arte i nroiet (nt nt in| ieatatattiestaty NS ose % tee i, Bebo. santa (ese Hite es tit Liebpee eat treel taper Neeruairathes IRetahadabeentahh Patagonia taht +) Nit , Seema eet it oh ahaty ett ittal Hes AIAN Hd cue SS SN ok Deval eli et ie aialteld est Lane seaee Swe Ae Sea MSS Se See feneatys Uae Oe IN ements Cornell Muiversity Ribrary BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henry W. Sage 1891 Alg707 26 YNZ. jonograph of the British Spongiadz. Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http:/Awww.archive.org/details/cu31924003411000 THE RAY SOCIETY. INSTITUTED MDCCCXLIV. This volume is issued to the Subscribers to the Ray Society for the Year 1879. LONDON: MDCOOLXXXII. A MONOGRAPH OF THE BRITISH SPONGIADA. BY THE LATE J. 8. BOWERBANK, LL.D., F.R.S., &. EDITED, WITH ADDITIONS, BY THE REV. A. M. NORMAN, M.A., F.LS., &e. VOL. IV (SUPPLEMENTARY). LONDON: PRINTED FOR THE RAY SOCIETY. MDCCCLEXXII. PRINTED BY «. E. ADLARD, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE. CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE 7 . : ‘ - . vi Memoir oF Dr. BowERBANK, BY C. TyLER, FLS. . . xii INTRODUCTION : , , i . . 5 1 CLASSIFIED List oF BritisH SPONGES . F : ; 5 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF BRITISH SPONGES . . 15 BRITISH SPONGIADA, ORDER CALCAREA 4 ‘ . 2 re 4 es SILICEA . 3 : . 27 33 ss 5 KERATOSA . ‘ ‘ . 188 CaTALOGUE OF WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES ‘ 191 APPENDIX OF BRITISH SPONGES NOT REFERRED TO BY DE, BOWERBANK , . . . 225 5 A.—CALCAREOUS SPONGES OF “Epyer Hancket . 225 ei B.—TuHE Genus Ciriona—Specigs or Hancock . 233 C.—VaRious BritisH SPONGES . ? . 288 INDEX . ‘ ‘ ‘ . * x é . 248 PREFACE. Tue following pages contain an amended list of the British Spongiads, with notes on some of the species previously described, and descriptions of many new forms. The arrangement and nomenclature of Dr. Bow- erbank has been of course strictly adhered to throughout. The descriptions of new species, and all such other passages as will be found within inverted commas, are the work of the author, and were either already actually in type, or were found among his manuscripts at the time of his decease. For the rest the editor is responsible. ‘His aim has been, first, to give a complete list of the species described in the four volumes, with com- plete references to all that is to be found respecting them, that it may form a key to the whole. Secondly, to supply recent synonyms ; but hardly any references to works published antecedently to the first volume of this work have been recorded. Thirdly, to give additional habitats. Fourthly, to add notes on certain vill PREFACE. of the species where it seemed especially desirable that this should be done. Fifthly, to supply a table of Geographical Distribution. Sixthly, to furnish a Cata- logue of all works and papers published on the Sponges, so far as known to him; and, Lastly, to add a brief Appendix which should make known to Spongologists those British Sponges which have been described, but to which no reference was made in the writings of Dr. Bowerbank. Dr. Bowerbank marked out a certain course for himself, namely, to work out conscientiously and fully the organization and intimate structure of the sponges, and upon the observations thus made to establish a system of classification. He was a pioneer who struck out anew line; others following in his footsteps profited by his work; and while they agreed with him in regarding minute microscopic structure as the basis of classification, looked for generic characters rather in the shapes assumed by the various spicula than, as Bowerbank had done, in the mode of arrangement of those spicula and manner in which they form the skeleton. This must of course be regarded merely as a very broad statement of the essential difference of views. Our author, as he had begun alone, so went on alone in his own way, not so much disregarding as seldom or rarely noticing the views of others. It is for this reason that hardly any synonymy will be found in the previous volumes of this work. To such a great extent did the author disregard references that any reader taking up his volumes would imagine that many of Dr. Bowerbank’s own species dated from PREFACE. 1x the issue of the volume in which he found them, whereas they had really been published elsewhere many years previously. The references now given will supply this omission, and what has been said will enable naturalists to understand the principles on which the author laboured. The editor has not given any synonymy or re- ferences regarding the Calcareous Sponges in the body of the work; to have done this would have necessitated a complete revision of the species, and he refers the student to the Appendix, where will be found a sum- mary of the views of Haeckel. With respect to the habitats to which the editor’s own initial (N.) is attached, indicating thereby that the Specimens referred to have either been collected by himself or are in his cabinet, he has thought it advisable only to record the localities of such speci- mens as have actually passed through Dr. Bowerbank’s hands and been identified by him. It must be under- stood, however, that this remark only applies to those habitats which have the initial N. after them; not necessarily to such as are recorded on the authority of other naturalists, unless either the record is in inverted commas without any name after it, thus showing that the note is Dr. Bowerbank’s, or it is expressly stated that he had determined the specimens. A large number of the localities to which the editor’s initial is attached will be found to be situated in the counties of Galway and Mayo, where a remark- ably fine collection of sponges was obtained during a scientific expedition which Mr. D. Robertson, of Glas- x PREFAOE. gow, and himself made to that part of Ireland in the summer of 1874. In concluding this brief preface, the Hditor feels it necessary to state that, while he most gladly gave Dr. Bowerbank all the aid in his power during the pro- gress of his work, and placed his collection unre- servedly in his hands for description, he found himself frequently obliged to dissent from the conclusions arrived at by the author. In editing this posthumous volume of his valued friend his aim has been simply to leave it as Dr. Bowerbank’s work. To have attempted to indicate his own views would have been to remodel the whole, and the species would have had to be thrown into more numerous genera, defined on different principles, while, on the other hand, the number of so-called species would have been con- siderably reduced. Great care will, however, require to be used by the naturalist who shall hereafter attempt to rearrange and redefine the species of British Sponges. In every case the type specimen should be examined, for to his certain knowledge subsequently found speci- mens, during the latter years of Dr. Bowerbank’s life when his powers of observation were not so keen as they had been, were frequently erroneously referred to already named types with which they had no con- nection. Let the reviser therefore be cautious and bear in mind that hastily formed conclusions and lumping of species which are really distinct is a greater fault than for a time, if need be, keeping two forms apart which are in reality referable to the same type. It may be useful to Spongologists to know that Dr. PREFAOE. xi Bowerbank’s collection is now preserved in the British Museum, having been purchased by the nation; and that the late Mr. Albany Hancock’s Clionw, described in the Appendix, together with his mountings of the Spicula, are in the Museum of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, while a second series of his typical mounted spicula is in the collection of the Editor. The members of the Ray Society will greatly appre- ciate the brief notice of the life of Dr. Bowerbank which follows this, and which has been kindly prepared by one who was in close association with him for many years. Few naturalists of the present generation will be aware until they have read that interesting memoir how much the progress of natural history in Great Britain in years gone by was fostered and furthered by the energy, zeal, and enthusiasm of our late kind friend, the author of these volumes. MEMOIR OF DR. BOWERBANK. James Scorr BowrrsBank, LL.D., F.R.S., was born in Sun Street, Bishopsgate, London, on the 14th July, 1797, and received his early education from the then celebrated Dr. Kelly, of Finsbury Square, London. About the age of fifteen he entered his father’s distillery, where in subsequent years, and in conjunc- tion with his late brother Edward, the business was carried on under the name of Bowerbank and Sons. His strong leaning to scientific investigation began to exhibit itself when he was a mere boy, and at an early age he took up the study of Astronomy, Chemistry, Botany, Geology, Anatomy and Physio- logy. The pursuit of science, indeed, occupied every moment of his time not necessarily devoted to business, and though he never neglected the latter, he ever made business relations available whenever possible for the furtherance of his researches. About the year 1820 he joined The Old Mathematical Society, which held its meetings in Crispin Street, Spitalfields, and here he attended the well-arranged lectures of Mr. Wilson, a gentleman of considerable acquirements. In this Society Bowerbank was after- wards also appreciated himself as a lecturer on various xiv MEMOIR OF DR. BOWERBANK. subjects; his diagrams and botanical models designed at this period have been used for some years at one of the Metropolitan Hospitals in the class lectures. He threw himself, with great energy, into the work of the London Clay Club and investigated the fossil fruits and seeds from the Isle of Sheppey. In 1840 he began their history, but this publication was not continued; one hundred and eighty thousand fossil fruits and seeds are now in the British Museum as a result of his industry in collecting. Through the efforts of the earnest workers of the London Clay Club arose, in 1847, the Palewontographical Society, which has done so much to make known the richness of the fossils of our own country, and which has produced up to June, 1882, thirty-six quarto volumes. At the first establishment of the Palwontographical Society Dr. Bowerbank was its Honorary Secretary. He held that office a considerable time, and for the last ten years of his life was its President. Entomology was another of his favourite studies in early days. He wrote a valuable paper in the ‘ Entomo- logical Magazine,’ vol. i, p. 239, 1833, on the “ Circula- tion of the Blood in Insects ;” a second, ‘Ent. Mag.,’ vol. iv, p. 179, 1837, on the “ Distribution of the Trachesx in the Wing of Chrysopa Perla ;’.and a third, ‘ Ent. Mag.,’ vol. v, p. 300, 1838, on the “ Structure of the Scales on the Wings of Lepidopterous Insects.” Dr. Bowerbank was one of the originators of the Royal Microscopical Society, and filled the office of President. He also frequently contributed to its Transactions. In the ‘ Monthly Microscopical Journal,’ vol. iii, p. 281, 1870, will be found his account of the early im- provements made in the microscope in 1828 by Tully, MEMOIR OF DR. BOWERBANK. Xv and afterwards by Ross, Powell and Leland, and Smith and Beck. The microscope was his especial delight and study, and by its use his investigations into the structure and habit of Sponges, both recent and fossil, were greatly facilitated and brought toa state of comparative completeness. His microscope being of very excellent construction sO many eminent men came to him in order to examine their specimens by his Instrument, that he was compelled to fix one night in the week for their reception ; and thus originated the celebrated Monday Evening Meetings. On those occasions both old friends and students always received a kindly greeting and welcome both at his house in the New North Road, ‘and at his after residence, Park Street, Islington, and finally in his capacious Museum at Highbury Grove. In 1832 he was elected a Fellow of the Geological Society, and soon afterwards wrote a paper for that Society entitled ‘‘ An Account of a Deposit containing Land Shells at Gore Cliff, Isle of Wight” (‘ Geol. Soe. Proc.,’ ii, p. 449, 1837); this memoir was followed by others on the “‘ London and Plastic Clay Formations ”’ (‘ Trans. Geol. Soc.,’ vol. vi, p. 168, 1842); on the ‘*Siliceous Bodies of the Chalk, Greensands and Oolites””’ (Trans. Geol. Soc.,’ vol. vi, p. 181, 1842), and on “A New Species of Pterodactyl found in the Upper Chalk of Kent” (‘Geol. Soc. Journ.,’ ii, p- 7, 1845). He gradually amassed a large collection of fossils very many of which now enrich the national and other collections. Dr. Bowerbank was one of the founders of the Xvi MEMOIR OF DR. BOWERBANK. Zoological Society, and for many years a member of its Council. It was in his Museum at Highbury Grove that the first idea of an Aquarium was started. A small glass jar was used to keep Chara translucens for microscopical purposes, to which was afterwards added some fish and animalcules, until at length the idea was worked out by Mr. N. Ward, Mr. Warrington, Mr. M. Marshall, and others, and brought to its present state of development. As a Fellow of the Royal Society he, in 1857, contributed papers on the Anatomy and Physiology of the Spongiade, but it is as a member of the Ray Society, which with the late Dr. Johnstone he assisted in founding, and of which he was for many years Treasurer, he will be best known and remembered for his ‘ Monograph of the British Spongiade.’ In the year 1841 a circumstance occurred which gave a bias to his future studies in favour of the Sponges. A storm at Brighton had thrown upon the beach vast quantities of seaweed and Sponges as far as the eye could reach. Although dead they were still filled with the soft matter of the Sponge. He selected the most promising specimens, placing them in glass jars filled up with strong spirit, and had them immediately con- veyed to London for systematic examination, and from these he derived more information than from many times their number of dry specimens. From this time he devoted himself, with great zeal, to the study of the Spongiade, and having agents on many parts of the coast collecting fossils, he employed them in procuring Sponges. Friends also in different parts of the world made consignments which were of the utmost value to him in his investigations, His MEMOIR OF DR. BOWERBANK. xvii general instructions were ‘“‘ Only remove as much of the watery matter as will prevent the Sponges from rotting on the voyage; but do not send me clean Specimens as if intended for the bath.” The accumulations of years of collecting, numbering many hundreds of specimens, are now preserved in the British Museum. Forty-five memoirs from his pen, of which the majority refer to Sponges, are recorded in the “Catalogue of Scientific Papers,” compiled by the Royal Society. Dr. Bowerbank, whilst working to complete his fourth volume on the Sponges, was seized with a sudden illness, which within a month terminated fatally. He died at St. Leonards on the 8th March, 1877, in the eightieth year of his age, and lies buried in the Churchyard of Hollington, not far from Hastings, in Sussex. INTRODUCTION. «Tue third volume of this work was scarcely finished when the Rev. A.M. Norman, who had already rendered me such important service by placing his very fine collection of Sponges in my hands for examination and description, sent me a large quantity of additional specimens which he had recently acquired during his dredging excursions, and in other ways. It is on this collection that the present supplemental volume is chiefly based, but I am also indebted for other new species to my old friend Mr. Peach, and to Mr. Hillier of Ramsgate. “ The greater part of the Sponges sent to me hy Mr. Norman were from the North-West of Ireland, and these were found to be especially rich in representatives of the genus Isodictya. The very numerous species of this genus already published rendered the labour and care necessary for the examination and comparison of the newly acquired species so great, that I soon felt the necessity of devising a series of divisions and sub- divisions of the known forms to facilitate the exami- nation of those which I had now todetermine. These divisions and subdivisions proved so very useful, and the discrimination of the species was found to be so VOL. IV. a® 1 2 BRITISH SPONGIADA. greatly facilitated by their use, that I have been naturally led to the conclusion that they would, if published, be of similar assistance to my brother naturalists who may take up the study of these in- teresting animals; and as other genera, such as Hyme- niacidon and Halichondria, also contain a very con- siderable number of species, I have applied to them the same system of division and subdivision. “In the preface to Vol. II (p. viii), I had already dilated on the necessity of the subdivision of the species of each genus in accordance with the forms and other peculiarities of the skeleton spicula so as to facilitate. the recognition of the species; and as our knowledge of the British Sponges has advanced and the number of known species greatly increased since 1866, it has now become necessary, as I have just stated, to still further subdivide the species in those genera in which they have become inconveniently numerous. I have, therefore, in the tabulated list of Sponges which follows these introductory remarks adopted a mode of sub- sections in many genera by the use of the characters afforded by the dermal membrane in conjunction with those of the skeleton. “The accurate discrimination of ihe numerous and protean animals which constitute the class of the Spongiade is still a growing science, and as we advance in our experience of the variable characters, from diversities of habitat and other causes, not only of the different genera and species, but also of the in- dividuals of the same species, we find that their correct determination necessitates a more and more minute investigation into the peculiarities of their anatomical structures. The genus in some few cases may be INTRODUCTION. 3 ascertained with tolerable certainty by a cursory examination of the specimen, but the determination of the species can rarely or never be depended upon without a searching anatomical investigation of the structures, nor can this be achieved by the use of low powers of the microscope, because in very many cases the most characteristic elements of discrimination are exceedingly minute, and often also very few in number ; and no definite conclusions can be reached until we have made ourselves intimately acquainted with the whole of the component parts of the subject under examination. Tedious as this mode of thorough investigation may at first sight appear, the admirable adaptation of each part to its own special purpose, and the beautiful forms and arrangement of the spicules and other component elements in the several parts of the Sponge, amply repay the time and care necessary for their investigation and realisation. *« The striking diversity of form which we observe in a great number of the British Sponges is due both to difference in habitat and varieties of basal attach- ment. The young Sponge, which may have been developed on a slender seaweed or zoophyte, becomes coating and parasitical, but when growing on a shell or stone it assumes either a massive or a coating form. The occurrence of these differences in habitat and localisation render it necessary that they should be observed and recorded. In other branches of marine zoology we have been so accustomed to place depen- dence on form and colour as important characters, which in Sponges are comparatively of very little value, that these cautions become necessary, and more espe- cially so as the figures in Vol. ITI are in many instances 4, BRITISH SPONGIADA. taken from small, very rare, of unique specimens, while others subsequently obtained have been found to be of much larger dimensions and to vary to a great extent from the types of the species figured. The structural and anatomical details are in truth the only safe guides to the correct discrimination of species. In a branch of natural history so comparatively new, and which has been so imperfectly studied by our predecessors, it naturally occurs that many of the species have been determined from very imperfect examples, and it therefore is highly desirable to obtain as much additional information as possible with respect to their variations in form, colour, and other characters, and to register as many additional habitats as are obtainable. “It is, moreover, strikingly apparent from the many new species continually being found among the Sponges dredged and otherwise collected by British naturalists, that those already described do not by any means comprise the whole of our British Fauna, and it is highly probable that future labourers in this interesting field of natural history will add very con- siderably to their number.” “CLASSIFIED LIST OF BRITISH SPONGES. “OrpDER 1.—CALCAREA. Genus I—GRANTIA. 1, Grantia compressa. 3. Grantia ensata, 2. 5 ciliata. 4, 7 tessellata. Genus II —LevcosouEnta. 1. Leucosolenia botryoides. 3. Leucosolenia lacunosa. 2. a contorta, 4. a5 coriacea. Genus ITI.—LEuvconta. 1. Leuconia nivea. 3. Leuconia pumila. 2. - fistulosa. 4, es Somesii. Genus 1V.—LeEvucoaypsia. Leucogypsia Gossei. Orper 2.—SILICEA. Genus V.—GEODIA. Geodia Zetlandica. Genus VI. PACHYMATISMA. Pachymatisma Johnstonia. Genus VII.—NoRMANIA Normania crassa. erPpr iy BRITISH SPONGIADA. Genus VIII.—Ecionemia. . Hcionemia compressa. 8. Ecionemia coactura. 5 ponderosa. Genus TX.—POLYMASTIA. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acuate. . Polymastia ornata. 4, Polymastia brevis. 93 bulbosa. 5. 3 spinula. x robusta. 6. 3 radiosa. Section **.—Skeleton spicula spinulate. . Polymastia mammillaris. | 8. Polymastia conigera. Genus X.—HALYPHYSEMA. . Halyphysema Tumanowiczii. | 2. Halyphysema ramulosa. Genus XI.—CIOcALYPTA. . Ciocalypta penicillus. {| 2. Ciocalypta Leei. Genus XII.—TETHYA. Section *—Skeleton spicula acerate. . Tethya cranium. 3. Tethya Schmidtii. » Collingsii. Section **,—Skeleton spicula acuate. . Tethya lyncurium. | 5. Tethya spinosa. Section ***,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. . Tethya spinularia. Genus XIII —Hanicnemia. Halicnemia patera. Genus XIV.—DictryocyLinDRvs. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate and acuate. . Dictyocylindrus ventilabrum. 3. Dictyocylindrus radiosus. 4 ramosus. CLASSIFIED LIST, 7 Section **—Skeleton spicula acuate. 4. Dictyocylindrus Howsei. 7. Dictyocylindrus fascicularis. 2 4 hispidus. 8. Pe virgultosus, 6. ss aculeatus. Section ***,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. 9. Dictyocylindrus pumilus. Section ****,—Skeleton spicula cylindrical. 10. Dictyocylindrus stuposus. | 11. Dictyocylindrus rugosus. Section ***#*.—Skeleton spicula acuate, and acerate or cylindrical. 12. Dictyocylindrus rectangulus. Genus XV.—PHAKELLIA. 1. Phakellia robusta. | 2. Phakellia ventilabrum. Genus XVI.—MicRociona. Section **—Skeleton spicula acerate. 1. Microciona fictitia. 3. Microciona fraudator. 2. vs Kentii. 4, x tumulosa. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acuate. Sub-section A.—Skeleton spicula smooth. 5. Microciona levis. | 6. Microciona simplicissima. Sub-section B.—Skeleton spicula spinous. 7. Microciona fallax. 10. Microciona ambigua. 8. 4 spinulenta. 11. " jecusculum. 9. a5 armata. 12. is plumosa. Section ***,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. 13. Microciona atrasanguinea. Genus XVIJ.—HYMERAPHIA. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acuate. 1. Hymeraphia vermiculata. | 2. Hymeraphia clavata. om 9 12. ot go fo 10. 11. 12. . Hymedesmia stellata. BRITISH SPONGIADA. Section **,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. . Hymeraphia verticillata. 5. Hymeraphia simplex. 53 stellifera. 6. 3 coronula. Genus XVIIIL—HyMeEpEsM1a. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. . Hymedesmia inflata. | 2. Hymedesmia occulta. Section **.—Skeleton spicula acuate. . Hymedesmia radiata. 6. Hymedesmia pilata. ss indistincta. 7. 3 pulchella. vi pansa. 8. as Peachii. Section ***.—Skeleton spicula spinulate. 11. Hymedesmia tenuicula. a simplicissima. Section ****,—Skeleton spicula cylindrical. Hymedesmia Zetlandica. Genus X1X.—HYMENIACIDON. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. Sub-section A.—Dermis aspiculous. . Hymeniacidon albescens. Sub-section B.—Dermal spicula dispersed. . Hymeniacidon Thomasii. 6. Hymeniacidon membrana. 55 coccineus, 7. 5 firmus (felted). "95 lacteus. 8. placentula. 3 perarmatus. 9. * armiger. Sub-section OC.—Dermal spicula reticulated. Hymeniacidon Brettii (fasci- 13. Hymeniacidon fallaciusus. culated). 14. y; tegeticula. ss fragilis. 15. 3 solidus. re reticulatus. CLASSIFIED LIST. 9 Section **,—Skeleton spicula acuate. Sub-section A.—Spicula smooth, dermal membrane aspiculous. 16. Hymeniacidon perlevis. 17, ” 18. Hymeniacidon crustula. pachyderma. 19, 3 Hillieri. Sub-section B.—Spicula of dermis dispersed. 20. Hymeniacidon caruncula. 26. Hymeniacidon virgultosus. 21. Pe, sanguineus. 27 3 radiosus 22. 55 mammeatus. | (felted). 23. <6 consimilis. 28. 33 medius. 24, en macilentus. | 29 es Aldousii. 25. 53 fallax. ' 30. 55 virgulatus. Sub-section C.—Dermal spicula reticulated or fasciculated. 31. Hymeniacidon varians. 34. Hymeniacidon armaturus. 32. 45 viridans. 35. 3 callosus. 33. 3 aureus. 36. 2 plumiger. Section ***,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. Sub-section A.—Dermal membrane aspiculous. 37. Hymeniacidon subereus. 38. ‘i carnosus. 39. Hymeniacidon gelatinosus. 40, % foliatus. Sub-section B.—Spicula of dermal membrane dispersed. 41. Hymeniacidon ficus. 42. % sulphureus. 44, Hymeniacidon claviger. 45. Z tenebrosus. 43. pg celatus. Sub-section C.—Spicula of dermal membrane reticulated or fasciculated. 46. Hymeniacidon subclavatus. | 47. Hymeniacidon paupertas. Section ****,— Skeleton spicula cylindrical. 48, Hymeniacidon Dujardinii. Genus XX.—BATTERSBYIA. Battersbyia Bucklandi. 10 BRITISH SPONGIADE. Genus XXI.—HaLicHONDRIA. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. Sub-section A.—Dermal membrane aspiculous. ]. Halichondria MacIntoshii. 2. Halichondria regularis. Sub-section B.—Spicula of dermal membrane dispersed. 3. Halichondria caduca. 4. 55 inconspicua. 5. i incerta. 6. Halichondria coalita. 7. is mutula. 8. . cylindracea. Sub-section C.—Spicula of dermal membrane reticulated. 9. Halichondria panicea. 15. Halichondria Couchii (uni- 10. 4) glabra. spiculous). 11. 35 angulata. 16. Robertsoni. 12. ee distorta. (fasciculated). 13. ‘hi edusa. 17. 53 condensa(mul- 14. 9 ambigua (mul- tispiculous). tispiculous). 18. 5% cora!loides. Section **—Skeleton spicula acuate. Sub-section A.—Skeleton spicula smooth. Dermal spicula dispersed. 19. Halichondria Thompsoni. 20. forceps. 21. +5 simplex. 22. Halichondria subdola. 23. 5 foliata. Sub-section B.—Skeleton spicula smooth. Dermis reticulated. 24. Halichondria corrugata. 25. ra faleula. 26, Halichondria flabellifera. Section *** —Skeleton spicula spinous-acuate. Dermal spicula more or less fasciculated. Sub-section A.—Spicula of dermal membrane fasciculated. 27. Halichondria incrustans. 34. Halichondria scandens. 28. i candida. 35. is Batei. 29. - irregularis. 36. * nigricans. 30. a3 Dickiei. » 37, ‘a albula. 31. 8 Pattersoni. | 38. Pe expansa,. 32. Fi pulchella. , 89. =e virgea. 33. i Ingalli. | CLASSIFIED LIS'. 11 Sub-section B.—Spicula spinous acuate. Dermal spicula dispersed. 40. Halichondria granulata. Section ****,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. 4]. Halichondria farinaria. | 42. Halichondria inornata. Genus XXII.—Isopicrya. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. Sub-section A.—Dermal membrane aspiculous. Primary skeleton fibres unispiculous. 1. Isodictya cinerea. 4, Isodictya ramusculus, 2: 35 permollis, 5. » ferula. 3. ms mammeata. Sub-section B.—Dermis aspiculous. Skeleton bi- or trispiculous. 6. Isodictya rosea. 8. Isodictya obscura. ts 45 pygmea. Sub-section O.—Dermal membrane aspiculous. Skeleton: primary fibres multispiculous. 9. Isodictya indefinita. 13. Isodictya luteosa. 10. 53 indistincta. P14. = anomala (dermal 11. > simplex. membrane unknown). 12, és pocillum. P15. #5 parasitica (do.). Sub-section D.— Dermal membrane spiculo-reticulated. Skeleton: primary fibres unispiculous. 16. Isodictya Peachii. 18. Isodictya elegans. 17. i varians. 19. io fallax. Sub-section E.—Dermal membrane spiculo-reticulated. Skeleton primary lines bi- or trispiculous. 20. Isodictya MacAndrewii. 23, Isodictya perplexa. 21, fistulosa. 24, Pe densa. 92. . dichotoma. 25. % Gregorii. j2 BRITISH SPONGIADA. Sub-section F.—Dermal membrane spiculo-reticulated. Skeleton: primary lines multispiculous. 26, Isodictya pallida. 29. Isodictya incerta. 27. ss simulans. 30. ss crassa. 28. af Ingalli. Sub-section G.—Spicula of dermis dispersed. Skeleton: primary fibres bi- or trispiculous. 31. Isodictya Bowerbanki (= 33. Isodictya paupercula. I. simulo). 34. i clava. 32. ¥ filamenta. Sub-section H.—Spicula of dermis dispersed. Skeleton: primary lines multispiculous. 35. Isodictya jugosa. 37. Isodictya trunca. 36. sf palmata. Section **.—Spicula of the skeleton acuate. Sub-section A—Dermal membrane aspiculous. Skeleton: primary fibres multispiculous, smooth. 38. Isodictya infundibuliformis. 40. Isodictya gracilis. 39. i dissimilis. 41. fF invalida. Sub-section B.—Dermal membrane spicula dispersed. Primary skeleton fibres with few smooth spicula. 42. Isodictya Normani. 43. es coriacea (some of the acuates incipiently spinous). 44., 7 hispida. Sub-section C.—Dermal membrane spiculous, spicula dispersed. Primary skeleton fibres multispiculous. 45. Isodictya fucorum. 58. Isodictya laciniosa. 46. a Alderi. 54, sy dubia. 47. ‘ Edwardii. 55. 3 imitata. 48, A lobata. 56. 3 nodosa. 49, ” paupera. 57. a involuta. 50. Pr uniformis. 58. i pertenuis. 51. a Clarkei. 59, ey scitula. 52. % Barleei. OLASSIFIED LIST. 13 Sub-section D.—Dermal membrane spiculous, spicula reticulated. Primary skeleton fibres multispiculous. 60. Isodictya collina. Section ***,—Spicula of skeleton acuate, more or less spinous. Sub-section A.—Primary lines of the skeleton bi- or trispiculous. 61. Isodictya Beanii. 64. Isodictya funalis. 62. »- Normani. 65. - Hyndmani. 63. es coriacea, Sub-section B.—Primary lines of the skeleton multispiculous. 66. Isodictya lurida. 70. Isodictya implicita. 67. Fe fimbriata. 71. 5 ineequalis. 68. 5 tumulosa. 72. “ deformis. 69. 9 rugosa. Genus XXIII.—RaPHIODESMA. Section **,—Skeleton spicula acuate. 1. Raphiodesma floreum. 4, Raphiodesma sordidum. 2. 3 lingua. 5. i fallaciosum. 3. si simplicissimum. 6. 53 intermedium. Genus XXIV.—SPONGILLA. Section *:—Skeleton spicula acerate. Spicula of ovaria birotulate. 1. Spongilla fluviatilis. | 2. Spongilla Parfitti. Section **,.—Skeleton spicula acerate. Ovaria spiculous: spicula not birotulate. 8. Spongilla lacustris. | 4. Spongilla sceptrifera ? Genus XXV.—DESMACIDON. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. J. Desmacidon fruticosus. | 2. Desmacidon Jeffreysii. Section **.—Skeleton spicula acuate. 3. Desmacidon Peachii. 5. Desmacidon incognitus. 4, 3 constrictus. 6. 3 pannosus. 14 11. 12. fo Pe BRITISH SPONGIADA. Sub-section A.—Spicula acuate subclavate. . Desmacidon copiosus. 9. Desmacidon rotalis. is cavernula. 10. 5 similaris. Section ***,—Skeleton spicula spinulate. Desmacidon egagropilus. Section ****,—Skeleton spicula cylindrical. Desmacidon columella. Genus XXVI.—RaPuHyRrvs. Raphyrus Griffithsii. Genus XXVII.—DIPLopEMIA. Diplodemia vesicula. ORDER 3,—KERATOSA. Genus XXVIII.—SpPonGcionELua. Spongionella pulchella. Genus XXIX.—CuHatina. Section *.—Skeleton spicula acerate. . Chahna oculata. 5. Chalina gracilenta. és cervicornis. 6. 5 limbata. 35 Montaguii. 7. a Grantii. 7” Flemingii. Section **.—Skeleton spicula acuate. . Chalina inornata. Genus XXX.—OpuHLITASPONGIA. . Ophlitaspongia papilla. | 2. Ophlitaspongia seriata. Genus XXXI—VeErRonaia. Verongia Zetlandica. Genus XXXII.—DysipgEa. . Dysidea fragilis, | 2. Dysidea coriacea.” GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION. Tue following table has been prepared in order to show the known geographical and bathymetrical dis- tribution of the British Sponges. With very few exceptions, the localities inserted in the columns are such only as have been recorded in the ‘ Monograph of the British Spongiade.’ The columns “ Abyssal” and “ 100—500 fathoms” have been partially filled in from Mr. Carter’s Report of the Sponges dredged in the *‘ Porcupine” Expeditions of 1869 and 1870 (‘ Ann. Nat. Hist.,’ ser. 4, vol. xviii, 1876). The table makes it clear that the Sponge Fauna of many parts of our seas remains almost wholly unexplored; and it is hoped that the very deficiency exhibited here will have a tendency among many other causes to induce our younger and rising naturalists to take up the great field of research which here lies open to them. Speak- ing from a very extended knowledge of the zoology of our coasts, I unhesitatingly state that no other class of animals offers to the student so rich a field for exploration, or one in which he is likely to meet with so many hitherto unknown species. A. M.N. 16 BRITISH SPONGIADA. | |g § 3 iB als eT LT | ABEL lal || [ete ro Se i : ‘eg! | Pele) | (fee SEs ssl lelersle! | ise 314818 |2 ass) SlSlsll_leele SlSSlAlsiS1815|/ FSi chardidisieie 33/3 \8 elses is sae gisiselr Fidaabeltelaisltie acide B42 SIE IO Elka lal 0 la isle GRANTIA. 1. compressa (O. Fab.)...)-+]...|-+|-+]4]...|L.--|+]4]4]+] +]. ]+ 2. ciliata (O. Fab.) ...... AH IEIAP |e]. f |e] JE]. WEL 3. ensata, Bow. ............ sacl ail satel faio at [eens tena levied etllnact| ad afol aus anel ae 4, tessallata, Bow. ......{cc [ic feccfeeefeca[eesfeee[ecsfeeefeee foes Sl el LEUCOSOLENIA. » 1. botryoides (HUI. & Sol.)|--)...}...]..J..f..J].| ERIE I4] AL] 2. contorta, Bow. ......... Scalbeal cvialltet lee hic él a4] asalicaclase eed = UP. feel 8. lacunosa (Johns.) ...... Sw ee bare etd Po veleeefEfe HE] 4. coriacea (Flem.) ...... +I+]...|-F].-[--|-4]... +y+}...]}4 LEUconia. 1, nivea (Flem.)........00 selva asl [ewe we JEIEIEJEI EP. E+ 2. fistulosa (Johns.) ...... os ol PO 3. pumila, Bow............. iia aeal asiel[biee eta [aa tal ast teases eee of Healey aed 4, Somesii, Bow. ......... See sats A eP Newel ealiveny [OR LEUCOGYPSIA. 1. Gossei, Bow. ............ al san'l onal has oN so OO Oe ol Pe GEODIA, 1. Zetlandica, Johns...... Ea lh all eave somal rae atte label | See erga cata eas [aioe { PACHYMATISMA. 1. Johnstonia, Bow....... +/+... ne ot le ol Pd ot ot INORMANIA. 1. crassa, Bow. ............ +)...]...)-+]... aie eli +A ECIONEMIA. | 1. compressa, Bow. ...... SH fas Bhccctlaes fecks cal vc eal soualated tel easel ware [noe |facafoeotece ate 2. ponderosa, Bow. ...... ata] Sve fiscallacaa tal emal ona veal neal cate | Phase | ae boxe |e 3. coactura, Bow. ........./.cfeefeee exaleeslse leas w+ (POLYMASTIA, 1. ornata, Bow. ............ eialiows] Bel esa as [epalliawe 2. bulbosa, Bow. ... 3. robusta, Bow. ......... 4, brevis, Bow. ............ +t GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION, N. Scotland and Orkney. B. Scotland. W. Scotland and Hebrides. Clyde District. N. Ireland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Shetland. W. Ireland. S. Ireland. Devon and Cornwall. S. England. Channel Islands. #. England. Abyssal. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. 1—50 fathoms. Littoral. PoLtyMastra (continued). 5. spinula, Bow............ 6. radiosa, Bow............ 7. mammillaris (Johns.) 8. conigera, Bow. ......... +444 ++ HALIPHYSEMA. 1. Tumanowiczii, Bow...}.,....)..)..J.d [pele i+ CIOCALYPTA. 1. penicillus, Bow aca el ta enna xact Leal exe set olla 2. Leei, Bow.........c.c000 naallicas Sa rollcwal| acs lad wcail aa ards TETHYA. 1, cranium (Lamk) ...... SF lacsiloa| dose as 2, Collingsii, Bow......... sda ainel eas [Meaalead lives | 2) aa 3. Schmidtii, Bow. 0...) ppeefecfefecdees 4, lyneurium, (Linn.) ...)-+]...)...)..)f) hehe. 5. spinosa, Bow............ sae liacel ge [einokaelsieshians ater ++ ++: pain ieee es mans jHALICNEMIA. DicTyocyLINDRUs. . ventilabrum, Bow. ...J...).. Jefe fecafecefeee{erefeee .ramosus (Montagw)...}...|...).c foc feccdeefeefeesfeed . radiosus, Bow. ......... acd ar heats nel ise Sane | ee fae lees ++ ++: aculeatus, Bow......... aise anal eae nec eo ose [doalasealwyelleaulleses . fascicularis, Bow....... Leal wal hee na | uaselhiae [sacl est cans cal CONT SU GO DO RY eS ft BOS . stuposus (Montagu)...\+)+]...)+]...[... . rugosus, Bow. ......... +)+ VOL. IV. Fier + ++ — ++ mot ++: 6. spinularia, Bow. ...... SPI ales tafe) saa haga saudea ies seal sodlsslicel lactone 1. patera, Bow.........00 A Thieal soed coil in| S's haga tanetse [age va [eee aa . Howsei, Bow............ sein acl fel na idl os (AE seca] Eos cll ee “4 . . hispidus (Montagu)...)+]...)...)...]-.cfeefee{eee fe fblbpepehedie ++ . virgultosus, Bow....... Ib» lkcatal ees hoeel| eave lens vac eae ena ee cele . . pumilus, Bow. ......... sedle salle] oa feenl tas AE eee SESE eel este] eaelleas hee ++ 12. rectangulus, Bow...... pre eee Be alee behaleleatouadll 18 BRITISH SPONGIADA. N. Scotland and Orkney. E. Scotland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Clyde District. N. Ireland. W. Ireland. S. Ireland. Devon and Cornwall. S. England. Channel Islands. E. England. Abyssal. Littoral. Shetland. W. Scotland and Hebrides. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. 1—50 fathoms. PHAKELLIA. 1. robusta, Bow,......0.. 2. ventilabrum (Johns.) . ++ MIcROcIONA. 1. fictitia, Bow. ........00. fee pera cee nee ees ee 2. Kentii, Bow............. aralanee coca eed ga iss 3. fraudator, Bow... 4. tumulosa, Bow.... 5. levis, Bow......cc00 6. simplicissima, Bow....)+}...)..)../cholelesclecclees 7. fallax, Bow. ...... stesinn sal cae] ean caist sca gal nae eat bagel 28 8. spinulenta, Bow. ...... SF [oeel ail sace| haa) sae] eel s% [ic cllone| ee [Saw atte] oss Hae 9. armata, Bow............. Ee laa aid acs vias feaea| nea eel Fe face natal > [ocartccs [ate 10. ambigua, Bow.......... Hele csrel oa ns fase acl |sica Lee los 11. jecusculum, Bow...) 0). [tf deeleecleeddees 12. plumosa (Montagu) aise | sine [aS ac swe | nvia| gall el ara [es 13. atrasanguinea, Bow...J+}...).0)0h.fedeedeecle ++ eee } ees ++ ++i ++i: +44: HYMERAPHIA, 1. vermiculata, Bow...... +)... 2. clavata, Bow........... lice trl sca|sarfeoel endl sastoarbealeanhenabeny 3. verticellata, Bow....... he coal albwalasn' let F 4, stellifera, Bow. ......... Sd Ga PO ed | 5. simplex, Bow,..,........ lewalliea feacl os 6. coronula, Bow. ......... Sy wel Cee ee eed ee ee ++ es HYMEDESMIA. 1. inflata, Bow. ............ iss leeetecalasidl ads 2. occulta, Bow..........008 of | aes (areallscanlencel eal 3, radiata, Bow............ Sl OO Cl oO 4. indistincta, Bow. ......)+]...)...1...).. 5, pansa, Bow. .........0.. ivaila.az |siba'lh sselloaal ave 6, pilata, Bow. wi fefedecteelefees 7. pulchella, Bow.......... st founs [a sa sella 8. Peachii, Bow,........... evel ics pm fe ca heal seal ea leartagoo | Sas (erp tne as Pawel 9. stellata, Bow.......... val Efeca fons fern caalonalaaelanalaae{venl be bevalonal lia 10. simplicissima, Bow....J+) fle lledleledececlclcdt. 11. tenuicula, Bow......... is sna favwa lye fuse asl epee beatae tee fons 12. Zetlandica, Bow. ....../+).. eres epee + ++ ++ +0 ++: ++ ++ GEOGRAPHIOAL DISTRIBUTION. 1 9 Shetland. N. Scotland and Orkney. BE. Scotland. W. Scotland and Hebrides. Clyde District. N. Ireland. W. Ireland. S. Ireland. St. George’s Channel, Kc. Devon and Cornwall. 8. England. Channel Islands. E. England. Abyssal. 1—50 fathoms. 50—100 fathoms. Littoral. 100—500 fathoms. HYMENIACIDON. 39, ion 1S 6 00 NI OD OUR 0 DOS . albescens (Johns.)...... ela Thomasii, Bow.......... otal . coccineus, Bow... walled . lacteus, Bow......c00.. haectiiee perarmatus, Bow....... membrana, Bow. ...... firmus, Bow. ......60006: seidlsice 4 . placentula, Bow. ...... siete la sala . armiger, Bow, ......... sia ial at cle . Brettii, Bow.... . fragilis, Bow.... . reticulatus, Bow. . . fallaciosus, Bow. . . tegeticula, Bow......... sien avloaclis . Solidus, Bow.....c.cccee ote (axel sae veal laten [sak . perleovis (Montagu) ...)...)ecfeclede fens . pachyderma, Bow,,..... cates] ses easl vans [estlegal uvelene . crustula, Bow. .....0 seas tea oes lieaia ode Lael meal Seat aca ora . Hillieri, Bow......c000 soa fateh nae . caruncula, Bow. ...... stale ote . sanguineus (Gramt)...|...]...J.. . mammeatus, Bow...... eel wilieg . consimilis, Bow. ,..... ss alleaial aes tencall ahtalioas allan tae , macilentus, Bow....... Leal cate iaaleiadla 8 feselagel enslass nee eRe fallax, Bow. vocccccceres scat ate | sine lebve fs olka] 84.3) ta ee . Virgultosus (Jonns.)...|....cefeveerfeefeefecersfers . radiosus, Bow. ......... cod hacea barualla a le eee . medius, Bow... Peal ale alec [aval ae vile . Aldousii, Bow. 0.1... ‘se sl awa endl ted [aaslfeacel se speed ee . Virgulatus, Bow. cise feceaferfeeferferefeectee . Varians, Bow......ccve dishes slewdl ena beast] sie . viridans, Bow. .......+ sealed . aureus (Montagu)...... as wedlaan . armaturus, Bow. ...... céalhosilaae| deltas ees . callosus, Bow. ... . plumiger, Bow.......... ~ . subereus (Montagu)... . carnosus (Johns.)...... onl tas gelatinosus, Bow....... saahacaloau [ene [bee] aeal eat |ves estas feelers Faas +: and F444: ++i +i: +: coe + oA aT “er ++: ++ifiiiii: + +: + DE + Dit: 2 ++: ee ee >Hi ttpiiiiiiipiiii: cel ee: ee ee an Ze +: P+++ F++ ++: Det: $42: +: a D+t+++: + ++ ++ + +: +: +: +44: ++ ++ ++ 20 BRITISH SPONGIADA. N. Scotland and Orkney. E. Scotland. | W. Scotland and Hebrides. Shetland. Clyde District. N. Ireland. W. Ireland. 8S. Ireland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Devon and Cornwall. S. England. Channel Islands. BE. England. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. Abyssal. 1—50 fathoms. Littoral HYMENIACIDON— (continued). 40. foliatus, Bow............ sae leveilloaea 41. ficus (Johns.)............ Sl A Oo ol 42. sulphureus, Bean...... oa | Pe oe ee ++: 48, Dujardinii Johns.) ...)...|../..|-+\..)ccdededl-F lo, BattTERSBYIA. HALicHONDRIA. 1, MacIntoshii, Bow, ...)...J...)+)ojc.). fed. 2. regularis, Bow.......... sual eased ce [aan [aval ewe |e elaa "3. caduca, Bow........00... Ser Pee ee ee eee Feed El 4, inconspicua, Bow,..... sella eis Pee cel eel ga-a [Eae +i: mutulus, Bow. ......... bo ciel sire ae Bok Rell spall aah cylindracea, Bow....... lca] 34d fedl at] [waa nan [ool cos . panicea (Pallas) ...... cote al cad ell cs cl fe . glabra, Bow. ............ ecalviashns sfacalaet leeataxs)ime| ae af 1]. angulata, Bow.......... nies lagcltvitl cial scl acs badfesctscon 12. distorta, Bow. ...,..... 3 cif easdllcnifeas [wal ee fa 13. edusa, Bow. ............ al 14, ambigua, Bow.......... is 15. Couchii, Bow... sol hea ict | [al vom heed sete (Mall eze 16. Robertsoni, Bow....... 17. condensa, Bow........., ate cara nes lasial ans self icons aga 18. coralloides, Bow. ...... alka aes ray SODA 22. subdola, Bow...,........ sscil obec valle [avs At andar ae ese 23. foliata, Bow... ./#f...[.. ~ aioe eg Dt: 43. celatus (Grant) ......... Bi cvcfecst=E fice] oeedeas |22-[F leeela've 44, claviger, Bow. ......... Bea aa enall oc Ee [eee PABA |e sles esac a favie| sins 45. tenebrosus, Bow. ...... aif san dal ainal| ss ewe | AR'| acid nivel goats lateall wad san 46. subclavatus, Bow...... call sdsgal Sarl ell ask teats [Daze cees| Heel ecdeine Ie eel bee 47, paupertas, Bow......... Ene ce cll eal se [asad aca hice see] marcas lal dey +: +44: D+ +444: +: + 1. Bucklandi, Bow. ..,... sedecdedefeeledbfchedaefe. ~++ + . incerta, Bow............. aoleadlee laslaselibvaliestevlees loc aes . coalita (Grant) ......... ba OE be A Oe ee Pe ed roti it Pape? fort +4: 4 ese Te 22 eels ++ 19. Thompsoni, Bow.......)...)./...)0/ (4) 20. forceps, Bow............ =H legs brs [erga hie asin cal dart [naa bel Ss Persad sect eM aca lows 21. simplex, Bow..........., A isto [sic fis [raced warns |" Hace eel owl ares lacell onelisee = 24, corrugata, Bow......... usaf afoul snaleanl et eee fofeal loa GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION. 21 | N. Scotland and Orkney. | Shetland. W. Scotland and Hebrides. Clyde District. BE. Scotland. N. Ireland. W. Ireland. S. Ireland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Devon and Cornwall. S. England. Channel Islands. EK. England. Abyssal. Littoral. | 1—50 fathoms. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. —_ SOON DOU OOD HaLicHonpRia— (continued). . faleula, Bow............. oe . flabellifera, Bow. ... ..|...}... . incrustans (Hsper.) ... . candida, Bow. ......... in| aeehaddkiasleealat . irregularis, Bow. ...... en eee . Dickiei, Bow............. . Pattersoni, Bow. ......)+]... . pulchella, Bow.......... belted . Ingalli, Bow............. sir |psas . scandens, Bow.......... . Batei, Bow............066. . nigricans, Bow.......... ba . albula, Bow. ............ . expansa, Bow. . virgea, Bow. ...... Aisa eeatacss | . granulata, Bow......... vas jade [isa te lessons . farinaria, Bow. .........J..Jecfefee . inornata, Bow. ......... IsopIcTya. . cinerea (Grant)......... . permollis, Bow......... ea lai . mammeata, Bow....... fst ramusculus, Bow. ferula, Bow. ............ sas haan cael aie fede a . rosea, Bow. ........000 sail aval cael onal idl esis itell eae “a »pygmea, Bow. cc. fede feecdeeefecfeerfeeefees . obscura, Bow. ......... oes . indefinita, Bow... . indistincta, Bow....... sis [IT sos foal wee la . simplex, Bow. ......... bucllnac leash weall tis ban j . pocillum, Bow....,..... sill Roce os auealf ami Fee tw | ev . luteosa, Bow. ......... site lodial v3 = gnalass eealeealex . anomala, Bow. ......... staclloase] eve alleles bowls kop . parasitica; Bow. ...... wa . Peachii, Bow............ ie . varians, Bow. ......... evatvierelkaut gietloat . elegans, Bow. i.e feffeeeecfes + ri+ eercgi sk St: me D+: 2 eee © SEES Di ee + DE ++: +: eee Pete: + ee os = 22 BRITISH SPONGIADE. W. Scotland and Hebrides. Clyde District. N. Scotland and Orkney. N. Ireland. E. Scotland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Shetland. W. Ireland. S. Ireland. Devon and Cornwall. S. England. Channel Islands. E. England. Littoral. 1—50 fathoms. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. IsopicTya (continued). | 19. fallax, Bow. .....cs000 seal lecasul ead] sal ecl| sad sex ooea| wee eaaleasd late eae ezelley 20. MacAndrewi, Bow ...|...] PJ. |...befeee Pe el eee) eee ee 21, fistulosa, Bow. ......... be sas bas aie Paes |aatel fe bees lee | cae] sa of He deeos hewll Se 22. dichotoma, Bow. ...... Led bctalscsat eluate lca bonall cea san Shas ase bealfncy 23. perplexa, Bow. ......... Fer Pee ey Pe Pere dems] oxallzaiel ens laviel coil ls 24, densa, Bow. .... ; 25. Gregorii, Bow 26. pallida, Bow... 27. simulans (Johns 28, Ingalli, Bow.. 29. incerta, Bow,. sia dens (ak Al zeeats 30. crassa, Bow............. vealiea |naatoaalE fe 31. Bowerbanki, Normami...|...|...|...)...[... 32. filamenta, Bow. ...... ELL asl el ceal eee 33. paupercula, Bow....... iatsleas fusibeasel| extol tat 84. clava, Bow. w...cccecee austesa |e leah 35. jugosa, Bow. .........00 Ga Cee ce Peel ee be 36. palmata (Johns.) ...... So eal ee heel ee 37. trunca, Bow. ............ Fee Ren neo ee eck: 38. infundibuliformis (Johns.)|+}...).. JIA] jeecfedenfedee. 39. dissimilis, Bow.......... sees | et fowl] at andl ce lose ota 8 wacche'ot [Fe heaellead lle 40, gracilis, Bow. ......... wir] onesie oan] a] Fel gala | san| patel tre] eae eee [lve 41, invalida, Bow. ......... siva sins foal neal saa] evel Phe valece| Pl eaaleoddeddaaddh 42, Normani, Bow.......... a3 ie | P| ecitl cna] aah | cadens] ieslasaftanl se lee long 43. coriacea, Bow. ......... visall aes fase eee aaaa se emel ace PR seed eae oe ol 44, hispida, Bow. ......... eats Lato [al vroe] ae] saa fepetee | oe [caalfpand coe 45, fucorum (Johns.)...... Soe Ps 46, Alderi, Bow. .......0.... scoala ed ag bea steel awe ees |e leche 47, Hdwardii, Bow.......... us| ons [leas eeafiasfonabiwslone 48. lobata (Montagu) ...... ial 060 [ales ete onal ate [ogialews tes 49. paupera, Bow. ......... vatican | loeeteans| eateleaalhie cFnc 50. uniformis, Bow. ...... nicalf vex [aoa call eaallose lessee se 51, Clarkei, Bow............ tialuoal A [selves exe | elewa| acl sodtees| este laaalfaas 52, Barleei, Bow.,........... +I... . saal Seale ui iasl| ome axeleas| as u ‘ 53. laciniosa, Bow. ......... Hep hefefeeefeas 54, dubia, Bow. ...ccccseses S cal earlante leak 55. imitata, Bow... dal estoealoselee 56, nodosa, Bow... asain nait| cal ais lainal ine ++ + fi: + Pete ee eee fie fi ++: eA) al cable tha Goes D++4: : ++ :E: +i: DFE +4444 44: GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION. W. Scotland and Hebrides. Clyde District. N. Ireland. St. George’s Channel, &c. Devon and Cornwall. N. Scotland and Orkney. E. Scotland. S. England. Channel Islands. E. England. Abyssal. Shetland. W. Ireland. | Littoral. 8. Ireland. 50—100 fathoms. 100—500 fathoms. 1—50 fathoms. Isopictya (continued). 57. involuta, Bow. ......... ata aate| vale] sie | ta 58. pertenuis, Bow......... siva [uaid| ent ste aa FOG 59. scitula, Bow. ... 60. collina, Bow. lawl leeradaeeelReal aa lar ialandllied 61. Beanii, Bow. ............ sdidlecee| avi ent top| oc da | ail Sayed ba 62. funalis, Bow.......... 4. ndultatel sive easel eed oe (aialnclal aed 63. Hyndmani, Bow....... swilece| elias fowdbaeat ef eaad Elis wfece{F HL. 64. lurida, Bow. ......60. atv [sna sired cselaatl| sae Srved esial eat teewatsing [ese lsc | +: +: ++i +++ + + ease ++ 66. tumulosa, Bow.......... sas sicalfessn{ oe 9|leaielle’es [siei|liauilevate 67. rugosa, Bow..........65 seve (tae heer ara estal ese [alec neciel paiel Ra all Ae [ses laced one |e 68. implicita, Bow. ......... ssc t asa ecia] S:6 am opel | HPHiloen) wael uel oa ead foree'f nate le 69. inzequalis, Bow.......... 70. deformis, Bow. ......... ciod| oa castle va heal aos] vol ease vee gaa feel as = RAPHIODESMA. 1. floreum, Bow. ......... Se ee 2. lingua, Bow. .......00.. Eo she hcallaesall oe 8. simplicissimum, Bow,|...|...|.../+]...]. 4, sordidum, Bow.......... a feat |e wats al 5. fallaciosum, Bow....... wileas (oaalbatlaaa}tngs 6. intermedium, Bow. ...)...)...J..Jcdee $+: fot $+ bot SPONGILLA. 1, fluviatilis (Pallas) ...Jo) dele fecfer 2. Parfitti, Carter......... ss lbesal asi soll na’ eos lane Lo eteag 8. lacustris (Don.)......... doitlesalaas fade veal coal th [ess fel esa AR 4, sceptrifera, Bow. ......cefecfeefeccfecfeerferfee fee ++ DESMACIDON. 2. Jeffreysii, Bow.......... eee eee ete peel ee ce 8. Peachti, Bow.........0. AE cdl lege gall aapl ed hace ante) aatetieas beer basil ts 4, constrictus, Bow....... se claws heweloga vba Easel icaaifss'sestlaas leat lear [ie 5. incognitus, Bow. ...... se s|heae| een hae] sae basal es [Sas eae et alco aies fae ce 6. pannosus, Bow.......... felis clisafiee|eeu|saslune level eve] vaeleasl Flees ivallaas ++ +f 65. fimbriata, Bow.......... Fe bel eses| ha a aera eit furgalllndsn| ena cual ede ater sas) dail ees si + 1. fruticosus (Montagu).|+|...J..feefedefecfeefee] Fl] b] led. 24 BRITISH SPONGIADAL, n elf oe a E £| |8 Zi BH} 1a Ala Oo; ja E|E . | jo 3 : q Ais ols Z a S halaie 2 (> ble eg g JERS Sle s/Ssleic/g| | [a SSISSIS (S/S (8/2 Slo ls) ts a a/S/S/S lA) slolals 0] & |"anl e|5 S/8/8|8le/s HIS Blais aleislo aa el Gel Mele eb eRe IK ele | .l43 rl . emt ale aE IS lei es ONS] 4 DESMACIDON (continued), 1. pulchella (Sowerby)... CHALINA. . limbata (Montagu) . Grantii, Bow...... BONITO OUR 09 DOR OPHLITASPONGIA, VERONGIA. 1, Zetlandica, Bow. ...... |DysIpHa,. 1, fragilis (Montagu) . oculata (Pallas) ......|...)... . cervicornis (Pallas)...}...]...J+!...[...)... » Montagui (Flem.)......|...)...J.f..). pt. . Flemingii, Bow......... azaleton| alae etl coal tl og . gracilenta, Bow. ..... alt essa| ganeleetlhets . inornata, Bow.......... eee 1. papilla, Bow............, avel ene 2. coriacea, Bow. ......... nos (26 [izwall octal gatel eee 7. copiosus, Bow. ......... eal is ee 8. cavernula, Bow. ....0.)+] fff Ep ee 9. rotalis, Bow. ............ seve cae aioe oa etc Latte eal aon (ae | EE 10. similaris, Bow. ......... shall 2a] ce Peat ce stan] Pe ee feat local tone ll. egagrophilus(Scowler)|...|...)...)...)d.(4)./ PIE + 12. columella, Bow......... BPs Be Br be ee oe Be RAPHYRUS, 1. Griffithsii, Bow......... +h... ae ot eel ed a DIPLODEMIA. 1. vesicula, Bow. ......... fl: SPONGIONELLA. ene e: 7 Di +44: + =: Ee: ae +++: ++ +i: 2 3 ++ ++ + + +++ + | 50—100 fathoms. . | 100—500 fathoms. 96 15 27 33/13) 10/97 2 |45,72/60 91/47 {80 1 59 33) BRITISH SPONGIAD ZL. Class—PORIFERA. OrpErr I.—CALCARBEA, 1, 160. Genus 1.—Grantia, Fleming, 1, 162; 1, 1. . Grantia compressa (O. Fab.), u, 17; 1, Pl. XXI, figs. 312—314.; 111, Pl. I, figs. 1—12. . Grantia ormmata (O. Fab. ?), 1, 19; 1, Pl. XXVI, figs. 345, 346a; 1, Pl. II, figs. 1—15. . Grantia ENsATA, Bow., u, 25; ur, Pl. II, figs. 16—20. . Grantia tesseLATA, Bow., u, 26; 1, Pl. XVII, fig. 286; 1, Pl. I, figs. 21—27. Genus 2.—Lxucosotenta, Bow., 1, 164; m1, 2. _ LEUCOSOLENIA BOTRYOIDES, Hllis and Sol., u, 28; 1, Pl. XXVI, figs. 347, 348; 1, Pl. III, figs. 1—4. _ Levcosonenta contorta, Bow., 11, 29; 11, Pl. TI, figs. 5—10. 26 BRITISH SPONGIADA. 3. Levcosotenta Lacunosa (Johnston), u, 32; m1, Pl. IV, figs. 1—8. 4 LEUOOSOLENIA coRrIacEA (Fleming), 11, 84; 1, Pl. ITI, figs. 11—14. Genus 3,—Lxvoonra, Grant, 1, 164; u, 2. 1. Levoonta nivua (Fleming), 1, 86; 1, Pl. V, figs. 1—8. 2. Lzvconia FistuLosa (Johnston), 11, 89; m1, Pl. V, figs. 9—16. 3. Levoonia PumiLa, Bow., 11, 41; m1, Pl. VI, figs. 1—5. 4, Levconta Somest!, Bow., 111, 334; Pl. XCI, figs.6—17. Genus 4.—Luucoeyrrsta, Bow., 1, 165; m1, 2. Levoocypsta Gosstt, Bow., 1, 42; Pl. XXVI, figs. 349, 350; 11, Pl. VI, figs. 6—8. GEODIA. 27 Orver II.—SILICEA, 1, 166; II, 3. Susorper I.—1, 166; 1, 3. Genus 5.—Grop1a, Lamarck, 1, 167 ; 1, 3. Gropia ZeTLaNDIoA, Johnston, u, 45; wt, Pl. VII, figs. 1—10. 1867 Cydoniwm Miilleri, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 548, 1870 Geodia Zetlandica, Schmidt. Grunziige einer Spongien des Atlantischen Gebietes, p. 76. Carter has described three forms of Geodia from the “Porcupine” dredgings, but does not record G. Zet- landica as having been met with in that expedition. His Geodia megastrella, however, appears to come very near to Johnston’s species. May it not be the same? The chief difference appears to be that G. Zetlandica is described by Bowerbank as having not only fusiformi- acerate skeleton spicula, but also “ fusiformi-acuates,” while the latter do not occur in G. megastrella. It is, however, worthy of notice, that although these spicula are described in Vol. IT, no figure is given of them in Vol. ILI; did our author find that he had made a mistake with respect to these spicules? But granted the presence of fusiformi-acuates along with the fusi- formi-acerates of G. Zetlandica, and their absence in G. megastrella, would this character be necessarily of specific importance in this: group of sponge? If the reader will turn a few pages on to the description of 28 BRITISH SPONGIADA. + the forms of Tethya cranium, he will find a so-called variety of that species named acufera, which differs from the typical cranium in exactly the same manner as Geodia Zetlandica is distinguishable from G. megastrella, namely, by an intermixture of fusiformi-acuate with the usual fusiformi-acerate skeleton spicula. Genus 6.—Pacuymatisma, Bow., 1,171; u, 38. PaouymMatismMA JoHNSTONIA, Bow., u, 51; 1, Pl. I, figs. 15,17, 20,21; PL IL, figs. 45,46; PL. IV, fig. 93; PL. VI, figs. 158, 159; Pl. XXIV, figs. 330—332 ; Pl. XXVII, fig. 353; 1, Pl. VIII, figs. 1—7. 1869 Pachymatisma Johnstonia, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv, p. 8, pl. ii, figs, 7—18. 1873 Caminus osculatus, Grube. Mittheil. i. St. Malo u. Roscoff, &., p. 132, Taf. ii, figs. 3, 3 a—e. Procured by me in 1867 in “ Will Hellyer,” a cave * at the most northern point in the British Islands, the headland on the east side of Burrafirth in the island of Unst, Shetland. This cave, which is always filled by the sea, cannot possibly be entered except in the calmest weather ; and the Sponge having been caught sight of at its furthest extremity, was at length procured, though not without incurring some danger. This is the only instance of its occurrence in Shetland (N.). Budleigh-Salterton (Carter). Genus 7.—Normanta, Bow., 111, 258. 1868 Normania, Bowerbank. In Last Report of Dredging among the Shetland Isles; Norman on the Porifera (Brit. Assoc. Rep.), 1868, p. 328, NORMANIA. 29 Normanta crassa, Bow., 1, 258; Pl. LXXXI, figs. 1— Le. is 1868 Normania crassa, Bowerbank. Last Report of Dredging among the Shetland Isles; Norman on the Porifera (Brit. Assoc. Rep.), 1868, p. 328. The type-specimens were dredged in 110 fathoms 20—25 miles N.N.H. of Burrafirth Lighthouse, Shet- land; but the small specimens mentioned (III, 262) are erroneously recorded by the author as from Shetland. They were dredged by me in company with Dr. Gwyn Jeffreys in the Minch in 1866. Mr. Carter (‘ Ann. Nat. Hist.,’ ser. 5, vol. ii, 1878, p. 176) has stated that “the type-specimen of Dr. Bowerbank’s Normania crassa is only a sessile form of Tethya muricata, in every respect similar to one which was dredged up on board H.M.S8. ‘Porcupine.’ Tethya muricata is better known as Wyvillethomsonia Wallichii, a sponge which will, after bearing many synonyms, probably have to settle down as Thenea mwuricata (Bow). Mr. Carter speaks very confidently respecting the type of Normania crassa, a sponge which is in my cabinet, and which he has never seen, but he has fallen into an extraordinary error. I know not well how two sponges belonging to the same group could well be more distinct than the two, which he would thus syno- nymise. They not only differ altogether in all external characters, but their spicula are wholly different. Without going into further detail it will suffice to state that the most characteristic ‘‘ attenuato-expando- ternate”’ bifurcating connecting and defensive spicules of Thenea, figured by Bowerbank (‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ 1872, pl. v, fig. 4) and by Kent (‘ Month. Micros. Jour.,’ vol. iv, 1870, pl. lxvi, figs. 6, 7) the “ simple attenuato- 30 BRITISH SPONGIADA. expando-ternates,” Bow., fig. 3, Kent., fig. 7a, and the “recurvo-ternates,” Kent, figs. 8, 9, are altogether absent in Normania, where their place is taken by the “large subfusiformi-acerates” and the “small subfusiformi-acerates,” Bow., ‘Brit. Spong.,’ 11, Pl. LXXXI, figs. 4 and 9, and the peculiar “ abnormal forms of connecting spicula,” figs. 6, 7,8. Indeed the only point in which the two sponges agree is that both are furnished with “ stellates.” Genus 8.—Hotonemia, Bow., 1, 173; 1, 4. Ecronemtia, Bow., June, 1862 — StecLeTta, Schmidt, 1862. 1. Eoronemia compressa, Bow., u, 55; 111, 19; Pl. IX, figs. 1—12. 2. EctonEMIA PONDEROSA, Bow., 11, 56; mI, 352; and Pl. VITI, figs. 8—15. 1871 Stelletia aspera, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vii, p. 7, pl. iv, figs. 7—14. There can, I think, be no doubt that the sponge found by Mr. Carter at Straight Point, Budleigh- Salterton, and described by him in the ‘Annals’ under the name Stelletta aspera, is Bowerbank’s Hcionemia ponderosa. Mr. Carter’s figures of the spicula very closely resemble those of the last-named species, and the fact that he did not find the small doliolate spicula is of little moment, as they might have easily escaped him. In Heionemia compressa the doliolate spicula were not recorded in the description in Vol. II, and ECIONEMIA, 31 were only discovered after a “searching examination ” (IIT, p. 19). 3. Ectonzmia coacrura, Bow., m1, 269; Pl. LXXXII, figs. 13—19. Genus 9.—Potymastia, Bow., 1,177; u, 5. 1. Potymastia ornata, Bow., 11, 58; 1, 20, Pl. IX, figs. 13—16. 2. PoLymastia BULBOSA, Bow., 11, 61; 101, Pl. X, figs. 1—4, 3. PotymasTia RoBusTA, Bow., 11, 62; 1, Pl. X, figs. 58. 1861 Huplectella robusta, Bow. List British Marine Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. Habitat.—Dredged in Birterbuy Bay, Connemara, by Mr. D. Robertson and myself in 1874 (N.). 4, PotyMAstTIA BREVIS, Bow., u, 64; 1, Pl. XXIX, fig. 8358; 11, 25; Pl. XI, figs. 1—9. 1861 uplectella brevis, Bow. List Brit. Marine Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1868 Quasillina brevis, Norman. Last Report Dred. Shetland Isles (Brit. Assoc, Rep.), p. 329. In the British Association’s ‘Report’ of 1868 will be found the grounds on which I established the genus Quasillina to receive this species, and in Vol. ITI, p. 26, 32 BRITISH SPONGIADA. Dr. Bowerbank gave his reasons for not recognising that genus. Let others decide the matter. This is not the occasion to defend my. own views, but I may be allowed to observe that my description was not based on a single specimen, as my old friend seems to imply. I certainly have seen a far larger number of specimens, and those, too, fresh from the sea, than ever passed in a dried condition through his hands. 5. PoLyMastia SPINULA, Bow., 11, 66; 1, 27; Pl. XI, figs. 10—13. Habitat.—Dredged in Birterbuy Bay, Connemara, 1874 (N.). 6. Potymastia RADIOSA, Bow., 1, 68; 11, 28; Pl. XI, figs. 14—18. 7. PonyMastiA MAMMILLARIS (Muller). 1861 Euplectella mammilaris, Bow. List Brit. Marine Invert. (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1867 Pencillaria mammillaris, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 527. Habitat.—Polperro, Cornwall; three miles off Dun- stanborough, Northumberland; the Minch; Birterbuy Bay, Connemara (N.). Among the specimens from the last-named locality is one of an oval form, and a little more than an inch in length, embedded in a mass of Raphyrus Grifithsic, which completely covers, inside and out, the gibbous valve of a Pecten maximus. Another fine large example from the same dredgings is about three POLYMASTIA. 33 and a half inches in diameter, almost entirely covering the external surface of the flat valve of a Pecten mazi- mus. This sponge has about one hundred and fifty fistula; and on the inside of the valve of the Pecten are three or four very thin circular or oval spots of the same sponge in a very young state, before any fistular appendages are developed. 8. Potymastia contcERA, Bow., 1, 192; Pl. LXXTI, figs. 13—16. Genus 10.—Hatypuysema, Bow., 1,179; u, 5. (= Squamvtina, Carter, but not of Schultze.) 1. Hatypoysema Tumanowiczi, Bow., 0, 76; 1, Pl. XXX, fig. 359. 1866 1868 1870 1877 1877 1877 1877 1878 1878 VOL IV. Haliphysema Tumanowiczii, O. Schmidt. Zweite Sup- plement d. Spong. d. Adriatischen Meeres, p. 13, pl. i, fig. 13 (copy from Bowerbank). Halyphysema Tumanowiczii, Parfitt. Trans. Devon. Assoc. Sci. Lit. and Art., p. 14 (separate copy) ; and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. v, vol. i (1878), p. 88. Squamulina scopula, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. v, p. 310, pl. iv, figs. 1—11; and vol. xx (1877), p. 337; ser. 5, vol. i (1878), p. 172; vol. iii (1879), p. 407. Haliphysema primordiale, Haeckel. Biologische Stu- dien, p. 180, pl. ix. Haliphysema Tumanowicati, Haeckel. 1. ¢., p. 192. Gastrophysema dithalamium, Haeckel. 1. ¢., p. 196, pls. xii—xiv. Gastrophysema scopula, Haeckel. 1. c., p. 206. Squamulina scopula, Kent. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. i, p. 1. Haliphysema Tumanowiczii, Norman. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. i, p. 274. 3 34 BRITISH SPONGIADA, 1878 Haliphysema Twmanowiczii, Kent. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. ii, p. 68, pls. iv and v. 1879 Haliphysema Tumanowicaii, H. B. Brady. Quart. Journ. Mice. Sci., N. &., vol. xix, p. 50. 1880 Haliphysema Tumanowiczii, Lankester. Quart. Journ. Mic. Sci., N.S., vol. xix, p. 475, p. xxii. Habitat.— Attached to fronds of Rhodymenia, Torbay (Parfitt) ; Budleigh-Salterton (Carter); Jersey (Kent); Bergen, Norway (Haeckel) ; ‘‘ H. primordiale,” Medi- terrannean, Corsica (Haeckel); “G. dithalamium,” Mediterranean, Smyrna (Haeckel). The genus Haliphysema has been the subject of much controversy of recent years, for the full under-- standing of which the reader is referred to the several papers which are enumerated in the syonymy. It will suffice here briefly to allude to the views entertained by the respective authors. Dr. Bowerbank described Haliphysema at first not only as a sponge, but as presumably a sponge which secreted its own siliceous spicula. In the second volume of this work, however, after he had received from me the type-specimens of H. ramulosa, he dis- tinctly stated that the skeleton consists of “an incor- poration of fragments of spicula of various shapes and sizes and of minute grains of sand.’”’ This fact I had pointed out to him in my letters. Mr. Carter was the first to maintain that Haliphy- sema had been wrongly placed among the sponges, and that it should be located among the Rhizopoda. He found grounds for this opinion in the pseudo-septate character of the attached base of the organism, which, he argued, showed its alliance with the Foraminifera, and from the fact that on cutting an individual in two sarcode escaped which exhibited amoeboid motions. HALIPHYSEMA. 35 Professor Haeckel next entered in the field, and published an elaborate essay illustrated with a number of plates. He apparently proved to demonstration that Haliphysema could be nothing else than a sponge, and he assigned it to that position, and as one of the simplest forms of the Coelenterata. He described and figured Haliphysema as having a hollow interior every- where lined with the “ flagellated cells” or “ collar- bearing monads”’ characteristic of sponges; furnished, moreover, with a curious single spiral line of such flagellated cells of much greater size than the rest, while at the bottom of the cavity he described and figured ovate objects which were regarded as eggs. No one at this time could have reasonably supposed anything else than that Haeckel had clearly proved Haliphysema to be a low type of sponge. Meanwhile I had myself procured certain organisms from my own dredgings off Valentia and from material brought up the “ Porcupine” from considerable depths in the Atlantic. These appeared to me, on the one hand, so nearly to resemble Haliphysema that they could scarcely belong to a different class, and, on the other, so closely approaching many of the Lituolidan Foraminifera that no line of demarcation seemed pos- sible. In a paper in the ‘Annals’ I summarised what was known and had been written respecting Haliphy- sema retaining its place, in consequence of Haeckel’s apparently conclusive proofs among the sponges, but criticising the genera and species which he had insti- tuted. In this paper I described the allied organisms under the names Technitella and Marsipella as “genera incerte sedis.’ I did not dare to separate them from the Foraminifera to which they appeared to me to be 36 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. united by a series of uninterrupted links, while on the other hand Technitella appeared more closely allied to Haliphysema than to any other animal known to me. Shortly after this Mr. Kent, who felt most anxious to see with his own eyes what Haeckel had described and figured of the animal of Haliphysema, sought dili- gently for and succeeded in finding it at Jersey. After most careful examination of living examples, he astonished zoologists by a paper, in which he stated that a “‘ rigid examination with the aid of a magnifying power of from 800 to as muchas 2000 diameters, failed to reveal the existence of any structure corresponding with the collar-bearing flagellate zooids of ordinary sponges”? such as had been figured by Haeckel. On the other hand, he witnessed such extended, delicate, and anastomosing pseudopodial action of the sarcode in the living animal, and altogether such a structure of the granular mass which occupied the whole of the interior, as to convince him that Haliphysema must be and could be nothing else than a Foraminifer. . Mr. Ray Lankester commenced his observations under the impression that it was impossible that the Professor of Jena could have so accurately figured and described what had in reality no existence; and he presumed, therefore, that what Haeckel had witnessed had escaped the observation of Mr. Kent. After close and most careful investigation of numerous living and preserved examples sent to him from Jersey, he found Mr. Kent’s observations to be confirmed in every par- ticular, and that the “ core”’ or central portion of Hali- physema within the crust of spicula and sand grains ‘is a continuous mass of protoplasm, exhibiting no central cavity and devoid of ‘ cell-structure.’” Scat- HALIPHYSEMA. a7 tered in the protoplasm are an immense number of vesicular bodies averaging 755th inch in diameter, the walls of which are thick and their contents granular or else hyaline. Mr. Lankester suggests that these may be called “ vesicular nuclei.” At the basal portion of the core were egg-like bodies of protoplasm of much larger size than the vesicular nuclei, varying from the ziropth to the =jpth of an inch in diameter. In no part of the body-substance could he find ‘‘ evidence of any axial cavity comparable to the enteron of higher animals, nor the slightest trace of a breaking up of the protoplasm into areas or units corresponding to cells, with the exception of the egg-like bodies of the ante- terior region ;” and the whole organisation points to its relationship to the Foraminifera. Dr. K. Mébius is athird witness. He has confirmed the observations of Kent and Lankester from the examination of living specimens procured at the Mauritius, and placed the genus among the Forami- nifera. Mr. H. B. Brady, in his recent observations of classi- fication of the Foraminifera in “ Notes on some of the Reticularian Rhizopoda of the ‘ Challenger’ Expedi- tion” (‘ Quart. Jour. Mic. Sci.,’ N. 8., vol. xxi, 1880, p. 13), has placed Haliphysema together with my genera Technitella and Marsipella in the Family Astrorhizide ; and here it appears to me, according to our present knowledge, is its most proper position. Although, however, Haliphysema would seem to have with our present knowledge no proper locus standi in the present volume, it is right that it should be left here in deference to what were Dr. Bowerbank’s views to the time of his death. 38 BRITISH SPONGIAD. 2. Hatypuysema RaMuLosA, Bow., 1, 79; 1, Pl. XIII, fig. 1. 1870 Halyphysema ramulosa, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. v, p. 389. 1870 Squamulina scopula (“ branched variety”), Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, p. 345. 1877 Haliphysema ramulosa, Haeckel. Biologische Studien, p. 193, 1878 Haliphysemaramulosa, Norman. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. v, vol. i, p. 276. 1880 Haliphysema Tumanowiczii, Mobius. Beitrage zur Meeres Fauna der Insel Mauritius und den Seychel- len, p. 72, pls. i and ii, fig. 1. Habitat.— Among: sponges and on rocks, between tidemarks, Budleigh-Salterton, Devon, Mr. Carter. Off coast of Florida, U.S., dredged by Pourtales (fide Schmidt). Roundstone Bay, Ireland (Norman). The finest specimen I have seen of H. ramulosa is one for which I am indebted to the kindness of Mr. Carter, and which, from a pedicel of almost a quarter of an inch high, becomes suddenly multiramose, and terminates in seventeen heads,* Genus 11.—Ctocatyrta, Bow., 1,179; 11, 5. 1. CriocaLypTa PENICILLUS, Bow., u, 81; 1, Pl. XXX, fig. 360; PI. XITI, figs. 2—4. 1870 Awinella penicillus, Schmidt. Spongien Fauna des Atlant. Gebietes, p. 76. 2. Crocatypta Ler, Bow., 11, 296; Pl. LXXXVI, figs. 1—4, * This specimen will be figured in Mr. H. B. Brady’s forthcoming volume on the “ Challenger ” Foraminifera. TETHYA,. 39 Genus 12.—Trtuya, Lamarck, 1,181; u, 6. 1, Teraya oranium, Lamarck, 11, 83; 1, Pl. IV, figs. 77 —82; Pl. XXV, fig. 843; Pl. XXXI, fig. 362; mu, Pl. XIV, figs. 1—6; Pl. LXXXIX, figs. 5—8. 1870 Tetilla cranium, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant., Geb., p. 76. 1872 Tethya Zetlandica, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ix, p. 417, pl. xxii, figs. 1—6, 13—17. Tethya cranium, Carter. Loc. cit., pl. xxii, figs. 9—12. ,1875 Tethya cranium, vars. abyssorum and infrequens, Carter, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, p. 405, pl. xvi, fig. 49 (abyssorum), and fig. 48 (infrequens). Habitat.—Dredged in deep water in the Minch in company with Phakellia ventilabrum, Isodictya infun- dibuliformis and laciniosa, and Normania crassa, which are also its companions in the deep waters of the Shetland Seas (N.). Either there must be an extraordinary amount of variation in the character of the spicula of this sponge, or there are in the seas around the British Islands very closely allied species which, while agreeing in general character, may be distinguished by certain variations in their spicula. It is not without much hesitation that I here regard these forms as variations of a single species. So regarded, I cannot but feel that they give a very serious warning against basing specific character on minute spicular differentiation ; and in these volumes a large number of species are established on the ground of minute spicular variation. At the same time it must be carefully borne in mind that in all other classes of animals the amount of plasticity of form and structure varies immensely, even in kindred species ; and the fact that one animal or plant varies almost endlessly does 40 BRITISH SPONGIADA. not enable us to predicate that a closely allied form will prove similarly unstable in its characters ; on the contrary, it may prove exceptionally constant to its type. ~ A very important question still remains unanswered among the sponges, viz. What amount of variation in the form and proportionate size of spicula may be re- garded as consistent with specific character? No doubt the amount of such variation will, as I have suggested, be found to differ greatly in different genera and species. Future observations must determine whether the divergencies here considered as varietal in Tethya craniwm should or should not be rather reckoned as specific. It will be easy in such latter case to employ the names here used to designate the several varieties as indicative instead of species. Dr. Bowerbank first pointed out that the numerous specimens of Tethya cranitwm which he had examined contained two sorts of gemmules, “ which are always grouped together” (11, p. 86). These two gemmules differ in their spicules, the first having only curved fusiformi-acerates; the second having, 1, curved fusiformi-acerates ; 2, attenuato-porrecto-ternates ; 3, attenuato-bihamates or unihamates. And he considered it ‘‘ highly probable” that this difference in the struc- ture of the gemmules is sexual. In 1872 Mr. Carter, having examined a bottle-full of Tethya cranium which Dr. Bowerbank had presented to the British Museum, believed that they were divisible into two species, which he designated “cranium” and “ Zetlandica ;” Dr. Bowerbank declined (‘ Ann. Nat. Hist.’ ser. 4, vol. x, p. 58) to acknowledge -the validity of the grounds on which Carter established TETHYA. Al his T. Zetlandica ; and Mr. Carter himself now doubts whether that form is entitled to specific rank (‘ Ann. Nat. Hist.,’ ser. 4, vol. xviii, p. 471). I have spe- cimens in my collection which closely agree with the characters of Zetlandica, but I am inclined to regard them as craniwm in which the dermal membrane and subdermal sarcode with their bihamates have been washed away; while the consequently outstanding fasciculi of radiating porrecto- and recurvo-ternate spicula, of which the apices are broken off, give the sponge the ‘“thick-set papille’” which render it so different in appearance to the naked eye from the silky investiture of the same sponge when in fine condition. The differences in the gemmules appear to be those which had previously been noticed by Bowerbank. I now proceed to notice the forms which have been met with. TETHYA CRANIUM, var. 1, TYPICA. The externally protruded spicula, arranged in whorls like the hair of the human head, and presenting a hoary, shining, asbestine appearance. The sarcode, abundantly supplied with excessively minute sigmoid- bihamate spicula (magnified 1166 diameters, 11, Pl. XIV, fig. 5), measuring about g7's3 ich long. “ The spiral twist of the spicules and presence of bihamates are as characteristic of the young while still within the body of the mother as they are of the adult” (Carter). 42 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. TETHYA CRANIUM, var. 2, ZeTuanpica, Carter, |. c. Surface smooth, interrupted by thick-set papille irregularly disposed. Sarcode entirely without biha- ‘mates. The young within the body showing the same absence of bihamates, and having the spicules radiatingly arranged, but not spirally twisted (Carter). TETHYA CRANIUM, var. 8, acureRA, Norman. In most respects like the type, bihamates abundant ; along with the fusiformi-acerate spicula of the skeleton large numbers of fusiformi-acuates occur, consti- tuting perhaps one third of the number of skeleton spicula. A single specimen in my collection. TETHYA ORANIUM, var. 4, ABYssoRUM, Carter, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, 1876, p. 405, pl. xvi, fig, 49. Bihamates (zz'5oth inch long) twice as large as usual, and under % inch object glass seen to be covered with minute vertical spines. Abundant among the ‘Porcupine’ dredgings in the deep sea between the North of Scotland and the Farée Islands. TBTHY A. 43 TETHYA ORANIUM, var. 5, INFREQUENS, Carter, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, 1876, p. 405; pl. xvi, figs. 48 a—c. Porrecto-ternate spicula, of remarkable form, the prongs being distally truncated and slightly expanded, so as to form a cup-shaped excavation bordered by a serrated margin, while the central canal of the spi- culum on reaching the bottom of the cup-shaped cavity divides into a number of minute branches, one of which passes to each of the tooth-like processes on the margin of the cup. The recurvo-ternate spicules have the arms much more divergent, and not so re- curved as in the normal TJ. craniwm; and the usual bihamate flesh-spicules are altogether absent. This is certainly a most remarkable form. One specimen, “ Porcupine”? Expedition, 1869, No. 57, Lat. 60° 14’ N., Long. 6° 17 W., 632 fathoms, in the deep mid-channel between Scotland and Farée. Tethya cranium, Phakellia.ventilabrum, and Isodictya infundibuliformis, are all brought up in great abundance by the hooks of the Shetland long-line men, when fishing for torsk and cod on the Haaf Banks. When Dr. Bowerbank first commenced the study of British Sponges, the Tethya, &c., were considered extremely rare. Desirous of possessing these fine species, he wrote to the fishermen’s agent at the Out Skerries, and said he would give sixpence each for all that he could procure. No doubt our old friend thought the offer an uncommonly safe one; but in a short time a huge keg of Sponges came (300 Tethya, see 11, p. 84, among them !), and a nice little bill of . 44, BRITISH SPONGIADA. fifteen pounds. As he distributed his duplicates among his friends, he used to laugh over the story, which he told as a warning never to give an unlimited order. Of late years the same sort of lesson has been taught with respect to two other Sponges, Huplectella aspergillum, and Hyalonema mirabile. 2. Teraya Coninesi, Bow., 1, 87; 1, Pl. II, fig. 48; 1, Pl. XV, figs. 1—9. 1867 Collingsia Sarniensis, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 541. 1870 Stelletia Collingsii, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. Habitat.—On the under side of large stones at ex- treme low water, spring tides, at entrance of West- port Bay, Co. Mayo (N). 3. Treruya Scumipt, Bow., 1, 89; 11, Pl. XV, figs. 10—16. 1867 Collingsia Schmidtii, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 541. 1870 Stelletia Schmidtii, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 67. 4. Trraya Lynourtum (Linn.), 1, 92; 1, Pl. XXV, fig. 342 ; 111, Pl. XV, figs. 17—22. 1862 Tethya morwm and Lyncurium, Schmidt. Spong. Adri- atic Meeres, p. 44, 1867 Donatia aurantiwm, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 541. 1869 Tethya (Donatia, Gray) Lyncurium, Carter. Ann, Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv, p. 7, pl. ii, figs, 1—6, TETHYA, 45 1870 Tethya Lyncurium, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 67. Habitat—Tidemarks, Westport Bay, Co. Mayo; and Roundstone, Connemara (N.), Budleigh-Salterton (Carter). 5. Trtuya spinosa, Bow., 11, 279; Pl. LXXXIII, figs. 17—22. 6. Turnya spinvLaRIa, Bow., 1,94; 1, Pl. XV, figs. 23—30. 1867 Spinularia tetheoides, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 524. 1870 Radiella spinularia, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. Genus 18.—Hationemia, Bow., 1, 184; 1, 6. FTAA PATERA, Bow., 11, 96; 1, Pl. X, figs. 228— 233; Pl. XXXII, figs. 363, 364; m1, Pl. XV, figs. 31, 32. Genus 14.—DuicryocyLinprvus, Bow., 1, 185; 11, 6. 1. DicryocyninpRus VENTILABRUM, Bow., u, 100; 11, Pl. XVI, figs. 1—5. 1870 Dictyocylindrus ventilabrum, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. 2. DioryocytinpRus RaMosus (Mont.), u, 103; 1, Pl. XVI, figs. 6 -12. 1870 Raspailia ramosa, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. 46 BRITISH SPONGIAD. 3. Dictyocyzinprus Rapiosus, Bow., u, 105; m1, Pl. XX, figs. 5—9. 1870 Raspailia radiosa, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant, Geb., p. 76. 4. Dictrocytinprus Howser, Bow., m, 106; 1, PI. XIX, figs. 8—13. Habitat.—A specimen an inch and a quarter high, consisting of a short, bent pedicil, and three branched terminations, dredged in 10 fathoms, Birterbuy Bay (N.). 5. DicryocyLinprus uispipus (Mont.), 1, 108; 11, PI. XVII, figs. 1—5. 1870 Raspailia (viminalis ?), Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p.76. - Habitat——In 50 fathoms off Shetland, in company with D. stuposus (N.). 6. DioryocyLinpRus AcULEATUS, Bow., 11, 109; 11, 53; PL. XXI, figs. 5—12. 1867 Vibulinus aculeatus, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 545, 7. DIoTYooYLINDRUS FASCICULARIS, Bow., 1, 110; 111, Pl. XVIII, figs. 1—4. 1867 Adreus fascicularis, Gray. Proc. Zool. Suc., p. 545. 1870 Raspailia (stelligera P), Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. DICTYOCYLINDRUS. AC 8. DioryooyLinprus vireuLrosus, Bow., u, 1183; 11, Pl. XTX, figs. 14—18. 1870 Raspailia virgultosa, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. 1876 Dictyocylindrus virgultosus, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser, 4, vol. xviii, p. 234, pl. xii, fig. 5, and pl. xv, fig. 27. In the specimens procured in the ‘‘ Porcupine” Expedition to the Hast of Shetland in 64 and 75 fathoms, Mr. Carter has described and figured the large skeleton spicules as “large, acuate, smooth, sharp-pointed, curved suddenly or bent towards the large extremity.” In this last point these spicules differ from those described in this work from my type- specimens, but in all other respects the “ Porcupine” examples agree closely with those previously obtained. Similar variations, from straight-headed acuates to those which have the thick end much bent, occasionally occur in other species; for example, the club-headed spicula of Grantia compressa, which usually have the head much bent on one side, are occasionally found straight. 9. Dictyooyninprus pumitus, Bow., n, 114; m, Pl. XIX, fig. 19; Pl. XXI, figs. 1—4, 1870 Avinella pumila, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 70. Habitat. An example in fine condition was found growing on the arched under surface of a large stone at extreme low water, Westport Bay, Co. Mayo (N.). 48 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. 10. DicryvocyLinpevs stuposus (Mont.), 1, 116; m1, Pl. XIX, figs. 1—7. 1867 Vibulinus stwposus, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 545. 1870 Raspailia stuposa, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. Habitat.—In 50 fathoms, five miles East of Balta Island, Shetland, 1867; three miles off Dunstan- borough, Northumberland, 1864; the Minch, 1866; Birterbuy Bay, Connemara, 1874 (N.). 11. Diotyocytinprus RuGosus, Bow., 11, 119; m1, Pl. XX, figs. 1—4. 1870 Awinella rugosa, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. 12. DictyocyiinpRus REOTANGULUS, Bow., 11, 281; Pl. LXXXIV, figs. 1—7. Genus 15.—PHAKELLIA, Bow., 1, 186; m1, 7. 1, PaaKeLua RoBusTA, Bow., u, 120; m1, 54; PI. XXI, figs. 13—17. 2, PHAKELLIA VENTILABRUM (Johnston), 11, 122; 11, PI. XXII, figs. 1—7. 1866 Phakellia ventilabrum, Schmidt. Spong. Adriat. Meeres, zweites Supplement, p. 15, pl. i, fig. 16. 1870 Phakellia ventilabriwm, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 61. 1876 Phakellia ventilabrum, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. iv, vol, xviii, p. 239. Habitat.—Fine in deep water in the Minch (N.). It PHAKELLIA. 49 has been found by Schmidt among the Sponges dredged by Pourtales off Florida in 324 fathoms (‘Spong. Atlant.,’ p. 62); and in the “ Porcupine” dredgings in the North Atlantic it was procured from the still greater depth of 640 fathoms (Carter, 1. c.). Among the editor’s specimens from Shetland is one which is ten inches high, and a foot in diameter across the edge of the cup. Another very beautiful example is only three inches high, but expands very widely, and has a greatest diameter of thirteen inches, while its surface is proliferous with seven or eight young specimens springing from it. Genus 16.—Microctona, Bow., 1, 188; 1, 7. 1. Microctona FiotiTIA, Bow., u, 124; 1, 352; Pl. XXIII, figs. 1—6, and LXXXII, fig. 20. Habitat.— Westport Bay, Co. Mayo; colour when living yellow, very glairy with abundant sarcode (N.). One of the specimens from Westport Bay is a large mass, which measures in the dried state three and a half inches long, two and a half wide, and one and a half thick. It has numerous pieces of Corallina and Nullipora, as well as several small pebbles, em- bedded in its substance. It was dredged in about five fathoms. 2. Microciona Kenti, Bow., 1, 317; Pl. LXXXIX, figs. 9—13. In Vol. ITI, p. 311, fig. 9, for “represents the type VOL. IV. 4, 50 BRITISH SPONGIADA. specimen of the species in the cabinet of Mr. W. Saville Kent,’’ read— represents the largest of the specimens dredged by the Rev. A. M. Norman at Jersey.” On comparing the figure with the de- scription of the specimens, the student would be at a loss to reconcile the illustration with the account of Mr. Kent’s specimen; he will, however, find the description of the specimen from which the drawing was made on page 319. Dr. Bowerbank apparently chose this specimen for illustration as being the largest he had seen, and “in a much finer condition than the type one found by Mr. Kent.” 3. MicrocionA FRAUDATOR, Bow., wi, 275; Pl LXXXIITI, figs. 7—11. 4, Microctona tumutosa, Bow., nu. sp., Iv, Pl. XI, figs. 1—4. ‘Sponge massive, tumulous, tumuli conical, large, parietes thick; surface minutely rugose. Oscula within the cloacal tumuli. Pores inconspicuous. Dermal membrane abundantly spiculous; spicula ace- rate, same size and form as those of the skeleton, dis- persed. Skeleton-columns numerous, compact, long and slender, diffused ; spicula acerate, rather slender. Interstitial spicula few in number, same as those of the skeleton. “ Colowr.—In the dried state, externally dull grey, internally blood red. * Habitat.—Westport Bay, County Mayo, at extreme low-water spring tides; Rev. A. M. Norman. MIOROCIONA. 51 ** Hxamined.—In the dried state. “T received this sponge with many “others from my friend the Rev. A. M. Norman for examination. It consists of two little specimens, which have evidently been united by small adhesive points near their basal portions. When thus united the two would not have exceeded an inch in diameter, and the greatest height is about half an inch. One of these small masses is composed of four comparatively large conical tumuli, each terminating in a cloacal orifice, the margin of which is slightly thickened, and is quite smooth. The other specimen, rather the largest of the two, has one large tumulus and an immature one; the large one has three terminal orifices, and appears to have been two or more tumuli fused together by close contact. The largest of the tumuli rather exceeds half an inch in height. “The dermal membrane abounds with spicula, which are closely felted together without any approach to. definite arrangement. They vary to a small extent in size, but they are in every respect the same as those of which the skeleton-columns are composed. “‘ The skeleton exhibits the most strikingly distinctive characters of the species. The columns are long and slender; the spicula of which they are composed are compactly cemented together, and in the specimen in course of description they are of a deep blood-red colour. The columns are completely destitute of internal defensive spicula. When the columns, pass- ing from the basal portion of the sponge, reach the dermal membrane, they do not terminate there, but bending at an angle they continue their course in con- tact with the inner surface of the membrane for con- 52 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. siderable distances in various directions; and this peculiarity, combined with the slender, smooth, and blood-red colour, forms an important discriminative character of the species. The interstitial spicula are few in number and very irregularly dispersed, and they are of the same form and size as those of the other parts of the sponge. “Tt is remarkable that in this species of the genus there is only one form and size of spiculum which is common to all parts of the sponge.” 5. Microoiona tavis, Bow., u, 127; mi, Pl. XXIII, fig. 7—11. 1867 inch in length, and one of the shortest sort measured sty inchin length. The bihamate, retentive spicula are not so numerous as the bidentate, equi-anchorate ones ; they are small and of very slender structure, and are not especially characteristic. One of the largest measured 9 inch in length, and one of the smaller, 102 BRITISH SPONGIADE. which are the most numerous, measured yg/g5 inch in length. “The rete of the skeleton structure is tolerably symmetrical, and is generally composed of three or four spicula fasciculated together ; the spicula are short and stout; their spination is not very strongly pro- duced, and it is usually confined to the base and apex of the spiculum, but occasionally a few spines are developed between the two terminations. The inter- stitial membranes are very sparingly supplied with tension spicula, which are so slender as to readily escape observation, and a few retentive spicula, the same as those of the dermal membrane, are occasionally observed. “The great abundance of the hastate dermal spicula and their peculiar mode of disposition, combined with the singular forms of the tridentate, equi-anchorate, retentive ones, readily distinguish this species from several other closely allied British species.” 17. Haticuonpria conpEnsa, Bow., n. sp., 1v, Plate VI, figs. 1—8. “Sponge sessile, rising, and branching irregularly, compressed. Surface smoothand even. Oscula simple, marginal, tuberculate. Pores inconspicuous. Dermal membrane reticulated, rete monospiculous. Areas mostly triangular, rarely quadrangular, one spiculum in width; spicula acerate, short and stout, same as those of the skeleton. Skeleton very much condensed and complicated; rete multispiculous, loosely fascicu- HALICHONDRIA. 103 lated; spicula acerate, short and stout. Interstitial membranes aspiculous. “ Colour.—In the dried state, dull ochreous yellow. ** Habitat.—Isle of Man; Mr. D. Robertson. * Hxamined.—In the dried state. ** This sponge was presented to my friend the Rev. A. M. Norman by Mr. D. Robertson, and was sent to me for examination. It is an irregularly branching, com- pressed mass, four inches in height and about half an inch in width, the oscula on low tubercles being disposed on the margins of the mass. The dermal membrane, mounted in Canada balsam, and viewed with a power of 100 linear, is a very characteristic object ; the rete is monospiculous, and never appears to exceed the length of one spiculum wide, and the areas very rarely assume any other form than that of a triangle; occasionally a quadrangular one may be observed, but this is the exception and not the rule. The mode of the disposition of the triangular areas is very irregular, but very characteristic of the species. The peculiar structure of the skeleton is very remark- able. The rete is very close and complicated ; it is composed of numerous multispiculous fasciculi of short acerate spicula, so closely and densely packed together as to render the regular reticulated structure of the skeleton in some parts very indistinctly, and amid this mass interstitial cavities are irregularly distributed. ‘‘ The intermarginal cavities in this sponge are very distinctly and beautifully developed, and are very interesting objects in a slice of the sponge at right angles to the dermal surface when mounted in Canada balsam, with their beautiful canopy of reticulated dermal tissue. 104 BRITISH SPONGIADE. ‘The singularity of the skeleton-structures and the beautiful dermal rete of this species renders its dis- crimination by no means a difficult task.” 18. HaticHonpRIA CORALLOIDES, Bow., n. sp., Iv, Plate VII, figs. 1—3. “Sponge ramous dichotomously, surface slightly rugose. Oscula simple, dispersed. Pores inconspi- cuous. Dermal membrane abundantly spiculous, reti- culated ; rete more or less fasciculated, fasciculi irre- gularly disposed ; areas small, very irregular in form ; spicula acerate, long, more or less variable in dia- meter, same form and size as those of the skeleton. Skeleton—rete irregular, diffused; interstitial and intermarginal cavities very large ; spicula acerate, long and rather stout. “* Colour.—In the dried state, light fawn-yellow. ** Habitat.—Frith of Forth; Mr. D. Robertson. “« Haamined.—In the dried state. ““T received this sponge from my friend the Rev. A. M. Norman, to whom it was presented by Mr. D. Robertson. Its external appearance in the dried state is very like that of a small branching coral or a Gor- gona. 'The surfaces of the branches are all more or less rugose or papulous ; they are all cylindrical, gradu- ally attenuating to their distal terminations. There are a few comparatively large oscula rather exceeding a line in diameter, but by far the greater number of them are minute ; they are irregularly dispersed on all parts of the branches, and are rather numerous. The HALICHONDRIA. 105 dermal membrane is very characteristic of the species. It is thin and pellucid, and is furnished profusely with long, stout, acerate spicula, which are mostly collected into fasciculi containing from two or three to occa- sionally four or five spicula. These fasciculi are irregularly distributed, crossing each other in every direction, and thus producing numerous small irregu- larly shaped areas, none of which exceed the width of about one-third or one-fourth of the length of a spi- culum. This mode of dermal reticulation is very remarkable, and it is of rare occurrence among the Spongiade. The skeleton structure is very irregular, and without the slightest approach to definite arrange- ment, and the interstitial cavities usually exceed the length of a spiculum in diameter. The intermar- ginal cavities are also numerous and very large. “A fully developed skeleton-spiculum measured ¢g inch in length.” 19. Haticnoxpria THompsoni, -Bow., 11, 243; m1, Pl. XLIV, figs. 1—5. 1867 Dendoryx Thompsoni, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 535. 20 Hazicnonpria ForcEers, Bow., mu, 244; m1, Pl. XLILI, figs. 7—13. 1874 Halichondria forcipis, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, p. 17, pl. xiv, figs. 29—82, and pl. xv, figs. 37 a, b. 1876 Halichondria forcipis, var. bulbosa, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist, ser. 4, vol. xviii, p. 312, pl. xiii, fig. 19, and pl. xv, figs. 37 a, b. Habitat.—Dredged in the *‘ Porcupine’ Expedition. 106 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. (1869, station 54) between the North of Scotland and the Farée Islands, in 363 fathoms (fide Carter). Car- ter’s variety bulbosa was dredged (‘ Porcupine,” 1870, stations 24, 25) near Cape St. Vincent, on the Spanish Coast, in 292—874 fathoms. The form seems almost intermediate between H. forceps and Desmacidon anceps, Schmidt.* It agrees with the latter in having the legs of the forcepiform spicules short, strongly divergent and bulbous at their terminations, but in Desmacidon anceps only one of the ends is thus bulbous, while the anchorates are quite different, being equi- and not inequi-anchorates, and the other spicula also differ. I am inclined to think that the Spanish sponge differs specifically from H. forceps. Should this hereafter prove to be the case Mr. Carter’s varietal name can be most appropriately retained as the specific. 21. HaticHonpRIA siIMPLex, Bow., u, 246; 11, PI. XLVI, figs. 5—7. 22. HaticHonpria suBpoLA, Bow., u, 247; wi, PI. XLII, figs. 14—16. 23. HaticHonpRia FoLiata, Bow., 11,198; Pl. LX XIII, firs. 1—5. 1876 Halichondria foliata, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, p. 310, pl. xiii, fig. 10, and pl. xv, figs. 29 a, b. The ‘‘ Porcupine” specimen (1869, station 65) de- * ‘Die Zweite Deutsche Nordpolarfahrt,’ 1874, p. 480; ‘ Kiesel- spongien,’ Taf 1, figs. 1—9 (the species is called Desmacidon anceps in the text, but Hsperia anceps on the plate). HALICHONDRIA. 107 scribed and figured by Carter, is from a little north- west of Shetland, in 345 fathoms, and thus in deeper water though in the same region from which the type specimens were sent to Dr. Bowerbank. 24, HaticHonpria corrucata, Bow., u, 242; m1, Pl. XLITI, figs. 1—6. 1867 Biemma corrugata, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 539. Habitat.—Westport Bay, Mayo (N.). 25. HaticHonpria FALCULA, Bow., 11, 208, Pl. LXXIV, figs. 1—3. 1868 Halichondria falcula, Bowerbank. Last Report of Dredging among the Shetland Isles; Norman on Porifera, Brit. Assoc. Rep., p. 332. I have found a second and much finer specimen of this species in my collection. It is from the same locality as the type, which it closely resembles in every particular, but is of larger size, measuring two and a half inches long, one and three quarters wide, and nearly an inch and a half thick. 26. HALICHONDRIA FLABELLIFERA, Bow., un. sp.,1v, Pl. VII, figs. 4—10. *‘ Sponge massive, parasitical. Surface smooth, but minutely hispid externally. Defensive spicula very numerous, scarcely projecting through the dermis, fusiformi-acuate, basally and occasionally apically spinous; spines few in number, acutely conical. Dermal membrane pellucid, abundantly spiculous; 108 BRITISH SPONGIADA, tension spicula subfusiformi-cylindrical, long and slender, numerous, more or less fasciculated or dis- persed ; retentive spicula bihamate, simple and con- tort, numerous, variable in size; and bidentate equi- anchorate, and. rarely palmato-inequi-anchorate. Os- cula simple, dispersed. Pores inconspicuous. Skele- ton rete irregular; spicula fusiformi-acuate, stout and moderately long. Interstitial membranes spiculous, tension spicula rarely present; retentive spicula same as those of the dermal membrane, numerous. ** Colour.—In the dried state, dark brown. “* Habitat.—Westport Bay, Ireland, 5 fathoms; Rev. A. M. Norman. “ Heamined.—In the dried state. “I received a single specimen of this species from my friend the Rev. A. M. Norman for examination. It completely fills the interstices of a mass nearly two inches long by one in breadth of a specimen of Nulli- pora polymorpha, and in some parts growing over the apices of the branches and presenting a smooth sponge surface to the eye. The surface is very minutely hispid in the dried state, though both to the eye and to the touch it appears to be smooth, and it is only when a section of the sponge is made at right angles to the surface and mounted in Canada balsam that the nume- rous external defensive spicula become visible, and even in this state very few comparatively pass through the dermal membrane. ‘These spicula rarely exceed half the length of the skeleton ones, and they are much more slender; they are usually only basally spinous, but occasionally a few spines appear on various parts of the shaft or near the apex, but these are rarely so well developed as those of the base of the spiculum. HALICHONDRIA. 109 The dermal membrane is especially characteristic of the species. It is abundantly supplied with spicula ; the tension ones are subfusiformi-cylindrical, rather long and slender; on some parts of the membrane they are dispersed indiscriminately, but most frequently they are more or less gathered into broad, flat fasciculi, many of which radiate at one extremity in a fan- shaped manner. The retentive spicula are also very numerous. The simple and contort bihamates are small, and some of them very minute; they vary in length from 73g inch to g¢yo inch, while the length of the fully developed bidentate, anchorate spicula, average ggqy inch in length. This near approxima- tion of the fully developed anchorate and bihamate spicula in their length is very unusual, as it is most frequently the case that the latter form is at least twice as long as the former. The bidentate equian- chorate spicula are also numerous; comparatively speaking they are stout and well developed in their mature state, but in this specimen they may be seen in various early and progressive stages of development in the form of minute simple bihamate spicula, very different in their shapes from the real bihamate ones. The skeleton is very irregular in its structure, but decidedly reticulate. The rete is also more or less irregular ; in some parts it is multispiculous, while in others it is constructed of only two or three spicula. The spicula of which it is formed are very much larger than those of any other part of the sponge; they are decidedly fusiform, and occasionally subclavate at the base. The interstitial membranes are abundantly supplied with both forms of the retentive spicula, but the tension forms; so abundant on thedermal membrane, 110 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. are of very rare occurrence. A very few inequi-pal- mato-anchorate spicula were detected among the spicula separated by boiling in nitric acid, but I could not detect them in sitd ; they are remarkable in their form, though very minute, the palmate portion being quite half the length of the spiculum.” 27. HaLIcHONDRIA INCRUSTANS, Hsper, 11, 249; 111, 108, Pl. XLIV, figs. 7—12. 1867 Dendoryx incrustans, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 535. 1874 Halichondria incrustans, Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, pp. 2—4. Habitat.—Budleigh-Salterton, Carter. Birterbuy Bay, Galway; Jersey; Guernsey; Polperro, Corn- wall (N.). It is essentially a low-water-mark species, generally distributed round our coast. 28. HaLICHONDRIA OANDIDA, Bow., 1, 251; 1, Pl. XLIV, figs. 13—16. 1867 Biemma candida, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 539. 29, HALICHONDRIA IRREGULARIS, Bow., 11, 252; 11, Pl. XLIV, figs. 17—21. 1867 Dendoryx irregularis, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. 30. Haticnonpria Dickiz1, Bow., 1, 253; 11, Pl. XLV figs. 1—6. 1867 Dendoryx Dickiei, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. Habitat.—On Cellepora cervicornis, deep water, Shetland Seas, 1863; Polperro (N.). HALICHONDRIA. lil 31. Hattcnuonppia Parrersont, Bow., 1, 2553; m1, 115, 354, Pl. XLVI, figs. 1—6. 1867 Dendoryx Pattersoni, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. Habitat.—A single specimen dredged off Shetland. With reference to my Minch specimens which are figured in vol. iii, p. 115, it would be interesting to add that they were dredged by Dr. Jeffreys and myself at a spot off the mouth of Loch Ewe, in Ross-shire, where this sponge was living in company with some of the rarest animals in the British seas, including Poromya granulata, Holothuria intestinalis, and Ante- don celticus (N.). 32. HaLicHONDRIA PULCHELLA, Bow., m1, 256; wt, Pl. XLVI, figs. 16—19. 1867 Biemma pulchella, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 539. 32. Haticnonpr1a Incatu, Bow., u, 258; 1, Pl, XLVI, figs. 20—24. 1867 Menyllus Ingalli, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 533. 33. HALICHONDRIA SCANDENS, Bow., 11, 259; 11, Pl. XLV, figs. 14—20. 1867 Iophon scandens, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 534. 34, Haticnonpria Barter, Bow., 11, 261; m1, Pl. XLVI, figs. 25—29. 1867 Dendoryx Batei, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. 112 BRITISH SPONGIAD. 835. Hazicnonpria nicricans, Bow., u, 266; m1, Pl. XLV, figs. 25—81. 1867 Iophon nigricans, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 534. 36. HaLtcHonprIA ALBULA, Bow., 11, 268; 111, Pl. XLV, figs. 21—24. 1867 Dendoryx ulbula, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. 37. HaLIcHONDRIA EXPANSA, Bow., 111, 212, Pl. LX XIV, figs. 7—12. 1869 Halichondria eapansa, Bowerbank. Norman, Notes on a few Hebridean Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iii, p. 298. 38. HaLicHonpRIA VIRGEA, Bow., n. sp., iv, Pl. V, figs. 1—7. 1875 Halichondria virgea, Bowerbank. Report Dredging off the Durham and N. Yorkshire Coasts, Brit. Assoc. Rep., 1875 (1876), p. 198. “Sponge massive, sessile, more or less nodulous. Surface smooth. Oscula simple, dispersed. Pores in- conspicuous. Dermal membrane abundantly spiculous, tension spicula acuate, very long and slender, nume- rous, fasciculated; retentive spicula bidentate, equi- anchorate, large, few in number, and the same form, small and numerous. Skeleton—rete more or less regular, fibres rarely multispiculous, seldom more than trispiculous; areas large; spicula subfusiformi acuate, basally spinous. Interstitial membranes spiculous; spicula same as those of the dermis; tension spicula of rare occurrence; retentive spicula rather numerous. HALICHONDRIA. 113 ** Colour.—In the dried state, dark purple. “* Habitat.—Coast of Durham, 20 to 35 fathoms; Rev. A. M. Norman. ** Hxamined.—In the dried state. “‘T received four small specimens of this sponge from the Rey. A. M. Norman for examination. The largest was two inches in length, one inch broad, and not quite half an inch in thickness. The largest specimen was composed of four unequal-sized nodulous elevations, and there were indications of a similar character on the smaller ones. The dermal membrane affords the most efficient characters for the discrimination of the species, the tension spicula and their mode of distribution more especially so. In some few parts the slender, acuate spicula are somewhat irregularly dispersed, but by far the greater number of them are arranged in elongated fasciculi, which most frequently run parallel to each other, and from each of which the component spicula are frequently projected at slight angles from the central axis in an ascending direction. These bundles are in many parts so numerous and so close together as to almost appear as if the spicula were felted together. The retentive spicula are also very numerous, especially the smaller of the two descrip- tions of them. The larger forms are comparatively few in number, and are readily distinguished from the smaller series; they are all of the same size as nearly as possible. Several of them measured g}> inch in length, while the average size of the smaller ones was 7 Inch in length, and no gradational intermediate forms could be seen connecting the two groups. Both forms when in sit were attached to the surface of the membrane by the middle of their curved shafts, so that VOL. IV. 8 114 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. the anchorate terminations were both projected from the surface of the membrane. ‘‘ The skeleton rete is rather unequal in its structure ; it usually consists of two or three spicula in substance, but sometimes the number of spicula is more than can be distinctly determined; they are somewhat unequal in length, but in the adult forms they all agree in the slightly spinous character of their bases; occasionally, but rarely, a few spines may be detected near their apices, but this is rather the exception than the rule. The spination of these spicula requires a power of not less than 300 linear to render it distinct to the eye. The tension spicula are rarely to be seen on the inter- stitial membranes, but on many parts of them the anchorate retentive spicula are abundantly distributed. “The nearest ally among our British species of sponges to the one in course of description is Hali- chondria Dickiei, but they are readily discriminated by the difference in the forms of their retentive spicula, and also in their mode of distribution on the dermal membrane.” 39. HALICHONDRIA GRANULATA, Bow., 11, 262; 11, Pl. XLV, figs. 7—18. 1867 Dendoryx granulata, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 536. 40. HALICHONDRIA FARINARIA, Bow., 1, 269; 111, Pl. LXX, figs. 5—8. 41, Hationonpria InornatTa, Bow., u, 271; i, Pl. XLVII, figs. 1—4. 1867 Biemma inornata, Gray. Proc. Zool, Soc. p. 539. ISODIOTYA. 115. Genus 22.—Isopiotya, Bow., 1, 197; u, 9. 1. Isoprorya omREA (Grant), u, 274; m1, 121; Pl. XLVIII, figs. 1—5. Habitat.— Apparently universally distributed round our coasts. In addition to the many localities recorded in Volumes 1 and m1, I have found it at Guernsey ; Seaham Harbour, in the County of Durham; on Nulli- pora, Roundstone and Birterbuy Bays, Co. Galway ; and Westport Bay, Co. Mayo (N.). For “Chudleigh Salterton,” vol. ii, p. 275, line 4, read ‘‘ Budleigh-Salterton,” and p. 276, line 27, for ** Seahouse”’ read ‘‘ Seaham.” 2. IsopictyA PERMOLLIS, Bow., u, 278; i, 128; PI. XLVIII, figs. 9, 10. 3. Isoprorya MamMEatTA, Bow., 1, 306; 11, Pl. Ll, figs. 7—9. 4, Isopictya RamuscuLus, Bow., 1, 314; 11, Pl, LITI, figs. 1—3. Habitat.—Several small pieces, of which the largest is three quarters of an inch long, half an inch wide, and as much thick, and has five oscula surmounting nipple-like swellings, found between tide marks, Innis- gowla, Westport Bay, Co. Mayo. Colour when alive, pale violet. It is an erect growing species (N.). 116 BRITISH SPONGIADA. 5. IsopIcTyA FERULA, Bow.,n. sp.,1v, Pl. VIII, figs. 1—3. “Sponge battledore-shaped, coating, adhering throughout its whole length. Surface smooth. Oscula dispersed, simple, minute. Poresinconspicuous. Der- mal membrane pellucid, aspiculous. Skeleton having primary and secondary lines unispiculous; spicula acerate. Interstitial spaces one spiculum wide, very’ regular. Interstitial membrane aspiculous. ** Colowr.—In the dried state, dull ochreous yellow. * Habitat.—Birterbuy Bay, Ireland, 10 or 11 fathoms ; Rev. A. M. Norman. * Heamined.—In the dried state. ** Among the specimens of sponges dredged by the Rey. A. M. Norman off the western coast of Ireland, there was the gibbous half of a shell of Pecten maximus, thinly coated both within and without with Raphyrus Grifithsii, and on the surface of this species, on the inner surface of the shell, were several parasitical sponges, and among them two specimens of the species in course of description within an inch of each other, closely adhering for the whole of their length. They were partially embedded in a thin broad specimen of Isodictya Bowerbankt. ** The oval body of the largest specimen is six lines in length and three in breadth, and its greatest thickness does not exceed one line. The caudal appendage is seven lines in length and one in breadth, so that the total length slightly exceeds one inch. The smallest of the two specimens has the body rather more ob- tusely oval than the larger one, the length being four lines and the greatest breadth three lines. A portion of the caudal appendage has been lost, and half only of ISODICTYA. 117 its length remaining attached to the body of the sponge. In both specimens the caudal portion of the sponge maintains the same diameter for the whole of its length, so that the specimens closely resemble each other, each having the form of a rudely-shaped child’s battledore. : ** This remarkable form is not without a precedent, as it occurs in Polymastia radiosa represented in Plate XI, figs. 14 and 15, vol. ili, ‘Mon. Brit. Spongiada ;’ and, what is very remarkable, there is about the same amount of individual variation in the two specimens of each species of sponge, so that if the figures represent- ing P. radiosa were enlarged to the size of the two specimens of Isodictya ferula, they would form very good representations of the shapes of those of I. ferula, so as to be very apt to produce a belief in the mind of a hasty observer that the latter-named sponges were enlarged specimens of P. radiosa, or vice versd; but accurate examinations of the structural characters of the two species at once distinguishes them as not only separate species, but also as belonging to different genera; and in addition to the generic differences, the spicula of the skeleton of P. radiosa are acuate, while those of I. ferula are acerate. “The anatomical structures of I. ferula are exceed- ingly simple, but beautifully regular. The scalariform skeleton tissues are composed throughout the whole structure of a unispiculous network of acerate spicula, and it is only very rarely that two spicula occur toge- ther in any part of the primary lines of the skeleton. The secondary lines of the skeleton are each composed of a single spiculum, and they are disposed at such regular distances from each other as to cause the 118 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. skeleton tissues in a section of the sponge taken cor- rectly at right angles to its surface and mounted in Canada balsam to present the appearance of a beauti- fully regular unispiculous quadrangular network. **The dermal membrane is translucent, and in the areas of the terminations of the skeleton structures there were a few pores in an open condition. One form and size only of spicula occurs in this sponge, the purely acerate one.” 6. Isopiotya nosza, Bow., 1, 282; 1, Pl. XLIX, figs. 12—14. 7. Isoprorya prema, Bow., u, 313; 11, Pl. LVI, figs. 6—10. 1861 Haliclona pygmea, Bowerbank. List Brit. Marine Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. Habitat.—Sides of rock-pools between tide-marks to the south of Seaham Harbour, Co. Durham. The specimens in all respects closely agreeing with those which vccur at Scarborough. The species, as far as is yet known, is confined to the East Coast of England (N,). 8. Isoprorya ossourna, Bow., m1, 224 and 303, Pl. LXXVI, figs. 1, 2; Pl. LXXXVII, fig. 11. 9. Isopiorya InpEFINITA, Bow., 11, 286; m1, Pl. XLIX, figs. 15—17, ISODIOTYA. 119 10. Isopiotya inpistincTa, Bow., 11, 290; 11, 181 and 356, Pl. LI, figs 1—4, Habitat.—Dredged in about five fathoms near the mouth of Westport Bay. Among Dr. Bowerbank’s notes are the following on two of the examples pro- cured by me from this locality (N.). “ A fine mass of this sponge, about the size of half a large-sized orange, based on a rolled stone. In form and general surface characters it differs very consider- ably from either of the types figured in Plate LI, vol. ill, ‘Mon. Brit. Spongiade.’ The mass was soft and flesh-like and the oscula were large simple orifices. In the peculiarities of its dermal structures, and in all of its anatomical details, it is quite in accordance with those of the type-specimens, and, like them, it strongly illustrates the inutility of external characters as specific distinctions. Numerous specimens of Porcellana longi- corms were nestling within its large internal cavities. Another specimen in Mr. Norman’s collection from the same locality is an irregular mass of a very dark dull purple or brown colour, it was two and a half inches in length, one and three quarters inch in breadth and thickness. It is noteworthy as being the largest specimen of the species that I have yet seen.” 11. Isopictya stmptEx, Bow., 11, 294; m1, 107, 128, Pl. XLIV, fig 6, and Pl. L, fig. 18. 12. Isopicrya PociLtuM, Bow., 1, 805; 11, Pl. LIII, figs. 4—6,. 120 BRITISH SPONGIADE. 18. Isopictya LuTEosa, Bow., tr, 288; Pl. LXXXYV. figs. 5—7. 14. Isopictya anomaLa, Bow., 11, 293; 11, Pl. L, figs. 1—4. 1868 Ficulina anomala, Parfitt. Trans. Devon. Assoc. Sci. Liter. and Art, p. 13 (in separate copy). 15. Isoprorya PARASITICA, Bow., 11, 287; 11, Pl. XLIX, figs. 6—8. 16. Isoprctya Peacai, Bow., 1, 276; 11, Pl. XLVIII, figs. 6—8. Habitat.—Magnificently large examples dredged in company with the large specimens of Jsodictya in- distincta just described, Raphiodesma floreum, Ophli- taspongia seriata (unusually fine), Dysidea coriacea, and many other sponges a little inside the Lighthouse of Westport Bay, Co. Mayo. Among Dr. Bower- bank’s notes are the following on these specimens, which were submitted by the editor to him: “This sponge is very different in size and form from the type-specimen of the species, but it agrees so perfectly with it in its organic structures that it cannot possibly be referred to any other species of Isodictya, nor established as a distinct species. The Specimen sent to me for examination by the Rev. A. M. Norman was dredged at Westport Bay, Co. Mayo, Ireland, in from five to six fathoms. It was four and a quarter inches in length, two and a half ISODICTYA. 121 inches broad, and one and a half inch thick, with ten large, elevated, oscular orifices, the largest nearly a quarter of an inch in diameter. On the paper accom- panying the specimen the colour is stated to be ‘lilac,’ and Mr. Norman adds, ‘I have a specimen, not so fine as regards oscula, &c., but twice the size of this.” I am not surprised in so large a specimen at the congregation of the oscula in large cloacal organs. This frequently occurs in other largely-developed species of sponge, which in a younger state have the oscula simple and dispersed on the dermal surface. In Aalichondria panicea these differences are of fre- quent occurrence.” 17. Isopiotya vaARIANS, Bow., u, 281; 11, 807, Pl. XLVIII, figs. 14—16, Pl. LXXXVIIL. 1867 Philotia varians, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 522. 18. Isopictya ELEGANS, Bow., 1, 283; m1, Pl. XLIX, figs. 1—5. Habitat.—Under stones between tide-marks, West- port, Roundstone, and Birterbuy Bays; also dredged in these same bays growing on shells and Nullipora (N.). 19. Isopiotya FALLAX, Bow., 1, 302; 11, Pl. LI, figs. 10—18. 122 BRITISH SPONGIADA. 20. Isopictya MacAnprewi, Bow., 1, 284; mi, Pl. XLIX, figs. 9—11. Habitat.—Abundant on Pecten maximus, Lutraria, and other dead shells dredged in Birterbuy Bay; also in Roundstone Bay, and Westport, Co. Mayo (N.). « Among the numerous specimens of British sponges sent to me for examination by the Rey. A. M. Norman I found among those dredged in Westport and Round- stone Bays more than a dozen specimens of I. MacAn- drewt. The largest of them rather exceeded the size of the type-specimen described in vol. ii, p. 284, ‘Mon. Brit. Spongiade.’ Their external characters were also in accordance with those of the type- specimen. I did not detect gemmules in any of them, but their anatomical characters were identical with those of the described specimen. Along with them I also found a specimen of Isodictya fistulosa, which in some cases might be readily confounded with I. MacAndrewi. The size of the spicula and their mode of arrangement in the skeleton and dermal mem- brane very closely resembles those of I. MacAndrewi, but they are readily to be distinguished, by close observation, when sections of the two species are mounted in Canada balsam, by the aid of a power of about 200 linear, by the numerous external spicula projected from the dermal membrane of J. MacAndrewi, and the total absence of those organs on the dermis of I, fistulosa.” ISODIOTYA. 123 21. Isoprotya ristuLosa, Bow., u, 299; 1, 186, Pl. LIT], figs. 15—17. Habitat—A small sponge named by Bowerbank as belonging to this species is referred to in his note on Lsodictya MacAndrewi. It was procured by me in 1875 in Birterbuy Bay (N.). 22. Isopicrya DicHoToMA, Bow., u, 309; 11, Pl. LIII, fies. 12—14. 23. IsopioTya PERPLEXA, Bow., n. sp., Iv, Pl. IX, figs. 4—6. “Sponge massive, parasitical. Surface smooth and even. Oscula simple, dispersed. Pores incon- spicuous. Dermal membrane reticulate; rete irregular, rarely exceeding trispiculous, spicula variable in size, fusiformi-acerate, mostly large, same size as those of the skeleton; tension spicula acerate, long and slender, numerous, dispersed. Skeleton with primary lines bi- or trispiculous, irregularly disposed; secondary lines mostly unispiculous, abundant and very irregularly disposed; spicula fusiformi-acerate, large and long. Interstitial membranes abundantly spiculous; tension spicula acerate, long and slender, same as those of the dermis. “¢ Oolour.—In the dried state, dark brown with a tint of purple. * Habitat.—Westport Bay, Ireland, in 5—6 fathoms ; Rev. A. M. Norman. ** Hxeamined.—In the dried state. 124 BRITISH SPONGIADA. ** The colour and external appearance of this sponge, and the similarity of its location among the branches of Nullipora polymorpha, would readily lead a hasty observer to the conclusion that the type-specimen of Halichondria flabellifera and this one in course of description were the same species ; but a very slight microscopical examination quickly dissipates the illusion. But there is yet another difficulty to be surmounted before we arrive ata correct determination of the genus and species. The structural peculiarities of this sponge are so wide and diffuse, and the abund- ance throughout the whole of its structure of the long and slender tension spicula, as to very readily lead to the belief that the skeleton structure is that of a Hymeniacidon, and it is only by the careful examination of a correctly cut section at right angles to the dermal surface, and with a power of about 200 linear, that we become satisfied of its isodictyal structure. The specimens under consideration are immersed among the branches of Nullipora polymorpha, the largest being one and a quarter inch in length by three quarters of an inch in diameter, and in some parts it completely covers the distal terminations of the branches of the Nullipora. “The dermal characters in this species are remark- able, there not only being a well-developed rete, but in addition to that in many parts an abundant supply of long, slender, acerate tension spicula; so numerous in some cases as to nearly obscure the reticulate structure beneath them. ‘The dermal rete is very distinctly produced, but its mode of arrangement is very irregular, and the areas assume a great variety of forms, which are frequently * TSODICTYA. 125 still further complicated by the intermixture of the long and slender tension spicula. The same compli- cation of characters exists in the skeleton structures by the abundant presence of the long slender tension spicula on the interstitial membranes ; so that although but one form of spiculum, that of the fusiformi-acerate, stout and slender, prevails in this sponge, the pecu- larities of their intermixture render this species a specially perplexing one for specific determination.” 24. IsopiotyaA pENsA, Bow., 11, 292; ut, 355, Pl. L, figs. 5—7. 25. IsopictyA Grecori, Bow., mu, 301; m1, Pl. L, figs. 15—17. 26. IsopictyA PALLIDA, Bow., 11, 297; 11, Pl. L, figs. 8—10. Habitat.—Jersey. Tide-marks, Westport Bay (N.). 27. Isopictya simuLaNs (Johnston), 11, 808; 111, Pl. LI, figs. 5, 6. 1861 Haliclona simulans, Bow. List Brit. Marine Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1867 to zelop inch. The bidentate equi-anchorates are comparatively stout in their proportions, while the bihamates are remarkably slender. This equality in the length of the two forms is very unusual, the bihamate forms being most frequently twice the length of the anchorate ones. Both forms are sparingly dis- persed on the interstitial membranes, and the bidentate equi-anchorates especially so.” VOL. IV. 1] 162 BRITISH SPONGIADE. Genus 23.—Rapruiopesua, Bow., 11, 235. = Raphioderma, Bowerbank. Last Rep. Dredg. Shetland, Norman on Porifera, Brit. Assoc. Rep., 1868 (1869), p. 333. J. RaprniopEsma FLorEUM, Bow., 11, 190; in, 94, Pl. XXXVII, figs. 14—19. 1866 Hymeniacidon florewm, Bowerbank. 11, 190. 1867 Carmia florcum, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 537. 1870 Esperia florea, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 76. 1874 Raphiodesma floreum, Bowerbank. 111, 94, pl. xxxvii, figs. 14—19. Habitat.—On living shells of Pecten varius, covering thickly the valves, Laminarian zone, Westport Bay, Co. Mayo. The living sponge is of a purplish hue (N.). 2. RapHionrsma Lincua, Bow., 1, 187; 11, 237, 354, Pl XLVII, fig. 8, and LXVH, figs. 1—6. 1861 Halichondria lingua, Bowerbank. List Brit. Marine Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), 1861, p. 69. 1866 Hymeniacidon lingua, 11, 187. 1867 Myeale lingua, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 533. 1868 Raphioderma coacervata, Bowerbank. Last Report Dredging Shetland Isles, Norman on Porifera, Brit. Assoc. Report, p. 333. 1870 Esperia lingua, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant., p. 76. 1874 Raphiodesma lingua. 111, 237, 354, pl. xlvii, fig. 8, and Ixvii, figs. 1—6, This is the most massive and largest of British sponges. The specimen in my collection, described in vol. iii, p. 354, as eleven inches high, six inches and three quarters in breadth near the base, four inches near the middle, and one inch and a quarter in thick- ness, of tongue-like form, is evidently after all, large though it is, only a portion of the entire sponge. The RAPHIODESMA. 163 texture of this sponge is totally different from that of any other species with which I am acquainted. It has very much the appearance as though a mass of short pieces of tow had been subjected to great pressure so as to unite them together. It is only found in very deep water. In 1867 I dredged it in company with the type specimen of Isodictya laciniosa in 170 fathoms, twenty to twenty-five miles north by west of Burrafirth Lighthouse, Shetland. 3. RAPHIODESMA SIMPLICISsIMuM, Bow., 111, 824, Pl. XC, figs. 1—3. Habitat.—Filling up the interstices between the branches of Nullipora polymorpha dredged in shallow water, Westport Bay, Co. Mayo (N.). 4, RAPHIODESMA sORDIDUM, Bow., 111, 230, 3854, Pl. LXXVI, figs. 183—19. 5, RapHIoDESMA FALLACIOSUM, Bow., n. sp., Iv, Pl. XVII, figs. 7—12. ‘Sponge, coating irregularly. Surface rough and ragged. Oscula simple, dispersed. Pores incon- spicuous. Dermis abundantly spiculous; spicula acuate, rather long and slender, fasciculated ; fasciculi broad and flat, irregularly dispersed; bases and apices of the component spicula coincident. Retentive spicula dentato-palmate, inequi-anchorate, congregated in rosette-shaped groups, and bidentate inequi-anchorate, 164 BRITISH SPONGIADR. dispersed, also bihamate, simple or contort, large, few in number. Skeleton—fasciculi numerous, irregu- larly disposed ; spicula subfusiformi-acuate, short and stout. ** Colour.—Nut-brown in the dried state. “* Habitat.—Westport Bay, 6—7 fathoms, Ireland ; Rey. A. M. Norman. ** Heamined.—In the dried state. ** Among the specimens of British sponges dredged in Westport Bay by the Rev. A. M. Norman and sent to me for examination, there was a valve of Pecten varius, on which there were two patches of sponges ; one about an inch in length of Leuconia nivea, and on the opposite side of the valve an incrustation of a rough and rugged dark brown sponge an inch and a half in length and not quite a quarter of an inch in thickness, and this, on a careful microscopical examination, proved to be a new species of Raphio- desma, in many respects closely resembling in struc- ture R. lingua. The surface does not resemble that of R. lingua, and it has nothing of the tow-like appear- ance of that sponge; on the contrary, it is very rough and rugged in appearance and of a dark brown colour. In the forms of spicula of the dermis and the skeleton the two species correspond to a very considerable extent, and they also agree in their respective modes of disposition in all parts of the sponges, but they differ greatly in their proportions. Thus, although of nearly the same form, those of the skeleton of 2. lingua are #; inch in length and 7}; inch in diameter, while those of R. fallacioswm are only 9; inch in length and zsop inch in diameter; and the same inequality of size obtains in the retentive spicula of the rosette-like RAPHIODESMA. 165 groups of the dermis. Those of &. lingua measuring 333 inch in length, while those of the similar groups in R. fallacioswum were only stg inch in length. A striking differential character also exists in the biha- mate, retentive spicula of the two species. In R. lingua these organs are exceedingly numerous but very minute in the dermal membrane, while the same forms and size are entirely absent in the dermis of RB. fallacioswm, and in the latter species, in lieu of these minute biha- mate organs, there are a few comparatively large and strong bihamate spicula sparsely distributed on the membrane. The modes of structure and distribution of the dermal fasciculi are the same in both species, and the same observation holds good regarding the structure and congregation of the inequi-anchorate spicula of the rosette-like groups of the dermis; they are not composed exclusively of dentato-inequi-ancho- rate forms; a few of the bidentates are intermixed with them. The number of spicula in one of these groups is too numerous to be counted, and they are so small as to require a power of about 300 linear to render them distinct to the eye. With these closely resembling points of structure in the two species a close and critical examination and comparison of the two species is essentially necessary for a correct discri- mination of the two species, but the presence or absence of the numerous minute bihamate spicula of the dermis of R. lingua represented in Plate LXXVII, fig. 6, vol. iii of this work, will, when a portion of the dermal membrane of the specimen in course of examination is mounted in Canada balsam, usually lead the observer to acorrect conclusion. The differences n the general aspect of the two species may also assist in their dis- 166 BRITISH SPONGIADA. crimination, but these are characters upon which very little dependence can be placed.” 6. RAPHIODESMA INTERMEDIUM, Bow., n. sp., Iv, Pl. XVII, figs. 1—6. ‘Sponge incrusting roots of fuci, &c.; surface un- even but smooth. Osculasimple, minute. Pores incon- spicuous. Dermal membrane spiculo-reticulated, rete irregular, variable in the number of its spicula ; spicula acuate, rather long and stout, same as those of the skeleton ; retentive spicula bihamate, simple and contort, large and numerous, and bidentate inequi- anchorate, minute, and few in number. Skeleton —fasciculi numerous, irregularly disposed, variable in the number of their component spicula, bases and apices of their spicula coincident; spicula acuate, rather long and stout; tension spicula acuate, long, and slender; retentive spicula same as those of the dermis, but less numerous. *“ Colour.—Alive, scarlet; dried, light ochreous yellow. “* Habitat.—Roundstone Bay, Ireland, on roots of Laminaria ; Rev. A. M. Norman. “* Heamined.—From spirit. ‘“*T received from my friend the Rev. A. M. Norman two small portions of the root-like base of a Laminaria covered by a thin incrustation of sponge, the colour of which when alive is stated to have been ‘ scarlet,’ but when dried was of a light ochreous colour. I could not detect the oscula by the aid of a lens of two inches’ focus, though they became visible as small simple RAPALODESMA. 167 orifices in the portions of the sponge mounted in Canada balsam; nor could I under any circumstances detect the pores. When thus mounted for examina- tion the dermal membrane exhibited excellent specific characters. Its reticulated structure was exceedingly well developed. The rete is variable in the number of its component spicula and the areas very variable in form, no two of them appearing tobe of the same shape. There were no slender acuate tension spicula in the areas, but the bihamate, retentive spicula were rather abundantly but unequally dispersed, and occa- sionally, but rather rarely, the bidentate, inequi- anchorate, retentive spicula were apparent, but I did not observe in any case two of them together indi- cating a disposition to congregation into rosette- shaped groups. The component spicula of the rete are purely acuate, and are of the same size and form as those of the skeleton fasciculi. The arrangement of the skeleton fasciculi has rather a confused aspect, the bundles varying to a very considerable extent in the number of their component spicula, and crossing each other in every possible direction, and they also vary to some slight extent in length, but in all of them the bases and apices of their spicula are coincident. The confused appearance of the skeleton structure is increased to a considerable extent by the abundance of the long slender tension spicula which are dispersed in all parts of it. The retentive spicula are rather sparingly distributed amid the skeleton structures. «‘ There are only two species of British Raphiodesma that might possibly be confounded. with the one in course of description—JZ. simplicissimun and R. sor- didum. In the former species the spicula very closely 168 BRITISH SPONGIADA. resemble both in size and form those of BR. intermedium, but R. simplicissimum is entirely destitute of bihamate, retentive spicula, and in the dermis. the spicula are very numerous and are irregularly dispersed, and in no degree approaching reticulation. The loosely fasciculated dermal spicula and numerous rosette- shaped groups of retentive, mequi-anchorate spicula in the dermis of FR. sordidum readily separate it from R. intermedium. In truth the sponge in course of description is really an intermediate species between LR. simplicissimum and R. sordidum. “It is quite possible, though not very probable, from the rarity of the inequi-anchorate spicula in FR. inter- medium that hereafter a few rosette-shaped groups may be found in well-developed specimens of the species ; as we find in &. sordidwm they do not occur equally in all parts of the dermal membrane, and in some por- tions of it they are entirely absent.” Genus 24.—Sponertia, Linn., 1, 199; 1, 10. I. Sponaitra Fuuviatitis (Pallas), 11, 339; 1, Pl. IX, figs. 217, 218; Pl. XXII, figs. 517—519; mm, Pl. LIX. 1867 Ephydatia fluviatilis, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 550. 2. Sroncitta Parrirti, Carter, 11, 298, Pl. LXXXVI, figs. 5—12. 1868 Spongilla Mayeni, var. Pavfitti, Parfitt. Sponges of Devonshire, Trans, Devon. Assoc. Liter. Sci. and Art, p. 17 (separate copy). SPONGILLA. 169 On the 7th of February, 1874, I received by post from Dr. Battersby five small sponges which he had procured from the Lake of Killarney. Of these three were young Spongilla lacustris, and two were very small and young specimens of Spongilla Parfitti. The largest was a thin, nearly circular patch, not quite five lines in diameter. The smallest was a similar patch, but not more than two lines in diameter. In both the incipiently spinous skeleton spicula were abundantly present. This is the second habitat: known of this sponge, and from two out of the five specimens sent being of that species we may expect hereafter to find it not uncommon in the Lake of Killarney. “On the 30th of April, 1875, I received some frag- ments of Spongilla Parfitti from Dr. Battersby from Caragh Lake,* Ireland. Gemmules, or rather ovaria, in different states of development, were numerous in them.” 3. SPONGILLA SCEPTRIFERA, Bow. sll, 300, Pl. LXXXVI,, figs. 15—17. 4, SPONGILLA LacustTRIs (Don.), 1, 842; 1, Pl. IV, fig. 90; Pl. IX, fig..203; Pl. XXII, fig. 320; 11, Pl. LX. Habitat.—I found this sponge in 1875 in the neigh- * Lough Caragh, Co. Kerry, is famous in the eyes of naturalists as. the habitat of the remarkable slug Geomalacus maculatus, Allman, which lives rather high up upon the rocks of the mountain over- hanging the lake. Ihad the pleasure of procuring it there in 1870. It is not rare in this its only known locality (N.). 170 BRITISH SPONGIADE. bourhood of Roundstone, Connemara, in a small pool not far from Lough Cregduff, the locality of that highly interesting plant Naias flewilis (Rostk.) (N.). “In August, 1876, I received from my friend Dr. Battersby some specimens of Spongilla lacustris from Caragh Lake, which are remarkable on account of the extreme variety of form that they exhibit. One specimen was three inches in height, composed of seven slender branches of various length, none of them exceeding two lines in diameter. There were no indi- cations of ovaria, but in all anatomical details they perfectly accorded with the structures of more fully developed specimens. The difference in their general aspect is so great as compared with specimens from the Thames and other well-known localities that a hasty observer might readily be led to believe them to be a new species.” Suporper [V, 1, 200; 1, 10. Genus 25.—Desmacipon, Bow., 1, 200; 11, 10. 1. Drsmacipon rFruticosus (Montagu), u, 8345; 11, Pl. LXI. Habitat.—Fine masses dredged in Fermain Bay, Guernsey, in 1865 (N.). 2. Desmacipon Jurrreysil, Bow., u, 304, 347; m1, 157, Pl, LXII. 1866 Isodictya robusta, 11, 304. 1866 Desmacidon Jeffreysii, 11, 347 ; 111, 157, pl, lxii, DESMACIDON. L171 1867 Gellius robusta, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 538, 1867 Biemma Jeffreysii, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 539. 1868 Oceanapia Jefreysii, Norman. Last Report of Dredging among the Shetland Isles, Brit. Assoc. Rep., 1868 (1869), p. 334. It is beyond my comprehension how any one could place this species and D. fruticosus in the same genus ; now that the structure of Oceanapia Jeffreysii is known. Dr. Bowerbank, in referring to my description of Oceanapia, the genus I established, to receive this species, quotes a single sentence only of the generic character, and subsequently states (III, 161), that I “proposed to make it the type of a new genus under the designation of Oceanapia from the similarity in form of the bulbous mass of the sponge to a swede turnip,” and then goes on to argue against establishing genera on external form! In justice to myself, and for the information of the student, I think it well to quote here the following account of the sponge which I gave in the ‘ Brit. Assoc. Report,’ 1868; but leave it to others to adopt or reject my genus as seems best to them: * Genus.—Oceranapia,* Norman, n. g. “Sponge consisting of a hollow sphere filled with sarcode, surrounded by a hard spongeous crust of a very close and compact nature. From the opposite poles of the axis of the spherical or ovate body of the sponge there spring more or less numerous, simple, or branched fistule of great size and length; these fistule are also furnished at their base with prolon- gations which, passing inwards into the central cavity * Oceanus, and napus, a turnip. 172 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. of the sponge in the form of cylindrical branching tubes, are bathed in the great sarcodous mass. Skeleton spiculo-fibrous, irregularly reticulated ; fibres polyspiculous, the primary lines (especially of the fistulz) of great size. Spicula acerate, stout (Bower- bank, Vol. I, Pl. I, fig. 2), and very minute, in the form of half a ring, ‘simple bihamate’ (Bowerbank, Vol. I, Pl. V, fig. 109). Dermal membrane reticulate, rete for the most part unispiculous, spicula of the same two kinds as those of the skeleton. ** Oceanapia Jeffreysti (Bow.)==Desmacidon Jeffreysii, Bow., ‘Brit. Spongiadez,’ Vol. II, p. 347=Isodictya robusta, id., ib., p. 804. ‘In 1861 I dredged a portion of the spherical crust of the sponge, from which the fistulae had been abraded. This having been placed in Dr. Bower- bank’s hands, was considered by him to belong to the genus Isodictya, and is described in his work under the name J. robusta. In subsequent expeditions to Shetland I obtained many detached fistule, and also portions of the crust, which convinced me that the entire sponge, when found, would prove to be some- thing very different from what had been imagined by Dr. Bowerbank from the type specimen. In 1864 some of the fistule were forwarded by Mr. Peach to Dr. Bowerbank, who regarded them as a new species of Desmacidon (D. Jeffreysit). At length during the past summer several perfect specimens of the sponge have been dredged, and it is thus proved to be a remarkable species, perhaps the most interesting, as it is also one of the largest of British Porifera. *‘ In form and size the adult sponge most strikingly reminds us of a full-grown swede turnip. Imagine DESMACIDON. 173 such a turnip to be going to seed, and to have sent up several shoots. Now, break these:shoots off four or five inches from the bulb, strip off the leaves, as well as the fibrous portions of the roots, and scoop out all the interior of the turnip, leaving only the rind, and you will have a very fair idea of Oceanapia, The rind represents the spongeous crust; the hollow interior is a cup filled with sarcode; the broken-off stems are the cloacee, which are of about the size and shape of a finger, the smaller specimens having sometimes only one, but the larger as many as a dozen such cloacal fistule of various sizes, which are generally simple, but more rarely branched. The roots of the turnip represent other fistular appendages of smaller size than those which spring from the crown, and of more solid and stringy texture. These appear literally to take the place of roots, since in one instance they grasp a pebble with their extremities, and in other cases show evident signs of having been partially embedded among sand. My largest specimen con- tained nearly a pint of sarcode in the interior. This sarcode is of a deeper colour than is usual among the sponges, and when the dried Oceanapia is cut open the sarcode will be found lying on that side which has been downwards when drying, shrunk into a solid deep brown or almost black mass, having somewhat the appearance and consistency of cobbler’s wax.’’* 3. Drsmactpon Peacnu, Bow., 11, 349; 11, Pl. LXIII, figs. 1—7. 1867 Biemma Peachii, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 538. * Norman, ‘ Rep. Brit. Assoc.,’ 1868 (1869), pp. 334—335. 174 BRITISH SPONGIADR. 4, Dusmactpon consrricrus, Bow., mu, 350; m1, Pl. LXXI, figs. 3—10. 1867 Biemma constricta,Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 538, “* When I characterised this species it was from the only specimen that I had then seen of the sponge, a fragment about two inches high, based on the remains of a coral, and so completely waterworn that very few of its specific characters were available for description. Since the completion of Vol. III of my ‘ Monograph of British Sponges’ I received, August 20th, 1874, from the Rev. Mr. Norman a massive sponge of pale brown colour, which he had dredged in Westport Bay, County Mayo, Ireland. This, on a microscopical examination, proved to be Desmacidon constrictus in a fine state of preservation. The breadth of the specimen was three inches and a half, the thickness at the summit one inch and a quarter, and it tapered gradually downwards to the length of two inches and a quarter, terminating in a thin blunt basal edge about two inches wide. The form of this specimen is unlike that of the type, but the perfect state of preservation of all its structures enables me to give a more complete idea of its specific characters than that afforded by the first description. “The surface in the dried state is slightly rugose, and sections in Canada balsam beneath a power of eighty linear exhibit minute groups, each consisting of four or five spicula, projecting through the dermal membrane so as to cause it to appear minutely hispid. The dermal membrane is abundantly furnished with tension spicula, thickly felted on all parts of its surface; they are of the same shape and length as those of the skeleton fibres, but not above half their DESMACIDON. 175 diameter ; and the basal constriction, so characteristic of the skeleton spicula, is also present, but not so strikingly marked as in the larger ones of the skeleton fibres. The simple and contort bihamate retentive spicula are dispersed abundantly among the tension ones, and among them there are sparingly dispersed very minute inequi-bidentate anchorates, and a few inequi-dentato-palmates. The lengths of the latter two forms average the zygth inch, while the length of the bihamates varied from qggth inch to ggeth inch; and a very few minute and slender tricurvate, acerate tension spicula were dispersed among them. ** The oscula are small, simple, round or oval orifices dispersed on the surface of the sponge, and are not readily detected without the aid of a lens of two inches focus. “In a specimen of the dermal membrane mounted in Canada balsam a few pores in an open condition were seen. ‘*‘ The interstitial membranes were abundantly spicu- lous, but not to such an extent as the dermal, and the mode of disposition of the tension spicula was somewhat different, as in many parts they were more or less fasciculated, the fasciculi being disposed at about right angles to the longitudinal fibres, between which they were situated. These membranes were furnished with the same descriptions of retentive spicula as those of the dermal membrane. “‘ The additional information obtained from the ex- amination of the structures of the specimen described above, enables me to render the description of its specific characters much more complete, and I pro- 176 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. pose the following series of characters to replace those in Vol. II, p. 350, ‘Monograph of the British Spongiade.’ ** Sponge massive, sessile. Surface slightly uneven, minutely hispid. Oscula simple, dispersed. Pores dispersed. Dermal membrane abundantly spiculous ; tension spicula sub-fusiformi acuate, more or less constricted near the basal end, long and slender, very numerous, irregular, felted together; and tricurvate acerate, small and very slender, few in number; retentive spicula simple and contort bihamate, rather small, very numerous; and bidentate inequi-anchorate and dentato-palmato inequi-anchorate, very minute and few in number. Skeleton—rete open; fibre stout and compact; spicula subfusiformi-acuate, more or less constricted near the base, long and large. In- terstitial membranes abundantly spiculous; tension spicula same size and form as those of the dermal membrane, dispersed or subfasciculated; retentive spicula same as those of the dermis. ** Colowr.—In the live state pale brown. ‘* Habitat.—Shetland, Mr. C. W. Peach; Westport Bay, Co. Mayo, Rev. A. M. Norman. *“* Hzamined.—In the dried state.” 5. Drsmacrpon incoenitus, Bow., 111, 292, Pl. LXXXV, figs. 14—16. 6. DESMACIDON PANNoSUS, Bow., 111, 812, Pl. LXXXIX, figs. 1, 2. “‘When I described and figured this sponge it was DESMACIDON. 177 from a small specimen an inch in height and about three-fourths of an inch in breadth. Since then I have received a much better developed specimen for examination from my friend Mr. T. Higgin, of Huyton, near Liverpool, who obtained it at Guernsey. This specimen is irregularly ramified in nearly the same plane. It is four inches and a quarter in height from its present base, its natural attachment not being present. The basal portion of the stem does not exceed in height that of the type specimen; imme- diately above its base it divides into three branches, each of which is about the same diameter as at the basal portion; two of the branches are short, but the third is two inches and a half in height, and it terminates by dividing into several branchlets, thus attaining a total height of four inches and a quarter. All the larger branches are fistulous, the central cavities being large, and the parieties comparatively thin; and one short branch near the base has an open termination. “This specimen agrees very closely with the type in all its structural characters, but the more fully developed state of its growth requires an emendation of the specific characters derived from its external form, and I therefore propose the following to replace the one in Vol. IIT, p. 312: “Sponge. Branching irregularly; branches fistu- lous, parieties thin. Surface rough, ragged, and open. Oscula unknown. Pores dispersed. Dermal membrane rather sparingly spiculous; spicula acuate, slender, same length as those of the skeleton. Skeleton-rete very open, fibre compact but rather slender; spicula acuate, short and stout. Interstitial VOL. IV. 12 178 BRITISH SPONGIADA. membranes rather sparingly spiculous, spicula same as those of the dermal membrane. * Qolour.—In the dried state light brown. “‘ Habitat.—Jersey, Rev. A. M. Norman; Guernsey, T. Higgin, Esq. ** Hzamined.—In the dried state. “Mr. Higgin has informed me that he has deposited this interesting specimen in the Liverpool Museum, where it will be accessible to every student who may be desirous of seeing it.” 7. DESMACIDON copiosus, Bow., mI, 265, 357, PI. LXXXII, figs. 2—8. 1869 Desmacidon copiosus, Bow. In ‘Notes on afew Hebri- dean Sponges, &c.,’? Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, iii, p, 299. “‘ Among some fresh specimens of British sponges recently received from my friend, the Rev. A. M. Nor- man, were the two valves of a Pecten varius, one of which was entirely covered, and the other very nearly so, by this sponge, which did not exceed half an inch in thickness at any part of it. Under these circum- stances the external characters were very different from those of the two specimens previously described, their surfaces being smooth and even, but having the thin, white, leather-like aspect of the earlier speci- mens. Anatomically, the structures were in perfect accordance with the type specimen. This sponge was dredged by Mr. Norman in Roundstone Bay, Ireland.” DESMACIDON. 179 8. DESMACIDON CAVERNULA, Bow., 11, 268, Pl. LX XXII, figs. 9—12., 9. DesMactpon RoTaLis, Bow., 111, 327, Pl. XC, figs. 8—14. ‘“‘Mr. J. G. Waller found a specimen of this rare Species on a root of Laminaria at Anstey Cove, Torquay.” 10. Drsmacipon srminaris, Bow., 111, 319, Pl. LXXXIX, figs. 14—20. “‘T received a small specimen of this sponge from the Rey. A. M. Norman; it was not more than about half an inch in length, but the fragment was in a good state of preservation. It was labelled ‘ Scarlet, West- port, tidemark.’ A second specimen, also from West- port, but dredged in five fathoms, differs considerably from the type represented in Vol. III, Pl. LXXXIX, fig. 14, inasmuch as it is not parasitical. It is a rudely cup-shaped mass, two inches in height, with a very short pedicle, and is so unlike the forms of the specimens previously described as to be very likely to mislead the student who trusts in any degree to form as a discriminating character. It has been too well washed to retain all its specific anatomical characters as perfectly as those of the type specimen, but sufficient remain to place its identification beyond a doubt.” 180 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. 11. Desmactpun maacropaitus (Scouler, MS.), 11, 352, 1, Pl. XIII, fig. 264; 111, Pl. LXIII, figs. 8—14 ; Pl. UXXXIII, fig. 23. 1867 Mgagrophila varians, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 533. 1870 Esperia egagrophila, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant., p. 77 “* Among the sponges sent to me for examination by the Rev. A. M. Norman there was a specimen of Des- macidon cegagropilus labelled ‘ Tidemarks, Birterbuy Bay.’ It was of an irregular form, two and a half inches long by two inches at the greatest width, but it did not exceed half an inch at its greatest thickness. It was of a dull cream-yellow colour, and its upper surface was abundantly corrugated or minutely papil- lated, and the general aspect was that of a very characteristic specimen of the species. On taking sections at right angles to the surface from the thickest end of the sponge, and a portion from the dermal surface, and mounting them as usual in Canada balsam, and examining them with a power of 200 linear, they presented a most anomalous appearance. In addition to the usual strong spiculo-fibrous skeleton of the Desmacidon, there were several detached fasciculi of skeleton spicula, and a considerable number of rosette-shaped groups of inequi-palmato anchorate retentive spicula; and I at once saw that I had before me the elements of two very distinct genera of species, Desmacidon cegagropilus and Raphiodesma lingua inter- mixed and so incorporated as to completely simulate a. single individual of a most extraordinary structure. I carefully examined the sponge with a lens of two inches focus, but I could not discriminate the two discrepant tissues ; but on taking sections and a portion DESMACIDON. 181 of the dermis from the opposite end of the sponge and examining them, as I had the first specimens mounted, the mystery was at once solved; the characteristic tissues of Raphiodesma were entirely absent, and the sections under examination exhibited all the characters of a pure and simple specimen of Desmacidon egagro- pilus ; and I became assured that the intermixture of tissues was partial, and existed only at one portion of the specimen. A thin section from the basal portion of the sponge afforded precisely the same evidence as the sections last described. ‘“* The occurrence of the intermixture of these two species, from the close similarity of portions of the component parts of their respective bodies, is exceed- ingly interesting and instructive. The skeleton of the two species are both fusiformi-acuate, and the bihamate retentive spicula of each are exactly alike in form and in their abundance on the membranous tissues of each, so that it required no small share of experience of sponges to detect this remarkable mixture of structure. “The beautiful rosette-shaped groups of the charac- teristic spicula of Raphiodesma lingua afforded an excellent clue to the solution of the mystery, and the contrast between the structures of the dermal membranes was also very decisive ; while the dermal spicula of D. egagroptlus are slender and irregularly dispersed, those of BR. lingua are stout and fasciculated, forming an irregular network. I ultimately succeeded in detaching a very characteristic fragment from the surface with a few of the fasciculi of the skeleton of R. lingua beneath it, without any portion of the structures of the Desmacidon. From all these appearances it is evident that the Raphiodesma lingua was in a very 182 BRITISH SPONGIADA, early stage of its development, in truth, a mere pellicle of the structures. *« The occurrence of this singular mixture of species affords a valuable. lesson to students of the Spongiade, as the occurrence of one species in a very young con- dition in small patches upon, or nearly enveloping, another is by no means an unusual occurrence among both British and Foreign species. ** T received another specimen of Raphiodesma lingua, dredged at Westport Bay in four fathoms by the Rev. Mr. Norman, which varied greatly from the usual and normal form of the sponge so as to render it very difficult of recognition by its external characters. It completely coated the gibbous valve of a Pecten oper- cularis for about a quarter of.an inch in thickness, and the surface of the sponge was very much more rugged than is usual in this species.” 12. Dzsmacipon coLumetta, Bow., mm, 248, PI. LXXVIII, figs. 6—8. Genus 26.—Raruyrvs, Bow, 1, 201; u, 10. Rapuyrus Grirrirasi, Bow., 11, 854, 1, Pl. XIII, fig. 265; 11, Pl. LXIV. 1862 Papiilina suberea, Schmidt. Spong. Adriat., p. 69. 1868 Raphyrus Grifithsii, Parfitt. Sponges of Devonshire (Trans. Devon, Assoc. Lit, Soc. and Art), p. 9 (separate copy). 1870 Papillina suberea, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant., p. 77. Very fine masses of this interesting sponge are SPONGIONELLA. 183 abundant, covering, and often entirely concealing, dead shells of Pecten maximus in Birterbuy Bay, Ireland. The sponge when living is of a lemon-yellow colour. It has been recorded by Schmidt from the Mediter- ranean and from Florida. Susorper V, 1, 201; u, 11. Genus 27.—Drptopemia, Bow., 1, 201; u, 11. DIPLODEMIA VESICULA, 11, 857; 1, Pl. XIV, fig. 273; Pl. XXIII, fig. 324; Pl. XXXVI, fig.377; 11, Pl. LXX, figs. 12—14. Orper III, Keratosa, 1, 205; 1, 12. Suporper I, 1, 205; 1, 12. Genus 28.—Sponcionenia, Bow., 1, 206; m1, 12. SPONGIONELLA PULCHELLA (Sowerby), u, 359; 1, PI. XXXVII, fig. 8380; m1, Pl. LXV, figs. 5—8. 1861 Spongia pulchella, Bow. List. Brit. Mar. Invert. Fauna (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1862 Cacospongia sealaris, Schmidt. Spong. Adriat. Meeres, p. 27, pl. iii, fig. 4. 1870 Cacospongia pulchella, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb. p. 76. * Among the sponges I received for examination from the Rev. A. M. Norman, was a small specimen of 184 BRITISH SPONGIADS. S. pulchella, dredged off the Durham coast in thirty- five fathoms of water. It is nine lines in height, and closely resembles in form the specimen of the same species represented by figure 6, Pl. LXV, vol. III, ‘Mon. Brit. Spongiade,’ excepting only that it has the natural base, two lines in diameter, attached to a small fragment of a shell. This specimen is in a fine state of preservation, and is remarkable from its having an abundance of gemmules or ovaries attached to the inner surface of the dermal membrane, and to the fibres and membranes in the interior of the sponge. A few of these bodies are somewhat oval, but by far the greater number are spherical. As it is usually the case under such circumstances they vary greatly in their size. I measured several of them; the smallest was 7$oth inch in diameter and the largest 75th inch, and specimens of every gradation in size between the two extremes were very numerous ; and all of them were black and perfectly opaque; but in the remains of some of them that had apparently discharged their contents there were indications of their having contained numer- ous minute spherical molecules, such as we occasionally find in similar organs in other members of the Spon- giade. One of these in a fine state of preservation measured g7spth inch in diameter. These gemmules or ovaries were attached indifferently to the membranes or fibres of the interior of the sponge, and from the section mounted in Canada balsam they appeared to be very numerous, and to be distributed through all parts of the sponge. It is the only case in which I have observed the reproductive organs in the genus Spongionella, but in a specimen of a keratose sponge from Australia, described by me in the ‘ Annals and CHALINA. 185 Magazine of Natural History,’ vol. vii, 1841, pp. 129 —132, I have described very similar reproductive organs.” Susorper III, 1, 208; n, 18. Genus 29.—Cuatina, Grant, 1, 208; 1, 13. 1. Cuatina ocuzata (Pallas), 1, 861; 1, Pl. XIII, fig. 262; m1, Pl. LXVI. 1870 Chalinula oculata, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 2. Canina ceRvicornis (Pallas), u, 864; wt, PI. LXVII, figs. 1—3. 1870 Chalina cervicornis, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 3. Cuatina Montacut (Fleming), 11, 366; 1, Pl. XIII, fig. 263; 11, Pl. LXVIII, figs. 3—5. 1861 Haliclona Montagui, Bow. List. Brit. Marine Invert. (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1861 Haliclona Columba, Bow. L.c., p. 71. 1870 Chalina Montagui, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 4, Cuattna Freminei, Bow., u, 870; ut, 357, Pl. LXVIII, figs. 1 and 2. 1870 Siphonochalina (P) Flemingii, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 186 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. 5. CHALINA GRacILENTA, Bow., 1, 872; m1, Pl. LXVII, figs. 4—6. 1861 Haliclona gracilenta, Bow. List. Brit. Marine Invert. (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1870 Chalina (?) gracilenta, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. “T received the largest specimen that I have seen of this sponge, among others, from the Rev. A. M. Norman, who stated that he received it from Mr. D. Robertson, who found it under stones at Isle of Cum- brae. It was an inch and three quarters long, nearly an inch in width, and an eighth of an inch in thickness ; it had thirteen oscula at nearly equal distances from each other, and in its general aspect might have been very readily mistaken for a young specimen of Ophlita- spongia seriata when examined in the dried state.” 6, CHatina LimMBATA (Montagu), u, 373; m1, Pl. LXVII, figs. 7—13. 1861 Spongia limbata, Bow. List. Brit. Marine Invert. (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1870 Chalinula limbata, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 7. Cuatina Granti, Bow., u, 375; ui, Pl. LXVIII, figs. 6 and 7. 1870 Chalina Grantii, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 8. Onatina INoRNATA, Bow., 111, 277, 358, Pl. LX XXIII, figs. 12—16. OPHLITASPONGIA. 187 Genus 30.—Opuuirasponaia, Bow., 1, 14. 1. OPHLITASPONGIA PAPILLA, Bow., 11,378; m1, Pl. LXX, figs. 1—4, 1867 Ophistospongia papilla, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 515 (misprint). 1870 Clathria (P) papilla, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. “TI received a fine specimen of this rare species of sponge for examination from the Rev. A. M. Norman. It was found at tidemark, Westport Bay; it was two and a half inches long by one inch and a half wide, and had sixteen papille. The basal mass did not exceed a quarter of an inch in thickness, and it had evidently been adherent to a rock or slab of stone.” 2. OPHLITASPONGIA SERIATA (Grant), 11, 3876; 1, Pl. XVII, fig. 287 (as Chalina seriata); 111, 167, Pl. LXV, figs. 1—4 (as Ophlitaspongia seriata). 1861 Haliclona seriata, Bow. List. Brit. Marine Invert. (Brit. Assoc.), p. 71. 1867 Seriatula seriata, Gray. Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 515. This sponge is found in abundance coating shells, especially those of Pecten varius, while still alive in a few fathoms of water just inside the lighthouse at the entrance of Westport Bay, Co. Mayo. The sponge grows much more luxuriantly in this locality than I have met with it elsewhere, being thicker and more mas- sive, and the oscula of much larger size than usual. On two young sponges from this same locality, Dr. Bowerbank has left the following note :—‘* Among the specimens sent to me for examination by the Rev. A. 188 BRITISH SPONGIADZ. M. Norman, were two small specimens of Pecten varius. One valve of each being nearly covered by a layer of sponge not exceeding half a line in thickness. On mounting a small portion of each in Canada balsam, I found them to be very young specimens of 0. seriata, but in only a partially developed condition. The usual oscula were not apparent, and the defensive spicula based on the skeleton fibres were few in number and slender in their proportions. All the spicula charac- teristic of the species were present, but only sparingly 80. ** These specimens are very instructive, as without a careful microscopical examination their species certainly never would have been suspected.” Suporper IV, 1, 209; 11, 15. ‘Genus 31.—VeEronciIA, Bow., 1, 209; 11, 15. Veroneia ZETLANDICA, Bow., 1, 380; 11, 177, Pl. LXX, figs. 9—14. 1870 Cacospongia Zetlandica, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. Susorper VII, 1, 211; 1m, 16. Genus, 82.—DysipEa, Johnston, 11, 16. 1. Dystpza Frraciuis (Montagu), 1, 881; 1, Pl. XIV, figs. 270—272; 11, Pl. LXIX. 1870 Spongelia fragilis, Schmidt. Spong. Atlant. Geb., p. 77. 1876 Dysidea fragilis (in 312 fathoms), Carter. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, p. 232. DYSIDEBA. . 189 “ Dysidea fragilis. I received a specimen of this sponge from the Rev. A. M. Norman, presenting a very unusual aspect. It was a very thin stratum of irregu- larly reticulated tissue, which, from the small shells and other extraneous bodies adherent to the lower surface, had evidently occupied a recumbent surface. Its internal structure was also very singular. A few of the larger fibres were well filled with sand, while by far the greater number were entirely destitute of that. material. A similar paucity of sand may be frequently observed in specimens from Brighton.” Mr. Hyatt, in his ‘ Revision of the North American Porifere,” pt. ii, 1877, has recorded what he believes to be this Sponge from Zanzibar and also from Biscayne Bay, Florida; but his description and photographic figures are not sufficient to enable us to determine with certainty whether his Dysidea fragilis is really our species or not; fig 17 does not so much remind us of the facies of British specimens as does the washed example represented in his fig. 18. Marshall* has published a valuable paper on the Sponges belonging to this family, but the British species had not fallen under his observation. This paper must, however, necessarily be referred to by any one studying this genus. 2. Dysrpra cortacea, Bow., 111, 8341, Pl. XCI, fig. 20. ‘A specimen was dredged by the Rev. A. M. Nor- man in from five to six fathoms in Westport Bay, Co. Mayo, Ireland. The sponge is two inches and a half * “Untersuchungen iiber Dysideiden und Phoriospongien,” ‘ Zeit. Wiss. Zool.,’ xxxv, 1880, p. 88. 190 BRITISH SPONGIADA. in height, the same in breadth, and one inch and a half in greatest thickness. It is thin at the base and in- creases in thickness upwards. Numerous oscula occur at and near the distal termination of the sponge, they exceed twenty in number. The greater number were funnel-shaped orifices, the bottom of some being open while others were closed bya membrane. The general surface characters of the coriaceous texture were in perfect accordance with those of the type specimen.” CATALOGUE OF WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Dr. Bowersank’s volumes contain scarcely any references to the writings of others. It has appeared to the Editor, therefore, very desirable to furnish the student with a list of the works and papers which have been written on the subject. He has therefore drawn up with great care the catalogue which follows. It will be found, he trusts, tolerably complete. If, however, omissions—and there must necessarily be such—are found he would plead as extenuating cir- cumstances: first, that it is the first catalogue of the kind which has been attempted; secondly, that it has been prepared in the country, where he has had to depend almost entirely on his own private library. No doubt there are many other papers scattered among the very numerous natural-history periodicals of Europe and America, and also among the Transac- tions of their scientific societies, which have escaped his notice. He has purposely only referred to a few out of the many general text-books on Zoology in which reference to the structure and organisation of the 192 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Sponges may befound. The earliest writers quoted are those upon whose figures and description Linnean and Lamarckian species have been founded, and whose writings, therefore, may be considered as entering into the scientific bibliography of the class. Works and papers on fossil sponges are excluded, except in a few cases where they contain references to arrangement and recent species. The names of authors are arranged chronologically, but when an author’s name is once introduced all that he is known to have subsequently written is given after the name. REFERENCE LIST TO AUTHORS IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGUE. PAGE Austin . 4 . . 203) Eckhel Balfour . . - 223) Ehlers . Balsamo- Crivelli . . 210 | Ehrenberg Barrois . : i . 219) Eimer . Bell F F F . 199) Ellis Bellamy . ‘ : . 201 | Ellis and Solander Beltremieux 2 ‘ . 211 | Esper Beneaume 5 . . 195 | Fabricius Bertoloni ‘ ‘ - 223 | Fischer . . Bianconi . : Fi . 201 | Fleming (J.) Blainville z : - 200] Fleming (W.) Bocage . . ‘ . 212 | Forel Bose : ey ok . 199] Fullager . : Bowerbank , 2 . 20L) Funck . A Brandt . 3 F . 209] Ganin Brotherus ; é . 222 | Gervais 4 Carter. i i . 204] Gosse . . Cavolini . 4 r . 196] Grant. Chiaje . & ‘ . 199 | Gray (J. E.) F Chimmo . : : . 2231 Gray (S. F.) : Clark =. 5 ; . 211] Greene Claus F 2 . . 212) Grimm . Costa : . . 208 | Grube Coues and mantow : - 221 | Gunnerus Couch . ‘ 4 . 203 | Hadlow . Czerniavsky . . . 221 | Hackel . Z Dawson . “ : . 222 | Hancock . 5 Desor . : é . 208 | Hardwicke Deszo_ : : . 222 | Harting . F Dobie . . A . 208 | Herklots and Marshall Donati. . : . 195 | Higgin Duchaissaing . . 211 | Hogg Duchaissiang and Michilotti . 211 | Huxley . . Dujardin - . . 201 | Hyatt . Duncan . ‘ ‘ . 222 | Imperato Dutrochet : ‘ . 200 | Jameson ; Duvernoy ‘ : . 201 | Johnston é Dybowski a‘ é . 220 | Keller . - VOL. IV. 13 PAGE . 216 . 216 . 203 - 216 . 195 - 196 196 196 213 199 - 216 - 218 219 . 216 - 221 - 200 208 199 197 197 . 223 . 219 . 216 . 196 . 217 . 211 - 208 - 199 - 211 213 217 - 201 « 208 . 220 - 195 - 196 + 200 . 217 194 - Kent 7 Koerte . Kélliker . Kruckenberg Lamarck . Lamouroux Lankester Laurent . Lecoq . Leidy . Lereboullet Lichtenstein Lieberkiihn Linneus . Lorenz Lovén . Ludvig . Liitken . McIntosh Marenzuller Marshall . Marsilli (de) Martens . Mayen Mayer . Metschnikoff Mereschkowsky Michelin . Micklucho-Maclay Milne Edwards Mobius . Montagu Moore , Moulins . Miller Murie . Nardo . Norman . Nozeman Olivi r Owen . Pagenstevher Pallas. Parfitt . Payer . . BRITISH SPONGIADA. PAGE - 214 + 208 . 210 . 222 . 196 . 197 . 217 - 200 . 209 . 208 . 201 . 196 - 209 . 195 « 210 » 213 . 197 + 218 . 217 « 222 - 218 . 195 » 218 - 201 « 208 . 217 . 221 - 208 . 213 « 228 . 216 - 196 « 214 « 216 - 196 « 220 « 200 . 214 + 223 . 196 « 203 + 216 - 195 . 212 . 219 Plancus . . Pontoppidan . Potts F " Quoy and Gaimar Raspail . . Ridley . . Risso . é Rumph . . Sars ‘ . Savigny Schuffner Schmidt . 4 Schultze . Schulze . e Schuffner Schweigger Scréter . . Seba . F Selenka . Fi Semper . . Sloane ‘ Smith and Harger Sollas . , Sorby Sowerby . . Steward (C.),1 . Steward (C.),2 . Strange . ‘ Strickland . Stutchbury Thomson é Thompson . Tilesius . A Turgot . . Turpin . Turton . ‘ Vahl . a Vaillant . 3 Valenciennes . Verrill . : Vosmaer . ‘ Waller. ° Wright Zittel =. ; CATALOGUE. Imperato (F.). Dell’ Historia Naturale, fol., Napoli, 1599. Rumpx (G. E.). D’Amboinsche Rariteitkamer, fol., Amsterdam, 1705. Stoane (H.). Voyage and Natural History of Jamaica, 2 vols., fol., London, 1707. BENEAUME (—). Spongia fluviatilis, fragilis et piscem olens, Mém. Acad. Se. Paris, 1714, p. 231. Manrsritt (Comte de). Histoire Physique de la Mer., fol., Amsterdam, 1725. Szpa (A.). Locupletissimi rerum naturalium thesauri accurata descriptio, 4 vols., fol., Amsterdam, 1734-65. Puancus (J.). Ariminensis, de Conchis minus notis liber, 4to., Venetiis, 1739. Dowatr (V.). Della Storia Naturale Marina dell’ Adriatico, Venezia, 1750. Ponropripan (E.). Natural History of Norway, fol., London, 1755. Exxis (John). Essay towards a Natural History of the Corallines and other marine productions of a like kind commonly found on the coasts of Great Britain and Ireland, 1755, p. 78. On the nature and formation of Sponges, Phil. Trans., vol. 55, 1765, p. 280. Toreot (HK. F.). Mémoire instructif, * * diverses curiosités d’Histoire Naturelle, 8vo., Paris et Lyons, 1758. Patias (P.8.). Elenchus Zoophytorum, 1766, p. 375. Reise durch verschiedene - Provinzen des Russichen Reichs, Theil III, 1776, pp. 100, 101, and (Anhang) p. 710, No. 58 (Spongia Baicalensis). —— Characteristik der Thierpflanzen, 1787, p. 221 (Spongia fluvia- tilis), and pp. 235, 236 (Sp. Baicalensis). Linnzus. Systema Natura, edit. xii, 1767. 196 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Srranee (John). An Account of some very perfect and un- common specimens of Spongie from the Coast of Italy, Philos. Trans., vol. 1x, 1770, p. 179. Gounvervs (J. E.). Von verschiedenen Seeschwimmen, Drontheim Gesellsch. Sshrift, vol. 4, 1776, p. 65. Mizzrr (0. F.). Zoologie Danice prodromus, Hafniez, 1776. —— Zoologica Danica, 4 vols., fol., 1777—1806, Fazricivs (0.). Fauna Greenlandie, 1780. Cavourni (F.). Memorie per servire alla storia de Polipi Marini, 4to., Napoli, 1785. Exzis and Sonayper. Natural History of many curious and uncommon Zoophytes, collected from various parts of the Globe, 4to., 1786. : Esrrr (E. J. C.). Die Pflanzenthiere, Niirenburg, 4to., 3 vols., 1788—18380. Scuroérer (J. §.). Beschreibung einer neuen Spongie des siissen Wassers, Spongia canaliwm, Der Naturforscher, St. 23, 1788, p- 149. Oxrvi (G.). Zoologia Adriatica, 4to., Bassano, 1792. Vaut (Mart.). Beskrivelse af en ny Sde-svamp., Skrivten Natur- hist. Selsk., Bd. 2, Heft 2, 1793, p. 51. LicHTEnsTEIn. Ueber die Badeschwamme, Lichtenberg, Voigt’s Magaz., ii, St. 2, 1796, pp. 17—19. Turton (W.). Translation of Linneus’s General System of Nature, amended and enlarged, 1800-6, 7 vols. Tiztesius (W. G.). Zwei verschiedene Species (Spongia villosa and ocellata) in einem Riihrenschwamme vereinigt, Voigt’s Magaz., Ba. vi, 1808, pp. 277—288. Sowerby (J.). British Miscellany, 1804-6 (Pl. LX, Spongia cancellata ; Pl. XLII, Spongia pulchelia). Jameson (R.). Catalogue of Animals, of the Class Vermes, found in the Frith of Forth (Cat. including 7 Sponges), Wernerian Memoirs, vol. i, 1811, p. 561. Monraavu (George). An Essay on Sponges, with descriptions of all the species that have been discovered on the coast of Great Britain, Wernerian Memoirs, vol. ii, p. 67, 1818 (paper read 1812). Lamanox (J. B. P. A.). Sur les Polypiers empatés Eponges, Ann. du Muséum, tom. xx, 1818, pp. 294—312, 870—880, and 482 —458; Mém. du Muséum, tom. i, 1825, pp. 69, 162 and 331. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 197 Lamarox (J.B. P.A.). Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Ver- tébres, 1816, —— deuxitme edition, 1835. Lamovrovux (J. V. F.). Histoire des Polypiers Coralligénes flexibles, vulgairement nommés Zoophytes, 1816, Caen, or (translated) Corallina, 1824, London. —— Exposition méthodique des genres de l’ordre des Polypiers, avec les descriptions de celles des principales espéces, 1821, Paris. ; Stewart (Charles). Elements of the Natural History of the Animal Kingdom, 1817, Edinburgh. Lupvie (C. H. P.) and Une (A. F.). Diss. pharmacol.-med. de Spongia marina, Lipsie, 4to, 1819. Scuwetagzr (A. F.). Beobachtungen auf Naturhistorischen Reisen, 1819. —— Handbuch der Naturgeschichte der Skeletoser ungegliederten Thiere, &c., 1820. Gray (8S. F.). Natural arrangement of British Plants, 1821. Gray (J. E.). The situation and rank of Sponges in the scale of Nature, and on their internal structure, Zoological Journal, vol. i, 1825, pp. 46—52. — On the chemical composition of Sponges, Annals of Philo- sophy, new ser., vol. ix, 1825, p. 431, 432. British Museum Catalogues, List of British Sponges, 1848. —— On the Genus Hyalonema, Ann. Nat. Hist., vi, 1850, pp. 306, 307. —— On Aphrocallistes, a new genus of Spongiade from Malacca, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. xxvi, 1858, pp. 114, 115; and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. ii, 1858, p. 224. — Description of Aphroceras, a new genus of Calcareous Spongiade from Hong Kong, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, xxvi, 1858, p. 113; and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. ii, 1858, p. 83. —— Description of a new genus of Sponge Xenospongia, from Torres Straits, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. xxvi, 1858, pp. 229, 230; and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. ii, 1858, p. 369. —— Description of MacAndrewia and Myliusia, two new forms of Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. v, 1860, p. 495; Zool. Soe. Proc., vol. xxvii, 1859, pp. 357—361. —— Notes on the ‘ Glass Rope,’ Hyalonema Sieboldiz, Aun. Nat. Hist., vol. xviii, 1866, pp. 287 and 485; Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond, 198 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 1867, p. 117; Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. i, 1868, p. 292; vol. ii, 1868, p. 264; vol. iii, 1869, p. 192. ‘ Gray (J. E.). On Venus’ Flower-Basket (Euplectella speciosa), Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. xviii, 1866, p. 487. ——-On Placospongia, a new generic form of Spongiade in the British Museum, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 127. —— Notes on the arrangement of Sponges with the description of some new Genera, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 492. —— Observations on Sponges and on their arrangement and nomenclature, Ann. Nat. Hist., 1868, vol. i, p. 161. —— Letter from, containing a reply to Dr. Bowerbank’s remarks on his ‘Notes on Sponges,’ Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1868, p. 532, Notes on Theonilla, a new genus of Coralloid Sponges from Formosa, Proe. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1868, p. 565. —— Notes on Ceratellide, a family of Keratose Sponges, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1868, p. 575. — Notes on Xylospongia Cookii, a new genus of Palmated Sponges in the Collection of the British Museum, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1868, p. 637. —- On Aleyonellum, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. ii, 1868, p. 890. — Note on Hyalonema boreale, Lovén, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. i, 1868, p. 484. —— Note on Hyalonema Schultzei, Semper, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. ii, 1868, p. 373. — On Tetilla euplocamus and Hyalonema boreale, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. ii, 1868, p. 319. —— Note on Janthella, a new genus of Keratose Sponges, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1869, p. 49. —— Note ona new genus of Sponge from West Australia, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, 1870, pp. 272 and 346. Notes on Anchoring Sponges (in a letter to Mr. Moore), Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, 1870, p. 309. Notes on the classification of Sponges, Ann. Nat, Hist., ser. 4, vol. ix, 1872, p. 442. —— On a new netted Sponge (Meyerella) from the Philippines, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 76. ~—— New genus of Hexradiate and other Sponges discovered in the Philippine Islands, by Dr. A. B. Meyer, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 184, WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 199 Gray (J. E.). On the Animal of the Glass Rope; on the name Tethya and its varieties of spelling; Marine Sponges in the British Museum, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 152. —— Notes on the siliceous spicules of Sponges, and on their division into types, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xii, 1878, p. 203. -—— On two new Free Sponges from Singapore, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xi, 1873, p. 234. —— On the arrangement of Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, 1874, p. 284. Harpwicxe (T.). Description of a Zoophyte, commonly found about the coasts of Singapore (Spongia patera), Asiat. Research, xi, 1822, pp. 180, 181. Cutasz (S. delle). Memorie sulla storia e anatomia degli animali senza vertebre del regno di Napoli, 1823-9, Napoli. Bett (Thomas), Remarks on the animal nature of Sponges, Zoological Journal, vol. i, 1824, p. 202. Grant (R. E.). Observations and experiments on the structure and functions of the Sponge, Edinburgh Phil. Journ., vol. xiii, 1825, pp. 94-107, 343—346; vol. xiv, 1826, pp. 118—124, 336—341. —v-- Remarks on the structure of some Calcareous Sponges, Edinb. New Phil. Jour., vol. i, 1826, pp. 166—171. —— Observations on the structure of some Siliceous Sponges, Edinb. New Phil. Jour., vol. i, 1826, pp. 341—351; and vol. ii, pp. 121—141. Notice of a New Zoophyte (Cliona celata) from the Firth of Forth, Edinb. New Phil. Jour., vol. i, 1826, p. 78. —— Structure and Nature of Spongilla friabilis, Edinb. Phil. Jour., vol. xiv, 1826, pp. 270—284. Notice of two new species of British Sponges (Spongia sanguinea and S. cinerea), Edinb. New Phil. Jour., vol. ii, 1827, p. 203. Risso (A.). Histoire Naturelle des principales productions de lEurope Meridionale, vol. 5, 1827, Paris. Bosc (L. A. G.). Histoire Naturelle des Vers, 2nd edit., 1827, Paris. Fremine (J.). History of British Animals, Edinburgh, 1828. Raspait (Fr. V.). Anatomie Microscopique des Spongilles, Mem. Soc. d’Hist. Nat. de Paris, iv, 1828, pp. 204—237 and 246, pl. xxi; Féruss. Bull., xiii, 1828, p. 170. 200 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Dourrocuet. Observations sur la Spongilla ramosa, Lam. (Ephi- datia lacustris, Lamoux), Ann. Sci. Nat., tom. xv, 1828, pp. 205—218. Narvo (G. D.). Auszug aus einem neuen System der Spongia- rien, Isis, 1833, p. 517. — De Spongiis, Isis, 1831, p. 714. —— Ueber die Spongien und nachst verwandten Thiergattungen, Oken, Isis, 1833, col. 519—524. —— Ueber die Spongien und Asterien Oken, Isis, 1834, 714—717. —— Sopra un nuovo genere di Spugne, le quali perforano le pietre ed i gusci marini, Ann. Sci. Lomb., Veneto, ix, 1839, pp. 221— 226, ——- Sopra un nuovo genere di Spongiali Silicei intitolato Vioa, Venezia, 1840. Quoy and GarmaRp. Voyage d’Astrolobe, Paris, 1833 [contains description and figure of Alcyoncellum speciosum, p. 802, pl. xxvi]. Buarnvitte (M. D. de). Manuel d’Actinologie et de Zoophyto- logie, 1884-7, Paris. Jounston (G.). On Spongia suberea, Loudon’s Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vii, 1834, pp. 490—492. —— List of five sponges found on North Durham Coast, Trans. Newe. Soe., vol. ii, 1838, p. 269. —— History of British Sponges and Lithophytes, London, 1842. —— Description of anew British Sponge (Halichondria macularis), Ann. Nat. Hist., xviii, 1846, p. 475 ; Berwick Nat. Hist. Club, Trans. ii, 1849, p. 196. Gervais (P.). Surles Eponges d’eau douce, Compt. rend. Acad. Sc. Paris, tom. i, 1835, pp. 260—262. —— Neue Untersuchungen iiber die Spongillen, Fror. Not. Bd. 47, No. 1016, 1836, pp. 55, 56. Turpin. Rapport sur une note de M. Fél. Dujardin relative a Vanimalité des Spongilles, Compt. rend. Acad. Sc. Paris, tom. vii, 1888, p. 556. Lavrent (J. L. Maur). Recherches sur la Spongille fluviatile, Compt. rend. Acad. Sc. Paris, tom. vii, 1888, p. 617—619; tom. xi, 1840, pp. 478, 479, 6983-—696, and 1048—1051. —— Nature de la Spongilla fluviatilis, sur les corps reproducteurs de la Spongille, Paris, Soc. Philom. Proc. Verb., 1840, pp. 69 —71—74. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 201 Laurent (J. L. Maur). Sur les embryons ciliis et libres des Spongilles, Paris, Soc. Philom. Proc. Verb., 1841, pp. 73, 74. Zoophytologie (de ‘‘ Voyage de Bonite,” en 1886-7), Nouv. rech. sur l’Hydre et la Spongille, Paris, 1844, 8vo. ~—— Sar les corps reproducteurs des Eponges (Spongia usitalis- sima), Soc. Philom. Extr. Proc. Verb., 1848, pp. 40, 41, L’Institut, ix, No. 751, 1848, p. 160. Dosazprn (F.). Observations sur les Eponges et en particulier sur la Spongille ou Eponge d’eau douce, Ann. Scienc. Natur.,2 sér., Zoologie, tom. x, 1888, pp. 5—18. —— Histoire Naturelle des Zoophytes-Intusoires, 1840, pp. 805, 306. Maven (J.). Beitrage zur naheren Kenntniss unseres Siisswasser- Schwammes (Spongilla lacustris), Miiller’s Arch. f. Anat., 1839, p. 83. Hoeea (J.). On Spongilla fluvialitis, Proc. Linn. Soc., vol. i, 1839, pp. 8 and 36; 1840, p. 226; Trans. Linn. Soc. London, vol. xviti, 1841, p. 863; Charlesworth’s Mag. Nat. Hist., new ser., vol. iv, 1840, p. 259. —— Remarks on the Horny Sponges with proposed divisions of the Order Spongie, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. viii, 1842, p. 3. —— On Nardo’s classification of the Spongie, and further notices of the Spongilla fluvialitis, Ann. Nat. Hist., 2 ser., vol, 7, 1851, p. 190. Dovennoy (G. L.). Note sur une espéce d’fiponge qui se loge dans la coquille de l’huitre a-pied-de-cheval (Ostrea hippopus, Lam.) en creusant des canaux des d’epaisser des valves de cette coquille (Spongia terebrans), Comptes rendus, tom. ix, 1840, pp. 688—686, and 1840, pp. 1021—1028. : Bettamy (J. C.). Natural History of South Devon, 1840, London. Lerepouttet (A.). Sur une espéce d’Eponge perforante qui occupe |’épaisseur des valves de l’Huitre comestible (Spongia terebrans, Duv.), L’Institut, tom. ix, 1841, p. 131. Branconi (G. G.). Sopra alcuni Zoofiti descritti sotto i nomi di Cliona celata, Grant, Vioa Nardo, e Spongia terebrans, Du- vernoy. Estratto et osservazioni, Nuov. Ann. delle Sc. Nat. di Bologna, Anno iii, vol. vi, 1841, pp. 455—469. Bowsrrsank (J. 8.). Observations on a Keratose Sponge from Australia, Ann. Nat. Hist., vii, 1841, pp. 129—182. 202 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. BowerBank (J.8.). Onthe Keratose or Horny Sponge of Com- merce, Micros. Journal, vol. i, 1841, pp. 8—11; Micros. Soc. Trans., vol. i, 1844, pp. 32—39. —— Descriptions of three species of Sponge, containing some new forms of organisation, Micros. Journal, vol. i, 1841, pp. 161, 162. Micros. Soc. Trans., vol. i, 1844, pp. 683—76. —— On a new genus of Calcareous Sponges (Dunstervillin), Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. xv, 1845, pp. 297-300. —— Observations on the Spongiadw with descriptions of some new genera, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. xvi, 1845, pp. 400—410. — Ciliary action in Sponges, Trans. Micros. Soc., vol. iii, 1852, pp. 187—142. — On the vital power of the Spongiade, Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1856, pp. 488—451. — Further Report on the vitality of Sponges, Brit. Assoc. Report, 1857, pp. 121—125; Micros. Soc. Quart. Jour., vol. vi, 1858, pp. 78, 79. —— Anatomy and physiology of the Spongiade, Proc. Royal Soc., vol. viii, 1857, p. 573; and Ann, Nat, Hist., vol. xx (2 ser.), 1857, p. 298. —— On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadsz, Philos. Trans., 1858, pp. 279—332, and 1862, pp. 747—886 and 1087 —1135. —— On the organisation of Grantia ciliata, Trans. Micros. Soc., new ser., vol. vii, 1859, pp. 79—84. —~ A Monograph of the Spongillide, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1863, pp. 440—472. —— On Hyalonema mrabilis in reply to Dr. Gray, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. xviii, 1866, p. 397; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, pp. 18 and 350. —— On Aleyoncellum (Huplectella) speciosum, Quoy and Gaimard, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 851; Ann. Nat, Hist., ser. 4, vol. iii, p. 84. —— Observations on Dr. Gray’s “ Notes on the arrangement of. Sponges, with the description of some new genera,” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1868, p. 118, and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol, iii, p. 84. —— Monograph of the Siliceo-Fibroug Sponges, Proc. Zool. Soc, Lond., 1869, pt. 1, p. 66; pt. 2, p. 328; pt. 3, 1875, p. 272; pt. 4, 1875, p. 508 ; pt. 5, 1875, p. 558; pt. vi, 1876, p. 535. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 203 Bowrnsanx (J. S.). Remarks on the genus Theonella, Gray, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1869, p. 389. Report on a collection of Sponges found in Ceylon by E. W. Holdsworth, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 18738, p. 25. —— Reply to Dr. J. E. Gray’s observations on certain Sponges described in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society for 1878, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xii, 1878, p. 488. —— Observations on Mr. Carter’s paper “On two new Sponges,” &e., Ann. Nat, Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 58. Contributions to a general history of the Spongiade, i—iii, Proe. Zool. Soc. London, 1872, pp. 115, 196, and 625; iv and v, 1878, pp. 8 and 833; vi, 1874, p. 298; vii, 1875, p. 582; viii, 1876, p. 768. -— Further Observations on Alcyoncellum speciosum and Hyalo- nema mirabile, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1875, p. 607. —— Description of five new Sponges discovered by Dr. A. B. Meyer on the Philippine Islands and New Guinea, Proce. Zool. Soc., 1877, p. 456. Owen (R.). On a new genus and species of Sponge Huplectella aspergillum, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., vol. ix, 1841, p. 3; Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., vol. iii, 1849, p. 203; also Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. viii, 1842, p. 222. — Description of a new species of EHuplectella a cucwmer, Owen), Trans. Linn. Soc., vol. xxii, 1857, p. 117. Srurcusury (S.). Description of a new sponge from Barbadoes (Dactylocalyx pumicea), Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1841, p. 86, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. ix, 1842, p. 504. Coucn (R. Q). Observations on the Sponges of Cornwall, Report Royal Polytechnic Soc. of Cornwall, 1842, p. 41. Costa (O. G.). Fauna de Regno di Napoli-Polypi a polipario flessibili, Tethya, 1843 (contains figures and descriptions of three sponges). Avstin (Thom.). Note on Mr. Bowerbank’s paper on the genus Dunstervillia, with remarks on Ischadites Koningit, the Tenta- culites, and the Cornularia, Aun, Nat. Hist., vol. xv, 1845, p. 406. Micuenin (H.). Note sur différentes espéces du genre Vioa, Revue Zool., 1846, pp. 56—61. Enrenzere (C. G.). Ueber die geformten unkrystallinischen Kieseltheile von Pflanzen, besonders tiber Spongilla erinaceus in Schlesien, Berlin, Monatsber, 1846, p. 96. 20-4 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES, Earensere (0.G.). Beitrige zur Beurtheilung der wander baren Japanischen Glaspflanze, der sogenannten Corallenthier- Gattung Hyalonema and der Familie der Hyalochetiden, Berlin, Monatsber, 1860, pp. 173—182. Ueber die neueren die Japanische Glaspflanze als Spongia betreffenden Ansichten, und Erliuterungen der Synonyme zu Hrn. Bowerbank’s Spongolithen-Tafeln, Berlin, Monatsber, 1861, pp. 448—452. Ueber die nicht natiirliche Gestaltung der Glaspflanze Hyalo- nema Sieboldi, Gray, Berlin, Monatsber, 1863, pp. 3800— 305. —— Ueber Hyalonema lusitanicum, Berlin Monatsber, 1866, p. 810, and Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. xix, 1867, p. 419. —— Weitere Entwicklung des Hyalonema lusitanicum und der Spongiaceen, Berlin Monatsber, 1867, p. 843. Carter (H. J.). Notes on the species, structure, and animality of the Fresh-Water Sponges in the tanks of Bombay, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. i, 1848, pp. 308—311. ~— Descriptive account of the Fresh-Water Sponges in the Island of Bombay, with observations on their structure and development, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. iv, 1849, pp. 81— 100. — Zoosperms in Spongilla, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. xiv, 1854, pp. 335, 336. — On the ultimate structure of Spongilla, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. xx, 1857, pp. 21—41. —— On a variety of Spongilla Meyeni from the River Exe, Devon- shire, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. i, 1868, p. 247. Description of a Siliceous Sand Sponge found on the South- East Coast of Arabia, Ann, Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iii, 1869, p. 151. ——. Descriptive account of four Subspherous Sponges, Arabian and British, with general observations, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv, 1869, p. 1. —— On Grayella cyathophora, a new genus and species of Sponge, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv, 1869, p. 189. — Note on the Sponges Grayella, Osculina, and Cliona, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. v, 1870, p. 73. -—— On two new species of Subspherous Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, 1870, p. 176. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 205 Carrer (H.J.). On the ultimate structure of Marine Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, 1870, p. 829. —— On two undescribed Sponges and two Esperiade from the West Indies; also on the nomenclature of the Calcisponge Olathrina, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vii, 1871, p. 268. —— Account of three Pachytragous Sponges of South Coast of Devon., Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vii, 1871, p. 1. —— Deseription of two new Calcispongie, to which is added confirmation of Professor James Clark’s discovery of the true form of the Sponge-Cell Animal, and an account of the Polyp- like Pore Area of Cliona corallinoides contrasted with Haekel’s view of the relationship of the Sponges to the Corals, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. viii, 1871, p. 1. —— Parasites of the Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. viii, 1871, p. 330. —— Description and illustrations of a new species of Tethya, with observations on the nomenclature of the Tethyade, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. viii, 1871, pp. 99—105. —— On Fossil Sponge-Spicules of the Greensand compared with those of existing species, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vii, 1871, p. 112. — Additional information on this structure of Tethya dacty- loidea, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ix, 1872, p. 82. —— On two new Antarctic Sponges and New Zethya from Shet- land, &c., Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ix, 1872, p. 409. — Observations on the reproduction of Sponges commencing from the Zygosis of the Sponge Animal, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, ix, 1872, pp. 419—429. —— Proposed new name for the Sponge Animal, viz. ‘Spongo- zoon,’ and on origin of thread-cells in the Spongiade, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 45. —— New Aplysina from the North-West Coast of Spain, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 101. —— Two new Sponges from the Philippine Islands, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 110. —— Answer to Dr. Bowerbank’s observations, &c., Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x, 1872, p. 141. —- Description of Labaria hemispherica, Gray, a new species of Hexactinellid Sponge, with observations on the Sarco-hexacti- nellid Sponges generally, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xi, 1873, pp. 275 and 421, 206 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Canter (H. J.). Points of distinction between the Spongiade and the Foraminifera, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xi, 1878, p. 3651. ——— On two new species of Gugminee, with special and general observations, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xii, 1873, p. 17. —— On the Hewactinellide and Lithistide generally, and particu- larly on the Aphrocallistide, Anlodictye and Farree, together with facts elicited from their deciduous structures and descrip- tions respectively of three new species, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xii, 1873, pp. 349 and 487. —— On the Spongozoa of Halisarea Dujardiniz, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiii, 1874, p. 815. —— On Halisarca lobularis, Schnur, off the South Coast of Devon, with observations on the relationship of the Sponges to the Ascidians and hints on their microscopy, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiii, 1874, p. 433. —— The nature of the seed-like body of Spongilla; on the origin or mother-cell of the Spicule, and on the presence of sperma- tozoa in the Spongilla, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, 1874, p. 97. —— Deep-Sea Sponges and their Spicules from the Atlantic Ocean, dredged up on board H.M.S. ‘ Porcupine’ chiefly in 1869; with figures and descriptions of some remarkable Spicules from the Agulpas Shoal and Colon, Panama, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, 1874, pp. 221 and 245, pls. xili—xv. —— Development of the Marine Sponges from the earliest recognis- able appearance of the ovum to the perfected individual, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, 1874, pp. 321 and 3889. ——- Further instances of the Sponge-Spicule in the mother-cell, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xiv, 1874, p. 456. —— On the Genus Rosslia (a Hexactinellid Sponge) with the descriptions of three species, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xv, 1875, p. 118. — Notes introductory to the study and classification of the Spongida, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. xvi, 1875, pp. 1, 126, 177, pl. iii. —— Descriptions and figures of Deep-Sea Sponges and their Spicules, from the Atlantic Ocean; dredged on board H.M.S. ‘Porcupine,’ chiefly in 1862, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xviii, 1876, pp. 226, 307 and 458, pls. xii—xvi. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 207 Carter (H.J.). On two Vitreo-hexactinellid Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xix, 1877, p. 121, pl. ix. Arctic and Antarctic Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xx, p. 38, pl. i. Description of Mauricea, a Psammonematous Sponge (men- tioned incidentally), Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. xx, 1877, p. 174. —— Position of the Sponge-Spicule in the Spongida, and post- script on the identity of Sguamulina scopula with the Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. i, 1878, p. 170. —— On Teichonia, a new family of Calcareous Sponges, with descriptions of two species, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. ii, 1878, p. 35, pl. ii. —— Parasites of the Spongida, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. ii, 1878, p. 157. —— On Holastrella, a Fossil Sponge of the Carboniferous Era, and on Hemiastrella, a new genus of recent Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. iii, 1879, p. 141, pl. xxi. On a new species of Excavating Sponge (Alectona millari), and on a new species of Rhaphidotheca (R. afinis), Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc., vol. ii, 1879, p. 498, pls. xvii and xviii a. ——- Contributions to our knowledge of the Spongida, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. iii, 1879, pp. 284 and 343, pls. xxv—xxix. —— Sponges of Kerguelen Island mentioned, Phil. Trans., clxviii, 1879, p. 286. —— Report on specimens dredged up from the Gulf of Manaar,. and presented to the Liverpool Free Museum by Capt. W. H. Cawne Warren, Spongida, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. vi, 1880, pp. 35 and 129, pls. iv—viii; and Supplementary Report, vol. vii, 1881, p. 361, pl. xviii. — Description of two species of Suberites in D’Urban’s The Zoology of Barent’s Sea, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. vi, 1880, p. 256. —— History and classification of the known species of Spongiila, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. vii, 1881, p. 77, pls. v, vi. —— On Spongitla cinerea, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. vii, 1881, p. 263. Contributions to our knowledge of the Spongida, Order IT, Ceratina, Ann, Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. viii, 1881, p. 101, pl. ix. 208 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES, Canter (H. J.). The development of the fibre in Spongida, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. viii, 1881, p. 112, pl. ix (part). Contributions to our knowledge of the Spongida, Order I, Carnosa, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. viii, 1881, p. 241. . Korrte (F. F. E.). Utrum Spongie officinalis tela fibrosa Animal: an Vegetabili sit Natura, Berolini, 1848. Desor (E.). Two new Sponges (Spongia arceolata and sulphurea), Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. iii, 1848, p. 67. Hawcock (A.). On the excavating powers of certain Sponges belonging to the genus Cliona, with descriptions of several new species and an allied generic form, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. iii, 1849, pp. 8321—348. — Note on the Excavating Sponges, with description of four new species, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. xix, 1867, p. 229; and also Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumb, and Durham, vol.i, 1867, p. 337. Mayer (Pére). Recherches sur l’organisation des Eponges, Compt. rend. et Mém. de la Soc. de Biologie, tom. i, 1849, p. 153. Houxtery (T. H.). On the anatomy of the genus Tethya, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, vol. vii, 1851, p. 370. —— Manual of Anatomy of Invertebrated Animals, 1877, pp. 110 —120, Porifera Dozrz (W. M.). Ooservations on Cilia in Grantia, Goodsir’s Ann. of Anat. and Physiol., No. 2, 1852, pp. 127 and 129. Srrickranp (H. E.). On the mode of growth in Halichondria suberea, Report Brit. Assoc., 1853, Trans. Soc., p. 72. Gossz (P. H.). Naturalists Rambles on the Devonshire Coast, 1853 (Grantia botryoides and ciliata), pp. 284—289, pl. xv. Manual British Marine Zoology, 1855, ii, pp. 1—6. Scuarryer. Einige Bemerkungen tiber Spongilla fluviatilis, Ver- handlung. d. Naturh. Ver. den preuss. Rhein., 12 Jahrg., 1855, p. 29. Lerpy (J.). On Cliona, Proc. Acad. Nat. Philad., vol. viii, 1856, p. 162; Sillim. Amer. Journ., 2 ser., vol. xxiii, 1857, pp. 281, 282. —— Remarks on some curious Sponges (Hyalonema, Euplectella, Pheronema), American Naturalist, vol. iv, p. 17. — Remarks on Sponges, Proc. Acad. Philadelphia, 1874, p. 144, WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 209 Lizzrrkiun (N.). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Spongillen, Miiller’s Archiv f. Anat., 1856, pp. 1—19, 399—414, and 496 —514 (translated Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. ii, vol. xvii, 1856, pp. 403—418; and Quart. Jour. Mic. Sci., vol. v, 1857, p. 212 —219). Beitrige zur Anatomie der Spongien, Miiller’s Archiy f. Anat. 1857, pp. 376—403. -— Neue Beitrage zur Anatomie der Spongien, Reichert’s u. Du Bois Raymond’s Archiv f. Anat., 1859, pp. 353—382, and 515 —530. Ueber Bewegungserscheinungen bei den Schwammen, Reichert, - Archiv, 1863, pp. 717—730. ——— Ueber das contractile Gewebe der Spongien, Reichert u. Du Bois Raymond’s Archiv, 1867, p. 74 (translated Ann, Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi, 1870, p. 497. Branvt (J. F.). Symbole ad Polypos Hyalochetides spectantes, 1859, folio, 4 plates (Hyalonema). Vatencrznnzs (A.). Note sur les Spongiaires (Adythia) envoyés des cétes de l’Altique, par M. Albert Gaudry, Comp. rend., 1860, vol. li, p. 579. Lzcog (Henri). Observations sur une grande espéce de Spongille du lac Pavin, Compt. rend. Acad. Se. Paris, tom. 1, 1860, pp. 1116—1121. —— Observations sur les corps reproducteurs et sur l’etat d’agre- gation d’une grande espéce de Spongille du lac Pavin (Puy de Dome), Paris, Comptes rendus, tom. 1, 1860, pp. 1165—. 1170. —— Observations sur le degré d’animalité et sur les espéces de Spongilles, et particulitrement sur la grande espéce du Jac Payin, Paris, Comptes rendus, li, 1860, pp. 5, 9. Scuuttze (Max S.). Ueber eine merkwiirdige Spongie Hyalonema, Rhein]. u. Westphal. Sitzungsber., Bd. xvii, 1860, pp. 67, 69, Paris, Comptes rendus, tom. 1, 1860, pp. 792, 793. —— Ueber die Japanische Glasfadenspongie, Rheinl. u. Westphal. Sitzungsber., Bd. xvii, 1860, p. 85. —— Ueber einen Schwamm mit Nadeln aus Hornsubstanz, Vern Nat. Ver. preuss. Rheinlande und Westph., 1865, p. 7. — On Hyalonema, Archiv f. Mikrosk. Anatomie, Bd. iii, Heft 2, 1867, p. 206; and also Ann, Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. xix, 1867, p. 153. VOL, IV. 14, 210 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Scumript (Oscar). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres, 1862. Supplement der Spongien des adriatischen Meeres, 1864. —— Zweites Supplement der Spongien des adriatischen Meeres, enthaltend die Vergleichung der adriatischen und britischen Spongiengattungen, 1866. —— Spongiologische Mittheilungen, Schultze’s Archiv f. Microscop. Anatomie, Bd. iii, Heft 3, 1867, p. 390. — Vorlaiufiger Bericht tiber die Untersuchung der Bowerbank’s- chen Spongien, Sitzungsb. Akad. Wiss., Wien, Band liii, p. 147. —— Die Spongien der Kiiste von Algier, mit Nachtragen zu den Spongien des adriatischen Meeres, 1868. —— Kieselspongien in der Zweite deutschen Nordpolarfahrt in 1869-70, Leipzig, 1874, p. 429. — Vorliufige Mittheilungen iiber die Spongien der grénlandis- chen Kiiste, Mitth. des Naturwis. Vereines. f. Steiermark., Bad. ii, Heft 1, 1869, p. 89. —— Grundziige einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes, 1870. —— Das Natiirliche System der Spongien, Mittheil. der Naturwiss- schaft. Vereins f. Steiermark, 1870, Band 2, Heft 2. —— Spongien, p. 115, Zoologische Ergebnisse der Nordseefahrt vom 21 Juli bis 9 September, 1872, Berlin, 1874 (Seperatab- druck aus dem H. Jahresberichte der Kommission zur Unter-- suchung der deutschen Meere in Kiel). —— Nochmals die Gastrula der Kalkschwimme, Archiv Mikr. Anat., Bd. xii, 1876, p. 551. —— Das Larven-Stadium von Ascetia primordialis und Ascetta clathrus, Arch. Mikr. Anat., Bd. xiv, 1877, p. 249, pls. xv and xvi. —— Spongien des Meerbusens von Mexico, Heft i, Jena, 4to., 1879. —— Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (und des Caraibis- chen Meeres), zweites (Schluss—) Heft, 4ito., 1880. Lorenz. Physicalische Verhiltnisse und Vertheilung der Organ- ismen im Quarnerischen Golfe, Wien, 1863. BatsaMo-CrivELui (G.). Memoria di alcuni Spongiarj del Golfo - di Napoli, Atti Soc. Ital. di Sci. Nat., vol. v, 1863. Koriixer (Albert). Ueber den Bau der Spongien, Wiirz-- burg, Naturw. Zeitschr. Bd. v, 1864 (Sitz. Ber., 1868), Pp xv. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 911 Koruxer (Albert). Icones Histiologicw. Erste Abtheilung, der feinere Bau der Protozoen, 1864. Beltremieux. Faune du départment de la Charente-Inferieure, 4to., 1864, Ducuassarne (P.) and Micurtorri (G.). Spongiares de la mer Caraibe, Haarlem, 1864. Ducuassarne (P.). Revue des Zoophytes et des Sponges des Antilles, Paris, 1870. Hartine (P.). Bijdrage tot de kennis der silvpiceoianks fauna en flora van de Banda-Zee, Verhand. k. Akad. Wetensch., Bd. x, 1865, p. 1. —— Memoire sur le genre Poterion, Natur. Verhand. uitgeven dvor det provincial Utrechtsch Genootschap van kunsten en Wetenschappen, Bd. ii, 1870, p. 2. ; Crarx (H. J.). Conclusive proofs of the animality of the Ciliate Sponges, and of their affinities with the Infusoria flagellata, Amer. Jour. Sci., 2nd series, Nov., 1866, p. 320, and Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. xix, 1867, p. 13. ~—— On the Spongie ciliate as Infusoria flagellata; or observa- tions on the structure, animality and relationship of Leuco- solenia botryoides, Bowerbank, Memoirs Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist., vol. i, part 3, p. 805; and also Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. i, 1868, pp. 188, 188, and 250. —— Note on the Infusoria flagellata and the Spongie ciliate, Amer. Jour. Science, ser. 3, vol. i, 1871, p. 118, and vol. ii, p. 426; also Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, 1871, vol. vii, p. 247. —— The American Spongilla a Craspedote Flagellate Infusorian, Amer. Jour. Sci., ser. 8, vol. ii, 1871, p. 427; Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ix, 1872, p. 71; Month. Micros. Journal, vii, 1872, p. 104, pl. xi. Hicxen (E.). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Bd. ii 1866, p. 29. —— Ueber den Organismus der Schwimme und ihre Verwandt- schaft mit den Corallen, Jenaische Zeitschrift, Bd. v, 1869, pp. 207—254, translated Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vy, 1870, pp. 1—18 and. 107—120. Prodromus eines Systems der Kalkschwimme, Jenaische Zeit- schrift, Bd. v, 1869, p. 286, translated Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. v, 1870, pp. 176—191. 212 WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. Hicxet (E.). Ueber die sexuelle Fortpflanzung und das natiir- liche System der Schwimme, Jenaische Zeitschrift fiir Med. und Naturwiss., Bd. vi, 1871, pp. 641—651. —— Die Kalkschwimme, eine Monographie, 8 vols., 4to., 1872. —— Kalk und Gallertspongien. Die zweite deutsche Nordpolar- fahrt in 1869-70, Leipzig, 1874, p. 434. —— Die Physemarien (Haliphysema und Gastrophysema), Gastra- aden der Gegenwart, Jenaische. Zeitschr., xi, 1876, pp. 1—54, pls. i—vi (Biologische Studien, ii, Studien zur Gastroea- Theorie, 1877). Semper (C.). Einige Worte iiber Huplectella aspergillum und seine Bewohner, Archiv f. Naturg. Jahrg, xxxiii, 1867, i, Heft i, p. 84. SrLenKxa (Emil). Ueber einige neue Schwimme aus der Siidsee, Zeitschr. f. Wissensch. Zoologie, Bd. xvii, 1867, p. 565. — Ueber einen Kieselschwamm von achtstrahligem Bau, und iiber Entwicklung der Schwamm-knospen, Zeit. Wiss. Zool., Bd. xxxiii, 1879, p. 467, pls. xxvii, xxviii. Bocacse (J. V. B. du). On Hyalonema lusitanicum, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. xx, 1867, p. 123. Notes on Hyalonema boreale and on a new genus of Sponge, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ii, 1868, p. 36. —— Eponges siliceuses nouvelles de Portugal et de l’ile Saint Jago (Archipel de Cap-Vert), Journ. des Scien. Math. Phys. et Natur. Lisbonne, 1869, No. 4, p. 159, 2 plates. —— Sur lV’existence de la Holtenia Carpenteri, Wyville Thomson dans les cétes du Portugal, Jornal de Scientias de Academia Real de Lisbon, 1870, p. 79. Craus (C.). Ueber Huplectella aspergillum, Owen, ein Beitrag zur Naturgeschichte der Kieselschwimme Marburg, 1868, 4to., 4 plates. Traite de Zoologie, 1878 (troisiéme édition), tom. i, pp. 159— 169. Parrirt (Edward). On the Marine and Fresh-Water Sponges of Devonshire, Trans. Devonshire Assoc. Advanc. Science, Litera- ture and Art, 1868. THomson (Wyville). On the Vitreous Sponges, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser, 4, vol. i, 1868, p. 114. —— On the depths of the Sea (contains illustration of Holtenia Carpenteri), Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ivy, 1869, p. 112. WORKS AND PAPERS ON SPONGES. 213 THomson (Wyville). On Holtenia Carpenteri, a new genus and species of Vitreous Sponges, Proc. Royal Soc., June 17th, 1869; Phil. Trans., 1869, p. 701, pls..lxvii—lxxi; abstract in Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv, 1869, p. 284. —— The Depths of the Sea, London, 1878. —— Voyage of the ‘ Challenger,’ The Atlantic, 1877, 2 vols. Mazrens (E. von). Hin Siisswasserschwamm aus Borneo, Archiv. f, Naturg., 1868, Bd. xxxiv, p. 61. Hexxxots (J. A.) and Marsnatt (W.). Notice sur deux espéces nouvelles d’Eponges de la Famille des Lophospongie, Archives Néerlandaises, tom. iii, 1868, 5me Liv., p. 435. Lovén (S.). Om en markligi Nordsjén lefvande Art af Spongia Gifvers. af k. Vet. Akad. Forhand., 1868, p. 105; also Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. ii, 1868, p. 81. Waicur (EH. Percival). Notes on Irish Sponges (52 species), Proce. Royal Irish Academy, vol. x, 1868, p. 221. —— Note on Ayalonema, Aun. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ii, 1868, p. 320. Notes on Deep-Sea Dredging off the coast of Portugal, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. ii, 1868, p. 423. —— Notes on Sponges. 1. Hyalonema mirabilis, Gray. 2. Apro- callistes Bocagei, n. sp. 3. On a new genus and species of Deep-Sea Sponge [Wyvillethomsonia Wallichii], Quart. Jour. Mic. Sci., 1870, p. 73. —— On a new genus and species of Sponge [Kallispongia Archeri], Proc. Roy. Irish » Grantii . 186 as eavernula +» imornata . 186 oF columella » limbata . 186 vs constrictus . » Montagui . . 185 ds copiosus » oculata ‘s . 185 sh fruticosus » seriata, . 187 incognitus . Ciocalypta 38 55 jecusculum . Leei 38 55 Jeffreysii iy penicillus . . 388 Re macilentus . Classified List of British 35 pannosus Sponges... . 5 ‘3 paupertas Clathria Beaniti . . 156 a perarmatus . » papilla . 187 i Peachii Clathrina sulphurea . 225 % plumosus Cliona Alderi . . 237 a rotalis . » celata . 90, 223 i similaris » corallinoides . 235 33 varians » gorgonoides. . 234 | Dictyocylindrus » gracilis . 236 9 aculeatus » Howsei. . 237 He fascicularis . » lobata . . 238 or hispidus » Northumbrica . 234 $5 Howsei » vastifica . 235 <3 pumilus Collingsia sarniensis 44 3 radiosus A Schmidtit . 44 - ramosus Corybas lobata . 139 i rectangulus . Cydonium Miilleri . 27 i rugosus. % stuposus 3 ventilabrum . D. es virgultosus Diplodemia Dendoryxalbula . . 112 + vesicula 45 Batei . 111 | Dirrhopalum coriaceum " Dickiet . - 110 | Distribution, geographical 9 granulata . 114 tableof . . ; 3 incrustans 110 | Donatia aurantium o irregularis . 110 | Dunstervillia elegans PAGE . 11 . 105 93 . 93 . 170 . 180 . 179 . 182 . 174 . 178 . 170 . 176 . 170 . 176 . 173 . 179 . 179 Dysidea . ” fragilis 5 coriacea E. ‘Epicles radiosus Ephydatia fluviatilis Ecionemia : 53 coactura . os compressa a ponderosa Esperia egagrophila "4, florea 5 lingua » spinulenta . » subclavata . Euplectella brevis Sg mammillaris . 5 robusta . Euryphon clavatum F. Ficulina anomala . 33 ficus . G. Gastrophysema dithalamium . 3 scopula Gellius jugosus » robusta Geodia ‘ » megastrella . » Zetlandica . ae Geographical distribution Grantia . ‘ : » botryoides . ciliata. a 2 INDEX. PAGE . 188 | Grantia compressa . . 188 » ensata, . 189 » Nivea . » tessellata H. 56 . 168 | Halichondria . F F 30 a5 albula . 31 7 ambigua . . 380 ny angulata . 30 55 Batei . 180 i caduca . 162 ss candida . 162 . Clarket 52 is coalita 92, 3 coccinea 31 3 condensa . 82 coralloides 31 - corrugata . 55 3 Couchii 5 cylindracea ee Dickiei 3 distorta 6 edusa . 120 expansa 89 35 falcula 3 fallax Pe farinaria . 5 jimbriata . a flabellifera 33 a foliata 33 3 forceps . 181 x Sorcipis _ 171 a glabra 27 3 granulata . 27 8 Hyndmani 27 a incerta 15 ‘3 inconspicua . 25 3 incrustans . 226 9 Ingalli 25, 230 ae inornata . . 112 . U1 . 110 . 139 . 102 . 104 . 107 . 110 . 112 . 107 . 114 . 153 . 107 . 106 . 105 . 105 . 99 . 114 . 152 96 . 96 . 110 - 111 . 114 2-46 INDEX. PAGE Halichondria irregularis . 110 | Hymedesmia pulchella . 5 lingua . 162 Ss radiata a McIntoshii 95 3 simplicissima a mutulus . 96 ss stellata " nigricans . . 112 #3 tenuicula . 35 panicea . 98 3 Zetlandica. 3 Pattersoni . 111 | Hymeniacidon 55 pulchella . . ill 2 albescens es paupera . 139 3 Aldousii . % regularis . . 95 33 armaturus 35 Robertsoni . 100 PP armiger . 5 scandens . . 111 a aureus a simplex . 106 33 Brettii #8 subdola . 106 $5 Bucklandi oy Thompsoni . 105 ee callosus . a virgea . 112 Fr carnosus . Haliclona Columbee . 185 is caruncula ‘ gracilenta . 186 ” celatus Bs Montagui . 185 7 claviger . » pulmata . . 182 coccineus » pygmea . . 118 consimilis a seriata . 187 a crustula . v3 simulans . . 125 6 Dujardinii Halicnemia 45 FA fallaciosus = patera . 45 as fallax Halina Bucklandi . 93 55 ficus » carnosa 88 3 firmus » _ficus 89 ay floreum » suberea . 88 Ks foliatus . Halisarca Dujardinii 92, 238 i fragilis 35 lobularis . . 239 3 gelatinosus Halyphysema . : 33 3% Hillieri ramulosa . 38 mS jecusculum 8 primordiale 33 9 lacteus 3 Tumanowiczii . 33 35 lingua _ Tumanowiczii . 38 > macilentus Hymedesmia . . 56 pt mammeatus oy indistincta 56 5 medius ‘5 inflata 56 38 membrana a occulta 56 es pachyderma 5 pansa. 56 5 paupertas “ Peachii 64 ” perarmatus » pilata 59 ” perlevis . PAGE . 162 - 162 INDEX. 94,7 PAGE PAGE Hymeniacidon placentula . 73 | Isodictyacrassa . ‘ . 126 9 plumiger . 88 3 deformis . ‘ . 160 3 plumosus . 53 33 densa : Z . 125 es radiosus . . 84 5 dichotoma 3 . 123 reticulatus . 75 56 dissimilis . : . 135 » sanguineus . 81 9 dubia “ si . 140 és solidus . . 76 si Edwardii . A . 138 ae subclavatus . 92 a elegans. g . 121 55 subereus . . 88 5 fallax : : rae Ay 99 sulphureus . 89 % ferula : ‘ . 116 ae tegeticula . 76 3 filamenta . : . 129 * tenebrosus . 90 A fimbriata . , . 153 5 Thomasii Paral % fistulosa . ‘ . 123 5 varians . . 85 45 fucorum . : . 188 5 variantia . 85 - funalis . 4 . 150 virgultosus . 83 » gracilis . . . 186 a virgulatus . 84 ” Gregorii . . . 125 9% viridans. . 86 » hispida . . . 186 Hymeraphia . . . . 54 » Hyndmani . . 152 os clavata . 55 PA imitata . , . 141 & coronula . . 55 35 implicita . Z . 154 53 simplex . . 55 s5 ineequalis . ‘ . 157 ae stellifera . . 55 a incerta . i . 126 55 vermiculata . 54 3 indefinita , . 118 <3 verticillata . . 55 ss indistincta ‘ . 119 5s infundibuliformis . 135 33 Ingalli.. : . 126 I. - invalida . . . 186 <9 involuta . : . 143 Idomon Alderi : ‘ . 237 i jugosa. : . 131 Lophon nigricans. ‘ . 112 3 laciniosa . ‘ . 140 » scandens. : . 111 35 lobata ‘ . 189 Isodictya . : . 115 5 lurida. . . 152 5 Alderi. : . 138 F luteosa . : . 120 7 anomala . ; * 120 37 mammeata . 115 ee Barleei . ‘ . 140 i McAndrewi . . 122 5 Beanii ; . 150 52 nodosa. ; . 141 5 Bowerbanki . . 128 3 Normani . ‘ . 186 a cinerea. é . 115 8 obscura . 5 . 118 5 Clarkei . F . 139 3 pallida . : . 125 9 clava F F . 130 33 palmata . ‘ . 1832 oi collina . : . 147 a parasitica ; . 120 35 coriacea . ' . 136 5 paupera . .-7 . 189 248 Isodictya paupercula 35 Peachii 3 permollis . 3 perplexa . 5 pertenuis . = pocillum . ” pygmea ramusculus 5 robusta. 3 rosea, Bs rugosa 3 scitula oy simplex 3 simulans . simulo 3 trunca sa tumulosa . 3 uniformis. 33 varians K. Keratosa L. Laothoe verticillata . Leucaltis pumila Leucandra ananas . caminus fistulosa 3 Gossei . Johnstonii oe nivea Leucogypsia . Fr Gossei T.euconia ‘ ‘ fistulosa . Johnstonii a nivea ‘ pumila ” . INDEX. PAGE . 129 | Leuconia Somesii . . 120 | Leucosolenia . . 115 a botryoides . 123 3 contorta . 144 coriacea . 119 i lacunosa . 118 | Leucyssa incrustans . 115 . 170 . 118 M. . 153 . 146 | Menyllus Ingalli . 119 | Mesapos stellifera . . 125 | Microciona . 128 Gs ambigua . 132 5 armata. . 153 Ms atrasanguinea . 139 is carnosa . 121 m fallax . : = fictitia . 5 fraudator 45 jecusculum . ‘i Kentii . . 183 se levis . 5 plumosa 5 simplicissima x spinulenta vs tumulosa . 55 | Mycalelingua. . . . 227 . 229 . 228 N. . 228 . 228 | Nenia verticillata . . 229 | Normania 229 | a crassa . 26 26, 228 . 26 0. 26, 228 . 229 | Oceanapia Jeffreysit 26, 229 | Ophlitaspongia : 26, 227 5 papilla . PAGE 26 - 26 25, 226 25, 226 26, 226 26, 226 . 227 . 111 55 49 53 53 54 53 52 50 53 49 52 53 52 52 50 . 162 55 28 29 . 171 . 187 . 187 Ophlitaspongia seriata . Orina angulata P. Pachastrella Bucklandi . Pachymatisma : 3 Johnstonia Papillina suberea Pencillaria mammillaris Phakellia ; i 3 infundibuliformis i robusta . a ventilabrum Philotia varians Pione Northumbrica Polymastia 2 brevis . 3 bulbosa 5 conigera re mamuillaris i ornata . 55 radiosa 5 robusta Py spinula Pronae plumosa » lobata. Q. Quasillina brevis R. Radiella spinularia Raphioderma . i ‘5 coacervata . Raphiodesma . : . fallaciosum floreum 33 ” VOL. IV. 249 INDEX. PAGE PAGE . 187 | Raphiodesma intermedium . 166 99 re lingua . 162 PS simplicissimum 163 35 sordidum . . 163 Raphyrus ‘i . 182 ” Griffithsii . 182 93 | Raspailia radiosa 46 28 i ramosa . 45 28 ii (?) stelligera 46 . 182 95 stuposa 48 382 si (P) viminalis 46 48 a3 virgultosa 47 . 185 | Reniera albescens 70 48 armatura . 86 48 a aurea 86 121 » Brettic 75 . 234 5 caruncula . 81 81 56 coccinea 72 31 >» consimilis . 83 31 » erustula 79 33 » fallaciosa . 75 32 » fallax. 83 31 » fragilis 75 32 » lactea 72 31 i mammeata . 82 32 z membrana . 72 . 538 » pachyderma 79 . 238 Pe perlevis 79 » reticulata . 75 » sanguinea . 81 ss Thomasii . 71 » virgultosa . 83 31 45 viridans 86 S. . 45 | Scopalina fallax . 5 162 | Scypha ovata . . 229 . 162 | Seriatula seriata . 187 . 162 | Silicea . F : P . 27 . 163 | Siphonochalina (?) Flemingii . 185 162 | Sophax fallax . » 2 17 250 INDEX. PAGE T, Spinularia tetheoides . . 45 Spongelia fragilis . 188 | Tereus fimbriatus Spongia ananas , 229 | Tethea, see Tethya. a limbata . 186 | Tetilla cranium » pulchella . 183 | Tethya : » pulverulenta 229 » abyssorum . Spongilla ; . 168 » Collingsii . 4 fluviatilis 168 » cranium 35 lacustris . . 169 » ‘mfrequens . is Mayeni . . 168 » yncurium » Parfitti . . 168 » morum : » sceptrifera 169 » ‘muricata Spongionella. . . . 183 » Schmidtii . iy pulchella . 183 » spinosa Squamulina scopula . 33, 38 » Sspinularia . Stelletta aspera . . . 380 Zetlandica . 5 Collingsii : . 44 Timea stellata . a lactea 240 | Tragosia infmadtbulaformie % Schmidtii . ‘ . 44 ” dissimilis . Suberites carnosa . 88 | Trichogypsia villosa a clavigera . . . 90 4 domuncula. . 88 U. a fe ues : - 89 Ute capillosa . si gelatinosa . 88 » glabra suberea . ‘ . 88 » urticulus . sulphurea : . 89 Gycentira ciliata . 230 Vv. i compressa, . 232 . » coronata. 930 | Verongia as 1 » elegans . . 231 » Zetlandica 7 glabra 931 | Vibulinus aculeatus . » utriculus 232 a OES villosa. 981 Vioa celata Aveta penicillata 229 Ww Syconella quadrangulata 230 : Sycortis quadrangulata . 230 | Wyvillethomsonia Wallichii . PRINTED BY J. E. ADLARD, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE. 29 PLATE I. ‘* HyMEDESMIA PANSA, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—A small portion of the sponge, exhibiting the mode of fasciculation and disposition of the skele- ton fasciculi. XX 250 linear. Fig. 2.—One of the long, slender, acuate spicula of the skeleton fasciculi. Xx 420 linear. Fig. 3.—Represents one of the attenuato-acuate, entirely spined defensive spicula. Xx 420 linear. Fig. 4.—One of the bidentate, equi-anchorate, re- tentive spicula. x 420 linear.” ‘* HYMEDESMIA TENUICULA, Bowerbank. Fig. 5.—Represents a portion of the flat fasciculi composed of numerous attenuato-spinulate spicula, and the irregular mode of their disposition. x 150 linear. Both the species figured above depend for their identification on their microscopical structures alone; figures of their extremely thin substances would not contribute in the slightest degree to their identifica- tion,” ' Hymedesmia pansal 4. H. tenmeculad. Dinked del et ith. West & Co.rmp. PLATE II. ‘* HYMEDESMIA PILATA, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—Represents a small portion of the sponge exhibiting the nodes of the disposition of the skeleton and other spicula of which it is composed. Xx 264 linear. Fig. 2.—One of the contort, bihamate, retentive spicula of the dermal membrane. X 420 linear. Fig. 3.—One of the attenuato-acuate, basally spined, skeleton spicula. X 264 linear. Fig. 4.—An attenuato-acuate, entirely spined, inter- nal defensive spiculum. X 308 linear.” ‘* HYMEDESMIA PULCHELLA, Bowerbank. Fig. 5.—A small portion of the type-specimen ex- hibiting the loosely formed and irregularly disposed fasciculi of the skeleton structures. X 264 linear. Fig. 6.—One of the slender, attenuato-acuate, ske- leton spicula. xX 420 linear. Fig. 7.—A long and slender, attenuato-acuate, ba- sally spinous, skeleton spiculum. X 420 linear. Fig. 8.—One of the angulated, bidentate, equi-ancho- rate, retentive spicula. x 420 linear. Figures of the natural size of both the above- described sponges are omitted, as they would not have assisted in the slightest degree in the discrimination of the species.” Plate il. Hymedesmia pilatal—-4. H.pulchella 5-8. Dinkel dal et ith West &Co. tmp. PLATE III. ** Hymenracipon Hinuierr, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—Represents the sponge in the condition in which it came from the sea. Natural size. Fig. 2.—A subspinulate spiculum from the skeleton. x 158 linear. Fig. 3.—An acuate skeleton spiculum. xX 158 linear.” ‘* HYMENIACIDON soLipus, Bowerbank. Fig. 4.—Represents the sponge in the dry state. Natural size. Fig. 5.—A small portion of the reticulate, dermal membrane. X 94 linear. Fig. 6.—One of the fusiformi-acerate spicula of the dermal rete and of the skeleton. 158 linear. Fig. 7.—Two of the slender acerate spicula of the skeleton. > 158 linear. These spicula are frequently more or less flexuous.” Plate Ii. say Hymeniacidon Hillieri 1-3 H.sohdus 4 West & Co 17g Dinkel del et ith PLATE IV. Isopictya scituta, Bowerbank. Figs. la, 1b, 1c.—Acuate spicules of the skeleton, to show their variation in size. x 150. Fig. 2.—One of the bidentate, equi-anchorate, reten- tive spicula. x 800. Figs. 3a and 8b.—Angulated bihamate spicula of the dermal membrane, more abundant than the last but not mentioned in the description of the species. x 800. For figures of the sponge itself see Plate IX, figs. 1—3. HYMENIACIDON VIRGULATUS, Bowerbank. Fig. 4.—The sponge. Natural size. Fig. 5.—One of the long, slender, acuate spicula of the skeleton. > 150. HyMeEntactpon caLLosus, Bowerbank. Figs. 6 and 7.—The type-specimens of the sponge. Natural size. Fig. 8.—One of the acuate spicula of the skeleton. x 150. [Fig. 9.—A hydroid zoophyte, parasitical on H. cal- losus, and inserted in the Plate by the engraver by mistake. | HYMENIACIDON ARMIGER, Bowerbank. Fig. 10.—Hymeniacidon armiger. Natural size. Thinly coating the basal portion of a specimen of Nullipora polymorpha. Figs. 11, 12 and 13.—Attenuato-acuate, entirely spined, dermal spicules, showing their variability in. size. xX 150. Fig. 14.—A fusiformi-acerate spicule of the skele- ton. X 150. Fig. 15.—A bidentate equi-anchorate spicule of the dermal membrane. x 800. Figs. 16 and 17. Tridentate, equi-anchorate, reten- tive spicula. > 800. Plate IV. i| De Hh o | ¢ rr ak AN, | | | ‘a | 4 | i | | | M \y y \ | be \ | ) i /. 9 i & oes >) (NN 16 if 15 4 V1 a. | i u 7 | ee | 1 | j | | : | Hh hs Isodictya scitula 1-3. Hymeniacidon virgulatus 4-5. Hymeniacidon ecallosus 6-8 Hymeniacidon armiger 10-17. AT Holluck del, et ith. West, Newnran & Co ump PLATE V. “ FALICHONDRIA VIRGEA, Bowerbank. Figs. 1 and 2.—Represent the largest of the four specimens of the species sent to me by Mr. Norman. Natural size. Fig. 8.—A small portion of the dermal membrane, exhibiting the mode of the fasciculation of the spicula. xX 264 linear. Fig. 4.—One of the subfusiform, basally spinous, acuate, skeleton spicula. XX 264 linear. Fig. 5.—A long and slender, acuate, tension spicu- lum from the dermal membrane. x 264 linear. Fig. 6.—A large bidentate, equi-anchorate, reten- tive spiculum from the dermal membrane. X 400 linear. Fig. 7.—One of the small and numerous bidentate, equi-anchorate, retentive spicula. > 400 linear.” “ HALicHonpRIA Rosertsoni, Bowerbank. Fig. 8.—Represents the sponge in the dried state. Natural size. Fig. 9.—A small portion of the dermal membrane, exhibiting the broad, flat, irregularly dispersed fasciculi of the dermis. X 94 linear. Fig. 10.—A fully-developed, hastate, cylindrical spiculum from the dermal membrane. X 264 linear. Fig. 11.—One of the largest of the tridentate, equi- anchorate, retentive spicula from the dermal mem- brane. X 400 linear. Fig. 12.—One of the smallest tridentate, equi- anchorate, retentive spicula from the dermal mem- brane. > 400 linear. Fig. 13.—One of the minute and slender, bihamate, retentive spicula from the dermal membrane. Xx 400 linear. Fig. 14.—One of the short and stout, basally and seventh spined, acuate skeleton spicula. x 3808 inear. Plate V. Dinkel del ot kth West & Co. tings Halechondria virgeal—T H.Robertsoni 8—14, PLATE VI. ‘* FHALICHONDRIA CONDENSA, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—Represents the sponge based on a small fragment of a bivalve shell. Natural size. Fig. 2.—A small portion of the dermal membrane exhibiting the unispiculous structure of its rete. x 94 linear. Fig. 3.—One of the short, stout, acerate spicula of the skeleton. Xx 160 linear.” ** HALICHONDRIA CYLINDRACEA, Bowerbank. Fig. 4.—Represents the sponge covering nearly the whole of the carapace of a specimen of Inachus Dorsetensis, and appearing in small patches on some of its legs. Natural size. Fig. 5.—One of the subcylindrical acerate spicula of the dermal membrane. xX 264 linear. Fig. 6.—A bidentate, equi-anchorate, retentive spicu- lum from the dermal membrane. X 425 linear. Fig.7.— One of the small, slender, bihamate, retentive spicula from the dermal membrane. X 425 linear. Fig. 8.—One of the subcylindrical, acerate skeleton spicula. X 264 linear.” PlateVI. DH Se arpa) Halichondria condensa 1-3. H.cylndracea4-8. Dunkel del et itr. Wost &Co.vmp. PLATE VII. ‘* HALICHONDRIA CORALLOIDES, Bowerbank, Fig. 1.—Represents the sponge of the natural size. Fig. 2.—A small portion of the dermal membrane exhibiting the fasciculated structure of its rete. X 80 linear. ; Fig. 3.—One of the acerate skeleton spicula. x 150 linear.” ‘* HALICHONDRIA FLABELLIFERA, Bowerbank. Fig. 4.—Represents the sponge enveloping nearly the whole of a specimen of Nullipora polymorpha, natural size. Fig. 5.—A small portion of the dermal membrane showing the more or less fasciculation of its spicula. x 250 linear. Fig. 6.—One of the subfusiform cylindrical tension spicula of the dermal membrane. X 420 linear. Fig. 7.—One of the basally and occasionally apically spinous fusiform, acerate external defensive spicula. x 240 linear. Fig. 8.—A_ bidentate, equi-anchorate, retentive spi- culum from the dermal membrane. Xx 420 linear. Fig. 9.—One of the bidentate, retentive spicula from the dermal membrane. X 420 linear. Fig. 10.—A fusiformi-acuate skeleton spiculum. X 420 linear.” Plate VII. Halichondria coralloides 1-3. H.flabellhfera 4:—-10 Dirkeel del et: lath West & Co ump PLATE VIII. ‘**TsopIcTYA FERULA, Bowerbank. Figs. 1 and 2.—Represent the type-specimens of the species. Natural size. Fig. 3.—A skeleton spiculum. x 264 linear.” ‘6 TsopDIOTYA CRASSA, Bowerbank. Fig. 4.—Represents the type-specimen. Natural size. Fig. 5.—A small portion of the dermal membrane, exhibiting its reticulated structure. Fig. 6.—A skeleton spiculum.”’ Plate VII J Dunkel del et lith West: & Co. ump Q [eodictya terula)—3. l.erassa,4-6. PLATE IX. Isopictya soituta, Bowerbank. Figs. 1, 2 and 3.—Specimens of the sponge growing on Nullipora polymorpha. Natural size. For figures of the spicula of this sponge see Plate IV, figs. 1—3. IsopICTYA PERPLEXA, Bowerbank. Figs. 4 and 5.— Represent the type specimens of the sponge coating Nullipora polymorpha of the natural size. Fig. 6.—A portion of the dermal membrane. Fig. 7—One of the long fusiformi-acerate spicules of the skeleton. Plate IX Isodictya scitula 1-3 Isodictya perplexa 4-% Dinkel deb. el ath West Newmoiv& CY ump PLATE X. Tsopiotya iNvoLuTA, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—The type growing on Nullipora polymorpha. From Westport Bay. In the collection of the Rev. A. M. Norman. Fig. 2.—A portion of the dermal membrane. Fig. 3.—One of the slender, acuate, tension spicula. Fig. 4.—One of the stout acuate spicula of the skeleton. IsopIcTYA PAUPERCULA, Bowerbank. Fig. 5.—The type on the inside of a valve of Pecten varius. From Birterbuy Bay. In the cabinet of the Rey. A. M. Norman. Fig. 6.—A portion of the sparingly spiculous dermal membrane. Fig. 7.—Very slender acerate spicule of the dermal membrane. Fig. 8.—One of the stout acerate spicula of thee skeleton. [Fig. 9.—This Plate was engraved before Dr. Bower- bank’s death, but not lettered; nor was any descrip- tion of it to be found among the author’s papers. The bidentate equi-anchorate spicula (Fig. 9) 1s of very unusual form, but no sych spicule is referred to in the descriptions of the two sponges which are illustrated in this Plate. ] Wisse 4 ox fpecorip err i ate 3s SS Isodictya involuta i_4. lsodiclya paupercuia 5-8. J.Dinkel dol. eb lith. West Newmeur & O° tmp PLATE XI. **Microciona tumuLosa, Bowerbank, Figs. 1, 2.—Represent the type-specimens of the species. Natural size. Fig. 3.—A small portion of the skeleton structure of the sponge exhibiting the irregular mode of the disposition of the slender, compact, skeleton columns and the interstitial spicula dispersed amid them. x 94 linear. Fig. 4.—One of the skeleton spicula. x 264 linear.” “Tsopictya TRUNCA, Bowerbank. Fig. 5.—The type-specimen of the species. Natural size. Fig. 6.—A specimen of the species exhibiting a considerable variation in form. Natural size. Fig. 7.—One of the slender, acerate, dermal tension spicula. X 666 linear. Fig. 8.—A subfusiformi-acerate, skeleton spiculum. X 666 linear. Figs. 9, 10.—Two of the attenuato-acuate, internal, defensive spicula, exhibiting the variations in form and basal spination of their truncated bases. x 1166 linear.” Plate 2X, ent nana Microciona tumulosal—4. Isodictya trunca 5710. TJ. Dirt del. ct ith West & Co vrp PLATE XII. Isopictya HisPipa, Bowerbank. Figs. 1 and 2.—The typical specimens on Nullipora polymorpha. In the Rev. A. M. Norman’s collection. Natural size. Fig. 3.—A section of the dermis at right angles to the surface. Fig. 4.—A slender, acuate, tension spicule. Fig. 5.—Two of the bidentate, equi-anchorate, retentive spicula. Isopictya noposa, Bowerbank. Fig. 6.—The type from Birterbuy Bay. In the cabinet of the Rev. A. M. Norman. Natural size. Fig. 7.—One of the subfusiformi acuate spicula of the skeleton. Duricel bel et Meth Weet Newman & C Plate XIT Isodictya Inspida i-5. Isodiciya nodosa 6-7 odanp PLATE XIII. *‘ TsoDICTYA PERTENUIS. Bowerbank. Figs. 1, 2, 3.—Represent the type-specimens of the species. Natural size. Fig. 4.—One of the slender, acuate spicula of the skeleton. > 425 linear.” ** Hymepesmia Pracutt, Bowerbank. Fig. 5.—Represents the small, angular, dark- coloured stone, the white surfaces on which represent the sponge. Natural size. Fig. 6.—The fragment of a bivalve shell, the inner surface of which is nearly covered by the sponge. Natural size. Fig. 7—A small portion of the sponge from off the little angular stone, exhibiting the mode of the dis- tribution of the skeleton fasciculi and the retentive and large auxiliary skeleton spicula. 264 linear. Fig. 8.—One of the slender skeleton spicula from a fasciculus. > 264 linear. Fig. 9.—A large attenuato-acuate, basally spinous, auxiliary skeleton. X 264 linear. Fig. 10.—An internal, defensive, attenuato-acuate, entirely spined spiculum. X 264 linear. Fig. 11.—One of the small, bidentate, equi-ancho- rate, retentive spicula. > 425 linear. Fig. 12.—A large, tridentate, retentive spiculum, highly magnified to distinctly exhibit the slender central tooth at each termination. X 666 linear.” Plate XIII f IN SD. & Isodictya pertenuis1—4. Hymedesmia Peachii 5—lé TDinkel del et ith. West & Coimp PLATE XIV. IsopIoTYA DEFORMIS, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—Mr. Peach’s type-specimen on the inside of a valve of Mytilus edulis. From Wick. Fig. 2.— 666 linear. Fig. 8.—A tridentate, palmated, equi-anchorate, re- tentive spiculum. x 666 linear. Fig. 9.—One of the minute and slender bihamate, retentive spicula. xX 666 linear. Fig. 10.—A skeleton spiculum basally incipiently _ Spinous. x 308.” PlateXv. hath fe > SS \ SS 7 Hymemacidon tenebrosus. 1-5. Isodictya funalis. 6-10 STDinkel del ot bth. West Newnan & 0° vy PLATE XVI. © TsoDICTYA INZQUALIS, Bowerbank. Fig. 1.—Represents the type-specimen. Natural size. Fig. 2.—One of the subfusiformi-acerate tension spicula. xX 400 linear. Fig. 3.—One of the short attenuato-acerate tension spicula. xX 400 linear. Fig. 4.—A bidentate, equi-anchorate, retentive Spiculum. X 666 linear. Fig. 5.—One of the bihamate retentive spicula. X 666 linear. Fig. 6.—A subfusiformi-acuate basally and apically spinous skeleton spiculum. x 400 linear.” ** TsopioTya IMPLICITA, Bowerbank. Fig. 7.—Represents the type-specimen immersed amid the branches of Nullipora polymorpha. Natural size. Figs. 8. and 9.—Two of the smaller specimens of the species. Natural size. Fig. 10.—A small portion of the subfasciculate dermal membrane exhibiting the irregular mode of the disposition of the tension spicula. Xx 308 linear. Fig. 11.—One of the slender attenuato-acuate tension spicula, basally incipiently spinous, of the dermal membrane. X 400 linear. Fig. 12.—One of the stout attenuato-acuate basally spinous spicula of the dermal membrane. x 400 linear. This figure also represents the skeleton spicula. Fig. 13.—Represents two of the bipocillate anchorate retentive spicula of the dermal membrane. x 1166 linear. -Fig. 14.—One of the minute inequi-anchorate reten- __ tive spicula. > 1166 linear.” 4 a Isodictya TDurkel del et ith. Plate XVI. Soe 77 ine guahs1l-6. Limpheita 7-14 West Newmon & Coup. PLATE XVII. ** RAPHIODESMA INTERMEDIUM, Bowerbank. Figs. 1 and 2.—Represent the type-specimens of the species. Natural size. Fig. 8.—A small portion of the dermal membrane exhibiting the structure of the dermal rete and the mode of the disposition of the bihamate retentive spicula. x 160 linear. Fig. 4.—An average-sized skeleton spiculum. x 264 linear. Fig. 5.—One of the long and slender tension spicula of the interstitial membranes. > 264 linear. Fig. 6.—A contort, bihamate, retentive spiculum from the dermal membrane. X 264 linear.” *¢ RAPHIODESMA FALLACIOSUM, Bowerbank. Fig. 7.—Represents the shell of Pecten varius with the type-specimen of the sponge upon it opposite a. Natural size. Fig. 8.—One of the long and slender acuate spicula of the dermal fasciculi. >< 264 linear. Fig. 9.—A dentato-palmate inequi-anchorate reten- tive spiculum from one of the rosette-shaped groups of those spicula from the dermal membrane. None of the rosette-shaped groups were in a sufficiently perfect condition to render it desirable to figure them. xX 425 linear. Fig. 10.—One of the dispersed bidentate, inequi- anchorate, retentive spicula from the dermal mem- brane. X 426 linear. Fig. 11.—A contort, bihamate, retentive spiculum from the dermal membrane. xX 425 linear. Fig. 12.—One of the subfusiform acuate skeleton . Spicula. X 264 linear.” Plate XVII. FR. fatlaciosum Ae Raphiodesma intermedium |6. SI Dinrkel del till. West & Co amp. “6 oe nae fat UM 7 alge sty) z Ha) tees Taste, Ment ( fe eae His if i Bee y Dit Ay 6 ye 0 py i ee rf Hel Ae aly tata ne oh rs a CAL Mids te i eb otrrnts mag edetgsang ith, 424 Liat “ e Sey Sern Rk ‘i