na a: i | Cornell*University ve OS «* | Library OF THE =, oe cal Hew Work State College of ae «my ae a. eT catiens oe ee oH cms ot ames nS Ses = 16336" ornell University Library he principles of animal nutrition. With Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www. archive.org/details/cu31924003254855 THE PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE NUTRITION OF FARM ANIMALS. BY HENRY PRENTISS ARMSBY, Pu.D., Director of The Pennsylvania State College Agricultural Experiment Station ; Expert in Animal Nutrition, United States Department of Agriculture. FIRST EDITION. FIRST THOUSAND. NEW YORK: JOHN WILEY & SONS. Lonpon: CHAPMAN & HALL, LimiTEp, 1903. Copyright, 1903, BY HENRY P. ARMSBY. ROBERT DRUMMOND, PRINTER, NEW YORE. PREFACE. THE past two decades have not only witnessed great activity in the study of the various problems of animal nutrition, but they are especially distinguished by the new point of view from which these problems have come to be regarded. Speaking broadly, it may be said that to an increasing knowledge of the chemistry of nutrition has been added a clear and fairly definite general conception of the vital activities as transformations of energy and of the food as essentially the vehicle for supplying that energy to the organism. This conception of the function of nutrition has been a fruitful one, and in particular has tended to introduce greater simplicity and unity into thought and discussion. Much exceedingly valuable work has been done under its guidance, while it points the way toward even more important results in the future. The following pages are not a treatise upon stock-feeding, but are an attempt to present in systematic form to students of that subject a summary of our present knowledge of some of the fundamental principles of ani- mal nutrition, particularly from the standpoint of energy relations, with special reference to their bearings upon the nutrition of farm animals. Should the attempt at systematization appear in some instances premature or ill-advised, the writer can only plead that even a temporary or tentative system, if clearly recognized as such, may be preferable to unorganized knowledge. The scaffolding has its uses, even though it form no part of the completed building. The attentive reader, should there be such, will not fail to note that the work is limited to those aspects of the subject included under the more technical term of “The Statistics of Nutrition,” and that even in this restricted field some important branches of the subject have been omitted on account of what has seemed to iii iv PREFACE. the writer a lack of sufficient accurate scientific data for their profit- able discussion. Moreover, many principles which are already familiar have been considered rather cursorily in order to allow a more full treatment of less well-known aspects of the subject, even at the expense of literary proportion. The substance of this volume was given in the form of lectures before the Graduate Summer School of Agriculture at the Ohio State University in 1902, and‘has béen’ prepared for publication at the request of instructors and students of that school. In thus presenting it to a somewhat larger public the author ventures to hope that it may tend in some degree to promote the rational study of stock-feeding and to aid and stimulate systematic investigation into both its principles and practice. Stats Cortez, Pa., November, 1902. CONTENTS. PAGE Inrroptction..... ice Hicte Ket toda Nasal aanasscaualate oe waiee Cage eesigee pase aa ok The Statistics of Nutrition...............606 Seeds welwegarasste US PART I. THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF MATTER. CHAPTER I. Tur Foob........-- Se Cr eee iiss 'eieiiee ele eisiesineieeertssiaie’ «0 CHAPTER II. METABOLISM.....-..-- di Pantha dseualn SE Ga T Ie Wate ete arale Vesa Ce ateass 14 § 1. Carbohydrate Metabolism............ 6. sees cess econ eens 17 § 2. Fat Metabolism. .......... 0. cece cere cece eee e renner eenee 29 § 3. Proteid Metabolism.............eeee eee e tree eee ads anes 38 Anabolisiisgs.c.oeate wan coean relgees oanlae eee Siene teed 38 Kiatabolismts.s da. ciciccc ni Se sine ie nie ba bab acun has 41 The Non-proteids............6.465 idk wwem eae ees 52 CHAPTER III. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION. .......2 0002 eres e cece eens eocceneeees 59 CHAPTER IV. Toe FasTInG METABOLISM. .....--seceserececccccreeceseres vvesen: 180 § 1. The Proteid Metabolism.............0++6+ Javea dae v anes 81 § 2. The Total Metabolism............0-+eeeeeeeeeee peeehes wee 83 CHAPTER V. Tas RELATIONS OF METABOLISM ‘TO FOOD-SUPPLY......0++ee0eeeeee% 93 § 1. The Proteid Supply.........-:.+seeeeeeeees piste ecoatenee 4 Effects on Proteid Metabolism............eseeeeeeeers 94 Effects on Total Metabolism........-...-.20- Saale ates 104 Formation of Fat from Proteids.......+.seseeeeseeees 107 Vv vi CONTENTS. PAGE §2. The Non-nitrogenous Nutrients.......sseceseseessesrscerers 114 Effects on Proteid Metabolism ......cceeecoescecceeeers 114 The Minimum of Proteids............eesseeeeceece 133 Effects on Total Metabolism.........-ceescoseee pares es 144 Mutual Replacement of Nutrients...... is acuge sa avedeve . 148 Utilization of Excess—Sources of Fat.....+..+,-+++ 162 CHAPTER VI. Tse INFLUENCE oF MuscuLAR EXERTION UPON METABOLISM........-- 185 §1. General Features of Muscular Activity...........seeeeeeeees 185 Muscular Contraction. .........c cee ere cece cen eceeeecs 185 Secondary Effects of Muscular Exertion.............+-- 191 §2. Effects upon Metabolism............- es RG Se SS FOE Ee MSE 193 Upon the Proteid Metabolism. ............0seeeeee scene 194 Upon the Carbon Metabolism........-- ita © oreo W ekaner ne aise 209 PART II. THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF ENERGY. CHAPTER VII. FORCE AND ENERGY..... 00s c cece cece een eeeneeeeoeee a sigrenie CESS 226 CHAPTER VIII. Metuons oF INVESTIGATION ............2ceceeeevees AOC RE Io 234 CHAPTER IX. Tur CoNSERVATION or ENERGY IN THE ANIMAL Bopy......... Bea ako 258 CHAPTER X. Tue Foon as a Source or ENercy—METABOLIZABLE ENERGY........ 269 § 1. Experiments on Carnivora... 2.0.0... cc ccc eee cece eee eeeees 272 § 2. Experiments on Man......... cece cece cece teen eee eees 277 § 3. Experiments on Herbivora.................+ Sisases Sebo’ a 281 Metabolizable Energy of Organic Matter................ 284 Total Organic Matter........... cece cece ce ee ee eee 285 Digestible Organic Matter...........--. cc cee eens 297 Energy of Digestible Nutrients.............:c.cceeeees 302 Gross Energy... .... cc ceeceee cee eeeeeens eames a 302 Metabolizable Energy......csceccscssceeecccecees S10 CONTENTS. vii CHAPTER XI. PAGE egret WY ae ig ais ws ace a wee Ws 2 pas caews sida we 336 § 1. The Expenditure of Energy by the Body.............200e005 336 §2. The Fasting Metabolism............. 0.0... cc eee ccecceces 340 Nature of Demands for Energy...............seceeeeees 340 Heat Production. ............0cccccccceccececcvecrecs 344 Influence of Thermal Environment ...............- 347 Influence of Size of Animal ...............cceeeees 359 § 3. The Expenditure of Energy in Digestion and Assimilation..... 372 CHAPTER XII. Net AvamaBLe ENERGY—MAINTENANCE......cccceeccccecccccececs 394 §1. Replacement Values................ccccececeeeeeereeees .. 896 §2. Modified Conception of Replacement Values..............+60 405 §3. Net Availability... 2.0... ccc cece cece ene e ene eeeees 412 Determinations of Net Availability ..............0..00. 413 Discussion of Results........... 000 ccc cece reeee een 430 Influence of Amount of Food .............cceeeuees 430 Character of Food..........0.0ccceeeeeceeeceeneee 431 The Maintenance Ration...........cccceccceeeeees 432 CHAPTER XIII. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY.......0c cece ce cece ac ceeeeceneeseesees 444 $1. Utilization for Tissue Building.......... eee e eee ee en enetoees 448 Experimental Results. ..............0 0 ce eeee nsec rece 448 Discussion of Results...........00cceecceceecseceeees 465 Influence of Amount of Food..........eceeeeeeeees 466 Influence of Thermal Environment..............60. 471 Influence of Character of Food............0.0eeea0e 472 The Expenditure of Energy in Digestion, Assimilation and Tissue Building...............0eeeceee eee ee 491 §2. Utilization for Muscular Work......... 06. c cece cece eee eee 494 Utilization of Net Available Energy........... sistalavere ars 497 The Efficiency of the Animal as a Motor............ 498 Conditions determining Efficiency.................. 511 Utilization of Metaholizable Energy............----22.4 525 Wolff's Investigations........c0 esc ee eee cece eene 528 “THE PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. INTRODUCTION. Tue body of an animal, regarded from a chemical point of view, consists of an aggregate of a great variety of substances, of which water, protein, and the fats, with smaller amounts of certain carbohydrates, largely predominate. By far the greater portion of the substance of the body, aside from its water, consists of so- called “ organic” compounds; i.e., compounds of carbon with hydro- gen, oxygen, nitrogen, and, to a smaller extent, with sulphur and phosphorus. These compounds are in many cases very complex, and all of them have this in common, that they contain a con- siderable store of potential energy. It is through these complex “ organic” compounds that the phe- nomena of life are manifested. All forms of life with which we are acquainted are intimately associated with the conversion of com- plex into simpler compounds by a series of changes which, regarded as a whole, partake of the nature of oxidations. During this break- ing down and oxidation more or less of the potential energy of these compounds is liberated, and it is this liberation of energy which is the essential end and object of the whole process and which, if not synonymous with life itself, is the objective manifestation of life. This is equally true of the plant and the animal, although masked in the case of green plants by the synthetic activity of the chloro- phy] in the presence of light. The process is most manifest in the animal, however, both on account of the inability of the latter to utilize the radiant energy of the sun and on account of the greater intensity of the process itself. Setting aside for the moment any storing up of material, and I 2 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. therefore of potential energy, in the body for the future use of the animal itself or of its offspring as being, from a physiological point of view, temporary and incidental, the sole useful product of the animal is energy. All the physical effect which we can produce, either through our own bodies or those of our domestic animals, is simply to move something, and moving something is equivalent to the exertion of energy. This motion may be the motion of visible masses of matter in the performance of useful work or the invisible molecular motion of heat, which is economically a waste product, but in either case the animal is a source of energy which is imparted to its surroundings. From this point of view, then, we may look upon the animal as a mechanism for transforming the stored-up energy of the sun’s rays, contained in its tissues, into the active or “kinetic” forms of heat and motion. The various cells and tissues of the living animal body, in the performance of their several func- tions, break down and oxidize the proteids, fats, carbohydrates, and other materials of which they are composed or which are con- tained in them, seizing, as it were, upon the energy thus liberated and converting it, here into heat, there into motion, again into the energy of chemical change, as the needs of the organism demand. The very definition of physical life, then, implies that the living animal is constantly consuming its own substance, rejecting the simpler compounds which result and giving off energy in the various forms characteristic of living beings. Obviously, this process, if unchecked, would soon lead to the destruction of the organism and the dissipation of its store of potential energy. To prevent this catastrophe is the object of the great function of nutrition. This function, in its broader outlines, is familiar to us all through daily experience and observation. The living animal requires to be frequently supplied with certain substances which collectively constitute its food. This food contains a great variety of chemical ingredients, but much the larger part of it consists of “organic” compounds belonging to the three great groups already noted as making up the larger share of the organic matter of the body, viz., the proteids, the fats, and especially the carbohydrates, and while the individual members of these groups differ in the two cases, the ingredients of the food, like those of the body, contain a large store of potential energy. These and other “organic” substances, INTRODUCTION. 3 together with more or less mineral matter, are separated by the organism, in the processes of digestion and resorption, from the un- essential or unavailable matters of the food. The latter are rejected from the body, while the former are used by it to take the place of the material broken down and excreted by its vital activities, and thus serve to maintain its capital of matter and of potential energy. In other words, the food may be regarded as the vehicle by means of which a little portion of the “infinite and eternal energy from which all things proceed ” is put for the time being at the service of the individual ; as being not so much a supply of matter to make good the waste of tissue as a supply of energy for the mani- festations of life. The animal body, then, from our present standpoint, consists of a certain amount of matter which has been temporarily segregated from the rest of the universe and which represents a certain store or capital of potential energy. This aggregate of matter and energy is in a constant state of change or flux. On the one hand, its vital activities are continually drawing upon its capital. By the very act of living it expends matter and energy. On the other hand, by means of the function of nutrition, it is continually receiv- ing supplies of matter and energy from its environment and adding them to its capital. Plainly, then, the growth, the maintenance, or the decay of the bedy depends upon the relation which it is able to maintain between the income and the expenditure of matter and energy. If the two are equal], the animal is simply maintained without increase or decrease; if the income is greater than the expenditure, the body adds to its capital of matter and energy, if the income is less than the expenditure, the necessary result is a diminution in the accumulated capital which, if continued, must ultimately result in death. We thus reach an essentially statistical standpoint, and this’ aspect of the subject of nutrition, which has been designated by some writers as “The Statistics of Nutrition,” forms the subject of the succeeding pages. The topic naturally divides itself into two distinct although closely related parts, viz.: 1. The income and expenditure of matter. 2. The income and expenditure of energy. 4 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. These topics will be considered in the above order, it being assumed that the reader is already familiar with the general nature of the nutritive processes included under the general heads of digestion, resorption, circulation, respiration, and excretion. PART I. THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF MATTER. CHAPTER I. THE FOOD. THE supply of matter to the body is, of course, contained in the food, including water and the oxygen taken up from the air. In a more limited and familiar sense, the term food is employed to signify the supply of solid matter, or dry matter, to the animal. It is proposed here simply to recall certain familiar facts relative to the composition and digestibility of the food in this narrower sense, taking up the subject in the barest outline. Composition.—While a vast number of individual chemical compounds are found in common feeding-stuffs, the conventional scheme for their analysis unites these substances into groups and regards feeding-stuffs as composed, aside from water and mineral matter, essentially of protein, carbohydrates and related bodies, and fats. Or, setting aside the mineral ingredients, the “organic” ingredients may be divided into the nitrogenous, comprised under the term protein, and the non-nitrogenous, including the fats and carbohydrates. Protein.—The name “protein” originated with Mulder, who used it to designate what he supposed to be a common ingredient of all the various proteids, but it has since come to be employed as a group name for the nitrogenous ingredients both of feeding-stuffs and of the animal body. The amount of protein in feeding-stuffs we have at present no 5 6 RINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. means of determining directly, but it is commonly estimated from the amount of nitrogen upon two assumptions: first, that all the substances of the protein group contain 16 per cent. of nitrogen, and second, that all the nitrogen of feeding-stuffs exists in the proteid, form. On the basis of these assumptions, protein is, of course, -equal to total nitrogen x 6.25. Although it was never claimed that this method of estimating protein was strictly accurate, it was for a long time assumed that ‘the two sources of error involved were not serious. Later investi- gations, however, have dispelled this pleasing illusion. Further investigations of the true proteids, notably those of Ritthausen and of Osborne, have shown a very considerable variation in the per- centage of nitrogen contained in them, while, on the other hand, the researches of Scheibler, E. Schulze, Kellner, and others have shown the presence in many feeding-stuffs of relatively large amounts of _ nitrogenous matters of non-proteid nature. The results of these latter investigations have made it necessary to subdivide the total nitrogenous matter of feeding-stuffs into two groups, called respec- tively “proteids” and “non-proteids,” while the name “ protein” has been retained in the sense of total nitrogen X 6.25 or other con- ventional factor. For various classes of human foods, Atwater and Bryant * propose the following factors, based on the results in- dicated in the next two paragraphs, for the computation of protein from nitrogen: Animal, f00d8s«ws raesie waned sacavacswalsctaedsa eas 6.25 Wheat, rye, barley, and their manufactured products 5.70 Maize, oats, buckwheat and rice, and their manufactured PIOdUCtS: sic des hie Glew away Gee cate 6.00 Dried seeds of legumes. ............0 000 cee ee eee 6.25 WGHETADICR: i. exten miapanee ts Sekai ndcaGgunieeew te 5.65 PURUIUS criss elie aw Bat Oh ges Sone a eee AW nom eee MY 5.80 Proteids.—In the absence of any adequate knowledge regarding the very complex molecular structure of the proteids, both the classification and the terminology of these bodies are in a very con- fused state. For convenience, however, we may adopt here those * Storrs (Conn.) Ag. Ex. St., Rep. 12, 79, THE FOOD. 7 tentatively recommended by the Association of American Agri- cultural Colleges and Experiment Stations,* viz.: é Albumins, Simple Globulins, Albuminoids Derval. Modified } Compound. a Collagens or gelatinoids : Extractives, Amides, amido-acids, etc. Protein. Total : nitrogen com- | Proteids | } pounds { Non-proteids | It is not necessary for our present purpose to enter into any dis- cussion either of the properties of the proteids as a whole or of the differences between the different classes of proteids. One point, however, is of particular importance, namely, the elementary com- position of these bodies. As noted above, this has been found to be more variable than was supposed earlier. In particular the per- centage of nitrogen has been found to have a somewhat wide range. “Recent investigations with perfected methods show percentages of nitrogen in the numerous single proteid substances found in the grains ranging from 15.25 to 18.78. These are largest in certain oil seeds and lupines and smallest in some of the winter grains. Ritthausen,t a prominent German authority, concedes that the factor 6.25 should be discarded, and suggests the use of 5.7 for the majority of cereal grains and leguminous seeds, 5.5 for the oil and lupine seeds, and 6.00 for barley, maize, buckwheat, soja-bean, and white bean (Phaseolus) rape, and other brassicas. Nothing short of inability to secure greater accuracy justifies the longer contin- uance of a method of calculation which is apparently so greatly erroneous.” (Jordan.) Non-proteids——This term is used as a convenient designation for all the nitrogenous materials of feeding-stuffs which are not proteid in their nature. It is an abbreviated form of non-proteid nitrogenous bodies. The substances of this class found in plants are chiefly the organic bases, amides, amido-acids, and similar bodies which are produced by the cleavage of the proteid molecule under the action of digestive and other ferments or of hydrating agents. They appear to exist in the plant partly as intermediate stages in the synthesis of the proteids and partly as products of *U.S. Dept. Agr., Office of Experiment Station, Bul., 65, p. 117, + Landw. Vers. Stat., 74, 391. and allies. dD i. 52 i # 8 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. their subsequent cleavage in the metabolism of the plant. They are chiefly soluble, crystalline bodies. The most common of them is asparagin, which has been, to a certain extent, regarded as typical of the group. The non-proteids are commonly determined by determining as accurately as possible the non-proteid nitrogen and multiplying the latter by the factor 6.25. In the case of asparagin, however, which contains 21.2 per cent. of nitrogen, the proper factor obviously should be 4.7, while the factor would vary for the different forms of non-proteids which have been observed in plants. It is no simple matter, therefore, either to determine directly the amount of non- proteids or to decide upon the proper nitrogen factor in any partic- ular case. For the present, however, the factor 4.7 would seem to be at least a closer approximation to the truth than 6.25. ° In the animal body the group of non-proteids is represented by the so-called “extractives” or “flesh bases’’ of the muscle, chiefly creatin and creatinin. Fats.—The fats of the plant, like those of the animal, consist chiefly of glycerin compounds of the so-called “fatty acids,” or of similar bodies. These are accompanied in the plant, however, by other materials—wax, chlorophyl, ete.—which are extracted along with the fat by the common method of determination and consti- tute part of the “crude fat” or “ether-extract.” The results, therefore, which have been obtained in feeding experiments with’ pure fats cannot be used with safety as a basis for estimating the nutritive value of the so-called “fat” of feeding-stuffs, particularly in the case of coarse fodders. CarBouyDRATES.— The well-characterized group of carbo- hydrates makes up a large proportion of the organic matter of our more common feeding-stuffs. This group of substances may be sub- divided on the basis of molecular structure into hexosans and their derivatives (hexoses, bioses, trioses, etc.), on the one hand, whose molecules contain six atoms of carbon or a multiple of that number, and the pentosans and pentoses, or five-carbon series, on the other. In the grains and other common concentrated feeding-stuffs, and particularly in the food of man, the hexose group largely predomi- nates, including starch, dexfrin, the common sugars, and more or less cellulose. In the coarse fodders consumed by our domestic THE FOOD. 9 herbivorous animals, while the hexose group is also largely repre- sented it is accompanied by no inconsiderable quantities of carbo- hydrates belonging to the pentose group. The individual members of this latter group are both less abundant and less well known chemically than the hexoses, and at present our knowledge of their actual nutritive value is somewhat scanty. Since the methods for their determination are based upon the fact that they yield furfural upon boiling with dilute hydrochloric acid, some recent analysts have proposed the term “furfuroids” as a more appropriate desig- nation of these substances as determined by present methods. In the conventional scheme for the analysis of feeding-stuffs, the carbohydrates are subdivided, not upon the basis of their chemical structure but upon the basis of their solubility. Those members of the group which can be brought into solution by boiling dilute acids and alkalies under certain conventional conditions are grouped together as “Nitrogen-free extract,’ while those ingredients which resist solution under these conditions are designated as “Crude fiber.” The more common hexose carbohydrates, such as starch, sugars, etc., are included in the nitrogen-free extract, while the larger part, although not all, of the cellulose is included under the crude fiber. At the same time, more or less of the pentose carbo- hydrates or “furfuroids” are found in both these groups, while the crude fiber of coarse fodders contains also a variety of other ill- known compounds, somewhat roughly grouped together under the general designation of ligneous material. Digestibility.—A part of nearly all common food materials is incapable of digestion and is rejected in the feces. In the food of man and that of carnivorous animals this indigestible portion is usually small and may disappear entirely. In the food of herbivora,. on the other hand, there are contained relatively large amounts of substances which are incapable of solution in the digestive tract, while varying proportions of materials which in themselves are capable of being digested may escape actual digestion under some circumstances. In the latter animals, therefore, it becomes par- ticulary important to determine the digestible portion of the food. The digestibility of a feeding-stuff is estimated indirectly by deter- mining as accurately as possible the unfligested matter eliminated from the body in the feces and subtracting it from the total amount 10 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. contained in the food. This method may of course be applied either to the dry matter or the organic matter of the food as a whole or to any single determinable ingredient. ' Merazotic Propucts.—The digestive tract of an animal, how- ever, not only serves as a mechanism for the digestion of food but has excretory functions as well, and the rejected matter contains, besides the undigested portion of the food, these excreta and the metabolic products of intestinal action. In the case of food largely or completely digestible, these substances may make up the larger portion or even the whole of the feces, while, on the other hand, * they constitute but a small proportion of the bulky excreta of herbivora. It is obvious that these products must be taken account of if it is desired to learn the actual digestibility of the food. Unfortunately, however, we have at present no trustworthy method for their deter- mination. In the past it has been customary to designate the difference between food and feces as digestible and, in the case of domestic animals at least, to assume that the error involved is not serious. Apparent Digestibility—Availability—Even with herbivo- rous animals, however, the presence of the so-called metabolic products in the feces may give rise to serious errors in the deter- mination of the real digestibility of some ingredients of the food, notably fat and protein. With carnivora, or with the human subject, the case is for obvious reasons still worse, and it is scarcely possible to determine the digestibility of the food in the strict sense of the word. The difference between food and feces does represent, however, the net gain of matter to the organism resulting from the digestion of the food. To express this conception, the use of the word avail- able has been proposed by Atwater.* The “available nutrients” of a food, according to him, are the actually digestible nutrients minus the metabolic products contained in the feces and which may be regarded as representing the expenditure of matter, in the form of residues of digestive fluids, intestinal mucus, epithelium, ete. necessarily incident to the digestion of the food. The term has been * Storrs (Conn.) Agr’] Expt. St., Rep., 12, 69. THE FOOD. Ir used chiefly in connection with human nutrition. In discussions of animal nutrition the terms digestible and digestibility have become so firmly established that it may be questioned whether the intro- duction now of a new term would not create more confusion than it would prevent, and whether it is not preferable, when strict accuracy of expression is required, to attach a modifying word and designate the difference between food and feces as apparently digestible, in distinction from the real digestibility, which we cannot as yet deter- mine. DETERMINATION OF APPARENT DIGESTIBILITY.—The determi- nation of the apparent digestibility of the nutrients of a feeding- stuff in the above sense, or of their “ digestibility ” in the older sense, consists simply in determining the amount of the feces or of their separate ingredients and comparing them with the correspond- ing amounts in the food. Aside from ordinary analytical precautions, the chief condition of accurate results is that the feces correspond to the food consumed. In animals with a comparatively simple digestive canal, like man and the carnivora, this is readily brought about by the ingestion of a small amount of some substance like powdered charcoal or infu- sorial earth, which is in itself indigestible and which serves to sepa- rate the feces of two successive periods. In the case of herbivora, on the other hand, the undigested residues of the food become mixed to a large extent with those of the previous period. In this case, therefore, it is essential that a preliminary feeding be continued for a sufficient length of time to remove the residues of previous foods from the digestive organs, and further that the experiment itself extend through a number of days in order to eliminate the influence of irregularity of excretion. SIGNIFICANCE OF Resutts.—It is plain from what has just been said that what the results of such an experiment actually show is that a certain amount of material has disappeared from the food during its transit through the alimentary canal. This fact of itself. however, does not necessarily show that the missing material has been digested in any true sense. In the case of animals possessing a relatively short and simple digestive apparatus, we are probably justified in assuming that the difference between food and undigested matter represents material that has actually been 12 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. digested. In the long and complicated digestive apparatus of herbivora, however, there is the possibility that a variety of proc- esses may go on aside from a simple solution of nutrients by the digestive fluids. In particular, it has been shown, as will appear in greater detail later, that extensive fermentations, particularly of the carbohydrates, occur, and that relatively large amounts of these bodies may be destroyed in this way. Furthermore, with our present conventional scheme for fodder analysis, we have to take account of the possibility of the conversion of members of one group of nutrients into those of another. For example, it seems not improbable that a portion of the crude fiber of feeding-stuffs may be so modified in the digestive tract, without being actually dissolved, that, in the feces, it is determined as nitrogen-free extract, thus diminishing the apparent digestibility of the latter group and increasing that of the crude fiber.* Composition oF Diczstep Foop.—The proteids during the process of digestion are largely converted into proteoses and pep- tones, while the trypsin of the pancreatic juice, at least outside the body, carries the cleavage of the proteid molecule still further and gives rise to comparatively simple, crystalline bodies. It is not altogether clear to what extent this degradation of the proteids occurs in natural digestion, but the probability appears to be that it does not play a large part, and it has been generally believed that the proteids are resorbed chiefly as proteoses and peptones. The non-proteids being largely crystalline bodies and readily soluble, we may presume that they are resorbed without material change except so far as they may serve as nitrogenous food for the micro-organisms of the digestive tract. The jat of the food does not undergo any profound change in digestion, but appears to be resorbed largely in the form of an emulsion. A part of it, however, is undoubtedly saponified by the bile, although the extent to which this process takes place is a disputed point, while in some cases at least a cleavage into glycerin and free fatty acids appears to take place. The carbohydrates, particularly the easily soluble members of the hexose group, are in the case of man and the carnivora, and *Cf. Fraps, Jour. Am. Chem. Soc., 22, 543. THE FOOD. 13 probably also to a large extent in the swine and horse, converted into sugars and resorbed in that form. Fermentations.—Reference has already been made to the fermen- tations taking place in the digestive tract. In the herbivora, and especially in ruminants, these fermentations play an important part in the solution of the carbohydrates which make up so large a portion of the food of these animals. These bodies undergo a fermentation which was first studied by Tappeiner * in the case of cellulose, but which has since been shown by G. Kiihn + to extend also to the more soluble carbohydrates. The products of this fermentation appear to be methane, carbon dioxide, and organic acids, chiefly, according to Tappeiner, acetic and butyric. Of these products, only the organic acids at best can be supposed to be of any value to the animal organism, and obviously it makes a very serious difference in our estimate of the nutritive value of starch, for example, whether it is resorbed chiefly or entirely in the form of sugar or whether in a ruminant more than half of it, as in some df Kiihn’s experiments, is fermented. * Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 52. + Landw. Vers. Stat., 44, 569. CHAPTER II. METABOLISM. General Conception.—By the various processes of digestion and resorption the epithelium of the alimentary canal extracts from the crude materials eaten those ingredients which are fitted to nourish the animal and transmits them more or less directly to the general circulation which carries them to all the tissues of the body. While these ingredients are many in number and diverse in charac- ter, yet the vast mass of them, aside from the water in which most of them are dissolved, may be grouped under six heads, viz., ash ingredients, albuminoids or bodies related to the alburminoids, amides and other crystalline nitrogenous substances, fats, carbo- hydrates, and organic acids, and these, together with relatively small amounts of other materials, may be regarded as constituting the real food of the organism. As was pointed out in the Introduction, the cells of which the living tissues of the animal body are composed are the seat of con- tinual chemical change. On the one hand, the digested ingredients of the food which are brought to them by the circulation are being built up into the structure of the body. On the other hand, the material of the cells is undergoing a continual process of breaking down and oxidation, uniting with the oxygen supplied by the blood to form the waste products which are removed from the body through the organs of excretion. These excretory products are substantially carbon dioxide, water, and urea and similar nitroge- nous substances. The general term Metabolism is commonly used to designate the totality of the chemical and physical changes which the materials of the resorbed food, or of the tissues formed from them, undergo in being converted into the excretory products. Similarly, we may speak in a more restricted sense of the metabolism of a single ingre- 14 METABOLISM. 15 dient of the food, as of the proteids, carbohydrates, or fats. Thus proteid metabolism signifies the chemical changes undergone by the proteids of the food in their conversion into the corresponding excretory products. In ordinary usage the chemical reactions undergone by the ash ingredients of the food are not included, the word metabolism being practically used to designate the chemical changes in the organic matter of food or tissue. METaBoLismM A ProcEess OF OxipaTion.—The process of met- abolism as a whole is one of oxidation. While we must beware of being misled by analogy into regarding as a simple burning of food-materials that which is in reality a highly complex action of the living cells of the organism, still the final result is much the same in both cases. Starting with more or less complex organic substances and oxygen, we end either with the completely oxidized compounds carbon dioxide and water or with nitrogenous sub- stances like urea more highly oxidized than the protein from which they are derived. The oxidative character of the total metabolism is most simply illustrated by a comparison of the percentage of oxygen contained in the most prominent ingredients of the food, on the one hand, and in the chief excretory products, on the other hand, as in the follow- ing statement: Percentage of Oxygen. In food: Protein (average)... .... 0. eee eeeeeeeeee 23.00 Patsices kaos +a ae oo La ees ee se 11.50 Dextrose: scsi i ataeeaimaneaeews eee oe 53.33 In excreta: 80a eet ined haa wh aie eee 26.67 Carbon dioxide........ccceeeeeeeceees 72.72 WAtET wicca odoge sg dae e ews eve esas sais 88.89 Merapoiism aN ANALYTIC Procress.—From a slightly different point of view, metabolism,may be described as an analytic process. The molecules of the food constituents are highly complex. The molecule of dextrose or levulose, the forms in which the carbo- hydrates are chiefly resorbed, contains 24 atoms; the molecules of 16 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the three most common fats, respectively 155, 167, and 173 atoms. The molecular structure of the proteids has not yet been made out, but it is highly complex.* The molecules of the excretory prod- ucts, on the contrary, are comparatively simple, those of carbon dioxide and water containing but three atoms each, that of urea eight, and even that of hippuric acid but twenty-two. In metabolism, in other words, the complex molecules of the carbohydrates, fats, proteids, etc., which have been built up in the plant, by means of the energy contained in the sun’s rays, out of carbon dioxide, water, and nitric acid or ammonia, gradually break down again into simpler compounds, their atoms reuniting with the oxygen from which they were separated in the plant. Meraso.ism 4 GRADUAL Process.—The chemical changes in- cluded under the term metabolism take place gradually. As has already been indicated, metabolism is not a simple oxidation of nutrients, like the burning of fuel in a stove, but the nutrients enter, to a large extent at least, into the structure of the cells of which the various tissues are composed. Metabolism is really the sum of the chemical actions through which the nutrition and life of these cells is manifested. These actions, however, differ from tissue to tissue and from cell to cell, and even in the same cell from time to time, and the resulting metabolic products are correspondingly varied. Between the nutrients supplied to the cells by the blood and the final products of metabolism as excreted from the body there are innumerable intermediate products, a few of which we know but concerning most of which we are still ignorant. We know the first and last terms of the series and thus are able to measure, as it were, the algebraic sum of the changes, but of the single factors making up this sum. as well as of the specific tissues concerned in the changes, we are largely ignorant, although we know that they are numerous. ANABOLISM AND Karanotism.—While the process of metab- olism as a whole is one of analysis and oxidation, with liberation of energy, it must not be supposed that each single step in the process is of this nature. As has been already pointed out, the chemical activities of the tissues possess a dual character. By the * Osborne (Zeit. physiol. Chem., 33, 240) has recently obtained the number 14,500 as the approximate molecular weight of edestin. METABOLISM. 17 various processes of nutrition, ingredients of the food are first incor- porated into the tissues of the body, to be subsequently broken down and oxidized. In this building-up process changes undoubt- edly occur in the direction of greater complexity of molecular struc- ture, involving the temporary absorption of energy. Thus it is known that fats may be formed from carbohydrates in the body. Many physiologists hold that the metabolism in the quiescent muscle results in the building up of a complex “contractile substance,” whose breaking down furnishes the energy for muscular work. In general, we may regard it as highly probable that the molecules of the living substance of the body are much more complex than those of the nutrients of the food, and that the former are built up out of the latter by synthetic processes, carried on at the expense of energy derived from the breaking down of other molecules. Such changes as this are called anabolic and the process anabolism, while the changes in the direction of greater simplicity of molecular structure are called katabolic, and the process katabolism. The metabolism of the living body, then, consists of both anabolism and katabolism. By the former the food nutrients are built up into body material; by the latter they are broken down, yielding finally the compara- tively simple excretory products. On the whole, however, the katabolism prevails over the anabolism, so that metabolism as a whole is, as already stated, an analytic and oxidative process. Neither the anabolism of tissue production nor the minor anabolic changes which seem to occur in various tissues alter the main direc- tion of the metabolic changes in the body, but, from the standpoint of the statistics of nutrition, are simply eddies in the main current §1. Carbohydrate Metabolism. : HEXOSE CARBOHYDRATES. The hexose carbohydrates of the food appear to be resorbed chiefly by the capillary blood-vessels of the intestines. For the most part, they reach the blood in the form of dextrose, with smaller amounts of levulose and with greater or less quantities of acetic, butyric, lactic, and other acids derived chiefly from the fermenta- tion of the carbohydrates in the digestive tract. In the general circulation only dextrose is found. 18 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The percentage of dextrose in the blood is small, but remarkably constant, the limits of variation being from about 0.11 to about 0.20 per cent., and the average about 0.15 per cent. Its amount varies but slightly in different regions of the body, and in different classes of animals, and is scarcely at all affected by the nature or amount of the food. Not only so, but any excess of dextrose in the blood is promptly gotten rid of. It is astriking fact that if any con- siderable amount of this substance, which forms so large a part of the resorbed nutriment, be injected directly into the blood it is ‘ treated as an intruder and at once excreted through the kidneys. Evidently it is of the greatest importance to the organism that the supply of this substance to the tissues shall be constant. Under ordinary conditions, however, the influx of sugar from the digestive tract is more or less intermittent. After a meal rich in easily digestible carbohydrates, an abundant supply of it is taken up by the intestinal capillaries, while on a diet poor in carbohydrates. or in prolonged fasting, the supply sinks to a minimum. This is, of course, especially true of animals like man and the carnivora in which the process of digestion is comparatively rapid, but even in herbivorous animals, with their more complicated digestive appara- tus, the rate of resorption of dextrose, and still more its absolute amount, must be more or less fluctuating. Evidently there must be some regulative apparatus which holds back from the general circu- ation any excess of dextrose, on the one hand, and prevents its being excreted unused, and on the other, supplements any lack resulting from a deficiency of the food in carbohydrates. This regulation is accomplished by the liver. Functions of the Liver. The functions of the liver in this regard appear to be twofold: First, it manufactures dextrose and supplies it to the general circu- \ation; and second, it serves as a reservoir, or a place of deposit, for any excess of carbohydrates supplied by the digestive apparatus. Tue Liver as a Source or Dexrrosz.—The blood as it comes from the intestinal capillaries, bearing the digested carbo- hydrates and proteids, enters the liver through the portal vein and is distributed by means of the capillary blood-vessels into which this vein divides through all parts of that organ, reaching the general METABOLISM. 19 circulation again through the hepatic vein. In its passage through the capillaries of the liver, the blood is subjected to the action of the cells of the liver (hepatic cells); Our knowledge of the exact nature of this action is still more or less conjectural, in spite of a vast amount of experimental investigation, but certain general facts are pretty clearly established. In the first place, the hepatic cells appear to serve as a source of dextrose when no carbohydrates are supplied in the food. If a carnivorous animal be given a diet as free as possible from carbo- hydrates, as, for instance, prepared lean meat, consisting substan- tially of proteids, its blood still contains a normal amount of dex- trose and the blood in the hepatic vein is found to be richer in dextrose than that of the portal vein, showing that this substance is being formed in the liver. Moreover, while the percentage of dextrose in the blood is small, the total amount thus manufactured is very considerable. Seegen * estimates it at about one per cent. of the weight of the body in twenty-four hours. This is regarded by many physiologists as an overestimate, the considerable differ- ences in sugar content between the portal and hepatic blood found by Seegen being regarded as in part the effect of the necessary operation. Indeed, it is questioned by some whether any actual difference in sugar content between the portal and hepatic blood under normal conditions has been satisfactorily established analyti- cally, but the indirect evidence at least seems strongly in its favor. In the second place, the same outflow of dextrose from the liver appears to take place when the animal consumes a mixed diet con- taining carbohydrates. In this case also, except shortly after a meal containing much carbohydrates, the blood of the hepatic vein shows an excess of dextrose over that of the portal vein. The amount of dextrose thus introduced into the circulation is sub- stantially the same as in the first case, and its percentage in the blood is not perceptibly altered. The source of this dextrose, how- ever, is not so simple a question, since it is possible that all or a considerable portion of it may be supplied directly or indirectly by the dextrose resorbed by the intestinal capillaries. Granting the continual production of sugar by the liver, sub- * Die Zuckerbildung im Thierkérper, p. 115. 20 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. stantially two suppositions are open: On the one hand, we may consider that the resorbed carbohydrates of the food, after being temporarily stored up in the liver, as described below, are given off again without radical change and that the sugar-forming power of the hepatic cells is limited to the transformation of the proteids and perhaps the fats of the food. Or, on the other hand, we may sup- pose that the nutrients brought to the liver by the portal blood enter into the constitution of the protoplasm of the hepatic cells, and that the vital activity of this protoplasm gives rise to the dex- trose found in the blood, to the glycogen found in the liver, and to other products of whose nature we are largely ignorant. The evidence at hand is doubtless insufficient for a final decision between these alternatives, but the latter hypothesis would seem more in accord with our general knowledge of cell activity. As relates to the carbohydrates, it is supported by the fact that while various sugars besides dextrose (levulose, mannose, galactose, sorbinose, and, as Miinch * has shown, certain artificial hexoses) may be con- verted into glycogen, the resulting glycogen is always the same and the product of its hydration is always dextrose.t In other words, the molecular structure of these sugars is altered in a manner sug- gesting an assimilation by the hepatic cells rather than anything resembling an enzyme action. The subject can be more intelli- gently considered, however, in the light of a discussion of the second function of the liver. Tue Liver as A RESERVOIR OF CARBOHYDRATES.—When the food is rich in carbohydrates, the supply of dextrose to the blood through the intestinal capillaries is more or less intermittent. As a means of regulating this intermittent supply, the hepatic cells have the power of arresting the dextrose brought to them by the portal vein and converting it into an insoluble carbohydrate called “glycogen” or “animal starch” which is stored up in the liver. On the other hand, when the supply of carbohydrate food is cut off, and especially if all food be withdrawn, the glycogen of the liver rapidly diminishes, being apparently reconverted into dextrose. This latter phenomenon may be readily observed in the liver of a freshly killed animal. If the fresh liver, after removal from the *Zeit. physiol. Chem . 29, 493. {Compare Neumeister. Physiologische Chemie, p. 326 METABOLISM. 20 body, be washed out by water injected through the portal vein till all sugar is removed, and if then, after standing for a time, the wash- ing be renewed, the first portions of water that pass contain sugar. The same process may be repeated several times. What is known as the glycogenic function of the liver was dis- covered by Claude Bernard in 1853, and has been the subject of a bewildering amount of discussion. and controversy, both as to the origin of glycogen, its final fate, and its relations to the production of dextrose by the liver. Certain facts, however, may be regarded as established with at least a high degree of probability: Firsi—The liver produces glycogen from dextrose and other (not all) carbohydrates, as above described. Second—The liver seems also to form glycogen from proteids, since this substance is found in considerable quantity in the livers of animals fed exclusively on meat. Third—Glycogen largely disappears from the liver during fast- ing, and to a considerable degree also in the absence of carbo- hydrates from the food. Fourth—The liver produces dextrose at an approximately con- stant rate, largely independent of the food-supply or the variations in the store of glycogen. These facts seem to point unmistakably to the sugar-producing function of the liver as the primary factor in the whole matter. The general metabolism of the body requires a constant proportion of dextrose in the blood, and as this dextrose is consumed the liver furnishes a fresh supply. This supply it manufactures from the materials brought to it by the blood of the portal vein. When carbohydrates are lacking in this blood, it apparently has the power of breaking down the proteids and perhaps the fats, thus supplying the needful dextrose. Some authorities claim that the same process goes on when carbohydrates are present, and it seems not unlikely that this is true, but when the food-supply consists so largely of carbohydrates as it does in the case of our domestic herbivorous animals, the conclusion seems unavoidable that at least a consider- able part of the dextrose consumed in the body must be derived from these substances. As already suggested, a very plausible view of the matter is to regard the resorbed nutrients of the portal blood as serving to feed the protoplasm of the hepatic cells and to look 22 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. upon the dextrose as one of the products of the metabolism of those cells. Since, however, the demands of the organism for dextrose and the supply of it, or of the materials for its manufacture, in the food do not keep pace with each other, sometimes one and sometimes the other being in excess, the liver has a second function. When the food-supply, of whatever kind, is in excess, instead of continuing to produce dextrose the metabolism in the liver takes a slightly differ- ent form and produces the insoluble glycogen, or perhaps the dex- trose of the portal blood is simply converted into glycogen without entering into the structure of the hepatic vrotaplasm. When, on the other hand, the food-supply is deficient, the stored-up glyco- gen is converted into dextrose; whether by some sort of enzyme action or by again serving as food for the hepatic protoplasm is uncertain. Fate of the Dezxtrose of the Blood. The fact that the proportion of dextrose in the blood is approxi- mately constant, notwithstanding the continual supply which is received from the liver, shows that there must be a continual abstrac- tion of dextrose from the blood, which is as continually made good by the activity of the hepatic cells. In fact, the dextrose of the blood appears to play a very prominent part in the animal economy, and the function of the liver in preparing it from other ingredients of the food is a most important one. CoNSUMPTION IN THE MuscLEes.—From the point where it leaves the liver, our knowledge of the metabolism of the dextrose of the blood is scanty, but a large proportion of it undoubtedly takes place in the muscles. It was early shown by Chauveau that the proportion of dextrose in the blood diminishes in its passage through the capillaries of the body, so that the arterial blood con- tains more of this substance than the venous. In conjunction with Kaufmann * he has subsequently shown more specifically that in its passage through the muscular capillaries and through those of the parotid gland the blood is impoverished in dextrose, and to a much greater extent in the active than in the quiescent muscle. Coin- * Comptes rend., 108, 974 and 1057; 104, 1126 and 1352. METABOLISM. 23 cident with this disappearance of dextrose, there is an increase in the carbon dioxide of the blood and a decrease of its oxygen. The relations of the dextrose of the blood to the evolution of heat and work in the muscles and other tissues, so far as they are at present understood, will be considered in a subsequent chapter. For our present purpose it suffices to note the fact that it disappears in the capillaries with the ultimate production of carbon dioxide and water. That the dextrose is immediately oxidized to carbon dioxide and water, however, is extremely unlikely. It has been suggested that the lactic acid which is found in the muscle after muscular contraction is one of the intermediate products of the oxidation. Several considerations, however, seem to render it more probable that the dextrose first enters in some way into the constitution of the muscles, or in other words, that a synthetic or anabolic process precedes the katabolic one. Muscutar Guycocren.—Another fact, of much interest in this connection, is that the muscles (and other tissues also), as well as the liver, contain glycogen. Moreover, the muscular glycogen diminishes or disappears during work and reappears again after rest. It would appear, then, that the muscular tissue shares with the liver the ability to form glycogen. As in the case of the former organ, the simplest supposition is that this glycogen is produced from the dextrose supplied in the blood, and Kiltz * and others have shown that subcutaneous injections of sugar give rise to a formation of muscular glycogen in frogs whose livers have been removed. On the other hand, of course, the considerations pre- sented above relative to the sources of the liver glycogen apply, ceteris paribus, to the formation of glycogen in the muscles. Neither | the source nor the exact functions of the muscular glycogen are yet beyond controversy, but the facts just stated strongly suggest a, storing up of reserve carbohydrates during rest to be drawn upon when there is a sudden demand for rapid metabolism. Fat Propuction.—In addition to its important relation to the muscles, the dextrose of the blood likewise supplies nourishment for the fat tissues of the body. Hitherto we have spoken as if the supply of dextrose to the blood were determined substantially by * Neumeister, Physiologische Chemie, p. 322. 24 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the demands of the general metabolism for material to produce heat and motion. Plainly, however, the capacity of the muscles and the liver to store up carbohydrates is limited, and if the food-supply is permanently greater than the demands of the organism, some other provision must be made for the excess. Under these circum- stances the superfluous dextrose which finds its way into the blood gives rise to a production of fat, which is stored up as a reserve in special tissues and apparently does not enter again into the general metabolism until a permanent deficiericy in the food-supply occurs. The experimental evidence of the production of fat from carbo- hydrates, as well as the quantitative relations of the process so far as they are known, will be considered subsequently. In its relations to the economy of the organism the process is analogous to the formation of glycogen in the liver, except that the storage capacity of the fat tissues is vastly greater, but as compared with the forma- tion of glycogen it is distinctively an anabolic process, the fat molecule being more complex and containing more potential energy than that of dextrose. Hanriot,* assuming the formation of olein, stearin, and palmitin in molecular proportions, represents the process by the equation: 13C,H,,0, = CysHyo,0, + 23CO, + 26H,0. PENTOSE CARBOHYDRATES. The facts of the foregoing paragraphs relate primarily to the hexose carbohydrates, particularly starch and sugar, and to a con- siderable extent to the metabolism of carnivorous animals. The food of herbivora, however, contains a great variety of carbohy- drates and especially considerable quantities of the pentose or five- carbon carbohydrates. That these substances are in part digest- ible, or that at least a considerable proportion of them disappears from the food during its transit through the alimentary canal, was first shown by Stone,+ and has since been fully confirmed by the investigations of Stone & Jones t and of Lindsey & Holland,§ but of their further fate in the body relatively little is known. * Archives de Physiol., 1893, 248. t Agricultural Science, 5, 6. ft Amer. Chem. Jour., 14, 9. § Ibid., 8, 172. METABOLISM. 25 Ebstein,*. who was the first to investigate this subject, showed qualitatively the presence of pentose carbohydrates in the urine of man after the ingestion of arabinose and xylose even in very small doses, and concluded that these sugars are not assimilable. Salkowski } shortly afterward observed the appearance of pen- toses in the urine of rabbits given arabinose after five or six days of fasting. He found in the urine, however, only about one-fifth of the amount ingested, together with small amounts in the blood and larger ones in the muscles, but there was a considerable increase of the glycogen of the liver. From the latter fact Salkowski con- cludes that arabinose may be, either directly or indirectly, a source of glycogen. The glycogen found in his experiment was the ordi- nary six-carbon glycogen. Subsequent investigations by Cremer,{ Munk,§ Frentzel,|| Linde- mann & May,§ Fr. Voit,** Jacksch,t+ Miinch,{{ Salkowski,§§ and others have been directed largely to two questions, viz., whether the pentose carbohydrates are oxidized in the body and whether they serve as a source of glycogen. PENTOSES OXIDIZED IN THE Bopy.—As the general result of these investigations, it may be stated that pentoses (in particular arabinose and xylose), whether administered by the stomach or injected into the blood, are at least partially oxidized in the body. In the human organism the power of oxidizing the pentoses, which do not normally constitute any considerable portion of its food, appears to be quite limited, and even when they are given in small quantities a portion (not all) is excreted in the urine. In the rabbit the pentoses seem to be more vigorously oxidized, only about twenty per cent. being excreted unaltered, even when compara- tively large doses are given. In these experiments the pentose sugars were administered in considerable amounts at once, and the excretion of a portion unal- tered would seem to be a phenomenon similar to the temporary * Virchow’s Archiv, 129, 401; 182, 368. J Arch. klin. Med., 56, 283. +Centralbl. med. Wiss., 1893, p.193. ** Ibid., 68, 524. t Zeit. f. Biol., 29, 536; 42, 428. ++ Zeit. f. Heilk., 20, 195. §Centralbl. med. Wiss., 1894, p. 83. tt Zeit. physiol. Chem., 29, 493. || Arch. ges. Physiol., 56, 273. §§ Ibid., 32, 393. 26 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. glycosuria caused by large doses of the common sugars. The pen- tose carbohydrates in the ordinary food of herbivora, however, are largely or entirely the comparatively insoluble pentosans. As already stated, these bodies are partially digested—that is, they do not reappear in the feces. As to the manner of their digestion we are ignorant. If we are justified in assuming that the digested portion is converted, wholly or partially, into pentoses, then the conditions differ from those of the experiments above mentioned in that the production and assimilation of the pentoses is gradual. Under these circumstances we might be justified in anticipating a more complete oxidation of these bodies. To what extent this is true it is at present impossible to say. Weiske,* in connection with his investigations upon the digestibility of the pentosans, states that the urine of the sheep and rabbits experimented upon gave only a slight reaction for pentoses. The writer has not been able to find any records of other tests of the urine of domestic animals for pentoses. PENTOSES AS A SOURCE OF GLycoGEN.—Most, although not all, investigators have found an increase in the glycogen of the liver consequent upon the ingestion of pentoses, but in every case it has been the ordinary six-carbon glycogen. This has been commonly and most naturally interpreted as showing that the pentoses are not themselves converted into glycogen in the body, but are simply oxidized in-the place of some other material which is the true source of the observed gain of glycogen. In the light of known facts regarding the apparent power of the liver to produce glycogen from very diverse hexoses (see p. 20) it would seem, however, that the possibility of an actual assimilation of the pentoses by the hepatic cells should at least be borne in mind. THE ORGANIC ACIDS. Tn addition to such quantities of the organic acids, free and com- bined, as are contained in their food, relatively large amounts of these substances are, in the case of herbivorous animals and par- ticularly of ruminants, produced by the fermentation of the carbo- hydrates in the alimentary canal. For this reason their meta- * Zeit. physiol. Chem., 20, 489. METABOLISM. 27 bolism may properly be considered in connection with that of the carbohydrates themselves. But little is known of the metabolism of the organic acids, how- ever, beyond the fact that they are oxidized in the body, a portion of the resulting carbon dioxide appearing in the urine, in combina- tion with sodium and potassium, rendering that fluid alkaline. Wilsing * and v. Knieriem + have shown that organic acids such as result from the fermentation of carbohydrates are not found to any appreciable extent in the excreta, while the researches of Munk t and Mallevre,§ which will be considered more particularly in another connection, have shown that the sodium salts of butyric and acetic acids when injected into the blood are promptly oxi- dized, and Nencki & Sieber || have shown that lactic acid is readily oxidized, even by a diabetic patient. NON-NITROGENOUS MATTER OF THE URINE. It has been implied in the foregoing pages that. the digested carbohydrates of the food, whatever the intermediate stages through which they may pass, are ultimately oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Of the ordinary hexose carbohydrates this is doubtless true, but with some of the large variety of substances ordinarily grouped together, by the conventional scheme of feeding-stuffs analy- sis, as “carbohydrates and related bodies,” or as “crude fiber’’ and “nitrogen-free extract,” the case appears to be otherwise. It has been shown that the urine, in addition to the nitrogenous products of proteid metabolism which will be considered in a subsequent section, contains also non-nitrogenous materials, pre- sumably metabolic in their nature. In the urine of man and of the carnivora these non-nitrogenous substances are chiefly or wholly such as might be derived from the metabolism of proteids (phenols and other compounds of the aromatic series), and their amount is comparatively small. In the urine of herbivora, particularly of ruminants, however, their quantity is relatively very considerable, and it seems impossible to regard any large portion of them as derived from the proteid metabolism. * Zeit. f. Biol., 21, 625. t Arch. ges. Physiol., 46, 322; + Ibid., 21, 139. 8 Ibid., 49, 460. || Jour. pr. Chem., N. F., 26, 32. 28 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Henneberg * found that from 26.7 to 30.0 per cent. of the organic matter of sheep urine was neither urea nor hippuric acid, while from 95 to 100 per cent. of the total nitrogen was contained in these two substances. G. Kitihn in his extensive respiration experiments on oxen, as reported by Kellner,+ assuming that all the nitrogen of the urine was in the form either of hippuric acid or urea, found that from 40.05 to 67.64 per cent. of the total carbon of the urine was present in non-nitrogenous substances. The more recent investi- gations of Kellner,} as well as those of Jordan § and of the writer,|| have fully confirmed this fact. Apparently these non-nitrogenous organic substances are de- rived in some way largely from the coarse fodders. Their propor- tion in the urine is relatively large when the ration consists exclu- sively of coarse fodder, and the addition of such fodders to a basal ration causes a marked increase in their amount, while, on the other hand, such concentrated feeding-stuffs as have been inves- tigated do not produce this effect in any very marked degree. Furthermore, their amount seems to bear no fixed relation to the protein of the coarse fodder. When the amount of the latter ingredient is small, the total organic matter of the urine has in some cases exceeded the maximum amount that could have been derived from the protein of the food, thus demonstrating that a portion at least of the non-nitrogenous urinary constituents must have had some other source. As the proportion of protein in the food increases, the amount of nitrogenous products in the urine likewise increases, while that of the non-nitrogenous products appears to be more constant, so that the ratio of urinary nitrogen . to carbon increases. The most plausible explanation of these facts seenis to be that the substances in question are derived from some of the non-nitrogenous ingredients of the coarse fodders, but from what ones, or what is the nature of the products, we are still ignorant.¢ * Neue Beitrage, etc., p. 119, { Landw. Vers. Stat., 44, 348, 404, 474, 529, t Ibid., 47, 275; 50, 245; 53, 1. § New York State Expt. Station, Bull. 197, p. 27. || Penna. Expt. Station, Bull. 42, p. 150. 4] A further discussion of this subject in its relation: s to thi the food will be found in Part II. enone ae METABOLISM. 29 §2. Fat Metabolism. Searcely a tissue or portion of the animal body can be named in which more or less fat is not found. The muscular fibers, the epithelium, the nerves and ganglia, etc., all contain cells in which globules of fat may be recognized, so that the capacity to produce or store up fat seems to be common to almost all the cells of the body. It is particularly in certain cells of the connective tissue, however, that the large accumulations of visible fat in the body take place. At the outset these cells present no special characters, but in a well-nourished animal globules of fat begin to accumulate in them, the cells enlarge, the globules of fat coalesce into larger ones, and finally the cell substance is reduced to a mere envelope, the nucleus being pushed to one side and almost the whole volume. of the cell occupied by fat. Masses of connective tissue thus loaded with fat constitute what is called adipose tissue. Large deposits of adipose tissue are met with surrounding various organs, particu- larly the kidneys, but the largest deposit of fat is usually in the connective tissue underlying the skin. In milk production, too, large amounts of fat appear in the epithelial cells of the milk glands. Fat Manufactured in the Body.—The older physiologists held that all the ingredients of the body pre-existed in the food. Specifi- cally, animal fat was regarded as simply vegetable fat which had escaped oxidation in the body and been deposited in the tissues. But while there is no doubt that the fat of the food can contribute to the fat supply of the body, the food of herbivorous animals usually contains a relatively small quantity of fat and the amount produced by a rapidly fattening animal or by a good dairy cow is usually much greater than that consumed in the food. Deferring to subsequent pages a discussion of the sources of animal fat,* we may content ourselves here with anticipating the general results of the great amount of experimental inquiry which has been expended upon this question. These results may be briefly summarized in the following statements: * For avery complete review of the literature of fat production up to 1894, see Soskin, Journ. f. Landw., 42, 157. 3° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. 1. The animal body produces fat from other ingredients of its food. 2. The carbohydrates and related bodies of the food serve as sources of fat. . , 3. It is probable that the proteids also serve as sources of fat. So far, then, as that portion of the fat which is actually pro- duced in the body from other substances is concerned, we may most readily conceive of its formation as consisting essentially of a manufacture of fat by the protoplasm of the fat cells, which are nourished by the carbohydrates, proteids, and other materials brought to them by the circulation. Functions of the Food Fat.—The fat which is manufactured in the body from other ingredients of the food, however, often con- stitutes the larger portion of the total fat production, while but a relatively small proportion at most can be derived from the fat of the food. The question naturally arises whether this smaller portion contained in the food is simply deposited mechanically, so to speak, in the fat cells, or whether it too, like the carbohydrates and proteids, serves to nourish the fat cells and supply raw material out of which they may manufacture fat. At first thought the former alternative might seem more prob- able. The fat of the food, so far as we are able to trace it, does not undergo any considerable chemical changes, such as the proteids do, e.g., in the process of digestion, but is largely resorbed in the form of apparently unaltered fat. Moreover, resorption of fat takes place largely through the lacteals and the resorbed fat reaches the general circulation without being subjected like the carbohydrates to the action of the liver. Deposition oF Fore1cn Fars.—The view just indicated is supported to a considerable extent by the results of experiments upon the fate of foreign fats introduced into the body. Experiments by Radziejewsky * and Subbotin + were indecisive. but Lebedeff t was later successful in obtaining positive re- sults. Two dogs, after prolonged fasting. received small amounts of almost fat-free meat together with, in the one case, linseed oil, *Virchow’s Archiv., 56, 211; 48, 268. + Zeit. f. Biol.. 6, 73. } Thier. Chem. Ber., 12, 425; Zeit. Physiol. Chem.. 6, 149: Centralb]. med. Wiss., 1882, 129. METABOLISM. 3t and in the other, mutton tallow. After three weeks, during which the animals recovered their original weights, the adipose tissue was found to contain, in the one case, fat fluid at 0° C. and agreeing very closely with linseed oil in its chemical behavior, while in the other case the fat had a melting-point of over 50° C., and was almost identical with mutton fat. On the other hand, the same author in experiments with tributyrine failed to obtain any noteworthy deposition of this substance. Munk * fed large amounts of rape oil to a previously fasted dog for seventeen days and found in the body considerable amounts of fat differing markedly in appearance and properties and in the proportion of olein to solid fats from normal dog fat. He likewise succeeded in isolating from the fat eruic acid, the characteristic ingredient of rape oil. In a second experiment ft the fatty acids prepared from mutton tallow were fed with similar results, the proportion of stearin and palmitin to olein being approximately reversed as compared with normal dog fat. The latter experiment is also of interest as showing that the fatty acids may be synthesized to fat in the body, the change taking place, according to Munk, in the process of resorption. More recently Winternitz { has experimented with the iodine addition products of fats. He observed the retention of a con- siderable proportion of iodine in the body (of hens and dogs) in _ organic form and also found iodine in the fat of the body at the close of the experiment. Similar experiments on a milking goat § showed that at least 6 per cent. of the fat fed passed into the milk. Henriques and Hansen || fed two three-months-old pigs for about nine months with ground barley, to which was added, in one case linseed oil and in the other cocoanut oil, while in the succeeding three months the rations were exchanged. Samples of the sub- cutaneous fat of the back were taken (with the aid of cocaine) at four different times and the fat of the carcasses at the close of the experiment was also examined. The results showed an abundant deposition of the linseed oil (and cocoanut oil?). On the other * Thier. Chem. Ber., 14, 411; Virchow’s Archiv., 95, 407. + Archiv. f. (Anat. u.) Physiol., 1883, p. 273. t Zeit. physiol. Chem , 24, 425. § Thier. Chem. Ber., 27, 293. || Zbid., 29. 68. 32 ; PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. hand, experiments with cows failed to show any passage of linseed oil as such into the milk. Leube * made subcutaneous injections of melted butter on two dogs and found an abundant deposit of butter fat especially under the skin of the abdomen, the Reichert-Meiss] number of the fat being 20.46 in the first case and 15.3 in the second. Rosenfelt + fed fasted dogs with mutton fat and observed a large deposit of this fat in all parts of the body. : INFLUENCE OF FEEDING ON ComPposiITION OF Fat.—In addition to the more purely physiological experiments just cited, there are on record a not inconsiderable number of feeding experiments, especially upon swine, in which the feeding appears to have sensibly influenced the appearance, firmness, melting-point, or composition of the body fat. — While it is not impossible, however, that in some cases the peculiar fats of the food (e.g., the fat of maize or of the oil-meals) may have been deposited in the adipose tissue unchanged, it must be borne in mind that these experiments were made on mixed rations and that undoubtedly there was a considerable production of fat in the body from other ingredients of the food. This being the case, we are left in doubt as to whether the effect observed is due directly to the fat of the food or is to be explained as an effect of the food as a whole, or of some unknown ingredients of it, in modifying the nature of the metabolism in the fat cells. That such an explana-. tion is at least possible would seem to be indicated by the well- established fact that marked changes of food do modify the metabolism in the milk gland sufficiently to materially affect the proportion of volatile fatty acids in butter fat. A striking example of the possibility of such an effect upon the metabolism of the fat cells is afforded by the recent investigations of Shutt { into the causes of “soft” pork. On the average of a con- siderable number of animals, he finds that the shoulder and loin fat of pigs fed exclusively on maize shows a very low melting-point and a high iodine absorption number, indicating a large percentage of olein, and inclines to attribute this effect to the oil of the maize. When, however, he fed skim milk with the maize, he obtained pork * Thier. Chem. Ber., 25, 45. + Ibid., 25, 44, ¢ Canada: Dominion Experiment Station, Bull. 38. METABOLISM. 33 of good quality, the fat having a melting-point and iodine number not widely different from those obtained with the most approved rations. While it is possible that part of this effect was due to a reduced consumption of maize oil, so that more fat was produced from the other ingredients of the food, the conclusion seems justified that the principal factor was the influence of the skim milk upon the nutrition of the fat cells. This influence may with some degree of probability be ascribed to its protein, and it is worthy of notice that in Shutt’s experiments the rations which produced the highest grade of pork were composed of materials rich in protein. Another fact warns us to be cautious in our interpretation of the results of this class of feeding experiments. Such experiments in most cases involve a comparison of the composition of the fat from animals differently fed. Albert * has found that both with swine and sheep the composition of the body fat is subject to very considerable individual variations as to melting-point, refractive index, and iodine number, the differences being, in his experiments, greater than the average differences which could be ascribed to the feeding. Moreover, the fat of the same individual has not the same com- position in different parts of the body. This point has recently been the subject of an elaborate investigation by Henriques & Hansen,t whose results show a higher melting-point and a lower iodine number in the inner as compared with the outer layers of fat. This difference they ascribe to the difference in the tempera- ture of the tissues and support this view by an experiment with three pigs. One animal was kept in a stall heated. to about 30° C. for two months, while the others were exposed to a temperature of 0° C., one unprotected and the other partially enveloped in a sheep- pelt. At the close of the experiment the fat immediately under the skin gave the following figures: Todine Solidifying Number. Point. Kept at 30°-35° C.......-..0-5- 69.4 24.6° C. Kept at 0°, in sheep pelt: Part under the pelt........ 67.0 25.4° C. Part exposed.... ...-...--6 69.4 24.1° C, Kept at 0°, unprotected...... . 72.38 23.3° C, * Landw. Jahrb., 28, 961, 986. + Bied. Centr. Blatt. Ag. Ch., 30, 182. 34 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Towards the interior of the body the differences became grad- ually less. It is evident, then, that the sources of possible error in ex- periments upon the influence of food on the composition of body fat are considerable, and that not only is great care necessary to secure representative samples of fat for examination, but the effect of individuality must be eliminated so far as possible by the use of a considerable number of animals. When we add to this the other fact that the fat production of herbivorous animals is largely at the expense of other nutrients than fat, we shall hardly incline to give the results of such investigations much weight as regards the question of the functions of food fat. QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS.—Some further light upon the point under discussion may perhaps be obtained from a consideration of the quantitative relations of food fat to fat production shown by respiration experiments and which will be considered more fully on subsequent pages (compare Chapter V). In scarcely any of these experiments has the food fat been deposited quantitatively: in the tissue. In three out of five experiments by Rubner in which fat was given to a previously fasting animal, from 65.82 to 91.89 per cent. of the fat supplied in excess of the amount metabolized during fasting was stored up in the body. Similarly, in the ex- periments of Pettenkofer & Voit, in which the fat was added to a ration already more than sufficient for maintenance, on the average 87.86 per cent. of the fat of the food was deposited in the tissues. Kellner,* among his extensive respiration experiments upon cattle, reports the results of three in which peanut oil was added to a basal ration more than sufficient for maintenance. The amounts of fat consumed in excess of the basal ration and the resulting gains by the animals were as follows, the slight variations in the amounts of the other nutrients being neglected: Gain by Animal. Additional Fat “ Gain of Fat Animal. Digested, in Per Cent. of Fat Grams. Protein, Fat, Digested. Grams. Grams. D 677 8 239 35.30 F 542 86 205 37.83 Qa 458 44 279 60.91 * Landw. Vers. Stat., 58, 112, 124, 199, 214. METABOLISM. 35 Computations of the proportion of the energy of the added fat which was recovered in the total gain of flesh and fat (compare Chapter XITI, § 1) showed, according to the method of computa- tion employed, a loss of from 31 to 48 per cent. The comparatively small losses observed in Rubner’s and in Pettenkofer & Voit’s experiments may well be ascribed to a con- sumption of energy in the work of digestion (compare Chapter XJ), but it hardly seems possible to account in this way for the large losses observed by Kellner. Apparently the peanut oil in these experiments, after its digestion and resorption, must have been subjected to extensive molecular changes involving a considerable expenditure of potential energy, and if this be true, the suggestion of an assimilation by the fat cells and a construction of animal fat from the oil is obvious. ConsTANCY OF CoMPosITION OF Fats.—The relatively constant and characteristic composition of the fat of the same species of animal, notwithstanding differences in the food, has been urged in favor of the view that the fat of the animal is a product of the protoplasmic activity of the fat cells. “The fat of a man differs from the fat of a dog, even if both feed on the same food, fatty or otherwise” (M. Foster). The steer produces beef fat and the sheep mutton fat on identical rations. Unless, however, we are prepared to discredit the experimental results above cited, it would appear that this general and approximate uniformity of composition is largely due to a general uniformity of food, and that marked changes in the nature of the latter may result in altering the former. To this must be added, as already insisted upon, the fact that much of the fat found in the body, especially in the herbivora, is undoubtedly produced in the organism. We may fairly presume that this fat will be the characteristic fat of the species. If we may suppose further that a considerable share of the food fat is oxidized directly, and if we take into consideration the general uniformity of diet of our domestic animals and the relatively small total amount of fat which it often contains, we have at least a plausible explanation of the observed facts and one which does not preclude a direct deposi- tion of food fat in the body and a consequent effect upon the com- position of the body fat. The Katabolism of Fat.—The proportion of the food fat which 36 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. serves to increase the store of fat in the body depends largely upon the total food-supply. When the latter is more than sufficient to balance the total metabolism of the organism, the excess may give rise to a storage of fat, and under these circumstances the food fat or a part of it may, as we have seen, contribute to the increase of adipose tissue. On the other hand, when the food-supply is in- sufficient, not only is its fat in common with its other ingredients in effect consumed to support the vital processes, but the fat pre- viously stored in the adipose tissue is drawn upon to make up the deficiency. Under these circumstances the fat disappears more or less rapidly from the fat cells, passing away gradually either into the lymphatics or the blood-vessels in some manner not as yet fully understood. Fat, then, whether derived immediately from the food or drawn in the first instance from the adipose tissue of the body, passes into the circulation and serves to supply the demands of the body for oxidizable material and energy, the final products of its oxida- tion being carbon dioxide and water. Of the intermediate steps in this katabolic process we are comparatively ignorant, but one hypothesis regarding it has acquired so much importance in its bearings on the availability of the potential energy of the food as to require mention here. Formation OF DExTROSE FROM Fat.—This hypothesis is, in brief, that the first step in the katabolism of fat takes place in the liver and consists in its conversion into sugar. In other words, it is held that the fat of the food or that drawn from the adipose tissue of the body supplies the liver with part of the material for its func- tion of sugar production described in the previous section. This hypothesis is advocated especially by those physiologists who, like Seegen in Vienna and Chauveau and his associates in Paris, look upon the carbohydrates, and particularly dextrose, as the im- mediate source of the energy exerted in muscular contraction or in the various other forms of physiological work. The evidence upon which this view is based will be considered in subsequent chapters. For the present it suffices to point out that, if we admit its truth, then the general metabolism of the body is essentially a carbohydrate metabolism. Whether we consider the case of a fasting animal, living upon its store of protein and fat, or that of an METABOLISM. 37 animal receiving food, the liver breaks down the proteids and fat supplied to the blood either by the food or from the tissues, pro- ducing dextrose. This dextrose, like that derived from the carbo- hydrates of the food, is then, as indicated in the previous section, oxidized in the tissues either directly or with previous conversion into glycogen. As regards the katabolism of fat, in particular, Nasse * has brought forward reasons for believing that the liver is concerned in it. Seegen + submitted fat to the action of finely chopped, freshly excised liver suspended in defibrinated blood at a temperature of 35—40° C., in a current of air and observed a considerable formation of sugar in five to six hours as compared with a control experiment without the fat. He likewise found { in experiments upon dogs fed on fat with little or no meat that the blood of the hepatic vein was much richer in sugar than that of the portal vein. On the basis of the probable amount of blood circulating through the liver, he computes that the total amount of sugar thus produced was much greater than could have been supplied by the glycogen stored in the liver and the amount of proteids metabolized (as measured by the urinary nitrogen), and hence concludes that at least the difference was produced from fat. As was pointed out in the preceding section, however, many physiologists regard the large differences between the dextrose content of the portal and the hepatic blood observed by Seegen as being in large part the result of the necessary operation and thus abnormal, and the production of glycogen or dextrose from fat is not regarded as proven by the majority of physiologists.§ Thus Girard || and Panormow 4 found the post-mortem formation of sugar in the liver to be strictly pro- portional to the disappearance of glycogen, and similar results were obtained by Cavazzani and Butte.** Kaufmann,tt{ who has developed this hypothesis in considerable * y. Noorden, Pathologie des Stoffwechsels, p. 85. + Die Zuckerbildung im Thierkérper, p. 151. t Ibid., p. 171. § Cf. Neumeister, Physiologische Chemie, p. 368. ]] Arch. ges. Physiol., 41, 294. { Thier. Chem. Ber., 17. 304. ** Ibid., 24, 391 and 394. ++ Archives de Physiol., 1896, p. 331. 38 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. detail, represents the two supposed stages in the katabolism of fat by the two following equations, proposed by Chauveau:* First Stage: 2(C,H,,,0,) +670, = 16(C,H,,0,) + 18CO,+ 14H,0. Second Stage: 16(C,H,,0,) +960,=96CO,+96H,O. Even, however, if we admit the formation of dextrose from fat in the body, it may fairly be doubted whether the process is as ‘simple as these equations, even if regarded as simply schematic, would imply. § 3. Proteid Metabolism. ANABOLISM. Digestive Cleavage.—The digestion of the proteids is essen- tially a process of cleavage and hydration under the influence of certain enzyms. By this process the complex proteid molecules are partially broken up into simpler ones. By the action of pepsin in acid solution we obtain albumoses and peptones, while the trypsin of the pancreatic juice, at least outside the body, carries the cleavage still further, producing crystalline nitrogenous bodies of comparatively simple constitution. Opinions are still more or less divided as to how far these processes of cleavage and hydration are carried in the actual process of digestion, where the products of the action are constantly being resorbed, but there are not wanting in- dications that it is both less extensive and less rapid than in arti- ficial digestion. It likewise seems to have been demonstrated that some soluble proteids are capable of direct resorption without change, while others are not and some, notably casein, are promptly coagulated by the rennet ferment, apparently expressly in order Ahat they may be subjected to the action of the digestive ferments. In a general way, the statement appears to be justified that the larger share‘of the proteid material of the food is resorbed as albumoses and peptones. > PURPOSE OF THE CLEAVAGE.—The fact just mentioned that, on the one hand, some soluble proteids appear capable of direct re- sorption, while, on the other hand, some, like casein, are at once rendered insoluble as the first step in digestion, plainly necessitates a material modification of the old view that the object of the cleav- * La Vie et l’Energie chez 1 Animale. METABOLISM. 39 age and hydration of the proteids in digestion is to render them soluble. Undoubtedly this is an important function of the digestive fluids, but the fundamental object lies deeper and is found in the constitution of the proteids themselves. Nature of the Proteids—While we are still very far removed from any adequate knowledge of the molecular structure of the proteids, a study of the action upon them of various hydrolytic agents, and particularly of the proteolytic enzyms of the digestive fluids, has shown that they undergo cleavage along certain definite lines, giving rise to two series of products known as the hemi- and the anti-series. The primary products are the proteoses, or albu- moses (hemi and anti). By further action of the ferment these give rise to the secondary or deutero-proteoses, and these in turn to peptones, while the peptones of the hemi-series, by ‘tthe further action of trypsin, are broken up, as noted, into simpler bodies such as aspartic acid, glutaminic acid, and notably tyrosin and leucin. The two latter bodies belong to the aromatic series and contain the phenyl radicle, which is thus shown to be present in the bodies of the hemi group, while it is absent from the anti group. Without pursuing the subject further, enough has been said to show that the general result of the digestive proteolysis is to break up the pro- teid molecule into a considerable number of unlike fragments.* Differences in Proteids—Turning now to another phase of the subject, it is a familiar fact that the numerous proteids which have been studied differ quite markedly from each other in properties and in composition. To instance but a single characteristic differ- ence, the investigations of Osborne and his associates at the Connec- ticut Agricultural Experiment Station have shown in detail what was to a certain extent known before, viz., that the nitrogen con- tent of the vegetable proteids is notably higher than that of the _ animal proteids. We can only interpret these differences in com- position and properties as the results of differences in molecular structure. We may fairly suppose that these differences in struc- ture are brought about, in part at least, by differences in the relative proportions in the proteid molecule of the several molecular group- ings whose presence is indicated to us by the results of proteolysis. *For a full treatment of the subject, compare Chittenden, Digestive Pro- teolysis, 1894. 40 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Food Proteids and Body Proteids.—What is especially to be noted in this connection is that the food proteids are not identical with the body proteids. This is especially true of the vegetable proteids in the food of the herbivora, and of the casein of milk, but is measurably true in all cases. A simple resorption of unaltered protein, therefore, would not serve the purposes of the organism. The jood proteids must be changed to body proteids. This means, however, that the proportions of those molecular groupings which have just been spoken of must be changed—that is, the molecules of the food proteid must be so far broken down into their constituent molecular groupings as to permit of a rearrangement and repropor- tioning of the latter into molecules of body proteid. Such a partial breaking down of proteid material takes place in digestion, and indeed, as has been indicated above, it is the study of digestive proteolysis which has given us our general conception of the structure of the proteid molecule. The products of proteid digestion, then, as they are presented to the resorbent organs of the digestive tract, are no longer proteids, but the constituent molecular groupings out of which body proteids may be built up. Rebuilding of Proteids.—But while the proteids of the food are resorbed in the form of cleavage products, apparently largely as pep- tones, no trace of these bodies is found in the blood or in the lymph, nor even in the walls of the digestive canal. Still further, peptones when injected into the blood are treated by the organism as foreign substances and excreted as rapidly as possible, while if added in any considerable amount they act as poisons. The reconstruction of the proteid molecule from the fragments produced by the digestive process has been thought to take place in the epithelial cells of the intestines, the first product being probably serum albumen, so that we may say that the first step in proteid metabolism is anabolic. Recently, however, Okunew, working in Danilewsky’s labora- tory, has announced the discovery that the enzym of rennet (chy- mosin) has the power of synthesizing peptones to proteids, and Sawjalow * has published further studies on the same subject. The latter investigator finds the product to be a gelatinizing pro- teid which is identical whatever the original source of the peptones and which he calls plastein. He considers that this plastein is * Arch, ges. Physiol., 85, 171. METABOLISM. 41 formed in the digestive canal and is the form in which the proteids of the food are resorbed, and points out that this hypothesis accounts for the hitherto puzzling fact of the occurrence of the milk-curdling ferment in animals, such as birds, fishes, and amphibia, which never consume milk. In further support of this view, Winogradow * finds the formation of chymosin in the stomach to be most active at the height of the digestive process, when peptones are being formed most freely. The proteid or proteids first formed from the albumoses and peptones, whether in the epithelial cells or by the action of chymosin, is subject to still further changes in other portions of the body, inasmuch as all the various nitrogenous tissues of the body are formed from it. Some of these changes may be slight, but others, as, e.g., the formation of the collagens, must be profound, while the formation of the compound proteids like hemoglobin, mucin, the nucleins, etc., is clearly synthetic and anabolic. As to where and how these changes and syntheses take place, we are largely ignorant. We simply know the general fact that the food proteids are first partially broken down in the process of digestion and then that the fragments are built up again into body proteids; first, probably, into some single form and later into still more com- plex bodies in the various tissues. KATABOLISM. Final Products.—The anabolic processes which have just been indicated might be characterized in general terms as a preparation of the food proteids for their diverse functions in the body. In the performance of those functions they, like all the organic ingredients of the body, undergo katabolic changes, liberating the energy which was originally contained in them or which may have been tem- porarily added in the preliminary anabolic changes. We have every reason to believe that the katabolisth of proteids is a gradual process, passing through many intermediate stages, but we have very little actual knowledge of the steps which intervene between the proteids and bodies which are either excretory products themselves or closely related to them. Such information as has * Arch. ges. Physiol., 87, 170. 42 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. thus far been acquired upon this subject has resulted chiefly from attempts to trace back the excretory products to their antecedents. The products of the complete breaking down and oxidation of proteids in the body are carbon dioxide and water, excreted through the lungs, skin, and kidneys, and urea and a number of other com- paratively simple crystalline nitrogenous compounds found in the urine. To these are to be added the nitrogenous metabolic prod- ucts of the feces, the sulphuric and phosphoric acids resulting from the oxidation of the sulphur of the proteids and the phosphorus of the nucleo-proteids, and the relatively minute amounts of nitroge- nous matter found in the perspiration. ExcrETION OF FREE NitrocEen.—The question whether any portion of the nitrogen of the proteids is excreted as free gaseous nitrogen is one which has been the subject of no-little investigation and controversy in the past, the especial champions being, on the affirmative, Seegen in Vienna and, on the negative, Voit in Munich. It would lead us too far aside from our present purpose, however, to attempt even to outline the evidence, and it must suffice to say that the great majority of physiologists regard it as established that there is no excretion of gaseous nitrogen as a result of the katabolism of proteids, but that all the proteid nitrogen is excreted in the urine and feces with the exception of small amounts in the perspiration. In accordance with this view, we shall assume in subsequent pages that the urinary nitrogen (together with, strictly speaking, the metabolic nitrogen of the feces and perspiration) furnishes a meas- ure of the total proteid katabolism of the body. A brief consideration of some of the principal nitrogenous products of proteid katabolism will serve to indicate some of the main features of the process, so far as they have been made out. Urea.—Urea, or dicarbamid, CON,H,, is the chief nitrogenous product of proteid metabolism in the carnivora and omnivora. In the urine of man, e.g., from 82 to 86 per cent. of the nitrogen is in the form of urea.* Antecedents of Urea.—A vast amount of study has been expended upon this question without as yet leading to any general unanimity of views. It appears, however, to be fairly well made out that at *v. Noorden, Pathologie des Stoffwechsels, p. 45. METABOLISM. 43° least a considerable part if not all of the urea is formed in the liver, and that its immediate antecedent is ammonium carbonate, to which it is closely related chemically. This theory of Schmiede- berg’s is supported by the facts: Ist. That ammonium salts, and also the amid radicle NH, in the amido acids of the fatty series, when administered in the food are converted into urea. 2d. That ammonium carbonate or formiate injected into the portal vein is converted in the liver mto urea which appears in the blood of the hepatic vein. 3d. That the administration of inorganic acids to the dog and to man results in the excretion of ammonium salts in the urine, it being supposed that the acid displaces the weaker carbonic acid and that the resulting ammonium salt is incapable of conversion into urea in the liver. 4th. Severe disease of the liver has been observed to result in a decreased production of urea and an excretion of ammonium salts in the urine. Later investigations by Minkowski * and others have followed the process of the formation of urea one step further back and ren- dered it highly probable that the ammonium salts out of which urea is formed reach the liver in the form of ammonium lactate. It has been shown that sarcolactic acid is one of the products of the meta- bolism of the muscles. It would appear that this acid unites with . the ammonium radicle derived from the proteids to form ammonium lactate, and that the latter on reaching the liver is first oxidized to the carbonate, which is then converted into urea. If, by disease or surgical interference, this action of the liver is prevented, ammo- nium lactate appears in the urine, and the same effect may even be produced by excessive stimulation of the proteid metabolism, so that the production of ammonium lactate exceeds the capacity of the liver to convert it. ; Uric Actp.—Uric acid is contained in small amounts in the urine of mammals. With birds it constitutes the chief nitrogenous product of the proteid metabolism. Of its antecedents in the organism scarcely anything is known. One theory regards it as a specific product of the metabolism of the nucleins, but this cannot *Cf. Neumeister, Physiologische Chemie, pp. 313-318. 44 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. be regarded as established, and appears difficult to reconcile with its relation to the proteid metabolism of birds. Others regard it as an intermediate product in the production of urea, a small portion of which escapes further oxidation by being excreted by the kidneys. Hippuric Actp.—This substance is a normal ingredient of the urine of mammals, but in that of man and the carnivora is found in but very small amounts. In the urine of herbivora, on the other hand, it occurs abundantly. Light was thrown upon its origin by the well-known discovery by Wohler, in 1824, that it is also found in large amount in the urine of man or of carnivora after the administration of benzoic acid. Chemically, hippuric acid is benzamido-acetic acid, or benzoyl glycocol. When the food contains benzoic acid the latter unites with glycocol resulting from the metabolism of the proteids and forms hippuric acid, while otherwise the glycocol would be further oxidized to simpler nitrogenous products. The synthesis of hip- puric acid has been shown to occur only in the kidneys in the dog, but in the case of the rabbit and frog they appear to share this capacity with other organs. In this action of benzoic acid we have the most familiar demon- stration of the formation of metabolic products intermediate be- tween the proteids and the comparatively simple nitrogenous sub- stances found in the urine. Glycocol has never been detected in the ‘body, obviously because as fast as it is formed it is again decom- posed. Benzoic acid reveals its presence by seizing upon it and converting it into a compound which is incapable of further oxida- tion, and is therefore excreted. Other less familiar examples of the same fact might be cited did space permit. The normal presence of small quantities of hippuric acid in the urine, even when no benzoic acid is contained in the food, arises from the fact that the putrefaction of the proteids in the intestines yields aromatic compounds, containing the benzoyl radicle, which are resorbed and combine with glycocol to form hippuric acid. The origin of the large quantities of hippuric acid ordinarily ex- creted by herbivora, however, or rather of its benzoyl radicle, is still more or less of a puzzle, notwithstanding the consider- ‘able amount of investigation which has been devoted to its study. The most natural supposition would be that the food of METABOLISM. 45 these animals contains substances of the aromatic series capable of yielding benzoic acid or its equivalent in the body, but in none of the feeding-stuffs known to be efficient in causing an excretion of hippuric acid have such compounds been discovered in quantity even remotely sufficient to account for the hippuric acid produced. On the other hand, the hypothesis that the benzoyl radicle of the hippuric acid is derived to any large extent from the proteids of the food appears to be decisively negatived by several facts: First, the quantity of proteids in the ordinary rations of herbivora is relatively small, and even if it all underwent putrefaction the amount of aromatic products which could be formed, on any reason- able estimate, would account for only a small fraction of the hip- puric acid actually found.* Second, in several instances it has been observed that variations in the extent of the putrefactive processes in the intestines, as measured by the amount of con- jugated sulphuric acid in the urine (compare p. 46), bore no rela- tion to the variations in the production of hippuric acid. Third, the addition of pure proteids or of foods very rich in proteids to a ration does not increase the production of hippuric acid, and in at least one case { was found to diminish it and even stop it alto- gether. Apparently we must regard the onantioenous ingredients of feeding-stuffs as the chief source of hippuric acid formation, but be- yond this our knowledge is rather vague. It is well established that the coarse fodders are the chief producers of hippuric acid, while the concentrated feeding-stuffs give rise to little or none, and may even reduce the amount previously produced on coarse fodder, as may also starch. Among the coarse fodders, the graminee give rise to a markedly greater production of hippuric acid than the . leguminose. This effect of the coarse fodders naturally led to ‘the suspicion that the crude fiber contained in them in large amounts might be the source of the hippuric acid, and in fact numerous experiments seem to show that some relation exists between the two, although the results of various investigators are far from con- cordant. ‘Finally, the investigations of Goetze & Pfeiffer, { and of * Compare Salkowski, Zeit. physiol. Chem., 9, 234. + Henneberg and Pfeiffer, Jour. f. Landw., 38, 239. t Landw. Vers. Stat., 47, 59. 46 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Pfeiffer & Eber,* have shown with a high degree of probability that the pentoge carbohydrates of the feed have some connection with the production of hippuric acid. The former investigators observed a marked increase in the production of hippuric acid by a sheep after the administration of cherry gum (impure araban) and of arabinose, and the latter obtained the same effect, although in a less marked degree, by feeding cherry gum to a horse. They also call attention to the differences in the behavior of the pentose carbo- hydrates in the organism of the herbivora and in that of man and the carnivora, but do not attempt to give a final solution of the problem of the origin of the hippuric acid in the former case, while they freely admit that it is difficult, if not impossible, to explain some of the facts already on record on the hypothesis that the pen- toses are the chief source of hippuric acid. CREATIN AND CREATININ.—Among other nitrogenous constit- uents of the urine of man and the carnivora may be mentioned creatinin. This body is the anhydride of creatin, and the two together constitute the principal part of the so-called flesh bases which are contained in considerable quantity in muscular tissue. When meat is consumed, its creatin is converted into creatinin and excreted quantitatively in the urine, the creatinin content of which may be thus considerably increased. As to the physiological signifi- cance of the creatin of muscular tissue opinions are divided, but good authorities are inclined to regard it as an intermediate product of the metabolism of the proteids which is ultimately con- verted into urea, and to urge that the fate of creatin taken into the -stomach is not necessarily the same as that of the creatin produced in the muscles. Aromatic Compounps.—Besides the benzol radicle of hippuric acid, small amounts of other aromatic compounds are also found in the urine. These bodies, belonging chiefly to the phenol and indol groups, owe their origin exclusively to the putrefactive processes already mentioned as taking place in the intestines, and are found in the urine almost entirely in combination with sulphuric acid as the so-called conjugated sulphuric acids, so that the amount of the latter is employed as a measure of the extent of these putrefactive processes, * Landw. Vers. Stat., 49, 97. METABOLISM. 47 MEtTaABotic Propucts In Fecres.—As already stated in Chapter I, the feces contain, in addition to undigested residues of the food, certain materials derived from the body of the animal. This fact was early recognized as true of both carnivora* and herbivora.t Of more recent investigations may be noted especially those of Miiller,{ Rieder,§ and Tsuboi || on carnivora, those of Prausnitz and his associates on man, and those of Kellner,** Stutzer,}f Pfeiffer, {tt and Jordan §§ on herbivora. These “metabolic products” appear to consist of unresorbed or altered residues of the digestive fluids and of mucus and other materials excreted or otherwise thrown off by the walls of the intes- tines. Their production goes on even when the digestive tract is void of food, producing the so-called fasting feces which constitute a true excretory product. The consumption of highly digestible food—e.g., lean meat—does not seem to materially increase their amount, but when food containing indigestible matter is eaten it is believed that they increase in quantity. , It is presumed that these substances are largely nitrogenous in character, and it is known at any rate that not inconsiderable amounts of nitrogen may leave the body by this channel. In other words, these nitrogenous substances, derived from the proteids of the body, instead of undergoing complete conversion into the ordinary crystalline products have their katabolism interrupted as it were at an intermediate stage. Many attempts have .been made to determine the amount of these metabolic products, or of their nitrogen, in the feces, but -without much success, and it may fairly be said that at present we have no method which can be depended upon to distinguish sharply between the nitrogen of undigested-food residues and that of metabolic products. * Bischoff and Voit, Die Ernaéhrung des Fleischfressers, p. 291. + Henneberg, Beitriige, etc., 1864, p. 7. { Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 327. § Ibid., 20, 378. || Ibid., 35, 68. { Ibid., 35, 287; 39, 277; 42, 377. ** Landw. Vers. Stat., 24, 434; Bied. Centralbl., 9, 763. ++ Zeit. physiol. Chem., 9, 211. tt Jour. f. Landw., 31, 221; 38, 149; Zeit. physiol. Chem., 10, 561. §§ Maine Expt. Station Rep., 1888, p. 196. 48 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. NITROGEN IN PERSPIRATION.—The perspiration of such animals as secrete this fluid must be regarded as one of the minor channels by which nitrogen is excreted. In human perspiration there have been found, in addition to small amounts of proteids, urea, uric acid, creatinin, and other nitrogenous products of the proteid meta- bolism. In a recent investigation, Camerer * found about 34 per cent. of the total nitrogen of human perspiration to be in the form of urea, about 7.5 per cent. existed as ammonium salts, and the remainder in undetermined forms, including uric acid and traces of albumen. The total quantity of nitrogen excreted in the insensible perspi- ration appears to be insignificant. Atwater & Benedict + found it to amount to 0.048 gram per day for an adult man in a state of rest. Rubner & Heubner { obtained from the clothing of an infant 2.83 mgrs. of ammonia and 0.0205 mgr. of urea per day and estimated the total nitrogen of the perspiration at 39 mers. - When the secretion of sweat is stimulated by work or a high external temperature the amount of nitrogen excreted may be con- siderably increased as compared with a state of rest, although its absolute amount is still small. Atwater & Benedict,§ in a work ex- periment, observed an excretion of 0.220 gram of nitrogen per day in the perspiration of man. The Non-nitrogenous Residue of the Proteids.—The various nitrogenous products found in the urine and other excreta, the most important of which have been noticed above, are believed to con- tain all the nitrogen of the metabolized proteids. This does not imply, however, that a quantity of proteids equivalent to this nitro- gen, or even to that of the urine, has been completely oxidized to the final products of metabolism, viz., carbon dioxide, water, and urea and its congeners. A comparison of the ultimate composition of the proteids with that of the nitrogenous products of their metabolism reveals the fact that an amount of the latter sufficient to account for all the nitrogen of the proteids contain but a relatively small part of their carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Taking urea as the chief and * Zeit. f. Biol., 41, 271. +U. 8S. Dept. Agr., Office of Expt. Stations, Bull. 69, 73. {Zeit. f. Biol., 86, 34. § Loe. cit., p. 53. METABOLISM. 49 typical metabolic product, and using average figures for the com- position of animal proteids, we have, omitting the sulphur of the proteids, the following: Proteids. Urea. Residue. CarbOn eccccrcietewcrceat 53.0 6.86 46.14 Hydrogen ............ 7.0 2.29 4.71 Oxygen ............. 24.0 9.14 14.86 Nitrogen ............ 16.0 16.00 100.0 34.29 65.71 After abstracting the elements of urea, we have left considerably over half the hydrogen and oxygen of the proteid and the larger part of its carbon. A substantially similar result is reached in case of the other nitrogenous metabolic products. The splitting off of these products from the proteids leaves a non-nitrogenous residue. Fate or THE Non-nrrrocenous Resipur.—The foregoing statements and comparison must not be understood to mean that the proteids split up in the body into two parts, viz., urea, etc., on the one hand, and an unknown non-nitrogenous substance or sub- stances on the other. As we have already seen, the processes of proteid metabolism are far more complicated than such a simple cleavage. Neither are we to assume that any substance or group of substances corresponding in composition to the “residue” of the above computation exists. The figures mean simply that while the nitrogenous bodies of the urine contain all the nitrogen of the proteids they do not account for all of the other elements, but that part of the latter must be sought elsewhere. Ultimately, of course, the elements of this non-nitrogenous residue are converted into carbon dioxide and water. The conver- sion into these final products, however, is necessarily a process of oxidation, presumably yielding energy to the organism. It is a matter of some interest, then, to trace the steps of the transforma- tion so far as this is at present possible. a Fe Formation of Sugar.—In discussing the functions of the liver in § 1 of this chapter, we have seen reason to believe that this organ continues to produce sugar when the diet consists largely or exclu- sively of proteids. In this case we are forced to the conclusion that this sugar is manufactured from the elements of the non-nitrogenous residue. 5° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. This conclusion, based on what appears to be the normal func- tion of the liver, is further strengthened by a large number of ex- periments and observations upon the metabolism in diabetes. This disease, whether arising spontaneously or provoked artificially, is characterized by the presence of large amounts of sugar in the urine. It has been shown that this production of sugar continues when all carbohydrates are withdrawn from the diet, and further- more, that the amount of sugar excreted bears a quite constant relation to the amount of proteids metabolized, thus clearly in- ‘dicating the latter as the source of the sugar. It is true that the formation of sugar from proteids is denied by some physiologists,* but by the majority it seems to be accepted as a well-established fact that sugar is one of the intermediate products of proteid metabolism. Of the steps of the process, as wellas of its quantitative rela- tions, we are ignorant. In effect, it is a process of oxidation and hydration, since a residue of the composition computed above would require the addition of both hydrogen and oxygen to con- vert it into sugar, but that it is as simple a process as this state- ment would make it appear, or that the conversion is a quantitative one, may well be doubted. In conclusion it may be stated that while recent investigations have shown the presence of a carbohydrate radicle in numerous (although by no means all) proteids, it does not appear that this fact stands in any direct relation to the physiological production of sugar from these substances. In the first place, the carbohydrate radicle constitutes a much smaller proportion of these proteids than corresponds to the amount of sugar which they are apparently: capable of yielding in the body, and in the second place it appears to be a well-established (although not undisputed) fact that the organism can produce sugar from proteids which do not contain the carbohydrate radicle. Formation of Fat—Whether fat is formed from the elements of proteids in the animal body is at present a subject of controversy, but this question will be more profitably considered in a subsequent chapter. It is sufficient to remark here that while much of the earlier evidence bearing upon this point has been shown to be *Cf. Schéndorf, Arch. ges. Physiol., 82, 60. METABOLISM. 51 . inconclusive, the formation of fat from proteids has not yet been disproved and has weighty direct evidence in its favor, while the facts that sugar may be formed from proteids, and that carbohy- drates are certainly a source of fat to the animal organism are strong additional arguments in favor of its possibility. Schematic Equations—Chauveau and his assocjates* whose views regarding the functions of the carbohydrates in the body have already been mentioned, regard the katabolism of the proteids as taking place in three stages. The first consists of the splitting off of urea with production of carbon dioxide, water, and fat, accord- ing to the equation: 4(CrHys2N 13025) + 1390, (Stearin) =2(CygH,, 0.) + 36CON,H, + 138CO,-+ 42H,0 +28,. The resulting fat is then, according to Chauveau, further oxi- dized in the liver, yielding dextrose, in accordance with the equation already given on p. 38, viz., 2571 9p +670, = 16C,H,,0, + 18CO,+ 14H,0, and the dextrose is finally oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Another equation representing the katabolism of proteids is that proposed by Gautier, which regards the first step in the process as a combined hydration and cleavage with the production of urea, fat, dextrose, and carbon dioxide, as follows: 2(C2H2N1g028) + 28H,0 ara = 18CON,H, + 2C;,H)g0.+ CsH1.0,+ 18CO,+ §,. It may be assumed that these authors regard the above equa- tions simply as schematic representations of the general course of proteid metabolism and do not intend to imply that there are no intermediate stages in the process. Interpreting them in this sense, we have good reasons for believing that the facts which they represent are qualitatively true. A chemical equation, however, expresses not merely qualitative but quantitative results. If the above equations have any significance beyond that of the mere verbal statement that fat and sugar are products of proteid meta- *(Cf. Kaufmann, Archives de Physiol., 1896, p. 341. 52 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. bolism, they mean that from 100 grams of proteids there is pro- duced, according to the first scheme, 27.61 grams of fat, and that from this, by the addition of oxygen, 44.67 grams of sugar are formed. Some of the evidence by which- these equations are sup- ported will be considered in another connection, but may be antici- pated here in the statement that, in the judgment of the writer, it is far from sufficient to establish them as quantitative statements. THE NON-PROTEIDS. Under this comprehensive but somewhat vague term have been grouped all those numerous nitrogenous constituents of the food which are not proteid in their nature, the name being a contraction of non-proteid nitrogenous substances. It includes the extractives of meat, and in vegetable foods several groups of substances, of which, however, the amides and amido-acids are most abundant. Various substances of this class are produced by the splitting up of the reserve proteids in the germination of seeds and apparently also to some extent in the translocation of proteids in the growing plant, while some at least of them appear to be produced syntheti- cally from inorganic materials and to be the forerunners of pro- teids. In young plants a considerable proportion of the so-called crude protein (N X 6.25) often consists of these non-proteids, and considerable interest, therefore, attaches to their transformations in the body. AMIDES OXIDIZED IN THE Bopy.—It has been shown by numer- ous investigators that various amides and amido-acids when added to the food are oxidized, giving rise to a production of urea. Shultzen & Nencki* found that glycocol, leucin, and tyrosin were thus oxidized, while acetamid apparently was not.’ So far as glycocol is concerned, this result is what would have been expected, since, as we have seen (p. 44), this body appears to be normally formed in the body as an intermediate product of proteid meta- bolism. Similar results were obtained by v. Knieriem + from trials with asparagin, aspartic acid, glycocol, and leucin. Munk t likewise found that the ingestion of asparagin increased the pro- * Zeit. f. Biol. 8, 124. + Ibid. 10,277; _, 36. } Virchow’s Archiv. f. path. Anat., 94, 441. METABOLISM. 53 duction of urea in the dog, all the nitrogen of the asparagin together with an excess over that previously found in the urine being ex- creted. The sulphur in the urine also increased. Hagemann * has more recently fully confirmed this result. Salkowski + found that glycocol, sarkosin, and alanin were oxidized to urea and caused no gain of proteids. Apparently, then, this class of bodies, like ammonia, furnish material out of which the organism can con- struct urea. ; Can Amipes RepLacr Prorerps?—Since the amides yield the same end products of metabolism as the proteids, it is natural to inquire whether they can perform any of the functions of those substances. Amides not Synthesized to Proteids—We have already seen that the albumoses and peptones resulting from the cleavage of the proteids during digestion are built up again into proteids in the process of resorption. The amides commonly found in vegetable feeding-stuffs are likewise simpler cleavage products of the proteids, and some of them are also formed in digestion by the proteolytic action of trypsin. Can proteids be regenerated from these simpler cleavage products? If this is the case, then it should be possible, under suitable con- ditions, to cause a gain of proteids, or at least to maintain the stock of proteids in the tissues, on a food free from proteids but containing amides. Up to the present time, however, all attempts’ of this sort have failed. With the most abundant supply of non- - nitrogenous nutrients and ash, the animals perished when supplied with amides (asparagin) but not with proteids.{ What has thus been found to be true of asparagin we may regard as probably true of other amides and say that there is no evidence that the animal body can build proteids from amides. Partial Replacement of Proteids.—But even if the amides can- not serve as a source of proteids to the animal, it seems not impos- sible that they may by their oxidation perform a part of the func- tions of the proteids, thus protecting a portion of the latter from oxidation and rendering it available for tissue production. *Landw. Jahrb., 20, 264. + Zeit. physiol. Chem., 4, 55. {Compare Politis, Zeit. f. Biol., 28, 492, and Gabriel, Ib., 29, 115. 54 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The earliest investigations upon this point are those of Weiske * and his associates upon the nutritive value of asparagin. The , experiments were made upon rabbits, hens, geese, sheep, and goats, and in the case of the two latter species included experiments on milk production. While the experiments are open to criticism in some respects, as a whole they seemed to show that asparagin, especially when added to a ration poor in proteids, caused a gain of proteids by the body. Weiske accordingly concluded that aspara- gin, while not capable of conversion into proteids, was capable of partially performing their functions and thus acting indirectly as a source of proteids, and this view has been somewhat generally accepted. Subsequent experiments by Bahlmann,t Schrodt,t Potthast,§ Meyer,|| and Chomsky § upon milch-cows, rabbits, and sheep gave results which tended to confirm Weiske’s conclusions. Not all of Weiske’s experiments, however, gave positive results in favor of asparagin, and experiments upon carnivorous and omniv- orous animals have failed to show any such effect. In addition to the experiments of Politis and of Gabriel, referred to above, Mauthner,** Munk,}}+ and Hagemann {{ have failed to observe any gain of proteids by the body as a result of the ingestion of asparagin, but found simply an increase in the apparent proteid metabolism as measured by the urinary nitrogen. Influence on Digestion.—It can hardly be assumed that the actual processes of metabolism in the body tissues are fundamen- tally different in different species of mammals, and investigators have therefore been led to seek an explanation of the striking differ-. ence in the effects of asparagin on herbivora and carnivora in the differences in the digestive processes of the two classes of animals. Digestion in herbivora is a relatively slow process and, as pointed out in Chapter I, is accompanied by extensive fermentations par- * Zeit. f. Biol., 15, 261: 17, 415; 30, 254. {Reported by Zuntz, Arch. f. (Anat. u.) Physiol., 1882, 424, tJahresb. Agr. Chem., 26, 426. § Arch. ges. Physiol., 82, 288. || Cf. Kellner, Zeit. f. Biol., 89, 324. { Ber. physiol. Lab. Landw. Inst. Halle, 1898, Heft 13, p. 1. ** Zeit. f. Biol., 28, 507. tt Virchow’s Arch. f. path. Anat., 94, 441. tt} Landw. Jahrb., 20, 264. ‘METABOLISM. 55 ticularly of the carbohydrates of the food, as is shown by the large amounts of gaseous hydrocarbons produced by these animals. In carnivora, on the contrary, digestion is relatively rapid and the dog, as a representative of this class, excretes, according to Voit & Pettenkofer,* but traces of hydrocarbons, and according to Tap- peiner,} none. Zuntz { has therefore suggested that soluble amides introduced into the digestive canal of herbivora may be used as nitrogenous food by the micro-organisms there present in preference to the less soluble proteids, so that the latter are to a certain extent protected, and that it is even possible that the amides are synthesized to proteids by the organisms. Hagemann § has added the suggestion that the proteids possibly thus formed may be digested in another part of the alimentary canal and thus actually increase the pro- teid supply of the body. If this explanation is, correct, we should expect the effect of asparagin to be more marked when the proportion of proteids in the food is small, and precisely this appears to be the case. In Weiske’s first experiments, which gave the most decided results, the nutritive ratio of the ration without asparagin was 1:19-20, while a later experiment with a nutritive ratio of 1:9.4 showed no effect of the asparagin upon the gain of protein. Chomsky’s results, too, were obtained with rations poor in protein and rich in carbo- hydrates. Later experiments on lambs by Kellner || have fully confirmed this anticipation. In his first experiment two yearling lambs were fed with a mixture of hay, starch, and cane-sugar, having a nutri- tive ratio of 1:28, until nitrogen equilibrium was reached, when ~ fifty grams of the starch was replaced by asparagin. The result was a gain of protein by both animals as compared with a loss in the first period. In the third experiment asparagin was substi- tuted for starch in a ration having a nutritive ratio of 1:7.9, and caused with one animal a slight gain and with the other a slight loss of protein. In the fourth experiment it was added to a ration * Zeit. f. Biol., 7, 433; 9, 2 and 438. t Ibid., 19, 318. tArch. ges. Physiol., 49, 483. § Landw. Jahrb., 20, 264. || Zeit. f. Biol., 39, 313. 56 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ‘ie nutritive ratio of 1:7.7, and caused neither a gain nor a loss a consequence. Particular interest attaches to Kellner’s second experiment in which ammonium acetate was added to a ration poor in protein (1:19), followed in a third period by a quantity of asparagin con- taining the same amount of nitrogen. The average amounts of protein (N X 6.25) gained per day and head by the two lambs were as follows: Basal ration .......... 0.0.00 seen eee es 4.12 grms. et ‘« + ammonium acetate...... 15.56 “ «+ asparagin.......... 0.06 15.69 “ Although it is impossible to suppose that the ammonium acetate is capable of performing any of the functions of proteids in the body, it nevertheless caused as great a gain of protein by the body as did the asparagin. The only obvious explanation is that both these substances acted in the manner suggested by Zuntz to protect the small amount of protein in the food from the attacks of the organized ferments of the digestive tract. Accepting this explana- ~ tion, we must suppose that when the contents of the alimentary canal contain a normal amount of proteids the micro-organisms find an abundant supply of nitrogenous food in their cleavage products and reach their normal development, so that an addition of soluble nitrogenous substances is a matter of indifference. When, on the other hand, the amount of protein present is abnormally low, as in Weiske’s and Kellner’s experiments, the organisms are limited in their food-supply and attack the food proteids them- selves. Kellner’s results stand in apparent contradiction to the earlier ones of Weiske and Flechsig,* who report no gain of proteids as re- sulting from the addition on three days of a mixture of ammonium carbonate and acetate to a ration poor in protein. The excretion of sulphur in the urine was likewise unaffected. They assume, however, a long-continued after effect of the ammonium salts on the nitrogen excretion. If the comparison be limited to the three days on which the ammonium salts were given and the next following day, a gain of 1.15 grams of nitrogen per day results, but, as just stated, there was no corresponding gain of sulphur. *Journ. f. Landw., 88, 137. METABOLISM. 57 Kellner’s experiments afford indirect evidence that both the asparagin and the ammonium acetate actually did stimulate the development of the ferment organisms, in the fact that the apparent digestibility of the carbohydrates of the food was increased. On the basal rations starch could be readily recognized in the feces, but under the influence of the two substances mentioned it dis- appeared. In the second experiment the increase in the amounts of crude fiber and of nitrogen-free extract digested was as follows: Nitrogen-free Crude Fiber. Extract. With ammonium acetate... 10.7 grms. 20.4 grms. With asparagin’........... 100 “ 20.0 “ Since we know that large amounts of the nitrogen-free extract are attacked and decomposed by organized ferments in the her- bivora, and that this is the chief if not the only method by which crude fiber is digested, we are justified in interpreting the above figures as demonstrating an increased activity of these organisms as a result of the more abundant supply of nitrogenous food. The bearing of this result upon the so-called depression of digestibility by starch and other carbohydrates is obvious, but is aside from our present discussion. Tryniszewsky * experimented upon a calf weighing about 175 kgs., using in the second and fourth periods (the first period being preliminary) a ration of barley straw, sesame cake, starch and sugar, containing a minimum of non-proteids. In the third period one- third of the sesame cake was replaced by a mixture of asparagin, starch and sesame oil, computed to contain an equivalent amount of nitrogen, carbohydrates, and fat. Owing to differences in digest- ibility, however, the amounts of digested nutrients, and particu- larly of nitrogen, varied more or less. The results of the nitrogen balance per 100 kgs. live weight were: Nitrogen Digested. : . Nitrogen Gain of Metabolism,| Nitrogen, Proteid, | Non-proteid, Total, Grms. Grimms. . Grms. Grms. Grms, Period II....... PQ16 |iccaweswus 72.16 56.86 15.3 ames WG errr 67.05 23.68 90.73 78.48 12.3 FE TV veteisiees 90.86 |.......00- 90.86 76.36 14.5 * Jahresb. Ag. Ch., 48, 513. 58 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. From the smaller gain in Period III, the conclusion is drawn that the asparagin has a lower nutritive value than the proteids. In this period the percentage digestibility of the crude fiber of the ration was found to be 64.88, as compared with 43.96 and 33.33 in the second and fourth periods, an effect corresponding to that observed by Kellner, and which Tryniszewsky also ascribes to an increase in the micro-organisms of the digestive tract. The results of the experiments which have been cited are, of course, valid, in the first instance, only for the particular non-~ proteids experimented with. If, however, the above interpretation of the results is correct, it is to be anticipated that other soluble nitrogenous substances in the food will be found to produce similar effects. If this anticipation proves to be correct, then we shall reach the following conclusions regarding the amides and similar bodies in feeding-stuffs. 1. That they do not serve as sources of proteids. 2. That in rations very poor in protein they have, in the her- bivora, an indirect effect in protecting part of the food protein from fermentation in the digestive tract. 3. That in carnivora, and in herbivora on normal rations, they probably have no effect on the production of nitrogenous tissue. CHAPTER III. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION. An essential prerequisite for an intelligent study of the income and expenditure of matter by the animal body is a knowledge of the general nature of the current methods of investigation and of the significance of the results attained by means of them. It is not the purpose here to enter into technical details; this is not a treatise upon analytical or physiological methods. The present chapter will be confined to outlining the general principles upon which those methods are based and to pointing out the logical value of their results. It will be confined, moreover, mainly to those general methods by which the balance of income and ex- penditure of matter is determined. Tissue.—The animal body has already been characterized as consisting, from the chemical point of view, of an aggregate of various substances, chiefly organic, representing a certain capital of matter and energy. These various substances are grouped together in the body to form the organized structures known as tissues. For the sake of brevity, then, it may be permissible to use the word tissue as a convenient general designation for the aggre- gate of all the organic matter contained in the tissues of the body, including both their organized elements and any materials present in the fluids of the body or in solution in the protoplasm of the cells. In this sense tissue is equivalent to the whole capital or store of organic matter in the body. Gains AND Losses.—The tissue of the body, as thus defined, is in a constant state of flux, the processes through which the vital functions are carried on constantly breaking it down and oxidizing it (katabolism), while the processes of nutrition are as constantly building it up again (anabolism). If the activity of nutrition 59 60 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. exceeds that of destruction, material of one sort or another is stored up in the body, and-such an addition to its capital of matter and energy we may speak of as a gain of tissue. Conversely, if the katabolic processes consume more material than the processes of nutrition can supply, the store of matter and energy in the body is diminished and a loss of tissue occurs. A simple comparison of the amount of matter supplied in the food (including, of course, the oxygen of the air) with that given off in the solid, liquid and © gaseous excreta, therefore, will show whether the body is gaining or losing tissue. The mere fact of a gain or loss of matter by the body, however, conveys but little useful information unless we know the nature of the material gained or lost. This we have no means of determining directly. The processes of growth or decrease are not accéssible to immediate observation, while changes in the weight of the animal (even aside from the great uncertainties introduced, especially in the herbivora, by variations in the contents of the alimentary canal) represent simply the algebraic sum of the gains and losses of water, ash protein, fats, and other materials, and so give but a very slight clue if any to the real nature of the tissue-building. We are compelled, therefore, to have recourse to indirect methods, and to base our conclusions as to tissue-building upon a comparison of the income and outgo of the chemical elements of which the body is composed, particularly of nitrogen and carbon. The Schematic Body.—The basis of this method of compari- son is the conception of the schematic body, first introduced by Henneberg.* This conception regards the dry matter of the body of the animal as composed essentially of three groups of substances, viz., ash, fat, and protein, with at most comparatively small amounts of carbohydrates (glycogen), and assumes that the vast number of other compounds which it actually contains are present in such small and relatively constant proportions as not to materially affect the truth of this view. A knowledge of the ultimate compo- sition of these three groups then affords the basis for a computation of the gain or loss of each from the income and outgo of their ele- ments. Asu.—The ash ingredients of the body form a well-defined * Neue Beitriige, etc., p. vii. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION. 61 group, and the determination of the gain or loss of each ingredient from a comparison of income and outgo is in principle a relatively simple matter and calls for no special consideration here. Fat.—The elementary composition of the fat of the body has been shown to be remarkably similar not only in different animals of the same species, but likewise in different species. The classic investigations of Schulze & Reinecke * upon the composition of animal fat gave the following results: Carbon. Hydrogen. Oxygen. No. of Sam- | Aver- | Maxi-| Mini- | Aver- | Maxi-| Mini- | Aver-| Maxi-| Mini- ples.| age |mum|mum| age |mum|mum|/ age | mum| mum Per | Per | Per | Per | Per | Per | Per | Per Per Cent, | Cent. | Cent. | Cent. | Cent. | Cent. | Cent.| Cent. | Cent. Beef fat......... 10 |'76.50/76.74)76. 27/11 .91112.11)11.'76)11 .59)11.86,11.15 Pork fat........ 6 |76.54/76.78)'76.29/11.94/12.07/11 86/11 .52/11.83)11.15 Mutton fat...... . 12 |76. 61/76. 85/76. 27/12 .03}12.16)11.87/11.36/11. 56) 11.00 Average...... 28 |76.50 12.00 11.50 Dog.....-seeeee 76.63 12.05 11.32 Cat... .ccecsccces 76.56 11.90 11.44 Horse.....+++-- 77.07 11.69 11.24 Ma Nip:e-cresiearercievars 76.62 11.94 11.44 Benedict and Osterberg ¢ obtained the following results for the composition of human fat: Carbon, Hydrogen, Per Cent. Per Cent. Sample No. 1........ 76.29 11.80 a OO ID erode tienes 76.36 11.72 “e Bxwasmaes 75.85 11.87 fe OC Aiea noste aia 75.95 11.85 ee te coavardasarece 75.94 11.74 ee BE [Grouaiaisdshcateva 16.07 11.69 fe CUE a wiguaia dates 76.13 11.84 ef © Saace CARBOHYDRATES. —C. Voit * found the hexose carbohydrates to be superior to fat in diminishing the proteid metabolism. He gives the following comparisons: Food per Day. Urea Date. per Day, Meat, | Carbohydrates or Fat, Grms. Grms. Grms, Nov. 16-22, 1857............05. 150 | 150-350 sugar 13.4 “©” 92 Dec. 2, 1857 ....2...0.. 150 250 fat 15.6 Oct. 28-Nov. 8, 1857 a Mana one 176 100-364 starch 15.1 Nov. 815, 9 © weeeeeeeeee 176 250 fat 16.2 Feb. 23-25, 1861............... 400 200 fat 31.9 © O58 cece ee 400 250 starch 30.5 “ 28-Meh. 8, 1861 wesw eens: 400 250 sugar 30.3 June 19-23, 1859........2....0. 500 250 fat 38.5 23—' ay Oe Fannay Shi saite Sha ay 500 300 sugar 32.7 © QB-29 ccc e eee ees 500 200 « 35.6 “ 3o_Tely 2, 1859 s¢ iosceinon 500 100 “ 37.9 299 B65 cus cade eee we 800 250 starch 52.8 Pep 338° eR ee 800 200 fat 54.7 26, 1864. .....200- *....{ 1000 0 73.5 ard 26 oe rs Pik oe Anastasios 1000 100 starch 68.5 “« 97 RN or on ae taae 1000 400 “ 60.2 “oF 1864 0.00... e ee 1000 0 ; A aT Ayg ee - =} 1000 100 fat 74.5 Ge cee oD 300 « 69.3 a aoe cae asain eeNeee 1000 0 80.2 2219. 1859). oes sae eee ye 2000 200-300 starch 128.4 a eg, en pean 2000 250 fat 135.9 * Zeit. f. Biol., 6, 447. 128 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Subsequent investigations have substantially confirmed this conclusion. Thus Kayser * in an experiment upon himself found that the replacements of the carbohydrates of his diet by an amount of fat equivalent to them in heat value caused a marked increase in the urinary nitrogen, resulting in a loss of this element by the body in place of the previous small gain. The possible effect upon the apparent digestibility of the proteids of the food does not appear to have been considered. Wicke & Weiske + report two series of experiments upon sheep in which equivalent (“isodynamic’’) quantities of fat and of starch were added to a basal ration. In the first series the basal ration was comparatively poor in proteids and fat, having a nutritive ratio of about 1:8.3 ; in the second series it was richer in both these substances and had a nutritive ratio of 1:5.1 and 1:6.3 for the two animals respectively. As is usually the case, the starch dimin- ished the apparent digestibility of the protein of the basal ration, while the fat produced but a slight effect in this direction. Not- withstanding this complication, however, the effect of the starch in diminishing the proteid metabolism was clearly greater than that of the fat, and if the results were corrected for the increase in the nitrogenous metabolic products in the feces they would be still more decisive. The investigations of E. Voit & Korkunoff upon the minimum of proteids, which will be considered in a subsequent paragraph, also show a superiority in this respect of the carbohydrates over the fats which these authors ascribe to the greater lability of their molecular structure which enables them to enter into reactions in the body more readily than the fats. Magnitude and Duration of the Effect.—The pre-eminent position of the proteids in nutrition has perhaps led investigators to attach undue importance to this power of the non-nitrogenous nutrients to diminish the proteid metabolism. It is well to note that it is relatively small. C. Voit, as already stated, found an average decrease of about 7 per cent. with fats and about 9 per cent. with carbohydrates, and subsequent investigators have ob- tained results entirely comparable with these. ProterD METABOLISM DETERMINED BY SuPpLy.—In the presence *y. Noorden, Pathologie des Stoffwechsels, p. 117. +Zeit. physiol. Chem., 21, 42; 22, 137. THE RELATIONS .OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 129 ot non-nitrogenous nutrients it is still true that the proteid meta- bolism, or more exactly the excretion of nitrogen, is mainly deter- mined by the supply of it in the food just as it is upon an exclusive proteid diet. Fat or carbohydrates simply produce a relatively small, and probably more or less transitory, diminution of it with- out affecting the substantial truth of the above statement. - Lawes & Gilbert,* in discussing the results of their fattening experiments upon sheep and pigs, called attention to the very wide variations in the amount of protein consumed, both per unit of weight and especiaily per unit of gain, and concluded that the ap- parent excess of protein in some cases must have served substan- tially for respiratory purposes. The subsequent investigations of Bischoff, Voit, and v. Pettenkofer upon the proteid metabolism of earnivora showed clearly that the dependence of the latter upon the proteid supply, which is so marked upon a purely proteid diet, is equally evident upon a mixed diet, and thus supplied a scientific explanation of the facts observed by Lawes & Gilbert. The effect of the proteid supply upon the nitrogen excretion is clearly shown by the following summary of Voit’s experiments: f Food. Urea Excreted, Grms. Fat. Lean Meat, Grms. Grms. 250 150 17.0 300 176 18.9 250 250 19.7 200 500 36.6 200 800 56.7 250 1500 100.7 Since Voit’s researches, “very many experiments, among the earliest of which were those of Henneberg & Stohmann { upon cattle, have confirmed his results, both for carnivora, herbivora and omnivora. A somewhat striking example is afforded by Stoh- mann’s § experiments upon milch goats which are summarized in the following table: __ *Rep. Brit Asso. Adv. Sci., 1852; Rothamsted Memoirs, Vol. IT. } Zeit. f. Biol , 5, 329. { Beitrige, etc., Heft 2, p 412. -§ Biologische Studien, 121. 130 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. B Eaten per Day. Protein Protein : Dat ea a Hay, ees d PGrms ; Grms.’ Lal Grms. Grms. 1 | May 23-29............ 1500 100 111.6 66.6 2! June 6-12............ 1450 150 125.0 79.4 3 20-26) vocccaneess 1400 200 132.2 90.6 4| July 410............ 1350 250 150.9 — 90.1 5 ee i | ee eee 1250 350 _ 170.5 101.6 6 | Aug. 8-14............ 1100 500 193.8 117.9 7 BE DDS acne scene een tyes 950 650 221.4 143.1 8 | Sept 5-11............ 800 800 257 .2 173.7 9 T1925 sieges ween 1600 0 92.9 56.3 10 | Oct. 3-9............. 1600 0 74.1 41.9 A full compilation of these earlier results has been made by v. Wolff,t and the fact is now so well established that further cita- tions would be superfluous. Rate or Nitrogen Excretion.—Some interesting hints as to the manner in which the non-nitrogenous nutrients produce the effect upon the proteid metabolism which has just been described are afforded by a consideration of the rate of nitrogen excretion under their influence. It was shown in the preceding section that the effect of a meal of proteids was a sudden, almost explosive, increase in the nitrogen cleavage and excretion, reaching its maximum within a few hours after the meal. If, however, non-nitrogenous nutrients are given along with the proteids, the character of the curve is essentially altered, the maximum rate of excretion being less and being reached somewhat later, while the fall from this maximum is less rapid. In other words, the rate of excretion becomes more uniform—the curve is flattened out. The influence of fat in this respect is clearly shown in the experiments of Panum { and of Feder { cited pre- viously, and appears evident also in those of Graffenberger.§ In the latter experiments the nitrogenous substances to be tested were added to a mixed diet. The results show a distinct maximum, but the rate of decrease after the maximum was reached was not rapid, * Exclusive of the protein of the milk. + Ernihrung Landw. Nutzthiere, pp. 285-309 } Thier. Chem. Ber., 12, 402. § Zeit. f. Biol., 28, 318. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 131 and only a part of the nitrogen appeared during the twenty-four hours following its ingestion, viz.: WH Gites ktan yeti ee hue iene 49.2 per cent. WHLl PelaUss coc lures ena eaewang 87.6 “ With peptone.............cceceeeees 67.6 “ « With Ssparapin 2,5 .ccans evares sands 799.0 “ « Rosemann’s* results upon the rate of nitrogen excretion by man, likewise cited above, indicate a similar effect of the non- nitrogenous nutrients, the fluctuations due to the ingestion of mixed food being much less sharp than those found by other experi- menters with proteids alone. If we accept Rosemann’s view (p. 101), that the sudden increase in the nitrogen cleavage is due, in part at least, to a direct stimulus to the metabolic activity of the cells, arising from the presence in the fluids of the body of an increased percentage of proteids, we may perhaps suppose that the simultaneous resorption of non- nitrogenous matter renders this stimulus less and so reduces the maximum rate of nitrogen cleavage. This conjecture possibly receives some support also from the results of Krummacher,t who, contrary to Adrian and Munk, finds that :the division of the proteid ration into several meals not only renders the rate of nitro- gen excretion more uniform, but reduces somewhat the total amount excreted. Gebhardt { has also obtained similiar results. There is also the possibility, however, that the non-nitrogenous nutrients may modify the rate at which the proteids are resorbed, or perhaps, as has been suggested by various investigators, the extent to which the proteids are converted into amide-like bodies by the pancreatic juice or the extent of proteid putrefaction in the intestines. Suggestive in this regard is the fact found by Gruber § that common salt, which acts as a stimulant to thesecretion of hydro- chloric acid by the stomach, and would thus tend to favor gastric as compared with intestinal digestion of the proteids, produces an effect on the nitrogen excretion similar to that of the non-nitroge- nous nutrients. *Arch. ges. Physiol., 65, 343. + Zeit. f. Biol., 35, 481. t Arch. ges. Physiol., 65, 611. § Zeit. f. Biol., 42, 425. 132 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. EXTENT oF Protein StoracE.—Whatever may be the expla- nation of the action of the non-nitrogenous nutrients, its effect is obvious. Attention has already been called (p. 102) to Gruber’s hypothesis that the transitory storage of nitrogen following an increase in the proteid supply is the result of a superposition of the daily curves of nitrogen excretion. The effect of the non-nitroge- nous nutrients appears to be to diminish the rate of nitrogen cleavage and to protract it, in the case of a single meal of proteids, over a longer time. Evidently, then, an increase of the proteid supply in a mixed diet, or the addition of non-nitrogenous nutrients to a pro- teid diet, will extend its effect over a considerably longer period than in case of an exclusive proteid diet—that is, nitrogen equi- librium will be reached more slowly, and there will be a longer or shorter time after the change during which the nitrogen excretion will be less than in the absence of the non-nitrogenous matters. This explanation also implies, however, that the storage of nitrogenous matter in the body of the mature animal is of limited duration and that no long-continued gain of protein can occur; in other words, that it is impossible to materially increase the proteid tissue (lean meat) of a mature animal. Numerous comparative fattening experiments with domestic animals, notably those of Henneberg, Kern, & Wattenberg * upon sheep, fully sustain this conclusion. On the other hand, metabo- lism experiments with domestic animals rarely show an equality between the income of nitrogen and its outgo in feces and urine, but almost always indicate a gain of nitrogenous matter by the body. As regards the significance of this fact, however, several considerations must be borne in mind. First, the normal growth of the epidermal tissues—hair or wool, hoofs, horns, etc.—as pointed out in Chapter III, consumes a por- tion of the nitrogen of the food and contributes its share to the storage of nitrogen in the body. , Second, the adipose tissue itself contains a small percentage of _ proteid matter, and a storage of fat in considerable amounts in- volves the production of new adipose tissue in which to store it. Third, in many cases the metabolism experiments which show astorage of nitrogen have been made within a rather short time * Jour. f. Landw., 26, 549. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 133 after a change in the ration, and can therefore be interpreted as showing simply that sufficient time had not elapsed to reach nitro- gen equilibrium. If we consider also the somewhat indefinite nature of the term mature, and likewise the possibilities of error due to mechanical losses of excreta and to escape of nitrogen from the latter by fermen- tation and decomposition, we can readily see why the results of a short metabolism experiment may not agree with those of a long fattening experiment; yet, nevertheless, it must be confessed that the impression left by a comparison of the whole mass of evidence is that the discrepancy is as yet but partially explained. In conclusion, we may anticipate a discussion in Chapter VI, and call attention to the fact that muscular exertion may, to a limited extent at least, stimulate those constructive processes which result in a storage of protein in the body. The Minimum of Proteids.—In the preceding section it ap- peared that the administration of proteid food to a previously fast- ing animal caused a prompt and large“increase in the nitrogen cleavage and excretion, while but a comparatively small portion of the proteids was applied to constructive purposes, the result being that two to three times as much proteids must be given as are metabolized during fasting before nitrogen equilibrium is reached. This effect was there ascribed to the stimulating effect of the rapid digestion and resorption of the proteids upon the nitro- gen cleavage, much of the proteids being apparently destroyed as such before they can serve for tissue-building. We have just seen that the effect of the non-nitrogenous nutri- ents is to diminish somewhat the nitrogen cleavage, apparently by moderating this stimulating effect. The necessary result is that, as the nitrogen supply is increased, it and the nitrogen excretion will start more nearly together and approach each other more rapidly upon a mixed diet than upon one consisting of proteids only. Conse- quently, while the percentage decrease in the proteid metabolism is, as we have seen, relatively small, nitrogen equilibrium may be reached with a much smaller supply of proteids than is the case in the absence of the non-nitrogenous nutrients. Indeed, it is con- ceivable that a sufficient supply of carbohydrates or fats in the diet should practically destroy the stimulative effects of the proteids. in 134 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. which case we might expect a proteid supply equal to the fasting proteid metabolism to be sufficient to produce nitrogen equilibrium. Seen in this light, the apparently insignificant effect of the non- nitrogenous nutrients becomes a very important factor in nutrition. The effect of the non-nitrogenous nutrients in largely diminish- ing the necessary proteid supply was pointed out by C. Voit * and appears clearly in many of his experimental results. Thus from the summary on p. 95 it appears that from 1200 to 1500 grams of lean. meat per day was required to maintain the animal experimented upon in nitrogen equilibrium. When fat or carbohydrates were added to the ration, however, strikingly different results were reached, as appears from the following comparative statement, the results being expressed as “flesh” with 3.4 per cent. of nitrogen: Food. Flesh : Meta- Gain of Meat. | Fator Carbo-| bolized. ae hydrates. 300 | ....... 416 —116 GOO! |) eesti gee 674 — 74 Meat only (average of both series). 900° || “eee ears 943 — 43 1200 | ....... 1207 — 7 1500 | ....... 1478 + 22 500 250 444 + 56 Meat and fat ..............---- 800 200 720 + 80 1000 250 875 +125 500 300-100 502 - 2 wae oo ——) 800 100_400 763 4 37 gp WIG) esi etriacem eg eee octeegas 1000 100-400 902 + 88 In the presence of non-nitrogenous nutrients, nitrogen equi- librium was reached with quantities of proteids from one third to one half as great as the amount required when fed alone. In other words, the non-nitrogenous nutrients materially reduced the mini- mum of food proteids required to maintain the proteid tissues of . the body. In view of the peculiar importance of the proteids in nutri- tion, as well as of their relative scarcity and high cost, particu- larly in the food of. our domestic animals, great interest attaches to a determination of the least amount required to sustain a mature * Zeit. f. Biol., 5. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 1 35 animal. The results obtained by E. Voit & Korkunoff * regard- ing the minimum requirement upon an exclusive proteid diet have already been stated in the first section of this chapter (p. 95). The same investigators have also studied the more interesting question of how far the necessary proteid supply can be reduced in the presence of non-nitrogenous nutrients. PRoTEIDS AND Fat.—The experiments were upon the same general plan as those just referred to on proteids alone. Beginning with an insufficient quantity of proteids, the amount was gradually increased, that of the fat remaining constant, until nitrogen equi- librium was reached. As in those experiments, too, the nitrogen of the food was practically all in the proteid form, and its amount is compared with the proteid nitrogen excreted, it being assumed that 18.45 per cent. of the urinary nitrogen was derived from the extractives of the flesh metabolized in the body. To the writer it would seem that a more suitable unit would be the total excretory nitrogen, since the proteids of the food had to make good the loss of extractives as well as of true proteids from the body, and the former loss is as unavoidable as the latter. Accordingly, the results have been stated in the table below in both ways. Two series of experiments were made: one in which the total food-supply was less than was required to supply the estimated demands of the body for energy, and one in which it considerably exceeded that demand, with the following results: Per Cent. of Energy | Mivimum of Food Nitrogen, Total Demand Supplied by : Per Cent of Fasting E: tion, ; Fasting, Total Amount, Metabolism, oe Per Gent. Food, Grms. Total, | Proteid, Per Cent. Per Cent./Per Cent Series I: i Experiment 1 ....) 4.85 72 90 7.63 157 193 ee 2 cee} 4.22 73 86 |>5.61 |>1383 |>163 Series II: Experiment 3 ....| 4.98 116 128 |>6.61 |[>1383. |>162 a 4....| 4.01 127 140 §.12 128 157 ee 5 ....| 3.86 137 150 5.07 131 161 The authors also compute from experiments by C. Voit and by Rubner percentages lying between 162 and 207, and state as their * Zeit. f. Biol., 32, 58. 136 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. final result that the minimum of proteid nitrogen on a diet of pro- teids and fat lies between 160 and 200 per cent. of the proteid nitro- gen excreted during fasting. These figures when computed on the total excretory nitrogen would become 131 per cent. and 163 per cent. respectively. PROTEIDS AND CARBOHYDRATES.—We have seen (p. 127) that the carbohydrates diminish the proteid metabolism to a greater extent than the fats. The results which have been reached as to their effect in lowering the minimum demand for proteids are on the whole in accord with this fact. With a liberal supply of carbo- hydrates in the food, a much smaller quantity of proteids would seem to suffice to maintain nitrogen equilibrium than when the non-nitrogenous matter of the ration consists of fat. Indeed, ac- cording to some investigators, the proteid metabolism may evet. be thus reduced much below that during fasting. Munk * appears to have been the first to advance the view last mentioned. In an investigation upon the formation of fat from carbohydrates a dog was fasted for thirty-one days and then re- ceived a diet consisting of a little meat with large amounts of carbohydrates (starch and sugar) and also, during the first twelve days, gelatin. Omitting these twelve days and also the earlier days. of the fasting period, the average daily excretion of nitrogen in the urine was Twelfth to thirty-first days of fasting........... 5.38 grams Thirteenth to twenty-fourth days of feeding (200 grams meat, 500 grams carbohydrates)..... 5.79 On the seventeenth day of the feeding the urinary nitrogen reached the minimum of 4.133 grams, and Munk regards this as. showing the possibility of a reduction of the proteid metabolism considerable below the fasting level. It is to be noted, however, that the nitrogen excretion varied considerably from day to day,. and a selection of a single day for comparison seems hardly justified. Hirschfeld ¢ and Kumagawa { found that the nitrogen equili- * Arch. path. Anat. u. Physiol., 101, 91. + Ibid., 114, 301. } Ibid., 116, 370. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 137 brium of man could be maintained on a diet containing little nitro- gen but abundance of non-nitrogenous nutrients. Under these conditions the urinary nitrogen was reduced to 5.87 grams and 6.07 grams per day respectively, and the total nitrogen excretion to 7.45 grams and 8.10 grams, amounts much lower than have been observed for fasting men. Thus in the extensive investigations by Lehmann, Miiller, Munk, Senator, & Zuntz* of the metabolism of two fasting men, much higher figures than the above were ob- tained for the urinary nitrogen, and Munk (loc. cit., -p. 225) calls attention to the fact that in one case the urinary nitrogen on the second day succeeding the fasting period was materially less than on the last day of the fasting, viz., 8.26 grams as compared with 9.88 grams. In a subsequent series of experiments upon dogs, Munk + showed that by very liberal feeding with food poor in proteids (rice with small amounts of meat) the nitrogen balance could be maintained for a considerable time at an amount very much lower than pre- vious observers had found for' the proteid metabolism of fasting dogs of similar weight. Length | Average Food per Day. Urinary of Exper- sere ‘ ; see iment, eight, . , 4 eee 5 11.20 55 116 2.63 2.61 é N fl oes 5 10.21 38 96 2.48 2.40 Wathtoads \a0T. os: 4 9.88 | 53 | 108 | 2.66 | 2.67 LV esses 4 8.25 47 100 2.60 2.62 f Munk....... 14.4 3.65 Fasting {eaick ee: 8.9 5.10 Munk also cites in support of his conclusions Rubner’s results on a dog fed exclusively on carbohydrates. A reference to these results as tabulated on a subsequent page does in fact show in most cases a decrease in the proteid metabolism as compared with the fasting values, but how much of this is due to the normal decrease during the first few days of abstinence from proteid food it is dif- * Arch. path. Anat. u. Physiol., 131, Supp. ft Ibid., 182, 91. 138 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ficult to decide. Munk also cites results obtained by Salkowski,* who observed the nitrogen excretion of a dog on a light ration con- taining but little proteids to be scarcely greater than in the absence of all food. E. Voit & Korkunoff (loc. cit.) also included the carbohydrates in their investigation upon this subject, following the same general method as in the experiments with fat. The following are their results compared with the fasting proteid metabolism exactly as in the former case: Per Cent. of Minimum of Food Nitrogen. Total Energy D d Live |Nitrogen| Supplied by |. Per Cent.of Fasting Weight, Excre- : Metabolism. K tion 88. | Fasting, | Carbo- Fou. aeoust Grms. |hydrates,| pe, + Total, | Proteid, Per Cent.! Cent. Per Cent.|Per Cent. Series I: } Experiment 3a| 24.0 | 4.93 78 | 91 | >5.43 | >110 | >133 « 2 24.6 | 4.94 79 92 5.00 101 124 Series II: . Experiment 5 2 4.98 111 | 122 5.11 103 126 se 1 24.1 5.25 115 | 126 | >4.91 >94 | >123 nf 2 24.7 | 4.94 118 | 131 | <4.35 <88 | <108 re 4 30.0; 4.08 122 | 136 | <4.47 | <110 | <134 ee 3b| 24.0 | 4.93 155 | 168 | <4.48 <91 ) <111 The authors also compute from a few experiments by C. Voit and by Rubner values not inconsistent with the above. When compared with the total nitrogen excretion, the results of Voit & Korkunoff show in but a single case a minimum unmistak- ably greater than the fasting proteid metabolism. In three cases the minimum falls below this amount, while in the remaining cases it is either substantially equal to it or doubtful. Regarded in this way, they seem on the whole in accord with Munk’s claim that the proteid metabolism may be reduced below the fasting limit. Voit & Korkunoff, however, dispute this and subject Munk’s experi- ments to a detailed criticism, the prineipal points of which are that in the earlier experiments, as noted above, the nitrogen excre- tion was irregular and that the result of a single day is arbi- trarily selected for comparison, while in the later experiments no * Zeit. physiol. Chem., 1, 44. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 139 determinations of the fasting metabolism of the animals actually used for the experiments were made. By a re-computation of Munk’s experiments they obtain results varying but little from 100 per cent. A computation from the average figures given on p. 136, assuming 3.4 per cent. of nitrogen in the meat and 0.51 grams of nitrogen per day in the feces, shows that the minimum is probably less than 107 per cent. of the fasting nitrogen excretion. Much depends, however, upon whether we take as the unit of comparison the total nitrogen excretion or, like Voit & Korkunoff, eliminate that portion derived from the extractives. If we select the former, then it appears that with a liberal supply of carbohy- drates in the food the supply of proteids certainly need not exceed the fasting metabolism in order to maintain nitrogen equilibrium, and perhaps may be reduced materially below it. . Finally, it must be remembered that the fasting proteid meta- bolism itself is not a constant. In Chapter IV it was shown that as the store of fat in the body of a fasting animal becomes depleted the body proteids are drawn upon to an increasing extent to supply energy to the animal. It is not possible to show that the experi- mental results which have been cited are materially affected by this variability of the fasting proteid metabolism—indeed, it seems doubtful whether they are—but the fact that the demands of the organism for energy may affect the proteid metabolism is of itself sufficient to show that our uhit of comparison, while practically convenient and perhaps sufficiently accurate, is not invariable. Amount oF NOon-nriTRoGENous Nutrients REquirepD.—In most of the experiments which have been cited, the very low figures for the necessary proteid supply have been obtained by the em- ployment of an amount of non-nitrogenous nutrients materially in excess of the estimated requirements of the animal for energy, although in no case was this latter factor actually determined. Sivén,* however, experimenting upon himself with a diet equal in amount to that ordinarily required to maintain his weight, was able to gradually reduce the total nitrogen of his food to 4.52 grams and maintain nitrogen equilibrium. He did not determine his fast- ing metabolism, but the above figure, which is equivalent to 0.08 gram of nitrogen per kilogram live weight, is lower than the low- * Skand. Arch. f. Physiol., 10, 91. 140 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. est fasting values previously obtained, Moreover, much of the nitrogen of his food was in the non-proteid form, the proteid nitro- -. gen being estimated at only 0.03 gram per kilogram live weight. Cremer & Henderson * have attempted to reproduce Sivén’s results in two experiments upon a dog, the total amount of food being equal to or slightly less than the estimated requirements of the animal. Under these conditions they were unable to reach even as low a minimum as did Voit & Korkunoff. On the other hand, Jaffa,t in a dietary study of a child on a diet of fruits and nuts (so-called frutarian diet), observed a gain of nitrogen by the sub- ject with only 0,041 gram of food nitrogen per kilogram body weight. Tue Minimum For Herpivora.—The ordinary food of our domestic herbivora contains an abundance of non-nitrogenous matter and relatively little protein. It is impossible, for obvious reasons, to determine the fasting metabolism of ruminants, and the basis for comparisons like those made above is therefore largely lacking. There is, however, abundant evidence to show that only a comparatively small amount of proteids is necessary to maintain the nitrogen equilibrium of cattle in particular, although exact data as to the least amount required are still lacking. The early experiments of Henneberg & Stohmann ft upon the maintenance ration of cattle furnish the following examples of the sufficiency of a very small proteid supply, the results being com- puted per 500 kgs. live weight per day: Digested, Gain of Non-nitrogenous , Protein, ; Qrms. Gms,” | Nutrients Ox I: z §Period Tigo s sieeeive. d grole ares cree 178 4247 4.0 OAD acted aaGiern aia teeiete ater ete 259 3546 21.0 SOT AD vatots 5: sSabateusc 0 sielnane malerns 209 * 3926 11.0 Ox IT: Period 2: ves ea wew oes seas s oven 278 ~ 3607 19.5 * Zeit. f. Biol., 42, 612. + U.S. Dept Agr., Office of Expt. Stations, Bull. 107, 21. t Beitrage zur Begriindung einer rationellen Fitterung der Wiederkaiier, Heft I. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 141 The following figures, obtained by the same investigators * in later experiments, are taken from Wolff’s compilation: + Tike Digested. Gain of Welghts Noncate by Antal ; Kgs. Protein, Nutrieas, Genie. 1860-61. Ox I. Period 5.......... 514 315 2435 0 fs ee Ce es 531 405 4090 + 9.6 as PE AG canvas easton t 533 375 4980 +24.8 Ox II. Period 6.......... 625 280° 3060 + 9.6 ae MS WSreawswas gate 643 435 4590 +14.4 1865. Ox I. Experiment 1...... 638 395 4995 + 0.5 . - 2a wees 643 410 3610 — 0.8 x a Di hitie t 661 400 3620 + 4.0 Ox II. . Oeewidsene 701 445 5540 — 6.4 sg fa Geis incsea 715 390 6060 + 3.2 G. Kthn’s extensive investigations at Méckern,{ together with subsequent ones by Kellner,§ afford the following data for the periods in which the ration was approximately a maintenance ration: : In Digested Food. in of Want smoisbonsaue| Nitvoren * F etabolizable ‘Animal, Hes” | ryote, (acres. | dime Kithn’s Experiments: Ox II. Period 1.......... 632 413 16388 + 0.1 SE TEM OE Bei ons Seen 632 338 17986 — 2.6 HET SE “Gis Gretsrastots a 631 339 18077 — 0.5 OTVe. OP PDD esate ep 623 320 17125 — 5.7 a Poe rere 602 451 15072 + 8.5 ae) Cones We tee ee 644 458 15872 + 6.3 a), © Oma San spe tear ater teas 672 540 17416 + 3.3 Keillner’s Experiments: Ox: Anse ace. ace isin 620 440 16322 + 6.2 OB cit atx aes athe oa ee 612 213 15447 —14.6 BF SD cassie tip ees aeavuiar Otay 748 343 13716 —13.8 BED Deis abate oi Grauavare auetes 28 Se 750 696 18655 — 2.8 fT Nice sisisokcia ote 3 oe 858 665 24558 + 5.1 * Beitrige, etc., Heft II., and Neue Beitriige, etc. + Ernihrung landw. Nutzthiere, pp. 406-410. t Landw. Vers. Stat., 44, 257. § Ibid., 47, 275; 50, 245, 142 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Experiments by the writer * have shown that nitrogen equi- librium may be maintained, for a time at least, on even smaller amounts of protein than the above figures would indicate. The figures in the first column of the following table signify the proteid nitrogen only of the food multiplied by 6.25: Digested Pro- Meta- i tails per Day polizable pmeee Caney oes Nutritive and 500 Kgs. Energy Weight,| by Body, Ratio a bal t, tga Kgs. Grms. Abts Experiment I: teer 1 129 7956 420 —2.51 20.1 oo? 113 7588 450 —0.39 20.4 “ 3 133 7191 400 —1.08 18.6 Experiment II; OCT sas atch tein ve 192 8144 420 +1.76 13.4 BE SD aasecacece Desi 202 9590 450 +4.23 13.6 he wilaatatects eats 209 8084 400 +4.62 12.8 Experiment VI: Heer Vics nas spew a 297 11130 450 +4.67 10.9 ae errr 277 11318 490 +6.47 10.9 OO Biv d eee aw 314 11324 430 +2.65 10.6 Experiment VII teer 1........., 156 11955 450 +5.68 23.0 a ere 131 11904 490 +3.98 25.3 Pe SD Nin gee Sasa 152 11557 430 +4.15 23.9 Experiment VIII: Heer. sas staid 258 11634 543 +0.26 10.4 pala? een serene 242 12976 629 —0.20 10.7 SED TB eats Bare ior 275 12030 516 |) —2.31 10.6 While the above data are hardly sufficient to fix absolutely the minimum of proteids for cattle on a maintenance ration, they indi- cate clearly that from 200 to 300 grams of digestible protein per day .is at least sufficient for a steer weighing 500 kgs., and there is a “ possibility that the amount may be somewhat further reduced. Although we are unable to compare this with the fasting meta- bolism, a comparison on the basis of live weight with some of the results previously cited shows that the minimum demand for pro- teids on the part of cattle is relatively much less than on the part of carnivora. Thus the results obtained by Lehmann et. al. and Munk (p. 137), and by Voit & Korkunoff (p. 138), computed in * Penna. Expt. Station, Bull. 42, 165. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 143 grams of food nitrogen per kilogram live weight, give the following figures for the minimum nitrogen requirements of the dog and of man as compared with cattle: Experiments on Dogs. 0.235 gram, 0.243 “ Munkseic ocksie heat wyohet oud kesecais 0.269 « 0.315 “ Average..... 0... e cece eee 0.266 “ >0.226 “ 0.203“ 0.185 Voit & Korkunoff................00.. >0.204 “ <0.176 “ <0.149 “ <0.187 “ Experiments on Man. 0.190 “ 0.180 “ Lehmann ef al... 1... ccc neces 0.090 « 0.180 “ Experiments on Cattle. Range of experiments cited ........ 0.064-0.098 gram. Only one of the results on man, together with the very low figure obtained by Sivén (p. 139), is comparable with those reached. with cattle. Whether we are to ascribe the small demand of the latter for proteids to a specific difference in their rate of meta- bolism or to the Jarge amounts of carbohydrate material which they habitually consume does not clearly appear. Errects upon Heavrtu.—Munk, in his experiments with rations very poor in proteids, made the observation that while such raticns were adequate to maintain the nitrogen balance of the body they nevertheless appeared to produce, in time, profound functional dis- turbances, sometimes ending in death. Similar cbservations have also been made by Rosenheim.* These experimenters ascribe * Arch. ges. Physiol., 54, 61. 144 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the ill effects directly to the small supply of proteids, but some other writers appear inclined to explain them as due to the long continu- ance of a uniform and rather artificial diet. The writer’s experi- ments, cited above, showed no evidence of any ill effect in the case of cattle upon a ration containing but about 200 grams digestible pro- tein per day and continued for seventy days, and subsequent obser- vations, as well as the common experience of farmers in wintering cattle upon such feeding-stuffs as inferior hay, straw, etc., fully confirm this result. Effects on Total Metabolism. Substitution for Body Fat.—We have seen in the preceding - section that proteid food, or rather the non-nitrogenous residue arising from its cleavage in the body, may be utilized as a source of energy in place of the body fat which would otherwise be meta- bolized. Similarly, the non-nitrogenous nutrients supplied in the food may be thus substituted for body fat in the metabolism of the animal. The substitution is shown most clearly in experiments upon fasting animals, although it appears also in those in which these nutrients are added to an insufficient ration. Fat.—The following averages of Pettenkofer & Voit’s experi- ments,* computed from Atwater & Langworthy’s digest,t illustrate this substitution of food fat for body fat: Gain or Loss by Body. Food, Number of Grms. Experiments. : Nitrogen, Fat, Grms. Grms. Nothing 5 —6.64 — 97.76 100 fat 2 —4.90 — 16.25 350 “ 1 —7.70 +113.60 The smaller amount of fat not only diminished the proteid meta- bolism but also largely reduced the loss of fat from the body. The larger amount of fat showed the tendency noted on p. 115 to increase the proteid metabolism, but at the same time it not only suspended the loss of body fat but caused a storage of fat in the organism. Of course we have no means of distinguishing in such a case between * Zeit. f. Biol., 5, 370. { U.S. Dept. Agr., Office of Experiment Stations, Bull. 45. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 145 food fat and body fat, but it is most natural to suppose that the re- sorbed fat of the food, being already in circulation in the body, is more easily accessible to the active cells than the stored-up fat of the adipose tissue and is, therefore, metabolized in preference to the latter. . , Rubner,* in his study of the replacement values of the several nutrients, has demonstrated the same effect of food fat. Fat supplied in the food is utilized as a source of energy to the body and a corresponding quantity of body fat escapes oxidation, while if supplied in excess fat is stored up in the body. The experiments were made in the same manner and are computed on the same assumptions as those upon proteids recorded on p. 106. All were on dogs except the third, which was on a rabbit. Total Nitrogen Fat Gain or Loss Food. of Excreta, Metabolized, of Fat, QGrms. Grms. Grms. IN@tHin Bh ois tuu d's Ss aceaie saeende 1.69 60.47 — 60.47 200 grms. bacon............. 1.68 71.80 +128.20 NOthINg 2s. bisa ccna sas 2.14 33.78 — 33.78 39.75 grms. of butter fat..... 2.44 33.48 + 6.27 NOthing sv. ccicc ce ones ead 0.778 7.18 — 7.18 26.1 grms. baconf.......... 1.045 6.44 + 19.63 NOthiD 8 icaccctectarsenciet nig 2.56 42.40 — 42.40 100 grms. fat..............4- 2.48 47.73 + 52.27 Nothing ccc ease vesne stawens 1.08 22.88 — 22.88 40 grms. bacon.............. 1.32 28 .73 + 11.27 In nearly every case there was a slight increase in the proteid metabolism, as in Pettenkofer & Voit’s experiments, and a some- what greater, although still not very considerable, increase in the fat metabolism. In the main, however, the food fat was metabolized in place of the body fat. In those of Pettenkofer & Voit’s experiments in which fat was added to an insufficient ration of meat the same effect was pro- duced, as appears when we compare the results upon aration of meat * Zeit. f. Biol., 19, 328-334; 80, 123. { Results approximate only. 146 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. and fat given on p. 150 with those upon the same ration of meat without the fat, as in the table below: Number Food per Day. Gain or Loss by Body. of Experi Meat, Fat, Nitrogen. Carbon. saith Grms. Grms. Grms. ° Grms.’ 6 500 fo —3.4 —49.1 1 500 100 +0.3 +27.1 “ FE oe ee 5 500 200 —0.6 +67.3 CaRBOHYDRATES. — The more soluble hexose carbohydrates when given to a fasting animal serve, like the fats, as a source of energy for the organism in place of the body fat which would other- wise be oxidized. The following is a summary of the average results obtained by Pettenkofer & Voit * by feeding starch with a small amount of fat, the fasting metabolism being the same as that just given on p. 144. The averages are computed as before from Atwater & Langworthy’s digest (loc. cit.): Number Food per Day. Gain or Loss by Body. of E: i- r oe. | Ge | cee, | | ee Fasting .............. 5 ere ters —6.64 | —97.76 1 450 16.9 —7.20 | +19.40 Starch ............... 1 597 21.2 —9.40 | —28.50 3 700 20.2 —6.20 | +61.30 The fasting metabolism in this case represents a series of experi- ments antedating by a year or two that upon starch. In only one case were the respiratory products of the fasting animal determined during the latter series. That determination immediately fol- lowed a day on which a large amount of starch was consumed, and the results are believed by the authors to be affected thereby. No very strict comparison is therefore possible, but the general effect of the starch in diminishing the loss of body fat is evident. * Zeit. f. Biol., 9, 485. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 147 The experiments by Rubner,* which have been already several times referred to, include trials in which sugar or starch was fed alone. The results are computed as previously described, with the additional assumption that all the carbohydrates digested (with the exception of small amounts of sugar found in the urine in some cases) were completely oxidized in the body. The gain or loss of carbon as fat is therefore computed by subtracting from the total excretory carbon, first, the carbon due to the protein metabolized, and second, that assumed to be derived from the carbohydrates. On this basis the results are as follows, the amounts of carbohydrates given in the table being those believed to have been actually oxi- dized : Total Nitrogen | Total Carbon Gain or Loss Food. of Excreta, of Excreta,t of Fat, Grms. Grms. Grms NOth isc ma dn adds Seale eas 1.94 38.18 — 40.99 76.12 grms. cane-sugar......... 1.45 43.19 — 8.4] 104.97 “ Ne ee Crasaibaielatens 1.07 47.78 + 0.51 Nothing esi esac ds wae veer ene 1.86 39.22 — 42.72 97.3 grms. cane-sugar 1.92 50.69 — 2.95 17.0 “ ie 1.41 39.52 — 35.80 143.0 “ ee | 155.4] 157.4] ..... 157.1] 164.8] 155.3| 160.7| 147.1| 154.1 “ 28...) 159.2] 150.7| 158.5] 155.0} 178.1| 163.2) 158.8] 172.9] 153.9 May 2...| 176.6 185.0] 158.2] 173.6] 171.8] 161.8 '173.4| 163.3) 180.2 4...| 156.1) 167.6| 159.9| 152.4] 166.2] 156.0| 164.2] 159.0] 160.1. Totals. .. ./1129.6|1120.0! 974.3/1115. 5/1199. 8/1131 .9}1167 .9]1150.711147.9 Averages.| 161.4 160.0 162.4 159.4) 171.4! 161.7 166.8 164.4 164.0 [ee 160.8 164.2. It being well established that lactic acid is readily oxidized in the body (compare p. 27), it is evident that in these experiments it must have protected the body fat from being metabolized, since otherwise the consumption of oxygen would have increased. Simi- ‘lar, although not decisive, results were obtained with sodium buty- rate. On the other hand, sodium lactate administered by the mouth caused more or less increase in the oxygen: cousumption, Wolfers * has reported confirmatory results with sodium lactate. Munk + injected sodium butyrate into the veins of fasting rabbits curarized to eliminate the effects of muscular activity and secure uniform metabolism, .and determined the respiratory exchange by the Zuntz method (p. 72). The oxidation of sodium butyrate according to the equation. C,H,NaO,+50,=3CO,+3H,0+NaHCo, corresponds to a respiratory quotient of 0.6, which is less than that * Arch. ges. Physiol., 82, 222. + Ibid., 46, 322. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 159 of the fasting animal. The material lowering of the quotient which was observed was therefore interpreted as showing that the sodium butyrate was oxidized; and this conclusion was confirmed by the strongly alkaline character of the urine and the absence from it of butyric acid. The amount of sodium butyrate injected during 1} to 1} hours was sufficient in the several experiments to supply from 60 to 100 per cent. of the respiratory demand of the fasting animal. If this had been oxidized uselessly—that is, if the energy liberated had not been of use to the organism—then the consump- tion of oxygen and elimination of carbon dioxide should have in- creased correspondingly. This, however, was far from being the case, as the following fifteen-minute averages for the periods before, during, and after the injection show: sa - Carbon... was Acid Oxygen Dioxid Respira- Teyentod. [Conmumed,| eoreted, | ut at Animal I, weight 1.92 kgs.: Before injection ear ecatite ie aa cdemiadiedvall Cures 260.9 196.1] 0.75 During: “S etka tyaele ere 28 0.133 280.0 190.5 0.68 After a ee ee 253.3 181.2 | 0.71 Animal II, weight 1.9 kgs.: Before injection..............0002) ce eee 290.9 228.3 | 0.78 During Ro seeisiefa vidas dgphovar dee ie Se 0.199 325.2 214.6 0.66 After OO Uadhee teen are 0 Sete || Rare ieads 299.4 230.9 0.78 Animal III, weight 1.82 kgs. Before injection............0...06) se eee 305.3 | 243.4] 0.79 During “8 acids esis sw nesedcsince 6 0.206 | 330.9 | 238.0} 0.72 After EE bles baud mlaihareleroalal |) inactiaxe 306.6 235.3 0.77 Animal IV, weight 1.47 kgs.: Before injection s.opd Joy g[quyreae) dn pasoys yon :90UBysqns snouszOI}IN 278 jos 92 GL G9 eG j49 JT9 JBL Pore esearour ur dn paioyg | 0°38 |0'F4 |O'IS jO°I8S |O'F9 jO' LG |O'SET [O° 4OT |O'OOT |" *****pooj ul paumnsuoy J eeg¢ |2°69 |lo-9¢ |e9¢ g's jas |Pso |g-e¢ |G Lb Joc “*(peonpoid) pouts0y Apwar oN, 99 |€4 (62 |6L FST le 9G [SIT | 0 |9'ST * poo} ur paurros Apeoy f 780 66S [0°29 [6°89 |I'P9 |2'TL |O'6L |9'69 [BEL JT EQ ports eseoioul ut dn pei0jg : 6 80 ZL 9 g ¥ g z I 170 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Even on the most extreme assumptions it is only possible to regard the fat produced as derived wholly from the proteids of the food in three cases in which an excessive proportion of the latter was fed. If the probable digestibility of the foods used be considered, and Henneberg’s factor (51.4 per cent.) for the possible production of fat from proteids be used, the results show even more decidedly a formation of fat from carbohydrates. In a later paper,* in reply to criticisms, the authors state that they have reviewed and recal- culated many of their experiments with the result that, while the experiments with ruminants (sheep and oxen) failed to furnish con- clusive evidence of the formation of fat from carbohydrates, a large number of those with pigs unquestionably showed such for- mation. In view of their historical interest it has seemed desirable to give the results of Lawes & Gilbert’s experiments in some detail, although at the time they hardly secured the recognition which was due them and Voit’s views became the generally accepted theory for the next twenty-five years. Notwithstanding the latter fact, however, results of experiments on herbivorous animals speed- ily began to accumulate which were difficult to reconcile with Voit’s hypothesis. Experiments on Ruminants.—Experiments on milch cows were made by Voit himself, as already noted. G. Kithn & Fleischer + a little later discussed the results of two of their extensive feeding experiments on milch cows in their bearing on this point, and M. Fleischer { did the same with the results of similar experiments made by Wolff and himself.§ Their results are tabulated on the opposite page. Neither Voit’s nor Fleischer’s results are such as to require the assumption of a formation of fat from carbohydrates. Those of Kiihn & Fleischer show a small excess of fat in the milk over that producible from the fat and proteids of the food, but the authors * Jour. Anat. and Physiol., 9, 577; Rothamsted Memoirs, Vol. IV. + Landw. Vers. Stat., 10, 418; 12, 451. t Virchow’s Archiv, 51, 30. § Jour. f. Landw., 19, 371, and 20, 395. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 171 Fat of | Fat from Fat of . Total, rs Fodder, | Protein, Grme. the Milk, Grms. Grms. Grms. Voit: | Experiment Ged ngreaciia aa 318.8 | 401.8 | 720.6 | 577.5 Devaar paige Gass 276.0 | 308.5] 584.5 | 337.3 Hua & Pinter: | Bivens] ies.g | 8-8] 8.0 | arr Fleischer: {SPERMS Tycc cs] 188'8 | 70:0 | 3368 | 30:8 regard the differences as within the limits of error in such experi- ments. Studies of the results of fattening experiments with ruminants give similar results. On the basis of Lawes & Gilbert’s determi- nations of the composition of the increase of live weight in fattening, | the amount of fat produced in such an experiment may be approxi- mately computed and compared with the amounts of proteids and fat in the food. Such a comparison by the writer * in seventy-seven experiments on sheep showed that, with one or two possible excep- tions, the fat and proteids of the food were sufficient to account for the amount of fat formed, although in some of the experiments little margin was left. Experiments on Swine-—Experiments with swine, on the other hand, as Wolff t has shown, have almost without exception given results which can scarcely be explained except upon the hypothesis of a formation of fat from carbohydrates. These animals, as Lawes & Gilbert pointed out in their early papers, are especially adapted to experiments of this sort, since they consume a relatively large amount of easily digestible food, have a small proportion of offal to carcass, and are by nature inclined to lay on fat readily. It was therefore to be expected that experiments upon swine would ‘show a production of fat from carbohydrates, if such took place, more decisively than those upon ruminants. Experiments on pigs by Weiske & Wildt,{ it is true, on the same plan as those by Lawes & Gilbert, yielded results consistent with Voit’s theory, showing a formation of 5565 grams of fat in the * Manual of Cattle Feeding, p. 177. + Erndhrung Landw. Nutzth., pp. 354-356 t Zeitschrift f. Biol., 10, 1. 172 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. body as compared with a possible 6724 grams from the fat and proteids of the food. The feeds used, however, were not well suited to young animals and the gain was abnormally small in proportion to the food consumed, so that the results could not be expected to be decisive. Moreover, the presence of non-proteid nitrogen in the food is not considered in the computation. (See the next paragraph.) Sourcés of Uncertainty.—Up to this point the results of experi- ments on herbivorous.and omnivorous animals had been somewhat conflicting. Before taking up the later investigations it is desir- able to point out some of the uncertainties attaching to experiments such as those above enumerated. These relate, first, to the amount of fat actually produced, and second, to the possible sources of supply in the food. The basis for estimating the amount of fat-actually produced by a fattening animal was in two cases a comparison with the amount in a supposedly similar animal at the beginning of the fattening, the fattened animal being actually analyzed. In the remainder the increase in live weight was assumed to have the composition found by Lawes & Gilbert. It need scarcely be pointed out that the results of such comparisons can be only approximate and are sub- ject. to a considerable range of error. Only the most decided results one way or the other can be accepted as at all conclusive. In experiments on milch cows the production of milk fat can of course be determined, but the variations in the weight of such an animal often render any conclusions as to gain or loss of body fat so difficult that the results as a whole are less satisfactory than those on fattening. The possible sources of fat in the food, aside from the carbohy- drates, are the ether extract and the proteids. As regards the first, it is certain that not all the digestible ether extract of stock foods is true fat. With the proteids the case is still worse. In particu- lar we now know that a portion, and in some cases a considerable portion, of the total nitrogenous matter of feeding-stuffs consists of non-proteid material, which so far as we know contributes little if anything directly to fat production. This is a very important source of error. Thus the writer * has shown, as has also Soxhlet,t} that if * Manual of Cattle Feeding, p. 182. t Compare Soskin, Jour. f. Landw., 42, 203. THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 173 account be taken of this fact the teachings of Weiske & Wildt’s experiment cited above are exactly reversed and show a formation of fat from carbohydrates. A consideration of the same fact, of course, tends to make the results of all similar experiments, includ- ing those on milch cows, more favorable to the carbohydrates. Still further, it is doubtful whether 100 parts of proteids can actually yield 51.4 parts of fat. The latter number was computed by Henneberg from the elementary composition of proteids and of urea to be the maximum amount obtainable. Zuntz,* however, has called attention to the fact that if the proteids actually split up in the manner which Henneberg’s calculation supposes, the products must contain all the potential energy of the original material, so that none can be given off during their cleavage. This is a process wholly without analogy in the animal body, and, to say the least, very improbable. It would seem then, that even if we still hold to a formation of fat from proteids, we must considerably reduce our estimate of its amount. Later Fattening Experiments.—All these considerations tend to strengthen the belief that fat is formed from carbohydrates, and more recent experiments have demonstrated that such is the fact. Henneberg, Kern, & Wattenberg,f in experiments undertaken to determine the rate of gain and the composition of the increase of fattening sheep, and conducted substantially like those of Lawes & Gilbert on swine, were the first to furnish proof of the formation of fat from carbohydrates by ruminants. Wolff{ having pointed out that their results demonstrated that fact, Henneberg discussed this feature of the experiments in a later publication.§ Regarding all the digested ether extract of the food as pure fat, and assuming that all the digested nitrogenotis matters were true proteids capable of yielding 51.4 per cent. of fat, he obtained the results given on p. 174. Forty-two per cent. more fat was produced than could be accounted for by the fat and proteids of the food, even on the extreme assumptions made. Furthermore, not only did some of the nitrogenous substances of the food undoubtedly consist of non-pro- * Landw. Jahrb., 8, 96. ¢ Jour. f. Landw., 26, 549. t Landw. Jahrb., 8, I. Supp., 269. § Zeit. f Biol , 17, 345. 174 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Proteids, ‘Fat, Grms. Grms. Digested............ 10220 2100 Proteids stored up 936 Proteids available for fat production. 9284 Equivalent fat (51.4 per cent.)....... ia piston se auerarorn te . Meiteate's 4772 Total from fat and proteids...... ee re er eee 6872 Actually produced by animal..............+0eeeeeee aes 9730 teids, but a high figure was assumed for their digestibility, and in computing the gain of fat by the animal no account was taken of the fat of the wool and of the offal. Henneberg’s final conclusion is that no possible errors arising from differences in the animals compared or from irregularities in the consumption of food can explain away the above result. Soxhlet * made similar experiments with swine fattened on rice, that is, on a feeding-stuff poor in proteids and fat and rich in carbo- hydrates, with the result that only 17 to 18 per cent. of the fat pro- duced could be accounted for by the digestible protein and fat of the food. In two experiments with the same species of animal by Tschirwinsky + but 43 per cent. and 28 per cent. respectively of the fat production could be thus accounted for. Of six experiments on geese by B. Schulze,} four, in which a comparatively wide nutri- tive ratio was used, showed that at least from 5 to 20 per cent. of the fat must have been produced from carbohydrates. Chaniewski § likewise experimented on geese and obtatined much more decisive results, from 72 to 87 per cent. of the observed fat production being necessarily ascribed to the carbohydrates. ' Recent experiments by Jordan || have shown that the dairy cow may likewise produce fat from carbohydrates. In the first experi- ment a cow weighing 867 pounds was fed for fifty-nine days with food from which most of the fat had been extracted, the digestible * Bied. Centr. Bl. Ag. Chem., 10, 674. + Landw. Vers. Stat., 29, 317. } Landw. Jahrb., 11, 57. § Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 179. || N. Y. State Experiment Station, Bulls. 132 and 197, THE RELATIONS OF METABOLISM TO FOOD-SUPPLY. 175 protein of the ration being varied from 184 grams to 841 grams per day. During this time she gained 33 pounds in weight, and her whole appearance was such as to negative the assumption of any considerable loss of body fat. In the second experiment one cow was fed a ration poor in fat, one a normal ration, and one a ration unusually rich in fat, the protein supply being again varied through a considerable range. As in the previous case the gain in weight and the general condition of the cows forbade the assumption that body fat was drawn upon to any material extent. In all instances except the last a considerable formation of fat from carbohydrates was shown. The following table gives the more important data of the above experiments: Proven Equiva- | Fat of a Fat, Experimenter. Animal. Moeta- lent Fat,| Food, oe Actually ‘ bolism, Grms. | Grms. Proteids, produced. Grms. Grms. Grms. Henneberg, Kern, & Wattenberg ......... Sheep 9,284 | 4,772 | 2,100 oe as . 3,463 | 1,779 | 300 | 2,0 Soxhlet: AE FOC Sis: a rastauislvayd avers cvauarevous © Souk wa “ahey Sree 143 5 MUTE ae sah ax a ee Shade we esate Pe 128 Loss by body: PrOteltiwsi/ine bate hawaii eee Gay ieawes Bes —24 Hath: chong be tinek oh RMON See oink Baad eee sts —73 Heat production ........... 0... cece cece ee eee Secteps 2379 Balance wii c's Salcim sags deena aw seins 45 eon anaes ita 102 2655 2655 Aside from the loss of 97 Cals. by the body as computed from the carbon and nitrogen balance, all the quantities in the above state- ment represent actual determinations of energy and the account balances within 102 Cals., which is 3.8 per cent. of the total energy of the food or 4.1 per cent. of the computed heat production. To put the matter in a slightly different way, the heat production as computed by Kellner’s method (p.255) from the carbon and nitrogen balance and the energy of food and excreta exceeds by 102 Cals. THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY IN THE ANIMAL BODY. 267 the heat production actually measured by the calorimeter. experiment was one of the two showing the greatest percentage difference between the computed and the observed heat production. In the following statement are tabulated the results of all the ex- periments thus far reported, arranged without regard to the subject of the experiment or the nature of the diet, but divided into two groups according as active muscular work was or was not performed. This Heat. ‘ Gain Production. Difference. Work Body Tene Ga” | Cone. | wb a puted, | served Cal- Per Gala, | Gales | Smee | Benes Rest Experiments « NOs Sp acc eoKelv pee es kee — 97} 2481} 2379} —102)/—4.1 Aa. “dpc ahceaaiiod abeuay siopsion avai gucicns’e —204|} 2434) 2394) — 40/-1.6 EE. i Bievavalin and: ley shevisl ena epesamieala +266) 2361| 2287) — 74;—3.2 OO 1 Diese era hes a aha as aia a +150} 2277| 2309) + 32)4+1.4 © Our osale-piulemanies San aio +159} 2268, 2283} + 15/+0.7 O13 wag page ve eet ee ea +186) 2112) 2151] + 39/41.8 6 14. nceuking ecu sieges FA +158} 2131} 2193) + 62/42.9 Bel 1 naiacaseucan soo an 2-5 Toone ASTER + 70| 2357) 2362} + 5/+0.2 EB NG 2 igs nly setcn, sseilereco wanna alacae + 88) 2336) 2332; — 4/—0.2 BO ONT isis orvawaneaieeg vacua aod +138} 2289} 2276) — 13/—0.6 Oo VB aha sistas as ere oie aes +166) 2367} 2488) +121/+5.1 OO WG ees owes eciee eran y cat +330) 2220) 2279} + 59/+2.7 8 QO cine atiat sae sagas ate +211) 2339) 2303) — 36/—1.5 OO 2 Liaccna ti sagisn axtusnale edna Se —266) 2304) 2279) — 25/—-1.1 Boe DD das dehy aituaes Riau mays +597| 2180) 2258] + 78/+3.6 OO DB aii pastimes ecaackrn Sine Wha + 75| 2216} 2176) — 40/-1.8 CA su 1 eso wesh alts $4 cag siee oot a +571) 2238) 2272) + 34/41.5 Te bcd cee Ua gae es aes S +396} 2242; 2244) + 2/+0.1 2G ikea te wenn cs ee keg eee +213) 2043) 2085) + 42/+2.0 Oe Decco a savatncecataidita Bie Ags EES +187) 2125) 2123) — 2/—0.1 PEP ALD aso s5- ave: ual dsausie: Siaumiae waa? +182) 2067} 2079} + 12/+0.6 TOtaNS ii eevee Se sige aie tes 8 +3525] 47387| 47552] +165)/+0.35 Work Experiments : ING. 1B od sctis wrote erase ces —415| 3829) 3726) —103/—2.7 250 Ber SLE Ss Atel dve Deute7s gree aeons —391} 3901] 3932) + 31/+0.8 186 OD De ant uie e atte ea eden soe —308} 3922; 3927) + 5/+0.1 | 200 ADO sa pacdia ans tease nu Seatanne Matar —255) 3515, 3589} + 74/+2.1 | 255 OBO cay seen e Mae ha eRe Se —234| 3479) 3470; — 9!-0.3 249 BO BM cscs epee tage 2 ae SOG 4 —164| 3439; 3420, — 19/—0.6 249 MOUS O da Sa aicaavaiatnalene ajar > nanan —347| 3573) 3565' — 8]/—0.2 196 ee Oe Ere ,| —451] 3669; 3632) — 37/-1.0| 197 MES SBA aac nie: geass accyetactna nets ase —388|} 3629) 3487) —142)—-1.2 250 Totals a. susie ssteads dieses ae —2953} 32956) 32748} —208/—0.63 2032 Totals, rest and work.......... + 572} 80343] 80300} — 43 Say 268 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. In the former case the observed heat production includes the heat into which the work was converted. The total of all the experiments shows an almost absolute agree- ment between the computed and the observed results. To a trifling extent, however, this arises from a compensation between the rest.. and work experiments, the computed heat tending to be slightly too small in the former and slightly too great in the latter, but the agreement in each series is so close as to amount to a demonstra- tion of the applicability of the law of the conservation of energy to the metabolism of the animal organism. r CHAPTER X. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY—METABOLIZABLE ' ENERGY: Wirx the establishment of the law of the conservation of energy in its application to the animal body, and with the development ‘of the methods of calorimetric research briefly out- lined in Chapter VIII, it has become possible to study success- fully the problems of animal nutrition from a new standpoint, re- garding the food as primarily a source of energy to the body and tracing, to some extent at least, the transformations which that energy undergoes in the organism and particularly the extent to which the latter utilizes it for various purposes. Some data regarding the total energy of foods and their constitu- ents have already been givenin Chapter VIII. It was there pointed out, however, that the total energy, taken by itself, does not fur- nish a measure of the nutritive value of a substance. It is now necessary to enter upon the question of the availability of this energy to the organism. ToTAL AND METABOLIZABLE EneERGy.—The heat of combustion of the food represents to us its total store of potential energy. By no means all of this potential energy, however, is accessible to the organism. A part of what the animal eats is not food at all in a physiological sense, but is simply waste matter which passes through the digestive tract unacted upon. Furthermore, that part of it which is digested and resorbed is not completely oxidized in the body, but gives rise to the formation of excretory products which are still capable of liberating energy by oxidation. We have, there- fore, at the outset, to distinguish between the total, or gross, energy of the food eaten, represented by its heat of combustion, and the portion of that energy which can be liberated and utilized in 269 270 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the organism. It is only this latter portion, of course, of which the body can avail itself, and the term available energy has, therefore, very naturally been proposed for it. As will appear later, however, the terms available and availa- bility may also be employed, and have actually been used, in a more restricted sense to designate that part of the energy of the food which can be applied directly by the organism to purposes other than simple heat production. In order to avoid the confusion of terms thus arising it has been proposed to modify the term available by the words gross and net. The gross available energy, according to this terminology, signifies all of the total energy of the food which can be utilized by the body for any purpose whatever; that is, it is available energy in the first of the two senses defined above. Similarly, the net available energy signifies the available energy in the second sense, or energy available for other purposes than simple heat production. The term “fuel value” has also been employed by some writers, notably by Atwater, to designate the gross available energy. It appears to the writer desirable, however, to avoid the double use of the word available, even with the somewhat awkward modi- fying terms proposed. Strictly speaking, what is meant by gross available energy in the above sense is that portion of the potential energy of the food which the digestive and metabolic processes of the organism can convert into the kinetic form, and its measure, according to the principles enunciated in Chapter VII, is the differ- ence between the potential energy of the food and the potential energy of the various forms of unoxidized matter rejected by the organism. In other words, it is that fraction of the energy of the food which can enter into the metabolism of energy in the body. The writer, therefore, tentatively proposes for it the term metabo- lizable energy, as expressing the facts without any implication as to the uses made by the body of the energy thus metabolized. Metabolizable energy, then, may be briefly defined as potential energy of food minus potential energy of excreta, including under excreta, of course, all the wastes of the body, visible and invisible. The method is analogous to that of the determination of digestibility. In both cases it is a calculation by difference, and the result shows simply the maximum amount of matter or of energy put at the dis- THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 271 posal of the organism without affording any clue to the use made of it by the latter, that is, to its availability in the more restricted sense. In actual investigation, of course, the metabolizable energy of the food is most accurately found by means of direct determinations of the heats of combustion of the food and the waste products. Except in the case of the intestinal gases no serious difficulties stand in the way of these determinations, and with the present im- proved and simplified methods of calorimetry it may fairly be expected that, in exact experiments, at least the energy of the food, feces, and urine will be directly determined, while it is not impossi- ble that more extended investigations than are now available may enable us to make, for different classes of materials, a fairly accurate estimate of the intestinal gases. As results accumulate from such investigations we shall gradually acquire a fund of information regarding the amount of metabolizable energy contained in foods and feeding-stuffs which it is perhaps not chimerical to suppose may one day largely take the place of our present tables of composition and digestibility. Up to the present time, however, but a comparatively small number of experiments upon domestic animals are on record in which the metabolizable energy of the food has been actually determined. In a somewhat larger number of cases the loss of energy in feces and urine has been determined, and in others that in the feces only. . As regards human food the data are somewhat more abundant, but nevertheless by far the greater part of our scientific knowledge of foods and feeding-stuffs is expressed in terms of (conventional) chemical composition and apparent digestibility. If, therefore, we would not forego the advantages which may be anticipated from a study, from the new point of view, of the accumulated results of the last half-century of experimental work in this domain, it is im- portant that we be able to estimate as accurately as may be the metabolizable energy of the food from its known or estimated com- position and digestibility. Not a little labor has been expended upon both aspects of the subject, particularly by Rubner in relation to the carnivora and man, by Atwater and his associates with rela- tion to human nutrition, by Kellner as regards ruminants, and by Zuntz and his associates in the case of the horse. 272 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. § 1. Experiments on Carnivora. The comparative simplicity and completeness of the digestive processes of carnivora, together with the great variations which can be made in their diet, have made them favorite subjects for physio- logical experiments. It is possible to feed a dog or cat on what are close approximations to simple nutrients for a sufficient length of time to permit an accurate determination of the waste products, while with herbivora this is impracticable for obvious reasons. While earlier experimenters, among whom may be mentioned Frankland,* Traube,t and Zuntz,{ have concerned themselves with the question of the energy values of foods and nutrients, it is to the fundamental researches of Rubner that we owe not merely more accurate determinations of metabolizable energy, but in particular a clearer conception of its actual significance in nutrition. Rubner’s experiments § were made chiefly with dogs and were directed toward the determination of what he designates as the physiological heat value of the more important proteid foods, corresponding substantially to what is here called the metabolizable energy. ProTeips.—As regards the non-nitrogenous ingredients of the food, Rubner assumes that, so far as they are digested, their metab- olizable energy is the same as their gross energy, or, in other words, that there are no waste products. For example, if a dog is given a certain amount of starch and none appears in the feces it is assumed that the starch has simply undergone hydration and solution in the digestive tract without material loss of energy and that conse- quently the full amount of energy contained in the starch is avail- able in the resorbed sugar for the metabolism of the body. In herbivora we know that there is a considerable production of gas- eous hydrocarbons by fermentation in the digestive tract. The respiration experiments of Pettenkofer & Voit on dogs, however (compare p. 72), showed but a small excretion of such gases, while Tappeiner || denies the presence of methane in any part of the dog’s alimentary canal. In the case of carnivora, then, the above * Phil. Mag. (4), 82, 182. t Virchow’s Archiv., 29, 414. t Landw. Jahrb., 8, 65. - § Zeit. f. Biol., 21, 250 and 337. || Quoted by Rubner, zbid., 19, 318. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 273 assumption is at least in harmony with current opinion. Rubner’s experiments were therefore directed to the determination of the metabolizable energy of the proteids. The earlier computations of the metabolizable energy of the proteids by Frankland, Traube, Danilewski, and others * were af- fected by two sources of error. First, the heats of combustion as determined by the imperfect calorimetric methods then available were seriously in error. Second, the manner of computing the metabolizable energy from these data has been shown by Rubner to be incorrect. Previous to his investigations the metabolizable energy of the proteids had been very generally computed by deduct- ing from their gross energy the energy of the corresponding amount of urea. In other words, it was assumed that all the nitrogen of the proteids was split off in the form of urea and excreted in the urine, which was accordingly regarded as being practically an aqueous solution of urea, and that the non-nitrogenous residue of the proteids was completely oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Rubner’s results show that this assumption is seriously erroneous and gives too high results for the metabolizable energy. In the first place, it neglects entirely one of the waste products, ‘viz., the feces. The latter are to be regarded in the carnivora, especially on a proteid diet, as a true excretory product. comparable to the organic matter of the urine and containing at most but traces of undigested food. This was early pointed out by Bischoff & Voit + and is now generally admitted by physiologists. (Compare p. 47.) In Rubner’s experiments somewhat over 3 per cent. of the energy of the proteid food was found in the feces. In the second place, Rubner shows that the urine is far from being a simple solution of urea.{ His previous investigations § had shown that the extractives of lean meat, the form of proteid most commonly used in such experiments, pass through the system un- changed and are excreted in the urine, thus increasing its content of energy. By feeding meat previously treated with water to remove * Cf, Rubner, loc. cit., p. 341. + Ernahrung des Fleischfressers, p. 291; compare also Miller, Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 327; Rieder, ibid., 20, 378; Tsuboi, zbid., 85, 68. { Compare Chapter VIII, p. 241. § Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 265. 274 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. these extractives, he demonstrates that in this case also the urine is far from being a simple solution of urea. With a daily excretion of 13.22 grams of total urinary nitrogen, there was found in the urine 0.105 gram of kreatinin, 0.656 gram of cyanuric acid, and an un- determined amount of phenol. The proportion of carbon to nitro- gen in the urine was also notably higher than in urea, viz., 0.523: 1 in place of 0.428:1, or an excess of about 20 per cent. Rubner concludes that the only sure method of ascertaining the amount of potential energy carried off in the urine is the direct determination of its heat of combustion. Accordingly, in the experiments under consideration, the urine was dried on pumice-stone and burned in the calorimeter, a correction being made for the urea decomposed during the drying. Danilewski,* about the same time, also re- ported determinations of the heat of combustion of the dry matter of human urine which, like Rubner’s, show an excess over that computed from the urea present. The materials experimented on by Rubner were prepared lean meat, such as has been commonly used in feeding experiments, and meat with the extractives removed by treatment with water, the gross energy of each being determined by burning the dried material in the calorimeter after having removed the fat by extrac- tion with alcohol and ether.t The prepared material (in the moist state) was fed to dogs for from five to eight days, during all or a portion of which time the feces and urine were collected and their content of nitrogen and energy determined. The amounts fed are not stated, but the percentage of the total nitrogen fed which reappeared in the feces is given. A third experiment on a fasting dog was added in which the urine of the second, third, and fourth days was collected and examined. : So far as the proteids are metabolized in the body all their nitro- gen which does not reappear in the feces will be found in the urine. On this basis the nitrogen per gram of dry proteids metabolized in these «xperiments was divided as shown in the following table. In the case of the fasting animal, Rubner believes himself justified, on the basis of other experiments, in assuming that the nitrogenous tissue * Arch. ges. Physiol., 36, 230. } Subsequent investigations have shown that the material thus prepared still contains traces of fat. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 275 i metabolized had substantially the same composition and heat-value as the lean meat of the first experiment; and the feces are also assumed to be similar. Nitrogen of | Nitrogen of | Nitrogen of Food. Food, Feces, rine, Grms. Grms. Grms. Lean meat ............... 0.1540 0.0024 0.1516 Extracted lean meat ....... 0.1659 0.0023 0.1636 Nothing (body tissue)...... 0.1659 0.0023 0.1636 The energy of the excretory products, calculated per gram of nitrogen, was as follows: Food. Urine, Feces, Cals. Cals. Lean meat ................ 7.450 70.290 Extracted lean meat ....... 6.695 81.515 Nothing. sas:.de gina seein s 8.495 A comparison of the above results for the urine with the energy of urea (5.41 Cals. per gram of nitrogen) fully confirms the conclu- sions already drawn from its chemical composition. From the figures of the last two tables, together with the heats of combustion found for the food consumed, viz., Lean meat, fat removed................ 5.345 Gals. per gram « « extractives and fat removed...5.754 “ “ « we can readily compute the energy of the excreta and by difference the metabolizable energy of the food per gram, as follows: Extracted Nitrogenous Lean Meat. Lean Meat. Body Tissue. Cals, Cals. | Cals. Cals. Cals. Cals. 5.3450 5.7540 5.3450 E OF POOR: oioacy cess erernsdce saree) cae bes 8450}. ..... .7540}...... mee feces 00... 0.22 e eee 0.1683)...... 0.1854)...... 0.1683 “ SUPINE: sis this yas PS aes Gs 1.1294)...... 1.0945)...... 1.2878 Metabolizable energy .......... 4.0473]...... 4.4741) Lisette 3.8889 5.3450 5.3450 5.7540)5.7540 5 3450]5.3450 276 ‘PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Rubner makes a slight correction in the above figures for the energy of hydration and solution. The energy of the proteids was determined in the dry state. They were fed, however, moist, and it is known that an evolution of heat takes place when dry proteids are brought in contact with water. Consequently the potential energy of the moist proteids is less than that computed from the calorimetric results. Rubner estimates this loss (Joc. cit., p. 307) at 0.5 per cent. The urea leaves the body in solution. Its solution in water, however, causes an absorption of heat equal to 2.4 per. cent. of the total energy of the urea, and accordingly (neglecting other organic matter) the heat value of the urine is higher than that calculated from the calorimetric results upon the dried urine. Both these errors tend to make the metabolizable energy appear too great. Rubner’s corrections are as follows: Extracted i | Leet Mont, pe Meat. puiromenous fe Cals. Cals. Metabolizable energy as above ......... 4.0473 4.4741 3.8889 Energy of hydration .................. 0.0269 0.0288 0.0269 OO BONITO gb < cc susas hsp deene rela insets 0.0199 0.0215 0.0199 Corrected metabolizable energy ........ 4.0005 4.4238 3.8421 The energy lost in hydration is, of course, practically a diminu- tion of the gross energy of the food. The energy absorbed in the solution of the urea can be regarded either as a part of the energy of the excreta or as being a part of the general expenditure of energy by the body in internal work. (See the next chapter.) Rubner * has also computed the metabolizable energy of a num- ber of proteids for which direct determinations are wanting. For this purpose he uses the results of Stohmann + for the gross energy and assumes. first, that the nitrogen will be divided between feces and urine in the same ratio as in the experiment on extracted lean meat, and second, that the energy of these excretory products per gram of nitrogen will be the same as in that experiment. He thus obtains the following results: * Loc. cit., p. 351. { Landw. Jahrb., 18, 513. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 277 Baek Stas wee in raya acca Nitrogen. | PerGea.,| eto.” | Per Grime als. Cals. Cals. Paraglobulin 15.6 5.634 1.263 4.371 Egg albumin 15.7 5.577 1.270 4.307 Case asic tesa oa hens ae Pe Gee 5 15.2 5.715 1.311 4.404 POYMEOMIN 5s ssce cists aeacaven dss leanieia anne 16.6 5.754 1.329 4.424 WIDTD) 56 022k Vadnais» wed ode 16.6 5.508 1.329 4.179 Lean meat ...............0 ee eee 15.4 5.345 1.345 4.000 Conglutin os oa disie es ss saci aa ave 17.5 5.359 1.390 3.969 Crystallized albumin ............ 19.2 5.595 1.555 4.090 Nitrogenous body tissue ......... 15.4 5.345 1.503 3.842 § 2. Experiments on Man. Protrein.—Rubner * has also reported a single experiment on a man upon a diet of meat with a slight addition of fat. The results, expressed in the same manner as those given in the preceding sec- tion, that is, per gram of dry matter of the meat, were— Energy of food. ..... 0... ccc eee ence ecw 5.599 Cals, te ACCES. ciexe ws . 0.484 Cals. 6 OF UPNE sei ecccae sees 1.027 Metabolizable energy....... .. 4.1388 “ 5.599 “ 5.599“ Quite a number of determinations are on record of the ratio be- tween the nitrogen and the energy content of human urine. Rub- ner { reports the following results upon various diets, including the experiment on meat just quoted: Diet. mW Mother’s milk... .......0 0. cece eee cee 12.10 Cals. Cow’s milk—infant. ........c0. cece eee eee 6.93 te & —adult.........2006 ee were gia ehees 7.71 & Mixed diet, poor in fat. . ies Vbaseewecs Gor. 28 OG Ey OE ac hve Late Nr eects oho Sap 7 Suge. & “rich in fat........... Oe oe 8.87 CO A ao cigs 6h ig guests eseleads\ uber 8.44 “ 2 |, ne eee. 6.42 « Mixed diet—boy........-.. cs. ceeeeeeeseeseees 1.50 MOSES ccc o cca cade BPH OR ESS waver Te09 Potatoes. . SO Mem eta i aesaslesndies 7.85 * * Zeit. b ‘Biol, 42, 272. 7} Ibid., p. 302. 278 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. With the exception of the mother’s milk, the results show but a slightly greater range than those on the dog. The results of Atwater & Benedict,* cited on p. 242, when computed per gram of nitrogen, give the following results: Experiment No. 5............2404. 7.055 Cals. MP Badin actesiteete es 7.839 “ ee Teh tec aedn asi Sen eoeeda 8.060 “ _ ae eee ee ee ee eee 8.447 “ : Gi ease cei ehepmanet 8.326 “ 10. camry sana eeenee 7.575 “ The same authors report { the average of 46 determinations as 7.9 Cals. per gram of nitrogen. Tangl { has reported materially higher figures, especially for diets containing large amounts of carbohydrates and fat. In the case of a mixed diet more or less of the potential energy of the feces may be: derived from the non-nitrogenous nutrients ‘of the food, and we should hardly be justified in making for these experiments a computation like that made for the meat diet. The rather small range of the figures in most cases, however, would seem to show that the metabolizable energy of the proteids of ordi- nary mixed dietaries is substantially the same as that found by Rubner for carnivora. Tangl’s results perhaps suggest the possi- bility of the occasional presence in human urine of non-nitrogenous matters similar to those found so abundantly in that of ruminants. Rvusner’s CompuTatTions.—Rubner’s earlier researches did not include experiments upon man, but from the results given in the foregoing section he endeavored to compute approximate factors for the metabolizable energy of the mixed diet of man.§ For this purpose he estimates that, on the average, 60 per cent. of the pro- tein of the diet is derived from animal sources and 40 per cent. from vegetable. For the animal protein he uses the value found above for lean meat, and for vegetable protein the average of the values for syntonin and fibrin (since these have an ultimate composition * U.S. Dept. Agr., Office of Experiment Stations, Bull. 69. t Report Storrs Expt. Station, 1899, p. 100. t Arch. f. (Anat. u.) Physiol., 1899, 261. § Loc. cit., p. 370. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 279 similar to that of the proteids of the grains). Correcting these values for the error involved in the usual computation of protein from nitrogen, he obtains as the average metabolizable energy of the protein (N X 6.25) of a mixed diet 4.1 Cals. per gram. For the fat and carbohydrates it is assumed that all their poten- tial energy is metabolizable, but an allowance is made in the latter case for the error due to the ordinary computation of the carbo- hydrates by difference and for some minor sources of uncertainty. Rubner’s final averages are— Protein (N X6.25)......... 4.1 Cals. per gram. Pati cacciiicatedetauatedd Q.3: fe oe Carbohydrates... .......... 7 a The value for protein, by the method of computation, includes an allowance for the metabolic products contained in, the feces, but neither it nor the values for the other nutrients include any estimate for the loss through imperfect digestion. In other words, they refer to the digested nutrients. These figures were designed expressly for computing the metab- olizable energy of human dietaries, and even for that purpose are confessedly only approximations. In the absence of more exac figures, however, they have been somewhat extensively used for computing the metabolizable energy of the digested portion of the food of domestic animals. For purposes of approximate estimates such a use of them was perhaps justifiable, but in too many cases their origin seems to have been forgotten and a degree of accuracy ascribed to them which they do not possess. As will be shown presently, later investigations have yielded materially different results for the metabolizable energy of the several classes of nutri- ents in the fuod of herbivorous animals. Later Experiments.—Quite recently Rubner * has published the results of some experimental investigations into the validity of the averages or “standard figures” given above. In these experiments the weights and heats of combustion of food, feces, and urine were determined calorimetrically and the metabolizable energy as ob- tained from these data was compared with that computed by the use of the above factors. In making the latter calculation an allowance * Zeit. f. Biol., 42, 261. 280 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. was made for the percentage loss in the feces equal to that observed in the actual experiment. The results for the metabolizable energy per day were— From Z Calorimetric Computed, Diet. Data, Cals. Cals. Potatoes: OMY sic sevice s cacavaes wees 1911.4 1911.5 Rye bread, bolted flour .................. 2060.4 2079.3 a « “unbolted flour................ 1773.1 1758.6 Mixed diet, poor in fat.................-- 2400.5 2376.0 rich, ewan seated 8 aes 2698.8 2600.0 ++ ww edebaiyee fh) BS] Bf Mixed diet—growing boys............ { _ tenes aes _ As above noted, the computed results include a deduction for the energy of the undigested matter in the feces. Rubner finds that the heat of combustion of the organic matter of the latter varies but little even on extremes of diet, so that the loss through this. channel is approximately proportional to the amount of the ex- cretion. In the experiments on mixed diet the percentage loss of energy in the feces varied from 4.3 per cent. to 7.9 per cent. of the energy of the food. ATWATER’s INVESTIGATIONS.—By far the most extensive data as to the metabolizable energy of human foods and dietaries are those derived from the investigations upon human nutrition made under Atwater’s direction by the United States Department of Agriculture with the codperation of Wesleyan University, the Storrs Experiment Station, and various other experiment sta- tions. Atwater & Bryant * have summarized these results in a preliminary report of which the essential features are given in the following paragraphs. From the best data available, the heats of, combustion of the protein, carbohydrates, and fats of various classes of foods are esti- mated. In these estimates account is taken as fully as possible of the proportion of nitrogen in proteid and non-proteid forms, and of the varying percentage of nitrogen in different proteids, the nitro- gen factors used being those quoted on p. 6. The accuracy of * Report Storrs Agr. Expt Station, 1899, p. 73. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 281 these estimates is checked by a comparison of the computed with the actual heats of combustion of 276 different samples of food, the average results showing a close agreement. Assuming the potential energy of the urine to be all derived from the proteids, the average of 7.9 Cals. per gram nitrogen given above (p. 278) corresponds to 1.25 Cals. per gram of protein (N X6.25) metabolized. The loss of energy in the feces is estimated from a number of digestion experi- ments upon single foods, the results being checked by a comparison of the actual and computed apparent digestibility in 93 digestion experiments on mixed diet. Finally, the proportions of the several nutrients which are derived from different classes of foods in average mixed diets are computed from the results of 185 dietary studies. The final results thus obtained for the metabolizable energy or “fuel value” of the nutrients are shown in the table on page 282. The average results for the ordinary mixed diet of man were— Protein........... 22. -eeeeeeee eee 4.0 Cals. per gram ‘Carbohydrates.................. 40 “& “ « Fat... Capes eesenOed sh AE ORE These factors are smaller than those proposed by Rubner, largely because they relate to the total and not to the digested nutrients. Comparisons of the computed with actual metabolizable energy of mixed dietaries, using the factors of the above table, gave concor- dant results. § 3. Experiments on Herbivora. Tue Mécxern Investications.—The larger share of our present knowledge regarding the metabolizable energy of the food of her- bivora is due to the investigations upon mature cattle which have been made by Kellner * since 1894 at the Méckern Experiment Station. In the earlier series of experiments (including those by G. Kihn, reported by Kellner ¢) additions of commercial wheat gluten and of starch were made to a basal ration consisting exclu- sively of coarse fodder (hay or straw). In the later series of ex- periments additions of the same substances and of oil and beet molasses on the one hand, and of coarse fodders on the other hand, were made to a mixed basal ration. * Landw. Vers. Stat., 47, 275; 50, 245; 58, 1. ft Ibid., 44, 257. 282 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Nutrients Propet Total Fuel Value. Kistohmesd |e) Gen gt | Metal | cer Ge Material. Group cer ion: Der paring in Acvall- | Per Gra. mate ; : 100 Grms.| Grm. seers able Nu- veneele Nutri- Total. Fable. trients. utrients. ents. Protein: Grms. Cals. |PerCent.| Cals. Cals. Cals. Meats, fish, ete ...] 43.0 5.65 97 5.50 4.40 4.25 BS) aireosiiciace dbereoe 6.0 5.75 97 5.60 4.50 4.35 Dairy products . 12.0 5.65 97 5.50 4.40 4.25 _.* Animal food....| 61.0 5.65 97 5.50 4.40 4.25 Cereals: icccucmies 31.0 5.80 85 4.95 4.55 3.70 Legumes.......... 2.0 5.70 78 4.45 4.45 3.20 Vegetables ....... 5.5 5.00 83 4.15 3.75 2.90 Fruits ........... 0.5 5.20 85 4.40 3.95 3.15 Vegetable food .| 39.0 | ‘5.65 85 | 4.80 | 4.40 | 3.55 Total food ..... 100.0 5.65 92 5.20 4.40 4.00 Fat: Meat and eggs....| 60.0 9.50 95 9.00 9.50 9.00 Dairy products ...| 32.0 9.25 95 8.80 9.25 8.80 Animal food....}| 92.0 9.40 95 8.95 9.40 8.95 Vegetable food .| 8.0 9.30 90 8.35 9.30 8.35 Total food ..... 100.0 9.40 95 8.90 9.40 8.90 Carbohydrates : ‘ Animal food....}| 5.0 3.90 98 3.80 3.90 3.80 Cereals .......... 55.0 4.20 98 4.10 4.20 4.10 Legumes.......... 1.0 4.20 97 4.05 4.20 4.05 Vegetables ....... 13.0 4.20 95 4.00 4.20 4.00 Fruits ........... 5.0 4.00 90 3.60 4.00 3.60 Sugars........... 21.0 3.95 98 3.85 3.95 3.85 Vegetable food .| 95.0 4.15 97 4.00 4.15 4.00 Total food ..... 100.0 4.15 97 4.00 4.15 4.00 In each experiment the digestibility of the ration was deter- mined in the usual manner, and also the carbon of food, feces, urine, and respiration (including methane, etc.), and the nitrogen and heats of combustion of food, feces, and urine. The experiments were made with every precaution and extended over a sufficient length of time to ensure normal results. respiratory products were determined in four or five separate periods of twenty-four hours each. No such complete experiments with In each experiment the THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 283, other classes of herbivorous animals have been reported, although . partial data are available from experiments on horses and swine. MetHop or Sratinc Resutts.—The determination of the metabolizable energy of a given ration by experiments like the- above is, in principle, very simple, although requiring many appli- ances and much technical skill. When, however, we attempt to generalize the results much greater difficulties are encountered than in the cases previously considered. In investigations upon carnivora and upon man the metaboliz- able energy, as we have just seen, is usually computed upon the total nutrients of the food—that is; upon the total amounts of. protein, carbohydrates, and fat—the deduction for the loss of energy in the feces being included in the factors employed. This is possible because the amount of potential energy thus removed is small in itself and subject to relatively small variations on ordi- nary diet and also because the crude nutrients composing the food are largely chemical penIpOUnes which are at least fairly well known. The food of herbivora, on the contrary, is both more complex and less well known chemically and contains a much larger and very varying proportion of indigestible matter. As a consequence the feces, instead of being chiefly an excretory product, consist mainly of undigested food residues with but a small proportion of meta- bolic products, and contain a large and variable part of the total potential energy of the food. For all these reasons it seems likely that any attempt to compute general factors for the metab- olizable energy of the crude nutrients of feeding-stuffs similar to those of Rubner or Atwater for the nutrients of human foods would be confronted by almost insuperable difficulties. It was natural, then, to attempt to eliminate these difficulties by computing the results upon the digestible nutrients of the feed- ing-stuffs, but even here considerable difficulties arise. The di- gested nutrients, particularly in the case of coarse fodders, are far from being the pure protein, carbohydrates, and fats which our ordinary statements of composition and digestibility assume them to be. Furthermore, a considerable and a variable proportion of the waste.of proteid metabolism in the herbivora takes the form of hippuric acid, a body less completely oxidized than urea, and ac- 284 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. cordingly containing more potential energy, while the urine of sheep and cattle also contains not a little non-nitrogenous matter of some sort. Finally, the slow and complicated process of diges- tion in the herbivora is accompanied by fermentations and the evolution of gaseous hydrocarbons (methane), and perhaps of hydrogen, both of which carry off a more or less variable propor- tion of the potential energy of the food. By means of experiments with approximately pure nutrients it is possible to secure factors for the metabolizable energy of the digested nutrients of con- centrated feeding-stuffs, but in the case of coarse fodders about all that is practicable in this direction is to compute the results of experiments upon the total digestible matter. There is possible, however, a third method, viz., to compute the metabolizable energy upon the total organic matter of the feeding- stuff, expressing it either as Calories per gram or pound of organic matter or as a percentage of the gross energy. In the latter form the result would be analogous to a digestion coefficient and would show what proportion of the total energy of the material, as: deter- mined by combustion in the calorimeter, was capable of being met- abolized in the body. This method of expressing the results has certain advantages in directness and simplicity, and especially in putting the whole matter on the basis of energy values. In the succeeding paragraphs the available data will be considered from both the standpoints last named. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF ORGANIC MATTER. For a discussion of the matter from this standpoint we have to rely almost entirely upon the Méckern investigations already men- tioned. In the case of those earlier experiments in which the ration consisted exclusively of a single coarse fodder the computation of the metabolizable energy of the latter is, of course, readily made. In the experiments in which the food under investigation was added to a basal ration the computation is somewhat less simple, it being then necessary to compare the gross energy of the added food with the increase in the energy of the excreta in the second period as compared with the first. The details of both methods will be best explained by illustration. THE FOOD AS’ A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 285 Total Organic Matter. Coarse Fodders, Frep ALonr.—For Ox H, fed exclusively on meadow hay, Kellner obtained the following results * per day and head: Ingesta. ; 7,263T grams meadow hay......... 32,177.3 Cals. Excreta. 2,547 ¢ grams feces....... -11,750.3 Cals. 13,675 “ urine....... 1,945.0 “ 158.4 “ methane..... 2,113.7 “ Total excreta......................... 15,809.0 “ Difference: ..siei2s 2s eeee aan es erent 16,368.3 “ Had the ration exactly sufficed for the maintenance of the ani- mal, the difference of 16,368.3 Cals. would represent exactly its metabolizable energy. In reality, however, the nitrogen and car- bon balance indicated a gain by the animal of 37.2 grams of protein (N X6.00 {) and 140.8 grams of fat, equivalent to 1548.8 Cals., so that the amount of energy actually converted into the kinetic form was 16,368.3 — 1548.8 =14,819.5 Cals. The potential energy of the 140.8, grams of fat, however; while it was not actually rendered kinetic, might have been had.the needs of the organism required it. Its retention in the potential form was, in a’sense, temporary and accidental, and its energy should properly be considered as a part of the metabolizable energy of the food.. With the gain of protein, however, the case is different. Its total potential energy equals 211.2 Cals., but not all of this is capable of conversion into kinetic energy. According to Rubner’s results (p.275) each gram of urinary nitrogen derived from the met- abolism of the protein of lean meat corresponds to 7.45 Cals. If this result is applicable to the forms of protein consumed by her- bivora (and we shall see later that there is good reason to believe that such is approximately the case), then the metabolism of the 37.2 grams of protein gained would have added 46.2 Cals. to the observed potential energy of the urine, while the remaining 165 Cals. would have taken the kinetic form and should, therefore, be regarded as part of the metabolizable energy of the food. * Loc. cit., 58, 9. t+ Dry matter. t¢ Compare pp. 67, 68. 286 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. In other words, to get at the actual metabolizable energy of the ration in this experiment we must add to the observed potential energy of the urine the amount of 46.2 Cals. by which it would have been increased had all the protein of the food been metabolized, or, what is the same thing, must subtract this amount from the ob- served difference between food and excreta. ‘This leaves 16,322.1 Cals. as the metabolizable energy of 7263 grams of dry matter or 6750 grams of organic matter in meadow hay, and the metabolizable energy per gram of organic matter is therefore 2.418 Cals. Computed in the above manner, the several experiments of this category gave per day and head the following results: q Metabolizable | 3 Energy of ierege | 2 iB 3% Ani- ‘ 3 a] per mal: as =E Urine | meth- ce @| Food. | Feces. | (Cor- |°2" | Total;,| 07; ‘g | Cals. -/ Cals. | rected). or" | Cals.” | Fame a Cals. haat oot A Rasta ‘ to ang oT ter, 6 Cals. 32177 .3|11750.3|1991:2 |2113.7|16322- 112.418 A | Meadow hay I I ey ‘A 36975 .1/15524 1/1925 .7*/3137 . 2116388 . 112.097. Vv n fe Bins 34211 .5/15312.2/1559 | 3*/2268 .5|15071 5/2093 VI “ nee 33855 .4|13765 . 2/1737 .9*|2480 .6|15871 .7|2.228 XX if “ M.: 37167 .3113880 .7/3224.6 12646.1/17415.9'2.230- L sh “IL. 32252 .2/14669 .0/1686.9 |2092.3/13804.0)/2.026 Rica, RTS O AAT aicas epiare [iecornid gute! [e Bavancotee favs Ont are Sarcioe sl wena {2.182 B | Meadow hay and oat straw. -17107|33794 .4|14576 .1)1440.3 |2331.2/15446.8/2.173 WI |Clover ° « . .|7328/34603 . 2|15505 . 1/1549 . 6*/2670 114878 .412 031 IV : ps @ os), ,17074)33405 .1/15250.6/1481 . 5*/2491 .3)14181 . 7/2004 * Energy of urine computed from its carbon content. It should be noted that the figures for the energy of the feces in these and in all the succeeding experiments include that of the met- abolie products contained in them. While the latter are not derived directly from the food they are a part of the expenditure made by the body in the digestion of the food, and there is. therefore, the same reason for including their energy as for including that of the organic matter of the urine. Both contain a certain amount of potential energy, derived ultimately from the food, which has escaped being metabolized in THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 287 the body and so is to be deducted from the total energy of the food to obtain its metabolizable energy. Experiments on timothy hay made by the writer,* in which the amount of methane excreted was estimated from the amount of non- nitrogenous nutrients digested, gave the following results, the cor- rection for the gain or loss of nitrogen being computed in a slightly different way from that explained above: ENERGY PER GRAM ORGANIC MATTER. Experiment I. | Experiment II./Experiment VI. Cals Cals. Cals. Steen Teese ws vans weed ce Gestcnoos 2.104 1.838 2.139 Boe Dice Oa ontsiah atte Beek SRD Shag 2.007 2.164 2.175 OD Baer aaen Gnd Oe Male eset iah 1.904 1.824 2.176 AVETARGS Jround genni ames 2.005 1.942 2.163 Average of all............. 2 037 It should be noted that the above figures are, as already stated, approximate only. The energy of the methane was estimated, while the determinations of the energy of the urine were not, in all cases, satisfactory. We are probably justified, however, in regarding the results as a close approximation to the truth. Coarsk FoppErs ADDED To BasaL Ration.—As an example of this class of experiments we may take Periods 4 and 7 with Ox H.+ The rations in the two periods were as follows: Total Weight. Containing Organic Matter. Period 4, | Period 7, | Period 4, | Period 7, | Difference, Kgs. gs. Grms. Grmg. TMs. Meadow hay .............. or) a 8 3198 6495 3297 Molasses-beet pulp ........ 3 3 2386 2413 27 Peanut meal............-. 1 1 818 835 17 8 | 12 6402 | 9743 | 3341 * Penna State Experiment Station, Bull 42, p. 153. { Loc. cit., 53, 278-335. 288 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The potential energy of food and excreta (that of the urine cor- rected to nitrogen equilibrium) and by difference the amounts of metabolizable energy were: Urine Metaboliz- Food, Feces, Methane, Cals. Cais. | (Corested), | "Cais, | able Bneray. Period 7........ 46,275.0 | 14,104.8 2,593 .0 3,564.2 | 26,013.0 OO, sleuvicaiasn 30,338 .1 8,574.9 1,795.0 2,579.4 | 17,388.8 Difference ....| 15,936.9 5,529.9 798.0 984.8 8,624.2 The metabolizable energy of the additional 3341 grams of or- ganic matter eaten in Period 7 was therefore 8624.2 Cals. This added food was intended to consist of hay, but the unavoidable variations in the moisture content of the feeding-stuffs resulted in a slightly greater consumption of the other ingredients of the ration also. Of the 3341 grams of additional organic matter, 3297 grams, as the previous table shows, were from the hay and 44 grams from the basal ration. If, then, we would ascertain the metabolizable energy of the added hay only, we must subtract from the difference of 8624.2 Cals. between the two rations the metabolizable energy of this 44 grams of organic matter from the other feeding-stuffs. But while the gross energy of the latter is known, its metabo- lizable energy cannot be computed exactly, since it is impossible to determine what part of the energy of the excreta was derived from this particular portion of the ration. By assuming, however, that the same percentage of its gross energy was metabolizable as was the case with the basal ration, and that its non-metabolizable energy was similarly distributed between the various excreta, we may compute a correction which, although not strictly accurate, will not, in view of the small quantities involved, introduce any serious error. In this case the gross energy of the 3297 grams of organic matter in the added hay was 15,728.6 Cals., and the table takes the form shown on the opposite page. As thus computed, the metabolizable energy of the 3297 grams of organic matter added to the basal ration in the form of hay was 8504.8 Cals., equal to 2.580 Cals. per gram. The total correction amounts to 119.4 Cals., and even a considerable relative error in it would not materially change the final results. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 289 Food, F 7 Urine Methane, Metaboliz- Cals. Cals.” | (Corrected), | Cais’ | able Energy, Period 7........ 46,275.0 | 14,104.8 | ~ 2,593.0 3,564.2 | 26,013.0 see. Ceara 30,338 .1 8,574.9 1,795.0 2,579.4 | 17,388.8 Difference....| 15,936.9 5,529.9 798.0 984.8 8,624.2. Correction ....| —208.3 —58.9 —12.3 -17.7 —119.4 15,728 .6 5,471.0 785.7 967.1 8,504.8 Percentagés. . . 100.0 34.78 5.00 6.15 54.07 In these computations it is assumed that the increased metabo- lizable energy of the ration is derived entirely from the added feed- ing-stuff, or, in other words, that the latter exerted no influence either upon the digestibility of the basal ration or upon the propor- tion of its energy lost in urine and in hydrocarbons. That such is the case we have no means of proving, and it is, indeed, unlikely that it is exactly true. The metabolizable energy of the added feeding-stuff as above computed includes any such effects—that is, it represents the net result to the organism of the added coarse fodder. Table I of the Appendix contains the results of all the experi- ments of this sort, computed in the manner illustrated above. It will be noted that in all but two cases the correction is less than in the above example. In each case the table shows also the per- centage of the gross energy of the feeding-stuff which was found to be metabolizable and the percentage carried off in each of the excreta, Summary.—The results of the foregoing determinations of the metabolizable energy of the organic matter of coarse fodders are summarized in the table on page 290, which shows the gross and metabolizable energy per gram of organic matter and also the percentage of gross energy found to be metabolizable. Concentrated Feeding-stuffs.—The metabolizable energy of the organic matter of a concentrated feeding-stuff when added to a basal ration can, of course, be computed by the same method as in the case of added coarse fodders, but, as we shall see, some special difficulties arise in its application. The only commercial concentrated feeding-stuff upon which such experiments have been reported is beet molasses, although 290 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Per Gram Organic atter. ; Per Cent. Gross, Metabolis- Metabalis. Cals. | Energy, Meadow Hay: z in - Sample t. achaneinuhe, « avate nates aS Osan 4.767 2.418 50.72 s cist Satie ice Soraviseah vo senesiguehse iecepeitas OG (ob tee 4.731 2.097 44 32 EB, ORV acs eiaecres Solenoid aire 2.093 44.06 «®p Oy ancien ee ete } 4.752 | 2.228 | 46.88 * By BVETARC ss vs cues ee ted nee gare |hs wads ees 2.161 45.47 SE IME ews anc oa eee ee go shonee ne 4.760 | 2.230. | 46.86 (C0 TD gaa ee atew ne Pp gauaaale Siew ese ae 4.734 |. 2.026 42.80 “ Vi, Ox Fi... facinating 743 | 1-983 || 40.75 © Ne YO Gisscamaces iawn make aay re tae | 2.087 | .44.00 se VV, average..... 2... eee eet tea le mal 12.010 |. 42:38 - «VI, Ox H, Period 2 2.520 52.82 g VI, oy H, siairreraxt 2 a <6 2.580 -54.07 # vi EDs aiaasese hsavsder a iene’ Diktacsiee F 2.540 53.24 «VI, average..... Soe puesunaas | wheeacene i 2.547 53.38 Average of seven samples ............ 4,751 2.213 46.56 Timothy Hay (approximate) .............. 4.670 2.037 43.62 OnE 1.760 | 36.54 Piel Soca extras antaas tsa aad setae nie eee .76 : Oi a, ocd simon Seana Soe SAS 4.16 { 1.688 | 35.05 Averagescc sia eesededa Geeks eteeridess 1.724 35.80 ba ce ae 1.411 29.75 XK Hivises-ca neat iatee sete ss ped eA ES : ; le ee ieee 4.743 | 11540: | 32.47 AV ETERS jac wanit advan Ween eee eho on ee ees 1.475 31.11 Espacee Rye Straw: : = Por ee oe re eke eee 3.26 6. AG Ah vee eoltn eee ana satan er cieeeee 4.251 | 3.164 | 74.45 Ue eee te ere ee eer ry al ee 3.213 | 75.58 experiments were also made by Kellner with wheat gluten, starch, oil, and extracted straw, the aim of which was to determine the metabolizable energy of the various digestible nutrients. As an illustration of this class of experiments we may take one upvn molasses with Ox F,* comparing Period 3, on the basal ration, * Loc, cit., 58, 172-227, THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 291 with Period 6, on the same ration with the addition of molasses. Comparing, first, the organic matter of the two rations we have the following: Total Organic Organic Matter in Matter Fed, Molasses, . Grms. Grms. Period 6 4.esis-c ais een dromad eau sans 8262 1702 eee BL aisle Soave ah gualdid caked axdasee gee 6630 0 1632 1702 In the period with molasses 70 grams less of the basal ration was consumed than in the period without, and a correction must accordingly be made for this in the way explained on page 288. The energy of food and excreta in the two experiments (that of the urine being corrected to nitrogen equilibrium), together with the correction for the 70 grams of organic matter, is shown in the following table: aaa F Metaboliz- Gets | Ge | TEaR | MGARR |abtedEperey, Period 6........ 37,946.2 | 11,365.8 | 1,786.1 | 2,397.9 | 22,396.4 SOBs Aesth Bt 31,327 .8 9,599 .2 1,530.0 2,560.7 .| 17,637.9 6,618.4 1,766.6 256.1 —162.8 4,758.5 Correction ....| +330.8 +101.3 '+16.2 + 27.0 +186.3 6,949.2 | 1,867.9 ' 272.3 | 135.8 | 4,944.8 Dividing the metabolizable energy of the molasses, 4944.8 Cals., by the number of grams consumed, 1702, gives the metabolizable energy of 1 gram of organic matter as 2.905 Cals. ReaL AND APPARENT METABOLIZABLE ENERGy.—The above figures, however, demand more critical discussion. While the addi- tion of molasses to the basal ration increased the amount of poten- tial energy carried off in the feces and urine, it diminished that in the methane; that is, it acted in some way to check the fermen- tation in the digestive tract to which this gas owes its origin. In other words, under the influence of the molasses the loss of energy by fermentation of the basal ration was diminished by 135.8 Cals., and this amount, by the method of computation, is added to the metabolizable energy of the molasses. 292 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Moreover, the loss of energy in the feces is a complex of sev- eral factors. The amounts of organic matter and of the several nutrients excreted in the feces in the two periods (not corrected for the 70 grams difference in organic matter consumed) were as follows: Organic | protein, | Crude Nitrogen Crude iter. | Tem | Ge a | I = (61: hs ee 2132 403 595 1068 66 OTB osnctee aconbrnade ainesvtered 1797 284 527 924 62 Difference..............- 335 119 68 144 | 4 In addition to protein and nitrogen-free extract, which may possibly represent indigestible material in the molasses, the feces contained 68 grams more crude fiber and 4 grams more fat in Period 6 than in Period 3. These cannot have been derived from the molasses, since the latter does not contain these ingredients. This feeding-stuff, in other words, diminished the apparent digestibility of the fiber and fat of the basal ration. As a matter of fact, the ingredients of molasses being practically all soluble in water, it is probable that. nearly all the difference in the amount digested is due to the diminished apparent digestibility of the basal ration under the influence of the molasses. The figure above given for the metabolizable energy includes all these effects; that is, it shows the net result as regards energy ob- tained from molasses fed under the conditions of these experiments, the nutritive ratio of the basal ration being 1 : 5.8 and that of the molasses ration 1:6.4. To get at the actual amount of energy set free from the molasses itself we should need to subtract from the metabolizable energy as calculated above the energy corresponding to the decreased excretion of methane and to add to it the metabo- lizable energy corresponding to the decrease in the amounts of crude fiber and ether extract digested, assuming that all the excess of protein and nitrogen-free extract in the feces was derived from the molasses. Computed in this way * the real metabolizable energy * One gram of crude fiber = 3.3 Cals., and one gram of ether extract = 8.3 Cals. See p. 332. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 293 of the organic matter is 2.977 Cals. per gram. This would be a mini- mum figure, while if we assume, as suggested above, that the mo- lasses is entirely digestible, this figure is still too low and should be increased to equal the gross energy of the organic matter. If, however, either one of these latter values were used in com- puting the metabolizable energy of rations, the results would obvi- ously be too high unless corrections were made for the effect upon the apparent digestibility of the other feeding-stuffs in the ration. The figure first computed, while including several different effects, nevertheless seems better adapted for use in actual computations under average conditions, while the second gives the more accurate idea of the store of metabolizable energy contained in the feeding- stuff regarded by itself. The distinction is analogous to that between apparent and real digestibility, and we may accordingly speak of the apparent and the real metabolizable energy of feeding- stuffs, The whole of our present discussion of the metabolizable energy of the organic matter (total or digestible) of food materials relates to the apparent metabolizable energy. This is obvious as regards the concentrated feeds from the above example, and logic- ally applies also to those cases in which coarse fodders were added to the basal ration, while in the case of the coarse fodders used alone the distinction vanishes or is reduced to one between apparent and real digestibility. The experiment with beet molasses well illus- trates the difficulties in the way of determining the actual metabo- lizable energy of feeding-stuffs which cannot be used alone. Beet Motasses.—In two later experiments the addition of molasses increased instead of diminishing the excretion of methane. The results of the three experiments upon molasses, computed in the same manner as the experiments upon coarse fodders, are con- tained in Table II of the Appendix. In the last two experiments 10 to 12 per cent. of the energy of the molasses was lost in the products of intestinal fermentation, but this was more than counterbalanced by its less effect upon the digestibility of the rations, so that the final result is a higher figure for the apparently metabolizable energy than in the first experi- ment. Summarizing the results per gram as in the case of the coarse foddeis we have: 294 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. : A st, ro Metabolizable Per Cent Cals.’ oe Metabolizable. 2.905 71.16 “3.308 79.00 3.044 : 72.70 3.176 75.85 Srarcu.—In a considerable number of the trials commercial starch was added to the basal ration. The earlier experiments by Kiihn were intended primarily to throw light on the possible for- mation of fat from carbohydrates (compare p. 177). In them, starch was added to a ration of coarse fodder only and the nutritive ratio was purposely made very wide, the result being that more or less of the starch escaped digestion. In the later experiments by Kellner the starch was added to a mixed ration. Except in the first two experiments the nutritive ratio was a medium one and but traces of starch escaped digestion. It will be convenient, therefore, to tabulate these two classes of experiments separately, as has been done in Tables IIT and IV of*the Appendix, the com- putations being made as in the previous cases. The same remarks which were made on p. 291 concerning the distinction between real and apparent metabolizable energy apply to these results. As computed they represent the net gain to the organism from the consumption of starch and are the algebraic sum of several factors. In particular, there was a considerable loss of energy in the feces, even in the later experiments in which but traces of the starch itself escaped ‘digestion. In other words, the starch either lowered the digestibility of the basal ration or in- creased the formation of fecal metabolic products or both. The method of computation adopted virtually looks upon this as part of the necessary expenditure in the digestion of the starch. On the other hand, there are severdl cases in which there was a de- crease in the outgo of potential energy in the urine, even after the results are corrected to nitrogen equilibrium. This, from our pres- ent point of view, is credited to the starch and increases its apparent metabolizable energy. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 295 The results on starch, expressed in Calories per gram of organic matter, may be summarized as follows: Apparent Gross Metaboliz- | Per Cent. Energy, able Metaboliz- Cals. Energy, able. Cals. Kithn’s Experiments : Sample 1, Ox ET icsanas a tae ge akin oan 4.249 3.029 71.21 DV ies syste oetnacaietay pace iararesease: 4.249 2.705 63.71 Average.. HIgkennag eee La BRT Me aS 4.249 2.867 67.46 -‘Sample II, Ox V, Period 2a............. 4.236 3.347 78.95 - > OE EE DD iacesied we plasuan des 4.236 3.161 74.68 a : MEG Se? S2 bas ieee gration 4.236 3.018 | 71.26 ii a ee ree iacise eo 4.236 2.964 69.98 AV OPA OL fein asstesinusutues sictonsnd Gausmeec sien 4.236 3.123 73.72 Average of Land II...............00- 4.243 | 2.995 | 70.59 Kellner's Experiments : Samples I and II Ox B................. 4.165 2.027 48 62 Be Eee ee ON si dona Geen insnuiadk one 4.165 2.028 48 .68 Average.......... ee 4.165 2.028 48.65 Sample IIT, Ox Duicciscsasesssas cesses 4.156 2.792 67.20 s EE LT cls See So es aaa gaanapeeven 4.156 2.969 71.44 a Bi CMT a» Cnlaseua cite tinea Qi euaceauauncetels 4.156 3.214 77.32 SAV ETAP CLs a nieane ase doaisl gusledea sl aoiedeenie apa 4.151 2.992 71.99 Sample IV, Ox Fo... ea. ceca ina eens 4.180 3.313 79.22 ef FO = SESE) haa tans nahsceses sen Ge Gaal sae eoedoucin 4.180 3.017 72.16 IAN GLB RC yore wie receg dediacrreisre fannie sinh ent aeeel 4.180 3.165 75.69 Average of [II and IV............... 4.168 3.079 73.84 Wueat Guuten.—Seven experiments upon commercial wheat gluten are reported. three by Kithn and four by Kellner. The chemical composition of the dry matter of the three samples of gluten employed is shown in the first table on the next page. In Kiihn’s experiments the gluten caused a marked increase in the apparent digestibility of the basal ration, which by our method of computation augments the apparent metabolizable energy of the gluten, so that in one case it amounts to over 101 per cent. of the gross energy. The correction for organic matter is also rela- 296 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Kellner’s Experiments. Kihn’s Experiments, : Per Oxen B and C, Ox D, Per Cent. Per Cent. Ashen s ca sox gate Wiley a Rare ale piolete’s 1.36 2.86 2.80 Crude protein ...............045 87.88 83.45 82.67 Crude fiber. ..........20.00 e000. 0.47 0.08 0.43 Nitrogen-free extract............ 8.07 13.35 13.38 Ether extract..............0.0-- 2.22 0.26 0.72 100.00 100.00 100.00 tively large. .In Kellner’s experiments the variations are not so great. Computed as before, the results are as shown in Table V of the Appendix. Summarizing Kellner’s figures, as probably the. more accurate, we have per gram of organic matter— Apparent | Gross Energy. Metabolizable Per Cent. Cais. Energy. Metabolizable. Cals. Sample I, Ox B, Period 1.... 5.675 3.019 53.18 f Se ee eee se 5.675 3.719 65.55 CAD ED aS aac eats 5.675 4.062 71.61 AVOIARCS occ eee y ey gies 5.675 3.600 63.45 Sample II, Ox D............ 5.808 4.061 69.90 Average of [and II ......... 5.742 3.831 66.68 The wheat gluten was by no means pure protein and the above figures of course apply to the feeding-stuff as a whole, including its fat and carbohydrates as well as its protein. The question of the metabolizable energy of the latter will be considered subsequently. PEANuT O1L.—Three experiments with this substance are re- ported by Kellner, In the first the oil was given in the form of an emulsion, prepared by saponifying a small portion of the oi) with sodium hydrate, and was completely digested In the second and third experiments it was emulsified with lime-water. In this form it was less well digested. and in one case (Ox F) affected the digesti- bility of the basal ration unfavorably. The results per gram of organic matter, computed as before, constitute Table VI of the Appendix and are summarized in the following table: THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 297 Metabolizabl Gromer, | “Energy, | orShobieble ; . Cals. = Sample I, Ox D.. 9.493 7.382 77.76 “ 11 “ Fee. mal 9.464 { ee pas Average, IT... 0.0... 0 [occ cece eee 5.298 55.96 SumMMAry.—The foregoing results may be conveniently sum- marized in the table below, which shows the average gross energy per gram of organic matter, the percentage of this gross energy carried off unmetabolized in the various excreta, and the apparent metabolizable energy expressed both per gram of total organic matter and as a percentage of the gross energy: Apparent Gross Percentage Loss in Metabolizable En'gy Energy. er Tm. Or- Per anic Grm.| Per at- Or- | Cent. ter, | Feces.| Urine. | Methane. | ganic | _ of Cals. om Pee Gael Meadow hay...............0+-- 4.751/40.96| 5.71) 6.77 12.213/46.56 Timothy hay...............005 4.670/47.27| 2.61 6 .50*|2. 037/43 .62 Oat: Straw oo vee sa sied s castes ae © .14.816|56.80] 2.08) 5.32 |1.724)/35.80 Wheat straw............6.- »+.-{4.743/58.22) 2.37 8,30 |1.475/31.11 Extracted rye straw............ 4.251|12.75/—0.79) 12.46 |8.213)/75.58 Beet molasses, Sample IT......../4.188) 9.93, 2.91) 11.31 |3.174/75.85 Starch, Kiihn’s experiments. . qiuayaed 4,243/19.59}—0.92) 10.74 |2.995/70.59 «c ’Kellner’s experiments: . Heavy rations..............-. 4,165/55.91)—2.07| —2.49 |2.028/48.65 Medium rations............... 4.168)17.61)—0.66 9.21 |3.079|73.84 Wheat gluten, Kellner’s experi- WNCNS ssid ic days eas Sa he eek SS 5.742/20.16] 13.08 0.08 |3.831/66.68 Peanut GU, OX Die eco speed ciene 89 9.493|24.34/—1.08] —1.02 |7.382)/77.76 Be EE sco Ye duane ete 4 9.464164. 77;—1.19}—16.10 |4.973/52.52 es samme © pe nrer eeer aren nner 9.464/41.00} 1.37) —1.76 |5.623/59.39 * Estimated. Digestible Organic Matter. As appears especially from the figures of the last table, the loss of energy in the feces is the one which is subject to the greatest vari- ation. In other words, the digestibility of a feeding-stuff is the 298 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. most important single factor in determining its content of metabo- lizable energy. We may eliminate this factor by computing, on the basis of the determinations of digestibility, the energy of the digested organic matter and the proportion of this energy which was lost in urine and methane or was metabolizable. In this way we may secure figures which will be useful as a basis for estimat- ing the energy values of rations in experiments in which it has not been determined, and which will also afford, from some points of view, a better idea of the relative extent of the losses other than those in the feces. Coarse Fopprers ALonE.—In the cases in which coarse fodder constituted the exclusive ration the computation from the data giyen on p. 286 and. the amounts of organic matter apparently digested in the several experiments is very simple and yields the following results per gram digested organic matter: Loss in sacs Ani- Feed Gross mal. . Energy. Urine, |Methane. Pp Per Per Per Cent Grm.. ‘ Cent Cent. me. | Cals. A | Meadow hay I............ 4.509 9.75 | 10.35 | 79.90 | 3.603 II _ BBS As. cscigeteabesansne ee 4.408 8.98 | 14.62 | 76.40 | 3.368 Vv ue Bsns sigs ook ais 4.317 8.25 | 12.00 | 79.75 | 3.443 VI ee (OID yoga meae 4.398 8.65 | 12.35 | 79.00 | 3.474 xX By SGM Nadiceat atennchana 4.452 | 13.85 | 11.36 | 74.79 | 3.330 I SE OL Sea Sepeaiaetas 4.371 9.59 | 11.99 | 78.51 | 3.432 Average... ....c0cse0: 4.409 | 9.85 | 12.09 | 78.06 | 3.442 Average for timothy hay .| 4.377 4.95 | 12.33 | 82.72 | 3.620 Coarse Fopprers Appep To BasaL Ration.—From the re- sults contained in Table I of the Appendix we may compute in sub- stantially the same manner the total and metabolizable energy of the digestible organic matter of the coarse fodders which were added to the basal rations. In the table referred to, a correction was introduced for the small differences in the amount of the basal rations consumed in the periods compared. In the present com- putations it has been assumed that the organic matter of these small differences possessed the same digestibility as the total organic matter of the basal ration. For example, in the case of Ox H, THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 299 Periods 4 and 7, the amounts of digestible organic matter in the two rations were: Period Tocsuvegancaveie oa wawie wes 7106 grams PeriGd:- Aes oid esing ats wae eae Raw ees 4845“ Difference................5. 2261 “ The table shows, however, that in Period 7 the animal received 44 grams more of total organic matter in the basal ration than in Period 4. In the latter period the digestibility of the organic matter was found to be 75.7 per cent. Consequently, of the excess of 2261 grams of digestible organic matter in Period 7 44x 0.757=33 grams may be regarded as derived from the basal ration and 2261—33=2228 grams from the meadow hay added. The corresponding corrected amounts of energy as given in the same table are— Total. Cals. | Orgeatc Matters Cals. Energy of added hay (corrected). . 4 15728 .6 ‘* corresponding feces........... 5471.0 «© digested matter.............. 10257 .6 4.604 Metabolizable energy...........--...0-- 8504.8 3.817 The table on the next page contains the results of these com- putations expressed per gram of digested organic matter. Kell- ner * has made the same comparison in a slightly different man- ner. His results for the gross energy of the digested matter are given subsequently (p. 310). Those for metabolizable energy do not differ materially from those here given. CoNcCENTRATED FrEpiInc-sturrs.—The results of experiments upon concentrated feeding-stuffs may of course be computed in the same manner as those upon coarse fodders just considered. In the case of materials like starch, oil, and gluten, however, which differ widely from ordinary feeding-stuffs and which produce material and readily traceable effects upon the digestibility of the basal ration. relatively little value attaches to computations of the appar- ent metabolizable energy, and only the average results with these materials have been included in the summary. on page 301 for the * Loc, cit., 58, 414 and 447. 300 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. : Apparent - Loss in Metabolizable 2 aoe , Energy. alg ergy: , — <| a Pures, | Ber Gent, | Per Cent. | PE Tom Meadow Hay - Fill Sample V. ......| 4.356 8.61 10.20 81.19 3.537 G|2 ae Viiweesee| 4.496 7.72 12.58 79.70 3.583 ‘Average ...... 4.426| 8.17| 11:39 | 80.44] 3.560 H| 2] Sample VI......./ 4.531] 8.32] 7.74 | 83.94] 3.803 H|7 — & VIL. .| 4.604 7.66 9.43 82.91 3.817 J|2 “« YVI.......| 4.506 9.64 9.33 | 81.03 3.651 Average ...... 4.547 8.54 8.83 82.63 3.757 Oat Straw F/2 Sample II....... 4.441 5.30 10.17 84.53 3.754 Gjl1 AE Dad wate 4.586 4.32 14.42 81.26 3.726 : Average ...... -4.514| 4.81] 12.30] 82.89 | 3.740 Wheat: Straw : HI Sample Toneatdase’ 4.488) .4.75 20.11 75.14 3.373 J {I ‘ Dawes pein 4.397 6.49 19.67 73 .84 3.247 Average ...... 4,443 5.62 19.89 74.49 3.310 Extracted Straw : : H| 5 Sample d reer ee” 4.240 | —0.52 13.99 86.53 3.668 J [5 ]- “ I Steet - 4.164 | —1.29 14.58 86.71 3.611 Average ...... 4.202 | —0.91 14.29 86.62 3.640 sake of completeness. Those upon peanut oil have been omitted, since the varying effect upon digestibility and upon the methane fermentation makes the results as computed in this way appear of questionable significance. SumMaryY.—The average results upon the various materials experimented with are summarized on the opposite page. As appears from the figures of the table, the apparent metabo- lizable energy of the digestible organic matter of the different coarse fodders is quite uniform. At first sight it appears somewhat sur- prising that oat straw should show more favorable results than hay, but the reason is readily seen in the smaller loss which takes place in the urine; in wheat straw this loss is somewhat larger, while that THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 3or ENERGY OF DIGESTED ORGANIC MATTER. ead Apparent, Loss in Metabolizable Total Energy. Energy. Cals. Urine, | Methane,| p, Per Per Per CG ae Grm., Cent. Cent. ent. | Cals. Meadow hay (seven samples)........ 4.439] 9.62} 11.52 | 78.86) 3.501 Timothy hay veeeees| 4.877] 4.95) 12.33 | 82.72) 3.620 OST SUPA WS ayeiyiesnusidiaeusee ereievcad oe aus: 5 acaus 4.514) 4.81] 12.30 | 82.89) 3.740 Wheat straw 4.443] 5.62] 19.89 |. 74,49} 3.310 Extracted straw 4.202/—0.91} 14.29 | 86.62) 3.640 Beet molasses, Sample II............ 4.124| 3.24) 12.52 | 84.24) 3.473 Starch, Kiihn’s experiments......... 4.192/—1.19]. 13.42 | 87.77) 3.679 “« “Kellner’s experiments *.......] 4.012/—0.92; 11.12 | 89.80) 3.603 Wheat gluten, Kellner’s experiments..| 5.749) 16.59} 0.02 | 83.39 4.792 * Average of Samples III and IV. in the methane is considerably larger, resulting in a materially lower figure for metabolizable energy. The results summarized in the two preceding tables, it should be remembered, include, as already pointed out, all the effects pro- duced by the addition of the material under experiment to the basal ration; that is, they give the apparent metabolizable energy. In the case of the coarse fodders no other method of computation is practicable, and the same would be true in most instances of ordinary concentrated commercial feeding-stuffs. In such cases it is rarely possible to distinguish with accuracy between the energy derived from the material experimented with and the subsidiary effects of the latter upon the digestibility of the several in- gredients of the ration or upon the losses of energy in urine and methane. We may anticipate, therefore, that the results of future determinations of the metabolizable energy of ordinary feeding- stuffs will of necessity be expressed substantially in the summary manner here employed. With the nearly pure nutrients used in many of Kellner’s exe ‘periments the case is different. Here it is possible to take account, to a large degree, of the secondary effects, such as those, for exam- ple, which in the case of wheat gluten result in figures exceeding 100 per cent. for the apparent metabolizable energy, and to compute results which represent more nearly the actual metabolizable energy contained in the substances themselves. In these cases, therefore, 302 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the averages of the tables are of less significance than. the results given in the following pages, where the digestible nutrients are taade the basis of the computation. ENERGY OF DIGESTIBLE NUTRIENTS. The foregoing paragraphs have dealt with the apparent metabolizable energy of feeding-stuffs, and the results have been expressed in terms of total or of digestible organic matter, or as percentages of gross energy. We now turn to a con- sideration of such data as are available regarding the several con- ventional groups of nutrients into which the food of herbivorous animals is ordinarily divided and inquire whether it is possible to compute average factors for- their metabolizable energy which shall be useful in themselves and be of value particularly for pur- poses of comparison with earlier experiments. This was the special purpose of Kellner’s investigations, and his experiments supply valuable data on-these points as regards cattle and ‘presumably other ruminants, which may be supplemented to a certain extent from experiments by other investigators upon horses and swine. In considering the experiments from this standpoint, Kellner’s discussion and methods of computation have been closely followed, the attempt being made to compute as accurately as possible the real metabolizable energy of the several nutrients. Gross Energy. If it were possible to add pure nutrients to a basal ration and be sure that they would have no effect upon the utilization of the latter, it would be a comparatively simple matter to determine their real metabolizable energy. As a matter of fact, however, as has been seen, this is not possible. Not only is it impracticable to secure large quantities of pure nutrients, but each such addition to the basal ration is liable to affect especially the digestibility of the latter. Consequently the difference in metabolizable energy between the two rations fails to represent correctly the real metabolizable energy of the nutrient added. In order to compute the latter we must have a basis for correcting the results for the small variations in the amounts of other nutrients digested, and for this purpose we need to know the total or gross energy of the digested matters. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 303 _ Crupe Fiser.—In four of his experiments on hay fed alone, Kellner * determined the heats of combustion of the crude fiber of the food and of the feces with the following results per gram: Crude Fiber of | Crude Fiber of Hay, Cals. Feces, Cals. I....| 4.4350 4.7378 II....| 4.3907 4.7423 Ill....| 4.4548 4.9037 IV....| 4.4230 4.7426 It appears from these figures that the crude fiber of meadow hay has a higher heat value than pure cellulose (4.1854 Cals. accord- ing to Stohmann), obviously due to the admixture of compounds richer in carbon, while the indigestible crude fiber of the feces has a still higher heat value. Merrill + has also reported similar results for the crude fiber of oat hay, clover silage, and oat and pea silage, as follows: Crude Fiber of Fodder. | Crude Fiber of Feces. Cals. per Grm. Cals. per Grm. Oat hay............- 4.405 4.662 Clover silage......... 4.610 5.215 Oat and pea silage.... 4.667 4.820 It follows that the digested portions of the crude fiber must contain less potential energy than the crude fiber of the feed, and from the known digestibility of the latter it is easy to calculate what the heat of combustion of the digested portion must be. Kellner’s results, after deducting 5.711 Cals. per gram for the slight amounts of nitrogenous matter still contained in the crude fiber, were as shown on the next page. The average result shows that not only the chemical com- position but likewise the heat of combustion of the digested crude fiber varies but little from that of pure cellulose. Merrill’s figures, computed in the same manner from the data of the digestion experiments reported by Bartlett,t but without the correction for * Loc. cit., 47, 299. + Maine Expt. Station, Bull. 67, p. 170. {Ibid., pp. 140 and 150, and Report, 1898, p. 87. 304 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Crude Equivalent Fiber, Energy, Grms Cals. Wit WAY sees: bee ee aehe ss skew eee ae ee 2832 12532 .8 WSOCOS cence s saad cake va tae ea sale hee 1034 4869.2 I [ Digested fiber...............- ee eee eee 1798 |. 7663.6 Heat of combustion pergram............/... joteee 4.2623 Min BY", eacaes Giese y seh aona's4s anew leute ae ‘| 2394 10503 .0 ; OS FECES). sags carne o 54 doe Ee aTES ee BE eS 822 3878.1 I Digested fiber............ eee e eee eee 1572 6624.9 Heat of combustion per gram............/........ 4.2143 ( Mi DEY Sisal in dialed ore cele ete Yarenareratehe aaron 2329 10367 .7 BE FO COS saia-fat ayes accel favelprta ted eralie “are ele sas 769 3754.0 III Digested fiber.......... 0... ces eee eeee 1560 6613.7 Heat of combustion per gram............)......05 4.2396 (| Unthay: cvewame anes ses daaseoodes.os 1978 8732.0 BEE BOBS: seas ssacavd0¥ 9-26 auovaraon ata @,e4pae © ede ele 716 3479 .2 Iv : Digested fiber..............c cece eens 1262 5252.8 Heat of combustion per gram............/.....0.. 4.1623 Average heat of combustion per gram..|........ 4.2196 nitrogenous: matter, give the following results per gram for the digested crude fiber: Oat hay..............-0. 2020200220. 4.161 Cals. Clover silage... .............00005 4.123 “ Oat and pea silage...........0.... 4.584 * Eruer Exrract.—Similar determinations by Kellner * on the ether extract of hay and feces yielded the following results per gram: Ether Extract | Ether Extract of Hay, Cals. | of Feces, Cals. ae vaeees 9.1604 9.7690 rer 9.8923 cae } eae | 9.8646 8 DV ie wsina 9.0554 9.8314 Wise ares 9.1062 9.7640 Average. . 9.1940 9.8243 * Loc. cit. 47, 301. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 305 A calculation similar to that made for the crude fiber yielded the following figures for the heat of combustion of the digested portion: Linea Loko tanelees Rate See Se 8.239 Cals. TD oie slate tes. a hare ate sty alte a ate 7.802 “ TV x ching chacticiercers eons ree eee ere 8.185 “ VV ics otis cdaiva ole aupitiel aes oop anions 8.267 “ v 8.685 “ That these results are more or less discordant is not surprising in view of the uncertain elements involved in the determinations. Applying the average figures for the energy per gram of the ether ex- tracts to the total amounts eaten and excreted in the five experiments taken together, we have for the average energy of the apparently digested ether extract 8.322 Cals. per gram, a figure considerably below the results recorded on p. 238 for either animal or vegetable fats. It must be remembered, however, that the ether extract of the feces contains more or less metabolic products, so that the above result does not represent the actual energy of the digested ether extract. It does, however, represent the energy correspond- ing to the difference between food and feces with which we reckon in computing rations, and from this point of view it is of value. NITROGEN-FREE Exrract.—The nitrogen-free extract cannot be separated and examined like the crude fiber and the ether ex- tract, but it is possible to arrive at an estimate of its heat of com- bustion indirectly. For this purpose Kellner assumes the average heat of: combustion of the proteids (proteid nitrogen 6.25) as 5.711 Cals. per gram and that of the non-proteids as equal to that of asparagin, viz., 3.511 Cals. per gram. By subtracting from the gross energy of food or feces as directly determined the energy of the amounts of proteids, non-proteids, crude fiber, and ether ex- tract shown by analysis to be present, he computes the heat of combustion of the nitrogen-free extract. Furthermore, by compar- ing the results on food and feces as in the case of the crude fiber the heat of combustion of the digested portion may be computed. The results per gram of such a computation for the same four ex- periments were: * * Loc. cit., 47, 303-306. 306 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Nentt oeee N -fr. Extract Digested N .-fr. ° ay, of Feces, Extract, Cals. per an Cals. per Gram. | Cals. per Gram. Deethis te teh shea eetend Ae concen ane 4.5713 5.2834 4.203 Tso gasyieen! rey rian sen ene ek 4.6547 5.4212 4.146 De cronies ccxeee he oe eae 38 4.5029 5.1058 4,246 BV wen dattcareers cons eb acess eS 4.6081 5.2484 4.335 Average.............0.. 4.584 5.265 4.232 In view of the indirect nature of the computation the results ‘agree as well as could be expected and show that, as might be anticipated from its chemical composition, the heat of combustion of the digested portion of the nitrogen-free extract did not vary widely from that of starch. DicEsteD Matrer oF Mixep Rations.—The Méckern experi- ments afford accurate data as to the energy of the total digested matter of a large number of mixed rations. Kellner * has com- pared this with the computed energy of the same material. For this computation the factors used were: for fat, 8.322 Cals. per gram; for crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract, the average of Stohmann’s figures for starch and cellulose, 4.184 Cals. per gram; for protein provisionally, 5.711 Cals. per gram. Of the fifty-nine experiments, twelve, in which large amounts of wheat gluten or oil were fed, showed sufficient differences to indicate that the figures assumed for protein and fat were too low as applied to these two materials. In the other forty-seven cases the differences were nearly all less than 2 per cent. of the total amount and were in both directions. The special interest of these results lies in the fact that they show that we may safely use the above figures as indicated on p. 302 to correct the results reached from a comparison of two rations. NITROGEN-FREE EXTRACT oF STaRCH.—As an example of Kell- ner’s method of computation we may compare the results for Ox H in Period 3, with starch, and in Period 4, on the basal ration. The total energy of the apparently digested matter (compare Table TV of the Appendix) was— Period 3, with starch................. 28,718 Cals. Period 4, without starch.............. 21,763 « Difference sé: viscey se eecasse aed seve 6,955 “* * Loc. cit., 58, 407. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 3°7 A slightly less amount of the basal ration was eaten in Period 3 than in Period 4. The difference in crude nutrients and in esti- mated digestible nutrients was as follows: Estimated Digestible. Total, ae Equivalent pieeaa Baeray. Cals. ees Ratna 4 2 11.4 de fiber..........8.. 13 Nitrogen-free extract.... 23 ' 24 i 111.8 This amount of 112 Cals. should be added to the energy of the digested matter of Period 3 or subtracted from that of Period 4 in order to render them comparable, thus making the real difference due to the starch 7067 Cals. Still further, the starch diminished the digestibility of the other nutrients of the ration by the following amounts: Grms. | ynavey Cala. Protein. ..........- 118 673.8 Crude fiber........ 17 71.1 Ether extract...... 9 74.9 819.8 Had these amounts been digested in Period 3 as in Period 4, the energy of the digested matter of the ration would have been 820 Cals. greater, and the difference between the two periods would have been 7887 Cals. The digestible nitrogen-free extract was 1876 grams more in Period 3 than in Period 4. Assuming all of this to be derived from the starch, we have for the energy of each gram of digested nitrogen-free extract 7887+ 1876= 4.204 Cals. The following table* contains the results of all the starch experiments computed in the manner just outlined: * Loc. cit., 58, 412. 308 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ENERGY OF DIGESTED NITROGEN-FREE EXTRACT OF STARCH. OR TE oigg tee ce paled wa te eee wae 4.283 Cals. OM Veancnieiescovicacategeracs 4.202 “ Ox V (Period 2a)............ 0000s 4.380 “ Ox V (Period 2b)............e02205+ 4.3824 “ Ox VI (Period 2b)..............65. 4.159 “ Ox) Biases a xmincene en Gaeta 4.050 “ Ox: Ci cern ep ttt eataamme eae 4.000 “ Ox Di iecccseeaeeet ee Wee ew eee 4.099 “ Ox Behe a eae a ns ee 4.219 “ AC nee ere etree . 4.213 Ox ye), coc tare ce he eke tit linn 4.204 “ Ox a aan Hae es 4.095 “ ERROR 5 a ewe ke ee ae 4.185 “« CARBOHYDRATES OF EXTRACTED Srraw.—Computed in the same manner as the experiments upon starch, the two experiments upon this substance gave the following results: * Ox Hees eeea eee eenisagee sees 4.278 Cals. ORM rede iia ie betel amas eevee 4.216 “ AVETARE 5 cag ite Sede, aes 4,247 “ This average is slightly higher than woulda be computed on the assumption that the digested crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract had the heat values respectively of the digested crude fiber of hay and the digested nitrogen-free extract of starch. Peanut O1.—Four experiments upon this substance similarly computed give the following results; * Ox Ds pate oe eeaeaaa dt 8 508 Cals. OX Bip 28s ese ey eaten eres 8 845 “ OK! Haas odorovers arcane trans aeahe gin earaiw eere y 8 820 “ OX Giaoe dean veawew eee om Pema 9.112 * AVELAGE ficsiete ny ie oda 8.821 “ * Loc cit, 68 413 and 414 THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 309 As in the case of the ether extract of hay, the energy of the digested fat is less than that of the original material, which was 9.478 Cals. per gram. Protein or WHeat GLuTEN.—Comparing the experiments with and without this material exactly as in the case of the starch, we have the following results * for the energy of the digested protein: -Ox B (Period 1)...............00.. 5.728 Cals. Ox B (Period 3)...............0c0s 5.817“ Ox C (Period 8............... 0000. 5.712 “ Ox D (Period 4)..............0.005 6.040 “ Ox E (Period 4)................... 6.009 ‘ Ox III (Period 3).................... 6.166 “ Ox III (Period 4).... .............. 6.277 Ox IV (Period 3).............. -»... 6.061 “ AVEDALG: ech ieidadawncueeweiee 5.976 “ In these trials three different kinds of gluten were used which were prepared by somewhat different processes. The averages for the three sorts separately were as follows: NOs yds died cove Meebo bee Be 5.732 Cals. Re Davadics cuivds vee Wasa Seaton e Oulooo BO cclesrea a icace naar denianeheite na 6.168“ 5.975 The above figures refer to the so-called crude protein, that is, to nitrogen X 6.25. The proteins of wheat, however, contain con- siderably over 16 per cent. of nitrogen. Using Ritthausen’s factor, namely, 5.7, for the computation of protein from nitrogen reduces the amount of protein in the gluten and increases that of the nitrogen-free extract by the same amount. The energy of the digested protein when computed on this basis equals 6.148 Cals. per gram. Orcanic Matter of Coarse ‘Fopprrs.—For the total digested organic matter of hay and straw the following heat values per gram were computed: * * Loc, cit., 58, 412 and 414. 1 310 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Meadow hay I, Ox A....... eee eee eee 4509 Cals. & gar: oma 6 Enceneete relict 4408 “ e IB SOON awed 4317 Cals. J 4. cc Be oS Veet cue 4398 “ ald ‘ BMS Rete Siecae eateeis Gury ios 4452 “ sake) G (me as Cepeda ae etree ce eer 4371 “ ne Ae eee 4355 Cals. tM SS Gauena cs 4495 “ \ sor " " if VI 8 Hie acengea 4534 “ a Zam) Caan) s Orne yeeeyee 4601 ‘ 4535 “ ee Be OV Tg J be ealer eek 4502 “ Average of 7 kinds ..................5- 4437 “ Oat straw, Ox Fle... cee eee eee ee eee 4443 Cals. A ae, E) 2] Seen ree Ory ren oe 4584 “ AV OTARC ii yf cae deste see sae tele 4513 “ Wheatistraw; OX H ws scsece cess awew ee nee 4553 Cals. a MO OX diesasanininnss--83 sees aes 4387 “ AVETABE oho Uh Gisiauiie aS saree Gales seats 4470“ The digestible matter of the straw has apparently about the same heat value as that of hay. Metabolizable Energy. Protein.—A portion of the gross energy of the digested protein is removed in the urea and other nitrogenous products of metabo- lism, and in addition to this there is to be considered the possibility of a loss of energy by fermentation in the digestive tract. Lossrs 1N MretHanre.—In nine of the Mockern experiments in which wheat gluten or flesh-meal was added to the basal ration, the amount of carbon excreted in the form of hydrocarbons per day and head was as tabulated on the opposite page. The differences between the excretion with and without gluten are small in amount and are sometimes positive and sometimes negative, the averages being probably within the limit of experi- mental error. The percentage losses of energy in methane as THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 311 Carbon in Form of Hydrocarbons, Petied| Added, eriod. led, With Grms. rg Basel Addition of Differences, Grms.’ oan Grms. Kihn: Ox: Tess pens cave 3 680 186.4 205.7 +19.3 ASW ei. ie se hers 4 1360 186.4 207.6 +21.2 ae & Career ere ee 3 680 187.7 187.6 - 0.1 ee, 2, ae ee 2a 1000 * 148.7 162.9 +14.2 OO OX ees wena aie's 2b 1000 * 148.7 157.4 + 8.7 Average......... 171.6 184.2 +12.6 Kellner OX: Brisa desrstooins 1 1700 208.9 211.0 + 2.1 OB Gels tea wait 3 1700 208.9 200.9 — 8.0 Class. eega tees 3 1700 183.0 167.1 —15.9 BO DD is ei aeundaicnies 4. 1600 166.1 170.7 + 4.6 Average......... ~ 191.7 187.4 — 4.3 * Flesh-meal. computed in Table V of the Appendix, like the figures just given for the carbon of the methane, lead to the conclusion that the pro- tein of the food does not participate in the methane fermentation. Those figures were: Ox ITI, Period 3.................. 10.81 per an, TTD, 8 Alaa aisn dw arene 5.08 “ BODEN CES ave Saag area atte’ —1.26 “ “ “ B, Vana hea norde sane aie 0.08 “ “ “ B, $C (Baa atin saeueed —1.62 “ "G, Bue vaans ete aaes —-3.69 “ “ Ui ME) Ae eam Ga i) Average ..........-.0065 -.. —0.83 “ Kellner * reaches the same conclusion by comparing the ratio of the methane carbon to the amount of digested carbohydrates (nitrogen-free extract + crude fiber) in the several periods. The former amounted to the following per cent. of the latter in his experiments: * Loc. cit., 58, 420. 312 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. . Basal Rati Pee Get” | FS OR} B init ou dawsaes 2.94 2.96 OSS Bis votes wat ccnbuesd sx ase 2.94 ° 2.82 Ci siass ak sete eis ies 2.71 2.41 OO Di loeeragacs wistagge secates 2.75 2.71 6b e Sewucd sane salva 2.87 3.19 Average ........... 2.84 2.82 Had the large quantities of digestible protein added to the basal rations produced any material amount of methane, that fact must have been reflected in the above percentages. This method of comparison takes into account the probable effect of the carbo- hydrates of the wheat gluten in increasing the production of methane, and the substantial agreement of the results with and without protein leads to the same conclusion as the preceding data. It seems fair to presume that this conclusion applies to protein in general, although a strict demonstration of it, especially for coarse fodders, would have its difficulties. Losses In Urtne.—While the assumption that the urine is essentially an aqueous solution of urea leads to grave errors in the case of the carnivora, this is still more emphatically true of the urine of herbivora, particularly of ruminants. The presence in the urine of herbivora of hippuric acid and other nitrogenous compounds less highly oxidized than urea has of course long been known, while, as stated on p. 27, the presence of considerable amounts of non- nitrogenous organic matter was subsequently demonstrated by Henneberg and by G. Kithn in the urine of ruminants. It follows from these facts that the energy content of the urine of these animals must be higher. in proportion to its nitrogen than is the case with carnivora or with man, but the experimental dem- onstration of this fact and the realization of the extent and im- portance of the difference are of comparatively recent date. Catile.—It is to Kellner * that we owe the first direct determi- nations of the potential energy of the urine of cattle. The two animals used in the experiment were fed, the one (A) on meadow hay, and the other (B) on meadow hay and oat straw. The results as regards the urine were as follows, per day and head: * Loc. cit., 47, 275. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 313 Ox A. : Ox B. Total nitrogen .............. 61.28 grams. 46.63 grams. “© earbon ......... elaaens 203.20“ 161.30“ Hippuric acid ............... 145.00" 126.40 “ Total energy ..............., 1945.00 Cals 1549.40 Cals. Assuming all the nitrogen not contained in the hippuric acid to have been in the form of urea, we have the following as the distri- bution of the carbon-and of the energy of the urine: Ox A. Ox B. Amount. Per Cent. Amount. Per Cent Carbon : Grms. . Gros. In hippuric acid ....... 87.48 43.05 76.26 47.28 OY MITC By ios oe eee evita © 21.40 10.53 15.75 9.76 ‘“« other compounds... . 94.32 46.42 69.29 42.96 Total g2ncnes cose 203.20 100.00 161.30 100.00 Energy ‘ Cals. Cals. In hippuric acid ....... 821.30 42.23 715.90 46.20 £6 UTCS oa cee ueececes 271.40 13.95 199.60 12.88 “ other compounds. ... 852.30 43.82 633.90 40.92 Potale 2scaceecasecns 1945.00 100.00 1549.40 100.00 While the assumption that all the nitrogen was present either as hippuric acid or urea is not strictly correct. still the figures suffice to’show, first, that. a considerable proportion of the energy of the proteids of the food may be removed in the hippuric acid, and second, that the urine contains relatively considerable amounts of non-nitrogenous organic matter. Had the energy of the urine been computed from its nitrogen reckoned simply as urea the results would have been as follows: | Ox A. | Ox B. Calculated from N aS UTeS... 2... ee ee 331.6 Cals 252.3 Cals Actually present.........--.0-22222006- 1945.0 “ 1549.4 “ In experiments by the writer on the maintenance ration of cattle,* determinations of the total energy of the urine of steers * Penna. Experiment Station, Bull 42, p. 150. 314 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. were likewise made. Calculated per gram of nitrogen the results were as follows: Feed. Steer No. 1. | Steer No. 2. | Steer No. 3. Timothy hay and corn meal ........... 37.79 Cals.| 28.35 Cals. Cotton-seed feed.............000 eee eee 40.64 “ 134.25 “ |28.82 Cals. Timothy DAV 22.5. bcs Gath esha Rdoueye a'scaeee 19.29 “ |/18.01 “ |12.47 “ © andstarch.....0.....0.00% 25.02 <“ Wheat straw, corn meal, and linseed meal|11.24 “ |10.77 “ {10.95 “ The methods employed to prepare the urine for combustion were not altogether satisfactory, and the range of possible error is rather large. In but two cases, however, was the energy of the urine less than twice that corresponding to its nitrogen calculated as urea (5.434 Cals.), while in one case it reached over seven times that amount. Neither carbon nor hippuric acid having been deter- mined, no computations can be made as to the amount of non- nitrogenous matter present. Jordan * has reached similar results on the urine of cows, the average energy content per gram of nitrogen being as follows: Total Nitrogen, | Potential Energy,| Energy per Grm. Grms. Cals. Nitrogen, Cals. Cow No. 12 7 Pé@riod) 15.307 aces ess 87.0 1658.3 19.06 BOO Doc hye dahon Sse A 78.8 1547.2 19.63 Beawaustasave ad 42.8 1323.5 30.93 Cow No. 10.............. 65.5 1452.5 22.18 As in the writer’s experiments, the energy per gram of nitrogen varies within wide limits, being greatest when the total nitrogen of the urine is least. In other words, it would appear that the non-nitrogenous ingredients of the urine of cattle are subject to less fluctuation than the nitrogenous ingredients. Kellner’s later experiments have fully confirmed his earlier results, as will appear in greater detail in subsequent paragraphs. He finds that the carbon rather than the nitrogen of the urine is the measure of its potential energy, and that an estimate of 10 Cals. per gram of carbon gave for his experiments results closely approximating the truth.t * New York State Experiment Station, Bull. 197, p. 28. } Loc. cit., 58, 437. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 315 Other Species —We may probably assume without serious error that the results obtained with cattle apply in general to sheep and other ruminants. No direct determinations of the energy of the urine of the horse or the hog have yet been reported, but Zuntz & Hagemann * have made some estimates of it in the case of the horse on a mixed ration of hay, oats, and straw. They determined the total carbon and total nitrogen of the urine and, on the assump- tion that only urea and hippuric acid are present, compute the proportion of each of these, and thence jhe energy of the urine. They thus find the potential energy of the latter, per gram of nitro- gen, equal to 15.521 Cals. Neither hippuric acid nor energy having been determined directly, it is impossible to check the above com- putation or to ascertain whether any non-nitrogenous organic matter was present. It is to be noted, however, that the ratio of carbon to nitrogen in the urine was much lower than in Kellner’s experiments on cattle, viz.: Zuntz & Hagemann................ 1.526 :1 Kellner, Ox A....... cee cece eee 3.315 21 OX: Beas waves oaks eee eee 3.458 : 1 This fact clearly indicates that at least there was very much less non-nitrogenous matter present in the former case. Meissl, Strohmer & Lorenz { in their respiration experiments on swine likewise determined carbon and nitrogen in the urine. Computed by the method of Zuntz & Hagemann the energy of the urine averaged 9.55 Cals. per gram of nitrogen, while the average ratio of carbon to nitrogen was 0.745 :1. These results would seem to indicate that the loss of energy in the urine of the hog is not very much greater than in that of the carnivora. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF PROTEIN OF CONCENTRATED FEEDS. —Accepting it as demonstrated that there is no material loss of potential energy in the form of fermentation products of protein, the data regarding the energy of the urine just considered afford the basis for an approximate estimate of the metabolizable energy of the digested protein. Catile.—Kellner’s experiments upon cattle afford data for com- puting the metabolizable energy of the digested protein of wheat * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. ITI, 239. ft Zeit. f. Biol., 22, 63. 316 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. gluten and of beet molasses. The method of computation is pre- cisely similar to that already employed for calculating the metabo- lizable energy of the total organic matter; that is, the results upon the basal ration are subtracted from those upon the ration con- - taining the material under experiment. _ Taking as an example the results upon wheat gluten with Ox C in Periods 1 and 3 we have the following comparison: Digested. Gain of Energy | Nitrpgen Nitrogen of Urine, by Protein, | Crude Pe “| Ether ° Cals. Animal, Grms. Fiber, Extract Extract. Grms. Grms. Gris. Grms. Period 3......... 1694 1279 5648 34 2592.8 20.31 BE OM aniecciccs nia 598 1289 5464 40 1666.4 16.01 Difference...... 1096 —10 184 —6 926.4 4.30 The difference of 4.3 grams in the amount of nitrogen gained by the animal is equivalent to 32 Cals. which would otherwise have appeared in the urine. This added to the 926.4 Cals. actually found makes a total of 958.4 Cals. for the increase in the potential energy of the urine due to the 1096 grams of protein digested. There are also differences in the amount of non-nitrogenous matters digested, particularly of the nitrogen-free extract. As Tables I, III and IV of the Appendix show, both starch and crude fiber, as repre - sented by the extracted straw, tend to diminish the amount of energy carried off in the urine. These differences were observed when fron 2 to 2.5 kilograms of these substances were added to the basal ration. If the differences are proportional to the amount fed, the energy corresponding to the small difference observed in this ex- periment would not exceed 15 or 20 Cals., and may be neglected, while the maximum difference in any experiment of the series would probably not exceed 70 to 75 Cals. Assuming that all the additional protein digested came from the wheat gluten, we have for the corresponding energy of the urine 958.4 1096 =0.874 Cals. per gram protein digested. Subtracting this from the total energy of the digested protein as found on p. 309, viz., 5.975 Cals., we have 5.101 Cals. as the metabo- THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 317 lizable energy of one gram of digested protein of wheat gluten in this experiment. For the four experiments upon this substance, computed as in the above example, the results were as follows: “ Difference in pan Energy of Urine.* Glut Per Gi f Gra. Taek Proteii,, Ox B, Periods land 8.............. as 2185 2547.3 1.166 SE UC) POM OG Bieta dauaine auicvart aad eolereadla wate 1096 958.4 0.874 Be Ee Ae races nba’ oclule ane vai 1056 1061.1 1.005 6 ge | MRS oe a ase ace le ave datencgve eiauate arene 1148 1362.1 1.186 AVCTAS Cis 04 ieee saw e BEG 34 Oe eS 1371 1482.2 1.081 * Corrected to nitrogen equilibrium. Subtracting from the total energy of the digested protein the potential energy carried off in the urine we have for the metab- olizable energy of one gram of protein 5.975 Cals. —1.081 Cals. =4.894 Cals. If we use Ritthausen’s factor, 5.7, for proteids, the average digested protein becomes 1250 grams and the loss of energy in the urine 1.190 Cals. per gram of protein. Subtracting this from 6.148 Cals., the gross energy of one gram of NX5.7 (p. 309), we have for the metabolizable energy of the latter 4.958 Cals. per gram. The average increase in the energy of the urine for each addi- tional gram of nitrogen excreted in these experiments (6.756 Cals.) was almost exactly the same as Rubner found in his experiment on extracted lean meat (6.695 Cals.). This may be taken as indi- cating that the process of proteid metabolism is substantially the same in both classes of animals, while the fact that the result is notably greater than the energy of urea shows that in the herbivora as in the carnivora other waste products than urea result from the proteid metabolism. In three other experiments beet molasses was added to the basal ration, resulting in the digestion of an increased amount of nitrogenous matter. Computing the results as in the case of the 318 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. wheat gluten, and assuming that the large amounts of soluble carbohydrates digested had no effect on the potential energy of the urine, the results were as follows: Protein Digested Difference in Energy of Urine.* none 1 rms. . Total, Cals. Per ree Eveeety ORG Pte ah bas aeehh's audiiats 117 256.1 2.189 OS UHigwcqhnes chm ne te pine 160 240.3 1.502 MO Vtg bio 08 Nhe 2 iin RS B/E 122 192.6 1.579 Average.......... eee eee 133 229.7 1.727 * Corrected to nitrogen equilibrium. It will be seen that the loss of energy in the urine is much greater than in the case of the gluten or than in Rubner’s experi- ments with carnivora. Since it is improbable that the soluble carbohydrates of the molasses escape oxidation, it would appear that some of the nitrogenous material of the latter must have passed through the system unmetabolized. Kellner suspects that it is made up in part at least of xanthin bases. If we consider the nitrogen of the molasses to represent crude protein (NX6.25) with a heat value of 5.711 Cals. per gram, the metabolizable energy per gram would be 3.984 Cals. In view, however, of the fact that only a very small proportion of the nitro- gen of the molasses is in the proteid form, such a calculation seems of doubtful value. Swine.—In the investigations of Meissl, Strohmer and Lorenz * upon the production of fat from carbohydrates (p. 176) the carbon and nitrogen of the urine were determined in six experiments. Applying to the results Zuntz & Hagemann’s method of computation (p. 315) we obtain the following estimates for the energy per gram of nitrogen in the urine of the hog in these experiments and for the corresponding metabolizable energy of the digested protein: * Zeit. f. Biol., 22, 63. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 319 pane Pre a iuoees Total Energy Metane ment Feed. as Urea, | vpurie | Energy |Perymm™| Energy No. Grms. Acid, |°% Cals” Nitrogen, ea Grms. F Cals. |Protein, als. 1 TRIGGareve, doy ine Gintaleis aes e's 9.58 0.88 | 115.7 | 11.06 | 3.941 2 MS ¥a3 ealag PAE EER RET 9.22 1.04 | 125.6 | 12.24 | 3.753 3 Barley ws gies 3s ciecd eck sce ia 13.04 1.04 | 146.5 | 10.40 | 4.048 4 Whey, rice, and flesh meal.| 59.89 | 1.17 | 410.0 | 6.72 | 4.636 5 Nothing................. 9.35 0.45 83.7 | 8.54 | 4.344 6 ap igtae wanda Rov aitacenl ae 6.48 0.29 56.4 8.33 | 4.379 Kornauth & Arche * report the following results on the urine of swine fed chiefly upon cockle: Experiment Nitrogen, Carbon, Ratio, No. Grms. Grms. C:N. Mee sd raiehap aw rar arose 10.56 10.30 0.975 :1 Diels aebwlng wea Wea 10.30 9.53 0.926 : 1 Boxee weve mevadees 10.41 9.96 0.957 : 1 Average.........] 10.42 9.93 0.953 :1 The results, computed as in the previous case, make the average energy content of the urine 10.27 Cals. per gram of nitrogen, equivalent to a metabolizable energy of 4.067 Cals. per gram of protein. In the two fasting experiments of Meissl, Strohmer & Lorenz the ratios of carbon to nitrogen and of computed energy to nitro- gen are similar to those obtained with fasting carnivora. The abundant supply of proteids in the diet in the fourth experiment seems to have had the effect of reducing these ratios to values comparable with those obtained by Rubner for extracted meat and by Kellner for the digested protein of wheat gluten. These facts seem to indicate clearly that the nature of the proteid meta- bolism in all these animals is substantially the same. In the ex- periments in which ordinary grains were used, the computed energy content of the urine is notably greater relatively to its nitrogen. How far the excess of carbon found in these cases was due to an * Landw. Vers. Stat., 40, 177. 320 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. - increased formation of hippuric acid and what part of it, if any, is to be ascribed to the presence of non-nitrogenous matter in the urine, the experiments afford no means of estimating. The Horse.—Zuntz & Hagemann’s results on the horse, p. 315, although the result of feeding mixed rations, may be conveniently considered here. The computed energy of the urine was 15.521 Cals. per gram of nitrogen, equivalent to 2.483 Cals. per gram of protein. Assuming for the latter, as before, a value of 5.711 Cals., there remains for the metabolizable energy 3.228 Cals. per gram. PROTEIN oF Coarse FoppErs.—Almost the only data on this point are those afforded by Kellner’s experiments upon cattle. In those in which coarse fodders were used alone we can of course compute the metabolizable energy of the protein directly from the amount digested and from the energy of the urine. In those experiments in which coarse fodders were added to a basal ration we can compare the two experiments in the same manner as those upon gluten, neglecting, as in that case, the differences in the non- nitrogenous nutrients digested. Passing over the details of the computation, the final results, including the metabolizable energy of the digested protein com- puted upon the assumption that its gross energy equals 5.711 Cals. per gram, are as given in the table on the opposite page.* The writer’s experiments on timothy hay, the results of which as regards the energy of the urine have already been given on p. 314, when computed in the same manner as the above experiments give the following results for the metabolizable energy of the digested protein: Steer’ lace Giana e eee ee 2.625 Cals. fe eect eat HES AaA einen ese adereaein a a 2.830 “ He VG iis Ree Beater Bie a atee seis yeaa Rd AEA 3.716 “ AVOTABO: 23.25, bated ttc GARG Wen 3.057 “ Influence of Non-nitrogenous Matter of Urine.—In the previous paragraphs there appeared reasons for supposing that the processes of proteid metabolism are essentially the same in all domestic * The figures given in this table for digested protein, energy, etc., refer -solely to that derived from the coarse fodder and not to that of the total ration. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 321 S Dern in Metaboli 7" mergy of Urine.* etaboliz- Prot (NX6-25), pre Digested, Per Grm. of igestible Grms. Total, Protein Protein, Cals. Digested, Cals. als. Meadow Hay: No. I, Ox A............ 440 1991.3 4.526 1.185 PN aU eee Lllven cise ans neo 342 1686.9 4.933 0.778 OE Vg BO TS out einai a 137 583 .2 4,257 1.454 et Vag i AGE tes Ce 146 556.5 3.812 1.899 “ VI, “ 4H, Period 1... 193 781.4 4.049 1.662 NI, He Cee 220 798 .0 3.632 2.079 Oe Le — dren et ooh 213 930.5 4.368 1.343 ofa: aa. Satan) 8 ne ee 413 1925.7 4.662 1.049 AB SMEs cape evs’ Ws 451 1559.3 3.456 2.255 OS VB er 88 MT ve acne tee God 458 1737.9 3.794 1.917 LS) Doaiaat g), G, Goren i demir es 540 3224.6 5.973 —0.262 Average ..........00005 323 | 1434.1 4.439 1,272 Oat Straw : No. TI, Ox Fue... cece es 35 354.2 10.120 —4.409 Oe ET 8 A coun Stace aerate 48 274.0 5.710 —0.001 Average ..........0055 42 314.1 7.478 —1.767 Wheat Straw : No. I, Ox H............. Sai 289.7 (?) (2) STG Mh asin cs wiataenvotene S 14 413.2 29.520 —23.809 Average ............0. 2 851.5 (2) (?) * Corrected to nitrogen equilibrium. ’ animals and consequently that the metabolizable energy of the proteids cannot be widely different. In these results upon coarse fodders we meet an apparent contradiction of this conclusion, the metabolizable energy of the digestible protein. as above computed being quite variable and much lower than the values found for pure proteids, while in the straw we get large negative values. ; These latter results, however, while appearing at first sight para- doxical, furnish the clue to the apparent contradiction. In the case of the straws it is evident that a very considerable part of the potential energy of the urine must have been contained in non- nitrogenous substances, and that the latter must have been derived largely from the non-nitrogenous matter of the food. We have already seen, however, that these non-nitrogenous excretory prod- 322 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ucts are a normal constituent of the urine of cattle both on hay and on mixed rations. Their effect on the computation becomes more obvious in the case of the straws, simply because of the relatively small amount of protein in the latter feeding-stuffs. In these cases we get impossible results when we assume that all the potential energy of the urine is derived from the proteids metabolized, but it is clear that the results on the hays must be affected by the same error, and there is little question that the low and variable results noted in the table are to be explained in part in this way. We know no essential difference between the real proteids of the differ- ent coarse fodders, nor between those of coarse fodders and grain, nor any reason why they should not be metabolized in substantially the same way in the body and possess approximately the same metabolizable energy. It would seem more reasonable, then, to assume that the proteids of coarse fodders are metabolized sub- stantially like those of concentrated fodders, and to take provision- ally the results obtained for the protein of wheat gluten as repre- senting approximately the metabolizable energy of the digested protein of the total ration, while we regard the remaining energy of the urine as derived largely from the non-nitrogenous nutrients of the food. Hippuric Acid.—The statement last made, however, requires some modification. Not a little of the potential energy of the urine of cattle is contained in the hippuric acid which these animals. excrete so abundantly. This being a nitrogenous product, it is natural to look upon it as derived from the proteids of the food, but it must not be forgotten that this is only partially true. Its. glycocol portion originates in the proteids, but its pheny] radicle appears to be derived in these animals largely, if not wholly, from the non-nitrogenous ingredients of the food (compare p. 45). If the metabolism of one gram of protein is arrested at the glycocol stage by the presence in the organism of benzoic acid, there has already been liberated from it about 3 Cals. of energy, while about 2.7 Cals. remainin the glycocol. The resulting hippuric acid, however, contains about 11.6 Cals. of potential energy, or more than the original protein. In this case, then, the larger share of the energy of the excretory product (8.9 Cals. out of 11.6 Cals.), although con- tained in a nitrogenous substance, is derived ultimately from the THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 323 non-nitrogenous matter of the food. It is clear, then, that the non-nitrogenous moiety of the hippuric acid and the non-nitrogen- ous organic matter of the urine together represent a large share of the potential energy of the latter, and that it is quite as in- correct to compute the metabolizable energy of the protein on the assumption that all the energy of the urine is derived from it as it is, on the other hand, to simply deduct from its gross energy the , energy of the equivalent amount of urea. Ether Extract.—Our only data upon this ingredient are fur- nished by the four experiments upon steers by Kellner in which peanut oil was added to the ration. In the first two experiments this oil was emulsified by means of a small quantity of soap made from the same oil. The result was a milky fluid which was readily digestible and which caused no considerable decrease in the digesti- bility of the basal ration. In the second two experiments the oil was emulsified with lime-water, giving a thickish mass which was not very well digested and which, in the case of Ox F particularly, caused a considerable decrease in the digestibility of the crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract of the basal ration. It should be noted that in the experiment with Ox E the oil was not added to a basal ration, but was substituted for a part of the bran. From Table VI of the Appendix we obtain the summary tabulated on the next page, showing the effects of the oil upon the loss of energy in the gaseous hydrocarbons and in the urine, the results of the experi- ment on Ox E being included. Upon the evidence of these four experiments, bearing in mind that the one with Ox E was upon the substitution of oil for bran, we should not be inclined to ascribe to the fat of the food any con- siderable effect either upon the formation of hydrocarbons or upon the amount of potential energy carried off in the urine. As regards the hydrocarbons, the differences in the cases of Oxen D and G are insignificant. In the case of Ox F, on the contrary, the production of hydrocarbons was reduced nearly one half; this it may be noted was the case in which there was a considerable effect upon the digestibility of the basal ration. As regards the energy of the urine, the differences, except in the case of Ox E, are relatively small and are in both directions. Provisionally, therefore, we are probably justified in assuming 324 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. i- ‘ E f Uri E mal, | Period. (Comecten). Cals, | Mothan’ Gata D 3 With oil................ 2851:2 2909.0 D 1 Basal ration............ 2407.0 2957 .0 Differences............ —55.8 —48.0 =o E 3 Wath Oil goc.c sawed swasias 2026.2 2640.8 E 1 Basal ration............. 2312.9 2950.4 Differences............ —286.7 —309.6 F 5 With oil..............2. 1455.0 1369.1 F 3 Basal ration............ 1530.0 2560.7 Differences............ —75.0 —1191.6 G 5 With oil... ........0 0... 1452.1 2371.2 G 3 Basal ration............ 1359.6 2524.7 Differences............ 92.5 —153.5 as Kellner does that none of the energy of the fat was lost either in the hydrocarbons or in the urine, and that consequently the metab- olizable energy of the digested fat was the same as its gross energy, namely, 8.821 Cals. per gram, as given on p. 308. If we assume that the ether extract of hay behaves like the peanut oil, taking no part either in the production of methane or in the loss of energy through the urine, its metabolizable energy would likewise be the same as its gross energy, namely ,8.322 Cals. per gram, as computed on p. 305. No results upon the metabolizable energy of the ether extract are available in the case of other species of herbivorous animals. Carbohydrates.—Those of Kellner’s experiments in which starch, as a representative of the readily digestible carbohydrates. and extracted straw, consisting largely of “crude fiber,’ were added to the basal ration afford data for an approximate computation of the metabolizable energy of this group of nutrients in the ox, and experiments by Lehmann, Hagemann & Zuntz afford partial data for the horse. Starcu.—The results of the Méckern experiments, as recorded in Tables III and IV of the Appendix, show that the starch had but a slight effect upon the amount of potential energy carried off in the urine of the ox, although the general tendency was to THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 325 diminish it slightly. On the other hand, the formation of hydro- carbons was markedly increased except in two cases. It has al- ready been shown that the proteids of the food do not take part in the production of these gases, and that the same is probably true of the fat under normal conditions. Neglecting the small effects upon the urine, therefore, we may compare directly the increase in the digested carbohydrates with the increase in the gaseous hydro- carbons, using for this purpose the differences between the two rations uncorrected for the slight variations in the consumption of dry matter. Taking first the last five of Kellner’s experiments,* which seem to represent the most normal conditions, we have the following: Difference in Carbohydrates Digested. Difference in Energy of Nitrogen-free ar a Crude Fiber, , zs | “eta” | Bataet Ox D, Period 2............. —64 +1388 +424.4 pages th Ne eBay dea ee sack elsy —64 +1609 +822.0 “G OO And ec cahelirescat —50 +1598 +645.8 te EE) AS Ber sae are scauesee —26 +1861 +604.5 ohare} SS Ou sees seek e es —9 +1501 +769.9 LOtals) 0 sie ee Aaeoatwia See doe —213 +7957 3266.6 Assuming that the same proportion of hydrocarbons is pro- duced in the fermentation of crude fiber as in that of starch, we may compare the algebraic sum of the two with the energy of the methane as follows: 3266.6 Cals. + (7957 — 213) =0.422 Cals. per gram. Subtracting the latter result from the gross energy of the digested nitrogen-free extract of starch, we have for the metabolizable energy of the latter 4.185 Cals. — 0.422 Cals. =3.763 Cals. per gram. In the experiments on Oxen B and C the basal ration was a heavy one, with a rather wide nutritive ratio, and already con- tained large amounts of digestible carbohydrates. Under these cir- cumstances the added starch was very imperfectly digested, while * Loc. cit., 68, 422. 326 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the production of hydrocarbons was diminished. Kellner suggests that the latter effect may have been due to a partial suppression of the organisms causing the methane fermentation by other species, and suspects that the presence of large amounts of carbohydrates along with little protein favors this result. At any rate, the con- ditions are evidently unusual if not abnormal. In Kihn’s experiments the starch was added to a ration of coarse fodder. The nutritive ratio was wide, but the absolute amount of carbohydrates was much less than in the two experiments by Kellner just mentioned, less starch appeared to escape diges- tion, and the production of hydrocarbons was increased in every ease. .The following are Kitihn’s * results: Difference in Carbohydrates Digested. Difference in Energy of | Methane, Crude Fiber, Nitrogen-free als, Grms. Extract, Grms. Ox III, Period 2...............005 —220 1529 706.2 EOE ge Die acerca Sas anette shaw ee —180. 1408 856.7 ONG 2G ka wea xtc one grees —195 1537 752.6 OO OM. DD. alt oh a aktad eeaec —130 1539 665.5 BEDE Mig, EE Be ete ayee cpeastiannie. auahares —176 2619 1181.0 «VI, Fes) WepeO htear ase cedetns nua latalaha —146 1468 729.5 SE OND SS DB sine ween aeiaes ediate — 88 1554 649.9 BE VA, ee SB ico areas e tia aieee ete —156 2587 1407.0 Potals wis cs coin nck aces a we xe —1291 14241 6948 .4 Assuming as before the equivalence of crude fiber and nitrogen- free extract as regards the production of hydrocarbons we have 6948 .4 Cals. + (14241 — 1291) =0.537 Cals. per gram, 4.185 Cals. —0.537 Cals. =3.648 Cals. per gram. Determinations by Lehmann, Hagemann & Zuntz t+ of the amount of methane produced by the horse will be considered in connection with the metabolizable energy of crude fiber. Zuntz { has pointed out that the fermentation of the food in the horse takes place largely in the coecum and after the more digestible carbo- hydrates have been resorbed. Accordingly he regards the metabo- * Loc. cit., 44, 570. t Landw. Jahrb., 28, 125. t Arch. ges. Physiol., 49, 477. THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 327 lizable energy of starch and similar bodies in this animal as equal to their gross energy, viz., 4.185 Cals. per gram in the case of starch, Extractep Srraw.—The two experiments in which extracted straw was added to the basal ration, when computed as in the case of the starch experiments, give the following results: Difference in Carbohydrates Digested. Difference in Energy of Nitrogen-free ee .- i - 4 “Gras | Extract, Ox H, Period 5............... 2046 439 1425.1 We or aD ase rearaaees Sates 1987 449 1425.2 i Se Ree 4033 | 888 2850.3 The loss of energy in the hydrocarbons equals 0.579 Cals. per gram of total digestible carbohydrates (of which 82 per cent. was crude fiber), and the corresponding metabolizable energy of the carbohydrates is 3.668 Cals. per gram. This is a materially lower figure than Kellner found for starch and indicates that the loss of energy in the gaseous products of fermentation is greater in the ease of crude fiber than in that of the more soluble carbohydrates, an indication which, as we shall see, is confirmed by the results of other experiments. CARBOHYDRATES OF Coarse Fopprrs.—Upon the same two assumptions, viz., that the carbohydrates are the sole source of the gaseous hydrocarbons, and that the latter represent the entire loss of energy from the digested carbohydrates, we may compute the metabolizable energy of the total digestible carbohydrates of the various coarse fodders exactly as in the case of the extracted straw, the results being tabulated on the next page. If we average the results for each feeding-stuff and compute them as in the foregoing cases, our findings are as given on p. 329, where the rations are “arranged in the order of their crude fiber content. In computing the metabolizable energy, the gross energy of the digested carbohydrates has been assumed to be the average 328 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. COARSE FODDERS ALONE. ‘i Digested Carbohydrates. : * Energy of Animal. : i 5 Methane, pee ec ee Grms. - Extract, Grms. A | Meadow hay I............... 1262 | 2713 2113.7 II ee OO Roi esene 2 caveat 33 1765 | 2610 3137.2 , Vv " pian Aer eee omen rere nn 1572 2315 2268 .5 VI SEY PES ie auegioonaanaag 1642 2420 2480.6 XX fe SES MMs caphyabesta aeysaeateed ee 1560 2999 2646.1 I ‘ iccdaes Hl DSesene er opreereoaee a 1266 2348 2092.3 B 2 “ and oat straw.... 1702 2357 2331.2 III Clover fee ie “Sen ee ' 1676 2226 2670.1 IV ce fe ses ne 1565 2145 2491.3 COARSE FODDER ADDED TO BASAL RATION. Difference in Carbohydrates Digested. Energy of Animal, | Period. : hen: Crude Fiber, Nigogen: ane Grms. Extract, rms. F 1 Meadow hay V....... 546 836 689.9 G 2 . a ME, 538 886 907.4 H 2 an ee eek 703 1129 727.2 H 7 e «VI. 739 1236 898.0 J 2 es soe enema 683 1213 984.8 F 2 Oat straw IL......... 694 721 679.2. G 1 ie Fo bes cieemese ary 595 684 923 .4 H 1 Wheat straw I........ 821 524 1213.0 J 1 af OD 8 Dee ceevaets 829 616 1281.0 of the results given on pp. 304 and 306 for the digested crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract of coarse fodders, viz., 4.226 Cals. per gram. As a whole, the figures given on p. 329 show a tendency toward an increased production of methane with an increase in the proportion of crude fiber, but considerable variations are found in individual cases. It is evident, therefore, from these results, as well as from those already cited in connection with the experiments upon starch and upon molasses, that a variety of factors influence the extent of this fermentation. _ THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 329 we ata Digested aTDO.: ti * Contain Re Energy of Eee ae ee of Total rm, i Digested | TCstbo Crude Nitrogen-| ar as hydrates Miber- | ptract. | Cale | Pata” Meadow bay levis ser onue-15es 31.7 | 68.3 | 0.532 | 3.694 HE 8 IMM oe no eeiayate ls a pee ev cites 34.2 65.8 0.580 3.646 . OO Whisiectiew ds xine eae 4 35.0 65.0 0.579 3.647 OO NAD sai bd, Secs eesi es casi 37.3 62.7 0.458 3.768 ee SOOM easiete ans ok ape Minton’ 38.6 61.4 0.569 3.629 ta OO MBs sa sie cduatiog ae aed ar 40.4 59.6 0.597 3.657 “ and oat straw..... 41.9 58.1 0.574 3.652 Clover “ “ “ EG ea Sa 42.6 57.4 0.678 3.548 Oat: straw TT... oi oa sus ences eae ces 47.8 52.2 0.595 3.631 Wheat straw V..........--...0-5 59.1 40.9 0.894 3.332 A comparison of the methane production with the digestibility of the feeding-stuffs shows in general that the former is greatest when the latter is least, that is, with the feeding-stuffs which tend to remain longest in the digestive tract. Here too, however, excep- tions occur, and it would appear that the physical condition of the feeding-stuff is not without its influence. The exceedingly com- plicated nature of digestion in ruminants, and the fact that it is a chemical rather than a physiological process, and is therefore sub- ject to considerable variations according to the nature and amount, of the food, render it difficult, if not impossible, with our present knowledge to compute very trustworthy averages for the amount of energy carried off in this way. Crupe Finer. Ruminants.—Both the ultimate composition and the heat of combustion of the digested nitrogen-free extract have been shown to agree quite closely with those of starch, and the nutritive value of the former has commonly been assumed to be the same as that of the latter. If we are justified in somewhat extending this, and assuming that the nitrogen-free extract of coarse fodders suffers the same loss by the methane fermentation as does starch, the figures of the preceding paragraphs supply data for computing the corresponding loss suffered by the crude fiber. 33° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. In the case of the extracted straw, for example, there was digested in the total of the two experiments : Crude fibefao. srecseaiciwna orci sid 4033 grams Nitrogen-free extract..............-. 888 “ Assuming the loss of energy in the methane to have been 0.422 Cal. per gram of nitrogen-free extract digested (the same as that found by Kellner for starch, p. 325),‘the 888 grams of these sub- stances correspond ‘to a loss of 374.7 Cals. Subtracting this from the total loss of 2850.2 Cals., we have 2475.5 Cals. as the energy of the methane produced from 4033 grams of crude fiber, which is equal to 0.614 Cal. per gram. The total energy of the digested crude fiber was shown on p. 304 to be approximately 4.220 Cals. per gram. Subtracting the loss in the methane, 0.614 Cal., leaves 3.606 Cals. as the metabolizable energy of one gram of digested crude fiber. A similar computation of the average results upon the other coarse fodders affords the figures of the following table for the metabo- lizable energy of one gram of digestible crude fiber: Digestible Crude Fiber of Loss a sag rea : Cals. Extracted straw ..... ies ois a a ata alte ~0.614 3.606 Hay. fed. alone snc. sissies: ccs seatieeie e-aiets ered) seas 0.909 3.311 «added to basal ration ..............- 0.614 3.606 Oat straw added to basal ration .......... 0.783 3.437 Wheat straw added to basal ration......... 1,219 3.001 The loss of energy in methane, as thus computed, is in all instances greater than in the case of starch. Owing, however, to the slightly higher value obtained for the gross energy of the digested crude fiber, the difference in metabolizable energy between starch and crude fiber is somewhat less marked, and is hardly sufficient of itself to justify assigning a materially lower nutritive value to the latter. It is worthy of note also that the loss in the methane appears to be a very variable one, justifying the conclusion already reached that other factors than the proximate composition of the food ma- terially affect the extent of the methane fermentation. The Horse-—The production of methane by the horse appears to be much less copious than that by ruminants. Lehmann, Hage- THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 331 mann & Zuntz * in eight respiration experiments obtained the following results, the hydrocarbons being computed as methane: Crude Fiber Digested. Methane Excreted. 698 .5 grams 26.8 grams 5388.9 33.4 “ 451.7 “ . 12.0 “ “ce 6c 20.0 ce iz¢ “c 16.4 iz3 ce “cc 31 .0 (<3 “ if3 22 : 1 (z3 (z3 cc 23 .0 “cl As already noted on p. 326, Zuntz + has pointed out that the fermentation of the food in the horse takes place largely in the ccecum and after the more digestible carbohydrates have been resorbed. The authors consequently compute the excretion of methane entirely upon thé crude fiber of the food. On the average of the eight somewhat discordant experiments, in which the food consisted of oats, hay, and cut straw, 100 grams of digested crude fiber yielded 4.7 grams of methane, which corresponds exactly with the results reported by Tappeiner { for the artificial fermenta- tion of cellulose. In the same experiments an excretion of approxi- mately 0.203 gram of hydrogen per 100 grams digested crude fiber was observed. Deducting the corresponding amounts of energy from the energy of the apparently digested cellulose we have— Total energy of 1 gram.. : 4.220 Cals. Energy of CH, (0.047 pratt, 0. 627 Cal. Energy of H (0.002 gram)... 0.070 “ 0.697 Cal. Metabolizable energy of 1 gram............. 3.523 Cals.§ While less methane is apparently produced by the horse than by the ox, the assumption that it all arises from the fermentation of the crude fiber gives the latter a metabolizable energy not greatly different from that found in the case of the ox. It is of course * Landw. Jahrb., 238, 125. + Arch. ges. Physiol., 49, 477. t Zeit. f. Biol., 20, 88. g As computed by the authors, 3.487 Cals. on the basis of 4.185 Cals. total energy per gram of crude fiber. 332 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. implied in this that the metabolizable energy of the digested nitro- gen-free extract is the same as its gross energy. Summary.—The results recorded in the preceding paragraphs regarding the metabolizable energy of the several classes of digesti- ble nutrients are summarized in the following table: METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF DIGESTIBLE NUTRIENTS. Cattle, Horse, |' Swine, Cals. per Cals. per Cals. per Grm. Grm. Grm. Protein (N X6.25) : From wheat gluten .................00- 4.894 “ AN KSe7) cccaccesawss 4.958 “beet molasses...............0005- 3.984 «mixed grain ..............000- Se cetlill a (vane ater ats [incre Ae ool 4.083 ef “ration of oats, hay, and straw 3.228 «meadow hay ...........00eceeeee 1.272 “ timothy hay .................05. 3.057(?) FESS GR AW) Sunder x cer piete tos was Mie ord we tues (?) Fat: From peanut oil..............00 0c ee eee 8.821 «hay (ether extract)............005 8.322 Carbohydrates : : Starch, Kellner’s experiments Seng euaeer gia Ses 3.763 « ~ Kithn’s he | ee adanete aa 3.648 pee extract (assumed) .........]......... 4.185 Crude fi ber, of extracted straw .......... 3.606 “ hay fed alone............. 3.311 s «« «added to basal ration . 3.606 se “© oat straw ........0 0c eee 3.437 ar « “ wheat straw ............. 3.001 af «© mixed ration ............/...00000, 3.523 Perhaps the most striking thing about these figures is the wide range of the results upon the same class of nutrients. For reasons already stated, this is most noticeable with the protein, but it is sufficiently marked also with the other two groups. Moreover, such meager data as we possess regarding other animals than the ox indicate that the results vary with the species of animal, a fact which should not surprise us, but which, nevertheless, adds mate- rially to the complexity of the subject and greatly widens the range of necessary investigation. It is obvious, therefore, that at present our knowledge is too imperfect to allow of the assignment of average values for the metabolizable energy of the different classes of THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 333 nutrients (as ordinarily determined) even for a single species of animal. The results tabulated above, however, are amply sufficient to justify the statement on p. 279 that Rubner’s averages are not appli- cable to herbivorous animals, and that the metabolizable energy as computed with their aid is likely to vary widely from the truth. Indeed, since Rubner’s factor for fat (9.3 Cals. per gram) is 2.27 times that for carbohydrates and protein (4.1 Cals. per gram) a computation of the metabolizable energy of feeding-stuffs or rations as it has not uncommonly been made simply gives a series of figures about 4.1 times as great as that obtained for total digestible matter when the digestible fat is reduced to its starch equivalent by multi- plication by 24. So far, then, as a comparison of one feeding-stuff or ration with another is concerned, this process adds no whit to our knowledege. It does, it is true, give some idea, albeit an inade- quate one, of the total amount of metabolizable energy present. As yet, however, our accurate knowledge of the energy requirements of domestic animals for various purposes is comparatively meager. If we base our computations on the feeging standards now current, we simply repeat with them the useless multiplication performed on the feeding-stuffs. On the other hand, if we take the results of such exact experiments on the metabolism of energy as are available, then, as the above results show, we shall be computing the energy requirements upon one basis and the energy supply upon a mate- rially different one. Significance of the Results.—A much more fundamental prob- lem than that raised in the foregoing paragraph confronts us when we come to reflect upon the general method by which it has been attempted to compute the metabolizable energy of nutrients, and to consider the real significance of the results. In so doing we may properly confine ourselves to the results upon cattle, those for horses and for swine being more or less fragmentary and uncertain. By far the larger proportion of the results above tabulated, as well as the most important of them, are based on experiments in which additions were made to a basal ration, the computation being by difference. As was pointed out in discussing the apparent metabolizable energy of the organic matter on previous pages, and as was specifically illustrated in the case of one experiment on 334 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. molasses (p. 291), the difference in the metabolizable energy of the excreta is the algebraic sum of the differences in the energy of methane, urine, and the several proximate ingredients of the feces, and some of these differences may be positive and others negative. The computations of the metabolizable energy of the organic matter as made in the earlier paragraphs give the net result to the animal under the condition of the experiment and include all the secondary effects upon digestion, etc. In the computations here considered Kellner’s methods have been followed. In the first place the influence of the added feed upon the digestibility of the basal ration has been eliminated by basing the computation upon the digested matter. Still further, such effects as the decrease of the methane excretion: in certain of the experiments with molasses, oil, and starch, and the diminished export of energy in the urine under the influence of starch and ex- tracted straw, have not entered into the computation. In other words, the endeavor has been to determine the actual amount of energy liberated by the breaking down of the molecules of the di- gested starch or protein or fat in the organism without regard to these various incidental effects; that is, to determine the real and not the apparent metabolizable energy. Either method of computation would seem to be entirely defensi- ble, and our choice between them will be largely determined by the point of view. For the purposes of the physiologist, desirous of tracing the details of the chemistry and physics of metabolism, the results obtained by the latter method will be of more interest. On the other hand, the student of nutrition who is especially in- terested in the problems of feeding will not fail to note that the results thus reached represent, from his standpoint, only a part of the truth. They show (barring errors of detail) how much energy is liberated in the body from the several nutrients, but the loss or saving of energy in the incidental processes constitutes just as real a part of the balance of energy which he wishes to determine as the energy liberated from the nutrients themselves, and must be taken account of in his calculations. Whether this can best be done by using some such factors as those just tabulated and then making a correction for these incidental gains and losses, or whether the method followed in the earlier paragraphs is to be preferred, it THE FOOD AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY. 335 would probably be premature to attempt to decide at present. Pending further investigation and experience, however, it should be remembered that the figures on p. 332 will give, in most cases, too high results for the metabolizable energy of mixed rations, while the same thing is still more emphatically true of Rubner’s factors. One additional point requires mention. In discussing the metabolizable energy of protein it was pointed out (p. 320) that it is at least a plausible hypothesis that the proteids are metabo- lized in the herbivora substantially as in carnivora, and that the excess of energy in the urine is derived from the non-nitrogenous ingredients of the food. If we accept this hypothesis, however, and assume the metabolizable energy of protein (N x 6.25) to be in the neighborhood of 4.9 Cals. per gram, then the figures for the non-nitrogenous nutrients are subject to a still further deduction, especially in the case of coarse fodders. If we were to assign to the fat its full value as given, it would not be difficult to compute the metabolizable energy of the carbohydrates on this basis, and probably a set of factors could be worked out which would correspond to the actual results obtained with mixed rations. These, however, if successfully obtained, would be substantially identical with the results given on previous pages for the apparent metabolizable energy of total or of digestible organic matter, and it does not appear that the former would offer sufficient advantages over the latter to justify the labor involved in their computation. CHAPTER XI. INTERNAL WORK. § 1. The Expenditure of Energy by the Body. Havine considered the food in the light of a supply of energy to the animal, it now becomes desirable to take a more general view of the subject and inquire into the uses to which the energy of the food is applied in the organism. We have already. distinguished between that portion of the potential energy of the food which is convertible into kinetic energy in the body, and which we have here called metabolizable energy, and that portion of it which is rejected for one reason or another in the potential form in the various excreta. This latter portion we may dismiss from consideration for the present. The former portion—the metabolizable energy—as common experience informs us, is applied to two main purposes. First, it supplies the energy for carrying on the various activities of the body. Second, if the supply is in excess of the requirements of the body a portion of it may temporarily escape conversion into the kinetic form and be stored up as gain of tissue, notably of fat. We may say briefly, then, that the metabolizable energy of the food is used, first, for the production of “ physiological work” and second, for the storage of energy. Physiological Work.—The term “physiological work” in the previous sentence is employed in a somewhat loose and general sense to designate all those activities in the body which are sus- tained by the metabolizable energy of the food and whose ultimate result is the production of heat or motion. A more definite idea of what the term includes may be gained by a consideration of the chief factors which go to make up the physiological work of the body. , 336 INTERNAL WORK. 337 Work oF THE VoLUNTARY MusciEs.—The most obvious form of physiological work is that performed by the contraction of the voluntary muscles, either in the performance of useful work or in the various incidental movements made during the waking hours. In a sense the production of muscular work may be said to be the chief end of the metabolizable energy of the food, inasmuch as all the other activities of the body (apart from the reproductive functions and, of course, from mental activities) are accessory to this. In amount, however, the energy of muscular work is much less than the energy expended in other forms of physiological work and consumes a comparatively small percentage of the metaboliz- able energy of the food. InTERNAL Work.—The body of an animal in what we commonly speak of as a state of rest is still performing a large amount of work. The most evident forms of this are the work of circulation and res- piration. In addition to these, however, there are less obvious kinds of work whose total is probably very considerable. The body is an aggregate of living cells. The living cell, however, is constantly carrying on activities of various sorts, and these activities require a supply of energy, although how much of the energy of the food is consumed in the various processes of secretion, osmosis, karyoki- nesis, etc., it is difficult to say. In the numerous varieties of internal work the energy involved passes through various forms. Ultimately, however, since it accomplishes no work upon the surroundings of the animal, it is converted into heat and leaves the body either by radiation and conduction, as the latent heat of water vapor or as the sensible heat of the excreta. Work or DicEsTion AND ASSIMILATION.—Logically the work of digestion and assimilation would be classed as part of the internal work of the body, but motives of convenience make it desirable to consider it separately. In a fasting animal, with the digestive tract empty, the various forms of internal work indicated above go on with a considerable degree of constancy, and the resulting heat production is quite uniform under like conditions. If food be given to such an animal there results very. promptly an increase in the excretion of carbon 338 PRINCIPLES OF maNIMAl NUTRITION. dioxide and the absorption-of oxygen and in the amount of heat | browsed “In general terms this i is ee about i in four ways: an expenditure of energy which finally gives rise ae ‘the evolution of heat. Second, the activity of the various-secreting glands of the diges- tive tract is stimulated, again making a demand for energy and giving rise to an increased heat production. Third, the work of the resorbing cells likewise makes demand. for energy. Fourth, the various fermentations, cleavages, hydrations,. and syntheses which-the food-ingredients 1 under: rgo_in in the course of diges-- tion, resorption, and. -assimilation may occasion in individual cases. either an ‘evolution or an absorption of energy, but taken as a whole result in the e production ¢ of a greater or less amount of heat and con- sume a corresponding amount of the metabolizable energy of the food. Propuction or Hzat.—The body temperature of the healthy warm-blooded animal is practically constant, any considerable variation from the average indicating some serious disturbance of the animal economy. Since this temperature is ordinarily higher than that of the environment, a continual production of heat is necessary to maintain it. As stated above, the various forms of internal work, including the work of digestion and assimilation, give rise in the aggregate to the evolution of a large amount of heat, and this heat is of course: Whether its amount is sufficient for this pandeee or whether under any or all circumstances there is a production of heat for its. own sake, simply to keep the animal warm, is still a debatable question. Many- eminent physiologists, notably Chauveau and his associates, hold that the primary function of metabolism is to. furnish energy for the physiological processes going on in the body. They hold that the potential energy of the food is converted imme- diately into some form of physiological energy, which in its turn, in fulfilling its functions, is converted into heat which serves inci- dentally to maintain the body temperature. In other words, they regard heat as substantially an excretion and would consider that INTERNAL WORK. 339 in the course of organic evolution those forms have survived in which the incidental heat production was sufficient to meet the demand of the environment. Other physiologists no less eminent hold that at least an ex- ceptional demand for heat (low external temperature) may be met by a direct combustion of food or body material for that purpose. We shall have oceasion later to give further consideration to these divergent views. Summary.—The following scheme may serve to summarize what has been said above regarding the uses to which the energy of the food is put in the body, the possible direct heat production being considered, for convenience, as part of the physiological work of the body in order to include it among the other forms of the expenditure of energy: Energy of excreta, Work of voluntary muscles. Gross energy Physiological | Internal work. Metabolizable work energy Work of digestion and assimilation. Heat production. Storage of energy. For the sake of directness of statement, language has been used above which seems to imply that the food is directly oxidized some- what like the fuel in a locomotive. While statistically the effect is the same as if this were the case, it must not be forgotten that the body itself constitutes a reservoir of potential energy and that the energy liberated in its various activities comes primarily from the potential energy stored up in its various tissues, while the func- tion of the food is to make good the Joss’ this occasioned. The metabolism of matter and energy in the body might be compared to the exchange of water in a mill-pond. The water in the pond may represent the materials of the body itself, while the water running in at the upper end represents the supply of matter and energy in the food, and that going down the flume to the mill- wheel the metabolism required for the production of physiological work as above defined. The water flowing into the pond does not immediately turn the wheel, but becomes part of the pond and loses its identity. Part of it may be drawn into the main current 34° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. and enter the flume comparatively soon, while another part may remain in the pond for a long time. Pursuing the comparison still further, as but a small proportion of the energy liberated in the de- scent of the water in the flume takes the form of mechanical energy, most of it being converted into heat, so in the body but a small proportion of the energy expended in physiological work takes ultimately the form of mechanical energy. Finally, if we compare the flow of water in the stream below the dam to the heat produc- tion of the body, that flow may be increased, in case of need, in two ways, viz., by opening the gate wider and letting more water pass through the flume (increase of physiological work) or by lowering the dam and allowing more water to flow over, corresponding to a heat production for its own sake, if such takes place. The succeeding sections of this chapter will be devoted to a con- sideration of the expenditure of energy in the various forms of in- ternal work, including that of digestion and assimilation, while the subjects of the production of external work and of! the storage of energy may be more appropriately considered in subsequent chap- ters. § 2. The Fasting Metabolism. If an animal be deprived of food for a sufficient length of time to empty the digestive tract, and kept in a state of rest as regards muscular exertion, the expenditure of energy in external work and in the work of digestion and assimilation are both eliminated, while there can be, of course, no storage of energy. Under these condi- tions the metabolism of energy in the organism is confined to the maintenance of those essential vital activities which were grouped above under the term “internal work” in the narrower sense, to- gether with any direct production of heat for its own sake. The fasting animal, then, affords the most favorable opportunity to study the laws governing the expenditure of energy for the internal work of the body. The fasting metabolism has already been con- sidered in Part I from the side of the matter involved; here we are concerned with its energy relations. Nature of Demands for Energy. Without attempting to enter into details, it may be said that the internal work of the fasting organism may be roughly classified INTERNAL WORK. 341 as muscular, glandular, and cellular. To the demand for energy for these purposes we have probably to add, at least in some cases, a direct demand for heat production. MuscuLar Work.—The more obvious forms of muscular work in the quiescent animal are circulation and respiration. To these are to be added as minor factors any movements of other in- ternal organs, and especially the general tonus of the muscular system, while finally, the various incidental movements made by such an animal, although not logically belonging in the category of internal work, practically have to be classed there in actual experimentation. It would be aside from the purpose of this volume to enter into any detailed consideration of these forms of internal work, but a few general statements regarding their amount may be of interest. Circulation.—The work performed by the heart is determined by two factors, viz., the weight of the blood moved and the mean arterial pressure overcome. Quite divergent results have been ob- tained by various investigators for the former factor, while the latter is more readily determinable. Zuntz & Hagemann * estimate the output of blood by the heart of the horse from a comparison between the blood gases and the respiratory exchange, and compute the expenditure of energy in circulation to be 5.01 per cent. of the total metabolism of the horse in a state of rest and 3.77 per cent. during moderate work. Hill ¢ estimates the average work of the heart in man at about 24,000 kilogram-meters in twenty-four hours. As the velocity of the circulation increases, the friction in the pe- ripheral blood-vessels, and consequently the arterial pressure, rap- idly augments, so that in case of severe muscular exertion, for ex- ample, the work of the heart may readily become excessive. Respiration.—The work of respiration consists essentially of an expansion of the thorax against the resistance caused by the. atmospheric pressure and the elasticity of the lungs and the rib cartilages. Zuntz & Hagemann { estimate its amount in the horse at about 4.7 per cent. of the total metabolism. Muscular Tonus.—As was pointed out in Chapter VI, the living * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. III, 371. } Schiffer’s Text-book of Physiology, II, 43. t Loe. cit. 342 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. muscle is in a constant state of slight tension or tonus, and is con- stantly the seat of metabolic activities which we may presume serve, in part at least, to maintain that tonus. This is, of course, equivalent to saying that there is a continual liberation of kinetic energy in the resting muscle, which temporarily takes the form of muscular elasticity but ultimately appears as heat. As to the amount of energy thus liberated exact information seems to be lack- ing, but in view of the relatively large mass of the muscles as com- pared with that of the other active tissues we may assume that it is not inconsiderable. The same thing would seem to be indicated also, as noted in Chapter VI (p. 191), by the great decrease in the metabolism and heat production ordinarily observed as the result of paralysis of the motor nerves by curari. Incidental Muscular Work.—It is rare that an animal, even when at rest in the ordinary sense, does not execute more or less motions of various parts of the body, all of which involve a conver- sion of potential energy into the kinetic form. Even apparently insignificant movements may materially increase the amount of metabolism. Zuntz & Hagemann,* for example, report a respira- tion experiment upon a horse in which the uneasiness caused by the presence of a few flies in the chamber of the apparatus caused an increase of over 10 per cent. in the metabolism. Johanson, Lan- dergren, Sonden & Tigerstedt,t in two-hour periods, found the fol- lowing average and minimum values per day and kilogram weight for the excretion of carbon dioxide by a fasting man during sleep, the results plainly showing the increased metabolism due to rest- lessness: | Average, | Minimum, Grms. Grms. Third day (first day of fasting) ............. 7.296 6.744 OUT ges cosas heey potencies ie ust ate Susan dSae VE 7.704 6.768 Fifth ‘ (very restless) .................. 8.136 7.524 SIGH 8 ea chaning ems mmaee aaa Mae eas 7.488 6.684 Seventh vc. woes ce eee dk eae sees ea wey 7.212 6.564 Subsequently Johanson { compared the excretion of carbon dioxide by a fasting man when simply lying in bed (awake) with * Landw. Jahrb., 28, 161. t Skand. Arch. f. Physiol., 7, 29. t Ibid., 8, 85. INTERNAL WORK. 343 that obtained when all the muscles were as perfectly relaxed as possible. The results per hour were: Lying in bed ................0.. 24.94 grams Complete muscular relaxation..... 20.72“ Furthermore, there is more or less muscular exertion involved during the waking hours in maintaining the relative position of the different members of the body. This is notably true of the effort of standing. In experiments with the respiration-calorimeter under the writer’s direction* the heat production of a steer per minute while standing and lying was found to be approximately as follows: Lying, Standing, Ratio, Lyi Cals. Cals. “Bilading. Batiod Mel wadenadan! 5.322 7.031 131.321 BS ED or se acess ceca 5.781 . 7.700 1: 1.332 GIG pn scoatlonnareuantt 6.310 8.177 1 : 1.296 HO SD atest aiciee 6.605 8.495 1 : 1,286 Zuntz + found an even greater difference in the case of the dog, the average oxygen consumption per minute being— Lying as aie ieee ors ce eee 174.3 ec. Standing. 6 ssh 0k ose ease Reece 245.6 “ In experiments of any considerable duration on normal animals it is impossible to avoid more or less expenditure of energy in this incidental muscular work, while it is often a matter of difficulty to make the different periods of an experiment comparable in this respect. GLANDULAR WorkK.—The activity of the.various secretory, ab- sorptive, and excretory organs may be conveniently summarized under this head. While the purpose of the glandular metabolism is, in the majority of cases, primarily a chemical one, the accom. plishment of this purpose involves an expenditure of energy which, * Proc. Soc Prom. Agr. Sci , 1902. + Arch. ges. Physiol , 68, 191. 344 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. so far as it is not removed from the body in the potential form in the secretions or excretions, ultimately takes the form of heat. Moreover, the fundamental features of glandular metabolism appear to be indentical with those of muscular metabolism. Thus Henderson * has shown that the active submaxillary gland of the dog does not lose nitrogen as compared with the inactive gland, but does lose weight, evidently from the metabolism of non- nitrogenous matter. Similarly, Bancroft t found the respiratory exchange of the same gland during activity to be three or four times that during rest. If we may accept these results as typical, we must conclude that glandular, like muscular metabolism is largely at the expense of non-nitrogenous matter, and shall not hesitate to summarize the two together as parts of the internal work of the body. CELLULAR Worx.—While both muscular and glandular work are forms of cell activity, a passing mention may be made for the sake of completeness of such processes as imbibition, filtration, osmosis, protoplasmic motion, karyokinesis, etc., which, while taking place in the various organs, are so general in their nature and form so essential a part of our conception of cell life that it seems proper to speak of them collectively as cellular work. As to the quantitative importance of these activities, so far as they can be differentiated from the special functions of the various organs, we lack the data for forming any definite conception, although it would appear that it must be small. Heat Production. As we have just seen, the forms of internal work are numerous and some of them are not readily accessible to measurement. All of them, however, have this in common, that the energy used in their performance ultimately assumes the form of heat. . This being the case, while the single factors making up the internal work are not readily determined, a determination of the total heat produced by a fasting animal in a state of rest (either directly or by computation from the amount and kind-of matter metabolized) will show the total amount of energy consumed in the * Am. Jour. Physiol., 8, 19. ft Journal of Physiol , 27, 31. INTERNAL WORK. 345 performance of the internal work and how it varies under varying conditions. Carnivorous animals, with their short and relatively simply digestive canal, lend themselves most readily to experiments of this sort although rabbits and guinea-pigs have been employed to some extent, as well as, for short periods, men. Constancy Under Uniform Conditions. — Attention has al- ready been called in Chapter IV to the relative constancy of the total metabolism of the fasting animal, particularly as compared with the total mass of active tissue in the body. This constancy has been especially emphasized by Rubner,* and forms the basis of his determinations of the replacement values of the several nutrients which will be considered in the following chapter. With a rabbit the following daily averages, computed per 100 parts of nitrogen in the body, were obtained: Day of Experiment. | Nitrogen a Metatolized. Third to éighth........... arse 2.16 16.2 Ninth to fifteenth.............. 2.19 13.8 Since the ratio of proteids to fat metabolized did not vary greatly in these trials, the total amount of carbon dioxide ex- creted may be taken as an approximately accurate measure of the total metabolism. For the several days of the experiment, this was as follows: Carbon Dioxide Excreted. 3 gaa nie ay. eight, a Per Head, Live Woe, Grms. Grms. PG jana ca. tonne daa aek mele 2091 “36.1 17.26 Seventhie inosine sacs alent we aa 2002 31.8 15.90 Ninth....... We oy Sielia Ghee oo Spa's 1907 30.3 15.90 Tenth... .ccsucwks sees redeesiny 1864 29.2 15.65 "TP WOLEGHY «5g 350 inne. 8S wear 8 Ash mms oes 1764 30.2 17.18 Thirteenth .... 1731 27.4 15.81 Fourteenth 1716 27.4 15.95 Pifteenthives ois civ. 948 Swine............. 20.1 128 19.1 1078 Ma pes cs ceo 9-4 dee 2 14.3 64.3 32.1 1042 DOGS ielsss sean ie nec 18.0 15.2 51.5 1039 Rabbit............ 18.2 2.3 75.1 776 Goose............. 15.0 3.5 66.7 967 B= (-) | en nee ree 18.5 2.0 71.0 943 With the exception of the rabbit, the average heat production of these various animals per unit of surface does not show any greater variations than have been observed between different animals of the same species, more or less of which, as we have seen, can probably be accounted for by errors in the estimate of the surface of the body. Accepting the fact of the general proportionality of heat pro- duction to surface, and passing over for the moment the excep- tional case of the rabbit, it is plain that the considerations which have been adduced in discussing the results upon the same * Loc. cit., p. 120. 37° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. species will in the main apply to a comparison of different species. It is true that what data we have indicate that there may be more or less difference between the critical temperatures for different species, but in view of the enormous range in the size of the animals experimented on this cannot largely modify the results. Any reasonable assumptions as to critical temperatures and as to rates of variation per degree in heat production would still leave the corrected results substantially proportional to the surface. Appar- ently we must conclude that in all these different species, as well as in larger and smaller animals of the same species, the internal work, as measured by the total metabolism at the critical tem- perature, is substantially proportional to the surface. How generally this may be true we have at present no means of judging. It is clear, however, that in the process of organic evolution one of the very important factors has been the demand for heat exerted by the environment upon the animal. This has been met to some extent by modifications in the coat of the animal, but to a-very large degree by changes in the rate of heat produc- tion, with the result that, other things being equal, those forms have survived whose normal heat production, resulting from internal work alone, was sufficient to maintain their temperature under the average conditions surrounding them without, on the one hand, calling largely into play the processes of “chemical” regulation, nor, on the other hand, producing so much heat as to render it. difficult for the body to get rid of it. Retation or Heat Propuction to Mass or Tissuz.—As already indicated, E. Voit, in his article cited above, has shown that while the heat production is in general proportional to the sur- face, there is also another determining factor, viz., the mass of the active cells in the organism, a rough measure of which is the total nitrogen of the body exclusive of that of the bones and the skin. This conclusion is based chiefly on experiments with fasting animals. As the weight of such an animal decreases, its relative surface must: increase, and, as was shown on p. 364, probably more rapidly than in proportion to the two-thirds power of the weight. Under these circumstances we should naturally expect that the relative heat production would increase, but as a matter of fact it rather shows: a tendency to decrease. E. Voit, in discussing the results of Rubner INTERNAL WORK. 371 and others, computes the heat production per unit of surface, and also compares it with the amount of nitrogen computed to be present in the organs of the animal on the several days of the ex- periment. The following results of one of Rubner’s experiments with rabbits are typical of those obtained in this way: Heat Production per Day. eiynage Day of Fasting. Weight, ge Per 100 Grms. Total, | Per Kg.. | Meter of | Nitrogen, Cals. Cals. Surface, Cals. Cals. Third ain sew RENE NaN ee ore 2185 155 71.0 730 310 UGH, esha hic od a dS 2093 117 55.9 556 243 Seventh deg: dase) Ddeshaneieo ts Wasalsal mney, 2007 102 50.8 499 220 ANIC oc icces ois igre avg aan ) 1923 97 50.5 488 221 Tenth and twelfth ......... 1841 95 51.6 494 227 Thirteenth and fourteenth ..)- 1735 88 50.7 463 222 Fifteenth and sixteenth ....| 1646 81 49.2 452 218 Seventeenth and eighteenth) 1507 72 47.8 428, 219 The heat production per unit of surface is seen to decrease at first rapidly and later more slowly, while the heat production per unit of weight shows but a slight decrease and that per unit of nitrogen scarcely any. From these and other similar results, Voit concludes that the law of the proportionality of heat production to surface as enunciated by Rubner and as extended by himself must be limited in its application to animals in like bodily condition, and that an animal with a low stock of nitrogenous tissue will, under the same conditions, show a lower heat production per unit of surface than a well-nourished animal. The exceptionally low average for the rabbit noted on p. 369 he explains on this hypoth- esis as resulting from the frequent use for such experiments of animals in a poorly nourished and “degenerate” condition re- sulting from long confinement. The result has an interesting bearing in another direction. Most of the experiments cited by Voit were probably made at tem- peratures below the critical points’ for the several animals. In our previous discussion we have assumed that under these circum- stances the heat regulation i is accomplished largely by “ chemical” means—by variations in the rate of production. In these experi- 372 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ments, on the contrary, since the heat production decreased along with the decrease of nitrogenous tissue, we see the regulation of body temperature effected by a diminution in the rate of emission of heat, which, however, was in most cases less marked than in the instance just cited. Either we must conclude that the abnormal condition arising from fasting enables the animal to diminish the rate of emission of heat to an extent not possible to the well- nourished one, or we may suppose that in the latter case the stimu- lation of the metabolism by the abstraction of heat begins before the possibilities of “physical” regulation have been exhausted; that, in other words, the domains of “chemical” and “ physical” regulation overlap. Obviously the latter conclusion is entirely in harmony with v. Hésslin’s views as stated on pp. 367-8. § 3. The Expenditure of Energy in Digestion and Assimilation. General Conception. Foop Increases Metasoiism.—That the consumption of food increases the metabolism and consequent heat production in the body has been known since the time of Lavoisier, who observed the oxygen consumption of man to increase materially (about 37 per cent.) after a meal. Regnault & Reiset * also, among their respiration experiments on animals, report the following results for the oxygen consumption of two rabbits while fasting and after eating: ee DN oss gs dite Ses 2.518 3.124 Bag exe negaes 2.731 3.590 Subsequent investigations by Vierodt, Smith, Speck, Fredericq, v. Mehring & Zuntz, Wolfers, Potthast, Hanriot & Richet,t Magnus- Levy, Zuntz & Hagemann, Laulanié, and others, some of which will be considered more specifically in subsequent paragraphs, have fully confirmed these earlier results, so that the fact of an increased met- abolism consequent upon the ingestion of food is undisputed. * Ann, de Chim. et de Phys. (3), 26, 414. t Ibid, (6), 22, 520. INTERNAL WORK. 373 CausE OF THE INCREASE.—Two possible explanations of the above fact naturally suggest themselves, viz., that, on the one hand, the more abundant supply of food material to the cells of the body may act as a direct stimulus to the metabolic processes, or, on the other hand, that the increased metabolism may arise from the greater activity of the organs of digestion, or finally, that both causes may act simultaneously. The results obtained by Speck,* who found that the increase began very promptly (within thirty minutes) after a meal, would indicate that it can hardly be due to a stimulating action of the _ resorbed food upon the general metabolism, but must arise, in large part at least, from the activity of the digestive organs. Specific investigations upon this point were undertaken by Zuntz & v. Mehring.t They found that glycerin, sugar, egg-albumin, puri- fied peptones, and the sodium salts of lactic and butyric acids { when injected into the circulation caused no material increase in the amount of oxygen consumed as determined in successive short periods by the Zuntz form of respiration apparatus. It is well estab- lished that some of these substances do increase the metabolism when given by the mouth, and the authors verified this fact for sugar and for sodium lactate and likewise showed that substances like sodium sulphate, which are not metabolized in the body, caused a similar rise in the metabolism when introduced into the digestive tract. They therefore conclude that the effect of the ingestion of food upon the metabolism is due chiefly to the expenditure of energy required in its digestion. Wolfers § and Potthast,|| in experiments sup- plementary to those just mentioned, obtained confirmatory results. On the other hand, Laulanié,{ in the experiments mentioned on p. 180 in their bearings upon the formation of fat from carbo- hydrates, obtained almost as marked an increase in the oxygen consumption subsequent to the injection of sugar into the circula- tion as after its administration by the mouth. * Arch, exper. Pathol. and Pharm.., I, 1874, p. 405. + Arch. ges. Physiol., 15, 634; 82, 173. } The results of their experiments upon organic acids have already been cited in Chapter V, p. 157, in another connection. § Arch. ges. Physiol., 32, 222. \| Ibid., 32, 280. { Archives de Physiol., 1896, p. 791. 374 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. On the whole, however, and in view of the patent fact that the activity of the digestive apparatus consequent upon the consump- tion of food must lead to an expenditure of energy, the results of Zuntz & v. Mehring appear to have been generally accepted as proof that it is this influence rather than any direct effect of the resorbed food upon the metabolism to which the increase of the latter after a meal is to be ascribed. This increased expenditure is often, although rather loosely, spoken of as the “work of digestion.” Factors or Work or Drcesrion.—In the process of digestion we are probably safe in assuming that the muscular work of pre- hension, mastication, deglutition, rumination, peristalsis, etc., con- stitutes an important source of heat production. A secondary source of heat production, which we may designate as glandular metabolism, is the activity of the various secretory glands which provide the digestive juices, to which may be added also the work of the resorptive mechanisms. Furthermore, the various processes of solution, hydration, cleavage, etc., which the nutrients undergo during digestion contribute their share to the general thermic effect. Fermentations—To the above general sources of heat produc- tion during the digestive process, there is to be added as a very important one in the case of ruminating animals the extensive fer- mentation which the carbohydrates of the food undergo. We have already seen that a considerable fraction of the gross energy of these bodies is carried off in the potential form in the combustible gases produced. A further portion is liberated as heat of fermentation. This latter portion forms a part of the metabolizable energy of the food as defined in the preceding chapter, since it assumes the kinetic form in the body. Since, however, it appears immediately as heat, it can be of use to the body only indirectly, as an aid in maintaining its temperature. While, therefore, it does not constitute work in the strict sense of the term, the heat produced by fermentation constitutes a part of the expenditure of metabolizable energy in digestion, and therefore is included under the term “work of diges- tion” in the general sense in which the term is frequently used. Warming Ingesta.—The food, and particularly the water, con- sumed by an animal have to be warmed to the temperature of the body. To the extent that this warming of the ingesta is accom- plished at the expense of the heat generated by the muscular, gland- INTERNAL WORK. 375 ular, and fermentative actions indicated above, it does not call for any additional expenditure of energy and so does not, from the statistical point of view, constitute part of the “work of digestion.” If, however, at any time the warming of the ingesta requires more heat than is produced by these processes—if, for example, a large amount of very cold water is consumed—it is evident that the surplus energy required will be withdrawn from the stock otherwise available for other purposes, and to this extent will increase the expenditure of energy consequent upon digestion. Tue EXPENDITURE OF ENERGY IN ASSIMILATION.—While our knowledge of the changes which the nutrients undergo after re- sorption is very meager, we may regard it as highly probable that they undergo important transformations before they are fitted to serve directly as sources of energy for those general vital activities of the body represented in gross by the fasting metabolism. Thus the proteoses and peptones produced in the course of digestive proteolysis are synthesized again to proteids, while the proteids, when the supply is large, undergo, as was shown in Chap- ter V, rapid nitrogen cleavage, leaving a non-nitrogenous residue as a source of energy. According to some authorities, as we have seen, the resorbed fat undergoes conversion into dextrose in the liver before entering into the general metabolism of the body. Even the carbohydrates, at least so far as they are not clirectly resorbed as dextrose, seem to undergo more or less transformation before entering into the general circulation. In brief, there seems good reason to believe that the crude mate- rials resulting from the digestion of the food undergo more or less extensive chemical transformations before they are ready to serve as what Chauveau calls the “potential” of the body—that is, as the immediate source of energy for the vital functions. Of the nature and extent of these transformations we are largely ignorant. So far as they are katabolic in their nature, a liberation of energy is necessarily involved. Any anabolic processes of course would absorb energy, but the energy so absorbed must come ultimately from the katabolism of other matter, and in all probability there would be more or less escape of kinetic energy in the process. Moreover, as was pointed out in the opening paragraphs of Chapter II in discussing the general nature of metabolism, as well 376 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. as in the Introduction, the vital activities are intimately connected with the kataboliec processes going on in the protoplasm of the cells. As was there stated, it is highly probable that the molecules of the protoplasm are much more complex than those of the pro- teids, fat and carbohydrates of the food (compare pp. 17 and 224), To what extent it is necessary that the resorbed nutrients shall be synthesized to these more complex compounds hefore they can serve the purposes of the organism we are hardly in position to say, but so far as it is required it can be accomplished only by an expenditure of energy derived ultimately from the food and con- stituting a part, and not impossibly a large part, of the work of assimilation. Summary.— The considerations of the foregoing paragraphs make it plain that the exercise of the function of nutrition, as is the case with the other functions of the body, involves the expenditure of energy. In general, we may say that this energy is expended for the two purposes indicated in the title of this section, viz., for diges- tion, or the transformation of the crude materials of the food and their transference to the fluids of the body, and for assimilation, or the conversion of these resorbed materials into the “potential” of the organism. Each of these two general purposes is served by a va- riety of processes, and the attempt to assign to each its exact share in the increased metabolism brought about by the ingestion of food is a physiological problem at once interesting and complicated. For our present purpose, however, viz., a consideration from the statistical point of view of the income and expenditure of energy by the organism, we are concerned primarily with the total ex- penditure. caused by the ingestion of food rather than with the single factors composing it. As a matter of convenience it may be permissible to retain the designation above given, viz., the work of digestion and assimilation, but it should not be forgotten that other processes may conceivably be concerned in the matter. In par- ticular, any increased heat production resulting from a direct stimu- lation of the metabolic processes or of the incidental muscular activity of the animal by the resorbed food, such for example, as Zuntz & Hagemann * have observed with the horse as a result of abundant feeding, particularly with Indian corn, would be included under the term as here used. * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. III, 234 and 259. a INTERNAL WORK. 377 Experimental Results. General Methods.—It follows from what has been said above that two general methods, or more properly two modifications of one general method, may be employed to determine the total ex- penditure of energy due to the ingestion of food. First, since the energy expended in the various processes out- lined above is ultimately converted into heat, we may determine the heat production of the animal while fasting and compare with it the heat production during the digestion and assimilation of a known amount of food. The excess of heat produced in the latter case as compared with the former will represent the increased expendi- ture of energy in the work of digestion and assimilation. Second, we may determine the total income and outgo of energy in the fasting and in the fed animal by one of the methods indicated in Chapter VIII. In this case the extent to which the net loss of energy by the body has been diminished by means of the food will show how much of the metabolizable energy of the latter has been utilized by the organism in place of that previously drawn from the metabolism of tissue. The part of the metabolizable energy not thus utilized has obviously been expended in some of the various operations of digestion, assimilation, etc. The two methods are com- plementary, in the one case the expenditure for digestion, assimila- tion, etc., being determined directly and in the other by difference. A point of some importance, at least logically, is that the deter- minations should be made below the point of maintenance. The term assimilation as above defined includes all those processes by which the resorbed nutrients are prepared for their final metabo- lism in the performance of the vital functions. When we give food in excess of the maintenance requirement, however, there is added to this the set of processes by which the excess food is converted into suitable forms for more or less temporary storage in the body. These may be presumed to consume energy, and as it would seem, to a more or less variable extent. At any rate, we have no right to assume in advance that the relative expenditure of en- ergy above the maintenance point in the storage of excess material is the same as that below the maintenance point for the processes of assimilation as above defined. In other words, it is not necessa- rily nor even, it would seem, probably the case that the resorbed 378 PRINCIPLES OF ‘ANIMAL NUTRITION. portion of a maintenance ration is first converted into the same materials (particularly fat) that are deposited in the body when excess food is given, and that these materials are then metabolized in the performance of the bodily functions. It is at least conceiv- able, if not likely, that a much less profound transformation, and one involving a smaller loss of energy, suffices to prepare the re- sorbed nutrients for their functions as “potential” than is required’ for their storage as gain of tissue. Finally, the comparison need not necessarily be made, and in- deed in case of most agricultural animals cannot well be made, with the fasting state. While this method is the simpler when practi- cable, a comparison of the total heat production or of the balance of energy on two different rations (both being less than the mainte- nance requirement) will afford the data for a computation by differ- ence (exactly similar to that employed in the determination of metabolizable energy in Chapter X) of the expenditure of energy in the digestion and assimilation of the food added to the basal ration. The most important quantitative investigations upon the work of digestion are those of Magnus-Levy * on the dog and on man, and those of Zuntz & Hagemann f{ upon the horse. Experiments on the Dog.—In Mapnus-Levy’s experiments the respiratory exchange of the animal was determined by means of the Zuntz apparatus at intervals of one or two hours during fasting and after feeding. The single periods were twenty-five to thirty minutes long, and the external conditions were maintained as uniform as possible. Fat.—Fat (in the form of bacon free from visible lean meat), when given in quantities not materially exceeding in heat value the fasting metabolism, resulted in a slight increase of the latter, beginning about one to three hours after eating, reaching its maxi- mum between the fifth and ninth hours, and disappearing about the twelfth hour. The maximum increase observed was 12 per cent., seven hours after eating. In amounts largely exceeding the equiv- alent of the fasting metabolism the effect of fat was somewhat more marked and longer continued, a maximum increase of 19.5 per cent. being observed in one case seven hours after eating, while * Arch. ges. Physiol., 55, 1. ft Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. III. INTERNAL WORK. ; 379 the metabolism was still slightly above its fasting value after eight- een hours. The respiratory quotient in every case sank to a value closely corresponding to that for the oxidation of pure fat. The experiments do not permit an exact estimate of the total increase of the metabolism during the twenty-four hours, since the observations were not always made at hourly intervals and but few of the trials extended over a full day. By selecting, however, the two in which the data are most complete and com- puting as accurately as may be the average rate of consumption of oxygen per minute, it is possible to obtain an approximate expression for the total heat production. For this purpose the average oxygen per minute is multiplied by 1440 and this product by the calorific equivalent of the oxygen, viz., 3.27 Cals. per gram in this case, and the following results obtained, the heat production during fasting being in each instance that found in the particular experiment under consideration: Heat Production in 24 Hours. Fat Energy No. of : Eaten, f Food, I . Experiment. Grms’ | Cals.’ | Fasting, | With —— Cals.” Heed Per Cent ais. er . Cals. of Food. 100: dccex ea tere ss 131.6 1250 972 991 19 1.53 64 and 68....... 305.5 2902 1055 1142 87 2.99 CARBOHYDRATES.—Carbohydrates produced a more marked effect upon the metabolism than did fat, and one which showed itself more promptly. In the experiments on the dog the food consisted of rice, either alone or with the addition of small amounts of fat, sugar, or meat; in other words, the animal was on a mixed diet in which carbohydrates predominated. On the average of a series of six experiments in which the food consisted of 500 grams of rice, 200 grams of meat, and 25 grams of fat, the metabolism increased by fully 30 per cent. within the first hour and continued to increase more slowly until the maximum of 39 per cent. was reached at the sixth to eighth hour. From that time it decreased to 25 per cent. in the twelfth hour and then rather suddenly dropped nearly to the fasting value. The respiratory quotient rose from 0.78 during fasting to 0.90 in the first hour, and 380 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. reached very nearly 1.00 by the third hour, remaining at substan- tially this value for sixteen to eighteen hours and not falling to the fasting value in twenty-four hours. Two parallel experiments in which 400 grams of meat were fed showed that a part, but by no means all, of the above increase was to be ascribed to the 200 grams of meat. The small amount of fat given can hardly have affected the result. The author estimates that of the total calculated in- crease of 22 per cent. over the fasting metabolism about 5 per cent. may have been due to the proteids of the food and the remainder to the carbohydrates. This conclusion is confirmed by the results of two experiments in which rice, sugar, and fat were given. The increase in the metabolism was of precisely the same character as in the other experiments, but less in amount. In all these experiments the food was in excess of the fasting metabolism. In another series in which the food, consisting of rice, either alone or with a small amount of sugar, was about equivalent to the fasting metabolism, the increase in the metabolism was slightly less, although otherwise the results were similar to those of the other trials. Computing the results per twenty-four hours, as in the case of the fat, we have the following approximate figures for the three series: Heat Production in 24 Hours. Metab- oliza- No. of Food,* ble . Increase. Experiment. Grms. Enerey| Fast- | With Food.t| ang: | Heed Per Cals. a e Cals. | Cent. of Food. 68, 70, Proteids....... 71.3 ' 71, 73, Carbohydrates. . 375.0 2121 | 1040 | 1271 231 | 10.89- 74, and 7 Patio saaieyoe's 0 Proteids....... 28.1 84 and 87 <| Carbohydrates... 457.5 2226 | 1132 | 1292 160 7.19 Pat ads: ca eats 25.0 Proteids....... 18.75 107 ...... Loris yenaeen: 225.00 999 991 | 1080 89 8.91 Ub, cieiciera Guava sia ey setae Goo ‘ * Rice estimated to contain 75 per cent. carbohydrates and 1 per cent. nitrogen. { Computed by the writer, using Rubner’s factors. INTERNAL WORK. 381 Prorerps.—Proteids in the form of meat or a mixture of meat and flesh-meal, with in some cases small amounts of fat, caused a very marked and prompt increase in the metabolism of the dog. The maximum effect was usually reached about the third or fourth hour and continued with but slight diminution up to the seventh or eighth hour with small rations and as long as to the twelfth or fifteenth hour with large rations. As in the case of fat and carbo- hydrates, the increase was greater with large rations, but its amount largely exceeded that caused by either of the two former groups of nutrients, reaching in some cases 90 or more per cent. of the fasting value. The results were more irregular than in the preceding experi- ments, and were apparently influenced by a peculiar effect of the food upon the type of respiration. The author, however,* com- putes from three selected series of experiments the following approximate averages for the twenty-four hours: [Heat Production in 24 Hours. Proteids | ache No, of se is ue le Experiment. Grms. | of Food, | Fasting, | With fo Cals. Cals.” Food, (77> RO | ie, eae 83 and 89...... 82.5 338 1030 1086 56 16.57 102 “ 106...... 230.0 °943 963 1079 116 12.30 95 “ 96...... 370.6 1520 1059 1303 244 16.05 The amount of the proteid metabolism was not determined in these experiments, but the author points out that they were made on the first day of the feeding, and that it is probable that the proteid metabolism, and consequently the heat production, would have increased more or less had the feeding, particularly with excess of food, been continued longer. Bone, when fed in large quantities to the dog, was found to cause a greater increase in the metabolism than corresponded to the nitrogenous matter estimated to have been resorbed from it, and the difference is ascribed to the mechanical effect upon the digestive tract. * Loc. cit., p. 78. i 382 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Experiments on Man.—Magnus-Levy’s experiments upon man were made substantially like those upon the dog, the subject lying upon a sofa, as completely at rest as possible, and breathing through a mouth-piece. Fat.—Two experiments with fat, computed in the same way as those upon the dog, gave the following results: Heat Production in 24 Hours. Fat Energy 7 No. of Experiment. Eaten, | of Food, Increase. : Grms. Cals. Fasting With Cals.” pote ais. Per Cent. Cals. of Food. Slesigeacs wes 94.0 893 1537 1547 10 1.12 Be bate Nevcasisimesd’ | 195.6 1855 1524 1582 58 3.13 CARBOHYDRATES.—Numerous experiments on a man were made in which the diet consisted chiefly of bread, and a smaller number in which the effect of sugar was studied. With bread the increase in the metabolism was more prompt than in the experiments on the dog, but smaller in amount, varying from about 12 to as high as 33 per cent., according to the amount eaten. By the end of the third hour the effect had nearly disappeared, but it was then followed by a second increase, less in amount but continuing longer, which the author suggests may have been due to the commencement of intestinal digestion. With sugar (both cane and grape) the increase was equally prompt, although rather less in amount, but dis- appeared entirely after two or three hours. None of the experi- ments extended over more than ten hours and usually over less, and the data given are insufficient for a satisfactory computation of the total increase for the twenty-four hours. The respiratory quotient was considerably raised, but did not reach 1.00 in any case. ProtEips.—Experiments upon the effect of proteids on the respiratory exchange yielded results similar to those obtained with the dog, but do not permit of a satisfactory computation of averages for the twenty-four hours. Mixep Dier.—Results with a mixed diet the ingredients of which are not specified have been reported by Johansson, Lander- INTERNAL WORK. 383 gren, Sondén & Tigerstedt.* The experiments were made in a large Pettenkofer respiration apparatus and extended over twenty- two hours, the results being computed to twenty-four hours. The total heat production, as computed from the carbon and nitrogen balance, and the computed metabolizable energy of the food were: Energy of Food, Heat Production, als. Cals. First 0 C2) eee eee 4141.4 (2) aoe i shatarslaiaeiets nate 9 2705.3 Ose carats Wa 2220 .4 Fourth “ .......... 0 2102.4 Fifth Ee ot we aniseed oie 0 2024.1 A “ ces 2g 1970.8 Highth “ .......... 4355.9 2436.9 Ninth Bnd aclenaikcn baie 3946.4 2410.1 The above figures furnish a striking example of the constancy of the fasting metabolism, and of the marked increase brought about by the consumption of food. Omitting the results for the first day of fasting and for the first day of the experiment we obtain the following averages: Average energy of food ........... 4193.4 Gals. Metabolism : With food. ............00 eee eee 2517.4 “ ASEH es. es zane ace eel Acelasecene 2022.4 “ Increase. Lota. Ik 2A Sam atete none heen ae 495.0 “ Per cent. of food............-.. 11.76 Per cent. It is to be noted, however, that the food in this experiment was considerably in excess of the fasting requirements, so that there was a notable storage of material and energy in the body. Summary.—The results of the foregoing approximate computa- tions of the increased expenditure of energy for twenty-four hours are summarized in the following table, which also includes a com- parison of the metabolizable energy of the food with the fasting metabolism : * Skand. Arch. Physiol., 7, 29. 384 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Food, Cais. | Metgbolim. | eee 3 893 644 1.12 Experiments on man ....... § 1855 +331 3113 Ce ee 1250 +278 1.53 7 2902 +1847 2.99 AVETAZE 00... cece eeey A ere lista o arianavencbalone 2.19 Chiefly Carbohydrates : 2121 +1081 10.89 Experiments on dog........ 4|]- 2226 +1094 7.19 i 999 +8 8.91 Average seacsceavsneeeae ck [sawiewies seme |e eae enees 8.99 Proteids : : 338 —692 16.57 Experiments on dog......... 943 —20 12.30 1520 +461 16.05 IAVOTORG i256 354 ARRAS ee [BHROR ORES ew SE ETRE 14.97 Mized Diet : Experiments on man ......... 4193 +2171 11.76 It is clear that proteids caused the greatest increase in the metabolism and fat the least, while the carbohydrates occupied an intermediate position. In the case of fat the increase in the heat production seems to show a slight tendency to become greater with amounts of food largely in excess of the fasting metabolism, but with the carbohydrates and proteids no distinct effect of this sort is apparent. These results, particularly those on proteids, afford a good illus- tration of the fact that the increase in the heat production caused by the ingestion of food is not due solely to the increased muscular work involved, since if we were to suppose the latter to be the case it is not apparent why the proteids, which are digested pretty promptly and with comparative ease, should cause seven times as much work as the fats. “The results certainly suggest strongly that a large part of the heat production in the former case arises from the considerable chemical cleavage which the proteids undergo in digestion and still more from the stimulative effect of food proteids INTERNAL WORK. 385 on the nitrogen cleavage; in other words, that what was called on p. 375 the work of assimilation is an important factor. ReEsuLts on Fat.—The relatively small increase in the metabo- lism resulting from the ingestion of fat is worthy of notice as bear- ing upon the hypothesis, already several times referred to, that it undergoes a cleavage into dextrose, carbon dioxide, and water in the liver, and that the resulting dextrose is the material which serves as the source of potential energy for the general metabolism. As was pointed out in Chapter V (p. 153), however, the dextrose derived from one gram of fat according to the commonly accepted equation would contain about 6.1 Cals. of potential energy out of the 9.5 Cals. contained in the original fat. In other words, over one third of the energy of the fat would be liberated as heat in the intermediary metabolism supposed to take place in the liver. While the heat production was not directly measured in Magnus- Levy’s experiments, and while the method of computation em- ployed may be open to criticism in details, his results certainly fail to indicate any such large increase in the metabolism as this hypoth- esis would require. It should be noted, in conclusion, that the above experiments did not include a determination of the work of mastication and in- gestion of the food, and also that, according to the author, there was little if any production of fat in the experiments in which carbo- hydrates were fed. Experiments on the Horse.—Zuntz, Lehmann & Hagemann * have investigated the effect of digestive work and also of the masti- cation of the food on the metabolism of the horse, the respiratory exchange being determined by the Zuntz method and a correction made for the cutaneous and intestinal respiration. In addition to this, however, other data were secured which serve the authors as the basis for computations of the energy metabolism of the animal and of the available energy of the digested food. Since their most important conclusions as to digestive work are based in large part. on the results of these computations it is necessary to consider their method in some detail. Meruop or Computation.—At six different times between the * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp., III, pp. 271-285. 386 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. years 1888 and 1891 digestion experiments were made * in whick the total nitrogen metabolism + and the carbon of the food and of the visible excreta were determined. The ration in every case consisted of hay and a mixture of six parts of oats with one of cut: straw; the chemical composition of these feeds was quite similar in the several experiments, the greatest variation being in the last experiment (October 16-22, 1891). From the results of these experiments the metabolism of energy in the respiration experiments is computed in the following manner: First, the results of the several digestion experiments are com- bined in such a way as to give an average corresponding to the ration during the respiration experiment. E.g., in Period 1 (loc. cit., p. 256) the ration consisted of 6 kgs. of oats, 1 kg. of straw, and 6 kgs. of hay. As no single digestion experiment was made on just this ration, the results of the first one are taken four times, those of the second three times, and those of the third once, and the sums divided by eight. These averages are taken as representing the digestibility and the urinary carbon and nitrogen during the respiration experi- ment. Second, from the average carbon and nitrogen of the urine as thus obtained its content of urea and hippuric acid is computed, and from these data, on the assumption of average composition for the metabolized proteids, the portion of the elements of the latter completely oxidized in the body, from which again the amount of oxygen required and of carbon dioxide produced is computed. Third, from the computed amount of crude fiber digested, assuming it to have the composition C,H,;O, and that 100 grams yield 4.7 grams of methane, is computed the oxygen required for its oxidation and the carbon dioxide resulting. Fourth, after subtracting the amounts of oxygen and carbon dioxide, as above computed, corresponding to the proteids and crude fiber oxidized, from the totals found in the respiration experi- ment, the remainders are divided between fat and carbohydrates * Loc, cit., pp. 211-236. { The nitrogen of the feces was determined in the air-dried material. Subsequent experience has shown that there is some loss of nitrogen in air- drying. ( INTERNAL WORK. 387 in the manner described on page 76 on the assumption that the fat has the composition C 76.54 per cent., H 12.01 per cent., O 11.45 per cent., and the carbohydrates that of starch. Fifth, on the basis of the chemical processes thus computed the amount of energy set free is estimated from the known (average) heats of combustion of the materials oxidized. While the calculation involves numerous assumptions, and while, therefore, the result is of the nature of an approximation, most of the assumptions are so nearly correct as not to contain the possibility of serious error. The two which seem most questionable are the peculiar method of computing the digestibility of the food and the proteid metabolism, and the computation of the proximate composition of the urine. INFLUENCE oF Foop ConsuMPTION ON MetTaso.ism.—The influence of the ingestion of food in increasing the oxygen con- sumption and the energy metabolism of the animal is illustrated by the following tabulation of the results obtained in Period b (loc. cit., p. 282). (The animal was standing quietly, but otherwise was in a state of rest.) In the Morning, . . Later Stage After Fasting. Immediately After Feeding. First Feeding. Per Kg. Live Per Kg. Live Per Kg. Live Weight per Ss Feed Eaten. | Weight per iS Weight per | No. of Minute. a Minute. a Minute. @ Experiment. e. 4 4 ow ae os as oS iF: aZ aol ae asd aol aa oe Bo . | mS! Oats oa .( 82 ./ad| oe. Bo | ag mas 538 2! and | Hay, Se) has = we Bea ae K@°) 298 | 3” |Straw,|Grms pas aoS|3 | Kae] aes] 3 Os | mas ona O8 |m@2°}o |Os |Ra | 5 Ss) qa |e ? is) a |e is) A | ne 2300 | 1500]]......]...... .; 3.602/18.365] 3.5 ue 2300 | 1500J]......]...... 3.613/18.798) 2 10.5 10.5 10.5 11.0) 2100 | 1000 } 3.418/17.431] 0.6) 3.823/19.159! 4.5 10.5] 2280 | 1420 | 4.039)20.889] 0.8) 3.737/19.220) 4.5 11.0] 3180 3.745/18.913} 0.5) 3.739/19.304) 3.5 17.5] 3150 3.584]17.647| 0.6] 3.169]16.134) 4.0 og 2 AL 2BOO | LOO) ses ae ade cee s 3.564/18.318} 2.5 11.0] 2330 | 1430 | 3.716]18.931) 0.5 11.0 0 0 | 3.385]17.247| 0.5) 4.174)20.450/ 3.5 11.0 [8 |} 2500) wv aeals bees 3.914/19.333] 3.5 Averages ..| 3.339/16.929 |11.5] 2173 | 917 | 3.648/18.510) 0.6) 3.704/18.787| 3.5 * Animal was uneasy. 388 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The average energy metabolism thirty-six minutes after eating, computed as previously described, is somewhat more than 9 per cent. greater than that shortly before eating, and a still further increase was observed at the end of three hours. The effect is precisely similar to that observed in Magnus-Levy’s experiments. It was not, however, followed through the twenty-four hours, as in some of those experiments. Comparison or Hay anp Grain.—It was found further that coarse fodder (hay) produced a much more marked effect than did grain. The following comparison of the average of the experi- ments of Period c on an exclusive hay diet with that of Period f on a mixed ration illustrates this fact: Period c. Period }. Time since last fed .............- 2.6 hrs. 2.8 hrs. Ration: Hay occ ie eee tceaes fee About 10.5 kgs.* 4.75 kgs. OBES osc acasa bie a aveunsaie eevee ee = ae |El Oo alee sa Garde wee Nem 6.00 “ DURE Wiis ca a Mesa owen od wonmunye areal ie ee weaned oa waudiaraieléna 1.00 “ cara digested nutrients (fat x 5) Aighestiek oaeacawvase weld 4125 grms.f{ | 5697. grms.t Per Hous and minute: Oxygen consumed ............ 3.9837 c.c. 3.6986 c.c. Carbon dioxide given off ....... 3.6586 “ 3.6695 “ Energy set free (computed)..... 19.552 cals, 18.339 cals Notwithstanding the greater total weight of food consumed in Period 7, and the much larger amount of digestible matter contained in it, the oxygen consumption and the computed amount of energy liberated are notably greater in Period c, on the hay ration. The average time which had elapsed since the last feeding, as well as the external conditions, having been substantially the same in both periods,{ and the animal having been in a state of rest, the effect is ascribed to an increase in the expenditure of energy in diges- tion due to the difference in the physical properties of the two rations. This difference is chemically characterized by the greater * The exact amount of hay eaten is not stated. The digestible matter is computed from the composition of the hay by the use of Wolfi’s coeffi- cients, { Computed in the manner described above, p. 386. { It varied considerably in the individual experiments composing Period f. INTERNAL WORK. 389 proportion of crude fiber in the hay ration. Ascribing the differ- ence in digestive work entirely to the crude fiber, the authors en- deavor to estimate the expenditure of energy on this ingredient as follows: ‘ Digestive Work FoR CrupE Fisrer.—The hay ration con- tained 1572 grams less of (estimated) digestible matter and 648 grams more of total crude fiber than the mixed ration. The com- puted evolution of energy per head for the twenty-four hours was greater by 772 Cals. in the hay period. On the basis of Magnus- Levy’s results the authors assume that the expenditure of energy in the digestion of the nutrients exclusive of crude fiber equals 9 per cent. of the total energy of the digested matter. For 1572 grams (fat being reduced to its starch equivalent) this amounts to 4.1X1572X0.09=580 Cals. Accordingly, the energy metabo- lism should have been 580 Cals. less in Period ¢ than in Period f. It was actually 772 Cals. greater, a difference of 1352 Cals. This difference is ascribed to the presence of the 648 grams more of total crude fiber, and corresponds to 2.086 Cals. per gram. With an average digestibility of 55 per cent. this would equal 3.793 Cals. per gram of digested crude fiber, an amount slightly exceeding its metabolizable energy as computed on p. 331. In other words, it would appear that all the metabolizable energy of the crude fiber (or even more, should the digestibility fall below the percentage assumed) is consumed in the work of digestion and converted into heat, leaving none available for external work, and this result seems to coincide strikingly with the results obtained by Wolff * by an entirely different method. (Compare Chapter XIII, § 2.) It is to be observed, however, that the basis of Zuntz & Hage- mann’s computation is the difference between the energy required for the digestion of the 648 grams of crude fiber and that required for the digestion of an equal amount of fiber-free nutrients. To get at the total expenditure upon the digestion of the crude fiber we should make the following computation: The nutrients other than crude fiber digested were in Period f 5124 grams and in Period c 2608 grams, a difference of 2516 grams. The corresponding difference in the work of digestion would, on the * Grundlagen, etc., Neue Beitrige, 1887, p. 94. 39° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. above assumptions, be 4.1X2516X0.09=928 Cals. Adding this,- as before, to the observed difference of 772 Cals. gives a total of 1700 Cals. as the effect of the 648 grams of crude fiber, which equals 2.623 Cals. per gram. With a digestibility of 55 per cent., this corresponds to 4.768 Cals. per gram of digested crude fiber, or materially more than its metabolizable energy. UNCERTAINTIES OF THE CompuTaTION.—The whole method of computation, however, is open to serious criticism on at least two points, aside from the rather indefinite statements as to the amount of hay consumed in Period ¢ and as to the distribution of the ration between the three feedings in Period f. First, the estimate for the work of digestion of the nutrients other than crude fiber which forms the basis of the computation is derived chiefly from the experiments of Magnus-Levy on dogs and man. Those experiments were not only made with highly digesti- ble food, but the digestive work is computed as a percentage of the total (gross) energy of the food. The food of the horse contained in the dry matter 40.94 per cent. of indigestible substances in Period f and 54.37 per cent. in Period c, or if we leave out of account the crude fiber the corresponding figures are 31.99 per cent. and 58.45 per cent. A considerable part of the work of digestion un- doubtedly consists of muscular work, which must be performed on the indigestible as well as the digestible matter of the food. Moreover these indigestible matters, by their mechanical stimulus and by acting in a certain sense as diluents, may perhaps cause a more abundant secretion of the digestive juices. These facts are entirely ignored when the figures for digestive work derived from experiments on dogs and man are applied simply to the digested food of the horse. Second, the method of computation assumes that the difference between the metabolism on the two rations which was observed 2.7 hours after eating would have retained the same absolute (not rela- tive) value during the twenty-four hours. The justification for this assumption is found in a comparison * of the results of a single res- piration experiment, made one half hour after feeding, with the average of two experiments in which the excretion of carbon * Loc. cit., p. 218. INTERNAL WORK. 391 dioxide was determined for twenty-four hours in a Pettenkofer respiration apparatus. After allowing for the work of mastica- tion in the latter experiment the results were found. to agree within 8.8 per cent. The authors, therefore, conclude that with regular feeding the respiratory exchange during the forenoon hours, when their experiments were made, corresponds substan- tially to the average metabolism for the twenty-four hours, exclu- sive of the work of mastication. It is to be remarked, however, that this conclusion is not fully in harmony with the results quoted on p. 387, which plainly show a marked decrease in the metabolism during the night. Moreover, numerous other deter- minations of the respiratory exchange at the same hours and on similar food show quite wide variations. In view of this discrep- ancy, as well as of the somewhat narrow basis of comparison, it certainly appears questionable whether a computation of Periods ce and / for twenty-four hours can be safely made. Zuntz & Hagemann’s results unquestionably show that the work of digestion is greater with coarse fodder than with grain. That this difference is due, at least in large part, to the greater amount of crude fiber in the former is extremely probable. In view, however, of the two sources of uncertainty just pointed out, as well as of the numerous minor assumptions involved in the calcu- lations, we must conclude that the data available are insufficient for an accurate quantitative estimate of the digestive work re- quired by crude fiber. Work or Mastication.—The foregoing computations relate to the expenditure of energy in the digestion of the food after it has entered the stomach. The same authors have also determined the increase in the gaseous exchange caused by mastication, degluti- tion, ete. For this purpose they compare * the excretion of carbon dioxide and the consumption of oxygen during the time actually occupied in eating with the corresponding amounts during rest as found from the average of a number of experiments made under identical conditions. On the assumption that the proteid metabo- lism is unaltered, the proportion of carbohydrates and fat metabo- lized and the corresponding amounts of energy are computed by * Loc. cit., p. 271. 392 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the method described on pp. 76 and 252. The following is a sum- mary of the results computed per kilogram of feed: No. of Oxygen CO, Equivalent Fodder. Experi- Consumed, Exereted, nergy, ments. Liters. Liters. Oats and cut straw (6:1).... 8 12.964 10.679 64.17 BY cavayiekes 3 sissvsices a: cue opscede re. sed wu 8 33.840 27.813 167.44 Hay, cate, and cul .....W 8 20.072 17.677 100.79 Maize and cut straw (6: 1). 2 7.133 6.205 35.72 Green alfalfa................ 7 6.171 4.980 30.42 Computed for oats alone: i441 wiles vanes es | Seas viewers saw nis Ges 47.00 “ maize alone ...|.........|.......--. |. ee esse. 13.80 As was to have been expected, the work of mastication proves to be much greater in the case of hay than in that of grain. Maize gave a remarkably low result, while the lowest was obtained with green fodder. Even when the results on the latter are computed per kilogram of dry matter, they are still about 40 per cent. lower than those on hay. A few experiments on old horses with defect- ive teeth gave somewhat higher results for the mixture of oats and cut straw. The absolute amount of energy expended in mastication, etc., is very considerable. On the average of three periods,:on a ration consisting of 5.6 kgs. of oats, 0.93 kgs. of cut straw, and 5.18 kgs. of hay, it is computed at 1287.1 Cals., an amount equal to 11.2 per cent. of the total metabolism during rest ConcLusions.—The researches of Zuntz & Hagemann are of great value in that they demonstrate the large proportion of the energy of the food which is consumed in its prehension, mastication, digestion, and assimilation in the case of herbivorous animals, and that this proportion is largely influenced by the physical character of the food. Thus the hard but brittle maize required much less energy for its mastication than the softer but tougher and more woody oats, and the dry matter of the green alfalfa decidedly less than that of the hay. These results indicate quite clearly that no accurate estimates of the work of mastication can (at least in the present state of our knowledge) be based on the chemical compo- sition of feeding-stuffs. As noted above, Zuntz & Hagemann attempt to compute the work of digestion upon that basis. It INTERNAL WORK. 393 certainly seems open to question, however, whether in this case also other properties than those expressed by the percentage of crude fiber may not materially affect the result,* and it will be wise, until the subject receives further investigation, to accept their compu- tations as tentative and approximate.t * Compare Kellner’s results on cattle, Chapter XIII, §1. + A somewhat extended critique by Pfeiffer of these researches, together with replies by Zuntz & Hagemann, will be found in Landw. Vers. Stat., 54, 101; 55,117; 56, 283 and 289. CHAPTER XII. NET AVAILABLE ENERGY—MAINTENANCE, Tus organic matter contained in the body of an animal we have learned to regard in the light of a certain capital of stored-up energy, at the expense of which the vital activities of the organism are carried on. The function of the food is to make good the losses thus occasioned. The food is frequently spoken of as “the fuel of the body.” In a certain limited sense the comparison is admissible, but it may easily be pushed too far, and a closer analogy is that with a stream of water supplying a reservoir and serving to replenish the . drafts made upon it for water. The food in the form in which it is consumed, however, is by no means ready to enter directly into the composition of the tissues of the body and add to its store of potential energy, but on the con- trary, as we have seen, a very considerable amount of energy must be expended in the separation of the indigestible matters from the digestible and in the conversion of the latter into such forms as are suitable for the uses of the living cells of the body. When, therefore, we give food to a quiescent fasting animal we do two things: we supply it with metabolizable energy, depending in amount upon the quantity and nature of the food, to take the place of the energy expended in its internal work, but we at the same time increase its expenditure of energy by the amount neces- sary to separate the metabolizable from the non-metabolizable energy of the food. The case is analogous to that of a steam-boiler which is fired by means of a mechanical stoker driven by steam. from the same boiler. Each pound of coal fed into the fire-box is capable of evolving a certain amount of heat, representing its metabolizable energy in the above sense, and that heat is capable of producing a 394 NET AVAILABLE ENERGY—MAINTENANCE. 395 certain quantity of steam. A definite fraction of the latter, how- ever, is required to introduce the next pound of coal into the furnace and therefore is not available for driving the main engine. To recur to the illustration of the reservoir, it is as if the water, instead of simply flowing into the reservoir, actuated a pump or 4 hydraulic ram which lifted part of it to the required level. Gross AND Net AvalLaBitiry.—As stated in Chapter X, the difference between the potential energy of the food and that of the excreta represents the maximum amount of energy which is avail- able to the organism for all purposes. This quantity has some- times been designated as gross available energy, but has here been called metabolizable energy. A portion of this metabolizable energy, however, as just pointed out, has to be expended in the various processes which have been grouped together under the term work of digestion and assimilation. This portion ultimately takes the form of heat, thus tending to increase the heat production of the animal by a corresponding amount, and becomes unavailable for other purposes in the body, since, so far as we know, the organism has no power to convert heat into other forms of energy. The Temainder of the metabolizable energy of the food represents the amount which that food con- tributes directly towards the maintenance of the capital of potential energy in the body. It is the measure of the net advantage derived by the body from the introduction into it of the food.* From this point of view the energy remaining after deducting the expenditure caused by the ingestion of the food :from its metabolizable or ‘gross available energy has been called the net available energy. There are obvious objections to the use of the words available and avail- ability in two senses, but no better term for net available has yet been suggested, while the use of available energy in the sense of metabolizable energy has become quite general. It appears necessary, therefore, to retain for the present the modifying words gross and net to avoid ambiguity. DISTINCTION BETWEEN AVAILABILITY AND UtTILIzaTIon.—The net available energy of the food in the above sense represents the * As will appear later, this somewhat broad statement appears to be sub- ject to modification in certain cases in which there is an indirect utilization of the heat resulting from the work of digestion and assimilation. 396 PRINCIPLES, OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. net, contribution which it makes to the demands of the vital func- tions for. energy or, in other words, its value. as part of a mainte- nance ration. This must be clearly distinguished from its value for the storage of additional energy in the hody—that is, its value for.productive.purposes. In the latter case it is quite possible that the conversion of the digested nutrients into suitable forms for storage (fat of adipose tissue, ingredients of, milk solids, proteids of new growth, etc.) involves a greater expenditure of energy than is required ,to convert them into forms fitted to serve as sources of energy to the body cells (work of assimilation). The consideration of this question belongs in the succeeding chapter, but meanwhile it is important to bear in mind that the net available energy, in the sense in which the term is here employed, is a distinct con- ception from that of the utilization of energy in fattening, milk production, etc., and has reference a the availability of the energy of the food for maintenance. It is evident from the above paragraphs that the value of a feeding-stuff to the animal is not measured solely by its metaboliz- able energy, since materials containing the same proportion of the latter may require the expenditure of. very unequal amounts of energy for their digestion and assimilation and, therefore, may contain very unequal amounts of net available energy. Plainly, then, it is a matter of much importance to know the net avail- ability of the metabolizable energy of the various nutrients and » feodi ior. ,, “al to learn the proportions in which they may reprace each o . ~ 1106.8 67.51 : i 1131.7 672.5 59.41 Flesh-meal: | VI... 454.9 315.7 69.39 A computation based on the observed amounts of methane would affect the above figures in two ways. First, if the added proteids diminished the production of methane, this was equivalent to an increase in the apparent metabolizable energy of the food, and the figures for the latter must be correspondingly increased. Second, the gain of fat will also appear relatively greater in the intermediate periods, II-VI, and the figures for the energy of the gain must also be increased. Computed on this basis the results are: . Energy of Energy of, Per Cent. Period. aes oom Beoulgne Gain, Utilized. 10 ee re 715.4 605.7 84.68 Conglutin: MT cs tengieushenss nee 1245.8 842.4 67.63 TV irae din dare 1902.3 1288.8 67.76 Flesh: al: A Pee ree 1288 .2 780.7 60.59 EAE Vilaseiganiesiad s 582.1 403.6 69.33 No obvious explanation of the exceptionally high results ob- tained in Period Il presents itself. Those of the remaining periods do not seem to indicate any considerable differences in the utilization of different quantities. The figures are notably higher than those computed from the Méckern experiments, but in view of the uncertainties attaching to them too much stress should not be laid on this fact. Discussion of Results. As was pointed out at the beginning of this section, and as was further apparent in considering the results of experiments upon carnivora, our knowledge of the net availability of the energy of feeding-stuffs and nutrients is too imperfect to permit the experi- 466 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. mental results above detailed to be discussed from the standpoint of the percentage utilization of the net available energy. Furthermore, even confining ourselves to a consideration of the utilization of the metabolizable energy of the food, we have already seen that the recorded results upon carnivorous animals show such , wide divergencies as to render it difficult if not impossible to draw any quantitative conclusions from them. For the present, accordingly, our discussion of the utilization of energy must be confined chiefly to the results which have been reached with herbivora, and in the main to the Méckern experi- ments, and we must content ourselves with an attempt to trace the relations between metabolizable energy and energy utilized, or, to look at the subject from the other point of view, with determining the proportion of the metabolizable energy of the food which is expended in’ the combined work of digestion, assimilation, and tissue building. From the practical standpoint this is of course the important thing, since either form of expenditure of energy constitutes, in the economic aspect of the matter, a waste, but it is nevertheless to be regretted that it is at present impossible to further analyze this waste. ; Influence of Amount of Food.—As in the discussion of net availability in Chapter XII, we have thus far assumed the energy utilized to be a linear function of the net available or of the metabo- lizable energy of the food. Before proceeding further it becomes important to consider how far this assumption is justified by the facts on record. Carnivora.—Of the experiments upon carnivora recorded on preceding pages, those of Rubner with different amounts of meat, when computed by his method (that is, assuming an availability of 100 per cent. below the maintenance point, as on p. 450), appear to indicate that the utilization above that point is constant. If, how- ever, a lower percentage of availability is assumed, as on p. 451, this constancy disappears. None of the other results there sum- marized seem suitable for discussion from this point of view. Swine.—If in the experiments of Meissl, Strohmer & Lorenz, as computed on p. 454, we express the estimated metabolizable energy of the excess food as a percentage of the fasting metabolism, we have the following comparison of the percentage utilization with THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 467 the relative amount of excess food, to which may be added Kor- nauth & Arche’s results similarly computed: Excess Over : Fasting Percentage Metabolism, Utilization. Per Cent. Meissl : Experiment I......... 133 80.7 ee AV 7 siete, bosseeans 250 75.2 J ALL 2 eecas ones 74 70.9 es AV cera wea 180 67.1 Kornauth & Arche: ; Experiment III......... 126 71.7 ie b Dh Senora 129 65.3 While there is some variation in the percentage utilization, as would naturally be expected in experiments with different animals, the range in the relative amount of excess food is much greater and there is no indication of a connection between the two. Ruminants.—The earlier Méckern experiments by G. Kihn include one upon wheat gluten and two upon starch in which two different quantities were added to the basal ration of the same animal. The final results were as follows: Percentage Added Tate att Animal. Period. Basal Raion, yee able Energy. Til 3 0.68 45.3 Wheat gluten.... { hi 4 1.36 48.0 Vv 2a 2.0 53.2 Vv 2b 2.0 53.7 Starch........... Vv 3 3.5 59.7 VI 2b 2.0 48.1 VI 3 3.5 46.6 These results do not indicate that any material effect is exerted upon the utilization of the metabolizable energy of the food by the amount consumed, since the differences are small in themselves and in both directions. The results, reported by Pfeiffer, of experiments upon the addi- tion of varying amounts of proteids to a basal ration, as computed by the writer (p. 465), likewise show a fairly constant percentage 468 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. utilization of the energy of the proteids used, with the exception of the strikingly higher result of the first period. A similar conclusion may be drawn from a study of the Méckern results as a whole, as recorded in Table VII of the Appendix. While the computed percentages in each series vary more or less in the different experiments, the differences are in most cases not large and appear to bear no relation either to the total quantity of food given or to the amount of the particular food under experi- ment which was added to the basal ration, but to be due rather to individual differences in the animals. This is strikingly shown in the following table, in which the results upon hay, wheat gluten, and starch are arranged in the order of the percentage utilization: Metaboliz- | Total Excess| Percentage able Ener, Over Com- | Utilization / Feeding-stuff. Animal.| Period.| of Adde puted Main-| of Metabo- Food, tenance, lizable Cals. Cals. Energy. J 2 7875 12,192 34.8 G 2 5726 9,780 36.2 Meadow hay .......... F 1 5506 10,184 40.4 H 7 8505 11,905 48.4 H 2 7875 11,275 50.4 B 1 4483 15,129" 36.9 D 4 5713 17,373 37.3 C 3 6033 19,635 43.2 Wheat gluten ......... 4| Til 3 2913 8,982 45.3 ‘ Ill 4 5332 11,401 48.0 B 3 5507 16,153 49.7 Iv 3 3645 7,132 58.2 (} VI 3 8264 12,364 46.6 4 4 5038 9,138 48.1 ' 4350 3,411 49.2 Starch—Kthn's expts. . ur! 2 4998 6.592 50.0 Vv 2a 5425 8,821 53.2 l\| Vv 3 9658 13,054 59.7 (| D 2 4420 16,080 53.7 J 3 4826 9,142 54.8 H 3 6668 10,068 56.0 Starch—Kellner’s expts Cc 2 3027 16,829 57.6 F 4 5009 9,686 64.8 B 2 3291 13,937 65.4 G 4 5387 9,441 65.8 But while this is true of each series by itself, a comparison of the two series upon starch leads to a different conclusion. In Kithn’s experiments the basal rations consisted largely or exclu- sively of coarse fodder. In Kellner’s experiments the starch was THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 469 added to a materially heavier basal ration containing considerable grain and therefore already tolerably rich in starch and other carbo- hydrates. In spite of the smaller average amounts of starch added, then, Kellner’s results in a sense represent the percentage utiliza- tion of larger quantities of starch than do Kiihn’s; that is, they represent the utilization of starch at a greater distance above the maintenance ration. The average utilization (pp. 461-2) was— Ktihn’s experiments ................005. 50.0 per cent. Kellner’s experiments, moderate rations... 58.4 “ “ as heavy rations...... Glo os It would appear, then, from “these figures that the metaboliz- able energy of starch was more fully utilized in rations containing a relatively large quantity of it. At least a partial explanation of this seems to be afforded by the variations in the production of hydrocarbons (methane). As was mentioned in discussing the metabolizable energy of starch, the conditions in Kthn’s experi- ments were such as to permit a considerable proportion of the starch to undergo the methane fermentation, while the more abun- dant supply of it in Kellner’s experiments resulted in reducing, or in some cases wholly suppressing. this fermentation of the starch. The effect of this, as there pointed out, was to make the metaboliz- able energy per gram greater in Kellner’s than in Kiihn’s experi- ments, but it has also another result. As we have seen, the methane fermentation constitutes part of the work of digestion, in the general sense in which that term is here employed, the amount of the latter being measured by the heat evolved. This amount being less in Kellner’s than in Kiihn’s experiments, the net availability of the metabolizable energy of the starch should be greater, and, other things being equal, the storage of energy (gain of tissue) should also be greater. Kellner * computes that for each 100 grams of starch digested there was produced, on the average, methane corresponding to the following amounts of carbon:- In Kithn’s experiments...............6.. 3.0 grams In Kellner’s experiments. .............. 2.3 * Loc. cit., p. 423. 470 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. An approximate computation of the probable differences in the heat evolved by the fermentation, based on such data as are avail- able, gives as a result 0.159 Cal. per gram of starch, or somewhat more than one-half the difference in average utilized energy, viz., 0.265 Cal. per gram. The data on which the computation is based, however, are too uncertain to allow us to attach very much value to the results, except perhaps as an indication that the supposed cause of the difference in the utilization of the energy is insuffi- cient to fully account, for the effect. ConcLusions.—It cannot be claimed that the above results are sufficiently extensive or exact to permit final conclusions to be drawn, but their general tendency seems to be in favor of the hy- pothesis that the proportion of energy utilized is substantially inde- pendent of the quantity of food, provided that the changes in the latter are not so great as to modify the course of the fermentations in the digestive tract. The results upon starch just considered seem to indicate that if the variations in quantity or make-up of the ration are pushed beyond that point, a difference in the pro- portion of the energy utilized may be caused by a difference in the digestive work; in other words, that it is the availability that is modified rather than the proportion of the available energy which is recovered as gain. While not denying that the latter function may be also modified, either directly as the effect. of varying amounts of food, or indirectly by changes in the chemical nature of the sub- stances resorbed from the digestive tract under varying conditions of fermentation, it seems probable that the main effect is that upon availability. It is to be observed that the rations used in these experiments, while not heavy fattening rations, still produced very fair gains. The experimental periods were comparatively short and hence the testimony of the live weight itself is liable to be misleading. Taking the actual gains of fat and proteids as shown by the respi- ration experiments, however, and comparing them with the compo- sition of the increase of live weight in fattening as determined by Lawes & Gilbert, it appears that the total gain per day was equiva- lent to from 0.9 to 2.5 pounds gain in live weight per day in the ex- periments on coarse fodder, while in those upon concentrated feeds the corresponding range is from 1 to 3 pounds. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 471 It. may be remarked further that the rations in Kiithn’s experi- ments differed materially from those ordinarily used in practice, both as to their make-up and their very wide nutritive ratio, so that the conditions may fairly be regarded as in a sense abnormal. Kellner’s rations represent more nearly normal conditions, and they fail, as we have seen, to give any clear indications of an in- fluence of amount of food upon the proportion of energy utilized. Whether other feeding materials show a behavior analogous to that of starch, future investigations must decide. In the meantime we are apparently justified in discussing such results as are now on record upon the provisional hypothesis that, within reasonable limits, the utilization of energy is independent of the amount of food, or, in other words, is a linear function. Influence of Thermal Environment.— The influence of the thermal environment of the animal upon its heat production and upon the net availability of the energy of the food has already been fully discussed in previous pages and needs only a brief consider- ation here. RuMINANtTs.—We have already found reason to think that in ruminants the heat production on the ordinary maintenance ration is in excess of the needs of the body. Kiihn’s and Kellner’s results show us that from 25 to 72 per cent. of the metabolizable energy of the food supplied in excess of the maintenance requirement was converted into heat, so that the heat production was frequently increased 40 or 50 per cent. above that which was observed on the maintenance ration. Under these circumstances we can hardly suppose that any moderate changes in the thermal environment would sensibly affect either the availability of the food energy or its percentage utilization. The writer is not aware of any exact determinations of the influence of the thermal environment upon the heat production of fattening ruminants, but the above conclusion is in harmony ‘with the practical experience of many feeders that moderate exposure to cold is-no disadvantage, but rather an advantage in maintaining the health and appetite of the animals, and it appears also to have the support of not a few practical feeding trials.* \ ee * Compare Henry, ‘Feeds and Feeding,” second edition, p. 364, and Waters, Bulletin Mo, Bd. Agr., September, 1901, p. 23. 472 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Naturally this can be true only within limits, and exposure to very low temperatures, especially in a damp climate, and particu- larly to cold rains, causing a large expenditure of heat in the evapo- ration of water from the surface of the body, may very well pass the limit and cause an increase in the metabolism simply to main- tain the temperature of the body. Finally, the time element, as pointed out on p. 439, is one to be taken into consideration. Swine.—As was remarked on p. 435, the work of digestion is doubtless less with the swine than in ruminants, on account of the more concentrated nature of his food, and as was shown on p. 438, the maintenance requirement appears to be affected by the thermal environment. The same reason would tend to make fattening swine more susceptible to this influence than fattening -ruminants. This conclusion is borne out by the experiments of Shelton * at the Kansas Agricultural College, who found that swine kept in an open yard during rather severe weather required 25 per cent. more corn to make a given gain than those sheltered from extreme cold. Influence of Character of Food.—Attention was called in the previous chapter to the fact that the expenditure of energy in the digestion and assimilation of the food is largely dependent upon the nature of that food, but as was there pointed out, we have few quantitative determinations of the differences. Experiments of the class now under consideration show marked variations in the proportion of the metabolizable energy of different foods which is utilized, and we should naturally be inclined to ascribe these variations to differences in the work of digestion and assimilation rather than to differences in the physiological processes involved in tissue production. The data recorded in the foregoing pages constitute only a beginning of the study of the utilization of the energy of feeding- stuffs, but a brief consideration of the main results will prove at least suggestive. CONCENTRATED FEEDING-STUFFS.—As we saw in connection with the discussion of the metabolizable energy of feeding-stuffs in Chapter X, the Méckern experiments, to which we owe the larger share of our present knowledge regarding the metabolism of energy in farm animals, were made for the purpose of comparing the * Rep. Prof. of Agriculture, 1883. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 473 principal classes of nutrients rather than commercial feeding-stuffs. Accordingly such representative materials as starch, oil, and glu- ten were largely used, and we have as yet but few determinations either of the metabolizable energy of ordinary concentrated feeding- stuffs or of its percentage utilization. We have already considered to some extent the advantages and disadvantages resulting from making the pure nutrients, on the one hand, or actual feeding-stuffs, on the other, the starting-point for investigations. Passing over this question for the present, we may conveniently group together here such results as are on record for materials other than coarse fodders. Starch.—Starch, as a representative of the readily digested car- bohydrates, has, as we have seen, received a large share of atten- tion. The results obtained are tabulated in the Appendix, and have already been partially considered in their bearings upon the influence of amount of food. It was there noted that the earlier series of experiments by Kithn, in which the starch was added to a ration of coarse fodder only, gave results differing decidedly from those obtained later by Kellner from the addition of starch to a mixed fattening ration. Among the latter experiments, more- over, were two (animals B and C) which were exceptional in that very large total amounts of starch were contained in the ration, relatively large amounts escaping digestion, while none of the added starch underwent the methane fermentation. A clear image of the fate of the total potential energy supplied to the organism in the starch is best obtained by a study of its per- centage distribution among the several excreta, the work of digestion, assimilation, and tissue building, and the gain secured, as in the table on page 474, in which each of the three sets of experiments indicated above is given separately. The figures for the work of digestion, etc., are, of course, obtained by difference. As pointed out in the discussion of metabolizable energy, the percentage of the gross energy carried off in the feces includes, as here computed, not only the energy of the undigested portion of the starch itself, but also that of the portion of the basal ration which escaped digestion under the influence of the starch. This is espe- cially true of Kellner’s experiments with moderate rations, in which little or no starch could be detected in the feces. Similarly, the ‘ 474 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF STARCH, Work of Diges- dé | gee, a | 6 UdIn = ¢ Fens Une. 3s Hien, Gain. a 3 3 an q-| 2 s Tissue ‘A 5 a Build- < Py fi ing. (| IIL} 2 | 20.02] —1.29} 10.06) 35.61| 35.60 IV | 2 |25.29| —1.01} 12.01] 32.41) 31.30 ee . Vi} 2a| 8.82 1.03] 11.20] 36.95} 42.00 Hphnls exparioaentgs ss x v | 2b |15.73| —0.27| 9.86| 34.58] 40.10 VI | 20 | 22.49] —2.61| 8.86] 36.96} 34.30 VI| 3 |19.03] —0.88| 11.87) 37.38) 32.60 (| D| 2 |29.99} —3.27] 6.08] 31.10; 36.10 Kellner’s experiments: | F| 4 |16.42]} 0.73] 11.41) 25.24] 46.20 Moderate rations....... G| 4 |18.35] 0.35} 8.98| 26.42) 50.90 : { H| 3 |15.72| —2.32| 7.38] 34.82| 44.40 J|3 | 14.85 1.14, 11.85] 32.66] 39.50 Kellner’s experiments: ; Sos aah . B| 2 | 59.60] —3.25}—4.96 i , gay MSUONG aa ss ass | C | 2 | 52.22] —0.89|—0.01] 26.68} 28.00 _ Averages: : Kihn’s experiments ..... ....{...-| 19.59] —0.92| 10.74] 35.19] 35.40 Kellner’s experiments: Moderate rations....... ..ee|...-| 17.61] —0.66] 9.21) 30.64) 43.20 Heavy rations......... wee-{.--.| 55.91] —2.07|—2.49] 18.75] 29.90 negative losses in the urine and, in two cases, in the methane mean, of course, that under the influence of starch the metabolic or other processes were so modified that less of the potential energy of the basal ration was lost through these channels. The starch, so to speak, borrowed energy from the basal ration. In brief, the figures of the table give us a picture of the aggregate net results of supplying 100 units of additional potential energy in the form of starch, or in other words, of the “apparent” utilization. As between Kijhn’s results and those of Kellner upon moderate rations, the chief difference, as already noted, is the less evolution of methane in the latter and, apparently as, in part, a consequence of this, the smaller expenditure of energy in the work of digestion, ete. Combined with the slightly smaller loss in the feces, this results in making the energy utilized a much larger percentage of the gross energy. Apparently Kellner’s figures correspond most nearly to normal conditions of feeding and may be taken to repre- sent the average utilization of starch under these circumstances. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 475 In Kellner’s two experiments on heavy rations the enormous losses in the feces cut down the percentage utilization to a very low figure and thus render difficult a direct comparison with the other averages. While the above form of stating the results appears the simplest and most direct, it is of interest also to eliminate the influence of varying digestibility by computing the percentage distribution of the gross energy of the apparently digested portion of the starch. This is particularly the case since Kellner’s computations of his experiments are made in a somewhat similar way. Combining the data given on p. 461, regarding the percentages of metaboliz- able energy utilized, with those on p. 301 for the energy of the apparently digested matter, we have the following: DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY: OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED STARCH. Work of Digestion, In Urine. | In Methane. |Assimilation,| In Gain. Per Cent. Per Cent. and Tissue | Per Cent. Building. Per Cent. Kihn’s experiments ........ —1.19 13:42 43.89 43.88 Kellner’s experiments: ; Moderate rations......... _ 0.92 11.12 37 .36 52.44 Heavy rations .......... «| i 4.95 —6.15 42.77 68.33 Kellner’s computations are made in a different manner.* Omit- ting in the computation of metabolizable energy the correction for nitrogen gained or lost, he compares the period in which starch was fed with that on the basal ration substantially as has been: done above. He then, however, introduces a correction for the influence of the starch upon the digestibility of the basal ration. For ex- ample, comparing Periods 3 and 4 on Ox H, he finds in the manner shown on p. 307, Chapter X, that the equivalent of 820 Cals. less of the basal ration was digested in the period in which starch was added to it, while there is a further correction of 112 Cals. to be made for the less amount of organic matter of the basal ration con- sumed in Period 3, making a total difference of 932 Cals. Of the gross energy of the basal ration, 79.9 per cent. was found to be met- * Compare Landw. Vers. Stat., 53, 450. 476 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. abolizable, so that the above difference in gross energy would corre- spond to 745 Cals. of metabolizable energy. Of the metabolizable energy of the basal ration in excess of maintenance, 59.6 per cent. was recovered in the gain. If, then, the differences in organic matter consumed and in the digestibility of the basal ration had not offset some of the effect of the starch in Period 3, there would have been 745 Cals. more of metabolizable energy disposable from the basal ration, and presumably the gain resulting from this would have been 59.6 per cent. of 745 Cals., or 444 Cals. We have, then, by this method the following: Metabolizabl Enerey ‘Above,| Sugeerot “Cals. Cals, Period 3 minus Period 4........... 0000000000: 6667 3752 Correction for live weight................0204. 67 40 6600 3712 Correction for organic matter and for decreased digestibility 2.3 s00 cca vex ves woe vs cdaa vee ew i 745 444 7345 4156 Percentage utilization ............... 20.0000 [eee ee eee eee 56.6% Kellner’s results, then, assuming that the corrections are accu- rate, represent respectively the metabolizable and the utilizable energy of the digested matter of the starch itself, while the results as computed on the preceding pages represent, as was there pointed out, a balance between the various negative and positive effects of the addition of starch. In other words, Kellner attempts to com- pute the real as distinguished from the apparent utilization of the energy of the starch. The comparison on the opposite page of the percentages obtained in this way with those computed on p. 461 will therefore be of interest. Kellner also computes by his method the distribution of the “ gross energy of the digested starch in Kithn’s experiments and in his own experiments on moderate rations. As calculated in Chapter X, pp. 325-6, the average loss of potential energy in methane was 12.7 per cent. in Kithn’s experiments, and 10.11 per cent. in Kellner’s, while none of the potential energy of the digested starch passed THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 477 UTILIZATION OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF STARCH. Real Utiliza- Apparent tion as Utilization as Animal.| Period,| Computed by | Computed on ellner. p. a “er Cent. , Per Cent. III 2 46.2 50.0 IV 2 49.0 49.2 Kihn’s experiments .......... 4 y od ee oe ‘ VI | 2 48.0 48.1 L| wr: des 46.8 46.6 Kellner’s experiments: D 2 54.2 53.7 F 4 63.2 64.8 Moderate rations..........- 4 G 4 65.2 65.8 H 3 56.2 56.0 [ J 3 55.2 54.8 Heavy rations ............. { a : ss a 2 - Averages, Kiihn’s experiments ..........J......].....- 49.0 ‘50.0 Kellner’s experiments: Moderate rations...........)....../...0-- 58.9 58.4 Heavy rations .............J....0.[/...04. 58.9 61.5 into the urine. In the two cases, then, 87.30 per cent. and 89.89 per cent. respectively of the potential energy of the digested starch was metabolizable. Of this metabolizable energy 49.0 per cent. and 58.9 per cent. respectively was recovered in the gain. Com- bining these figures we have— DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED STARCH. oe of In Urine, {In Methane, elation In Gain Per Cent. | Per Cent. Beast ason ‘| Per Cent. ' Building Per Cent. Kiihn’s experiments........... 0 12.70 44.52 42.78 Kellner’s experiments; Moderate rations..........- 0 10.11 36.95 52.94 The final results for the energy recovered in the gain of tissue, whether expressed as a percentage of metabolizable energy or of energy of digested matter, are substantially the same numer- ically as those reached by the former method of computation, but this agreement is purely accidental, and the significance of the 478 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. figures is essentially different, as already explained. From the re- sults last given, assuming the gain of energy to have been entirely in the form of fat, Kellner * computes that the conversion of starch into fat in cattle takes place according to the following scheme: Starches cytualsaseeGaes 100.00 grams +Oxygen.............. 388.69 “ Yield: Methane........... ...... 3.17 grams VWialen Aachen teapa aus * 93.49 * Carbon dioxide..... ...... 88.78 “ Pativcsewatasecaeew haces 23.34 “ 138.69 grams 138.69 “ Oil.—Applying to Kellner’s three experiments upon the addition of oil to a basal ration the same method of computation which was used for the starch—that is, computing the apparent utilization— we have the results shown in the two following tables: . DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF OIL. * Work of a j | In Feces. | In Urine. rae ; | In Gain. : Hi. | Per Cent. | Per Cont. | Por Gent, | 98.224 | Per Cent. 1g Building. Per Cent. Sample I.......... D| 3] 24.34 | —1.08 |— 1.02] 37.66] 40.10 “ OT Fi 5 | 64.77 | —1.19 |—16.10 18.32 34.20 iene: G| 5] 41.00 1.37 |— 1.76 18.19 41.20 Average of Sample lI|...}...) 52.89 0.09 |— 8.93 | 18.25 | 37.70 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED OIL. Work of we areBton (EEE Animal.| Period. ee ie oe. soe and Pers Building Per Cent. Sample J............. D 3 —1.42 |— 1.34 | 49.76 | 53.00 a | ree sj] F 5 | —3.38 |—45.69 | 52.01 | 97.06 Bete Gy | G 5 2.32 |— 3.01 | 30.83 | 69.86 Average for Sample IJ]......]...... —0.53 |—24.35 | 41.42 | 83.46 * Loc. cit., 58, 452. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 479 As was noted in the discussion of metabolizable energy in Chapter X, the results on Ox F appear to be exceptional, but those. upon the other two show considerable differences, and it is evident that further investigation will be necessary to obtain satisfactory data upon the effect of oil fed in this way. Kellner’s method of computation, based upon the provisional conclusion on p. 323, Chapter X, that oil has substantially no effect upon the loss of energy in urine and methane under normal condi-: tions, gives the following results: PERCENTAGE OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY UTILIZED, As Computed As Computed by Kellner. on p. 462. OX Dieeiecss §2.2 51.6 fe OH. fag aueac ke [tage heave ede: Sem Nh 65.1 FS Giase re eee te 59.4 69.4 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED OIL. Work of Digestion, , Ani- Period In Urine,| In Methane, | Assimilation | In Gain, mal. * }PerCent.| Per Cent. and Tissue | Per Cent. Building, Per Cent. Sample I........ D| 3 0 0 47.8 52.2 : Vises eee ay G 5 0 0 40.6 59.4 Average....... sucisGe a. [ee Seas 0 0 44.2 55.8 Average computed as on p. 478....|..0..-]. e200 ee 0.5 —2.2 40.3 61.4 The numerical results of these experiments show more clearly than was the case with the starch the difference in the two methods of computation. Both methods agree, however, in showing that the combined expenditure of energy in the digestion and assimilation of the oil and in tissue building is very considerable. We have already seen that the expenditure of energy in the digestion of fat by car- nivora and by man is comparatively small. If we are justified in assuming that the same thing is true of ruminants, the result just reached signifies that the digested fat undergoes extensive trans- formations before being finally deposited in the adipose tissue. 480 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Until, however, we have satisfactory determinations of the per- centage utilization of fat by carnivora, or of its net availability in ruminants, or both, no final conclusion on this point is possible. Wheat Gluten.—The three samples of this feeding-stuff experi- mented upon contained respectively 87.88, 83.45, and 82.67 per cent. of crude protein in the dry matter, the remainder being chiefly starch, with the exception of 2.22 per cent. of ether extract in the first lot. A reference to the results obtained for the metabolizable energy will show that they were variable and also that, especially in the earlier experiments, the incidental effects were large. Tabulating the results as in case of starch and oil we have the results contained in the tables on this and the opposite pages. DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF WHEAT GLUTEN, Work of Diges- in |, In|, tion, In Feces. | [yjne, |Methane.| Assimila-| In Gain. i { ¢ Per Cent. |per Cent,.|Per Cent.| tion. and|Per Cent. cae: phe, z Per Cent. ‘(| TIT | 3 |-10.38 | 17.85] 10.81 | 44.72 | 37.00 III} 4 |— 1.28 | 21.71}° 5.08 | 38.69 | 35.80 Kuhn's experiments. . | Av.,...|— 5.83 | 19.78 | 7.95 | 41.70 | 36.40 IV | 3 |—16.17 | 16.18 |—1.26 | 42.35 | 58.90 Kellner’s experiments: B/ 1] 30,16 | 16.58 |- 0.08 | 33.58 | 19.60 B/3| 22.55 | 13.52 |—1.62 | 32.95 | 32.60 Sample I.......... C|/ 3] 20.89 | 11.19 |—3.69 | 40.71 | 30.90 Av.|...| 24.53 | 18.76 |—1.74 | 35.75 | 27.70. Sample II.......... D| 4] 15.80] 12.39] 1.91 | 43.80 | 26.10 Average of Land II.|....|...] 20.16 | 13.08 | 0.08 | 39.78 | 26.90 The exceptionally small loss of energy in the urine in the case of Ox IV, Period 3, and the total suppression of the methane fer- mentation, as well as the fact that the metabolizable energy was apparently greater than the gross energy, seem to justify exclud- ing this experiment from the average, although there was appar- ently nothing abnormal in the ration fed. In the experiment with Ox D, Period 4, the nutritive ratio’ was very narrow (1;3.3), and Kellner considers this a probable explanation of the THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 481 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. Work of I eee | oc | In Urine. n dion, an ad In Gain. ‘ A | @ | Pen Cent. Portene Tissue Per Cent. a ou Building. Per Cent. (| III) 3 | 16.17 9.79 | 40.50] 33.54 | Ill} 4] 21.44 5.02 | 38.24 | 35.30 Kithn’s experiments ...... | [ Av.|...| 18.81 7.39 | 39.38 | 34.42 IV; 3] 13.92 | —1.07 | 36.44] 50.71 Kellner’s experiments: (| By) 1 | 23.74 0.11 | 48.06} 28.09 |} B| 3] 17.46 |} —2.10 | 42.57] 42.07 Sample I ............. {| Cl} 3] 14.15 | —4.67 | 51.46 | 39.06 | L| Av |...] 18.45 | —2.22 | 47.35 | 36.42 Sample IT............... D/|4/ 14.72: 2.27] 52.01 | 31.00 Average of IandII.....]....)...] 16.59 0.02 | 49.68 33.71 relatively small utilization of the protein as computed by his method. (See below.) An unexpected result is that while the earlier sample of gluten seems to have increased the methane fermentation, the later samples, although containing more starch, caused a decrease in the methane production except in case of Ox D. Digestible Protein.—Kellner does not attempt to compute the energy utilized from the wheat gluten as a whole by his method, but uses the results as a basis for computing the utilization of the energy of the digested protein. He finds that of the metabolizable energy of the latter. computed in the manner described in Chapter X (p. 316), the following percentages were recovered in the gain: Oe Badan eke earescawen ede 45.0 per cent. OX Che se Qo 10k hendiini PSS EE ASK ee ns OKI puke cetekca nila ana keh ees 45.1% @ OSL sa ieee ara ook A 48.8 “ « AVePage.....60225e5e4esbaeaeeu 45.2 “ © OR Dy stead odontal Date Pac oie ees 32.9 0 The average loss of energy in the urine was found (p. 317) to be 19.3 per cent. of the gross energy of the digested protein. Applying 482 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. this average to the above figures, and assuming with Kellner that the protein does not take part in the methane fermentation, we have the following: DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED PROTEIN, Work of i In Meth: Press ie In Gai Animal: 7 Ber Gent, "Per Cent.” and Tissue | Per Cent. Building. Per Cent Bess nan scsicieas 44.38 36.32 Cra eee s vies 46.24 34.46 TLD iedtns sete x 44.30 36.40 TV a oce as eaten yd 19.30 an!) 41.32 39.28 Average .... 44.07 36.63 Dscecniasvice ro mroiese 54.15 26.55 There is a wide discrepancy between these results and those computed on p. 465 from the experiments of Kern & Wattenberg upon sheep with conglutin and flesh-meal. Omitting the apparently exceptional result of Period II, we have the following as the per- centages of the (computed) metabolizable energy of the digested proteids which was utilized in those experiments: ; Period. Per Cent Conglutin.......... { a a é ssh AVCT ABC 6 ass excl eae aa ctor 67.70 Flesh-meal......... { - . . ay F peas AVCTAC oie cd ase ned ol ore eccoes 64.96 While the gain in these cases includes a considerable growth of wool, it seems difficult to suppose that this alone can have made the conditions so much more favorable for the storing up of: the added protein as to account for the great difference between these results and Kellner’s, and it must apparently be left to further investigation to clear up the matter. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 483 It need hardly be added that none of these results are directly comparable with those computed above, after another method, for the wheat gluten as a whole. Beet Molasses ——The results of the three experiments upon beet molasses show such great differences, as was noted in Chapter X and as is further apparent from the following table, that any dis- cussion of them would evidently be premature: DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF BEET MOLASSES. Work of In Digestion, In Feces. | In Urine. | Methane. | Assimilation,| In Gain. Per Cent. | Per Cent. | Per Cent.| and Tissue | Per Cent. a ¢ Building. Per Cent. Animal. Period Sample I......... F|6| 26.87] 3.92 | —1.95| 29/56 | 41.60 . te 6| 5.40] 3.16 | 12.44] 13.10 | 65.90 peeves J|6| 14.45] 2.67 | 10.18] 36.20 | 36.50 Average........]...]...[ 9.92] 2.92 | 11.81] 24.65 | 51.20 Rice.—The two experiments upon swine by Meissl, Strohmer & Lorenz, when computed as on p. 454, show that of the (estimated) metabolizable energy of the food approximately the following per- centages were recovered in the gain: Pend Teed geceus ve Giese wa wees 80.7 per cent. RS Tile ahaa sieia di ae aise lor earn eliialae 7o.2. fe ANGTARO ise osc cn cenit ae awe 78.0 “ « These results are notably higher than any obtained in experi- ments on ruminants. Like the results on barley and cockle below they are the expression in another form of the well-known supe- riority of the swine as an economical producer of meat. Barley.—For the utilization of the energy of this grain the single experiment by Meissl, Strohmer & Lorenz gives 70.9 per cent. of the (estimated) metabolizable energy. Mized Grains.—For mixed grains Kornauth & Arche’s results on swine give figures which do not differ materially from-the result just computed for barley, viz.: Experiment I........-.-.020e esses 71.7 per cent. a Tl A eeheueteer sas 65.8 “ 484 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Coarse FoppErs.—Kellner’s results upon hay, straw, and ex- tracted straw are the only data regarding the utilization of the energy of this class of feeding-stuffs which we as yet possess. Only those experiments in which coarse fodder was added to a mixed basal ration are available for a computation of this sort. Meadow Hay.—The two kinds of meadow hay (V and VI) used in Kellner’s experiments gave the following results for the distri- bution of their energy, computed as in previous instances: DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF MEADOW HAY, Work of : Z Digestion, eM ie n imila- : A = Hones, Urine. Methane.| tion, and Ln tomers ‘a | ‘E |Per Cent.|Per Cent.|Per Cent.) Tissue , 4\¢ Building. Per Cent. Fj 1 | 49.81 | 4.32 | 5.12 |} 24.25 | 16.50 Sample V..........6 G|2| 44.80 | 4.26] 6.94] 28.10 | 15.90 Av. 47.30 | 4.29 | 6.03 | 26.18 | 16.20 H|2/| 37.07] 5.24] 4.87] 26.32 | 26.50 H! 7 | 34.78 | 5.00] 6.15 | 27.97 | 26.10 Sample VI........... {| J] 2| 34.30] 6.33 | 6.13 | 34.74 | 18.50 | L|Av.}...] 35.388 | 5.52 | 5.72 | 29.68 | 23.70 Byerage-ct V andl Wisi: ...| 41.384 | 4.91 | 5.87] 27.93 | 19.95 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. Work of = : 4 SSL B- ‘ 8 | S| Percent, | Methane. | tion, and | po. eine ‘a| 5 Per Cent. Baines a Bs Per Cent. 7 (| F} 1 8.61 10.20 48 .39 32.80 Sample V............ } G|2] 7.72 | 12.58 | 50.85 | 28.85 Av. 8.17 11.39 49.62 30.82 HY} 2 8.32 7.74 41.63 42.31 r H|7 7.66 9.43 42.77 40.14 Sample VI........... J/2| 9.64 9.33 | 52.83 | 28.20 Av.|... 8.54 8.83 45.75 36.88 Average of V and VI..|... 8.34 10.78 49.08 31.80 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 485 Computed by Kellner’s method, the percentage of the metabo- lizable energy of the hay which was recovered as gain of tissue was as follows, as compared with the results obtained by the writer’s method: PERCENTAGE OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY RECOVERED. Computed b Computed b: i : Writer's ellner’s the ee 8 Method. Method. ORs acs katana 42.8 40.4 Hay Vins seer ates ios sears, anatein etch 37.7 36.2 Average ......... 40.2 8.3 Ox H, Period 2). Se. 4 eH en \ 49.9 | 48.4 Hay VI........ biases ats Ee AD iiids eae nate nae 35.8 34.8 L| Average. ......... 42.8 44.5 Average of V and VI....|........----- ee eee 41.5 41.4 Computing the results upon the gross energy of the digested matter of the hay, Kellner obtains the following: DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED MATTER, Work of — Digestion, In Urine. In Methane. | Assimilation, In Gain. Per Cent. Per Cent. and Tissue Per Cent. Building. Per Cent. Hay: Visecssascpeads 8.2 11.5 48.00 32.3 yy dy Sapa gana ees 8.8 9.0 48.10 34.1 Average........- 8.5 10.3 48 .00 33.2 As in some previous cases, the numerical results of the two methods of computation do not vary greatly, but their essentially different significance should not be forgotten. Oat Straw.—For the single sample of this feeding-stuff experi- mented on, the results, arranged in the same order as before, were as follows: ‘ PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. 486 DISTIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF OAT STRAW. Work of eestor: : . In Feces. | [n Urine. In ‘simula’ | Yn Gain. Animsl. | Period.| Per Cent. | Per Cent, | Methane. tien. and | Per Cent. Building. Per Cent. Biden tcaseen 2 56.77 2.29 4.40 22.34 14.20 Gd bisecnreesasns 1 56.86 1.86 6.23 23.35 11.70 Average.....|...... 56.81 2.08 5.31 22.85 12.95 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. Work of In Uri In Meth Aslanilation, | Tn Gai ‘ F " ssimilation, Animal. Heriod. Per Cent. Her Cent. and Tissue Por Gent. Building. © Per Cent. Wn seen 8 2 2 5.30 10.17 51.73 32 .80° Ghecucasaeee 1 4.32 14.42 54.12 27.14 Average led mos 4 .81 12.30 52.92 29.97 PERCENTAGE OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY RECOVERED. Computed by Computed by the Kellner’s Method. Writer’s Method. RTE isa. siesta 08 aceness 39.9 38.8 BO Gc usgee. fy008 hates 35.3 33.4 Average ........ 37.6 36.1 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED MATTER (KELLNER), re Work of In Uri Agsteatiett In G n Urine. ; similation, in. Per Cent. 1g Nethen ey and Tissue Per Cant, Building. Per Cent. 4.7 | 122.2 | 651.9 31.2 Average F and G.. | THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 487 Wheat Straw.—Tabulating the results upon wheat straw in the same manner as those for oat straw we have— DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF WHEAT STRAW. Work of , i Digestion, : A In Feces. | In Urine. .ssimia- | In Gain. Animal, | Porioa.| BLASS: | BEUHRE | aethaoe. | tion, and | 2e, Gein: Building. Per Cent. SA semaines aee 1 60.41 1.88 7.96 26.55 3.20 J... 1 56.03 2.85 8.65 24.67 7.80 Average ...|....... 58.21 2.37. 8.31 | 25.61 | 5.50 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. Work of In Uri In Meth: Asietiigen, | In Gai i ; n Urine. n a milation, n Gain. Animal. Period. Per Cent. Per “Cent, ane Tissue Per Cent. Building. Per Cent. became gins 1 4.75 20.11 67.03 8.11 Da teipucistaiar ect Bae 1 6.49 19.67 56.12 17.72 Averages. ce. s|ecee ess 5.62 19.89 61.57 12.92 PERCENTAGE OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY RECOVERED. Computed by Computed by the Kellner’s Method. Writer's Method. Ox TH sxsagencas 11.2 10.8 $8 Dhoaruceas aia s 24.3 24.0 Average ....... 17.8 17.4 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED MATTER (KELLNER). as. EY WPI G irae aia Sales ie oe Sal oherssarare see a a 5.6 Jn MGthaNne cosa ah want we a eae ews ans 20.0 Work of digestion, assimilation, and tissue building. 61.2 In gain.............. Sauls sauerepeel inal Siove wersaate oi Se 13.2 488 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Extracted Straw.—As previously noted in another connection, this material consisted of rye straw which had been treated with an alkaline liquid’ under pressure, substantially as in the manufacture It contained in the water-free state 76.78 per cent. of straw paper. of crude fiber and 19.96 per cent. of nitrogen-free extract. Con- siderable interest attaches to the results obtained upon this sub- stance as representing to a degree the crude fiber of the food of herbivorous animals. Computed as before, these results were: DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY OF EXTRACTED STRAW. Work of i Digestion; ‘ 4 In Feces. | In Urine. os sssimila- | In Gain. Animal. | Period.| Per Gent. | Per Gent. | Methane. | tion, and | per Cent, Building. Per Cent. Fis eticae deat edie 5 11.35 —0.46 12.40 25.11 51.60 Di esata een 5 14,14 -—1.11 12.52 30.85 43 .60 Average ....|...... 12.75 —0.79 12.46 27.98 47.60 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. Work of ' In Uri Tui Methane, || Aastealation In Gai . . : a ssimilation, . Anumal. Period: Per Cent. Per Cont. and Tyasue Per Cent. Building. Per Cent. Een guinea e Sees 5 —0.52 13.99 28 .29 58.24 Diced 2 wad eaiekeed 5 —1.29 14.58 35.89 50.82 Average......./.....- —0.91 14.29 32.09 54.53 PERCENTAGE OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY RECOVERED. Computed b Keliners Method. | ‘Writer's Method, Ox Ls eee 67.5 67.3 Mt Jimea nas eke 58.7 58.6 Average........ 63.1 63.0 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 489 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF DIGESTED MATTER (KELLNER). Average of Hand J. Gol ots seamepemetne tetra err arrre eras ener nes a eprint crear rerer 0.0 Ini methane cuca rsgeladud anenacesdanaeetatad 14.0 Work of digestion, assimilation, and tissue building. 31.7 AN BAIN. es cccawsne ele sat Ca MES ERAN EA ER ETERS 54.3 100.0 As was noted in discussing the results upon metabolizable energy, the treatment to which the straw was submitted left it in a condition in which its digestibility, and consequently its percentage of metabolizable energy, compared favorably with that of starch. As we now see, this analogy extends also to its effect in producing gain, the figures showing in this respect a slight superiority on the part of the extracted straw, as appears from the following summary: RECOVERED IN GAIN. Starch (Kellner’s Experiments on oderate Extracted Straw. Rations). Per cent. of gross energy................- 43.4 47.6 “« «© apparently digested energy... . 53.1 54.5 « «© metabolizable energy.......... 59.0 63.0 The reason for this strikingly high value of the extracted straw as compared with the low value indicated for crude fiber by the results of Zuntz and Wolff will be considered in a subsequent para- graph. Summary.—For convenience of reference the foregoing results may be summarized in the tables on pages 490 and 491, . showing respectively the percentage distribution of the gross energy of the feeding-stuffs, that of the energy of the appar- ently digested organic matter, and the percentage utilization of 49° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the metabolizable energy according to the two methods of com- putation adopted: DISTRIBUTION OF GROSS ENERGY. -| Work of Diges- In In In tion, As-| In Feces. | Urine. “/Methane.| simila- Gain. Per Cent.|/Per Cent.'Per Cent.|tion, and|Per Cent. Tissue ; Building. Per Cent. Concentrated Feeding-stuffs : : Starch, Kiihn’s experiments....} 19.59 |—0.92 | 10.74 | 35.19 | 35.40 «« “Kellner’s experiments, eae moderate rations| 17.61 |—0.66 | 9.21 | 30.64 | 43.20 heavy rations...) 55.91 |—2.07 |—2.49 | 18.75 | 29.90 Oil, average, Sample II........ 52.89 | 0.09 |—8.93 | 18.25 | 37.70 Wheat gluten, Kellner’s expts..} 20.17 | 13.08 | 0.08 | 39.78 | 26.90 Beet molasses, Sample II...... 9.92} 2.92 11.31 | 24.65 | 51:20 Coarse Fodders : Meadow hay...............06- 41.34 | 4.91 5.87 | 27.93 | 19.95 Oat strawWe soc cos see ces mes eas 56.81 2.08 5.31 | 22.85 | 12.95 Wheat straw......... ee 58.21 | 2.37 | 8.31 | 25.61 | 5.50 Extracted straw.............- 12.75 |—0.79 | 12.46 | 27.98 | 47.60 DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY OF APPARENTLY DIGESTED MATTER. eee In a igestion,) Tp pene Methane. fan end on er Cent.|Per Cent.| “Tissue Cent Building. | “°?* Per Cent. Concentrated Feeding-stuffs : | Starch, Kiithn’s experiments ........... —1.19 | 13.42) 43.99 | 43.88 ‘* Kellner’s experiments, moder- ate rations ................. —0.92 11.12} 37.36 | 52.44 “ Kellner’s experiments, heavy : ; TAUONS 60 ac ceusee wes ye ....{|-4.95 |— 6.15) 42.77 | 68.33 Oi, Sample If 2.0 cwsus verse necaee sen —0.53 |—24.35) 41.42 | 83.46 Wheat gluten, Kellner’s experiments....| 16.59 0.02; 49.62 ) 33.71 Coarse Fodders : Meadow hay.............ccccceveeees 8.34 10.78) 49.08 | 31.80. Oat straw... . 0... ccc ecco 4.81 12.30} 52.92 | 29.97 Wheat straw... ... ccc eee c eee eeeeaes 5.62 19.89| 61.57 | 12.92 Extracted straw...............0.e00ee —0.91 14.29) 32.09 | 54.53 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 491 PERCENTAGE UTILIZATION OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY. Real Utilization Apparent as Computed Utilization. by Kellner. By RuMINANTS. - Concentrated Feeding-stuffs : Starch, Kthn’s experiments .............. 49.0 50.0 « ~ Kellner’s expts., moderate rations .. 58.9 58.4 “ ‘ ~ heavy rations...... 58.9 61.5 Oil, Sample I], OXG...... eee eee 59.4 69.4 Wheat gluten, Kellner’s experiments....... 45.2* 40.3 Conglutin, Kern . 1.1.0... 0... cece ee eee f 67.7* Flesh-meal, Kern........... 000s seve eens 65.0* Coarse Fodders : , Meadow hay........ ccs cce bene een eeeeees 41.5 P 1.4 Oat straws. ccssace atoms oats Lo Sade eee 37.6 36.1 Whéat straw 06. .echeccbda Ge cee ow see aes 17.8 17.4 Extracted straw ....... 0.6 cee eee eee eee 63.1 63.0 By Swine. Ricey. deenc dev cske aaaulens cee aetaes 78.0 Barley). 6.8 ss ae 8 owas adele one ose see = 70.9 Mixed grain........ 00.0 cece cece ree eee 68.5 * Of protein. The Expenditure of Energy in Digestion, Assimilation, and Tissue Building.—As was shown in the introductory paragraphs on p. 466, the recorded data do not permit us to distinguish between the energy expended in the digestion, resorption, and assimilation of the various feeding-stuffs experimented upon and the energy which we have reason to believe is required for the conversion of the assim- ilated material into tissue. Accordingly these two factors have been grouped together in the foregoing summaries of results. Some interesting facts are revealed, however, by a comparison of the total expenditure of energy for these two purposes in the several cases. Kellner’s results, as the latest and apparently most accurate and representative, have been made the chief basis of the compari- son, the figures being those computed by the writer and therefore showing the aggregate net effect upon the balance of energy, that is, the “apparent” utilization. Coarse Fopprrs.—A comparison of the coarse fodders with each other brings out the interesting fact that while the percentage of the gross energy recovered in the gain varied from 5.5 to 47.6, 492 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. the percentage expended in digestion, assimilation, and tissue build- ing varied only from 22.85 to 27.98. Expressing the same thing in absolute figures, we have the following: ENERGY PER GRAM OF ORGANIC MATTER. Expended in Diges- Gross, ‘tion, Assimilation, |. Cals. and Tasue 5 Building, Meadow hay........ 4.751 1.327 Oat straw...........| 4.816° | 1.100 Wheat straw........ 4.743 1.214 Extracted straw.....| 4.251 1.190 Average.......... 4.640 1.208 ee In other words, the combined energy required to separate the digestible from the indigestible portion of one gram of organic matter, resorb it, and convert the resorbed portion into tissue was not greatly different for these four materials. They differed widely in their nutritive effect, not because of a greater or less expendi- ture of energy for these purposes, but chiefly because the same expenditure of energy resulted in making a much larger amount of material digestible in some cases than in others. CoNCENTRATED FEEDING-STUFFS.—A still more striking result is reached when we compare the results on coarse fodders with those on concentrated feeding-stufis. Taking the figures of Kellner’s experiments for the latter, and omitting his results on heavy rations of starch, we have the following data for starch, oil, and wheat gluten: ENERGY PER GRAM OF ORGANIC MATTER, Expended in Digestion, Gross, Assimilation, Cals. and Tissue Building, Cals. Starch (Kellner)..... 4.168 1.277 OID exescs 2 panes ad ais 9.464 1.728 Gluten (Kellner) . 5.742 2.284 We thus reach the seemingly paradoxical result that the total expenditure of energy in the production of new tissue is decidedly THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 493 greater in the case of these three materials, and notably the last two, than in the four coarse fodders previously tabulated. The paradox largely disappears, however, when we remember that while the larger share of the work of digéstion has to do with the total dry matter of the food, the work of assimilation and tissue building has to be performed only upon the digested matter, and that the proportion of the latter is much larger in the starch, oil, and gluten than in the coarse fodders. We have already (pp. 375 and 445) seen reason to suppose that the processes of assimilation and tissue building consume a éonsiderable share of the metaboliz- able energy of the food, although we are still ignorant as to how much and as to how the proportion differs with different materials, and the above results serve to confirm this conclusion. If, simply as an illustration, we assume that the uniform pro- portion of 30 per cent. of the metabolizable energy of the several feeding-stuffs is thus consumed, then'if we deduct this amount from the totals above computed we shall have the work of digestion alone as follows: ENERGY PER GRAM OF ORGANIC MATTER. yore pes eas Assimilation Total, Ee: Work of Enerey and Tissue enditure Digestion Alone, (p. 297), Building 2s é io e Cals. Cals. (30 Per Cent. Bree ‘|. of Metaboliz- able), Cals. - Meadow hay............ 2.213 | 0.664 1.327 0.663 | Oat straw............4.. 1.724 0.517 1.100 0.583 0.672 Wheat straw............ 1.475 0.443 1.214 0.771 [-° Extracted straw......... 3.213 0.964 1.190 0.192 Starch (Kellner) ........ 3.079 0.923 1,277 0.354 6] ree ere re 5.298 1.589 1.728 0.139 Wheat gluten (Kellner)..; 3.831 1.149 2.284 1.105 This arbitrary assumption reduces the work of digestion of the starch to about one half that expended upon a like amount of mate- rial in the form of coarse fodders which yield chiefly carbohydrates to the organism. Moreover, we must remember that in the case of starch there is a considerably greater loss of energy in the methane fermentation than with the same amount of total organic matter in coarse fodders, and that this loss is included in the work of diges- tion. The high figure found for the wheat gluten we might be 494 | PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ° inclined to explain by its well-known effect in stimulating the met- abolism in the body—that is, by supposing that for this substance our assumption of 30 per cent. for the work of assimilation and tissue building is too low. The computed work of digestion is small in the case of the oil, as the results obtained in other experiments would lead us to expect. At the same time it should be remembered that the figures given are derived from two experiments only, while a third gave quite different results, showing in particular a decidedly higher figure for the combined work of digestion, assimilation, and tissue building. It is obvious, therefore, that further investigation is necessary to fix the value of oil in this respect. CrupE Fisper.—Finally, it will be observed that our arbitrary assumption results in making the work of digestion of the extracted straw less than two thirds that of starch. We should naturally suppose that the mechanical work involved in digestion would be fully as great in the case of the former as-in that of the latter, while, as the figures for methane show, the extracted straw underwent a more extensive fermentation than the starch. Obviously, the mechanical and chemical treatment to which the straw was sub- jected so modified the cellulose and removed incrusting matters as to produce a material which behaved substantially like starch in the alimentary canal, both as regards its digestibility and its relation to ferments.* Correspondingly, the total work of digestion, assimila- tion, and tissue building is not widely different in the two cases. It is only when we arbitrarily assume a high percentage for the work of assimilation and tissue building, as was done above for the sake of illustrating the general question, that this difference and that in the amount of metabolizable energy combine to give the relatively low figure for digestive work noted above. § 2. Utilization for Muscular Work. When a muscle is subjected to a suitable stimulus (normally a nerve stimulus) there occurs, as we have seen, a sudden and rapid increase in its metabolism. .This increased metabolism appears to * Lehmann (Landw. Jahrb., 24, Supp. I, 118) had previously shown that the apparent digestibility of the crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract of straw and chaff thus treated was increased by from 79 to 133 per cent. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 495 consist largely in a breaking down or cleavage of some substance or substances contained in the muscle, resulting in a rapid increase in the excretion of carbon dioxide and the consumption of oxygen by the animal. In this process of breaking down or cleavage there is a corresponding transformation of energy, a portion of the potential energy of the metabolized material appearing finally as heat, while a part may take the form of mechanical energy. The inquiry naturally arises what proportion of the total energy liberated during the increased metabolism is recovered as mechanical work and what proportion takes the form of the (for this purpose) waste energy of heat. The question is not only one of great theoretical interest to the physiologist, but the efficiency of the working animal regarded as a machine for the conversion of the potential energy of feeding- stuffs into mechanical work is also of the highest practical im- portance. Erriciency or SincLE Muscie.—A large amount of experi- mental work has been devoted to the study of the single muscle as a machine. The subject is a complicated one, and unanimity of views upon it has by no means been attained, especially as to the mechan- ism of muscular contraction. As regards the efficiency of the muscle as a converter of energy, however, one fact is perfectly well estab- lished, viz., that it varies within quite wide limits. If the two ends of a muscle be attached to fixed points, so that it cannot shorten, a suitable stimulus will still cause it to contract in the technical sense of the word; that is, a state of tension will be set up in the muscle tending to pull the two supports nearer together (isometric contraction). In such a contraction there is an expenditure of potential energy and a corresponding increase of muscular metabolism, but no external work is done. In other words, all the potential energy finally takes the form of heat and the mechanical efficiency is zero. This is the case, for example, in the standing animal. A not inconsiderable muscular effort is required to maintain the members of the body in certain fixed positions, and a corresponding generation of heat takes place, but no mechanical work is done. But even when the muscle is free to shorten and thus do mechan- ical work, its efficiency is found to be variable, the chief determin- ing factors being the load and the degree of contraction. The 496 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. maximum efficiency of the muscle is reached when the load is such that the muscle can just raise it, while this maximum load dimin- ishes as the muscle contracts until when the latter reaches the limit of shortening it of course becomes zero. Conversely, if the muscle be stretched beyond what may be called its normal length, as is the case in the living body, the weight which it can lift, and conse- quently its efficiency, is increased. In these respects the muscle behaves like an elastic cord, and some authorities, notably Chau- veau,* regard the essence of muscular contraction as consisting of a direct conversion of the potential energy of the “contractile material” of the muscle into muscular elasticity. EFFIcIency oF THE Living AnIMAL.—According to the above principles the maximum efficiency of a muscle would be obtained when it was loaded.to its maximum at each point in the contraction; that is, when the load diminished uniformly from the maximum corresponding to the initial length of the muscle to zero at the point of greatest contraction. Such conditions, however, rarely if ever obtain in the animal. Of its many muscles some serve largely or wholly to maintain the relative positions of the different parts of the body, and consequently have an efficiency approaching zero. Others contract to a varying extent and under loads less than the maximum. Some muscles, owing to their anatomical relations, work at a less mechanical advantage than others, while the extent to which a given group of muscles is called into action will vary with the nature of the work. If, then, the efficiency of the single muscle is variable, that of the body as a whole would seem likely to be even more so, thus rendering it difficult to draw any trustworthy direct conclusions as to the efficiency of the bodily machine from studies of the effi- ciency of the single muscle. Moreover, the performance of labor by an animal sets up various secondary activities, notably of the circulatory and respiratory organs, which consume their share of potential energy and yet do not contribute directly to the per- formance of the work, and the extent of these secondary activities varies with the nature and the severity of the work. When, there- fore, as is here the case, we consider the whole animal in the light of a machine for converting the potential energy of the food into * Le Travail Musculaire. Paris, 1891. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 497 mechanical work, we are perforce, by the very complexity of the problem, driven to the statistical method of comparing the total income and outgo of energy in the various forms of work. THE UTILIZATION OF NET AVAILABLE ENERGY. Both the activity of the skeletal muscles in the performance of work and the supplementary activity of the muscles concerned in circulation, respiration, etc., is carried on at the expense of energy stored in the muscles themselves or perhaps in the blood which circulates through them. The body thus suffers a loss of energy which is replaced from the energy of the food. If, then, we supply a working animal, in addition to its maintenance ration, with an amount of food exactly sufficient to make good the loss, the total energy metabolized in the performance of the work will repre- sent the net available energy of the excess food, since this by definition is that portion of the gross energy which contributes to the maintenance of the store of potential energy in the body. It is true that in our discussion of the net available energy of the food we regarded it as making good the losses that occur below the maintenance requirement, and the question may arise whether the availability as thus measured is the same as the availability for the production of muscular work. In reality, however, the two cases are not radically different. Even below the point of mainte- nance the internal work of the body consists very largely of muscu- lar work, and it is the energy metabolized in the performance of this work which appears to constitute the chief demand for available food energy. It would appear highly probable, therefore, that the net availability of the metabolizable energy of the food will be found to be substantially the same whether that energy be employed to prevent a loss from the body as a consequence of its internal work below maintenance or on account of the performance of external work above maintenance. If, then, we cause an animal to perform a known amount of external work and measure the increase in the amount of energy metabolized in the body, we may regard the latter as representing net available energy derived from previous food, and a comparison 498 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. of this quantity with the work done will give the coefficient. of utilization for the particular animal and kind of work experi- mented on. The Efficiency of the Animal as a Motor. The relation just indicated between the work performed and the total energy metabolized in its performance is not infrequently re- garded as expressing the efficiency of the animal as a motor, but it. should be clearly understood that this is true only in a limited sense- A coefficient computed in the manner outlined above takes account. only of the loss which occurs in the conversion of the stored energy of the body into external mechanical work. It neither includes the expenditure of energy required for the digestion and assimilation of the food, nor does it take account of the large amount of energy con- tinually consumed in the internal work of the animal machine. It does not, therefore, furnish a direct measure of the economy with which the animal machine uses the energy supplied to it, but is comparable rather to the theoretical thermo-dynamic efficiency of a steam-engine. With this limitation, however, the phrase may_be used as a matter of convenience. Quite extensive investigations upon this point are already on record. They have generally taken the form of what may be called respiration experiments. The respiratory exchange of carbon di- oxide and oxygen has been determined, first, in a state of rest, and, second, during the performance of a measured amount of work. From the difference between these two values the quantity of ma- terial metabolized and the amount of energy consequently liberated have been computed and compared with the energy recovered in the form of mechanical work. This method of experimentation has been largely developed and employed by Zuntz and his associates * in experiments upon man, the dog, and especially the horse. Since the present work relates especially to the nutrition of domestic animals, the results upon the latter animal are of peculiar interest, but their study may be ad- vantageously preceded by a somewhat brief consideration of the results upon the dog and upon man. * Compare Chapter VIII, pp. 251-2 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 499 Experiments on the Dog.—The following expermments by Zuntz,* while not the earliest upon record, may serve to illustrate the general methods employed and as introductory to the more elaborate experiments upon the horse. The following table shows the average oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide excretion, determined by the Zuntz apparatus, of a dog when lying, standing, and performing work upon a tread- power, and also the amount of work done, all computed per minute: Respiration per . Weight Minute. © Work per Minute. of a No of ma! x= oe Dis- jood, | Ben Oxy- | COs, — Wo | Nor | tance Ke ments. gen | c.c. Quo- |Ascent: Draft, | travel- Es. C.c. tient. | Kgm.| Kgm. Monts GP Dying) seve aa eda ewan ea 174.3) 12427) O271 |ovcess|es scare sf (Magnus-Levy) ..| 172. | 123.8] 0.72 |......J...... 2 |Standing . ........... 245.6] 170.2} 0.69 |......]...... 26.932 8 Ascending slight incline.| 725.3] 525.2) 0.73 13.23]...... 78.566 26.674 5 steeper ~* .|1285.3] 990.6] 0.77 |365.82)...... 79.497 27.175 10 | Draft nearly horizontal ./1028.8] 798.9] 0.77 22.83/202.91| 70.420 The work per minute as given in the above table does not in- clude the energy expended in horizontal locomotion. The work of draft is the product of the distance traversed into the draft; the work of ascent equals the same distance multiplied by the sine of the angle of ascent. A remarkable increase (41 per cent.) in the metabolism when standing over that when lying was observed (compare p. 343) but does not enter into the subsequent com- putations. The two experiments on ascending a grade afford data for com- puti :g the increased metabolism corresponding, on the one hand, to one gram-meter of work done against gravity, and, on the -other, to the transportation of one kilogram through one meter horizontally. The latter, of course, is not work in the mechanical sense, but it requires the consumption of a certain amount of material, the liberated energy being employed in successive liftings of the body and in overcoming internal resistances and ultimately appearing as heat. It includes, of course, the increased metab- olism required for the maintenance of the erect position. * Arch. ges. Physiol., 68, 191. 500 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. If from the totals given in the table we subtract the figures for rest, we have the following as the increments of the respiration due.to the work, including the work of standing: * | | Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, cc. Ascending slight incline. . 551.0 400.5 steeper “‘ 1111.0 865.9 The weight of the animal and the distance traversed having differed somewhat, the results may be rendered comparable by com- puting them per kilogram of weight and per meter of distance trav- ersed—that is, by dividing in each case by the product of weight into distance. Expressing the results in gram-meters and cubic millimeters for convenience we have— Oxygen Carbon Dioxide | Work of Ascent, c.mm, cmm. gr.-m. Ascending slight incline.. 260.40 189.27 6.252 steeper “ .... 523 .93 408 .35 172.512 If we let x equal the oxygen consumption required for the trans- portation of 1 kg. through 1 meter and y that required per gram- meter of work of ascent we have z+ 6.252y=260.40 c.mm. x+172.512y= 523.93 c.mm. whence we have z=250.49 e.mm. y= 1.585 ¢.mm. A similar computation for the carbon dioxide gives Locomotion, per kg. and meter....... 181.033 e.mm. Per gram-meter of work of ascent. . 1.317 c.mm. and the corresponding respiratory quotient is 0.723. With these data in hand it is easy to compute the increased respiratory exchange corresponding to one gram-meter of work of draft as follows: THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 501 Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, 7 . c.c. c.c. fe) 0) ae eee 1028 .80 798.90 ROS. saaana at sages edna See snore taatn arene 174.30 124.70 Transportation of 27.175 kgs. through 70.42 meters........} 479.36 346.55 Ascent—22.83 kgm............ 36.19 30.07 TOtalidcc cstv ode Gerwae os ae 689.85 501 .32 Remains for draft............. 338 .95 297 .58 For one gram-meter of work of draft we have, therefore, OXYGEN fnuiasaieta bees meee eeead 1.6704 c.mm Carbon dioxide............2..2-00-- 1.467 e.mm Respiratory quotient................ 0.878 It appears from the above that the work of draft required somewhat more metabolism than the same amount of work of ascent. The individual experiments of this and other series like- wise show that variations in the speed and in the angle of ascent affect the result. For the present, however, we may confine our- selves to a consideration of the average figures. It remains to compute from the results for oxygen and carbon dioxide the corresponding amounts of energy liberated. The data are insufficient for an exact computation. It having been shown, however (compare Chapter VI), that even severe work causes but a slight increase in the proteid metabolism, the author assumes that the additional metabolism in these experiments was entirely at the expense of carbohydrates and fat and computes the proportion of each from the respiratory quotient. The results are admittedly not exact. Besides the uncertainty just mentioned, there is the possibility that irregularities in the excretion of carbon dioxide may affect the respiratory quotient in short trials and, more- over, we must bear in mind the possibility of various cleavages and hydrations as affecting the evolution of energy in such experi- ments (compare Berthelot’s criticism on p. 254). The author does not, however, regard these possible errors as very serious. Com- puted on this basis the results are as follows, expressed both in terms of heat (calories) and in gram-meters (1 cal. equals 425 gram-meters) : 502 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. For 1 gram-meter, ascent.......... 0.0076681 cal. =3.259 gr.-m. ey, MW draftiescs ces aes 0.008180 “ =3.476 “ “* locomotion per kg. and meter.. 1.1787 cals. =500.95 “ According to the above figures the performance of one gram- meter of work required the metabolizing of material whose potential energy was equal to 3.259 gr.-m. in the one case and 3.476 gr.-m. in the other. In other words, these amounts of net available energy were liberated in the kinetic form in the body, one gram-meter in each case being recovered as external work while the remainder ultimately took the form of heat. This is equivalent to a utilization of 30.7 per cent. of the net available energy in ascent and of 28.77 per cent. in draft. It is to be noted that these figures refer only to that portion of the in- creased metabolism which is applied to the production of external work and do not include that necessary for the transportation of the animal’s weight. The corresponding ratio for this portion could only be obtained on the basis of complicated and uncertain compu- tations of the mechanical work of locomotion. If, however, instead of this we assume that this most common form of muscular activity is performed with the same economy as the work of ascent, we can conversely compute the mechanical work of locomotion for 1 kg. through 1 meter as 500.95 gr.-m. X .307= 153.8 gr.-m. Experiments on Man.—In connection with his experiments on the dog already described, Zuntz * cites the results of a number of experiments with man upon the work of locomotion and of ascent, the average results of which are summarized in the table opposite, to which have been added the results of later experiments by Frentzel & Reach.t Experiments on the Horse.—Very extensive investigations on the production of work by the horse have been made by Zuntz in conjunction with Lehmann and Hagemann.{ Some of the results of these investigations have already been discussed in their bearing on the question of digestive work (pp. 385-393), and the method * Loc. cit., p. 208. + Arch. ges Physiol., 88, 494. } Landw. Jahr., 18, 1; 23, 125; 27, Supp ITI. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 5°03 Energy Expended in bb Hortzontal Experimenter. _ a Oey. Grade, ee ao le ar Mute, Per Cent. Kgs. per Kg. ‘Ascent, Meters. a Sonos Kem. Katzenstein .......... 55.5 0.334 2.857 74.48 9.6-13.3 f he ott 3.190 71.32) 6.5 . 211 3.140 71.46 . Schumburg & Zuntz+| 9’ | 0.288 | 3.563 | 51.23 ceenania lL} 88.2 0.263 3.555 43.34 § salibaes 72.6 0.284 2.913 62.04 Loewy............-. 1 81.1 0.231 2.921 60.90 }|23.0-30.5 80.0 0.244 2.729 56.54 Frentzel: Normal gait.........| 86.5 0.219 Le 746 66.94 Slow MC Sessa sas] SOed 0.233 a { Serr Reach: $23.3 Normal gait.........] 65.8 0.230 9 846 a ae | Slow OF co diaedenoi mia) ODBS 0.251 ; { 34.58 of computing the total metabolism in the rest experiments has been explained; it remains to consider the results of the work experiments. The larger proportion of the experiments were upon the same horse (No. III), and the summaries and averages on subsequent pages represent chiefly the results with this animal. The work was done upon a special tread-power located in the open air, and during the rest experiments the animal likewise stood in the tread-power. The inclination of the platform of the power could be varied, and it could also be driven by a steam-engine, so that by setting it horizontal the work performed by the animal was reduced to that of locomotion alone. The distance traversed was measured by a revolution-counter, and in the experiments on draft the animal pulled against a dynamometer. The large number of experiments (several hundred) are grouped by the authors into fourteen periods according to the season (winter or summer) and the kind and amount of food consumed, each of these periods including a considerable number of experiments both on rest and on different forms of work. On each day from two to eight experiments were usually made, some on rest and some on work of various sorts. The average of all the rest experiments in each period is then compared with similar averages for the various 504 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. kinds of work in order to eliminate so far as possible the influence of variations in external temperature and in the feeding, as well as to reduce the probable error of experiment. Work at a Watx.—The experiments may be grouped into those in which the work was performed respectively at a walk and a trot. Those of the former category, being the more numerous, may be considered first. Work of Locomotion.—The following detailed comparison of the experiments of Period a upon rest and upon walking without load or draft will serve'to further explain the method: ' REST EXPERIMENTS. PERIOD a. Ration, 6 Kg. Oats, 1 Kg. Straw, 6-7 Kg Hay. Per Kg Live Weight : end Minute: Respira- | Air Tem- | Relative Hours No. of Experiment. |__| __ tory perature | Velocity | Since Last Carbon Quotient. | Deg.C. | of Wind. | Feeding. Oxygen | Dioxide wey c.c. BUGS oaiyvan pic cnisenes 3.94 3.81 0.968 | —5.0 0 3.0 BOD ie weer cwere os 3.92 4.02 1.025 | —0.5 1 2.5 SS) cveGeecsmanves 3.98 3.42 0.861 2.0 1 5.6 B90s i inaees neeees 4.06 4.04 0.997 5.3 3 2.0 44Gs..2 walne sores s 4.11 3 86 0.940 4.7 1 1.5 A DGh is cate ates 3.89 3.63 0.933 2.0 1 3.5 AOD se csescocvGsormneutteines 3.71 3.44 0.929 9.0 3 1.5 Average ....... 3.94 3.75 0.950 2.5 1.4 28 Corrected*..... 4.04 3.86 In the same period eight experiments were made in which the -:zad-power was set as nearly horizontal as possible and driven by the steam-engine, the animal being simply required to maintain his place on the power. The results for oxygen were as shown in the first portion of the following table: * A comparison of Zuntz’s method with the results obtained in the Pet- tenkofer respiration apparatus showed that the gaseous exchange through the skin and intestines amounted to about 24 per cent. of the pulmonary respiration in case of the oxygen and 3 per cent in case of the carbon di- oxide. These additions are accordingly made to the figures of the respira- tion experiments and the results designated as “ corrected.” THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. — 505 WALKING WITHOUT LOAD OR DRAFT. PERIOD a. Per Kg. Live Weight. Observed. F ; Oxygen Equivalent No. of Live Per Minute. ay er Experiment. | Weight Work of Kgs. : Ascent, Distance | Work of |Per Meter | Per | Per Meter Oxygen | Traveled | Ascent, | Traveled. |Minute,| Traveled. C.c. Meters. Kgm. Gr.-m. c.c. c.mm. AOE: seie vanes 429 9.0 57 0.57 10 5.1 89 44b......... 434 11.3 87 0.84 10 7.3 84 BD ssc x tue 428 12.2 94 0.89 9 8.2 88 45d......... 428 12.7 95 0.87 9 8.7 92 46b......... 430 10.8 92 0.70 8 6.9 74 AGC see etes 430 11.7 99 0.74 8 7.8 79 TD ic ie oe i 434 12.3 98 0.79. 8 8.4 86 BUC vccseinaisnets 434 11.2 93 0.76 8 7.3 78 Average ...| 430.9 | 11.405 | 89.338 | 0.764 8.643 | 7.463) 83.793 Corrected 2) s scsi ds ceccns Sb el] a'g cranes le deo eaves Sexakadie «| ogee 85.888 If from the oxygen consumption in each of the above experiments we subtract the average rest value for the same period (3.94 c.c.) the remainder will represent the increase due to the work, as shown in the seventh column, and this divided by the distance traveled gives the figures of the eighth column. The average respiratory quotient of that part of the respiration due to the work in these eight experiments was 0.894. On the very probable assumption that the work caused no material change in the metabolism of either proteids * or crude fiber, or in other words, that the energy for work was derived substantially from solu- ble carbohydrates and fat, the calorific equivalent of 1 ¢.c. of oxygen is computed and the following calculation of energy made for the average of the eight experiments (compare pp. 76 and 251). These results are not corrected for cutaneous and intestinal respiration. Per Kg. Live Weight per Minute. Oxygen combined with fat ............... 3.4415 ¢.c. Oxygen combined with starch............. 4.0215 “ Totals: aiincccneenvr en eiwade eaueiia ves 7.4630 “ Equivalent energy .........-.-...5-- 36.420 cals. * The authors show that even a considerably increased proteid meta- bolism would not materially affect the computation of energy. 506 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Energy per Meter Traveled (Including Work of Ascent). Per kg. total mass * ...... 6.2.0 ee eee eeee 0.3948 cal. 73 Per kg. live weight ..... ea gdaly de daciwicaness Heel kem. Work of ascent ....... 0.00 c ccc ee eens 8.643 gr.-m. Determinations of the work of locomotion were made in six different periods, or thirty-five experiments in all. The average for each period, computed in terms of energy as in the above example, is given in Table VIII of the Appendix. It is to be noted that these results still include the small amount of work expended in ascending the slight incline. This factor is determined in the manner shown in the following paragraph. Work of Ascent.—In four periods experiments were ans (thir- teen in all) upon the work of ascending a moderate grade at a walk. The average results, computed on the same basis as before, are contained in Table IX of the Appendix. By comparing the average results of these two series of experi- ments in the manner explained on p. 500, letting x equal the oxygen or energy required per kilogram live weight for locomotion through 1 meter horizontally and y the corresponding quantities for the performance of 1 gram-meter of work of ascent we have the follow- ing equations: For Oxygen. z+ 4.395y= 83.480 c.mm. 2+107.041y=222.941 c.mm. For Energy. t+ 4.395y=0.4035 cal. 2+107.041y=1.0795 cals. Solving these we obtain the following values respectively for the work of locomotion per meter and for the energy expended in ae: Energy. c mm. cals. Kem. Locomotion per meter: Per kg. live weight............. 77.509 0.3746 0.1592 total mass............ 75 .048 0.3618 0.1538 Ascent, per kilogram-meter...... 1359 .00 6.5858 2.7990 * Weight of animal plus weight of apparatus carried. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 5°7 doing 1 kgm. of work of ascent, and the utilization of the available energy in the latter case is 35.73 per cent. Work of Draft.—For the work of draft at a walk, up a slight incline, the results tabulated in Table X of the Appendix were obtained. Giving z and y the same significance as before, and letting z represent the oxygen or energy corresponding to one gram-meter of work of draft, we have the following equation, based on the results per kilogram live weight and meter traveled: x+5.115y+153.127z2= 306.561 cmm.=1.5021 cals. Substituting in this the average values of x and y obtained as in- dicated in the previous paragraph, but from a larger number of experiments, we have 2=1.4504 c.mm.= .007143 cal. per gram-meter. The above details of a few of the experiments may serve to illus- trate the methods of computation employed. Similar determina- tions were made upon various forms of work under differing condi- tions, the results of which will be given later. Correction for Speed.—Before final data could be obtained, however, it was found necessary to take account of the speed of the animal, since comparisons of the various periods showed that the metabolism due to the work of locomotion at a walk increased materially as the velocity increased. To compute the necessary correction, the authors divide the thirty-five experiments of Table VIII into three groups according to the speed. For each group the oxygen and energy correspond- ing to the work of ascent are computed, using the values of y given on the previous page (1359 c.mm.; 6.5858 cals.), and subtracted from the total, leaving the following as the amounts per kilogram live weight due to horizontal locomotion: Oxygen F Oxygen Re- | Increase of | Heat Value No. of Velocity Chaeuned Respira- | calculated to Oxyes per | of Oxygen Experi-| per Minute, per Kg. tory Respiratory eter er Meter ments. Meters. and Meter, | Quotient. | Quotient of | Velocity, | (Corrected). c.mm. 0.86, c.mm. c.mm,. cals, 6 78.00 66.69 0.896 67 .32 0.697 0.3363 20 90.16 76.04 0.848 75.80 0.683 0.3787 9 98.11 80.97 0.873 BE 28 | icy enaeccns 0.4058 508 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. On the average, an increase of 1 meter per minute in the speed was found to cause an increased metabolism corresponding to— * OXY ZEN) ost lotaednihesaweed es 0.692 c.mm. HGP GY oi. sd ceo e eee eats 0.00345 cal. . A similar computation for the experiments on ascending a con- siderable grade without load or draft showed a similar difference, which, however, seemed to be chiefly or entirely due to variations in the work of locomotion. When the amount of the latter was computed with the correction for speed just given, the metabolism due to the actual work of ascent seemed to be independent of the speed, the only exception being two experiments at a rapid walk in which over exertion of the animal was suspected. In the thirteen experiments on the work of ascending a moderate grade contained in Table IX, the average speed was 81.95 meters per minute, while in the thirty-five experiments with which they are compared (Table VIII) the average speed was 90.16 meters. From the table on p. 506 we compute that the consumption of oxygen (R.Q.=0.86) and the corresponding energy values per kilo- gram and meter at these speeds would be— | Oxygen. | Energy, c.mm. cals. At 90.16 M. velocity wees ee 75.80 0.3746 we Me 81,95 Mi i aoe 70.05 0.3462 Substituting this corrected value of x in the equations on p. 506, we ha ave as the corrected value of y per kilogram-meter for ascending gnoderate grade -6.851 cals. =2.912 kom. =34.3 per cent. In bef a correction for the value of z is computed. using the first value of y, and then this corrected value of z is used to com- pute the corrected value of y. In other words, the method is one of approximation, but the errors of the corrected values are pre- sumably less than the unavoidable errors of experiment. Effect of Load.—In a number of experiments the horse carried on the saddle a load, consisting of lead plates, corresponding to that of arider. The mere sustaining of such a weight at rest was found THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 599 to increase the gaseous exchange, the total metabolism being sub- stantially proportional to the total mass (horse+ load), but in com- puting the work experiments the same rest values are used as for the preceding experiments; that is, the results include the work required to simply sustain the weight as well as that required to move it. Computing the results in the same manner as before the authors obtain for an average speed of 90.18 meters per minute the following results: Locomotion per Meter. Per kg. live weight ......... 0.5004 cal. = 0.2126 kgm. «© total mass.......... 0.3914 “ =0.1663 “ Ascent. Per kilogram-meter ........ 6.502 cals. = 2.7640 “ = 36.19% A comparison of these figures with those on p. 506 shows that for this animal a load of 127 kgs. caused about 8 per cent. increase in the energy expended, per kg. of total mass, in horizon- tal locomotion, but no increase in that expended per kilogram- meter in ascent. 7 Work of Descent.—In descending a grade the force of gravity acts with instead of against the animal and tends therefore to diminish the metabolism. On the other hand, however, as the steepness of the grade increases the animal is obliged to put forth muscular exertions to prevent too rapid a descent, and this tends to increase the metabolism. It was found that an inclination of 2° 52’ caused the maximum decrease in the metabolism. At 5° 45’ the metabolism was the same as at 0°, while on steeper grades it was greater than on a level surface. Work At a Tror.—A smaller number of experiments were made upon work at a trot under varying conditions. In trotting, the up and down motion of the body is much greater than in walking, while but a small part of the muscular energy thus expended is available for propulsion. It was therefore to be expected that the energy required for horizontal locomotion would be greater at a trot than at a walk, and the results of the experiments corresponded fully with this expectation, the computed energy per meter being found to be Per kg. live weight..............6. ee 0.5660 cal. “ «mass (horse+load)............. 0.5478 “ 510 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. at a speed of 195 meters per minute. The fact of such an increased expenditure of energy in trotting as compared with walking has also been confirmed by the results of Grandeau, which will be con- sidered in another connection. It was also found that in trotting, unlike walking, the work of locomotion was independent of the speed within the limits experimented upon (up to a speed of 206 meters per minute, or about 74 miles per hour). Aload of 127.2kgs. increased the work of locomotion per kg. of mass by about 10 per cent. as compared with the increase of 8 per cent. at a walk. One experiment on work of ascent and one on horizontal draft, both without load, showed a utilization of, respectively, 31.96 per cent. and 31.70 per cent., but two other experiments on horizontal draft, in which the work was thought to have been excessive, gave an average of only 23.35 per cent. Summary.—The final results of the experiments upon the horse may be summarized as follows: Work at a Walk. Work at a Slow Trot. Available Ener, Expended. si a sip sees ta alee Per : Per Cent Cent. cals. Kgm. cals. Kgm For 1 kgm. work of ascent, without toad : 10.7% grade............. 6.8508'2.9116/34.3 | 7.3647*/3.1300*/31 .96* 18.1% grade............. 6.9787|2 .9660/33 .7 For 1 kgm. work of ascent, with load : 15.8% grade............. 6.502 |2.7634/36.2 For 1 kgm. work of draft. 0.5% grade...... 20.000. 7.5190/3,1960/31.3 | ee hee ae 8.5% grade............. 10 .3360|4 .3930|22.7 Locomotion per kg mass per meter without load : Speed of 78.00 M. per min.| 0.3256 ) «90.16 “ © | 0.3666) b....J...... 0.5478t “ # O8JTe “ « 0.3929 \ The same with load : Speed of 90.18 M per min. 0.3914]....../...... 0.6007t * Single experiment. { Two experiments. Work probably excessive. } Independent of speed. ~ THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 511 : Conditions Determining Efficiency. From the results recorded in the preceding paragraphs it appears that, as we were led to expect from a consideration of the efficiency of the single muscle, the efficiency of the animal as a converter of potential energy into mechanical work varies with the nature of the work and the conditions under which it is performed, although the variations are perhaps hardly as great as might have been expected. In general, we may say that in the neighborhood of one third of the potential energy directly consumed in muscular exertion is recov- ered as mechanical work. This appears to be a high degree of effi- ciency as compared with that of any artificial transformer of poten- tial energy yet constructed. The steam-engine, the chief example of such transformers, even in its most highly perfected forms, rarely utilizes over 15 per cent. of the potential energy of the fuel, while in ordinary practice one half of this efficiency is considered a good result. The comparison is misleading. however, for three reasons: First, the figures given in the preceding pages relate to the utilization of the net available energy of the food. As we have seen, however, a certain expenditure of energy in digestion and assimilation is required to render the food energy available, while still another portion of the latter is lost in the potential energy of the excreta. In the case of herbivorous animals. these two sources of loss very materially reduce the percentage utilization when computed upon the gross energy of the food. Second, the comparison takes no account of the large amount of energy consumed continually throughout the twenty-four hours for the internal work of the body of the animal, and which continues irrespective of whether the animal is used as a motor or not. Third, the expenditure of energy in locomotion is not considered in computing the efficiency of one third. When these three points are allowed for but little remains of the apparent superiority of the animal as a prime motor, even omitting from consideration the greater cost of his fuel (food). It remains now to consider somewhat more specifically the in- fluence upon the efficiency of the animal machine of some of the more important conditions. 512 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Kinp oF Work.—Of the forms of work investigated, that of ascent, that is, of raising the weight of the body (with or without load), appears to be the one which is performed most economically. The horse in ascending a moderate grade without load showed an efficiency of 34.3 per cent., while with a load of 127 kgs. a slightly higher efficiency was obtained, viz., 36.2 per cent. (The latter figure, however, includes some estimated corrections for speed.) For the dog (p. 502) the average result was 30.7 per cent. For man the figures of the table on p. 503 correspond to from 28.1 to 36.6 per cent. The efficiency, however, was found to decrease with the steep- ness of the grade. Thus with the horse it fell from 34.3 to 33.7 per cent., with an increase of the grade from 10.7 to 18.1 per cent. The experiments of Loewy on man, averaged on p. 503, show the same result in a more striking manner. Taking separately the experiments on each subject we have the following: | Efficiency. Grade Per Cent. A. L. re ie LZ Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. 23 34.3 36.1 36.6 30.5 34.3 32.6 36 6 36.6 29.0 32.3 32.2 The work of horizontal locomotion consists largely of successive liftings of the weight of the body. It might therefore be expected from the above results that this work would be performed even more economically than that of ascent, since it is obviously the form of muscular activity for which animals like the horse and dog are specially adapted. In the case of the walking horse, Kellner * has proposed a formula. based on mechanical considerations, for com- puting the work of locomotion. Zuntz + has applied this formula to the animal used in his experiments and computed the mechanical work of locomotion at the three speeds for which the total metabo- lism was also determined (p. 507). Landw. Jahrb., 9 658. ft Ibid , 27, Supp IIL. p 314. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 513 A comparison of these figures, expressing the total metabolism in its mechanical equivalent, is as follows: Per Kg. Mass and Meter. Speed arin Total Cc ted ADE: 9 ompure: Percentage Metabolism. Work : Graco ometard: Gian are Efficiency. 78.00 138.4 49.14 35.5 90.16 155.8 54.54 35.00 98.11 167.0 58.40 34.97 This computation gives an efficiency slightly greater than that obtained for the ascent of a grade without load, and in so far tends to confirm our conjecture, but the basis on which the work of loco- motion is computed can hardly be regarded as sufficiently accurate to give this result the force of a demonstration. The work of draft appears to be performed considerably less economically than that of ascent gr locomotion. Thus, for the horse, the efficiency for nearly horizontal draft was found to be 31.3 per cent. at a walk, and in one experiment at a trot 31.7 per cent., as against 34-36 per cent. for ascent. In two other experiments at a trot, in which the work may have been excessive, a much lower efficiency was found, viz., 23.4 per cent. For draft up a grade of 8.5 per cent. at a walk the efficiency was greatly reduced, viz., to 22.7 per cent. The above figures refer to the work of draft only, after deducting the energy required for locomotion and ascent. A similar difference was likewise observed with the dog (p. 502), the efficiency in nearly horizontal draft being 28.8 per cent. as compared with 30.7 per cent. for work of ascent. Experiments on man, not cited in the above pages, in which the work was performed by turning a crank, have shown decidedly lower figures for the percentage utilization. Sprep anp Gart.—The energy expended by the horse in loco- motion at a walk was found to increase with the speed at the rate of 0.00334 cal. per meter and kilogram mass for each in- crease of 1 meter in the speed per minute. Kellner’s mechanical analysis of the work of locomotion mentioned above divides it into two parts, viz., that expended in lifting the body of the 514 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. animal and that experided in imparting motion to the. legs. The former portion is regarded as constant, while the latter portion would increase with the speed. The very close proportionality between the work thus computed and the total metabolism, as shown by the table on the preceding page, is a strong confirma- tion of the correctness of both methods and places the conclusion as to the influence of speed upon metabolism beyond reasonable doubt. It is to be remembered, however, that it is the total metabolism per kilogram and meter which increases with the speed. The percentage utilization of the energy, so far as the data at our command enable us to determine, apparently remains constant. Practically, however, it is the former fact which interests us, since the expenditure of energy in locomotion is comparable to that in internal work and has only an indirect economic value. A similar effect of speed on the metabolism in horizontal locomotion was observed by Zuntz* in experiments on man. In those with the dog, on the other hand, the variations in speed were between 64.2 and 85.9 meters per minute, but no material difference in the metabo- lism due to locomotion was observed. In trotting, a horse expends much more energy per unit of hori- zontal distance than in walking. Thus, trotting at an average speed of 195 meters per minute (a little over 7 miles per hour), as compared with walking at an average speed of 90.16 meters per minute, gave the following results for the metabolism per kilo- gram mass and meter distance. TTOUUN Gs. eer aesiess Vasher Sk CA 0.5478 cal. Welling... 6 Sudenie cata Su ateene 0.3666 “ On the other hand, speed is, so to speak, obtained more econom- ically at the trot than at the walk. In the averages just given the speed was increased by 116 per cent., while the metabolism was in- creased by only 49 per cent. The same result is reached in another way by computing, by means of the factor given at the beginning of this paragraph (0.00334 cal.), the theoretical walking speed which would give a metabolism equal to the average metabolism in trot- ting. We find this to be 147 meters per second, as compared with 195 meters at a trot. Moreover, it was found that at the trot the metab- olism did not increase with the speed, within the limits of the ex- * Arch, ges. Physiol., 68, 198, THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 515 periments. These, however, did not include speeds above 206 meters per minute (about 74 miles per hour), and the work was done on a tread-power, so that there was no air resistance. At this moderate speed it is not probable that the latter factor would be a large one, but it is one which increases as the square of the velocity, so that at high speeds it constitutes the larger portion of the resistance. At high speeds, too, the muscles contract to a greater degree, thus decreasing their efficiency, and additional auxil- iary muscles are called into play, both directly and to aid the in- creased respiration. It is a matter of common experience that while a horse is able to travel for a number of miles consecutively at 6 to 7 miles per hour, drawing a considerable load, he can maintain his highest speed for only a short time even without load, and does this only at the cost of largely increased metabolism. It is evident then that there is a limit beyond which an increase of trotting speed must increase the metabolism with comparative rapidity. Loap.—Supporting a load on the back while standing was found to increase the metabolism of the horse No. III approximately in proportion to the load—that is, the metabolism computed per-unit of mass (horse+load) increased but very slightly. In locomotion with a load the metabolism is, of course, increased, since the load as well as the body of the animal must be lifted at each step. The increase over the metabolism at rest and without load, both walking and trotting, was found in the case of Horse III to be somewhat greater (8-10 per cent.) than the increase in the mass moved (horse + load). After making allowance for this increase in the work of locomo- tion, the efficiency in ascent with a load was found to be unaffected by the latter; that is, the energy expended in lifting a unit of mass (horse+load) through a unit of distance remained substantially the same. Indeed the figure obtained (36.2 per cent.) is slightly higher than that without load (34.3 per cent.). Interesting indi- vidual differences in the above particulars were, however, observed between Horse No. III and some of the other animals experimented upon, particularly Nos. II and XIII, which form the subject of a succeeding paragraph. Species AND Size or ANIMAL.—In ascending a moderate grade, the efficiency seems to be about the same in the horse and in 516 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. man, while in the dog it is apparently somewhat less, as is seen from the following comparison: Grade, Efficiency, Per Cent. Per Cent. Man 5 geicar suas cee 23 35.7 = ~ MOPS vain su aang’ arete 10.7 34.3 ae ee eee 18.1 . 33.7 DOg sieves ew vee cee 17.2 30.7° The energy expended in horizontal locomotion, on the other hand, showed more marked differences, viz.: Energy Expended Speed, Met | per Minute. re ee DOR seis doweneccats 78.57 0.501 Manigiectin scons oie 42 .32-74.48 0. 211-0 .334 Horses jis cies aed 78.00 0.138 The relatively high figure for the dog is perhaps due in part to the considerable muscular effort apparently required (p. 499) to main- tain the erect posture. It has been shown by v. Hésslin,* however, by a mechanical analysis of the work of locomotion, that the latter does not increase as rapidly as the weight of the animal, but in proportion to its two-thirds power, or, in other words, approximately in proportion to the surface. If we compare the experiments upon different species of animals on this basis—that is, if we divide the total energy expended by the animal for locomotion by the product of the distance traversed into the two-thirds power of the weight —we obtain the following figures: DOR essraco oi iiaietateate ihe oes Peeters 1.501 kgm. Matt oceania eared semoxe 0.861-1.274 kom. HOSE ssasptns scutes secede cieareese olay dias 1.058 kgm. Computed in this way, the figures for the horse and those for man at a comparable speed (74.48 M. per min.) do not differ greatly, and v. Hésslin’s conclusions are to this extent confirmed. The figures for the dog still remain higher than the others. If, in the case of * Archiv f. (Anatomie u.) Physiol., 1888, p. 340. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 517 this animal, we compare the total metabolism in locomotion with that during standing instead of lying, as was done in the case of the horse, the figure is reduced to 1.303 kgm., or not much higher than in the case of man. It must be remembered, however, that the figures above given for man include the metabolism due to standing. InprvipvaLity.—Zuntz & Hagemann’s investigations show that the efficiency of the horse is affected to a considerable degree by the individual differences in animals. The experiments whose results are summarized on p. 510 were upon a single animal (No. III). In addition to these a small number of experiments were made with several other animals, mostly old and more or less worthless ones, besides the considerable number upon Horse No. II previously reported by Lehmann & Zuntz.* The results are com- puted by the authors in terms of energy and corrected for speed upon the basis of the results obtained with Horse No. III. In a single case the work of ascent required slightly less expen- diture of energy than with Horse No. III, and in another case the work of horizontal locomotion, computed to the same live weight in proportion to the two-thirds power of the latter (see the oppo- site page) was also less than for Horse No. III, but as a rule these old, defective horses gave higher results. For ascent, omitting one exceptional case, the range was as follows: Per Kgm. of Work. Minimum....... 5.906 cals. = 39.84 per cent. efficiency Maximum....... 9.027 “ =26.07 “ “ ee Horse No. III... 6.851 “ =34.30 “ “ With one very lame horse (string-halt) the figures reached the maximum of 12.343 cals., or an efficiency of only 16.6 per cent. A similar range was observed in the results on horizontal loco- motion. Reduced to a speed of 78 M. per minute and to the live weight of No. III, the range was as follows: Per Meter and Kilogram Live Weight. Minimum..........02 cece cece eee eeees 284 eal. Maximum... ... cece cece cece e ee eee eenes 0.441 “ ‘Horse Now lL i iiesece a eae serena sees 0.336 “ * Landw. Jahrb., 18, 1. 518 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The very lame horse mentioned above gave a still higher figure, , 0.566 cal. A somewhat larger number of experiments with Horse No. XIIi brought out the interesting fact that the increase in the metabo- lism caused by carrying a load on the back was markedly less than in the case of No. III, both at rest and in motion. PER KILOGRAM MASS (HORSE + LOAD). Without Load, With Load, cals. per Minute. | cals. per Minute. Standing : Horse TTD ye x tin 15.990 14.670 TID es staves oes 18.311 18.389 Walking horizontally: ‘| cals. per Meter. | cals. per Meter. Horse XIII......... 0.389 0.388 Be LTT fostoul deere ares 0.367 0.391 Trotting Horizontally : A Horse XTII......... _ 0.553 0.488 HE TD eerste wed wai i 0.548 0.601 While, without load, Horse No. XIII showed a greater metabo- lism, both while walking and trotting than did Horse No. III, the additional effort required for carrying a load was relatively less, so that in every case the metabolism per unit of mass, instead of increasing, remained unchanged or even diminished. The percent- age efficiency of the animal in ascending a grade was also not materially affected by the load, while with Horse No. III it ap- peared to increase slightly. The experiments with Horse No. II previously reported,* when recalculated } in the same manner as the later ones, likewise show interesting individual differences. For horizontal locomotion, after correcting for varying speeds, we have per kilogram mass (horse + load) the following: Horse No. II, | Horse No. III, cals. per Meter. | cals. per Meter, Walking without load 0.415 0367 with load........... 0.385 0.391 ‘Trotting without load 0.499 0.548 ef with load........... 0.415 0.601 * Landw. Jahrb., 18, 1. ft Ibtd., 27, Supp. III, 355. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 519 As these figures show, No. II was decidedly inferior to No. III in walking without load. In trotting, on the other hand, he was somewhat the superior of No. III, or in other words the change from walking to trotting caused much less increase in his metabo- lism. Like No. XIII, he carried a load with decidedly less expendi- ture of energy than did No. III. For the forms of work in which the percentage efficiency could be measured the results were as follows, the grades, however being not exactly the same for No. II as for No. III: Horse No. II, Horse No. III, Per Cent. er Cent. Ascending, moderate erads.s 33.2 34.3 heavier grade.. 31.7 33.7 Draft, nearly horizontal...... 29.0 31.3 “up a grade............ 22.4 22.7 It seems a fair presumption that such individual differences as those above instanced are caused, in large part at least, by differences in the conformation of the animals resulting from heredity or “spontaneous”: variation. A strain of horses which has beencbred and trained especially for the saddle through a number of generations might very naturally be expected to be more efficient in carrying a load than a strain which has been bred for speed in harness or strength in draft, while the latter might as naturally excel the former in efficiency at the trot or in draft. Similarly, a race of horses developed in a hilly country might be expected to be more efficient in ascending a grade than one in- habiting a flat region. It would seem, too, that these differences may be not inconsiderable. The results cited suggest an interest- ing line of thought and investigation for the student of breeding. TRAINING AND Faticue.—It is a familiar experience that any unaccustomed form of work is much more fatiguing at first than it is later. This is due in part to the fact that in making unfamiliar motions more accessory groups of muscles are called into activity than are necessary later when more skill has been acquired. The experience of a learner on the bicycle is an excellent example of this. In the second place, however, simple exercise of a group of 520 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. muscles in a particular way seems to increase their average mechan- ical efficiency. Gruber,* in two series of experiments upon himself, obtained the following figures for the excretion of carbon dioxide during rest, horizontal locomotion, and hill climbing, all the trials being made about the same length of time (four to five hours) after the last meal: Work of Carbon Dioxide Ascent, Excreted in 20 Kgm. * Minutes, Grms. Series I: Restise es csieea ei seeess seed kaa seied a0 VR eo kee ves eas 9.706* Horizontal locomotion.............00cceleeseecccceeees 19.390* Hill climbing without ei siiciyius anata 5892 40.982 «« “after 12 days’ practice..... 6076 32.217 Series II (2 months later): TRESt sain: claves cca Rite yc ie ean a sal mentale aguas 12.833 Horizontal locomotion.................cfecceeeecceeeee 22.418 Hill climbing without practice.......... 7376 38 . 832f “~~ after 14 days’ practice.. 7539 31.001 * Some carbon dioxide may have escaped absorption. + Some carbon dioxide lost. Schnyder + has confirmed and extended Gruber’s results. In experiments in a treadmill upon two different subjects he ob- tained the following figures for the work performed per gram. of carbon dioxide excreted in excess of that given off during rest: : : Kem. No. 1 i Without training... 0.0.0.0... 000. c cee eee 218.13 AE tee eer ae After 2 months’ training.................... 253.18. ; Without training...............0..0 cc eee eee 243.93 INO: De teners ve sucteneuiis 1 After 6 days’ training..................000, 285.52 «65 BSF Cae ayada te ciusiavers Past arama 349.40 ‘ Without training..................000c eens 302.76: No. 2 (second series) } After 47 days’ training.................., :. 404.39 That the greater efficiency after training is not due solely to a diminished use of accessory muscles is shown by Schnyder’s experi- ments on convalescents. His results were as follows: * Zeit. f. Biol., 28, 466 } Ibid., 88, 289. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 521 Work per Gram, Car- bon Dioxide m,. No. 1—Climbing a hill pee trial) iis uierere 5 wise se 'eainiod io Hobe viewed 215.18 18 days later .......... cece eee e eee ees 306.18 Birsttelal 'ssiio- 4-s5 Ger oagine waaeen seme es 182.70 2 days after first trial................... 248 .34 10 “ ns BE NOE aah ga hati dela alee 253.74 No. 2—Treadmill....} 12 “ ne Ee as he cantatas 238 .85 14 “ “i RES SES [shea cvania areca anes 210.87 15“ : Be ERs eh sida a Wie Sede 227 .04 21 “ ie BE OTD ohae ts eet eerie crn bag 227.50 24 months after first trial................ 441.17 Piretitirial 4 .:¢:5i8lpiy a's avese’n sv stana.s 3. Sie vwdceng de 231.24 No. 3—Treadmill .... ) 2 days after first trial................0.00. 231.24 qe oi fhe ASS Faaahevanaleter ccalags a ae 286.25 In walking the same distance (468 M.) No. 1 excreted the following excess of carbon dioxide over the rest value: Miret trial. 62 2c23sesaeniork seen aes 4.505 grams Ao WEEK latef yi .csd: cee aie we-oueaw ee 3.690 “ A month later...... bei Sa rang aia 2.780 “ It appears from these results that the gradual strengthening of the muscles during convalescence results in a more economical per- formance of their work, largely independent of any special training for a particular kind of work. It seems a justifiable conclusion, therefore, that a part of the gain due to training arises from its direct effect in strengthening the muscles, as well as from the in- creased skill acquired in their use. Conversely, the effect of fatigue in increasing the relative metabolism, as shown by Loewy,* would seem to be in part a direct effect. Schnyder summarizes the matter in the statement that it is not the work itself, but the muscular effort required, which determines the amount of metabolism. In the case of domestic animals kept chiefly for work, however, we may safely assume that they are constantly in a state of training, and that the results obtained by Zuntz and his associates on the horse are applicable to work done by normal animals within the limits of the experimental conditions. * Arch. ges. Physiol., 49, 405. 522 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. RELATIVE VALUES oF Nutrients.—In the foregoing discussion it has been tacitly assumed that the stored-up energy of the pro- teids, fats, and carbohydrates of the body is all net available energy, ready to be utilized directly for the production of mechanical work. As we have seen, however, on previous pages, a school of physiolo- gists, of which Chauveau may stand as the representative, denies this, and holds that the fat in particular must be converted into a carbohydrate before it can become directly available. In discussing the source of muscular energy in Chapter VI it was shown that the recorded results as regards the nature of the material metabolized were insufficient to decide the question, since the final excretory products are qualitatively and quantitatively the same whether the fat is directly. metabolized in the muscle or undergoes a preliminary cleavage in the liver or elsewhere in the body. The results as to energy, however, would be materially different in the two cases. The dextrose resulting from the cleavage of fat, according to Chauveau’s schematic equation (p. 38), would contain but about 64 per cent. of the potential energy of the fat, the remainder being liberated as heat. We cannot, however, suppose that the energy of this dextrose can be utilized by the muscle any more completely than that of dextrose derived directly from the food. It follows, then, that the percentage utilization of the total energy metabolized during muscular work should be materially greater when the metabolized material consists largely or wholly of carbohydrates than when it consists chiefly of fat. By supplying food consisting largely of one or the other of these materials, it is possible to bring about these conditions, and a determination of the respiratory exchange and the nitrogen excretion will then afford a check upon the nature of the material metabolized and the means of computing the utilization of its potential energy. Investigations of this sort have been reported from Zuntz’s laboratory. The earliest of these were by Zuntz & Loeb * upon a dog, the method being substantially the same as that with which the preceding pages have made us familiar. Their final results for the energy metabolized per kilogram and meter traveled (including the work of ascent) were: * Arch. f. (Anat. u.) Physiol., 1894, p. 541. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 523 Diet. Respiratory | Energy, cals. Proteids:Onhy ies paisecs acrsrwedes vas Bes yselods 0.78 2.58 Chiefly faticon cs sus <2 mae auete cs eens moe es Ges 0.74 2.43 ce ““ (body freed from carbohydrates by phloridzin)... 1... cece eects 0.71 2.71 Much sugar with proteids .................... 0.83 2.58 « «and little proteids ................ 0.88 2.63 The differences are quite small, while, as Zuntz points out, if 2.6 cals. represent the demand for energy per unit of work when carbohydrates are the source it should, according to Chauveau’s theory, rise to about 3.68 cals. when the energy is derived exclu- sively from fat. Altogether similar results have been recently reported from Zuntz’s laboratory by Heineman,* and by Frentzel & Reach,} in experiments on man. In Heineman’s experiments the work, which was never exces- sive, consisted in turning an ergostat, the respiratory exchange being determined by means of the Zuntz apparatus and the total urinary nitrogen being also determined. From these data, reckon- ing 1 gram of urinary nitrogen equivalent to 6.064 liters of oxygen,t the average amount of energy metabolized on the vari- ous diets, and the proportion derived respectively from proteids, fats, and carbohydrates, is computed. By comparison with rest experiments the increments of oxygen and carbon dioxide due to the work were determined, and from these the energy consumed per kilogram-meter of work was calculated upon three different assumptions: first, that the proteid metabolism was not increased by the work; second, that it increased proportionally to the oxy- gen consumption; third, that as large a proportion of the energy for the work was furnished by the proteids as is consistent with the observed respiratory exchange. The results are summarized in the following table: * Arch. ges. Physiol., 88, 441. } Ibid., 88, 477. ¢ Zuntz, Arch. ges. Physiol., 68, 204. 524 | PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Ei K; Beooted ey net ork Respira- Predominant Nutrient. ie sa: |e | Be First | Segond | Third jient. 5 2 Cals, | drates,| teids, | sump- | sump- | sump Cals. : cals. cals. cals. a a...| 0.783 | 3829 | 1379 | 163,| 10.98 |....... 10.35 Met eeenees b....| 0.724 | 4422 } 2461 163° 9.39 | 0.85 | 9.27 0.805 | 3414 | 1823 | 139 | 11.15 |.......] 10. Carbohydrates. {her ‘| 0.901 | 1543 | 3374 | 139 | 10.67 | 10.63 | 10.37 As much proteids as possible........... 0.796 | 3381 | 1620 | 377 | 11.40 | 11.27 | 10.64 The subject was not able to consume even approximately enough proteids to supply the demands for energy, so that the experiments are virtually a comparison of the utilization of fat and carbohydrates in different proportions. With the exception of the third group, the results seem to show that the energy of the fat metabolized was utilized, if anything, rather more fully than that of the carbohydrates. Frentzel & Reach experimented upon themselves, the work being done by walking in.a tread-power; otherwise the methods were similar to those of Heineman. In computing the results of the experiments on a carbohydrate and a fat diet they assume that there was no increase in the proteid metabolism as a consequence of the work. For the experiments on a proteid diet they com- pute the results both on this assumption and also on the assump- tion of a maximum participation of the proteids in work produc- tion. Calculated in this way the total evolution of energy per kilo- gram weight and meter traveled was as given in the table on p. 525. The results show a slight advantage on the side of the carbo- hydrates, which in the case of Frentzel is regarded by the authors as exceeding the errors of experiment. They compute, however, that it is far too small to afford any support to Chauveau’s theory. Zuntz* has recalculated Heineman’s results, using slightly different data but reaching substantially the same result. He shows, however, that they are affected by the influence of train- ing already discussed on p. 519. Arranging the experiments in chronological order, it becomes evident that the work was done * Arch, ges. Physiol., 88, 557. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 525 ° Respiratory Energy per Kg. Quotient. and Meter, cals. Frentzel—fat diet: First week s¢ <.:0s'ss abess tessa Gos 0.766 2.088 Second week.................45- 0.778 2.049 AVETARE sicie) 5 sda d caters weno elas 0.773 2.066 Frentzel—carbohydrate diet: First: week ies asis:s 3 sews 9 hess 300 0.896 1.932 Second week...............0005 0.880 2.031 AVOTARC es Sinaia owas Aveeno ae 0.889 1.980 Frentzel—proteid diet: First assumption ............... 0.799 1.933 Second assumption.............. ' . 1.824 Reach—fat diet: Hirst -week.....o.css0s.ecsace snares 4 ciclo 5 0.805 2.259 Second week............0000000 0.766 2.034 AVETAPC ss io coca aenom sagt 0.781 2.119 Reach—carbohydrate diet: First week ............000e ce uee 0.899 2.202 Second week................0055 0.901 2.005 AV OETARC oosaasdia gues sv aiere vw apes 0.900 2.086 with increasing efficiency, largely independent of the food, and the fact that most of the experiments with fat came later in the series than those with carbohydrates largely, although perhaps not en- tirely, accounts for the observed difference in efficiency, while the low figure for proteids is accounted for by the fact that these were among the earliest experiments. A similar effect appears in the experiments of Frentzel & Reach, although it is less marked, since walking is a more accustomed form of work than turning a crank. On the whole, Zuntz concludes that these experiments warrant the conclusion that in work production the materials metabolized in the body replace each other in proportion to their heats of combus- tion—that is, in isodynamic and not isoglycosic proportions. THE UTILIZATION OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY. she investigations just discussed give us fairly full data as to the utilization of the stored-up energy of the body in the produc- tion of external work, and this, as we have seen (p. 497), is sub- stantially equivalent to a knowledge of the utilization of the net 526 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NU TRITION. available energy of the food. These determinations by Zuntz and his co-workers, however, do not bring the energy recovered as mechanical work into direct relation with the energy of the food; that is to say (aside from such computations of available energy as those made by Zuntz & Hagemann * for the food of the horse), they do not tell us how much of the energy contained in a given feeding-stuff we may expect to recover in the form of mechanical work, but only what proportion of the stored-up energy resulting from the use of this feeding-stuff is so recoverable. It is the former question rather than the latter, however, which is of direct and immediate interest to the feeder of working animals. The feeding-stuffs which he employs are comparable to the fuel of an engine, and the practical question is how much of the energy which he pays for in this form he can get back as useful work. Meruops oF DETERMINATION.—I wo general methods are open for the determination of the percentage utilization of the energy of the food. It is obvious that if we know the net availability of the energy (gross or metabolizable) of a given food material we can compute its percentage utilization in work production from the data of the foregoing paragraphs with a degree of accuracy depending upon that of the factors used. For example, if we know that the net available energy of a sample of oats is 60 per cent. of its gross energy, then if the oats are fed to a draft horse utilizing, according to Zuntz & Hagemann, 31.3 per cent. of the net available energy, it is obvious that the utilization of the gross energy of the oats is 60X0.313= 18.78 per cent. An entirely similar computation could of course be made of the percentage utilization of the metabolizable energy of the oats. Unfortunately, however, as we have already seen, our present knowledge of the net availability of the energy of feeding-stuffs and nutrients for different classes of animals is extremely defective, and extensive investigations in this direction are an essential first step in the determination of the percentage utilization of the energy of feeding-stuffs in work production by this method. Until trust- worthy data of this sort are supplied, results like those of Zuntz & Hagemann can be applied to practical conditions only on the basis * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. III, 279 and 429. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 527 of more or less uncertain estimates and assumptions regarding the expenditure of energy in digestion and assimilation such as those discussed in Chapter XI, § 3. The second possible general method for the determination of the percentage utilization of the energy of the food in work pro- duction is that employed in the determination of the utilization in tissue production. Having brought the animal into equilibrium as regards gain or loss of tissue and amount of work done with a suit- able basal ration, the material to be tested is added and the work increased until equilibrium is again reached. The increase in the work performed compared with the energy of the material added would then give the percentage utilization of the latter. The accurate execution of this method would require the em- ployment of a respiration apparatus or a respiration-calorimeter for the exact determination of the equilibrium between food and work, while the skill of the experimenter would doubtless be taxed in the endeavor to so adjust food and work as to secure either no gain or loss of tissue or equality of gain or loss in the two periods to be compared. Indeed, it may safely be said that exact equality would, as a matter of fact, be reached rarely and by accident, and that as a rule it would be necessary to correct the observed results for small differences in this respect. To make such corrections accurately, however, requires, as we have seen in § 1 of this chapter, a knowledge of the net availability and percentage utili- zation of the food, and we are thus brought back to the necessity for more accurate knowledge upon fundamental points. The extensive investigations of Atwater & Benedict * upon man appear to be the only ones yet upon record in which the actual balance of matter and energy during rest has been quantitatively compared with that during the performance of a measured amount of work. Unfortunately, however, the gains and losses of energy by the bodies of the subjects in these experiments were relatively considerable, while the experiments thus far reported seem to afford no sufficient data for computing the net availability of the food for maintenance or its percentage utilization for the production of gain. Moreover, the authors appear to regard the measurements * U.S. Department Agr., Office of Experiment Stations, Bull. 109; Mem- oirs Nat. Acad. Sci., 8, 231. 528 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. of the work done as not altogether satisfactory. In a preliminary paper * Atwater & Rosa compute a utilization of 21 per cent. Inasmuch as they have not further discussed the question of the utilization of the food energy for work production it would seem premature to attempt to do so here. It may be remarked, however, that the figures given seem to indicate a rather low degree of effi- ciency for the particular form of work investigated (riding a station- ary bicycle). Wolff's Investigations. The horse, being par excellence the working animal, has natu- rally been the subject of experiments upon the relation of food to work. While as yet the respiration apparatus or calorimeter has not been applied to the study of this phase of the subject, two ex- tensive and important series of investigations have been made upon the work horse, viz., by Wolff and his associates in Hohen- heim and by Grandeau, LeClerc, and. others ¢ in Paris, in which the attempt has been made to judge approximately of the equilibrium between food and work from the live weight and the urinary nitro- gen. Grandeau’s experiments were made for the Compagnie générale des Voitures in Paris, and were directed specifically toward a scientific investigation of the rations already in use by the company and to a study of the most suitable rations for the different kinds of ser- vice required of the horses. They were, therefore, while executed with the greatest care and exactness, largely “practical” in their aim. Wolff’s experiments were made at the Experiment Station at Hohenheim and were broader in their scope, being directed largely to a determination of the ratio of (digested) food to work. The following paragraphs are devoted chiefly to an outline of Wolff’s experiments, but with more or less reference also to Grandeau’s results. Methods.—In discussing the effects of muscular exertion on metabolism in Chapter VI, mention was made of the interesting * Phys. Rev., 9, 248; U.S. Dept. Agr., Office of Experiment Station, Bull. 98, p. 17. + L’alimentation du Cheval de Trait, Vols. I, II, ITI, and IV, and Annales de la Science Agronomique, 1892, I, p. 1; 1893, I, p. 1; and 1896, II, p. 113 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 529 results obtained by Kellner regarding the influence of excessive work upon the proteid metabolism of the horse. It was there shown that when the work was increased beyond a certain amount there resulted a prompt increase of the urinary nitrogen and at the same time a steady falling off in the live weight. The method employed in Wolff’s experiments, and which originated with Kellner, is based upon this fact. It may perhaps be best illustrated by one of Kellner’s earliest experiments,* in which starch was added to a basal ration, the results of which have already been referred to in Chapter VI (p. 199). In the first period the daily ration consisted of 6 kgs. of oats and 6 kgs. of hay, while in the second period 1 kg. of rice starch was added. Digestion trials showed that there was digested from these rations the following: Period I, Period II, Increase. Grms. Grms. Grms. Crude protein .............-260- 757 .07 750.53 — 6.54 pe DEL es. os see sega bees eee 636.10 713.40 + 77.30 Nitrogen-free extract ........... 3874 .36 4488 .15 +613.79 Ether extract ...........-..-065 279.45 275.43 — 4.02 5546 .98 6227 .51 +680 .53 The work was performed in a special sweep-power which was so constructed as to act as a dynamometer. With a uniform draft of 76 kgs., the daily work in the four subdivisions of the first period consisted of 300, 600, 500, and 400 revolutions respectively, while in the two subdivisions of the second period it was 800 and 600 respectively. From the daily results for live weight and urinary nitrogen and from a comparison with another period in which 1.5 kgs. of starch was fed, Kellner concludes that the maximum amounts of work which the animal could perform without causing an increase in its proteid metabolism and a decrease in its live weight were for the first period 500 revolutions and for the second period 700 revo- lutions. The difference of 200 revolutions, then, represents the additional work derived from the added starch. Two hundred revolutions with a draft of 76 kgs. equaled 438,712 kgm., to which’ is to be added the work of locomotion, estimated by Kellner (com- * Landw. Jahrb., 9, 670. 53° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. pare p. 539) at 100,000 kgm., making the total additional work 538,712 kgm. Kellner compares this difference with the increased amount of nitrogen-free extract digested, 613.79 grams, neglecting the small differences in the other nutrients. As corrected in a later publication,* the results are as follows: 613.79 germs. starch = 2527 .601 Cals. = 1,071,698 kgm. 538,712 + 1,071,698 = 50.27 per cent. If we base the calculation upon the difference in total organic matter digested, the percentage will of course be somewhat smaller. It was discovered later that the indications of the dynamometer used in these experiments and many subsequent ones were untrust- worthy, so that no value attaches to the percentage computed above, but it serves just as well to illustrate the method employed, and which was followed in the whole series of experiments. In brief, the attempt is to find in the indications of live weight and urinary nitrogen a partial substitute for the determination of the respira- tory products. As Kellner and Wolff do not fail to point out, the results are but approximations, and in any single experiment may vary considerably from the truth, but on the average of a large number of experiments it was hoped that satisfactory results might be reached. In later experiments rather more importance seems to be attached to the effects upon live weight than to those upon urinary nitrogen, but it should be noted that the live weight showed remarkably small variations from day to day, under the carefully regulated conditions of the experiments, and was quite sensitive to changes in the amount of work done. The experiments may be conveniently divided into three groups. The first of these | includes the years 1877 to 1886, inclusive, in which the work done was compared with the total digested food. The second { covers the experiments of 1886-1891, in which the digested crude fiber was omitted in computing the work-equivalent of the food, while the third group § includes the experiments of 1891-1894 with a new and more accurate form of dynamometer. * Wolff, Grundlagen, etc., p. 89. + Grundlagen fiir die rationelle Futterung des Pferdes, 1886, 66-155; Neue Beitriige, Landw. Jahrb., 16, Supp. III, 1-48. t Landw. Jahrb., 16, Supp. III, 49-131, and 24, 125-192. § Ibid., 24, 193-271. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 531 Experiments of 1877-1886.—During the years named, in-addi- tion to the preliminary investigations necessary in working out the method, a large number of experiments were made on three different animals. The rations consisted largely of hay and oats in some- what varied proportions, together with smaller amounts of other feeding-stuffs. In three experiments on starch and four on oats a comparison of the increase in digested nutrients * with the in- creased work which could be done gave the following results: + Increase in Digested] Nutrients, Increase in Work Done} Nutrients Equivalent at 76 Kg. Draft, to 100 Revolutions, Grms. Revolutions. Grms. Starch.......... 677.3 217 312 Oats se siecace marry 577.0 175 318 AVeraoGe kos -cile bovine st tert eh SE a] bee es Sag bees seule 315 THe MaInTENANCE REQUIREMENT.—AsS already stated, it was discovered later that the dynamometer used was unreliable and gave too high readings, so that the above result cannot be em- ployed to compute the utilization of the energy of the added food. It does, however, in its present form, enable us to compute the maintenance requirements of the horse by subtracting from the total digested food the nutrients equivalent to the work performed (ie., 3.15 grams the number of revolutions). The results of such a computation made by Wolff t are given on p. 532. The actual live weights in these experiments were somewhat below the normal weights, which were regarded as being about 533 kgs. for No. I, 500 kgs. for No. IT, and 475 kgs. for No. II. Wolff considers the maintenance requirements to be independent of minor changes in weight, and on the basis of the above “normal” weights computes the maintenance requirements per 500 kgs. live weight as follows: Hlorse Li... cece eee cece rene enone 4143 grams tO kc aakinge ous ecu a dea wean se 4260 “ UG Tiare daageeieron es vate se tones 4167“ Average... ..cscee rece tence eenee 4190 “ * The algebraic sum of the differences in the single nutrients is used, and in this and the succeeding comparisons the digested fat is multiplied by 2.44. + Loc. cit., pp. 125-129. t Loc cit., pp. 99 and 182. 532 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. ° ; Equiva- | _ For No. of | _ Total Nutriti Live | No. of t Mainte- Expert |Nutrients,| “Ratio. (Weight Revolt] wutrients,| ‘nance, Horsel....... 4 | 6805.6 | 1:5.79 |) 521] 600, 1890 4416 Horse II: 1881-82....]. 7 | 5881.1 | 1:6.64 | 477] 546 | 1720 4111 1882-83....; 4 | 6748.3 | 1:6.37 | 486 | 662 | 2085 4663 1883-84....) 6 | 5920.2 | 1:7.26 | 457] 567 | 1786 4134 Average...| 17 | 6078.4 | 1:6.80 | 473 | 577] 1818 4260 Horse III: 1881-82 6 | 5313.8) 1:7.16| 454) 404} 1273 4041 1882-83....| 6 | 6061.3 | 1:6.88 | 469] 683] 2152 3909 1883-84....] 5 | 5734.8] 1:7.55 | 473 | 580] 1827 3908 1885....... 4 | 5761.2) 1:7.57 | 473 | 575) 1811 3.50 Average...} 21 | 5717.8 | 1:7.29 | 467 | 5(1 | 1766 3952 By means of a comparison of the results by groups* Wolff shows that the maintenance requirement as thus computed is appar- ently independent of the amount of work done and of the nutritive ratio, and from this uniformity concludes that the relative efficiency of the food for work production is unaffected by these factors, within the range of his experiments. A series of similar experiments on Horse No. III in 1885-86,+ computed in substantially the same way, gave results-for the main- tenance ration agreeing well with those of earlier years, viz., Pernod 30 ote irae eee 3934 grams total nutrients Re UD e aos areas baad 3984 “ « i MO VW and. Voscocave ve cs 4001 “ *« ae NALD Sc wechetateadd au 4 4094 “ e ‘ amen C1 8 epee mtrenrereresetee ete eat 4094 “ & a Average ............0.. 4021 ‘“ se a with an average live weight of 475 kgs., equivalent to 4230 grams per 500 kgs. In a succeeding period (IX), however, in which hay alone was fed, a decidedly higher result was obtained,. viz., 4357 grams per head, or 4586 grams per 500 kgs. * Loc, cit., pp. 135 and 187. t Landw. Jahrb., 16, Supp. III, 32. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 533 Experiments of 1886-91.—In the experiments thus far de- scribed, with the exception of the last, the proportions of grain and coarse fodder in the rations were not widely different, the latter furnishing on the average fully one half of the dry matter fed. Consequently the experiments were not calculated to bring out any difference in the nutritive value of the two such as is indicated by the results of the one trial with hay alone. Grain vs. Coarse Fopper ror MainTenance.—The results obtained by Grandeau & LeClere upon the maintenance ration of the horse when fed a mixture containing about 75 per cent. of grain fully confirm the indications of Wolff’s trial with hay. Their experiments have been very fully discussed, and in part recalculated, by Wolff * in their bearing on this question. The three horses experimented on were fed two different amounts of the same mixture in several different thirty-day periods, eighteen such periods in all being available for comparison. In all of them the animals were led daily, at a walk, over a distance of about four kilometers. Wolff estimates the amount of work of locomotion by 2 amount of nutrients from the total digested obtains the amount re- quired for maintenance. The results are as follows: means of the formula 5(=) v* and by subtracting the equivalent Nutrients| For Maintenance. No. of Live Digested | Equiva- Experi- | Weight, | Nutrients,) lent to ments. Kgs. Grms. Work, Per | Per Grms. Head, | 500 Kgs., Grms. Grms. ier Ration : sea T. 2c 3 416.6 3553 110 3443 4132 Oe ANNs decane 5 405.9 3432 108 3324 4078 a 0 0 epee 4 439.0 3625 119 3506 3994 Average......|...-.-- 420.5 3537 112 3425 4068 y tion : ae 1 eaee 2 411.0 3060 108 2952 3636 e TIE sc 3.038 4 441.2 3310 119 3191 3617 Average. cpa alrite wa ks 426.1 3185 114 3071 3626 The results, and particularly those on the lighter ration, which appeared ample for maintenance, are much lower than those com- * Landw. Jahrb., 16, Supp. III, 73-81. 534 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. puted in the previous paragraph. The difference is too great to be ascribed to experimental errors in estimating the small amount of work done, and can most reasonably be ascribed to the difference in the character of the ration. Apparently the horse, like cattle (p. 433), requires less digestible food for maintenance when the latter consists largely of grain than when it is chiefly or wholly coarse fodder. Direct experiments by Wolff * likewise show that the digestible nutrients of concentrated feed (oats) are more valuable for work production than those of coarse feed (hay). The experiments were made in the manner already described, the draft being uni- formly 60 kgs. Although the measurements of the work actually done are probably incorrect, it may be assumed to have been substantially proportional to the number of revolutions of the dynamometer. A ration of 3 kgs. of hay and 5.5 kgs. of oats served as the basal ration, to which was added in one case 4 kgs. of hay and in another 14 kgs. of oats. The nutrients digested in each case and the equivalent amount of work secured were: Digested. ’ 55 ao] Ration. Nitrogen-| Ether Total Se 2 Protein, Fewie ree Ex- (Fat x | Se ® Grms. 1ber, | Extract, | tract, 2.4), oo Ay Grms. | “Grms. Grms. Grms ae I-III | 7 kgs. hay, ee kgs: oats| 822.58 | 816.68 | 3889.64 | 186.72 | 5973.62 750 Vi.) 3 “ 0 5.5 “ | 626.46 | 422.74 | 3068.46 | 184.78 | 4561.13 350 4 kgs. hay........... 196.12 | 393.94 | 821.18 1.94 | 1412.49 | 400 Per" 100 POVOUMIONS i. |4 ee neways dees ee e4e 04> akon bee 353.12 VI...) 3 kgs. hay, 7 kgs. oats...! 754.52 | 355.24 | 3719.24 | 252.17 | 5434.21 700 View [BP PERE “| 626.46 | 393.94 | 3068.46 | 184.78 | 4561.13 350 1.5 kgs. oats........ 128.06 |—67.50 | 650.78 | 67.39 | 873.08 | 350 Per 100 revolutions ..]........[........)ecc ccc ceufeeee eee 249.45 The relative value of the digested matter of hay and of oats for work production in these trials was thus approximately as 5 : 7. In the earlier experiments (p. 531) it was found that when oats or starch were added to a basal ration, approximately 315 grams of digested nutrients were required to produce the amount of work represented by 100 revolutions at 76 kgs. draft. Converting this result and the one just given for oats into kilogram-meters, Wolff computes that 100 grams of digested nutrients was equivalent, * Loc. cit., pp. 84-95. THE UTILIZ.ATION OF ENERGY. 535 in round numbers, to 85,400 kilogram-meters in the earlier experi- ments and to 90,480 in the one just cited. While these figures are not correct absolutely, they are probably comparable, being ob- tained with the same apparatus. In the later experiment the work of locomotion is computed by Wolff’s formula, which gives higher results than Kellner’s. Taking this into account we may regard the agreement of the two equivalents as satisfactory. VaLuE oF Crupe Frser.—In all the experiments with con- centrated feeds the additional nutrients digested from the added food contained no crude fiber, the apparent difference, indeed, being in most cases, as in the above experiment, negative. When hay was added, on the other hand, over one fourth of the addi- tional nutrients digested consisted of crude fiber. If, now, we neglect this crude fiber and compare the work and the fiber-free nutrients we have 1018.55+ 4.00 = 254.64 grams of fiber-free nutri- ents per 100 revolutions, or a figure corresponding almost exactly with that obtained for the fiber-free nutrients added in oats or starch. In other words, it would appear from this result that the digested crude fiber of hay is’ as valueless for work production as it appears to be for maintenance. If, however, the crude fiber is valueless both for maintenance and work, then by omitting it altogether from our computations we ought to get results for the maintenance ration and for the ratio of nutrients to work which are independent of the proportion of grain to coarse fodder in the ration. Confirmatory evidence of this sort is abundantly furnished by Wolff’s experiments and likewise by the results of Grandeau on maintenance. Taking first the averages of the experiments of 1877-1886 (p. 532) we have— Nutrients Digested. Fiber-free Nutrients No. of Equiva- for Maintenance. — domi’ “i nie ‘ ithout | tions a’ utrients, Total, Gude Crude 76 Kgs. Grms. | per Head, Per 500 i Fiber, Grms. Grms. Grms. Grms. Horse I..... 6306 815 5491 600 1890 3601 3378 «I 6078 978 5100 577 1818 3282 3282 an III 5718 809 4909 561 1766 143 3306 Average os e|nec eee |e sa necilecr sees eee Gees [ines we ae nee eae 3322 536 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. The results of the series made in 1885-86 on Horse No. III (p. 5382), computed in the same way, give the following as the amounts of fiber-free nutrients required for maintenance: Per 500 Kgs. Per Head, : . anne. , Live aoe ts Period L...........005 3270 )* 3442 OO LL etcstodaahn Seen 3186 3353 “Tid and V...... 3242 3413 ieee A 8 rerwerete een 3342 3549 OVAL: seie ca see 3316 3490 en ©. rere errr 3170 3335 Average...........5 3254 3430 From Grandeau’s experiments (p. 533), by the same method, we have for the lighter ration the following: Per 500 Kgs. Horse IT ............. 2732 3324 OA AT ce xe eas saes%s 2935 3328 Average Aisi sasdw sll Mae encee Leees 3326 Finally, for the series of experiments by Wolff, just discussed, upon the relative value of the digested matter of oats and of hay, and from which the conclusion as to the lack of value of the crude fiber was drawn, by computing backwards, we get figures for the fiber-free nutrients required for maintenance which not only agree with each other, as they necessarily must, but also with those of the earlier experiments. The results are: Per Head, Grms. Per on a lave Period I-III .......... 3175 3342 ef Lh eee eee 3275 3429 ee Viseede's asia ss 3180 3329 ae Wiles stews 3196 3364 Average siansadiapcctospcis, cud Siu fa cweete eaeaeuhaed 3366 THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 537 Wolff’s conclusions from these results * are— 1. The digested crude fiber is apparently valueless, both for maintenance and for work production. 2. The remaining nutrients may be regarded as of equal value whether derived from grain or coarse fodder. 3. The maintenance of a 500-kg. horse requires approximately 3350 grams per day of fiber-free nutrients. Wolff’s subsequent experiments up to 1891 ¢ gave results con- firmatory in general of the above conclusions. Particularly was this the case when the work of locomotion was computed by Kell- ner’s formula and not by the formula a(—)* The work done (expressed in number of revolutions of the dynamometer) per 100 grams of fiber-free nutrients was reasonably uniform and agreed well with the results previously obtained, while the fiber-free nutrients required for maintenance likewise agreed with the results given above. On the other hand, the inclusion of the digested crude fiber in the computations gave in many cases strikingly discordant results. In view of the unreliability of the measurement of the work no conclusions can be drawn as to the percentage utilization of the energy of. the food, and it seems unnecessary to describe the individual experiments. A discussion by Wolff t of the results of some of the experi- ments by Grandeau in which work was done, although rendered uncertain by the difficulty in estimating the work of locomotion at varying velocities, and by the changes in live weight of the animals, seems to indicate that they also confirm Wolff’s conclusions. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE Resu.tts.—In drawing his conclusions Wolff is careful to say that the digested crude fiber is apparently valueless, and while calling attention to Tappeiner’s then recent results on the fermentation of cellulose in the digestive tract as probably explaining its low nutritive value he points out that other ingredients of the food may also undergo fermentation. He therefore holds fast to the fact actually observed, viz., the lower nutritive value of the digested matter of coarse fodder compared * Loc. cit., p. 95. } Landw. Jahrb., 24, 125-192. t Ibid., 16, Supp. ITI, 110-126. 538 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. with that of grain, and virtually regards the amount of crude fiber as furnishing a convenient empirical measure of the difference. In the light of our present knowledge this reserve seems amply justified. The difference in the value of coarse fodder and grain we should now regard as arising largely from the difference in the amounts of energy consumed in digestion and assimilation. Kell- ner’s experiments on extracted straw discussed in the previous section have shown, however, that with cattle this difference is by no means determined by the simple presence of more or less crude fiber, but is related rather to the physical properties of the feeding-stuff, while Zuntz (see p. 392) has shown that the same factor largely affects the work of mastication in the horse. That the nutritive value of the rations in Wolff’s experiments was pro- portional to the amount of fiber-free nutrients which they contained, or, in other words, that the energy expended in digestion, etc., was proportional to the digested crude fiber, is explained by the limited variety of feeding-stuffs employed. The coarse fodder was meadow hay with, in some cases, an addition (usually relatively small) of straw, while the grain was commonly oats, part of which was in some instances replaced by maize, beans, barley, flaxseed, or oil-meal, while starch was added to the ration in. a number of trials. The larger part of the work of digestion, under these circumstances, was probably caused by the coarse fodders, viz., hay and straw, while the digested crude fiber was likewise derived chiefly or entirely from these substances. Such being the case, it follows that the loss of energy through digestive work would be in general proportional to the amount of crude fiber in the ration. The essential point in Wolff’s experiments is that the omission of crude fiber renders the results concordant, and this is as well explained in the manner just indicated as by the estimate of Zuntz & Hagemann that the work of digesting and assimilating crude fiber consumes the equivalent of its metabolizable energy. Experiments of 1891-94.—In the dynamometer employed by Wolff the resistance was produced by the friction of metallic sur- faces. A copy of his dynamometer was employed by Grandeau & LeClerce in their investigations at Paris, and these experimenters found* that the measurement of the work was subject to large errors, * Fourth Memoir, p. 49. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 539 particularly in experiments at a trot, owing to the continual changes in the friction. Wolff believes that in his experiments, all made at a rather slow walk, the errors are less, but admits that they are sufficient to deprive his computations of utilization of all valve. Grandeau & LeClerc, however, were successful in improving the dynamometer, by the addition of an integrating apparatus,* so that its measurements of the total work were satisfactory, and this apparatus was.added to Wolff’s dynamometer in 1891. Before that date, therefore, Wolff’s experiments, while of great value in many other respects, afford no trustworthy direct data as to the utili- zation of the energy of the food for work production, although, as we have just seen, they afford some information on subsidiary points. From 1891, however, we may regard the measurements of the work done on the dynamometer as reasonably accurate. Corrections. -— Unfortunately, in the light of subsequent investigation, the same is not true of some of the other factors entering into the comparison, particularly the work of locomotion and the metabolizable energy of the food. In all his later experiments Wolff computes the work of hori- zontal locomotion per second by means of the formula ; (Fw, in which W equals the weight of the animal, g the force of gravity, and v the velocity per second. Zuntz’s experiments, however, appear to show that this formula gives too high results, the error increasing with the velocity, and Wolff + himself recognizes the truth of this for higher speeds. According to Zuntz’s determinations (p. 512), Kellner’s method of computation gives results agree- ing quite closely with those computed from his respiration experi- ments. Under the conditions of Wolff’s experiments this corre- sponds quite closely to 50,000 kgm. per 100 revolutions of the dynamometer, and in the comparisons which follow this amount has been substituted for that computed by Wolff, thus reducing materially the figures for the total work performed. Wolff estimates the metabolizable energy of the food, on the basis of Rubner’s results, by multiplying the digested fat by 2.4, adding the remaining digested nutrients, and reckoning the total * Ann. Sci. Agron., 1881, I, 464. { Landw. Jahrb., 16, Supp. III, 119. 54° PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. at 4.1 Cals. per gram. As we have seen, however (Chapter X), this figure is probably too high for herbivora, although exact figures for the horse are not yet fully available. Approximately, however, we may estimate the metabolizable energy of the several digested nutrients as follows (p. 332): Proteins, cia savas eee 3.228 Cals per gram Crude fiber. .......... eee eee Beo23.0 ee oy ae Nitrogen-free extract.......... 4.185 “ “ << Ether extract............00055 8.572 “" « « Zuntz * estimates the metabolizable energy of the total nutri- ents (including fat X 2.4) at 3.96 Cals. per gram. This figure is probably somewhat high, especially for rations containing much crude fiber or ether extract, but may serve the purpose of approxi- mate calculations. EXPERIMENTS ON SINGLE FEEDING-sSTUFFS.—Comparatively few of the experiments admit of a direct computation of the utiliza- tion for a single feeding-stuff, since in most cases the amounts of two or more feeding-stuffs were varied simultaneously. As an example of the former class we may take Periods I and II of the experiments of 1892-93. In Period I the ration consisted of 7.5 kgs. of hay and 4 kgs. of oats per day, while in Period II the oats were increased to 5.5 kgs. The quantities of nutrients digested and the metabolizable energy of the difference between the two rations (computed by the use of the factors just given) were— . Crude Nitrogen- Ether Total Protein, = fi : Girma,” | Gar | xtract, | “meh | Nements Period IT....... 1022.4 849.6 4152.8 175.8 6446.6 PE NM kine ua es 847.8 . 819.9 3598 .4 137.1 5595.3 Difference .... 174.6 29.7 554.4 38.7 851.3 : Cals. Cals. Cals. Cals, Cals, Equiv. energy... 564 105 2320 332 3321 In Period I (20 days) the daily work consisted of 300 revolutions of the dynamometer. With this amount of work the live weight of the horse underwent very little change, but there was a material * Landw. Jahrb., 27, Supp. ITI, 418. THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 541 gain of nitrogen, so that Wolff estimates that the work might have been increased to 350 revolutions. In Period II (23 days) the daily work was increased to 450 revolutions and the same behavior was observed, while a further increase to 500 revolutions during the last ten days checked the gain of nitrogen without causing a decrease in live weight. Taking 350 and 500 revolutions respec- tively as representing the maximum amount of work that could be done on the two rations, the equivalent of the oats added may be computed as follows: Equivalent Revolutions. Work, Kem. Perigd: UT. cg e ia wtalg anise Cas taed euiding’y yeah eo Ae 500 1,030,687 OE cs Mataa's tials x hate Sc meer be Sioa Mote de tae haiioee 350 722,678 DifherenGe: 3.5 iss es ahsg vac e ea ek me ae 150 308,009 Work of locomotion for 150 revolutions.........)........... 75,000 Total difference is 2 scien sa des ee ctrsns Hedda wallaes waa ews 383,009 Equalt0; Jos negeases ds eee vaged es wae ee veld ea eee tea ee 903 Cals. The percentage utilization was therefore 903+ 3321 =27.2 per cent. The above figures serve to exemplify the general method of computation and likewise to illustrate the weak points in Wolff’s experiments, viz., the uncertainty in the determination of the work of locomotion and the impossibility of demonstrating the equilib- rium of food and work without the use of the respiration apparatus or calorimeter. Out of the whole number of experiments between 1891 and 1894, seven admit of a comparison of this sort, viz., four on oats, two on straw, and one on beans. Upon making the computations, how- ever, the results are found to be so exceedingly variable (the range for oats, e.g., being from 16.89 to 63.96 per cent.) as to demonstrate that the data of Wolff’s experiments are not sufficiently exact to be used in this way, and that the apparently reasonable result just computed is purely accidental. UTILIZATION OF FIBER-FREE NUTRIENTS.—But although Wolff’s results do not enable us to compute the percentage utilization of single feeding-stuffs, if we accept provisionally his conclusions re- garding the non-availability of the crude fiber they afford data for numerous computations of the uthization of the fiber-free nutrients, 542 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. and these computations in turn supply a check upon the hypoth- esis of the non-availability of crude fiber. Wolff makes the comparison by deducting from the total fiber- free nutrients 3300 grams per 500 kgs. live weight for maintenance and comparing the energy of the remainder with the amount of work done. In the following tabulation of his results this method has been pursued. For the energy of the fiber-free nutrients, Zuntz’s figure (3.96 Cals. per gram) has been used and the work of locomotion has been estimated at 50, 000 kgm. per 100 revolutions of the dynamometer (compare p. 539). diene Big utrients oa ; Minus 3300 | Work Done. | 2 § Period. Ration. Grms. ge Fal Grms.| Cals.| Kgm. | Cals.| 1891-92. : : TIe....] Hay, 7.0 kgs.; oats, 4.5 kgs.............. 1,424] 5,639] 931,676'2,197/38.95 Oo cre! Eby tor ds eonciap ait aibteaevets 18 1,990) 7,881)1,129 568) 2,663/33.79 a PP AERO! ORS cc apekaseses wie atic 2,259 Bi vise 1,094 ,328]2 ,581/28.86 Oa ed Pea Wakihidiw eS Sa seinwiletle 8 iidesarer's Sis, Seace snail, asst costs aie | BOs LO 1892. kgs.; ; oats, z 2 kgs.; eshesied cs ugh anes 1,775| 7,026]1,074,802/2,535/36 .07 straw, 1 kg....}| 1.873] 7.416]1,153,813|2,720/36 .68 “ grain, 5 O kgs. . 1.5 kgs.} 1,521) 6,023] 912,454!2,152/35.73 re 5.0 “ “1.5 “ | 1,860] 7,365/1,186 ,577/2,799/38) 00 “ oats,4.5 ‘ . see..] 1.90 537/1,188 ,388]2 ,803/37 .18 EH Bsecetenn od xqersi ee we a [aise asa exsiffstaceiy OO ie 1892-93. kgs.; oats, 4.0 kgs. Fs seed at elev iced 1,475] 5,841] 897,678/2,116'36.24 ce Dei ceva aise Mawes 2,297! 9,095/1,280,687 302433 20 ‘ Bee BB EE Oe sasautenegoisecey avs 1,670] 6.613] 905 ,568)/2,135/32.28 ie “5.5 ‘* ; straw, 1 kg...} 2,036] 8,063]1,167 ,127|/2,752/34.14 = eae (> aaa “1S ...) 2,577/10,210)1 421 ,285/3,352'32.85 . Gabe “2 kegs. .| 2, stool 10 0,660 shasta 3 oe 34.28 oR eC POC TEE eee OUT oe rary one ener y her Serer ee (83.74 1893-94. Teas Hay, 6.5 kgs.; oats. 4.0 kgs.; straw, 1. 0 ‘ke. 1,607) 6,362} 900,267|/2.122/33 .36 TI. ...2|) “3 0 * 7.0 2.5kgs.| 2,580}10,220/1 ,549,262/3,653/35.76 V......{| “ 3.0 ‘ grain,7.0 ‘ “2.5 ‘* .| 2,560/10.140!1 ,545,702/3,645:'35.95 WIe cass) “" 8.0 6.5. “2.5: .| 2,880 ae 1,673,786/3,948!34.61 ASOT ageless ccs aaikdis esate on dG, tes leet es ere sees [88:08 In every instance but one the utilization as thus computed exceeds 31.3 per cent. In other words, the energy of the body material which, according to Zuntz & Hagemann’s results, must have been metabolized to produce the amount of work done exceeds considerably the amount computed to be available from the food. There being no reason to question the substantial accuracy of Zuntz & Hagemann’s factor, this means, of course, that if the food and work were in equilibrium our estimates of the energy available from THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 543 the food are too low. Either 3300 grams of fiber-free nutrients (13,068 Cals.) is too large an allowance for maintenance, or the assumption that the energy of the digested crude fiber is substan- tially equivalent to the work of digestion and assimilation is erro- neous, or, finally, the figure of 3.96 Cals. per gram of digested nutri- ents is too small. As regards the latter possibility, while it may ‘be conceded that the energy per gram of digested matter will vary somewhat in different experiments, the difference will be too small to materially affect the result. The uncertainty regarding the maintenance requirement may be readily eliminated by a computa- tion based on the differences between the several periods, thus afford- ing, to a degree at least, a test of the correctness of Wolff’s hypothe- sis regarding the crude fiber. The following table contains the results of such comparisons. In each series the period with the least amount of digested food (fiber-free) has been compared with the other periods of the same series. ae eae Onergy 0: Work, Utilization, Nuciente Cals. Per Conk, Cals. 1891-92. Period III............... 20,949 2663 aad: | / Mpeg ae een 18,707 2197 2,242 466 20.79 Period IW sucsucsaeerss 22,013 2581 Pr Te ee 18.707 2197 3,306 384 11.62 en 20,094 2535 iod Ta-d...... cee eeees i eae fi oo 19,091 2152 1,003 383 38.19 ied Oise Beene 20,484 2720 Pee TD cemee wctnes 19,091 2152 1,393 568 40.77 fod ER sss taedeeess 20,433 2799 gn 19,091 2152 1,342 647. 48.21 544 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. Metabolisable nergy Oo: Work, Utilization, Seas Cals. Per Cent, Cals. 1892, Period V........+-.5e0e- 20,605 2803 CES TIT oc ciyiiep vais aeseesudiors 19,091 2152 1,514 651 43.00 1892-93. Period II.........eeee005 22,163 3024 « Tand IIL.......... 19,295 2126 2,868 898 31.31 Period IVb .............. 21,131 2752 “~~ TandTIl.......... 19,295 2126 1,836 626 34.10 Period V as escs i eee sie 23,278 3352 “Land Ds sisccs avs 19,295 2126 3,983 1226 30.78 Period Vic............66. 23,728 3655 « Tand ITl.......... 19,295 2126 4,433 1529 34.48 1893-94. Period Whss ccc eesans scars 23,288 3653 Oe Te anes careers yd 19,430 2122 3,858 1531 39.68 / Period V......0..eeeees 23,208 3645 EB RS TM arsenide waxstevnusis Seago 19,430 2122 3,778 1523 40.31 Period VI............... 24,488 3948 ear espe tne A 19,430 2122 \ 5,058 1826 36.10 Totals and averages, ex- cluding 1891-92...... 31,066 11,408 36.73 With the exception of the experiments of 1891-92, which were the first with the new form of dynamometer and which Wolff con- siders unsatisfactory, we have but two cases in which the apparent utilization does not exceed 31.3 per cent. Having eliminated the uncertainty as to the maintenance ration, and the figures for the energy of the food being regarded as substantially correct, this can THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 545 mean only one of two things, viz., that the figures for the work done are too high or that the deduction on account of the crude fiber is too great. That a determination of the equivalence of food and work by Wolff's method is subject to considerable uncertainty in an indi- vidual case is obvious, but there seems to be no apparent reason why it should be uniformly overestimated. The measurement of the work was made with great care, and while the work of locomo- tion is an estimate, its close agreement with the results of Zuntz & Hagemann (p. 539) renders it unlikely that it is seriously in error. It would appear, then, that with the rations used in these ex- periments the energy required for digestion and assimilation was less than the energy of the digested crude fiber. How much less it was, however, unfortunately does not appear, and we are obliged to content ourselves for the present with this negative conclusion. Zuntz & HaGEMANN’s CompuTaTions.—These investigators * have recalculated Wolfi’s results in a still different manner. In- stead of taking for the amount of work equivalent to the ration the figures given by Wolff, which, as already explained, are to a certain extent estimates, they take the amount of work actually performed in each case and correct for the observed gain or loss of live weight. This method is in conception more scientific than Wolfi’s, pro- vided the requisite correction can be accurately estimated. As the basis for such an estimate, Zuntz & Hagemann take an early experi- ment by Wolff,t from which they compute that one gram loss of live weight is equivalent to one half revolution of the dynamometer (at 76 kgs. draft). From the same experiment they compute the mechanical equivalent of one revolution as 2694 kgm. This, how- ever, aside from the fact that it is the result of a single series of experiments, was obtained with the old form of dynamometer, whose indications, as we have seen, were too high, but the later experiments unfortunately are not reported in a way to permit of an estimate of the difference. Taking the correction, then, as estimated, Zuntz & Hagemann divide Wolff’s experiments into two groups, viz., those in which the work was 400 or less revolutions and those in which it was more * Loc, cit., pp. 412-422. + Grundlagen, etc., p. 80. 546 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. than 400 revolutions. Comparing the averages of these two groups, they obtain the following: Total Loss of Nutronts,| Work, Kem. | weists, Grms. Grms. Heavier work (18 experiments)........... 6236 1,415,755 179.5 Lighter “ (13 ef ) Rae cee 5851 995,225 7.3 DETER CE: coins, aero ede ere naan 385 420,530 172.2 Correction for loss of weight...........-)........ 231,922 188,608 According to this computation, the 385 grams of added nutrients enabled 188,608 kgm. of work to be performed. At 3.96 Cals. per gram the metabolizable energy of the added nutrients equals 1524 Cals. From this, according to Zuntz & Hagemann, is to be de- ducted 9 per cent. for the work of digestion and also 2.65 Cals. for each gram of total crude fiber in the added food. On this basis we have the following: Weight, Energy, Grms. als. Digested nutrients.............. 385 1524 Average crude fiber fed: Heavier work ............... 2338 Lighter work...............08 2356 Difference................. —18 ! Equivalent-energy..........).....00085 ' —48 Work of digestion (1524 X 0.9)..|.......... | 187 Deductions jx escisae o eevee beamed lee seedy 89 Available energy...............[eccce eee 1 1485 Work done (188,608 + 424)......).......... | 445 The work done is 31 per cent. of the computed available energy of the food, a figure corresponding very closely with the 31.3 per cent. found by Zuntz & Hagemann. The difference in the average amount of crude fiber fed in the two groups of experiments is so small that the estimate for the THE UTILIZATION OF ENERGY. 547 energy required by its digestion hardly affects the computation. What the result appears to show is that the estimate of 9 per cent. for the digestion and assimilation of the fiber-free nutrients is approximately correct. The difference in the amount of digested crude fiber was some- what greater than that in the totalamount. If we make the com- parison of the two averages on the basis of the fiber-free nutrients in the same manner as in previous cases we have— Fiber-free nutrients: - Heavier WOM. 3 ssc dere eww weeos 5524 grams TAB bGE WCE coy vivee an oa wanen Ges 5086“ Difference.................0.004 438 “ Equivalent energy ................... 1735 Cals. Energy of work....... ...... Say a MER teoiet cs 445 “ Utilization... 0.0.00... ccc eee eee eee 25.65 per cent. Apparently a considerable amount of energy was required for the work of digestion and assimilation in addition to that equiva- lent to the digested crude fiber, a result which seems to conflict with the conclusions drawn from a discussion of the same experi- ments in the preceding paragraph. The apparent discrepancy lies in the determination of the amount of external work equivalent to the added nutrients. Wolff, as we have seen, after securing an approximate constancy of live weight, corrects the measured amount of work in accordance with his judgment of the amount which would have been equivalent to the ration given and relies on the ‘‘might of averages” to overcome the inherent uncertainties of his method. Zuntz & Hagemann, on the other hand, reckon with the measured amount of work, but are then compelled to correct their final result for the loss of live weight, and unfortunately this correction is relatively a very large one (over 50 per cent.) and rests upon a rather uncertain basis. While it would perhaps be pre- sumptuous to attempt to decide the relative value of the two methods and the probability of the divergent conclusions based on them, one can hardly avoid feeling that the trained judgment of the actual experimenter is a safer reliance than such a relatively large cor- rection computed by a critic. 548 PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION. In any case it is obvious that while the extensive researches of Zuntz and his associates afford very reliable data as to the ratio between the energy liberated in muscular work and the amount of external work accomplished, or, in other words, as to the utilization of the net available energy of the food, we have as yet, notwithstanding the vast amount of work done by Wolff and his co-laborers and others, but very fragmentary and uncertain data as to the utilization of the metabolizable energy of the food for work production. APPENDIX. TABLE I, METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF COARSE FODDERS. Organic Matter Energy of Metabolizable Eaten. Energy. 3 a P Feed Added. g is Urine Grm. il o 3 4 Food, Feces, Cor- |Methane,| Total, Or- S| a /sG] Cals. Cals. | rected),| Cals. Cals,’ [ganic s|z/| Si Cals. at- Cy OS lg ter, Ay |S Cals. F | 1 |9475/6024/44821.2 |16323.7 | 2113.3 | 3250.6 |23133.6 Meadow hay V4|% | 3 lGesolsizs/31327.8 | 9800.9 | 1530.0 | a5e0.7 liséae.9 Difference.... 2845/2849/13493.4 | 6724.5 | 583.3 | 689.9 | 5495.7 Correction... . +19.0 +5.9 +0.9 +1.5 | +10.7 13512.4 | 6730.4 | 584.2 | 691.4 | 5506.4 |1.933 Percentage ... 100.00 49.81 4.32 5.12 40.75 G | 2 |9405/5950/43811.3 |15336.3 | 1916.1 | 3432.1 |23126.8 Meadow hay V4 G | 3 |6651/3206|30750.7 | 9491.5 | 1359.6 , 2524.7 |17374.9 Difference... . 2754|2744|13060.6 | 5844.8 | 556.5 | 907.4 | 5751.9 Correction... . —45.4 | —-14.0] —2.0| -—3.7 |} —25.7 13015.2 | 5830.8 | 554.5 | 903.7 | 5726.2 12.087 Percentage... 100.00] 44.80 4.26 6.94] 44.00 H | 2 |9527/6323/45255.8 |14103.7 | 2576.3 | 3306.6 |25269.2 Meadow hayVI H | 4 |6402]3198/30338.1 | 8574.9 | 1795.0 | 2579.4 |17388.8 Difference... . 3125]3125|14917.7 | 5528.8 | 781.3 | 727.2 | 7880.4 Correction... . —8.9 —2.5 —0.5 —0.8 -5.1 14908.8 | 5526.3 | 780.8 | 726.4 | 7875.3 [2.520 Percentage... 100.00) 37.07 5.24 4.87| 52.82 vri|H| 7 |9743/6495|46275.0 |14104.8 | 2593.0 | 3564.2 /26013.0 Meadow hay H | 4 |6402/3198/30338.1 | 8574.9 | 1795.0 | 2579.4 |17388.8 Diff ee 3341|3297|15936.9 | 5529.9 | 798.0 | 984.8 | 8624.2 Cacrautione.. —208.3 | —58.9 | —12.3 | —17.7] 119.4 15728.6 | 5471.0 | 785.7 | 967.1 | 8504.8 |2.580 Percentage .. 100.00] 34.78 5.00 6.15! 54.07 549 55° APPENDIX. TABLE I (Continued). Organic Matter Energy of Metabolizable Eaten. Energy. [3 Feed Added. gle ea aad rine : dls cm) #| Food, | Feces, | (Cor- |Methane,| Total, Or- S| = |Se] Cals. Cals. | rected),| Cals. Cals. | ganic S| 3 oO Mat- E | 3 | Cals. M o OS lgq er, Al A le a J | 2 |9539/6340 45239.6 )13218.1 2755 .1 | 3620.2 |25646.2 Meadow hayVI {|} | Z |@e20/so39 s0548.8 | 8171.2 | 1954.6 | 2722.2 |17830.5 Difference... . 3081\3101'14691.1 | 5046.9 930.5 898.0 | 7815.7 Correction... . 101.8 | +27.2 6.1 9.1 59.4 14792.9 | 5074.1 936.6 907.1 | 7875.1 2.540 Percentage ... 100.00 34.30 6.33 6.13 53,24! F | 2 (9819/3170 46690.1 |18296.3 884.2 | 3239.9 |23269.7 Ost straw II..}/F | 3 (esol 0127-8 | 9599.2 | 1529:8 | 2500-7 |17038.1 Difference ... 3189 3170 15362 .3 | 8697.1 354.4 679.2 | 5631.6 Correction.... —94.3 | —28.9 —4.6 -7.7 | —53.1 > 15268.0 | 8668.2 349.8 671.5 | 5578.5 |1.760 Percentage... 100.00 56.77 2.29 4.40 36.54 41 G11 [9740/3115 45626.1 |17983.1 | 1633.6 | 3448.1 |22561.3 Ost straw II.. 4] @ | 3 [Ggar 0 30750.7 | 9491:5 | 1359.6 | 2524.7 |17374:9 Difference. ayes 3089 3115'14875.4 8491.6 274.0 923.4 | 5186.4 Correction... . +126.5 | +39.0] +5.6 | +10.4 | +71.5 15001.9 | 8530.6 279.6 933.8 | 5257.9 |1.688 Percentage... . 100.00 56.86 1.86 6.23 35.05 H] 1 /9611/3195 45570.1 |17751.7 | 2084.7 | 3792.4 |21941.3 Wheat straw I {| Ft] 4 [9G43}5495 soaee-1 | 574-9 | 1798.0 | 2579.4 |17888.8 Difference.... 3209/3195/15232.0 | 9176.8 289.7 | 1213.0 | 4552.5 Correction.... —76.6 | —21.7 —4.5 —6.5 | —43.9 15155.4 | 9155.1 285.2 | 1206.5 | 4508.6 |1 411 Percentage ... 100.00 60.41 1.8 7.96 29.75 J | 1 /9583/3188'45365.9 |16562.1 | 2237.8 | 4003.2 /22562.8 Wheat straw {/J | 4 (Gas 0'30548.5 | 8171.2 | 182476 | 2722.2 |17830.5 Difference... .. $125 3188)14817 -4 | 8390.9 413.2 | 1281.0 | 4732.3 Correction... . +302.4 | +80.9 | +18.1 | +26.9 |+176.5 15119.8 | 8471.8 431.3 | 1807.9 | 4908.8 |1.540 Percentage .. . 100.00 56.03 2.85 8.6 32.47) «+ Extracted rye { H | 5 |9114/2665/41900.7 | 9926.4 | 1756.5 | 4004.5 |26213.3 straw ..... H.| 4 |6402 0/30338.1 | 8574.9 | 1795.0 | 2579.4 |17388.8 Difference ... 2712'2665|11562.6 | 1351.5 | —38.5 | 1425.1 | 8824.5 | Correction ... —232.7 | —65.8 | —13.8 | —19.8 |—133.3 11329.9 | 1285.7 | —52.3 | 1405.3 | 8691.2 |3.261 Percentage... 100.00 11.35] -0.46, 12.40 76.71 Extracted rye { J | 5 |9142/2659'41962.6 | 9799.0 | 1705.8 | 4147.4 |26310.4 straw...... J | 4 |6458 030548 .5 | 8171.2 | 1824.6 | 2722.2 |17830.5 \ Difference.... 2684 2659 11414. 1 | 1627.8 |—118.8 | 1425.2 | 8479.9 Correction.... —113.3 | —30.3 —6.8 | —10.1 | —66.1 11300.8 | 1597.5 |—125.6 | 1415.1 | 8413.8 /3.164 Percentage ... 100.00) 14.14, —1.11 12.52) 74,45) APPENDIX. 551 TABLE II. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF BEET MOLASSES. Organic Apparent | Matter Energy of Metabolizable Eaten. Energy. 3 P 7 er Feed Added. g i exis Gram =| _.| © |] Food, |. Feces, (Cor- |Methane,| Total, re a|d| |S] Cals” | Cals.’ | rected),| Cals. | Cals.’ | S2nic g 2) a qo Cals Mat- a) 3/5/94 Fs ter, a) A] BR fe Cals. —_—_—_—— | | | | 1 ; F | 6 |8262/1702 37946.2 |11365.8 | 1786.1 | 2397.9 |22396.4 Beet mol ses I | ¥ | 3 |6630| 0 31327.8 | 9599.2 | 1530.0 | 2560.7 |17637.9 Difference... . 1632/1702) 6618.4 | 1766.6 | 256.1 |—162.8 | 4758.5 Correction... | ; +330.8 |+101.3 | +16.2 | +27.0 |+186.3 6949.2 | 1867.9 | 272.3 |—135.8 | 4944.8 |2.905 Percentage .. . 100.00| 26.87, 39:.2| —1.95! 71.16 ; H| 6 8110]1611/37544.4 | 9070.0 | 2035.2 | 3458.8 |22980.4 Beet mol’ses 1} | ff | § \6402| 0,30338.1 | 8574.9 | 1795.0 | 2579.4 |17388.8 Difference... . 1708|1611| 7206.3 | 495.1 | 240.2 | 879.4 | 5591.6 Correction... . —45914 |-12918 | —27.2 } —39.1 |—263.3 6746.9 | 365.3 | 213.0 | 840.3 | 5328.3 |3.308 Percentage .. . 100.00) 5.40) 3.16) 12.44) 79.00 j J | 6 |g104/1595 37461.1 | 9198.7 | 2017.2 | 3422.7 |22822.5 Beet mol’ses II } 5 | 4 6458] 0 30548.5 | 8171.2 | 1824.6 | 2722.2 |17830.5 Difference... 1646]1595| 6912.6 | 1027.5 | 192.6 | 700.5 | 4992.0 Correction... | —234.3 | —62.7 | —1410 | —20.9 |—136.7 6678.3 | 964.8] 178.6 | 679.6 | 4855.3 |3.044 Percentage... 100.00} 14.45} 2.67| 10.18) 72.70 552 APPENDIX: TABLE III. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF STARCH. KUHN’S EXPERIMENTS. Organic Apparent Matter Energy of Metabolizable Eaten. Energy. a g Per 3 Feed Added. Be Urine* bite a . | & |o 8] Food, | Feces, (Cor- |Methane,| Total, ani a a) 314 3 E) Cals. Cals.’ | rected),| Cals. Cals. fr ara E 5 3 3° ’ Cals. ter, a lel, Cals. Lol TIL] 2 18839|1651/40964.5 |16615.5 | 1430.3 | 3225.3 |19593.4 Starch I.... { IlI| 1 |7328] 0,34603.2 |15505.1 | 1549.6 | 2670.1 |14878.4 Diff ce... 1511/1651| 6361.3 ' 1110.4 | —119.3 655.2 | 4715.0 Comeniets +658.0 |+294.8 +29.5 | +50.8 282.9 7019.3 | 1405.2 —89.8 706.0 | 4997.9 |3.029: Percentage. 100.00 20.02 —1.29 10.06) 71.21 IV| 2 _|8787|1608/40725.6 |17202.1 1434.9 | 3348.0 |18740.6 Starch I .. 4 1V |1a@5/7074| 0/33405.1 |15250.6 | 1481.5 | 2491.3 |14181.7 Difference . 1713/1608] 7320.5 | 1951.5 —46.6 856.7 | 4558.9 Correction . —492.0 |—224.6 —21.8 | —36.7 |—208.9 6828.5 | 1726.9 —68.4 820.0 | 4850.0 |2.705 Percentage . 100.00 25.29) —1.01 12.01 63.71 Vv 2a |8767/1621|40827.5 |15804.1 | 1618.3 3021.1 |20384.0 Starch II... { vi 1 (7i99| 0/34211.5 |15312.2 | 1559.3 | 2268.5 |15071.5 Difference. . 1568]1621| 6616.0 491.9 59.0 752.6 | 5312.5 Correction. . +255.0 }+114.2 | +11.6 | +16.9 |+112.3 6871.0 606.1 70.6 769.5 | 5424.8 |3.347 Percentage . 100.00 8.82 1.03 11.20 78.95 Starch IL { Vv 2b 18792/1663/40917.4 |16270.0 | 1524.8 | 2941.0 |20181.6 aren’ V/V [1 [7199] = -0}34211.5 |15312.2 | 1559.3 | 2268.5 |15071.5 Difference. . 1593/1663] 6705.9 957.8 | —34.5 672.5 | 5110.1 Correction... +334.1 |+149.5 | 415.2 | +22.2 |+147.2 7040.0 | 1107.3 | —19.3 694.7 | 5257.3 |3.161 Percentage . 100.00 15.73| —0.27 9.86 74.68) Starch IT { VI| 26 |8861)1669}41245.9 |15485.9 | 1569.6 | 3130.5 |21059.9 “esQ1VIl 1) 17125 0/33855.4 |13765.2 | 1737.9 | 2480.6 |15871.7 Difference. . 1736/1669] 7390.5 | 1720.7 |—168.3 649.9 | 5188.2 Correction. . —320.9 |—130.5 | —16.5 | —23.5 |—150.4 7269.6 | 1590.2 |—184.8 626.4 | 5037.8 |3.018 Percentage . 100.00 22.491 —2.61 8.86 71.26 Starch 11... {| Vi] 3 |ooss|27ea|4sas9.6 [6001.4 | 1643.9 | 3807.8 |2az26.5 |, “e'V) VI} 1 17125 0/33855.4 )13765.2 | 1737.9 | 2489.6 ]15871.7 Difference. . 2828}2788)12004.2 | 2326.2 | —94.0 | 1417.2 | 8354.8 Correction .. —193.4 | —78.6 -9.9 | —14.2 | —90.7 11810.8 | 2247.6 |—103.9 | 1403.0 | 8264.1 |2.964 Percentage . 100.00 19.03] -0.88 11.87 69.98 * Computed from carbon content. APPENDIX. 553 TABLE IV. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF STARCH. KELLNER’S EXPERIMENTS. Organic Apparent Matter Energy of Metabolizable Eaten Energy. Feed Added. a | ¢ Per ae E Ze Urine crm d|3] O |S Food, | Feces, | (Cor- |Methane, Total, a q S| a las} Cals. Cals. | rected), als Cals. Stat, 4\2| 2 |e ae ter, Pa a Cais. Starch I and { B! 2 |11698/3231!52928.6 |15915.8 | 1740.1 | 3382.7 |31890.0 Th sxeopscocte B | 4 |10067/1607|/46129.1 |11874.4 | 1958.5 | 3716.3 |28579.9 Difference .. 1631|1624| 6799.5 | 4041.4 |—218.4 |—333.6 | 3310.1 Correction .. —30.9 —8.0 -1.3 —2.5 | —19.1 6768.6 | 4033.4 |-219.7 |—336.1 | 3291.0 |2.027 Percentage .. 100.00) 59.60) - —3.25| —4.97 48.62 Starch I and { c | 2 |11980/3193|54016.5 |19185.6 | 1723.7 | 3250.6 |29856.6 ay emavay G | 1 {10407]1602/47458.0 |15746.8 | 1785.7 | 3255.9 |26669.6 Difference *. . 1573|1591| 6558.5 | 3438.8 | —62.0 | -—5.3 | 3187.0 Correction . . +70.8 | 423.5 +2.7 +4.9 | +39.7 6629.3 | 3462.3 | —59.3 | -—0.4 | 3226.7 |2.028 Percentage -. 100.00] 52.22) —0.89| —0.01] 48.68 u { D | 2 |11636/1583/53902.2 |17817.9 | 2211.2 | 3381.4 |30491.7 Starch IT .. }/D | 1 | 9974] 0/46945.4 |15718.3 | 2407.0 | 2957.0 |25863.1 Difference .. 1662/1583] 6956.8 | 2099.6 |—195.8 | 424.4 | 4628.6 Correction .. —379.5 |—127.1 | —19.5 | —23.9 |- 209.0 6577.3 | 1972.5 |—215.3 | 400.5 | 4419.6 |2.792 Percentage .. 100.00} - 29.99] —3.27 -6.08 67.20 1... | E | 4 | 8374/1687/38608.3 |10833.9 | 1594.3 | 3382.7 )22797.4 Starch TIT .. 4] F | 3 | 6630] 0/31327.8 | 9599.2 | 1530.0 | 2560.7 |17637.9 Difference .. 1744|1687| 7280.5 | 1234.7 | 64.3 | 822.0 | 5159.5 Correction .. —268.3 | —82.5 | —13.2 | —22.0 |—150.6 7012.2 | 1152.2 51.1 | 800.0 | 5008.9 |2-969 Percentage ..| ,; 100.00) 16.42 0.73 11.41 71.44 G | 4 | 8380/1676/37963.6 |10497.1 | 1394.7 | 3170.5 |22901.3 Starch ITI .. { G|3 | 6651] 0/30750.7 | 9491.5 | 1359.6 | 2524.7 /17374.9 i ~ 1729|1676| 7212.9 | 1005.6 35.1 | 645.8 | 5526.4 Comoe. 246.2 | —76.0 | —10.9 | —20:2 |—139:1 6966.7 | 929.6 24.2 | 625.6 | 5387.3 [3.214 Percentage .. 100.00, 13.35/ 0.35} °8.98] 77.32 | H| 3 | 8373/2013/38562.4 | 9843.8 | 1588.4 | 3183.9 23046 .3 Starch IV... 7] H| 4 | 6402} 0/30338.1 | 8574.9 | 1795.0 | 2579.4 |17388.8 iff af 1971/2013] 8224.3 | 1268.9 |—206.6 | 604.5 | 6557.5 oe tion oe +193.2 | +54.6 | +11.4 | +16.4 |+110.8 8417.5 | 1323.5 |—195.2 | 620.9 | 6668.3 [3-313 Percentage .. 100.00) 15.72} —2.32 7.38 79.22 J | 3 | 9004/1600)36982.6 | 9096.8 | 1885.4 | 3492.1 /22508.3 Starch IV... { J | 4 | 6458] 0)30548.5 | 8171.2 | 1824.6 | 2722.2 |17830.5 iff is 1546|1600| 6434.1 | 925.6 60.8 | 769.9 | 4677.8 eae +254.1 | +68.0 | 415.2 | +22.6 |+148.3 6688.2 | 993.6 76.0 | 792.5 | 4826.1 |3.017 Percentage .. 100.00! 14.85. 1.14 11.85! 72.16 554 APPENDIX. TABLE V. METABOLIZABLE ENERGY OF WHEAT GLUTEN. , Apparent Me Energy of Metabolizable Eaten. : Energy. Feed Added ¢ | 6 Per 7 7 5 -L36 d, | F (Cons [Meth: a. |<] | F 698‘OT | Z'F9L‘eT | 9 eres | O'sss | I a Wipe Ae ‘key + woes peseg ‘4 hoy moppayy “BEOOXY, ; Bie) S(B) ; “sTBO SY “sayy jo u0rty” | ‘(paqyaer10g) ‘goueuey ‘eoueue} ‘ABOU “quZTOM -porag |-peumy! e211): urer) jo “Ue! 1249 Urey erqezty ArT ‘ eseyueoleg| Agieuq ss00xq peyndu0y “ogee esuI0Ay : ‘A Wav 8°8e aac ed 9°81g°¢ 9° 82g°¢ en eee es : . os er “g0uarayIq. Ter | 2°910'% | $229 | G-o96'%T | 6'2E9'ZT | S969 | & i EES ES AOEE: FSET SSL | _0°992‘0T ; G6IIt | GS 9LE+ srteeessss sau Sram BAT] LOJ WOTQDALIOD . 9'6S90'F | $°6L66 G 9I1B'8% 6° 2o— T'§s— L'eg— “tres J99q98UL OUBSIO IO} WOT{EIIOD ¢2s0'r | 9°ce0‘Or | o'zEez%‘er | 9°692'Es | 2°S19 z a voresess ses ssc meas + UOTyeL Teseg “TT NDA 72O 8° FE 6 LEL‘S TGL8L T'Glg‘'z . ee rrrreseseeess gomaragiq. weg | 909% | Sors'r | 2 Ers‘eT | G:OEs'ZT | T's€9 P c crreteessescecscscsss ““TOrped TESeg 9° 866F | 6 I6L'ST_ & 6h 8° 86— TrrrsesssauSTaM OAT] IO} WOTJOIION x L:260'S | 2°98¢'2T_ 9° s0L'Sz S T1é+ b 6+ - F 6S+ "+++ ++ r9q98UI OTUBSIO IO} TOT}99LI09 a 9910'S | 8:92'ZT | 6'GTF'ST | Z:9F9'GS | $°8Z9 z r trtreessecese ss“ Seu + UOTyed [eSeg & SIA hoy mopvayy XN PSP 6°11 8° F0S‘S 3° F0G'8 prrreeeeessesresesees sagmaraId 68g | zg00'% | 2 66e's | T'686°ET | 8°88E'ZT | 6899 | F H pe Se eS eee (Ser T'stt'9__|_¢° F06'TT fo opet g°0@6+ trrttsts ++ qUSTaM BAT] JOF WOTYIITIO| 6325'S _|_0°F860T 9° £68'Sz £'0Z-- PF 61I— ¥ 61I- ‘tothe 1gqqBUl OTUBBIO IO} WOTDIIIOD zero'g | FP S0L‘IT | 9°606'FT | O'S10'92 | O'9eL | Z H soreeresccecess Key + woryed [seg [TA foxy nopvay “ssa0xq, 5180) “sTeQ “SIO “sTeO “"s3y jo uot} | ‘(pazoer109) ‘g0uBua4 ‘goueusy ‘ABOUT ‘qqsI0oM |. -B2 ule) jo -Uley J2EAQ -uley 9[qezi] aATT porsg | euiuy asequeoieg| AsrI0uq sseox pemduioy -0qeye ase10Ay ‘(panuyuog) WA WIV as roel 8 808% : 8° 806'F spive iP at Sndgenh toy can arses ba Basa By Ses aouerayiq : “O1e'F L°81S‘e. Ge < con 2 « iF ae [Sea ee area ee ee eo see 800s, || 8 SIE ogs‘zT | rge9 | F f woryes [esBg 6 OST _— 0 * S8S— REED ARR oe B 6-068 9-e19°6 acauilee qUBIOM OAI[ 10J U0T}IeII0D : ¢ Olt + G@ouIt | fo ft Io}YBU O1UBSIO 10} UOTIOALIO, rsere | rzee'e | L-sez‘er | s'zos'ee | 619 | 1 Pr eee * AveI]S + aoa Teer “| NDLy 79M 8°01 G28) 9° 808" : 9°30¢‘F ccc ret ee | Pe ee ee souls FIG 6 g¢ cee 4 See L686 eL 8° S8EZ1 6899 7 H peewee oe eae stew ee ** UOIyed yeseq 2°98T—- 0° Z18—- Pe ee Fi x r ; 10% €422's erie qyZIoM OAT] JO} WOT}aLI0_ GB— 6 eh— 6° 8h— tereeee ss raqqgul OTUBSIO IOF WOTZIeLI 3 e'20L'% | 26988 | I 2z9'eT | ge 1F6'I2 | e'9r9 | 1 | ere nee es meiys + UOLyeI TeeeEy & o] MDlgy way M a eS : aut 6 ae ; eee: pei IN|, | Ree eeteiee oom “g0UeI0 PIC r'8S0F G' 128 eT “PLe : Bees 0-98¢'2 e1186 6 PLE LT | 9° T29 € £3) WOryel Teseg, 9 LE— 6°29-— wines ea wate oe we F oc clos prseoter qyZIem eAT] JOJ WOTDaLI0D : CG tL+ G'ygae i, ek | | Aa vee 19}}8UI OTUeZIO 1OJ WOT}IOII eres’e | 2°208°6 | 9'sez'er | e 199°e% | z°219 if EVA Ree RPE Ne “savers + uoryer rece “JJ 10g O °8899: i % ” . . Je-008 “(poieaitog) ; ‘eon ieonscal “Aa one ‘atk Set U -u = “poried |* cima] Sug | “ban? | pomauog | often | omthy | | 3 w ‘(panuyuog) IIA TIAL 559 APPENDIX, g'8g 9° 868'Z 8 FGF 8 ThE Fr ed soudrTEHICL Teh | 2910'S | 7'LL9'% | $°096SI | 6 LE9'LZT | S 96g & C (ceases a Cabaae as ee uoryer [eseg, €' O16 F 3696 Zz 69e+ g-9s8+ Sw wee we ewe qqsIom aATT IO} UWOT}O9110/) List |_2'992'8 L@89°CS €°08+ €'98T+ / GOOSEN Ree “"19}}VUL OTUBBIO 1OJ UOTIIIIIOD 8° 09F F PF 6L98 O' LIST | F'968'%2 | 9° 999 9 aa | Uxtepeoa, EY Sosse[OUL + UOl{eI [Ese ¢ Sasspjoyy 729g 9°s¢ | 8°6z6'F 8 S1F8 gers | | | feesees ahs epanGuaas eheauent esau aoussayIq pes | 909% | SB 9IS'e | L°eIS‘eT | Goss‘zT | I'se9 | + c eT S CRA Cn uoryer yeseg, b'06T 4 9082 ZI Pp L03+ DeG6C We ee IE Diag | TREES AEC **"QySIOM BAIT IO} WOT}DIIIO; ‘ cant “ tes -uor @) 0° 86.9 6 FEE Cr &" PPS 9G 9 7e— T “99— ; T 99— phslaeinnae! 19}78U o1Ue3IO Io} U0I}99I1109 9° L10°L | O'TOF‘ZT | ¥'606'ET | F'OTE‘9% | 2° E99 g LE ee dind meays + uonel peseg SDL pIIVLLY e729 | ssrs‘e | 2169's Z' 169'8 : : +++ -goueregiqy 68g | z'e00'% | 2 66e'e | T'686'ET | 8'sse'ZT | 6899 | + H : Re Ales uoryer peseg 0' 678 LZ 6 060 GT b 6FS+ b Sept | | re ** *qUSIOM @ATT JO} W0T{9eII09 9° 669 2 ¢ 199 II 0° 080 96 $°8L— €' eel — Mg eet pada tacky **19q9BUI OTUBBIO 10J WOTPIIIION - T8L29 2 S'OOS TI | G Clr FI | S'E1S9% | S669 ¢ BER ie 5 dind meiys + uoryer Teseg *MDLIg papvijc gy ‘ssooxq | “SIED Reis) 8180 Le) 83x jo uoly (pezer10g) goueue} eoued AZi00gq “qq3to MM -poreg |*peurt ez) urer) jo -UlB{ 120A -oy Urey 91qezT] @ArT : ey esequeoieg| ABIaUq BSOOxG payndurog -oqeyeyy =| e8eiaay ‘(panuyuop) IIA A@1IaVL APPENDIX. 560 ‘L'OOF'FI [SULsIO Uy oP L°81e'‘t S'ZI6Z ¢°Z16S PTT € SHA eC Eee e 4 Sik * AGO TeTeTTICT . . 7 . "2 aAAtA. ¢ SP als eooe 3° eze'sT P2696. 2°69 Z Ill eee ane . TAREE OATHS Fe TOT BT yeseq. 0 '99T ae 9° She+ ee ee qYZIaM VAI[ JOT WOTYeL104 T'280°F_|_ ¢'s¢g9'8 6° S0S‘SS 2 911 a S'OFZ + Gor+ | | fo [rttrttot 19}} BUI OTMTVSIO IOJ WOI}D9LI09 60268 ‘| 08688 | F'L98‘eT | 7 G9z%'ee | zFZ9 | & LE [oe re "eqns + woryer gsc Wainy way, z'og | Tt “684% | e°998'F e'9c8'F * souaTeyid bag ? a4 o orky Lsig‘el | Soss‘Zt | 1°S89 Re Terese sees s moar [ese 9 eze+ ca ; gS Soar ‘' + aU BIO BAT] IO} WOTV9LIO“D, T'928'F | 9° $99°8 8° 989'S% 9° IL— 2°981-— 2° 981-— trrrtress+1999BUT OTUBZIO IOJ WOTISLIO“/ LLbV> | $1698 lat TET‘bI | G ezs'%s | 1629 9 i [ross Sesse[OUl + UOTBI [ese ¢ sassnjo yy 720g Pes G'ODFF €°8ze'¢ 2°8ze'C es eee e ae eee eee soualagIC 6°8¢ G: 800% 2 968g L' 68681 3° 88821 6° 899 a H 6a a Ge hb a ew ae we e6 eae Bee *MOI}ed reseq . ‘S2L'8 g'sre+ | 6° 16S+ eee | (A | cial FAIA. SAT] OF WORDAIIOD T'10T9 T'98T 8 L'LTL 3G T ‘Sot — £°896— Seqg— fb i OR Res * 19}JBUI OTUVZIO IO} WOTJDIALIO|N 69969 F668 8 O'18S'FT | F°086'%% | STIL 9 De) ie aCe eee SasselOUL + UOl}eL [ese 2 sassnjo yy 720g a woe ice Jagretod qoute yee aren oot | HED JO | -ureW sea | -osure_ aqqezt eary | Pobed | Tsanay queoIeg| Asie ssooxq peynduioy -0qeyeyL OBBIVAY ‘(panuyuog) IIA WIaVL 561 APPENDIX. 6'9E 0° 9¢9‘T 0 est F 0° &3tF PEM Rae Leg thee seta Pes SoTeTenTCy oo | 2992'S 0'9F9'OT | 6 S86'ZT | 6° 6L9°8% | E7229 v (on) EES ESL SEES OOVOL TESCT, L1eF'L | 0° 621'ST T'3e9— € 99L'T— rrssssres ss sau Btam BATT LOT WOTDaLIOZ 8 gS0'8 . | §°S6z‘9T 6290'S | * 8° L6T— L°S86— L°S8o-— srrrsstss91999BUT OTUBSIO IOF WOIJIIION 9'Isl'S | O'TeS‘9T | 9° 2Z9Z‘9T | 9°86%'8E | 8° 2409 I q@ fcr cts uagnys + vores peseg SUaInyy wey Zo Ss 2 12a L' SPo'e L'SPo'e os ares presser ses reece s ess s gguaIanig T6r | LTT | 8 2848 €'eGz‘eT -| 9'OFL‘ST | 0° 189 z AT [UCU cored Teseg F'Sese F'SELL PF Ort o 1S+ tetress sess sag BI9M VATT LOJ WOTDIIIO|D oezse | S 1TT's 1’ 988'8% 8 0aT— 0°96 F 09% — seresees ss Tgqqagur OTUBSIO IOF WOTJIAIIO| 8° 8F6€ ZLGEL .| GS PLEST | L TE9SS | E°SE9 g AI [CCU ueqnys + uores Teseg “UaInyD 194M 08h | 66992 _| g'TEE’s 9" 1ee¢ Lette e eee eee ee neon s segguaxagICT © SF F Pe6S 9°690'9 8° 8ze'et ¥ £6C'61L 8° 6F9 Zz TIt Taree Seek Basile Fie aee ea oe TART TRSRE 2 r6r's |Z 1OFIT O'L0E+ | 9 989+ vesssese sss s-auFtamM QATT JOT WOMDILIO[ e2st'g | 9°992‘0T _0°S26FS_| 4 9° 68— 6° 18— p 6 18— veers sss ss raqqBul oTUeSIO 10} WOTJDIIIOD 6936S G°LPSOL | F' 6ST FT | 6°9009% | 9°S69 y TI | ueynys + uored peseg 5 UaINgy wey M “8800xq] Rize) a) Bie) sey) | 88 jo 1013 | ‘(pazoer109) ‘g0ueu94 ‘gousu ‘ABI90 *qu3I0M |. i ez) Ulery jo -UTeW 1940 -o] UBL aTqeziy oary polleg | [eurrmy esezue01eg| AdI0Uy SSOOxXa peyndu0y -oqey~hW edB10AVy 2 “(panuyuop) IIA TIAVL APPENDIX, 562 ‘p OSF'ST [eutsuo uy e'2e P'ZE'S a 0°STZ'¢ a O'81Z'S ee eee ee aoueragiq. 6G | S'1zg'9 | Z'O99'TT | 6 ZOSFI | T's98'sz | e489 | T Giger EPI EE ED 6°8S9'8 ELE LT 8 . 498+ g . Pes‘ + ee D eee qUsIOM aAll Oj 01}09L10) 1'962°L __| 6° 88‘CT T929‘Te L' L86— L41S— F L bIg— sreeeeee ss igaaeUr OTUBZIO IO} UOTJDALION 8°€808 9° SSE'OE |xe LEL‘ST | 8°060'%E | T°862 4 CUE 1) pie *uoeynys + UOryed feseg “ UaInyy may M oer | 0° £09'% ¢°Z80'9 ¢°Z80'9 soueroBIT 143 : : ea {sop et ¢'290‘ET | 9°699'9% | 6°€09 | T fe) uolyer [ese : “P89 61 S6sht+ | 8 hOGF fo fo fii ns qyBIem VAT] IOJ WOTYIeLI0Z_, T'2LF'6 | 8° 662'8T _T'20L'S8 | Tset— a T&s— ; GS 18s-— sr fresesssTaqqeul OTUBBIO IOJ UOTJIELION 2696 O'I96'ST | E°SLEET | GE e6'%E | 2°299 & Or pees. ee ek “wens + woryed Teseg “ UaIny) YOY M 1° 6h 8°882'S P 20¢°¢ € 209°C ae news treeeeesees + omar: ZS 2994/9 0" oFa(or 6° 88621 6 6LE'8Z 2°29 F a ease ereee treeeeeess goMnel [eseg &° LOT — eo) Se "++ **qqZIOM BAT] JO} WOTDILION 8'119'8_|_¢"19e‘9T _2°280'F8 | O1s+ 188+ L°8e+ stresses s*r9qqBUT OUBBIO IO} WOTYI1I0/ 8'06S'8 | 9°ZIS‘OT | O'9EL‘ZT | O°8F0'FE | Z 199 | & i [ES a ese oe “wayne + uoHel peseg ‘ “ UaMyD Way M “s890xqT “sye9 “STB “STB “sTBO “S37 | jo uot | ‘(paz0eLI09) ‘goueue} ‘eousa ‘ABOU ‘qqzteM |. " e200, urey jo | -ureyseaQ | -o7uTeyy a1qezI] eary | | POHed | Teuy, esezueoleg; AZ100q SSeOxXGT peyndurcg -0qeyey esel0Ay | ‘(panuyuo)) IA ATAVL & “juao Jed gF aq 0} pauInsse uorzed [eSB JO UOL}BZI[L}() % wm ges | 0° 488° | 8 Fars 8° bar's PORT PS BSG : ERG AINE 24 Hie souarayiq 6 IP 8 PUr'T €'968'e Z'S29'IL | ¢°T20°ST | 1°Z09 T A SR ee ver nile wa “doryer yeseg £808 F T1288 0° 26+ S$ 180+ ; eee eee ‘+++ -qu Bram OAT] OF WOIyDaLI0N €or 9° 6898 £°96F 0G TLe+ € Slit ; Sart "set" 7999BUI DTUBSIO JO} WOTIDIIION G POL ELL 8 L906 TL | O'P8EOS | T°0Z9 DZ A pee Seay & yoreys + uolyer [eseg < YoLD1g 0'0SeF eee ee oe D1) Ch CG | o 6h | € 686— £' 6e6— O'IZI‘ST | L°18L‘FT | 8°229 at A eat re eoee te yee uor}er Teseg : 8°849T LO1F € x #6 99+ e eert hes SDE eRe ***qq 31am VAT] JO} WOTOALIOD Q 6129 T F'8L6 € 2° Té¢ 8T & +8 68— 6 802— ; 6° 806— stresses **1999gUT OTUBZIO IOJ WOT}DIIOD Py L TILT € L87E E'eseSt | 9 OFLA ST | O° 189 z AD re “yoreys + UOlye [eSeg XN * pli o'0¢g | 0°009'% | 6 266% 6 L66'F FOES yachts aouaragICT SOF | Z'9F9, S'P6S'T | 6 E8S'ET | F'SL8'FT | 1°ZE9 T Wr |" cea uolyer peseg o OFT ES 26g 9 a L6+ 6683+ : sees ne eae **qyStom aAl] IO} m01}981I09 0'6F0 € G'oSé9 §'928'6T OFT + 6° B83+ ; 6283+ "tots ++ 1999BUI OTUVBIO 10} WOTVILIOD Fb b86S 9°690°9 8°Seo sl | F S69 61 | &'6F9 4 Ill |°"°°*" ti cae “yoreys + UOlel [eseg © you “s890Kq “sTBQ * “TBO “sTBO G28) "333 jo uot} *(pazoeL109) ‘g0uBue} ‘goueu ‘ABI90 ‘qq3I9aM |. 3 “ez, urery jo -urey 10AQ | -aqurey a1qezty aarp — | POMed | Temrty) e8eyuooleg| AZIeuq ssooxq] peynduiop ogee | esei0Ay *‘(panuyuog) IIA WIdVL I . SF g . 4rd 8 . 2180'S 8280'S wee enews Pa ee Se a souareyiq 668 | F:989'T | SOOT | HTLLTI | 2° TL8°ST | 0° FF9 Dai ers ae eee eed, L'690°F__|_1°881'6 0° 6FT + pelet trresecress s-auaamM BATT IO} UWOTZALION L016 | 2°F92'8 &° 606‘0Z 0'09— b'0ST— F'OST— srreeees es y99qgUr OTUBZIO IO} WOTJDILIOD 20268 | T°ST6‘S | 8°FHT'SL | 6'690'T% | 6° P29 % TA. crores Gores + wolyer Teseg ¢ yong! 2°8¢ 6'F23'S “e' 19z'e @°1¢%'¢ rere eee ee er **** gouerlegicy 61h | S Perr | eges'e | Se29'IT | g T20'ST | 1°Z09 Ep ae eee ne OSS TSE G'6FS PF __|_9°899'8 sé 80st | 8° b8h+ PR RAG on RE A 4YSIOM BAT] OF WOr}DeLIOZ rs T'9F0'F | _8°891'8 8° 8z8'0% z L T9+ @ LPL at 2 LbI+ sreseres ss 1999RUI DTEBZIO IOJ WOT{I1I0D a -F'P86E | 9120'S | O'O9T‘ZT | 9° T8T‘O% | 0°09 % Be Sees “os **Yoreys + TONCL [eseg & . Yong Leo | 9°668¢ | 9'299°6 | g¢' 199'6 ; ters aouaregig 61h | 8 Per'T | S968's | SSL9'IT | G IZO'ST | 1°Z09 T Ye | en Trreese sss Toner [eseg 6'Eee'L | 8° SS0'ST gcee+ 8008+ crrteresss sq B1aM BAT] JO} WOIWDEIIOD r 886 9 0° 267 ral 0° OLF ZI [o° 622'F2l I *¢99 ¢ A sete eens eee eee . yoreys fe OnNel Teseg 2 yoLnng youon |(peyeaop) | ‘eouese, | ‘aan | ‘asleee | ‘aga |. : eam, | mee | REPL 2eA0).| ora e[qezty oat | POHed | "Temtay BUC BSED § Policg Ssooxy peyndurog -0qey o2810AV 564 (panuyuoy) IIA ATAVL 565 APPENDIX, gue | szgs't__|_2'90'e L9zz'2 pond eahiy decane be engReSTY L'¥¢ 9°8Ge'L 1° ZO9‘8T ¢'190°ET | 9°699°9% | 6°609 T ne |e Torres cess COs [eseg F916 6 8° 8¢8 9T T'18e+ g FOL+ trrtseseees esau BoM BAT] IO} WOTDAIIOD e'9e3°8__ | €' F2T'OT £96862 gst Lest 2 6e+ srrersts s+ 19qqBUI OTUVSIO OJ WOT}DAIIO|D 8° E188 9° P8091 | O'ZLzZ‘ET | 9'9S8'6% | FESO z Q fcc qoreys + Uorper Teseg 2 yosnqg #°S9 Z 2SS 0° 1622 0° 1622 srrt tees cee cers recesses ssQgmaIaaI ZFS L°S9L'¢ 0'9F9‘0L 6° £2621 6 6LE'8Z @°ZL9 $ An Treteseseeeeseesess gored [eseg. 6 L162 | 0° 286'8T , 9° 38E— 9° S19— sreetesesecs*ag Bam BAT] JO} WOIYAIIOD ¢ 092s _|_9"og9'FI 6 0L8'TS ¥ OT— T'6T— , T'6I— trettess ss IgqqBuUl O1UedIO IO} WOT}I9IIOD 6°09% 8 2°69 | 8 OZEL4T | 0068 TE | T'8E9 z q@ fcc qoreys + worned Teseg < young 9°9F FREE L' P92‘ 1’ £928 Dette tees esse seasons see gouaranIq eee | F9e9'T | SOOT | FTLL‘IT LIL8'St | 0° FPO I TA [or er eet eee ree OO BE Tes e 8 PSPS b'P9E GI T'08¢+ 9°949+ tesessersesssauBioM BATT JO} WOTSLIO LP96'G__|_8°L82'TI 8° SET'FS_ 3 G'9e— 4° 06— ; L°06— stresses ss rgqqeul oTUBsIO 10} UOT}IILION 6'06¢¢ G'S.s‘TT | O'SFE SI | F°9SZFS | 6 169 € TA [OCT qoreys + doled Teseg : yong’ “sS90XKq “s[eO “sTeQ “s[eO “B[BO “833 jo uory | ‘(poz0e1109) ‘90uBUd} |. ‘g0u8ue} ‘AZ IOUT “qq F109 AA -poweg |-jemray -eanyn | uwrepjo | -arewyesg | -uieNy 919821 oAryT ; ; esejusoleg| AdI0U sso0xq paynduop -0qe}0; aseloaAy *(panuyuog) IIA AIAVL APPENDIX. 566 ggg |_¥'ops's | ¢'zse'¢ &" 1898'S ee sep | S422 | beso'r | Ss ize‘el | 6 Pze'ZT | g'Izo | € D EE SITS SS OTS TREE Leeeg | 1 0vr'6 Leht+ T'8ae+ tresses sa FIOM BAT] JOJ WO14¥III0D O'6LU'S | 9°SIT'6 -B BOL‘ 6'09— 1 68T— T° 681I-— “o*9"9*19998UI OIUBZIO IOJ UOIII1ION 6 68S | 2°19¢'6 | 9 GPO'ST | &'106‘es | 2°F49 ¥ D srresesss ss -UorEys 4+ UOlVel [ese yas 8°F9 Z STE 6°800°S 6'800'S terseeesececcseceees soguasaniT Tep | 4°910'% | F'229'F | Go96'ZT | 6 2E9°ZT | g'96¢ | a gOS pie rig a” et ee 6'sce¢ | 8°989'6 o' S8t+ 2°908+ a tresses aUBIOM BATT OJ WOI}D91109 L989 |_9°628'6 8° 969'% 6° F9-— 9°OST— 9°O0ST— cress" 7997 8Ur orued.10 4IOF UOTPDIIION 9'16r's | 2:0es6 | 2 29Z°eT | F°264'22 | 8zI9 | & a Trresrsesss-uoeas + UOlqel [eseg / yosnngy Leg 8° Fes 9° 6It'F 9° 61F'F Hippisire s sactie siete ois Sis S oonia Ta TET 6'o¢ | GS Izs'9 | Z'O99'TT | 6°ZOS'FT | Tg98'9% | 8'F89 T a Totesereerceceescses qoryer Teseg, £9688 |_8°620°9T 6° Sre+ 8° s8T9+ crests sesequGtam OAT] LO} WOTIeLI0D F089‘ _|_ O° T19F'ST 1° 28Z'08 8°9TT— 0° 60¢— 0° 602— "rT o8***I999BUT OIUBSIO JOJ WOT}D1IOD 22998 | 0°OL9°ST | Z°128‘FT | L’T6r‘0e | G6sL | 2 a corres sess ss -uoreqs + oled yeseg 2 YOL04S) *sB00Xq “sTeQ) s18D) ‘s18D “STO “83 jo uot} | ‘(paz0e1109) ‘gousue} ‘gousue} ‘ABIOU “qq31aM -poueg | peutay! ~Bzy0. urery jo -uleyy 19AQ -Uleyy e[qezt] ary : : 938}U9010q| ABI Ssooxq, peynduiog -0qePy azeioaAy ‘(panuyuog) IIA ATHVL 567 9°I¢ SOLS L' F&2‘¢ lL Feo Tetreee re ress esses sess: ssaguaTamIg 69S | G'Izs‘9 | Z°O99'TT | 6°ZOs'rT | I'e98'sz | e789 | T Top esses sneer peseg 2° 820'6_|_€'F68'9T zoog+ | 1°S68+ eee G'82L'8__|_Z'666'ST &' L60'TS O'ZOI- | FZ8I— _ | 88t- "irri its *"eqyeUr orueB10 Joy WoTyoeII0 g°9z8'8 | 9 IST‘OT | O'860'ST | 9°GLT'TE | O/0S2 | & Qo poo + worper peseg “20 muvag “co's "AU SIOM BAT] IOJ WOT}DIIIOD 8° Fo F 89'S 1 9¢8'F 1'9¢8'F SEN AOR ROM ka an naa SS ros reaper - peg | 9 o9%% | 8 ore'r | Lers‘et | soss’zt | I'se9 | * GENE EE OSL TORE, 0’ #06'F 6 Gr : v Lg— $"601— : J[otr ttt sss qu Stem sal] JOf wory0edI09 x F196% | _F'292'6 9 999'%% g LLL 8 Sh + eshtt "Trott" 1999BUr OTUBBIO IO} WOT}D9II0D a L°€88 7 T' POT 6 fo POP EL | € 8090 | F129 € c creeewsss sess *“Yoreys + UOlyel Teseg = * Yyainig 0'9¢ L'PSL‘'2 £°399'9 €°899‘9 SEER SRE A Tass SOE STATO TET 6°89 ' £00°% 2’ 668'S 16868 | 888821 | 6899 v Ho poss: comer peseg 6 LEL¢ 0°890 OT 9° 68— e19— ; vrrresssssss-quBraas @AT] JOJ WOT}DALION G LLL €'SéT OL T'L90 ¥2 6 sot 8'OTL+ P 8 O1l+ “Tress "**7994BUT OTUBBIO IOF WOTYD9LI09 oSIL'S G'PZO OT | 8'IZBET | € 9F6ES | 1° F99 € | Ho jC yareys + uoryer peseg | © Yyosnyg) “sS3OXh i) 4:7) “s[eQ “s[e9 Bie) “sd jo uoly | (peqedi0D) ‘gnueuey ‘eouBue} ‘ABIOUT “M3I2M | -poa7 | = e200, uren jo “ule J2AQ -UlByl 9[qezty eary poreg Tsumy 038}U9010g AdIOUq ssa0xq, peyndu0y -oqeyW eBBIVAYy “(panuyuog) IIA TIAVL F'69 L’PIl'e 2 L8hF 2 L8hP ies See ee Trteeeesesses segouazaiT Ser |e Lzvr | reso | gres‘er | ewer |e | ¢ |p fo ere “mores [ese 0°268'F 9° 0r9'8 T'@tet e psp+ tretecesses sarHam GAT] IO} WOI{ILIOZ 6°649°F | £°990'8 T° 298'TZ 819+ O'IFI+ O'TtT+ tresses surgqaguUL OMUGBIO IO} WOTWELIOZ Isto | e-st6'2 | s'sos‘et | T'1zz‘Iz | s'se9 | ¢ 7 Toreessse To + Woyel [ese * LO Inupeg x 1°¢9 8° e89'Z Zs 896‘ 3962 i i ay +++ -gouaseR ICE g ; a Teh | L°910'% | F'2L9'% | S'096'ZE | 6 LE9‘ZT | G°969 g 7 OI aac es uoryer peseg a. $°009F 9°Sh9'8 x 9° Pest b'9OLL+ Tress esses a STOM QATT OF WOT}DILIOD 6 G9%'F | 2 698° 1 909‘TZ €'Sl1— 0°0LT— O02 ||. HO We. | Rees ****J9498UI OTUVSIO IO} WO1YIVLI0D zsh | 26808 | 6 9eL‘EL | T'92Z'T2 | 6'0S9 g 7 GI he aaheg naan cag “" "TIO + Uoryed Teseg , 220 muvag “ss00xq, “SIBO “STBO “sTeg “sTBO “SSS jo uo | ‘(peqyer109) ‘goueuay ‘gouvua} ‘ABOUT “443194 ‘poweg |jeuyry, 241050 y uler) jo -UIB]l I8AOC -Uleyy e1qe2z1] BATT = 7 eseyueoleg| Adi9Uuq sseoxq] peynduioyg -0gByeyl ese10AV 568 *“(ponuyuog) IIA FIavL 569 APPENDIX. poieinlaase al bepialingeigl <7eete ron econ eve tere detlaneindacyss risa | cae spend Ol O6IS6E F/EZ9T O|ZE6E O'PFF 18/908E O/ESZ9 9/2966 ZISE9E F/T80° 9/098 2/S98"O|S OSHE chr] GE |” * oBvl0ay 0° 68/206 0/6091" 0l98ze" o|og9" 6z\0T9¢" 0 F69 ES/9ZTS T|\F9SS SSFP S|PL0 2/008 O|0 F9F|S SFR) Gof ‘Oo G°Z6|F9S ZIELIO\SLOP' O|ZEL S8/ZE6E 0) LZL° LE/L6Ph" 1/806 9/880 9/0F6 2/908" 0/6 9SF\S OFF] F a ae too @'9G/GL6" LI968T O/Z9FP O\TLI Z6|9FEF 0] 696° ZF\OGSS’ S|/OE0E G|SEE" 2/268" 8/728 0/S T9F|S GFF) F pS” ys 0 OG!ISL O|6FST O/SF98 0.9FF SLIOESE "0 POS ZEIZ8IZ Z|SP60 FIET9 SIST8°9/G28° O19 29PI8° SF} Bf ao» 8° 98l0ee GISZOT OlEzSE"O]ZG8" LZIZOLE 0] SST SE|E298"E|2216' Z|O&6 S|S8L° 9/106 O|S GHFIE SEF, 9 | Goo» e'6sler9’ s|eeZT’ 0/2207 Ole62" e8|8F6e "0 OZh 9E|STZO' FISTFH S|PSh QIE9F LIP68 O|P FHFIG OfF, S |” “tp pono ‘eauaeo ee) | P| eo | ag, qorsag| ‘yea |*809 | “0 ses 99 Beal ae, PMB oe | mae | aee eta ae xed oar Sxl Hod rant | Paiisep | wrethta [adel | [een -00]2 A, *paeasiy, 1049] 10g -aqnutpy Jed “4QU3I0 AA OATT qqSIoM PATTY “ZY Jog ‘TOVAUNS IVLINOZINOH ATUVEN NO NOILOWOOO'T ‘IIIA FIAVL APPENDIX. 57° A8PP'OISELO LITRE eezlParorT feb peels paqaasrtog 846" I8|TFO" LO1|92PF O|ZESO’ T|/80S" ZTZ|OLTO" Tlo9S 98/S9F" 2 |EF OL|TPS’ F1/868° LT|ZFS"O|8 S9F/L°L2FF| . ST | * “eBeIEAy 82h S8/SE9 SII|LP8P O/POFT 1/20" 98Z/SZOL L/SZr‘ L6/8ZS"L |L00° ST/EZF 9T|SES" 0Z,6T8 "0 eka he Z aes Seer) S61‘ 08/806 S6 |9F8E" 0/6706 O/6LT L8T/ZE28"0/S9S" SL/9ZG'9 |8Sh°8 |SOG SI|F86" FT/E98 0 eels v Tre 099 O6|TZL FOT/LTPPF O/OSFO' 1/ZZS STSISLTO' 1/89 PE|OLT TI]L9T 8 |Z26° 9T|LEE" 6T/888"0 ies eee T Eas G86 'SS|OST 92 [Lehr O0FFO' T/GLL°S1Z/Z900' T|FFP 8S/9SZ°6 |FOS'% |9Z0' T1|09L' TT cr6°0 as eas T SD) POUT. 5 r r “urur'o ‘oro i) i) ‘oo : Rae mBH | “SIF? | «uoaéxo fageo | sine ‘qorsig| ‘et | ‘200 ‘Oo ign 3H p qa ‘sseW | ‘ued —} quay ~eddy ‘oucly ‘annie go ‘81d | 4x0 Dewey -on® econ ee *squour WIOM “ya ry ‘3 T wal = pala teal onfea | Pawstweo | qubjeAtibor | -einds on ~0019A, eo aL je10L, . “peeasiy, JeyeyY 190g ‘aynulp Jod JO IGZIOM : qQSIOM VAT “DY 9g “aadvao GLVYACOW ONIGNGOSV “XI WIavL 571 APPENDIX. egegoltzogtit9g¢‘90e| oo foc fede cfer ee foee efor referee eee verses © *naqgamt0g LZ ESTISTT $18ZZ9" O/SS9F" 1|F80° 662/996 FOT|Z66ZI/Z88"8 |S9Z 61|FL8° 1Z|068'O|0' 9SF ES 1hF] OT [SOT EL|"** *oBeroay LGL LETILIb 3] F99°O) OFS." 1/ZZS" FIE|8S6 OT TSFE ETIELG" OTITIS" OSjST6" SZF248"O\S 9SF|S OFF] 9 G06 SL)" °° ” ZSS 6FT1692'T! 1090) STF’ T1008" F8Z/TZ8 9OT OFS 9T\686°F |£90° 06/69 TZ0F6 O10 TSF/0 FFF! T 69° SLi" °° ” SIE LPIIATT' S| TLG°O!] SHE TISZ9 SLZ/LZT SOT/E6L ST|9G9"S |ST6 STI6FF 1Z/S68 0/2 L9F|/8 OSF| € 182° 8L oF letiag ” 866 IST|9ZE°8| 1Z9°0} T9F T/9GO 66Z/ET9 Z6 JOST S1\ZS6°2 |TLL° LI/ZOT OZ|F68O/S ZSF|6 9EF] 9 69° 29) °° "9 ported aan “wn-"1) ess aah eyig er 3 ayeiee Peek ‘wsy | ‘syeo | ‘muro ‘yoreyg| ‘yea | “200 ‘Oo ‘anges 237 jo jo |‘Agieuq)|‘Adioug| ‘uashxQ [ , -eddy|‘ou0,y . wom | FIOM ened ye! pue | es10 7] {si97e weBAXO) qa ‘ on® | ss109 “syueur | PNUTAL joanteA |) pauiquiog FIOM JO £104 -wadxq| ed yoo ueB4xQ qusjeamby — | -eitds jo-on | 43% 1810.L eu 0079 A doy Jed Behe ree “By Jeg ‘oynulyy sod JO FQBIO MW : : WYSE M ArT “BY Jog : ‘“LIVud JO WHOM °X WIAVo ‘ INDEX. PAGE Acid, acetic, effect of, on proteid metabolism. ............e.000 scan 128 total metabolism. ........... eee cece ee ee nes 160 replacement value Of.........00e.se00. DOO re 160 aspartic, formed from proteids....... sass W einele Ss bislale wareria soa 39 oxidized in body.........ccecccceccccees Eee tieRarscaus 52 benzoic, formation of hippuric acid from....... gibsoybiarat ona ricsstxcters axe 44 butyric, effect of, on total metabolism..... VS cehava: eke cotecle Wrstan a etacelers 158 replacement value of....... aiSiareieia snares Ce es 158 glutaminic, formed from proteids.......... w stents sreraisiat aerate 39 hippuric, effect of proteids on formation of................0000- 463 formation of, from benzoic acid..... ota ant vnset cuaseveveusnatiesaes 44 glycocol. ....... sieendreierenuaie(s torcneraiatanhs 44 ANI UTIDG psa 8 hens cg Sckohd eoraheha lara earner se nares tata seou: 44 loss of energy in...........-. ia Pease wa wees 313, 322 non-nitrogenous nutrients as source of............ oe 45 origin of............-. Seaeeausuces far casassbierausiinbvcanearosebinndanats 44 pentose carbohydrates as source Of............-0...--- 46 source of benzoyl radicle of.............eceeee scene 44, 45 lactic, effect of, on proteid metabolism. ............0.eeee scenes 123 total metabolism............00ceececeeeees 158 production of, in metabolism of carbohydrates............ 23 replacement value Of......... 00. ce cece cere eee e eee e eens 158 Acids, organic, absent from excreta..........:. eee e cece tence eee ee ees 27 effect of, on proteid metabolism. .............0.0..008- 123 total metabolism. .......... 00. e cece eee 157 net available energy Of.......... 2. cece cece eee e teens 425 IMObAD OLSON csc. recgissevocts ein as diaveveiie «dienes d, oxavavnasyajacovereauendiaue 26 OFIGIZeR: 1D) DOD Yin. sis sicereiirern aise ccrnsinuwaawiarnweviegiaia 27 produced by fermentation of carbohydrates.......... 13, 26 replacement values Of..........0eee eee e cece ene eeees 157 Acid, uric, in perspiration... 6... 6. eee ee ee eee eee ee eee tenet ees 48 TIN UT ITE isc ver esas geste See senerslg erbea ha eve eve hed eraveveie ss astance uo Sieg 43 origin of..... seen eee eee eee e renee nett et eeeeteeeeee 43 573 574 INDEX. PAGE Activity, muscular, general features of. Ld Ghlalde Rawal nade a obtared oe cte e's 185 Adipose tissues.....02 .csawes seas eee yd cnwe dateaw ee ewes ee oewn Rees 29 Alanine oxidized in body...........- cece cece cece ee cr ce ccescseeeee 53 ANDUTAIOIS, i: 5.oase 5 scaisns 222-0 area eso Srotoe:Searaesind a4 Sous ee Seat auepnie aS caset 7 COMPOUNG sic awn hed ara NewEed oWelees Dawley shake dea 7 composition Of... ....seiseeeeeeeeeeeeneees 62 derived. .......... dir ova’ uate Grave auete ava ee dja svarecake og ween iS 7 Modified ss wedw va saw ss sds 44 Mee Fe Mees Saale s ewe some 7 SUMPI Eo ses cisiand aes Saks aA TA ASE PAROS CE HOT ETERS 7 simple, composition of..... DigiayeabSsiasieeed ers Suare ae a eneele taieas 62 Albumins................ Eg catissdacdh-d Gy aavsia Baha cane’ w) exeasolas & Guiness d.asdeanoves S09 whan 7 Albumoses formed from proteids....... ee ee ee Sen eaeraets 38, 39 Amido-acids. ..........000eeees Gre SBtehalge @ eae sas Cais es eisounes eGo eon 7 Amides........ sion ttn acl duos ite Oaele aid aches stalin staasenata’s ee ee ee 7 formed from proteids........ dade d (Meds awed eee Se eee 7, 39, 52 influence of, on digestibility..............04. siiisieneene s me 4d asain ot aibobydratedk «S << 6sseca ca ccu 57 ee te ss crude fiber................. 57, 58 ea nee nitrogen-free extract........... 57 ae eee "fermentation of carbohydrates................ 55 ene © in digestive tract. ............... 54 Pe se woe eevee stertaxdnate eee ee 52 not synthesized to proteids: fe MoE aed Behe Sa had Sab neaeoaor 53 oxidized in DOdY.... 2.6... see e eee eee ce eee ene e eee neenees 52 replacement of proteids by............. seittas a ae 53 MPC LOeMed 190M can 9 agen Sued eu ren een oiedenanaenty oe 39 Ammonium acetate, | influence of, on digestibility of carbohydrates, .. . 57, 58 oa crude fiber......... 57 oe ds fe nitrogen-free extract. 57 ’ carbonate as antecedent of urea .............0.. cece eee 43 ‘lactate as antecedent of urea...............ccec cece eee 43 salts influence of, on digestibility of carbohydrates... ....... 57 fermentation of carbohydrates. ....... 56 in digestive tract......... 56 3 in perspiration: 4s s.esh viaveewenaes ox Hee esabee ho 48 Amount of food, critical... 2.0.00... cece ccc cece ences eaeeas 408 influence of, on effects of muscular exertion........... 197 net availability of energy........... *.. 430 utilization of energy.................. 466 AnabolisMy, 5 3:6 usc ae ees aiek cahidlea’s outing Sade leeeee eeuee ends 16,17 absorption of energy in......... 0... cece e cece cece eee eeee 17 OP PLOLElAS sg:6 9 cians s sie sede ares SARE Sk OE owes eas 38, 41 Animal, efficiency: Of... osi.054 cow eis says tsee ee cae skews vas 496, 498, 511 BS MOCON yy 552 4s tosis cna evens, oe dsndicd 5 She Wiese Meme Duasare es 498 INDEX. 575 STADE Os gc wis.cie bored grad wwe d ww Cae aes 512 individuality on.................00, 517 kind of work on load on SIZE ON ey ee ek ae oa CRE ae dow Cuneta 515 SPECIES OMS see ga sieeie acne da Sows eae 515 Speed O00... 24 sien seetinwaaresgeays 513 training on , method of determining..................-...00- 498 Antecedents Of reas iica'ssarg dame Ys yet sate eee eee eea eb seblew was 42 Aromatic compounds in urine. ....... 00... eee ec e nee eee eens 46 Ascent, work of, in dog, consumption of oxygen in................000- 500 utilization of energy in... ......... 0... cece eee cece eee 510 effect of grade on............. 512 load on... ... 509, 510, 515 Ash ingredients, balance of.......... RaGiena cls Gitievessoedicantiancaeewee wuld keel 79 Asparagin, influence of, on digestibility. .............. 00. c ce eee eens 54 of carbohydrates.............. 57 erude fiber. .............. 57, 58 nitrogen-free extract........ 57 fermentation. ...... ee ee Or 54 nutritive value Ofss is csas ose sax sage sues bs san DeeRee es eed 54 oxidized in: BOY: scccc 2208-0 cae she ees FRG ER eae ee ieee 52 replacement of proteids by......... 0... cece cece e eee e ees 54 typical of non-proteids. 0.0.0.6... 6c cece cece eee eee 8 Aspartic acid formed from proteids. . ....... 60... e cece eee eee eee eees 39 oxidized in) bodys... <.eeg . sus 24 ab ee Seid eee so Helee ieee 52 Assimilation, expenditure of energy in digestion and.. ............ 372. 375 tissue building and. .... 491 of fat, loss of energy in... . ...... esse eee eee ig aeean mente 35 SOFIC GL ese 2 AN Oe at We eco UES a 337, 372, 375 digestion and. ... 2.0... cece eee eee eee 80, 93, 406 above critical point............... 407 Of BONE: te. sae ew ace ais ere 381 carbohydrates. ........ 379, 382, 384 PAtite Sdecids Rawat 378, 382, 384, 385 mixed diet................ 382, 384 proteids.............. 381, 382, 384 indirect utilization of heat from.... 406 576 INDEX. PAGE Assimilation, work of, digestion and, in dog... ......6-seeeeseeeeeeees 378 DOMSE:.. oie ase ss aide conew bese es 385 POLAT So, ccascsis' gi. aasaies ee aesin's we sperei st 382 methods of determining........... 377 relation of, to surface............ 408 Availability of energy, gross... 11.1... e cece eee eee eee tenes 270, 395 for maintenance.......... 396, 406, 410, 413, 427, 497 WOT sis:dccus Sucdsdadl bv eacragaw aa asen ea BEE .. 497 MO bere wiiceeareaue se ae heb danas ave ancee a dione nieneig ts 394, 412 net, of energy, determination of..............0-- 413, 427, 428 in carnivora ..... 413, 427, 428 herbivora...... 418, 427, 428 distinction between utilization and......... 395 of carbohydrates. ...........- 417, 419, 427, 428 erudé fiber... 0.2 sasseee eck awk esas 422, 428 tices: oie oa non 16a ee 416, 419, 427, 428 organic acids........... 0.00 cece eee eee 423 PENtOses ys cic Comins ais ws oe beers 420, 428 proteids..............5..2.... 414, 427, 428 timothy: hay: sess veei es eee bee be ee oe 424, 428 influence of amount of food on............. 430 character of food on............ 431 relation of maintenance ration to...... nae 432 Barley, utilization of energy of... . 6.6... cee eee cece eee tenes 483, 491 Beet molasses, metabolizable energy of .............0.e0e00- 293, 297, 301 , digestible protein of......... 318, 332 utilization of energy of. ............. 0.000 e eee 483. 490. 491 Benzoic acid, formation of hippuric acid from............... 00 cece eee 44 Benzoyl radicle of hippuric acid, source Of.............0 00s eeeeeee 44, 45 Blood, consumption of dextrose of. in muscles... ...........--2000000e 22 parotid gland. .................. 22 Cextrose: Of: cua gunek! b5 daceewiegass Qudleu soe Sadie sen Ges Bea aps 17,18 fat production from....... 0.0.0. c cece eee cee eens 23 percentage Of v2 cc giekag Ge ces deu secede eee Ese wee 18 variations IN. ....... 2... eee eee eee 18 fate of dextrose of................44. Piceaduc tsa tailses ene aes aed 22 Le VUlOseas 2 santas mark aig ete. ancd Brea dw oaee Due oe a aeenea aie Aras 7 peptones absent from........... 0.00 cece eee eee eee 40 regulation of supply of dextrose to... ..... cece eee eee eee 18, 20 Body, animal, components of... 2.0.0.0... 2.00. eee eee eee ee eee 1 COMpPOSIEION Ofc socisalocs Fede ks Rises a dies oe ee a ee 60. 64, 66 conservation of energy in......... cece eee eee 228, 258 liberation of energy IN........... cece cece eee eee eee 1 store of energy in... 2... eee cence eee eee aae 1 transformations of energy in.......... ccc cece cece eee 2 INDEX. : 577 PAGE Body schematie:ocnses sted owaw sa was s ean te wes 44 oes omenan Sa 60, 66 Bone, work of digestion and assimilation of............... ec cece eeeee 381 Butyric acid, effect of, on total metabolism. ........... 0... eee ee eee 158 replacement value of.............. cece eee eee e eer eee 158 Caloriein:. cm vrs saad ta We ¥ Haga ested ka GeG ae Hee edie ee Met e beste oes 232 Calorimeters; animal; ..:..5 624. 0.0 s4 awe saeco sakes Hoaee aa; feeders 246 Carbohydrate radicle in proteids........... 00... cece cece cece eee ees 50 Carbohydrates: csscciansiiiiie tema ia beat ee ds aad ee baa 8 apparent digestibility of, influence of amides on......... 57 ammonium salts on. 57 asparagin on....... 57 non-proteidson.... 57 as source of energy to body......... 0... c cece ee eees 91 consumption of, in muscular contraction.............. 220 digestible, gross energy Of... 0.0.0.0... e gece ene ee ees 308 metabolizable energy of............ 324, 327, 332 utilization of energy of .......... 475, 477, 490, 491 disappearance of, in fasting. ............ esse ee eee ees 85 effects of, on minimum of proteids...............0000 135 proteid metabolism................00.005 115 compared with fat..... 127 total metabolism. ..............000 220s 146 fermentation Of......... 2. 0c cece cece eee eee e eens 12,13 influence of amides on... ............ 55 ammonium salts on....... 56 asparagin ON............. 55 nop-proteids on.......... 55 on nutritive value ........ 13 organic acids from.............-.--- 13, 26 products of..........0.0eeeee eee eee 13 formation of dextrose from, inliver .............. 19, 20, 21 fat froMs. 62. c wees ees e sea ants 24, 30, 165 equation for. .............0-00-- 24 respiratory quotient in........... 179 glycogen from. . ....-..-. 0. sere seen ee 20, 21 milk fat from... 0.0... eee eee eee eee 174 hexOses ch cues acid ag Man haws Ae Bw tebe ees Set 8,9 formation of glycogen from. .............--- 20, 21 metabolism of. See Metabolism .............. resorption Of, 6.1... eee e eee ee eee eee eee 12,17 rate‘Ol;...ainc.c6 eee ose ees sled game 18 liver as reservoir Of.. 11... 0. ee cece eee cette eeee 20 metabolism of See Metabolism mutual replacement of fatand . .........-.seee crease 151 net availableenergy Of. «6.6... eee ee eee 417 419. 427, 428 578 INDEX. PAGE Carbohydrates, of crude fiber. ......... ec cece eee e cere t eee e ence ences 9 food, replacement of proteids by...........seeeeees 149 nitrogen-free extract 2.0.2... cece cece ences _ 9 oxidized, computation of, from respiratory quotient 76 PENtOSE. 0 eee rere ee ee eee tenet teen eee 8,9 assimilability of...... 00.0... sce c eee e cence eee 25 as source of hippuric acid.............60000-- 46 determination. Oof........... cece cece eee eee 9 digestibility of....... 0.0... ccc eee eee ee eee 24 effects of, on proteid metabolism.............. 124 ’ total metabolism................ 156 formation of fat from............ 0 eee e eee eee 183 glycogen from.................. 25, 26 metabolism of. See Metabolism............... OF crude. Aber + ace awsiels otavhae ti aimaccen ayemelacnive 9 nitrogen-free extract..............-....0.. 9 oxidized in body............. cess eee eens 25. replacement value of...............2. 000008 156 replacement value of......... 0.0... cece eee e eee eee 152 TesorptiOn Of 5.0) Heated eras dE EES ee Sees a 12 respiratory quotient of............. ccc eee eee ees 74 subdivisions Of............cc ese ccceceseeeceeenes &,9 substitution of, for body fat...............0 0c ceeee 146 utilization of energy of............ 461, 462, 473, 490, 491 value of, for maintenance.................000-- 400,402 work of digestion and assimilation of...... 379, 382, 384 Carbon balance computation of fat from... 2.2.2... 6. cece eee eee 77 heat production from nitrogen and...... 255 dioxide, determination of, in respiration..................... 69, 73 produced by fermentation of carbohydrates............ 13 production of, in fasting..............00...0 cece eee 84 metabolism. ..................0000. 14,15 of carbohydrates......... 23, 27 fabs. ccmeonsescae eaeets 36 : proteids............... 42 equilibrium, amount of proteids required to produce............ 105 factor for computation of fat from...............0 ccc eee 62, 78 income and outgo of... .. 0... 0... cece cc en ence ceanes 69 determination of................0. 00000. 69-73 of excreta, determination of.............. 0.0. cece cece cee eeee 69 metabolism, effect of muscular exertion on.................... 209 Carnivora, determination of net availability of energy in.. ......413, 427, 428 hippuric acid in urine of.....0.. 0... eee eee eee 44 metabolizable energy of food of............. 0.0. cece eee 272 utilization of energy by... 0... 0... ccc cece cece ee eee cess 448, 466 INDEX. 579 Cattle, excretion of methane by............. cc cece cece ateeeceeeeeers "243 Cellulose, effects of, on proteid metabolism..............cccecceeeeeees 117 total metabolism............. eee e eee e ee eeee 162 fermentation Ofse sinc: saeenatiwe douse ahaa aw beute vw eeeawaeee 13 formation of fat from........... 2 eee cece cece tee eee eee 181 of crude: Dberccwsen 2 aus sa dea sideeawnme cede iedaee Paset ese 9 replacement value of........... 0. eee e ec e ener e eee eee eee 162 Changes, chemical, during muscular contraction. ............0.ee0e 186, 189 thermal, during muscular contraction. ...............0. 00005 189 CTY DOS se: geo ces wits eden aitess aan Hate Rhatad el AISNE SS a WA end Wid S 40 Circulation, effects of muscular exertion OD..........c.ccce eee eee ee eeeeee LOL Work: Of: s< jens ave vane os 4 ere ¢ ate ee eet ed was ew aS nes 341 Cleavage digestive of proteids..... 2.0.0... cece cece tenet cece 38 PUEPOSE Ob oi5.5ic scisvaiaie eavaie in Hotes ivee Seorsia beers 38 nitrogen of proteids....... 0... cc cece ce eect eee t ee eeeee 98 GAUSEKOL. seit ce gain nee ewan eget 100, 101, 103 effects of non-nitrogenous nutrients on..... 131 independent of total metabolism.......... 99 Of fat: in Gigestion. . .4a..cs as csee kes ana ts dee yi eeas sews s 12 proteids in digestion. . 0.0.0.0... cece eee tee e eee eeee 12, 38 PUPPOSE OF). cee c a eee cee sees 38 products rebuilding of proteids from..........-.....e0eeeee 40 Cleavages, influence of, on computation of heat production............ 253 by an enzym.......... 40 Coarse fodders, expenditure of energy of, in digestion, assimilation, and tissue building. ..... 0.0... cece eee cee ee ee eens 491 metabolizable energy of.. .285, 286, 287, 290, 297, 298, 300, 301 digestible protein of.........320, 332 carbohydrates of. .327, 332 non-nitrogenous matter of urine derived from.......... 28 relative value of grain and, for maintenance.... .433, 533, 537 work production...... 534, 537 utilization of energy Of.........2. eee eee e eens 484, 490, 491 Coefficient of utilization of energy..........-- 2s sere eee ence eee 444, 498 Collagens.... 00.0.6 cece cece ene een erent eee e nen nent eters 7 composition Of....... 6.6 cece eee eee een eee cent eee ee 62 Combustion, heats of... 2.0.6.0... cece nee eee cnet enn en reese 229 Concentrated feeding-stuffs, metabolizable energy of........... 289, 297, 299 ‘digestible protein Of iezateks 3 315, 332 utilization of energy of..........4. 472, 490, 491 Conservation of energy .....-.-eee eee eeeeeee Riess bv aposmadens wigs olewtesce 228 in animal body........-.-02 eee eee eee eee 229, 258 Contractile substance of muscle............ 06s eee e eee ete tenes 17 Contraction, muscular... ....-...ee 2 cece ener enter erent eee enes 185 580 INDEX. Contraction, muscular, chemical changes during............+-+++06+ 186, 189 consumption of carbohydrates in................ 220 dextrose in...........542-.-.220, 221 PBOMMCETIC Hess o:05.¥cb ered 34 tie baa Wamne Boe sews OH 495 WSOC CS 6. 50 5ccus eves. acenesg oe cused a Neecdad Dated HS Nadie 495 oxidations in, incomplete..................05 186 oxygen not essential t0............0 cece eee eee 188 respiratory quotient of muscle in.............. 187 thermal changes during...............0ccee eee 189 transformation of energy in................00 495 CREB sc bic di 6: ie ead Hea ne gc Sond WE Rand ie HT AG ASO atare ea Bae Hie es 46 Creatinin........ Be Shan desig bebe ep seal wedi hiner dais Simiah sg auatona ae uae Sos ee 46 in perspiration... 2... ... 00. cece ec cee cence eer ceeenecrens 48 CRUDE fats ig cana copes authnauSi¥ Biel e.d WA Salas Syotaneie athe, Siagbln tec d oisuek Sak been 8 GID EP sate vis wrasse savin aeeta Ae Race ae ieee do abana Seales arovbebie. eye Qian 9 apparent digestibility of.. is vee ee Ps anfluence of amidesiti Oly aiviseiawt Cerne 57, 58 ammonium acetateon. 57 asparagin on......... 57, 58 non-proteids on.......57, 58 carbohydrates:Of, 2c swig Gacieew Ps hee Shaan RS eS 9 COM MOE Of ocosscdsig2 so eseiesc due else dhe ate shiesare inna 8. head ereee ae 9 digestible, gross energy Of.......-...c:ccc cece eee eeeeeeeerees BOS metabolizable energy of............0eeeeeeeeee 329, 332 digestive WOrk FOP. ioc... cee coe nace ce bie ee wees cee ee euens 389 effect of, on total metabolism. ............. 00s eee ee eee eee 161 expenditure of energy of, in digestion, assimilation, and’ tissue building 3.5 5f daecacmevawaed ts eater eae ss yee ss Sees es 494 formation of fat from. ....... cee eect eee e eee 181 PUPFULONAS OL ss. aee sche epiayaasecatatcsndsk cuosdnd. 4 gens Sa Greasese eum 9 ligneous material of... 0.0.0... cece eee eee e eee eee eeeeee 9 modified in digestive tract......... cc cee c cece e eee eee 12 net available energy Of .......... 2. cece eee eee cece ences 422, 428 pentose carbohydrates Of......... 0. ccc e eee ee ee eee ee ees 9 replacement value Of.......... 0. eee e eee eee eee eee eee 161 value of, for maintenance.............eeeeeeee eens 435, 535, 537 work production ..........ceeeee cess eeu 535, 537 Descent, work of....... Fie aottegs cn MEIE CLARIF pasha Teen NSE ees 509 influence of grade ON. .......cec cece sence cence eens 509 Dextrose, amount of, produced by liver...........:ec0es cece cece eeeeeee 19 consumption of, in muscles...........-0... ee cece e ene tenes 221 muscular contraction.................220, 221 formation of fat from. ........ cc ewe ec cee cence eee ee nee 23 from Se aaE in liver............... 19, 20, 21 fat.. itilide Canis Sues MOR aw . 86, 385 INDEX. 58x PAGE Dextrose, formation of, from fat during muscular exertion............. 223 equation for...............- od areteie'g 38, 51 ME VOR aniaice eciotectceersiengs vie os aioe 36, 37 PYOLEIAS i jowicsies quanto hea svaeouns 19, 21, 49, 50 glycogen from. ........... cc cece eee eees 20, 21, 22 in muscles. ...........000ee0e0- 23 importance of constant supply Of. ............ ccc ee eee ees 18, 21 liver'as SOUPCE Of. 4... esac anes a aew.w baad ae ones’ 18, 19, 21, 49 on carbohydrate diet.................505. 19 on proteid diet... ........00.ee cece reece 19 method of formation of, in liver.......... ede Ucenatby Sinha cused 20 Of blood): 420 aisce eo conepats a ctendiaba we soy pees 47 PROteld cule selene iar even eee cammen eee aes aoa 15, 38 -and nitrogen excretion. ............0.cc eee eee 97 determined by supply......... eae cues Banal 128 effects of acetic acid on... 2.2.0... cece 123 carbohydrates on...............0000005 115 compared with fat..... 127 cellulose on. ....... 0... cece cece cece eee 117 excess of proteids on................00. 96 fat ON. te ginny ss sete Spa A a Aie oes 114 compared with carbohydrates..... 127 lactic acid on... 2.2... eee cece eee 123 muscular exertion on............... 194, 206 influence of amount of food on........ 197 non-nitrogenous nutrients on... ...... 114, 125 duration of.. 128 magnitude of 128 INDEX. 599 PAGE Metabolism, proteid, effects of organic acids on....................... 123 pentose carbohydrates on.....:......... 124 proteid supply on...............0...00. 94 STARCH Os oawsis danrenniayadahanes meneean eh 116 SUBATS HON cess se dueley ea deny ek Biase w Give wove oa 116 expressed in terms of flesh...................... 68 glycocol intermediate product of................. 44 identity of, in different animals.............. 817, 335 on different feeds.................... 322 In fasting, < 024 a.+ccacaehcumashangaadany aetoniene 81, 90 minimum of proteids less than.......... 136 tends to become constant............ 81, 90 two factors of.............000 cee eee 81, 90 intermediate productsin................0.00200. 44 intermediary... ......0. 00000000 cece cece eee eee 91 production of carbon dioxide in.................. 42 phosphoric acid in................. 42 sulphuric acid in................... 42 ureain..... Bisset ten eal aut adNan ates 42 water in......... asreccersa auto pana 42 ratio of, to total, in fasting........... 86, 88, 89, 90, 93 Ureaias Measure: Ofc. dagess wens Bees deme yciewe 68 relations of, to food supply............ 0. ccc cece eee eee 93 relative effects of hay and grain on....................... 388 total, computation of................2.5. Cdrawecde made eek 78 effect of acetic acid on. ...... 0... 0. eee cece cece ee 160 butyric-acid Onis. gesexneer ssasee Saeed ams 158 CRN UI OSE ON sic tases ce asses ae Sys San aE ann oe Buck 162 crude fiber on... 2.0.6... eee eee eee eee 161 VACtIEIACIE ORs sinc2 nda: weadoyd hae stan aie 158 TGA OTs, yeeciness sags a arene eee phair aint 509, 515 non-nitrogenous ingredients of feeding-stufts Os sae ck ees cauena aos 154 nutrients on........... 144, 154 organic acids on........... 0. eee e cece eee 157 pentose carbohydrates on.................. 156 proteid supply on........... 0... eee ee eee 104 ; ThAMNOKE OD esse sede Pa eR clades Sa lelene see 15" IN PAStINGs < ssid ged de haces ee Reo 83, 90 proportional to active tissue............ 86,95 nitrogen cleavage of proteids independent of......... 99 ratio of, to proteid, in fasting.............. 86, 88, 89, 90 urea produced in........ eee cece cece eee eee e eect ewenes 14,15 water produced in...... ee ee 14, 15 Methane, excretion of, by cattle... ... 0. ccc eee eect e cece eeeneeeee 243 600 INDEX. PAGE Methane in excreta, determination of...........00cce cece ce eereees 69, 72 losses of energy in...........2 eee ee eeeee 310, 325, 328, 330, 335 produced by fermentation of carbohydrates.............-.-- 13 Methods of investigation............. 0c cece cece eect een e ee te ences 234 Milk fat, formation of, from carbohydrates.............000e cece eee 174 Minimum demands of vital functions............. 0c cece cece eee eees 80 OL PFOUELAS eg 5.3 ou nise aivipievsls es se aoe Hare ase ace Litaaacaers 133 amount of non-nitrogenous nutrients required to POACH sccicd kranhee ye SEE Dae De aus hee evcvormsaadensecard 139 effect of carboydrates on.........-.. cess eeeeee 136 fat ONS sch ted sepa awakes vee eles 135 ‘non-nitrogenous nutrients on............ 134 on health: ; 3: secs see% t aeee ceed eee 143 LOP-HETDIV OTA. suciesonre Gite. cs cule URES A Be Ba eas 140 IN fAStING: -i56.0 oe siiend 1 eos waale kes 82, 83, 90, 94 less than fasting metabolism...................- 136 Mixed diet, work of digestion and assimilation of.................. 382, 384 grains, utilization of energy Of.......... 0c. cece cece cee eeee 483, 491 Méckern experiments........ ee re ee ee 281, 455 Motor, efficiency of animal as............. 0. sce ecee eee eter eeeeeees 498 Mucins, composition of...........0. 0.22 e cee e cece ence eect eeeeenes 62 Muscle, consumption of dextrose in... ...... ccc cee eee e se eeeeee 22, 221 contractile substance Of........... 0... eee e eee eee eee eeeeees 17 CMICIENCY OF SINAN o2 Mei e a alesis aupeeiis steed ee stdets ening Deen 495 CXITACUIVES Oly... saudsci. Siseln ee Se Mer euew ss Samees ame LS Mews Ses 8 formation of glycogen In... ..... cc cece cece cece cece ee eeeeens 23 respiratory quotient of............ ie chess iOS REE oe Were rans 187 resting, storage of dextrose in.............. Caran See cae ne tre ae 222 ORY SEMIN ors c sae otha cend eatiweiw-ele nies aiserewe ae 222 voluntary, work Of... 0.0.0... 0. ccc cece eee ee eevee eeeeeeseens 337 Nails, COMP OSIELON, Of 1.20. cannitinerea save phe een Sie ¥ nated ae dhe. eabaels Soe 63 Nitrogen-free extract, apparent digestibility of Cg PORE ta we SG ew Eas 12 influence of amideson.... 57 ammonium acetate on. 57 asparagin on. 57 non-proteids Occ vias S57 carbohydrates Of..........0ce ccc e cece ec ceeeees 9 digestible, gross energy Of...........0..0005 305, 306 furfurolds Of; vec duck ind sins ceeea eae ode eania dence 9 pentose carbohydrates Of............ ccc eee e eee 9 Nitrogen balance, computation of heat production from carbon and..... 255 cleavage of proteids.. 2.2.20... cc cece eee c eee eee e cence eens 98 CRUSE! Oly ics cutee ee'ew Sawin teow 100, 101, 103 INDEX. 601 PAGE Nitrogen cleavage of proteids, effects of non-nitrogenous nutrients on.... 131 independent of total metabolism......... 99 content of proteids....... 0.0... cece ec eee c cece eee ees 39 equilibrium, amount of proteids required to reach............ 94 estimation of protein from. ........ 0... cece eee cece ee eeee 5, 6 excretion, effect of proteids ON. ......... 0. cece ce eeeee cece 94, 96 OLTTCC Ss oe rsici dine adnan SGaw NAL GES RATS a REET RES 42 proteid metabolism and. ................ eee e seen 97 TGS Osean) Faas caters esa sree crate eno anancto ce atalane eas ele 98 effects of non-nitrogenous nutrients on...... 130 excretory, measure of proteid katabolism.................04: 42 factor for computation of non-proteids from... .............. 8 : protein from..............66. 67, 68, 77 gain or loss of, by body.........-.0ceceeeeeeeee ieee pee aee 66, 67 income and outgo Of... .... cece eee teen eee e eee 66 IN, PETSPiPAtl OM a. i!s isixiye ee sss 6 dig wisielsce ees fee ei ghasigra aie erase ese se 48 metabolic; in feces sce s+ ies os geet Oessd Dee eRe conde ceeaa 47 percentage of, in body protein... ....... 0... cece eee ees 62, 65 POLES, 56 1h ora eselkuess os dae acaradern toad 35 eb 6,7 PLObeMN.. 42g aaeS eae Ma dawars mel ewa 6, 62, 65 Non-proteldss.2. ssc isin as Sis Need Fi Ca wEN ES Css Mag SOS 7 asparagin typical of. ......... ccc cece e eee een eeee 8 determination Of......... 0... ccc ccc cece cece ee ee ences 8 factor for computation of, from nitrogen..............-5 8 in feeding-stuffs. 2.0.6.0... cece eee ene 6 influence of, on digestion. ........... 0. cece ee eee e eens 54 apparent digestibility of carbohydrates... 57 crude fiber... 57, 58 nitrogen-free ex- tract........ 57 fermentation of carbohydrates........... 55 fermentations in digestive tract.......... 54 of animal body.......... ccc cece cece eee ence e eee eeees 8 oxidized in body... .. 6.56. s esse cece cence renee ee eeees 52 metabolism Of.......20 02 cece eee eee e eee ee en ee eeees 52 nature Of... 0... cece cece eee eee cece e teen eens 7 not synthesized to proteids..........-.2+eee reer eens 53 produced by cleavage of proteids..........+++++seeeees 7,8 replacement of proteids by.....--..+++esseeeeeerreeees 53 resorption Of... ....eeeeee cree cece e eee e ere teteae reese 12 Nutrients, available... 0.02.0... cece eee rece eee e enn t een eee eetes 10 digestible, energy of. .....-... 2+ secre ee reer eer eeeeee 302, 306 BTOSS. 0. ee cece ee eee eee aioe epine lets 8 302 metabolizable. ..........--+++ 310, 332, 333 factors for...... -302, 332, 333 602 INDEX. PAGE Nutrients, fiber-free, utilization of, in work production............. 541, 543 computed........ 547 isodynamic replacement of............0.. 2c ccc eeeee recone 152 isoglycosic replacement Of.............0+0000+ poseaanglale eka 153 metabolizable energy of, utilization of, in work production.... 545 modified in digestive tract......... 0... cece eee e eee e eens 12 mutual replacement of........0 00... e eee eee ee eee 148 nop-nitrogenous, amount of, required to reach minimum of Proteidsis sédecs ees sad sie aneseden + 139 as source of hippuric acid.................. 45 effects of, on metabolism. ............. 114, 125 minimum of proteids.......... 134 nitrogen cleavage of proteids... 131 proteid metabolism. ...... 114, 125 magnitude Ob sces ds 128 duration of. 128 rate of nitrogen excretion...... 130 total metabolism. ........ 144, 154 formation of fat from.................005 162 of feeding-stuffs, formation of fat from...... 180 mutual replacement of................0005 154 substitution of, for body fat............... 144 utilization of excess Of..............0eeee 162 percentage of oxygen in....... 2... ieee cece eee 5 Telativer VAlUGS) Obi: is cides ecaiediaseed spade naraideatearayden da dadwse’ op 152 in work production..................0005 522 replacement values of... 2.0.0.2... cece cece cece ees 152, 396 Nutrition, function of. 00.0.0... cece ence cen ene en neta nee 2 StAUSHICS Oli. Ske ciwiate mn caveices agence Me eeaon ete bare aa 3 Oat straw, metabolizable energy of..................000. 290, 297, 300 301 utilization of energy of...............0. ccc eeee 485, 490, 491 Oil, metabolizable energy of............... 000 ccc cece ee eee 296, 323, 332 utilization of energy Of. .......... 0. cece cece eee e teens 478, 490, 491 Organic acids, absence of, from excreta..............000cceueeeeeenee 27 net availability of energy of...............00ccc cee eee 423 Gridived im BOd yy cdce cs pap wen eensiace ys Mesek sanity 27 matter, digestible, gross energy of.............0..0. cece eeeee 309 metabolizable energy of............... 297, 307 utilization of energy of................000- 490 total, metabolizable energy of................08 284, 285 utilization of energy of..............0005 455,461, 490 substances, heats of combustion of...............ceceeeeeeee 237 Oxidations incomplete in muscular contraction...............0000e0 0 186 Oxygen balanies ss sicetecosion os augue vues 24 Baw vs sie ee dla ag heer iad Od 79 INDEX, 603 PAGH Oxygen, consumption of, determination of..............0.005 70, 71, 73, 79 in fasting.................... Peder Am a ee 84 locomotion, by dog. ..............c cece eee 500 horse.............. 504, 506, 507 : metabolism.................0c eee 14, 15, 16 work of ascent by dog. ..............000005 500 NOTECs a. tage eden ead Qeuek 506 draft by dog................0000 ee 501 hors@wexisinwecude pba wel 507 not essential to muscular contraction...............000cee eee 188 percentage of, in excreta. ....... 0... cee eee cee ene 15 MUCPIONUS, 5 bios ie P gigar ne tanes nate Nae anaies 15 . Storage of, in resting muscle.............. 0.0 c cece cece eee 222 Parotid gland, consumption of dextrose of blood in................... 22 Peanut oil, metabolizable energy of ............. 00 e cece eee 296, 323, 332 PONCOSADS, oer awe i aarneeetrah ae ns eten hele are cece wea wedded akeee 8 : OXIGIZED tii DOD. .0'k asie'ss s Gace ep de gs age ah Se De eeree 26 Pentose carbohydrates. See Carbohydrates. Pentoses svete s eGida sade anes het Se aes de eee eee Ss 8 formation of glycogen from............ 00sec cece eee eee 25, 26 A UPIN G5 Ste deere oh en dela eis ae Sapiens A alee Sosa 25, 26 metabolism Off sissies ac gee sees oe sigs aie Sign ea g Re sae ee See Be 24 net availability of energy of................ 00000000. 420, 428 Oxidized In body. 20.0. s.0c08 weaaadiee ss Gods ve Mee ye g eye yA 25 Peptones absent from blood. ........... 0.00. 40 formed from proteids.......... 0.0.0 cece cece e eee eee 12, 38, 39 produced during digestion. .......... 6... c cece cence eens 12 synthesis of, to proteids by an enzym...................45- 40 Perspiration, ammonium salts in. ... 2.6... cece eee eee eens 48 creatimin In... 6... nets 48 TLETOS OTA M se osetia Racy ies sess 8 Ann A Hae sts fas aace Summa pre, Beceem ton 48 nitrogenous matter in... 6.6.6... ee eee eee eee eee 42 potential energy Of.......0 0.0... cece cece eee eee eet 242 ‘-proteids in... ......... ec eee eee Cake Pathe Peeabiesieees 48 NCH [ses cleave os aguue: cankeineee ee eee eet 48 MPIC ACIG IDs ies Satin santas pate Reee gues Mode tweed 48 Phenols in urine... 0.2... 6.0 cee eee eens wee. 27, 46 Phosphoric acid, production of, in metabolism of proteids.............- 42 Phosphorus balance. ... 11.6.6... cece cee eens 79 Plasteltiewe exc wadaad cae we oi:35 scsi sto sad oid eds Reed uaa Mea Rees 133 amount of non-nitrogenous nutrients required to PEACN ornare Hyena eas oaemee cee eRtoel a 139 effect of non-nitrogenous nutrients on........... 134 effects of, on health. ...............0c eens eoeee 148 INDEX. 605 PAGE Proteids, minimum of, for herbivora.................. Sie Ravee BweS 140 IN FASUIN ae acigacc a cacs's «Haka keeles coe 82, 83, 90, 94 influence of carbohydrates OTS sss easasee Genel. cata 136 PRUON finial nsscuaceea Aecnautexaeeek 135 less than proteid metabolism in fasting.......... 136 molecular weight of........... 0000s ccc ee cee cececccceees 15 DAUUNC OF. fet ss.00 « wntoh Waar se aheu-ca Gaede mend Bammer hadlae wale 39 net availability of energy of..............0.ccccuee 414, 427, 428 nitrogen cleavage Of... 6.0... ccc cece cece cus cececee 98 cause Of. . 0.0... . cece eee ee 100, 101, 103 effects of non-nitrogenous nutrients on.... 131 independent of total metabolism......... 97 COMPEME OR oie haatiuca Westen HAM Os winie deh baud Geta eie s 6, 7, 39 non-nitrogenous residue of... 2.0.0.0... 0. cc cece ccc eeeee 48, 98 1 0 Se 49, 98 formation of sugar from...... 49, 50, 98 non-proteids not synthesized to.........0.0.0 00 cc cece eee aee 53 peptones formed from. .............. 0c ccc cee eee ees 12, 38, 39 percentage of nitrogen in........... 00. c cece cece eee eees +. 6,7 proteoses formed from. ........... 00.0. cece cece seen eens 12, 39 putrefaction of, in intestines. ........0.... 0. ccc cece eee 44, 46 products of..... ssh Game Sian 44, 46 rebuilding of, from cleavage products...............eeeeeees 40 replacement of, by amides...............00cbcceeeeeeeeeues 53 ASPATA GINS cs itis cia Sa sachud cats. sade. Shoko. cie dbaun 54 DOG y Tati xs cicis aiceierko.2 Gioweas Solara es daw 149 fats and carbohydrates of food............ 149 non-proteids. ...... 0... 0. eee eee eee eee 53 PESOPPtlOn OF. sae os swe asec. es-sigindes geste onwe wee Ue arORare Fee 12 respiratory quotient of............... 0c cece cece een ees 74, 75 synthesis of peptones t0....... 0.2... cc cee cece eee eee eee 40 substituted for body fat... 0.0.0... cece cece ee ee eee eee 104 Proteid supply, effects of, on metabolism..............:....+++.0+ 94, 104 proteid metabolism. .............-0.0000- 94 total metabolism...............0. ee eeee 104 Proteids, terminology Of io. s0)5. ce.6 cease oeeaie 83 BG oa Meade cok ERE ESS 5,7 transitory storage Of... 0.0... 00. ccc e eect eee eee eee eee 96 tyrosin formed from. ....... 6. ccc cece eee tenet eines 39 utilization of energy of......... 0.00. cece eee ee ee eens 482, 491 EXCOSS Of sscccetee see ts meee tote eee aey ews 107 work of digestion and assimilation of................ 381, 382, 384 Protein, circulatory................. Mock nie Glo laud wis ocak ete aaa OE ROAS 82 Composition Of... 22... cece cece eee enter eee ene e een eeees 62 digestibility of, real........ ia sie! oa aveke Spates ed alsa eee ai pee <8. 10 digestible, gross energy Of.......+.++eeeeees sae sia aus ‘aeeeeeces 3809 606 INDEX. PAGE Protein, digestible, metabolizable energy of .. 310, 315, 317, 318, 320, 327, 332 utilization of energy of........... sdidches pesieloea Out 481, 491 estimation of, errors in... 1... cc eee eens 6 from DItrOgeDs 4. saasccicden dere cte eek ied eas 5, 6 factor for computation of, from nitrogen.............. 6, 67, 68, 77 in human [0008.04.02 cea eevee ees bee eee des ana ees 6 gain or loss of, by body. io i. cs00 ecaeeecedna dca ewes a wenens 66 potential energy of................0005- ee 244 in feeding-stuffs. .. 20! 2... cece eee treet nee tr, loss of, in fasting, effect of, on metabolism.................... 90 energy of, in methane. ............... 000s eee e eee eee 310 MWTING ses arcs cities Saraang iaatinet ae omar eects has 312 Nature Of cig sas caK He osc seR ELSE Oe eden oN HUE DG FEET EYE 5 of body, composition of......... 0... cece cece eee eee 62, 65, 66 percentage of nitrogen in.... 22.0... eee eee 62, 65 organized. ........ hated a fate OMCs SUGRLAIS aca coe Beane ann eae maeae ase 82 percentage of nitrogen in.............. 0... cece eee eee 6, 62, 65 ratio of fat to, in body in fasting...................00005 88, 89, 90 real digestibility Of 04 suger eigen Ua aes Re OR ye ea 10 Storage; Cause: Oly. v's vs anainaciare ce ads perenne aay on cas eaey 102 extent Olecncvesceanesy couhes hee UR eR eee owe se wes 132 terminology Oli: = sxcciviwice sad ne see beste toe eee es eee a 6,7 Proteoses, formed from proteids............ 00. .c eee e eee eens 8, 12, 39 produced during digestion. ............. 000s cece e ee eee ees 12 Putrefaction of proteids in intestines. ............. 0.0 ec eee eee ee eee 44, 46 PLOCUCUS: Ohis..0 co awa ides eee 44, 46 Quotient, respiratory. . 2.2... ence nent e ene ees 74 change in, caused by work.................00005 212 computation from, of carbohydrates oxidized..... 76 fat oxidized. .............. 76 deductions from. ....... 0... eee eee eee eee 75 during work, conclusions from................5 75 effects of muscular exertion on..............00005 211 in fat-formation from carbohydrates............. 179 of carbohydrates. ... 2.2.0.0... 0c ccc ce eee eee 74 Fabio Gssctaie vex see un slgu eed aioe sa BO eed ee Sos 74 muscle. ....... HUAeaGA SS Hrathoaaanh Give vais 187 influence of contraction on............ 187 PIOLELOSs iy screen Had Baaneed AGS OY EES 74, 75 variations Of... 00.0... cece eee ene e eee eens 211 during work...............0.00005 216 Range; thermitss scu.ciacensanca cea gy wail aen deg espns bamiee be wee esa 348 Rate of nitrogen excretion. .......... cece cece cece eee n te eeeeeenne 98 Ration, maintenance. See Maintenance. Regulation of body temperature. .............. Sewmeeonaemneees 347, 348 INDEX. 607 PAGE Regulation of body temperature, chemical...............cceecceceeee 352 MEANS Of o ioiBee gouiuewemse 1s pehiad 348 PHYSICAL cs. sane ew wap vce sates os 351 emission Of heats. ou vs sas ex gale vn gels Peak eacncs oa aie 349 Rennet ferment, functions of........0. 00.0. c ec ccceccecucuccuccecs 40, 41 Replacement, isodynamic, law of............0.ccceceecececcuces 152, 399 isoglycosic, law Of......... 0.0. c ccc cece ceeenceeees 153, 399 routual, of fat and carbohydrates..................0.05 151 non-nitrogenous ingredients of feeding-stuffs... 154 THUGTIEDUSs ca x Hao van meeps Aas cute ee atone eon ey 148 of proteids by amides.... 2.2.0.0... 0.0 cc ce cceeeeeaee 53 ASPAPAGU 6 pated gp ticusps aiewr Scheme a sieeve 54 DOG yt: ccd es Ge dei ioretn alse den raune es 149 carbohydrates and fat of food............. 149 non-proteids. 0.02.0... cece ee cee eee ees 53 value of acetic acid... 2... cece eee eee eens 160 Dutyriciaeid sé siec ca als cued.e pew aiken dace 158 carbohydrates... 2.0.0... ee cece ee eee eee 152 Cellloses vice See ee dere eee cota eewkeleys 162 CGE ALEGRE wis. soe wae nee saene va ee seuss oa 161 lactic-aeids.c. ive neest meee cae tate et eaeekas 158 non-nitrogenous ingredients of feeding-stuffs..... 154 NUUrIEN tS yA salience Mawnan hace BAe eee dremectsaes 152 organic acids. 2... . eee cece eee eee 157 pentose carbohydrates. ...............2 cece 156 TRAMNOSC) 24s gee ees doh ee ooo wae cho eed Me 156 Residue, non-nitrogenous, of proteids.. ............... cece eee ee eee 48, 98 PAGE OP io Sype hss vie Siyark tsa Sintec Gone 49, 98 formation of sugar from..... 49, 50, 98 Resorption of carbohydrates... 1.0.2.2... cee eee eee ee sabtavg eigiieiee 12 BEX OSC sisi Seon tis eee SiG eats eave lo.alideate peasy 12,17 Tate Ofy sas saves ss de boy ee eee ees 18 Gextirose, rate Of. 64 do cee hese ae rao Heh SAGE Ea ite 18 PAGE pd, deal pe seg bee 6 ks Dirge eevee Oak AAO Reo dane. d Geaualo RoRRN se 12, 30 NON=PTOLvelds ii. vai ema emi de daa wee Mae pein TES EAE 12 protelds. 5 wucweis awed sew aie ace sud ee dhes edie yanemsenass 12 Respiration apparatus. . 0.0.0... eee eee n eee 69 determination of water by............-.....0-5 79 Pettenkofer type of............ 0.2 e eee eee 70 Regnault type of........... 0... cece ee ee ee eens 69 Guntzty pe Ofer ey signees evade gavecs te hea 72 Respiration-calorimeter. . ... 2.66.06. ccc cee eee ee 246, 248 Respiration, determination of products of..........-....see sere eee 69, 73 effects of muscular exertion on. ..........--00 eee reece ee 192 WOTK Of: sac seas daieie's Sais eas POR EL eke MSE Es 193, 341 608 INDEX. PAGE Respiratory exchange, determination of...............cescececeeeees 73 in intermediary metabolism...................5 405 Rest, reappearance of muscular glycogen in... ........-. cece ee eeees 23 Rhamnose, effect of, on total metabolism. ..............0. sce eeeeeee 156 replacement value Of............ cece cece cree een eenaee 156 Rice, utilization of energy of............- cece eee cence eee ce eeee 483, 491 Ruminants, utilization of energy in.............. cece ee eens 455, 461, 467 Sarkosin oxidized in body...... 2... 0. cess cece ee ec eee e cence eeeeees 53 Saponification of fat in digestion............. cece ec ee eee e cece eeees 12 Scheniatie DOV ews cscosiee ci gel Sa Silene a Basil n favbdcio due e tvecee Wy obeseieeetmnendve 60, 66 Shearing, influence of, on maintenance ration............... Pnvelereceraxerac 436 Size of animal, influence of, on efficiency of animal.................... 515 expenditure of energy in locomotion..... 516 heat production. .................0008- 359 in fasting.............. 359 maintenance ration. ..........eeee ee eee 440 relation of, to physiological activities. .............00005 368 Species, comparison of heat production of..........-. cece eee eeeeee 369 influence of, on efficiency of animal. ............... cece eee 515 expenditure of energy in locomotion............ 511 Speed, correction for, in work of locomotion..............00200085 507, 508 influence of, on expenditure of energy in locomotion. .... 507, 508, 513 utilization of energy in work............ 507, 513, 514 Standing, expenditure of energy in............. 2. cece eee ee eee 343, 499 Starch, as source of muscular energy.......... 0. cece eee e eee ee eee 199 digestible, gross energy Of............ ccc cece eeeeeeeeeeeeeee 306 metabolizable energy of............c0 eu ceeceee 324, 332 utilization of energy of............00.00008 475, 477, 490 effect of, on proteid metabolism.............. cece e eee eaee . 116 metabolizable energy of........... 0... cece eee cece 294, 297, 301 utilization of energy of............ 2.0.22 cece ee eee 473, 490, 491 States, initial and final, law of.......... 0... cece eect eee een eeeeee 228 Statistics of mUtTition. ... 6050 cews nese ee eea ees tee be was eevee enews 3 Storage of protein, extent of... 2.0.0... cece cece ee cee ete eens 132 GPANSILOPY s soiasicn dawn ey cok d eRoe dade Sed ees 96 4 CAMBCiOlie. ene Gehidaincny cide kwlgulnd hath ex ae 102 Straw, extracted, gross energy of carbohydrates of.................... 308 metabolizable energy of................ 290, 297, 300, 301 carbohydrates of............ 327 utilization of energy of...............00005 488, 490, 491 oat, metabolizable energy of..................005 290, 297, 300, 301 é PPOteiN OF, vs ia oe eae yea tele vw sees 321 carbohydrates of.. ..........0.00. 329 utilization of energy of......... 2... cece eee eee 485, 490, 491 wheat, metabolizable energy of..............0.05 290, 297, 300, 301 INDEX 609 PAGE Straw, wheat, metabolizable energy of proteinof..................... 321 , carbohydrates................. 329 utilization of energy of..........0. 0.0.0 ce eee 487, 490, 491 Sugar, effect of, on proteid metabolism................ Ieee ahgaere ana 116 formation of, from non-nitrogenous residue of proteids. ... . 49, 50, 98 proteids. ............ ccc cece ee eee 19, 21, 49, 50 in WV OM oitgas ss saa riage beat 18, 19, 21, 49, 50 Sulphur balance...........000.00.000 cece eee eee Ricleg amen ad satis oni 79 Sulphuric acid, conjugated,.in urine .........00.. 00. e cece eee eeees 46 production of, in metabolism of proteids................ 42 Surface of animal, computation of. ...........00.. 000.0 cece eee eee ees 364 relation’of heat production to...............0000005 359 internal work to... 2.2.0... 0... c cece ee 366 to work of digestion and assimilation... ... 408 Swine, utilization of energy by............ 00 cece eee e eee eee ee 452, 466 Temperature; bod ye :sc i. wscce ane acd oe bce eae aed bees AGeeald sane ane 347 regulation of..........-.-.-000005 ae aphebacan 347, 348 ChemiGal, cesaa ce paw vans eee x 352 MEANS Of sia's on ied's sian. cag Seid oe Mak see 348 Ph ysicalsats edge saxsercx Sones ees 351 CTRCIC SA 6 v5 iisceie Sees Satan SEG sas Sauce BR Me AG SE ncaa 353 method of heat emission above................-. 355 modification of conception of...............206- 357 influence of, on heat production................00.0000- 351 rate of emission of heat.................. 350 Thermal environment, critical... ...... 0.0... eee e eee eeee 358 influence of, on heat production in fasting....... 347 maintenance ration............. 435 utilization of energy............. 471 Thermie Tange. js cece ke dase: 4 bese ee egos aes be hacer sede eed eee 348 Thérmio=chemistry.::sss 0 sie:ss tes dds wah SE ka RK ES aOe S a ETE 228 Time element, influence of, on heat production. .....................- 439 maintenance ration...............-..0405 439 Timothy hay, metabolizable energy of..............-.+-- 287, 290, 297, 301 net availablity of energy of............02. eee ee eee 424, 428 FNSSUG HL. Scared ae Ro AOD Sdewinin Gace d netfee Gas he came eA ORNS s BIE Ba POSNER aS 59 active, fasting metabolism proportional to..............---- 86, 93 adipose......... iene ety Sey BIT El a ea ents taste eae ate 29 building, expenditure of energy in digestion, assimilation, and ... 491 lossiof nergy iD... gees. ee cease celles gscee sa see 444, 447 utilization of energy in. ................ 444, 447, 448, 461 by carnivora............. 448, 466 TONED ie se! aig: dos atinn seo sans a hcavn 451 ruminants........ 455, 461, 467 iy dig seeds wae vant 452, 466 610 INDEX. Tissue, building, utilization of energy in, earlier experimentson......... 460 effect of amount of food on .... 466 character of food on... 472 differences in live weight OMT Ata auc eta 457 thermal environment on 471 constant loss of, in fasting. . 2.2.0.2... 0... e eee eee eee eee 83 gain of potential energy in........ 2. cee cece eee eee ene 244 gains and ‘losses: Ofc auteescsinuaw eo aan yates nae a ee able eaas 59 determination of..............00cebeeeeees 60 mass of, relation of heat production to...................00eee 370 muscular, composition of......... 2... . 0s cee eee eee e ee eeee 63, 64 Peat LTS ars oh aes teeaugseadcen ae duniel eiatausniee asd aaeadeaveceeiee Speioe 63, 64 FLV COMET ANN ac erage 5 cssise Sid aydm dca tiendud dia Sane 6. 2 ance 4.8 TOS 64 heat of combustion of............. 20. c cece eceeee 63, 64 WORWS, MUSCULAR 2 osicos ct ak ee Ora reo RES eee sea san eee LOO influence of, on heat production..................04. 191 metabolism iN) 4.054 s0i oie ceh eyed bys wae ES Maw Red 190 WOrk Ofvssuxsicaes is dooes see eae E SY wee RE eee hs 341 Training, influence of, on utilization of energy in work................ 519 Transformation of energy in body.............. esse ites Sgbiauals. ad apie oe 2 muscular contraction... ...............005 495. Trot, expenditure of energy in locomotion at................. 509, 510, 514 utilization of energy in work at... 2... 0... ccc ee eee 509, 510 Tyrosin, formed from proteids............... 0c cece ence cece eee enees 39 Oxidized sin: Od Vie sirens g disnh nk ins ORGS eealgEdd Kew es MEE ORY 52 Units of heats 0004 easig es done Sas ee aweves MOSLs eRe s EMER EIS ces 232 measurement of energy... 1.2.0.0... cece cece cet eeeeeee 231, 233 Trees eid sites Sees ca SE wig See ee hE Reap Bape GE data dread og Gaane- ta & 42 ANLECEDEN LOLS a copes ares eases: econd seers BoerslacaaiaS auyahave aodde cd as eavans. ob lave ane 42 ammonium carbonate as............00cceeee ee ees 43 lactate AS... 1.6L ccc ce eee ene 43. as measure of proteid metabolism............ 0... .c cece ee eee ee 68. IN PeTSPIT AMON si scsi sess eeele dea eel aie eaalee’s aed dG adds 4a ees 48 production of, from amides............. 0.0.0 c cc eeeecee ee eeues 52 in metabolism... ......0..0..0.ccceeeececeuees 14,15 of proteids................ eee eee 42 UTC AC ess sisters tan Nad ale oma ttanty ce Sele eb Aauda¥ via miaelpare akeoe waa was 43 OMG Obie. sisal macaw Gaangie woaane se Maul deh a Doe eae 43 if! PersplTAlON.. ..acs7s wwencnes Sen eta awe dows Saale ice 48 UPINC). oe dace eyicnas Yl ei ne Siem e we ate Nine law Keates f kaise at 43 Urine, aromatic compounds in... ....... 0. ccc ee ccc ee cece een vceeees 46 computation of potential energy Of............0c cece eees 241, 313 conjugated sulphuric acid in............ seaman eae ie ielevenettre . 46 INDEX. ; 611 PAGE Urine, hippuric acid in. 0.0.0.0... cece cece cece cneccenccenccees 44 MERC O09... Brass nia aan Se valtnonh tas Dace ee eetehlate cae es aa Se 46 losses of energy-of protein in........... 0... ce cece ceceeeceees . 312 non-nitrogenous matter of... 20.0... cee cece ee eee 27, 312, 320 BMOUN OF. sis sspuysea wie eevee ete oe 28 derived from coarse fodders.......... 28 non-nitrogenous matter.. 321 influence of...............000000005 320 SOUTCEOL, 2 eile dona oaee ne oes 27, 321 PONbOSeS AN» bores ake ee teen See ye ads esas temmeertn 25, 26 Phenols ith esijes eustachian doees gelead ao epee mc ciaciona 27, 46 potential energy of.. 2.2.2... cece eee eee 272, 275, 278, 312 computation of...............002. 241, 277, 312 MUTUAL AN 5.0528 lage baa ern Ik avark alsa a rae Me Mia oa eelwad 43 Utilization of energy. See Energy. Wallies, isOdYNAMICH 5 sae os cas Seis eel dead os wees 6 aOR a ERE 397, 399 ISOBIY.COSLCs.5 So even ive Wins ore wa x foes ep aeeuasdg wads Medinet ewe 399, 400 replacement). sg ga a4 wisbe te Somes Ga ead, oid as aakaaaduseiea 4 396 modified conception of.................0ceeeeeee 405 Of nutrients. 0.0... ceed ee eee eae ee eee ws 396 Variations in heat production, causes of............ 0... c cece eee eee 363 Walking, consumption of oxygen in, by horse..................200005 505 expenditure of energy in, by horse...... 504, 506, 508, 510, 533, 539 utilization of energy in, by horse ............. 0 ces eeeeeeee 513 Water, consumption of, influence of, on heat production. .............. 438 maintenance ration............ 438 determination of, by respiration apparatus...................- 79 production of, in metabolism. ..................00000. 000 14,15 2 of carbohydrates... ./......... 23, 27 Dab: 12 50h, Cocpacuc uayionee Siaet econ cine 36 proteids. ..............0.-0 00. 42 Wheat gluten, digestible protein of, metabolizable energy of........ 310, 317 gross energy Of.....5..........-0-. 309 utilization of energy of......... 481, 491 metabolizable energy of. ..............202.05- 295, 297, 301 digestible matter of............ 301 utilization of energy of.......... ae aaah eae 480, 490, 491 straw, digestible carbohydrates of, metabolizable energy of...... 329 crude fiber of, metabolizable energy of..... 330, 332 matter of, gross energy Of...........00eeee00e 310 metabolizable energy of......... 300, 301 utilization of energy of.............. 487 protein of, metabolizable energy of.................. 321, 332 metabolizable energy of............ setae 290, 297, 300, 301 612 : INDEX, PAGE Wheat straw, utilization of energy of..............00005 461, 487, 490, 491 Wind, influence of, on heat emission..... Haus Dole weg ele miotras eer weacuura 357 Wool, composition: Off ccciec coe aus ses 4 2b HEG be See de ees oamRe ee aimee 63 Work. (See also Ewertion, muscular). ........c.cccccceccvcaecevcuce 226 Cellular: A oes vine ct ot wee ee eatin. donee eke ts sa eae 344 change in respiratory quotient caused by...........eeeeeeeeeee 212 coefficient of utilization in....... 1. cece eee cece e cence eens 498 disappearance of muscular glycogen in...........ccceeeeeeeees 23 gain of proteids during.............. cc cece eee e neces eeeeeee 204 glandular: os ccsosg 24s eee ease ea Ake padiaee Pee be sae es dae 343 internal .oscc3 gesee ss an ses Boe be FREE OER EH 24 4a 4K 336, 337 fasting heat production a measure Of..............2.5.- 344 muscular. ..............006. fe baad pavur Soars Begin woanshe shee Bi 341 relation of, to surface....... ideslaceticebeas ‘favelgns eat enerpte.d. Bets 366 kind of, influence of, on efficiency of animal..............00000- 512 mechanical, determination of...............cceeeeeesececeeaes 245 mouscular, disappearance of glycogen IN. .......... cece eee eeeee 23 incidental wc... so bee Sew das Sea ane ea Makes deme ees 342 net available energy for............ 020: cee cece eeeeeeeeeees 497 of ascent, consumption of oxygen in, by dog................... 500 COMTECHEM 2 sie ba ciaavenganihes deaibew os ins Make ae Maw 508 utilization of energy in. ........... cece ee eee 502, 503, 510 by dog. .......eceeeeceeeeees 502 NOMBO seit erdierae weeds cieaweticce 506 MOBY sda d suontece heise eKear ee 503 effect of grade on............. 512 load on.......... 509, 510 Circulation, . cases seenwees eanvs ieee ved eaves adaee dew c. 191, 341 descent....cciieecsaveess ves Esse cabudiee S iandetcaiG tenn, Seaendesvene Sxoel 8 509 influence of grade On. ........... 0c cece cece e eee ee 509 digestion and assimilation. .......... 80, 93, 337, 372, 376, 406, 493 above critical point............... 407 . below critical point............... 406 indirect utilization of heat from.... 406 AN MOB: 6: 5i scsi cameos xcated 2 ance 378 POPS 24's AP eevee ia veavea svagiensie si 385 TADS oo seild Gone 6s ak are Donnas os 382 methods of determining........... 377 OF DONG x. sia: gave hau soe wey oe 381 carbohydrates......... 379, 382, 384 Obs wiscmew sacs « 378, 382, 384, 385 s mixed diet... ........000 382, 384 proteids............... 381, 382, 384 relation of, to surface............6 408 INDEX. 613 draft, consumption of oxygen in, by dog.................008- 501 utilization of energy in...................005 502, 507, 513 BY ORs cesta esidiesca cee caouus 502 HOrSG 2-2 gcd accak eaeaie'e 2% 507, 513 Hearts sisaicaceieauasise cages eau eaw eaten ce eee ees 192, 341 locomotion, computation of. .......... 0.0. c cece eeeeeeeecens 512 consumption of oxygen in, by dog............. ... 500 horse. ............. 505 correction for speed in.. ...............0.005 507, 508 expenditure of energy in, by dog. ................ 500 horse. ... 504, 506, 508, 509 510, 514, 533, 539 utilization of energy in, computed................ 513 MUSCUlAY TONUS asc cases eae hg MEENA Peau Ree ede eek Sees 341 PESPITALION 6 4 ss. Ae tie gud contie Aneanvtsava donue doe aan nk Doatee 192, 341 standing. ...... Suva ad Gham aemerea pene nea S baiaeeuy ieee ama 343 VOlUNtArY- MUSCLES 6 fo side Mace a ett ais ea gece mwataateds 337 physiological 35 3... ante ddsies Geter euigw nd gawd eaves be cee 336 production, function of liver in .......... 0... cece eee e eee .. 206 relative value of nutrients in............0... eee eee 522 LOD og lahos saint steers 533 fat LOPss nev geiie-eaeaenee a Gere sata ea eb 522 influence of fatigue on. . ...........2000- 519 individuality on............- 517 kind of work on..........60- 512 size of animal on............ 515 species ON... 1... .. eee eee eee 515 speed on............ 507, 513, 514 training OD... 2.2... eee ee eee 519 metabolizable energy in..........-..-eeeeeeeeeeee 525 methods of determina- TOMS id owe sass ee 526, 528 614 INDEX. PAGE Work, utilization of metabolizable energy in, Wolff’s investigations. ..... 528 of feeding-stuffs in............ 540 fiber-free nutrients in 541, 543, 545, 547 net available energy in............cccceeeeecceees 497 variations of respiratory quotient during........... svensscaces, 216 SHORT-TITLE CATALOGUE OF THE PUBLICATIONS JOHN WILEY & SONS, New YORK. Loxrpon: CHAPMAN & HALL, Limrrep. ARRANGED UNDER SUBJECTS. Descriptive circulars sent on application. Books marked with an asterisk are sold at net prices only. All books are bound in cloth unless otherwise stated. AGRICULTURE. Armsby’s Manual of Cattle-feeding.................... 12mo, $1 75 Budd and Hansen’s American Horticultural Manual: Part I—Propagation, Culture, and Improvement....12mo, 1 50 Part II.—Systematic Pomology. (In preparation.) Downing’s Fruits and Fruit-trees of America.............. 8vo, 5 00 Grotenfelt’s Principles of Modern Dairy Practice. (Woll.)..12mo, 2 00 Kemp’s Landscape Gardening.............. cee eeee eee 12mo, 2 50 Maynard’s Landscape Gardening as Applied to Home Decoration. 12mo, 1 50 Sanderson’s Insects Injurious to Staple Crops............ 12mo, 1 50 ad Insects Injurious to Garden Crops. (In preparation.) re Insects Injuring Fruits. (In preparation.) Stockbridge’s Rocks and Soils......... eee cece ee eeee eens 8vo, 2 50 Woll’s Handbook for Farmers and Dairymen............. 1l6mo, 1 60 ARCHITECTURE. Baldwin’s Steam Heating for Buildings................ 12mo, 2 50 Berg’s Buildings and Structures of American Railroads....4to, 5 00 Birkmire’s Planning and Construction of American Theatres.8vo, 3 00 « Architectural Iron and Steel..............02000. 8vo, 3 50 BS Compound Riveted Girders as Applied in Buildings. 8vo,' 2 00 ze Planning and Construction of High Office Buildings. 8vo, 3 50 bid Skeleton Construction in Buildings.............. 8vo, 3 00 Briggs’s Modern American School Buildings............ 8vo, 4 00 Carpenter’s Heating and Ventilating of Buildings......... 8vo, 400 Freitag’s Architectural Engineering. 2d Edition, Rewritten.8vo, 3 50 me Fireproofing of Steel Buildings..............-. 8vo, 2 50 Gerhard’s Guide to Sanitary House-inspection............ 16mo, 1 00 s Theatre Fires and Panics.......0c.ceeeeeeees 12mo, 1 50 Hatfield’s American House Carpenter..........sseeeeeeee 8vo, 5 00 Holty’s Carpenters’ and Joiners’ Handbook.............. 18mo, 75 Kidder’s Architect’s and Builder’s Pocket-book..16mo, morocco, 4 00 Merrill’s Stones for Building and Decoration.............. 8vo, 5 00 _ Monckton’s Stair-building. ..........:. sees cece reece eeees 4to, 400 Patton’s Practical Treatise on Foundations.........-.-+++- 8vo, Siebert and Biggin’s Modern Stone-cutting and Masonry. .8vo, Snow’s punicipel Species of Wood: Their Characteristic Proper- ties. (In preparation. Wait’s Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence... Pins eep, “Law of Operations Preliminary to. Construction in En- gineering and Architecture............+.+-+s0++-- 8vo, Sheep, “ Law of Contracts...........c cece ceca cece tcccceees 8vo, Woodbury’s Fire Protection of Mills.........-.-..+seee0+> 8vo, Worcester and Atkinson’s Small Hospitals, Establishment and Maintenance, and Suggestions for Hospital Architecture, with Plans for a Small Hospital............-+.00+ 12mo, The World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893.......... Large 4to, ARMY AND NAVY. Bernadou’s Smokeless Powder, Nitro-cellulose, and the Theory of the Cellulose Molecule................0..... 12mo, * Bruff’s Text-book Ordnance and Gunnery............+... 8vo, Chase’s Screw Propellers and Marine Propulsion.......... 8vo, Craig’s Azimuth............ 0c cece e cee n cece ee ee eeeeenees 4to, Crehore and Squire’s Polarizing Photo-chronograph...... 8vo, Cronkhite’s Gunnery for Non-commissioned Officers..24mo, mor., * Davis’s Elements of Law............. cc cece cece cece oneness 8vo, * “ Treatise on the Military Law of United States. .8vo, ¢ Sheep, De Brack’s Cavalry Outpost Duties. (Carr.)....24mo, morocco, Dietz’s Soldier’s First Aid Handbook............16mo, morocco, * Dredge’s Modern French Artillery.......... 4to, half morocco, Durand’s Resistance and Populsion of Ships................8vo, * Dyer’s Handbook of Light Artillery.................. 12mo, Eissler’s Modern High Explosives...................00 8vo, * Fiebeger’s Text-book on Field Fortification........ Small 8vo, Hamilton’s The Gunner’s Catechism..............00 005 18mo, * Hoff’s Elementary Naval Tactic8.............0.e. ee seees 8vo, Ingalls’s Handbook of Problems in Direct Fire...,........ 8vo, es Ballistic Tables...............06% pieueitidhd, oe dsb wuooens 8vo, Lyons’s Treatise on Electromagnetic Phenomena.......... 8vo, * Mahan’s Permanent Fortifications. (Mercur.)..8vo, half mor., Manual for Courts-martial............. eee 16mo, morocco, * Mercur’s Attack of Fortified Places..................05 12mo, . “ Elements of the Art of War..............eee00. 8vo, Metcalf’s Cost of Manufactures—And the Administration of Workshops, Public and Private............ 8vo, * st Ordnance and Gunnery.............eeeeeeeee 12mo, Murray’s Infantry Drill Regulations.............. 18mo, paper, *Phelps’s Practical Marine Surveying.................. 8vo, Powell’s Army Officer’s Examiner................-.-000: 12mo, Sharpe’s Art of Subsisting Armies in War...... 18mo, morocco, Walke’s Lectures on Explosives................ceeeeeeee '.8v0, * Wheeler’s Siege Operations and Military Mining..........8vo, Winthrop’s Abridgment of Military Law................ 12mo, Woodhull’s Notes on Military Hygiene.................. 16mo, Young’s Simple Elements of Navigation........ 16mo, morocco, Second Edition, Enlarged and Revised...... 16mo, mor., mo aoc oo Nea AR ao oo SSS ee Ss STAT DO ae bp 1 1) [—) anonenoe coneuenegeonroon esssssssssss eesgzszssssssessyrssssseessss DEHN RHE AD TAT PNOEPNOP REE NROM ASSAYING. Fletcher’s Practical Instructions in Quantitative Assaying with the Blowpipe...............cccccee renee 12mo, morocco, Furman’s Manual of Practical Assaying.................- 8vo, Miller’s Manual of Assaying.................cceeeeeeees 12mo, O’Driscoll’s Notes on the Treatment of Gold Ores.......... 8vo, Ricketts and Miller’s Notes on Assaying.................- 8vo, Wilson’s Cyanide Processes.............0ee ee eeeeec eens 12mo, ee Chlorination Process.............cccceeceeeeee 12mo, ASTRONOMY. Craig's. AZIMUth 6: saccsiaaiie aa santa slovaaien- esse henna 4to, Doolittle’s Treatise on Practical Astronomy...............- 8vo, Gore’s Elements of Geodesy... ........ 0. ccc cee eee ee ees 8vo, Hayford’s Text-book of Geodetic Astronomy.............. 8vo, Merriman’s Elements of Precise Surveying and Geodesy... .8vo, * Michie and Harlow’s Practical Astronomy.............- 8vo, * White’s Elements of Theoretical and Descriptive Astronomy. 12mo, BOTANY. Baldwin’s Orchids of New England................. Small 8vo, Davenport’s Statistical Methods, with Special Reference to Bio- logical Variation..................204. 16mo, morocco, Thomé and Bennett’s Structural and Physiological Botany. 16mo, Westermaier’s Compendium of General Botany.(Schneider.) 8vo, CHEMISTRY. Adriance’s Laborutory Calculations and Specific Gravity ee m0, Allen’s Tables for Iron Analysis...........0.-eeeeseeeeees 8vo, Arnold’s Compendium of Chemistry. (Mandel.) (In preparation.) Austen’s Notes for Chemical Students...............+++ 12mo, Bernadou’s Smokeless Powder.—Nitro-cellulose, and Theory of the Cellulose Molecule. ............ cece cece eeenes 12mo, Bolton’s Quantitative Analysis............ss eee cece eens 8vo, Brush and Penfield’s Manual of Determinative Mineralogy...8vo, Classen’s Quantitative Chemical Analysis by Electrolysis. (Her- rick—Boltwood.) . 2.2... 2. ccs ccs e eee een ee ee eens 8vo, Cohn’s Indicators and Test-papers.........-.+e-eeeeeeeee 12mo, Craft’s Short Course in Qualitative Chemical Analysis. (Schaef- 5) ee ee ce eee ee 12mo, Drechsel’s Chemical Reactions. (Merrill.)............+- 12mo, Fissler’s Modern High Explosives........-.-+..sseseeeeeee 8vo, Effront’s Enzymes and their Applications. (Prescott.)....8vo, Erdmann’s Introduction to Chemical Preparations. ee m0, Fletcher’s Practical Instructions in Quantitative Assaying with i the Blowpipe..........--c+ eee ceeeeeeees 12mo, morocco, Fowler’s Sewage Works Analyses..........--2--eeseees 12mo Fresenius’s Manual of Qualitative Chemical Analysis. (Wells.) 8vo, at Manual of Qualitative Chemical Analysis. Part I. Descriptive. (Wells.).......... ida ne Wak a6 8vo System of Instruction in Quantitative Chemical Analysis, (Allen.)... ..------+s.eeeeeeees 8vo, 3 mm 09 DO OO anoooon eooooooo 3 50 4 00 2 50 3 00 2 50 3 00 2 00 1 50 1 26 2 25 2 00 1 25 3 00 6 00 Fuertes’s Water and Puplic Health..............02seee0% 12mo, Furman’s Manual of Practical Assaying.............+++++- 8vo, Gill’s Gas and Fuel Analysis for Engineers.............. 12mo, Grotenfelt’s Principles of Modern Dairy Practice. (Woll.)..12mo, Hammarsten’s Text-book of Physiological Chemistry. (Mandel.) 8vo, Helm’s Principles of Mathematical Chemistry. (Morgan.) 12mq, Hinds’s Inorganic Chemistry. ............. cee eeeneees 8vo, * “ Laboratory Manual forS .dents..............- 12mo, Holleman’s Text-book of Inorganic Chemistry. (Cooper.)...8vo, * « « —“ Organic “ (Walker and Mott.) (In preparation.) Hopkins’s Oil-chemists’ Handbook.............e0eeeeecees 8vo, Keep’s Cast Iron........cccecee cece cece rece ceeseenetenne 80, Ladd’s Manual of Quantitative Chemical Analysis........ 12mo, Landauer’s Spectrum Analysis. (Tingle.).............+.++ 8vo, Nn WYP Deore Sasss SRSs 3 00 Lassar-Cohn’s Practical Urinary Analysis. (Lorenz.) (In preparation.) Leach’s The Inspection and Analysis of Food with Special Refer- ence to State Control. (In preparation.) Léb’s Electrolysis and Electrosynthesis of Organic Compounds. (TOTEM SE) ss esata taseisa cas aeieg tiara w Gree win ous aclorertiva Aa Sasori foe 12mo, Mandel’s Handbook for Bio-chemical Laboratory...... 12mo, Mason’s Water-supply. (Considered Principally from a Sani- tary Standpoint.) 3d Edition, Rewritten...... 8vo, “ Examination of water. (Chemical and Bacterio- logical.) sscsseus oss ccorseeats Gres NeEarRwnN SSSSS3S S88 ro oom 2 $38 oa Standpoint. aid Gcbca agra isiGlerdns ciel karate «es MESES S a Merriman’s Treatise on Hydraulics............c.ccceeeeee 8vo, * Michie’s Elements of Analytical Mechanics. kn o's Siartieiteste. 3 8vo, Schuyler’s Reservoirs for Irrigation, Water-power, and Domestic Water-supply...cssecsssiseesces aencceeess rge 8vo, Turneaure and Russell. Public Water-supplies............ Ae Wegmann’s Design and Construction of Dams............ Se ie supely of the City of New York from 1658 to nding sebioia heh CBT aatnvenids 4S 6 Siarectiarata nes 2.Oe 4to, Weisbach’s Hydraulics and Hydraulic Motors. (Du Bois.) . -8v0, Wilson’s Manual of Irrigation Engineering.......... Small 8vo, Wolff's Windmill as a Prime Mover..............cccceeee 8vo0, Wood's Turbines: so. cise cs nsicaae cs savsieesceennaasans 8vo, “Elements of Analytical Mechanics................. 8vo, MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING. Baker’s Treatise on Masonry Construction.............. 8vo, Black’s United States Public Works.............. Oblong 4to, Bovey’s Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures. . .8vo, Burr’s rains and Resistance of the Materials of Engineer- DTN savor ig ce dca 08 aves etbvcis wei OW ote ia a s's GARG OWE sb i wlarele'e 9» BVO, Byrne’s Highway Construction.’................ceeeeceeee 8vo, ‘ Inspection of the Materials and Workmanship Em- ployed in Construction................0.0-0- 16mo, Church’s Mechanics of Engineering...................00- 8vo, Du Bois’s Mechanics of Engineering. Vol. I........ Small 4to, Johnson’s Materials of Construction............... Large &vo, Reep’s: Cast: Tron... 2. cae ccsawieweees esisceceeeoens 8vo, Lanza’s Applied Mechanics. .............cccee cece eeseees 8vo, Martens’s Handbook on Testing Materials. (Henning.).2 v., 8vo, Merrill’s Stones for Building and Decoration............... 8vo, Merriman’s Text-book on the Mechanics of Materials...... 8vo, Merriman’s Strength of Materials...................... 12mo, Metcalf’s Steel. A Manual for Steel-users............... 12mo, Patton’s Practical Treatise on Foundations................ 8vo, Rockwell’s Roads and Pavements in France............ 12mo, Smith’s Wire: Its Use and Manufacture............ Small 4to, “Materials of Machines,.................+-0004- 12mo, Snow’s Principal Species of Wood: Their Characteristic Proper- ties. (In preparation.) ' Spalding’s Hydraulic Cement. ........c.escee eee eee eee 12mo, Text-book on Roads and Pavements.......... 12mo, Thurston’s Materials of Engineering.............. 3 Parts, 8vo, Part I—Non-metallic Materials of Engineering and Metal- Taney cs esc aston o5)5 0 wie ram sie 9 Sesscolnls 3.5 ated Sessorsiate tine et Abe Part I1.—Tron and Steel........... ce eeee cee er ee eneeeee Part III.—A Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes and Other Aitoys and Their Constituents...............0ceeceeeeeee 8vo, Thurston’s Text-book of the Materials of Construction..... 8vo, Tillson’s Street Pavements and Paving Materials.......... 8vo, Waddell’s De Pontibus. (A Pocket-book for Bridge Engineers.) 16mo, morocco, ee Specifications for Steel Bridges................ 12mo, Wood’s Treatise on the Resistance of Materials, and an Ap- pendix on the Preservation of Timber.......... 8vo, = Elements of Analytical Mechanics............. -.. .8V0, i q » Soe aan S838ss S88 388 HOH ANH PRANNMWANIABAWS AGT WAH SSRsSSssssSSsssss Bs SBE moO moO ch aDnorp S383 &S 8388 SS 83E oe bo RAILWAY ENGINEERING. 1ndrews’s Handbook for Street Railway (Engineers. 3x5 in. mor., 1 ae serg’s Buildings and Structures of American Railroads. ..4to, Brooks’s Handbook of Street Railroad Location..16mo, morocco, Butts’s Civil Engineer’s Field-book............ 16mo, morocco, Crandall’s Transition Curve.............200005 16mo, morocco, “f Railway and Other Earthwork Tables........ 8vo, Dawson’s Electric Railways and Tramways.Small 4to, half mor., = “Engineering” and Electric Traction Pocket-book. 16mo, morocco, Dredge’s History of the Pennsylvania Railroad: (1879.).Paper, ® Drinker’s Tunneling, Explosive Compounds, and Rock Drills. 4to, half morocco, Fisher’s Table of Cubie Yards...................5- Cardboard, Godwin’s Railroad Engineers’ Field-book and Explorers’ Guide. 16mo, morocco, Howard’s Transition Curve Field-book......... 16mo, morocco, Hudson’s Tables for Calculating the Cubie Contents of Exca- vations and Embankments.............--..0-00005 8vo, Nagle’s Field Manual for Railroad Engineers. ...16mo, morocco, Philbrick’s Field Manual for Engineers........ 16mo, morocco, Pratt and Alden’s Street-railway Road-bed............... 8vo, Bearles’s Field Engineering................++.+ 16mo, morocco, it Railroad Spiral.............-...-..4. 16mo, morocco, Taylor’s Prismoidal Formule and Earthwork............. 8vo, * Trautwine’s Method of Calculating the Cubic Contents of Ex- ae Saas and Embankments by the Aid of Dia- aus sa Suey apavabasasrsnueded 28 aewtaoe ord wea eneaes 8vo, : a The Field Practice of Laying Out Circular Curves for Railroads. ............c0e00- 12mo, morocco, bed - Cross-section Sheet.......c.ceccecesceeees Paper, Webb’s Railroad Construction..................0.e0 ee eee 8vo, Wellington’s Economie Theory of the Location of Railways. . Small 8vo, DRAWING. Barr’s Kinematics of Machinery...........2-.seeeeeeeeves 8vo, * Bartlett’s Mechanical Drawing............cceeeeeceeeers 8vo, Coolidge’s Manual of Drawing..............00000- 8vo, paper, Durley’s Elementary Text-book of the Kinematics of Machines. (In preparation.) Hill’s Text-book on Shades and Shadows, and Perspective. .8vo, Jones’s Machine Design: Part I—Kinematies of Machinery................00200: 8vo, Part I1.—Form, Strength and Proportions of Parts...... 8vo, MacCord’s Elements of Descriptive Geometry............6: 8vo, i Kinematics; or, Practical Mechanism.......... 8vo, Mechanical Drawing...............seeeeeeeeeee 4to, “ Velocity Diagrams. ............ ccc e eee cece ee eee 8vo, *Mahan’s Descriptive Geometry and Stone-cutting....... 8vo, Mahan’s Industrial Drawing. (Thompson.)................ 8vo, Reed’s Topographical Drawing and Sketching.............. 4to, Reid’s Course in Mechanical Drawing...................-. 8vo, “ Text-book of Mechanical Drawing and Elementary Ma- Chine Desigtivcs co 6 sisisiegivewicv ec cisieaie seein gears 8vo, Robinson’s Principles of Mechanism....................-. 8vo, 8 alls) an oo i et GO DO 09 6O SSSSSSs a - bw WD S$ sks & 1 02 bo sss S "Be NOW HRW 88 S3SSS3sSses Smith’s Manual of Topographical Drawing. (McMillan.).8vo, 2 50 Warren’s Elements of Plane and Solid Free-hand Geometrical Drawing asidie ss itcae ss cens ces acenawouae 12mo, 1 00 spective of Form and Shadow.............. 12mo, 1 00 a Plane Problems in Elementary Geometry....... 12mo, 1 25 i Primary Geometry.............c cece ee ec cues 12mo, 75 es Elements of Descriptive Geometry, Shadows, and Per- BPECUIVE: ace ssa Mees Astras os bens mewsemnd < 8vo, 3 50 se General Problems of Shades and Shadows....... 8vo, 3 00 Elements of Machine Construction and Drawing..8vo, 7 50 Problems, Theorems, and Examples in Descriptive GeOMELEY sae sc decais concise Maine ices, ens agaudwieae ea 8vo, 2 50 Weisbach’s Kinematics and the Power of Transmission. (Herr- Inann: and: Klein.) - 2.55 esiecciegicse aap $34 45 BdDee ee 8vo, 5 00 Whelpley’s Practical Instruction in the Art of Letter En- OTAVING wns ce ae yee ome aeiiey a igri et eewaluedee 12mo, 2 00 Wilson’s Topographic Surveying. .............ccceeceeees 8vo, 3 50 Wilson’s Free-hand Perspective............cceseeceeeeee 8vo, 2 50 Woolf’s Elementary Course in Descriptive Geometry..Large 8vo, 3 00 ELECTRICITY AND PHYSICS. Anthony and Brackett’s Text-book of Physics. (Magie.) Small 8vo, 3 00 Anthony’s Lecture-notes on the Theory of Electrical Measur- AMOS) jest. oss dha Sustare ss Ca Veisiainiccale 5 st eree W sels e Seat 12mo, 1 00 Benjamin’s History of Electricity...............0.-00-- 8vo, 3 00 Benjamin’s Voltaic Cell........... cece eee eee cee ene eneees 8vo, 3 00 Classen’s Qantitative Chemical Analysis by Electrolysis. Her- Tick and Boltwood.)...........cccc ec cees eee eecees 8vo, 3 00 Crehore and Squier’s Polarizing Photo-chronograph...... 8vo, 3 00 Dawson’s Electric Railways and Tramways..Small 4to, half mor., 12 50 Dawson’s “Engineering” and Electric Traction Pocket-book. 16mo, morocco, 4 00 Flather’s Dynamometers, and the Measurement of Power..12mo, 3 00 Gilbert’s De Magnete. (Mottelay.)..........cecceeeeeees 8vo, 2 50 Holman’s Precision of Measurements. ............++eeeeeee 8vo, 2 00 “ Telescopic Mirror-scale Method, Adjustments, and POSES: iduaie's ons cececusiany Secmvasnnareds sees em Large 8vo, 75 Landauer’s Spectrum Analysis. (Tingle.)...............+ 8vo, 3 00 Le Chatelier’s High-temperature Measurements. (Boudouard— Burgess.) ....0csccececectcecsseesaceccensescees 12mo, 3 00 L&b’s Electrolysis and Electrosynthesis of Organic Compounds. (Lorenz.) ...2csccce ccs cce sees ease tenarccesncece 12mo, 1 00 Lyone’s Treatise on Electromagnetic Phenomena.... - Bi dae sas 8vo, 6 00 *Michie. Elements of Wave Motion Relating to Sound and Light 2.00... cece cece ener eee c eee n eee ec tence ee eeneas 8vo, 4 00 Niaudet’s Elementary Treatise on Electric Batteries (Fish- back:):.: sneeiewec 6 cee ss ARE Nes eh G ee ao neays 12mo, 2 50 *® Parshall and Hobart’s Electric Generators..Small 4to, half mor., 10 00 Ryan, Norris, and Hoxie’s Electrical Machinery. (in preparation.) Thurston’s Stationary Steam-engines....... fesdiis abd Wis Sele ds 8vo, 2 50 * Tillman. Elementary Lessons in Heat.............-.- 8vo, 1 50 Tory and Pitcher. Manual of Laboratory Physics..Small 8vo, 2 00 9 * Davis. Elements of Law..........ccecc cece ee ceereeecs 8vo, =. ah Treatise on the Military Law of United States. .8vo, * Sheep, Manual for Courts-martial.................++ 16mo, morocco, Wait’s Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence... a eep, “Law of Operations Preliminary to Construction in En- gineering and Architecture. ..........0eeceeeee: 8vo, Sheep, “ Law of Contracts......... cee es ce nerecnccesccass 8v0, Winthrop’s Abridgment of Military Law.............. 12mo, MANUFACTURES. Beaumont’s Woollen and Worsted Cloth Manufacture. ...12mo, Bernadou’s Smokeless Powder—Nitro-cellulose and Theory of the Cellulose Molecule..............scceeeccecees 12mo, Bolland’s Iron Founders os sieves eves sc aserewwes ]2mo, cloth, “The Iron Founder” Supplement.............- 12mo, “c Encyclopedia of Founding and Dictionary of Foundry Terms Used in the Practice of Moulding. ...12mo, Kissler’s Modern High Expiosives...............0eeeeeee 8vo, Effront’s Enzymes and their Applications. (Prescott.)...8vo, Fitzgerald’s Boston Machinist..............0.eeeeeeeeee 18mo, Ford’s Boiler Making for Boiler Makers.............. 18mo, Hopkins’s Oil-chemists’ Handbook..... read are: aomraveveleraat wore; Sve 8v0, Keep’s: Cast [roti oii ccccsieiecies tice tticene cess auien esiee aces 8vo0 Leach’s The Inspection and Analysis of Food with Special Reference to State Control. (In preparation.) Metcalf’s Steel. A Manual for Steel-users.............. 12mo, Metcalf’s Cost of Manufactures—And the administration of Workshops, Public and Private Meyer’s Modern Locomotive Construction................. * Reisig’s Guide to Piece-dyeing................0-0-eeeeee Smith’s Press-working of Metals............-cceeeseeeees 8 “ Wire: Its Use and Manufacture............ Spalding’s Hydraulic Cement..................ce eee eeee Spencer’s Handbook for Chemists of Beet-sugar Houses. 16mo, morocco, Handbook for Sugar Manufacturers and their Chem- 6c ARES sieve interests tacos Aievacvatineorencetsiaibta 16mo, morocco, Thurston’s Manual of Steam-boilers, their Designs, Construc- tion and Operation. ............ cece cece ee nee n oneness Walke’s Lectures on Explosives..............0cccceeeeaes West’s American Foundry Practice.......... anes “ “Moulder’s Text-book..........2.ceceeseececcenes : Wiechmann’s Sugar Analysis..............ceeeeees Small 8vo, Wolff’s Windmill as a Prime Mover.............-....0005 8vo, Woodbury’s Fire Protection of Mills..................... 8vo, MATHEMATICS. ; Baker’s Elliptic Functions. ...............cccueeeeeeeeeees 8vo, * Bass’s Elements of Differential Calculus............... 12mo, Briggs’s Elements of Plane Analytic Geometry.......... 12mo, Chapman’s Elementary Course in Theory of Equations. ..12mo, Compton’s Manual of Logarithmic Computations........ 12mo, 10 > noe POON BSH aW $3338 S8SssSs Nwrerwpeo prnre S8SSSS3 SSS § ix) NWONNDNRaA NH OO NWWAoM SZSS383 8 8 BSSS8SS & — at et ee $3338 ’ *Dickson’s College Algebra...................... Large 12mo, Halsted’s Elements of Geometry. ....... ccc cece ceescens 8vo, re Elementary Synthetic Geometry............... 0, pap., 100 copies for Mounted on heavy cardboard, 8 X 10 inches, 10 copies for Elementary Treatise on the Integral Calculus. Small 8vo, = Curve Tracing in Cartesian Co-ordinates...... 12mo, y Treatise on Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations .............c cc cece cece cee Small 8vo, ie Theory of Errors and the Method of Least SQUSTES oe cccetiae gana latnaeere sec xavtrottiae dn 12mo, * « Theoretical Mechanics.................... .--12mo, Laplace’s Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. (Truscott and MOBY 3 )esa Sem aetnahteng:ts cote anhiant ae Meh n aoe ten cal ig a hea 12mo, * Ludlow and Bass. Elements of Trigonometry and Logarith- mic and Other Tables................e ce ceececuaee 8vo, « Trigonometry. Tables published separately. .Each, Merriman and Woodward. Higher Mathematics.......... 8vo, Merriman’s Method of Least Squares.................2. VO, Rice and Johnson’s Elementary Treatise on the Differential Calculus ..........e0eeeeeee Small 8vo, “ Differential and Integral Calculus. 2 vols. ID) (ONG. siiein s 4 partied tees kntsaxe Small 8vo, Wood’s Elements of Co-ordinate Geometry................ 8vo, “ Trigometry: Analytical, Plane, and Spherical... .12mo, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING, STEAM ENGINES AND BOILERS. Baldwin’s Steam Heating for Buildings.................. 12mo, Barr’s Kinematics of Machinery.............0.0ceeceeee 8vo, * Bartlett’s Mechanical Drawing.................-eeee0es 8vo, Benjamin’s Wrinkles and Recipes...............0-e0005 12mo, Carpenter’s Experimental Engineering.................... 8vo, id Heating and Ventilating Buildings........... 8vo, Clerk’s Gas and Oil Engine....................--4-- Small 8vo, Coolidge’s Manual of Drawing..................5. 8vo, paper, Cromwell’s Treatise on Toothed Gearing....................12mo, “i Treatise on Belts and Pulleys............... 12mo, Durley’s Elementary Text-book of the Kinematics of Machines. (In preparation.) Flather’s Dynamometers, and the Measurement of Power ..12mo, ee Rope Driving............ a cdi shavtuauaand snaaie-aubrdneiaauea 12mo, Gill’s Gas an Fuel Analysis for Engineers.............. 12mo, Hall’s Car Lubrication. ......... 2... ccc ccc cece eee nea 12mo, Jones’s Machine Design: Part I.—Kinematies of Machinery...................... 8vo, Part II.—Form, Strength and Proportions of Parts...... 8vo, Kent’s Mechanical Engineers’ Pocket-book....16mo, morocco, Kerr’s Power and Power Transmission.................. 8vo, j? ee aw TN wo mbpop 69 Non w no wr eer Po bo OO DD bo OL eo mm DO oD MacCord’s Kinematics; or, Practical Mechanism.......... 8vo, © Mechanical Drawing. ......cececcccceceeeeeees 4to, ne Velocity Diagrams. .........eseeccesencecvece 8vo, Mahan’s Industrial Drawing. (Thompson.).............+- 8vo, Poole’s Calorifie Power of Fuels.........cccccecsccccceces 8vo, Reid’s Course in Mechanical Drawing..............+.-++0- 8vo, “ Text-book of Mechanical Drawing and Elementary Machine Design............ cece cree ec ceerenee 8 Richards’s Compressed Air . Robinson’s Principles of Mechanism Smith’s Press-working of Metals..............eeceeeeeees Thurston’s Treatise on Friction and Lost Work in Machin- ery and Mill Work................. 0c ee eeeee 8vo, Animal as a Machine and Prime Motor and the Laws of Energetics...............000eeeeee 12mo, Warren’s Elements of Machine Construction and Drawing. .8vo, Weisbach’s Kinematics and the Power of Transmission. (Herr- “ mann—Klein.): sccn pecans see csewnecnsawes sce 8vo, = Machinery of Transmission and Governors. (Herr- mann—Klein:): wccceseesssses ste mcewe vies ee os 8vo, os Hydraulics and Hydraulic Motors. (Du Bois.) . aro Wolff’s Windmill as a Prime Mover..............002ee0e. 8vo, Wood’s Turbines. ......... cc cece ccc cece cence ececeeece 8vo0, MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING. Bovey’s Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures. .8vo, Burr's Elasticity and Resistance of the Materials of pence LY See ee cero Seay eer ne ere VO, Church’s Mechanics of Engineering Sle aale Niislaverdiveioiewietsie’n e504 8vo, Jobnson’s Materials of Construction............. ’,.Large 8vo, Keep’s Cast Iron. ...... csc cece cece etre cect eeennsennes 8vo, Lanza’s Applied Mechanics..............seecceeeuceceeens 8vo, Martens’s Handbook on Testing Materials. (Henning.)....8vo, Merriman’s Text-book on the Mechanics of Materials... .8vo, ry Strength of Materials.................0200% 12mo, Metcalf’s Steel. A Manual for Steel-users.............- 12mo, Smith’s Wire: Its Use and Manufacture............. Small 4to, «Materials of Machines.............0eeeeeeeeens 12mo, Thurston’s Materials of Engineering.............. 3 vols., 8vo, Part Il.—Iron and Steel...........ecceeseecnccceeences 8v0 Part ITI—A Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes and Other ‘Miloye and their Constituents. ............ cc ceee ee eeenees 8vo, Thurston’s ‘Text-book of the Materials of Construction. ...8vo, Wood’s Treatise on the Resistance of Materials and an Ap- pendix on the Preservation of Timber.......... 8v0, «Elements of Analytical Mechanics................ 8vo, STEAM ENGINES AND BOILERS. Carnot’s Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat. (Thurston.) 12mo, Dawson’s “ Engineering ” and Electric Traction Pocket-book. ‘ 16mo, morocco, Ford’s Boiler Making for Boiler Makers................ 18mo, Goss’s Locomotive Sparks......... 0... cc ee cece ee ceeeees 8vo, Hemenway’s Indicator Practice and Steam-engine Economy. 2mo, Hutton’s Mechanical Engineering of Power Plants........ 8v0, se Heat and Heat-engines............. ccc eeceeeees 8vo, pong T Te ww WHR wow eH POH S8ss 8s wer TAD WOH WNeRNANNAQM TW S88 SS SSsssssssssss aan Net 8838 S83s8se =) acs oo a —) 3 eos ooo S38 Kent’s Steam-boiler Economy...............ccceceeeecees 8vo, 4 00 7 . ? Kneass’s Practice and Theory of the Injector.............. 8vo, 1 50 MacCord’s Slide-valves............ccseeeeec cece 8vo, 2 00 Meyer’s Modern Locomotive Construction................ 4to, 10 00 Peabody’s Manual of the Steam-engine Indicator......... 12mo, 1 50 es Tables of the Properties of Saturated Steam and Other Vapors............... ccc ccecceeeceees 8vo, 1 00 “Thermodynamics of the Steam-engine and Other Heat-engines ..... 0... ec ccc ccc cee cen senvces 8vo, 5 00 ry Valve-gears for Steam-engines.............0..0. 8vo, 2 50 Peabody and Miller. Steam-boilers...................... 8vo, 4 00 Pray’s Twenty Years with the Indicator............ Large 8vo, 2 50 Pupin’s Thermodynamics of Reversible Cycles in Gases and Saturated Vapors. (Osterberg.)..........cccceee 12mo, 1 25 Reagan’s Locomotive Mechanism and Engineering. ..... 12mo, 2 00 Rontgen’s Principles of Thermodynamics. (Du Bois.)... -8vo, 5 00 Sinclair’s Locomotive Engine Running and Management. -12mo, 2 00 Smart’s Handbook of Engineering Laboratory Practice..12mo, 2 50 Snow’sa Steam-boiler Practice. .... rac ava atid tea tate nog tecateeramaugaeats vo, 3 00 Spangler’s Valve-gears..............ccececcecsccccencens 8vo, 2 50 es Notes on Thermodynamics................... 12mo, 1 00 Thurston’s Handy Tables..............cccececacccceceecs 8vo, 1 50 “ Manual of the Steam-engine.......... 2 vols., 8vo, 10 00 Part I.—History, Structure, and Theory................ 8vo, 6 00 Part I1.—Design, Construction, and Operation.......... 8vo, 6 00 Thurston’s Handbook of Engine and Boiler Trials, and the Use of the Indicator and the Prony Brake........ 8vo, 5 00 Stationary Steam-engines................0008- 8vo, 2 50 ae Steam-boiler Explosions in Theory and in Prac- TGS so yon aiedige Henin Saws ied mabe a xe Sees 12mo, 1 50 « Manual of Steam-boilers, Their Designs, Construc- tion, and Operation................c..cce0. 8vo, 5 00 Weisbach’s Heat, Steam, and Steam-engines. (Du Bois.)..8vo, 5 00 Whitham’s Steam-engine Design. ...............0cccceeee 8vo, 5 00 Wilson’s Treatise on Steam-boilers. (Flather.).......... l6mo, 2 50 Wood’s Thermodynamics, Heat Motors, and Refrigerating MaGDINES: +5256 os corsdasre Risa. SU endene she eaaaees 8vo, 4 00 MECHANICS AND MACHINERY. Barr’s Kinematics of Machinery................cceeeeees 8vo, 2 50 Bovey’s Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures..8vo, 7 50 Chordal.—Extracts from Letters........... svanw ee siele's ecstas 12mo, 2 60 Church’s Mechanics of Engineering................00000: 8vo, 6 00 “ Notes and Examples in Mechanics............. 8vo, 2 00 Compton’s First Lessons in Metal-working.............. 12mo, 1 50 Compton and De Groodt. The Speed Lathe.............. 12mo, 1 50 Cromwell’s Treatise on Toothed Gearing................ 12mo, 1 50 ee Treatise on Belts and Pulleys................ 12mo, 1 50 Dana’s Text-book of Elementary Mechanics for the Use of Colleges and Schools. ............... 2c cece ee eeeee 1 50 Dingey’s Machinery Pattern Making wT 2 00 Dredge’s Record of the Transportation Exhibits Building of the World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893..... 4to, half mor., 5 00 Du Bois’s Elementary Principles of Mechanics: ; Vols, L.—K tmematits - 6 ioiaie:so:aie's :s'eisisiinesa oe isacceiseis o's 5 ebalene 8vo, 3 50 Vol; Th —Statiescssis sc scecews osc eawewws te cewele wen ee ias 8vo, 4 00 Vol, TIE:-—Kineties...23 sasccaec ses wawae ne vs eaemiade ss aay 8vo, 3 50 Du Bois’s Mechanics of Engineering. Vol. I........ Small 4to, 7 50 «o « “ “s VolII........ Small 4to, 10 00 13 Durley’s Elementary Text-book of the Kinematics of Machines. (In preparation.) Fitzgerald’s Boston Machinist.............cscceeecceees 16mo, Flather’s Dynamometers, and the Measurement of Power.12mo, ite Rope Driving........-.-ccecccsccececscscncee 12mo, Goss’s Locomotive Sparks............ccecccecccececenscees 8vo, Hall’s Car Lubrication. .............. cece sicterererere Sa ayeys 12mo, Holly’s Art of Saw Filing. ...........eeeeeee age Uieie ie iann 18mo, * Johnson’s Theoretical Mechanics............ceceeeeees 12mo, Johnson’s Short Course in Statics by Graphic and Algebraic Methods. (In preparation.) Jones’s Machine Design: Part 1—Kinematics of Machinery............2.002e000: 8vo, Part II1—Form, Strength and Proportions of Parts... .8vo, Kerr’s Power and Power Transmission........... seve et 8vo, Lanza’s Applied Mechanics. .............ccseccececceseee 8vo, MacCord’s Kinematics; or, Practical Mechanism.......... 8vo, ad Velocity Diagrams.............ceceecceeeenes 8vo, Merriman’s Text-book on the Mechanics of Materials...... 8vo, * Michie’s Elements of Analytical Mechanics.............. 8vo, Reagan’s Locomotive Mechanism and Engineering....... 12mo, Reid’s Course in Mechanical Drawing...................- 8vo, “ Text-book of Mechanical Drawing and Elementary Machine Design...........cccceuceceaee OES eialeere 8vo, Richards’s Compressed Air.........c.cccececccccecccecs 12mo, Robinson’s Principles of Mechanism...............0.ee00+ 8vo, oOo eNNW-e Sasssss —E—— Tr) essesgasss Oe O&O NNPRE AUN Oe S383 Ryan, Norris, and Hoxie’s Electrical Machinery. (In preparation.) Sinclair’s Locomotive-engine Running and Management. .12mo, Smith’s Press-working of Metals............ccecceceeeee BVO, “Materials of Machines..................00000 12mo, Thurston’s Treatise on Friction and Lost Work in Machin- ery and Mill Work.........cccsecsscsecees 8v0, * Animal as a Machine and Prime Motor, and the Laws of Emergetics.................200005 12mo, Warren’s Elements of Machine Construction and Drawing. .8vo, Weisbach’s Kinematics and the Power of Transmission. (Herrman—Klein.) ...........0...ceeeees 8vo, Machinery of Transmission and Governors. (Herr- (man—Klein.) ..........ccceesesees «...8V0, Wood’s Elements of Analytical Mechanics................ 8vo, « Principles of Elementary Mechanics............. 12mo, © Turbines ese ss snssinscce sess ee eowisee ewan ns oases 8vo, The World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893................ 4to, METALLURGY. leston’s Metallu: of Silver, Gold, and Mercury: ee I.—Silver. . oe a Spey acasanpus aus oie: eiavereieraneiere ers see Savedargie 8vo, Vol. IL—Gold and Mercury.........cccccccceeccceeees 8vo, ** Tles’s Lead-smelting.......... 0.00000 ceccescceccees 12mo, Keep’s Cast Irons... cs. os ssccsseniewes es venee eases sccenseas 8vo, Kunhardt’s Practice of Ore Dressing in Lurope.......... 8vo, Le Chatelier’s High-temperature Measurements. (Boudouard— Burgess.) ....2..seceescececcceeeces Svinte siete +-...12mo, Metealf’s Steel. A Manual for Steel-users...........0.. 12mo, Smith’s Materials of Machines................ceeeeeee 12mo, Thurston’s Materials of Engineering. In Three Parts...... 8vo, Part II.—Iron and Steel.........ccccseccccenscecnccacs 8vo, Part IIIA Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes and Other Alloys and Their Constituents......... esse se MeOH ROS Cee 8vo, 14 $8 S88 mr Com oT ste 6p Poet SSRS8 S&S SS Anan» eoooo to wornwmw enh ass S #38Sss MINERALOGY. Barringer’s Description of Minerals of Commercial Value. Oblong, morocco, Boyd’s Resources of Southwest Virginia................ 8vo, “ Map of Southwest Virginia........ Pocket-book form, Brush’s Manual of Determinative Mineralogy. (Penfield.) .8vo, Chester’s Catalogue of Minerals...............-.00- 8vo, paper, Cloth, 3) Dictionary of the Names of Minerals............ 8vo, Dana’s System of Mineralogy.... ...... Large 8vo, half leather, “First Appendix to Dana’s New “ System of Mineralogy.” Large 8vo, “ Text-book ‘of Mineralogy............csceeeeeeeees 8vo, « Minerals and How to Study Them............... 12mo, “ Catalogue of American Localities of Minerals. Large 8vo, “ Manual of Mineralogy and Petrography.......... 12mo, Egleston’s Catalogue of Minerals and Synonyms.......... 8vo, Hussak’s The Determination of Rock-forming Minerals. (SMILD Ls: cctwie eeeis wieverivien ol cibrsrwaistery's 9 sleieneee Small 8vo, * Penfield’s Notes on Determinative Mineralogy and Record of Mineral Tests. ........ ccc cceesececncsccees 8vo, paper, Rosenbusch’s Microscopical Physiography of the Rock-making Minerals. (Idding’s.).............ceseceee eee eeaee 8vo, * Tillman’s Text-book of Important Minerals and Rocks. .8vo, Williams’s Manual of Lithology.............00eeeeeeeeees 8vo, MINING. Beard’s Ventilation of Mines..................0e20e005- 12mo, Boyd’s Resources of Southwest Virginia................. 8vo, “ Map of Southwest Virginia........ Pocket-book form, *Drinker’s Tunneling, Explosive Compounds, and Rock DPA oa siccorarsioce ses w taegrates sé eteisieaiei se 3 4to, half morocco, Fissler’s Modern High Explosives...............0eeeeee- 8vo, Fowler’s Sewage Works Analyses............000eeseeee 12mo, Goodyear’s Coal-mines of the Western Coast of the United BtAtES i ceee-dds saeeb ee SOAR CREE ET TATE SRE ST ie 12mo, Thiseng’s Manual of Mining.............cceeceeeeeeeeees 8vo, ** Tles’s Lead-smelting.............00ceeeeeeeeee eens 12mo, Kunhardt’s Practice of Ore Dressing in Europe............ 8vo, O’Driscoll’s Notes on the Treatment of Gold Ores.......... 8vo, Sawyer’s Accidents in Mines.............--eseeeeee ones 8vo, Walke’s Lectures on Explosives.........0ceccececeeesecs 8vo, Wilson’s Cyanide Processes. ........-.sseeeceesseeeeeees 12mo, Wilson’s Chlorination Process........... Bia eidid aiew: aramtionense 12mo, Wilson’s Hydraulic and Placer Mining.................. 12mo, Wilson’s Treatise on Practical and Theoretical Mine Ventila- COT. os é chsccendsee es AERA Soe A Ow oe eS 12mo, SANITARY SCIENCE. Folwell’s Sewerage. (Designing, Construction and Maintenance.) 8vo, Water-supply Engineering...............s..06- 8vo, Fuertes’s Water and Public Health............ .....0-+ 12mo, * Water-filtration Works.........sseeeseecseees 12mo, SSRSSssEe 33382 po pw eon o 2 50 n Nee PAINE NAD NHR Worn SSSSSSSS3S SSS SSS ~~ no a toh 09 S338 Gerhard’s Guide to Sanitary House-inspection.......... 16mo, Goodrich’s Economical Disposal of Towns’ Refuse...Demy 8v0, Hazen’s Filtration of Publie Water-supplies............+-- 8vo, Kiersted’s Sewage Disposal......0.+-++sesereeeseencsees 12mo, itary Standpoint. 3d Edition, Rewritten.....8vo, “Examination of Water. (Chemical and Bacterio- logical.) 2.22. .e cence eee e ence eer eereeeeeres 12mo, Merriman’s Elements of Sanitary Engineering............ 8vo, Nichols’s Water-supply. (Considered Mainly from a Chemical ,and Sanitary Standpoint.) (1883.) .........+..+--- 8vo, Ogden’s Sewer Design. .........c.sceseecceeccccsceceers 12mo, * Price’s Handbook on Sanitation -12mo, Richards’s Cost of Food. A Study in Dietaries 12mo, Richards and Woodman’s Air, Water, and Food from a Sani- tary Stamdpoint............cce esse cece cece ee ceene 8vo, Richards’s Cost of Living as Modified by Sanitary Science. 12mo, * Richards and Williams’s The Dietary Computer.......... 8vo, Rideal’s Sewage and Bacterial Purification of Sewage...... 8vo, Turneaure and Russell’s Public Water-supplies............ 8vo, Whipple’s Microscopy of Drinking-water.........-..+-.+-. 8vo, Woodhull’s Notes on Military Hygiene...............-6- 16mo, MISCELLANEOUS. Barker’s Deep-sea Soundings...........cssecceecsesceeers 8vo, Emmous’s Geological Guide-book of the Rocky Mountain Ex- eursion of the International Congress of Geologists. Large 8vo, Ferrel’s Popular Treatise on the Winds.................. 8vo0, Haines’s American Railway Management................ 12mo, Mott’s Composition, Digestibility, and Nutritive Value of Food. Mounted chart, “Fallacy of the Present Theory of Sound.......... 16mo, Ricketts’s History of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1824— VSG i nicoidis-assrsinistanienia tavrmsevewce’ no: 01g er aieiudtele d