REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION

Ste OVWiew ue - Cr ALS Tle

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE
OF COLOR IN MICE

Bye 2 Ci Cr.) i Spi

WASHINGTON, D. C.

PUBLISHED BY THE CaRNEGIE INSTITUTION oF W asHINGTON

1913

ALBERT R. MANN
LIBRARY

NEw YorK STATE COLLEGES
OF
AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS

AT

CORNELL UNIVERSITY

QH 431.0385". University Library

its explana

WAAL
3 1924 003 057 12

6 nam

Cornell University

The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.

There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.

http://www. archive.org/details/cu31924003057126

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION

By W. E. CASTLE

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE
OF COLOR IN MICE

By Cc. C. LITTLE

WASHINGTON, D. C.

PUBLISHED BY THE CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON

1913

CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON. PuBLicaTion No. 179.

apers Nos. 18 ano 19 oF THE-STATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION at CoLD SPRING
Harsor, New Yors.

Copies of this Book
were first issued

SEP 131913

PRESS OF GIBSON BROTHERS
WASHINGTON, D. C.

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

By W. E. CASTLE,

Professor of Zoology in Harvard University,
Research Associate of the Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Paper No. 18, Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION

In 1905 I showed that when black-coated guinea-pigs of pure race
mated with red-coated ones only black-coated young are ordinarily produc
and that if such young are in turn mated with reds, both black young and
ones are obtained. In other words, black is a mendelian dominant to 1
The fact was, however, noted that occasionally the cross of black with _
causes reversion to the agouti or aide Eu aie may be regarded a
“modified condition of black, since the hairs of the agouti animal contain bl:
pigment, but disposed in a definite pattern with red, the entire hair being bi:
except a terminal or subterminal band of red (or yellow).

An examination of the tables of matings published at that time shows t]
all the agouti animals so produced were the progeny of a single red anin
o'2054. This animal produced black young as well as agouti ones in cros
with black, so it was not clear to what the reversion was due. By a study
the progeny of this animal the matter was later cleared up. The black you
were found never to produce agouti young in crosses with any red anim
unless such reds were descended from o2054. The agoutis, however, produ:
a mixture of agoutis, blacks, and reds, when mated with ordinary red anim:

These and other corroborating experiments, reported briefly in 19
showed that the agouti reversion in crosses of black with red is due to a fac
transmitted by the red parent, never by the b ~ Fe

‘For, as I then show
(ty a red animal “which produces the reversion to oe in crosses with |
black animal will produce it in crosses with any black animal; but (2) no bl:
animal will produce agouti young unless crossed with a red antral which a
produces agouti young in crosses with other black animals.

For simplicity, the something possessed by red animals which indu
reversion, I have called the agouti or A factor. It is invisible in the red anin
since the hairs of such animals are. ered throughout ‘their Jength._ Its only C
severable function is to exclude black from the terminal portion of the_h:
and this function plainly can tot be ‘exercised unless black pigment is prese
Now this agouti factor is transmitted like any other simple independent m
delian factor. Some reds are homozygous in A and so transmit it in all tk
gametes. A very fine female of this sort, kindly loaned me in the summer
1906 by Mr. B. B. Horton, was mated with two different black males (74:
and 6’9538), by each of which she bore five young, all agouti-marked. Th
same males when mated to other red females produced only black young.

Most of the agouti-producing reds which I have had, including the origi
o'2054 (received in June, 1903) and some of his descendants, have been hete
zygous in the agouti factor, so that when mated with black animals they r
duced in approximately equal numbers agouti young and black ones.

3

4 REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

reds which I have had, derived from other sources than these two, have failed
to produce agouti young in crosses with black animals; see the summary in
table 1, p. 8. ‘They may therefore be considered to lack altogether the agouti
factor in which wild species of cavy are regularly homozygous.

The agouti factor is transmitted through albinos exactly as are other color
factors. Accordingly an albino may or may not possess and transmit the
agouti factor; if it does possess this factor, it will produce agouti offspring
when crossed with a black animal. Several examples of this have been ob-
served among the albino descendants of 2054. Thus red 073496, table 1,
which when mated with heterozygous black females produced red young and
black ones but no agoutis, when later mated with the albino females 4270 and
4262 produced 4 red and 4 agouti young. The father of these albinos, it should
be said, was an agouti animal.

Agouti animals produced by crossing black with red do not breed true.
They produce three classes of young if bred with each other or with ordinary
reds. The latter form of test has been more commonly employed in my experi-
ments because I had more red animals than agoutis and it was easier to ascer-
tain their gametic composition. Fourteen young, however, were obtained from
the mating of F; agoutis inter se; they were 2 red, 2 black, and 10 agouti; see
table 2, p.9. The mating with reds produced 111 red, 45 black, and 40 agouti;
expected, 98:49:49. This expectation is calculated as follows: It is expected
that half the young will be red because the agouti parent is known to be hetero-
zygous for red. It is also expected that half the young will receive the agouti
character, which those possessing black pigment will show, but which those
possessing only red pigment will not show. Hence all the reds should look
alike, but half the others should be agouti. In the mating inter se of agoutis
of this generation the expectation is 4 red :3 black :9 agouti; the observed
numbers, as stated, are 2:2:10, in a slightly smaller total, 14. The tests
summarized above relate to five different F, reversionary agouti males. Three
of them were descendants of my original red male, 2054; the other two (9150
and 9152) were sons of Horton’s red female. All gave similar results.

Agouti young produced by the mating already described of an F; rever-
sionary agouti with an ordinary red produced the same kinds of young as did
the F, agoutis, viz, red, black, and agouti; see the second division of table 2.
The tests applied in this case were identical in character with those applied to
the previous generation, viz, matings inter se and with ordinary reds (lacking
A). Twenty-four different male animals were tested in one or both of these
ways, while several females were tested in the first-mentioned way. The data
for these are recorded for convenience in connection with the male involved in
the same experiment. Only two of the various animals tested failed to pro-
duce all three classes of young. In the case of these two, 9602 and 9685, there
can be little doubt that a more extended test would have produced the missing
class. Male 9602 produced 2 black young and 1 agouti. A further test would
almost certainly have given red young, since his mother was red. Male 9685
produced 4 red young and 2 black ones. That he could also have produced

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. 5

agouti young can scarcely be questioned, since he was himself an agouti. The
total progeny of the 24 males by red females is 133 red, 66 black, and 69 agouti,
the expectation being 134 :67 :67. By agouti mates they produced 25 red,
21 black, and 63 agouti young, the expectation being 27 : 21:61. These are
remarkably close agreements. One of the 24 males, 7932, was also mated
with a black female, producing 2 black and 2 agouti young, the expected
equality; no red young were to be expected.

Agouti animals produced by mating agouti animals inter se are not so
uniform in behavior as those thus far discussed. Experiment shows that they
fall into four groups:

I. Agoutis producing red, black, and agouti young.
II. Agoutis producing only red and agouti young.

III. Agoutis producing only black young and agouti young.

IV. Agoutis producing only agouti young.

Group I is represented by nine agouti males, whose parents were both
agoutis; they were enumerated in the third division of table 2. Together they
have produced (a) by red mates, 34 red, 20 black, and 19 agouti young; expected
36:18:18; (6) by agouti mates, 3 red, 5 black, and 14 agouti young; expected
5 :4:12, if the females were of the same character as the males, as most of
them doubtless were; (c) by black mates, 3 black and 3 agouti young, the ex-
pected equality, no reds being expected.

Group II is represented by the ten animals enumerated in table 3. They
proved to be incapable of producing black young in any sort of mating. Mani-
festly they were homogyzous in agouti. By red mates they produced 53 red
and 52 agouti young. They were accordingly heterozygous in red, and equality
of red and agouti young was tobe expected. By agouti mates they produced
13 red and 62 agouti young. The expectation in this case varies with the
character of the agouti mate employed, which was not in every case definitely
determined. If the agouti mate belongs in Group I or II, then the expec-
tation is 1 red :3 agouti; but if the mate belongs in Group III or IV, the
expectation is all agouti young. If the mates are a mixture of the two sorts,
as a random group of fF; agoutis should be, then the expectation lies between
75 and 100 per cent agoutis; the percentage obtained is 82.66. By black
mates, the Group II agoutis produced 18 young, all agouti, as expected. These
were sired by two animals, both of which by red mates had produced red
young as well as agouti young.

Group III is represented by the 16 tested animals enumerated in table 4.
They were incapable of producing red young, and hence were homozygous in
black. But since théy produced black young as well as agouti, it is evident
that they were not homozygous in agouti. Three females (374,437, and 462)
are included only provisionally in this group, since they were not tested by
matings with red animals, but only with black ones. They are known to have
produced black young, but it is not certain that they could not also have pro-
duced red young, in which case they would fall in Group I. The test in the
case of several other animals (as 5, 68, and 314) rests upon too small numbers

6 REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

to be conclusive, but suffices to show that the animals in question were not in
all respects homozygous, the condition it was desired to obtain in the experi-
ment. These animals were therefore promptly discarded as soon as evidence
was obtained that they produced other than agouti young. In the case of
animals 191, 6197, 7894, 8020, and 9939, the numbers of young are sufficiently
large to establish beyond question their position in Group ITI.

The animals included in table 4 together have produced by red mates 51
black and 91 agouti young. If all the red mates used lacked the agouti factor,
we should expect equality of black and agouti young; but from this expecta-
tion we observe a considerable divergence. It is quite possible that in some
of these tests red animals were used which were descended from 2054 and
had inherited from him an unseen agouti factor, for in making the later tests
some such animals were employed, but it is doubtful whether this accounts
for the whole discrepancy, amounting to about 14 per cent. This doubt is
strengthened by the similar discrepancy observed in the tests with black mates,
where we expect equality of black and agouti, but obtain 5 and 12 respectively.
The case of animal 191 looks suspicious; he produced only one black young one
in a total of 22, yet the record is certainly accurate. We had provisionally pro-
nounced him a pure agouti, when the single black young one came which places
him in Group III. It seems doubtful whether the theoretical 50 per cent of
his gametes were entirely free from the agouti character. If so, such gametes
would seem to have been deficient in vitality. The deviation is, however, not
an impossible chance result, though it seems improbable. I regret that this
animal was not more extensively tested. The matings of animals of Group
III with other agouti animals produced 9 black and 46 agouti young, or 84 per
cent agouti, where we expect between 75 and 100 per cent.

Agouti animals of Group IV are included in table 5. They represent the
“fully fixed’? agouti type breeding exactly like a pure wild species as regards
color. Two thoroughly tested animals belong here beyond question, o145
and 0316; two others less fully tested belong here in all probability, viz, 160
and 0181, while 9 473 is included as a possibly pure animal. She was fully
tested qualitatively (by a mating with a brown-eyed yellow animal known to
lack both black and agouti), but the number of young obtained is not large
enough to make the test conclusive. Similar tests of other females might be
included in the table, but they would add nothing to the demonstrative case
of #145, which shows that the reversionary character obtained by crossing
can be obtained in a homozygous, pure condition, as it occurs in wild species.
The five animals enumerated in table 5 have produced only agouti young: (a)
by red mates, 52; (b) by agouti mates, 135; (c) by black mates, 26.

The occurrence of four different types of F2 agoutis indicates that the F,
agoutis, their parents, were heterozygous asregards two independent mendelian
unit-characters, in agreement with the interpretation already given. These
two characters are: (1) black-pigmented fur; (2) the agouti pattern (visible
only in black-pigmented animals). Designating these two units as B and A
respectively, the F, agoutis are all of the formula AB (heterozygous in both

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. 7

units). Their gametes are AB, A,B,O. Ifananimal producing such gametes
is mated with a red animal lacking both units, the zygotes formed would be,
as regards these units, AB, A, B, and O, or agouti, red, black and red respec-
tively, or collectively 2 reds : 1 black :1 agouti, as obtained (table 2). Further,
such agoutis as came from this cross would be identical in character with the
F, agoutis. This expectation is confirmed by table 2, second division.

But if the F agoutis are mated inter se, then we expect to get zygotes
corresponding with the product of two sets of gametes, each AB-++A+B +0,
that is A, Bo* +24.B +2AB,+44B +24 +2B+4+4A,.+B,+0. In appearance
these zygotes would fall into three classes, agouti, black, and red, as shown in
the accompanying table.

The agoutis in this (F2) generation, it will be noticed, should be of four
different types, as actually observed. The AB group should produce all three
sorts of young, agouti, black, and red, being
heterozygous in both characters, A and B.
The group designated by A:B would be pure
for A but heterozygous for B. All their young Agouti. Black. | Red.
would be potentially agoutis, but since part
of them would lack black pigment, such would 4
be red. Hence they would produce only the 2
two sorts of young, agoutiand red; see table 3. 2 ABs
The group designated by AB» would transmit
black pigment to all their young, but only part
of these would receive A. Hence they would
produce agouti young and black ones, but
no reds; compare table 4.

The group A2Be would transmit both black and agouti to all their young;
hence they would produce nothing but agouti young, however mated; com-
pare table 5. The expected proportions of these four groups of agouti animals
are obviously 4 :2:2:1. The numbers shown in the tables are 9:10: 16:5.
The apparent deficiency of individuals in Group I and excess in Groups II and
ITI is readily accounted for. Not all the agoutis recorded as derived from an
agouti X agouti cross were second-generation agoutis; many of them were third-
generation agoutis, having been obtained from two successive matings of
agouti with agouti. In that case one or both of their parents may have been
of Groups IT or III, in which case the expectation for young of those groups is
increased, while that for Group I is correspondingly diminished. Therefore
both the kinds of agoutis obtained in the experiment and their numerical pro-
portions are in harmony with the hypothesis presented in this paper.

*The subscript 2 is used (instead of the algebraic exponent 2) to indicate double rep-
resentation of a factor, 7. e., a homozygous condition as regards it. (See Castle, 1909.)

8 REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

SUMMARY.

1. The agouti coat characteristic of wild cavies and of most other wild
rodents is dependent upon the presence in the fur of black pigment disposed
in a definite pattern with red (or yellow).

2. The factors which control, respectively, the development of black pig-
ment and the production of the agouti pattern are independent of each other.

3. The agouti coat is obtained only when both these factors are possessed
by an individual.

4. Only such agouti individuals as are homozygous in both factors breed
true under all circumstances.

5. An agouti animal which is homozygous in A (the agouti factor), but
heterozygous in B (black pigmentation), may produce agouti young and red
ones, but not black.

6. An agouti animal which is homozygous in B but heterozygous in A
may produce agouti young and black ones, but not red.

7. An agouti animal heterozygous in both A and B may produce three
sorts of young, agouti, red, and black. All F; (reversionary) agoutis produced
by crossing black with red are of this sort. Agoutis of the other three sorts are
obtained only in the second or later generations of agouti young.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Castie, W. E., 1905. Heredity of coat-characters in guinea-pigs and rabbits. Carnegie
Institution of Washington Publication No. 23.

1907. On a case of reversion induced by cross-breeding and its fixation. Science,
N.5&., vol. 25, p. 151.

1907a. The production and fixation of new breeds. Proc. Am. Breeders’ Associ-
ation, vol. 3, p. 34.

TaB_e 1.—Differences among red guinea-pigs as regards the transmission of agouti.

Young by Young by
ey heterozygous | homozygous
‘i black mates. | black mates.

Young by
agouti mates.

R | B|Ag| R|} Bl/|Ag| R| Bl] Ag| R | Bl Ag

I. Homozygous in A.

¢@ Horton’s red............... sssdve [Evieahs le dedys| Shea mica cloned) OS) “OW AOttce sl aoe sae
II. Heterozygous in A.

(egy) ts: Sere eee re eer 10; O| O} 3; 1] 2} O} 3] 1] 0; 1] 9

91278, daughter of o’2054....)....)....).... 2] OF Lio help.

91280, 91281, daughters of

2054 ves sient hu dees en imseleveale<ss| LOL 8 | 6},

III. Lacking A

OO847s . 22 605 salen Sd gene eactee oes ocseelee ad LS 8 | Ohl:

SF Q004 So arcs Sapna HR Sade ects 44} 0; 0] 20,12; O}.

OBA IG is saw e eres wane aes wis 22 blew |ede eh CONTE | Ole

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

TABLE 2.—Agouti parents producing red young, black young, and agouti young.

Young by Young by Young by
red mothers. |agouti mothers. | black mothers.

R|B/|Ag| RR} B/|Ag| R | B | Ag

NWA hy

Onorr

a
we
oo
a
a

DOr OR NED
ROD RR WORD

34
278

i)
o
oO
oo
oO
_
~
o
wo
Cty

_
oo
=
a
iS
oo
oo
o
i]
oo
oo
xq
Oo
o
on

Tasie 3.—Agouti parents producing only red young and agouti young.

Young by Young by Young by
red mates. agouti mates. | black mates.

R| B\Ag| R| Bl Ag| R| B| Ag

From agouti X agouti cross:
26 oe

a
ANN Oo be

o};}oooooo0oooo

on
oo

10

REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION.

TaBLe 4.—Agouti parents producing only black young and agouti young.

From agouti X agouti cross:
a5

Young by Young by Young by
red mates. agouti mates. | black mates.
Rj|Bs|Ag| Rj; Bl Ag!| R| B| Ag

i

romNotasl

oO
an
a

TaBLE 5.—Agouti parents producing only agouti young.

Young by Young by Young by
red mates. agouti mates. | black mates.
R| B}|Ag|R | B | Ag| R | Bl Ag
From agouti X agouti cross:
0145 0 0} 21 0 0! 68 0 0; 16
0 0 6 0 0 Bs va wallets al parece
0 0 8 0 0 (lipase Reto
0 0] 14 0 0} 57 0 0}; 10
0 0 8 |weeaels oxcules exafeae vsiieen alewiees
o| of 52] 0 0/135] of] o| 26

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE OF
COLOR IN MICE.

By C. C. LITTLE,

Research Assistant in Genetics in the Bussey Institution of Harvard University.

Paper No. 19, Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

11

PREFATORY NOTE.

The experiments on which the following paper is based were begun in
the Zoological Laboratory of Harvard University at Cambridge, Massachu-
setts, in November 1907. Since that time more than 10,500 young have
been recorded. In 1909 the animals were moved to the Laboratory of Gen-
etics at the Bussey Institution, Forest Hills, Massachusetts, at which place the
experiments are still in progress.

Throughout the course of the experiments the writer has been encouraged,
aided, and advised by Dr. William E. Castle, to whom any merit that this
paper may possess is chiefly due.

The skillful and accurate representations of the various color varieties are
from water-color paintings from life, by Mr. Eugene N. Fischer, whose interest
has shown itself in the excellent work that he has done.

The experiments have been supported in part by an annual grant from the
Carnegie Institution of Washington made to Dr. Castle ‘‘for the continuation
of the study of heredity in small mammals.”

CLARENCE C, LitTLeE.

May 1912.
12

CONTENTS.

Part I. Tur Factors Propuctna Cotor in Mice.

Page

Formative and distributive color factors. ..........0..00 0.00 cece cette 18

Location of pigmentycccasx sins 5 sees bao be OME TE Rede SER RASH ECA BR Oe HEINER eS 19

Hormative colorfactorsise:. oo. .asuteotidunes eoga aesdes sabres cep Sawumesines da wa 19

1. The general color factor, Y................... ea A Haile Ace CUR ahaee Rul ncaa 19

2. The brown-producing color factor, Bro... . 0... ees 21

3. The black-producing color factor, B... 2.1... 2. cee 21

Distributive color factors... 2.0.0.0... 0. cece eee nent teen nees 22

4, The distributive factor, D.... 0.0... 26 teens 24

5. The distributive factor, Po... 0.2... 27

6. The distributive factor, A... 2... eect teen eens 30

7. The distributive factor, Re « v<4us ie eals ee Bos OSA SEE AD Lege eR EEE OS ORES 31

8. Sooty yellows and sables.. 6.0.0.0... eect tenes 34

The inheritance of spotting.........0..0.0..0 00 0c cece tect eee eae 38

Crosses with Japanese waltzing mice........... 00. 43

Association of characters. soc <sicag etalgen picu sega eneg een gre peeeiad en saga Paes e 44
Part II. Exprrmentat Data.

Hxplanation-of symbols: os.c08cy ca neeadavins ee Pe4 Reds ei ae hae te Beto 47

Color varieties-of mites «<< cig ase cu ae da ches Oe ae hae ASN a A aw ge eRe we ane alee 49

LXTENDED: SERIES: 6 + hoses Gees oes aa eat Mesa eRe aes MAME eee ae ak eee 50

L.. Black agouti, ‘Gigs Wenge ccc cover aia d Bea de nteaense ye 6a wk Dew ene 50

Black agouti x black agouti... 2... tenes 50

Black agouti x dilute black agouti...........0.00 0.0... cece ee eee 51

Black agouti x brown agouti... 2.2.0... eet eee 52

Black’agoutiscblacks io. peace vec assis ougives ster pas eae y adel se a 53

Black agoutixc browns. 3-96 ¢< ees set ca cd roa Oe eee eM Seabed a 54

Black agouti x dilute brown. ............ 0. 0c ccc eee nee 55

Black agouti x pink-eyed brown................000 cece eee ees 56

Black agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown................ 2000200000 56

Tl: Dilute black agoutt (fig 2) is 2¢.-2000seyas ashore cas deens dh each eense 56

Dilute black agouti x dilute black agouti....................00005 56

Dilute black agouti x black....... 00.000 eee eee 57

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black.......... 0.0.0... cee eee 57

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute black...................... 57

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti...................... 57

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute black agouti................ 57

Dilute black agouti X brown.......... 00. eee 58

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown..................... 58

III. Pink-eyed black agouti (fig. 3)....... 0c eee ees 59

Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti.................. 59

Pink-eyed black agouti x black... 00.0.0... cece ee eee 59

Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed black... ................000.. 60

Pink-eyed black agouti x dilute black......................00008. 60

Pink-eyed black agouti x dilute brown agouti..................... 60

Pink-eyed black agouti x brown............. 0000s 61

14 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

EXTENDED SER1Es—Continued.
IV. Pink-eyed dilute black agouti (fig. 4). 0... 0... c cece eee eens
V. Brown agouti (fig. 5)... eee eee een ees
Brown agouti x brown agouti... 1.6.0... eee ee eee eee
Brown agouti x pink-eyed brown agouti............. 0. cece eee eee
Brown agouti brown’... 0.6. 6.02.0 ees ek eee ee eee ese een ge eben
Brown agouti x pink-eyed brown... .......0...5. 0000 c eee eee eee eee
Brown agouti x dilute black... 0.0... eee nee a
Brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown................00 0000000.
VI. Dilute brown agouti (fig. 6)... 0.00.
Dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti..............
Dilute brown agouti X brown. ..........00 0. cee eee eee eee ee
VII. Pink-eyed brown agouti (fig. 7)...... 0.0 eee teens
Pink-eyed brown agouti x pink-eyed brown agouti.................
Pink-eyed brown agouti x brown. ........... 000 cee ees
VIII. Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti (fig. 8)........... 0c cee
Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti......
Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti x dilute brown...................0.
TX, Block: (ig: 9) 2 seeing os aysioeyteeeuad Sense Ayan ete see aes oo bs ea ROS Ot
Black x¢black. 2 c.6 eee dase oF aay bs Ral oe ORE SU SE Eee AE a ee a
Black sdilute blak cso. oc ata dg hg O barat s cea ehadueiy MeRRE A ola
Black x pink-eyed black. ....... 0.0.00... cece eee
Black Sébrowni ass ake cts sec eawE ne Ce ee one Re teeta eadiees
Black x pink-eyed brown... 2.0.0... 00.00.00 cece cece eee ee
Black x pink-eyed dilute brown. .............0.....0 000 e eee eee
XR Dilite black Che. WO) sen ca eons nad ds Rh AA AGW Oe oN. Real el
Dilute black x dilute black ....... eee
Dilute black x pink-eyed black. ........... 000. e eee ee
Dilute black: browns. iic:0 pan ietv tie Sn He Go ee oe ae BBE Gas
Dilute black x pink-eyed brown... .............0.0. 00 cece eens
ML... Pinkseyed. black: (i. WL) s.r seve ov eka eens Coe owes de eee ewes
Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed black. ..........0 0.00. e eee eee ee eee
Pink-eyed black x brown... 1.2.0.0... 000 c cece eect eee tees
Pink-eyed black x dilute brown... ..........000 00 cee eee teenies
Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed brown. .......... 0... cece eee eee
XII. Pink-eyed dilute black (fig. 12). 0.0.0.0... 0.000 cee een ee
Pink-eyed dilute black x brown... .......0..0 000. e eee
Pink-eyed dilute black x dilute brown................0.0.02 00000
ATES. Broteric Ges 13) sss se 5 doaca co ved teas blo eon ie be RCA a WR Swed MU a ede AOE
BrOWD X DIOWA: sakavsngsedece pret Ayaed tata eooRe emer AeS
Brown x pink-eyed brown. ......0...0 0.00 cece ccc eee
Brown x pink-eyed dilute brown... .......... 0.0 cece cee tenes
XIV. Dilute brown (fig. 14)...0.0 0000 cc eee eee
Dilute brown x pink-eyed brown. ........ 00.0000. 0c cence ee ees
XV. Pink-eyed brown (fig. 15)... 0000000000 ccc ccc cece eee
Pink-eyed brown x pink-eyed brown...............00 0.00 eve eueee
Pink-eyed brown x albino. 2.2.2.0... 00.0006 cece ccc neces
XVI. Pink-eyed dilute brown (fig. 16)......0.00.00 0000 c eee cece eee

RESTRICTED ISERIES xcisa% za: ode eit da dug ha eu do bee Dd GALE poate ah da ROM EAONG eo Os
(a) Dark-eyed intense series ..... 00. cece teen eevee aas
XVII. Black-eyed yellow carrying agouti..........................

XVIII. Black-eyed yellow without agouti (fig.17)..............0.....

CONTENTS. 15

Resrrictep Serres—Continued. Pago.
(b) Pink-eyed intense series. .... 0. ccc ccc ccc ccc cee eee eee e enn neneeee 78
XXI. Pink-eyed yellow carrying black agouti..................... 78

XXII. Pink-eyed yellow carrying black............ 0.0... c cece eee 78
XXIII. Pink-eyed yellow carrying brown agouti.................... 78
XXIV. Pink-eyed yellow carrying brown.................. 0s eee eee 78

(c) Dark-eyed dilute series... 0.0... 0c e nent eeeeeens 78
XXV. Black-eyed dilute yellow carrying agouti..................... 78
XXXVI. Black-eyed dilute yellow without agouti.................... 78
XXVII. Brown-eyed dilute yellow carrying agouti................... 78
XXVIII. Brown-eyed dilute yellow without agouti (fig. 19)............ 78

(d) Pink-eyed dilute series... 0... ccc cece ene e nett nnnes 78
XXIX. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying black agouti................ 78
XXX. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying black....................4. 78
XXXI. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying brown agouti............... 78
XXXII. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying brown..................... 78
Yellow x yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young.............. 80

Sooty yellow x sooty yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young... . 81

Cream x cream, giving only dark-eyed intense young.............. 81

Yellow x cream, giving only dark-eyed intense young.............. 82

Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young......... 82.

Yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed young 83
Sooty yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed

YOUNG s sau isgesseset eg eee ese sees take eu deed ee eS 83
Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed and pink-eyed

VOUNL 6 sa eter pana Od te eRe Male Re ae WL aGa ne ROED GaSe Cas 84
Yellow x yellow, miscellaneous............... 0.00 cece cece neces 84
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed young......... 84
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young... . 84
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed

SOU Goorin cclinmuona % SecnasAelecnaae easaasin & anspaGe Gace eatemae ie tanthe Mica tah 84
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-

VOC YOUN 3 Sic sa uaace yavedsurn nae Rae er eace ashame ane See enelabensty 85
Yellow x dilutesooty yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 85
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed young...... 85

Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. 85
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense pink-eyed and dark-eyed

YOUNG vic rald sepsis nee ey tes Peace Vos ka aa Gre Rew nade Fes 85
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and

pink=eyed syOung ees cscs Gade nddice iwiardatt og nace bane ailuen Bie das 86
Cream x pink-eyed yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young..... 86
Yellow x black agouti, giving only dark-eyed intense young......... 87
Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. ... 87
Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-

OV EUV OUNG 65 As wlah daisies darjandl oie wea Maeva Sea shay ad dined Sd aes aaa 87
Cream x black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young......... 87
Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young..... 88

Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 88
Cream x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 88
Sooty yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-

CV CR YOUNG bcs cong agave ie ce Seana any lp tea teerew ata 88
Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young. 88
Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed

16 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Restricrep Srrres—Continued. Page.
(d) Pink-eyed dilute series—Continued.
Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed

and pink-eyed young. ...... 2.6... e cece cette eee e nee ees 89
Yellow x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young............... 89
Yellow x black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young......... 91
Yellow x black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young........ 91
Cream x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young............... 92
Cream x dilute black, giving only intense dark-eyed young......... 92
Yellow x dilute black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. ... 92
Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only intense dark-eyed young..... 92
Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed

VOUN GH each ds ail etal be sch mab a AG eae aber dg aia sama ase anduaue 92
Cream x pink-eyed black, giving only intense dark-eyed young...... 93
Yellow x brown agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young........ 93
Yellow x brown agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young... 94
Dilute yellow x dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young... . 95
Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed

VOUM G'S: 4 clus seb ukiicuiannrege We aioe ato alnvaiee den arene Medeaet aan 95
Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed

and pink-eyed young............ 0.0.0 c cece eee e eee e eens 95
Dilute yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed

VOU Bios iee ete ta ieee Seep Seg dod Sat eg Said te ae OA A Qa 96
Dilute yellow x wild black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young... 96
Dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed young. . 96

Dilute yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving only dilute dark-eyed young 96
Dilute sooty yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and

pink=ey ed. YOUN es dia yvale vaya hcg ie a a siete ang gansne aiah gee eae waar 97
Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense pink-eyed

OUI Bak a, ontvesdice asin osesdewdveoqayod acd aan aier bad searwi dia Sreeavasdiete bahay ss 97
Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-

CVed VOUNEH ccc siavciwisvata seein eget Saad cama eee eeeeien 97
Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute

pink=eyed young... eines bee onc ee ye dea tow sees ORE Es 97
Pink-eyed yellow x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-

CV CR YOUNES oe cade Geis as aon Wek Omran ahe ge OA 98
Pink-eyed yellow x dilute black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed

and pink-eyed young.......... 0... cece eee eee eens 98
Pink-eyed yellow x brown, giving intense dark-eyed young......... 98
Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense pink-

CY Eds YOUNES. ooh; cee cians ete Goo ae ek) Ga ae MAE wae Reaeod S 98
Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed brown agouti, giving only intense pink-

6yed YOUNES nov dade caal be ecw ease ee eRe ae Tee O OEE Bele 98

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only intense pink-eyed young 99
Pink-eyed dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed

and dilute pink-eyed young............. 0... cece ene eee eens 99
Pink-eyed dilute yellow x black, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed

and pink-eyed young.......... 0. cece cece eect eee eeeae 99
Albinos x pink-eyed brown........... 0. cee cece cece cece eee eens 100
Albinos x pink-eyed dilute brown........ 0.0... c sees ee eee e eens 100

BiDHORTADBY sic yc mache ats ge IG wie haa en Sede hk Gide Baal aAe laraidh gsh 4 isla den BR 101

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE OF
COLOR IN MICE.

PART |.
THE FACTORS PRODUCING COLOR IN MICE.

In the coat of the common house mouse (Mus musculus) three pigments are
recognizable, yellow, brown, and black. No connecting intergradations of color
between these three types are visible. The inheritance of these colors and of
their distribution, both qualitatively and quantitatively, has been the object
of many investigations and is the principal feature of the present paper.

All mammalian color has been found due to melanin pigment. Riddle
(1909) has discussed the process of the formation of melanin pigment and states
that all chemical evidence supports the idea that melanin pigment is the
product of an oxidation process. The substances (chromogens) on which the
oxidizing agents (enzymes) act were found to be tyrosin and certain related
aromatic compounds. It hasbeen further shown that tyrosinase-like ferments,
which occur widely distributed in the organism, act as oxidizing agents, thus
producing melanin compounds. Furthermore, it has been proved that at least
artificial melanins may pass through a series of colors before arriving at the
final stage of oxidation. In such series the earlier stages of oxidation give lighter
colors than the later ones.

Cuénot (1903) advanced an hypothesis to explain the formation of color
by the interaction of a chromogen substance and an enzyme. He called the
chromogen the general factor for the production of color, C, and supposed that
in albinos this chromogen substance is lacking, thus making it impossible for
color to be formed. Riddle, however, states that the nature of the chromogen,
it being very widely distributed throughout the organism, is such that any
theory postulating the absence of this substance would be chemically absurd.
Gortner (1912), however, finds evidence that chromogens in insects may be of
restricted distribution, thus forming color patterns.

At present it is impossible to decide finally between the explanation offered
by Cuénot and that suggested by Riddle. We shall have to await further
chemical evidence to determine whether the albino does or does not lack the
oxidizable substance or substances necessary for pigment production.*

If we assume that there is only one enzyme present to act as an oxidizing
agent, we must assume for it as many different degrees of activity as are re-
quired to explain the occurrence of the various colors known to mendelize (three
in mice, yellow, brown, and black). If we assume that a different enzyme or

*A recent paper by Keeble and Armstrong (1912) has shown that in Primula sinensis
lack of chromogen seems tobe the cause of albinism, thus favoring the original hypothesis
of Cuénot. ie

18 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

group of enzymes is responsible for the production of each pigment we must
suppose that in mice at least three such enzymes or groups of enzymes exist.
To determine which of these conditions occurs in mice is not a problem for the
biologist, but for the chemist. The biologist must confine his attention to
determining the number of distinct agencies at work in pigment formation
irrespective of their chemical nature. These agencies, because of their physio-
logical behavior, the biologist chooses to call “factors,” and attempts to learn
what he can about their functions in the evolution of color varieties.

FORMATIVE AND DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS.

As has already been stated, three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) are
observable in mice. Yellow has been found, by Riddle, to be the lowest in the
scale of mammalian pigments. Nevertheless, in mice no case has been recorded
where yellow alone is present. The eye always has, in addition, brown or
black pigment granules, while in many cases both are present. The same fact
holds good for the coat, so far as observation goes.

These three pigments—yellow, brown, and black—are, however, discon-
tinuous stages. If they are not the products of distinct enzymes they are the
result of distinct grades of activity of a single enzyme. Which of these conditions
holds makes no difference at present, so we may, for purposes of discussion,
refer their causation to three distinct factors, Y for yellow, Br for brown, and
B for black.

Certain animals possess yellow and brown pigment to the exclusion of
black. In such animals, with no evidence of variation in the total amount of
pigmentation, there occur varieties in which the proportion of brown to yel-
low in the coat varies greatly. As the brown increases in amount the yellow
decreases. It is fair, then, to assume that something is acting to convert the
lower-grade pigment (yellow) into the higher grade (brown). This, we suppose,
is the factor Br already mentioned.

The activity of such a factor may, however, be affected by other factors
which determine the amount of brown formed and its location. Experiment
shows that these assumed factors governing the development of brown are
independent of the brown-forming factor Br, for they can be transferred without
visible alteration to animals with black, and vice versa. Such factors we may
call distributive.

Black is the highest grade of mammalian pigment and doubtless, as Riddle
states, is a higher oxidation stage of brown; for brown pigment is often, if not
always, seen in black animals, but never the reverse. We may, therefore,
assume a distinct agency for the conversion of brown into black and call this
factor B. If by a given cross this factor B is added to a certain distributional
stage of brown, the corresponding distributional stage of black is obtained,
showing that the factor B is independent of the distributive factors.

Such factors as Y, Br, and B, indicating as they do distinct qualitative
steps in pigment formation, we may call formative factors, in somewhat the
same way as the factors controlling the distribution and amount of pigment
have been considered distributive factors.

FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS. 19

LOCATION OF PIGMENT.

In wild mammals all three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) commonly
occur in the same hair. In many domesticated or ‘“‘fancy” varieties, one or
the other pigment prevails almost, if not quite, to the exclusion of the others;
thus yellow, brown, and black varieties arise. Brown varieties (completely
lacking black) occur in certain mammals (e. g., mice, rabbits, guinea-pigs,
and dogs). Theoretically they would seem to be possible in all.

Pigment appears in mice in three general regions. These are the eyes, the
skin, and the hair. The pigment occurs in granules.

In the eyes microscopic examination has shown that the pigment granules
are located in both the retina and the iris. Of these two localities the iris
seems the more permanent pigment-producing center; for when reduction in
the amount of pigment occurs the retina seems the more easily and extensively
affected.

In the skin the pigment is located only a short distance from the surface
in the malpighian layer. In contradistinction to the eyes, which are visibly
pigmented at birth, the skin apparently becomes pigmented only after the
animal is several days old; this is largely because the hairs, in which much of
the pigment lies, are not formed at birth. The pigment granules of the hair
may be clearly observed under the microscope. Bateson (1903), among other
investigators, has determined their location with considerable accuracy and
finds that they are situated in the cortex or outer sheath of the hair, and also
in the interior of the hair in the proximal walls of the medullary spaces.

To recapitulate, we find three general pigment-producing regions in mice:
the eye, the skin, and the hair. The pigments (melanins) produced are limited
to three: yellow, brown, and black—which we consider to be caused by the
action (jointly or severally) of the factors Y, Br, and B. Domesticated or
“fancy” varieties of mice appear to differ from the wild in the partial or com-
plete exclusion of one or more of the pigments. Such exclusion may be the
result of (1) the action of a distributive factor, or (2) the loss of the formative
factor necessary to the production of a particular pigment.

FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS.
1. Tue GENERAL Cotor Facror, Y.

It has long been recognized by investigators that, in mice, pigmented vari-
eties differ from albinos by a single mendelian unit-character. Thus in crosses
between homozygous self-pigmented and albino animals we find that the first
generation (F;) consists entirely of pigmented animals. If these first-genera-
tion hybrids be then crossed inter se we should expect in F: that the ratio 3
pigmented young to 1 albino would be approximated. The experimental results
agree well with this expectation and we have asaresult of crossing F; inter se:

Pigmented. | Albino.

Observed.. 598 206
Expected. . 603 201

20 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

If we consider, in addition to the above result, those obtained in a similar
cross by other investigators, we may construct the following table:

Pigmented.| Albino.
Alena) i.¢ agieindaetned 240 97
Crampe. ai 164 57
Cuénot.... 269 93
Darbishire. . 418 137
Durham..... 808 255
von Guaita...... ach 232 77
Parsons-Copeman’*..... 49 14
TAttles o 4 Awdsieand ages’ 598 206
Total observed. . 2,778 936

Expected........ 2,785.5 928.5

*See Bateson (1903).

In the cross between the heterozygous pigmented animals obtained in F;
and pure albinos, where equality of pigmented and albino young is expected,
the following result has been obtained:

| Pigmented. | Albino.

Observed..... 21 16
Expected...... 18.5

As this cross has been largely neglected in my experiments the numbers are
extremely small. If, however, a table is made showing the work of other inves-
tigators, larger and more valuable results are obtained:

Pigmented.| Albino.
Allen. ........0000 000s 84 64
Darbishire............ 106 119
Durham co dsscacucace ons 31 33
von Guaita............ 24 20
Parsons-Copeman...... 59 59
Littles sess unomesve as 21 16
Total observed.. 325 311
Expected........ 318 318

All investigators have found that when albino mice are crossed inter_se,
only albino young are produced. Albinism is, then, a recessive. , charact eter.
Cuénot (1903) considered albinism due to the loss of the general color factor
C (chromogen), but for the reasons given by Riddle this interpretation seems
of doubtful validity.

As before stated, mammalian pigment results from the action of an enzyme
or enzymes upon a chromogen substance. Albinos are formed from colored
varieties by the loss or restriction of one of these substances. Present chemical
evidence discredits the possible loss of the chromogen; the enzyme or enzymes
remain to be considered. Albinos probably lack one or more of these. If

FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS. 21

further chemical investigation should show that what albinos lack is really
chromogen, as Cuénot supposed, no change in the gametic formule here used
will be necessary, beyond the addition of a symbol C' (chromogen) in the case
of colored animals.

In the writer’s opinion the only enzyme which all albinos in common lack is
that which acting alone produces the lowest grade of melanin pigment, namely,
yellow. To this supposed factor I have given the designation Y. The factor
B may or may not be present in an albino, but Br apparently is never lost.
Y then forms the step between color and no color, producing yellow when pres-
ent, no color being produced in its absence. This yellow is converted to brown
pigment by the ever-present factor Br, whose action, however, is locally inhi-
bited wherever yellow pigment appears as the final oxidation stage.

2. THE Brown-Propucine Cotor Factor, Br.

This factor, in my experience, is never wanting, though its presence is
often at least partly concealed by the factor B, which carries forward the
process of pigment formation from the brown to the black stage. In albinos,
also, when Y (the factor for producing yellow) is absent the factor Br, lacking
the material on which to act, does not function visibly. Thus it is not to be
wondered at that this factor Br has been omitted from the zygotic formule of
most investigators and that brown is considered commonly the result of the
absence of black. The chemical evidence already given, however, together with
the fact that brown pigment is often, if not always, to be found in black animals,
seems to justify the use of a distinct term to designate the factor that forms
brown. This factor is not to be confused with the absence of the factor for
black formation, which isa pure negation and can not be considered as an active
agent in the formation of anything.

3. THE Biack-Propucine Cotor Factor, B.

As before stated, this factor is necessary for the production of the highest
stage of mammalian pigment, viz, black. In its absence, the final oxidation
stage is brown, so that we may speak of ‘‘ animals lacking black”’ as brown, but
it is conceivable that animals might be found which also lack Br, in which case
the final oxidation stage would be yellow, not brown, and mere absence of black
would not in that case be equivalent to brown.

If we cross, then, animals homozygous for the factor B with animals
entirely lacking that factor, we should expect F to consist entirely of heterozy-
gous black animals. By experiment, 589 animals have been produced in this
way, all of which possessed black pigment. We should expect, now, that if such
black animals are crossed inter se, the next generation will consist of three
animals possessing black pigment to one lacking it completely. When this
cross was made the following result was obtained:

| Black. Brown.

Observed..... 591 216
Expected...... 605.25 201.75

22 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

In the cross between heterozygous black animals and the extracted brown
recessives, where equality of black young and young lacking black are expected,
the following result has been obtained:

Black. Brown.

Observed..... 198 187
Expected...... 192.5 192.5

If brown animals are crossed inter se, only brown young are expected.
The observed facts coincide with the expectation, 822 brown young having
been thus obtained.

It is, then, clear that the presence of the factor for the production of black
pigment and its absence result in a pair of allelomorphic unit characters. In
all the cases above mentioned the heterozygous black animals were indistin-
guishable from the homozygous blacks, so far as external appearances go. The
dominance of black is thus apparently complete. Miss Durham (1911), how-
ever, has recorded the occurrence of a distinct heterozygous form (“chocolate
lilac”) in crosses between pink-eyed black (“blue lilac’’) and pink-eyed brown
(“champagne’’) mice. The writer has made similar crosses with animals of
these color varieties, but is unable to confirm Miss Durham’s results.

Pink-eyed black mice vary in depth and intensity of pigmentation, which
fact will be discussed more fully under the head of distributive factors, but the
writer has been unable to detect any greater degree of brownness in the pink-
eyed blacks which are heterozygous (‘‘chocolate lilacs”’) than in those which are
homozygous. While it is possible that microscopic examination of the hair
of such heterozygous pink-eyed black animals may reveal a greater relative
amount of brown than occurs in the homozygous form of the same color variety,
it seems of doubtful propriety to call the heterozygous form a distinct color
variety. Furthermore, if the distinction between homozygous and heterozy-
gous pink-eyed blacks were a good one, it should be recognizable in the hetero-
zygotes produced by crossing pink-eyed black agouti with pink-eyed brown
agouti types. Miss Durham, however, mentions no such difference between
homozygous and heterozygous pink-eyed black agoutis, and I have been unable
to find any such difference in my own experiments.

Black, in its method of inheritance, forms one of the best examples of a
mendelian unit character. It is, moreover, clearly a positive character which
is dominant over its absence, or chemically expressed it is a higher oxidation
stage epistatic to a lower stage and independent of the latter in inheritance.

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS.

We have seen that three factors act as agents in the formation of the
pigments of mice. We may now consider the factors concerned in controlling
the distribution of pigments thus formed. It is obvious that theoretically the
distribution of pigment may be controlled in two general ways: (1) by the

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 23

ability to form either a greater or less total amount of pigment; or (2) by the
restriction or loss of one or more pigments from certain portions of the pelage,
thus producing “coat patterns.’’ The existence of two distinct factors of each
of these types has been proved by experiment. These will be presently
described.

For a basis from which to calculate increase or diminution in the total
amount of pigmentation (the first category of modifications mentioned), it is
desirable to have, as a standard, some known stock of as nearly constant
pigmentation as possible. For this purpose none seems better than the wild
house-mouse, Mus musculus. There is, to be sure, variation among the wild
individuals of this species, but on the whole it forms as satisfactory and constant
a basis ascan be obtained. To the factor producing the degree of pigmentation
observed in the common house-mouse we may give the designation D (density
of pigmentation).

This factor D affects the distribution of pigment granules of the three sorts,
yellow, brown, and black, but there is experimental evidence that another factor
exists which determines the amount of brown and black granules present with-
out affecting the number of yellow granules in the coat. To this factor we may
give the designation P (plenitude or fulness of brown and black pigmentation).
There is a complete series of color varieties as described by Castle and the
writer (1909), in which simultaneous modifications of both these factors exist, as
well as two other series in each of which one only of the two factors is modified.

Of the second category of distributive factors, those which cause local
restriction or loss of certain pigments, there are two clear examples in mice.
The first of these is seen in the case of the wild type, where the so-called “agouti”
pattern exists. This pattern results from the activity of a factor determining
the order in which pigments are laid down in the individual hair, and also
producing a differentiation between hairs of the dorsal and ventral surfaces.
This factor we may designate A (agouti). A factor of this sort produces the
“ticked” coat characteristic of almost all wild rodents. In the absence of A,
animals are self-colored.*

The second factor of this category is a restrictive factor which almost
excludes black and brown pigment from the hair and skin, thus leaving a pre-
ponderance of yellow granules in those localities and producing the so-called
“yellow” varieties of mice. This factor we may call F (restriction). In its
absence colored animals are either agouti if A is present, or self-colored if A
is absent.*

From this very brief description it may be seen that the presence of certain
distributive factors, or modifications of them, determines what color varieties
of mice shall be formed. These distributive factors determine either the total
amount of pigmentation or the relative amounts of yellow, brown, and black
that are visible. It is, then, obvious that they are factors dealing with “‘quan-
tity” of pigment, not with “quality” of pigment, as do the formative factors
Y, Br, and B. Since the “‘distributive” factors D, P, A, and R deal with

*This ignores spotted forms, which will be considered separately.

24 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

quantity of pigment, we might expect that they would show more fluctuations
than do the formative or qualitative factors Y, Br, and B; and such is the case,
as will presently be more fully described.

4, Tur Distrisutive Factor, D.

We have stated that this factor is responsible for the degree of density of
yellow, brown, and black pigmentation seen in the common wild house-mouse.
The presence of this factor is allelomorphic to a modification of density of pig-
mentation which we may call ‘dilute’ pigmentation and designate by d. This
dilute type of pigmentation was recognized by Bateson (1903) in mice. At
that time he stated that it consisted of a reduced number of pigment granules,
affecting both the cortex and medulla of the hair. To this the writer may add
that the pigmentation of the skin is visibly lessened in “ dilute” forms, and that
the eyes are also affected. When the eye of a “dilute” mouse is examined
under the microscope, reduction in the amount of pigment, as compared with
the densely pigmented forms, is seen to exist. This reduction occurs in both
retina and iris, but is more extensive in the former locality than in the latter.

The dilute forms of rabbits, as compared with the intense forms, show, on
microscopic examination of the hair, a reduction in number of the pigment gran-
ules in the cortex of the hair. The dilution in this case seems transferable to
hair of any color and is therefore comparable to dilution in mice, as it is also
in superficial resemblance, having a streaky and washed-out appearance to the
unaided eye.

In guinea-pigs the condition seems somewhat different. The problem
there does not appear to have been worked out with especial reference to dilu-
tion. There dilute forms do not appear streaky, although the cream type of
reduction seems either directly or indirectly transferable to black and brown.
It seems, however, doubtful whether a true dilution exists in guinea-pigs. There
is no evidence showing a modification of the intense colors, which modification
behaves as a unit character; and it seems probable, from the recent occurrence
of a pink-eyed colored guinea-pig (Castle, 1912b), that the reduction of pigment
seen in guinea-pigs is due to a modification approaching that seen in pink-eyed
mice, rather than the dilute modification.

The ‘‘dilute” modification affects all three pigments (yellow, brown, and
black), wherever they may occur. Castle and the writer (1909) recognized
this in mice in the ‘‘non-yellow ” varieties, including those possessing the agouti
factor. Plate (1910) recognizes a dilute series of color varieties, though using
a slightly different nomenclature to designate them. Morgan (1911a) inde-
pendently puts on record the occurrence of dilute animals with the agouti
pattern. Miss Durham (1911) also recognizes the existence of a dilute type
of every color variety. Previous to that time, however, she had not recog-
nized the relation of the dilute agouti animals to the dilute ‘‘non-agouti”’ forms.

Entirely distinct from this modification of the factor for density of pig-
mentation, which produces dilute forms, is the fluctuation of the degree of
density itself. Though “density” and “dilution” act as a pair of allelomor-

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 25

phic characters, “density” is subject to considerable fluctuation. Thus we
may have a gradual series of yellow mice, all possessing the factor D, but
varying in depth of pigmentation from an extremely light cream-color to a
deep rich orange. Microscopic examination of the hair of these various forms
shows in ‘‘cream” animals a distinctly smaller amount of pigment than in the
hairs of the darker grades of ‘‘dilute” yellow animals. Dilute animals also
vary in depth of color. For example, certain dilute browns may be of a dis-
tinctly lighter color than others. We know from the behavior of “density” and
“dilution” in crosses that they are allelomorphic to each other, but we must
admit that they are fluctuating characters and not stable in the sense of the
formative qualitative factors Y, Br, and B. The differences in depth of color
in the case of any color variety, either intense or dilute, are more easily dis-
cerned in those animals which have a preponderance of light pigment, such as
yellows, or in those possessing reduction in amount of pigment due to some
modification, such as dilute dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed mice.

In this connection it is interesting to note the occurrence of certain ‘coat
patterns” on mice, reported by Morgan (191la). He describes, among others,
patterns consisting of distinct regions of lighter and darker color. He further
states that when the light hairs are examined under the microscope they show
a lessening of pigment granules in different regions, ‘‘a lessening that is a
characteristic feature of the so-called dilute condition.’”’ But as reduction in
the amount of pigment occurs in the case of the “‘light”’ densely pigmented
and the “‘ pink-eyed”’ forms, as well as in the dilute forms, evidences of the sort
offered by Morgan can not be considered to establish his conclusion.

Is it not possible that these cases are those of intensely pigmented animals
showing on their coat somatic segregation of certain of the fluctuations that
are seen in dense pigmentation? Such “lightness” would not be in any way
correlated with dilution, and would appear in homozygous animals as well as in
heterozygous ones.

The writer suggested (19110) that such patterns as were described might
not be a criterion of the heterozygosity of their possessor, but due entirely to
the physiological condition of the animal at moulting. Morgan in reply (1911c)
stated that the cases he described were not “‘moulting”’ patterns, which were,
as he stated, ‘‘too familiar to * * * callfor comment.” Yet in his first
paper (1911a) he mentions certain “gray” animals, and figures two, which, as
he states, ‘‘show areas of lighter and darker color, and these may come and go
at each moult.”

The writer has obtained in a homozygous dilute brown animal (07317)
regions of clearly lighter hair than the predominant body color of the individual.
These lighter hairs are apparently full-grown, and remained clearly distin-
guishable in this animal for nearly a year, after which the animal died. If this
individual was heterozygous he might, as Morgan states, be considered as giving
“evidence of his dual nature,’’ but his gametic composition is ‘‘single;’’ so per-
haps the ‘‘evidence”’ in the case of the heterozygous animals reported by
Morgan is a matter of coincidence.

26 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

The above-described fluctuations in the density of pigmentation are to a
certain extent hereditary. Thus cream-colored mice crossed inter se have a
greater number of cream-colored than of deep-yellow young. So, too, from
deep-yellows crossed together the deep-yellow young preponderate, but cream-
colored young may occur as well.

We may now consider the result of crosses between intense animals pos-
sessing the factor D and animals with the modified or “‘dilute”’ condition d.
If homozygous intensely pigmented animals (DD) are crossed wtih dilute
animals (dd) only intense young (Dd) are formed in F;. In my experiments
424 young have been thus produced, all intense, manifesting D. If these het-
erozygotes are crossed together we should expect in F, the ratio 3 intense
to 1 dilute young. The experimental results are as follows:

| Intense. | Dilute.
|
Observed..... 610 205
Expected...... 608 . 25 203.75

When the heterozygous intense animals are crossed back with the dilute
type the following results have been obtained:

| Intense. | Dilute.
Observed..... 301 197
Expected...... 249 249

Here there is a marked deficiency of dilute animals, which is in all prob-
ability partly due to failure on my part to recognize as dilute certain of the pink-
eyed dilute animals produced during the years 1907-08. During these years
many matings of this type were made. In classifying the young obtained from
these I may have been in error. Thus if we consider the matings made since
1908, which should theoretically produce both dilute and intense young, we
should have the following results:

Cross of heterozygous F,
intense animals with
recessive.

Cross of heterozygous F,
intense animals infer se.

Intense. Dilute. Intense. Dilute.
Observed...| 345 140 146 166
Expected...) 363.75 121.25 156 156

Here there is an excess of dilute animals, which makes it seem probable
that in the matings previous to 1909, of the two types given above, I confused
the dilute and intense pink-eyed forms, often failing to distinguish them cor-

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 27

rectly. However, I feel sure that errors of this sort have not occurred since
1909, and the figures given above may be considered as a correct representation
of the observed facts. For the most part the behavior of density and dilution
is clearly that of a pair of allelomorphic unit characters, and they may therefore
be treated as such. Thus dilute animals crossed inter se give, as expected, only
dilute young, 603 such animals having been produced.

5. Tue DistrisutivE Factor, P.

As before stated, this factor affects brown and black pigment, but does not
affect the amount of yellow present. The modification of this factor giving
rise to the “ pink-eyed”’ series of colored mice, reduces the amount of black and
brown pigment to a very great extent. The reduction affects hair, skin, and
eyes. Miss Durham (1908) has pointed out the fact that the eyes, as the hair,
are not entirely devoid of pigment. In examining with the microscope sections
of the eye of a ‘‘pink-eyed”’ colored mouse, she found traces of pigment present,
but in such minute quantities as to make any qualitative analysis impossible.
The writer has examined under the microscope crushed eyes of the brown,
dilute brown, pink-eyed brown, and pink-eyed dilute brown varieties and has
thus been able to trace the steps in the reduction of pigment in these four vari-
eties with fair success. The eyes were prepared by dehydrating and clearing
in xylol. The lens was then removed and the iris and retina spread on the
slide and mounted in balsam. When thus prepared, the following conditions
were observed:

(1) In intense-brown animals, the iris is more heavily pigmented than the
retina, but both are thickly pigmented with brown only, no yellow.

(2) In dilute-brown animals, there is reduction of the total amount of pig-
ment, but the retina shows the effects of the reduction more than does the iris.
The pigment is brown only, no yellow.

(3) In pink-eyed intense-brown animals there is very little pigment in the
retina. The iris is moderately pigmented, but much less so than in the dilute-
brown form. The pigment is brown only.

(4) In pink-eyed dilute-brown animals the retina is apparently unpig-
mented, but the iris still contains a small amount of brown pigment. No
yellow pigment is present.

We may now turn to the experimental results obtained in crosses between
dark-eyed animals (PP) and pink-eyed animals (pp). In this case F consists
entirely of dark-eyed animals (Pp), 1,085 individuals having been thus obtained,
all dark-eyed and to external appearances indistinguishable from homogyzous
dark-eyed animals. These F; heterozygotes crossed inter se have given the
following result:

Dark-eyed.| Pink-eyed.
Observed....) 1,673 457
Expected....} 1,597.5 532.5

28 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

If these results are added to those obtained by Miss Durham in similar
matings we have:

Dark-eyed. | Pink-eyed.
Durham.............5. 876 303
PTE G] Sani iscenaie suey aeace 1.673 457
Total observed. . 2,549 760
Expected........ 2,481.6 827.4

The result is not strikingly close to the expected numbers. There is in my
experiments a deficiency of pink-eyed animals too extensive to be overcome by
the excess of pink-eyed obtained by Miss Durham. The difference in result in
the two cases may be considered as probably too great to be due entirely to
chance.* Furthermore, in the following cross the result is still more aberrant
and again there is a lack of pink-eyed animals. The cross is that of heterozy-
gous dark-eyed animals (Pp) with pink-eyed animals (pp). Equality of dark-
eyed and pink-eyed young is expected.

Dark-eyed.| Pink-eyed.

Observed... 370 284
Expected.... 327 327

Here, if the higher numbers (gained by adding Miss Durham’s results) are
considered, the numbers are closer to equality, though still widely unequal:

Dark-eyed. | Pink-eyed.

Duran... cccaaccaccaes 105 113
TYCELON, & sssecvcsnseeeded ane 370 284
Total observed. . 475 397
Expected........ 436 436

It is possible that in the ‘‘pink-eyed”’ animals of my strain some constitu-
tional weakness exists, either directly connected with the “pink-eyed” modi-
fication or to a marked degree correlated with it, which tends to cause a higher
degree of mortality among the pink-eyed than among the dark-eyed young. I
have tried, so far as possible, to record the eye-color of young aé birth, but have
failed in many cases. Even if it had been possible, it would not be safe to state
that animals with apparently unpigmented eyes were all pink-eyed colored
forms, for albinos at birth are indistinguishable from the pink-eyed colored
series.

When “ pink-eyed colored animals are crossed inter se, only “pink-eyed”’
animals have been produced; 496 young have been thus obtained.

*Using the method described by East & Hayes (1911) p.37, we find that the deviation
from the expected ratio is 0.0810, while the probable error is +0.0752.

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 29

“‘Pink-eyed”’ colored varieties are much ‘“yellower’’ in appearance than
their corresponding dark-eyed intense and dilute forms. This is due to two
facts:

(1) That in such forms as the pink-eyed black agouti and pink-eyed brown
agouti (both intense and dilute) the yellow band of the agouti pattern is left fully
pigmented, while the black and brown pigment in the same hairs is much reduced in
amount. Similarly pink-eyed yellow animals possess fully pigmented yellow
hair and thus have as heavily pigmented coats as dothe dark-eyed yellow types.

(2) In the pink-eyed black and pink-eyed brown varieties (intense and
dilute) there are no yellow pigment granules in the hair, but the extremely small
amount of black or brown pigment present gives the optical effect of an animal
with yellow pigment. This is especially marked in the case of the pink-eyed
brown variety.

The mutual independence of the factors D and P, and of their modifica-
tions d and p, was recognized by Castle and the writer (1909) and found to hold
good in all the color varieties, whether possessing the agouti pattern or not.
At that time we reported the cross of a dilute “dark-eyed” animal with an
intense “‘pink-eyed”’ animal, resulting in the production of a ‘“dark-eyed in-
tense” F,. We had then only a small number of F, animals from such crosses,
but those showed that the four theoretical classes of offspring were produced.
In similar crosses we have now obtained the following result:

coe Dark-eyed | Pink-eyed | Pink-eyed

intense. dilute. intense. dilute.
Observed... 71 32 28 6
Expected... V7 25.7 25.7 8.6

Other crosses showing the independence of D and P have been made, and
the results all follow the expectations with reasonable accuracy. Miss Durham
(1911) has also recognized the independence of D and P, but without giving
numerical results showing the occurrence of the intense and dilute types of the
various pink-eyed color varieties. She, however, recognizes the independence
of pink-eye and dilution only in those mice ‘‘in which yellow is absent.’’ The
fact that their independence has been observed and experimentally proved in
animals (agouti) in which yellow is present seems to remove this restriction.
Thus, for example, the cross reported in 1909, and already referred to, shows
that their independence is clear-cut, even in the individual hair, and that the
presence of yellow in the hair aids in showing their independence; for in the
dilute agoutis (brown or black) all the pigment in the hair is reduced in amount,
while in the pink-eyed agoutis (brown or black), the yellow band in the hair is
as heavily pigmented as in dark-eyed agouti forms.

We may now consider, in order, the two factors which have to do with the
relative distribution of the three pigments, yellow, brown, and black, in the
hair and skin. These factors A (agouti) and R (restriction), already briefly
described, have certain characteristics in common, and evidence exists (as will

30 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

be discussed later) that they may be closely related. Their sphere of action is
limited to the hair and skin, to the exclusion of the eye. In this respect they
differ fundamentally from the distributive factors D and P, already described.

6. Tue Distrirputive Factor, A.

This factor was first recognized by Cuénot (1902) under the designation of
G (gris), as producing the pattern seen on the coat of the wild house-mouse; but
he erred in considering the factor G as allelomorphic to the factor N (noir) for
the production of black pigment. Castle (1907a) proved that in guinea-pigs
the agouti pattern is a unit character allelomorphic to its absence. Guided
by this hypothesis he formed a new color variety of guinea-pig (cinnamon).
Furthermore, he proved (1907a) that the agouti pattern might be carried by
certain red animals, which when crossed with blacks produced agouti young in
the first generation. By experimental test it was proved that all black animals
behaved the same in the crosses made and that the reds differed. Morgan
(1911a) quotes Castle as stating that in the above-mentioned crosses both the
blacks and reds were able to transmit the agouti type of coat. Having thus
misquoted Castle, Morgan offers as a suggestion the explanation which Castle
proved was correct in 1907.

The agouti pattern consists in mice (Allen, 1904) of two chief types of dor-
sal hairs: (1) Those having a fine black tip, a sub-apical band of light ochraceous
color (occupying about one-fifth of the hair) and a dark plumbeous basal por-
tion. (2) Others, less numerous, are black throughout.

The ventral hairs Allen describes as possessing a distal half, which is dirty
white to pale ochraceous buff, and a basal half which is plumbeous. Castle
(1907b), in describing the agouti pattern in guinea-pigs, states that the tips are
black in hairs showing the ticking; then follows a yellow or red band, and then
the hair is black tothe base. Both of theseinvestigators find that the “ticked”
hairs have black tips, as does Hurst (1905) in the case of rabbits.

Morgan (1911a) states that he has obtained black animals which have cer-
tain of their hairs brown-tipped. These he characterizes as agoutis without the
yellow band and further states that the ticked hairs in the coat of “agouti”
animals are brown-tipped. It isobvious that he is dealing with acolorpattern
in his “gray” (agouti) animals which ts not identical with the agouti pattern as
described by other investigators. It tends, therefore, to confusion to treat the
pattern that he is dealing with as agouti. Furthermore, it seems probable
that the blacks, which he reports as having ticked (brown-tipped) hairs, do not
possess a factor in the least comparable with the “agouti” pattern. Morgan
himself states that these brown-tipped hairs occur only in heterozygous black
mice. The question suggests itself, how can mice possess, as a result or neces-
sary concomitant of heterozygosis, a pattern which is the characteristic of a
homozygous wild race?

Bateson (1903) stated that in black mice the tips of the large contour hairs
are often brown. ‘Ticked hairs in non-agouti (black) mice are not, then, a new
development, and as black mice have been long used in experiments and have

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 31

never been found to transmit the agouti pattern, it seems that Morgan has been
misled by the superficial appearance of “ticking” in the hair.

That superficial ticking is not identical with the agouti pattern is observ-
able in the case of ‘“‘sable’’ mice, as will be more fully discussed later. Itis also
observable in certain “dingy” or “smoky” young produced by Himalayan
rabbits. In this case there may be as many as two light bands in the “‘ticked”’
hairs, the dark portions of which seem to contain a small amount of black pig-
ment producing the dingy appearance alluded to. In such cases it is known
that neither parent carries the agouti pattern, yet here are hairs with an appa-
rently similar ticking; therefore not all ticking of rodent hairs is due to the
same factor.

We may now consider crosses in which the “agouti” pattern is involved.
In the cross between homozygous agouti and non-agouti forms, F, consists
entirely of agouti (black agouti or brown agouti) animals, 344 young having
been thus obtained. When certain of these heterozygous Ff; animals were
crossed inter se there were obtained:

Agouti. | Non-agouti.

Observed....| 257 74
Expected..... 243.75 81.25

If the heterozygous F, agoutis are crossed with non-agouti mice we should
expect equality of agouti and non-agouti young. In this cross I have obtained:

| Agouti. | Non-agouti.
Observed.... 194 170
Expected..... 182 182

When non-agouti animals are crossed inter se only non-agouti young are
produced, the numbers in this case being 1,812.

From the result of these crosses it may be stated that the agouti pattern,
though it may or may not be a single unit character, certainly behaves like one.
Until it has been shown to be complex, the only safe course seems to be to con-
sider it simple and allelomorphic to its absence.

7. Tue Distrisutive Factor, &.

This factor produces the true yellow varieties of mice by an almost com-
plete exclusion of brown and black from the skin and hair. In those localities,
therefore, the process of pigment formation is carried only as far as the “ yellow”
stage. The chief point of importance in connection with the appearance of
yellow in the coat is this: Yellow-pigment granules, so far as experimental evi-
dence goes, never appear in the skin and hair of mice unless certain distributive
factors (A or R) are present to exclude part or all of the brown and black from
those localities. In such regions oxidation beyond the yellow stage is impos-

32 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

sible. Inthe absence of factors A and # the oxidation proceeds, over the whole
coat, to the stage determined by the presence of the formative factors, Br or B.

“Yellow” mice are not produced by a factor comparable to the factors Br
and B, but by a factor having an entirely different function, namely, that of
restriction or inhibition. The nature of the agouti factor A is also restrictive,
though in a much more limited degree. Thus the factors A and R have func-
tions which are roughly comparable, in that they both “restrict” the formation
of black and brown, allowing yellow to take their place.

In studying the relation of “yellow” to black agouti mice, Miss Durham
(1911) has obtained extremely interesting and valuable results. Thus she has
in two cases obtained a “yellow” animal from agouti parents, which is a rever-
sal of the ordinary conditions. The fact that such a reversal of dominance can
exist is of extreme importance and adds one more peculiarity to the genetic
behavior of ‘‘yellow” mice. In all crosses made by the writer, however, yellow
has proved epistatic to black agouti. When the black agouti young obtained
from yellows were crossed inter se, 71 young were obtained, none of which were
yellow.

When cream (fig. 18) is crossed with wild black agouti the yellow young
obtained are cream; thus 3 cream and 2 light-black agoutt young have been
obtained. The wild black agouti possesses potentially a “cream” degree of
pigmentation. If creams are crossed with black agouti animals produced by
synthesis in experiments with other varieties, the yellow young produced are
yellow, not cream, thus 12 yellows and 6 intense non-yellow young have been
produced. These synthesized agoutis, then, are not potentially cream, but are
darker-colored members of the series which fluctuates between cream and deep
orange.

Cuénot (1905) reported the fact that homozygous yellow mice were not
obtainable in his extensive experiments. This fact has been corroborated
by other investigators. Cuénot (1911) has stated that the factor R, which
restricts brown and black from the pelage, is the same in function as the factor
Y, which forms the “yellow’’ degree of oxidation, and that there is no need of
including both in the gametic formule of mice. But chemical evidence indi-
cates that all brown or black pigmented mice must possess the ability to form
yellow pigment in order to form the higher stages, viz, brown and black.
Furthermore, they must possess this at times in all their gametes, otherwise a
homozygous brown or black animal would be impossible. Y, therefore, which
produces the yellow degree of oxidation is not comparable to R, which can occur
in only one of the gametes of a zygote and which restricts brown and black
forming material, thus producing visibly yellow mice.

Mice homozygous in Y are represented by wild black agoutis, but mice
homozygous in & need not occur, by any present theory, nor do they occur in
actual experiment.

Yellow varieties of mice exist, as Cuénot (1911) recognizes, in all the color
varieties in which non-yellow mice exist. Their external appearance, however,
leads one to identify only six types, namely: (1) black-eyed yellows, brown-eyed

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 33
yellows, black-eyed dilute yellows, and brown-eyed dilute yellows in the “dark-
eyed”’ series; (2) pink-eyed yellows and pink-eyed dilute yellows in the pale
series. The experimenter can not distinguish by external appearances the black
eyed and brown-eyed forms of the pink-eyed yellow series, and so must class
them together unless breeding tests be applied.

The “yellow” coat of mice is due to as true a pattern factor as is the agouti
coat, and the investigator errs when he considers the “yellow coat” a lower
stage of development of a black or brown coat. Yellow pigment appears in the
ticked or agouti coat by the action of a factor whose function is of a restrictive
or inhibitive nature. In a very similar fashion yellow pigment appears on a
greater scale in the coat of the “‘yellow”’ mouse.

“Yellow” in mice is no more allelomorphic to gray than is gray allelomor-
phic to black. Castle, as already stated, has shown that the factor which pro-
duces the ticked or gray coat is allelomorphic to its absence, not to black or any
other pigment. It is an excellent thing to simplify gametic formule when this
can be done with the support of experimental evidence, but the experimental
work should precede the “‘simplification’”’ unless a false impression is to be
produced.

Tf yellow animals are crossed with non-yellow, equality of yellow and non-
yellow young is approximated. The following numbers have been obtained:

| Yellow. | Non-yellow.
Observed... |

872

868 868

864 |

Several litters of young have been produced by yellows mated inter sesince
the publication in 1910 of figures showing approximately a 2 to 1 ratio. The
additional observations are:

| Yellow. | Non-yellow.
Observed................ 48 20
Expected, 2tol.......... 45.2 22.6
Expected, 8tol.......... 51 17

If these figures be added to those obtained by Miss Durham (1911), by
Cuénot (1903), and by Castle and the writer (1910), the following result is
obtained:

Yellow. | Non-yeilow.

Miss Durham (1911)...... 448 232
Cuénot (1903)............ 263 100
Castle & Little (1910)... .} 1,024 538
Little (1910 and 1911)..... 48 20

Total: svat cadens 1,783 890

Expected, 2to1....| 1,782.2 891

Expected, 3 to 1....} 2,004.75 668.25

34 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

The relation of the restriction factor R to the factors P and D has been
considered briefly under the head of those factors. The occurrence of dilute
yellow mice, clearly distinguishable from ‘“‘creams” or “‘light yellows,” was
reported by the writer (1911) in the dark-eyed color series. Since that time a
few crosses have been made with pink-eyed dilute yellows and they have been
found to conform in their general behavior with other yellow varieties. They
apparently can not be obtained in a homozygous state, and when crossed inter
se give pink-eyed dilute yellow and pink-eyed dilute non-yellow, as 2 to 1.

Dilute yellow animals, whether clear, sooty, or sable, are in appearance
more heavily pigmented than are the lightest creams; but they, as the intense
yellows, are found in shades of yellow that vary between cream and deep orange.
Any and all dilute yellows have, however, the characteristic streaky, washed-
out look of the dilute black or dilute brown forms. In crosses, dilute yellows
bred inter se have given:

| Dilute | Dilute
| yellow. | non-yellow.

|

' Observed........ 100 54
' Expected, 2tol..) 102.67 51.33
Expected, 3 to1..} 115.5 38.5

|

It will, then, be seen that dilute yellows, like intense yellows, give a 2 to 1
ratio, the homozygous type being apparently unable to develop.
Dilute yellows crossed with dilute non-yellows have given the following:

Dilute | Dilute

yellow. | non-yellow.
Observed........ 61 56
Expected......... 58.5 58.5

8. Soory YELLOWS AND SABLES.

It is well-known that varieties of yellow mice exist which have a varying
amount of dark pigment (brown or black) in the hairs on their dorsal and lateral
surfaces; this produces types of yellow known as ‘‘sooty yellows” or “sables.”’
The amount of dark pigment varies from a few dark hairs, scattered along the
mid-dorsal line, to a condition in which the whole dorsal and nearly all the
lateral surfaces are dark, leaving yellow confined to the more ventral portions
of the sides and to the belly. A series of arbitrary grades indicating the degree
of sootiness has been constructed within the past year. By this means it is
hoped to get more accurate ideas as to the nature of sooty yellows. The grades
are based upon skins of ‘‘sooty”’ animals and these skins are used as the types
by which the living animals are graded. Several experiments have been at-
tempted with the sooty yellows, but all these are still in a preliminary state.
Higher numbers of individuals from experiments now in progress may tend to
change the conclusions to be drawn from work with this variety.

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 35

The sooty yellows in my stock are most of them homozygous for black, 7.e.,
BB. The question arose, how would such sooty forms behave if crossed with
clear yellow lacking B. Experimental evidenceshows that sooty yellows hav-
ing only one dose of B are not as dark as those with two doses.

Thus 7451 sooty (grade +13) when crossed with sooty yellow female 7452
(+14) gave sooty yellow young, the average grade of which was+1l. The
same male when crossed with a brown ( 2 7730) gave yellow young, the grades
of which averaged +.31. The writer has never obtained a sooty yellow or sable
that did not carry the factor for the production of black pigment (B) in at least
half its gametes. Several hundred sooty yellows or sables have been obtained.

Yellows having one dose of B when crossed inter se should give (besides
yellows of their own type) those lacking B entirely as well as those having two
doses of B. If the “sooty” character segregates, 25 per cent of the yellow
animals should approximate the grade of their ‘‘sooty” grandparent, 50 per
cent should resemble their parents, and 25 per cent should be clear yellow like
their other grandparent. A table follows, showing the results of two families
in this experiment. The numbers of young are as yet small.

Sooty yellow x brown.

Grades of F, yellow young.
coe of No. of F; | Average | No. of F2 : AvGERee
ee pean yellow | grade of | yellow yellow
parent. young. | Fi yellows.| young. O | .25 | .50 | .75 | 1.00; young.

+ .25.... 12 +.06 7 7
+1.25.... 4 +.31 6 1

It will, then, be seen that when the sooty grandparent is of low grade, +3,
nearly clear yellow, his “‘sooty”’ character is to all intents and purposes lost in
the cross with brown. It fails to reappear in /2, so far as the animals obtained
are concerned. When the grade of the sooty grandparent is 5 times as great,
that is, +1.25, it will be seen that the average grade of F is also about 5 times as
great (that is, 0.31 as compared with 0.06). Also in F, darker forms are
obtained which may approach the degree of sootiness seen in the grandparent.

Miss Durham (1911) is able to distinguish clearly between “‘sooty yellows”
and ‘“‘sables.”” In this connection she characterizes “‘sables” as produced in
crossing yellows with blacks or browns. They have a dark black or brown
streak down the middle of the back, while the rest of the mouse is yellow.
Generally the hairs in the dark streak show a ticked pattern independent of
whether the animal carries agouti or not. She has had certain animals (sables)
which were dark-pigmented except for a yellow belly. Such animals always
molted out sables. She says “sables” are not to be confused with sooty
yellows, which result from mating yellow with black, and are dirty color all
over with no pattern. She finds that yellows crossed inter se may give “‘sables,”’
and that ‘‘sables” crossed inter se may give yellows, and that matters are

36 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

further complicated by the occurrence of so-called ‘“‘reversed sables,” in which
the dark hairs had yellow tips and bases, with a dark subapical band.

The writer must confess that he is unable to draw a clear line between
“sables” and ‘sooty yellows” in all cases. The term sooty yellow is there-
fore intended in this paper to cover both varieties.

It is possible to explain the appearance of sooty yellows on the basis of
fluctuation in activity of the factor R, restriction. Thus, when & is present in
full strength the animal is clear yellow; if & is slightly weaker, some dark
pigment shows itself.

The amount of dark pigment visible becomes progressively greater as the
factor R becomes weaker or takes on a rhythmical activity. Thus, if R is
hampered in activity during the growth of the first part of the hair, we have a
dark tip formed. But if R comes into full activity again, a yellow band results,
followed by a second weakening of FR, resulting in a dark base to the hair.
This would account for the superficial similarity to the agouti pattern. ‘‘Re-
versed sables” may possibly result from a reversal of the order in which the
strong and weak periods of R occur. So, too, those very dark sooty yellows
that lack the ticked-hair pattern may be considered due to continued weakness
of the factor R during development of the hair of the first coat. When the
second coat is formed, however, the factor R makes its appearance felt more
strongly and an ordinary type of sable results, with less dark pigment than was
present on the first coat.

In all such cases the idea is present that there is quantitative variation in
the activity of the restriction factor R, showing itself in the varying amount of
black or dark pigment present. If such weakness is due to any interchange of
substance between gametes or any quantitative inexactitude in the process of
segregation, we should expect that repeated crosses of sooty yellows with
blacks would tend to produce much weakened yellows (7. e., very dark sooty)
with much black pigment, as well as modified blacks with some yellow pigment
present. While this experiment has not yet been carried to large numbers it
may be of interest to record the pedigree of one family:

Generation. Parents. Progeny.
Tegiseecass 4347 sooty yel. x 24346 black 9sooty,av.+ .78,and 2 blk.
Dice ert ad dud o'7451 sooty yel. x 97729 black 4sooty, av. + 1.25, and 2 blk.
II....... 1029 sooty yel. x{ jg3yblack, 6* sooty, av. + 1.50, and 7* blk.

*Among these sooties was 071318 (fig. 20) graded +3, darker by four ‘one-quarter’
grades than any sooty previously obtained. The best previous was+2. Among theblacks
in the same litter was 71316, the first visibly modified black known to be homozygous in
hundreds of black animals that I have seen. His coat is distinctly tawny.

“Sooty yellows” and “sables” have not been reported in the pink-eyed
series. This accords with the results expected by theory, for the modification

of the factor P, which produces pink-eyed forms, reduces the brown and black

DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 37

pigment granules in the hair to such a degree that we should expect the dark
pigment in the hairs of dark-eyed “sooty,” yellows, and “‘sables”’ to be entirely
lost in corresponding pink-eyed forms.

We have seen that the factor which produces “yellow” mice is dominant
to its absence and is (in function) an inhibitor or restrictor of brown and black.
It is interesting to compare with this condition the conditions observed in
rabbits and guinea-pigs.

In rabbits Castle (19076) has shown the occurrence of two types of “‘yel-
low” animals, both of which are hypostatic to non-yellow forms. The process
of restriction, if it be such, that produces the yellow type of coat in rabbits is
not as extensive as that which produces the clear yellow of mice. Thus all
yellow rabbits which lack the factor A are, as Castle has shown, sooty; that is,
they have considerable black pigment in the hair, which produces not a clear
yellow, but a dull or dingy yellow coat. Such a condition, varying or fluc-
tuating as it does in sooty yellows of the same gametic composition, may
be called due to an imperfectly recessive character; that is to say, a condition
which shows varying amounts of a dominant character on extracted recessive
individuals, may be considered as showing imperfect recessiveness. Such a
condition would be more explicable on the grounds that “yellow” in rabbits
appeared as a restriction of black and brown than as a loss of those substances.
Yellow in rabbits would then be, according to a nomenclature and system sug-
gested by Dr. Castle, due to a semi-potent restrictive factor. By semi-potent is
meant a positive character which must be present in all the gametes of an indi-
vidual, for its manifestation in the zygote.

With such semi-potent characters may be contrasted uni-potent characters,
which cause visible effect in the zygote when present in one-half its gametes.
An example of this category of factors is seen in the factor #, in mice, which we
have been discussing.

In guinea-pigs, however, we seem to have a different condition, in that
sooty-yellow animals are very rarely formed. Thus yellow guinea-pigs ex-
tracted as recessive from a black race are, in a great majority of cases, clear
yellows, whether they are “reds” or light ‘‘creams.”” The occurrence of such
clear yellows is more explicable on a theory demanding loss of brown and black
pigment from the skin and hair than from a process of restriction, for it has
been seen that restriction is at times an extremely imperfect process, subject to
frequent fluctuations in degree of activity, while loss is or should be a clear-cut
process, removing the possibility of frequent fluctuations by completely remov-
ing the materials from which such fluctuations arise.

In studying “yellow” color varieties similarity of color should not have suf-
ficient value in analysis to argue a common origin of all yellow forms. Discus-
sion of such a question as the origin and physiological significance of different
types of yellow must, at least for the present, be based on generalities, since defi-
nite evidence is wanting. Ontheevidence given by such general facts, the writer
has above outlined a possible explanation of the observed conditions, fully realiz-
ing, however, that at best such an explanation is incomplete and unsatisfactory.

38 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING.

Spotted forms exist in all the various color varieties of mice. Such
spotted or piebald animals possess an amount of white varying from a few
white hairs to a condition in which pigment occurs in the eye alone, all the coat
being white. Spotting is at present one of the least-understood color phenom-
ena, and further research is necessary before the correctness of any hypothesis
concerning it can be proved. Nevertheless, it seems advisable to consider the
physiological nature of spotting and to attempt to eliminate such theories as
may be shown, even with our present imperfect knowledge, to be incorrect.
As stated in the first part of this paper, present chemical knowledge leads us to
the belief that all mammalian pigments are melanins.

Superficially, spotting appears to be partial albinism, and the question
naturally arises as to whether it really is due to the same cause or causes that
produce albinism, such cause or causes manifesting their presence in a lesser
degree or in a mosaic condition.

Experimental evidence does not support a theory which postulates the
common origin of white produced by spotting and that produced by albinism.
If spotting is partial albinism we should expect, when spotted animals are
crossed with albinos, that only spotted or albino animals would be obtained.
Among the results observed by various investigators, none show better the fal-
lacy of this point of view than the classic experiments of Darbishire (1902) with
crosses of spotted waltzing mice and albinos of gray (black agouti) ancestry.
The appearance of uniformly pigmented animals in the first generation of this
cross proved conclusively that the processes producing the white of spotted
coats and the white of albinos are not only non-identical, but are fundamen-
tally different.

Since a difference in origin of these two types of white exists, the next
matter of interest is to find out whether the difference lies in the qualitative
chemical make-up of the two whites or in the nature of the distributive proc-
esses which allow them to appear in the hair.

Experiments bearing upon the qualitative nature of the two types of white
have been made by Mudge (1909a) on piebald (spotted) and albino rats. He
treated the pelage of animals of both these varieties with chemical agents cal-
culated to provide an oxidizing substance which might act upon the chromogen
in the white portions of the coat, if such a chromogen were present there. He
found that the white hairs in both categories of animals became yellow, both
reacting equally to the agent provided. A few months after the publication of
his work on rats he obtained similar results in piebald and albino mice, by
slightly varying the composition of the agent used.

The writer does not possess sufficient knowledge of chemistry to comment
upon the ultimate value of the work done by Mudge, but in absence of contrary
evidence it seems that his work, especially as it deals with the very types that
we are considering, is worthy of confidence and forms a suitable base from
which to draw conclusions.

THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING. 39

If, as Riddle states, it seems absurd to postulate the complete loss of chro-
mogens in albinos, we must suppose that an enzyme or enzymes have been lost, in
order to prevent the formation of pigment. If, now, the work of Mudge shows
that the white of spotting lacks the same class of substance as the white of
albinism we must say that here also the enzyme or enzymes are absent from the
white areas. But by the work of Darbishire, already alluded to, and that of
later investigators as well, it is shown that the processes concerned in the
origin of the two types of whites are not identical. We must then, by elimi-
nation, come to the conclusion that the nature of the processes which control
the distribution of the enzyme or enzymes differs in the two categories.

We have seen that the amount of pigment in the hair of intense pigmented
animals is dependent upon the cooperation of two factors, D and P. In the
wild Mus musculus the pigment occurs distributed over the entire coat, and the
animal is said to be self or uniformly pigmented.

We havesupposed that the distribution of pigment is controlled by certain
factors. Thus we have supposed that density of pigmentation is controlled by
a factor D, by the activity of which a certain amount of pigment is formed in
eyes and skin and hair. We have recognized a quantitative modification of
this factor in the case of dilute varieties, possessing less pigment. Since this
modification affects all three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) and since
we have supposed brown and black to be higher oxidation stages of yellow, it
seems logical to consider D a factor modifying Y, and in this way also modify-
ing Br and B, which are, so to speak, converted Y. When D is modified in
amount, less Y is converted to the brown or black stage. This is the condition
seen in dilute animals. Logically we should expect another type of modifica-
tion of Y. In self animals Y is distributed over the whole coat. We should
expect some forms in which Y was distributed only to certain portions of the
body. This modification is seen inthe formsin which whitespotsoccur. Such
white areas may be considered as those from which the Y-forming substance is
absent. Thus the relation of these factors to one another may be roughly

shown as follows:
; Distributed in a certain ee in amount to
Color producing degree of density = D \ form dilute varieties =d
substance Y Distributed to acertain {Modified in amount to
extent (self) =S jee spotted varieties=s
If we designate the spotted (piebald) forms by the letter s, we may logi-
cally consider the unmodified self forms as being of the constitution S. We
would expect, then, that in crosses between a spotted race of known gametic
formula (s) and a self race of formula (S) a mendelian monohybrid ratio would
be observed. That such is the case has been recorded by Doncaster (1906) and
by Castle and MacCurdy (1907) in the case of ‘‘hooded” and self rats. Such
a type of spotting as that seen in the hooded rats is, then, a unit character so
far as its behavior in crosses is concerned.
Cuénot, working with mice, has found that spotted forms exist, varying
greatly in proportion of white to colored areas. This series of spotted forms
he accounts for by supposing that there are present a number of small factors

40 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

for the production of spotting (panachure). These he designates p1, pe, ps,
pa, . . . . ete. Cuénot is by nomeans alone in favoring multiple factors as
an explanation for spotting. It is easy and attractive to imagine a factor for
every observed degree of spotting. The various types of spotted animals seem
clear-cut, the colored and white areas seem to form a marked contrast, and the
presence of many factors to produce these many forms gives an air of finality
to an hypothesis which is alluring.

The advantages of a multiple-factor hypothesis, however, are rendered
dubious by the observed occurrence of strains which show that a certain amount
of fluctuation exists in the manifestation of even these assumed multiple units.
It is questionable whether it would be possible to distinguish between a result
produced by multiple factors of the number necessary to explain the occurrence
of the various spotted forms and a continuous series formed by fluctuation of
of the original modification which produces spotting.

Observed experimental facts, however, do not favor a multiple-factor
hypothesis. Thus, if multiple factors for spotting existed, the black-eyed
white variety would possess the greatest number of these spotting factors.
Cuénot in mice and Castle in guinea-pigs found that spotting was recessive to
self in crosses. Therefore the black-eyed white forms would possess a great
number of recessive spotting factors, p1, Pe, D3, P41, Ps, Pe, etc. How, then,
could two such animals when crossed inéer se give in their young practically the
whole gamut of spotted forms, as Castle (1905, p. 45), found was the case.

In a somewhat similar way the presence-and-absence hypothesis meets
with trouble in the same cross, 7. e., black-eyed white x black-eyed white. The
spotting from which the black-eyed whites are derived is recessive. It is,
therefore, according to the presence-and-absence hypothesis, as advanced by
Bateson and Punnett, due to the loss or absence of a factor or factors for uni-
formity of pigmentation. Yet two animals having, according to this theory,
lost the factors for pigment production in the coat, give young which often
have a large amount of pigment on the coat. The presence-and-absence
hypothesis, in order to explain this case, must imagine a degree of fluctuation
in the manifestation of the spotting character which makes proof of the
multiple-factor hypothesis difficult if not impossible.

In the writer’s opinion, present knowledge of spotted forms is too scanty
to decide whether spotting is due to a process of loss of the factor for uniformity
of pigmentation, or to a hypostatic restrictive factor. It seems, however, that
such spotting as one encounters in guinea-pigs, hooded rats, and in many mice
is a unit character subject to enormous quantitative fluctuation, and that it
may be considered due to a modification of the factor Y or U which is hypo-
static to unmodified or “self” forms.

In view of the fact that the same substance Y is distributed in two different
ways to produce spotting and dilution, we may consider it as consisting of an
amount of pigment (D) distributed over the entire animal (S); therefore we
may consider the pigment of the wild mouse as being designated by the letters
DS. An animal may then be of one of the following formule:

DS intense self. Ds intense spotted. dS dilute self. ds dilute spotted.

THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING. 41

We have previously discussed the observable fluctuations in amount of
pigment in animals possessing D, for example in yellows. The fluctuations
observed in the case of spotted animals are little if any greater in extent than the
fluctuations from deep orange to cream already noted in the case of yellow mice.
If there are two ways (d and s) in which the factors D and S may respec-
tively be modified, we should expect that the same might hold in the case of the
factor P. The quantitative modification of this factor (p), acting upon brown
and black pigment to the exclusion of yellow, produces the pink-eyed colored
series.

If a regional modification of black and brown forming substances (Br and
B) existed, we should expect a spotted condition to be formed. Here, however,
the spots would be black or brown on a yellow ground. To such a class as this
we may say that the tortoise varieties of guinea-pigs belong. This condition
is in a measure hypostatic to self-pigmented forms, as are the (s) spotted forms.
We have supposed that the factor P produced a certain amount of black or
brown substance typified by the wild Mus musculus. This factor, then, ap-
pears to bear the same relation to the factors Br and B that the factor D does to
the factor Y. We may, therefore, logically construct a rough diagram to show
the relations of the distributive factors to Br and B, as we did in the case of Y:

Factors for the Br Distributed in a certain A ine in amount to form
production of
brown and

black pigment

degree of depth = P pink-eyed varieties = p
Distributed to certain eee in amount to form
extent (total) = 7

tortoise varieties = ¢

If we designate the tortoise spotting by f, we may consider its epistatic
allelomorph as T’, total or self pigmentation. In this case the factor P becomes
complicated, as did the factor D, becoming PT. As in the case of the factor
DS, animals may be of any one of the following formule:

PT dark-eyed self. pT pink-eyed self.
Pt dark-eyed tortoise. pt pink-eyed tortoise.

In mice we find that the p modification has taken place, while in guinea-
pigs the ¢ modification is well known, and Castle (1912b) has described the origin
of a pink-eyed form of guinea-pig which may turn out to be the p modification.

It may be seen from the foregoing description that the two forms of
spotting (piebald and tortoise) are entirely independent, and it is thus entirely
conceivable that they should occur in the same individual. This appears to
be the case in the well-known tri-colored breeds of domesticated animals.

One of the best-known cases of inheritance in tri-colored races is found in
the case of ‘basset’? hounds, on which Galton based his “law” of heredity.
The character considered was the presence or absence of black in addition to
yellow and white. When black was present the tri-color condition was pro-
duced. Though there is no direct evidence at hand, Bateson (1909), in dis-
cussing these experiments, states that yellow is not usually dominant to black.
If this is the case the observed facts may be explained as follows:

In guinea-pigs the presence of black and yellow spots on any individual
depends upon the presence of a spotting character which acts upon a totally

42 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

black pigmented animal to produce a blotched black-and-yellow appearance.
For the sake of convenience we may call animals possessing this “tortoise”
marking ¢. All self-black animals lacking this modification, and therefore
having no red blotches, are of the formula 7. Experiments with guinea-pigs
(at present being carried on by Dr. Castle) shows that self-black is epistatic to
tortoise. .This pair of characters is, however, independent from the factors,
E =extended black pigmentation, necessary for the production of any black hairs
on the coat, and its allelomorph e =the loss of black pigment from the coat,
producing yellow animals.

Thus, if arace of tortoise animals existed, formula HEtt, we should have a
homozygous race of tortoise animals (which in fact exist). If, however, the
tortoise animals were of the formula Hetf we should expect young of three
kinds:

(a) EEtt tortoise. (b) Eett tortoise. (c) eett yellow.*

Types (a) and (b) having # present would be able to form black pigment on the
coat; but type (c), lacking H, would be yellow in appearance, though it would
be potentially tortoise.

If the factor for spotting with white (s) be added to the formula of a tor-
toise animal (ett), we should have, if these animals were bred together, three
kinds of young.

(a) HEittss tri-color (tortoise and white).
(b) Eettss tri-color (tortoise and white).
(c) eettss yellow and white.*

Types (a) and (b) would be tri-color, that is, tortoise and white; type (c)
would be yellow and white. This might account for the appearance of yellow
and. white individuals in a race of tri-colored animals.

If, however, yellow were epistatic to black, as in mice, we should have to
explain things differently. Tortoise animals could then be of only one formula
and would breed true, being recessives, whereas self yellows might also produce
tortoise young.

rrtt =tortoise.
Rrtt =yellow (heterozygous in tortoise).
RRit =yellow (homozygous).

If, now, the modification s were added to such hypothetical tortoise
animals, we should have

rritss =tri-color (tortoise and white) homozygous.

If such animals were crossed inter se, we should, on genetic grounds, have
to suppose a change of dominance to explain the occurrence of yellow-and-
white young. This does not seem likely. A simple mechanical fact is, how-
ever, able to account for the occurrence of yellow-and-white animals in an
homozygous or heterozygous race of tortoise-and-white (tri-color) animals.
Both forms of spotting are independent as to the regions of the coat which they
affect. If the white regions should, by chance, coincide with the black regions

*Castle (1905), p. 34, has described such animals.

CROSSES WITH JAPANESE WALTZING MICE. 43

of a tortoise animal we should have an animal yellow-and-white in appearance,
though gametically a pure tri-color (tortoise and white). This condition is
found in guinea-pigs where two yellow (red) and white animals when crossed
together have given young with black on the coat (Castle, 1912), and we know
that one of these animals at least must have the gametic composition of a tri-
color. In a case of this sort the yellow-and-white animals would occur in
ratios entirely free from any mendelian principle, and would give a spurious
reversal of dominance.

Perhaps one of the two foregoing suggestions may serve to throw some light
on the results upon which Galton’s “law” of heredity was based. It must be
remembered that tortoise-shell animals are in their gametic composition no more
intermediates between black (extended) and yellow (restricted) animals than
forms spotted with white are intermediate between colored forms and albinos.

CROSSES WITH JAPANESE WALTZING MICE.

Morgan (1911a) has mentioned the fact that in crosses between self and
spotted forms, in mice, the spotting seemed modified or contaminated by the
cross. He gives no figures, however, in support of this statement and fails
to mention that the modification of spotted forms by crossing with self was
reported by MacCurdy and Castle (1907).

Dr. Castle and the writer have examined carefully the degree of pigmen-
tation of a race of pure Japanese spotted mice and have estimated the percent-
age of colored area on the dorsal surface; 72 animalswere thusexamined. The
average pigmentation was 32 per cent. The range of pigmentation was from
20 to 55 per cent. Animals of this pure Japanese race were crossed with a
uniform self-pigmented race of homozygous dilute brown animals, known to
produce no spotted or albino young. F from these animals consisted of all self
pigmented young showing no spots of white. Certain of these /; animals were
crossed inter se to obtain F2, others were crossed back with females of the pure
Japanese race.

In the first case F', was found to consist of 45 self animals (no spots) and 21
animals having some white hairs or spots on the dorsal surface. The 3 to 1
ratio is here approximated, the exact theoretical expectation being 49.5 self
to 16.5 spotted. The extracted spotted animals differ widely from the original
Japanese race from which they inherited the spotted-coat character. A com-
parison of the two categories of spotted forms (together with the back cross,
which will be treated later) will be seen in the following table:

Range of in-
Average aa :

No. of percentage Lonnie a

spotted of dorsal | ? SP aa, sa
individuals.| surface 2 nee
pigmented. | _.Surace

pigmented.
(1) Japanese........ 72 32 20 to 55
(Qi Foc caave crea tsk 21 85.3 50 to 99
(3) Back cross...... 47 60.2 40 to 99
(4) Back cross F2... 19 70.4 47 to 85

44 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

From this table it will beseen that the spotted individuals of F, have been
contaminated by the cross, having their dorsal pigmentation increased on the
average more than 50 per cent over the average of the pure Japanese race.
The range of the spotted forms in F. is also very different from that in the
Japanese race. There are no F2 animals within 18 per cent of the average grade
of the Japanese mice (82 per cent); also there is only one F2 animal out of 21
that is as lightly pigmented as the darkest of the Japanese race.

The back cross, between F; animals and individuals from the pure Jap-
anese race, we should expect to give spotted and self animals in a 1 : 1 ratio. -
The spotted animals, on a basis of contamination, should not be so extensively
modified as in the F, animals; that is, their degree of dorsal pigmentation
should be less. There have been 96 animals produced in this back cross, of
which 49 are self and 47 spotted, showing that “‘spotting” and “‘self”’ are still
behaving as a pair of allelomorphic characters. The spotted animals from this
cross—see above table, (3)—show an average of 60.2 per cent of the dorsal
surface pigmented; their range is from 40 to 99 per cent. This coincides
qualitatively with the expectation.

One more cross may be recorded. Certain of the 49 selfs produced by the
back cross were bred tinier se, thus producing a generation which may be desig-
nated as ‘‘back cross Fs.’’ Spotted animals resulting from this cross, on the
theory of contamination, should show a degree of dorsal pigmentation between
that of the first F, (85.3 per cent) and of the back cross (60.2 per cent). Asa
matter of fact the results show that their average pigmentation is 70.4 per cent.

ASSOCIATION OF CHARACTERS.

The question naturally arises as to whether the various characters are
completely independent of each other or whether coupling or gametic associ-
ation of any sort exists between some of them. Morgan (19116) has observed
in Drosophila certain results best explained on an hypothesis of ‘“ association”’
of certain characters in the gamete. It remains to be seen whether any such
“‘association”’ of characters exists in mice. For this purpose the writer has
tabulated the results of four crosses:

I. Cross 10a. Wiip Buack Acouti (Mus muscutus) Crossep wita DinuTe Brown.

The black-agouti parent possesses factors B =black, A =agouti, and D =
density. The dilute-brown parent lacks the factors B, A, and D. F resem-
bles the wild parent. In F. we expect 8 classes, as follows:

(1) Black agouti =BrBAD* (5) Brown =BrD
(2) Black =BrBD (6) Dilute brown agouti =BrAd
(3) Brown agouti =BrAD (7) Dilute black =BrBd
(4) Dilute black agouti =BrBAd (8) Dilute brown =Brd

*All animals in this cross possess the general color factor Y, and the factor for fullness
of black and brown pigmentation, P. They are therefore omitted from the formule for
purpose of simplification.

ASSOCIATION OF CHARACTERS. 45

On an hypothesis of association we should expect types (1) and (8) to be
in excess of the numbers called for by random segregation. The experimental
results are:

@) | (2) | @) | (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Dilute Dilute | Dilute | Dilute
BAg.. Bik. | BrAg.| BAg.| Brown.| BrAg. | Bik. Br.
Observed............. 20 9 7 9 0 4 4 2
Expected on a basis of
random segregation.| 23 i eee 7.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.0

The sum of classes (1) and (8) on a basis of random segregation is 24. The
observed number is less by 2, showing no signs of association of the characters
A, B, and D,

II. Cross 10. Pinx-Eyrep Buack Acouti Crossep wita DiLuTE Brown AGootti.

The pink-eyed black agouti parent possesses B (black), D (density), and
lacks P (fullness of black and brown pigmentation, dark eye). The dilute
brown agouti parent is of the formula dP, lacking the factor for density but
possessing that for darkeye. 1 isindistinguishable from the wild black agouti
(Mus musculus).

Pink-eyed black agouti BrpBD x dilute-brown agouti BrPd.

F, Black agouti, BBr.PpDd F, (5) Pink-eyed brown agouti, BrpDA

F, (1) Black agouti, BrBPDA (6) Pink-eyed dilute-black agouti, BrBpdA
(2) Brown agouti, BrPDA (7) Dilute-brown agouti, BrPdA
(3) Pink-eyed black agouti, BBrpDA (8) Pink-eyed dilute-brown agouti, BrpdA

(4) Dilute black agouti, BrBPdA

Classes (3) and (7) should be in excess if there is any association. The
experimental results follow:

(4)

| (1)
dBag.

BAg.

(5) (6) (7) (8)
pBrAg.| pdBag. | dBrag. | pdBrag.

(2) | (3)
BrAg. | pBag.

|
Observed............. 40 13 12 18 3 3 5 2

Expected on a basis of
random segregation.| 40.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 1.5

The sum of classes (3) and (7) on a basis of random segregation is 18, the
observed number in the classes is 17; again no evidence of association.

III. Cross 66. PinK-EYED Buack CrossED wiTH Brown.

The pink-eyed black parent possesses the factor B but lacks P and is there-
fore Bp; the brown parent lacks B but possesses P.

Parents black Bp x brown P.

F, Black BPp. F, (1) Black BP,
(2) Pink-eyed black Bp, (3) Brown P, (4) Pink-eyed brown p.

46 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

On a basis of association of characters both classes (2) and (3) should be
in excess. The observed result follows:

Classes. Pe Pink-ayed ee Pink oyed
"| black. wn. | brown.
Observed sensu cusceuaeeamtaw stacks ame ee 199 75 61 19
Expected on basis of random segregation..... 199 66.3 66.3 22.1

It will be seen that while type (2), pink-eyed black, is slightly in excess,
the browns (which must also on the association hypothesis be in excess) are not,
The sum of classes (2) and (3) is 136, while on the supposition of random segre-
gation we should expect 132.6.

IV. Cross 96. Brown Crossep witH Pinx-Eyep Dituts-Brown.
Brown possesses both factors D and P; pink-eyed dilute brown has neither
of them and is dp in formula.

Brown DP x Pink-eyed dilute brown dp.

F, Brown, DdPp. F, (1) Brown, DP, (2) Dilute brown, dP,
(3) Pink-eyed brown, Dp, (4) Pink-eyed dilute brown, dp.

On an association hypothesis both classes (1) and (4) should be in excess.

a | @ | @) 5 WN galas
Pink-eyed| UM ©
Classes. Brown. | Dilute | Pink-eyed| dilute Pee
brown.| brown. | brown. | 2” .
Observed....... Bil esatdhaescrend Gousencers 49 21 3 1 50
Expected on a basis of random seg-
NOCMNOM 62 oc cscetaiua inane nemeeas 41.4 13.8 13.8 4.6 46

The sum of classes (1) and (4) is only 4 in excess of the expectation on a
basis of random segregation. This may be considered as showing no associ-
ation, because class (4) is not in excess of the expectation. If now we add
together the numbers of individuals observed in the classes that should show
‘“‘association,’”’ if it exists, we have 225, while the number called for by the
mendelian hypothesis of random segregation is 220.6, a striking approximation
to the observed numbers. We may then conclude that these experiments show
no sign of association in the gametes between the factors D, P, A, or B or
between the four conditions characteristic of their absence.

PART II. EXPERIMENTAL DATA.
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS.

Before giving in detail the matings made, a few general facts may be
stated. In the course of the experiments noted here, more than 10,500 animals
have been raised. The independence of all the factors given in this paper has
been made certain from breeding tests. The results may first be considered in
a general way which may serve, for the present, to show that the factors in-
cluded in this paper exist as units in inheritance. We may best consider the
yellow and non-yellow forms under different headings. For non-yellow mice,
the results given here are largely corroborative of evidence previously given by
Cuénot, Bateson, Durham, and other investigators.

In expressing the gametic or zygotic formule of the various types we
employ a slight modification of the two systems most frequently used. Thus,
when a given factor is known to be absent, itssymbol is omiited from the formula.
For example, the gametic formula of homozygous brown-pigmented animals is
given as YBrDP, the zygotic formula Y2Br2D,P2. Albinos, which are gameti-
cally homozygous brown animals, would differ merely in that the color pro-
ducer Y is absent; they would, therefore, have the gametic formula BrDP and
the zygotic formula Br2D2P:. If the original brown race had been hetero-
zygous in the color factor Y, its zygotic formula would be YBr.D2P2 and the
gametes that could be formed would be obviously YBrDP and BrDP.

If, however, we are dealing with such a pair of characters as “‘dark-eye”’
P and “pink-eye”’ p, we are not justified in supposing an absence of P in the
pink-eyed forms. We merely know that an hypostatic modification of P has
occurred, and this is best designated by p. If now we have a homozygous
brown animal, with the zygotic formula Y2Br2D2P2, we may designate the homo-
zygous pink-eyed brown as Y2Br2Dep2. The dark-eyed brown heterozygous in
P would then be Y2Br.D,Pp and would form two sorts of gametes YBrDP and
YBrDp.

It is interesting to note that the system employed by the foremost expo-
nents of the presence-and-absence hypothesis really hints at the presence of two
conditions, the one (B) epistatic to the other (b). Onthe other hand, Castle, who
does not follow so implicitly the limits of the presence-and-absence hypothesis,
adopts a system of notation which, in the case of certain characters, indicates
the hypostatic condition by the absence of any symbol to designate it.

The excellent comparative study by Cuénot (1911) has served to make
clear many debated points due to variations in systems of notation, and it is
therefore with some doubt as to its advisability that the writer advances still a
different one. It seems, however, exceeding present knowledge to denote by
the same system characters which may obviously be absent and those whose

absence is far from proved.
47

48 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

There should exist, according to the hypothesis advanced above, 81 types
of zygotes in the non-yellow self-colored races. A similar number of types of
albinos should also be formed. In the experiments here recorded noeffort has
been made to obtain a large number of types of zygotes, yet 58 of the 81 pure
colored types have been met with. The occurrence of these 58 types is assured
by breeding tests, but it is almost certain that all 81 types have occurred many
times in the writer’s experiments, since only a very small part of the animals
raised has been used for breeding.

A table follows showing the numbers of possible zygotic types, and the
number of the observed types in the 16 self-pigmented non-yellow color varie-
ties which are homozygous in the color-producer (Y).

Gametic formula. Description. Possible. | Observed.
YBrBDPA.......... Black agouti..: 2. .66ccscbcc es eeeeneees 16 8
YBrBdPA Dilute black agouti.................. 8 5
Pink-eyed black agouti............... 8 8
BGC, s.ie:5 -cjouseosntnatendes Oovrars ter eonsnetsvaratie Sls 8 5
Brown agouti............ccccee veces 8 5
Pink-eyed dilute black agouti......... 4 2
Pink-eyed brown agouti 4 3
Pink-eyed black.............. 4 3
Dilute brown agouti........ 4 2
Browlicsels spew mguawart atone 4 4
Dilute black... 4 4
Dilute brown ers 2 2
Pink-eyed brown................2004 2 2
Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti........ 2 2
Pink-eyed dilute black............... 2 2
Pink-eyed dilute brown............... 1 1
81 58

If yellow animals differ from the non-yellow by the presence of an epi-
static restriction factor, R, we should expect that the 81 zygotic types of non-
yellow mice would have their counterpart in the yellow series. Cuénot (1911)
recognizes this fact, but explains it in a slightly different way, which need not
be discussed here.

Yellow animals corresponding with 14 of the 16 non-yellow color varieties
have been recognized in breeding tests. The yellows which are potentially
dilute brown and those which are potentially pink-eyed dilute-brown agouti
are the only forms not as yet demonstrated by breeding tests. There is no
reason to suppose that these can not be produced, and it is almost certain that

they have occurred among my animals but have not happened to be chosen for
breeding.

The gametic and zygotic formule used in this part of the paper will be
identical with those employed in the first part. A set of abbreviations, given
on p. 50, will be used in tables. The results here tabulated follow the various
experiments through April 15, 1912.

COLOR VARIETIES OF MICE. 49

COLOR VARIETIES OF MICE.*

A. ExTenpEeD Series (RESTRICTION Factor ABSENT).
1. With the agouti pattern.

Color variety.

1 Black agouti, fig. Le iso packiGon Seenc eae Sek gece teak es YBrBDPA Black

2. Dilute black agouti, fig. 2......... 0... cece cee cece YBrBdPA AG ti

3. Pink-eyed black agouti, fig. 3............ 000. ccc e eee ees YBrBDpA { 280uu

4, Pink-eyed dilute black agouti, fig. 4..................0.. YBrBdpA } Sees

5. Brown agouti, fig. 5... 0.00... ccc ccc eee eee eee eee YBrDPA B

6. Dilitte Drown agouth, AE. Biiciee ie ccs sievscseeeessesenss YBrdPA oe

7, Pink-eyed brown agouti, fig. 7.. YBrDpA aeOULL

8. Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti, fig. 8. YBrdpA series

2, Without the agouti pattern.

Qe Blacks $129 pane Gantie Guy cic ats Sav des div ineee aud sanatd deen whe Leta oe YBrBDP
10.-Dilute: black; #ig..10s 3 s2gaus mens So vos pees Hees Gee 84 YBrBdP Black
11. Pink-eyed black, fig. 11. ........ 0. ccc ccc cece eee YBrBDp series
12. Pink-eyed dilute black, fig. 12.............. 00... cece eee YBrBdp
13: Brown, fF WS isiia ones wack ae alscie ane Pad aha a Oe Raa a ok YBrDP
14, Dilute brown, fig. 14......0.0..0.6000sc cece ewaneeeneesen YBrdP Brown
15. Pink-eyed brown, fig. 15............ 0.02 cece eee cena YBrDp series
16. Pink-eyed dilute brown, fig. 16..................0. eee eee YBrdp

B. Restrictep Series. ANIMALS IN THIS SERIES ALWAYS HETEROZYGOUS IN R.
Color variety.
17. Black-eyed yellow......... 00... cece c cece e eee YBrBDPAR
18. Black-eyed yellow, fig. 17...........-.---seseveveeees VErRDPR | Dark dyed
19. Brown-eyed yellow, fig.18...........0. ccc ceeeeeeeeees YBrDPAR [ tov sede
20. Brown-eyed yellow...........00. 00 ccc cece cee ence eee YBrDPR OW Berles
21. Dilute black-eyed yellow.............. 0.00 e eens YBrBdPAR
22, Dilute black-eyed yellow....... Sanne caren eat ete Verpare. | Davee
23. Dilute brown-eyed yellow. ..........0. 00 ccc e cece ee aes YBrdPAR Bae.
24, Dilute brown-eyed yellow, fig. 19...............0000 eee YBrdPR series
‘ Black, brown)
25. Pink-eyed yellow....................44. YBrBDpAR :
26. Pink-eyed yellow................0.000.. YBrBDpR na ras Pe,
‘ intense yel-
27. Pink-eyed yellow................-.-.-4. YBrDpAR oe sallow eee low series
28. Pink-eyed yellow....................005 YBrDpR ment only
29. Pink-eyed dilute yellow. ............064. YBrBdpAR [Black, brown
30. Pink-eyed dilute yellow................. YBrBdpR pi anak chs
ilute yellow

31. Pink-eyed dilute yellow... ...........064. YBrdpaAR | BLown anal series
32. Pink-eyed dilute yellow................. YBrdpR ment only

There are 32 pigmented varieties of mice which may be obtained in pure

races. The ‘‘restricted series,’ however, may be obtained pure in the sense
only that animals may be obtained which give merely the type of yellow
written before their gametic formula, and the single variety of the “extended”
series which the rest of their gametic constitution demands. Albino varieties
corresponding with these 32 colored forms are expected to occur and may be
produced at will. These albinos are distinguishable from one another only by
breeding tests, and it is therefore doubtful whether all the 32 varieties have
as yet been isolated.

*The factors T (total pigmentation) and S (self-pigmentation) are not included in these

formule.

50 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

In the following pages will be found a brief description of the various color
varieties, as they appear to the unaided eye, followed by a list of crosses made
with each color variety. In the tables it has been found expedient to use the
following abbreviations to designate in simpler form the color varieties, a list of
which has already been given:

B =black, p =pink-eyed, Y =yellow,
Br=brown, Ag =agouti, sY =sooty yellow,
d =dilute, W =white (albino), cY =cream yellow.

Thus, for example, pdBAg is equivalent to pink-eyed dilute black agouti, color
variety No. 4 of the extended series.

Unfortunately, in many of -the crosses the numbers of animals recorded
are small. Aberrations from the expected mendelian ratios of the color
classes may also be found in some cases; but an examination of these seems
to indicate that they would diminish with an increase in the number of animals
recorded.

EXTENDED SERIES.
I, Brack Acouti, YBrBDPA (Fria. 1).

The common coloration seen in the house-mouse (Aus musculus). Eyes black, ears darkly
pigmented, hairs on ventral surface tipped with dull-yellowish, then dark slaty to the
base. Tail dark-pigmented. Dorsal hairs tipped with black, then having a yellow
band and below that being slaty to their base. Such an arrangement produces the
“ticked” or “agouti” coat pattern. Tuft of hairs at the base of the ears yellowish—
a few light hairs on sides, flanks, and feet. Hairs around anus are light.

Black agouti x black agoutt.

Cross 1. Giving only BAg young; therefore one of the parents, at least, may be considered
homozygous black agouti, type 1 (extended series). The animals used in this cross
were descended from yellows.

Mating. Parents. BAg.

74 166 or 131 x 135.......
64 166 36185 5 < ssiestacin tons
82 164 or 131 x unmarked.
44 139 x 530.04B........
48 509.48 x 530.07B.....

e | _
Ql ceonn

Cross 2.5 Parents heterozygous in black. Y2Br2BD:P2A2 x Y2Br2BD.P2A42. Expectation,
3 BAg to 1 BrAg.

| |

Mating. | Parents. | BAg. | BrAg.

in : |
561 4914 or 4915 x 4913.. | 7 | 2

EXTENDED SERIES. 51

Cross 3. Parents heterozygous in colorfactorandinblack. YBr2BD:,P242 XY BrBD2P2Ae.
Expectation, 9 BAg, 3 BrAg, to 4W. The parents in this cross were derived from
yellows.

|
Mating. BrAg. W.

Parents. | BAg.

45 530.02B x176..... | 5 | 5 | 2

Cross 4. Parents heterozygous in black and density. Y.Br.BDdP2A; xY,Br,BDdP2A2.
Expectation, 9 BAg, 3 BrAg, 3 dBAg, 1 dBrAg.

Mating. | Parents. BAg.| BrAg. “ leBrAg.

|

‘ 4

Cross 5. Parents heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2B,D.PpA2 XY:Br2B2D.PpAz. Expec-
tation, 3 BAg to 1 pBAg.

25 530.6A x 530.54 .

|
|
a

el)

Mating. Parents. BAg.|pBAg.

134 673 x 671...; 8 2
138 672 x 671 ...| 10 1
18 3

Cross 6. Parents heterozygous in color factor, dark eye, and agouti. YBr.B,.D,PpAx
YBr.B,D,PpA. Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 B, 9 pBAg, 3 pB, 16 W.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| pB. |W.

404 2889 x unmarked....| 2 1 1

Cross 7. Parents heterozygousin black, dark eye, andagouti. Y2Br,BD,PpAxYBr.BD.,PpA.
Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 pBAg, 9 BrAg, 9 B, 3 pBrAg, 3 Br, 3 pB, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| BrAg.| B. | pBAg.| pBrAg.|Br.\pB | pBr.

163 545 x 546 5 5 3 3 = jean eee
119 547 x 546 5 1 2 1 ast 2 | 3s
175 548 x 546 7 3 2 3 aif 1) 1
116 545 or 548 x 546...| 6 3 2 or ig 2
140 545-547-548 x 546..| 16 6 1 2 3 1) 1
162 672-673 x 918 ..... 5 5 1 is 3 2)1
169 O17 KIS. aicarcae 4 = ws |

48 18 | 11 9 3 9); 4

52 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 8. Parents heterozygous in color factor, density, and dark eye. YBr2B,DdPpA, x
YBr.B,DdPpA:. Should give 27 BAg, 9 dBAg, 9 pBAg, 3 pdBAg, 16 W.

Mating. Parents. BAg.\dBAg.|pBAg.|pdBAg.| W.
340 | 2756, 2760 x 2757 .....| 2 2: 1 1 1
462 3120 x unmarked ....| 3 2 he :

5 4 1 1 1

Cross 9. Parents heterozygous in density, dark eye, and agouti. Y,Br.B,.DdPpAx
Y2Br2B,.DdPpA. Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 pBAg, 9B, 9dBAg,3 pdBAg, 3dB, 3 pB,1 paB.

Mating. Parents. BAg.|dBAg.| B. | pBAg.| pB. |pdBAg.\dB.| pdB.

403 Unmarked x unmarked..| 9 5 9 1 2

Cross 10. Parents heterozygous in black, density, and dark eye. Y2Br,BDdPpA; x
Y2Br:BDdPpAz. Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 pBAg, 9 BrAg, 9 dBAg, 3 pdBAg, 3 pBrAg,
3 dBrAg, 1 pdBrAg.

Mating.| Parents. |BAg.|dBAg.|pBAg.| BrAg. | dBrAg.|pdBAg.| pBrAg.| pdBrAg. | p-?
338 | 1290x1280) 9 | 1] .. 2 2 i » a ah.
199 | 1291x1289} 5 | 7 3 4 1 1 1 ih aes
203 1293 x 1289 2 1 3 2 as
241 1291 — 1293

x 1289..| 3 3 1 1 1
275 1290-1291,
1293 x 1289] 17 4 5 2 1 2 1 1 1
260 1539 x 1289} 4 2 1 2 ye, 2
40 | 18 12 13 5 3 3 2 4

Cross 10a. Parents heterozygousin black, density, and agouti Y,Br,BDdP,AX Y.Br.BDaP,A.
Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 dBAg, 9 BrAg, 9 B, 3 dBrAg, 3 dB, 3 Br, 1 dBr.

Mating. Parents. BAg.|dBAg. Brag. B. | dBrAg.|dB | Br.|dBr.
A 2 S6 xS5xS88.; 7 3 4 3 = 6%
AZ S19x S8..... 10 6 2 4 2 2 1
A8 S18xS8..... 3 1 1 1 -
Al0 S98xS5..... = 1 1 2 1
20 9 7 | 9; 4 |41/0 | 2

Black agouti x dilute black agouti.

Cross 11. Giving only BAg young, both parents homozygous. Y2Br.B.D,P,A2x
Y2Br.Bed2P2A..

Mating. | Parents. | Bag.

67 | 131 x 135..| 8

EXTENDED SERIES. 53

Cross 11a. Black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with dilute
black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti. Y2Br:BDdP,A x Y2Br,Bd,P2A.
Expectation, 9 BAg, 9 dBAg, 3 BrAg, 3 dBrAg, 3 B, 3 dB, 1 Br, 1 dBr.

Mating. | Parents. | BAg. | dBAg. | BrAg. B.

All

$105 x 5, 3 | 1 | 1 | 1

Cross 12. Black agouti, heterozygous in color factor, black, dark eye, and agouti, crossed
with dilute black agouti heterozygous in color factor, black, dark eye, and agouti.
YBr.BD.PpA xX YBr,.Bd,PpA. Expectation, 81BAg, 27B, 27 pBAg, 27 BrAg, 9 Br,
9 pB, 9 pBrAg, 3 pBr, 64 W.

Mating. pB.| Br. W.

Parents. BAg. | BrAg. | B. | pBAg.

pBrAg. | pBr.

422 405 «2404 or ele “| 7 als

Black agouti x brown agoutt.

Cross 13. Black agouti, heterozygous in black and density, crossed with brown agouti hetero-
zygous in density. Y.Br,BDdP2A2 x Y2,Br,DdP2,A2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 BrAg,
1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg. | BrAg. | dBAg. | dBrAg.
507 Unmarked x 3114........ 1 3 1 2
374 3116 x unmarked........ 3 1 1 Bt
464 Unmarked x 3114-3115... 6 a 1 1

10 11 3 3

Black agouti x black.

Cross 14. Black agouti heterozygous in the color factor crossed with black heterozygous in
the color factor. YBr2B.D.,P2A: x YBr.B,D.P:. Expectation, 3 BAg, 1 W.

Mating. | Parents. BAg. W.

410

Unmarked x unmarked... . 5 | 1

Cross 15. Black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous black.
Y.Br.B,D2P2A x Y.Bre2BoD2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1B.

Mating. Parents. BAg. B.

576 7215 x 7216....
A5 S59 x S54.....
Al3 | S59 xS5......

Rob
me or

11 10

54 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 16. Black agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti crossed with black heterozygous
indarkeye. Y2Br2B,D2,PpA xY2Br.B,D.Pp. Expectation,3 BAg,3B,1pBAg,1pB.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B. |\pBAg.| pB.
132 ANT SAGE ics ate wromaa-e ae 1 1 2 2
128 449 x 454 2... ee 3 3 a 1
129 B52: ASE 5 stern gerade ee 4 1

97 447, 449 x 454.......... 3 i... 1
179 447-449-452 x 454..... 2 5 —
165 447 919 .... 6... s ee. 8 5 1
177) | 452 x 919.2... ee, 2 2 a

19 | 20 2 6

Cross 17. Black agouti heterozygous in black, dark eye, and agouti, crossed with black hete-
rozygousinblackanddarkeye. Y2Br.BD,.PpA xY2Br.BD,Pp. Expectation,9BAg,
9 B, 3 pBAg, 3 pB, 3 BrAg, 3 Br, 1 pBrAg, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B. |pBAg.| BrAg.| Br. |pBrAg.| pB. | pBr.

130 551 x 553....... 1 fee ae es 1 es a a
107 551 x 671 ...... i 3 6 “8 ks és 1 spe
3385 2461 x 2122....| 3 4 1 1 3 1 - 2
324 2460 x 2122....) 5 4 2 as 1 1 a

9 | 11 9 1 5 2 1 2

Cross 17a. Black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti, crossed with black
heterozygous in density and black. Y2Br.BDdP2:A xY:Br2BDdP:. Expectation,
9 BAg, 9 B, 3 dBAg, 3 dB, 3 BrAg, 3 Br, 1 dBrAg, 1 dBr.

Mating.| Parents. |BAg.| B. | BrAg.| Br. |dBAg.|dBrAg,.| dB. | dBr.

A6 S6x S35...) 2 | 5 3 2 1 se 1 1

Black agouti x brown.

Cross 18. Black agouti heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous brown.
Y.Br2BD2P2A2 XY2Br2D2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 BrAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| Brag.

526 5948 x 4920....| 3 3

Cross 18a. Black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti crossed with homozygous brown.
Y2BroBD2P2A XY2Br2D.P2 Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 BrAg, 1B, 1 Br.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| BrAg.| B.| Br.

Al4 | 86xBlz—3001....) .. | 2 1) 2

EXTENDED SERIES. 55

Cross 19. Black agouti heterozygous in color factor, black, and agouti crossed with brown
heterozygous in the color factor. YBr,BD,P2:A xYBr2D:P:. Expectation, 3 BAg,
3 B, 3 BrAg, 3 Br, 4 W.

Parents. | BAg.

|

BrAg.| B.| Br.

Black agoutt x dilute brown.

Cross 20. Black agouti heterozygous in color factor, black, and density crossed with dilute
brown heterozygous in color factor. YBr,BDdP,A: XYBr.d,P,. Expectation,3 BAg,
3 dBAg, 3 BrAg, 3 dBrAg, 4 W.

Parents. Pao dBAg.| BrAg.|dBrAg.| W.

559 | ~25 x —89...... | 1 2 2 1 1

Cross 20a. Homozygous black agouti x homozygous dilute brown.
Y2Br.B2D2P2A2 XY¥2Brod2P2. Expectation, all BAg.

|
Mating. | Parents. | BAg.

Al S2xS1...|. 8

Cross 20r. Black agouti heterozygous in black and density crossed with homozygous dilute
brown. Y2BrBDdP2A2 XY2Brod,P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1dBAg,1BrAg/1dBrAg.

Mating. - Parents. | BAg.| BrAg.|dBAg.|dBrAg.
Al2 | 309 x Blz x 3012.| 2 én 2 2
Al5 | 381 x Blz x 3012.) 1 au 2% 2

3 “1 2 4

Cross 20c. Black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with homozy-
gous dilute brown. Y2Br,BDdP.A x Y2Br.d:P2. Expectation, 1BAg, 1 BrAg,1dBAg,
1 B, 1 dBrAg, 1 Br, 1 dB, 1 dBr.

Mating. Parents. | BAg.| BrAg.| B. | dBAg.|\dBrAg.| Br. | dB. | dBr.
A- 373-374 x 85...| 2 2 ba 1 1 ae 1 2
A4 S86 x dil. Br..... 1 1 4 1 3 1 ie
AQ S62xS5....... 1 1 1 1 1 2 1

| 4 | 4 | 5 3 s | 2) 4.13

56 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Black agouti x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 21. Black agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti, crossed with homozygous pink-

eyed brown. Y2Br,B,D,PpA x Y2Br.D2p.. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg,1B,1 pB.,

Parents. | BAg. | pBAg. B. pB.
3 6

Mating.
308 | 3305 x p3309...| 3 7

Black agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown.
Cross 214. Homozygous black agouti crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown,

Y.Br2B,D,P2A2 X Y2Brodep2. Expectation, all BAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg.

630 7854 x Vermont BAg.

626 p. dil. Br. x Vermont BAg . ap
633 7855 x Vermont BAg.| 7

42

Cross 21z. Black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with homozy-
gous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br.BDdP2A x Y2Brod2p, Expectation, 1 BAg,

1 BrAg, 1 B, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 Br, 1 dB, 1 dBr.

Mating. Parents. BAg. | BrAg.| B. |\dBAg.|dBrAg.| Br. | dB.| dBr.
A3 Unmarked x S5.......... 3 ae 2 3 1 3 1
599 Unmarked x unmarked...| 1 1 1 1 3 1 | 2

4 1 3 4 4 4 | 2 1

II. Ditute Buack Acouti, YBrBdPA (Fic. 2).

Eyes black, ears moderately pigmented, ventral hairs light slate colored with a yellowish

Tail moderately pigmented. Dorsal hairs showing the “agouti” pattern dis-

tinge.
Tuft of light hairs present

tinctly but somewhat faded, or washed out in appearance.
at base of the ears and around the anus.

Dilute black agouti x dilute black agouti.
Cross 22. Both parents homozygous. Y:Br,B.d2P2A2. Expectation, all dBAg.

Mating. Parents. dBAg.
621 7477 x unmarked...; 12
Cross 22a. Both parents heterozygous in black, dark eye, and agouti. Y2,Br.Bd.PpA.
Expectation, 27 dBAg, 9 dB, 9 pdBAg, 9 dBrAg, 3 dBr, 3 pdB, 3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr.
Mating. Parents. dBAg.|dBrAg. |\dB.| pdBAg.| pdBrAg.| pdB. |dBr.| pBr.
629 7695 x 7690-91-92. .| 9 2 1 1 1 1 1
642 7694 x 7690........ ai i 1 2 1 1
9 2 2 3 2 1 1 0

EXTENDED SERIES. 57

Dilute black agouti x black.

Cross 228. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous black.
Y2Br,Bod2P.A XY2Br2B:D.P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B.

562 6406 x 5881 ...| 5 6

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black.
Cross 23. Bothparentshomozygous. Y2Br,B2d,P2A2 XY2Br.B,D.p,._ Expectation, all BAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg.

323 p845 x 1871....| 8

Cross 24. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black, dark eye, and agouti crossed with
pink-eyed black heterozygous in black. Y2Br,.Bd,PpA XY2Br2BD2p2. Expectation,
3 BAg, 3 B, 3 pBAg, 3 pB, 1 BrAg, 1 Br, 1 pBrAg, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B. Bro Br. |pBAg.| pB. | pBrAg.| pBr.

372 p2688 x 2488...) 1 3 | 1 E tee ai 4

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute black.
Cross 25. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.Bod,P2A2 xY2Br2Bed2p2. Expectation, alldBAg.

Mating. Parents. dBAg.

416 p3627 x unmarked....| 5

Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti.

Cross 26. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with pink-eyed black

agouti heterozygous in density. Y2Br.B.d.PpA2 x Y2Br2B,Ddp.A2. Expectation,
1 BAg, 1 pBAg, 1 dBAg, 1 pdBAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| pBAg.| dBAg.| pdBAg.

368 2255 x pl775..| .. 1 1

Dilute black agoutt x pink-eyed dilute black agouti.
Cross 27. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-
eyed dilute black agouti. Y2Br2Bod,PpA2 x Y2Br.Bedzp2A2, Expectation, 1 dBAg,

1 pdBAg.
Mating. Parents. dBAg.| pdBAg.
522 p unmarked x unmarked..| 3 2
386 2254 x p2339.............. 1 4
560 | p4060 x 4244.00.00... 0... 2 se
6 6

58 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Dilute black agouti x brown.

Cross 28. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous brown.
Y.BroBidoP 2A x Y.BroDoP >. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B.

227 Unmarked x unmarked ..| 3 1

Dilute black agouti x pink-cyed dilute brown.
Cross 284. Both parents homozygous. Y.Br:B2d2P2A2 x Y2Brodxp2. Expectation, all dBAg.

Mating. Parents. dBAg.

586 Unmarked x unmarked..
610 TATT X T476. ee
615 7545 x 7608... 2.60.00.
613 Unmarked x unmarked..| 1

00 00%

Cross 288. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous pink-eyed
dilute brown. Y2Br2Bod,P2A x Y2Brodop:,. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dB.

Mating. Parents. dBAg.|\dB.
598 Unmarked x unmarked...| 4 3
617 Unmarked x unmarked...| 4 2

8 5

Cross 28c. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed
dilute brown. Y2Br.Bd2P2A2 X Y2Brodep,. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg.

Mating. Parents. | dBAg. | dBrAg.

585 Unmarked x unmarked .. 4 | 4

Cross 28p. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti, crossed with homozygous
pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br.Bd,P:A x Y2Bredzp,. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dB,
1 dBrAg, 1 dBr.

|
| Mating. Parents. dBAg.| dB. |dBrAg.| dBr.

| 591 Unmarked x unmarked....} .. 3 “4 1

EXTENDED SERIES. 59

II. Pinx-rvep Biacx Acovuti, YBBrDpA (Fie. 3).

Eyes very deep pink. Ears apparently unpigmented. Hairs on ventral surface dull yellow
with bluish base, showing the presence of the agouti pattern. Dorsal hair closely
resembling that of the dark-eyed brown agouti form to the unaided eye. More yellow,
however, seems to be present in the coat, though it has been seen that this is not
because of an increased amount of yellow pigment. There is a tuft of light hairs at
the base of the ears. The hairs directly around the anus, however, resemble the other
ventral hairs so closely as to be indistinguishable from them.

Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti.

Cross 29. One or both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B,Dxp.A2 x Y2Br,B,D.p,A2.. Expec-
tation, all pBAg.

Mating. Parents. pBAg.
112 560 x 559....0.0... 15
136 690 x 691 ........ 7
153 689 x 691 ........ 5
139 692 x 691......... 16
190 690-692 x 691..... 15

58

Cross 30. Both parents heterozygous in black. Y2.Bro2BD.p.A, x Y:Br,BD2p2,A,. Expecta-
tion, 3 pBAg, 1 pBrAg.

Mating. Parents. pBAg.| pBrAg.
120 58K 5500 i bene nas 19 1
101 558 or 560 x 559... . 3 4

22 5

Cross 31. Both parents heterozygous in black, density, and agouti. Y2Br.BDdp.A x
Y.Br,2BDdp,A. Expectation, 27 pBAg, 9 pdBAg, 9 pBrAg, 9 pB, 3 pdB, 3 pdBrAg,
3 pBr, 1 pdBr.

pB. | pdBrAg.| pdB. | pBr. | pdBr.

Mating. Parents. pBAg.| pdBAg. | pBrAg.

300 2018 x 2017....| 17 2 | 6 | 3

Pink-eyed black agouti x black.

Cross 32. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous black.
Y.BrB,DoprA XY2BrB2D2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B.
152 416 x p409..... 1 2
83 163 x p412..... 2 3

60 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed black.
Cross 33. Both parentshomozygous. Y2Br,B,Dop.A2 X Y2Br,B,D2p2. Expectation, all pBAg.

Mating. Parents. pBAg.
171 pl049 x p898..... 4
174 p985 x p898...... 4

8

Cross 34. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti crossed with pink-eyed
black heterozygous in black. Y2Br,BD.p,A x Y2BreBD2p:. Expectation, 3 pBAg,
3 pBrAg, 1 pB, 1 pBr.

1

Mating. | Parents. pB Ag pB.\pBrAg.| pBr.

|
84 pats xp. 2 | 2 | 1 |

Pink-eyed black agoutt x dilute black.

Cross 35. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density crossed with dilute black hetero-
zygous in dark eye. Y.Br.B,Ddp.A2 XY2Br,Bod.Pp. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 dBAg,
1 pBAg, 1 pdBAg.

Mating. dBAg.|pBAg.| pdBAg.

Parents. | BAg.

413 | 3062 x p1922....

aie) eal ff

Pink-eyed black agouti x dilute brown agouti.

Cross 36. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.B,DoprA2 X Y2Brod2P,A2. Expectation,
BAg only.

Mating. | Parents. | BAg.

148 | 682 x pool... 15

Cross 37. Homozygous pink-eyed black agouti crossed with dilute brown agouti hetero-
a zygous indarkeye. Y2Br2,B,Dzp2,A2 x Y2Brod,PpA2. Expectation, 1 BAg,1 pBAg.

Mating. Parents. | BAg.|pBAg.

387 p unmarked x 1873..... | 4 2

Cross 38. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density and agouti crossed with dilute
brown agouti heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br.B,Ddp.A x Y2Brod2P2,A. Expectation,
3 BAg, 3 dBAg, 1 B,14dB.

Mating. Parents. | Bag. dBAg. | B. | dB.

506 plidl x 4608... 6 | 3 }1| 1

EXTENDED SERIES

61

Cross 39. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black and density crossed with dilute

brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye.

Y2Br.BDdp2A2 X Y2Brod,PpAz.

Expecta-

tion, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg, 1 dBAg, 1 BrAg, 1 pBrAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 pdBAg, 1 pdBrAg.

Mating. Parents. BAg.|pBAg.| dBAg.| BrAg.| pBrAg.| dBrAg. | pdBAg.| pdBrAg.
369 punmarked x 1873...) 10 - se 5 = ai xe
302 p1923-p1874 x 1873..| 13 15 1 2 a a 38
344 =| p1875 x 1873........ 1 os 4 2 5 4 1

24 15 5 9 5 4 1

Pink-eyed black agouti x brown.
Cross 40. Both parentshomozygous. Y2Br2B.D.p.42 x Y2Br.D2P;. Expectation, only BAg.

Mating Parents. BAg.
252 p1416 x 1561....... 5
187 p1125 x 1527....... 4
286 p1533 X 1405....... 8
202 71396 X unmarked..| 8
223 71368 x unmarked..| 5
198 p1297 x unmarked..| 5
207 1403 x p1099...... 2
206 572 x pl099...... 6
235 1403 x p691l....... 16

59

Cross 41, Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous brown.

Cross 42. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black

Y2Br2B2DoprA X YoBroD2Po.

Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B.
249 p1326 x 1674..........65- 2 1
228 pl062 x 1674............- 14 10
219 p1060 x 1674............. 8 3
279 p1328 x 1561............. 3 1
193 p1l48 x 1527...... Se 1 2
209 p1330 x 1404............. 2 2
213 1570 x p1120............ 3 2
161 646 x p1061............ 1 3
239 1488 x p844..........5.. 4 3
227 Unmarked x unmarked..| 3 1

41 28

and agouti crossed with homozy-
gous brown. Y2Br2BD2p2A xY2Br2D2P2 Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B,1 BrAg, 1 Br.

Mating. Parents. BAg.| B. | BrAg.| Br.
253 p1443 x 1405..| .. 1 1 2
332 pl972 x 2071..| 4 2 2 ey

4 3 3 2

62 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 43. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with brown heterozygous
in dark eye. Y2Br,B,Dyp.A x Y2Br.D,Pp. Expectation, 1 BAg,1B,1pBAg, 1 pB.

Mating. Parents. BAg.|pBAg.| B. [Be

182 1097 x 1526...' 1 8 gael
181 1098 x 1526...) 14 11 1 1
231 1125 x 1526...; 2 1 we | ws

| 1) 2

Cross 44. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density crossed with brown heterozygous
in density. Y2Br,B,Ddp.A2 x Y2Br.DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 1 dBAg.

Mating. Parents. | BAg.|dBAg.

298 | 2179 x 1922.. / é 9

Cross 45. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with
brown heterozygous in density. Y.Br.BDdp,A x Y.Br,DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg,
3 BrAg, 3 B, 3 Br, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 dB, 1 dBr.

Parents.

Mating. BAg.| BrAg. mt Br... “ABAg. dBrAg. t,o.

Baie a

Cross 46. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density and agouti, crossed with brown
heterozygous in density. Y.Br.B,.Ddp,A x Y2Br,DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 B,
1 dBAg, 1 dB.

|
229 |s710 x15... - 1

Mating. Parents. BAg.|dBAg.| B. |dB.

317 1326 x 1404..... 5 2 4
221 1332 x 1404..... 3 4 0
291 1326-32 x 1404..) 1 2 4

[oe bo

IV. Pinx-nvep Ditute Buiacx Acouti, YBBrdpA (Fic. 4).

Eyes pink; ears, feet, and tail apparently unpigmented. The color of the coat is markedly
washed-out in quality. The agouti pattern is distinguishable, but not easily so, because
of the “‘streaky”’ due to the absence of intense pigmentation. The whole coat resembles
a little that of a very light dilute dark-eyed brown agouti. The ear tufts of yellowish
hair are prominent. There are no crosses to be included under this variety, though
some in which one parent is pink-eyed dilute black agouti have been recorded under the
preceding varieties.

V. Brown Acouti, YBrDPA (Fia. 5).

Eyes a deep rich brown, ears brown pigmented. Hairs on ventral surface yellowish on tip,
dull brown at base. Tail brown pigmented. Dorsal hairs brown at the tip, then a
yellow band, and finally dull brown to the base, giving the unmistakable “ticked” or
“agouti” coat. Whiskers and feet are brown. Light hairs around the anus and ai the
base of the ears.

EXTENDED SERIES. 63

Brown agouti x brown agouti.

Cross 47. One or both parents homozygous. Y2Br2D,P:A2 x Y2Br2D,P2A2. Expectation,
all brown agouti.

Mating. Parents. BrAg.

124 ODT 272 ia ce ihre wie bon wna 6

86 SOR KM O12 se elect nin Si aitiat 18
143 DOL DTD ors 2 assis vars aod fotos 6
414 Unmarked x unmarked.... 7

37

Cross 48. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br2D,P24A x Y2Br2D.P,A. Expecta-
tion, 3 BrAg, 1 Br.

Mating. Parents. | Brag. Bee
|

104

586 x 588..... | 3 1

Cross 49. Both parents heterozygous in density and the color factor. YBr2DdP2A2 x
YBr.DdP2A2. Expectation, 9 BrAg, 3 dBrAg, 4 W.

Mating. Parents. BrAg.|dBrAg. | Ww.

89 | 611.1A x 411.) 3 2
|

Cross 49a. Both parents heterozygous in density, dark eye, and agouti. Y2Br,DdPpA.
Expectation, 27 BrAg, 9 dBrAg, 9 pBrAg, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 3 pdBrAg, 3 dBr, 1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. BrAg.|dbBrAg.|pBrAg.| Br.|dBr.| pBr. | pdBrAg.| pdBr.
631 7679 x 7678-80. ... 6 1 1 3
643 7663 x 7660....... 2 1 J i
644 7664 x 7662....... 2 2. 1
10 4 3 3

Brown agouti x pink-eyed brown agouti.
Cross 50. Brown agouti heterozygous in dark-eye, color factor, and agouti crossed with
pink-eyed brown agouti heterozygous in the color factor and agouti. YBr2D.PpA x
YBr.D.p,A. Expectation, 9 BrAg, 9 pBrAg, 3 Br, 3 pBr, 8 W.

Mating. Parents. BrAg.|Br.|pBrAg.| pBr. |W.
407 punmarked x 2735....| 8 4 2 2 3
365 2187 x 2735.......... re 1 2 ne 1
350 p2138 x 2735.......... 1 2 1

8 6 6 2 5

64 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Brown agouti x brown.

Cross 51. Homozygous brown agouti crossed with homozygous brown. Y2Br.D.P.A2 x
Y°Br2D2P2. Expectation, all BrAg.

Mating.| Parents. | BrAg.

96 488 x 162...| 6

Cross 52. Brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti crossed with brown heterozy-
gousindarkeye. Y2BrD:PpA xY2Br.D.Pp. Expectation, 3 BrAg, 3 Br, 1 pBrAg,

1 pBr.
Mating. Parents. BrAg.|Br.| pBrAg.| pBr.
405 Unmarked x unmarked.) .. 3 1
305 2129 x 2180. ........... 6 9 5 2
347 Unmarked x 2130...... 4 6 4 3

10 | 18 10 5

Brown agouti x pink-eyed brown.
Cross 53. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.D.P2A2 x Y2Br2Dzp2._ Expectation, all BrAg.

Mating.| Parents.

Brag.

7 am
| 359 pea 2B 4

Brown agouti x dilute black.

Cross 54. Brown agouti heterozygous in density and agouti, crossed with dilute black
heterozygous in black. Y.Br.DdP,A x Y2.Br.Bd2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 dBAg,
1 B,14dB, 1 BrAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 Br, 1 dBr.

Mating. B. | Br.

Parents. ‘Bao dBAg.| BrAg.\dBrAg.

|
| |
527 | 5381 x 5203... 6 3 1 23 [od | a

Brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown.
Cross 54a. Both parents homozygous, Y2Br.D.,P,A2 x Y2Bridzp2. Expectation, all BrAg.

|
| Mating. Parents. | BrAg.
|
595 Unmarked x unmarked....| 19
603 7505 x 7501...........00.. es
| 26

VI. Dinute Brown Acovuti, YBrdPA (Fie. 6).

Eyes brown; ears, feet, and tail lightly pigmented with brown. Ventral hairs dull fawn

Dorsal hairs showing the agouti pattern. The whole appearance is that of a dull, faded,
intense brown agouti.

EXTENDED SERIES. 65

Dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti.

Cross 55. Dilute brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-
eyed dilute brown agouti, or pink-eyed dilute brown. Y.Br2D,PpA2 x YoBrodyp2(A2).
Expectation, 1 dBrAg, 1 pdBrAg.

Mating. Parents. | dBr.Ag.| pdBraAg.
510 3439 x pt519... 12 10
642a 7650 x 8023..... 1 2

13 12

Dilute brown agouti x brown.

Cross 56. Dilute brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti crossed with brown
heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Brod,PpA x Y.Br.D.Pp. Expectation, 3 BrAg, 3 Br,
1 pBrAg, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. .| pBrAg. | pBr.

428

2)
o

|
|
13
|

VII. Pinx-Evep Brown Acovti, YBrDpA (Fic. 7).

Eyes clear pink; ears apparently unpigmented, as are also feet and tail. Hairs on ventral
surface indistinguishable superficially from a deep pink-eyed yellow. When examined
more closely they are found to be darker at the base than at the tip, showing the pres-
ence of the agouti pattern. Dorsal hair a very rich brownish yellow and deeper colored
at the base with dull brownish pigment. Because of the reduction of brown pigment
at the tips of the hairs the appearance of banding or “‘ticking”’ is almost entirely wanting.
Whiskers, hairs at base of ears, and around the anus are yellow.

Pink-eyed brown agouti x pink-eyed brown agoutt.

Cross 57. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br:D2p.A x Y2Br.D.p,A. Expectation,
3 pBrAg, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. pBrAg.| pBr.
419 punmarked x p2903.... 6 1
399 3109 x p2903......... 4 1

10 2

Cross 58. Both parents heterozygous in density and agouti. Y2Br,Ddp,A xY2Br.DdppA.
Expectation, 9 pBrAg, 3 pBr, 3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr.

Mating Parents. pBrAg.| pBr. Brag. | pdBr.

400

|
|
|
| |
2004 x 2903 . | 2 2) 1 |

66 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Pink-eyed brown agouti x brown.
Cross 59. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2D2p.A. X Y2Br.D.P2, Expectation, BrAg only.

Mating. | Parents. BrAg.
|

360

p unmarked x 2393... | 1

Cross 60. Homozygous pink-eyed brown agouti crossed with brown heterozygous in dark
eye. Y2Br2Dep.A2 X Y2Br,D2Pp. Expectation, 1 BrAg, 1 pBrAg.

Mating. Parents. BrAg.|pBrAg.

261 p1395 x 1526.......... 9 4

VIII. Pinx-zrep Ditute Brown Acoutt, YBrdpA (Fa. 8).

Eyes pink; ears, tail, and feet very lightly pigmented with brown. In both ventral and
dorsal hairs this form resembles a dull intense pink-eyed brown agouti, differing chiefly
in the comparative lack of bright yellow pigment and in the mealy, washed-out look.
The agouti pattern is very weak indeed.

Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti.

Cross 61. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Brodop,A xY2Brodxp.A. Expectation,
3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. pdBrAg.| pdBr. | p?
479 Unmarked x p4519.. 1 2 i
535 p4213 x p4519....... 1 a 3

2 2 3

Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti x dilute brown.

Cross 614. Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with dilute brown

heterozygous in dark eye. Y.,BridopoA x Y2Brod2Pp. Expectation, 1 dBrAg, 1 dBr,
1 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. dBrAg.| dBr. | pdBrAg.| pdBr.
596 Unmarked x unmarked. . 1 3 1 2
605 7471 X 7468...0020.0..000. 2 4 2 1

3 3 3 3

Cross 618. Both parents homozygous. Y2BrodxpeA2 XY¥2Brod2P2, Expectation, all dBrAg.

Mating.

Parents. | dBrAg.

| 609 | Unmarked x unmarked. 2

EXTENDED SERIES. 67

IX. Buacx, YBrBDP (Fie. 9).

Hairs on ventral surface not so heavily pigmented as the dorsal hairs, and of a dull slaty
black. Tail dark. Dorsal hairs deep, glossy black. Tuft of yellowish hairs at base of
ears. A few yellowish hairs scattered along the flanks, sides and feet. The hairs
around the anus are light yellowish. The feet are dark.

Black x black.

Cross 62. One or both of the parents homozygous. Y.Br.B:D2P2 x Y2Br2B,D.P:. Expec-
tation, all B.

Mating. | Parents. B.

3 401 x 400...) 2
6 200 x 201...] 2

Cross 63. Both parents heterozygous in black. Y2Br,BD2P: x Y:Br.BD2P:. Expecta-
tion, 3B, 1 Br.

Mating. | Parents. | B. | Br.

1 1x 400..) 6 | 2

Cross 64. Both parents heterozygous in density. Y2Br2B,DdP2 x Y2Br,B,DdP:. Expec-
tation, 3 B, 1 dB.

Mating. | Parents. 2.

|
577 [rata x217.., 3 | 3
|

Cross 65. Both parents heterozygousin darkeye. Y2Br2B,D,Pp x Y2Br,B:D,Pp. Expec-
tation, 3 B, 1 pB.

Mating. Parents. B. | pB.
492 Unmarked x 2948......... 3 1
168 455X919... 0. ce eee 12 1
189 450 x 540...........00000- 6 2
114 Unmarked x 454.......... 12 1
131 DAB Ade oo acca Meme eee en 2 1
135 450 x 444..00000.0.0..00000- 7 4
379 Unmarked x unmarked...| 60; 20

102} 30

68 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 66. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye and black. Y.Br,BD,Pp x Y2Br2BD2Pp.
Expectation, 9 B, 3 pB, 3 Br, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. B. | pB. | Br. | pBr.| p?
361 2596 X 2593...........06. 2 1 oe nay llaek
376a | Unmarked x unmarked...| 78 | 26 23 5 1
376b | Unmarked x unmarked...| 13 7 5 2 sax:
247 1706 x 541... ee 2 1 Me 1
318 2031 x 1942.............. 8 2 4 va
316 1948 x 1950.............. 5 4 2 1
267 1948 x 1949-1950......... 3]... 1 is
364 2084 x 2086. ..........26. a ee 2 wa
303 2084-2085 x 2086......... 11 3 3 1
295 2186-87-88-89 x 2184..... 31] 16 6 4
349 2212 X22 tas x5 eee Ahr 7 4 2 a
334 DQVB SC 2218 as secig zcgepe os at 6 5 2 a
358 2210 M2219 ic veeckenaa Ao) Pa 1 1
333 2210-14 x 2219........... 15 2 6 an
444 D2VG C221 vies oe ceiga Sinage 4 2 re 1
336 Unmarked x 2598. . ali St 1 3 3
447 2945 x unmarked......... 1 1 1 2s

199 | 75 61 19 | 1

Cross 664. Both parents heterozygous in black, dark eye, and density, Y2Br,BDdPp.
Expectation, 27 B, 9 dB, 9 pB, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 3 dBr, 3 pdB, 1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. B. | dB. | pB.| Br. | pdB. | pBr. | dBr. | pdBr.
619 7515 x 7513-14-16. .| 4] 2 6 2 1
645 7431 x 7514........ Bee si 2 1
646 7733 X 7734. ....... Bll sna ne ids as

10| 2 6 4 2

Cross 668. Both parents heterozygous in color factor, black, dark eye, and density.
YBr.BDdPp. Expectation, 81 B, 27 dB, 27 pB, 27 Br, 9 pBr, 9 dBr, 9 pdB, 3 pdBr,
64 W.

Mating, Parents. B.|Br.| W.

625 149037208... 5 | 5 | 3

Black x dilute black.
Cross 67. Both parents homozygous, Y2Br2B:D2P: x Y2Br2Brd2P2,_ Expectation, all B.

Mating.| Parents. B.

552 | 4865 x 5789. .| 2

EXTENDED SERIES. 69

Cross 68. Both parents heterozygousin darkeye. Y2Br2B,D:Pp x Y2Br2B.d:Pp. Expec-
tation, 3 B, 1 pB.

Mating.

Parents. | B. : pB.

: hee
197 | 1363 1485. 4].
Black x pink-eyed black.

Cross 69. Both parents homozygous. Y.Br:B,D2P2 x Y2Br.B.D2p2.. Expectation, all B.

Mating. Parents. B.

306 1695 x p1510...| 16

Cross 70. Black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed black.
Y.Br.B.D2P p x Y.Br,B.Dop2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB.

Mating. Parents. B.| pB.
548 Unmarked x p5575..... 13 1
571 3290-96 x p5575........ 6 1
220 1363 x p763............ 7 8

26 | 10

Black x brown.
Cross 71. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.B,D:P2 x Y2Br2D:P:. Expectation, all B.

Mating. Parents. B.

474 Unmarked x 68..} 4

Cross 72. Black heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous brown. Y2Br.BD2P2 x
Y.Br2D,P2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br.

Mating. Parents. B.| Br.
308 1631 x 1950...... 20} 15
383 1931 x 1950...... 7 5
262 1931 x 1949-50...| 10 5
396 2528 x 2122...... 14| 10

51} 35

Cross 73. Black, heterozygous in black, dark eye, and the color factor crossed with pink-
eyed black heterozygous in the color factor and black. YBr,.BD:Pp x YBr,BD2p2.
Expectation, 9 B, 9 pB, 3 Br, 3 pBr, 8 W.

Mating. pB.| Br. | pBr. | W.

Parents. | B.

420 | Unmarked x 3307.. 3

Ter

70 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Black x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 74. Black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown,
Y2Br.B,D.Pp x Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB.

Mating. | Parents. B. | pB.

475 |p unmarked x8... 1 | 4

Cross 75. Black heterozygous in dark eye and black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed
brown. Y2Br.BD:2Pp x Y2Br,D2p.. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB, 1 Br, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. | B. | pB. | Br. | pBr.

493 [suo 7. 2 BG | 1 | 2

Black x pink-eyed dilute brown.
Cross 75a. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.B,D2P2 x Y2Brodzp,. Expectation, all B.

Mating. | Parents. B.
582 7340 X 7341....0........0. 18
589 Unmarked x unmarked...| 4

| 22

Cross 758. Black heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute
brown. Y2Br2B.D:Pp x Y2Brodop,. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB.

Mating. | Parents. | B. | pB.
620. | 7472.x7475...] 5 | 11

X. Ditute Buack, YBrBdP (Fie. 10).

Eyes black; ears, tail, and feet moderately pigmented. Ventral hairs slate-colored. Dorsal
hairs are deep blue slate, somewhat washed-out, and at times resembling a very deep-
colored dilute black agouti. There is a small tuft of light hairs at the base of the ears.
Light yellowish hairs scattered on sides and feet, and around the anus. Unlike the
pink-eyed black form next to be described, one would not hesitate in calling the dilute
black animal, black pigmented.

Dilute black x dilute black.
Cross 76. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br.B:d2P2 x Y2Br2.Bod,P2, Expectation, all dB.

Mating. Parents. dB.

549 Unmarked x 4980...) 15
457 4502-03 x 4497..... 10
442 4502 x 4497........ 5

EXTENDED SERIES. 71

Cross 77. Both parents heterozygous in the color factor, black and dark eye.
YBr.Ba.Pp XYBr,Bd:Pp. Expectation, 27 dB, 9 dBr, 9 pdB, 3 pdBr, 16 W.

Mating. Parents. dB. |\dBr.| pdB. | pdBr. | W.
542 5698 x 5699.............. 2 1 1 1
511 Unmarked x unmarked...| 3 1 33
550 Unmarked x 5699........ 6 2 4 1 2
11 4 5 2 2

Dilute black x pink-eyed black.

Cross 78. Dilute black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed black.
Y.Br2Bod2Pp X Y2BroB,D2p2.. Expectation, 1B, 1 pB.

Mating. Parents. B. | pB.
337 p1049 x 1435....... nf 3
ee Unmarked x 1435..| 2 1

2 4

Cross 79. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with pink-eyed black heterozygous
in density and black. Y.Br,Bd2P2 x Y2Br,BDdp:. Expectation, 3 B,3 dB, 1 Br, 1dBr.

Mating. | Parents. B. | Br. | dB. | dBr.

528 AI RB. 1 2 | 2

Dilute black x brown.

Cross 80. Dilute black heterozygous in black, crossed with homozygous brown.
Y,Br2Bd2P2 X Y2Br.D2P2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br.

Mating. Br.

Parents. | B.

441 | 2563-64-89 x 4495. .

18 |

Cross 81. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with brown heterozygous in density.
Y2Br.Bd,P, x Y2Br.DdP2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br, 1 dB, 1 dBr.

Mating. Parents. B. | Br. | dB. |dBr.
451 4501 x 4857..... 1 sd de bi
437 4501 x 1404..... 3 2 1 2

re: THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Dilute black x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 82. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown.
Y.BroBd2P2 X YoBroDep.. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br.

Mating. | Parents. B. | Br.

557 “Unmarked x 806 sabes 3 | 2

Cross 82a. Homozygous dilute black crossed with pink-eyed brown, heterozygous in
density. YoBroBod2P 2 x Y2Br2,Ddp.. Expectation, 1B, 1dB.

Mating. Parents. B. | dB.
593 Unmarked x —7....... 7 5
612 —8 x unmarked....... 1 3

8 8

Cross 83. Dilute black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with pink-eyed brown heterozy-
gous in density. Y.Br.B.d,.Pp x Y2Br.Ddp,. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB, 1 dB, 1 pdB.

Mating. Parents. 2B pB.| dB. | pdB.

503 4078 x 208. | 2 és 4

XI. Pinx-eyep Buacx, YBrBDp (Fie. 11).
Eyes deep pink; ears very lightly pigmented. Hairs on ventral surface light yellowish-gray.
Tail lightly pigmented. Dorsal hairs varying from a very light yellowish slate color to
a deep lilac. The tufts of light hairs back of the ears are present. No appearance of
black pigment in the dorsal hairs, to the unaided eye. The nose whiskers are light.
almost yellow. The whole appearance resembles somewhat the dark-eyed dilute brown,
The feet are slightly pigmented and the hairs around the anus are light.

Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed black.
Cross 84. Both parents heterozygous in black. Y2Br2BD2p:. x Y2BreaBD2p2. Expectation,

3 pB, 1 pBr.
Mating. Parents. pB. | pBr.
172 p845 x p763...... 2 2
342 pigi2 x 1764...... 6 1
313 1421-1812 x 1764..| 10 6
18 9

Pink-eyed black x brown.

Cross 85. Both parents heterozygous in thecolor factor. YBr2B2Dzp, x YBr,D.P2. Expec-
tation, 3 B, 1 W.

Mating. Parents. B. | W.

356 2178 x 2175..| 4 1

EXTENDED SERIES. 73

Cross 86. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br:B.,Dop2 x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, all B.

Mating. Parents. B.
224 1717 x 1512....... 13
211 1049 x 1630....... 2
230 1042 x 1630....... 4
215 985 x 1630....... 14
234 1638-40 x 1610....) 12
270 1721 x 1609....... 9
296 1765 x 1603....... 3
282 1608 x 1603....... 3
281 845 x 1603....... 6
196 Unmarked x 1603. 7
243 1641 x1194....... 4
236 1520 x 1194....... 9
246 Unmarked x 1194.| 14
205 1524 x 1192....... 12
381 1524 x 2175....... 3

| 115

Cross 87. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous brown.
Y2BroBD.p2 X Y2Br2D2P:,._ Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br.

Mating. Parents. B. | Br.
274 Unmarked x 1764....| 3 3
258 1642 x 1764.......... 2 5
245 572 x 1894.......... 2 1
266 —16 x 1894.......... 2 3
280 1421 xunmarked....| 2 3

1 | 15

Cross 88. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in the color factor and black crossed with brown
heterozygous in color factor. YBr.BD:p2. x YBr,D2,P:. Expectation, 3B, 3 Br, 2 W.

Mating. Parents. | 2 Br. | W.

269 | 1812x1661.......) 1 | 4 | 2

Cross 89. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black crossed with brown heterozygous in dark
eye. Y2Br,BD.p. x Y:Br.2D,Pp. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB, 1 Br, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. B. | pB.| Br. | pBr.

4

257 1714 x 1526....) 2 | 4 | 2

Pink-eyed black x dilute brown.
Cross 894. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B.,D2p2 x Y2Brod2P2. Expectation, all B.

Mating. | Parents. B.

648 | Unmarked x318...) 19

74 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed brown.
Cross 90. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B,D.p. x Y2Br.D.p2. Expectation, all pB,

Mating. Parents. pB.

634 7804 x 7806...) 4

Cross 90a. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black, crossed with homozygous pink-eyed
brown. Y2Br.BDzp. x Y2BriD2p,. Expectation, 1 pB, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. pB. | pBr.

558 5721 x 5806...| 1 2
638 7807 x 7803...) 4 5
640 7809 x 7803...) 4 5

9 12

XII. Pinx-ryvep Diture Buacx, YBrBdp (Fie. 12).

Eyes pink; ears, tail and feet extremely lightly pigmented. Coat clearly washed out in
appearance, and a real bluish lilac, at times almost silvery. This variety is very
characteristic, and is one which, when obtained, is easy to recognize. No one would,
without breeding tests, class this form as possessing black pigment.

Pink-eyed dilute black x brown.

Cross 91. Homozygous pink-eyed dilute black crossed with brown, heterozygous in density.
Y.BroBedop2 X Y2Br,DdP2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 dB.

Mating. | Parents. B. | dB.

449 3627 x 1404..) 11 9
594 19x17....; 1 4

12 13

Pink-eyed dilute black x dilute brown.

Cross 91a. Pink-eyed dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with dilute brown hetero-
zygous in dark eye. Y2Br,Bd2p2 x Y2Brod,Pp. Expectation, 1 dB, 1 dBr, 1 pdB,

1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. dB. | dBr. | pdB. | pdBr.

604 | 7462 x 7461..... 2 3 ait 2

EXTENDED SERIES. 75

XIII. Brown, YBrDP (Fie. 13).

Eyes deep brown; ears and tail brown pigmented. Hairs on the ventral surface are lighter
than those on the dorsal surface, and are dull dirty brown. Dorsal hairs deep, glossy
brown; lighter yellowish hairs occur, as in the black variety, at the base of the ears,
scattered on the flanks, sides, and feet, as well as around the anus. The skin is brown
pigmented.

Brown x brown.

Cross 92. Oneor both parentshomozygous. Y2Br2D2P: x Y2Br2D.P2. Expectation, only Br.

Mating. Parents. Br.

348 Unmarked x 2291. . 5
345 Unmarked x 2386..| 16
525 5942 x 5840........ 5

Cross 93. Both parents heterozygous for the color factor. YBr.D2P2 x YBr,D.P:. Expec-
tation, 3 Br, 1 W.

Mating. Parents. Br. | W.
551 Unmarked x 32...) 4 2
388 2365 x 2374....... 4 2
504 4859 x 4298....... 11 2
575 6225-27 x 6226....) 11 3

30 9

Cross 94. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br,D:.Pp x Y2Br.D,Pp. Expecta-
tion, 3 Br, 1 pBr.

Mating. Parents. Br. | pBr.

406 Unmarked x unmarked...| 9 3
408 Unmarked x unmarked...| 22 7

Cross 95. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye and the color factor. YBr.D.Pp x
YBr,D.Pp. Expectation, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 4 W.

Mating. Parents. Br. | pBr.| W.

408 Unmarked x unmarked.| 22 7 2
366 Unmarked x 2392.......| 15 4 3

37 ll 5

76 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 96. Both parents heterozygous in density and dark eye. Y2Br,.DdPp x Y.Br.DdPp.
Expectation, 9 Br, 3 dBr, 3 pBr, 1 pdBr.

Mating. Parents. Br. | dBr.\ pBr. | pdBr.
|
i
496 Unmarked x unmarked..! 40 16 | 2 | 1
569 Unmarked x 4736....... 3 3 es 4
521 4735 x 4736............- 6 2 1 se
581 Unmarked x unmarked..} 15 8 4 1
632 7597 x 7601-02.......... ll 2 ar oe
635 7439 x 74370-38......... 6 4 1 | 1
81 35 8 | 3

Brown x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 97. Brown heterozygous in density, dark eye and the color factor, crossed with pink-
eyed brown heterozygous in density and the color factor. YBr2DdPp x YBr.Ddp..
Expectation, 9 Br, 9 pBr, 3 dBr, 3 pdBr, 8 W.

Parents. | Br.| dBr.| pBr. |p.

Mating. yw,

538 | arta 3
|

|
- 1 | 3
i

Brown x pink-eyed dilute brown.
Cross 974. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2D2P. x Y2Bredsp2. Expectation, all Br.

Mating. Parents. Br.

583 | Unmarked x unmarked..... 13

Cross 978. Brown heterozygous in density crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute
brown. Y2Br2DdP2 x Y2Brodxp,. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 dBr.

Mating. Parents. Br. | dBr.

584 Unmarked x unmarked....... 3 2

XIV. Ditute Brown, YBrdP (Fic. 14).

Eyes brown; ears, tail and feet, as in the dilute brown agouti, are lightly pigmented with
brown. Ventral hairs pale fawn. Dorsal hairs dull, washed-out brown, at times
resembling a dark, pink-eyed black in general superficial coloration. Ear tufts barely
distinguishable from the rest of the coat. Theskin is moderately pigmented with brown.

Dilute brown x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 98. Both parents homozygous. Y2Brd.P, x Y2Br,D.p.. Expectation, all Br.

Mating. Parents. Br.

495 4446 x -—77..) 18
| 504 4859 x 4298..| 11

24

EXTENDED SERIES. 77

Cross 98a. Dilute brown heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with pink-eyed brown heterozy-
gousindensity. Y2Brid2Pp x Y2Br,Ddp.. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 dBr, 1 pBr, 1 pdBr.

Mating. pdBr.

Parents. | Br. ; dBr. | pBr.

fina
3 | 1 1 | 3

608 | 7479 x 7478...

XV. Pinx-Evep Brown, YBrDp (Fie. 15).

Eyes clear pink. Ears, tail, and feet unpigmented. Hairs on ventral surface dull yellowish
throughout their length. The yellow hairs at the base of the ears and around the anus
are very similar to the rest of the coat, but are, nevertheless, distinguishable from it.
The dorsal hairs are rich fawn colored, lighter than the coat of the pink-eyed brown
agouti.

Pink-eyed brown x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 99. One or both of the parents homozygous. Y2Br,Dop. x Y2Br,Dop2. Expectation,
only pBr.

Mating. Parents. pBr.

391 Unmarked x 3002..| 24
390 Unmarked x 2821..; 10

377 2799 x 3002........ 3
426 3310 x 3309........ 7
524 5805 x 5945........ 11

55

Pink-eyed brown x albino.
(Test matings to determine the gametic constitution of the albinos.)

Cross 100. Pink-eyed brown heterozygous in the color factor crossed with an albino, poten-
tially ahomozygousbrownagouti. YBr2D2p2, x Br,D,P2A2, Expectation, 1 BrAg,1W

BrAg.| W.

6

Mating. Parents.

487 5245 x 4984..) 4

Cross 101. Pink-eyed brown heterozygous in the color factor, crossed with an albino, poten-
tially a homozygous brown. YBrDep2 x Br:D.P:. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 W.

W.| ?

Mating. Parents. | Br.

509 1092 1286... 13 | 2 | 4

XVI. Pinx-evYeEp Ditute Brown, YBrdp (Fie. 16).

Eyes clear pink. Very pale pigmentation throughout hairs and skin, a close approximation
to a dirty brownish cream but still preserving the streaky washed-out appearance
clearly. This form is as characteristic and easily distinguished as the pink-eyed dilute
black. The ear tufts are indistinguishable from the rest of the coat. Pink-eyed dilute
browns crossed inter se have given 120 recorded young, all pink-eyed dilute brown.

It must be remembered that all these descriptions of color varieties are intended to be merely
as they appear to the unaided eye. Many of the regions here spoken of as pink or
unpigmented have, upon microscopic examination, yielded a small amount of pigment.

78 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

RESTRICTED SERIES.

All animals in this series, that is to say, all yellow animals, are of the zygotic formula Rr.
The combination RR, if formed, fails to develop.

(a) Dark-eyed intense series.

This series consists of four types of yellows:

XVII. Buack-Evep YeELLow Carryine Acouti, YBrBDPAR (Fie. 20).
XVIII. Buack-ryep YELLow Wirnout Acouti, YBrBDPR (Fic. 17).
XIX. Brown-Erep YeLLow Carryine Acouti, YBrDPAR.
XX. Brown-EyvepD YELLow Wirsout Acouti, YBrDPR (Fia. 18).

Types XVII and XVII are similar in appearance, and are indistinguishable save by breed-
ing tests. Types XIX and XX also are only to be distinguished from each other by
suitable test matings.

(b) Pink-eyed intense series.

This series consists of four types of yellow which are indistinguishable in external appearance:

XXI. Pinx-zyep YELLow Carryine Buack Acovuti, YBrBDpAR.
XXII. Pinx-evep YeLtow Carryine Brack, YBrBDpR.
XXIII. Pinx-rrep YeLLow Carryine Brown Acovti, YBrDpAR.
XXIV. Pinx-evep YELLOW Carrying Brown, YBrDpR.

Test matings are necessary before these forms can be distinguished from each other.

(c) Dark-eyed dilute series.
In this series also there are four types:

XXV. Buack-zYeD DiruTe YeLLow Carryine Acouti, YBrBdPAR.

XXVI. Buack-erep Dinute YELLow Wirsovutr Acovuti, YBrBdPR.
XXVII. Brown-EYeD Diture YeLLow Carryine Acouti, YBrdPAR.
XXVIII. Brown-zrep Dituts YeELLow Wirsovut Acovuti, YBrdPR (Fia. 19).

In this series types XXV and XXVI are distinguishable from types XXVII and XXVIII
by a careful examination of the eyes. Such a test, however, is not certain enough to
be considered final, and a breeding test forms the only sure basis for a permanent

classification.
(d) Pink-eyed dilute series.

As in the pink-eyed intense series the four forms of this series are indistinguishable save by
breeding tests. This is because of the fact that the total amount of pigment in the
eye is so small that it is impossible to determine whether it is brown or black by any-
thing short of a microscopic examination. The gametic formule follow:

XXIX. Pinz-rvep Diture YELLow Carryine Biackx Acouti, YBrBdpAR.
XXX. Pinkx-rrep Ditute Ye~Low Carryine Buack, YBrBdpR.

XXXI. Pins-syep Ditute YeLtLtow Carrying Brown Acovuti, YBrdpAR.

XXXII. Pins-ryep Ditutre YELLow Carryine Brown, YBrdpR.

Each of these series may now be considered separately.

Up to a certain point there were no pink-eyed or dilute mice, yellow or non-yellow in my
stock. All the yellows were therefore intense dark-eyed yellows and would group them-
selves under one of the first four types (XVII, XVIII, XIX, or XX). Totestthema
cross with any type of brown animal lacking the agouti factor would suffice.

A list of such crosses follows. Yellows which proved to be of type XVII are included in the
following table:

RESTRICTED SERIES.

79

: Zygotic formula
Mating Parents. Y. | BAg. of yellow parent.
29 700-702 br. x 508 yel aly 2 5 Y.Br.B.D2P2AR.
34 707 br. x 502.4A yel.. ‘ 6 4 Y.BroB2D2P2AoR.
36 502.2A yel. x |) a ni 3 Y.BroBeDoP2AiR.

9 10

All these yellows seem to have been homozygous in the factors for black and for agouti.
Yellows of type XIX follow:

. Zygotic formula
Mating. Parents. Y.| BrAg.| Br. of yellow parent:
15-111-85 | 146 yel. x brown. .| 12 8 1 | Y.BroD.P.AR.
18-19 br. x 571 yel di oS 1 5 as Y.BroD2P2A2R.
56 br. x 148 yel Sege aoe 2 1 ie YoBr2D2P2AoR.
82 502.1B yel.xbr...| 2 3 2 | YoBr2DoP2,AR.
17) 17 3

There are two types of zygotes here, those homozygous in the agouti pattern (A) and those
heterozygous, the latter giving non-agouti, as well as agouti young.

The yellows of type XVIII are also of two sorts, those homozygous in the factor for the
production of black (B) and those heterozygous in this factor. Thus in the following
table 502.21A yellow is known to be an animal homozygous in the factor B, while all
the other yellow animals are heterozygous, producing browns as well as blacks.

Type XX,

; . | Sygotic formula
Mating. Parents. Y.| B. | Br. of yellow parent.
63 502.21A yel. xbr.... 1 1 | Y2BroBeD2P oR.
11 br. x 505 yel Sitcien embed 1 2 Y.BroBD2P2R.
37 502.22A yel. xbr.... 2 1 | Y2Bro.BD2P2R.
92 br. x 228 yel........ 2 1 | Y2BroBD2P2R.
100 326 yel. x Brie ens ears 1 1 Y.Br2BDoP.R.
320 2320 yel. > Drs Sess 2 1 Y.BroBD.P.R.
10; 9 6

Yellow x brown.

yellows which give browns only, are seen in the following table:

: Zygotic formula
Mating. Parents. Y.. |) Br: of yellow parent.
62 502.23A yel.xbr....} 2 1 Y2BroD2P oR.
232 br. x 13816 yel Bie Geerltinge 1 i Y.Br.D.P.R.
293 br. x 988 yel........ 3 2 Y.Br2D2P2R.
329 2319 yel. xbr....... 3 4 Y.BroD2P oR.
331 2109-2110 yel. xbr..| 1 a Y.BroDoP2R.
304-314 | 2109 yel. xbr....... 13 3 Y.BroD2PoR.
327-222 | br. x160l yel....... 5 4 Y,Br,D.P.R.
141-142 | br. x 580yel........ 11 5 Y.Br2D2P2R.
151-170 | br. x 881-883 yel....| 4 9 Y.Br2DoP.R.

597 yels Dr eaiawers sav 6 4 YoBroD2P oR.

601 vel. ¥Drkcas daca sien 6 3 Y2BroDoP oR.

602 br. x 7488 yel....... 1 6 YoBroDeP oR.
56 48

80 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

It has been shown, then, that yellows of the four dark-eyed intense pigmented types exist.

The pink-eyed yellows (types XXI-XXIV inclusive) have been crossed only inter se or with
black pigmented forms, but it is certain that they also can occur in the four types com-
parable to the dark-eyed intense series.

The dark-eyed dilute yellows have been crossed with brown only in a few cases. Chiefly
they have been bred inter se to determine whether the 2 : 1 ratio holds good in their
case as in the intense forms. Of those tested, one, 97298, is of the zygotic formula
Y,Br,Bd2PpA2k and when crossed with a pink-eyed brown has given 1 yel, 1 pdyel,
1 BAg, 2 BrAg, 1 pBAg. This shows that types XXV and XXVII can exist. The
other animal, also a female, gave by a pink-eyed brown male, 7 yel, 2 pyel, 2 Blk, 2 Br,
3 pB. This animal was of the formula Y2Br.Bd.PpR, and argues strongly in favor of
the existence of types XXVI and XXVIII.

Of the pink-eyed dilute yellows few have been tested, but I have, at present, a race of animals
which give only two sorts of young, viz, pink-eyed dilute yellows and pink-eyed dilute
browns; such pink-eyed dilute yellows are the ultimate recessives of the yellow series
belonging to type XXXII, formula Y.Brd.p.R.

From the few matings given above, together with the larger number of yellow matings which
follow, it is easy to see that yellows may be obtained of the various zygotic compositions
found in the non-yellow varieties, differing from them only by the addition of the restric-
tion factor, R.

We shall first consider the crosses between yellow animals of these four varieties, which form
the intense dark-eyed series.

Yellow x yellow, giving only dark-cyed intense young.
Cross 102, Giving Y and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. | Br.
127 425 X 424. oe ae 4 3
38 §02.23A x 502.5B....) .. 3
39 Unmarked x 505.1A..) 4 3
255 1410 x 1667.......... 5 1
801 1747 x 49-1746....... 4 2
297 1723 1827s ovcadgn%x 2 1
574 7180 x 7181.......... 6 1
166 893 x 895............ 12 7
37 21

Cross 108. Giving Y, Br, and W (and in one case BrAg).

Mating. Parents. Y. |BrAg.| Br. | W.
384 Unmarked x unmarked.| 22 7 6
118 578 x 580...........0.. 1 4 1
145 146 x 895.............. 5 8 7
178 146-894 x 895.......... 3 = ae Sa
185 894 xX 895... 0... ee 1 1 5 2
183 146-893-94 x 895....... 3 2% Ss =
326 V2AT 2818 oo cemwanes 8 Me 1 at
352 726-1247 x 2311........ 3 a 1 i

46 1 26 18

RESTRICTED

Cross 104. Giving Y, BAg, B, and W.

SERIES.

Mating. Parents. Y. |BAg.| B.| W.

8 502.1A x 502.5A....) 3 ace: Sh deaf

9 502.2A x 502.5A....) 10 2 1 3

10 502 x 511. ...-...... 7 ae hea tI

15 509 x 511.......... 2 2 1

248 1247 x 1316........, 5 $5 3

570 Unmarked x 3297..| 2 1

29 4 1 | 18

Cross 105. Miscellaneous yellows giving Y, BAg, and B.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg.| B. | BAg or B.
529 Unmarked x 1938.) 38 1 11 4
283 1723 x unmarked..} .. 63 1 %
264 1666 x 1667....... 1 oe ex

27 509.1A x 511...... 3 1
14 509 x 510......... 3 1
7 502 x 503... ....... 5 &
22 514.6A x 505.1A... 1
28 514.44 x 505.1A...) 4
55 3 12 4

Sooty yellow x sooty yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young.

Cross 106. Giving Y, sY, B, and BAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | sY. | BAg.| B. | Bor BAg.
440 3196 x 3777......... 3 1 2 bss
471 Unmarked x 3957... 1 8 3 <a ais
502 Unmarked x 3777...| 15 13 4 10 1
19 22 7 12 1

Cream x cream, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young.

Cross 107. Giving cream, or light yellow, B and Br.

Mating. Parents. Cream Y.| B. | Br.
284 1248 x 1414..... 4 8 ou
445 3907 x 875...... 2 1 2
122 648 x 647....... ne 2 a
285 1750 x 1745-46... 2 Pe 2

8 3 4

81

82 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 108. Giving cream, BAg, B, Br, and W.

Mating. Parents. Cream Y.| BAg. | B. | Br.
397 3908 x 875......... 4 2 2 2A 1
469 4068 x 4796........ 1 1 real ee 1
325 2050 x 875......... 7 a 2 4 1
188 1248 x 580......... des re 1 1
418 Unmarked x 875... 3 2 2 1
15 3 6 7 5

Yellow x cream, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young.
Cross 109. Giving Y, B, BrAg, and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. B. | BrAg.| Br.

450 Unmarked x 3906. ..| 36 10 3
233 882 x 601.........-. 1 24 i

et Or

37 10 3 6

Cross 110. Giving Y, B, BrAg, Br ?, and W.

Mating.| Parents. Y. | B. | BrAg.|B or Br.| W.

273 2049 x 875...) 5 “i 1 1 a
272 2048 x 875...) 4 1 Ae 22 4
9 1 1 1 4

Cross 111. Giving Y, cream, B, Br, and W.

Mating.| Parents. Y. |Cream Y.| B. | Br. | W.

146 284 x 875...) 1 5 2 -

123 284 x 647...) .. 5 1 3

154 882 x 881...; 10 2 1 8 3
11 12 4 11 3

Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 112. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, Br, dY, dBAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. |dY.| BAg. |\dBAg.| BrAg.
164 620 x 621..... 2 ‘sds 2 1 1
250 1658 x 1660....} 10 3 : =

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Cross 113. Giving Y, BAg, dBAg, and WV.

Mating. | Parents.

Y. | BAg. | aBAg. W.

23 | 580 x Bits

ae ae

5

Yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed young.
Cross 114. Giving Y, pY, B, pB, Br, and pBr.

83

Mating. | Parents. Y. | pYy.| B. | Br. | pB.| pBr.
321 2198 x 2197.............. Cian ee 5 | 2 2 ne
311 1947 x 1877.............. 4 | 2 6]... 2 1
393 Unmarked x unmarked..| 3 | 2 1 ae ae

14 4 12 2 4 1

Cross 1144. Giving Y, sY, pY, BAg, B, BrAg, Br, pBAg, pB, pBr, and p?.

Mating Parents. Y.|sY.|pY.|BAg.| B.| BrAg.| Br. |pBAg.| pB. | pBr. | p?
477 Unmarked x 5228..| 45 | 3 2 ve | UL és 6 1 na 1 re
459 Unmarked x4631..| 7 | 1 2 ll |. 4 wn _ oe aa pe
256 1722 x 1827........ 7/ 1 2 3 2 re 1 is e
244 1724 x 1827........ 4/1 5 1 235 2. es
287 1722-24 x 1827..... 4]... 2 2 2 3 1

67; 6 | 138 | 11 | 16 4 9 1 3 1 1
Cross 115. Giving Y, pY, BAg, BrAg, B, Br, pB, and W.
Mating. Parents. Y. | pY.| BAg. | BrAg.| B. | Br. | pB.| W.
430 3299 x 3297....) 5 1 ee eh ee 1 3
159 786 x 784..... 4 1 1 2 1 1
9 2 1 2 4 1 1 4
Sooty yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed young.
Cross 116.

Mating. Parents. Y. | SY. |pY.| BAg.| BrAg.| B. | Br.|pBAg.| pB. | pBr.
251 1826 x 1829............. Qi ase Wi | tases ee 1/1 is i a
240 | 1828 x 1829............. 5 1 Bel <a be 1! 1 1 2 Ms
278 =| 1826-28 x 1829.......... 3 ks 3] as ae ss Ieee ia 1 is
828 | 2666-67 x 1829.......... 6 15 Woe | sane ae 2] 3 Fee a Sa
362 | 2666 x 1829............. 1 De tees P| ante Ms 1; 1 a 1 3
367 Unmarked x 1829....... 88; 10 |} 138) .. ae 18} 5 se 6 1
339 | 2668 x 1829............. Gil) ake il was ll Jes fe at fo re ne ci
353 | : 2667 x 1829............. Wy! sa fee ae 20 1} 1 oe
354 | 2665 x 1829............. 5 Dy lage |: Faye oe 3] 2 ih
460 | Unmarked xunmarked.| 4; .. | ..] .. i BE 1
415 | Unmarked x 3460......., 10 3 Pel) oe de al Naas ig
411 | Unmarked x 3640....... 3 Vo Togs ||) ay a eee
485 | Unmarked x 3777....... 4 4 1 o 3 hae
472 | Unmarked x 3957....... 24 9 14 6 2/ 2

112) 32 | 22] 15 6 34 | 17 2 10 1

84

THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.

Cross 117.
Mating. Parents. | Y; oY. Bao |aBdg i pBAg. pdBAg.| pdB. pdBr \W.
ea
446 | Unmarked x06. 6 2 2 | 2 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1
Yellow x yellow, miscellaneous.
Cross 118. No color varieties recorded.
Mating. Parents. Y. |non Y.| W.
556 Unmarked x 4334........ 4 2 ng
555 Unmarked x 4528........ 9 3 4
579 Unmarked x 4631........ 11 9 3
544 Unmarked x 4712........ 5 ae Ay
568 Unmarked x 4891........ 5 2 ee
543 Unmarked x 4905........ 2 4 hg
565 Unmarked x 4149........ 3 ss hs
572 Unmarked x unmarked..| 77 38 2
116 58 2
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving nothing but intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 119. Giving Y, BAg ?, B, BrAg, and Br.
Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg or B.| B. | BrAg.| Br.
546 Unmarked x 5155..... 14 1 2 -
564 Unmarked x 4710..... 2 4 3
520 Unmarked x 4834..... 1 -
17 1 2 3
Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 120. Giving Y, dY, dBAg, BrAg, and dBrAg.
Mating. Parents. Y. | dY. |dBAg.| BrAg.|dBrAg.
567 Unmarked x 4146..... 2 1
566 Unmarked x 4712..... 6 a a ee 1
553 Unmarked x 4905..... 2 6 1 1 1
10 6 1 1 3

Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 121. Giving Y, pY, BAg, BrAg, B, and W.

Mating.

Parents.

BAg. Bras. B.

476

Unmarked x 4710...

|

SEICvE

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Yellow x dilute ycllow, giving intense and dilute dark-eycd and pink-eyed young.
Cross 122. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, BAg, dBrAg, dB, or dBAg.

85

|
Mating. Parents. Y. | dY. | pY. | pdY.|BAg.| dBrAg.|dB or dBAg.
563 Unmarked x 4631....) 1 1 ay 1 1 sh
533 Unmarked x 5008....} 11 5 1 a 1 = 2,
12 6 1 1 1 1 2
Yellow x dilute sooty yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 123. Giving Y, sY, dY, dsY, BAg, BrAg, dBAg, and dBrAg.

Mating. Parenis. Y. | sY.JdY. dsY.) BAg.| BrAg.|BAg or BrAg. | dBAg.|dBrAg.
463 Unmarked x 4346.) 9 | 2/1) 8 6 4 3 1 1
514 Unmarked x 2348. 5 | 1) 5) 4 2 1 se 1 Ae

wi aiel? | @ 5 3 2 1
|
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 124. Giving Y and BAg.
Mating. Parents. Y. |BAg.
554 Unmarked x 4149....} 3 aii
99 22 SATB is discgreiece aa 4 1
7 1
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 125. Giving Y, B, and dB.
Mating. Parents. | Y. | B. | dB.
125 | 326 x 563..... | 4 1 2
Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense pink-eyed and dark-eyed young.
Cross 126. Giving Y, pY, B or BAg, B, Br, pBrAg, and pB.
Mating. Parents. Y. | pY.| BAg or B.| B. | Br. |pBrAg.| pB.| p?
200 1282 x 1889............ 1 1 2 2 ee Wal
216 1288 x 1889. .....2-..06- 1 2 ne 3 ee ee
514 Unmarked x 4523...... 2 2 1 3
473 Unmarked x unmarked.) 2 is 1 1 “s
6 5 2 4 1 1 3/1

86 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 127. Giving Y, pY, BAg, B, Br, pB, and W.

Mating. Parents. Y. | pY.|BAg.| B. | Br. | pB.| W.

501 (a) unmarked x 3297...| 1 5 ae a a
532 (b) unmarked x 3297...!| 4 2 1 1 1 1 2
5

Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 128. Giving Y, pY, dBAg, and pdBAg.

Mating. Parents. | Y. oY. abo pdBAg.

530 Unmarked x 462. 1 | 2 | 1 1

Cream x pink-eyed yellow, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young.
Cross 129. Giving Y and BAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg.

184 1223 x 1074..| 3 ba
210 1223 x 1064..] 14 1

17 1

In the following crosses, between yellow and non-yellow animals, equality of yellow and
non-yellow young is to be expected. These matings, like the yellow x yellow matings
just cited are planned chiefly to test the relation of yellow to non-yellow forms, not
with an eye to producing any certain color variety.

Yellow x black agouti, giving only dark-eyed intense young.
Cross 130. Giving Y and BAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg.
12 506 x 530.5A..... 3 4
24 530.1A x 630..... 1 7
4 11

Cross 131. Giving Y, BAg, and W.

Mating. Parents. |. BAg.| W.

16 608570... 2 1 | 1

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Cross 132. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, and W.

Mating.

Parents. ke BAg. Bro W.

95 | 622 x 624...

ART ia

Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.

Cross 133. Giving Y, BAg, and dBAg.

Mating. Parents. |v BAg. | dBAg.

Yellow x black agoutt, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.

Cross 134. Giving Y, dY, pY, BAg, dBAg, BrAg, dBrAg, B, pB, and Br.

87

Mating. Parents. Y.|dY.|pY.| pdY.| BAg.|dBAg.| BrAg.|dBrAg.| B. | pB. | Br.
489 | Unmarked x 3114....) 11} 1 | 2 ots 4 3 2 1 77m Yee ea
3875 Unmarked x 3114-15.| 24] 8 | .. se 10 5 8 1 i Ga eer fe

385] 9 | 2 aac 14 8 10 2 3 1 3

Cream x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young only.

Cross 135. Giving cream and BAg.*

Mating. Parents. Cream Y.| BAg.
443 Unmarked x unmarked.... 1 1
434 2108-09 x 3947............. 2 1

3 2

*The black agoutis used in this cross were wild.

Cross 136. Giving Y, BAg, and B.

Cross 187. Giving Y, BAg, and BrAg.

Mating. Parent. | Y. | BAg.

265 917 x 1550...... | 3 | 2 | 1

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg. Bra

534 4798 x 4796... 2 1 | 1

88 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 138. Giving Y, BAg, and BrAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg. | BrAg.
322 D154 SEB ysis, Sessa cas 4 2 2
412 Unmarked x unmarked...| 2 5 2s

6 2 2

Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 139. Giving Y, dY, BAg, dBAg, B, dB, BrAg, and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. |dY.|BAg.|dBAg.| B. BrAg.
438 4435 x 2829.............. 4 1 £4
432 4434-35 x 2829... 2.02.2... 4 1 ne a a a hag I
409 Unmarked x 2829........ 10 8 3 a6 1 3 3 1
421 2352 2859. iss ees haere ss 2 es a 1 eh ae 1 i
20; 10| 3 i 1 ni 3 | 4

Cream x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 140. Giving Y, dY, dsY, and Br.

Mating.| Parents. | ¥ dY = Br.

y. | ay
|
373 | 2348 x 2829. | 4 pile? 1

Cross 141. Giving Y, BAg, dBrAg, and W.

Mating. Parents. | Y. Bab.

402 2258» 188... 4 | 3 | 1 | 3

Sooty yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 142. Giving Y, sY, pY, BAg, and pBAg.

Mating. | Parents.

|
|

Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 148. Giving Y, BAg, and B.

i
sY. pr BAg. (Bor Bag. Aa
\
|

2411 x 2600 Soest 5 nf 7 a | u 6 2

Mating. | Parents. Y. |BAg.| B.
76 509.2B x 409...] .. 9 6
78 227 x 412....... 9 8 5

RESTRICTED SERIES. 89

Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 144. Giving Y, BAg, dBAg, and BrAg.

Mating. Parents. | Y. | BAg. “Ao

330 1607 x 1876... 7 2 | 1 | 3

Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 145. Giving Y, BAg, dBAg, pBAg, B, and pB.

Mating. Parents. | Y. | BAg. pBAg.| aby. B. PB.

371 3506 x 238 eee | 8 1 | 1 | 1 2 | 1

Cross 146. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, B, dB, and W.

Mating. | Parents. | Y.

pY.|dY. may B. ap. W.

433 [4051 x unmarked... 5 | 4 1 1 | 2 | 2 4

Yellow x black, giving only dark-eyed intense young.
Cross 147. Giving Y and BAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg.
54 502 X177............ 5 2
49 ISD KiSTOiesoue coheed 4 3
90 Unmarked x 502.5B..} 2 5
61 502.3B xunmarked..| 3 2
14 12

Cross 148. Giving only Y and B.

Mating. Parents. Y. B.
370 1977 x 2046.......... 3 2
52 502.22B x 182........ 2 3
53 509 x 182..........4- 2 4
88 Unmarked x 321..... or 2
137 224 x 347......2...6- 4 1
40 Unmarked x 505.1A..} .. 2
ll 14

90 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 149. Giving Y, BAg, and B.

Mating. Parents. Y. |BAg.| B.
35 207 x 502.6B......; 3 2 2
103 225 X 847.......... 2 1 5

5 3 7

Cross 150. Giving Y, B, and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. B. | Br.
117 328 X 328.......... 2 5 1
292 1662 x 1660........ 7 3 1
238 1662-63 x 1660..... 7 3 1

16 ll 3

Cross 151. Giving Y, BAg, and W.

Mating. Parents. Y. |BAg.| W.
46 178 x 530.01B..... 3 1 1

47 509.3B x177...... 3 1 3

17 206 x 510.......... 2 3 2

42 201.1A x 511...... 2 1 3
43 201.2A x 511...... 1 1 3

11 7 12

Cross 152. Giving Y, B, and W.

Mating. Parents. Ys B. WwW.
59 Unmarked x 141...) 4 1 1

21 206 x 514.......... 3 2 3

72 178 x 820.......... 6 8 3

58 168-170-171 x 185..| 3 1 2

51 206 x 172.......... 1 2 2

17 14 11

Mating. Parents. Y. | Cream Y.| BAg. | BrAg.
73 —67 xunmarked...| 5 ius 5 1
71 284 x 182......... 15 1 oe -
108 Unmarked x 323..| 7 er 1 1
357 1978 x 2406....... 3 ie 1
91 328 x 502.5B...... 5 3 2
35 1 9 5

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Cross 154. Giving Y, cream, BAg?, B, Br, and W.

91

Mating. Parents. Y. |Cream Y.|BAgor B.| B. | Br.| W.
57 152x1.1A....| 4 a of 3 1 1
80 185 x 319..... 4 ee 2 5 1 1
94 185 x 348..... 9 3 1 9 2 10
17 3 1 17 4 12
Cross 155. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, B, and W.
Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg. | BAg or B.| B. | BrAg.| W.
41 206 x 510.2A......... 6 5 5 4 a4 2
55 184 x 148a........... 6 1 ac os 2 2
70 Unmarked x 319..... 2 2 ts 1 1 5
133 325 x unmarked...... 6 Pe 5 a 2 5
66 502.2B x unmarked...|_ .. 1 3 2
20 8 ll 5 8 16
Yellow x black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 156. Giving Y, B, Br, and dB.
Mating. | Parents. Ye) B: | Br. | dB.
276 | 1663 x 1660... 2 ae
Yellow x black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 157. Giving Y, pY, B, and pB.
Mating. Parents. Y. | pY. | B. | pB.
341 2195 x 2197......... 2 oa: 3 1
491 Unmarked x 2948...) 5 1 6 1
456 2803 x 2948......... 3 1 2 1
10 2 11 3
Cross 158. Giving Y, cream, pY, B, Br, pB, and pBr.

Mating. Parents. Y. | Cream Y.|; pY.| B. | Br. | pB. | pBr. | p?
424 2803 x unmarked..... 3 a ae 9 1 1 Bed ltrate
319 1941 x 1942.......... 6 ba 3 9 5 2 1 as
290 1882 x 1877..... ee 2 i 1 4 1 2 em.) |e
121 549 x 540-41-42-44...| 14 a3 a 6 5 3 3 2
214 549 x 541............ 14 1 3 13 2 6 1 om

39 1 7 41 14 14 5 2

92 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cream x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 159. Giving Y, B, and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. | B. | Br.
217 Unmarked x 988....| 3 1 1
288 2092 x 989.......... 3 2 2
6 3 3
Cross 160. Giving Y, B, Br, and W.
Mating.| Parents. | Y. | B. | Br. | W.
156 328 x 988. . 1 3 | 10 7

; Cream x dilute black, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 161. Giving Y and ?

Mating. | Parents. a ie

312 | 1751 x 1435..... 2

Yellow x dilule black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 162. Giving Y, dY, dB, and dBr.

Mating. Parents. | Y. | dy. | dB. be

448 4499 x 4496...) 1

ae

Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only dark-eyed intense young.
Cross 163. Giving Y and B.

Mating. Parents. | ¥ B.

271 1639 x 1587...) 2 1
289 1666 x 1610...) 5 7
307 2049 x 1610...) 1 5

8 13

Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 164. Giving Y, Br, and pB.

Mating.

Parents. Y. Be pB.

309 | 2030x206 eeene ead 4 | 1 1

Cream x pink-eyed black, giving only dark-eyed intense young.

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Cross 165. Giving Y, cream, and B.

Mating. Parents. Y. |Cream Y.! B.
299 1105 x 1414.....0......... 2 3
180 1256 x 1192..............- 10 = 15
204 LTO5 6 989. canis aac eelehig 1 3 5
225 1193 989 excise saad ees 7 as 4
Bi Unmarked xunmarked...| 8 2 10

28 5 37

Cross 166. Giving Y, sY, B, and Br.

Mating. Parents. | Yu) ¥en) Be Bri
208 | 1411 x 1394... | 4 | 1 a 2
Cross 166a. Giving Y, cream, Br, and W.
Mating. Parents. | Y. | Cream Y. | Br. | W.
226 1105 x 580. 2 2 i | 2 2

Yellow x brown agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 167. Giving Y and BAg.

|
Mating. Parents. | BAg.

30 511.2B x 502.4A. | 4

Cross 168. Giving Y and BrAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BrAg.
32 575 x 502.5A....... er 1
110 427 x 424.......... 3 5
461 4340 x unmarked...| 2 4
5 10

Cross 169. Giving Y, BAg, and B.

Mating. Parents. | Y. Ba

50

SILIAX U0... 5 1 | 2

93

94 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Cross 170. Giving Y, BrAg, and Br.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BrAg.| Br.

191 892 x 895....... 2 3 1

Cross 171. Giving Y, BrAg, and W.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BrAg.| W.

75 170 x 410....... 1 5 2

Cross 172. Giving Y, BrAg, Br, and W.

Mating. Parents. | Y. Bras, Br. | W.

176 501 805 sees | 7 2 ls 6
|

Yellow x brown agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 173. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, and dBrAg.

Mating. Parents. | Y. | BAg. | BrAg. | dBrAg.
69 IML x1... i 5 | 5 | 1
Cross 174. Giving Y, dY, and dBrAg.
Mating. Parents. XY; | dy. Brg
423 3414 x 3413....) 1 | 2 | 4

In the following matings the yellow parents were dilute, and of four different sorts, viz:

Dilute black-eyed yellow, Y2Br2Brd,P2A2R;
Dilute black-eyed yellow, Y2Br2Bod.P2R;
Dilute brown-eyed yellow, Y2Br2d,P2.A2R;
Dilute brown-eyed yellow, Y2Brod2P.R.

These four varieties are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to tell from one another by
superficial examination. The two brown-eyed types may, however, be distinguished at
times by their eye-color, which is, as in the corresponding intense types, always brown.
The following description will apply then to these four varieties:

Eyes black or brown, ears pink. Ventral hairs much the same as in the intense yellow type.
Tail unpigmented. Dorsal hairs a dull heavy yellow with the characteristic washed-out
appearance of all dilute forms. Hairs at the base of the ears and around the anus are
indistinguishable from the rest of the coat.

RESTRICTED SERIES.

Dilute yellow x dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 175. Giving dY and dBAg.

Mating. Parents. | dy. “Bag.
499 | Unmarked x 3875... ; 9 | 2
Cross 176. Giving dY and dB.
Mating. | Parents. | dY, | dB
oe | |
547 Unmarked x 5155...... | 6 | 2
Cross 177. Giving dY, dBAg, and dBrAg.
Mating. Parents. dY. | dBAg. | dBrAg.
382 3401 x 2233........ 9 2 3
481 Unmarked x 4456..) 15 8 4
482 Unmarked x 4712..) 25 2 9
49 12 16
Cross 178. Giving dY, dBAg, dBrAg, and dBr.
Mating. Parents. dY. |dBAg. | dBrAg.\dBr.
484 | Unmarked x 4334....| 8 1 | 3 3
Cross 179. Giving dY, dBrAg, and W.
Mating. | Parents. dY. |dBrAg. | W.
483 | 4147 x 4146....) 4 2 | 3

Cross 180. Giving dY, dBAg, dBrAg, and W.

Mating. W.

Parents. i dBAg.| dBrAg.

531 Unmarked x 4146..... 4

Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 181. Giving dY, BAg, B, dBAg, and dBrAg.

Mating. | Parents. dBrAg.

| B. | dBAg.
1

|

500

aY. | BAg.
| 1

Unmarked x 4152. 2

1 | 1

95

96 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 182. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, BAg, dBAg, B, and pB.

Mating. Parents. Y.| pY.| dY.| pdY.| BAg. dBAg.| B. | pB. | BAg or B.

He | Uamerked cats. |). | 2 | | @ 1
480 Unmarked x 3875.| 1 2 f as 2. ay 2
467 | 4524 x 4523....... oat Beng an eee
539 Unmarked x 4523.) .. 3 | 1 Es 2
5 | 8 | | & | 2 i lel 4 2

Dilute yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 183. Giving dY, dBAg, and dB.

Mating.

Parents. | dY. eae. dB.

512 | Uomarked 3876... 15 | 8 [2

Dilute yellow x wild black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 184. Giving Y and ?

Mating.

Parents. | ¥.

|

523 1815 5100-5161... 1

Dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 185. Giving dY, dsY, and dBAg.

Mating. Parents. dY. | dsY. |\dBAg.
439 3553 x 3876....... 7 = 5
417 3554 x 3875........ 5 1 3

12 1 8

Dilute yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving only dilute dark-eyed young.
Cross 186. Giving dY, dBAg, and dBrAg.

Mating. Parents. dY. | dBAg. |dBrAg.
450 4023-24 x 4021-22....) 1 5 5
427 4024 x 4021-22....... 8 is 5
431 4023 x 4021-22....... 6 4 1
343 2259 x 2233.......... 6 4 3

21. 13 14

RESTRICTED SERIES. 97

Dilute sooty yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 187. Giving dsY, pdY, dBAg, and dBrAg.

Mating. Parents. dsY.| pdY. |\dBAg.| dBrAg.
490 4803 x 4573......... 3 1 1 I
465 Unmarked x 4753...| 2 1 2s oe

5 2 1 1

In the following crosses, the yellow parents were pink-eyed, and of four different types, viz.:
Pink-eyed yellow, Y2Br.B,D2p.A2R;
Pink-eyed yellow, Y2Br2.B.,D.p.R;
Pink-eyed yellow, Y2Br.Dyp.A.R;
Pink-eyed yellow, Y2Br.DopR.

The eyes of the two varieties last named contain only a small number of granules, all of
which are brown. They are indistinguishable from the eyes of the first two varieties,
which, however, contain black granules. The following description will serve for all
four varieties:

Eyes clear deep pink. Ears pink and unpigmented. In every other way these pink-eyed
types resemble closely the dark-eyed yellow types. They occur in all grades from a
deep orange to light cream, as do the dark-eyed forms. Because of the reduction of
black and brown granules sooty pink-eyed yellows are seldom if ever obtained.

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense pink-eyed young.
Cross 188. Giving pY, pBAg, and pB.

Mating. Parents. pY. |pBAg.| pB. | p?

155 1066 x 1064..| 3 3

195 801 x 1064..) 2 5 sii 1

160 1067 x 1064..} 2 sis

173 1074 x 563...) 2 1 2 2

113 562 x 563...) 6 3 2 1
15 9 4 4

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-eyed young.
Cross 189. Giving pY, pdY, and pdB.

Mating. Parents. ie pay. | pdB.

468 [Unmarked 4529 clue | 1 1 | 1

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-eyed young.
Cross 190. Giving pY, pdY, pB, and pdB.

Matin. Parents. DY. pdY. | pB. | pdB. |pB orn pe

351 [in x 228... " 1 | 4 2 3 | 2

98 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Pink-eyed yellow x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 191. Giving Y, pY, BAg, and B.

Mating.| Parents. | Y. | pY.|BAg.| B. Darkeeyed.

126 | 414x563.) 8 | 1 | 5 S| 2

Pink-eyed yellow x dilute black, giving inlense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 1914. Giving Y, pY, B, dB or dBAg, pdBAg.

Mating. Parents. | Y. | py. pdBAg.| p?

B. | dB or dBAg.

254 085 x 38 ig 03 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 1

Pink-eyed yellow x brown, giving intense dark-eyed young.
Cross 192, Giving Y and BAg.

Mating. Parents. Y. | BAg.

201 1489 x 1487...| 5 | 3

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only pink-eyed intense young.
Cross 193. Giving pY and pBAg.

Mating. Parents. pY. |pBAg.| p?
79 413 x 412........ 16 14 ists
167 1062 x 1065....... ee 4 its
157 1060 x 1065....... 3 4 3
19 22 3

Cross 194. Giving pY, pBAg, and pB.

Mating. Parents. pY. |pBAg. | pB.

102 587 x 568......... 23 8 | 2

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed brown agouti, giving only pink-eyed intense young.
Cross 195. Giving pY and pBAg.

Mating. Parents.

pY. pBAo

194 1895 1... 3 | 2

:

Ik,

RESTRICTED SERIES. 99

Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only intense pink-eyed young.
Cross 196. Giving pBAg and pY?

Mating. Parents. | pBAg.

237 684 x 763..... | 3

In the following crosses the yellow parents would fall into one of the four following classes:

Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y2Br.Bodop,A2h;
Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y2Br.B.dop.R;
Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y.Br.dop,A.R;
Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y2Brodop.R.

These four types, as in the intense pink-eyed forms, are indistinguishable from one
another by superficial examination.

Eyes pink, otherwise indistinguishable from the dark-eyed dilute yellows already described.
No case of a pink-eyed dilute sooty yellow has been recorded in these experiments,

Pink-eyed dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and dilute pink-eyed young.
Cross 197. Giving dY, pdY, dBAg, pdBAg, dB, pdB, dBrAg, and dBr.

Mating. Parents. dY. | pdY. | dBAg. | pdBAg.|dB.| pdB. | dBrAg. |\dBr.| pd?
435 Unmarked x 2488.| 3 5 2 1 1 4 23 1
425 8493 x 2488....... 1 3 1 1 ae 1
436 3490 x 2488....... 4 4 1 3 3 be 1
8 12 4 5 1 7 1 1 1

Pink-eyed dilute yellow x black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young.
Cross 198. Giving Y, pY, pdY, B, pB, and dB.

Mating.

Parents. | Y. ey. pay. B. pp. dB. | p?

389 | 245 x 2318 Lele | 4 | 5 1 | 4 | 3 2 1

We may now consider‘a few tests of albinos which have been made. All of these seem to
show that albinos may be potentially any of the 32 color varieties already mentioned
or any of their heterozygous combinations. None of the following albinos were tested
for dilution and therefore they are treated as intense in their formule, though if the
proper test, was made they might not turn out so.

100 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Albino x pink-eyed brown.

Cross 199.

Mating. Parents. Y.| B.| BrAg.| Br. | pB. | pBrAg.| pBr. see cate if
517 Unmarked x unmarked. 8 ae Re .. | BroDePo.
536 4871 07. coc cc eee ees 7 i Hs .. | BreDoPo.
458 Unmarked x 440....... 6 “3 ae .. | BroDoPo.
540 4873 X —07... 266s 4 1 3 i .. | BrBD2P».
466 4870-73 x —07.......... 3 9 Si - .. | BroBD2Po.
518 4870 x unmarked....... 4 3 ee 7 we Br.,BD2P3.
498 4870 x —07............. 3 1 ce ee .. | BroBDoPo.
470 AQ(2) BIG 2. o's cea ae shavacs 6 3 ey 3 | BreDoPp.
516 4285-72 x 5162......... alee 5 a6 2 6 | BroDePpA.
497 4872 x —07............. ca | 2. 1 2 A 2 | BroaBD2Pp.
478 4273 x 51638............ ae ae ar ee 8 7 BroDoprA.
508 4285 x 5162............ 3 3 | BreDopA.
505 4271 x 5168............ se |fisier ee £6 wae ie 38 .. | BreDepeAs.
429 4408 x 3746............ Dt seg 8 2 be ae .. | BroD2PoR.
578 Unmarked x unmarked.} 2 | 1 1 2 ey ee .. | BroBD2P2AR.
A small number of more accurate tests of albinos follow:

Albinos x pink-eyed dilute brown.
Cross 200.
Mating. Parents. dBr.
614 Unmarked x 7551 albino...... 4
626 Unmarked x 7868 albino..... 18
22

Both 7551 and 7868 albinos turned out potentially homozygous dilute brown animals.
Two crosses between homozygous dilute brown animals carrying albinism, and 7868 albino,
together with another albino (7748) of similar constitution, follow:

Cross 201.

Mating. Parents. dBr.| W.
628 7749 dil. br. x 7748 albino....| 6 4
637 7677 dil. br. x 7868 albino....| 2 7

8 11

The expectation is equality of white and dilute brown young.

The following case may in one sense be considered as unconformable. It seems probable,
however, that the animal recorded as yellow was a dilute form, for the experiment
occurred early in the series (1907) before I had learned to recognize dilute animals by
sight when young. This animal did not live more than two weeks and could not there-
fore be tested by breeding.

Pink-eyed black agouti x brown.
Cross 202.

Mating. | Parents. | Y? | BAg. | B.

77 | 415 x 409... i] 7a

*Probable incorrect classification.

BIBLIOGRAPHY. 101

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Auten, G. M., 1904. The heredity of coat color in mice. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and
Sci., vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 61-163.

Bateson, W., 1903. The present state of knowledge of colour-heredity in mice and rats.
Proc. Zool. Soc., vol. 2, pp. 71-78.

1909. Mendel’s principles of heredity. Cambridge (Eng.) University Press, 396 pp.

Caste, W. E., 1905. Heredity of coat characters in guinea-pigs and rabbits. Carnegie
Institution of Washington Publication No. 23, 78 pp., 6 plates.

1906. Yellow mice and gametic purity. Science, N.S., vol. 24, pp. 275-280.

———1907a. Ona case of reversion induced by cross-breeding and its fixation. Science,

N.S., vol. 25, pp. 151-153.
—1907b. Color varieties of rabbits and other rodents, their origin and inheritance.
Science, N. §., vol. 26, pp. 287-291.

—-1909. Studies of inheritance in rabbits. Carnegie Institution of Washington Pub-
lication No. 114, 68 pp., 4 plates.

1912a. On the origin of a pink-eyed guinea-pig with colored coat. Science, N. S.,
vol. 35, pp. 508-510.

1912b. On the origin of an albino race of deer-mouse. Science, N. S., vol. 35,
pp. 346-348.

——1912c. The inconstancy of unit characters. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 351-362.
1912d. On the inheritance of the tri-color coat in guinea-pigs and its relation to
Galton’s Law of Ancestral Heredity. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 437-440.
Castiz, W. E., and Lirriz, C. C., 1909. The peculiar inheritance of pink eyes among

colored mice. Science, N. S., vol. 30, pp. 313-314.
——1910. Ona modified mendelian ratio among yellow mice. Science, N. S., vol. 32,
pp. 868-870.

CastLE, W. E. and MacCurpy, H. (See MacCurdy, H.)

CrampE, 1883. Zuchtsversuche mit zahmen Wanderratten, Landwirths. Jahrb., x11, p. 389.

1884. Second paper, Landwirths. Jahrb., x11, p. 699.

Cutnor, L., 1902. La loi de Mendel et l’hérédité de la pigmentation chez les souris. Arch.

Zool. Exp. et Gén. [3], vol. 10, Notes et revue, p. XXVII.

——1903. 2menote. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gén. [4], vol. 1, Notes et revue, p. XXXIII.

— 1904. 3menote. Jbid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 2, pp. XLV-LvI.

——1905. 4me note. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 3, pp. cxxilI-cxxxu.

——1907. 5me note. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 5, p. 1.

—1908. 6me note. Sur quelque anomalies apparentes de proportions mendéliennes.

Ibid. [4], vol. 6, Notes et revue, pp. VII-Xv.
—1911. 7me note, Les déterminants de la couleur chez les souris, étude comparative.
Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 8, pp. XL-LvI.

DarsisHire, A. D., 1902, 1903. Notes on the results of crossing Japanese waltzing mice
with European races, Biometrika, 1, pp. 101-104. Jbid., pp. 165-173, pp.
282-285.

1904. [Second paper], Biometrika, 111, pp. 1-51.

Davenport, C. B., 1904. Color inheritance in mice. Science, N.S8., vol. 19, pp. 110-114.

Doncaster, L., 1906. On the inheritance of coat colour in rats. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.,

vol. 13, pp. 215-227.

Duruaw, F. M., 1908. A preliminary account of the inheritance of coat colour in mice.
Rep. Evol. Comm., 4, p. 41.

1911. Further experiments on the inheritance of coat colour in mice. Journ. Genet.,
vol. 1, pp. 159-178.

East, E. M., and Hayszs, H. K., 1911. Inheritance in maize. Conn. Agri. Exp. Station,

Bull. No. 167.

102 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE.

Gortner, R. A., 1911a. Studies on Melanin IV. Am. Nat., vol. 45, pp. 743-753.
1911b. On Melanin. Biochem. Bull., vol. 1, pp. 207-215.
Guairta, G. von, 1898. Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Rassen des Hausmaus.
Ber. Naturf. Ges. Freiburg, Bd. 10, p. 317.
1900. Zweite Mittheilung tiber Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Rassen
des Hausmaus. Jbid., Bd. 11, p. 181.
Hurst, C. C., 1905. Experimental studies on heredity in rabbits. Linn. Soc. Journ. Zool.,
vol. 29, p. 283.
KEEBLE, F., and Armstrona, E. F., 1912. The réle of oxydases in the formation of the
anthocyan pigments of plants. Journ. Genetics, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 277-306.
Lirrie, C. C., 191la. The “dilute” forms of yellow mice. Science, N. 8., vol. 33, pp.
896-897.
1911b. The influence of heredity and of environment in determining the coat colors
in mice. Science, N.S., vol. 34, p. 563.
1912, Yellow and agouti factors in mice not associated. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp.
491-493.
MacCurpy, H., and Castur, W. E., 1907. Selection and cross-breeding in relation to the
inheritance of coat-pigment and coat-patterns in rats and guinea-pigs.
Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 70, 50 pp., 2 plates.
Morgan, T. H., 1911a. The influence of heredity and of environment in determining the
coat color in mice. Annals N. Y. Acad. of Sci., vol. 21, pp. 87-117, 3 plates.
19116. An attempt to analyze the constitution of the chromosomes on the basis of
: sex-limited inheritance in Drosophila. Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. 11, pp. 365-412,
1 plate.
1911c. Moulting and change of color of coat in mice. Science, N. S., vol. 34, p. 918.
Moupes, G. P., 1908a. On the hereditary transmission of certain coat characters in rats.
Proc. Roy. Soc., Series B, vol. 80, pp. 97-121.
1908b. [Second paper, same title.] Proc. Roy. Soc., Series B, vol. 80, pp. 388-393.
1909a. Note on the chemical nature of albinism. Proc. Physiol. Soc., March 27,
p. LXvil.
1909b. Further note on the chemical nature of albinism. Proc. Physiol. Soc.,
October 23, p. Xv1I.
Puate, L., 1910. Die Erbformeln der Farbenrassen von Mus musculus. Zool. Anz., vol.35,
No. 20, pp. 634-640.
Rivpie, O., 1909. Our knowledge of melanin color formation and its bearing on the
Mendelian description. Biol. Bull., vol. 16, pp. 316-351.
Srurtevant, A. H., 1912. Is there association between the yellow and agouti factors in
mice? Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 368-371.

ELE PLATE 1.

Wild type Black Agouti (Mus musculus), YBrBDPA.

Dilute Black Agouti, YBrBdPA.

Pink-eyed Black Agouti, YBrBDpA.

Pink-eyed dilute Black Agouti, YBrBdpA. 7 AHOEN&CO BALTIMORE

BRwWnNn -

LITTLE PLATE 2.

Brown Agouti, YBrDPA. A HOEN 6.0 BALTIMORE
Dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdPA.

Pink-eyed Brown Agouti, YBrDpA.

Pink-eyed dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdpA

own

LITTLE PLATE 3.

g. Black, YBrBDP.

1o. Dilute Black, YBrBdP.

11. Pink-eyed Black, YBrBDp.

12. Pink-eyed dilute Black, YBrBdp.

A-HOEN & CO BALTIMORE

ace PLATE 4.

A. HOEN&CO BALTIMORE

13. Brown, YBrDPr.

14. Dilute Brown, YBrdP.

15. Pink-eyed Brown, YBrDp.

16. Pink-eyed dilute Brown, YBrdp.

LITTLE

PLATE 5.

A HOEN&CO BALTIMORE
17. Black-eyed Cream (Yellow), YBrBDPR.
18. Brown-eyed Yellow, YBrDPR.
1g. Dilute Brown-eyed Yellow, YBrdPR.
20. Sooty Yellow, YBrDPR.