Natural History Museum Library 000111769 VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. A SUMMARY OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS, FIRST PART. REPORT ON THK SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER DURING THE YEARS i 8 7 2-7 6 UNDER THE COMMAND OF Captain Sir GEORGE S. NARES, R.N., F.R.S., AND THE LATE Captain FRANK TOURLE THOMSON, R.N. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERINTENDENCE OF THE LATE Sir C. WYVILLE THOMSON, Knt., F.R.S., &c. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH DIRECTOR OF THE CIVILIAN SCIENTIFIC STAFF ON BOARD AND NOW OF JOHN M U R RAY ONE OF THE NATURALISTS OF THE EXPEDITION A Summary of the Scientific Results FIRST PART (WITH APPENDICES) IpubltsfteO bp #rtjer of Iper Jftajestp's ©obetnmnu PRINTED FOR HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE AND SOLD BY LONDON EYRE & SPOTTISWOODE, EAST HARDING STREET, FLEET ST., E.C EDINBURGH and GLASGOW JOHN MENZIES & CO. DUBLIN r— HODGES, FIGGIS, & CO., Ld. 1895 Price {First and Second Parts ) Eighty Shillings PRINTED BY NEILL AND COMPANY, EDINBURGH, FOR 1IER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE. * CONTENTS. PAGE I. — Editorial Notes, with List of the Memoirs making up the Challenger Report, ........ vii II. — A Summary of the Scientific Results obtained at the Sounding, Dredging, and Trawling Stations of II.M.S. Challenger. By John Murray, LL.D., Ph.D., F.R.S.E., one of the Naturalists of the Expedition, Director of the work connected with the publication of the Scientific Results of the Expedition, and Editor of the Challenger Report, ...... xxxiii III. — Report on the specimen of the Genus Spirula collected by H.M.S. Challenger. By the Rt. Hon. T. H. Huxley, F.R.S., and Professor Paul Pelseneer, .... Appendix [The Manuscript ivas received in January 1894.) IV. — Report on Oceanic Circulation based on the Observations made on board H.M.S. Challenger and other Observations. By Alexander Buchan, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.E., . . Appendix ( The Manuscript teas received in December 1894.) (summary op results chall. exp. — 1895.) b EDITORIAL NOTES. The Challenger Expedition was organised by the British Government during the years 1871 and 1872 at the suggestion of the Royal Society. The ship was fitted out under the direction of Admiral G. H, Richards, at that time Hydrographer of the Admiralty, and she sailed from Sheerness in December 1872. The special object of the Expedition was the scientific exploration of the physical, chemical, geological, and biological conditions of the great ocean basins. In addition to a full complement of specially selected Naval Officers, the Expedition comprised a scientific staff of six civilians, under the direction of Professor C. Wyville Thomson. After circumnavigating the globe, and carrying on deep-sea and other investigations in many regions of the ocean, the Challenger returned to England in May 1876, and the crew was paid off after the ship had been in commission for over three years and seven months. Numerous scientific observations were successfully recorded in all branches of oceanic research. Large zoological and other collections were sent home from various ports during the voyage, and were brought home in the ship. $oon after the return of the Expedition considerable correspondence took place . between the authorities at the Admiralty, the Treasury, the British Museum, and the Royal Society, with reference to the disposal of the collec- tions, the best way of discussing the observations and the method of publishing the scientific results of the Expedition. It was ultimately decided that the land and other incidental collections made by members of the Expedition during the voyage should be at once handed over to the British Museum for incorporation in the national collections. It was further determined that the records of the various observations and the marine collections should remain in the meantime in the hands of those who had taken part in the w yXU THE voyage of h.m.s. challenger. Expedition, anil that a temporary Government department, with a small annual -rant, should he created, the duty of which should be to direct the discussion of the physical and biological observations, the examination of the collections, and the publication of the scientific results, so far as these had .1 U-aring on the science ot Oceanography. It was arranged that the whole of the Official lie port on the Scientific Results of the Expedition should be published by Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, and that the typical collections should be ultimately deposited in ft le British Museum. Sir 0. Wyville rhou.son was appointed director of this temporary Government department, and I l>ocaine the first assistant. These arrangements took effect in the spring of 1877. Shortly after- wards Sir C. Wyville Thomson’s health unfortunately broke down; he continued in ill health until his death in March 1882, and delay was t|;, u by caused in the progress of the work. But the style ot the publications j,ad Uvi settled by him, a considerable part of the collections had been nt to Naturalists for examination and description, and a few Zoological Memoirs were published before 1882. Sir Wyville Thomson had not 1 able, however, to decide on any definite and complete scheme with r. Terence to the scope of the Report as a whole, nor was he able to under- take the preparation of any manuscript in connection with the Narrative *f the Voyage and the special Zoological Memoirs he had himself proposed to write. After 1 succeeded to tlie direction in January 1882, the work connected with these publications was carried on in consultation with a Committee ,,f the Royal Society. During the six succeeding years, rapid progress was ; j . with the investigations and memoirs dealing with the observations ..ad i ..Hi otions of the Expedition, forty-six volumes, containing the Narrative *.f t ( t r.' • and a large number of special memoirs having in this interval issued from the press. In tie war 1**1) Her Majesty’s Treasury declined to ask Parliament ; : ; . the annual grant for the continuation of the work relating to the in t t! le-nltv of the Expedition, the time estimated for the completion f tin p blieation having expired. However, after some correspondence, in wid'h I dir red to finish the Report at my own expense, the Govern- meiit rord t ' set apart the sum of sixteen hundred pounds for the EDITORIAL NOTES. IX completion of the official publications in the same style as that in which they had hitherto appeared. This sum has been the only payment from Government funds in connection with the Challenger Expedition during the past six years : — the price of each volume of the Report has been fixed so as to repay the expenditure of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offie for printing, provided that the whole edition of seven hundred and fifty copies be sold. The present volumes complete the “official publications on the Scientific Results of the Expedition. They contain a historical review of the progress of Oceanography, a summary account of the observations and result obtained at each of the Challenger observing stations at sea, lists illustrating the geographical and bathymetrical distribution of marine organisms, and an index of the genera and species described or recorded in the Report. Two important special memoirs which, owing to unavoidable delay in preparation, could not be published in the Zoological and Physical series are appended to these summary volumes. The first is a Memoir by the Right Hon. T. H. Huxley and Dr. Paul Pelseneer on the rare Cephalopod Spirilla. one specimen of which was procured by the Expedition. The second is a Memoir by Dr. Alexander Buchan on Oceanic Circulation, which is accom- panied by an extremely interesting series of maps showing the specific gravity and temperature of the ocean at different depths. The several special Memoirs on Zoological, Physical, and Chemical subjects which make up the larger part of the Challenger Report were published separately, and in volumes, as soon as completed, wfith very little attempt at any systematic arrangement. It will be seen on reference to the follow - ing list that the whole Report is now bound up in a series of Fifty large Royal Quarto Volumes containing about twenty-nine thousand five hundred pages, illustrated by oyer three thousand lithographic plates, copper plates, charts, maps, and diagrams, together with a very large number of wood- cuts. It was originally the intention, on the completion of the Report, to print new7 title-pages, with instructions for rebinding the several series of Memoirs in systematic order. This intention has been abandoned after con- sultation with many scientific authorities. Fourteen years have elapsed since the first volumes were published, and in scientific literature there are so many X THB voyage of h.m.s. challenger. references to the Memoirs in their present bindings, that any advantages to be ned from rebinding would not make up for the inconveniences and o allusion therein introduced. In order to facilitate reference to the sevend Memoirs, a systematic list of the contents ot the whole Report is a p] tended to these notes, as well as a list of the separate volumes and their contents. i'li,' completed Report contains Memoirs from seventy-six authors who, for the most part, are natives of Great Britain and her colonies, but scientific men of nearly all civilized countries are represented among the contributors. In addition to the authors whose names appear on the title- ,.s , : - li. Special Memoirs, many other investigators have. taken part in the various physical and chemical researches, in the examination of the collections, the preparation of tin* illustrations, in the editorial work, and in various »i.i-*r wavs have contributed to the elaboration of the Scientific Results of the Expedition. ! phi be ‘Tinning to end the history of the Challenger Expedition is simply a recc’d of continuous and diligent work. There were few opportunities t',»r any brilliant exploits during the voyage. The daily and hourly magnetic and raeteorologic observations, the handling of the ship during the tedious- ,1, ., _v, ;l investigations, the work connected with boat excursions and expedi- tions 1 nd. in addition to the usual operations ot the marine surveyor and ] 1 • Mi,,r, all demanded from the naval officers and seamen an amount of constant care and attention, far surpassing what is required dining an 01 dinary commission >t one of Her Majesty s ships. The labom connected with pre- sen ing, cataloguing, and packing the biological and other collections on board •Tip is enormous, so also was that involved in their subsequent examination the return of the Expedition, and their distribution to specialists in many arts of the world. All this was, however, accomplished with success, and the t\|,i, i! collections have now been deposited without any mishap in the British Museum. Tin majority of the authors of the Special Memoirs have spent \c rs in the examination of tin* collections and in the preparation of their manuscript and illustrations for the press, without other remunera-, tlou than cither a copy of the Challenger Publications or a small tionorarimu to cover the outlay necessitated by their researches. The payments to the Civilian Staff have been very moderate, and in my own EDITORIAL NOTES. xi case at least have not covered actual expenditure in connection with the work of the Expedition. The great difficulty in carrying through an undertaking of this nature arises from considerations of time. The researches of the specialist tend ever to become more elaborate : in no case were the authors of the larger Special Reports able to terminate their work within the original estimates as to time and bulk. The limitations in reference to expenditure imposed bn me by the Government often rendered it imperative to curtai] the in- vestigations, and to cut out matter from the Memoirs when in other circumstances I would gladly have fallen in with the views of contributors and collaborators. The care exercised in all the arrangements connected with these publica- tions is indicated by the fact that every Special Memoir which was commenced has been completed and published. The plan and proportion of the several parts of the Report have been largely determined by the complicated and changing conditions under which the work has been carried on, and this in turn accounts for an apparent want of unity in the contents of the volumes as issued from the press during the past fourteen years. Great care has been taken to insure accuracy in statement and to make the Report, in the first instance, a faithful record of the observations, investigations and scientific results immediately bearing on the work of the Expedition. The researches and publications connected with the Expedition might have been extended in several directions with advantage to science had the allotted time and funds permitted ; as it is, a few collections have not been thoroughly examined, and some observations have not been fully discussed. In June, 1872, I was appointed one of the naturalists of the Challenger when the Expedition was being fitted out. During the past twenty-three years my time has been wholly taken up with the work of the Expedition and in the study of those subjects which the Expedition was organized to investigate. The direction of the whole of the work connected with the publication of the Scientific Results passed unexpected^ into my hands, and I have done my best in the circumstances to place on permanent record a trustworthy account of the labours of this famous Expedition. It has been my earnest endeavour to complete the publications in a manner worthy of the naval position and scientific reputation of this great Empire. Notwithstanding the trouble- XII the VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. personal sacrifices and regrets necessarily connected with the work, it has -on a pleasure and an honour to liave taken part in explorations and researches which mark the greatest advance in the knowledge of our planet the celebrated geographical discoveries of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Foi the assistance and advice 1 have received during the progress of ;his LMv.it undertaking I now desire to convey my thanks to my colleagues on , K\ i .edition ; to the contributors of the Special Memoirs; to my colleagues the « ditorial staff; to Sir W. H. Flower, Director, and the officers of the British Mus. um (Natural History), especially Dr. A. Gunther and the Zoologists and Botanists of the Biological Departments; to W. T. riiiselton Dyer, Esq., C.M.G., Director of Kew Gardens and Herbarium; Admiral W. .1, L. Wharton, Hydrographer, and the officers of the 1 ! ,dr«. graphic Department of the Admiralty; to T. Digby Pigott, Esq., ( ’ uir lKr. and the heads of the different departments of Her Majesty's Stationery Office ; as well as to many scientific men interested in the science of Oc eanography. John Murray. Chai.lk.nobh Office, 45 Frederick Street, Edinburgh, January 28, 1895. ( xiii ) THE CHALLENGER REPORT. SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE CONTENTS OF THE OFFICIAL REPORT ON THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. The Report is hound in Fifty Large Royal Quarto Volumes. I. NARRATIVE, Narrative of the Cruise of H.M.S. Challenger, with a general account of the Scientific Results of the Expedition. By Staff-Commander T. H. Tizard, R.N. ; Professor H. N. Moseley, F.R.S, ; Mr. J. Y. Buchanan, M.A. ; and Mr. John Murray, Ph.I)., Members of the Expedition. Partly illustrated by Hr. J. J. Wild, Artist to the Expedi- tion. (Vol. 1, in two parts), . . (1885) II. PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, and METEOROLOGY. Magnetical Results. By Commander Maclear, R.N. ; Lieu- tenant Bromley, R.N. ; Staff-Commander Tizard, R.N. ; and Staff- Commander E. W. Creak, R.N. ; with Instruc- tions and Memorandum prepared under the Super- intendence of the Hydrographer of the Admiralty. {Farr., Vol. 2), . . . (1882) Magnetical Results. By Staff -Commander E. W. Creak, R.N., F.R.S. (Phys. Chem., Part VI.), (Yol. 2, 1 889) Pressure Errors of the Challenger Thermometers. By Professor P. G. Tait, M.A., Sec. R.S.E. ( Narr ., Vol. 2, Appendix A.), . . . . (1882) On some of the Physical Properties of Fresh- Water and of Sea-Water. By Professor P. G. Tait. {Phys. Chem., Part IV.), . . . (Voi. 2, 1889) Deep-Sea Temperature Observations. By the Officers of the Expedition. {Phys. Chem., Part III.), (Vol. 1, 1884) Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 1172 118 305 22 6 46 1 80 2 19 258 c W.J ■ - xiv Tin: VOYAGE OF n.M.S CHALLENGER. H. PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, and METEOROLOGY— continued. Composition of Ocean Water. By Professor William Dittmar, F. RSS. L. & E. {Phys. Chem., Part I.), (Vol. 1, 1884) Specific Gravity of Samples of Ocean Water. By J. Y. Buchanan. Esq., M.A., B’.R.S.E., Chemist and Physicist of the Expedition. (Phys. Chem., Part II.), (Vol. 1, 1884) Meteor* »looical Observations. By Staff-Commander Tizard, R.N., assisted by other Officers of the Expedition. (AW., Vol. 2), ' . . . . (1882) \tm< (Spheric Circulation, based on the Observations made on l ard II.M.S. Challenger and other Meteoro- logical Observations. By Alexander Buchan, M.A., LL.D. (Phys. Chem., Part V.), . (Vol. 2, 1889) Oceanic Circulation, based on the Observations made on board H.M.S. Challenger and other Observations. By Alexander Buchan, M.A., LL.D. {Phys. Chem., Part MIL), . (Appendix to Summary, 1895) III. GEOLOGY and PETROLOGY. Dkki Ska Deposits. By Dr. John Murray and Professor A. Renard, . . {Deep-Sect Deposits, 1891) \nalytical Examination of Manganese Nodules, with p. i-ial reference to the Presence or Absence of the Rarer Elements. By John Gibson, Ph.I)., F.It.S.E. (Deep-Sea Deposits , Appendix II.), . . (1891) Ci'1 mi< \l Analyses of Marine Deposits, Manganese Nodules, l'ii<»pliatic Concretions, Zeolitic Crystals, Volcanic I ipillae, Glauconite, Bones of Cetaceans, Teeth of Sharks, A* By Professors Brazier, Dittmar, Renard, Sipocz, Mr. Vnderon, and others. {Deep-Sea Deposits, Appen- d.xlll.) .... (1891) Petrology of St. Paul’s Rocks (Atlantic). By the Rev. Proft or A. Renard, F.G.S., F.R.M.S., &c. ( Narr ., Vol. 2. A pp> ndiz B.), . (1882) ■ Islands. By Professor A. Renard, LLD.. Ph.D., F.G.S., Hon. F.R.S.E. (Phys. ('hem., Part V1L), (Vol. 2, 1889) Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 258 3 50 12 445 ... 347 54 38 16 583 94 33 1 18G 7 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE OFFICIAL REPORT. XV IV. BOTANY. Present State of Knowledge of Various Insular Floras, being an introduction to the Botany of the Challenger Expedition. By William Botting Hemsley, A.L.S. (Introduction), . . . (Vol. 1, 1885.) Botany of the Bermudas and various other Islands of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans. — The Bermudas. By W. Botting Hemsley, A.L.S. (Parti.), . (Vol. 1, 1885) Botany of the Bermudas and various other Islands of the Atlanticand Southern Oceans. — St. Paul’s Rocks, Fernando - Noronha and contiguous Islets, Ascension, St. Helena, South Trinidad, the Tristan da Cunha Group, Prince Edward Group (Marion Island), the Crozets, Kerguelen Island, Macdonald Group (Heard Island), Amsterdam and St. Paul Islands. By W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. (Part II.), .... (Vol. 1, 1885) Botany of Juan Fernandez, South-eastern Moluccas, and the Admiralty Islands. By W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. (Part IIP), . . . . . (Vol. 1, 1885) Diatom ace a:. By Conte Abate Francesco Castracane degli Antelminelli. (Part IV.), . . (Vol. 2, 1886) V. ZOOLOGY. General Introduction to the Zoological Series of Reports. By Sir C. Wyville Thomson, F.R.S., (Vol. 1, 1880) Foraminifera. By Henry Bowman Brady, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., &c. (Part XXII.) One Vol. text and one Vol. plates, .... (Vol. 9, 1884) OrbitoLites, specimens of the Genus. By W. B. Carpenter, C.B., M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S. (Part XXL), (Vol. 7, 1883) Radiolaria. By Professor Ernst Haeckel, M.D., Ph.D. (Part XL.) Two Vols. text and one Vol. plates, (Vol. 1 8, 1887) Keratosa. By N. Polejaeff, M.A. (Part XXXI.), (Vol. 11, 1884) Deep-Sea Keratosa. By Professor Ernst Haeckel, M.D., Ph.D., Hon. F.R.S.E. (Part LXXXII.), (Vol. 32, 1889) Monaxonida. By Stuart 0. Ridley, M.A., F.L.S., and Arthur Dendy, B.Sc., F.L.S. (Part LIX.), (Vol. 20, 1887) Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 82 155 13 346 p 40 352 12 214 30 76 956 117 59 8 2155 141 102 10 104 I 8 398 52 XVI THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. V. ZOOLOGY — continued. Tktk utinf.llida. By Professor W. J. Sollas, M.A., D.Sc., LL.D. (Part LXIII.), . • (Vol. 25, 1888) Ukxaitinkllida. By Professor F E. Schulze. (Part LIN.) One Vol. text and one Vol. plates, . (Vol. 21, 1887) C al»' area. By N. Polejaeff, M.A., of the University of Odessa. (Part XXIV.), . . (Vol. 8, 1883) Alcyonaria. By Professor E. Perceval Wright, M.A., VI. D., S,,. M.R.I.A., and Professor Tli. Studer, M.l). (Part LXIV.), .... (Vol. 31, 1889) A i tyon \ria (Supplement). By Professor Th. Studer, M.l). LXXXI), • • • (Vol. 32, 1889) Pj , 1 1 1 i ida. By Professor Albert v. Kolliker, F.M.R.b., Hoi ! (Part II.), . • (Vol. 1, 1880) Vntipatiiaria. By George Brook, F.L.S., F.RS.E. (Part LX XX.), • (Vol. 32, 1889) Acti maria. Bv Professor Richard Hertwig. (Part XV.), (Vol. 6, 1882) AcTCNIABIA (Supplement). By Professor Richard Hertwig. (Part LXXIU.), • • • (Vol. 26, 1888) (v- i yin Hy droid, Alcyonarian and Madreporarian Corals. Bv Professor H. N. Moseley, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S., F.L.S. (Part VIL), • • • (Vol. 2, 1881) Rkke Corals By John J. Quclch, B.Sc. (Lond.) (Part XL V I.), (Vol. 16, 1886) Hydroida. First Part. — Plumularidse. By Professor G. J. Allman. M.D., LL.D., F.R.C.S.I., h.R.SS. L. and L., MRLA-, C.M.Z.S. (Part XX.), . (Vol. 7, 18 Uydroitja. Second Part. — Tubularinae, Corymorphinm, C Dekp-Sf.a M kdcsaj. (Part XII ), . lion. F.R S.E (Part LXXVII.), i»ea. First Part — Stalked Crinoids. Carpenter, D.Sc. (Part XXXIL), By P. (Vol. 11, 1884) Pages. Plates, Waps,&c. 673 45 624 104 89 9 439 49 41 6 45 11 246 15 154 14 64 4 252 32 219 12 79 20 202 40 i 295 32 l 441 50 520 62 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE OFFICIAL REPORT. xvii Pages. Plates, Maps, . , Netherlands, . . (Appendix to Part LII.) Amphipoda. By Rev. Thomas R. R. Stebbing, MA. ( Part [.XV If.) Two Vols. text and one^Vok^ plates, I so pod \ First Part. — Genus Scrolls. By Frank Evers Beddard, M .\ (( >xon.), F.RS.E., F.R.M.S., F.Z.S., MB.O.U. (Part XXXIII.), . • • (\ol. 11, 1884) Isopoda Second Part. By Frank Evers Beddard, M.A. (Oxon.) F.R 8.E F.Z.S., &c. (Part XL VIII.), (Vol. 17, 1886) Phyllocarida. By Professor G. 0. Bars. (Part LVI.), (Vol. 19, 1887) F.B.S. (Part LXXVIII.), • (Vol. 31, 1889) Grkks Turti.i (Chelonc, viridis, Schneid.). Development of tin Bv William Kitchen Parker, F.R.S. (Part V.), (Vol. 1, 1880) Birds. By P. L. Selater, F.R.S., F.L.S. ^y^^gg^ Containing Reports on the Birds collected in . i The Philippine Islands. By Arthur, Marquis of Tweed- dale, F.R.S., P.Z.S. n Th*‘ Admiralty Islands. By P. L. Selater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S. in Tongatabu, tbe Fiji Islands, Api (New Hebrides), and. Tahiti. By Dr. O. Finseh, C.M.Z.S. iv. Tern ate, Amboyna, Banda, the Ki Islands and the Arrou Islands. By T. Salvadori, C.M.Z.S. v. Cap'- York, Australia, and on the neighbouring islands (Kaine, Wednesday, and Booby Islands). By W. A. Forbes, F.Z.S. 337 485 181 481 86 57 62 170 37 50 11 73 32 6 13 30 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE OFFICIAL REPORT XXI V. ZOOLOGY (birds) — continued. vi. The Sandwich Islands. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S. vii. Antarctic America. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., and Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S. VIII. The Atlantic Islands and Kerguelen Island, and on the miscellaneous collections. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., F.R.S. ix. On the Steganopodes and Impennes collected during the Expedition. By P. L. Sclater, Ph.D., F.R.S., and Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S. x. On the Laridse collected during the Expedition. By Howard Saunders, F.R.S., F.L.S. xl. On the Procellariidae collected during the Expedition. By Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S., &c. List of the eggs collected during the Expedition. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., F.R.S. (Appendix I. to Part VIII.) Note on the Gizzard and other organs of Carpophaga latrans. By A. H. Garrod, M.A., F.R.S. (Appendix II. to Part VIII.) Petrels (Tubinares). Anatomy of the. By W. A. Forbes, B.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., M.B.O.U. (Part XL), (Vol. 4, 1882) Spheniscida:. Anatomy of the. By Professor Morrison Watson, M.D., F.R.S.E. (Part XVIII.), (Vol. 7, 1883) On some points in the Anatomy of the Thylacine ( Thylacinus cynocephalus ), Cuscus ( Phalangista macu- lata), and Phascogale ( Phascogale calura), with an account of the Comparative Anatomy of the Intrinsic Muscles and Nerves of the Mammalian Pes. By Professor D. J. Cunningham, M.D., F.R.S.E. (Part XVI.), .... (Vol. 5, 1882) Cetacea. Bones of. By Professor William Turner, M.B. (Lond.), F.R.SS. L. & E. (Part IV.), (Vol. 1, 1830) Seals. By Professor Sir William Turner, Knt., M.B., LL.D., F.R.SS. L. & E. (Part LXVIII.), (Vol. 26, 1888) Human Skeletons. First Part. — The Crania. By Professor William Turner, M.B., F.R.SS. L & E. (Part XXIX.), (Vol. 10, 1884) Human Skeletons. Second Part. By Professor Sir W illiam Turner, Knt., M.B., LL.D., F.R.SS. L. & E. (Part XL VI I.), .... (Vol. 16, 1886) Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 75 7 267 19 196 13 49 3 254 10 141 7 1 143 3 d XXII HIE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. VI. SUMMARY. Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. A Si m mary of the Scientific Results obtained at the 8 inding, Dredging, and Trawling Stations of H.M.S. Challenger. By John Murray, LL.D., Ph.D., F.R.S.E., or.t of the Naturalists of the Expedition, Director of the 'work connected with the publication of the Scientific K. suits of the Expedition, and Editor of the Challenger Report, (1895) 1665 76 i 1ST OP THE FIFTY VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT WITH THEIR CONTENTS AS BOUND AT TIME OF PUBLICATION. I. NARRATIVE (bound in three volumes). Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. Yoi. 1. Narrative of the Cruise of H.M.S. Challenger, with a Lr' neral account of the Scientific Results of the Expedi- tion. 4$yStaff-Commander T. II. Tizard, R.N.; Professor EL N. M' F.R.S.; Mr. J. Y. Buchanan, M. A.; and Mr. dohn Murray, Ph.D., Members of the Expedition ; partly illustrated by Dr. J. J. Wild, Artist to the Expedi- tion. (In two parts), .... (1885) 1172 118 Vol. 2, containing : — (1882) M n rn Ri lt By Commander Maelear, R.N.; Lieu- t< nant Bromley, R.N.; Stall-Commander Tizard, R.N. ; and Staff-Commander E. W. Creak, R.N.; with Instruc- tions and Memorandum prepared under the Superintend- ence of the Hydrographer of the Admiralty. M vn oro logical Observations. By Staff-Commander Tizard, K.N., as- is ted by other Officers of the Expedition. Bbe-hki: Errors of the Challenger Thermometers. By Profe.- or P. (». Tail, M.A., Sec. R.S.E. (Appendix A.) Petrology of St. Paul's Rocks (Atlantic). By the Rev. I ’ro*'- >or A. itenard, I .G.S., F.R.M.S., &c. (Appendix B.) 823 2 LIST OF THE FIFTY VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. XX 111 u 4 II. PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY (bound in two volumes). Vol. 1, containing : — (1885) Part I. — Composition of Ocean Water. By Professor William Dittmar, F.R.SS. L. and E. Part II. — Specific Gravity of Samples of Ocean Water. By J. Y. Buchanan, Esq., M.A., F.R.S.E., Chemist and Physicist of the Expedition. Part III. — Deep-Sea Temperature Observations. By the Officers of the Expedition. Yol. 2, containing: — (1889) Part IV. — On some of the Physical Properties of Fresh- Water and of Sea-Water. By Professor P. G. Tait, M.A., Sec. R.S.E. Part Y. — Atmospheric Circulation, based on the Observa- tions made on board H.M.S. Challenger and other Meteorological Observations. By Alexander Buchan, M.A., LL.D. Part VI. — Magnetical Results. By Staff-Commander E. W. Creak, R.N., F.R.S. Part VI I. — Petrology of Oceanic Islands. By Professor A. Renard, LL.D.. Ph.D., F.G.S., Hon. F.R.S.E. III. DEEP-SEA DEPOSITS (bound in one volume). Deep-Sea Deposits. By Dr. John Murray and Professor A. Renard, . . . . (1891) Analytical Examination of Manganese Nodules, with special reference to the presence or absence of the Rarer Elements. By John Gibson, Ph.D., F.R.S.E. (Appendix II.) Chemical Analyses of Marine Deposits, Manganese Nodules, Phosphatic Concretions, Zeolitic Crystals, Volcanic Lapil- la3, Glauconite, Bones of Cetaceans, Teeth of Sharks, &c. By Professors Brazier, Dittmar, Renard, Sipocz, Mr. Anderson, and others. (Appendix III.) IV. BOTANY (bound in two volumes). Vol. 1, containing : — (1885) Introduction. — Present State of Knowledge of A arious Insular Floras, being an introduction to the Botany of the Challenger Expedition. By William Botting Hemsley, A.L.S. Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 325 272 633 69 583 94 - 910 65 ! XXIV THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. IV. BOTANY (Vol. 1)— continued. [’art l— Botany 01 the Bermudas and various other Islands of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans. — The Bermudas. By W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. Bart II. — Botany of the Bermudas and various other Islands ,,[ th<‘ Atlantic and Southern Oceans. — St. Pauls Rocks, Fernando-Noronha and contiguous Islets, Ascension, St. Helena, South Trinidad, the Tristan da Cunha Group, Prince Edward Group (Marion Island), the Crozets, Kerguelen Island, Macdonald Group (Heard Island), Amsterdam and St. Paul Islands. By W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. Part III. — Botany of Juan Fernandez, South-eastern Molluceas, and the Admiralty Islands. By W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. Vol 2, containing : — (1886) Part IN'. — Diatom ace.e. By Conte Abate Francesco Castra- cane degli Antelminelli. O V. ZOOLOGY (bound in forty volumes). V ol. 1, containing : — (1880) General Introduction to the Zoological Series of Reports. By Sir C. Wyville Thomson, F.R.S. Part 1. — Brack iopotia. Bv Thomas Davidson, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., V.P.P.S. Part II. Pf.nnatulida. By Professor Albert v. Kblliker, F.M.R.S., Hon. F.R.S.E. Part III. — Ostracoda. By G. Stewardson Brady, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S. Part IV. — Cetacea. Bones of. By Professor William Turner, M.B. (Lond.), F.Il.SS. L. & E. Part V — Green Turtle ( Chrlone viridis, Sehneid.). Develop- ment of the. By NVilliam Kitchen Parker, F.R.S. Part V! — Shore Fishes. — By Dr. Albert Gunther, M.A., M.D., Ph.I)., F.R.S., V.P.Z.S., F.L.S. Vol. 2, containing : — (1881) Part VII. — Certain Hydroip, Alcyonarian, and Madre- iorarian Corals. P»y Professor H. N. Moseley, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S., F.L.S. Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 214 30 553 107 422 62 LIST OF THE FIFTY" VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. XXV f & / / V. ZOOLOGY (Vol. 2) — continued. Part VIII. — Birds. By P. L. Sclater, F.R.S., F.L.S. Containing Reports on the Birds collected in : — i. The Philippine Islands. Bv Arthur, Marquis of Tweeddale, F.R.S., P.Z.S. ii. The Admiralty Islands. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S. ill. Tongatabu, the Fiji Islands, Api (New Hebrides), and Tahiti. By Dr. 0. Finsch, C.M.Z.S. iv. Ternate, Amboyna, Banda, the Ki Islands and the Arrou Islands. By T. Salvadori, C.M.Z.S. v. Cape York, Australia, and on the neighbouring islands (Raine, Wednesday, and Booby Islands). By W. A. Forbes, F.Z.S. vi. The Sandwich Islands. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S. vii. Antarctic America. By P. L, Sclater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., and Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S. viii. The Atlantic Islands and Kerguelen Island, and on the miscellaneous collections. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., F.R.S. ix. On the Steganopodes and Impennes collected during the Expedition. By P. L. Sclater, Ph.D., F.R.S., and Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S. x. On the Laridse collected during the Expedition. By Howard Saunders, F.R.S., F.L.S. xi. On the Procellariidee collected during the Expedition. By Osbert Salvin, M.A., F.R.S., &c. List of the eggs collected during the Expedition. By P. L. Sclater, M.A., F.R.S. (Appendix I.) Note on the Gizzard and other organs of Carpophciga latrans. By A. H. Garrod, M.A., F.R.S. (Appendix II.) Vol. 3, containing : — (1881) Part IX. — Echinoidea. By Alexander Agassiz. Part X. — Pycnogonida. By P. P. C. Hoek, Assist. Zool. Lab., Leyden. Vol. 4, containing : — (1882) Part XI. — Petrels. Anatomy of the. By W. A. Forbes, B.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., M.B.O.U. Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 496 558 86 85 XXVI the voyage of h.m.s. challenger. ZOOLOGY (Vol. 4) — continued. part \n Deep-Sea Medusa:. By Professor Ernst Haeckel, M.D., Ph.D. Part XIII. — Holothurioidea. First Part. — The Elasipoda. Bv Hjalmar Th^el. Pages. ^ Plates, 4aps,&c. Vol. 5, containing : — (1882) Part XIV.— Ophiuroidea. By Theodore Lyman. Part XVI. — On some points in the Anatomy of the T h\ la- cine ( Thijlacinus <' >/ iioccphctlu s) , Cuscus ( Phulcincfistci and Phascogale (T hciscogcile calv/ra ) , with m account of the Comparative Anatomy of the Intrinsic Muscles and Nerves of the Mammalian Pes. By Professor D. «T. Cunningham, M.I)., F.R.S.E. 587 61 Vol. 6, containing : — (1882) Part XV. — Actiniaria. By Professor Richard Hertwig. Part XVII— Tunicata. First Part.— Ascidise Simplices. By Professor William A. Herdman, D.Sc., F.R.S.E. 486 51 Vol. 7, containing : — (1883) Part XVI 11. — SphenisciD/E. Anatomy of the. By Professor Morrison Watson, M.D., F.R.S.E. Part XIX.— Pelagic Hkmiptera. By F. Buchanan White, M.D., F.L.S. Part XX.— IIydroida. First Part.— Plumularidse. By Pro- fessor G. J. Allman M.D., LL.D., F.R.C.S.I., F.R.SS. I, k E.. M.R.I.A, C.M.Z.S. Pari XXI. — Orbitolites. Specimens of the Genus. By W. B. Carpenl r, C.B., M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., h.G.S. 493 50 Vfol. 8, containing : — (1884) part XXIII. — Copepoda. By G. Stewardson Brady, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S. Part XXIV. — Calcarra. By N. Pol^jaetr, M.A., of the University of Odessa. XXV. CiRRiPKDLA. Systematic Part. By P. P. C. Hock, Memb. Roy. Acad. Sci., Netherlands. 468 77 Vol. 9, containing: — (1884) Part XXII. — Foraminifera. By Henry Bowman Brady, F.R.S., F. L.S., F.G.S., &c. (One Vol. text and one Vol. plates. ) 956 117 LIST OF THE FIFTY VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. V ZOOLOGY — continued. Vol. 10, containing : — (1884) Part XXYI. — Nudibranchiata. By Dr. Rudolph Bergh. Part XXVII. — Myzostomida. By Professor Ludwig von Graff. Part XXVIII. — Cirripedia. Anatomical Part. By P. P. C. Hoek, Memb. Roy. Acad. Sci., Netherlands. Part XXIX. — Human Skeletons. First Part. — The Crania. By Professor William Turner, M.B., F.R.SS. L. & E. Part XXX. — Polyzoa. First Part. — Cheilostonmta. By George Busk, F.R.S., V.P.Z.S., &c. Vol. 11, containing : — (1884) Part XXXI. — Keratosa. By N. Polejaeff, M.A. Part XXXII. — Crinoidea. First Part. — Stalked Crinoids. By P. H. Carpenter, D.Sc. Part XXXIII. — Isopoda. First Part, — Genus 'Seroiis. By Frank Evers Beddard, M.A. (Oxon.), F.R.S.E., F.R.M.S., F.Z.S., M.B.O.U. Vol. 12, containing (1885) Part XXXIV. — Annelida Polyceleta. By Professor W. C. MTntosh, F.R..S. Vol. 13, containing : — (1885) Part XXXV. — Lamellibranchiata. By Edgar A. Smith, F.Z.S. Part XXXVI. — Gephyrea. By Professor Emil Selenka, Erlangen. Part XXXVII. — Schizopoda. By Professor G. 0. Sars, Vol. 14, containing : — (1886) Part XXXVIII. — Tunicata. Second Part. — Ascidiae Com- positse. By William A. Herdman, D.Sc., F.L.S., F.R.S.E. j Part XXXIX. — Holothurioidea. Second Part. By Hjalmar Tlieel. Vol. 15, containing : — (1886) Part XLI. — Marseniadje. By Dr. Rudolph Bergh. PartXLII. — Scaphopoda and Gasteropoda. By Rev. Robert Boog Watson, F.L.S. Cjecidze. By Leopold, Marquis de Folin. Appendix to Part XLI1. X o %) jrx Pages. 740 717 689 658 792 898 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. xxviii V ZOOLOGY (Vol. 15) — continued. Part XL1II. — Poi.yplacophora. By Professc Had don, M.A., M.R.l.A. Vol. 16, containing : — Part XLIV. — Cephalopoda. By William Evans Hoyle, M.A. (Oxon.), M.R.C.S., F.R.S.E. Part XLV. — Stomatopoda. By Professor W. K. Brooks. * Part X LVI. — Reef Corals. By John .T. Quelck, B.Sc. (Bond.). Part XLVII.— Hum an Skeletons. Second Part. By Professor Sir William Turner, lvnt., M.B., LL.D., F.R.SS. L. & E. Vol 17, containing : — (1886) Part XI ATI I. — Isopoda. Second Part. By Frank Evers Beddard, M.A. (Oxon. ), F.R.S.E., F.Z.S., &e. Part XLIX. — Brachyura. By Edward J. Miers, F.Z.S., F.L.S. Pan L. — Polyzoa. Second Part. — C}rclostomata, Ctcnosto- mata, ami Pedicellinea. By George Busk, F.R.S., V.P.L.S., &c. Vol. 18, containing : — (1887) Part XL — Radiolaria. By Professor Erust Haeckel, M.D., Ph.I). (Two Vols. text and one Vol. plates.) Vol. 19, containing : — (1887) Part LI V. — Nemertea. Bv Professor A. A. W. Hubrecht, LL.D., C.M.Z.S. Part LV. — Cumacea. By Professor G. O. Sars. Part LVI. — P hyllocarida. By Professor G. 0. Sars. Part LVIII. — P teropoda. First Part. — Gymnosomata. By Paul Pelsenecr, D.Sc. (Brussels). Vol. 20, containing: — (1887) Part LI X. — MONAXONIDA. By Stuart 0. Ridley, M.A., F.L.S., and Arthur Dendy, B.Sc., F.L.S. Part LX I. — M YZ08TOMIDA (Supplement). By Professor L. von Graff. Part LXIL — CephaLODIBOUS DODBOALOPHUS. By Professor William 0. M'Intosh, M B., LL.D., F.R.S. Ckpjialodiscts dodecaloi’Huk. By Sidney F. Harmer, B.A , B.Sc. Appendix to Part LXIL Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. Alfred C. (1886) 779 65 779 2155 379 477 65 141 33 63 Co LIST OF THE FIFTY VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. XXIX V <33 S k 7 r . ^ ; y ZOOLOGY — continued. Yol. 21, containing : — (1887) Part LIII. — Hexactinellida. By Professor F. E. Schulze. (One Vol. text and one Vol. plates.) Yol. 22, containing: — (1887) Part L VII— Deep-Sea Fishes. By Dr. Albert Gunther, M.A., M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S. Yol. 23, containing : — (1888) Part LXY.— Pteropoda. Second Part. — Thecosomat'a. By Paul Pelseneer, D.Sc. (Brussels). Part LX VI.- — Pteropoda. Third Part. — Anatomy. By Paul Pelseneer, D.Sc. (Brussels). Part LXX. — Hydroida, Second Part. — Tubularinse, Cory- morphinge, Campanularinse, Sertularinae, and Thala- mophora. By Professor G. J. Allman. Part LXXI. — Entozoa. By Dr. 0. von Linstow, Gottingen. Part LXXII. — Heteropoda. By Edgar A. Smith, F.Z.S. Vol. 24, containing : — (1888) Part LII. — Crustacea Macrura. By C. Spence Bate, F.R.S., F.L.S. (One Vol. text and one Yol. plates.) Description of Sylon challengeri, n.sp., a parasitic Cirriped. By Dr. P. P. C. Hoek, Memb. Roy. Acad. Sei., Netherlan#. (Appendix to Part LII.) Vol. 25, containing: — (1888) Part LXIII. — Tetractinellida. By Professor W. J. Sollas, M.A., D.Sc., LL.D. Yol. 26, containing : — (1888) Part LX. — Crinoidea. Second Part. — Comatulse. By P. Herbert Carpenter, D.Sc., F.R.S., F.L.S. Part LX VIII. — Seals. By Professor Sir William Turner, Knt., M.B., LL.D., F.R.SS. L. & E. Part LXXIII. — Actiniaria (Supplement). By Professor Richard Hertwig. Yol. 27, containing :— (1888) Part LXIX. — Anomura. By Professor J. R. Henderson. Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 624 105 481 73 | 514 49 1198 157 1 673 45 797 84 • 514 39 (SUMMART OF RESULTS CHALL. EXP. — 1895.) XXX THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Pages. Plates, Vlaps,&c. ZOOLOGY (Vol. 27) — continued. I':irt LXXIV. — Anatomy of the Deep-Sea Mollusca. By Professor Paul Pelseneer, D.Sc. Part LX XV. — Phoronis Buskii. By Professor W. C. M 'In tosh, F.R.S. Part LX XVI. — Tunicata. Third Part. — Pelagic Tunicates. By Professor William A. Plerdman, D.Sc., F.R.S.E., F.L.S. Vol. 28, containing : — (1888) Part LX XVI I. — Siphonophor.f;. By Professor Ernst Haeckel, M.D., Ph.D., Hon. F.R.S.E. 441 50 Vol 29, containing : — (1888 ) Part LXVII. — Amphipoda. By Rev. Thomas R. R. Stebbing, M.A. (Two Vols. text and one Vol. plates.) 1786 213 Vol. 30, containing : — (1889) Part LI. — Asteroidea. By W. Percy Sladen, F.L.S., F.G.S., (One Vol. text and one Vol. plates.) 1059 119 Vol. 31, containing : — (1889) Part LX1\ . - Al/JYON ARIA. By Professor E. Perceval Wright, M V M.D., Sec. M.R.I.A., and Professor Th. Studer, M.D. Part LXXVIII. — Pelagic Fishes. By Dr. Albert Gunther, M.A., M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S. Part I XXIX. — Polyzoa (Supplement). By A. W. Waters, F.L.S , F.G.S. 537 58 Vol. 32, containing : — (1889) Part LX XX. — Antipatharia. By George Brook, F.L.S., F.R.S.E. Part LX XXI. — Al< yonaria (Sunplement). By Professor Th. Studer, M.D. Par: I XXXII. — Deep-Sea Keratosa. By Professor Ernst Haeckel, M.D., Ph.D., Hon. F.R.S.E. 391 29 LIST OF THE FIFTY VOLUMES OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. XXXI VI. SUMMARY (bound in two volumes). Summary of tb.e Scientific Results obtained at the Sounding, Dredging, and Trawling Stations of H.M.S. Challenger. By John Murray, LL.D., Ph.D., one of the Naturalists of the Expedition, Director of tlie work connected with the publication of the Scientific Results of the Expedi- tion, and Editor of the Challenger Report. With Appendices, viz.: — (1895) Spirula. By Rt. Hon. T. H. Huxley, F.R.S., and Dr. Paul Pelseneer, ( Zool ., Part LXXXIII.) Oceanic Circulation, based on the Observations made on board H.M..S. Challenger and other Observations. By Alexander Buchan, M.A., LL.D., (Phys. Chem., Part VIII.) Pages. Plates, Maps,&c. 1665 76 32 6 38 16 ! Anemometer, Thermometer, Current Drag, Sextant, and Carbonic Acid Apparatus. ' A SUMMARY OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OBTAINED AT THE SOUNDING, DREDGING, AND TRAWLING STATIONS OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER FIRST PART. BY JOHN MURRAY, ONE OF THE NATURALISTS OF THE EXPEDITION, DIRECTOR OF THE WORK CONNECTED WITH THE PUBLICATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE EXPEDITION, AND EDITOR OF THE CHALLENGER REPORT. PREFACE. The literature of the natural sciences during the past few years exhibits', in a remarkable way, the profound influence our fuller knowledge of the deep sea has had on all general conceptions concerning the modifica- tions the surface of the earth is now undergoing and has undergone in past geological times This could not well be otherwise. When- ever science is enriched by a large addition of new facts, a change in theoretical views invariably follows. No complete theory of the earth was possible so long as we were ignorant of the conditions prevailing over the three-fifths of the globe covered by the waters of the ocean. It may fairly be said that since the discoveries of Columbus, Gama, and Magellan in the thirty years from 1492 to 1522, there has been no addition to the knowledge of the surface of our planet that can in any way compare with that acquired by the Challenger and other deep-sea expeditions during the past quarter of a century. The difficulties connected with the exploration of the deeper waters of the great Ocean Basins arise from the fact that the vast majority of the observations are from the nature of the case indirect. At the surface of the ocean direct observation is possible, but our knowledge of the conditions in deep water, and of all that takes place beneath the surface, is wholly dependent on the correct working of instruments, the actions of which are. tor the time, hid from sight. A few years ago the apparatus necessary tor the XX XVI THK VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 8uia(-«>>sftil exploration of the deep sea had not been invented. Thanks to tiii rapid development of many branches of science, and the introduction of numerous instrumental improvements, thoroughly trustworthy results can now U* obtained in the most profound depths. In the Narrative of the Cruise of the Challenger the proceedings of the ship at sea,, the methods employed in deep-sea investigations, the general character of the observations, the excursions of the naturalists land the surveying operations of the naval officers, and the other events of the voyage have been duly chronicled. , In the Physical and Chemical Reports the continuous magnetic and meteorologic observations and the researches into the temperature, the specific gravity, and the chemical composition of sea-water, arc published with abundant illustration. In the extensive series of biological memoirs the new and rare organisms discovered b\ the Expedition are described and figured in great detail. A social volume lias been devoted to a discussion of the composition ami distribution of Deep-Sea Deposits. A very large part of the Challenger b«‘j" »rt thus consists of Special Memoirs, containing a great accumulation <»f r ; t4 ■ t . and many important generalisations in nearly all the branches of Oceanography. The area covered by the ocean is so vast, and the positions at which corn pb te sets of observations have been made are relatively so few, that it is hv'iueuth hazardous, from the information in our possession, to frame g<-ueiai statements with reference to the conditions prevailing over wide ar«-;ts of the deep sea. Even when such statements are prepared by those who have a competent knowledge of all the known observations oi the subject, they do not necessarily supply the information desired by student* engaged in the study of Oceanological problems. Particular observations are usually of more value to the scientific man engaged in a new research than any general statements. The Naturalist frequently wishes to know what observations exist with r. t.-rence t » tin* physical surroundings and biological associations of some animal in which he is interested. The general student or the chemist and geologist, desirous, it may he, of investigating the composition of sea- water or ol deep-sea deposits, often asks for similar information from a particular locality and depth, and he finds it difficult to gather any very PREFACE. XXXV11 satisfactory knowledge of these various details from an examination of the Special Memoirs without great labour. It has appeared to me that, in the present state of science, the most useful and valuable form of summary of the work of the Expedition which I can attempt is a concise statement of the observations carried out, and of the scientific results obtained, at each of the several Challenger Observing Stations at sea. In the following pages, accordingly, summaries of this nature are presented in the belief that these detailed accounts of what has been accomplished at definite localities will not only prove of great assistance to all engaged in the study of oceanic phenomena, but will also serve as a guide to the future explorer who desires to fill up gaps in our knowledge, and to contribute to the rapidly advancing science of Oceanography. Many of the organisms captured m the dredge and trawl did not for various reasons reach the authors of the Special Memoirs. These were chiefly delicate animals, mutilated beyond specific identification by being hauled through the water from great depths, or by expansion of air and other gases relieved from great pressure. A complete list of the animals captured at each station was at the time, however, entered in the Station Book and in the journals of the naturalists together with notes as to the condition of the specimens when taken from the trawl. In the following summaries, the organisms now referred to are always reported in the station lists, in addition to those described in the Special Memoirs. In like manner the names and general character of the organisms taken daily and sometimes hourly in the surface and sub-surface toiv-nets were, after microscopic examination by the naturalists on board ship, entered in the note-books, along with numerous observations concerning the relative abundance of species and other matters of general or special interest. These remarks are now published, except where they have been rendered obsolete by subsequent discoveries. In the preparation of these accounts of the work done, and the results obtained, at the Challenger Stations, I have made use of the official log and note-books, the published reports, and my own journals. 1 have also had in my possession the manuscript journals of my colleagues the late Professor H. N. Moseley and the late Dr. R. von Willemoes-Suhm ; whenever I have made extracts from these, the authority has been given. (summary of results chall. exp. — 1895.) / the voyage of h.m.s. challenger. xxxviii \t , ^nv stations representative of different regions and depths ,j' j|lt» , A-e;t :i, verv complete listv of Diatoms, lvadiolaiia, Foiaminifeia, aIl,l Pteropods, are furnished botli from the collections taken in the surface— u t>, and from the deposits at the bottom. Had it not been for the space they occupy, similar lists might have been inserted from many more s; it’r ■ 1 1 s . The lists of Diatoms have, in the great majority of cases, been „ - j.li, 1 to me by Mr. Thomas Comber from an examination of the surface - ith. rin— and the samples of deep-sea deposits. The lists of Foraminifera ; , l ; . prepared irom an examination ot my own preparations, and from , . ,1 tions ^elected from the desposits by Mr. Frederick Pearcey, assistant to i . 1 1 : 1 1 1 : rali st s on board the Challenger, and for several years an assistant in the ( iiallenger Office, but I have also made use of a manuscript note-book which belonged to the late Mr. H. B. Brady. The lists of Radiolaria from the surfaer waters and from the deposits have been supplied to me by Professor Haeckel and Dr. Drover from a study of the Challenger collections. Th.- station summaries are preceded by a historical introduction in which 1 avc endeavoured to trace, and with the aid of a series of maps to illustrate, th,. ideal development of our knowledge concerning the ocean from t dnv 1 of history down to the time of the Challenger Expedition. For . - u mcc and advice in this portion of the work I desire to acknowledge my i h dness t" the lati Professor W. Robertson Smith, to Dr. J. Sutherland B1 ac k. Mr. George Murray, and especially to my colleague Professor A. Kmard. in collaboration with whom notes concerning the progress of h; . i . .< I, faring on Oceanography were collected seven or eight years ago i . >ui joint work on Deep-Sea Deposits; many of these notes have been Me u c of iii writing the Historical Introduction to these volumes. I - • at "ii summaries are followed by lists setting forth the geographical d ithvmetrieal distribution of the animals captured in the various trawling- and dredgings. Many theoretical considerations are suggested by tl 1 i > t : and the observations set forth in the body of the work, but for vari"n- reasons I have in this place merely indicated in the concluding paragraphs the nature of some of these interesting speculations. T - : : unary account of the observations and scientific results of the ( b din ■ Expedition is brought to a close by a complete index of the ra. sub-genera, species, and varieties of marine organisms captured at PREFACE. XXXIX the various dredging and trawling stations, which, in a manner, will serve as an index to the whole Report : for on turning to the station list, in which the name of a species occurs, a reference will be found to the memoir in which it is described in detail. I desire to acknowledge the services, in the preparation of this index, of Mr. James Chmnley, Mr. A. R. Scott, Miss Sclater, Mrs. Weir, and Mrs. Murray. The temperature diagrams and detailed charts showing the positions of the Challenger sounding, temperature and dredging stations were originally prepared by Staff-Commander Tizard, F.R.S., of the Hydrographic Office, for the Narrative of the Cruise, and are now reproduced with additional infor- mation. I am also indebted to Captain Tizard for supplying me with data for the bathymetrical charts Ia, Ib, and Ic from the latest information in possession of the Hydrographic Department of the Admiralty. In constructing these bathymetrical charts, as well as the maps illustrating the historical introduction, I have had much assistance from Mr. J. G. Bartholomew and Mr. Frederick Bosse. For many years I have been assisted in the Editorial and other work connected with the Challenger Publications by Mr. James Chumley, and in the preparation of these Summary Volumes for the press, as well as in the correction of the proofs, I cannot speak too highly of the services Mr. Chumley has rendered. J. M. H.M.S. Challenger preparing to Sound. 1872. “. . . bearded like the pard. Seeking the bubble reputation.'' —As You Like It. CONTENTS. FIRST PART. PAGE Preface, • . . . . . . . ... . . xxxv Historical Introduction : — A. — The Science of Oceanography, ........ 1 f B. — Oceanographical Views of the Ancients, . . . . . . .2. C. — Oceanographical Views during the Dark Ages, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance, . 29 D. — Progress of Oceanographical Knowledge, from the Voyage of Magellan to the Voyages of Cook, 46 E. — The Progress of Oceanography from the Time of Cook to the Challenger Expedition, . 68 F. — The Explorations of the Challenger, and subsequent Expeditions, . . . .103 General Summary of the Scientific Observations and Results at each of the Challenger Observing Stations, ........ 107 A. — Atlantic Ocean (outward voyage) :• — Cape Finisterre to Lisbon. PAGE PAGE Station I., 109 Station Id., . Ill „ Ia. to Ic., , 110 Lisbon to Gibraltar. Stations II. and IIa., . .Ill Station TIL, . . 116 „ IIb. to Iln., . 115 „ TV-, • 117 „ IIj. and IIk., . 116 Gibraltar to Madeira. Station V., 119 Station VIIa., . 123 Va ,, V A. j . 121 „ VIIb. to VIIf., 123 „ VI., . 121 „ Vila, to VIIj. . 125 „ VII., . 122 Animals from Madeira, 125 xlii . THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. % Madeira to Tenerife. PAGE 1 Station VI Ik., 125 Station VIII., „ VI Iu to VI Is., . 125 Animals from the Canary „ VII t. to VI I v., . 131 I Tenerife to Sombrero. Station 1, . 136 | Station 13, A • 137 „ 14, . „ 3, . . 140 1 „ 15, • „ 4. . 143 „ '16, . „ 5, 144 ,, 1 G „ 6, . 145 „ 18, . „ i , • . 146 „ 19, • „ 8, . . 146 „ 20, . „ 9. . 147 21 „ 10, . 148 •22 ,, -i „ 11, . 149 23 to 23b, „ 12, - 150 Animals from St Thomas St. Thomas to Bermuda. Station 24, . 170 Station 30, 25, . 183 ,, 31 to 32a, " 26, . 184 „ 32b, . ., 27, . . 185 ,, 32c to 32g, „ 28, . . 185 „ 33, . „ 29, . 186 Bermuda to Halifax. Station* 33a to 34, . 199 Station 42, „ 35a to 35c, . . 199 „ 43, . ,, 36. . . 201 „ 44, . „ 37, . . 203 „ 45, . ., 38. . . 204 „ 46, . „ 39; . 205 „ 47, . .. 40, , 205 „ 48, . „ 41, . 206 Halifux to Bermuda. Station 49, 223 i Station 54, „ 30. . . 228 „ 55 and 55a, . „ 51, . . 230 „ 55n and 56, . „ 52, . . 231 „ 57 to 57b, ,, 52a. . 232 Animals from Bermuda, „ 53, . 232 PAGE 131 135 151 153 154 155 156 157 158 158 159 159 161 168 187 190 190 192 192 207 208 209 212 216 218 220 233 235 236 238 239 CONTENTS. xliii Bermuda to Azores. PAGE PAGE Station 58, . 246 Station 68, 256 „ 59, . . 246 „ 69, . . 257 „ 60, . . 247 „ 70, . 258 „ 61, . . 248 „ 71, . . 262 „ 62, . . 249 „ 72, . 263 „ 63, . . 250 „ 73, . . 264 „ 64, . 252 „ 74, . . 268 » 65, . . 254 ,, 75, . . 269 „ 66, . 255 „ 76, . . 278 » 67, . . 255 77 J? * * > . 280 Azores to Madeira. Station 78, . 281 Station 81, . 289 „ 79, . . 288 „ 82, . . 290 „ 80, . ' . . 289 „ 83, . . 291 Madeira to Cap 3 Verde Islands. Station 84, . 291 Station 90, 299 „ 85, . . • 292 ,, 91, . . 300 „ 86, . . 295 92 . 301 » 87, . . 296 „ 93 to 93c, . 302 „ 88, . 297 „ 93d to 94, . 303 „ 89, . . 298 Animals from Cape Verdes, . 304 St. Vincent to St. Paul’s Bocks. Station 95, . 315 Station 1 03, . . 326 „ 96, . . 316 „ 104, . 328 „ 97, . . 317 „ 105, . . 330 „ 98, . 318 „ 106, . . 331 ,, 99, . 320 ,, 10/, . . 335 „ 100, . . 321 „ 108, . . 337 „ 101, . . 323 „ 109, . . 338 „ 102, . . 325 „ 109a to 109d, . . . 340 St. Paul’s Bocks to Fernando Noronka. Station 110, . . 340 Stations 112 to 113a, . . 342 „ HI, • . 341 Animals from Fernando Noronha, . 343 Fernando Noronha to Pernambuco. Stations 113b to 115, . . 346 Station ll 8, . . 348 „ 116, . . 346 „ 119, . . 349 „ 117 and 1 17a, . 347 xliv THE VOYAGE of H.M.S. CHALLENGER *> Between Pernambuco and Bahia. SUtions 120 and 121, PAGE . 349 Stations 125 to 126a, . 122 to 122c, . 355 „ 127, . „ 123, . 124, . . 366 „ 1-38, . . 366 Animals from Bahia, . Bahia to Tristan da Cunha. Station 129, . . 379 Station 133, . „ 130. . . 381 „ 134, . 131, . . 382 „ 135 to 135g, . ” 132. . . 384 Animals from Tristan da Cunha, Tristan da Cunha to Cape of Good Hope. Sutton 136, . . 400 Station 139, . 137. . . 401 „ 140, . «« „ 138, . . 402 Animals from Cape of Good Hope R — Southern Ocean1: — Cape of Good Hope to Marion Island. Station 141, . . 416 * Station 144, . „ 142, . . 418 „ 144a to 145a, „ 143, . 425 Marion Island to Crozet Islands. Station 146, . . * . 443 Station 147a, . 147. . . 450 „ 148 and 148a, Off Kerguelen Island. Station* 149 to 149k, . • . Between Kerguelen and Heard Islands. Sutton 150, . . 482 | Station 151, . Near Antarctic Ice. SUUoo 152, . . 493 Station 155, . „ 153, . . 195 „ 156, . * 164, . . 499 Termination Land to Melbourne. Station 157, . . 505 j Station 159, . 158, . . 017 „ 160, . i Th ab-hcading ha* been inadvertently omitted on page 11<>. PAGE 368 370 370 371 385 388 389 391 403 404 405 428 430 456 457 460 487 501 501 523 525 CONTENTS. xlv C. — Pacific Ocean : — Melbourne to Sydney. PAGE Station 161, . . 530 Station 163a, . „ 162, . . 535 Animals from Port Jackson, „ 163, . . 546 Sydney to New Zealand. Stations 163c to 164c, . 576 Station 165c, . „ 164d, . 583 „ 166, . „ 164b, . 583 „ 166c, . „ 165, . . 584 „ 167, . „ 165a, . 586 Animals from New Zealand, „ 165b, . 588 New Zealand to Tongatabu. Station 168, . . 600 Station 171a, . „ 169, . . 605 „ 172 and 172a, . „ 170 and 170a, . 611 Animals from Tongatabu, „ 171, . 618 Fiji Islands. Stations 173 and 173a, . 632 Animals from Fiji, „ 174 to 174d, . . 635 Fiji to Raine Island. Station 175, . . 662 Station 181, . „ 176, . . 664 „ 182, . „ 177, . . 665 » 183, . „ 178, . . 669 „ 184, . „ 179, . . 670 „ 185 to 185b, . „ 180, . 672 Off Cape York, Stations 186 and 187, . 688 [ Animals from Cape York, Arafura Sea. Stations 188, 189, and 190, . 717 | Animals from Arrou Islands, Arrou Islands to Banda. Station 191, . . 737 Station 193, . „ 191a, . . 741 „ 194 and 194a, „ 192, . . 742 Animals from Banda, . Banda to Amboina. Station 195, . . 757 | Animals from Amboina, (summary of results chall. exp. — 1895.) PAGE 546 552 589 590 593 593 595 622 622 • 623 642 673 677 677 678 682 689 735 750 751 755 760 TTTE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Amboina to Samboangan. Station 196, . „ 197, . Animals from Tern ate. PAGE 766 Station 198, . PAGE . 770 . 768 „ 199, .... . 773 . 769 „ 200 . 775 Station 201, . „ 202. . . ' Samboangan to Manila. 779 i Station 203, . . 783 . 782 „ 204 to 204b, . . . 787 Manila to Hong Kong. Station 205, . . 791 Animals from Hong Kong, 794 SECOND PART. Hong Kong to Manila. Station 206, Manila to Samboangan. Station 207, . . 800 Station 2 10a, „ 208, . . 802 „ 211, . „ 209, . . 808 „ 212, . . „ 210, . . 813 Animals from Philippines, Samboangan to New Guinea. Station 213, . . 836 Station 216, . 21 1, . . 838 „ 216a, . 215 •t • . 844 „ 217, . New Guinea to Admiralty Islands. Station 218, . . 853 | Animals from Admiralty Islands Admiralty Islands to Yokohama. Station 219, . . 863 Station 230, . 99 220, . . 866 „ 231, . 221, . . 868 „ 232, . 222 . 870 „ 233 and 233a, ft 223, . s • . 872 „ 233b, . ft 224, • # . 874 „ 233o, . ft 225, . . 877 „ 234, . ft 226, , . 882 „ 235, . tv 227, . . 884 „ 236 and 236a, ft 228, . . 886 Animals from Japan, . tt 229, . . 887 797 816 816 817 822 846 846 849 858 890 898 896 905 912 914 915 916 920 923 CONTENTS. xlvii Yokohama to Sandwich Islands. Station 237, „ 23S, „ 239, „ 240, „ 241, „ 242, „ 243, „ 244, „• 245, „ 246, „ 247, „ 248, „ 249, Station 262, „ 263, „ 264, „ 265, „ 266, „ 267, „ 268, „ 269, „ 270, „ 271, Station 280, „ 281, „ 282, „ 283, „ 284, „ 285, „ 286, „ 287, „ 288, „ 289, Station 299, » 300, „ 301, PAGE .932 Station 250, . . 940 „ 251, . 942 „ 252, . . . . •. . 943 „ 253, . . .-. 945 „ 254, . 951 „ 255, 952 „ 256, . 954 „ 257, . 959 „ 258, .961 „ 259, .966 „ 260, . 968 „ 261, . 970 Animals from Sandwich Islands, Sandwich Islands to Tahiti. . 1003 Station 272, . . 1005 „ 273, . . . . 1007 „ 274, . 1009 „ 275, . 1013 „ 276, . 1018 „ 277, .... . 1020 „ 278, .... . 1025 „ -279 to 279c, .... . 1029 Animals from Tahiti, .... . 1034 Tahiti to Valparaiso. . 1077 Station 290, ..... . 1079 „ 291, . 1081 » 292, . 1082 „ 293, . 1083 „ 294, . 1086 „ 295, . 1090 „ 296, . 1092 „ 297, . 1094 „ 29S, . 1096 Animals from Valparaiso, Valparaiso to Gulf of Penas. . 1121 Station 302, ..... . 1127 ,, 303, .... . 1132 PAGE 971 973 975 977 981 983 984 987 988 990 991 993 994 1048 1054 1057 1063 1C64 1068 1069 1070 1072 1098 1099 1101 1102 1105 1107 1109 1113 1115 1120 1133 1137 xlviii THF VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. y v ; Vn s uajt, anil other Channels between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans : Gulf of Pcfias to Sandy Point through Magellan Strait. Station 304, . „ 303 to 305b, . M 306 and 306a, 307, „ 308, . PAGE 1139 1142 1144 1146 1149 Stations 309 and 309a, „ 310, . „ 311, . „ 312, . • Animals from Magellan Strait, E —Atlantic Ocean (homeward voyage) : — Sandy Point to Falkland Islands. Station 313, . . 1167 Animals from Falkland „ 314, . * . 1172 and 316), . h 314a, • • . 1174 Falkland Islands to Rio de la Plata. Station 317, . . 1181 Station 319, . ti 318, . • • . 1183 „ 320, . Rio dc la Plata to Tristan da Cunha. Station 321, . . 1193 Station 328, . „ 322. . . 1196 „ 329, . „ 323, . . 1197 „ 330, . „ 324, . . 1202 „ 331, . 325, . . 1203 „ 332, . „ 326, . . 1208 ,, 333, . *i 327, . . 1209 „ 334, . •> Tristan da Cunha to Ascension Island. Station 335, . • . 1223 Station 340, . 336. . . 1227 „ 341, . „ 337, . . 1228 „ 342, . „ 338, . . 1229 „ 343, . „ 339, . . 1232 Animals from Ascension Ascension Island to St. Vincent Station 344, . . . 1241 Station 349, . „ 345, . . 1244 tt 350, . „ 346, . 1245 „ 351, . „ 347, . . ' . 1248 „ 352, . „ 348. . . 1252 PAGE 1154 1156 1159 1163 1165 1175 1185 1186 1210 1211 1212 1213 1215 1219 1221 1233 1234 1236 1237 1240 1256 1257 1259 1260 CONTENTS. xlix St Vincent towards Azores. PAGE . PAGE Station 353, ..... 1264 | Station 354, . . . .1267 Eemarks on the foregoing Station Lists, ... ..... 1271 Bathymetrical and Geographical Distribution, . . . . .1275 1. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in the Zone deeper than 2500 fathom.', . 1 277 2. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in Depths between 2000 and 2500 fathoms, . . . . . . ... 1283 3. Animals obtained in the Dj edgings and Trawlings in Depths between 1500 and 2000 fathoms, .......... 1291 4. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in Depths between 1000 and 1500 fathoms, . . . . . ■ . . . 1302 5. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in Depths between 500 and 1000 fathoms, .......... 1314 6. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in Depths between 100 and 500 fathoms, .......... 1328 7. Animals obtained in the Dredgings and Trawlings in Depths under 100 fathoms, . . 1362 General Observations on the Distribution of Marine Organisms, . . 1431 Explanation of Charts and Diagrams (Appendix I.), . . . . . 1463 Index of Genera, Sub-genera, Species, and Varieties, . . . 1465 General Index, . . . . ... . . . • 1575 Sifting Deposit. % LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. 1 MAPS ILLUSTRATING THE HISTORY OF OCEANOGRAPHY. Plate I., . i) Map showing the Phoenician Colonies and supposed extent of Phoenician Voyages at sea. i i Map shoe ing the Voyage of the Argonauts according to the Traditions of the Ancients. (<•) Map showing the World according to Homer, B.c. 1000. ( t) Map showing the World according to Hecataeus, b.c. 500. Plate 11., i,i) Map howing the World according to Herodotus, b.c. 450. (b) Map showing the World according to Dicaearchus, b.c. 300. Plate III i) Map showing the World according to Eratosthenes, b.c. 220. (b) 'lap showing the World according to Hipparchus, b.c. 150. Plate IV., (a) Map showing the World according to Strabo, a.d. 18. (b) Map showing the World according to Mela, a.d. 43. (r) Map showing the World according to Ptolemy, a.d. 150. Plate V., ....••••• (a) World Map of Cosmas lndicopleustes — VI. Century. , , Th Mountain of Cosmas lndicopleustes causing Day and Night and the Seasons. (e) Wheel Map— Imago Mundi, XL Century. y.i) Reduc' d Facsimile Map from the Gotha MS. of the Book of Climates, written a.d. 1173, from Mueller's Isstakhry. ,) M i- Mi in ■ Quadrans Habitabilis according to Abu llihan Birunensis, a.d. 1030. Plate VI., . . . • ■ i Map lu ■ wing tie Atlantic Ocean according to Toscanelli, a.d. 1474. The western part is wcnriAtructi-d from M. Behaiin’s globe, the eastern part from charts of the XV. Century. After H. Wagner. (b) Map shewing the World according to Ortelius, a.d. 1570. Plate VII., Map the WuiM showing the Great Discoveiies 1492-1522; with inset showing the Dis- coveries of the Norsemen from 867-1347 a.d. Plate VII! M ' f the World ’ bowing principal Maritime Explorations from the time of Cook, 1768, to the Challenger Ex ] edition, 1876 ; voyages from 1768-1833. Plate IX., '•I .; of th* World .showing principal Maritime Explorations from the time of Cook, 1768, to the Challenger Expedition, 1876 ; voyages from 1830 to 1876. PAGE 10 16 20 28 32 42 46 70 72 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS, II. CHARTS SHOWING THE DREDGING AND SOUNDING STATIONS. First Part. Chart 1 1. Hemisphere showing depths in the Atlantic Ocean, lb. „ „ Pacific Ocean, >in pocket of cover to First Part. lc. „ „ Indian Ocean, J 2. England to the Canary Islands, touching at Lisbon, Gibraltar, and Madeira ; also towards England from the Cape Verde Islands, touching at Vigo, ...... 3. In the vicinity of Lisbon, .......... 4. In the vicinity of Madeira Island, ......... 5. In the vicinity of the Canary Islands, ........ 6. Canary Islands to St. Thomas, St. Thomas to Bermuda, Bermuda to the Azores, Azores to Madeira, and Madeira to Cape Verde Islands : also towards England from the Cape Verde Islands, 7. In the vicinity of the Virgin Islands, ........ 8. In the vicinity of Bermuda, ......... 9. Bermuda to Halifax, crossing the Gulf Stream in the meridian of 70° W., and Halifax to Bermuda crossing the Gulf Stream in the meridian of 63° W., ...... 10. In the vicinity of the Azores, ......... 11. In the vicinity of the Cape Verde Islands, ........ 12. Cape Verde Islands to Bahia, touching at St. Paul’s Rocks and Fernando Noronha ; also Ascension to Cape Verde Islands, ......... 13. In the vicinity of St. Paul’s Rocks, ........ 14. In the vicinity of Fernando Noronha, ........ 15. In the vicinity of the Coast of Brazil, ........ 16. Bahia to the Cape of Good Hope, touching at the Tristan da Cunha Islands ; also Monte Video to Ascension, . . . . . . . . . 17. In the vicinity of the Tristan da Cunha Islands, ....... 18. Cape of Good Hope to the parallel of 60° S., touching at the islands of Marion, Crozet, Kerguelen, and Heard, ........... 19. In the vicinity of Prince Edward and Marion Islands, ...... 20. In the vicinity of the Crozet Islands, ........ 21. In the vicinity of Kerguelen Island, ........ 22. In the vicinity of Heard Island, ......... 23. In the neighbourhood of the Antarctic Circle, between the 78th and 98th meridians of east longitude, showing the position of Pack Ice and floating Icebergs encountered, .... 24. From a position in lat. 59° 56' S., long. 99° 14' E. to Melbourne, ..... 25. Melbourne to Sydney, ....•••••• 26. In the vicinity of Sydney, N.S.W., ....... 27. Sydney to Wellington, touching at Port Hardy and Queen Charlotte Sound; V ellington to Fiji Islands, touching at Tongatabu ; and Fiji Islands to Cape York, touching at Api Island and Raine Islet, 28. In the vicinity of Tongatabu, 29. In the vicinity of Matuku Island, ..••••■ 30. In the vicinity of Ngaloa Harbour, Fiji Islands, ...... 31. Cape York to Hong Kong, touching at the Arrou Islands, Ki Islands, Banda Islands, Aarboinj. Island, Ternate Island, Samboangan, Ilo Ilo, and Manila ; also Hong Kong to \ okohama, touching at Manila, Zebu, Samboangan, Humboldt Bay, and the Admiralty Islands, RAGE 110 112 126 136 138 170 192 220 280 304 316 340 344 350 380 390 416 430 456 460 488 502 526 550 552 576 622 632 642 71S lii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Chart page 32. In the vicinity of the Arrou and Ki Islands, . . . . . .742 33. In the vicinity of the Eanda Islands, ........ 756 Second Part. 34. Nares Harbour, Admiralty Islands, ........ 858 35. In the vicinity of Japan, ........ . 924 36. Yokohama to the Sandwich Islands, ........ 990 37. In the vicinity of the Sandwich Islands, ........ 994 38. Sandwich Islands to Tahiti ; also Tahiti to Valparaiso, touching at Juan Fernandez Island, . 1070 39. In the vicinity of Tahiti, .......... 1072 40. Valparaiso to Port Otway, . . . . ... . . .1136 41. Port Otway through Magellan Strait, touching at Hale Cove, Gray Harbour, Port Grappler, Tom Ray, I’uerto Bueno, Isthmus Bay, Port Churruca, Port Famine, Sandy Point, and Elizabeth bland, ........... 1166 42. Magellan Strait to the Falkland Islands and Monte Video, . . . . . .1186 43. In the vicinity of Ascension, ......... 1240 III. DIAGRAMS SHOWING THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF TEMPERATURE IN THE OCEAN. First Part. Diagram 1. Longitudinal section, Tenerife to Sombrero, . . . . . . .168 2. Diagonal section, Bermuda towards New York ; also Meridional section, Halifax to St. Thomas, . 240 3. Longitudinal section, Bermuda to the Azores and Madeira, ..... 246 l. Longitudinal section, from a position in lat. 3° 8' N., long. 14° 39' W. to Pernambuco, . . 348 5. Diagonal section, Abrolhos Island to Tristan da Cunha Islands, ..... 382 6. Longitudinal section, Rio de la Plata to Tristan da Cunha Islands and the Cape of Good Hope, 392 7. Meridional section, the Azores to the Tristan da Cunha Islands, ..... 400 8. Meridional section, Cape of Good Hope to the parallel of 46“ S., . . . . . 418 9. Meridional section between the parallels of 50° and 65° S. lat., ..... 524 iU. Diagonal section, from a position in lat. 53 55' S., long. 108° 35' E. to Cape Otway, . . 528 11. Longitudinal section, Sydney, N.S.W., to Porirua, Cook Strait, New Zealand, . . 578 12. Meridional section, Kandavu Island to Cape Palliser, New Zealand, .... 596 13. Longitudinal section, Fiji Islands to the Barrier Reef, Australia, ..... 682 14. 1 1 i gram showing the Distribution of Temperature in the Seas enclosed by the Islands of the Eastern Archipelago, ........... 794 Second Part. I V longitudinal section, Meangis Isla.ids to the Admiralty Islands, ..... 854 16. Meridional section, Admiralty Islands to Japan, ....... 894 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. liii Diagram page 17. Longitudinal section, Japan to a position in lat. 35° 49' N., long. 180’' W., . . . 966 18. Longitudinal section, from a position in lat. 35° 49' N., long. 180° W. to a position in lat. 38" 9' N., long. 156° 25' W., .......... 992 19. Meridional section, from the parallel of 38° N. to the parallel of 40° S., . . . 1068 20. Longitudinal section, from a position in lat. 40° 3' S., long. 132° 58' W. towards Mocha Island, . 1114 21. Meridional section, off the rvest Coast of South America, between the 33rd and 46th parallels, 1138 22. Meridional section, Falkland Islands to the parallel of 35° 40' S., ..... 1196 Trawl, Dredge, Tow-net, Water-bottle, Sounding Machine, and Sieves. (summary of results chall. exp. 1895.) ERRATA. Page 1310, line 4, insert “T ” after Serupocellaria maeandrei. 1330, „ 14 from foot, insert “ S” after Acantliogorgia ramosmima. 1334. „ 6, for “ N ” read “ T ” after Par archaster spinosissimus. „ 1337, „ 10, insert “ S ” after Aphrodita echidna. 1 345, „ 15, insert “ T ” after Bittium, three species undetermined. ■ HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION. A— THE SCIENCE OF OCEANOGRAPHY. Down till tlie early part of the present century the observation of marine phenomena was almost exclusively limited to the surface and sub-surface waters of the ocean. In the interests of navigation the hydrographer had undertaken a survey of coasts, an examination of oceanic routes useful for commerce, and a discussion of the winds, tides, and currents by which these were affected, but the observations of the biologist, the chemist, and geologist did not extend beyond the shallow water surrounding the dry land, nor deeper than a few fathoms. Our knowledge of the ocean was. literally speaking superficial. No systematic attempts had been made to ascertain the physical and biological conditions of that vast region of the earth’s surface occupied by the deeper waters of the ocean : the apparatus necessary for such investigations had not yet been invented. The desire to establish telegraphic communication between Europe and America gave the first direct impulse towards a systematic exploration of the deep sea The mprovement in methods and apparatus within recent years has been so rapid that it is now possible to examine the most profound depths of the ocean with great precision. The recognition of oceanography as a distinct branch of science may be said to date from the commencement of deep-sea researches. The oceanographer takes account of everything relating to the ocean , his investiga- tions deal with the form and divisions of all marine areas on. the surface of the globe, the winds that blow over the surface waters, the contours of the ocean bed from tin sea-level down to the greatest depths, the temperature, the circulation, the physical am. 1 chemical properties of sea-water, the currents, tides, waves, the composition and distribution of marine deposits, the nature and distribution of marine organisms t f surface, in the intermediate waters, and on the floor of the ocean, as well as the modifications brought about in living things by the conditions of their existence, il relations of man to the ocean in the development of fisheries, commerce, civilisation, navigation, hydrography, and maritime meteorology. All this vast assemblage *i knowledge, which embraces some aspects of astronomy, geography, geolog}’, phy- • >. chemistry, and the biological sciences, makes up the modern science of oceanograpl. (SUMMARY OF RESULTS CHALL. EXP. — 1894.) Progress of Knowledge con- cerning the Ocean. The Modern Science of Oceanography. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. WuHK ur THK Oiui.us>-«.an Kxrrmnox. Ti rl w r Expedition has played a very large part in all the recent advances an.. graphical knowledge. The Official Reports on the Scientific Results of the ; ; x : , ■ ■ i i. di al more or less directly with all those branches of knowledge which, we • v, cii, constitute the science of oceanography. In order to fully .appreciate the , -nli - it which science has arrived in our own time, it is essential to cast a retrospective , at the i«leas and opinions held by past generations of explorers and philosophers. I i iv proposed to preface this volume, containing a summary account of the work ; board the Challenger, with a somewhat detailed account of the gradual develop- ,,t (if knowledge concerning the ocean. Even a rapid chronological exposition of the n.ar h of ideas on the science of the ocean cannot completely ignore the progress of v Tices. Discove ries in astronomy and physics have often had more influence . 1 the progress of oceanography than the most perilous and distant voyages. Facts ’ r\i d 1-y the ancients have sometimes directed the thoughts of modern investigators; ’ r i 1 1 lt periods of apparent lethargy great ideas have germinated in some superior minds. /?.— OCEANOGRAPHICAL VIEWS OF THE ANCIENTS. Kxovucdge or PklMITIVB Peorue*. Vrr»< or the Hnurr. in. . veil, a xpeditions of the heroic ages created great enthusiasm among the poet- of antiquity. Their narratives of the first nautical expeditions are of great K-.-rcst to the historian and literary man, for the ancients knew well how to clothe primitive records of civilisation and commerce with all the charm of their language il l ! imagination, hut they teach us nothing from the point of view of thescience f tiv ' . The Pacific islanders, at the present time, are probably in the same phase i p: . - v re the civilised nations at the birth of navigation. The Polynesian i - 1 bl i ■ to steer his boat to a safe port in a known group of islands, but he knows only ro ite. and lie departs not from it. Should a current carry him away, he is forced ■ " a i In Ipl'K-Iy over the surface of the boundless ocean. His knowledge is quite •1 tin r. i- no scientific union among its different parts. The sea, for him, is uply i me a ; . - of transport, and a vast reservoir for the supply of his alimentary In ill- infancy of humanity, as to-day among savages, there was no geography, • 1 p. ntly, no H'ientific notions on oceanography. It is only as man rises from a' ry mi I through barbarism to a state of civilisation, and as commercial relations i • . l.-lvd, that ideas, at first vague and uncertain, can be traced concerning the phenomena of the ocean. Tin . I -1 wi i tings - ontain very few topographical details. The conceptions of the •' h p< oj ! about nature were extremely vague. The Hebrews were not a maritime p! ", and < >n -< •queiitly we do not find in biblical literature any ver)" definite m r-L' 'rdiiiLT the sea. The following passages: “He hath compassed the waters SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 3 with bounds ;’n “I take the wings of the morning and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea ;”2 “ He set a compass (circle) upon the face of the depth ;”3 all seem to indicate that the Jews held the same general opinions as to the distribution of land and water as prevailed among the Greeks of the Homeric period. The expression in Genesis, “ Let the waiters under- the heaven be gathered together unto one place,” 4 and a passage in Esdras : “ Upon he third day thou didst command that the waters should be gathered in the seventh part of the earth, six parts hast thou dried up and kept them,” 5 have been cited to show that they believed that only a seventh part of the surface of the world was covered by the waters of the ocean. Some of these passages were cited by Columbus in the fifteenth century to prove that the Atlantic could not be of any great extent. The book of Esdras, however, was written after the time of Christ, probably quite late in the first century of our era, and is no evidence for old Jewish belief. The author of Esdras merely shares a view widely held in his time, according to which the earth was divided into seven zones or climates. The view that the Hebrews believed the land to be much less extended than the ocean cannot be said to be well founded.6 Maritime commerce was almost unknown to the Egyptians, who appear to have had at The Egyptian - all times an antipathy to everything connected with the sea. We do not find anything in the history of this ancient people wdiich indicates that they took any part in discoveries relating to oceanography; their ships, as for instance in the voyage of Necho, appear always to have been manned by Phoenician sailors.7 It is among maritime and commercial nations, who must familiarise themselves with the phenomena of the sea, that we find the first true ideas concerning the morphology of the ocean. Long before the Greeks had emerged from a state of barbarism, and long before the The Phoenicians oldest Greek and Hebrew records, the Phoenicians had settled all over the Mediterranean. The earliest notices represent them as a nation of clever navigators, capable of making distant voyages. In pursuit of commerce, they traversed the Mediterranean, that great enclosed sea presenting fewer difficulties to navigation than the Erythraean Sea or Indian Ocean, from whence they are supposed to have originally emigrated.8 At first they 1 Job, xxvi. 10. 2 Psalms, cxxxix. 9. 3 Proverbs, viii. 27. 4 Genesis, i 9. 5 II. (IV.) Esdras, cliap. vi. v 41, “ Et tertia die imperasti aquis congregari in septima parte terra?.” c Humboldt, Examen critique de l’bistoire de la geographie du nouveau continent et des progres de l’astrononiie nautique au 15n,-: et 16rae sitcles, Paris, 1836, tom. i. p. 188. Humboldt states that the Hindus, like th • Hebrews, had seven zones and seven climates, but with the Hindus the seven terrestrial zones are separated by seven seas In this arrangement, however, the total mass of the liquid zones is not limited— among the zones are the bizarre, rather than poetic, seas of curdled mill fc, of sugar, and of clarified hitter. 7 E. H. Bunbury, History of Ancient Geography, vol. i. p. 3, London, 1883. 8 As stated above, the Phoenicians knew the Erythraean Sea. Herodotus (I., 1 ; VII., 89) reports that they came from the coasts of that sea to settle down on the shores of the Mediterranean during historical times. This opinion is admitted by several modern historians, among others by Movers (Die Phcenizier, Bd. i., pp. 9-12). The weight t modern judgment appears to lie against this view. Kenrick (Phoenicia, p. 52) rejects it. (See also Bunburv, op. at., v< 1. i p. 5, note 3 ; Konrad Kretschmer, Die Entdeckung Amerika’s in ihrer Bedeutung fiir die Geschichte des W. Y i!V, p. 12, Berlin, 1892; Ency. Brit., art. “Phoenicia,” by Prof. A. von Gutschmid; The Ruined Cities of Mashonaland, by J. T. Bent, London, 1892; Rawlinson’s Hist, of Phoenicia, London. 1889, p. 53; Pietschmann. C.-.hichte r Phcenizier, Berlin, 1889, p. 113.) 4 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. PmESIClAN VoTAGE*. taded ag fa Egypt,1 then to Syrtis, and, establishing colonies everywhere on their they arrived at the Pillars of Hercules. At this point there opened before them the at ocean. The Phoenicians are believed to have recognised in the Atlantic an ocean similar to the Erythraean Sea, and to have conceived the idea of a iter surrounding all lai From Grades and other settlements : rsof Hercuh a they braved the great ocean itself; they sailed along the v, , ,(, rii coast of Africa, discovered the Canaries, and Humboldt considers it very probable ! tli' y were acquainted with the Sargasso Sea, into which the} had been perhaps . v. i, by easterly winds. ' They extended their excursions towards the northern parts Vth ntic, and discovered the Cassiterides,4 where they went in search of tin, of which i he x ■ rved the monopoly by*toncealing-its source from rival nations. In the u .. Geachichte der Erdkunde und de jen, Berlin, 1861, pp. 16 d seq. The fii-.it indications . f • > i niciniit in Hebrew literature, however, represent them at the time of Solomon as already making Tarshisb, which appears to answer to Tartessus in the south of Spain (see Dr Smith’s Dictionary of Biblical Antiquities, yol iiL, article “Tarshish,” by Twisleton, cited by Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i p. 5, note). That Tar-1 i-h-Tnrtes.-m, Turdetania (basin of Guadalquivir) is certain. . I- . t oni. Um believed that tbe word ocean was derived from a Tunic or Hebrew word signifying a circle or ir am fere i • ml that th< word ocean lias thus been preserved, a monument, as it were, to the discoveries of the ,-ce Humboldt, op. cit., tom. i. p. 33; Ritter, op. cit., p. 21). This derivation has been wholly r. i a liatcd by modem philologists. ... , Humboldt, op. cit., tom. iii. p. 91 ; see also M. P. Merrifield on “Gulf-Weed,” Nature, vol. xvm. p. 708, 1878. qaseo is said to have been first applied to the gulf-weed by the sailors of Vasco da Gama on their return India . i 14to. It is said to be a Tortuguese name for water-cress (Nasturtium) (sec Linschoten, Hist. Orient., :t ji Kretschmer (op. • it., p. 165) and Kriimmel (Reisebeschreibung der Plankton-Expedition, p. 118) do not admit inted with tie Sargasso Sea. Columbus, they hold, was the first to visit that part of ^ Y v g wet d l- frequently driven to the eastward of the westermost of the Azores (Corvo and Flores), and it i- altogethei that tl ■ PI ni ians were acquainted with the floating gulf-weed, although they may ..... i „ the Sargasso Sea, properly so-called. The discovery of Carthaginian and Cyrenian coins \ .. — ia often cited as evidence that the Phoenicians had extended their voyages ; ins wen in the hands of Johan Podolyn, evidently a member of the Gothenburg x. . Lit ransactions the description of the coins is published with figures. Podolyn , Florez, on visiting him in Madrid. The nine coins figured in the paper two , v>.: ... : i five Cai thaginian < ipper coins, two Cyrenian copper coins were selected by Florez, as the „ . .. ... |, .in 1. i quantity first vent to Lisbon and thence to Madrid to the Padre Florez. 71„ ... , ..i. m November 1749, after some days of westerly storms, been found on the coast of Corvo, in a black c v. -1, broken by the -torm. They were first sent to a convent on the island, and then some to Lisbon, ; A l the i afire Florez in Madrid received them (Nagra Anmarkuingar om de Gamles Sjbfart, i . ■ rtha isisl chCyi ka Mynt, fondue ftr 1740, pften aide Acoriska Oarhe, ai fohan 1 odolj n ; |. IV, ten r. aj ocli Witteihets Samhallets Handlinger Wetenskaps Afdelningen, F first Stycket, . it; -. - . bit bad no doubt about the truth of these statements, and regrets that no full account •he \ i m which tbe coin.- were found. The positive statements about the discovery of Phoenician rtl .. ... i. ’ v Ci. ■ • m' rianfi (An'nlicijraphy, p. 19o),by Daniel Wilson (New AUant-is), and in the Encyclopaedia ed . all -' Tin t<> rest on thi* paper of Johan Podolyn. H. F. Walker (The Azores, , ,. ther, j i,,,; the slightest corroborative tradiliou among the inhabitants of Corvo, and discredits the whole *tory. GafTorel « . I us to think that the Phoenicians had even reached America, but this will not r f .. it. vtu i ,ny m <> than those more recent attempts to show that the Phoenicians had reached Central t rth of Au-f.lia and Fluster Maud in the Pacific (GalFarel, Compte Rendu da 1” Conyrds lies N in i, 1-7-N p. 93; Gaflhrel, Etude sur les rapports de FAmfirique et de l’Aucien Continent avaut C. • ; - . i s< i, p. im ; T. C. Johnston, Did the Phoenicians discover America? Oeogr. Soc. California, 1892). * i ), « . . 1 1 . . v n ither th Scilly Islands or the islands in Vigo Bay, on the north-west coast of Spurn (see C I. Ellon, Origin* of English History, ed. 2, London, 1890). SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 5 East the Phoenicians were accustomed to round the southern part of Arabia into the Persian Gulf, and to sail southwards along the eastern coasts of Africa, attracted doubtless by the commerce in pearls.1 Phoenician names and remains indicate their presence in these regions. It cannot be shown with certainty that they circumnavigated Africa,' but it is known that, in the remotest periods of history, they executed voyages over the ocean which might rival some of those of the fifteenth century. (See Plate J.) The same spirit of intrepid commercial enterprise animated the Carthaginians, who ^he r*«Ti.A- continued the traditions of their ancestors, the Tyrians; but, as in the case of the ' Phoenicians, all their historical monuments have been destroyed. However, a Greek translation of the Periplus of the Carthaginian admiral, Hanno, has been preserved. The date of this voyage, which added much to the knowledge of the Atlantic, cannot be definitely fixed. Pliny says that at the most flourishing period of Punic affairs, “Hanno Han.-.o, ,60 B.1 . received the order to make the circuit of Africa.” 4 This period corresponds to the sixth century before our era. The whole of that century was marked by a great intel- lectual expansion among all the peoples of the Mediterranean, and in that movement geography played a considerable part. Hanno is said to have conducted a fleet, composed of sixty vessels, 'each carrying five hundred men and women, along the western coast of Africa towards the Equator. This colonising enterprise showed, for the first time, the extension of the Atlantic towards the south. Like almost all early voyages, this one was undertaken in the interests of commerce, and to extend the dominion of the nation which sent it forth. In these ancient expeditions we do not find a trace of the true voyager, imbued with the spirit of observation and a desire to discover new facts in nature. While Hanno explored the western coasts of Africa, another Carthaginian sailor, Himilco, undertook a voyage of discovery in that part of the ocean situated to the north- Hi.un.c- west of Europe. An account of this voyage was extant in the fourth century of our era. and its main features have been preserved by the poet Festus Avienus. Beyond the Pillars of Hercules, to the west of Europe, the ocean is represented as stretching towards the horizon without limit ; a favourable wind never blows, a breath from heaven never fills the sails, the air is enveloped in a mantle of mist, a thick fog covers the sea 1 The Ophir of Solomon has been supposed to be situated in the south of Arabia, in India, and in the Ray of Sofala on the east coast of Africa. Each of these identifications has been supported by learned critics. In addition to these three principal views, others with more imagination have endeavoured to show that Ophir vu situated in Malacca, in Brazil, or in Peru (see Dr K. von Baer, Wo ist das Salomonische Ophir zu suchen ? Hi,- msch- Fragen St Petersburg , 1873 ; T. C. Johnston, Did the Phoenicians discover America ? Geog. Soc. California , 1892). 2 Herodotus, IV. 42. The Periplus of Necho has been the subject of much controversy. Hecho or Xeco, son Psammeticus, who reigned from 610 to 594 b.c., on abandoning the canal he had begun to cut between the Xile i the Arabian Gulf, sent an expedition down the Bed Sea, which, in the third year, returned by the Pillars of Hercules. The expedition is said to have been manned by Phoenicians. Herodotus states a circumstance which, he says, “ I . my part do not believe, but perhaps others may,” viz., that, while sailing round Africa, the navigators had be sun the right hand. If this means that their shadows were thrown to the south in rounding Africa, as seems to be t in- case, it supports the view that the circumnavigation really took place (see Id. Berger, Geschichte der xvisser - h.-.rrli Erdkunde der Griechen, p. 39). 3 Geogr. Gr. Min., ed. C. Muller, vol. i. p. 14. 4 Pliny, Hist. Hat.., v. 1. Chaka'-tkk ok TU* PlKISIOUXi*. 6 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. r ill tunc.-, and -ombre vapours there obscure the light of day.1 Himilco was not : tiiiue his route through this gloom, across this muddy ocean covered with - a-wvrd and inhabited by marine monsters. It was through such sombre colours that tin an< ients viewed the external sea to the west and beyond the coasts of Germany and Britain, to which they gave the names of Mare cronhm, pigrum, concretum , mortuum. 1 ■ Theophrastus - and in a compilation written about the middle of the third century before ( i.ri-t . i heii aiv other references to Carthaginian discoveries, which seem to indicate ’ll • t h< \ wen acquainted with the weed of the Sargasso Sea. The mention of sea- i:k 'ii-tiTs plunging among the sea-weeds in which the vessels were becalmed shows that • . ' we eds could not have been attached to the shore or to shallows, and is in favour of the view that the Carthaginians had reached the 'Sargasso Sea, T . rnlge from the few details that have been transmitted to us by classical writers, tli.- know h-d m ol the ocean possessed bj^ Phoenicians and Carthaginians was of an essen- tially i .radical kind. In this phase of maritime exploration, the cruises and mercantile - v ; - 1 :ti .11- K-complished little more than an extension of knowledge with regard to the extent and limits of the different seas, the most elementary part of the science. What we know of the Carthaginians has been transmitted through the Romans, v 1 'ii information regarding the Phoenicians of the eastern basin of the Mediterranean i <1 riv< d from tie Greeks. The Greeks profited by the. discoveries of the Phoenicians .,ii ■ vrntuallv drove them from the sea, of which they had so long been the masters. T I.--,' bellicos' Phoenicians, when they encountered their rivals, sought new routes for tii- ii maritime commerce, which for centuries they had carefully concealed, thus preserv- :.g to them .-Ives the monopoly of the rare products for which they went in search to gr> 1 di g me- s across the sea, such as amber, tin, silver, gold dust, pearls, and aromatics. T precautions taken by these peoples to hide their oceanic routes tended not a to "Pscure the notions concerning the sea among the ancients. The Phcemcians 0 ! ' i’ ’ h /ini "is excited the imaginations of their rivals, when they attempted to ; !!"■■•. hem, by . xnggerating the dangerous adventures of their distant voyages. Thus < ■ g i 1 ■ - a . •. riflins of the Pontus Euxinus, Scylla and Charybdis, the gelatinous - ■ f 1 1; - i -i t ' and other fables. Had the historical records of the Phoenicians been 1 r v 1, uv should certainly have found in them more than the merest outlines of the h h dgi <>f the s. a- a result of their voyages. These sagacious and experienced sailors c ' hi'-- a cumulated many important facts relating to the morphology of the ocean. \ | ’hat initiated such great enterprises and accomplished such extensive explora- t a:. .. have i -cen composed solely of clever navigators, eager merchants, and bold • ' j-l'-r r-. T !ior*- mu t have been in their midst men of learning who speculated fling tie origin of the phenomena of the ocean. We know little or nothing of 1 R. 1 AvienuB, Oru nmritimn, vv. 115 130, 406-415. ’ It' 1 I’lnnt., iv. 6, 7. * Mirab. Auscull., p. 136. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 7 their progress in astronomy. Perhaps they also kept this knowledge secret, for there are many indications that they were possessed of many of its practical applications to the art of navigation. At the dawn of history, and before all the other peoples of antiquity, we find them sailing over the open sea without a compass or coast to guide them. They even navigated the open ocean at night. The Phoenicians did this before the time of Homer, while the Greeks and Romans, for a long time after that period, never lost sight of the coasts, and sailed only during the day.1 The notions with reference to the sea inherited by the Greeks from the Phoenicians The Oj. > k>. appear to have been extremely vague, even regarding the Mediterranean, which must have been the best known to them. Greek philosophers and navigators first directed attention to the scientific problems of the ocean, and aided in solving them by their progress in branches of knowledge connected with physical geography. Their influence was profound, and traces of the oceanographical ideas of the Greeks survived for centuries in literature. The Greeks, so admirably endowed in most respects, had not a sufficient number of accurate observations to form a solid basis for induction ; they did not possess the rigorous methods of modern science, which do not admit of deductions beyond tne range of the observations. Their theoretical conceptions cannot, however, be passed over, any more than the ancient Greek myths relative to the earliest voyages of their race. “ Popular myths,” says Humboldt, “ mixed with history and geography, do not altogether belong to the ideal world. If vagueness be one of their distinctive traits, if the symbols which cover the reality be wrapped in a veil more or less thick, the myths closely associated with them show, nevertheless, the first dawn of cosmography. The statements of primitive history and geography are not entirely ingenious fictions ; the opinions which have been formed about the actual world are reflected in them.”2 The first step in the geographical history of the Greeks is the legendary voyage of Mythical the Argonauts, although this myth gives no certain facts regarding the physical geography Ap'‘.^ET,^ of the sea. The poetical elaboration of the story took place, according to Grote, between 600 and 500 years before the Christian era. If the voyage has any foundation in fact, it was probably as much a Phoenician as a Greek adventure in search of gold.3 All that can be said with reference to the poetical accounts of the wars of Troy is that, at the Wars of Tro' period immortalised by the genius of Homer, the Greeks were so familiar with navigation as to be able to transport an army across the iEgean Sea as far as the Hellespont.4 1 The Phoenicians steered by the Pole star, which, from this circumstance, was named by the Greeks the Ph nician star (Enc. Brit., art. “Phoenicia’'). The Greeks, it is said, steered by the Great Bear (Bunbury, op cit., vol i. p. 34). 2 Humboldt, op. cit., tom. i. p. 112. 3 The name argo is possibly of Phoenician origin (the Semetic word circle, long), having reference to the “ long s', ;ps ” or fighting ships as distinguished from the round or cargo shifs. The argo may have been the first long ship bui't by the Greeks. The voyage of Argo is readily enough understood as the attempt of a people, ignorant of geography and physics, to combine in one narrative the Phoenician voyages in every quarter of the then known world, (pee John Kenrick, History and Antiquities of Phoenicia, p. 92, London, 1855). Alexandrian critics confused the story by ; mnslVr. the wanderings of Ulysses to the Outer Ocean, while retaining the idea of this ocean such as it was known to : 4 Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 17. THE VOYAGE OP H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 8 V>t withstanding the m\ thical and poetical elements in Homer, there are some details \ ; iv, Hi. g We find in his works the conception held by the Greeks of his time , m nu land : nd sea. The earth is represented as a large disc with slightly elevated ; :h n m, an immense external river with rapid currents and unknown boundaries. 1 1 n r does not admit that the ocean was a sea ; the expression in his verses con- w\.' tl idea < 1 1 a river. In the middle of the disc surrounded by the ocean is placed t .1 . Sea and its archipelagoes. All springs, streams, rivers, seas, and indeed all \ > on tin earth were the offspring of the ocean, but the poet gives no indication i ; n ; irded t he internal sea as being in communication with the great ocean river. I; i- d mbtful whether, at this period, the Greeks had even heard, through the 1' < i 1 1 :ans, of the Erythraean Sea or of the external sea to the westward of the Pillars of Hercules, and they themselves had certainly never navigated these waters. It I- - r "lv necessary to add that they were absolutely ignorant of the northern and southern oceanic regions. In tin i o inogr.iphical conception of Homer the external borders of the ocean river . ! a - a -up] mt to the transparent celestial vault. Everything seems to indicate that di. inceptions of tin world were derived by the Greeks from oriental sources, and tl i* It us, clothed by their poets in harmonious and mythical form, were perpetuated m -v tlm people down to the time of Hecatoeus. The poems of Homer abound in 1: h. descriptions of the sea ; from the sea the poet copiously borrows his com- j • i : : i.- and metaphors. This shows that the Greeks were familiar with the varied m • . f ! lie s- a, and how much its grand phenomena struck their imaginations. It is i! ■ ..iv- :!. poetic element which fixes their attention. Homer gives not a single ■_ plm .il detail relative to the ;ea. He had not even a special name for the ocean, in\ ni'ji" than the Greeks and the Piomans during succeeding centuries had for the Mediterranean. (See Plate I.) n tin time of Homer there are indications that sailors guided their ships, . lid.- _■ th night, b) observing the constellations,1 and, also, that the poet possessed very d> tm'‘ notions regarding winds favourable to navigation; thus when he speaks of 1 — 1 Hiding at Thrinakia, where he was detained for a month by contrary winds, iloin.T designates all the winds in a clear and characteristic manner. The whirlpools of th . :■ real .-.-a- piny a great idle in the heroic expeditions — viz., those about Scylla and < v I : < ert.iin that the perils of those formidable points have been exaggerated f i r 1 1 • ■ - of the poets. Yet the foundation of these, legends reposes upon ?’.• ] ' ■ 'menu pr -ented by the sen in the neighbourhood of the Strait of Messina, h and currents from two sens meet in a narrow channel.2 The ancient * Od/Mcjr, v. 277. Tli ii 1 !' ' i, of these d angers (iv. 24). Admiral Smyth (Mediterranean, pp. 178-182) • ‘hr ' - n n ivu-.itir,.* tin- trail an -ueh iw to give rise to tlie dangerous reputation ascribed to thra bj the anrivnt* (tec Lunhury. op. cii., voL i p. 61). SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 9 geographers knew all the difficulties of this passage, and correctly brought them into connection with the whirlpools of Homer.1 The poet himself had no definite idea of their situation ; he placed them in the far west, like the islands of iEolus and Circe. Hesiod touches od questions relating to the ocean only in an incidental manner ; Hesiod. his general notions on land and sea resemble those of Homer. With Hesiod, the ocean stream is a perfect river.2 Hesiod gives a catalogue of rivers flowing from the ocean and Tethys ; it appears from several passages that land exists on the other side of the ocean, and that the extreme limit of the world is not the oceanic stream. Thus, with him, the Hesperides are in a land beyond the ocean.3 The giant Geryones lived in the island of Erythea, across the ocean.1 “ The islands of the blest ” are surrounded by the eddies of the sea. The Greeks were not long in abandoning the Homeric idea as to the ocean limit of the world. We may even see in these passages of Hesiod the first traces of some ancient myths, the most celebrated being that of Atlantis, which supposed the existence of inhabited regions beyond the confines of the land bordered by the ocean stream. Towards the end of the eighth century before our era, the Greeks commenced to Eighth Century employ larger ships in navigation, which permitted them to undertake more distant1' voyages with less danger ; this had a beneficial effect on the progress of oceanography.5 It was at this period that the range of geographical knowledge was extended by the establishment of Doric and Ionic colonies on the coasts of Southern Italy and Sicily. Soon afterwards colonists from the city of Miletus penetrated northward to the Pontus Euxinus. At the same time, some wandering pirates reached the delta of the Nile, and, in reward for services rendered by them to the king, commercial relations were established between the Greeks and the kingdom of Psammetieus, Egypt having, up to that date, been closed to all foreigners, as rigidly as were China and Japan down to a recent period. A few years after the opening up of Egypt, the oracle of Delphi ordered the inhabi- Seventh Centub tants of the island of Thera to go forth and found a colony on the Libyan coasts. It is said that such was the ignorance of these islanders, at that period, of all that lay beyond the horizon of their habitual voyages, that no person could be found among them who knew where Libya was to which they were required to send colonists ; the expedition was, however, organised a little later, and resulted in the foundation of Cyrene about 631 b.c. It happened about the same time that Colseus, the commander of a ship of Samos, was carried by east winds far to the west. After passing the coasts of Sicily, he traversed the 1 Strabo, i. 2, 36. 2 TeA^Ei/r os TroTa.fj.ciio, referring very probably to its circular course, flowing round, and encompassing all things (Hesiod, Theog., vv. 242, 959.). 3 Hesiod, ibid.., vv. 215, 216. 4 Hesiod, ibid., vv. 287-294. For the whole passage, see Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 86. 5 Thucydides, i. 13. According to this author the Corinthians were the first to build triremes ; the Samians learnt the use of them from the Corinthians as early as 700 B.c. (see Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 108). (summary op results chall. exp. — 1894.) 2 10 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Sixth Century RC. Ionian School. ITecatxus. Straits of Gades, and, landing at Tartessus, brought home from tlicnce an invaluable cargo. This great Tyrian establishment, as well as the whole western portion of the Mediter- ..nean. had. according to Herodotus, up to that time remained wholly unknown to the Greeks.' Che Phocseans made frequent voyages to the Western Mediterranean towards die close of the seventh century, and in GOO b.c. the city of Massilia was founded by a colony from Phocasa.2 Earl)r in the sixth century b.c. the Greeks commenced to form new views with regard to the stream of ocean, and the Cimmerian darkness of the ancient poets. The old legends of the Homeric age were still reproduced at times among the poets of the sixth nd fifth centuries b.c., for example, by iEsehylus and Pindar, but they are archaic vmlnisccnces, assuredly not confounded with the reality. The navigation of the Straits >f Gibraltar was well known to be both dangerous and difficult; this is expressed by an adage found in Pindar3: — “Neither wise man nor fool gets beyond the Pillars of Hercules.” Let us now cast a glance at the conceptions held by the philosophers of the sixth and seventh centuries b.c., and their speculations concerning the physical structure of the world and the phenomena of the sea. Thales of Miletus,4 chief of the Ionian school, and recog- nised as the founder of physical science among the Greeks, is distinctly stated by Plutarch5 to have been acquainted with the spherical form of the earth. This is evidently an error, for Aristotle represents him as teaching that the earth was supported on water, upon which it floated like a log or ship ; earthquakes were said to have been caused by the agitation of the water. The speculations of his followers were even more singular than those of the master. Thus, Anaximander,6 who is credited with the invention of the gnomon, md who was the first to represent the surface of the globe on a map, is said to have held that the earth wa3 of cylindrical form, the inhabited part being the upper end of the cylinder.7 Anaximenes,8 a successor of Anaximander; held that the earth was of rr. gular, quadrangular form — a flat trapezium which was supported by the air beneath it as a consequence of its pressing down on it like the lid of a vase.9 IIecata3us of Mih-tus,10 the most celebrated geographer of the Ionian school, constructed a new map of the world, and surveyed the geographical notions of the Greeks towards the end of the -ixth century b.c. He gives some indications of the morphology of the sea, but, like all his predecessors, he admits the existence of the stream of ocean, and considers the 1 Herodotus, iv. 152. T! l’)i " > a - employed penteconters in these voyages instead of the “ round ships,” a name applied to ordinary n - r- h.-in • ves • Is, p< sibly in view of hostile encounters with the Phoenicians (see H. Berger, Gesckichte der Wissen- •. h.Jtl • ’ Knlkundc der Griechen, p. 17 ; Vivien de St. Martin, Ilistoire de la Geographic, Paris, 1873, p. 73. * Olytnp., iii. 80. 4 Flourished in the first half of the sixth century B.c. * Plutarch, Plac. Phil., iii. 10. 8 610 to 547 B.C. " Plutarch, Plac. PhiL, iii. 10. 8 Flourished in the latter half of the sixth century B.c. * Aristotle, De Coelo, ii. 13, see. 10 ; Plutarch, Plac. Phil., iii. 10. ** Flourished in the sixth century B.C. Summary of Results Plate 1 Th.e 'Voyage of H.M.S “ClialLeiiger” Die Xdiriburgii Geogfruyliical Ini VOYAGE OF THE ARGONAUTS according to THE TRADITIONS OF THE ANCIENTS THE WORLD according' to H EC AT/£ U S B.C. 500 . Trade of the Argo 1t> Cnidus Return Voyage of the Argonauts a/uu>r ding tjo Orpheus . nun- - Pi rub IT ,.»«■»« Apollo nine THE WORLD according to HOMER J3.C.100O tales A.~bi i Sippomolgi J»‘*o luck!*. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 11 Caspian to be in communication with the external sea. The Nile takes its source in the same external ocean. It is not necessary to dwell on other cosmographical conceptions of the Ionian school ; the spherical form of the earth, which must be regarded as the fundamental principle of all scientific geography, was unknown to them. (See Plate I.) Pythagoras1 and his followers, however, regarded the earth as a sphere,2 not from a Pythagorea.v study of facts but rather from speculative considerations ; they gave the earth a spherical ScH00ri- shape, because they held that form to be the most perfect. It is asserted by some writers that Pythagoras taught to his chosen disciples the true doctrine that the sun occupies the centre of the solar system, and that the earth is only one of the planets revolving around it ; and it is further affirmed that this knowledge was acquired from the Egyptians and Chaldeans.3 In the fifth century b.c. there appeared one of the most remarkable writers of Fifth Century antiquity, Herodotus,4 who abandoned speculative theories and gave his attention to the h’ei-odotus observation of facts. He may be considered the founder of the science of physical geography, Hecatseus of Miletus being, to some extent, his precursor ; for, in addition to the cosmographical ideas wTe have mentioned above, Hecatseus gives much information concerning the coast tows of the Western Mediterranean. Herodotus had relative!) little knowledge of the western regions and seas, while, on the other hand, he gives copious information about the east and north. He had learnt from the Greek merchants of the Pontus Euxinus that, contrary to the view of Hecatseus, the Caspian was entirely isolated from the ocean, and he knewr its form and extent. Herodotus gives to the Palus Mseotis 5 an extent nearly equal to the Euxinus, although the latter is at least six times greater. Commentators and geographers, founding upon this estimate of the Greek historian, have concluded that great physical changes have taken place in the region of the Sea of Azov in recent times. Scylax, a century after Herodotus, estimated Lake Maeotis at one-half of that of the Euxinus.6 Down even to the time of Ptolemy the ancients gave too great dimensions to this little sea. (See Plate II.) It is not without interest to note that the estimates of the Pontus Euxinus are made in Herodotus by means of tire dpyvid ,7 corresponding to the fathom ( brcisse , fciden), Fathoms l?ed which is always employed by sailors as a measure of depth. “ In a long day,” he says, -j “a ship usually accomplishes about 70,000 fathoms, and about 60,000 in the night. This employment of the word opymd indicates distinctly that this was not only a bathy- metrical measure, but also a nautical measure of length, the place of which has been taken by the modern knot of navigation. Herodotus himself translates fathoms into stadia.8 The practical spirit of Herodotus concerned itself only with facts, and he dealt 1 Flourished in the sixth century b.c. - Whewell, Hist, of Ind. Sci., ed. 3, vol. i. p. 115, London, 1S57. 3 Harkness, On the Magnitude of the Solar System, Nature, voi. I. p. 532. 4 484 to 408 B.c. 5 Sea of Azov. 6 Scylax, Periplus, 69. 7 The length of the outstretched arms. 8 100 op yviai, or fathoms, 600 feet = a cable’s length = 1 stadium (see Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. pp. 176 and 209). 12 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. SoClUTKa A5D Plato Mrni or iTum , i, a.lly U- \\ > at the idea of the philosophers and poets, that the earth was surrounded , : , \ Hi. ocean; h himself went too far in the opposite direction, by affirm- tl.at 'hr ocean did not extend to the north of Europe and Asia. He says: — i : frain from laughing a little at all those who undertake to describe the land without any facts to guide them, for example, who represent the ii ’ it the entire world in its course, who make it round as if drawn with ,i | i rf . nmp isses.”1 He rejects the notion that the earth has the form of a disc, and r . •!. (M.e n is a river; he combats this theory everywhere. No person, he argues, .1 to say whether Europe was bounded by the sea to the north and east, but 11 known that it was bathed by the Atlantic to the west as Asia was by the m s to the south. Departing from this prudent reserve, he states that there . manner of doubt that Africa is a peninsula attached to the continent by the ,-thmus of Suez, and surrounded at the south by the ocean. He evidently accepts v w 'tin true one, because he believed what had been affirmed with reference t< -is ol Necho around the continent of Africa.2 With Herodotus, then, the ; nd tin Erythraean Sea were one ocean, which must be regarded as one of ■ imp' rtant advances in a knowledge of the ocean basins. This is not the only uh! it ion Thl- Greek writer has made to our notions of physical geography. He points it i he i -j ilar tide in the Persian Gulf, a phenomenon which did not fail to strike the d- unaccustomed as they were to any flux or reflux of the sea on their own coasts. II ..!-■• discusses the formation of alluvium at the entrance of the Nile, and the size and configuration of the three continents. In nr -ingle passage3 Herodotus employs the word Atlantic to designate the sea to t1 v -• !n • ir appears evident from the incidental manner in which the word is used, ' t! i. iv. . ■ re met with for the first time, must have been well known at the period. < Pi "tin r hand, we do not find in his writings a special name for the Mediterranean.4 I • -i of Socrates and Plato0 concerning the habitable world do not touch directly • oui a’ljeei, ' \rept with reference to the myth of Atlantis, concerning which it is c r) t" '.ay few words, as this conception has not been without influence on intimately connected with oceanography. In this mythical story, Plato7 supposes : it extent of land situated in the external sea to have disappeared in one day and ■ :. beneath tl : waters of the ocean. Since that time, he adds, the Atlantic Sea ■d to be navigable, its waters having become muddy and charged with clay '!• r.\' d fr in the engulfed land. Everything appears to show that, according to the i "J Plato, this narration was a pure fiction; yet in succeeding centuries many a ' ; ' ■ m ni, id'- to interpret this story by reference to geological phenomena, 1 Herodotus, ir. 36. 1 Hcrwlotu*, i. 30S. * Born About 469 u.c * Born 429 u.c. 2 Herodotus, iv. 42 (see page 4 ante). 4 See Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 221, note. 7 Plato, Timaius, c. B. 6 ; Critias, c. 3. 8. SUMMARY" OF RESULTS. 13 the theatre of which has been placed in the Atlantic.1 The myth of Plato was in all probability suggested by the reports concerning the external sea which reached the early Greeks through the Phoenicians, who represented the Atlantic as shallow, muddy, and encumbered with seawveed.2 During the fifteenth century of our era, it was even supposed that in the celebrated myth of Atlantis, Plato described America ; but there is nothing in Plato’s myth to suggest a reference to the New World. Those who believe in the transformation of true oceanic areas into continental areas, and vice versa, in recent geological times, have supported their views by a reference to the Atlantis myth.3 While this transformation has undoubtedly taken place in coast regions and shallow seas, there is little, if any, evidence of such changes in continental and oceanic areas properly so called. The voyage of Scylax of Caryanda,4 down the Indus and to the Persian Gulf, must Fourth Century be referred to the early part of the fifth century, but the Periplus of the Mediterranean | ^ which bears his name belongs probably to the first half of the fourth century b.c.5 Caryanda. This Periplus of Scylax shows that the Greeks, at that time, had little knowledge of the sea which bathes the wTest of Europe. The remarks are limited to saying : — “ Beyond the1 Pillars of Hercules there are many Carthaginian commercial stations, much muddy water, high tides, and open seas.” 6 The writer was the first to give us a detailed account of the coasts of the Adriatic ; we are also indebted to him for descriptions of the Pontus Euxinus. At the end of the Periplus there is an enumeration of the principal islands known in the Mediterranean, where twenty of them are arranged in the order of their size. In this list the Balearic Islands are not mentioned ; a fact which shows how incomplete was the knowledge possessed by the Greeks of this period, regarding even the Mediterranean — the sea best known to them.' Although the Greeks must be regarded as the founders of scientific geography, they are not known before the fourth century to have undertaken oceanic voyages of discovery, which are, in a way, the prelude of oceanographical researches. According to Herodotus,8 the Phocseans were the first Greeks to trade in the Adriatic, to become The Piiocjl. w, acquainted with the Tyrrhenian Sea, and to venture on the waters of the Atlantic. The Phocasan colonists of Massilia (Marseilles) were the first to undertake naval enterprises on an extensive scale. In the fourth century before our era they sent an expedition to the North Sea, under the direction of the illustrious astronomer and mathematician, Pytheas,9 Pythka?. 1 Quatre lettres sur le Mexique, par l’Abbe Brasseur ; Donnelly, Atlantis, London, 1886 ; Daniel Wilson, The Lost Atlantis, Edinburgh, 1892. 2 See ante, p. 6. 3 The idea of Atlantis was developed in ancient times by Theopompus, contemporary and pupil of Ephorus ; his geographical knowledge was very imperfect (see Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 384.) * Flourished at the end of the sixth century B.c. 6 Niebuhr fixes the date at 360-348 B.c. 6 Scylax, Periplus, 1. 7 See Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 394, and note B, p. 406. 8 Herodotus, i. 163 (see p. 10, ante). 8 His date is uncertain ; he probably lived in the time of Alexander the Great, in the second half of the fourth century . 14 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Yoruii or n» Rmtaix. • tin: di?t. nt |> riod, had determined the latitude of Massilia with such exactitude, tli t tw, ntv c< uturics afterwards Gassendi found it correct to within a few seconds. It is j.mbiihlf that the knowledge which Pytheas possessed in astronomy recommended him t.» hi> fellow-citizens as the chief of this expedition, the object of which was to n di~ >\ the sources of the riches brought from distant parts by the Phoenicians and ( ni ii- Not only did Pytheas succeed in his mission, but his cruises yielded much new information concerning the ocean. A second expedition was sent to explore the o,.;ists of Africa under another scientific man, Euthymenes. The records of this v.v _ are almost wholly lost, but it was reported that Euthymenes reached a river when crocodiles and hippopotami were seen in great numbers.1 Pm he;.- sailed round Spain and France to Britain. He appears to have traced out .. cm -iderable part of the east coast of Britain and to have visited the German coast on the other side of the North Sea. He brought home accounts of the land, six days’ sail d Ib ii di . named Thule, a name which he first introduced into ancient geography. il( -e d t .;t the sea beyond Thule became thick and sluggish, like neither land nor '(•a. but resembling the substance of the jelly-fish, called Pulmo marinus, which he had hini' !f eii ; in this description we have the first hint as to the conditions prevailing in \ retie Si .vs.J He is said to have recorded as a fact that the length of the day at Thule v e twenty-four hours at the summer solstice, from which he conceived it as lying mi 1 r t h» \r< tic circle, or parallel of 6G^° N. The Phocsean explorer like wise brought In I. i e i *i >i n 1 1 ' of the amber coasts, but it does not appear that these accounts, or those * Thule, ri fed on personal observation, or justify us in following those authors v ho .-xt nd the journey of Pytheas to the coasts of Lapland and the Baltic.3 Of tin two works which Pytheas wrote, his first, a description of the ocean, has not b"nn jiii served ; it contained his observations on the north-western countries and on the n v a Tim 'ccond, which bears the title of Periodus or Periplus, contains his voyage in t ? i * ■ amber e. .asts of the Baltic, and has been partially preserved in Pliny, Strabo, and P 'lybiu-. Ancient writers do not appear to have been altogether just in their 'mi ti -.t the L i mod Massilian. Many of his facts were regarded as being deficient in * i * • 1 1 - : i !u arne was said of the observations of Herodotus and Marco Polo, but at ’ • 1 -at da\ he critic has vindicated these observers. There is no doubt that before t!w ? m.w of Pythea- the chart of the seas to the west of Europe was almost a blank, and >* -i 'ii to tin* time of Strabo it retained the form given it by Pytheas. He was the * * .MVi-stigator of the Atlantic, and by the extent of his observations, as well as by the - ‘ of kb researches, the voyages of Pytheas may be considered as true scientific * Athene mi, ii. 87. ' * . ii.; lthyn, Celtic Britain, London, 1882 ; Markham, Getigr. Jour., vol. i. p. ’13, 1 03. SUMMARY" OF RESULTS. 15 cruises in a part of tlie ocean which, after him, was penetrated by no navigator for four centuries.1 The high tides in the estuaries of Britain are said to have made a profound impression upon Pytheas, and to have first suggested to him a theory of the tides. However this may be, Pytheas undoubtedly gave the Greeks a true notion of the tides in attributing them, two thousand years before Newton, to the influence of the moon.2 3 To Aristotle, who was a. contemporary of Pytheas, we are indebted for many Aristotlk important additions to oceanography ; an elevated intelligence, like that of the Stagyrite, must necessarily have been attracted to the study of the ocean, in the capacity both of naturalist and of thinker. That the sea was the object of his meditations and researches, is indicated by a legend as to the manner of his death ; it is reported that, despairing of ever being able to find the interpretation of the movements of the waters of the Strait of Euripus, he threw himself into the whirlpool. The specu- lative philosopher often appears beneath his observations, and his works abound in judicious views concerning the phenomena of the sea, bearing at once the stamp of remarkable sagacity and of an earnest and investigating mind. His doctrines relating to the ocean had so much influence that his ideas upon the subject were reproduced among the Romans and down to the close of the Middle Ages. Aristotle’s observations are scattered through his works on Natural History and His General Physics, and the second book of his Meteorology commences with what may be called a CosIioorapiiy treatise on oceanography. He there deals, in particular, with the relations of land and sea. He regards the earth as a sphere, placed in the centre of the universe, round which other celestial bodies revolve. He establishes its spherical form by the fact that all things gravitate towards the centre, and by reference to the shadow of the earth during eclipses.4 He regards the habitable world as being confined to the temperate zone ; all beyond the tropic to the south is uninhabitable from heat, while the land below the Great Bear is uninhabitable from cold. He adds that there must be in the southern hemisphere a temperate zone corresponding to the northern one, but does not say that it is inhabited. He ridicules the idea that the inhabited world is circular — a notion which appears to have been prevalent in his day as well as in the time of Herodotus. Humboldt believes that the following passage must have had much influence in leading up to the discoveries of Columbus : — “ It appears,” says Aristotle, “those are not 1 St. Martin, op. cit., pp. 101-109 ; Bunbury, Ency. Brit., art. “ Pytheas.” 2 Plutarch, Plac. Phil., iii. 17. Tiinaeus, who died about 265 B.c., and who contributed much to the extension f geographical knowledge of the western parts of Europe, was far from giving such an interpretation. He stated th.V the flux and reflux of the ocean were due to the rising of the great rivers which discharged themselves irom the mountains of Gaul. Their risings caused the water of the sea to retire, and when the rivers were no more swollen the reflux occurred (Tinueus, Frag., 36 ; Plutarch, Plac. Phil.). 3 384 to 322 B.c. 4 In these cosmic views Aristotle followed those of the astronomer, Eudoxus oi Cnidus, who lived a generation, before him. His Views os the Distribution of Land and Water. BaTUVMKTIUCAL Data. Makjnk Clkkjsntb in Brack Ska AND iftitlX. 10 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. ><> very far wrong who suppose the region about the Pillars of Hercules and that about India to be contiguous, and that there is but one sea (in the part opposite to the ini ib ted world), and they point by way of proof to the elephants, these animals being found in both regions, though at the extremes of the earth, this fact showing that the extremes are really near each other.”1 Many quotations might be given to shew what correct ideas Aristotle held con- ■ ernr g the general configuration of the world, and the horizontal extension of continents and seas. The habitable world is divided into islands and continents ; our world itself is but an island surrounded by a sea called the Atlantic. In a more restricted sense the Atlantic is only a part of the external sea which bathes the western confines of habitable land, the other parts of the environing sea having then special appellations ; to the north the Boreal or Cronian, to the east and south the Southern or Erythraean. The surrounding ocean sends arms into the land, forming special and peculiar seas. At the south, the Indian Gulf, the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Gulf, are formed by the Trvthhean. At the west the Internal Sea (Mediterranean) penetrates from the Atlantic into the bosom of the land by the narrow passage of the Columns of Hercules. The Mediterranean itself ramifies into several seas, shut in by the diverse peninsulas which project from Europe and Asia. Of these seas the most advanced into the land is the or the sea par excellence; it has parts called whirlpools (fiaOea) so deep that the h id has never reached the bottom. With the exception of these points the depth o' the Internal Sea goes on increasing towards the west. The Pontus is deeper than i ■ Lake Mseotis, the iEgean deeper than the Pontus, the Tyrrhenian and Sardinian Seas deeper than all the others.2 These bathymetrical data, being the first found in the writings of antiquity, have much interest notwithstanding their want of exactness. Before Aristotle, navigators must necessarily have possessed a knowledge of depths, at least at certain determinate points, but Aristotle was the first, apparently, to generalise th se bati metrical notions of the internal seas of Europe. A illustrating the slow movements and changes which continents and seas undergo, An-totle remark' in his Meteorology that the Sea of Azov (Palus Mseotis) was being filled up. and that it would ultimately become land.8 He mentions the currents which flow from th >.-a of Azov into the Black Sea, and from the Black Sea into the iEgean, and attributes the cause of these movements to the inequalities of depth in these seas. It was especially t<> t ! io seas in the neighbourhood of Greece that he directed his attention; he had no new vi- w- in regard to the great external ocean, which he stated, in accordance with the idi > generally admitted in his time, to be muddy and little agitated by winds ( airvoa ).4 * Aristotle, Dc Oi l, ii. 15 ; Berger, op. tit., p. 142. 1 Aj e lie, Meteorologioi, ii. 12-14 ; Berger, op. tit., p. iii. 3 Aristotle, Meteorologies, i. 14, sec. 29. Bunbury (op. tit., voL i. p. 398) says it is remarkable that no other notice of the ocean or its tides is to be found I orologica : indeed, the very name of the ocean only occurs in ODe passage in this treatise in reference to the opinions of “the ancient- " concerning it (Meteor., i. 9, sec. 6). The "Voyag'e of H.KS “Challenger" Summary of Results Plate 2 THE WORLD according to HERODOTUS B.C. 450 THE WORLD according to D I C/EARCHUS B.C. 300 He Edinburgh Geographical Institute SUMMARY 01 RESULTS. 17 He states that the Caspian is entirely isolated.1 Herodotus, as has been stated, held the same opinion, yet, in spite of all the authority of Aristotle and his predecessor, this correct notion was abandoned from the time of Alexander to that of Ptolemy. Aristotle’s researches on marine animals were of distinct scientific value. He liis n k.m/ re- named and described, more or less minutely, one hundred and sixteen species of fishes, ; I -K 1 about twenty -four species of Crustaceans and Annelids, and some forty Molluscs -arid Radiates, making a total of one hundred and eighty species inhabiting the dEgean Sea ; and the student is still reminded of his study of the anatomy of Echinus, by the signifi- cant name of “ Aristotle’s Lantern’ applied to its masticatory apparatus. One of A ristotle’s pupils, Dicsearchus,2 adopted a useful modification in the construe- Dic/larcim" tion of charts ; he divided the known world by a longitudinal line, in the sense of our equator, along which stadia were marked. The maps of Hecatseus and Anaximander were merely representations or pictures, without any scale. Thanks to this graduation of Dicaearehus, it was possible to record in a more precise manner than formerly the various journeyings by land and sea. (See Plate II.) Theophrastus,3 another disciple of Aristotle, has preserved notices of the little known regions beyond the Pillars of Hercules. He states that the Phoenicians of'Gades, driven by east winds, had discovered after four days’ navigation, shallow banks covered by certain kinds of sea- weeds, where tunny-fish abounded, a prodigious number of which were captured. He also reports that, at a distance of several days’ voyage from the Columns, they discovered a large island, uninhabited, fertile, covered with woods, and with navigable rivers. It was partially colonised by the Carthaginians, but subsequently abandoned. This is the earliest notice of the Fortunate Islands of the west, so often referred to by ancient geographers. The island is spoken of in such a manner as to identify it with Madeira, but some authors have suggested that America is here indicated. To the time of Aristotle belongs the voyage of Nearchus,4 who conducted the fleet of Nearchus. Alexander from the mouths of the Indus to those of the Euphrates. This is often regarded as the first navigation of the Indian Ocean, the voyage of Scylax in the same seas being forgotten or disbelieved. Arrian and Pliny5 have preserved a full and authentic record of this remarkable cruise, which, however, had no great influence on commerce or civilisation, and made no special additions to our knowledge of the ocean. The Ptolemies — the successors of Alexander in Egypt — showed a remarkable solicitude Third C, for the sciences. Among the writings of the many learned men of the Alexandrian school Ej. .Ti .. ... , those of Eratosthenes,6 on geodesy, astronomy, and geography, are specially worthy of notice, from their great influence on the progress of geographical investigation. They, in particular, prepared the way for those of Hipparchus. It appears from the statements 1 A different opinion is attributed to him in the treatise De Mundo, but that work is general1}' regard; 1 as spurious. 2 326 to 296 b.c. 3 Flourished about the commencement of the third century B.c. 4 Took place in 325 to 324 B.c. 5 Pliny, Hist. Nat., vi. 23 et seq. 6 276 to 196 b.c. (summary of results chall. exp. — 1894.) 19 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Paralleu* or La mm* and Mkhidiav* nr I/Mtornro* MiBOOoen of Strabo that Eratosthenes made it one of his special objects to reform the map of the v. .rl.L ami to construct it on more scientific principles; his methods were strictly - ■ : • tic, oid lie i ay lv regarded as the father of systematic geography. Eratosthenes adopt' d tin views held by Aristotle and Euclid2 regarding the figure and position of the .•a: th, looking upon it tis a sphere placed in the centre of the universe, around tl o;l. r celestial bodies revolved every twenty-four hours, the sun and moon having independent motions of their own. For all practical purposes, then, his views ■ ditl'c great 1} from those of the modern geographer, except in the difference I t 1 1 the geocentric and heliocentric standpoints. He estimated the distance between Sycnc oid Alexandria at 5000 stadia, and regarding this as one-fiftieth of a great circle • »f the sphere, calculated the circumference of the earth to be 250,000 stadia (equivalent i " 2 .‘>00 geographical miles), a surprising approximation to the truth. From this he 1 tint on the parallel of Rhodes and the Pillars of Hercules, the circumference v.i- a built 200,000 stadia. The habitable wrorlcl he regarded as a little more than a third --I the circumference in that latitude; the interval of two- thirds he conceived to be filled up by the sea, and observes : — “ If it were not that the vast extent of the Atlantic rendered it impossible, one might even sail from the coast of Spain to that of India • dong the Mime parallel. 3 This is the first record of theoretical views on the possibility <-f circumnavigating the giobe. He divided the space occupied by the habitable world iy i in. - at intervals parallel to the equator, and he drew a meridian line at right angles t" tin— passing through Alexandria, thus introducing what we now call parallels of ■ 1 1 : i 1 . iid meridians of longitude. His map was most defective, arising chiefly from the rroiie"U- calculation of distances, for the measurement of ordinary distances was ru- t description, more especially with regard to journeys by sea. Ancient v _ .torn had no means of reckoning analogous to the modern log; distances by sea v. ■ i' r all} nothing more than the conversion of the number of days or nights occupied by the voyages into stadia. (See Plate III.). lh.it -th. ne~ belo ved that Africa was surrounded to the south by the sea, as is • v. d !.; from tl - f' . qui nt employment of the word Atlantic in reference to the Indian II md St mb. i tells us that he considered the Erythraean Sea and the Western Ocean as one and the same body of water.4 Lr.itiet I,, m- had the courage to assert that Homer wras ignorant of regions not ii ’ hatcly adj i- .-at to Greece and he gave much offence by saying that people would v. i dm over th<' real localities described in the Odyssey — the islands of iEolus, Circe, ( dyp ' »- — until they had found out the cobbler who had sewn up the bag of iEolus. hr ; linn, i aid to have made most extensive use of a treatise “Concerning • ' >wn up by Timo-thcn- a native of Rhodes, who was admiral of the Egyptian ’ ' ‘ 1, - L wi*. Hikt.iricAl Survey of the Astronomy of the Ancients, pp. 187, 188, London, 1862. 1, c p, .-. >ur . ■)> r i., v..l (i. p, 627 (compare passage from Aristotle, page 15 ante). 4 Strabo, i. 3, 13. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 19 fleet under Ptolemy Philadelphia. As that work is totally lost, it is impossible to judge of the real extent of the obligations of Eratosthenes to his predecessor ; but it is evident that such a practical guide to the mariner must have contributed materially to the more definite geographical knowledge of seas and coasts. This work of Timosthenes may be Precuj:-;oe oi the regarded as the precursor of the modern Sailing Directions issued by the British and other Hydrographic Offices. Timosthenes also introduced for the first time the arrange- ment of countries according to the winds that blew from different quarters with reference to Alexandria, that is to say, according to different points of the compass.1 Some of the conceptions of Strato of Lampsacus,2 which Eratosthenes adopted, Steato of Lamp- may here be summarised in a few words. He held that the Euxinus and Mediterranean bAr were formerly completely closed seas that stood at a much higher level and that they burst their barriers and gave rise to the Straits of the Bosphorus, the Hellespont, and Gibraltar. As proof of this theory, he cited the presence of marine shells far in the interior of Libya, as well as the deposits of salt in the same region. It is very improb- able, to say the least, that the sudden disruption adduced by Strato and Eratosthenes suffices to account for these straits, although the speculation has been revived in modern times.3 The observations with reference to marine shells have a great significance from a geological standpoint ; they constitute one important fact in the science of the earth, but the presence of these shells in the far interior of lands cannot be explained in this manner. It is not without interest to recall that Strato, to support his hypotheses, records the existence in the Strait of Gibraltar of a submarine bank uniting Europe and Africa ; it was this tongue of land which formerly joined the two continents. The presence of such a bank has been proved, but at too great a depth to make it at all probable that it was known by soundings to the ancients. The philosopher of Lampsacus and Eratosthenes knew, however, that certain parts of the Mediterranean — for instance, the sea about Sicily and Sardinia — were deeper than the rest of the basin. Hipparchus,4 the greatest astronomer of antiquity, was posterior to Eratosthenes by Second Centcrt about half a century, and, although he wrote more as an astronomer than as a geographer, [j. >r , ,.H. g his name is associated with the important reform of introducing projections in the tracing of charts and maps. He clearly conceived the idea, afterwards adopted by ^Ixp Projection - Ptolemy, of a map of the habitable world, on which every important point should be laid IXTlODl down according to latitude and longitude, determined by astronomical observations, although the construction of such a chart was, at the time, wholly impossible in practice. He drew circles of the sphere on the maps, representing the meridians by convergent curves. This new method had a great influence upon the study of the distribution of land 1 Strabo, ix. 3 ; Bunbury, op. cit., vol. i. p. 589. 2 Flourished in the third century B.c 3 See Admiral Smyth, op. cit., pp. 114—122 ; M. Dureau de la Malle, Geographic Physique de la Mer Noire, de l’lnterieur de 1’Afrique, et de la Mediterranee, Paris, 1807 ; N. Andrussow, Sur 1’Etat du Bassin de la Mer Noiia pendant l’Epoque pliocene, St. Petersburg, 1892. 4 Flourished from about 162 to 125 b.c. ; said to have been born 190 b.c. TILE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. PoLTBJUa Crate* • >v Maijat*. *J0 ind water; each new point on the globe, when correctly determined, could be placed on t' tp with great exactness. At this time the science of oceanography may be said h v Veil founded. The navigator could henceforth direct his vessel into unknown seas, could return by the same or another route, and could point out to others the course he had followed. (Sec Plate III.). Hipparchus regarded the whole habitable world as divided into eleven climates or zones of latitude, for each of which he indicated the length of the longest day. He had als<> a dim idea of connecting distant points by a kind of triangulation similar to that made use of by modern geographers. He did not admit that the Atlantic and Indian 0 :eai were connected towards the south of Africa, or that the former was united with th» sea that bathes the northern shores of Scythia.1 These views were apparently based on some observations of a Babylonian author, named Seleucus, with reference to t t h , which appeared to Hipparchus incompatible with the idea of a circumfluent and continuous ocean. The historian Polybius,2 a contemporary of Hipparchus, in like manner, did not admit it as proved that the habitable world was surrounded by the ocean.3 This .■utl: >r had more advanced ideas regarding marine sedimentation than his predecessors; h points out that in the Palus Maeotis the rivers bring down considerable quantities of sediment, and estimates the time it would take for the fluviatile alluvium, not only t - fill up the Palus Maeotis, but also the Pontus Euxinus or Black Sea,4 The ideas of Polybius, from a geological point of view, are most reasonable, but the rate of encroachment has been much slower than he supposed during the two thousand years wl i separate us from the time when he wrote. The modification in these seas has no1 been very appreciable, for Polybius reports that in his time the greater part of the S > ■ f Azov was only from 5 to 7 fathoms deep, and the same depths are marked on modern hydrographic charts. Polybius also gives a detailed evaluation of the dimensions of the Mediterranean. Its 1* : _Tih from the Strait of Gibraltar to Selcucia in Syria he gives at about 2440 miles, or 10,52" stadia, — a calculation nearer the truth than that of Eratosthenes, and short of the r d length by only 5 00 stadia — and to it he assigned a width of 3000 stadia. This was ■ o:,-'derably less than the reality, and caused him to bring the coasts of Gaul and 1 _ : much too fa” towards the south.5 Polybius had probably received some dim, t: • . 1 1 i 1 1 g tradition of the populous and fertile regions south of the Soudan, for lie states tlii* the immediate neighbourhood of the equator is much less hot than the torrid zones on either -idc, and that it was habitable — indeed, inhabited. A: "Ut this tine Crates of Mallus® is said to have constructed the first globe on which b. Atlantic Ocean i- extended t*> the south pole. A corresponding ocean is placed on 1 Strnljo, i. 1, 9. * Polrbiu*, iv. 39-4?. * 204 to 122 B.C. * See Bunbury, op. rii., vol. ii. p. 35. 3 Polybius, iii. 38. 9 Flourished about 150 n.c. The Voyage of H.M.S “ChaHeiLger” Summary of Results Plate ? THE WORLD according to ERATOSTHENES B.C. 220 THE WORLD according to H I PPARCHUS Ji* Edinburgh Geographical Tan titnle - SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 21 the other hemisphere. In the belief that only water could occur in the torrid zone, an oceanic belt ran along the equator. In the four segments thus produced four land areas were placed, only one of which was known to the ancients. Artemidorus, 1 who flourished about the end of the second century before our era, gives Artemidorus a m accounts of voyages around the Red Sea, the Black Sea, and the Mediterranean. This ;V inARCHIBES' author is said co have made much use of the writings of a predecessor, Agatharchides,2 who correctly referred the inundations of the Nile to heavy rains in Ethiopia. One passage throws some light on the navigation of this time. Agatharchides says that persons .sailing in vessels carrying cargoes could, with a favourable wind, reach Rhodes in ten days from the Palus Mseotis. Rhodes was only four days from Alexandria, and ten days’ sail up the Nile was sufficient to reach Ethiopia. A voyage of twenty-four days was thus sufficient to pass from the coldest regions of the earth to the hottest. The cruises of Eudoxus of Cyzicus3 merit a few remarks because of their character as Eudoxus of Cyzicus voyages of exploration, being in this distinguished from all others of ancient times, which were undertaken generally with the sole object of carrying on barter or extending dominion. Eudoxus, like many others, thought that the Atlantic communicated with the Erythraean Sea,4 and, after some successful voyages from Egypt to India, made several voyages from Gades with the object of finding that communication. Cruising along the dangerous coast of Africa without the aid of a compass, he was compelled to return, after repeated attempts, without accomplishing his mission. What is known of his expeditions gives few geographical indications, but Eudoxus was one of the race of discoverers wffio have, from epoch to epoch, contributed so much to the extension of geographical knowledge.5 Posidonius, who flourished in the first century before our era, was specially attracted First Century by questions of physical geography. He visited Spain in order to see the External Sea j,’. 'lDOM . with his owrn eyes, to observe the constellations, to measure the tides, and to judge for himself concerning the popular legend which related that the sun, when sinking into the Western Atlantic, made a hissing noise, as when a red-hot body is plunged into water. Strabo has preserved many scattered notices of the writings of Posidonius, and, especially, gives an analysis of his work on the ocean. Posidonius, having estimated the circumference of the globe at 180,000 stadia, and the length of the habitable world 1 See Bunbury, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 61. 2 Flourished about 116 b.c. 8 Took place between 117 and 111 b.c. ; see Lindsay, History of Merchant Shipping and Ancient Commerce, vol. i. p. 81, London, 1874. 4 Eudoxus, in his first voyage to India, took with him, as pilot, an Indian who had been picked up half-dead on a ship in the Arabian Gulf, having been driven by gales from the coasts of India. In his second voyage, Eudoxus himseb Was driven on the eastern coast of Africa, beyond Ethiopia, where he found the prow of a ship which was saio to have come from Gades ; this he brought to Egypt and exhibited in the market-place, and on this circumstance based his belief in the possibility of circumnavigating Africa. Strabo reproaches Posidonius lor believing this old wife s story (Strabo, ii. 3, 5 ; see Bunbury, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 77). 5 See St. Martin, op. cit., p. 152. In the fifth century b.c., a Persian nobleman, Sataspes, failed, like Eu . xus. ir. the attempt to round Africa from the Atlantic. P08ML\ u ut . ’ the land caused by earthquakes and volcanic outbursts taught him the modi!' at ions which the surface of the globe might undergo under the influence of these : H. even went so far as to admit that the Atlantis of Plato might not be a pure ;!. ti >n, and that an island, equal to a continent, might really sink into the depths of the ...•• in by the dislocations to which the earth’s crust is subjected.4 A < ording to Posidonius, the sea about Sardinia was the deepest of known seas; it !.. n “ measured” down to “ somewhere about ” 1000 fathoms. It would have been i iig to kuow the methods employed by the ancients in these deep soundings, but th. author gives no information on the subject.6 This may be considered the first of a d* ■up-sea sounding, and, for that reason, deserves to be noticed. Before w : met with another observation of this nature many centuries pass away; indeed, • till th' in of the celebrated Portuguese navigator, Magellan, do we find a renewal of attempts to sound the deep sea. When the Romans had extended their dominions to Egypt, they were able to acquire th.- g. ..graphical knowledge possessed by the school of Alexandria, but the genius of this • Ur: ucring people was not directed towards scientific researches. The science of . i] / was not advanced among them, as among the Greeks, by the speculations ■ : [■hi:- •- >pli<-r-, l.y the observation of natural phenomena, or by commercial relations. I* i; natural to expert that the Romans, who had carried their arms throughout n- ir \ ill th-- world known to the ancients, should have left some important documents r.l ting to the physical aspects of nature in the regions over which they had •i. i-d t h< ir sway; few Latin writers have, however, made contributions to 1 - r . : i. 3, ' Tin « en ornate of the circumference of the globe was accepted by the later Greek geographers, tad even by the astronomer Ptolemy, in toe to the more correct one of Eratosthenes. * Sue ii. 3, 4. 1 Strabo, iii. 6, 8. ^Strabo, ii. 3, 6. 1 Strabo, 13,9; «ee Banbury, op. c ii., voL ii. pp. 93-100. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 23 geography. Although the Romans extended their rule over a great extent of coast bordering on the Atlantic, they never organised any voyages of discovery into this outer sea, after the manner of the Carthaginians and Greeks. They have given no definite information concerning the coasts of Africa, and relatively little about the shores of Europe. They were essentially a warlike and practical people, with politicians, jurists, encyclopaedists, and historians, but few philosophers who occupied themselves with the operations of nature ; the commercial stimulus was a wanting to induce them to undertake voyages of exploration. Horace’s system of winds, several passages of Virgil on astro-meteorology, the statements concerning geological phenomena in the works of Ovid, and notices of the action of water in modifying the surface of the globe in the work on architecture by Vitruvius, all show a spirit of observation ; but, generally speaking, if we deduct what the Romans had received from the Greeks, there is little relating to oceanograph}^ that can be regarded as original among the writings of Latin authors. As Vivien de St. Martin remarks, however, never was a period more favourable than the reign of Augustus for the composition of a great work on descriptive geography. The Roman rule, spread as it was over more than half of the then known world, and attached to the remainder by political and commercial relations, created a propitious state of matters for an undertaking of this kind by furnishing to the geographer a ready means of investigation. A man appeared to carry out this work, for which the time was ripe, but this man was a Greek, Strabo,1 who produced the most important extant geographical work of antiquity. This celebrated geographer deals in a special way with problems relating to Strabo. oceanography.2 All things on the crust of the earth, according to Strabo, are in a con- tinual state of change, and the present relief of the surface of the globe is due to these modifications. Under the influence of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions the land is subjected to movements, oceanic waters invade the land when the bed of the ocean rises, and they retire when the bed sinks ; besides, these movements can be more easily produced beneath the sea, where the earth is, as it were, kneaded and made plastic by the water. He states that pelagic islands are of volcanic origin ; the greater islands, situated near the land, have been detached from the continents by dislocations ; the continents themselves are subject to oscillations, and might have been raised from the bosoms of the various seas. Running water works profound modifications on the surface of the land, but these changes are conditioned by the nature of the country through which streams and rivers pass. Torrents descending from mountains have a great erosive power, and the H: Y ■ >n : same is the case with livers which flow over soft or sandy grounds; both spread out on^U1^'*^..' the Mains and transport to the sea immense quantities of alluvial matter. The sediment 1 Born about 60 b.c. The year of his birth cannot be determined with certainty. 3 In this resume of Strabo’s doctrines we have followed H. Fischer, Ueber einige Gegenstande der physischen Geographic, bei Strabon, als Beitrag zur Geschichte der alten Geographic, Wernigerode, 1579. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. '24 lh* Vi kits on THE Level or mi Ocean. Mirr*i.CR. Tub Moirarjogi Wind. tmiu rivi-i> is not transported to great distances, for matter in suspension is arrested by : ' .v in- nts of the sea ; the bed of the ocean is not, in consequence, filled up so rapidly -on would think, but the places near the coasts are loaded with sandy materials, and it is ■ * , 1( that the greatest modifications take place. Finally, he attributed to winds an active ; : ; iii the ch anges taking place at the surface of the globe. To the combination of - forces he attributes what has since been called the sculpturing of the continents. As to the form of the oceanic basins and the relief of the bed of the sea, he believed t ,i ; here were valleys and mountains as on emerged land. All the seas which re united together, and all the parts of the great ocean which surround the knowm ... ..rid, h v. the same level, the surface of their waters is spherical, and the centre of - oh re coincides with the centre of the earth'; this notion cannot but be regarded us .great advance on that of Eratosthenes, who asserted that not only different seas but rt ii re A" ns of the same sea had different levels, wilich latter view is now believed to mj true to a certain extent, although Eratosthenes did not prove it. Strabo believed Ait > ii quilibrium was only established after the Black Sea and Mediterranean had burst their barriers, in the manner described by Eratosthenes and Strato. The Continuous current flowing from the Black Sea through the Bosphorus chiefly induced him to adopt this theory, but he rejected the view of those writers who argued that the lime nt brought to the Pontus Euxinus by rivers could have any considerable • ;f.-< • in filling up that sea and causing it to overflow. In speaking of waves, Strabo point out that whatever their force may be, it increases’ as the weaves approach - i>; . — this recrudescence of the wave on the coast does not depend on the force ■ m< instances. Strabo suggests that besides the world known to the Greeks and 1: -Mian*, other continents or other worlds might yet be discovered inhabited by different r - of men.1 Enough Lies been said to skowT the remarkable correctness of the O bservations and views of this celebrated Greek; many of them approach the concep- - - f mo-1- rn <_r -logy, and have been confirmed by modern research. (See Plate IV.) Str.iUj d.e not appear to have been acquainted with Hippalus, an Egyptian navigator, who lived out the same time, and proved the regular alternations in the • < t »n of the monsoons of the Indian Ocean, and profited by the discovery to open up i r-'Ut-- whs the high sea.s between the shores of the Red Sea and India.2 The monsoon * Strabo, L 4, ii. 5. ' .'if i F.r'fthru i, 67, ed. M iller ; Pliny, Hint. Nat., vi. 23, sec. 100; Vivien de St. Martin, Lc Nord de CAfrvpu dan * fantiquU/, p. 269, Paria, 1863. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 25 wind was called HippaJus in honour of this navigator. Coast routes, followed up to his time, were abandoned, and a fresh impetus was given to voyages in oriental waters. Pomponius Mela,1 who belongs to the same epoch, gives a few details referring to the Pomponius Mela. morphology of the ocean. He points out that four seas are, so to speak, deducted from the great ocean that surrounds the world, and penetrate into the bosom of the land , the Scythian Ocean thus forms the Caspian, arms of the Indian Ocean form the Persian and Arabian Gulfs, and, lastly, a fourth sea runs into the land from the west, but is designated by no special name. Up to this period the Romans had no other appellation for the Mediterranean than that of Mare Nostrum .2 Mela does not even employ the name Mare Internum , which is sometimes met with in Pliny’s writings. Solinus 3 was the first to make use of the word Mediterranean.4 Mela refers to the existence of the continent of the Antichthones, in the southern temperate zone, separated from the south of Africa and Asia by the Ethiopian Sea, the Red Sea, and the Indian Ocean, but inaccessible on account of the intervening torrid tract. This hypothetical continent includes the island of Ceylon, and is, indeed, in a sense, an immense extension of that island towards the west.5 (See Plate IV.). The philosopher Seneca6 applied himself with ardour to the study of nature, and his Fibst Century seven books of Physical Investigations (Quaestiones Naturales) may be considered as g rxi/. A presenting a general view of the knowledge of the ancients concerning the natural sciences. He supposes that the world, at its origin, was a chaos, in which the elements dissolved in the water separated out in the course of time. Igneous action, vigorous at first, became extinguished finally, and there remained only water at the birth of the actual world. He divides the waters of the globe into (l) oceanic waters, which are from all eternity, and form the principal mass, the source from which all others are derived ; (2) subterranean waters, which circulate in the faults of the subsoil, and appear at the surface in the form of springs ; (3) waters which circulate or remain stagnant on the top of the soil ; (4) waters in the form of vapours disseminated in the atmos- phere. He has very exact notions on evaporation, but he supposes that all the elements can be derived the one from the other, and that water, in particular, may be derived from earth.7 The course of the water in the air permits it to level the surface of the earth, Seneca’s view and to work incessantly in pulling down that which the volcanic forces have built up ; °-v K-' , iX although the action of this element is less striking than that of fire, its effect is not less Action of w Atl-r. considerable. In virtue, especially, of its continuous action, water affects the solid bodie- which constitute the land by dissolving and disintegrating them and transporting them, 1 Flourished about 43 B.c. 2 “ Id omne, qua venit, quaque dispergitur uno vocabulo Nostrum Mare dicitur” (i. sec. 6). 3 Flourished in the third century a.d. 4 Solinus, c. 24. 5 See Bunhury, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 353. 6 Born a few years b.c. 7 “ Quod hunt omnia ex omnibus, ex aqua aer, ex aere aqua, ignis ex aere, ex igne aer ; quare ergo non e term fiat aqua 1 ” (summary op results chall, exp. — 1894.) 4 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 26 SlX*CA OX Till Menu MCA i. Aenux or Water. Sexeca ox the Lc< el or the Oceax. ' 'iiK timfs fur from their place of origin. All rocks, even the hardest, are penetrated I y w ter. which dissolves them, at least partially. Seneca attributes this solvent ;k rion to the presence of a gas (spiritual). Thermal springs possess the power of m>-s< 'vit.g minerals in the highest degree, and among those which offer least resistance he < m n. rates salt, sulphur, nitre, alum, bitumen, and lime. The matters dissolved by \.;m i are n the chemical action of water shows that Seneca had clearly recognised those hydrothermic phenomena which play so important a role in geology.1 H ideas concerning the mechanical action of water are not less just. The hardest ro ks cannot resist the destructive effect of a repeated dropping of water, and the erosive effects of water are most pronounced when the forces in play are those of ir :ims, urrents, and the waves of the sea, as may be observed in the beds of rivers d on bold coasts. Everywhere water is seen victoriously attacking and destroying ■ k . tin chemical effects often precede the mechanical. Streams and rivers at all times, • especially during floods, transport clay, sand, and rocks, picked up from the layers v l . I 'key t -avers.’. The erosive power of waves is, however, even greater than that of r lining water; elitfs broken and smashed into ruins testify to the work of destruction effe t-d by the sea on coasts. Rivers deposit at their mouths the matter which they ■ nr in suspension, thus forming deltas. In their turn the mineral particles in .)-!>• U'ion in marine waters are deposited at the bottom of the sea, often at considerable m ■ from the coasts. Among the agents which take part in marine sedimentation, t: k - and currents are enumerated. Seneca points out that all waters, and especially th< *.*■■<• '»f the ocean, possess the power of clearing themselves from all impurities ; they may, in* E d, 1" said to wash the shores and lay down near them all matters in suspen- -> tliit in the course of centuries the lines of coasts undergo sensible modifications. Tt urface of the ocean is spherical ; its level remains constant in spite of the continuous "ii of river water, nor does the latter modify the saline taste of the sea, and he at t r l»ut<- this constancy in level and saltness to evaporation. At certain intervals, i; .V'-v- the normal height of the ocean undergoes a general but temporary elevation, i oxhif mg i i. luges with a sort of periodicity, and causing profound modifications on '! • -ur r. of the globe. These diluvial inundations do not, however, spread over the whole ’•'•uid only >me regions arc thus invaded. Such great phenomena cannot be referred t<> a . • glo c : i . ; several must unite to produce them, as torrents of rain, earthquakes, -lid p* rhaj.s other causes. The waters of the sea might easily cover the highest moun- r 1 r,:., , I »;• :•« i , i hen AnKhatmngen ties PbiloBophen Seneca, Wolfenbuttel, 1873 and 1876, Thcil ii. n> lo-ia. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 27 tains, for these have but a slight elevation when compared with the volume of the earth.1 In one of Seneca’s tragedies there is the most remarkable prophecy on record, pointing to the discovery of America, more remarkable than the suggestion of Strabo noted above. An immense land, new worlds, shall in later years, he says, be disclosed in the Ocean.2 Pliny the Elder3 held, as was generally admitted in his time, that the sea sur- Plin? the Elder, rounded the world like a girdle, which, he says, is a fact demonstrated by experience, and concerning which it is no longer necessary to indulge in speculations.4 The whole part of the work in which he deals with the ocean is full of errors and conjectures. He catalogues marine animals into one hundred and seventy-six species,5 being four less than the number recorded by Aristotle in the PEgean Sea alone. Pleased with his enumeration, he exclaims : — “ Surely, then, every one must allow that it is quite impos- His Views cox- sible to comprise every species of [land] animal in one general view for the information o^/nism^^1 ^ of mankind. And yet, by Hercules ! in the sea and in the ocean, vast as it is, there exists nothing that is unknown to us, and, a truly marvellous fact, it is with those things which Nature has concealed in the deep that we are best acquainted ! ” 6 Pliny confessed himself unable to give a detailed account of the depth of the ocean. Some parts he stated to be 15 stadia (1500 fathoms) deep, others “immensely deep, no bottom having been found.” In explaining very clearly “why the sea is salt,” he says : — “ Hence it is that the widely-diffused sea is impregnated with the flavour of salt, in consequence of what is sweet and mild being evaporated from it, which the force of fire easily accomplishes : while all the more acrid and thick matter is left behind, on which account the water of the sea is less salt at some depth than at the surface.” In this explanation Pliny followed Aristotle. To about the time of Pliny must be referred the Periplus of the Erythrgean Sea — an Periplus of thf important work, evidently compiled for the use of those engaged in the commerce -- iTIIUj:a-x "' a and navigation of the Indian Ocean at that period. The author gives a very characteristic description of the phenomena produced at the embouchures of rivers on the coasts of India, now known under the name of “ bores.” 7 During the reign of Hadrian, Flavius Arrianus wrote the Periplus of the Pontus Second Century Euxinus ; this work, which is simply an official report, adds little information of a pK^IPLCS 0F THK general kind to what was already known of the Black Sea, but gives copious and Pontus Euxnu accurate details regarding its coasts useful to navigators. Before considering the work of Ptolemy, a return to the ideas of Hipparchus 1 The ideas of Seneca upon the geological action of marine and fresh water, summarised above, are found in the first two chapters of the third book of Quiestiones Naturales. Dr. Nehring, op. cit., whom we have followed, has arranged these ideas methodically, in accordance with the rules followed in modern geological text-books. 2 “ Venient annis ssecula serfs, Quibus Ocean us vincula rerum Laxet, et ingens pateat tellus, Tethysque novos detegat orbes, Nec sit terris ultima Thule.” — Seneca, Medea , 376. J 23 to 79 A.D. 4 Pliny, Hist. Nat., ii. 66 “Nec arguments hoc investigandum, sed jam experiinentis coguitum.” 5 Some MSS. have 144 and some 164 species. 6 Fliny, Hist. Nat., xxxii. 53. 7 Periplu3 Maris Erythrmi, sec. 45, 46. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER, *28 v ,Nlso, Tv us. concerning the ocean must be pointed out. Marinus of Tyre1 rejected the opinion , f immcd ate predecessors, and maintained that the habitable world was not -i.iT.'iinded by the waters of the ocean. He held that the continental masses were united to other similar masses still unknown, and that the Atlantic and Indian Oceans were separated from each other. Nor does he appear to have admitted the existence of a sea (l) the east of Asia ; he attributed to that continent an indefinite extension towards the east. It is difficult to conjecture the reasons which induced Marinus to abandon the wiser and more correct views of Eratosthenes on these fundamental points of geography. Ptolemy. Ptolemt’s Views OX TIIE MOBPHO- LOOT OF THE Oceans. Ptolemv2 adopted the views of Marinus, and his great authority gave them a scientific stamp. Ptolemy was an astronomer, and treated physical geography as of secondary importance. In commencing his first baoks he described geography as being essentially the art of tracing the map of the world in the literal sense assigned by etymology to the word geography.4 (See Plate IV.). The greater part of Ptolemy’s works is taken up by the tables containing the materials which served him in the construction of his maps. In projection he was far in advance of Iris predecessors, and first used the words latitude and longitude as purely technical terms. Following Marinus, he rejected the hypothesis of an ocean extending to the ' ast of the Asiatic continent; he regarded that great land-mass as stretching inde- finitely towards the nurth and east. Africa was likewise extended without any settled limitation towards the south. Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, and even Strabo, did not know that the east coast of Africa turned suddenly to the south-west beyond Cape Aromata ;6 they believed that the shores of the regions which produced myrrh and incense extended as far as India. Ptolemy adopted this notion, although the merchants of Aden had informed him of the true position of the coasts as far south as Zanzibar. He united 1 point where the land appeared to him to trend towards the east, by unknown lands, to the Chinese coasts. The Indian Ocean thus formed a great enclosed sea. This Southern Ethiopia remained on maps down to the time of the second voyage of James Cook/ As we have just seen, Ptolemy’s conception of the morphology of the ocean differed from that held by many of his predecessors. With Ptolemy disappeared the great geographers of antiquity. ( A Two principal views prevailed among the ancients regarding the distribution of land ° T,i> and water. The school that may be called Homeric — to which Eratosthenes and Strabo - I r La'n \m, b* longed -considered the three continents of the Old World as forming a single island -unrounded by the ocean. On the other hand, the adherents of what may be called the Ptolemaic hool — to which Hipparchus and Marinus of Tyre belonged — did not admit * Flourished prolj*bly about 120 A.D. * Flourished about the middle of the second century a.d. 1 Ptolemy, L sec. 1. ‘ • i-.ob hi. i g< tfrupli;.* • 4 .iif dclincandi tabulae geograph icas." See Wildberg, cited by Bunbury, op. cit., vol. ii r«. 54*. 6 Gape Guardafui. < 1772 to 1775 a.d. (wc Peechel, Geschichte der Erdkunde, p. 61, Leipzig, 1877). THE WOULD according to PTOLEMY -AD. 150 ut. Pari 5 ll/brut&Lu TKe Voyage of H.M.S Ckalleag’ Summaiy of Result Plate 4 THE WORLD according to STRABO THE WORLD according to MELA AD. 4*3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 29 the extension of the sea around the known world. They considered the Atlantic and Indian Oceans to be great enclosed seas like the Mediterranean ; they held that the extreme points of the known land towards the east and the west approached so nearly to each other that a ship, parting from the west, might easily reach the eastern extremity, which they regarded as greatly extended. This error was perpetuated, thanks to the influence of Ptolemy, and led indirectly, fourteen centuries afterwards, to the discovery of the Newr World by Columbus. C.— OCEANOGRAPHICAL VIEWS DURING THE DARK AGES, THE MIDDLE AGES, AND THE RENAISSANCE. When the barbarians invaded and overran Europe during the fourth and fifth Fourth and centuries, ancient society as well as the science and geographical knowledge of antiquity Genttoies were swept away. The maps of Eratosthenes, of Marinus of Tyre, of Ptolemy were destroyed or buried for centuries beneath the ruins of ancient civilisation. The advanced views of the Greek philosophers concerning the figure of the earth, the motions of the heavenly bodies, and the distribution of land and water, were forgotten and were replaced by the crudest conceptions concerning natural things. It is not necessary to dwell on the errors which were current concerning the ocean during the centuries of decadence ; a few examples will suffice to show how great was the retrogression from the advanced ideas of the Greek geographers. In the sixth century Cosmas,1 like most of his contemporaries, spurned the doctrine Sixth Cex: oy of antipodes ; it is absurd, he said, for the earth is not a sphere but a quadrilateral . . J Cosmas Indico- plam, 4G0 journeys, or stations of 30 miles each, in length and 200 in breadth.2 The pledbtes. degeneracy of geographical ideas is shown by the figures given in the wTork of Cosmas, who passed in his time for a great geographer.3 1 Surnamed Indicopleustes — navigator of India. In early life he was an Egyptian merchant, and made several voyages to Indian ports ; later he adopted a monastic life, and wrote his “ Christian Topography.” 2 “Topographia Christiana” in Montfaucon, Coll, Nova Patrum, vol. ii. pp. 113 and 1706. 3 Plate V. presents a rough plan of the earth as conceived by Cosmas. He thought, as we have said above, that the earth was oblong, twice as long as broad, and that the ocean surrounded the earth. Beyond the ocean was a second earth, reaching everywhere to the walls of heaven. On the eastern side of this transmarine earth he thinks that man was created, and there also the paradise of pleasure is situated. As this is described as being on the eastern shore, our first parents when driven out of Paradise betook themselves to the finite land situated on the shore of the sea. From thence Noah and his sons were carried in the ark, when the deluge occurred, to the land which we now inhabit. Four rivers of Paradise, arising in Paradise, he says, are conveyed by subterranean channels to this our land, and burst forth in certain places. He believes the Caspian to be a sea joined to the ocean, which, as we have shown elsewhere, was a view held by certain of the ancients. Plate V. also represents a conical mountain rising from the hinderpart of the earth ; when this is reached by the sun, night is brought about for the inhabitants of the earth. There also the revolutions (periods) of the sun are indicated by lines whence arise the various seasons of the year. Thus, when the sun reaches the lowest line the nights are longer and the winter rpoirl] or period of the year takes place, the sun passes the greater part of his course behind the mountain ; when the sun ascends to the middle line the equinox is caused, and the sun in travelling his course reaches the equinoctial line. Finally, when the sun reaches the uppermost line the summer period takes place and the sun arrives at the tropic. Cosmas denotes the revolutions (periods) of the sun by the words “ winter night,” “medium night,” “summer night,” as shown in the figure. Wkxxi. Mats or thi M idols Aon 30 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Hi explains the form of the world by comparing it with the tabernacle of Moses. '1 u> stars are transported by angels, who are likewise charged with regulating lij - - The < iu-e of the succession of day and night is referred to the interposition of a rrivrtt mountain, behind which the sun disappeared each evening.1 The firmament \tendcd around the earth, the ocean, and the stars, enclosing them hermetically in its crystal walls. Iii the seventh century Isidore of Seville, starting from an idea suggested by the - i iptur.il phrase, “the circle of the earth,” and deriving, by a false etymology, rotutuiufus from rota , a wheel,2 declared consequently that the earth had the appear- ing? of a wheel, hence going back to the Homeric idea of a disc surrounded by the . ...l. Thuf originated the “wheel maps” which" ornament the manuscripts of the Middh Ages. These maps divide the circle of the earth into an eastern part, Asia, and into a western part, which is again subdivided into Europe and Africa. Jerusalem occupies the centre of the world. The north and south diameter is indicated by rivers — tli. Nil. and the Tanais;3 finally, the Mediterranean occupies the ray perpendicular to thi- diameter between Europe and Africa. The ocean surrounds the circle. This bipartite division was supported by a text of St. Augustine,4 which was much used by the co- mologist - of the period as a base for their cosmographical conceptions. (See Wheel map, Plate V.). What has been said above suffices to show the state of ignorance and the infantile "!i.:eption> as regards geography, to which the writers of the Dark Ages had descended. Th.- tudy of Nature was abandoned for the most adventurous speculation; there was a proclivit) to twist facts so as to make them agree with what was believed to be religious truth. In this shipwreok of geographical knowledge a few fragments floated ; some dim notion- of ancient science were preserved among the more learned; it may be said that dl the sense that was wTitten regarding Nature during the barbarous period was borrowed from the philosophical works of antiquity — Pliny, Solinus, or Mela being chiefly con- - 'I’h.' early part of the Middle Ages produced nothing that can be regarded as progress; geography was reduced to a simple enumeration of names of towns. The -<•: :. title id. is which animated the times of Strabo and Ptolemy had wholly disappeared. * A e.ilar opinion «u held by Anaximenes, who flourished in the sixth century b.c. “Orbw a rot indiuu eirculi dictus, quia nir.nt rota est,” Isidore, Origines, lib. xiv. cap. 2, 1. • The river Don. 4 Is- ( .Wat. Dei, xvi. 17 --“Unde videntur orbem dimidium dua; tenere, Europa et Africa, alium vero dimidium Asio . . Quapropter si in duo., partes orbem dividas, Orientis et Occidentis, Asia erit in una, in altera vero K - «-t Afr a. Tli it system of divirion bore the technical name of Divisio or Pistinctio trifaria. The ancients had td'T.'d a ,«. earth known to the Orccks and Romans. All the rest of the globe, that is to say three out of the •u - m- nt*. were unknown (see ante, pages 20, 21, and Vivien de St. Martin, op. cit., p. 169). SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 31 It is to be noted, however, that the form and extent of the seas to the north-west of Discoveries of Europe were sketched out from the voyages of the Norsemen, who peopled the islands iS/o* situated to the north of Great Britain. These hardy mariners enriched the geographical Ninth Centuries. knowledge of the Middle Ages by the discovery of Iceland, Greenland, and North America. Their voyages to the New World at this period were wholly unknown to the nations who did not speak the ancient language of the North.1 In the second half of the ninth century the Norsemen reached higher latitudes than had been previously attained. In 870 a voyage of discovery, undertaken by Ohthere, made known the north coast of Europe. This Norwegian sailor doubled the North Cape, penetrated into the White Sea, and arrived off the mouth of the Dwina. Almost at the same time the Dane, Wulfstan, explored the Baltic ; 2 but it was only in the eleventh century that geographers became really acquainted with this sea. Thus, Eghinard, the historiographer of Charlemagne, did not know that it was enclosed to the north ; it was in the time of Adam of Bremen, who wrote in 1075, that Scandinavia was discovered to be a peninsula. When the Arabs had extended their sway by a series of most extraordinary Voyages of the conquests, scientific investigation found a home among them, and geographical -know- ledge was cultivated. The voyages of the Arabs tended very greatly to develop ter- restrial science among a people marvellously endowed and rejoicing in all the vigour of youth. The accounts of the Arabian voyages, which were pushed as far as China, were collected by Abu Zaid about the year 851, and are a storehouse for the history of the geography of the period.3 Among the navigators of the first half of the ninth century was Soleiman, apparently one of the first Arabs to cross the Bay of Bengal, and pass Soleiman. beyond the Strait of Malacca into the China Sea. The narratives of the merchant Soleiman, and one of his contemporaries Ibn-Wahab, who visited Pekin, made a profound impression, from being the first account of these strange and little-known countries — an impression which the Arab imagination reflects in Sindbad the Sailor. Soleiman, like his narrator, Abu Zaid, came from Siraf, on the Persian Gulf. It was from this great port that the Arabs commenced to > count their subdivisions of the seas situated between their own country and China. This part of the ocean comprised seven subdivisions, which are 1 In the year 1000 Leif Erikson and his companions discovered the coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland (Helluland), Nova Scotia (Markland), and New England '(V inland). It has been alleged that a Norse colony flourished in Vinland for three centuries, during which time a transatlantic trade was carried on with Norway, and Profe=sor Horsford believes he has found some traces of an ancient Norse city on the Charles River, near Boston ; but the absence of nearly all the usual traces of a European colony renders this conclusion extremely doubtful (Horsford, Discovery of America by Norsemen, 1888 ; The Landfall of Leif Erikson, a.d. 1000, Boston, 1S92). The settlements formed by Thorfinn and others early in the eleventh century were soon abandoned, and in 1347 we have the last record of a voyage to America (Rafin, Antiquitates Americans, p. 84, Copenh. 1837). It has likewise been maintained that these voyages of the Northmen led directly to the voyage of Columbus in 1492, but this has in no way been substantiated ; it is doubtful whether Columbus had even heard of these voyages (see Du Chaillu, The T iking Age, vol. ii. p. 519, London, 1889 ; Reeves, The Finding of Wineland the Good, 1890). 2 The accounts of these voyages were preserved by Alfred the Great, king of England, one of the most remark- able men of the Middle Ages ; born 849. 3 See Reinaud, Relation des voyages faits par les Arabes et les Persans dans l’Inde et & la Chine, Paris, 1845. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Marin mu’ Com pam. enumerated by Mas'iidi,1 an Arabian naturalist and geographer of the tenth century, to whose works we shall presently refer.2 * The numerous and distant peregrinations of the Arabs need not be followed. It will su!’r-i " state that they were acquainted with the whole of Southern Europe, the southern half >>f Asia, North- West Africa as far south as 10° north, and the eastern coasts of the same continent as far as Cape Corrientes.:! In the time of Soleiman they had described in detail the islands in the Strait of Suuda, and everything indicates that they had landed on the Moluccas, Madagascar, and the Canaries. The Arabs must therefore be credited with the discovery of the Great Pacific beyond China, although it is generally maintained th..t this ocean was first made known by the travels of Marco Polo in the fourteenth century.4 (For .Arab maps of the 11th and 12th centuries, see Plate V.). Ouo of the most important results arising from the relations of the Arabs with China A believed to have been the introduction of the mariners’ compass. The property of the magnet was known to the Chinese from time immemorial, and they are reported to have applied it to navigation about the fourth century of our era, but this statement is not supported by sufficient evidence. The Arabs are supposed to have learnt the use of this marvellous apparatus in the East, and through them it is said to have passed to the sailors of the Mediterranean. Marco Polo does not, however, mention the mariners’ compass, and we have no certain knowledge that it was in use among Chinese sailors at a time long posterior to the Arab voyages of the tenth or eleventh centuries. The Eg\ ptians were accustomed to suspend the loadstone at the end of a string and to observe its motions. In its primitive form among sailors of the west the compass was -imply a needle that had been touched with the loadstone and was floated on a piece of cork or on a straw during the night or misty weather. In this form it was in use among nortl rn sailors as early as 1100 a.d., and it may quite well have developed in their Finds into a complete nautical instrument. For a long time there appears to have been a prejudice against its use among sailors. Roger Bacon is reported to have said that no master mariner dared use it, so great was the appearance of its being constructed under the influence of some infernal spirit.5 1 Flourished about 015 A.D. - ’•! l nil, Meadow - of Gold and Mines of Gems, translated by Aloys Sprenger, M.D., London, 1841 ; Les Prairies cl' Or, to xte et traduction, par MM. Barbier du Meyriard et Courteille, Paris, 1861. s See J. T. Bent, op. cit., p. 190. 4 Jap ii. w-a known to the Arabs as the Wak-wak Islands. For an account of an expedition of a fleet, from Japan !' Ka-t Africa in a.d. 945, -<:e De Goege, Vers lag. krm. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam , 1881, ser. 2, part x., Afd. Lctterkunde, p. 180. The following is an extract from a letter from Latini to Cavalcanti describing a visit to Roger Bucou at Oxford, ; uvntjy m the )cur 1258 : — “This discovery, which appears useful in so great a degree to all who travel by sea, ri ist ' main ■ < ab I until other times ; ln.-cause no mast r-mariner dare* to use it, lest he should fall under a supposition ' f hi > b in.’ k magician ; nor would even the sailors venture them elves out to sea under his command, if he took with him in >n rurnent which carries so great an appearance of being constructed under the influence of some infernal pint. A time may come when there prejud < s which are of such great hindrance to researches into the secrets of TRe Voyage of H.J1S “Clt.alleri.ger’’ Summary of Results P late o Terr cl ultra Oceanian,, uli ante. diluvuaw lialltanl. Iwrnuuz s THE MOUNTAIN OF COSMAS DTDICOPLETJSTES Censing Day & Night and. Seasons 006 Occiderui Sob Or uvui ■WORLD MAP OP COSMAS INDICOPLEUS TE S _VI Cent. Reduced Facsimile from the GOTHA M.S. OF THE BOOK OF CLIMATES ■written A.D. 1173 fromMceller’s ISSTAKHRY TU 2 (1 il bur fiynjgr ajibn a ft! Tngt-i+rrtjt SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 33 Notwithstanding their frequent voyages in Indian seas, many of the Arabs continued Ueogkaphk to hold the erroneous idea enunciated by Ptolemy regarding the morphology of that a,^^N8 °* ocean. That celebrated geographer, as we have seen, regarded the eastern coast of Africa as advancing towards the east beyond the peninsula of Malacca to the south of China, instead of taking a southern trend from the promontory of Rhaptum, near Zanzibar. Many Arabs, then, looked on the Indian Ocean as a Mediterranean — an enclosed sea ; some of them even regarded the Indus and the Nile as branches of the same river. Cape Guardafui did not exist with them ; from that point the African land turned to the east, the coast of Zanzibar was placed opposite the Indus, that of Sofala faced Ceylon, and Madagascar approached so closely to the islands of the Straits of Sunda as to coalesce with J ava or Sumatra. Such are the features presented by the Indian Ocean on the planisphere of Edrisi, the best known of oriental geographers, constructed for Roger of Sicily in 1154. This false idea was perpetuated for a very long time among the Christian nations of the Middle Ages. While Greek theory continued to hamper the Arabs, some writers in the early part of the ninth century, for instance Ibn-al-Faklh, held just views.1 The Indian Ocean was sometimes regarded as communicating with the all-encircling ocean by a strait in the extreme east, and sometimes widely continuous with the encircling ocean. Nearly all writers agree that there is a great sea to the east of Asia, Arab merchants having traded as far as Japan and the Corea. Yacut states that the *Sea of Zanzibar and the Indian Ocean are identical, and communicate with the encircling ocean. Travellers had told him that they had gone so far to the south that the pole star and great bear were lost to sight, and the south pole and canopus were high in the heavens. All the seas, according to Yacut, except the Caspian, communicate with the encircling ocean which nature, will probably be no more ; and it will be then that mankind shall rea]> the benefit of the labours of such learned men as Friar Bacon, and do justice to that industry and intelligence for which he and they now meet with no other return than obloquy and reproach” (see Major, Prince Henry the Navigator , pp. 58, 59). Vivien de St. Martin (op. cit., pj. 247) says it is quite indisputable that the Arabs received from the Chinese the knowledge of the compass. He adds : — “ It was through the Arabs that it arrived among the sailors of the Mediterranean at the time of the second crusade, although there is a want of precise information on the subject.” Peschel (op. cit., p. 205) is r ot so affirmative with respect to this matter ; he says : — “ That the magnet arrived in Europe from China directly or by the hands of the Arabs has never been thoroughly established.” To demonstrate that the Arabs had been the intermedi- aries, it has been usual to found upon the fact that Albertus Magnus (De Mineralibus, lib. ii. tract iii. cap. 6 : Lugd. 1651, tom. ii. fol. 243), employs the words Aphron and Zoron to designate the south and the north, and that these words are of Arabic origin. Peschel, relying on the authority of Reinaud (Aboulfeda, p. ccii.) and of Santarein (Hist, de la Co3mographie, tom. i. p. 295), holds that these expressions are borrowed from the Hebrew (see S. Ruge, Gescliichte des Zeitalters der Entdeckungen, Berlin, 1881, p. 39). The magnet may possibly have been a Norman discovery. The Italian bussola and French boussole come, it has been said, from the Flemish boxal, hence the expression to box the compass. Flavio Giogo, of Amalfi, in 1307, probably first swung the compass on a pivot. The compass is mentioned as early as 1100 a.d. (see Hallam, Middle Ages, vol. iii. p. 394). Alexander Neckham, an English writer of the twelfth century, describes the compass carried by ships (see Nature, vol. xiv. pp. 147-148, 1876; Lindsay, Ii: r-. of Merchant Shipping and Ancient Commerce, vol. i. pp, xlii., xliii.). 1 According to Ibn-al-Faklh (ca. a.d. 900), there are four seas, — (1) the Great Sea, which extends from Maghri : to Kol- zom (Suez) and to the Wak-wak Islands of China (Japan) ; (2) the Mediterranean, — the Western or Roman Sea ; (3) the Caspian ; (4) the unnavigated sea of Thule, between Riunia and Khawarezm (Ibn-al-Faklh, Leyden, 1885, p. 7 (summary of results chall. exp. — 1894.) ;al T UK OlKKRAl'IIV AND Bathymetry nr mr Ara ip* Cora i. Isiaxiw. A BAR VlRVo kHAKMXO THE Amo* or Water. 34 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. v ■ 1> two principal branches into the land masses. The eastern branch forms the China N'.i, tie Indian Sea. t lie Arabian and Persian Gulfs, and the Sea of Zanzibar: the u. t rn 1 ranch forms the Mediterranean. The water of these branches is derived from tl ii ■ iiu o -i an. Navigation is confined to the branches, no ship having traversed tlx cm-ircling sea. Yacut states that the inhabited climes are all north of the equator.1 The Vrabs have left very few documents relating to orography or bathymetry. It i.- i ir- ly that we find in their writings even an evaluation of the heights of mountains. Ibn Khaldun, who, in the fourteenth century, wrote his celebrated History of the Berbers, n m rks that if the highest mountains are situated near the sea, it must be regarded as a providential arrangement to arrest the invasion of the ocean.2 The Arabs do not seem t.. iv liven aware of the significance of volcanic phenomena from a geological point ■f view. They admitted, however, that the surface of the globe was subject to changes ; ha: tlx ' might occupy the place of the land or be confined within narrower limits. We find them recording observations on the formation and destruction of coral 1>. Vl-Biriini3 points out that in the Laccadives and Maldives several islands ink bt neath the waters, while others were raised above them, so that they became 1: ibitabh one after the other. He says : — “The name of Dyvah is given to islands that t * r i *_r i n.it e in the sen, and appear above the water in the form of sand-banks; these banks ii growing extend and unite till they present a solid aspect. At the same time others • >f these islands by breaking up decompose, melt, and disappear in the sea; when the inhabitants perceive this, they retire to some new island that is on the increase, transport int i these th.-ir cocoa-nuts, palms, grains, and utensils, and finally establish a new home.”4 N lions concerning the geological action of water, and the sediments carried into the i and then solidified, are met with in the writings of Kazwini.6 Al-Bimm, whom we !n\. ju t cit' d, embraced the idea previously expressed by Megasthenes,6 according to wh i Bengal has been formed by the accumulation of sediment deposited by the Ganges. A Min imi al s* . shows that he had observed the distribution of materials transported by v iter. II point- out that the larger fragments are laid down at the upper parts of riv that grav i ! is formed in the lower portions of their course, and that, finally, sand and the finer particles are carried into the ocean.7 W find in M Mud! examples of the carriage of fluviatile sediments, the accumulation f Mibb causes the ■ a to retire. He had been profoundly impressed by the sanding-up 1 Yacut, Diet., Leipzig, 1866, pp. 601, 604. * I u K’ i in, Hiitoiri .Ii Berbers, trad, de 1’Arabe par M. Slane, Paris, 1852, tom. i. p. 194. * Flourished about 1000 a.d. * . - • 1 1 ■ ii i, by s.v:hii i, London, 1888, p. 106, and Al-Blrunl, Reinaud, No. III., “Extrait de l’Ouvrage 'Altar 'ini *ar l'Inde, Journal Anatique, ser. 8, tom. iv. p. 265, 1884. ‘ K : ni' r ij : . , n/icb der Wustenfiddiohen Textuuegabe, aus dem Arabisclien von H. Ethe, Leipzig, 1809. M* „ i- h v i- • nt t India by Set acus about 3'»2 B.C., and was probably the first Greek to reach the banks ( ; • > i rig> «, . r; nlv 1 1.*- tut * riter to gi\e an account of the country from personal observation. 1 AlWroni'a India, Sacbau, p. 198. SUMMARY OR RESULTS. 35 produced by the Tigris and Euphrates ; he cites the case of the city of Hira, formerly a seaport, which, after the lapse of three hundred years, was situated far in the interior.1 The same author devotes a chapter to setting forth the ideas current at that time with reference to the origin of the sea and the cause of its saltness. Side by side with purely hypothetical conceptions, one meets with interpretations and comparisons which show that the Arabs were possessed of tolerably correct notions on many cjuestions relating to the sea. MasTidi admitted the spherical form, of the earth and of the surface of the ocean ; when Ma-^uia one sails on the open sea the low-lying land first disappears, then the mountains sink gradually, and, at last, the summit is lost to sight.2 He thus supports his views by reference to the classical example; indeed, in all this the Arabs simply followed the Greeks, and especially Ptolemy. In speaking of marine animals Mas'udl merely relates marvellous accounts of certain creatures ; he says that some seas contain animated beings, while others, the Great Ocean for instance, have none.5 The naturalist appears to better advantage in the passages relating to the origin of the ocean and its saltness, to which reference has been made. “ Some maintain,” he writes, “ that the sea is a remnant of the primitive 1 MasTidi, op. cit. See, in particular, the anecdote of Khaled and Ahd-el-Mesih, vol. i. ch. ix. pp. 248-253. 3 Mas‘udl, op. cit., vol. i. ch viii. p. 213. This demonstration was formerly used by the ancients (see Almagest, lib. i. ch. iii. p. 12, ed. Halma). 3 Mas'udl, op. cit., tom. i. ch. viii. p. 185. See, for example, his account of the unicorn, whale, dragons, and crabs. Notwithstanding all the improbability of the narration in which the Arab writer gives his imagination free play it may not be without interest to quote a passage relative to marine monsters. It shows, at least, the preoccupation they had with reference to animals living in the sea, and the speculations in which they indulged regarding the exploration of the ocean. The following is the legend reported by MasTidi relative to the foundation of Alex- andria: — “The building of Alexandria was commenced, and the foundations laid, when, protected by the night. animals rose out of the depths of the sea, and destroyed all that had been done Just at the same rate as the work advanced, and in spite of the presence of the guards charged to drive them away as they came out of the water, the work in the city was every morning destroyed. Alexander was seized with anxiety at this spectacle ; he meditated on what he should do to free. the city from this great calamity. One night, while he reflected in solitude on these events, a stratagem occurred to him. The next day he called his workmen, and ordered them to construct a box of wood ten arms’ lengths long and five wide. All around in the interior of this box plates of glass were fixed, and layers of pitch, resin, and other substances were applied to the wood to prevent the water from penetrating into the interior. They also reserved a place for attaching ropes. Alexander then entered it along with two of his secretaries, clever artists — and commanded that the cover of the box should be closed, and stopped up with similar coatings of pitch, &c. Two large vessels now put to sea. Weights of iron and lead and heavy stones had been fixed to the lower part of the box in order to carry it to the bottom, for, being filled with air, it would otherwise have floated. Then the box was attached by cables between the two ships, which were presented from separating from each other by planks placed between them ; the cables were now allowed to run out, and the box descended to the bottom of the sea. Thanks to the trans- parence of the glass and the limpidity of the water, Alexander and his companions saw marine animals and species of demons having a human form and a head like that of ferocious beasts. Some held hatchets, some saws or hammers, resembling workmen with tools. Alexander and his fellow-adventurers traced and figured on paper all these monsters, reproducing their exact aspect, their stature, and varied forms. He then shook the cords, and at this signal the box was drawn up by the sailors of the two vessels. Alexander then came out of the box and returned to Alexandria. There he ordered the workmen who wrought in iron, copper, and stone to reproduce these animals according to the drawings he had brought. The figures being finished, he caused them to be placed on blocks along the shore, and pro ceeded with the construction of the city. Night arrived. When the marine monsters came up out of the water, and found themselves face to face with their own images placed along the edge of the sea, they immediate y look to open ocean, and never showed themselves again.” » THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. SlI.TNEv* or TUB Set — EvjimiiA- nos. IlMCAIluXt or A TUI So KX Tine Mrmoo ‘M I'M. v ;’i •• at-r part of which has been dried up by fire, and the surplus has been t, :r .me ! under the influence of lieat. Others allege that the whole of the primitive • v iru ing be n submitted to the devouring action of the sun in its revolutions, all :!i. ii. an have been removed, and the present ocean is merely a saline and bitter r There arc others who assert that the sea is simply the secretions which flow in m the earth scorched by the heat of the sun during its constant revolutions. S 1 i . \ that the sea is nothing else than the primitive humidity separated from all ! terrestrial principles, just as fresh water mixed with ashes loses its sweetness and r tains a saline taste even after it has been filtered. It is also supposed that in v .. tl fr sh nd salt parts were mixed, and that the sun volatilised the fresh portions I . u - «- their subtility, be it that it absorbs these parts itself, be it that once arrived in hi _r i r- : where cold condenses them and gives them, so to speak, a new form, they « • 1 1 : t n "_r • . second time into water. It is held that water being an element, the molecules v 'h i, found in the air and under the action of cold have a soft taste, while the n 1 u hid: remain on the land take up a bitter flavour under the influence of the v. : h p-not rat- s them. Several learned men have held that the mass of water which fl into t he ocean either from the surface of the soil or from subterranean passages, 1 iv” - •in arriv d at that vast reservoir, has absorbed everywhere the saline principles v • i ih discharges into it. It is not to be wondered at, then, that the water of the rves dways the same weight and bulk, since the subtile parts, which heat removes, - n into dew and water whence arise mountain streams, which fall into rivulets v • i u - and flow into the wet places of the land, until they arrive, at last, in the • whirlpool of the ocean. It is thus that absolutely none of the water is lost, and a; like machines which, drawing water from a river, return it to a rivulet that p -- • it again to the river It is evident, from experience, that all humid : :t< endowed with a certain relish, having passed through the retort and still, preserve in tin a sublimate the same smell and taste, like vinegar, date wine, rose saffron, gilly- l! ■ it< , except, however, saline substances, which change the taste and smell, p«- dh when they are submitted twice to the operation of fire and the still.”1 It will b • seen from this quotation, which may be regarded as a correct resume of t - hi, -iv. h-dge of the Arabs on this matter, that Mas‘udl possessed exact notions about t p:i. n<.n, na of evaporation, the formation of rain, and, in general, on the aerial ’. i ! : i t i • . j i of v. at r, and on the saltness and conservation of the same in marine basins, i •• - *ion h, no doubt, disfigured by errors; it lacks precision and definiteness, • ••• ‘i.. i-iui-'iph - expn - <-d are true, and prove the relative state of advancement of \i philosophy. In the closing sentences of the above passage the author explains i *ii i of ii ,-tur- by comparison with those which take place in the laboratory. I i Pc hel has noted, one of the first occasions on which we meet with this truly 1 M vi‘u ajw Wat**. 38 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. n Li riling the distance,1 but in support of the view that the space is not great he quotes s . i, ;!,<• passage in Esdras pointing to the ocean occup3ung only a seventh part of the , arth’s surface, J and the famous voyages to Ophir mentioned in the Bible.3 Bacon’s : _ui, tents and quotations were copied into the popular book by Petrus Alliacus called /m Afundi published early in the fifteenth century. Columbus’s own copy of this work is still to be seen at Seville with his annotations on the margin. Here he first l.o -a me acquainted with the arguments of the Greek philosophers with reference to the ] .b ibb extent of the habitable world, and their speculations as to the possibility of crossing the Atlantic to the coasts of India. It is probable that the reading of this book and these extracts from Bacon first suggested to Columbus the idea of a voyage across t he Atlantic ; it is not likely he had any direct acquaintance with the works of Boger Bacon. S .me interesting information regarding the opinions held during the Middle Ages with r _r.>! 1 to the listribution of land and water is to be found in a treatise which is now aim. >>t universally admitted to be a genuine work of the poet Dante, who may be regarded is tit. 1 raid of the Benaissance. Dante refers the elevation of the land above the water til. inlluence of the stars “by way of attraction as the magnet draws the iron, or by iv of impulsion, generating impelling vapours, as in certain mountains.” The tides are 1 1 i Trod to the action of the moon. The sphericity of the earth and the equality of the h v. 1 of the sea in different oceans are also discussed.4 In the Inferno he makes Ulysses ,ir his companions to venture on a voyage into the great ocean beyond the Pillars of Hercules.® I . 'torn d Arezzo regarded the dry land as occupying only one-tenth of the surface of the gb’l ■>*, and held the opinion that the waters of the ocean were accumulated in the N.nih.TD L mi.'phere. We have already noted that this view was current among the An!-. 11> Mates this definitely in his interpretation of the Arabian celestial charts. These • le-tial pheres only show the stars visible at the horizon of Cairo or Alexandria ; no -tar- art- represented at the South Pole. Bistoro supposed, from a consideration of these h rt- th M the earth was formerly completely covered by the sea, that afterwards, by a ; . vid.-ntial decree, the stars were all grouped in the northern celestial hemisphere, that ..r. ,n. waters had been driven towards the south, and, as a consequence of this retreat < ■ land appeared in our hemisphere. He also pointed out that should the con- ] n, Opus Magnum, edi«l it S. Jebb, fol. 184, London, 1733. Roger Bacon gives two figures to illustrate the • ; • ; • . that a narrow sea separates the eastern and western portions of the habitable world. * See ante, p. 2. " M n Tn i fol. 183 ; reach. 1, op. cit., p. 202. Albcrtus Magnus had, before Bacon, expressed the idea that ■ n-e an it was believed to be to the west of Spain. He says: — “ Inter horizontem habitantium j ' : x • i f br <: Orieiitem habitantium in India non est in medio, ut dicunt, nisi quoddarn mare parvum” (Ds t M ’ i >, lib. it. tract, iv. cap. 11 ; tom. ii. fol. 146, Lugd. 1651). Albertus supports his view upon the text < f An«totle relative to elephants, which we have cited (p. 14). ‘ q ■ n ell’ Aqua »■ della Terra di Dante Alighieri, Opp. Lat. di Dante, ed. Siuliani, vol. ii. ; see also Gardner, Salure, vol. xlvii. p. 205. 6 Canto xxvi. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 39 stellations be transported towards the south the state of matters would be reversed, and the sea would invade the emerged land.1 An anonymous writer explains the saltness of the sea as resulting from the action of its waters on the land of the coasts, from which they dissolve the saline and bitter parts.2 Vincent de Beauvais caught a glimpse of the cause of atmospheric precipitation. He knew that the sea constantly lost water by evaporation, and that this was brought back to it again by springs and rivers.3 Side by side with these correct ideas, many false ones are encountered bearing on meteorological questions, and fanciful inter- pretations are given regarding the cause of the tides. In general, the schoolmen do not offer any truths in addition to what was known to the ancients. The ancients, who made so many excellent circumnavigations of the Mediterranean, never constructed general or coast charts of that well-known sea. The marine charts of the Middle Ages therefore demonstrate an immense progress in knowledge with regard to the morphology of the seas. The compass charts, or portulani, a name applied Compass Charts both to the charts and the accompanying sailing directions, made their appearance in fJt: 1 ORTULVNV Italy in the thirteenth century, and, for the most part, were intended for the naviga- tion of the Mediterranean. Probably the most ancient is that of Petro Vesconti of Genoa, and bears the date 1311. 4 The development of commerce in the Mediter- ranean after the Crusades, and the knowledge of the compass which permitted voyages on the high seas, rendered the aid of these charts much more necessary than when ships followed courses from island to island, and from cape to cape. It was soon after this that marine maps came into use. These starred charts of the Italians and Catalonians, as well as previous productions of the kind, have no true parallels or meridians. They were traced by the aid of the compass, and were constructed without graduation. They present, however, especially in those parts much frequented by pilots, a remarkable fidelity in the contours and distances, and a sur- prising exactness in the general forms. The Black Sea, for example, differs but little from its representation on charts of the present day.5 The charts of this sea used by sailors before the hydrographic exploration of Gauttier at the commencement of this century fell far below the Italian charts of the thirteenth century in exactness. The Mediterranean was represented more accurately on the portulani of the Italians than by Mercator. Several of these charts were designed in the Italian ports, some in the island of Majorca. They not only embraced the Mediterranean and the adjacent internal seas, but 1 Peschel, op. cit., p. 222. 2 Vincentius Bellovacensis, Speculum Naturale, lib. v. cap. 9. 3 Spec. Nat., lib. v. cap 8. 4 It is believed, says Vivien de St. Martin {op. cit., p. 294), that a Venetian chart of the Black Sea, preserved at Venice in the library of St. Mark, dates from the commencement of the thirteenth century. It is known that the Black Sea was, in a way, a Venetian sea from 1204 to 1259 ; but he adds that the first dated chart, and consequently unequivocally authentic, is the portulano of the Genoese cartographer Petro Vesconti. 6 See in Peschel {op. cit, p. 217) for a representation of the Black Sea after a manuscript chart belonging to the library of Munich, dated the beginning of the fifteenth century. 40 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Catalan Chart, 1375. The Renaissance — Middle or FirrtENrn Cexttrt. , x 1 into the Atlantic; the coasts of Europe as far as Flanders, the British Islands, uni th< on ts of Africa as far as Cape Bojador take definite form and are well drawn. T tno.'t remarkable of these compass-charts is known as the Catalan chart, now pr s.-rved in the National Library of Paris. It is a map of the world in six sheets, dat< 1 1375, and is at once a planisphere and a marine chart. The author was a pilot .it!* Llind ot Majorca. It indicates, in particular, the new islands discovered in the V ntic and the coasts of the Caspian, and shows the greatest progress in the representa- tion of the Indian Seas. It is on this Catalan chart that India appears for the first •im- as . peninsula, and the Indian Ocean is no longer a Mediterranean as had been vi usly represented. The coast of Africa is not limited towards the south, as delineated by Ptolemy and the Arabs.1 These charts are works of positive geography from their exactness, and they surpass in this respect the other like productions of the same time, whether maps of the world, planispheres, <>r written descriptions. In spite of their correctness, however, these H.rtulani cannot be considered true scientific charts. It may be said that an exact knowledge of the coasts of the sea preceded that of the inland portions of the continents . . 1 : d large islands. .Almost all peoples in the infancy of their civilisation possess graphic < l'i. 'cntations of their coasts, which may be regarded as not differing greatly from those ; - , .1 by the sailors of the period now under consideration. From the ancient Mi xicans, Cortes received charts which enabled the Spanish navigators to find their way dong the Mexican coasts; Pany discovered the Strait of Fury and Heela by directing his < oin -e according to a chart drawn by an Esquimaux woman; Ross and M‘Clintock, like Firry, made use of charts furnished them by the Esquimaux. However, the •ompass-charts added greatly to the knowledge of the forms of seas and oceans; the element awanting in them is compensated for by the scrupulous correctness by which they are distinguished. A volution took place through the Renaissance. Learned Greeks arrived in Italy .!•• the. capture of Constantinople in 1453, and the introduction of paper permitted t h«- -jr eat gr. >gr;i.phical works of antiquity to be popularised. From the end of the fifteenth • i : : y phmiapheric representations without graduation were abandoned, and, after a ip of it t hoo-aud years, maps were once more constructed on mathematical principles. Ti re appearance of Ptolemy’s Geography with its clearly drawn maps produced a pr -!" , ml elfect in Western Europe. Nordenskibld 2 says that when this great work was ! from the expiring Byzantine Empire in the fifteenth century it had the effect of .n important discovery, which seized on men’s minds at first with even more force 1 (.a 1 Columbus’ own brother, Bartholomew, is believed to have taken part in the voyage of Bartholomew Diaz around the Cape of Good Hope. 2 In October 1502 Columbus, while in the neighbourhood of the Chirigui Archipelago, learnt from a native th; nine days’ journey to the west there was another ocean. This was the first hint of the Pacific which reached Euro; . .ns 44 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. I’uKTliGUBUE IN iusrm Seas Cajturs or Mauom. Spanish F-XPLOHATIOSS. The Cabots. Hope, and in May 1498 arrived at Calicut. Before twenty years had passed away tin Portuguese pilots had mapped out the hydrography of the Indian and Chinese seas -utluiently for the first requirements of navigation. The circumnavigation of Eastern Africa was completed; the Pied Sea as well as the Persian Gulf were recognised ; the peninsula of India was drawn in its true form, as well as the transgangetic peninsula ; and ! s great part of the archipelagoes extending from Sumatra to the Moluccas and New Gain- . were visited. If it be remembered that these seas and shores were, we might say, absolutely unknown in Europe at the time Gama passed the south of Africa, and if we all the incorrect representations given on Ptolemy’s map and the maps of the fifteenth century, we shall appreciate the immense additions that the Portuguese made in so short a time to the map of the world, more particularly to the oceanic charts. When in 1511 Albuquerque carried Malacca by storm, a new centre of operations was reated in the extreme east. Portuguese vessels radiated from thence in all directions through the archipelagoes of Oceania and towards the coasts of China. The coasts of Sumatra and Java were surveyed; the Sunda and Philippine Islands, Japan, Borneo, Celebes, and the north-west of New Guinea were explored. Tae voyage of Columbus in 1492 was only the first step towards the discovery of the New World ; it took many years and many voyages to complete the discovery of America. Other expeditions, official and clandestine, crossed the Atlantic in rapid succession. While the Cabots and the Cortereals explored the coasts of North America from Labrador to Florida, Columbus visited many of the West Indian Islands and the north coast of South America. Pinzon and Solis with Vespucci landed at Honduras, and coasted aiou’. 1 the Gulf of Mexico ; 1 Pinzon explored the coast of South America to 8° south ; and Cabral was accidentally driven on the coast of Brazil in 1500, and explored from 12° to 16 south. This landfall of Cabral is interesting as showfing that, even without Columbus, the discovery of America could not have been long delayed. It ha- generally been held that Columbus lived and died in the belief that he had i' h*d the Asiatic continent. We know that during his second voyage he made his • row affirm before a notary that Cuba was a part of Asia, and that as late as 1503 h v re to to the Spanish sovereigns that he had reached the province of Mango, near Cathay. In going west he believed he was approaching the mysterious realms of Pr* st«T John. Harrisse has, however, produced documentary evidence that some of ( !ui. bus's companions and contemporaries, nay even Columbus himself, had clearly r g; b, as early as 1501, that the coasts of the New World tvere not the coasts of V • . n ar.<: Fi*ke spj/t.-ir to have satisfactorily explained the mystery about the first voyage of Vespucci ; ... mi:1. ! with i n nr, 1 Sola an pilot and cosmographer in 1497, explored the coasts of Honduras and Florida, and r« tarn* i OcUv . r 149S by way of Bermudas with 222 slaves on board (Vamhagen, Amerigo Vespucci : son caractere, • i < t.' (n. nr Icj in ins ■nthentiqu"'), su vie et sea navigations, Lima, 1865, and Le premier voyage de Amerigo \ ; ■ i "iith America, later on called Cape Horn. “At length the vessel (of the Admiral) f'.und it . If m ar the extremity of the country extending towards the South Pole, which • v' . n.' ■ mu or in -t advanced point of all these islands (Tierra del Fuego), is situated near the 5C«th degree. Beyond this, towards the south, wc found neither islands nor Ki 1, D*-r O. an, p. 35 ; Pigafetta (Premier voyage autour du Monde, p. 52, Paris, l’an ix) says: — “For • . ■ i in I tw. ui’ ! iv wc mailed abou* 4000 leagues on that sea which we called the Pacific, because during all ' : • n v ■ did not experience a single storm, neither did we discover any land, with the exception ' - r i- oi, n vhi h wc fo id nothing hut Birds and trees, and for this reason we named them the Unfor- ‘ >’■ II nwibU lo find any bottom a low) their coasts, and saw only a number of sharks. These islands \r<- ■> l«vuc* apart, tne first in 16* south latitude, the second in 9*.” * P ‘ A i lin to the reckoning we made with the chain astern, we ran each day fifty or sixty V \ v P- ! til- World, Hakluyt Society, p. 05 ; Guillemard, Life of Ferdinand Magellan, London, Tin • t d' rij tion of the 1 >g, nr loggff dates from the time of Bourne, 1577 (see Breusing, Zeitschr. ’ i ii' 111 't Bourne wrote the “ Rules of Navigation.” In the Encyclopaedia Britannica (art. • *< v! :'.at il If liiK w a used ip navigation as early as 1570, and alluded to bv Bourne in 1578. The Voyage of H M S "Challenger Summary of Results PI ate MAP OF THE WORLD showing the GREAT m 3 C DTE 'PJ E S 1492 - 1522 Jhxjions discovered hr the F.*rtu*ji*’s+ Kmtihjth Ibn Batata OZS -134& SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 47 continents, but only the meeting of the Atlantic and the South Sea, in a vast and free space.”1 In North America Drake reconnoitred a country, till then unexplored, on the western coast, from Cape Mendocino (in lat. 41^° N.) northwards to near lat. 48° N., not far from the Vancouver archipelago, now called the Oregon coast. The search after a north-east passage from Europe to Asia must have been suggested Search fob by the form given to the northern part of the Asiatic continent in Ptolemy’s map. XorhiV^-/' ° Sebastian Cabot was one of the promoters of Willoughby’s Expedition, which went Passages. in search of this passage in 1553. This expedition was a repetition of the periplus of Scandinavia formerly accomplished by Ohthere. One of the three vessels commanded by Chancellor reached the White Sea, and anchored in the harbour of Archangel, whence Chancellor proceeded to Moscow and concluded a commercial treaty with the Russians. In 1556 Stephen Burrough continued the discoveries of the preceding expedition, and reached the Strait of Kara, but proceeded no further. The attempts of the Dutch to pass around Asia by the north-east were not more successful. The fruitless expeditions of the Dutch have, however, left their trace on the history of navigation. To them we owe the discovery of the trvo largest islands in the boreal seas — Nova Zembla and Spitzbergen ; on reaching the northern extremity of Spitzbergen, in 1596, in latitude 80° 11' N., Barents had penetrated further north than any former navigator. The idea of a north-west passage was revived twelve or fifteen years after Chancellor’s voyage, but we need not follow the endeavours made in that direction by Frobisher, John Davis and Hudson, between the years 1576 and 1610, although their vo}Tages furnished much information on the morphology of the northern seas. At the time of Magellan the only coasts of America known were those laved by the Atlantic ; of the western coasts only a very small part had as yet been seen, but on the coasts of Africa, Asia, and Oceania the work of discovery was continued and largely completed. The maps drawn in the last quarter of the sixteenth century show at a glance Charts of the the degree of knowledge arrived at regarding the New World. The general contour is as exact as could be expected from nautical surveys aided by the compass only, and based on determinations of latitude correct to within one-third of a degree, but without any astronomical longitudes. Two parts were still vague, viz., both extremities of the new continent. In the south the cartographers-connected the unexplored lands about the Strait of Magellan with the vague conception of an austral continent of vast extent,2 and this idea was long held. The nautical knowledge of the north did not extend beyond the latitude of 41° N. on the north-west coast and 65° N. on the north-east. The voyages of Mendana, Queiros, and Torres added much to our knowledge of the Pacific Ocean. Many of the islands situated in the great Asiatic archipelago, as far as New Guinea, were 1 Drake’s World Encompassed, Hakluyt Society, p. 87. 2 See Dalrymple, An Historical Collection of Voyages in the South Pacific Ocean, London, 1770 ; Major, Early Voyages to Terra Australis ; Rainaud, Le Continent Austral, 1893. GBOdRArtllCAl. Discoveries op THE ShTMTHIXTH A XI* Kiuhtkrstii CbXTTRIK'* Amcxcr op Votaobi or I>|«ryjTK|IT HU M 164* TM 1764 48 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. \ sited during th • sixteenth century; isolated points of the island-continent which was soon to receive the name of New Holland or Australia were seen, but out of the immense number of scattered Polynesian islands very few had been discovered, and their identification was most uncertain. The geographical work of the sixteenth century was continued, but with less vigour, - ■ triii 4 the seventeenth century. The only considerable result of the investigations made : n the Croat Ocean during the seventeenth century was the discovery by the Dutch navy of th western half of New Holland, from the Gulf of Carpentaria in the north to about the middle of the south coast. Abel Tasman in 1642 showed that Australia and \ in Diemans Land were surrounded by the ocean to the south, but the west coast of Now / aland, which he visited, was believed to be a part of the Great Southern Continent. In the north, hydrographic explorations were continued, always with a view of discovering a shorter route to India. Hudson, in his last vojTage in 1610, found near the 60th parallel the strait now bearing his name; the current coming from the west n i h him suspect the existence of a great inner sea, which was explored by himself, n ’ in the following years (1612-1613) by Thomas Button. William Baffin (1616) hugged the western coast of Greenland as far as lat. 74° N., about 14 degrees higher than the spot reached by Davis, and, continuing to sail northwards in an open sea, he r* ichcd the strait which he named Smith’s Sound, in lat. 78° N. He was unable to proceed further in this direction. Turning south-west, he discovered on the coast, in lat. 7 ; to 76 N. two wide openings, Jones’ Sound and Lancaster Sound, the latter of w 1 h n - played an important part in modern explorations. The name of Baffin’s Bay bi- deservedly been retained for the enclosed sea to which Davis’ Strait leads, and into which open important passages to the Polar Sea, 1; tic middle of the seventeenth century the relations of land and water had been <>L rved directly on two-thirds of the earth’s surface. In the Pacific, the Sandwich I dun b. the Society Islands, the principal islands of the Navigator Archipelago, and the Pit. Wands had been discovered, while the Marquesas, Santa Cruz Islands, and the New II brides hud P cn discovered but lost sight of. The explorations in southern latitudes wer P- numerous, and many people still believed in the existence of a vast continent - unwinding the South Pole, and extending into low latitudes. Half of the south-eastern coast of Australia was not yet known. Wlc n, in 1728, the Russian expedition under Bering passed through the straits which Ik u hi- name, the discovery of the continent of America may be said to have been ‘•'•ropb ‘ ! and the new world stood revealed in its broad and general outlines. Bering m . ; f rtber explorations in the same direction, but after the numerous voyages in the pf<< ding centuries the absence of discoveries for over a century before Cook is surprising. Kv. ry i:c > nti v< cmed to be v. anting among maritime nations at that time. All the regions Prii [ immediate profit to the explorer had been discovered, commercial relations had SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 49 been established, colonies had been founded, countries rich in precious metals had been conquered, and people rested in the enjoyment of wealth. The time had not yet come when civilised and educated nations would thirst for knowledge, and would send their vessels to investigate what still remained unknown regarding the sea. The expedition of Edmund Halley, in 1699, to improve our knowledge concerning longitude and the varia- tion of the compass, was a purely scientific voyage ; still scientific voyages were really initiated at the time of James Cook, in the latter half of the eighteenth century. In the foregoing short account the important additions made to the knowledge of the distribution of land and water during the period under consideration have been indicated. Let us now turn to some other aspects of the science of Oceanography. After Magellan’s voyage of circumnavigation the nomenclature of the sea assumed a modem Nomenclature character, Sebastian Munster, in the first general map in his Cosmography,1 intro- 1 HE °CEANS- duces the following denominations : — Mare Pacificum, Mare Indicum, Mare Sept 07}/^ Munster. trionale applied to the Arctic Ocean, Oceanus Occidentalis applied to the basin of the Atlantic north of the equator, and Mare Aethiopicum to the southern part of the Atlantic. Gerard Mercator, in his famous universal map, replaces the Oceanus Occidentalis of Munster’s maps by Oceanus Atlanticus, corresponding to the North Atlantic, the southern part of the Atlantic is called Oceanus Aethiopicus, and at the western opening of the Strait of Magellan we read El Mar Pacifica} According to Krummel, 3 in the second half of the sixteenth century and beginning of the seventeenth, the term Atlantic was applied: — (1) to the sea lying to the west of Morocco (Munster) ; (2) to the sea to the south-west of Liberia (Munster later) ; (3) to the north-west portion of that ocean (Michael Mercator) ; (4) to the whole of the North Atlantic (Gerard Mercator) ; (5) to the whole Atlantic (Varenius) ; and (6) to the Universal Ocean (Ortelius). Varenius was the first to undertake a critical examination of this nomenclature, and Varenius. he arranged it as follows :4 — (1) The Atlantic Ocean, often called Mare del Nort; this is the sea enclosed between the western coasts of the Old World and the eastern coasts of the New. He divides the Atlantic into two parts, one north and one south of the equator ; in the north this ocean joins the Hyperborean Sea, and in the south the Austral Ocean. (2) The Pacific Ocean {Mare Pacificum ), often given the name of Mare del Zur ; it is situated between America and Asia, and extends its immense 1 Munster, Cosmographia Universalis, Basel, 1544. 2 This Spanish nomenclature, as observed by Krummel (Versuch einer vergleichenden Morphologie der Meeresraume, Leipzig, 1879, p. 3), often used at that period, did not simplify matters. Thus we find a ILr del Nort, sometimes applied to the North Atlantic and sometimes to the whole Atlantic ; a Mar di India, or even a Mar del Zur, standing for the Pacific. Traces of this singular nomenclature still exist in tbe names of two parts of tie Nicaragua Republic, San Juan del Norte (or Greytowr), being situated twenty miles south of San Juan del Sir . 3 Krummel, op. cii., p. 6. 4 Varenius, Geographia generalis in qua affectiones generales telluris explicantur, p. 82, Cambridge, 1 ;72. (summary of results chall. exp. — 1894.) 7 50 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. ir: i. as far as the Indian Isles, the Philippines, and China. (3) The Hyperborean < > >a: ( Oec'-mus Hype rborseus), the north ocean stretching around the Arctic in.''. (4) Ocean hs Australis surrounding the Austral continent, of which the Indian Ocean is only a part. Other geographers, adds Varcnius, divide the ocean into four parts, and adopt the following subdivisions: — (l) The Atlantic, to the north of the ■■{U.itor; (2) the Aethiopian Ocean, to the south of the equator; (3) the Pacific Ocean; uid (4) the Indian Ocean. But he does not seem to attach great importance to this nomenclature; he says: — “Res non est magni momenti ; sequatur quilibet quod ipsi optimum videtur. Magis enim a nostra fictione quam a natura dependet hsec divisio.” It i.' important to note that this is the first time we find the Atlantic subdivided into two parts, as practised in our day. According to Kriimmel, Guillaume Delisle adopted the following designations: — (1) The North Sea for the whole of the Atlantic with the name generally written north of the equator, although in certain maps it ippcars south of the equator; (2) the Indian Ocean ; (3) the South Sea, occasionally calk- : the South Sea or Pacific, sometimes the Great South Sea, but these names always apply to the whole Pacific. l • ( The first attempt to represent the bottom of the sea by isobathic curves is to 1m* found in a map by Philippe Buache in 1737. These isobathic curves are in- i' tu: d to show that certain elevations of the sea-bottom correspond with the orography -f the neighbouring land. In his Essay on Physical Geography,1 published in 1752, he. develops these ideas, which may be summarised as follows : — Aft* ;• the dtluge the summits of the highest mountains formed a small number of i 'lands ; the waters falling, other islands of less altitude soon appeared, but still separated ft'' A'N'D' repeating an idea already expressed by Father Athanasius Kircher, who considered these chains as the “squeletse ossatura globi.” These mountains divide the sea into different basins, which appear to be united merely because the mountains enclosing them are, for the most part, covered with water. The marine valleys are not all equally deep. If the water of the channel separating France from England were withdrawn, a ridge of mountains uniting Dover and Calais would be left uncovered. Were the sea to subside still further, the Scilly Isles and the Isle of Wight would become mountains separated from England by valleys left dry. Were the waters to fall 60 fathoms, England itself would become a huge mountain separated by a valley from Normandy, and the bottom of the channel at its opening, which would then extend from the Isle of Ushant to the Scilly Isles, would become the sea border. Supported by these examples, drawn from a part of the ocean which he had carefully studied, Buache concludes that islands are but the summits of the- highest mountains, and that they are frequently united by other mountains of less altitude, the existence of which has been proved by the sounding-lead. These submarine chains, according to the author, determine the division of the seas, and they are almost invariably the continuation of those we find on land. Buache distinguishes three great seas. He calls the Atlantic the Ocean , and retains the appellation Indian Sea with the meaning attached to it by his predecessors ; he calls the Pacific Ocean the Great Sea ; lastly, he mentions two small frozen seas in the north and south. He divides the three great oceans by means of his submarine mountains into subordinate basins ; thus the Ocean (the Atlantic) includes a sea of the North of the Oceoni, a sea of the North- West, and an Atlantic Sea of the Ocean. The Gulf of Mexico is an annex in the west, as the Mediterranean and Baltic are in the east. All these subdivisions refer to what we now call the North Atlantic. He did not subdivide the South Atlantic, but gives the whole of that part of the Atlantic the name of Southern Ocean of the Ocean . The Indian Sea comprises the Gulf of Arabia, embracing the Red Sea and the Persian and. Arabian Gulfs, the Gulf of Bengal, and the Archipelago of India, limited in the west by the submarine chain uniting the coast mountains of Burmah with the north-west cape of Sumatra, to which belong as a ridge-line the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. He subdivides the Great Ocean into Northern Sea of the Great Ocean, South Sea between the two tropics, and Southern Sea of the Great Ocean. These subdivisions, a? shown by Buache’s map, rest on his supposed submarine chains. This nomenclature 52 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. bid not find favour with scientific or seafaring men, with the exception of the name of “ Great Ocean,” which he gave to the Pacific. T': ir;»l. >t manner of studying the relief of the globe is by dividing the land into tin ge basins, separated by ridges whose infinite ramifications cover the continents with a natural network. Upon this primitive fact the French geographer bases all his th-vrvs of general geography. Doubtless Buache’s ideas are fundamentally true, but th y Lave one fault . like all theories which precede observation, they strain the facts and e> iggcrate the deductions. They arc, nevertheless, a first step in the right direction towards a scientific method, founding geography no longer on an abstract line, but on the real form and relief of each region. Buache’s oceanic nomenclature was soon abandoned, but his conception of submarine mountains found more or less favour with Alex, von Humboldt, Bergman, Kant, Gatterer, Ritter, and Leopold von Buch Borsch, in his work on Orography,1 opposes these ideas, saying : — “The mountains which reach the shore should not be considered as ii- ing united with those running in the same direction in islands or in other continents.” Hiekis h,2 on the other hand, thinks that although this proposition may be correct, it oust not be taken in too absolute a sense, for the chain of mountains in the island of Nova 7/cmbla should be considered as a prolongation of the Ural Mountains. Deep-sea . gs have proved that it is only in the vicinity of continental coasts and islands t ha' the floor of 1 lie sea may be considered as a prolongation of the neighbouring land; the*** soundings have taught us to form a more correct idea of the orography of the sea, and have reduced hypothetical conceptions to their real value. PiroajBn or CAJtroGRArtlT IX the HixTrrrra, SrvnrmxTH, a>p Kicftruvni With the discovery of America and the circumnavigation of Africa a new era opened f«»r navigation. Endeavours were immediately made to find more accurate methods of •crt. lining the position of vessels in the open sea, and more care was bestowed on the C‘»:: -t ruction of charts and the errors of the compass. The voyage of the Astronomer- Royal, Hally, in 1699, was undertaken solely with those objects in view, and was fob o. 1 by the construction of a variation chart, and proposals for finding longitudes from occultations of fixed stars. \S i have seen that the art of drawing up maps was cultivated in the fourteenth and fifto '.tfi centuries by the seafaring nations of the Mediterranean, and marine charts improv. .1 more rapidly than maps of the land. In the sixteenth century this art passed into he hand* of the Spaniards and Portuguese ; about the middle of that century ’ lc German draughtsmen took the lead; towards the end of the sixteenth and during th vent' filth centuries the Dutch and Flemish map-makers flourished, and were after- ward* superseded by the French. 1 Bnneb, Von aebcahriUn de* fatten Landes, inabeuondere von Uebirge, Marburg, 1817, p. 16. ' Hi«-ku