Gy, Gh “iby Lge Dg eee gaye Diy Mi OTE IEG Us iy bey Ye Ys, YY UY in 2009 with funding from - Digitized by the Internet Archive 2 & AYhe © ah , i © es Pe rae ‘= Fi N, A. ’ ~~ ‘ ‘ THE CANADIAN HNTOMOLOGIST. ~Qdited by the Rev. C, I. 8S. Kethune, M. A, Head Master of Trinity College School, Port Hope, Ont. ASSISTED BY W. SAUNDERS, London, Ont. : | E. B. REED, Barrister-at-Law, London, Ont.; and J. M, DENTON, Lnndon, Ont. LONDON : PRINTED BY THE FREE PRESS STEAM PRINTING COMPANY, RICHMOND ST. 1872 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS VOLUME. ANDREWS, W. V.. Protos Aicb Pots «3 hee cE MAURER BELL, PROF. J. J.. ah .. BELLEVILLE, ONT. BETHUNE, REV. C. 7 S., ‘The ide, .Port Hope, Ont. BOWLES, J. G.. seer ae pe AE P. CAULFIELD, F, B. otek ON aoe eg MONTREAL EN CHAMBERS, V. T : So. autos a ois, OORING TON. is Ws CLEMENTI, REV. v., B ‘en .......NoORTH Douro, ONT. Mee WM. .3.. ck ....). 2. ess Mowrmear, PO: eee Dy et us ce. ced. fas» i BILADELPBIA, PA. Meee PROP. TH. Hi.) .. 026.3. ca vs Y TORONTO, ONT. Meter CHAS. Re: nu. 5-5 vy 24s 4 te os WASHINGTON, .D,-C- SINE ys he os se me he es yee es ORO, EME: Seen. We... 6. f 5. ek 64) ess 2 > }COALBURGH, W. VA. MeL Gy) Ri oo... o-. . e eee w to + DEMOPOLIS, ALA Peer WMOR. 2.2... 2s... oe... ForsyTH, Mo. mea THEODORE L.:....5..5..-..2 .0°-.New. YORK. MINOT, C. S.. & fk Spa See ee OSTON, MLASS: MURTFELDT, MARY E.. el & sa da os IRE WOOD,ST. Lovis, Mo. Pist Lit, j.. be eeeteeisceensee esses GRIMSBY, ONT REED, E. B.. ATT ede nes Soke Stas 5 SOON, CONE. RILEY, PROF. C. V.. 4 ne EA eed ERE IOI ES, 5 Cy, ey i ty oe Kiera ONT. PEE, Weeds fs ius ek. dabva a 22% 2 ee suONDON, ONT. eee te SE ks fe Li oe... i In the fall of 1854, he removed with his family to Prescott, where he was appointed General Agent of the Bytown & Prescott Railway. He subsequently, and up to within a short time of his death, held other offices in connection with the same Company. He remained in Prescott until the spring of 1863, when he returned to Ottawa, where he afterward permanently resided. It was while living in Prescott that he began, sys- tematically, the study of Botany and Entomology. These continued to be his favourite branches, although he also gave some attention to Geology and Mineralogy. Mr. Billings’ Botanical collection, which pretty thoroughly exhausted the field around Prescott and Ottawa, consisted of 1897 species, and ‘ embraced about one half of the entire number contained in Gray’s Manual. It is‘now the property of the Ottawa Scientific and Literary Society. His collection of Entomological specimens was also extensive and valuable. Besides contributing to the Smithsonian Institute of Washington, and to various private collections, he presented a large assortment of Coleoptera and Lepidoptera to the Literary and Scientific Society of Ottawa. Considering the very limited opportunities at his disposal, it is surprising that he was able to accomplish so much ashe did. His close and unremitting attention to his office duties might have } been supposed to discourage him in the prosecution of his favorite re- searches. But such was not the case. When the day’s work was over, it was to him always a source of the highest enjoyment to get away into- the country, and hold converse with Nature. He loved not merely the flowers, he also enjoyed the haunts where they are to be found. By the lonely river-bank “*He lingered many summer hours, Deep in the olden forests he sought the sweet wild flowers.” In later years his attention was mainly directed to Entomology, and to it he devoted every spare hour that chance threw in his way. He was often to be met with, net in hand, in out-of-the-way places, following his THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. | 73 25) congenial work, and woe betide the heedless buzzing beetle that crossed ‘a his path. tie ____ Among his contributions to various scientific periodicals may be men- _ tioned the following :—In the Canadian Naturalist of Feburary, 1858, and February, 1860, he published a “ List of Plants found growing in the Neighbourhood of Prescott.” To the annals of the Botanical Society of Kingston, he furnished a “List of Plants growing principally within 4 miles of Prescott, and on Laurentian Rocks west of Brockville, 72 species.” Im the transactions of the Ottawa Natural History Society, he published eS a “List of Plants collected in the vicinity of Ottawa during the season of 1866, consisting of 405 species.” Occasional papers also from his pen -* may be found in the Canapian Entomococist. In Vol. 1, pages 28 and _ 60, he discussed the subject “Ona station for Afe/itea Phaeton,” and in the same volume, page 45, is a paper on “ Diurnal Lepidoptera observed in the neighbourhood of Ottawa during the season of 1868.” Whether this comprises all that he wrote for the ENTOMOLOGIST we are not in a position to say. Writing scientific articles was a kind of amusement he did not much relish, and but for the importunities of his friends, even the few above mentioned might not have been penned. That Mr. Billings had made for himself a substantial reputation as a Naturalist, is shown by the fact that he was elected to positions of honor | by several scientific societies, as a recognition of the valuable services rendered by him to the cause of Natural History. He was the first President of the Ottawa Natural History Society in 1864. In 1866 he } was elected one of the Vice-Presidents of the Entomological Society of _» Canada. When the Royal Botanical Society of Canada was organized, he was one of the original Fellows. He was also a corresponding member of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, and of the Portland Society _ __ of Natural History. ‘ Mr. Billings died at the comparatively early age of 53, on the 29th of 4 _ September last, deeply regretted by a large circle of warmly attached friends. —COMMUNICATED. ABBOTT'S NOTES ON GEORGIAN BUTTERFLIES. BY SAMUEL H. SCUDDER, BOSTON, MASS. ce. A few months ago, I spent some time over the rich collection of _ drawings by Abbott, now in the British Museum. Thinking that some of his memoranda may not be unacceptable to the readers of your maga- 74 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. zine, I transcribe the substance of what is written on those butterflies which occur in the North as well as in the South, no copy of the others having been taken. The botanical names of the plants have, in most cases, been inserted in the MSS. by’ some subsequent student; those which bear the initials A.W.C., are due to the kindness of Dr. Chapman. The drawings of the butterflies are contained in the 6th and the 16th volumes of the series of Abbott’s MSS., the former comprising the perfect insects only, tle latter the earlier stages as well. In this article the sequence of the MSS. is followed. The Roman characters refer to the folios, the Arabic to the figures. Names repeated in the two volumes are prefixed by an asterisk. , VOLUME VI. *T., 1.—G/aucus ; not common. *III., 7—8.—TZrotlus. Taken March 10; changed to chrysalis Oct. 13 ; bred March 1o ; bred again in summer ; common. *V., 10—11.—Asterias. Chrysalis April 20, imago May 2. VI., 12—13.—Philenor. Common on pium and peach blossoms in the Spring; caterpillar pink-brown ; feeds on black snake root ( Aristolo- chia serpentaria, A.W.C.); chrysalis April 26, gave imago May 4; chrysalis June 21, gave imago July 5. *X., 14-—15.—Ayjax. Flies very swift ; chrysalis May 24, gave imago June 16; chrysalis in Autumn, gave imago March 2. XI., 60—61.—£ubule. Caterpillar yellow, streaked and spotted with blue ; chrysalis August 31, gave imago Sept. 10; chrysalis Sept. 24, gave imago Oct. 6; flies very swift. XIII., 64—5.—PAilodice. Taken May 10; rare ; common in Virginia. XIV., 8:—Philodice (pale ¢ ): Taken March 12; very rare. *XV., 66—8.—icippe. Taken Aug. 7; not common. XVIL., 69—71.—Zisa. Taken Aug. 20; common; frequents and sucks damp ground in yards, etc. XIX., 77-—8.—Protodice. ‘Taken May 13; very rare. XX., 79—81.—Genutia. ‘Taken May 21; very rare in oak woods. *XXI., 18—19.—Archippus. Chrysalis April 25, gave imago May 11; not very common ; flies very swift. _ *XXIII., 22—3.—-M/issipus ; not common. XXIV., 48—9.—Alope. Not common. XXV., 52—3.—Zurytris. Common; taken April 14. XXVIL, 54—s5.—Areolatus. Taken June 5; in oak and pine woods, on the, sides of the branches of trees; common; caterpillar green, and feeds on grass. ad THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 75 - *XXIX., 28—9.—Huntera. Feeds on everlasting (Guaphalium fpolycep- halum, A.W.C.) spinning the blossoms together for its retreat ; chrysalis April 26, gave imago May 8; chrysalis May 7, gave imago May 16; not very common. *XXX., 30—1.—Cenia. Chrysalis April 18, gave imago May 4; a second brood in the Autumn ; common. *XXXI., 36—7.—C/audia. Feeds on May-apples (Podophyl/um pelta- tum, A.W.C.) ; taken April 24; breeds again in Autumn ; frequents fields near swamps ; not very cOmmon. XXXII., 7.—/da/ia. Met with by Mr. Elliot in his journey to the _ mountains. XXXII. 43—4.—Clyton. Taken May 1 in neighbourhood of swamps ,; second brood taken September 5, in Ogechee and Savannah River swamps ; rare. XXXIII., 45—7.—Celtis. Taken May 1; very rare ; also in swamps. XXXIV., 50o—51.—Fortlandia. April 25.; not very common. *XXXV., 16.—Ursula. Feeds on willow, wild gooseberry, and wild cherry ; chrysalis June 9; others were bred as early as April 12 ; not very common ; frequents swamps. *XXXVIL., 24—5.—Antiopa. One year I met with a brood of these caterpillars on a willow, in number near 300; chrysalis April 24, gave imago May 24. XXXIX., 9.— Faunus. Met with by Mr. Elliot in his tour to the mountains. XL., 32 —3.— Bachmanii. Frequents blossoms in fields adjoining swamps ; not common. MLIII, 38—40.—Fhareos. Taken March 5 ; common. *L., 162—4.—Calanus. Taken May 2; common in oak woods ; cater- pillar greenish-brown, with darker green marks; imago bred April 29. *LL., 165—7.—-strigosa. Feeds on holly and oak; tyed itself up April 27, changed to chrysalis 2oth [29?], bred May 6; frequents oak fields and swamps. *LV., 173—5.—-niphon. March 29; very rare; near swamps and oak woods. LVI., 176—8.—mopsus. May 25; oak woods ; very rare. LVIII., 13.— Americana. ‘Taken by Mr. Elliot in his tour to the mountains. *LXVI., 86—7.—7ityrus. Spun up in leaves Sept. 5, chrysalis Sept. 7, bred April 10; not very common. 76 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. *LXVII., 88—9.—Lycidas. Feeds on beggar’s lice (Desmodium, A.W.C.); ~~ chrysalis July 10, gave imago July 23; taken fresn-bred as early as { April 12; frequents swamps, hommocks, and oak woods ; not very common. ; LXVIII., 907—91.—Profeus. Feeds on wild pea-vine (C/itoria mariana, — A.W.C.), and kidney beans ; spun up July 2, chrysalis July 4, bred August 18; in some years found frequently in oak woods and fields near swamps. : ; *LXX., 94—5.—Bathvllus. Spun up June 11, bred June 24; common. *LXXII., 96—-8.—‘Fuvenalis. Bred March 8; common. *LXXIV., 43.— mark. The Aphides of that region must have a long continuance of the _ egs state; in England this state varies from one month to eight months, 3 according to the species, and according to the weather. The length and season of the egg state in the Aphides of hot countries has not yet been observed, and is an interesting subject for enquiry.—/rancs Walker, in Newiian’s Entomologist. MoNOHAMMUS MARMORATOR, KAiréy.—I was so fortunate as fo | | receive a specitfen of this rare insect from a friend last summer. It was ~ So taken in Richmond Square, Montreal, on the 27th of July, 1871. Length . of body one inch. The markings agree perfectly with Kirby’s description, but as the antennae of his specimen were broken off, I will deseribe those of mine. Antennae a little longer than the body, first jomt chocolate brown at the base, remainder grey, through which the brown appears in spots and streaks ; second joint the same; third joint grey at the base, deepening into warm brown at the end ; fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth redder brown, grey only showing a little at the base ; remaining joints deep red. This is the only specimen I have got. There is another in the collection of the Natural History Society of Montreal, and Mr. Couper informs me that it was included in his Quebec List. Preris Rap#£.—This destructive butterfly was very abundant about Montreal in 1870, and ruined the cabbage gardens around the city. Last summer they were not nearly so plentiful, and this coming season I hope to see their ranks still thinner, as a good many of the chrysalids that I examined this spring contained parasites in the pupa state.-—F. B. Caut- FIELD, Montreal, P.Q. COLEOPTERA TAKEN AT GRIMSBY. Cicindeda lecontei, one specimen, June 2nd. Ovmophron tesselatum. Elaphrus clairville: Kirby—politus Lec. Dr. Horn informs me that the specimen heretofore regarded by Leconte as Clairvillei, is undescribed. Biethisa quadricollis, a specimen taken May 23rd. Lachnocrepis parallelus, two, taken in the lake June 1st. Stenolophus carus, about the roots of trees in the swamp, May 13th. Tachys tripunctatus, under stones near water. Flaliplus fasciatus. Hydroporus striatopunciatus. Agabus acuductus. Colymbetis ( Scutopterus ) coriaceus, Hcffm. Taken June rst. a Jongulus, a specimen taken also in the lake June oth. Hydaticus bimarginatus. H. piceus. H. liberus. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 99 Ochthebius nitidus. Sperchopsis tesselatus. Clambus puberulus. Adranes lecontei, four specimens taken in a nest of yellow ants, May 11th. Ceophyllus monilis, taken in nests of yellow ants from 25th April to middle of May. Pselaphus erichsonit. Tychus longipalpus. Batrisus nigricans, B. globosus, taken with other sp. of Pse/aphide under leaves in the swamp. April. Flomalota lividipennis, Aleochara nitida, A. lata, A. rubripennis, Tachy- porus, brunneus, Bryoporus rufescens, Mycetoporus americanus, Acyloph- orus pronus, Euryporus puncticollis, Philonthus sparsus, P. micans, P. sobrinus, P. terminalis, P. paederoides, Diochus Schaumii, Lathrobium puncticolle, L. rufulum, Scopaeus exiguus, Stenus stygicus, S. flavicoruts, S. annularis, S. arculus, Lathrimacum sordidum, 1 -rognatha punctata. Paromalus seminulum. Baocera apicalis. _Limulodes paradoxus. A specimen of this curious little Z7richoplerygide occurred in the before-mentioned nest of yellow ants with Adranes and Ceophyllus, making two blind species found in the same nest. Prometopia sexmaculata, Trogosita marginata, Sylvanus advena, Antherop- hagus convexulus. Crypiophagus cellaris. Taken in a nest of Humble bees. Corticaria rugulosa C. picta, Psephenus lecontet, a specimen bred from a larva taken in the creek at Grimsby. Canthon nigricornis, a dead specimen found on the lake shore June zgth. Cremastochilus Harrisii, also taken on the lake shore. Agrilus cephalicus, A. egenus, Cardiophorus cardisce, Athous discaleratus. [.pPEPrre: Book Norice.—We have just received the first number of a new work on “ Indigenous and Exotic Lepidoptera,” (Rhopaloceres, Heteroceres), by Mr. Herman Strecker, of Reading, Pa., U.S. The work is well got up in quarto edition, with colored illustrations by Mr. Strecker himself. It is to be published monthly at 50 cents a number, and we recommend it to the careful attention of our entomologists. We shall refer again to this book in our next issue. | ADVERTISEMENTS. Exotic LepIpoPpTERA AND CoLeoPpTEeRaA.—TI have a large collection of specimens of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera from Australia, Manilla, Mexico, and Central America, which I am now arranging for the purpose of sale, as I intend confining myself to Californian insects for the future. I will not exclude from the offered sale my numerous Californian specimens. 1 100 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. will continue to collect in all branches of the Californian entomological fauna, and I invite exchange. I have also a complete set of the Pacific Railroad Survey Reports (13 volumes), in excellent condition, which I shall be glad to dispose of. Apply to James BEHRENS, San Francisco; California. PLATYSAMIA CoL_uMBIA.—I will give in exchange for a good example of this moth one hundred ‘specimens of Lefzdoptera of various genera from California, Southern and Atlantic United States, S. America, Europe, East Indian Archipelago, &c., or double the number for two examples ; or, if it is preferable, I will pay in money. HERMAN STRECKER, Box 411, ; Reading P. O., Berks Cy., Pa. U.S. Corx.—We have a good supply of sheet cork of the ordinary thick ness, price 16 cents (gold) per square foot. CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, Vols. 1. 2 and 3.—We have a few copies left of Vols. 1 and 2, No. 1, of Vol. 1, being, however, out of print. Price $1.25 for Vols. 1 and 2; $1 Vol. 3. List oF CANADIAN COLEOPTERA.—Price 15 cents each, embracing 55 families, 432 genera, and 1231 species. (For labelling cabinets). PRINTED NUMBERS, in sheets, 1 to 2000, for labelling cabinets. Price ro cents each set. Pins.—We have still a supply of Nos. 3, 5 and 6 left. A large quan- tity have been ordered, and are shortly expected. The prices in future will be slightly raised. The present stock will be sold at 75c. (gold) per packet of soo. These prices are exclusive of cost of transportation, and orders wil please state whether the package is to be sent by mail or express. Norice.—The following scale for advertisements has been decided upon by the Editors :— Whole page on cover or fly-sheet .......$5.00 per annum. SD J Half i - % - SDs ings aR = Quarter “ « as ‘ Ree ee ry For body of the Magazine, the rates to be 5 cts. per line for first insertion, and 3 cts. for every subsequent one. AGENTS FOR THE ENTOMOLOGIST. Canapa.—E. B. Reed, London, Ont.; W. Couper, Naturalist, Montreal P.Q.; G. J. Bowles, Quebec, P. Q.; J. Johnston, Canadian Institute, Toronto, Ont. Unirep Sratrs.—The American Naturalist’s Book Agency, Salem, Mass.; J. Y. Green, Newport, Vt.; W. V. Andrews, Room 17, No. 137 Broadway, New York. 7 P 4 4 . Ge Canad Entomol VOL. IV. LONDON, ONT., JUNE, 1872. No. 6 DESCRIPTIONS OF LEPIDOPTERA FROM ALABAMA. BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS, ALABAMA. Nematocampa expunctaria, Grote. ¢.—Pale ochreous, stained, and the veins lined with a more intense shade. Transverse anterior line arcuate, dark ochreous, continued. Median shade arcuate at disc, thence running straightly downward approximate to the transverse posterior line, continued. Transverse posterior line dark ochreous, even, distinct, slightly inwardly sinuate below vein 2. No vinous shadings whatever. ' Secondaries concolorous, with primaries ; a single even median line cor- responding with the transverse posterior line of primaries. Beneath paler, whitish ; secondaries immaculate ; primaries with traces of trans- verse posterior line superiorly, and a sprinkling of ochreous scales about the costal region. Body parts concolorous with wings. Lxpamse 23 m.m. Outline and ornamentation of V. f/amentaria, but differing by the absence of any purplish stains, the more intense color and denser’ squa- mation, and quite prominently by the different shape of the transverse posterior line, which is less even in VV. ft/amentaria, and runs sooner and more deeply inwardly, attaining the internal margin further from the angle “than in JV. expunctaria. The course of the median shade differs also; this more nearly attains the transverse posterior line on disc, and again on submedian interspace. ‘This latter inflection is entirely wanting in JV. expunctaria, which seems a little the larger species. Conchylis Robinsonana, Grote. ¢.—Primaries blackish fuscous with five silvery white maculations above. The first is ovate, free from the base, well sized, touching internal margin, not attaining costal edge. The - second is parallel, outwardly exserted inferiorly. Before the apices are two nearly similar sized moderate spots, and the fifth is larger and covers internal angle. Hind wings pale fuscous. Collar fuscous white; the thorax is white above. Caputal squamation pale, while the abdomen is pale fuscous. Expanse 14 m.m. Size of C. 5-maculana Rob., and resem- bling that species, but differing in the relative size and position of the spots on the primaries, notably the basal one and that covering internal angle. 102 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. I name this little species after my friend and brother entomologist, the late Coleman T. Robinson, whose sudden death has caused so great sorrow in many circles, besides the one in which I knew him best. Who shall say now that he wasted his time in describing the little insects he loved, when it is his descriptions of new species of North American Moths that will keep his fame after death, and, in the nature of human things, long after his other qualities shall have been forgotten by men? So many are now properly sorrowing for him—I have only to remember this and be silent. NOTES, ON PIERIS RAPE. BY G. J. BOWLES, MONTREAL. The April number of the ENToMOLoGIST contains a communication from my esteemed friend Mr. S. H. Scudder, with reference to the yellow male variety of this species. In it he asks several questions which I shall endeavour to answer, adding some other particulars to make my notes as complete as possible. I think that entomologists will agree with me in considering P. rape as one of the most interesting insects existing on this continent, not only with reference to its destructive habits, but also on account of its recent introduction and rapid dissemination over the country. The Colorado Potato Beetle is, perhaps, the only species whose progress has been so carefully recorded ; for both have “made their mark” as they spread from: place to place, although the butterfly has not been such a formidable enemy as the beetle. A new subject of interest—the yellow male variety —is now added to the history of the butterfly, and it is certainly worthy of the attention of students, as it may, in the future, aid in solving some of the problems connected with climatic influences and the distinction of species. I first met with yellow males in 1863, and mentioned it in my paper on Preris rape published in the Canadian Naturalist for August, 1864. Since then I have captured similar specimens each year, and found them to be produced throughout the season. I remember taking one or two so early in the spring that I felt satisfied they belonged to the very first brood of the year, which led me to conclude that the yariety is likely to appear at aJl parts of the season, and in every brood. Those which I captured on the wing have always been males, but, strange to tell, among 4 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 103 ‘a number reared in confinement during the summer of 1864, a yellow — Jemale made her appearance, smaller than usual, but of as dark a colour as any that I have seen of the other sex. It may happen, therefore, that the variety may become a permanent one, and, at some future time, be regarded as a distinct species. Who knows how soon favorable circum- stances may develope a new (and yellow) species of Pieris, to be called novangle or canadensis ? We cannot, however, claim this variety as the effect of a change of habitat and climate on P. rafe@, as (with all due deference to Mr.Stainton) it has been met with in England. Curtis, in his work on “ Farm Insects,” (quoted in my paper before referred to), speaks of having in his collection a male P. rape “taken near Oldham, in Lancashire, which has all the wings of a bright yellow colour.” From Mr. Stainton’s assurance to Mr. Scudder, however, that it-was unknown in Europe, its occurrence on that continent must be extremely rare; very different from Canada, and especially the neighbourhood of Quebec, where I should say that,at a low estimate, one male ?. vafz out of five hundred is of a yellow colour, more or less intense. This estimate would allow for many specimens in a season, as, of all Quebec butterflies, our friend is decidedly the most abundant and prolific. I have seen them by hundreds, at one time, hovering over the fields of cabbages, to the dismay of the cultivators of this useful vegetable. It is curious that this variety should be comparatively common in America, and almost unknown in Europe. The fact would lead us to think that though it cannot have originated here, yet the tendency to diverge from the normal colour of the species has been increased by the transfer to this continent. The Canadian Picris rape (and, I expect, the New England as well), is, in common with some other species of the genus, subject to great variation in colour and intensity of markings, apart from the yellow variety under consideration. The spring brood is of a much purer white than those produced later in the season, and has the blackish markings less in size and paler in colour. I have often seen spring males without the spot on the upper side of the fore wings, and having the blotch on the apex so mtich obliterated, that I have supposed them, before examination, to be P. oleracea. The spot, however, is generally present beneath, and can be faintly seen through the wing. As the summer passes, the mark- ings of the successive broods become more intense, until in the autumn, individuals (particularly females), are met with which have a greyish appearance, from the number of black scales sprinkled on the wings, 104 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. especially near the body. ‘The illustrations on page 83 of the Report of our Society for 1871, published by the Ontario Department of Agriculture, give an exact idea of the insect at this season. ‘This change in colour has been noticed in England ; indeed, before its progressiveness had been observed, an eminent entomologist there separated the spring and autumn broods into distinct species. I quote from a letter received in 1864 from my friend Dr. Jordan, of Birmingham :— “You are probably aware that here in England we have two distinet broods of the insect, the first appearing in April, the second in July. The first almost wants the apical spot on the top wing in both sexes, and on the male the central spot is often also quite obliterated. To this the name of P. metra was given by Stephens, who then supposed it a distinct species. In the autumnal brood, or typical P. rape, we have a larger and darker insect, with the spots more marked, and the black patch at the apex of the fore wing very much darker.” The yellow variety also shares. in this progressive change of colour. The spring specimens are of a very delicate yellow, almost without spots, and are very handsome, while those appearing in the fall are of a sulphur yellow, and heavily marked. Dr. Jordan speaks of there being two broods of the insect in England. I think that in Canada they are more numerous. It is impossible, how- ever, to settle the number with certainty, as one brood encroaches on the next ; and from the time when the butterflies begin to deposit their eggs on cabbage plants in the hot-beds, in April and May, until October, larvae of all sizes and ages may be found feeding on the same plant. The short time required for the complete developement of the insect also favours the _idea of there being three or more broods in one season. Some caterpillars reared by me in June, 1864, grew from one-twelfth of an inch in length to their full size, in eleven days; they then became pupz, and seven days afterwards, the perfect insects were produced. Allowing for the influence of temperature in accelerating or retarding their changes, thirty days would be a fair average to give as the duration of each brood, and this would be equal to four or five broods in the season in the latitude of Quebec. In fact, there is no other way of accounting for their surprising numbers in the latter part of summer. I have not yet met with any parasite infesting this butterfly, though I have found pupe which had apparently been destroyed by them; and a fellow-student here (Mr. Caulfield) informs me that he now has about twenty chrysalids containihg some insect enemy. The most powerful 7 ae re THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 105 agent in lessening their numbers is, in my opinion, the intense cold of ‘winter, for, contrary to the rule with regard to insects passing the winter in the pupal state, the chrysalis of P. age, unless placed in a sheltered situa- tion, does not seem to resist the effects of frost. In early spring, I have searched under the exposed coping-boards of fences, where these pup were suspended in scores, and very rarely found one alive; nearly all were killed and blackened by the severe cold, and any living ones brought into the house invariably died in a few days. ‘The first brood of the year is, with regard to numbers, in wonderful contrast to the multitudes of larvee which must have come to maturity and pupated during the preceding autumn, and this difference can only be ascribed to the destroying effects of the winter’s cold upon the chrysalids. The species, in its new habitat, certainly has to pass through extremes of temperature which it has not been accustomed to in England—from which country it was most probably introduced ; and while the increased summer heat of Canada appears to have made it more prolific, by augmenting the number of broods, the greater cold of winter has balanced the account by killing off the surplus, which otherwise would have rendered the insect an intolerable pest. The ‘‘compensating” principle in the laws of Nature is thus in useful operation with regard to ?. rape, and as the power of cold decreases in effectiveness through the butterfly becoming acclimatized (which will probably happen in course of time), no doubt other agencies will arise in the shape of new parasitic enemies, to keep the species within due bounds. It would be interesting to know how far this insect has now extended its range, particularly towards the west of Canada. The prediction I made in 1864 has been fully verified, as it has now spread over the Province of Quebec and the New England States ; and last year destroyed $500,000 worth of cabbages in the vicinity of New York alone, according to the estimate of a leading newspaper there. It does not seem, however, to have made equal progress in Ontario. Could not our Kingston friends give us some information on this point? It would be “ thankfully ' received and faithfully applied.” THE ENToMOLoGICAL Report for 1871 has now been issued, and, we trust, is by this time in the hands of all our members. Should any fail to receive it, the Secretary will forward a copy on being notified. 106 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. _MICRO-LEPIDOPTERA.. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KY. Continued from page 92. DEPRESSARIA. 5. D. Rileyadla. N. sp. Brush dark brown, apical joint pale yellowish. Head, thorax, and fore wings pale yellow, faintly tinged with pink, and minutely dusted with fuscous, and with a fuscous streak on the base of the costa. Head and — thorax slightly iridescent, wings scarcely so ; posterior wings a little paler. Under surface and legs pale yellowish, sparsely dusted with fuscous. © Alar ex. ¥g inch. Named for Mr. C. V. Riley, State Entomologist of Missouri. Kentucky. Larva unknown. Also in the collection of Mr. Wm. Saunders, London, Ont. 6. D. fuscoochrella. NN. sp. Palpi white, flecked with fuscous ; third joint fuscous, mixed above with whitish. Head pale whitish-yellow, flecked with pale fuscous, strongly iridescent. Antennz pale yellowish, annulate with fuscous, and basal joint fuscous. Thorax and anterior wings pale ochreous, the wings suffused- with fuscous at the base. A large oblique fuscous spot on the costa at about the basal fourth, reaching the fold, mixed next the costa about equally with pale cchreous. Anteriorly, this spot is distinetly outlined, but posteriorly, it passes gradually into pale ochreous, thickly dusted with fuscous, occupying the costal half of the wing, and spreading _ over the apical fourth of the wing, becoming darker towards the apex. Ciliz silvery. Posterior wings and ciliz grayish-silvery. Adar. ex. *: inch. The prevailing tint of the basal costal portion of the wing is fuscous. Kentucky. Larva unknown. 7. D. fuscoluteella. N. sp. Palpi dark purplish-brown. Head bronzed, purplish. Antenne pale fuscous and yellowish. Thorax and anterior wings pale fawn colour, with a silky lustre (under the lens pale yellowish, overlaid with fuscous). Posterior wings paler. Body yellowish, thickly dusted with brown, and with purplish reflections. A/ar ex. ts inch. Kentucky. Larva unknown. 8. D. obscurusella. iN. sp. Palpi and antennz dark brown, the palpi with a little ochreous inter- mixed, and with the second joint ochreous on the inner surface; face pale ochreous, sparsely flecked with pale fuscous; thorax and anterior a : oy ) 7 Be THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 107 > c tte ae wings dark brown, mixed almost equally with ochreous, and with a few scattered white scales. In some parts of the wings the dark brown scales "are condensed into irregular, wavy, rather indistinct lines or narrow Boy: bands, one of which is placed at about the basal one-fourth of the costa, and is oblique and furcate, sending one of the branches nearly to the end of the disc ; at about the apical one-third they are again condensed into an indistinct zigzag line across the wing, and again into a brown irregular patch at the apex. Sometimes in fresh specimens these zigzag lines and. Spots in the apical part of the wing appear to be continuous ; but they are indistinct, and when the wing is a little rubbed, they appear as very indis- tinct separate lines or spots. Cilia dark fulvous, sprinkled with dark brown ; posterior wings pale grayish fuscous, becoming darker towards the i. Alar ex. ¥ inch. Kentucky. Larva unknown. Also in the collection of Mr. Wm. Saunders, London, Ont. é 9. D. pseudacaciella. N. sp. _ Antenne and palpi dark purplish-brown, streaked and flecked with white. Head clothed with dark brown and white scales about equally, tinged with pale purplish. Thorax and anterior wings dark purplish- brown, streaked and flecked with white and ochreous especially ; a streak extending from the base nearly to the apex, just within the costal margin of which the prevailing hue is ochreous, mixed with white. A white costal spot at the beginning of the costal ciliez, and an opposite dorsal one, both small. Ciliz grayish silvery, with a rather distinct and wide hinder marginal line at their base dark brown. Hind wings pale ochreous- brown. Body and legs dark purplish-brown, with a nearly equal inter- 8 mixture of white scales. A/ar ex. nearly $ inch. Very common in Kentucky. Dr. Packard. (Guide, p. 349) mentions another species, D. robiniella, which seems to be very distinct from this, but which, like this, feeds upon _ the leaves of the Locust (Robinia pseudacacia). The larva of this species, when young, inhabits the mines of Lithocolletis robiniella, Clem., and L. ornatella, Mihi, in the leaves of R. pseudacacia and R. hispida. When older, it sews together the leaflets, and lives between them. I once saw _ one cut its way into the mines of Z. robiniella, proving thus that its _ frequent presence in those mine’ was not owing to its having accidentally _ wandered into torn mines. The young larva is green, with darker green longitudinal markings, with the head and next segment shining black, and mouth ferruginous. 108 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. When older, it becomes pale green, with two dark brown longitudinal stripes on top of the third and following segments, with a row of dark brown spots on each side of each line, and a black longitudinal line on each side. 10. D. bimaculella. N. sp. Palpi, head, thorax and forewings shining dark purplish-brown or black. Extreme tip of palpi yellowish-white ; there is a large white spot on the disc just beyond the middle, and a white spot or streak which starts from the beginning of the costal ciliz, but does not attain the dorsal margin. Cilize fuscous. Abdomen pale fuscous, each segment of the venter tipped with white. A/ar ex. 1% inch. Kentucky. Common. Larva unknown. 11. D. cercerisella, NN. sp. “4 Palpi white, except the third joint, which is dark brown from the apex nearly to the base. Face, head, and anterior margin of the thorax, white. - Antenne dark brown, faintly serrated towards the apex. Thorax and anterior wings shining, soft, velvety black, dusted with a few ochreous scales which, in some lights, give it a bronzy hue. Three large snow-white costal spots, the first of which is the largest, extending to the fold ; the second is about the costal middle, and the third at the beginning of the cilie. A white dorsal spot opposite the third costal, and about four small white spots forming a row around the apex; costo-apical ciliz short, dark brown ; dorso-apical ones longer and silvery white ; a dark brown hinder marginal line at the base of the ciliz. Posterior wings scarcely emarginate beneath the tip, pale drab, faintly tinged with pink. Alar ex. ¥% to % inch. The larva is very pretty. When young, it is snowy white; when old, the basal half of each segment, above, is pearly white, and the posterior — half shining black, with a shining black band across the head in front of the eyes, interrupted in the middle, and a transverse bow-shaped shining black streak on the vertex. The true feet are shining black. This is one of the few instances among the Zmeina where the colours of the imago are indicated by those of the larva. It feeds upon the leaves of the Red Bud (Cercis Canadensis), which it either folds or sews together. It is exceedingly abundant in the larval state, but is much infested by an ichneumonide parasite, so that I have been able to rear but a single specimen, and have captured another. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 109 LIST OF THE WRITINGS OF THE LATE COLEMAN TOWNSEND ROBINSON. BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS, ALA. I give here a list of those of the Entomological writings of my late esteemed friend, Mr. Coleman T. Robinson, that have been published under his sole signature. These recommend themselves to the attention of the student by their . conscientious statement and adequate illustration of the different species they discuss. They were all written subsequent to Mr. Robinson’s return in 1868, from a journey to England and Continental Europe, during the prosecution of which a representative collection of European Lepidoptera was acquired, and especial attention was paid to the smaller moths. Mr. Robinson saw and talked with Zeller, whose researches and studies on the Micro-Lepidoptera have furnished the basis on which our best authors have founded their classifications. He could not fail to be benefitted by such contact, and I know he carried with him to his early grave a sweet recollection of the old Professor who had honored him with his good fatherly counsel and even affectionate consideration. Five papers, under the common title of Descriptions of North American Lepidoptera, and illustrated by 86 figures, have been already published under the joint authorship of Mr. Robinson and myself in the Transactions of the American Entomological Society. The sixth and last paper, bringing, according to our original agreement, the number of illustrations to one hundred, and with a revisionary supplement, is in great part completed. The collection on which these and all our other joint entomological writings were based, is now in the possession of the American Entomo- logical Society. Sometime I hope to be able to publish this Sixth Paper, and bring to a conclusion our joint plan and labors. How deeply do I feel the loss of my clear-headed, talented friend and coadjutor : I.—LEPIDOPTEROLOGICAL MISCELLANIES. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History, February 1st, 1869, pp. 152 to 158, Vol. IX., and Reprint, with one coloured plate. In this Paper the following species are described and illustrated :— Luphanessa mendica, Packard, p. 152, plate 1, fig. 1. Luphanessa unicolor, Robinson, p. 153, plate I, fig. 2. 110 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. * I am inclined to refer this Texan species to Walker's genus Ameria ; to which also Crocota cupraria, Walk., belongs. Oligostigna albalis, Robinson, p. 153, plate 1, fig. 3. Catadysta bifascialis, Robinson, p. 154, plate 1, fig. 4. A Texan species allied to C. ofulentalis, Lederer. Lromene texana, Robinson, p. 155, plate 1, fig. 5. Our only described North American species, and allied to Zeller’s £. ramburiella. ; Depressarvia cinereocostella, Clemens, p. 155, plate 1, fig. 6. . Depressaria atrodorsela, Clemens, p. 156, plate 1, fig. 7. Depressaria pulvipennella, Clemens, p. 157, plate 1, fig. 8. Depressaria lecontella, Clemens, p. 157, plate 1, fig. 9. Depressaria grotella, Robinson, p. 157, plate 1, fig. ro. In thus illustrating the closely allied species of this Tineid genius, Mr. Robinson has performed a. very useful task. : II.—NoTeEs oN AMERICAN ToRTRICID&. Transactions of the Ameri- can Entomological Society, Vol. 2, February, 1869, pp. 261—288, with six _ lithographic plates containing eighty-six illustrations. B. The same reprinted; a pamphlet of 27 pages, with the plates coloured. With this article Mr. Robinson commenced his labours on the Tortricidz. Forty-five species of the genus Zortrix are described and figured, twenty-three of which are noticed for the first time, one re-named, and fifteen referred here from the other genera. Fourteen species of the genus Zeras are described and figured, nine for the first time, three referred here from other genera, one European species recognized as occurring in this country. Finally, twelve species of Conchylis are also described and illustrated. Of these, three belonging to that section of the genus which contains the silver-spotted species, are newly described ; of the remainder, seven are first noticed in this paper, and two for the first time referred to this genus. III.—List or NorTH AMERICAN ToRTRICIDS. Part 1. New York Printing Company, October, 18609. IV.—LEPIDOPTEROLOGICAL MISCELLANIES, No. 2. Annals of the New York Lyceum of Natural History, Vol. IX., December, 1869, pp. 310 to 316, and Reprint. In this paper are described the following species :— Hypena internalis, Robinson, p. 311. This species is now known as Lypena torenta, Grote ; thé name used by Mr. Robinson is preoccupied. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ttt Hypena evanidalis, Robinson, p. 311. This species is allied to 7%. humuli, Harris, and has probably been confounded with it. In a paper on the North American species of the genus in MSS., the differences are pointed out. Schoenobius sordidellus, Zeller, p. 31. Schoenobius longirostrellus, Zeller, p. 312. Schoenobius melinellus, Robinson, p. 313- Schoenobius clemensellus, Robinson, p. 313. This is Chilo aquilellus, Clemens, but the name had been previously used. Schoenobius dispersellus, Robinson, p. 313- Schoenobius unipunctellus, Robinson, p. 314. Schoenobius tripunctellus, Robinson, p. 314. Crambus minimellus, Robinson, p. 315. Crambus ‘satrapellus, Zeller, p. 315. Crambus bipunctellus, Zeller, p. 316. So far as known to me, the above list contains mention of all the writings for which the late President of the American Entomological Society was alone responsible. INSECTS OF THE NORTHERN PARTS OF BRITISH AMERICA. COMPILED BY THE EDITOR. From Kirby's Fauna Boreali-Americana: Insecta. (Continued from Page 98.) 238. Pacuyra tirurara Airby.—Length of body 7-9 lines. Several specimens taken in Lat. 54° and 65°. , [179.] This is the American representative of P. guadrimaculaia, trom which it differs principally in being not so hairy, with hoary instead of yellow-tinted hairs: the punctures of the prothorax and elytra are more minute; the antennae are rather shorter, and the elytra, instead of two subquadrangular black spots, have three less black linear ones, the two anterior ones being partly parallel, and in some specimens confluent. GENUS LEPTURA, Linn. This genus may be thus subdivided with respect to the species about to be described. 112 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. * Eyes emarginate, or kidney-shaped. t+ Elytra triangular. a EEMITIGALCO yi S22 eek se ee cee | : b premorse, or with a sinus taken out f a. I prothorax anteriorly constricted without posterior angles. 20 —___________————_ not constricted, posterior angles acute. c POUNCE |e. LO ale sR ae oe, ae ee eee t+ Elytra linear. a runca b oe j at Eee ** Eyes entire. * + a 239. LepTURA CHRYSocOMA A7rby.—Plate v., fig. 1. Length of body 514—6¥ lines. Several specimens taken ; the largest, in the journey from New York; the smaller, near Cumberland-house.. Taken likewise by Dr. MacCulloch and Capt. Hall, in Nova Scotia. [180.] This beautiful insect is related to Z. virens, but perfectly distinet. The body appears to be black, but that colour is, in most parts, nearly concealed by a thick and mostly long coat of brilliant golden hairs with a very slight tint of green, where the coat is thin the body appears minutely punctured. Head subelongated, the neck exserted, subtri- angular ; nose with only a few scattered whitish hairs; antennz black, third, fourth, and fifth joints rather slenderer and longer than the succeed- ing ones: prothorax between globose and bell-shaped, constricted anter- iorly, channelled, grossly punctured: substance of the elytra pale testa- ceous, towards the apex externally they are dusky ; the golden down on them is shorter and decumbent ; apex diverging and obliquely truncatéd : underside of the abdomen particularly brilliant from decumbent hairs : legs less hairy than the rest of the body. [Taken from New York to Lake Superior, but not common. More frequently taken in the neighbourhood of Quebec. | 240. LEPTURA SUBPUBESCENS Xiréy.—Length of body not noticed. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. Body black, thinly coated with yellow hairs. Head and neck grossly punctured ; antennze longer than the prothorax, black, downy, intermediate joints rather slenderer than the others, fourth shorter than the fifth : prothorax shaped as in C. chrysocoma, widely but obsoletely chan- . THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Tea nelled ; rough and reticulated, as it were, with numerous confluent punc- tures, sides more hairy than the disk: elytra thickly punctured, pale testaceous, black at the apex, where the suture curves outwards so that they diverge from each other, extremity nearly transversely truncated : abdomen underneath minutely, breast rather grossly, punctured: podex subemarginate. Pte 241. LEPrURA ERYTHROPTERA Azrdy.—- Length of body 8 lines. Taken in Nova Scotia by Capt. Hall. [181.] Body very black, slightly downy, underneath minutely punc- tured. Head shorter than in the last section, as well as the neck obsoletely channelled; thickly but not minutely punctured ; antennz rather longer than the prothorax ; third and fourth joints a little slenderer than the others, and pale red at the base; the sixth is pale with a black spot on each side at the apex ; and the whole of the eighth is of the same colour; the last joint is acuminated ; the prothorax is constricted anter- iorly, and the constricted part is perfectly smooth, the rest is thickly and -confluently punctured and wrinkled; at the base the prothorax is depressed and obsoletely trilobed: scutellum black, representing an isosceles triangle: elytra of a dull red, grossly and deeply punctured ; extremity scooped out with the external angle longer than the internal and acuminate : mesosternum emarginate posteriorly. [Taken in Canada on flowers in July ; not common. ] 242. LEPTURA CANADENSIS O/ivier.—Length of body 634 to 8 lines. Taken in Nova Scotia by Dr. MacCulloch. Body very black, slightly downy, minutely punctured. Head as in the last species, but the neck is not channelled ; antennz with base of the fifth joint, the whole of the sixth and eighth, except the black apex of the former, pale or pale rufous: prothorax as in 5 ip erythroptera, only deeply and confluently punctured but not wrinkled: elytra black, san- guineous at the base. In other respects this species resembles that insect ; the external angle of the apex of the elytra is however shorter. [Quite common from Georgia to Lake Superior. | ae D2: 243. LEPTURA TENUIOR Airby.—Length of body 534 lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. [182.] Body black, rather slender, slightly punctured, thinly coated with decumbent yellow hairs. Antenne shorter than the body, fifth joint \ Tier < THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. scarcely longer than the fourth: prothorax between bell-shaped and a truncated cone, a little constricted in the middle, fringed with yellow hairs anteriorly and posteriorly : scutellum triangular: elytra testaceous, yellow at the base, and with three yellow bands, the first interrupted ; oblique sinus at the apex not so deep as in the two preceding species: legs testaceous ; abdomen of a deeper colour; and segments scarcely emargi- nate. This species differs in habit from the two preceding ones, it is narrower in proportion, and comes nearer to L. guadrifasciata, but the posterior angles of the prothorax, though acute, are not so prominent ; it belongs however to the same subdivision, with the last mentioned insect. [Considered by Newman to be synonymous with Strangalia fugax.| 225 paves 244. LEPTURA BREVIS Azrby.—Length of body 5 lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. ; Body shorter than usual in proportion to its width ; black, underneath minutely punctured and thinly covered with rather silvery decumbent hairs. Head thickly and confluently punctured, rather downy with erect hoary hairs ; antennze shorter than the body ; fourth, fifth, and sixth joints long and slenderer than the rest; six last short and pale at the base: prothorax between bell-shaped and globose, deeply and confluently punc- tured ; downy with some erect hoary hairs ; anteriorly constricted, poster- iorly depressed: scutellum linear covered with pale decumbent hairs: elytra very grossly and deeply punctured, shorter than the abdomen and rounded at the apex, with a lateral band bent a little inwards towards the base, which it does not reach, of the colour of the yolk of an egg; anus entire: down on the legs yellow. |A variety of Z. vagans Oliv. Taken in Canada, also in N. Y. and Penn. | 245. LEPTURA SEXMACULATA Zinn.—-Length of body 5% lines. Two specimens taken in Lat. 65°. [183.] Body rather short, black, downy, minutely punctured. Head very thickly and minutely punctured, obsoletely channelled ; antenne slender, shorter than the body, fifth joint considerably longer than the fourth : prothorax shaped as in the preceding species but less depressed posteriorly ; very thickly as well as minutely punctured: scutellum tri- angular: elytra pale-yellow, with an arched black spot at the base, then follows an interrupted band consisting of three acute black spots placed in a triangle, beyond the middle is a dentated black band which reaches “THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 115 i neither the suture nor the lateral margin; the apex also, the suture, and the lateral margin towards the apex, are all black. Variety B. Head not channelled: spot at the base of the elytra coalescing with the intermediate and lateral ones of the anterior band, and reaching the lateral margin; interior spot reaching the suture so as to form the half of a spot common to both elytra ; the intermediate band is broader and reaches both the suture and lateral margin. [Belongs to Strangalia (Pachyta). Taken at Quebec by Mr. Couper; Lake Superior by Agassiz’s Expedition. | ONT. Sa 246. Leprura semivirrata A7zrby.—Length of body 6 lines. ‘Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. Body long and narrow, black, underneath slightly and minutely punc- tured, with the sides of the breast and abdomen brilliant with a silvery lustre from decumbent silky hairs, above glossy and almost naked. Head thickly punctured, but behind each eye there is a levigated space; antenne longer than the prothorax, intermediate joints not slenderer -than the others, the fourth as long as the fifth ; neck short and levigated: prothorax bell-shaped, not constricted anteriorly, depressed posteriorly ; thinly punctured, especially in the disk: scutellum triangular: elytra punctured but not thickly, punctures almost arranged in rows, towards the apex they are very slight ; a reddish-yellow subflexuose stripe runs from the middle of the base of the elytra a little more than half way towards the apex, which is diverging and truncated: the ventral segments of the abdomen terminate in a reddish membrane. [Synonymous with L. vittata Oliv.; common in Canada on flowers during June and July; taken from Alabama northwards. | [184.] 247. Leprura GULOSA Kirby.—Length of the body 5 lines. Taken in Nova Scotia by Dr. MacCulloch. Very nearly related to the preceding species, from which it differs chiefly in being much smaller, in having the underside of the body more thickly covered with hairs glittering like silver ; in having the throat pale- red ; the fifth joint of the antennz longer than the fourth ; the punctures of the elytra more numerous and scattered ; the yellow stripe running nearer to the apex of the elytra, dilated at the base and not flexuose: the fore-breast also in the disk, the after-breast on each side, and the base of the thighs are obscurely red : the tibize are piceous. 116 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. * + b. 248. LEPTURA SUBARGENTATA A7zrby.—Length of the body 4 lines. - Taken in Lat. 65°. Body narrow, entirely black, very minutely and thickly punctured, underneath glittering, but less conspicuously with silver pile; antennz shorter than the body, nearly filiform, fourth and fifth joints of equal length ; protnorax perfectly bell-shaped, anteriorly not constricted, posterior angles acute, diverging and covered with silver pile: elytra rounded at the apex. [Taken in Canada and Lake Superior. | [185.] 249. Leprura simitis Kirby.—Length of body 3% lines. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. This may possibly be the other sex of the preceding species which it resembles in every respect, except that the antenne are rather longer, the scape or first joint, all but the base on the upper side, is rufous, as are likewise the thighs and four anterior tibize; the posterior thighs are however black at the apex. 250. LEPTURA LONGICORNIS Azréy.—Length of body 5 lines. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. At first sight this species a good deal resembles LZ. semivittata and gulosa of the former section, but its eyes are entire, and its antennz much slenderer and of a different type, more nearly resembling those of L. argentata and similis. Body black, minutely punctured, downy, especially underneath, with silvery hairs. Head minutely, thickly, and confluently punctured ; labrum and base of the mandibles rufous ; last joint of the palpi securiform; antennae very Slender nearly as long as the body ; scape incrassated, rutous, black at the base: prothorax a little constricted anteriorly, very thickly punctured with a longitudinal dorsal impunctured line or channel : scutellum longitudinally concave, rounded at the apex; elytra nearly linear, grossly punctured, glossy, nearly black, with a pale stripe extending from the middle of the base to near the apex, and gradually approaching the suture ; apex subtruncated: legs rufous at the base. [Belongs to the genus Acmaofs Lec.] [186.] 251. Leprura Proteus Azréy.-—Length of body 34%—-5%4 lines. Taken abundantly in Lat. 54° and 65°. Body narrow, black, punctured, somewhat glossy, rather hairy, especi- ally underneath, with decumbent hairs, those on the elytra have somewhat a. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 117 of a golden lustre, the rest are silvery. Nose more grossly punctured than the rest of the head; vertex convex; eyes subovate, pale with a slight golden lustre; antennae filiform, longer than the prothorax, obscurely rufous, with the four first joints black, fifth joint longer than the fourth : prothorax campanulate, anteriorly constricted, posterior angles a little diverging, thinly punctured; channelled, the channel running between two dorsal gibbosities: scutellum triangular: elytra rather widest at the base, and punctured there more grossly next the suture ; diverging and truncated at the apex: tibiae piceous or rufo-piceous ; four posterior thighs rufous at the base. Variety B. In this variety only the base of the six last joints of the antennae is rufous, all the thighs are rufous at the base, and the tibiae of a clearer red, but they are dusky at the apex; tarsi rufous at the base. Length of the body 334 lines. C. Elytra with a stripe at the base, tips and lateral margin rufous : antennae entirely black: legs as in variety B. Length of the body 434 lines. D. Elytra with a longitudinal rufous stripe dilated at the base and apex ; bead of the lateral margin also rufous; antennae and legs nearly as in B, but the whole of the tarsi is obscurely rufous. Length of the body 3—4 lines. EK. Elytra rufous with the suture and a -stripe near the margin abbreviated at both ends, dusky : antennae as in A; legs asin B. Length of the body 4—5 lines. F. Elytra rufous, with a dusky suture ; antennae as in A; legs as in D. G. Like F, but elytra luteous ; antennae all black. Length of the body 4 lines. H. Like F and G, but legs and antennae black. Length of the body 334 lines. LZ. Proteus seems to vary ad infinitum in the colour of the elytra, antennae, and legs, but as all the varieties agree in every respect except colour and size, and the elytra, advance so gradually from pale rufous to black, or vice versa, there can be little doubt of the identity of the different varieties. [This very variable species is common throughout Canada. It belongs to the genus Acmaops Lec. | 118 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. |187.] 252. Leprura Lonciceps A7réy.—Length of body 4 lines. Several specimens taken in Lat. 54° and 65°. Like the preceding species but shorter in proportion with a longer head. Body black, punctured, hoary with rather silvery down: head as long or longer than the prothorax; eyes pale, subtriangular ; antennae with the second, third and fourth joints slenderer than the rest : prothorax shaped as in Z. Proteus, constricted before, depressed behind, but without ~ diverging angles, channelled but with no gibbosity on each side the channel : ‘elytra nearly linear, very thickly punctured, dirty-yellow, with a dusky lateral blotch extending from the base beyond the middle of the elytrum, suture and subtruncated apex black ; down yellowish. [Belongs to Acmaops Lec. | END OF CERAMBYCID&. nT OBITUARY. We grieve to have to record the death of another devoted Entomologist, Mr. Coteman T. Ropinson, of New York, who expired, after a very brief illness, on the 1st of May last. Mr. Robinson was born in Putnam County, N. Y., in 1838, and had but recently completed the 35th year of his age. When quite a young man, he made a prolonged tour through Europe, Egypt and the Holy Land, and spent some time at the University of Berlin. On his return to New York, in 1861, he engaged in business as a stock broker in Wall Street, and soon became the head of a very successful and enterprising firm, Messrs. Robinson, Cox & Co. So shrewd and successful were his speculations that ina few years he amassed a large fortune, and on his retirement from business a couple of years ago, he was reputed to be worth about a million and a half of dollars. Latterly he resided near Brewster's Station, on the New York and Haarlem Railway, where he had purchased a handsome country seat. Notwithstanding his devotion to business of so engrossing and exciting a character,he yet found time to indulge in his favorite study of Entomology, and in connection with his friend, Mr. Grote, described a Jarge number of new species of North American Lepidoptera, chiefly belonging to the families of Sphingide, Bombycide, Noctuade and Tortricide. A list of his published papers, prepared by his coadjutor, Mr. Grote, is given on another page. We are glad to learn that amongst his other bequests, Mr. Robinson left the handsome sum of $10,000 to the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, with which he was connected for several years. a EE I EE ES 2 EE - } ; a —' ee a ree t) S q THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. LL9 MISCELLANEOUS NOTES. A New DepartTuRe.—We invite especial attention to the card of that talented and well known Entomologist, Mr. FRANCIS GREGORY SANBORN. We heartily congratulate our esteemed confrere on the stand he has taken on the behalf of Practical Entomologists. Mr. Sanborn is thoroughly qualified, from his scientific attainments and __per- sonal reputation, to take this step, and we sincerely trust a new era may be dawning for Entomological Science, in which the professional skill of competent scientists may receive an equal share of recognition with that of members of the various other learned professions. We feel, however, quite satisfied that while Mr. Sanborn has laid down his terms of consul- tation, he will’always be ready, as heretofore, to afford any information to brother Entomologists, or to students struggling to overcome the diffi- culties of the science.—| Zaitor C. £.] STRANGALIA LUTEICORNIS.—On one of the last days of July, 1871, as I emerged from the woods which cover the eastern end of Bishop’s Island—one of the most romantically situated of the Thousand Isles—I _came upon a sunny glade, and in it stood a flowering shrub, (the name of which I do not know,) in full bloom. ‘The blossoms were thronged. with the insect hosts—well nigh all orders being represented in sufficient variety to stock a fair-sized entomological cabinet. My attention was most attracted to the Coleoptera, from the great numbers of Zyfocerus fugax and some few specimens of Strangalia luteicornis. The latter, from the extreme narrowness of their bodies and elytra, as well as from their markings, were very noticeable ; they were also particularly active, running over the flowers, taking to flight, or dropping down among the leaves in a way that almost defied capture. I, however, succeeded in taking one; and learning from a great authority in such matters,that though well known in Pennslyvania, it has not, as yet, been included among the .natives of this Province, I make this note of the fact of my capture.—R. V. RoGERs, Kingston. NoTes AND QueErRIESs. — Zrichius Bigsbit.—Gunorimus maculosus, Burmeister, Knoch. This insect seems to be very rare in this part of Canada. During nearly thirty years collecting, I have found only one specimen, taken at Drummondville, in the Niagara District. Other collections seem to have been equally unfortunate. Pelidnota punctata.—Common about London and Niagara ; has never to my knowledge, been found near Toronto. ¥ 120 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Desmocerus cyaneus.—About 25 years ago, I took a colony of about 30 specimens off some elder bushes in rear of Trinity College. I have never met with another specimen near Toronto, one I found in fall of 1870 at the Sault St. Marie. ; Calosoma scrutator.—Of this magnificent insect, many dead specimens 3 may be collected on the south shore of our Toronto peninsula after a southerly wind, but I have collected but two hving specimens on this side of the lake. Query.—Is it known that any of the large Carabide are capable of ejecting an acid liquid like the Bombardiers? ‘The following anecdote may prehaps be worth embalming in the CaNapiAN ENTOMOLOGIST -—— In the fall of 1839, 1 was wandering with a friend over the rocks at Thurand, near Dresden, and found a magnificent Carvedus, about an ich long, probably Awratus or Auronitens. Examining it, the beast ex- ploded, and shot me in the eye. The pain was so intense, lasting for full a quarter of an hour, that, notwithstanding my Entomological proclivities, the insect was allowed to escape. QvueERyY.—Can any of your correspondents refer me to a paper on the sugar from the ‘** Mexican Honey Ant?” I have seen it, but cannot recall where. On mentioning this to my late lamented friend, Mr. Williamson, who was for years engaged on railway construction in Mexico, he informed me that the Indians were often in the habit of knocking down ants’ nests from the boughs of trees,and extracting honey from the interior ; this honey having been formed, not by the ants, who build the suspended nests, but by a species of bee (he called them Sweat Bees), which constructed their comb in the centre of the ants’ nest. I should be glad to obtain any information of my late friends statement.—H. H. Crorr, Toronto, : ADVERTISEMENTS. Exoric LEPIDOPTERA AND COLEOPTERA.—I have a large collection of specimens of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera from Australia, Manilla, Mexico, and Central America, which I am now arranging for the purpose of sale, as I intend confining myself to Californian insects for the future. I will not exclude from the offered sale my numerous Californian specimens. I will continue to collect in all branches of the Californian entomological fauna, and I invite exchange. I have also a complete set of the Pacific Railroad Survey Reports (13 volumes), in excellent condition, which I shall be glad to dispose of. Apply to JAMes BEHRENS, San Francisco California. Che Canadian Entomologist. VOL. IV. LONDON, ONT., JULY, 1872. No. 7 NOTES ON ARGYNNIS' CYBELE. BY W. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONT. On the 7th of June, while turning over some loose rails lying on a moist piece of ground, near the edge of a wood, I found attached to the underside of one of the rails, lying high and dry, two spinous larvae, which, from their appearance and location, I at once suspected to be the larvae of some species of Argynnis. The Wild Violet also, the food plant of at least several’ of this family, growing in abundance here, helped to confirm my suppositions. ‘These afterwards proved to be the larvae of Argynnis cybele. Both larvae were in the act of spinning a small web of silk, to which their terminal prolegs were attached, indi- cating that the change to the chrysalis state would soon take place. The following description was at once taken :— Length 1.70 inches. Body thickest along the middle segments, tapering a little at each end, coils itself up when disturbed. Head medium sized, flat in front, slightly bilobed, each lobe tipped above with a short tubercle, from which arises a moderately long black hair ; colour black in front, edged posteriorly above, and half way down the sides with dull brownish-yellow. On the front there are many fine black hairs of varying lengths. Body above black, with a faint tinge of reddish brown, armed with a transverse row of branching spines on each segment. On the second segment there is a branching spine on each side the dorsal line all black, and another pair on sides between the second and third segments, black above, brownish-yellow at base. On the third segment there are four spines similarly situated, that is, one sub-dorsal pair, and another pair lower down, and placed between the third and fourth segments, all black above, brownish-yellow at base. On the fourth segment there is one pair of spines only, the sub-dorsal. From the fifth to the twelfth ‘segments inclusive, each is alike ornamented with a transverse row of six branching spines, those on each side the dorsal line entirely black, or 199, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. with but a slightly paler shade at base ; the next row lower down black above, with a small portion of their base brownish-yellow, excepting on the twelfth segment, where they are all black; but in the next row below, —_ ihe spines have a larger portion of their base brownish-yellow, with a small space around the base of each where the same colour preyails. Terminal segment with two pairs of black branching spines,. one pair placed behind the other, the hindermost being a little the shortest. On the sides of each of the anterior segments, below the spines, there are several shining black tubercles, each emitting a small cluster of short black hairs. Spiracles oval, black, edged with a paler shade. Under surface dull dark reddish-brown. The fifth, sixth, eleventh ~ and twelfth segments each have a transv erse row of shining tubercles, emitting tufts of short black hairs ; feet black, prolegs have a patch of black on the outside at their base, reddish-brown above, and within. Before turning to chrysalis, the-colour at the base of the spines changed from brownish-yellow to a semi-transparent greenish hue. One specimen hung itself up June 9, and became a chrysalis June 10. From the first, the chrysalis is very dark coloured. ‘The following description was taken a few days after the change was effected :— Chrysalis.—Length 1.30 inches. Colour brown, spotted and streaked with black, the whole surface having a polished appearance as if it had been varnished. Head case square above, the flat portion terminating on each side in a slightly raised blackish tubercle: a dark line extends across from one tubercle to the other, bordered in front and behind with yellowish brown. A double ventral row of dark brown or blackish tubercles, one pair on each segment ; below these there is a second row of smaller tubercles of a paler colour along the middle segments, just above the spiracles. At the base of the wing cases is a pointed projec- tion. Anterior segments raised to a sharp ridge, and the ventral edge of the wing cases have a similar ridge along the basal portion. Antennae cases dark brown: spiracles oval black. Dorsal region of posterior segments dark brown, nearly black. On visiting the same. locality on the 9th of June, three chrysalides were found on the under side of pieces of bark which had been peeled off a dead tree, and were lying scattered about. The pupae were found 3 attached to those pieces which were lying with their convex side up- ; wards, thus affording a dry and sheltered spot under for the larvae to attach themselves to. I then collected a number of such pieces of bark, ee ‘ ry — bo oo THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. and laid them about in this manner in spots where the Wild Violets grew thickest, and on my return two or three days after, found six more chrysalides, and another larva just about to change. I feel assured that with such traps as these laid about in places where they are feeding, any one may secure specimens of these larva without trouble during the first ~ week or ten days in June. I have never succeeded in finding them other- _ wise, although I have searched long and often. One of the chrysalides pro- duced the imago on the 26th, another on the 27th of June, and others at intervals between the 27th of June, and the 4th of July. The speci- men which changed to a chrysalid on the roth of June produced the imago on the 29th, but this was kept in a cool room all the time, and was hence probably longer in perfecting than it would have been if _ exposed to the warming influence of the summer's sun. I should judge the ordinary duration of the chrysalis state, when left in their native haunts, to be from fourteen to sixteen days. All the specimens bred proved to be Argynuis cvbele. LEAF-MINING COLEOPTERA. BY V. I. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. It is necessary for me to correct a serious error into which I have fallen. At page 165, v. 3, I have described a larva mining the upper surface of leaves of the White Oak (Quercus alba), which seemed to me to answer the requirements of Dr. Clemens’ Zithocolletis tubiferella, which also mines the leaves of Quercus alba. ‘The larva was not removed from the mine, but viewed through the integument. It seemed to me to resemble greatly, if it was not identical with, Dr. Clemens’ species. The mine answered, in every respect, to that described by Dr. Clemens. At the same time I remarked the peculiar appearance of the larva, which “differs from the ordinary flat Zzthocolletis larva as much as that does _ from the larva of the first or cylindrical group.” In fact I should never have suspected it to be a Lithocolletis larva but for the resemblance, both _ of the mine and larva, to that of Z. ‘udiferella, as described by Dr. Clemens. I did not succeed in rearing the imago, and do not know 124 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. what it would have produced. On the next page (166, v. 3), I mentioned a larva precisely like it, but in a different blotch mine, inhabiting the leaves of Willow Oaks, and another in leaves of the Black Oak, still another in the leaves of the Beech, another in the Sugar Maple, and yet another in the leaves of a species of Desmodium. Viewed through the integument, all of these larva, except the Desmodium miner, resembled the supposed larva of Z. tubiferella. The miners of the Beech and Sugar Maple leaves appeared to be identical with each other and with the supposed ZL. ¢ubiferelia, but their mines differed from it, and resembled those in the leaves of the Black and Willow Oak in being more irregular blotches. The miners of the Black and Willow Oaks differed from the others by being of a bluish or smoky colour instead of yellowish-white. The miner of the Desmodium differed from the others in shape resembling the larva of Leucanthiza,as described by Dr. Clemens. But the mine and cocoon (or rather mzdws), are indistinguishable from those of Litho- colletis guttifinitella Clem. and allied species of Lithocolletis. These larva are all Coleopterous / They remained in the mines without food from September to the latter part of April. All died except the miners of the Beech (Fagus ferruginea) and of the Desmodium. In the latter part of April these became pup, remaining in that condition for ten days, when the imagines emerged. The miner of the Beech proved to be Brachys aeruginosa, Say, as identified by Dr. Horn, as | am informed by Mr. Wm. Saunders. . The miner of the Desmodium proved to be Aetonius laevigatus, Say, as identified by Mr. Johnson Pettit, of Grimsby, Ont. The larva of the Brachys resembles that of Chrysobothris femorata, as figured in Packard's Guide, p. 457, more nearly than that of Zrachys pygmea, figured on p. 458. The head is rounded in front ; the first segment is much the largest, and the larva tapers rapidly thence to the fourth segment, and thence more gradually to the apex. The larva of AZetontus daevigatus is flat- tened, and is rather widest about the middle, tapering, however, more rapidly to the tail than towards the head; the first segment is largest, and the head rounded in front. It resembles the larva of Zrachys in outline more than that of Chrysobothris. In examining dead speci- mens of all these larve removed from the mines this spring, I was not able to detect any trace of feet. I have no excuse to plead for this error other than the facts above stated, and ignorance of Coleopterous larve. \ ie THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 125 ee LS Sa Hlispa quadrata, Fabr, mines the leaves of the Linden ( 7i/1a Ameri- cana ). fispa inacgualis, Weber, mines the leaves of Zupatorium ageratotdes. Both species pupate in the mine. Both identified by Dr. Horn. DESCRIPTIONS OF - GELECHIA ADUNCELLA anp GELECHIA LABRADORICA. ! BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS, ALA. In a very interesting paper published by Professor Zeller in the Transactions of the Royal Imperial Zoological Botanical Society of Vienna, under the date of July, 1868, I find the description of a North American Gelechia. ‘The specimens were communicated to Prof. Zeller by Baron V. Osten-Sacken. I give here a free translation of Professor Zeller’s comparative description :— Gelechia aderucella, Zeller.—Allied to G. “igulella. ‘Vhe yellowish- white transverse line of the primaries, which becomes pure white on the costal edge, is removed farther towards the hind margin of the wing. It is strongly bent below costa towards the apices, and a little widened, is continued on the costal edge outwardly. The ground colour of the base is greyish-brown, so pale in hue as to allow the three black dots {two on the fold, one obliquely over the last of these outwardly at the middle of the wing), to be more or less distinctly perceivable, whereas in G. figuiella and vorticella no dots are visible on the black ground colour of the wing. This greyish-brown tint deepens, beyond the outer two _ dots, gradually into the broad black shade which margins the transverse line. The fringes of the secondaries are pale grey, becoming paler outwardly, and’are even at base paler than the external portion of the wing itself. Beneath, the forewings exhibit beyond. the middle, and in a corresponding position with the superior end of the transverse line of the upper surface, a rather distinct white spot. In size this species agrees with an average specimen of G. Zigu/e//a. In the IViencr Entomologisché Monatschrift for June, 1864, p. 200, | find a description, of which I give here a translation, of a species of Gelechia from Labrador, by Mr. H. B. Moeschler :— Gelechia labradorica, Moeschler.— 7—Antennz greyish-yellow with - 126 - THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. aan whitish-yellow annuli, palpi greyish-yellow, terminal joint pale yellowish, — feet, head, thorax and abdomen greyish-yellow. Forewings of a darker a greyish-yellow, subcostal nervules darker, brownish. Hindwings whitish- _ grey, a narrow dark marginal line. Beneath, the forewings are brownish- — grey, with a narrow yellow marginal line. ; aia Lxpanse 22 mil. This inconspicuous species is illustrated on plate 5, at figure 17. : On the same page is recorded the occurrence of Gelechia comtinuella in Labrador. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. ‘ BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 108. DEPRESSARIA, D, pallidochrella, N. sp. Head and palpi very pale ochreous, almost white, a little darker on top, a dark brown spot extends almost entirely around the base of the third joint of the palpi, and another entirely around it before the apex. Antennae brownish, with about six white annulations in the apical part. ‘Thorax and base of the wings pale ochreous, sparsely dusted with fuscous, with a fuscous line across the wing close to the base. About the basal one-fourth of the wing a fuscous streak passes obliquely backwards as far as the fold, and from thence to the apex the wing is pale ochreous, rather thickly dusted with fuscous and dark ochreous, with the extreme apex fuscous. Posterior wings pale fuscous; ciliae of all the wings grayish- ochreous ; abdomen dark ochreous, each segment above tipped with very pale or whitish ochreous. Under surface very pale ochreous, with fuscous patches on the anterior surfaces of the meso and meto-thoracic legs. - Anterior legs dark brown on their anterior surfaces. A/ar ex. less than ‘¢ Of an inch. Captured in May in Kentucky. The posterior wings in this species are deeply emarginate beneath the ~ apex ; this and the succeeding species which resemble each other being the only two described American species which display this character. This species may be distinguished from the next by its smaller size, paler color, and the brown tip of the forewings. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. NV. sp. ine Head and palpi ochreous, thickly dusted with brown; a brown 18 annulus around the base of the third joint of the palpi, and another before i ‘the apex. Antennae dark brown, faintly annulate with ochreous, and 2 with five or six white annulations in the apical portion. Thorax and anterior wings ochreous, thickly dusted with dark brown; a little less ; D. versicolorella. thickly in’ the basal fourth of the wing, with a brown, streak across the base of the wing, and a brown streak extending obliquely from the costa . a about the basal fourth, to the fold, which, however, is scarcely distin- - guishable from the thickly dusted portion of the wing behind it; no : brown spot at the apex. Posterior wings pale fuscous : abdomen ochreous, _ the segments not margined with whitish, as in the preceding species. | Afar ex. #s of an inch. Captured in Kentucky in May. ; D. bicosto-maculella. N. sp. Head pale yellowish, the vertex dusted with fuscous ; antennae dark brown; second joint of the palpi pale yellowish, tipped with brown _ beneath: third joint brown, sprinkled above with pale yellowish : thorax and anterior wings blackish, or very dark brown, with ochreous and gray intermixed, with a small and indistinct ochreous spot on the costa, near tht base, and another distinct costalous at the beginning of the ciliae, and an opposite dorsal one ; ciliae yellowish-ochreous. There are several ‘rather undefined irregular blackish spots or patches on the wings, which, to the naked eye, appear to form three irregular transverse bands, not very definite in outline, one of which adjoins each of the costal ochreous spots, whilst the other is between them. A/ar cx. * inch. Kentucky. D. querciella. N. sp. This species is a Depressaria in every respect except that there is a small but very distinct tuft of erect scales at the apex of the thorax. J have but a single specimen, which, however, is in perfect condition, and shows no sign of any injury, so that I cannot doubt that the tuft is a normal y structure. | Antennae dark brown or rather blackish, annulate with white ; palpi iron gray; head silvery, flecked with dark brown or blackish scales ; _ thorax iron gray, the tuft being ochreous ; anterior wings dark iron gray, with a distinct small blackish spot on the costa at about the basal fourth, . and two other smaller ones on the costa, one about the middle, and the _ other at the beginning of the apical ciliae; there are three or four _ similar small ones on the disc; ciliae ochreous ; posterior wings pale s 128 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. slate colour, and the abdomen is yet paler. The entire insect, in some, lights, ‘shows purplish reflections. Under the lens, the iron gray colour is resolved into blackish or dark brown, mixed with ochreous and whitish scales. Alar ex. 1% inch. The larva has the head and first segment dark purplish-brown, except the anterior margin of -the first segment, which is whitish. Remaining segments whitish, with two longitudinal narrow pale purplish lines on top, © outside of which, on each side, isa wider deep purple one; there is also a multitude of small purple spots, from each of which proceeds a hair. — It sews together leaves of the Oak (Quercus obtusiloba) in May, and remains in the pupa state about ten days, the imago appearing early in June. The two preceding species and J. obscurusella, ante, ~. 106, and D. bistrigella, ante, p. 92, reserable each other very closely. JD. obscurusella is more ochreous than the others, and the markings assume the form rather of narrow irregular and zig-zag lines, although, on close inspection, three dark costal spots may be discovered as in gwerciella, but less dis- tinct. D. dbicostomaculella is smaller than the others, and the three costal blackish spots have, in it, become to the naked eye three irregular bands, narrowing towards the dorsal margin. 1 have no specimen of D. dzstri- géla now before me, but I think it can be distinguished by the more linear shape of the ochreous streaks before the ciliae, and by the two small ochreous patches about the middle of the wing. JD. guercie//la may, however, be more readily distinguished by the thoracic tuft. As the species of Depressaria described in this and the preceding No. differ somewhat, structurally, it is possible that some of them ought not, in strictness, to be placed in this genus. Yet they approach it more nearly than any other. The following notes will explain their similitudes and differences :— D. dubitella has the second joint of the palpi much thickened, form- ing a small undivided brush ; the superior portion of the discal vein is very oblique, and the superior branch is united to the subcostal at the end of the cell. The abdomen in my single specimen is broken off. It does not belong strictly in Depressaria. D. albisparsella has the palpi of Defressaria, but the brush is very large ; the wings in my single specimen are closed so that I cannot observe the neuration. ‘The antennae are minutely but distinetly pectin- ated, more so than in the true Depressaria. int” Oe a ee THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 129 : Dz cercerisella and D. bimaculela resemble each other in the ornamen- tation as well as structure. ‘The abdomen is. subdepressed, the palpal oi brush is small and undivided, except at the apex. The neuration is that _ of Depressaria proper, though the superior and inferior branches of the _ discal _nervure respectively, originate a little nearer to the subcostal and ~ median than is usual in true Depressaria. tl D. pseudacaciella has the abdomen subdepressed, scarcely tufted, and the superior branch of the discal vein arises very near to the subcostal; ; otherwise, it is a true Depressaria. * é Dz fusco-ochrella has the abdomen and palpi of Depfressaria, but the neuration of the hind wings is like that of some species of Gedechia ; that is, the superior branch of the discal vein is absent, and the subcostal is furcate behind the cell. D. dicostomaculella, D. Rileyella, D. obscurusella, D. Versicolorella, and D. pallidochrella, are true Depressariz, 1 believe, though the abdomen in my single specimen of D. obscurusel/a is missing. D. pallidochrella and D. versicolorella are very deeply emarginate beneath the apex of the hind wings. JD. guercielfa has the small thoracic tuft, but is otherwise a true Depressaria. All of the foregoing species agree in the neuration of the anterior wings, and all have the Defressaria habits of seeking concealment, and of sliding about upon their backs in their efforts to escape. HAGNO, geu. 107. At ante p. gr, I have described a species as Depressaria cryptolechiella, and have there pointed out the differences between it and the true Depressarie. ndeed, it is scarcely more nearly allied to Depressaria than to several other genera; but having then but a single specimen of ' that species, and none of any other species allied to it more closely than the species of Defressaria, 1 preferred to place it provisionally in that genus. Since then, however, I have bred the species mentioned below, and not wishing to encumber that genus (already large) with any thing which does not rightly belong there, and, not knowing what else to do with these species, I have concluded to erect for them this new genus. Head and face slightly roughened. Antennz more than half as long _ as the wings ; face rather narrow; eyes large, globose; tongue scaled, - longer than the anterior coxa; maxillary palpi minute ; labial palpi very long, completely overarching the vertex, second joint without a brush, third joint accuminate, about two-thirds as long as the second, ~ 130 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Posterior wing not emarginate beneath the apex, wider than the anterior, the costal margin nearly straight, the dorsal regularly curved. The discal cell is closed: the costal vein attains the margin just before the apex ; the sub-costal at the apex ; the median sends a branch to the. posterior margin betore the discal vein, and becomes furcate at the discal vein, delivering both branches to the posterior margin. ‘The discal vein is slightly oblique, and sends two branches to the dorsal margin ; internal vein, simple. Anterior wings wdest near the apex; costal margin a little convex, dorsal margin nearly straight, apical margin obliquely curved, and apex obtusely rounded. Discal cell closed; costal vein attains the margin about the middle, and the sub-costal attains it before the apex, giving off one branch before the discal vein ; the median rounds gradually into the discal, sending, near the discal, tvo long curved branches to the dorso- apical margin ; and the discal sends off four-veins, the superior of which is furcate, delivering one of its branches to the apex, and the other to the costal margin before the apex ; the three other branches of-the discal are delivered to the apical margin behind the apex ; the sub-median is furcate at the base ; the internal is wanting, and the fold is very distinct. The neuration is, therefore, that of Depressaria. ‘The abdomen is also slightly depressed, though not so much as in Defressaria ; and it seems to differ from that genus only in having the palpi more elongate, and without any brush, and in its wider wings, which are more obtusely rounded at the apex. It is certainly not equivalent to either Zx@retia or Ortholelia, but possibly may be equivalent to Crypfolechia, which, however, has not the depressed abdomen. Can this genus be the equivalent of Pyz/ocorsis, Clem. ? (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 1860, fp. 272). \t meets all the requirements of Dr. Clemens’ diagnosis, except as to the form and neuration of the fore wings. Not only so, but what I have called ¢+e pattern of coloration is the same in my species as in those described by Dr. Clemens, especially as to the peculiar markings of the antennae and palpi; and even the very shades of colour are the same to a great extent. I have not:seen any of Dr. Clemens’ species, and can only compare mine with his written descrip- tions. The striking resemblance between my species of Hagno and those of Psidocorsis,as described by Dy. Clemens, did not attract my attention until after the preceding portion of this paper was in the hands of the printer, for, on comparing the fore wing of 47. faginella with a 1 ; ¢ J of ee ee re THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 131 sketch of that of Psifocorsis,as described by Dr.Clemens, the very decided differences at once satisfied me that the genera were not the same; and the species were accordingly described as belonging to the new genus Hlagno. Subsequently, my attention was attracted to the close resem- blance between the species, and a closer comparison has suggested the probability that Dr. Clemens has misdescribed the forewings of his genus, and that the two genera may be equivalent. ‘lhe differences are con- fined entirely to the fore wings; but then they are decided, and are as follows :— Dr. Clemens says that in Pscéocorsts the hind margin is obliquely pointed. In /Yagno, the costal and dorsal margins are nearly parallel. The wing is widest just before the apex, which is obliquely truncate with the angles rounded. In Psv/ocorsis, there is a secondary cell which I have not been able to detect in Hlagno. In Psilocorsis, the subcostal gives off (besides the long branch from near the middle), four branches from near the end of the cell, and the fourth is furcate. In Hagno, only three are given off (besides the long one from the middle), from wear the end, and the //ird of these is furcate. In Psilocorsis, the median vein gives off four branches from near the end of the cell. In Hagno only three. In ffagno, the discal vein gives off two branches, but Dr. Clemens does not mention any branches from it in Psz/ocorss. These differences are too great to occur in one genus; and as they first caught my attention, they satisfied me that the genera were very distinct. On closer examination, however, I cannot help suspecting that there is some mistake in Dr. Clemens’ diagnosis, and that the genera will prove to be equivalent. 1. S21. cryptolechiella. D. eryptolechiella. Ante p gt. Hf. faginella, LN. sp. : Ochreous yellow, with a silky lustre; anterior wings dusted with brown, and with confused indistinct dark brown blotches, and with a row of dark brown spots around the apex. The antennae are annulate with brown ; the second joint of the labial palpi has a dark brown stripe along its under surface, which is continued along the under surface of the third joint to its apex, and the third joint likewise has a similar stripe along the outer, and one along its inner surface. Anterior surface of _ the two first pair of legs with dark brown patches, and their tarsi annulate with dark brown. Alar ex. 34 inch. Kentucky. to 133 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. The larva sews together the leaves of Beech Trees (/agus ferruginca) feeding between them, and there passing the pupa state, the imago emerging in May. The larva is whitish, with the head ferruginous, the next segment faintly so, and there is a pinkish patch on each side of the anterior margin of the third segment. fT. cryptolechiella also pupates between the leaves of its food plant, and this habit, like the stripes on the palpi, which are common to both ~ species, might almost be considered generic characters. Depressaria cerceriseila, ante p. ro8, seems to connect this genus with that. It has the abdomen but little depressed, the palpi elongate, as in this genus, and the brush is scarcely deserving that name, being very small, and appearing to be divided only near the apex. It agrees also . with this genus in carrying the wings rather more nearly horizontal than Depressaria, and while it has not the dark stripes on the terminal palpal joint, it has that entire joint black. But in Hagvo, the anterior wings are © not pointed, the apical margin being oblique, whilst in D. cercerisel/a, as in all my other species of that genus the anterior wings have the apex pointed or obtusely pointed. It also differs from /7agve, and agrees with Depressaria, in not pupating between the mined leaves. TELPHUSA, geil. Nov. Nearly allied to Depressaria, from which it differs in having the abdomen not depressed, the antennae more setiform ; the palpal brush very small, though there is a trace of a longitudinal division ; and the terminal joint of the palpi longer than the second. ‘The superior branch of the discal vein arises from a common stalk with the apical portion of the subcostal, so that the discal sends off but a single independent branch; but this is likewise the case in some species of Depressaria, as e.g. D. pseudacaciella and some others ; and in all the species of Depres saria, when it is independent, it arises very close to the sub-costal, the difference in this respect being that the letter V, formed where they arise from a common stalk, is split at the apex, when they do not. D. cerceri- sella has the normal neuration of Defressarvia, but has a very small scarcely divided brush. In Hagno, miht, they are more distinctly separated than in any species of Depressaria that I have seen. With these explanations, the account which I have given of the neuration of Hagno will do for this genus and for Depressaria also. In /fagno, the palpi are as in Depressaria, except that there is no brush. ywicostoma, as defined by Clemens, has very nearly the same neuration with Defressaria also, but . THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 133 has the third palpal joint short. In Ze/phusa, the costal margin of the shind wings is a little excised from about the middle to the tip, and the apical part of the subcostal vein is curved. In all these genera, as well as in Callima and Tricotaphe, the neuration of the fore wings is the same. ‘The two latter genera differ somewhat from each other and from the preceding genera, in the neuration of the hind wings. LT. curvistrigella. N. sp. Palpi dark purple, the tip of the second joint and an annulus near the tip of the third, white ; head white ; palpi white, annulate with dark purple above ; thorax and anterior wings rich dark purple; at the base of the costa is a patch of whitish, mixed with purple, and just behind it is a rather wide white streak, which begins on the costa, crosses the wing obliquely to the dorsal margin, and extends along it and into the dorsal ciliae nearly to the apex ; just behind the middle of the wing in the dark purple part of it, is a faint indication of a whitish fascia. A/ar ex. 3% inch. Kentucky. \ HINTS TO FRUIT GROWERS. PAPER NO. 5. BY W. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONT. THE PEACH BORER. The wasp-like moth of the peach borer, Ageria exitiosa, will be busy during the present month, depositing her eggs on the bark of the trunks of the Peach trees ; then as soon as the eggs hatch, the young grubs will begin to eat their way to the inner bark, where it is difficult to reach them. Much good may yet be done, either in preventing the moths from laying their eggs, or, if laid, in destroying the young larve, by brushing the trunks and main branches of the trees with soft soap, reduced with lye to about the consistence of paint. Fig. 8 respresents both sexes of the moth; 1x is the female, 2 the male. It will be observed that they are yery unlike each other, so much so that they may readily be 134 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. mistaken for different species. Besides the disparity in size, the fore. wings of the male are transparent, while those of the female are opaque, and blue: the female also has a broad orange colored belt encircling the abdomen, which is wanting in the male. rENT. CATERPILLARS. It is gratifying to be able to note that the American Tent Caterpillar, 4 Clisiocampa Americana, has been quite scarce during the present season, as compared with former years. In fig. 9 we give a side and back view a and 6, ot this well known pest ; ¢ represents one of the ring-like clusters of eggs, and ad, the cocoon. During this month the eggs will be laid for the next years crop of caterpillars ; they are usually placed upon the smaller twigs of the trees, each ring or clus- ter containing about two hun- dred and fifty. The Forest Tent caterpillar Clistocampa sylvatica, fig. 10, has been equally scarce ; in- deed we have not met witha full-grown — speci- men of either va- riety this summer, although in past years they have swarmed on our Fig. 9. trees and fences. Whether the severity of the weather last winter operated unfavorably upon them, or whether their decimation is due to the increase of their natural insect foes, we are unable to determine ; the fact, however, 1s an interesting one. THE GOOSEBERRY FRUIT WORM. ‘There is probably no insect more troublesome to the cul- / tivator of the Gooseberry, or more difficult to contend with, Fig. 10. than the worm which attacks the fruit, popularly known as the “ goose- THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. . 135 berry fruit worm.” It is a pale shining green or reddish-green caterpillar about three quarters of an inch long, with a pale brown horny-looking head, and with a patch of a similar colour on the second segment. It lives within the fruit, making its ingress and egress through a small hole, barely big enough to allow its body to pass through ; and as there is no ~room in the enclosure in which it lives for the larva to turn itself, when danger threatens it backs out very expeditiously, and by means of a silken thread, always ready, allows itself to drop gently to the ground; but when the disturber of its quiet has gone, it draws in the thread by which it had descended, and thus regains its former position. ‘The first indication of its presence is in the premature colouring of the fruit it is operating on, and an unnatural grouping of the berries, which soon put on a withered look. On examination, it is found that the berries surrounding the one in which the insect lives have been drawn together, and bound with silken threads ; and to facilitate this binding process, such berries are usually detached from their natural position by biting through the stems, and are then held in place by the silken threads only. This insect does not confine itself to to the cultivated gooseberry ; we have found it on the wild ones as well, especially on the Prickly Gooseberry, Aides cynosbati. It also freely attacks the Currant, both the white and red varieties, and occasionally though less often, it is found on the Black Currant likewise. In the case of these smaller fruits, a single berry is not large enough for the worm to shelter itself in ; so here it draws the clusters together and lives in their midst. During the latter part of June, this worm, now full grown, lowers itself by the silken thread already referred to, to the ground, where it con- -structs a small silken cocoon amongst dry leaves or other rubbish, and within this changes to a dark brown chrysalis. It remains in this condli- tion till the following spring, when it appears late in April as a small grey moth. Fig. 11 represents the moth and chrysalis, natural size. ‘The fore wings of the moth are pale grey, with many streaks and dots of a darker shade ; the hind wings paler and dusky. The moth deposits its eggs soon after the fruit has set, and when hatched, the young larva begins to burrow at once into the fruit. ‘This insect has been very numerous during the present season. Where it once establishes itself it is very difficult to eradicate ; in proper time hand picking is the 136 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. pupa or inactive state, it is too late to apply this means now ; some good may, however, be done by raking up and burning all the dry leaves and ; £3 rubbish under and about the bushes. It has also been recommended to _ give fowls the run of such places, when they are said to scratch upand devour many of the chrysalides. In the absence of such friendly help,a top-dressing of, lime or ashes would probably prove beneficial. For fuller details in reference to this insect the reader is referred to the report of the Entonyological Society of Ontario for 1871, p. 42 and 43. DESCRIPTIONS’ OF TWO SPECIES OF ANAPHORA. BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS. In Dr. Clemens’ Tineid genus Anaphora, the fore wings are 12-veined. The submedian fold, however, seems to me to become a true vein towards the margin, giving an additional vein (vein 1b). Internal nervure, vein 1a, shortly furcate at base. Median nervure sending out vein 2 near the extremity to internal angle; and emitting 3 and 4, nearer together, on to the external margin. From the base of the wing at the middle of the discal cell, a ‘ veinlet” is emitted which is furcate before the centre of the wing, sending one branch, the lower, out. to extremity of the cell between the origin of 4 and 5, near 4, and angula- tedly connected with it, while 5 seems independant. Its upper branch, apparently the “median fold,” terminates between veins 5 and 6, An analogous “veinlet” is thrown off from the lower side of sub-costal nervure beyond the point of furcation of the median “ veinlet,” and terminates at the extremity of discal cell, and at the origin of vein 8. Veins 7, 8, 9, near together at base; 8 to apex; 9 to costa; 10 4 little removed at base; 11 thrown off near base of the wing. Hind wings 8-veined ; veins 1a and tb divaricating on to the margin. Discal cell closed by a “‘yeinlet ;’ vein 4 thrown off from a furcating median veinlet at the middle of the discal cell; 5 thrown off from the “ veinlet,” closing the cell between 4 and 6, near to 6, which latter is sub-continuous’ with the upper fork of the median cellular “ veinlet.” ‘The two internal veins are counted together. Vein 7 to apex; 8 to costa shortly before the tip. is Res: THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, etal ek: . es PEER la LO Le a ae ed _~—«—Anaphora mortipennella, Grote ~.—Labial palpi reflexed, thrown _ back over and as long as the dorsum of thorax, but not closely applied, _- thickly scaled but less so than in allied species, fuscous outwardly along the sides, dead whitish on the inside. Head and thorax above dead or , dirty whitish. Primaries pale, dirty whitish, with heavily sprinkled black scales on costal region at base, fading outwardly. A black scale patch at - extremity of discal cell, and a larger one on submedian fold, below “median vein, at about the middle of the wing ; parallel with this at base, afew black scales. ‘There is a faint sprinkling of black scales over the median nervules, and about internal angle are two or three better marked black points on the margin. Four costal black marks before the apex, the first of these above discal spot ; other costal marks towards the base of the wing. Fringes fuscous, faintly lined. Secondaries fuscous, much darker than, and strangely contrasting with, the pallid primaries. Beneath both wings fuscous with ochrey stains.. The basal joint of labial palpi is prominently dark fuscous or blackish outwardly. xpanse 25 m. m. Central Alabama. June. oa Smaller than 4. plumifrontella, and easily recognized by its pallid discolorous fore wings, which are also a little more determinate at apices and internal angle than usual. Anaphora agrotipennela, Grote ¢.—Fuscous or blackish wood brown. Labial palpi reflexed, and as long as the dorsum of thorax, a little paler inwardly, blackish outwardly. Primaries. above fuscous, blackish, with a light purplish reflection. From the base outwardly, below median vein, is a prominent pale streak fading externally, where it is diffuse and dark ochrey. It is bordered beneath at base by black scales like a dash, and surmounted and partly interrupted by a black scale patch below median nervure before vein 2. On the discal cell is an unprominent black scale patch towards the base, beyond which an obscure ochrey longitudinal median shade, sometimes lost, stretches over the nervules, and is inter- rupted at the extremity of the cell by a distinct black subquadrate scale patch. Faint blackish costal and terminal marks; fringes fuscous. Secondaries and their fringes fuscous. Beneath, both wings and body parts blackish-fuscous. .xfanse. 27 m.m. Central Alabama; June and July. Very common. I have only seen males of this species, in which the ornamentation of the fore wings above recalls that of various species of Agrotis, such as _ A. jaculifera, etc. 1 have tried to recognize in this species 4. Popeanella, 4 ane Pe Last, 138 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Clemens, from ‘Texas, but I have failed to reconcile his description with my specimens, which are not “ luteous or yellow along inner margin.” In A. agrotipennel/a, at the extremity of the median ochrey shade subtermi- nally, are a few black scale points. ‘These can hardly be the same as the row “of dark brown spots” of Pepeanella. | Neither can 1, from the description, consider the differences of colour and ornamentation as produced by any defect in the condition of Dr. Clemens’ specimens. | Recently, a specimen of 4. agrotipennella came into my room to light, upon which, even before capture, I saw several large scarlet mites. Upon pinning the insect, I found them to be five in number, moving freely over the body. When the insect settled, they collected on the dorsum of the abdomen, and were hidden by the wings. ‘The specimen did not seem to be suffering from the presence of these proportionately enormous external parasites. After the death of the moth, they left its body for the table, which they traversed in various directions with considerable celerity. I regret I did not-observe them further. \ The genus Anaphora is represented in Cuba by a species much exceeding in size our A. plumifrontelia, which latter exceeds the two species described above in expanse. Specimens of the species above ~ described are contained in Coll. American Ent. Society. [ am sure we are all grateful to Mr. Stainton for his collection, in book form, of the writings of the late Dr. Brackenndge Clemens, on North American Zineina. Within the limits of 282 beautifully printed pages, we have collected all of Dr. Clemens’ writings on this group, with memoranda of his descriptions in other families of the moths, and copies of his correspondence. No student'of North American Micro’s can afford, to be without this book, which is enriched with notes on our species by its talented editor. As a matter of international courtesy, this publica- tion deserves meritorious remembrance. From an original engraving of the head of Anaphora Popeanela, on page 60, fig. 4, we see that its palpal structure differs from that of 4. plumifrontella, with which latter A. mortipennella and A. agrotipennella coincide. MISCELLANEOUS NOTES. FemaLe Decoys.—Last summer an enthusiastic lepidopterist in Kingston put a young female Cecropia moth (Platysamia Cecropia) m a box, with wire gauze on one side, and placed it on his yerandah—which, : THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 139 » by the way, is at a considerable distance from any trees. Although my friend did not watch very long, yet, the first night he caught five males, attracted thither in some unknown and mysterious way, by their fair relative ; the second night, ten males were captured, and on the third, eight more were taken ; while, in the morning, the scattered remains of five other amorous moths, (slain doubtless by the cats), were found lying near the cage. Several specimens of Ze/ea Polyphemus were taken in the same manner. Is not this decidedly the easiest and most successful way of collecting a good harvest of these gorgeous Creatures ?—R. V. Rocers, Kingston. BLISTERING Brrries.— During the past month complaints have ‘reached us of the ravages of one of the Blistering Beetles, JJacrobasis Jabricii, Lec., (Lytta cinerca, Fab.,) on potato vines. They are said to have been very destructive in the township of Burford, destroying the tops in some localities, eating small holes all over the leaves. Fig. 12@ represents this species, the hair line at the sides showing its nat- ural size. 6 is another variety of Blistering Beetle -not yet found in Canada, but destruetive to the po- b “< tato in some parts of the bs ace United States. Complaints reached us last year from a correspondent in the eastern part of Ontario, of the Striped Blistering Beetle, Zpicaufa vittata, fig. 13, damaging, in fact almost destroying a crop of Beets. In some of the southern parts of the Western States 'they are very abundant on the potato vines, sometimes injuring them considerably. Should any of our readers meet with either of these insects in any quantity, we should be greatly obliged if they would collect a few ounces of them and for- ward by mail, as we are anxious to have their medicinal Fig. 13. : value as blistering agents more thoroughly tested than they have hereto- fore been.—W. SAauNDERS, London, Ont. STRIDULATION OF ORTHOSOMA CYLINDRICUM, Labr.—The stridulating noises made by many Long-horned beetles ( Cerambycid@ ) are well known to be produced by rubbing the posterior margin of the prothorax against 140 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. certain horny processes between it and the mesothorax, or against the base of the elytra. It is not so generally known, however, that the above named insect forms a decided exception to the rule. This species is a~ true fiddler, stridulating like the Orthopterous Zocustide by rubbing the hind femora against the elytra. Ifa specimen be carefully examined, the inside of these.femora will be found rasped from -the base to near the tip, by a number of Short longitudinal ridges, which, when played against the thin and sharp, emarginations of the elytra, produce the rather loud creaking so peculiar to this beetle. F I cannot recall any author who has published this fact, though as Prionus coriarius is called ‘the fiddler,” in Germany, that species may stridulate in the same manner.—C. V. Riey, St. Louis, July 9, 1872. P.S.—Prionus imbricornis Linn. (i. e., the dark brown form which, I believe, is labeled ob/iguicornis in Le Conte’s collection), likewise stridu- lates by rubbing the hind femora against the lateral edges of the elytra. But as the thigh in this species does not reach as far above the wing- cover as does that of Orthosoma cylindricum,we find no rasp on the inside, which is perfectly smooth ; and the noise is produced by the friction of the inner lower margin, principally near the end of the thigh, where it is slightly dilated.—C.V.R. INSECTS IN PENNSYLVANIA.—The Seventeen-year Locusts, as they are called, have made their appearance here and in the vicinity. Here, very abundantly, but diminish in numbers at Jersey Shore and Lock Haven. Further westward, I saw none. In the stage from the depot to Jersey Shore, I listened to an exposition by a physician! on the poisonous qualities of the insect in question, of the existence of which quality he_ was quite assured. ‘The lady, however, who was his inquisitor, thought it strange if the ‘‘locusts” were really so poisonous, that the children, who handled them freely, were, not more frequently poisoned. The doctor got over this by assuring the lady that they were not ‘‘aggressive.” Popular report gives the year 1865 as that of their last appearance, but this is not very reliable authority. So far as intervals of business allow me to judge, I should say that insect life is not abundant in North-western Pennsylvania this year. An Argynnis observed at Ridgway,nearly at the summit of the Alleghanies, in considerable abundance. Have not yet determined the species. Cicin: dele, principally repanda, 12 guttata, with a few purpurea, found on the banks of the Susquehanna from Schickshinny downwards. —W. V. AnpReEws, Williamsport, Pa., June, 1872. ee SE LONDON, ONT., AUGUST, 1872. No. 8 THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO. Our readers will no doubt be pleased to learn that the condition and prospects of the Entomological Society are now eminently satisfactory. The roll of membership has been increased by upwards of forty names of new members during the current year. ‘The Library, which now begins to form a very important feature in the attractions and usefulness of the Society, has been largely added to; among the rare and valuable books lately acquired, we may mention an excellent copy of Westwood’s edition of Drury’s Exotic Entomology, in three volumes, quarto, containing one hundred and fifty well executed coloured plates ; Boisduval & LeConte’s North American Lepidoptera, a scarce old book, containing 78 coloured plates ; a complete edition of Kirby & Spence in four volumes, published in 1822; a good copy of Curtis’ Farm Insects, containing 16 coloured plates, and a host of admirable wood-cuts ; Boisduval & Guenee’s Lepi- doptera, in seven volumes, handsomely illustrated ; Westwood’s Classifi- cation of Insects ; Agassiz’s Lake Superior; besides many new works of value, and sets, more or less complete, of the publications of several leading scientific societies. We aim at the formation, in time, of a com- plete library of works upon American Entomology, supplemented by the leading publications of European countries. In this object it is in the power of many of our readers to afford us material assistance. Authors’ own publications, the proceedings of Societies, gifts of books or donations in money to the Library fund, will always be most acceptable. The Society has recently transferred its quarters from the City Hall, London, where it occupied a room kindly provided free of rent for some years by the City Corporation, to more accessible and convenient apart- ments on the corner of Dundas and Clarence Streets. Members and visitors will find in these rooms the cabinets and library of the Society, and every facility for the comparison and study of specimens. The property of the Society has recently been enriched by the thought- ful bequest of its late lamented member and former Secretary-Treasurer, the Rev. James Hubbert, Professor at St. Francis College, Richmond, P.Q. Shortly before his death, which occurred in Florida, whither he had 142 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. gone for his health, he bequeathed to the Society his large cabinet of fifteen drawers, and a good useful microscope. The former will be devoted to the reception of a collection of local insects, while the latter will at all times be at the service of members for the purposes of study and investigation. t It has been a source of no small gratification to the editor and his coadjutors to-receive so many kind expressions of appreciation of their “ Annual Report to the Legislature of Ontario,” which has been recently distributed among all the members of the Society. The favorable notices, too, that haye appeared in many English and American’ publications, afford them much encouragement in the prosecution of their entomolo- gical labours, to which they regret they are unable to devote more than a_ small proportion of their time, each of them being necessarily engaged in other deeply engrossing pursuits, and having but little leisure at his com- mand. They are happy to be able to record that the issue of the CANA- piAN Enromo.ocisr during the current year has so far been regular and punctual, and they trust that it will continue to be so in future. They very gratefully acknowledge the valuable assistance they have received from many friends in various parts of the United States and elsewhere, whose contributions have given their publication a scientific status that it would not otherwise have attained. They earnestly trust that these favours will be continued to them, and that many others also will be led to join their corps of correspondents, and afford tidings of the insect world from all parts of the continent of America. : Ont Worp More.—The Secretary-Treasurer desires the attention of members in arrears to the fact that the financial year of the Society closes in September, when a report of receipts and expenditures has, by law, to be presented to the Legislature. As there are still nearly fifty who haye not yet paid their subscriptions, he trusts that this intimation will suffice, and that they will kindly send him the amounts respectively due by them at their earliest possible convenience. . DESCRIPTION OF THE FEMALE OF ANAPHORA AGROTIPENNELLA. BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS. In this sex, the labial palpi are short, not exceeding the front to which they are closely applied, porrect. In the male they are reflexed a., Jur THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 143 os and thrown back over the dorsum of the thorax, which they equal in length. In colour and appearance the sexes do not differ. In repose, the % labial palpi are closely applied to the thorax in the living speci- men, and from their pale ochrey outer colour have the effect of thoracic vitte. In my original description I call them blackish “ outwardly ;’ the exposed upper portion is pale or ochrey, else they are blackish. In the ‘dried specimen they are apt to become a little elevated. A. agrotipennella varies in the obsolescence of the discal ochrey shades, while the pale submedian dash itself is sometimes a little indistinct. I have already noted that Dr. Clemens’ 4. Pofeane//a disagrees with A. agrotipennella by, among other characters, its being described as luteous-along the inner margin ; that author’s description of 4. arcanclla better agrees, but this must be decidedly distinct also, since Dr. Clemens places 4. arcanella in a distinct section ; labial palpi shorter in the % than in the other species ; ascending but not recurved. ‘This character is totally opposed to our species, in which the 7# labial palpi are as long as in A. plumifrontella, which latter species I have taken at night at Hastings, on the Hudson, N.Y., in July. There is a certain correspondence in the position of the dark spots on the fore wings in this genus, which gives a similarity to the specific diagnoses. NOTES ON: ATTELABUS. BIPUSTULATUS, adr. BY MARY E. MURTFELDT, KIRKWOOD, ST. LOUIS, MO. In the spring of 1871, my attention was attracted by the peculiar manner in which many of the leaves of the Laurel Oak (Q. imbricaria) were rolled up. The cases thus formed were compact and _ cylindrical, varying in length from one third to one half an inch, by an average diameter of one-fifth of an inch, and very neatly finished up. Several of them were opened, and each found to contain a single, smooth, spherical, translucent-yellow egg, about 0-04 inch in diameter. Desirous of rearing the insects, I collected quite a number of the interesting little nests, and - watched, with much curiosity, for the larve to appear—not knowing, at that time, what to expect. But my observations were not rewarded; and, % : } z) a +. 9 _ after several weeks of impatient waiting, I made another examination into the contents of the now blackened and shriveled up cases, and found two or three very small larve, dead and shrunken, but evidently of some curculio, . ‘ 144 _ THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ce During the latter part of April of the present year, I again found the __ cases in considerable number on the same species of Oak; and one : evening, about the 1st of May, after sunset, I was so fortunate as to discover the parent beetle in the act of finishing up one of her nests, — trimming up and tucking in the ends with her beak. After watching her movements for a short time, I secured both beetle and case. The former was at’ once submitted to Mr. Riley for determination, and pro- nounced to be Aftelabus bipustulatus, of Yabricius. ee If one of these nests be very carefully unrolled, the wodus operandi of its construction can readily be seen. ‘The egg is first deposited near the tip of the leaf, and a little to one side ; the blade of the leaf is then cut — through on both sides of the mid-rib, about an inch and a half below ; a row of punctures is made on each side of the mid-nb of the severed por- tion, which facilitates folding the leaf together, upper surface inside, after which the folded leaf is tightly rolled up from the apex to the transverse cut, bringing the egg in the centre ; the concluding operation is the tuck- ing in and trimming off the irregularities of the ends. No trace of any’ gummy substance to assist in keeping the case in shape can be perceived, except the slight extravasation of sap caused by the punctures and pres-- sure of the beak of the little artisan. As I have never been able to observe these beetles working on their cases in the day-time, except-on the occasion referred to, when it was already growing somewhat dark, I conclude that their period of greatest activity is during the night. Observing that the cases invariably dropped to the ground a few days after completion, I collected a number, and placed them upon moistened sand in a breeding jar. By May 15th, several of the eggs had hatched, the tiny larvee produced from them being oval, translucent-white, with strong brown jaws ; they seemed to be feeding upon the dry substance of | their nest. An examination a few days later showed this to be the case, as the larvee had grown considerably, and had excavated quite a cavity in their dwelling. On opening one of the nests about the last of May, I was much surprised to find the inhabitant already in the pupa state. Several of the remaining cases—-which were by this time reduced to mere shells—contained full-grown larvze, of which the following are the general characteristics :— Average dorsal length 0.22 inch, diameter on abdominal segments a 0.06 in., tapering anteriorly from fourth segment. Color shining yellowish-- white ; thoracic segments slightly depressed on dorsum and swollen on THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 145 -venter ; abdominal segments convex above and flat beneath, each one ) divided into three irregular shallow transverse folds, lateral surfaces with + a double:row of smooth polished oval tubercles, most symetrical in form ‘ ‘and position from segments 4 to 11 inclusive ; above the tubercles on _ each segment is a deep depression ; a few fine light hairs are scattered over the general surface. Head horizontal, rounded, small—about half _ the diameter of first segment, into which it is somewhat retractile— ’ shining, translucent white; mandibles and other mouth parts reddish- brown, surrounded by longish hairs. Some of the larvze have from three to five fine purplish longitudinal lines on dorsum, the medio-dorsal one being most distinct; in others these lines are wanting. ‘They always remain curled up, and move sluggishly on one side if placed upon a flat ‘surface. The pupa is cream-white in color, 0.12 inch in length, broadly shoul- ts dered with an almost triangular outline ; thorax bent forward, beak pressed down and extending below wing cases; on top of thorax is a shallow depression surrounded with short brown hairs ; abdominal seg- ments sharply ridged and roughened with minute hairs, posterior ex- _ tremity terminates in a pair of bristly points, white, tipped with brown. The change to pupa takes place inside the larval nest, and the insects ‘remain in this state only from five to seven days, the first beetles issuing on the 2nd of June. The perfect insect is well known: a small, highly polished, black curculio with two large orange-red spots at bases of elytra. It has been figured by Harris in his ‘‘ Injurious Insects,” but his description of the cases of Atfalabus as “ of the size and shape of thimbles,” does not apply to this species, nor does he record any observations upon the habits of the larvae. I have also found the cases of this curculio on the leaves of Red and + Post Oak, and recently took a single one, some larger than the others, on _ Hazel. The Laurel Oak, however, seems to have the preference, and the zt eases formed from its leaves are much neater and more symetrical than those found on other trees. The second brood of larvae may be found early in July. _ AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE.— The Rev. C. J. S. Bethune and Mr. W. Saunders, the President and Vice- President of the Entomological Society of Ontario, have left for Dubuque - to attend the meeting of the Association as representatives of Canadian science. 146 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY Vcris CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 133. CIRRHA) gen. ov. At page 92, ante,.1 have described as Depressaria albisparsella, a species which, on examination of other specimens, I have concluded to make the type of a new genus. As stated on a preceding page, the species was described from a single captured specimen, the wings of which were not spread. The specimen was also slightly injured, so as to cause the brush on the palpi to appear to be divided, and to obscure some of the markings of the wings, which are faint even in perfectly fresh specimens. Since then I have bred and captured other specimens, and find that it differs from Defressaria in the following particulars :— The antennz are more distinctly pectinated, the brush on the palpi is long, ragged, and not divided, and the abdomen, though depressed, is not flat enough for Defressaria. Having ascertained its food plant, I have given it a more appropriate specific name, and annex the following more correct description : C. platanelia. (Depressaria albisparsella, ante, p. 92.) Dark gray-brown, the head a little paler and somewhat iridescent ; palpi and antenne dark brown; anterior wings dark gray-brown ; about the middle is a small pale or whitish spot, and there is another of the same hue and equally indistinct about the end of the disc, behind which is an indistinct whitish narrow fascia sometimes obsolete in the middle. Alar ex. 54 in ; Kentucky. The larva feeds on the underside of leaves of Sycamore trees ( Plafanus occidentalis.) It is yellowish-white, with contents green, and it lives ina roll or short tube formed of the down of the underside of the leaves. Imago in the latter part of June. DEPRESSARIA. Further study induces me to make the following additional remarks and changes of ‘the species which I have placed in this genus. Dr. Clemens, in his account of his Defressaria Lecontella, states that it is the “ly true Depressaria “he has thus far met with,” adding that “we W'sess numerous nearly allied species.” Mr. Stainton, in his edition of y. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 147 a Dr. Clemens’ papers (a copy of which he has kindly sent to me), suggests _ that these species probably belong to Cryftolechia (Dr. Clemens having Rx also suggested that they were intermediate between Ge/echia and Depres- saria).- 1 have little doubt that the majority of the species which I have a placed in Depfressaria belong to this intermediate group. But from an = unwillingness to multiply genera, I have placed them in Defressaria, _ indicating the points in which they structurally differ from that genus, and giving, when known, the food plant of the larvee, so that the insects may be identified and disposed of in other genera by future students having easier access to European specimens, and to the works of European authors. I will, however, indicate my views as to their generic affinities a little more fully. D. cryptolechiella I have already removed to Hagno, and D. albisparseila to Cirrha. D. dubitella, | am satisfied, should be removed, at least provisionally: to Gelechia; though even the elastic limits of that accommodating genus (the Micro-Lepidopterist’s ‘‘waste-paper box”) will hardly stretch to receive it. - Still it is nearer to that genus than to Depressaria. 4 yes cerceri,, At I think, will hereafter be placed in Cryffolechia, but I have not sufficient knowledge of that genus to be certain. Mr. Riley informs me that he has known the species long, and has referred it doubtfully to Gelechia. 1 think, however, that it is nearer to Defressaria. : D. bimaculella must accompany LD. cercerisella. — ~§&. Rileyella 1 consider a true Depressaria. 7 D. bistrigela, D. fusco-ochrella, D. fuscoluteella, D. obscurusella, D. _ pseudacaciella, D. bicostomaculella. 4 In these six species the palpal brush is longitudinally divided, but the » _ brush is rather too small, the anterior wings are too narrow, and the br colours are too dark brown for Defressaria, and the abdomen, though _ depressed and tufted at the sides, is hardly fat enough for Depressaria proper. Yet as I cannot place them in Gelechia, and from the divided _ brush they cannot belong to Cryfrolechia, I leave them for the present in Depressaria. The division of the brush is much more distinct in the _ living insect than in the mounted specimen. D. querciella has the same structure as the six preceding species, except that it possesses a small double tuft at the apex of the thorax. It " is not a true Defressaria, and is probably the type of a new genus. D. pallidochrela and D. versicolorella. These species have the abdomen as distinctly flattened and tufted at 148 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. the sides as the true Defressaria, and the brush is as distinctly divided. 4 Their small size, narrow fore wings, and deep emargination of the hind he wings beneath the apex, suggest doubts as to the propriety of their loca- tion in Depressaria. eS % I have described the neuration of these species as compared with — : - Depressaria in a previous paper. ae In all of these species (except duditella 7?) the wings in the living insect — 4 . . . . a are carried almost horizontally, or but little deflexed, in repose. . a eh One colourational peculiarity is common to many of the species which I have placed in Defressaria and to many species of Ge/echia ; that is, the costal pale streak at the beginning of the ciliz, and the opposite dorsal one. Another peculiarity, though possessed by some Ge/echia, is more characteristic of Defressaria : that is, the small ochreous or brown spot or spots on the disc. Gelechia dubitella (Depressaria dubitella, ante), has the discal ochreous spot, but not the costal or dorsal streaks. Dz? cercerisela has the costal and dorsal streaks and about four small ochreous spots on the disc. (By an oversight, I omitted to mer ‘9n these in the description). In D.? dimaculella, the costal and dorsal streaks are white, and there is a rather large white spot on the disc. In D. Rileyella and © D. fuscoluteella, the costal and dorsal streaks are absent, and the discal spots are minute, indistinct, and dark brown. D.? psewdacaciella has the costal and dorsal streaks, but not the dots on ‘the disc. So have D. bistrigela and D. bicostomaculella. In D. querciella, D. pallidochrella, D. versicolorella, D. fusco-ochrella, and D. obscurusella, neither the marginal streaks nor discal spots are perceptible. ; ih eh ES ee eS wet hy Though I think that hardly enough weight is given to the ‘‘ pattern of colouration,” as characteristic of genera, and even perhaps of higher groups, neverthless its value is subordinate to that of structure, and in the genus allied to Ge/echia, one is soon at a loss as to what value really should be attached to it. As the genus Ge/echia is at present constituted, I do not doubt that many, perhaps most entomologists, would place the majority of the above described species in that genus. But a-genus which ~ contains them, and such species as G. roscosuffuse/la (which Mr. Stainton says is a true Gelechia), to say nothing of such species as G. Hermonella, is certainly a hetorogeneous assemblage. Perhaps, however, that is not a very serious objection, for in my humble judgement no well defined and constant line exists between Defressaria (including in it Zxaeretia and Orthotelia) Crvptolechia, Gelechia and other allied genera, and the more , PSS ley 7 4S ; , . q aa — y THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 149 thoroughly the allied species are made known, the more completely will the supposed distinction vanish. ADRASTEIA, ge7. 70Y. The two following species resemble each other very closely, not only structurally, but in ornamentation. They are closely allied to Gelechia, or rather to some species of that genus. The second joint of the palpi is clothed beneath with a dense sfreading, but scarcely divided, brush ; the basal joint of the palpi is distinctly clavate, and the wings have distinct though small tufts of raised scales, and rows of separate raised scales not in tufts. Having but a single specimen of each species, I have not denuded the wings to examine the neuration. It, however, can be seen to approach closely that of Ge/echia, if it is not identical with it. In all other respects the genus agrees with Gelechia. A. Alexandriacella. N. sp. Head and second joint of the palpi grayish-white flecked with dark brown ; third joint dark brown, with the tip and an annulus about the middle, white. Antennz dark brown, faintly annulate with white ; thorax, to the naked eye, gray; under the lens, white, flecked densely with dark brown, and with a minute ochreous or yellowish-white tuft on each side at the tip ; anterior wings to the naked eye gray, mottled with dark brown spots and with a few small white spots; under the lens they appear dark brown, largely intermingled with grayish-white, and the white spots are seen to be four minute tufts of raised scales placed - | - An irregular white fascia, angulated in the middle towards the apex, crosses the wing at the beginning of the cilia. To the naked eye, this fascia appears as two small white streaks, one at the beginning of the costal, and the other of the dorsal cilia. Apex dark brown, with a row of small white spots around the base of the ciliae; ciliae pale luteous,.dusted with dark brown. Posterior wings pale fuscous ; abdomen pale fuscous, somewhat iridescent. Alar ex. 3% inch. Captured at Alexandria, Kentucky, in June. A. fasciella. N. sp. Head yellowish-white, dusted with dark brown ; antenne dark brown; first and second joints of the palpi dusted with dark brown, third joint dark brown, scarcely flecked with white, and white at the tip; thorax and anterior wings pale gray mottled with small dark brown spots, one of which is just within the dorsal margin near the base, another behind the 150 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. first and on the costal margin, another just within the dorsal margin, about the middle, with a small one near it on the disc, a larger one about the end of the disc, with a small one near it on the costal margin, just behind which is a narrow angulated white fascia indistinct in the middle. There is a small tuft of ochreous scales on each side of the apex of the thorax, a scattered patch of raised scales about the basal fourth of the wing just within the costal margin, another behind it near the dorsal margin, another further back near the costal margin, and a row of scat- tered raised scales within the dorsal margin. Viewed along the surface from the direction of the base of the wings, these raised tufts and scales exhibit prismatic colors. A/ar ex. $4 inch. Kentucky, in June. ERRATA.—Ante p. 127, for ‘‘costalous” read ‘costal pale ochreous.” In the description of D. pseudacacie’la, line 4, place the ; before “ espe- clally” instead of after it. NOTES ON LIMOCHORES BIMACULA, Scuad. BY C. S. MINOT, BOSTON. The following is a description of Zimochores bimacula, Scudd % , Hes- peria acanootus, Scudd., which I drew up some time ago :— Dark brown marked with chrome vellow. Above: head, thorax, abdomen and antenna black, the head and abdomen having a few yellow hairs. Both wings dark olive brown; primaries with an indistinct spot a little above and beyond the outer termination of the disk; a large patch extends over the middle third from the outer margin to the disc, and is crossed by a black velvety dash, which if continued would bisect the apical angle. Secondaries with chro’ maceous hairs over the central and basal portions. Beneath: palpi, femurs, thorax, abdomen, and the fringes of the wings whitish, both wings chromaceous. Primaries with three bright spots, and black at the basal, grey along the interior part of the wing. Secondaries with the costa slightly and the abdominal fold more or less covered with black scales and hairs. 22 taken in the last of July and first of August in company with Zuphyes metacomet, Harr., to which it is closely allied. a ae THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 1351 A INSECTS OF THE NORTHERN PARTS OF BRITISH AMERICA. COMPILED BY THE EDITOR. From Kirby's Fauna Boreali-Americana: [nsecta. (Continued from Page 115.) FAMILY ANOBID#. {1g0.] 253. ANoBlUM FovEaTUM K‘réy.—Length of body 2 lines. 2 A pair taken in Lat. 65°. This species very closely resembles 4. striatum, of which it may be regarded as the American representative. It differs principally in having a rather large excavation in the middle of the elevated back of the pro- thorax, the sides of which are armed with a triangular tooth or promi- nence. > The male is obscurely rufous, both above and below, the female is browner above. [Taken in Canada by Mr. Billings. Belongs to the genus Hadrobregmus. | 254. Cis micans fadr.—Length of body 1 line. Two specimens taken in the Expedition. Body subcylindrical, black-brown, glossy, with numerous short upright pale rather glittering hairs; minutely but not very visibly punctured. Head rather flat and lacunose ; antennae and legs testaceous. Prothorax anteriorly sinuated on each side with the middle lobe rounded and pro- jecting a little over the head; sides slenderly margined ; posterior angles rounded. Punctures of the elytra seem almost, but very indistinctly. arranged in rows. [1g1.] FAMILY SCOLYTIDA. 255. Tomicus pint Say.—Length of body 134—-2 lines. Frequently taken in the journey from New York to Cumberland-house, and also in Lat. 65”. Body cylindrical, deep chestnut, glossy, hairy underneath. Head above with scattered granules ; nose fringed with yellowish hairs ; antennz testaceous : prothorax rather oblong, angles rounded, anteriorly granu- lated with minute elevations, posteriorly punctured with scattered punc- _ tures, hairy next the head and on the sides : elytra hairy on the side, with five rows of transverse punctures next the suture, which reach only to the truncated part ; punctures of the side and apex scattered ; apex truncated 153 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. obliquely and excavated, with the external edge of the excavation armed with four denticles, of which the second and third are the largest: legs pale chestnut ; tarsi testaceous. In the other sex? the elytra are entire and unarmed, and the dorsal rows of punctures on the disk of the elytra are more numerous. Variety B. Entirely rufous, or pale-chestnut. [Quite common in Canada under bark of Pine trees. ] [192.] 256. ApaTE BiIviTTaTa A7rby.——Plate viii., fig. 5.—Length of body 134 lines. A pair taken in the Expedition. Very near A. domestica (A. limbata F.) but distinct. Body piceous or nigro-piceous, cylindrical ; underneath with some scattered pale hairs- Head rough with minute elevations or granules ; nose terminating in a transverse ridge ; antennae testaceous with a very large knob: prothorax subglobose, reddish, rough behind with numerous transverse rugosities ; before with sharp points or denticles ; elytra with several rows of punc- tures, and two luteous stripes which unite at the apex of the elytrum ; or perhaps it might be better to say, Iuteous, with two piceous stripes, one of the disk and the other of the side, but not reaching the apex: anus and legs testaceous. In the other sex the front, or rather face, is hollowed out into a con- cavity ; the prothorax is black anteriorly, and less rough from rugosities © and points. [Belongs to the genus Xy/oterus, Er. LeConte (Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., 1868) states that this species is taken from ‘“‘ Maine to Alaska. In the @ the head is concave, and the thorax finely transversely asperate before the middle; in the 2 the head is convex, and the thorax much more roughly asperate. This species varies greatly in colour, the black elytral vitte sometimes occupy nearly the whole surface, and sometimes are almost wanting.” [193.] 257. APATE RUFITARSIS Kirby.—Length of body 134 lines. Two specimens taken in the Expedition. Body cylindrical, black, hairy underneath. Head hairy; face concave; antennae pale testaceous: prothorax rufous posteriorly, granulated especi- ally anteriorly ; elytra punctured in rows, rufous, with a black humeral blotch : tarsi rufous, The face of the other sex is probably plane; and the prothorax with more prominent points and asperities. |Unknown to LeConte. | 258 ApaTe (LEPISOMUS) RUFIPENNIS Avrdy.—Plate vii., fig. 2, Length of body 134 line. Two specimens taken in Lat, 65°, “> ines = ie THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 153 et lf A it [194.] Body black, minutely punctured, hairs white, decumbent ; those of the prothorax and elytra looking like minute scales. Head with a pair of minute tubercles, not easily discovered, in the space between the eyes, anteriorly transversely impressed ; mouth and antennae pale rufous : prothorax very thickly and minutely punctured, with a rather obsolete longitudinai dorsal ridge : elytra dull-red, with several rows of larger punc- tures, the interstices of which are very minutely and thickly punctured, at the base rough with minute elevations: legs rufous. |Belongs to Pody- graphus Er. Taken according to LeConte in “ Alaska, Canada, Maine, Louisana.” ( Vide Trans. A. E. Soc., Sept. 1868, p. 169). | 259. ApAre (LEPISOMUS) NIGRICEPS X7réy.—-Length of body 1 line, A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. Smaller than the preceding. Body rufous, minutely and thickly punctured. Head black, with a very minute tubercle between the eyes ; nose impressed ; antennae and underside of the head pale rufous : elytra sculptured as in the preceding species, but the rows of punctures are less conspicuous. |Synonymous with the preceding, according to LeConte. } 260. APATE (LEPISOMUS) BREVICORNIS Avréy.—Length of body 1 line. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. Body black, covered with hoary hairs, above resembling scales. An- tennae very short with a small knob, rufous: front without a tubercle, nose not impressed ; elytra not striated. This species seems to indicate _ another section of the genus. [Unknown to LeConte.] [195.] 261. HyLurcus RUFIPENNIS Airdy.—Length of body 3 lines. Many specimens taken in the journey from New York to Cumberland- house, and in Lat. 65°. ___- Body dusky, hairy, rather glossy, punctured. Head black, confluently punctured; vertex obsoletely channelled ; antennae rufous: prothorax constricted anteriorly, and dusky-rufous ; base with a double slight sinus, and dorsal ridge terminating in an impression at the angle between the sinuses : elytra rufous, furrowed ; furrows punctured ; interstices of the furrows rough with minute elevations, especially at the base, which is inflexed : tibiae’ and tarsi dull-rufous ; the former denticulated on one side. N.B. In some specimens the elytra and anterior part of the prothorax are piceous or nearly black; in others the elytra are testaceous, and the ‘prothorax piceous and paler anteriorly. [Belongs to Dendroctonus Er. Taken in Alaska. ‘‘The punctures of the thorax are not very dense, and gf two sizes intermixed,” —Le Conte, | bae< THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. FAMILY CURCULIONIDA. [196.] 262. CALANDRA PERTINAX O/ivier.—Length of body 7 lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. ; Body obversely pear-shaped, black, naked. Head immersed in the prothorax, smooth ; rostrum rather shorter than the prothorax, compressed, impunctured, channelled above at the base and tumid ; antennae a little longer than the rostrum, scape as long as the rest of the antennae, knob pear-shaped : eyes immersed, lateral, subovate, not meeting below : pro- thorax oblong, rather narrowest anteriorly, tricostate, the two lateral costae sending a branch towards the base; four depressed broad punc- tured dull-red stripes occupy the intervals between the elevated parts ; sides a little elevated and punctured ; the punctures of the stripes and sides are whitish ; scutellum an isosceles triangle, excavated at the base : elytra oblong, very slightly furrowed with whitish punctures in the fur- rows ; suture, and alternate interstices, elevated ; the others or depressed ones dull-red : body underneath with scattered whitish punctures varying in size ; postpectus and tarsi chestnut. [Belongs to the genus Spheno- phorus Schonh., of the family Curculionide. Not uncommon in Canada.] 263. HyLospius conrusus Azréy.—Length of body 4% lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby, also in Massachusetts by Mr. Drake. [197.] Body oblong, of a dark pitch-colour, hoary from decumbent hairs, confluently more or less punctured. Rostrum thickish and rather shorter than the prothorax ; thickly and confluently punctured : prothorax _ with a dorsal levigated line not reaching the base ; disk with numerous confluent irregular excavations or wrinkles ; sides confluently punctured : elytra with ten rows of oblong deep punctures, the interstices of which are confluently punctured, mottled confusedly, except at the base, with whitish hairs: thighs armed with a short tooth ; tibiae, as in the other species of the genus, armed at the apex with an inflexed stout spine of claw ; tarsal claws reddish. 264. LEPYRUS COLON Zinn.—Length of body 6 lines. Several spe- cimens taken in Lat. 65°. Also taken by Dr. Bigsby in Canada. Body black covered with decumbent gray hairs. Rostrum arched, thickish, a little longer than the prothorax, confluently punctured, having also a dorsal longitudinal ridge, terminating between the eyes in a little narrow excavation: prothorax narrowest anteriorly, covered with minute elevations producing wrinkles, and having also a dorsal longitudinal ridge oe THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 155 Peebeen cewetee a wevemtmegpeen tee at nes neem and two oblique, rather curved stripes formed of dense white hairs: the elytra have several rows of punctures, with the interstices minutely granu- lated ; each elytrum has a discoidal white dot a little below the middle, and, in several specimens, there is also an indistinct one between it and the apex : on each side of the abdomen underneath, as in Z. arcticus, are four yellowish round spots formed of hairs. In some specimens the pubescence has a tawny hue, in others the indistinct spot is obliterated. [Taken in Canada. | [198.] 265. Lepyrus GEMELLUs A7irdy.—Plate v., fig. 7.—Length of body 7% lines. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. Body very black, covered more or less with decumbent white hairs, and also with minute tubercles. Rostrum; as in Z. Colon: prothorax ridged, confluently tuberculated, minutely punctured between the tuber- cles, marked on each side with an oblique stripe composed of white hairs: elytra confluently tuberculated, with five pairs of longitudinal streaks, converging towards the apex: the first and fifth including the rest. [199.] 266. CLEonis virratus Airby.—Length of body 314—5 lines. Several specimens taken in the Expedition. Body narrow, black, covered with decumbent hoary pile. Head thickly covered with hairs, but on each side from the eye to the insertion of the antennae, the hairs are less dense, which gives the appearance of a blackish stripe ; rostrum thick, shorter than the prothorax, obsoletely ridged, punctured : prothorax obsoletely ridged, punctured with rather large scattered punctures, often concealed by the hairs, with three blackish stripes, produced as in the head by the hairs being thinner: the elytra also have three similar stripes, and are punctured in rows: the abdomen underneath appears as if dotted with black from the same cause. ZOOLOGICAL PARALLELISM. BY PROF. JAMES r. BELL, BELLEVILLE. In making a general survey of the Animal Kingdom, it is impossible to avoid being struck by the remarkable parallelism which exists between the several orders and families, and even genera and species, that com- pose the respective classes into which it is divided, and which reveals itself in the representative types that abound throughout its whole extent. 156 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Thus if we take the mammalia as our starting point, we shall find that the carnivora are represented among the birds by the raptores, among the reptiles by the crocodiles and serpents, among the insects by the predaceous beetles, ichneumons, and dragon-flies, among the annulosa by the spiders, crabs, lobsters, &c., among the mollusks by the cuttle-fish’ and by some of the gastropods and a few brachiopods, and among the radiates by the sea-urchins, star-fish, sea-anemones, and many of the animalcule. Confining our observation to the parallelism between the mammalia and the birds on the one hand, and the insects on the other, we find that the carnivorous mammals are well represented among the Coleoptera as follows :—The felidz, the typical carnivora, by the Cicindelide, whose resemblance is acknowledged in their vernacular name of “ tiger-beetles.” The canidee, dogs, wolves, foxes, are fitly represented by the Carabide. the weasel tribe by the Staphylinidz, and the hyznas and vultures by the _ Silphidee; while the marine carnivora, the seals and whales, find their representatives in the Dytiscide and Hydroide; and the various species of raptorial birds are no less fittingly typified by the Libellulidz, ichneu- mon-flies, sphexes, and the predaceous wasps and hornets ; not forgetting the ants, which have a highly developed carnivorous organization. I shall not follow out in detail the obvious resemblances that may be observed between the pachydermatous animals and the Lucanide and other dendrophagous insects, as well as between the bovine, equine, and ovine tribes, and the gallinaceous and cursorial birds on the one hand, and part of the Scarabeidz and Chrysomelidz, and most of the Orthoptera on the other; or those not less remarkable that exist between the goat, deer, and antelope families, and the Cerambyx, Clytus, and Leptura genera. If the hints I have thrown out should induce some of my younger entomological brethren to study more closely the relation of the Insects to the other members of the Animal Kingdom, my intention will be amply fulfilled. PERSONAL. Baron OSTEN SACKEN.-——-We regret to announce that this eminent Dipterist has returned to Europe “for an indefinite period, several years, or perhaps for ever.” His last contribution to American Entomology will, ‘ THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 157 he informs us, be the Third Volume of the Monographs of N. A. Diptera, written by Mr. H. Loew, of Meseritz, Prussia, and translated by the Baron. It will shortly be published by the Smithsonian Institution, uniform with the preceding volumes. Baron Osten Sacken, as our readers are no doubt well aware, is the great, if not the only, authority of American Diptera, and was always, during his long residence in the United States, most ready and willing to afford any information or assist- ance that was sought from him. We deeply deplore his removal from us, and trust that it will only be temporary after all. He bears with him our best thanks for his many kindnesses, and our hearty wishes for his continued welfare and prosperity, wherever he may be. Mr. C. V. Ritey.—We are desired to announce to our readers that Mr. Riley is making a special study of Galls, with the intention, before long, of publishing a full and illustrated paper upon the subject. He will be glad to receive the co-operation and assistance of all who can aid him in his investigations. It is in the power of every collector to do some- thing in this way, for no one can be much afield in quest of insects without observing many specimens of these wonderful structures. Samples can be easily transmitted by mail to Mr. Riley at a very trifling expense. He expresses himself willing to assist others, as much as he is able, by exchanges, etc. He purposes henceforth making the Aadi/s of insects of all orders, and the study of Galls more particularly, his specialty. His address is C. V. RILEy, office of the State Entmologist, cor. 5th & Olive - streets, St. Louis, Mo. CRAMBID£.—Mr. W. Saunders (London, Ont.) is engaged in working up the history of the various species of Craméid@ inhabiting Canada and the adjoining States. He will be thankful for any assistance that may be afforded him by loan of specimens, and information as to locality, time of appearance, etc. HemipTrERA.—Mr. E. Baynes Reed (London, Ont.) is preparing a list of Canadian Hemiptera. As nothing has hitherto been done in this order in Canada, the co-operation of all members of the Society is much required in order that the catalogue may be rendered as complete as possible. Specimens will be gratefully received by Mr. Reed, and returned when desired. Pror. Macoun.—This gentleman started about the middle of last month upon a five weeks’ collecting tour along the North Shore of Lake 158 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Superior. He devotes his attention chiefly to Botany, but intends col- lecting Coleoptera at a few special localities. We look for some good results. ; NEW. ILLUSTRATED WORKS on AMERICAN LEPIDOPTERA’ ™ ‘The Lepidopterist of the present day—-be he merely a collector of these beautiful “ winged flowers,” or a student of the order—possesses vastly improved advantages over his predecessor of even ten years ago in the 2ccurate and artistic drawings that are being so copiously issued from the press. ‘There are now no less than three serial works in the course of publication, whose chief object is to afford faithful coloured illustra- tions of Butterflies and Moths. Foremost amongst these is a work that bears off the palm beyond all competitors in, this or any other land—one that we have often before noticed in these pages, but which we cannot too often or too highly commend —- Zdwards Butterflies of North America. ‘Vhis magnificent publication has now reached its Ninth Part, © and will with the next issue complete its First Volume. We earnestly trust that its talented author will not rest content with this splendid monument of his industry and ability, but will go on with the work till the beauties of all our Butterflies have been faithfully portrayed. Since our jast notice, two new numbers have appeared: Part viil., containing illus- trations of Wephasia menapia, Pieris Beckerit (N. sp.), P. vernalis, P. virginiensis, Argynnis Nevadensis, Grapta comma, and G. dryas ; Part ix., containing Papilio Ajax, varieties Walshit, Telamonides and Marcellus, Grapta interrogationis, varieties umbrosa and Fabricti. Next to Mr. Edwards’ work comes a new serial by Mr. R. H. Stretch, of San Francisco, Cal., entitled Z//ustrations of the Lygenide and Bomby- cide of North America, whose object is “to furnish, in a compact form, good coloured illustrations of all the species of these two families of Moths found north of the Mexican boundary, with accompanying letter- press, embodying everything of interest in relation to each species which may have appeared in print, together with additional information from original sources.” ‘Two parts out of the proposed thirty have thus far appeared ; the remainder are to be issued at intervals of about six weeks. Part i. contains good coloured drawings—not equal indeed to those in the above-mentioned work, but still very good and reliable—of eight species of A/ypia, Scepsis fulvicollis Walker, six species of Ctentucha, and THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 159 5 Psychomorpha Epimenis Drury. Part it. contains coloured figures of no less than twenty-one additional species, many of them new and rare. The price of each part is only one dollar, or with plain instead of colored plates, seventy-five cents. (Address:—R. H. Srretcu, P.O. Box 1802, San Francisco, Cal.) The third work to which we desire to draw attention is entitled *- Lepidoptera, Rhopaloceres and Heteroceres, Indigenous and Exotic ; with descriptions and coloured illustrations, by Herman Strecker,” Read- ing, Pa. It is the intention of the author to issue the work in monthly _ parts, each containing one plate. As yet we have received only the first number, which illustrates a new species of Emperor Moth, P/atysamia Glover: Strecker, and exhibits both male and female of the insect. with upper and lower surfaces. The price of each part is but fifty cents. We sincerely trust that all these handsome publications will meet with _ such hearty support from the entomologists of America as will encourage their public spirited authors to carry them on till the work is fully com- pleted. MISCELLANEOUS. Prizes FoR InsEcr COLLECTIONS AT THE APPROACHING EXHIBITIONS. -~-We are glad to observe that so much appreciation is shown of the value of Entomolozy in the formation of the prize lists of our various exhi- bitions throughout the Province. At the Provincial Exhibition, to be held in Hamilton Sept. 23—27, the following prizes are offered :— “Collection of Native Insects, with common and technical names attached, and classified so as to show those injurious and those beneficial to Agriculture and Horticulture ; 1st Prize $15 ; 2nd do $10.” At the Western Fair, to be held at London Oct. 8—11:—“* Collection of Native Insects, with common and technical names attached ; 1st Prize $10; 2nd do $8; 3rd do $4. “Collection of Native Insects, with common and technical names attached, injurious to field crops and fruits ; 1st Prize $6; 2nd do, $4. “Collection of Foreign Insects, with common and technical names attached ; 1st Prize $6; 2nd do $3.” 160 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. At the Central Exhibition, to be held at Guelph Oct. 1—4:—* Col- lection of Native Insects, common and technical names attached; 1st Prize $7 ; 2nd do $4. j “Collection of Native Insects, common and technical names attached, injurious to field crops and fruits ; 1st Prize $7 ; 2nd do $4.” HYPERCHIRIA VARIA.—The remarkable larva described by me in the CANADIAN EnToMOLOGIST, Vol. II., 28, is that of Wyperchiria varia, Walk. I have in my collection specimens of Macaria “iturata (of Europe) collected at Jamaica Plains in June and July.—C. S. Minor, Boston. Morus at Sea.—Captain Robert Fuller, of the S’ S. Northumbria, informs me that last September, when about twenty miles off Oporto, ‘weather fine,” a very considerable number of moths made their appear- ance during the evening, and settled on the masts and sails of the ship by hundreds. So numerous were they, that with one grasp of the hand you could secure four or five moths. Several specimens were caught for me ; but until yesterday I had not been able to see them. They all prove to be our common Plusia Gamma; and Capt. F. told me he did not observe any other kind on that occasion. These must have been part of a large flight, as he described them as clustering in masses all over the ship. I certainly think that many of the rare insects occasionally captured round our coasts are brought here in the above manner: after a long and almost exhausting flight over the sea, they very often gain foothold on some pas- siny vessel, and some day or two may elapse before they again take wing ; then it may often happen to be near the English coast ; the fugitive pos- sibly captured, and dubbed an English specimen, worth a considerable sum, of course. These particular insects, P. Gamma, are most common here ; but it is just as likely to happen to a continental species. Doubt- less we owe many of our present extensive list of new species to home- ward-bound shipping. — IV. H. Tugwell, in Newman's Entomologist. ADVERTISEMENT. TrinITY COLLEGE ScHOooL, Port Hope, Ont.—- Visitor -—The Lord Bishop of Toronto ; Head Master:—The Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, M.A. The course of instruction includes all the usual branches of a sound education in Classics, Mathematics, English, German, French, Natural Science, Book-keeping, Drawing and Vocal Music. Fees:—Board and Tuition, $220 per annum. Michaelmas Term will commence on Zhursday, Sept. 19th. For further information apply to the Head Master. ee ee ee ee ee, ee er ee eee Che Canadim Entomologist. VOL. IV. LONDON, ON, SEPT, 1872. No. 9 NOTES ON THE EGGS AN YOUNG LARVE OF MELITAA HARRYISII. BY W. SAUNDERS, LOND. onTARIO. For several years past, I have tried to (ptain eggs from this species by confining the females in small boxes, but yjthout success until this year, when several of these insects were taken luring the third week in June, and shut up in boxes and laid aside. They were unfortunately overlooked until the sth of July, when in one box wa, foynd a cluster of 14 eggs which were about hatching, and in aaathes 31 in one cluster, and three detached ones near it. Those in the latte, pox had not been so long laid, and their colour was unchanged, an from them the following description was taken :— Length zo of an inch, width vs of an inch, (Colour green, of rather a pale shade; nearly barrel-shaped, contractsaq towards the upper end, which has a nearly flat or slightly concave gmooth surface. The sides are ornamented with a series of sixteen raised strice placed at regular intervals, and the bottom end is somewhat flattened, and attached firmly to the surface of the box. J The other lot of eggs, which were just about hatching, had lost their green colour, and presented a- whitish hue arm ynd the sides and towards the bottom ; while the upper portion was dark: prown, from the colour of the young larva showing through the transpal-ent egg-shell. While ex- amining one of the eggs under the microscope, one of the mandibles ot the enclosed larva was thrust through the egg-sh¢,]] near the upper surface, and soon after the other appeared near by in thje same manner, and after some effort these were made to meet, and then , shortly a small opening made, which admitted of the head being partly thrust through, when the larva soon began to eat the egg around, with thie view of removing the top. The thickened striz of the egg were not. Tuptured without much effort, the points of the mandibles being thrust ithrough the interspaces, and the thicker ridge grasped and torn, after maz y endeavours, by pulling inwards. As the opening progressed, the sid 4s continued to be eaten down sufficiently to admit of the head being Ahrust through, the thinner 162 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. interspaces being easily disposed of. After tearing through two or three of the strie, the larva rests awhile from its efforts, and then begins afresh. On the upper flat. surface there appears a black forked line, which varies in different specimens, which is caused by the diverging lines on the front of the head showing through; the lines varying as the position of the head is changed. After one hour and thirty-five minutes had been spent in these efforts (including frequent rests), the top was gnawed nearly around, when the head was pushed up, and the lid tilted over. The farva now rested for about ten minutes, although there was no obstacle to its egress, and then commenced to extricate itself, by first bending its head backwards and forwards, and stretching upwards. The second segment, with the first pair of feet, was soon extricated ; the feet were placed on the side of the egg-shell, and thus a foothold gained by which to help to withdraw the third segment with the second pair. In like manner the fourth segment was soon extricated; then working its body from side to side with the head upwards, and alternately working it round with the head downwards, grasping with its jaws at adjoining eggs, or anything else within reach, the remaining segments were speedily withdrawn, the whole operation not occupying more than fiye or six minutes. . Description of young larva fresh from the egg :— Length about 25 of an inch, cylindrical. Head large, rounded ; cdlour dark greenish-brown, nearly-black, with a forked line in front like an ‘inverted Y, the diverging lines uniting a little above the middle, and the single line continued to the tip. Body above dull pale yellowish, each segment with a transverse row of slightly darker raised dots, :ach emitting a single pale brown moderately long hair ; on terminal segment is a yellowish patch above. Under surface similar? to upper ; feet pale, semitransparent; prolegs pale yellowish. Not knowing the fooci plant of this species, I tried the larvee, in vain, on a great variety of plants and shrubs, including violet, pansy, willow, grass, clover, polygonum, and purslane, changing the food about every two or three hours for a/out two days and a half, by which time all but three had died of starwation. Then on examining “ Abbot’s Notes on Georgian Butterflies,” as, published by Mr. Scudder, Can. ENT., vol. 4, p. 85, I found that the larva of zsmeria, a closely allied species, feeds on Helianthus. No time was lost in procuring some common sunflower THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 163 leaves, of which the three remaining weakened specimens at once began to eat ; two of them soon became plump and active, but the other died. After the first moult, the following description was taken :— Length 7s of an inch. Head medium size, dark brown: second segment pale on its anterior edge, brown behind, third segment brown also, the remainder of body being very pale brownish, with several round greenish-white spots on each segment. There is also, on each segment, a transverse row of pale slightly raised dots, from each of which arises a single brownish hair. By the 16th of July, the larve had again moulted, and had now grown to a quarter of an inch in length, and were thus described: Head small, bilobed, black and shining, with a few short pale brown- ish hairs. Body above brownish-black, dotted and spotted with greenish. Second segment with a transverse row of tubercles, from which arise brown or blackish hairs. Third and fourth segments each with four black branch- ing spines ; spines and branches all nearly black. From fifth to twelfth inclusive, each segment has six spines, the two upper pairs of which are black, tipped with greenish, and with a little greenish colour at base, the fine hair-like branches being black or brown. The lower pair of spines are set in a band of pale greenish-white ; where they partake of the same colour, both spines and branches, and this greenish-white stigmatal band, has a broken brownish line running through it. On twelfth segment is an additional dorsal spine, placed a little behind the others; terminal seg- ment with four spines arranged in two pairs, one above the other. Under surface paler and greenish. Feet tipped with black ; prolegs pale semi-transparent. Soon after this date, one of these larve escaped from confinement, and could not again be found ; the other soon ceased feeding, and be- came lethargic, and still continues so, but whether alive or dead now I can scarcely tell, although I fancy it is still living. From the observa- tions of Mr. Scudder on Argynnis bellona, published in the September number of the American Naturalist, and also from remarks made in cor- respondence by Mr. Edwards, who has closely watched many members of this interesting family, as well as from my own observations, it seems highly probable that most, if not all of our species of both Avgynnis and Melitea, pass the winter in the larval state, the larvee becoming lethargic while quite young. 164 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. LIST OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF CATOCALA. BY AUG. R. GROTE, DEMOPOLIS, ALA. The present list is based upon a paper on the genus Ca¢oca/a recently published in the Transactions of the American Entomological Society. The sequence of the species there adopted is here retained, with an unimportant change in a single instance for convenience of reference. The species are grouped according to the colour and design of the hind wings. Such an arrangement must, to a certain extent, be arbitrary, yet little violence seems to be done to the general affinities of the species by its adoption in this genus. With regard to the position of the species with black hind wings, it must be conceded that they are most nearly allied to the species with yellow secondaries. For instance, C. epione resembles C. consors; C. Robinsonii, C. habilis, etc. But I inaugurate the genus with the black winged species from the consideration that such species are not found in other continents, and that in North America the genus attains its fullest representation. I allow them to precede the more typical specific forms, such as certain of the red winged species, and conclude with the yellow winged Catoca/z, as has been customary with regard to the European species. From the Atlantic district we have at. least one strictly representative species. This is C. relicta, which repre- sents the European C. fraxini in our fauna. But I do not know C. Walshii, and thus have not been able to decide upon the degree of relationship between the red winged species of the two Continents. In the following list, the names of species not known to me in nature, are followed by a dash (—). Those hitherto found in Canada are pre-’ ceded by an asterisk (*). Mr. Saunders has kindly enabled me to add to the number of species hitherto known to me from various points in Canada. The Californian and Texan species are separately indicated ; the rest are from the Atlantic district. I have not cited Mr. Walker's erroneous determinations in this genus, elsewhere pointed out, from a desire to avoid increasing the synonymy. While our collections from the Territories are as yet scanty, we must expect the discovery of many new species of the genus. Of the fifty-nine (59) here enumerated, ten (10) are known to me only by description. In the State Collection in St. Louis, I have been shown a specimen of C. Robinsonit taken in Missouri. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 165 CATOCALA, Ochsenheimer. t. Hind wings black and unbanded above with blackish fringes. INSOLABILIS, Guence. 2. Hind wings black and unbanded above with white fringes, some- times interrupted with black. *EPIONE, Westwood. Noctua epione, Drury. LACHRYMOSA, Gueztee. RosINsonil, Grote. *VIDUATA, Guenee. Catocala vidua, Guenee. DESPERATA, Guenee. ? Phalena vidua, Smith. RETECTA, Grote. FLEBILIS, Grote. TRISTIS, Edwards. 3. Hind wings black above, with a white band. *RELICTA, Walker. 4. Hind wings various shades of red above, with a black median band. CALIFORNICA, Zdwards. (California). STRETCHII, Behr.— (Virginia city). *BRISEIS, Edwards. ADULTERA, Afinze.— (California ; teste Lederer). IRENE, Behr.— (Ft. Tejon). *unljuGa, Walker. JuNcTURA, Walker. Watsuil, Adwards.— *PARTA, Guencee. COCCINATA, Grote. *ULTRONIA, Guenee. Eunetis ultronia, Hubner. *AMATRIX, Guenec. Lamprosia amatrix, Hubner. Catocala selecta, Walker. var. Catocala nurus, Walker. *CARA, Guenee. *CONCUMBENS, Walker. MARMORATA, Edwards. (Ureka). 166 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. *ILta, Guenee. Phataena iia, Cramer. UXOR, Guence.— (an spec. praec. ?) 5. Hind wings orange above with a median black band. ZoE, Behr.—- (Searsville). INNUBENS, Guenee. var. Catocala scintillans, G. & R. 6. Hind wings black above, with a narrow even yellow band. *CEROGAMA, Guenee. 7. Hind wings yellow above, with a median black band. *NEOGAMA, Guenee. SUBNATA, Grote. PIATRIX, Grote. PALAEOGAMA, Guwenee. var. Catocala phalanga, Grote. HABILIS, Grote. CONSORS, Guenee. Phalaena consors, Smith. PONDEROSA, G. & R. Catocaia nebulosa, Edwards. MULIERCULA, Guenee. BADIA, G. & &. *ANTINYMPHA, Walker. Noctua paranympha ~ Drury. Ephesia antinympha, Hubner. Catocala affinis, Westwood. Catocala melanympha, Guenee. SERENA, Edwards. ILLECTA, Walker. *CLINTONII, Grote. NUPTIALIS, Walker.— ABBREVIATELLA, Grote. Texas. FREDERICI, Grofe. Texas. MICRONYMPHA, Guenee. *POLYGAMA, Gweviee. AMASIA, Westwood. Phalaena amasia, Smith. (Upper figure). THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 167 FORMULA, G. & &. Phalaena amasia, Smith. (Lower figure). CONNUBIALIS, Guence.— GRYNEA, Walker. Catocala nuptula, Walker. *PRAECLARA, G. & R. FRATERCULA, G. & R. *mMINUTA, Edwards. var. Catocala parvula, Edwards. GRACILIS, Ldwards. Catocala similis, Edwards. 8. Hind wings yellow above without a median band. *ANDROPHILA, Guencee. Corisce amica, Hubner. LINEELLA, Grote. MESSALINA, Guence. PHYLLOXERA VASTATRIX IN PORTUGAL. The Gardeners’ Chronicle of the 20th inst. records a meeting of the Scientific Committee of the Royal Horticultural Society on the 17th inst. The following communication formed part of its proceedings :—“ From the Foreign Office came a copy of a communication from Her Britannic Majesty’s Consul at Cintra, alluding to the appearance of the new Vine disease in Portugal ; one vineyard, producing an average quantity of 70 pipes, last year only produced one pipe, the total loss in the Douro district being estimated at 500 pipes.” In connection with this com- munication, it appears desirable to mention that a trade circular of the 12th inst. directs attention to a pamphlet from Oporto, published in June last (by Ernesto Chardron, Rua dos Clerigos), which treats at length of the same insect pest. This pamphlet, although it adds no new facts to the natural history of Phyloxera vastatrix, as ascertained by Westwood, Planchon, Lichtenstein, and Riley, has the merit of giving the locality where the insect first appeared in Portugal. It appeared first in the parish of Gouvinhas, where its ravages have been so great that one quinta, planted in 1842,,.producing in ordinary years 50 pipes of wine, was reduced in 1870 (otherwise a good year) to two pipes only. 168 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. The question arises, how did the PAy/oxera first reach Portugal? It seems to me that there are only two likely means of conveyance in this instance. It must have got there, either in the egg or larval state, on canes imported from abroad. Or if such has not been the case, I presume winged gravid females have been carried from the infected districts of France into the vineyards of the Alto Douro; or perhaps the last-named locality has served as starting place for the French ‘“Vignobles,” after the presumed arrival of the insect from America. ; England, France, and Portugal are now infested ; how long Spain will remain free from the plague no one can say. Lately the PhyWoxera has made its first appearance in Switzerland, in the cantons of Argovie, Schaffhousen, Zurich, and Thurgovie; and there can be now but little hope that the Rhine and the Moselle districts will escape much longer. The fact of the matter is, that even leaving Nature’s own operations out of the question, the trade and exchange of choice varieties of hothouse Vines and hardy seedlings are now so extensive, that man is the real carrier of the pest. Is it asking too much to call for international co-operation in the checking of the plague, universal as it is sure to become? One would think that the threatened destruction of wine-growing all over Europe and America is an evil, not only to the nations concerned, but of universal consequence. Governments there are which are enlightened enough to offer enormous prices for a sure remedy to destroy the insects ; but why not fight the enemy aé ovg, by strictly ascertaining and confining its depredations to its present centres of dispersal and eradicating it there ? Much might be done by stopping the distribution of canes and seedlings from countries at present occupied by the PAy/oxera. If some such measure were adopted on international grounds by all countries concerned, one fruitful source of propagation would be closed up. Local energy might then be applied to the task of overseeing the districts attacked, and doing battle with unforseen arrivals in fresh localities. Means have been found effectually to stop the importation of domestic animals affected by certain diseases. Surely rules could be devised to bar the distribution of cultivated plants when found to be accompanied by their insect foes. It is the plain interest of the viticulturist, as well as that of the public, to agitate until protective international measures are taken in this grave THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 169 matter ; and I feel convinced that future generations will honour the State which takes the lead of a movement to counteract a disease of such alarming influence over the prosperity of a widely spread and, until lately, remunerative culture.—ALBERT MULLER. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 150. GELECHIA. This huge genus comprehends insects of great variety of size and structure, but unfortunately it has not yet been found practicable to sub- divide it. It contains, no doubt, material for several genera, and for the convenience of the student, if for no other reason, its subdivision is ¢he desideratum in microlepidopterology. The young student who finds a micro with the palpi simple or but scarcely at all thickened with scales beneath, the fore wings comparatively narrow, and the hind wings deeply excised beneath the tip, and is told that it is a Gelechia, may well be astonished when he finds a larger insect, with the hind wings not at all excised beneath the tip, and the palpi overarching the vertex, with a large brush beneath the second joint, which may even present some appearance of longitudinal division, and is told that it, too, is a Gelechia. Several of the species which I have placed provisionally in Degressaria, some entomolo- gists would, no doubt, place in this genus. The species hereinafter described belong, with two or three exceptions, unquestionably to Ge/echia. Possibly, the entomology of other localities may furnish the connecting links between these species and those that I have placed in Defressaria, but I have not met with the connecting links, and the two groups of species seem to me to be as essentially distinct as Gelechia roseosuffusella, Clem., or G. Hermanella, Stainton, are from Defressaria albipunctella, as figured by Stainton. A few of the species, however, described below, do not belong to the group represented by G. roseosuffusella; but to those having a small brush on the second joint of the palpi. G. thoraceochrella.. N. sp. ~ Second joint of the palpi with a small but distinct brush; palpi dark brown, ochreous along the inner surface and the second and third joints tipped with ochreous; apical half of the tongue yellowish; antenne 170 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. annulate with ochreous and brown; head silvery, tinged with pale purple and flecked with dark brown; ¢horax ochreous; anterior wings dark grayish brown, with darker brown spots and somewhat sprinkled with ochreous. Alar ex. xs inch. Kentucky, in June. At first glance this species is likely to be mistaken for G. fuscopulvella fost, but it is much darker in color and the reddish-ochreous thorax also distinguishes it. G. obscurella. -N. sp. Palpi much thickened adhe almost brush like; palpi dark brown, mixed with ochreous ; ochreous on the internal surface, and extreme tip of third joint ochreous ; head silvery with a faint purple tinge, and flecked with brown ; antennz annulate with ochreous and brown; thorax and anterior wings ochreous, densely flecked with dark brown, in some lights showing a very faint roseate tinge. Alar ev. vs inch. Kentucky, in June. This species also might, on a casual glance, be mistaken for fusco- pulvella post, but the absence of anything like distinctness or definite form in the markings of the wings distinguishes it. It is a very plain and inconspicuous insect. G. fuscopulvella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi almost forming a brush, externally dark brown, with dark ochreous intermixed, internally pale ochreous ; terminal joint dark brown, with an almost equal quantity of yellow ochreous, intermixed; antennae alternately annulate with ochreous and brown; head and anterior wings dark yellowish-ochreous, dusted with dark brown, and with a faint roseate tinge, the apical portion being about equally ochreous and dark brown. There are three distinct dark brown costal spots, the second of which is about the middle ; the first is most distinct, and is connected with some irregular dark brown streaks on the disc. See G. thoraceochrella ante. Alar ex. in. In Kentucky in June. G. fuscomaculella. NN. sp. Palpi with the second brush scarcely brush-like, ochreous and fuscous, mixed in about equal qualities, tipped with pale ochreous ; head ochreous, dusted with brown ; thorax brown; anterior wings dusted with brown, which is aggregated into irregular spots and blotches. A/ar ex. % inch. Kentucky. G. quercinigracella. NV. sp. Ochreous-gray ; second joint of the palpi not at all brush like, but some- what thickened or incrassate towards its apex beneath; palpi dark brown, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Vee with a little ochreous intermixed ; third joint annulate with pale ochreous at the base, middle and tip ; head ochreous-gray ; antennae with alternate annulations of dark brown and pale ochreous ; thorax and anterior wings ochreous-gray. There is a brownish patch at the base of the wings, an oblique dark brown streak from the costa, not far from the base, crossing the fold, but not quite reaching the posterior margin ; extreme costa dark brown, a dark brown costal spot about the basal third, another larger one about the apical third, the wing between the latter and the dorsal margin being overlaid with dark brown; apical portion of the wing densely dusted with dark brown; ciliae gray, with some intermixture of dark brown scales. Alar ex. % inch. Kentucky. The larva is slender, white, with a black spot behind each eye, and two small black ones, one above the other, on each side of each segment. Later in larval life, the black spots on the first segment spread, and cover the posterior margin of the segment, becoming confluent on top ; and the larva becomes dirty yellowish, with small black spots on each segment, and the space between the segments (or rather where the segments pass into each other), becomes suffused with pink. It feeds on the leaves of the ‘* Black Jack” (Quercus nigra) in the latter part of June and in July. G. grisella. WN. sp. Gray, densely dusted with dark brown, base of the costa dark brown ; head but faintly dusted; antennae dark brown ; palpi with the second joint densely clothed beneath, but scarcely brush-like, dark brown exter- nally, with a white annulation near the apex of the second joint, and another at the base of the third. Adar ex. ys inch. Kentucky. Imago in May. G. albistrigella. lV. sp. Second joint of the palpi but slightly thickened beneath towards the apex: Entire insect (except as stated below) dark brown in some lights, faintly tinged with purple, green, or bronze ; a small oblique white costal streak just before, and a few indistinct whitish scales or small spots in the apex, near the dorsal ciliae; ciliae pale fuscous, with a dark brown hinder mar- ginal line before their middle. A/ar ex. 34 inch. Kentucky, in June. The wings are not spread in my single specimen, and I have not examined the neuration. It is rather a pretty species,which in its general appearance and style of ornamentation, seems to approach Srrodiséa, Clemens. G. suffusella. LN. sp. Second joint of palpi slightly incrassate beneath towards the apex ; both bf be THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. joints silvery white, with a fuscous band before the apex of the second, © and with two fuscous annulations on the third, and extreme apex fuscous ; head pale ochreous ; antennae with alternate ochreous and brown annu- Jations ; anterior wings pale ochreous, suffused near the base with pale fuscous, behind which is an oblique pale band across the wing, and — behind that an oblique fuscous band, behind which the wing is paler again, with another large pale fuscous patch before the beginning of the costal ciliae, and the apex dusted with fuscous ; the whole wing is suffused, according to the light, with roseate, silvery, pale golden or pale green; the golden tinge is most distinct along the dorsal margin. Alar ex. ¥g inch. Kentucky, in May. G. discomaculella. LN. sp. Second joint of the palpi but little thickened beneath ; palpi dark brown, with dark ochreous intermixed. Antennae brown; anterior wings gray, densely dusted with brown, the dusting more dense towards the apex, with a small triangular ochreous patch at the beginning of the costal ciliae, and a small one opposite on the dorsal margin. Jn some lights, two minute golden spots are visible, one about the midde,and the other about the end of the disc. ; Alar ex. ¥g inch. Kentucky, in May. G. aurimaculela. IN. sp. ; Very near the preceding species but distinct, I think. Second joint of the palpi dusted with white, third joint but little dusted, both joints brown ; head silvery, dusted with dark brown, and with metallic hues ; thorax and anterior wings pale ochreous, almost whitish, mixed in about equal ‘quantity with dark brown, which in places is aggregated into patches and which forms an oblique fascia about the basal fourth of the wing; apical half of, the wing mainly dark brown with a white costal spot at the beginning of the ciliae and a smaller opposite dorsal one ; On the dis¢ are three minute and indistinct golden yellow spots or streaks. Alar ex. ¥s inch. Kentucky, in June. G. ? curvilineedla. LN. sp. Palpi simple, pale gray mixed with brown; antennae pale gray, annu- late with brown; head, thorax and wings dusky gray, sprinkled with hoary ; a hoary spot on each side of the thorax above the wings; two or three indistinct, dusky, longitudinal short streaks on the wings, the most distinct of which is on the fold before the middle. Z.some lights there is a tolerably distinet curved or zig-zag line beginning at the base of the wing, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 173 passing thence to the costa, thence to the fold and backwards and forwards Jrom the costal margin to the fold, to about the apical fourth, where it sud- denly curves up to the dorsal margin at the beginning of the cilia. In some lights this line is invisible. A/ar ex. 34 inch. Kentucky, in May. G. Physaliella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi a little incrassate beneath. ower face creamy yellow ; palpi, head, thorax, and anterior wings dark brown, a little bronzed, rather indistinctly dusted with ochreous, and still more indis- tinctly with white. A/ar ex. ss inch. Kentucky. The larva mines the leaves of the “Ground Cherry” (Piysalis Viscosa) in September, and perhaps earlier, as I found there many empty mines. It mines the under surface, and produces a tubicular swelling of the upper surface. It pupates among leaves on the ground, and (in the breeding cage at least) the imago conceals itself among the leaves and “trash” on the ground. I have never seen any specimens except the two that I succeeded in rearing; but the mines are abundant. The following are my notes about the larvae :—“ Larve now (Oct. 6th) about Y inch long; one of these in the mine appears bright bluish-green, with the head yellowish ; another is pale bluish or bluish-green, almost white, suffused with pink upon the back, head pale brownish. Oct. 7, one of them has left the mine; it is 14 inch long, robust, deep purple, with the head and ‘shield’ of the first segment green. Two imagines April 14.” They were kept in a warm room. G. quercivorella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi slightly incrassate beneath. Palpi very dark brown, mixed in almost equal proportion with white. Head white, rather sparingly flecked with dark brown. Antenne dark brown, annulate with white ; thorax and anterior wings dark iron gray, with a blackish costal spot about the middle of the costa, and another smaller one at the begin- ning of the ciliz, and with other irregular and irregularly disposed dark brown spots on the wing; the dorsal margin paler gray. Hind wings of a leaden hue, faintly tinged with purplish. Adar ex. ¥s inch. Imago in June in Kentucky. The larva is white with bright red spots, closely resembling that of G. Hermonella. It feeds on Oak leaves, and when first observed, was forming a closely-fitting tube of white silk around itself on the under side of the leaf. This tube it closed in a day or two after, and by some means spun a band of brown silk across the middle of it on the outside, Fs THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. G. longifasciella. Clem., Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila., 1863, p. 12. Telphusa curvistrigella, ante p. 133. After my former paper was in the hands of the printer, I became satisfied that the species which I had made the type of this genus could be nothing else than G. Jongifasciella, Clem. It was discovered unfor- tunately too late to prevent the publication of the species as Tée/phusa curvistrigela. The genus Gelechia has become so large and unwieldy, and contains such a variety of size, ornamentation and _ structure, that the temptation is great to put every thing that will admit of it in another group. If this species had not been before described, I think I should permit it to remain as the type of the new genus Zé/phusa, as I placed it in the preceding number. But as Dr. Clemens (a better ento- mologist by far than I claim to be), has placed it in Gelechia, and that genus comprehends such a diversity of forms that it may include almost any thing of a certain (or rather uncertain) general structure, and as on further observation I am satisfied that this species really approaches nearer than I had supposed to the true Gelechia (G. roseosuffusella, Clem., being my type), I desire to retract my generic and specific names, so that the species will stand as described by Dr. Clemens, G. dongifasciella. It is not, however, a true Gelechia of the roseosuffusclla type. G. variiella. NN. sp. White ; apical half of the forewings suffused with golden yellow, usually deeply so, sometimes faintly, becoming deeper towards the apex, and with indistinct whitish spots and transverse streaks in the apical part. Four distinct dark brown costo-apical spots at the base of the costal ciliz. In many specimens there is a small, rather indistinct, brown costal streak just before the ciliz ; a small very oblique dark brown costal streak, placed about the middle of the costa, is continued along the costa towards, and, in many specimens, to the base ; sometimes (in perhaps half of my specimens) this streak is absent. In some, the entire costa is dark brown or pale brown; in others, the entire costa is golden yellow ; in others it is white. Sometimes the two costal streaks are golden instead of brown, and in these specimens there is a very narrow long and oblique white costal streak behind the two yellow ones in the apical part of the wing. Head and its appendages white, but in some specimens the antenne are faintly suffused with brown. A/ar ex. vs inch. Kentucky. This is an exceedingly variable species ; the only constant characters seem to be that the species is white, with more or less of the apical part of the wing golden, with a few dark brown spots at the base of the costal THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 175 cilize, and with two or three small oblique brown or golden costal streaks. In many specimens there is a circular dark brown spot on the dorsal margin just before the cilia. Two or,three of the best marked varieties, if taken at different times and in the absence of connecting links, would undoubtedly be considered distinct species. The larva is unknown, and I have met with the imago but once. ‘Then it was swarming in great numbers in the grass and around the trunk of an Elm tree. The space occupied by them did not exceed twenty yards square. G. obliquistrigela. Anarsia obliquistrigella, ante p. 65. G. apicistrigella. Parasia apicistrigella, ante p. 66. The neuration of the first of these insects is exactly that of Anarsia ; that of the second is exactly that of Parasia. By attaching too much importance to the neuration, I was induced to place them in these genera respectively. ‘The other characters, however, are those of Gelechia, and I have accordingly transferred them to that genus. The second joint of the palpi is somewhat thickened beneath in both. INSECTS OF THE NORTHERN PARTS OF BRITISH AMERICA. COMPILED BY THE EDITOR. From Kirby s Fauna Boreali-Americana: Insecta. (Continued from Page 155.) GENUS MACROPS. Body oblong, winged. Rostrum shorter than the prothorax, subcylin- drical, somewhat arched, having a dorsal longitudinal ridge ; bed of the scape of the antennz oblique reaching from near the apex of the nostrum to the middle of the eye; antennz apical, longer than the head, eleven- jointed ; scape as long as the remainder of the antennz, incrassated at the apex, reaching the eye ; two next joints longer than the subsequent ones, obconical ; the following four very short, top-shaped ; the four last forming a subovate knob; eyes lateral, subimmersed, long, forming, in some measure, an isosceles triangle with the base rounded, and the vertex downwards : prothorax subglobose ; antepectus emarginate, sides obso- letely lobed: scutellum very minute, triangular; coleoptera oblong: 176 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. thighs unarmed ; tibiz armed with a very minute incurved spine or spur ; tarsi not dilated, fpepiibiree te joint bipartite. : At first sight the- species of this little. group would be set aside as belonging to Sifona Germer, with which they possess many characters in ~ common ; a closer inspection, however, will satisfactorily prove that they belong to different genera. In the genus just named, the rostrum is shorter, thicker, and channelled ; the knob of the antennz. consists only of three joints, the bed.of the scape turns below the eye ; the eye itself is round: the antepectus is not emarginate, or lobed; the tibia have no incurved spine. [200.] 267. Macrops MACULICOLLIS A?rdby.—Plate viil., fig. 4.— . Length of body 2 lines. Two specimens taken in Lat. 65°. Body black, rather hoary from decumbent hairs and scales. Rostrum very minutely punctured ; ridge reaching from the base to the apex ; stalk of the antenne a dull-red: prothorax minutely and thickly punctured, obsoletely ridged, having the sides, especially at the base, covered with little white scales: elytra furrowed, furrows punctured : tibia, tarsi, and base of the thighs of a dull obscure red, posterior thighs on the inside more distinctly rufous. 268. Macrops vitticotus Airby.—Length of body 2% lines. A single specimen taken. Body covered with brownish-black scales. Rostrum ridged at the tip, the rest covered with scales, which perhaps conceal the remainder of the ridge ; stalk of the antennz rufous: prothorax with three narrow pale stripes, the lateral ones a little waved: scutellum pale; elytra slightly furrowed ; furrows minutely punctured ; mottled with pale: tibie and tarsi, the former obscurely, rufous. [201.] GENUS LEPIDOPHORUS. Body covered with scales. Antennae longer than the head, eleven- jointed ; scape as long as the remainder of the antennae, reaching to the eye, growing gradually thicker towards the apex ; pedicel as long as the two following joints, obconical ; the remaining joints of the stalk rather top-shaped ; knob three-jointed, ovate, acute; rostrum shorter than the prothorax, thick, subcylindrical, straight; bed of the scape of the antennae very short, not reaching the eye ; eyes subobtusangular, with the vertex downwards: prothorax rather longer than wide, barrel-shaped: elytra taken together oblong-oval: scutellum punctiform: thighs clubbed, un- armed ; tibiae armed at the apex with a short incurved spine ; penultimate joint of the tarsi bilobed. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 177 269. LEPIDOPHORUS LINEATICOLLIS Avrdy.—Length of the body 2% lines. Several specimens taken in Lat 65°. Body black, underneath hairy with little whitish round scales and hairs of the same colour intermixed. Head and rostrum behind the antennae covered with similar scales: antennae dusky-red: prothorax dusky, confluently .punctured with three whitish longitudinal narrow indistinct stripes formed of minute scales: elytra mottled ‘with whitish and dusky round scales ; slightly furrowed with punctures in the furrows ; at the apex, in the deflexed part, there is a series of white 11zid minute bristles between each furrow: legs hairy, reddish brown, thighs darker. [202.] 270. TRACHYPHLG@:US MELANOTHRIX A77rdy.—Length of the body 234 lines. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. Body really black, but quite covered with a brown powdery substance, resembling mud or dirt. Head impressed between the eyes ; rostrum longer than the head, and nearly as wide, emarginate and hairy at the end ; antennae rufous, scape covered with brown powder: prothorax transverse, obsoletely channelled, with several short rigid black bristles on each side of the channel arranged nearly in rows: elytra obsoletely furrowed with slight punctures in the furrows, and between each furrow is a row of longer rigid black truncated bristles; a few white ones are ‘discernible at the apex: legs bristly, with white bristles, rufous, but the thighs are covered with powdery scales. [203.] 271. PACHYRHYNCHUS (RHINARIA) SCHONHERRI A7rdy, — Length of the body 5—7 lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. Also in Georgia? by Mr. Abbott. : Body thickly covered, especially underneath, with hoary pile. Antennae shorter than the head; eyes brown: prothorax with three faint whiter stripes : scutellum white ; elytra with nine rows of punctures, and at the ‘base of the lateral margin is a portion of a tenth row, between the second and third ; in the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth rows the pile is thicker than in other parts of the elytrum, so as to form three white stripes, on these stripes there are also four rows of distant black dots on each elytrum. [Not uncommon in Canada. | [204.] 272. ATTELaBus simILis Avrdy.—Length of the body lines. Taken in Canada by’Dr. Bigsby. This species is nearly the transcript of 4. curcudlionoutes, for which I at first mistook it, but a closer inspection convinced me it was distinct. They agree in being black, glossy, and naked ; in having a red prothorax and elytra, the latter with several rows of punctures ; in having the head 178 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. and rostrum more or less punctured, with curved impressed lines on each side just above the eyes, in the disk of the front; the prothorax also in both is minutely punctured, and the cubit arched and internally serrulated. ‘They differ, however, in several respects. In 4. curculionoides the head “3 is wider in proportion, the occiput black, levigated, with a central im- ¥ pression ; the curved lines of the front not distinctly punctured; the stalk of the antennae rufous; the prothorax at the base is streaked with transverse linear impressions ; the scutellum is nearly black, and the) interstices of the rows of punctures of the elytra are irregularly punctured. In A. similis the hinder part of the head which is punctured and wrinkled, and scutellum are rufous, a transverse impression divides the occiput from the front; the curved lines are distinctly punctured ; in the front between the eyes is a wide channel; the antennae are piceous; the prothorax is not streaked at the base: and the elytra between the rows of punctures are levigated. [Synonymous with 4. ava/is Thg.; taken m Canada. | 273. ATYELABUS BIPUSTULATUS /aér.—Length of the- body 2 lines. ‘Taken in Canada, near Lake St. Clair, by Dr. Bigsby. [205.] In sculpture this species for the most part agrees with A. cur- cutonoides, except that there is an impression between the eyes, and a pair on the disk of the prothorax. The whole of the body is very black, except the shoulders of the elytra, which are covered by a large oblong red spot, the anterior thighs are armed with a minute tooth: the disk of the coleoptera, or elytra taken together, towards the base is depressed ; and the scutellum is obversely triangular, the vertex of the triangle peint- ing towards the head. [This and the preceding species are both de- scribed and figured in Harris’ Injurious Insects, pages 65 and 66 ; taken in Canada. | 274. APOTOMUS ovatus Faér.—Length of the body 1% line. Var- iety B taken by Dr. Bigsby near Lake St. Clair. [206.] Body very short, between pear-shaped and ovate, deep violet, naked, minutely punctured. Head black, rostrum levigated: prothorax somewhat lozenge-shaped, emarginate anteriorly, very thickly and con-— fluently punctured, with a levigated discoidal longitudinal line: elytra furrowed, furrows punctured. VarIETY B. Blue-green. [Belongs to Aételabus Fabr., or Pterocolus Sch. ] 275. ANTHRIBUS FASCIATUS O/ivier.—Length of the body 4 lines. Taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. ‘eee THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 179 Body black, covered more or less with brown decumbent short hairs. Rostrum angular, thickish, dilated at the tip, below the antennae covered thickly with snow-white decumbent pile ; antennae almost as long as the thorax, rufous, knob dusky-brown ; front marked with two whitish dots, one adjoining each eye on their upper side: prothorax wrinkled with a transverse discoidal impression, and near the base with an elevated transverse ridge: elytra wrinkled with a discoidal tubercle near the base, near the apex adorned with an irregular angular band composed of snow- white decumbent pile : abdomen whitish with a double indistinct series of black dots : tibiae with a white ring. Variety B. With the tubercles of the elytra less conspicuous ;_ the abdomen snowy-white ; thighs variegated with white. I have no memorandum whence I received this variety. It is smaller, and probably American. MISCELLANEOUS. Mr. Couper’s Lasrapor Tour.—The following notice lately ap- peared in the Afontreal Herald :-— “ GREAT ENTOMOLOGICAL Loss.—Mr. Couper, the Canadian Entomo- logist, who left Montreal on the roth of May last to collect butterflies and moths in Labrador, has had his splendid collection of rare specimens destroyed by some of the Indians, who took revenge in this way for some statement made by him in the Quebec Chronicie, about seven years ago, regarding the destructive practice of the tribe in spearing salmon on the then spawning grounds.” In a recent letter from Mr. Couper, who has returned from Labrador, he confirms this statement. He informs us that “a six weeks’ collection, consisting of 36 specimens of Cofias Interior; 4 species of Argynnide (100 specimens) ; 5 species of Lycenide (200 specimens,) and a quantity of other material, amounting to about 4oo in all, were destroyed by Indians, who, I suppose, broke open my trunks, &c. during absence from camp. At all events the destruction took place between Mingan and Seven Islands, on the north shore. The loss was not discovered until I examined the cases after leaving the latter place. I was informed by the lessee of the salmon fishery at Mingan that my life was not safe,as I helped the fishery guardian to prevent the Indians from spearing salmon on the Mingan river, and also wrote as above stated seven years ago. Before I left Mingan, I went to the Pere who attends to their spiritual 180 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. , wants, and he was partly aware of my situation, but there being no schooner going west from the place at the time, he kindly sent me off in a schooner belonging to the Mission, in company with two Indian sailors, » who brought me to Bersiamits. I was therefore compelled to leave Min- gan about the 2oth of July, while I was searching for Colias interior, Argynnis Boisduvali and Lycena Scudderi. The specimens collected on Anticosti were not with the destroyed collection—they are safe—and are all I can send my subscribers this year, but, if God spares me, it is my intention to return next May to collect the lost species, which can be obtained without going into the section of country occupied by these Indians. As soon as | send off the material to my subscribers, I will write an article on the Entomology of Anticosti.” ; We deeply regret to hear of the severe loss Mr. Couper has thus sus- tained, and cannot but admire his perseverance in determining to revisit these northern districts next year to endeavor to replace his lost material. We sincerely hope he will be eminently successful. We also hope soon to be able to furnish our readers with the promised paper from Mr. Cou- per’s pen,—Ep. C. E: LipyTHEA MOTYA.—I captured on the 2nd of September, near Hobo- ken, N. J.,a Libythea motya (Bois & Lec,) at least I presume it to be that species, that being the only one given to the U. S. in Kirby’s new Catalogue. I should be glad to learn through the columns of, the CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST in what portions of North America this butter- fly has been found. The specimen captured by me is very close to Z. Myrrha (Godt.,) the habitat of which is the East Indies. It is, however, somewhat smaller. W. V. ANDREWS. The insect described by Dr. Kirtland as Z. dachmanii 1s probably a variety only of Z. motya of B. & L. This has been taken in Ohio, and also at Hamilton, in Ontario. It has also been received by us from W.H. Edwards, Esq., of West. Virginia. —Eb. C. E. ADVERTISEMENT. "Trintry CoLLeGE ScHooL, Port Hope, Ont.— Visitor ~—The Lord Bishop of Toronto ; Head Master :—The Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, M.A. The course of instruction includes all the usual branches of a sound education in Classics, Mathematics, English, German, French, Natural Science, Book-keeping, Drawing and Vocal Music. Fres:—Board and Tuition, $220 per annum. Michaelmas Term will commence on Zhursday, Sept. 79th. For further information apply to the Head Master. ZI Oe Canadien Entomolodict. VOL. IV. LONDON, ONT., OCTOBER, 1872. No. 10 THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION. The ¢wentyirst meeting of the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science was held at Dubuque, Iowa, in the month of August last, commenc:ng on the 21st and closing on the 27th inst. As regards the attendance and number of papers read, the meeting was certainly quite up to the average, but in scientific interest and value we cannot think it comparable to many in previous years. This deficiency was owing very largely, no doubt, to the change of locality almost at the last moment, viz., from San Francisco to Dubuque—the shores of the Pacific to the banks of the Mississipi. Several leading scientific men in the eastern States, finding the time and expenditure necessarily required for a visit to California beyond what they could well afford, had made other arrange- ments for the employment of their summer holiday, which the late change of place gave them no opportunity of altering. Others again, notably Prof. Agassiz and his party, were absent from the country, and could not im any case have taken part in the proceedings. Hence the meeting was shorn of many of its usual attractions, and has failed, we think, to leave any very decided mark upon the scientific annals of the country. While the meeting was thus defective in one point of view, it certainly Was a great success in another. Sociad/y, it left nothing to be desired. The kindness and hospitality of the good people. of Dubuque was so universal and unvaried, that all must have thoroughly enjoyed their visit, even though it was not especially distinguished by gorgeous receptions and gay fashionable entertainments, such as have sometimes rather inter- rupted the proper proceedings of the Association in cities of greater size and wealth. We do not propose to give a detailed history of the meeting, or a particular account of the papers read ; the former can be obtained by those desiring it in the current issues of many leading newspapers, especially those of Dubuque, Chicago, and New York; and the. latter will no doubt be furnished;-as usual, in the pages of the excellent American Naturalist, as well as in the Annual Transactions of the Asso- ciation. We shall merely regard the meeting from an Entomological _ point of view—the most interesting, probably, to the majority of our 182 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. readers. Before proceeding to do so, however, we must not omit to draw special attention to what was really the grand feature of the meeting—the retiring President, Professor Gray’s, able and most interesting address, and to recommend its perusal to all our readers. The only entomological paper read in Section B, “ Natural History,” was a very interesting one by Mr. C. V. Riley, on “ The Fertilization. of the Yucca Plant by Pronuba Yuccasella ;”? it was listened to with marked eattention, and was followed by an animated discussion, in which Prof. — Gray, Mr. Morse and others took part. It will, we believe, be published very shortly by the author, but meanwhile we may give a base outline of its leading features. It appears that the American Yuccas possess flowers so peculiarly constructed, that it is impossible for the pollen to reach the stigma, and consequently they depend upon artificial means for their fertilization. Mr. Riley has discovered that the “marriage priest” is a small white moth, hitherto unknown to science, which he has named Pronuba Yuccaseila, and considers thé type of a new genus. The most remarkable feature in the insect is that the female (not the male) has the basal joint of the maxillary palpus developed in a most extraordinary manner into a long curved tentacle furnished with spines. With this process the insect collects the pollen and conveys it to the tube of the stigma, which it could not otherwise reach; she then lays her eggs, the larvee from which feed upon the seeds of the Yucca fruit. The larva escapes to the ground when full grown, and passes the winter there in a silken cocoon. Mr, Riley remarked that in the more northern portions of America, where the Yucca had been introduced for the sake of its ornamental flowers, it never bore seed on account of the absence of this insect ; by the introduction of this moth, however, the defect might with- out difficulty be remedied. A matter of much interest to the entomologists present, and ads will probably prove of importance hereafter, was the formation of an Entomological Sub-section. On Saturday, the 24th of August, during the general meeting of the Association, a notice was read requesting those interested in this department of Natural History to meet together at the close of the morning session for the purpose of consulting together respecting the organization of a Sub-section. At the time appointed, the following members were present: Rev. Dr. Morris, of Baltimore, Md. ; Mr. C. V. Riley, St. Louis, Mo.; Dr. G. M. Levette, Indianapolis; Mr. O. S. Westcott, Chicago; Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Port Hope, Ont.; Mr. W. Saunders, London, Ont., and Miss M. B. Norton, Rockford, Ill. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. | 185 “7 2 . ° . Pe Dr. Morris was unanimously elected Chairman, and Mr. Saunders A Secretary. It was then moved by Mr. Bethune, and resolved, that ‘“‘if it be found necessary, the Chairman and Secretary be requested to communi- cate with the Standing Committee of the Association, with a view to the organization of an Entomological Sub-section.” ‘The following gentlemen _ were appointed members of the provisional Committee of the Sub-section: Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Messrs. C. V. Riley, and O. S. Westcott. The meeting then adjourned till 7 o’clock p.m. At the evening meeting there were present, in addition to those men- tioned above, Messrs. H. H. Babcock, Chicago; M.S. Bebb, Fairmont, Ul.; J. H. Blodgett, Rockford, Ill.; H. C. Warner, Claremont, Iowa, and C. M. Weatherby, Dubuque, Iowa. ' The Chairman having announced that it would be necessary to obtain the consent of the Standing Committee before a Sub-section could be legally organized, it was resolved that the Secretary be requested to inform the Permanent Secretary of the Association that it is deemed desirable by the entomological members that a Sub-section of Entomology should be formed in Section B.- It was then moved by Mr. Riley, and resolved, that a committee be appointed to draft a set of rules for adoption at the next meeting of the Association on the subject of entomological nomenclature. The Chair- man nominated the following committee :—Messrs. Riley, Bethune, Packard (Salem), Saunders and Morris. The meeting then proceeded to discuss the ‘ Revision of American Butterflies” recently put forth by Mr. S. H. Scudder, in advance of his forthcoming work on the Butterflies of North America. There was a unanimous expression of regret and disapprobation on the part of those _ present at the wholesale’and radical changes proposed by this distin- - guished. author in the generic and specific names of the butterflies of this Continent. The feeling was manifested by all, that changes so radical and so sweeping in the received nomenclature were uncalled for, and would prove of great detriment to the study and popularity of this depart-. ment of entomology. The hope was strongly expressed by all, that Mr. Scudder would reconsider his proposed changes before the publication of a his great work, which is looked forward to with so much interest by all - _ lepidopterists, and not mar to,a great extent its usefulness, or injure its Re general acceptance. e The meeting then adjourned. At the general meeting of the Associ- -, ation on the following Monday, a recommendation was. brought forward ~ OF ae 4 184 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. by the Standing Committee to the effect that the formation of a Sub- section of Entomology in Section B be authorised by the Association, and the necessary amendment to the Constitution be brought up for adoption at the next annual meeting. This recommendation was unanimously - adopted by the meeting, and will no doubt be ratified next year; we may, ~ therefore, look upon the “‘Sub-section of Entomology” as an accomplished fact. We trust that our readers will now do what in them lies to make it a useful and attractive portion of the Association, and not allow so good a vantage ground to be lost by apathy and indifference. We would venture to suggest to the Committee that they should, at an early date, announce some special department of entomology to be taken up by the ~ meeting next year, in addition to any subjects that may be brought into discussion by the papers of individual members. Such a plan, though not perhaps quite in accordance with precedent, would, we think, add value and attractiveness to the meeting, and possibly bring together more of our “brethren of the net” than usually attend on such occasions. The proceedings of Monday brought the actual work of the meeting pretty well to.a close; few of the members, however, returned to their homes without first going upon one or more of the interesting excursions that were made to various localities in the neighbourhood. These, we feel sure, were heartily enjoyed by all who took part in them, even though some—like the writer—may not be able to avoid occasional painful reminiscences of a crawl through a lead-mine, or a night among the Sioux City mosquitoes. : The next meeting is to be held on the shores of the Atlantic at Port- Jand, Maine, and will, we trust, prove as agreeable a reunion as the one lately brought to a close on the far away banks of the Mississippi. ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOME GENERA OF CANADIAN INSECTS. BY FRANCIS WALKER, F.L.S., LONDON, ENGLAND. The study of the geographical distribution of Insects acquires addi- ‘tional interest by its connection with astronomical calculations, and with geological researches. From them it is understood that the earth was once covered with snow and ice from the poles to the tropics, and that the like event may recur in the future, and restore the hemispheres THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 185 —— generally to the freshness and newness which they possessed at the close of the glacial period. The beginning of the cessation of this period corresponds with the origin of the present distribution of insect life, or with the commencement of the ascent of the individuals from the tropics towards the poles. This is represented on a small scale every year in the change from winter to summer, and the two periods of time agree with two aspects of the earth, the transition from the tropics towards the poles, and the upward extent of an alp, the latter being more or less an epitome of the former. It may be said by those who do not believe in the migration and settlement of insects, that the species were created in the districts which they now occupy. In this case it would appear that their creation was successive, and that they came into existence more northward and southward in proportion as the glacial climate receded. But, as each district became fitted for the maintenance of insect life, the inhabitants of the neighbouring district would be ready to occupy the vacant ground, and it is well known that the same species of insect often occurs in two or more widely separated regions. One species inhabits Europe and Chili, and may have migrated from the tropics northward and southward as the climate changed. There are indications that the tropic land was formerly much larger in extent than it is now, and would have afforded space for the multitude of insects which now inhabit the com- paratively narrow temperate regions. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 199 genera so widely separated ; and it would appear that Dr. Packard, usually so correct in his statements, has, in this instance, allowed himself to fall ¢ into error. . I am indebted to Mr. IT. L. Mead, of New York, for determining the identity of this larva with that described in Packard’s Guide.—G. M. Dopce, Ohio, IIl. TENT CATERPILLARS.—Apropos of the scarcity of the Tent Cater- pillars this season: About ten days ago, an acquaintance informed me that the fences and sidewalks near the residence of Horace Yeomans,Esq., on Bridge Street, West Belleville, were covered by an immense swarm of Caterpillars. As I could not well go thither at that time, I sent one of my boys, who soon brought me about twenty specimens of the Forest Tent Caterpillar ( C/isiocampa Sylvatica. ) . At my earliest convenience, some three days after, I visited the spot, and found some of them still clinging to the fence. At the same time, I saw a remarkable example of their destructive powers. Near the N.E. corner of Mr. Yeoman’s grounds stands a remarkably well-grown, full-branched Oak tree, about two feet diameter at four feet from the ground, and rising to a height of some sixty feet ; while its branches, extending full fifteen feet from the main stem, overspread a space of over seventy square yards. In the spring and early summer, it as usual pre- sented to the eye a dense mass of luxuriant foliage—to-day it does not- boast a single leaf; they are all eaten off to the midribs, which still adhere to the footstalks, and give the tree a most extraordinary appearance. It is evident that the migration of these caterpillars was occasioned by the exhaustion of their commissariat, which obliged them to seek “fresh fields and pastures new.” . There must have been several broods to effect such an enormous defoliation, and indeed I found specimens of all sizes, from two inches down to half an inch in length. Another Oak outside of Mr. Yeoman’s fence, near the S.E. corner of his lawn, is apparently undergoing the same process of denudation. I shall watch with interest the effect of these insect depredations on the health of the trees next season, and report the same for the ENromoLocisT.—PRor. BELL, Belleville, Ont., Aug. 19. Danais Arcurippus.—I have often seen these tawny butterflies dis- porting themselves over the waters of the Kingston Bay some hundreds of yards from shore ; still I was quite surprised to see, early in August, two specimens flying boldly some seven and eight miles out from the 200 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Scarborough coast, as if they had fully determined to cross Lake Ontario and visit their American relatives. One poor fellow, however, had come -to grief, and floated with outstretched wings upon the rippling wavelets. The time was about eight in the morning, and there was no wind to blow them out to sea.—R. V. Rocers, Kingston, Ont. DoryPHORA I0-LINEATA, the champion potato-eater, has made his way east as far‘as this city. I saw several crawling about in September. —R. V. Roctrs, Kingston, Ont. DIAPHEROMERA FEMORATA, Say, OR SPECTRUM FEMORATUM, Harris. Are the ‘‘walking sticks” unusually plentiful this year? I counted, and. could easily have captured, twenty-eight of them,within a couple of hours in a wood near the village of Vittoria, Co. of Norfolk. They were all upon the trunks of oaks ; not one was to be seen on any other kind of tree, although beech and maple were growing in close proximity to the oak. On one tree I saw seven, and was delighted thereat, as in the eastern section of Ontario, though to be found, they are yet far from common. It was at the end of August, and the process of copulation was still going on, yet I caught two little creatures of a light green colour, and the third of an inch long, which I took to be young “‘sticks.” Pack- ard says that in this genus “the antenne are rather short ;’ my exper- ience is that in this species they are over two inches long. Both Harris and Packard accuse the Spectre of being very sluggish and inactive; I found that on the slightest touch—even when in the act of coupling—the - insects made off, marching up the trees on their tall stilt-like legs in a manner pertectiy surprising, till quickly they were far beyond the reach of pursuit.—R. V. Rocers, Kingston, Ont. PERSONAL. Dr. A. S. PACKARD, JR., has just returned from a four months’ visit to the entomological collections of Europe, where he compared many of our foreign-named species of Lepidoptera to the types. Dr. Joun L. LECONTE is expected home from his long stay in Europe this month of October, and will then commence the classification of the North American Curculionidae. an event that all entomologists will re- joice in. Dr. Gro. H. Horn is preparing a synopsis of the genus Zcbia of the family Carabide. Che Canadian Entomologist. VOL. IV. LONDON, ONT., NOVEMBER, 1872. No. 11 REMARKS ON LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED AT FOX BAY, ANTICOSTI, AND THE NORTH SHORE OF THE ST. LAWRENCE, BETWEEN JUNE 18tH AND AUGUSTI rst. BY WILLIAM COUPER, MONTREAL. When I decided on an Entomological tour during the past summer to the Island of Anticosti and the coast of Labrador, I fully expected to bring home sufficient material, not only to satisfy the few subcribers to the enterprise, but (after supplying them) enough to remunerate myself for the risk of the voyage and loss of time. Your readers are already acquainted with my misfortune ; still, I hope that the lost species will be replaced, as it is my intention to go over the ground again (if God spares me) next summer. Entomologically speaking, the region is totally new. A great deal of knowledge can yet be obtained from another research in these regions, as the following brief remarks sufficiently show. For years past I wished for an opportunity to explore the Island of Anticosti,in order to collect its insect fawza and obtain a knowledge of the species occur- ring thereon. Before I visited it, I had an idea that it would be found deficient in many of the Coleopterous forms which exist on the shores of the St. Lawrence, to the north and south of it. So far, therefore, my surmises are correct, as I found it meagre, indeed, in Geodephaga. No Cicindelidae occurred in my rambles, and but two or three species of Carabidae were met with during the time I remained there. The species obtained belonging to the latter were evidently brought there by com- merce. The island is evidently rich in Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera, and probably Longicornia and Curculionidae. No doubt its fresh water ponds, when carefully examined, will be found to contain nondescript species of aquatic Coleoptera. The few species belonging to the latter order and Hymenoptera, collected on the Island, also those occasionally picked up on the Labrador coast, will, in due time, be described in the Can. ENT. ; There is nearly one hundred miles between the West point of Anticosti to Fox Bay, near the East, and where I collected. Heretofore, 202 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. it was almost inacessible to the Naturalist, who could only visit it to undergo much privation and hardship. Its forest is dense, and in many places almost impenetrable, but a great portion of the flora. resembles that found in the mountain region north of the city of Quebec, and I have no doubt that the bulk of the Lepidoptera to be met with on, the West Point will be found similar to those occurring in high northern latitudes. Mr. Strecker says that “the moths, with a few exceptions, are the same as some I took in the mountains of Luzerne Co., Penn. In fact, when I opened your box, I was struck with the similarity of its contents to a box I brought home from that trip—thirteen species of moths like thirteen species out of the twenty-two you sent me. Is not this curious? But, after all, if we consider that Luzerne County is the most mountainous part of this State, almost impenetrable and wild, and fire feels comfortable there in June, it is not such great matter for wonder.” PAPILIO POLYXENES Fadbr., var. BREVICAUDA, Saunders.—I took four specimens of this species on the Island. It appears to be raré at Fox Bay. The specimen sent to Mr. H. K. Morrison, Boston, corresponds with the description of érevicauda. Regarding the ~ and Q which I sent as P. asterias to Mr. Herman Strecker, of Reading, Pa., he writes that the 2 of asterias has not got the yellow macular band on the wings as the & has, or, at least, it is only represented by a few small spots, whereas the 2 from Anticosti has the yellow band of unusual size, even broader than on the f which accompanied the latter,and that the Anticost! g has the band twice as broad as any specimen seen by him from the United States, Canada, or Central America. He adds, that it comes as near to the South American P. Sadu/us as it does to astertas. Iam, therefore, inclined to believe that there are two Northern black and yellow varieties of Papilio, viz.:—one of asterias, occurring along the north shore and coast of Labrador to Newfoundland, while P. folyxenes Fabr., var. drevicauda, is so far confined to the Island of Anticosti. PIERIS FRIGIDA Scudder.—This species was quite common in Labrador during my visit in 1867, and I met with it on the 2oth of last June, at Fox Bay, Anticosti, where it was not abundant. In October of the above year,a Q frigida was forwarded to Mr. Scudder, who thought it was the above species, but as I did not send the #, he was not positive. It would be well, therefore, to compare it with congeneric species. CoLIAS INTERIOR, Scudder.—This butterfly occurs on the north coast of Labrador, from Sawbill River to Natashquan. It is not frequently seen THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 203 — near the sea; but generally met with in the woodland and mountain regions in the interior. The specimens collected were destroyed, and the only one brought home was sent to Mr. Strecker, who writes as follows :— “T have strong doubt about the genuineness of this species. I compared the female you sent me with five ‘females of Pe/idne (from above Rupert’s House, B. A., and Labrador), and the only difference I can detect is the color of the upper surface of the wings. ‘The one you sent me is yellow, while my examples of Pe/idne are white, which is no distinction at all in the Co/iades, as most of them are blessed with two kinds of females, one the color of the *male, and the other albino.” ARGYNNIS CHARICLEA £sf.—One of the earliest and most common butterflies in Labrador. In my opinion, distinct from Botsduvalii, which appears at least a month later in the north. I took fresh specimens of the latter at Mingan, six years ago, on the 22nd of July, when chaviclea had terminated its season. Mr. Morrison pronounces the above as a variety of Boisduvaiii, stating that he possesses specimens from the Alps. ARGYNNIS ATLANTIS Zdws.—When on my way home, about the end of July, I took a specimen of the above at Sawbill River. It agrees in every particular with specimens taken by my friend, Mr. Strecker, in Luzerne County, Pa. He states that the Pennsylvania specimens ‘are darker and more reddish than those in his collection from Lake Superior. PHYCORIDES THAROS Cram.—I took a few specimens of this butterfly at Sawbill River, Labrador, which I regarded as a Meéditaea, but, being in doubt regarding the species, I sent an equal share to those who were entitled tothem. Mr. Morrison named it as above, stating that it occurs from Labrador to Texas, and the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountains. The *Thive notic-d this curious connection with Pieris Rapw, which have extremely yellow males, occurring here in the fall. Onmy return from the North, I captur d near this city, last September, a yellow mle in coitu with a white female. I sent the former to Mr. Morrison, of Buston, who states thatis is “ the var. Novanglia Scudd., and that it is not uncommon in the spring aroun Boston.” Iam of opinion that white and sul- phur yell w varieties of rapae may be found constantly wherever t’ ey occur.. The food plants of rapae are cabbare, mignonette, nasturtium. and various cruciferae, therefore it may be that the American specimens exhibited by Mr. Scudder in Europe, were what the late Mr. Walsh termed phytophagic. 'Tvereisno doubt, in my mind, that the food of - caterpill rs produces the varieties which lead to somne con‘usi nin the determination of butterflies. My friend, Mr. F. B. Caulfield, of this city, informs me that he has reared caterpillars of rapae, found on mignonette, which produced imagoes of a deep sulphur yellow. 204 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. specimens sent to Mr. Strecker were identified by him as Me/itea Batesii, Reakirt, described in Pro. Ent. Soc. of Phil., 1865. VANESSA (GRAPTA) PROGNE Cram.—A single specimen taken at Fox Bay, Anticosti, on the 2oth June. Similar to the same species taken at Quebec. VANESSA ANTIOPA Linn.—One specimen captured at Fox Bay, Anti- costi, on the 19th July. PyRAMEIS CARDUI Zinn.—This species occurs early on Anticosti. On my arrival at Fox Bay, they were worn and unfit for collection. PyRAMEIS ATALANTA.—Fox ate rare in June. CHIONOBA abrador, in July, I took one specimen of a species a Helene to fae above genus, which I sent to my esteemed friend, Mr. Strecker, who writes as follows :—‘“ I have compared it with Ch. Semidea, Crambis, jutta, Balder, also, Uhlerit, Taygete (Bootes), the only ones in my collection that could possibly have any affinity with it, but am afraid to pronounce it the same as any one of them. It isnearer to ju/fa than to any other, but I won’t say it is it. After it is expanded, I will give it another examination.” Probably this is another instance in which we see the external change produced on the imago through the food plant of the caterpillar, and I have no doubt but it will turn out to be a variety of jutta. Lyczna—? (NV. S.)—I collected a few specimens-of this species at Musquaro, Labrador, in July, 1867, a specimen of which was sent to Mr. Scudder, of Boston, in September following. Mr. S. wrote to me that it was, to the best of his knowledge, Z. Zygdamus Doubl., but he wished me to inform him whether the Labradorian specimens “ were all marked witha single spot on the secondaries, where his Hudson Bay specimens have two.” Not having a sufficient number to examine, the identification could not be determined at that time, but on my arrival at Fox Bay, Anticosti, it was the first butterfly that attracted my attention, and I was fortunate in obtaining twelve dozen of them. On lately referring to Mr. Scudder’s letter of Oct. rst, 1867, the remarkable difference pointed out by him was discernible in all my specimens, but, not knowing the species, I sent them to my subscribers as Z. Lygdamus. Mr. Morrison writes as follows :— “ Zycena? (N.S.)—You named this species Z. Zygdamus Doubl. I have compared your specimens very carefully with my specimens of the true Lygdamus from Northern New York, and am satisfied that it is a dis- tinct species. The color of the whole underside is different ; also, the THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 205 arrangement of the spots on the underside of secondaries slightly, but constantly. The black ocelli to the spots, very conspicuous in the true Lygdamus, are almost wanting in your species.” Mr. Strecker has also suspicion regarding it. However, I have no doubt but that this Zycena will turn out to be one of a few new species yet to be discovered on the dividing line between the Canadian and Arctic Lepidopterous faunas. Lyczna—? (JV. S.)—I sent one specimen of a species of this genus to, Mr. Morrison, who informs me that itis “closely allied to epixanthe, but I think different. Congeneric with the castro of California and the xanthe of Europe. It is nearer castro than epixanthe.” This butterfly was taken at Sawhbill River, Labrador, on 2oth of July, and, after all my mistor- tune, I was pleased that day. I trust that my talented friend, Mr. M., will shortly describe it in the Can. ENr. Lyc®na Lucia A7zréy.—Common in the woods at Fox Bay during the ‘month of June. It also occurs abundantly on the south-western coast of Labrador. Mr. Morrison appears to notice no difference between the Anticosti specimens and those taken in Western Canada, and the middle and the Eastern United States, but Mr. Strecker says that they are darker underneath than the United States specimens generally are. Lyc#NA ScupDERI.—This is one of the most permanently marked species in North America. The Entomologist may occasionally obtain an obscure specimen, but upon thorough examination, it will be found prototypic of its congeners of the valley. The specimens forwarded to my correspondents differ in no particular from United States and Canadian examples. HESPERIA PANISCUS Fabr.—A single specimen captured at Fox Bay, Anticosti, on the 26th June. It was sent to Mr. Morrison, who informs me that it does not differ in the slightest from the European specimens of paniscus. It is close to AZandax Edw. I feel convinced that the latitude of Quebec is the most northern limit of the Hesferidans. Alypia Langionti Couper. _I was astonished when I met this beautiful moth in Fox Bay, Anticosti. Mr. Strecker states that “ he found it in the mountains of Luzerne, Pa.” It is curious that since I described this insect, some years ago, it appears now in Western Canada and in high latitudes many miles south of Quebec. A. octomaculata was also taken at Fox Bay. SESIA RUFICAUDIS Airéy.--Fox Bay, Anticosti; uncommon. This species is very common at Quebec. DEILEPHILA GALLI Bott. (Gallii Schiff.)—Fox Bay, Anticosti, and Sheldrake River, Labrador ; uncommon, but abundant at Quebec. Mr. 206 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Strecker writes as follows :—“‘In spite of all American Lepidopterists in a bunch, this is the JY. Chemanerii Harris, but it is identical with the- Galli of Europe. I have compared specimens from New York, Pensyl- vania, Massachusetts, Canada, Ohio, France, Regensburg, the Hartz and — various other parts of Europe, and neither I now, nor any other living human being can detect any difference.” MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 195. ADRASTEIA. A. quercifoliella. Depressaria bicostomaculella, ante p. 127. The former description of this species was made from a single old specimen, on which no tvfts were visible (having, no doubt, been removed in setting the specimen, which was, however, otherwise undenuded.) Since the publication of that description, I have bred the species, and the tufts in the fresh specimen are distinct, and the insect unquestionably belongs. to this genus. The following description of the fresh specimen is more accurate than the preceding one. I have changed the specific name, giving it that of the food-plant. Head and. its appendages, thorax, and primaries, with a somewhat indistinct dark purplish lustre, especially on the darker portions. Second joint of the palpi blackish, with white and a few ochreous scales inter- mixed ; the third joint blackish, with but few white or ochreous scales, with the extreme tip pale ochreous. Head whitish ; face with few blackish scales intermixed ; vertex densely dusted with blackish. Antenne dark fuscous, with a faint narrow pale ochreous annulus at the base of each joint. Thorax and primaries—to the naked eye, dark iron gray with blackish irregular spots, some of them large—under the lens, blackish freely dusted with pale blue, white, and some pale ochreous scales, with large velvetty blackish spots not dusted. Ciliz yellowish white, the basal half of the dorsal cilize freely dusted with blackish. The thoracic tuft is pale yellowish, those on the wings are small and whitish; the largest is nearest the base and within the dorsal margin; the other two are just behind the middle, one before the other, and both nearer to the costal THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 207 — than to the dorsal margin ; there is a small whitish streak at the beginning of the dorsal ciliz, and an opposite costal one, and another faintly indicated costal one near the base. A/ar ex. +s inch. The larva feeds on the under side of leaves of the black oak, in a web. It is pale yellowish, with the head and first three segments dark brown, the first segment shining brown. A. querciella. LN. sp. Depressaria querciella, ante p. 127. As before mentioned, this species has the thoracic tuft; and though I cannot detect any raised tufts upon the wings, yet, as in other parts of its structure, it is identical with the above described species, as well asin the ornamentation, it belongs more properly in this genus than in Defres- saria. The statement at p. 127, that “zt zs a Depressaria in all respects, except the tuft,” is too broad. It would be more correct to say that it closely approaches Defressaria in all respects, &c. The brush on the palpi is scarcely long enough for Defressaria, the primaries are too narrow and the style of ornamentation is different. In the fresh specimens also, the abdomen is somewhat convex, as in the other insects which I have placed in this genus. In all of these insects the brush is. spreading, and sometimes appears to be distinctly divided. This species and A. guercifoliclla were bred from Oak leaves, and the two other species.were taken in Oak woods, and probably feed either upon Oak or Hickory leaves. VENILIA, gevt. nov. The insect which I make the type of this genus is related to Avarsia, Cleodora, and Ypsolophus, perhaps more nearly to the first named than to either of the others. The tuft at the end of the second joint of the palpi resembles that of Avarsza, and the neuration is nearer to that of Anarsia than to that of Ypsolophus. I am not acquainted with the neuration of CZcdora. It resembles the latter genus in the slender antennz ; but the wings are wider and the terminal joint of the palpi too long and slender. Terminal joint of the labial palpi as long as the second, slender, almost acicular. Tuft at the end of the second joint scarcely concealing the base of the third joint, and pointing downward rather than forward. Antennz very slender, indistinctly pectinated, and microscopically pubes- _ cent, scarcely reaching the apical third of the wings. Wings rather wide. Primaries ovate, lanceolate, faintly falcate beneath the tip. The costal attains the margin; the subcostal sends from before 208 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. the middle a long branch to the costal margin, and two other approximate branches from the end of the cell, from the first of which it bends down to its union with the discal vein; whence it proceeds towards the apex, before which it divides, sending one branch to the costal and one to the dorsal . margin near the apex. Discal cell wide at the end, closed, the discal vein emitting two branches to the dorsal margin; the median emits two branches before the end of the cell, from which it curves to the dorsal margin. Submiedian furcate at the base. Hind wings with the costal margin, nearly straight, a little arched towards the base ; costal vein straight, long, attaining the margin before the apex ; subcostal very faint from the base to the discal vein, distinct from thence to the apex, straight ; cell closed by a distinct discal vein which sends two branches to the dorsal margin ; median oblique, nearly straight, furcate at the end of the cell, and with a branch to the dorsal margin before the end of the cell. Hind margin regularly curved, not emarginate; narrower than the fore wings. V. albapalpella. WN. sp. Apical joint of the palpi snowy white, with a narrow brown ring at the base; second joint white at its apex and on the inner surface; grayish-brown on the outer surface. Antennae grayish-brown, annulate with white. Head, thorax and primaries grayish-brown, with a row of yellowish-ochreous spots around the apex of the wings at the base of the ciliae. Adar ex. 1s of an inch. Captured in June in Kentucky. ANARSIA. A.? pruniella, Clem. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sct., Phila, 1860, p. 169. In Mr. Stainton’s valuable collection of Dr. Clemens’ papers (for which Mr. S. is entitled to the lasting gratitude of every student of the American Zineina), page 36, Dr. Clemens uses this language: “‘ Yesterday I found the g¢ of Anarsia? pruniella. Tt ts the same as the European, and the genus is no longer doubtful.” The italics are mine. Same as the European what? I suppose Dr. C. means the European A. dineatella Zeller. My specimens were taken on Plum trees, and I recognize them easily in Dr. Clemens’ description of his specimens, which were bred from the Plum. But I have received from Mr. Townend Glover a specimen which he bred from Peach leaves, and which is identical with mine. And Mr. C. V. Riley informs me that specimens which he bred from Peach leaves, and sent to Prof. Zeller, were recognized by Zeller as his species. ‘There can be no reasonable doubt that the species is the same as Zeller’s, and that his name has priority. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 209 BEGOE, gev. Ov. The insect described below as the type of this genus I have been unable to place in any genus known to me. I do not deem it necessary to give any further diagnosis of the genus than to say that it 1s an Ypsolophus, except as to the antenne and palpi. The former are minutely pectinated, and are otherwise like those of Ysolophus. ‘The terminal joint of the palpi is, perhaps, a little more robust than in Ypsolophus; the second joint is clavate, rounded at the apex, laterally compressed, vertically thickest just before the end, forming a thick, rather compact, undivided brush. As to the length of the palpiand the relative lengths of the joints, it agrees with Ypsolophus. B. costolutela. WN. sp. Tongue and face brownish-ochreous ; palpi ochreous yellow; head brown on top, ochreous yellow above the eyes; thorax dark shining brown, except the anterior margin and patagiz, which are ochreous yellow. A line drawn from the base of the anterior wings, near the dorsal margin, to the beginning of the costal cilize, will divide the wing into a narrower anterior (or costal) ochreous yellow portion, and a wider posterior (or dorsal) portion, which is shining dark brown. The anterior or ochreous yellow portion, however, becomes furcate about the apical third of the wing, sending a curved branch into the dark brown portion ; this branch is at first wide, but curved, gradually narrowing towards the dorsal cilise, which it does not quite reach. There is a faint, narrow, ochreous yellow hinder marginal line at the base of the cilia, which are paler than the dark portion of the wing, their basal half being darker than the apical half. Posterior wings and their ciliz grayish slate color. A/ar ex.t¢in. Kentucky. If one could believe that the projecting brushes had been removed sa evenly and smoothly as in this insect, without otherwise injuring them, and leaving no trace that they had ever been other than they now are, then this insect would be an Yfsolophus, resembling Y. eupatoriella (vid. post-prox ). NOTES ON SOME GENERA OF CANADIAN INSECTS. BY FRANCIS WALKER, F. L. S., LONDON, ENGLAND. The geographical distribution of Smcra differs much from that of _ Leucospis. Unlike the latter genus, which is spread thinly and somewhat 210 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. equally over the warm and temperate regions of the earth, Smzcra, with. very few exceptions, is limited to the New World, where there are some species in North America, many in Mexico and in the West Indies, and great abundance in the tropical parts of South America, and the genus has thus much more influence than Zewcosfis in regulating, by means of transfer, the increase of other insect tribes. Its body is omamented with very various patterns of black on a yellow or red ground hue, except a few species, which are mostly or entirely black. The family Chatadide, to which it belongs, is even more free than the Leucospidae from metallic lustre, the only exception being the isolated genus, WVofaspis, a native of St. Vincent’s Isle, in the West Indies. The very few species in Asia and Africa hardly possess the typical form, but the three or four European species are as characteristic of the genus as those of America. The American species from Georgia, which I have mentioned as a variety of the European S. #igrifex, may be considered as a distinct species. It was not known to Cresson, who has described many new species of the genus, but will probably be soon distinguished and named in America. It isa little smaller than S. nigrifex; the forewings are a little narrower; the petiole is a little longer; the hind coxe area little shorter: the hind femora are not black at the tips, and have beneath smaller and more numerous teeth ; the tibiz are piceous, red at the base, not wholly black, as are those of S. nigrifex. The only Canadian species is S. Canadensis. ANNUAL ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, 1872. To the Members of the Entomological Society of Ontario: GENTLEMEN,—It is my happy privilege once again to congratulate you upon the completion of another year of progress in the annals of our Society. As you have already learnt from the very satisfactory Report of our excellent Secretary-Treasurer, the list of members of the Society has been largely added to during the past twelve months; the Library has been increased by the purchase of a number of -valuable Entomological works ; a cabinet and microscope have been bequeathed to us by our late lamented member, the Rev. Professor Hubbert, and our collections have been much improved ; a comfortable and commodious suite of rooms has been procured in a central locality in London, Ont.,—the present head- Ts. y THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. AEs quarters of the Society ; the CaNapran Enromo tocist has been regularly issued with, we trust, no diminution in the value and interesting character of its contents; our Second Annual Report on Noxious and Beneficial Insects, prepared by Messrs. Saunders and Reed, and myself, and containing notices of the insects affecting the Apple, Grape, Plum, Currant and Gooseberry, Wheat crops, Potato, Cabbage, Cucumber, Melon, Pumpkin and Squash, has been duly published by the Legislature of Ontario, and no doubt has long since been in the hands of you all- Such, gentlemen, is our record for the year that is now brought toa close, and, having in addition, a satisfactory balance-sheet from the Treasurer, we feel that mutual congratulations are not out of place, and that we who have been honoured with official positions in the Society, can look back ‘upon our efforts in its behalf with at least the agreeable feeling that they have not been altogether in vain. If we turn, moreover, from our own especial interests to the condition and prospects of American Entomology in general, we find much to afford us satisfaction and encouragement. No large work, indeed, on any particular order of insects has appeared during the past year, but many valuable reports of State Entomologists and portions of serial publications have been issued from the press,—among the latter, I may be pardoned, I am sure, for especially drawing attention to the exquisite illustrations of North American Butterflies contained in Mr. W. H. Edwards’ invaluable work, which has now reached its Tenth Part. It speaks well, too, for the growing popularity of this branch of Natural Science, that Dr. Packard’s useful “Guide to the Study of Insects” has already reached a ¢hird edition. A pleasing recognition of American Entomological work has _ recently, I may add, been manifested in England by the publication there» in a collected form, of the writings of the late Dr. Brackenridge Clemens, on the Zinciva of North America, under the editorial supervision of Mr. H. T. Stainton, the well-known authority in that department of Lepidop- terology. Apart, however, from the position attained by the growth of our Entomological literature, the Science has this year received a recognition that cannot fail to be of great and permanent benefit to it. I allude to the formation of a special sub-section of Entomology at the recent meeting of the American Association for the advancement of Science. It will now be practicable for American Entomologists—to whatever part of the Continent they may belong, whether to a Province of the Dominion 212 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. or a State of the Union, from the Atlantic to the Pacific—to meet together for mutual conference on matters Entomological. Questions affecting the Science in general can hardly fail to arise from time to time, and demand the consideration, and, possibly, the decision of some such united council. Certainly, the proceedings of such a gathering will be of great interest and value to all who take part in them, if not, indeed, to the whole circle of Canadian and American Entomologists. ‘At the informal meeting at Dubuque, in August last, one subject was specially brought forward for discussion,which I cannot forbear alluding to more particularly here, especially as it may justly be considered the great question of the day in the Entomological world. I refer to the subject of — the Specific and Generic Nomenclature of Insects. For some few years past indications have not been wanting of a growing inclination amongst the mass of Entomologists to resist the efforts made by some few able and distinguished writers to impose, year after year, new sets of names upon our common insects. This has been done partly by the revival of the jong-forgotten names published at the close of the last century, or the beginning of the present one ; and partly by the perpetual formation of new genera, and the re-distribution of species. The ability of the writers and the good work they have done in other respects, have caused these annoying changes to be acquiesced in for the most part, even though the object in view appeared to be rather the exhibition of their powers of research among antiquated tomes, or the supposed immortalization of themselves by the attachment of their own names to those of our familiar insects. I do not say that these men were actuated entirely by such motives, but assuredly one can hardly be accused of ill-natured criticism in ascribing much of the work to such causes.. All must admit, I think, » that nomenclature is but a means to an end, and that end is surely best attained by the preservation of all names that. have been in universal acceptation for a period of years, and that cannot be set aside without disturbing the cabinets of every Entomologist in the land. Matters in this respect have been brought to a climax by the recent - publication of Mr. Scudder’s ‘‘ Systematic Revision of some of the North American Butterflies.” I esteem Mr. Scudder so highly as a friend, and value so greatly the good scientific work that he has done, that it pains me exceedingly to say a single word against anything that he may put forth. His projected “ revision,” however, is so sweeping and so revolutionary that I cannot forbear to make some remarks upon it. I know that his scientific labours are perfectly unselfish, and that he is entirely destitute of THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 213 any of the conceit that I have just now referred to; I feel sure, too, that he is actuated only by the desire to benefit the science; yet I do deeply deplore the mode that he has adopted, and am convinced that if his views are pressed, a very great obstacle will be thrown in the way of the advancement and popularization of this department of Natural History. Weall, I am sure, look forward with eager anticipation to the publication of his great work upon North American Butterflies, and have no doubt that it will be the most complete, the most scientific, and the most conscientious work of the kind in America, but assuredly its value wili be very greatly marred and its general acceptance impaired, if he continues to insist upon all these radical changes. -To show you what these changes are, I will briefly state that in the pamphlet already published, and which is intended as a forerunner of the author’s great work on the Butterflies, the following alterations are made in the received noménclature:—The 228 species enumerated are distributed among 96 genera—almost a genus for every two species; of these 96 genera, 42 are entirely new, and 39 others are obsolete names of Hubner and others that have never been generally adopted ; there are thus 15 familiar generic names left, but of these several are transferred from their present position to entirely different groups of species ; for instance, the name of Pafz/io is removed from the genus of ‘Swallow-tailed Butter- flies, and handed over to the sole use of the insect at present known as Vanessa antiopa! Further, among the 96 genera there are no less than 45 that include but a single species apiece; and among the 228 species there are only 16 left with their present names unchanged! ‘These figures are surely quite enough to show that I have not misapplied the terms ‘sweeping, ‘revolutionary, and ‘radical, as characterizing this work of revision. I would, then, most earnestly entreat Mr. Scudder, for the sake of the science itself, to re-consider his projected changes,—to discard all antiquated names in favor of those that have been for years in general acceptation, and to reduce his list of new genera to as small a number as he conscientiously can. If he does not, if he persists in his revision, I fear that his great work—most valuable as it will undoubtedly be in all other respects—will introduce more confusion, trouble and discord into American Entomology than a generation can get rid of. If these difficulties can be avoided in no other mode, it will remain for us all to unite together and agree to ignore all old forgotten names that may be brought forward, and retain all remaining of familiar species, until a general settlement of the question can be satisfactorily arrived at. 214 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. I fear, gentlemen, that I have now completely exhausted your patience ; I shall therefore hasten to a close. But before doing so, let me remind you that, since our last annual meeting, our Society has lost by death one of its most valued members, Mr. B. Billings, of Ottawa, Ont. He was one of those devoted lovers of science who do good service by their honest, hearty work, but who, from their innate modesty and retiring disposition, shrink from all publicity. At times he contributed valuable papers to our little periodical, but he could never be induced to make any display of the knowledge he had acquired by his patient dilligence both at home and in the field. Permit me now, gentlemen, to resign into your hands the office that you have done me the honor of investing me with. I thank you for your kindness and courtesy towards myself and my colleagues, and with every wish for the continued success and prosperity of your Society, I have the honour to be, gentlemen, Your obedient servant, CHARLES J. 5. BETHUNE. Trinity College School, Port Hope, September, 1872. ON MR. SCUDDER’S SYSTEMATIC REVISION OF SOME (OF THE AMERICAN: BUTTERFLIES. BY AUG. R. GROTE, We have here before us a paper by an accomplished scholar, on a subject dear to us from our own studies. Mr. Scudder’s Revision presents two main points for our consideration. ‘The first point affects the sequence of the Butterflies in a systematic arrangement ; the second the application of the scientific law of priority. As to the first, the considerations which have influenced Mr. Scudder to side rather with Ochsenheimer than with Boisduval, where the present Revision is not original, are evidently not lightly taken. Mr. Scudder’s strong perceptions must contrast agreeably with the superficiality of those writers who find an excuse for the most heterogeneous linear ‘arrangements on the plea that resemblances are diverse (nefsartige verwandschaft,) who stay not to discriminate between degrees of similarity. On this first point one shall criticize Mr. Scudder, who has a large comprehension of the subject, and whose argument shall ignore 'trivialities. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 215 On the second point, and one which is minor in theory, but in practice more important, we have to say : Mr. Scudder restores obsolete terms for sub-divisions higher than genera, and disregards the family and sub-family terminations lately rendered common in Zoology, chiefly by English writers on insects. On occasion, we think the propriety of this restoration doubtful, and that the law of priority does not come into question. Where the older author meant by his names what Mr. Scudder now declares, the older name should stand without doubt. And here we owe Mr. Scudder a debt of gratitude for his bibliognostic information. But, if such values are recognized, is it not better to give the usual terminations in de, ine, and ini to the terms for families, sub-families and tribes. Two families in the Latreillean sense (Papilionide and Hes- periide, ) are represented by the insects Mr. Scudder discusses, and, while we cannot doubt that they contain natural assemblages of genera of sub- family and tribal value, we are unprepared to support this view against Mr. Scudder’s divisions, which are not explained by diagnosis. And while we cannot contest the value of the most of Mr. Scudder’s genera, we may more often differ as to the application of the law of priority in the choice of generic names. ‘The value of Hubner’s' Verzeichnis (1816,) and its use by Mr. Scudder, is a case in point. Notwithstanding Ochsenheimer’s repudiation, Guenee’s sneers, and Lederer’s contemptuous patronage, Hubner’s genera are now in great part becoming recognized, and his names available to science. This quiet, unobtrusive man has written what has endured half a century of abuse and intolerance, to be found greatly true. We have elsewhere (Cuban Zygaenide ) written what we thought of ’ Hubner and his generic conceptions. Let us see now how Mr. Scudder uses him sometimes. On page 59 Mr. Scudder adopts Zerene for a genus of which Papilio caesonia is type, and says: ‘‘Since the typical species of Zerene of Hubner fall into the much older genus, Co/éas, the name may be retained for the last species, Pap. caesonia of Stoll. That this ought to be preferred to Meganostoma of Reakirt follows from my suggestion in 1862, that the former should be retained for the two species here cata logued.” But Hubner’s Zrene is synonymous with Co/ias ; no subsequent “suggestion in 1862” can alter Hubner’s meaning in 1816. Hubner does not autoptically know all the species he cites ; hence we must always take with him the first species as his types. If to Zerene we cite Scudder (1862,) the name is logical and, in this case, must be discarded at once so as not to interfere with the priority of a well established genus of Geometride, of the same name. AMeganostoma must be retained. 216 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. If we apply similar considerations to several others of Mr. Scudder’s genera, we shall remove in great part what is objectionable, and dzzarre (e. g., the use of Papilio for Van. antiopa,) remembering that the older - authors always cited, as a matter of duty, all previously published names, even without note of identification, and that therefore they are not to be held liable for a// the contents of their genera. Without questioning any of Mr. Scudder’s statements on page 37, with regard to the use of the name Papiliv, we yet know that Linnaeus applied it to his Agzwztes first. Schrank’s wide ‘‘limitation” can, then, have no priority in reason, nor the new-restriction by Mr. Scudder against a well established use for a genus of which Papilio machaon is the conceded type. Let us disintegrate Papilio quickly ; it must sorely need it that such means should be pre- scribed for the end. We may differ with Mr. Scudder occasionally on matters of synonomy . (¢. g., Thecla calanus and inorata,) but we follow him admiringly in his conscientious generic definitions, and are ever ready to sink the critic in the disciple. DESCRIPTION OF A REMARKABLE VARIETY OF LIMENITIS MISIPPUS. BY THEODORE L. MEAD, NEW YORK. While in the Catskill Mountains this summer, I met with a very curious variety of Z. Misippus in which the conspicuous ‘black stripe crossing the secondaries was altogether absent, and the corresponding mark on the primaries only indicated by a dusky cloud extending to the median ner- vule and enclosing no white spots. .On the underside the differences remain the same. In the ordinary type, there is a whitish cloud around the cross stripe. In the variety under consideration this is quite distinct. The marginal row of greenish lunules is obsolete, but the submarginal white ones are enlarged so as to leave no black between the lunules and the buff ground-color on the secondaries, and but little on the primaries. On the upper surface, these lunules are rather large on the fore wings, but otherwise as in the usual type. The specimen was a female. It is noticeable that this variety is a nearer approach, in general appearance, to D. Archippus, which, as is well known; enjoys almost entire immunity from ordinary foes. We may fairly assume that had not the Entomological collector intervened as an unexpected factor in the problem sI THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 21 of the “Struggle for Existence,” our present variety, protected above its fellows by a closer resemblance to the distasteful Danais, might have given rise to a new species, and that, in less time than is generally assumed to be necessary for specific changes ; as this variety would be thought to present quite sufficient specific differences, were it brought from a distant region. In examining a number of butterflies offered for sale to the American Museum of Natural History, I found a curious variety of Limenitis ursula. Above, the markings are the same, but with the substitution of fulvous | for blue, except in the marginal lunules, which are white with a faint bluish tinge. Below, the suffusion is very conspicuous and the secondaries in color and marking considerably resemble those of MJisippus. It is not impossible that the specimen may be a hybrid between these two, as J have seen offspring resulting from the union of such dissimilar species, as Smerinthus Tilie and Populi of Europe, showing the characteristics of both. Should the wrsu/a be merely a variety, it would furnish an excellent illustration of the way in which Afisifpus probably originated. A NEW HESPERIAN. BY G. M. DODGE. Hesperia [linois. N. sp. Male expands 1.3 inches. All the wings dark brown above. ‘The primaries throughout the middle and basal areas sparingly sprinkled with fulvous scales. This color is deepest around the stigma, which consists of a velvetty black bar extending obliquely from near the middle of the submedian vein to the cell, and is often divided into two equal parts by the fourth median veinlet. A large square patch, not sprinkled with fulvous, occurs in the middle area at the termination of the cell; anda smal] detached yellow spot lies immediately below, and outward from the anterior termination of the stigma. The base and middle of the secondaries are covered with long yellowish hairs. Fringe on all the wings €: Underside fulvous, inclining to ferruginous ; the internal half of the primaries smoky, shading into black at the base and inner margin ; two small yellowish spots near the centre (very distinct in some specimens, in others nearly obsolete) seem reproduced from above. That nearest the apex is round, the other is larger and somewhat reniform. On the 218 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. secondaries the fold is smoky ; a broad band of fulvous precedes it, extending from the base to the outer margin; on the remainder of the wing the color is paler, and all the veins white and conspicuous. _ Fringe of all the wings brown, becoming white at the internal angles. Above, head and thorax fulvous; abdomen black; its sides partly clothed with whitish-yellow hairs ; palpi fulvous, tipped with black. Below, abdomen and palpi white; breast mouse-coloured. Antenne annulated ; above, brown ;- below, whitish-yellow ; underside of club red. The female expands 1.5 inches and is like the male, with the following exceptions : The stigma is wanting, and the fulvous on the primaries above is very obscure, being most apparent along the costa. Two small, semi- transparent yellow spots occur near the middle of the primaries; the one nearest the apex being so small as to be indistinct; the other is a little larger. Variety 4, 2. Same as above, but the two spots in the centre of the primaries are much larger ; the upper is triangular, the lower and largest nearly square. Three linear spots of nearly equal size appear between the subcostal veinlets, near the apex, and a long rectangular spot surmounts the submedian vein about half way between the base and outer edge of the wing. All these spots are reproduced below. This species was discovered by Mr. E. A. Dodge, in Burcan County, Illinois. The first specimen was taken June 2oth, 1872. It was quite abundant upon grassy slopes on the high rolling prairie that forms the divide between the Illinois and Rock rivers. Over forty specimens were taken, nine of which were females. Two weeks later Hesperta Poweshetk, Parker, appeared abundantly in the same locality. The writer will exchange specimens of either of the above-mentioned species for most of those North American butterflies not of common occurrence in Northern Illinois. MISCELLANEOUS. Vanessa ANTIOPA, OR PaprLio ANTIOPA ?—The unusual abundance of this insect in many parts of Europe the present year, and its great influx into England, have given it unusual prominence in late numbers of our trans-Atlantic Entomological periodicals. I have been a little interested in watching to see how many of the writers would follow our friend Scudder’s “ Revision,” and call the insect “ Papilio Antiopa,” and have not yet met with one.—C. V. R., St. Louris, Mo. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 219 VANESSA ANTIOPA.—The present autumn has been remarkable for the appearance in. scattered localities all over the country of one of our rarest and most beautiful butterflies, the Camberwell Beauty, Vanessa Antiopa, very few British specimens of which exist in our cabinets. The Entomologist records the capture of upwards of 200 specimens in all parts of the country, from the Channel Islands to Aberdeen. It is very remarkable that they nearly all differ in colouring to a perceptible extent from the Continental variety, the border being creamy white. instead of buff-coloured. If they are genuine natives their spasmodic appearance in this manner is very singular, and worthy of careful observation. Several other rare butterflies, especially Argynnis Lathonia, Pieris Daplidice, and Colias Hlyale, have also been unusually abundant this season.—/Vatnre. Tue RapisH Buc.—A New Iwnsecr. (lVysius raphanus, N. sp.)* This insect has never heretofore been described ; the reason, we suppose, _is that it has not hitherto attracted the notice of farmers and gardeners as a destructive insect. We have noticed it this season, for the first, attacking radishes, mustards and lettuce ; some have noticed it on cabbage, others on grapevines, and in Kansas it is doing great damage to the potato crop, and we are informed that a very imilar, if not the same species, attacks corn to an alarming extent ; but, as we have not as yet seen the species from corn, we cannot say that they are identical, but *NysIUs RAPHANUS, N. sp.—Body long, with numerous short hairs ; head and thorax cinerous ; eyes black; scutel blackish ; antennze pube- scent, four-jointed, chestnut brown, first and third joints about equal length, second, long as first and third, last, longer and thicker than third ; hemelytra semi-transparent, punctured, with brown nervures, outside at base hairy, interior terminal margin bound with a dark band, separated by the medial longitudinal nervure, membranous at tip; rostrum nearly as long as the antenne, four-jointed, extends a little beyond the origin of the posterior feet, blackish, paler at base ; coxz honey yellow ;. legs hirsute ; posterior femora blackish ; anterior and middle brown ; tibiz light brown, two tibial spurs ; tarsi three-jointed—first as long as second and third, third longer than second—tarsal claws black ; abdomen of males black ; females black above, beneath a whitish band near the base, from the band to the tip pale ; length to tip of hemelytra one-eighth of an inch ; rostrum one twenty-fourth of an inch.__WM. R. Howarp, Forsyth, Mo. 220 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. suppose that they are. It seems to be almost a general feeder, as it is not confined to any particular order of plants for its food, though in this locality it seems to confine its ravages mostly to CRUCIFER#. They will congregate on the plant as long as there is room for one of them, and continue sucking the life-supporting juices, which soon causes the plant to wiltand die. They are very active, and, when disturbed, swarm like so many gnats, which they more resemble, when flying, than anything else. In the morning, while the due is on the plants, they are found concealed in the shriveled up leaves, and are rather sluggish ; and by plucking these and putting them into an old tin pail, with live coals of fire at the bottom, many of them may be destroyed. Lime has been tried to a slight extent, but seemingly without effect. We have not discovered either the eggs or the young, yet like their cousin, the chinch bug, wet weather is unfavor- able to their production, and after a heavy rain it will be difficult to find many of them for several days. We give herewith the first description of this insect, to our knowledge, that has been written. The specific name, raphanus, was given it from its food plant, the radish, upon which we first noticed it. It belongs to the sub-order Heteroptera; and, like most insects of that order, is not by any means destitute of that unpleasant “bed buggy” smell. We hope by the end of the season to be able to procure the eggs and young, and to be able to write a more complete history. Notre ON HESPERIA COMMUNIS, Grefe.—This species, which is described as Syricthus communis on page 69 of this volume, 1s identical with Mr. Scudder’s Hesferia tessellata, described in the Fourth Annual Report of the Trustees of the Peabody Academy of Science, Salem, 1872. As I learn from Mr. Edwards and Mr. Scudder, my description was written in 1871 and published in April, 1872. Mr. Scudders paper, in which his description of this species occurs, was, according to page 1 of the Report, ‘read, accepted and ordered to be printed,” Jan. 13th, 1872. I do not know the exact date of the issue of the Report from the press. A similarity of name with that proposed by Mr. Scudder, in an European species (47. tessel/um) might assist in according a preference to the name I have proposed as above for our American species.—A. R. GROTE. THe American Enromorocist.—I have a few bound copies of the two volumes of this periodical, which I will send post-paid by mail upon receipt of $3.50 per volume, or $6.50 for both. Address C. V. Rivey, Room 29, Insurance Building, St. Louis, Mo. Che Canadian Entomolocist. WOLSLVan > LONDON, ONT. DECEMBER; 1872, No. 12 MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V: T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 209 YPSOLOPHUS. I. Y. eupatoriella. WN. sp. Tongue dark brown; basal joint of the palpi, and the second joint externally, and on the under surface, dark brown ; upper surface pale ochreous ; tip white ; third joint dark ochreous, tipped with dark brown. Head pale bronzy brown, with purplish reflections, each scale tipped with white. Sides of the thorax and base of the wings ochreous yellow, extending along the costal portion of the wings, gradually narrowing to about the middle of the costa. A. median, longitudinal, wide, violaceous, brown band extends over the thorax and along the extreme dorsal margin of the wings, gradually becoming lighter in color till about the middle of the dorsal margin it unites with a bluish-purple wide band, which crosses the wing just behind the middle, gradually passing on the costal margin into the ochreous portion. Ufon the fold, beginning near the base, is a velvetty deep black stripe which extends, gradually widening, to the bluish-purple band, and is deeply scalloped next to the ochreous portion of the wing, which it separates from the dorsal margin, The bluish-purple band is narrowly margined externally by an ochreous line, followed by a narrow black line, behind which, to the apex, the wing is dark brown with faint ochreous or purplish reflections, the ciliz also being of the same hue, with a row of eight or nine small ochreous dots or streaks extending around their base. Under surface and legs bronzy dark brown ; tarsi annulate with pale ochreous. The larva is greenish-white, over half an inch long. It feeds upon the under side of a folded leat of Zupatorium ageratoides,folding it so as to apply one of the large veins to the midrib. It became a pupa under the folded edge of the leaf, July 12, and the imago emerged July 20. It is much the handsomest species of the genus known to me. 222 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 2. Y. Reedella. WN. sp. Palpi yellowish-brown, paler on the internal surface of the second and upper surface of the third joint. Tongue brownish. Face grayish-white. Antenne, head and thorax slightly iridescent, pale yellowish-brown, faintly suffused with roseate; there is a large brown spot on the centre of the anterior margin of the thorax, which sends a narrow streak to each side of the apex,and a btown spot on each side in front of the wings. Anterior wings suffused and dusted with brown upon a ground color of yellowish- ochreous, especially along the dorsal margin towards the base. Two large spots on the disc, and the apical portion of the wing dark brown. (To the naked eye the spots appear rather to be irregular, not well defined fasciz.) About five minute brown dots around the dorso-apical margin, one of which is at the extreme apex. Ciliz fulvous. Posterior wings very pale fuscous with a silvery tinge. Abdomen shining ochreous yellow, dusted thickly with brown, and with a dark brown, rather wide streak on the tergum, extending from the base half way to the apex ; venter pale ochreous yellow, with a distinct dark brown spot on each side of each segment, and a faint one in the middle. Under surface of the thorax white, legs brown on their anterior surfaces, tarsi brown, annulate with white. Alar ex. 5g inch. Larva unknown. Captured in September at the lamp. The vertex is narrow elongate. Wings rather elongate in proportion to width. Abdomen conical. Named for Mr. E. B. Reed, of the Can. ENT. Possibly this may be a variety of Y. pometellus, Harris, but I think it is different. I have other specimens agreeing with some of Dr, Fitch’s varieties of Pometellus, but 1 am by no means sure that he is right in regarding them as mere varieties. Harris and Fitch place all these species in Chetochilus, Steph. 3. Y. quercipominella. WN. sp. § Palpi dark purplish brown, sprinkled with white on the under and outer sufaces ; upper and inner surfaces and tip pale ochreous. Tongue and maxillary palpi pale purplish-brown. Antennae dark purplish brown. Head, thorax, and costa at the base, ochreous yellow, tinged with pur- plish fuscous in some lights. Costal half of the wings, beyond the base, pale ochreous, with a row of minute dark brown dots on the costa; dorsal half dark purplish-brown, twice faintly notched in the basal half. An ochreous streak around the dorso-apical margin, containing about six small, dark purplish or brown dots. Costo-apical ciliae ochreous, extreme s THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 223 apical ciliae purplish brown, dorso-apical ciliae ochreous, streaked with purplish brown. Posterior wings and ciliae pale slate color. Abdomen purplish-brown. The vertex and anterior wings are very much elongate and narrow, and the abdomen is sub-depressed. A/ar ex. 54 inch. The larva feeds in the ‘‘Oak Apple” (gall of Cynips spongifica, Harris.) Head yellowish, body green, dorsum dusky green, with two longitudinal whitish lines (which, under the lens, appear to be made of smull spots.) Iwo curved black lines on top of the first segment, and two black spots on each side of it; eight black spots on each of the next three segments, and five on each of the remainder, except the penultimate and ante-penultimate. It became a pupa June 7th, and the imago emerged June 16th. Kentucky. The wings do not differ from Dr. Clemens’ description of Y. /lavivit- tellus, but he says: “head, antennae and palpi fuscous.” This resembles, but I think is different from VY. ( Chetochilus } contubernalellus, Fitch. 4. Y. querciella. LV. sp. Tongue yellowish, except the basal part, which is brown. Palpr yellowish on the inner surface, brick red, suffused with fuscous on the outer surface, especially at the base of the second joint. Antennae pale yellowish, the apical half of each joint brown on the upper surface. Face pale yellowish, slightly iridescent. Vertex, thorax and anterior wings pale brick red, with a pink tinge, the wings sparsely but distinctly dusted with dark brown, especially the apical portion, and with nine small dark brown dots around the apex. Abdomen ochreous yellow above, brownish beneath, with two pale ochreous yellow lines. A/ar ex. over 34 inch. Kentucky. The mature larva is nearly one inch long; when nearly mature, the frst segment and head are grayish ferruginous with a tinge of rufous; remaining segments greenish, with the posterior margin of each whitish. There are two dorsal longitudinal white lines, and one on each side, and six to eight black spots on each segment. Before becoming a pupa it became bright brick red on top, and pinkish-yellow on the sides. (Another instance of the colors of the imago assumed by the larva.) It » became a pupa June 2nd, and the imago emerged June rth. This is, in one respect, a singular insect. _It is much larger and more robust than the preceding species (Y. guercifominella,) but in all other THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. nS) bo pe respects the structure of the two insects is identical, except that while the forewings of that species are very long and narrow, and almost pointed, in this their width at the apex is more than one-fourth of their length, with the costo-apical angle rather sharply, and the dorso-apical very obtusely rounded, and the apex oblique and a little concave. Yet the neuration does not differ. There is a similar difference in the shape of the hind wings, but none in the neuration. But for the palpi, it would, in external appearance, resemble a Zortrix. 5. Y.caryefoliella. WN. sp. Tongue yellowish, except at the base, where it is brownish. Palpi dark purplish-brown; except the inner surface, which is pale yellowish, and the apex of the tuft, which is dusky grey. Head, antennae and thorax reddish-golden, suffused with fuscous, in some lights appearing dark golden, in others reddish-brown. Antennae with pale annulations. Anterior wings with a silky lustre, dark yellowish-red suffused with fuscous, shining, some portions of the wing appearing almost slate color, whilst others are dark purplish-red, changing with the light ; two or three minute blackish dots upon the disc ; posterior wings plumbeous. Legs brown upon their anterior, yellowish on their interior surfaces. A/ar ex. 1% inch. Kentucky. The structure of this insect is identical with that of the preceding (VY. guerciella), except that the anterior wings are scarcely so wide in proportion to their length. It resembles it closely, but may be dis- tinguished by the slightly narrower wings, which have a little wider expanse and have more of a deep dull red, and are not of so bright a brick red. ; The larva sews together the leaves of Hickory trees (Cary@ alba.) When taken (June 6th) it was about 34 of an inch long, green, with six narrow, and some of them interrupted, white stripes which did not quite reach the anal segment ; head ferruginous ; the following segment brown ; true feet black. The next day it became white suffused with pink, and the longitudinal stripes became deep pink. On the roth it became a~ pupa, and on the 23rd the imago emerged. I should regard this as a variety of J]. guerciel/a but for the decided differences in the larva. 6. Y. Straminiella. WN. sp. Tongue and second joint of palpi brown, faintly tinged with golden ; third joint and apex of the second, pale straw colour. Antennae pale straw colour, each joint tipped above with brown. Head, thorax and THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 225 eee anterior wings pale straw color, thickly dusted with brown. (By artificial light under the lens the dusting becomes golden brown, or bright reddish- golden.) In the apical part of the wing the dusting is dense and assumes the form of an indistinct, irregular, transverse line. Four small spots of the same hue with the dusting, one above the fold, not far from the base, two others opposite each other about the basal fourth, one on the fold, the other on the disc; the other which is, rather, a short streak, about the middle of the wing, the four forming an elongate coffin-shaped figure. (The spots and dusting are only visible under the lens, and to the naked eye, the wings appear of a straw color with a satiny lustre.) Posterior wings silvery, their ciliac straw color. Abdomen conical, straw color dusted with brown. Legs brownish ; tarsi brown, annulate with white. Alar ex. Ys inch. Captured June 16th,in Kentucky. Larva unknown. The vertex is not greatly elongate, and the wings are rather wide in proportion to their length, and the antennae are microscopically pubes- cent. I think it must resemble closely Y. punctiatscel/us, Clem. SAGARITIS,* gen. 100. In the absence of any extended means of reference to the works of European Entomologists,and being unable to locate the species below described in any genus known to me, I have been led to establish for it this genus. Possibly it may belong to Chetochi/us, Steph. Slender, graceful in appearance. Legs rather long; wings narrow. Maxillary palpi minute, tongue moderate ; labial palpi long, recurved, the terminal joint acicular, and almost hidden by the tuft of the second joint, which projects upwards and forwards, instead of downwards and forwards, as in Ypsolophus (which otherwise resembles this genus as to the head and palpi.) Vertex narrow elongate. Antennae slender, simple, more than half as long as the wings. Anterior wings elongate, narrow, faintly falcate beneath the apex. Discal cell closed ; the costal attains the margin just behind the middle ; subcostal, furcate near the margin, which it attains before the apex, and sending off in its course three branches to the costal margin, one from about the middle, one before the discal vein, and one at the discal vein. Median, furcate beyond the discal vein, both branches attaining the dorsal margin at about the apical fifth; the discal vein sends off three branches, all of which attain the posterior margin behind the apex, the upper branch being furcate ; sub-median furcate near the base. Posterior wing a little *Sagaritis -A wood Nymph. 226 . THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. wider than the forewing, falcate beneath the apex ; discal cell short, rather wide, closed by a bow-shaped, oblique discal vein ; costal vein and basal portion of the subcostal almost coincident with the costal margin, the subcostal curving downwards towards the discal vein, and again upwards from the discal vein to the apex, before which it becomes furcate, sending a branch to the costal margin above, and another below the apex; the discal vein sends.a branch to the dorsal margin from its middle ; the median is furcate from the discal vein, and sends a branch to the post- erior margin from about the middle of the cell ; submedian and internal, simple. It therefore approaches Y/so/ophus in the neuration, as well as in the palpi. It is still more nearly allied to Anorthosia, Clem., but the neuration is quite distinct. S. gracilella. NN. sp. Pale ochreous yellow. A small brown spot on the costa near the base, another on the fold about midway of the length of the wing, and another nearly opposite it near the costa. A row of small brown spots extending around the apex. Wing sparsely and faintly dusted with brown. A/ar — ex. not quite 34 inch. Kentucky. Larva unknown. . The body is slender and the legs rather long. A single specimen was taken May 7th, resting upon the trunk of a tree. When disturbed it fluttered around for a moment, re-alighting always on the same tree. DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN HYMENOPTERA, No. 4 BY E. T. CRESSON, Continued from Vol, 4, Page 84. Genus Microctronus, Wesm. MICROCTONUS AGILIS. iV. sf.—Z. Piceous, shining; clypeus and mandibles testaceous ; palpi whitish; antenne longer than head and thorax, slender, fuscous, basal third pale; pleura beneath, rufo-piceous ; tegulz whitish ; wings hyaline, iridescent ; nervures and stigma fuscous, the latter large, lanceolate ; marginal cell longer than stigma, lanceolate ; legs, including coxz, pale honey-yellow, extreme tips of posterior tibie dusky ; abdomen smooth, shining, depressed, first segment tinged with rufo-piceous, gradually dilated to apex. Length .10 inch. ffab.—Illinois. One specimen. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. _ 227 Genus EupHorus, Nees. Eupnorus scutptus. JV. sf.—Q Black ; head shining, pale yellow- ferruginous ; spot enclosing ocelli, and occiput black ; palpi fuscous ; antennz long, slender, entirely black; mesothorax finely punctured, somewhat shining ; scutellum, metathorax and first abdominal segment densely rugose, opaque ; metathorax broad, abruptly truncate behind ; tegulz rufo-piceous; wings faintly dusky, nervures and stigma fuscous, the latter broad ; legs dull ferruginous, coxae black, four posterior tro- chanters, femora at base, and more or less of their tibiae and tarsi blackish ; abdomen beyond first segment sub-ovate, flattened, smooth and polished ; first segment broadly dilated at tip; ovipositor pale, nearly as long as abdomen, sheaths black and thickened at tips. Length .15 inch. /fab.—lllinois. One specimen. EUPHORUS MELLIPES. JV. sf.—{. Black, shining; face with dense silvery-white pile; clypeus and mandibles, except tips, pale ferruginous ; palpi pale ; antennae pale ferruginous, more or less dusky toward tips, the joints short and distinct; thorax gibbous, minutely sculptured ; meta- thorax rounded, opaque, coarsely granulated; tegulae pale; wings hyaline, iridescent, nervures pale yellowish, stigma fuscous, paler at base ; legs, iucluding coxae, honey-yellow, tips of posterior tibiae and more or less of their tarsi dusky ; abdomen small, sub-ovate beyond first segment, depressed, smooth and polished, rufo-piceous ; first segment gradually dilated to apex, longitudinally aciculated, black ; venter pale rufo-piceous. Length .13 inch. Hab.—New Jersey; Illinois. Three specimens. EupuHoRus scitutus. V..sf.—¥. Head sub-globose, honey-yellow; spot covering ocelli and tips of mandibles black ; antennae about as long as head and thorax, pale fuscous, honey-yellow at base, the joints short, pale sericeous ; thorax honey-yellow, darker than head, mesothorax and scutellum fuscous; tegulae pale ; wings hyaline, iridescent, nervures and stigma fuscous, the latter large, sub-triangular, marginal cell very short, about one-third the length of stigma; legs, including coxae, pale honey- yellow, posterior femora, tibiae and tarsi more or less dusky ; abdomen smooth shining, fuscous, first and base of second segment honey-yellow. Length .08 inch. fTab.—lllinois. One specimen. 228 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGISY. Genus LEIOPHRON, Nees. LEIOPHRON LAEVIS. JV. s6—fZ. Deep black, shining ; head small, face with a large shining prominence ; mandibles dark rufous; palpi dusky ; antennae abcut as long as body, black, scape dull rufe-picecus; thorax finely punctured, middle lobe of mesothorax prominent, as also the. scutellum ; metathorax opaque, coarsely rugose, rather abrupt posteriorly, on each side above a rather deep longitudinal groove, curving inwardly and meeting on posterior face ; tegulae dull rufous ; wings hyaline, faintly dusky towards apex, nervures and stigma pale fuscous; legs, including coxae, honey-yellow, posterior coxae blackish at base and beneath, tips cf their tibiae and their tarsi slightly dusky ; abdomen regularly fusiform from base to apex, first segment black, broad at apex, minutely and rather indistinctly aciculated longitudinally ; remainder of abdomen piceous, smooth and polished. Length .20 inch. ffab.—Canada. (Pettit.) One specimen. Genus Catyptus, Haliday. (Brachistes, Wesm.) CaLyptus major. WV. s6—Q. Deep black, shining; head trans- verse, vertex and face irregular, densely punctured, the latter wide, occiput and cheeks smooth ; eyes small; clypeus tinged with rutous ; mandibles ferruginous, black at tips; palpi whitish ; antennae as‘long as head and thorax, brown black, scape pale brown; thorax shining, mesothoracic lobes prominent, sometimes tinged with brown, central lobe truncate anteriorly, sutures coarsely crenulated ; tegulae honey-yellow ; wings faintly dusky, nervures and stigma black ; legs honey-yellow, coxae and trochanters paler, posterior tibiae fuscous, pale at base, basal joint ‘of their tarsi dusky ; abdomen sub-compressed towards apex, smooth and polished, more or less tinged with piceous; first segment longitudinally aciculated ; ovipositor as long as body, honey-yellow, sheaths black. Length .18—.22 inch. ffab.—Canada ; Virginia; Illinois. Four specimens. CALYpTuS ROTUNDicEPS. JV. s6—Z. Black, smooth and polished; head nearly globose ; mouth brown; palpi whitish ; antennae nearly as long as body, slender, brown-black, basal third luteous beneath ; tegulae, basal nervures of wings, and legs, pale luteous; wings hyaline, sub- iridescent, faintly dusky at tips, stigma and nervures piceous; apical half of posterior tibiae bJackish behind; abdomen smooth and polished, depressed, basal segment longitudinally aciculated. Length .16 inch. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 229 Hfab.—Illinois. One specimen. Catyptus TipiaToR. WV. sf.—f. Black, shining ; head transversely subquadrate ; clypeus, except base, and mandibles, fulvous ; palpi white ; antennae brown-black above, fulvo-testaceous beneath ; tegulae and basal wing nervures honey-yellow ; wings hyaline, iridescent, stigma and _ner- vures fuscous ; legs pale luteous, spot on tips of posterior femora above, their tibiae except base, and tips of their tarsi, blackish ; abdomen short, depressed, shining, two basal segments longitudinally aciculated when viewed under a‘strong lens, the first segment with-two longitudinal carinae, converging at apex. Length .10 inch. Hab.—New Jersey. One specimen. Smaller than rotundiceps, which it closely resembles. CaLypTus MExIcaNus. WV. sf.— f. Deep black, sub-opaque, clothed with a very short whitish pile; head transverse; mandibles and palpi brown ; antennae brown-black ; middle lobe of mesothorax with a central longitudinal ridge, the sutures broad and deep, meeting on the disc before posterior margin ; two deep square depressions before scutellum; meta- ’ thorax coarsely reticulated ; depressions of pleura and pectus coarsely striated; tegulae piceous; wings hyaline, iridescent, slightly dusky at tips ; legs black, more or less tinged with brownish, the four anterior tarsi pale fuscous ; abdomen sub-convex, coarsely and longitudinally aciculated or striated, first segment with two prominent longitudinal carinae, con- verging towards apex, apical margin of second segment narrowly smooth and polished. Length .20 inch. Hab.—Orizaba, Mexico. (Prof. Sumichrast.) One specimen. Genus Eupapizon, Nees. EUBADIZON MACULIVENTRIS, Cesson, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., Nov., 1872. ffab.—Texas. One ff specimen. EUBADIZON LATERALIS. WV. sf.—Z. Pale honey-yellow; palpi whitish ; spot covering ocelli and occiput fuscous ; antennae nearly as long as body, fuscous above, testaceous beneath, pale at base ; mesothorax except sides of middle lobe, scutellar region and metathorax above blackish ; metathorax rounded above, smooth, without carinae; wings hyaline, iridescent, stigma and nervures fuscous; legs paler than body, tips of posterior femora, their tibiae and tarsi blackish, bases of their 230 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. tibiae narrowly whitish ; abdomen sub-opaque, blackish above, apical corners of first segment, and spot at sides of remaining segments pale honey-yellow ; ovipositor nearly as long as body, sheaths blackish. Length .14 inch. ffab.—Illlinois. One specimen. Much smaller than: maculiventris, and differently marked. EUBADIZON PLEURALIS. JV. sf..— JZ 2. Black, smooth and shining ; mandibles dull testaceous; palpi whitish; antennae long and slender, brown beneath, paler at base ; mesothorax more or less tinged with testa- ceous ; scutellum pale testaceous; pleura honey-yellow; tegulae and basal wing nervures whitish; wings hyaline, beautifully iridescent, nervures dusky, stigma pale, sub-hyaline ; legs, including coxae, pale yellowish- white, tarsi more or less and tips of posterior tibiae dusky ; abdomen entirely black, shining ; ovipositor of ? rather longer than body, honey- yellow, sheaths black. Length .16—.18 inch. ffab.—Missouri. (Riley.) Three specimens. _EUBADIZON AMERICANUS. JV. sf.—Q. Black, shining; mandibles and palpi pale testaceous; antennae brown-black, as long as head and thorax, scape piceous above, testaceous beneath ; metathorax rugose, with a deep depression on each side above, behind the middle; tegulaé and basal wing nervures pale honey-yellow; wings faintly dusky, sub- iridescent, nervures and stigma fuscous, the latter large and sometimes black ; legs, including coxae, honey-yellow, the tarsi and posterior tibiae except base, blackish ; the first, and second except apex, longitudinally roughened, the remainder smooth and polished, base of first segment with two elevated carinae ; ovipositor longer than body. Length .18—.20 inch. Hab.—New Jersey. Ten specimens. Distinguished from p/euralis by the entirely black thorax, dark stigma and wing nervures and roughened base of abdomen.. Genus ICHNEUTES, Nees. ICHNEUTES ABDOMINALIS, Cress. Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., Nov., 1872. Hab.—Texas. (Belfrage.) One 2 specimen. ICHNEUTES BICOLOR. JV. sf.—@. Black, clothed with a very short whitish sericeous pile, very dense on the face; mandibles and palpi dull testaceous ; thorax smooth and shining, metathorax opaque; tegulae honey-yellow ; wings hyaline, iridescent, costal nerve black, lower margin THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 231 of stigma and nervures fuscous ; legs, including coxae, honey-yellow, tarsi ‘varied with dusky ; abdomen fulvo-ferruginous, base of first segment and apical and lateral margins of third and following segments black ; first and second segments opaque, roughened, remaining segments smooth and shining. Length .zo inch. Hlab.—Massachusetts. One specimen. ICHNEUTES FULVIPES. JV. sf.—Z. — Black, shining, face and pleura clothed with pale glittering pile, longer and more dense on the face ; mandibles and palpi dull testaceous ; antennae dark brown ; tegulae and space in front honey-yellow; metathorax rough, opaque; wings faintly dusky at tips, iridescent, costal nerve black, lower half of stigma and the nervures fuscous ; legs, including coxae, pale honey-yellow, tarsi more or less tinged with dusky; two basal segments roughened, opaque, very obscurely tinged with dull rufous, remaining segments black, smooth and shining. Length .17 inch. fTab.—Illinois. One specimen. ‘This may prove to be the ~ of bicolor. (To be Continued.) INSECTS OF THE NORTHERN PARTS OF BRITISH AMERICA COMPILED BY THE EDITOR. From Kirby's Fauna Boreali-Americana: Insecta. (Continued from Page 198.) 281. CHRYSOMELA CONFINIS A7rdy.—Length of body 4% lines. A single specimen taken in Nova Scotia by Capt. Hall. . Nearly related to the preceding species. Body oblong, obscurely bronzed-green, grossly punctured. Palpi, antennae, legs, and rhinarium ferruginous: punctures of the prothorax scattered in masses, with the interstices very minutely punctured: scutellum bronzed: elytra reddish with a discoidal flexuose irregular pale stripe dilated at the base and towards the apex; there are also two flexuose dark-green discoidal stripes in the disk, the exterior one nearly reaching the base and the interior approaching nearer to the apex, between these towards the base is a single oblong green spot, and outside them are many irregular ones of the same colour; all these spots and stripes are convex and mostly circumscribed 2,32 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. by punctures ; there is a double series of punctures diverging towards the base ; and an oblique abbreviated one between these and the scutellum, as in many farpadlidae, &c.; the interstice between the double series is green at the base. There is a lateral series of punctures also as in C. Philadel phica. |Synonymous with C. Sfzraeae Say. Taken on Lake Superior- by Agassiz. | [212.] 282. CHRySOMELA Bicspyana Kirby.—Length of body 4 lines. Asingle 2 specimen taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. [Taken in Ontario. | Colour and sculpture of the body like those of the preceding species, from. which C. Bigsbyana differs principally in having the sides and the anterior margin of the prothorax reddish-yellow ; the elytra are of the same colour, but the suture itself, especially at the base, a stripe parallel to it, a large humeral bilobed spot, the interior lobe of which is obtus- angular or broken, and several irregular dots and spots on the elytra are black-green. 283. CHRYSOMELA MULTIPUNCTATA Say.—Length of body 4% lines. Taken frequently in the journey from New York to Cumberland House. [Taken in Canada. ] Body, head, antennae, and legs, ferruginous. Prothorax pale-yellow, with two posterior triangular ferruginous spots with a dot of the same colour between them ; the punctures of the prothorax are more numerous and smaller than in C. Philadelphica, &c.; elytra yellowish-white; suture and a confluent stripe circumscribed with the double series of punctures, diverging towards the base of the elytra, ferruginous ; surface covered with irregular greenish dots and short lines, as in the preceding species, a row of punctures marks the exterior side of the elytra, the interstice between it and the margin is immaculate and impunctured, the rest of the elytrum being thickly covered with scattered minute punctures. [213.] 284. CHRYSOMELA CLIVICOLLIS A7réy.—Length of body 4% lines. A single specimen taken in Canada by Dr. Bigsby. Body between oblong and hemispherical, violet. . Head punctured ; labrum without punctures: prothorax elevated in the centre to an obtuse peak, from the summit of which descend several concentric channels which run nearly to the margin, the interstices of which are punctured : scutellum violet with a green tint: elytra reddish, punctured, punctures scattered with some tendency to arrange into rows ; three large dark THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 233 violet spots distinguish the elytra, the first upon the shoulders subtri- angular with the vertex truncated, the second near the apex bilobed, the third at the base forming with that on the other elytrum a large cruciform spot ; suture violet: anterior thighs armed with two stout teeth. 285. CHRYSOMELA RUFIPES De (eer.—Length of body 234 lines. A single specimen taker’ in the Expedition. [214.] The American differs a little from the British specimens. In the first place it is scarcely half the size, not only the mouth but the space before and between the eyes is rufous, only the vertex and occiput being black: the black spot of the prothorax, instead of consisting of two distinct spots connected only at their base, is only divided at its apex into two lobes, and the spots of the elytra though similarly arranged, are less distinct: they agree in having the body underneath, except the rufous anus, black ; and the legs rufous. {Taken on Lake Superior by Agassiz’s Expedition. ] 286. PH#pon Aponipis Pallas.—Length of body 3-4 lines. Several specimens taken in Lat. 54°. [215.] Body black, punctured, sprinkled underneath with cinereous hairs. Vertex rufous with an occipital black spot: prothorax reddish- yellow, with a large discoidal black spot reaching from base to apex and constricted anteriorly ; on each side also there is a round black dot; scutellum black, impunctured: elytra reddish-yellow, thickly punctured with scattered punctures ; suture black except at the base; a black dis- coidal stripe or blotch reaching neither to the base nor the apex, anteriorly obliquely truncated and posteriorly acute, also distinguishes these organs. Variety B. With the discoidal stripe acute at each extremity and smaller. Variety C. With the discoidal stripe evanescent. [Taken at Fort Simpson, Mackenzie River, by Mr. Kennicott.] 287. PH#DON RapHani Fadr.—Length of body 2%=234 lines. Several taken in Lat. 54°. : Body oblong, punctured, glossy; underneath black with the disk a little bronzed, above green or green-gold. Head and prothorax minutely punctured ; five first joints of the antenne bronzed and glossy; the remainder cinereous and obscure: scutellum impunctured, violet: elytra 234 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGISTY. very thickly punctured, punctures not arranged in rows: parapleura cen- fluently punctured: disk of the postpectus bronzed and transversely striated with very slightly impressed striole. In the female the abdomen, as in PA. Polygont, is often so distended with eggs as to make the elytra appear abbreviated. Variety B. With the whole of the upper surface green, without any golden lustre. [This and the two following species are included in the genus Gastro- physa Chev. | [216.] 288. PH#DON poLycont Linn.—Length of body 2 lines, Taken in Nova Scotia by Dr. MacCulloch and Capt. Hall. [Very com- mon in Canada. | Body oblong-ovate, punctured, glossy, underneath black. Head deep blue, with an abbreviated channel in the vertex between the eyes; antennz piceous, with the first five joints rufous: prothorax convex, rufous: elytra deep blue, thickly punctured: legs rufous with piceous tarsi; anus rufous. 289. PHYLLoDEcTA VITELLIN® Zixn.—Length of body 2% lines. [217-] Body oblong, a little inclining to ovate, glossy ; underneath black-bronzed, scarcely punctured; above bronzed with a copper tint, minutely punctured. First and second joints of the antennae rufous: scutellum impunctured: elytra punctured in rows, with the interstices indistinctly punctured : tarsi piceous with the first joint rufous. [Taken on Lake Superior by Agassiz’s Expedition ; in Ontario, also.] Family Haticip#. 290. HALTICA (ORCHESTRIS) VICINA XAirby.-—Length of body 3% lines. A single specimen taken. Body underneath pale rufous with the disk of the postpectus black. Head punctured in the vertex, dirty-white, with a pair of contiguous black dots between the eyes and a subtriangular one on the nose; antennae black with the underside of the scape and the two next joints dusky- rufous: prothorax very minutely and lightly punctured, white with two irregular black spots placed obliquely on each side, and a black longitu- dinal streak between them: scutellum black: elytra very minutely and thickly punctured, with a sutural stripe common to both, a discoidal one rather nearer the lateral margin, and another just above it all black ;_ the intermediate stripe falls short of the apex of the elytra: the upper side of the tibiae is dusky, and the tarsi are black. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 935 [218.] 291. Haxrica (ORCHESTRIS) PUNCTICOLLIS A7réy.—Plate vii, fig. 9.—Length of body 234-3 lines. A single specimen taken in Lat. 65°. Taken also by Prof. Peck in New England ? Body subovate, very black, underneath glossy. Head irregularly punctured behind: antennae underneath pieeous at the base: prothorax very minutely and lightly punctured, pale-yellow with two black round dots in the disk between which above the scutellum is a less black tri_ angular impression: elytra very minutely and lightly punctured: forebreast pale-yellow. Variety B. Elytra with a blue tint. ILLUSTRATIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGY. We are indebted to the kindness of Prof. Townend Glover, Entomolo- gist of the Agricultural Department, Washington, for the first part of his new illustrated work on our North American insects. This part contains thirteen finely colored plates, in which are figured nearly all our described Orthoptera. The engravings, which are very beautiful, are from copper plates, and are, both in design and execution, the production of the talented author. We deem this work, of which the first number is merely introductory, one of very great merit, and sincerely hope that our esteemed friend will be enabled to continue it until the whole of his valuable material, which has cost him many years of patient labor and study, and which includes figures of a large proportion of our insects of all orders, may be given to the scientific world. We observe that this first edition of the first part, of fifty copies only, has been generously published at the authors own expense. It is not to be expected that so costly a work could be undertaken by any private individual ; we trust, therefore, that the Department of Agriculture, which he has so long, ably, and faithfully served, will at once recognize the - value of his labors, and that upon their recommendation, Congress will, with its accustomed liberality in all scientific matters, make such appro- priation as may enable the author to give the world the benefit of his patient and persevering study; the more especially as this work will treat _of the many insects injurious to vegetation, and will therefore be of immense practical value to Agriculturists as well as to Entomologists. 236 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. NOTES ON SOME GENERA OF CANADIAN INSECTS. BY FRANCIS WALKER, LONDON, ENGLAND. Genus Chadlcis. This genus comes next to Smicra, which has the greatest development of the peculiar characters of the family Cha/cididae, such as the compact antenne, the robust body, the large quadrate prothorax, and the much dilated hind thighs. In all these characters this family agrees with Leucospidae, from which it totally differs in the structure of the abdomen, and the two families have a supremacy of structure which is not wholly shared by any other in the tribe Chatcididae. Chalcis is followed by ffaltichella. In the latter, which attains its largest size in Australia, the above structure is less prominent, the insertion of the antenne descends from the snout towards the mouth, and the flagellum is more whip-like and has more active vibration, and resembles that of some species of Lincyrtus, to which genus /Za/tichel/a has also a resemblance in the short- ness of the ulna vein. Unlike Smicra, which chiefly dwells in S. America, Chalcis is spread somewhat equally and extensively over the globe. It consists of numerous forms which are generally closely allied to each other in structure and colouring, and are not easily distinguishable, and suggest the idea that species are now determinate and concise by the ubliteration of former links, and that in some cases these links are not yet extinct. The respective differences of these species require to be ‘concisely shown in a synopsis. In a few forms the abdomen of the female departs much from the usual structure, the apical part being attenuated and nearly cylindrical; an example of this occurs in the Amazon region and another in Arabia. In another case the male has pectinated antenne, and has been considered as a distinct genus. C. Healegon, an Australian species, has red antennz and a red abdomen, and thus differs remarkably from the rest, the colour being almost always black, the legs varied with yellow and sometimes partly red. C. minufa, a Canadian species, occurs in England and is more frequent in S. Europe ; it also inhabits the U.S., and is probably identical with C. aznudifes, so named from West Indian specimens, and it may be supposed to have spread northward in both continents, and we have but to assume a continuous belt of tropic land in former times, round the globe and connecting continents in the Atlantic and Pacific, and alternate change of climate, and then the more or less extent of insect species becomes a mere question of time. C. /lavipes THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ys inhabits S. Europe, and also occurs in China, and was probably there and in Hindostan before it came into Europe. These two species are thus examples of the two affinities of the European insect race, one with North America, the other with North Asia, and both increasing northward. Many genera of insects may be traced from the tropics northward, and their species may be observed in successively smaller circles till they attain their highest latitude. The distribution of the insect race by migration, and the variety thereby of their kinds in different regions, afford far greater proofs of the design, and contrivance, and wisdom of the Creator, than would have been manifested by their immediate appearance in the spots where they now exist. MISCELLANEOUS. MELIT#A Harrisit.—Mr. W. H. Edwards, of Coalburgh, W. Va. has, during the past summer, reared the larva of Melitea Harrisit: It was found feeding on Actinomerus squarrosa, a composite plant allied to Flelianthus. It is probable that this species, so widely distributed, feeds on many of these closely allied plants in different localities.—W. SAUNDERS. OsMIA CANADENSIS Cresson.—This insect, which was described .by Mr. E. T. Cresson, of Philadelphia in the Pro. Ent. Soc., Phila., vol. 3, p. 23, has been found destructive to the foliage of some strawberry plants, by Mr. J. Pettit, of Grimsby, who has kindly furnished me with specimens. It was observed : : during the past season in the Township of Oxford. For the accompanying figure, which represents the female, I am indebted to my esteemed friend, Mr. Cresson, who very kindly made the drawing from which the ent was engraved. I am also indebted to him for the determination of the species. In the figure the insect is repre- sented on an enlarged scale, the hair line at the side showing its natural length. In both sexes the head, thorax, and abdomen are green, and more or less densely covered with whitish down or short hairs, those on 238 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. - the thorax being longest. The female is larger than the male. The male is fully described by Mr. Cresson in the volume above mentioned, to which the reader is referred. Mr. Pettit says “‘the insects were taken in East Oxford, July 2nd, on a few strawberry plants in my brother’s garden. The plants, perhaps nearly roo in number, had been nearly all denuded of their leaves, and a search in the evening having failed to reveal the authors of the mischief, I - examined them again in the heat of the day, and found the little culprits actively engaged in nibbling away the remaining shreds of the leaves They appeared to chew the fragments into a pulp, and carry it away, but. the little time I spent in observing them was insufficient to determine anything further respecting their habits.” . Doubtless the leaves so consumed were used either in the construction or lining of their nests.—W. SAUNDERS. Notes ON SoME BUTTERFLIES AND THEIR LARva.—We extract the following interesting details in reference to the life history of some of our butterflies, from a letter received from Mr. W. H. Edwards, of Coal- burgh, West Virginia, U. S., under date of October 12th :—W. S. “*T have in all, probably 200 eggs of Argynnis Cybele, some deposited on violet leaves, and some on the cloth that covered the keg in which I confined the females, with the growing plant, and I suppose half of them have given larvae. I also had quite a number of eggs of Aphrodite, and a few larve from them. I endeavored this time to avoid dryness, as the contrary state seemed to be most natural to these larvee,and I attained this end by placing wet sand in the bottom of a glass goblet,in which sand were stuck small sprigs, or single leaves of different sorts of wild violets, all the species I could find hereabouts at this season; I also tried the pansy. The goblets I covered with damp cloths.” “The young larvz, as soon as hatched, were transferred to these various leaves, and as none have died—although three weeks have. elapsed since the first were hatched—I think they must be healthy. They are but little bigger than when hatched, but must have eaten for some days, as they were then pretty lively, but I have been unable to discover on the leaves any visible evidence of feeding. I presume they eat the surface of the leaf, not the edge. For a week past I have seen no sign of motion, but the larvae remain in the same position. In the grooves of the larger violet leaves are several, three or four in a row, and I notice that the THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 239 folded edges of leaves are sure to contain some tenants. These larvee are about one-tenth of an inch in length, very hairy; and they have a way, when touched, of doubling themselves up, and it is easy to handle them then by a pin witha bent point. I find | can lift them off a leaf even when they are lethargic, by means of the pin, and transfer them to another leaf, when they straighten themselves cut slowly and then resume their first position. Ass it will be impossible for me to carry them through the winter on fresh violet leaves, I shail have to place the leaves now occupied in t'n boxes or some other suitable vessels, and trust to skill or good luck, hoping that by one or the other of these some of the larvae may reach next spring alive.” “On looking over the old volumes of the Can. Ent., I see your description of Libythea Bachmanii. There is a query about Motya in the September number of the magazine. Iam sure that Bachmannitz is the species found in the Northern States and Canada. JZ. Motya I do not know. Scudder says it isa West Indian species, and perhaps found in -our Southern States. Bachmannii varies much, especially in the appear- ance of underside of secondaries, some being of a uniform brown, and others beautifully shaded with brown and fuscous or ashen. I had the good fortune to raise a brood this season from the egg, and found both the varieties spoken of, among the butterflies. I will try to find time to write a history of these larvae for the ENromo.Locist soon. I have also partially raised from the egg a brood of Afpatura celtis, but after the second moult they seem to have undertaken their winter's sleep. The eggs of both these species are very interesting.” —W. H. Epwarps. SiR JoHn Luppock’s Pet Wasp.—From the Daily Telegraph, London, England.— One of the most curious attendants this year at the gathering of the British Association in Brighton, was a little gentleman in brown overcoat, with black and yellow nether garments, wearing a sharp sword poisoned at the tip. . We are inclined to thirk that, next to Mr. Stanley, this visitor might be called by far the most remarkable and best worth attention among all the assembled notorieties. It was Sir John Lubbock’s pet wasp; and the respect which would naturally be paid to any friend of the benevolent savant who has given London its new holi- days, was really due to this insect on its own account. Captured in a nest of soft grey paper in the Pyrenees, the wasp was the very first of its species that had ever received an education. Sir John exhibited it to the members of the Association with just pride, as a proof of what kindness 240 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ’ and patience can effect upon the most unpromising creatures ; and even ' Mr. Forster might have wondered to see it come out of the glass bottle where it lives, eat sugar from its master’s fingers, allow him to stroke its striped back, and fly round and round his head, returning always to its — home in the bottle. At first, says its distinguished educator, it was “rather too ready with its sting,” but now it never thinks of unsheathing the tiny rapier at its tail; and nobody who saw the insect could doubt that its nature had been greatly changed. A PLaGvue of butterflies is a rare-occurrence. A short time ago, how- ever, the town of Florence was invaded by a prodigious quantity of these insects. All the distance of the Long’arno between the Piazza Manin and the Barriera and in all the adjacent streets the passage was almost obstructed by an.extraordinary quantity of butterflies that had swarmed in such thick clouds round the gaslights that the streets were compar- atively dark. Fires were immediately lighted by order of the Municipality and by private citizens, in which the butterflies burnt their wings, so that half an hour afterwards one walked on a layer formed by the bodies of the butterflies an inch thick !!! They were of a whitish colour, and some of the streets appeared as if covered with snow, at least so say the Italian papers.— ature. Our ANNUAL ReEportT.—We expect to be able to mail to each of our members a copy of the Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario to the Department of Agriculture for 1872, sometime during the month of January, 1873. ‘It will treat of insects injurious to the straw- berry, grape, potato, hop, and maple. There will also be a chapter on beneficial insects, and a short history of some of our more common innoxious insects, all illustrated as far as possible by suitable figures. PIERIS VERNALIS.—Mr. G. M. Dodge writes us from Lllinois that on October 16th and roth, 1872, he captured two male specimens of this butterfly, but that the cold weather then coming on, he saw no more. He enquires if it is not a little remarkable that this species should occur in the fall? and if the fact does not militate against the idea entertained that vernalts is the spring brood of P. protodice.—E. B. R. THE AMERICAN ENTOMoLOGIST.—I have a few bound copies of the two volumes of this periodical, which I will send post-paid by mail upon receipt of $3.50 per volume, or $6.50 for both. Address C. V. RILEy, Room 29, Insurance Building, St. Louis, Mo. INDEX TO VOLUME IY. -——— +0 A Toe Aa on Georgian Butterflies, 73, 84. Acanthocinus pusillus, 55, Achalerus lycidas, 76, 86. Acmaeors longicornis, 116. a longiceps, 118. proteus, 117, 118. Acronycta occidentalis, notes on larva of, Acronycta psi, 49, 50 52. AcoRN Moth, 15 Adrasteia gen. nov., 149. rb alexandriacella, n. sp., 149. fasciella, n. sp., 149. querciella, n. sp., 207. quercifoliella, n. sp., 206. Aglossa debi.is, 198. Aygnippe gen. nov. “ biscolore!la, n. sp., 195. fuscopulvella, n. sp , 195, Agrilus bivittatus, 35. “* pilineatus, 35. Agriotes mancus, 3. ** obscurus, 4. Agrotis jaculifera, 137. Alypia Langtonii, 205. “ octomaculata, 205. og Association, meeting of, 87, 145, ae “ee “ oe AMERICAN Entomologist, 19, 220. American Lepidoptera, new illustrated works on, 158, Anaphora, descriptions of, 137. st arcanella, 143. agrotipennella, 137, 138, 142. - mortipennella, n. sp., 137. plumifrontella, 137, 138, 143. Popeanella, 138, 143. Anarsia, 65, 66. ‘* ~ obliqui-strigella, n. sp , 63, 175. pruniella, 208. Ancylochira fasciata, 37. ANDREWs, W. V., articles by, 78, 140, 180. A new Departure, 119. ANNUAL ADDREss, 210. ANNUAL Report, 24, 240. Anobium foveatum, 151. Authribus fasciatus, 178. Anthocaris genutia, 74. Apate bivittata, 152. “domestica, 152. ¥ limbata, 152. rufitarsis, 152. rufipennis, 152. nigriceps, 153. brevicornis, 153. ee Apatura celtis. 75. “* elyton, 75. Apuipes, Geographica’ Distribution of, 97. Apotomus ovatus, 178, APPROPRIATIONS, Entomological in the U. States, 58. Argynnis, 46. s aphrodite, 238. atlantis, 203. bellona, 163. chariclea, 2035. cybele, 238. ‘* “notes on, 121. idalia, 75. Asemum moestum, 56. Attacus polyphemus, 36. Attelabus bipustulatus, 178. * Me notes on, 143. enreulionides, 177. similis, 177. B “ec ae Se. ee oe se ae | Balaninus, 38, 39. +. rectus, 19. Begoe gen. nov., 209. “< costulutella, n. sp., 209. Bett, Pror. J. J., Articles by, 155, 199. Beruune, Rev. C. J. S., Articles by, 1, 31, 52, 93, 111, 141, 151, 156, 158, 175, 181, 196, 210, 231. Briiincs, B.. Death of, 70. BLISTERING BEETLES, 139. Boox Notices, 77, 99, 158, 235. Bow es, J. G., Articles by, 102. Brachys aeruginosa, 124. re ovata, 36. Brenthis, 46- Buprestis appendiculata, 34. + bilineatus, 35. divaricata, 31, 32. Drummondii, 33. proxima, 33. tenebrica, 32. tenebrosa, 31, 32. trinervia, 32. umbellatorum, 3+. Burrerriies American, on Scudder’s Re- vision of, 214. BUTTERFLIES, @ Plague of, 240. i Embryonic Larvae of, 45. 2 Calandra pertinax, 154. Callidium agreste, 55. ss aulicum, 94. cinnamopterum, 94. collare, 56. ce “ec 242 Callidium dimidiatum, 93. palliatus, 93. proteus, 55, 93. rusticum, 55, 50. simile, 93. striatum, 56. sid triste, 94. Callidryas eubule, 74. Calosoma scrutator, 120. Calyptus, major, n. sp., ee 228. rotundiceps, 2. Sp., tibiator, n. sp,, 229. mexicanus, n. sp., 229. CATERPILLARS in Belgium, 64. CatocaLa, List of North American spe- cies, 164. CAULFIELD, F. B., Articles by, 98. Chalcophora virginiensis, 37, CuaMBERS, V. T., Articles by, 7, 25, 41, 65, 88, 106, 123, 126, 146, 169, 191, 206, 221, Chionobas—?, 204. Chlamys plicata, 196. Chrysebothris, 33. femorata, 37, "124. Chrysomela Bigsbyana, ‘232. clivicollis, 252. “ confinis, 231, ‘L. multipunctata, 232. philadelphica, 197. rufipes, 233 scalaris, 38. spiraeae, 252. Chrysophani, 47. Cirrha gen. nov., 146. “* platanella, n. sp., 146. Cirrhophanus triangulifer, n. sp., 187. Cis micans, 151, CLEMENTI, V., Articles by, 36. Cleonis vittatus, 155. Clisiocampa americana, 134. sylvatica, 134, 199. Clytus fuscus, 95. longipes. 95. lunulatus, 95. muricatulus, 96. speciosus, 37. “« undaytus, 94. undulatus, 94, COLEOPTERA, List of, 12. on some leaf mining, 123, 8 taken at Grimsby, 98. Colias, 48 ss philodice, 74, ‘* interior, 179, 202. Collecting Tour in Labrador, 39, 59, Conchylis Robinsonana, n. sp., 101. 5 maculana, 101, Copiophora mucronata, n. sp., 16. Coriscium, 7. s albinatella, 25. Corydalis cornutus, 38. CouPEer, Wo., Articles by, 39, 59, 201. Couper’s Labrador Tour, 179. 228. oe “ce ae “ce ce } INDEX TO VOLUME ‘IV. Cowcatcher, Ride on a, 14. CRAMBID4, 157. Cresson, E. T., Articles by, 21, 61, 81, 226. : Criocephalus agrest's, 56. Crort, Pror. H. H., Articles by, 119. Cryptocephalus notatus, 196. pubescens, 196. ie sellatus, 197. ¢ Cryptolechia, 92. D Danais archippus, 74, 85, 199. Debis portlandia, 75. Deilephila galii, 205, chaemanerii, 206. Dendroctonus rufipennis, 153. Depressaria, 67, 88, 90, 91, 126, 129, 146, © 169. # albipunctella, 169. albisparsella, n. sp., 92, 128,146. cs Aplana, 91. atrodorsella, 91. bicostomacu/ella, n. sp., 127, 128, 129, 147, 206. “ himaculella, n. sp., 108, 129,147. : hbistrigella, n. sp., 92, 128, 147. cercerisella, n, sp., 108, 129, 132, 147. $f cinereocostella, 91. ee cryptolechiella, n. sp., 90, 91, 129, 147. dubitella, n. sp., 90, 91, 92, 128, 14 Z° fuscoluteella,n. sp., 106, 129,147. fusco-ochrelia, n. sp., 106, 147. es Lecontella, 146, E a Ontariella, 91. we obscurusella, n. sp., 106, 128, 129, 147. “% pallidochrella, n. sp., 126, 129, 147. ce Lo imide ns eps, ‘OF BOL 129 s pulvipennella, 91, ef querciella, n. sp., 127, 147, 207. < Rileyella, n. sp., 106, 129, 147. € robiniella, 91, 107. umbellana, 91. EF versicolorella, n. sp., 127, 129, 147 DERMAPTERA (Orthoptera) List of, 30. Desmocerus cyaneus, 120. Diabrotica vittata, 37. Diapheroma femorata, 200. Dicerca, 31, 32. sf lurida, 38, DonceE Cuas. R., Article by, 14. Dopneg, G. M., Articles by, 198, 217. Doryphora 10 iineata, 37, 200 E EDITORIAL, 1. ; Epwarps, W. H., Articles by, 238. INDEX TO VOLUME IV. 243 Egeria exitiosa, 133. ENTOMOLOGY, American Illustrations of, 235. ENTOMOLOGICAL Society of Ontario, 141. Annual Meeting of, 187. ENTOMOLOGICAL Loss, 179. Epicauta vittata, 139. Errata, 69, 150. Error Corrected, 198. Eubadizon americanus, n. sp., 230. = latera is, n. sp., 229. maculiventris, n. sp., pleuralis, n. sp., 230. Enudamus tityrus, 75, 86. Eulophus, 28. . gracillariae, Eumolphus vitis, 197. “é 999, se _Euphorus mellipes, n sp., 227. scitulus, n. sp., 227. he sculptus, n EDs ited. Euphyes metacomet, 150. Euptoieta claudia, 75, 85. Euptychia areolata, 74. Euspilapteryx, 7. Evagora dificilisella, n. sp., F Female decoys, 138. Feniseca tarquinius, 76, 85. G Gelechia, 65, 66, 69, 88, 90, 125, 147, 169. aderucella, 125. aequepulvella, n. sp., 192, 193. albistrigella, n. sp., 171. apicistrigella, 175. anthyllidella, 69. aurimaculella, n. sp., 172. badiomaculella, n. sp., 192. continuella, 126, curvilineella, n. sp., 172. difficilisella, 192. discomaculella, n. sp., 172. disco-ocella, n. sp., 194. fuscomaculella, n. sp., 170. Ffuscopulvella, n. ep., 170. glandulella, 18, 65. grisella, n. sp., 171. Hermonnella, 67, 148, 169, 173. Labradorica, 125: ligulella, 125. longifasciella, 174. mimella, 69. obliquistrigella, 175 obscurella, n. sp., 170. palpiannulella, nN. sp., 68. Physaliella, n. sp., 173. quercinigracella, n. sp., 170. querciverella, n. sp., 173. quingueannulella, n. sp., 191. elie 69, 148, 169, 174, 65 192. | ; Hargium lineatum, 96. HEMIPTERA, 157. bee Heteroptera, List of, 29. HERIBEIA, 43. Gelechia, rubensella, spn. ., 193. rubideila, 193. similiella, n. sp., 193. suffusella, n. sp., 171. tephriasella, n. sp., 63. thoraceochrella, n. sp., 169, 170. variiella, 174. vorticella, 125. Gnorimus maculosus, 119. Gooseberry F ruit Ww orm, 154. Gracillaria, 7 4, Sarees albinatella, n. sp., 25. desmodifoliella, 26. eupatoriella, n. sp., 9. = gradatella, 26. juglandiella, 1 n. sp., 25, 88. juglandisnigrella, n. sp., 38. Kollariella. 26. lespedezaefoliella, 7 ononidis, 11. Packardella, n. sp., 27. pavoniella, 9, 11. plantaginicella,n. sp., 10. purpuriella, n. sp., 27, 29. robiniella, 7, 8, 9. salicifoliella, n. sp., 8, 25. 12 lineella vn. sp., 11. violacella, 26. Graphisurus pusillus, 55. Grapta, 46, 47. ** -fannus, 10, progne, 204. Grote, Ava. R., Articles by, 69, 101, 125, 136, 164, 187, 214, 220. H ee “se Hadrobregmus foveatus, 151. Hagno gen. nov., 129, 191. ‘« eryptolechiella, 131, 152. Faginella, n. sp.,131. Haltica, 36. puncticellis, 235. vicina, 234. _ incertella, n. sp., 44 HESPERIDZ, 48. Hesperia, ona new Checkered, 69. Hesperian, a new, 217. Hesperia acanootus, 150. bathyllus, 76, 86. communis, 290, delaware, 76. illinois, n. sp., 217. mandans, 205 numitor, 77. paniscus, 205. phyleus, 76. Powesheik, 218. sassacus, 77. De 244 Hesperia samoset, 76 S86. tessellata, 76, 86. textor, 76. verna, 76. vialis, 76. vitellius, 76. zabulon, 76. Hryts to Fruit Growers, 133. Hipparcuia, 46. Hispa inaequalis, 125. quadrata,_ 125. Holcocera, 38, 55. chaicofrontella, 65. glandulella, n. sp., 18, 65. Horn, Dr. Gzo. H., 200. Howarp, Wo. R., Article by, 219. Hylobius confusus, 154. Hylurgus rufipennis, 153. HYMENOPTERA, Descriptions of N. A., 21, 61, 81, 226. Hyperchiria varia, 160. Hypercompa Lecontei, 37. Hyponomeuta, 44, evonymella, 1. SS. lengimaculella, n. sp., 43. multipunctella, 42. orbimaculella, n. sp., 88. I Ichneutes abdominalis, 230. ‘s bicolor, n. sp., 230. Fulvipes, n. sp., 231. Janadian, Geographical Distribu- of, 184 notes on some genera 9 sp., 42, 43, ” 3”? of, 209, 236. ‘ Insect Collections, Prizes for, 159, INSEcTS in Pennsylvania, 140, K Kincston Branch, 78. KIRBY’S Insects of British North Am- erica, 31, 52, 93, 111, 151, 175, 196, 230. ib; Leconte, Dr. Joun L., 200. Leiophron laevis, n. sp., 228. Lema trilineata, 37. LEPIDOPTERA, Descriptions of, from Ala- bama, 101. Collected at Fox Bay, Anti- costi, &e., 201. Lepidophorug, 176. lineaticol'is, 177. ” Leptura, ata tt be argentata, 116. brevis, 114, canadensis, 113. chrysocoma, 112. erythroptera, 113. 3 3? 2 INDEX TO VOLUME IV. | Leptura, gulosa, 115. longiceps, 118. longicornis. 116. proteus, 116, quadrifasciata, 114 if semivittata, 115 116. sexmaculata, 114. similis, 116. subargentata, 116. subpubescens, 112. tenuior, 113. vagans, 114, ie vittata, 115. Lephyrus arcticus, 155. ie colon, 154, gemellus, 155, Lerema accius, 76. Leucania unipuncta, 23. Leucanthiza, 124. Libythea bachmannii, 75, 180, 239. # motya, 180, 259. Limenitis, 46. 3 arthemis, 37. misippus, 74, 85. Description of a Re- markable Variety of, 216. oe ursula, 75, 85, 217. Limochores bimacula, notes on, 150. Lithocolletis (epiWss guttifinitella, 124. + ornatella, 9, 107. =f robiniella, 9, 107. ~~ tubiferella, 123, 124. Lonpon BrancuH, Meetings of, 57, 77. LopnHonotts, 43, Lyca{NID#, 47. Lycena— anaes 204, 205. agriclus, 87. comyntas, 87. lucia, 205, lygdamus, 204: # Scudderi, 205. M Macaria liturata, 160. Macovwn, Prof., 157. Macrobasis Fabricii, 139. Macrops, 175. maculicollis, 176. * _-viticollis, 176. a Melanophila, 34. longipes, 35. Melitaea 47. ? Harrisii, 198, 237. » "Notes on the Larva of, 161. ismeria, 85, ~ tharos, 75, 203. MemBers, Notice to, 58. Mesochorus atriventris, n. sp., 21. & agilis, N. Sp. 22. americanus, 2. 8p., 23. basalis, n. sp., 22. ” ”» ” 4s INDEX TO VOLUME IV. 2 pi Mesochorus, luteipes, n. sp. 22. og melleus, n. sp., 24. - obliquus, n. sp.. 24. ii scitulus, nr. sp..23 24, 62. “ totonacus, n. sp.. 23. vs vitreus, N. sp., 23. Metonius laevigatus, 124. Mexican Honey Ant, 120. MIcROGASTER, 62. Micro fepidoptera, 7, 25, 41, 65, 126, 146, 169, 191, 206, 221. Microctonus ayilis, n. sp., 226. Minor, C. 58, Articl.s by, 150, 160. Miscellane us Notes, 19, 36, 58, 78, 97, 119, | 138, 159, 179, 198, 218 237. Monohammus confus»r 54, ad macmorator, 55 98, be notatus, 54, ES resuter, 54, af scutellatus, 54. Fy titillator, 54. Moths at S:a. 160. Mounxtrepr, Mary H., Article by, 143. N Nema‘ ocampa expunctaria n. sp., 101, wd filamentaria, 101. Nisoniades brizo, 76, 86. 4 catullus, 76, 86. juvenalis, 76, 86. 4 martialis, 76, 86. Notes and Queries, 119. Nysius raphanus, n. sp., 219. O Oxsrruary 70, 118. Odontomus proxima, 33, “i triuervia, 32, 33. Ornix, 8. Orthoptera, 14, 20, 30. vis Notes on new, 16. BS Lis. of, 30. Orthosom. cylindiicum Str:dula iens of, 139. Osmia canadensis, 237. OsTEN SACKEN, Baron, 156. Oxypteris appendicula‘a, 34 P Pachyrhynchus Schonherri, 177. Pa: hybrachis puiescens, 196, Pachyta iturata, 111. PackaxD A.S8., jr., 200. Papiiionidae, 47, 48. Papilio aste. ias, 37, 74, 85, 202. vo WeRaAX, 114; Ooe ‘¢ brevicauda, 2: 2. ** ~~ glaucus, 74, 85. ** philenor, 74. ** « polyxenes, 202, aa Cnlus, 202) a trollur, 74, 85. luines, 3,. 84, 88, 1€6, | Parasia, 65, 88. a apicistrigella, n. sp., 65, 175. griseaclla, n. sp., 88. Parectopa 7. 10. < lespedezaefoliella, 7, 8, 9. ot robiniella 7, 8. Peacu Borer, 133. Pelidnota punetata, 119. PERSONAL, 156, 200. Per Wasp, Sir John Lubboc'.’s, 239, Pe 111, J., Articles by, 3, 12, 9. Pwrilitus, 81. i commun’s, nN. sp., 82, 83. Ps dimvtiatus, n. sp., 83, 84. ee humilis, n. sp., 84. “ intermedius, n. sp., 82, 83. i niveitarsis, n. sp., 81, 82. “t pailita: sis, n sp., $1, 82. a7 proximus, n. sp., 83. vulgaris, n. sp., 83. Pezomachus alte: natus, n. sp., 64. oS canadensis, n sp., 62, 63. - compactus, n. sp., 63. 4 , dimidiatus n. sp., 63, G4. se gentilis n. sp., 61. te gracilis, n. sp., 63, 64. a mace, n. sp., 64. = meabilis, n. sp., 62. ve minimus, 62. " obscurus n. sp., 62. 5 Pettitii, n. sp., 61. 62. fs tantil us, nv. sp., 62. vs Texanus, n. sp., 64. unicolor, n. sp., 64. Phaedon Adonidis 233. pe Raphani,”33. 3 polyzoni, 254. Photinus corrusca. 36. Phycor-des tharos, 2'’3. | Phyilud cta vitellinae, 234, Phylloxera vastatrix in Portugal, 167. Phymatodes proteus, 93. Pieris 48, “* fiigida 202. ‘* metra, 104. novang! a, n. sp., 79, 103. oleracea, 103 * protodice 74, 240. “_ rapae, 98, 2:3. = *< Notes on, 102. oe * on a variety unknown < Europe, 79, vernalis, 240. Plusia gamma, 160. Polygraphus rufi; enuis, 152. PoLyHisTor, 38. Polyommatus anericanus, 37, 75. Prionus coriarius, 140. ** imbricornis, 140. obliquicornis, 14", Prowuba Yuceasella, 182. Pyr>meis, 46. SS atalanta, 204. aN cardui, 2: 4. oS huntera, 75, 85, ee in INDEX TO Pytho americanus, 53. depressus, 53. niger, 53. Rap:sH Bug, the, 219. Reep, E. B., Articles by, 119, 159, 240. REporT, Entom» logical, 59, 92, 105. Rhbagium lineatum, 96. Rhinaria Schonherri, an 7: RILEY, PROF. CNG ee icles by, 18, 19, 38, 139, 218. RoBINson, CoLeMas T., Death of, 118. ” List of W ritings ae of, 109. Rocers R. V., Articles by, 78, 119, 138, 199, 200. S Sagaritus gen. nev., 225. eracilella, 226. Satyrus, 45, 46. =“ alupe- 74. = eurytris, 74. Saunpers, W.. Articles by, 36, 49, 57. 58, 77. 121,133, 139.161, 179, 235, 237, 240. ScuppEr, S. H., Artic es by, 20, 45, 73, 79, 84. Sesia ruficautlis. 205. Sex, Determination of, 78. Simulia molesta, 37. Smerinthus modestus, 36. Spectrum femoratum, 200. Sp: senophorus pertivax, 154. Stenuris divaricata, 31, 32. = tenebrosa 31, 32. Stranzalia fugax, 114. 3 luteicornis, 119. sex-maculata, 115. Strobisia, 88, 91 = aphroditeella, n. sp., 88. ae emblemelia, 88, 89, 90. =- iridip-nnella, 88, 89. i venustella, n. sp., 90. Syricthus communis, 69. 43 Telphusa gen. nov., 132. a curvistrigella 133. 174. TENT CATERPILL RS, 134, 199. Terias lisa, 74, ** nicippe. 74 85. Tetropiu p, 93. cinnamopterum, 94. se VOLUME IV. | } ee Thecla, 47. calanus, 75, 86. ‘© humuli, 86. tof) STi ae. ‘* mopsus, 75. niphon, 75, oo strigosa, 75, 86. THOMAS, Pror. C., Article by, 16. Thymele proteus, 76. Thyreus nessus, 37. Tomicus pini, 151. Trachypteris Drummondii, 33. umbellatarum, 34. Trachyphloeus melanothrix, 177. Trachys acuducta, 52. Re aurulenta, 35. pygmaea, 124. Trichius Bigsbii, 119. Trogosita americana, 53. = caraboides, 54. Typocerus fuzax, 119. V sé s < Vanessa. 46. es antiopa, « 37, 75, 85, 204, 218, 719 * coenia, 75, "85 ‘< milberti, 36. Venilia gen. nov., 207. ne albapalpelia, n. sp., 208. W WALKER, FRANCIS, Articles by, 29, 98, 184, 209, 236 WueEatT Wine Worm, 3. x Xyleutes robiniae, 37. Xyloterus bivittata, 152. bf Ypsolophus, 207, 209. caryefoliella, n. sp., 224. 33 contuberualellus, 223. eupatoriella, n. sp., 221. flavivitellus, 223. ss pom+tellus "999. fe punctiaiscellus, 225. ey querciella, 223, 224. ey quer cipominella, Nn. $P., 222, 223. “ Reedelia, n. sp., 222. a Straminiella, n. sp., 224. Z Zoo.Locicau parallelism, 155. i i ~rt aan eR RUS ages 2 eS THE CANADIAN Hw 2 OMOLOGIS TY, EE VOLUME V. 2% Edited bp the Mev. C. J. S. Bethune, M. A,, Head Master of Trinity College School, Port Hope, Ont. ASSISTER BY WM. SAUNDERS, London, Ont. : | E. B. REED, Barrister-at-Law, London, Ont and J. M. DENTON, London, Ont. LONDON : PRINTED BY THE FREE PRESS STEAM PRINTING COMPANY, RICHMOND ST 1873 LIST OF CONTRIBUTERS TO THIS VOLUME. eR pyre Wren Y ewe ates, wo dina. viel e"s avis Siets we os New York. Ripa he SAA fe Dee eg ne Kelas sss edhe ws WATERBURY, CONN. (EO 1 OY eo Oe Oe Pca oO eee BELLEVILLE, ONT. BETHUNE, REV. C. J.S., The Editor........Port Hope, Onr. SO AS pk C0 ee a MontTREAL, P. Q. BME eeu Res Valet rs o's sexta cto eae eee wd EAS CoviINGTon, Ky. MME Sg’ NV IVE Rend ogi foy h biel'ss bay «wa She melas Ofek as MontTrEAL, P. Q. TS STORRS De a |S ie eee eo Pee PHILADELPHIA, Pa, a OWI OE FR tic Shei sae: o Sixth dk onc wapwib ao Ries Ou1o, Itt. RENNER NN Elian Birt. Stes evans ae aws rae CoALBuRGH, W. Va. eae ee PET UIS INK. oy ke anak eae we Chala eens eats GERMANTOWN, Pa, Su IR CRM: ge A a ca es BurFFALo, N. Y. MIME AIUD PrN s, st na este eo hts, pah ae he ee ee eed ALBANY, N. Y. PIC IC: LoS ge wane, ok Swe ks os New York. SS RS Aaa MALDEN, Mass. oo SS UNS S ORG 0 aa ae oe ca CAMBRIDGE, Mass. RemenmMNe TAOMECS Co cM aie ag cts aig Rte bi t'e nna o dipteieve Sr. Louis, Mo. Ne creer bls Six sees Ot coded gees oe Whe Yi KINGSTON, ONT. HSS. icles 0 tle War al oe owe ok bae Lonpon, ONT. MNO ae EAT Os cht bls a oo ated Soe ESE Boston, Mass. REMUS, S. Veg cy tes os pe cases ete gene ean NEW ORLEANS, LA. MME IER a Cs Gee oe co Sic. ethan cele uk BALTIMORE, Mp, Seiten, FRANCIS: 2c eee e cc ce es Fpwaawrs LonpDoNn, ENG. EE Sa i Bam tates ve ae sea A LONDON: ONT: # - » we i; wee. “ ‘ é "A . > : : : - . : a * bs : - ys c : d * Ki € , < - 7 += - = i i - 5 in Sire - ae é? pia ’ : ‘ ee = r - i. a- =a% “ . ed = . pa 2s ¢ . * : - i 247 sf + . } - } + hs a5 - = 4 = e ~ P A “ . tne - { we ; ~~ " reg me = vi > ~ J q > . . a A s 4 = uy - a E yt 7 . - ‘ ¢ « > ' | a * ¢ . 5 ey = <% - > - ‘ - . 5 s : ’ as - - ‘ ‘ - ’ * ' bd yuk e a & ve = Ps - re . ’ ‘ acte 7 . . = ‘ —_ - jf AM F. =! > Che Canadian Entomolonst. a ~ VOL. V. LONDON, ONT., JANUARY, 1873. No. 1 PSs (3.7 It has been our custom at the commencement of a new volume to offer our hearty greetings to our friends and correspondents, to all who read the CANADIAN ENToOMOLOGIST,—to all, indeed, who take a kindly interest in the success of our journal and the welfare of our Society. This year we do so most cordially, with not a little pardonable pride, when we remember that it is for the 7/¢h time. Four years and a half have elapsed since we ventured to put forth our diminutive first number that consisted merely of eight pages ; with our last December number we completed our fourth volume and eight-hundredth page of Entomological matter ! A complaint has once or twice reached us iately to the effect that our publication was gradually becoming too technical, and consequently of decreasing interest to a large number of our readers, who, from various causes, are unable to become deep students of the science, but who take _ great delight in learning all they can respecting the economy and classifi- cation of the insects of the country. We must confess that the complaint is not unfounded, and that we have almost unconsciously drifted some- what away from the design of the periodical. It has always been our intention and desire to meet the requirements, if possible, of two classes of readers—those, on the one hand, who are leaders in the pursuit of Entomology, and who, therefore wish to have presented to them in convenient form all discoveries of new species and other valuable scientific information that may from time to time be acquired by their fellows,—and those, on the other hand, who collect and study insects to some extent, but are not yet far advanced in the pursuit ; or who merely regard insects as destructive or beneficial and therefore wish to know something about them ; or, again, who take pleasure in learning all they can about these creatures without either collecting or specially studyigg them. To meet the particular requirements of all these various descriptions of readers would, of course, be a perfect impossibility in a periodical of such limited size as ours ; at the same time we think that i) THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. something may be done for all who care for insects, without filling out pages too much with technicalities, and without losing sight of all additions to our knowledge by becoming simply “ popular.” To steer a suitable course between the Scylla of abstruse science on the one side, and the Charybdis of mere ‘‘ popularity” on the other, is no easy task, and we fear has not yet been achieved by us. We hope, however, in the forthcoming volume to do a little better in this respect, and we look forward to a continuance of friendly aid from our correspondents in © various quarters to enable us to overcome the difficulty. As a first step towards improvement we propose to present to our readers a series of illustrated papers on the common Butterflies of North America—with special reference to those found in Canada. We hope that we shall thus be enabled in time to furnish beginners in Entomology with a hand book that will enable them easily to identify any common butterfly and to ascertain where and when it may be found, what its larva feeds upon, and such other useful information as may be gathered into a short space. Owing to the difficulty there is in obtaining really satisfactory wood cuts of insects, and the time that is required for their production, we shall not be able to take up the different species of Butterflies in any systematic order, but only as we are able to obtain the necessary materials. We shall be very thankful, indeed, for assistance from our readers in this department ; almost every one can help us with lists of species observed in his own neighborhood, or with notes on their time of appearance and disappear- ance, number of broods, larval habits, etc., etc. The “Hints to Fruit Growers” that have been afforded by one of our Editorial Staff—Mr. Saunders—will be continued with greater frequency during the coming year; we are glad to learn from various sources that those already published have proved of much value to our horticultural readers. As a further improvement, we should be pleased to receive corres- pondence from our readers upon general Entomological subjects of the day ; for instance, at the present moment, upon the vexed, and we may surely say vexatious, question of nomenclature. It will be a relief, no doubt, to the majority of our readers to learn that the reprint of Kirby’s Zzsects of the Northern Parts of British America is now fast approaching completion, and will cease ere long to distress them with its constant recurrence. The whole will, when finished, be made up into a separate volume and be sold at a moderate price, We have no doubt that it will prove of much value to those who are unable THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 3 to obtain the rare and expensive original. The space thus set free we propose to occupy with translations of Guenee’s Descriptions of Moths, and reprints of Drury and other old authors whose works can seldom be obtained by the student of the present day. During the past year we have received valued contributions to our pages from a larger number of correspondents than ever before ; while we beg to offer them, for ourselves and our readers, our very hearty thanks for their favors, we venture to express the hope that they will not relax in their investigations and contributions, and that many others also will feel ’ disposed to join their ranks. Without such assistance the CANADIAN -EnTomotocist would be but a sorry production, and could not long protract its existence. Another species of support, our worthy Treasurer reminds us, is equally necessary for the maintenance and well-being of our publication— need we say that he refers to the grosser element of dollars and cents? Our rules require the payment of all subscriptions in advance at the commencement of each year; as the amount to each individual is but a single dollar, there ought to be no difficulty or delay on his part in forwarding it ; the aggregate sum thus provided is, as all must be aware, a matter of great importance to us, especially as we do not receive the Legislative grant to the Society till about midsummer. The present number of the CaNADIAN Enromo_ocist will be sent to all subscribers on the list for 1872, who have not signified their desire to withdraw from membership with the Society ; no further number, however, will be sent, unless the amount of subscription is meanwhile received. Pay your honest dues, friendly reader, and then you will not fail to have in one respect at least, what we heartily Wish you in all respécts, A Happy NEw YEAR ! ANNUAL MEETING OF THE LONDON BRANCH. At the recent annual meeting of the London branch of the Entomo- logical Society of Ontario, the following officers were elected :—J. WILLIAMS, President; M. L. Morcan, Vice-President; H. P. Bock, Secretary-Treasurer ; F. OSBORNE, Curator. An interesting and satisfactory report was presented by the Secretary- Treasurer, showing an increase of membership, and also showing the funds of the branch to be in a prosperous condition. A THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ON SOME OF OUR COMMON INSECTS. PAPER NO. I. BY W. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONTARIO. This paper is the first of a series in which it is proposed, by members of the editorial staff alternately, to describe some of our more common insects, to illustrate them with suitable cuts, and to make the descriptions of so plain a character that the most unscientific reader may be able readily to comprehend their meaning. Since it is one of our aims in publishing the ENromoLocisT to popularize our favorite science, we shall offer no apology for introducing into our journal these readable papers, in which much material may from time to time appear, which, to the scientific reader, may look stale and uninviting. Ina recent letter from a correspondent who takes some interest in ‘ bugs,” but is not deeply versed in the technichalities of the science, he complains much of the depth of the learning which has been displayed in our pages during the past, and says that although he has frequently taken a plunge into the depths of the articles, one after another, that he has rarely been able to touch bottom. It will be our aim, then, while still devoting the larger portion of our pages to scientific matter, to introduce something into each future number in which subscribers of similar scientific calibre to the gentleman already referred to, may be able, not only to touch bottom, but to wander through the shallows with ease, and we hope with some degree of pleasure. The first insect of which we propose to treat is one of our commonest butterflies, known as the archippus butterfly (Danais archippus). This insect is said to hybernate during the winter; it is seen on the ‘wing usually as early as the middle of May, but itis not very common until later inthe season. These first few individuals lay their eggs on the leaves of the common milkweed (Asclepias cornuti)and other species of Asclepfias, also on the bitter root (Apocynum androsemifolium ), during the latter part of May or the beginning of June. The eggs, when fresh laid, are white, but in two or three days they become yellow and then dull gray just before the time of hatching. They are #sth of an inch long, conical in form, aa ee THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. d flattened at the base. When viewed with a magnifying glass they appear Fig. 1. very beautiful. See figure 1, where @ represents the egg much enlarged, while at ¢ it is shown of natural size and in its usual position on the un- derside of the leaf. On this egg there are about twenty- five raised lorigitudinal lines, and about the same number a 559 of cross lines between each, so that the whole appears covered with a regular and beautiful net work, as shown in the figure, which has been drawn from nature, as those also have which are to follow, by our esteemed friend, Prof. C. V. Riley, of St. Louis, Mo. In about six or seven days the egg matures, producing a minute caterpillar one tenth of an inch long, with a large black head, and yellow- ish-white body, with a few black hairs on each segment, as shown at ¢ and /, fig. 1. This larva grows very rapidly, and soon finds that its skin will bear no further stretching, when it conveniently disrobes itself and appears in garb gay and new by crawling out of its skin through a rent down the back, which takes place just at the proper time, which process is repeated three times during its growth. At 4, fig. 1, the head and anterior segments of the larva just before its last moult is figured for the purpose of showing how the long fleshy horns with which the mature caterpillar is furnished are conveniently coiled up when buried beneath the old skin. The full grown larva, fig. 2, is about one and three quarter inches long. Fig. 2. Its head is yellowish with a triangular black stripe in front below, and another of a similar shape above. The upper surface of the body is beau- tifully ornamented with transverse stripes of black, yellow and white, the white covering the greater part of each segment, and having a wide black 6 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. stripe down its centre, while the yellow occupies the spaces between. On the third segment (reckoning the head as first) are two long black fleshy horns, and on the twelfth two others of a similar character, but shorter and not quite so stout. The under side is black with a greenish flesh color between most of the segments. The next change which comes over this caterpillar is that which trans- forms it to a pupa or chrysalis, a most astonishing transformation, when the voracious larva becomes for a time torpid, senseless, and almost motionless while preparing for that change when it is to appear in brilliant plumage, and gracefully float and flutter through the air, enjoying the summer’s sunshine and sipping the nectar of flowers. Fig. 3 shows the larva as it appears at different periods during its transition to the state of chrysalis. Ata ‘it hangs suspended from a silken web, in which its hind legs are en- “tangled and which has been previously attached by the caterpillar to the underside of a leaf, or fence rail or some other secure place of retreat, and here while hanging for about a day the larva contracts its length, and increases its bulk, especially on the anterior segments. By and by a rent takes place in the skin down the back, and the chrysalis begins to appear, and after long and persevering efforts and much wriggling the skin is worked nearly up to the hinder extremity, as shown at 2. Nowa difficulty presents itself, and a feat is to be performed to imitate which would puzzle the most daring acrobat, for without hands or feet to hold on by it has to withdraw itself from the remnants of its larva skin, and hang itself up by a black protuberance covered with a bunch of hooks, with which the chrysalis is furnished. Perilous as this undertaking seems to be, it is very seldom indeed that a failure occurs in its accomplishment. A ready explanation of the means by which this is done is given at ¢ fig. 3. The joints of the abdomen being freely movable, are first stretched against a portion of the larva skin, when, by a sudden jerk backwards, the skin is grasped and firmly held while the terminal segments are withdrawn, and “I THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. the process of suspension completed. Soon after this the chrysalis begins a series of wriggling and jerking movements to dislodge the empty larva skin, after the removal of which it remains motionless, unless disturbed, and becomes gradually harder and more contracted until it assumes the appearance represented by fig. 4. The chrysalis is about an inch long, and of a beautiful bright green colour dotted with gold, and with a band of golden dots extending more than half way round the body above the middle ; this band-is shaded with black. There is a patch of black also arouud the base of the black protuberance by which it is suspended, and several dots of the same on other portions of the surface. The insect seldom remains in chrysalis more than ten or twelve days, and towards the latter end of this period, the hand- some green and gold colours begin to fade, the chrysalis growing gradually darker until the diminutive wings of the future butterfly show plainly through the semi-transparent enclosure. The escape of the imprisoned insect, now nearly ready for flight, is usually made quite early in the morning. We have several times watched for their deliverance, and have usually found it to take place soon after daybreak. A sudden crackling and slight tearing sound is heard, which arises from a splitting .of the chrysalis case part way down the back, the fore legs, head and antennae are first withdrawn, and in a few moments the entire insect is liberated. At first the wings are very small, and the new born butterfly seeks at once some suitable spot where the-wings may be held so as to hang down and thus facilitate the rapid growth which follows. This growth is truly ‘amazing ; we have seen the wings double their size within three minutes, and seldom more than fifteen or twenty minutes pass before they have attained their full dimensions, and, ere the sun is high in the heavens, the soft, flabby wings have dried and the butterfly is ready for flight. The archippus butterfly, fig. 5, is so well known that it needs but little description, especially when so good a figure is given. The ground colour of the wings, when fresh, is a béautifully bright orange red, the veins are heavy and black, and the margins are spotted with white, the latter being more or less covered or encroached upon by the general colour, Near the ‘middle of the hind wings there appears in the figure on one of the veins 8 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. an enlarged black streak or blotch ;_ this, when closely examined, is found Fig. 5. to be a small excrescence ; it is found only in the male, and by this peculiarity the sexes may be readily distinguished. We have frequently seen this butterfly in great numbers on pine trees which have been infested by apfis, attracted there no doubt by the sweet exudations which flow from the bodies of the apfis, thus interfering with the rights and privileges which have always been accorded to the indus- trious ant. They also have the fashion of congregating at times, late in the season, in prodigious swarms consisting of tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of individuals. In September, 1871, we met with a swarm of this character on the shore of Lake Erie. They hung in clusters everywhere on a group of trees which they completely covered ; as many as thirty-two individuals were counted on a space of the size of ones’ two hands, and their total numbers we thought might safely be estimated by millions. No satisfactory reason has yet been assigned for such gatherings. SOME REMARKS ON CHANGES. IN NAMES OF CERTAIN BUTTERFLIES. BY W. H. EDWARDS, COALBURGH, W. VA. ’ PAPILIO ASTERIAS. Now sought to be changed to Polyxenes, although from the time of Fabricius to the publication of Kirby’s Catalogue (1871), no other name than asferias has been in use. The species has been repeatedly figured as asferias in these hundred years, and under this name is well known to everyone who takes the least interest in these things. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. o What is gained by re-naming it, I am unable to see. ‘The first mention of polyxenes was in Fab. Syst. Ent., page 444, No. 10, 1775, the male being described. Fabricius in 1787, in Mant. Ins., gives the same species under the name of as/erias, referring to Drury, vol. i, plate ii, for the type, and quoting his own folyxenes as synonymous. PaPILIo GLAucUS. Under this name Linnzeus described the black female of furnus, and it is only within the last ten years that it has been generally known that g/aucus was related to furnus. When glaucus is now spoken of, it at once brings to mind this striking variety, and /urnus var. glaucus is a sufficient designation and answers every proper requirement. It is eminently convenient that this variety should have its own designa- tion, and by it, it is treated of in Wallace, Walsh, Darwin, Harris, and other authors. I hope our lepidopterists will not be deluded into changing these names by any supposed obligatory rule, for the simple fact is, there is no obligatory rule in the case. DaNals ARCHIPPUS. Mr. Kirby (1871) gives the name of this butterfly as erifpus Cramer. Scudder (1872) gives it as plexifpus Linn. Scudder in 1863 gave it as er?#pus Doubleday (But. N. England.) Mr. Scudder also read a paper by the late Dr. Harris before the Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. (1859) showing that these and other names were remarkably confounded, for example: “The derenice of Cramer is the eippus of Fabricius, but not of Cramer, and it is the gt/zppus of Smith, but not of Cramer and Fabricius; the evifpus of Cramer is the archippus of Fabri- cius and of Smith; it is also the same as the A/exippus of Cramer, but not of Linnzus and Fabricius: the mzsippus of Fabricius is the archippus ’ of Cramer, but not of Fabricius and Smith: the erippus of Cramer is not the erippus of Fabricius, and the mzsippus of Fabricius is not the misippus of Linneus.” And he givesatable ‘by which it will be seen that the nomenclature of the three North American species has become confounded with five others.” In preparing the Synopsis of Butterflies of N. Am., I had at hand all the above quoted works, and could make little of this tangle ; and as our northern species of Danas has been generally known and written of and figured as archifpus, I deemed it advisable to adhere to that name as one resting place in a foggy sea. It is so figured in Abbot & Smith, Boisduval & Leconte, and so called in Harris’ Ins. Mass. 2nd Edition, which work I believe had the assistance of Mr. Scudder in preparing for the press. - 10 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. LIMENITIS URSULA. Changed to astyanax by Butler, 1869, and followed by Kirby and Scudder. Fabricius’ Syst. Ent., 1775, named the species astyanax. In Ent. Syst., 1793, he re-named it wrsuda for the following reason: It then stood in the genus Pafilio, in which also stood another astyanax. He therefore changed the name of the first to ursula, and by this latter the species has come down to this day. It is so figured by Abbott & Smith, and by Boisduval & Leconte. That Fabricius was right in so changing the name to avoid a duplicate in the same genus, is undoubted, and although the species which still retains the name astyanax has since been found to be the female of something else, and hence loses its original name, there seems no good reason for disturbing wrsu/a. Fabri- cius was right in making the change, and once right always right in such a matter. Of course I do not allow or believe that proserpina is a variety of wrsula, it isas near arthemis as ursula in some respects. ON THE LARVA OF PLUSIA BALLUCA. BY W. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONT. In the second volume (1863,) of the Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, I published a paper on some of our Lepidopterous larve, and among other descriptions there appeared one purporting to be that of Plusia balluca. By some unfortunate mishap a description of the larva of V. ixterrogationis was sent in place of the intended one of balluca, and the mistake was not discovered until after the number had been issued, while all trace of the original description of the larva of balluca was lost. I did not again meet with this larva until the summer of 1871, when a fresh description was taken on the 15th of June, as follows :— Length, 1.20 in. ; body thickest on middle and posterior segments, taper- ing towards the tront; the body is arched or looped along the middle seg- ments when in motion. Head rather small, bilobed, of a shining green color, with a few whitish hairs. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Lak Body, above, yellowish-green, streaked and spotted with white, inter- mixed all through with green, thus dividing the white into a series of streaks, dots and broken lines; there is also a line of greenish-white on each side, close to the undersurface. Each segment hasa few tubercles of a green color, striped with white; these are small on the second, third and fourth segments, but much larger from fifth to twelfth, inclusive, and entirely wanting onthe terminal segment. On each of the hinder segments, with the exception of the last three, are ten or twelve of these tubercles, which almost cover the whole surface, and from each of the tubercles throughout there arises a single whitish hair. The under surface is of a deeper green than the upper, with a few short whitish hairs, chiefly on 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 11th and 12th segments. Feet green, prolegs, of which there are three pairs, green also. This larva became a chrysalis on the 18th of June, and produced the moth on the 13th of July. In the caterpillar state, the insect feeds on the hop, consuming the leaves, but we have never known it to occur in sufficient numbers to do much damage. The moth, (see fig. 6,) measures, when expanded, about 13% inches. A large portion of the upper surface of the fore-wings is covered with brilliant, metallic green scales, which are darker on the lower portion of the middle and on the tips of the wings, and much paler towards the inner angle. The wings are covered by two oblique, irregular brown lines, and parts of the upper and outer portions are tinged with purplish. The hind wings are of a brownish dusky grey, without markings. The anterior portion of the body is pale brown, marked with buff and curiously crested above, the hinder portions of the body are paler. The under surface of both front and hind wings is dull, varying in shade from pale buff to brown, one of the brown lines on the upper surface of fore- wings being reproduced and extended across the hind wings. Fig. 6. This moth has been found in various parts of Canada, but in no instance have we heard of its being met with in any considerable numbers. 12 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Vol. 4, Page 226, ERRATA ET CORRIGENDA.—Ante vol. 4, p. 148, for Hermonella read Hermanella ; p. 149, for Alexandriacella read Alexandriedla ; p. 173, line 11, for “there” read “then;” p. 195, line 5, for “all the veins are united near the end of the cell,” which is an unaccountable blunder, read ‘all the veins given off from the cell arise near its end.” ANESYCHIA. A. trifurcella, n. sp. White; palpi annulate and tipped with dark brown or black; a longitudinal median blackish stripe on the thorax, and a spot of the same hue on each side of it; primaries white with a median wide blackish longitudinal streak beginning on the costa at the base, gradually widening to the apex, where two small white streaks or spots divide it into three short branches. Sometimes these white spots completely separate the outer branches from the median one. A row of small dark brown dots around the apex ; a small spot near the dorsal margin about the basal fourth, and a larger one about the apical third of the wing. Antennae dark brown. which these butterflies visited was certainly that on which the pork water was thrown, and the effluvia resulting from this was doubtless the great source of attraction. In A. R. Wallace’s “ Malay Archipelago,” page 124, he says that the rare Charaxes Kadenii, a Java swallow-tail butterfly, was caught as it was sitting with wings erect sucking up the liquid from a muddy spot by the roadside, and I have seen several of our Canadian butterflies sucking the moisture from mud on the margins of ponds made for the use of cattle. I intend to try a few experiments in suitable places next sumer on Anticosti, &c., with water in which salt pork has been par-boiled, with various other substances added,and the results will be noted for the benefit of those concerned. Cyanide of Potassium is a quick destroyer of insect life, and I recommend it for night collecting. 20 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. As it is almost impossible to keep butterflies perfect on pins while moving from place to place in wild regions, each specimen of Diurnal Lepidoptera of my next collection will be placed in a paper envelope, and my subscribers will, no doubt, receive the remainder of their specimens in good condition. ° Moths will be pinned, and collected chiefly by sugaring, as I believe it is the cheapest and most prolific method of procuring good specimens. I am anxious to obtain three additional subscribers for the Northern Diurnal Lepidoptera, to be collected during the season of 1873.—WILLIAM CouPER, 38 Bonaventure Street, Montreal. QuerRiEs.—John R. Smith; of South Pownal, Vermont, U. S., wishes to ascertain the best locality for P. Zuna and Ceratocampa regalis ; also if there is any published price list of American insects. Will any of our readers kindly give the desired information ? A New Sociery.—We are glad to learn that a new Entomological Society has been started in Brooklyn, N. Y. We cordially wish it every success. ExcHANGE.—Mr. W. Cole, of London, Eng., is desirous to enter into correspondence with Canadian Entomologists with a view of effecting exchange of specimens. For further information address W. CoLE, care of C. Browne, Esq., 5, Old Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London, England. ADVERTISEMENTS. The undersigned would like to exchange desirable Lepidoptera from North America, Brazil, India, Europe, &c., for species of Lycenide, new to him (from any part of the world.) Californian and Arctic species especially wanted. Address H. R. Morrison, Old Cambridge, Mass., US. Joun AkuHurRsT, Taxidermist, No. 19, Prospect Street, Brooklyn, N. Y., keeps constantly on hand for sale, Sheet Cork for insect boxes—size, 12 x 3% x 4%; $1.25 per dozen sheets. Felt or German Insect Paper— size, 18 x 22 x %; 50c. per sheet. Insect pins, French make ; No. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 14, 16, 18—$1.25 per tooo. Insects for sale or exchange. Dealer in Bird Skins. N. B.—The above prices do not include the cost of transportation. Che Canadian Entomologist. VOL. V. LONDON, ONT., FEBRUARY, 1873. No. 2 SOME REMARKS ON ENTOMOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. BY W. H. EDWARDS, COALBURGH, W. VA. The papers on Nomenclature, lately published in the CaNaDIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, have much interested me, and doubtless many others, and as the subject is one that just now, for reasons well known, appeals especially to Lepidopterists, I beg to be allowed a little of your space to give my views thereupon, and to state what I believe is a practicable remedy for the evils complained of. I am glad that this matter of Nomenclature was brought so prominently forward by the Entomologists present at the Meeting of the American Association for 1872, and that a Committee was appointed by the Entomological section to report a series of Rules for consideration at the next Meeting. I apprehend that hitherto very little attention has been paid to Nomen- clature in this country, at any rate in Entomology, and that when start- ling innovations are proposed, based upon assumed Codes or systems of Rules, very few know what such Codes or Rules are, or how far they are applicable or binding, or how they came to be enacted, with many other points of like nature. As applied, they seem incomprehensible to most persons, and even to the initiated have their difficulties. In the words of Alex. Agassiz, “'The laws requisite for the correct name of an animal or of a plant have become as difficult to establish as the most intricate legal question.” How such a discreditable state of things has come about, it is worth while to consider. From an early period, Entomology, quite as much as its kindred Sciences, suffered from a disagreement as to names of species, one set prevailing in England, another in France, another in Germany, and so on. The first effort to secure uniformity seems to have been made in England by the Rev. Mr. Strickland, who, after consultation with other naturalists, drew up a Code of Nomenclature for Zoologists, that was bo Le THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. adopted by the British Association, in 1842. (I have been unable to: obtain a copy of this Code, and only know its Rules as I have found them recited in various authors. On applying to Mr. A. G. Butler,, Brit. Mus., I received the following reply:—“ I can get no exact informa- tion as to when and where these Rules were published. At the time, they appeared in the report on the Meeting, and separate copies were: struck off and distributed. | Most of our Entomologists have either made- copies of them or have seen them, and a few say they have printed copies somewhere.” This Code was not found to work altogether satisfactorily, and never did receive the general assent of Naturalists in their several departments. Prof. Verrill says, ‘‘ The success of these Rules was but partial, even in England, for a considerable number of English authors have either ignored them or adopted them in part, often violating the most obvious and im-. portant Rules. In Conchology, especially, the violations have been lamentably numerous.” In 1865, a Revised Code was adopted by the British Association, which Code is printed at length in the Am. Journal of Arts and Science, July 1869, with valuable notes by Prof. Verrill. In this Revision some: important changes were made, with a view to curing the defects of the original Code, and of gaining a more general acceptance. It is significant that Botany is recommended, by the Committee of Revision, to be omitted from the operations of the Code. These two Codes may, so faras my purpose is concerned, be treated as one and the same, as the Rules that I consider obnoxious are found in both of them, and it is of their application to Entomology only that I have to speak, and more especially as affects the Lepidoptera. The first Rule reads as follows :—-‘‘ The name originally given by the describer of a species should be permanently retained, to the exclusion of all subsequent synonyms.” It is declared by those who are familiar with the facts, that the object. of this Rule was not to drop out of sight all existing names in favor of a rejected or obsolete name, but to give the right to that one of the names in use that should be found to have priority of date. For a period of years after 1842, it is asserted that such was the under- stood effect of the Rule, until a generation arose who knew nothing of, or overlooked the circumstances connected with its original proposal, and who took the letter of the Rule as their guide. And gradually there has THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 23 sprung up a class of authors who’have devoted themselves with enthusiasm to exploring ancient works and forgotten publications of all sorts, in the hunt for the earliest recorded name to every species, by which to replace the name or names in use. ‘The old authors had described but a few hundred species, and their descriptions were of the briefest. | How brief, an average example from Linnzus will show :—“ Papilio Troilus ; wings tailed, black ; fore-wings with pale marginal spots, hind wings. beneath, with fulvous spots;” a description applicable, perhaps, to fifty species of Papilio. (This description at once misled Drury into giving the name Troilus to his figure of Asterias, to which it applies equally well.) As new species were discovered, each of the earlier described having a group of close allies, many of these descriptions were no longer capable of identification, applying to numerous species as well as one. Then recourse was had to tradition, or to type specimens. The former may, or may not be trustworthy, and the latter is utterly untrustworthy unless the type agrees with the description. Dr. Staudinger says:—“ It is unfortu- nately a fact that the acquirer of the Linnzan collection had the deplora- ble idea of sometimes replacing damaged specimens by fresh.” Mr. McLachlan says :—‘‘ It (this Linnzan collection,) was so mal- treated by additions, destructions and misplacements of labels, as to render it a matter of regret that it now exists at all. Any evidence it now furnishes is only trustworthy when confirmed by the descriptions.” Speaking of quite a modern collection, that of Mr. J. F. Stephens, Mr. Janson says :—“It not unfrequently happens that two, or in difficult genera, more species are mixed up under the same specific title.” And it is my opinion, knowing well the carelessness of collectors in the matter of labelling, some even who have described many species using no labels at all, but trusting to memory for identification of all their speci- mens, that a type specimen, or what was offered as such, if it disagreed essentially with the description, should be wholly rejected. Besides the brevity of the old descriptions, many are defective from other causes. Often the two sexes received different names; often varieties were described as species ; often damaged and broken specimens were described as if fresh, the defects being cured by imagination ; often figures were made by unskilled artists, who omitted the specific charac- teristics, or the figures were colored so poorly as to be incapable of identification, or were copies from copies, or copies from memory, (for a curious illustration of this last, see Westwood, Trans. Lond. Ent. Soc. 24 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 1872, on Donovan’s Papilios) ; and often descriptions were made from unreliable figures, instead of from the insect. Now, with these and other disadvantages that might be mentioned, the authors who have undertaken to revise our Nomenclature have, each for himself, fixed on this or that description as applying to this or that insect, and there is frequent and serious disagreement between them. This will sufficiently appear by comparing the two Catalogues hereinafter mentioned, which, as to the names of British butterflies alone, that one might suppose had been settled long ago, differ as to the correct specific name to the extent of one-seventh of the whole number, as has been stated by Mr. W. A. Lewis, in his paper on Synonymic Lists. Lond. 1872.* To complicate the case still further, there is a disagreement as to the date at which names shall be held to have first begun. Specific names did not originate with Linnzus, but that naturalist was the author of the binomial system of Nomenclature, and enunciated it in 1751. ‘This was after his earlier works had been published, and even he did not fully apply the system till several years later. | He re-described the known species of insects, using sometimes the names of his predecessors, but often re- naming, and very frequently changed a name given by himself in his earlier editions. The question of a starting point, therefore, has very much exercised authors exploring for ancient names. And it isa very important one, and one above all others on which agreement would seem to be necessary, for many insects in 1767 bore different names from those given to them in 1758, and the latter from those of prior date. Rule 2nd of the Code says:—“ Specific names published before 1766, cannot be used to the prejudice of names published since that date ;” and in the explanatory remarks, it is said :—‘‘ We ought not to attempt to carry back the principle of priority deyond the date of the 12th edition of the Systema Nature, 1766.” (Vol. I., issued 1766; vol. II., in which are the insects, 1767.) Mr. Kirby, in his Catalogue of Lepidoptera lately published (1870), follows the Rule, and would ignore all names prior to 1767. Dr. Staudinger, in his Catalogue of European Lepidoptera, also published *Norz.—See also a very able pamphlet by Mr. Lewis, entitled ‘‘ A Discussion of the Laws of Priority in Entomological Nomenclature,” Lond. 1872, which I advise all persons who care to make themselves better acquainted with the subject, to obtain. It may be had through the Naturalists’ Agency, Salem, bo wt THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. in 1871, adopts the roth edition of the same work (1758), and says dis- tinctly :—‘“‘ Every name given before 1758 loses its right.” | Others go back to various earlier dates. If the earliest Linnzan edition comes to be claimed as having a prior right over those that followed, as symptoms indicate, then there will be a sweeping away of landmarks, that will make the lesser floods hitherto experienced seem as nothing. The result of all these efforts at stability, for that is the avowed object of the advocates of rigid priority of date, is extreme confusion,* instead of the agreement hoped for when the Code of the British Association was adopted, and students of one branch of Entomology at least are at a loss to know where the Nomenclature stands to-day, and are very certain that under the present order of things there will not be aname familiar to them that 20 or 50 years hence will not be supplanted under the claims of priority. The Code of the British Association not only has not been adopted in detail by the British naturalists, who might be supposed to have given their assent to-it, but it has not been adopted in other countries.t It is not the law of France nor of Germany. In the latter country, in 1858, a Code of Nomenclature was adopted by the Dresden Congress, in which the Rule on the subject of priority more sensibly meets the requirements * Prof. Verrill, in his comment on Rule 2, says:—‘‘ Disregard of this important and essential law (viz., fixing the 12th edition as the starting point,) has brought into Conchology, and some other branches of Zoology, an almost incredible amount of con- fusion.” : + ‘* Notwithstanding the Rules sanctioned by the authority of the Brit. Ass’n, it would not seem that any perceptible improvement has taken place.” —G. R. Crotch, Cist. Ent., 1872 Mr. Kirby has revised, &c., ‘‘in accordance with a series of Rules selected from those issued by the Brit. Ass’n for 1865.” — Wallace. Dr. Thorell ‘‘refers to the old Brit. Ass’n Rules with general approval, but differs from them in some important points. ”—J/bid. Dr. Staudinger lays down eight rules that vary from those of the Brit. Ass’n or from Kirby and Thorell in several particulars. And Gemminger and Harold’s Cat. Coleopt. differs in the Rules applied from all the others. See Wallace. As to French authors, the following extract of a letter to me from a distinguished English Entomologist will show how heterodox is their position :—‘‘The chief confusion in generic Nomenclature is owing to the French, who consistently ignore or alter every * thing done in other countries, on purpose to force their own names on the world in place of others.” 26 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. of the case. “ The principle of preserving the oldest of the names given to the same insect ts not absolute; the choice between them, following the greater or tess degree of convenience, remains free.” Until quite lately, although there was a general feeling among Lepi- dopterists that the hunt for new names was getting to be a nuisance that demanded abatement, there seems to have been no active opposition te it, till the publication of the Catalogues of Staudinger and Kirby, and, in this country, of Scudder’s Revision. The changes announced in these works amount to a revolution of much of the existing Nomenclature. In the Revision the names of American species have been changed largely. and of genera almost altogether. For example: of the Butterflies found in New England, out of 28 hitherto recognized genera (omitting the Hesperide) Mr. Scudder has left but three untouched; of five others he has retained the name, but restricted the genus; but of nineteen he has changed the names altogether, displacing well-known names by others purporting to have been found in ancient authors, and mostly in Hubner. And from the twenty-eight genera have now proceeded fifty- one. Whilst of the Hesperide he has made forty-five genera for one hundred and thirty-eight species, besides giving a horrid array of barbaric family and tribal names, remnants of systems ages. ago deservedly exploded. Mr. Kirby’s “ Revision has the effect of abolishing scores of old and familiar names (generic) and replacing them by others altogether new to the majority of Lepidopterists ” Wad/ace :and Mr. Crotch, by following out his mode of determining typical species, “shows us that Mr. Kirby is wrong in the names of twenty-seven genera,” defined before Hubner, and in a letter he says: ‘I stopped abruptly at 1816, as the question of Hubner’s Verzeichness beat me,” to which bewilderment we should be grateful, for the assimilative powers of that author are fearful. The trouble caused by the strict application of Rule 1 to specific names becomes intensified when applied to generic names. It mightbe supposed in the hunt for the former, that if the several authors now at variance could be got to interpret the ancient descriptions by the same illumination, and could agree upon a starting point, the ultimate name of each species would some day be reached. It might require a long period, but it would seem possible. Not so with genera. Even when the final stage of disinte- gration was reached, and each species stood in a genus by itself, there would be a never-ending contest as to whether such genus should bear THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 27 _ the stamp of Fabricius, or Latreille, or Hubner, and each successive ““ resurrectionist,” as these exhumers of dry bones are irreverently called, ‘would but glory in upsetting the platforms of his predecessors, and would ‘prove to a nicety that they and their systems were all wrong. Now, it is a matter for admiration that, notwithstanding the imposing names attached ‘to these generic creations, every one of them is the result of the labor of Brown, Smith or Jones, alive and industriously working, and that the -ancient worthies, so honorably preferred, lived and died in happy ignor- .ance of the progeny after ages would attribute to them. Now, it is insisted by those who rigidly adhere to the application of the priority theory to generic names that the original name given to a _genus must never be lost, no matter what changes are made with the genus, although to retain such name may be to attribute to its original author -exactly what he did not mean, and perhaps never would have sanctioned. Rule 4th says:—‘‘A generic name, when once established, should never be cancelled in any subsequent subdivision of the group, but re- ‘tained, in a restricted sense, for one of the constituent portions.” And Rule 5th:—‘ The generic name should always be retained for that portion of the original genus which was considered typical by its author.” That is to say, Papilio of Linnzeus embraced what is now divided into very many genera, and the name Papilio must somewhere be retained. What particular species Linnzeus would have chosen for the type of the _genus, had he foreseen its future disintegration, is not known, and in the absence of such knowledge, authors now would differ in selecting the typical species; and unless there is agreement on that, it is plain that nothing but discord can follow. Mr. Kirby says, following the Rules:— “In subdividing a genus, the original name should be restricted to the typical sections if this can be ascertained.” I have asked of an eminent Ornithologist what would be done in such case in his science, and he replied as follows:—‘“ It is our custom to take the first name mentioned by an author as the type of his genus, unless another be especially claimed ; .and, if this genus be subsequently subdivided, to insist that the original name must be retained for the first species of the original list, unless there are very grave reasons to the contrary. I notice, in the roth edition of Linnzus, the first Papilio is Priamus, from Amboyna. I should, there- fore, be inclined to maintain that the name Papilio should be retained for that first mentioned species, whatever else might befall the group. This ‘being premised, the author engaged in overhauling a group has the right 28 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ———, to select any other species of the original section as the type of his new _ genus.” Mr. Crotch says (Cist. Ent., 1872) “‘ No genus can be considered defined until its type is indicated,” but when this is not done by the original author, “I am not inclined to cut the knot by taking the first species, but to trace the genus historically until it has a type given to it ;” and “Cuvier (1799) gives precision to the old genera by characterizing them and indicating their types.” Let us apply these dicta to Vanessa Antiopa as metamorphosed into Pa- pilio Antiopa by Mr. Scudder. He says:—‘‘The generic name Papilio. was applied by Linnzus to all the butterflies at the foundation of the binomial system of Nomenclature. Fabricius, in his later works, restricted. it to the Nymphales and Pafgilionides. Schrank was the next author to restrict the name, limiting it, in 1801, to most of the Nymphales.” By Rule 5, or by Mr. Kirby’s Rule, the original name having to be- restricted to the typical section, Schrank should have left it with some part of the Papilionides of Fabricius, for I suppose no one can doubt that: the swallow-tailed butterflies were the typical section of Linnzus (Equites), even though his typical species may be in question. Had he bound himself by the ornithological dictum, he would also have restricted. the name to the Pafiiionides, Priamus being the typical species. By that of Mr. Crotch he would still have been restricted to the Papilionides, making P. Machaon the type, because Cuvier (in 1799) made this species the type of the genus Pafi/io (and so it is recognized to-day and I hope will be for all future time.) But, says Mr. Scudder, “If the laws of priority have any force or meaning, I do not see how we can refuse to acknowledge the claims of Schrank. I select, accordingly, from among the species grouped under Papilio by Linnzeus, Fabricius and Schrank, one of ¢he dest known European butterflies as most suitable for the type of the genus.” And by this. curious process, one of the dest known species being selected as the type, we get the astonishing creation Papilio Antiopa.—(Scud.) And this is. equivalent to enunciating another dictum, being the fourth on this head, by which the dest known species of a genus is to be the typical. | Moreover, such exceedingly minute definition is given to the new genus that it would appear to be impossible that a second species could ever be embraced. within it.* * I notice that Mr. Scudder speaks of the ‘‘ insufficiency of their generic descrip- tions” being ‘‘ the reproach of Lepidopterists.” Mr. Wallace, on the other hand, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 29: _ Now, here are four modes of determining the typical species of a genus, propounded by as many authors, and there may be others for aught I know to the contrary, all with the view of simplifying these sciences, under the operation of Rule 1. Isit strange that “an incredible amount of confusion” is the result ? Linnzus placed under Papilio the princes of the order, and no matter what restrictions may have been made hitherto, these hundred years, Papilio has always had a magnificent following, increasing in splendor as the years wenton. And now we are told, in 1872, that, in order to save the claims of the hitherto unappreciated Schrank, who published his speculations in 1801, Papilio is to be ejected from his. rich possessions, and made to share the rest of his unlucky days with the- dingy Vanessan to whom hard fate and Mr. Seudder has driven him. No more the superb creature we have read of, with “ glistering burganet,”” and “shinie wings as silver bright,”—“ refreshing his sprights,” in “ gay gardins,” ‘ pasturing on the pleasures,” &c.; but, like Clarion, “ reduced to lowest wretchedness,” his good times all over, he flits about in slums and nasty lanes—and there we leave him. In the explanatory remarks to Rule 4, it is said:—‘It is an act of- justice to the original author that his generic name should never be lost sight of.” By Mr. Scudder’s new creation the name Papilio is so nearly- lost sight of that it might as well disappear altogether. It is certainly- no compliment to Linnzus to retain it. And this brings up the whole question of the obligation of naturalists. to adopt whatever system any one may propose. Clearly enough, the right of ignoring changes made in Nomenclature is recognized even by- the most determined advocates of strict priority, when applied to their- contemporaries. A genus is set up, andno one follows it. It happens constantly, and it seems to me that in this matter one’s contemporaries. are the proper judges of one’s work, and that no reversal of their judg-- ment may rightfully be looked for from posterity, and therefore the writings. asserts that the definitions of a Westwood, or of a Doubleday, are ‘‘ careful and. elaborate.” I was much struck on reading these words in Cope’s Origin of Genera, _ page 6:—‘“‘ The reader will often find introduced into diagnoses of genera characters. which indicate nothing of this sort ;”’ and these, ‘‘adjacent genera of the same series. differ from each other but by a single character.” From which it may be inferred _ that inordinate length of generic description is not commendable, and is not properly- attainable. 30 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. of authors whose systems were rejected in their own day, and whose generic creations were ignored not only by contemporaries, but for gen- erations afterwards, cannot properly be appealed to. If there was injustice -done to them itis too late to remedy it, and justice at this late day means injustice to those in present possession, and whose title often has the strength of nearly a century’s undisputed possession. We cannot judge of the circumstances that influenced the contemporaries of such authors, and with the views prevailing at the time, their judgment was right. Therefore, when Schrank, and Hubner and others, are sought to be rein- ‘stated, and a host of generic names set aside, the later injustice is worse than the first,—if there was any first, and of that we have no knowledge. Otherwise, fifty years hence a system or a genus proposed by an author of to-day, though rejected by every naturalist living, for defects that appeal ‘to the sense of each one of them, may be reinstated in spite of such con- temporary judgment. It has become more and more the practice, for twenty years past, to ignore all genera created since Hubner, and to replace subsec uent names by names taken from that author, who published a Catalogue of Lepidop- tera, in which nearly every species stands by itself, in a division that, whatever it may be called, is not generic. Of course it is easy to apply -one of his names to every genus that can be now created. By his con- temporaries, and for a generation after his works were published, his fan- -ciful divisions and fanciful names were rejected, and it is only of late years that some authors have discovered that in his works is a mine of wealth. But on this head it is sufficient to give the words of an Entomologist whose authority is second to none. — I quote from the annual Address (1871) to the Lond. Ent. Soc., by Mr. Alfred R. Wallace, President of the Society, and I quote at some length, as it seems to me desirable that American Lepidopterists should be made aware that Hubner’s claims are not yet everywhere acknowledged :—‘“‘ By far the most important -and most numerous alterations are caused by adopting the names of an author who has long been purposely ignored as an authority for genera both by English and Continental Lepidopterists. I of course allude to Hubner.” “Such old names as Chionobas, Agraulis, Eresia, Godartia, Adolias, Polyommatus, Leptalis, Terias, Callidryas, Thestias, Anthocaris, with many more, are changed for others to be found in no other work than Hubner’s obsolete and useless Catalogue. Yet this wholesale change THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 31 does not seem to be warranted by the Rules of the British Association. Rule 12th says:-—“ A name which has never been clearly defined in some published work, should be changed for the earliest name by which the object shall have been so defined.” And in the explanatory remarks it is said, “Definition properly implies a distinct exposition of essential characters, and in all cases we conceive this to be indispensable.” Now this Rule merely embodied the feeling and practice of naturalists, and it had been acted on for thirty years, before it had been formally enunciated, in this very case of Hubner, whose work had been systemati- ‘cally set aside as an authority by most European Entomologists, because it was felt that his so-called genera were mere guesses founded on facies alone,—happy guesses, no doubt, sometimes—but as frequently wrong as right, and wholly without such definition as was held, even in his own day, to be required to constitute a new genus. Boisduval expressly states this, and his non-recognition of Hubner’s genera has been followed in almost all the great systematic works which have since been published. If we take Hubner’s first four genera and the characters he gives them, we shall be able to judge of the reasons for this course. ‘They are as follows: MMMDEE Ree Nald. Naela den oh et os upper wings half banded. ANI Sa ease ee Ge ea a 5 “ — one-banded. DMM 0 eS tay OS cee bee a *¢ twice-banded DENCE a oh Ss ath eee sn oie Sela Ered soo a'os both wings banded. Such a mode of defining genera, though it has the merit of being sim- ple and symmetrical, is undoubtedly superficial, and it can only be by the purest accident that a group so characterized can correspond in extent to any real genus. * * * In Mr. Kirby’s own work, we find Hubner’s con- demnation in almost every page, in the utter want of agreement between his groups and modern genera. The modern restricted genus Helicon- ius, for instance, contains species belonging to seven Hubnerian genera ; Pieris comprises five, and Thecla twelve of these hap-hazard groups; while, in other cases, the species comprising Hubner’s groups are divided among several unrelated modern genera. * * * * The names sought to be reinstated, rank as mere catalogue names for want of proper defini- tion, and should therefore never be quoted. * * * Even as a matter of justice it may be maintained that we should recognize the careful and elaborate definitions of a Doubleday or Westwood, rather than the childish guesses of a Hubner. * * * The proper course to be taken is to rein- 32 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. state every name which of late years has been made to give place to one of Hubner’s, and further, to treat the Verzeichniss bekannter Schmetterlinge as a mere Catalogue, which can never be quoted as an authority for genera.” Now with regard to the remedy for the evil complained of. There have been various suggestions of Rules by foreign authors, many of which would meet the assent of most Entomologists, and it is easy to select from these authors both Rules and arguments for their adoption. _I_ will call attention to so many of these suggested Rules as seem to me to meet the difficulty of the case, and to others, which might properly form part of a code, and will give short extracts illustrating them. I mention them for the purpose of exciting discussion as to their fitness for the end in view, and that Lepidopterists may know what is the opinion of students in other branches of Entomology besides their own: 1 There must be intelligible description and publication in case of a species, or arecognizable figure. In case of a genus there must be a definition giving the essential characters.—/v0m Dr. Thorell’s European Spiders, quoted in Wallace's Address, before cited. 2. In determining the priority of specific names, notice should be taken only of those works in which the Linnean binomial nomenclature is: exclusively and consistently employed.— Zhorell. Note—*“ The binomial system of nomenclature was fully and distinctly propounded by Linnzus in the Philosophia Botanica, published in 1751, and there can beno reason whatever why authors who adopted and sys- tematically applied it should be set aside, because Linnzeus himself did not apply it to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms till 1758.”— Thorell. . 3. The same date should apply to generic as to specific names, both being characteristic of the binomial nomenclature, and it being impossible if we go back earlier, to determine what are to be considered as truly generic names.—/#id. 4. Between two specific names in use, the prior right shall belong to: the first named. But no name in use shall give way to an obsolete or rejected name, even though the latter be of prior date—Weallace’s Ad- dress, p. 67. Note.—‘ The idea of justice to the namer or describer of a species is sometimes appealed to, but the law of priority is founded on no such THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 33 expressed idea, but rather on the universal practice of mankind, which always upholds stability of nomenclature, and requires cogent reasons of beauty or convenience to sanction its alteration. * * * * * * “The proper Rule to adopt (instead of Rule r of Brit. Ass’n.) would have been wnchangeability of names in use, rather than priority of date, which latter rule ought only to have been brought in to decide on the claims of two or more names in use, not to retain obsolete names never in use, or long ago rejected.—Jdid. ‘What we want for the sake of knowledge is stability and uniformity of nomenclature, not an upsetting of it by the substitution of old, forgotten and very doubtful names, published in works without, or with very little scientific merit.,.—Dr. Schaum, on Nomenclature of British Carabidae, Ent. -Ann., 1860. “The rule of priority in Nomenclature, I hold to bea good rule within its proper limits; it is not an unmixed good; and priority, like every other hobby-horse, may be ridden too hard. When the rule is strained beyond the reason for the rule, it becomes a nuisance,—nay more, it pro- duces intolerable evil; but when reasonably applied, it produces more convenience than inconvenience. I accept it, therefore, as a rule for con- venience, and nothing more, a rule adopted for the benefit of science, not for the glorification of name givers.” —¥. W. Dunning, Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. 8, 215. *- In systematic nomenclature the object is to register titles, not to gratify pride, and the names of authors are appended for convenience, not fame; the question of justice or injustice has no place here.”—Scudder, Am. Fo. Arts and Sci., 1872. “Both sides agree that the accord of Entomologists is the ultimate desideratum. I hold that the law of priority is not that the oldest name of an insect is invariably the right one, but that in cases of dispute, the prior name is to be preferred, and in such cases only ; and that any at- tempt to subvert accord cannot be done under the law of priority, but we must make a new law—the law of antiquity say. * * * * Insuch event, every insect capable of identification must henceforth carry the name under which it was first called—no matter by whom—no matter the language. The American fire-fly must bear its Indian appellation— the ‘ Palmer-worm’ and the ‘Canker-worm’ must have their ‘ prior’ names restored ; we must carry the law back without limit—even to chaos itself.” —T. Hi. Briggs, Ent. Mo. Mag. vol. 8, p. 93. 34 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. “ Nobody but a fool or a madman would try to persuade the modern New Yorkers to call their city New Amsterdam, or the English to have their letters addressed to Londinium, because these were the old original names. And yet, what men of the world would never dream of doing certain scientific men are doing every day.”—Walsh, Am. Ent., 1872. 5. The name placed after a genus shall be that of the-author who established the genus in the sense in which it is actually used—Dr. Sharp, in Nature, Feb., 1872. Note.—* Carabus of Linnzeus included all the insects now comprised in the family Carabidz, at present divided into several hundreds of gen- era. To write, therefore, Carabus, Linn., when we mean something else, may be usual, but is not desirable.”—_Dr. Sharp, ibid. I do not deny to any author the right to establish new genera. Quite the contrary. But I would insist on these genera standing on their own merits, and claim for the Entomological world the right to accept them or not, as they choose. If any one thinks it worth while to break up Papilio, for instance, let him do so at his pleasure, but do not let him apply to the severed parts names taken from Hubner or other ancient author, in order to give these brand-new creations a smack of age, and so get the advan- tage of another author who may honestly put his name to his own work It is by this species of wrong that Nisoniades, Hubner has supplanted Thanaos, Boisduval ; Oeneis, Hub. is trying to supplant Chionobas, Bois. ; Polygonia, Hub. thrusts itself into the place of Grapta, Kirby, and so in cases innumerable. Rules 4 and 5, if carried out, must pul an effectual es to the perpetual shifting of names. Other Rules, which might properly form part of a Code, are as tollows:— 6. The same specific name may be employed in genera saree remote from each other.— Staudinger, Cat. 7. Ifa species has received different names for its sexes, that first given shall be retained. 8. The names of species should properly be Latin, or Latinized to the extent that renders them capable of being used in scientific Latin. But names once given are not to be altered or set aside for any defect or errors.—Dr. Sharp, before cited. “Tt matters not in the least by what conventional sound we agree to designate an individual object, provided the sign to be employed be THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 35 stamped with such an authority as will suffice to make it pass current.” — Lxplan. Rem. to Rule r. “The name originally given, even though it may be inferior in point of elegance or expressiveness to those subsequently proposed, ought, as a. general principle, to be permanently retained.” —/did. 9. The same generic name may be employed in Botany, but not in Zoology. I have heard the objection to the application of the above Rules, that Entomologists have no right to separate themselves from other naturalists, and make a special Code for their own sole guidance. To this I would reply, why not? _—_If itis found impossible to enact a series of Rules that will meet the requirements of the several branches of Natural Science, and the experience of thirty years shows that the thing is impracticable, why should not each branch adopt Rules to suit its own case? If Botany may be excluded from the operations of a Code, why not Entomology ? It is very certain that in other branches than Entomology there is wide- spread dissatisfaction, and I believe an effort for reform in any direction will be met by general approval. At all events, as the dissatisfaction felt on this side the Atlantic has found expression, and a set of Rules is to be prepared as aforesaid, by a Committee of experienced Entomologists, it may be left to them to estimate the force of this and any other objection, and to report accordingly. But Entomology is peculiar in one respect, and if there were no other reason, this alone would make it imperative that its votaries should resist strenuously unnecessary changes in Nomenclature, even if, by so doing, they should separate themselves from other naturalists. This is the only branch of Natural History that is becoming thoroughly popular through organized effort. Nottospeak of Europe, the Governments of the United States, and many of the individual States, and Canada, employ professional Entomologists, who make frequent Reports that are printed by authority, and widely disseminated with the view of rendering the people intelligently acquainted with their native insects. Several Magazines have been pub- lished, which are exclusively devoted to the same subjeet,and the numerous agricultural weeklies or monthlies set apart a portion of their space for En- tomology. Professedly, the object is to give information upon insects injuri- ous to vegetation, but that includes, in one relation or other, every insect. The expensive treatise of Dr. Harris was published by the State of Massachusetts, and is everywhere a received authority. Packard’s 36 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. ‘Guide to the Study of Insects, has passed through three large editions, in as many years, and is rapidly becoming the text book used in our schools and colleges. The result is that a vast degree of attention is concentrated upon En- tomology, a hundred fold, I venture to say, more than upon Botany or ‘Geology,and a thousand-fold more than upon Ornithology or Mammalogy. In these branches, therefore, a disturbance of names would affect scarcely any but special students, and if they do not care to resist innovations, it isnot our concern. But, from the nature of the case, in Entomology, the advantage gained by disseminating information depends wholly upon the precision with which the objects treated of can be identified, and pre- cision can result only fromthe use of a common Nomenclature. If one Treatise dilates upon the habits of an insect by one name, and the next Report under another, and anybody may shift about the names, specific and generic, at will, nothing can result but incomprehersibility and disgust. What man reading the history of Papilio Asterias, figured with all its preparatory stages, and colored to the life, in Harris, and the larva of which species he recognises as one of the pests of his garden, will com- prehend what the Annual Report of his State Agricultural Society for 1873 shall say upon Amaryssus Polyxenes? or, his old acquaintance, familiar from boyhood, that he has been instructed to call Papilio Turnus, when he shall read about Euphceades Glaucus? Mr. Wallace well says, “Tntelligible language is wholly founded on stability of Nomenclature, and we should soon cease to be able to understand each other’s speech, if the practice of altering all names we thought we could improve upon became general.” I hope, therefore, that the Entomological section of the American As- sociation, at its next Meeting, will adopt a new or amended Code, having in mind the exigencies of their own science only, and that full dis- cussion and interchange of opinion having meantime been had, such Code will express the views of the great majority of the Entomologists of this continent. Ifthe Rules are sensible, they will recommend themselves to the Entomologists of other countries, and in time secure general adoption. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. oF ON SOME OF OUR COMMON INSECTS. I. CABBAGE BUTTERFLIES. BY THE EDITOR. In pursuance of our plan of laying before our readers, from time to time, illustrated descriptions of the common insects of this country, we propose to begin in this number of our journal some account of the Butterflies belonging to the genus Preris—familiarly known in their larval state as “‘Cabbage-Worms.”. As stated by our coadjutor, Mr. Saunders, in the first paper of this series (C. E., v., page 4), we do not profess to bring out any new facts or information of interest and value to the experienced Entomologist, but we wish to afford to our less scientific readers plain descriptions, with illustrations, of our more common insects, in order that any one beginning to collect and observe may be able to identify and learn something about what he meets with. Such being our object, we shall not hesitate to make use of all available information, whether derived from our own or extraneous sources, and shall not pretend to be especially original in our descriptions or remarks. The genus /zeris is represented in Canada by but three species ( Oleracea, Rape and Protodice), all of them white butterflies of moderate size, with more or less conspicuous black markings. The first-mentioned species, the Pot-herb Butterfly (P. O/eracea, Harris), is our native .repre- sentative of the genus, being found all over the northern portion of this continent, from Nova Scotia and Maine in the East to the District of Algoma and even Manitoba in the North-West. It has been occasionally observed south of Lake Ontario, but very rarely as low down as Pennsyl- yania ; at Ottawa, Collingwood, and other northern localities in Ontario, it is generally quite abundant every year, but it is seldom observed in any great numbers at Toronto or other places in the same latitude. When prevalent, it is usually to be seen on the wing from May to September, there being at least two broods in the year. The Oleracea Butterfly (Fig. 7), may be at once distinguished from all other Canadian species by its almost pure white wings, destitute of spots or other markings on the upper surface ; towards the tip and also next the 38 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. body the forewings are slightly discoloured with dusky scales. On the . Fig. 7. under surface the wings are sometimes of Maa yellowish hue, with the veins broadly marked with black or dark green; some- ¥ times they are entirely white, with the veins merely faintly outlined in black ; between these two extremes many grada- tions of shade may be observed. The pure white specimens found in the North West were supposed at one time to be a ° —— = == clistinct species, and were described by Kirby under the name of the “Chaste Butterfly” (P. Casta) ; there isno doubt now, however, that these are merely varieties of the same species. The legs and body of the insect are black ; its wings expand to a breadth of about two inches, but there is considerable variation in the size of individuals. ec = The butterfly, about the end of May or beginning of June, and again towards the close of summer, may be seen hovering over the food-plants of its larve, preparing to deposit its eggs. These are pear-shaped, or oval, of a yellow-green colour, and measure about one-twentieth of an inch in length, and a third of this amount in diameter ; they are ribbed ' longitudinally with about fifteen sharp-edged lines. The parent deposits them singly, and rarely more than one on a leaf, on the underside of the Icaves ot the cabbage, turnip, radish, mustard and other plants of the order Crucifere. They are hatched in about a week or ten days. The young larva is pale green, cylindrical in shape, and covered with short, whitish hairs. In order to escape from the egg it makes an opening with its jaws and then eats the shell until the aperture is large enough to admit of its easy egress ; it subsequently devours the greater part of the shell that remains. At first the new-born caterpillar is less than one- twelfth of an inch in length, but it grows rapidly, until it attains its full size, about an inch and a quarter, in the brief space of a fortnight. The mature larva (Fig. 7, a) is pale green in colour, with numerous darker dots and a dark line along the back ; it closely resembles the ribs of the leaf upon which it feeds. When mature, the caterpillar forsakes its food plant and crawls away to some secluded spot, such as the under side of a stone or board, or a crevice in a fence or wall; there it spins a knot of silk to which it fastens its hindermost pair of feet; then it proceeds to form a loop of silk which THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 39 it dexterously fashions into a girth around the middle, and thus supported finally turns into a chrysalis. This is pale green or whitish, finely and regularly speckled with black, and in shape much resembles that of P. rape, of which an illustration will be hereafter given. In summer the chrysalis state lasts only a week or ten days, but in the case of the autumn brood the insect remains in this condition all winter and only conies forth as a Butterfly in the April or May following. REVIEWS. ConTRIBUTIONS TO ENTOMOLOGY FROM THE STATE OF New York. —Two works of value on the life history of various insects taken in the neighbouring State of New York, are before us; both of them emanate from official sources, and singularly enough, both appeared but a few months ago, though the Reports to which they belong have reference to the year 1869. The first to which we would draw attention is entitled ** ENTOMOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS,” by Mr. J. A. Lintner.* It contains a remarkably elaborate description of the metamorphoses and whole life history of the handsome but rare moth Hemileuca Maia, Drury, occupying _nearly twenty pages, accompanied by a lithographed plate of egg, chry- salis and imago, and constituting an excellent monograph of the species. This is followed by interesting observations upon various stages in the life of the butterflies We/it2a Phaeton, Fab., Ml. Nycteis, Doubl.. and Pieris Oleracea, Harris. The author then describes, with illustrations, three new species of Misoniades, named Scelus, Lucilius and Ausonius; and a new Sphinx, El/ema pineum, which will probably be found in Canada, if it be not already in some of our collections under the name of Z. Harrisii—a closely allied species. A list of forty species of Sphingide, another of over a hundred butterflies, and calendars of butterflies and moths, com- plete the author’s observations. To these he has appended a very useful list, with references to volume and page, of all the North American moths, some 600 in number, described in Guenee’s Species General des Lepidop- teres. The volume is concluded by a translation from the German of a paper by Dr. Speyer on Cucullia intermedia, Spey., and C. lucifuga, W. V., to which Mr. Lintner has prefixed some notes on the larve. We have ’ given a full account of the contents of this volume in order that the student may know where to look for very valuable contributions to our _* Entomological Contributions, by J. A. Lintner. From the twenty-third Annual Report of the New York State Cabinet of Natural History. for the year 1869. 8vo., pp, 90. 40 _ THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. knowledge of the species referred to. We trust that Mr. Lintner will not relax in his efforts, but wili continue to afford us year by year a complete record of his most pains-taking and accurate observations. The other work, to which we have alluded above, is Dr. FITCH’s THIRTEENTH REPoRT as Entomologist of the State Agricultural Society of New York.t -It opens with a long account of the synonymy and natural history of the Bean Aphis (4. rumicis, Linn.,) followed by descriptive notices of the Black-lined Plant-bug (PAytocoris lineatus, Fab.,) the Lilac Measure-worm (Priocycla armataria, H. Sch.,) and a new species of the latter genus, P. Fohnsonaria, Fitch. ‘The remainder of the Report is occupied by a very long and minute account of the two Cab- bage Butterflies (Pieris oleracea and P. rape), covering some six and thirty pages. The diffuseness of these notices leads one to wish that the talented author would extend his observations to some other department of economic Entomology, and afford us, as he is so well able, concise and accurate accounts of species that are not yet familiarly known. While upon this subject we cannot forbear complaining of the excessive difficulty there appears to be in obtaining Dr. Fitch’s Reports; we have tried in vain to obtain his roth, r1th and r2th, and only succeeded as a special favour in getting the one we have just noticed. We are sure that — Entomologists would esteem it as a great boon were they permitted to purchase these Reports separate from the volumes of Agricultural Tran-’ sactions, at some reasonable price. The Naturalists Agency at Salem would, we should think, be an excellent and convenient depository for them. The volume of ‘ Transactions’ contains also an admirable account of “The Grasses and their Culture,’ by the Hon. J. Stanton Gould, illus- trated by upwards of 70 beautiful lithographed plates. For SaLe.—A fine collection of named Shells, mostly marine—com- prising about 1800 species, with numerous varieties and many rare shells. Also about 200 species of Corals and Radiates. The specimens are all in the finest order, having been selected with a view to their perfection and beauty. The collection embraces about 6000 specimens. For further information address D. W. Frercuson, Corner of Hester and Elizabeth Streets, New York. + Thirteenth Report on the Noxious, Beneficial and other Insects of the State of New York. By Asa Fitch, M.D. Transactions of the New York State Agri- cultural Society for the year 1869. Albany. Che Canadian Entomologist. VOR/-ve’ > LONDON, ONT., MARCH, 1873. No. 3 ON SOME OF OUR COMMON INSECTS. —es Mll. CABBAGE BUTTERFLIES. BY THE EDITOR. The next species of Pzeris on our list—the Rape Butterfly (P. rape, Linn.,) though an European insect, is rapidly becoming one of our com- monest and most destructive species, especially in the Eastern portion of the Dominion. The history of its arrival near Quebec in some ocean steamship, its discovery by Mr. Couper in 1859, its capture in abundance at Quebec by Mr. Bowles, in 1863, and its subsequent rapid spread in all directions is probably well known to all our readers. It is needless, then, for us to dwell upon it here; we may merely state further that it had reached the city of New York in 1869, Halifax, N. S., in 1871, and last ‘year it had come as far west as Belleville and Trenton, Ont. We fully expect to see it at Port Hope this year! . The Rape Butterfly, like the preceding species, is white, with a black dash at the tip of the forewings, a black spot on the front margin of the wigs os hind wings, and in the male (Fig. 8) one black spot in the middle of the forewings, but in the female (Fig. 9) two. The under surface of the forewings, in both sexes, is marked by ‘wo spots, corresponding to those on the upper surface in the _ female ; in other respects the wings are much alike on both sides, except that beneath there is a tint of yellow at base and tip. Occasionally ma/e specimens are found of a bright yellow colour, like our common Sulphur-yellow Butterfly (Co/ias philodice) ; to 42, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. : this variety, which does not occur at all in Europe, Mr. Scudder has given Fig. 9. the name of /Vovangliae, trom the first observed specimens having been found in the New England States. Dr. Fitch gives it as his opinion that this colour is produced by seclusion from light (13th Report, p. 559), but we should think it much more probably caused by peculiarity of food. Mr. Caulfield, of Montreal, (C. E., iv., p. 203,) is stated indeed to have found the yellow colour displayed when the larvae had been fed upon mignonette. We must await fuller observations, however, before we can feel justified in adopting any particular theory upon the subject. The larva (Fig. to, a) of this Butterfly is, when full grown, of a pale green colour, finely dotted with black, with a yellowish dorsal stripe, and a series of small yellow spots forming a stripe along each side; its length is about an inch and a quarter. It feeds, like P. o/eracea, upon various species of cruciferous plants, especially upon the cabbage, to which it is most destructive. In this case it bores down, when feeding, into the very heart of the plant and thus renders the vegetable quite unfit for food. It forms its chrysalis (Fig. 10, 4) in the same kinds of situations and in a similar manner to the preceding species. In this state it remains, in summer, for from a week to a fortnight, but in the autumn it continues as a pupa until the following spring. There are at least two, ean perhaps three, broods in the year. ‘The ravages of this insect in Northern America are beginning to be somewhat checked by a parasite (Prteromalus puparum, Linn.) ; it belongs to the ichneu- mon family, and is a four-winged fly, about one-eighth of an inch long, with a golden-hued body and a bright green head. The remaining species of Pieris found in Canada— the Southern Cabbage Butterfly (Pieris protodice, Boisd.) —is quite a rarity with us, though oftentimes very abundant in the western and more southern States. Last August we foun it to be the commonest butterfly about Chicago and through the States of Illinois and Iowa. Like the other two species, it is white with black markings ; the accompanying illustrations so well represent the butterfly THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 43 that we need not occupy our space with any special description. (Fig. Fig. 11. Ir, with the comparatively few black spots, represents the male. Fig. 12, the female, with its much more numerous and conspicuous spots and markings.) The chrysalis (Fig. 13, 4) is over half an inch in length, of a light bluish-gray color, more or less pro- fusely speckled with black, with the projecting portions tinted with pale yellow or flesh color, and marked with large black dots. The caterpillar (Fig. 13, a) varies in colour from == deep to pale bluish and green; it has four longitudinal yellow stripes, and is thickly covered with black dots. As in the other species there are two broods in the year, and the winter is passed in the pupa state. In the Southern States it is a very injurious insect, but here it Fig. 13. is too rare to be more than an interesting curiosity. his Another species of Pieris (P. frigida, Scudder) has been taken in Labrador and on the Island of Anticosti, but it is not likely ever to spread much, or to be ranked = E amongst ‘ common insects.’ oes — MN yi;, 44, tas > ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOME GENERA OF CANADIAN INSECTS. BY FRANCIS WALKER, LONDON, ENGLAND. Isosoma.—So much has been lately written about this genus that it may be dismissed with a few words. The Zurytomidac, to which it belongs, were considered by Nees to be in a debatable state between the 44 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Chalcidiae and the Cynips tribe, and though they are now fixed with the Chalcidiae, there is still matter for argument as to their maintenance by animal life, or by vegetable life, or as to how they are divided between these two means of existence. Nees mentions his discovery of a gall- making urytoma, and Girand announces his ascertaining the vegetable food of Jsosoma, a fact afterwards observed by Moncreaff, but this genus has more importance in the U. States, where Harris, Fitch and others have been witnesses of its ravages on corn. But the most interesting part of its history is in Canada where a species occurs in grape seeds, and is remarkable not only on account of the singularity of its abode, but also by the contrariety of the sexes, one of them representing the carnivorous. Eurytoma, and the other the herbivorous /sosoma, and thus one species figuratively combines the diminishers of vegetation and the controllers of such diminution. Jsosoma is destitute of the metallic hue which is the especial ornament of its tribe, but possesses a compact and elegant form, a finely sculptured thorax, and a highly polished abdomen. It occurs in Australia, in Amurland, and probably in all the chief parts of the earth. PTEROMALUS.—This genus is the last of the Canadian Chalcidiae, and thereby indicates what a multitude of discoveries in this tribe are yet to: be made in Canada. It inhabits all parts of the earth, and the British species are exceedingly numerous. J. fuparum is the type of the genus. and has been long known in Europe. The chrysalis of a butterfly affords. food and lodging for its young ; it was found formerly near Hudson’s Bay, and its appearance in the U. States has been lately a source of gratifica- tion, and it can hardly fail of being shortly recognized in Canada, having now the means of making itself known. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Vol. 5, Pagel5. G. eupatoriella. Ante p. 9. Vol. 4. - The former notice of this species was very brief and imperfect, having, as there stated, been made from a single specimen which had been untimely nipped from its pupacase. Since then I have bred and captured other specimens. It may be G. Venustella Clem., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1860. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 45 _p. 92, and re-described by Dr. Clemens, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila., 1863, p. 216. It does not agree accurately with either of Dr. Clemens’ descriptions, but it seems to be a somewhat variable species, though some of the most striking marks in my three specimens are not mentioned by Dr. Clemens. I therefore retain the above name for the present, at least, as Dr. Clemens gives no measurement for his species, and was unacquainted with its food plant. In the following description I have noted the points in which my specimens differ among themselves and from Dr. Clemens description. Maxillary palpi and basal joint of the labial palpi dark brown; _ter- minal joint white, with a dark brown annulus before the middle. (In one ‘specimen the labial palpi are entirely white, except the annulus. Dr. Clemens’ first description says: “white, with a blackish spot near the middle and one near the tip.” His second says: ‘‘Second joint fuscous at its end, third with a broad fuscous ring.”) Antennae brown ; head white ; thorax white, narrowly margined near the apex with dark brown, and a dark brown line beginning on the head and extending to the apex of the thorax. (Dr. Clemens does not mention this line nor the dark margins.) Primaries dark grayish brown. A white streak along the dorsal margin from the base to about the middle, where it is: confluent with the first dorsal oblique streak. (In one specimen it does not attain the oblique streak. This oblique streak is not mentioned by Clemens, who simply says “the basal portion of the inner margin is white.”) A ‘small white dorsal streak at the beginning of the ciliae (not mentioned by Clemens.) A short white costal streak in the basal portion of the wing ; another about the middle, extending to or crossing the fold and pointing - ttowards the second dorsal streak. (Dr. Clemens calls this second costal ‘streak a fascia extending obliquely across the wings and sometimes con- stricted or partially interrupted near the dorsal margin. If sufficiently interrupted, this- would make my second dorsal streak.) Two narrow white fasciae in the apical part of the wing, the last one not oblique. (Dr. Clemens calls these costal streaks extended to the middle.) All these ‘streaks are dark margined internally, and the two last named are continued into the dorsal ciliae (a mark not mentioned by Clemens.) A fifth white ‘short costal streak at the apex (not mentioned by Clemens, unless this is what he means by “ Ciliae—at the tip of the wings white, touched with black at the ends.”) Ciliae of the general hue, with a dark brown hinder ‘marginal line beyond their middle. Anterior legs dark brown, with yel- 46 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. —— lowish-white tarsi; middle pair like the anterior, except that there is a. white annulation near the middle of the femora; another at its articulation with the tibiae, and another near the base of the tibiae; posterior legs whitish, annulate with dark brown. (Dr. Clemens says nothing about the markings of the legs and tarsi, but in his classification of his species by the color of the tibiae, he places Venusfella in the section ‘ without white tibiae.”) AZ. ex. Y% inch. i The larva may be found in the leaves of Aupatorium ageratoides from July to October, but is rather rare. The mine is at first a short narrow white line, but ends in a large tentiform mine. It. is on the under surface, and the larva frequently leaves one mine to form another. The maxillary palpi are a //#/e larger in this insect. than in Parectopa robiniella Clem.; and I have not examined the neuration of this species, but I think it is evident at a glance that they are congen-- eric. And I do not see how, with a species like this before him, Dr. Clemens could have placed rvodiniella inaseparate genus. In fresh speci-- mens of robiniella the head is zof roughened. At p. 7, vol. 4, anvze, I have suggested that Parectopfa Clem. is simply Zeller’s section of Gracilaria with eight marginal veinlets in the primaries. Zeller’s section agrees nearly with Herrick-Schaffer’s genus, Zuspilapteryx. And a glance at a figure of Gracillaria (Euspilapteryx) amogattela, or G. (Eupilapteryx) phasian- ipinella, as figured by Stainton, Vat. Hist. Tin., or the former in Woods’ Index Entomologicus, settles the position of Parectopa so far as the pattern of coloration can affect it. Many of the species of this genus, when very young, make linear mines. The mines of G. plantaginisella and G. eupatoriella are short,, crooked lines, ending in the large tentiform blotches heretofore described. That of G. salicifolie/a is a narrow white line, sometimes nearly straight and with lateral branches on the underside of Willow leaves; when it: leaves this mine it again enters the underside, but passes immediately through to the upper surface, where it makes the large blotch mine: The statement at p. 20 ave, that it makes but a single mine, is incorrect, as it commonly makes two or three. The young larva is flattened, resembling somewhat a flat Lithocolletis larva. G. purpuriella sometimes pupates. under a web, as stated an/e f. 28, but usually in its cone. The complete cone sometimes occupies an entire leaf; the apex of the leaf is bent over, so that the left edge touches the right one, to which it is fastened; then. the leaf is rolled spirally to the base, and the tip is used to close one end and the base the other, so that the whole leaf is utilized. Many of the THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 47 —— mines, however, are by no means so perfect. Possibly the form of the mine may be useful as indicating the affinities of the species. G. desmodi- foliella Clem. at first makes a narrow linear short mine on the underside of the leaf, ending in a small tent mine, which is indistinguishable from that of Lithocolletis desmodiella Clem., in the same leaves ; afterwards it leaves the mine and rolls the leaf downwards from the tip. The mines of G. (Parectopa) robiniella and G. (Parectopa) lespedesxefoliella Clem. resemble somewhat the mines of the older larvae of G. sadicifoliella.. The larval habits of the other American species are unknown, except G. suglandisnt- eracella, which makes at first a short linear mine ending in a white blotch on the under surface ; at this stage it is indistinguishable from the young mines of some species of Lithocolletis ; when it leaves the mine it feeds, and then pupates under the edge of the leaf turned up. I have seen no account of the European G. juglandiella. The Black Walnut ( Yuglans nigra) is naturalized in Europe. If it is the food plant of juglandiella, then juglandisnigracella or blandella may be the same insect. ORNIX. The species of this genus may be distinguished from those of Graczl- Jaria by the roughened head, the somewhat broader primaries and the duller colors. Many of the species resemble each other very closely, so that, as Mr. Stainton says, the specific characters are to be sought for in the ciliae. “Tn early life the larvae are leaf miners and make mines on the under surface of leaves, difficult to distinguish from those of the genus Lzthocol- letis. "Towards maturity, however, they abandon their mines and feed under a portion of a leaf turned down from its edge, which is bound closely with silk. When they are full fed a small portion of the edge of the leaf is turned over, and the larva weaves its cocoon within the cone thus made.”—Clemens’ Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila., r86r. p. The italics in this quotation are mine. Mr. Stainton gives substantially the same account of their habits. And I believe the species described below as O. inusitatumella is the only known species which has a different habit. O. inusitatumella. WN. sp. Dark iron gray, almost brown. Labial palpi whitish, with a dark brownish gray annulus on the third joint before the tip. Head dirty grayish mixed with brown. Antennae gray brown, faintly annulate with 48 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. white. Thorax and primaries dark iron gray, or brownish ; primaries pale whitish gray along the dorsal margin, dusted with brown. A _ narrow, brown streak from the fold, which widens into three small spots, once near the base, once towards the middle, and once behind the middle. Seven (or eight?) indistinct pale costal streaks, the first before the middle, the last close to the apex ; those in the apical part of the wing are longer than those about the middle, and extend nearly across the wing, and all are internally dark margined. A white spot at the extreme apex, very small, and followed by a minute dark brown dot, behind which is an indistinct brown hinder marginal line. Ciliae of the general hue. A/ar ex. nearly ¥ inch. At the bottom of Z. r76, v. 3, ante, I have mentioned a mine on the upper surface of the leaves of Haw trees, which resembles that of Litho- colletis Virginiella on the upper surface of Ostrya leaves; and which I then supposed to be the mine of an undescribed Zithocolletis. (As willbe hereafter explained, there is no such species as LZ. Virginiella, and the supposed mine of that species proved to be the mine of Z. ¢ritenwanella. (But of that hereafter.) The mine on the uffer surface of the Haw leaves proves to be that of the Ornix above described. This mine is white, with the frass scattered, and much of it attached to the upper cuticle. It is large and nearly circular, and when completed the leaf is folded upwards. The larva never leaves the mine, but pupates in i, in a brownish- red cocoon attached to the upper cuticle. J have never seen it on any leaves except those of Crataegus tomentosa, and never on those, except in one small piece of woodland containing about ten acres, near Covington, Kentucky. There they are very abundant, and I have found multitudes of them containing larvae and pupae, and empty ones with the pupa case projecting through the upper cuticle, from May to November. J have never met with any other Ornix on the leaves of C. tomentosa. It is a very difficult species to rear, as out of at least one hundred mines that I have gathered containing the larvae and pupae, I have succeeded in rearing but two specimens of the imago. Dr. Clemens states that his O. crataegifoliclla has the labial palpi whitish ; and does not mention the annulus ; and he says that the fore- wings have a few whitish streaks in the apical part of the wing. His description is scarcely sufficient to enable one to determine a species among those which resemble each other so closely as do many species of this genus. But if he had mentioned the annulus on the palpi, and had THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 49 not confined the whitish streaks exclusively to the apical part of the wing, I should have considered caffured specimens of this species as specimens of his species, which he says also feeds on C. ¢omentosa. But ‘then the habits of his species are those of the genus generally—that is, it leaves the mine and pupates under the turned down edge of the leaf. Nor can there be any suspicion that my first surmise about the mine ‘was correct, viz., that it is a Zzthocol/etis mine, from which I have failed to ‘rear the imago; whilst I have bred an Ornix, which was unobserved in another mine onthe same leaves. For in one of the instances in which I bred it, I placed, one evening, a single Haw leaf in a wide-mouthed vial, ‘containing nothing else. ‘The leaf was carefully examined, and contained nothing but the mine and pupa of this species. The next morning the Ornix had emerged, and its pupa skin was projecting from the mine. I have, therefore, described it as a new species, notwithstanding its close resemblance to O. Cratacgifoliella, which Dr. Clemens says feeds upon the same leaves, but which I have never found on or in them. For the purpose of comparison with the preceding species, and with the one described afterwards (O. prunivorella), 1 here quote Dr. Clemens’ -description of his species. O. Crataegifoliella, Clem., Proc. Ent.. Soc. Phila., Nov., 1861, (p. 94 of Mr. Stainton’s edition.) “Labial palpi whitish. Head dark brown and gray intermixed. Antennae dark brown, faintly annulate with whitish. Forewings dark brown, with a purplish hue. Along the inner margin, from the base to ithe anal angle, whitish dusted with dark brownish. In the fold at the base is a dark brown streak, and a small blotch of the same hue beyond ‘the middle, nearly reaching to the inner margin. Toward the tip are a few whitish costal streaks, and at the apex a small round dark brown spot in a whitish patch, with a circular dark brown apical line behind it; ciliae blackish gray. Hind wings blackish gray ; ciliae rather paler. Abdomen blackish, tipped with dull yellow.” “The larva mines the leaves of Crataegus tomentosa (black thorn) in ‘September, and becomes a pupa early in’ October, weaving a reddish- brown cocoon in a turned down edge of the leaf. The pupa case is thrust from the end of the cocoon at maturity, the imago appearing early in May. There is doubtless a summer brood, but I have not sought for it. ‘The head of the larva is brown ; the body greenish-white, with the dorsum 50 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. reddish-brown.” This description of the larva suits the larvee of a great many species. O. prunivorella. NV. sp. Dark steel gray, almost brown. Labial palpi white, each joint tipped externally with dark steel gray. Antennae of the general hue, faintly annulate with whitish. Thorax and primaries dark steel gray, the primaries with about nine faint whitish costal streaks, the first near the base and the last at the apex, becoming gradually longer from the base to the apex, all faintly dark margined internally, the last three or four nearly perpendicular to the costal margin, crossing the wing avd uniting near the dorsal margin, where they are very narrow and indistinct. A small black apical spot, behind which are three dark hinder marginal lines in the ciliae, the first of which is at their base, and becomes furcate in the dorsal ciliae, the second is at the middle, and the third at the apex of the ciliae. AZ ex., ¥% inch. Kentucky. The larva mines the leaves of Apple trees (JZa/us) and Wild ‘Gheny trees (Prunus serotina), making a large tentiform mine on the under surface, which can only be distinguished from that of Lzthocolletis crataegella Clem., in the same leaves, by its larger size. It is at first a short crooked line, which ends in the large tentiform mine. It leaves the mine to pupate: under the edge of the leaf turned down. Lithocolletis crataegella, Tischeria malifoliella, Aspadisca splendoriferella, and so many larvae of larger moths feed indifferently on the leaves of Crataegus, Prunus and Malus, that I at first, when I bred this insect from Apple and Wild Cherry leaves, was inclined to suppose it to be O. crataegifoliella Clem., but a slight inspection shows it to be different, and I have never found it feeding on Haw leaves. Among other things which distinguish it from O. crataegifolicla and O. inusitatumella the posterior margin of the wings is not whitish, and it has three hinder marginal lines. in the ciliae. It may be found in all stages through the summer and fall. PERSONAL.—We are pleased to learn that Mr. Aug. R. Grote, one of our esteemed contributors, well known for his many valuable papers on Lepidoptera, has removed from Demopolis, Alabama, to Buffalo, N. Y., where he has undertaken active work in connection with the Society of Natural Science. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 5. DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN HYMENOPTERA, No. 5; BY E, T. CRESSON, Continued from Vol, 4, Page 231. Genus Micropus, Nees. Micropus imiTatus. J. sf. 2 .—Sanguineous, shining; head, antennz, prothorax, surroundings: of scutellum, pleura beneath, four anterior legs, including their coxe, posterior trochanters and their tibiz and tarsi, black ; sides of mesothorax tinged with blackish; metathorax coarsely punctured above with four longitudinal carinz, the two central ones approximate, flanks less coarsely punctured ; wings uniformly fuliginous, with the usual hyaline angular streak beneath stigma; abdomen long, narrow, polished, with a purplish reflection ; ovipositor longer than body. Length .37 inch. Massachusetts. More slender than sanctus, with the mesothorax, scutellum and sides of pleura sanguineous; the metathorax is differently sculptured and the posterior tibiz are black. MICRODUS SIMILLIMUs. J. Sp. a@ 9.—Pale sanguineous or fulvo-ferruginous ; head, antennz, the thorax, except metathorax and four anterior legs including coxe, black: metathorax opaque, scabrous ; wings fuliginous; tips of posterior tibiae and tarsi more or less fuscous ; abdomen shining, suture between first and second segments very deeply impressed. Length .22-.27 inch. New Jersey ; Pennsylvania; Illinois. Much smaller than savctwus,, which it closely resembles, and from which it is at once distinguished by the posterior trochanters not being black. Micropus cCaALcaratus. JV. sf. 9 —Sanguineous ; head, antenne, the thorax, except metathorax, four anterior legs, posterior trochanters and their tibiae and tarsi, black 3, four anterior knees, anterior tarsi except claws, intermediate tarsi except tips of joints, all the tibial spurs and apical joint of posterior tarsi, white: or whitish ; metathorax shining above, with carinae forming an elongate central area; wings fuliginous as usual; abdomen shining, second. 52 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. segment with two finely crenulated, transverse lines ; ovipositor as long as body. Length .25 inch. Delaware. Allied to sacfus, but much smaller, with the tibial spurs .and four anterior tarsi white. Microbus pivisus. JV. sp. gf .—Sanguineous ; head, antennae, pleura, metathorax, post-scutellum, four anterior legs, including coxae, posterior coxae beneath, their tro- chanters, tips of their femora, their tibiae and tarsi, black; metathorax roughly scabrous; wings fuliginous; abdomen depressed, smooth and polished, a broad, rather deep fovea on each side at base of second seg- ment. Length .34 inch. Illinois. Differs from medius, to which it is closely allied, by the color of the legs ; the metathorax is more roughly sculptured, and the clear blotch beneath the stigma more obscure, while in medius it is very con- -spicuous. Micropus aciuis. J. sf. 9 .—Small, slender, black; tip of clypeus, labrum, mandibles and palpi yellowish ; thorax shining, metathorax opaque, scabrous; wings hyaline, faintly dusky, iridescent; legs pale sanguineous, posterior tibiae yellowish, their tips, a narrow annulus near base, and their tarsi, blackish; three basal segments of abdomen pale sanguineous, remainder black, shining ; ovipositor as long as body. Length .25 inch. Massachusetts. MICRODUS DISCOLOR. JV. sf. g ¢.—Small, yellow-ferruginous ; antennz entirely black; space ‘between summit of eyes and two large spots on occiput, fuscous ; most of prothorax, sutures of mesothorax, space around scutellum, sides of pleura and metathorax above, all more or less fuscous; metathorax transversely rugulose above ; scutellum sometimes blackish, and the spots on occiput sometimes indistinct ; wings pale fuscous, areolet very minute ; legs honey yellow, most of tarsi, tips of four posterior tibiz, tips of posterior femora and an annulus near base of their tibiae, blackish ; abdomen opaque, shining beyond third segment, which is more or less fuscous; one speci men has the vertex, occiput and thorax entirely, the posterior tibiae except broad median annulus, and the first, apex of the second, and the third THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 53. segments of abdomen black. The f varies from entirely ferruginous,. except antennae and posterior tibiae, to almost entirely black. Length -14 inch. Illinois. A very variable species. MICRODUS PALLENS. J. Sf. ?.—Honey-yellow, shining ; tips of mandibles and antennae black, scape reddish beneath ; metathorax roughened, opaque, pubescent ; wings pale fuscous, areolet sub-triangular ; intermediate tarsi dusky, tips of posterior tibiae and their tarsi black ; abdomen polished. Length .22 inch. Illinois. Allied to fulvescens, Cress., with clear spot beneath stigma much less distinct. MICRODUS LATICINCTUS. J. Sf. g .—Small, black, shining; mandibles and palpi pale; metathorax scabrous; tegulae pale honey-yellow; wings hyaline, iridescent: stigma blackish ; legs honey-yellow, posterior coxae dusky at base beneath, their tibiae yellow, broadly black at tips, their tarsi fuscous; abdomen shining black, first segment longitudinally striated, second yellowish, remainder polished. Length .20 inch. Missouri. (C. V. Riley.) Micropus cinctus. W. sp. $ 2.—Small, black, shining; tip of clypeus, mandibles and palpi pale-yellowish ; antennz pale testaceous, more or less dusky toward tips, scape piceous ; metathorax opaque, finely scabrous ; tegulae pale ; wings hyaline, iridescent, faintly dusky; legs honey-yellow, tips of posterior femora above black, their tibiae yellow, black at tips, with a narrow black annulus near base, their tarsi fuscous ; coxae of $ generally entirely black, . of ¢ entirely honey-yellow; abdomen black, polished, first segment Opaque, second segment pale honey-yellow. Length .17 inch. Illinois. Smaller than /aticinctus, from which it is at once distinguished by the first abdominal segment not being striated. MICRODUS ANNULIPES. JV. sf. ? .—Small, black, shining ; clypeus, mandibles and palpi more or less pale-yellowish ; metathorax rugose, somewhat shining ; tegulae honey- yellow ; wings hyaline, iridescent, stigma and nervures pale brown; legs ay | THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. honey-yellow, anterior pair pale, posterior tibiae white, tips and a spot near base black, their tarsi black, white at base ;' abdomen polished black, second and sometimes base of third segment honey-yellow. Length -16-.18 inch. Massachusetts; Pennsylvania ; Illinois. Easily recognized by the white posterior tibiae annulated with black. It is closely allied to the two preceding species. MIcRODvUS EARINOIDES. JV. sf. ? .—Small, slender, shining black ; mouth pale piceous, palpi whitish ; metathorax rugose, sub-opaque; tegulae honey-yellow ; wings hyaline, iri- ~ descent; legs honey-yellow, posterior tarsi whitish, apex and spot near base black, their tarsi black, whitish at extreme base: abdomen black, depressed, polished, basal sutures of second and third segments sometimes pale. Length .15 inch. Massachusetts ; Illinois. Resembles Zarinus dimitaris in miniature. Genus EarINus, Wesm. EARINUS LIMITARIS. Bassus limitarsis, Say, Bost. Jour. Nat. Hist.,1., p. 250. g 2.—-Black, shining, with a short pale silky pile on face, pleura and metathorax ; mesothorax not trilobate, feebly punctured ; metathorax rounded, shining, disk with a narrow longitudinal groove ; tegulae whitish ; wings hyaline, iridescent, costal nerve and stigma black, nervures fuscous, areolet quadrate ; legs honey-yellow, posterior tibiae pale, apex broadly and a narrow annulus near base black, their tarsi entirely black ; abdomen narrow, depressed, polished, second segment with an oblique groove on each side behind which is a round swelling; sheaths of ovipositor thick, fringed with short dense black pubescence. Length .25-—.35 inch. Canada; Mass.; Penn. ; Virginia; Illinois. Common. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 55 CANONS OF SYSTEMATIC NOMENCLATURE FOR THE ~ HIGHER GROUPS. BY SAMUEL H. SCUDDER. [From THE AMERICAN JOURNAL oF ScreENcE AND Arts, Vou. III, May, 1872.] Several years ago, the American Association for the Advancement of Science appointed a committee to reconsider the canons of biological nomenclature, and to report whether, with the growth of science, they required any additions or alterations. No report has yet been made, nor, so far as we are aware, is any likely to be presented, until the subject is again brought prominently forward and new instructions given. Professor A. E. Verrill has since republished * the Revised Rules of Zoological Nomenclature adopted by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1865, and has accompanied them by a few apt comments; in England, Mr. W. F. Kirby, in a paper read before the Linnean Society of London, has called attention to the extensive changes which a strict adherence to the laws of priority would cause in the generic nomenclature of butterflies; and quite recently has put the same into practice in his catalogue of these insects. But hitherto very little has been said concerning the special application of definite rules to groups higher than genera, and it is to this division of the subject that we desire to call attention. In attempting to legislate upon this branch of zoological nomenclature, two principles must be kept in view: s?, so far as possible, the canons already in general acceptance for generic nomenclature should be applied to all the monomial groups. Unity of principle lies at the foundation of acceptable legislation ; second, retrospective laws should be avoided. One difficulty meets us at the outset,—what some are pleased to term the unstable nature of the higher groups, but which we should prefer to call the disagreement of naturalists as to the limits and value of these groups ; yet as this diversity of view is a nearly equal hindrance to any code of rules, it needs only to be mentioned in passing. Endeavoring to keep in mind the principles above enunciated, and as the simplest means of presenting our views, the following outline of a code is suggested for the consideration of zoologists. This Journal, July, 1869. 56 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Canons.—l. The name originally given by the founder of a group: should be permanently retained, to the exclusion of all subsequent syn- onyms. This rule, recognizing the law of priority, which lies at the foundation of all systematic nomenclature, is the same as the first and prime rule of the code accepted by the British Association, with the exception of certain references made exclusively to species; and, since this canon meets universal acceptance, there is no need of SCRE it, aside from the agli limitations. . This law of priority should not extend to works published before: Ly ss The same reasons for such a limitation do not exist in the present: instance as in the case of specific nomenclature ; but similar objections can be made to an earlier limitation. Only three reasonable courses are open to the naturalist: to accept (a) no limitation whatever, in which case “our zoological studies would be frittered away amid the refinements of classical learning ;” (0) the limitation here formulated, in which case all our systematic nomenclature takes its common origin in the tenth edition of Linne’s Systema Nature ;* or (c) to apply the laws of nomenclature to each kind of group (sub-family, family, class, etc.), from the time when such group was first brought into use—which would engender such con- fusion as speedily to bring all nomenclature into deserved disrepute. 2. Plural or collective substantives (or adjectives used as substantives) are alone admissible. As the higher groups are all collective—in idea, if not in fact—it is essential that the names applied to them should be at least capable of a collective sense ; and names which are not so formed should be dropped. The retrospective action of such a law would be very slight. 3. A name which has been previously proposed for some genus or higher group in zoology should be expunged. This accords too well with accepted rules to require any discussion. 4. When two authors define and name (differently) the same group, both making it of the same or very nearly the same extent, the later name (or if synchronous, the least known name) should be cancelled, and never again brought into use. * The English—the strongest upholders of the plan of dating from the twelfth edition of the Systema Naturee—are now, by degrees, accepting the earlier date of 1758 as the starting point for zoological nomenclature, and we may assume that, in this view, the whole scientific world will sooner or later concur. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 57 With the exception of certain verbal modifications, this law is identical ‘with the sixth section of the British Association rules, where it is applied to genera only. 5. In any subsequent alterations of the limits of a group, its name should never be cancelled ; but should be retained either in a restricted or an enlarged sense. . The necessity for such a limitation is obvious; otherwise a different name would (or, could) be given by every author who differed from pre- ceding ones in his ideas of the precise limitation of any group in question. This indeed has already been done, and, if continued, will create lament- able confusion; but this limitation should itself be subject to one exception, which may be formulated thus: 6. But any assemblage so defined by an author as harshly to violate the groupings of nature (as known to naturalists of his time), should be cancelled. Such a rule would prevent the injury which might accrue to science by too close an application of the preceding law. The parenthetical limita- tion seems, however, to be necessary. II. Changes in the name of one group should not affect the names of other groups. This follows as a corollary of the first canon, but it has been not infrequently violated, and it is easy to perceive the cause. The nomen- clature of higher groups, notably of families and subfamilies, has, to a considerable degree, been founded upon generic names, with the addition of special collective endings to the root (see recommendation 1). Now, when a generic name which has formed the basis of a family designation has been found to be pre-occupied, it has been thought necessary by some to recast the nomenclature of the higher group. But why? Aftera name has been long applied to a group, it ceases to have any intrinsic meaning and is simply associated with the group itself, recalling it without reference to any particular member of the same. It certainly would be agreeable if we had a nomenclature in which each group should by the very association of ideas recall its members; but since that is utterly impossible, and we have to deal with a mass of synonyms already tangled and intricate, our problem is—how best to make our way out of the difficulty without a con- tinual wrangling over names and entailing endless disputes upon future generations. 58 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. To this canon no exception whatever should be made ; for it would be difficult to draw the line anywhere and gain general consent. Anyone who considers the subject, will see that one apparently reasonable excep- tion will lead to another scarcely less desirable, until the whole value and force of the proposed canon is destroyed. III. The mere enumeration of its members, when known, is. a suffi- cient definition of the limits of a group, and gives it an unquestionable claim to recognition. Although it is certainly most desirable that every name proposed for a group should, when first propounded (or shortly after), be accompanied by a full description of its essential characters, it is evident that no one acquainted with the subject of which an author treats can fail to under- stand his meaning if he defines his groups by mere enumeration of their members. If, for instance, he designates the known genera to be embraced in a proposed family, he actually defines his group much better than he could do by a specification of its characters, since we have probably not yet been favored with any description of a natural family which gives everything which is characteristic and omits all that is not. Recommendations.—1. “‘ That assemblages of genera, termed families, should be uniformly named by adding the termination -ide to the name of the earliest known or most typically characterized genus in them; and that their subdivision, termed subfamilies, should be similarly constructed with the termination -inz.” This recommendation, formulated by the committee of the British Association, is deprived of a great part of its value by the disagreement of naturalists as to the nature of family and subfamily groups,—assem_ blages of very diverse natures having received this designation at the hands of different writers ; indeed, up to the issue of Professor Agassiz’s Essay on Classification, no one had ever attempted to give definite shape to current opinions upon the subject ; and it will be long before we shall see a general concurrence in either the views put forward in that work, or in any modification of them. Such being the case, it is evident that this recommendation cannot have the force of a law, nor be allowed any retrospective action. Otherwise these rules, or any other reasonable ones (however generally they may be accepted), are powerless to assign to any higher natural group a fixed and unalterable name ; but the group in ques- tion would receive a different name from different authors, according as they considered it a subfamily or an assemblage of still another nature. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 59 2. All monomial collective names should be derived from the Greek, and have a plural form. 3. Only the surname of the author who first proposed a group need follow its name, whether the group be used inits original or in a modified “sense ; but when it is desirable to indicate at the same time its recognized altered limits, the surname of the writer who first proposed the accepted circumscription may follow in a parenthesis. In systematic nomenclature, the object is to register titles, not to gratify pride, and the names of authors are appended for convenience, not fame ; the question of justice or injustice has no place here; and yet the above recommendation ought to be satisfactory to those who view this matter in a different light. NOTES FROM THE EAST. PIERIS RAP#.——The yellow variety of this butterfly occurs here every ‘summer, from the commencement until the end of the season; what I have seen of them were of a delicate sulphur yellow. I netted all that I met with, but never found a yellow female on the wing. In July, 1870, I had a pot of mignonette growing on my window-sill, and observed a whzte female Rape laying eggs on it. I reared seven or eight of the caterpillars, feeding them on mignonette, and they all assumed the pupa state; after the butterflies had emerged, a friend unfortunately opened the box and ‘some of them escaped before I had seen them. When I examined the box there were five yellow females remaining in it. They had the dark markings very strongly produced, as the later broods generally have ; not knowing at the time the scarceness of the yellow females, I did not preserve them, and I have not seen one since. I believe, with the exception of one reared by Mr. Bowles at Quebec, it is the only instance on record, Last spring I found some chrysalids of rage containing parasites, but did mot succeed in breeding them, as the change from the cold of the open air to the warmth of the house killed them. Last summer raf@ was very abundant here, and now the chrysalids may be seen in great numbers sus- pended to the fences about the city. The parasite has incrcased wonderfully dnring last season, for nearly all the chrysalids that I have seen this year are infested with tiem. I do not think that more than one in fifty has escaped their attacks.—F. B. CAULFIELD, Montreal, P.-Q. Macropasis Fasricit.—This beetle was very numerous here last season, and did a considerable amount of damage to the potatoe vines ; in 60 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. one field of potatoes that I examined I found on nearly every plant from two to seven of them, busily employed on the leaves ; their blue-gray dress: contrasted well with the green of the leaves, and gave them quite a picturesque appearance. When disturbed, they did not attempt to fly, but let themselves fall from the leaves ; however, when on the ground they were active enough, and soon hid themselves under stones or lumps of earth. While cn the plants they appeared to be very peaceable, keeping together in small groups, but on some occasions they are sad cannibals. A friend of mine brought me some of these insects in a paper, and when I opened it there was only one alive; the rest of them were rather badly mutilated, some had lost their legs and some were minus their heads. I put them together again and the survivor immediately commenced a fierce attack on one of his slaughtered relatives, and did not seem one bit the worse after his strange repast. DIAPHEROMERA FEMORATA.—] found this insect quite common here last summer ; they do not seem to be particular in their choice of trees in this locality. I found them on Maple, Linden, Oak and Butternut, and early in the season I found a young one making a tour of discovery on an Elm that I had sugared for moths. I found the males much more active than the females, stalking up the tree when disturbed, while the females: either remained quiet or dropped to the ground, rarely going up the tree. —F. B. CauLFIeLbD, Montreal, P. Q. ‘ HESPERIA ILLINOIS Ipenticat with HESP. ACANOOTUS, Scupp. I am informed by the best authorities that under the name of Hesp. *‘ Tllinois,” I have merely re-described Mr. Scudder’s Hesf. Acanootus, and I therefore hasten to make the necessary correction. In comparing my supposed new species with specimens and descriptions of N. A. Hesperidze, I was misled in regard to Acanootus, (which I had never seen,) by Mr. C. S. Minot’s description of that species on page 150, vol. iv, of the CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, which will be seen to differ in several important particulars from my description of what now appears to be the same species. The majority of the females taken here also differ in the spots on the primaries from the female of Acanootus, as first described by Mr. Scudder. The few extenuating circumstances mentioned above, do not, however, relieve me of the blame of having, with injudicious haste, re-described an old established species.—G. M. Donpcg, Ohio, Ill. Che Canadwn Entomologist, VOL. V. LONDON, ONT., APRIL, 1873. No. 4 NOTES ON CASNONIA LUDOVICIANA, sALLe. BY S.- V. SUMMERS, M. D., NEW ORLEANS, LA. Long, .30-.33 inch. Body elongated, glabrous, sanguineous, pilose. Head, disk of prothorax, and under surface black; head rhomboidal, middle wider than thorax, thence gradually constricted into a narrow rufous neck; eyes large and prominent; mouth parts, three basal joints, antenne and legs rufous ; eighth and ninth joints of antennae white, remaining joints black ; prothorax elongate, cylindrical, piceous; humeral base and apex rufous, widest just behind middle, when viewed vertically two fine long yellowish erect hairs will be observed to arise laterally just. before the middle, much longer than on elytra. Elytra faintly striate, striae with fine distant punctures, from each arise a single yellowish erect hair ; intervals smooth, flat, elytral constriction at humeri narrower than middle of thorax, humerus slightly elevated, angles rounded, a wide black band on middle of elytra, sinuated above, arcuate below, apex truncate and tipped with black; knees darker than femora, posterior thigh with outer two-thirds black. I am unable to detect any sexual dissimilarity. Its larger size and finer punctured striae before band on elytra, and the white eighth and ninth antennal joints, easily distinguishes it from pennsylvanica. The Californian fzcfa is unknown to me. ffabitat New Orleans, La. Mexico. Rare. This charming addition to our North American fauna appears first due to M. Salle, of Paris, France, who (if I am correctly informed) about forty years ago took a unique, near an old Saw Mill, in N. O. Subsequently, none others were known to occur until 1861, when an indi- vidual was attracted by the lamp of a Mr. Speck, which ultimately became the property of Mr. Salle, making the second specimen in all Europe. Mr. Trabranelt, a diligent collector who has resided here some eighteen 62 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. years, took the next three specimens, one of which he has lately exchanged to Mr. Salle. Again, on Dec. 31st, ’72, under some board traps in dry grass, near water, my first specimen occurred, and for three succeeding days a unique was taken. ‘Their habits are probably gregarious, living on the ground, and as the collecting grounds in the vicinity of New Orleans are limited, owing to swamps, they may be found to occur more plentifully in Northern La. They are very active and graceful, taking alarm at the least noise, and run with great rapidity, keeping the antennae in constant vibration ; when placed in a collecting bottle containing Cyanide of Potas- sium, they would seize hold of some other insect and proceed to drag it off, imitating certain species of ants. The drug, however, quickly quiets them. ' ON MR. SCUDDER’S SYSTEMATIC REVISION OF SOME OF THE AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES. BY AUG. R. GROTE., BUFFALO, N. Y. [PAPER NO. 2.] Since it is conceded that the law of priority is invariable in its applica- tion to zoological nomenclature, it remains for us to apply it to the determination of our Butterflies. That some inconveniences may arise from the correction of errors, does not militate against our desire to be right. The question is, are Mr. Scudder’s genera well founded, or, are his names entitled to precedence, not is it convenient for us to use them. Without as yet entering an extended discussion upon the structural characters of our Butterflies, we will briefly notice Mr. Scudder’s genera. 1. Oeneis, Hubner (1816.) The type and first species mentioned under this name by Hubner is Vorna. While five species are cited under this genus, Hubner refers two more to Eumenis, viz.: ae/o and tarpeja. But the type of Eumenis is £. aufonoe. It is difficult to avoid the con- clusion that we must retain Oeneis to be correct, while regretting the necessary abandonment of Chionobas, so sonorous and accustomed a name. In our North American fauna we have, besides the species cited by Mr. Scudder, Oen. chryxus and Oen. Uhleri, described under Chionobas by Doubleday and Reakirt. Chionobas Stretchiz, Edw., does not belong to Ss > ig THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 63 this genus, and is a synonym of Satyrus Ridingsii, I have been informed. Oen. nevadensis has been described by Behr. 2. Enodia, Hubner (1816). No one can possibly object to this desig- nation for our Z. port/andia on any score. 3. Minois, Hubner (1816.) This generic name has priority, and Mr. Scudder shows that it represents a distinct type. It cannot be objected to on any score. Besides mephele and alope, it includes JZ. pegala, M. ariane and M. boofis. The former is a Southern species, the Papilio pegala of Fabr., and thought to be a possible form of JZ. aloge; the two latter are described by Behr under Satyrus. 4. Argus, Scopoli (1777). Mr. Scudder restricts Scopoli’s term to our species, the /7ipparchia Boisduvalii of Harris, enumerated under another name by Scopoli. To this procedure there is no objection, provided that Boisduval’s types of Argus were not of those referred to the genus by Scopoli, which we cannot determine at the moment, when Boisduval’s restriction would have priority. Hubner has, however, a Satyrid genus Arge, the type of which is 4. psyche. 5. Megisto, Zuber (1816.) Hubner’s type is JZ. cymedia, to which he refers Eurytus as a synonym. He includes in his genus Megisto Mr. Scudder’s type of Argus. There can be objection to the use of the term if we do not follow Mr. Butler’s Enlargement of Euptychia. \ (To be Continued.) NOTES ON THE HABITS OF THE ANT LION. BY H. L. MOODY, MA#&DEN, MASS. It was in April of 1872, while at Plymouth, Mass., with a party of friends in search of the Mayflower Zfigwa repens, that I was so fortunate as to capture a specimen of the larva of this insect. It was quite by accident that it came to my hands. A friend and myself were lounging by the roadside, for want of better employment thrusting our fingers into the light sand, when with a jerk and exclamation my friend withdrew his hand to find this larva clinging with a most determined nip to a finger ; it immediately dropped to the ground, however, and so quickly buried itself ___ backward as to almost escape us, but a moment's lively digging revealed 64 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. it again, and I secured it in a pill box. On my arrival at home I provided. a jar with a few inches of dry sand in the bottom, and placed the larva in it; itat once buried itself, and though I waited several hours, hoping to witness the commencement of its pitfall, there was no movement in that direction ; there was now and then a slight stir of the sand, and once or twice the head was thrust above the surface, but quickly withdrawn at the slightest movement on my part. I grew tired of watching and retired for. the night, returning in the morning to find a completed pit. It was in the form of an inverted cone, about one and one-half inches in diameter and three-quarters deep, and as smooth as sand could be made. At the first glance I discovered no sign of the builder, but a closer inspection revealed a pair of mandibles and at the base of them a pair of eyes; the bearer of these was snugly ensconced in the sand. The mandibles were stretched te their widest capacity and resting against opposite sides of the pit, so harmonizing in color with the sand as not to be readily noticed. In this position the larva would rest for hours unless disturbed, when it would withdraw from sight, but soon reappear and resume its watch. My great interest, however, was in its method of taking its prey, and to witness this operation I provided a dozen or more ants of a small species, dropping them all into the pit at once; the larva with one sweep of its jaws secured three or four, and in a very short time killed or dis- abled them, but it soon dropped them and proceeded to kill most of the others before commencing its repast. Owing to their sluggish habit but very few succeeded in escaping. I was curious to see if the larva would attack as readily larger and more savage species, and the next day secured the largest specimens I could find of the Red Ant, Formica sanguinea ?— noted for its courage and ferocity. I dropped the largest of these on the sand in the jar, leaving it to find its way into the pit, which it soon did, hesitating a moment at the brink and then walking to the bottom. At the instant that the ant came within reach the larva closed its jaws upon one of its legs, and for a few moments I witnessed quite an exciting contest, the ant turning and twisting to find its adversary and biting savagely at everything within its reach, the larva endeavoring to draw far back into the sand, thereby protecting itself and pressing the ant so close to the surface as to allow but very little room for movement. The ant finally freed itself from the jaws of the larva, but did not at once succeed in leaving the pit ; the larva instantly almost entirely uncovered itself and slashed right and left with its mandibles, seeming to be in a perfect fury at THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 65 the loss of its prey. It also threw sand rapidly, but I could not see that the sand struck the ant except when it tried to escape up the side of the pit back of the larva; then the sand invariably struck it and brought it to the bottom. The ant finally escaped, but the next day was again caught and its juices sucked dry. In no instance did I see so much resistance offered as in this case; usually the ants seemed to realize that their adversary was one with which they could not cope. From my observations I concluded that the larva trusted rather to its long mandibles and the inability of its prey to readily climb the walls of the pit, than to sand throwing where it did not capture them in the first attempt, for I saw it throw sand in but few instances. I did not see it in the act of digging its pitfall but once ; it was then mid- night and I did not stay to witness the completion. I noticed only that it threw the sand out with its head, working very rapidly. I have some- times left the room to return in less than an hour to find a completed pit where before there was no sign of it. From the day of capture to May 11th I kept it supplied with ants, of which it destroyed numbers every day, but on the latter date, either by design or accident, its pit was filled level with the surface, and from this time to the time of pupating it dug none, remaining hidden most of the time and but once taking any food, then capturing an ant while concealed by a few grains of sand. On June 4th it constructed a round cocoon of silk, covered with grains of sand, and about one-half an inch in diameter. I presume it immediately ‘pu- i pated, but did not open the cocoon to ascertain. On July 8th the imago appeared and proved to be ALjrmeleon timmaculatus. In the larva state it is certainly in some respects the most interesting : insect I have ever seen, its very activity and pugnacity exciting admiration ; . its mandibles were always ready to close upon any intruding object. When I first obtained it I wished to preserve a description and in order to accurately observe the colors I was obliged to remove the fine grains of sand that were entangled in the short hairs on the body ; this I did with a camel’s hair brush, an operation to which the larva decidedly objected, but it stood its ground and fought it out, constantly seizing the brush between its mandibles, often in its attempts to reach it springing quite clear of the table. 66 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN HYMENOPTERA, No. 6 BY E. T. CRESSON, Continued from Page 54. Genus TOXONEURON, Say. The characters of this genus are given at length under the name of Tenthredoides (Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil., iv., p. 290), which appears to be synonymous. It may be easily recognized by the short robust body, rather large transverse head, stout legs, broad ample wings (which are. generally fuliginous), and especially by the form of the marginal cell, which is rather suddenly constricted (or somewhat reclivate) at tip of second sub-marginal cell, and thence narrowed to the apex, which is some- what incurved, and reaches the extreme apex of the wing; this, as well as the second and third submarginal cells, are indistinctly defined, the nervures being sub-obsolete. The species, thus far known, may be distinguished by the characters given in the following table:— Body entirely black. Wings entirely fuliginous. Legs black, anterior knees Cie Tibial spurs black... Sele eueaccieactacines vee sis Sie oic\e ven aeea aera ae Tibial spurs white. Pot Sole tee . 2. MINUTUM. Legs black, anterior ‘inde aad Tee ae siceaeae knees honey-=yellows.<.c.ie% Aste aisle ores 3. ORIZABA, Legs honey-yellow, coxe, trochanters, tips of posterior tibize and their tarsi. black................ 4, EXPLORATOR.. Wings hyaline, apex fuliginous. Legs entirely black......... Bate ee . 5. MEXICANUM. Legs black, anterior pair Reiderk Bae Hatey yuleg . 6. APICALE. Legs black, anterior tibiz and tarsi, base of teriedints tibiz, their tarsi and band at base of pos- terior tibize white or yellow......,.... . 7. TIBIATOR. Body black; head, pro and mesothorax and anterior Sepa ies ferruginous.......... wy scscicscecce + Oo, DHORAGGURE: Body black ; abdomen and legs flavo- ie tatees. Gee . 9. ABDOMINALE. Body ferruginous ; head, antennz, metathorax and nile bl ee .10. SEMINIGRUM. Body fulvo-ferruginous; mouth, antenne, pleura beneath and aeusaies ISCAS ea ces cosis ..-1]. VIATOR. Body yellow ; three spots on mesothorax, picts on pleura, a pe ab- domen, except base, black............ .12. ORNATUM. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 67 1. TOXONEURON A&THIOPS. JV. Sp. ? .—Black, shining, clothed rather thickly with a short whitish pubes- cence; wings fuliginous, a sub-hyaline spot beneath base of stigma, posterior wings except tips and costa, hyaline ; legs black, anterior knees bright honey-yellow, their tarsi palish. Length .25 inch. Cordova, Mexico. (Sumichrast.) 2. TOXONEURON MINUTUM. J. Sf. .—Very small, black, shining, slightly pubescent ; wings uniformly pale fuliginous, iridescent ; legs black, tibial spurs white, anterior knees, their tibiz, four anterior tarsi except tips, and intermediate knees pale yellowish. Length .to inch. Illinois. 3. TOXONEURON ORIZAB&. JW. Sf. ¢ .—Black, shining, slightly pubescent; mandibles, anterior femora except base, their tibize and intermediate knees, honey-yellow, tibial spurs black ; wings fuliginous, iridescent, posterior pair sub-hyaline ; abdomen flat, base tinged with piceous. Length .16 inch. Orizaba, Mexico. (Sumichrast.) 4. TOXONEURON EXPLORATOR. | Bracon ( Toxoneuron) explorator, Say, Bost. Jour. Nat. Hist., i, p. 259. “Indiana” (Say) ; Illinois ; Texas. The femora except base, and the tibize except apex of posterior pair, are bright honey-yellow; tibial spurs pale ; in one specimen the posterior femora and tibiz are dusky. Length -20 inch. 5. TOXONEURON MEXICANUM. JW. Sf. g 2.— Black, shining, rather thickly clothed with a short, white, sericeous pubescence ; tips of mandibles brown ; impressed lines on meso- thorax and excavation at base of scutellum, crenulated ; wings hyaline, apex beyond first cubital cell fuliginous, nervures black ; spurs of anterior tibiz pale. Length .25-.30 inch. Cordova, Mexico. (Sumichrast.) Sometimes the posterior orbits are tinged with honey-yellow, and the pubescence on anterior tibie tinged with yellow. 68 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 6. TOXONEURON APICALE. JV. sf. g.—Black, shining, clothed with a very short dull pubescence; sutures of mesothorax not crenulated ; metathorax with strongly developed elevated lines; wings hyaline, apex fuliginous, leaving base of marginal and of second cubital cells hyaline; nervures and stigma black ; legs black, anterior femora except base and their tibiz entirely, bright orange- yellow, intermediate knees slightly tinged with testaceous. Length .20 inch. Illinois. 7. TOXONEURON TIBIATOR. Bracon tibiator, Say, Long’s 2nd Exped., ii, p. 322; ( Zoxoneuron) Bost. Jour. Nat. Hist., i, p, 259. “ Pennsylvania” (Say); Illinois. A very pretty species, easily recog- nized by the white annulus at base of posterior tibiz. Length .25 inch. 8. TOXONEURON THORACICUM. WJ. spf. gf 2.—Black, shining; head, prothorax, mesothorax, spot beneath tegulae and anterior legs except coxae, trochanters and base of femora pale ferruginous ; spot on cheeks beneath, mouth, more or less of clypeus and a spot between ocelli and eyes in @, black ; wings uniformly blackish- fuliginous, nervures and stigma black ; metathorax with strongly developed elevated lines, forming an ovate central area. Length .20 inch. Cordova, Mexico. (Sumichrast.) 9g. TOXONEURON ABDOMINALE. JV. sf, ¢.—Black, clothed with a short dull pubescence ; posterior orbits, legs except coxae and trochanters, and the abdomen entirely pale san- guineous; base of first abdominal segment tinged with yellow; wings dark fuliginous, nervures and stigma black ; posterior tarsi dusky. Length .28 inch. Illinois. Bracon populator (Say, Long’s 2nd Exped., ii, p. 323), which is also referred to this genus by Say, and which, he says, is “a very com- mon insect in many parts of the United States, does not appear to be a Toxoneuron, as the ovipositor is described as being longer than the abdomen.” It is probably a true Bracon. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 69 10. TOXONEURON SEMINIGRUM. Tenthredoides seminiger, Cress., Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil., iv, p. 291, f 2. “Colorado. Colored much like Aftcrodus divisus, described in the pre- ‘ceding paper (page 52) ; the form is, however, much more robust, and the neuration of the wings entirely different. ti. TOXONEURON VIATOR. Bracon (Toxoneuron) viator, Say, Bost. Jour. Nat. Hist., i, p. 258. ‘Indiana ” (Say) ; Arizona. The specimen from Arizona has all the ‘COX, except spot on two anterior pair beneath, concolorous with remainder of legs. Length .30 inch, 12. TOXONEURON ORNATUM. W. Sf. g¢.—Lemon-yellow, shining; spot behind antennz covering ocelli, extending to summit of eyes and from thence in a narrow line to occiput which it margins, three stripes on mesothorax, the central one broad and abbreviated behind, spot on scutellum, short line beneath tegule, furcate line on pleura, Jarge spot on underside, posterior coxze beneath and a spot above at base, their femora and tibize within, spot on each side of first abdominal segment, and the remaining segments except very narrow apical + margins, black; flagellum brown; wings yellow-hyaline, apex praae nervures and stigma reddish-brown ; apex of abdomen compressed. Length .25 inch. Cordova, Mexico. (Sumichrast.) A beautiful species. Genus PROTEROPS, Wesm. = PROTEROPS CALIFORNICUS. JV. sf. ¢ ,—Black ; abdomen entirely ferruginons ; wings uniformly blackish- fuliginous ; antennz as long as body; legs entirely black, slender. Length .30 inch. California. (Behrens.) This is allied in general form to Zoxoneuron, from which it is at once separated by the anterior ocellus being situated between the insertion of the antenne. The neuration is also quite different. . 70 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. SPECIFIC NOMENCLATURE. BY H. K. MORRISON, OLD CAMBRIDGE, MASS. The publication of Mr. Scudder’s Revision has caused much dismay among amateurs, on account of the numerous specific changes and minute generic sub-divisions which it proposes. To students of Lepidoptera the novel, and in many cases, original views advanced afford a fertile field for discussion. Mr. Scudder has attempted to study the order by the same methods, and to correct its tangled specific nomenclature by the same principles which govern all other departments of Zoology. This work is rendered very difficult from the fact that their beauty and the readiness with which they can be captured and preserved, has made them from the time of Linnzeus a favorite order with collectors. Thus it was that many of the species have been described not by naturalists, but by amateurs ; and genera founded on the most casual and unimportant characters. The confusion caused by the publication of superficial and carelessly written works, or of works in which the labors of preceding Entomologists have been neglected, it will take years to undo. Mr. Kirby, in his invaluable catalogue, has combined the results of the labors of European students in this direction, and adopted, although he did not fully carry out, the principles which Mr. Scudder followed strictly in his Revision. Unless some definite law is laid down and universally observed, in regard to Entomologicalnomenclature,the Science will always remain in the chaotic condition in which it now is. Time will only increase the confusion ; and now that a good remedy has been proposed, it would be folly to reject it, because of the temporary inconvenience it would occasion. The con- demnation with which Mr. Scudder’s book has been received seems to be founded, not on an intelligent rejection of his deductions, but simply on account of the trouble which a partial change of names would cause the present generation of students. But is it not better to endure a slight and constantly diminishing evil for the sake of a future and permanent good ? There are two laws by which the nomenclature of a science may be governed, that of priority and the so-called law of convenience. The — eS r ae ‘ THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. i former is fixed, immutable, and to it every possible case of generic or specific synonymy can be referred, and at once and for ever decided. The latter is relative, changeable, differing in various countries and among Entomologists of the same country. That which is convenient to European Lepidopterists is the reverse to American. A collector has a different standard of convenience from a naturalist. To reccncile all these different opinions is impossible ; there is no rule which would be acknowledged by all. Take as an example one of our common Hesperide, Pamphila zabulon, described by Boisd. & Lec. in 1833, and found in all the European collec- tions under that name. In 1862 the same species was described in Har- ris, Ins. Mass., as Hesperia hobomok, and it is so named in most American collections. By the law of priority the matter would be at once deter- mined in favour of zabzlon. But which is the most convenient ?—zabulon evidently to European Entomologists, and obomok to American. Here is a case in which the convenience of the two parties will always be opposed, and what rule have we to decide which is right? none, unless We accept priority as our guide. Priority can be applied equally well to genera, but whether it would be advisable to change our families in accordance with it is, perhaps, doubtful, as the family name is not used in designating the ee is therefore not of so much importance. By accepting these laws as proposed by Mr. Scudder, we are under no obligation to follow him in his excessively fine generic divisions. It is the array of new names which gives his paper, at first sight, such a for- midable appearance. I would be the last one to separate such closely allied species as massasoit and zabulon, mystic and sassacus, polyxenes and trotlus, and many others which are placed in new genera. But the questions which can be raised in regard to the expediency of using large or small genera, and others of like nature, will, in time, settle themselves, if we can establish our nomenclature on a firm foundation which will never be disturbed by subsequent investigation. ‘lhis we think Mr. Scudder has done, and we hope that his work will be appre- ciated by American Lepidopterists. ver THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. —— MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 50 GRACILLARIA. If the rule holds good absolutely that the same generic name should not be used in Entomology and Botany, then Graci//aria must be dropped in one or the other. I do not know which has priority, but a name of a genus so old and well known as the Graci//aria of Micro-Lepidopterists ought scarcely to give place to an obscure genus of Cryffogamia. EIDO ALBAPALPELLA. Venillia albapalpella, ante v. 4, p. 207. Dr. Packard calls my attention to the fact, which has slipped my memory, that Venillia is preoccupied among Geometride. 1 therefore substitute £zdo for it. PSORICOPTERA GIBBOSELLA, Stainton. Adrasteia quercifoliella, ante v. 4, p. 206. When ‘ Adrasteia’ was established I knew Fsoricoptera only by name A specimen of A. guercifolella which I sent to Mr. C. V. Riley, was pro- nounced by him to be nothing else than P. gzbbosella, St. Mr. Riley states that he has bred the species from larvae feeding on Oak leaves, and that he compared his bred specimens with specimens in the collection of Mr. Stainton. He has also favored me with a generic and specific diagnosis of P. gibbosella, and I am satisfied that his identification of A. guercifoltella with it is correct. Adrasfeia must therefore give place to Psoricoptera, and the species which I have placed in the former must be removed to the latter genus. Some of the other species (ase g. D? pseud-accaciella) which I have placed provisionally in Degressaria, also approaclf very nearly to Psoricoptera, if they do not in fact belong zz it. PTEROPHORUS. P. lacteodactylus. N. sp. Creamy white. Head pale lemon yellow, except between the antennae where it is of the general creamy white hue; abdomen with a streak of pale lemon ye'low along the sides. Alar ex. 1% inch. Kentucky, in June. ae an aa allele THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 73 ADELA. A. bella. LN. sp. Vertex, upper portion of the face, palpi and a long streak on each side of the thorax under the wings brilliant golden ; lower portion of the face dark purple. @ with the basal half of the antennae dark purple, the remainder snowy white: in the ff only about the basal third is purple. Thorax above the wings and both pairs of the wings dark shining purple, the thorax and primaries with a golden gloss and appearing, according to. the light, dull brown purple, violaceous, or golden ; before the apex of the primaries are three narrow, and in some lights, indistinct fasciae, the color of which varies with the light and all of which are faintly dark margined both internally and externally ; the third fascia isat the apex. The fasciae when most distinct have a silvery lustre. Al. ex., § %inch; alittle larger. Kentucky. A fresh or living specimen of this insect is a gorgeous creature, but after death the colors become dull. JI am not acquainted with the larva. The imago may be taken in May, feeding upon the flowers of the “Climb- ing Bittersweet” (Ce/astrus scandens), and a little later it is not uncommon resting upon leaves along paths or roadways through the woods. DICTE, ge. 70V. “A Head, face as broad as the thorax ; head and face, basal joint of the antennae and first and second joints of the labial palpi clothed with long loose hair-like scales; antennae with the basal joint incrassate, stalk simple, reaching to the apex of the wings; maxillary palpi microscopic 3 labial palpi drooping (in the dead insect), the terminal joint projecting forwards and a little upward, and about two-thirds as long as the second joint. (If recurved the palpi would reach the vertex.) Tongue naked, rather longer than the thorax ; eyes globose, prominent. Wings deflexed ; anterior oblong ovate, obtusely pointed, with moderately long ciliae. The costal vein attains the margin about the middle. ‘The subcostal curves gradually into the discal, giving off a long branch before the middle, a shorter one behind the middle, then a furcate one which curves upwards to the costal margin, whilst the apical branch also curves up from its junction with the discal vein to the margin just before the apex; the discal vein closes the discal cell and sends three branches to the posterior margin ; the median is straight to the discal, where it becomes furcate, both branches attaining the posterior margin ; submedian ,simple. 7A THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Posterior wing about as wide as the anterior, sub-ovate, the apex pointed and the costal margin but slightly convex; the costal attains the margin behind the middle ; the discal cell is closed by a much curved discal vein which emits two branches to the posterior margin ; the sub- costal sends a branch to the apex from near the end of the cell and beyond the discal vein becomes furcate, both branches attaining the margin behind the apex. Median and submedian both simple, and both attain the pos- terior margin. . The roughened head and palpi and the shape and neuration of the wings ally this genus to Zevea and its congeners. D. corruscifasciella. NN. sp. Head, palpi, basal joint of the antennae, thorax and basal half of the anterior wings golden yellow ; antennae glistening snowy white, the apical half annulate with velvetty black ; just before the middle of the anterior wing, in the yellowish portion, is a brilliant metallic fascia. The central portion of the apical part of the wing is occupied by a large, nearly circular, greyish drab spot, containing four longitudinal velvetty black streaks, bordered before by a brilliant metallic costal streak which points towards the fascia ; and behind by a similar costal streak pointing towards the dorso-apical margin. The grayish drab spot is separated from the dorsal margin by a rather large triangular velvetty black patch, the apex of which touches the dorso-apical margin. This triangular streak is - dusted a little with grayish drab scales ; two metallic spots on the disc, and four dorsal spots of the same hue. Costo-apical margin and the apex brownish golden, with a bright metallic fascia interrupted in the middle, and another streak of the same hue at the extremeapex. Posterior wings purplish fuscous; under surface of both wings purplish fuscous mixed with yellowish green, and the fascia and streaks of the forewing visible through the wing. Abdomen black washed with golden, and each seg- ment margined beneath with silvery; legs black, annulate with white. Alar ex. a little over % an inch. Kentucky and No. 127, collection of Mr. Wm. Saunders, London, Ont. Rare. This is one of the prettiest and most brilliant ‘Micros’ known to me. SOLENOBIA. S. Walshella? Clem. Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila., vi, p. 132. Dr. Clemens described this species from a single specimen sent to him by the late Mr. Walsh. Mr. Walsh took the larva in the winter time THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 75 underneath the bark of Hickory trees, and suspected it of making galleries under the bark. Dr. Clemens more correctly suspected that it was lichenivorous and hoped that Mr. Walsh might ascertain its larval history. Alas! the researches of both have terminated forever. Only the male was known to Dr. Clemens, and from his description I think his specimen must have been somewhat rubbed. Male, “ Head and face dark gray. Antennae dark gray, slightly spotted with white.” Fore wings dark gray at the base, remainder paler, sprinkled irregularly with dark spots and scales. Ciliae grayish white. “ Hind wings gray.” (The quotations are from Dr. Clemens’ description.) The female is apter- ous, with the head clothed with hoary scales and a tuft of the same at the apex ; but the body is nearly naked. A/. ex. $4 inch. Kentucky. Com- mon. The larva feeds upon lichens and may be found in March and April, feeding up. It becomes a pupa in April and the imago emerges about a week thereafter. The larva is whitish, head black, upper surface of the two succeeding segments shining yellowish brown, anteriorly margined with white. The case is prismatic in outline, and of an almost leathery consistence, about % of an inch long, and tapering slightly towards each end ; it is composed of silk, sand, particles of lichens, and excrement of the larva,and I have sometimes found small Molluscous shells adheringto it. ON SOME OF OUR COMMON INSECTS. IV.—THE ISABELLA TIGER MOTH. Pyrrharctia (Spilosoma) Isabella. BY W. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONTARIO. There are but few of our readers who are not familiar with the cater- pillar of the Isabella Tiger Moth, one of our commonest “ woolly bears,” and found, we believe, in almost every part of Canada and the Northern United States. This larva, in common with many other members of the family (arctiade ) to which it belongs, hybernates during the winter. It acquires nearly full growth in the autumn, and then, having selected a cosy sheltered spot under bark, log, rail, stone or board in which to hide, it 76 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. coils itself up there into a sort of ball and sleeps through the long and dreary winter, and about the time when the birds come back and the warm days of spring begin, this bristly creature rouses itself to begin life anew. Hence it is one of the few caterpillars which present themselves to us full grown in early spring, and from its peculiar appearance can scarcely fail to attract attention. It has not to wander far for food, for, being in possession of an omnivorous appetite, it feasts on the first green thing it meets with, grass, or weed, or early plant, and having fed but a short time, it spins its cocoon and becomes a chrysalis. The caterpillar is about an inch and a quarter long; its head and body are black, and it is thickly covered with tufts of short, stiff, bristly hairs, which are dull red along the middle of the body and black at each end. When handled it immediately coils itself into a ball and remains for some time motionless. It is very tenacious of life; we have known -the larva to be frozen in a solid lump of ice, and when thawed out move around as if nothing had happened. It sometimes occurs, although very rarely, that this larva becomes a chrysalis early in the fall, and produces the moth the pose ee same season. We have never met with an instance of this but once, see CaN. ENT., vol. i, p. 26; its usual course is that which has already been partially de- scribed. Its cocoon, 4, fig. 14, is spun in some secluded nook, and is of a dark color, of an elongated oval form and curiously wrought with a network of silk, in the meshes of which are interwoven the black and red hairs from the body of the caterpillar. Within b this enclosure the insect changes to a dark brown chrysalis, and remains as such about two or three weeks, sometimes longer, when the moth having burst its shelly covering, softens the silky fibres of which its cocoon is formed by a liquid with which it is. furnished, and makes its exit through a hole at one end of the cocoon. The moth, a, fig. 14, when its wings are spread, measures about two inches. Its wings are of a pale yellowish buff colour, with a few dull THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Pas blackish dots more numerous on some specimens than on others. The hind wings are sometimes paler than the fore wings, and at other times tinged with orange red, while in other specimens we have observed that the under surface of the fore wings assumed a dull rosy hue. The body is a little deeper and richer in colour than the wings, and the abdomen is ornamented with longitudinal rows of black dots; on the upper surface there is a row down the middle of the back, and one on each side, and on the under surface there are sometimes two additional rows of smaller dots. Although this insect is so common and well known in its larval con- dition, it is not often seen on the wing. It flies at night, and being seldom attracted by lights, it rarely finds its way into our houses. It is also. pro- bably subject to the attacks of ichneumons, which destroy some of the caterpillars before they reach maturity. ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOME GENERA OF CANADIAN INSECTS. BY FRANCIS WALKER, LONDON, ENGLAND. Before leaving the Canadian Chacidiz, in hope of returning to Con when many more genera are discovered in Canada, I will mention A/egas- Zigmus, which very probably occurs there ; it is 2 genus of Zorymide, and, in some respects, connects that family with the Eurytomide, and is next to the latter in the interest with which it may be regarded in case there is a foundation for the report lately published concerning the seed-eating habits of the species which represent it in California. But this does not seem probable, as it is certainly carnivorous in Europe, where two species exceed the others in beauty and are especially conspicuous, the great 4 giganteus that maintains itself on the Cynips of a one-chambered gall in the Mediterranean region, and JZ. dorsalis that, with various other species, lives on the substance of the Cywigs of the many-chambered Oak Apple of North Europe. I have seen other species near London and in the Alpine vallies of Switzerland, and they are attractive on account of their comparative rarity, though their economy is but little known. The natural history of the Australian species may be unknown for some time to come, and I hope that its discovery will be preceded by attention to the Canadian galls and to their parasitic inhabitants. 78 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. SrrEx.—This genus is well known by the large size of the few species that have been discovered and by its especial habitation in the North. I have mentioned elsewhere its occurrence in Eastern Siberia, which may have been the earlier habitation of the European species, and wherein some of the North American species also dwell, such as S. gigas, S. albicornis, S. zuveneus, S. spectrum and S. flavicernis. S. juveneus has appeared as far south as Algeria, and 5S. cedrorum is contemporaneous with the cedars on Mt. Lebanon. SS. varipes and S. dimidiatus inhabit North America, and there are three apparently undescribed species from that region and one of small size from Mexico. There are two in North iindostan and one in Australia, and three or four whose native country is unknown to me. It does not appear that distance in space between two species is accompanied by seat iding difference in character, for the Australian species is very nearly allied to S. juveneus. In the neigh- bouring genus, 7remex, the European ce juxicernis is represented in North America by J. columba, and there are three undescribed species, one of North America, one of Hindostan, and one of China. + herd NOTES ON COLLECTING. BY THEODORE L. MEAD, NEW YORK. Last season, while in the Catskill Mountains, I made some experiments - in sugaring for moths, which may be oe to collectors. The sugaring mixture employed was “ molasses sugar” and water, in the proportion of three or four een to the gallon; I could not per- ceive that other additions, such as alcohol or preserved fruit, &c., were of any advantage. About twenty trees in an orchard were sugared, but very few moths were seen for the first night or two, though as afterwards they came in immense numbers, it would seem that a little time is required for the news to spread. aving found a cyanide poison-bottle to be very useful in killing small Diurnals, and noticing the almost universal habit of these moths, when disturbed, of darting downward before flying away, it occurred to me to make a poison-bottle on a large scale and to dispense with a net, always SO inconvenient to use at night. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 79 Accordingly I procured a quart bottle with as wide a mouth as pos- sible—a fruit jar would have done very well—put in it enough lumps of common fused cyanide of potassium to cover the bottom, and having poured upon this about an inch of plaster of Paris mixed with plenty of water, I had only to await nightfall to commence operations. The large poison-bottle worked to a charm; scarcely a moth escaped which I desired to take. With the new instrument I became impatient of the time required to take out and pin each specimen as soon as stupefied, and tried the experiment of capturing every uninjured moth seen and allowing them to remain in a layer upon the plaster until it was convenient to return to the house and sort them over, taking a moderate amount of care that they should not be unnecessarily shaken up in carrying. Rather unexpectedly I found that this treatment did not seem to injure or rub the specimens in the least degree, though sometimes nearly a hundred moths of all sorts and sizes would be piled together, making a stratum an inch or two thick in the bottle. After this discovery night collecting became easy, nets and boxes were left at home, and the only necessary articles were a lantern and the poison- bottle. Arrived at a tree and carefully turning the light upon the sugared patch, I selected out such moths as seemed desirable, and, removing aye stopper, gently touched them from below with the open bottle. When they had flown down into the receptacle, the cork was replaced and the specimens were thus safely disposed of till the following morning, when they could be sorted over at leisure. Occasionally a very wary moth would fly away at the first approach of artificial light, and I endeavored with laudanum and hydrate of chloral to so stupefy them that they could be readily taken. The laudanum was rather too effective, seeming to intoxicate them; at any rate, after imbibing the mixture, the moths fell off the tree and sprawled around in the grass in a very absurd manner, quite unable to fly away ; but still most of them managed to go a considerable distance, and so were lost in the grass. The hydrate of chloral had no effect whatever upon them ; some moths which took a considerable quantity of a very concentrated solution—about equal bulks of the salt and of water—remained unaffected. Sometimes ants were troublesome, biting the trunks of the moths as they fed, and causing them to fly away. In these cases a dose of laudanum was generally effective in driving off the ants for a considerable time. 80 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Strips of white cloth nailed upon the trees were very convenient to receive the sugar, though not necessary. One afternoon, while preparing my baits for evening, a fine Grafta Interrogationis hovered around the tree for a moment and then lit close by, and unrolling its proboscis, feasted on the nectar. While engaged in this absorbing operation I readily cap- tured it between thumb and finger. In some localities where rare species are to be found, it may be worth while to try sugaring for butterflies as well as moths. The vapor of hydrocyanic acid in the poison-bottle, as a rule, did not. change the colors of specimens even after prolonged exposure. But a single moth of those collected, a pinkish Crambus, was faded by it, changing to olive brown. At my suggestion cyanide of potassium was adopted by the American Museum of Natural History, to preserve their Entomological collections from the ravages of insects. At first small tin boxes were used, but the ‘salt chrystallized upon the tin and made its way over the edge and down the sides of the receptacle, staining the cabinet drawers. Finally small glass capsules were used to contain the poison, and proved satisfactory. The vapors render it unpleasant to work over the drawers while the cap- sules are in them, but with the temporary removal of these the inconvenience ceases. A fly or other small insect introduced into one of the cases, dies in a very short time, and the protection against Dermestes is very complete, though of course it is hardly advisable to use this method where the drawers are not nearly air-tight. Still I think that every Ento- mologist would find a single tight receptacle thus poisoned very useful as a sort of quarantine for suspected specimens. Even delicate green Geometrae, after being in an atmosphere of prussic acid vapor for months, have, so far, shown no change in color. Tue South London Entomological Society, which, though only nine months old, has been extremely successful, held on Thursday evening last, at Dunn’s Institute, Newington Causeway, a very interesting exhibition of collections of insects, chiefly British Lepidoptera. The collections were made by the members themselves, all amateurs, and do them the greatest credit. The rcom was densely crowded, and the exhibition was a great success, Che Canadtan Entomologist. VOL. V. LONDON, ONT., MAY, 1873. No. 5 HYPENA SCABRA (Fasr.) AND H. ERECTALIS, Guevn. BY J. A. LINTNER, ALBANY, N. Y. In the examination of my last season’s collections of AZypena scabra (scabralis, Guen.,) and “ H erectalis,” for sexual determinations, I was surprised to find of the former, only the male represented, and of the latter, only the female. Collections of each having been made during the same period of time (from September 1st to September 24th) and at the same place (the wall and ceiling of the piazza of my residence)—such a remarkable occurrence seemed to be so removed from accident, and inexplicable from any difference of sexual habits, that I was led to suspect the identity of the two species. On referring to my cabinet, I tkere found individuals labelled as and 2 of each species ; but, on a critical review of these determinations by an infallible method of distinguishing sex in the Heterocera, viz., the structure of the /renu/um (simple in the male and compound in the female), my “‘ 2 ” scabra proved to bea ff, and my “ ¢” erectalisa 9. Among my duplicates of the collections of several years, the same result obtained. Mentioning these facts to my friend, Mr. Meske, of this city, he was quite positive of having in his cabinet the sexes of each species, but he subsequently found that a frenulum inspection of all his examples gave him only one sex of each form. There was, therefore, no longer room for doubt of the identity of the “‘ two species ”—that “ erectalis” is only the female (though uniformly smaller) of scabra. It is interesting, in connection with the above, to notice that Guenee,. in his description of scabralts, refers to seven #’s under his observation, and says, ‘ Je ne connais pas la 2.” Of erectalis he says, ‘3 f,1 3.” Mr. Grote (Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., iv, p. 102) cites J and 2 of erectalis 82 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. and scabra. The varying form of the abdomen of scabra—each sex often assuming the form pertaining to the other—may have easily led him into this error,as ithad done with me in those which I had placed in my cabinet. A strong testimony to the value of the investigations in which the eminent German Lepidopterist, Dr. Speyer, is at present engaged, in his examination and comparison of the identical or closely allied forms of European and American Heterocera, is given in the fact, that from the study of a small number of scabra and erectalis submitted to him (perhaps three of each form), he was led to believe that the two would prove to be but one species. This opinion was recently communicated by him in a letter to Mr. Meske. Before its reception, the conclusion, confirming his belief, to which I had arrived, through an examination of abundant material, had been forwarded to him. There seems to be no sufficient reason at present for changing the scabra of Fabr. into the scabralis of Guenee—the true relations of the Deltoidz, whether to the Noctuas or to the Pyralites, being still a matter of opinion and discussion. I embrace the present opportunity to communicate the fact, that an example of Defressaria Ontariella Bethune, sent by me last fall to Dr. Speyer, and by him submitted to Zeller, was by the latter determined to be D. heracliana Deg. The opinion of Mr. Angus, recorded in vol. a, p. 19 of this Journal, that it was probably identical with the above named European species, is hereby confirmed. DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN HYMENOPTERA, No. 7 BY E. T. CRESSON, PHILADELPHIA, PENN. Continued from Page 54. Genus HELcon, Nees. Posterior femora toothed beneath near apex. Body entirely black, legs ferruginous.............20eeee008: 1. OCCIDENTALIS. Body black and ferruginous. Abdomen black, with broad median ferruginous band...2. BOREALIS. Abdomen entirely ferruginous. Metathorax and pleura more or less ferruginous ; posberiok ‘tarsy. white. . 2%. 0.03. oeleshene 3. ALBITARSIS. Metathorax and pleura black ; posterior tarsi black.4. FRIGIDUS THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 83 Posterior femora simple. Body entirely black. Legs entirely honey-yellow or ferruginous. Wings hyaline; first abdominal segment narrow, SLUINITI Oy fas etatoxcte/aieie eisie’se sieve F Horeeacoee g: 5. AMERICANUS. Wings fuliginous ; first abdominal segment broad, DEUS foi ahs opel onaneteie.'s ae ereh cel cia ei ela a. 0' ss) olohviete 6. FULVIPES. Legs ferruginous, posterior femora, tibize and tarsi black.7. PEDALIS. 1. HELCON OCCIDENTALIS. Heleon occidentalis, Cress., Proc. Ent. Soc., iv, p. 292. @. Colorado. 2. HELCON BOREALIS. J. sf. g¢ .—Black, opaque ; clothed with a short thin pale pubescence; top of head, cheeks and space on side of pleura smooth and shining, face finely and densely punctured ; antennz long, slender, brown; thorax densely, rather roughly sculptured, somewhat coriaceous ; metathorax densely and coarsely sculptured ; teguiz dull honey-yellow ; wings hya- line, iridescent, nervures and stigma fuscous ; legs bright honey-yellow, anterior coxee tinged with fuscous, posterior tibiz black, reddish at Jase, their tarsi pale yellow, dusky at tips, femoral tooth strong and “blunt; abdomen depressed, first segment coriaceous, second and third segments honey-yellow. Length .33 inch. Maine. 3. HELCON ALBITARSIS. JV. sf. g .—Head, pro and mesothorax, scutellum and sometimes the pleura entirely black; remainder honey-yellow or ferruginous; sometimes the pleura is entirely ferruginous, and sometimes the metathorax is obscurely ferruginous, nearly brown; antenne black or brown; head and thorax sculptured as in Jorea/is, the metathorax being more distinctly reticulated ; tegulae honey-yellow; wings hyaline, iridescent, nervures and stigma fus- cous ; legs bright honey-yellow, posterior tibize black, reddish at base, all the tarsi white, dusky at tips, femoral tooth acute; abdomen narrow, shining, first and second segments reticulated ; apical segments sometimes tinged with dusky. Length .27—.35 inch. 84 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Virginia; Illinois. This may be the male of dentzfes, Brulle, the female of which is described as having a white annulus on antenna, and the tarsi are not conspicuously white as in a/bitarsis. 4. HeELcon Fricipus. JV. sp. .—Black, shining ; face rough ; antennz slender, black ; prothorax except posterior angles, semi-circular band on pleura, disk of meso- thorax and basal excavation of scutellum, covered with coarse striz or reticulations ; metathorax coarsely reticulated; tegule piceous ; wings smoky hyaline, nervures and stigma black; legs, including coxe, rufo- ferruginous, tarsi tinged with yellowish, posterior tibize blackish, femoral tooth strong and very blunt; abdomen longer than thorax, narrow, polished, ferruginous, dusky at base, first segment with two longitudinal ridges and a stout blunt tubercle on each side near base; ovipositor longer than body, honey-yellow, sheaths black. Length .45—.50 inch. Hudson’s Bay ; Vancouvers’ Island (Henry Edwards.) 5. HELCON AMERICANUS. J. Sp. °.—Black, shining; face roughened; prothorax and metathorax reticulated ; labrum and mandibles except tips ferruginous; palpi pale yellowish ; antennae long and slender, brown-black, base honey-yellow ; middle lobe of mesothorax prominent, divided from the side lobes by a deep groove which become confluent behind; tegulae and base of wings honey-yellow ; wings hyaline, sub-iridescent, nervures and stigma black ; legs honey-yellow, posterior tibiae and tarsi more- or less dusky, femora simple; abdomen long, slender, shining, sides and base of second and third segments tinged more or less with testaceous, first segment long, narrow, grooved medially ; venter more or less tinged with testaceous ;. ovipositor very long and slender. Length .55-.60 inch. Canada; Virginia. Very distinct from /ilvifes by the shape and sculpture of the first abdominal segment. 6. HELCON FULVIPES. Helcon fulvifes, Cress., Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil., iv, p. 292. ¢. Colorado. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 85 7. HELCON PEDALIS. WJ. Spf. ft 9.—Same form and sculpture as fu/vifes, from which it differs by the posterior femora except base, and their tibiae and tarsi being black. Length .40-.48 inch. Hudson’s Bay ; Massachusetts. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. Continued from Page 50. TINEA. XZ. T. eunitarieedla. WN. sp. Black ; head and face rufous ; palpi grayish white; antennae yellowish - gray, annulate with black, tips white; wings black, with a costal and dorsal white spot opposite each other just before the middle (sometimes united, forming a fascia), a white fascia (sometimes interrupted) beyond the middle, a costal white spot in the apical portion of the wing, and pear the apex an obliquely curved costal white streak ; apical soon the wing bronzy, iridescent, ciliae grayish brown; legs silvery white, in parts tinged with fuscous ; posterior wing fuscous. A/ar ex. less than % of an inch. The larva is found upon old stone walls and monuments in cemeteries. I do not know whether it feeds upen the hairs contained in the mortar of the walls or upon the mortar itself, or upon Lichens, but upon the wall where I have found it most abundantly, I have never found a trace of Lichens. The case is composed of silk and grains of lime. It is flat tened, with the under surface truncate at each end, and the upper surface projects in shape something like the bowl of a spoon at each end; the sides are emarginate near each end. I have lost my notes upon the larva. Hab. Kentucky and the Gulf States. It is one of the handsomest 7inee known to me. 2. TZ. Orleansella. LN. sp. Straw color or pale yellowish, thickly dusted with fuscous; a discal fuscous spot about the middle of the wing, and another opposite to it on 86 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. the dorsal margin; a row of dark brown spots around the apex, a dark brown spot on the base of the costa and an obscure one at the inner angle: the apical portion of the wing is thickly dusted. Antennae gray- ish stramineous : head and palpi sordid stramineous, the outer surface of the palpi brown. Alar ex. 34 inch. New Orleans, La., in November. 3. T. auristrigela. WN. sp. Head and antennae straw color or pale golden, palpi silvery; thorax and wings brown in some lights, bright purple, roseate or violaceous, with a wide shining straw colored or pale golden streak upon the fold, beginning at the base of the costa and extending to and into the beginning of the dorsal ciliae, and sometimes connected with a large straw colored or pale golden costal spot before the costal ciliae; ciliae pale golden Alar ex. ¥% inch. Kentucky, in July. 4. T. straminiella. WN. sp. Head sordid yellowish; palpi, antennae, thorax and anterior wings straw color, palpi brownish externally ; sides of the thorax behind the eyes brown; a row of small brown spots along the fold, another at the end of the disk. Apex dusted with brown. Vatu continues to be as well filled as ever with most interesting and instructive matter; recent numbers have contained seasonable articles upon the Comet and the Transit of Venus, and a series of illustrated papers upon the observatories of the United States. European potato growers are beginning to become alarmed at the prospect of a speedy invasion of their fields by the devastating Colorado Beetle. As it has now very nearly reached the Atlantic seaboard, we have little doubt that in another year or two it will succeed in crossing the ocean and striking terror into the hearts of - all patriotic Irishmen. Mr. Newman, in a recent number of his “ Ento- mologist,” while he confuses the sweet potato with the ordinary potato, and the insects that prey upon these very different plants, expresses his disbelief in the prospect of trouble from any of our American pests. He goes on, however, to quote all the remedies against the Colorado beetle contained in the Report of our Society—without acknowledgement ! WE REGRET to announce the death of Mr. Geo. R. Crotch, M. A.. of St. John’s College, Cambridge, who sailed from England to America in 1872 for the purpose of studying the Entomology of parts which he considered incompletely known. He made collections, especially of - Coleoptera, in California, Vancouver’s Island, Oregon and other Districts. So much were his labors valued in England that his University on two occasions voted him a sum of money to aid him in the formation of collections for the Museum at Cambridge. THE 23RD Meeting of the American Association is to take place this. month at Hartford, Conn., beginning on August 12th. Dr. LeConte is the President elect. As an invitation was extended at the Portland meeting to the members of the Entomological Society of Canada to be present on this occasion, we trust that many of our friends will make a point of attending; there will no doubt be a large attendance of insect hunters from all parts of the continent. THE 44TH Meeting of the British Association is to be held at Belfast, under the Presidency of Prof. Tyndall. It is to commence a week later than that at Hartford. Cayo ars. — Che Canadian Entomologist. VOL. VI. LONDON, ONT., SEPTEMBER, 1874. No. 9 THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION. At the recent gathering of this scientific body, in Hartford, Conn., there were brought together an unusual number of Entomologists. This was owing partly, no doubt, to the kind invitation extended by the Association to the American and Canadian Entomological Societies, to appoint special meetings of their members to be held at that time and place, with the view of having these important Societies fully represented. In response to this invitation, a number of members of the American Entomological Society were present, while our Canadian Entomologists were represented by the worthy President of our Society, Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, M. A., and the Editor of the Enromo.ocisr. Several evenings were occupied by these “ brethren of the net” in interesting and profit. able discussions on the habits and peculiarities of various insects, the time passing so pleasantly that the midnight hours were reached ere a separation could be effected. After mature deliberation it was resolved to organize under the name of ‘The Entomological Club of the A. A- A. S,” and the following constitution was adopted : TITLE. I. The name of the association shall be “ The Entomological Club of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.” OBJECTS. II. The annual reunion of the Entomologists of America, the advancement of entomology, and the consideration of all general questions. relating to the science that may from time to time arise. MEMBERSHIP. III. All members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science who are interested in Entomology, shall épse facto be members. of the club. 162 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. OFFICERS. IV. The officers of the club shall be a President, a Vice-President,and a Secretary, to be elected annually by vote of the members. DUTIES OF THE OFFICERS. V. The President, or in his absence,the Vice-President, shall preside at all meetings ; the Secretary shall perform all the usual duties of a recording and corresponding secretary. MEETINGS. VI. A meeting shall be held in each year at the place of meeting appointed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science ; it shall commence at 2:30 p. m.on the day before the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and be continued throughout that evening ; further meetings may be heldas time will permit during the week following. The following resolutions were also unanimously passed : Resolved, That the members of the American Entomological Society and the Entomological Society of Ontario, together with all other persons interested in entomological science, be cordially invited to attend and take * part in the proceedings. Resolved, That the secretary be requested to publish notices of the meeting in such periodicals devoted to natural history, and especially in those devoted to entomology as are published on the continent; and further, that the members be requested to bring with them at the annual reunions specimens for exchange and exhibition, and especially types of species that they may have described during the year. Ata subsequent meeting of the Club, the following officers were elected: President, Dr. John L. LeConte, Philadelphia, Pa.; Vice Presi- dent, Samuel H. Scudder, Cambridge, Mass.; Secretary, Chas. V. Riley, St. Louis, Mo. We feel sure that under such able direction, the Entomo- logical Club of the A. A. A. S. will prosper, and be the means of stimulating many to increased effort, and thus greatly advance the interests of our favorite study. As it may interest many to know who werc present at these meetings, we furnish the following list: Dr. John L. LeConte, Philadelphia, Pa.; Dr. J. G. Morris, Baltimore, Md.; Prof. S. S. Haldeman, Chickis, Pa, ; Dr. H. A. Hagen, Cambridge, Mass.; S. H. Scudder, Cambridge, Mass. ; THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 163 A. R. Grote, Buffalo, N. Y.; Dr. G. M. Levette, Indianapolis, Ind.; C. V. Riley, St. Louis, Mo.; O. S. Westcott, Chicago, Ill.; J. A. Lintner, Albany, N. Y.; H. F. Bassett, Waterbury, Conn. ; George Dimmock, Springfield, Mass.; B. Pickman Mann, Cambridge, Mass.; E. P. Austin, Cambridge, Mass.; Dr. R. King, Kalamazoo, Mich.; Chas. P. Dodge, Washington, D. C.; Mr. Patton, Waterbury, Conn.; Rev. C.J.S. Bethune, M. A., Port Hope, Ont.; W. Saunders, London, Ont. During the meetings of the Association several interesting and valuable papers on Entomological subjects were read by Dr. LeConte and Messrs. Scudder, Riley and Grote. THE LINNEAN SIGNIFICATION OF THE GENERIC TERM PAPILIO. BY H. HAGEN, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. In a recent issue of the CANADIAN EnTomotocist, No. vill, Vol. vi, there appears from the pen of Mr. Scudder a paper on “The Linnean Signification of the Generic Term Papilio,” containing some statements on which I propose to offer a few remarks. The data given by Scudder from Linné’s works are—save some minor typographical errors—correct, excepting in two important points. On p. 144 he says “in*the year 1846 the first edition of the Fauna Suecica was published, x which Linne for the first time treats of spectes, giving to them names in the language of the country.” (The italics are mine.) In the first place, Linné did never give either to animals or insects names in the language of his country. This is important in view of Mr. Scudder’s proposition in “Psyche” to give such names for the convenience of non- entomologists. The names quoted by Scudder, viz.,morio, polychloros, &c., are never given by Linnéas zames of the species, but just at the end of the synonyms, quoted as synonyms, always in this form, vu/go morio. These names were zever invented by Linné, but were used by former naturalists ; some are to be found in Petiyer’s Museum, viz., Oculus pavonis (not Oculis), Bella Donna, Ammiralis (the Admiral) Argus, in Rajus Hist. Ins. and in Albin. Engl. Insects, Brassicaria, Urticaria, ete.—the others in different other authors. Even Linné used some of them before, in his Elenchus, viz., Bella Donna, Oculus pavonis, and always in this manner: 164 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Bella Donna dictus, Oculus pavonis dictus, showing clearly that the names. were not given by himself. Such names as are quoted with vu/go are not numerous, although in much larger proportion in Lepidoptera than in any other order. I find 25 such among 37 Papilio, and 14 Phalene only among the 114! described; in other orders the proportion is much less. There is notin the whole Fauna Suecica one name given by Linne. In the rare cases where Linne quotes Swedish names he has never given these himself, but quoted them as synonyms, as in Phal. mori. Vulgo Bombyx. Suecis Silkesmask. In the end of the last and in the beginning of the present century there was a general tendency to give to every insect a name in the language of the country in which it was found. In this work labored Donovan for England, Fourcroy and Geoffroy for France, Sepp for Holland, Isert for Sweden, Bruennich for Denmark, Panzer and Sturm for Germany; but very soon it was seen that this business was a difficult one, often the names. were not appropriate, some were foolish, and others even ridiculous,. while it was apparent to all that such names, instead of being a benefit to science, were only a burden, and soon the matter was dropped entirely. Even in the case of injurious insects it is seldom necessary to invent. common names, for where species are really destructive the people almost always have a name for such just at hand. With regard to the second point in the paragraph quoted, Linne treats of species first ina paper published in 1736,in Acta literaria et Scientiarum Sueciz Upsala, ‘I. iv, p. 97-138, Animalia per Sueciam observata. This paper is reprinted Lugduni Batav. 1743 in 8vo., Blenchus animalium per Sueciam observatorum, p. 37-94. Jainne himself quotes this paper later always “ Acta Upsal, 1736,” and states in the preface of Fauna Suecica, ist edition, “‘ quum ad patriam Academiam Upsaliensem 1729 degerem, conquirendis insectis primam dedi operam,nec prius destiti, quam visendz mihi essent 1735 aestive regiones. Eorum que reperi, catalogum a me exhibitum. Regia Scient. Soc. Upsal. actis suis pro anno 1736 inseruit.’”"* * When I studied in 1729 at my native Academy of Upsala, I collected chietly insects, nor did I desist until I started to visit other countries in 1735. Of those which I found, the Royal Scientific Society of Upsala published in their proceedings for the year 1736 a catalogue prepared by me. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 165 The Elenchus (just as the first edition of the Fauna Suecica) has xo names of the species (I say purposely so, as Linne called NOMINA TRIVIALIA what to-day is called sPECIES NAME, and Linne called NOMEN -SPECIFICUM what to-day is called p1AGNosIs) but always a diagnosis, and where it was possible, quotations of former authors, viz., Petiver Museum .and Gazophylacium, Rajus, Albin, &c. The species given in the Elenchus -are just as easily recognized as those in the Fauna Suecica, Ed. 1, by “comparing the quoted authors and the diagnosis. It follows, therefore, that if the first edition of the Fauna be recognized to have nght of ipriority, the Elenchus must be recognized to have the same right. Now, the genus Papilio is established in Syst. Nat. Ed. 1, 1735. The Elenchus és the first publication with species (1736) after it, and the first Papilio is P. Rhamni, quoted as Papilio sulphureus Petiv. Mus. 1. Com- paring Petiver’s words and Linne’s Fauna Suec., Ed. 1, No. 795, the identity of this Papilio sulphureus with P. Rhamni is sure. I give here the list of the species of the Elenchus and of the first edition of the Fauna Suec., i and ii : Llenchus. Faun. Suec., Ed. i. Ed. it. 1. Rhamni mas. 1. Antiopa. 1. Machaon. 2. Rhamni fem. 2. Polychloros. 2. Apollo. _3-\ Brassice. 3. Urtice. 3. Mnemosyne. 4. Rape. 4. C. album. 4. Crateegi. igoy Nap. S>.» kOe 5. Brassice. 6. Crategi. 6. Atalanta. 6. Rape. 7. Apollo. 7. Cardui & foliow 7. Napi & follow 24. Rhamni. 12. Rhamni. ro. Antiopa. 25. Crateegi. 21. Antiopa. 11. Polychloros. 26. Napi. 22. Polychloros. 12. Urtice. 27. Rape. 23. Urtice. 13. C. album. 28. Brassice. 24. C.album. 14. lo. 31. Apollo. 25. Atalanta. Follow ; Linne first (1736) places P. Rhamni at the head of the genus Papilio ; second, 1746-48 (the later editions until 1756 are only reprints) P. antiopa at the head, and third, 1758, and following, the swallow-tails -at the head, beginning with P. priamus in Ed. x, Syst. Nat., and with P, ‘machaon in Ed. 4, Fauna Suecica. In the Fundamenta Entomologiz, 1767, 4to p. 32, Linne speaks -about the division of Papilio into five classes, devoting more than a page 166 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. to this subject, and says strictly that his Zguétes form the first class, Heliconit the second, Danaii the third, Mymphales the fourth, Plebett the- fifth. The closing lines in Mr. Scudder’s paper should therefore be amended’ so as to read thus: ‘‘In Linne’s mind which was a typical Papilio—. Rhamni, or Antiopa, or Machaon? ‘The answer is simply that Linne in his study arrived at the conclusion that the first class of his. Papilio should be formed by the Equites. I would remark, however, that Linne never speaks, as far as I know, of any particular species being the type of its class, and this idea that his first species is the type is of very recent date. The fact that so few Entomologists have the opportunity of consulting, Linne’s older works, induced me to publish these statements. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. (Continued from page 153.) ANTISPILA. A. cornifoliella ?. Clem. Can there be two Antispila miners of the Dog-wood? Either there- must be, and my specimens are specifically distinct from this species, or Dr. Clemens’ description is strangely erroneous in at least one particular,. viz., the color of the fascia and streaks, which he says are golden in: cornifoliella, but which are silvery white in my specimens, all of which— six in uumber—agree exactly in ornamentation, and all but one of which are bred specimens. The species of the genus generally resemble each, other very closely, and some recognized species do not differ from each other more than my specimens do from Dr. Clemens’ description. Neither: is it improbable that two species mine the leaves of the Dogwood, for the same thing occurs in Europe, where 4. Pfeiferella and A. Treitschkiella both mine the leaves of Cornus sanguinea. A. cornifoliella and my specimens both mine the leaves of Cornus florida. I subjoin Dr.. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 167 Clemens’ description for the purpose of comparison with my own specimens : “ Head, face, labial palpi and fore feet dark brown. Antennae dark brown ; basal joint somewhat ochreous. Forewings rather dull dark brown, with a coppery hue. Near the base is a rather narrow, golden band, ot constricted on the fold, and rather indistinct toward the costa. where it is somewhat suffused with a coppery hue, and nearest the base on the inner margin. At the apical third of the wing is a small golden spot, and nearly opposite, on the inner margin, another of the same hue, with the hinder portion of the wing tinged with a bright reddish coppery hue ; ciliae dark grayish. Hind wings purplish brown; ciliae somewhat paler, with a coppery hue.” The italics are Dr. Clemens’. The following description is drawn from the six bred specimens above mentioned : Head and face dark brown or brilliant metallic, according to the light ; labial palpi yellowish white; tarsi all yellowish white, with each joint: tipped with dark brown on its anterior margin. Antennae dark brown, with the two or three joints nearest the base ochreous, and the extreme tip white. Fore wings and thorax dark brown, blackish, bronzed or tinged with purple, according to the light; before the middle of the wing is a slightly curved fascia, which is widest and nearest to the base on the dorsal margin, vot constricted on the fold, but quite distinct throughout. A costal and dorsal streak just before the ciliae, the costal streak a little behind the dorsal one. In fresh specimens this fascia and these streaks are silvery white ; in old specimens they have a faint golden hue in some lights. (Clemens describes them as golden.) Basal half of the cilie purplish ; apical half grayish silvery. Al. ex. scarcely Y% inch. Dr. Clemens suggests that cornifoliclla may be a variety of his Nyse foliella. J have never succeeded in breeding the latter species. A. tsabella, Clem. I find nearly the same differences between my specimens (bred) of this and Dr. Clemens’ description, that I have noted above as to corni- foliella. Dr. Clemens says that the fore wings have no greenish or violet reflections, which is certainly incorrect. The fascia is wider than in cornifoliella, the thorax more shining metallic, the purple hinder marginal line is less distinct, and the entire wing is less purplish, and the species is a little larger. Nevertheless, they resemble each other very closely. The 168 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, costal and dorsal spots in both are of nearly equal size, or the costal one is a little the largest. A. viticordifoliella. N. sp? Dr. Clemens mentions a mine and larva in grape leaves to which he gives this name, but he was not acquainted with the imago. Though it sometimes happens that more than one species of a genus mines leaves of the same plant, and it is therefore possible that the species described below may not be the same referred to by Clemens, yet from his descrip- tion of the mine and larva, I feel confident that it is, and have therefore given it the name suggested by him. Dark brown, inclining to blue black, with a purplish tinge in some lights, and in some lights bronzy brown or greenish ;_ thorax and base of the wings with pink, purple or topaz red reflections, according to the light. A nearly straight silvery white fascia before the middle of the wings, not constricted on the fold, widest on the dorsal margin, where it is also a little nearer to the base ; a large triangular silvery white dorsal streak just before the beginning of the ciliae, and a smaller one at the beginning of the costal ciliae. Ciliae white. Tarsi yellowish white, each joint tipped in front with dark brown. Face yellowish white; antennae dark brown, with about six terminal joints silvery white, and the six preceding ones alternately white and dark brown. It is a little smaller than 4. cornifoliella. The mine, larva and case are smaller than those of A. isabella, and the case is elliptical in shape, whilst in cornéfoliella and zsabella it is nearly circular. A. ampédopsifoliella. WN. sp. This species is known only in the larval state, unless the species described, but not named below, may be the same. ‘The mine, larva and case are very small, smaller than any other known species. It mines the leaves of Ampelopsis quinguefolia, and the mine is elliptical in out- line. I find that I have mislaid my notes upon the larva. I have never succeeded in breeding it. Can not something be done towards determining the original of some cultivated plants by a knowledge of the habits of insects which feed upon them? A great majority of herbivorous insects are doubtless poly- phagous, but many are confined to a single group of plants, and some to a single species. When an insect known to feed only on a single wild species, if found feeding on an allied cultivated plant, is it not a fair THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 169 ‘deduction that the cultivated one is derived from the wild stock? — Dr. Clemens states that he bred his species A. ésabel/la from the cultivated gtape Isabella, which, if I am rightly informed, is supposed to be derived from Vitis labrusca. 1 have bred it from at least a dozen cultivated varieties, including Catawba, Hartford Prolific and Concord, but I have also bred it from the wild Vitis cordifolia, so that this instance proves nothing. But Dr. C. records the larva of A. viticordifoliella from the leaves of V. cordifolia only, and I have never found its mine in any other species or variety. Would there not bea presumption—if it should now be found mining any cultivated variety—that that variety sprang from the cordifolia stock ? So Dr. C. records Phyllocnistis vitigenel/a from the leaves of V. cordifolia only, whilst I have found it in the leaves of a great many cultivated varieties, including those above named, so that it proves no more than J. isabella; but P. vitifoliella I have never found elsewhere than in the leaves of V7 cordifoliella, and one or two cultivated vines of which I find I have kept no memorandum. Some years ago I bought from the gardener of the late N. Longworth, of Cincinnatti, a grape vine of a variety but little cultivated, called ““Longworth’s Seedling, No. 20,” the origin of which the gardener refused to tell me. The foliage is unlike that of any other grape known to me, and is still less like that of Ampelopsis guinguefolia, and approaches V. cordifolia, Last summer I found its leaves mined by a larva closely resembling that of A. ampelopsifoliella, supra, and which I suspect to be the same. I have never found it in the leaves of any other plant, though over a dozen other varieties of grapes grow within a few feet of the Longworth vine. From it I bred the species described below, which I do not now name,as it may prove to be identical with 4.amfelopsifoliella. The ‘single specimen was a little injured, and the description is therefore in one or two respects imperfect. Palpi pale yellowish ? Head and face bright but pale golden, insome lights silvery, tinged with golden. Antennae brown, /azvtly annulate with whitish. Thorax and primaries rich purplish brown, in some lights ‘strongly purple or bronzed ; before the middle of the primaries is a some- what oblique fascia, which is silvery, or bright but pale golden according to the light, widest and nearer to the base of the wing on the dorsal margin, and not constricted on the fold; a silvery or pale bright golden ‘spot on the dorsal margin, just before the ciliae, and a smaller costal one mearly opposite, avd a spot of the same hue at the apex. Cliliae a little 170 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. paler than the wings, but I can not discover any hinder marginal line. Al, ex. fe inch. The larva is white, without maculae, but with the anterior margin of the first segment brown. A. hydrangeella. WN. sp. The mine and larva only of this species is known, and I have never succeeded in rearing the imago. The mine, larva and case resemble those of A. viticordifoliella, but are perhaps a little smaller. It mines the leaves: of the wild Aydrangea (H. nivea.) Dr. Clemens states that the species described by him mine the leaves: of the various plants in the latter part of August and in September, from which I infer that he found them only at that time. But the mines of all the species may be found as early as the first of July, and in increasing numbers from that time until the fall of the leaves. I have reared A. cornifoliella in the latter part of July, from leaves gathered in that month, and have found the mines and larvae of all the other species, though I have only succeeded in rearing the other species in the spring from mines. gathered in the fall. NOTES ON THE “LIST” OF 1868. BY AUG. R. GROTE, Curator of Articulata, Buffalo Soc. of Natural Sciences. Preparatory to a fresh edition of the ‘‘ List of Lep.,” of 1868, a few memoranda of the necessary changes will be published. Sesia uniformis, p iii. This species is distinct from fhysbe, and has — been noticed by Mr. Lintner in his valuable “ Entomological Contribu- tions.” Mr. Couper found it on Anticosti. This can not be Sesta ruficaudis Kirby, the description of which is given on p. 27 of the ‘« Synonymical Catalogue” of 1865. Kirby says: two first segments of” the body yellow olive, two next black, the rest ferruginous with yellow olive spots. Uniforms has the first segments yellow olive, the next deep: ferruginous, the next again olive, and the anal hairs black, with ferruginous. central tuft. In fact, Kirby’s description rather resembles difinis in the- body parts. And from his comparison with fuciformis, we should think. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 171 at once of difinis. But the terminal segments in difints are not “ ferru-. ginous” any more than in wxiformis, and so Kirby may have had a boreal species we do not yet know before him. From his description there is. no more correspondence with uaiformis than with ¢hysbe; rather does his. description agree with /usctcaudis as to the abdomen terminally. Cressonia juglandis, p. iv. To this species must be cited Sm. pallens of Mr. Strecker, whose figure represents a pale 2 specimen of C. Juglandis, without the median shade on the forewings. Belfrage has sent C. juglandis from Texas. Dysodea || p. vi. This generic name is preoccupied and must give way to that of Platythyris. Mr. Walker's type of Varnia appears- distinct. | We have probably but one species which should be known as Platythyris oculatana. Boisduval’s figure and description of Vitrina do. not agree with our species, and probably vétrina represents ocudatana in Europe. Much confusion has occurred through Dr. Clemens having described the species figured by us, Am. Lyc. Nat. Hist., N. Y., vol. viii,. pl. £3, figs. 4-5, as one of the Tortricide, and without referring to Boisduval’s original illustration of the genus. A second species is. afterwards described by Dr. Clemens under the name of Dysodia mar- garitana, which I have never seen. Consult Am. Soc. Belge, T. 7, Pl. 1, for an illustration ot the embryonic stages of Ziyris. They seem to- correspond generally very well with Dr. Clemens’ characters of the larva of Dysodea. NOTES ON MEGACHILE CENTUNCULARIS. BY THOS. G. GENTRY. GERMANTOWN, PA. Since so much has been written upon the habits of our ordinary Leaf-cutting Bee, it would seem presumptuous for me to offer anything further in connection therewith. But a few facts which came to my notice- recently are sufficiently interesting and important to merit publication. During the latter part of June, 1873, several cells, a half a dozen in number, were sent to me by a friend, who had accidentally brought them to light while digging underneath the shade of a Spir@a corymbosa. They were found in close proximity to each other, arranged in a_ nearly horizontal position, at a depth of three inches below the surface of the 172 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. -ground. The soil was comparatively solid. From the freshness of the leaves which composed the cells it would seem that the work had but lately been accomplished, but after the examination of a few, it was evident that some time had elapsed, since the larvae had attained to -considerable dimensions. The cells were nearly three-quarters of an inch in length, with a -diameter of one-fourth of an inch. ‘They were constructed of nearly perfect leaves of Spiraca corymbosa, instead of those of the various species -of Rose. The outermost circle of leaves, three in number, had their margins slightly overlapping on the exterior, each piece forming an arc of _a circle of 120 degrees. Within these were other three, arranged -alternately with them; others, again, alternating with the latter, and so -on until there were no less than six circles, having eighteen pieces in all. Each succeeding individual layer from without inwardly projected but -slightly beyond its predecessor, having but a slight resemblance ‘“‘to a long sleeve with folds upon it,” as has been affirmed by writers. The mouth of each cell was closed by six circular pieces of leaves, nipped from the same plants. These were a trifle larger than the mouth of the -cell, and when in position presented a concave surface facing outwardly. It is obvious that the whole structure is a striking proof of adaptation to an end. If the cell had been arranged vertically, its structure would -doubtless have afforded water a ready access to the larva and its food, and thus have defeated the object which nature had in view. In the horizontal position the tile-like arrangement in the exterior, acts as a sort of roof by which the water is turned off. The concave arrangement of the circular pieces subserves a similar purpose. The freshness of the leaves was -due, no doubt, to the protection which the enveloping earth afforded. “The chemical rays of sunlight, which act upon the parenchymatous material of the leaf, when deprived of its vitality, converting the green. -and granular chlorophyl into others of a brownish hue, operate with less intensity at the depth of three inches. The comparative absence of moisture in the ground, no doubt, prevents oxidation ; there being ample moisture at the same time to insure softness and prevent rigidity. During the early part of last April (1874), several cells were brought to me by one of my pupils, which, on a superficial examination, appeared to be the mud cells of our ordinary Pelopeus, the mud-dauber. They were found adherent to the. rafters of an unplastered attic. The cells -were arranged side by side in numbers of three. On the exterior there THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 17 were no shallow grooves, denoting lines of demarcation. With this unimportant difference, the general outline of the mud mass, with its combination of pellets, was exactly similar to that constructed by the mud-dauber. Had the lines of separation existed, I should have had no hesitancy in characterizing it as a case either of usurpation of instinct upon the part of the AZegachile, or one of confiscation of property. Within, exposed to view by detachment from the aforesaid rafters, were- what I supposed to be the leafy cells of Megachi/le. ‘The length of these and the peculiar disposition of their parts, materially different from what I had always observed, operated upon my mind to such an extent that I was almost constrained to believe that I had met with something altogether new to science, or else that I had been fortunate enough to discover a species of Pelopeus with Megachile-like habits. Each cell was one and one-eighth inches in length, with a diameter slightly exceeding one-fourth of an inch. It was built of elliptical pieces- snipped from the leaves of a species of Spirea (S. corymbosa, it seemed to me.) ‘The pieces were of less dimensions than those before alluded to, and arranged somewhat on a similar plan, except that there was a strong appearance of a double cell, as if the inferior concavity of one cell had been deposited in the superior concavity or mouth of the other. This resemblance held true to a certain extent, but the absence of a clear line of division between the two seemed to militate against the idea of a double arrangement. Having kept a few of the cells a reasonable length of time, until all hope of seeing insects emerge therefrom had vanished, I began the work of destruction by carefully pulling some of them to pieces. While engaged in my labor I was led to notice the comparative ease with which each relative structure separated in the middle. Within the aperture of one cell was a cylindrical pouch, composed of pure silk, glazed within by an oily secretion from the larva. This containsd a perfect, but dead bee, which was readily identified as Megachile centuncularis. The lower half of the same enclosed a similar silken sack, with fragments of legsy wings, antennz and complete body segments, with a mass of debris which showed the clearest evidence of .the ravages of some ruthless destroyer. Under a glass of moderate power, I had little difficulty in recognizing the fragments as parts of a Megachile similar to the above. This last fact impressed me as peculiarly interesting and novel, as. showing the economy which exists and is practiced among certain 174 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. individuals of this species. To construct the inner leafy cells, with their ‘numerous parts, is a labor of little moment when contrasted with the hours that must be spent in moulding the clay for the outer side into small pellets, and then adjusting them to their proper positions. The existence of two bees in separate cases of silk, one above the other, in the same earthy apartment, seems to imply the existence of a double leafy cell, even though a partition between the two should be wanting. It would appear that the deposition of one cell upon another would defeat the object which the mother Aegachile had in view. On the supposition that oviposition in the upper cell took place subsequently to that in the lower, the time of leaving the egg would be earlier in the latter, the larva would sooner mature, and the perfect insect would be prepared to leave its prison-house anterior to its associate, and, unable to effect its exit by reason of the narrowness of its domicile, would perish. This, doubtless, would be the upshot of the affair if similar cells in like situations should be built in the summer season. But as far as I have had any experience in the matter, the summer abodes of A/egachile are single, a few inches below the surface of the ground, and generally under the shelter of some protecting shrub, where the warm rays of the sun can not effect any mischief. This site is doubtless well selected for the reasons above adduced. There are usually two broods of this species in a season; a summer brood, which makes its appearance early in July, and a spring brood which has survived the winter in its double cell of earth and leaves. It is possible that the larva, after having exhausted its stock of honey and pollen, its natural food early in the fall, passes into the condition of a pupa, and thus remains until awakened from its sleep by the genial warmth of spring. In the cells designed for the winter accommodation of the species, the double arrangement of the inner cells will not materially affect the original purpose, since both insects will have passed through the cycle of trans- formations, and when the suitable time shall have arrived for their departure, the one occupying the upper cell will have made its way out and thus left a clear passage for the one below. The absence of a line of separation between the two cells appears to indicate that the food had been deposited in the lower cell, and two eggs instead of one had been left in mistake. Where it is the custom of the insect to deposit but one egg, instinct teaches it to collect just enough THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 175 food to provide for the sustenance of the larva to which it gives birth ; the two eggs in the present cases were deposited through some inadvert- ence upon the part of the insect, and it does not seem wise to conclude that a similar inadvertency had led to an accumulation of a double portion of food. If this double brood had been the result of mistake, it is not possible that several mistakes of a similar kind would have occurred, since it was my good fortune to meet with unoccupied cells that showed evidence of being once occupied. If two eggs are deposited within the same cell, there must be collected .a double quantity of pollen and honey for the nourishment of the larve. The one which attained to full growth first would, no doubt, seek a clear ‘space in which to spin its covering, and this would be afforded by the upper part of the tube or upper cell. The other, after having made a sufficient space for this essential operation by the consumption of the remaining food, would accomplish the task therein. Some cells, which it was my privilege to examine, exhibited faint tracings of a partition-like arrangement between them. A portion of the debris in the lower cell, to which reference has been previously made, may have been due to the comminution of the leaves forming the separating dayers, through some cause or other. But this Iam unable to substantiate. If such should prove to be the case by future observations, there is ‘no doubt that there will be found to exist a separate accumulation of pollen and honey in each cell. After a little reflection, there seems to be an offset to a portion of this argument. May it not be possible that after the two larve had matured into perfect insects, the more powerful one overcame the weaker, and that the fragments of wings, legs, body segments, &c., are the sad trophies of ‘such a conflict? This point would be worthy of acceptance if every cell which was examined had betrayed similar evidences. But it was not the case. It only remains, then, to assume one of two opinions—either that the two ova were deposited upon a double allowance of food, so that the larvee, when hatched, should find ample sustenance to reach maturity, and ‘subsequently had constructed their silken cocoons in their respective positions, said positions being determined upon by priority of growth; -or, that a double cell was built, one on the top of the other, each properly -victualled and provided with an ovum. 176 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. STRAY NOTES ON CANADIAN DIPTERA. BY BEVERLEY R. MORRIS, M. D., NOTTINGHAM, ENGLAND. The following fragmentary notes are submitted to the readers of the CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST in the hope that they may assist in even a small measure in determining the numbers of this order occurring in the Dominion. When in Canada I only incidentally captured Diptera, and the number I possess is very limited. I am indebted to F. Smith, Esq., of the British Museum, for the names of those given below. There are some other species as yet undetermined, and which on some future occasion I may succeed in getting named. ‘The localities and dates given may be relied upon, as I numbered every insect taken, and recorded the date and locality at the time. I have included a few taken in New Hampshire and Maine, asit is probable they may also be found in Canada. Apologizing for the imperfection of the list, I send it in hope of assisting any one who may take up the Diptera of Canada. For the labels being lost off some I am indebted to the gross carelessness of one of our railways, over which the cabinet containing my insects was sent. I found great numbers loose,. some ground to powder, others more or less injured, and many with the tickets shaken off. This prevents my being certatn of the localities, &c.,. in some cases, but I de/eve all were taken in or near Toronto. Anthrax fuscipennis, Say. I took this fly in considerable numbers on the carriage drive in front of the Rev. W. Ritchie’s, at Georgina, on the 8th of August, 1863. They were hovering over holes in the gravel. Anthrax analis, Say. Taken at the same time and place, and along with the last. Habits. the same. Anthrax bastardi, Macq. One was taken at Orillia in August,1863. I also took one at Gorham, in New Hampshire, on August rgth, 1861. Anthrax terminipennis Say. Labels lost, but taken, I believe, at Toronto. Ppa Teg me ee we ee ee Fe ne eee ee Pe ee ba | THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 17 Anthrax fulvina,Say. Taken at Orilia the end of July, 1863; also at Cape Cottage, Port- land, Maine, July 29th, 1861, and up to August 8th. Stratiomis ischiaca, Harris. At Cape Cottage, Portland, August 2nd, 1861. Syritta proxima, Say. Taken at Cape Cottage, Portland, on August 3rd, 1861. Syrphus Ribestt, Fab. Label lost, but I believe taken at Toronto. Syrphus agnon, Walk. At Toronto, in our garden, Nov. 10, 1861. Eristalis inflexus, Walk. Cape Cottage, Portland, July 22nd, rgér. Eristatis sincerus, Harris, At Toronto in 1860. Eristalis nebulosus, Walk. Label lost. Conops sagittaria, Say. Near Cape Cottage, Portland, July 24th, 1861. Two specimens. Tachina finttima, Walk. Cape Cottage, Portland, August 7th, 1861. Common. Tachina apiifera, Walk. College Avenue, Toronto, June 3rd, 1858. Cape Cottage, Portland, July 27th, 1861. Tachina iterans, Walk. Label lost. Probably Toronto. ? Sp. At Orilia in August, 1863. Same size as Z: finitima. Abdomen black, with a white spot at the side of each segment. ? Sp. Bred from a chrysalis of some moth at Toronto, April 2nd, 1862. Rather smaller than the last species. Abdomen black, with somewhat obsolete white spots on side of each segment. Eyes reddish. ? Sp. Somewhat like the last, but only half the size. Label lost. ? Sp. Label lost. Same size as last. Wings iridescent ; body black; eyes brownish red. 178 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Chrysops carbonarius, Walk. Taken at the Humber, Toronto, June 13th, 1863. Asilus ————? Sp. Cape Cottage, Portland, August 16th, 1861. A large species, measur- ing an inch and a quarter in iength, and nearly an inch and a half in expanse of wings. CORRESPONDENCE. EXPLANATORY. Dear SIR,— The following considerations have suggested themselves to me in reference to Mr. Herman Strecker’s recent personal attacks. For myself I do not think that either Mr. Strecker’s style or language can be defended on any ground. As to the matter, this is furnished by certain synonyms in my writings on North American moths. To those conversant with the subject, it is not necessary to point out the fewness of such mistakes, but it may have escaped notice that in nearly every instance I have been the first to correct the mistake,and thus Mr. Strecker’s abuse has come ex fost facto and proves itself wholly personal and unscientific. I take pleasure in referring here to words used in my earliest paper (Proc. Acad. Nat, Sci. Phil., 1862, p. 59). I think I have always lived up to my first state- ment, and where I have made a synonym, both ‘‘ willingly and gladly” acknowledged it. And although I am charged by Mr. Strecker with allowing one mistake to remain “ nineteen months” before correction, I can assure him that I still corrected it the moment I became aware that it existed. Certain of these mistakes have occurred in describing American species under distinct names. Sometimes these species have turned out to be the same with European forms, and a synonym has been the result. I do not think this the great misfortune which Mr. Strecker pretends, the Jess when we remember that in many instances the American specimens may be distinguished, and I have suggested that we shall lose a knowledge of these distinguishing points unless we use distinguishing names. Certainly these are occasions for quiet scientific observation, not in any case for unscientific vituperation. The difficulty of avoiding a giving of too great weight to a remote locality is even instanced by Mr. Strecker, who has re-described a $ Cressonia juglandis as a new species of Smerinthus from “Texas.” The pale specimen, merely wanting the THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 179 median shade on the primaries, would, if caught, say in Reading, have hardly furnished one of Mr. Strecker’s “coveted” novelties. Again, instances are on record where naturalists have first considered the American species the same as the European, and then changed their views and described them as distinct. An instance of this is offered by Brephos infans, first described as the same as the European Srephos parthenias. ‘The amount of error is no greater in the one case than the other. At the time that I commenced my labors, the difficulty of determining our species of moths was very great, certainly much greater than it is now. ‘That this change is in part due to my work I think is true, equally so that Mr. Strecker is both unjust and ungrateful to omit the consideration from his mind. How much he himself is indebted to my labors may be seen by comparing my work on the genus Cafoca/a with his own on the same subject. His figures and determinations are taken from the collec- tion I studied and the paper I published; and, in reality, his figures merely supplement my original work. ‘That Mr. Strecker has so generally coincided with me in his specific discriminations in the genus Cafoca/a, is, IT think, less a compliment to my correctness than a proof of Mr. Strecker’s ready acceptance of assistance. I have a few special remarks with which to conclude. I am blamed for retaining the name C. fonderosa instead of the earlier C. nedulosa || for a species of Catocala. From Linnzus to Lederer it has been customary to avoid the repetition of names in the same family of moths, and Gueneé has changed the name of a species of Catocala on account of an Azarta bearing the same specific title. I have never changed the name of another author on this account ; my opinion (as, indeed, cited by Mr. Strecker) being that a fresh name is unnecessary. I have merely, where two names were attached to the same species, preferred the later when the earlier had been previously used. Whether my descriptions in the genus Catoca/a are the best, I will not dispute with Mr. Strecker ; in his comments on C. ponderosa Mr. Strecker forgets that we figured the species, in justice to Mr. Wiest, the artist, I think very acceptably. Nor will I allow Mr. Strecker the proper authority to discuss the value of structural characters in the Lepidoptera, seeing that he has shown no experience in the matter, and is unable to discriminate even between the sexes of Cafoca/a when the abdomen is wanting. A. R. GROTE. 180 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. SYNONYMICAL NOTE. Dr. Boisduval has recently re-described Zudryas grata (Fabr.) from Georgia under the name Zudryas assimilis, with the remark: Cette belle ‘espece n’a pas encore ete figuree. It is manifestly unimportant to Dr. Boisduval that the science of Entomology is pursued in America. In this same paper (Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, 1874) the genus Alypza is erroneously attributed to Kirby, and a citation is given: “ Sphinx octomaculata Hubn. Zut., 119, 120.” which does not exist, the proper citation being ‘‘ Alypia octomaculalis Hubn., Zutr., No. 60, fig. 119, 720.” Dr. Boisduval separates Drury’s figure of Urania rhipheus (1773) from Cramer’s (1782), under the new nameof Urania Druryi. This is, how- ever, a simple synonym in any event, since Drury’s species must retain the name of AAipheus as originally proposed. Cramer himself says, when describing his RhAipheus, T. 3, p. 193, “Ce beau Papillon et qui est tres rare, ressemble beaucoup a’ celui qui a ete annonce par Mr. Drury dans ses Illustrations of Natural History, Vol. 2, pl. 23, figs. 1, 2, sous le nom que nous lui donnons ci-dessus.” Gueneé, in 1857, also draws attention to this mistake of Dr. Boisduval’s, then only proposed to be committed. It has been generally conceded that Drury’s species is the same as Cramer’s, and that the differences in the figures arose from an intentional mutilation of Drury’s original specimen. Dr. Boisduval’s quotation from Lacordaire would hardly cover such a case as this, in which a pair of scissors very probably effected ‘‘la creation.” To find another ‘taille sur le meme patron,” would argue, then, a lack of conscience somewhere, as well as the sacrifice of a specimen. But Dr. Boisduval insists on other characters to separate the two species than the absence of the tails, i. e., the large size and the ornamentation of the fore wings of RAzpheus Drury. So in this case we should have two species, i. e., Chrystridia Rhipheus (Drury) nec Hubn. ( = Urania Druryi Boisd.) and Chrysiridia Orientalis (Swains) { = Rhipheus Cramer 385, A. B.; Chrystridia Rhiphearia Hubn.) A. R. Grote. Our usual acknowledgements of books received have been omitted for want of space, they will appear in our next.—Ep. C. E. ae The Canadian Entomologist. VOL. VI. LONDON, ONT., OCTOBER, 1874. No. 10 ANNUAL ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, 1874. To the Members of the Entomological Society of Ontario : GENTLEMEN,—I beg to offer you again, after the lapse of a year, my hearty congratulations upon the continued prosperity of our Society. As you have already learnt from the Report of our Secretary-Treasurer, we have been favored with a slight increase in our list of membership—as large, indeed, as can fairly be expected in a Society which confines itself to the study of a particular branch of Natural Science, and which cannot therefore attract into its ranks many who are not specially engaged, to some extent at least, in this limited field of investigation. It is especially pleasing to find that our number of branches continues to increase—a highly successful one, with its headquarters in Montreal, having been organized since our last annual meeting. Its first annual report has been already presented to us in the pages of our journal. The CaNnapIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, upon whose success the well-being and fair fame of our Society so largely depends, has—I am sure you will all agree with me—been more ably sustained than ever before. The thanks of the whole Society are assuredly due to the energetic and talented Editor, Mr. Saunders, who has been, indeed, its mainstay from the issue of its first number until now. It would be well if all our mem- bers would aid him, not only by contributions, but also by increasing the circulation, and thereby improving the means of support of the publication. When I applied jxst now the term “limited” to our field of enquiry, I only did so when considering Entomology as one amongst a large number of sections of the great circle of natural sciences, which includes within its area the study of all things material which come within the range of man’s intellectual powers. If we look, however, at Entomology and its objects alone, we cannot fail to see at once that it is practically 182 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. without limit—that there is work enough for thousands of investigators for almost innumerable generations to come. And when we couple with Entomology other kindred sciences, such as Botany, Geology and Physical Geography, which are so closely allied that no student can safely overlook them, we begin almost to be overwhelmed with the vast extent of this field of knowledge that we seek to explore. So vast, indeed, is the field that no one now ventures to survey the whole of it, except in a very general way; each explorer finds himself compelled—if he would do any effective work—to confine his labour to some one or two of its sections or subsections. By this division of labour, all departments of the Science will by degrees be taken up, and much that is now a ‘ ferra incognita’ will become familiar to the patient explorer. In our own country—within the bounds of this great Dominion—there is need of many more students and explorers. Even in this Province of Ontario, the headquarters of our Society, where more has been done than in any other part of Canada, there is yet room for a great increase to our band of collectors and investigaters. | How incomplete, for instance, is even yet our list of Diurnal Lepidoptera, and how many pages are still blank in the life history of some of our commonest butterflies? Our able Editor, my excellent friend, Mr. Saunders, has done much to fill up these blank pages, and his work is everywhere recognized as thorough and authoritative ; but yet there remains much more to be done, that we hope our members will before long accomplish. If we turn to Crepuscular and Nocturnal Lepidoptera, we must feel almost appalled at the extent of ourignorance. For those who have the time and the ability, I can think of no more interesting or attractive field of enquiry—none that will sooner or better repay the pains-taking student, whether he looks for fame or pleasure, whether he sighs for fresh fields to conquer, or desires to set his foot where man has not trodden before. In a department where so much remains to be done, we all, I am sure, offer a most cordial welcome to one who has recently cast in his lot among us, and has traversed the broad Atlantic in order to study the Noctuide of this country. I allude to Mr. George Norman, of St. Catharines, late of Forres, in Scotland. In another order of insects, the Coleoptera, much no doubt has been accomplished. Through the pains-taking labours of a Billings and a Pettit, not to mention other good workers, and by the aid of the great authorities in the neighbouring States, Dr. Leconte and Dr. Horn in par- ticular, we have been able to increase our list of Canadian beetles from a few hundreds at the birth of the Society, to more than as many thousands THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 183 now. But still how very much more remains to be done? What a field of labour there is before both student and collector in the Carabide, the Staphylinide, the Curculionide and other numerous families of beetles! May we not hope that during the coming winter our present scattered stores of knowledge will be utilized and made available for the good of all, by the compilation and publication of a large addition to our old and valuable list of Canadian Coleoptera ? If there remains so much to be done in these two favorite orders, what shall I say of the remainder, that are so generally neglected? It is surely time that some of our members should devote themselves to the working up of such interesting orders as the Neuroptera, the Hymen- optera, the Orthoptera, the Hemiptera, even if no one can be found at present to take up the study of the more difficult Diptera. In all these orders there is the nucleus of a collection in the cabinets of our Society, while no doubt much additional material would be furnished by individuals to any member who will take up in earnest the study of any one of them. It would be a great contribution to our knowledge of Canadian insects if there could be published by the Society carefully prepared lists of as many species as possible in each of these orders. Such lists would, of course, be very incomplete at first, but they could easily be so arranged in publication that additions might be made to them at any time, as our stores of knowledge increase. Such, gentlemen, are some of the modes in which, I think, we should endeavour to extend the operations of our Society. If each year, when we assemble together for our annual meeting, we can point to some such work done in the previous twelvemonth, we shall have good reason to congratulate ourselves upon real permanent progress—upon building up the foundation of an Entomological structure that will prove enduring and substantial in time to come. Thus far I have referred to Entomology as a purely scientific pursuit ; there is another aspect in which we cannot refrain from regarding it, viz., as a subject of very great economic importance to every inhabitant of our land. This view of Entomology has been especially brought before us of late by the havoc that has been produced in our farms and gardens by hordes of destructive insects. The dreaded Colorado Potato Beetle (Doryphora decem-lineata) has spread eastward with great rapidity, and has now reached the Atlantic coast insome parts of the United States. I have been informed by 184 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. friends who reside in various parts of the Union, that while little, if any, diminution in the numbers of the pest is to be observed in the west, it is. becoming very destructive where it has attained to its second year of colonization. During the first year of its invasion of a particular locality, no appreciable damage is done by it, but as its armies increase in geome- trical progression, the potato crops of the following season generally suffer to a terrible extent. It has now covered the whole of the Province of Ontario, and is very destructive throughout the western half of it, though we are happy to say that our intelligent farmers and gardeners are effectually using the remedies suggested by our colleagues, Messrs Saunders and Reed, in their Report to the Legislature a few years ago. In Quebec it is but beginning to be observed ; no doubt it will be found there in myriads next year. Across the border, it has penetrated to the western portion of Vermont, into New Jersey, down to the sea coast in Pennsylvania, and in Maryland ; at Baltimore, Md., it is very abundant, while straggling outposts have been found as far south as Washington. The whole of New York and Ohio have been pretty well covered with the insect, while in Missouri it is as abundant as ever. In Indiana and Michigan there is a local diminution in the numbers of the pest, but no: where are there as yet any signs of its cessation. The people of Europe are now beginning—and with good reason—to feel alarmed at the prospect of its crossing the Atlantic. The English and French scientific and agricultural publications are commencing to publish notices of the insect and to talk of restrictive measures, while in Germany, we are told that stringent regulations will probably soon be put in force by the Gov- ernment to prevent the invasion of the country. Unless some regulations of this kind are put in general force throughout the whole of Western Europe, I believe that—judging from the spread of noxious European insects on this side of the Atlantic—the Colorado Beetle will. soon become there as familiar an object and as destructive a pest as itis here. While the Colorado Beetle from the Rocky Mountains has been over- spreading the whole northern continent eastward, there has been moving southward and westward in a similar manner another insect—the Cabbage Butterfly (Pzeris rape)—that is almost as injurious as the other. This insect, an European importation, as of course you all know, starting from Quebec some few years ago—there first noticed by our friends, Messrs. Couper and Bowles—has now spread westward over almost the whole of Ontario. At Port Hope it has been this year by far the most common of all butterflies; thousands were to be seen throughout the whole THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 185 season, from early summer to the present time, flitting about along every road, and hundreds hovering over or alighting in every garden. ‘There is hardly a cabbage or cauliflower fit to be eaten anywhere in the neighbour- hood, while stocks and mignonette have been ruthlessly demolished in all the flower gardens. Its spread westward, however, has hardly been as rapid as its movements to the south. The two maritime provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, and all the New England States, have for some time been occupied, and now I am told that this year it is most plentiful as far south as Washington, and that it is by no means rare in Virginia. While referring to the wonderful spread of noxious insects during the past few years, and to their excessive prevalence now, I must not omit to mention the affliction caused to our north-west Province of Manitoba and to many of the western States by the swarms of locusts, or grasshoppers as they are termed (Calopitenus spretus). The accounts of the sufferings caused by this terrible plague are perfectly appalling, and rival anything that we have read of the ravages of the Eastern locusts. Happily for us they do not seem to extend much further to the east than the Missouri River, though, occasionally they penetrate to some of the broad prairies beyond. As a detailed account of this insect will probably be afforded you in the forthcoming Annual Report of our Society, I need not detain you with any further remarks upon it. The only other insect to which I need now call your attention for a “moment, is the Grape-Vine PAyHoxera. Iam glad to learn that its rava- ges in the vineyards to the south of us have been comparatively trifling this year, and that in all probability the summer droughts to which we are so liable, will prevent its ever being as formidable a foe as was at one time apprehended. To turn from this not very cheerful subject, I may mention, before concluding, that Mr. Saunders and myself duly attended the recent meet- ing at Hartford, Conn., of the American Association for the Advancement -of Science. ‘There we had the pleasure of meeting a large number of Entomologists from all parts of the United States, and we had the further gratification also, of being presided over, in general session, by the ablest of American Entomologists, Dr. Leconte, and in the Zoological Section, by another great worker in our department, Mr. S. H. Scudder. Infor- ‘mal meetings of Entomologists were frequently held, and finally it was -agreed upon to form an Entomological Club of Members of the A.A.A.S., who should assemble annually a day before the meeting of the Association 186 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. in the place that may be from time to time selected for its sessions. In this way we trust that much may be done for the furtherance of our favourite branch of science, and that Entomologists generally, from all parts of the continent, will bring together their types of new species and the surplus of their collections for mutual information and benefit. Without further trespassing upon your time and attention, I beg to thank you, gentlemen, for the kind consideration you have shown to my colleagues and myself during our term of office, and with hearty wishes. for the continued prosperity of our Society, I have the honour to be, gentlemen, Your obedient servant, CHARLES J. S. BETHUNE, President E. 8. of O. Trinity College School, Port Hope, Sept. 22, 1874. ON SOME CHANGES IN THE NOMENCLATURE OF NORTH AMERICAN COLEOPTERA, WHICH HAVE BEEN RECENTLY PROPOSED. BY JOHN L. LECONTE, M. D., PHILADELPHIA. Since the issue of the Check List of N. A. Coleoptera by the late Mr. G. R. Crotch, I have been asked by several persons interested in that branch of science, if I would advise them to change the labels in their collections in accordance with the nomenclature of several familiar genera as therein set forth. To all such applicants I have answered, that such changes are not expedient, unless they are fully convinced of the propriety of admitting them. For my part, I considered them quite unnecessary, and still further, contrary to the code of laws of nomenclature under’ which I supposed we were acting. Circumstances, which it is unimportant for me to specify, have prevented me from heretofore making known the views upon which I formed the opinion thus given, but as confusion of ideas upon the adoption or non-adoption of Mr. Crotch’s nomenclature now exists, I think that the time has now arrived for a full discussion of the subject. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 182 For the purpose of confining attention to the more radical changes proposed, I will leave for a future time all questions relating to specific names, and consider at present only those affecting genera. With the exception of some very unimportant examples, these chiefly turn upon the validity of the genera proposed and defined by Dr. Geoffroy in his Histoire Abregee des Insectes. The first edition of this valuable work, in which, as is justly said by Mr. Crotch, he displayed “a degree of acumen far in advance of his age,” bears date on the title page, 1764*, and was printed at Paris. The last edition, with supplements, was printed also in Paris, year of the Republic vii, (1799.) The binominal nomenclature was first distinctly used in zoology in the roth edition of the Systema Naturz, by Linnzus, in 1758, and repeated in the 12th edition, 1766-67. After the publication of the work last mentioned, Fabricius and others, devoting themselves more exclusively to entomology than Linnzeus had done, divided his genera, and in describing new ones adopted other names for several of those described by Geoffroy. The names of these later authors have, until the changes proposed by Mr. Crotch, been adopted without cavil. Thus much as to the history of the question. Now as to the argument. The most systematic attempt to reduce the laws of nomenclature in zoology to a code, capable of being easily understood and applied, was that of the British Association, acting through a committee, which reported at the meeting held in 1842. Without discussing the details of this report, some of which might be and, indeed, were subjected to criticism, it is sufficient to state that the principles therein recommended were adopted by the Association, and without important modification, were reaffirmed by the Association of American Geologists and Naturalists at the meeting held in 1845.t These laws have been accepted and acted on by nearly all investigators in Natural History ever since. Some discussions having taken place which indicated a possibility of improving the code, it was again referred by the British Association to * Mr. Crotch states 1762, but I know not on what authority. + Am. Journ., 2nd series, ii, 423—(1846). 188 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. a committee, which reported substantially the same rules, with a few closer definitions of moot points and some useful commentaries upon certain rules. This report was adopted at the meeting in 1865, and was reprinted with notes by Prof. A. E. Verrill, in the American Journal of Science and Arts, 2nd ser., xlvin, 92, in 1869. It would therefore appear that the common law under which Zoologists now act in questions of nomenclature, is the code, the history of which I have just given. The only other alternative is, that there are no established rules, and that in the Republic of Science each citizen isa judge, capable of expounding the law for Himself, and amenable to no tribunal. I will therefore assume that until a different code is formally adopted, American naturalists are disposed to abide by the recommendations of the two important scientific bodies, whose reports are above mentioned. As the language of all three reports is equally clear and definite upon the points I wish to make against the reception of the Geoffroy’an genera, I shall quote from the latest, reprinted in Silliman’s Journal, 1869, as being most easy of reference. “ Rule III. The committee are of opinion, after much deliberation, that the XIIth edition of the Systema Naturae is that to which the limit of time should apply, viz., 1766”...... (p- 94.) P. 96. ‘*As our subject matter is strictly confined to the d:nomial system of nomenclature, or that which indicates species by means of two Latin words, the one generic, the other specific, and as this invaluable method originated solely with Linnaeus, it is clear that as far as species are concerned, we ought not to attempt to carry back the principle of priority beyond the date of the 12th ed. of the Systema Naturae, 1766. Previous to that period, naturalists were wont to indicate species not by a name comprised in one word, but by a definition which occupied a sentence, the extreme verbosity of which method was productive of great inconvenience.”...... (p. 97.) ‘‘ The same reasons apply to genera.”.... “Brisson, who was a contemporary of Linnaeus and acquainted with the Systema Naturae, defined and published certain genera of birds which are additional to those in the 12th edition of Linnaeus’ works, and which are therefore of perfectly good authority. But Brisson still adhered to the old method of designating species by a sentence instead of a word, and therefore while we retain his defined genera, we do not extend the same indulgence to the titles of his species, even when the latter are accidentally binomial in form.” THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 189 By reference to the several editions of Geoffroy it will be seen, 1st, that he did not adopt the binominal nomenclature, except in regard to the addi- tional species described in the supplements to the edition of 1799*; 2nd, that he did not admit himself any rule of priority in generic names, inas- much as he described genera previously proposed by Linnzeus under other names, quoting Linnzeus in synonymy ; 3rd, that he made no reclamation either in genera or species, in the last edition of his work. It must also be kept in mind that Olivier and Latreille, cotemporaries and friends of Geoffroy, used his generic names only so far as they did not conflict with the genera established by other authors up to the date of their respective memoirs. They did not therefore ‘revive’ these names, as claimed by Mr. Crotch, but adopted them and introduced them into the proper and permanent literature of scientific terminology, thus placing them upon a new basis. It would therefore appear, that notwithstanding the great value of the work of Geoffroy, and the importance of the views of classification which he proposed (and none will be more ready to admit the merit of his labors than myself,) he did, by an unfortunate want of appreciation of the necessity of adopting the Linnean binominal nomenclature, and by not recognizing the principle of priority, exclude himself from being cited either for genus or species under the existing code, except so far as relates to the supplemental species in the edition of 1799. In all other instances the names of his genera are free, and must be attributed to the authors who subsequently employed and defined them, either zw7th or without reference to his use of the names. In order that the evidence upon which I have based my opinion may be readily accessible, I have appended the remarks of Mr. Crotch upon the priority of his names, and two tables, one of synonyms, the other of homonyms of all the Coleopterous genera defined by Geoffroy, In conclusion, I would recommend to those who use the Check List to substitute for the generic names adopted from Geoffroy in that work, the following, which have been in current use: P. 37.—Peltis Geoffr. to SirpHa Linn., and change Si/pha_ to Necropuorus Fabr. Fabricins was the first to divide the Linnaean * An abridgment of his work under the name of Fourcroy, with binominal nomenclature, was issued in 1785, and must be taken, therefore, as the earliest date for his species. 190 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Silpha into two genera. The idea of type species, now commonly (though by no means universally adopted), did not then exist, and consequently it was competent for Fabricius to determine for which part of the genus he would retain the original name. If it was for the part corresponding with Geoffroy’s e/tis, the latter must sink. Fabricius’ Necrophorus, as will be seen in the table, is contained in Dermestes Geoffroy. P. 42.—Change Zyritomide to MYCETOPHAGID&, and Tritoma to Myceropuacus Hellw., or else cite the name 77ztoma from Fourcroy,, 1785. The name in this sense should, in my opinion, be suppressed, as it was founded on a false character, and should not have been separated by Geoffroy from his Dermestes. P. 79.—Change Clerus Geoffr. te TRICHODES Herbst.,and Zhanasimus Latr., so far as it relates to the rst division of the genus, to CLERUS Fabr. Herbst first divided the genus as established by Geoffroy, and adopted by Fabricius, and therefore had the right to apportion the names. to the divisions he founded. P, 88.—Stenocorus Geoffr. The same reasoning would change this. name to RuaciumM Fabr.; the latter author having divided Stenocorus. P. 51.—Change Cisteide to BYRRHID#, and p. 52, Ciste/a to BYRRHUS Linn. P. 93.—Change Spermophagide to BRUCHID&, and Mylabris Geoffr. to- Brucuus Linn. P. 105.—Change TZenebrionellus Cr. to TENEBRIo Linn. Tenebrio Geoffr. is considered by Mr. Crotch to have Aszda as its type, and there- fore the change was proposed by him for the genus, as restricted by Fabricius, who first commenced its division into several genera. The same reason here applies as in several of the preceding instances. P. 107.—Though not connected with the present subject, I may remark that the change of Utoma to Phaleria, and of PHALERIA to Halophalerus Cr., has been produced by the assumption of generic types for the genera of authors who would certainly have repudiated the idea, had it been proposed to them. /P&aéeria Latr. was founded on three species, now belonging to different genera, and in course of time, and by the will of those who divided the genus, the 1st species has gone back to the previously established genus Grathocerus, the 2nd became U/oma and the 3rd retained the name PAaveria. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 191 P. 108.—Change Pseudocistela Cr. to CISTELA Fabr. P. 115.—Cantharis Zivn. should read Geoffr. The table of synonyms of Geoffroy’s genera will show that by adhering to the received code of laws of nomenclature, the name CanrHaris Linn. should be restored to some genus of Telephoridae which contains Linnaean species. Of these perhaps Podabrus would be the most convenient, while for the blistering flies, a dismemberment of JZé/oe Linn., the name proposed by Fabricius, Lytra, must be adopted. Remarks of Mr. Crotch on the Genera of Geoffroy, Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1870, 43: “1762. Geoffroy, in his Histoire Abregee, divides the Coleoptera into 50 genera, displaying a degree of acumen far in advance of his age,. which was but little appreciated by his contemporaries ; the ill-concealed jealousy of Linnaeus is only too evident in his 12th edition ; Olivier and Latreille succeeded in restoring the majority of Geoffroy’s names, but there are still several which must be adopted. . . . Platycerus and Peltis, often attributed to Geoffroy, must either be rejected as synonyms, or, if allowed to remain, be quoted from Latreille and Illiger, who revived them. ‘The others ought to be all retained.” Table of Synonyms of Geoffroy’s Genera. 1764. 1767. 1775. 1789. 1796-1806. GEOFFROY. LINNAUS. FABRICIUS. OLIVIER. LATREILLE. 1. Platycerus Lucanus Lucanus Lucanus Lucanus Trogossita ‘Trogosita Platycerus 2. Ptilinus Ptinus Hispa Ptilinus Ptilinus Drilus Drilus 3. Scarabzeus Scarabaeus Scarabaeus Scarabaeus Scarabaeus. Cetonia Cetonia Cetonia Trichius Trichius Trox ‘Trex Trox Melolontha Melolontha Melolontha Aphodius Geotrupes Oryctes Hoplia 4. Copris Scarabaeus Scarabaeus Copris Copris Ateuchus 192 1764. GEOFFROY. 14. 15. r6. Ey: 18. 19. 20, . Attelabus Dermestes . Byrrhus . Anthrenus . Cistela . Peltis . Cucujus . Elater . Buprestis Bruchus Lampyris Cicindela Omalysus Hydrophilus Dytiscus Dyticus Gyrinus THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 1707: LINNAEUS. Hister Dermestes Silpha Ptinus Dermestes Byrrhus Byrrhus Silpha Buprestis Elater Carabus Cicindela Ptinus Lampyris Cantharis Dytiscus Gyrinus 1775: 1789. FABRICIUS. OLIVIER. Hister Hister Dermestes Dermestes Necrophorus Necrophorus Tritoma Ips Dryops Sphaeridium Sphaeridium Elophorus Elophorus Nitidula Nitidula Anobium Anobium Anthrenus Anthrenus Byrrhus Byrrhus Silpha Silpha Buprestis Buprestis Elater Elater Carabus Carabus Cicindela Cicindela Elaphrus Elaphrus Ptinus Ptinus Lampyris Lampyris Pyrochroa Cantharis Telephorus Malachius Malachius Necydalis Oedemera Omalisus Hydrophilus Hydrophilus Dytiscus Dytiscus Gyrinus Gyrinus 1796-1806. LATREILLE. Sisyphus Onthophagus Hister Dermestes Necrophorus Ips Dryops Sphaeridium Elophorus Nitidula Anobium Anthrenus Byrrhus Silpha Choleva Buprestis Elater ‘Throscus Carabus Cicindela Elaphrus Loricera Panagaeus Bembidium Harpalus Brachinus Lebia Ptinus Gibbium Lampyris Telephorus Malachius Oedemera Dasytes Omalisus Hydrophilus Dyticus Hyphydrus Haliplus Gyrinus THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 1764. 1767. GEOFFROY. LINNUS. 1775: FABRICIUS. 21. Melolontha Chrysomela Cryptocephalus Clytra 22. Prionus Cerambyx 23. Cerambyx Cerambyx 24. Leptura Leptura Cerambyx Necydalis 25. Stenocorus Cerambyx Leptura 26. Luperus 27.Cryptocephalus Chrysomela Cryptoceph. 28. Crioceris Chrysomela Hispa 29. Altica Chrysomela 30. Galeruca Chrysomela 31. ChrysomelaChrysomela 32. Mylabris Bruchus 33. Rhinomacer Attelabus 34. Curculio Curculio 35- Bostrichus Dermestes Dermestes Attelabus 36. Clerus 37- Anthribus Dermestes 38. Scolytus 39. Cassida Cassida 40. Anaspis Mordella 41. Coccinella Coccinella Prionus Cerambyx Lamia Saperda Callidium Stenocorus Leptura Donacia Rhagium Crioceris Hispa Altica Crioceris Chrysomela Bruchus Attelabus Curculio Bostrichus Clerus Notoxus Dermestes Curculio Bruchus Bostrichus Cassida Coccinella 1789. 1796-1806. OLIVIER. LATREILLE. Clythra Prionus Prionus Cerambyx Cerambyx Necydalis Lamia Saperda Cerambyx Callidium Prionus Stenocorus Leptura Leptura Donacia Donacia Luperus Cryptoceph. Cryptoceph. Eumolpus Eumolpus Crioceris Crioceris Hispa Orsodacna Altica Altica Galeruca Galeruca Chrysomela Chrysomela Prasocuris Bruchus Bruchus Attelabus Attelabus Rhynchites Rhynchites Apion Apion Apoderus Curculio Curculio Calandra Brachyrhinus Lixus Cionus Bostrichus __ Bostrichus Anthribus Clerus Clerus Necrobia Necrobia Thanasimus Opilus Anthribus Anthribus Anthribus Macrocephalus Scolytus Scolytus Cassida Cassida Mordella Anaspis Coccinella Coccinella 193. 194 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 1764. Toy. L775: 1789. 1796-1896. GEOFFROY. LINNAUS. FABRICIUS. OLIVIER. LATREILLE. 42. Tritoma Chrysomela Mycetophagus Mycetophagus 43. Diaperis Chrysomela Chrysomela Diaperis Diaperis 44. Pyrochroa Lampyris Pyrochroa __ Pyrochroa Pyrochroa Cantharis 45. Cantharis Meloe Lytta Cantharis Cantharis Necydalis Necydalis Oedemera Oedemera Lagria Lagria Sitaris 46. Tenebrio Tenebrio Tenebrio Tenebrio Tenebrio Silpha Opatrum Opatrum Opatrum Blaps Blaps Blaps Helops Helops Helops Cistela* Cistela Cistela Asida Pedinus 47. Mordella Mordella Mordella Mordella Mordella Cistela Cistela 48. Notoxus Meloe Notoxus Notoxus Notoxus 49. Cerocoma Meloe Cerocoma Cerocoma Cerocoma 50. Staphylinus Staphylinus Staphylinus Staphylinus Staphylinus Paederus Paederus Paederus Oxyporus Oxyporus Oxyporus 51. Necydalis Cantharis Cantharis Telephorus Malthinus 52. Meloe Meloe Meloe Meloe Meloe Fabr.; Parnus Fabr.; Dryops Latr.; 7, Dermestes Fadbr.; Notes to Table of Synonyms: 1, Trogosita Fabr.; 3, Geotrupes Fadr.; 4, Ateuchus Fabr.; 6, Lyctus 13, Brachinus Fabr., Weber ; 15, Lycus Fabr.; 16, Telephorus Scheffer, 1766 ; Dasytes Fabr.; 17, Omalysus Faér.; 19, Hydrachna Fabr.; 21, Clytra Lazcharting, 1781; 24,Prionus Fadr.; 26, Crioceris Fabr.; Ptinus Faby., 27, Eumolpus Fabr.; 28, Lema Fabr.; 29, adopted by Fabr. in Syst. Ent., 1775; trans- ferred to Galleruca in Ent. Syst., 1792; some of the species also under Crioceris and Chrysomela; 30, Galleruca Fadr.; 32, the name Bruchus was adopted by Linnaeus from Kalm.; 34, Lixus and Calandra /aér.; 35, Fabricius referred capucinus to Bostrichus in 1775, but in 1792 transferred it to Apate ; 36, Clerus Za/v.=Trichodes Herbst, Fabr.; 38, Eccoptogaster Ferbst.; 40, Mordella Fabr.; 42, Ips Fabr., Mycetophagus Fadr.; 43, Diaperis, Hispa Fadr.; 45, Lagria Fadr.; 48, Notoxus Faér., 1782, Anthicus Fabr., 1801 ; 50, several of Gravenhorst’s genera, also adopted THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. by Latreille. These notes are not intended to give in all instances the authority by whom the additional names of genera were first proposed, but only to show their use by the authors quoted. Table of Homonyms of Geoffroy’s Genera, with their Reference to Modern Famitltes : oy AME YD on Platycerus ; Lucanide. Lucanide (Za¢r.) Ptilinus ; Ptinide. Ptinide (O“iv., Latr.) Scarabaeus,; Scarabaeide. Scarabaeide (Linn., &c.) Copris ; Scarabaeide. Scarabaeide (O“v., Zatr.) Attelabus ; Histeride. Curculionide (Linn., &c.) Dermestes ; Dermestide. Dermestide (Linn., &c.) Byrrhus ; Ptinide. Byrrhide (Linn., &c.) Anthrenus; Dermestide. Dermestide (Fadr., Oliv., Latr.) Cistela; Byrrhide. Cistelide (/adr., Oliv., Latr.) Peltis ; Silphide. Trogositide. (. “ ) _cucujus; Buprestide. Cucujide..( “..)} . Elater; Elateride. Elateride (Zznn., &c.) Buprestis ; Carabide. Buprestide (Zinz., Gc.) Bruchus ; Ptinide. Bruchide (Zzum, &c.) . Lampyris; Lampyride. Lampyride (Zizx., Gc.) Cicindela; Telephoride. Cicindelide (Zinn., Gc.) Omalysus; Lycide. Lycide (Ofv., Latr.) Hydrophilus ; Hydrophilide. Hydrophilide (Aadr., Oliv., Latr.) Dytiscus ; Dytiscide. Dytiscide (Zinz., &e.) . Gyrinus; Gyrinide. Gyrinide (Zinn. Gc.) . Melolontha ; Chrysomelide. Scarabaeide (Fadr., Oliv., Latr.) . Prionus ; Cerambycide. Cerambycide (Fadr., Oliv., Latr.) Cerambyx ; Cerambycide. Cerambycide (Zinn., Gc.) . Leptura; Cerambycidé. Cerambycide (Zizn., Gc.) . Stenocorus ; Cerambycide. Cerambycide (/udr., Oliv., Lair.) . Luperus; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Ozv.) . Cryptocephalus; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (fadr., Oliv., THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 28. Crioceris ; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Faér., Oliv., Latr.) 29. Altica; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Faér., Oliv., Latr.) 30. Galeruca; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Odv., ZLatr., Fabr.) 31. Chrysomela ; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Lénz., &-c.) 32. Mylabris; Bruchide. Meloide (faédr., Oliv., Latr.) 33- Rhinomacer; Attelabide. Rhinomaceride (Za¢r. ) 34. Curculio; Curculionide. Curculionide (Zinz., Sc.) 35. Bostrichus; Bostrichide. Bostrichide (Ofv., Zatr.) Scolytide- (Fabr.) 36. Clerus; Cleride. Cleride (Aadr., Oliv., Latr.) 37. Anthribus; Anthribide. Anthribide, Ofv., Latr. 38. Scolytus; Scolytide. Scolytide (O@v., Zatr.) Carabide, Fabr. 45- Fabr. ) 46. 47- 48. 49. 50. Bi. Cassida ; Chrysomelide. Chrysomelide (Zznmn., &c.) . Anaspis; Mordellide. Mordellide (Za¢r.) . Coccinella ; Coccinellide. Coccinellide (Zinz., Gc.) . Tritoma; Mycetophagide. Erotylide (Fadr., &c.) Diaperis ; Tenebrionide. Tenebrionide (OZiv., Zatr. ) . Pyrochroa ; Pyrochroide. Pyrochroide (Fadr., Oliv., Latr.) Cantharis ; Meloide. Meloide ( O/iv., Zatr.) Telephoride (Zinn... Tenebrio; Tenebrionide. Tenebrionide (Zznz., Ge.) Mordella; Mordellide. Mordellide ( Zinun., &c.) Notoxus ; Anthicide (Fadr., Oliv , Latr.) Cleride, Fabr. Cerocoma; Meloide. Meloide (Fabr., Oliv., Latr.) Staphylinus ; Staphylinide. Staphylinide (Zzm., G»c.) Necydalis ; Telephoride. Cerambycide (Zinn., Oliv., Fadbr.): Oedemeride (adr. ) . 52. Meloe; Meloide. Meloide (Zznun., &c.) DISCREPANCIES IN RECENT LISTS OF LEPIDOPTERA. BY W. F. KIRBY, ENGLAND. The opponents of the law cf priority in nomenclature have taken occasion, both in England and America, to argue against the restoration of obsolete names, on the ground that the names employed in my Catalogue of Diurnal Lepidoptera do not always harmonize with those used in Staudinger’s Catalogue of European Lepidoptera. Although this. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 197 argument looks plausible at first sight, a little reflection will probably convince many that it is baseless) We may leave genera out of the question now, as Staudinger has not attempted to grapple with the difficulties which they present; but as regards species, it must be remembered—rst, that Staudinger starts from 1758, instead of 1767, and that I should have done the same had I investigated the question fully when I commenced my work; and 2nd, that Staudinger, working at European Lepidoptera only, was necessatily better acquainted with the special literature relating to them than myself. Had I selected 1758, and possessed Werneburg’s Beitrage zur Schmetterlings kunde at the time I was writing my own Catalogue, or had Staudinger’s new Catalogue been published in time for me to verify the references contained in it, I think I may say that many of the alleged discrepancies would have disappeared, although, in some cases, I may have made use of materials which Staudinger does not appear to have employed, or may have seen reason to disagree with him as to the determination of certain species. Unless two authors have exactly the same materials to work with, or one copies from the other, no rules will be sufficient to insure their absolute agree- ment in every case; but by the strict law of priority, the chances of disagreement are reduced to a minimum. MICRO - LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. (Continued from page 170.) ANTISPILA. A. ampelopsisella. WN. sp. In the preceding paper on this genus I mentioned that I had found the larva of this species mining the leaves of Ampelopsis quinquefolia. Since that paper was placed in the hands of the Editor, many months ago, I have succeeded in rearing it from the mine.* ~ * The specimen mentioned in that paper as having been bred from the Long- _ worth grape-vine, is now too much denuded for satisfactory comparison with this species, but I believe it to be the same ; certainly it is not any of the other known American species, and I have never met with it except in the Longworth grape leaf. 198 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. It is much smaller than any of the previously described species of this country, measuring only »*s of an inch a@/ar ex., whilst cornifoliella is larger Y%, Isabella a little larger still, and Viticordifoliclla is scant 4%. But it differs still more decidedly by having an almost lunate, rather large snow- white streak extending along the base of the dorsal ciliae nearly to the apex. The distinctions between the described American species are as follows: The fascia and dorsal spot in zsabe//a are wider than in corni- foliella. Tsabella has the palpi white and the anterior feet yellowish, with brown annulations. Dr. Clemens is in error when he says that it is without violet and greenish reflections ; I find it shows them about as in cori- foliella. Inall the species I should call the fascia silvery rather than golden, though it certainly is tinged with golden. J/sadc//a has the antennz brown, with faint purplish reflections in some lights; the basal joint is pale ochreous yellow, but the terminal joint is of the general hue. In cornifoliella the stalk appears a little darker, and the terminal joint is white. The head in zsabel/a can scarcely be said to be golden, as Dr. Clemens describes it, but has metallic hues; it appears to be like the fascia, silvery tinged with golden, though in some lights it appears to be brown. I have not been able to detect any appreciable differences between the fore feet of these two species. The face of cornifoliella is more decidedly brown and less metallic than that of zsaded/a, and the palpi are somewhat darker. The most striking differences are in the size and form of the fascia. Viticordifoliclla differs from both ¢sabella and cornifoliella in the fascia, which, however, resembles that of zsade//a, except that it is narrower on the costa. The costal and dorsal white spots in wéticordifoliella are much more nearly regular triangles than in the other two species, in which they approach the trapezoidal form, and the costal spot is relatively smaller than the dorsal and a little further back, but the most striking difference is that the wings of witicordifolid/a are more of a dead brown hue, the violet and bronzy green reflections being much less distinct. Its anterior tarsi are silvery white, and the head and palpi silvery tinged with yellowish. Avmpelopsiella has the palpiwhite ; face and head silvery, the face with a blue tinge ; antenne dark purple brown, with the tip white ; fascia much as in cornifoliella; costal and dorsal spots rather as in vif7- cordifoliella, but its most distinguishing mark is the curved white spot or streak along the dorsal ciliz. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 199 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO. The annual meeting of the above society was held (by the kind permission of the Provost) in the library of Trinity College, Toronto, on ‘the 23rd of September, at 3:30,p.m. The report of the Secretary- Treasurer was presented, showing a slight increase of membership and a satisfactory condition of the finances, after which the President read his annual address, which was, by request of those present, kindly placed at the disposal of the Printing Committee for publication. The following officers were then elected :-— President, Rev'd C. J. S. Bethune, M. A., Port Hope ; Vice-President, R. V. Rogers, Kingston ; Secretary-Treasurer, J. H. McMechan, London ; Council—E. Baynes Reed, W. Saunders, Rev'd G. M. Innes, J. M. Denton, London ; G. J. Bowles. Montreal. Editor of ENromo ocist, W. Saunders. Editing Committee—Rev'd C. J. S. Bethune, M. A.; E. Baynes Reed; J.G. Bowles. Library Committee—W. Saunders, E. Baynes Reed, J. H. McMechan. Auditors—Chas. Chapman and J. H. Griffiths, London. CORRESPONDENCE. BRIEF NOTICE OF MR. STRECKER’S LAST ISSUE (No. IO.) The number bears the date of May, but its issue is certainly later, -copies having been sent to subscribers in August; its exact date is therefore uncertain. It contains brief descriptions of some supposed new species of moths, besides its curious account of North American Lyceene, and pretty plate. The description of AZacroglossa fumosa is in so far objectionable as Mr. Strecker is ignorant that all the allied species have, on emerging from the pupa, a light clothing of scales on the pellucid portion of the wings (see Ann. N. Y. Lyc., Vol. 8, and Lintner’s N. Y. State Reports) which is easily brushed off. Sphinx eremitoides is very probably S. Zugens Walk. Catocala magdalena is C. illecta Walk. (my No. 37). Catocala aspasia is apparently C. Arizona, the description, so far as it goes, corresponding, with allowances for Mr. Strecker’s “ scarlet” hind wings. A. R. GROTE. 200 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. PuRCHASE OF INSEcTs.—It often happens that an Entomologist is at a loss to procure specimens of certain rare species that he desires for purposes of study or to complete a series in his cabinet; he has seen them, perhaps, in the collection of a friend, or read of them in some publication, but is unable to obtain them for himself: We are glad to find that a provision has been made for such cases by the establishment of the “ Philadelphia Agency” for the sale of specimens of insects; it is under the management of Mr. J. H. Ridings (518 South 13th Street,) and is evidently in close connection with the American Entomological Society. The Agency not only sells to purchasers, issuing price-lists of J 8 Yi y Ss | species from time to time,-but also receives and disposes of collections from individuals upon commission. The names, moreover, of all insects sold by the Agency are guaranteed to be correct. We would recommend any of our friends who desire to procure rare and beautiful specimens, to send to the Agency for a price-list. BOOKS RECHT V ED. On the Noctuidz of North America, by Aug. R. Grote; from the 6th Report of the Peabody Academy of Science, Salem, Mass., 1874, pp. 18. Descriptions of New North American Phalnidz and Phyllopoda, by A. 8. Packard, jr., ibid, pp. 19- On the Transfor mations of the Common House Fly, with notes on allied forms, by A, 8. Packard, jr. M. D. ; from Proc Boston Soc. Nat, Hist., Feb., 1874, pp. 16, one plate, Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Nat. Sciences, Vol, ii, Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, vol. xvi, part iii, Jan. & Feb,, nate iv, Feb. to April, 1874. Report of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, June to October. Proceedings of the Convention of the American Association of Breeders of Short Horns. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, October—December, 1873, and Jan., Feb. and March, 1874. Report of the Council of the Agricultural and Arts Association of Ontario for 1873; Prize List of do for 1874, Additions to the Library of the Linnaean Society, London, Eng., pp. 25. | The Observer of Nature, Lawrence, Kansas, vol. i, Nos, 1 and 2. Entomology in Missouri, by Prof, C. V. Riley, from the American Naturalist, March and April, 1874, pp. 10. The Zoologist and Newman’s Entomologist, May to September ; from Mr. Reeks, Science Gossip to September, Nature to Oct. 1, The Horticulturist, N. Y., to Aug. The American Agriculturist to July, The Prairie Farmer, Chicago, The Canada Farmer, 'voronto, to July 15, The Maine Farmer, Augusta, Me. The Journal of Education, Toronto, to July. The Indiana Farmer, Indianapolis, Le Naturaliste Canadien, Quebec, to July, Journal of Education to Sept., 1874. Che Canadian Entomologist, VOL. VI. LONDON, ONT., NOVEMBER, 1874. No. 11 ON ENTOMOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. BY JOHN L. LECONTE, M. D., PHILADELPHIA. Part I—On the Law of Priority. Im Ganzen—haltet euch an Worte ! GoETHE.* The discussions upon the subject of nomenclature in Zoology, and especially in the department of Entomology, have recently become very perplexing to American students. Many who have been unable either by want of time or lack of opportunity, to consult old works, which are to be found in but few libraries, are called upon suddenly to decide for themselves, whether they will or will not adopt changes in the names of some of the most familiar and best known objects. To all such I have but two words of advice : Resist innovation, unless the innovator presents to you the reasons for his proposed change, with such force as to convince your judgment. Disregard the Mephistophelean counsel, in the motto above cited. Use the words only to acquire and convey accurately your knowledge of ‘Azngs ; but never believe that the word is superior to the thing which it represents. Thus will you avoid scholasticism, one of the great abysses of thought into which the seeker after truth is liable to fall. With a view to guide the thoughts of those of my readers who have paid heretofore but little attention to this very troublesome subject, in such manner that they may be able to form independent opinions, I have endeavored in this essay to place briefly before them the canons upon which all action in regard to nomenclature are at the present time supposed to be based. And to these canons I have appended short * On words let your attention centre. B. Taylor’s Faust, i, i10. 202 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. commentaries on the method in which I think they should be executed, in order that we may arrive at permanent and unchangeable results. | These canons, as I would express them, are as follows : 1. The binominal system of nomenclature is the only one to be recognized: one word for the genus, and another for the species, to indicate each object. 2. Linnzeus was the author of the binominal system. a science make it practicable. This law renders inviolable the name of every species which has been properly published, and the name of every genus properly defined and exemplilied by one or more species. 4. The great number of the organic beings subjected to study has made it necessary,in order to avoid confusion,to increase the binominal name by adding the authority upon which the name either in whole or part rests. 5. In the formation of new names, reference is to be had to classical construction and to the ordinary proprieties of social intercourse. Since the binominal system is of modern invention, being indeed scarcely more than a century old, and was only gradually introduced even by its author, it is obvious that none of these fundamental canons existed in the minds of the founders of Zoology, and that the appreciation of the necessity of such ordinances has become apparent only in consequence of the confusion occasioned by their non-existence. The old codes of rules, Philosophia Botanica of Linnzeus, and its imitation, Philosophia Entomologica of Fabricius, do not cover many of the most perplexing cases which have since arisen under these four rules, although, if acted on in good faith, they would have prevented mach of the confusion since produced. Concerning the two old codes I have at present nothing to say, the exhaustive commentary on the rules of Linnzus in the introduction to the Nomenclator Zoologicus of Agassiz, leaving, in fact, nothing to be desired. It is therefore apparent that in applying the four canons, their influence must, like all retro-active laws, commence at certain arbitrary periods, to be determined, not by the judgment of individual investigators, but by 3. The law of priority must be adhered to, so far as the interests of i a a THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 203 the same authority which fixes the principles themselves, that is: the common consent, expressed in a more or less formal manner, of the majority of those engaged in systematic study relating to the improvement of classification. Now, the rst and 2nd canons have been already put in execution by the rule adopted by the British Association, and reaffirmed by the Association of American Naturalists and Geologists, as follows : “Rule II[. The Committee are of opinion, after much deliberation, that the XIIth edition of the Systema Nature is that to which the limit of time should apply, viz., 1766.” This rule was adopted after much discussion regarding the respective claims of the roth and the r2th edition to be considered as the basis of the system, and I think for wise and sufficient reasons. However that may be, there is no room now for individual difference of action ; it isa law, and must be obeyed by all good citizens in the Republic of Science, until modified or abrogated by an authority equal to that which enacted it. The third canon respecting the law of priority is also formulated in several rules of the British and American code, but in such manner as to render its application somewhat difficult. The following considerations seem to me of sufficient importance to require a definite decision, when the next opportunity occurs for formal action. 1. Itis obvious, on an examination of the works of the earlier authors in Entomology, that they did not attach the same value to the fixity of nomenclature that circumstanees have since rendered necessary. Linnzus changed apparently without cause several of the specific names from the roth to the 12th edition. Previous to that time, he used the generic names in different senses, in different editions, without any explanations. Geoffroy described genera without reference to genera previously established by Linnzeus. Fabricius did the same with regard to Geoffroy, and alsoin some instances changed his genera from 1775 to 1787, without reason, or even reference to the earlier name. It is not until we come to Olivier that we find in Entomology the law of priority appearing ; and not then as a matter of principle, so much as a courtesy due to the earlier describer. I would therefore respectfully submit, 1st, that a rigorous application of the law of priority to those authors who did not act in accordance with it, will lead to much confusion; and it would probably be better, in all 204 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. doubtful cases, to restrict its operation to the time since the commencement of Olivier’s part of the Encyclopedie Methodique, and to accept his decision as final on all cases up to that time, in the same way that the 12th edition of Linnzeus is accepted as final on the question of binominal nomenclature. 2. If the authors anterior to the 12th edition are ruled out because of the imperfection of the binominal method up to that time, it would surely be consistent to exclude those after that time who failed to recog- nize its necessity. Species cannot, of course, be cited from them, for they gave no specific names ; but I will go farther, and say that genera ought not to be attributed to them, except so far as to quote them in synonymy for their generic ideas, which were brought into harmony with the system of nomenclature by subsequent authors. They will live in the literature of the science in synonymy, but they have taken no part in the formation of the names of the objects, by which alone we know them and can speak of them, and therefore should not appear as authorities. The proper application of the fourth canon is attended with still greater difficulty, and I fear that the two sets of opinions regarding the authority to be placed after the binominal name are absolutely irrecon- cilable. The arguments in favor of the original describer of the species on the one hand, and of the author of the binominal combination adopted on the other hand, are equally strong, perhaps, as regards the convenience of science, and each side has been argued with the utmost ability. I have therefore nothing to say on the subject in the way of argument, and suspect that for some time it must be left to the discretion of each student to decide under which system he can work best. Practically I do not regard it as a matter of any consequence, if each person will dzstinctly declare in his work which system he uses. The number of instances in which any confusion can result are few, and the synonymy in catalogues which are always at hand will at once resolve the doubt. I may be permitted to observe, however, that clearer views of the respective merits of the two methods would prevail, and possibly even some harmonious result more speedily be obtained, if the arguments involved less discussion of purely personal interests. It would seem from some expressions of opinion I have seen, but which I forbear to refer to more definitely, that there are those that believe that one main object of descriptive natural history is to give the authors a sort of proprietary ad THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 205 interest in the species to which they affix names. The two methods of reference to authors would lead, therefore, on the one hand, to hasty and vague descriptions of species, on the other to arbitrary and unnecessary changes in genera. Such ideas are really aspersions on the motives of the great professors of unremunerative labor, upon whom science chiefly depends for her advancement. The good and true laborers are many ; the small and mean minds, who feel honored at being quoted even in synonymy, are few. _I think, therefore, that the harm to be done by adhering to either of the two methods is greatly exaggerated. I would prefer to believe that the somewhat passionate line of argu- ment occasionally indulged in, arises rather from a mental fault which is too common in this age, which prevails in all classes and in all pursuits —the undue importance given to the claiming of supposed rights, over the performance of fixed and definite duties. Of clamor for rights, even in countries where there is no cppressing class, we hear a great deal; of appeals for the rigid keeping of obligations we hear very little. It is the privilege, with the facilities for publication now afforded by learned societies, of every careful observer of nature to contribute valuable material for the progress of the branch of science which he is capable of cultivating. // 7s Ais duty to put his contributions to knowledge in such a form as to be most easily available to his brothers in science. Whether his name remains connected permanently with his observation or not is a matter of small importance; he has done his duty in increasing the power of work of his colleagues. In this connection I would observe that it is only in descriptive Natural History, the lowest and most routine work that a man of science has to perform, that any association of names with results is possible. In all other and higher departments of knowledge, such as Newton with gravitation, Young with light, Franklin with atmospheric electricity, Faraday, Henry, Arago, Ampere and Jacobi with dynamical electricity, Agassiz with glacial action; or, to exemplify from our own departments, Linnzus, Jussieu, Cuvier and Geoffroy, all these men are historically eminent for their labors, far more than for attaching their names to the objects of their study. With suchexamples of high and honest effort,to be imitated byus in proportion to our respective abilities, it is surely an ignoble ambition, and certainly an uncommon one, that would aim at distinction by having the name printed in association with a weed, or a bug, or a bone. The multitude of new objects is the great curse of Natural History at the present time. When they are nearly all described and named, so 206 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. that they may be recognized, a period of more rapid and healthy progress willcommence. ‘The attention of the lovers of nature will then be free to observe the habits and to study more minutely the structure of the different species. Classification and economic science will advance together to the perfection which will reward the future students. One more subject remains to be treated, and I have done. It is one that I approach with hesitation, and even with pain. The recom- mendations contained in the British American Code, for the future guidance of naturalists in respect to nomenclature, are carefully drawn,and if faithfully and prudently regarded, would leave nothing to be desired. Unfortunately, under the influence of personal peculiarities, the excite- ment of political struggles, or the uncongeniality of religious associations, the contributors to scientific literature are sometimes led to forget the laws of good breeding, which are binding upon all civilized men, and should be particularly so upon those addicted to so ncble a pursuit as the study of nature. Under these exaltations of brain, names are sometimes proposed which are offensive* in the highest degree. It is useless to reason with such persons on the impropriety of their conduct, or the irrelevancy of proclaiming opinions which have no place in science, for their minds are occluded against all such appeals to their better nature. What shall be done with such names? It is a question which concerns not only the systematist, but every collector, every writer, indeed, who may have occasion to use-an illustration fiom Natural History. I therefore invite the fullest and most democratic expression of opinion. INSECTS AND FLoweErs.—lI have observed this spring that the bees extract honey from the flowers of the [Visteria by drilling a hole through the calyx. I have seen the big bumble-bees drilling the holes, and the honey-bees making use of these holes. Whether the latter have strength to bore the holes I am not sure; but it is curious that they should not treat the honeysuckle in the same way. It would be easier to pierce the corolla of that flower than the tough calyx of Wisteria, and it would yield a more abundant supply of nectar. No doubt there is some reason why they do not, and perhaps you can inform me what it is.—C. 7! zn Science Gossip. * [The author here evidently alludes to such names as Pleocoma Staff, Eudae- monia Jehovah and others of the same nature. | THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 207 ON THE INSECTS MORE PARTICULARLY ASSOCIATED WITH SARRACENIA VARIOLARIS (Spotted Trumpet-Leaf.)* BY CHAS. V. RILEY, ST. LOUIS, MO. The insect-catching powers of those curious plants, the Fly-traps (Dionea), the Sun-dews (Drosera) and the Trumpet-leaves (Sarracenia) have always attracted the attention of the curious, but renewed interest has been awakened in them by virtue of the interesting experiments and observations on their structure, habit and function, that have lately been recorded, and especially by the summing up of these observations in some charming papers by Prof. Asa Gray, which recently appeared in Zhe Nation and The New York Tribune, under the title of “ Insectivorous Plants.” Through the courtesy of Dr. J. H. Mellichamp, of Bluffton, and of H. W. Ravenel, of Aiken, S. C., who have sent me abundant material, I am able to submit the following notes of an entomojogical bearing, on the Spotted Trumpet-leaf (Sarracenia variolaris), which must henceforth rank with the plants of the other genera mentioned as a consummate insect catcher and devourer. The leaf of Sarracenia is, briefly, a trumpet-shaped tube, with an arched lid, covering, more or less completely, the mouth. The inner surface, from the mouth to about midway down the funnel, is covered with a compact, decurved pubescence, which is perfectly smooth and velvety to the touch, especially as the finger passes downward. From midway it is beset with retrorse bristles, which gradually increase in size till within a short distance of the bottom, where they suddenly cease, and the surface is smooth. There are also similar bristles under the lid. Running up the front of the trumpet is a broad wing with a hardened or ventral side border, parting at the top and extending around the rim. Along this border, as Dr. Mellichamp discovered, but especially for a short distance inside the mouth, and less conspicuously inside the lid, there exude drops of a sweetened, viscid fluid, which, as the leaf matures, is replaced by a white, papery, tasteless, or but slightly sweetened sedi- ment or efflorescence ; while at the smooth bottom of the pitcher is secreted a limpid fluid possessing toxic or inebriating qualities. * Read before the American Assuciation for the Advancement of Science, at the late meeting at Hartford. 208 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. The insects which meet their death in this fluid are numerous and of all orders. Ants are the principal victims, and the acidulous properties which their decomposing bodies give to the liquid doubtless render it all the more potent as a solvent. Scarcely any other Hymenoptera are found in the rotting mass, and it is an interesting fact that Dr. Mellichamp never found the little nectar-loving bee or other Mellifera about the plants. On one occasion only have I found in the pitcher the recogniz- able remains of a Bombus, and on one occasion only has he found the honey-bee captured. Species belonging to all the other orders are captured, and among the larger species that I have most commonly met with, which, from the toughness of their chitinous integument, resist disorganization and remain recognizable, may be mentioned Asaphes memnonius and LHuryomia melancholica among Coleoptera, Pentatoma lugens and Orsilochus variabilts, var. complicatus among Heteroptera ; while katydids, locusts, crickets, cockroaches, flies, moths, and even butterflies, and some Arachidna and Myriapoda, in a more or less irrecognizable condition, frequently help to swell the unsavory mass. But while these insects are decoyed and macerated in order, as we may naturally infer, to help support the destroyer, there are, nevertheless, two species which are proof against its siren influences and which, im turn, oblige it either directly or indirectly to support them. The first is Xanthoptera semicrocea Guen., a little glossy moth, which may be popularly called the Sarracenia moth. ‘It is strikingly marked Fig. 25. with gray-black and straw-yellow, the colors being sharply separated across the shoulders and the middle of the front wings. This little moth walks with perfect impunity over the inner surface of the pitcher, which proves so treacherous to so many other insects. It is frequently found in pairs within the pitchers soon after these open, in the early part of the season or about the end of April. The female lays her eggs singly, near the mouth of the pitcher, and the young XANTHOPTERA SEMICROCKA, —a, - . enlarged, the natural size, indicate a larva, from the moment of hatching, spins OM deep Maclin pam form, for itself a carpet of silk, and very soon with wings closed, closes up the mouth by drawing the rims together and covering them with a delicate, gossamer-like web, which effectually debars all small outside intruders. It then frets the leaf THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 209 within, commencing under the hood and feeding downward on the cellular tissue, leaving only the epidermis. As it proceeds, the lower part of the pitcher above the putrescent insect collection becomes packed with ochreous excrementitious droppings, and by the time the worm has attained its full size the pitcher above these droppings generally collapses. This worm, when full grown, is beautifully banded transversely with white and purple or lake red, which Dr. Mellichamp poetically likens in brightness to the Tyrian dye. It is furthermore characterized by rows of tubercles, which are especially prominent on the four larger legless joints. It is a half looper, having but six prolegs, and keeps up, in travelling, a constant, restless, wavering motion of the head and thoracic joints, recalling paralysis agitans. The chrysalis is formed in a very slight cocoon, usually just above or within the packed excrement. ‘The species, kindly determined by Mr. A. R. Grote, was many years ago figured by Abbot, who found it feeding on Sarracenia variolaris, in Georgia. Guenée’s descriptions were made from these figures, for which reason I have made some descriptive notes from the living material.* The species feeds alike on S. variolaris and S. flava, and there are at least two broods each year, the first brood of larve being found during the early part of May, the second toward the end of June, and disappearing with the dying of the leaves. The second species is a still more invariable living accompaniment of both kinds of Sarracenia mentioned. By the time the whitish efflorescence shows around the mouth of the pitcher, the moist and macerated insect remains at the bottom will be found to almost invariably contain a single whitish, legless grub or “gentle,” about as large round as a goosequill, tapering to the retrac- tile head, which is furnished with g.o.ooy Oe eee two curved, black, sharp hooks, ce, fly, the hair lines showing average natural lengths ; d,enlarged head and first joint of larva, ay . showing curved hooks, lower lip (g), and pro- truncated and concave at the PT thoracic spiracle ; e, end of body of same, show- i 3 ing stigmata (7) and prolegs and vent ; A, tarsal terior end of the body claws of fly with protecting pads ; 7, antenna of " same. All enlarged. This worm riots in the putrid insect remains, and when fed upon them to repletion, bores through the leaf just above the petiole and burrows * These will be found in the Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science. 210 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. into the ground. Here it contracts to the pupa state, and in a few days issues as a large two-winged fly, which I have described (/oc. cit.) as Sarcophaga sarracenie—the Sarracenia Flesh-fly. The immense prolificacy of the flesh-flies, and the fact that the young are hatched in the ovaries of the parent before they are deposited by her on tainted meat and other decomposing or strong-smelling substances, have long been known to entomologists, as has also the rapid develop- ment of the species. The viviparous habit among the Muscide is far more common than is generally supposed, and I have even known it to occur with the common house-fly, which normally lays eggs. It is also possessed by some (Estridz, as I have shown in treating of Estrus ovis, the Sheep Bot-fly,* , But the propensity of the larve for killing one another, and their ability to adapt themselves to different conditions of food supply are not sufficiently appreciated. I have long since known, from extensive rearing of parasitic Tachinidz, that when, as is often the case, a half dozen or more eggs are fastened to some caterpillar victim only large enough to nourish one to maturity, that they all hatch and commence upon their common prey, but that the weaker eventually succumb to the strongest and oldest one, which finds the juices of his less fortunate brethren as much to his taste as those of the victimized caterpillar. Or, again, that where the food supply is limited in quantity, as it often is and must be with insects whose larve are parasitic or sarcophagus, such larvae have a far greater power of adapting themselves to the conditions in which they find themselves placed, than have herbivorous species under like circum- stances. Both these characteristics are strongly illustrated in Sarcophaga sarracenie. Several larvae, and often upward of a dozen, are generally dropped by the parent fly within the pitcher ; yet a fratricidal warfare is waged until usually but one matures, even where there appears macerated food enough for several. And if the Xanthoptera larva closes up the mouth of the pitcher ere a sufficient supply of insects have been captured to properly nourish it, this Sarcophaga larva will nevertheless undergo its transformations, though it sometimes has not strength enough to bore its way out, and the diminutive fly escapes from the puparium, only to find itself a prisoner unless deliverance comes in the rupture or perforation of the pitcher by the moth larva or by other means. _ This rupturing of the L — * Ist Mo., Ent. Rep., p. 165. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 211 pitcher does not unfrequently take place, for Dr. Mellichamp writes under date of June 27, as follows: ‘ Most old leaves now examined—I might almost say all-—instead of being bored, seem ripped or torn, as if by violence, apparently from without. You see occasionally shreds of the leaf hanging. Surely the legless larva of Sarcophaga cannot do this ! What then—toads, or frogs, or crawfish abounding in these moist, pine lands? or rather is not the fat maggot the occasion of the visits of the quail, which lately I have observed here?” These two insects are the only species of any size that can invade the death-dealing trap with impunity while the leaf is in full vigor, and the only other species which seem at home in the leaf are a minute pale mite belonging apparently to /olothyrus in the Gamasidz, and which may quite commonly be found crawling within the pitcher; and a small Lepi- dopterous leaf-miner, which I have not succeeded in rearing. There must, however, be a fifth species, which effectually braves the dangers of the bottom of the pit, for the pupa of Sarcophaga is sometimes crowded with a little Chalcid parasite, the parent of which must have sought her victim while it was rioting there as larva. No other insect, so far as we now know, can crawl up the slippery belt, but tumble into the tube and there meet their death. Certain questions very naturally present themselves here: First, What gives the flesh-fly more secure foothold on the slippery pubescence than the common house-fly exhibits? Second, What enables the larva of the flesh-fly to withstand the solvent property of the fluid which destroys so many other insects? ‘Third, What gives the Sarracenia moth and its larva similar security? I can only offer, in answer, the following suggestions: The last joint of the tarsus of the common house-fly has two movable, sharp-pointed claws, and a pair of pads or “ pulvilli.” These pads were formerly supposed to operate as suckers, and all sorts of sensational accounts of this wonderful sucker have been given by popular writers, who forgot that there are any number of minute insects having no such tarsal apparatus, which are equally indifferent to the laws of gravita- tion so far as walking on smooth, upright surfaces, or on the ceiling, is concerned. In reality, these pads are thickly beset on the lower surface with short hairs, most of which terminate in a minute expansion kept continually moist by an exuding fluid—a sort of perspiration. Take the soft human hand, moistened by perspiration or other means, and draw it, with slight pressure, first over a piece of glass or other highly-polished surface, and then over something that has a rougher surface, such as a 212 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST planed board, a papered wall, or a velvety fabric, and you will experience: much greater adhesion to the smoother objects, and may understand the: important part which these moist pads play in the locomotion of the fly. They also act, in part, like the cushions of a cat’s paw in protecting and preventing abrasion of the claws, which are very useful on the rougher surfaces, where the pads are less serviceable. Now, compared with Musca domestica, the claws of Sarcophaga sarra- cenie are much the longest and strongest, and the pads much the largest, presenting three or four times the surface. These differences are, I think, sufficient to explain the fact that while the common fly walks with slippery and unsteady gait on the smooth pubescence (the retrorse nature of this pubescence sufficiently explaining the downward tendency of the movement), its sarcophagus congener manages to get a more secure footing ; for not only does the latter present a larger adhesive surface, but the longer claws are more likely to reach beyond the pubescence and the bristles, and fasten to the cellular tissue of the leaf beyond. Moreover,. Sarcophaga is more thickly beset with stiff, spinous bristles than Musca,. and Dr. Mellichamp says that when disturbed it buzzes violently about, just as if an animated sheep-bur had fallen into the tube—not apt to go down, because it will hitch and stick, and finaily, by main force, it generally emerges, but once in a while also succumbs. In answer to the second question I can only say that there is nothing exceptional in the power of the larva to withstand the solvent quality of the fluid ; it is, on the contrary, in accordance with the facts known of many species of Muscide and (Estridz, some of which, like the well-known horse bot, revel in a bath of chyme, while others are at ease in the intestinal heat of other warm-blooded animals. It is also well known that they will often live for hours in strong liquids, such as alcohol and tur-- pentine. In answer to the third question, the meth is doubtless assisted im walking within the tube by the spines and spurs on the legs, which it, in common with most other moths, possesses—the tarsi in Xanthoptera being armed with spines, and the spurs being quite long, and_ in isemicrocea usually shod at tip with a corneous point. Its larva overcomes the treacherous surface by either carpeting it with silk or destroying it. CONCLUSION, To one accustomed to seek the why and wherefore of things, the inquiry very naturally arises as to whether Xanthoptera and Sarcophaga THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 213 play any necessary or important role in the economy of Sarracenia. ‘Speaking of the Sarcophaga larva, Mr. Ravenel asks, ‘‘ May he not do some service to Sarracenia as Pronuba does to Yucca?” And if so, may not all this structure for the destruction of insects be primarily for his benefit? Can he be merely an intruder, sharing the store of provision which the plant, by ingenious contrivance, has secured for itself, or is hea welcome inmate and profitable tenant? Self-fertilization does not take place in Sarracenia, and the possibility that the bristly flesh-fly aids in the important act of pollination, lends interest to the facts. No one has witnessed with greater pleasure than myself the impulse which Darwin has of late years given to such inquiries ; but we should be cautious lest the speculative spirit impair our judgments or ability to read the simple lesson of the facts. My own conclusions summed up are : First: There is no reason to doubt, but every reason to believe, since the observations of Dr. Mellichamp, that Sarracenia is a truly insectivorous plant, and that by its secretions and structure it is eminently fitted to capture its prey. Second: That those insects most easily digested (if I may use the term), and most useful to the plant, are principally ants and small flies, which are lured to their graves by the honeyed path, and that most of the larger insects, which are not attracted by sweets, get in by accident and fall victims to the peculiar mechanical structure of the leaf. Third: ‘Yhat the only benefit to the plant‘is from the liquid manure resulting from the putrescent captured insects. [Mr. Ravenel, in making a transverse section near the base of the young leaf, noticed large tubular cells passing down through the petiole into the root, and much of the liquid manure may possibly pass through these into the root stalk. ] fourth: That Sarcophaga is a mere intruder, the larva sponging on and sharing the food obtained by the plant, and the fly attracted thither by the strong odor, as it is to all putrescent animal matter or to other plants, like Stafelia variegata, which give forth a similar odor. ‘There is nothing to prove that it has anything to do with pollination, and the only insect that Dr. Mellichamp has observed about the flowers with any frequency, isa Cetonid beetle—the Zuryomia melancholica, which, with other species of its genus, is commonly found on many different flowers. fifth: That Xanthoptera has no other connection with the plant than that of a destroyer, though its greatest injury is done after the leaf has 214 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. performed its most important functions. | Almost every plant has its peculiar insect enemy, and Sarracenia, with all its dangers to insect life generally, is no exception to the rule. Sexth: That neither the moth nor the fly have any structure peculiar to them that enables them to brave the dangers of the plant, beyond what many other allied species possess. PRELIMINARY CATALOGUE OF THE NOCTUID& OF CALIFORNIA. Parl ie BY AUG. R. GROTE, Curator of Articulata, Buffalo Soc. of Natural Sciences. Io. Agrotis Cochraniti Riley. (See ante p. 155). The specimens are hardly to be distinguished from Eastern material ; they are perhaps a little larger, and of a little different tone of color. My determination of this species as Zycarum H.-S., based on a figure, is probably incorrect. It seems possible that Harris has described A. Cochranii under the name messoria, which should then be retained. More material of A. fuscigerus (ante No. 15) shows that this is a good but variable species, both in size and color. ‘There is always a uniformity in the disposition of the ground tint over the primaries above, and usually the broad inner lunulations of the t. p. line and the median shade are characteristic. | Some specimens have the hind wings of a pale yellowish testaceous, with double subterminal shade lines visible. 79. Dianthoecia niveiguttata (Grote). (Ante p. 156.) In my $ specimen the ovipositor is apparently broken off. 28. £50- California, Mr. Behrens, No. ro (red label). 37. Hadena albina Grote, |. c. p. 157. > California, Mr. Behrens ; Sauzalito, May 15th, No. 78. 38. Hadena curvata Grote, |. c. p. 157. California, Mr. Behrens, Nos. 70 and 99. 39. Hadena divesta Grote. A moderate, slender bodied species, resembling somewhat in its colors Dianthoecia pensilis. Eyes naked; abdomen strongly tufted dorsally. Fore wings dark gray, with the basal field shaded with carneous ochrey ; a patch above the submedian dash and extending between the spots, and the subterminal line shaded with the same color. There is a narrow black basal ray. Ordinary spots large and wide, concolorus, the blackish median shade marked on costal region between them. Median space wide, owing 216 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. to the outward removal of the t. p. line; the latter somewhat as in Z. curvata, but much more removed beyond the reniform. T. p. line angulated opposite the cell, geminate, even in its course, its inner line forming a regular series of slight lunulations; the filling in of the line becomes white inferiorly. Subterminal line preceded medially by cunei- form black marks. Hind wings fuscous, darker outwardly, with a transverse shade line without the middle. Beneath fuscous, with even common line and discal spots. Expanse 32m. m. Sauzalito, Aug. 12th, Mr. James Behrens, No. 145. 40. Hadena marina Grote, List N. Am. Noct., p. 67. California, Mr. Behrens, No. 68. 41. Hadena flava Grote, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., 5. Victoria, Mr. Crotch ; Colorado, Mr. Mead. 42. Morrisonia peracuta Morr., Bull. B.S. N.S., 2, p. 114. California ? 43. Eupsephopacctes procinctus Grote, Bull. B.S. N.S., 1, p. 138, pl. 4, fig. 6. California, Hy. Edwards, Esq., No. 73; Mr. Behrens. 44. Hydroecia nictitans var. erythrostigma (Haw.) California, Mr. Behrens, July 30th, No. 165. 45. Ochria sauzalite Grote. Sauzalito, September 17th, Mr. Behrens, No. 161 ; Hy. Edwards, Esq. No: r35. This species has a distinct clypeal tubercle, and is therefore congeneric with the European flavago. It belongs to Gortyna of Lederer, but not of Hubner, whose genus is equivalent to Aydrecia “B” of Lederer, For the European flavago, I have shown that Ochria Hubn. must be retained. I have separated Wydrecia ‘‘ A.” of Lederer under Guenée’s name, butI am of opinion that for this genus, of which the type is nictitans, the term Afamea must be retained. It is not a little singular that the species which most nearly resembles /favago in America, viz., cataphracta Grote, should have no clypeal tubercle, and therefore must be referred to a different genus. In my “ List” I have erroneously referred Gortyna purpurifascia, an Eastern species without the tubercle, to Ochria, which, so far should only contain O. sauzalite. The Cal. species differs, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. rh Oe 6 from G, purpurifascia by the t. p. line being slightly arcuate superiorly. In size and ornamentation the Californian species rather resembles ruéi/a, which wants the tubercle. 46. Admetovis oxymorus Grote, Bul. B.S. N.S., 1, p. 133, pl. 4, fig. 5. Sierra Nevada, Hy. Edwards, Esq., No. 2733. 47. Heliophila pallens |Linn|. California, Mr. Behrens, No. 1o [red label]. 48. Heliophila phragmitidicola |Guenee}. Sauzalito, Sept. 25th, Mr. Behrens, No. 169. 49. Ufeus plicatus Grote, Proc. Bost. Soc. N. H., 16, p. 241. California, No. 4414, Hy. Edwards, Esq. 50. Losteropoda hirtipes Grote, List N. Am. Noct., p. 68. California, Hy. Edwards, Esq., No. 3484. MICRO -LEPIDOPTERA. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, (Continued from page 198.) AbSPIDISCA. A. diospyriella. LN. sp. This species was bred from minute mines in the leaves of Persimmon trees (Diospyros virginiana ), gathered in great abundance at the ‘‘ Bee Spring” camp of the Kentucky Geological Survey, in Edmondson County, a few miles west of the Mammoth Cave. Ihave never met with it in Northern Kentucky, where the Persimmon tree also grows, but is comparatively rare. Head and thorax, and a little more than the basal halt of the primaries pale leaden gray, with a metallic, almost silvery lustre ; antennae fuscous above, silvery fuscous below ; just behind the middle of the wing are twe 918 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. silvery streaks, one on the costal and one on the dorsal margin, the latter a very little before the former, and both strongly dark margined before and behind, their anterior dark margins meeting just behind the middle of the wing, where they are somewhat posteriorly angulated. The silvery streaks are not confluent, being separated by the anterior point of a dark brown dorsal patch, placed behind the dorsal streak. This dark brown dorsat patch is common to all species of the genus now known, and in all of them it forms the posterior margin of dorsal silvery streak, and becomes confluent with the posterior dark margin of the costal streak also; the anterior dark margins of both silvery streaks are margined faintly before with pale golden, much less distinct and covering much less space than in splendoriferela ; behind the posterior dark margin of the costal streak isa small golden patch, as in sflendoriferedia, containing a small black dorsal streak (or, perhaps more correctly, margined by it.) In perfect fresh specimens of sf/endoriferela the extreme costa in this golden spot is always more or less streaked longitudinally with dark brown scales ; these dark brown streaks are absent in this species, and besides, in sp/endoriferella- the anterior dark margins of the costal and dorsal silvery streaks are not confluent and posteriorly angulated as in this species, but are separated by a narrow golden line, which is carried backwards between the silvery streaks themselves, thus connecting the golden patch before the streaks with the costal golden spot behind the streaks ; in this species they are not so connected. Mr. Stainton,in a note on sf/endoriferel/a, in his edition of the Clemens papers, states that the silvery costal and dorsal streaks are confluent in that species. I have never found them so, but always under a good lens I find them separated by the narrow golden line as above stated. In sflendoriferella the dark brown dorsal spot is separated from the fan-shaped apical spot by a narrow projection of the costal golden spot, which extends to a small spot of silvery scales on the dorsal edge of the apical spot; but in this species this golden projection is only represented by a small golden spot, which is separated from the costal golden one by a narrow blackish line, which ‘extends from the brown dorsal spot to a small silvery spot at the beginning of the fan-shaped apical spot. As in all the other species, there is also a small silvery spot on the costal side of the fan-shaped apical brown patch, as well as one on the dorsal side, and the one at its beginning. The fan-shaped apical brown patch is traversed across its middle (between the two silvery spots) by a streak of paler brown, thus dividing it into two velvety black (rather than brown) spots. As in sf/endoriferelia, there is a narrow brown THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 219 Jine from the apex of the wing to the apex of the ciliae, and as in that species, the ciliae are yellowish rather than yellowish brown, as Dr. Clemens describes them. Dr. Clemens’ statement that in splendoriferella there is a black apical spot, with metallic scales, in its centre, also seems to me misleading ; there is only the fan-shaped apical black spot divided across its centre by a paler brown streak, at each end of which is a minute speck of silvery scales, and there is the third one at the beginning or handle of the fan-shaped spot—and this is true of all the species. I have not been able to detect separate from the brown dorsal patch what Dr. Clemens calls “a blackish brown hinder marginal line in the ciliae” in splendoriferella, unless by it is meant the brown band which crosses the fan-shaped spot ;_ but by careful observation with a lens, two such lines may be found in the dorsal brown patch, darker than the surrounding portions, but which I have not been able to detect in diospyriela. The basal portion of the wing is more silvery than in splendoriferella, and the apical portion is much less golden, so that in this species the dark brown and silvery hues prevail over the golden, while Dr. Clemens was perhaps right in calling golden the ground color of the apical part of the wing in sflendoriferella. In juglandiella the apical part of the wing is more golden than in diospyriella, but less so than in splendoriferella. It has, like diospyriella, the anterior dark margins of the two silvery streaks confluent, and the silvery streaks are separated in jugandiel/a as just described in diospyriella But, as in splendoriferelia, the golden costal patch sends off towards the dorsal ciliae and / the little silver spot which on that side margins the fan-shaped spot, a short streak which is not cut off from the rest of the golden patch by a process from the costal brown spot to the fan-shaped spot, as we have seen is the case with diospyriclla. The case of juglan- diella, like that of diospyriella, is nearly oval, whilst that of splendoriferella is rather trapezoidal. But jug/andiella is but little smaller than splendoriferella, whilst diospyriedla is but little larger than salicifoliella Some of the points of differ2nce that I have mentioned are only brought out by the use of the compound microscope. Considering the near rejiatianship of the food plants (Walnut and Hickory), it is strange that I have not sooner thought that juelandiella may be Zucifiuella Clem. It may be, though I have not been able to recognize it in Dr. Clemens’ description. Indeed, it seems to me that Zucifiuella and A. clla are nearer to each cther, though I have not been able to recognize 4. ela in Dr. Clemens’ description of Zucifuella. I 220 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST am, however, satisfied that A. e//a must either be /uciffuella or the unknown species which mines Osfrya leaves. I have bred ella frequently from cases found adhering to various trees, but I have not been able to breed. either the Hickory species (/ucijfuella) or the unknown Osérya species. A. ella must be one of these, because the thoroughness of my search satisfies me that there are no other mines of this genus to be found in this region, except those of sAéendoriferella and saliciella, which are sufficiently distinct, and both of which I have bred. If jug/andiella is lucifiuella, then ela must be the Ostrya miner. Sflendoriferella is decidedly the largest species that I have seen, but Dr. Clemens states that Zuciffuella is a little larger than it. This, however, is probably a mistake, as the cases that I have seen of /ucifuella are even smaller than those of splendoriferclla, and very greatly resemble those of A. e//a, while also the vegetable hairs on the cases of A. e//a appear to be identical with those on Hickory leaves. The minute size of diospyricila is one of the strongest reasons for considering it a distinct species. AZ. ex. sz inch. MISCELLANEOUS. DRYOCAMPA RUBICUNDA.—About four or five years ago I found a dead male specimen of this rare moth under an apple tree in our garden, and although a good deal rubbed, it was perfectly recognizable. This is, I am informed, the only instance of this moth having been taken in this city.—H. H. Lyman, Montreal, P. Q. Dr. A. S. PackarD, of Salem, Mass., is about to publish his long projected monograph of Geometrid moths, and designs giving a figure of | each species. To make the work as complete as possible, specimens of this family are earnestly desired for study, and will be carefully returned, or other specimens sent in exchange. DeaTH OF FRANCIS WaALKER.—We.have just received the sad intelligence of the death of this distinguished Entomologist, who died at his residence, Elm Hall, Wanstead, on the 5th of October. A more extended notice of him will appear in our next. | Che Canadwn Entomologist. VOL. VI. LONDON, ONT., DECEMBER, 1874. No. 12 THE LARV4Z OF DEPRESSARIA DUBITELLA AND GELECHIA RUBENSELLA. BY MARY E. MURTFELDT, KIRKWOOD, MO. Being much interested in the Tineidee, Mr. Chambers’ articles on this family of moths are the first to receive attention as the successive numbers of your magazine come to hand. I have had the satisfaction of rearing from their larvae many of the winged gems described in your pages, among others the two species named above. Now, as Mr. C. seems to have been in some doubt as to his own determination of these species, of which he has as yet—as he informs me —seen only the imagines, it occurs to me that a description of their larval characteristics might afford some aid in deciding the doubtful points. The larva of Depressaria (Gelechia) dubitella Cham. is very character- istic and beautiful. It may be found during the months of July and August on Ambrosia artemisiefolia, concealed in a fusiform case, which it constructs by drawing together the pinnatifid divisions of the leaf. I think it forms but a single case, which at first consists of but two divisions of the leaf drawn together with silken threads. As it increases in size, its domicile is enlarged by the incorporation of other lobes of the leaf. It is always to be found in its case in the daytime, and probably emerges only at night to feed. This larva is rather more than half an inch in length, elongate and slightly flattened. Head horizontal, semi-elliptical, highly polished jet black. First segment horny, black and polished like the head. Second segment, anterior half ve/vety black, posterior half ivory white, ornamented above with five linear black marks, extending longitudinally backward ; the dorsal and sub-dorsal ones do not reach to the posterior edge of the segment, while the lateral lines, above the stigmata, do. The remaining segments are of a translucent white color, varying from pearly to yellowish. They are marked with three faint, longitudinal, brown lines and with a few 229, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. minute, black, piliferous spots, each of which gives rise to a single, short, fine hair. Venter of the thoracic segments and thoracic legs black; pro- legs and under surface of abdominal segments whitish. The change to pupa usually takes place within the larvalcase. Chrysalis slender, smooth, bright reddish brown, except the head and wing sheaths, which are much darker. Mr. Riley once brought me a leaf-folding larva on Hackberry, which resembled these Ambrosia case-makers in every respect, but as I did not succeed in obtaining the imago from it, I am unable to say whether or not the insects were identical. In my specimens of duditel/a the purple-brown of the anterior wings. is marked with four ochreous spots, instead of ¢éree, as in Mr. Chambers’ description, and the hind wings are more nearly gray than fuscous. ; There is another leaf-folding larva of the same size and habit of D. dubitella, which also feeds on Ambrosia artemisiefolia, and which is even more elegantly marked in black and white than the latter. This insect, which I take to be a true but undescribed Gelechia, I may, perhaps, describe in a future paper. I would respectfully propose for it the name of Chambersella. The larva of G. rudbensefla is an external feeder on Oak. It inhabits a thin web at the base or near the tip of the leaf, and skeletonizes the upper surface of the latter. Its length is rather more than 34 of aninch. In form it is elongate and sub-cylindrical, tapering anteriorly and posteriorly from the middle, and has the sutures deep. The color is grass green, striped with numerous very fine longitudinal lines of purple, and ornamented with two sub-dorsal rows of conspicuous purple spots, situated at the sutures. Head horizontal, pale brown, pointed toward the jaws with two irregular whitish dashes on each side. Legs and prolegs pale green—the latter very narrow. This pretty larva is as characteristic in its habits as in its appearance. It does not touch the leaf except when feeding, but remains suspended in a sort of gallery of delicate web-work, through which it moves with surprising rapidity. It changes to pupa within a frail cocoon, on the surface of the ground. The chrysalis is pale brown, slender and chiefly characterized by long, free wing sheaths. |The moth issues in about ten days. In its perfect state this insect bears so close a resemblance to G. roseosuffusella Clem., that it is difficult to distinguish it from the latter. It is, however, as a rule, smaller, darker and more roseate, while the larva is entirely different, that of G. roseosuffusella mining the leaves of Clover, and being much less strikingly marked. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 223 ON ENTOMOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. BY JOHN L. LECONTE, M. D., PHILADELPHIA. Part I1.—On Generic Types. “ Tgnorato genere proprio, nulla descriptio, quamvis accurate tradita certum demonstret ; sed plerumque fallat.”—Ca:sap. apud Linn., Syst- Nat, x11, 1, 13. In the first part of this essay I endeavored to show the confusion which resulted from the application of the law of priority to the names employed in the early development of our science by persons who had no idea corresponding to the law which has since been formulated. We will now attempt to discuss the second great fallacy in the exegesis of the writings of the founders of the science ; the selection on principles, more or less arbitrary, but always opinionative, of generic types, when these have not been explicit/y mentioned by the author. With the more minute observation of differences in structure, and the consequent multiplication of genera, has arisen an idea that all classification, generic and otherwise, is simply a human contrivance for the purpose of expressing degrees of resemblance between the organic forms which we collect and recognize as distinct. In short, that our best efforts to ascertain the relations of organic beings has resulted, not in a system, but in a dictionary. This was not the idea of the fathers in science—nor is it the idea of many respectable students of the present day. The language of Linnzus is clear upon this subject. ‘ Genus et species naturz opus ;’ to him and to his followers there was no generic type. Each species comprised in the genus was equally typical, unless, as in rare cases, it was mentioned as aberrant, with a suspicion expressed in some instances that it wonld be subsequently separated as a distinct genus. When dissections were made, as in the fuller definitions in the foot notes in the works of Fabricius, it was not because the dissected species were selected peculiarly as the type of the genus (for in many instances the dissections are not part of the generic formula), but merely that the most common and available species was chosen for the purpose of giving more information than was conveyed by the condensed generic diagnosis. 224 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST In the gradual progress of science, and with the multiplication of genera, it came to be considered that the person who recognized the necessity of subdividing an ancient genus, should exercise his judgment regarding the part to which the old name should adhere ; and in most instances this was attended with no inconvenience. Rarely, as in the case of ‘TeEMNOCHILA JVw., the name of the original genus TRocossiTA was retained for a group which did not accord with the original definition ; the new name was imposed upon the set of species which should have kept the original name. ‘These instances are but few in number, and the exposure of the error committed is sufficient to cause its immediate correction. I would therefore infer that the practice of some students in recent times, of applying the older generic names in a different sense from that in which they were restricted by the persons first making the divisions, is founded upon an incorrect interpretation of what was formerly meant by a genus ; and that these old authors, were they now alive, would strongly resist the limitation of their generic idea to a single type-species. When the describer of a genus establishes the genus upon a single species, either because it is the only one known to him, or because, as is sometimes the case, he does not choose to ehumerate the others, then of course, from the accident of the case, that particular species becomes typical of the genus, and must remain so as long as the present system of nomenclature is adopted. | But when, on the other hand, several species are included in the genus, and they all agree accurately in the possession of the characters mentioned as defining the genus, they must in my opinion be regarded as equally typical. It would save mnch confusion in inter- preting the modern use made of these restricted older names, if in all instances in systematic works the restricting authority was added in parenthesis. A more difficult source of confusion is that resulting from the erroneous position ascribed to a genus, which renders it, with the ordinary usages of interpretation, absolutely irrecognizable ; as when, for instance, the Byrrhide genus AmpHycyrta was described by Mannerheim as a Tene- brionide, under the name Eucyphus, and the genus AMPHIZOA also as a Tenebrionide (Dysmathes). In these two cases Mannerheim’s names fail from want of priority, but had this not been the case, I still maintain that the names of erroneous position should be suppressed in favor of later names which may have been independently given, and correctly THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 225 defined. The genus being erroneously described, of course fails to represent any idea realized in nature, and the specific name must there- fore fall with it, and the whole name be quoted in synonymy, with the error mark ({) appended. While I fully recognize the importance of having the same object always spoken of by the same name, I must frankly say that the forced uniformity aimed at by somewhat arbitrary processes, in a few familiar instances, seems to be capable of producing still greater confusion. To take an example: our common tumble-bug is equally known to most students of entomology as CANTHON or Copropstus, and specifically as fevis or volvens, the first generic and specific names having priority. Recently, however, on the authority of Gemminger and Harold, and of Mr. Crotch, the specific name Audsonias has been resurrected from Forster's Centuria Insectorum. The priority of this last name is not borne out by any evidence in the books containing the descriptions, and if it be valid, can only be demonstrated by careful bibliographical inves- tigation of a collateral kind. It is unreasonable to expect that our familiar names for common objects, for it is only among them that such changes are likely to be suggested, should thus be altered where there can be any excuse for resisting the innovation. But I will go farther and say, that where two names have become from peculiar circumstances equally known, there can be no serious objection to the writer using that one for which he has preference. If I had occasion to write concerning the great Aristotle, it is certain that all those persons capable of under- standing what I would desire to say about him, whether I mentioned him by his name or spoke of him as the Stagyrite, or even as the Preceptor of Alexander, would know who was meant. When the different names which have been applied to the most common species, have been recognized by competent authorities as synonyms, and have been thus collated in accessible registers, catalogues or systematic works, it is not a subject worth contention which of these equally known names may be used by individual writers. Certainly it is wrong for a person, without a careful study of bibliography, to change his habit in the use of a name, because the latest authority advocates a subversion. It is by no means true in natural history that the latest is the best, and those who are not critical students in these subjects will do well to follow the advice given in the first part of this essay, to resist innovation,* until they find * Confusis enim nominibus omnia confundi necesse est.—C_esALP. apud Linn., Syst. Nat. xii, i, 13.. 226 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. that the later views are adopted by those to whom they have a right to look for instruction upon these technical points. Let them, at any rate, be clear in their minds that the changes are in accordance with the existing laws, or let them agitate for such alteration in the current code as will produce legally the modifications they desire. Other special cases may arise of still greater difficulty than those I have here discussed. For the proper solution of these, I think the suggestion of Mr. Alfred Wallace* is most valuable. It is that all disputed points in nomenclature should be referred for investigation and decision to a committee of experts. Such a committee could be readily formed in the Entomological Club of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which would dispassionately determine all questions relating to the progress of the science in North America, and announce their decisions each year. These decisions would, I am convinced, be cheerfully adopted by most, if not all of those who are occupied in the study of the insects of this continent. One more suggestion in conclusion.. It isthis: That in proportion as the objects become well known, and especially in those species which fortunately possess no synonymy, all reference to authorities should be dropped, except when Jdzbliographical reference to a full description or figure is necessary. If, however, a synonym must be mentioned, jet the author of this supplementary name be quoted. Should this suggestion be adopted, it will result that the name of the describer will not be unnecessarily connected with the valid name of the species, and one strong support of the small personal vanity which I have ‘criticized in the first part of this essay will be destroyed. Another important result will be that the maker of a synonym will know that his name will be inseparably connected with that synonym, when- ever it is mentioned; and that, therefore, so far from being an honor, or a recognition of good work, the use of an authority will come to be known as an indication of bad or imperfect work, and the makers of species on hasty study or on defective materials will be discountenanced. * Address of the President, Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1871, lxviii. bo NJ THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 2 ON SOME OF OUR COMMON INSECTS. No. 15. THE 10 MOTH—Saturnia (Hyperchiria) Lo, ¥abr. BY E. B. REED, LONDON, ONT. This lovely moth is well worthy a place in the cabinet of the collector, -and is always sure to attract notice and admiration. ‘The larva, of which fig. 27 represents a full-grown specimen, is of a most delicate apple or Fig. 27. pea green colour, with a broad, dusky white stripe at each side, bordered with lilac on the lower edge. ‘The body is covered with clusters of green bristles, tipped with black. These bristles are exceedingly sharp, and when the insect is handled, will pro- duce a very irritating sting, similar to, but much sharper than that of the nettle, and the effect of which causes a reddening of the flesh and the immediate appearance of raised white blotches, which last for a considerable time. Fig. 28 shows the appearance of these bristles, some of them, as 6, being stouter and more acute than the others, and able to inflict a sharper and more penetrating sting. According to Mr. Riley, the irritating Fig. 28. property belongs to the substance of which the spines are formed, and his opinion was strengthened by the fact that the spines of a cast off skin, which had been in his cabinet for years, still retained the irritating power. - In the earlier stages the caterpillars are gregarious, feeding together side by side, and in going to and returning from their place of shelter, moving in regular files, like the processionary caterpillars of Europe (Lasiocampa processionea). When about half grown they 228 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. disperse, each seeking a location for itself. They moult five times, devouring their cast off spinous skins. After being in the larval state about eight weeks, they arrive.at maturity, and are then about two inches and a half long. Their food plants are numerous. They have been found on Black Locust, Indian Corn, Willows, Sassafras, Wild Cherry, Elm, Hop-vine, Balsam, Balm of Gilead, Dogwood, Choke Cherry, Currant, Cotton and Clover. I, myself, this year found it on the English Filbert, and raised it to maturity on that plant. I have, however, more commonly found it on the Choke Cherry. The larva, when full grown, crawls to the ground,. where, amid the loose leaves and rubbish, it forms a rough covering, within which it makes a slight cocoon of tough, gummy, brown silk. In this. retreat a change is soon effected to the pupal or chrysalis state, and having remained therein during the winter and spring months, the moth emerges in the perfect winged state about June. The moths are especially remarkable for the difference between the sexes, both in size and colour. The male, fig. 29, which is much the smallest, is of a deep Indian or maize yellow ; on the fore wings are two oblique, wavy lines, near the hind margin, and a zigzag line near the base. There is. also a large, dark, reddish,. central reniform spot or blotch. The hind wings. are broadly shaded with purple, next to the body ;. on the hinder margin is a purplish curved band, and within this again is a smaller one of a dark purple or violet colour. In the centre of this last band and the middle of the wing is a large, round, blue spot, with a whitish centre and a broad border almost black; the under side of the wings is of the same deep: yellow ; the fore wings showing the same dark occellated spot, as on the other side, and having the inner margin broadly shaded with purple. ‘The hinder wings are more uniform in color, with a transverse purple line and a very small, distinct white spot representing the centre of the large spot on the upper side. The body is also deep yellow. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIS’. 229 The female, fig. 30, is considerably larger; the specimens vary very much in color, from a dark purplish brown to a warm ochreous red. The fore wings have similar wavy, zigzag lines ;_ the reniform blotch being less distinct than in the male ; the inner margin is of a deeper colour, and is Fig. 30. thickly coated with short hair, like the head and thorax. The hind wings are similar to those of the male; the under side has the same uniform colour, and the markings and spots as in the male. The body is the same shade as the wings, the abdomen being a little lighter in colour, and each segment being bordered with a narrow reddish band. The moths vary in size from two and a half inches in the male to three and a half in the female. The eggs are deposited on the under side of the leaf, and are described by Mr. Riley as being compressed on both sides and flattened at the apex, the attached end smallest, in colour cream white, with a small black spot on the apical end and a larger orange one on the sides. TINEINA FROM TEXAS. BY V. T. CHAMBERS, COVINGTON, KENTUCKY. A collection of Tineina received from Mr. Belfrage, of Waco, Texas, presents some points worthy of mention apart from the descriptions of the new species. The collection consists of about two hundred and fifty specimens in tolerably good condition, referable to seventy-six species and twenty-seven genera. Such a number of genera and species is evidently typical of the 230 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Tineina of the locality where they were collected. Twenty-nine of these species belong to the genus Ge/echia, and twenty-five others belong in the same family. Fifty-three of these species thus belong to the Ge/echida, and only twenty three to other genera. The Gelechide are numerous every- where, and a preponderance of species belonging to this family is to be expected in almost any collection, but I have not known any other collection in which it was so great as in this one. The collection contains seven species of Laverna, and another species which I have made the type of a new genus very nearly allied to Laverna. These seven species differ from each other somewhat as to the neuration, and also as to the raised tufts on the wings, but perhaps not to any greater degree than do well recognized species of Zaverna, as e. g. L. Staintont and ZL. langiclla of Europe. Mr. Stainton (Vat. Hist. Tin., vii) enumerates only twenty species belonging to this genus, and three others are also known from this country. ‘This collection then contains nearly one-third as many species of this genus as were heretofore known altogether. Of the species heretofore known, but one (if I rightly understand Mr. Stainton) is fairly described as white, that being the prevailing or ground color, though some others have more or less white markings. But of these seven, five may fairly be placed in the white section; and the other two are also strongly marked with white. The collection contains five species which I have placed in Butaéts, though with great doubt as to two of them, which are totally unlike all other species of the genus in color, though I have not been able to discover any structural differences whatever. But it is, perhaps, more remarkable for what it does not than for what it does contain. As before stated, such a collection is typical of the Tineina of the locality where it was collected. Yet it contains no speci- men of Lithocolletis, which, both in the collections of Dr. Clemens and myself, is the genus next most numerous in species and individuals after Gelechia. Tinea, Coleophora, Gracilaria, Bucculatrix, Tischeria and Nepticula are also genera usually numerous in species and individuals. Yet this collection contains only one Zinea, two Coleophora, no Gracilaria (unless a single species of Corisceum be held to represent it), and three ? species of Bucculatrix, one of which is a somewhat aberrant form. All of the species are new except ten. ‘These are as follows : Gelechia cercerisella Cham.., Ypsolophus eupatoriella Cham., 3 equepulvella * Plutella cruciferarum Zell, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 231 Gelechia disco-ocelella Cham. Flolocera glandulella Riley, ff roseo-suffusella Clem., Bucculatrix pomtfoliela Clem., FTagno faginella Cham., Hamadryas Basettella 2% Of these ten species, G. roseo-suffusella, judging from the number of specimens in the collection, appears to be by far the more numerous, though it may turn out that some of the specimens do not belong to this species, but to a very closely allied and undescribed one; and all the specimens are of a darker hue than those from the Northern States. This species appears to be distributed nearly all over the United States, and is perhaps the most common species of the genus. G. cercerisella was originally placed by me in Depressaria, and I was led to do this by giving too much importance to the neuration of the wings. It is, however, properly referable to Gelechia. The specimens— thirteen in number—belong to a very well marked variety. In all the specimens (a great many) that I have heretofore examined, the fore wings are marked just within the middle of the dorsal margin by some faint, short, ochreous streaks, only discernible distinctly under a lens. In these thirteen specimens these ochreous streaks are not present, and their place is occupied by a larger snow white spot, like those on the margins - of the wings. G. equepulvella is well represented in the collection, but there appears to be some variation in the shade of the ground color and in the density of the dusting. The single specimen of Holocera glandulella differs from Mr. Riley’s description as follows: there is a single discal spot behind the angulated line, and two others at the end of the cell, instead of “ two discal spots,” as stated by Mr. Riley; besides, “three tolerably distinct, dusky marks around the discal spots” are wanting. Unfortunately I have now no typical specimens of this species, with which to compare it, but I doubt not it is the same. Hlamadryas Bassettella was described by Dr. Clemens from specimens sent to him from Connecticut. He states that it appears to be.congeneric with a portion of Gelechia. The remark is applicable to almost every species of the family Gelechide. Dr. C. does not seem to have observed its very close relationship to Dasycera, nor, perhaps, its still closer relation- ship to, or even identity with the genus Pancalia. The antennae in Bassettella are stout, and the ciliation is microscopic, quite distinct in this respect from species of Dasycera. The wings of Aassettella are narrower 232 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. and the form of the secondaries is different, approaching that of Buta/is. Mr. Stainton’s figure (Ins. Brit., v. 3) represents the secondaries of D- sudphurella narrower and more pointed than are those of D. WNewmanella, but less so than those of Bassette//a. The ornamentation of D. Mewman- ella resembles that of most species of Butalis. The ornamentation of Bassettella rather resembles that of Pancalia, to which, also, I think, it makes the nearest approach structurally. flagno faginella seems to have the transverse dusky lines of the primaries darker and more distinct than in the Kentucky specimens, and those about the middle of the wing condensed into two indistinct fascia. Plutella cruciferarum pxesents nothing unusual; but there is in the collection a single specimen which I incline to consider an undescribed species. In it the lighter color of the inner margin projects into the darker part of the wing only once, and that very faintly, behind the middle of the wing; otherwise the line between the two colors is nearly straight ; the markings in the posterior portion of the costal half of the wings also differ somewhat from those of P. cruciferarum. But the specimen is: imperfect, and I shall not at present separate it from cruciferarum. From an examination of my collection of cruciferarum, I concur with Mr. Stainton’s suggestion that P. mollipedella Clem. is the female of P. cruct- Serarum. The new species are as follows : AMADRIA? Clem. A. Clemensella. LN. sp. Yellow; the palpi are a little paler, except the outer surface of the second joint. Primaries with minute brown spots arranged in transverse rows ; these require close observation : one spot on the fold and one on the end of the disc, a little larger than the others. Al. ex. %inch. There is also a row of small fuscous spots around the base of the ciliae. TINEA. ZT. obseurostrigella. LN. sp. Dark fuscous; the primaries obscurely mottled with sordid yellowish ;. there is a row of indistinct yellowish spots or streaks on the costa, from. the middle to the tip, and along the base of the dorsal ciliae. A/. ex. 1% inch. Season, October. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 233 ANESYCHIA. A. multipunctella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi dark brown, tipped beneath with scattered white scales, and with a few scattered white scales above ; third joint white, tipped beneath at the base with dark brown; face black ; vertex white, with a central black spot ; antennae fuscous ; thorax white, with six black spots, one of which is placed close to the base of the wings and is continuous with the dark brown of the wings ; two others on top, and one on each side a little before the tip. Primaries shining dark brown or black, with a wide white streak extending along the dorsal margin from the base nearly to the tip, and a white costal spot close to the tip; there is a sinus, or projection of the white into the dark brown portion, just before the middle, and from thence to the tip the line between the two colors is irregular, with another sinus behind the middle ;_ there is a small black spot in the white at the first sinus, and six others along the dorso- apical margin at the base of the ciliae, and another in the costal white spot, or more properly, perhaps, there are three in the costal white spot, two of them being confluent with the dark brown color around it; _ciliae white, except at the tip. A/. ev. iS inch. Season, April and May. In nine specimens I detect no variation. A. mirusella. N. sp. Palpi pale yellowish ochreous ; the second joint has two brown spots on its outer surface, that nearest to the base being largest ;_ the third joint has the base and tip dark brown. Head pale yellowish or nearly white ; antennae pale fuscous ; thorax pale yellowish ochreous, with four brown spots, two of which are about the middle and one on each side near the tip. Primaries white, faintly tinged with ochreous yellow, and with a rather wide golden brown basal streak, which begins near the costa and diverges thence to the end of the cell, and from thence narrows and becomes more diffuse towards the apex, which it does not quite attain. The costal whitish portion is more streaked and suffused with ochreous than the dorsal portion, which has a small brown spot before the middle ; there is likewise a row of small brown spots around the apex, at the base of the ciliae. Al. ex. t¢ inch. Season, April and May. I have not examined the neuration, and the ornamentation is unusual in the genus ; but the other characters are those of Avnesychia. 234 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. HARPALYCE, ge7. 10V. In the neuration, and more decidedly in the form of the secondaries, this genus makes a very near approach to the Zortricidz. ‘The hind wings are as wide as in any genus of that family. The primaries, however, rather resemble those of the genus HYagwo, and the palpi also ally it to the Gelechide. Wings nearly horizontal (in the dead insect). In the primaries the costa is regularly arched, and the wing is widest about the middle ; the costa attains the margin behind the middle ; the cell is rather narrow ; the subcostal gives off four branches to the margin before the end of the cell, the first and longest of which arises before the middle, and the last of which arises close to the end of the cell, and reaches the costal margin close to the apex ; the apical branch reaches the apex or the margin close to and beneath it; the discal vein gives off two branches ; the median gives off, close to the end of the cell, a single branch, which becomes furcate, and the apical branch runs to the margin, parallel to the discal branches ; the fold is thickened at the end, and the submedian vein is long and furcate at the base. The secondaries are at least one-half wider than the primaries, their width being equal to about two-thirds of the length ; the costa is strongly arched near the base, and very faintly simuate before the apex, which is rounded, and the dorsal margin very faintly sinuate beneath it ; the costal vein is sinuate from the margin and almost coincident with the subcostal towards the base, and attains the margin near the apex ;_ the cell is wide ; the subcostal is furcate behind the cell, with the superior branch delivered to the apex; the discal vein is curved or angulated, the angle pointing towards the base, and wear the median it is again angulated, the angle pointing backwards, and a branch proceeds from it to the margin; the median sends a branch from behind the middle to the margin, and from the origin of the branch bends up to its union with the discal, at which it becomes furcate. Submedian and internal veins distinct. In one of the species (canusella) the costa is not so much arched, and the posterior margin not at all sinuate beneath the apex, and the discal vein is curved (not angulated) and unites with the median without forming a second angle, what I have described as the discal branch vein, being continuous with the median and arising from a common origin with the furcate branch. —————— THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 23> Tongue rather short; maxillary palpi minute; labial palpi simple, slender, slightly overarching the vertex, the third joint about half as long as the second, and pointed ; antennae simple, more than half as long as the primaries, with the basal joint short and a little enlarged; scales of the posterior portion of the vertex a little roughened, but not forming a tuft ; eyes globose, of moderate size ; ocelli, none. H1. tortricella. WL. sp. Yellowish or straw color; head and hind wings paler, nearly white ; there is a minute, pale brownish spot at the end of the disc. Aj. ex. % inch. Season, May. f. albella. N. sp. White ; a minute, indistinct, ochreous spot at the end of the disc, on the forewings, and a very few widely scattered dark brown scales. There is a brownish, ochreous streak on the outer surface of the second joint of the palpi. Al, ex. ti inch. Season, June, July and August. FH. canusella. NN. sp. Pale grayish, almost white, with obscure patches of very pale fuscous on the primaries ; a small brown spot within the dorsal margin, before the middle ; another a little behind it on the fold, and another at the end of the disc. At the beginning of the ciliae is an obscure, narrow, curved, pale fascia, which is very concave towards the base of the wing. AZ ex. #5 inch. GELECHIA. G. thoracealbella. NN. sp. Second joint of the palpi brush-like, the brush spreading and faintly divided; third joint slender, more than half as long as the second. Palpi whitish, the second joint ochreous brown at the base, and the scales of the brush tipped with ochreous yellow ; face, head, and a wide streak from the head to the apex of the thorax, white. Antennae, sides of thorax over the wings, and the primaries brown, the primaries very faintly streaked with whitish towards the apex. A/. ex. 3s inch. G. minimaculella. NN. sp. Second joint of palpi brush-like; third more than half as long as the second. 936 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Head and palpi ochreous yellow ;_ palpi with the base of the second joint, a spot on its outer surface, near the tip, and a ring around the third joint, near the tip, dark brown ; antennae dark brown ; thorax brownish ochreous above, except the sides just above the wings, which are dark brown like the primaries, and, like them, faintly tinged in some lights with a bluish cast. Near the base of the primaries, extending from the costa to the fold, is a narrow, irregular, interrupted, somewhat oblique ochreous yellow line or series of small spots; there are three or four minute ochreous yellow spots on the disc, and a spot of the same hue about the beginning of the dorsal ciliae, and an opposite costal one. AZ. ex. ¥4 inch. G. ochreosuffusella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi brush-like; third joint about half as long as the second. Insect dark brown; second joint of the palpi above sprinkled with white or pale yellow scales ; third joint ochreous or yellowish, except at the base and a narrow annulus before the middle, which are dark brown ; head ochreous, densely dusted with dark brown, so as almost to obscure the ground color ; thorax, base of the wings, and a streak along the fold suffused with reddish ochreous ; primaries sparsely dusted with whitish and with a reddish ochreous streak at the base near the costa, as well as that on the fold, and with the costal and dorsal spots faintly indicated. The white dusting of the primaries is sometimes very distinct, and it forms an interrupted fascia or rather a line of small specks across the wing, just before the ciliae. 42. ex. 34 inch. G. depresso-strigela. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi brush-like ; third joint about half as long as the second. Brown, with a grayish ochreous tinge, the wings streaked with ochreous and the palpi sprinkled with whitish scales. Thorax, basal portion of the wings, and a streak along the fold suffused with reddish ochreous ; four very indistinct, oblique, dark brown lines extend along the disc, and the spaces between the veins in the apical part of the wing are each marked with a similar line, and all of these lines appear to be depressed or sunken below the general surface of the wing. A/. ex. 34 inch. Season, July, August and September. It resembles the preceding species, but the ——*——— . THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 237 brush is smaller, color of the head and palpi different, and the narrow longitudinal depressed brown lines separate it from that species. G. pallidagriseella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi brush-like; third joint about half as long as the second. Palpi and head whitish, almost hoary. Pale yellowish gray, a little suffused with ochreous on the thorax and primaries. There is a minute rust red spot about the middle of the disc ; extreme costa dark brown at the base ; antennae dark brown. AZ. ex. 34 inch. G. guadrimaculela. N. sp. Third joint of palpi longer than the second ; palpi not at all brush-like. Dark brown, in some lights tinged with ash gray ; a small dark brown spot on the fold within the basal fourth of the primaries ; another also on the fold about the middle ; another near it, about the middle of the disc, and another at the end of it. A/ ex. 5g inch. Season, May. The brown spots are very indistinct, differing but little from the general hue. G. Wacoella. WN. sp. Second joint of palpi with a small brush; third about as long as the second. Ochreous, sprinkled above with dark brown ; third joint dark brown : head and thorax dark brown, with a faint ochreous tinge. Primaries dark brown ; two ochreous spots on the costal margin near the base, another at the beginning of the ciliae, and two small spots of the same hue on the fold before the middle. AZ. ex. +s inch. G. crescentifasciella. N. sp. Palpi not brush-like; third joint about as long as second. Ash gray, microscopically dusted with brown ; there is a crescentic, very indistinct pale fascia at the beginning of the ciliae, very concave towards the base of the wing ; one or two minute dark spots on the disc, and one at its apex. A/ ex. Y%inch. Season, April and May. It resembles G. guadrimaculella, but is smaller and of a more ashen hue. Sometimes the fascia is absent. G. pullusella. N. sp. Palpi slender, simple; third joint more than haif as long as the second. 238 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Brown, microscopically sprinkled obscurely with whitish scales. _4Z ex. 7s inch. Season, August. G. plutella. WN. sp. Palpi simple, slender ; third joint more than half as long as the second, and pointed. Face and palpi white; vertex pale yellowish, with a dusky central spot ; antennae pale yellowish ; patagia and costal half of the primaries, almost to the tip, creamy white; thorax and dorsal half of primaries and the tip dark brown ; the whitish portion of the primaries is widest at the base, and the dark brown portion at the apex, and the whitish part sends two short, oblique projections into the brown one just before the middle Jf and the other just behind it. 42 ex. % inch. Season, August. The ornamentation of the wings bears considerable resemblance to that of Plutella cruciferarum, except that the colors are reversed. G. sella. LN. sp. Second joint of the palpi thickened bencath towards the tip, but not at all brush-like; third joint more than half as long as the second. Head yellowish white, sometimes with a wide longitudinal brownish streak on the vertex. Palpi very pale yellowish, with the second joint externally brown and internally streaked or sprinkled with brown, and the third joint, with the tip and a band around the middle, dark brown. Thorax and primaries pale ochreous gray; under the microscope pale ochreous yellow, somewhat dusted with fuscous. There is a velvety dark brown spot on the fold, not far from the base, behind which is usually. a dark brown dorsal streak, extending more than half across the wing, perpendicular to the margin, placed before the middle, but sometimes it is represented only by a triangular spot on the fold, and which does not touch the margin; and there is another small spot of the same hue at the end of the cell, and surrounded by a paler annulus; base of the costal margin and six or seven small spots along the costa dark brown, the last of which is just before the ciliae ; and there is a narrow ochreous basal Streak just within the costal margin; occasionally the spots along the costa are absent. A/. ex. % inch. Season, July and September. It is a handsome species. G. trimaculella, N. sp. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 239 Second joint of the palpi scarcely thickened ila aia third half as long as the second ; acuminate. Head, antennae and palpi pale vellowish white ; third joint of the palpi tinged with fuscous. Thorax and primaries very pale ochreous yellow (under the lens sparsely and minutely dusted with pale reddish ochreous scales); two small, nearly circular, blackish spots before the middle, one beneath the fold, the second on the disc, a little behind the first one ; and a larger one of the same hue at the end of the disc, anda row of minute, dark brown spots around the base of the ciliae. Al. ex. % inch. Season, April and May. G. clegantella. N. sp. Second joint of palpi scarcely thickened beneath ; third more than half as long as second. Palpi white ; second joint yellowish towards the tip, the third with three brown annulations, one at the base, one before the middle, and one before the tip, sometimes connected by a line along the under surface ; head and thorax sordid white or yellowish, slightly iridescent ; base of the primaries white, iridescent, narrow, but wider on the dorsal than on the costal margin ; this is followed by an oblique, ochreous or yellowish orange band, which crosses the wing and is margined with brown before and behind, and followed, by an oblique white band, which also crosses the wing, and is rather widely margined behind by an iridescent, brown line, terminating at a smooth tuft of raised scales on the dorsal margin, the tuft or rather smooth elevation being metallic and highly iridescent, as also are the brown margins of the ochreous bands; the dark brown, posterior margin of the second brown fascia is produced backwards along the disc and passes backwards along the disc, inclining towards, but not reaching the base of the dorsal ciliae, and containing three smooth, metallic elevations, like the one on the dorsal margin, the wing between it and the costa being white, and between it and the dorsal margin the wing is white and pale ochreous. The oblique streak terminates just before the dorsal ciliae at a curved fascia, which is very convex towards the base, is reddish ochreous on the dorsal margin, and brown on the costal margin. — This curved fascia is followed by an oblique one, which is nearest to the tip on the costal margin, and the costal portion of it is wide and white, and the dorsal portion brown, and in some lights is brilliant metallic ; the brown portion is narrow where it meets the white costal portion, and passes 240 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. around behind it to the costal margin, and thence curves as a narrow line backwards around the apex at the base of the ciliae, returning to its origin on the dorsal margin, thus enclosing an oblong, egg-yellow or golden patch, parallel with the base of the dorsal ciliae. In some lights this fascia is dull brown, not at all metallic, and the yellowish ochreous parts of the wing become almost brick red ; and, in truth, all the colors of the wing, except the dark velvety brown streak which passes obliquely the disc, are so variable that it is very difficult to give an adequate or intelligible description of the insect. The ciliae are fuscous. Al. ex. 34 inch. Season, May, August and September. I have also received it from Miss Murtfeldt, from St. Louis. This species belongs to the same group with G. roseo-suffusella, &c., and is the prettiest Ge/echia that I have seen. G. rufusella. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi somewhat thickened beneath before the apex (nearly as in the European G. populella); third joint a Little longer than the second. } . Palpi white ; second joint externally dark brown at the base. Head, thorax and base of the primaries yellowish white, with a faint reddish tinge, which gradually deepens and becomes more distinct as it passes backwards over the wings, and about the basal one-fourth becomes bright brick red, and continuing to deepen, becomes tinged with fuscous at the apex. Antennae brown, annulate with pale yellow. AZ ex. % inch. Sometimes the primaries are sparsely dusted with brown. Season, September. G. costa-rufoella. WN. sp. Second joint of the palpi clavate, not brush-like, brown, tipped with yellowish ; third joint pale yellowish. Antennae brown; head, thorax, base of the primaries, and costal’ margin to beyond the middle, rufous ; the remainder of the primaries brown, with four small yellow spots, two of which are on the fold, and two on the disc, and a fifth small one at the beginning cf the costal ciliae ; ciliae brown, pale at their base. AZ ex. a little over 14 inch. Season, September. G. subruberella. NN. sp. Labial palpi, with the second joint of the palpi, a little thickened before the tip, as in rufusella. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGISY. 241 Pale ochreous, faintly tinged with rufous, streaked and blotched with brick red along the base of the dorsal ciliae ; a minute rufous spot on the fold, and a circular brown one at the end of the disc, with a small one before it. AZ ex. % inch. Season, October. Very near to rufusella, perhaps a variety. The palpi are precisely as in that species as to form and colors, but the general hue is much paler. G. maculimarginela. N. sp. Second joint of the palpi a little brushlike, yellowish, dusted with dark brown; third joint dark brown, with extreme tip and a few scattered scales white ; about as long as the second. Antennae dark brown ; head pale ochreous yellow and brown ; thorax and primaries dark gray brown, spotted with darker colors; one of the spots is on the costa near the base, and there is a small yellowish spot before it and another behind it, and beyond that is another of the dark spots ; there is a dark spot on the fold, with a small yellowish one before it; a small dark spot about the centre of the disc, without any yellow spot before it, and about the end of the disc is another dark spot, with a small yellow one beforeit. There is a pale yellowish streak at the beginning of the costal ciliae, and an opposite dorsal one. 4/. ex. % inch. Season, July. G. argenti-albella. WN. sp. Second joint of the palpi scarcely thickened beneath; the third more than half the length of second. Silvery white; each joint of the palpi has a dark brown annulus before the tip; there are a few blackish scales over the base of the antennae, which are annulate with brown; a small dark brown spot on the extreme costa at the base, followed by three others within the margin, and there-is also a small one within the dorsal margin near the base ; there is a transverse brown spot or line on the fold, and another at the end of the disc, a brownish fascia at the beginning of the ciliae, and a brownish golden streak around the apex at the base of the ciliae. AZ ex. ys inch. Season, June. A rather pretty and distinctly marked species, like G. variiella, but I think it is quite distinct from it. G. bidiscomaculela. N. sp. Pale ochreous, becoming a little deeper towards the apex of the primaries; there is a small brown spot about the middle of the disc, 242 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. another at its end, and a brown streak along the base of the costal ciliae. Al, ex. ¥g inch. Season, July. I have but a single specimen, and in it the palpi are missing. Allied to swdruberella ; perhaps a variety of it. G. subalbusella. LN. sp. Second joint of the palpi not thickened. Creamy white, sparsely dusted with ochreous yellow and brown.” AZ. ex. 3g inch. Season, July. G. parvipulvella. LN. sp. Palpi simple. Pale yellowish white, lightly dusted with fuscous, the dusting more dense towards the apex of the primaries. Al. ex. 3g inch. Season, May and August. Possibly a variety of G. subalbusella. G. lavernella. LV. sp. Second joint of the palpi a little thickened beneath towards the apex; third joint rather thick. Palpi ochreous, with the basal half of the second joint and a band. before its tip, dark brown; an annulus before the middle of the third joint, and another wide one before its tip, dark brown. Thorax and primaries gray; base of the costal margin dark brown, and from it a narrow, oblique, dark brown streak crosses the wing to the dorsal margin, in its course crossing almost at night angles an indistinct brown line which proceeds from a brown spot on the costal margin, and passes obliquely forwards nearly to the base of the wing ; and at the intersection of the lines the brown color spreads around them, forming another spot ; these lines are irregular, and in some parts indistinct ; behind these lines the wing is densely dusted with fuscous to the tip, and a brown fascia is well indicated at the beginning of the ciliae. A/. ev. % inch. There is something in the clumsy looking palpi and general appearance which reminds one of a Laverna. G. cilialineclla. WN. sp. - Only microscopically distinguishable from G. solaniella. _Ochreous, tinged slightly with grayish; there is an indistinct brownish spot on the fold, and another a little behind it on the disc, and another in the apical part of the wing. Costal ciliae whitish, avd a narrow, indistinct, white THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 243 line at their base, and one also at the base of the dorsal cilia, and three dark brown hinder marginal lines in the apical cilia. Al. ex. V4 inch. G. minimella. WN. sp. Palpi simple. . Insect dark brown, indistinctly sprinkled with white. A/. ex. 34 inch. The neuration is nearly that of C/eodora. ANARSIA. A. suffusella. WN. sp. Ochreous yellow, somewhat suffused with fuscous. Outer surface of the second joint of the palpi dark brown, tipped with ochreous; third joint pale yellowish. The third joint of the palpi is more slender than in A. pruniella Clem., and the fascia is narrower. Al. ex. 34 inch. Season April. A. trimaculella. WN. sp. Outer surface of the second joint of the palpi dark brown, except at the apex of the tuft, where it is whitish; third joint yellowish. Head pale ochreous; head and thorax pale ochreous, densely dusted with fuscous. Primaries ochreous, suffused and dusted with brown; a small dark brown spot on the fold before the middle; one a little larger at the middle of the disc, and one at its end, and some scattered dark brown scales along the base of the dorsal ciliae, near the apex. A/. ex. scarcely ¥% inch. NEDA, géw. 10U. This genus is between Avarsia and Cleodora. It is an Anarsia in all but the hind wings, which are those of Cleodora, both in form and neuration. Head smooth, convex; ocelli, none; antennae minutely denticulate ; tongue moderate, scaled; labial palpi moderate, second joint with a projecting tuft at the apex; third joint smooth, ascending in the 2 (all my specimens are 2.) Primaries lanceolate, ciliae moderate ; the costal vein attains the margin before the middle ; the cell is narrow and pointed; the first branch of the subcostal is given off before the middle, and there are two other branches towards the end of the cell ; the apical branch is DA4 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. furcate on the costa before the tip, and has almost a common origin with ‘the adical branch of the median at the end of the cell; the median has three branches behind the middle, and the submedian is furcate at the base. The secondaries are pointed, scarcely as wide as the primaries, with the dorsal margin deeply excavated beneath the tip; the costal margin is excavated from the basal third to the tip ; the costal vein attains the margin about the middle ;_ the subcostal is straight to the end of the cell, and thence bends a little upwards to the apex ; the cell is very wide; the discal vein oblique, with two branches to the dorsal margin, the upper branch arising close to the subcostal, and the second continued faintly through the cell to the base ; the median is trifurcate behind the middle, the first branch remote from the others ; the submedian distinct ; internal obsolete. LV. plutella. Third joint of palpi and upper surface of the second one creamy white, the second otherwise dark gray brown; head, thorax and the dorsal margin of the primaries to a point beyond the beginning of the ciliae, creamy white, the primaries otherwise dark gray brown, except that the extreme costa is creamy white and the costal margin is obscurely streaked with the same hue. Ciliae of primaries creamy white, except atthe apex. A/. ev. %; inch. Season, September. The ornamentation reminds one of a Plufella. CLEODORA. (No species of this genus has heretofore been described from the U. S. or Canada.) C. pallidastrigella. N. sp. Palpi pale yellowish ; a spot on top of the third joint, and the brush on the second joint reddish ochreous. Thorax and primaries pale orange ; paler, nearly white, along the dorsal margin, and on the extreme costa beyond the middle; a narrow, indistinct, whitish line along the fold, ending at a small brown spot; there is an oblique, narrow, whitish streak along the base of the costal ciliae, continuous with the white of the extreme costa, and there is a short one along the base of the dorsal ciliae ; a minute brownish spot surrounded by a pale ring at the end of the disc, and an oblique brownish streak in the ciliae at the apex. The brown spots are all indistinct. Al ex. 34 inch. EE ——————— or THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 24 The neuration of the primaries differs from that of C. cytisella, as figured by Mr. Stainton (Zns. Brit., v. 3), by having a branch from the apical vein to the costal margin, just before the vein becomes furcate,and that of the secondaries differs from it by having a single branch from the discal vein, and the subcostal furcate beyond the cell, or rather the superior branch of the discal is united with the subcostal at the cell. Nevertheless, I have no doubt that this species and the following are properly placed in this genus. G. pallidella. NV. Sp. To the naked eye this species appears very pale gray, almost white ; under the lens it appears pale ochreous gray, with minute and indistinct pale fuscous specks ; there is a fuscous streak along the upper surface of the second joint of the palpi, and the antennae are annulate with fuscous. Al. ex. 34 inch. Season, August. Mr. Stainton, in a foot note on page 111 Of his edition of the Clemens papers, doubts whether Avorthosia Clem. ought to be separated from Cleodora. But the two genera differ decidedly in neuration, and the palpi of Anorthosia, as figured by Dr. Clemens, are very different from those of Cleodora, as figured by Mr. Stainton (Jus. Brit., v. 3). On the other hand, the palpi of Axorthosia resemble more closely those of my genus, Sagaritis. In both the tuft rises above the palpal joint, instead of spreading around it, as in Cleodora, and in those genera the tuft is com- posed of long scales, whilst in Cleodora it is clothed with stiff, bristle-like scales. In Axorthosia the tuft is figured largest at the base of the joint, whilst in Sagaritis it is largest towards the apex. The terminal joint in Dr. Clemens’ figure is represented shorter relatively to the third than it is in either Sagaritis or Cleodora. 1n both these genera the cell is closed in both wings, while in Avorthosia it is open. There are also other differ- ences both in the form and neuration of the wings. Sagarifis is quite distinct from Cleodora in the more elongate and slender body and legs, and more graceful appearance, as well as in the form and neuration of the wings. NOTHRIS. NV. griseella. N. sp. Tuft large, but not projecting beyond the end of the joint, its anterior * and inferior margins forming almost a right angle with each other; the 246 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. terminal joint of the palpi is nearly as long as the second, recurved = tongue rather scantily and roughly scaled at the base, the scales laterally projecting. Having but a single specimen, I have not examined the: neuration, but the palpi are nearly those of 1. vecharcella, as figured in Ins. Brit., v. 3, than to any other genus known to me. Pale gray ; basal half of the second joint of the palpi dark brown on the outer surface ; tip of third joint dark brown; basal joint and annu- lations of the stalk of the antennae brown. There is a rather short dark brown line on each side of the thorax above the wings. Primaries with the extreme costa at the base, and the inner angie, dark brown, and the base towards the dorsal margin suffused with faint reddish yellow; the disc from the base nearly to the middle is suffused with brown, and there: are faint brownish streaks between the veins in the apical part of the ‘wing. AZ ex. 34 inch. HOLOCERA. H. Clemensella. N. Sp. fl. chalcofrontella Clem. is so variable a species that it is possible this may be a variety of it; but it is not one of the described varieties. Whitish, dusted lightly with dark purplish brown, the dusting dense on the second joint of the palpi. There is a purplish brown patch at the base of the costa, a small one about the middle of the costa, a small one opposite to it on the fold, a small one on the disc opposite the space between the other two, one at the end of the disc, and a row of small dots around the apex at the base of the ciliae. A/. ex. % inch. Season August. POLYHYMNO, gé/. 710V. The two insects for which I erect this genus are possibly not con— generic. P. Zuteostrigellais a slender, elongate insect, whilst P. sexstrige/la is rather robust ; there is but a single specimen of the latter species, and the head of that is wanting, though it is otherwise perfect. The form and neuration of the secondaries is very nearly the same in both, and so is the form of the primaries, except that those of sexstrige//a are a little wider. The generic diagnosis is that of /uteostrigedla. The points in which sexstrigela differ from it are noticed under that species. The form of duteostrigella and the markings of ‘the wings in both species are suggestive THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. QAT of affinities with Gracilaria, especially the short streaks at the apex of the primaries, reminding one of the “hook” in some species of that genus. The palpi are rather suggestive of relation to Cosmopteryx or Stathmopoda, but the form. and neuration of the wings place it beyond doubt in the Gelechid@, though the caudate primaries are peculiar. No maxillary palpi; labial palpi recurved, very long and slender, with the third joint longer than the second, and pointed ; tongue long, scaled -at the base ; forehead convex ; face broad; scales of the head and face appressed; basal joint of the antennae small, scarcely distinguishable: from the stalk, which is long and slender. Primaries lanceolate, narrow, caudate, the costal and dorsal margins both being excised before the tip, behind the cell, the dorsal margin deeply so, and the extreme tip isa little hooked backwards. The costal vein is short, cell narrow; the subcostal gives off two branches, both behind the middle, the ‘first remote from the second, which is at the end of the cell; and the apical branch is furcate behind the cell, both branches going to the costal margin. The discal vein gives off a single branch, which goes to the dorsal margin, and the median is four-branched, all four at or near to the end of the cell ; the submedian is furcate at the base. The secondaries are deeply emarginate beneath the apex, which is a little hooked backwards ; the subcostal gives off a long branch from before the middle. and is furcate, with one branch to the costal and the other to the dorsal margin before the tip ; the cell is unclosed, and the independ- ent discal branch arises af the median, which is three-branched, the first one being before the middle and remote from the others. They are about as wide as the primaries. The neuration of the secondaries allies this genus to Z7ypanisma Clem.,. Taygete, Evippe, &c., Cham. P. luteostrigella. N. sp. Silvery white ; ciliae pale stramineous; upper surface of the thorax,. with four narrow, equidistant, longitudinal, golden yellow lines. Primaries with three similar golden yellow lines extending through the entire length of the wings; one of these is placed just within the dorsal margin, and is continuous with one of the central thoracic lines, but the line is very indistinct, becoming more distinct towards the apex ; another of the lines. on the wing is continuous with one of the lateral thoracic lines, is very SAG.” THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST distinct, becomes furcate on the disc, one branch going to the extreme apex and the other towards the dorsal margin at the beginning of the ciliae, where it becomes confluent with the first mentioned line, but immediately separates from it again, the two lines continuing on parallel to each other around the base of the dorsal ciliae to the apex. The third line begins on the costa at the base, and runs just within the costal margin nearly to the apex, where it becomes confluent with the second or apical branch of the second or median streak. In the apical part of the wing are three golden costal streaks, which become confluent with the second and third longitudinal lines, and point obliquely backwards, the first being rather remote from the other two ;_ behind these three streaks is a fourth one, perpendicular to the margin; behind this is a fifth, pointing obliquely forwards, and behind this again two short curved ones, pointing forwards, one at the apex and the other close to and before it. There are two’ distinct, though small black spots in the dorsal ciliae. AZ. ex. 34 inch. Season, August. Polyhymho? sexstrigella. N. sp. As already stated, the head is missing in the single specimen which I possess of this species, and the primaries are wider, decidedly so in pro- portion to their length, being a little wider than the secondaries, and the costal margin before the tip is not so decidedly scalloped ; the tip is not hooked backwards; the apical branch of the subcostal is not furcate ; there are three branches before it, instead of two, as in /ueostrigella, but the last one has almost a common origin with the apical, and the median is only three-branched, instead of four. The secondaries are the same, except that in this species the long branch of the subcostal (the first branch) is absent. The insect is more robust than /wtcostrigella. Iridescent fuscous, in some lights silvery. About the middle of the primaries is an oblique, wide, silvery white costal streak, of irregular out- line, reaching the fold, pointing obliquely backwards, divided in part by a narrow yellowish line, which passes back along the middle of the wing to the second costal streak, the wing above and below it being dark fuscous, somewhat iridescent ; the second costal streak is white and placed behind the middle ; opposite .to it is a white spot, just within the dorsal margin ; the second streak is dark margined behind, and the dark margin is pro- duced backwards as a line along the centre of the apical part of the wing, but does not quite reach the apex, and nearly opposite its end are two THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 249 small, straight, silvery white costal streaks, both dark margined behind and close to each other; behind these two streaks are two others, also close together, the last one at the apex and both dark margined behind. The apical part of the wing (behind the second costal streak) is golden yellow, sprinkled towards the dorsal margin with brown. Ciliae_ silvery fuscous, with a wide, dark brown hinder marginal line. _A/. ex. 36 inch. Season, July. In the form and neuration of the wings, and in the disposition of the costal streaks it approaches luteostrigella ; whether it does in the palpi and antennae remains to be seen. Since the above remarks were written, I have received from Mr. Belfrage more perfect specimens, and find the palpi and antennae as in luteostrigella. It may be necessary to amend the specific description a little hereafter. (To be Continued.) ON A NEW SPECIES ‘OF CERAMICA. BY H. K. MORRISON, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. Ceramica rubefacta (nov. sp.) Expanse, 41 m. m.; length”of body, 20 m.m. Eyes hairy ; collar and thorax reddish brown; the thorax of my only specimen was injured in capture, so that the presence, or if present, the size of the tufts could not be ascertained. But apparently it was tufted, as there are traces of a meta-thoracic elevation. Abdomen yellowish, with a strong basal tuft; the labial and anal tufts tinged with carneous ; beneath red ; anterior wings deep uniform red ; lines obsolete; nervules distinctly black ; a white dot.on the costa at the base ; the interior line is only represented by a white dot on the costa and on the subcostal, median and submedian nervures. The orbicular is blackish, small, oblique and with a grayish centre, situated close to the reniform, and at more than the usual distance from the base; reniform vague and blackish, with a gray -—-*. 250 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. -centre ; the exterior line consists of faint white dots on the nervules, and its course is marked by the slightest possible change of color between the median and subterminal spaces ; the ante-apical white dots are very distinct ; the subterminal line wanting, except at the costa, where several linear white shades show its place. Posterior wings yellowish white, with a broad fuscous terminal border; beneath the anterior wings are gray, with traces of an exterior line; the apical, costal aud terminal regions deeply suffused with carneous. Posterior wings whitish, with the fringe yellow; the costal and apical portions of the wings carneous. Had. Malden, Mass.; from my collection. Found under bark, June 24, 1873. In a reccnt paper, Mr. Grote refers Ceramica to Taeniocampa, being then only acquainted with Ceramica picta Harr. The discovery of this species, which agrees perfectly in structural characters with //cfa, confirms my previous opinion that the genus should be recognized. The characters which separate it from Zaeniocampa are not very striking, but they can be readily appreciated, and the habits and markings of the two species are very different from any of the Zaeniocampas. Rubefacta approaches to the description of vxdemialis Guen., but differs in the presence of the orbicular and in other particulars. In a recent number of the ENnromotocist Mr. Grote described a species under the title of Perigrapha normani. In working on allied genera, we have identified this form, but we are unable to see the propriety of the generic reference. The following are the characters of Lederer’s genus Perigrapha : Eyes hairy; tibiae unarmed; antennae pectinated in both sexes ; collar cut out and produced in front into a sharp corner: thorax with an angular projection on each side, and bearing behind the collar a lofty, sharp-edged, longitudinal crest ; abdomen with a closely cut tuft on the first segment. In the species under consideration the antennae in both sexes are simple; the collar is not produced into a sharp corner; the thorax is rounded, without angular projections on fhe sides. Behind the collar there is simply a small, flat, furrowed tuft, instead of a lofty crest ; the abdomen is untufted. Such being the generic characters of xormani, we remove it from Perigrapha and refer it to a separate section of Zueniocampa, as it agrees with the typical species of that genus, except in the possession of a slight prothoracic tuft. The known species will now stand as follows bo wr a THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. Taeniocampa Guen. Section t.—Thorax untufted. Alia Guen, ; Oviduca Guen. Pacificata Harvey. Section 2.—Thorax with a weak, flat, furrowed tuft behind the collar. Normani Grote. ON THE SPECIES REFERRED TO ORTHODES BY GUENEE. BY H. K. MORRISON, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. In Mr. Grote’s recent “‘ List of the Noctuidz” four of the five species described by Guencée are marked unidentified. With a very large material (nearly 100 specimens of the different species, for many of which we are indebted to Mr. F. C. Bowditch, who has found them common in the vicinity of Boston) before us, we have attempted to straighten out the species and to characterize the two genera to which we refer them. Mr. Guenée, in instituting this genus, comprised under it many discordant forms, and in his preliminary remarks he forsees the necessity of a future generic separation of the species. We restrict Orthodes to the group of which zzfrma is the type, and also the most widely known member. ORTHODES Guen., Noct., vol. 1, p. 371 (1852.) Imagines of medium size. The eyes hairy; antenne simple in both “sexes ; the palpi stout, erect, thickly but evenly clothed ; the terminal joint short, but distinctly separated from the other two ; the collar rounded, -distinctly lobed, and well separated from the thorax; in zzfirma there is an open space between the two lobes. The thorax untufted, its villosity smooth and pressed down ; the abdomen untufted, in the female -slightly exceeding the posterior wings ; in the male long hairy tufts which have their origin at the base of the genitalia, enclose and extend far beyond the parts ; the anterior wings rapidly increasing in width from the base outward, triangular, the apex and internal angle rounded. The -spots and lines are very clear and evident. Beneath, the males have on ‘the median space an irregular, slightly raised patch of closely compressed hair. J5Q, THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. SPECIES: Infirma, Guen., Noct., 1, p. 375 (1852). In this species the squamation is smooth ;_ the lobes of the collar are separated below ; the thorax is concolorous ; the anterior wings are dull purple gray ; the lines and spots are all present, with the exception of the claviform spot, and accompanied by distinct, even, yellow lines ; the half- line parallel with the interior line ; the median lines are trapezoidal ; the median shade is blackish, diffused,and curved, passing between the spots ; the reniform and orbicular are large, contiguous, and surrounded by pale annuli; a double row of spots on the nervules follow the exterior line ; the subterminal line is distinct, even and slightly curved ; the subterminal space dark, particularly near the costa; a pale scolloped line at the base of the wings. Beneath yellowish, with a common line; on the anterior wings the characteristic patch of hair is more elongated and narrower than in the allied species ; on the posterior wings discal dots. Expanse, 32-35 m.m. /fab., the Eastern and Middle States. Ihave also received specimens from St. Louis (Prof. C. V. Riley.) This species is very constant, except that the ordinary spots differ in their closeness to each other. It is extremely common in the Middle States in July; to the northward it becomes less abundant. Cynica Guen., Noct., 1, p. 375 (1852). Nimia Guen., id., p. 76; candens Guen, id. gf ....The collar rounded, well separated from the thorax; there is no open space between its two lobes. It varies greatly in color from light ochreous through all the shades of reddish and purple brown. ‘The thorax concolorous with the anterior wings; the latter are rounded, pro- portionately shorter than in ivfirma ; they vary from gray, with scarcely any red admixture, to deep reddish brown. The median lines are always present, simple, black and irregular,accompanied by paler shade lines ; their position in reference to eachother varies in different specimens,; in some they are tra- pezoidal, in others they are almost sub-parallel, and they vary to infinity between these two limits. The median shade is black, diffused and arcuate, always touching the base of the reniform,and approaching more or less near to the exterior line. The ordinary spots are always distinct, concolorous, with white annuli; they vary in their distance from each other. The orbicular is usually oblique, and but little smaller than the reniform ; in THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 953 one specimen, however, it is round and very small. The subterminal line is generally whitish, distinct, and preceded by a dark shade line; this latter is sometimes absent. The posterior wings are uniform, fuscous, slightly lighter at the base, with a faint discal dot ;_ the fringe tinged with ochreous or carneous, or with a shade between them. Beneath the anterior wings are gray, the apex sometimes carneous. The characteristic patch of hair covers the upper part of the basal and median spaces. The posterior wings are yellowish, with a discal dot and thick median line ; the latter is rarely obsolete. The fringes of both wings vary; they are usually carneous, but sometimes ochreous or even pale gray. The anal ‘tufts are usually yellowish. Expanse, 30 to 33 m. m. 2. Inthe female the collar is purple, tipped with ochreous ; the thorax and anterior wings are never gray, or with any trace of ochreous, neither are they reddish brown, as in the males ; they are usually of a dark intense purple brown. The median lines vary 2s in the males, but they are always less distinct ; the ordinary spots are usuaily present, as in the males, but in one specimen they are barely traceable. The subterminal light line is less distinct, and frequently entirely obsolete. The posterior wings are as in the males ; beneath also varying as in the other sex. Lxpanse, 29 to 32 m.m. //ab. Maine, Mass., N. Y., Ohio ; St. Louis, Mo. (Prof. C. V. Riley). Appearing in the latter part of June and first of July. We have no hesitation in referring ima as a synonym of this species, as specimens from New York exactly correspond with Guenée’s description. Candens, however, may be distinct ; but we are disposed to consider it merely a variety, from the description; at least until it is discovered and proved to be a good species. PSEUDORTHODES (vou. gen. ) Closely allied to Orthodes, but we think sufficiently distinct from it. The anterior wings are narrower than in Orthodes, and lack the distinctive sexual patch of closely compressed hair of the males. The markings are confused, and the ordinary spots are obsolete. The males have not the long anal tufts found in Orthodes. * The third palpal joint is longer and better defined. Vecors Guen., Noct. 1, p. 376 (1852.) Var. griseocincta Harvey, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci, 1874. 254 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. In this species the thorax is concolorous with the anterior wings ;_ the abdomen is smooth and flattened ; the wings are usually reddish brown or gray, lustrous ; the median lines are blackish and confused, often accom- panied by pale, faint shade lines; the interior line is slightly oblique and sometimes geminate; the median shade is broad, black, arcuate, and. diffused, touching the reniform, which is reduced to a red or white spot. The orbicular and claviform are absent. The exterior line is always simple and denticulate ; the subterminal line is faint, light, preceded very frequently by a dark shade, in which are sometimes formed, opposite to the cell, black cuneiform dots. The fringe is concolorous. Posterior wings dark grayish fuscous, sometime almost black. The discal dot is always present. Beneath the anterior wings are dark gray, with the terminal space usually light; the posterior wings lighter, with a distinct discal dot. A common median line extends over both wings. Expanse 25 to 32 m.m. Aad. Atlantic States. Nearly forty specimens were examined from different localities. O. cynica can be justly called a variable species, but this one is infinite in its variations of size as well as color. We can not.consider. gréseocincta other than a specimen in which the reddish tint is entirely absent, and the gray shades accompanying the lines are unusually prominent. The forms of this species slide so gradually into each other that it is impossible to draw distinct lines of demarcation. ‘There are, however, two principal varieties ; in one the reniform is clear, white and conspicuous, and the ground color is reddish ; in the other the reniform is reddish, or indicated only by a few pale scales, and the ground color is gray with but slight reddish admixture. Specimens of this latter variety (which is the only one described by Guenée) sometimes occur in which the ground color is. red, but it is more frequently the other way. In one specimen expanding only 25 m. m., the reniform is white ; the ordinary lines are diffused and black, coloring the whole wing, and entirely cbscuring the usual reddish shade. In another, which approaches griseocincta, the expanse is 31 m.m. ; the reniform is simply a few collected whitish scales. The lines are nearly obsolete, and the interior line is preceded by a faint pale shade band. The gronnd color is a dull lustrous. slightly brownish gray. THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 255 Obituary. The sad intelligence of the death of that distinguished Entomologist, Francis Walker, of London, England, conveyed in a brief notice in our last, will, we know, have brought grief to the hearts of all those who have been favored with the correspondence of that genial-hearted man. His continued and disinterested kindness towards all those with whom he had to do has endeared him to many. Although we never had the pleasure - of a personal acquaintance with the deceased, yet to ourselves personally, as well as to our Society, he has always been among the truest and kindest friends we have had, ever ready to do us any service in his power. His death leaves a void in onr circle which it will be hard to fill. The following brief sketch of his career and his unceasing labors, written by one who knew him well, will be read with interest : It has become my painful duty to record that Francis Walker, the most voluminous and most industrious writer on Entomology this country has ever produced, expired at his residence, Elm Hall, Wanstead, on the 5th of October, 1874, sincerely lamented by all who enjoyed the pleasure and advantage of his friendship. He was the seventh son, and the tenth and youngest child, of Mr. John Walker, a gentleman of independent fortune, residing at Arno’s Grove, Southgate, where the subject cf this memoir was born on the 31st of July, 1809. Mr. Walker—the father—had a decided taste for science, especially Natural History; he was a fellow of the Royal and Horticultural Societies, and vice-president of the Linnean, so that his son’s almost boyish propensity for studies, in which he after- wards became so eminent, seems to have been inherited rather than acquired. Mr. Walker’s decided talent for observing noteworthy facts in Ento- mology was first exhibited at home, when, as a mere child, his attention was attracted by the butterflies, which, in the fruit season, came to feed on the ripe plums and apricots in his father’s gardens ; Vanessa C-Album is especially mentioned ; and Limenitis Sibylla, another species no longer found in the vicinity of London, was then common at Southgate. In 1816 Mr. Walker's parents were staying with their family at Geneva, then the centre of a literary coferie, in which they met, among other celebrities, Lord Byron, Madame de Stael, and the naturalists De Saussure and Vernet. They spent more than a year at Geneva and Vevey, and in 1818 proceeded to Lucerne, from which place Francis, then a boy nine Lo Or er) THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. years of age, made the ascent of Mont Pilatus, in company with his elder brother Henry; their object, in addition to the ever delightful one of mountain-climbing, being the collecting of butterflies. |The family after- wards visited Neuwied, and returned to Arno’s Grove in 1820. In 1830 the two brothers, Henry and Francis, again visited the Continent, and now it was purely an Entomological tour, the late Mr. Curtis, the well-known author of ‘ British Entomology,’ being their com- panion. ‘This party collected most assiduously in the island of Jersey, and afterwards at Fontainebleau, Montpellier, Lyons, Nantes, Vaucluse, &c., the French Satyridee, of which they formed very fine collections, being their principal object. Mr. Walker's career as an author commenced in 1832. Hecontributed to the first number of the ‘Entomological Magazine,’ the introductory chapter of his ‘ Monographia Chalciditum,’ a work on the minute parasitic Hymenoptera—a tribe of insects which he ever afterwards studied with the most assiduous attention, and one on which he immediately became the leading authority. He was then only twenty-three years of age; but his writings exhibited a depth of research and maturity of judgment which have rarely been excelled, and which abundantly evince the time and talent he had already devoted to these insects. It is worthy of notice that he now descended from the largest and most showy to the smallest and least conspicuous of insects, doubtless feeling that whereas among the magnificent butterflies there was little opportunity for the discovery of novelties, among the Chalcidites everything was new—everything required that minute, patient, and laborious investigation in which he seemed so especially to delight. | Only two authors, Dalman and Spinola, had pre- ceded him in devoting their attention to the structure of these atoms of creation ; and even these two had described comparatively a very small number of species. vy In 1834 Mr. Walker, somewhat reluctantly, consented to undertake the editorial management of the ‘ Entomological Magazine,’ and resigned this office the following year, yet continued a constant contributor to its pages. The same year he visited Lapland, in company with two of our most distinguished botanists ; and in this extreme north of Europe, and especially at Alten and Hammerfest, he assiduously collected insects, more particularly the northern Diptera, the Satyridz among Lepidoptera, and the Chalcididze amongst Hymenoptera. During this journey we have the first and only notice of his prowess as a sportsman: he shot wild grouse THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 257 .and ptarmigan ; and on one solitary occasion was accessory to the death of a reindeer, but as other rifles besides his own were simultaneously discharged, it is difficult to say whose was the effective bullet. I am glad to be able to record that Mr. Walker declined to give the poor creature the coup de gréce, and, for this especial purpose, resigned to another his couteau de chasse. . In May, 1840, he married Mary Elizabeth, the eldest daughter of Mr. Ford, of Ellell Hall, near Lancaster, and spent the summer on the Con- tinent, again collecting in Switzerland with his customary assiduity. In 1848 he explored the Isle of Thanet, the following year the Isle of Wight, and succeeding years, 1850 and 1851, he visited Geneva and Interlachen ; and during the former year commenced his great work on Diptera. This formed part of a projected series of works on British insects, to be called ‘Insecta Britannica,’ a project in which the late Mr. Spence took a deep interest. During the year 1851 was published the first volume of the ‘ Diptera.’ ‘This work is printed in 8vo., and contained 314 pages ; the second volume appeared in 1853, and contained 298 pages; and the third volume in 1856, and contained 352 pages. ‘Thus the entire work comprised nearly 1000 pages of closely-printed descriptions. Another tour on the Continent occupied a considerable portion of 1857, Mr. Walker visiting Calais, Rouen, Paris, Strasbourg, Baden-Baden, Heidelberg, Wiesbaden, Frankfort, Mayence, Cologne, Brussels, Aix-la- ‘Chapelle, and Antwerp. During the journey he collected in the Black Forest ; and this is the only scene of his scientific labours, during the tour. of which I have any intelligence. The summer of 1860 was devoted to a thorough exploration of the ‘Channel Islands. Dr. Bowerbank was his companion during a portion of the time, and, as a consequence, the sponges of these islands were a main object of research—the Gouliot caves in Sark, so celebrated for their marine productions—were a great attraction to both naturalists. In 1861 Mr. Walker’s excursions were chiefly confined to North Devon; he visited Linton. Clovelly, Ilfracombe, Bideford, and Barn- staple : and now his attention seems to have been again chiefly occupied with Lepidoptera, at the scarcity of which he was greatly disappointed, having expected, from the extensive woods, to have found moths particu- larly abundant. 9258 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. In 1863 he toured the English lakes; and, in the spring of 1865, North Wales and Ireland; and in the autumn he again visited Paris, Geneva, Lucerne, Interlachen, and Altdorf, ascending the -Righi, Mont Pilatus and the Mirren, and proceeding to Kandersteg, the Oeschinen See, and the Gemmi Pass. In 1867 we find him again in France and Switzerland, ascending the Col de Voza, and examining the Jardin of the Mer de Glace ; thence over the Téte Noir to Martigny, Sion, and the Great St. Bernard ; returning by St. Maurice and the Villeneuve to Geneva. In 1869 he made the tour of the Isle of Man, and returned by Holy- head ; in 1870 he paid another visit to Llanberis, as well as to all the more beautiful scenery in North Wales, crossing over to Ireland, and touring that island from south to north ; and in 1871 he examined Entomologically the Scilly Islands, and the districts of the Lizard and the Land’s End. In 1872 he turned his attention to Italy, visiting Rome, Piza, Lucca, Florence, Naples, Sorrento, Capri, Milan, and Venice, as well as the Lakes. of Como and Maggiore. And, finally, in the present year, he had again proceeded as far as Aberystwith, on his way to Ireland, when his intention was frustrated by illness, which terminated fatally on the 5th of October. He died in’ the most perfect peace of body and of mind. For many years Mr. Walker was a member of the Linnean and Entomological Societies of London, but resigned his membership in both some time before the close of his life. It might be excusable in a man of such incessant bodily activity—so locomotive by inclination, so devoted to the study of Nature in all her aspects, so dilligent a collector of the objects of his favourite study—had he allowed his pen to rest while his hands were engaged in forming and arranging his collections. | But this was not the case with Mr. Walker, as his Catalogues of the National Collection abundantly testify. Of the Lepidoptera Heterocera, alone, Mr. Walker catalogued and described upwards of twenty-three thousand species ; in addition to which he pre- pared similar catalogues, although perhaps not to the same.extent, of the Diptera, Orthoptera, Homoptera, Neuroptera, and part of the Hymen- optera: such an amount of labour, as is testified by these catalogues, has seldom, if ever, been accomplished by one individual. But this statement by no means represents the whole of his literary labours. He contributed ——E—— THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 259 shorter or longer papers to the Transactions of learned societies, and to the periodicals of the day, especially to the ‘ Zoologist’ and ‘ Entomolo- gist ;’ by the indexes of the latter I find he sent. thirteen communications to the first volume, three to the second, one to the fourth, thirteen to the fifth, and forty-three to the sixth; during the present year his writings appear in every number. I intended to catalogue these and his other labours, to give some idea of the number of pages, number of species and dates of each; but I can scarcely now venture to look forward to the accomplishment of this labour of love. A word remains to be spoken of the man apart from the scientific and accomplished naturalist. ‘Throughout my long life I have never met with anyone who possessed more correct, more diversified, or more general information, or who imparted that information to others with greater readiness and kindness ; I have néver met with any one more unassuming, more utterly unselfish, more uniformly kind and considerate to all with whom he came in contact. _It is no ordinary happiness to have enjoyed the friendship of such a man for nearly half a century.— Zdward Newman in The Entomologist. CORRESPONDENCE. ON CIRR@DIA PAMPINA Guen. DEAR SIR,— In the list of the North American Noctuidz published in the Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, we find the familiar name of Cirredia Guen. replaced by Afethmia Hubn. We are unable to see the necessity of this change. A/ethmia was founded by Hubner in the Verzeichniss (1816) on x erampelina Hb. ambusta W. V. subusta Hb. Guenée, in his “ Zssai sur les Noctuélites,’ printed in the Annals of the, French Entomological Society for 1839, p. 489, takes out .. erampelina, which is congeneric with our fampina as well as the European ambusta, placing it in the genus Civradia. In 1852, the same author in the “ Species Général,” vol. 6, p. 12, defines Athetmia (which he spells as in. the index, not the text of. the “ Verzeichniss”), referring subusta as the typical 260 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. species, and adding another, zzusfa, to the genus, both of these species being native in South America. This being the synonymy of the two genera,we would retain Cirredia for our well known form. H. K. Morrison, Cambridge, Mass. BOOK NOTICES. Manuscript Notes from my Journal, or Illustrations of Insects, Native and Foreign Diptera, by Townend Glover, Washington, D. C. We sincerely thank the author of this valuable work for his great kindness in placing us on the list of the favored few among whom the first small edition of forty-five copies of the above work has been dis- tributed. This work is unique in several respects. It is a fac simile of the author’s own note book on this family of insects, written by the author himself on prepared pzper, then transferred to stone and printed on a lithographic press. ‘The costliness of the paper required for this purpose and the fact that it can only be used on one side, adds much to the expense of issuing this work, which expense has been borne entirely by the author. Such generosity and disinterestedness in the interests of our favorite science is deserving of the highest commendation. The work is published in quarto form, and opens with three pages of introductory matter, followed by thirteen plates, containing no less than 480 excellent illustrations of Dipterous insects in their various stages, or of parts of these insects, accompanied by suitable explanatory lists of names, &c. The labor on these plates alone, all of which is the work of this pains-taking and laborious Entomologist, is something enormous, and this, to our knowledge, is but a fraction of the work he has accom- plished in this department during the past few years. ‘The next 59 pages are occupied by an alphabetical list of the families and genera of Diptera, with synonyms, habitat, food, &c. Then a list of predaceous or parasitic Diptera ; vegetable and animal substances inhabited, injured or destroyed by Diptera, &c., &c, A valuable practical portion of the work is the enumeration and description of various remedies which have been suggested to giard against the injuries caused by these insects. Each division of the work throughout is arranged alphabetically and in the most convenient manner, so as to enable the student to refer readily to any portion he may desire. Notices of other books received will appear in our next. INDEX TO VOLUME VI. A Acronycta lepusculina, 154 = perdita, 154 Adisophanes miscelius, 16 Aecaea n. g., 73 “<< ostryaeella, n. sp., 74 Agrotis, On Two Species of, 131 alternata, 214 A Thirsty Spider, 119 Attacus luna, 86, 146 B Bethune, Rev, C. J, $., Articles by, 159, 160, 181, 200 Behrens, James, Article by, 18 Hi attentus, i. sp., 131 Boarmia larvaria, On the Larva of, 32 oa amen n.sp., 13 | Book Notices, 260 “© Cochranii, 214 * | Books Received, 77 i collaris, 13 Brief Notice, 199 + conflua, 71 | British Association, Meeting of, 160 fennica, 19, 155 Bucculatrix pomifoliella, 231 Be fuscigerus, 155 | Bulletin Buff. Soc. Nat. Sei., 99 ES gilvipennis, 71 | Bunker, Robert, Article by, 25 a Hollemani, 156 | Butalis basilaris, 8 yy lyearum, 155 ea flavifrontella, $ “ perattentus, n. sp., 131 i “ fuscicomella, 8 Alypia Langtonii, 70 so matutella, 8 Amadria Clemensella, n. sp , 232 | Butterflies, Eurupean, Food Plants of, 21, 126 American Association, Meeting of, 160, 161, 185 Butterflies of North America, 98, 120 Amphipyra py ramidoides, 2 27 Anarsia suffusella, n. sp., 248 “ — trimaculella, if. sp., 243 ; C Anatrichis minuta, 135 Andrews, W, V., Articles by, 16, 145 | Caloptenus spretus, 185 Anesychia mirusella’ n. Sp., 233 Captures Interesting, 140 = multipunctella, n, sp., 233 ' Catocalas, Notes on, 25 Anisopteryx pometaria, 29 Catocala aspasia, 199 er vernata, 29 ss Whitneyi,n. sp., 125 Annual Address, President’s, 181 “< magdalinua, 199 “« Meeting Ent, Soc , 199 ** relicta, 100 ae ** London Branch, 38 ** —ultronia, Larva of, 147 “< Report, Riley’s 6th, 140 Caterpillars, On Preserving by Inflation, 107 Anthrax analis, 176 Caulfield, F. B., Articles by, 119, 132 “< bastardi, 176 Ceramica, New 'Species of, 249 ** fulvina, 177 ae rubefacta, i. sp., 249 “ fuscipennis, 176 Cerastis altcrnata, 15 “* terminipennis, 176 Ceratocampa regalis, 147 Antispila, 166, 197 | Chambers, V.T., Articles by, 8, 49, 72, 96, 128. ampelopsiella, n. sp., 197 149, 166, 197, 217, 229. es ampelopsifoliella, n. sp., 168 | Chilocorus bivumerus, 85 eA cornifoliella, 166, 198 Chionebas, 55 xe hydrangaeella, in, sp., 170 Chrysopeleia, n. g., 72 se isabella, 167, 198 ) as purpuriella, n. sp.. 73 ze viticor difoliella, n. sp., 168, 198 Chrysops carbonarius, 178 Aphis Excretion, use of, 5 | Cirroedia pampina, 259 Arctia arge, 98 | Cleodora, 244 — “borealis, 70 “« pallidastrigella, n. sp., 244 ** rubricosa, 158 « pallidella, n. sp., 245 “virgo, 158" | Clisiocampa syivatica, 158 Pearson, C H., Lotte from, 119 Pelidnota punctata, 141 Perigr apha, 250 See n, sp., 115 Perime de, i Jen se N SP.y 52 Pettit, J,, Article by, 45 Phalaenide of California, 78 Philampelus satellitia, 39, 158 Philonome, n. g.. 6 cg Clemensella, n. 8p. 97 Phragmatobia rubricosa, 71 Phylioxera vastatrix, 79, 185 Phyciodes marcia, 159 Phyllocnistis vitigene.la, 169 Pieris frigida, 56 *- oleracea. i ** rapae, 36, 37 57, 60, 184 Platarctia parthenos, 70 Platysamia co umbia, 119 Placodes cinereo a, 16 Platythiris, 171 Me oculatana, 171 Plu ella cruciferarum, 230, Plusia gamm +, 16 Poluhymno i. g.. 246 as luteostrigella, it. Sp. 247 ide sexstrigella, i, sp., 248 Polyommatus americanus, 140 Pseudorthodes, n g., 253 “s vecors, 253 Psyche, 99, 120 Pteromalus puparum, 37 Pyrameis atajanta, 38 232 Q Quarterly Journal of Science, 77 R Reed, E. B., Article by, 227 Riley, C. V., Article by, 207 Rogers, R. V., Article by, 81 264 INDEX TO VOLUME VI. S Theisoa, 2. g.y 75 _“* _bifasciella, n, sp. 76 Saperda moesta, Notes on Larya of, 61 ae cena eo a Sarcophaga sarraceniae, 208 ; : Tischeria-malifoliella, 150 Sarracenia variolaris, Insects Associated with, 207 | To Our Patrons, 60 > Saturnia io, 227) | Trichius bidens, 140 Saunders, W., Articles by, 1,2, 27, 32, 38, 46, 59, | 60, 61, 77, 98, 101,120, 138, 140, 141.147, | U 161, 199, 260 Scottish Naturalist. 159 Scudder, S. H.,; Articles by, 21 107, 126, 143 | Urania Druryi, 180 Sesia diffinis, 171 / - rhipeus, 180 : “ ruticaudis, 170 / - Signs to Denote Sex, 130 V Sinoe ambrosiaeella, 9 Sphinx eremitoides, 199 ee 5-maculata, 88, 147 Stratiomis ischiaca, 177 Stretch, R. H., Article by, 119 Vanessa antiopa, 146 ‘© G-album, 60 P rT Summers, S. V.. Articles by, 52, 135 VW Synonymical Note, 180 Syrphus Ribesii, 177 Walker, Francis, Articles by, 11, 111 = agnon, 177 i Syritta proxima, 177