ae , be * yh : ' ¥ He + ‘ . 60h he ; ° on ’ ’ * ‘ ri ; o ‘ ‘ ” ’ ee" ‘ ’ ‘ m ere ’ J’ , / _ . . . % ; ‘ , ‘ ; ; : ’ ori : sou ' “> : ‘ . oy va . ‘ ’ ny ; ; = Ha 9 ‘ ow > * Se wns .” i ew - Ve ‘ 7 > ‘ ’ ‘ : : ‘ . ower , roww 1 sre . ’ rm “ rs | ‘ ° ’ “ : : . . : = . ~ ry ‘ be 4 : " wes . “on *¥ 9 a % , . to bee “ ‘ . oo i ‘ . . =e . y - ae : . Kis ves ‘ tie : - ’ ot he . = renin . * 00 , - , % it ~ ; a " + = na a aa i i» ; : : : pone ’ : “ 00415 3 : bi te : are) e - a > 9: eae ‘ > H . oa ° ° I 4 : . 4 a) * f * 7 “te rf : ; “ wee ‘ eens " ’ . > 4 3 x tes fe . ’ é ’ ’ 2 i “ ; ov y aie , , " ‘ ’ J ww <. , or “ é we . , ‘ . ' Sook ; a 7 wer . “ . c i ’ : : -» : ” ’ 2 : ere on . . o* : * . ’ ° ede ae lee ode why ony ~ 4 : oi ‘ ’ ” ‘ F oe 2 " : > " : = zs J : sen ” ‘ ' 7 ar oe ve oie , . x ve one n i - 4 « a v4 rte - oe. OLNOWOL JO ALISYIAINN AWA! ADO10OZ THE - CAMBRIDGE NATURAL HISTORY : EDITED BY j SF. HARMER, Sc.D., F.R.S., Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge ; Superintendent of the University Museum of Zoology AND A. E. SHIPLEY, M.A., Fellow of Christ’s College, Cambridge ; __ University Lecturer on the Morphology of Invertebrates VOLUME VII == cep, a DEPAR TRENT ar > = Al wr * VT iPx Dy 4V%U Li ts} iT 09 9 STEM: uopuoy wiloa4dv GTHOM HL 40 SAUNIWAS AWOISAHG Was oc 1a awOlHdvH903a9 ze Ge) ‘Salida d AGNV WIGIHdWYW JO NOILNGIYLS Uopuoy Teg : ; 6 mu aa 108. qNG UEz044 Appuauenssod, OW] os ae auoz PePooM apesodusal UsoY}4ION ceceeneeeeee== YOREPBSOA PAAINLEZUIUN snonuiloo YyM 9489404 [eo1dou seserensesttsnt==™ GYBUUBABS 9 SOIdIE4d cenusucesecnesneeenrneseeeeeaeens’ 1999/04] FBT gsow aly JY isoddorg HES P ASSEMI 5 Dae acre vesenard 97JOS9] “Thou Jol 21d 04) ————— | a ~~. 400 AMPHIBIA AND REPTILES By Hans Gapbow, M-A. (Cantab.), Ph.D. (Jena), F.R.S., Strick- land Curator and Lecturer on Advanced Morphology of Vertebrata in the University of Cambridge. London MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY IQOI Ali rights reserved PREFACE LINNAEUS had but a poor opinion of the Amphibia and their describers, or he would not have called the former “ pessima tetraque animala,” nor would he have dismissed the latter with the terse remark: “ Amphibiologi omnium _ paucissimi sunt nullique veri.” That was, however, nearly 150 years ago; and at the present time there are fewer difficulties in writing a book on Amphibia and Reptiles. Those who care for the study of Amphibia and Reptiles —the Herpetologists, to give them their scientific title—have never been numerous ; ‘But most of. them have been serious students. One reason for the fact that this branch of Natural History is not very popular, is a prejudice against creatures some of which are clammy and cold to the touch, and some of which may be poisonous. People who delight in keeping Newts or Frogs, Tortoises or Snakes, are, as a rule, considered eccentric. But in reality these cold-blooded creatures are of fascinating interest provided they are studied properly. The structure of animals is intimately connected with their life-habits ; and this correlation is perhaps more apparent in Amphibia and Reptiles than in any other class. The anatomist who studies internal and external structure is as much struck with the almost endless variety in details as he who takes the trouble to observe the living animal in its native haunts, or at least under conditions not too unnatural. He will agree with VY. von Scheffel’s Toad “that those above seem to have no Vi PREFACE notion of the beauties of the swamp ”—brilliantly coloured Newts engaged in amorous play, concert-giving Frogs, and meta- morphosing Tadpoles. The motto assigned to the Reptiles seems singularly appropriate when we consider that poisonous snakes have been developed from harmless forms, and that many kinds of reptiles have lost limbs, teeth, and eyesight in the process of evolution. The present work is intended to appeal to two kinds of readers — to the field-naturalist, who, while interested in life- histories, habits, and geographical distribution, beauty or strange- ness of forms, is indifferent to the homologies of the metasternum or similar questions ;—and to the morphologist, who in his turn is liable to forget that his specimens were once alive. A great portion of the book is anatomical and systematic. It was necessary to treat anatomy, especially that of the skeleton, somewhat fully, since it has long been recognised that it is impossible to base a_ scientific classification upon external characters. The reader familiar with Vertebrate anatomy has a right to expect that questions of special morphological interest will be dwelt upon at length. Those who have no anatomical foundation must be referred to one of the now numerous intro- ductory manuals on the subject. The account of the Amphibia is more complete than that of the Reptilia. It was possible to diagnose practically all the recent genera; and this has been especially done in the Anura, in order to show how in an otherwise very homogeneous group almost any part of the body, internal or external, can be modified in kaleidoscopic variety. The same could not be done with the teptilia. Their principal groups,—called sub-classes in the present work, in order to emphasise their taxonomic importance in comparison with the main groups of Birds and Mammals, — differ so much from each other that it was decided to refrain PREFACE Vii from attempting a general account of them. Moreover, the number of species of recent lizards and snakes is so bewilder- ing, the genera of many families being but tedious variations of the same theme, that only those forms have been described which are the most important, the most striking, or which the traveller is most likely to come across. The student who wishes to go farther into systematic details must consult the seven volumes of the Catalogue of Reptiles in the British Museum (London, 1889-1896). Mr. G. A. Boulenger, the author of this magnificent series, has rendered the systematic treatment of recent Amphibia and Reptiles an easy task. During many years of the most friendly intercourse I have profited on count- less occasions by his ever-ready advice. Although he has kindly read the proofs of the part dealing with the Amphibia it would be unfair to associate him with any of its short- comings or with contestable opinions, for which I alone am responsible. Cope’s large work on the Crocodilians, Lizards, and Snakes of North America (Rep. U.S. Nat. Mus. for 1898 (1900)) has unfortunately appeared too late to be used in the present work. The drawings on wood were, with few exceptions, made by Miss M. E. Durham, mostly from living specimens—a procedure which has to a great extent determined the selection of the illustrations. Since both the metric and the English systems of measure- ments have been employed, it may be well to state for the convenience of the reader that the length of a line of the text is four inches or approximately ten centimeters. I have frequently and freely quoted accounts of previous authors instead of paraphrasing them. Especial thanks are due to Messrs. Longmans, Green, and Co., and to Messrs. Murray, vill PREFACE for their courteous permission to make several long quotations from Sir J. E. Tennent’s Ceylon, and from H. W. Bates’ Naturalist on the River Amazons. Lastly, a remark about my Editors. Instead of being a source of annoyance they have rendered me the greatest help. H. GADOW. CAMBRIDGE, December 19, 1900. "CON TEN T'S PAGE PREFACE : A : , Ween). : : P s E Vv SCHEME OF THE CLASSIFICATION ADOPTED IN THIS Book ; : : : x1 PAK. 1: AMPHIBIA (CHEVAGE IEE CHARACTERS AND DEFINITION—POSITION OF THE CLASS AMPHIBIA IN THE PHYLUM VERTEBRATA—HISYroRICAL ACCOUNT OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF AMPHIBIA j P 5 : ; P : : : : ; 3 CiRTEAGE TRV Ey ll SKELETON oF URODELA AND ANURA—SKIN—COLOUR-CHANGING MECHANISM— PorIsoN-GLANDS—SPINAL NERVES—RESPIRATORY ORGANS—SUPPRESSION or LuNGsS—URINO-GENITAL ORGANS—FECUNDATION—NuURSING HABITS —DEVELOPMENT AND METAMORPHOSIS . : A : 3 ; ; 141 CHAP hk, 11 NEOTENY—REGENERATION—TEMPERATURE—GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION . 63 (COEGAUE IE Rae av) STEGOCEPHALI OR LABYRINTHODONTS—LISSAMPHIBIA—APODA > : ; 78 (CHEPACE AWB Re av) LISSAMPHIBIA (CONTINUED)—URODELA . A : 2 : ; . 94 CHAPTER VI LisSAMPHIBIA (CONTINUED)—ANURA : : : : ; . y alets! x CONTENTS PART. IL* REPPTIUTA CHAPTER VII . PAGE DEFINITION AND CHARACTERS—POSITION OF THE CLAss REPTILIA IN THE PHyLuM VERTEBRATA—CLASSIFICATION—SKULL AND VERTEBRAE . : 2g OuisbeCeM LT Daee Aah EL PROREPTILIA—-PROSAURIA—-LTHEROMORPHA . ‘ : : ‘ . . “285 CHAPTER 1X CHELONIA—ATHECAE—THECOPHORA : 7 ‘ 5 - 3 > wile CESARE RY Xt DtxosatRIAa—CROcoDILIA. : ‘ 2 : . . ; é - 412 COEDASP ABR: sacl PLESIOSAURIA—ICHTHYOSAURIA—PTEROSAURIA—PYTHONOMORPHA : = PAYS CUE ASP MBE ol SAURIA—AUTOSAURI OR LACERTILIA—LIZARDS.. : : ; , - 491 CHAPTER SAURIA (CONTINUED)—OPHIDIA—SNAKES ; ; : : : : . 681 INDEX 3 : ; : : ; ; ; : ‘ - 651 SCHEME OF THE CLASSIFICATION ADOPTED Sub-Class. STEGOCE- PHALI (p. 78) LISSAM- PHIBIA (p. 84) : IN THIS BOOK CLASS AMPHIBIA. Sub-Family. Desmognathinae (p. 102). Plethodontinae ( p. 103). Amblystomatinae (p. 109). Salamandrinae (p. 115). t { Amphignathodontinae (p. 188). Hylinae (p. 189). Hemiphractinae (p. 210). Order. Sub-Order. Family. Stegoce- Br ae phali Lepo- | SAURI (p. 80). spondyli AISTOPODES (p. 80) | (p. 81). Stegoce- phali Temno- spondyli (p. 81) Stegoce- phali Stereo- spondyli (p. 83) ( Apoda CoECILIIDAE(p.89). (p- 84) ( AMPHIUMIDAE (p. 97). Urodela SALAMANDRIDAE ( (p. 94) (p. 102) ie PROTEIDAE (p. 182). SIRENIDAE (p. 136). a 8) (p. 148). : ( DIScOGLOSSIDAE (p. 152). PELOBATIDAE (p. 160). BUFONIDAE (p. 166). Sees J PHaNERo- HyYLIpAE (p. 185) I GLOSSA (p.- 152) CysTIGNATHIDAE { (p. 209) (p. 2 225) \ RANIDAE (p. 237) \ ENGY aie ATIDAE { Cystignathinae (p. 211). Dendrophryniscinae (p. 224). Engystomatinae (p. 225). Dyscophinae (p. 235). | Genyophryninae (} (p. 236). ’ Ceratobatrachinae (p. 237). Raninae (p. 238). | Dendrobatinae (272 Xil SCHEME OF CLASSIFICATION CLASS REPTILIA (p. 277). PROREPTILIA (p. 285). Sub-Class. PROSAURIA | Order. Eryops (p. 286). Cricotus (jp. 287). Sub-Order Family. Microsauri (}). 288). f PROTOROSAURI (p. 290). | RH¥YNCHOCEPHALI (p. 292). Atari - Prosauri (p. 288) | (p. 290) * Pareiasauri (j). 304). Seen Theriodontia (p. 306). Anomodontia (}. 309). (p. 300) | Placodontia (p. 311). Atheca (p. 333 CHELONIA TESTUDINIDAE (p. 345). p-. 312) | CHELONIDAE (p. 378). igre a \e Ste : PELOMEDUSIDAE (p. 390). faced ra ee - CHELYDIDAE (p. 399). Per | CARETTOCHELYDIDAE (p. 404). TRIONYCHOIDEA TRIONYCHIDAE (p. 404 . (p. 404). , Sauropoda (p. 418). Theropoda (p. 420). ferent on DINOSAURIA i (p. 425). p- 412) Orthopoda | ORNITHOPODA (p. 424) (p. 426) Ceratopsia (p. 430). ( Pseudosuchia (p. 452). Parasuchia (}). 433). ( TELEOSAURIDAE (p. 450). METRIORHYNCHIDAE (p. 451). eta q MACRORHYNCHIDAE (p. 451). ae Eusuchia(p. 434). : .4 GAVIALIDAE (p. 451)._- ATOPOSAURIDAE (p. 453). GONIOPHOLIDAE (p. 453). CROCODILIDAE (p. 454). Nothosauri f MEsosaURIDAE (p. 476). PLESIO- (p. 476) " \ NoTHOSAURIDAE (p. 477). SAURIA 5 ‘ - PLIOSAURIDAE (p. 477). (p. 473) | Be a . + PLESIOSAURIDAE (p. 478). as rey | ELASMOSAURIDAE (p. 478). ICHTHYO- : SAURIA perragArtg (p. 478 ES ern ’ PrERODACTYLI er a Pterosauri | (p. 486). = (p. 486) PTERANODONTES p. 404 | (p. 487). Dolichosauri Halhiedia (p. 489). MORPHA = Mosasauri (p. 487 (p. 489). SPHARGIDAE (p. 333). CHELYDRIDAE (p. 338). DERMATEMYDIDAE (p. 341). CRYPTODIRA CINOSTERNIDAE (p. 342). (p. 338) | PLATYSTERNIDAE (p. 345). SCHEME OF CLASSIFICATION Xili Sub-Class. Order. Sub-Order. Family. Sub-Family. (ceaneanae p- 507). GECKONES GECKONIDAE Eublepharinae (p. 502) (p. 507) | (peralaye Uroplatinae (p. 512). (etcanm, AE (p. 515). IGUANIDAE (p. 528). XENOSAURIDAE (p. 536). ZONURIDAE (p. 536). ANGUIDAE (p. 537). HELODERMATIDAE (p. 540). Lacertilia LANTHANOTIDAE (p. 541). (p. 491) VARANIDAE (p. 542). -1 LACERTAE 4 XANTUSIIDAE (p. 547). (p. 513) TEJIDAE (p. 547). . LACERTIDAE (p. 549). GERRHOSAURIDAE (p. 559). SCINCIDAE (p. 559). ANELYTROPIDAE (p. 564). DIBAMIDAE (p. 564). ANIELLIDAE (p. 564). AMPHISBAENIDAE (p. 565). ( PYGOPODIDAE (p. 567). | CHAMAELEON- [{ SAURIA TES (p. 567) | (p. 491) TYPHLOPIDAE (p. 593). GLAUCONTIDAE (p. 594). ILYSIIDAE (p. 594). UROPELTIDAE (p. 595). { Pythoninae (p. 598). ee 596), ieee (p. 601). XENOPELTIDAE (p. 605). CHAMAELEONTIDAE (p. 573). Acrochordinae ; (p. 606). ame Agly ey 4 fettativistas (p. 607). 2 (p-'606) Rhachiodontinae S Le tp. 622). ae ¥ Dipsadomorphinae Ophidia 4 = F tes 623). tp: DE) Sata Opistho- Elachistodontinae 5) oly phe 1 Ge 625). = ep: 623) Homalopsinae = (p. o & | Protero- { Elapinae (p. 626 glypha Hydrophinae. (p. 625) (p. 635). AMBLYCE- PHALIDAE (p. 637). -— VIPERIDAE { Viperinae (p. 638). (p. 637) | Crotalinae (p. 644). >| ees BAL 2), 1 AP LB VOR Vititl £ e - ¥ ““"s scheint, dass die hier oben keine Ahnung haben von dem Sumpf und Seiner Pracht.”__ The ‘‘ plattgedriickte Krote,” yi ScHEFFEL’s T’rompeter von Sakkingen. = = CHAPTER I AMPHIBIA CHARACTERS AND DEFINITION——POSITION OF THE CLASS AMPHIBIA IN THE PHYLUM VERTEBRATA——HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF AMPHIBIA A BirpD is known by its feathers, a Beast by its hairs, a Fish by its fins, but there is no such obvious feature which characterises the Amphibia and the Reptiles. In fact, they are neither fish, flesh, nor fowl. This ill-defined position is indicated by the want of vernacular names for these two classes, a deficiency which apples not only to the English language. All the creatures in question are backboned, creeping animals. Those which are covered with horny scales, and which from their birth breathe by lungs only, as Crocodiles, Tortoises, Lizards, and Snakes, are the Reptiles. The rest, for stance, Newts or Efts, Frogs and Toads, are the Amphibia. Their skin is mostly smooth and clammy and devoid of scales; the young are different from the adult in so far as they breathe by gills and live in the water, before they are transformed into entirely lung-breathing, terres- trial creatures. But there are many exceptions. yoteus and Siren the mud-eel, always retaim their gills; while not a few frogs undergo their metamorphosis within the egg, and never breathe by gills. If we add the tropical limbless, burrowing Coecilians, and last, not least, the Labyrinthodonts and other fossil forms, the proper definition of the class Amphibia,—in other words, the reasons for grouping them together into one class, separated from the other backboned animals.—requires the examination of many other characters. 4 AMPHIBIA CHAP. So far as numbers of living species are concerned, the Amphibia are the least numerous of the Vertebrata. There are about 40 limbless, burrowing APpopA; 100 URopELA or tailed two- or four-footed newts, and about 900 ANuRA, or tailless, four-footed frogs and toads; in all some 1000 different species. Few, indeed, in comparison with the 2700 Mammals, 3500 Reptiles, nearly 8000 Fishes, and almost 10,000 Birds. But we shall see that the Amphibia have not only “had their day,” having flourished in bygone ages when they divided the world, so far as Vertebrata were concerned, between themselves and the Fishes, but that they never attained a dominant position. Inter- mediate between the aquatic Fishes and the gradually rising terres- trial Reptiles they had to fight, so to speak, with a double front during the struggle of evolution, until by now most of them have become extinct. The rest persist literally in nooks and corners of the teeming world, and only the Frogs and Toads, the more recent branch of the Amphibian tree, have spread over the whole - globe, exhibiting almost endless variations of the same narrow, much specialised plan. The greatest charm of the Anura lies in their marvellous adaptation to prevailing circumstances; and the nursing habits of some kinds read almost lke fairy-tales. Characters of the Amphibia.' The vertebrae are (a) acentrous, (6) pseudocentrous, or (c) notocentrous. The skull articulates with the atlas by two condyles which are formed by the lateral occipitals. For exceptions see p. 78. - 3. There is an auditory columellar apparatus, fitting into the fenestra ovalis. 4. The limbs are of the tetrapodous, pentadactyle type. 5. The red blood-corpuscles are nucleated, biconvex, and oval. 6. The heart is (a) divided into two atria and one ventricle, and (h) it has a conus provided with valves. The aortic arches are strictly symmetrical. 8. Gills are present at least during some early stages of development. 9. The kidneys are provided with persistent nephrostomes. 10. Lateral sense-organs are present at least during the larval stage. 11. The vagus is the last cranial nerve. 12, The median fins, where present, are not supported by spinal skeletal rays 13. Sternal ribs and a costal or true sternum are absent. 14. There is no paired or unpaired medio-ventral, copulatory apparatus. 15. Development takes place without amnion and allantois, None of these characters is absolutely diagnostic, except 1 (c), and this aonb only to the Anura and most of the Stegocephali. _ bo References to explanations of the terms used below will be found in the index. I CHARACTERS AND POSITION wn Numbers 1 (0), 1 (¢), 2, 3, 4 and 12 separate the Amphibia from the Fishes. Numbers 1, 6 (6), 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15 separate them from the Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals. Number 2 separates them from the Fishes, Reptiles, and Birds. Number 5 separates them from the Mammals. Number 6 (a) separates them from the Fishes (excel. Dipnoi), Birds and Mammals. We can, therefore, very easily define all the Amphibia, both recent and extinct, by a combination of the characters enumerated above. For instance, by the combination of numbers 2, 3 or 4 with either 7, 8, 9, 11, 13 or 15. Amphicondylous Anamnia would be an absolutely correct and all-sufficient diagnosis, but it would be of little use in the deter- mination of adult specimens; and the tetrapodous character is of no avail for Apoda. Amphicondylous animals without an intra- eranial hypoglossal nerve is a more practical diagnosis. In the case of living Urodela and Anura the absence of any scales in the skin affords a more popular character; it is unfor- tunately not applicable to the Apoda, many of which possess dermal scales, although these are hidden in the imbricating transverse rings of the epidermis; and the frequent occurrence of typical scales of both ecto- and meso-dermal composition in many of the Stegocephali forces us to discard the scales, or rather their absence, as a diagnostic character of the class Amphibia. The same applies to the mostly soft, moist, or clammy, and very glan- dular nature of the skin. The position of the class Amphibia in the Phylum Verte- brata.—There is no doubt that the Amphibia have sprung from fish-like ancestors, and that they in turn have given rise to the Reptilia. The Amphibia consequently hold a very important intermediate position. It was perhaps not a fortunate innova- tion when Huxley brigaded them with the Fishes as /ehthyopsida, thereby separating them more from the Sauropsida ( = Reptilia and Aves), than is justifiable——perhaps more than he himself intended. The connecting-link, in any case, is formed by the Stegocephali ; all the recent Orders, the Apoda, Urodela, and Anura, are far too specialised to have any claims to the direct ancestral connections. The line leading from Stegocephali to fossil Reptiles, notably to such Proreptilia as Zryops and Cricotus, and even to the Lepospondylous Prosauria, is extremely gradual, and the steps are almost imperceptible. Naturally, AMPHIBIA CHAP. 6 en. ; assuming evolution to be true, there must have lived countless creatures which were a “rudis indigestaque moles,” neither Amphibia nor Reptilia, in the present intensified sense of the systematist. The same consideration applies equally to the line which leads downwards to the Fishes. But the great gulf within the Vertebrata lies between Fishes and Amphibia, between absolutely aquatic creatures with internal gills and “ fins,” and terrestrial, tetrapodous creatures, with lungs and fingers and toes. On the side of the fishes only the Dipnoi and the Crosso- pterygii come into consideration. The piscine descent of the Amphibia is still proclaimed by the following features——(1) The possession by the heart of a long conus arteriosus, provided with, in many cases, numerous valves, or at least (Anura) one series at the base, another at the beginning of the truncus where the arterial arches branch off: (2) the strictly symmetrical arrangement of these arches; (5) the trilocular heart is still like that of the Lung-fishes or Dipnoi ; (+) the occurrence of as many as four or even five branchial skeletal arches in the larval stage; (5) the glottis is supported by cartilages which themselves are derivatives of posterior visceral arches ; (6) the development of the vertebrae (Stegocephali and Urodela) from four pairs of arcualia, and the formation of the intervertebral joints by a split across the intervertebral ring of cartilage: this feature is unknown in Reptilia, but it occurs also in Lepidosteus, most probably also in Polypterus ; (7) the hypo- glossal still retains the character of a post-cranial or cervical spinal nerve; (8) the presence of lateral sense-organs; (9) the possession of external gills is of somewhat doubtful phylogenetic value, although such gills occur amongst fishes only in Dipnoi and Crossopterygi. It is not unlikely that in the Amphibia these organs owe their origin to entirely larval requirements, while the suctorial mouth of the larvae of the Anura and many fishes has certainly no ancestral meaning, but is a case of con- vergent development. The usual diagnoses of the Amphibia contain the statement that they, or most of them, undergo a metamorphosis, or pass through a larval stage. The same applies to various fishes; while, on the other hand, the larval (not ancestral) stage has become permanent in the Proteidae and Sirenidae ; and lastly, we cannot well speak of larvae in the viviparous Sa/amandra atra. I CLASSIFICATION 7 The evolution of an adequate classification of the Amphibia has been a long process. Even their recognition as a class, separate from, and of equal rank with that of, the Reptilia, was by no means generally accepted until comparatively recent times. A historical sketch of the laborious, often painful, striving for light, in France and Germany, then in England, and lastly in America, is not without interest. The term Amphibia was invented by Linnaeus for the third class of animals in his famous “Systema Naturae.” It comprises a very queer assembly, which, even in the 13th edition (1767), stands as follows :— 1. REPTILES PEDATI, with the four “genera” Testudo, Draco, Lacerta, and Rana. Lacerta includes Crocodiles, Lizards, and Newts ! 2. SERPENTES APODES. 3. NANTES PINNATI. Elasmobranchs, Sturgeons, Lamipreys, and various other fishes. Laurenti, 1768, in a dissertation entitled “Specimen medicum, exhibens Synopsin Reptilium . . .,” uses Brisson’s term, REPTILES, and divides them into :— REPTILIA SALIENTIA, these are the Anura. GRADIENTIA, namely the Urodela and Lizards. SERPENTIA, the Snakes and the Apoda. Brongniart, 1800, “ Essay d’une classification naturelle des Reptiles,” ! dis- tinguishes :— CHELONI, SAuRII, OPHIDII, BATRACHIT; the last for the Frogs, Toads, and Newts. Latreille, 1804, “ Nouveau Dict. Hist. Nat.” xxiv.,? accepts the four Orders of Brongniart’s “ Reptiles,’ but clearly separates the fourth Order, “BatrRacuil,” from the rest by the following, now time-honoured, diagnosis: Doigts des pattes n’ayant pas dongles; des branchies, du moins pendant un temps; des metamorphoses. But there is not one word about “ Amphibia” in opposition to “ Reptilia.” Duméril, 1806, “ Zoologie analytique” (p. 90), and “Elémens de histoire naturelle,” 1807, divides the “ Reptiles batraciens,” or “‘ Batracii,” into Ecaupatr and Caupatri; he also introduces the terms “ ANOURES” and “ URoDELES” as their equivalents ; but since these terms appear in the French form purists do not admit their having any claim to recognition ! Oppel, 1811, “Die Ordnungen, Familien und Gattungen der Reptilien,” establishes the term Apopa for the Coeciliae, and recognises their affinity to the Ecaudata and Caudata by removing them from the Snakes. De Blainville, 1816, “Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution du regne animal ” ?— AMPHIBIENS SQUAMIFERES. [The Reptilia. | ‘ NUDIPELLIFERES s. Ichthyoides. [The Amphibia. ] 1 Bull. Soc. Philom. ii. p. 81. 2 Tableaux méthodiques, p. 61. 3 Bull. Soc. Philom. p. 113. 8: AMPHIBIA CHAP. Merrem, 1820, “ Tentamen systematis Amphibiorum.” PHoutpota. [The Reptilia.] Batracuia: APODA. SALIENTLIA. Mutabilia [with metamorphosis, «4g. GRADIENTIA) , New] abs Fak si “| Amphipneusta [Perennibranchiate Uro- deles. ] F. S. Leuckart, 1821, “ Einiges ueber die fischartigen Amphibien.” ! Monopnoa. [The Reptilia.] hie temporary gills: Ecaudata + Caudata pt. with permanent gills: “ Proteidae,” Meno- poma and Amphiwma. Latreille, 1825, “ Familles naturelles du regne animal.” The Vertebrata are divided into Haematherma and Haemacryma. These terms for warm- and cold-blooded creatures were later on amended by Owen to Haemato- therma and Haematocrya. The latter are divided by Latreille as Dienoa. [The Amphibia] follows :— Reptinia. Still including the Coeciliae amongst the Snakes. { Caducibranchiata. AMPHIBIA - ; : \ Perennibranchiata. PISCEs. Wagler, 1830, “ Systema Amphibiorum.” TESTUDINES, CrocopiLi, LACERTAE, SERPENTES, ANGUES, COECILIAE, RaANAE, [CHTHYODI. RanaE I. AGLOSSA. eS Il PHANEROGLOSSA: 1. Cauda nulla. [The Anura.] - E 2. Cauda distincta. [The Sala- mandridae. } IcHtHyopI |. ABRANCHIALES. Menopoma — [Cryptobranchus| and Amphiuma. . Il. BRANCHIALES. [The Perennibranchiate Urodela. | J. Muller, 1831, “ Beitrage zur Anatomie ... der Amphibien.” ? GYMNOPHIONA, DEROTREMATA, PROTEIDAE, SALAMANDRINA, Bar- RACHIA. J. Bell, 1836, Todd’s “Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology,” Art. * Amphibia.” AMPHIPNEUSTA, the Perennibranchiate Urodeles; ANouRA, URODELA ; ABRANCHIA, Menopoma and Amphiuma ; Apopa. Stannius, 1856, “Handbuch der Zootomie: Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.” (2nd ed.) AmpHrpia Monopnoa. The Reptilia. Ampxipia Dipnoa. 1. Uropeta. PERENNIBRANCHIATA, DEROTREMATA: Amphiuma and Menopoma. MYCTODERA.* 1 Isis, 1821. ; * Treviranus’ Zeitschr, f. Physiol. 1831, p. 190. * dépn, neck ; uw, close. I CLASSIFICATION 9 2. BarracHia. AGLOSSA. PHANEROGLOSSA : Systomata = Engystomatidae. Bufoninae. Without manubrium sterni. Raninae. With manubrium. Hyloidea. With adhesive finger- discs, GYMNOPHIONA. Gegenbaur, 1859, “ Grundziige der vergleichenden Anatomie.” AMPHIBIA as a separate class, equivalent to that of the Reprita, are divided into the four Orders: PERENNIBRANCHIATA, SALA- MANDRINA, BATRACHIA, and GYMNOPHIONA. In the second edition of the “Grundziige” (1870) they are divided into URODELA, ANURA, and GYMNOPHIONA. Huxley, 1864, “The Elements of Comparative Anatomy.” MAMMALS. SAUROIDS, subsequently changed into Sauropsrpa = Reptilia + Aves. ICHTHYOIDS, 5 = IcHtTHYoPsIpDA = Amphibia + Pisces. Haeckel, 1866, “‘ Generelle Morphologie.” Amphibia. A. PHRACTAMPHIBIA s. Ganocephala = Labyrinthodonta + Peromela [ Apoda]. B. LissAMpHIBIA s. Sozobranchia = Sozura [Urodela] + Anura. Cope, 1869.! STEGOCEPHALI, GYMNOPHIDIA, URopELA, PROTEIDEA, TRACHYSTOMATA, ANURA. Huxley, 1871, “A Manual of the Anatomy of Vertebrated Animals.” Amphibia I. SavRopatracutia [v.d. Hoeven’s term] s. URoprna 1. Proteidea. 2. Salamandridae. II, LaBYRINTHODONTA. III. GymMNopHiona. IV. BatTRAcHIA s. ANURA. Boulenger, 1882, ‘ Catalogue of the BarRACHIA GRADIENTIA s. CaupaTa and BatTRAcHIA Apopa,” divides the Caudata simply into; SALAMAND- RIDAE, AMPHIUMIDAE, PROTEIDAE, and SIRENIDAE. 1882, “Cat. Batrachia Salientia s. Ecaudata,” see p. 140. Cope, 1890, “Synopsis of the Families of Vertebrata.” ~ CLAss BATRACHIA. Sub-Class I. StTEGOCEPHALL Order 1. Ganocephali: Trimerorhachis, Archegosaurus. 2. Rhachitomi: Eryops . Embolomeri: Cricotus. . Microsauri: Branchiosaurus, Hylonomus, ete. if 1 Proc. Ae. Philad. ». 209. 2 Americ. Natural. xxiii. p. 849. ye) 10 AMPHIBIA CHAP. I Sub-Class II. URopE.a. Order 1. Proteidae: Proteus. 2. Pseudosauria. [All the rest of the Urodela + Coeciliidae. ] 3. Trachystomata: Sirenidae. III, SALrenTrIA. P. and F. Sarasin, 1890, “Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ceylonesischen Blindwiihle, Ichthyophis glutinosa.” ! Sub-Class I. ARCHAEOBATRACHI 8. STEGOCEPHALI. I]. NEOBATRACHI. Order 1. URODELA. a, Salamandroidea. [The Urodela.] b. Coeciloidea = Amphiumidae + Coeciliidae. 2. ANURA. The classification adopted in this volume is as follows :-— CLAss AMPHIBIA. Sub-Class I. Phractamphibia. Order I. Stegocephali Lepospondyl. Sub-order 1. Branchiosauri. Sub-order 2. Aistopodes. Order II. Stegocephali Temnospondyli. Order III, Stegocephali Stereospondyli. Sub-Class II. Lissamphibia. Order I. Apoda. Order II. Urodela. Order III. Anura. Sub-order 1. Aglossa. Sub-order 2. Phaneroglossa. 1 Sarasins’ Ergebnisse . . . Ceylon, 1887-1890. CHAPTER SKELETON OF URODELA AND ANURA——SKIN—COLOUR -CHANGING MECHANISM— POISON -GLANDS——SPINAL TORY ORGANS—SUPPRESSION OF LUNGS ,UNDATION — NURSING ORGANS AND METAMORPHOSIS SKELETON OF THE URODELA The vertebral column.—The number of vertebrae is smallest in the terrestrial, greatest in the entirely aquatic forms, and is excep- tionally large in the eel-shaped Amphiuma. I] NERVES— RESPIRA- URINO -GENITAL HABITS— DEVELOPMENT In the following table the sacral vertebra is included in those of the trunk. Trunk. Siren lacertina . 2 ae Necturus maculatus. ae rD Proteus anguinus 3 30 Or yptobranchus ie ea waenes: sis 20 or 21 C. scheuchzerv ‘ ; OPA C. japonicus é : . 22 Amphiuma means — . a) (ie Amblystoma tigrinum . dla ar: 16 Salamandra maculosa . ee ky Triton cristatus . F ee Triton taeniatus . é eels orale Triton palmatus . : ie Salamandrina perspicillata ’. 15 Spelerpes fuscus . é pan au The vertebrae of the Urodela and those of the Apoda differ from those of all the other Tetrapoda’ by possessing no special centra or bodies. That part which should correspond with the centrum is formed either by the meeting and subsequent complete co-ossification of the two chief dorsal and ventral pairs of arcualia Tail. 3D + 29 28 + 24 + 22 to 26 35 + 32 + Dit 36 36 + 23 to 25 32 to 42 23 1 Credner’s term for all Vertebrates higher than fishes. 12 URODELA CHAP. (tail-vertebrae), or entirely by the pair of chief dorsal arcualia. There is consequently no neuro-central suture. Moreover, the central region of each vertebra is strongly pinched in laterally, widening towards the ends. Another feature of the vertebral column of the Urodela is the possession of a considerable amount of intervertebral cartilage, by which the successive vertebrae are held together. This cartilage does not ossify, and it either remains continuous, serving in its entirety and owing to its flexibility as a joint, or it becomes more or less imperfectly separated into a cup and ball portion, the cup belonging to the posterior end of the vertebra. Such joints are called opisthocoelous, and occur in the Desmognathinae and Salamandrinae. In the adult the cup and ball frequently calcify, and the chorda dorsalis or notochord is completely destroyed. Those vertebrae between which the inter- vertebral cartilage remains unbroken, are called amphicoelous, since in them, most obviously in macerated or dried skeletons, the vertebrae appear hollowed out at either end. In such amphicoelous vertebrae a considerable amount of the chorda always remains, running in an unbroken string through the whole length of the vertebral column. Towards adult life the chorda becomes constricted, and is ultimately squeezed out or destroyed, in the middle of the vertebra, by the invasion of cartilage from the chief arcualia. This intravertebrally situated cartilage has been described erroneously as chordal cartilage. The development of the vertebrae proceeds as follows. First appear a pair of basidorsalia and a pair of basiventralia (Fig. 1, 1, B.D, B.V), blocks of cartilage, imbedded in and resting upon the thin sheath of the chorda dorsalis. Next appears a pair of inter- dorsal blocks, immediately behind the basidorsals ; and somewhat later appears a pair of interventral blocks. These four pairs of cartilages or “arcualia ” each meet, above or below the chorda, and form semi-rings, Which again by extending upwards or downwards fuse into complete rings, in such a way that the interdorsal and interventral elements form the intervertebral mass spoken of above. The basidorsals fuse with the basiventrals, and form the body of the vertebra, the fusion being effected chiefly by the calcification and ossification of the lateral connecting portion of the skeleto- genous layer. The basidorsalia form the neural arches with their unpaired short spinous or neural, and the paired anterior and posterior zygapophysial processes. Concerning the basi- - VERTEBRAL COLUMN 13 ventrala we have to distinguish between the trunk and the tail. In the latter they produce a pair of ventral outgrowths or haemapophyses, which ultimately enclose the caudal blood-vessels. In the trunk the basiventral blocks of cartilage are suppressed ; they appear in the early larvae, but disappear during or even before metamorphosis. Towards the end of the tail the vertebrae diminish in size, and their constituent cartilages assume a more and more Fic. 1.—1-5, Five successive stages of the development of a caudal vertebra of a newt; 6-7, the second and the first cervical ver- tebra of Cryptobranchus ; 8-9. side view of the constituent cartilaginous blocks of a caudal vertebra (8) and a trunk-ver- tebra (9) of Archegosaurus .as typical examples of Temno- spondylous quadripartite and tripartite vertebrae. The cross- hatched parts indicate the artic- wlar facets for the ribs. The anterior end of all the vertebrae looks towards the right side. af, In 7, articulating facet for the occipital condyle ; B.D, basi- dorsal piece or neural arch; BL.V, basiventral piece or ven- tral arch ; Ch, chorda dorsalis, or notochord ; 7. D, interdorsal piece ; 7.7, interventral piece ; I.V.L, intervertebral ligament ; NV, spinal nerve—these are num- bered I, II, III in 6 and7; R, rib; 7, in 7, rib-like tubercle on the first vertebra. indifferent shape, until they become confluent into a continuous rod of cartilage, resembling in this respect the Dipnoi and Holocephali. A periodical revival of this rod, at least of its connective tissue, appears in the tail-filament of the male 7’riton palmatus during the breeding-season. The first vertebra, called the atlas, because it carries the head, is remarkable for the possession of an odontoid process. The latter is formed by a pair of cartilages and represents part of a vertebra, the dorsal portion of which seems to .have been added to the occipital part of the cranium. 14 URODELA CHAP. All the trunk-vertebrae, with the exception of the atlas, carry ribs, at least vestiges thereof. Owing to the early dis- appearance of the basiventral cartilages the capitular portions of the ribs are much reduced, and are mostly represented by strands of connective tissue only. The ribs develop therefore occasion- ally at some distance from the vertebral column, and that por- tion of the rib which in the metamorphosed young newt looks like the capitulum is to a great extent really its tuberculum. Fic. 2.—Transverse section through a Witness the position of the ver- =r aie og o = oil i aad tebral artery, which still indi- mandra maculosa, enlarged. eright side shows the actually existing state, cates the true foramen trans- mis on the ltt ide them and versarium. ‘The homologies of bable original condition. A, Verte- these parts are still more ob- bral artery within the tus trensvers seared by the fact that a new cartilage ; Ch, chorda dorsalis; Sp.c, process grows out from the rib, spinal canal; *, the false transverse by which the latter ware aiaeee canal. i 8 support upon a knob of the neural arch. Thus an additional foramen is formed, sometimes confounded with the true transverse canal. The meaning which underlies all these modifications is the broadening of the body, the ribs shifting their originally more ventral support towards the dorsal side. The whole process is intensified in the Anura ; it is an initial stage of the notocentrous type of vertebrae. The transverse ossified processes of the adult are often much longer than the vestiges of the ribs themselves, and are somewhat com- plicated structures. They are composed first of the rib-bearing cartilaginous outgrowths of the neural arches ; secondly, of a broad string of connective tissue which extends from the ventro-lateral corner of the perichordal skeletogenous layer to the ribs. The shoulder-girdle is extremely simple. It remains almost entirely cartilaginous, and the three constituent elements are not separated by sutures. Ossification is restricted to the base of the shaft of the scapula, and may extend thence over the glenoid cavity. The coracoids are broad, loosely overlap each other, and are “tenon and mortised” into the triangular or lozenge-shaped II LIMB-GIRDLES aL cartilaginous sternum, which latter has no connection with the ribs. The precoracoid is a large, flat process, directed forwards, not meeting its fellow; it is absent in Siren. The humerus articulates with both radius and ulna, and these two bones of the forearm remain separate. The elements which compose the wrist and hand exhibit an almost ideally simple arrangement, slightly varied by the frequent fusion of two or more neighbouring carpalia into one, and by the reduction of the number of fingers. Most frequently the intermedium and the ulnar carpal element fuse together, and there is more often one centrale instead of two. The wrist and hand of the Urodela represent, however, no longer the entirely primitive pentadactyle type, owing to the loss of one finger together with its metacarpal and carpal element. Comparison with the Anura makes it probable that the Urodela have lost the pollex, their four fingers being consequently the 2nd, 5rd, 4th, and 5th. Siren has four or three fingers ; Proteus has only three fingers and three large compound carpal cartilages. In Amphiuma, with either three or two fingers, the ulnare, intermedium, and carpale are fused together, the radiale with the neighbouring carpale. The number of phalanges in the four-fingered species is generally 2, 3, 3, 2 respectively. The pelvic girdle —The ilium stands vertically to the vertebral axis, slanting slightly forwards and downwards. It is attached by means of a rib to only one vertebra, and this ilio-sacral connection is acetabular in its position, ze. it lies in the same transverse plane with the acetabulum, in other words vertically above it. The ventral portion of the pelvis is formed by one large continuous mass, the united pubo-ischia, the anterior or pubic portion of which extends forwards in the shape of a broad triangle (Nectwrus) or as a slender, stalked, Y-shaped cartilage, the epipubis, which is often movably jointed at its base. “The lateral portion of the pubic cartilage is always perforated by the nervus obturatorius. Ossification is restricted to the ischium and to the middle of the shaft of the ium. The acetabular fossa for the femur is closed. The tibia and fibula remain separate. The foot is still more primitive than the anterior extremity, as the majority of Urodela possess the full complement of five toes, with 2, 2, 3, 3, 2 phalanges respectively. Concrescence of the tarsalia applies most frequently to the fourth and fifth distal 16 URODELA CHAP. and to the two centralia; exceptional, for instance, in Crypto- branchus japonicus, are as many as three centralia, but this is an individual, even a one-sided variation, as shown for instance by a specimen in the Cambridge Museum. Loss of the fifth toe occurs sporadically in genera of different groups, namely, in Salamandrella, Batrachyperus, Salamandrina, Necturus, Manculus, Batrachoseps. In Amphiuma the number is reduced to three or two; in Proteus to two; and in Siren the hind limbs, with their girdle, are altogether absent. Lastly, in some species of Spelerpes and Batrachoseps both fore and hind limbs have become so small as to be practically without function, parallel cases being found among various Scincidae and other Lizards. The hyoid apparatus is still very primitive in many, especially in larval, Urodela. Besides the hyoid there are as many as four pairs of branchial arches, which, however, decrease in size and completeness, so that the last two have lost their connection with the median copular piece, and become attached in various ways to the second branchial arch. This is the arrangement apparently in all larvae, but four pairs of branchials persist in the adult Siren, Amphiuma, and Cryptobranchus alleghaniensis. The whole branchial apparatus is reduced to three pairs of arches in Necturus and Proteus, to two in the adult Crypto- branchus japonicus and in the Salamandridae. Of considerable interest is the vestige of a fifth pair of arches in the larvae of Triton and Salamandra, in the shape of a pair of tiny cartilages, which lie in front and on each side of the opening of the trachea, and give rise to the formation of the laryngeal cartilages, better developed in the higher Vertebrata. The following are noteworthy characters of the skull of Urodela. The articulation of the skull with the vertebral column is not always effected entirely by-the two condyles of the lateral occipital bones, but the median basal cartilage often possesses a pair of facets for the odontoid-like process of the first vertebra ; such additional facets are perhaps best developed in Crypto- branchus and in the Salamandrinae. The middle portion of the primitive cranium, from the exit of the optic nerve to the ethmoid cartilage, is formed by a pair of separate bones, the orbito-sphenoids. The parietal and frontal bones remain separate. One or more periotic bones exist, besides the prootic, in the aquatic families. 1 SKULL, 17 A pair of prefrontal bones is present in most Salamandridae, e.g. Salamandra, Triton, Amblystoma, especially in the larva, and in Cryptobranchus; these bones are absent in Amphiuma, Necturus, Proteus, and Siren. The lacrymalia are still separate im some Amblystomatinae, Pm Fic. 3.—Skulls of various Urodela. 1, Salamandra ma- culosa, ventral view, and 2, dorsal view ; 3, Axolotl stage of Amblystoma ; 4, adult stage of Amblystoma ; 5, Salamandrina perspicillata (after Wieders- heim); 6, Salamandra ma- culosa, dorsal view of the lower jaw. A, Articulare; Ci, Cy, outer and inner occipital con- dyles ; Ch, choana or posterior nasal opening ; d, dentary ; £, ethmoid; FF, frontal; ZO, lateral occipital ; J7, maxillary ; iV, nasal ; Vo,nostril ; OS, orbito- sphenoid ; P, parietal ; Pf, pre- frontal ; P/, palatine; Pm, pre- maxillary ; Po, prootic; PS, parasphenoid; Pt, pterygoid; Q, quadrate ; S, angulo-splenial ; Sq, squamosal ; Sf, stapes; Vo, vomer ; II, VII, X, exits of the optic, facial, and glosso-vagus nerves. eg. Ranidens and Hynobius. A pair of nasalia are generally present, but are absent in Necturus, Proteus, and Siren. The parasphenoid is furnished with teeth in the Plethodontinae and Desmognathinae. Separate palatine bones exist in WVectwrus and Proteus, and in the larva of Amblystoma, but in the adult form they fuse with the vomers, producing the vomero-palatines characteristic of the majority of Urodela. VOL. VIII C 18 ANURA CHAP. The pterygoid bones are most fully developed, so as to reach the vomero-palatines, in the Amblystomatinae, in ecturus, and in Proteus; they are reduced, so as to leave a gap, in Crypto- branchus, and still more in the Salamandrinae; they are absent in Amphiuma and in Siren. The quadrates are directed forwards in Necturus, Proteus, and Siren, while in the other Urodela they extend transversely and almost horizontally. The hyomandibular remnant, the so-called operculum, is small, and forms a plate which fits into the fenestra ovalis, extending as a ligamentous process upon the quadrate. The quadrato-jugal elements are reduced to ligaments. In many Salamandrinae the large orbito-temporal space is divided into an orbital and a temporal fossa by an arch which is formed by the meeting of two corresponding processes from the squamosal and frontal bones respectively. This bridge is rarely bony (Salamandrina, Triton), mostly ligamentous :—apparently a reminiscence of the Stegocephalous condition. The two pre- maxillary bones are liable to fuse into one, for instance in Cryptobranchus, generally in adult Tritons. They are most reduced, and are toothless, in Siren. The two maxillary bones are absent only in NVecturus, Proteus, Typhlomolge, and Siren. Their posterior end is frequently free, loosely connected by ligaments with the pterygoid in Crypto- branchus ; or with the distal portion of the quadrate, and in this case either just touching it (7'ylototriton), or forming a broad junction (Pachytriton). Each half of the lower jaw consists of a dentary, articular and angulo-splenial. The splenial remains as a_ separate element in Siren ; in others only during the larval period. There are no mento-Meckelian elements. SKELETON OF THE ANURA The vertebral column.—The distinctive peculiarities of the vertebrae of the Anura are that they are notocentrous, and that about a dozen of them are modified and fused into an os coceygeum. The whole column is the most specialised found in the Vertebrata; and various stages are rapidly hurried through and obscured caenogenetically during the embryonic development. Paired cartilages appear on the dorsal side of the thin chordal sheath, and whilst tending to enclose the spinal cord in a Il THE DEVELOPING VERTEBRAL COLUMN 19 canal, their bases grow head- and tail-wards into what will ultimately become the intervertebral region. This extension of cartilage leads to a fusion with that of the next following pair of arches, so that the axial column at this early stage consists of a right and left longitudinal ridge of cartilage which sends oft dorsal processes, neural arches, in metameric succession. Next, the intervertebral cartilage increases in such a way as_ to constrict the chorda either laterally (Rana) or obliquely from above downwards and inwards (Bufo, Hyla). We recognise in this cartilage the interdorsalia. Ventral arcualia are late and much obscured. There is scarcely any cartilage which could represent the interventralia, the intervertebral cartilage being almost entirely made up of the interdorsalia. These fuse together and form a disc or nodule, which later fuses either with the vertebra in front, and in this case fits into a cup carried by the vertebra next behind. (procoelous vertebrae), or the knob is added to the front end of the vertebra, fitting into a cup formed by the tail end of the vertebra next in front (opisthocoelous vertebrae). Much later than the two longitudinal dorsal bands there appears on the ventral side an unpaired band in which appear metamerically repeated swellings of cartilage, lkewise unpaired. These swellings become confluent, in a way similar to that which produced the dorsal bands, and form the unpaired ventral band of*cartilage, the hypochordal cartilage of some authors. The swellings in this band, equivalent to the basi- ventralia, become semilunar in a transverse view, their horns tending upwards towards the basidorsal cartilages, but there is no actual meeting. Both dorsal and ventral elements are, however, joined together and form the chief portion of the ver- tebrae, owing to the rapidly proceeding calcification and later ossification of the all-surrounding “membrana reuniens” or skeletogenous layer so far as that is not cartilaginous. Procoelous vertebrae exist in the overwhelming majority of Anura ; opisthocoelous are those of the Aglossa, the Discoglossidae, and of some Pelobatidae. The systematic value of this pro- or opistho-coelous character has been much exaggerated. We have seen that the centra of the vertebrae of the Anura are formed entirely by the interdorsal elements, hence the term “notocentrous,’ and these centra sometimes remain in adult specimens of Pelobates as separately ossified and calcified pieces, 20 ANURA CHAP. not fused with the rest of the vertebrae. This important dis- covery has been made by Boulenger, but Stannius had previously mentioned a specimen of Pelobates in which the second and fourth vertebrae are biconvex, the third, sixth, and eighth bicon- cave. Moreover, since the sacral vertebra, generally the ninth, in all the Anura is invariably biconvex, the eighth being biconcave in the procoelous families, opisthocoelous like the remaining seven vertebrae in the other families, it is not difficult to imagine that in the Anura the production of pro- or opistho-coelous vertebrae depends simply upon the centra or articulating knobs happening to fuse either with the hind or the front end of the vertebrae. This must of course ultimately be determined by a mechanical problem of motion. A second type of the vertebrae amongst the Anura is the epichordal type, an exaggeration in degree of the notocentrous tendencies of the more usual perichordal arrangement. It shows, namely, the almost complete suppression of all the ventral cartilaginous elements, so that the chorda remains for a long time on the ventral surface of the axial column in the shape of a flattened longitudinal band. These two types are not un- connected. The suppression of the ventral elements applies most typically to the trunk region, while hypochordal cartilage exists 1n the anterior cervical vertebrae, and above all in the coccyx. Typically epichordal are the vertebrae of Pipa, Xeno- pus, Bombinator, Pelobates, Discoglossus and Alytes. Tt is significant that the epichordal often coincide with opisthocoelous vertebrae, and still more suggestive is the fact that Aombinator is eminently aquatic, Pipa and Xenopus entirely so, having lost the tympanum, at least externally. The epichordal feature is not necessarily indicative of relationship. It has probably been developed independently in various groups, in correlation with a resumption of aquatic life. Various genera of Pelobatidae and inost likely some Cystignathidae, e.g. Psewdis, will not improbably connect the two types and their several correlated features, for instance, the frequent reduction of the tympanic cavity. The os coccygeum has retained rather primitive features im so far as much dorsal and ventral cartilage is developed ; but this has almost entirely lost its metameric arrangement, and the posterior half of the coceyx is formed chiefly by the ventral mass of cartilage, while the dorsal elements are more or less reduced. U VERTEBRAL COLUMN 27 Only two vertebrae, generally the tenth and eleventh of the whole column, are clearly visible, each being composed of a pair of dorsal and a pair of ventral cartilaginous blocks. The sacral vertebra articulates with the coccyx by one or two convexities, but in the Aglossa, in some Pelobatidae, and a few others, the coccyx is fused with the sacral vertebra. Beyond the first and second component vertebrae of the embryonic coccyx, the cartilage is continued in the shape of two dorsal, and one ventral, bands, which soon fuse with each other. Dorsally this cartilage © surrounds the spinal cord; the latter degenerates towards the end of the tadpole-stage, leaving, however, the empty spinal canal. The chorda, completely surrounded by cartilage, persists into the post-larval stage, but is destroyed long before the creature attains maturity. Ultimately the whole coccyx ossities. The tail proper, namely that portion which is absorbed during the metamorphosis, remains throughout its existence in an apparently primitive condition. The chorda dorsalis and the spinal cord extend through its whole length, surrounded hy continuous connective tissue without any cartilage; in fact it represents a piece of typical vertebral column before the appear- ance of cartilage. The reduction of this swimming organ begins at the hind end. The vertebral column of the adult.—tThe first vertebra (we will call it the atlas since it carries the skull) is not, as in the Urodela, provided with an odontoid process. It articulates by two cups with the condyles of the occiput. In some Anura it co-ossifies, rather incompletely, with the second vertebra, regularly in the fossil Palaeobatrachus, often in Ceratophrys, Previceps, and occasionally in Pelobates, Bufo, Rana, and Lenopus. This is, however, no justification for looking upon the first vertebra as a complex of two vertebrae, although the atlas is frequently very thick and broad, and even carries, in the Aglossa, considerable lateral wings or diapophyses. Those of the trunk-vertebrae are often very long, acting thereby as substitutes for ribs which are absent, except on the second, third, and fourth vertebrae of the Discoglossidae, and on the second and third of the Aglossa. In the adult Aglossa these ribs fuse with the processes which carry them. . The diapophyses of the sacral vertebra carry no ribs, the ilia being attached to them directly. They are either cylindrical 2D ANURA CHAP. as in the Ranidae and Cystignathidae, or they are more or less dilated as in all the other families, most strongly in the Pelobatidae and the Aglossa. In some members of the large sub-family of the Cystignathidae the otherwise cylindrical diapophyses are slightly dilated. The sacrum is formed by the ninth vertebra, but there are a few interesting exceptions. Pelobates, Pipa, and Hymenochirus possess two sacral vertebrae; and, neglecting individual abnor- malities, these three genera form the only exception amongst recent Amphibia. In the three genera the coccyx is fused with the second sacral vertebra, and such a fusion occurs elsewhere normally only in Bombinator with its single sacral vertebra. The morphologically oldest condition is normally represented by Pelobates, the sacral vertebrae being the tenth and ninth. One Fic. 4.—Dorsal view of the sacral or ninth vertebra (9), with the attachment of the ilium, of (1) Rana temporaria, (2) Bufo vulgaris, showing the whole coceyx and pelvis, (3) Pelobates fuscus, as examples of cylindrical and of dilated sacral diapophyses. (About nat. size.) a, Acetabulum ; ¢, coccyx ; 7, ilium ; z, anterior zygapophyses. case has been recorded by Boulenger of Bombinator pachypus “with eleven segments,’ the last carrying the ium. Individual lop-sided abnormalities have been described in Bombinator and Alytes, where the right ilium articulated with the tenth, the left ilium with the ninth vertebra. This shifting forwards of the ilimin to the extent of one metamere has been continued further in Pipa, in which the sacrum is formed by the ninth and eighth vertebrae, their diapophyses fusing on either side into extra broad wing-like expansions. In old specimens of Palacobatrachus fritschi the seventh vertebra is in a transitional condition, the ilium being carried by the ninth and eighth, and slightly also by the diapophyses of the seventh vertebra; and in P. diluvianus the II VERTEBRAL COLUMN 23 diapophyses of all these vertebrae are united into one broad plate to which the ilia are attached. Lastly, in Hymenochirus the first sacral is the sixth vertebra, and this creature has thereby reduced the pre-sacral vertebrae to the smallest number known. This shifting forwards of the iliac attachment implies the conversion of original trunk into sacral vertebrae, and the original sacral vertebra itself becomes ultimately added to the urostyle. The second sacral, the tenth of Pelobates, the ninth of Pipa, and the tenth on the right side of the abnormal Bombinator, are still in a transitional stage of conversion. In Discoglossidae the tenth is already a typical post-sacral vertebra, and is added to the coccyx, but it still retains distinct, though short, diapophyses. In the majority of the Anura the tenth vertebra has lost these processes, and its once separate nature is visible in young specimens only. In Bombinator even the eleventh vertebra is free during the larval stage. In fact the whole coccyx is the result of the fusion of about twelve or more vertebrae, which from behind forwards have lost their in- dividuality. We conclude that originally, in the early Anura, there was no coccyx, and that the ilium was attached much farther back; and this condition, and the gradual shifting for- wards, supply an intelligible cause of the formation of an os coceygeum. The fact that the sacral vertebrae of the Anura possess no traceS of ribs as carriers of the ilia, is also very suggestive. The ila have shifted into a region, the vertebrae of which had already lost their ribs. By reconstructing the vertebral column of the Anura, by dissolving the coccyx into about a dozen vertebrae, so that originally, say the twenty-first vertebra carried the ilia, we bridge over the enormous gap which exists between the Anura and Urodela. That whole portion of the axial continuation behind the coccyx, more or less coinciding with the position of the vent, is the transitional tail. The disappearance of both notochord and spinal cord, and the conversion of the cartilaginous elements into a continuous rod in the case of the os coccygeum, find an analogy in the hinder portion of the tail of Dipnoi and Crossopterygii, and in the tail-end of most Urodela, portions which are not homologous with the os coceygeum. The term urostyle should be restricted to such and similar modifications of the tail-end, and this latter happens to be lost by the Anura during metamorphosis. 24 ANURA CHAP. Strictly speaking, or rather in anatomical parlance, the Vertebrate tail begins with the first post-sacral vertebra. In the Anura that portion of the whole tail has retained most cartilage, and has become the coccygeum, which is required as a “backbone” for the often enormous belly. This require- ment is an outcome of the great shortening of the trunk proper (if the trunk be defined as ending with the pelvic region), and this shortening of the trunk is again intimately connected with the jumping mechanism, enlargement of the hind-limbs, elongation of the ilia, and throwing the fulcral attachment forwards as much as possible. The pre-acetabular ilio-sacral connection is carried to the extreme in the Anura. The shoulder-girdle and “sternum” are more complete than ‘in the Urodela, there being also a pair of clavicles, fused with the precoracoidal bars. The whole apparatus presents two types. In the arciferous type the coracoids and precoracoids retain a great amount of cartilage in their distal portions, and these cartilages (the epicoracoids of some authors) overlap each other movably on one another, the right usually lying ventrally upon the left. The epicoracoidal cartilage of each side, by connecting the distal end of the coracoid with the precoracoid of the same side, forms. an arc, hence “arciferous.” In the firmisternal type the epicoracoidal cartilages are much reduced, and, instead of overlapping, meet in the middle line and often fuse with each other, forming thereby a firm median bar, which connects the ventral ends of the precoracoids with those of the coracoids. This type is morphologically the higher and more recent, and passes in the larval stage through the arciferous condition. It is restricted to the Ranidae, Engystomatinae, and Aglossa. Although these two types afford an excellent distinctive char- acter for the main divisions of the Anura, they are to a certain - extent connected by intermediate forms in such a way, that, for instance, in Bufo and among Cystignathidae in Ceratophrys, the two opposite epicoracoidal cartilages begin to unite at the anterior end. In many Engystomatinae the precoracoids together with the clavicles are much reduced, sometimes to thin ligaments, being in this case mostly curved back and lying closely against the coracoids; or they may,be lost completely. Very rarely the precoracoidal bars are actually much stronger than the coracoids, ll SHOULDER-GIRDLE 2\5 and the median symphysial bar of cartilage is lost; this is the case In Hemisus. The scapula is always large and curved into transverse, dorsally broadening blades, the dorsal greater portion of which, the so-called supra-scapula, does not ossify but calcifies. It is very doubtful if the Anura possess a true sternum, if by sternum we understand a medio-ventral apparatus which owes its origin to the ventral portions of ribs. The so-called PG. 5.—Ventral views of the shoulder-girdles of various Anura. (Slightly enlarged.) 1, Lombinator igneus, and 2, Bufo vulgaris, as examples of the arciferous type ; 3, adult, 4, metamorphosing Ranw temporaria, showing change from the arciferous into the firmisternal type ; 5, Hemisus guttatum ; 6, Breviceps gibbosus ; 7, Cacopus systoma. (5, 6, 7, after Boulenger.) Cartilaginous parts are dotted ; ossified parts are left white. C/, Clavicle ; Co, coracoid ; /, epicoracoidal cartilage ; 17, humerus ; /, metasternum ; QO, omosternum; /, precoracoid ; Se, scapula; S.S, supra- seapula, sternal apparatus of the Anura consists of two pieces. One, anterior, variously named episternum, presternum, or omosternum, rests upon the united precoracoids and extends headwards, being either styliform or broadened out. Sometimes it is partly ossified, with a distinct suture at its base; this is the case especially in the Firmisternia; in many Arcifera the omosternuim remains cartilaginous and is continuous, without a sutural break, with the cartilage of the precoracoids, indicating thereby its genetic relation to the shoulder-girdle. Hence omosternum is the 26 ANURA CHAP. preferable name. It is frequently much reduced, even absent, for instance in most Bufonidae and in the Engystomatinae. The posterior so-called sternal part may be termed metasternum. It forms. the posterior counterpart of the omosternum. It is attached behind to the epicoracoidal cartilages, or fusing with them forms their posterior continuation. It appears mostly in the shape of a style, which is frequently ossified, and broadens out behind into a cartilaginous, partly calcified blade.. In the Discoglossidae only it diverges backwards into two horns, assuming a striking resemblance to the typical xiphisternum of the Amniota. In young Anura the metasternal cartilage is intimately connected with the pericardium, an indication of its being derived not from ribs but from the shoulder-girdle. The glenoid cavity is always formed by the coracoids and by the scapula, but the precoracoid often takes part in its forma- tion, for instance in Bufonidae, Hylidae, and Discoglossidae. In the fore-limb the humerus has a crest, stronger in the males than in the females; it assumes extraordinary strength in some Cystignathidae, notably in the male Leptodactylus. Radius and ulna are fused into one bone. The carpalia are originally nine in number: radiale, ulnare, two centralia, and five carpalia distalia, the fifth of which is reduced to a tiny nodule or to a ligamentous vestige. The primitive condition still prevails in the Disco- glossidae. In most of the other Anura the fourth and third distal carpalia, in any case very small, fuse with the enlarged ulnar centrale; the radial centrale comes, in the Bufonidae and Pelobatidae, into contact with the radius, so that the forearm articulates with three elements as in the Urodela, but with this difference, that the intermedium of the Urodela has been lost by the Anura. There are five metacarpalia and five fingers, but the elements of the first or thumb are nearly vestigial, so that the pollux is reduced to one or two nodules, scarcely visible externally. The normal number of the phalanges of the second to fifth fingers is 2, 2,4, 3. The distal phalanges are generally straight, either pointed or expanded or with Y or T-shaped ends; but in the Hylidae, in Hylambates amongst the Ranidae, and in Ceratohyla, one of the Hemiphractinae, the terminal phalanges are produced into curved claws which support the adhesive finger-discs. There are, however, many genera of different families, which possess finger-discs and have no claw-shaped “ PELVIC GIRDLE ay phalanges. The Hylidae, and many of the climbing members of the Ranidae with adhesive discs, possess an extra skeletal piece intercalated between the last and last but one phalanges of the fingers and toes. This piece, a mere interarticular cartilage in Hyla, is in the following Raninae* developed into an additional phalanx, so that their numbers are 3, 3, 4, 4 in the hand and 3, 3,4, 5,4 in the foot: Cassinu, Hylambates, Rappia, Mega- lizalus, Rhacophorus, Chiromantis, Izalus, and Nyctiaalus. All the other Ranidae are without this additional phalanx, irrespec- tive of the presence or absence or size of digital expansions.’ The pelvic girdle looks like a pair of tongs (see Fig. 4, p. 22). The ilum is enormously elongated and is movably attached to the sacral diapophyses. This connection is always pre-acetabular in position. The ilium and ischium co-ossify com- pletely, and make up nearly the whole of the pelvis: the pubis is very small, and remains cartilaginous unless it calcifies. It rarely possesses a centre of ossification, for imstance in Pelobates, where the osseous nodule is excluded from the acetabulum, recalling certain Labyrinthodonta, whose ossa pubis likewise do not reach that cavity. The latter is open or perforated in young Anura and remains so in the Discoglossidae, but im the others it becomes closed up as in the Urodela. The ventral halves of the pelvis, besides forming a symphysis, closely approach each other, just leaving room for the passage of the rectum and the urimo-genital ducts. The hind-limbs are in all cases longer than the fore-linbs. The femur is slender, the tibia and fibula are fused into one bone. The tarsus is much modified by the great elongation of the two proximal tarsalia (there being no intermedium) into an astragalus and a calcaneum, both of which fuse together distally and proximally, or completely as in Pelodytes ; in the latter case the limb assumes a unique appearance, since it consists of three successive and apparently single bars of nearly equal length. The other tarsal elements, especially the more lateral ones, are practically reduced to pads. The Anura have thereby acquired two well-marked joints, one cruro-tarsal, the other tarso- metatarsal; this shows a high stage of specialisation in com- parison with the Urodelous and Stegocephalous type of still undefined joints. 1 Boulenger, P.Z.S. 1888, p 204. 28 ANURA CHAP. The Anura possesses five well-developed toes with normally 2, 2, 3, 4, and 3 phalanges, and the rudiments of a sixth digit, the so-called prehallux, which consists of from two to four pieces, including the one which represents its metatarsal. This prehallux, as a vestige of a once better developed digit, is exactly like the elements on the radial side of the wrist, which, we are certain, are the remnants of a once complete finger, namely the pollex. The only weighty difficulty against its interpreta- tion as a prehallux lies in the fact that hitherto no six-toed Stegocephali have been found; but the fact that there are no Stegocephali known with more than four fingers could be used as an argument against there being a pollex-vestige in recent Anura with just as little reason. The skull of the Anura differs from that of the other recent Amphibia in the following features :-— , The orbital region of the primitive cranium remains carti- laginous, but further forward the cranial cavity is closed by the unpaired sphenethmoid, which forms a ring round the anterior portion of the brain-cavity, hence called “os en ceinture” by some anatomists. The frontals and parietals fuse into one pair of fronto-parietal bones, and these again can fuse together in the middle line ; as in Aglossa and Pe/obates. The palatal portion of the palato-quadrate cartilage is complete, reaching forwards to the sides of the ethmoid region. The curved arch, formed by this cartilage, is covered by the following bones: (1) the quadrato- jugal, reduced to a thin splint which connects the quadrate and squamosal with the posterior end of the maxilla; (2) the ptery- goid, always strong, extending from the distal inner corner of the quadrate to the maxilla, sometimes also to the palatine, and with a broad, inedian process to the parasphenoid, this process covering ventrally most of the otic region; (3) the palatines,. which vary considerably in shape and size; they are placed transversely and meet in the middle line: in Bombinator and Pelodytes they are absent. The quadrates are directed transversely and backwards, in conformity with the wide gape of the mouth. The squamosal is always well developed, covering the whole of the quadrate on its outer side; it has a forwardly directed process which ends freely in Rana, meets a corresponding process of the maxilla and forms a bony arch with it im Discoglossus, Pelobates, and others, or II SELON EE: 29 is scarcely developed at all, for instance in Bufo. In Pelobates cultripes the squamosal is very wide and forms a junction with the fronto-parietals, thus producing a broad bridge across the temporal fossa. The nasal bones are large and meet in the middle line. Frequently they leave a space between them and the diverging anterior portion of the fronto-parietals, through which gap appears part of the dorsal surface of the ethmoid cartilage. A fontanelle between the’ frontals occurs in most Hylidae, many Cystignathidae, some few Bufonidae, in Pelodytes amongst the Pelobatidae, and in the Discoglossidae. The tympanic cavity is bordered in front, above, and below by the squamosal and quadrate, behind by the musculus depressor mandibulae, internally by the otic capsule, and by the cartilage of the cranium between this and the lateral occipital bone. The cavity communicates, however, by the wide and _ short Eustachian tube with the mouth, the passage beimg bordered anteriorly by the pterygoid, posteriorly by soft parts. Partly imbedded in these soft tissues is the styloid process or stylohyal, which is attached to the cranium, mostly behind the otic region, and is continued downwards into the anterior horn of the hyoid. The whole partly cartilaginous, ligamentous, and osseous string is, in fact, the entire ventral half of the hyoid arch, while the dorsal half or hyomandibular portion of this, the second visceral arch, is modified into the columellar or auditory chain. The inner end of this chain, the stapes, is inserted into and around the fenestra ovalis of the otic capsule, while the outer end is somewhat T-shaped, and is loosely attached to or near the upper rim of the tympanic ring and to the middle of the tympanic disc. In many Anura this terminal bar can be seen from the outside. The middle portion of the columellar chain is ossified, the rest remains cartilaginous. But the whole chain exhibits various modifications in different genera, especially in the number and the extent of the processes sent out by the outer cartilaginous portion; these are attached in various ways to the tympanum and its rims. The tympanic disc is carried by a cartilaginous ring, which rests against a special process sent out by the quadrate, and is probably itself a differentiation of this element. In some very aquatic genera the whole tympanic cavity is 30 ANURA CHAP. much reduced, for instance in Pelobates, Bombinator, Liopelma. In Batrachophrynus not only the cavity, but also the Eustachian tubes are suppressed. In the Aglossa only the two tubes are united into one short but wide median canal, opening at the level of the pterygoids on the roof of the mouth. The lower jaw is remarkable for the possession of mento- Meckelian cartilages, absent only in the Aglossa and Disco- glossidae. At first they are much longer than the rest of the jaw; during the larval life they indeed form the functional jaw, and they are now covered with horny sheaths instead of teeth. Owing to the absence of teeth on them, these mento- Meckelian cartilages are later not invested by bone, although in many Anura they ultimately ossify, either retaining their sepa- rate nature or fusing partly with the dentary bones. The bulk of the lower jaw, the Meckelian cartilage, becomes invested by the dentary, a small articulare, and an inner angulare, while a splenial element is absent. The dentary itself is mostly reduced to a small dentigerous splint, while the angulare forms by far the greater part of the bony jaw. Teeth are more restricted in their occurrence than in the Urodela. On the jaws they always stand in one row. With the exception of the Hemiphractinae, Amphignathodontinae, Ceratobatrachinae, and Genyophryninae, no recent Anura carry teeth on the lower jaw, and even in these genera they are mostly much reduced in size and firmness, having all the appearance of vanishing structures. The premaxillae and maxillae are frequently furnished with teeth, except in the Dendrobatinae, Genyophry- ninae, Engystomatinae, Dendrophryniscinae, Bufonidae, Pipa, and Hymenochirus. The vomers mostly carry a series of teeth on their posterior border; when these teeth are absent, as in many species of Bufo, a kind of substitute sometimes occurs on the. palatines in the shape of a row of tuberosities. The palatines carry teeth in Hemiphractinae. The parasphenoids are toothed in Triprion and Diaglena, and occasionally in Pelobates cultripes. A few Anura possess peculiar substitutes for teeth in the anterior portion of the lower jaw, namely, a pair of conical bony processes, sometimes rather long, but always covered by the dense guins, or investment of the jaws; e.g. Lepidobatrachus, several Rana, e.g. R. adspersa, R. khasianu, Rk. kuhli, and Cryptotis brevis. 1I SKIN 31 Cranial dermal ossifications are developed in some species of Bufo, still more in the Hemiphractinae, and above all in /Pelo- bates cultripes and in the Cystignathoid genus Calyptocephalus. The hyoid apparatus of the Anura is complicated. It is originally composed of the hyoidean and four branchial arches, with one median, copular piece. The branchial arches form in the early life of the tadpole the elaborate framework of the filtering apparatus mentioned on p. 44. During metamorphosis the whole filter disappears, owing to resorption of the greater part of the branchial arches; only their median portions remain, and fuse with the enlarged copular piece and the hyoidean arches into a broad shield-shaped cartilage (corpus linguae), whence several lateral processes sprout out, the posterior pair of which are generally called thyrohyals or thyroid horns. The - true hyoid horns give up their larval lean-to articulation with the quadrate, become greatly elongated, and gain a new attach- ment on the otic region of the cranium. The transformation of the whole apparatus has been studied minutely by Ridewood, in Pelodytes punctatus.’ SKIN The epidermis of the young larvae of Amphibia is furnished with cilia, which later on are suppressed by the development of a thin hyaline layer or cuticula, but clusters of such cilia remain, at least during the larval life and during the periodical aquatic life of the adult, in the epidermal sense-organs. In the frog, currents are set up by the ciliary action at an earlier stage, and are maintained to a later stage than in the newt. In the latter the tail loses its ciliation, whereas in the frog it remains active almost up to the time of the metamorphosis. In tadpoles of 3-10 mm. nearly the whole surface is ciliated (Assheton).” The cilia work from head to tail, causing the little animal, when perfectly quiet, to move forwards slowly in the water. Beneath the cuticula, in the Perennibranchiata and the larvae of the other Urodela, lies a somewhat thicker layer of vertically striated cells, the so-called pseudo-cuticula, which disappears with the transformation of the upper layers of the Malpighian cells into the stratum corneum. The latter is very thin, consists of one or two layers of flattened cells, and is shed periodically by all’ *P: 2.8. 1897, p. 577. 2 Q.J.M.S. xxxviii. 1896, p. 465. 32 AMPHIBIA CHAP. ——— _ = Amphibia in one piece. In the Urodela it generally breaks loose around the mouth, and the animal slips out of the delicate, transparent, colourless “ shirt,” which during this process of ecdysis or moulting becomes inverted. In the Anura it mostly breaks along the middle line of the back, the creature struggles out of it, pokes it into its mouth, and swallows it. Urodela also eat this skin. As a rule the first ecdysis takes place towards the end of the metamorphosis, preparatory to terrestrial life. So long as the animal grows rapidly, the skin has to be shed frequently, since this corneous layer is practically dead and unyielding. Adult terrestrial Urodela do not seem to moult often, mostly only when they take to the water in the breeding season. Anura, on the other hand, moult often on land, at least every few months. The surface of the new skin is then quite moist and slimy, but it soon dries and hardens. The Malpighian stratum consists of several layers, thickest in the Perennibranchiata; in them it contains mucous cells throughout life, in others such slime-cells are restricted to larval life. Later, regular slime-glands are developed, which open on-the surface. They are very numerous, and more evenly distributed, over most parts of the body, than the specific or poison-glands, which are restricted to certain parts, often form- ing large clusters, especially on the sides of the body. They reach their greatest development in the “ parotoid glands” of the Anura. Both kinds of glands are furnished with smooth muscle-fibres, which are said to arise from the basal membrane underlying and forming part of the Malpighian layer; these muscle-cells extend later downwards into the corium. For the action of the poison, see p. 37. The stratum corneum is mostly thin, but on many parts of the body, especially in Anura, the epidermal cells proliferate and — form hard spikes or other rugosities, generally stained dark brown. With these may be grouped the nuptial excrescences so frequent in the Anura, especially on the rudiment of the thumb, and on the under surface of the joints of the fingers and toes. In many Anura, less frequently in the Urodela, the tips of the fingers and toes ave encased in thicker horny sheaths, producing claws or nails. They are best developed among newts in Onychodactylus, among the Anura in Yenopus and Hymenochirus. The horny covering of the metatarsal tubercles reaches its greatest size in II SKIN ios) 1os) the digging spur or spade of Pelobates. In most of these cases the eutis is elevated into more or less wart-like papillae, covered, of course, by the proliferated and cornified epidermis. In the female of Rana temporaria nearly the whole surface of the body becomes covered with rosy papillae during the breeding season. Similar nuptial excrescences are common, and are most note- worthy in the male of the Indian Rana liebigi. The epidermis also contains sense-organs. They attain their highest development in the larvae: later on they undergo a retrogressive change. Each of these sense-organs is a little cup-shaped papilla, visible to the naked eye. It is composed of elongated cells which form a mantle around some central cells, each of which ends in a stiff cilium perforating a thin, hyaline membrane which lines the bottom of the cup, and is perhaps the representation of the cuticula. These ciliated cells are connected with sensory fibres, the nerve entering at the bottom of the whole organ. The cilia are in direct contact with the water, but the outer rim of the whole apparatus is protected by a short tube of hyaline cuticula-like secretion. These sense-organs are, in the larvae, scattered over the head, especially near the mouth and around the eyes, whence they extend backwards on to the tail, mostly in three pairs of longitudinal rows, one near the vertebral column, the others lateral They are supphed by the lateral branch of the vagus nerve. They disappear during the metamorphosis, at least in the Anura, with the exception of Xenopus, in which they form conspicuous white objects. The white colour is caused by the tubes becoming choked with the débris of cells or coagulating mucous matter, so that it is doubtful if these organs, which moreover have sunk deeper into the skin, are still functional. In the terrestrial Urodela these organs undergo a periodical process of retrogression and rejuven- escence. During the life on land they shrink and withdraw from the surface, and their nerves likewise diminish, but in the breeding season, when the newts take again to aquatic life, they revive, are rebuilt and become prominent on the surface. They are an inheritance from the fishes, in which such lateral line organs are universally present. The cutis of most Amphibia is very rich in lymph-spaces, which, especially in the Anura, assume enormous proportions, since the so-called subcutaneous connective tissue forms com- VOL. VIII D 34 AMPHIBIA CHAP. paratively few vertical septa by which the upper and denser layers, the corium proper, are connected with the underlying muscles. The spaces are filled with lymph, and into some of them the abnormally expanded vocal sacs extend, notably in Paludicola, Leptodactylus, and other Cystignathidae, and in Rhinoderma. The cutis frequently forms papillae and prominent folds, sometimes regular longitudinal keels on the sides of the back; but dermal, more or less calcified or ossified scales are restricted to the Stegocephali and to the Apoda, ¢.v., pp. 79, 87. We con- clude that the Urodela and Anura have entirely lost these organs. Dermal ossifications, besides those which now form an integral part of the skeleton, like many of the cranial membrane-bones, are rare, and are restricted to the Anura. They are least infrequent on the head, where the skin is more or less involved in the ossification of the underlying membrane-bones, for instance in Triprion, Calyptocephalus, Hemiphractus and Pelobates. The thick ossifications in the skin of the back of several species of Ceratophrys ave very exceptional. In Brachycephalus ephippium these dermal bones enter into connection with the vertebrae ; small plates fuse with the dorsal processes of the first to third vertebrae, while one large and thick plate fuses with the rest of the dorsal vertebrae. Simple calcareous deposits in the cutis are less uncommon, for instance, in old specimens of Bufo vulgaris. We are scarcely justitied in looking upon these various calcifications and even ossifications as reminiscences of Stego- cephalous conditions. . The skin contains pigment. This is either diffuse or granular. Diffuse pigment, mostly dark brown or yellow, occurs frequently in the epidermis, even in the stratum corneum. The granular pigment is stored up in cells, the chromatophores, which send out amceboid processes, and are restricted to the cutis, mostly to its upper stratum, where they make their first appearance. Contraction of the chromatophores withdraws the pigment from the surface, expansion distributes it more or less equally. The usual colours of the pigment are black, brown, yellow, and red. Green and blue are merely subjective colours, due to interference. A peculiar kind of colouring matter is the white pigment, which probably consists of guanine, and is likewise deposited within cells; cf. the description of the white spots in the skin of Hyla coerulea. II CHANGES OF COLOUR 35 Most Amphibia are capable of changing colour, the Urodela, however, far less than the Anura, some of which exhibit an extraordinary range and adaptability in their changes. The mechanism by which the change of colour is produced in frogs has been recently studied by Biedermann.’ If we examine the green skin of the common Tree-frog, Hyla arborea, wider a low power and direct light, we see a mosaic of green, polygonal areas, separated by dark lines and interrupted by the openings of the skin-glands. Seen from below the skin appears black. Under a stronger power the black layer is seen to be composed of anastomosing and ramified black pigment-cells. Where the light shines through, the skin appears yellow. The epidermis itself is quite colourless. The mosaic layer is composed of polygonal interference-cells, each of which consists of a basal half which is granular and colourless, while the upper half is made up of yellow drops. Sometimes the tree-frog appears blackish, and if then the black pigment-cells are induced to contract, for instance, by warming the frog, it appears silver-grey; in this case the pig- ment in the yellow drops is no longer diffuse, but is concentrated into a round lump.lodged between the interstices of the granular portions; the black pigment-cells are likewise balled together. These black chromatophores send out numerous fine branches, which occasionally stretch between and round the polygonal cells. When each of these is quite surrounded and covered by the black processes, the frog appears black. On the other hand, when the black pigment-cells withdraw their processes, shrink up, and, so to speak, retire, then the light which passes through the yellow drops is, by interference, broken into green. Stoppage of the circulation of the blood in the skin causes the black chromatophores to contract. Carbon dioxide paralyses them and causes them to dilate. This is direct influence without the action of nerves. But stimulation of the central nerve -centres makes the skin turn pale. Low temperature causes expansion, high temperature contraction, of the chrom- atophores. Hence hibernating frogs are much darker than they are in the summer. Frogs kept in dry moss, or such as have escaped into the room and dry up, turn pale, regardless of light or darkness, probably owing to a central, reflex, nerve-stimulus. Tree-frogs turn green as the result of the contact with leaves. ' Arch. ges. Physiol. li. 1892, p. 455. 36 AMPHIBIA CHAP. Dark frogs will turn green when put into an absolutely dark vessel in which there are leaves. This is reflex action, and blinded specimens do the same. The principal centres of the nerves which control the chromatophores, le in the corpora bigemina and in the optic thalami of the brain. When these centres are destroyed, the frog no longer changes colour when put upon leaves, but if a nerve, for mstance the sciatic, be stimulated, the corresponding portion of the body, in this case the leg, turns green. Rough surfaces cause a sensation which makes the frog turn dark. Rana seems to depend chiefly upon ‘ temperature and the amount of moisture in the air, so far as its changes of colour are concerned. Biedermann concludes that the “chromatic function of frogs in general depends chiefly upon the sensory impressions received by the skin, while that of fishes depends upon the eye.” All this sounds very well, but the observations and experi- ments are such as are usual in physiological laboratories, and the frogs, when observed in their native haunts, or even when kept under proper conditions, do not always behave as the physiologist thinks they should. There is no doubt that in many cases the changes of colour are not voluntary, but reflex actions. It is quite conceivable that the sensation of sitting on a rough surface starts a whole train of processes: roughness means _ bark, bark is brown, change into brown; but one and the same tree- frog does not always assume the colour of the bark when it rests, or even sleeps upon, such a piece. He will, if it suits him, remain grass-green upon a yellow stone, or on a white window-frame. I purposely describe such conditions, changes, coincidences, and discrepancies in various species, notably in Hyla arborea, H. coerulea, Rana temporaria, Bufo viridis, to show that in many cases the creature knows what it is about, and that the eye plays a very important part in the decision of what colour is to be produced. The sensory impression received through the skin of the belly is the same, no matter if the board be painted white, black, or green, and how does it then come to pass that the frog adjusts its colour to a nicety to the general hue or tone of its surroundings ? Boulenger’ has given us a summary of the action of the poison of Amphibia : . 1 Nat. Sci. i. 1892, p. 185. II * POISON Ono N It is well known to all who have handled freshly-caught newts, and certain toads, especially Bombinator, that their secre- tion acts as a sternutatory, and causes irritation of the nose and eyes, the effects produced on us by Bombinator being comparable to the early stages of a cold in the head. Many collectors of Batrachians have learned, to their discomfiture, how the intro- duction of examples of certain species into the bag containing the sport of their excursion may cause the death of the other prisoners ; for although the poison has no effect on the skin of individuals of the same species, different species, however closely allied, may poison each other by mere contact. But when inoculated the poison acts even on the same individual. Miss Ormerod, to personally test the effect, pressed part of the back and tail of a live Crested Newt between the teeth. “The first effect was a bitter astringent feeling in the mouth, with irritation of the upper part of the throat, numbing of the teeth more immediately holding the animal, and in about a minute from the first touch of the newt a strong flow of saliva. This was accompanied by much foam and violent spasmodic action, approaching convulsions, but entirely confined to the mouth itself. The experiment was immediately followed by headache lasting for some hours, general discomfort of the system, and half an hour after by slight shivering fits.” Numerous experiments have shown that the poison of toads, salamanders, and newts is capable, when injected, of killing mammals, birds, reptiles, and even fishes, provided, of course, that the dose be proportionate to the size of the animal. Small birds and lizards succumb as a rule in a few minutes; guinea- pigs, rabbits, and dogs in less than an hour. This poison of Amphibia is not septic, but acts upon the heart and the central nervous system. That of the common toad has been compared, in its effects, to that of Digitalis and Erythrophlaeum. Some authorities hold that the poison is an acid, others regard it as an alkaloid. Phisalix' has come to the conclusion that toads and sala- manders are possessed of two kinds of glands, different both anatomically and physiologically. These are, first the mucous glands, spread over the greater part of the body, with an alkaloid secretion, which acts as a narcotic; secondly, specific glands, as 1 ¢. R. Ac. Sci. cix. 1889, pp. 405, 482. 38 AMPHIBIA CHAP. the parotoids and larger dorsal glands, the secretion of which is acid, and acts as a convulsive. The Indians of Colombia are said to employ the secretion of Dendrobates tinctorius for poisoning their arrows. The poison is obtained by exposing the frog to a fire, and after being scraped off the back is sufficient for poisoning fifty arrows. It acts on the central nervous system, and is used especially for shooting monkeys. Concerning the use of this poison for “dyeing” parrots, see p. 272. ; The milky secretion of toads protects them agaimst many enemies, although not always against the grass-snake. . vill RELATION TO MAMMALS 303 Many of the Theromorpha’* reached a considerable size, massive skulls of one foot in length being not uncommon. The tail was comparatively short. The many resemblances of these strange creatures to Mammals have naturally suggested that the Mammalia have sprung from some such Theromorpha or “ beast-shaped ” animals. The resemblances are chiefly the dentition, the zygomatic arch, the pelvis, the cruro-tarsal joint, the scapula which is sometimes possessed of a spine, and the occasionally double occipital con- dyle. The general shape of the skull of Cynognathus is indeed strikingly like that of a Carnivorous Mammal, and the shape of the whole body suggests rather a Mammal than a reptile; and when we have to deal with the fragmentary skulls of 7ritylodon (cf. p. 309) it is, indeed, difficult to decide to which of the two classes such a creature belongs. But the Theromorpha possess a number of important characters by which they reveal themselves at once as reptiles: (1) the large and fixed quadrate bone, which is still the sole support of the lower jaw; (2) the compound mandible, which is composed of at least an articular, dentary, angular, supra-angular, and splenial element; (3) the inter- parietal foramen; (4) the possession of prefrontal and _post- frontal bones, sometimes also postorbital, supratemporal, and quadrato-jugal bones. Of course, any of these ancestral bones may be lost, and the interparietal hole may be closed as in tortoises and crocodiles. We can also imagine that the quadrate may be relieved of its jaw-bearing function and become loosened, but this is not easy, considering the strong development of the squamoso-quadrate pedicle. - Those Theromorpha in which the quadrate itself is small, whilst the squamosal reaches down, or at least approaches the mandible, as in Dicynodon and Gordonia, are so hopelessly pledged, or specialised in other directions, that it is impossible to connect them ancestrally with Mammals. However, it is beyond reasonable question that the Mammals have sprung from some reptilian stock (the attempts to derive ' Cope, the inventor of this most appropriate name, soon changed it, un- necessarily, into Theromora (uwpds=sluggish), perhaps in order not to emphasise too much their possible Mammalian affinities ; while others rashly called them Sauro-Mammalia. For detailed illustrations of Theromorpha reference should be made to Owen, British Fossil Reptiles, 4to, London, 1849-55, and to numerous papers by Seeley, Phil. Trans. 178 (1887), 186 (1895), and by E. T. Newton in Phil. Trans. 184 (1893), 185 (1894). 304 THEROMORPHA CHAY, them from Amphibia, without the intervention of Reptiles, are as gratuitous as they have proved futile), and the Thero- morpha undoubtedly comprise creatures which of all animals approach nearest to Mammals, and coincide with them in most important features. But we have not yet found a single Theromorph which can claim to be a direct ancestor of Mammals. Since the latter occur already in the Trias, we have to look for their reptilian forefathers at least in the Lower Permian, and this naturally excludes all the known forms. The filling up of this gap is but a question of time. The ancestry of the Theromorpha themselves is also shrouded in mystery. Attempts have been made to connect them with the Permian Protorosaurus, Palaeohatteria, and Eryops. On the other hand, some retain various Stegocephalous reminis- cences (e.g. the roofed-in condition of the skull by membrane- bones, amongst which, besides others, supratemporals and post- orbitals can be recognised ; occurrence of cleithra in Pareia- saurus; distinct epiotic bones in Elginia). Although they have died out as a group, they have perhaps given rise to- several side-branches, one of which (leaving aside the question of Mammalian origin) seems to have flourished as the Dinosauria. We divide the Theromorpha into four orders, which are, how- ever, liable to run into each other, and it is reasonably to be hoped that many forms may be discovered which will connect not only these provisional orders with each other, but also with other sub-classes. . Order I. PAREIASAURI. Cranium completely roofed in by membrane-bones. The only foramina are the nostrils, orbits, and the interparietal foramen. The teeth are comparatively small, and stand in even series im both jaws. Pareiasaurus, several species from the Karroo sandstone of South Africa. P. baini was an extremely clumsy brute, of most uncouth appearance, standing between 2 and 3 feet high, and measuring with the short tail nearly 8 feet in length. The — skull is very massive, 18 inches long and. slightly broader, — with a rugose, deeply pitted surface. The teeth are thickly enamelled, serrated at the margin, with many pointed cusps ; those vill PAREIASAURI 305 of the vomer, palatines, and pterygoids are recurved and arranged in several longitudinal rows. There is a small incisive foramen in the premaxilla; the choanae lie within the pterygoids. The palate has a pair of large lateral vacuities. Between the squa- mosal and quadrate is a small foramen, as in Selodon and Sphenodon. The nares are terminal, bordered behind by the nasals, and divided by the premaxillaries. The occipital condyle is a single knob, but the lateral occipital bones also partake in its formation. The shouldér-girdle is strong. The: scapula slants backwards, is broad, and possesses a longitudinal spine, an almost exclusively Mammalian character. The scapula, coracoid and precoracoid are fused together, and are united ventrally with those of the other side. There is a T-shaped interclavicle, a pair of clavicles, and a pair of slender, long cleithra, which extend along the upper anterior margin of the scapulae. The humerus possesses enormous crests. The broad ilium is attached to two, or perhaps three, sacral ribs. The acetabulum is closed. The pubes and ischia are united into one broad mass of bone, and the obturator-foramina seem to be just large enough to permit of the passage of the nerve. Both fore- and hind-limbs are plantigrade and five-toed. The tibia articulates with one large bone, which is supposed to represent the united -astragalus and calcaneum, the latter being without an indication of a prominent heel, although there is a tendency to develop the erurotarsal into the chief joint. The number of vertebrae amounts to eighteen presacrals, eight to ten of which are cervicals. There are two or three sacral and about twenty-four mostly shortened caudal vertebrae. The latter possess intercentral wedges and chevron-bones ; wedges occur also between the cervical and some thoracic vertebrae. Some of the posterior cervical ribs are very peeuliar—straight, broadened out, turned backwards, partly over- lapped by one another, and 18 inches long, recalling the first two ribs of the crocodiles. Sternum and abdominal ribs are unknown. Elginia mirabilis The skull (Fig. 54, A, p. 280)—nothing else is known—indicates one of the most remarkable reptiles hitherto found on this side of the Atlantic. It was discovered in the Red Sandstone of Elgin (Lower Trias). The skull reminds us in its general shape and by its spikes and horns of the little American Iguanoid lizard, Phrynosoma. The length of the cranium is about 6 inches, the distance between the tips of the two largest — VOL, VIII x a a 306 THEROMORPHA CHAP. horns measures 9 inches. The teeth are small and resemble those of an Jyuvana in their shape and finely serrated edges, indicating herbivorous habits, but there are also several rows of smaller teeth on the palate, the configuration of which is not unlike that of Sphenodon. The top and sides of the skull, except the interparietal foramen, the orbits, and nostrils, are com- — pletely encased by rugose, pitted, dermal bones, most of them — with strange, horn-like spikes. In the encasement of the temporal region can be discerned a postfrontal, parietal and squa- mosal, a conically projecting epiotic, a postorbital and supra- temporal, a jugal and a quadrato-jugal, which latter almost completely covers the quadrate bone. The interparietal foramen lies far forwards, almost on a level with the orbits. The nostrils are terminal, surrounded by the short nasals, the maxillaries and the premaxillaries, which latter divide them. Order II. THERIODONTIA. The cranium is not roofed in, but shows a pair of large supratemporal fossae, bordered below by the zygoma, which is | formed mainly by the squamoso-jugal bridge, and is shut off from the orbit by the postfrontal joining the bridge. The teeth are differentiated into incisors, canines, and molars (Fig. 54, ©, p. 280). The lower canines close in front of the upper. Cynognathus, Karroo formation of South Africa. C, eratero- notus has a skull about 16 inches long, looking like that of a ferocious Carnivore; there are four incisors, huge canines, and nine molars, the latter with serrated edges and anterior and posterior cusps. The wide supratemporal fossa is borderec and closed behind by the broad lateral extension of the parietal which joins a similar extension of the squamosal bone. The latter is very long, extending to the postfrontal and to a bone which, bordering the orbit posteriorly, is either an upwa | branch of the jugal, or a postorbital bone; the latter im pretation is made probable by the occurrence of a suture will the jugal in C. platyceps. The jugal bone is very long, begin- ning at the quadrate, running along the squamosal, and forming the lower border of the orbit. The number of vertebrae is large, there being as many @ twenty-nine presacrals, six of which belong to the cervical regio VIII THERIODONTIA 207 The atlas is fused with the axis; most of the thoracic ribs articulate partly upon the intercentra. The lumbar ribs are very peculiar; they are much expanded horizontally, and overlap each other, forming thereby intercostal foramina. The broad ilium is attached to three or four sacral ribs. The acetabulum is closed. The ventral side of the pelvis shows a_ broad symphysis and has a pair of obturator-foramina. The scapula is large, directed backwards, and shows a distinct, very Mam- malian spine; it is fused with the coracoid and precoracoid. The occipital condyle of C. platyceps is kidney-shaped, with the concavity directed upwards; in C. berryi it is separated into two distinct knobs, the middle, basioccipital portion being apparently wanting. The mandible possesses a long coronoid process which ascends obliquely into the temporal fossa. Aelurosaurus, Lycosaurus, Galesaurus, and many others, likewise of the Karroo formation. In the first genus the splenial bones help to form the symphysis of the lower jaw ; teeth are also found on the palate, in opposition to Lycosaurus. This -has a skull 6 inches in length; the dental formula on either side is 7. $, c. +, m. 2; the molars are slender, conical, and recurved. Galesaurus seems to have been rather small, the low, triangular skull measuring only 2 to 3 inches in length, with four or five sharply pointed incisors, prominent canines and four or five small multicuspid or deeply serrated little molars. Endothiodon, with several species from the Karroo formation, is of uncertain systematic position, only imperfect skulls being known. The animals must have been large and bulky, the skulls being very massive and at least one foot in length. The premaxillaries and the maxillaries are toothless, their alveolar borders forming cutting, prominent edges. The same apples to the very strong lower jaw; but there is a pair of tooth-like stout projections in the upper and lower jaws in the place of canine teeth. True, enamelled, small, apparently conical or low and perhaps blunt teeth occur on either side in one or three longitudinal series upon the palate, and in corresponding positions on the inner sides of the two halves of the lower jaw. It is doubtful if the upper teeth are carried by the palatines or by the broadened inner flanges of the maxillaries. The choanae seem to lie between the pterygoids and the palatines, incompletely roofed in by ventral extensions of the latter towards the middle line. 308 THEROMORPHA | CHAP. . Direct affinity of Endothiodon (év806i, within) with Placodus is unlikely; the same applies to the Dicynodontia, although | the restriction of the teeth to the palate seems to poimt as much to the former genus as do the toothless cutting edges — of the jaws to the forms like Oudenodon. Other Theriodont reptiles have been described from the upper Permian of Russia, for instance Deuterosaurus and Brithopus, but the determination rests upon insufficient fragments. North America has yielded many strange Theromorphous fossils, some of which may belong to the Theriodont order, while others seem to be intermediate between this and the other orders. Duadectes of Texas, for instance, seems to be a Theriodont creature; while in Empedias molaris, with a skull about 8 inches in length, the teeth form an uninterrupted series without distinct canine tusks, and the incisors are distinguished from the molars only by the transversely broadened shape of the latter. Very small teeth are arranged along the median line of the vomer and united palatine bones. In Clepsydrops, Dimetrodon, and Naosaurus of Texas the teeth are differentiated into incisors, canines, and molars, although not so regularly as in the typical Theriodont forms described above, one or more pairs of teeth being enlarged into canine-like tusks. In the latter two genera the spinous processes of the thoracic vertebrae are enormously elongated, standing up verticall only one inch in diameter. In Naosawrus claviger these upright spines carry on either side half a dozen transverse projection 5. Stereorhachis of the Permian of France is typically Theriodont ir the structure of its shoulder-girdle, humerus, and pelvis, but th he dentition is composed of 3 incisors, no canines, and 3% poir ed molars. if The following genera have been placed by Seeley in the fa nily Gomehognithidee, Microgomphodon, with broader and less pr minently multicyspid teeth than those of the typical Theriodont seems ss lead ie phognathus, which has the following dentiti i. 3, ¢. 4, m. +4, with a long diastema between the ean a molars, some of which latter are nearly as broad as they are lo and have comparatively low tubercles on the crowns. The ski is remarkably like that of a Carnivorous Mammal. a incisive foramina behind the premaxilla. The maxiitasiil al palatines form a united palatal roof, and behind them op on t VIiil ANOMODONTIA 309 choanae. ‘The occipital condyle is kidney-shaped. The mandible is most extraordinary, approaching that of the Mammalian, especially the Marsupial type, except that it is still composed of several pieces. The articular facet for the mandible is borne by an outward or lateral projection, while the bulk of the posterior half of the jaw projects inwards like a broad flange, undoubtedly recalling the so-called inner inverted angle of the Marsupial jaw. The coronoid process is large and extends far into the temporal fossa. Nearly the whole skeleton of Microgomphodon is known ; the lumbar ribs are broadened and overlap as in Cynognathus, and the mandible is_ typically compound, so that there isno doubt about the affinities of this genus with the Theriodontia. It throws light upon Gompho- qnathus and the three likewise South African genera Diademodon, Trirachiodon and Tritylodon, which are all known from imperfect skulls only. Their teeth are restricted to the jaws, the molars have flat, multitubercular crowns and bear an extraordinary resemblance to those of Mammals. Some of. the molars of Tritylodon are said even to possess two roots, but this point, absolutely unique in Reptiles, but common in Mammals, is not certain. The few upper incisors of 7ritylodon are rather large, chisel-shaped, and extend like those of the Rodent-type back into the maxillaries; canines are absent, leaving a diastema. Trirvachiodon has prominent canines, the five upper molars are multitubercular, rather flat, and much broader transversely than in the longitudinal direction. Still, even these creatures, with skulls of the size of that of a small fox, possessed distinct pre- frontal and postfrontal bones, and are, at least in this respect, typical Reptiles. Order III ANOMODONTIA. The cranium is not roofed in. The pedicle for the suspension of the lower jaw is much elongated, slants slightly forwards, and is composed of the long quadrate, which is laterally overgrown by the squamosal bone. The teeth are restricted to a pair of strong, _tusk-like canines, or they are altogether absent. The margins of the upper and especially those of the lower jaw are trenchant, and were possibly furnished with a thick horny armature like those of tortoises. 2 310 THEROMORPHA CHAP. South Africa, reached formidable dimensions. The thick, curved skull is in size and outline not unlike that of a large lion, hence. D. leoniceps, D. tigriceps, etc. The zygomatic ae is ance mammahan, except that the posterior boundary of the orbit is formed by a distinct postfrontal bone. The nostrils are lateral. The canine tusks (Fig. 54, E, p. 280) are very large. The choanae open behind the rhomboid vomer and between the sepa- rated palatine bones, which are posteriorly confluent with the ; medially united pterygoids. The latter send out flat extensions, along the lateral side of the palatines; these extensions reach — the maxillaries and probably represent the ectopterygoids. The occipital condyle is distinctly triple, being equally composed of the basi- and latero-occipital bones. ; The three bones of the shoulder-girdle meet at the glenoid — fossa ; the scapula has the indication of a spime. The pelvis is — stout, attached to four or five vertebrae, converting the latter mto a very Mammalian-like sacrum, the position of which les — distinctly in front of the acetabulum. The latter is closed, composed by the three pelvic bones. The pubes and ischia are fused together, leaving only a very small obturator-foramen. The limbs are plantigrade and pentadactyle, very stout; the humerus and femur have enormous crests. Oudenodon, of which several species have been described, is so much like Dicynodon, except for the complete absence of teeth, that it has been suggested that these skulls belong to females of — this genus. This view is strengthened by the fact that tusk- like canines exist, or are absent in some of the species which | have been described as Cistecephalus, a genus closely allied to— Dicynodon. . The latter, which, like Oudenodon and Cistecephalus, occurred in Africa, extended also into India, D. orientalis having been found in the Panchet formation of Bengal, of transitional age between the Permian and _ Triassic epadie Oudenodon rugosus, on the other hand, has been described from the Ural. Gordonia and Geikia, of the New Red Sandstone of Elgin, < known from their skulls only, but these are so well preservec that there is no doubt about their close relationship to the typical South African Dicynodontia. The skull of Gordonia is about 7 inches long and 4 inches high. The canines (Fig. 54, D, p. 280) are reduced to short, but thick, conical tusks. The most } Dicynodon, with many species from the Karroo formation of VIII PLACODONTIA Fic) remarkable feature is the very elongated squamoso-jugal arch, which arises moreover from the dorsal end of the long squamoso-quadrate pedicle. The two wide and long temporal fossae are dorsally divided by narrow parietal crests. There is a distinct interparietal bone, and the usual interparietal foramen. The choanae are united and lie within the palatines, which themselves are united; the large lateral palatal foramina are otherwise enclosed by the pterygoids, quadrates, and laterally by the squamoso-jugal arch. Order IV. PLACODONTIA. These are the latest and last members of the Theromorpha, unfortunately known from skulls only, from the Muschelkalk or Middle Trias of Germany and Russia. The skull of Placodus gigas 1s about one foot long, rather high and triangular owing to the lateral expansion of the temporal arches, which diverge posteriorly. The squamoso-jugal arch is very broad, and most of the posterior border of the orbit is formed by the large postorbital bone. The maxillary bone seems to extend back to beyond the level of the orbits. The choanae le behind the pre- maxillaries. The palatines and pterygoids are fused in the middle line, forming a broad bony palate, which, owing to the broad, posteriorly extended wings of the pterygoids, much re- ssembles that of the crocodiles. The teeth are very remarkable. There are two or three stout, conical, or chisel-like teeth in each premaxillary bone, and three to five broad and flat maxillary teeth ; three pairs of huge, broad, and quite flat teeth are crowded together and fill up the whole vomerine and palatine portion of the palate. These crushing teeth indicate that P/acodus probably lived upon hard-shelled molluscs, and this would be in confornuty with its occurrence in the Muschelkalk, which is a strictly marine deposit and full of shells. Another closely allied genus is Cya- modus, one species of which is known from Russia. The teeth are fewer in number and not so large as those of Placodus. CHAPTER IX CHELONIA—ATHECAE—THECOPHORA Sub-CLAss IV.—CHELONLIA. THERE is no mistaking a tortoise. The shell and the horn- covered toothless jaws separate them from all other four- footed creatures. They may be described as terrestrial or aquatic, pentadactyle reptiles, with walking limbs or with paddles ; ribs with capitular portions only, two sacral vertebrae, humerus with entepicondylai foramen, pubes and ischia forming symphyses, quadrate bones fixed, jaws without teeth, but with cutting horny sheaths. Trunk encased in a bony shell, composed of numerous dorsal and ventral dermal bones, forming a carapace and a plastron, which may or may not be covered with horny shields. Copulatory never transverse. Oviparous. ( It is customary to distinguish the marine, paddle-limbed kinds as Turtles, the others as Land- and Water-tortoises. i Tortoises occur already in the Trias. They reached thei greatest development towards the end of the Mesozoic and the earlier Tertiary periods. They are now comparati reduced in the number of families and genera, although the} are still represented by about 200 species. The sub-class as whole is cosmopolitan, but does.not occur in the colder regions Their origin is quite unknown. Of recent groups only tl Crocodilia and the Rhynchocephalia come into consideratio Combination of these groups with the Chelonia leads to s unknown forms whence also the Theromorpha have a Palaeontology does not help us, all the leading, main groups ¢ CHAP. IX CHELONIA—CLASSIFICATION 313 and Palaeozoic Chelonia are still unknown. We can, however. to a certain extent, reconstruct an ideal primordial Chelonian by assigning to it all the ancestral characters actually observed in recent and fossil kinds, and by reducing to simpler conditions those features which we know to be more or less exaggerated specialisations. It is reasonable to assume that originally each metamere, except those of the anterior half of the neck and the posterior half of the tail, carried a transverse series of dermal plates, covered with horny shields, while the trunk, acgording to the greater bulk of the body, increased in size, converging towards the root of the neck and tail. By concentration, reduction of the number, and increase in the size of some of the remaining plates and shields, the skull assumed its characteristic box-like shape, the neck and tail becoming at the same time free. Chelonia are without doubt descendants of terrestrial, or at least semi- aquatic reptiles, and the marine paddled forms subsequently developed from terrestrial kinds. Classification of Chelonia.—After many vicissitudes it was recognised that the Chelonia cannot naturally be divided according to the modification of their feet. The TrIioNYCHOIDEA were clearly separated from the rest by Stannius in 1854. Cope, in 1870, was the first to emphasise the important character of the mode in which the neck is either bent sidewards (PLEURODIRA) or withdrawn in an S-shaped curve in a vertical plane (Cryproprra) ; and he also separated Sphargis as ATHECAE from all the other Chelonians, for which Dollo in 1886 proposed ‘the term THEcorpHoRA. The division of the latter into recog- -nisable families, based upon reliable, chiefly internal, skeletal, characters, has been effected by Boulenger ;* and his classification has been adopted in the present volume, after intercalation of the more important fossil forms. The relationships between these , Various families may perhaps be indicated as follows :— a ATHECAE. F : Sphargidae ‘ | Pleurodira f ee : _ CHELONIA \ Chelydidae—Carettochelydidae ian | Chelydridae— Dermatemydidae— LTHECOPHORA, (bap Cinosternidae cee Platysternidae si Testudinidae—Chelonidae te Trionychoidea Trionychidae ——. — . 1 Cat. Chelonians, Brit. Mus. 1889. 3 314 CHELONIA CHAP. | a The guiding taxonomic characters are fully mentioned at the head of the different families, and are mostly internal. The following “key,” adapted from Boulenger, and based upon ex- ternal phase is preferable for paca purposes. For the position and names of the horny shields see Fig. 61 on p- 315. = Shell covered with horny shields. a Digits distinct, with 5 or 4 claws. . _ Pectoral shields separated from the marginals by = marginals, Tail long and crested. Plastron small and cruciforn m. North America ; . Chelydridae, p. 338. Tail long, covered with rings of shields. - Plastron large. Indo-China Platysternidae, p. 345. Tail. short. North and Dermatemydidae, p. 341. Central America . \|Cinosternidae, p. 342. Pectoral shields in contact with the marginals. Plastral shields 11 or 12, without an icterrallaa Neck retractile in an S-shaped vertical curve 2 : Testudinidae, p. 345. Plastral shields 13, an intergular being present. i Neck bending sideways under { Chelydidae, p. 399. the shell : : Pelomedusidae, p. 390. Limbs paddle-shaped, with one or two claws . Chelonidae, p. ate 8. Shell without horny shields, covered with soft, leathery skin. ‘ Digits distinct, broadly webbed, but with only ai three Bes 3 ; 5 : . Trionychoidea, p. 404 Limbs paddle-shaped. - Shell composed of regular series of bony plates. Two claws . Carettochelydidae, niall 4 Shell composed of very many small plates arranged — mosaic. Noclaws . : . Sphargidae, p. 33% The vertebrae are, sometimes in the various regions of the same individual, amphi-, opistho- or pro-coelous, or even bico nea 3 ae chorda remain longest in eg middle of the e short chevrons. The latter occasionally fuse with the — end of their centra. Intercentral discs of fibrous cartilag regularly in the neck and tail. The ribs develop origin the same transverse level with these discs, and frequen anterior thoracic vertebrae retain this intercentral or interve position throughout life. Farther back they often show a g1 uC change from the intercentral to a more central and ultimat IX SKELETON 315 remarkable to a purely neural attachment. In all the Chelonia the ribs are devoid of the tubercular portion. The cervical vertebrae have no ribs, except mere traces in the shape of small nodules. On the tail the ribs are often large, and, when fused with their neural supports, look like transverse processes ; the whole arrangement exactly resembles that of Crocodilia. The first pair of thoracic ribs, those borne by the Fic. 61.—Various plastra and their horny shields. 1, Testudo ibera ; 2, Macroclemmys temmincki ; 3, Cinosternum odoratum ; 4, Sternothaerus nigricans ; 5, Chelodina longicollis ; 6, Chelone mydas. « or an, Anal shield ; abd, abdominal shield ; 7 or Jem, femoral; g or gul, gular, unpaired in Fig. 3; hk or hum, humeral shield ; 7 or int.g, intergular ; im, infra-marginals ; m, marginals ; p or pect, pectoral ; 2, in Fig. 1, inguinal shield constituting, with the axillary az, the last trace of infra- marginals, ninth vertebra, are peculiar. They arise from the anterior portion of the centrum, are much reduced, sometimes to mere _ threads of bone, and lean against the anterior rim of the second pair of ribs, in many cases without reaching the carapace. The next following ribs, those of the tenth to the sixteenth vertebra, are intimately involved in the formation of the first to seventh costal plates. The ribs of the two sacral vertebrae sometimes remain quite distinct throughout life, just touching the upper | 316 CHELONIA CHAP. . : ends of the iliac bones; but since these find a much more effective | support in the shell, the distal ends of the sacral vertebrae fuse with the eighth, or so-called last, pair of costal plates. ; The neural arch of the ninth vertebra rests upon its — centrum: but the neural arches of the other trunk-vertebrae, — although long, rest upon two centra; retaining, like the ribs, — their original intercentral position; and in most cases the neuro-central sutures remain throughout life. The atlas and the last cervical vertebra deserve special attention. In many tortoises, eg. Trionyx, Clemmys, Testudo, the three constituent parts of the atlas, namely, the neural arch, the centrum, and the intercentrum or first pair of united basiventralia, do not ankylose, but remain loosely connected; and the first centrum, — instead of forming an odontoid process, remains movably attached to the second centrum, although it sometimes carries, and fuses with, the second intercentral piece. In other tortoises, eg. Platemys and Chelys, however, all the parts of the atlas co-ossify and form a complete, solid vertebra which articulates by a concavo-convex joint with L S = & =) the centrum of the second vertebra. The normal number of cervical vertebrae is ox) eight in all Chelonians. The first spinal TSS : nerve issues between occiput and atlas, 3 Fic. 62.—1, The complete ee : e atlas of an adult Trionyz then vertebrae. ‘The last, or eighth a ~ hurum. The second basi- vical, owing to the retractility of the neck, ventral (white) is attached fi laharate ania ae ineitee “ay to the posterior end of the orms elaborate joints , 1t8 Centre s WE = first centrum, which, not g knob into a cup of the ninth, and its being fused with the second ‘ d centrum, is not yet an post-zygapophyses form broad, curve odontoid process. 2, The articulating concave facets for the recep complete atlas of an adult .. é fia Trionyx gangeticus, stil tion of the anterior zygapophyses of the typically temnospondylous. fixed ninth vertebra. In the Trionychidae 3, The first and second cer- vical vertebrae of an adult the zygapophyses are most elaborate, al Platemys. 4, The complete they alone articulate with the ninth 1 atlas of a Chelys fimbriato. F . oe tebra, while the centra do not join, bt remain, or rather become, separated by partial resorption. I the Chelonidae, in conformity with the non-retractile and s neck, all the cervical joints are much reduced. The skull (cf. Fig. 54, H, I, K, p. 280) agrees fundamental: 1x SKULL 317 characterised by several special features. There are no ecto- pterygoids or ossa transversa; no lacrymal bones, no inter- parietal or pineal foramen; the vomer is unpaired and the nasal bones are mostly absent, unless they ‘are fused with the prefrontals. The premaxillae are very small. The single vomer forms a septum between the choanae; and these are, except in Sphargis, ventrally roofed over by wings sent out by the palatines. The latter form a continuous bony roof to the mouth with the pterygoids, and these diverge.posteriorly, being connected suturally with the quadrates, lateral and basi-occipital bones, and with the unpaired basi-sphenoid, which appears between the _basi- Fic. 63.—Skull of Chelone mydas. A, from the left side; in B, the postfrontal and squamosal bones have been removed, and the broad expansions of the jngal, quadrato- jugal, parietal, and quadrate bones have been reduced in order to re- duce the skull to more primitive conditions. F, Frontal; J, jugal ; L.0, lateral occipital ; Mz, maxil- lary ; Op, opisthotic ; Pal, palatine ; Par, parietal; Prf, prefrontal ; Pro, pro-otic ; Pt.f, postfrontal ; Ptg, pterygoid ; Q, quadrate ; Qj, quadrato-jugal ; S.o, supra -occi- pital ; Sg, squamosal. occipital and the diverging pterygoids,! but is in most cases to a great extent overlapped by the latter. The occipital condyle is distinctly triple ; the basi-occipital sometimes helps to border the foramen magnum. The supra-occipital sends out a long vertical blade, directed backwards and generally projecting far over the neck, for the attachment of the powerful cranio-cervical muscles. The quadrate is very peculiar. Firmly attached, and hemmed ‘in on nearly all sides by the neighbouring bones, it stands nearly vertically and forms a broad articulating surface for the mandible. Its posterior side shows either a transverse, horizontal groove, in which lies the columella auris, or the groove is transformed into a more or less closed canal. Moreover, the hinder lateral margin of the quadraté forms most of the tympanic frame; its margins being curved kwards, leaving in the Cryptodira, however, a 318 CHELONIA CHAP. wide notch behind; in the Pleurodira this part of the quadrate is transformed into a trumpet, the wide rim of which, forming a complete ring, carries the tympanic membrane. The tympanic cavity thus formed often leads into a deep recess which extends beneath the squamosal towards the opisthotic and bears some resemblance to the intricate tympanic recesses which pervade that region of the Crocodilian skull. Dorsally the quadrate is broadly overlaid by the squamosal, which frequently forms an arch with the parietal. Anteriorly — the quadrate is connected through a variably sized quadrato- jugal with the jugal; and this, by joining the maxilla and post-— frontal, helps normally to form the posterior rim of the orbit. All the bones which border the temporal fossa vary much in extent in the different groups of Chelonia. The extremes are represented by Cistudo and Geoemyda, in which the bony infra- temporal arch is absent, owing to the loss of the quadrato-jugal ; and on the other hand by the Chelonidae and by Sphargis, in which the whole temporal region is covered over by an additional - “false cranial” roof. This roof is produced chiefly by lateral wing-like expansions of the parietal and postfrontal bones, — which meet the likewise much expanded jugal, quadrato-jugal, and squamosal bones. In the lower diagram of Fig. 63 (Chelone — mydas) the squamosal has been removed, and the other bones have been reduced to their normal, or rather primitive condition, for comparison with the external view of the complete skull of the same animal. The lower diagram shows also the connexion of the pterygoid with a descending process of the parietal; this column, paired of course, usually contains a separate bone, the epipterygoid, the portion between Ptg and Par. : The hyoidean apparatus is well developed, and sometimes assumes large dimensions, especially in Chelys. The two pairs of “horns” are the first and second branchial arches, whilst the hyoid arches are reduced to a pair of small, frequently - cartilaginous, nodules attached near the anterior corners of th basis Lngnae, which generally fuses with the os entoglossum 1 the tip of the tongue. The pectoral arch consists of a pair of long coracoids sloping obliquely backwards, the distal cartilages of which scareel touch each other in the middle line, and the scapulae. | upper end of the scapula frequently touches the inside of th Pa IX SKELETON 319 first costal plate, protected by a cartilaginous pad. Near the glenoid cavity arises a long process (PC in Fig. 65), placed transversely and approaching its fellow. The distal end is con- nected with that of the coracoid by a fibro-cartilaginous band. The homology of this scapular process is not quite clear. The band just mentioned favours the idea that the process represents the precoracoid, but its being an outgrowth from the scapula suggests that it is merely the much enlarged acromion. It certainly does not represent, the clavicle, which forms part of the plastron: and this is nct in contact with the shoulder-girdle at all. OEE Plastron.__——. Fic. 64.—Diagram of the skeleton of Testwdo elephantopus, after removal of the left half of the carapace. The plastron is roughly indicated by a section through the middle line. #e, Femur, foreshortened ; F%, fibula; H, humerus; J/, ilium ; Js, ischium ; P.P., pubis; R, radius; Scap, scapula; Tb, tibia; wv, ulna; 3, third cervical vertebra; 1, 3, 5, first, third, and fifth fingers; xz, thirteenth (fifth thoracic) vertebra. The pelvis is strong. Ilium, pubis, and ischium meet at the acetabulum. The dorsal end of the ilium is generally broad- ened, and is attached to one or both sacral vertebrae, but it is also in contact with the superimposed last costal plate. This additional connexion often becomes predominant and the sacral vertebrae are partly or completely relieved of the iliac support, fusing in this case more or less with the costal plates. The _ pubes have strong lateral processes, directed obliquely forwards and downwards. The pubes and the ischia, which latter are much smaller, form broad symphyses, and these are connected with each other by a longitudinal cartilaginous band (Chelone, Trionyx); or the connecting bridge is broad and quite ossified (Testudo), forming in the latter case two roundish obturator- foramina. Cartilage frequently remains at the anterior end of , 320 CHELONIA CHAPS @ the pubic symphysis, and a smaller, longer, and narrow piece of cartilage extends sometimes backwards from the ischiadic sym- physis, as the so-called hypo-ischium. In the Pleurodira the — ends of the ilia, and those of the lateral processes of the pubes, are much broadened and firmly ankylosed with the posterior costal plates and with the xiphiplastron respectively. ee btils a) Tw vo 64a Ang he ee Fic. 65.—Ventral view of the bony shell of Chelone mydas, the Green Turtle, after — removal of the plastron (Fig. 66). The costal plates are marked by cross lines to distinguish them from the ribs. ©, coracoid ; Fe, femur ; F%, fibula ; 7, humerus; — Ma.1-Ma.12, marginal plates, some of which are fused together ; Wu, nuchal plate 5 PC, “ precoracoid” ; R, radius ; Sc, scapula ; 7, V, first and fifth digits ; 1X, Ninth vertebra or first thoracic. 7 The limbs are typically pentadactyle and complete, and are most primitive in water-tortoises, e.g. Chelydra and Hmys, m including the pisiform. In Testudo the centrale is fused with the intermedium, and the first three distal carpals are also fused together. ( In the marine turtles the limbs are transformed into Ix CARAPACE ° 321 and the first metacarpal are enlarged and _ flattened, thereby giving additional width to the paddle. The tarsus remains less primitive; the centrale and the proximal elements have a tendency to fuse together, most com- pletely in land-tortoises; the fifth distal carpal is enlarged, and stands out hook-like from the rest. The number of the phalanges of the fingers and toes varies slightly. It is noteworthy that none of the Chelonia possess more than three phalanges. The three middle fingers and toes have mostly three phal- anges; the pollex and hallux have always two; the number of phal- anges of the fifth finger varies from three to one, of the fifth toe from two to none. The greatest reduc- ae ee aap ater ye tion occurs in Zestudo and its allied the right side the position of the : : covering horny shields! is indi- genera of typical land - tortoises, cated by dotted lines. a, Anal Homopus, Pyzxis, and Cinixys, ; the ae SESS ab, abdominal ; S; j 5 emoral; g, gular; h, humeral 5 formula for the fingers being ig, intergular ; im, infra-marginals ; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 or 1, and 2, 2,2, 2,0 2 pectoral. for the toes. In Pelomedusa all the fingers possess two phalanges only, owing to fusion of the first and second phalanges with each other. The shell, which is the most characteristic feature of the Chelonia, consists of the dorsal « carapace” and the ventral “plastron.” Each is composed of a considerable number of bony plates which arise as ossifications of nearly the whole thickness of the cutis, only a thin layer of subcutaneous connective tissue yemaining soft and lining the inside of the shell. We restrict ourselves to a description of the shell of the Thecophora, leaving the discussion of the peculiar shell of Sphargis to p- 336 f. Very young tortoises are still soft, and the plates which are beginning to ossify are not yet suturally united. The plastron (Figs. 66 and 67) consists of the paired epj-, hyo-, hypo-, and xiphi-plastral plates, and the unpaired endo-plastral plate. The latter is homo- : * It should be noted that the horny pieces of the carapace are termed “shields ” and the bony pieces “plates.” VOL. VIII Ms i ; =a gx: 322 . - CHELONIA cHaP. logous with the interclavicle, the epi-plastra are homologous with the clavicles of other Reptiles, while the other pieces are genetically derived from, and are further modifications of, the so-called abdominal ribs of the Crocodilia and Prosauria. These plastral plates are never in direct contact with the i) La] Fic. 67.—Bony shell of Testvdo ibera. A, Ventral; B, dorsal ; C, left-side view. In B, and on the right half of A, the position of the horny shields is indicated by dotted lines. The underlying bony plates are marked by strong lines. Ig B the lst neural and costal plates, the 4th neural, costal, and 6th marginal plates, and the 7th neural plate are shaded. 1, 4, 6, First, fourth, and sixth neural plate; M, in CG, fifth left marginal plate ; Nw, nuchal plate. shoulder-girdle or with any other parts of the internal skeleton. In the young of all tortoises, and in the adult of the Chelonidae and Trionychidae, the several plastral plates enclose large, irregulatly-shaped fontanelles. These are more or less filled up in the other groups; and in the Testudinidae especially the whole plastron forms one continuous mass. The navel is situ- ated between the hyo- and hypo-plastrals. Both these pairs are broader than the otbers, and are connected with the carapace by eS means of several marginals. The connecting region is called the bridge. In several tortoises, e.g. Hmys, the connexion with the marginals is formed by ligaments only and remains movable. In others, transverse, more or less perfect hinges are formed across the plastron. A rather imperfect joint between the hypo- and xiphi-plastrals develops with age in Yestudo ibera. In Cistudo and Cyclemys a very effective hinge les below the hyo- and hypo-plastrals, just in front of the bridge; and the anterior and posterior lobes of the plastron can be closed Neural Plate 7 Ci Saat 5 =C=; “Xe === IR : —— Sp.€ . Vertebra = Rib Plastron. Fic. 68.—A, Diagrammatic transverse section through the shell of Jestudo. On the right side the horny shields have been removed, on the left are shown the neural, costal, marginal, and pectoral shields. The bony dermal plates are dotted. Cap, Capitular portion of rib ; Sp.C, position of spinal cord. B, Vertical section through part of the shell, magnified and diagrammatic. 3B, Bony layer of the cutis ; L, leathery layer of the cutis ; M, cells of the Malpighian layer ; P, star-shaped pig- ment-eells ; sc, stratum corneum, composing the horny shields. against the inner rim of the box, fitting tightly in Cistudo. In Pyxis the front lobe only is movable. The carapace is composed of one median series, a right and left lateral series of costal plates, and a series of marginals which surround the whole. The median series consists of one large nuchal plate, normally eight neurals and one to three supracaudal plates. The characteristic feature of the neural plates is that they are firmly fused with the broadened neural spinous processes of the underlying vertebrae. The nuchal plate lies in front of the first thoracic or ninth vertebra; it overlies the last cervical vertebrae, with the eighth of which it is connected by ligament only; but the posterior corner of the plate often fuses with the spine of the ninth vertebra. In the Chelydridae, and still 324 CHELONIA CHAP. more in the Trionychidae, the nuchal sends out a pair of long rib-like processes, which either extend to below some of the neighbouring marginals, or their ends overlap those of the ribs of the second thoracic vertebra (e.g. Zrionyx), or, lastly, they are in turn overlapped by the first costal plates (e.g. Cyclanorbis). Such rib-like processes are also present, well developed in the young, shorter in the adult, in the Dermatemydidae and Cino- sternidae. It is possible that the nuchal plate represents the fused neural of the eighth and the costal plates of the ninth vertebrae. An indication of the compound nature of the nuchal may be found in the fact that two nuchals have been described in Chelydropsis carinata, a Miocene relation of Chelydra. Some- what similar modifications have taken place in the post-sacral region. The one to three supracaudal plates are, namely, neurals which have lost their connexion with, or perhaps have never been fused with, the spinous processes of the movable tail- vertebrae. The number of neural plates is mostly eight, but there are sometimes individually nine or ten, the gradual suppression taking place first in the sacral region. When such a plate is suppressed the neighbouring costal plates usually close up and meet in the median line. In Cistudo, for instance, there are only seven normal neurals, the eighth pair of costals meet, and the original eighth neural is transformed into a supracaudal. In Cinosternum the sixth to eighth costals meet, separating the one supracaudal widely from the remaining five neurals. The meeting of the last pair of costals, with co-ordinate reduction of the neurals to seven, is almost universal in the Pleurodira ; and this tendency is carried out to an extreme in the Brazilian Platemys and in the Australian Chelodina and its allies, in ~ which all the costals meet in the middle line, and the neurals are completely suppressed. Every stage intermediate between — complete neurals (Sternothaerus) and interrupted, vestigial, and — vanished neurals, is still represented by some genus. This pro- — cess takes place independently, both in America and in Australia, — and is one of the most recently introduced modifications. . The costal plates arise, like the neurals, independently in the cutis, but they soon come into contact with the underlying © cartilage of the ribs, which are long enough to reach the marginals. The ribs flatten, become surrounded by the growing membrane-bone of the plates, and the cartilage of the ribs, Ix CARAPACE 325 instead of ossifying, undergoes a process of calcification. Ulti- mately this is more or less absorbed, its place is taken by the dermal bone, which forms so to speak a cast of the rib, pre- serving in many cases the shape of the vanished rib, only, the capitular portions of which remain unaffected. The number of costal plates is very constant, namely eight on each side, but some fossils have nine or ten, and there are still individual variations in recent forms, indicative of that number. In a large Chrysemys concinna I-find the last pair of costals clearly composed of at least two pairs, and this same specimen has-nine distinct neural plates. The marginal plates are originally paired, almost always eleven pairs, very rarely ten or twelve; an unpaired posterior plate, the pygal, is always present, and is probably the result of fusion. In the Chelonidae large fenestrae remain between the costal and marginal plates, only covered by leathery unossified cutis, and of course by the horny shields. In the Indian fresh-water genus Batagur similar windows are gradually filled up with age, and the horny shields become extremely thin and almost confluent. On the other hand, in Zestudo polyphemus, the bony shell, always very thin, becomes still thinner with age and finally fenestrated by absorption. Great reduction has taken place in the carapace of the ‘Trionychidae. The American species of TZrionyx have only seven pairs of costal plates; in Cyclanorbis the neurals are reduced to two. The whole dorsal shell is much smaller than the body, and marginal plates are absent or merely vestigial. It is doubtful if the ossifications in the posterior half of the marginal flap of some genera are homologous with true marginals. Externally the whole shell is covered, except in the Zriony- chidae,in Sphargis and Carettochelys, with horny, epidermal shields. These are phylogenetically older than the dermal plates, and they do not correspond with them either in numbers or in position, although there exists a general resemblance in their arrangement. On the plastron we distinguish an unpaired or paired gular, and a pair of gular, humeral, pectoral, abdominal, femoral, and anal shields (Fig. 66). Sometimes there are also intergulars, paired in Macroclemmys and Chelys, unpaired in Chelone ; in many of the Pleurodira an unpaired intergular lies behind the gulars. 326 CHELONIA CHAP. IX The carapace of most Chelonians is covered with five neural, four pairs of costal and twelve pairs of marginal shields, the last of which often forms an unpaired pygal. In front of the first neural lies the nuchal shield, very variable in size, often absent. The Chelydridae, Dermatemydidae, Platysternidae, and Cinosternidae possess moreover several inframarginals, intercalated on the bridge between the marginal and some of the plastral shields. In many of the other families these inframarginals are restricted to the anterior and posterior corners of the bridge, as the so-called axillaries and — inguinals, mostly small and variable. Lastly, Macroclemmys has several small supramarginals. j There are consequently eleven longitudinal rows of shields in all; by elimination of the supra- and infra-marginals they are reduced to seven rows. It is absolutely certain that the number of transverse rows also was originally much greater than it is now. The mode of reduction of the number of the neural and costal shields has been studied in Thalassochelys caretta (cf. p- 388.) The accompanying illustration (Fig. 69) shows some of the main stages actually observed in the reduction of these shields. The chief point is that certain shields are squeezed out, or sup- pressed by their enlarging neighbours. The ultimate result is the formation of fewer, but larger shields. Each shield grows individually as follows. Every year, or rather during every periodically recurring period of growth, the area of the Malpighian layer belonging to each shield increases peripherally in size, and at the same time produces a new layer of horn. The original little shield, with which the tortoise 1s born, remains for years, often throughout life, as the so-called “areola a it increases in thickness owing to the new layer of horn added from below, and peripherally the increase in size is indicated by the overlapping concentric rings. Each ring represents a year’s growth, at least in tortoises which live in temperate zones, where hibernation means a complete suspension of growth. It is not known if the same applies to tropical species, which grow either throughout the year, or which undergo one or more periods of rest. The areola does not remain central; the growth is uneven. With age the oldest layers of the areola are frequently rubbed off and the areola then appears enlarged. For the first dozen years 01 so the annual rings can be easily followed, but when the creature approaches maturity each shield adds very little to its growtt / Gig) — (EE . oe a M) hi eg i Bes SS ll Fie.69.— Diagrams illustrating the progressive reduction of the horny shields in various Chelonians. The shields, the fate of which it is desired to follow, are indicated by distinctive shading. I. Hypothetical, primitive stage. Eight neural (including the nuchal) and eight costal shields. Both neurals and costals lie in the same trans- verse planes. JI.-VII. Successive stages in the reduction and suppression of various shields, observed in specimens of Thalassochelys, the normal condition of which is represented by VII. VIII. Six neurals and only four costals. The normal condi- tion of Chelone. IX. The nuchal shield has become very small and the resulting gap has been filled up by an enlargement of the first pair of marginals. This is the normal condition of most Cryptodirous tortoises. X. The first marginals meet in front and the nuchal is either suppressed (Xa), e.g. in several species of Testudo, or it is surrounded by the marginals (Xd), e.g. in Sternothaerus. (From Willey’s Zool. Results, 1899.) 328 CHELONIA CHAP. and the rings become very fine, crowded and irregular. Only by careful counting and comparison of the rings on the costals, marginals, and plastrals, can a reliable average be arrived at. In some tortoises, e.g. Chrysemys, the whole outer layer of the shields peels off periodically; only a thin smooth layer lke mica or tracing- paper remains, of course without any indication of rings. The pigment is formed in the Malpighian layer, but it frequently diffuses into the horny shields themselves, notably in Chelone imbricata, which yields the beautiful “ tortoise-shell.” The colour of the pigment is-either black, yellow, or red, with resulting combinations. The green colour, often so beautiful in baby- specimens of Chrysemys, is optical, produced, according to Agassiz, by a network of black pigment, spread over a layer of yellow oil. Horny scales, sometimes forming spines, and covering a nodule of dermal ossification, are also common on other parts of the skin, especially on the limbs of land-tortoises, and also on the tail of Chelydra. Sometimes the end of the tail is protected by a claw- like nail, for instance in Pyxis. In some of the gigantic land- tortoises, and in Chelone mydas, this nail assumes large dimensions, and several of the terminal caudal vertebrae are fused together into a regular urostyle. In some subfossil specimens of Mauritian tortoises, these ankylosed complexes are 12 cm. long and more | than 5 cm. broad! Before leaving the description of the shell, it is worth while to draw attention to the enormous correlative changes in other organs produced by this case. Nearly the whole organism has been altered. The hard, firm carapace has partly rendered the supporting functions of the vertebral column unnecessary or impossible. In many tortoises, especially in the large land-tortoises, the vertebrae and the capitular portions of the ribs are reduced to mere bony out- lines ; the reduction to thin paper-like bony lamellae proceeds with _ age. The iliac benes find a better support in the costal plates; the contact with the sacral ribs is given up, and these ribs fuse - partly with the costal plates, or they are absorbed. The whole . mass of muscles of the trunk is completely lost in the region of the shell, but traces of them exist in young specimens. Neck, limbs, and tail can in most cases be withdrawn and hidden in oy the shell. When this is not possible it is due to secondary changes. The neck is withdrawn either by being tucked away — Ix REGENERATION—SENSE-ORGANS 329 = sideways (Pleurodira *), or by being bent in an S-shaped curve in a vertical plane. In a left-sided profile-view of the animal, the head represents the tail of the S. The neck is withdrawn by long muscles, which are inserted into the ventral side of the middle of the neck, and extend in the shape of vertical ribbons far back into the shell, arismg from the centra of some of the middle or even more posterior thoracic vertebrae. Lastly, a few remarks on the partial regeneration, or the mending of injuries to the shell. If part of the horny covering is badly bruised, torn off, or rubbed through, or if part of the shell is crushed, the underlying portion of the bony plate becomes necrotic, and the horny covering also dies so far as its Malpighian layer is destroyed. Soon, however, the uninjured Malpighian cells, around the margin of the wound, multiply, grow into and beneath the injured portion of the bone, and forma new horny layer, casting off the necrotic portion. After several months the deficiency is patched up; new bone has grown in the deeper remaining strata of the cutis, and the outside is covered by a continuous horny layer, without, however, reproducing the original concentric moulding of the shields. In badly crushed shells sometimes almost one-third of the whole shell is thus cast off and mended within one or two years. The re- generation of the forcibly stripped-off shields of Chelone imbricata is described on p. 386. Bitten-off tails and limbs, rather frequent occurrences in water-tortoises, are of course not repro- duced, but the wounds are healed and covered again with scaly skin. Sense-organs.—The EYE is by far the best developed sense- organ. It is comparatively small. The pupil is round. The iris is mostly dark in terrestrial forms, while in water-tortoises it is often brightly coloured, for instance pale yellow in Chelodina, greenish and mottled with black, pale grey, brown, etc., in various species of Chrysemys. Cistudo presents a. curious sexual dimorphism; the males have red, the females brown, eyes. The sclerotic wall contains a ring of numerous small - ossified plates. There is no trace of a pecten. ‘The eye is pro- tected externally by the two lids and the nictitating membrane. In some water-tortoises, notably in Chelodina, the lower lid is transparent. Lacrymal and Harderian glands are present. 1 ardevpdv, side ; deipy, neck. 330 CHELONIA CHAP, The SENSE OF HEARING is apparently not very acute, although ~ tortoises and turtles are frightened by noise, and can distinguish sounds; otherwise they would have no voice, which is very tiny and piping in most tortoises during the pairing season. In most water-tortoises the tympanic membrane is thin and quite exposed ; in land-tortoises it is often thick and covered by the ordinary skin ; lastly, in Chelone the tympanic cavity is filled with a plug of the much-thickened skin, possibly in adaptation to the water- pressure when these creatures dive to considerable depths. The ossicular chain is mostly reduced to a long, bony, columellar rod. The SENSE OF SMELL is well developed. All Chelonians care- fully smell their food, in the air as well as under water. The individual predilection shown by many species for different kinds of animal and vegetable food—since they are, for instance, able to distinguish between the various sorts of cabbage, cauliflower, sprouts, etc..—proves that they possess a considerable amount of smell and taste. Tortoises have a fine sense of touch; even the slightest tap on the shellis noticed, and the skin of the soft parts is extremely ; sensitive. Tickling of the sides of the tail, or of the hinder surface of a thigh, produces ridiculous scratching actions of the same or of the opposite foot. The digestive apparatus is simple. Only a few peculiarities — need be mentioned. The tongue is mostly broad and soft; it cannot be protruded. The cesophapeay of the Chelonidae is comma , with many conical projections pointing towards the stomach. The — latter is simple, except in Sphargis. The intestine is devoid of a — caecum, but the difference between the small intestine and the 4 rectum is very marked and often abrupt. The cloaca is very roomy. It contains the large copulatory organ, which is unpaired, grooved on its dorsal side, nae is altogether constructed like that . e the Crocodilia. The large bladder opens ventrally into the urodaeum, a recess of the éloaéa : near its base open the urinary and genital ducts. Many wate eaengiees possess also a pair of lateral thin-walled sacs, the so-called anal sacs, dorso-lateral diverticula of the walls of the urodaeum. These saes, which have highly vascularised walls, are incessantly filled and emptied with water through the vent, and act as important respiratory organs. When such a water-tortoise, for instance an Hmys or a Clemmys, is suddenly taken out of the water, it squirts out a Ix DIGESTION——-RESPIRATION——_EGGS cice! stream of this water, which is not, as is generally supposed, the urine from the bladder. The mode of respiration is interesting. The lungs are very complicated, highly - developed, spongy structures. They are attached by their whole dorsal surface to the inner lining of the shell. As they cannot expand through their own initiative, and since the shell has made costal and abdominal expansion impossible, the tortoise has to resort to other means of producing the necessary vacuum. ‘This is done partly by the neck and the limbs, which act lke pistons in being drawn in and out; partly by the greatly developed hyoidean apparatus, by which, when the neck is stretched out, the throat is alternately inflated and emptied, the air being swallowed, or pumped into the lungs. Additional respiration, besides that of the anal sacs mentioned above, is effected in various aquatic tortoises by slightly vas- eularised recesses of the pharyngeal region. Most Chelonians can exist for a very long time without breathing; sulky individuals remain for hours or days under water. Cistudo can shut itself up for an equally long time. Nevertheless this and other land- tortoises easily get drowned. All Chelonians lay white eggs, round or oval, according to their kind, but the shape of the eggs of one set sometimes varies within the greatest limits. The shell varies from a parchment- like, flexible, scarcely calcareous cover to a hard, well-polished case. As a rule the eggs, imbedded in the ground, are hatched after a few months, but in some of the northern kinds, e.g. Hmys orbicularis, the hatching is deferred until the next spring, the embryo’s development being arrested during the winter. How such eggs, buried a few inches only below the surface, withstand the often very severe North German and Russian winter is a mystery. Whilst the plastron is generally flat, it is more or less concave in the males of many species, notably in Testudo, Cistudo, and Emys. The general conclusions which can be drawn from the present geographical distribution of the Chelonia are as few and unsatis- factory as those applying to the Crocodilia, since all the main groups of Chelonians, and many more extinct families, occurred together in bygone ages in the same countries, for instance in Europe. The marine forms are naturally cosmopolitan, but the Lestudinidae are likewise cosmopolitan, except in the Australian —- 332 _ CHELONIA . CHAP, region. The Chelydridae, now restricted to North and Central America, occurred formerly also in Europe. The Plewrodira, in Mesozoic times plentiful in Europe, India, and North America, — are now restricted to South America, Australia, and Africa; the — j = ~DERMATEMYDAE. SSIS TESTUDINIDAE. 7/// CINOSTERNIDAE. SSS cHELYDRIDAE. 2== PLATYSTERNIDAE. Fic. 70.—Geographical distribution of Cryptodirous tortoises. Pelomedusidae to Africa, Madagascar, and South America; the — Chelydidae to South America and Australia. In the latter country all the Chelonians belong to the Chelydidae. The 7riony- — choidea, occurring since the Cretaceous epoch in North America, in Early and Mid-Tertiary times in Europe, are now restricted to a == PELOMEDUSIDAE. _|IIII|| CHELYDIDAE. J Fic. 71.—Geographical distribution of Pleurodirous tortoises. North America, Asia, and Africa. The country richest in Chelo- nians is America ; North and Central America together possessing representatives of all the families except the Pleurodira, and these we know to have died out there. The Dermatemydidae, Ix GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION—ATHECAE 333 Cinosternidae, and Chelydridae are now restricted to the Nearctic sub-region (including Central America). Poorest in genera and species, all of them Chelydidae, is the Australian region, where no fossils of other families have yet been discovered. Europe, with its aes! Zz TRIONYCHIDAE. MMMM cHELYDIDAE. _ Fic. 72.—Geographical distribution of Trionychidae and Chelydidae. few Testudinidae, does not come into consideration; Asia has at least Testudinidae and Trionychidae, and in addition the solitary Platysternum in Indo-China, representative of a family whose afiinities with the Chelydridae again proclaim the validity of the Periarctic region. Order I. ATHECAE. The vertebrae and ribs are not fused with, but are free from, the carapace, which consists of numerous small polygonal plates and is covered with leathery skin without any epidermal shields. The limbs are transformed into paddles. The neck is not retrac- tile. Marine. Fam. Sphargidae.—Sphargis s. Dermatochelys coriacea, the leathery Turtle or. Luth, is the only recent species and is the largest of all recent Chelonians. The biggest specimen in the national collection is about six feet and a half long, from the nose to the end of the shell, which latter is about four feet long; such a Specimen may weigh half a ton. Agassiz, however, says that he has seen some “ weighing over a ton.” The general colour is . dark brown, either uniform or with yeliow spots. The Leathery Turtle has a wide distribution, ranging over all the inter- tropical seas, but it is rare everywhere; least so perhaps in the 334 CHELONIA CHAP. Western Atlantic from Florida to Brazil and in the Indian Ocean. According to Agassiz it breeds regularly every year in the spring on the Bahamas, on the Tortugas, and on the coast of Brazil, depositing its many eggs on the sandy shore like other turtles. Accidentally it visits the northern coast up to Long Island, and specimens, perhaps carried with the Gulf Stream, have been caught on the coasts of Europe, for instance off Dorsetshire. One was caught near Nantes in 1729, and is said to have made 4 2 Seaee. 07 Ole a MED vrhom Fic. 73.—Sphargis coriacea, the “ Leathery Turtle,” young specimens, ventral and dorsal views. x1. a terrible noise when being killed. This is perhaps the reason why Merrem in 1820 invented the generic name Sphargis, supposed to be derived from oapayéw (I make a noise). It has also been recorded from the Mediterranean. It seems to be entirely carnivorous, living upon Molluscs, Crustacea, and fish, The flesh is supposed to be unwholesome. It is a very curious fact that of this rare species only large specimens, besides a very few baby-turtles, are known or preserved in collections, while individuals of intermediate size, say from four inches to three feet in length, have never been recorded. If it were not for the fact that they are still known to breed, it would look as if the ey oD ax ATHECAE—SPHARGIDAE Los) WwW Ul species were dying out. Perhaps they are very shy, leading a pelagic life, diving at the least sign of danger, and coming near the land only for the sake of breeding. The structure of Sphargis is so peculiar in many respects that it deserves a somewhat full account. The neuro-central sutures persist on all the vertebrae. The eight cervicals are short. All the ten trunk-vertebrae carry ribs, and these, with the exception of the last, articulate between the centra and with the neural arches ; the first and tenth. ribs are short, the others are long and flattened, but not broad, with wide spaces between them. The tail is short, although it consists of about twenty vertebrae ; these are devoid of chevrons. The skull superficially resembles that of Chelone, chiefly owing to the completely roofed-in temporal region. The supraoccipital crest is rather short, covered completely by the parietals, the posterior margin of which is rounded off instead of forming, as in the Chelonidae, a long projecting triangular crest with the supra- occipital The parietals are in broad contact with the post- frontals, posteriorly they are just reached by the squamosals. The quadrato-jugal is small, separated from the post-frontal by the meeting of the squamosal with the jugal. The quadrate is notched behind, and it separates the opisthotic from the squamosal. The basisphenoid is large and broad, extending far forwards so as to separate the pterygoids widely from each other except in their anterior portions, which, instead of sending a lateral arm to the jugal and maxillary, as in Chelone, are widely separated from these bones by the palatines. The choanae le on either side of the anterior half of the vomer, and are not roofed over by ventral vomero-palatine wings. The limbs and their girdles are essentially like those of the Chelonidae, but are not derivable from them. The most re- markable feature is the shell. The dorsal and ventral halves are directly continuous, forming one unbroken case all round, which is composed of many hundreds of little bony plates, irregularly polygonal, fitting closely into each other with their sutural edges, and giving the shell a beautiful mosaic appearance. On the dorsal side are a median row and three pairs of lateral rows of larger plates, and these form seven longitudinal blunt ridges which all converge towards the triangularly pointed tail-end of the shell. The ridges are not so much produced by thickened 336 CHELONIA CHAP. or spine-like edges of the plates, but by the right and left halves of the plates being actually bent at an angle. This is most con- spicuous at the sides of the shell where it passes into the ventral portion. The latter has two pairs of lateral and one median ridge. The whole shell has consequently twelve ridges. The mosaic plates are deeply imbedded in the cutis, being externally as well as internally covered or lined with dense leathery skin. The epiderm is thin, and shows no indications of horny scales. — In young specimens the whole shell is soft and very imperfectly — ossified, later on it is quite rigid, although comparatively thin. It is nowhere in contact with the internal skeleton, except by a nuchal bone, which by a descending process articulates with the neural arch of the eighth cervical vertebra. . | The affinities of the Sphargidae and their position in the © system are still debatable. Whilst some authorities, eg. Cope, i Dollo, and Boulenger look upon Sphargis as the sole remnant of a primitive group in opposition to all the other recent Chelonia, Baur considered it the most specialised descendant of — the Chelonidae. Dames agreed with him. Van Bemmelen has modified this view in so far as he regards Sphargis as the most ; specialised Chelonian, but considers the differences between it and ] the Chelonidae great enough to conclude that both Sphargidae — and Chelonidae represent two independent, partly parallel, branches which have arisen from two different groups of terrestrial tortoises. Case,’ from the study of Protostega and — other fossil forms, tends towards Baur’s view. He _ believes that Sphargis is the culminating form of a branch which through Psephophorus and with Kosphargis has sprung from some creature like Lytoloma, which at the same time is the starting- point of another branch which culminates in the genera Thalassochelys and Chelone, while lastly a third branch contains — Protostega, Protosphargis, and Pseudosphargis. In other words, he considers them all Chelonidae. If he is right we have of course no business to separate Sphai ‘Le with its fossil allies from th rest of the Chelonia as “ Athecae.” However, Case has not proved his point. It is easy enou to understand that the characters of the cranium and _ plastron- of Sphargis are in a condition which by partial reduction can be derived from that of typical Chelonidae. The structure of the 1 Journ. Morph. xv. 1897, p. 21. IX SPHARGIDAE 337 cervical vertebrae, the absence of the marginal plates and the peculiar articulation of the nuchal with the last cervical] vertebra can be explained as convergent analogies, just like the paddles of Carettochelys. But the shell of Sphargis is fundamentally different from and not homologous with that of the others. Cope was therefore quite justified in distinguishing the Sphargidae as “ Athecae ” in opposition to the others which Dollo later on, by contrast, named “ Thecophora.” Unfortunate names, since both groups are undeniably in possession of a @«n or shell. - Both authors meant, however, by Theca the epidermal shields, but even this distinction is rendered invalid by Carettochelys. The most reasonable explanation has been suggested by Hay.! The mosaic polygonal components of the shell of Sphargis are, so to speak, an earlier generation of osteodermal plates than the later generation of longer and broader bony plates which in the Thecophora come into contact, and fuse with, the neural arches and ribs. The osteoderms of Sphargis belong to the same category as the dermal ossifications in the scutes of Crocodilia, whilst the plates of the carapace and plastron of the Thecophora belong to the category of the abdominal ribs. Sphargis has the first kind in its peculiar shell, the second kind in the deeper lying plastron and in its neural plate. But it has lost, or perhaps had never developed, the horny shields. The only difficulty is, however, the presence of a plastron and of a typical neural plate in Sphargis. This difficulty is not very serious. The plastron is a very old institution. It occurs together with the more superficial osteoderms in Caiman, and the nuchal plate may be the oldest of all dorsals. We can scarcely imagine that the direct ancestors of Sphargis had developed both kinds of shells, and that comparatively recently the inner shell of the Carapace was lost, leaving only the nuchal plate. Fossils do not Support such an assumption. Undoubted ancestral forms of Sphargis axe very rare. Psephophorus of the Oligocene and Mio- cene of Europe had a continuous mosaic shell much resembling that of Sphargis: Hosphargis is represented by a well-preserved skull from the London clay. Then follows a wide gap until we come to Psephoderma of the Rhaetic, or Upper Trias of Bavaria ; the large fragment of whose dorsal shell is composed of about 200 Mosaic pieces. If this fragment really formed part of the shell * Amer, Natural. xxxii. 1898, p- 929. VOL. VIII Z 338 CHELONIA CHAP, of a Chelonian, its age would speak greatly in favour of the q Athecae being a very primitive and independent group. Order II. THECOPHORA. Thoracic vertebrae and ribs united with a series of median or neural and a paired series of lateral or costal plates. Parietals prolonged downwards, meeting the pterygoids directly or by inter- position of an epipterygoid. } Sub-Order 1. Cryptodira.—7Zhe carapace is covered with horny shields. The neck, if retractile, bends in an 8-shaped curve in a. vertical plane. The pelvis is not fused with the shell. Fam. 1. Chelydridae.—The plastron is small and cross-shaped (Fig. 61,2, p. 315); the bridge is very narrow, and the displaced abdominal shields are widely separated from the marginals by a few irregularly shaped inframarginals. The tail is long. The limbs, neck, and head are so stout that they cannot be completely withdrawn into the shell. Snout with a powerful hooked beak. American; only two genera, each with one species. The temporal region is roofed very incompletely and only anteriorly by the expanded parietals and postfrontals, which form a long suture. The plastron consists of nine bony plates, a small entoplastron being present; there are lacunae in the middle line, the plates meeting imperfectly, and the horny abdominal shields — are likewise separated by soft skin. The carapace has a nuchal with long rib-like processes which underlie the marginals; the neural plates form a continuous series. There are twenty-three marginal plates.) The pubic and ischiadic symphyses remain separate, enclosing one large heart-shaped foramen. The five fingers and toes are webbed and are protected by claws except the outer toe, the nail of which is usually suppressed. Chelydia serpentina, the Snapping Turtle, attains a large size, namely, a shell-length of more than one foot, and a total “length from the nose to the tip of the tail of more than three feet Its range extends from the Canadian lakes east of the Rocky — Mountains, through the United States and Central America. The carapace of young specimens has three very marked series of keels, which gradually disappear with age, until in very old individuals the shell becomes quite smooth. The skin is very warty, especially on the neck, and there is a pair of minui IX THECOPHORA—CRY PTODIRA—-CHELYDRIDAE 339 barbels on the chin. The tail carries three series of originally triangular horny crests, which with age are transformed into blunt knobs. The general colour of this rather ugly creature is olive, mottled with dark brown above and with yellowish below. According to Holbrook the Snapping Turtle is found in stagnant pools, or in streams Where the waters are of sluggish motion. Generally they prefer deep water, and live at the bottom of rivers; at times, however, they approach the surface, above. which they elevate the tip of their pointed snout, all other parts being concealed; and in this way they float slowly with the current, but if disturbed they descend speedily to the bottom. They are extremely voracious, feeding on fish, reptiles, or any animal substance that falls in their way. They take the hook readily, whatever may be the bait, though most attracted by pieces of fish; in this way many are caught for the market. It is, however, necessary to have strong hooks and tackle, otherwise they would be broken, for the animal puts forth great strength in his struggles to escape, both with his firm jaws and by bring- ing his anterior extremities across the line. When caught they always give out an odour of musk, which in very old animals is sometimes disagreeably strong. Occasionally the Snapping Turtle leaves the water, and is seen on the banks of rivers or in meadows, even at a distance from its accustomed element. On land his motions are awkward; he walks slowly, with his head, neck, and long tail extended, elevating himself on his legs lke the Alligator, which at that time he greatly resembles in his motions; like the Alligator also, after having walked a short distance, he falls down to rest for a few moments, and then proceeds on his journey. In captivity they prefer dark places, and are exceedingly ferocious : they will seize upon and bite severely anything that is offered them, and their grasp upon the object with their strong jaws is most tenacious. The Snapping Turtles, or “Snappers,” are feared on account of the ferocious bites which they inflict, and they are hated because of the destruction of valuable fish and water-fowl. They in turn atone for this damage by being eaten, especially the . younger half-grown individuals, the flesh of the older ones being too much tainted with the odour of musk. The round eggs, which are laid to the number of twenty to thirty in the summer 340 CHELONIA CHAP. (in the Northern States about June), are likewise good to eat. The first act of the young creature on Jeaving the shell is said to be snapping and biting. In captivity they are often very sulky, and refuse food stubbornly for many months, perhaps for a whole year, and apparently without much harm to themselves, since they lie quietly in the distant corner of the tank, now and then slowly rising to the surface to breathe. Fresh-water algae grow on the shell and in the mud which settles on it, and since this == ——sP = > SSESESpSHHSSSSQqy —