being a measure of the extent to which the second chamber is enclosed by the third 1 angle e 2 100). angle e? * See comments on Nummiulites, p. 88. 90 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON They observed a significant decrease in the grade of enclosure in specimens from rocks of Eocene age through to those living today and plotted the rate of change of ‘factor E’ on a graph (see van der Vierk & Bannink 1969: fig. 3). Operculina ammonoides (Schr6ter) and O. bartschi Cushman from the Togopi Formation have been used to test this hypothesis. Our two nummulitids, Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole) and N. tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole), were also measured although we are aware that ‘factor E’ might not be applicable to them since van der Vlerk & Bannink studied only Operculina. Twenty good thin sections of each species, all from sample NB 9452, were measured using the prescribed method, the angles e! and e? being measured separately by both of us and the arithmetic mean calculated. Fig. 62 shows the percentage distribution of ‘factor E’ expressed in histograms (compare with van der Vlerk & Bannink 1969: fig. 2) and the calculated mean values for the four species. It can be seen that O. bartschi and N. tamanensis give very different and much lower results than O. ammonoides and N. cf. amplicuneatus, which although producing almost identical means, have contrasting histogram patterns. Measurements were also made of three other species of known age and plotted (Fig. 63) together with the four Togopi species. Operculina heberti Munier-Chalmas (12 specimens) from Operculina ammonoides (mean 422) Operculina bartschi (mean 340) Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus >~ Vv (= o 2 io” o = = be (mean 430) Nummulites tamanensis (mean 250) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 factor E Fig. 62 Left: Percentage distribution of factor E in four species of Operculina and Nummulites, sample NB 9452, Togopi Formation. Twenty thin sections were measured in each case. Right: Method of measuring factor E from thin sections of megalospheric forms (after van der Vlerk & Bannink 1969). The degree of enclosure of chamber II by chamber III is shown for a typical member of each species to the left of this. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 91 the Palaeocene of France gave an ‘Oligocene’ date, an Operculinella (10 specimens) from the Middle Miocene part of the Sebahat Formation (see p. 5) gave a fairly accurate result, while 11 Recent specimens of Operculina ammonoides (SchrGter) in the Heron-Allen & Earland Collection, from Singapore Roads, produced a result slightly higher than that of van der Vlerk & Bannink’s Recent species (Fig. 63). The Togopi specimens of O. ammonoides and N. cf. amplicuneatus both Operculina ammonoides * Nummulites cf. omplicuneatus =~ * Operculina ammonoides Fees | MIOCENE Operculina bartschi Operculinella sp. a Operculina heberti % Recent, Singapore Roads * Togopi Formation yx Md. Miocene Sebahat Fmn., Sabah @3 Lr.Paleocene, Latone, SW France g Plot of van der Vierk & Bannink, 1969 OLIGOCENE + Nummulites tamanensis EOCENE Fig. 63 The mean values of factor E for the four species of Operculina and Nummulites, together with those of three comparative species of known age, plotted on van der Vlerk & Bannink’s (1969) graph of the rate of evolution of factor E but with time scale modified after Eysinga (1975). (Compare with fig. 3 of van der Vlerk & Bannink 1969.) indicated an Upper Pliocene age; unfortunately O. bartschi gave an early Miocene date while N. tamanensis suggested a late Eocene age. This exercise did not, therefore, confirm the stratigraphical value of ‘factor E’ and further work is obviously necessary. It may be that the rate of evolution varies from one lineage to another, and in this connection it is noteworthy that the two tightly coiled Togopi nummulitids, although belonging to different genera, apparently produced a reliable date while the species with flaring coils did not. Unfortunately van der Vlerk & Bannink did not identify the species in their study. 92 1781 1783 1860 1893 1921 1921 1924 1925 1933 1935 1938 1939 1946 1948 1949 1954 1959 1959 1960 1960 1960 1961 1961 1964 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Operculina ammonoides (Schroter) Pl. 9, figs 1-5; Pl. 10, figs 23, 27 Nautilus ammonoides Gronovius : 282; pl. 19, figs 5, 6. Nautilus ammonoides Schroter : 21. Operculina sp. Carpenter : 12; pl. 3, figs 1, 2. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius) Egger : 242; pl. 20, figs 38, 39. Operculina discoidalis (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 379 (see Cole 1961 : pl. 14, fig. 1). Operculina granulosa Leymerie; Cushman : 381 (see Cole 1961 : pl. 14, fig. 23). Operculina gaimardi d’Orbigny ; Cushman : 50; pl. 17, fig. 4. Operculina (Operculinella) venosa (Fichtel & Moll); Yabe & Hanzawa: 49; pl. 5, figs 5-9, 19-27 only. Operculina granulosa Leymerie (?); Cushman : 56; pl. 14, figs 1-7b; pl. 15, figs 3-6 only; pl. 16, figs 1-3. Operculinella venosa (Fichtel & Moll); Hanzawa : 23; pl. 1, figs 31, 32, 34 only. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Chapman & Parr : 290; pl. 17, figs 12-16; text-fig. 1, no. 5. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Hanzawa : 229; pl. 15, figs 1a—2b only. Operculinella venosa (Fichtel & Moll); Abrard: 12; pl. 1, figs 5-6. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Bannink : 81; pl. 5, figs 30, 31, 34-37; pl. 7, figs 46-48, 52, 53; pl. 8, figs 55, 56; pl. 11, figs 96-98; pl. 12, figs 99-101; pl. 13, figs 115-120; pl. 15, figs 133-142; pl. 17, figs 155-157, 164, 165; pl. 18, figs 168-170; pl. 19, figs 177-183. Operculina gaimardi d’Orbigny; Said : 14; pl. 2, fig. 37. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Cushman, Todd & Post : 346; pl. 87, fig. 1. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Cole : 356; pl. 28, figs 4-10; pl. 29, figs 3-15; pl. 30, figs 2-6, 8 only; pl. 31, figs 5-7. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Graham & Militante : 76; pl. 12, figs 1, 2. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Smout & Eames: 110 (see Cole 1959: pl. 29, figs 3, 7, 12; pl. 31, figs 5-7). Operculina hanzawai Smout & Eames : 110 (see Cole 1959: pi. 29, fig. 9). Operculinella venosa (Fichtel & Moll); Smout & Eames : 111 (see Cole 1959: pl. 28, figs 8, 9; pl. 29, figs 6, 8, 10; pl. 30, figs 2, 6, 8). Camerina ammonoides (Gronovius) Cole: 118; pl. 14, figs 1-17, 20, 22-24 only; pl. 15, figs 2-6, 11 only. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Huang : 86; pl. 3, figs 22, 23. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Rocha & Ubaldo: 156; pl. 19, fig. 13. MATERIAL. Over 220 specimens. NB 9447, 9449, 9450, 9452, 9453, 9454, 9460. VARIATION. Microspheric forms — Megalospheric forms Maximum diameter 3-5 mm 0-6-3 mm Thickness up to 0-72 mm 0-25-0-65 mm Internal proloculus diameter 0:02-0:03 mm 0:05-0:11 mm Number of chambers in first whorl 5-7 6-8 Number of chambers in second whorl 10-12 9-13 Plate 9 Light microscopy, magnifications approximate Figs 1-5 Operculina ammonoides (Schroter). Figs 1, 5, P50194, P50198. Megalospheric forms, external views. Fig. 4, P50197. Megalospheric form, horizontally split specimen. Fig. 2, P50195. Microspheric form, horizontally split specimen. Fig. 3, P50196. Microspheric form, external view. All from sample NB 9452. x 15. Figs 6-9 Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole). Megalospheric forms. Figs 6, 7. P50199, P50200. Horizontally split specimen and external view of test. Figs 8, 9. P50201, P50202. Block half- sections (vertical). All from sample NB 9452. x 10. Figs 10-12 Operculina bartschi Cushman. External views. Fig. 10, P50203. Microspheric form. Figs 11, 12, P50204, P50205. ? Megalospheric forms. All from sample NB 9452. x 6. Figs 13-16 Nummulites tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole). Figs 13, 14, P50206, P50207. Megalospheric forms; external view of test and horizontally split specimen. In Fig. 13 the ‘trabeculae’ charac- teristic of this species can just be seen externally, running normal to the later-formed sutures. Figs 15, 16, P50208. Microspheric form; external view of one half of test and internal view of other half, horizontally split. All from sample NB 9452. x 6. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 94 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON REMARKS. This species was first described and figured by Gronovius (1781), but following Hemming (1954 : 283) the diagnosis of Nautilus ammonoides given by Schréter in 1783 is now taken as the first valid description, Gronovius’ rather poorly illustrated specimens being the types. The inadequate description and illustrations have caused much confusion, and for many years Hyalinea balthica (Schréter) was regarded as O. ammonoides. Chapman & Parr (1938), Carter (1953), Smout & Eames (1960) and Cole (1959, 1961) all redefined the species, but there still remains great difficulty in setting a limit on intraspecific variation, which is doubtless governed by ecological factors. Cole and Smout & Eames disagree on whether there is a continuous variation between evolute and involute tests and on what constitutes Operculinella venosa (Fichtel & Moll). However, as these protagonists agree with Chapman & Parr’s (1938) redefinition, we base our identification of Operculina ammonoides primarily on the latter’s diagnosis. The numerous specimens in Togopi sample NB 9452 show gradation from thin, almost evolute tests (supposedly mature) with a strong marginal cord, to thick, nearly involute immature tests, but never to completely involute ‘Operculinella venosa’-like forms. The megalospheric generation remains close-coiled but the microspheric has a flared last whorl (see PI. 9). Both generations have a coarsely pustulate umbilical area with a large central umbonal pustule. In the final whorl, coarse beading commonly occurs on chambers or sutures, or both, being occasionally restricted to the chambers only, or to the early sutures. The morphotypes represented by the following have not been seen in our material and are not, therefore, included in our synonymy, although regarded by some authors as synonymous with O. ammonoides. Operculinella venosa (Fichtel & Moll); Cushman 1924. ? Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Carter 1953: pl. 34, figs 4-6. Operculina elegans Cushman 1921 : pl. 97, fig. 3. Operculina discoidalis (d’Orbigny) var. involuta Cushman, 1921. Nummulina discoidalis d’Orbigny, 1826. Assilina nitida d’Orbigny, 1826. Operculina gaymardi d@’Orbigny, 1826. Operculina gaimardi d’Orbigny; Cushman 1933: pl. 13, figs 1-5. Operculina philippinensis Cushman; Yabe & Hanzawa 1930: pl. 12, fig. 9. Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius); Chiji & Lopez 1968: pl. 13, fig. 10. Operculina sp. Puri 1957: pl. 13, figs 1-14. Operculinoides sp. Puri 1957: pl. 13, figs 5-8. Those specimens renamed by Barker (1960 : pl. 112) as Operculina ammonoides from Brady (1884). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene (Tf) of Borneo (Cole 1959); Neogene of Okinawa and Taiwan (Hanzawa 1935); post-Pliocene of Okinawa (Yabe & Hanzawa 1925, Cole 1959); ? Pleistocene of the Ryukyus (Cole 1959); Quaternary of the New Hebrides (Abrard 1946) and Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Bannink (1948) records this species from numerous borings in Indonesia of Mio- cene age and younger. Recent: Widespread in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. Operculina bartschi Cushman Pl. 9, figs 10-12; Pl. 10, fig. 24 1860 Operculina sp. Carpenter : 12; pl. 3, figs 6, 11, 12 only; pl. 4, figs 1-4, 6, 10, 11. 1901 Operculina sp. Yoshiwara: pl. 1, figs 1, 2. 1921 Operculina bartschi Cushman : 376, text-fig. 13. 1925 Operculina bartschi Cushman var. punctata Yabe & Hanzawa : 52; pl. 6, figs 13-15; pl. 7, figs 13-18. 1925 Operculina bartschi Cushman; Yabe & Hanzawa: 52; pl. 6, figs 6-12; pl. 7, figs 11, 12. 1935 Operculina bartschi Cushman; Hanzawa : 22; pl. 2, figs 1-12. 1938 Operculina bartschi Cushman; Chapman & Parr : 292; pl. 17, figs 17, 18 only; text-fig. 6. 1946 Operculina bartschi Cushman; Abrard : 99; pl. 1, figs 3, 4. 1959 Operculina bartschi Cushman; Cole : 360; pl. 28, fig. 16. MATERIAL. Over 260 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 95 VARIATION. Microspheric forms _Megalospheric forms Maximum diameter 3-9 mm 3-6 mm Thickness up to 1 mm up to 1 mm Proloculus (internal) diameter 0:02 mm 0:11-0:25 mm Number of chambers in first whorl 6-7 4-7 Number of chambers in second whorl 9-11 10-13 Number of chambers in third whorl 23-37 14-25 REMARKS. The chambers are high and narrow (sometimes malformed), arcuate and often sharply recurved at the periphery. The umbonal region is usually raised and invariably pustulate. Beading in both generations is heavy at the start of the last whorl, less so on later chambers; it may be light, arranged as a single row, in alternating rows or scattered over the surface; it is usually clearly separate from the sutural beads which may be isolated or fused to form bars. Smooth forms are rare. Cushman (1921) clearly states in his type-description that this species has granulate chamber walls and no sutural beading, but as the type came from a sample containing few specimens, variation in ornament is not discussed. In O. bartschi var. ornata Cushman (1921) the granules are absent, at least on the later chambers, and only the septa are beaded, while in O. bartschi var. punctata Yabe & Hanzawa there is beading between the chambers and apparently some on the septa. Hanzawa (1935 : 23) concluded that the varieties of O. bartschi probably intergrade, and after consulting Yabe withdrew their varietal name punctata, believing, correctly in our opinion, that their specimens were all conspecific with Cushman’s type. The affinities of the variety ornata, however, remain problematical as it is difficult to differentiate it externally from Operculina gaymardi d’Orbigny and O. complanata (Defrance), and for this reason it is excluded from our synonymy. For additional information on O. bartschi see Cole (1961 : 120). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene to Quaternary of the Ryukyu Islands (Yabe & Hanzawa 1925, Hanzawa 1935); Quaternary of the Ryukyus (Yoshiwara 1901) and the New Hebrides (Abrard 1946). Recent: Found in the tropical East Indies from the Philippines to Australia. Subfamily CYCLOCLYPEINAE Biitschli, 1880 Genus HETEROSTEGINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Heterostegina depressa Parker, Jones & Brady, 1865. Heterostegina sp. Pl. 8, figs 9, 10 MATERIAL. 6 specimens. NB 9452. VARIATION. Length c. 1:00-4:50 mm, width c. 1-00-4-00 mm, thickness c. 0:30-0:40 mm (lowest measurement on broken specimen). Proloculus (internal) diameter 0-08-0-11 mm. Number of chambers in first and second whorls respectively 44-5 and 94-12. Chamber number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Number of chamberlets: undivided 0-2 2-4 3-5 2-3 3-5 3-4 REMARKS. There is heavy beading on the chamber sutures with small beads running parallel to each suture down each chamber as in H. pusillumbonata Cole. The chamberlets of the neanic portion, however, are much longer than high, as in H. operculinoides Hofker. Family HANTKENINIDAE Cushman, 1927 Subfamily HASTIGERININAE Bolli, Loeblich & Tappan, 1957 Genus HASTIGERINA Thomson in Murray, 1876 Type-species: Hastigerina murrayi Thomson, 1876 (= Nonionina pelagica d’Orbigny, 1839). 96 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Hastigerina siphonifera (d’Orbigny) Pl. 8, fig. 17 1839 Globigerina siphonifera d’Orbigny : 83; pl. 4, figs 15-18. 1960 Hastigerina (Hastigerina) siphonifera (d’Orbigny) Banner & Blow: 22, text-figs 2a—c (lectotype), 3a, b. MATERIAL. | immature specimen. NB 9460. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0-26 mm, thickness 0:20 mm. RANGE. Recorded by Blow (1969) as Hastigerina (Hastigerina) siphonifera (d’Orbigny) with an age range of Middle Miocene to Recent (Zone N12—Zone N23). Family GLOBIGERINIDAE Carpenter, Parker & Jones, 1862 Subfamily GLOBIGERININAE d’Orbigny, 1826 Genus GLOBIGERINA d’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny, 1826. Plate 10 Thin sections by ordinary transmitted light Fig. 5 Pseudomassilina medioelata sp. nov. P50209. Vertical section. Paratype, sample NB 9452. x 50. Fig.2 Pseudomassilina australis (Cushman). P50210. Vertical section (final chamber broken). Sample NB 9452. x 50. Fig. 3 Asterorotalia inspinosa Huang. P50211. Vertical section. Sample NB 9450. x 60. Figs 4,5 Ammonia togopiensis sp. nov. Vertical sections. Fig. 1, P50212. Microspheric form (final chamber broken). Paratype, sample NB 9452. Fig. 5, P50213. Megalospheric form. Paratype, sample NB 9449. Both specimens x 25. Fig. 6 ‘Schackoinella’ globosa (Millett). P50214. Vertical section. Sample NB 9447. x 110. Figs 7-9 Pseudorotalia indopacifica (Thalmann). Vertical sections. Fig. 7, P50215. Microspheric form. Sample NB 9460. Fig. 8, P50126. Highly trochoid megalospheric form (trending towards Rotalia alveiformis Thalmann). Sample NB 9460. Fig. 9, P50217. Megalospheric form. Sample NB 9449. All specimens x 25. , Figs 10,11 Pseudorotalia catilliformis (Thalmann). Vertical sections. Fig. 10, P50218. Microspheric form (final chamber broken). Sample NB 9456/7. Fig. 11, P50219. Megalospheric form. Sample NB 9454. x 20. Figs 12, 13 Pseudorotalia schroeteriana (Parker & Jones). Vertical sections. Fig. 12, P50220. Immature megalospheric specimen (cf. Gyroidina conoides d’Orbigny). Sample NB 9452. x40. Fig. 13, P50221. Adult megalospheric specimen; the test has outgrown the conical shape. Sample NB 9449. x 30. Fig. 14 Calcarina hispida Brady. P50222. Vertical section. Sample NB 9450. x 40. Figs 15, 16 Cellanthus craticulatus (Fichtel & Moll). P50223, P50224. Equatorial sections of mega- lospheric and microspheric forms. Sample NB 9452. Fig. 15, x 20; fig. 16, x 12. Fig. 17 Epistomaroides polystomelloides (Parker & Jones). P50225. Off-centre equatorial section. Sample NB 9450. x 40. Figs 1 8, 19 Cellanthus adelaidensis (Howchin & Parr). P50226, P50227. Equatorial and axial Sections. Sample NB 9449. x 20. Fig. 20 Elphidiella indopacifica Germeraad. P50228. Axial section. Sample NB 9449. x 25. Fig. 21 Cellanthus biperforatus sp. nov. P50229. Axial section. Paratype, sample NB 9454. x25. Fig. 22. Cellanthus hailei sp. nov. P50230. Axial section; note the poreless plug. Paratype, sample NB 9460. x 25. Figs 23, 27 Operculina ammonoides (Schréter). Fig. 23, P50231. Vertical section. Sample NB 9452. Xx 15. Fig. 27, P50232. Equatorial section, early part of coil. Sample NB 9452. x 40. Fig. 24 Operculina bartschi Cushman. P50233. Equatorial section, early part of coil. Sample NB 9452. x 40. Fig. 25 Nummulites tamanensis (Vaughan & Cole). P50234. Equatorial section, early part of coil. Note characteristic ‘trabeculae’ in spiral sheet. Sample NB 9452. x 17. Fig. 26 Nummulites cf. amplicuneatus (Cole). P50235. Equatorial section, early part of coil. Sample NB 9452. x 40. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION = \ co pil ee + oR Fad Rm RTE r Ys s ny 97 98 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny Pl. 8, fig. 14 1826 Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny : 277, no. 1; modéle 76. 1960a Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny; Banner & Blow: 3; pl. 1, figs la—c (lectotype), 4a-c. MATERIAL. | specimen. NB 9450. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0:20 mm, thickness 0:13 mm. RANGE, Recorded by Blow (1969) as Globigerina bulloides bulloides d’Orbigny with a range of late Miocene to Recent (Zone N16—Zone N23). Globigerina quinqueloba Natland Pl. 8, fig. 12 1938 Globigerina quinqueloba Natland: 149; pl. 6, fig. 7. MATERIAL. 5 specimens (mostly with final chamber missing). NB 9447. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0:20 mm, thickness 0-15 mm. RANGE. Recorded by Blow (1969) as Turborotalita quinqueloba (Natland) with a range of late Miocene to Recent (Zone N17—Zone N23). Genus GLOBIGERINOIDES Cushman, 1927 Type-species: Globigerina rubra d’Orbigny in de la Sagra, 1839. Globigerinoides ruber (d’Orbigny) Pl. 8, fig. 15 1839 Globigerina rubra d’Orbigny : 82; pl. 4, figs 12-14. 1960a Globigerina rubra d’Orbigny; Banner & Blow: 19; pl. 3, figs 8a, b (lectotype). MATERIAL. 4 immature specimens. NB 9449, 9454. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0-36 mm, thickness 0-25 mm. RANGE. Blow (1969) gives the range of Globigerinoides ruber (d’Orbigny) as late Miocene to Recent (Zone N16—Zone N23). Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady) Pl. 8, fig. 16 1877 Globigerina sacculifera Brady : 535 (description). 1884 Globigerina sacculifera Brady; Brady : 604; pl. 80, figs 11-17; pl. 82, fig. 4 (figures). 1960a Globigerina sacculifera Brady; Banner & Blow: 21; pl. 4, figs 1a, b (lectotype), 2a, b. MATERIAL. | immature specimen. NB 9460. DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0-21 mm, thickness 0-15 mm. RANGE. Recorded by Blow (1969) as Globigerinoides quadrilobatus sacculifer (Brady) forma typica (lectotypic form), with a range of early Miocene to Recent (Zone N6—Zone N23). Subfamily CATAPSYDRACINAE Bolli, Loeblich & Tappan, 1957 Genus GLOBIGERINITA Bronnimann, 1951 Type-species: Globigerinita naparimaensis Bronnimann, 1951. Globigerinita glutinata (Egger) Pl. 8, fig. 13 1893 Globigerina glutinata Egger : 371; pl. 13, figs 19-21. MATERIAL. 9 specimens (characteristic bulla usually broken off). NB 9449. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 99 DIMENSIONS OF FIGURED SPECIMEN. Greatest diameter 0-17 mm, thickness 0-13 mm. RANGE. Recorded by F. L. Parker (1967) as Globigerinita glutinata (Egger) with a range of late Miocene to Recent (Zone N16-Zone N23). Family EPONIDIDAE Hofker, 1951 Genus POROEPONIDES Cushman, 1944 Type-species: Rosalina lateralis Terquem, 1878. Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem) BE ieigs 12 1878 Rosalina lateralis Terquem: 25; pl. 7 (2), figs 11a—c. 1884 Pulvinulina lateralis (Terquem) Brady : 689; pl. 106, figs 2a—3c. 1915 Pulvinulina lateralis (Terquem); Heron-Allen & Earland : 714; pl. 53, figs 6-11. 1921 Pulvinulina lateralis (Terquem); Cushman : 336; pl. 69, figs 2a—c. 1949 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem) Said : 36; pl. 4, fig. 3. 1951d Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Asano: 18, text-figs 136, 137. 1956 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Bhatia : 23; pl. 3, figs 3, 4, 5a—c. 1959 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Graham & Militante : 96; pl. 14, figs 9a—c. 1960 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Barker : 218; pl. 106, figs 2a—3c (after Brady). 1961 Eponides lateralis (Terquem) Braga : 155; pl. 16, figs 10, 11. 1961 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Huang: 87; pl. 4, figs 29, 30. 1964a Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Rocha & Ubaldo: 415; pl. 2, fig. 11. 1965 Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll); Todd (pars) : 20; pl. 7, figs 4a—c only. 1970 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Matoba : 58; pl. 8, figs 2a—c. MATERIAL. 10 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:50-1:50 mm, breadth 0-37-1-12 mm, thickness 0:17-0:60 mm. REMARKS. Our larger specimens have compressed later-formed chambers embracing the test for over half its circumference with areal pores covering the whole of their ventral surface. The umbilicus is open, sometimes with an umbilical flap. There are too few well-preserved specimens in the Togopi material for us to follow up Resig’s (1962) investigations into the status of the genus Poroeponides (see Remarks under P. cribro- repandus Asano & Uchio, p. 100). DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano 1951d). The type specimens came from the Pliocene of the Island of Rhodes (Terquem 1878). Recent: Has been found in the western Pacific, East Africa, the Red Sea and the west coast of the Indian subcontinent. Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio Pl. 7, fig. 11 1951d Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio in Asano: 18, figs 134, 135. 1954 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Cushman, Todd & Post : 360; pl. 89, fig. 24. 1955 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Takayanagi: pl. 2, figs 19a, b. 1959 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Graham & Militante : 96; pl. 14, figs 8a-c. 1963 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Matsunaga: pl. 47, figs 3a, b. 1964 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Bhatia & Bhalla: pl. 2, figs 3a, b (non Rosalina lateralis Terquem, 1878). 2? 1964a Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll); Rocha & Ubaldo : 414; pl. 2, figs 10a, b. 1964 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Le Roy : F39; pl. 9, figs 26, 27. 219646 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Rocha & Ubaldo : 647 (list); pl. 1, figs 11, ? 15. 1965 Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll); Moura: 50; pl. 6, fig. 8 (non Nautilus repandus Fichtel & Moll, 1798). 21968 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Bhalla : 387; pl. 2, figs 8a, b. 1970 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Kim: pl. 3, figs 2a, b. 1970 Poroeponides lateralis (Terquem); Bhalla : 160; pl. 21, figs 6a, b. 1970 Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio; Matoba : 58; pl. 8, figs la-c. 100 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON MATERIAL. 9 specimens, NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:25-0:77 mm, breadth 0-20-0-60 mm, thickness 0-12-0-37 mm. REMARKS. The status of Poroeponides has been questioned by a number of authors, in particular Resig (1962) who studied the species Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll) from a Californian off- shore sample of Pleistocene age. She states that the early stages were found to be true Eponides, but the intermediate stage developed the characters of Poroeponides cribrorepandus Asano & Uchio, while the final stages represented forms which have been described as Sestranophora arnoldi Loeblich & Tappan. Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C684) nevertheless have retained all three genera. They argue that such ontogenetic stages are characteristic of many foraminiferal genera and that only adult stages can be used in classification. We have only the ‘Poroeponides-form’ in the Togopi material and therefore cannot comment further. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Asano & Uchio in Asano 1951d, Matsunaga 1963) and Okinawa (Le Roy 1964). Recent: Has been widely reported from the western Pacific, the coasts of India and south-eastern Africa. Family AMPHISTEGINIDAE Cushman, 1927 Genus AMPHISTEGINA @’Orbigny, 1826 Type-species: Amphistegina vulgaris d’Orbigny, 1826. Amphistegina cf. lessonii d’Orbigny Pl. 8, fig. 1 cf. 1826 Amphistegina lessonii d’Orbigny : 304, no. 3 (modéle 98 and pl. 17, figs 14 probably refer to A. quoii d’Orbigny; see Ellis & Messina 1940 et seqq.). MATERIAL. 3 specimens. NB 9449, 9452. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 1-10 mm, thickness up to 0-60 mm. Remarks. Imperfect preservation of our material allows no more than a tentative identification. Amphistegina cf. wanneriana Fischer Pl. 8, fig. 2 cf. 1927 Amphistegina wanneriana Fischer; Fischer : 170; pl. 217, figs 131a-—c. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Greatest diameter 0-80-1-70 mm, thickness 0:40-0:70 mm. REMARKS. A. wanneriana, erected by Fischer (1921 : 251) for the Amphistegina sp. nov. of Wanner (1910: 761), was not formally described or figured until 1927 (op. cit.). Our specimens are generally poorly preserved and, therefore, cannot be identified with cer- tainty. They do not have the coarse ornament shown by A. radiata (Fichtel & Moll) var. papillosa Said or by A. /essonii d’Orbigny var. pulchra Cushman & Todd. RANGE. A. wanneriana has been recorded only from the Pliocene sediments of eastern Indonesia. Family CIBICIDIDAE Cushman, 1927 Subfamily CIBICIDINAE Cushman, 1927 Genus CARIBEANELLA Bermudez, 1952 Type-species: Caribeanella polystoma Bermudez, 1952. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 101 Caribeanella ogiensis (Matsunaga) Fig. 64; Pl. 7, fig. 16 1954 Oinomikadoina ogiensis Matsunaga : 163, text-figs 1-3. 1955 Oinomikadoina ogiensis Matsunaga; Takayanagi: pl. 2, figs 20a, b. 1963 Oinomikadoina ogiensis Matsunaga; Matsunaga: pl. 50, figs 5a—c. MATERIAL. 20 specimens. NB 9448, 9449, 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:49-0:70 mm, thickness 0:15-0:27 mm. Number of chambers in final whorl 7-9. Fig. 64 Caribeanella ogiensis (Matsunaga). P50173. Apertural view of specimen figured on Pl. 7, fig. 16. Sample NB 9450. x 65. REMARKS. Initially like Cibicides, this species develops on each of the later-formed chambers of the final whorl two types of supplementary apertures: one, a spiral slit at the inner margin, the other, a smaller aperture at the basal outer margin of the chamber periphery. Our material agrees closely with the type figures. On the convex ventral surface the sutures are flush or depressed and often marked by a row of coarse pores. On the flattened spiral side the earlier whorls are obscured by thickening of the test; the final whorl has thickened sutures in the early part, narrower and depressed sutures in the later stage. Pores vary in size and distribution, sometimes being sparsely developed. We follow Loeblich & Tappan (1964 : C688-9) in regarding Oinomikadoina as a junior synonym of Caribeanella. There is no evidence that Caribeanella in the Indo-Pacific is part of the growth cycle of Planor- bulina as Schnitker (1969) claimed. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Pliocene of Japan (Matsunaga 1954, 1963); Matsunaga (1954) also states that the species is found in the Pleistocene of Japan but does not figure the material. Recent: Japan (Takayanagi 1955). Family PLANORBULINIDAE Schwager, 1877 Genus PLANORBULINELLA Cushman, 1927 Type-species: Planorbulina larvata Parker & Jones, 1865. Planorbulinella larvata (Parker & Jones) Figs 65a, b, 66 1865 Planorbulina larvata Parker & Jones : 379, 380; pl. 19, figs 3a, b. 1969 Planorbulinella larvata (Parker & Jones) Freudenthal : 82; pl. 4, figs 3, 4; pl. 5, figs 1, 2; pl. 6, fig. 4; pl. 12, figs 4—5b. MATERIAL, 2 specimens. NB 9448, 9449. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-86-1-36 mm, thickness 0-16-0-32 mm. DIsTRIBUTION. In his comments on the overall distribution of this species Freudenthal (1969) records it as commonly occurring in the Indian and Pacific Oceans (as far north as Japan) and in the Red Sea. There appear to be several reliable records as early as the Miocene (e.g. Le Roy 1964). 102 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Family ACERVULINIDAE Schultze, 1854 Genus GYPSINA Carter, 1877 Type-species: Polytrema planum Carter, 1876. Gypsina globula (Reuss) Pl. 7, fig. 10 1847 Ceriopora globulus Reuss : 33; pl. 5, figs 7a-c. 1884 Gypsina globulus (Reuss) Brady : 717; pl. 101, fig. 8. MATERIAL. 5 specimens. NB 9450, 9452, 9460. VARIATION. Greatest diameter 0:59-1:83 mm. RANGE. Miocene (Reuss 1847, Le Roy 1964) to Recent. Figs 65, 66a,b Planorbulinella larvata (Parker & Jones). 65, P50270. Segment of an equatorial half-section. Sample NB 9449. x30. 66a, b, P50269. Concave side and edge view. Sample NB 9448. x 40. Family CYMBALOPORIDAE Cushman, 1927 Genus CYMBALOPORETTA Cushman, 1928 Type-species: Rosalina squammosa d’Orbigny in de la Sagra, 1839. Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny) Pl. 7, fig. 13 1826 Rotalia squammosa d’Orbigny : 272 (106), no. 8 (nomen nudum). 1839 Rosalina squammosa d’Orbigny : 91; pl. 3, figs 12-14. 1839 Rosalina poeyi d’Orbigny : 92; pl. 3, figs 18-20. 1884 Cymbalopora poeyi (d’Orbigny) Brady : 636; pl. 102, figs 13a—c. 1915 Cymbalopora poeyi (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 24; pl. 10, figs la—c; pl. 14, figs Sa—c; text-figs 28a—c. 1921 Cymbalopora poeyi (d’Orbigny); Cushman : 308; pl. 59, figs 2a—c. 1949 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny) Said : 40; pl. 4, figs 14a, b. 1954 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Cushman, Todd & Post : 364; pl. 90, figs 15, 16. 1957 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Todd : 292 (table); pl. 91, figs 10a—c. 1959 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Graham & Militante : 108; pl. 18, figs 3a—c. 1960 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Barker : 210; pl. 102, figs 13a—c (after Brady). 1961 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Huang: 88; pl. 4, figs 14, 15. 1964 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Rocha & Ubaldo: 144; pl. 17, figs 8, 9, 12. 1965 Cymbaloporetta squammosa (d’Orbigny); Todd : 38; pl. 20, figs 3a—c. MATERIAL. 10 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0:52-0:60 mm, height 0-25-0-37 mm. Number of chambers in the last whorl 5-6. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: Sub-Recent of Timor (Rocha & Ubaldo 1964). Recent: Common in the western Pacific islands with an additional record from the Red Sea (Said 1949). First described from the Caribbean. J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON 103 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman) Pl. 7, figs 14, 15 1884 Cymbalopora poeyi (d’Orbigny) var.; Brady : 637; pl. 102, figs 14a-d. 1915 Cymbalopora poeyi (d’Orbigny) var. bradyi Cushman: 25; pl. 10, figs 2a—-c; pl. 14, figs 2a—c. 1924 Cymbalopora bradyi Cushman; Cushman : 34; pl. 10, figs 2-4. 1932 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman) Thalmann : 310. 21941 Cymbaloporetta poeyi (d’Orbigny); Le Roy: 42; pl. 3, figs 12-14. 1949 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Said : 40; pl. 4, figs 14a, b. 1954 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Cushman, Todd & Post : 364; pl. 90, figs 13, 14. 1954 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Kleinpell : 68; pl. 9, figs 3a—c. 1957 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Todd : 292 (table); pl. 91, figs 12a-c. 1959 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Graham & Militante : 108, pl. 18, figs 2a—c. 1960 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Barker : 210; pl. 102, figs 14a—-d. 21961 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Huang: 88; pl. 4, fig. 21. 1965 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Moura: 54; pl. 7, fig. 3. 1965 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Todd : 37; pl. 19, figs 1la—4c; pl. 20, figs 4a—c. 21968 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Albani: 116; pl. 10, figs 15, 17-19. 1969 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Resig : 57; pl. 7, figs 3a, b. 1970 Cymbaloporetta bradyi (Cushman); Matoba : 50; pl. 8, figs 7a—c. MATERIAL, 29 specimens. NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. Maximum diameter 0-40-1-2 mm, height up to 0-15 mm. Number of chambers in the last whorl 8-15. Up to eight whorls. REMARKS. This species shows wide variation in the height of the spire, the number of chambers in the last whorl and in the general shape of the test, probably reflecting the mode of attachment. The umbilicus is usually open, but occasionally it is partially closed by extra shell material. Resig (1969) reports that the ‘Tretomphalus-stage’ of the life-cycle has been observed in four of her specimens but no other authors appear to have recorded float-chambers in forms attributable to this species in the Indo-west Pacific region. For further details of C. bradyi see Hofker (19516 : 477-484, text-figs 331a-e). DistTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene/Pliocene of east Borneo (Le Roy 1941) and Fiji (Kleinpell 1954); Pleistocene of Hawaii (Resig 1969). Recent: Widely distributed in the western Pacific with addi- tional records from the Red Sea and south-east Africa. Cymbaloporetta plana (Cushman) Pl. 4, figs 19a, b, 20 1924 Tretomphalus bulloides (d’Orbigny) var. plana Cushman : 36; pl. 10, fig. 8. 1934 Tretomphalus planus Cushman; Cushman : 94; pl. 11, figs 1la—c; pl. 12, figs 18-22. 21954 Tretomphalus planus Cushman; Cushman, Todd & Post : 364; pl. 90, figs 17, 18. 1971 Tretomphalus bulloides (d’Orbigny) ‘planus form’ Todd : 166. MATERIAL. “Tretomphalus forms’ — 4; NB 9449. Specimens without float chamber — 86; NB 9449, 9450. VARIATION. ‘Tretomphalus forms’ Others Maximum diameter 0:47-0:51 mm 0:29-0-65 mm Height 0-40 mm 0-15-0-40 mm Number of chambers in the last whorl 4-7, number of whorls 3-4. REMARKS. Douglas & Sliter (1965) showed Tretomphalus is a junior synonym of Rosalina, the float chamber merely characterizing the gamont’s planktonic stage. This reproductive phase, moreover, appears to be present in a number of species of Rosalina and Cymbaloporetta. In the present material specimens with float chambers are rare, but on dissection are seen to be conspecific with the specimens without ‘floats’ found in the same sample. The species has the apertural characteristics of Cymbaloporetta and a flat or slightly depressed initial coil, and has 104 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON many fewer chambers than C. bradyi (Cushman). It compares most favourably with Cushman’s original description of T. bulloides var. plana (1924 : 36) which states ‘the early chambers form a ee much flattened cap and the whole “‘balloon-chamber” [when present] is much wider than igh’. DISTRIBUTION. From the Recent of Samoa (Cushman 1924, 1934); Guam, Fiji and Pinaki Atoll (Cushman 1934) and possibly Eniwitok (Cushman, Todd & Post 1954). Todd (1971) reports, but does not figure, this form from Midway Atoll, also in the western Pacific. There is no previous fossil record. Family NONIONIDAE Schultze, 1854 Subfamily NONIONINAE Schultze, 1854 Genus FLORILUS®* de Montfort, 1808 Type-species: Florilus stellatus de Montfort, 1808, nom. subst. pro Nautilus asterizans Fichtel & Moll, 1798. 68 Figs 67-70 Florilus asanoi nom. nov. 67-69, P50271—P50273. Side views showing variation in flaring of test. Sample NB 9450. 70, P50174. Apertural view of specimen figured on PI. 7, fig. 17. Sample NB 9452. All approx. x 70. Florilus asanoi nom. nov. (pro Nonion japonicum Asano, 1938) Figs 67-70; Pl. 7, fig. 17 1933 Nonion subturgidum Cushman (pars) : 43; pl. 10, figs 7a, b only (non Nonionina subturgidum Cushman, 1924). 2? 1936a Pseudononion tradecum Asano : 622; pl. 33, figs 7a—c. 1938a Nonion japonicum Asano : 593; pl. 15, figs 1—2b. 1941a Nonion boueanum (d’Orbigny); Le Roy : 78; pl. 1, figs 13, 14 (non Nonionina boueana d’Orbigny, 1846). 21949 Nonion nakosoense Asano : 428, text-fig. 2, nos 14-17. 21950 Nonion kidoharaense iwahorii Fukuta: 151; pl. 1, figs 2a, b. 1950 Nonion japonicum Asano; Asano : 2, text-figs 5, 6. 1959 Nonion japonicum Asano; Graham & Militante: 71; pl. 11, fig. 1. 1963 Nonion japonicum Asano; Matsunaga : pl. 37, figs 3a, b. 1964 Nonion japonicum Asano; Le Roy: F27; pl. 10, figs 12, 13. 1966 Florilus elongatus (d’Orbigny) ; Belford : 158; pl. 31, figs 8-12 (non Nonionina elongata d’Orbigny, 1826). 1967 Nonion japonicum Asano; Konda: 34 (table); pl. 4, fig. 11. 1968 Nonion japonicum Asano; Chiji & Lopez: 108; pl. 15, fig. 6. 1969 Nonion japonicum Asano; Konda: 89 (table); pl. 8, fig. 4. 4 Since this paper went to press, Dr F. Régl (personal communication) informs us that an application has been made to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature for the suppression of Florilus. Following the recent discovery of the Fichtel & Moll Collection in the Natural History Museum, Vienna, Rogl has found that the type-species of Florilus de Montfort is in reality a trochospiral form (i.e. a Hanzawaia), and therefore, to maintain stability of nomenclature, he considers the generic name should be suppressed, even though it has priority over Hanzawaia. If this application is ultimately upheld, the taxonomic position of F. asanoi will have to be reviewed. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 105 MATERIAL. 196 specimens. NB 9449, 9450, 9452, 9456/7, 9460. VARIATION. Length 0:27-0:52 mm, breadth 0-17-0-34 mm, thickness 0:14-0:22 mm. Number of chambers in the final whorl 11-16. REMARKS. Both Pseudononion japonicum Asano, 1936 and Nonion japonicum Asano, 1938a, belong to the genus Florilus, and as they are distinct, the latter, which we consider to be con- specific with the present material, must be given a new name. A new name is also necessary if Florilus (interpreted by many authors as merely a flaring form of Nonion) is not considered to be a true genus. Pseudononion, its junior synonym, must then also be rejected, and there would be two species of Nonion with the specific name japonicum. The shape of the test in the Togopi specimens is not constant (see Figs 67-69), the coil showing variation from moderately tight to strongly flaring. Nevertheless, the distinctive appearance of the final chamber, when seen in side view, is constant. The umbilicus is granular and the periphery of the shell, characteristically, non-lobate. In edge view the periphery at the beginning of the final whorl is acute to subrounded, and the apertural face variably compressed. Pseudononion tradecum, Nonion kidoharaense iwahorii and N. nakosoense, all from the Neogene of Japan, are very similar to variants in our material and it is possible that they may be conspecific with Florilus asanoi. Florilus asanoi has occasionally been confused with two of d’Orbigny’s species from the Tertiary of Europe, Nonionina boueanum and N. elongatus: N. boueanum possesses a markedly lobulate periphery, while N. elongatus has a final chamber which is narrow and strongly incurved at the umbilical end instead of broad and embracing as in F. asanoi. DISTRIBUTION. Fossil: ? Miocene (Asano 1949, Fukuta 1950), Pliocene (Asano 1938a, Matsunaga 1963) and Pleistocene (Konda 1967, 1969) of Japan; Pliocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964) and New Guinea (Belford 1966). Late Tertiary (? Pliocene) of Siberoet Island, Indonesia (Le Roy 1941a). Recent: The Philippines (Graham & Militante 1959), Japan (Chiji & Lopez 1968) and possibly Fiji (Cushman 1933). Family ANOMALINIDAE Cushman, 1927 Subfamily ANOMALININAE Cushman, 1927 Genus ANOMALINOIDES Brotzen, 1942 Type-species: Anomalina pinguis Jennings, 1936. Anomalinoides glabratus (Cushman) Figs 71la—c 1924 Anomalina glabrata Cushman : 39; pl. 12, figs 5-7. MATERIAL. 2 specimens. NB 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:39-0:45 mm, width 0:33-0:34 mm, thickness 0-20 mm. REMARKS. Placed within this genus on apertural characteristics. RANGE. Miocene (Matsunaga 1963) to Recent. as AGG SB: Figs 7la—c Anomalinoides glabratus (Cushman). P50274. Ventral, dorsal and apertural views. Sample NB 9450. x 70. 71 106 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Genus HANZAWAIA Asano, 1944 Type-species: Hanzawaia nipponica Asano, 1944. Hanzawaia nipponica Asano Pl. 7, figs 18a, b 1944 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano: 99; pl. 4, figs 1—-2b. 1951c Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Asano : 16, text-figs 24-26. 1955 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Takayanagi : 45; pl. 2, figs 21a, b. 1963 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Matsunaga: pl. 52, figs 5a—c. 1964 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Ishiwada: pl. 8, figs 113a, b. 1964 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Le Roy : F46; pl. 9, figs 28, 29. 1967 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Matoba: 255; pl. 29, figs 14a-c. 1968 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Chiji & Lopez: 107; pl. 15, figs 14a, b. 1970 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Kim et al. : pl. ix-2, figs Sa—c. 1970 Hanzawaia nipponica Asano; Matoba: 55; pl. 8, figs 10a—c. MATERIAL. 11 specimens. NB 9450. VARIATION. Length 0:33-0:40 mm, breadth 0-25-0-32 mm, thickness 0-10-0-11 mm. REMARKS. The Togopi specimens are small for the species and only two show signs of supple- mentary lobe development, even though all possess clear chamber flaps on the ventral side. Topo- types (BM(NH) no. P45449) from the Kakio Formation of Japan, however, suggest that this feature can be quite variable. DIsTRIBUTION. Fossil: Miocene of Okinawa (Le Roy 1964); ? Upper Miocene/Pliocene (Mat- sunaga 1963), Pliocene (Asano 1944, 1951c) and Pleistocene (Matoba 1967) of Japan. Recent: Widespread around the coasts of Japan, but elsewhere it appears to have been found only off south-west Korea (Kim ef al. 1970). Postscript Since this paper went to press, Ujiié (1977) has described and figured a number of species he previously listed (1970) from the M. Miocene Sandakan Formation of Sabah. Two of them are of particular reference to the present work as they are stated by us to be extinct and of possible biostratigraphical use (Fig. 3, p. 10). The first of these, Bolivina amygdalaeformis of Ujiié (1977: pl. 5, figs 3a, b), is a Brizalina and is referable to Asano’s subspecies Brizalina amygdalaeformis iokensis, rather than to the nominate subspecies B. a. amygdalaeformis (Brady), which never has striations extending onto the last chamber (see p. 55). Ujiié’s record is the earliest known occurrence. The second, Bolivina cf. tikutoensis Nakamura (Ujiié 1977: pl. 5, figs 7a, b), appears to be very close to or identical with our new taxon B. sabahensis (see p. 54), and thus extends its strati- graphical range down into the M. Miocene. A further postscript is needed concerning the generic assignment of ‘Schackoinella’ globosa (Millett), p. 63. Quilty (1975: 329) has recently redefined and refigured the poorly-known type- species of Schackoinella, S. sarmatica Weinhandl from the late Miocene of Austria, and has shown it to be a true glabratellid with an umbilical aperture and radially striate ventral side. Neither the aperture, difficult as it is to discern, nor the ventral appearance of Millett’s species would now seem to allow its reference to Schackoinella, and therefore we propose to transfer it to Murrayinella Farias (1977: 343), a new genus tentatively assigned to the Rotaliidae. Murrayinella, type-species Rotalia murrayi Heron-Allen & Earland (1915), also includes R. erinacea Heron-Allen & Earland, as designated by Farias, which we have synonymized with Murrayinella globosa (Millett) (p. 63). FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 107 References Abrard, R. 1946. Fossiles Néogénes et Quaternaires des Nouvelles-Hébrides (Missions E. Aubert de la Riie, 1934-1936). Annis Paléont., Paris, 32 : 1-112, pls 1-5. Adams, C. G. 1970. A reconsideration of the East Indian letter classification of the Tertiary. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., London, (Geol.) 19 (3): 85-137. Albani, A. D. 1965. The foraminifera in a sample dredged from the vicinity of Salisbury Island, Durban Bay, South Africa. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 16 : 60-66, pl. 6. 1968. Recent Foraminiferida from Port Hacking, New South Wales. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 19 : 85-119, pls 7-10. 1974. New Benthonic Foraminiferida from Australian waters. J. foramin. Res., Washington, 4: 33-39, pl. 1. Antony, A. 1968. Studies on the shelf water foraminifera of the Kerala Coast. Bull. Dep. mar. Biol. Oceanogr., Ernakulam, 4: 11-154, pls 1-8. Aoki, N. 1965. Pliocene and Pleistocene uvigerinid foraminifera from the Bozo and Miura Peninsulas. Sci. Rep. Saitama Univ., Urawa, (B) 5 (1) : 49-63, pl. 7. Asano, K. 1936. Studies on the Fossil Foraminifera from the Neogene of Japan. Part 1. Foraminifera from Muraoka-mura, Kamakura-gori, Kanagawa Prefecture. J. geol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 43 : 603-614, pls 30, 31. 1936a. Part 2. Foraminifera from Kuromatunai-mura, Suttu-gun, Hokkaido. Joc. cit.: 615— 622, pls 32, 33. — 1938. On the Japanese Species of Elphidium and Its Allied Genera. J. geol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 45: §81—-591, pl. 14 (3). 1938a. On the Japanese Species of Nonion and Its Allied Genera. Joc. cit.: 592-599, pl. 15 (4). 19385. On the Japanese Species of Bolivina and Its Allied Genera. Joc. cit.: 600-609, pl. 16 (5). — 1938c. Japanese Fossil Nodosariidae, with notes on the Frondiculariidae. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai (ser. 2, Geol.), 19 (2) : 179-220, pls 24-31. — 1944. Hanzawaia, a new genus of Foraminifera from the Pliocene of Japan. J. geol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 51 : 97-99, pl. 4. — 1949. New Miocene Foraminifera from Japan. J. Paleont., Tulsa, 23 (4) : 423-430, figs 1, 2. — 1950-51. Illustrated Catalogue of Japanese Tertiary smaller Foraminifera. 1950. Part 1: Nonionidae, 1-12. 1950a. Part 2: Buliminidae, 1-19. 19505. Part 3: Textulariidae, 1-7. 1950c. Part 4: Valvulinidae, 1-4. 1950d. Part 5: Verneuiliniidae, 1-4. 1951. Part 6: Miliolidae, 1-20. 1951a. Part 7: Cassidulinidae, 1-7. 19516. Part 8: Polymorphinidae, 1-14. 1951c. Parts 9-13: Ophthalmidiidae, 1-2. Lituolidae, 3-7. Trochamminidae, 8-9. Chilostomellidae, 9-12. Anomalinidae, 12-19. 1951d. Part 14: Rotaliidae, 1-21. 195le. Part 15: Lagenidae, 1-39. Tokyo. — 1956. The Foraminifera from the Adjacent Seas of Japan, collected by the S.S. Soyo-Maru, 1922- 1930. Part 1, Nodosariidae. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai (ser. 2 Geol.), 27: 1-55, pls 1-6. 1956a. Part 2, Miliolidae. Joc cit.: 57-83, pls 7-9. — & Uchio, T. 1951. See Asano 1951. Banner, F. T. & Blow, W. H. 1960. The taxonomy, morphology, and affinities of the genera included in the subfamily Hastigerininae. Micropaleontology, New York, 6 (1) : 19-31, figs 1-11. 1960a. Some primary types of species belonging to the Superfamily Globigerinaceae. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 11 : 1-40, pls 1-7. Bannink, D. D. 1948. Een Monografie van het Genus Operculina d’Orbigny, 1826. 159 pp., 19 pls. Leiden. Barker, R. W. 1960. Taxonomic notes on the species figured by H. B. Brady in his report on the Foraminifera dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Accompanied by a reproduction of Brady’s plates. xxiv+238 pp., 115 pls. Tulsa (American Association of Petroleum Geologists, special publi- cation 9). Barnett, R. S. 1974. An application of numerical taxonomy to the classification of the Nummulitidae (Foraminiferida). J. Paleont., Lawrence, Kans., 48 (6) : 1249-1263, 5 figs. Batsch, A. J. G. C. 1791. Testaceorum Arenulae Marinae Tabulae sex priores ad opus, testacea minutiora, ... (&c.). 3 pp., 6 pls. Jena. Belford, D. J. 1966. Miocene and Pliocene smaller Foraminifera from Papua and New Guinea. Bull. Bur. Miner. Resour. Geol. Geophys. Aust., Canberra, 79 : 1-306, pls 1-38. Betjeman, K. J. 1969. Recent Foraminifera from the western continental shelf of Western Australia. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 20 : 119-138, pls 18, 19. Bhalla, S. N. 1968. Recent Foraminifera from Vishakapatnam beach sands and its relation to the known foramgeographical provinces in the Indian Ocean. Bull. natn. Inst. Sci. India, New Delhi, 38 : 376-392, pis 1, 2. —— 1970. Foraminifera from Marina beach sands, Madras, and faunal provinces of the Indian Ocean. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 21 : 156-163, pls 20, 21. 108 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON —— 1972. Some observations on the taxonomic status of Pararotalia nipponica (Asano) and allied species of Foraminiferida. J. geol. Soc. India, Bangalore, 13 (2) : 175-177. Bhatia, S. B. 1956. Recent Foraminifera from shore sands of western India. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 7: 15-24, pls 1-5. & Bhalla, S. N. 1964. Recent Foraminifera from the beach sand at Puri, Orissa. J. palaeont. Soc. India, Lucknow, (1959) 4: 78-81, pls 1, 2. Billman, H. G. & Kartaadipura, L. W. 1975. Late Tertiary biostratigraphic zonation, Kutei Basin, offshore east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Proc. 3rd a. Conv. indones. Petrol. Ass., Jakarta : 301-310, pl. 1. Blainville, H. M. D. de 1830. Mollusques, Vers et Zoophytes. In Levrault, F. G. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 60: 1-631. Paris. — 1834. Manuel d’ Actinologie ou de Zoophytologie. viiit+ 694 pp., 100 pls. Paris. Blow, W. H. 1969. Late middie Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In Bronniman, P. & Renz, H. H. (eds), Proceedings of First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneva 1967, 1: 199-422, pls 1-54. Leiden. Boomgaart, L. 1949. Smaller Foraminifera from Bodjonegoro (Java). 175 pp., 14 pls. Utrecht. — & Vroman, J. 1936. Smaller Foraminifera from the Marl Zone between Sonde and Modjokerto (Java). Proc. Sect. Sci. K. ned. Akad. Wet., Amsterdam, 39 : 419-425, 7 figs. Brady, H. B. 1876. On some Foraminifera from the Loo Choo Islands. Proc. R. Ir. Acad., Dublin, (Sci.) 2 (6) : 589-590. — 1877. Supplementary note on the Foraminifera of the chalk (?) of the New Britain Group. Geol. Mag., London, (2) 4: 529-534. —— 1879-81. Notes on some of the Reticularian Rhizopoda of the ‘Challenger’ Expedition. Part 2. Additions to the knowledge of Porcellanous and Hyaline types. Q. JI microsc. Sci., London, (n.s.) 19 : 261-299, pl. 8, (1879). Part 3. 1. Classification. 2. Further Notes on New Species. 3. Note on Biloculina mud. loc. cit. 21 : 31-71, (1881). —— 1884. Report on the Foraminifera dredged by H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873-1876. Rep. scient. Results Voy. Challenger (Zool.), London, 9. xxi + 814 pp., 115 pls. See Thalmann 1932. ——, Parker, W. K. & Jones, T. R. 1870. A monograph of the Genus Polymorphina: Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., 27 : 197-253, pls 39-42. Braga, J. M. 1961. Foraminiferos da costa de Mocambique. Publ¢ées Inst. Zool. Dr Augusto Nobre, Oporto, 77: 1-208, pls 1-21. Carpenter, W. B. 1856-60. Researches on the Foraminifera. Part 2. On the genera Orbiculina, Alveolina, Cycloclypeus and Heterostegina. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., London, 146 : 547-569, pls 28-31, (1856). Part 3, On the genera Peneroplis, Operculina and Amphistegina. loc. cit. 149 : 1-41, pls 1-6, (1860). —— assisted by Parker, W. K. & Jones, T. R. 1862. Introduction to the study of the Foraminifera. xxii+ 319 pp., 22 pls. London. Carter, A. N. 1964. Tertiary foraminifera from Gippsland, Victoria and their stratigraphical significance. Mem. geol. Surv. Vict., Melbourne, 23. 154 pp., 17 pls. Carter, D. J. 1953. Statistical Study of Operculina. J. Paleont., Lawrence, Kans., 27 (2): 238-250, pls 33-34. Caudri, C. M. B. 1934. Tertiary Deposits of Soemba. ix + 224 pp., 5 pls. Amsterdam. Chang L.-S. 1956. On the correlation of the Neogene formations in Western Taiwan and some diagnostic species of smaller Foraminifera. Mem. natn. Taiwan Univ., Taipei. 10th Anniv. Commem. Vol. : 113-121, pls 1-4. — 1960. A biostratigraphic study of the Miocene in Western Taiwan based on smaller Foraminifera. Part 2: Benthonics. Bull. geol. Surv. Taiwan, Taipei, 12 : 67-91, pls 1-16. —— 1964. A biostratigraphic study of the Tertiary in the Hengchun Peninsula, Taiwan, based on smaller Foraminifera (1 : Northern part). Proc. geol. Soc. China, Taipei, 7 : 48-62, pls 1-3. Chapman, F. 1907. Recent Foraminifera of Victoria: some littoral gatherings. J. Quekett microsc. Club, London, (ser. 2) 10: 117-146, pls 9, 10. — 1908. On Dimorphism in the Recent foraminifer, Alveolina boscii Defr. sp. JJ R. microsc. Soc., London, 1908 : 151-153, pls 2, 3. — & Parr, W. J. 1938. Australian and New Zealand species of the foraminiferal genera Operculina and Operculinella. Proc. R. Soc. Vict., Melbourne, (n.s.) 50 (2) : 279-299, pls 16, 17. Cherif, O. H. 1973. Zur Klassifizierung der Gattung Quinqueloculina (Foraminifera). N. Jb. Geol. Paldont. Abh., Stuttgart, 142 : 73-96, figs 1-15. Chiji, M. 1963. Foraminiferal faunules from the Uemati Formation, Osaka City. Bull. Osaka Mus. nat. Hist., 16 : 53-67, pls 5-7. —— 1968. Foraminiferal faunules from the upper part of Osaka Group in the deep boring (OD-1), Osaka City. Bull. Osaka Mus. nat. Hist., 21 : 55-61, pls 2, 3. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 109 — & Lopez, S. M. 1968. Regional foraminiferal assemblages in Tanabe Bay, Kii Peninsula, central Japan. Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Sirahama, Wakayama-ken, 16 (2) : 85-125, pls 6-15. Cole, W. S. 1954. Larger Foraminifera and smaller diagnostic Foraminifera from Bikini drill holes. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Sury., Washington, 260-O: 569-608, pls 204-222. 1958. Larger Foraminifera from Eniwetok Atoll drill holes. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 260-V : 743-784, pls 231-249. — 1959-61. Names of and variation in certain Indo-Pacific Camerinids. Bull. Am. Paleont., Ithaca, N.Y., 39 : 349-371, pls 28-31, (1959). No. 2. A reply. loc. cit. 43 : 111-128, pls 14-16, (1961). — 1965. Structure and classification of some recent and fossil Peneroplids. Bull. Am. Paleont., Ithaca, N.Y., 49 : 5-37, pls 1-10. — 1966. Additional comments on the foraminiferal genus Camerina. Bull. Am. Paleont., Ithaca, N.Y., 50 : 229-263, pls 20-27. Coleman, P. J. 1963. Tertiary larger foraminifera of the British Solomon Islands, southwest Pacific. Micropaleontology, New York, 9: 1-38, pls 1-9. Collins, A. C. 1958. Foraminifera. Scient. Rep. Gt Barrier Reef Exped., London, 6 (6) : 335-437, pls 1-5. Cox, L. R. 1948. Neogene Mollusca from the Dent Peninsula, British North Borneo. Schweiz. palaeont. Abh., Basel, 66 : 4-70. Crespin, I. 1954. Stratigraphy and micropalaeontology of the marine Tertiary rocks between Adelaide and Aldinga, South Australia. Rep. Bur. miner. Resour. Geol. Geophys. Aust., Melbourne, 12: 1-65, pls 1-7, Cushman, J. A. 1913-17. A monograph of the Foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean. Part 3. Lagenidae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 71 : 1-125, pls 1-47, (1913). Part 4. Chilostomellidae, Globigerini- dae, Nummulitidae. Joc. cit.: 1-46, pls 1-18, (1914). Part 5. Rotaliidae. Joc. cit.: 1-87, pls 1-31, (1915). Part 6. Miliolidae. Joc. cit.: 1-108, pls 1-39, (1917). — 1918. Foraminifera from Murray Island, Australia. Pap. Dep. mar. Biol. Carnegie Instn Wash. 9 : 289-290, pl. 96. — 1921. Foraminifera of the Philippines and adjacent seas. Contributions to the biology of the Philip- pine Archipelago and adjacent regions. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, (100) 4: 1-608, pls 1-100. — 1922. Shallow-water Foraminifera of the Tortugas region. Pap. Dep. mar. Biol. Carnegie Instn Wash. 17: 1-85, pls 1-14. — 1924. Samoan Foraminifera. Pap. Dep. mar. Biol. Carnegie Instn Wash. 21 : 1-75, pls 1-25. — 1926. Foraminifera of the Genera Siphogenerina and Pavonina. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 67 (25) : 1-24, pls 1-6. —— 1926a. Recent Foraminifera from Porto Rico. Publs Carnegie Instn, Washington, 344 : 73-84, pl. 1. — 1927. Foraminifera of the genus Siphonina and related genera. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 72 (Art. 20) : 1-15, pls 1-4. —— 1929. The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean. Part 6. Miliolidae, Ophthalmidiidae and Fischerinidae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 104: 1-129, pls 1-22. — 1932-42. The Foraminifera of the Tropical Pacific collections of the ‘Albatross’, 1899-1900. Part 1. Astrorhizidae to Trochamminidae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 161 (1) : 1-88, pls 1-17, (1932). Part 2. Lagenidae to Alveolinellidae. Joc. cit. (2) : 1-79, pls 1-19, (1933). Part 3. Heterohelicidae and Buliminidae. Joc. cit. (3) : 1-67, pls 1-15, (1942). —— 1933a. Some new Recent Foraminifera from the Tropical Pacific. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 9 : 77-95, pls 8-10. —— 1934. Notes on the Genus Tretomphalus, with descriptions of some new species of a new genus Pyropilus. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 10: 79-101, pls 11-13. —— 1936. Some new species of Elphidium and related genera. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 12 : 78-89, pls 14, 15. —— 1937. A monograph of the foraminiferal family Valvulinidae. Spec. Publs Cushman Lab., Sharon, Mass., 8. xili+ 210 pp., 24 pls. —— 1939. A monograph of the foraminiferal family Nonionidae. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 191 : 1-100, pls 1-20. —— 1942. See 1932-42. —— 1946. The genus Hauerina and its species. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 22 : 2-15, pls 1, 2. — & Gray, H. B. 1946. Some new species and varieties of Foraminifera from the Pliocene of Timms Point, California. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 22: 65-69, pl. 12. — &Le Roy, L. W. 1939. Cribrolinoides, a new genus of the Foraminifera, its development and relation- ships. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 15: 15-19, pls 3, 4. 110 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON —— & McCulloch, I. 1948. The species of Bulimina and related genera in the collections of the Allan Hancock Foundation. Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped., Los Angeles, 6 : 231-294, pls 29-36. a 1950. Some Lagenidae in the collections of the Allan Hancock Foundation. loc. cit.: 295-364, pls 37-48. —— & Ozawa, Y. 1928. An outline of a revision of the Polymorphinidae. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 4: 13-21, pl. 2. —— —— 1929. Some species of fossil and recent Polymorphinidae found in Japan. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 6 (3-4) : 63-77, pls 13-16. 1930. A monograph of the foraminiferal family Polymorphinidae, recent and fossil. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 77 (6) : 1-195, pls 1-40. & Todd, R. 1942, The Genus Cancris and its species. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 18 : 72-94, pls 17-24. —— —— 1944. The Genus Spiroloculina and its species. Spec. Publs Cushman Lab., Sharon, Mass., 11: 1-82, pls 1-9. —— —— 1944a. The genera Baggina and Neocribrella and their species. Contr. Cushman Lab. foramin. Res., Sharon, Mass., 20 : 97-107, pls 15-17. ——, —— & Post, R. J. 1954. Recent Foraminifera of the Marshall Islands. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 260-H : 319-384, pls 82-93. Daleon, B. A. & Samaniego, R. M. 1957. Small foraminiferal hypotypes from the Neogene of Panay Island. Philipp. Geol., Manila, 11 (2) : 26-68, pls 1, 2. Defrance, M. J. L. 1820. In Levrault, F. G. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 16. 567 pp. Paris. Douglas, R. & Sliter, W. V. 1965. Taxonomic revision of certain Discorbacea and Orbitoidacea (For- aminiferida). Tulane Stud. Geol., New Orleans, 3 : 149-164, pls 1-3. Douvillé, H. 1906. Les Calcaires 4 Fusulines de l’Indo-Chine. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Paris, (4) 6 : 576-587. Durrand, A. 1898. On anchor mud from the Malay Archipelago. J/ R. microsc. Soc., London, 1898 : 255— 257. Egger, J. G. 1893. Foraminiferen aus Meeresgrundproben, gelothet von 1874 bis 1876 von S.M. Sch. Gazelle. Abh. bayer. Akad. Wiss., Munich, 18 (2) : 1-266 (193-458), pls 1-21. Ehrenberg, C. G. 1844. Uber die kleinsten Lebensformen im Quellenlande des Euphrats und Araxes, und formenreiche marine Tripelbildung von den Bermuda-Inseln. Ber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1844 : 253-275, 1 pl. —— 1854. Mikrogeologie. 374 pp., atlas 40 pls. Leipzig. Ellis, B. & Messina, A. 1940 et seqq. Catalogue of Foraminifera. New York, American Museum of Natural History. El-Naggar, Z. R. 1971. On the classification, evolution and stratigraphical distribution of the Globi- gerinacea. Jn Farinacci, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the II Planktonic Conference, Roma 1970, 1: 421-476, pls 1-7. Eysinga, F. W. B. van 1975. Geological time table (chart). 3rd edition. Amsterdam. Farias, J. R. 1977. Murrayinella: taxa nuevo par la cienca de Foraminiferos del Reciente de agua somera. Revta esp. Micropaleont., Madrid, 9: 343-345, pl. 1. Fichtel, L. & Moll, J. P. C. 1798. Testacea microscopica aliaque minuta ex generibus Argonauta et Nautilus ad naturam picta et descripta. xii+ 123 pp., 24 pls. Vienna. Fischer, P. J. 1921. Ein Pliocéanfauna von Seran (Molukken). Zentb/. Miner. Geol. Paldont., Stuttgart, 8 : 242-251. — 1927. Beitrag zur kenntnis der Pliozanfauna der Molukkeninseln Seran und Obi. Jn Wanner, J., Palaontologie von Timor. 179 pp., pls 212-217. Stuttgart. Flint, J. M. 1899. Recent Foraminifera. A descriptive catalogue of specimens dredged by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer Albatross. Rep. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 1897 : 249-347, pls 1-80. Fornasini, C. 1900. Intorno ad alcuni esemplari di Foraminiferi Adriatici. Memorie R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Cl. Sci. fis. Bologna, (ser. 5) 8 : 357-402, 50 figs. — 1906. Illustrazione di specie orbignyane di Rotalidi istituite nel 1826. Memorie R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Cl. Sci. fis. Bologna, (ser. 6) 3: 1-12 (59-70), pls 1-4. Freudenthal, T. 1969. Stratigraphy of Neogene deposits in the Khania Province, Crete, with special reference to Foraminifera of the family Planorbulinidae and the genus Heterostegina. Utrecht Micro- paleont. Bull., 1: 1-208, pls 1-15. Fukuta, O. 1950. On the fossil foraminifera fauna from Kimo, Haraya-muru, Chichibu-gun, Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Bull. Chichibu Mus. nat. Hist., Nagatoro, 1: 147-156, pl. 1. Ganapati, P. & Satyayati, P. 1958. Report on the Foraminifera in the bottom sediments in the Bay of Bengal, off the east coast of India. Andhra Univ. Mem. Oceanogr., Waltair, 2: 100-127, pls 1-6. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 111 Germeraad, J. H. 1946. The Geology of Central Seran. Jn Rutten, L. & Hotz, W., Geological, petrological and palaeontological results of explorations, carried out from September 1917 till June 1919 in the Island of Ceram (ser. 3. Geol.) 2. 112 pp., 1 pl. Amsterdam. Gnanamuthu, C. P. 1943. The foraminifera of Krusadai Island (in the Gulf of Manaar). Bull. Madras Govt Mus. new Ser., (Nat. Hist. Sect.), 1 (2) 5: 1-21, pls 1-4. Graham, J. J. & Militante, P. J. 1959. Recent Foraminifera from the Puerto Galera Area, northern Mindoro, Philippines. Stanf. Univ. Publs, Palo Alto, (Geol. Sci.) 6 (2) : 1-170, pls 1-19. Gronovius, L. T. 1781. Zoophylacium Gronovianum, exhibeus Animalia, Quadr upeda, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes, Mollusca, Testacea et Zoophyta, . . . (&c.). With an index by F_C. Meuschen (1763-81). 380 pp., 20 pls. Leiden. Hada, Y. 1931. Report on the Biological Survey of Mutsu Bay. 19. Notes on the Recent Foraminifera from Mutsu Bay. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 4, Biol.) 6 : 45-148, 95 figs. Haile, N. S. & Wong, N. P. Y. 1965. The geology and mineral resources of Dent Peninsula, Sabah. Mem. geol. Surv. Dep. Br. Terr. Borneo, Kuching, 16: 1-154. Haman, D. & Christensen, E. W. 1971. Schackoinella from Recent sediments of the Northern Asiatic Shelf. J. foramin. Res., Washington, 1 : 43-44, 3 figs. Hanzawa, S. 1935. Some fossil Operculina and Miogypsina from Japan and their stratigraphical signifi- cance. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 18 (1) : 1-29, pls 1-3. —— 1939. Revision of ‘Nummulites’ cumingii (Carpenter). Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 16 (3-4) : 225-232, pls 15, 16. Haynes, J. R. 1973. Cardigan Bay Recent Foraminifera (Cruises of the R.V. Antur, 1962-1964). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., London, (Zool.) Suppl. 4: 1-245, pls 1-33. Hedley, R. H., Hurdle, C. M. & Burdett, I. D. J. 1965. A foraminiferal fauna from the western Continental Shelf, North Island, New Zealand. Mem. N.Z. oceanogr. Inst., Wellington, 25 : 1-46, pls 1-7. —— 1967. The marine fauna of New Zealand: intertidal foraminifera of the Corallina offici- nalis zone. Mem. N.Z. oceanogr. Inst., Wellington, 38 : 1-86, pls 1-12. Hemming, F. 1954. See I.C.Z.N. Heron-Allen, E. & Earland, A. 1914-15. The Foraminifera of the Kerimba Archipelago (Portuguese East Africa). Part 1. Trans. zool. Soc. Lond., 20 : 363-390, pls 25-27, (1914). Part 2. loc. cit.: 543-794, pls 40-53, (1915). 1932. Foraminifera. Part 1. The ice free area of the Falkland Islands and adjacent seas. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Cambridge, 4: 291-460, pls 6-17. Hofker, J. 1927-30. The Foraminifera of the Siboga Expedition. Part 1. Siboga Exped., Leiden, Mon. 4: 1-78, pls 1-38, (1927). Part 2. loc. cit. Mon. 4a : 79-170, pls 39-64, (1930). See 19516. —— 1933. Papers from Dr Th. Mortensen’s Pacific Expedition 1914-16. Foraminifera from the Malay Archipelago. Vidensk. Meddr dansk. naturh. Foren., Copenhagen, (1932-33) 93 : 71-167, pls 2-6. — 1951. Recent Peneroplidae. Part 1 (continued). J/ R. microsc. Soc., London, 71 : 223-2339, figs 2-18. 195la. Part 2. loc. cit.: 342-356, figs 19-35. — 19516. The Foraminifera of the Siboga Expedition. Part 3. Siboga Exped., Leiden, Mon. 4a: 1-513, 348 figs. See 1927-30. — 1968. Foraminifera from the Bay of Jakarta, Java. Bijdr. Dierk., Amsterdam, 37 : 11-59, pls 1-12. — 1970-71. Studies of Foraminifera. Part 2. Publtiés natuurh. Genoot. Limburg, Maastricht, 20 (1 & 2): 1-98, pls 25-53, (1970). Part 3. Joc. cit. 21 (1-3) : 1-202, pls 55-109, (1971). Howchin, W. & Parr, W. J. 1938. Notes on the geological features and foraminiferal fauna of the Metro- politan Abattoirs bore, Adelaide. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., Adelaide, 62 (2) : 287-317, pls 15-19. Huang T.-Y. 1961. Smaller foraminifera from the beach sands at Tanmenkang, Pachao-Tao, Penghu. Proc. geol. Soc. China, Taipei, 4: 83-90, pls 1-5. 1962. Notes on Elphidium tikutoensis Nakamura, 1937. Mem. geol. Soc. China, Taipei, 1: 193-195, pl. —— 1963 (1964). Smaller foraminifera from the Sanhsien-Chi, Taitung, eastern Taiwan. Proc. geol. Soc. China, Taipei, 7 (1963) : 63-72, pls 1-4. A oa ‘Rotalia’ group from the Upper Cenozoic of Taiwan. Micropaleontology, New York, 10 (1): —6§2, pls 1-3. —— 1967. Foraminiferal study of the Tungliang Well TL-1 of the Penghu Islands. Petrol. Geol. Taiwan, Miaoli, 5: 131-149, pls 1-4. —— 1968. Notes on the species of Foraminifera named and figured by Nakamura in 1937 and 1942. Petrol. Geol. Taiwan, Miaoli, 6: 81-114, pls 1-8. 1971. Some foraminiferal lineages in Taiwan. Proc. geol. Soc. China, Taipei, 14 : 76-85, pl. 1. 112 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON I.C.Z.N. (Hemming, F., ed.) 1954. Opinion 261. Rejection for nomenclatorial purposes of the Index to the ‘Zoophylacium Gronovianum’ of Gronovius prepared by Meuschen (F.C.) and published in 1781. Rulings 1 & 2. Opin. Decl. int. Commn zool. Nom., London, 5 (22) : 281-296, 1 facsimile. Inoue, H. & Nakaseko, K. 1951. Foraminifera of the Miocene Sakuma Formation, Japan (Microbio- stratigraphic study of the Cainozoic strata of Japan; series 11). J. geol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 57 (664) : 7- 11, figs 1-4. Ishiwada, Y. 1964. Benthonic foraminifera of the Pacific coast of Japan referred to biostratigraphy of the Kazusa Group. Rep. geol. Surv. Japan, Tokyo, 205: 1-45, pls 1-8. Ishizaki, K. 1940. On Streblus schroeterianus (Parker & Jones) and allied species. Taiwan Tig. Kizi, Taihoku, 11 (2) : 49-61, pls 3, 4. —— 1943. On the species of Streblus in Taiwan. Taiwan Tig. Kizi, Taihoku, 14 (3-4) : 47-60, pls 1-2. . —— 1948. Six new fossil species of Streblus from eastern Asia. Acta geol. taiwan., Taipei, 2 (1) : 55-66, pl. 1. Jell, J. S., Maxwell, W. H. G. & McKellar, R. G. 1965. The significance of the larger Foraminifera in the Heron Island reef sediments. J. Paleont., Menasha, 39 (2) : 273-279, pl. 44. Jones, F. W. O. Rymer 1872. See Rymer Jones. Keijzer, C. J. 1936. On variability in East Indian Foraminifera. Temminckia, Leiden, 1 : 75-151, pls 4-6. Kikuchi, Y. 1964. Biostratigraphy of the Neogene and Quaternary deposits based upon the smaller Foraminifera in the southern Kanto region. Contr. Inst. Geol. Paleont. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, 59 : 1-36, pls 1-8. Kim, B. K., Kim, S. W. & Kim, J. J. 1970. Foraminifera in the bottom sediments off the southwestern coast of Korea. Tech. Bull. econ. Commn Asia Far E. Comm. Co-op. jt Prosp. miner. Resour. asian off- shore Areas, Kawasaki-shi, 3: 147-163, pls ix-1—ix-3. Kim, J. J. 1970. Recent foraminifera in the Korean Yellow Sea. Rep. mar. Geol. Geophys. Korea, Seoul, 1 (1): 101-118, pls 1-3. Kleinpell, R. M. 1954. Neogene smaller foraminifera from Lau, Fiji. Bull. Bernice P. Bishop Mus., Hono- lulu, 211 : 1-96, pls 1-10. Konda, I. 1967. Foraminiferal faunules from the Minabe-Sakai Shell Bed, Kii Peninsula, central Japan. (Studies on Japanese Pleistocene Foraminifera V.) Bull. Osaka Mus. nat. Hist., 20 : 31-38, pls 24. — 1969. Foraminiferal faunule from the Akugawa shell bed, Kii Peninsula, central Japan. Bull. Osaka Mus. nat. Hist., 22 : 85-96, pls 3-8. Kuwano, Y. 1950. New species of Foraminifera from the Pliocene formations of Tama Hills in the vicinity of Tokyo. J. geol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 56 : 311-321, 13 figs. — 1962. Foraminifera biocoenoses of the seas around Japan—A survey of Pacific-side biocenoses. Misc. Rep. Res. Inst. nat. Resour., Tokyo, 58-59 : 116-138, pls 1424. Lacroix, E. 1938. Sur une texture méconnue de la coquille de diverses Massilines des mers tropicales. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, 750: 1-8, 4 figs. 1938a. Révision du genre Massilina. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, 754: 1-10, 9 figs. Lamarck, J. B. de 1804. Suite des Mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annis Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, 5 : 349-357. — 1807. Explication des planches relatives aux coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris (cont.). Annls Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, 9 : 236, pl. 17. Le Calvez, J. & Le Calvez, Y. 1958. Repartition des Foraminiféres dans la Baie de Villefranche. I. Mili- olidae. Annls Inst. océanogr. Monaco, 35 (3): 159-234, pls 3-16. Le Calvez, Y. 1965. Les Foraminiféres. In Guilcher, A. et al., Les Récifs coralliens et le lagon de I’ ile Mayotte (Archipel des Comores, Océan Indien): 182-201, pls 13-16. Paris (Office de la Recherche scientifique et technique outre-mer). Le Roy, L. W. 1939. Some small Foraminifera, Ostracoda and otoliths from the Neogene (‘Miocene’) of the Rokan-Tapanoeli area, central Sumatra. Natuurk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Indié, Batavia, 99 : 215-296, pls 1-14. —— 1941. Smaller Foraminifera from the late Tertiary of the Nederlands East Indies. Part 1. Small Foraminifera from the late Tertiary of the Sangkoelirang Bay Area, east Borneo, Nederlands East Indies. Colo. Sch. Mines Q., Golden, Col., 36 (1) : 13-62, pls 1-3. 1941a. Part 2. Small Foraminifera from the late Tertiary of Siberoet Island, off the west coast of Sumatra, Nederlands East Indies. Joc. cit.: 64-105, pls 1-7. 19415. Part 3. Some small Foraminifera from the type locality of the Bantamien sub- stage, Bodjong Beds, Bantam Residency, West Java, Nederlands East Indies. Joc. cit.: 107-132, pls 1-3. —— 1944. Miocene Foraminifera from Sumatra and Java, Netherlands East Indies. Part 1. Miocene Foraminifera of Central Sumatra, Netherlands East Indies. Colo. Sch. Mines Q., Golden, Col., 39 (3): 1-69, pls 1-8. 1944a. Part 2. Small Foraminifera from the Miocene of West Java, Netherlands East Indies. Joc. cit.: 71-113, pls 1-7. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 113 — 1964. Smaller Foraminifera from the Late Tertiary of southern Okinawa. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 454-F : F1-58, pls 1-16. Lloyd, A. R. 1967. Foraminifera from HBR Wreck Island No. 1 Well and Heron Island Bore, Queensland: their taxonomy and stratigraphic significance. 1. Lituolacea and Miliolacea. Bull. Bur. Miner. Resour. Geol. Geophys. Aust., Melbourne, 92 (1966) : 69-112, pls 9-15. Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. 1953. Studies of Arctic Foraminifera. Smithson. misc. Collns, Washington, 121 (7) : 1-150, pls 1-24. 1964. Protista 2. Sarcodina chiefly ‘Thecamoebians’ and Foraminiferida. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C. 1: 1-510, text-figs 1-399; 2 : 511-900, text-figs 400- 653. Kansas. Lutze, G. F. 1974. Benthische Foraminiferen in Oberflachen-Sedimenten des Persischen Golfes. Teil 1: Arten. Meteor ForschErgebn., Berlin & Stuttgart, (C) 17: 1-66, pls 1-11. Macfadyen, W. A. & Kenny, E. J. A. 1934. On the correct writing in form and gender of the names of the Foraminifera. J] R. microsc. Soc., London, 54: 177-181. Marks, P. 1956. Smaller Foraminifera from well no. 1 (Samur 1) at Kebajoran, Djakarta. Publikasi keilm. Djaw. Geol. Repub. Indonesia, Bandung, (Pal.) 30 : 1-47, pls 1-19. Matoba, Y. 1967. Younger Cenozoic foraminiferal assemblages from the Choshi district, Chiba Prefecture. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 38 (2) : 221-263, pls 25-30. — 1970. Distribution of Recent shallow water Foraminifera of Matsushima Bay, Miyagi Prefecture, northeast Japan. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, 42 (1) : 1-85, pls 1-8. Matsumaru, K. 1976. Larger Foraminifera from the Ryukyu Group, Nansei Shoto Islands, Japan. In Schafer, C. T. & Pelletier, B. R. (eds), First international symposium on benthonic Foraminifera of continental margins. Part B. Paleoecology and biostratigraphy. Spec. Publs marit. Sediments, Dart- mouth, Canada, 1 : 401-424, pls 1-5. Matsunaga, T. 1954. Oinomikadoina ogiensis, n. sp., from the Pliocene of Niigata, Japan. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (n.s.) 15 : 163-164, 3 figs. — 1963. Benthonic smaller Foraminifera from the oil fields of northern Japan. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 35 (2) : 67-122, pls 24-52. Meuschen, F. C. 1781. See Gronovius, L. T.; I.C.Z.N. Millett, F. W. 1898-1904. Report on the Recent Foraminifera of the Malay Archipelago collected by Mr A. Durrand, F.R.M.S. Part 1. JJ R. microsc. Soc., London, 1898 : 258-269, pls 5, 6. Part 2. loc. cit. : 499-513, pls 11, 12. Part 3. Joc. cit.: 607-614, pl. 13. Part 4. loc. cit. 1899 : 249-255, pl. 4. Part 5. loc. cit.: 357-365, pl. 5. Part 6. loc. cit.: 557-564, pl. 7. Part 7. Joc. cit. 1900 : 6-13, pl. 1. Part 8. loc. cit.: 273-281, pl. 2. Part 9. Joc. cit.: 539-549, pl. 4. Part 10. Joc. cit. 1901: 1-11, pl. 1. Part 11. loc. cit.: 485-497, pl. 8. Part 12. Joc. cit.: 619-628, pl. 14. Part 13. Joc. cit. 1902 : 509-528, pl. 11. Part 14. Joc. cit. 1903 : 253-275, pl. 6. Part 15. loc. cit.: 685-704, pl. 7. Part 16. Joc. cit. 1904 : 489-506, pl. 10. Part 17. loc. cit.: 597-609, pl. 11. Montagu, G. 1803. Testacea Britannica or Natural History of British Shells, marine, land, and fresh-water, including the most minute, 2 : 467-602, pls 1-16. Romsey. Montfort, D. de 1808. Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles, 1. \xxxviit+ 410 pp. Paris. Moura, A. R. 1965. Foraminiferos da ilha da Inhaca. Revta Estud. ger. Univ. Mocgambique, Lourengo Marques, (ser. 2) 2 : 3-74, pls 1-7. Murray, J. W. 1970. The foraminifera of the hypersaline Abu Dhabi lagoon, Persian Gulf. Lethaia, Oslo, 3 : 51-68, figs 5-10. — 1971. An Atlas of British Recent Foraminiferids. xiii+244 pp. 96 pls. London. —— 1973. Wall structure of some agglutinated Foraminiferida. Palaeontology, London, 16 : 777-786, pls 99, 100. Nakamura, M. 1937. New species of fossil Foraminifera from the By6ritu Beds of the oil fields of northern Taiwan (Formosa), Japan. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 14 (3-4) : 133-142, pls 10-12. Natland, M. L. 1938. New species of Foraminifera from off the west coast of North America and from the later Tertiary of the Los Angeles Basin. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr. tech. Ser., La Jolla, 4 (5) : 137-152, pls 3-7. Nicol, D. 1944. New west American species of the foraminiferal genus Elphidium. J. Paleont., Menasha, 18 : 172-185, pl. 29. Nervang, A. 1966. Textilina nov. gen., Textularia Defrance and Spiroplectammina Cushman (Foramini- fera). Biol. skr., Copenhagen, 15 : 1-16, pls 1, 2. Nuttall, C. P. 1960. Mollusca from the Togopi formation (Upper Caenozoic) of North Borneo. Rep. geol. Surv. Dep. Br. Terr. Borneo, Kuching, 1960 : 83-96. 114 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON —— 1965. Report on the Haile Collection of fossil Mollusca from the Plio-Pleistocene Togopi formation, Dent Peninsula, Sabah, Malaysia. Appendix in Haile, N.S. & Wong, N. P. Y., The Geology and Mineral Resources of Dent Peninsula, Sabah. Mem. geol. Surv. Dep. Br. Terr. Borneo, Kuching, 16 : 155-192. Orbigny, A. D. d’ 1826. Tableau méthodique de la classe des Cephalopodes. Annls Sci. nat., Paris, (ser. 1) 7: 96-169, 245-314, pls 10-17. —— 1839. Foraminiféres. Jn de la Sagra, M. R., Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de L’fle de Cuba. xlviii+ 224 pp., Atlas 12 pls. Paris. 1839a. Foraminiféres des Iles Canaries. In Barker-Webb, P. & Berthelot, S., Histoire naturelle des fles Canaries (Zool.), 2 (2) : 121-146, pls 1-3. Paris. 18395. Foraminiféres. Part 5 in Voyage dans Il’ Amérique meridionale 5. 86 pp., 9 pls. Paris. — 1846. Foraminiféres fossiles du bassin Tertiaire de Vienne (Autriche). xxxvii+ 312 pp., 21 pls. Paris. Parker, F. L. 1967. Late Tertiary biostratigraphy (planktonic Foraminifera) of tropical Indo-Pacific deep-sea cores. Bull. Am. Paleont., Ithaca, N.Y., 52 (235) : 115-208, pls 17-32. Parker, W. K. 1858. On the Miliolitidae (Agathisté¢gues, D’Orbigny) of the East Indian Seas. Part 1. Miliola. Trans. microsc. Soc. Lond., (n.s.) 6: 53-59, pl. 5. —— & Jones, T. R. 1860. On the nomenclature of the Foraminifera, Part 4. The species enumerated by Lamarck. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., London, (ser. 3) 5 (28) : 285-298. —— —— 1862. See Carpenter. —— — 1865. On some Foraminifera from the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, including Davis Straits and Baffin’s Bay. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., London, 155 : 325-441, pls 12-19. ——, —— &Brady, H. B. 1865. On the nomenclature of the Foraminifera, Part 11. The species enumerated by Batsch in 1791. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., London, (ser. 3) 15 : 225-232 (1865). Part 12. The species enumerated by d’Orbigny in the ‘Annales des Sciences Naturelles’, vol. 7, 1826. Joc. cit., 16 : 15-41, pls 1-3 (1865a). Parr, W. J. 1933. Notes on Australian and New Zealand Foraminifera, No. 2. The genus Pavonina and its relationships. Proc. R. Soc. Vict., Melbourne, (n.s.) 45 (1) : 28-31, pl. 7. —— 1941. A New Genus, Planulinoides, and some species of Foraminifera from southern Australia. Min. geol. J., Melbourne, 2 (5) : 305, 1 fig. —— 1945. Recent Foraminifera from Barwon Heads, Victoria. Proc. R. Soc. Vict., Melbourne, (n.s.) 56: 189-218, pls 8-12. Ponder, R. W. 1974. The ontogeny, morphology, taxonomy and distribution of the miliolid foraminiferan Quinqueloculina philippinensis Cushman, 1921. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., Sydney, 98 (4) : 242-250, pl. 13. 1975. Notes on the foraminiferal genus Hauerina and three of its species from north Queensland, Australia. J. nat. Hist., London, 9 (1) : 1-28, 68 figs. Postuma, J. A. 1971. Manual of Planktonic Foraminifera. vii+ 420 pp. Amsterdam. Puri, H. S. 1957. Reclassification, structure and evolution of the family Nummulitidae. J. palaeont. Soc. India, Lucknow, 2 : 95-108, pls 10-13. Quilty, P. G. 1975. A new species of Schackoinella from the Eocene of Western Australia with comments on the Glabratellidae. J. foramin. Res., Washington, 5 : 326-333, pl. 1. Rao, K. K. 1969. Foraminifera of the Gulf of Cambay. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc., 66 (3) : 584-596, pls 1-3. — 1971. On some Foraminifera from the northeastern part of the Arabian Sea. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Bangalore, B 73 (4) : 155-178, 59 figs. Reinhard, M. & Wenk, E. 1951. Geology of the Colony of North Borneo. Bull. geol. Surv. Dep. Br. Terr. Borneo, London, 1. xiv+ 160 pp. Reiss, Z. & Merling, P. 1958. Structure of some Rotaliidea. Bull. geol. Surv. Israel, Jerusalem, 21 : 1-19, pls 1-5. Resig, J. M. 1962. The morphological development of Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll), 1798. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Washington, 13 : 55-57, pl. 14. — 1969. Paleontological investigations of deep borings on the Ewa Plain, Oahu, Hawaii. Rep. Hawaii Inst. Geoph., Univ. Hawaii, HIG-69-2 : 1-99, pls 1-9. Reuss, A. E. 1847. Die fossilen Polyparien des Wiener Tertiarbeckens. Naturw. Abh. Wien, 2 (1): 1-109, pls 1-11. Rocha, A. T. 1965. Contribuigéo para o estudo dos foraminiferos do Quaternario do sul da Provincia Portuguesa de Mocambique. Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, 13 : 407-424, pls 1-5. — & Ubaldo, M. L. 1964. Foraminiferos do Terciario superior e do Quaternario da Provincia Portu- guesa de Timor. Mems Jta Invest. Ultramar, Lisbon, (ser. 2) 51: 1-180, pls 1-19. 1964a. Contribution for the study of Foraminifera from sands of Diu, Gogola and Simbor. Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, 12 : 407-420, pls 1-5. FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 115 —— —— 1964b. Nota sobre os foraminiferos recentes das areias das praias de Jampor (Damao) e de Baga (Goa). Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, 12 : 645-650, pls 1, 2. Rymer Jones. F. W. O. 1872. On some Recent forms of Lagenae from deep-sea soundings in the Java Seas. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., 30: 45-69, pl. 19. Said, R. 1949. Foraminifera of the northern Red Sea. Spec. Publs Cushman Lab., Sharon, Mass., 26: 1-44, pls 1-4. Samaniego, R. M. & Gonzales, B. A. 1957. Some common smaller Foraminifera from the Pliocene of Panay Island, Philippines. J. palaeont. Soc. India, Lucknow, 2 : 193-208, pls 21-24. Schlumberger, C. 1891. Révision des Biloculines des grands fonds. Mém. Soc. zool. Fr., Paris, 4: 542-578, pls 9-12. Schnitker, D. 1969. Cibicides, Caribeanella and the polyphyletic origin of Planorbulina. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Ithaca, N.Y., 20 : 67-69, pls 14, 15. — 1974. Ectotypic variation in Ammonia beccarii (Linné). J. foramin. Res., Washington, 4 : 217-223, plot. Schroter, J. S. 1783. Einleitung in die Conchylienkenntniss nach Linné, 1. 860 pp., 3 pls. Halle. Schubert, R. 1911. Die fossilen Foraminiferen des Bismarckarchipels und einiger angrenzender Inseln. Abh. geol. Bundesanst., Wein, 20 (4) : 1-130, pls 1-6. Schwager, C. 1866. Fossile Foraminiferen von Kar Nicobar. In: Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859. Geol. Theil 2 (2) : 187-268, pls 4-7. Vienna. Seguenza, G. 1862. Descrizione dei Foraminiferi Monothalamici delle marne mioceniche del distretto di Messina. Dei Terreni Terziarii del distretto di Messina e dei foraminiferi monotalamici delle marne mioceniche messinesi, 2. 84 pp., 2 pls. Messina. Seibold, I. 1971. Ammonia Briinnich (Foram.) und verwandte Arten aus dem Indischen Ozean (Malabar- Kiiste, S.W.-Indien). Palaeont. Z., Berlin, 45 (1/2) : 41-52, pls 5-7. Sethulekshmi Amma, J. 1958. Foraminifera of the Travancore Coast. Bull. cent. Res. Inst. Univ. Kerala, Trivandrum, (ser. C, Nat. Sci.) 6 (1) : 1-88, pls 1-3. Smout, A. H. & Eames, F. E. 1960. The distinction between Operculina and Operculinella. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Washington, 11 : 109-114. Stinton, F. C. 1963. Teleostean otoliths from the Upper Tertiary strata of Sarawak, Brunei, and North Borneo. Rep. geol. Surv. Dep. Br. Terr. Borneo, Kuching, 1962 : 75-92. Takayanagi, Y. 1955. Recent Foraminifera from Matsukawa-Ura and its vicinity. Contr. Inst. Geol. Paleont. Tohoku Univ., Sendai, 45 : 18-52, pls 1, 2. Terquem, M. O. 1878. Les Foraminiféres et les Entomostracés — Ostracodes du Pliocéne supérieur de VIle de Rhodes. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr., Paris, (sér. 3) 1 (3) : 1-135, pls 6(1)-19(14). Tewari, B. S. & Kumar, A. 1968. Recent Foraminifera from beach sands of Jaffna, Ceylon. J. palaeont. Soc. India, Lucknow, 11 (1966) : 41-44, pls 14, 15. Thalmann, H. E. 1932. Nomenclator (Um- und Neubenennungen) zu den Tafeln 1 bis 115 in H. B. Brady’s Werk tiber die Foraminiferen der Challenger-Expedition, London 1884. Eclog. geol. Helv., Basel, 25 (2) : 293-312. —— 1933. Zwei neue Vertreter der Foraminiferen-Gattung Rotalia Lamarck 1804: R. cubana nom. nov. und R. trispinosa nom. nov. Eclog. geol. Helv., Basel, 26 (2) : 248-251, pl. 12. — 1934-35. Mitteilungen iiber Foraminiferen 1. Uber Rotalia (Turbinulina) gaimardi d’Orbigny, 1826. Eclog. geol. Helv., Basel, 27 (2) : 428-440, pl. 11, (1934). 2. Rotalia indopacifica, nom. nov. im indo- pazifischen Verbreitungsgebiet. Joc. cit. 28 (2) : 605-606, (1935). Todd, R. 1948. See Cushman, J. A. & McCulloch, I. — 1957. Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands. Part 3, Paleontology. Smaller Foraminifera. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 280-H : 265-320, pls 64-93. — 1957a. Foraminifera from Carter Creek, northeastern Alaska — a report on the discovery of a late Tertiary foraminifera fauna from the northeastern coast of Alaska. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washing- ton, 294-F : 233-235, pls 28, 29. —— 1965. The Foraminifera of the Tropical Pacific collections of the ‘Albatross’, 1899-1900. Part 4 — Rotaliform families and planktonic families. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus., Washington, 161 : 1-139, pls 1-28. — 1971. Tretomphalus (Foraminifera) from Midway. J. foramin. Res., Washington, 1: 162-169, pl. 1. — & Post, R. 1954. Smaller Foraminifera from Bikini drill holes. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washing- ton, 260-N : 547-568, pls 198-203. Tokunaga, S. 1901. See Yoshiwara, S. Uchio, T. 1950. In Kawai, K., Ueno, M. & Hozuki, M., Natural gas in the vicinity of Otaki, Chiba-Ken. JI Ass. Petrol. Tech., Tokyo, 15 (4) : 151-219, 25 figs. 116 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON —— 1951. New species and genus of the Foraminifera of the Cenozoic formations in the middle part of the Bozo Peninsula, Chiba-Ken, Japan. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (n.s.) 2 : 33-42, pl. 3. —— 1952. Foraminifera assemblage from Hachijo, Tokyo Prefecture, with descriptions of some new genera and species. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 22 : 145-159, pls 6, 7. Ujiié H. 1963. Foraminifer from the Yarakuch6 Formation (Holocene), Tokyo City. Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daig. (C), 8 (79) : 229-243, pls 1-3. 1966. Shell structure of Japanese smaller Foraminifera, Part 2. Pararotalia nipponica (Asano 1936). Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (n.s.) 61 : 191-200, pls 24, 25. 1970. Miocene foraminiferal faunas from the Sandakan Formation, North Borneo. Geol. Palaeont. S E Asia, Tokyo, 8: 165-185, pls 23, 24. —— 1977. New species and subspecies of benthonic Foraminifera from the Miocene Sandakan Formation, North Borneo. Geol. Palaeont. S E Asia, Tokyo, 18 : 87-102, pls 14-21. Vaughan, T. W. & Cole, W. S. 1941. Preliminary report on the Cretaceous and Tertiary larger Foramini- fera of Trinidad, British West Indies. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 30: 1-137, pls 146. Visser, W. A. & Hermes, J. J. 1962. Geological results of the exploration for oil in the Netherlands New Guinea. Verh. K. ned. geol. mijnb. Genoot., The Hague, (spec. no.) 20: 1-265, 8 encl. Vlerk, I. M. van der & Bannink, D. D. 1969. Biometrical investigations on Operculina. Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet., Amsterdam, B 72 (3) : 169-174, figs 1-3. Vroman, J. 1936. See Boomgaart, L. & Vroman, J. Walker, G. & Boys, W. 1784. Testacea minuta rariora, Nuperrime detecta in Arena littoris Sandvicensis. 25 pp., 3 pls. London. Wanner, J. 1910. Beitrage zur Geologie des Ostarms der Insel Celebes. Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paldont. BeilBd, Stuttgart, 19 : 739-778. Weinhandl, R. 1958. Schakoinella, ein neue Foraminiferengattung. Verh. geol. Bundesanst., Wien, 2: 141- 142, 1 fig. Wiesner, H. 1923. Die Miliolideen der éstlichen Adria. 113 pp., 20 pls. Prague. Williamson, W. C. 1848. On the Recent British species of the genus Lagena. Ann. Mag, nat. Hist., London, (ser. 2) 1 (1) : 1-20, pls 1, 2. — — 1853. On the minute structure of a species of Faujasina. Trans. microsc. Soc. Lond., (n.s.) 1: 87-92, pl. 10. — 1858. On the Recent Foraminifera of Great Britain. xx +107 pp., 7 pls. London. Yabe, H. & Asano, K. 1937. Contribution to the palaeontology of the Tertiary formations of west Java. Part 1. Minute Foraminifera from the Neogene of west Java. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 19 (1) : 87-126, pls 17-19. —— & Hanzawa, S. 1925. A geological problem concerning the raised coral-reefs of the Riukiu Islands and Taiwan; a consideration based on the fossil Foraminifera faunas contained in the raised coral-reef formation and the youngest deposits underlying it. Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 7 (2) : 29-58 (1-28), pls 5-10 (1-6). —— —— 1930. Tertiary foraminiferous rocks of Taiwan (Formosa). Sci. Rep. Téhoku Univ., Sendai, (ser. 2, Geol.) 14 (1) : 1-46, pls 1-16. Yoshiwara, S. 1901. Notes on the raised coral reefs in the islands of the Riukiu curve. J. Coll. Sci. imp. Univ. Tokyo, 16: 1-14, pls 1, 2. Index New taxonomic names and the page numbers of the principal references are printed in bold type. An asterisk (*) denotes a figure. Abu Dhabi 16 nipponica 76 Anomalina pinguis 105 Acervulinidae 102 takanabensis 9, 13, 70-1, 70* Anomalinidae 105 Adelosina milletti 25 tepida 70 Anomalininae 105 Alveolina boscii 42 togopiensis 3, 10-12, 67*, 71-2, Anomalinoides 105 quoii 42 O7> glabratus 13, 105-6, 105* Alveolinella 42 yabei 11, 14 Asanoina 11, 71 quoyi 8, 12, 42-3, 75* Amphisorus 15, 42 globosa 79 Alveolinidae 42-3 Amphistegina 8, 100 Assilina 88 Ammomassilina 40 cf. lessonii 12, 75*, 100 nitida 94 Ammonia 66-72 radiata 100 Asterorotalia 72-6 annectens 9, 12, 66-8, 67* vulgaris 100 inspinosa 9-10, 12, 67*, 76, 97* beccarii 9, 13, 67*, 68-70 cf. wanneriana 9-10, 12, 75*, 100 pulchella 8-12, 67*, 72-4, 74*, 76 hozanensis 68 Amphisteginidae 100 trispinosa 72, 74 ikebei 11, 71 Amphorina gracillima 45 Ataxophragmiidae 15-16 FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 117 Australia 19, 27-8, 30, 32, 34, 37, 40, 43-4, 50-1, 55, 59, 62, 64-5, 79, 81, 83, 88, 95 Baggina gibba 63 Baggininae 62-3 Biloculina anomala 33 denticulata 33 millettii 16 ringens 33 biostratigraphy 5 Bolivina 54-5 amygdalaeformis 106 bilaensis 55 formosana 55 placata 54 sabahensis 3, 10, 13, 54-5, 54*, 61*, 106 striatula 55 tikutoensis 55, 106 vadescens 55 victoriana 55 Bolivinitidae 9, 54-7 Borneo 10, 30, 34, 42, 51-2, 57, 62, 72, 77, 83, 94, 103 British Museum (Natural History) 3, 15, 36, 56, 59, 63, 65, 68, 70 Brizalina 55, 106 amygdalaeformis iokiensis 10, 12, 55, 61*, 106 vescistriata 55 Buliminidae 57-8 Calcarina 11, 14, 81 calcar 77 hispida 9, 11-12, 73*, 81, 97* mayori 81 nicobarensis 77 pulchella 72 quoyi 81 rustica 81 spengleri 81 umbilicata 77 Calcarinidae 81 California 82 Camerina ammonoides 92, 93* laevigata 88 Cancris 13, 62-3, 67* auriculus 12, 62, 67* oblongus 62 Cardigan Bay 37 Caribbean 41, 64, 76, 102 Caribeanella 100 ogiensis 12, 73*, 101* polystoma 100 Catapsydracinae 98-9 Cellanthus 82-5 adelaidensis 10-12, 69*, 83, 97* biperforatus 3, 8, 10, 12, 72*, 84*, 97* craticulatus 12, 73*, 82-3, 83-5, 97* hailei 3, 10, 12, 69*, 85, 97* tikutoensis 87 tungliangensis 87 Ceriopora globulus 102 Ceylon, see Sri Lanka Chrysalidinella 57-8 dimorpha 13, 57-8, 61* Chrysalidina dimorpha 57 Cibicididae 100-1 Cibicidinae 100-1 Clavulina 16 angularis 16 Pacifica 12, 16, 21* Cribroelphidium 85-6 dentense 3, 10, 12, 73*, 85-6 vadescens 85 Cribrolinoides curta 22 Cribrononion 86 reticulosus 12, 69*, 86-7 tikutoensis 10, 12, 69*, 87 Cuba 24, 28, 76 Cycloclypeinae 95 Cycloclypeus (Katacycloclypeus) 5 annulatus 5 Cymbalopora bradyi 103 Poeyi 103 Cymbaloporetta 9, 15, 102-4 bradyi 13, 73*, 103, 104 plana 13, 61*, 103-4 squammosa 12, 73*, 102 Cymbaloporidae 102-4 Dendritina 41 arbuscula 41 striata 12, 39*, 41-2 Dent Peninsula, Sabah 6*, 7* Discopulvinulina bradyi 60 Discorbidae 59-63 Discorbina dimidiata 59 globularis 60 imperatoria 63 polystomelloides 64-5 Praegeri 59 rimosa 65 rugosa 63 Discorbinae 59-62 Discorbis 59 dimidiatus 13, 59, 61* globularis 60 laddi 59 micens 60 opima 60 tepida 68 Discorbites vesicularis 59 Edentostomina 16-17 cf. millettii 12, 16-17*, 39* Elphidiella indopacifica 9, 12, 73*, 87-8, 97* Elphidiidae 8, 81 Elphidiinae 81 Elphidium adelaidense 83 articulatum|excavatum group 86 batavum 83, 85 craticulatum 82, 83 crispum 82, 83 excavatum, see articulatum cf. fax barbarense 81-2 hispidulum 88 hokkaidoense 88 hyalocostatum 86, 87 indicum|hispidulum group 85, 88 Javanum 83, 84 kusiroense 86 milletti 87 reticulosum 86-8 rotatum 83 taiwanum 83-4 tikutoensis 87 sp. 14 11, 83 Entosolenia aquamosa 52 Eocene 10, 34, 65, 91 Epistomaria miurensis 65 Epistomariidae 64-6 Epistomaroides 64—5 polystomelloides 13, 64-5, 67*, OT rimosus 65 Eponididae 99-100 ‘Eponides’ globosus 63 Eponides lateralis 99 repandus 99-100 Faujasina 78-9 Faujasininae 88 Fijiella (Reussella) simplex 58 Fissurina 12, 52-4 circularis 13, 52, 61* laevigata 52 radiatomarginata 13, 53* Flintina bradyana 34-5 Florida 18 Florilus 104—5 asanoi 3, 9, 12, 73*, 104-5, 104* elongatus 104 stellatus 104 foraminifer, hypothetical 14* France 34, 91 Ganduman Formation 5 Gavelinopsis sp. 13, 59, 61* Glabratellidae 63-4 Glandulina 49, 51 comata 48 discreta 48 laevigata 13, 51-2, 52* nipponica 51 Glandulinidae 51-4 Glandulininae 51-2 Globigerina bulloides 9, 13, 75*, 96, 98 quinqueloba 9, 13, 75*, 98 rubra 98 sacculifera 98 siphonifera 96 Globigerinidae 96-9 Globigerininae 96-8 Globigerinita 98 glutinata 9, 13, 75*, 98-9 naparimarensis 98 Globigerinoides 98 obliquus 5 ruber 9, 13, 75*, 98 sacculifer 98 subquadratus 5 118 Globorotalia fohsi robusta 5 mayeri 5 praemenardii 5 Guttulina 49-50 Pacifica 12, 50* Guttuline, see Polymorphina com- munis Gypsina 15, 102 globula 12, 73*, 102 Gyroidina conoides 78 Hantkeninidae 95-6 Hanzawaia 106 nipponica 13, 73*, 106 Hastigerina 95-6 murrayi 95 siphonifera 9, 12, 75*, 95, 96 Hastigerininae 95-6 Hauerina 37-40 bradyi 40 circinata 13, 37-8, 38* compressa 37, 40 diversa 38 fragilissima 13, 38-40, 39* Hawaii 25, 31, 33, 36, 40, 64-5 Heterillina fragilissima 40 Heterostegina 8, 12, 75*, 95 depressa 95 operculinoides 95 pusillumbonata 95 Hyalinea balthica 94 India 18, 22, 30, 44, 65, 68, 70, 76, 81 Indonesia 10, 23, 25, 30, 57, 76-7, 83, 87, 105 Indo-Pacific 18, 26, 28, 31, 34-5, 37 41, 43, 45, 47-8, 52, 57, 65, 70, 76, 78, 82-3, 89, 101, 103 introduction 3 Jamaica 28, 76 Japan 18-19, 23, 25-8, 30, 33-5, 37, 40, 43, 45-8, 50, 52, 56-7, 59, 62, 64-6, 70-2, 76, 80-1, 83, 87-8, 99-101, 105-6 Java 25, 28, 32-5, 37, 45-8, 51-2, 57, 62, 76, 79, 83 Katacycloclypeus, see Cycloclypeus Kerimba 16, 25-7, 33, 40, 62-5, 79 Kutei Basin 10, 51, 71-2 Lagena 8-9, 13, 43-8 clavata 13, 43, 46, 75* var. setigera 43-4, 44* elongata 12, 45, 75* flatulenta 13, 39*, 45, 46 globosa 48 gracillima 13, 43, 45, 75* laevis 13, 39*, 43-4, 46 oceanica 44 perlucida 12, 39*, 43-4, 46-7 pliocenica 47 saccata 46 semistriata 13, 47* striata 12, 39*, 47-8 substriata 48 sulcata 43, 46, 48, 53 var. laevicostata 46 vulgaris 46 Lamellodiscorbis 59 Lenticulites complanatus 89 Lepidocyclina 5, 10, 14 (Nephrolepidina) aff. multilobata 14 Loxostoma amygdalaeformae lokiense 55 Malaysia, Geological Survey 15 Marginopora 15, 42 cf. vertebralis 12, 42, 75* Massilina agglutinans 32 australis 31-2 corrugata 26 Pacificensis 32 secans 33 methods 4 Miliola elongata 45 Miliolidae 8-9, 20-42 Miliolina auberiana 23 bosciana 25 cultrata 16 cuvieriana 22-3 deplanata 35 durrandii 16-17 exsculpta 25-6 Jichteliana 34 gracilis 31 kerimbatica 26 oblonga 36 parkeri 26 secans 31 tricarinata 36 Miliolinae 37-41 Miliolinella 13, 35, 37, 39* Miliolinellinae 37 Miliolites trigonula 34 Miocene 9-11, 14, 25, 30, 33-7, 42, 45, 47, 49-52, 55-7, 59, 62, 64, 66, 71-2, 76-80, 83, 89, 91, 94-9, 101-3, 105-6 Mozambique 30, 33, 57, 79 Murrayinella 106 globosa 63, 106 Nautilus ammonoides 92, 94 asterizans 104 auricula 62 beccarii 66 (Orthoceras) comatus 48 craticulatus 82 macellus 81 spengleri 81 Neogene 43, 45, 57, 77, 83, 87, 94 Nephrolepidina 5, 14 New Caledonia 36 New Zealand 51 Nodobaculariinae 19-20 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Nodosaria (Glandulina) comata 48 glans 48-9 laevigata 48-9, 51 Nodosariidae 43-9 Nodosariinae 43-9 Nonion boueanum 104 japonicum 3, 104—5 kidoharaense iwahorii 104-5 nakosoense 104-5 subturgidum 104 Nonionidae 104-5 Nonionina boueanum 105 elongatus 105 globosa 63 Nonioninae 104-5 Nubeculariidae 16 Nummulina discoidalis 94 Nummiulites 14, 88-9 cf. amplicuneatus 8-10, 12, 88, 89-91, 93*, 97* bikiniensis 89 rectilatus 89 tamanensis 8-10, 12, 89, 90-1, 93*, 97* willcoxi 88 Nummulitidae 8, 88-95 Nummulitinae 88-95 Oinomikadoina ogiensis 101 Okinawa 22, 30, 34, 37, 40, 50, 56-7, 59, 62, 66, 70, 76, 81, 94, 100, 105-6 Oolina 52 clavata 43 hexagona 13, 52, 61* laevigata 52 squamosa 12, 52, 61* striata 47 Oolininae 52-4 Operculina 5, 10, 15, 88-9, 92 ammonoides 8, 10, 12, 90-2, 92-4, 97* bartschi 8, 10, 12, 90-1, 93*, 94-5, 97* ornata 95 punctata 95 complanata 95 discoidalis 92, 94 elegans 94 gaimardi 92, 94-5 granulosa 92 hanzawai 92 heberti 90-1 Dhilippinensis 94 venosa 92 Operculinella 88, 91 venosa 92, 94 Operculinoides 88 amplicuneata 88 tamanensis 89 Ophthalmidiinae 16 Orbitolites orbitolitoides 41 Orbulina 5 Orthoceras, see Nautilus comatus FORAMINIFERA OF THE TOGOPI FORMATION 119 Pacific 31-4, 36-7, 40, 43, 45, 51, 57, 64-5, 77, 79, 81, 83, 89, 94, 99-102, 104 Palaeocene 91 Pararotalia 76-8 calcar 13, 67*, 77 cf. imperatoria 63 minuta 63 nipponica 9, 13, 77-8, 77* Parrellina 88 hispidula 13, 69*, 88 Pavonina 57 flabelliformis 13, 57, 61* Pavonininae 57-8 Peneroplinae 41 Peneroplis discoideus 41 planatus var. annulata 3, 12, 41, by proteus 41 Philippines 18-19, 25-6, 28, 31, 33, 35, 41, 43-4, 49, 51-2, 57, 65, 80, 95, 105 planktonic foraminifera 9, 11 Planorbulina echinata 64 Planorbulinella 101-2 larvata 13, 101-2, 102* Planorbulinidae 101-2 Pleistocene 11, 14, 33, 37, 40, 64-5, 68, 70-2, 76, 79, 82, 88, 94, 101, 105-6 Pliocene 10-11, 15, 18-20, 23, 25, 27-8, 30, 34, 37, 40, 43-8, 50, 52-3, 55-9, 62, 65-6, 68, 70-2, 76-7, 79-83, 88, 91, 94, 99-101, 103, 105-6 Plio-Pleistocene 3, 10-11, 23, 25, 28, 37, 40, 47, 52, 59, 62, 64, 66, 71, 79, 87, 89 Polymorphina elegantissima 50-1 (Guttuline) communis 49 Polymorphinidae 49-51 Polymorphininae 49-51 Polysegmentina 38 Polystomella arctica 87 craticulata 82 imperatrix 88 Polytrema planum 102 Poroeponides 99-100 cribrorepandus 13, 73*, 99-100 lateralis 13, 73*, 99 Pseudoeponides 65-6, 70 japonicus 10, 13, 65-6, 65* Pseudoglandulina glans 48 Pseudomassilina 31-3 australis 12, 29*, 31-3, 97* var. reticulata 32 medioelata 3, 12, 29*, 32-3, 32*, 97* Pseudonodosaria 13, 39*, 48-9 glans 12, 39*, 48-9, 49* Pseudononion japonicum 105 tradecum 104-5 Pseudorotalia 78 alveiformis 11 catilliformis 8, 10, 12, 14, 69*, 79-80, 97* conoides 11 indopacifica 11, 12, 69*, 80-1, 97* schroeteriana 12, 69*, 78-9, 97* tikutoensis 11 Puerto Rico 70 Pulvinulina auricula 62 lateralis 99 Pyrgo 33 anomala 13, 33, 39* denticulata 13, 33, 39* Quinqueloculina auberiana 23 bosciana 25 carinata 24 contorta 12, 20-2*, 21* curta 8, 12, 22-3*, 29* cuvieriana 13, 21*, 23-5, 29* disparalis var. curta 22 exsculpta 13, 21*, 25 kerimbatica 27 var. reticulostriata 27 var. philippinensis 27 laevigata 31 lamarckiana 23-5, 24* parkeri 12, 26-7, 26*, 29* Philippinensis 12, 27-8, 29*, 30 Poeyana 25 polygona 12, 28, 29* pseudoreticulata 12, 28, 29*, 30 reticulata 27, 30 chitanii 27 subpolygona 28 sulcata 29*, 30-1 thalmanni 27 tropicalis 13, 21*, 31* viennensis 24 Quinqueloculininae 20-37 Rectobolivina 56 bifrons 57 raphana 13, 56, 61* striata 13, 56-7, 61* Rectoglandulina glans 48 Red Sea 19, 31-2, 37, 43, 64, 94, 99, 101-3 Reussella 13, 58, 61* simplex 58 Rosalina 15, 59-60, 103 bradyi 13, 60 globularis 59-60 lateralis 99 poeyi 102 squammosa 102 Rotalia alveiformis 80 annectens 66 beccarii 66, 68 calcar 77 catilliformis 79-80 conoides 78 cubana 72, 76 erinacea 63, 106 hozanensis 68, 70 ikebei 72 indopacifica 80 inermis 76 maruhasii 70 murrayi 63-4, 106 nipponica 72, 76-8 ozawai 77-8 papillosa 78, 80 pauciloculata 70 polystomelloides 64 pulchella 72 schroeteriana 78-80 squammosa 102 taiwanica 77-8 tikutoensis 79-80 trispinosa 72 Rotalidium 68 Rotaliidae 8-9, 66-81 Rotalina (Calcarina) pulchella 72 Rotaliinae 66-81 Roumania 36 Sagrina bifrons 56 raphanus 56 striata 56 “Schackoinella’ globosa 13, 63-4, 67*, 97*, 106 sarmatica 63, 106 Schlumbergerina 13, 39*, 40 areniphora 40 Scutuloris 37 Sebahat Formation 5 Serpula laevis ovalis 46 seminulum 20 sulcata 43 Sestranophora arnoldi 100 Seychelles 27 Sicily 45 Sigmoidella 11, 50-1 bakomensis 51 elegantissima 11, 13, 50-1, 51*, o* kagaensis 50 Pacifica 50 Siphogenerina 13, 58 costata 58 raphana 56 striata 56-7 Siphonina echinata 64 Siphoninidae 64 Siphoninoides 64 echinatus 13, 64 Siphouvigerina 58 proboscidea 12, 58, 61* Soritidae 41-3 Soritinae 42 Sorites marginalis 41 Sphaerogypsina 15 Spiroloculina cf. 17-19*, 21* antillarum 17 canaliculata 19 communis 13, 18, 21* incisa 18 depressa 17, 19 eximia 13, 18, 21* fragilissima 38 grateloupi 18-19 lucida 13, 18-19, 21* manifesta 13, 19*, 21* angulata 13, 120 J. E. WHITTAKER & R. L. HODGKINSON Spiroloculininae 17-19 Textularia 15 Truncatulina echinata 64 Sri Lanka 37 foliacea 16 Turborotalia quinqueloba 98 Streblus annectens 66 malaccaensis 16 beccarii 68 stricta 15 iyizering 56 indopacificus 80 Timor 27, 30, 45, 57, 77, 83, 94, 102 i aba : nakamurai 70 Tonga 25-6, 87 P oho takanabensis 70 Tretomphalus 15, 103 P i Once ape vadescens 58-9 tikutoensis 79-80 bulloides 103-4 U ites anes 58-9 yabei 68 planus 103 ee Ae = Sumatra 16, 47, 49, 52, 55, 62 Triloculina 34-7 systematics 14 bermudezi 35 Valyulineria 63 bradyana 12, 34-5, 39* Valvulininae 16 cuneata 36 Vermiculum laeve 46 Taiwan 25, 28, 34-5, 50-2, 55-6, 62, fichteliana 34-5 oblongum 35 68, 70-1, 76, 79-80, 83, 87, 94 kerimbatica 27 perlucidum 46 Tasmania 51 oblonga 35-6, 36*, 39* squamosum 52 Textilina 15 subgranulata 12, 36, 39* subrotundum 37 conica 13, 15*, 21* reticulata 30 Verneuilina spinulosa 58 subrectangularis 3, 10, 12, 15-16, tricarinata 12, 36-7 Verneuilininae 15 21* trigonula 12, 34, 39* Vertebralina striata 13, 19-20* Accepted for publication 23 February 1976 British Museum (Natural History) Monographs & Handbooks The Museum publishes some 10-12 new titles each year on subjects including zoology, botany, palaeontology and mineralogy. ____ Besides being important reference works, many, particularly among _____ the handbooks, are useful for courses and students’ background ‘reading. _ Lists are available free on request to: Publications Sales British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD a Standing orders placed by educational institutions earn a discount ote of 10% off our published price. Titles to be published in Volume 31 Foraminifera of the LOEOR: Formation, eastern Sabah, Mele By J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. By W. J. Kennedy & H.C. Klinger. Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. By R. Watkins. The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian). By C. W. Wright. The entire Geology series is now available Type set by John Wright & Sons Ltd, Bristol and Printed by Henry Ling Ltd, Dorchester wt Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. Subscription orders and enquiries about back issues should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) © Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1979 ISSN 0007-1471 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Geology series Vol 31 No 2 pp 121-174 Issued 29 March 1979 . Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae W. J. Kennedy KX Department of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR H. C. Klinger South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town 8000, Republic of South Africa Contents Synopsis Introduction Location of specimens Field localities Dimensions of specimens Suture terminology Systematic palaeontology : Family Gaudryceratidae Spath Genus Eogaudryceras Spath . Subgenus Eogaudryceras Spath Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) shimizui Rceabereense Collignon : Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) hertleini (Wiedmann) Subgenus Eotetragonites Breistroffer Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) raspaili oe Breistroffer Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) umbilicostriatus Collignon Genus Gaudryceras de Grossouvre Gaudryceras cf. varagurense Kossmat . Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe . Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo) ‘Gaudryceras’ sigcau van Hoepen ‘Gaudryceras’ spp. : Genus Anagaudryceras Shimizu Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes) Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall) . Anagaudryceras politissimum (Kossmat) Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat) Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick) Genus Vertebrites Marshall Vertebrites kayei (Forbes) . Genus Zelandites Marshall Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat) Zelandites sp. 1 Zelandites sp. 2 é Genus Kossmatella Jacob Subgenus Kossmatella Jacob j Kossmatella (Kossmatella) marut (Stoliczka) Kossmatella (Kossmatella) aff. romana Wiedmann Acknowledgements References . Index Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 31 (2): 121-174 121 168 171 Issued 29 March, 1979 122 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Synopsis Members of the ammonite family Gaudryceratidae occur widely in the South African Cretaceous, and are locally common. The earliest representative of the group, Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras), appears in the Upper Aptian, and species of Gaudryceras range to the Campanian. In all, twenty species referred to seven genera have been recognized; thirteen of the species represent new records for the area. The follow- ing species are described: E. (Eogaudryceras) hertleini (Wiedmann), E. (E.) shimizui Breistroffer, Eogau- dryceras (Eotetragonites) raspaili raspaili Breistroffer, E. (Eotetragonites) umbilicostriatus Collignon, Gaudryceras cf. varagurense Kossmat, G. stefaninii Venzo, G. varicostatum van Hoepen, G. denseplicatum (Jimbo), G. tenuiliratum Yabe, ‘Gaudryceras’ sigcau van Hoepen, ‘Gaudryceras’ spp., Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes), A. subsacya (Marshall), A. politissimum (Kossmat), A. subtilineatum (Kossmat), A. pulchrum (Crick), Vertebrites kayei (Forbes), Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat), Zelandites spp., Kossmatella marut (Stoliczka) and Kossmatella aff. romana Wiedmann. Lectotypes of Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat) and Vertebrites kayei (Forbes) are selected. The collections allow illustration of the ontogeny and intraspecific variation in Anagaudryceras buddha and A. pulchrum, and show Gaudryceras cinctum Spath to be a synonym of G. varicostatum, ‘G.’ tenuiliratum van Hoepen to be a synonym of Anagaudry- ceras subtilineatum and G. amapondense van Hoepen to be a synonym of G. denseplicatum. Several of the species are adequately illustrated for the first time. Introduction The superfamily Tetragonitaceae Hyatt, 1900 is a group of long-ranging forms conservative in external morphology, but the most advanced of ammonites in terms of sutures. They have a sexlobate primary suture, with a formula E LU, U; Uj, and a septal lobe, Is (p. 123). As Wied- mann (1963, 1973) and Kullman & Wiedmann (1970) have demonstrated, this progressive septal pattern suggests that, had the ammonites weathered the Cretaceous/Palaeocene crisis, the tetra- gonitids would be the group which would probably still be with us. The group evolved from the Lytocerataceae during the Barremian, although no forms with intermediate sutures are known (Wiedmann 1962a: 147). There has been considerable disagreement as to the subdivision of the superfamily, and we have adopted Wiedmann’s conclusions in dividing the superfamily into two families, the Gaudryceratidae, South African representatives of which are described here, and the Tetragonitidae, to be described subsequently. The Gaudryceratidae range from Barremian to Maastrichtian, and have a world-wide distri- bution. They are, however, rare in the boreal areas of north-west Europe and the Soviet Union, and the western interior of North America, being best known from the circum-Pacific area, north, east and west Africa, Madagascar and Antarctica. Typical gaudryceratids (Gaudryceras, Verte- brites) are evolute, many-whorled, depressed at first, becoming compressed as size increases, with an ornament of coarse to fine lirae, and bearing constrictions. The sutures are typically lytoceratinid, with more or less symmetrical bifid saddles, and a prominent septal lobe. Departures from this type include compressed genera such as Mesogaudryceras Spath, 1927 and Zelandites Marshall, 1926 or coronate forms with a keel-like lateral angle — Jaubertella Jacob, 1908 and Gabbioceras Hyatt, 1900. There have been a number of attempts to subdivide the family. Kossmatella Jacob, 1907 has been placed in a subfamily Kossmatellinae Breistroffer, 1953, Vertebrites Marshall, 1926 in a sub- family Vertebritinae Wiedmann, 1962 and Gabbioceras Hyatt, 1900 and Jauberticeras Jacob, 1907 in a subfamily Gabbioceratinae Breistroffer, 1953. All of the gaudryceratids appear to be intimately related, and species of individual genera often develop, at some stage in ontogeny, features which typify one or other of these subfamilies, as will be clear from our subsequent discussions and those of Wiedmann (1962a, b), Henderson (1970) and others. We do not, therefore, subdivide the family here. In South Africa, gaudryceratids first appear in the Upper Aptian, with representatives of E. (Eogaudryceras). E. (Eogaudryceras) and E. (Eotetragonites) occur in the Middle Albian; the Upper Albian yields Kossmatella and abundant Anagaudryceras at some levels, and we have a few examples of the latter genus from the Upper Cretaceous. Gaudryceras appears in the Lower Cenomanian and occurs rarely up to the Campanian. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 123 Most described collections of gaudryceratids consist of relatively few specimens. We have large collections of two species, Anagaudryceras buddha and A. pulchrum, which allow description of the range of intraspecific variation and ontogenetic changes within the group, whilst redescrip- tion of van Hoepen’s material (1920, 1921) clarifies the relationships and nomenclatoral problems associated with the five gaudryceratids described by him. Location of specimens The following abbreviations are used to indicate the repositories of the material studied: BM(NH) British Museum (Natural History), London. MHNG Musée d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva. EMP Ecole des Mines, Paris. MHNP Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. SAS South African Geological Survey, Pretoria. ™ Transvaal Museum, Pretoria. UND University of Natal, Durban. DM Durban Museum. SAM South African Museum, Cape Town. UPE University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Field localities Outline details of field localities referred to in this paper are given in Kennedy & Klinger (1975); full descriptions of sections are deposited in the Palaeontology Library of the British Museum (Natural History). Dimensions of specimens Dimensions of specimens are given below in millimetres; abbreviations are as follows: D = Diameter Wb = Whorl breadth Wh = Whorl height U = Umbilical diameter Figures in parentheses are dimensions as a percentage of the total diameter. Suture terminology The suture terminology of Wedekind (1916, see Kullman & Wiedmann 1970) is followed in the present work: Is = Internal lobe with septal lobe U = Umbilical lobe L = Lateral lobe E = External lobe Systematic paiaeontology Class CEPHALOPODA Cuvier, 1797 Subclass AMMONOIDEA Zittel, 1884 Order LYTOCERATIDA Hyatt, 1899 Superfamily TETRAGONITACEAE Hyatt, 1900 Family GAUDRYCERATIDAE Spath, 1927 Genus EOGAUDRYCERAS Spath, 1927 Eogaudryceras is the root stock of all the younger gaudryceratids. Current treatment of the genus is sharply divided between those authors who would restrict it to forms without constrictions 124 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER (e.g. Spath 1927, Wright 1957, Murphy 1967a, b) and others (e.g. Wiedmann 1962a, b) who point to the presence of intermediates between the type species, E. numidum, and the type species of Eotetragonites Breistroffer, 1947, E. raspaili Breistroffer, and divide Eogaudryceras into two sub- genera. Eogaudryceras s. str. gave rise to the gaudryceratids and E. (Eotetragonites) to the tetra- gonitids. A further complication arises from the view of Murphy (1967a, b), who places Eotetra- gonites within the Tetragonitidae because of its phylogenetic position. For our present purposes, we are impressed by Wiedmann’s arguments, and have adopted a subdivision of Eogaudryceras into subgenera, as described below. Subgenus EOGAUDRYCERAS Spath, 1927 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites numidus Coquand 1880: 22, by original designation. D1AGnosis. Moderately evolute, whorl section initially trapezoidal, becoming rounded and in some cases laterally compressed when adult. Ornament consists of fine, flexuous lirae; mould smooth, constrictions absent or only weakly developed, typically confined to inner whorls. Suture with symmetrically bifid saddles and a large suspensive lobe. Discussion. Eogaudryceras was originally separated from Eotetragonites on the basis of the pre- sence of strong constrictions throughout development and a suture with irregularly bifid saddles in the latter genus. Whilst these differences separate the type species, Wiedmann (19625: 35) has pointed to the occurrence of Eogaudryceras with constrictions (£. Jlosetaense Breistroffer), Eotetragonites without constrictions (£. blieuxiensis Breistroffer) or with symmetrical saddles (e.g. Fallot 1920). The two subgenera are thus better separated on the basis of the intially trape- zoidal and subsequently rounded whorl and the fine, moderately curved striae of Eogaudryceras, as opposed to the square whorl section and general absence of curved striae in Eotetragonites. These points stress the similarities and close relationships between the two subgenera, and their critical position in tetragonitid phylogeny. Eogaudryceras also shows superficial similarities with Anagaudryceras Shimizu, 1934, but the fine lirae and frequent collar-ribs and constrictions of that genus differentiate juveniles, whilst adult ornament clearly differentiates the two. Gaudryceras Grossouvre, 1894 and Vertebrites Marshall, 1926 develop their distinctive ornament at such an early stage that confusion is unlikely. The following are the chief Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) species and varieties currently recognized: Eogaudryceras numidum numidum (Coquand 1880: 22) and E. numidum (Coquand) besavoaensis Collignon (1962: 13; pl. 221, fig. 956), Aptian-Albian; E. turgidum Breistroffer (1947 : 58), Aptian; E. vocontianum (Fallot 1920: 233; pl. 2, fig. 2; text-fig. 4), Albian; E. mun- taneri Wiedmann (1962b: 42; pl. 2, fig. 5; text-fig. 14), Albian; E. //osetaense Breistroffer (1947 : 58), Albian; E. elegans Basse (1928 : 134; pl. 8, fig. 8; text-figs 11-12), Albian; E. inequale Breistroffer (1947 : 58), Albian; E. shimizui shimizui Breistroffer (in Besairie 1936 : 175-176), Albian; E. shimizui skoenbergense Collignon (1949 : 50; pl. 21, figs 2, 3), Albian; E. shimizui gaonai Wiedmann (1962a : 153; pl. 8, fig. 4; text-fig. 13), Albian; E. bourritianum bourritianum (Pictet 1848 : 298; pl. 4, fig. la-c), Albian; E. bourritianum hispanicum Wiedmann (1962a : 155; pl. 12, fig. 6; text-fig. 15), Albian; E. italicum Wiedmann & Dieni (1968 : 34; pl. 1, fig. 8; text-fig. 6), Albian; E. hertleini (Wiedmann 1962c : 16, 18, 19; pl. 1, fig. 3), Aptian. OccurRENCE. E. (Eogaudryceras) ranges from the Upper Aptian to Upper Albian. Species are best known from the western Mediterranean area (southern France, Balearics, Sardinia) but also occur in northern Spain, England, central Europe, north Africa, Madagascar, California and South Africa (Zululand). Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) shimizui Breistroffer skoenbergense Collignon 1949 Eogaudryceras skoenbergense Collignon: 50; pl. 21, figs 2, 3. 1960 Eogaudryceras shimizui Breistroffer; Casey : 9; pl. 1, fig. 2. 1962a Eogaudryceras shimizui Breistroffer skoenbergense Collignon; Wiedmann: 151 et seqq. 1968 EHogaudryceras shimizui Breistroffer skoenbergense Collignon; Wiedmann & Dieni: 33 et seqq. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 125 Discussion. Collignon (1949) introduced Eogaudryceras skoenbergense in discussions of E. shimizui, basing the species on two figured specimens (1949 : pl. 21, figs 2-2b, 3-3b) said to be from the Skoenberg, Zululand. Wiedmann (1962a: 151), in his detailed discussion of Eogaudryceras, divided E. shimizui into three successive subspecies as follows: High Upper Albian: Eogaudryceras shimizui gaonai, with a depressed oval whorl section. Low Upper Albian: Eogaudryceras shimizui shimizui, with a compressed oval whorl section. Middle Albian: Eogaudryceras shimizui skoenbergense, with a rounded whorl section. Although we have collected no further specimens which can be referred to E. shimizui skoen- bergense, otherwise than the South African material known only very doubtfully from southern England, comment is needed because of the type locality given for the subspecies. No Middle Albian sediments outcrop on the Skoenberg, and the specimens are therefore of either Upper Albian or Cenomanian age, and FE. shimizui skoenbergense would thus be the Jatest known Eogaudryceras. Alternatively the specimens in fact come from Middle Albian sediments exposed along the Mzinene, well to the west (Kennedy & Klinger 1975), perhaps in the area of our Locality 53, on the farm Izwehelia (1975 : 288). Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) hertleini (Wiedmann) (Pl. 1, fig. 1) 1938 Lytoceras (Gabbioceras) wintunium Anderson : 150 (pars); pl. 15, fig. 5, non pl. 16, figs 2-5. 1962c Gabbiocerus hertleini Wiedmann: 16, 18, 19; pl. 1, fig. 3. 1967b Eogaudryceras hertleini (Wiedmann) Murphy: 9; pl. 1, figs 2-5. HorortyPe. California Academy of Sciences no. 8767, from the Upper Aptian of Shasta County, California. MATERIAL. A single specimen, BM(NH) C78755 from the Makatini Formation at Loc. 37, Mzinene River, Zululand (Aptian IV). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U BM(NH) C78755 39-5 18-0 (46) 16-4 (42) 1-1 12-2 (31) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is relatively involute, over 50% of the previous whorl being covered, with a depressed whorl section (whorl breadth/height ratio varies from 1-2 to 1-1, decreasing as diameter increases) with greatest breadth close to mid-flank. The umbilicus is small, with a sub- vertical wall and abruptly rounded shoulder. The sides are flattened with a broadly rounded venter during the early growth stages, the whorl section becoming rounded as diameter increases. The shell surface is covered by fine, flexuous striae which arise at the umbilical seam, and sweep forwards across the ventrolateral shoulders to form a broad, shallow ventral peak. Occa- sional groups of striae become stronger to produce incipient collar ribs, associated with faint constrictions (PI. 1, fig. la). The sutures are not fully visible in our specimen, but include a large bifid first lateral saddle (E/L), a smaller bifid second lateral saddle (L/U,) and a suspensive lobe with a large first auxiliary saddle. Discussion. Species of Eogaudryceras are differentiated chiefly on relative proportions, whorl section, form of growth striae and nature of constrictions, if present. Our specimen thus most Closely resembles Eogaudryceras hertleini, in particular the specimens figured by Murphy (19675 : pl. 1, figs 2-5). These specimens differ, however, in having some well-formed collar ribs, a feature poorly developed in our specimen. Murphy notes some variation in this feature, how- ever, and reference of our material to E. hertleini seems acceptable. Other species can be differentiated from Eogaudryceras hertleini as follows. Eogaudryceras bourritianum bourritianum (neotype refigured by Wiedmann 1962a: pl. 13, figs 2a—b, and by Murphy 19675: pl. 5, fig. 11) has a very depressed whorl section. E. bourritianum hispanicum Wiedmann (1962a: pl. 12, fig. 6; text-fig. 16) has a depressed, trapezoidal whorl section with a flattened venter. Eogaudryceras shimizui shimizui, skoenbergense and gaonai all have differing 126 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER whorl sections and are also easily distinguished by the presence of three conspicuous collar-like ribs per whorl. Eogaudryceras elegans Basse has a trigonal whorl section and lirae rather than striae; in E. llosetaense and E. muntaneri there are obvious constrictions, E. muntaneri having a trapezoidal whorl section. E. turgidum is depressed (whorl breadth/height ratio up to 1:4) with a trapezoidal whorl section. Eogaudryceras numidum numidum and besavoaensis have differing whorl sections, becoming trigonal and distinctly compressed at large diameters, with an abruptly rounded umbilical shoulder. OcCURRENCE. Eogaudryceras hertleini is known only from the Upper Aptian of California and Zululand. Subgenus EOTETRAGONITES Breistroffer, 1947 TYPE SPECIES. Eotetragonites raspaili Breistroffer, by original designation. Diacnosis. Moderately evolute, with a rectangular whorl section, even when young. Shell surface smooth, or finely striate; constrictions typically strong, and present throughout ontogeny. External suture line with asymmetrically bifid saddles; internal suture with an incipient second lateral saddle. Discussion. The relationship between Eogaudryceras and Eotetragonites is discussed above. There are also difficulties in separating some Eotetragonites from Tetragonites species, as might be ex- pected from their phylogenetic relationship. In general, however, the constrictions are deeper in Eotetragonites (although unconstricted forms are known) and straight or convex on the flanks with a strong ventral peak. The close relationship of the two taxa remains, however, as is clear from the reference of the same specimen to both in the most recent reviews, one by Wiedmann (19625) and the other by Murphy (1967a, b). The chief Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) species are: E. (Eot.) raspaili raspaili Breistroffer (1947 : 47), Aptian; E. (Eot.) raspaili jacobi (Kilian) (in Fallot 1920 : 237; pl. 2, fig. 7; text-fig. 6), Aptian; E. (Eot.) jallabertianus (Pictet 1848 : 302; pl. 4, figs 2a—b), Albian; E. (Eot.) plurisulcatus Breistroffer (1947 : 57), Aptian; E. (Eot.) umbilicostriatus Collignon (1949 : 48; pl. 13, figs 4a—b; pl. 21, fig. 5), Albian; E. (Eot.) duvalianum duvalianum (d’Orbigny 1841: 158; pl. 50, figs 4-6), Aptian; E. (Eot.) duvalianum (d’Orbigny) cheinourense Breistroffer & Mahmoud (1956: 81), Aptian-Albian; E. (Eot.) kossmatelliformis (Fallot 1920 : 240; pl. 2, figs 4a-c), Aptian; E. (Eot.) gainesi (Anderson 1938 : 153; pl. 20, figs 3, 4, 5), Albian; E. (Eot.) wintunius (Anderson 1938 : 150; pl. 16, figs 2-5, non pl. 15, fig. 5, = Eogaudryceras hertleini (Wiedmann)), Aptian; E. (Eot.) shoupi Murphy (19675 : 22; pl. 3, figs 7, 8, 9), Aptian; E. (Eot.) crudus Drushchits (1956: 105; pl. 8, fig. 29), Lower Albian; FE. (Eot.) gardneri Murphy (1967a: 75; pl. 1, figs 6-9), Aptian. OCCURRENCE. Eotetragonites ranges from the Upper Aptian to Middle Albian. Species are best known from the western Mediterranean (southern France, Balearics), and also occur in central Europe, Bulgaria, the Caucasus, north Africa, South Africa (Zululand), Madagascar and Cali- fornia. Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) raspaili raspaili Breistroffer (Pl. 1, fig. 6) 1866 Ammonites depressus Raspail : 29; pl. 2, fig. 9 (aon Ammonites depressus Bruguiére 1789). 1913 Lytoceras (Tetragonites) depressus (Raspail) Kilian : 329; pl. 11, fig. 3a—b. 1920 Tetragonites depressus (Raspail); Fallot : 239; pl. 2, fig. 8; text-fig. 7. 1947 Eotetragonites depressus (Raspail) Breistroffer : 56. 1947 Eotetragonites raspaili Breistroffer : 83. 19626 E. (Eotetragonites) raspaili Breistroffer; Wiedmann : 44. HOLortyPe. Original of Lytoceras (Tetragonites) depressus (Raspail) Kilian (1913: 329; pl. 11, fig. 3), from the Aptian of southern France. MATERIAL. One specimen only, BM(NH) C78772 from the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 175, Ndumu, Zululand (Albian III). SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 127, DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/|Wh U BM(NH) C78772 30-0 - 10-8 (36) - 11-5 (38) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is moderately evolute, slowly expanding, and distinctly polygonal on the outer whorl. The umbilicus is of moderate size (26% of diameter), shallow, with an outward- sloping wall and an abruptly rounded shoulder. The flanks are flattened and subparallel, the ventrolateral shoulders abruptly rounded, and the venter flattened. The surface of the shell is virtually smooth, save for fine, straight prorsiradiate striae on the flanks, which flex forwards across the ventrolateral shoulders to form a broad ventral peak. There are eight constrictions on the outer whorl; these are shallow on the shell, but deep and prominent on the internal mould, which is otherwise smooth. Constrictions arise at the umbilical seam, are strongly prorsiradiate on the flank, straight at first, but becoming faintly convex as diameter increases. They pass straight up the umbilical wall, sweep forwards across the inner flank and are markedly prorsira- diate, flex backwards across the mid-flank to pass straight across the upper flank, faintly back- wards across the ventrolateral shoulder and forwards across the venter to form a very shallow, broad ventral peak. Occasional striae are strengthened into low ribs (? 3 on the outer whorl), perhaps corresponding to the constrictions on the internal mould. The suture includes a large assymetrically bifid first lateral saddle (E/L) and a smaller but other- wise similar second lateral saddle (L/U,) separated by a large, deeply incised, bifid lateral lobe (L). Discussion. The limited number of constrictions on our specimen, their course, at first straight but later slightly convex, and the rectangular whorl section compare well with published figures of Eotetragonites raspaili. The rounded ventrolateral shoulders further suggest our specimen is closer to the restricted form than to Eotetragonites raspaili jacobi, where the shoulders are markedly angular. Other species, including Eotetragonites jallabertianus (see Murphy 19675: pl. 5, figs 7-8 for photographs of the type material), E. plurisulcatus (= Tetragonites duvali Anthula 1899: pl. 7, figs 3a—b), E. duvalianum duvalianum and cheinourense, E. kossmatelliformis, E. umbilicostriatus, E. gainesi, E. shoupi and E. wintunius all have far more constrictions, and these are generally curved or flexuous. OccurRRENCE. Upper Aptian of the western Mediterranean; Middle Albian of Zululand. Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) umbilicostriatus Collignon (Pl. 1, fig. 3) 1949 Eotetragonites umbilicostriatus Collignon : 48; pl. 8, fig. 4; pl. 21, fig. 5. 1963 Eotetragonites umbilicostriatus Collignon; Collignon ; 17; pl. 248, fig. 1060. Hototype. Original specimen figured by Collignon (1949: pl. 8, fig. 4; pl. 21, fig. 5) from the Lower Albian of Ambarimaninga, Madagascar. MATERIAL. A single specimen, BM(NH) C78830 from the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 36 on the Mzinene River, Zululand (Albian III). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Holotype (from : P Collignon 1949: 48)} sin a) eae?) ile Benes) Collignon 1963 : 17 71-0 32 (45) 32 (42) 1-00 2) BM(NH) C78830 38-0 ~ 14-6 (38) - 15-2 (40) DESCRIPTION. The specimen is poorly preserved, one side being abraded; it retains recrystallized test, so the sutures are not visible although the specimen is wholly septate. The coiling is fairly evolute, the whorls expanding at a moderate rate, with a ? depressed subrectangular whorl section, the greatest breadth being close to mid-flank. The umbilicus is broad and shallow, with a rounded, outward-sloping wall and an abruptly rounded shoulder. The sides are flattened and subparallel, the ventrolateral shoulder rounded, and the venter flattened. The test is weathered, 128 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER and growth striae, if once present, are no longer preserved. Instead, there are closely-spaced shallow, flexuous constrictions on the outer whorl. These arise at the umbilical seam, pass straight up the umbilical wall, flex gently forwards and are slightly convex on the flanks, flex gently back- wards across the upper flank, and gently forwards across the shoulder to connect across the venter with a weak ventral peak. So far as can be seen, the inner whorls bore fewer, broader, straighter constrictions, ? 6 per whorl. Discussion. Collignon (1949) based Eotetragonites umbilicostriatus on a juvenile specimen with four to five strong constrictions and a curious umbilical ornament. Subsequently (1963: 17; pl. 248, fig. 1060) he figured an adult showing denser constrictions, with which our specimen closely agrees. Eotetragonites umbilicostriatus can be separated from other species of the subgenus on the basis of the curious juvenile ornament, but when this is not preserved, the closely-spaced con- strictions are diagnostic, being far less flexed than those of Eotetragonites duvalianum, E. pluri- sulcatus, E. wintunius or E. gardneri. The constrictions of E. balmensis are straight on the flank, and the proportions are quite different; adult E. jacobi and E. blieuxiensis lack prominent constric- tions, E. raspaili has far fewer constrictions and a squarer whorl section, whilst the poorly-known E. jallabertianus has rather more, flexuous constrictions. OCCURRENCE. Lower Albian of Madagascar and South Africa (Zululand). Genus GAUDRYCERAS de Grossouvre, 1894 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites mitis von Hauer, 1866, by the subsequent designation of Boule, Lemoine & Thévenin (1906). SYNONYMY. Epigaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Gaudryceras striatum Jimbo 1894, by original designation); Pseudogaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Gaudryceras tenuiliratum var. infrequens Yabe 1903, by original designation); Hemigaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) denmanense Whiteaves 1901, by original designation); Neogaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe 1903, by original designation). D1AGnosIs. Typically evolute, early whorls depressed, slowly expanding, later whorls compressed, expanding more rapidly. Ornament consists of lirae, flexuous or branched, fine and wire-like throughout ontogeny or coarsening and bunching on the outer whorl. Constrictions are present on the internal mould, being marked on the shell by faint collars and depressions. Suture with large bifid lobes and saddles, suspensive lobe typically retracted, with several auxiliaries. DIsCussION. This genus has been reviewed at some length by Wright & Matsumoto (1954: 111- 113), Matsumoto (1959a: 141) and Howarth (1965: 360). Wiedmann (1962a: 156) provides a detailed synonymy for the genus, but we feel that, given currently accepted generic divisions of the gaudryceratids, Anagaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 and Mesogaudryceras Spath, 1927 bear separation as either genera or subgenera. About thirty specific names have been given to gaudryceratids which can be placed in the genus with certainty, as listed by Collignon (1956 : 67-69) and Howarth (1965 : 360), to which can be added Gaudryceras anomatum Collignon 1966 and Gaudryceras yokoyamaiforme Collignon 1969. Species of the genus fall into three subgroups, which may be differentiated on characters of adult ornamentation. They probably do not merit subgeneric separation: 1. The group of Gaudryceras mite von Hauer, where fine, equal ribs are present throughout ontogeny. The chief species are: Gaudryceras mite von Hauer (1866: 6; pl. 2, figs 3, 4), Santonian to Campanian; Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat (1895 : 122; pl. 17, fig. 9; pl. 18, fig. 2) Turonian to Campanian; Gaudryceras analabense Collignon (1956 : 54; pl. 6, figs 1-3), Coniacian; Gaudry- ceras beantalyense Collignon (1956: 53; pl. 5, figs 1-3), Coniacian; Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen (1921: 7; pl. 2, figs 10-12); Gaudryceras devallense Anderson (1958 : 183; pl. 41, fig. 4), Coniacian or Santonian; Gaudryceras striatum Jimbo (1894: 181; pl. 6, fig. 6), Santonian to Maastrichtian; Gaudryceras stefanini Venzo (1936: 21; pl. 2, figs 3, 4), Cenomanian. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 129 2. The group of Gaudryceras denseplicatum Jimbo, in which coarse, fold-like ribs appear in the adult in addition to finer lirae ( = Neogaudryceras Shimizu, 1934). The chief species are: Gaudry- ceras denseplicatum (Jimbo 1894: 182; pl. 23, figs 1-la), Turonian to Campanian; Gaudryceras glannegense Redtenbacher (1873 : 119; pl. 27, figs 3a—b), Coniacian; Gaudryceras lauteli Collignon (1956 : 57; pl. 7, figs 1-la), Santonian; Gaudryceras vascogoticum Wiedmann (1962a: 159; pl. 9, figs 2, 6; text-fig. 17), Coniacian; Gaudryceras amapondense van Hoepen (1920: 142; pl. 24, figs 1-3), Santonian to Campanian. 3. The group of Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe with finely ribbed inner and coarsely ribbed outer whorls. This includes Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe (1903: 19; pl. 3, figs 3, 4), Coniacian to Campanian; and Gaudryceras denmanense Whiteaves (1903 : 329), Campanian. In addition there is almost a score of juvenile gaudryceratids described in the literature which may be valid species or mere inner whorls of well-known forms. Many of these are listed by Collignon (1956: 70). Gaudryceras is readily separable from the more closely related gaudryceratid genera as follows. Anagaudryceras Shimizu, 1934, is typically very finely lirate, with widely-spaced constrictions and collars when young, and has adult whorls which may or may not develop coarse folds (= Para- gaudryceras auctt.) by approximation of constrictions. Mesogaudryceras Spath, 1927, is com- pressed, involute, and finely lirate, without constrictions. Vertebrites Marshall, 1926, is small, very evolute, serpenticone, with depressed whorls and an ornament of strong lirae on the flank which split into hair-like striae over the venter. Some Gaudryceras (e.g. G. stefaninii) develop this feature when young, foreshadowing the persistence of the feature in adult Vertebrites. OCCURRENCE. Gaudryceras has a time range extending from Upper Albian to Maastrichtian; the geographical range includes Antarctica, New Zealand, Madagascar, South Africa (Zululand and Natal), Angola, north Africa, the Middle East, central and southern Europe, southern India, Japan, Sakhalin, Kamchatka, Alaska, British Columbia, California, Chile and southern Pata- gonia. Gaudryceras cf. varagurense Kossmat (Pl. 1, figs 4, 7) cf. 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) varagurense Kossmat : 122; pl. 17, fig. 9; pl. 18, figs 2a—c. ef. 1965 Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat; Howarth: 36; pl. 4, fig. 5; pl. 5, figs 1-2 (with synonymy). ef. 1965a Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat; Collignon : 2; pl. 376, fig. 1635. ef. 196565 Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat; Collignon : 2; pl. 415, fig. 1712. ef. 1966 Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat; Collignon: 2, 3; pl. 455, fig. 1852. cf. 1966 Gaudryceras varagurense Kossmat; Howarth: 4; pl. 1, figs 6, 7 (with synonymy). MATERIAL. Two specimens. SAS SM/2 from the St Lucia Formation at Loc. 63, Skoenberg, Zululand (Coniacian I); BM(NH) C78825 from the St Lucia Formation at Loc. 85,*False Bay (Santonian I). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U SAS SM/2 31:8 11-6 (36) 10-8 (34) 1:07 15-6 (49) DESCRIPTION. The smaller specimen, SAS SM/2, is wholly septate, and retains recrystallized test. The coiling is very evolute, the whorls slowly expanding, depressed, but becoming less so as diameter increases. The greatest breadth is some way below mid-flank. The umbilicus is broad and shallow, with a low, subvertical wall, abruptly rounded shoulder, somewhat flattened, rounded, convergent flanks and a broad, arched venter. Ornament consists of fine dense lirae, which typically arise at all points from the umbilical seam to mid-flank; many branch at various points on the flank. The lirae pass forwards across the umbilical wall, are markedly prorsiradiate on the lower flank, but flex backwards at mid- flank only to flex forwards across the ventrolateral shoulder to form a distinct if shallow ventral peak. There are ? six strong collar-like ribs on the outer whorl, preceding shallow, narrow con- strictions. The sutures are not visible. The larger specimen, BM(NH) C78825, is a mere fragment, with a maximum whorl height of 130 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 18 mm. At this size, the whorls appear to have been slightly compressed, with convergent flanks. Typical flexuous lirae are present on the test, but the internal mould is smooth, save for constric- tions. The suture line is poorly exposed, but includes an asymmetrically bifid first lateral saddle (E/L), a smaller second lateral saddle (L/U,.) and a weakly retracted suspensive lobe. Discussion. The dense, even lirae and relative proportions of our two specimens clearly place them in the group of Gaudryceras varagurense; the ornament of our smaller specimen matches closely the inner whorls of Kossmat’s type. The taxonomy of this species has been clarified by Howarth (1965 : 362). As he notes, Gaudry- ceras mite is too poorly understood at present for satisfactory interpretation, whilst there are three names applied to forms matching our material in the Indian Ocean area: G. varagurense known from Cenomanian to Campanian, and Gaudryceras analabense and G. beantalyense both from the Coniacian of Madagascar, where they occur with G. varagurense. From the published figures, we doubt, however, that these species bear separation, although our material does not allow comment on the problem. G. analabense is said to possess markedly flexuous fine lirae with a strong ventral projection; G. beantalyense has less flexuous lirae and lacks a projection. OCCURRENCE. Gaudryceras varagurense ranges from Turonian to Campanian, and there are records from Spain, southern India, Madagascar, Antarctica and Angola in addition to our present Zululand occurrences. Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo (PI. 1, figs 2, 5, 8; Pl. 2) 1936 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) stefaninii Venzo : 21; pl. 2, figs 3, 4. 1956 Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo; Collignon : 67. 1963 Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo; Collignon : 16; pl. 247, fig. 1057. 1964 Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo; Collignon : 4; pl. 318, fig. 1352. Type. In a letter dated 15.5.1974, Dr Ladini Walter of the Museo di Paleontologica of the Univer- sity of Pisa informed us that part or all of Venzo’s collection may have been destroyed during the 1939-45 war. We have therefore refrained from designating a lectotype, since neotype designation may be necessary when the condition of the Venzo collection is known. 1M ATERIAL. Eight specimens, all from the Lower to Middle Cenomanian, Mzinene Formation of Loc. 62, Skoenberg, Zululand: SAS A834, SM/1, A1086; BM(NH) C78758-61, C78765. Plate 1 x 1, except Figs 2d—e Fig. 1 Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) hertleini (Wiedmann). BM(NH) C78755, Makatini Formation, Aptian IV, Loc. 37, on Mzinene River, Zululand. Figs 2,5, 8 Gaudryceras stefaninii Venzo. Fig. 2, SAS A834, Figs 2d-e x 3 to show details of ribbing on venter; Fig. 5, BM(NH) C78759; Fig. 8, SASSM/1; all Lower to Middle Cenomanian Mzinene Formation at Loc. 62, the Skoenberg, Zululand. See also Plate 2. Fig.3 Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) umbilicostriatus Collignon. BM(NH) C78830, Mzinene Formation, Albian III, Loc. 36, Mzinene River, Zululand. Figs 4, 7 Gaudryceras cf. varagurense Kossmat. Fig. 4, BM(NH) C78825, St Lucia Formation, Santonian 1, Loc. 85, False Bay, Zululand; Fig. 7, SAS SM/2, St Lucia Formation, Coniacian I, Loc. 63, the Skoenberg, Zululand. Fig. 6 Eotetragonites (Eotetragonites) raspaili raspaili Breistroffer. BM(NH) C78772, Mzinene Forma- tion, Albian III, Loc. 175, Ndumu, Zululand. Fig. 9 Anagaudryceras aff. sacya (Crick) (non Forbes). BM(NH) C18140, figd Crick (1907a: pl. 10, fig. 13), Mzinene Formation, presumably Albian or Cenomanian, Skoenberg area, Zululand. See p. 148. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 131 zi Myyfji{iiia”” Ns W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 132 "8 ‘¢ ‘7 S8Y “T ‘Id Os[e cag “purjninz ‘B1equaoyg oy} ZQ D0] ‘URTURIOUAD eIPPIJI JO JoMOT “UONeULIO OUSUIZ “O8OTY SVS ‘OZUeA uuluD{ajs svsa2dupnoy Ix Tt Vd SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 13)6} DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Syntype (Venzo 1936) 29 12 (41) 9 (31) 1-33 15 (51) ee 057 EME: ohh 19-0 80 (42) 60 (32) 1:33 90 (47) SAS A834 34-5 14:6 (42) 9528) «1-53 17-2 (50) SAS SM/I 36-2 14:9(41) 101(28) «1-47 17-4 2 (48) BM(NH) C78759 43-8 165137) 12328) _—«i1:30 22-9 (52) SAS A1086 c. 120 50-3(41) 52:8 (44) 0-95 43-0 (36) DESCRIPTION. Early whorls, up to 35 mm. The coiling is very evolute, serpenticone, the whorls slowly expanding, the whorl section very depressed (whorl breadth/whorl height ratio up to 1-53). The umbilicus is broad, shallow, with a low outward-sloping umbilical wall. The sides are strongly curved, with the greatest breadth at mid-flank. The ventrolateral shoulder is abruptly rounded, the venter flattened. Fine, dense, subequal lirae arise at the umbilical seam, sweep gently forwards across the umbilical wall, shoulder and flanks, sometimes branching low on the flank, at which point intercalated ribs may also appear. At the ventrolateral shoulder, lirae break up into bundles of extremely fine striae in Vertebrites-like fashion (Pl. 1, figs 2d-e), and pass straight across the venter. There are occasional straight, prorsiradiate, shallow, narrow constrictions. 35-60 mm. The expansion rate increases, the whorls become progressively less depressed, and eventually as broad as high. The umbilicus becomes smaller, and somewhat deeper. The lirae progressively coarsen, sweep forwards over the umbilical shoulder but are flexed on the lower flank, then pass straight across the upper flank and venter. Some branch, and occasional inter- calated lirae appear low on the flank. Periodic prorsiradiate constrictions are present, becoming increasingly closely spaced as diameter increases; behind each is a thickened, collar-like rib, also bearing lirae. When visible, the venter shows that lirae at first divide into twos and threes, but eventually pass across the venter without division. 60-120 mm. The expansion rate increases, so that the umbilicus becomes progressively smaller and deeper. Whorl height increases, and at the largest diameter preserved, the whorl is laterally compressed. Lirae coarsen, and collar-like ribs, bearing lirae, become frequent (PI. 2, figs 1a—b); in other respects, the ornament is like that of the middle growth stages. The sutures are not fully exposed. Discussion. Our collections provide the first detailed ontogenetic series for this curious species; our largest specimen is still wholly septate at 120 mm, and bears traces of a further septate half whorl. The depressed early whorls, with straight lirae on the flank and Vertebrites-like branching over the venter, readily separate this species from Gaudryceras varagurense, G. beantalyense, G. analabense and G. multiplexum at comparable diameters. Gaudryceras vertebratum Kossmat (1895: 126; pl. 15, figs 4-5) has inner whorls which are depressed like those of G. stefaninii, show a flattened venter, straight prorsiradiate lirae on the flank and a ‘smooth’ venter, but the outer whorl shows finer lirae than in our specimens. Without further Indian material it is not possible to assess the significance of these minor differences, or to place stefaninii in synonymy with vertebratum; the two species thus stand in the same relationship to each other as Gaudryceras varagurense does to G. analabense. Gaudryceras isovokyense Collignon (1964 : 31; pl. 324, fig. 1447) is a further Cenomanian species with a similar whorl section to G. stefaninii. The ribs do not, however, develop fine branches over the venter so far as can be seen from the figure, but this may reflect no more than slightly different rates of ontogenetic change. OccurRENCE. Lower and Middle Cenomanian of Zululand, Albian and Lower Cenomanian of Madagascar. Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen (Fig. 1; Pl. 3, figs 1-3; Pl. 4; Pl. 7, fig. 2; Pl. 14, fig. 11) 1921 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen: 7; pl. 2, figs 10-12; text-figs 3, 4. 1921b Gaudryceras kayei (Forbes); Spath : 50 (table). 134 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 1922 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen; Spath: 117. 1922 Gaudryceras cinctum (Crick ms) Spath: 118; pl. 9, figs 3a—3b. 21926 Gaudryceras propemite Marshall : 142; pl. 20, fig. 4; pl. 28, figs 3, 4. 1931 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) varicostatum (van Hoepen); Collignon : 12; pl. 2, figs 1-4; pl. 8, fig. 3. 1956 Gaudryceras sp. aff. cinctum (Crick) Spath; Collignon : 55; pl. 5, figs 4, 5. 1956 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen; Collignon : 56. 1965 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen; Howarth: 362. 1965 Gaudryceras cinctum Spath; Howarth: 362. 1966 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen; Collignon : 3; pl. 456, fig. 1854. 21970 Gaudryceras propemite Marshall; Henderson: 15; pl. 2, fig. 6. Ho.otyPe. By monotypy, TM 538, the original of van Hoepen 1921: 7; pl. 2, figs 10-12, from the Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, Pondoland (Santonian to Campanian). MATERIAL. Five specimens. The holotype TM 538, SAS P1418 and the holotype of Gaudryceras cinctum BM(NH) C19415, all from the late Santonian to early Campanian, Umzamba Formation, at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). SAS Z999 from the St Lucia Formation at Loc. 93 on the farm Ncedomhlope, ESE of Hluhluwe, Zululand (Conia- cian IT). SAS FB11 from the St Lucia Formation in the southern part of False Bay (age unknown). SAS Z1157 from the St Lucia Formation (Campanian II) the Nibela, Lake St Lucia, Zululand. DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U T™ 538 39-6 14-7 (37) 13-7 (35) 1-07 17-2 (43) BM(NH) C19415 (a) 65:3 - 25-3 (38) - 22:3 (34) (b) 49-0 18-2 (37) 17-2 (35) 1-1 18-5 (37) SAS P1418 29:3 10-7 (36) 9-8 (33) 1-09 14-0 (47) DescriPTION. Early whorls, up to 40 mm (PI. 3, figs 1-3). The coiling is evolute, slowly expanding, with a depressed whorl section (whorl breadth/height ratio 1-1), the greatest breadth being close to the umbilicus. The whorl sides and venter are rounded, the latter being a little flattened. The umbilicus is broad and of moderate depth, with a rounded wall and abruptly rounded shoulder. Fine, dense, prorsiradiate flexuous lirae arise at the umbilical seam, sweep forwards across the shoulder and inner flanks, and gently backwards across mid-flank. A few lirae branch at the umbi- licus and some intercalate on the flanks. The ventrolateral shoulders and venter are covered in fine dense striae, invisible to the naked eye, and produced by the splitting of the lirae at a position corresponding approximately to the umbilical seam of the succeeding whorl (Pl. 3, figs 3c-d). Occasional strengthened collar-like ribs are present on the test, corresponding to the site of shallow constrictions on the otherwise smooth internal mould. Middle and later growth stages (Pl. 3, fig. 2; Pl. 4; Pl. 7, fig. 2; Pl. 14, fig. 11). The expansion rate increases markedly, the umbilicus becomes proportionately smaller (34% of diameter). The umbilicus is relatively deep, with a subvertical wall and abruptly rounded shoulder. The sides are flattened and convergent, the venter arched. Ornament consists of fine, dense lirae which arise at the umbilical seam, pass forwards across the umbilical wall, shoulder and lower flank where they may branch, or where intercalated ribs may be inserted. The lirae flex gently backwards at mid-flank and forwards over the ventrolateral shoulders to form a broad shallow peak over the siphonal area. Shallow constrictions are present (? four per whorl), and each has a collar-like thickened rib parallel to it, and bearing lirae. The mould is smooth, save for constrictions. The suture line (Fig. 1) with large, incised, bifid lobes and saddles is of typical gaudryceratid type. What may be an adult of this species is represented by a partially crushed specimen SAS FB11, 140 mm in diameter (PI. 4). This shows a relative increase in whorl height and decrease in relative umbilical diameter. Ornament consists of strong wiry lirae which branch into twos and threes near the umbilical shoulder, and become very flexuous across the flanks. Discussion. The fragmentary specimen SAS Z999 demonstrates very clearly that Gaudryceras cinctum is no more than the adult of Gaudryceras varicostatum, as Spath suspected in 1922. The distinctive features of G. varicostatum are thus the Vertebrites-like inner whorls together with Sic 3d Plate 3 x 1, except Figs 3c—d Figs 1-3 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen. Fig. 1, SAS P1418; Fig. 2, the holotype, TM 538; both late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). Fig. 3, SAS Z999, St Lucia Formation, Coniacian II, Loc. 93, on farm Ncedomhlope, ESE of Hluhluwe, Zululand; Figs 3c-d x3 to show details of juvenile ornament. See also Pl. 4; Pl. 7, fig. 2; Pl. 14, fig. 11. 135 136 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER E L U, Fig. 1 Sutures of Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen. TM 538, x 74 approx. typical Gaudryceras-like subsequent ornament, which place it clearly within the group of G. mite. There are obvious comparisons with Gaudryceras stefaninii, from which this species may well be descended, but there are more constrictions and a completely different whorl section in that species. Similar features separate G. varicostatum from Gaudryceras varagurense, as does the pre- sence of more constrictions (six to eight per whorl), more evolute coiling and finer lirae in the latter. Differing relative proportions and coarseness of ornament also allow separation of medium- sized specimens from the superficially similar Gaudryceras beantalyense and G. analabense. Gaudryceras striatum Jimbo (1894: pl. 6, fig. 6) and var. pictum Yabe (1903: 33; pl. 4, fig. 6) are very finely ribbed and have many more collars and constrictions per whorl. The poorly-known Gaudryceras propemite is said to have depressed whorls up to diameters of Plate 4 x1 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen. SAS FB11, St Lucia Formation, southern part of False Bay, Zululand (precise horizon unknown, probably Coniacian or Santonian). See also Pl. 3; Pl. 7, fig. 2; Pl. 14, fig. 11. 137 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 138 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 60 mm; it is, however, probably a synonym of G. cinctum. Gaudryceras anomalum Collignon (1966 : 21; pl. 436, fig. 1891) is too poorly illustrated for comparison. OcCURRENCE. Coniacian of Zululand, and late Santonian or early Campanian of Pondoland, Santonian of Madagascar and (?) Campanian of New Zealand. Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe 1890 «Lytoceras sacya Forbes; Yokoyama: 178; pl. 18, figs 12, 13. 1903 Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe : 19; pl. 3, figs 3-4; non var. intermedia: 27; pl. 3, fig. 1 (= Gaudry- ceras denseplicatum); ? var. ornata: 24; pl. 3, figs 2; ? var. infrequens: 28; pl. 4, figs 3a—3b. 1942 Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe; Matsumoto : 667, fig. 1. 1942 Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe var. substriata Matsumoto : 666 (nom nud). 1956 Neogaudryceras tenuiliratum (Yabe) Collignon : 69. 1963 Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe; Jones : 26; pl. 9; pl. 10, figs 1-3; text-fig. 12. 21966 Neogaudryceras aff. tenuiliratum (Yabe); Collignon : 21; pl. 463, fig. 1891. LectotyPe. Designated by Jones (1963 : 28), the original of Lytoceras sacya Yokoyama 1890 : 178, pl. 18, fig. 12. MATERIAL. A single specimen, SAS Z1906, from the north-western part of the Nibela Peninsula, Lake St Lucia, Zululand, at 27° 57’ 00” S, 32° 25’ 00” E, and of Santonian age. DESCRIPTION. The coiling is moderately evolute, less than 40 % of the previous whorl being covered. The whorl section is rounded, slightly depressed during the early growth stages, becoming some- what compressed as growth proceeds. Whorls expand slowly during early growth and rapidly during middle to late growth stages. The umbilicus is of medium size (approximately 40% of diameter) with a subvertical, outward-sloping umbilical wall merging into an evenly rounded shoulder. The ornament of the early whorls is not well exposed in our specimen, but appears to consist of rather coarse, flexuous prorsiradiate lirae. There are periodic narrow flexuous prorsiradiate constrictions behind each of which is a strong collar-like rib. Lirae arise at the umbilical seam, sweep forwards across umbilical wall, shoulder and lower flank, backwards at mid-flank, and then forwards across the ventrolateral shoulders to form a broad, shallow peak on the venter. There are occasional constrictions, each preceded by a strong simple rib. Partially exfoliated areas of the specimen show that ornament was very subdued on the internal mould. The suture line is not exposed, but there is a massive septal lobe. Discussion. The finely lirate inner and coarsely lirate outer whorls separate G. tenuiliratum from members of the varagurense and denseplicatum groups. The closest species is thus Gaudryceras denmanense, known from the Campanian of Vancouver Island, Alaska and Madagascar. Juveniles of the two species are said to be indistinguishable (Jones 1963 : 28) and the only obvious difference between adults is the development of coarse, simple ribs on the body chamber of denmanense which are never as flexuous as those of fenuiliratum and do not branch. These are trivial differences, whilst the species have overlapping geographic and stratigraphic ranges; large collections may show that they are no more than variants of a single species. The position of Gaudryceras tenuiliratum vars infrequens and ornata is uncertain, as they are based on juveniles. OccurRRENCE. Coniacian to Campanian of Japan, Santonian of Madagascar, Campanian of Alaska and Sakhalin, Santonian of South Africa (Zululand). Plate 5 x1 Figs 1-2 Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo). Fig. 1, TM 551, holotype of Gaudryceras amapondense van Hoepen, Umzamba Formation, late Santonian to early Campanian, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). Fig. 2, SAS H31, St Lucia Formation, Loc. 101, Hluhluwe River, Zululand (Santonian I-III). See also Pl. 6, fig. 2; Pl. 7, fig. 1. Fig. 3 Anagaudryceras politissimum (Kossmat). SAS H202/1, St Lucia Formation, Loc. 87, False Bay, Lake St Lucia, Zululand (Santonian I-II). 139 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 140 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo) (Pl. 5, figs 1-2; Pl. 6, fig. 2; Pl. 7, fig. 1) 1894 Lytoceras denseplicatum Jimbo : 182; pl. 23, fig. 1. 1903 Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo) Yabe : 16, 30. 1903 Gaudryceras tenuiliratum vat. intermedia Yabe : 27; pl. 3, figs 1a—1b. 1915 Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo); Yabe: 13. 1920 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) amapondense van Hoepen : 42; pl. 24, figs 1-3. 19216 Gaudryceras amapondense van Hoepen; Spath: 50 (table). 1922 Gaudryceras amapondense van Hoepen; Spath: 118. 2.1924 Neogaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo) nonstriata Yehara : 35; pl. 2, fig. 1. 2.1942 Neogaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo) var. kawadai Matsumoto : 666 (nom. nud). 1956 Neogaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo); Collignon : 60; pl. 9, fig. 1. 1959 Gaudryceras glaneggense (Redtenbacher); Wiedmann : 715. 1962a Gaudryceras vascogoticum Wiedmann : 159; pl. 9, figs 2, 6; text-fig. 17. 1965b Neogaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo); Collignon : 6; pl. 416, fig. 1719. MATERIAL. Seven specimens. TM 551 (the holotype of Gaudryceras amapondense van Hoepen), TM 558, SAS P7/1 and SAM 7094, from the late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland); SAS H-30-3 from Loc. 100 and SAS H31 from Loc. 101 on the Hluhluwe River, Zululand (Santonian I-III); SAS Z1154 from Loc. 114 on the Nibela Peninsula, Zululand (Campanian II) and Z337 from the west bank of the Hluhluwe River at 28° 05’ 00” S, 32° 15’ 00” E (Upper Coniacian ?). All the Zululand material is from the St Lucia Formation. DESCRIPTION. Early growth stages, up to 60 mm (PI. 5, fig. 2). The coiling is evolute, the whorl section as high as broad, or slightly compressed, the greatest breadth being just above the umbilical shoulder. The flanks are gently rounded, converging to an arched, evenly rounded venter. The umbilicus is broad (about 50% of diameter) and of moderate depth, with a high wall and abruptly rounded shoulder. The test is ornamented by fine, dense, prorsiradiate flexuous lirae, clearly visible to the naked eye, and arising at the umbilical seam. They flex forwards over the lower part of the flank and backwards at mid-flank to sweep forwards across the ventrolateral shoulders to form a distinct peak over the siphonal region. There are periodic strengthened ribs, corresponding to shallow prorsiradiate constrictions on the internal mould, which is otherwise smooth. Later growth stages (Pl. 5, fig. 1; Pl. 6, fig. 2). At diameters greater than 60 mm, the type of ornament described above gives way to narrow, rounded, flexuous ribs which increase in strength as diameter increases. These are rather irregularly spaced, with interspaces typically much wider than the ribs themselves. The ribs arise at the umbilical seam, strengthen across the umbilical wall, are prorsiradiate on the lower flank, first sweep gently forwards, then flex backwards across the upper flank and forwards across the ventrolateral shoulder to form a strong ventral peak, where they are thickened into a lip-like process. Both ribs and interspaces are covered in fine, dense lirae, like those of the early growth stages, when shell is preserved. Exfoliated specimens or in- ternal moulds show only the strong ribs (PI. 5, fig. 2). The suture line consists of deeply incised bifid lobes and saddles, and a retracted suspensive lobe with several auxiliary elements. Plate 6 x 1, except Fig. 1 Fig. 1 ‘Gaudryceras’ sigcau van Hoepen. Lateral view of holotype, TM 560, late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland), x 2:5. Fig. 2 Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo). SAS P7/1, Umzamba Formation (Santonian III ?), Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). See also Pl. 5, figs 1-2; Pl. 7, fig. 1. Figs 3-4 Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick). Fig. 3, SAS U1; Fig. 4, SAS 57; both Mzinene Formation (Albian V ?), Mzinene River, Zululand. See also PI. 12, figs 1-3, 5-10; Pl. 13. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 141 142 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Discussion. The striking change from juvenile to adult ornament clearly separates Gaudryceras denseplicatum from members of the mite and tenuiliratum groups. Comparisons with other members of the denseplicatum group are as follows. Gaudryceras glaneggense (Redtenbacher 1873: 119; pl. 28, figs 3a—b; see also Collignon 1956: 62; 19655: 4; pl. 414, fig. 1716) is a rather poorly known European species, since re- illustrated on the basis of specimens from Madagascar. It is separated from the present species on the basis of stronger, more widely spaced, more flexuous ribs, with far more intermediate lirae. Gaudryceras lauteli (Collignon) by contrast develops only occasional fold-like ribs, and these only on the last part of the body chamber. Gaudryceras tenuiliratum var. intermedia, Gaudryceras vascogoticum Wiedmann and the crushed and poorly-preserved Gaudryceras amapondense (van Hoepen) are clear synonyms of G. denseplicatum. OCCURRENCE. Coniacian to Campanian of Zululand and Pondoland, Coniacian of Madagascar, Turonian to Coniacian of Japan, Coniacian of northern Spain. ‘Gaudryceras’ sigcau van Hoepen (Pl. 6, fig. 1) 1921 Gaudryceras sigcau van Hoepen: 9; pl. 2, figs 13-16; text-fig. 5. 1922 Gaudryceras sigcau van Hoepen; Spath: 118. 1956 Gaudryceras sigcau van Hoepen; Collignon : 170. Ho.otype. TM 560, figured by van Hoepen (1921) as pl. 2, figs 13-16. MATERIAL. The holotype TM 560 and paratype TM 561, both from the Umzamba Formation of late Santonian to early Campanian age, at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wh|Wb U TM 560 11-6 4-5 (39) 4-6 (40) 0-99 3-9 (39) T™ 561 11-1 4 (36) 4-7 (42) 0-85 4 (36) Discussion. Van Hoepen (1921 : 9) provides a detailed description of this species, which is based upon juveniles just over a centimetre in diameter. As a result of their small size, it is difficult to place the specimens with certainty in any gaudryceratid genus, or to discuss their actual position. A specimen is refigured as PI. 6, fig. 1. ‘Gaudryceras’ spp. (Pl. 12, figs 4, 11) 1907b Gaudryceras sp. Crick : 238; pl. 15, figs 4, 4a. 1907b Gaudryceras sp. Crick : 239. MATERIAL. Two specimens, BM(NH) C18271 and C18269, from the Munywana Creek, Zululand. Discussion. These two indeterminate fragments cited by Crick are here figured as PI. 12, figs 4, 11 respectively. They are generically indeterminate. Both specimens are probably of Albian age. Genus ANAGAUDRYCERAS Shimizu, 1934 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites sacya Forbes 1846, by the original designation of Shimizu (1934 : 67); subjective synonym of Ammonites buddha Forbes (1846: 112; pl. 14, fig. 9). SyNonyMyY. Paragaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Paragaudryceras limatum Yabe 1903, by original designation); Murphyella Matsumoto, in Matsumoto, Muramoto & Takahashi 1972 (type species Kossmatella (Murphyella) enigma Matsumoto, Muramoto & Takahashi 1972, by original designation). SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 143 2a Plate 7 x1 Fig. 1 Gaudryceras denseplicatum (Jimbo). SAS 337, St Lucia Formation (Upper Coniacian ?), west bank of Hluhluwe River at 28° 05’ 00” S, 32° 15’ 00” E. See also Pl. 5, figs 1-2, Pl. 6, fig. 2. Fig. 2 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen. SAS Z1157, St Lucia Formation, close to Loc. 114, SW tip of Nibela Peninsula, Zululand (Campanian II). See also Pls 3, 4; Pl. 14, fig. 11. 144 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER DrAcnosis. Medium-sized gaudryceratids in which the early growth stages showan evenly rounded, circular to depressed whorl section which may become compressed in later growth stages. Orna- ment of early and middle growth stages typically consists of very fine radial lirae, often invisible to the naked eye, and periodic rounded, collar-like radial ribs. Internal moulds are typically smooth, save for radial constrictions corresponding to the site of the periodic ribs. Ornament frequently changes on the body chamber, where constrictions become closely spaced and fold- or scale-like ribs develop between them. Suture line gaudryceratid, with deeply incised, bifid lobes and saddles and a retracted suspensive lobe. Discussion. Nomenclatoral problems associated with the erection of Anagaudryceras have been reviewed by Wright & Matsumoto (1954 : 111-113) and the interpretation of the genus is discussed by Matsumoto (1959a: 138; 19596 : 73), Wiedmann (1962a: 156-158) and Howarth (1965 : 357). The difficulty stems mainly from the fact that the type specimen of Anagaudryceras sacya (PI. 8, fig. 3) is a poorly-preserved juvenile which could conceivably be referred to a number of other genera. If current interpretations of Ammonites buddha Forbes as the adult of this species are valid, then Anagaudryceras is in our view sufficiently different from other gaudryceratids to be given generic status. If, however, this is found not to be the case when topotype material is re- described, then most of the forms described here will be referable to Paragaudryceras Shimizu, 1934. Of the most similar genera, Gaudryceras de Grossouvre, 1894, is characterized by fine but distinct sigmoid lirae or riblets which are strongly projected on the venter. Mesogaudryceras Spath, 1927, is very compressed, with flexuous lirae and no constrictions. Zelandites Marshall, 1926, is compressed with many constrictions and virtually no ornament at any stage. Kossmatella Jacob, 1907, can normally be distinguished by its smaller size and the presence of constrictions and lateral fold-like ribs throughout ontogeny. There are, however, some species with morphologically intermediate characters, which require comment. Thus ‘Kossmatella’ whitneyi Gabb (1869 : 134; pl. 22, figs 14-14b) may be an Anagaudryceras (Murphy 19675: 16), whilst Kossmatella gainesi Anderson (1938 : 153; pl. 20, figs 3-5), referred to Eotetragonites by Murphy (19676: 23), also shows features recalling Anagaudryceras buddha. Jauberticeras Jacob, 1907, has a depressed whorl section with a sharp lateral angle at some stage, very evolute coiling, slowly expanding whorls, and is typically ornamented by lirae. It is readily distinguished from Anagaudryceras (Murphy 1967c). Matsumoto (in Matsumoto, Muramoto & Takahashi 1972) has recently introduced the sub- genus Kossmatella (Murphyella), type species K. (M.) enigma Matsumoto, Muramoto & Taka- hashi (1972 : 210; pl. 33, figs 1-3; text-fig. 1), for gaudryceratids characterized by Kossmatella-like ribs on their inner whorls, relatively smooth middle growth stages, and fold-like ribs on the adult whorl. It is quite clear from the material referred below to Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes) that these same ontogenetic changes are seen in typical Anagaudryceras, and we would regard Murphy- ella as a synonym of Anagaudryceras. The currently-held view on the origin of Anagaudryceras is that it evolved from Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) during the early Albian; it is therefore of some interest that our collections con- tain large numbers of specimens of low Middle Albian age, amongst the earliest records of the genus. Eogaudryceras (Eogaudryceras) differs from Anagaudryceras in having constrictions only on the inner whorls, and lacking fold-like ribs when adult. Eogaudryceras (Eotetragonites) bears frequent oblique constrictions throughout ontogeny. About twenty-five species of Anagaudryceras or ‘Paragaudryceras’ have been proposed; the majority are listed by Collignon (1956 : 68-70), to which can be added Anagaudryceras parti- costatum Marshall (1926 : 143; pl. 20, fig. 7; pl. 30, figs 3-4), Anagaudryceras tennanti Henderson (1970: 10; pl. 2, figs 4, 7), Anagaudryceras coagmentum Collignon (1963: 20; pl. 249, fig. 1064), Anagaudryceras pulvinatum Collignon (1964: 12; pl. 324, fig. 1445) and Anagaudryceras yokoyamaiforme Collignon (1966: 12; pl. 516, fig. 2031). Many of these are based upon juveniles at the sacya stage, and their reference to Anagaudry- ceras rather than Gaudryceras is questionable; others are based upon only a few specimens, so that intraspecific variability is poorly understood. Howarth (1965 : 358) provides an excellent SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 145 3a 3b 2b Plate 8 sil Figs 1, 2, 3 Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes). Fig. 1, SAS A1402, Mzinene Formation, Albian III, Loc. 36, Mzinene River, Zululand. Fig. 2, the holotype, BM(NH) C22673, Utatur Group of Verda- chellum, southern India, figd Forbes (1846: pl. 14, fig. 9). Fig. 3, holotype of A. sacya (Forbes), BM(NH) C51067, from the same formation, also figd Forbes (1846: pl. 14, fig. 10). See also Pls 9, 10; Pl. 11, figs 1-2. 146 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER discussion of the principal ‘species’ groups, which may correspond to no more than long-ranging species. These may be summarized as follows. 1. The group of Anagaudryceras buddha, with strong, fold-like ribs on the body chamber, including: A. buddha (Forbes 1846: 112; pl. 14, fig. 9) [= A. sacya (Forbes 1846: 113; pl. 14, fig. 10)], Albian to Coniacian. A. subsacya Marshall (1926 : 144; pl. 20, figs 88a; pl. 29, figs 1-2), Campanian. A. mokharaense (Collignon 1950: 67; pl. 11, figs 1-2; pl. 12, fig. 5), Upper Albian. A. sakalavum (Collignon 1949: 51; pl. 7, figs 3-3b), Albian. A. aurarium (Anderson 1938 : 151; pl. 20, figs 1, 2), Albian. A. coagmentum (Collignon 1963: 20; pl. 249, figs 1064), Albian. A. luneburgense (Schliiter 1872 : 62; pl. 18, figs 8-9), Campanian. A. limatum (Yabe 1903 : 34; pl. 14, fig. 2; pl. 5, fig. 2; pl. 6, figs 3a—b). A. revelatum (Stoliczka 1865: 152; pl. 75, figs 3-3b), Albian— Cenomanian. A. salinarium (Douvillé 1931 : 42; pl. 1, fig. 3; text-fig. 5), Cenomanian. 2. The group of Anagaudryceras involvulum, typically compressed during later growth and retaining weak ornament apparently throughout ontogeny, including: A. involvulum (Stoliczka 1865: 150; pl. 75, figs 1-1b), Cenomanian-Turonian. A. madraspatanum (Stoliczka 1865: 151; pl. 75, figs 2-2c), Albian—Cenomanian. A. utaturense (Shimizu 1935) [= Ammonites sacya Forbes; Stoliczka 1865, pars], Cenomanian. A. pulchrum (Crick 1907b : 237; pl. 15, figs 1—-1a), Albian. A. politissimum (Kossmat 1895: 128; pl. 15, figs 7-7c), Turonian-Santonian. A. yama- shitai (Yabe 1903 : 38; pl. 4, fig. 7), Santonian. A. mikobokoense (Collignon 1956: 59; pl. 8, figs 1-1b), Campanian. A. particostatum (Marshall 1926: 143; pl. 20, fig. 7; pl. 30, figs 3, 4), Cam- panian. A. tennanti Henderson (1970: 19; pl. 2, figs 4-7; text-fig. 5b), Campanian. A. subtilineatum (Kossmat 1895: 123; pl. 19, figs la-c, 2a—b), Santonian—Campanian. A. multiplexum (Stoliczka 1865 : 154; pl. 76, fig. 1-1b), Cenomanian. OCCURRENCE. The known time range of Anagaudryceras is from Middle Albian to Maastrichtian. The geographical distribution includes Antarctica, New Zeland, Zululand, Madagascar, Angola, north Africa, France, Germany, Austria, Romania, southern India, Japan, Sakhalin, Kam- chatka, Alaska, British Columbia and California. Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes) (Fig. 2; Pl. 8, figs 1-3; Pl. 9, figs 1-3; Pl. 10, figs 1-6, Pl. 11, figs 1-2) 1846 Ammonites buddha Forbes: 112; pl. 14, fig. 9. 1846 Ammonites sacya Forbes: 113; pl. 14, fig. 10. 1865 Ammonites sacya Forbes; Stoliczka : 154; pl. 75, figs 5-7 (non pl. 76, figs 2-3, = Gaudryceras multiplexum (Kossmat). 1865 Ammonites revelatus Stoliczka : 152; pl. 75, fig. 3. 1869 Ammonites whitneyi Gabb : 134; pl. 22, figs 14-14b. 1876 Ammonites filicinctus Whiteaves : 43; pl. 2, figs 2a—c, 3. 1879 Ammonites filicinctus Whiteaves; Whiteaves : 104 (footnote). 1884 Lytoceras sacya (Forbes) Whiteaves : 203; pl. 25. non 1890 Lytoceras sacya (Forbes); Yokoyama : 178; pl. 8, figs 12, 13 (= Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe). non 1894 Lytoceras sacya (Forbes); Jimbo : 34; pl. 6, fig. 1 (= Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe). 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) sacya (Forbes); Kossmat : 119. 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) revelatum (Stoliczka) Kossmat : 128. 21897 Ammonites sacya Forbes; Simionescu : 271. 21902 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) sacya (Forbes); Anderson: 82. 1903 Gaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Yabe: 17. 1903 Gaudryceras limatum Yabe : 34; pl. 4, fig. 2; pl. 5, fig. 2; pl. 6, fig. 3. 1903 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) sacya (Forbes); Choffat : 14; pl. 1, figs 2, 3. 21906 Gaudryceras cf. sacya (Forbes); Boule, Lemoine & Thévenin : 184; pl. 2, fig. 2. ? non 1907a Gaudryceras aff. sacya (Forbes); Crick : 170; pl. 10, fig. 13. 21913 Gaudryceras cf. sacya (Forbes); Petkovié : 51; pl. 1, figs 1-2. 21917 Gaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Woods : 170; pl. 10, figs 13-13A) (= Anagaudryceras sp. nov. according to Henderson 1970: 19). 192165 Paragaudryceras buddha (Forbes) Spath: 41. 1934 Anagaudruceras sacya (Forbes) Shimizu : 67. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 147 Plate 9 541 Figs 1-3 Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes). Fig. 1, BM(NH) C78746; Fig. 2, BM(NH) C78742; Fig. 3, SAS A2118; all Mzinene Formation, Albian III, Loc. 35, Mzinene River, Zululand. See also Pls 8, 10; Pl. 11, figs 1-2. 148 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 1935 Gaudryceras choffati Shimizu : 116. 1936 Gaudryceras (Paragaudryceras) buddha (Forbes); Breistroffer in Besairie : 167, fig. 10a. non 1936 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) sacya (Forbes); Venzo: 78; pl. 5, figs Sa-Sb (= Anagaudryceras pulchrum Crick). 1938 Lytoceras (Kossmatella) whitneyi (Gabb) Anderson: 152; pl. 31, figs 1, 2. 1950 Gaudryceras (Paragaudryceras) buddha (Forbes); Collignon : 38; pl. 6, fig. 5. 21950 Gaudryceras (Paragaudryceras) mokharaense Collignon : 67; pl. 11, figs 1-2; pl. 12, fig. 5. 1953 Paragaudryceras buddha (Forbes); Spath: 10. 1953 Anagaudryceras sp. nov. Spath: 10-11. 1954 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Wright & Matsumoto: 112. 1957 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Wright : L200, fig. 230, 4. 19596 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Matsumoto : 72; pl. 22, figs 4, 5a-c. 1960 Kossmatella cappsi \mlay : 99; pl. 12, figs 17-22. 21963 Paragaudryceras coagmentum Collignon : 20; pl. 249, fig. 1064. 1964 Gaudryceras sacya auctt.; Collignon: 4; pl. 318, fig. 1351. 1965 Paragaudryceras buddha (Forbes); Thomel : 138, table 2. 1965 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Howarth: 358. 1967 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); Jones : 23; pl. 1, figs 5-7, 13-15. 1967b Anagaudryceras sp. Murphy : 15; pl. 2, figs 1, 2, 4. 19676 Anagaudryceras whitneyi (Gabb) Murphy : 16; pl. 2, figs 3, 5, 6. 1972 Anagaudryceras sacya (Forbes); McLearn: 28; pl. 5, figs 3a—b, 4; pl. 6, fig. 4; pl. 16, figs 2, 3, 4; pl. 17, figs 1-2; pl. 43, figs la—c. 1972 Anagaudryceras cf. sacya (Forbes); McLearn: 33; pl. 6, figs 3a—b; pl. 40, figs 2a-c. 1972 Anagaudryceras filicinctum (Whiteaves) McLearn : 33, 34; pl. 17, fig. 3, 4a-c; pl. 19, figs 1-2; pl. 36, fig. 2. 1972 Anagaudryceras sp. McLearn: 35; pl. 19, figs 3a—b. 1972 Kossmatella (Murphyella) enigma Matsumoto, Muramoto & Takahashi: 210; pl. 33, figs 1-3; text-fig. 1. Ho otype. Forbes’ original specimen, BM(NH) C22673, from Verdachellum in southern India, refigured here as PI. 8, figs 2a—b. MATERIAL. We have a large number of specimens: SAS A13, A1218, A1323-4, A1326-8, A1410, A1417, A1428, A1586, A1616 and BM(NH) C78719-C78747 from the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 35 and BM(NH) C78748-C78752 from Loc. 36 on the Mzinene River (Albian IIT); BM(NH) C78753-4 from Bed 11 or 12 of the Mzinene Formation, Loc. 51 on the Mzinene (Albian V) and SAS Z36 from the same locality (previous horizon unknown, Albian IV-V). BM(NH) C18140 referred to and figured by Crick (1907a) as Gaudryceras aff. sacya Forbes appears to belong to some other species (Pl. 1, fig. 9). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Bi ee sayeay} 320? 13041) 1125) 1:16 13-1 (41) BM(NH) C78742 35:8 14:3(39) -11-9(33) 1-20 16-0 (44) BM(NH) C78743 47-7 1767) 1736) 1-02 19-7 (41) SAS A1404 47-8 19:3(40) 162(34) 1-19 20-0 (42) BM(NH) C78744 50-0 18-7 (37-4) 17°8(35-6) 1-05 20:3 (41) BM(NH) C78745 51-0 20-0(39) 19-4(38) 1-03 19-7 (39) SAS A1403 55-0 22-0(40) 22:0(40) 1-0 19-4 (35) SAS A1402 79-0 31-0(39) 31-5(40) 098 29-4 (37) SAS 1218 80-5 z 30-8 (38) - 28-3 (35) BM(NH) C78746 101-0 E 378(37) 38-0 (38) BM(NH) C78747 102-0 37-7(37) 38:5(38) 0:98 36-4 (36) DESCRIPTION. Early growth stages, up to 30-40 mm diameter. The coiling is very evolute, with a slightly depressed whorl section (whorl breadth/height ratio up to 1-20), the greatest breadth being a little way below mid-flank. The umbilicus is broad (up to 44% of diameter) with a low, rounded x 1, except Fig. 1 Plate 10 Figs 1-6 Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes). Fig. 1, BM(NH) C78753, Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Loc. 51, Bed 12 or 13, Mzinene River, Zululand: x 2 to show details of lirae on shell surface. Fig. 2, SAS Z36 from same locality; Albian IV—V, precise horizon unknown. Fig. 3, BM(NH) C78745; Fig. 4, SAS A1403; Fig. 5, BM(NH) C78744; Fig. 6, BM(NH) C78743; all Mzinene Formation, Albian III, Loc. 35, Mzinene River, Zululand. See also Pls 8, 9; Pl. 11, figs 1-2. 149 Plate 11 x1 Figs 1-2. Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes). Fig. 1, BM(NH) C78747, Mzinene Formation, Albian III, Loc. 35; Fig. 2, BM(NH) C78753, Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Loc. 51, Bed 12 or 13, Mzinene River, Zululand. See also Pls 8-10. Fig. 3 Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall). UND 635, Umzamba Formation, Santonian or Campanian, Loc. 4, Sometsu Road, Durban. 150 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 151 umbilical wall, merging with rounded, convergent flanks. The ventrolateral shoulders are rather abruptly rounded, and the venter somewhat flattened. The shell surface is ornamented by very fine lirae which arise at the umbilical seam, pass straight up the umbilical wall, are markedly prorsiradiate and weakly convex across the flank, flexing gently backwards across the ventrolateral shoulder to cross the venter with a shallow broad peak. There are up to six broad, low, rounded collar-like ribs per whorl, running parallel to the lirae, and in front of each is a shallow constriction. Both collar and constriction are covered in lirae. Internal moulds are smooth, save for low swellings, corresponding to the site of collars, and shallow constrictions, rather more prominent than those on the shell surface. Middle growth stages, 30-50 mm. As size increases, the whorl section tends to become as high as wide, and as a result the umbilicus becomes proportionately smaller. The test is ornamented by fine lirae and periodic collars and constrictions as in the early growth stages, but the latter become progressively more closely spaced and distinctly flexuous. L E L U, Fig. 2 External suture of Anagaudryceras buddha (Forbes). BM(NH) C78721, x 34 approx. These changes take place at different rates and at different diameters in different specimens, and spacing of constrictions is irregular; there is thus wide intraspecific variability. Mature ornament, 50 mm onwards. Outer whorls and body chamber are ornamented by low, broad, straight, prorsiradiate to gently flexed band-like ribs separated by narrow furrows which are clearly derived from the constrictions present on early and middle growth stages. On the shell, the ribs are typically flattened, with a flattened apertural face so that they appear distinctly scale- like, whilst the whole shell surface bears fine lirae (Pl. 10, fig. 1). On the internal mould, ribs tend to be rounded and furrows broader than when shell is preserved. Ornament is, however, enormously variable. In some specimens, close-spaced regular furrows give a Kossmatella-like appearance (Pl. 9, fig. 3); other individuals show very irregular ribs, with some broad segments of almost smooth whorl between constricted areas (Pl. 10, fig. 2). Our specimens are adult at diameters of 90-100 mm, and typically show crowded, narrow flexed ribs over the last few centimetres immediately before the aperture, which is simple with a gently projected ventral peak. The suture line (Fig. 2) is deeply incised with a lanceolate ventral lobe, a large, bifid, deeply- incised first lateral saddle (E/L), a smaller, bifid second lateral saddle (L/U,), a bifid lateral lobe (L) which is shallower than the ventral lobe (E), and a retracted suspensive lobe with a large asymmetrically bifid first auxiliary lobe; the number of auxiliaries is not clear. The internal suture is not well exposed, but some specimens show a well-developed septal lobe. 152 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Discussion. Our collections are the largest known for this species; the presence of specimens with and without test, and at various ontogenetic stages, show that there is great intraspecific variability. The problems of nomenclature associated with A. buddha stem from the description by Forbes (1846) of successive ontogenetic stages of the same species under different names, Ammonites sacya for the juvenile and Ammonites buddha for the adult. Our collections confirm the view that these are indeed synonymous, but contrary to common usage the name buddha has page priority, as Breistroffer (in Besairie 1936) has indicated. There are a large number of names available for specimens at both the sacya and buddha stages, but we feel fairly confident that Anagaudryceras limatum, A. limatum obscura, A. revelatum, A. utaturense, A. choffati, A. filicinctum, ‘Kossmatella’ whitneyi, ‘Kossmatella’ cappsi and ‘Murphyella’ enigma fall within the range of intraspecific variability. The Albian species A. (‘Paragaudryceras’) sakalavum (Collignon 1949: 51; pl. 7, figs 3, 3a, 3b) differs from A. buddha in the subdued nature of the ornament of the outer whorls, together with differing proportions, which place it outside the range of variation seen in our material. It probably represents no more than the unornamented end member of variability within the species group. A further Albian species from Madagascar, A. (‘Paragaudryceras’) coagmentatum (Collignon 1963 : 20; pl. 249, fig. 1064) is probably a syno- nym of A. buddha. It was distinguished by Collignon on the basis of a proportionately lower (41 % as opposed to 46%) and narrower (40% as opposed to 44%) whorl than in the present species, a larger umbilicus (37% as opposed to 29%) and strikingly scale-like ornament. The type speci- men is a fragment only and retains its test; its ornament can be readily matched with portions of buddha variants in our collections. The same is probably true of the ill-preserved A. (“Paragaudry- ceras’) mokarahaense (Collignon 1950 : 67; pl. 11, figs 1-2; pl. 12, fig. 5). Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall) (see Henderson 1970: 18; pl. 2, figs 5, 6 and below) from the Campanian is a direct descendant of A. buddha. It shows a comparable style of ornament in early and mature stages, but the fold-like ribs of mature specimens appear to be consistently finer in subsacya. We therefore regard it as a distinct successional species, although noting that the type specimen of the Turonian— Coniacian Anagaudryceras limatum intermedia (Yabe) is morphologically intermediate, and that there may be a case for applying the name Anagaudryceras intermedia to Turonian and Coniacian forms. if these are consistently different from earlier ones. Anagaudryceras aurarium Anderson (1938: 151; pl. 20, figs 1, 2; types refigured by Murphy 19675) is a distinctive involute species, with distant constrictions and narrow collars when young, and with distant deep constrictions separating very broad flattened ribs when adult. Other Anagaudryceras species either belong to the involvulum group, or are juveniles at the sacya stage. Most of these (see Collignon 1956 : 69, sections K, L for a fairly complete summary) are too poorly characterized for profitable discussion, and their relations to species known as adults is not determinable. OccurRENCE. Middle and Upper Albian of Zululand; Middle Albian, Cenomanian and Turonian of Madagascar, Cenomanian of Mozambique, Cenomanian of New Zealand, Cenomanian to Coniacian of Japan, Cenomanian of Alaska, Albian of British Columbia and California, Albian and Cenomanian of central and southern Europe, Albian of the Balkans. Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall) (PI. 11, fig. 3) 1917 Lytoceras sp. Marshall : 445; pl. 33, fig. 3; text-fig. 4. Plate 12 x 1, except Figs 1c—d Figs 1-3, 5-10 Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick). All Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Mzinene—Muny- wana areas, Zululand. Fig. 1, BM(NH) C78782, Bed 12 or 13, Loc. 51: x 2 in figs 1c—d to show details of lirae and collars. Fig. 2, BM(NH) C78815, Loc. 65; Fig. 3, BM(NH) C78797, Bed 12, Loc. 51; Fig. 5, SAS 56, Loc. 51; Fig. 6, BM(NH) C78781, Bed 9 or 10, Loc. 51; Fig. 7, BM(NH) C78793, Bed 12, Loc. 51; Fig. 8, BM(NH) C78818, Loc. 66; Fig. 9, BM(NH) C78774, Bed 6, Loc. 51; Fig. 10, BM(NH) C78796, Bed 12, Loc. 51. See also Pl. 6, figs 3-4; Pl. 13. Figs 4,11 ‘Gaudryceras’ spp. Fig. 4, BM(NH) C18271; Fig. 11, BM(NH) C18269. Specimens mentioned by Crick (19076 : 238, 239), from Munywana Creek; presumably Albian. 153 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 154 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 1926 Gaudryceras subsacya Marshall : 144; pl. 20, figs 8-9; pl. 29, figs 1-2. 1965 Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall) Howarth : 358. 1970 Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall); Henderson: 18; pl. 2, figs 5-6; text-fig. Sa. 1972 Anagaudryceras subsacya (Marshall); Kennedy, Kauffman & Klinger: 100; pl. 3, figs 1a—b. LECTOTYPE. Designated by Henderson (1970: 18), the original of Marshall 1926: pl. 29, figs 1-2, from the Mata Series of North Auckland, New Zealand, and probably of Lower—-Middle Campan- ian age. MATERIAL. Two specimens, UND 6545 and 6546 from the Umzamba Formation at Loc. 4, Sometsu Road, Durban, and of Santonian or Campanian age. DESCRIPTION. Our best-preserved specimen is an internal mould, too fragmentary for measure- ment. The coiling is evolute, with an evenly-rounded whorl section, depressed (whorl breadth/ height ratio up to 1:33) when young, becoming progressively less depressed as diameter increases (ratio decreases to almost 1-0). The expansion rate is moderately high. The umbilicus is broad, up to 45% of diameter when young, falling to just over 30% when adult, and shallow. As in Anagaudryceras buddha, two distinct types of ornament are present. Up to a diameter of about 40 mm, the test bears fine, dense striae which sweep gently forwards across flanks and venter, as do periodic collar-like ribs, five per whorl, in front of each of which is a narrow, shallow con- striction. The mould is smooth, save for subdued collars and rather more conspicuous constric- tions. On the mould of the body chamber, ornament consists of fine, irregular, narrow, band-like ribs separated by shallow, rounded furrows. The ribs are gently flexed on the flanks and slightly projected on the venter. The transition zone between the two types of ornament is not fully preserved. The suture line is incompletely exposed, but includes a long, moderately subdivided, lanceolate ventral lobe, a large, deeply-incised bifid first lateral saddle (E/L), and a smaller, ? bifid second lateral saddle (L/U,). The suspensive lobe is strongly retracted, with at least three auxiliary lobes, the first large and asymmetrically bifid. Discussion. As noted above, the species with which Anagaudryceras subsacya shows closest similarities is Anagaudryceras buddha, from which it is descended. The inner whorls of the two species are virtually identical, but with the appearance of adult ornament, the band-like ribs of subsacya appear to be consistently finer and more regular than those of buddha. OccuRRENCE. Lower to Middle Campanian of New Zealand, Santonian/Campanian of Durban, Natal. Anagaudryceras politissimum (Kossmat) (PI. 5, fig. 3) 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) politissimum Kossmat : 128; pl. 15, figs 7a-c. non 1909 Gaudryceras politissimum Kossmat; Kilian & Reboul: 14; pl. 1, figs 7, 8. 21926 Gaudryceras politissimum Kossmat; Marshall : 145; pl. 28, figs 1, 3; text-fig. 3 (= Anagaudry- ceras particostatum Marshall according to Henderson 1970: 17). non 1938 Gaudryceras politissimum Kossmat; Collignon: 42; pl. 7, figs 2-2a (= Anagaudryceras mikobokoense Collignon). 1956 Anagaudryceras politissimum (Kossmat); Collignon : 58; pl. 8, figs 2a—c. HOLoryPe. Kossmat’s original specimen from the Upper Trichinopoly group of Varagur, southern India. MATERIAL. A single specimen, SAS H202/1, from the St Lucia Formation at Loc. 87, False Bay, Lake St Lucia, Zululand (Santonian J-II). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Holotype (after Kossmat) 89 28 (31) 33) G7) 0-85 34 (38) pncan 1956: pl. 8, \ 97 30 (1) 37 (38) 0-81 36 (37) SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 155 DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb|Wh U Collignon 1956: 59 105 31 (30) 38 (36) 0-82 3715) SAS H202/1 61-2 21-5 (35) 21-8 (36) 0-98 22:4 (37) Anagaudryceras invol- ee. (after Stoliczka) } 44-0 16-0 (36) 19-0 (43) 0-84 14-6 (30) Anagaudryceras madras- patanum (after es 30 13 (43) 12-0 (40) 1-08 10-8 (36) Anagaudryceras : yamashitai (after Yabe) } 8s se) a OO) Cie 22 (25) Anagaudryceras mikobo- ‘ koense (after Collignon) \ 2 35 (38) 39 (42) 0-9 35 (38) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is relatively evolute, about 30% of the previous whorl being covered. The whorl section is slightly compressed (whorl breadth/whorl height ratio 0-98), the greatest breadth being some way below mid-flank. The umbilicus is fairly wide (37 % of diameter), shallow, with a low rounded umbilical wall and shoulder which merge into the moderately inflated, rounded and convergent flanks. The ventrolateral shoulders are rounded, merging with an arched, rounded venter. The shell surface is not well preserved in our specimen, but appears to have borne very fine, flexuous, prorsiradiate lirae, projected on the venter as a shallow broad peak. There appear to have been four or five flexuous, rounded collar-like ribs per whorl, parallel to the lirae, and followed by shallow constrictions. The internal mould is smooth, save for the low collar-like ribs and constrictions. The suture line is poorly visible, but is made up of moderately incised, bifid lobes and saddles. Discussion. As Howarth (1965, 1966) has noted, the second species group recognizable within Anagaudryceras listed above (p. 146) includes a large number of named forms based either on juveniles or geographically and stratigraphically isolated individuals. It is thus not at present pos- sible to assess intraspecific variability nor to decide upon valid interspecific criteria, although it seems clear that Anagaudryceras involvulum (of which A. utaturense Shimizu is a synonym), A. madraspatanum, A. yamashitai and A. mikobokoense (of which Gaudryceras aenigma Haas and G. aureum Anderson are synonyms) can be differentiated from our specimen on the basis of dif- fering relative proportions, as summarized in the table above. It is clearly distinguished from Ana- gaudryceras pulchrum and A. subtilineatum, discussed below, on similar criteria, whilst A. parti- costatum and A. tennanti are based on juveniles too small for proper comparison. Our specimen thus finds its closest similarities with Anagaudryceras politissimum in terms of style of ornament and proportions, although less compressed than Kossmat’s type. OCCURRENCE. Anagaudryceras politissimum is known from the Turonian to Santonian of southern India, the Maastrichtian of Madagascar and the Santonian of Zululand. Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat) (Fig. 3; Pl. 14, figs 3, 12) 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) subtilineatum Kossmat : 123; pl. 10, figs 1a—c, 2a—-b. 1921 Gaudryceras tenuilineatum van Hoepen: 5; pl. 2, figs 7-9; text-fig. 2. 219216 Gaudryceras sp. juv. Spath: 41. 1922 Gaudryceras tenuilineatum van Hoepen; Spath: 117. 1956 Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat) Collignon : 68. 1956 Gaudryceras tenuilineatum van Hoepen; Collignon : 70. 1965 Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat); Howarth: 358. LecTorypPe. Herein designated, the original of Kossmat 1895: pl. 19, figs la—c, from the Arialoor Group of Karapady, southern India. 156 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER MATERIAL. We have five specimens, the holotype of Gaudryceras tenuilineatum TM 559, SAM 7036, a further two fragments in the Durban Museum (unregistered) and a doubtful frag- ment BM(NH) C78757, all from the late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U T™ 559 26:5 10-8 (41) 7-3 (28) 1-48 13-4 (51) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is evolute, about 30% of the previous whorl being covered, the whorls expanding rather slowly. The whorl section is depressed, the greatest breadth being close to mid- flank. The umbilicus is broad (51 % of diameter) and of moderate depth, with a rounded umbilical wall. The whorl section is depressed, evenly rounded, with a broad venter. The shell surface appears smooth to the naked eye, but is in fact covered in very fine, dense lirae. These arise at the umbilical seam, or from a point some way up the wall or flank. The lirae at first run normal to the umbilical seam, but sweep forwards across the umbilical shoulder and lower flank, are recti- radiate at mid-flank, and sweep forwards over the shoulder to produce a shallow, broad, ventral peak. There are four shallow constrictions on the outer whorl; behind each is a low, rounded collar. Both rib and collar run parallel to the lirae and are themselves lirate. U> L E | | ! ! / i Fig. 3. External suture of Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat). TM 559 (holotype of Gaudryceras tenuilineatum van Hoepen), x 74 approx. The suture (Fig. 3) consists of a quite deeply divided ventral lobe (E) with a lanceolate ventral saddle extending for half its height, a large, bifid first lateral saddle (E/L) and a smaller bifid second lateral saddle (L/U,), a lateral lobe (L) which is symmetrically bifid and shallower than the ventral lobe, plus a retracted suspensive lobe with bifid auxiliaries. DIscussIon. Anagaudryceras subtilineatum is a poorly-known species, being based upon a large fragment of an individual with a maximum whorl height of 24 mm and a septate nucleus only 25 mm in diameter. The fine ornament indicates, however, that it is clearly an Anagaudryceras. Van Hoepen (1921) separated his Gaudryceras tenuilineatum from Kossmat’s species on the basis of slightly differing relative proportions. The figures of Kossmat show, however, that proportions vary enormously with age, whilst the identical ornament of the two groups of speci- mens leads us to place them in synonymy. The evolute coiling, depressed whorl section, fine ornament and limited number of constric- tions serve to distinguish Anagaudryceras subtilineatum from species such as A. ‘sacya’ and subsacya at comparable diameters, and from A. mikobokoense, A. politissimum, A. madraspatanum, A. involvulum, A. yamashitai and A. tennanti at large diameters. The closest comparisons are clearly with Anagaudryceras pulchrum, but in this Albian species the umbilicus is proportionally SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 157 smaller, the expansion rate greater, the ornament coarser and the constrictions and collar ribs more conspicuous. OCCURRENCE. Campanian? of southern India, Santonian or Campanian of southern Natal (Pondoland). Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick) (Fig. 4; Pl. 6, figs 3, 4; Pl. 12, figs 1-3, 5-10; Pl. 13, figs 1-9) 19076 Gaudryceras pulchrum Crick : 237; pl. 15, figs 1, 1a. 1936 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) sacya (Forbes); Venzo : 78; pl. 5, figs 8a—b; pl. 6, figs 5a—b. 1956 Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick) Collignon : 68. 1964 Anagaudryceras pulvinatum (Crick); Collignon : 30; pl. 324, fig. 1445. Hootyre. BM(NH) C18266 from the ‘south branch of the Manuan Creek, Zululand’, figured by Crick (1907b: pl. 15, figs 1-1a), and of Upper Albian age. MATERIAL. In addition to the holotype, there are two paratypes, BM(NH) C18267-8, also from the Munywana, and a large number of additional specimens. SAS GSO 1-4, SAS 55-57, A3056, A3061-—2 and SAS U1-3 are from the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 51 (Albian IV-V, precise horizon unknown); BM(NH) C78774-5 are from Bed 6, C78776-7, C78779-80 from Bed 8, C78781-3 from Beds 9 or 10, C78784 from Bed 10 or 11, C78785-78797 from Bed 12, C78799-78801 from Bed 12 or 13 at the same locality (Albian V); BM(NH) C78802 from Loc. 52, BM(NH) C78803- 13 from Loc. 54 (Albian V), BM(NH) C78816, C78820-2 from Loc. 56 (Albian V), all on the Mzinene. BM(NH) C78814 is from Bed 4 of the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 64, C78815 from Loc, 65 and C78817-9 from Loc. 66, all Mzinene Formation (Albian V) on the Munywana and its tributaries. DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Paratype, ‘ ’ é ; : BM(NH) C18268 21-8 9-9 (45) 6:5 (30) ilosy2 10-4 (48) Paratype, . : : : ‘ BM(NH) C18267 34-8 14-5 (41) 11-0 (32) 1-32 15-5 (45) Holotype, . : f : ‘ BM(NH) C18266 39-0 15-5 (38) 12-5 (32) 1:24 16-8 (43) BM(NH) C78797 273 11-3 (41) 9.3 (34) 1-22 12-0 (44) BM(NH) C78793 29-0 11-8 (41) 10-8 (37) 1-1 13-2 (45) BM(NH) C78794 30:3 12-7 (42) 10-0 (33) 1-27 14-0 (46) BM(NH) C78802 44-4 16-7 (38) 15-7 (35) 1-06 17-3 (39) BM(NH) C78776 48-2 - 17-2 (36) - 19-2 (40) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is very evolute, slowly expanding, with a broad shallow umbilicus. The umbilical wall is low and slopes outwards, merging with the inflated flanks. The whorl section is depressed at first (whorl breadth/height ratio 1-5-1-3), but as diameter increases the whorls become less depressed, and eventually almost as broad as high. The venter, initially rather flattened, becomes first broadly rounded, and then somewhat arched. When well preserved, the surface of the test is covered in fine dense striae. These arise at the umbilical seam, pass slightly forwards across the wall and shoulder, and are distinctly prorsiradiate on the flanks, where they are gently flexed, forwards to mid-flank, backwards across the upper flank, thence passing across the venter with the shallowest of ventral peaks. There are four or five collar ribs and associated constrictions per whorl during the early growth stages, increasing to seven or more when fully grown. These collars are parallel to the lirae, and have a gently rounded apical slope and a steep, abrupt apertural slope, giving them a distinctly scale-like appearance. The constrictions are narrow, and both collar and constriction are lirate. The internal mould is smooth, save for periodic collars and constrictions which are broader and shallower than on the test. 6 (€ 8 a Plate 13 x 1, except Figs 6d-f Figs 1-9 Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick). All from Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Mzinene-Muny- wana area, Zululand. Fig. 1, the holotype, BM(NH) C18266; Fig. 2, paratype, BM(NH) C18267; Fig. 3, paratype, BM(NH) C18268; Fig. 4, BM(NH) C78802, Loc. 52; Fig. 5, BM(NH) C78816, Loc. 56; Fig. 6, BM(NH) C78783, Bed 9 or 10, Loc. 51, Figs 6d-f x2 to show juvenile features; Fig. 7, BM(NH) C78776, Bed 8, Loc. 51; Fig. 8, SAS VI and Fig. 9, SAS A55, both Loc. 51 (precise horizon unknown), Fig. 8 showing a well-preserved septal lobe. See also Pl. 6, figs 3-4; Pl. 12, figs 1-3, 5-10. 158 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 159 The suture (Fig. 4) consists of a large, moderately incised, bifid ventral lobe (E) with a narrow lanceolate ventral saddle extending to half its height, a large bifid first lateral saddle (E/L) and a smaller second lateral saddle (L/U,), both symmetrically bifid, and separated by a bifid lateral lobe (L) with a large, slender central foliole. The suspensive lobe is retracted, with five auxiliary saddles, the first large and asymmetrically bifid. There is a deep and narrow internal lateral lobe (1) flanked by a large lateral saddle, and a large, horseshoe-shaped septal lobe. U2 \ \ | | Fig. 4 External and internal sutures of Anagaudryceras pulchrum (Crick). SAS 56, x 7 approx. Discussion. Anagaudryceras pulchrum closely resembles A. buddha when young, but the two species can be separated on the basis of the coarser lirae of pulchrum, scale-like collars, less depressed whorl section and more evolute coiling. Adults of the two species are clearly distinguished by the fold-like ribs of buddha. Anagaudryceras subtilineatum, a close ally from a somewhat higher horizon, appears to be more depressed when young and to possess more markedly flexed lirae; it bears the same relationship to A. pulchrum as Anagaudryceras subsacya does to A. buddha. Gaudryceras pulvinatum Collignon (1964 : 30; pl. 324, fig. 1445) was separated from Anagaudry- ceras pulchrum on the basis of its Cenomanian age and differing proportions (at 48 mm diameter, Wb = 40%, Wh = 40%, U = 31%), plus a change from a depressed to a compressed whorl section as diameter increases and a consequent decrease in proportionate umbilical width; it is best regarded as a synonym of A. pulchrum. Anagaudryceras cassisianum (d’Orbigny 1850), from Cassis in the south of France, appears to be a close relation of A. pulchrum. From the figures of Fabre (1940: 15; pl. 5, figs 8, 9) this species seems to have a smaller umbilicus than pulchrum at comparable diameters (30% as opposed to over 40%), slowly expanding whorls which are strikingly depressed when young, more prominent lirae, and scale-like collars. More material is needed to determine its true affinities. OccuRRENCE. Upper Albian of Zululand; Lower Cenomanian of Madagascar. Genus VERTEBRITES Marshall, 1926 TYPE SPECIES. Vertebrites murdochi Marshall 1926. DIAGNOSIS. Very evolute, many-whorled serpenticone gaudryceratids retaining a depressed, sub- rectangular whorl section throughout ontogeny. Ornament consists of fine prorsiradiate lirae which are simple and rather prominent on the flank, dividing into many finer lirae over the venter. Internal suture with several saddles which increase in size from the dorsal lobe towards the umbili- cal seam. DIscussION. Treatment of Vertebrites has varied from its acceptance as merely a subgenus of Gaudryceras (Matsumoto 1959a) to separation as the sole member of a subfamily Vertebritinae (Wiedmann 1962a), on the basis of the presence of a greater number of umbilical lobes than in the 160 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Gaudryceratinae sensu stricto. Henderson (1970 : 22) noted, however, that forms such as Anagau- dryceras tennanti Henderson (1970: 19; pl. 2, figs 4, 7; text-fig. 5b) and Gaudryceras varicostatum (van Hoepen) (= Anagaudryceras subtilineatum Kossmat) are transitional to Vertebrites in shell form and proliferation of umbilical lobes, whilst Matsumoto (1959a : 141) noted that some juvenile Gaudryceras, sensu stricto, e.g. Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe, resemble Vertebrites in both shell form and ornament. We would also draw comparisons to juveniles of Gaudryceras stefaninii and G. varicostatum described and figured here (PI. 1, figs 2, 8; Pl. 3, figs 3a-d) in this respect. We have followed a conservative course, and treat Vertebrites as an independent genus. The only form likely to be confused with Vertebrites is Gaudryceras, sensu stricto, and the larger size of this genus when mature, its wire-like ornament in typical members and the nature of the constrictions and suture make confusion unlikely. The following species are currently referred to the genus. Vertebrites kayei (Forbes 1846 :101; pl. 8, fig. 3), Santonian, Campanian and Maastrichtian. Vertebrites murdochi (Marshall 1926 : 139; pl. 20, figs 9, 9a; pl. 30, figs 1, 2; pl. 40, fig. 3), Campanian. OccuURRENCE. Vertebrites ranges from the Santonian to Lower Maastrichtian, and its geographical distribution extends to southern India, Japan, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Madagascar, South Africa (Zululand and Pondoland), Chile, Texas and northern Mexico, California, Tunisia and Belgium. Vertebrites kayei (Forbes) (Fig. 5; Pl. 14, fig. 2) 1846 Ammonites kayei Forbes: 101; pl. 8, fig. 3. 1865 Ammonites kayei Forbes; Stoliczka : 156; pl. 87, figs 1, la. 1871 Lytoceras kayei (Forbes) Griesbach : 63. 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) kayei (Forbes); Kossmat : 124, 162; pl. 16, figs Sa—b; pl. 17, figs 2a—b. 1895 Lytoceras kayei (Forbes); Steinmann : 86; pl. 15, figs 5a—b; text-fig. 8. 1906 Gaudryceras kayei (Forbes); Woods: 335; pl. 41, fig. 8; pl. 42, fig. 1. 1907 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) kayei (Forbes); Pervinquiére : 69; pl. 3, figs 2a—b. 21908 Gaudryceras kayei (Forbes); de Grossouvre : 34; pl. 9, fig. 4. 1927 Gaudryceras kayei (Forbes); Bose: 269; pl. 10, figs 10-14; pl. 11, figs 5-10. 1956 Vertebrites kayei (Forbes) Collignon : 64; pl. 6, figs 4a—c. 21958 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) kayei (Forbes); Anderson: 182. Plate 14 x 1, except Figs 6d-e Fig. 1 Zelandites sp. 2. SAM 7100, late Santonian or early Campanian Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). Fig. 2 Vertebrites kayei (Forbes). BM(NH) C78756, St Lucia Formation (Campanian), Loc. 14, Mfolozi River, Zululand. Figs 3, 12 Anagaudryceras subtilineatum (Kossmat). Fig. 3, SAM 7036; Fig. 12, TM 559, holotype of Gaudryceras tenuilineatum van Hoepen; both from late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). Fig.4 Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat). BM(NH) C18141, Lower or Middle Cenomanian Mzinene Forma- tion, Skoenberg area, Mzinene River, Zululand. Figs 5, 7, 9, 10 Kossmatella (Kossmatella) aff. romana Wiedmann. Fig. 5, BM(NH) C78764; Fig. 7, SAS Z539b; Fig. 9, BM(NH) C78763; Fig. 10, SAS Z539a; all from Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Loc. 56, Mzinene River, Zululand. Fig. 6 Zelandites sp. 1. BM(NH) C78864, Mzinene Formation, Middle Cenomanian, Loc. 62, the Skoenberg, Zululand, Figs 6d-e x 2 to show constrictions. Fig. 8 Kossmatella (Kossmatella) marut (Stoliczka). BM(NH) C78762, Bed 12, Mzinene Formation, Albian V, Loc. 51, Mzinene River, Zululand. Fig. 11 Gaudryceras varicostatum van Hoepen. Holotype of Gaudryceras cinctum Spath, BM(NH) C19415, late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation, Loc. 1, mouth of Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). See also Pls 3, 4; Pl. 7, fig. 2. 161 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 162 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER 1958 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) coalingense Anderson: 184; pl. 68, fig. 1. 1958 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) birkhaueseri Anderson : 185; pl. 68, figs 44a. 1959a Vertebrites kayei (Forbes); Matsumoto: 141, 142, 145. 1970 Vertebrites kayei (Forbes); Henderson : 22. Lectotype. Herein designated, Forbes’ original specimen (1846: pl. 8, fig. 3), BM(NH) C51050 from the Valudayar Group of Pondicherry, southern India. MatERIAL. A single specimen, BM(NH) C78756, from the St Lucia Formation at Loc. 14 on the Mfolozi River, Zululand (Campanian). Woods (1906) records four specimens from the Umzamba Formation at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). E U, L Fig. 5 External suture of Vertebrites kayei (Forbes). BM(NH) C78756, x 15 approx. DESCRIPTION. The coiling is very evolute, with a slightly depressed, rounded to subrectangular whorl section, the greatest breadth being some way below mid-flank. The umbilicus is large (approximately 50% of diameter), shallow, with a low, rounded wall which merges into broad, rounded flanks. The ventrolateral shoulders are somewhat abruptly rounded, the venter broad and rather flattened. Ornament consists of fine, dense lirae which arise at the umbilical seam, sweep forwards over the umbilical wall and shoulder, and are straight and markedly prorsiradiate on the inner flanks. At about mid-flank they subdivide into numerous fine dense striae, almost invisible to the naked eye, and these flex gently backwards over the upper flank and then forwards over the ventrolateral shoulder to form a distinct peaked projection over the siphonal area. There are periodic narrow, rounded collar-like ribs associated with narrow but distinct con- strictions which are parallel to the lirae. The internal mould is almost smooth save for shallow constrictions of which there are at least four on the outer whorl. The suture (Fig. 5) consists of a long, little subdivided, lanceolate ventral saddle, a large, highly subdivided asymmetrically bifid first lateral saddle (E/L) and a smaller, less irregularly bifid second lateral saddle (L/U,). The ventral (E) and lateral lobe (L) are of the same length, the latter being bifid. There are three distinct auxiliaries on a retracted suspensive lobe. The first and largest auxiliary saddle is subtrifid. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 163 Discussion. Vertebrites kayei can be readily separated from the type species, Vertebrites murdochi, in that the latter species is consistently more depressed at corresponding growth stages (e.g. Henderson 1970: 22; pl. 3, fig. 1; text-fig. 5c), the whorl breadth/height ratio being up to 2:25. OccuRRENCE. This species is known from the Campanian of Zululand and the Santonian- Campanian of Pondoland. The type material, from southern India, is of Campanian age, although Kossmat (1895 : 86) records the species from Upper Santonian to Maastrichtian strata. In Chile, Texas, northern Mexico and perhaps Belgium, it occurs in the Lower Maastrichtian; Californian occurrences are of Upper Campanian to Maastrichtian age whilst there are records from the Santonian of Tunisia and an unspecified horizon in Japan. Genus ZELANDITES Marshall, 1926 TYPE SPECIES. Zelandites kaiparaensis Marshall 1926. Synonymy. Varunaites Shimizu, 1926 (type species Ammonites varuna Forbes 1846, by original designation); Hypogaudryceras Shimizu, 1934 (type species Desmoceras kawanoi Jimbo 1894, by monotypy); Anazelandites Matsumoto, 1938 (type species Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) flicki Pervin- quiére 1907, by original designation). DIAGNOsIs. Small, typically rather involute gaudryceratids, inner whorls with a rounded cross- section, but becoming compressed and high-whorled, typically with a high, arched venter when adult. Shell surface may be ornamented by fine lirae, whilst the mould bears weak to strong, straight or sinuous constrictions, the position of which may be visible on the shell exterior. Suture line with a very asymmetrical first lateral lobe (E/L) in adults. Discussion. Eleven species or varieties of Zelandites are listed by Collignon (1956), to which can be added Zelandites befamontensis Collignon (1963 : 24; pl. 250, fig. 1075) from the Albian of Madagascar, Zelandites dozei (Fallot) schroederi Wiedmann (1962a: 161; pl. 8, figs 12, 13; pl. 13, figs 3, 4; text-figs 18-20) from the Middle Albian of Navarra, Spain and Sardinia, Zelandites inflatus Matsumoto (19596 : 74; pl. 23, figs 2a—d, 3a—c, 4a—c, 5a—d; pl. 24, figs la—c; text-fig. 14) from the Cenomanian of Japan and Albian of Alaska and Zelandites perezi McLearn (1972: 40; pl. 37, fig. 1) from the Albian of British Columbia. The only gaudryceratid genus likely to be confused with Zelandites is Mesogaudryceras Spath, 1927 (type species Ammonites leptonema Sharpe 1855). This genus has distinct but fine flexuous lirae, lacking in Zelandites, and is quite without constrictions. OCCURRENCE. Zelandites is known to range from the Lower Albian to Lower Maastrichtian, and its distribution extends from northern Spain, southern France, the Balearics, Sardinia and north Africa to South Africa (Zululand), Madagascar, southern India, Japan, California, British Colum- bia, Alaska, New Zealand and Chile. Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat) (Pl. 14, fig. 4) 1865 Ammonites varuna Forbes; Stoliczka: 111; pl. 58, fig. 1. 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) odiense Kossmat : 129; pl. 18, fig. 1; pl. 19, fig. 3. 1907a Gaudryceras odiense Kossmat; Crick : 171; pl. 10, figs 14-14a. 1938 Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat) Matsumoto : 140, 141. 21942 Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat) japonica Matsumoto : 666 (nomen nudum). 1956 Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat); Collignon : 66. 1963 Zelandites odiensis (Kossmat); Collignon : 20; pl. 249, fig. 1066. HoLotyrPe. By monotypy, Kossmat’s original specimen (= Ammonites varuna Stoliczka (non Forbes) 1865: pl. 58, fig. 1) from the Utatur group of Odium, southern India, and probably of Cenomanian age. 164 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER MATERIAL. A single specimen in William Anderson’s collection, BM(NH) C18141, clearly from the Mzinene Formation of the Skoenberg area of Zululand and of Lower to Middle Cenomanian age. DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Holotype (after Kossmat) 19 6-4 (34) 8-5 (45) 0-75 4-5 (24) BM(NH) C18141 22:3 f- 212), 11-0 (49) 0-65 4:0 (17) Collignon 1963 : 20 38 14 (37) 17 (45) 0:82 11 (29) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is involute, with a small, deep, conical umbilicus (17% of diameter). The whorl section is compressed (whorl breadth/height ratio 0-65), with the greatest breadth close to mid-flank. The umbilical wall slopes outwards, to merge with the broadly rounded, flattened flanks, which converge to the high, rather narrow, arched venter. The specimen retains corroded test, and none of the original ornament remains, nor are any constrictions visible. The suture is not exposed. DISCUSSION. Our specimen is poorly preserved, but the involute coiling, compressed whorl section with greatest breadth at mid-flank, and lack of constrictions and lirae clearly place it in Kossmat’s species. Zelandites odiensis may be separated from other members of the genus as follows. Z. dozei (Fallot 1885 : 235; pl. 4, figs 3-3b) from the Albian to Cenomanian of France, Spain, Sardinia, Japan and Madagascar is a more evolute, inflated species, and bears distinct constric- tions, as does Z. dozei schroederi Wiedmann (1962a: 161; pl. 8, figs 12, 13; pl. 13, figs 3, 4; text-figs 18-20), an Upper Albian species from Spain and Sardinia, which also has an almost trigonal whorl section. Z. flicki (Pervinquiére 1907: 65; pl. 3, fig. 16) from the Upper Albian of Tunisia is more evolute, and has closely-spaced prorsiradiate constrictions which are very pro- minent across the lower flank. Z. befamontensis Collignon (1963 : 24; pl. 250, fig. 1074) from the Lower Albian of Madagascar is a less compressed species (whorl breadth/height ratio 0-92) with a subtrigonal whorl section and weak, distant constrictions. Z. busnardoi Collignon (1956: 62; pl. 6, figs 44a; text-figs 10-11) from the Santonian of Madagascar has subparallel flanks, is more evolute, and bears strong constrictions. Z. kaiparaensis Marshall (1926: 147; pl. 19, figs 9-9a; pl. 31, fig. 12; Henderson 1970: 21; pl. 2, fig. 8) from the Campanian of New Zealand and California is more inflated, with strong prorsiradiate constrictions. The presence of constrictions also serves to distinguish Z. mihoensis Matsumoto (1938 : 144; pl. 14, figs 2a—c) from the Ceno- manian of Japan; Z. inflatus Matsumoto (19596 : 74; pl. 23, figs 2a—d, 3a—c, 4a—c, 5a—d; pl. 24, figs la-c; text-fig. 14) from the Albian of Alaska and Cenomanian of Japan, and Z. kawanoi (Jimbo 1894: 281; pl. 1, fig. 7) from the Santonian to Maastrichtian of Japan. Zelandites varuna (Forbes 1846: 107; pl. 8, figs 5a—c) and Z. varuna japonica Matsumoto (1938 : 140; pl. 14, figs Sa—b, 6a—b, 7a—b; text-fig. la—d) from the Campanian—Maastrichtian of southern India, Japan and Chile (Steinmann 1895 : 84; pl. 5, figs 2a—b; text-fig. 7) are perhaps the most closely comparable species, but in these forms the greatest whorl breadth is closer to the umbilicus, whilst there are distinct lirae and constrictions which are particularly well marked on the lower flank. OCCURRENCE. Cenomanian of southern India and South Africa (Zululand); Albian of Madagas- car, and perhaps Cenomanian of Japan (Matsumoto 1942). Zelandites sp. 1 (Pl. 14, fig. 6) MATERIAL. A single specimen, BM(NH) C78864, from the Middle Cenomanian Mzinene For- mation at Loc. 62, the Skoenberg, Zululand. DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U BM(NH) C78864 PANES) 12-1 (56) 11-5 (53) 1-05 2:0 (9) DESCRIPTION AND Discussion. This corroded specimen from the same general locality as the specimen of Zelandites odiensis noted above is very badly preserved, but nevertheless retains SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 165 traces of constrictions in the umbilical region, indicating that a further species is present in the area. It is specifically indeterminate. OccuRRENCE. Cenomanian III, Zululand. Zelandites sp. 2 (Pl. 14, fig. 1) MATERIAL. A single specimen, SAM 7100 from the late Santonian to early Campanian Umzamba Formation at Loc. 1, the mouth of the Umzamba River, southern Natal (Pondoland). DISCUSSION AND OCCURRENCE. M. R. Cooper of the South African Museum has kindly sent us photographs (PI. 14, figs la—b) of a further Zelandites, from the Umzamba Formation. The whorl section and coiling recall Zelandites varuna (Forbes) although constrictions appear to be absent. Genus KOSSMATELLA Jacob, 1907 Subgenus KOSSMATELLA Jacob, 1907 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites agassizianus Pictet 1848, by original designation. Diacnosis. The coiling is moderately involute, the whorl section depressed to compressed. The flanks bear deep constrictions, between which are radial folds varying from mere swellings to massive protruberances. The surface of the test is finely lirate. DISCUSSION. Two subgenera are recognized in Kossmatella, K. (Kossmatella) and K. (Guderianites) Wiedmann, 1962, with Kossmatella costata Douvillé (1916) as type species. Guderianites is typified by the invariable presence of more than one swelling between constrictions. The subgenus K. (Murphyella) Matsumoto, 1972 (type species K. (M.) enigma Matsumoto, Muramoto & Taka- hashi, 1972 : 210; pl. 33, figs 1-3; text-fig. 1) is regarded as a synonym of Anagaudryceras Shimizu 1934. Wiedmann (1962a, b) and Wiedmann & Dieni (1968) provide an extensive review of the genus and subgenus, and the following arrangement has been proposed on the basis of ornamentation. 1. The group of Kossmatella agassiziana, with radial folds, sometimes weakly bullate, including: K. agassiziana (Pictet) (Wiedmann 1962a: pl. 13, figs 9-11), Middle to Upper Albian of southern Europe. K. romana Wiedmann (1962a: 164; pl. 8, figs 6-7; pl. 13, fig. 12; text-figs 21-24), Middle and Upper Albian of southern France, the Balearics, northern and south-eastern Spain, and possibly South Africa (Zululand). K. jacobi jacobi Wiedmann (1962a: 167, nom. nov. for K. agassiziana var. II of Jacob 1908: pl. 2, fig. 4), and K. jacobi quenstedti Wiedmann (19625 : 59; pl. 5, fig. 5; text-fig. 20), both Lower Albian of southern France and the Balearics. K. marut (Stoliczka 1865 : 162; pl. 17, figs 3-3c), Upper Albian of southern India and South Africa (Zulu- land), and the Middle Cenomanian(?) of Madagascar. K. sublaevis sublaevis Wiedmann (19626 : 52; pl. 4, fig. 7; text-fig. 17), K. sublaevis pachys Wiedmann, 19626: 54; pl. 4, figs 2, 8; text-fig. 18) and K. sublaevis involuta Wiedmann (19625: 56), all Lower to Upper Albian of southern France, the Balearics, Sardinia and Zacatecas (Mexico). K. muhlenbecki (Fallot 1885: 233; pl. 4, fig. 1), Upper Albian of southern France, northern Spain and Sardinia. 2. The group of Kossmatella ventrocincta, with strong umbilical nodes, including: K. ventro- cincta (Quenstedt 1847-8 : 223; pl. 17, figs 14a—b) and K. ventrocincta gignouxi Breistroffer (1931 : 193), both Middle Albian of southern France. K. oosteri oosteri Breistroffer (1936a: 1492) and K. oosteri passendorferi Wiedmann & Dieni (1968: 41), Upper Albian of Switzerland, southern France, Sardinia and Poland. K. schindewolfi Wiedmann & Dieni (1968 : 41; pl. 3, fig. 13; pl. 4, figs 1-3; text-figs 11-12), Upper Albian of southern France, Sardinia and Poland. All our Zululand specimens belong to Kossmatella (Kossmatella), and to the agassiziana group. OccuRRENCE. K. (Kossmatella) ranges from the ? Upper Aptian to Lower and ? Middle Ceno- manian. Its chief occurrences are in the western Mediterranean region, the distribution covering southern France, Spain, the Balearics, Sardinia, Italy, Poland, north Africa, southern India, 166 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER Madagascar, South Africa (Zululand), Mexico, California and Alaska. K. (Guderianites) occurs in the Albian of Sinai and possibly the Lower Albian of the Balearics. Kossmatella (Kossmatella) marut (Stoliczka) (PI. 14, fig. 8) 1865 Ammonites marut Stoliczka : 162; pl. 79, figs 1-1b. 1895 Lytoceras (Gaudryceras) marut (Stoliczka) Kossmat : 130; pl. 17, figs 3—3c. 1956 Kossmatella marut (Stoliczka) Collignon : 66. 1963 Kossmatella aff. marut (Stoliczka); Collignon : 20; pl. 249, fig. 1065. HOLOTYPE. By monotypy, Stoliczka’s original specimen (1865: pl. 79, figs 1-1b) from the Upper Albian of Odium, southern India. MATERIAL. One specimen, BM(NH) C78762 from Bed 12 of the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 51 on the Mzinene River, Zululand (Albian V). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U Folds Holotype (after Stoliczka) 14-0 4-8 (35) 5-5 (39) 0:88 6:3(45) 17 Kossmat 1895: 130 19-5 60(31) 65(33) 0-92 8:0(41) 17 31-1 9-8(32) 11-2(36) 0-88 11:1(36) 17/18 BM(NH) C78762 23-5 8:0(34) 8:6 (37) 0-93 9:0(38) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is moderately involute, about 50% of the previous whorl being covered. The umbilicus is of moderate size (36-38% of diameter) with a low, sloping, rounded wall, which merges imperceptibly with the flanks. The whorl section is compressed, the greatest breadth being some way below mid-flank. The flanks are gently rounded and merge, via broad, gently rounded shoulders, into an evenly rounded venter. Ornament consists of broad, band-like radial lateral folds separated by narrower constrictions; there are seventeen folds on the outer whorl. These arise as broad swellings at the umbilical seam, and pass straight across the flanks, broadening and weakening as they do so, and eventually merging with the flanks at the ventrolateral shoulder. The constrictions are narrow and rectiradiate. Most are clearly visible only on the flanks, but some continue over the venter to form a distinct peaked constriction over the siphonal area. The test surface of the available specimen is corroded, and no trace of lirae remains. The sutures are not visible. Discussion. Our specimen clearly matches Stoliczka’s small holotype and the rather larger specimen figured by Kossmat, apart from minor differences in relative proportions. When compared with other members of the agassiziana group, differences are clear, if subtle; given larger popula- tions a reduction of the large number of species names currently in use may be possible. Compari- sons are as follows. Kossmatella agassiziana itself (Wiedmann 1962a: pl. 13, figs 9-11) has rather similar relative proportions, but has fewer (12) and narrower lateral folds, which flex backwards on the flanks. K. romana Widemann (1962a: 164; pl. 8, figs 6, 7; pl. 3, fig. 12; text-figs 21-24; 19625: 50; pl. 3, fig. 8; pl. 4, figs 1, 5; pl. 5, fig. 3) is a depressed form with coarser folds and a lower expan- sion rate than K. marut—as is K. jacobi Wiedmann (1962a: 167; 1962b: 56, 57; pl. 4, fig. 4; text-fig. 19; 1962b: 59; pl. 5, fig. 5; text-fig. 20). K. muhlenbecki (Fallot) (Wiedmann 1962a: 168; pl. 8, figs 5-8; text-figs 27-29) is a depressed slowly expanding species with 15 coarse lateral bulges per whorl, and a test ornamented by very coarse lirae. K. sublaevis sublaevis Wiedmann, pachys Wiedmann and involuta Wiedmann (19625: 52; pl. 4, figs 2, 7, 8; text-figs 17-18) are slowly expanding forms, ornamented by faint, irregular bulges separated by broad constrictions. OccuRRENCE. Upper Albian of South Africa (Zululand) and southern India. Middle ? Ceno- manian of Madagascar. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 167 Kossmatella (Kossmatella) aff. romana Wiedmann (Pl. 14, figs 5, 7, 9, 10) 1962a Kossmatella romana Wiedmann : 114; pl. 8, figs 6-7; pl. 13, fig. 12; text-figs 21-24. 1962b Kossmatella (Kossmatella) romana Wiedmann : 50; pl. 3, fig. 8; pl. 4, figs 1, 5; pl. 5, fig. 3. 1968 Kossmatella (Kossmatella) romana Wiedmann: Wiedmann & Dieni: 38; pl. 1, figs 10, 11; pl. 2, fig. 7; pl. 3, fig. 10. MATERIAL. Four specimens, SAS Z539a—-b and BM(NH) C78763-4 from the Mzinene Formation at Loc. 56 on the Mzinene River, Zululand (Albian V). DIMENSIONS. D Wb Wh Wb/Wh U BM(NB) C78763 27:8 9-5 (34) 9-4 (34) 1-01 10-8 (39) BM(NH) C78764 35:0 12-0 (34) 12-0 (34) 1:0 13-5 (38-5) SAS Z539a 27:0 9-5 (35) 9-7 (36) 0-98 9-7 (36) DESCRIPTION. The coiling is evolute, about 20% of the previous whorl being covered. The whorl section varies from slightly depressed during early growth stages to slightly compressed later. The umbilicus is broad, 36-39 % of diameter, and shallow. The umbilical wall is low, rounded and gently sloping; the flanks are weakly inflated, the greatest breadth being a little below mid-flank. The ventrolateral shoulder is rounded, merging into a broad, evenly rounded venter. The flanks bear 17-19 lateral bulges per whorl; these arise at the umbilical seam, are at their maximum strength on the lower flank, declining on the upper flank, and disappearing by the ventrolateral shoulder. The intervening constrictions are quite narrow, rectiradiate to slightly prorsiradiate, and distinctly peaked on the venter; up to seven of these per whorl are deeply incised on the internal mould, although all are relatively weak where shell is preserved. The surface of the test, when preserved, is covered in fine dense lirae. The sutures are not seen. Discussion. The striking features of our specimens are the presence of strong lateral bulges, a wide umbilicus, the deep incision of occasional constrictions and the rather broad whorl section. Kossmatella marut is more compressed, with weaker bulges, as is K. agassizianum, where the lateral bulges are fewer (12 per whorl) and flexed. K. jacobi and its variety quenstedti are more inflated and more robustly ornamented. K. muhlenbecki has a markedly tabulate venter and other distinctive characters, whilst forms such as K. Jaevis and its varieties are even more distinctive, as noted above. The most obvious comparisons are thus to be made with Kossmatella romana Wiedmann. The published figures show a range of variability in specimens referred to the species; in general, specimens retaining their test have somewhat stronger lirae and coarser lateral bulges than our specimens, whilst internal moulds lack the occasional deeply-incised constrictions of our material. The Zululand specimens may represent a new species, or a subspecies of K. romana, but we would hesitate to introduce a new name on the basis of the present limited material. OccuRRENCE. Kossmatella romana occurs in the Middle and Upper Albian of France, the Balea- Tics, south-eastern and northern Spain, and Sardinia; our Zululand material is of Upper Albian age. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr H. W. Ball, Dr M. K. Howarth and Mr D. Phillips of the British Museum (Natural History), London, Dr M. R. Cooper of the South African Museum, Cape Town, General M. Collignon (Grenoble), Mr C. W. Wright (London), Professor J. Wiedmann (Tiibin- gen), Mr P. J. Rossouw, Dr C. K. Brain and Mrs E. Voigt (Pretoria); also to the technical staffs of the Department of Geology, Oxford, Geologisches Institut, Tiibingen, and Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, for their help and assistance in many ways. 168 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER References Anderson, F. M. 1902. Cretaceous deposits of the Pacific Coast. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., San Francisco, (3) 2: 1-154, pls 1-12. —— 1938. Lower Cretaceous deposits of California and Oregon. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 16. 244 pp., 84 pls. —— 1958. Upper Cretaceous of the Pacific Coast. Mem. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 71 : 1-378, pls 1-75. Anthula, D. J. 1899. Uber die Kreidefossilen des Kaukasus. Beitr. Palaont Geol. Ost-Ung., Vienna & Leipzig, 12 : 53-159, pls 2-14. Basse, E. 1928. Quelques Invertebrés Crétacés de la Cordilliére Andine. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Paris, (4) 18 : 113-147, pls 7-8. Besairie, H. 1936. Recherches géologiques 4 Madagascar. Premiére suite. La géologie du nord-ouest. Mem. Acad. Malgache, Tananarive, 21 : 9-259, pls 1-24. Bose, E. 1927. Cretaceous ammonites from Texas and northern Mexico. Bull. Univ. Tex. Bur. econ. Geol. Technol., Austin, 2748 : 143-357, pls 1-19. Boule, M., Lemoine, P. & Thévenin, A. 1906-07. Paléontologie de Madagascar. III - Céphalopodes crétacés des environs de Diego-Suarez. Annls Paléont., Paris, 1: 173-192 (1-20), pls. 14-20 (1-7) (1906); 2 : 1-56 (21-76), pls 1-8 (8-15) (1907). Breistroffer, M. 1931. Sur l’étage Albien en Chartreuse (Isére et Savoie). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 193 : 1202-1204. —— 1936a. Sur les niveaux fossiliféres de l’Albien dans la Fosse vocontienne, Dréme, Hautes-Alpes et Basses-Alpes. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 204: 1492-1493. — 1936b. Les subdivisions du Vraconien dans le sud-est de la France. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Paris, (5) 6: 63-68. 1947. Sur les zones d’ammonites dans I’Albien de France et d’Angleterre. Trav. Lab. Géol. Univ. Grenoble, 26: 1-88. 1956. In Mahmoud, I. G. el-din, Etudes Paléontologiques sur la faune crétacique du Massif du Moghara (Sinai — Egypte). Publs Inst. Désert Egypte, Mataria, 8 (1955). 192 pp., 19 pls. Bruguiére, J. G. 1789. Encyclopédie méthodique . . . Histoire naturelle des Vers 1 (1): 1-344. Paris. Casey, R. 1960. The Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand, 1. xxxvit+ 44 pp., 10 pls. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. Choffat, P. 1903. Contributions 4 la connaissance géologique des colonies Portugaises d’Afrique, I. Le Crétacique de Conducia. Mém. Commn géol. Port., Lisbon. 32 pp., 9 pls. Collignon, M. 1931. Faunes sénoniennes du nord et de l’ouest de Madagascar. Annls géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 1: 1-66, pls 1-9. — — 1938. Ammonites Campaniennes et Maastrichtiennes de l’ouest et du sud de Madagascar. Annls géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 9 : 55-118, pls 1-9. —— 1949. La faune albienne d’Ambarimaninga. Annis géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 16: 1-128, pls 1-22. —— 1950. L’Albien de Mokaraha. Annls géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 17 : 57-85, pls 10-14. —— 1956. Ammonites néocrétacées du Menabe (Madagascar). IV.-—Les Phylloceratidae. V.—- Les Gaudryceratidae. VI.—Les Tetragonitidae. Annis géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 23 : 1-106, pls 1-11. —— 1962-69. Atlas des fossiles caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites). TX (Aptien), 64 pp., pls 215-240 (1962). X (Albien), xv+ 184 pp., pls 241-317 (1963). XI (Cénomanien), xi+ 152 pp., pls 318-375 (1964). XII (Turonien), iv+82 pp., pls 376-413 (1965a). XIII (Coniacien), vii+ 88 pp., pls 414-454 (19655). XIV (Santonien), x+ 134 pp., pls 455-513 (1966). XV (Campanien Inferieur), xi+216 pp., pls 514-606 (1969). Service géologique, Tananarive. Coquand, H. 1880. Etudes supplémentaires sur la paléontologie algérienne. Bull. Acad. Hippone, Béne, 15: 1-449, 5 pls. Crick, G. C. 1907a. The Cephalopoda from the deposit at the North End of False Bay, Zululand. Rep. geol. Surv. Natal Zululand, Pietermaritzburg, 3 : 163-234, pls 10-15. 1907b. The Cephalopoda from the tributaries of the Manuan Creek, Zululand. Rep. geol. Surv. Natal Zululand, Pietermaritzburg, 3 : 235-249. Douvillé, H. 1916. Les térrains secondaires dans le Massif du Moghara 4 l’est de l’isthme de Suez... Paléontologie. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. Fr., Paris, (2) 54 (1) : 1-184, pls 1-21. —— 1931. Contribution a la géologie de Angola. Les ammonites de Salinas. Bolm Mus. Lab. miner. geol. Univ. Lisb., 1: 17-46, pls 1-4. Drushchits, V. V. 1956. [Lower Cretaceous Ammonites from the Crimea and northern Caucasus.] 150 pp., 13 pls. Moscow. (In Russian.) SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 169 Fabre, S. 1940. Le Crétacé supérieur de la Basse-Provence occidentale, 1. Cénomanien et Turonien. Annls Fac. Sci. Marseille, (2) 14. 355 pp., 10 pls. Fallot, E. 1885. Etude géologique sur les étages moyens et supérieurs du terrain Crétacé dans le sud-est de la France. Annls Sci. géol. Paris, 18 : 1-263, pls 1-8. Fallot, P. 1920. Observations sur diverses espéces du Gargasien bathyal alpin et en particulier sur la Faune de Blieux. Jn Kilian, W. ef al., Contributions 4 l’étude des céphalopodes paléocrétacés du sud-est de la France. Mém. Serv. Carte géol. dét. Fr., Paris : 229-266, 3 pls. Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the Cretaceous fossil invertebrates from southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Trans. geol. Soc. Lond., (2) 7: 97-174, pls 7-19. Gabb, W. M. 1869. Palaeontology of California, 2. 299 pp., 36 pls. San Francisco. Griesbach, C. L. 1871. On the geology of Natal in South Africa. Q. J/ geol. Soc. Lond., 27 : 53-72, pls 2, 3. Grossouvre, A. de 1894, Recherches sur la Craie Supérieure. 2, Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la Craie Supérieure. Mém. Serv. Carte dét. géol. Fr., Paris. 264 pp., atlas of 39 pls. — 1908. Description des ammonitides du Crétacé supérieur du Limbourg belge et hollandais et de Hainault. Mém. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg., Brussels, 4: 1-39, pls 1-11. Hauer, F. von 1866. Neue Cephalopoden aus den Gosaugebilden der Alpen. Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, (1) 53 : 300-308, pls 1, 2. Henderson, R. A. 1970. Ammonoidea from the Mata Series (Santonian—Maastrichtian) of New Zealand. Spec. Pap. Palaeont., London, 6. 81 pp., 15 pls, 13 text-figs. Howarth, M. K. 1965. Cretaceous ammonoids and nautiloids from Angola. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., London, (Geol.) 10 (10) : 337-412, 14 pls. —— 1966. A mid-Turonian ammonite fauna from the Mocamedes Desert, Angola. Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, 14: 217-228, pls 1-3. Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda. Jn Zittel, K. A. von (transl. Eastman, C. R.), Textbook of Palaeontology, 1: 502-604. London. Imlay, R. W. 1960. Early Cretaceous (Albian) ammonites from the Chitina Valley and Talkeetna Moun- tains, Alaska. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 354-D : 87-114, pls 11-19. Jacob, C. 1907. Etudes paléontologiques et stratigraphiques sur la partie moyen des terrains crétacés dans les Alpes frangaises et les régions voisines. Trav. Lab. Géol. Univ. Grenoble, 8: 1-314, pls 1-6. —— 1908. Etudes sur quelques ammonites du Crétacé moyen. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. Paléont., Paris, 15 : 1-63, pls 1-9. Jimbo, K. 1894. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Fauna der Kreideformation von Hokkaido. Palaeont. Abh., Jena, 6 (3) : 149-194, pls 1-9. Jones, D. L. 1963. Upper Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) ammonites from southern Alaska. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 432 : 1-53, pls 1-41. —— 1967. Cretaceous ammonites from the lower part of the Matanuska Formation, southern Alaska. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 547 : 1-49, pls 1-10. Kennedy, W. J., Kauffman, E. G. & Klinger, H. C. 1972. Upper Cretaceous Invertebrate faunas from Durban, South Africa. Trans. geol. Soc. S. Afr., Johannesburg, 77 : 95-105, pls 1-6. — & Klinger, H. C. 1975. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. Introduction, Stratigraphy. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., London, (Geol.) 25 (4) : 263-315, 1 pl., 12 text-figs. Kilian, W. 1907-13. Unterkreide (Palaeo-cretacium). Jn Frech, F., Lethaea Geognostica II, Mesozoikum, 3. 398 pp., 3 tables, 18 pls. Stuttgart (pp. 1-168, 1907; 169-287, 1910; 289-398, 1913). — & Reboul, P. 1909. Des céphalopodes néocrétacés des iles Seymour et Snow Hill. Wiss. Ergebn. schwed. Siidpolarexped., Stockholm, 3 : 1-75, pls 1-20. Kossmat, F. 1895-98. Untersuchungen iiber die sudindische Kreideformation. Beitr. Paldont. Geol. Ost-Ung., Vienna & Leipzig, 9 (1895) : 97-203 (1-107), pls 15-25 (1-11); 11 (1897) : 146 (108-153), pls 1-8 (12-19); 12 (1898) : 89-152 (154-217), pls 14-19 (20-25). Kullman, J. & Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. Paleont. Contr. Univ. Kans., Lawrence, 47. 32 pp., 16 figs. McLearn, F. H. 1972. Ammonoids of the Lower Cretaceous sandstone member of the Haida Formation, Skidegate Inlet, Queen Charlotte Islands, western British Columbia. Bull. geol. Surv. Can., Ottawa, 188. 78 pp., 45 pls. Marshall, P. 1917. Geology of central Kaipara. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst., Wellington, 49 : 433-450, pls 32-33. — 1926. The Upper Cretaceous ammonites of New Zealand. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst., Wellington, 56 : 129-210, pls 19-47. Matsumoto, T. 1938. Zelandites, a genus of Cretaceous ammonite. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 15 : 137- 148, pl. 14. 170 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER —— 1942. A note on the Japanese ammonites belonging to the Gaudryceratidae. Proc. imp. Acad. Japan, Tokyo, 18 : 666-670. —— 1959a. Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California. Part 2. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. (D) Spec. Vol. 1: 1-172, pls 1-41. —— 1959b. Cretaceous ammonites from the Upper Chitina Valley, Alaska. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. (D) 8: 49-90, pls 12-29. » Muramoto, T. & Takahashi, T. 1972. A new gaudryceratine ammonite from Hokkaido. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. (D) 21 : 207-215, pl. 33. Murphy, M. A. 1967a. The Aptian-Cenomanian members of the ammonite genus Tetragonites. Univ. Calif. Publs geol. Sci., Berkeley, 69 : 1-78, pls 1-7. 1967b. Aptian and Albian Tetragonitidae (Ammonoidea) from northern California. Univ. Calif. Publs geol. Sci., Berkeley, 70: 1-32, pls 1-5. —— 1967c. The ammonoid superfamily Gabbioceratinae Breistroffer. J. Paleont., Tulsa, Okla., 41 : 595- 607, pl. 64, 4 text-figs. Orbigny, A. d’ 1840-42. Paléontologie francaise. Terrains crétacés I. Céphalopodes. 662 pp., 148 pls. Paris. —— 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, 2. 427 pp. Paris. Pervinquiére, L. Carte géologique de la Tunisie. Etudes de paléontologie tunisienne, 1. Céphalopodes des terrains secondaires. 438 pp., 27 pls. Paris. 3 Petkovié, V. K. 1913. [Gault in Serbia.] Glas srp. kralj. Akad., Belgrade, 37 : 33-142, pls 1-8. (In Serbian.) Pictet, F. J. 1848. Description des mollusques fossiles qui se trouvent dans le Grés Verts des environs de Genéve. 1. Céphalopodes. Mém. Soc. Phys. Hist. nat. Genéve, 11: 257-412, pls 1-15. Quenstedt, F. A. 1845-49. Cephalopoden. In: Petrefaktenkunde Deutschlands, 580 pp., 36 pls (1-104, pls 1-6, 1845; 105-184, pls 7-14, 1846; 185-264, pls 15-19, 1847; 265-472, pls 20-29, 1848; 473-580, pls 30-36, 1849). Tiibingen. Raspail, F. V. 1866. Histoire naturelle des Ammonites et des terebratules suivie de la déscription des éspéces de ces deux genres recueillies dans les Départéments des Basses Alpes, de Vaucluse, des Cévennes et de la Lozére. 46 pp., 11 pls. Paris & Brussels. Redtenbacher, A. 1873. Die Cephalopoden fauna der Gosauschichten in der nordéstlichen Alpen. Abh. K.-K. geol. Reichsanst., Vienna, 5: 91-140, pls 22-30. Schliiter, C. 1871-76. Die Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 21: 1-24, pls 1-8 (1871); 21 : 25-120, pls 9-35 (1872); 24: 1-144 (121-264), pls 36-55 (1876). Sharpe, D. 1853-57. Description of the fossil remains of Mollusca found in the Chalk of England. Palaeon- togr. Soc. (Monogr)., London : 1-26, pls 1-10 (1853); 27-36, pls 11-16 (1855); 37-68, pls 17-27 (1857). Shimizu, S. 1934. [Ammonites.] In Shimizu, S. & Obata, T., [Cephalopoda. Iwanami’s lecture series of Geology and Palaeontology.] 137 pp., Tokyo. (In Japanese.) —— 1935. The Upper Cretaceous cephalopods of Japan, Part I. J. Shanghai Sci. Inst., (2) 2: 159-226. Simionescu, J. 1897. Ueber eine Unter-Cenomanfauna aus den Karpathen Rumaniens. Verh. geol. Reichsanst. (StAnst-Landesanst.), Wien, 1897 (14) : 269-273. Spath, L. F. 1921a. On Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Zululand. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Cape Town, 12 : 217- 321, pls 19-26. —— 19216. On Upper Cretaceous Ammonoidea from Pondoland. Ann. Durban Mus., 3 : 39-57, pls 6, 7. —— 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr., Cape Town, 10: 113- 147, pls 5-9. —— 1923-43. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Gault. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 787 pp., 72 pls. —— 1927. Revision of the Jurassic Cephalopod fauna of Kachh (Cutch). Mem. geol. Surv. India Palaeont. indica, Calcutta, n.s. 11: 1-71, pls 1-7. —— 1953. The Upper Cretaceous Cephalopod fauna of Grahamland. Scient. Rep. Falkld Isl. Depend. Surv., London, 3. 60 pp., 13 pls. ms Steinmann, G. 1895. Die Cephalopoden der Quiriquina-Schichten. Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paldont. BeilBd., Stuttgart, 10 : 64-94, pls 4-6. Stoliczka, F. 1863-66. The fossil Cephalopoda of the Cretaceous rocks of southern India. Mem. geol. Surv. India Palaeont. indica, Calcutta (3) 1: 41-56, pls 26-31 (1863); 2-5: 57-106, pls 32-54 (1864); 6-9 : 107-154, pls 55-80 (1865); 10-13 : 155-216, pls 81-94 (1866). Thomel, G. 1965. Zonéostratigraphie et paléobiogeographie du Cénomanien du sud-est de la France. C. r. Congr. Socs sav. Paris Sect. Sci. 1965 (2) : 127-154. SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE 171 van Hoepen, E. C. N. 1920. Description of some Cretaceous ammonites from Pondoland. Ann. Transv. Mus., Pretoria, 7: 142-147, pls 24-26. — 1921. Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Pondoland. Ann. Transv. Mus., Pretoria, 8: 1-48, pls 1-11. Venzo, S. 1936. Cefalopodi del Cretacea medio-superiore dello Zululand. Palaeontogr. ital., Pisa, 36 : 59- 133, pls 5-12. Wedekind, R. 1916. Uber Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentb/l. Miner. Geol. Palaont., Stuttgart, 1916 : 185-195, 6 figs. Whiteaves, J. F. 1876. On some invertebrates from the coal-bearing rocks of the Queen Charlotte Islands. Mesozoic Fossils 1 (1): 1-92, pls 1-10. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. — — 1879. On the fossils of the Cretaceous rocks of Vancouver and adjacent islands in the Strait of Georgia. Mesozoic Fossils 1 (2) : 93-190, pls 11-20. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. —— 1884. On the fossils of the coal-bearing deposits of the Queen Charlotte Islands collected by Dr. G. M. Dawson in 1878. Mesozoic Fossils 1 (3) : 191-262, pls 21-32. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. —— 1903. On some additional fossils from the Vancouver Cretaceous, with a revised list of the species therefrom. Mesozoic Fossils 1 (5) : 309-415, pls 40-51. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. Wiedmann, J. 1959. Le Crétacé supérieur de l’Espagne et du Portugal et ses céphalopodes. C. r. Congr. Socs sav. Paris Sect. Sci. (Dijon), 1959 : 709-764, pls 1-8. —— 1962a. Ammoniten aus der Vascogotischen Kreide (Nordspanien). 1. Phylloceratina, Lytoceratina. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, A 118 : 119-237, pls 8-14. —— 1962b. Unterkreide-ammoniten von Mallorca. 1. Liefr., Lytoceratina, Aptychi. Abh. math.-naturw. Kl. Akad. Wiss. Mainz, 1962 (1): 1-148, pls 1-10, text-figs 1-36. —— 1962c. Die Gabbioceratinae Breistroffer. Neues Jb. Geol. Paldont. Abh., Stuttgart, 115 : 1-43, 2 pls. —— 1963. Entwicklungsprinzipien der Kreideammoniten. Palaeont. Z., Berlin, 37: 103-121. —— 1973. The Albian and Cenomanian Tetragonitidae (Cretaceous Ammonoidea) with special reference to the circum-Indic species. Eclog. geol. Helv., Basle, 66 : 585-616, 8 pls. — & Dieni, I. 1968. Die Kreide Sardiniens und ihre Cephalopoden. Palaeontogr. ital., Pisa, 64: 1-171, 18 pls. Woods, H. 1906. The Cretaceous fauna of Pondoland. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Cape Town, 4: 275-350, pls 33-44, — — 1917. The Cretaceous fauna of the northeastern part of the South Island of New Zealand. Palaeont. Bull. Wellington, 4: 1-41, 20 pls. Wright, C. W. 1957. Mollusca 4. Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Inverte- brate Paleontology, L. xxii+ 400 pp. Lawrence, Kansas. — & Matsumoto, T. 1954. Some doubtful Cretaceous ammonite genera from Japan and Saghalien. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., (D) 4: 107-134, pls 7, 8. Yabe, H. 1903. Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Hokkaido. Part 1. J. Coll. Sci. imp. Univ. Tokyo, 18 (2) : 1-55, pls 1-7. — — 1915. Notes on some Cretaceous fossils from Anaga on the Island of Awaji and Toyajo in the Province of Kili. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Sendai, (2) 4: 13-24, pls 1-4. Yehara, S. 1924. On the Izumi sandstone group in the Onogawa Basin, Province of Bungo, and the same group in the Uwajima, Province of Iyo. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 3 : 27-39, pls 2-4. Yokoyama, M. 1890. Versteinerugen aus der japanischen Kreide. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 36: 159- 202, pls 18-25. Index The page numbers of the principal references are in bold type; an asterisk (*) denotes a figure. Alaska 138, 146, 152, 163, 166 numidus 124 Albian, see Upper Albian revelatus 146 Ammonoidea 123 sacya 142, 146, 152 Ammonites agassizianus 165 varuna 163 buddha 142, 144, 146, 152 whitneyi 146 depressus 126 Anagaudryceras 124, 128-9, 142-59, 165 filicinctus 146. aurarium 146, 152 kayei 160 buddha 122-3, 144, 145*, 146-52, 147*, 149*, marut 166 150*, 154, 159 mitis 128 cassisianum 159 ie, W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER choffati 152 coagmentum 144, 146, 152 filicinctum 148, 152 intermedia 152 involvulum 146, 152, 155-6 leptonema 163 limatum 146, 152 intermedia 152 obscura 152 luneburgense 146 madraspatanum 146, 155-6 mikobokense 146, 155-6 mokharaense 146, 152 multiplexum 146 particostatum 144, 146, 155 politissimum 122, 139*, 146, 154-6 pulchrum 122-3, 141*, 146, 148, 153*, 155-6, 157-9, 158* pulyinatum 144 revelatum 146, 152 sacya 131*, 144, 146, 148, 156 sakalavum 146, 152 salinarium 146 subsacya 122, 146, 150*, 152-4, 156, 159 subtilineatum 122, 146, 155-7, 159, 160, 161* tennanti 144, 146, 155-6, 160 utaturense 146, 152, 155 ? whitneyi 144, 148, 152 yamashitai 146, 155-6 yokoyamaiforme 144 Anazelandites 163 Antarctica 122, 129, 130, 146 Aptian, see Upper Aptian Barremian 122 Bulgaria 126 California 124, 126, 129, 146, 152, 160, 163, 166 Campanian 122, 138, 154, 156, 163, 165 Caucasus 126 Cenomanian 132, 152, 159, 164-6 Cephalopoda 123 Desmoceras kawanoi 163 Eogaudryceras 123-8 bourritianum bourritianum 124-5 hispanicum 124 elegans 124-6 hertleini 125 inequale 124 italicum 124 llosetaense 124, 126 muntaneri 124, 126 numidum 124 besavoaensis 124, 126 numidum 124, 126 shimizui gaonai 124-5 shimizui 124-5 skoenbergense 124-5 turgidum 124, 126 vocontianum 124 (Eogaudryceras) 122, 144 hertleini 122, 125-6, 131* shimizui 122, 124-5 (Eotetragonites) 126-44 crudus 126 duvalianum cheinourense 126-7 duvalianum 126-7 gainesi 126-7 jallabertianus 126 kossmatelliformis 126-7 plurisulcatus 126 raspaili raspaili 122, 124, 126-7, 131* Jacobi 126 shoupi 126-7 umbilicostriatus 122, 126, 127-8, 131* wintunius 126-8 Eotetragonites 124, 126-8 balmensis 128 blieuxiensis 124, 128 gardneri 126, 128 jacobi 128 jallabertianus 127-8 plurisulcatus 127-8 raspaili 126, 128 Epigaudryceras 128 Europe 122, 126, 129, 146, 152, 163, 165, 167 Gabbioceras 122 Gabbioceratinae 122 Gaudryceras 122, 124, 128-42, 144 amopondense 122, 129, 139* analabense 128, 130, 133, 136 anomalum 128, 138 beantalyense 128-9, 133, 136 choffati 148 cinctum 122, 134, 138 denmanense 129, 138 denseplicatum 122, 129, 139*, 140-2, 141*, 143* devallense 128 glannegense 129, 140, 142 hertleini 125 isovokyense 133 kayei 133, 160 lauteli 129, 142 limatum 146 mite 128-9, 136 multiplexum 133, 146 politissimum 154 propemite 134, 136 pulchrum 157 pulvinatum 159 stefaninii 122, 128, 130-3, 131*, 132*, 136, 160 striatum 128, 136 subsacya 153 tenuiliratum 122, 128-9, 138, 140, 142, 146, 155-6, 160 varagurense 128-30, 133, 136 SOUTH AFRICAN GAUDRYCERATIDAE cf. varagurense 122, 129-30, 131* varicostatum 122, 128, 133-8, 135*, 137*, 143*, 160, 161* vascogoticum 129, 140, 142 vertebratum 133 yokoyamaiforme 128 (Paragaudryceras) buddha 148 mokharaense 148 “Gaudryceras’ sigcau 122, 141* 142 spp. 142, 153* Gaudryceratidae 122-3 Hemigaudryceras 128 Hypogaudryceras 163 India 129-30, 146, 155, 157, 160, 163-6 Introduction 122 Japan 129, 138, 146, 152, 160, 163-4 Jaubertella 122 Jauberticeras 122, 144 Kossmatella 165-7 agassiziana 166-7 cappsi 148, 152 costata 165 enigma 142, 144, 148 gainesi 144 Jacobi jacobi 165-6 quenstedti 165, 167 laevis 167 marut 122, 161*, 165-7 muhlenbecki 165-7 oosteri oosteri 165 passendorferi 165 aff. romana 122, 161*, 165-6, 167 schindewolfi 165 sublaevis involuta 165-6 sublaevis 165-6 ventrocincta 165 gignouxi 165 whitneyi 144, 148, 152 (Guderianites) 165 (Kossmatella) marut 166 (Murphyella) enigma 142, 144, 148 Kossmatellinae 122 Lytoceras 152 denseplicatum 140 kayei 160 sacya 138, 146 (Gabbioceras) wintunium 125 (Gaudryceras) amapondense 140 birkhaueseri 162 coalingense 162 denmanense 128 flicki 163 kayei 160 marut 166 odiense 163 politissimum 154 revelatum 146 sacya 146, 148, 157 stefaninii 130 subtilineatum 155 varagurense 129 varicostatum 134 (Kossmatella) whitneyi 148 (Tetragonites) depressus 126 Lytoceratacae 122 Lytoceratida 123 Maastrichtian 122, 129, 146, 155, 160, 163 173 Madagascar 122, 124, 126-7, 129-30, 138, 146, 152, 155, 159, 160, 163-4, 166 Mediterranean 124, 126-7, 165 Mesogaudryceras 122, 128-9, 144, 163 Middle Albian 122, 126-7, 146, 152, 167 Murphyella 142 Natal 154, 157 Neogaudryceras 128 denseplicatum 140 tenuiliratum 138 New Zealand 129, 146, 152, 154, 160, 163 Paragaudryceras 129, 142, 144 buddha 146, 148 coagmentum 148 Pseudogaudryceras 128 Santonian 138, 154-5, 157, 160, 163-4 Tetragonitaceae 122-3 Tetragonitidae 122, 124 Tetragonites 126 depressus 126 duyali 127 Turonian 130, 152, 155 Upper Albian 122, 124, 129, 152, 159, 166 Upper Aptian 122, 124, 126-7, 165 Varunaites 163 Vertebrites 122, 129, 159-63 kayei 122, 160-3, 161* murdochi 159-60, 163 Vertebritinae 122 Zelandites 144, 161*, 163-5 befamontensis 163-4 busnardoi 164 dozei 163-4 schroederi 163—4 flicki 164 inflatus 163—4 kaiparaensis 163-4 kawanoi 164 174 W. J. KENNEDY & H. C. KLINGER mihoensis 164 varuna 164 odiensis 122, 161*, 163-4 Japonica 164 perezi 163 spp. 164-5 Accepted for publication 26 September 1977 —_—_ -_ _ 7 oy nt, ae a, =r ~~ oo ee ee VS i a a British Museum (Natural History) Monographs & Handbooks The Museum publishes some 10-12 new titles each year on subjects including zoology, botany, palaeontology and mineralogy. Besides being important reference works, many, particularly among the handbooks, are useful for courses and students’ background reading. Lists are available free on request to: P 7 4 Publications Sales . British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Standing orders placed by educational institutions earn a discount of 10% off our published price. Titles to be published in Volume 31 Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. By J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson. a F i vy mg Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. By W. J. Kennedy & H.C. Klinger. Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. By R. Watkins. The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian). By C. W. Wright. The entire Geology series is now available Type set by John Wright & Sons Ltd, Bristol and Printed by Henry Ling Ltd, Dorchester Siglo anos, Bulletin of the ce British Museum (Natural History) Benthic community organization in the _ Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland R. Watkins | Geology series Vol 3l No3 26 April 1979 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about — four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. Subscription orders and enquiries about back issues should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) © Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1979 ISSN, 0007-1471 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD ¥ = | ee ; : 4 Geology series A Vol 31 No 3 pp 175-280 Issued 26 April 1979 Benthic community organization in the \ Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland R. Watkins . P.O. Box 469, Bella Vista, California 96008, U.S.A. Contents Synopsis. ; 5 ‘ : ; . ; 3 ; , 5 ‘ 175 Introduction ; , ‘ , . : : j : : , F 176 Methods. ‘ ‘ : ; : ‘ : 3 ‘ é : , 176 Stratigraphy , ; ; ‘ ; 3 A : . : ‘ ; 179 Sedimentology . ; : : : , j : : P : ; 182 Shell occurrence . : ‘ ; i : ‘ ‘ ; ; ‘ 3 194 Analysis of shell transport . ; i ; : : : ‘ ; . 200 Community definition . 3 : ; ; : ‘ é ; : ‘ 208 Glassia obovata Association . é : ; F ‘ ‘ : F 210 Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association ’ ‘ : : é ; ; 224 Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association ; : ; : ‘ : : ‘ 228 Atrypa reticularis — coral Association : : P ‘ ; ; : ; 231 Shaleria ornatella Association F : F d 3 : ; : , 234 Protochonetes ludloviensis Association . 3 ; : : ; ; ; 237 The stratigraphic pattern of Ludlow communities . : : . i : 239 Trends in species diversity . : : ; ‘ : 240 A stratigraphic consideration of opportunistic species ‘ i i ‘ : 242 Faunal destructions in Ludlow communities . F ; ‘ : j 5 244 Stratigraphic variation within communities ‘ ‘ 5 : ‘ : : 246 Biotic interaction in Ludlow communities 5 : ; j ; : : 249 Were Silurian communities depth-related ? . ; : ‘ ; 250 Summary and implications of Ludlow community organization : é ; : 251 Acknowledgements ; : A ' é ; é pi 258 Appendix 1. Location of measured Rections : ; ; : : ; : 258 Appendix 2. Reliability of faunal Saag : r ; ; ; : A 260 Appendix 3. Faunal lists F : : ; j : : : ; 262 References . : : ; - : A ‘ , ;: 3 : ‘ 274 Index 3 . ‘ ; , ‘ ; : , A ‘ ; ; Pf] Synopsis Five areas of the Ludlow Series in the Welsh Borderland have been studied by quantitative, stratigraphic sampling to determine community organization on an Upper Silurian shelf. Measured sections show an ordered succession of predominantly terrigenous facies, with an environmental gradient of general shallowing, increasing grain size, decreasing clay content, decreasing bioturbation, and increase in storm- deposited beds of laminated silt and shells. This sequence is interrupted by low energy, back-barrier carbonates in the Upper Bringewood Beds. Shell transport occurred commonly during deposition of proximal shelf silts, and was related to a storm-generated, suspension type of movement which did not contribute to shell breakage or abrasion. Sorting of epifaunal brachiopods into concentrated layers is the most significant, taphonomic effect of transport. Stratigraphic profiles of fauna, based on continuous series of samples at 1 m vertical intervals, are used to define six communities in measured sections, dominated by articulate brachiopods, bryozoa, molluscs and trilobites. Substrate sedimentation processes and hydrographical history of the depositional area were important factors influencing Ludlow shelf faunas, and an overall control by the physical environment appears to have shaped community organization. Decline in species diversity, increase in opportunistic species and changes in faunal composition occur along the distal to proximal shelf gradient in Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 31 (3): 175-280 Issued 26 April, 1979 175 176 R. WATKINS stratigraphic sections. These changes correlate with increased rates of sedimentation and frequency of storm-sedimentation events. Trophic structures in Ludlow shelf communities appear to have been rela- tively simple, dominated by low level suspension feeding and deposit feeding at the same sites. Encrusta- tion of shells and rare predatory borings are the only preserved evidence of biotic interaction. During intervals of environmental constancy, stratigraphic variation occurs within communities, but results in no biologically controlled or directional trends. In proximal shelf environments, intracommunity variation is extreme and unpredictable, but in distal shelf environments, predictable cycles in abundance of particular species occur in vertical intervals of several metres. Intracommunity variation in distal shelf environments does not conform to models of ecological succession, is not accompanied by any sediment- ary changes, and is not affected by benthic faunal destructions represented by bentonites. A model of pelagic environmental effects upon larval recruitment is the best explanation for the phenomenon. Number and discreteness of Ludlow shelf communities, as well as diversity, population strategies and faunal composition were primarily controlled by the physical environment, and the major faunal patterns in stratigraphic sections are products of the environmental history of the depositional area. Variation within particular communities and within particular habitats is superimposed upon these patterns, and is probably related mainly to pelagic effects upon larvae, with a large random component. A consequence of this simple, physically-controlled community structure is quantitative stability of composition and diversity in terrigenous shelf communities from at least early Silurian until early Devonian times. There is no evidence for “biological accommodation’, or progressive niche-partitioning, in Silurian communities of stable, distal shelf environments. Introduction This study is a quantitative, stratigraphic analysis of community organization in marine bottom faunas in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. The Ludlow of this area is a sequence of dominately terrigenous strata deposited under open marine, shelf conditions. It is the uppermost division of Murchison’s original Silurian System, and has been intensively studied by palaeon- tologists and stratigraphers for the past 140 years. Lawson (1975) has reviewed earlier work, and given an important preliminary account of ecological divisions in the Ludlow fauna. In contrast to previous studies of Silurian palaeoecology in the Welsh Borderland, such as Hancock, Hurst & Fiirsich (1974), the environmental analysis in this report is established in- dependently of faunal data. Sedimentological study of selected measured sections has been used to establish physical, environmental gradients. The vertical sequence of Ludlow terrigenous sediments is considered as a cross-section from distal to proximal shelf depositional environments (Walther 1894: 979). Physical sedimentary effects were far more important in determining com- munity patterns in Silurian shelf faunas than previous studies would indicate. Stratigraphic patterns of fauna in Ludlow sections have been described with closely spaced quantitative samples. Detailed faunal data have been derived from this sampling, and these data are related to the sedimentary-environmental gradients observed in sections. The work is not intended to provide complete areal coverage of the Welsh Borderland, or define any standard bathymetric sequence of Ludlow communities; instead, its primary purpose is a consideration of biological and environmental aspects of community organization in selected measured sections of shelf sediments. Stratigraphic patterns in fauna within measured sections show both between and within habitat components, involving directional trends along environmental gradients and non-directional fluctuations. As a matter of convenience, these patterns are described as six named ‘Associations’ of species. In the concluding parts of this report, the faunal and environmental data are compared with models of ecological organization, which consider aspects of biotic interaction, environmental response and ecological succession in marine communities. This comparison establishes some of the important biological and environmental aspects of Ludlow community organization in the Welsh Borderland, and has general applicability to Silurian shelf faunas. Methods Stratigraphic sections Fig. 1 shows the five areas in the Welsh Borderland where stratigraphic sections were measured. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 177 [ | BASIN SEDIMENTS E=| SHELF SEDIMENTS Current Directions MEASURED SEC GON S: Millichope Ludlow Woodbury Ledbury Perton 10 20KM —— Fig. 1 Ludlow outcrop of Wales and the Welsh Borderland, showing the location of study areas. Isopachytes and current directions are adapted from Holland & Lawson (1963). 178 R. WATKINS These areas were selected to obtain detailed coverage of a particular part of the Ludlow shelf deposits, and do not record the full complexity of Ludlow faunas and sediments in the Welsh Basin. Because of limited outcrop in most areas, many small, isolated sections had to be measured to obtain a composite record of the succession. The 27 separate sections are shown in Fig. 2, and their locations are described in Appendix 1, p. 258). Sections were measured directly with tape, and the sequence and thickness of all sedimentation units recorded to the nearest cm. The principal sedimentation units recorded were bioturbated sediment, simple laminated beds, amalgamated laminated beds, bentonites and shell beds or layers. Textures were qualitatively noted in the field, and checked in the laboratory with thin sections of representative samples. Over 100 saw-cut slabs were prepared for observation of sedimentary structures. Sampling of fauna The purpose of palaeontological sampling was to produce a quantitative faunal profile of each stratigraphic section, based on numerous equally-spaced sampling points. Bulk rock was collected, and not individual fossils. In each section, the samples of bulk rock were taken at distances as near as possible to 1 m apart stratigraphically. Closer sample spacing was used in a few sections to study small-scale ecological phenomena, and wider spacing was necessary where rock could not be removed from sheer faces of large quarries. The 1 m spacing distance governed the location of samples, and not the presence of abundant or well-preserved fossils. This practice was modified, however, in the lowest Lower Leintwardine Beds of Woodbury and Perton Quarries, where fossils are very rare except in transported shell layers. The stratigraphic thicknesses of bulk rock samples are given in Appendix 3, p. 268. These ranged generally from 1 to 20 cm, and most samples were about 4000 cm? in volume. No attempt was made to standardize sample volumes, however, and density was not the basis for palaeont- ological quantification. Most samples were taken from a single sedimentation unit. The samples of bulk rock were split along fissile surfaces parallel to bedding, and all observed macrofossils were counted. One hundred and twenty-two samples were prepared in the field with hammer and chisel. These samples were restricted to low-diversity faunas of the Whitcliffe Beds, Leintwardine Beds and Upper Bringewood Beds, and were made only after eight months of labora- tory work on similar samples, in which a thorough familiarity with species was obtained. The remaining 295 samples were processed in the laboratory with a mechanical rock splitter. Most fossils were decalcified with dilute hydrochloric acid to obtain internal and external moulds. Palaeontological quantification Because of the variation in sedimentary facies and probable rates of deposition in Ludlow shelf deposits, volumetric densities of fossils are not reliable for sample comparisons. In this study the basis for standardizing and comparing the faunal content between samples is relative abundance. Relative abundances were calculated within each sample for each taxonomic category under con- sideration (usually species). The relative abundance of a taxon is defined as the number of indi- viduals of the taxon divided by the total number of individuals within the sample, expressed as a percentage. These percentages are plotted along stratigraphic columns in the sections on com- munity definition, pp. 213-221, and form the primary basis for community analysis. Arbitrary criteria were defined for recording over 33 000 ‘individuals’ from the measured sections. The purpose of these criteria was consistency in quantification of samples, and not an absolute determination of the biological equivalence of different groups. Individuals were counted directly for gastropods, tentaculitids, cornulitids, annelids, hyolithids and solitary corals. Individuals were arbitrarily defined for other groups, as follows. Brachiopods: number of individuals of a species = articulated shells + maximum number of either pedicle or brachial valves + half the number of indeterminate single valves. Bivalves: individuals counted as for brachiopods, except that maximum number of either right or left valves was used. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 179 Cephalopods : These fossils are preserved as phragmocones, body chambers, fragments of either, or isolated cameral and septal moulds. All pieces were scored as 1 individual, and as 2 or fewer specimens were encountered in most samples, this did not greatly exaggerate their abundance. Trilobites: The individuals per species in each sample were counted as the number of pygidia present, or if no pygidia but other elements were present, as 1 individual. Trilobites are suf- ficiently rare for this method not to exaggerate their abundance in most samples. Bryozoa: Number of individuals were defined as the number of separate bryozoan pieces observed macroscopically in each sample. No attempt was made to distinguish separate species within this phylum. Globular and encrusting bryozoa are usually preserved intact, so that ‘indi- viduals’ are direct counts of colonies. Ramose forms are usually fragmented, and the number of individuals counted is partly an effect of the degree of fragmentation. Tabulates: Number of individuals was counted as number of colonies within a sample. Variable numbers of individuals were obtained in each sample, as indicated in Appendix 3. A detailed evaluation of the reliability of sampling, based on the number of individuals per sample, is given in Appendix 2, p. 260. Diversity was measured within each faunal sample as the number of species obtained at a sample size of 50 individuals. This measurement was made by direct count of species in samples containing 50 individuals, and by application of the rarefaction method of Sanders (1968) to samples of larger size. Deposition of data and collections Only a limited amount of quantitative faunal data is presented here; full data have been deposited in the Palaeontology Library of the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 SBD, as discussed in Appendix 3. The collections of brachiopods, cephalopods and en- crinurid trilobites, representing about 85 % of total collections, have also been deposited in the Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History); specimens of other groups are deposited in the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, Calif., U.S.A. Stratigraphy Stratigraphic classification of the measured sections The stratigraphic units represented by measured sections are shown in Fig. 2, using the classifi- cation of Holland, Lawson & Walmsley (1963). Working in the type area around the town of Ludlow, these authors defined nine stratigraphic divisions. termed ‘Beds,’ within the Ludlow Series. They stated (1963 : 114) that ‘the divisions have been mapped mainly on the basis of their faunal assemblages but lithological characteristics have also proved very helpful in their identifi- cation.” In the present study, faunal criteria have been used to recognize the divisions outside of their type sections, and the pertinent data are contained in stratigraphic profiles of fauna pre- sented in the community definition section, p. 208, as well as Appendix 3. These criteria followed the descriptive characteristics of the divisions given by Holland et al. (1963), with the exceptions noted below. The basal division of the Ludlow Series, the Lower Elton Beds, is not considered in this study. A recent account of its stratigraphical palaeoecology has been given by Hurst (1975a). Recognition of the Lower and Upper Bringewood Beds The stratigraphical position of the Bringewood Beds in the Ludlow succession is shown in Fig. 2. Although most authors have recognized a division into Lower and Upper Bringewood Beds throughout the Welsh Borderland, there has been little consistency of usage east of the type area at Ludlow. This section will define the way these stratigraphic divisions are recognized here. Within the type area near Ludlow, Holland et al. (1963) defined the Upper Bringewood Beds as a silty limestone gradationally overlying calcareous siltstone of the Lower Bringewood Beds. 180 R. WATKINS These authors gave full faunal lists for each division; the fauna of the Lower Bringewood Beds corresponds to the Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association of this report. The Upper Bringe- wood Beds in the type area also contain the M. Jaevigata Association, and are faunally distin- guished from the Lower Bringewood Beds by the presence of Kirkidium knightii and large tabulate corals (Holland ef al. 1963). This same faunal distinction applies to the Leintwardine and Ay- mestrey areas west of Ludlow, the main difference being that Kirkidium and corals locally constitute most of the fauna of the Upper Bringewood Beds (Whitaker 1962; Lawson 1973a). WHITCLIFFE BEDS seo UPPER, LEINTWARDINE, BEDS LOWER LEINTWARDINE BEDS UPPER BRINGEWOOD BEDS LOWER BRINGEWOOD BEDS v ® 2 K e % a 9 or UPPER ELTON BEDS MIDDLE ELTON BEDS EE coginoid Siltstone Facies =] Mudstone Facies E] calcisiltite Facies E4 ‘Aymestry Limestone’ Facies = Laminated Shale Facies Bloturbated Siltstone Facies DESIGNATION OF 4A MEASURED SECTION Fig. 2 Stratigraphic summary of the measured sections. Numbers refer to map locations in Fig. 1; detailed locality descriptions of each section are given in Appendix 1, p. 258. A complete sequence of all Ludlow stratigraphic units is present in every area, but only those intervals which were observed are shown. The left portion of each column indicates benthic communities as follows: Pl — Protochonetes ludloviensis Association; O — Shaleria ornatella Assoc.; Sw — Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Assoc.; A — Atrypa reticularis — coral Assoc.; Ml — Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Assoc.; tr — transitional fauna; Go — Glassia obovata Assoc. These relations are compared in Table | to the succession of Bringewood faunas east of Ludlow. At Woodbury Quarry and in the Perton area (Fig. 1), the M. /aevigata Association is overlain by the lower phase of the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association, which is in turn succeeded by the Atrypa reticularis — coral Association. The two lower faunas occur in calcareous siltstone, and the upper fauna in silty limestone, although both lithologies are highly gradational. Graphic charts of the species ranges which define these associations are given in Figs 17 (pp. 214-5) and 20 (p. 218), and full faunal lists are given in Appendix 3. For the purpose of this report, the Lower Bringewood Beds in these areas are defined as the M. Jaevigata Association and lower phase of the S. wilsoni Association, and the Upper Bringewood Beds are defined as the Atrypa reticularis — coral Association. This usage differs from that of previous workers in the Woodbury and Perton areas. In the Perton Lane section, Squirrell & Tucker (1960) drew a boundary between their Lower Sleaves Oak Beds and Upper Sleaves Oak Beds at an interval which falls in the middle of section 5E of the BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 181 present report (Fig. 2). This boundary was later redefined, with the Sleaves Oak Beds as the boundary between the Lower Bringewood Beds and Upper Bringewood Beds (Curtis et al. 1967). It falls within the lower phase of the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association and does not correspond to the boundary of Lower and Upper Bringewood Beds recognized here. Table 1 The definition of Lower and Upper Bringewood Beds followed in this report. The distinction of these units in the Woodbury Quarry, Ledbury and Perton areas differs from that of previous authors. In section 4B near Ledbury, Penn et a/. (1971) placed the boundary of Leintwardine and Bringewood Beds between faunas here called the lower phase of the .S. wilsoni Association and the M. laevigata Association. At Perton, Curtis et al. (1967) placed the boundary of Lower and Upper Bringewood Beds within the lower phase of the S. wilsoni Association in section 5E Leintwardine and Ludlow area Woodbury Quarry, Ledbury Aymestrey areas (type sections) and Perton areas Lower upper phase of Sphaeri- upper phase of Sphaeri- upper phase of Sphaeri- Leintwardine — rhynchia wilsoni rhynchia wilsoni rhynchia wilsoni Beds Association Association Association Upper locally abundant Mesopholidostophia Atrypa reticularis — Bringewood Kirkidium knightii laevigata Association coral Association Beds and tabulate corals with few Kirkidium knightii and tabulates lower phase of Lower Mesopholidostrophia Mesopholidostrophia Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Bringewood laevigata Association laevigata Association Association Beds Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association Two areas of Bringewood Beds were studied near Ledbury, section 4A, at the north end of Frith Wood, and section 4B, near Knapp Lane (see detailed locations in Appendix 1). The inter- vening area is poorly exposed and structurally complex (Phipps & Reeve 1969), and super- positional relations of the sections have been established on faunal grounds (Fig. 2). In section 4A, the Bringewood Beds consist of silty, nodular limestone containing the A. reticularis — coral Association. These strata are assigned to the Upper Bringewood Beds, and are overlain by the Lower Leintwardine Beds. In section 4B, the Bringewood Beds consist of silty and argillaceous limestones bearing the M. laevigata Association in their lower portion, and the lower phase of the S. wilsoni Association at their top. Both faunas are assigned to the Lower Bringewood Beds, and a detailed profile of the section is shown in Fig. 19, p. 217. However, Penn et a/. (1971 : 19) assigned strata at the top of this section, bearing the S. wilsoni Association, to the ‘basal Leintwardine Beds’. Although ecologically similar to the fauna of the Lower Leintwardine Beds, the fauna at the top of section 4B includes Dalejina hybrida, Strophonella euglypha, Mesopholidostrophia laevigata, Gypidula lata, Eospirifer radiatus and Dalmanites myops, which are more characteristic of the Bringewood Beds. Synchrony of Ludlow stratigraphic divisions Holland et al. (1963) and most subsequent authors have considered their nine stratigraphic divisions as valid units of time for Ludlow shelf deposits of the Welsh Borderland. Lawson (1975) has noted that while most of the stratigraphic ranges of Ludlow benthic invertebrates are under facies control, the synchrony of the stratigraphic divisions is supported by graptolite evidence. These conclusions are also upheld by the ecological analysis presented in this report. Following the concept of ‘causal biostratigraphy’ (Krassilof 1974), two community phenomena in Ludlow shelf sections can be explained ecologically only if they are considered synchronous. The first of 182 R. WATKINS these is the Upper Bringewood fauna, in which the restricted Atrypa reticularis — coral Association appears as a stratigraphic anomaly in inner shelf sections. This fauna can be accounted for as having occupied some sort of restrictive, back-barrier environment. There is only one interval in sections at the shelf edge area which includes barrier-type deposits, and this is the Upper Bringe- wood Beds containing ‘banks’ of Kirkidium and large corals. Synchrony of the Upper Bringewood Beds between these areas (as redefined in this report) is therefore highly likely. The second synchronous ecologic phenomenon is the appearance of the distinctive fauna of the Upper Leintwardine Beds, which occupies only 1-5 m of strata in the Welsh Borderland, but occurs across the whole of the shelf area (Lawson & Straw 1956; Holland ef al. 1963). This appearance involves the very short-lived colonization of proximal shelf deposits by forms from quiet-water, distal shelf communities. It can be explained ecologically only by brief, synchronous changes in shelf-wide current patterns controlling larval dispersal. Both of these ecological phenomena and their causal explanations are discussed more fully on pp. 231-237. The stratigraphic position of the Upper Bringewood Beds and Upper Leintwardine Beds is shown in Fig. 2. The Middle Elton Beds, lower in the sequence, can be considered as synchronous across the Welsh Borderland by their content of nilssoni Zone and scanicus Zone graptolites (Holland et al. 1963, 1969; Shergold & Shirley 1968). From Fig. 2, it can be seen that synchrony of these three units effectively brackets the Ludlow shelf sequence, indicating a syn- chrony for each of the units between. Sedimentology Distinction of Ludlow basin and shelf The Ludlow sediments of Wales and the Welsh Borderland form two environmental complexes, a basin facies to the west, and a shelf facies to the east (Fig. 1). Basin deposits range from 500 to Ludlow — 36KM — Perton UPPER WHITCLIFFE BEDS LOWER WHITCLIFFE BEDS UPPER LEINTWARDINE _B. LOWER LEINTWARDINE BEDS UPPER ELTON BEDS laminated shale MIDDLE ELTON BEDS Eh] Aymestry Limestone’ faces Fig. 3 Generalized cross-section showing stratigraphic relationships of the sedimentary facies described in the text. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 183 over 1600 m thick (Holland & Lawson 1963). They consist of laminated siltstone and mudstone, siltstone and shelly turbidites, and common slumped masses of beds (Cummins 1959, 1969; Bailey 1964, 1969). The basin-shelf margin lay along the line of the Church Stretton fault, as indicated by rapid increase in sedimentary thickness to the west and westward orientation of slump directions (Holland & Lawson 1963; Bailey 1969). Cummins (1959) showed a direction of turbidite transport from the south in central Wales and from the south and west in north Wales (Fig. 1). Graptolites are most diverse throughout the Ludlow Series in Clwyd or north central Wales, indicating open-ocean connections along the north of the basin (Wood 1900; Warren 1971; Holland & Palmer 1974). The bordering Ludlow shelf deposits are less than 500m thick, and thin out towards the south-east (Fig. 1). They consist of bioturbated calcareous siltstone and mudstone, and include minor limestone. Depositional facies are described below for the five study areas, and are shown as a cross-section in Fig. 3. The stratigraphic sections measured within each facies are indicated in Fig. 2. This section is not an attempt to chart the complete history of Ludlow sedimentation in the Welsh Borderland, which is beset with numerous (and interesting) complexities in areas beyond the measured sections. Such a historical approach has been given by Holland & Lawson (1963), who provide a series of palaeogeographic maps. The present study is orientated toward sediment- ology of vertical sections, and establishes environmental gradients used in the following palaeo- ecological analysis. Petrography and diagenesis of Ludlow shelf sediments Terrigenous sediments encountered range from equal mixtures of clay and silt to fine sandy silt- stone, with quartz and mica as the predominant grains. Feldspar and other minerals comprise es 3AlI 2B3 30> N=1/0 N=118 as coquinoid (OE ‘ De a siltstone facies _i R-— “Ml Pols | 23 40- 40- x e 6 3A92 2E1 q 30 - N=107 30- N=120 : & = = bioturbated aa ao siltstone facies Navi 4 2 1o- 1Oo- °°: Hl ai Sen | | — = Bm Q Mese4 5687778 LZ ey Chak G ir is a 8 ons —_ a 4cl ae IEG t a N=/06 i N=/07 30 - 30\— Vue = mudstone S 20- 20- facies 2 & - 1o- Kos B ,—— — = Mie si 4186 I2eSir4a<5) is SIZE OF QUARTZ GRAINS (MM x10 Fig. 4 Size distribution of detrital quartz grains, based on direct measurement to 0°01 mm of apparent grain diameters in thin section. 184 R. WATKINS less than 2°% of detrital grains. Quartz grains show low sphericity and moderate to high angu- larity; grain size measurements are given in Fig. 4. Clay content varies between sedimentary facies, as does the mean size of silt and sand grains. Carbonate content ranges from 7% in the finest- grained terrigenous sediments to nearly 30% in the coarsest siltstones (Holland et al. 1963 : 187), with marked small-scale vertical and lateral variation. Several factors suggest that much of the variation in carbonate is diagenetic — finely crystalline calcite often shows growth into detrital quartz, nodules and shell beds, discussed below, indicate diagenetic movement of carbonate, and no consistent faunal changes occur between adjacent siltstones of highly different carbonate content. Microsparite nodules are present in all sedimentary facies. They have discrete boundaries, ellipsoidal shapes and long axes of less than 15 cm. One thin section from the Upper Elton Beds (sample 4B29) consists of 95% microsparite, 2°/ quartz grains, <1°% mica, <1% bioclasts and 2% other material. Nodules preserve fossils three-dimensionally, in contrast to their crushed state in siltstones. In laminated beds, laminae are compressed beneath nodules and arched over their tops. Whitaker (1962) made similar observations. These features indicate post-depositional but pre-compactional formation of nodules, and attest very early diagenetic movement of car- bonate. Beds of concentrated shell material, interpreted later as high-energy storm deposits, were described by Holland et al. (1963) as ‘shelly limestones’. These beds are usually 2-5 cm thick, and consist mainly of bioclasts and calcite cement (Table 2). In thin section, large calcite crystals are Table 2 Percentage composition of shell beds based on 250-400 point counts of 1 thin section per sample. ULB — Upper Leintwar- dine Beds; UWB — Upper Whitcliffe Beds; LLB — Lower Leintwar- dine Beds; LLB — Lower Bringewood Beds sample number 1B2 2B3 5D 5E8 stratigraphic unit ULB UWB LLB LBB calcite cement 65 65 80 80 bioclasts 19 12 14 13 detrital quartz 6 20 5 2, detrital mica 8 3 1 3 other yD} 1 1 D bounded by bioclasts, and completely enclose detrital grains of quartz and mica. Quartz grains show finely etched boundaries, and are sometimes intruded by small growths of calcite. Large calcite crystals completely enclosing quartz grains have also been observed in physical and optical continuity with brachiopod shells. These observations suggest replacement of quartz by calcite, and derivation of the calcite matrix from surrounding shell material. Siltstones tend to show highest carbonate content immediately around shell beds, which further suggests derivation of the calcite matrix from shells. The ‘limestone’ nature of these shell beds will not be considered relevant to their depositional interpretation. Bedding All Ludlow shelf sediments occur as tabular layers parallel to the general stratification. In the predominant bioturbated sediments, the boundaries of most layers are irregular and laterally impersistent, do not correspond to any internal sedimentary structures, and separate sediment of identical type. In Woodbury Quarry, the thick-layered strata of freshly exposed surfaces are seen to pass laterally into apparently thin-layered beds of the more weathered exposures. This type of layering, which Holland & Lawson (1963) and many others have erroneously described as ‘bedding’, is thus primarily a weathering feature. Primary bedding, where layers correspond to BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 185 sedimentation units, is common only in the laminated shale facies of the Elton Beds and coquinoid siltstone facies of the Leintwardine Beds and Whitcliffe Beds. Bentonites Thin beds of clay are present throughout the Ludlow shelf facies. They are characterized by their softness, lack of fossils and sharp, parallel-sided contacts. These beds are considered as bentonites, and their thicknesses and frequency of occurrence are given in Table 3. The purest bentonites Table 3 Stratigraphic measurements of Ludlow bentonites. EB — Elton Beds; LBB — Lower Bringewood Beds; BL — Upper Bringewood and Lower Leintwardine Beds; LLB — Lower Leintwardine Beds; UWB — Upper Whitcliffe Beds; m — mudstone facies; 1 — laminated shale facies; b — bioturbated siltstone facies; s—calcisiltite facies; a —-‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies; c — coquinoid siltstone facies section number 1E SAG Aa iby ~~ Ape le sy Sie vey zi SAWS DE SD isA stratigraphic unit. EB EB EB LBB BB’ LBB LBB LBB BL BL LLB UWB sedimentary facies m m ] b b b b s a a Cc Cc number of bentonite beds (* incl. derived 3 4 8 1 2 iF he 3 lO? te 9* i= silty claystones) — 43. 28 34 #10 85 53 45 83 66 26 1:8 5-0 thickness of section (m) + number of 5:3 iilesy _11e8} 8:9) 993-7 45 4:6 167 20 08 1-3 6p! bentonite beds bentonite beds as percent of strati- 0:8 O25 See 0-5) 5 io il) OSS Sees 13 = 08 graphic thickness occur in the Elton Beds and Lower Bringewood Beds, where they have sharp, flat bases and appear internally homogeneous. Upper contacts are also sharp and show no burrowing, although they are overlain by thoroughly bioturbated mudstone or siltstone. Bentonites persist laterally across available outcrops. In the Upper Bringewood Beds and Lower Leintwardine Beds, similar bentonites grade upward into silty claystone with well-developed parting planes. The silty claystones contain no fossils or bioturbation and may grade slightly into overlying sediment. They are often present without underlying, pure bentonites. Mudstone facies The mudstone facies forms most parts of the Elton Beds, and reaches thicknesses of 200 m. Sections show an extreme uniformity of texture and composition, and sedimentary structures are very rare. Clay content is about 50%, but cannot be accurately measured because of diagenesis in small mica grains. Quartz grains have an average size of about 0-02 mm, and rarely exceed 0:07 mm (Fig. 4). Shell content is generally 1-2°%. In polished section, sediments show an intricate mottling of clay-rich, dark-coloured areas and more silty, light-coloured areas (PI. 1, fig. 5). Mottled sediment shows no discrete burrows, except for possible vertical burrow fillings of shell debris. In a few samples, mottling can be traced through intermediate stages into well-defined laminae with burrow disruptions (PI. 1, fig. 4). Thus, the typical, mottled character of the facies results from intense deformative bioturbation. 186 R. WATKINS Laminated silt beds comprise less than 1% of stratigraphic sections. They occur as isolated tabular layers 3 cm or less thick, and are continuous across outcrops of 1-2 min extent. These beds have sharp, nearly flat erosional bases and bioturbated tops (PI. 1, fig. 6). Parallel laminae reach thicknesses of 1 mm, and are defined by alternation of clay-rich and clay-poor silt. Maximum grain size reaches 0:2 mm, and a thin basal layer of shell debris is sometimes present. Low-angle, planar cross lamination may also occur. A bedding type resembling the laminated shale facies occurs between 1:3 and 2 m above the base of section 5G at Perton, where beds with sharp, flat bases contain parallel lamination and grade upward into bioturbated mud and silt. They are repetitively developed at 5 cm intervals. Laminated shale facies The laminated shale facies reaches thicknesses of 200 m, and forms the Middle and Upper Elton Beds of the Ludlow area. Most of this sediment is identical in composition and texture to the mud- stone facies, and is also very uniform in vertical profile. Bioturbation is restricted or absent through most of the facies, and the sediments have a flat, parallel lamination or well-developed parting which suggests lamination. Laminations reach 2 mm thick, and are defined by variations in clay content. Additional sediment types occur in the Upper Elton Beds. Beds of highly calcareous, argil- laceous siltstone range from 2 to 5 cm thick, with sharp, parallel, laterally continuous contacts. Graded siltstone beds also occur, reaching 2 cm in thickness with flat erosional bases. Williams & Prentice (1957) described slump structures in the Upper Elton Beds ranging from a few mm to 2 m in scale. Bioturbated siltstone facies The bioturbated siltstone facies is characteristic of the Lower Bringewood Beds, and forms the Upper Bringewood Beds in the Millichope area and places around Ludlow. It reaches 80 m in thickness. Except for sporadic shell beds, vertical profiles show little variation in composition and texture. Clay is present throughout, but is less abundant than silt. Quartz shows a modal grain size of 0:02-0:03 mm (Fig. 4), and may reach sizes of 0:16 mm. Shell material comprises about 1:5% of sediment volume outside of shell beds. Most sediment shows complex mottling like that of the mudstone facies (PI. 1, fig. 3). Traces of thin, burrow-disrupted lamination occur sporadically, and mottling is a result of intense bio- turbation. Chondrites and small subvertical burrows are often present. Shell fragments occur in ill-defined lenticles 0-5-7 cm across which may be the result of burrowing. Plate 1 Bioturbated Siltstone Facies Fig. 1. Bioclastic bed within bioturbated silt, showing sharp lower contact and disturbed upper surface. Sample 5E8, Lower Bringewood Beds, Perton Lane. SO 596398. Fig. 2. Parallel-laminated silt bed within finer-grained bioturbated silt, showing cross-sections of horizontal burrows. Near sample 3A54, Lower Bringewood Beds, Woodbury Quarry. SO 743637. Fig. 3. Thin layer of bioclasts (interpreted in text as ‘swell-lags’) within bioturbated silt. Sample 3A57, Lower Bringewood Beds, Woodbury Quarry. SO 743637. Mudstone Facies Fig. 4. Interbedded laminated silt and mud showing the effects of intense bioturbation. This sample is from a transitional interval between the Mudstone Facies and Bioturbated Siltstone Facies. Sample 5G6, Upper Elton Beds near Perton. SO 592395. Fig. 5. Typical appearance of the Mudstone Facies, showing mottling produced by intense deforma- tive bioturbation and scattered, variably orientated shell material. Sample 4C1, Middle Elton Beds near Ledbury. SO 715386. Fig. 6. Upper portion of a rare laminated silt bed, showing subvertical burrows extending from over- lying bioturbated mudstone. Sample 5H3, Upper Elton Beds near Perton. SO 592394. All figures are untreated rock slabs cut vertically to bedding; scales equal 1 cm. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES r i Mite i bat = IE DARE IE 2 “sl e. 5 188 R. WATKINS Non-bioturbated, primary bedding composes about 4% of the facies. Isolated beds of laminated siltstone are identical to those of the mudstone facies (PI. 1, fig. 2). Lenticular beds of shells and shell fragments also occur, and are generally 1-4 cm thick and less than 2 m in apparent length. Bases of beds are sharp erosional contacts. Upper surfaces are intensely bioturbated, with stringers of shell debris incorporated into the overlying siltstone (Pl. 1, fig. 1). Very thin layers of shell fragments and convex-upwards shells lying parallel to the bedding also occur throughout the facies, showing many burrow disruptions (PI. 1, fig. 3). They have an average frequency of about 1 layer per 40 cm of vertical section. Calcisiltite facies The calcisiltite facies forms the Lower Bringewood Beds in the immediate area of Ledbury, and is a very local lateral equivalent of the bioturbated siltstone facies. It is 53 m thick, and is shown in detail in Fig. 19, p. 217. The sediment consists of very calcareous siltstone and gradational silty and argillaceous limestone. One thin section of the purest limestone is composed of 89% micro- sparite, 3% bioclasts, 7% mica and argillaceous material and 1% quartz grains. Most sediment, however, contains at least 50% terrigenous material. Bioturbation is apparent throughout the calcisiltite facies by scattered, variably orientated shell material and the presence of Chondrites. Flat continuous weathering planes, traceable for several metres laterally, probably represent the original bedding. These planes contain local concentrations of convex-upwards shells. Thin, lenticular shell beds, identical to those of the bioturbated silt- stone facies, also occur. Minor stratigraphic variations within the calcisiltite facies are shown in Fig. 19. ‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies This facies comprises the Upper Bringewood Beds and basal Lower Leintwardine Beds of the Woodbury Quarry, Ledbury and Perton areas, and reaches 15 m in thickness. It is also present at the type boundary of these two units near Ludlow. One thin section from sample 5D11, from the Upper Bringewood Beds at Perton Quarry, consists of 93°% microsparite, 2°% quartz grains and 1% mica and argillaceous material. The limestone is generally siltier, however, and shows all gradations to highly calcareous siltstone. Microsparite nodules comprise 15% of the facies by volume. In unweathered exposures, the only definition of bedding in this facies are thin bentonites, which divide the limestone into layers 0-5-2 m thick. This thick-bedded aspect of the facies can be seen in the Upper Bringewood Beds shown in PI. 3, fig. 2 (p. 195). Sedimentary structures have not been observed within these layers, except for a single parallel-laminated bed observed at Woodbury Quarry. This may reflect intense bioturbation. Shells are usually rare and widely scattered, but sometimes occur in concentrated layers immediately below bentonites. This facies extends upwards into the basal few metres of the Lower Leintwardine Beds, as determined by faunal content. These occurrence are distinguished, however, by beds of concen- trated shell material and parallel-laminated, silty limestone with sharp erosional bases. Although compositionally like strata of the Upper Bringewood Beds, the limestones of the basal Lower Leintwardine Beds show periodic higher energy conditions. They grade upwards into the coquin- oid siltstone facies, which contains similar sedimentary structures. The preceding description of the ‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies applies only to the Woodbury Quarry, Ledbury and Perton areas, and section 2D near Ludlow. Upper Bringewood carbonates west of Ludlow, in the area between View Edge and Aymestrey, are distinguished by a dominant, sparry texture, common sedimentary structures, and common shell beds. These carbonates represent a more high-energy environment, and are located along a postulated shelf-edge barrier zone. Two depositional facies occur in this area, one characterized by common trough cross- bedding and deflation deposits of Kirkidium. The second facies is developed as thin tabular beds with great lateral continuity, and probably represents down-slope redeposition of carbonate sedi- ment. A facies analysis of Upper Bringewood carbonates throughout the northern Welsh Border- land will be detailed in a separate publication. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 189 Coquinoid siltstone facies The coquinoid siltstone facies forms the Leintwardine Beds and Whitcliffe Beds, and reaches 80 m in thickness. Clay content is low, and silt and shell material predominate. Average grain size of quartz is 0:03-0:04 mm, and about 10% of grains are of fine sand grade (Fig. 4). Minor vertical variations in texture are common. Bioturbation is present throughout the facies, varying from discrete burrows in laminated beds to intricate, deformative mottling (Pl. 2, figs 1, 2, 5). Primary bedding has been destroyed in about 75% of measured sections. In general, however, bioturbation is not as intense as in other terri- genous facies, and small traces of lamination commonly remain. Shell beds comprise an average of 3% of the facies, but are highly variable in abundance between sections (Table 4). Shell material accounts for 5—20°% of bed volume, and may be parallel to bedding and convex-upwards, or without consistent orientation (PI. 2, fig. 4). Quartz grains in shell beds reach larger sizes than in the surrounding sediment, and may exceed 0:2 mm. Rounded intraformational pebbles below 5 cm in size occur in shell beds of the Lower Leintwardine Beds. The shell beds have erosional bases which are usually flat and parallel to the general stratifi- cation. Occasionally they fill small scours less than 5cm deep and 20cm across. The beds are variable in thickness (Table 4), usually below 5 cm, and form small sheets, thickest centrally and Table 4 Stratigraphic measurements of shell beds in the coquinoid siltstone facies. ULB - Upper Leintwardine Beds; LLB -— Lower Leintwardine Beds; UWB- Upper Whitcliffe Beds; LWB-— Lower Whitcliffe Beds; WB — Whitcliffe Beds, undifferentiated section number 1B 1C 2B 2C 3A 3A 4A 5A 5C stratigraphic unit ULB LLB UWB LWB WB LLB LLB UWB LLB number of shell beds 6 14 9 4 5 i7/ 27 5 9 mean bed thickness (cm) 6°8 4:2 1:8 2:0 3°6 Des 4°8 1°8 3°3 thickness of section (m) +number of shell beds shell beds as percentage of stratigraphic thickness 065 0-46 1:16 5:74 6:00 0:97 0-49 1:22 0°64 10°5 SPI ES) 0:3 0°6 2°6 SPT 1195) oy thinning towards their margins; they usually extend less than 5 m laterally. Where bioturbation is minimal, shell beds form the basal layers of laminated sheets of silt (Pl. 2, fig. 4). Upper boundaries of shell beds are marked by a sharp reduction in shell density, their matrix being sometimes in textural continuity with the overlying laminated silt. As shell beds pinch out laterally, they are replaced by laminated siltstone, and a laminated siltstone sheet may have several separate lenses of shells along its base. All gradations exist between single basal shell layers and shell beds up to 10 cm thick. Bioturbation has often destroyed the laminations above shell beds, and burrowing may disrupt their upper contacts. Laminated siltstone forms 22% of the facies (PI. 2, fig. 1). Laminae are usually 0-5-1 mm thick, but may reach thicknesses of 3 mm. They consist of alternations of quartz-dominated silt and clay-rich, mica-dominated silt. Laminae consist locally of pure, uniformly-orientated biotite. Laminated siltstone forms tabular continuous sheets with nearly flat erosional bases. Where not disrupted by bioturbation, the sheets are continuous across outcrops reaching 10 m in lateral extent. Some detailed stratigraphic distributions of these beds are shown in Fig. 10 (p. 201) and Figs 16, 18 and 20 (pp. 213-218). In the Lower Leintwardine Beds, Upper Leintwardine Beds and Lower Whitcliffe Beds, laminated siltstone usually occurs as isolated sheets within sequences of bioturbated siltstone. These sheets are less than 10 cm thick and have intensely bioturbated tops. In Perton Quarry, however, bentonites have preserved upper surfaces of sheets with symmetrical ripple marks 1-2 cm 190 R. WATKINS in height and 20-30 cm in apparent length. Sheets are formed internally of flat to slightly wavy parallel lamination. Small ripple bedding, as defined by Reineck & Singh (1973), is also present. The Upper Whitcliffe Beds contain more laminated siltstone, with smaller intervals of biotur- bated sediment (Figs 16 and 20). Thin, laminated sheets like those described above occur. Other laminated sheets reach 50 cm in thickness. These have nearly flat erosional bases and bioturbated tops. Internally, they consist of several distinct beds with erosional contacts, often showing a number of basal shell layers and two or three stages of minor burrowing; often beds are cut out completely at the base of other beds. They contain wavy, parallel lamination or small ripple bed- ding. Cross sets are generally 2 cm or less thick, of both planar and trough form, and orientated at less than 5° to the general stratification. Another type of laminated siltstone sheet reaches 20 cm in thickness and contains parallel, even lamination throughout. In contrast to other beds, these sheets may completely lack biotur- bation. Siltstone sheets containing convoluted laminae are also present. One such sheet, which defines the base of the Upper Whitcliffe Beds at Ludlow, has a lateral extent of at least 500 m (Holland et al. 1963). The storm-related model of shelf sedimentation Gadow & Reineck (1969) and Reineck & Singh (1972) described modern shelf sediments, in the Mediterranean and North Sea, which consist of bioturbated mud with interbedded sheets of laminated sand and silt. Laminated sheets have nearly flat erosional bases, infrequent basal shell layers and bioturbated upper surfaces. They decrease in thickness with increasing distance from shore. Similar beds from the Georgia shelf were described by Howard & Reineck (1972). These authors proposed a storm-related model of shelf sedimentation. Normal shelf deposition consists of settling of suspended silt and clay which is thoroughly reworked by burrowing. During storms, sand or silt is eroded from nearshore areas and transported onto the shelf by retreating waves and ebb currents. In the southern North Sea, sand from tidal flats is carried and redeposited as far as 50 km out onto the shelf (Gadow & Reineck 1969). Minor erosion of the shelf surface, sometimes accompanied by emplacement of a shell layer, is followed by rapid settling of sand or coarse silt as tabular, laminated sheets. This may be followed by rapid settling of suspended mud. Reineck & Singh (1972) considered the sand or coarse silt to be transported in a turbidity-current fashion as ‘clouds’ of material which settle as the energy of transport decreases. Goldring & Bridges (1973) reviewed the general features of laminated sheets in ancient and modern shelf sediments, and also concluded that very rapid turbidity-current type deposition is involved. Storm-related models of sedimentation have also been applied to Jurassic and Devonian shell beds by Brenner & Davies (1973) and Bowen, Rhoads & McAlester (1974). These shell beds form erosively-based sheets several cm thick within finer-grained, often bioturbated sediment. In the Plate 2 Coquinoid Siltstone Facies Fig. 1. Portion of a tabular bed of cross-laminated silt, with large subvertical burrow. Section 1C, Lower Leintwardine Beds near Millichope Park. SO 529890. Fig. 2. Small-scale relations of laminated silt, bioturbated silt and bioclastic layers, showing incipient destruction of bedding by burrowing. Section 5A, Upper Whitcliffe Beds, Perton. SO 597403. Fig. 3. Detail of quarry face showing dominantly tabular bedding in the uppermost portion of the Coquinoid Siltstone Facies. Most of the beds shown represent ‘amalgamated sheets’ of laminated siltstone. Section 5A, as last. Fig. 4. Bioclastic layer resting on bioturbated silt and overlain by laminated silt. The shelly layer and laminated silt are attributed to rapid sedimentation during a single storm event. Sample 5A4, Upper Whitcliffe Beds, Perton. SO 597403. Fig. 5. Burrowing in a laminated silt bed, showing vertical sections of the trace fossil Chondrites. Sample 4A28, Upper Leintwardine Beds, Frith Wood, near Ledbury. SO 722402. Figures 1, 2, 4 and 5 are untreated rock slabs cut vertically to bedding; scales equal 1 cm. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 19] 192 R. WATKINS Jurassic examples, shell beds contain larger detrital grains than the surrounding sediment, and in the Devonian example they are overlain by laminated sheets of siltstone. The shell beds represent higher depositional energies than the sediments with which they are intercalated, and Brenner & Davies (1973) and Bowen et al. (1974) related them to rapid transport and deposition during storms. Bridges (1975) has made similar interpretations for shell beds at the base of laminated sandstones in Llandovery shelf deposits. Application of the model to Ludlow shelf sediments The Ludlow terrigenous facies in the Welsh Borderland are directly comparable to modern shelf sediments in consisting of an alternation of bioturbated silt and clay with coarser-grained, laminated sheets of silt (PI. 1, fig. 2). Laminated siltstone sheets in Ludlow facies represent rapid, turbidite-type deposition during storms. Shell beds are genetically related deposits, and represent the traction load, or initially-settling coarse fraction, during mass transport of silt. Emplacement of sheets of shells and laminated silt was accompanied by very little erosion of the Ludlow shelf. This is indicated by their flat, generally non-scoured bases, and also by faunal evidence. As discussed later, shell beds consist almost wholly of epifauna, with significantly fewer infaunal shells than in bioturbated sediment. Lingulids, for example, were very rarely scoured from their burrows on the Ludlow shelf. In the bioturbated siltstone facies, 95°% of observed lingulids occur in vertical life position (N=55), and 81% are in life position in bioturbated sediment of the co- quinoid siltstone facies (N=26). These relations indicate that sediment deposited in the study area remained essentially in place. Palaeocurrent directions indicate that sources of the storm- derived silt were probably from the south and east (Bailey & Reese 1973). Terrigenous deposits of the measured sections show a stratigraphic succession from the mud- stone facies, through the bioturbated siltstone facies to the coquinoid siltstone facies (Fig. 3). This succession shows the following trends: 1. Upward decrease in clay content, shown relatively in Table 5 by the increase in volumetric proportion of quartz grains. Table 5 Quartz composition of Ludlow terrigenous facies, based on 100-250 point counts on one thin section per sample. S — sample number; Q — percentage of detrital quartz. The general increase in quartz percentage from the mudstone facies to coquinoid siltstone facies is a general reflection of a decreasing amount of clay within sediments coquinoid siltstone facies mudstone facies bioturbated siltstone facies : : oreo Elton Beds Benecy ood Beds ema and Whitcliffe eds S) Q S Q S Q 1E6 20% 1D10 34% 2B3 59% 4Cl 24% 2E1 27% 2Ci) oy, 3A92 QTY, 3A11 45% SE3 26% 3A14 49% SF1 DIY, 5A4 49% 2. Upward increase in average silt size, with sand appearing high in the succession (Fig. 4). 3. Upward decrease in bioturbation, from over 99% destruction of primary sedimentary structures in the mudstone facies to about 75% destruction in the coquinoid siltstone facies. 4. Upward increase in frequency and thickness of laminated sheets of siltstone and shell beds. 5. Upward trend towards reworking and sediment dilution of bentonites. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 193 These trends indicate a general increase in sedimentation rate, energy level and proximity to sediment source. The mudstone facies represents a distal, shelf, quiet environment, as indicated by fine grain size, intense bioturbation and stratigraphic position at the initiation of a marine deepening in the Welsh Borderland (Hurst 1975a). Sedimentation appears to have been dominantly from suspension, and the rarity of laminated siltstone sheets indicates lack of storm influence and distance from sources of redeposited sediment. The bioturbated siltstone facies also represents a distal shelf environment removed from sediment sources, but increasing agitation is apparent by frequent concentrations of shell material. These concentrations are compared to ‘swell lags’ in following sections, and related to the distal passage of wave motion (but not transported sediment) during storms. The coquinoid siltstone facies completes the Ludlow terrigenous cycle, and represents a proxi- mal shelf environment, nearer to the sediment source, and subject to frequent storm sedimentation. The culmination of this trend is seen in the Upper Whitcliffe Beds, where convolute laminations and the predominance of laminated siltstone sheets indicate the highest sedimentation rates. The amalgamated sheets of siltstone in this interval probably represent close proximity to sources of redeposited sediment (Goldring & Bridges 1973). Significance of the laminated shale facies The laminated shale facies is laterally equivalent to the mudstone facies (Fig. 3), and also repre- sents a very low-energy, distal shelf environment. Although identical in texture and composition to the mudstone facies, it differs in its lamination and rarity of bioturbation. Rhoads & Morse (1971) identified very low oxygen concentrations as a major restrictive factor for bioturbating organisms of offshore shelves. Where concentrations of bottom oxygen reach their lowest levels in the Santa Barbara Basin and Gulf of California, shelf muds preserve complete lamination, and have few burrowing organisms (Emery & Hiilsemann 1962; Calvert 1964). Low oxygen level and rarity of burrowers can be considered a major environmental distinction of the Ludlow laminated shale facies. The relation of Ludlow carbonates to the terrigenous shelf succession The ‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies of the Upper Bringewood Beds and basal Lower Leintwardine Beds in sections studied here is an interruption of the terrigenous succession discussed above (Fig. 3). From Ludlow to the Ledbury area, the “‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies can be characterized as quiet-water and offshore, but otherwise shows no sedimentary features diagnostic of a specific environment. Its fauna, the Atrypa reticularis — coral Association, is a depauperate assemblage compared with the underlying bioturbated siltstone facies, which suggests some restrictive type of environment. According to the correlation presented in Table 1, p. 181, these carbonates are equivalent in age to high-energy, Kirkidium-bearing limestones of the shelf edge area. Alexander (1936) and Lawson (1973a) considered these shelf-edge limestones as very shallow-water in nature and possibly form- ing a low submarine ridge. This interpretation is supported by the sedimentary observations given earlier. From these relations, we can conclude that the low-energy ‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies of the study area represents a back-barrier deposit, formed under deeper, quieter water than the high-energy limestones at the relief edge. Phipps & Reeve (1967) and Lawson (1973a) have considered Upper Bringewood carbonates as the shallowest part of a Lower Ludlow shoaling cycle, followed by transgressive or deeper- water conditions during deposition of the Lower Leintwardine Beds. This interpretation is valid for the shelf edge regions around Leintwardine and Aymestrey, outside the present study area. Interpretation of an Upper Bringewood shallowing, followed by deepening in Lower Leint- wardine times, is not valid for the areas considered in this study, however, and ignores important differences between shelf edge and inner shelf areas. These differences may be listed as follows: 194 R. WATKINS Shelf edge (Leintwardine, Aymestrey areas) Upper Bringewood Beds comprising carbonates with high-energy sedimentary structures and abundant sparite Upper Bringewood Beds end with an erosional surface at the base of the overlying Lower Leint- wardine Beds, with abrupt faunal change Basal Lower Leintwardine Beds often very clay rich, and often with relatively poor bioturbation Inner shelf (Woodbury Quarry, Perton areas) Upper Bringewood Beds of massive, low-energy carbonate of microsparite and argillaceous material Continuous sedimentary and faunal transition, with no erosional breaks between the Upper Bringewood Beds and Lower Leintwardine Beds Lower Leintwardine Beds typical of coquinoid siltstone facies described earlier, continuing terri- and partially preserved, parallel lamination genous sedimentary trends from the Lower Bringewood Beds The low-energy “Aymestry Limestone’ facies of the study area appears to represent a pause in the progression of terrigenous shelf deposits over the Welsh Borderland, related to reduced terri- genous supply and local elevation of a barrier zone at the shelf edge. These low-energy carbonates grade upward into the coquinoid siltstone facies of the Lower Leintwardine Beds, which continues the general progressionary trend of terrigenous facies. Lawson (1973a) has referred to a basal conglomerate of regional development as the beginning of Lower Leintwardine deposition. An uninterrupted sedimentary transition from the Upper Bringewood Beds to the Lower Leintwar- dine Beds can be observed in the type section near Ludlow and at Woodbury Quarry and Perton Quarry (PI. 3, fig. 2). Measurement of these sections cm by cm has failed to reveal a basal Lower Leintwardine conglomerate. Several laminated siltstone sheets in the lowest several metres of the Lower Leintwardine Beds in Woodbury and Perton Quarries include scattered pebbles of lime- stone and calcareous siltstone. These pebbles almost certainly relate to minor intraformational erosion during storms. They do not represent a discrete basal conglomerate, and do not indicate an abrupt change in regional depositional conditions. Shell occurrence Disturbed neighbourhood assemblages and transported assemblages Ludlow shell occurrences can be assigned to two general taphonomic categories defined by Scott (1974). Transported asemblages consist of shells which have been mechanically deposited during sedimentation. This term refers to a process, and has no implicit connotations of distance or ecological mixing. In Ludlow sediments, these assemblages consist of storm-related shell beds as described earlier, associated with erosional surfaces and laminated sheets of siltstone. Examples are shown in PI. 1, fig. 1 and PI. 2, fig. 4. Other transported assemblages are formed of convex- upwards shells which are closely packed in layers parallel to bedding (Plate 4, p. 225). Scott (1974) defined a disturbed neighbourhood assemblage as fossils which have been shifted from their life positions, but not significantly moved or mixed ecologically. Bioturbation is the common agent of disturbance. These assemblages have been identified in this study by a dispersed, inconsistently orientated scatter of shells within bioturbated sediment (PI. 1, fig. 5). This is the most common type of shell occurrence in Ludlow shelf sediments. Plate 3 Fig. 1. Vertical saw-cut section of the Ludlow Bone Bed from the type locality at Ludford Lane, Ludlow. In this sample the bone bed is developed as two layers of bone material, the lower one being barely visible in the lower left of the figure. Note the sharp contacts of the upper layer of bone material, and the overlying parallel-laminated silt; compare with PI. 2, fig. 4. These features are indicative of storm-related redeposition of sediment rather than in-place accumulation of the bone material, as discussed in text. Scale in figure indicates 1 cm. Fig. 2. Perton Quarry (designated as section 5D in this report), showing the Upper Bringewood Beds (‘Aymestry Limestone’ Facies) and Lower Leintwardine Beds (Coquinoid Siltstone Facies). Note the laterally continuous. tabular character of bedding. Photograph by Charles Aithie. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 195 % s Q % N R 3 Ky AN ~“ At) N iS it) > Q N Upper Bringewood Beds R. WATKINS 196 “S[ENPIAIPU! PO] =Se[dues Jo ozIs Uva] “OZIS o[dures [eNPIAIpUI-O¢ 3 soldods Jo JoquMU IO} XxopUl UONSRJoIVI — QI ‘vsojyf piydodjsojdaT — SG :SaateAlq — p] ‘Si4vjnoiyjaa vdkap — ¢{ ‘spodonses — Z|] ‘vsoaya siyjsosy — [{ *SOUQO]I} — Of ‘v1n) vinpiddyD — 6 Ssje109 Ployso1} — g :vyddjsna vjjauoydoagy — 1 ‘spodoryseiq snorea —9 ‘spodoyeydes —¢ ‘vozociq — p Spypjnaunf viydossiydup — ¢ Svjv81aavj niydoajsopyoydosap — 7 :*ds vuanjdajopidaT pur vssasdap vuavjdaT — | ‘2u0}S}IIs poyeqinjorq ur sose{quiesse pooymMoqysieu psqinjsip wos SsousIEYIp [eUNvJ JOfeW OU MOYS spaq ][OYs Wo sode[quiosse po}1OdsuvI} yey} NON “9U0}S)[IS poyequnjorg UTYIIM M990 pue “AT[eo1yeUIOyos uMoOYs oe Spaq [JPYS “UONRIDOSsy vJnsIaav] vIYdosjsopljoydosapw sy} Surureyuod ‘adoysyIW ‘spog PoomesuLg IOMOT ‘CI uondeg ¢ ‘SIy St Sb 7 elec Ol SG en 7a ShaeG wy L “NX « «¢ DOOSOwO SAoblae [)a = ee) A ez 0 ‘ [eae | | | | G0 | i = = . : = sar | = = | E EH I1SGl : a | ; = : : ae ass tel OF | = : : =a: 1 = = 3 = = r = : F BE a = 4 = =: = = = cat [= Ee a me ZdL TSS SSN WGN SYAIIES Ske e BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 197 Shell occurrence in the mudstone facies and laminated shale facies Sections of the mudstone facies show a continuous stratigraphic occurrence of disturbed neigh- bourhood assemblages of shells. Shell material is evenly scattered through sediment in many orientations, as shown in PI. 1, fig. 5. Rare lingulids and endobyssate bivalves remain in burrowing position, but life orientations and small-scale distributions of other forms have been destroyed by intense bioturbation. The pattern of long-term stratigraphic persistence of disturbed neighbour- hood assemblages has been defined as the vital-pantostrate biofacies by Shafer (1972). He con- sidered the biofacies to preserve a complete in-place history of communities of fine-grained, quiet bottoms. This is corroborated in the mudstone facies by gradual stratigraphic cycles in the abundance of different species. repetitive views of the same bedding plane showing all observed shells; each grid = 100 cm? Sedgwickia amygda/ina ‘Camarotoechia’ nucula Protochonetes ludloviensis shell fragments | of all species + articulated individual ebrachial valve epedicle valve -indeterminate single valve mright valve r 1 1 1 = q—4-—--—-—--—------ STRIKE=N24°E Alentevalve 0 I@ 20 30 40 eM | NV DIP=44°W Fig. 6 Faunal variation in a disturbed neighbourhood assemblage of the Protochonetes ludloviensis Association in the Whitcliffe Beds of section 4A, Ledbury. This assemblage occurs 50°83 m above the base of the section, and can be located by this reading in Fig. 11. The laminated shale facies contains rare intervals of intensely bioturbated sediment with a shell occurrence like that of the mudstone facies. Most of the laminated shale facies, however, contains only graptolites, cephalopods and other pelagic organisms, with very rare benthic shells. Shafer (1972) discussed this type of shell occurrence as the letal-pantostrate biofacies, and related it to a poorly oxygenated bottom environment. Shell occurrence in the bioturbated siltstone facies, calcisiltite facies and ‘Aymestry Limestone’ facies Disturbed neighbourhood asemblages in bioturbated sediment are the main type of shell occur- rence in these facies, and can be seen below the shell bed in PI. 1, fig. 1. Transported assemblages occur as rare erosively-based shell beds, as also shown in PI. 1, fig. 1. The fauna in transported shell beds does not differ from that in surrounding disturbed neighbourhood assemblages. This is shown graphically in Fig. 5, and discussed in the next section, p. 200. Another type of transported assemblage consists of very thin bedding-parallel layers of closely- packed shells and shell fragments. A vertical section of one of these layers is shown in PI. 1, fig. 3, and upper surfaces of layers are illustrated in PI. 4, figs 1-5. These layers are often no thicker than a single shell, with no associated erosional surface, and have identical bioturbated sediment above and below. Shells are both whole and disarticulated, variably broken and unabraded. Faunal con- tent is identical to surrounding disturbed neighbourhood assemblages. The shell layers probably represent ‘swell lags’, which are discussed below. 198 R. WATKINS In general, shell occurrence in these three facies represents an intermediate taphonomic state between relatively in-place faunas of the underlying mudstone facies and more disturbed, often transported shell occurrences of the overlying coquinoid siltstone facies. repetitive views of the same bedding plane showing all observed shells; each grid = 2500 cm2 Gr dio enone ies oBV ‘Camarotoechia’ nucula Howellella elegans p -1 o BV * PV + PV Shaleria ornatella Dayia navicula + PV Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Isorthis orbicularis single pelecypod valves Orbiculoi dea gastropod o rugata bryozoan + I- indeterminate single valve STRIKE=N37°E BV- brachial valve ran es ee ron as PV- pedicle valve Gio o OOS aS eueM pear Fig. 7 Faunal variation in a disturbed neighbourhood assemblage of the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association in the Lower Leintwardine Beds of section 4A, Ledbury. This plane is sample 4A42, which is shown stratigraphically in Fig. 10. The closely-packed shells in the two lower right grids are a small transported assemblage. Shell occurrence in the coquinoid siltstone facies Disturbed neighbourhood assemblages occur throughout bioturbated sediment of this facies, and have been investigated by inscribing grids on small areas of bedding surface. One example is shown in Fig. 6, where a discrete cluster of endobyssate bivalves occurs in one small area, separated by about 25 cm from a cluster of articulated and separate rhynchonellid valves. Both clusters are probably very close to their life positions, and their distributions suggest small-scale clumping of conspecific populations. Fig. 7 shows the distribution of a more scattered, disturbed neighbourhood assemblage. In this example, the slight differences in distribution of species may be a blurred reflection of original areas of life. However, the brachiopods are wholly disarticulated, and some species are represented mainly by pedicle valves. Transported assemblages in the coquinoid siltstone facies are frequently represented by thin bedding-parallel layers of shells not associated with erosional surfaces. These are illustrated in Pl. 5, figs 1-4. Fig. 8 shows a grid analysis of faunal distribution in a thin layer of closely-packed shells. Significant lateral variation occurs in the composition of this shell layer. For example, Grid D in Fig. 8 contains a nearly equal mixture of ‘Camarotoechia’, Hyattidina, Salopina, BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 199 Sphaerirhynchia and Isorthis, while Grid K, 2 m away, is dominated by ‘Camarotoechia’, Salopina, bivalves and ostracods. This small-scale variation may indicate that transport during formation of the shell layer was limited, partially maintaining original distributions. It probably does not result from different hydrodynamic properties of the various taxa, which would be nearly identical in the case of Jsorthis and Salopina. EACH LETTERED GRID = 100 CM2 [_] OTHERS NV BIVALVES PROTOCHONETES LUDLOVIENSIS mt DAYIA NAVICULA Fe] /SORTHIS ORBICULARIS SPHAERIRHYNCHIA WILSONI al A TA Si ASS ASS F <>] HYATTIDINA CAWAL/S ‘CAMAROTOECHIA’ NUCULA <___ Number of =~ shells PERCENT ARTICULATED ‘CAMAROTOECHIA (cpa) Pane isate lin edit icine surface N comeave upward NS she convex upward Ds (ls 15 i PERCENT BROKEN fe Ks ma =) = | SHELLS Fig. 8 Faunal variation in a very thin ‘swell-lag’ layer of transported a which covers the entire bedding plane and not just the sampled grids. This example is from the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association of the Lower Leintwardine Beds, section 4A, and is shown in Fig. 10 as sample 4A45. The swell lag mechanism discussed by Brenner & Davies (1973: fig. 12) is a probable cause of the thin shell layers like that described above. Swell lags may form in fine-grained shelf sediment when storm-produced waves rework the upper shelf surface, suspending shells and sediment grains. Shells then settle first as a concentrated, coarse fraction, without significant lateral move- ment. Storm-deposited beds of transported shells in the coquinoid siltstone facies have been described in the previous section, and are shown in PI. 2, fig. 4. Faunal distribution on the upper surface of a shell bed is shown in Fig. 9. In contrast to the previous example, faunal content of the bed is fairly uniform over several metres, suggesting thorough mixing during transport. A graphic comparison of fauna between some transported shell beds and disturbed neighbourhood assem- blages in the coquinoid siltstone facies is given in Figs 10 and 11. Faunal differences between the two types of assemblages and their implications will be discussed in the next section. 200 R. WATKINS g ®» f HIND K ‘ &> GU) Baddimenniane ah 50 CM EACH LETTERED GRID = 100 CM2 + ++ + ++ > + ++! RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF TAXA Za ecco Zo I number of shells YQ) > D @ > & N 5 On) eo) PERCENT BROKEN SHELLS NN a shells inclined to bedding surface concave upward Wy 10 Howellella : P brachial valves 50 i: “a Fy Howellella ii 0 pedicle valves he oelgeaeasl* Sh ipien [Ses LiSaoUe Litman edie Ua “‘CAMAROTOECHIA’ il DAYIA PROTOCHONETES HOWELLELLA NUCULA NAVICULA LUDLOVIENSIS ELEGANS SPHAERIRHYNCHIA SALOPINA ++] /SORTHIS = WILSONI/ LUNATA ORBICULARIS E) CASES Fig. 9 Faunal variation on the upper surface of a 5 cm thick shell bed, shown as sample 4A44 in Fig. 10. From the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association, Lower Leintwardine Beds, section 4A. The alternation of transported and disturbed neighbourhood assemblages in the coquinoid siltstone facies represents the vital-lipostrate biofacies of Shafer (1972). Nearly in-place communi- ties are recorded in bioturbated sediment, biological information is lost at erosional surfaces, and transported faunas are introduced during storms. Shafer’s model for the vital-lipostrate biofacies states that benthic communities are killed en masse by very rapid storm sedimentation and erosion. This phenomenon affected faunas living during deposition of the coquinoid siltstone facies. Infaunal lingulids and bivalves occur in life position beneath storm-deposited, laminated siltstone sheets, and show no evidence of escape trails, while epifauna are found as concentrated, transported layers along the base of the sheets. Analysis of shell transport Method of analysis This section analyses the effects of shell transport in the bioturbated siltstone facies and coquinoid siltstone facies. Transported assemblages have been identified on sedimentological not faunal 201 BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES ‘OZIS o[dUIvS [ENPIAIPUI-E¢ 3¥ SaIdeds Jo JoqUINU IOJ XOpUl UOTSRJoIeI — g] {sIaquinu e[dures — ¢] ‘spodoryoesq J9y}0 — py {vjno1aDU pidvg — €] ‘subsaja vjayjamoH — ZI ‘Syouvs ouipiyjod yy — |] S1uosjim viyoudyssavydg — QO] = z lower phase of Sphaerirhynchia — Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association wilsoni Association 2 100% 7 Fa 7) a uw 50% WwW oO Zz < a) Zz @@ =>>i0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 a = upper phase of Sphaerirhynchia = wilsoni Association Protochonetes ludloviensis Assoc. = 100% = < =| uw a = 50% >) = x< < = ® @ ® 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CONTINUOUS STRATIGRAPHIC OCCURRENCES IN SAM- PLES ALONG MEASURED SECTIONS Fig. 24 Definition and comparison of opportunistic species in Ludlow communities. Dots represent values for single brachiopod species, and dots with circles represent several species. The ‘oppor- tunistic species field’ is defined to include the major cluster of species in the upper phase of the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association. This provides a method for making relative comparisons of opportunism between communities. Sources of bias in the plots and further discussion are given in the text. Table 14 summarizes the XY plots in Fig. 24 according to the percentage of arbitrarily-defined opportunistic brachiopod species within Ludlow communities. The lowest percentage of oppor- tunistic species is present in the G. obovata Association of the mudstone facies. Percentage of opportunists increase in communities of the stratigraphically higher bioturbated siltstone facies, and the highest percentage of opportunism occurs in the S. wi/soni Association of the coquinoid siltstone facies. Table 14 shows that, in general, the increase in environmental sedimentation- produced stress in Ludlow stratigraphic sections is accompanied by increased percentages within communities of brachiopod species with opportunistic patterns of occurrence. Hallam (1972) also suggested that eurytopic species may change their population strategies over their environmental range. This is shown by several Ludlow brachiopods. Jsorthis, for 244 R. WATKINS example, has plots as an ‘equilibrium species’ in communities of the bioturbated siltstone facies, but as an ‘opportunistic species’ in the S. wilsoni Association of the coquinoid siltstone facies. The P. ludloviensis Association, at the most high-stress end of the stratigraphic-environmental gradient, is an apparent anomaly in the trend discussed above (Table 14). This is because most of its recorded brachiopod species are very rare survivors from previous communities. These species have plots in the lower left corner of the XY field (Fig. 24), and bias the calculation of opportun- ism within the association. Table 14 Percentages of opportunistic brachiopod species in Ludlow communities, as determined by criteria in Fig. 24, p. 243. Go-—G. obovata Association; Ml— M. laevigata Association; IpSw —lower phase of S. wilsoni Association; upSw-upper phase of S. wilsoni Association; Pl—P. /udloviensis Association Leintwardine and stratigraphic unit Elton Beds Bringewood Beds Whitcliffe Beds facies mudstone bioturbated siltstone coquinoid siltstone association Go MI IpSw upSw_ Pil number of brachiopod species 30 Bz 27 19 15 percent opportunistic species 3 9 11 53 13 The trends in opportunism within Ludlow communities correlate with observed features of the major terrigenous sedimentary facies, which suggests a direct relation to sedimentation-produced environmental stress. Susceptibility of populations to total destruction during storm-sedimenta- tion events was probably a factor which favoured opportunistic reproductive strategies among Ludlow brachiopods, as discussed above, p. 231. Alternative explanations for the opportunistic patterns, not directly observable in the rock record, may also be involved. For example, fluctuat- ing levels of food resources may contribute to dominance of marine communities by opportunistic species, and stable, and often lower, levels of resources may favour equilibrium species (Valentine 1971). Patterns of predation may also affect numerical fluctuations of particular species, as dis- cussed later. Faunal destructions in Ludlow communities Bentonites and storm-deposited silts As noted earlier, bentonites and storm-deposited sheets of laminated silt represent two types of biologically-destructive events preserved in Ludlow sections. Frequency of the later type of event shows a general correlation with decreased diversity of fauna and abundance of opportunistic species, as we have seen. In this section, we wish to test whether these events have any specific effect on the small-scale stratigraphic variation within particular communities. Bentonites contain no burrows or body fossils, and extend laterally for great lengths along Ludlow outcrops. They were probably formed by rapid ashfalls, killing the benthic faunas on which they settled. Shells immediately below a bentonite are usually widely scattered and variably orientated, as elsewhere in bioturbated sediment. Storm-deposited laminated sheets of silt also rapidly buried and destroyed benthic faunas at particular sites. Concentration of epifaunal shells at the base of these sheets, burial of infaunal shells below them, and lack of escape trails indicate this total destruction. By analogy with modern processes, these destructive events were probably of very short duration, occurring over a day or less. Bentonites and storm-deposited silts are over- lain by fossiliferous bioturbated sediment, indicating a return of normal, slow sedimentation following ashfalls or storms, and recolonization of the new sediment by benthos. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 245 A model of recolonization Ecological succession is a process by which a community at a particular place changes pre- dictably in composition through time, either through change in physical environment, the effects of biotic activity of organisms, or both. Johnson (1972) proposed that succession is an integral part of marine benthic communities, and has developed a predictive model around this concept. Following theoretical considerations by Margalef (1968), Johnson’s model states that a benthic community can exist in either an immature, early stage of succession, or later, mature stages of succession, which develop in an orderly, predictable fashion from the former state. Destructive physical disturbances of the environment will downgrade a community to its earliest successional state, following which it can gradually return to maturity through processes involving an increase in species diversity, increase in inert organic matter and biogenic structures, and decrease in fluctuations of population size. Stratigraphic sections of sediments with repeated environmental disturbances should contain communities showing repetitive successional events, each beginning with a downgrading following a disturbance. Johnson (1972: 155) considered the way succession would proceed when organisms recolonize a bottom following destructive events such as ashfall or storm-sedimentation. A newly deposited sediment is a relatively homogeneous habitat. As organic detritus accumulates at the sediment-water interface, the animals rework it into the underlying sediment. Through their feeding and burrowing activities, the sediment becomes increasingly heterogeneous on a small scale. The particle size, composition, and stability of the sediment may be altered . . . In addition, the activities of micro-organisms must profoundly affect the chemical environment. The accumulation of shells and burrows would further add to the heterogeneity of the infaunal environment . . . These modifications of the sediment must be accompanied by faunal changes. We would expect that the attractiveness of the substrate to settling larvae would change .. . In the beginning, species diversity would be low in the relatively homogeneous sediment. As the sediment becomes progressively more heterogeneous, providing more microhabitats, diversity should rise. Comparison of the model with Ludlow faunal profiles Fig. 25 shows a small-scale vertical profile of the M. /aevigata Association which is interrupted by two bentonite beds. From this profile, we may note the following. 1. Density of shells per surface area of sediment immediately above the bentonites is in one case the same, and in one case higher than immediately below bentonites and in other parts of the section. 2. Species diversity immediately above both bentonites is not lower than in other parts of the section. 3. Species content immediately above a bentonite does not differ from that immediately below, either in the species present or the relative abundance of their individuals. The two bentonites do not divide the faunal profile into two repetitive faunal cycles. The small-scale example shown in Fig. 25 is a detail of the larger faunal profile for the Wood- bury Quarry section (Fig. 17). Again, in the larger section, there is no evidence of repetitive cyclical development of diversity and faunal patterns relating to bentonites. This same relation is seen in several other sections, shown in Figs 16, 21, 22 and 23. Storm-deposited beds of siltstone also appear to have no downgrading effect upon Ludlow communities. In Fig. 10, for example, note that sample 4A37, immediately above a storm-silt bed, does not show lower species diversity than samples 4A39, 4A40 and 4A42, which were taken from bioturbated sediment several centi- metres above such storm-silts. It is not possible to detect any downgrading or repetitive succession in Ludlow communities caused by bentonites or storm-deposited silts. The sedimentary record above such beds indicates an apparent immediate recolonization by the same species, often with the same quantitative proportions of individuals, as existed before the destructive event. However, some initial biotic conditioning of sediment, as discussed by Johnson (1972), must have preceded this recolonization. Rates of reworking by macrofaunal burrowers could produce substantial modifications of the 246 R. WATKINS sediment within days (Rhoads 1963), and chemical changes caused by micro-organisms may be as rapid. If a succession from micro-organisms to macro-burrowers to epifaunal assemblages can occur within days or weeks, it would probably be undetectable in a stratigraphic section. The key aspect of this problem is rate of shelf sedimentation. Apart from storm events, sedimentation rate on the Ludlow shelf was probably much slower than the time required for a sediment- conditioning type of succession. If such sediment-conditioning affected the order of arrival of shelled colonists, slow sedimentation rate would insure that virtually all successive arrivals were preserved in the same few millimetres of strata. m DENSITY RELATIVE ABUNDANCES OHH +4 100 % DIVERSITY - / t | on I ae) S son (eo) \ re A a O jee ~ ® = eu), | ' fo) = ie Cc H 3) | ie) H — =fy cae ee 1 — = ° iS 4 ov H a - e 0 nrARAWOVUCO BWOWOS 107 is shelis70.lm° | 92 14 26 39 29 Il 42 27 28 30 9 50 paises Fig. 25 Detail of the Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association in section 3A, Lower Bringewood Beds, Woodbury Quarry. Note the lack of relation of faunal patterns and the diversity curve to the two intervals of faunal destruction. Metre readings locate this profile in the larger section shown in Fig. 17. Lithological and faunal symbols are explained in Figs 14 and 15. Stratigraphic variation within communities Variation within distal versus proximal shelf environments As discussed in a previous section (p. 239), a basic identity is given to each of the Ludlow associa- tions by a stratigraphic interval in which species content remains generally the same, and relative abundances of most species fluctuate back and forth. This pattern represents variation within a community during the relatively long-term persistence of certain major environmental conditions. In the proximal shelf, coquinoid siltstone facies, variations in relative abundances are extreme, and occur unpredictably in stratigraphic sections, literally centimetre by centimetre. This has been related to opportunistic strategies of reproduction in the dominant species within this environment. A contrasting pattern is seen in the mudstone facies and bioturbated siltstone facies, which repre- sent distal shelf environments of lower physiologic stress. Here, many brachiopod species of the G. obovata and M. laevigata Associations show gradual stratigraphic cycles in abundance, in which the relative abundance of a species in any particular sample can generally be predicted from information on its abundance in samples above and below. These fluctuations occupy several metres of strata, and may relate to time spans of hundreds or thousands of years. They are not related to bentonites, as will be discussed later, and occur within very uniform bioturbated silt and clay. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 247 Johnson’s model of succession Johnson (1972: 152) has expressed this problem as follows. We do observe changes in species composition in modern communities without any noticeable change in the overall physical environment. Similarly, we commonly observe changes in continuous strati- graphic sequences that are not accompanied by any obvious change in lithology. Some of these may be the result of the vagaries of recruitment. More often such faunal changes probably are the result of the ecological interactions involved in succession. Although Johnson’s concept of succession has been shown to be inapplicable to the preserved faunal record relative to Ludlow bentonites and storm-silt beds, it must still be tested against those fluctuations which do occur in Ludlow communities. According to the model, successions seen in stratigraphic sections would involve faunal repetitions, each consisting of an ordered serial set of successional stages. Following some type of environmental disturbance, the community at a particular site would be downgraded to its earliest serial stage of succession. According to John- son (1972) and Walker & Alberstadt (1975), this stage would be characterized by low species diversity, and dominated by a small number of those species of the community which are most eurytopic, or capable of existing outside the community’s habitat. If the disturbing event does not persist, and the environment returns to some optimal condition, the model states that the com- munity would undergo succession through progressively more mature stages, eventually reaching some sort of climax and equilibrium state. Walker & Alberstadt (1975: fig. 1) have indicated some of the expected events in such a succession. For our purposes, the two most important are an increase in species diversity and an increased representation of ‘characteristic species’, that is, relatively stenotopic forms which are generally restricted to the particular community in question. We will compare this model with the stratigraphic profile of the M. /aevigata Association in Woodbury Quarry (Fig. 17), which shows many fluctuations in brachiopod species involving the regular increases and decreases in relative abundance of each species described earlier. The critical point is whether the stratigraphic fluctuations of each species relate to one another in the ordered, repetitive manner predicted by the model. First, consider some ‘characteristic species’, restricted wholly or mainly to the M. laevigata Association: E. radiatus (taxon 49 in Fig. 17), ‘Schuchertella’ sp. (taxon 36), S. euglypha (taxon 30), A. funiculata (taxon 27), M. laevigata (taxon 29) and L. filosa (taxon 28). All show cyclical patterns of abundance in the stratigraphic section. Next, consider those species which are present in the M. laevigata Association, but also commonly occur in other communities (‘ubiquitous’ and ‘intergrading’ species of Johnson 1972): D. hybrida (taxon 20 of Fig. 17), A. reticularis (taxon 42), Isorthis (taxon 22) and S. wilsoni (taxon 39). If the stratigraphic variation within the M. Jaevigata Association conformed to the model of succession, we would see the following repeated pattern: 1. A stage with low species diversity and high abundance of taxa 20, 22, 39 and 42; 2. Gradual increase in species diversity accompanied by appearance of the ‘characteristic’ taxa listed above; 3. An interval of highest diversity con- sisting mainly of equitable abundances of the ‘characteristic’ taxa; 4. A downgrading of the com- munity to the first stage and repetition of the succession. No such pattern is apparent in the faunal profile in Fig. 17. The ‘intergrading’ and ‘ubiquitous’ species in the M. Jaevigata Association do not reach maximum abundances which, according to the model, would precede the appearance of the ‘characteristic’ species. The ‘characteristic’ forms are not restricted to stratigraphic intervals of highest species diversity of the community. In summary, neither the specific faunal sequence nor the repetitive aspects predicted by the model are apparent in the M. Jaevigata Association of Woodbury Quarry (Fig. 17). A similar situation can be seen in other faunal profiles in Figs 19-22. The stratigraphic variations within the M. laevigata and G. obovata Associations are probably not the result of repetitive ecological succession. A model of temporal variation in larval recruitment In the quotation presented earlier, Johnson (1972) noted a second explanation for fluctuations in community composition within a stratigraphic section under the phrase ‘vagaries of recruitment’. 248 R. WATKINS Studies of the recruitment of modern shallow communities in Danish waters show less randomness in this process than might be supposed, and provide a basis for constructing a model to test in stratigraphic sections. Coe (1957), Johnson (1970) and Parker (1975) showed that temporal variations occur in shallow marine communities over periods of several years with no observed correlative change in the en- vironment. The most extensive series of observations documenting this phenomenon are those of Blegvad (1925, 1928), who monitored the composition of shallow communities in the Danish Limfjord between 1910 and 1927. Blegvad’s data show that although the species composition at particular sites remained relatively constant over this period, the densities of individuals of each species (and thus, their relative abundance) varied considerably. During certain successive years, densities of particular species remained low, and in other successive years, densities increased to some highest value before falling. Graphic presentation of these data by Blegvad (1925, 1928) shows no evidence of repetitive ecological succession relating to the fluctuations of species. Blegvad (1928) found that fish predation affected the temporal pattern of the fluctuations, but noted no other influences of biotic interaction or benthic environmental change. The number of planktic larvae in the water column was the major factor associated with the fluctuations in abundance of each species. Blegvad (1928) observed that times of high density of benthic individuals of a particular species correlated with maxima of its planktic larvae in the preceding spawning season, and that periods of low benthic density correlated with preceding paucity of planktic larvae. He also noted that the amount of planktic larvae of a species was not directly related to the density of reproducing benthic individuals. Spawning of low-density benthic populations could result in either low or high numbers of larvae found in the water column, etc. Thorson’s (1950) summary of larval development provided explanations for many of the em- pirical observations of Blegvad. Thorson (1950: fig. 2) showed that temporal variations in species with long planktic larval lives were greater than in species with short larval lives or direct develop- ment. He noted that larvae spending several weeks in the water column are affected by a number of purely pelagic environmental factors. These include losses within the larval population because of predation, fluctuations in their food supply of phytoplankton and movement away from suitable settling areas by currents. Such factors can affect the recruitment of benthic populations in the absence of change within the bottom environment. Two important aspects of the Danish studies form a model for evaluating stratigraphic profiles of fauna. 1. In the modern examples, fluctuation in larval settlement and consequent benthic densities is not random. Several successive years of low larval numbers and small benthic populations alternate with several successive years of high larval densities and larger benthic populations. 2. Discrete events in the bottom environment or the size or presence of benthic populations are not the only factors influencing larval recruitment. Environmental factors in the water column, and not the bottom environment, may form a first-order control on the size of the larval population available for settling. Comparison of the larval model with Ludlow sections Species fluctuations in stratigraphic profiles of the M. laevigata and G. obovata Associations conform with the larval model in showing a lack of relation to bentonites, which represent dis- crete disturbances of the bottom environment. Note the cycles of relative abundance shown by Protochonetes minimus (taxon 26) in Fig. 25. Between 4-5 and 6m in the section, P. minimus shows a cycle of high abundance. A bentonite caused a faunal destruction within this interval, but did not affect the cycle, for P. minimus maintains a nearly equal, high abundance both below and above the bentonite. Between 6 and 11 m in the section (Fig. 25), P. minimus shows a constant, low abundance. A second bentonite in this interval also fails to affect the occurrence of the species, which retains an equal, low abundance both below and above. Identical relations can be seen for many other brachiopod species in Figs 17, 22 and 25. Definite cycles of high and low abundances of particular species in the stratigraphic sections are virtually independent of the stratigraphic position of the bentonites. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 249 These relations show that the stratigraphic fluctuations of species are independent of discrete changes in the bottom environment. They also show that presence of benthic populations of adults was not a necessary prerequisite for the settling of larvae of a particular species at the same site. Abundant adult populations, smothered by bentonites 2-5 cm thick, are followed by abun- dant larval settlement above the bentonite, without the possibility of direct attractive influence of pre-bentonite populations upon post-bentonite settlement of larvae. The best explanation for these phenomena, provided by the modern model, is that stratigraphic fluctuations in Ludlow species were controlled primarily by pelagic influences on larval survival, and not by benthic populations or events. Brachiopod species in Ludlow distal shelf facies show a general stratigraphic pattern in which several metres of low-abundance occurrences alternate with intervals of higher abundance. No repetitive or successional relation is seen between the fluctuations of one species and those of others. This compares closely with the temporal patterns in modern species observed by Blegvad (1925, 1928). An important point, however, is the difference in time scale between Blegvad’s observations and the probably longer spans of species fluctuations in the Ludlow sections. Walker & Bambach (1971) have emphasized that untransported assemblages of shells in fine-grained sedi- ment represent a ‘time-averaged’ sample of many generations of individuals which lived at the same site. The fluctuations observed by Blegvad occurred only over several years, and the total pattern he observed of high and low abundances over 17 years would probably be preserved as a single averaged assemblage in a few mm of slowly-deposited distal shelf sediment. In spite of time-averaging, the cumulative effect of the type of fluctuation observed by Blegvad could be expressed in a stratigraphic section if the net average of fluctuations over a period of several hundreds or thousands of years differed from the average in a succeeding long period of time. The model of pelagically-controlled larval effects provides a better explanation for the strati- graphic variations within Ludlow distal shelf communities than a model of ecological succession within the bottom environment. The time-scale of fluctuations seen in the Ludlow communities is not comparable with that known in modern examples. It is proposed, however, that time- averaging of fossil assemblages would grossly preserve, rather than completely obscure, the larvally-related temporal variation known in modern communities. Biotic interaction in Ludlow communities Predation The foregoing analysis of stratigraphic patterns in Ludlow communities has reached negative conclusions regarding the existence of ecological succession, which implies a lack of the type of organism interactions and feedback which are an integral part of succession (Margalef 1968). Limited evidence does exist, however, for some direct interaction in Ludlow communities. One type of interaction is predation, evinced by a type of small, circular boring found in one valve of Amphistrophia funiculata and two of Nuculites antiqua. Indirect evidence, considered below, suggests that predation may have played a larger role in the structure of Ludlow communities. In modern marine communities, predators are known to have an important function in damping temporal fluctuations in densities and equalizing competition for space among prey species (Blegvad 1928; Paine 1966). Jackson (1972) found a correlation between low-diversity bivalve communities with low predation rates, and high-diversity, offshore bivalve communities experienc- ing higher rates of predation from a greater number of predatory taxa. Jackson suggested that high rates of predation generally contribute to higher diversities in level-bottom communities. Apart from rare asteroids, potential predators among the Ludlow fauna of the Welsh Border- land include cephalopods, gastropods and phyllocarid crustaceans. The diversity of these groups increases toward the lower parts of the Ludlow column, in the distal shelf facies with higher diversity bottom communities (see Jones & Woodward 1888-89 and Blake 1882, as well as data in Appendix 3). Ludlow communities may therefore show a correlation between predator diversity and diversity of prey species, like that discussed by Jackson (1972). Highest and most constant rates of predation in Ludlow distal shelf environments might also have contributed to the 250 R. WATKINS relatively predictable, low-amplitude fluctuations of brachiopod species. These suggestions, though tantalizing, must remain tentative on the basis of present data. Encrustation The chief form of biotic interaction recorded in Ludlow faunas is encrustation, primarily of brachiopods, gastropods and cephalopods by a number of bryozoans, serpulids, cornulites, auloporids and boring organisms of unknown affinity. Some of these organisms can be seen on examples of Isorthis orbicularis (Pl. 5, fig. 1) and Protochonetes ludloviensis (P\. 5, fig. 2). Pre- liminary observations of encrustation show little selectivity of host shells by encrusting organisms. They are overwhelmingly found on the external surfaces of shells, suggesting that many settled when the host was alive. Within samples, 1% or fewer of brachiopod and mollusc shells are encrusted and the lowest frequencies of encrustation occur in the G. obovata Association. Under favourable conditions, the use of organisms by other organisms as hard substrates can produce enough interaction to result in an ordered ecological succession. Shafer (1970) has de- scribed such a case in modern seas, and Walker & Alberstadt (1975) described a succession involving encrusting relations in the Ordovician. Encrustation within Ludlow shelf communities never reached the intensity of interaction in which an ecological succession could proceed. This was probably because of continual sedimentation, ensuring that the hard substrates provided by brachiopod and mollusc shells were always isolated and only temporarily available for coloni- zation. Were Silurian communities depth-related ? Depth relations in modern benthic communities Before summarizing the conclusions and general implications of the analysis of Ludlow shelf faunas, it is appropriate to consider the question of the depth relation of Silurian communities, which has coloured palaeoecological study of this period since the work of Ziegler (1965). In exhaustive studies of the environmental relations of modern benthic communities, Dérjes (1972) and Parker (1975) have shown that water depth is only one of a large number of factors which correlate with community distributions. Dérjes (1972) identified bottom morphology, grain size, sedimentation processes, relation to wave base and food supply as important influences on shelf communities off Georgia. Parker (1975) demonstrated statistical correlations between community distributions and current strength, grain size, turbulence, chemical state of the bottom and light penetration in Hadley Harbor, Massachusetts. These studies show that many of the environmental factors relating to modern benthic commu- nities revolve around the dynamic state of the sediment bottom. Where such conditions parallel bathymetry, and sedimentary facies zones are orientated parallel to the coastline, modern communities tend to occur in similar depth-related bands (Dérjes 1971, 1972). Where zones of similar sedimentary facies and hydrographic conditions are not parallel to the coastline or bathymetric contours, benthic communities show a similar lack of depth relation (D6rjes et al. 1969, 1970). These observations provide an important model for depth evaluation of ancient communities. They show that consistent depth relations of benthic communities are not intrinsic, but may be either present or absent, depending on the distribution of a complex of hydrographic factors. Upper Llandovery communities of the Welsh Borderland Ziegler (1965) and Ziegler et al. (1968a, 1968b) presented a picture of five communities occurring in consistent depth-related bands in the Upper Llandovery of Wales and the Welsh Borderland. Recent work on the sedimentology of these deposits by Bridges (1975) indicates that the depth relations of these communities is not as consistent as has been supposed. For C, times, Ziegler et al. (1968b: fig. 13) showed the control for their parallel bands of communities in a small area between Wenlock Edge and the Breidden Hills. Bridges (1975: fig. 11A) has shown that this area BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 251 did not possess an even bathymetric gradient, but included a southward-facing peninsula on the site of the Long Mynd. A Lingula Community lived east of this peninsula in the shallow sands of a restricted marine embayment. Pentamerus and Stricklandia Communities on the southern and western sides of the peninsula lived on open marine sands. Bridges’ data suggest that position landward or seaward of the Long Mynd peninsula was the most important factor relating to community distribution. By C; to C, times, the Welsh Borderland shelf possessed a fairly even bathymetric gradient with coarse to fine-grained sediments occurring in parallel bands away from the shoreline (Bridges 1975). The shelf communities at this time were also arranged in subparallel bands (Bridges 1975 : fig. 11B), and the community distributions shown by Ziegler et al. (1968b: fig. 14) were probably closely related to bathymetry. This situation follows from the modern observations, which show that depth-related conditions of sedimentation will result in depth-related community distri- butions. General depth relations in Silurian communities Like modern marine communities, those of the British Upper Llandovery appear to show variable relation to water depth, according to the orientation of sedimentation conditions. They do not provide evidence for any intrinsic depth zonation of Silurian bottom faunas, and their use as “bathymetric standards’ for the Silurian (Boucot 1975) is fallacious. The relation between bathymetry and sedimentation conditions in determining Silurian com- munity distributions can be shown by a comparison between a terrigenous shelf and a carbonate platform brachiopod association. The Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association of the Welsh Borderland occupied terrigenous bottoms probably under several tens of metres of water. This depth range is indicated by the position of the community in the distal shelf end of Ludlow stratigraphic gradients, resemblance of its enclosing sediment to modern, offshore shelf deposits and the total absence of any nearby shoreline (Holland & Lawson 1963). Hurst (19755: table 3) has described brachiopod assemblages of nearly identical generic content to the M. laevigata Association from the Ludlow-age Eke Beds of Gotland. The Eke Beds were deposited on a car- bonate platform, and consist of argillaceous limestone with abundant calcareous algae. They underlie and possibly grade laterally into the Burgsvik Sandstone, a probably intertidal deposit. The Eke Beds can thus be considered as very shallow in nature, deposited beneath waters of possibly only a few metres in depth. This example shows that similar generic associations of Silurian brachiopods lived at shallower depths on carbonate platforms than on terrigenous shelves. In the Welsh Borderland, the M. laevigata Association occupied an environment of relatively quiet water and low sedimentation rate. These conditions were met with in an offshore, relatively deep situation in the terrigenous shelf setting. On the carbonate platform of Gotland, however, such conditions of sedimentation appear to have occurred in much shallower water, because of the reduced influence of terrigenous sediment influx. Thus, the Gotland counterpart of the M. /aevigata Association could inhabit shallower absolute depths. Both the example given above and the review of British Upper Llandovery communities given here are completely in keeping with modern observations on communities and water depths. All community distributions relative to water depth, whether parallel or oblique to bathymetric contours, are essentially ‘special cases’ related to the local sedimentation and hydrographic conditions. Silurian communities may or may not be related to water depth, depending onthese factors, and faunal data alone cannot be used to make bathymetric correlations between different times and places. Summary and implications of Ludlow community organization The environmental gradient and composition of fauna Ludlow sections in the Welsh Borderland record a slow, terrigenous progradation over a marine shelf, interrupted locally by carbonate deposition. A general trend of shallowing, increase in grain 252) R. WATKINS size and sedimentation rate, increase in shell transport and increase in frequency and intensity of storm-sedimentation events is apparent from the base to the top of the Ludlow column. Except for carbonate interruptions, the Ludlow sections represent a vertically superposed gradient from distal shelf to proximal shelf environments. A shoreface environment is not preserved. Articulate brachiopods are dominant in number of individuals, but not of species, through the broad range of shelf environments, decreasing in diversity from the distal to proximal shelf. Only in relatively high-stress shelf environments is the abundance of articulate brachiopods approached or surpassed by that of other groups. These environments include deoxygenated distal shelf muds, rapidly-deposited proximal shelf silts and the brackish-water facies of the Downtonian. Bivalves are locally abundant in distal shelf muds and proximal shelf silts, but generally com- prise a small proportion of individuals within communities. They decrease in diversity along the distal to proximal shelf gradient, with distal shelf communities characterized by very sporadic occurrence of a large number of bivalve species. Gastropods also decrease in diversity from distal to proximal shelf communities. They are consistently present, but seldom abundant. Cephalopods are represented by pelagic and nektobenthic forms. Pelagic forms are abundant in distal shelf sediments, while nektobenthic forms are found in consistent low abundance through the whole shelf transect, and were probably predators. Corals, bryozoa and crinoids show a preferential occurrence in distal shelf silts, where sedi- mentation was slow, but periodic agitation occurred. They decrease in abundance into proximal shelf silts with relatively high sedimentation rates, and also become rare in distal shelf muds. Trilobites are most abundant and diverse in distal shelf muds, but extend in low abundance across the full range of shelf environments. Minor groups of arthropods, annelids, echinoderms and small conoidal shells occur sporadically through various communities. Trophic structures in Ludlow shelf communities indicate a mixture of deposit feeding and suspension feeding, with both abundant infauna and epifauna. Except where bryozoa and crinoids were common, little stratification occurred among the epifauna, and most suspension feeding probably occurred 0-2 cm above the substrate. Dominance of physical factors in Ludlow community organization The physical environment appears to have been paramount over biotic factors in shaping com- munity patterns within Ludlow sections. The basic number and level of discreteness of Ludlow communities is a product of the history of environmental change. Long-term persistence of major sedimentary and hydrographic conditions produced extended stratigraphic intervals with rela- tively constant faunal content. Shorter intervals of environmental change produced subordinate stratigraphic intervals of faunal alteration and gradations between communities. An alternation of these phenomena produced the major stratigraphic pattern of Ludlow communities in the Welsh Borderland. Stratigraphic variation occurs within communities in parts of sections representing stability in major environmental conditions. This variation does not lead to any progressive biological accom- modation or increase in species diversity, and does not correspond to models of ecological succession. It consists of extreme and unpredictable fluctuations in the abundance of individuals of species in proximal shelf communities. In distal shelf environments, the intracommunity varia- tion occurs mainly as lower amplitude, predictable cycles in abundance of species. These cycles are independent of faunal destructions represented by bentonites and storm-deposited silts. The cycles of one species do not consistently relate to those of others, or to any consistent patterns in diversity variation. The total pattern of temporal variation within communities does not conform to the repetition involved in ecological succession. Environmental influences upon the survival of pelagic larvae, and not events or interactions in the bottom environment, are the best model for intracommunity variation in Ludlow sections. Except for minor sediment conditioning, ecological succession was probably precluded in Ludlow shelf environments by a lack of biotic control over the physical environment. Continued sediment dilution of benthic populations would have prevented the concentrated use of other BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 253 organisms as substrates, and confronted newly-recruited larvae, on the average, with the same type of sediment bottom occupied by their parents. Sediment dilution of organic remains would preclude the inheritance of accumulated biological information, as discussed by Margalef (1968), which is necessary for new generations to proceed beyond the organizational state of their pre- decessors. In this situation, only a change in the external environment can cause an alteration of community structure. U LLANDOVERY WENLOCK LUDLOW RPRIDOE Ross Brook Fm. Wenlock clastics Whitcliffe Beds Jones Creek Fm. Nova Scotia Britain Britain New Brunswick 0 50% ft) 40% 0) 50% 0 70% SST Fares Fae l lh lenis lis al 2 F&- WS 3 S, A GG iz! | ' om aon é! AM -OM -O1 5 © | «@ | otHers fi otHerS [x otHersS | ess a ee ed A B C D Fig. 26 Local examples of the Salopina Parallel Communities. Column B shows inferred life positions, and columns A, C and D show ventral views of the pedicle valve; low abundances are exaggerated to 2%. A -—‘mixed Salopina conservatrix — Eocoelia Communities’ of Watkins & Boucot (1975); B— Salopina Community of Calef & Hancock (1974); C — Protochonetes ludloviensis Association of this report; D—Salopina submedia Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975). 1 — Salopina conservatrix (McLearn); 2 — S. lunata (Sowerby); 3 —S. submedia (McLearn) ; 4 — Pro- tochonetes tenuistriata (Hall); 5 — P. ludloviensis Muir-Wood; 6 — Protochonetes sp.; 7 — ‘Camaro- toechia rossonia McLearn; 8 —‘Camarotoechia’ spp.; 9-—‘C.’ nucula (Sowerby); 10— Eocoelia sulcata (Prouty); 11 — E. angelini (Lindstrém); 12 — Howellella elegans (Muir-Wood); 13 — Howell- ella sp.; 14 — Orbiculoidea sp.; 15 — O. rugata (Sowerby). The Ludlow fauna corresponds to the stability-time hypothesis in showing highest species diversity in the low-stress distal shelf environment. Rollins & Donahue (1975) have used such diversity relations to infer the existence of biological accommodation in such communities, a type of biotic interaction which can lead to progressive niche-partitioning and diversity increase. As Ludlow communities of distal shelf environments show no increase in diversity with temporal persistance of low-stress conditions, and do not show a successional pattern in cycles of species, they were probably not biologically-accommodated. If predation was important in the high- diversity communities, as suggested in the biotic interaction section, p. 249, it contributed to an overall stability in diversity and not a general increase. 254 R. WATKINS An alternative explanation for high diversity in distal shelf environments is a simple corre- spondence of their physical conditions to the physiologic optima of the largest set of Ludlow shelf species. This relation has been expressed by Gibson & Buzas (1973) as the ‘carrying capacity’ of a particular environment, which remains constant through time. LOWER LLANDOVERY UPPER LLANDOVERY WENLOCK} LUDLOW | PRIDOLI Gee Pa ie Salopina Gee Pa ie Communities = L Nova Scotia — {Ontario England Maine New Brunswick RARIFIED NUMBER OF BRACHIOPOD SPECIES ul Pifepapels |e]? pepe we fa | eile Fig. 27 Species diversity in parallel communities of the proximal shelf region. Each point represents a single sample, rarified to a diversity value at 50 individuals. In the list of data sources for this and following figures, ‘USNM’ indicates the number of a United States National Museum collection for which brachiopod data have been provided to the author by A. J. Boucot. These unpublished data are available on request. 1 - Manitoulin Dolomite, USNM 11582, 11584, 11585; 2 — Brass- field Limestone, USNM 11643; 3 — Beechhill Cove Formation, the Cryptothyrella Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 4 — Beechhill Cove Formation, the Mendacella Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 5— Middle Member of Ross Brook Formation, the Eocoelia Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 6 - Upper Member of Ross Brook Formation, the Eocoelia Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 7 — Clemville Formation USNM 11107, Sodus Shale USNM 12018, Hickory Corners Limestone USNM 11897; 8 — Damery Beds, USNM 10217; 9 - Upper Member of Ross Brook Formation, the mixed Salopina conservatrix — Eocoelia Communities of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 10—Klinteberg Beds, Hurst (19755); 11 — Moydart Formation, the Salopina submedia —‘Camarotoechia’ aff. planorugosa Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 12- Whitcliffe Beds, the Protochonetes ludloviensis Association of this report; 13 — Pembroke For- mation, the Salopina submedia and Protochonetes Communities of Watkins & Boucot (1975); 14 — Jones Creek Formation, Newbury Volcanic Group, Ames Knob Formation and Pembroke Formation, the Salopina submedia Community of Watkins & Boucot (1975). This discussion leads to the conclusion that both high diversity and low diversity communities in Ludlow sections were essentially under the external control of the physical environment. Physical environmental changes were necessary to effect any major change in faunal composition, population patterns or diversity of the shelf fauna. In Ludlow sections, changes in bottom type, sedimentation patterns and hydrographic conditions were the physical factors which exerted most influence upon fauna. In the absence of such changes, the same set of species continued colonizing the accumulating sediment bottoms, with pelagically-influenced variation in larval recruitment. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 255 Consequence of physical control of Silurian shelf communities The simple physically-controlled organization inferred for Ludlow shelf faunas has general implications for the Silurian record. There appears to be no intrinsic biotically-controlled change within Ludlow shelf communities. The consequence of this type of organization is expressed +—— Wenlock is [UG atouw 4 WENLOCK LS. MULDE BEDS BRINGEWOOD BEDS EKE BEDS THIRD LAKE FM BRITAIN GOTLAND BRITAIN GOTLAND MAINE 0 30% 0 20% 0 20% 0 20% 0 30% 1 Li | 2 ® Hi 1 ® SS 3 @® | 4 @® | 5 Reais haw 5 ® a 5 ® | 5 &® | 6 i) | 7 wastes 7CO ff 7 eC) Ef ww | Ol wie o 24m "Oe Ba | ZAfls Op) < Hits \ Goalies Cy “| =I Esscnsorngn 4 ak Dae 2%u @ fF oTHeERS oTHERS i oTHERS i oTHeERS oTHeRS Sa a ———— ——— oon eS A B C D E Fig. 28 Local examples of the Stropheodontid Parallel Communities, using data from A, Hurst (1975c); B, D, Hurst (19755); C, this report; and E, USNM 11357, 11364, 11630. 1 - Jsorthis clivosa Walmsley; 2-— TJ. crassa (Lindstr6m); 3 — J. canaliculata (Lindstrém); 4 — TJ. cf. arcuaria (Hall & Clarke); 5- Dalejina hybrida (Sowerby); 6-— Dalejina sp.; 7— Mesopholidostrophia laevigata (Sowerby) ; 8 — Brachyprion sp.; 9 — Mesopholidostrophia sp. ; 10 — Strophonella euglypha (Hisinger) ; 11 — Amphistrophia funiculata (M’Coy); 12 — A. cf. funiculata (M’Coy); 13 — Protochonetes minimus (Sowerby); 14 -‘Chonetes’ jerseyensis Hall; 15—Leptaena depressa (Sowerby); 16 — Gypidula galeata (Dalman); 17 — Gypidula lata Alexander; 18 — Gypidula sp.; 19 — Atrypa reticularis (Lin- naeus); 20 — Eospirifer radiatus (Sowerby); 21 — Striispirifer striolatus (Lindstr6m) ; 22 — Delthyris sp.; 23 — Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni (Sowerby) ; 24 — Ancillotoechia bidentata (Hisinger) ; 25 — ‘Camaro- toechia’ nucula (Sowerby) ; 26 — Ferganella sp. 2 ® Of throughout Silurian time as relatively steady-state levels of diversity within level-bottom com- munities. Parallel communities (Thorson 1957) are characterized by recurrent associations of genera on a nearly world-wide scale, and are well developed among Silurian brachiopods (Boucot 1975). Within Silurian proximal shelf faunas, a replacement from Lower Llandovery through to Pridoli 256 R. WATKINS times occurs from the Cryptothyrella Communities through Eocoelia Communities to Salopina Communities (Watkins & Boucot 1975). Some local examples of the Salopina Communities, including the P. /udloviensis Association of the Welsh Borderland, are shown in Fig. 26, and pro- vide an illustration of the parallel community phenomenon. Like the P. /udloviensis Association, other local examples of these communities show a low diversity of brachiopods. This diversity pattern is shown in Fig. 27, and remains quantitatively stable throughout the Silurian. stricklandiid : eh BN stropheodontid Communities Communities WENLOCK - UPPER LLANDOVERY WENLOCK LUDLOW LUDLOW 4 ee See N o = on ul RARIFIED NUMBER OF BRACHIOPOD SPECIES S (=) Quebec England Gotland New Brunswick England Gotland Fig. 29 Species diversity in the Stricklandiid and Stropheodontid Parallel Communities. Each point represents a single sample, from: 1-—La Vieille Formation USNM 11450, Val Brillant Quartzite USNM 11133; 2—Wych Beds, the Costistricklandia Community of Ziegler et al. (19686); 3— Wenlock Limestone, the Jsorthis clivosa Community of Hurst (1975c); 4— Mulde Beds, Hurst (19755); 5— Third Lake Formation USNM 11357, 11364, 11630, Mascarene Series USNM 11917; 6—Lower Bringewood Beds, the Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association of this report; 7 — Hemse Beds, Hurst (19755); 8 — Eke Beds, Hurst (19755). More diverse distal shelf or carbonate platform communities, like the M. /aevigata Association, also exist as parallels throughout the Silurian. In the Llandovery, local examples are often dominated by stricklandiids (Ziegler et al. 1968a), and in the post-Llandovery, stropheodontid brachiopods are one of the characteristic forms. The Stropheodontid Parallel Communities show striking similarities between different areas and times, and are illustrated in Fig. 28. Diversity of these communities is plotted in Fig. 29, and also shows a general stable level throughout Silurian time. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 257 The Dicoelosia Communities are another group of parallel associations among Silurian brachiopods. This suite of dominantly distal shelf, muddy bottom communities has been named the Dicoelosia—Skenidioides Community Group by Boucot (1975), and is represented by the G. obovata Association in the Ludlow of the Welsh Borderland. Although brachiopod diversity in these communities is highly variable, a plot through Silurian time shows a general stability in number of species present (Fig. 30). LOWER U. LLAND.- Meseivovn eo EPERELEANDOVERY: | Wennoci WENLOCK LUDLOW N (=) a ul = (=) uo RARIFIED NUMBER OF BRACHIOPOD SPECIES Gotland Nevada Fig. 30 Species diversity of the Dicoelosia Parallel Communities. Each point represents a single sample, from: 1 —-Gasworks Mudstone USNM 10509, siltstone near Meifod, Temple (1970), limestone bands at Keisley, Temple (1968); 2- C, to C, age beds, USNM 10259, 10260, 10514, 10512, 10272, 10257, 10258; 3 - Umur-Dere-Folge (A III 3), USNM 10678, 10679, 10681, 10686; 4-—Lower Visby Beds, Hurst (19755); 5-—Pointes-aux-Trembles Formation, USNM 11173, 11490, slates at Lac des Eaux Mortes USNM 11194; 6-— Perham Formation 11174, 13029, Dennys Formation USNM 11850, 11870; 7— Upper Visby Beds, Hurst (19755); 8 — Hogklint Beds, Hurst (19755); 9 — Hidden Valley Dolomite, USNM 12879, 13617, 17417; 10 - Woolhope Limestone, Eoplectodonta duvalii Community of Hurst (1975c); 11— Wenlock Limestone, E. duvalii Community of Hurst (1975c); 12 — Middle Elton Beds, Glassia obovata Association of this report; 13 — Roberts Mountains Formation, Johnson et al. (1976). The steady-state diversities within Silurian shelf communities of brachiopods through tens of millions of years has been previously discussed by Boucot (1975). It provides direct evidence that biological accommodation leading to progressive diversity increase did not occur in either low diversity or high diversity communities through Silurian time. The phyletic evolution in Silurian brachiopods must therefore have primarily involved niche replacements within stable community structures, rather than niche diversification or partitioning. The analysis of Ludlow shelf faunas 258 R. WATKINS in the Welsh Borderland suggests that this long-term stability of community structure resulted from a primary control of faunal patterns by the external physical environment. Acknowledgements I am grateful to J. M. Hurst for invaluable encouragement through this project, and joint partici- pation in the study of Jsorthis. I also wish to thank C. J. Aithie, W. B. N. Berry, A. J. Boucot, A. Hallam, A. P. Heward, R. A. Hewitt, J. G. Johnson, M. Lockley, W. S. McKerrow, R. M. Sykes and A. Williams for help in many ways. £200 toward the work was provided by the Burdett- Coutts Foundation of the University of Oxford, and facilities for preparing the manuscript were made available by the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley. Appendix 1. Location of measured sections Area 1. Millichope Section 1B. This section is 4°1 m thick, in an old quarry on a hillside due N of Holloway Farm, SO 53608944. It is entirely within the Upper Leintwardine Beds (Shergold & Shirley 1968), and sample numbers 1Bl—1B6 were assigned. Section 1C. This section is 8-1 m thick, in very low, overgrown exposures on W side of a lane bordering Millichope Park, 126m south of junction of this lane with Holloway to Upper Millichope road, SO 52888900. Samples 1C1—1C2 were collected from the Upper Leintwardine Beds, and samples 1C3-1C8 from the Lower Leintwardine Beds. Section 1D. 3:9 m of strata measured in a small quarry on N side of Holloway to Upper Millichope road, directly opposite house at entrance to Millichope Park, SO 52748911. Assigned to the Lower Bringe- wood Beds (Shergold & Shirley 1968). Samples 1D1-1D10 were collected. Section 1E. 15:8 m of strata measured in stream section on NE side of Holloway to Upper Millichope road near Upper Millichope, between SO 52048959 (base of section) and SO 52128943 (top of section). The section is within the Middle Elton Beds, and samples 1E1—1E16 were collected. Area 2. Ludlow Section 2A. 0:6 m of strata measured on N bank of ‘Ludford Lane’, 106 m W of its junction with the A49, SO 51157413. Sample 2A1 is from the Ludlow Bone Bed, and 2A2 and 2A3 from the underlying Upper Whitcliffe Beds. Section 2B. 10:4 m of strata measured at loc. 6 of Holland et al. (1963), the type section for the Upper Whitcliffe-Lower Whitcliffe boundary, SO 50967414. Samples 2B1-2B7 were collected from the Upper Whitcliffe Beds, and 2B8-2B9 from the Lower Whitcliffe Beds. Section 2C. 23:8 m of strata measured at locs 3 and 8 of Holland ef a/. (1963), including the type boun- daries for the bases of the Lower Whitcliffe Beds and Upper Leintwardine Beds, SO 50717428 (base of section) to SO 50717425 (top of section). Samples 2C1—2C9 were collected from the Lower Whitcliffe Beds, 2C10-2C15 from the Upper Leintwardine Beds and 2C16-2C19 from the Lower Leintwardine Beds. Section 2D. 17:8 m of strata measured at loc. 30 of Holland ef al. (1963), the type section for the Lower Leintwardine-Upper Bringewood boundary, SO 49537255. Samples 2D1-2D11 were collected from the Lower Leintwardine Beds, 2D12-2D15 from the Upper Bringewood Beds. Section 2E. 3:4 m of strata measured in a small cutting on S side of the Whitcliffe Spur Road, and in low dip exposures immediately adjacent. Section at W border of landslip, SO 47227376. It is within the Upper Bringewood Beds, and samples 2E1—2E3 were collected. Section 2F. 5:1 m of strata measure on N side of forestry track in Mary Knoll Valley, at type section for Lower Bringewood—Upper Elton boundary (Holland er al. 1963: fig. 12), SO 48737292. Samples 2F1-2F3 were collected from the Lower Bringewood Beds, and 2F4—2F5 from the Upper Elton Beds. This section is very poorly exposed, and the boundary of these units was covered at the time of obser- vations. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 259 Section 2G. 0-9 m of strata measured in small exposure on S side of Old House Road at loc. 30 of Lawson (19736), SO 48327257. This exposure is in the Upper Elton Beds, and was assigned sample number 2G1. Section 2H. 2:6 m of strata measured in small cutting on N side of Hazel Coppice Road, at W end of loc. 27 of Lawson (1973), SO 47597350. The section is in the Upper Elton Beds, and sample numbers 2H1-2H4 were assigned. Section 2I. 3-6 m of strata measured in cutting at junction of forestry roads on W side of High Vinnals, loc. 70 of Lawson (19736), SO 47507161. The section is in the Middle Elton Beds, and samples 211-216 were collected. Section 2J. 7-2 m of strata measured in deep double-sided cutting on S side of Goggin Road at loc. 69 of Lawson (19736), SO 47437171. The section is near the base of the Middle Elton Beds, and samples 2J1—2J12 were collected. Area 3. Woodbury Quarry Section 3A. A single section, 163 m thick, measured in Woodbury Quarry, from SO 74256363 (top of section) to SO 744637 (base). Samples 3A1—3A26 were collected from the Whitcliffe Beds, 3A27—3A29 from the Upper Leintwardine Beds, 3A30-3A48 from the Lower Leintwardine Beds, 3A49-3A51 from the Upper Bringewood Beds and 3A52-3A120 from the Lower Bringewood Beds. All units but the Whitcliffe Beds were being actively quarried, and the amount of Lower Bringewood Beds exposed from time to time varied. Small faults, of undetermined displacement, occur at 65°87 m and 71°45 m above base of section. Area 4. Ledbury Section 4A. 52°5 m of strata measured at N end of Frith Wood, in section described by Penn et al. (1971 : fig. 9). The base of this section, SO 72304024, is located at SW corner of junction of forestry tracks named Top Walk and Godwin’s Rise. From this point, the section was measured downhill (SW) along S bank of Godwin’s Rise, for 280 m along this track; top of section SO 72064011. Samples 4A1-4A26 were collected from the Whitcliffe Beds, 4A27-4A29 from the Upper Leintwardine Beds, 4A30-4A54 from the Lower Leintwardine Beds and 4A55-4A58 from the Upper Bringewood Beds. Section 4B. 77-6 m of strata measured in old quarry on N side of Knapp Lane, from SO 71403857 (base of section) to SO 71313858 (top), immediately outside Ledbury. Samples 4B1-4B26 were collected from the Lower Bringewood Beds and 4B27-4B35 from the Upper Elton Beds. Several small faults, of un- determined displacement, occur between 36 m and 55 m above base of section. Section 4C. 58 m of strata measured at loc. 22 of Penn et al. (1971 : fig. 8), in NE bank at junction of two lanes, SO 71523857. This section is in the Middle Elton Beds, and samples 4C1-4C4 were collected. Area 5. Perton : Section 5A. 6:1 m of strata measured in southernmost of series of old quarry faces S of Perton, on E side of Perton Lane, SO 59694031. This section is shown at loc. 2 by Curtis et al. (1967: fig. 5). It is in the Upper Whitcliffe Beds, and samples SA1—5A6 were collected. Section 5B. 2:9 m of strata measured in small cutting on E side of Perton Lane, immediately S of where a footpath meets the lane, SO 59674033. This section is shown as loc. 3 by Curtis et al. (1967 : fig. 5). It is in the Lower Whitcliffe Beds, and samples 5B1-—5B3 were collected. Section 5C. 13:5m of strata measured in overgrown exposures in E bank of Perton Lane, from SO 59694024 (top of section) to SO 59614013 (base). Samples 5C1-5C5 were collected from the Lower Whitcliffe Beds, 5C6-5C8 from the Upper Leintwardine Beds and 5C9-5C13 from the Lower Leintwardine Beds. The Upper Leintwardine Beds in this section are shown as loc. 4 by Curtis et al. (1967: fig. 5), at SO 59634018. Section 5D. 18-4 m of strata measured in Perton Quarry, on the main W face (PI. 3, fig. 2) and an upper SW face immediately adjacent, SO 59523995. Samples 5D1-5D10 were collected from the Lower Leint- wardine Beds, and 5D11-5D12 from the Upper Bringewood Beds. Section 5E. 15:4 m of section measured S of Perton Quarry, in discontinuous exposures in E bank of Perton Lane from SO 59583992 (top of section) to SO 59613977 (base). This section is in the Lower Bringewood Beds, and samples 5E1—-S5E10 were collected. 260 R. WATKINS Section 5F. 2:7 m of strata measured in small exposures in both E and W banks of Perton Lane imme- diately NW of farmhouse at Copgrove, SO 59643964. This section is in the Lower Bringewood Beds, and samples 5F1—5F3 were collected. Section 5G. 7-4 m of strata measured in small cutting and other limited exposures in W bank of lane between Tower Hill and Wootton, at a bend in lane at SO 59253950. This section is shown as loc. 7 by Curtis e¢ al. (1967: fig. 5). Sample 5G1 was collected from the Lower Bringewood Beds and 5G2-5G7 from the Upper Elton Beds. Section 5H. 7:6m of strata measured in E bank of lane between Tower Hill and Wootton at SO 59223940. This section is in the Upper Elton Beds, and samples 5H1—5H7 were collected. Section 5I. 38:6 m of strata measured in E bank of lane between Tower Hill and Wootton, between SO 59223935 (top of section) and SO 59233918 (base). These exposures are interrupted by the drive into Tower Hill Cottage (which is not actually on Tower Hill). The section is in the Middle Elton Beds, and samples 511-5129 were collected. Appendix 2. Reliability of faunal sampling Definitions and procedures As discussed earlier, density measurements are not adequate for standardization of palaeontological samples from a variety of sedimentary facies, and counts of numbers of individuals (as defined in methods section, pp. 178-9) have been used for this purpose. Samples processed for this project represent a variety of rock volumes and vary in content from 10 to 700 individuals. In the following discussions, ‘sample size’ refers exclusively to the number of individuals per sample. Representative sample sizes are given in Appendix 3, Tables 17-20. Most samples contained 50-75 individuals. e total fauna ©000000000000004 ee ee ee oeecccese - brachiopods 000092800 00000000004 000000000000 Gg eG Dooeiy eeeeceeeese et eseeeeeeeee eee ees One ee) elerele eleleiareleicle(cle.eie i” eeeccceee of feeee 000000000°°° °F ° 900 000000° CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF SPECIES 0 100 200 300 0 100 200 0 100 200 300 CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS Fig. 31 Relation of number of individuals counted to number of species obtained in single samples. A-sample 4A7, Protochonetes ludloviensis Association; B—sample 4A44, upper phase of Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association; C — sample 4B31, ‘transition fauna’; D — sample 4C1, Glassia obovata Association; E— sample from the Lower Leintwardine Beds at Chance’s Pitch (SO 750402), upper phase of S. wi/soni Association; F — sample 4A29, Shaleria ornatella Association; G — sample 4A28, S. ornatella Association. Relation of sample size to measured properties of samples was evaluated by the following method. In each of eight large samples from a variety of communities and sediments, all fossil specimens were listed in the order in which they appeared on fissile surfaces during processing of the rock. This order of appear- BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 261 ance is considered random. From such lists, the content of each sample was calculated separately at 10- individual intervals for sample sizes ranging from 10 to over 240 individuals. The data were used to con- struct curves for each sample showing changes in measured properties with change in sample size. This procedure is the basis for the following discussions. e all species Dp species <2% abundance o species >5% abundance B species >2% abundance ~ ~e~e_ O00 USO = ~o-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-8=6=8= ™Ss 8 eee ee oe ee 0 100 200 0 100 200 X SAMPLE SIZE (number of individuals) Fig. 32 Percentage of unrecorded species at different sample sizes, where 240 individuals are arbitrarily considered to yield 100% of species. These curves are based on data in Fig. 31. The sampling error, Y, was calculated as follows: samples A, B, C, E, F, & G of Fig. 31 yielded 104 total species at sample sizes of 240 individuals (62 species <2% relative abundance, 42 species >2%, 23 species >5%). At counts of 10, 20, 30 individuals, etc., the number of species recorded in these samples was divided by the number at 240 individuals. This value was then subtracted from 100% to obtain Y. See text for discussion of results. (% of unrecorded species) Y SAMPLING ERROR Presence/absence criteria for species Fig. 31 shows the increase in number of species obtained with increasing sample size. Beyond 200 indi- viduals, most species curves remain constant or increase at a very slow rate. The number of species obtained at 240-individual sample size was arbitrarily assigned a value of 100% for comparison with species numbers in smaller samples. Results of this procedure are given in Fig. 32. Species with relative abundances above 5%, which include those used for the characterization of communities, were obtained at all sample sizes above 70 individuals. Rarer species, especially those comprising less than 2% of fauna in samples, had a much poorer rate of recovery (Fig. 32). Failure to record these species at sample sizes below 200 individuals is not conclusive evidence of their absence from any given area of rock. Measurement of relative abundance Relative abundances for each form within samples are defined, as a percentage, as the number of indi- viduals of the form divided by the total number of individuals in a sample. Fig. 33 shows the relation between increasing sample size and measurements of relative abundance. Relative abundance values for each species show fluctuations within the same sample between sample sizes of 10 and 150 individuals, and stabilize above 200 individuals. Absolute stabilization is not seen in the curves, however, and measure- ment of relative abundance beyond the nearest 1% is not valid for even the largest samples used here. The following method was used to compare the reliability of relative abundance measurements at different sample sizes. The error in measurement of the relative abundance of any species is arbitrarily set at 0 in a sample size of 200 individuals. The difference between the relative abundance for a species in a 200-individual sample and its relative abundance at any other sample size is d. Twenty-one species, all with relative abundances over 5%, were used in calculating d values at 24 sample sizes from 10 to 240 individuals. The average error in relative abundance, specific for a particular sample size, is designated as Y, and calculated as: 262 R. WATKINS OTHERS : OTHERS OTHERS “YOtti ding canelis ee ee oe ell? elegans ga Ne egg, wilsoni Salopina lunata Shaleria ornatella os Se PI Protochonetes ludloviensis f ’ Camarotoechia nucula RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF TAXA 100 200 300 0 100 200 0 100 200 CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS [o) 100 % OTHERS OTHERS Protochonetes minimus Howellella elegans 50 % Protochonetes (udloviensis es Isorthis clivosa Isorthis clivosa RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF TAXA 0 100 200 300 0 100 200 0 100 200 CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS Fig. 33 Relation of increasing sample size to the measurement of relative abundances. A — sample from Chance’s Pitch; B—sample 4A28; C—sample 4A29; D—-sample 4C1; E-—sample 4B31; F — sample 4A7. es 21 Plots of Y values against sample size are shown in Fig. 34. As an absolute value, the average error in measurement of relative abundance per species is 3°% or less at sample sizes above 50 individuals. These results indicate that once a species has been recorded in samples above this size, the measurement of its relative abundance is fairly accurate. Appendix 3. Faunal lists The following tables present a small part of the quantitative faunal data which form the basis for this | study. The full data are deposited in the Library of the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell | Road, London. They comprise 54 typewritten sheets giving faunal counts for 417 samples in the measured sections. These data should be consulted by anyone wishing to make comparisons with the community analysis presented here. Tables 17-20 are extracts from the complete data, and show the format used. Tables 15 and 16, which follow, record the total faunal content of each Association, based on total counts for all their assigned samples. These tables tell nothing of the variability within the associations, BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES ror in relative abundance Y average per species er- (% of individuals) X sample size (number of individuals) 263 Fig. 34 Average error in measurements of relative abundance, based on calculations discussed in text. The curve was constructed for species whose relative abundances are above 5%. The error in measuring relative abundances for rarer species would fall below the curve. and should not be taken as a ‘fixed’ definition of an association. Tables 17—20 give selected sample-by- sample data for some of the major associations, and provide examples of the basic data used in construct- ing the graphic faunal profiles. Table 15 Cumulative faunal content for samples assigned to the following associations: Gol —G. obovata (laminated shale facies); Go2—G. obovata (mudstone facies); tr — transition fauna; Ml- M. laevigata; \pSw — lower phase of S. wilsoni; AC — A. reticularis — coral. Species marked with an asterisk are considered to be pelagic, and their numbers are not included in the final total of individuals Association ANTHOZOA Favosites cf. forbesi (Edwards & Haime) Rhabdocyclus porpitoides (Lang & Smith) solitary trochoid corals syringoporid BRYOZOA BRACHIOPODA Aegiria grayi (Davidson)* ambocoelid Amphistrophia funiculata (M’Coy) Atrypa reticularis (Linnaeus) ‘“Camarotoechia’ nucula (J. de C. Sowerby) Coolinia pecten (Linnaeus) Craniops implicata (J. de C. Sowerby) Cyrtia exporrecta (Wahlenberg) Dalejina hybrida (J. de C. Sowerby) Dayia navicula (J. de C. Sowerby) Delthyris sp. Dicoelosia biloba (Linnaeus) Eospirifer radiatus (J. de C. Sowerby) Gol Go2 tr MI IpSw AG 1 te 1 = 34 100 285 122 3 = 11 = 312 347 102 23 4 D 52 : 170 # 3 1 264 R. WATKINS Table 15 continued Association Gol Gasconsia sp. ud Glassia obovata (J. de C. Sowerby) 27 Gypidula lata Alexander - Howellella elegans (Muit-Wood) 1 Hyattidina canalis (J. de C. Sowerby) - Isorthis clivosa Walmsley = Isorthis orbicularis (J. de C. Sowerby) = Kirkidium knightii (J. Sowerby) = Leangella segmentum (Lindstré6m) = Leptaena depressa (J. de C. Sowerby) and Lepidoleptaena sp. - Leptostrophia filosa (J. de C. Sowerby) = Lingula lata J. de C. Sowerby* 1 Lingula lewisii J. de C. Sowerby - Lingula n. sp. - Ludfordina pixis Kelly - Meristina obtusa (J. de C. Sowerby) - Mesopholidostrophia laevigata (J. de C. Sowerby) — Nucleospira pisum (J. de C. Sowerby) - Orbiculoidea rugata (J. de C. Sowerby) = Parastrophinella sp. 35 Plagiorhyncha sp. 10 Protochonetes ludloviensis Muir-Wood - Protochonetes minimus (J. de C. Sowerby) 2 ? Protozeuga sp. = Resserella sabrinae nunfieldensis Hurst 3 Resserella sp. = Rhynchospirina sp. = Salopina lunata (J. de C. Sowerby) - “Schuchertella’ sp. - Shagamella ludloviensis Boucot & Harper* - Shaleria ornatella (Davidson) - Skenidioides lewisii (Davidson) 1 Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni (J. Sowerby) - Strophonella euglypha (Hisinger) - indeterminate rhynchonellides = indeterminate spiriferides - indeterminate brachiopods 4 GASTROPODA Bellerophon baccatus Reed - Bembexia lloydii (J. de C. Sowerby) - Bucanopsis expansus (J. de C. Sowerby) - Cymbularia cf. fastigata (Lindstré6m) 6 Euomphalus sp. - gastropod sp. A 2 gastropod sp. B - Leptozone striatissima (Salter) = Loxonema sinuosa (J. de C. Sowerby) 18 murchisoniacean sp. B - Oriostoma sp. - platyceratacean sp. A - pleurotomariacean sp. A - pleurotomariacean sp. B 1 — |nleOon il ue {wl wool Bw! BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 265 Table 15 continued Association Gol Go2 tr MI IpSw AC Sinuspira stokei (Longstaff) 4 2D = ae = BS Sphenosphaera sp. 3 Temnodiscus salopiensis Reed = 1 = indeterminate bellerophontaceans - 1 1 indeterminate high-spired gastropods = = 4 indeterminate gastropods 6 48 5 BIVALVIA Actinopteria sowerbyi (M’Coy) - 2 - 2 1 “4 I bivalve sp. A - bivalve sp. B 1 bivalve sp. C - bivalve sp. F - = Buchiola sp.* 3 - Butovicella migrans (Barrande)* 13 9 Cardiola interrupta (J. de C. Sowerby)* 10 21 Conocardium sp. - 1 9 [envi | Cypricardinia subplanulata Reed - “Cyrtodonta’ perovalis (Salter) - cyrtodontid sp. A - Dualina striata (J. de C. Sowerby)* 6 12 Goniophora cymbaeformis (J. de C. Sowerby) - 12 grammysid sp. A - 35 Grammysioidea sp. - - Leptodesma ampliata (Phillips) - 2 Modiolopsis consors Reed - 4 2) Inne fl Ww | Nol e|l | —y le NNWRK NO = | Beco] eRFPKeNwWe | OWN! Modiolopsis solenoides (J. de C. Sowerby) - modiomorphid sp. A - modiomorphid sp. B - modiomorphid sp. C - modiomorphid sp. D - modiomorphid sp. E - modiomorphid sp. F - Myitilarca siluriana Reed — Nuculites antiqua (J. de C. Sowerby) - Nuculites pseudodeltoideus Reed - Nuculites woolhopensis Reed Orthonota rigida (J. de C. Sowerby) = Orthonota sp. A = Palaeopecten danbyi (M’Coy) = “Paracyclas’ insueta Reed - Praectenodonta ludensis (Reed) 1 Praenucula sp. 9 9 Preronitella retroflexa (Wahlenberg) - Ptychopteria tenuistriata (M’Coy) = = Sedgwickia amygdalina (J. de C. Sowerby) - = Similodonta sp. = Slava fibrosa (J. de C. Sowerby)* 3 indeterminate pteriaceans - 2 indeterminate bivalves 7 i Peninieni o1rFnwoil nw I | —_ Lnohl by wool | Oo | \o S 1 nn — | 1 kBUDPW | 1 ne | | a a ae | | 1 CEPHALOPODA “Cyrtoceras’ laevis (J. de C. Sowerby) - 16 1 - - - Cyrtocycloceras tenuiannulatum (M’Coy) 1 7 1 6 1 - 266 R. WATKINS Table 15 continued Association Gol Cyrtocycloceras tracheale (J. de C. Sowerby) 6 Dawsonoceras annulatum (J. Sowerby) - Kionoceras caniculatum (J. de C. Sowerby) 4 Kionoceras sp. B = ‘Orthoceras’ dimidiatum (J. de C. Sowerby)* x ‘Orthoceras’ gregarium (J. de C. Sowerby)* x Phragmoceras sp. = ? Polygrammoceras bullatum (J. de C. Sowerby) —- indeterminate cephalopods = TRILOBITA Calymene sp. - Dalmanites myops (K6nig) 25 Encrinurus n. sp. - Hemiarges sp. Leonaspis coronata (Salter) Otarion megalops (M’Coy) Phacops sp. Proetus astringens Owens Proetus obconicus (Lindstr6m) = Raphiophorus parvulus (Forbes) 2 indeterminate trilobites - lL —wW | PHYLLOCARIDA Ceratiocaris sp. - INCERTAE SEDIS Conularia sp. - Cornulites serpularius Schlotheim - Hyolithes forbesi (Sharpe) - Tentaculites tenuis (J. de C. Sowerby) - TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 192 TOTAL SAMPLES 18 Table 16 Cumulative faunal content for samples assigned to the following associations: upSw — upper phase of S. wilsoni; So —S. ornatella; P| —P. ludloviensis. Within each association, samples have been grouped into two taphonomic categories: d— disturbed neighbourhood assemblages; t — transported assemblages. Species marked with an asterisk are considered to be pelagic, and their numbers are not included in the final total of individuals Association upSw Taphonomic category ANTHOZOA solitary trochoid coral BRYOZOA BRACHIOPODA Atrypa reticularis (Linnaeus) ‘Camarotoechia’ nucula (J. de C. Sowerby) 412 Q ° Ns} XX WNNY N com ! upSw d 579 So Nl = y= | — 367 AC pp BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES Table 16 continued Association Taphonomic category Craniops implicata (J. de C. Sowerby) Dayia navicula (J. de C. Sowerby) Dolerorthis sp. Eospirifer radiatus (J. de C. Sowerby) Howellella elegans (Muir-Wood) Hyattidina canalis (J. de C. Sowerby) Isorthis clivosa Walmsley Isorthis orbicularis (J. de C. Sowerby) Leptaena depressa (J. de C. Sowerby) and Lepidoleptaena sp. Leptostrophia filosa (J. de C. Sowerby) Lingula lewisii J. de C. Sowerby Orbiculoidea rugata (J. de C. Sowerby) Protochonetes ludloviensis Muir-Wood Salopina lunata (J. de C. Sowerby) Shagamella ludloviensis Boucot & Harper* Shaleria ornatella (Davidson) Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni (J. Sowerby) indeterminate spiriferides GASTROPODA Bembexia lloydii (J. de C. Sowerby) Bucanopsis expansus (J. de C. Sowerby) Cyclonema corallii (J. de C. Sowerby) Euomphalus sp. murchisoniacean sp. A Oriostoma sp. platyceratacean sp. A platyceratacean sp. B indeterminate bellerophontaceans indeterminate high-spired gastropods indeterminate gastropods BIVALVIA Actinopteria sowerbyi (M’Coy) bivalve sp. D bivalve sp. E Cardiola interrupta (J. de C. Sowerby)* Conocardium sp. Cypricardinia subplanulata Reed Cypricardinia sp. A Dualina striata (J. de C. Sowerby)* Goniophora cymbaeformis (J. de C. Sowerby) grammysid sp. B Grammysioidea sp. Modiolopsis complanata (J. de C. Sowerby) modiomorphid sp. A Mytilarca siluriana Reed Nuculites antiqua (J. de C. Sowerby) Orthonota rigida (J. de C. Sowerby) Palaeopecten danbyi (M’Coy) “Paracyclas’ insueta Reed Pteronitella retroflexa (Wahlenberg) Wun 1 wml — fon) —_ On! Pel ee | = So fos i =U Ha Th SS = OVER NN G2 | Nw I Ge | — Pl 267 ies) | Nel i LArPNRF OF = | ie.) \o 268 R. WATKINS Table 16 continued Association upSw. upSw So So Pl Pl Taphonomic category t d t d t d Ptychopteria tenuistriata (M’Coy) 5 8 3 10 3 66 Sedgwickia amygdalina (J. de C. Sowerby) 3 33 9 16 18 165 Similodonta sp. - = - 1 - - indeterminate bivalves 6 8 3 3 4 12 CEPHALOPODA Ascoceras vermiforme Blake - - - - - 2 Cyrtocycloceras tracheale (J. de C. Sowerby) 1 - 1 = 2) 5) Kionoceras caniculatum (J. de C. Sowerby) - - 1 - - 1 indeterminate cephalopods 3 8 - 1 28 63 TRILOBITA Acastella spinosa (Salter) - - - 1 - 1 Calymene neointermedia (R. & E. Richter) - = 1 1 - - Calymene sp. 1 - - - - - Encrinurus stubblefieldi Tripp - - - 2 - 2 Homalonotus knightii (K nig) = = = - - 2 Proetus obconicus (Lindstr6m) - 1 1 3 - - indeterminate trilobites 1 1 1 - 1 2 PHYLLOCARIDA Ceratiocaris sp. - - - - 1 3 EURYPTERIDA eurypterid fragment = - - - - 1 INCERTAE SEDIS Cornulites serpularius Schlotheim 6 22 3 3 8 11 Serpulites longissimus J. de C. Sowerby - 1 - - 2; 30 Tentaculites tenuis J. de C. Sowerby 15 8 D 4 - - TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 2607 2352 619 879 2843 4276 TOTAL SAMPLES 36 38 5 11 29 58 Table 17. An example of the Glassia obovata Association in the mudstone facies of the Middle Elton Beds. The samples are from section 1E, Upper Millichope, and provide part of the data upon which Fig. 22 is based. Species marked with an asterisk are considered to be pelagic, and their numbers are not included in the final total of individuals. Authorship of specific names can be found in Table 15 Sample number 1E8 1E9 1210 BM 1212) Els) 1EI4 TES EtG cm above base of section 877 812 732 636 546 421 191 102 0 Vertical thickness of Samplel(en) 23 12 10 15 15 5 20 8 12 ANTHOZOA solitary trochoid coral = = 2 1 S me = = Ay syringoporid - = = = 1 = = a ah BRACHIOPODA Aegiria grayi* 1 725 5800 1880 1580 86 76 215 26 Amphistrophia funiculata - - - 1 - - - = = Table 17 continued Sample number cm above base of section Vertical thickness of sample (cm) BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 1E8 1E9 1E10 JE 1E12 877 812 732 636 546 1E14 269 1E16 = = 3 160 2 Craniops implicata Dicoelosia biloba Eospirifer radiatus Glassia obovata Howellella elegans Isorthis clivosa Leangella segmentum Lingula n. sp. Ludfordina pixis Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Parastrophinella sp. Plagiorhyncha sp. Protochonetes minimus ? Protozeuga sp. Resserella sabrinae nunfieldensis Skenidioides lewisii GASTROPODA Cymbularia cf. fastigata Euomphalus sp. gastropod sp. B Leptozone striatissima Loxonema sinuosa pleurotomariacean sp. B Sinuspira stokei Temnodiscus salopiensis BIVALVIA bivalve sp. B Butovicella migrans* Cardiola interrupta* “Cyrtodonta’ perovalis Dualina striata* Goniophora cymbaeformis grammysid sp. A Leptodesma ampliata modiomorphid sp. D Mytilarca siluriana Nuculites pseudodeltoideus Nuculites woolhopensis Praectenodonta ludensis Praenucula sp. indeterminate pteriaceans indeterminate bivalves CEPHALOPODA “Cyrtoceras’ laevis Cyrtocycloceras tenuiannulatum Cyrtocycloceras tracheale Dawsonoceras annulatum Kionoceras caniculatum 23 12 10 nS 15 8 - 5 5 3 29 4 2 4 7 = 1 x 7 z = - - 2 2 12 12 DD 4 10 4 12 29 9 36 - 12 12 4 9 1 a = 2 = 3 - 7 2 - 1 6 3 3 1 2 = = 4 = pi = 1 4 2 3 bs = 1 Be A pe 2 3 = 1 = S x 2 4 a E = mi = = . 2 1 _ = z = 1 - = 2 z & \ 1 = 1 = = 1 es = = 1 = x s s 2 | 1 3 z a ss 1 & e = = 1 = fe = = 2 1 3 = 1 1 Be = 7 2 3 1 - = 1 2. cs = 1 = 3 1 3 1 = = = — ! | | — WeNoONW | lew! |} w NO a | [(——_— | 270 R. WATKINS Table 17 continued Sample number 1E8 1E9 WENO) el Wel eles eile! iBNS ie cm above base of section 877 812 782 636 546 421 191 102 0 Vertical thickness of sample (cm) 23 12 10 15 15 5) 20 8 12) ‘Orthoceras’ dimidiatum* ‘Orthoceras’ gregarium* ? Polygrammoceras bullatum indeterminate cephalopods* 14 wWensb i= |l ay I] | on La | | | oon = | WO | a al | wo] = | _ i TRILOBITA Calymene sp. = Dalmanites myops 10 Leonaspis coronata - Raphiophorus parvulus - =| BY] iS I a — | O— [ene | le NN fo) [i tcom| WwW PHYLLOCARIDA Ceratiocaris sp. = = = = 2) a 1 it e INCERTAE SEDIS Hyolithes forbesi (Sharpe) = = = = 1 = Ss 1 = TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 88 59 96 236 86 153 68 126 203 Table 18 An example of the Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Association in the calcisiltite facies of the Lower Bringewood Beds. The samples are from section 4B, Ledbury, and provide part of the data upon which Fig. 19 is based. Species marked with an asterisk are considered to be pelagic, and their numbers are not included in the final total of individuals. Authorship of specific names can be found in Table 15 Sample number 4B18 4B19 4B20 4B21 4B23 4B24 4B25 4B26 4B27 cm above base of section 4695 4545 4353 4213 3739 3633 3528 3299 2480 Vertical thickness of 40 0 12 15 56 7 10 16 15 sample (cm) ANTHOZOA solitary trochoid corals - 8 - 1 - - = - 2 BRYOZOA 6 11 8 1 5) 5 3 3 11 BRACHIOPODA Amphistrophia funiculata 5 4 D 1 2 - 2 1 2 Atrypa reticularis 5 3 3 3 Si 7 24 20 5 ‘Camarotoechia’ nucula 3 22 - 4 4 - - - - Craniops implicata - p) 1 - - 1 - - - Cyrtia exporrecta 1 - - - - - - Dalejina hybrida 1 1 - 1 1 - - - - Eospirifer radiatus - 1 - 3 - - 2, - - Gypidula lata - - - 32 2 - - 2; 7 Howellella elegans 14 - - - 1 1 - 2, = Tsorthis clivosa 49 13 12 14 40 14 9 2 BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES Table 18 continued Sample number 4B18 4B19 4B20 4821 cm above base of section 4695 4545 4353 4213 Vertical thickness of 40 0 2 15 sample (cm) Leptaena depressa and Lepidoleptaena sp. 8 Leptostrophia filosa 19 2, 8 oo lune le FI_ nl nw Lingula lewisii Mesopholidostrophia laevigata Orbiculoidea rugata Protochonetes minimus - “Schuchertella’ sp. = Shagamella ludloviensis* 1 Shaleria ornatella - Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni 47 Strophonella euglypha = indeterminate spiriferides - Le! N= ia | BROrFNW ! | GASTROPODA Bembexia lloydii - - Euomphalus sp. 1 - Leptozone striatissima - Loxonema sinuosa - Oriostoma sp. - indeterminate bellerophontacean — indeterminate gastropods - - = 2 J cere |] tela — | | | BIVALVIA Actinopteria sowerbyi — 1 - - bivalve sp. A = - — - bivalve sp. C - - - - bivalve sp. F - 1 - — Cypricardinia subplanulata - - - “Cyrtodonta’ perovalis = = 1 - modiomorphid sp. C - = 1 Orthonota rigida = - - “Paracyclas’ insueta - - - - Ptychopteria tenuistriata - - - — Sedwickia amygdalina - 1 - 3 indeterminate bivalves ] 1 4 CEPHALOPODA Cyrtocycloceras tenuiannulatum - - 1 - Kionoceras sp. B 1 - - - indeterminate cephalopods - - 1 - TRILOBITA Calymene sp. Dalmanites myops Encrinurus n. sp. Proetus astrigens | i | | [(—— | —_ TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 173 WZ 49 186 4B23 3739 56 | (60 = X05] 55 15 [fe Ne wl p= nN) | olrahpril | col vi 4B26 3299 16 | sai yt tre 271 4B27 2480 Nie 272 R. WATKINS Table 19 Examples of the upper phase of the Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni Association (upSw) and Shaleria ornatella Association (So) in the coquinoid siltstone facies of the Lower and Upper Leintwardine Beds. The samples are from section 4A, north of Ledbury, and provide part of the data upon which Fig. 18 is based. Species marked with an asterisk are not included in the final total of individuals; authorship of specific names can be found in Table 16. For taphonomic category of samples: d — disturbed neigh- bourhood assemblage; t — transported assemblage Sample number Association Stratigraphic unit cm above base of section Vertical thickness of sample (cm) Taphonomic category BRYOZOA BRACHIOPODA Atrypa reticularis “Camarotoechia’ nucula Dayia navicula Howellella elegans Hyattidina canalis Isorthis clivosa Isorthis orbicularis Leptaena depressa and Lepidoleptaena sp. Lingula lewisii Protochonetes ludloviensis Salopina lunata Shaleria ornatella Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni GASTROPODA Bucanopsis expansus Cyclonema corallii indeterminate gastropods BIVALVIA Actinopteria sowerbyi bivalve sp. D Cardiola interrupta* Cypricardinia subplanulata Goniophora cymbaeformis modiomorphid sp. A ‘Paracyclas’ insueta Pteronitella retroflexa Ptychopteria tenuistriata Sedgwickia amygdalina Similodonta sp. CEPHALOPODA TRILOBITA Acastella spinosa Calymene neointermedia Proetus obconicus 4A27 So — Le Re RK eK | — 4A28 So | |Nws — 4A29 So N SPAN! Weed! | 4A30 upSw LLB 4257 8 d 4A31 upSw LLB 4144 8 t 4A32 upSw LLB 4056 8 t wl ww] sf ] 4A33 upSw LLB 3959 7 4A34 upSw LLB 3861 2 d 4A35 upSw LLB 3751 6 — Table 19 continued Sample number Association Stratigraphic unit cm above base of section Vertical thickness of sample (cm) Taphonomic category INCERTAE SEDIS Cornulites serpularius Tentaculites tenuis TOTAL INDIVIDUALS BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 49 304 248 4A30 4A31 4A32 4A33 upSw upSw upSw upSw ILJLIB3 TLL TB} ILL N83. LIL 8} 4257 4144 4056 3959 8 8 8 2 d t t t ie 1 iz = 60 50 50 54 4A34 upSw LLB 3861 273 4A35 upSw LLB 3751 Table 20 An example of the Protochonetes ludloviensis Association in the coquinoid siltstone facies of the Lower Whitcliffe Beds. The samples are from section 2C, Ludlow, and provide part of the data upon which Fig. 16 is based. All samples are disturbed neighbourhood assemblages. Authorship of specific names can be found in Table 16 Sample number cm above base of section Vertical thickness of sample (cm) BRYOZOA BRACHIOPODA Atrypa reticularis “Camarotoechia’ nucula Craniops implicata Dayia navicula Isorthis clivosa Lepidoleptaena sp. Lingula lewisii Orbiculoidea rugata Protochonetes ludloviensis Salopina lunata GASTROPODA Bembexia lloydii Bucanopsis expansus platyceratacean sp. A platyceratacean sp. B indet. high-spired gastropods BIVALVIA Dualina striata* Goniophora cymbaeformis Grammysioidea sp. Nuculites antiqua Pteronitella retroflexa Ptychopteria tenuistriata 2Cl1 2349 7 — nn=— | Roy Th ry — = IN! he PNK | 274 R. WATKINS Table 20 continued Sample number 2Cl1 2C2 2C3 2C4 2C5 2C6 2G 2C8 2C9 cm above base of section PISS) RYN) ANS IDS SYS) IGS 7X0) 1 1168 Vertical thickness of sample (cm) Sedgwickia amygdalina - - 1 1 9 6 - indeterminate bivalve = = = ze = nm = CEPHALOPODA Ascoceras vermiforme - = = D) ze Bi ws Cyrtocycloceras tracheale 1 = = = = = = Kionoceras caniculatum - - - = ~ - 1 indeterminate cephalopods - 1 - 1 4 - 1 rT] i || | TRILOBITA Encrinurus stubblefieldi = = = = = = 1 1 - indeterminate trilobite = = 2 = = = = = 1 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 101 51 50 53 54 50 58 54 50 References Alexander, F. E. S. 1936. The Aymestry Limestone of the main outcrop. Q. J/ geol. Soc. Lond. 92: 103-115. Allen, J. R. L. & Tarlo, L. B. 1963. The Downtonian and Dittonian facies of the Welsh Borderland. Geol. Mag., London, 100: 129-155. Bailey, R. J. 1964. A Ludlovian facies boundary in south central Wales. Geol. J., Liverpool, 4: 1-20. —— 1969. Ludlovian sedimentation in south central Wales. In Wood, A. (ed.), Pre-Cambrian and Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Wales : 283-301. Cardiff. —— & Rees, A. I. 1973. A magnetic fabric study of Late Whitcliffian (Upper Silurian) siltstones from the Welsh Borderland. Geol. J., Liverpool, 8: 179-188. Bergstrém, J. 1968. Some Ordovician and Silurian brachiopod assemblages. Lethaia, Oslo, 1 : 230-237. Blake, J. F. 1882. A monograph of the British fossil cephalopods. Part I. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 248 pp. Blegyad, H. 1925. Continued studies on the quantity of fish food in the sea bottom. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Copenhagen, 31 : 30-56. —— 1928. Quantitative investigations of bottom invertebrates in the Limfjord 1910-1927 with special reference to the plaice food. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Copenhagen, 34 : 35-52. Bokuniewicz, H. J., Gordon, R. B. & Rhoads, D. C. 1975. Mechanical properties of the sediment-water interface. Mar. Geol., Amsterdam, 18 : 263-278. Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. 427 pp. Amsterdam. Bowen, Z. P., Rhoads, D. C. & McAlester, A. 1974. Marine benthic communities in the Upper Devonian of New York. Lethaia, Oslo, 7 : 93-120. Brenner, R. L. & Davies, D. K. 1973. Storm-generated coquinoid sandstone: genesis of high-energy marine sediments from the Upper Jurassic of Wyoming and Montana. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 84 : 1685-1698. Bridges, P. H. 1975. The transgression of a hard substrate shelf; the Llandovery (Lower Silurian) of the Welsh Borderland. J. sedim. Petrol., Menasha, 45 ; 79-94. Calef, C. E. & Hancock, N. J. 1974. Wenlock and Ludlow marine communities of Wales and the Welsh Borderland. Palaeontology, London, 17 : 779-810. Calvert, S. E. 1964. Factors affecting distribution of laminated diatomaceous sediments in Gulf of Cali- fornia. In van Andel, T. H. & Shor, G. G. (eds), Marine Geology of the Gulf of California : 311-330. Tulsa (American Association of Petroleum Geologists). Coe, W. R. 1957. Fluctuations in littoral populations. Mem. geol. Soc. Am., Washington, 67 (1) : 935-939. Cummins, W. A. 1959. The Lower Ludlow grits in Wales. Lpool Manchr geol. J. 2: 168-179. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 275 — 1969. Patterns of sedimentation in the Silurian rocks of Wales. In Wood, A. (ed.), Pre-Cambrian and Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Wales : 219-234. Cardiff. Curtis, M. L. K., Lawson, J. D., Squirrel, H. C., Tucker, E. V. & Walmsley, V. G. 1967. The Silurian Inliers of the south-eastern Welsh Borderland. Geol. Ass. Guide, Colchester, 5. 32 pp. Dorjes, J. 1971. Der Golf von Gaeta (Tyrrhenisches Meer). IV. Das Makrobenthos und seine kusten- parallele zonierung. Senckenberg. marit., Frankfurt a.M., 3: 203-246. —— 1972. Georgia coastal region, Sapelo Island, U.S.A. Sedimentology and biology. VII. Distribution and zonation of macrobenthic animals. Senckenberg. marit., Frankfurt a.M., 4: 183-216. , Gadow, S., Reineck, H. E. & Singh, I. B. 1969. Die Rinnen der Jade (Sudliche Nordsee). Sedimente und Makrobenthos. Senckenberg. marit., Frankfurt a.M., 1 : 5-62. 1970. Sedimentologie und Makrobenthos der Nordergriinde und der Auchenjade (Nordsee). Senckenberg. marit., Frankfurt a.M., 2 : 31-59. Ehrlich, P. R., Holm, R. W. & Soule, M. E. 1973. Introductory Biology. 746 pp. New York. Emery, K. O. & Hiilsemann, J. 1962. The relationships of sediments, life, and water in a marine basin. Deep-Sea Res., Oxford, 8 : 165-180. Firsich, F. T. & Hurst, J. M. 1974. Environmental factors determining the distribution of brachiopods. Palaeontology, London, 17 : 879-900. Gadow, S. & Reineck, H. E. 1969. Ablandiger Sandtransport bei Sturmfluten. Senkenberg. marit., Frank- furt a.M., 1: 63-78. Gibson, T. G. & Buzas, M. A. 1973. Species diversity: patterns in modern and Miocene Foraminifera of the eastern margin of North America. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 84: 217-238. Goldring, R. & Bridges, P. 1973. Sublittoral sheet sandstones. J. sedim. Petrol., Menasha, 43 : 736-747. Hallam, A. 1972. Models involving population dynamics. Jn Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleo- biology : 62-80. San Francisco. Hancock, N. J., Hurst, J. M. & Fiirsich, F. T. 1974. The depths inhabited by Silurian brachiopod com- munities. Q. J/ geol. Soc. Lond. 130: 151-156. Havlicek, V. 1967. Brachiopoda of the suborder Strophomenidina in Czechoslovakia. Rozpr. ustred. Ust. geol., Prague, 33. 235 pp. Hawkins, H. L. & Hampton, S. M. 1927. The occurrence, structure, and affinities of Echinocystis and Palaeodiscus. Q. JI geol. Soc. Lond. 83 : 574-601. Holland, C. H. & Lawson, J. D. 1963. Facies patterns in the Ludlovian of Wales and the Welsh Border- land. Lpool Manchr geol. J. 3: 269-288. & Walmsley, V. G. 1963. The Silurian rocks of the Ludlow district, Shropshire. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.), London, 8 : 95-171. & Palmer, D. C. 1974. Bohemograptus, the youngest graptoloid known from the British Silurian sequence. Spec. Pap. Palaeont., London, 13 : 215-236. ——,, Rickards, R. B. & Warren, P. T. 1969. The Wenlock graptolites of the Ludlow district, Shropshire, and their stratigraphical significance. Palaeontology, London, 12 : 663-683, pl. 130. Howard, J. D. & Reineck, H. E. 1972. Georgia coastal region, Sapelo Island, U.S.A. Sedimentology and biology. IV. Physical and biogenic structures of the near-shore shelf. Senckenberg. marit., Frankfurt a.M., 4: 81-123. Hurst, J. M. 1975a. The diachronism of the Wenlock Limestone. Lethaia, Oslo, 8 : 301-314. — 1975b. Some observations on brachiopods and the level-bottom community ecology of Gotland. Geol. Fér. Stockh. Férh. 97 : 250-264. 1975c. Wenlock carbonate level bottom brachiopod-dominated communities from Wales and the Welsh Borderland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol., Amsterdam, 17 : 227-255. — & Watkins, R. 1978. Evolutionary patterns in a Silurian orthide brachiopod. Geologica Palaeont., Marburg, 12: 73-97, 2 pls. Jackson, J. B. C. 1972. The ecology of the molluscs of Thalassia communities, Jamaica, West Indies. IT. Molluscan population variability along an environmental stress gradient. Mar. Biol. Berlin, 14 : 304-337. Johnson, J. G., Boucot, A. J. & Murphy, M. A. 1976. Wenlockian and Ludlovian age brachiopods from the Roberts Mountains Formation of central Nevada. Univ. Calif. Publs geol. Sci., Berkeley, 115 : 1-102, 55 pls. Johnson, R. G. 1970. Variations in diversity within benthic marine communities. Am. Nat., Salem, 104 : 285-300. — 1972. Conceptual models of benthic marine communities. In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology : 148-159. San Francisco. Jones, T. R. & Woodward, H. 1888-89. A monograph of the British Palaeozoic Phyllopoda. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 208 pp. ’ 276 R. WATKINS Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1961. The Silurian Eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland. J. Paleont., Menasha, 35 : 789-835. Krassiloy, V. 1974. Causal biostratigraphy. Lethaia, Oslo, 7: 157-161. Lawson, J. D. 1973a. Facies and faunal changes in the Ludlovian rocks of Aymestrey, Herefordshire. Geol. J., Liverpool, 8 : 247-278. —— 1973b. New exposures on forestry roads near Ludlow. Geol. J., Liverpool, 8 : 279-284. —— 1975. Ludlow benthonic assemblages. Palaeontology, London, 18 : 509-525. —— & Straw, S. H. 1956. The Ludlovian rocks of the Welsh Borderland. Adumt Sci., Lond. 12 : 563-570. Lister, T. R. 1970. The acritarchs and chitinozoa from the Wenlock and Ludlow Series of the Ludlow and Millichope areas, Shropshire. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 100 pp. & Downie, C. 1967. New evidence for the age of the primitive echinoid Myriastiches gigas. Palaeon- tology, London, 10: 171-174. MacArthur, R. H. 1960. On the relative abundance of species. Am. Nat., Salem, 94 : 25-36. Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. 111 pp. Chicago. Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat., Salem, 100: 65-75. Parker, R. H. 1975. The Study of Benthic Communities. 279 pp. Amsterdam. Penn, J. S. W., French, J., Whitten, D. G. A. & Vinnicombe, J. 1971. The Malvern Hills. Geol. Ass. Guide, Colchester, 4. 36 pp. Petersen, C. G. J. 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish food. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Copenhagen, 25 : 1-62. Phipps, C. B. & Reeve, F. A. E. 1967. Stratigraphy and geological history of the Malvern, Abberley and Ledbury Hills. Geol. J., Lverpool, 5 : 339-368. —— —— 1969. Structural geology of the Malvern, Abberley and Ledbury Hills. Q. J/ geol. Soc. Lond. 125 : 1-38. Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1958. British Upper Silurian crinoids from the Ludlovian. Palaeontology, London, 1: 106-115. Reineck, H. E. & Singh, I. B. 1972. Genesis of laminated sand and graded rhythmites in storm-sand layers of shelf mud. Sedimentology, Amsterdam & New York, 18: 123-128. 1973. Depositional Sedimentary Environments. 439 pp. Berlin. Rhoads, D. C. 1963. Rates of sediment reworking by Yoldia limatula in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, and Long Island Sound. J. sedim. Petrol., Menasha, 33 : 723-727. —— & Morse, J. W. 1971. Evolutionary and ecologic significance of oxygen-deficient marine basins. Lethaia, Oslo, 4: 413-428. —— & Young, D. K. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and com- munity trophic structure. J. mar. Res., New Haven, 28: 150-178. Richardson, J. B. & Lister, T. R. 1969. Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian spore assemblages from the Welsh Borderland and south Wales. Palaeontology, London, 12 : 201-252. Rollins, H. B. & Donahue, J. 1975. Towards a theoretical basis of paleoecology: concepts of community dynamics. Lethaia, Oslo, 8 : 255-270. Runnegar, B., Pojeta, J., Morris, N. J., Taylor, J. D., Taylor, M. E. & McClung, G. 1975. Biology of the Hyolitha. Lethaia, Oslo, 8: 181-192, textfigs. Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat., Salem, 102 : 243-282. —— & Hessler, R. R. 1969. Ecology of the deep-sea benthos. Science, N.Y. 163 : 1419-1424. Scott, R. W. 1974. Bay and shoreface benthic communities in the Lower Cretaceous. Lethaia, Oslo, 7: 315-330. Shafer, W. 1970. Aktuopalaontologische Beobachtungen 9. Faunenwechsel. Senckenberg. marit., Frank- furt a.M., 2 : 85-102. —— 1972. Ecology and palaeoecology of marine environments. 568 pp. Edinburgh. Shergold, J. H. & Shirley, J. 1968. The faunal stratigraphy of the Ludlovian rocks between Craven Arms and Bourton, near Much Wenlock, Shropshire. Geol. J., Liverpool, 6: 119-138. Slobodkin, L. B. & Sanders, H. L. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol., Upton, 22 : 82-93. Spencer, W. K. 1914-40. British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 540 pp. Squirrel, H. C. & Tucker, E. V. 1960. The geology of the Woolhope inlier, Herefordshire. Q. J/ geol. Soc. Lond. 116: 139-185. Temple, J. T. 1968. The Lower Llandovery (Silurian) brachiopods from Keisley, Westmorland. Palaeon- togr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 58 pp. —— 1970. The Lower Llandovery brachiopods and trilobites from Ffridd Mathrafal, near Meifod, Montgomeryshire. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 76 pp. BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 277 Thorson, G. 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev., Cambridge, 25 : 1-45. —— 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Mem. geol. Soc. Am., Washington, 67 (1) : 461-534. Valentine, J. W. 1971. Resource supply and species diversity patterns. Lethaia, Oslo, 4: 51-61. Walker, K. R. & Alberstadt, L. P. 1975. Ecological succession as an aspect of structure in fossil communi- ties. Paleobiol., Menlo Park, 1 : 238-257. & Bambach, R. K. 1971. The significance of fossil assemblages from fine-grained sediments: time averaged communities. Abstr. Progm geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, 3 : 783-784. Walther, J. 1894. Einleitung in die Geologie als historische Wissenschaft. 1055 pp. Jena. Warren, P. T. 1971. The sequence and correlation of graptolite faunas from the Wenlock—Ludlow rocks of North Wales. Mém. Bur. Rech. géol. miniér., Paris, 73 : 451-460. Watkins, R. & Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution of Silurian brachiopod communities along the southeastern coast of Acadia. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., New York, 86 : 243-254. Whitaker, J. H. M. 1962. The geology of the area around Leintwardine. Q. JI geol. Soc. Lond. 118: 319-351. Williams, B. J. & Prentice, J. E. 1957. Slump structures in the Ludlovian rocks of north Herefordshire. Proc. Geol. Ass., London, 68 : 286-293. Wood, E. M. R. 1900. The Lower Ludlow Formation and its graptolite fauna. Q. JI geol. Soc. Lond. 56: 415-492. Ziegler, A. M. 1965. Silurian marine communities and their environmental significance. Nature, Lond. 207 : 270-272. ——, Cocks, L. R. M. & Bambach, R. K. 1968a. The composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities. Lethaia, Oslo, 1: 1-27. —, —— & McKerrow, W. S. 1968. The Llandovery transgression of the Welsh Borderland. Palaeon- tology, London, 11 : 736-782. Index An asterisk (*) denotes a figure Acastella spinosa 230, 237, 268, 272 Actinopteria sowerbyi 226, 265, 267, 271-2 Aegiria 220, 226 grayi 211, 236, 263, 268 Amphistrophia 226, 228 funiculata 196, 212, 225*, 248-9, 255, 262-3, 268, 270 Amphiura 209 Ancillotoechia bidentata 255 Anthozoa 263, 266, 268, 270 Ascoceras vermiforme 268, 274 Atrypa 224, 226, 228, 236 reticularis 180-2, 193, 196, 208, 212, 214-6, 218, 225*, 231-2, 234-5, 240, 255, 262-3, 266, 270, 272-3 Aymestrey Limestone 188, 193, 211, 228, 231, 232 Bellerophon baccatus 264 Bembexia lloydii 227, 264, 267, 271 bentonites 185, 201, 211, 244-6, 248 bioturbated siltstone facies 186, 187*, 201, 203, 205, 207, 211, 224, 228, 230, 241, 244 bivalves 178, 196, 201-2, 205-6, 212, 217-20, 230, 234, 237, 265, 267, 269, 271-2 brachiopods 178, 196, 201-2, 205-7, 211-7, 224-6, 228-9, 231, 234, 237, 249-50, 255-7, 260, 263, 266, 268, 272-3; see under genera Brachyprion sp. 255 Bringewood, see Upper, Lower Bringewood Beds bryozoa 179, 196, 201, 212, 222, 224, 226, 229, 231, 235, 237, 250, 263, 266, 270, 272-3 Bucanopsis expansus 237, 264, 267, 272 Buchiola sp. 265 Butovicella migrans 265, 269 calcisiltite facies 188, 224, 228, 230 Calymene 266, 268, 270-1 neointermedia 234, 236, 268, 272 “Camarotoechia’ 198-9, 204, 228-9, 238, 253 nucula 197-204, 212, 228, 233*, 234, 237, 253, 255, 262-3, 266, 270, 272-3 aff. planorugosa 254 rossonia 253 Cardiola interrupta 265, 267, 269, 272 cephalopods 179, 196, 201, 212, 220-1, 235, 237, 249-50, 265, 268-9, 271-2, 274 Ceratiocaris 237, 266, 270 “Chonetes’ jerseyensis 255 Chonetoidea 211 Chondrites 186, 228, 238 Cicerocrinus elegans 238 ‘Clorinda dormitzeri’ 223 Conocardium sp. 265, 267 Conularia 266 conularids 227 278 R. WATKINS Coolinia pecten 263 coquinoid siltstone facies 189-90, 191*, 203, 207, 211, 228, 230, 234, 237, 241, 244, 273 Cornulites 212, 227, 230, 235, 250 sepularius 201-2, 266, 268, 273 Costistricklandia 256 Craniops implicata 263, 266, 269-70, 273 crinoids 212 Cryptothyrella 254-5 Cyclonema corallii 201, 237, 267, 272 Cymbularia 220, 223 cf. fastigata 264, 269 Cypricardinia subplanata 225*, 226, 234, 265, 267, 271-2 Cyrtia exporrecta 262-3, 270 ‘Cyrtoceras’ 222 laevis 265, 269 Cyrtocycloceras 222 tenuiannulatum 265, 269, 271 tracheale 266, 268-9, 274 ‘Cyrtodonta perovalis 265, 269, 271 Dalejina 217, 229, 255 hybrida 181, 212, 225*, 255, 263, 270 Dalmanites 223 myops 181, 212, 222, 225*, 227, 230, 266, 270-1 Dawsonoceras 222 annulatum 266, 269 Dayia 206 navicula 199-202, 212, 228, 263, 266, 272-3 Delthyris sp. 255, 263 Dicoelosia 217, 222, 257 biloba 212, 262-3, 269 Dolerorthis 267 Downtonian 238 Dualina striata 265, 267, 269, 273 Echinocystites pomum 227 Elton Beds 185, 192, 208, 210, 222, 234, 241, 244: see Upper, Middle, Lower Elton Beds Encrinurus 266, 271 stubblefieldi 235-7, 268, 274 Eocoelia 253-5 angelini 253 sulcata 253 Eoplectodonta duvalii 257 Eospirifer 228 radiatus 181, 212, 248, 255, 262-3, 267, 269, 270 Euomphalus sp. 225*, 264, 267, 269, 271 Eurypterida 268 Favosites cf. forbesi 263 Ferganella 255 Gasconsia sp. 264 gastropods 196, 202, 212, 220, 235, 237, 249-50, 264, 267, 269, 271-3 Glassia obovata 180, 203, 205, 208, 210, 212-24, 234, 239-44, 246-8, 250, 257, 260, 262-4, 268-9 Goniophora cymbaeformis 237, 265, 267, 269, 272-3 grammysid sp. 265, 267, 269 Grammysoidea sp. 265, 267, 273 Gypidula 226, 228, 255 galeata 255 lata 181, 196, 212, 255, 264, 270 Hemiarges sp. 266 Homalonotus knightii 237, 268 Howellella 203-4, 217, 226, 228-9 elegans 198, 200-1, 203, 212, 225*, 228, 237, 253, 262, 264, 267, 269-70, 272 Hyattidina 198, 206, 229 canalis 199, 201, 212, 228, 231, 262, 264, 267, 272 Hydrobia 207 Hyolithes forbesi 212, 222, 224, 266, 270 incertae sedis see Conularia, Cornulites, Hyolithes, Serpulites, Tentaculites Introduction 176 isopachytes 177 Isorthis 199, 203-4, 217, 224, 226, 229, 243, 248 cf. arcuaria 255 canaliculata 255 clivosa 196, 203, 212, 225*, 229, 234-6, 255-6, 262, 264, 267, 269-70, 272-3 crassa 255 orbicularis 189-201, 203-4, 212, 228-9, 233*, 234, 236, 250, 264, 267, 272 Kionoceras 222, 266, 271 caniculatum 266, 268-9, 274 Kirkidium 188, 193 knightii 180-2, 264 Leangella segmentum 212, 264, 269 Ledbury 177, 181, 188, 216-7, 224, 228, 231, 259, DID); AD Leintwardine, see Upper, Lower Leintwardine Beds Leonaspis coronata 212, 222, 224, 266, 270 Lepidoleptaena sp. 196, 212, 226, 234, 264, 267, 271-3 Leptaena 226 depressa 196, 212, 234, 255, 264, 267, 271-2 Leptodesma ampliata 265, 269 Leptostrophia 228 filosa 196, 212, 225*, 248, 264, 267 Leptozone striatissima 227, 264, 269, 271 Lingula 205, 251, 264, 269 cornea 238 lata 264 lewisii 264, 267, 271-3 lingulids 212 BENTHIC LUDLOW COMMUNITIES 279 Llandovery, see Upper Llandovery Lower Bringewood Beds 179-80, 184—6, 188, 192, 196, 203, 207-8, 211, 224, 226-8, 234-5, 241, 244, 246, 258-9, 270 Lower Elton Beds 179, 208, 211 Lower Leintwardine Beds 178, 181, 184-5, 188-9, 192-4, 199-201, 203, 208, 211, 228-30, 234-5, 237, 241, 244, 258, 272 Loxonema 220 sinuosa 264, 269, 271 Ludfordina pixis 212, 217, 264, 269 Macoma 209, 236 Mendacella 254 Meristina obtusa 264 Mesopholidostrophia laevigata 180-1, 196, 203, 205-8, 212-5, 217-9, 223-8, 225*, 229-31, 234, 236, 239-48, 251, 255-6, 263-4, 269-71 Methods 176 microbivalves 212 Middle Elton Beds 182, 186, 203, 208, 211, 220-1, 223, 258-9, 268 Millichope 177, 196, 220, 258 Modiolopsis complanata 238, 267 consors 265 solenoides 265 modiomorphid sp. 265, 267, 269, 271-2 molluscs 226-7, 230; see bivalves, &c. Monotrypa 231 mudstone facies 185-6, 187*, 203, 205, 210, 241, 244, 263, 268 murchisoniacean sp. 264, 267 Mpriastiches gigas 222 Mpytilaria siluriana 234, 236, 265, 267, 269 Neobeyrichia lauensis 236 Nucleospira pisum 264 Nuculites 223 antiqua 230, 233*, 237, 249, 265, 267, 273 pseudodeltoides 222, 265, 269 woolhopensis 220, 265, 269 Orbiculoidea rugata 212, 253, 264, 267, 271, 273 Oriostoma sp. 227, 231, 264, 267, 271 Orthida 204 “Orthoceras’ dimidiatum 220, 266, 270 gregarium 220, 266, 270 Orthonota rigida 265, 267, 271 sp. 265 ostracods 212, 235, 237 Otarion megalops 265 Palaeopecten danbyi 205, 265, 267 *Paracyclas’ insueta 230, 265, 267, 271-2 Parastrophinella sp. 212, 217, 223-4, 264, 269 Pentamerida 204, 223 Pentamerus 251 Perton 177-8, 180-1, 188-9, 194, 195*, 218-9, 224, 228, 231-2, 238, 259 Phacops 266 Phragmoceras 266 Phyllocardia 266, 268, 270 Plagiorhyncha sp. 212, 217, 264, 269 platyceratacean sp. 264, 267 Platychisma helicites 238 pleurotomariacean sp. 264, 269 Polygrammoceras bullatum 266, 270 Praectenodonta ludensis 220, 265, 269 Praenucula sp. 220, 223-4, 265, 269 Pridoli 253, 255 Pristiograptus tumescens 224 Proetus astringens 266, 271 obconicus 266, 268, 272 Protochonetes 229 ludloviensis 180, 197-208, 212-6, 218, 229, 233*, 234-5, 237-8, 240-1, 243, 264, 266-7, 272-3 minimus 212, 217, 247, 255, 262, 264, 269, 271 tenuistriata 253 Protozeuga sp. 212, 217, 223-4, 264, 269 Pteronitella retroflexa 230, 237, 265, 267, 272-3 Ptychopteria tenuistriata 237, 265, 268, 271-3 Raphiophorus parvulus 212, 222, 266, 270 Resserella 217, 264 sabrinae nunfieldensis 212, 223, 264, 269 Rhabdocyclus porpitoides 227, 263 rhynchonellids 264 Rhynchospirina 264 Saetograptus leintwardinensis 236 Salopina 198-9, 204, 229, 238, 253-5 conservatrix 253-4 lunata 199-201, 203-4, 212, 233*, 234, 237, 253, 262, 264, 267, 272-3 submedia 253-4 “Schuchertella’ sp. 212, 225*, 226, 228, 248, 264, 269, 271 Sedgwickia amygdalina 197, 230, 237, 265, 268, 271-2, 274 Sedimentology 182 Sericoidea 211 Serpulites 212 longissimus 202, 230, 268 Shagamella ludloviensis 212, 226, 228, 264, 267, 271 shale facies 186, 211, 263 Shaleria ornatella 180, 206-8, 212-6, 218, 234-7, 239-40, 260, 262, 264, 267, 271-2 Similodonta 265, 268, 272 Sinuspira 220 stokei 265, 269 Skenidioides 217, 224, 257 lewisii 212, 262, 264, 269 Slava fibrosa 265 Sphaerirhynchia wilsoni 180-1, 198-201, 203, 205-8, 212-8, 225*, 228-31, 232-5, 233*, 237, 240-1, 243-4, 255, 260, 262-4, 266-7, 271-2 280 R. WATKINS Sphenosphaera 220, 223, Spiriferida 204, 212, 223, stratigraphic pattern 240— Stricklandia 251 stricklandiid 256 Striispirifer striolatus 255 stropheodontids 212, 256 Strophomenida 204, 206, 207, 224 Strophonella 226, 228 euglypha 181, 196, 212, 225*, 248, 255, 264, 271 Syndosmya 236 syringoporid 263, 268 265 264, 267, 271 4 tabulates 179 Temnodiscus salopiensis 265, 269 Tentaculites 212, 227, 230, 235 tenuis 201, 266, 268, 273 trilobites 179, 196, 212, 222, 227, 230, 234, 237, 266, 268, 270-2, 274 Turritella 209 Upper Bringewood Beds 175, 179-82, 185, 188, 192-4, 208, 211, 224, 231-2, 241, 244, 258-9 Upper Elton Beds 182, 184, 186, 208, 211, 224, 226, 259 Upper Leintwardine Beds 182, 184, 189, 192, 208, 211, 234-7, 241, 244, 258-9, 272 Upper Llandovery 250, 253 Urosoma hirudo 227 Venus 209 ‘Visbyella trewerna’ 223 Whitcliffe Beds 178, 184-5, 189-90, 192-3, 197, 202, 207-8, 211, 235, 237-8, 253, 258, 273 Woodbury 177-8, 180-1, 184, 188, 194, 214-5, 224, 226, 228, 231, 238, 242, 246, 248, 259 Accepted for publication 13 March, 1978 British Museum (Natural History) Monographs & Handbooks The Museum publishes some 10-12 new titles each year on subjects including zoology, botany, palaeontology and mineralogy. Besides being important reference works, many, particularly among the handbooks, are useful for courses and students’ background reading. Lists are available free on request to: ee Publications Sales British Museum (Natural History) a Cromwell Road ‘ London SW7 5BD Standing orders placed by educational institutions earn a discount of 10% off our published price. Titles to be published in Volume 31 Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. By J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. By W. J. Kennedy & H.C. Klinger. Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. By R. Watkins. The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian). By C. W. Wright. . The entire Geology series is now available Type set by John Wright & Sons Ltd, Bristol and Printed by Henry Ling Ltd, Dorchester Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian) C. W. Wright “Geology series Vol 31 No4 31 May 1979 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. Subscription orders and enquiries about back issues should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 SBD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) © Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1979 This number completes volume 31 ISSN 0007-1471 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Geology series s Vol 31 No4 pp 281-332. Issued 31 May 1979 The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian) C. W. Wright _ Old Rectory, Seaborough, Beaminster, Dorset DT8 3QY Contents Synopsis . Introduction The Chalk Rock Systematic Descriptions Superfamily Turrilitaceae Meek Family Hamitidae Meek Genus Metaptychoceras Spath Metaptychoceras smithi (Woods) Family Baculitidae Meek 4 : Genus Sciponoceras Hyatt . ‘ Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) Genus Baculites Lamarck Baculites undulatus @ Orbigny Family Anisoceratidae Meek Genus Anisoceras Pictet Anisoceras reidi sp. nov. Genus Allocrioceras Spath Allocrioceras angustum (J. de C. Sowerby) Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. nov. Allocrioceras billinghursti Klinger Allocrioceras (?) cf. cuvieri (Schliiter) Genus Neocrioceras Spath : Subgenus Schlueterella Wiedmann Neocrioceras (Schlueterella) muitinodosum (Schliiter) Family Turrilitidae Meek Subfamily Nostoceratinae Hyatt Genus Didymoceras Hyatt : Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) . Genus Hyphantoceras Hyatt. ; Hyphantoceras reussianum (q@’ Orbigny) Family Scaphitidae Meek . : Subfamily Scaphitinae Meek Genus Scaphites Parkinson . : Scaphites geinitzii d@Orbigny . Scaphites geinitzii geinitzii d’ Orbigny Scaphites geinitzii intermedius Scupin Scaphites geinitzii laevior subsp. nov. Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey Scaphiies lamberti Grossouvre : : Scaphites lamberti doylei subsp. nov. Scaphites diana sp. nov.. 3 : Scaphites pseudoaequalis Yabe Subfamily Otoscaphitinae Wright Genus Ofoscaphites Wright . ' Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) . Otoscaphites reidi sp. nov. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 31 (4) : 281-332 281 305 307 Issued 31 May 1979 282 C. W. WRIGHT Family Desmoceratidae Zittel . 5 ; : ‘ 3 : : . 308 Subfamily Puzosiinae Spath . : : 3 5 : , ; . 308 Genus Puzosia Bayle . : : : F : 59308 Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers ; : : : . 308 Family Pachydiscidae Spath : ; ; ; ; : ; j . SIO Genus Lewesiceras Spath . ; : : : ; 5 Syl) Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright 3 : : F P 5 SW) Lewesiceras woodisp.nov. . ; ; . : : : 5 ull? Genus Pseudojacobites Spath é j ; : : : : esis Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) . ; : : : ; =) 33 Genus Tongoboryoceras Housa_ . : : i a BIG Tongoboryoceras rhodanicum (Roman & Mazeran) : : - a Sil) Family Collignoniceratidae Wright & Wright : 3 4 : : 3 oiilts) Genus Subprionocyclus Shimizu. : : : : . 318 Subprionocyclus hitchinensis (Billinghurst) : : ; ; 6. lls Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) . : : : : : 5 ol Subprionocyclus branneri (Anderson) ; : : : ‘ = 320 Subprionocyclus normalis (Anderson) ; : : . , 321 General results and correlations ; : : ; : P : : 22 Acknowledgements . : ; : : i : ‘ : ; ; 5 avs References ; : ; 5 : 5 : : k , 2 : 2326 Index . ; ; : 3 : ; : : : : ; ; 29 Synopsis The English Chalk Rock fauna of ammonites (Upper Cretaceous, Upper Turonian) is described as an aid to international correlation. It comprises 28 species and subspecies referred to 15 genera. Five new species (Anisoceras reidi, Allocrioceras strangulatum, Scaphites diana, Otoscaphites reidi and Lewesiceras woodi) and 2 new subspecies (Scaphites geinitzii laevior and S. lamberti doylei) are described. Lectotypes are designated of Scaphites geinitzii d’Orbigny, S. g. intermedius Scupin, S. fritschi Grossouvre [= S auritus Fritsch, non Schliiter] and Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers. Pseudopuzosia Spath is placed in the synonymy of Pseudojacobites Spath. Introduction This paper comprises a full description of the ammonite component of the fauna of the Upper Turonian Chalk Rock of southern England, together with some conclusions for correlation. The fauna includes a number of wide-ranging ammonite species and, since they occur together in England in beds representing a relatively short period of time, the fauna is of particular import- ance as a standard of comparison in a stage in which few abundant ammonite faunas are known. The individual study of which this paper describes some of the results has been largely over- taken by the International Geological Correlation Programme Project on Mid-Cretaceous Events and the paper is therefore offered in the context of that project. The Chalk Rock Above the Cenomanian the English Chalk ceases in general to contain many ammonites and it is only at a few narrow horizons that they are at all common. The best-known of these is the Chalk Rock. It is a variable composite hardground or series of hardgrounds (Kennedy & Garrison 1975 and references therein) up to about 4 m thick, but generally less, occurring in the lower part of the Holaster planus Zone, the highest of the three conventional zones of the English Turonian chalk. The upper surface (where it comprises a single bed) and the top of individual hardgrounds (where separate) are irregular, and generally have included in them or immediately above them phosphatized cemented chalk pebbles, often green-coated, and phosphatized fossils. Similar fossils, normally less well preserved and less abundant, may be found lower in the hard- grounds. The fauna is large and varied; its most characteristic elements are lithistid and hexac- AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 283 tinellid sponges and aragonitic molluscs — scaphopods, gastropods, bivalves and cephalopods. Woods (1896-97) described and figured many of them and Billinghurst (1927) described further species of ammonites. In recent years much collecting has been done, particularly at Billinghurst’s locality of Hill End Farm, Hitch Wood near Hitchin, at Reed near Royston and at Kensworth near Luton. A good many new forms have come to light. Although specimens of ammonites have been collected at various levels in the series of hard- grounds at different localities there is no significant difference in the lists from place to place apart from the abundance of Baculites undulatus at Reed and Kensworth and its absence else- where. It is therefore reasonable to treat the fauna as a single one, occupying part of the lower part of the Holaster planus Zone. The Chalk Rock occurs in East Anglia and the south Midlands, extending as far west as north Dorset and Wiltshire. Outside this area there may be incipient hardgrounds or beds of nodular chalk that yield the Chalk Rock fauna. Elsewhere specimens of the aragonitic mollusca may occasionally be found in normal chalk of the Holaster planus Zone. In Yorkshire several cases are known (Wright 1935) of patches of chalk containing abundant aragonitic gastropods and bivalves apparently protected from dissolution by large ammonite shells that lay above them. It canonly be assumed therefore that elements of the Chalk Rock fauna occurred more widely and persistently than in the special conditions under which the hardgrounds were formed. Systematic descriptions The following abbreviations are used. BM British Museum (Natural History) coll. collected by, or collection of GSM__ Geological Survey Museum of the Institute of Geological Sciences GSP Geological Survey, Pretoria, South Africa IGS Institute of Geological Sciences MMH _ Mineralogical Museum, Copenhagen SM Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge WW C. W. & E. V. Wright collection Superfamily TURRILITACEAE Meek, 1876 Wiedmann (1962: 179; 1969; 1973) has published successive revisions of the classification of Cretaceous heteromorphs, mainly in contrast with that adopted in the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Wright 19576). A few points, relevant to the present work, are discussed here. Wiedmann rejects the separation at superfamily level of the Turrilitaceae from the Ancylo- cerataceae. However, even if, as is probable, the earliest families assigned to the Turrilitaceae (Anisoceratidae and Hamitidae) were derived from one or more ancyloceratine ancestors, the Turrilitaceae represent a renewed radiation based primarily on bifid sutural lobes, in contrast with the trend to trifid lobes in most stocks of Ancylocerataceae. Wiedmann included in an enlarged family Baculitidae not only the Hamitinae, Baculitinae and Polyptychoceratinae but also Ptychoceratinae; moreover his Baculitinae embraced the wholly Lower Cretaceous group of Bochianitinae. There is in fact no good evidence to contradict Spath’s (1941 : 659) view that the Baculitidae were derived, by way of Lechites, from straighten- ing members of Hamites; they constitute a group starting with and retaining bifid lateral lobes. On the other hand the Bochianitidae start (in late Jurassic) and end with trifid lateral lobes. As to the taxonomic level of the hamitids and baculitids, although the sutures are generally similar the remainder of the morphology is so distinct (with implications for the biology) that by normal ammonite standards family separation is wholly justifiable. There is much to be said for Wiedmann’s reduction of the Nostoceratidae and Diplomocera- tidae to subfamilies of Turrilitidae, and this view is adopted here. The former include a wide range of late Upper Cretaceous loosely and tightly coiled forms, many of which closely resemble the 284 C. W. WRIGHT Middle Albian immediate precursors of Turrilites and its close allies. The subfamily Diplo- moceratinae, on the other hand, comprises a mixed bag of more or less hamitoid presumed offshoots of the Nostoceratinae. Family HAMITIDAE Meek, 1876 Genus METAPTYCHOCERAS Spath, 1926 TYPE SPECIES. Ptychoceras smithi Woods, 1896. The genus comprises small forms, with more or less straight penultimate and final shafts closely pressed together and finely ribbed; the almost smooth, feebly constricted initial shaft is described below for the first time. The type species was the only one referred to the genus by Spath and he gave no generic diagnosis. Thus it is not clear what he envisaged as the difference between this genus and Hemi- ptychoceras from the Upper Albian which he described the year before (Spath 1925: 189). Metaptychoceras is diagnosed (Wright 19576 : L217) as ‘small; much like Hemiptychoceras but has fine ribbing of Stomohamites’, as opposed to Hemiptychoceras which has ‘ribs as in Hamites except on 2nd bend where they tend to be scale-like, as in some Euptychoceras’. Subsequently Wiedmann (1959: 715) quoted M. smithi from his Spanish zone of Fallotites (Ingridella) malladae, the fifth from the base of seven zones into which he divided the Lower Turonian. A species of the genus has also been found in Colombia. Cobban & Scott (1972 : 45) described a new species Hemiptychoceras reesidei from the uppermost Cenomanian (Sciponoceras gracile horizon) Bridge Creek Limestone of Colorado and referred to ‘a smaller but very closely related species’ from the basal Turonian with Watinoceras coloradoense of South Dakota. Reviewing all this material it seems that the distinction between Hemiptychoceras and Meta- ptychoceras is slight but real. The former is larger, more coarsely ribbed and with constrictions on the penultimate shaft and final bend. The latter is very small, finely ribbed and with no con- strictions after the initial shaft. A decision whether these differences justify generic separation must await the discovery of more specimens of these rare forms. Metaptychoceras smithi (Woods) Pl 1; figs, 2 1896 Ptychoceras smithi Woods : pl. 2, figs 1, 2. 1926 Metaptychoceras smithi (Woods) Spath: 81. 1959 Metaptychoceras smithi (Woods); Wiedmann : 715. Ho.otype. SM B4098, from Cuckhamsley Knob. DESCRIPTION. Small, with two slender, more or less straight and parallel, shafts followed by a closely adpressed hook; there was probably a minute initial coiled spire, but this has not yet been found. The recurved part of the hook is circular in section and rests in a rather deep groove in the dorsum of the shaft; there is a minute ‘umbilicus’ at the bend. The first shaft is smooth except for an occasional feeble oblique constriction and accompanying fold. Weak oblique ribs begin soon after the first bend and rapidly become radial, low, rounded and dense. In one specimen (BM C79653; PI. 1, fig. 1) on the later part of the second bend and the beginning of the second shaft they are rursiradiate, sharp and distant; thereafter they are a little coarser, more distant and radial. In another specimen (BM C79658) the ribs have almost disappeared on the bend and only become strong on the latter part of the final shaft. Woods differentiates the species from Hemi- ptychoceras gaultinum (Pictet) by the absence of any coarsening of the ribs on the bend, but the ribbing in the later stages in M. smithi seems to be variable and detailed differences are probably unimportant. The suture consists of rather wide and splayed, moderately subdivided and very regularly bifid elements; the external lobe is a little less deep than the first lateral lobe. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 285 OCCURRENCE. The species seems to be rare, but being small may sometimes pass unnoticed. Besides the holotype from Cuckhamsley (SM B4098) there is a specimen (SM B21326) from Lannock Farm, east of Hitchin. Hill End Farm Pit, Hitch Wood yielded to R. E. H. Reid two specimens more complete than the holotype and to R. G. Bromley the juvenile specimen here figured. A specimen was recorded from Burham, Kent by Dibley (1912 : 373). Family BACULITIDAE Meek, 1876 Genus SCIPONOCERAS Hyatt, 1894 Type species. Hamites baculoides Mantell, 1822. Sciponoceras appears first in the dispar—perinflatum Subzone of the uppermost Albian in England and France. These early forms are not yet well known, since only rather short fragments of internal casts have been found. They seem to be derived directly from a species of Lechites, such as L. communis Spath, by the almost complete loss of ribs and the strengthening of constrictions. Small fragments of similar forms are found in the early Cenomanian Glauconitic Marl of the Isle of Wight. They may be distinct from the type species, S. baculoides (Mantell), but well-charac- terized specimens have yet to be found. The Chalk Marl of Sussex and the Isle of Wight has yielded fairly well preserved specimens similar to the type specimens of S. baculoides (Kennedy 1971 : pl. 2, figs 1-5), characterized by . an oval whorl section, strong and fairly close constrictions with only the faintest of intermediate ribs, strong ventral ribbing just before the aperture and a dorsally-directed aperture with ventral sinus and lateral lappets. By the middle of the Cenomanian in England (the Dorset and Somerset basement beds, Kennedy’s Turrilites acutus assemblage) there is a species differing from S. baculoides mainly in its aperture, which is oblique instead of slightly curved, has only feeble lateral lappets and has a ventral rostrum instead of sinus. In the uppermost Cenomanian with Metoicoceras in Europe and the United States occurs S. gracile (Shumard), with ribs that become very strong in adults. In the earliest Turonian there is, in England at least, a form which fore- shadows the typical S. bohemicum described below. S. bohemicum (Fritsch) retains marked constrictions and an aperture not very different from that of the Cenomanian type species; despite certain other features it can be fairly regarded as a Sciponoceras. It is accompanied, however, by an early form of true Baculites, also described below, and is probably the last Sciponoceras. Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) Pl. 1, figs 3-5; Pl. 7, figs 10, 12 1843 Baculites anceps Geinitz : 9. 1850 Baculites baculoides Geinitz : 122. 1872 Baculites faujassi Lamarck var. bohemica Fritsch : 49; pl. 13, figs 23-25, 29, 30. 1874 Baculites baculoides Geinitz; Geinitz : 195; pl. 35, figs 17-21. 1875 Baculites bohemicus Fritsch; Barrois : 403. 1876 Baculites cf. bohemicus Fritsch; Schliiter : 140; pl. 39, figs 1-5. 1893 Baculites Faujassi var. bohemica Fritsch & Schlonbach; Fritsch : 80, fig. 63. 1895 Baculites Faujassi var. bohemica Fritsch; Jahn : 133; pl. 8, fig. 8. 1896 Baculites bohemicus Fritsch & Schlénbach; Woods: 76; pl. 2, figs 9, 10. 1908 Baculites (Lechites) Bohemicus Fritsch & Schlonbach; Nowak : 348-350. 1927 Cyrtochilus bohemicus (Fritsch & Schlénbach) Billinghurst : 513. 1951 Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) Wright & Wright : 16. LectotyPeE. The original of Fritsch’s 1872: pl. 13, fig. 25a, b, c, here designated. DESCRIPTION. The shell increases very slowly in height and width; it is elliptical in section with the sides tending to become flattened with age. 286 C. W. WRIGHT Dorsoventral Transverse diameter diameter BM C79497 5-5 mm 4 mm BM C79496 12:5 mm 9-5 mm The body chamber becomes somewhat triangular in section towards the aperture. During the camerate stage there are on internal casts rather frequent broad shallow constrictions at somewhat irregular intervals. In the early stages they are almost as strong on the dorsum as on the sides and venter, but the dorsal part weakens with age and in many individuals they become almost imper- ceptible on the inner third of the side. The constrictions run backwards at an angle of about 120° to the long axis of the shell, then curve forward a third of the way up the side to run obliquely at about 40° to the long axis as far as the venter, which they cross in a broad curve with a steep rear and a shallow forward slope. Between the constrictions there are in the early stages two or three low rounded ribs, distinct on the outer third and on the venter. Later they become flattened and indistinctly branched. On the body chamber the ribs are distinct also on the inner part of the sides where they branch from crescentic bullae which are low but perceptible, to strong. At this stage, in the absence of constrictions, the ornament is somewhat like that of the camerate part of con- temporary Baculites undulatus. At the aperture the dorsum and in fact the whole shell curves inwards, the aperture being directed about 45° dorsally. There are no lappets or collars such as characterize the Cenomanian species of Sciponoceras, and the aperture is much like that of S. gracile (Shumard). The suture has rather irregularly bifid elements. The first lateral (external) saddle is much higher than the next one and the umbilical lobe and internal saddle are markedly shorter than the other elements. REMARKS. Although S. bohemicum has been frequently quoted in the literature and has been figured several times there is no satisfactory description of the species. The English Chalk material has yielded many fragments of internal moulds in hard phosphatized chalk which allow an accurate assessment of the ornament to be made. There is good agreement with Fritsch’s clear figures and there can be no doubt of the identity of the English with the Czechoslovakian material. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. SS. bohemicum is in many respects close to the uppermost Cenomanian S. gracile (Shumard) from which it is probably derived. Typical S. gracile differ in having a some- what less compressed whorl section, in their stronger, more evenly rounded ribs becoming very strong on the body chamber, and in their constrictions that are noticeably less distinct on the sides and dorsum and cross the venter more or less transversely. In S. bohemicum, by contrast, the ribs are flat and almost scale-like even on the body chamber; the constrictions are frequently obvious even on the dorsum and cross the venter in an even curve. Some American populations of S. gracile, though not those of the English south-west, show variation in the strength of ribs and constrictions and some individuals in their early stages may be difficult to distinguish from S. bohemicum. Specimens from the English Melbourne Rock (e.g. WW 16137—40 from Buckland Limeworks, Surrey, and SM B91099 and B91100 from Folkestone, Kent) that are only slightly later than the uppermost Cenomanian S. gracile from Devon have ribbing closely resembling that of S. bohemi- cum and constrictions strong on the inner part of the sides and the dorsum. The only feature linking them with S. gracile is the transverse course of the constrictions on the venter. They should probably be treated as a subspecies of S. bohemicum. The Lower and Middle Cenomanian S. baculoides (Mantell) has ribs shallow behind and steep in front. They thus resemble the scale-like ribs of S. bohemicum but are much stronger, prorsi- radiate as they rise near the dorsum and distinctly recurved towards the venter. From contemporary forms assignable to Baculites, S. bohemicum is readily distinguished by its frequent and well-marked constrictions, although body-chamber fragments may be difficult to identify. OccurRENCE. SS. bohemicum is widespread and fairly common in both Chalk Rock and nodular facies of the Holaster planus Zone of south-eastern England, East Anglia and the midlands. It occurs in northern and central Europe at presumably the same horizon. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 287 Genus BACULITES Lamarck, 1799 Type species. B. vertebralis Lamarck, 1801, subsequently designated by Meek (1876). Baculites appears to have been derived from an Upper Turonian Sciponoceras by loss of con- strictions and further simplification of the aperture. I have seen no undoubted Baculites earlier than B. undulatus described below. Poorly-preserved and crushed Sciponoceras, particularly fragments of body chambers, often look deceptively like Baculites. Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny Pl. 1, figs 6-8; Pl. 7, fig. 11 1850 Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny : 19 & 21, no. 21. 21872 Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny ?; Fritsch: 49. 1895 Baculites n. sp. Jahn : 136; pl. 8, fig. 8a—c. 1913 Baculites undulatus dOrbigny; Roman & Mazeran: 11; pl. 4, figs 6-8. 1963 Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny; Matsumoto & Obata: 28; pl. 8, fig. 4; pl. 9, figs 1-5; pl. 11, figs 2, 3; text-figs 62-71. DESCRIPTION. Whorl section elliptical, narrowing ventrally with increasing age. The low rounded ribs are rursiradiate dorsally at about 150° but bend forward and become prorsiradiate at about 45° on the ventral three-quarters of the shell, forming a more or less crescentic bulla at the bend. At first the ribs are mainly single but from a (major) diameter of about 10 mm they begin to branch irregularly at or above the bulla. On the body chamber the dorsal part of most ribs becomes weaker, so there can be seen only rounded and well-spaced bullae from which spring sheaves of six or more feeble ribs. The aperture is described from Japanese specimens by Mat- sumoto & Obata (1963 : 29). The largest fragment seen (Doyle coll. 662) has diameters of 26 and 20-5 mm. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. B. undulatus is readily distinguished at the camerate stage from the contemporary Sciponoceras bohemicum by the absence of constrictions and by the finer and weaker but more numerous ribs. On the body chamber the well-spaced bullae and sheaves of fine secondary ribs are sufficiently characteristic. Although d’Orbigny’s types of B. undulatus, as figured by Roman & Mazeran (1913), are only small fragments they clearly belong to the same species as the better-preserved English specimens. Presumably the Bohemian specimens described but not figured by Fritsch belong to the same form. The next earliest true Baculites that have been described are Coniacian species from the Pacific (Japan and California), Africa and Europe. Baculites brevicosta Schliiter (Coniacian or Lower Santonian of northern Europe), the African and Pacific C. boulei Collignon and B. capense Woods, and the American B. asper all have far more distinct and prominent crescentic bullae than those of B. undulatus. There is, however, an intermediate group comprising B. yokoyamai Tokunaga & Shimizu, B. besairiei Collignon and B. schenki Matsumoto. Describing the Californian forms Matsumoto (1959) considered that B. yokoyamai, which occurs frequently in Japan in the Coniacian immediately above Sciponoceras aff. bohemicum, probably includes B. besairei Collignon from Madagascar. These forms appear to have feebler ornament than the present species but similar whorl section and suture. The closely allied B. schenki from California is more triangular in section and typically has more strongly tuberculate dorsolateral crescents on the ribs. B. undulatus could also well have been the source of the Coniacian Euhomaloceras incurvatum (Dujardin), characterized by distant, large, round dorsolateral tubercles as well as by the curved body chamber. OccurRRENCE. In England B. undulatus is known only from a few localities, Reed in Hertfordshire and Kensworth. 288 C. W. WRIGHT Family ANISOCERATIDAE Meek, 1876 Genus ANISOCERAS Pictet, 1854 TYPE SPECIES. Anisoceras saussureanum Pictet. Anisoceras reidi sp. nov. Tevez, ibs Tel; il aie; 15) Types. The holotype is BM C79487 (WW, ex Reid coll.) from Hitch Wood; a paratype is GSM 117001 (trans. from St Albans City Museum, ex Morison coll.) from Luton Railway Cutting. NAME. For Mr R. E. H. Reid. DESCRIPTION. The section is compressed and the venter only slightly flattened ; the height increases rather rapidly. The ribs are fairly dense, low and rounded, irregularly with and without ventro- lateral spines, of which low flat bases alone appear on the internal mould. The ribs with tubercles are doubled across the venter. The ribs are slightly bowed forward at midflank and are thus weakly biconcave. First and second lateral saddles of the suture and lateral and umbilical lobes are basically bifid but the lobes are irregularly asymmetric (Fig. 1); indeed the lateral lobe in the holotype is obviously bifid on the left side but almost trifid on the right. The third lateral saddle is distinctly narrower than the others. REMARKS. R. E. H. Reid collected a single specimen of what appears to be a true Anisoceras, although superficially it resembles some contemporary Allocrioceras. Hitherto Anisoceras has been only doubtfully represented above the Cenomanian and it is already rare in the uppermost part of that stage. Schliiter (1872) described and figured from the uppermost Turonian two species that belong to this family, Ancyloceras paderbornense (1872 : 97; pl. 30, figs. 1, 2) and A. cuvieri (1872 : 97; pl. 30, figs 3, 4). The former, though not typical of Anisoceras, may be referred pro- visionally to that genus; it differs from A. reidi by its lateral tubercles and less regular and more distant ventrolateral tubercles. A. cuvieri (Schliiter) is perhaps best referred to Allocrioceras (see below). Although like Anisoceras reidi it has no lateral tubercles, it has ventrolateral ones only on every fifth or sixth rib, which is more prominent than the rest; moreover the ribs are slightly sinuous and more prorsiradiate than in the present species. Most Allocrioceras are distinguish- able by their sharper ribs and tubercles and simpler sutures. However, the two new species of Allocrioceras described below have in their later stages rounded ribs and septate tubercles that leave flat spine bases on the internal moulds as in Anisoceras; their sutures are also complex in Plate 1 x 1 (Figs 1-2, 4-5 x 2) Metaptychoceras smithi (Woods) (p. 284). Hitch Wood. Fig. 1. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79653, x2. Fig. 2. R. G. Bromley coll. C.146, x2. Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) (p. 285). Hitch Wood. Fig. 3a, b. J.C. Doyle coll. Figs 4a, b, 5. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79496, C79507, both x 2. See also Pl. 7, figs 10, 12. Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny (p. 287). Reed. Figs 6, 7, 8. J. C. Doyle coll. See also Pl. 7, fig. 11. Allocrioceras angustum (J. de C. Sowerby) (p. 290). Hitch Wood. Figs 9, 10. R. E. H. Reid coll. BM C79489, C79488. Fig. 1la, b. Specimen showing aperture. J. C. Doyle coll. 382. Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. nov. (p. 291). Hitch Wood. Figs 12, 14a, b. Paratypes, J. C. Doyle coll. 477, 352. Fig. 13a, b. Holotype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79490. See also PI. 2, fig. 1. Anisoceras reidi sp. noy. (above). Hitch Wood. Fig. 15a, b. Holotype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79487. See Fig. 1, p. 290, for suture. 289 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 290 C. W. WRIGHT old age. The main distinguishing features of A. reidi then are the doubling of the tuberculate ribs as they cross the venter and the length and narrowness of the second and third lateral saddles in the suture. Of earlier species of Anisoceras the Upper Albian and Lower Cenomanian A. campichei Spath is perhaps closest to A. reidi, but it has sharper and more distant ribs which meet regularly in pairs at the ventrolateral tubercles. OCCURRENCE. Only two undoubted specimens are known, from Hitch Wood and the Luton railway cutting. Fig. 1 Suture of Anisoceras reidi sp. nov., x 2. Genus ALLOCRIOCERAS Spath, 1926 TYPE SPECIES. Allocrioceras woodsi Spath, 1926, = Hamites angustus J. de C. Sowerby, 1850. Spath attributed this genus to his family Phlycticrioceratidae. The nominate genus of that family is with little doubt derived from A//ocrioceras but differs from it and from most other hamitoid genera in having a siphonal row of tubercles. Prophlycticrioceras Clark from the Upper Albian of Texas seems to be an analogue rather than a direct ancestor. A little-known Coniacian genus Boehmoceras Riedel, 1931, doubtfully attributed to the same family, has an entire rounded keel and clearly does not belong here. Although Allocrioceras constitutes a fairly distinct group of species it does not have any characters of such importance as to justify its separation from the Anisoceratidae. Phlycticrioceratidae, if necessary as a taxon at all, are best regarded as a sub- family of Anisoceratidae and as including only the nominate genus. Allocrioceras includes some species that are apparently regularly coiled in one plane and others that are rather irregular and generally rather helicoid, with the shell so twisted that the dorso- ventral axis is at an angle greater than 90° to the axis of the spire. The ribs are normally single, regular or variable in strength, and in most species the majority carry ventrolateral tubercles. Constrictions may be present. The saddles of the suture are more or less regularly bifid. The lateral and umbilical lobes are asymmetric and not so obviously bifid as in some allied genera. Allocrioceras is first known from the top of the Cenomanian in Britain and the U.S.A. (4. annulatum (Shumard). It may have been derived from Jdiohamites of the group of I. alternatus (Mantell). Allocrioceras angustum (J. de C. Sowerby) Pl. 1, figs 9-11 1850 Hamites angustus J. de C. Sowerby, in Dixon : 346; pl. 29, fig. 12. 1850 Hamites geinitzii d’Orbigny : 215. 1876 Crioceras ellipticum Mantell sp.; Schliiter : 164; pl. 43, figs 1, 2 (non 1872 : 100; pl. 30, figs 11, 12). 1896 Crioceras ellipticum (Mantell); Woods : 84; pl. 3, figs 8-10. 1927 Allocrioceras aff. ellipticum (non Mantell) Woods sp.; Billinghurst : 517; pl. 16, fig. 4a—c. 1939 Allocrioceras woodsi Spath : 598. 1951 Allocrioceras woodsi Spath; Wright & Wright : 15. DESCRIPTION. Coiled more or less regularly in a loose open spire, with the dorsoventral axis of the shell oblique to the axis of the spire. The body chamber levels out and uncoils, so that the last AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 291 part may be almost straight. The section is oval, with a flat venter emphasized by the outwardly- directed ventrolateral spines present on all the ribs or on alternate ones. The ribs are alternately strong and weak and the tubercles on the weak ones, if present, are feebler than those on the strong ribs; the difference is sometimes marked (e.g. BM C33429). The ribs are fairly sharp and separated by distinctly wider interspaces; they may be radial, prorsiradiate or rursiradiate, varying with the coiling. The aperture has a flat striated margin, parallel with the ribs. The suture has moderately indented, squarish saddles, more or less symmetrically divided by lobules, and bifid lobes, the lateral and umbilical slightly asymmetrical. The first lateral saddle is the widest and the second lateral the narrowest of the three that are present. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. A. angustum closely resembles its predecessor and presumed an- cestor A. annulatum (Shumard). It differs in its less symmetrical and more irregular coiling, by its slightly irregular ribs, alternately strong and weak, by the feebleness or absence of tubercles on the weaker ribs and by the slightly to moderately compressed whorl section. No doubt in a series of specimens collected throughout the Turonian the variation in these characters would be found to be continuous, but A. annulatum is known in this country only from the uppermost Ceno- manian with Metoicoceras and Neocardioceras and in the United States from that and slightly earlier horizons, whereas A. angustum occurs much later. Woods (1896) recognized that Sowerby’s Hamites angustus was the common Chalk Rock species but identified both, incorrectly, with Mantell’s Idiohamites ellipticus, a Lower Ceno- manian species with much more compressed section and more rounded ribbing. /diohamites alternatus (Mantell), also Lower Cenomanian, is more distantly and coarsely ribbed and tuber- culate. C. F. Romer (1870 : 322; pl. 37, fig. 10) figures as Hamites ellipticus a fragment with distant blunt ribs and apparently no tubercles; although he said that Dixon’s H. angustus was ‘probably synonymous’, this seems unlikely. OccurRRENCE. This is one of the commonest Chalk Rock species and is also known from the Holaster planus chalk in its nodular and normal facies, occurring even in Yorkshire. Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. nov. Pl. 1, figs 12-14; Pl. 2, fig. 1 1876 Crioceras ellipticum (Mantell); Schliiter : pl. 30, figs 11, 12 (non 1876: pl. 43, figs 1, 2). Types. The holotype is BM C79490 (WW coll.), the paratypes BM C79508 (WW coll.) and Doyle coll. 352 and 477, all from Hitch Wood. NAME. ‘Constricted.’ DESCRIPTION. Coiled in a moderately open, slightly helical spiral, perhaps irregular in the early stages. Section compressed oval. Constrictions are present but are sparse and rather feeble on the outer whorls. The ribs are rather fine and sinuous, almost biconcave, with paired ventral tubercles, rather close together on each rib; occasionally two ribs join at the ventrolateral tubercle. The ribs and tubercles are sharp on the early whorls but become blunter later, the tubercles then being slightly elongated spirally, instead of transversely as on the early part, and in some cases septi- spinate. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The compression, constrictions, sinuous ribs and the closeness of the ventral tubercles on the early whorls readily distinguish this species from A. angustum or A. annulatum. The English specimens compare well with Schliiter’s Crioceras ellipticum (1876: pl. 30, figs 11, 12) from the Turonian of Lengerich, in section, coiling, rib curve and tuberculation; despite the apparent absence of constrictions in the German specimen it is presumably the same species. OccurRENCE. In England it is known only from Hitch Wood and Kensworth, where it is rare. It occurs also in Germany. 292 C. W. WRIGHT Allocrioceras billinghursti Klinger Pl. 2, figs 2, 3a, b 1874 Helicoceras ellipticum (Mantell); Geinitz : 194; pl. 35, figs 14-16. 1927 Allocrioceras sp. ind. Billinghurst : 617; pl. 16, fig. 7a, b. 1976 Allocrioceras billinghursti (Wright MS) Klinger : 32; pl. 9, fig. 2a, b; text-fig. 7b. Types. Klinger merely designated as holotype ‘Geinitz pl. 35, fig. 16’. The originals of Geinitz’ figs 14 and 15 and of Billinghurst’s pl. 16, fig. 7a, b (BM C32298), which were cited in Klinger’s synonymy, as well as the latter’s Zululand specimens GSP Z1598 and Z2069, are paratypes. MATERIAL. The following English specimens were cited in drafts of the present paper from which Klinger presumably took the specific name: BM C78510, C79650-2 (WW ex Reid coll.), BM C79505-6 (WW ex Bromley coll.), all from Hitch Wood; A. Wainwright coll. J62 from Kens- worth and R. Bromley coll. C158 from Reed. DESCRIPTION. Coiled in an open, apparently more or less regular helical spire; markedly torticone, with the long diameter of the whorl section oblique to the axis of the spire. The ribs are almost vertical if fragments are placed so that the axis of the spire would be vertical. They are strong and well spaced, fairly sharp at first but becoming more rounded later. The main ribs bear rather strong spines, which on later parts of the shell become septate so that only flat spine bases are seen on internal moulds. Between the main ribs there are one or two that are weaker on the venter; in the early stages such ribs carry spines but later they are untuberculate. The suture is florid at later growth stages but still has the wide, more or less parallel-sided and equal saddles typical of Allocrioceras. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The stronger ribs in the early stages and the more helical and strongly torticone coiling serve to distinguish this species from contemporary members of the genus. Some specimens of the uppermost Cenomanian and basal Turonian A. annulatum (Shu- mard) approach the present species in these respects but are not so torticone and have much weaker ventrolateral spines. A few specimens of A. billinghursti (e.g. BM C33430) have rather finer, closer and more regular ribs than the typical form and thus are closer to A. angustum. Large fragments like BM C79510 and Geinitz’ specimens resemble many nostoceratids in the swung ribs and coiling, but the suture remains typical of Allocrioceras and has no resemblance to the nostoceratid type with deeply dissected, overhanging and narrow-based first lateral saddle. OccurRRENCE. In England in the Chalk Rock of Hitch Wood, Kensworth and Reed; in the Turonian of Saxony and in the Lower Coniacian of Zululand. Allocrioceras (?) cf. cuvieri (Schliter) ef. 1872 Ancyloceras cuvieri Schliter : 97; pl. 30, figs 3, 4. DESCRIPTION. A single specimen in J. C. Doyle’s collection, comprising two fragments of com- pressed, more or less criocone early whorls with maximum whorl height of 11 mm and breadth of 8-5 mm, seems to compare best with Schliiter’s species, founded on a specimen from the ‘Cuvieri-Planer’ of Salzgitter. The English specimen has regular prorsiradiate rounded ribs, six in a distance corresponding to the larger diameter, with slight but distinct bullate ventrolateral tubercles; the ribs at first are interrupted on the venter but later cross it transversely, while the tubercles weaken. An enlarged rounded rib is visible at the anterior end of the larger fragment. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The German holotype is at its smaller end nearly twice the diameter of the English specimen and exact comparison is therefore impossible. It has prominent ventro- lateral tubercles on the periodic enlarged ribs but it is not clear whether there were also tubercles on the minor ribs. The English specimen somewhat resembles Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. nov. (p. 291) in peripheral view but the prorsiradiate ribs, rounded from an early stage of growth, readily distinguish it. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 293 The periodic enlarged ribs are unlike anything seen in other species of Allocrioceras but the present form is probably best placed in this genus. OCCURRENCE. Chalk Rock of Kensworth. Genus NEOCRIOCERAS Spath, 1921 This genus was based on an unidentified form allied to, but according to Shimizu (1933 : 15) distinct from, Crioceras spinigerum Jimbo, 1894, but that species was subsequently designated as type by Diener (1925 : 192). This is an apparently criocone form, perhaps with initial whorls not in one plane, with fine close ribs on some of which there are midlateral and on others ventro- lateral tubercles, the latter alternating on the venter. Other species with more or less straight shafts, that had from time to time been referred to Neocrioceras, were rightly separated from the typical species as a distinct subgenus Schlueterella Wiedmann (1962: 205) with type species Ancyloceras pseudoarmatum Schliter, 1872; Wiedmann doubted indeed whether the two sub- genera were of the same phylogenetic origin. Subsequently Collignon (1969 : 47) described a new genus Christophoceras, with a type species based on a magnificent body chamber with straight shaft and final hook, that is undoubtedly a synonym of N. (Schlueterella). The form described below is very similar to Collignon’s. Subgenus SCHLUETERELLA Wiedmann, 1962 Neocrioceras (Schlueterella) multinodosum (Schliiter) Pl. 2, figs 4, 5 1872 Hamites multinodosus Schliter : 106; pl. 32, figs 1, 2. DESCRIPTION. The English material comprises a small but uncrushed specimen (GSM 108903), apparently at the stage where the shell has just straightened after a bend, and a very small frag- ment of a slightly larger specimen (Doyle coll. 469). The section is oval. There are periodic rectiradiate ribs which bear prominent spines high up on the sides, joined by looped riblets to prominent paired ventral spines, similarly joined across the venter by looped riblets. Between these major ribs there are slightly less strong ones, seven in number in this small fragment, with small but distinct ventrolateral and ventral spines similar in position to those on the major ribs. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The English specimen figured in Pl. 2, fig. 5 is at about the same growth stage as the holotype of Neocrioceras (S). sanushibense Wright & Matsumoto (1954: 121; pl. 7, fig. Sa, b) from the Upper Santonian of Japan, but differs in having a more compressed section and seven as opposed to three or four intermediate minor ribs, which moreover do not tend to join at the ventrolateral tubercles. All the characters suggest the association of the English specimens with Schliiter’s crushed and fragmentary holotype of H. multinodosus; at a con- siderably later growth stage than the English material this has five minor ribs between the major ones; taking into account the Campanian N. (S.) pseudoarmatum (Schliter) which has only one or two intermediate ribs (Schliiter 1872 : 99; pl. 31, figs 1-3; 1876: pl. 43, figs 5-9) one would expect the number to decrease from early to later stages in phylogeny. The periodic enlarged ribs with looped riblets between the tubercles on shoulder and venter distinguish Neocrioceras from most species of the otherwise rather similar Pseudoxybeloceras. However, Ancyloceras lineatum Gabb and Oxybeloceras petrolense Anderson, referred by Mat- sumoto (1959: 162) to Pseudoxybeloceras, have occasional major ribs of Neocrioceras type. Indeed the present form is particularly interesting in that its abundant straight minor ribs strongly recall the ribs of Pseudoxybeloceras (cf. Wright & Matsumoto 1954: text-figs 9-12). The two genera are now both known to range from Upper Turonian to Campanian and one is probably derived from the other. If the decrease in the number of minor ribs between each pair of major ones from seven in the Turonian N. multinodosum to three or four in the Santonian N. sanushibense and one or two in the Campanian N. pseudoarmatum is taken to indicate that the enlarged major 294 C. W. WRIGHT ribs were a new feature when the genus first arose, then Neocrioceras was derived from Pseud- oxybeloceras rather than the reverse. OCCURRENCE. Single fragments each from Reed, Hitch Wood and north Germany. Family TURRILITIDAE Meek, 1876 Subfamily NOSTOCERATINAE Hyatt, 1894 Howarth (1965 : 371-374) has reviewed the classification of this family and in particular Wiedmann’s (1962) drastic reduction of the three most widely used genera to the status of synonyms of Cirroceras Conrad, 1868. I agree with Howarth that Cirroceras, which I accepted as senior synonym of Didymoceras Hyatt, 1894 (Wright 19575), should be treated as a nomen dubium, and I also accept his conclusion that Bostrychoceras and Didymoceras are best regarded as synonymous. Genus DIDYMOCERAS Hyatt, 1894 TyPE SPECIES. D. nebraskense Hyatt. Didymoceras (including Bostrychoceras Hyatt, see Howarth 1965) was long regarded as an Upper Senonian genus; earlier species with similar coiling and ribbing were referred, by Billing- hurst (1927 : 513) for example, to Hyphantoceras, whose type species has very irregular coiling and different ornament. In fact there is a series of species beginning with D. thomasi (Pervinquiére) from the Upper Cenomanian of Algeria and continuing to the Campanian forms with whorls regularly in contact until the body chamber, which become increasingly U-shaped, and have regular dense ribbing. The main differences between species lie in the apical angle, the numbers, angle and curve of the ribs and the numbers and form of constrictions. These early Didymoceras differ little from Middle Albian Proturrilitoides, from survivors of which they were presumably derived, except in the pendent, incipiently U-shaped body chamber. By the Campanian, however, Plate 2 x2 Il Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. nov. (p. 291). Hitch Wood. Fig. 1. Closely-ribbed specimen with occasional looped ribs. Paratype, J. C. Doyle coll. 358. See also Pl. 1, figs 12-14. Allocrioceras billinghursti Klinger (p. 292). Hitch Wood. Fig. 2. The species is always twisted so that both right and left ventrolateral tubercles are visible in this view. Coll. WW. BM C79510. Fig. 3. Later whorls with blunt ribs, coll. R. G. Bromley. BM C79505. Neocrioceras (Schlueterella) multinodosum (Schliiter) (p. 293). Fig. 4. Hitch Wood. Doubtful fragment. J. C. Doyle coll. 469. Fig. 5a, b. Reed. Body-chamber fragment, coll. C. J. Wood. GSM 108903. Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny) (p. 297). Hitch Wood. Fig. 6. End of camerate part and regular pendent body chamber, J. C. Doyle coll. 1288. Fig. 7. Irregular body chamber with expanded aperture, coll. WW. BM C79478. See also PI. 7, figs 4, 6. Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) (p. 296). Figs 8, 9a, b. Hitch Wood. Fig. 8 shows reversal of direction of ribs between the first and second preserved whorls. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79491, C79492. Fig. 10. Hitch Wood. Body chamber of sinistral individual. Coll. WW. BM C79476. Fig. 11. Hitch Wood. Body chamber of dextral individual showing penultimate and ultimate constrictions. J. C. Doyle coll. 647. Fig. 12. Cuckhamsley Knob. Specimen with unusually fine ribs. SM B4253. See also Pl. 7, fig. 5. Photograph: Fig. 2 by BM. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 295 296 C. W. WRIGHT additional forms appear in which the last few whorls before the body chamber become uncoiled and may be more or less regularly bituberculate. These include the type species of the genus; among such species probably lies the origin of Nostoceras with regular bituberculate ribbing (Howarth 1965 : 372-374). Eubostrychoceras Matsumoto (1967 : 332), created for the pre-Campanian species, I would now regard as unnecessary, but it might reasonably be employed as a subgenus. Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) Pi) 2, figs) 812 Pile 7otige 5 1840 Turrilites undulatus Mantell; Geinitz : 42; pl. 13, fig. 1 only. 1841 Turrilites polyplocus F. A. Romer: pl. 14, fig. 2 only. 1843 Turrilites polyplocus Romer; Geinitz: 67; pl. 13, fig. 1. 1846 Turrilites polyplocus Romer; Geinitz: pl. 12, fig. 3. 1850 Turrilites Geinitzii d’Orbigny : 216. 1870 Turrilites polyplocus F. A. Romer; C. F. Romer : 321; pl. 36, fig. 1. 1872 Turrilites Geinitzii d’ Orbigny; Schliiter : 113; pl. 35, fig. 10. 1874 Turrilites polyplocus F. A. Rémer; Geinitz : 195; pl. 36, figs 1-3. 1875 Turrilites saxonicus Schliter : 30. 1876 Turrilites saxonicus Schliiter; Schliiter : 135. 1895 Turrilites saxonicus Schliiter; Kossmat : 143. 1896 Heteroceras sp. Woods : 75; pl. 2, figs 6-8. 1922 Heteroceras woodsi Kitchin : 49. 1927 Hyphantoceras woodsi (Kitchin) Billinghurst : 517; pl. 16, figs 5, 6. 1962 Cirroceras (Cirroceras) indicum saxonicum (Schliiter) Wiedmann : 203. DESCRIPTION. Coiled in a sinistral or dextral spire with a wide umbilicus and with the whorls in contact until the slightly pendent U-shaped body chamber. The whorl section in the early stages is round, subquadrate or slightly oval but becomes increasingly oval with age. There are two or three oblique constrictions to a whorl; on the internal mould they are rather deep with rounded edges but on the shell they have sharp collars. On the later whorls they are strongly undercut and towards the end the front collar is directed backwards over the constriction. The shell increases suddenly in cross section after each constriction. Between constrictions there are fine, regular, sharp or rounded, single or branching ribs, separated by slightly wider interspaces. The density of ribbing varies between individuals but there are normally about 90 ribs to a whorl, many branched low on the side. The ribs and constrictions are always oblique and on most of the shell are directed forwards from the upper margin, but in some individuals they are directed backwards for a few whorls and then change direction (PI. 2, fig. 8). On the more oval later whorls the ribs are very sinuous. The pendent body chamber turns up at the end and has a final con- striction with sharp collars. The siphuncle is in the middle of the outer side of the whorl. The suture has rather florid bifid elements; the first lateral lobe is the widest and undercuts the first lateral (external) saddle, reaching almost to the siphuncle on one side and the umbilical lobe on the other. A small fragment of the early stages (BM C79470) from the Holaster planus Zone of the Guildford bypass indicates a shell with a right-angled bend in one plane followed by three more or less straight shafts, up to 9 mm long, joined by right-angled bends in another plane. This fragment links with the specimen figured in PI .7, fig. 5 and suggests that the species had irregular and possibly heterostrophic early whorls. To the best of my knowledge no normally-coiled initial whorls of the species have been found. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The much later (Campanian) D. polyplocum has more inflated whorls than D. saxonicum, no constrictions, straighter ribs, a freer pendent body chamber and no sudden change in whorl section at the end of the spire. The Coniacian D. indicum (Stoliczka) appears to have distinctly less oblique and stronger ribs and a more acute apical angle than D. saxonicum, with a consequential narrower umbilicus. Kossmat (1895 : 143) recognized the close similarity of the two forms and it may be that D. saxonicum should be treated as a subspecies of indicum. Indeed Wiedmann (1962 : 202) treated these two, with elongatum of Whiteaves, as subspecies of a AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 297 variable long-ranging species. I am not yet satisfied that this is justified and prefer to maintain the three as distinct species for the present. NOMENCLATURE. Geinitz’ (1839) specimen of ‘Turrilites undulatus’ was referred by ROmer (1841) to his species polyplocus, but since Geinitz described it from areas, such as Strehlen, noted for their Turonian faunas it presumably belongs to the present species. D’Orbigny’s (1850 : 216) species geinitzii was based only on one of Geinitz’ specimens (1840: pl. 13, fig. 3); later Geinitz (1874 : 195) stated that this specimen was too badly preserved for specific determination, an opinion which the illustration supports. Schliiter (1872: pl. 35, fig. 10) figured a specimen as T. geinitzii d’Orbigny, but Geinitz in 1874 said that this was not the same species as d’Orbigny’s T. geinitzii, based on Geinitz’ own badly-preserved example. In the light of his statement the name cannot be regarded as validated by Schliiter’s description of good and identifiable material, as might otherwise have been the case. T. geinitzii must therefore be treated as a nomen dubium, being based only on unidentifiable material. Schliiter recognized this and (1875 : 30) named the species Turrilites saxonicus, represented in his figure of 1872 (pl. 35, fig. 10). He used the same name in a later part of his monograph (Schliiter 1876: 135), where he gave a synonymy that largely agrees with that given above, but under ‘1841 Turrilites polyplocus Ad. Romer’ he cited ‘pl. 14, fig. 1 (non! fig. 2).’ This is the reverse of what would accord with the rest of his synonymy and is presumably a mistake. OccuRRENCE. Abundant in Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire but rare elsewhere in England. It occurs also in north and south Germany and in Czechoslovakia. Genus HYPHANTOCERAS Hyatt, 1900 TYPE SPECIES. Hamites reussianus d’Orbigny, 1850. Shorn of the species now referred to Didymoceras, Hyphantoceras is a well-circumscribed genus, characterized by loose and frequently irregular coiling in three dimensions, distant main ribs, thin and high with two to four flare-like tubercles, with or without fine feeble intermediate ribs. The suture is florid and similar to that of Didymoceras. H. reussianum is the earliest known species. It could well have been derived from some early species of Didymoceras by loosening of the coiling, loss of the constrictions and development of flared main ribs perhaps from the collars of Didymoceras. Later species differing in coiling and details of the ribbing range into the Santonian. Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny) Pl. 2, figs 6, 7; Pl. 7, figs 4, 6 1840 Hamites plicatilis Mantell; Geinitz : 41; pl. 12, fig. 4; pl. 14, fig. 2. 1841 Hamites plicatilis Sowerby; F. A. Romer : 94; pl. 14, fig. 7. 1843 Hamites plicatilis Sowerby; Geinitz : 8; pl. 5, fig. 2. 1843 Turrilites polyplocus var. Geinitz : 8; pl. 5, fig. 4. 1845 Hamites plicatilis Sowerby; Reuss : 23; pl. 7, figs 5, 6. 21845 Turrilites Astierianus d’Orbigny; Reuss: 24; pl. 7, fig. 7. 1846 Hamites armatus dOrbigny; Geinitz : 304; pl. 12, fig. 3. 1850 Hamites reussianus d’Orbigny : 216. 1861 Anisoceras Reussianus (d’Orbigny) Pictet & Campiche : 76. 1870 AHelicoceras annulifer C. F. Romer : 320; pl. 36, fig. 2. 1872 Heteroceras Reussianum (d’Orbigny) Schliiter : 109; pl. 32, figs 13-21; pl. 33, fig. 1. 1872 Helicoceras armatus d’Orbigny; Fritsch : 47; pl. 13, fig. 16; pl. 14, figs 8, 17 only. 1874 Helicoceras Reussianum d’Orbigny; Geinitz : 193, pl. 35, figs 11, 12. 1889 Helicoceras Reussianum Geinitz; Fritsch : 71, text-fig. 44. 1896 Heteroceras Reussianum (d’Orbigny); Woods : 74; pl. 2, figs 3-5. 1900 Hyphantoceras Roissyanum (Schiiiter); Hyatt : 587. 1910 Heteroceras reussianum (d’Orbigny); Crick : 347; pl. 27, fig. 3. 298 C. W. WRIGHT 1913 Hamites sp.; Roman & Mazeran: 19; pl. 4, fig. 19. 1951 Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny); Wright & Wright : 18. 2? 1957a Hyphantoceras cf. reussianum (d’Orbigny); Wright : 806; pl. 54, fig. 2a, b. DESCRIPTION. More or less irregularly coiled; some specimens consist of a fairly regular open or tightly coiled conical helix, with a pendent U-shaped body chamber (PI. 2, fig. 6); occasionally the helix is cylindrical (Schliiter 1872: pl. 32, fig. 18); in other cases the coiling is very irregular, especially in the later stages (Pl. 2, fig. 7). The cross section increases very slowly. The early stages of H. reussianum are similar (BM C79471 from Sparsholt, Berkshire) to the heterostrophic initial whorls of H. reflexum (Quenstedt) that have been figured (Fritsch 1872 : pl. 14, figs 14-16, 18). The major ribs at most growth stages are thin, high and distant on the body chamber and normally carry four fairly distinct tubercles, but at earlier stages they may have four, two or no tubercles. Between them is a variable number of ribs or striae. The suture is very similar to that of D. saxonicum. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. On the early whorls the major ribs may be closer than on the later but even on whorls only 2 mm high (BM C79471) there are two or three intermediaries, a feature which clearly distinguishes the species from H. reflexum, as Schliiter eventually (1876 : 166) concluded. H. flexuosum (Schliiter), which is of slightly later date than H. reussianum, differs in having less differentiated major and minor ribs and, apparently, no tubercles. Some loosely coiled specimens (e.g. PI. 7, fig. 4), show no major ribs, at least on internal moulds, on considerable lengths of shell. These are probably fragments of aberrant specimens of the present species. OccurRRENCE. H. reussianum is widespread in England and occurs both in the Chalk Rock and nodular facies and also occasionally in the normal Holaster planus Zone chalk of Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, from which several large U-shaped body chamber fragments have come. Abroad it is widely distributed in northern and central Europe and a probable example is recorded from New Zealand (Wright 1957 : 806; pl. 54, fig. 2a, b). Family SCAPHITIDAE Meek, 1876 The family apparently originates early in the Upper Albian and by the Cenomanian a variety of species of two groups, one involute and without lappets (Scaphitinae), the other evolute and with lappets (Otoscaphitinae), is widespread in most parts of the world. The case for maintaining these as subfamilies (Wright 1953) despite Wiedmann’s objections (1965) is being made in a separate paper. Only a very few species, however, seem to survive the end of the Cenomanian and it is not until the latter part of the Turonian that either stock becomes abundant again. The Scaphitinae begin at this time to radiate and during the Coniacian and Santonian there is great expansion in the number of species. The particular interest of the late Turonian forms described below is that they are beginning to foreshadow some of this expansion; the origins of several Coniacian species can be clearly seen among variants of the Scaphites geinitzii group. Subfamily SCAPHITINAE Meek, 1876 Several species and subspecies are distinguished below among the Chalk Rock fauna, but they are all closely related and a case could be made for treating most of them as variants of Scaphites geinitzii. Genus SCAPHITES Parkinson, 1811 TYPE SPECIES. S. equalis J. Sowerby, 1813. Scaphites geinitzii d’Orbigny (For synonymy see under the subspecies.) AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 299 DESCRIPTION. The size varies from about 20 to about 60 mm in greatest length and the maximum thickness ranges from about 35% to about 50% of the length. The density of ribbing is also variable. On the spire the ribs are normally slightly sinuous and the primaries split half to two- thirds of the way up the side into two to four secondaries. On the shaft and hook the primaries give rise to three to five secondaries. On the later part of the shaft and on the hook the point of branching is raised into a more or less distinct tubercle which varies from a feeble bulla in the compressed forms to a prominent one in inflated specimens. Normally these tubercles number between six and nine and there are no distinct umbilical ones. Inflated and compressed forms are equally involute; the beginning of the shaft conceals up to half or even more of the small umbilicus. The suture is relatively simple with rather regularly bifid lateral saddles and lobes. REMARKS. The name Scaphites geinitzii was first published by d’Orbigny in the Prodrome (2, 1850 : 214) as follows: * 58. Geinitzii, d’Orb., 1847. Espéce voisine du Scaphites obliquus, mais pourvue de plis tuberculeux externes. Scaph. aequalis, Geinitz (non Sowerby). France, Villedieu (Loire-et- Cher); Dresde, Strehlen. The asterisk indicates that d’Orbigny had specimens in his own collection. Monsieur J. Sornay has with great kindness sent me plaster casts of three specimens, labelled as from Strehlen, in the d’Orbigny collection, which he reports contains no Scaphites from Villedieu. Opinion 126 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (‘Opinions and Declarations’ 1, Sec. B, Facsimile Edition, London, 1958) lays down that the ‘Prodrome’ should be regarded as containing preliminary diagnoses and that the adequacy of the diagnosis is for the systematist to assess in each case. The diagnosis of Scaphites geinitzii differentiates the species from two earlier ones and refers to the characteristic outer tubercles. The name is certainly in common use for the abundant and widespread tuberculated Upper Turonian Scaphites of Europe. It seems reasonable to hold that the words of the description coupled with the mention of Strehlen and the survival in the d’Orbigny collection of Strehlen specimens amount to an adequate diagnosis. Of d’Orbigny’s three specimens, all more or less crushed, two clearly belong to the species generally known as Scaphites geinitzii. The third is either a different species, resembling Yabe’s Yezoites planus (1910: 167; pl. 18, fig. 14), or, more probably, a pathological specimen of S. geinitzii. I designate as lectotype a complete but distorted specimen, one of two numbered 7197, of which a plaster cast is here figured (PI. 3, fig. 1). A further nomenclatorial complication arises from the fact that R6mer described (1841 : 86; pl. 13, fig. 4) as Ammonites cottae a specimen that, despite Wiedmann’s (1965 : 430) reference to it as S. (Otoscaphites) cottae (ROmer), seems to me to be the spire of S. geinitzii. This conclusion has been reached by most subsequent authors, but none has taken the consequential step of reviving ROmer’s name in preference to geinitzii. In order to stabilize accepted usage an applica- tion to conserve the name geinitzii will be made to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. It is important to ascertain where the type lies in the rather wide range of forms included in S. geinitzii. The specimen figured in PI. 3, fig. 2 closely resembles the lectotype in whorl section, rib density and form of tubercles. It may safely be regarded as typical of the species. This specimen is the original of Woods (1896: pl. 3, fig. 6). Examination of the figures in the literature and of a fairly large number of specimens from the English Chalk Rock suggest that this variable species should be widely drawn. The stock seems to include in the Upper Turonian a range of forms differing in degree of inflation, density of ribbing and strength of ribs and tubercles. By the beginning of the Coniacian the variation is discontinuous and a number of good species can be separated. These are foreshadowed in the Upper Turonian material but most of it cannot be separated into distinct species. Subspecies however can be usefully distinguished in some cases and a limited number are established below. In all of these subspecies the degree of involution, the general pattern of ribs and tubercles and the direction of the ribbing on the shaft remain noticeably constant. 300 C. W. WRIGHT Apart from the subspecies here described there occurs in Germany (e.g. Schliiter 1872 : pl. 23, figs 2, 13) and Czechoslovakia an inflated form in which the ventrolateral tubercles become increasingly prominent and clavate. This is probably a slightly later offshoot of S. g. intermedius Scupin and leads directly to the Lower Coniacian S. meslei Grossouvre, which, pace Sturm (1901 : 61), followed by Scupin (1913 : 101), is not the same as S. kieslingwaldensis Langenham & Grundey (see p. 303). OCCURRENCE. S. geinitzii is recorded from the Zone of Terebratulina lata in this country, probably therefore from the horizon of Collignoniceras woollgari (as in Germany — Schliiter 1876 : 221) but good specimens are not known. It is abundant in the Zone of Holaster planus. It also ranges in England into the Zone of Micraster cortestudinarium (lower Coniacian) and in France (Aude) into the middle Coniacian. The occurrences in Saxony and Czechoslovakia were reviewed in an important paper by Prescher (1963). Scaphites geinitzii geinitzii d’Orbigny Pl. 3, figs 1-4, 6-7; Pl. 7, fig. 9 1840 Scaphites aequalis Sowerby; Geinitz : 40. 1841 Scaphites costatus Mantell; F. A. Romer : 90. 1841 Ammonites Cottae F. A. Romer : 86; pl. 13, fig. 4. 1850 Scaphites Geinitzii d’Orbigny : 214. Plate 3 xT Scaphites geinitzii d’Orbigny (above). Fig. 1. Upper Turonian, Strehlen, Saxony. Plaster cast of crushed lectotype. Musée d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 7197; d’Orbigny coll. Figs 2, 6, 7. Chalk Rock, Cuckhamsley Knob. Fig. 2 original of Woods 1896: pl. 3, fig. 6, 6a. Coll. Montague Smith. SM B4206, B4221, B4215. Fig. 3a, b. Hitch Wood. Coll. C. J. Wood. GSM 108884. Fig. 4. Hitch Wood. Coll. WW. BM C79475. See also Pl. 7, fig. 9. Scaphites pseudoaequalis Yabe (p. 305). Cuckhamsley Knob. Fig. 5. Original of Woods 1896: pl. 3, fig. 5, 5a. Coll. Montague Smith. SM B4205. See also Pl. 7, fig. 1. Scaphites geinitzii laevior subsp. nov. (p. 302). Fig. 8. Reed. Holotype, SM B594. Fig. 9. Cuckhamsley Knob. Paratype, coll. Montague Smith. SM B4208. See also Pl. 7, fig. 7. Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey (p. 303). Fig. 10. Cuckhamsley Knob. Coll. Montague Smith. SM B4212. Figs 11a, b, 12a, b. Hitch Wood. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. Fig. 11, broad-ventered form retaining the sinuous ribs of S. geinitzii on the spire. BM C79579. Fig. 12, form with weak tubercles on the hook. BM C79485. Scaphites lamberti doylei subsp. nov. (p. 304). Hitch Wood. Fig. 13. Holotype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79486. Scaphites diana sp. nov. (p. 304). Fig. 14a, b. Hitch Wood. Paratype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79515. Fig. 15. Cuckhamsley Knob. Holotype, coll. Montague Smith. SM B21299. Fig. 16a, b. Hitch Wood, Paratype, J. C. Doyle coll. 645. Otoscaphites reidi sp. nov. (p. 307). Fig. 17. Medmenham. Paratype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79498. Fig. 18. Hitch Wood. Para- type, coll. WW. BM C79511. See also Pl. 7, fig. 8. Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) (p. 305), Holaster planus Zone. Fig. 19. Mickleham bypass. Original of Wright & Wright 1945: pl. 5, fig. la—c (as Scaphites auritus). Coll. WW. BM C79517. Fig. 20. Guildford bypass. Original of Wright & Wright 1945: pl. 5, fig. 2a, b (as S. auritus). Coll. WW. BM C79518. Lewesiceras woodi sp. nov. (p. 312). Hitch Wood. Fig. 21a, b. Holotype, coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79509. See also Pl. 6, fig. 6. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 301 302 C. W. WRIGHT 1855 Ammonites wiltonensis Sharpe : 53; pl. 23, fig. 10. 1870 Scaphites Geinitzii d’Orbigny; C. F. Romer : 320; pl. 35, fig. 6. 1872 Scaphites Geinitzii d’Orbigny; Schliiter : 75; pl. 23, figs 14-16 only. 1872 Scaphites Geinitzii d’Orbigny; Fritsch : 42; pl. 13, fig. 12a—c only. 1874 Scaphites geinitzi d’Orbigny; Geinitz: 191; pl. 35, figs 1-4. 1889 Scaphites geinitzi d’Orbigny; Fritsch : 71, fig. 43. 1895 Ubergangsform zwischen Scaphites cf. Geinitzi var. Lamberti Grossouvre und Scaphites Geinitzi d’Orbigny; Jahn : 138; pl. 8, fig. 2a—d. 1896 Scaphites Geinitzi d’Orbigny; Woods : 81; pl. 3, figs 6, 7 only. DESCRIPTION. Compressed to moderately inflated. The ribs are rather coarse and slightly sinuous on the spire. On the shaft the primaries are broad and flat, branching at prominent pointed ventrolateral tubercles into three or four rather distant fine secondaries. On the hook the primary ribs are less flattened. Scaphites geinitzii intermedius Scupin 1872 Scaphites Geinitzii var. binodosus Romer; Fritsch : 42; pl. 14, fig. 13a, b. 1891 Scaphites geinitzii var. binodosa A. Romer; Jahn : 180, figs 1—S. 1907 Scaphites Geinitzi var. nov. intermedia Scupin : 696 (nom. nud.). 1913 Scaphites Geinitzi var. intermedia Scupin : 98. 1934 Scaphites geinitzi d’Orb. var. intermedia Scupin; Andert : 400. Type. The references by Scupin (1907 : 696, 704) are insufficient to characterize this form and since there is no figure or reference to a previous figure or description the name at this date is a nomen nudum. However, in 1913 Scupin gave a long description of this variety and of the typical form of S. geinitzii, together with a reference for intermedia to a figure of Jahn’s. The name is therefore established from this date. Scupin’s description is by no means clear but he apparently knew a number of specimens from various localities which he regarded as belonging to his var. intermedia. I designate here as lectotype of the subspecies intermedius Scupin the original of Jahn’s figures (1891 : 180, 181, figs 1-5, described as ‘Scaphites Geinitzii var. binodosa A. R6mer’). DESCRIPTION. Moderately compressed to inflated with strong rounded or bullate ventrolateral tubercles on shaft and hook, sometimes also on latter part of spire, and distinct umbilical bullae on the shaft. The primary ribs are only moderately strong. REMARKS. Scupin rightly regarded his variety as a transitional form between typical geinitzii, with ventrolateral tubercles only, and /amberti Grossouvre, with umbilical tubercles as well which are more prominent than the ventrolateral ones. Those specimens with umbilical tubercles approximately as large as the ventrolateral ones, such as the S. geinitzii var. binodosa of Fritsch (which Grossouvre included in his S. /amberti), were treated by Scupin as transitional between geinitzii intermedius and lamberti. On the sole basis of the proportions of the tubercles this might be reasonable, but it appears to be more useful to take other features into account as well. Typical Coniacian S. /amberti are characterized by very coarse, well-separated secondary ribs, springing on the shaft and hook in pairs from the ventrolateral tubercles. S. g. intermedius has closer and finer ribbing than this, as do all S. geinitzii, with at least three secondaries to each ventrolateral tubercle. OccuRRENCE. This subspecies does not occur in the Chalk Rock but seems to be widespread in the Upper Turonian of south Germany and Czechoslovakia. Scaphites geinitzti laevior subsp. nov. PIP 3 ies: 8; OMI, 7e ieee 1872 Scaphites Geinitzii d’ Orbigny; Schliter : pl. 23, figs 21 and ? 22 only. 1895 Scaphites Geinitzi dOrbigny; Jahn : 133; pl. 8, fig. 3a—d. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 303 Types. The holotype is SM B594 from Reed, and paratypes are SM B4208, 21298 and 21300 from Cuckhamsley, and IGS Zr 7788 from Kensworth. NAME. ‘Smoother’. DESCRIPTION. The density of the ribs on the spire is as much as twice that of the typical subspecies; the primary ribs on the shaft are less flattened and the ventrolateral bullae on the hook are thin and reduced. The greater rib density is owing partly to an increased number of primaries and partly to each primary being split into secondaries. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. S. planus Roman & Mazeran (1913: 13; pl. 4, figs 15-17) is a compressed and fine-ribbed form of the geinitzii group but the few small specimens on which the species was based are so poorly preserved that it is impossible to make out their characters adequately. If further material indicates that they are identical with S. geinitzii laevior the sub- specific name should be changed to planus. OccCURRENCE. This is a rather rare form in the Chalk Rock of Berkshire, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire and in the H. planus Zone of Surrey; it occurs also in Germany. Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey Pl. 3, figs 10-12 1891 Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey : 9; pl. 1, fig. 1. 1897 Scaphites binodosus Romer; Fritsch : 37, fig. 20. 1901 Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey; Sturm: 61; pl. 3, fig. 8. 1913 Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey; Scupin : 101. 1934 Scaphites kieslingwaldensis Langenhan & Grundey; Andert : 402; pl. 19, fig. 5. DESCRIPTION. This species is an inflated development of S. geinitzii with rounded rather than bullate ventrolateral tubercles on shaft and hook. Both the spire and the shaft are very inflated, the thickness being from 25% to 30% greater than in S. geinitzii; the whorl section of the spire may be almost circular; the venter of the hook is broad and in some examples nearly flat. Distinct rounded ventrolateral tubercles, varying in position from a half to two-thirds up the side, appear on the hook but are not in all cases clearly defined on the shaft. On the spire the primary ribs are rather thin and high, normally rectiradiate, rarely slightly sinuous and branch into two or three secondaries. On the shaft they are broad and blunt, varying in strength from weak to very pro- minent and, after a more or less distinct ventrolateral tubercle, each gives rise to three moderately strong secondaries. The holotype has twice been refigured photographically. Fritsch’s figure (1897 : 37, fig. 20) gives a clear idea of the species, but that of Sturm (1901 : pl. 3, fig. 8), perhaps the most accessible, is much retouched and gives a false impression of sharpness and narrowness of primary and secondary ribs. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The inflated members of the geinitzii group have generally in the past been referred to F. A. R6mer’s Campanian S. binodosus, which is bigger, less inflated and has ventrolateral tubercles already on the spire, while on the shaft they form a row of close prominent clavi. The Campanian S. inflatus Schliiter differs from binodosus only in having less clavate tubercles and in being more inflated, but the tubercles on the spire readily distinguish it from any of the Turonian group. Sturm, Scupin and Andert all treated S. kieslingwaldensis as a senior synonym of S. meslei Grossouvre, but that species has distinctly clavate ventrolateral tubercles on shaft and hook. Moreover, both S. mes/ei and S. lamberti Grossouvre, which does have rounded ventrolateral tubercles, are less inflated and have coarser ribbing than S. kieslingwald- ensis. However, it may well turn out if more material becomes available that /amberti and meslei should be treated as subspecies of kieslingwaldensis. It is close to geinitzii and it is difficult to draw the line between the variable forms of the two species. 304 C. W. WRIGHT REMARKS. There is considerable variation in the appearance of these small inflated Scaphites, deriving mainly from variation in the straightness or sinuosity of the ribs and the position on the flanks of the ventrolateral tubercles. There also seems to be a tendency for earlier forms to have distinct tubercles only on the hook, while later examples have them also on the shaft, but too few specimens from different localities and horizons are known for one to be sure. For the present I would regard all these variable specimens as belonging to a single species. OCCURRENCE. Rather rare in the Chalk Rock of Berkshire and Hertfordshire; it occurs also in central and northern Europe. Scaphites lamberti Grossouvre 1894 Scaphites Lamberti de Grossouvre 241: pl. 32, figs 1, 5. DESCRIPTION. A coarsely ribbed form with prominent bullate or circular ventrolateral and bullate umbilical tubercles on the shaft and hook. The ventrolateral tubercles may appear already on the last part of the spire. The ribs on the shaft are very strong and for the most part give rise to pairs of coarse, distant secondaries. The nominate subspecies, from the Coniacian, has strong umbilical tubercles and does not occur in England. Scaphites lamberti doylei subsp. nov. Riss hess 21872 Scaphites sp.? Schliiter : 76; pl. 23, figs 23-25. 1934 Scaphites lamberti Grossouvre; Andert : 402; pl. 19, fig. 4a, b. Ho.LotyrPe. BM C79486 from the Chalk Rock of Hitch Wood. Name. For Mr J. C. Doyle. DESCRIPTION. The ribbing is similar to that of the typical Coniacian subspecies but with relatively feeble umbilical tubercles. Although this form is transitional between the more closely ornamented specimens of S. kieslingwaldensis and S. lamberti it has the characteristic ribs and general aspect of the latter. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. S. g. intermedius is a comparable form but combines distinct umbilical tubercles with rather fine ventral ribbing. The spire figured by Jahn (1895: pl. 8, fig. la—d) as S. cf. geinitzii var. lamberti Grossouvre, from the Priesen Beds, seems to be a good deal more inflated and to have tubercles earlier than the English form. Schliiter’s Scaphites sp. (1872 : pl. 23, figs 23-25) may perhaps be referable to this subspecies. On the other hand, the figures give the impression of clavate ventrolateral tubercles; if they are accurate, the specimen probably belongs to a parallel subspecies of S. mes/ei Grossouvre. OCCURRENCE. It appears to be rare in the English Chalk Rock; the single undoubted specimen comes from Hitch Wood. Scaphites diana sp. nov. Pl. 3, figs 14-16 Types. The holotype is SM B21299; paratypes are SM B4225, B4239, B21301, BM C79515, J. C. Doyle coll. 645 and GSM 108906-7. NAME. From Diana of Ephesus, the “‘many-breasted mother’. DESCRIPTION. A compressed to slightly inflated and evolute Scaphites with sinuous primary ribs on the shaft and about twelve pointed ventrolateral tubercles on the shaft and hook. On the spire the ribbing is rather irregular; the distant, low, regular rounded and sinuous primaries split high up on the sides into two low secondaries which cross the venter with a forward bend. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 305 AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. This rather uncommon species is readily distinguished from all subspecies of S. geinitzii by the open umbilicus, which is hardly occluded at all by the beginning of the shaft, and by the sinuous primaries, curling back to the abundant ventrolateral tubercles. On the shaft and hook the primaries are markedly flattened and sinuous, curving back to the small but distinct ventrolateral tubercles and then branching into three to five secondaries which cross the venter transversely. The evolute spire and the ribbing on the spire somewhat resemble that of contemporary Otoscaphites but the tubercles are very distinct. S. compressus d’Orbigny from the Lower Coniacian of France (Sornay 1956) is similar and is probably a direct descendant of S. diana. It differs primarily in having finer and denser ribbing on the spire, and, above all, a prominent row of rounded umbilical tubercles on the shaft. OccURRENCE. Rather rare in the Chalk Rock of Cuckhamsley, Berkshire, Hitch Wood and Reed, Hertfordshire and Underwood Hall, Cambridgeshire. Scaphites pseudoaequalis Yabe Ries ip e Pl ai heL 1896 Scaphites geinitzi d’Orbigny; Woods : 81; pl. 3, figs 5, 5a only. 1910 Scaphites pseudoaequalis Yabe : 163; pl. 15 (1), figs 1-3. DESCRIPTION. Small inflated Scaphites with well-spaced, slightly recurved primary ribs, splitting on the outer third of the side into two to four secondaries which run straight across the venter. On the shaft both primaries and secondaries become relatively stronger and more distant. On the hook the outer ends of the primaries project slightly and almost form ventrolateral tubercles. There is a wide constriction and a very strong flat-topped collar before the aperture. Of the external suture all the major elements are distinctly bifid except for the second lateral lobe. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The only comment that Woods made on his single specimen of this species was that ‘in one small specimen the aperture of the shell has a projecting lip’. However, his specimen is rather distinct in proportions as well as in the aperture and is readily separated from all forms of S. geinitzii, particularly by the absence of any distinct ventrolateral tuberculation on the shaft. OCCURRENCE. Yabe’s specimens from the Scaphites Beds of Hokkaido are probably of Lower Coniacian date. Woods’ specimen came from Cuckhamsley (SM B4205) and two more have since been found by M. J. Oates at Kensworth (including GSM 115259). Subfamily OTOSCAPHITINAE Wright, 1953 This subfamily was erected for Worthoceras Scott and (pace Wiedmann, 1965) its derivative Otoscaphites Wright, small lappeted scaphitids more evolute and with a simpler suture and ornament than their unlappeted contemporaries. They range from low in the Upper Albian to the Coniacian and it is only in the latter stage that they exhibit any significant tuberculation. Wortho- ceras is known in the Upper Albian only from Texas but in the Cenomanian and Turonian it is widespread in North America and occurs in Europe, north Africa and New Zealand. Otoscaphites, arising in the Cenomanian, extends the range of the subfamily to include eastern Asia, New Zealand and California. Genus OTOSCAPHITES Wright, 1953 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites (?) bladenensis Schliiter. Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) Pl. 3, figs 19, 20 1871 Ammonites (?) bladenensis Schliiter : 30; pl. 10, figs 5, 6. 1872 Scaphites auritus Schliter : 77; pl. 23, fig. 9 only. 306 C. W. WRIGHT 1875 Ammonites Bladenensis Schliter; Barrois : 188. 1875 Scaphites auritus Schliiter; Geinitz : 192; pl. 35, fig. 10. 1925 Scaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) Diener : 197. 1945 Scaphites auritus Schliter; Wright & Wright : 126; pl. 5, figs 1, 2. 1951 Scaphites bladenensis (Schliter); Wright & Wright : 13. 1953 Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) Wright : 475. 1957a Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter); Wright : 807. 1965 Scaphites (Otoscaphites) bladenensis (Schliiter); Wiedmann : 430; pl. 58, figs 2-4, 6. LectotyPe. The original of Schliiter’s (1871) pl. 10, figs 5, 6 (Wright 1957a : 807). DESCRIPTION. Rather small with a very evolute spire, a short straight or curved shaft and a hook; the ends of the lappets overlap the spire. The whorl section of the spire is moderately compressed with gently convex sides and a narrowly rounded venter; there may be rather strong bifurcating sigmoid ribs, which bend forward slightly on the venter, giving the appearance of a Deshayesites, or the primaries may only be visible on the inner half of the side. Towards the end of the spire the umbilical shoulder, hitherto rounded, becomes sharper and on the shaft and hook it is distinctly angular; between it and the dorsal impression there is a distinct flat bevel. The sides of the shaft are flat and on shaft and hook the ribbing is weak and irregular; very feeble rounded or flat primary ribs spring at a forward angle from the umbilical shoulder, quickly straighten and run radially to the ventrolateral shoulder where they may break into very feeble fine riblets or con- tinue as obscure folds over the venter. At least in some specimens the periphery of the shaft and hook is not evenly curved but is made up of a series of short straight lengths. The aperture is preceded by a marked constriction and a high collar, vertical behind and sloping in front; there are long, parallel-sided lateral lappets, slightly turned up. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. When my brother and I described two Surrey specimens as Scaphites auritus (Wright & Wright 1945), we included in a single species all the specimens figured by Schliter (1872) as S. auritus and also those figured in the same year by Fritsch and described homonymously as S. auritus. Grossouvre (1894 : 243) had already renamed Fritsch’s specimens S. fritschi, distinguishing them from Schliiter’s S. auritus on the grounds that the ribs were less flexuous and more distant on the inner part of the side. In fact Schliiter’s three specimens are all different; only one of them has close flexuous ribs (1872: pl. 23, figs 7, 8) and this specimen is closely paralleled by one of Fritsch’s (1872: pl. 13, fig. 14). The other specimens on Fritsch’s pl. 13 are poorly preserved or consist only of the spire, while his pl. 14, fig. 12 represents a lappeted Scaphites of normal type. The Otoscaphites figured by Jahn (1895: pl. 8, fig. Sa—d) as S. fritschi Grossouvre is incomplete and does not help to clarify the characters of that species, if indeed it belongs to the same species as Fritsch’s specimens. By distinguishing the various forms and by designating lectotypes appropriately it is possible to make sensible use of all the available names. I have already designated as type of Ammonites (?) bladenensis Schliiter the original of his pl. 10, figs 5, 6. Wiedmann has (1965 : 429) pointed out that of Schliiter’s three specimens of ‘S. auritus’ only that figured in his pl. 23, fig. 9, is identical with bladenensis. Wiedmann also designated as lectotype of Scaphites auritus Schliiter the original of his pl. 23, figs 5, 6; this species is character- ized by its sharp umbilical tubercles from which spring directly bundles of three straight ribs. I do not agree with Wiedmann that Schliiter’s third specimen belongs to the same species; indeed he points out that in this, the ‘presumed paratype’, there are no tubercles. This specimen, as Wiedmann says, is identical with the original of Fritsch’s pl. 13, fig. 14, which I hereby designate as lectotype of Scaphites auritus Fritsch, a homonym of S. auritus Schliiter, and thereby of its replacement nominal species S. fritschi Grossouvre. This same species, S. fritschi, is characterized by rather sinuous, very fine and close ribs on the shaft and slightly coarser ribs on the hook which at first branch into two or three secondaries but are finally single; it is probably closer to O. reidi sp. nov. (see p. 307) than it is to O. bladenensis. O. reidi has a further distinctive type of ribbing consisting of very distinct but fine prorsiradiate primaries, each giving rise two-thirds up the side to two to four very fine secondaries that cross the venter almost transversely. O. awanuiensis Wright from New Zealand has a well-rounded whorl section even on the shaft, but rather depressed and coronate on the spire, and fine rather AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 307 distant primary ribs branching regularly into three secondaries on both spire and shaft. It is not, however, ‘undoubtedly Upper Turonian’ as I stated in 1954; Mr H. Wellman subsequently sent me a well-preserved specimen which was found in association with Hypoturrilites and Scaphites cf. equalis Sowerby of Cenomanian date. Henderson (1973) described and figured further Ceno- manian material. The Japanese Coniacian O. puerculus (Yabe) (1910: pl. 15) and its var. teshioensis (Yabe), with spire rather like that of O. bladenensis, have prominent primary ribs on the shaft which extend to the ventrolateral shoulder before subdividing; in the var. teshioensis there are distinct ventrolateral tubercles at the point of branching. O. minutus (Moreman), from the basal Turonian of the western interior of the U.S.A., has a whorl section much like that of O. awanuiensis, but much weaker ribs on shaft and hook and lappets splayed sideways. O. arnaudi (Grossouvre) is at once distinguished from all other species by having very sinuous branching ribs of more or less the same type on spire, shaft and hook. OccuRRENCE. O. bladenensis appears to be widely distributed in England and rather common in places, mainly in the nodular facies of the Holaster planus Zone in Kent and Surrey, but it also occurs rarely in the Chalk Rock of Hitch Wood. It occurs in Germany and Czechoslovakia. Otoscaphites reidi sp. nov. Piesy tgs 177183 Pl 7, ens 1957a Otoscaphites sp. (‘third undescribed European form’) Wright : 807. Types. The holotype is IGS Zr7952 from High Wycombe. Paratypes are BM C79498 (WW ex Reid coll.) from Medmenham, BM C79511-4 (WW coll.) and Doyle coll. 228 from Hitch Wood, and IGS Zr 7789 (Payne & Hogg coll.) from Kensworth. NAME. For Mr R. E. H. Reid. DESCRIPTION. The spire has weak, well-spaced, rounded ribs that branch indistinctly. The shaft is flat-sided with broadly rounded venter and is rather long; very distinct sharp primary ribs leave the sharp umbilical shoulder at a forward angle of about 45° forming a very slight tubercle at the edge; a quarter of the way up the side they turn sharply to a radial direction; at midflank they break into two or three fine close and slightly sinuous secondaries which, with occasional inter- calatories, cross the venter transversely. The hook expands rather rapidly until it is as wide as or wider than high, with rather flattened venter; here the primary ribs are sinuous and the secondaries more numerous and finer, in some parts absent. The apertural margin is well shown in the holo- type and has the typical constriction, collar and long lateral lappets of Otoscaphites. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. None of the species distinguished above under O. bladenensis have ribbing on the shaft like that of O. reidi. O. bladenensis itself is more compressed and has very feeble, blunt, rounded and more or less radial primaries on the shaft with fine almost obsolete secondaries. The specimen figured by Yabe (1910: pl. 15, fig. 24), described as O. puerculus var. teshioensis, has a close resemblance to O. reidi but is characterized by ventrolateral tubercles lacking in O. reidi. O. puerculus itself, if interpreted solely by the lectotype (Jimbo 1894: pl. 21, fig. 4, selected by Matsumoto, 1963 : 44), would seem to be very distinct from O. reidi, but Tanabe (1975) has recently demonstrated an evolutionary series in O. puerculus in presumed Middle Turonian, of which the earlier members (e.g. his pl. 10, figs 1, 2) are close to O. reidi. However, these O. puerculus seem to have a much less flat-sided shaft with sharper and more crescentic primary ribs and less distinct and regular secondaries than O. reidi. OccurRRENCE. Chalk Rock of Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire. 308 C. W. WRIGHT Family DESMOCERATIDAE Zittel, 1895 Subfamily PUZOSIINAE Spath, 1922 Genus PUZOSIA Bayle, 1878 TYPE SPECIES. Puzosia subplanulata (Schliter). It has been held that true Puzosia did not survive the end of the Cenomanian, and Turonian forms have consequently been attributed to Austiniceras or some other genus. However, several good species of the genus have been described from the Turonian of various parts of the world; most were referred to by Matsumoto in his paper on the Puzosiidae of Hokkaido and Saghalien (1954). Too few specimens have been collected yet for distinctions to be drawn with certainty or for time-ranges to be worked out for the various species. Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers Pl. 4, fig. 4; Pl. 7, fig. 3 21898 Puzosia gaudama (Forbes); Kossmat : 115; pl. 16, fig. 2a, b only. 1909 Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers : 68; pl. 2, figs 1-4. 1913 Puzosia gaudemarisi Roman & Mazeran : 19; pl. 2, figs 1, la, 2, 2a. 1922 Austiniceras (? ) curvatisulcatum (Chatwin & Withers) Spath : 128. 1951 Austiniceras (?) curvatisulcatum (Chatwin & Withers); Wright & Wright: 19. 1954 Puzosia orientale Matsumoto : 74; pl. 13, figs 1, 2a, b. 21954 Puzosia orientale kossmati Matsumoto : 75. 21959 Puzosia intermedia orientalis Matsumoto; Matsumoto : 16; pl. 4, fig. la—c. Types. The two syntypes, BM C12229a and b, from the Chalk Rock of Marlow, are probably fragments of one individual. In case of doubt, I select the larger fragment (C12229a) as lectotype. DESCRIPTION. Probably very large; the largest Chalk Rock specimen seen has a diameter of about 160 mm and the holotype of P. gaudemarisi figured by Roman & Mazeran (1913: pl. 2, fig. 1, 1a) has a diameter of 180 mm, but a fragment (BM C79656) from the Holaster planus Zone that probably belongs to this species is still septate at an estimated diameter of about 380 mm. Moder- ately compressed, the whorl thickness varying from 70% to 80% of whorl height; the greatest breadth is at about one-third of the whorl height. The umbilical wall is steep but rounded; the sides are flatter on early and more rounded on later whorls. On internal moulds there are visible five or six constrictions to a whorl, radial or slightly prorsiradiate on the inner part then curving moderately far forward and crossing the venter in a rounded arc. The strength of the constrictions varies slightly with age and between individuals. Fine, weak ribs are visible on the outer part of the sides and on the venter on internal moulds. On the shell the constrictions have a strong rib in front and many of the intermediate ribs arise on the umbilical shoulder even at small diameters. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The specimen figured in PI. 4, fig. 4 (BM C79501) was identified by Matsumoto as ‘closely allied to the inner whorl of Puzosia (s.s.) orientale Matsumoto [= P. gaudama Kossmat 1898, non Forbes] from Japanese Neogyliakian: Turonian; also resembling P. curvatisulcata Chat. & With. which has a more strongly impressed constriction and P. mulleri Plate 4 x1 Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright (p. 310). Hitch Wood. Figs la, b, 2, 3. Coll. R. E. H. Reid, BM C79481, C79500, C79480. See also Pl. 6, figs 4-5. Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers (above). Blount’s Farm Pit, Marlow. Fig. 4. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79501. See also Pl. 7, fig. 3. Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) (p. 313). Hitch Wood. Fig. 5. Coll. C. J. Wood. IGS Zr 7977. See also Pl. 5, fig. 1a, b (Same specimen) and PI. 6, figs 2-3. See Fig. 2, p. 313, for suture. 309 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 310 C. W. WRIGHT Gross., which is more compressed’. Better English material is now available than the two poorly- preserved fragments figured by Chatwin and Withers. Allowing for even a modest amount of variation in the strength of the constrictions and the proportion of height to breadth of whorl, both of which seem to change with growth, it seems to me impossible to maintain the specific distinction of P. orientalis and P. curvatisulcata. At the most it may be desirable to distinguish a Lower Turonian subspecies P. c. orientalis from an Upper Turonian P. c. curvatisulcata, but I doubt it. P. intermedia kossmati Matsumoto seems to differ sufficiently, in its more extreme forward bending of the ribs and constrictions on the outer part of the sides and in the sharper, denser ribbing, to be treated as a distinct subspecies of curvatisulcata. P. intermedia Kossmat I would treat as a distinct species on the basis of the precocious appearance of long ribs already at a diameter of 55 mm and their falcoid course. P. gaudemarisi Roman & Mazeran cannot in my view be distinguished from P. curvatisulcata. OccuURRENCE. Rather rare in the Chalk Rock of Blount’s Farm pit, Marlow, Hitch Wood and Kensworth; occurs also in the Upper Turonian of Uchaux, France and the Lower Turonian of southern India, Japan and California. Family PACHYDISCIDAE Spath, 1922 Genus LEWESICERAS Spath, 1939 TYPE SPECIES. Ammonites peramplus Mantell, 1822. Lewesiceras is characterized by its strong but irregular ribbing on the early whorls, the ribs bent forward ventrolaterally, with constrictions and umbilical tubercles; the ornament tends to weaken on later whorls except for distant bar-like primary ribs. The sutures are well spaced with minutely frilled elements and widely splayed lobes. The Turonian Ammonites peramplus Mantell was long regarded as typical of the family Pachy- discidae, but Spath rightly separated as Lewesiceras the Turonian species with strongly ribbed and tuberculate inner whorls from the restricted Pachydiscus of the Campanian and Maastrichtian. HouSa (1967) has reviewed Lewesiceras and distinguished two groups previously included in it, Menabonites and Tongoboryoceras; the latter occurs in the Chalk Rock (see p. 316). The genus ranges probably from the Cenomanian (Lewesiceras ? sp. from Algeria, figured as Pachydiscus sp. — Pervinquiére 1910: 37; pl. 3, figs 1, 2) to the Upper Turonian and perhaps Coniacian. Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright Pl. 4, figs 1-3; Pl. 6, figs 4, 5 1850 Ammonites prosperianus d’Orbigny; J. de C. Sowerby : 359; pl. 27, fig. 22. 1853 Ammonites peramplus Mantell; Sharpe (pars) : 26; pl. 10, figs 2, 3a, b only. 1870 Ammonites peramplus Mantell; C. F. Romer : 319; pl. 35, fig. 5. 1872 Ammonites peramplus Mantell; Schliiter : 31; pl. 10, figs 7-14. 1872 Ammonites peramplus Mantell; Fritsch : 38; pl. 8, fig. 4 only. 1874 Ammonites peramplus Mantell; Geinitz : 189; pl. 34, figs 5, 6, ? 4. 1896 Pachydiscus peramplus (Mantell) Woods : 79. 1913. Pachydiscus peramplus Mantell (Sowerby); Roman & Mazeran : 14; pl. 1, fig. 2 only. 1913 Pachydiscus vaju Stoliczka; Roman & Mazeran: 16; pl. 1, figs 5-9. 1926 Pachydiscus cricki Spath : 82 (non Kossmat 1898). 1927 Pachydiscus sharpei Spath; Billinghurst : 514; text-fig. 2a—c. 1951 Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright : 20. 1952 Lewesiceras mantelli Wright; Collignon : 84 (republished 1955 : 78). 1958 Lewesiceras peramplus (Mantell); Drushchitz, Michailov & Eristavi : pl. 52, fig. 2a—c. 1959 Lewesiceras peramplum (Mantell); Najdin & Shimanskij : 185; pl. 12, fig. 4a—c; pl. 13, fig. 4a, b. 1964 Lewesiceras romani Sornay : 183, text-figs 1-4. 1967 Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright; HouSa : 26; pl. 4, fig. 3 only; pl. 5, figs 1-4; ? pl. 6, figs 1-4. 1967 Lewesiceras lenesicense HouSa : 35; pl. 8, figs 1-7. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 311 Type. L. mantelli was a nom. nov. for Pachydiscus cricki Spath, 1926 (non Kossmat, 1898), of which the holotype by monotypy is BM 88587, the original of Sharpe, 1853 : pl. 10, fig. 3a, b. DESCRIPTION. Small (c. 90 mm diameter) to moderate in size, rather involute, the section depressed and coronate in the young but becoming higher with growth, varying from inflated and rounded on the body chamber to slightly compressed. To a diameter of 50 to 60 mm the umbilicus is surrounded by large and prominent laterally-directed spines (rounded tubercles on internal moulds) on the edge of the vertical umbilical wall, commonly six or seven to a whorl. The first distinct tubercle normally appears at a diameter of 11 mm and the second at 15 mm. From each spine branch two or three ribs, frequently with a marked constriction in front of the strongest. Shorter ribs are irregularly intercalated. All ribs tend to be weak on the inner part of the side and strongest on the shoulder where they may be angulate or rarely almost form tubercles (Pl. 4, fig. 2). Specimens with the more angulate shoulders naturally have a squarer whorl section than the normal ones. The ribs curve forward strongly and the more prominent ones, particularly those associated with constrictions, form distinct tongue-shaped ridges on the venter. From a diameter of about 60 mm the whorl is as high as wide, the umbilical spines become weaker and the ribs become more equal and less prominent. The last large spine normally appears at a diameter of about 65 mm, at which stage only the inner part of the ribs remain. At greater diameters there is normally little ornament except very weak umbilical bulges and faint swellings on the venter, but in some cases the ribs may persist ventrally to slightly greater diameters. The sutures are well spaced and do not interlock; the saddles are plump, subquadrate and regularly and minutely frilled; the lateral lobes are rather wide and irregularly trifid; the external lobe is little more than half as long as the first lateral. Specimens occur rarely with up to eleven umbilical spines (e.g. IGS 7981 from Hitch Wood and Zr 9329 from Kensworth — see PI. 6, fig. 4); in fact in such specimens the number of umbilical tubercles is normal on the inner whorls and the excess number only arises at the beginning of the body chamber. The original of d’Orbigny’s 1840: pl. 100, figs 1, 2 is perhaps such a form. A few specimens are known (e.g. BM 88709; PI. 6, fig. 5) with stronger, sharper and more regular ribs, resembling those of some Nowakites or even Canadoceras. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. Distinction from the earlier L. peramplum is difficult because that species is known mainly from very large, badly-preserved specimens. An individual of 60 mm diameter from the /noceramus labiatus Zone of Wharram, North Humberside (WW 9311, ex Stainforth coll.) accords reasonably well with the small L. peramplum figured by HouSa from the Lower Turonian of Czechoslovakia (1967: pl. 1, figs 1, 2) and is intermediate between the inner whorls of the Upper Albian Eopachydiscus laevicanaliculatum (ROmer) and the Upper Turonian L. mantelli. Compared with the latter it has somewhat more compressed and flatter-sided whorls, weaker umbilical tubercles, feebler constrictions and stronger and more regular intermediate ribs. L. plicatum HouSa (1967 : 32; pl. 7, figs 1-4) differs from the contemporary L. mantelli in being more compressed and in having denser ribs that persist with the juvenile sinuous character to a later stage. Certain undescribed Yorkshire specimens (WW 9310, 9313, ex Stainforth coll.) may be the inner whorls of L. plicatum. L. sharpei (Spath, 1926 : 82) was based on one of Sharpe’s figures of Ammonites peramplus (1853 : pl. 10, fig. la, b only). This figure, reduced to half natural size, is of a large but incomplete, rather compressed Lewesiceras with twelve weak umbilical bulges on the last-preserved whorl, but no other ornament; the inner whorls are missing. The specimen is quite unfit for the diagnosis of a species in this genus; it has not been traced and its precise horizon is unknown. L. sharpei (Spath) should be treated as a nomen dubium. Wright & Wright (1951 : 20) were wrong to include the original of Sharpe’s pl. 10, fig. 2 in L. sharpei; it is in fact a typical L. mantelli. The abundant Uchaux examples identified by Roman & Mazeran (1913) as Pachydiscus vaju (Stoliczka) and described as a new species L. romani by Sornay (1964) seem to be typical examples of L. mantelli; the stated grounds for distinction from L. mantelli were the more depressed whorl section and more numerous, rounded and prominent umbilical tubercles, but in these and all S12 C. W. WRIGHT other features the Uchaux specimens fall within the range of L. mantelli. P. vaju itself is a Santonian species and probably a Nowakites. The Malagasy L. beantalyense, L. sornayi and L. tongoboryense described by Collignon (1952, = 1955) all have much more rounded whorl sections than L. mantelli and have been separated from Lewesiceras by HouSa (1967) as Tongoboryoceras (see p. 316), while the Indian Pachydiscus anapadensis Kossmat and the Malagash L. masiaposense Collignon, both referred to Lewesiceras by Collignon (1952), are characterized by strong ventrolateral tubercles joined across the venter by fine looped ribs and have been placed by Hou§Sa in a new genus Menabonites. HouSa’s (1967) L. lenesicense is based on small specimens, all figured enlarged, which are typical L. mantelli. His far larger specimens attributed to L. mante/lli, many figured much reduced, may well belong to this species, but English material of the size of his largest specimens has not been found. That his interpretation of L. mantelli differs from mine can also be seen from a comparison of the specimens figured in the literature that are referred by each of us to this species, as indicated in our synonymies. However, some of the references to early nineteenth-century authors given in HouSa’s synonymy but omitted from mine may well refer to L. mantelli. NOMENCLATURE. This species is widely quoted as L. cricki (Spath). Collignon (1952 : 84, =1955: 78) objected, since the two species belong to different genera, to the renaming of the species because of the prior existence of Pachydiscus cricki Kossmat. He ignored however the fact that Spath established his species not as Lewesiceras cricki but as Pachydiscus cricki; such a primary homonym must under the Rules be renamed. OccuRRENCE. This is the commonest and most widespread ammonite in the Chalk Rock and indeed in the rest of the Holaster planus Zone, occurring even in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire. It is widely distributed in Europe, being recorded usually as Ammonites or Pachydiscus peramplus. It also occurs in the Terebratulina lata Zone (WW 14054 from the Guildford bypass, Surrey). Lewesiceras woodi sp. nov. Pl, 3; tig, 21 Pl. 6, fie 1973 Pseudopuzosia sp., Birkelund : 141; pl. 12. Types. The holotype is BM C79509 (WW ex Reid coll.) from the Chalk Rock of Hitch Wood; paratypes are BM C20239 from the Chalk Rock of Aston Rowant, Oxfordshire, C79504 (WW coll.) presumably from the Holaster planus Zone and probably from Kent, and C79520 (Gaster coll.) from the H. planus Zone of Malling Hill, Lewes; also Birkelund’s specimen MMH 12836, from Sardal, Sweden. NAME. For Mr C. J. Wood. DESCRIPTION. Rather compressed with distinctly flat subparallel sides and a low rounded venter. The ornament on the inner whorls is very feeble. There are eight or nine well-marked constrictions, radial on the inner part of the side, then curving forward but crossing the venter with only a slight bend. Behind each is a moderately strong rib, steep in front and shallow behind, raised into a slight bulla on the umbilical shoulder. Between constrictions there are two to four very feeble broad irregular ribs. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. This species is obviously a Lewesiceras derived from the main stock by reduction of the umbilical tuberculation and the ribbing. In these respects it resembles the inner whorls of Pseudojacobites and Tongoboryoceras but is readily distinguished by its relative compression, flatter sides, strong forward bend of the constrictions and main ribs on the ventro- lateral shoulders and by the well-spaced sutures typical of Lewesiceras. Birkelund’s Sardal specimen has these sutures and, though more than twice as big as any of the English specimens, exhibits the characteristic features of L. woodi. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 313 OccurRENCE. Rare in the Chalk Rock of Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire, in the H. planus Zone of ? Kent and Sussex and in the Upper Turonian of Sardal, Sweden. Genus PSEUDOJACOBITES Spath, 1922 [Pseudopuzosia Spath, 1926; Rotalinites Shimizu, 1935] TYPE SPECIES. Pachydiscus farmeryi Crick, 1910. Moderately evolute, inflated with strong constrictions, behind each of which is a strong rounded rib springing from an umbilical bulla, and weak irregular intermediate ribs. On the outer whorls there are strong ventrolateral and siphonal tubercles. The sutures interlock to a slight extent and have long narrow highly-divided bifid saddles and trifid lobes (Fig. 2). oN Fig. 2 Suture of Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick), x 2. Study of two well-preserved specimens collected in recent years has surprisingly demonstrated that the holotype of Desmoceras marlowense Noble, the type species of Pseudopuzosia Spath, consists of the inner whorls of a specimen of Pachydiscus farmeryi Crick, the type species of Pseudojacobites Spath. The genus is readily distinguished from Lewesiceras not only by the ventrolateral and siphonal tubercles on the outer whorls but also by the more depressed whorl section, straighter ribs and constrictions and the interlocking sutures with longer and narrower elements (cf. Fig. 2 and PI. 5, fig. 1). The tubercles and the weaker, less regular ribbing distinguish Pseudojacobites from Tongoboryoceras. Pseudojacobites ranges from Upper Turonian to Coniacian. The Santonian attribution of a species from Texas is doubtful. The genus is widespread but apparently always rare, occurring in Madagascar, southern India, Japan and Texas as well as England. Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) Biew2: BinAtier 52 Pl (5; fig. Ie Pl. 16;-figs 2533 1910 Pachydiscus farmeryi Crick : 345; pl. 27, figs 1, 2. 1911 Desmoceras marlowense Noble : 398, text-figs 1, 2. 1922 Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) Spath : 121. 1926 Pseudopuzosia marlowense (Noble) Spath : 80. 1954 Pseudopuzosia marlowensis (Noble); Matsumoto : 113, text-fig. 5. Types. The holotype, by monotypy, is BM C12220 from the Holaster planus Zone of Boswell, Lincolnshire; the holotype of Desmoceras marlowense Noble is GSM 25456. DESCRIPTION. Moderately evolute whorl section, increasing very sharply, wider than high and widest at the umbilical shoulder, with long, very slightly convex umbilical wall, slightly flattened sides and broadly rounded venter. There are eight constrictions well marked on the internal 314 C. W. WRIGHT mould, shallow and prorsiradiate on the umbilical wall, rectiradiate on the inner part of the side then curving very slightly forward to cross the venter in a very shallow arc or even transversely. Immediately behind the constriction and following the same course is a prominent well-rounded rib with a distinct large rounded-bullate tubercle on the umbilical shoulder. On the shell (partly preserved in GSM 108896) there is no constriction and the rib is stronger with a more bullate tubercle. From a diameter of about 45 mm, both on mould and shell, a broad rounded ventrolateral tubercle appears irregularly on main and intermediate ribs, becoming increasingly strong with growth producing a squarish whorl section. Slightly later, there appears on the mould behind each constriction a low rounded tubercle on either side of the siphuncle; on the shell even at this stage there was probably a single transversely elongated siphonal tubercle. RemarKS. Although the holotype of Desmoceras marlowense (PI. 6, fig. 2a, b) is worn in places and scraped in others, it is by no means as poor a specimen as has been believed. It had in fact been coated with layers of varnish and casting compounds so that its details became obscured. Now cleaned, it can be seen to coincide in all respects with the corresponding stages of the well- preserved specimen figured in PI. 5, fig. 1. The earliest traces of ventrolateral tubercles can just be seen on the abraded final part of the specimen. Crick’s holotype of P. farmeryi, once allowance is made for the lateral crushing and the fact that the specimen is a composite mould, compares very well with the original of Pl. 5, fig. 1. Further support for the identification of these specimens is provided by GSM 108896, which matches the holotype of marlowense and also has preserved a pseudomorph of part of the shell showing intermediate ribs like those of the holotype of farmeryi. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. Pseudojacobites seems to be rare wherever it occurs and only a handful of foreign specimens is known —a few P. rotalinus (Stoliczka) from the Coniacian of south India and Madagascar, two specimens of P. ankobensis Collignon (1965) and two of P. masiaposensis (Collignon, 1965) from the Upper Turonian of Madagascar, and the holotype of P. texanus Matsumoto (1966) probably from the Turonian of Texas. Of these P. masiaposensis (Collignon) (1955: pl. 1, fig. 1; 1965: pl. 380, fig. 1644) is very close to its contemporary P. farmeryi. It differs only in having much larger and more prominent tubercles, particularly the umbilical ones, and in its sharper and more regular doubled ribs on the venter. P. ankobensis Collignon (1965: 10; pl. 380, fig. 1643), another contemporary, ap- parently has a more precocious development of the ventrolateral and siphonal tubercles, but the umbilical ones are perhaps smaller than in P. masiaposensis. Plate 5 x 1 (Figs 8, 10 x 2) Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) (p. 313). Hitch Wood. Fig. la, b. Coll. C. J. Wood. IGS Zr 7977. See also Pl. 4, fig. 5 (same specimen) and PI. 6, figs 2-3. See Fig. 2, p. 313, for suture. Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) (p. 319). Hitch Wood. Figs 2a, b, 3a, b. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79519, C79655. Subprionocyclus branneri (Anderson) (p. 320). Hitch Wood. Fig. 4. Coll. WW. BM C79477. Figs 5a, b, 6a, b. Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79483, C79482. Subprionocyclus hitchinensis (Billinghurst) (p. 318). Figs 7-10. Hitch Wood. Fig. 7, Coll. R. E. H. Reid. BM C79472. Figs 8-10, Coll. WW. BM C79495, x2; C79484, x1; C79654, x2. Fig. 13. Holaster planus Zone, Guildford bypass. Coll. Mrs Suggate. BM C79474. Subprionocyclus sp. (p. 320). Reed Quarry, near Royston. Fig. lla, b. Coll. C. J. Wood. GSM 108932. Subprionocyclus normalis (Anderson) (p. 321). Hitch Wood. Fig. 12a, b. Coll. WW. BM C79494. See also Pl. 7, fig. 2. Photographs: Figs 5b and 12a by BM. 315 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 316 C. W. WRIGHT The Coniacian P. rotalinus (Stoliczka) has a more circular whorl section, has ten or more, rather than eight, primary ribs, which are more regular and prominent, and loses the fine secon- dary ribs at a diameter probably of about 45 or 50 mm, after which there are a few irregular coarse secondaries. P. texanus Matsumoto has a comparatively high whorl section, regular well-marked secon- daries nearly as strong as the primaries and rather small tubercles. Menabonites anapadensis (Kossmat) from the Coniacian of south India much resembles Pseudojacobites masiaposensis in its depressed whorl section and the ventrolateral tubercles on the outer whorl, but has no siphonal tubercles (see above, p. 312). OCCURRENCE. The holotype, BM C12220, from Boswell, Lincolnshire, is from normal chalk recorded as of the Holaster planus Zone; the remaining specimens come from the Chalk Rock of Hill End Farm pit, Hitch Wood and Blount’s Farm pit, Marlow. Genus TONGOBORYOCERAS Housa, 1967 TYPE SPECIES. Lewesiceras tongoboryense Collignon, 1952. HouSa (1967 : 42) rightly distinguished from Lewesiceras a group of species with uniform whorl section and more or less equal primary and secondary ribs. Study of the English specimens of T. rhodanicum Roman & Mazeran shows that there are other important generic characters. Tongo- boryoceras shares with Pseudojacobites a complex suture with long and relatively narrow elements compared with those of Lewesiceras. The early whorls of Tongoboryoceras, moreover, are smooth to a much later stage than those of Lewesiceras and the strong constrictions form a marked angle on the venter. Tongoboryoceras rhodanicum (Roman & Mazeran) PE 6; fies 17 1913 Pachydiscus rhodanicus Roman & Mazeran: 18; pl. 1, fig. 10a, b. 1954 Pseudopuzosia marlowensis Noble; Matsumoto : 113, text-fig. 6 only. 1967 Tongoboryoceras rhodanicum (Roman & Mazeran) Housa: 42. DESCRIPTION. Rather involute, with depressed whorl section about twice as wide as high, evenly rounded except for the long sloping umbilical wall. There are six to nine irregularly spaced wide constrictions to a whorl, well marked on the internal mould, broadly curved on the sides and crossing the venter with a sharp angle on earlier, more transversely on later whorls. The rib Plate 6 x 1 (Fig. 4 x 0-4) Tongoboryoceras rhodanicum (Roman & Mazeran) (above). Kensworth. Fig. la, b. Specimen with beginning of body chamber, coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 9330. Fig. 7a, b. Inner whorls, coll. M. J. Oates. GSM 115258. Pseudojacobites farmeryi (Crick) (p. 313). Fig. 2a, b. Blount’s Farm Pit, Marlow. Holotype of Pseudopuzosia marlowensis (Noble). GSM 25456. Fig. 3a, b. Hitch Wood. Coll. C. J. Wood. GSM 108896. See also Pl. 4, fig. 5 and PI. 5, fig. 1. Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright (p. 310). Fig. 4. Kensworth. Specimen with umbilical tubercles unusually strong and numerous on the body chamber, coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 9329, x0-4. Fig. 5. Oldbury Hill, Wiltshire. Fragment with unusually strong and regular intermediate ribs. BM 88709. See also Pl. 4, figs 1-3. Lewesiceras woodi sp. nov. (p. 312). Aston Rowant. Fig. 6a, b. Paratype. BM C20239. See also Pl. 3, fig. 21. Photographs: Figs 1-4, 7 by IGS; Figs 5, 6 by BM. 317 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 318 C. W. WRIGHT behind each constriction begins to become stronger from a diameter of about 25 mm, at which intermediate ribs first appear. From a diameter of some 75 mm all ribs are strong, broad and roun- ded, those on either side of the constrictions united on the umbilical shoulder in a large rounded- bullate tubercle. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The inner whorls (e.g. Wainwright coll. J.9 and GSM 115258, ex Oates coll.) demonstrate the close relationship with Pseudojacobites, but the absence of ventro- lateral and siphonal tubercles on the outer whorls and the strong, almost equal ribs distinguish the species and place it in Tongoboryoceras. The large Kensworth specimen figured on PI. 6, fig. 1 (IGS Zr 9330), which agrees well with the holotype, has the beginning of the body chamber preserved at a diameter of 95 mm. The specimen from the Toulmin Smith collection, locality unrecorded (BM 48764), which was figured by Matsumoto (1954: text-fig. 6) as Pseudopuzosia marlowensis, in fact belongs to the present species. It has the prolonged smooth early stage with strong constrictions, angulate on the venter, but the strong intermediate ribs are beginning to appear on the last part preserved. From the closely related Malagasy Coniacian 7. beantalyense (Collignon) T. rhodanicum differs in having ribs that are slightly curved but not sinuous and much lower and blunter; its con- strictions persist to a later stage. T. tongoboryense (Collignon) has even more sinuous ribs and a more depressed whorl section. The Turonian 7. donovani (Collignon) is less depressed than T. rhodanicum but 1s otherwise very similar; the only specimen is too small to show whether the marked feebleness of the ribs persists or not. OccuRRENCE. Chalk Rock of Kensworth and Blount’s Farm pit, Marlow (IGS JM 1354) and chalk immediately above the Chalk Rock at Hitch Wood (IGS Zr 7975); Upper Turonian of Uchaux, France. Family COLLIGNONICERATIDAE Wright & Wright, 1951 Genus SUBPRIONOCYCLUS Shimizu, 1932 [Oregoniceras Anderson, (1941 nom. nud.) 1958; Ledoceras Basse de Ménorval, 1962] TYPE SPECIES. Prionocyclus hitchinensis Billinghurst, 1927. The type species is at one extreme of a group of closely allied forms with rather a wide morpho- logical range. The ornament changes somewhat with growth, so that fragments of individuals of different growth rates may be difficult to identify. However, by admitting a reasonable degree of variation in density and strength of ribs and tubercles, a satisfactory grouping into a small number of species can be made. Matsumoto (1959) has fortunately reduced to order the species from California and Oregon and it is simple to tie these in with the European species. The genus is of particular phylogenetic, and therefore stratigraphic, interest since it appears to be the source of a number of the more important Coniacian and later ammonite stocks. The evolute and coarsely-ribbed S. branneri, for example, probably gave rise directly to Protexanites and Paratexanites, of the Texanitinae; S. normalis, on the other hand, appears to grade into Reesidites and hence to lead to Barroisiceras (Barroisiceratinae). Subprionocyclus hitchinensis (Billinghurst) Pl. 5, figs 7-10, 13 1927 Prionocyclus hitchinensis Billinghurst : 516; pl. 16, figs 1, 2. 1932 Subprionocyclus hitchinensis (Billinghurst) Shimizu : 2. 1951 Prionocyclus hitchinensis Billinghurst; Wright & Wright : 30. 1954 Subprionocyclus hitchinensis (Billinghurst); Wright & Matsumoto : 129. Types. The holotype is BM C32292 from Hitch Wood; paratypes are BM 23156 from the ‘Middle Chalk of Kent’ and C32293 from Hitch Wood. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 319 DESCRIPTION. Very compressed, the whorl section widest at the umbilical tubercles, the sides flat or slightly convex, subparallel to gently convergent, involute, with steeply rounded to undercut umbilical wall. The ribs are wiry and rounded at first but later tend to be flat, at least on the outer part; they are prorsiradiate and slightly sinuous. In the early stages they are single and more or less equal but later arise in twos and threes from slight umbilical bullae; later still they may be more clearly differentiated into primaries with umbilical bullae and about twice as many branching or intercalated secondaries. The ribs end in more or less distinct ventrolateral thickenings or tubercles; on most specimens there are, at some growth stage, perceptible though feeble inner ventrolateral tubercles, but they are normally absent in the young. The keel on internal moulds is entire at first but later develops weak to strong serrations. There is some variability in the strength and density of the ribs. Some specimens have rather stronger and more distant ribs with more distinct ventrolateral tubercles; these individuals (e.g. Pl. 5, figs 9, 13) are also rather less involute and have less convergent sides and a flatter venter with a more crenulate keel. Thus they somewhat resemble some specimens of S. normalis (Anderson), but their ribs are not as flat or as coarse, at corresponding diameters, as in that species. The suture has rather narrow, deep and coarsely and irregularly subdivided elements; the first lateral (‘external’) saddle is marked in some individuals by well-developed ‘oblique trifidity’ such as characterizes Diaziceras and other members of the Barroisiceratinae. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. S. hitchinensis is readily distinguished from S. branneri and S. neptuni by its involution and compression, and from S. normalis (which it resembles in these features) by its finer and denser ribs, which are also less emphatic and less tuberculate on the shoulders. OccuRRENCE. S. hitchinensis is widespread in the Chalk Rock and the nodular facies of the Holaster planus Zone and has even occurred in the normal chalk at this horizon in Devon (BM C79657, WW ex Reid coll.). Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) ll, Dy ines 2, 3 1841 Ammonites bravaisianus d’Orbigny : 308; pl. 91, figs 3, 4. 1842 Ammonites falcatus Mantell; Geinitz : 67 (non Mantell). 1850 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz : 114; pl. 3, fig. 3. 1855 Ammonites Bravaisianus d’Orbigny; Sharpe : 52; pl. 23, figs 8, 9. 1872 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Schliiter : 36; pl. 11, figs 2, 5, 7, 8, ? 9 only. 1872 Ammonites Bravaisianus d’Orbigny; Fritsch : 29; pl. 8, fig. 5; pl. 16, fig. 4. 1872 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Fritsch : 30; pl. 3, fig. 4 only (non pl. 2, fig. 3 nec pl. 14, fig. 3). 1872 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Geinitz : 85; pl. 36, fig. 4. 1874 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Geinitz : 280; pl. 62, fig. 4. 1875 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Geinitz : 185; pl. 36, fig. 4. 1877 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Fritsch : 101. 1896 Prionocyclus Neptuni (Geinitz) Woods : 77; pl. 2, fig. 11; pl. 3, figs 1, 2 only. 1902 Schloenbachia knighteni Anderson : 119; pl. 1, figs 1-4; pl. 2, figs 39, 40. 1902 Schloenbachia siskiyouensis Anderson : 119; pl. 1, figs 19, 20. 1913 Prionotropis bravaisianus (d’Orbigny) Roman & Mazeran : 22; pl. 1, figs 13-18. 1931 Prionotropis neptuni (Geinitz) Collignon : 24; pl. 4, figs 1, 2. 1951 Prionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz); Wright & Wright : 30. 1954 Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) Wright & Matsumoto : 129. 1958 Oregoniceras knighteni (Anderson); Anderson : 264; pl. 24, fig. 5; pl. 33, figs 1, 3 (? non fig. 2). 1958 Oregoniceras siskiyouense (Anderson); Anderson : 266; pl. 23, figs 2, 3; pl. 24, figs 1-3. 1958 Oregoniceras jillsoni (Anderson); Anderson : 267; pl. 19, fig. 6. 1959 Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz); Matsumoto : 112; pl. 29, figs 2, 3; pl. 30, figs 2, 3; text-figs 60-63. Lectotype. The original of Geinitz’ figure (1850: pl. 3, fig. 3) was designated by Matsumoto C1959 112): 320 C. W. WRIGHT DESCRIPTION. Moderately but variably involute, rather compressed, the whorl section higher than wide with the sides, at least in costal section, almost parallel for the inner two-thirds or three- quarters, then converging slightly towards the flat to slightly fastigiate venter with its distinct keel. The earliest ribs are low and rounded, rising in twos or threes from indistinct umbilical tubercles. Thereafter to a diameter of 16 to 18 mm (the maximum of most Uchaux specimens — see below) they are rather high and narrow, separated by wider interspaces, arising somewhat irregularly at or near the umbilical shoulder singly or in pairs, rarely in threes, from subdued umbilical tubercles or alternately long and short; the specimen shown in PI. 5, fig. 2a, b has branching ribs on one side and alternately long and short on the other. The ribs are more or less straight but prorsiradiate until a slight inner ventrolateral tubercle at which they bend sharply forward and end in neat outer ventrolateral clavi. The venter is normally smooth. The keel on internal moulds may be apparently entire or weakly to strongly crenulate. The crenulations are well forward of the corresponding ventrolateral clavi. Normally at a diameter of 16 to 18 mm the ribs become more distant and to a variable extent flatter in their outer part; the specimen shown in PI. 5, fig. 3 (BM C79655) for example retains the characteristic ribbing of the middle stage until the body chamber. The coarse distant ribbing with correspondingly strong tubercles may persist or may be replaced by closer ribs with the inner ventrolateral tubercles weak or absent, the outer ones reduced and the ribs joining the keel in chevrons on the venter. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. S. neptuni is more involute than S. branneri and has more prorsi- radiate, closer and wider ribs and weaker tubercles at corresponding diameters. Some individuals with typical neptuni inner whorls, however, have a period of growth with ribs and tubercles like those of branneri. The coarsely-ribbed adults figured by Matsumoto (1959: pl. 29, figs 2, 3; pl. 30, figs 2a, b) are somewhat outside the morphological range found so far in the Chalk Rock. S. hitchinensis and S. normalis are both more involute and compressed than S. neptuni and S. normalis has flatter and more sinuous ribs at all stages. A few fragments (Bromley coll. C.151 and GSM 108932 — see Pl. 5, fig. lla, b) that at first seem very distinct from S. neptuni or any other species of the genus are provisionally included here; they are very evolute and have regular single ribs more prorsiradiate, especially in the outer part, than in typical neptuni and a rather narrower venter. The specimen from the Unter Planer of Plauen figured as neptuni by Geinitz (1875: pl. 62, fig. 4) and included by Woods in the syno- nymy of this species appears to be a Watinoceras from the basal Turonian. NOMENCLATURE. Examination of specimens showing early and middle growth stages demon- strates that S. bravaisianus and S. neptuni cannot be maintained as separate species. In their paper on the Uchaux fauna, Roman & Mazeran (1913) refigured d’Orbigny’s types and their photo- graphs leave little doubt about the synonymy of the two species. In fact none of the presumed syntypes is large enough to provide an adequate diagnosis for a species in this genus; their range of variation is greater than the difference between the lectotypes of bravaisianus (Matsumoto & Noda 1966 : 359) and neptuni. The prior name is bravaisianus but apart from Moreman’s (1927: 96) description of a specimen as Gauthiericeras aff. bravaisi (d’Orbigny), passing references by Collignon (1931 : 26) and Basse de Ménorval (1959 : 16, 18) and Matsumoto & Noda’s paper (1966) the name has been seldom used since 1913, whereas neptuni is regularly and widely used. An application will be made to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to conserve the well-known name neptuni. OcCURRENCE. S. neptuni is fairly common and widespread in the Chalk Rock and the nodular facies of the Holaster planus Zone. It is widely distributed in north and central Europe and occurs also in southern France, north Africa, Madagascar, California and Oregon. Subprionocyclus branneri (Anderson) Pl. 5, figs 4-6 1872 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Schliter : 36; pl. 11, fig. 1 only. 1896 Prionocyclus Neptuni (Geinitz) Woods : 77; pl. 3, fig. 3 only. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 321 1902 Prionotropis branneri Anderson : 125; pl. 1, figs 11-16. 1927 Prionotropis cristatus Billinghurst : 515; pl. 16, fig. 3a—c. 1951 Collignoniceras cristatum (Billinghurst) Wright & Wright : 30. 1954 Subprionocyclus cristatus (Billinghurst) Wright & Matsumoto : 129. 1958 Prionotropis branneri Anderson; Anderson : 261; pl. 34, figs 1-3. 1959 Subprionocyclus branneri (Anderson) Matsumoto : 109, text-figs 58, 59. DESCRIPTION. Rather evolute, whorl section more or less rectangular to square, with sharp, high, coarsely crenulate keel. The ribs are typically almost rectiradiate, simple, high and sharply rounded on the inner whorls but increasingly flattened on the outer; they arise near the umbilical seam, form a pinched bulla on the umbilical shoulder and have two regular and prominent ventrolateral clavi; the corresponding siphonal serration on the keel is well forward of the ventrolateral tubercle. In some individuals, however, a few or even a majority of the ribs spring in pairs from umbilical tubercles. Both types of individuals occur together in the English Chalk Rock and it seems doubtful whether subspecific separation, as provisionally suggested by Mat- sumoto (1958: 111), is necessary. Some specimens, moreover, have slightly curved and prorsi- radiate ribs (e.g. Wainwright coll. J.15). The suture is as might be expected distinctly simpler, with fewer and shallower indentations than in the more involute and compressed members of the genus. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. The squarer whorl section and the more nearly rectiradiate distant ribbing with distinct inner and outer ventrolateral tubercles throughout readily distinguish this species from S. neptuni. The other species are all much more involute and compressed. S. branneri foreshadows Protexanites in its ribbing and tuberculation but is at once distinguished by the siphonal tubercles being well forward of and higher than the corresponding outer ventro- lateral tubercles. At least one specimen of S. branneri (PI. 5, fig. 6a, b) has incipient midlateral tubercles such as appear in many Texanitinae. OccurRRENCE. S. branneri seems to be rather rare in the Chalk Rock except at Hitch Wood and Kensworth. It occurs sparsely in Germany and Oregon and possibly at Uchaux. Subprionocyclus normalis (Anderson) Pi pel 2a, bs Piya ties2 1872 Ammonites Neptuni Geinitz; Schliiter : 36; pl. 11, figs 3, 4 only. 1872 Ammonites cf. goupilianus d’Orbigny; Schliter : 37; pl. 11, fig. 10. 1958 Oregoniceras normale Anderson : 268; pl. 25, fig. 8, 8a. 1959 Subprionocyclus normale (Anderson) Matsumoto : 118; pl. 29, fig. 1; pl. 31, figs 1-5; text-figs 64-66. 21962 Ledoceras massoni Basse de Ménorval : 871; pl. 22, figs 1-8; pl. 23, fig. 2a; pl. 24, figs 1-5. DESCRIPTION. Compressed, moderately to very involute and high-whorled with steep to vertical or even undercut umbilical wall and very slightly convex sides. The whorl section is widest just below mid-flank. The venter is flat to fastigiate. The ribs, rising singly or in pairs from slight umbilical tubercles or intercalated, are slightly sinuous to falcoid and prorsiradiate, bending forward more sharply at faint inner ventrolateral clavi, which are absent in early and late growth stages, and ending at moderately strong outer ventrolateral clavi. On the body chamber the inner ventrolateral tubercle disappears, the outer one and the ribs become weaker and the venter more fastigiate, so that there is great similarity to Reesidites subtuberculatus (Gerhardt), R. minimus Hayasaka & Fukada and certain Barroisiceras. The number of umbilical tubercles and ribs varies widely in the American material and the few English specimens fall at the more densicostate end of the range of variation. AFFINITIES AND DIFFERENCES. S. normalis can be considered a compressed and involute version of S. neptuni or a flat and sparsely-ribbed version of S. hitchinensis. The Californian population is variable; according to Matsumoto (1959 : 120-1) the ratio of umbilical to total diameter ranges from 15% to 30%, the number of umbilical bullae from 7 to 14 and of ribs from 22 to 35. A 32) C. W. WRIGHT Chalk Rock specimen in A. Wainwright’s collection (J.15) has, at a diameter of 40 mm, an um- bilicus 22:5° of the total diameter, 15 umbilical bullae and 30 ribs. Some of the characters overlap those of S. neptuni, but normalis differs in being more compressed and involute, with a narrower umbilicus, more fastigiate venter, weaker ornament, sinuous ribs and a shorter stage in which both inner and outer ventrolateral tubercles are present. Californian specimens apparently have only a steeply sloping umbilical wall, whereas the English specimens have it vertical or undercut. As Matsumoto (1959: 121) points out the resemblance to Reesidites is so close that S. normalis may be regarded as phylogenetically intermediate between S. neptuni and Reesidites minimus. Only the brief appearance of lower ventrolateral tubercles indicates the place of normalis in Subprionocyclus. Basse de Ménorval’s Ledoceras massoni, whose holotype is a young Uchaux individual figured at twice natural size, includes specimens with slightly more ribs than the most densely costate Californian specimens figured by Matsumoto (1959), but other features are so similar that even subspecific separation seems unnecessary. The Uchaux and English specimens probably occur at a slightly earlier horizon than the Californian ones and the median point of variation in the populations has probably shifted. OcCURRENCE. Rare at Hitch Wood and Kensworth. It occurs also in the Holaster planus Chalk of Surrey and in France and Germany. General results and correlations The fauna of the Chalk Rock, occupying at most a part of the lower half of the Holaster planus Zone, is, with its relatively numerous species of ammonites, of considerable importance for Plate 7 x1 (Fig. 1 x3, Fig. 12a x1-7, Fig. 12b x 1:6) Scaphites pseudoaequalis Yabe (p. 305). Kensworth. Fig. la, b. Coll. M. J. Oates. GSM 115259, x 3. See also Pl. 3, fig. 5. Subprionocyclus normalis (Anderson) (p. 321). Kensworth. Fig. 2. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 9331. See also Pl. 5, fig. 12. Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers (p. 308). Kensworth. Fig. 3a, b. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7785. See also Pl. 4, fig. 4. Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny) (p. 297). Fig. 4a, b. Kensworth. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 8010. Fig. 6, 14ml (2 km) SW of Dunstable. Closely coiled specimen cited by Woods (1896 : 75). GSM 36955. See also Pl. 2, figs 6-7. Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) (p. 296). Kensworth. Fig. 5. Specimen showing the earliest regular whorl, coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7828. See also Pl. 2, figs 8-12. Scaphites geinitzii laevior subsp. nov. (p. 302). Kensworth. Fig. 7a, b. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7788. See also Pl. 3, figs 8-9. Otoscaphites reidi sp. nov. (p. 307). High Wycombe. Fig. 8. Pit behind Broom & Wade factory. Holotype, coll. C. J. Wood. IGS Zr 7952. See also Pl. 3, figs 17-18. Scaphites geinitzii geinitzii d’Orbigny (p. 300). Kensworth. Fig. 9. Specimen with subdued ornament, coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7786. See also Pl. 3, figs 1-4, 6-7. Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) (p. 285). Kensworth. Figs 10a, b. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7804. Figs 12a, b. Coll. M. J. Oates. GSM 115260: Fig: 12a, x1-7. Fig. 12b; x 1-6: See also PI: 1, figs 3=5: Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny (p. 287). Kensworth. Fig. lla, b. Coll. P. R. Payne & R. J. Hogg. IGS Zr 7803. See also PI. 1, figs 6-8. Photographs by IGS, except Figs 2, 4a, b, 5, 6, 7a and 8 by BM. 373 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 324 C. W. WRIGHT correlation. As described above, it includes a number of abundant and well-known species as well as various less well known ones and a few genuinely new forms, as listed in the Contents, p. 281. It is particularly interesting that in various different stocks the beginnings of important evo- lutionary radiation can be seen at this horizon. For example, Baculites undulatus, probably the earliest species of its genus, clearly foreshadows a whole range of Coniacian and later species. The Scaphites geinitzii group contains among its many variants the predecessors of a number of Coniacian species. Lewesiceras itself is of somewhat restricted morphological range but with Tongoboryoceras and Pseudojacobites, its presumed derivatives, can be seen as the source of several later genera. Subprionocyclus includes S. branneri that clearly leads to Protexanites and the whole of the Texanitinae, and S. normalis that leads to Reesidites and thence to the Barrois’- ceratinae. There are several European faunas with which that of the Chalk Rock should be compared. The most important is that of Uchaux in south-eastern France, since there also occur there a number of species characteristic of the widespread Tethyan faunas. Unfortunately little is known of the exact horizon of the various ammonite species. Roman & Mazeran (1913) figured 18 species from Uchaux, of which eight, on the basis of the revised determinations given below, also occur in the Chalk Rock. In addition, Basse de Ménorval’s (1962) Ledoceras massoni from Uchaux is probably a synonym of Subprionocyclus normalis and Sornay’s (1964) Lewesiceras romani is a synonym of L. mantelli. Roman & Mazeran, 1913 Revised determinations Macroscaphites rochatianus d’Orbigny Worthoceras rochatianum (d’Orbigny) Hamites gracilis @ Orbigny Scalarites (2) gracilis (d’Orbigny) Hamites sp. Hyphantoceras reussianum d@’Orbigny Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny Baculites undulatus d’Orbigny Turrilites cf. costatus Lamarck Turrilites cf. costatus Lamarck Scaphites aequalis Sowerby mut. turonensis Scaphites equalis turonensis Roman & Mazeran nov. mut. Pachydiscus peramplus Mantell (Sowerby) Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright and Lewesiceras sp. indet. Pachydiscus vaju Stoliczka Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright Pachydiscus rhodanicus sp. nov. Tongoboryoceras rhodanicum (Roman & Mazeran) Puzosia gaudemarisi sp. nov. Puzosia curvatisulcata Chatwin & Withers Puzosia sp. indet. Prionotropis bravaisianus Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) Prionotropis sp. (pl. 1, figs 18, 19) Subprionocyclus cf. normalis (Anderson) Prionotropis sp. (pl. 4, fig. 18) Subprionocyclus cf. branneri (Anderson) Acanthoceras deverianum @Orbigny Romaniceras deverianum (d’Orbigny) Leoniceras groupe de segne Solger Choffaticeras (Choffaticeras) sp. Coilopoceras requienianum (d’Orbigny) Coilopoceras requienianum (d’Orbigny) Despite the two apparent Cenomanian survivors (Turrilites cf. costatus and Scaphites equalis turonensis) the Lewesiceras, Tongoboryoceras and Subprionocyclus common to the faunas of Uchaux and the English Chalk Rock indicate a close approximation of date. The German Scaphiten Planer has produced specimens of most of the species recorded from the Chalk Rock, but published stratigraphical information is inadequate to determine whether they all come from a restricted horizon or not. Schliiter (1876 : 222) lists from various localities the following species, given here with revised determinations. Schliiter, 1876 Revised determinations Ammonites peramplus Mant. Lewesiceras mantelli Wright & Wright Subprionocyclus neptuni (Geinitz) Subprionocyclus branneri (Anderson) Ammonites cf. Goupilianus d’Orb. Subprionocyclus normalis (Anderson) Ammonites Germari Reuss Germariceras germari (Reuss) Ammonites neptuni Gein. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 325 Ammonites Bladenensis Schlit. Scaphites Geinitzi d’Orb. Scaphites auritus Schlit. Crioceras ellipticum Mant. Heliococeras spiniger Schliit. Helicoceras conradi Mort. Heteroceras reussianum d’Orb. Turrilites saxonicus Schliit. Baculites cf. Bohemicus Fr. & Schlonb. Schliiter also figured from this horizon: Scaphites sp. ? Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) Scaphites geinitzii geinitzii d’Orbigny sei geinitzii laevior subsp. nov. Scaphites geinitzii aff. intermedius Scupin Otoscaphites auritus (Schliter) Otoscaphites bladenensis (Schliiter) Otoscaphites fritschi (Grossouvre) eee angustum (J. de C. Sowerby) Allocrioceras strangulatum sp. noy. 9 9 Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny) Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) Sciponoceras bohemicum (Fritsch) fea lamberti doylei subsp. nov. or Scaphites meslei Grossouvre, subsp. nov. The Czechoslovakian Teplitzer beds seem to be somewhat later than the Chalk Rock but precise correlation is impossible on the basis of the literature that I have seen. Fritsch (1899) figures or records the following. Fritsch, 1889 Ammonites (Schloenbachia) subtricarinatus d’Orb. Ammonites peramplus Mant. Ammonites (Desmoceras) Austeni Sharpe Scaphites Geinitzii d’Orb. Helicoceras Reussianum d’Orb. Helicoceras polyplocum Rom. Revised determinations Peroniceras subtricarinatum (d’Orbigny) oe mantelli Wright & Wright Lewesiceras sp. ? Gaudryceras sp. Scaphites geinitzii d Orbigny Hyphantoceras reussianum (d’Orbigny) Didymoceras saxonicum (Schliiter) Baculites undulatus d’Orb. Baculites undulatus @ Orbigny From California Matsumoto (1959) recorded Subprionocyclus neptuni and S. normalis from the Upper Turonian, and said that the former occurred earlier than the latter. Unfortunately, however, a stratigraphically collected series of specimens of Subprionocyclus has not yet been described, although California seems to be the most promising area for such a project. These two species occur also in Japan but not enough material seems to be available yet for any refined correlation within the Zone of Inoceramus teshioensis (Matsumoto 1971 : 155). Such evidence as there is points to fairly long ranges for important species such as Scaphites geinitzii, Didymoceras saxonicum, Hyphantoceras reussianum, Lewesiceras mantelli, Subpriono- cyclus neptuni and S. normalis. Even within the Chalk Rock fauna itself the extent of morpho- logical variation of these species is considerable. Over the whole duration (biochron) of each of these species the mean of the morphological range presumably varied with time, but we are very far from knowing enough of any one population or of the succession of populations in the Upper Turonian to be certain of detailed correlation or to be able to establish refined zonal schemes valid over a wide area. It is for example possible that evidence will eventually be secured for a zone of Subprionocyclus normalis above one of S. neptuni or of a subzone of normalis within a broad neptuni zone. However, even in California and Japan the published evidence does not yet support such an arrangement. What is certain, from the Chalk Rock fauna, is that specimens attributable to S. normalis occur with varying forms of S. neptuni, S. branneri and S. hitchinensis. The lesson is that multiplication of zonal or subzonal names based on limited evidence is to be avoided. Acknowledgements I am much indebted to the Royal Society for a grant from the Scientific Investigations Grant-in-aid towards the cost of the present study, particularly for the preparation of illustrations. 326 C. W. WRIGHT I am grateful to Mr R. E. H. Reid who generously presented to me many years ago his admirable col- lection of Chalk Rock ammonites of which many are figured in this paper; also to Dr R. G. Bromley, Mr J. C. Doyle, Mr R. J. Hogg, Mr M. J. Oates, Mr P. R. Payne and Mr A. Wainwright who have given or lent specimens from their collections for study, description or figuring. To Mr A. G. Brighton, formerly of the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge, Dr Colin Forbes of the same institution, Dr M. K. Howarth, Mr D. Phillips and the Keeper of the Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Mr C. J. Wood and the Director, Institute of Geological Sciences, and the Curator of the City Museum, St Albans I am indebted for ready access to material in their charge and for help in various other ways. I have had the benefit of discussion of many of the species here described with Professor T. Matsumoto of Fukuoka. Through Dr W. A. Cobban I have received specimens and plaster casts of North American ammonites in the hands of the United States Geological Survey. All specimens from the C. W. and E. V. Wright collection (including Mr R. E. H. Reid’s ammonites) figured or described here are now in the British Museum (Natural History). The Chalk Rock collection of Mr P. R. Payne and Mr R. J. Hogg and certain of Mr M. J. Oates’ ammonites are now in the Institute of Geological Sciences. The photographs in the first five plates were taken by Mr J. A. Gee and Miss P. R. Martins of Imperial College, London, except where otherwise stated: others are separately acknowledged. References Anderson, F. M. 1902. Cretaceous deposits of the Pacific Coast. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., San Francisco, (3, Geol.) 2 : 1-154, pls 1-12. 1941 (reprinted 1948). Synopsis of the later Mesozoic in California. Jn Jenkins, O.P. (dir.), Geologic formations and economic development of the oil and gas fields of California. Bull. Div. Mines Calif., San Francisco, 118 : 183-186, text-figs. — 1958. Upper Cretaceous of the Pacific Coast. Mem. geol. Soc. Am., Washington, 71. 378 pp., 75 pls. Andert, H. 1934. Die Kreideablagerungen zwischen Elbe und Jeschken. Teil III: Die Fauna der obersten Kreide in Sachsen, BOhmen und Schlesien. Abh. preuss. geol. Landesanst., Berlin, (NF) 159. 477 pp., 19 pls. Barrois, C. 1875. La zone a Belemnites plenus, Etude sur le Cénomanien et le Turonien du bassin de Paris. Annls Soc. géol. N., Lille, 2 : 146-193. Basse de Ménorval, E. 1959. Le Turonien. Jn Basse de Ménorval, E. & Sornay, J., Généralités sur les faunes d’ammonites du Crétacé supérieur francais. C. r. Congr. Socs sav. Paris Sect. Sci., Colloque sur le Crétacé Supérieur Francaise 1959 : 7-26. 1962. Quelques Ammonites nouvelles du Crétacé supérieur d’Angola. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Paris, (7) 4: 871-876, pls 22-24. Billinghurst, S. A. 1927. On some new Ammonoidea from the Chalk Rock. Geol. Mag., London, 64 : 511- 518, pl. 16. Birkelund, T. 1973. A note of Pseudopuzosia sp. from Sardal. In Bergstrém, J., Christensen, W. K., Johansson, C. & Norling, E., An extension of Upper Cretaceous rocks to the Swedish west coast at Sardal. Bull. geol. Soc. Denm., Copenhagen, 22 : 141-2, pl. 12. Chatwin, C. P. & Withers, T. H. 1909. Contribution to the Fauna of the Chalk Rock. Geol. Mag., London, (5) 6 : 66-68, pl. 2. Cobban, W. A. & Scott, G. R. 1972. Stratigraphy and ammonite fauna of the Graneros Shale and Green- horn Limestone near Pueblo, Colorado. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., Washington, 645. 108 pp., 39 pls. Collignon, M. 1931. Faunes Sénoniennes du nord et de l’oust de Madagascar. Annis géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 1. 66 pp., 9 pls. —— 1952. Ammonites néocretacées du Menabe (Madagascar). II - Les Pachydiscidae. Trav. Bur. géol. Madagascar, Tananarive, 41. 114 pp., 33 pls. (Reprinted 1955. Annls géol. Serv. Mines Madagascar, Tananarive, 21. 98 pp., 28 pls.) —— 1965-69. Atlas des fossiles caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites). 12 (Turonien) : iv + 82 pp., pls 37-413 (1965). 15 (Campanien inférieur) : xi+216 pp., pls 514-606 (1969). Service géologique, Tananarive. Crick, G. C. 1910. Note on two Cephalopods [. . .] from the Chalk of Lincolnshire. Geol. Mag., London, (5) 7 : 345-348, pl. 27. Dibley, G. E. 1912. Note on the Chalk Rock in North Kent. Geol. Mag., London, (5) 9 : 372-374. Diener, C. 1925. Ammonoidea neocretacea. Fossilium Catalogus I, Animalia, 29. 244 pp. Berlin. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 327 Drushchitz, V. V., Michailov, N. P. & Eristavi, M. S. 1958. Nadsemejstvo [Superfamily] Desmocera- tacea. In Orlov, Y. A. (ed.), Osnovy Paleontologii [Fundamentals of Palaeontology] 6: 107-112, pls 49-51. Moscow. (Engl. trans. 1976, Jerusalem.) Fritsch (Frié), A. J. 1872. In Fritsch, A. & Schlénbach, U., Cephalopoden der béhmischen Kreideformation. 51 pp., 16 pls. Prague. —— 1877. Studien im Gebiete der BoOhmischen Kreideformation. Die Weissenberger und Malnitzer Schichten. Arch. naturw. Landes Durchforsch. Bohmen, Prague, 4 (1). 153 pp., text-figs. —— 1889-97. Studien im Gebiete der Bohmischen Kreideformation. Palaeontologische Untersuchungen der einzelnen Schichten. [V. Die Teplizer Schichten. Arch. naturw. Landes Durchforsch. Bohmen, Prague, 7 (2). 120 pp. (1889). V. Priesener Schichten. Jbid., 9 (1). 135 pp. (1893). VI. Die Chlomecker Schichten. Ibid., 10 (4). 84 pp. (1897). Geinitz, H. B. 1839-42. Charakteristik der Schichten und Petrefacten des sachsisch-béhmischen Kreidege- birges. 116+xxv pp., 24 pls. (pp. 1-29, pls 1-8, 1839; pp. 31-100, pls 9-16, 1840; pp. 101-116, pls 17-24, 1842). Dresden & Leipzig. —— 1843. Die Versteinerungen von Kieslingswalda und Nachtrag zur Charakteristik des sachsisch-boh- mischen Kreidegebirges. 23 pp., 6 pls. Dresden & Leipzig. — 1845-46. Grundriss der Versteinerungskunde. 813 pp., 27 pls. Dresden & Leipzig. —— 1849-50. Das Quadersandsteingebirge oder Kreidegebirge in Deutschland. 293 pp., 12 pls. Freiberg. — 1871-75. Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 20 (1). 319 pp., 67 pls. Grossouvre, A. de 1894. Recherches sur la Craie supérieure. 2, Paléontologie. Les Ammonites de la Craie supérieure. Mém. Serv. Carte géol. dét. Fr., Paris (1893). 264 pp., 39 pls. Henderson, R. A. 1973. Clarence and Raukumara Series (Albian — ? Santonian) Ammonoidea from New Zealand. J] R. Soc. N.Z., Wellington, 3 : 71-123, text-figs. HouSa, V. 1967. Lewesiceras Spath (Pachydiscidae, Ammonoidea) from the Turonian of Bohemia. Sb. geol. Véd. Praha, P 9. 50 pp., 8 pls. Howarth, M. K. 1965. Cretaceous ammonites and nautiloids from Angola. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., London, (Geol.) 10 : 337-412, 13 pls. Hyatt, A. 1900. Class 5. Cephalopoda. Jn Zittel, K. A. von (ed. & trans. Eastman, C. R. et al.), Textbook of Palaeontology 1 : 502-604. London. Jahn, J. J. 1891. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Fauna der Priesener Schichten der bohmischen Kreide- formation. Jb. k.-k. geol. Reichsanst., Wien 41 : 179-186. —— 1895. Einige Beitrage zur Kenntniss der bohmischen Kreideformation. Jb. k.-k. geol. Reichsanst., Wien 45 : 125-218, pl. 8. Jimbo, K. 1894. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Fauna der Kreideformation von Hokkaido. Palaeont. Abh., Berlin, (NF) 2 : 149-194, pls 17-25. See Matsumoto 1963. Kennedy, W. J. 1971. Cenomanian ammonites from southern England. Spec. Pap. Palaeont., London, 8. 133 pp., 64 pls. —- & Garrison, R. E. 1975. Morphology and genesis of nodular chalks and hardgrounds in the Upper Cretaceous of southern England. Sedimentology, Amsterdam & New York, 22 : 311-386. Kitchin, F. L. 1922. Note on Heteroceras woodsi sp. nov. Appendix I in Sherlock, R. L. & Noble, A. H., Geology of the country round Beaconsfield. Mem. geol. Surv. U.K., London, sheet 255 : 49. Klinger, H. C. 1976. Cretaceous heteromorph ammonites from Zululand. Mem. geol. Surv. Rep. S. Afr., Pretoria, 69. 142 pp., 43 pls. Kossmat, F. 1895-98. Untersuchungen iiber die Siidindische Kreideformation. Beitr. Paldont. Geol. Ost.-Ung., Vienna & Leipzig, 9 (3-4) : 97-203, pls 15-25 (1895); 11 (1) : 1-46, pls 1-8 (1896); 11 (3) : 89- 152, pls 14-19 (1898). Langenhan, A. & Grundey, M. 1891. Das Kieslingswalder Gestein und seine Versteinerungen. Jahresb. Glatzer Gebirgs-Vereins, Breslau, 10. 12 pp., 6 pls. Mantell, G. A. 1822. The fossils of the South Downs; or Illustrations of the geology of Sussex. 327 pp., 43 pls. London. Matsumoto, T. 1954. Family Puzosiidae from Hokkaido and Saghalien. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D5: 69-118, pls 9-23. —— 1959. Upper Cretaceous Ammonites of California, Part II. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D, spec. vol. 1. 172 pp., 41 pls. —— 1963. Part X. Kotora Jimb6é (1894): Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Fauna der Kreideformation von Hokkaid6. In Matsumoto, T. (ed.), A Survey of the Fossils from Japan Illustrated in Classical Mono- graphs (Primarily a Nomenclatorial Revision). Palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 25th Anniversary Volume : 41-48, pls 60-68. 328 C. W. WRIGHT —— 1966. Notes on Ammonites flaccidicosta Romer from the Cretaceous of Texas. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (Ns) 63 : 294-302, pl. 32. —— 1967. Evolution of the Nostoceratidae (Cretaceous Heteromorph Ammonoids). Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D 18 : 331-347, pls 18-19. —— 1971. A Monograph of the Collignoniceratidae from Hokkaido. Part V. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D 21 : 129-162, pls 21-24. —— & Noda, M. 1966. Notes on Ammonites bravaisianus d’Orbigny from the Cretaceous of France. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (Ns) 64 : 359-365, pl. 40. & Obata, I. 1963. A monograph of the Baculitidae from Japan. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D 13: 1-116, pls 1-27. Meek, F. B. 1876. Jn Meek, F. B. & Hayden, F. V., A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the Upper Missouri country. Rep. U.S. geol. geogr. Surv. Terr., Washington, 9. 629 pp., 45 pls. Moreman, W. L. 1927. Fossil Zones of the Eagle Ford of north Texas. J. Paleont., Chicago, 1 : 89-101, pls 13-16. Najdin, D. P. & Shimanskij, V. N. 1959. Cephalopoda. In Moskvin, M. M. (ed.), Atlas verchnemelovoj fauny severnogo Kavkaza i Kryma [Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous fauna of the northern Caucasus and Crimea] : 166-220, 23 pls. Moscow. Noble, A. H. 1911. On a new species of Desmoceras from the Chalk Rock of Buckinghamshire. Geol. Mag., London, (5) 8 : 398-400. Nowak, J. 1908. Untersuchungen iiber Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide in Polen. I. Teil. Genus Baculites Lamarck. Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Lett. Cracovie, Cl. Sci. Math. Nat. 1908 : 326-353, pl. 14. Orbigny, A. d’ 1840-42. Paléontologie francaise. Terrains crétacés. I. [Céphalopodes.] 662 pp., Atlas 148 pls. (pp. 1-120, 1840; 121-430, 1841; 431-662, 1842.) Paris. —— 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés. 1, 1x +394 pp. 2, 428 pp. Paris. Pervinquiére, L. 1910. Sur quelques ammonites du crétacé Algérien. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. Paléont., Paris, 42. 86 pp., 7 pls. (17 (2-3) : f. 8-18, pls 10-16.) Pictet, F.-J. & Campiche, G. 1861-64. Description des fossiles du terrain Crétacé des Environs de Sainte- Croix. Matériaux pour la Paléontologie Suisse, sér. 3e, 2. 752 pp., 98 pls. Geneva. Prescher, H. 1963. Die Scaphiten-Zone und ihre Problematik. Ber. geol. Ges. D.D.R., Berlin, 8 : 171-188, pl. 7. Reuss, A. E. von 1845. Die Versteinerungen der bohmischen Kreideformation, (1) : 1-58, pls 1-13. Stuttgart. Riedel, L. 1931. Zur Stratigraphie und Fasciesbildung im Oberemscher und Untersenon am Siidrande des Beckens von Miinster. Jb. preuss. geol. Landesanst. BergAkad., Berlin, 51 : 605-713, pls 72-79. Roman, F. & Mazeran, P. 1913. Monographie paléontologique de la Faune du Turonien du bassin d’Uchaux et des ses dépendances. Archs Mus. Hist. nat. Lyon, 12 (2) : 1-137, pls 1-11. Romer, C. F. 1870. Geologie von Oberschlesien. 1, xxiv +587 +xxii pp. 2, 50 pls. Maps. Breslau. Romer, F. A. 1841. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges, (2) : iii-iv, 49-145, pls 8-16. Hanover. Schliiter, C. 1871-76. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 21, 24. 264 pp., 55 pls. (21: 1-24, pls 1-8, 1871; 21 : 25-120, pls 9-35, 1872; 24: 121-264, pls 36-55, 1876.) — 1875. Uber die Gattung Turrilites und die Verbreitung ihrer Arten in der mittleren Kreide Deuts- chlands. Sber. niederrhein. Ges., Nat.-u. Heilk., Bonn (in Verh. naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl., Bonn), 32 527-31. Scupin, H. 1907. Die stratigraphischen Beziehungen der obersten Kreideschichten in Sachsen, Schlesien und Bohmen. Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paldont. BeilBd., Stuttgart, 24 : 676-715. —— 1913. Die Lowenberger Kreide und ihre Fauna. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, Suppl. 6 (1-4). 276 pp., 15 pls. Sharpe, D. 1853-57. Description of the Fossil Remains of Mollusca found in the Chalk of England. Cephalopoda. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 68 pp., 27 pls. (pp. 1-26, pls 1-10, 1853; pp. 27— 36, pls 11-16, 1855; pp. 37-68, pls 17-27, 1857.) See Wright & Wright 1951. Shimizu, S. 1932. On a new type of Senonian ammonite, Pseudobarroisiceras nagaoi Shimizu gen. et sp. nov. from Teshio Province, Hokkaido. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., Tokyo, 10: 1-4, 1 pl. —— 1933. Note on two interesting Senonian ammonites from Hokkaid6 and South Saghalin. J. Shanghai Sci. Inst. (11) 1: 11-15, 1 pl. —— 1935. The Upper Cretaceous Cephalopods of Japan, Part I. J. Shanghai Sci. Inst. (11) 1: 159-226, tables. Sornay, J. 1956. Scaphites compressus. Palaeont. univers. (NS) no. 4. AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK 329 —— 1964. Sur un Lewesiceras nouveau du Turonien d’Uchaux (Vaucluse). Annl/s Paléont., Paris, (Ser. Inv.) 50 : 183-187, text-figs. Sowerby, J. de C. 1850. Description of the Shells of the Chalk Formation. Jn Dixon, F., The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex: 346-350, pls 27-29. London. Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian Ammonite Fauna of Pondoland. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr., Cape Town, 10 : 113-147, pls 5-9. 1925. On Upper Albian Ammonoidea from Portuguese East Africa, with an appendix on Upper Cretaceous Ammonites from Maputoland. Ann. Transv. Mus., Pretoria, 11 : 179-200, pls 28-37. 1926. On New Ammonites from the English Chalk. Geol. Mag., London, 63 : 77-83, table. —— 1939-41. Ammonoidea of the Gault. Part 13. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London : 541-608, pls 59-64 (1939). Part 14. Ibid. : 609-668, pls 65-72 (1941). Sturm, F. 1901. Der Sandstein von Kieslingswalde in der Grafschaft Glatz und seine Fauna. Jb. preuss. geol. Landesanst. BergAkad., Berlin, 21 (1900) II, Abhandl. ausserhalb &c. : 39-98, pls 2-11. Tanabe, K. 1975. Functional morphology of Otoscaphites puerculus (Jimbo), an Upper Cretaceous ammonite. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, (Ns) 99 : 109-132, pls 10-11. Wiedmann, J. 1959. Le Crétacé supérieur de l’Espagne et du Portugal et ses Céphalopodes. C. r. Congr. Socs sav. Paris Sect. Sci., Colloque sur le Crétacé Supérieur Francaise 1959 : 709-764, pls 1-8. 1962. Ammoniten aus der Vascogotischen Kreide (Nordspanien) I. Phylloceratina, Lytoceratina. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, A 118 : 119-237, pls 8-14. 1965. Origin, limits, and systematic position of Scaphites. Palaeontology, London, 8 : 397-453, pls 53-60. —— 1969. The heteromorphs and ammonoid extinction. Biol. Rev., Cambridge, 44 : 563-602, pls 1-3. —— 1973. Ancyloceratina (Ammonoidea) at the Jurassic/Cretaceous Boundary. Jn Hallam, A. (ed.), Atlas of Palaeobiogeography : 309-316. Amsterdam, London & New York. Woods, H. 1896. The Mollusca of the Chalk Rock: Part I. Q. JI geol. Soc. Lond. 52: 68-98, pls 2-4. Wright, C. W. 1935. The Chalk Rock fauna in East Yorkshire. Geol. Mag., London, 72 : 441-442. —— 1953. Notes on Cretaceous Ammonites. I. Scaphitidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., London, (12) 6 : 473- 476. —— 1957a. Some Cretaceous Ammonites from New Zealand. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z., Dunedin, 84 : 805-809, pls 54-55. —— 1957b. [Cretaceous Ammonites.] Jn Arkell, W. J., Kummel, B. & Wright, C. W., Mesozoic Ammo- noidea. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology V.:80-490. Kansas. & Matsumoto, T. 1954. Some doubtful Cretaceous Ammonite Genera from Japan and Saghalien. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, D 4 (2) : 107-134, pls 7-8. —— & Wright, E. V. 1945. Notes on some Cretaceous Fossils. Geol. Mag., London, 82 : 126-129, pl. 5. 1951. A survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), London. 40 pp. ‘ Yabe, H. 1910. Die Scaphiten aus der Oberkreide von Hokkaido. Beitr. Palaont. Geol. Ost.-Ung., Vienna & Leipzig, 23 (3) : 159-174, pl. 15. Index New taxonomic names and the page numbers of the principal references are in bold type. An asterisk (*) denotes a figure. Acanthoceras deverianum 324 falcatus 319 Africa 287, 320 Germari 324 Algeria 294, 310 cf. goupilianus 321, 324 Allocrioceras 288, 290-3 Neptuni 319-21, 324 angustum 289*, 290-1, 292 peramplus 310-11, 324-5 annulatum 290-2, 325 prosperianus 310 billinghursti 292, 295* (Desmoceras) Austeni 325 cuvieri 288, 292-3 (Schloenbachia) subtricarinatus 325 aff. ellipticum 290 Ancyloceras cuvieri 292 strangulatum 282, 289*, 291, 292, 295*, 325 lineatum 293 wiltonensis 302 paderbornense 288 woodsi 290 pseudoarmatum 293 Ammonites bladenensis 305-6, 325 Ancylocerataceae 283 bravaisianus 319 Anisoceras 288 cottae 299-300 campichei 290 330 C. W. WRIGHT reidi 282, 288-90, 289* Reussianus 297 saussureanum 288 Anisoceratidae 288, 290 Austiniceras 308 Baculites 286, 287 anceps 285 asper 287 baculoides 285 besairiei 287 bohemicus 285, 325 brevicosta 287 capense 287 faujassi 285 var. bohemica 285 schenki 287 undulatus 283, 286, 287, 289*, 323*, 324-5 vertebralis 287 yokoyamai 287 (Lechites) Bohemicus 285 Baculitidae 283, 285—7 Baculitinae 283 Barroisiceras 318, 321 Barroisiceratinae 318-19, 324 Bedfordshire 303, 307 Berkshire 303-5 Bochianitinae 283 Boehmoceras 290 Bostrychoceras 294 California 287, 310, 318, 320, 325 Campanian 293-4, 296, 303 Canadoceras 311 Cenomanian 282, 284-6, 288-9, 291-2, 294, 298, 305, 307-8, 310 Choffaticeras 324 Christophoceras 293 Cirroceras 294 (Cirroceras) indicum saxonicum 296 Coilopoceras requienianum 324 Collignoniceras cristatum 321 woollgari 300 Collignoniceratidae 318-22 Coniacian 287, 289, 292, 296, 298-300, 302 304-5, 310, 313-14, 316, 318, 324 Crioceras ellipticum 290-1, 325 spinigerum 293 Cyrtochilus bohemicus 285 Czechoslovakia 286, 297, 300, 302, 307, 311, 325 > Deshayesites 306 Desmoceras Austeni 325 marlowense 313-14 Desmoceratidae 308-10 Diaziceras 319 Didymoceras 294-7 indicum 296 nebraskense 294 polyplocum 296 saxonicum 295*, 296-7, 298, 323*, 325 thomasi 294 Diplomoceratidae 283 Diplomoceratinae 284 Eopachydiscus laevicanaliculatum 311 Eubostrychoceras 296 Euhomaloceras incurvatum 287 Euptychoceras 284 Fallotites (Ingridella) malladae 284 France 285, 300, 305, 310, 318, 320, 322, 324 Gaudryceras sp. 325 Gauthiericeras aff. bravaisi 320 Germany 291, 294, 297, 300, 302-3, 307, 321-2 Germariceras germari 324 Hamites 283-4, 298 angustus 290-1 armatus 297 baculoides 285 conradi 325 geinitzii 290 gracilis 324 multinodosus 293 plicatilis 297 reussianus 297 Hamitidae 284-5 Hamitinae 283 Helicoceras annulifer 297 armatus 297 ellipticum 292 polyplocum 325 Reussianum 297 spiniger 325 Hemiptychoceras 284 gaultinum 284 reesidei 284 Hertfordshire 303-5, 307, 313 Heteroceras 296 Reussianum 297, 325 woodsi 296 Holaster planus Zone 282, 286, 291, 296, 298, 300, 303, 307-8, 312-13, 316, 319-21 Hyphantoceras 294, 297-8 flexuosum 298 reflexum 298 reussianum 295*, 297-8, 323*, 324-5 Roissyanum 297 woodsi 296 Hypoturrilites 307 Idiohamites 290 alternatus 290-1 ellipticus 291 India 310, 313, 316 Ingridella malladae 284 AMMONITES OF THE ENGLISH CHALK ROCK Inoceramus labiatus Zone 311 teshioensis 325 Introduction 282 Japan 287, 293, 310, 313, 325 Kensworth 283, 287, 291-3, 303, 305, 307, 310-11, 318, 321-2 Lechites 283, 285 Bohemicus 285 communis 285 Ledoceras 318 massoni 321-2, 324 Lewesiceras 310-13, 316, 324-5 beantalyense 312, 318 cricki 312 lenesicense 310, 312 mantelli 309*, 310-12, 317*, 324-5 masiaposense 312 peramplum 310-11 plicatum 311 romani 310-11, 324 sharpei 311 sornayi 312 tongoboryense 312, 316 woodi 282, 301*, 312-13, 317* Lincolnshire 298, 312, 316 Macroscaphites rochatianus 324 Madagascar 287, 313, 320 Menabonites 310, 312 anapadensis 316 Metaptychoceras 284-5 smithi 284-5, 289* Metoicoceras 285, 291 Micraster cortestudinarium Zone 300 Neocardioceras 291 Neocrioceras 293-4 multinodosum 293 pseudoarmatum 293 sanushibense 293 (Schlueterella) multinodosum 293, 295* pseudoarmatum 293 sanushibense 293 New Zealand 298, 306 Nostoceras 296 Nostoceratidae 283 Nostoceratinae 284, 294-8 Nowakites 311 Oregoniceras 318 Jillsoni 319 normale 321 siskiyouense 319 Otoscaphites 305 arnaudi 307 awanuiensis 306-7 bladenensis 301*, 305-7, 325 cottae 299 fritschi 325 minutus 307 puerculus 307 teshioensis 307 reidi 282, 301*, 306, 307, 323* Otoscaphitinae 298, 305-7 Oxybeloceras petrolense 293 Pachydiscidae 310-18 Pachydiscus anapadensis 312 cricki 310-12 farmeryi 313 peramplus 310, 312, 324 rhodanicus 316, 324 sharpei 310 vaju 310-12, 324 Paratexanites 318 Peroniceras subtricarinatum 325 Phlycticrioceratidae 290 Polyptychoceratinae 283 Prionocyclus hitchinensis 318 Neptuni 319-20 Prionotropis branneri 321 bravaisianus 319, 324 cristatus 321 neptuni 319 Prophlycticrioceras 290 Protexanites 318, 321, 324 Proturrilitoides 294 Pseudojacobites 282, 312-13, 316, 324 ankobensis 314 farmeryi 309*, 313-16, 315*, 317* masiaposensis 314, 316 rotalinus 314, 316 texanus 314, 316 Pseudopuzosia 282, 312-13 marlowensis 313, 316, 318 Pseudoxybeloceras 293-4 Ptychoceras smithi 284 Ptychoceratinae 283 Puzosia 308-10 33] curvatisulcata 282, 308-10, 309*, 323*, 324 orientalis 308 gaudama 308 gaudemarisi 308, 310, 324 intermedia 310 kossmati 310 mulleri 308 orientale (orientalis) 308, 310 kossmati 308 subplanulata 308 Puzosiidae 308 Puzosiinae 308-10 Reed 283, 287, 292, 294 Reesidites 318, 322, 324 minimus 321-2 332 subtuberculatus 321 Romaniceras deverianum 324 Rotalinites 313 Santonian 293, 297-8, 312-13 Scalarites gracilis 324 Scaphites 298-305 aequalis 300, 324 auritus 282, 305, 325 binodosus 303 bladenensis 306 compressus 305 costatus 300 diana 282, 301*, 304-5 equalis 298 turonensis 324 fritschi 282, 306 geinitzii 298-300, 302-3, 305, 324, 325 binodosus 302 geinitzii 300-2, 301*, 323*, 325 intermedius 282, 300, 302, 304, 325 laevior 282, 301*, 302-3, 323*, 325 inflatus 303 kieslingwaldensis 300, 301*, 303—4 lamberti 302-3, 304 doylei 282, 301*, 304, 325 meslei 300, 303-4, 325 planus 303 pseudoaequalis 301*, 305, 323* (Otoscaphites) cottae 299 Scaphitidae 298-307 Scaphitinae 298-305 Schloenbachia knighteni 319 siskiyouensis 319 subtricarinatus 325 Schlueterella 293-4; see Neocrioceras Sciponoceras 285-6, 287 baculoides 285-6 bohemicum 285-6, 287, 289*, 323*, 325 gracile 284-6 C. W. WRIGHT Stomohamites 284 Subprionocyclus 318-22 branneri 315*, 318-19, 320-1, 324 cristatus 321 hitchinensis 315*, 318-19, 320-1, 325 neptuni 315*, 319-20, 321-2, 324-5 normalis 315*, 318-20, 321-2, 323*, 324-5 sp. 315* Sweden 312-13 Terebratulina lata 300, 312 Texanitinae 321, 324 Texas 290, 313 Tongoboryoceras 310, 312, 316-18, 324 beantalyense 312, 318 donovani 318 rhodanicum 316-18, 317*, 324 sornayi 312 tongoboryense 312, 316, 318 Turrilites 284 acutus 285 Astierianus 297 cf. costatus 324 Geinitzii 296-7 polyplocus 296-7 saxonicus 296-7 undulatus 296-7 Turrilitaceae 283-4 Turrilitidae 283-4, 294-8 United States 285, 291, 307 Upper Albian 284-5, 289, 298, 305, 311 Watinoceras 320 coloradoense 284 Worthoceras rochatianum 324 Yezoites planus 299 Yorkshire 283, 291, 298, 311-12 Accepted for publication 26 November 1976 British Museum (Natural History) Monographs & Handbooks The Museum publishes some 10-12 new titles each year on subjects including zoology, botany, palaeontology and mineralogy. Besides being important reference works, many, particularly among the handbooks, are useful for courses and students’ background reading. Lists are available free on request to: Publications Sales British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Standing orders placed by educational institutions earn a discount of 10% off our published price. Titles to be published in Volume 31 Foraminifera of the Togopi Formation, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. By J. E. Whittaker & R. L. Hodgkinson. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The - ammonite family Gaudryceratidae. By W. J. Kennedy &H.C. Klinger. Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. By R. Watkins. The ammonites of the English Chalk Rock (Upper Turonian). By C. W. Wright. The entire Geology series is now available Type set by John Wright & Sons Ltd, Bristol and Printed by Henry Ling Ltd, Dorchester i.) ee ee eS fk 4 toes eky Sakis ncaa = MS ats o ae ioe Hira Aiasire py oie Dp Bt ¢ ‘4 pe if sas fate ene ahah shitty Heese Tice 2