ees

ee

ah

stottacotatathy

a RAR
Sou ie

KN!
tts

aN
Ay ‘ , it cian
st Salut nicea My uN y
i a laa swat a iN tyhghy by
ie alia th PSK ae
a
syns
eae
MAAS Mh
SSSR RG
arent ntar het)
aaa
ney

ay

ROE

baDLbe Ps peraPs

Haat 4
ah HOt
i POPUP APaPararabens pura
‘

DOU E ¥ ti Reeth

SH

WH

DRI i

eG

; iS s f
SESE OOLATD FM DCP aD BPD aaitite

SES PPAPSP RB Da PocoPaP enn aE anos DRO BED ij
cietis )

ittetetitetat
fee! PEM PaPa Pare PaP
Mites) ait

ia

DOP Pe
tity Kap 4
Haat &
EG

4 Gane tte
fafegeleate

eit

fsa

ePaper paper Dy

Hp rah ry!
Heeieenoniet
Andee

Ki

4 Ae aa h i ) gis itt
HA An AE A ( ‘ rena ile yeh
OANA Aah KHidaatits esti ut Win G Oo Mails i HE Byes,
MAH Wedd (et) yeh ety
POR iit tartare naa ties
{ id ESE L tts
ee ARR AM AMAR Eee
wee atk
és
,
Jy

5)

tf
SEG
it if i
Ay ; int sa
te ad iy i Tey vi pit hy,
Ong ye Tver rere ra Heft a Hite
Vr a Prete Wh

y
oy
(fe }
ie Asie fit

¥,

v he fied os
inde Wi (au
Bae Hi ay

Cee Ghd AA,
is Le Mee
CE a

id
heen de
tf

i
(et tas
ae
i
He iy fy)
a
De Gi (

Cornell University Library

BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE

SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND

THE GIFT OF

Henry W. Sage

18901

Q.304596. 00. AYE N16.

9306

Cornell University

The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.

There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.

http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024560058

THE
EVOLUTION
OF THE
VERTEBRATES
AND
THEIR KIN

PATTEN

THE

EVOLUTION

OF THE

VERTEBRATES

THEIR KIN

BY
WILLIAM PATTEN, Pu. D.

PROFESSOR OF ZOOLOGY, AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY
IN DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, HANOVER, N. H.

WITH 309 ILLUSTRATIONS

PHILADELPHIA
P. BLAKISTON’S SON & CO.
1012 WALNUT STREET

1912
9

COPYRIGHT, 1912, By P, Braxiston’s Son & Co,

Printed by
The Maple Press
York, Pa.

INTRODUCTION.

It is many years since a sustained attempt has been made to unite the various
branches of the animal kingdom into a natural, coherent system, or genealogical
tree, that would indicate the rise and decline of the important functions and
organs, map out the highways of organic evolution, and assign in geological terms
the approximate dates and surroundings for the critical events in structural in-
novation and readjustment that have marked its progress.

The most important problem involved in such an undertaking is to discover
which one, if any, of the many existing invertebrate phyla forms the trunk line of
descent from the lowest vertebrates to the ccelenterates, and through them to the
protozoa.

The vertebrates abruptly make their appearance as fully formed fishes, at
the close of the Silurian or the beginning of the Devonian. They were evidently
more highly organized than any of the invertebrate types that had appeared up to
that time, and they must have arisen, either by a marked transformation of some
of the known, preexisting types, or from some extinct and totally unknown ones.
On either supposition, the apparent absence of transitional forms is surprising,
since the relatively large size, distinctive form, and well developed skeleton of
primitive vertebrates, under the known conditions, should leave behind some
recognizable traces of their predecessors in the form of fossils.

The real missing links in the graded series of animal forms that most concern
the morphologist belong, therefore, to the Silurian period. There the main
trunk of the animal kingdom, upon which the whole vertebrate stock rests, is
lost, leaving without reason or warning a vast unknown abyss beside which the
gap between man and his immediate predecessors sinks into microscopic in-
significance.

On the one side are the vertebrates, including a long series of animals, from
the lowest fishes to man. All of them agree in their fundamental plan of struc-
ture and mode of development; the principal organs of any member of the series
may be surely identified in the others, and the general trend of evolution in the
phylum is clearly indicated. The fishes, for example, are the lowest members of
the series, and they are followed by the amphibia, reptiles, and mammals. Com-
parative anatomy shows the gradual evolution of form and structure in this
series as a whole, and its evidence is corroborated, in the main, by the embryonic
development of any member of the series, while the geologic, or historic record
harmonizes with, and confirms the testimony of the other two. In fact, the
vertebrates clearly constitute a common stock, a single phylum of the animal

Vv

vi INTRODUCTION.

kingdom. It has many side branches, it is true, but comparative anatomy,
embryology, and paleontology are in substantial agreement as to what kind of
animals and what organs and functions came first in time, what were the most
highly developed, and what was the general trend of evolution.

Even the simplest vertebrates, that stand at the beginning of this long
series, were very highly organized animals, for all the fundamental systems of
organs well known to us in man, such as the sensory, nervous, skeletal, circulatory,
and excretory, were there fully established and highly efficient. But there is little in
the structure or development of these organs that gives us any positive information
as to their previous history, condition, or origin, the very information essential
to a true understanding of their meaning.

On the other hand, when we look below the vertebrates for the main highway
of evolution, we are bewildered by the multiplicity of doubtful trails that appear
to have neither beginning nor end, that lead as readily in one direction as another.
Each invites us onward; but if followed, suspicion soon grows to conviction that
we have been deceived, that some other road is after all the right one.

The familiar cry, “This way,” “I have it,” that rose when an enthusiastic
pioneer struck the annelid, tunicate, balanoglossus, or some other promising trail,
would for a time rouse great expectations; but it always ended in disappointment,
and gradually created an attitude of indifference, and the feeling that the solution
of this great problem was forever beyond our reach. The conviction grew that
one or more large classes of animals that once constituted the living trunk of
the genealogical tree during Silurian, or pre-Silurian times, were entirely extinct,
and had left no traces whatever behind.

With the historic record of the most important period in the evolution of the
higher animals completely destroyed, the problem did indeed appear hopeless.
What was lacking in actual records was supplied by the speculative biologists,
and they did their work so well, and reiterated it so often, that it finally passed for
the truth, and its central idea, that the vertebrates had their origin in the
annelids, in some more or less roundabout way, became a dogma.

We then witnessed the interesting phenomenon, common enough but always
profitable to contemplate, as lightning that strikes near by, that those who would
not make the annelid theory a part of their creed, and who continued the search
in other directions for a substantial body of facts to build upon, were branded
as morphological heretics and speculators, or as the victims of a too vivid imagina-
tion; and it was always the most “orthodox” and persistent speculator that
waved the hottest brand.

But when the annelid dogma passed the period of productivity without off-
spring, even the orthodox biologists lost all hope of solving the real problem of the
origin of vertebrates, as well as many other large problems in invertebrate phy-
logeny, and turned their attention toward the Eldorado of cytology, heredity,
and experimental evolution, where ‘“‘results” were easy and promised to carry far.

Sterility has often turned devotion to contempt, and it is not suprising that the

INTRODUCTION. vii

biologist, whose theories were unfruitful, wrecked his wrath on the temple of
morphology and condemned its triune god to the consolation of his more credu-
lous colleagues; ‘Paleontology,’ he cried, “is mute, Comparative Anatomy
meaningless, and Embryology lies.”

But perhaps the fault was ours. We did not understand, because of igno-
rance and over confidence. It is not fifty years since the doctrine of evolution has
been generally recognized, and during the latter half of that period surprisingly
little persistent, or concerted work-has been done on the larger problems of
phylogeny, and there is but little to justify the too common attitude that the pos-
sibilities of morphology are exhausted. Much disconnected fragmentary work
has been done, but how little is known about the evolution of any one organ or
system of organs; how very few animals, if indeed there are any, whose structure,
development, and paleontological record are known with even approximate
fullness or accuracy. What large class of animals is not separated from its next
of kin by a gap too wide to be bridged by any known forms? Are these gaps due
merely to a hiatus in the available records, or in our knowledge of them, or are
they realities, representing periods of unusually rapid transformation due to
sudden changes in the methods, or conditions of growth? If the gaps between
the vertebrates and ostracoderms, and the ostracoderms and arachnids appear to
be wide ones, are they really any wider than those between the fishes and amphibia,
the reptiles and mammals, or the ccelenterates and arthropods? Are not the
evidences of genetic relationship of the same nature and value in one case as in
the other? Is not the paleontological record more precise and complete than we
have supposed? Will not embryology be less enigmatic under a new interpreta-
tion? Ifthe arachnids are indeed the next of kin to the ostracoderms, and through
them to the vertebrates, is that after all so incredible? With this gigantic column in
position, will not the remaining branches readily fall into their natural positions,
and the entire genealogical tree of the animal kingdom take on the convincing
symmetry and coherency of reality, of a living, growing organism that contains
the story of its own creation?

* * * * * * * * *

These are some of the problems bound up in the evolution of the vertebrates.
Clearly it is not merely a question of constructing a convenient and more or less
satisfactory genealogy of the animal kingdom. The whole philosophy of creative
evolution is involved in the answer. We must face these problems fairly, without
prejudice and without arrogance (surely the record of past achievements affords
no grounds for that attitude), and with a full recognition of their significance.
Facts are stubborn things that will not be ignored, that call out for recognition,
and for their proper location in a well ordered scheme, if not in one, then in some
other that is better.

The problem is of the utmost importance to the biologist, for the answer
should determine the location of several large classes of animals, now completely
isolated; it will enable us to reconstruct the broad outlines of the genealogical

vill INTRODUCTION.

tree of the animal kingdom where the main branches emerge from the darkness
of the pre-Cambrian period; it will furnish us the only means by which we can
hope to solve some of the most important problems in vertebrate morphology,
such as the meaning of vertebrate cephalogenesis, of concrescence, germ layers,
gastrulation, and the structure of the oldest fossil representatives of the vertebrate
series. The answer to such problems cannot be found till after we have dis-
covered the immediate ancestors of the vertebrates and the broad outlines of their
structure, for when the point of departure is determined, and only then, can we
determine which is the base and which is the summit of a series of changes, which
the primitive, which the derived; in short, the direction in which evolution is
moving.

The arachnid theory of the origin of vertebrates has made slow progress.
This is not surprising since it has had to contend against the fixed ideas of the
spécialist working in some narrow field of vertebrate or invertebrate morph-
ology, and who is unfamiliar with the multitude of facts and details, intricate in
themselves and in their bearings, upon which the arachnid theory rests. It has
also had to contend against the indifference of the newer school of biologists, who
look on morphology as an exhausted field, and who attach an exaggerated import-
ance to experimental, or statistical work, or to the minute structure of cells, or to
the analysis of protoplasm.

This is largely due to a common misconception of the real aim of the mor-
phologist; for it is evident that tracing the identity of structure under the disguise
of new forms is only the beginning of the morphologist’s work. His real problem
is to measure the rate of these changes, and to seek out the underlying causes.
Hence, a great morphological problem, such as the origin of vertebrates, is essen-
tially a problem in experimental evolution, an experiment performed on the largest
scale of any in the history of organic evolution. But here the problem presents
itself in a different form from the ordinary laboratory experiment. There the ex-
perimenter fixes the conditions, as nearly as possible, and then records and meas-
ures the events as they appear. Here the morphologist records and measures the
events, and from them tries to discover the conditions. I believe J have discovered
the main events in this experiment of Nature, and I have recorded it, in terms of
systematic zoology, in a genealogic tree of the great arthropod-vertebrate stock.
This discovery enables us to see clearly some of the factors that have brought
about the results. They are mainly internal factors, insignificant in themselves,
but acquiring such immense transforming power by persistent and prolonged -
action that it is unnecessary to invoke the agency of such factors as external
environment, natural selection, and heredity. At most, it seems to me, these
factors can account only for the superficial details of the essentially completed
body. Morphology teaches us that the foundations of anatomical structure are
automatically created by the processes of growth and organic readjustment, and
that they remain essentially unmoved by external conditons.

For almost a quarter of a century the problem of the evolution of the verte-

INTRODUCTION. ix

brates has been to me a stimulus and a guide. What appears to be an approxi-
mate solution of it has been tested and tested again, and elaborated—in itself the
severest test of alli—by many methods and from many points of view, for it has
seemed to me the one great problem that must be solved before the biologist can
approach the problems of creative evolution on a reasonably secure footing. To
gain this end, I have given the best I had; whether that is much or little is of no
consequence, except in so far as it is a guarantee of serious endeavor and of good
faith. That I am conscious of many difficulties and imperfections need not be
emphasized. I would gladly make them less. But to be overconscious of the
one, unsteadies the hand and draws the eye away from the open waters, and too
long a delay over the inevitable defects means to be surprised by the night, and
still unprepared.

CONTENTS.

PAGE
INTRODUCTION

HisTORICAL SKETCH v

List oF AUTHOR'S PAPERS . : xi

CHAPTER I. xiv

OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY : 1-26
I. Its scope and relation to other theories, 1. JI. Nature of the evidence to be pre-
sented, 3; A. cephalogenesis in arthropods, 3; B. embryology, 4; C. arachnid
cephalogenesis prophetic of the vertebrate head, 5; D. paleontology. III. The
process of cephalization in the arthropods, 7; A. The grouping and the increase in
number of metamers, 7; B. origin of the linear arrangement of unlike cephalic
functions, 8. IV. The subdivisions of the incipient vertebrate head in arachnids,
11; mesoderm, 12. 1. The procephalon, 12; insects, 13; arachnids, 13; sense
organs, 13; olfactory lobes, hemispheres and optic ganglia, 13; rostrum, 14; exter-
nal boundaries of the procephalon in the adult, 14. 2, 3. The dicephalon and the
mesocephalon, 15; endocranium, 16; oral arches, 16; taste buds, slime buds and
cranial ganglia, 17; segmental sense organs, 17; the diencephalon and the mesen-
cephalon, 18; the suprastomodzal commissure and the cerebellum, 19. 4. The
metencephalon, or vagus region, 19; vagus appendages, 19; vagus neuromeres, 19;
vagus nerves, 20. 5. The branchiocephalon, 20; mesoderm, 20; neuromeres, 21;
nerves, 21; the endocranium, 21; the mesoderm, 22; comparison, 23; the vascular
area and concrescence, 24; the new mouth, cephalic navel or haemostoma, 25; the
closure of the old mouth or neostoma, 26; conclusion, 26.

CHAPTER II.

OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY; CONTINUED :

I. Comparison of adult arthropods with adult vertebrates, 27. I. Orientation of
neural and hemal surfaces, 27. II. Comparison of adult arthropods and verte-
brates, 29; bunodes, 29. III. Comparison of arthropod and vertebrate embryos,
33; form controlling factors in the early stages, 34; the gustrula, ccelenterate, or
trochosphere stage, 34; transition from radiate to bilateral symmetry, 35; telopore,
35; germ wall, 35; concrescence of the germ wall, 35; the nervous system, 38; the
primary sense organs, 38; cornua, 38; vertebrate stagés, 38; the auditory pit, 39;
the heart, 39; cornua, 40; the oral arches and the hemostoma, 40; cranial flex-
ure, 40.

27-40

CHAPTER III.

EVOLUTION oF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS Se & ome “4TR§2
I. Meaning of the term brain, 41. II. The sternodceal nerves, 42. III. The
framework of the nervous system, 43. IV. The differentiation of the peripheral
nerves, 45; factors that modify the arrangement of peripheral nerves, 46; segrega-

Xl

xii CONTENTS.

PaGe
tion of nerve fibers, 46; elimination, 47; union, historic factor. WV. Neuromeres
and metamarism, 49. VI. Primitive sense buds, 50.

CHAPTER IV.

THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN 53-70
I. The prosencephalon, or forebrain, 53; the procephalic lobes, division into three
metameres; acilius, the hemispheres, optic ganglia and ocelli; arachnids, 54; the
olfactory lobes of the first segment; the hemispheres of the second; the forebrain
flexure. II. The diencephalon, 57; diencephalic flexure, cheliceral nerves and
ganglia, minute structure in limulus, 58; the large basal association neurones,
the large association neurones on the hemispheres, the cortex neurones; the cheli-
ceral lobes; the forebrain and cheliceral commissures; the stomodeal ganglia and
the supra-stomodzal commissure, 60; nerves to labrum; association with the coxal
taste organs; comparison with vertebrates, 60; summary, 64; III. The mesen-
cephalon, 65; the oral and hyoid arch neuromeres; mesenccele, 66; comparison of
thoracic neuromeres of arachnids with the midbrain neuromeres of vertebrates, 66.
IV. The metencephalon, or vagus neuromeres, and V. the branchiencephalon,
67; the vagus zone in arthropods, its special sensory characters; the branchience-
phalon, 69; the branchiencephalic neuromeres, number, segregation of their nerves
into branchial, cardiac, intestinal, hypobranchial, or branchiothoracic, 70.

CHAPTER V.

MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CorD OF CERACHNIDS 71-93

Methods, 71. I. The branchial neuromeres of limulus, 71; development, 71;
commissures, 72; peripheral nerves, 72; cell clusters, 73; nerve roots, 76; branchial
nerve roots, hemal roots, 77; commissures, 79; the neuropile centers, 79. II.
The cephalic neuromeres, 80; hemal commissures, 81; hemal roots, 81; cranial
ganglia, 81; motor neurones, 84; gustatory nerves and tracts, 84. III. Longitudi-
nal tracts, 85; longitudinal hemal tracts, 85; longitudinal neural tracts, 86; the
lateral or pedal ganglion tracts, 86; the general cutaneous tracts, 87; comparison
with vertebrates, 87. IV. Commissures; summary, 90. V. The neuroccelia, 92.
VI. The neuroglial 93,

CHAPTER VI.

PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA . . 94-109

I. Components of a neuromere, 94. II. Nerves of the diencephalon and mesen-
cephalon, 94; A. neural nerves, 94; the flabellum, 94; the cranial ganglia, 95; the
ganglia of the cord, 97; the hemal nerves, 97; the lateral line nerve of the chele-
ceral neuromere, 97. III. Nerves of the metencephalon, 98; limulus, neural nerves,
98; chilarial, opercular, hemal nerves; scorpion, 101; neural and hemal nerves.
longitudinal abdominal, 104; general cutaneous, ros; cardiac and hypobranchial
longitudinal abdominal, 104; general cutaneous, 1os§; cardiac and hyppobranchial
nerves. V. Relation of vagal and hypobranchial nerves in arachnids to those in
vertebrates, 107.

CHAPTER VII.

GENERAL AND SPECIAL CTUANEOUS SENSE ORGANS . = ot a ew we LTOe4
I. General cutaneous sense organs, 110; temperature organs, 110; free nerve ends,
t11, IJ. Special cutaneous sense organs, 111; the gustatory organs of limulus,

CONTENTS, xill

PAGE
III; reactions to stimuli, 112; structure, 113; the flabellum, 113; the branchial

warts, 115; the slime buds, 116; the auditory organ, 120; lateral line organs of
vertebrates; summary, 121.

CHAPTER VIII.

LarVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE 125-148
I. The different kinds of eyes in arthropods and vertebrates, 125; eyes of orthro-
pods, 125; larval ocelli, 125; frontal ocelli or stemmata, 125; parietal eye, lateral
eyes, cerebral eyes of vertebrates, 126; parietal eye, lateral eye, olfactory organ,
127. II. The eyes as segmental sense organs, 127; procephalic and thoracic sense
organs. JII. The larval ocelli of insects, 128; larval ocelli, stemmata. IV. The
parietal eye, 129; the parietal eye of the scorpion, 129; the parietal eye of limulus,
131; development; palial fold; epiphysis; anterior neuropore; change of position;
endoparietal and ectoparietal eye; nerves; retinal cells; the parietal eye of bran-
chipus, 136; the parietal eye of apus, 138; the parietal eye of vertebrates, 139;
petromyzon, 140; parietal eye vesicle, 140; ganglia, 142; asymmetry; comparison
with arthropods; the lenses of the parietal eye, 144; location of the placodes, 146;
minute structure, 140; summary, 147.

CHAPTER IX.

THE CompouNnD EYES OF ARTHROPODS AND THE LATERAL EYES OF VERTEBRATES 149-159

I. Compound eyes of arthropods, 149; A. serial location, 149; B. development,
150. IJ. Lateral eyes of vertebrates, 151; location, 151; origin of the chroid fis-
sure and the blind spot, 151; the retinal-cell pattern, 153; the retinal ganglion, 153;
the lens, 153; origin of the imperfections of the vertebrate eye, 154. III. The
optic ganglia, 154; location, 154; parietal eye ganglia, 155; lateral eye ganglia,
optic lobes, 155; minute structure in limulus, 155. IV. Comparison with verte-
brates, 157; summary and conclusion, 158.

CHAPTER X.

THE OLFACTORY ORGANS OF ARTHROPODS AND VERTEBRATES 160-173
I. The olfactory organ of limulus, 160; structure in adult, 160; gross structure;
minute structure; development of olfactory organ and nerves, 162; olfactory
placodes; lateral olfactory nerves; median olfactory nerve; summary, 163. II.
The olfactory lobes of arachnids, 164; development; scorpion and spiders; limulus;
development; structure. JII. The olfactory organs in phyllopods, frontal organs,
p. 165; branchipus, p. 166; apus, 167. IV. Comparison of olfactory organs of
vertebrates and arthropods, 168; 1. number of placodes, 168; 2. number of nerves,
169; 3. structure and termination of the nerves, 169; 4. origin of the olfactory
ganglia, 170; 5. position of placode cells, 170; 6. serial location of the placodes and
their migration, 170; 7. olfactory lobes, 171; 8. function, 171; summary and con-
clusion, 172.

CHAPTER XI.

FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN 174-194
Part I. Introduction, methods, 175; description of experiments, 176-186. Part
II. Summary of experimental and anatomical results, gustatory reflexes, structure
of gustatory apparatus, 186; the nerve-muscle chewing apparatus, 188; experi-

xly CONTENTS.

PAGE
mental results, the swallowing reflexes, 189; course of the nerve impulses in the
gustatory, chewing and swallowing reflexes, 189. II. The crossed thoracic
reflexes, 190. JII: The crossed and uncrossed abdomino-thoracic reflexes, 190.

IV. Locomotion, 191. V. Equilibrium, 191. VI. Respiration, 191; respiratory
reflexes, 192; comparison with vertebrates, 193. VII. The cerebral hem-
spheres, 194.

CHAPTER XII.

THe HEART + + « 195-209
J. Location of the heart, 195. II. The development of the heart, 195; compari-
son of vertebrate and arachnid heart. III. The circulation, 198; arachnids, 198;
comparison with vertebrates, 198, direction of blood currents, aortic arches, carotids,
circle of Wellis, aorte, cardinals, curvature of heart, split posterior end, reduction
of cardiac area, and moulding effect of blood stream on structure of heart walls.
IV. The cardiac nerves and ganglion, 200; the median cord or ganglion, 200;
the cardiac plexus, the lateral cardiacs, pericardials, segmental cardiacs. V. The
minute structure of the cardiac ganglion, 202; small multipolar or motor cells,
giant bipolar cells, small bipolar cells, motor terminals, 205; sensory terminals,
cardiac ganglia in vertebrates. WI. Experiments on the heart, 205. VII. Sum-
mary and conclusion, 208.
Ture NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SENSE ORGANS OF VERTEBRATES AND ARACHNIDS. GEN-
ERAL SUMMARY OF CHAPTERS I-XII 209-214

CHAPTER XIII.

THE Earty STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS 215-248
I. Primary causes of differential growth, 215. II. Morphological interpretation
of the early stages, 219. III. Embryology of limulus, 222; 1. cleavage, 223; com-
parison with vertebrates, 223; 2. the germ disc or primitive cumulus, 224; 3. for-
mation of metameres, 225; 4. the gastrula, 227; 5. the germ wall, 228; 6. the meso-
derm, 230; the sources and kinds of mesoderm: (a) procephalic, (b) postoral, (1)
axial cord, (2) mesoblastic somites, (3) lateral plates; the fibre cells, 232, give rise
to: (a) inter-tergal, branchial section of branchio-thoracic, and numerous scat-
tered, muscles; (b) to semi-amceboid wandering cells which persist in adult stages;
Vascular area, 236; pellucid area. IV. The cephalic navel, dorsal organ, or neos-
toma, 238. V. Concrescence and the caudal navel or blastopore, 243.

CHAPTER NIV.

THE OLp MovutTH AND THE New; Locomoror AND RESPIRATORY APPENDAGES . 249-273
The salient features of the mouth and appendages in arthropods and vertebrates,
249; the argument, 250. I. The closing of the old mouth, 251. II. The new
mouth, 253. JII. The jaws or oral arches, 255; development of the oral arches
in the frog, 257; conclusion, 260. IV. The gill arches and the external gills, 26r.
V. The gill sacs, the thyroid and the thymus, 263. VI. The gut pouches, 266.
VI. The locomotor appendages, 263; conclusion, 271.

CHAPTER XV.

VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES j 274-288
Problem stated. I. Invaginated appendages, 275. II. Asymmetry, 276, III.
Degeneration, 277; A. median fusion and antero-posterior degeneration, 277;

CONTENTS.

B. hour-glass embryos, 279; C. acephalic and acaudal embryos, 280; D. final
stages of degeneration, 281; IV. Double embryos, 281. V. Triple embryos,
284. VI. Summary and conclusion, 287.

CHAPTER XVI.

Tue DERMAL SKELETON .
The five kinds of skeletal sich in arthropods and vertebrates, 289. I. The
dermal skeleton of vertebrates, 289; the minute structure of the dermal bones in
the ostracoderms, 290; tremataspis, 290; pteraspis, 293; ateleaspis, 295. II.
Dermal skeleton of limulus, 296; minute structure, 297. III. Summary and com-
parison, 302.

CHAPTER XVII.

THE ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CaRTILAGES .
I. The endoskeleton of arachnids, 306. II. The neural arches, aot, Ill. The
branchial cartilages, 307; development of branchial cartilages in limulus, 308;
minute structure, 309. IV. The endocranium, 312; apus, 312; mygale, 313; lim-
ulus, 314; scorpion, 317; telyphonus, 319. V. Summary and comparison, 319.

CHAPTER XVIII.

Tse MIDDLE CorD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD
I. The middle cord of insects, 324; the lemmatochord of lepidoptera, 326. II.
The middle cord of the scorpion; A. neural sinus, merochord and bothroidal cord
of the adult, 328; B. development of the lemmatochord, 329; merochord, 330;
C. development of the neural sinus, neuroglia and canalis centralis, 331. III.
The middle cord of limulus, 334. IV. Summary and comparison, 335.

CHAPTER NIX.

THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS
Nature of the problem. I. The marine arachnids and their origin, 338. II.
The ostracoderms, 341; historical review, 342.

CHAPTER XX.

THE OSTRACODERMS .

Subdivisions of the body, 349; the cephalic appendages, 350; jaws, 350; skeleton,
351; trend of development of the exoskeleton, 352; the eyes, 355; olfactory organ,
356; auditory organ, 356; cutaneous sense organs, 356. I. Aspidacephali, 358;
cephalospide, 358; trematospide, 359; exoskeleton, oral region, lateral eyes,
marginal and postorbital openings, lateral line organs, appendages, ateleaspide,
363. II. The anaspida, 364; ccelolepide, birkeniide. III. The pteraspida, 364;
pterospide, psamostede. IV. Antiacha, 367; exoskeleton, 367; atrial frill, 371;
gills, 371; viscera, 372; jaws, 373; hyoid arches, 375; mouth, 375; eyes, olfactory
organs, sensory grooves, 376; cephalic appendages, 376; preservation, 377; loco-
motion, 379; food, 379.

CHAPTER XXI.

THe VERTEBRATES.
I. The cyclostomata, 383. II. The elasmobranchii and holocephali, 384. III.
The arthrodira, teleostomii dipnoi and amphibia, 386.

XV

Pace

289-305

306-322

323-336

337-347

348-380

381-392

xvi CONTENTS.

PART II. THE ACRANIATA.

CHAPTER XXII.

Pace
THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES eat. <s f 393-407
Statement of the problem, 393. I. The craniates, 395. II. The acraniates, 396;
metamerism, 398; appendages, nervous system, 399; degeneration, attachment,
mantle, 400; skeleton, heart and circulation, 401; sexual organs, development, 401;
A. molluscs and annelids, 403; trochosphere, gastrula, blastopore; B. craniates,
403; modification of the gastrula, telopore, concrescence; C. acraniates, 405; mes-
entoccel, telopore, mouth, 406; the naupula, ccelom, 407.
CHAPTER XXIII,
THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES, AND ECHINODERMS 408-430

I. The cirripeds, 408; the nauplius and the naupula, the metamorphosis, 410;
appendages, alimentary canal, 411; coelom, excretory organs, 412; sexual organs,
degeneration, 413; the old mouth and the new. II. The tunicates, 415; meta-
morphosis, heart and vascular system, 417; eyes, 418; the old mouth and the new,
mantle, 419; comparison with cirripeds, summary, 420. III. The echinoderms,
421; larva, 422; ciliated band, 423; cephalic appendages, 424; attachments, de-
velopment, 425; teloccel, mesoderm and ccelom, 426; thoracic appendages, 427;
excretory organs, disc, vertebrate, 428; asymmetry, summary, 430.

CHAPTER XXIV,

THe ENTEROPNEUSTA, PLEROBRANCHIA, POLYZOA-BRACHIOPODA PHORONIDA AND
CHALTOGNATHA ae 431-453
IV. The enteropneusta and echinoderms, 431; the enteropneusta and the arthro-
pods, 432; structure and development, 433; cleavage, 433; gastrula and teloccele,
433; mesoderm and ccelom, 434; metamorphosis, 435; cephalic cecum, 435;
late larval and adult stages, 435; endocranium, 436; muscles, 437; ccelom, 437;
nervous system, 437. V. The pterobranchia, 439. VI. The polyzoa, 440; ento-
procta, 441; conclusion, 443; ectoprocta, 443. VII. The brachiopoda, 445.
VIII. The, phoronida, 446; fusiform cells, 447. IX. The chetognatha, 448; de-
velopment, 448; adult, 449; integument, 449; excretory organs, 449; trunk, 450;
head, 450; endocranium, 450; nervous system, 450; cephalic sense organs, 452;
lateral eyes, 452; parietal eye, 452; olfactory organ, 452; ‘conclusion, 453-

CHAPTER XXV.,

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 454-472

I. The evolution of a creative environment, 454. II. Crises in organic evolution,
456; A. the evolution of metamerism and bilateral symmetry, 457; B. asymmetry
as a creative factor, 458; C. chiten and the exoskeleton as creative factors, 430;
D. the increasing volume of the yolk sphere as a creative factor, 461; E. the increas-
ing volume of the brain as a creative factor, 461; F. the creation of a new environ-
ment for the eyes, 462; the significance of a natural system of classification, 463;
the various aspects of evolution, 468.

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING . ; . 473

INDEX . . ae ; ‘ 483

HISTORICAL SKETCH.

The resemblance between vertebrates and arthropods first attracted my
attention in 1884. In my paper on the development of the phryganids, it was
stated, page 594, that a wonderful analogy, if not homology, exists between the
structure and mode of growth of the medullary plate, the neural and gastrular in-
vaginations, and the neurenteric canal of insects and the corresponding structures
in vertebrates.

Three years later, a resemblance between the minute structure of the
compound eyes of arthropods and the retina of vertebrates was recognized.

In 1888, it was shown that the invagination of the procephalic lobes, supposed
by writers of that period to give rise to a two-layered compound eye, in reality
gave rise to the optic ganglion only, while the eye itself consisted of a single layer.
Further study of the developing brain and eyes of Acilius, Buthus, and Limulus,
showed that in many arthropods the procephalic lobes underwent a complex
process of invagination, accompanied by the overgrowth of a neural crest, or
palial fold, the result being the formation of a vesicular forebrain, and the transfer
of the ocelli, located on the outer margin of the lobes, to the end of a tubular or
epiphysial outgrowth of the membranous roof of the forebrain vesicle.

Here were revealed, for the first time, all the steps in the transformation
of an invertebrate type of eye into the type of eye so characteristic of ver-
tebrates. This apparently simple fact was in reality the result of very complex
conditions, and it seemed incredible that they could be duplicated except in
animals belonging to the same stock.

These discoveries, therefore, appeared so profoundly significant that I deter-
mined to follow the clue to the end, to see whether further analysis of the eyes, the
brain, and other systems of organs would not confirm the obvious conclusion to be
drawn from them. The results proved to be so surprisingly in accord with them,
that in the following year, 1889, a definite theory was formulated, and a prelim-
inary sketch, or outline, of it was published under the title ““On the Origin of
Vertebrates from Arachnids.”’

This theory has formed the basis of all my subsequent work, and as far as it
went, is practically the same as the one presented here. In that paper it was
maintained that the vertebrates are descended from the arachnid division of the
arthropods, in which were included the typical arachnids, the trilobites, and
merostomes. The ostracoderms were regarded as a separate class, uniting
the arachnids with the true vertebrates. Limulus and the scorpion were the
types most carefully studied, because they were the nearest and most available

xvii

xviil HISTORICAL SKETCH.

living representatives of the now extinct merostomes, or giant sea scorpions, that
were regarded as the arachnids standing nearest to the ostracoderms.

Other evidence and conclusions were as follows: 1. In the arachnids a forebrain
vesicle is formed by the same process of marginal overgrowth as in the vertebrates.
From the floor of the vesicle arise the forebrain and optic ganglia; from the
membranous roof, a tubular outgrowth is formed that contains a parietal, or pineal
eye, similar in structure, mode of origin, and innervation to the pineal eye of
vertebrates. 2. The kidney-shaped compound eye of arachnids has been trans-
ferred to the walls of the cerebral vesicle in vertebrates, giving rise to the retina,
which still shows traces of ommatidia in the arrangement of the rod-and-cone
cells. Its original shape is temporarily retained in vertebrates, but gives rise
ultimately, by adaptive exaggeration, to the choroid fissure. 3. The arachnids
have a cartilaginous endocranium similar in shape and location to the primordial
cranium of vertebrates. 4. They have an axial, subneural rod comparable with
the notochord. 5. In arachnids, the brain contains approximately the same num-
ber of neuromeres as in vertebrates. It is also divided into similar regions, each
one having a similar number of neuromeres, a similar distribution of nerves, and a
similar relation to cranial ganglia and sense organs, to those in vertebrates. 6.
The segmental sense organs (median and lateral eyes, olfactory and auditory
organs) are comparable with those in vertebrates. The coxal sense organs are
associated with special sensory nerves and ganglia, comparable with the cranial
dorsal-root nerves and ganglia (suprabranchial sense organs) of vertebrates.
7. The basal arches of the appendages are comparable with the oral and branchial
visceral arches in vertebrates. 8. The tendency toward concentration of neuro-
meres has narrowed the passage way for the stomodeum and modified the mode of
life in the arachnids. This ultimately led to its permanent closure, the infundi-
bulum and adjacent nerve tissues in vertebrates representing the remnants of
the old stomodzum with its nerves and ganglia. 10. The progressive degeneration
of hemal thoracic muscles, the fusion of thoracic metameres, the position of the
oral, or neural surface, in swimming and crawling, were identified with corre-
sponding conditions in vertebrates. 311. The eye muscles of vertebrates arose
from a special group of hemo-neural muscles belonging probably to the first
two or three thoracic segments. 12. The process of gastrulation in vertebrates
and arachnids is confined to the procephalic lobes, in the place where at a later
period the primitive stomodeum appears. The so-called “ gastrulation” of verte-
brates and arachnids is an entirely different and independent process, that is, the
process of adding by apical or teloblastic growth a segmented, bilaterally sym-
metrical body to a primitive radially symmetrical head. 13. The arachnids
resemble the vertebrates in more general ways, as in the minute structure of
cartilage, muscle, nerves, digestive, and sexual organs.

In the following paper, ’93, the structure of the forebrain of Limulus, with its
lobes and cavities was compared in detail with the brain of vertebrates. The
coxal sense organs were described and shown to be gustatory organs comparable

HISTORICAL SKETCH. xix

with the suprabranchial organs of vertebrates. The remarkable structure of the
olfactory organs in Limulus was also described for the first time.

In 1894 it was shown that the exoskeleton consisted of a complicated, and
for an invertebrate, a very remarkable system of chitenous trabecule resembling
a primitive form of dermal bone.

In 1896 was published a paper on the “Variations in the Development of
Limulus.’ It was undertaken in the hope that it might throw some light on the
normal development, or give some indications of the kind of variations that have
led to the higher types.

In 1899 and ’oo, in cooperation with Mr. Redenbaugh and Miss Hazen, a de-
scription of the peripheral nervous system, endocranium, and coxal glands was
published. The work was begun with the purpose of furnishing a detailed
account of the various systems of organs in arachnids as a basis for further com-
parisons with vertebrates.

In 1901 advantage was taken of a six months leave of absence from college
duties to study the principal collections of ostracoderms in European museums.
It was rarely possible to make use of such collections for anything more than a
superficial examination. An effort was therefore made to obtain material that
could be sectioned, or used in any manner that seemed desirable, in order to get
at the anatomical structure. A valuable collection of Tremataspis and Thy-
estes was obtained in the island of Oesel in the Baltic Sea, and a few cephalaspids
and pteraspids were obtained by gift and purchase in England. In the next four
or five years an effort was made to obtain ostracoderms in the vicinity of Dal-
housie, N. B., Canada, at first with little success. Finally, I obtained a very large
number of specimens in a beautiful state of preservation, from which it was
possible to work out the anatomy in great detail. The structure of the eyes, jaws,
and internal organs afforded a striking confirmation of our conclusion that the
ostracoderms form a new class of animals standing between the vertebrates and
arachnids.

In 1888, ’89, and ’go, Gaskell published his first papers on the Origin of the
Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. The basis of his theory was that “‘the
central nervous system of a crustacean ancestor had grown round and enclosed
the alimentary canal.” “The ventricles of the brain were the old cephalic stomach
and the canalis centralis of the spinal cord, the long straight intestine which led
originally to the anus.” The vertebrate develops a new heart, alimentary canal,
and other organs to take the place of those enclosed in the central nervous system.

In its conception and mode of analysis of the conditions in the vertebrates and
arthropods, this theory is entirely different from, and wholly irreconcilable with my
own. In my judgment, the foundations on which it is built are totally wrong.
The fundamental error, which is inextricably interwoven in all his conclusions,
making a detailed criticism of them unnecessary, is the assumption that the neural
surface of an arthropod is the same as the hemal surface of a vertebrate. In this
confusion of opposite surfaces, which is like starting on a voyage of discovery with

xX

KIISTORICAL SKETCH.

the notion that north_issouth, and east is west, the nerve cords are transferred
from one side of the body to the other, turning them literally upside down and
inside out, annihilating the most fundamental systems of organs, such as the
heart and entire alimentary canal, and necessitating the creation “de novo” of
whole systems of organs to take their place. In this process the axes of growth
and differentiation are reversed, or ignored, and no attempt is made to reconcile
these assumptions with the actual conditions that are so familiar in the embryonic
development of both vertebrates and arthropods.

List oF

1884.
1886.
1887.
1887.

1888.

1888.
1890.

1893.

1894.
1896.

1896.
1899.
1899.

1899.

Ig00

IQOL.
1go2.
1903.
1903.
1903.

1903.
1904.

THE AUTHOR’S PAPERS CONCERNING THE EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATES

The Development of Phryganids with a preliminary note on the development of
Blatta Germanica. Quart. J. M. Sc., Vol. XXIV, N.S.

Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods. Mitth. aus. d. Zool. Stat. zu. Neapel. Vol. VI.
Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods. Journ. Morphol. Vol. I, April 11.

Studies on the Eyes of Arthropods. I. Development of the Eyes of Vespa,
with Observations on the Ocelli of some Insects. Journ. of Morphol., Vol. I,
April 11.

Studies on the Eyes of Arthropods. II. Eyes of Acilius. Journ. of Morphol.,
Vol. II.

Segmental Sense Organs of Arthropods. Journ. of Morphol., Vol. II.

On the Origin of Vertebrates from Arachnids. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc.,
Vol. XXXI, Part 3.

On the Morphology and Physiology of the Brain and Sense Organs of Limulus.
Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc., Vol. XXXV, No. 137.

On Structures Resembling Dermal Bones in Limulus. Anat. Anz., Bd. 9, No. 14.
Variations in the Development of Limulus Polyphemus. Journ. of Morphol.,
Vol. XII, No. 1.

The Visual Centres of Arthropods and Vertebrates. Morph. Soc. Sc., Vol. V,
Pp. 431.

Patten Wm., and Redenbaugh, W. A. The Endocranium of Limulus, Apus,
and Mygale. Journ. Morphol., Vol. XVI, No. 1.

Patten, Wm., and Redenbaugh, W. A. The Nervous System of Limulus
Polyphemus. Ibid.

Gaskell’s Theory of the Origin of Vertebrates. Am. Naturalist, Vol. XNXIII,
April, pp. 360-9.

Patten, Wm., and Hazen, A. P. The Development of the Coxal Gland,
Branchial Cartilages, and Genital Ducts of Limulus. Journ. Morphol., Vol. XVI,
No. 3.

On the Origin of Vertebrates, with Special Reference to the Ostracoderms.
Address before the V. International Congress of Zoologists, Berlin.

On the Structure and Classification of the Tremataspide. Amer. Nat., Vol.
XXXVI, No. 425.

On the Structure and Classification of the Tremataspide. Mem. Acad. Imp.
Sci. St. Pétersbourg, Vol. XIII, No. 5.

On the Appendages of Tremataspis. Amer. Nat., Vol. XXXVII, No. 436.

The Structure of the Ostracoderms. Science, Vol. XVII, No. 430.

On the Structure of the Pteraspide and Cephalaspide. Am. Nat.

New Facts Concerning Bothriolepis. Biol. Bul., Vol. VII., July.

1904.

1907.

1907.

1907.

HISTORICAL SKETCH. Xxl

The Structure of Bothriolepis, with Exhibition of Specimens of Devonian Fishes
of Canada. Read before the Am. Soc. of Zoologists, Phila.

On the Origin of Vertebrates. I. The Conditions Controlling the External
Morphology of Primitive Vertebrates. Lantern Slides. Read before Section
VII, General Zool, VII. International Zool. Congress, Boston, August.

On the Origin of Vertebrates. II. The Interpretation of the Structure of Echino-
derms, Ascidians, Balanoglossus, and Cephalodiscus. Lantern Slides. Ibid.
International Congress, Boston, Mercator Projections of Vertebrate and Arachnid.
Embryos.

Exhibits. A. Collection of Bothriolepis from the Devonian rocks of New
Brunswick.

B. Fifty Models Illustrating the Structure and Embryology of Primitive Verte-
brates and Related Forms. Reviewed in Amer. Nat., Vol. XLI, No. 490.

THE
EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATES
AND THEIR KIN.

CHAPTER I.

OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

In the two following chapters we shall present a brief outline of the arachnid
theory, showing the broad foundations upon which it rests and the relation of
the principal organs in the arachnids to those in the vertebrates.

I. Irs SCOPE AND RELATION TO OTHER THEORIES.

The arachnid theory, like every other large problem in descent, should be
based on comparative physiology, anatomy, embryology, and paleontology,
and should be constructed in accordance with the established principles of these
sciences. This particular theory has the additional task of reconciling, eliminating,
or absorbing the claims of strongly entrenched rival theories, some of which con-
tain certain elements of truth, It is important, therefore, to at once determine
which supplies the greatest volume of evidence; which draws its evidence from
the widest fields; which can eliminate the others, or include the others within
itself.

We shall show that in these respects the arachnid theory stands in a class
by itself, for it is the only one that is securely built on the natural science trinity
of structure, function, and historic sequence. It not only has its own distinctive
merits upon which it claims recognition, but it is the only theory that can either

‘eliminate the others, or incorporate them within itself, where they become rein-
forced and revitalized.

The essential features of the annelid theory, for example, are included in
the arachnid theory, because both arachnids and annelids agree in the funda-
mental nature of their metameric structure. But when standing alone, the anne-
lid theory ceases to be of value as a working hypothesis, or as a touchstone to
solve the problems of vertebrate morphology, because we find no traces in the
annelids of those illuminating modifications of metamerism so characteristic of
the arachnids, and that afford us the required data for filling in, and explaining,
the enormous gap between the unspecialized metameres of an annelid and the
groups of highly specialized metameres in the head of a vertebrate. The annelid

I

2 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

theory, therefore, in the form in which it is generally understood, could be in-
corporated into the arthropod theory, but it is evident that the conditions could
not be reversed, for no resemblance of annelids to vertebrates could either elimi-
nate, or account for, the resemblance of arthropods to vertebrates.

The tunicate, echinoderm, balanoglossus, amphioxus, etc., theories have
similar inherent weaknesses, indicating that they must be subordinated to
some larger view. The baffling resemblances between the embryonic stages of
these forms and vertebrates do not help us to explain vertebrate cephalogenesis,
or to account for the origin of the most characteristic vertebrate structures; and
so long as their own origin is unknown, and they have no fixed location in a
general system of classification, they can throw no light on the origin of verte-
brates, or on the still broader problems of the origin and inter-relations of the
other great subdivisions of the animal kingdom.

All this is changed, however, as soon as we recognize that the echinoderms
tunicates, balanoglossus, and cephalodiscus are degenerate offshoots of a common
arthropod-vertebrate stock. In the light of this interpretation, the arachnid
theory not only recognizes and explains the resemblance of the echinoderms,
tunicates, and other acraniates to the vertebrates, but it fixes approximately
their position in the animal kingdom, and elucidates the salient features of their
morphology. It supplies, in the evolution of the arthropod cephalothorax, the
key to the analysis of the vertebrate head. It unites the apex of the arthropod
stock with the base of the vertebrate stock, and welds the entire series of seg-
mented animals into one homogeneous group. It shows that the great verte-
brate-ostracoderm-arthropod phylum forms the main trunk of the genealogical
tree of the animal kingdom; that, emerging from unsegmented, ccelenterate-like
animals, as though driven by some mysterious internal power, moves with aston-
ishing precision, through broad, predetermined channels—from which neither
habit, nor environment, nor heredity, can cause it to diverge—toward its goal.
And finally it lays before us in their historic order the critical events of these age-
long periods, the succession of structural and functional changes that have fol-
lowed them, and that have in turn given rise to still other changes of form and
new conditions of growth. It thus reveals to us, as only the true science of mor-
phology can reveal, the important agents that have directed the course of evolution,
and that have determined the organic forms, or shapes, in which it is expressed.

The arachnid theory thus not only unites and harmonizes these apparently
conflicting views as no other interpretation can, but it will, in my judgment, go
a long way toward restoring morphology to its former dominant position as the
expounder and prophet of the biological sciences. Morphology reduced to a
barnyard science, without its vast resources in comparative anatomy, its per-
spective in geological time, and its world-wide laboratory of Nature, is robbed of
its chief glory and power.

One naturally looks on the arthropods as the probable ancestors of the
vertebrates, because they are the most highly organized of segmented invertebrates

NATURE OF THE EVIDENCE. 3

and because the histological structure of their muscles, nerves, sense organs,
cartilages, etc., closely resembles that of the vertebrates. This view was, there-
fore, the first to be entertained by the older anatomists (Leydig and Dohrn);
but in more recent years it has not been regarded with favor.

So far as I have been able to determine, most zoologists of to-day. who make
any attempt to justify their deep rooted prejudice against the arthropod theory,
base their objections on the a priori ground that the arthropods, being highly
specialized animals, cannot have given rise to the vertebrates, because the verte-
brates must have come from some generalized type. This objection clearly has
but little weight, for the general application of such a law would exclude the
possibility of any evolution. Every animal is a specialized one when compared
with its ancestors, and at the same time a generalized one when compared with
its descendants. Even the most primitive vertebrate is a highly specialized
animal, and its immediate ancestors were also highly specialized. It is clear,
therefore, that in order to solve our problem we must discover not some gener-
alized ancestor but a specialized one, and the only evidence of value in deter-
mining whether we have found the right one or not, is the degree to which its
particular kind of specialization agrees with that of a vertebrate.

II. NATURE OF THE EVIDENCE TO BE PRESENTED.

Our problem then is a perfectly simple one in principle, although it is one
that involves an enormous amount of detail in its application. We have merely
to strip off the superficial disguise of our hypothetical arachnid ancestors and see
whether either their underlying structure, their mode of growth, the general
direction and historic sequence of their evolution, does or does not harmonize
with the assumption that they are the ancestors of the vertebrates. We venture
to state at the outset, that in our judgment they do harmonize with this assump-
tion, and so fully and in such detail as to leave no other conclusion open than that
the vertebrates arose from arachnid-like arthropods.

A. Cephalogenesis in Arthropods.—We shall show, with the aid of com-
parative anatomy, that the process of cephalizing the anterior part of the body,
that is, the transformation of a large number of independent metameres into a
compact, organized group of unlike structures that may be called a “‘head,’’ is
the dominant process in the evolution of arthropods, and that this process has
already definitely established in the higher forms the more characteristic features
of the vertebrate head. The process is initiated in primitive arthropods either

‘by the division of the anterior part of the body into regions, or by the addition
from time to time of distinct groups of like metameres, or tagmata. The succes-
sive appearance of new groups of metameres at the tail end of the body marks
distinct epochs in the evolution of the arthropods, and they constitute the under-
lying basis for the characteristic subdivision of the body into pre-oral, oral, tho-
racic, vagus, abdominal, and caudal regions. We shall call them the procephalon,

4 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

dicephalon, mesocephalon, metacephalon, and branchiocephalon. Each region
usually consists of a certain number of metameres, modified, or specialized, in a
very constant and definite manner in respect to its sense organs, nerves, and other
characters. In the higher arachnids they unite in various ways to form larger
aggregates, such as the cephalo-thoracic-branchial region. In the vertebrates
they have become still more compactly united to form the head, the subdivisions
of which still consist, as nearly as may be determined, of the same number of
metameres, modified in the same characteristic manner as the corresponding
subdivisions of the arthropod trunk and cephalothorax. (Figs. 1, 3 and 5.)

IN.----- Pro.C-~~-
acu DIE a.

gust.o. f..
die.enc. f--_ sd ey

Fic, 1.—Plan of a marine arachnid, based in part on Limulus. Designed to show the principal body regions
and their characteristic organs. A, Neural, or oral surface; B, hemal, or cardiac surface.

B. Embryology.—We shall show that arachnid and vertebrate embryos,
from the very beginning of their development, are fundamentally alike in structure
and mode of growth, and that this likeness is continued through successive,
parallel stages, up to a point where the arachnid stages cease; then the vertebrate
embryo, entering on its particular phases of development, carries them to com-
pletion. We shall show that the similarity between them consists: a. in the
origin of the germ layers; b. in the general form and segmentation of the neural
plate, its flexures, mode of enclosure, and the location of its principal parts; c.

CEPHALOGENESIS. 5

in the serial location and subsequent migrations of the primary cephalic sense
organs (median and lateral eyes, olfactory, and auditory organs); d. in the
degree of development of the cephalic mesoblast, and in the direction and extent
of its growth in the several regions; e. in the development of the heart; f. inthe
concrescence of the so-called “lips of the blastopore,” and in the growth of the
margins of the embryonic area (“‘ germ wall”’); g. in the formation of the head fold.
» (. Arachnid Cephalogenesis Prophetic of the Vertebrate Head.—We
shall show that the continuation, or the exaggeration, of the processes already
initiated in the arachnids inevitably leads to the establishment of the conditions
now seen in the vertebrates. For example: a. The further withdrawal of the

Fic. 2.—Semi-schematic cross-sections of a marine arachnid, showing location of principal organs, A, abdominal
region; B, branchial region; C, mesocephalic, or thoracic region.

principal alimentary and urogenital organs of the arachnids into the postcephalic
regions, would produce the conditionin vertebrates. 6. The continued enlarge-
ment and closer union of the thoracic neuromeres, and their more precocious
development during embryonic periods, aided possibly by the further overgrowth
of the labrum and optic ganglia, would lead to a further narrowing, and over-
growth of the passage for the esophagus, and ultimately to the permanent closure
-of the old mouth, as in vertebrates. -c. The continued increase in the size of the
yolk sphere, the absence of mesodermic structures on the hemal side of the tho-

6 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

racic and cephalic region, and the increasingly precocious development of the fore-
brain, would inevitably lead to the formation of a more pronounced head fold,
with a disproportionately shortened or diminished hemal surface, and would force
the bases of the more anterior oral appendages forward and hemally till they
meet on the opposite side of the head, thus giving rise to the premaxillary, maxillary,
and mandibular arches of the vertebrate head. d. This shortening of the ante-
rior hemal surface of the head inevitably draws the heart, with its neighboring
muscles and nerves derived from the vagal and branchial segments, farther for-
ward into the head region, thus producing that remarkable forward dis-
location of the heart, hypobranchial muscles and nerves so familiar in vertebrates.
(Figs. 17, 19, 33, 77.) ¢. Finally the readjustment of the whole head, in response
to these changes, leads to that new condition of architectural stability that marks
the true vertebrates.

The preliminary stages that lead up to these readjustments were, no doubt,
gradual and more or less tentative, for they did not in themselves create sufficiently
altered conditions to upset the balance of organic power. But the later stages
of the readjustment, especially the final stages in the transfer of the oral arches to
the hemal side, appear to have been rapidly accelerated for a period and then
checked by their approaching reunion on the hemal side of the head and by the
creation there of a new condition of organic stability.

The closing of the old mouth, the formation of a new one, the transfer of the
oral arches to the hemal side, and the appearance of true gill clefts must have
taken place during the embryonic, or larval period, the increasing volume of the
yolk sphere making such a cataclysmic metamorphosis possible. Hence it is
probable that the transition from the arthropod to the vertebrate type will never
be completely bridged by the discovery of new animals. The gap between the
two classes is a real one, representing a comparatively short period of rapid trans-
formation from the old condition in the arthropods to a new, approximately
stable condition in the vertebrates.

D. Paleontology.—Nevertheless, we shall show that the wide gulf which now
separates the arachnids and vertebrates, in some important respects, was bridged
in early paleozoic times by a large and varied class of animals known as the
ostracoderms. ‘They constitute the only great class of animals that have flour-
ished for a comparatively short period and then become totally extinct; a
fact that in itself testifies to the unstable, transitory character of their anatomical
structure.

Heretofore it has been assumed that the ostracoderms were highly specialized
vertebrates, in spite of the fact that they possessed a very simple and primitive
structure, and were the first vertebrate-like animals to appear on the geological
horizon. They were contemporaneous with the highest and most dominant
type of arthropods then in existence, the marine arachnids, or sea scorpions, of
the Silurian period. There is a striking resemblance between these early verte-
brates and the contemporaneous arachnids, not only in their form and general

PALEONTOLOGY. 7

appearance, but in the minute structure of their exoskeleton, the character of
their appendages, the arrangement of their median ocelli, and in the structure
of their jaws. (Figs. 232 to 265.) For a long time the ostracoderms were
supposed to be jawless fishes, but a special investigation of this point was made
and it was demonstrated that Bothriolepis, the best known member of the class,
possesses well developed maxille and mandibles, quite unlike those of typical
vertebrates, but precisely like those demanded by the arachnid theory.

Thus, in the light of the arachnid theory, these ancient and remarkable
animals, that have been repeatedly mistaken for arthropods and for vertebrates,
but which are neither wholly; which have withstood the keen scrutiny of Agassiz,
Huxley, Ray Lankester, and Smith Woodward, take on a new meaning. We can
now clearly see that they belong neither to the vertebrates nor to the invertebrates,
but form a class by themselves, intermediate between the two; presenting on the
one hand, in their appendages, jaws, eyes, skeleton and gills, affinities with the
marine arachnids, and on the other, in their tail, dermal skeleton, and dorsal fins,
affinities with true vertebrates.

Ill. Tuer Process oF CEPHALIZATION IN THE ARTHROPODS.

If we trace the evolution of cephalization in the arthropods and analyze the
causes that have brought it about, we shall see that it reaches its highest expression
in the arachnids and that it was brought about by the same kind of changes that
have taken place in the vertebrates.

* * * * * *K * * ok

A. The Grouping and the Increase in Number of Metameres.—The domi-
nant process in the evolution of the arthropods is the spasmodic generation of new
groups of terminal metameres, the gradual specialization of each group, and its
more intimate union with the older, more anterior members of the series. The in-
crease in the total number of metameres, from the first three that are characteristic
of the nauplius, to the seven found in the ostracods, eleven in the cladocera, and
the twenty-one or -two so commonly present in the higher forms, goes hand and
hand with the specialization and union of the more anterior groups into an increas-
ingly complex organic unit that in the vertebrate sense may be properly called a
“head.”

While this process, in a variable degree, occurs in all arthropods, it is only
in the arachnids that it takes place in the particular manner that is characteristic
of vertebrates. In the more typical representatives of that class, the first fifteen
or sixteen metameres are divided into unlike groups that have a similarsequence,
consist of a similar number of metameres, and present a similar morphological
and physiological specialization of organs to that seen in the corresponding regions
of the vertebrate head.

It is evident, therefore, that the ancestral history of the vertebrate head is con-
tained in the first fifteen or sixteen arachnid metameres, and that in the arachnids

38 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

we may study this process of cephalization in detail. At one end of the body we
may observe the birth of new, independent metameres, and at the other the gradual

PrC Die. Ms ¢C Mt. Br.C.

PrG Dic. Msc

Mt.C. Br

Fic. 3.—Diagrams showing the five characteristic body regions of arthropods, and their progressive concen-
tration to form the head of a vertebrate. The principal points illustrated are: u, The early location of the prin-
cipal functions; 6, the concentration of the cardiomeres in the branchial region; c, the enlargement and concentra-
tion of the anterior cephalic neuromeres; d, the change in position of the optic ganglia and oral arches; ¢, the
closure of the old mouth and the formation of the new one; f, the transfer of locomotor organs from the meso-
cephalon to the postbranchial metameres, A and B, Insect; C, arachnid; D, vertebrate.

decline of metamerism, and the incorporation of the old metameres, as specialized
subordinate parts, into a new and more highly organized unit.

* ok * * * k * ok ok

B. Origin of the Linear Arrangement of Unlike Cephalic Functions.—It is
frequently assumed that the primitive vertebrate head consisted of a considerable

ORIGIN OF THE ARRANGEMENT OF CEPHALIC FUNCTIONS. 9

number of like metameres, each one complete in itself, that is, having all the
organs of an ideal metamere. This assumption is untenable. A considerable
number of cephalic, or anterior metameres, even approximately complete or
perfect, rarely, if ever, occur in any animal outside those pictured in text-book
diagrams. It is certain that no such condition occurs in the arachnids. While
it may be assumed that metameric growth tends to produce a linear series of like
parts, it is clear that it does not do so in reality. The first products of apical
growth must necessarily differ from the last, because different conditions are cre-
ated by apical growth at each successive stage of its progress. The actual result,
therefore, is a linear sequence of ulike structures and functions for a given number
or generation of metameres. This particular sequence becomes unbalanced and
remodelled with the appearance of the next generation. But on the whole a
definite linear succession of unlike organs becomes established at a very early
period in the evolution of segmented animals; and it follows a logical, inherently
necessary order, that is never completely lost or disguised.

With the elongation and increase in size of the primitive trunk the ingestive,
gustatory, locomotor, cardiac, and respiratory functions become more localized,
their position being determined, in part, by the necessary conditions for their
activities, and in part by the historic order in which they became established; for
the location of any new function is limited to the territory that is not already pre-
empted by other organs. For that reason we find that the most essential organs
are the first to develop, and they arise from the oldest parts of the body, that is,
from the more anterior and median neural surface; the organs of more recent
origin arise on the hemal and caudal sides of the older ones.

The primary sense organs, 7.e., the parietal and lateral eyes, the olfactory
organs, and the coordinating centers (forebrain) are already definitely located in the
procephalon of the nauplius, which probably represents, in part, the remnants
of a trochosphere. These organs are, therefore, of very great antiquity. They
retain their original position throughout the entire range of the arthropod-verte-
brate phylum, and by the root-like extension of their nerve fibers establish re-
lations with the new metameres as fast as they are formed.

Hence the primary sense organs and the primary coordinating centers are
located at the anterior end of the body, not, as is frequently asserted, because the
body moves head first, or because of any necessary correlation between the location
of the brain and sense organs (Parker), but because the head is the oldest part of
the animal, and because these particular sense organs and nerve centers were, in
a historic sense, the first ones to be definitely established, taking their origin back
to a period when the primitive head was the whole body.

With the appearance of the first postcephalic metameres, arose the first
gustatory organs, and the first swimming, grasping, crushing, and chewing ap-
pendages. They were necessarily located immediately behind the primitive
head, in the oral region. With the addition of another generation of metameres,
the body became heavier and larger, and the appendages on the new metameres

Io OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

were used as supplementary swimming, or respiratory appendages, or for crawling
or walking, and the circulatory organs appeared in the hemal region. (Fig. 308.)

The internal organs, such as the stomach, digestive glands, gut pouches,
organs of excretion and generation, establish their relations to the rest of the body,
if at all, through the circulation. They are less dependent on location, or on

Fic. 4 _—Diagrams showing location of principal organs in Bothriolepis and a primitive vertebrate. A,B, Hemal;
view; C, neural view. A, Bothriolepis; B, C, primitive vertebrate.

specialization in form, for effective action, hence they are eventually crowded into
the more posterior metameres, or they atrophy and new ones arise farther back
to take their places. (Figs. 307, 308.)

In the typical arachnids, a definite linear arrangement of unlike functions, in
accordance with the above principles, is established at an early period. The
order is essentially the same as that in the vertebrate head, and is as follows:
olfactory, coordinating, visual, swallowing, gustatory, auditory, locomotor, equili-
bratory, cardiac, and respiratory. (Figs. 5, 57 and 114.)

In the posterior cephalic regions, the digestive, excretory, and genital organs
are closely associated with, or overlap, the branchial and cardiac organs, this
arrangement forming a conspicuous feature in the arachnids. It appears to be
retained, to a large extent, in Bothriolepis and other ostracoderms. (Fig. 5.) In
the vertebrates, this arrangement is further modified by the atrophy of the pre-
branchial locomotor appendages, by the formation of new ones behind the gills,

THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE HEAD. II

and by the gradual transfer of the digestive and urinogenital system still farther
back into the newly developing trunk.

We need not follow in detail the further progress of these changes in the
higher vertebrates; the atrophy of the gills and the development of the lungs
behind them; the atrophy of head kidneys, and the development of new ones
farther, and then again farther back; and the final shifting of locomotor func-
tions to the pelvic appendages, are all familiar manifestations of the same
process.

Thus the evolution of the arthropod-vertebrate stock consists: 1. in the
successive generation of groups of like metameres, each group being from the
beginning somewhat different from the preceding one; 2. in the subsequent en-
largement, diminution, or elimination of segmental organs and the consequent re-
adjustments that follow these changes; the result always leading toward a more
successful linear coordination of unlike organs, the process attaining its highest
expression in man. Hence, broadly speaking, the progress of organic evolution
in segmented animals may be measured by the extent to which the linear coordi-
nation of unlike organs replaces the linear succession of like metameres.

IV. THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE INCIPIENT VERTEBRATE HEAD IN
Tue ARACHNIDS.

The five main divisions of the anterior part of the body in the arachnids are
as follows: (Figs. 3, 5, 14-21.) 1. The procephalon, or primitive head, consists
of three pre-oral segments, the principal organs contained in it being the rostrum,
olfactory lobes, cerebral hemispheres, the visual and the olfactory organs. 2.
The dicephalon consists of two or three metameres immediately surrounding the
mouth, and includes the stomodeum with its appropriate nerve centers, the leg-
jaws, principal gustatory organs, and the anterior part of the endocranium. 3.
The mesocephalon consists of three or four posterior thoracic metameres and in-
cludes the principal locomotor appendages, auditory and excretory organs, and
the posterior part of the endocranium. 4. The metacephalon, or vagus region,
consists of from two to four greatly modified metameres, the appendages being
either very small and standing close to the median line, or absent, or converted
into sense organs. The neuromeres and their ganglia are large, but very compact.
Other components of the metameres are absent, or small and degenerate. The
whole region forms a highly specialized, constricted intermediate zone lying be-
tween the mesocephalon and the next following division. 5. The branchio-
cephalon consists of four or five metameres, in which are located the principal
respiratory organs, branchial cartilages, and the heart.

The Brain.—The structure and grouping of the neuromeres reflect the condi-
tions characteristic of these subdivisions of the body, thus laying the foundations
for the subdivisions of the brain in vertebrates. In the latter, the original appearance

[2 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

of the arachnid brain is modified by the closure of the old mouth, and by the loca-
tion of the optic ganglia over the diencephalic and mesencephalic neuromeres,
instead of over the prosencephalic ones, to which they really belong. (Figs. 46,
47, 57 and 58.)

The Mesoderm. (Fig. 138, A and B).—The procephalic mesoderm is scanty
and in the early embryonic stages forms a single, thin-walled coelomic chamber.
In the dicephalon and mesocephalon, six pairs of coelomic chambers are formed,
constituting true somites, or head cavities; but segmented lateral plates are con-

OC...

a.ey. Olfactory.

a>) 2s
Pro.C. --- aa Coord pa ey,
__gust.o S Visual. ey.
DiC. ( Masticatory. :
Mes.C MuGiery, 2

Aioyeidsay

So:

Ss

Te

DS

Fic. 5.—Diagrams showing the probable relations between the subdivisions of the head and trunk, and the location
of the principal organs in an insect, merostome and ostracoderm (Bothriolepis) seen from the neural side.

spicuously absent. In the metacephalon and branchiocephalon, distinct somites
and lateral plates are developed in each metamere.

The Middlecord, or lemmatochord (notochord of vertebrates), extends through
the posterior sections of the head. In the older stages it may terminate in an
enlargement in the mesocephalon, but it never extends beyond the dicephalon,
ending abruptly just behind the stomodeum (infundibulum).

Let us examine these subdivisions of the future head more carefully.

1. The Procephalon.

The procephalon is the primitive head. In the adult arachnids, it is, exter-
nally, an irregular, ill defined area of ectoderm within which lie the rostrum, and
the primitive visual and olfactory organs. (Figs. 149-155, p.c.) In the early
embryonic stages, it is represented by the procephalic lobes, from which the fore-

THE PROCEPHALON. 13

brain with its olfactory lobes, hemispheres, and its appropriate sense organs are
derived. (Figs. 14-21.) The structure of the procephalic lobes, their main
divisions, and the relations of the three sets of primary sense organs to them,
are practically identical throughout the arthropod series. In the higher arachnids,
their structure and mode of development, and that of their associated sense organs,
resembles that of the vertebrates.

In Insects (Acilius), the procephalic lobes consist of three segments, each one
containing a neuromere, an optic ganglion, a segment of the marginal plate, and
two pairs of segmental sense organs, or
ocelli. (Fig. 14.) Three infoldings occur
on the margins of the lobes, between the
optic plate and the optic ganglia, iv’ “,
but they soon close without involving the
marginal sense organs, and without form-
ing a common cerebral vesicle.

In the Arachnids (scorpion), the lobes
are at first similar to those of Acilius; later
they are depressed, and a thin marginal
fold, or neural crest, advances over them,
converting the entire forebrain into a hol-
low vesicle that for a long time opens to
the exterior through an anterior neuropore.
(Figs. 15, 16, 18, 46, 47, an.p. and eph.)

Sense Organs.—Meantime the anterior
pair of marginal sense organs move forward
and unite in the median line to form the
anlage of the olfactory organ (Limulus).
(Figs. 38, 39, T41, 142, 153, ol.o.) The two
pairs of sense organs on the second seg-
ment (ocellar placodes, parietal eyes) are
ingulfed in the palial overgrowth and carried | Fis. 6.—~Mesonacis (Olenellus)_ vermontana

2 2 (Hall). Lower Cambrian, showing body regions,
to the middle of the roof of the forebrain ana groups of like metameres, or tagmata.
vesicle. Here a tubular outgrowth is for-
med, on the end of which the ocellar placodes are located, after the manner
of a typical parietal eye. (Figs. 46, 47, 57, 141, 142, pa.e.) In the arach-
nids, the sense organs of the third segment (lateral eye) lie for a time on the
outer margin of the neural crests, but later they move away from them,
so they are not ingulfed in the palial overgrowth. (Fig. 16, A./.e.) The lateral
eyes of insects, crustaceans, and arachnids appear to belong to the fourth neuro-
mere (antennal or cheliceral), that is, to the first metamere of the next division
of the head.

Olfactory Lobes, Hemispheres and Optic Ganglia.—During the formation of
the palial overgrowth, the first forebrain segment becomes deeply infolded to

I4 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

form the olfactory lobes. The cerebral hemispheres arise from the median part
of the second segment, the optic ganglia of the parietal eye (ganglion habenula),
from the lateral margin of the second segment, and the ganglion of the lateral
eyes (tectum opticum), from the lateral lobes of the third or fourth segment.
(Figs. 15, 46, 47, ol.l.)

The Rostrum (labrum) in insects arises as a pair of small cephalic appen-
dages, on the very anterior median margin of the cephalic lobes. (Fig. 14.) In
the arachnids it forms an unpaired, immovable process, which in the later stages
lies on the anterior margin of the mouth. (Figs. 15, 17, 18, 43, 47.) It differs
from all other arthropod appendages, in that it receives its nerves from ganglia

Fic. 7.—Primitive crustacea seen from the neural surface, showing various arrangements of the procephalic sense
organs. A, Sida; B, Limnadia larva; C, Branchipus larva.

situated on the median side of each nerve cord, that is, from the stomodzal ganglia
and commissure, which are situated near the fourth, or first post-oral, segment.
(Figs. 38 and 39, st.g.)

External Boundaries of the Procephalon in the Adult-—The margins of the
ectodermic area covering the outer surface of the forebrain, after the palial over-
growth is formed, mark the boundaries of the primitive head. The latter becomes
greatly distorted by the forebrain flexure, which carries the anterior part of the
forebrain round the end of the egg onto the future hemal surface, while the pos-
terior part is drawn a long way backward by the caudad migration of the mouth
and rostrum. (Figs. 3, 17, 43, 44, 46.) It thus happens that the neural surface
of the procephalon is the only one that is actually developed. The hemal surface
is not formed from procephalic tissue, but by the extension of the lateral and
anterior margins of the procephalic lobes around the anterior end of the ovum,

THE DICEPHALON AND MESOCEPHALON. 15

and by their union there with the hemal end of the first thoracic metameres.
(Fig. 17.)

In this way the original area of the procephalic ectoderm has been greatly
extended. In the adult Limulus, it is divided into two isolated parts: that which
has been carried onto the hemal surface of the carapace, and that which remains
on the neural surface. (Figs. 141-155.) The latter portion may be approxi-
mately defined as an elongated area, with the olfactory organ at its anterior end
and the apex of the rostrum at its posterior end; it is drawn out laterally by the
migration of the lateral eyes toward the posterior hemal surface. (Fig. 153, pr.c.)

In the scorpion, there is a neural and hemal section of the procephalon, as in
Limulus. (Comp. Figs. 16, 17, 18, 43.) The original neural surface of the em-
bryonic procephalon has been doubled over in the adult so that its anterior edge
lies on the hemal surface, directed backward instead of forward. (Figs. 17, 22.)

Fic. 8.—Primitive crustaceans (Cladocera). Fic. 9.—Same in side view and in median
A, Neural surface; B, hemal. section.

It is important to bear these facts in mind, since where these changes have
taken place, the linear arrangement of the segmental sense organs appears to be
the reverse of what it is when the procephalon remains largely on the neural
surface, as it does in many phyllopods and vertebrates. (Figs. 7, 8, 9, 34.)

2-3. The Dicephalon and the Mesocephalon.

The dicephalon and the mesocephalon include the first six or seven post-oral
metameres, frequently spoken of as the thorax. It is generally divided into two
regions. The anterior one, the dicephalon, consists of two or three circum-oral
metameres whose appendages may be smaller than the others, and specially
modified to serve as leg-jaws for testing, holding, tearing, or crushing food, and
conveying it to the mouth. It includes the stomodeum and the stomodzal
ganglia, the latter being intimately associated with the gustatory and swallowing
reflexes. The posterior division, or mesocephalon, comprises three or four well-
developed metameres whose appendages serve for walking or swimming. .

16 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

In the insects, the first four metameres fuse with each other, and with the
procephalon, to form the so-called “head,” the last three metameres usually
remaining separate. (Figs. 3,4, 5,4.)

In phyllopods (Branchipus) the first two metameres, and possibly an evanes-
cent third, or premandibular, fuse with each other and with the procephalon.
The remaining three metameres, the mandibular and two maxillary, fuse with
each other, forming a group by themselves distinct from the anterior division.

In arachnids, such as the scorpions, spiders, trilobites, and merostomes,
all six thoracic metameres unite with one another and with the procephalon to
form the cephalothorax, leaving on the hemal side little or no indication of the
larger divisions, or of the more primitive division into metameres.

On the neural side, the metameric structure is
always retained. The reduction in size, and the
modification of the first two or three pairs of appen-
dages for feeding purposes, are usually clearly indica-
ted, the last three or four pairs serving mainly for
locomotion.

In Limulus, the subdivision of the thorax into
an anterior and a posterior division at first sight does
not appear to exist; but I have shown that in abnor-
mal embryos the first two or three thoracic metameres
act as a unit, in that they frequently separate from
the posterior ones opposite the large thoracic sense
organs, or they fuse with each other, or disappear
entirely, or otherwise manifest a distinct independence
in their development. The large thoracic placodes,
the forerunners of the auditory placodes of verte-
brates, mark this latent cleavage line between the
Fic. 1o.—Mesothyra (after Hall and group of oral metameres of the diacephalon, and those

Clark). Upper Devonian. e ji
belonging to the mesocephalon. (Figs. 141, 142,
184-188.)

The endocranium arose primarily in association with the dicephalic met-
ameres, but in the higher forms takes its origin from the mesocephalic meta-
meres also. With the concentration of all the cranial neuromeres, the endo-
cranium embraces, or underlies all of them except the more posterior ones of
the branchiocephalon.

* * ok ok ok * * * *

Oral Arches——The basal joints of the thoracic appendages, especially in
the arachnids, are greatly expanded where they join the body, forming oblong
arches to which the slender, more movable part of the appendage is attached. In
the arachnids, these basal arches may be located some distance from the median
line, on the lateral wall of the head. At least four or five of these anterior thoracic

THE DICEPHALON AND MICROCEPHALON. 17

arches persist as the circumoral, visceral arches of vertebrates, that is, as the
pre-maxillary, maxillary, mandibular, and hyoid arches, and possibly the first
gillarch. (Figs. 32-34, 160-172.)

* * * * * * * * *

Taste Buds, Slime Buds, and Cranial Ganglia.—In the typical appendicular
arches of arachnids, there is a lobe on the median or neural side that forms the
mandibular or coxal spurs, and in which are located important groups of sense
organs, i.e., gustatory buds and slime buds. They are the forerunners of the

Fic. 11. Fic, 12.

Fic. r1.—Diagrams of marine arachnids, to illustrate the relations of their organs to those in the ostracoderms.

Fic. 12.—C, hypothetical form, intermediate between a merostome and an ostracoderm (Cephalaspis); D, is
an accurate restoration of a small cephalaspid (sp. nov. ?) from Scaumenac Bay, P.Q., except the external gill,
ex. g. which are hypothetical.

“epibranchial organs,” “lateral line organs,” and “gustatory organs” of verte-

brates. At an early embryonic period, in the wide zone between the nerve cord
and the coxal and gustatory spurs, and in close connection with the latter, immense
oblong ganglia (pedal ganglia) are developed from thickenings of the overlying
ectoderm. (Figs. -36-39, 134-137.) ‘These ganglia arise independently of the
medullary plates. Later, they unite the proximal end of the pedal nerve with the
corresponding neuromere. They are the forerunners of the cranial ganglia of
vertebrates,

Segmental Sense Organs.—In the scorpion, each appendicular arch, except
the first, has, on its lateral margin, close to the base of the coxa, two sensory cups,
in form and in minute structure very similar to the conspicuous pits on the outer
surface of the neuromeres. (Figs. 15-16, 74, s.so.) All these pits quickly lose
their sensory character and later apparently disappear or are converted into gan-
glion cells.

2

18 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

Similar segmental sense organs are seen in Limulus, but farther removed from
the bases of the appendages. ‘he one that develops into the so-called “dorsal.
organ” (auditory pit of vertebrates) lies opposite the fourth appendage. (Figs.
140-153, s.0.*) Later it becomes greatly enlarged and is a conspicuous feature
on the hemal margin of the thorax till after the last moult of the trilobite stage.
At the height of its development, it is a disc-shaped thickening, slightly pigmented
and sensory in appearance. (Fig. 131.)
The four remaining pits (Fig. 140) are
very faint and transitory, although in the
corresponding regions of the adult, there
are patches, or knobs of skin that are highly
sensitive and richly supplied with nerves.
The thoracic segmental sense organs of
Limulus and the scorpion lie nearly in line
with the cephalic sense organs, and are
probably serially homologous with them.

* * * * *

The Diencephalon and the Mesencep-
halon.—We may recognize two groups of
thoracic neuromeres, the diencephalon and
mesencephalon, approximately correspond-
ing with the external divisions of the thorax.

The diencephalon, or tween-brain,
consists of the first one, or two or three,
neuromeres that surround the oesophagus.

It includes the large, lateral stomodzal
ganglia that are attached to the median wall
of the cheliceral neuromere, but which arise
as thickenings, or evaginations, from the
side walls of the cesophagus. These neu-

Fic. 13.—Bunodeslunula. Restorationfrom Tomeres contain the swallowing center and
nemesis Speninien, Se ihe anthers: colkeiet oy impetvamt center ter all the taterersane

obtained from the island of Oesel, Russia. Photo-
graph of enlarged plaster model by the author. of the more posterior thoracic appendages.

X about 2. :
(Fig. 114.)

The enlargement and closer union of the thoracic neuromeres, and the back-
ward overgrowth of the rostrum and the optic ganglia, ultimately lead to the
closure of the mouth. After it closes, the inner end of the stomodeum persists
in vertebrates as the epithelium of the saccus vasculosus, the passageway between
the circum-oesophageal neuromeres becomes the infundibulum, and the stomo-
deal ganglia, arising from its deeper side walls, the lobi inferiori. (Figs. 43 and
44.) The last position occupied by the arachnid mouth may be identified in

THE METACEPHALON. 19

vertebrates, as the opening behind the cerebellum, now closed by the choroid
plexus of the fourth ventricle. (Figs. 3, 43, 44, 46, 58.)

The mesencephalon consists of the last three or four thoracic neuromeres;
they are usually conspicuous for their distinctness, great breadth and volume,
and for the large size of their ganglia. In the vertebrates, they form the pos-
terior portion of the crura cerebri, and are still further accentuated as one of the
principal divisions of the brain, by the migration of the optic ganglia of the lateral
eyes backward and upward till they come to overlie them as the tectum opticum.
The parietal eye ganglia overlie the diencephalon as the ganglia habenule. (Figs.
43) 44, 57, 58.)

The Suprastomodeal Commissure and the Cerebellum.—In all arthropods,
the lateral stomodeal ganglia are united by a large commissure that forms a
prominent arch over the anterior or neural surface of the stomodeum. This com-
missure is one of the most conspicuous and constant landmarks in the arthropod
brain. (Fig. 3, st.co.) In the insects, it contains a large, median mass of gan-
glion cells, arising as an evagination, or as a thickening, in the anterior, median
wall of the stomodzum, close to its external opening. (Fig. 3, a.) The projecting
arch of the commissure becomes crowded backward by the backward migration
of the mouth and rostrum, and by the increasing size of the lateral eye ganglia,
forming in vertebrates the rudiment of the cerebellum. (Figs. 3, D, and 46.)

Thus the median stomodeal ganglion of arthropods and the cerebellum of
vertebrates are the only brain structures that may be said to arise originally in the
median line above the neural surface of the brain; the parietal eyes, the ganglia
habenule, and the optic lobes being originally paired structures arising from the
lateral margins of the medullary plate.

4. The Metacephalon, or Vagus Region.

The metacephalon, or vagus region, forms a remarkable intermediate zone
between the mesocephalon and the branchiocephalon. It consists of from one
to four metameres that usually atrophy, or fuse with one another at an early
period, leaving little or no external trace of their existence in the adult. Their
feeble development is the principal cause of the sharp constriction which, in many
insects and arachnids, separates the thorax from the abdomen. (Figs. 3, 6, 14,
15, 16, 46, 47, 57, M. c. or vg." *.)

The vagus appendages rarely serve as locomotor or respiratory organs. They
show a marked tendency to become unpaired; they may dwindle into insignifi-
cance, or they may be retained as highly specialized sense organs (chilaria and
metastoma of merostomes; genital papillze and pectens of scorpions).

The vagus neuromeres, on the other hand, are well-developed, but they fuse
with one another so quickly that it is very difficult to distinguish their boundaries
after the early embryonic stages. Their motor elements are greatly reduced and
the sensory ones correspondingly enlarged, owing to the reduction of the corre-

20 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

sponding trunk muscles and the absence of appendages, or their conversion into
sense organs. In them is located an important decussation of the longitudinal
tracts passing from the cord to the brain, and vice versa; and the vagus neuro-
meres are the most anterior ones in which such a crossing takes place. (Figs.
65, 66, 114, v.dec.)

The vagus nerves have special relations with the heart, intestine, and integu-
ment. They are the only segmental nerves that are persistently directed back-
ward into foreign territory, a result that is due in part to the forward concentration
of the vagus neuromeres, and in part to the backward growth of the nerves and
the atrophy of their native metameres. (Figs. 38, 42, 57, 70, 71.)

Fic. 14.—Diagram of an insect embryo (Acilius) in Fic. 15.—Scorpion embryos in mercator
mercator projection. projection,

The interpolation of the vagus neuromeres between the mesencephalon and
the branchiencephalon is a very important and striking feature in the morphology
of the arachnids. They form a compact group, or distinct brain region, which in
its anatomical and physiological characters, and in the distribution of its nerves,
is very similar to the vagus region of vertebrates.

5. The Branchiocephalon.

This group of metameres, four or five in number, is the least specialized of
any so far considered. The appendages may be well-developed (Limulus and
many crustacea) or they may be rudimentary. In the higher forms, this region
is chiefly notable as the site of the respiratory organs, i.e., the trachee, gills, lung-
books, and heart. (Fig. 3, br.c.)

The mesoderm is complete, each metamere containing well developed somites

THE ENDOCRANIUM. 21

and lateral plates. (Figs. 16, 142.) The most characteristic organs found in
these metameres, such as the cartilaginous branchial bars and the segments of
the heart, arise from the mesoderm.

The neuromeres usually remain separate, but there is a tendency for the
anterior ones to move forward and join the vagus group. In vertebrates, the
entire group has joined the vagus neuromeres, forming the most posterior part of
the medulla. (Fig. 58.)

Nerves.—In the arachnids, the great complex of vagus and branchial nerves
has already made notable progress in that separation of components from the
primary segmental nerves, and in their regrouping into compound nerves whose
constituent parts have a common function, that is so characteristic of vertebrates.

We may recognize, for example, the beginning of the lateral line nerve in
the combined sensory components of the first three vagal appendages of the
scorpion. In Limulus, the primitive condition of the vertebrate cardiac nerves
is seen in the eight pairs of segmental cardiac nerves that arise from the vagal and
branchial neuromeres. (Figs. 59, 78, ¢’ “4.) The visceral arch nerves are repre-
sented by the branchial nerves, and the hypoglossal, by the combined group of
motor components that supply the great, branchio-thoracic muscles. (Fig. 77.)
The intestinal nerves are also indicated; z2*~ °°.

It is only necessary to unite the vagal and branchial neuromeres into a
more compact mass, and to complete the union of the sensory, branchial, hypo-
branchial, cardiac, and intestinal components into compound nerves, to realize
the characteristic condition so familiar in vertebrates. (Compare Figs. 57 and 58.)

It will be observed that the similarity exists, not only in the union of the
originally separate components into the same physiological groups, but that the
number of neuromeres and components is approximately the same; that their
topographical position is the same; and that the general course and distribution
of the resulting nerves is the same.

The Endocranium.

All the higher arachnids are provided with a cartilaginous endocranium that
is the forerunner of the primordial cranium of vertebrates. It may be traced
back to such primitive arthropods as Branchipus, Apus, and other phyllopods. In
Branchipus, it isa small plate of cartilage, lying on the hemal side of the mesen-
cephalon, and serving for the attachment of the mandibular muscles.

In the higher arachnids, it is more voluminous, serving mainly for the at-
tachment of the leg and jaw muscles, and for the great longitudinal muscles that
move the cephalothorax on the branchial section of the body. Its structure is
similar to that of the primordial cranium of vertebrates, and it has the same topo-
graphical relation to the brain and to the alimentary canal. The rudiments of
the following parts may be recognized: occipital ring, trabecule, pituitary fora-
men, and palato-pterygoid arch. (Figs. 209-220.)

22 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.
The Mesoderm.

Origin of the mesoderm. To understand the peculiarities of the cephalic
mesoderm, we must consider its origin as a whole.

In Limulus, the mesoderm arises in part from the telopore, a shallow, terminal
depression overlying a confused mass of proliferating nuclei destined to form meso-
derm, yolk cells, and endoderm. (Figs. 128 and 140.)

_ As the embryo elongates, the depression maintains its terminal position,
changing to a longitudinal groove, and finally taking the form of a typical primi-

Fic. 16.—Scorpion embryos in mercator projection.

tive streak. (Figs. 129, 130, 140, ¢.p.). From the primitive streak, a sheet of
mesoderm extends forward and laterally, finally breaking up into somites and
lateral plates.

In the abdominal, or branchiocephalic and vagal regions, the somites are
hollow, contain true coelomic cavities, and are quite distinct from the overlying
ectoderm. The corresponding lateral plates are sharply segmented, and they
are united, for a short period, with the overlying ectoderm. They appear to be
formed from the ectoderm by a local, inward proliferation, that takes place, not
only in the region of the germ wall, but along the lines that mark the anterior
and posterior boundaries of the lateral plates. (Fig. 128, a.)

On the peripheral margins of the expanding mesodermic area, no segmenta-

THE MESODERM. 23

tion of any kind is visible. Ectoderm, mesoderm, and yolk cells form a common,
thickened rim, or germ wall, similar in general appearance to the early stages of
the primitive streak, and extending along the entire lateral margins of the germinal
area. (Figs. 140-142.)

The post-oral mesoderm therefore arises from three distinct sources. The
axial portion, consisting of the double line of mesoblastic somites, arises from the
primitive streak; it represents the trail of mesoderm cells left behind as the telo-
blasts of the primitive streak migrate backward. The greater part of the lateral
plate mesoderm is formed from the proliferating cells of the germ wall, as it
spreads over the surface of the yolk in a lateral] direction. But on the median
side of the germ wall, the definitive ectoderm continues to proliferate inward for
a considerable distance along the lines that separate the lateral plates. The cells
thus produced form a part of the lateral plates, and the proliferating lines break
the lateral sheet of mesoderm into distinct segments.

The dicephalic and mesocephalic (thoracic) mesoderm of arachnids presents
a most important modification. It forms at first, a well defined band on either
side of the nerve cord. Each band then becomes divided into distinct coelomic
chambers or somites; but segmented lateral plates are absent, the mesoderm of
that region consisting of scattered cells that are not visible in surface views.
(Figs. 15, 16, 19-21.) From the thoracic somites, or head cavities, arise the
muscles of the appendages, the cartilaginous cranium, and the secreting cells of
the coxal gland, or head kidney.

The procephalic mesoderm is scanty and unsegmented, forming a thin
walled, unpaired ccelomic vesicle that breaks down into scattered cells. The
procephalic mesoderm appears to arise from the primitive cumulus before apical
growth begins.

Comparison.—With the progress of cephalization in the arthropods, there
has been, therefore, a steady decrease in the volume of mesodermic structures.
In the higher arachnids, mesoderm is almost absent in the procephalon, and the
lateral plates are absent in the dicephalic and mesocephalic regions. The result,
or cause, if you will, is the absence of the thoracic.sections of the heart and of the
longitudinal, intersegmental muscles; the shortened thoracic tergites then fuse
with one another and with the procephalon to form a continuous unsegmented
shield, or cephalic buckler.

In the vertebrates, the decrease in volume of the cephalic mesoderm is carried
still further, affecting the anterior head regions, as well as the more posterior
ones, that in the arthropods are usually well equipped with mesodermic structures.
This decrease is due chiefly to the progressive atrophy, or fusion, or condensation
of what were originally freely movable parts, and the consequent reduction in the
number and volume of cranial muscles. For example, practically all the hemal,
longitudinal, intersegmental muscles disappear with the fusion of the branchial
region with the head. ‘The several pairs of originally separate leg-jaws fuse into
unpaired oral arches, only one of which is freely movable. The mesocephalic

24 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

locomotor appendages and their voluminous muscles disappear, and also numerous
endocranial muscles, owing to the union of the endocranium with the dermal
skeleton. Finally the branchial appendages lose a part of their muscles in their
conversion into lung-book-like gill pouches.

This progressive degeneration of the cephalic mesoderm, from before back-
ward, has been, therefore, an ever present factor, exercising a persistent and power-
ful influence over the form of the head and the structure of the brain thoroughout
the whole arthropod-vertebrate phylum.

The Vascular Area and Concrescence.

Vascular Area.—The mode of growth of the extra embryonic area, the
concrescence of the germ wall, and the character of the mesoderm in the various
regions is shown in Fig. 138.

et to. ml

bna.

Fic. 17.—A-C, Scorpion embryos in side view, semi-diagrammatic. The thoracic appendages are removed in B
and C. D, Diagram indicating relations of the cephalic organs in arachnids to those in vertebrates.

The margin of the germinal area belonging to the thoracic metameres is
greatly thickened, forming large masses of spherical or oval cells containing a
small excentric nucleus, and a brilliantly refractive, colorless thread, usually
coiled with great regularity in the long axis of the cell. (Fig. 131.)

Some of these cells are ultimately converted into muscles, others remain as
free amceboid cells, and in the adult may be found in great numbers scattered
among the connective tissue lacune, in the anterior part of the cephalothorax.

Whether the degenerating muscle cells of the cephalothorax are to be re-
garded as true blood corpuscles or not is doubtful; but it is evident that owing
to the increase in size of the yolk sphere, there is already established, in the higher

THE CEPHALIC NAVEL. 25

arachnids, an extra embryonic germinal area, and that certain parts of this area
may be regarded as the beginning of an extra embryonic vascular area. The
peripheral ends of the vagus and abdominal lateral plates give rise to the heart,
pericardium, longitudinal hemal muscles, and to blood corpuscles.

Concrescence.—As the lateral margins of the germinal area grow faster
than the median portion, concrescence of the germinal wall will ultimately occur
in the precephalic and post caudal regions. In very large yolked eggs, pre-
cephalic concrescence will tend to bring the cardiomeres into conjunction, either
in front of, or underneath the procephalon, that is in their characteristic position
in vertebrates. (Figs. 17-23, 138, 140, 141.)

The post caudal concrescence will tend to unite the posterior margins of
the germ wall behind the real apex of the body, giving rise to the various
phenomena in vertebrates that have been confused with “gastrulation,” “con-
crescence of the lips of the blastopore,”’ and with apical growth.

The New Mouth, Cephalic Navel, or Hemastoma.

In the arachnids, there is a special area on the anterior hemal surface,
just in front of the procephalon, that we shall call the cephalic navel. It prob-
ably occurs in all arthropods, under various modifications, as the so-called dorsal
organ. It is primarily a thickening of the hemal blastoderm, entirely outside, or
beyond the germinal area. In the arach-
nids, the thickened blastoderm gives rise
to an immense mass of proliferating cells
that are ultimately invaginated into the
yolk, where they degenerate and are absor-
bed. This infolded area of degenerating
cells forms the central point toward which
all the surrounding organs converge; the
germ wall, with its appropriate structures
advancing toward its sides and posterior
margin, and the procephalon toward the
anterior one. There is thus formed, either
in front of, or below, the procephalon, a Fic. 18.—Anterior end of an embryo scorpion,
vortex cenfer toward which all the sum Ge Or eee eel
rounding organs move, and into which is
infolded the remnants of the hemal blastoderm (Figs. 23, 127, 138, 139, ¢.nv-)
The opening between the enteron and the exterior, thus virtually established on
the hemal surface, finally closes in the arthropods, but in the vertebrates a
permanent opening is established at this point, that becomes the new mouth, or
the hemastoma.

Although the cephalic navel ultimately closes in the arthropods, prophetic
signs of its future function are not lacking, for on the site where it is formed,

26 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

there are frequently developed adhesive discs (phyllopods), or root-like out-
growths (cirripeds, copepods) that serve as organs of attachment, or for the ab-
sorption of nutriment.

_ The cephalic navel of arthropods may be regarded as one of the inevitable
products of apical growth on a spherical yolk surface, just as the belly navel of
vertebrates is a product of the peculiar method of closing up the hemal surface.
The center, around which the converging lips of the cephalic navel are formed,
is the degenerating area of hemal blastoderm, often called the dorsal organ.

The Closure of the Old Mouth or Neostoma.

In the arachnids, there is a progressive enlargement and fusion of the an-
terior cephalic neuromeres, that gradually leads toward the narrowing of the
passageway for the stomodeum, and ultimately to the closing of the mouth. The
backward growth of the rostrum and the transfer of the optic ganglia to the
region overlying the mouth, due apparently to remote, but persistent and cumu-
lative causes, are contributory factors in bringing about this result.

These conditions at first lead to a profound modification of the mode of life,
making a liquid, or finely divided diet a necessity, and ultimately to the utilization
of the cephalic navel as a new entrance to the alimentary canal.

Conclusion.

In the arachnids, the body is built up by successive generations of new groups
of metameres, or tagmata, at definite historic periods in the évolution of the phylum.

The process of cephalizing the anterior regions of the body consists in the
gradual and extensive elimination of motor elements and the establishment of a
definite sequence of functions and organs, according to an inherently necessary
order.

The first five tagmata embrace the first sixteen metameres and lay the founda-
tions for the head in vertebrates. Each tagma is characterized by a special number
of metameres, by peculiarities in the number and structure of its neuromeres,
sense organs, ganglia, nerves, mesoderm and endo-skeleton, and by their sequence
and mode of growth, that are in essential agreement with those in the corre-
sponding divisions of the vertebrate head.

The arachnid body consists of metameres added to the primitive head, which
represents the remnants of the coelenterate body. The greater part of the arachnid
body and its primitive head forms the vertebrate head. Nearly all the vertebrate
body consists of a new generation of metameres, not represented in arachnids.

The conditions created by apical growth, by cephalization, and by the increase
in the volume of the yolk sphere, lead to the closure of the old mouth, and to the
formation of a new one on the hemal surface, the primitive dorsal organ forming
the starting point for the cephalic navel, that ultimately becomes the new mouth.

CHAPTER IT.

OUTLINE OF ARACHNID THEORY; CONTINUED.

I. Comparison oF ADULT ARTHROPODS WiTH ADULT VERTEBRATES.

The preceding analyses have shown, that beneath a heavy disguise of con-
tour and surface detail, the structural plan of an arachnid and of a primitive
vertebrate is after all the same. Let us now consider several types of adult
arthropods and see how they compare with vertebrates.

I. Orientation of Neural and Hemal Surfaces.

It will be seen that although the location of the eyes and the shape of the
body indicate the usual position of the animal during locomotion, they afford no
certain evidence as to which is the neural and which the hemal surface, for the
pattern formed by the sense organs on the neural surface of the cephalothorax
of some arthropods may be very similar to that on the hemal surface in others,
and this fact must be borne in mind when comparing them either with ostraco-
derms or with true vertebrates.

In the phyllopods, and in many other crustacea that swim neural side up by
means of oar-like cephalic appendages, the center of gravity usually lies below
the attachments of the swimming appendages. In such cases the parietal ocelli
and lateral eyes lie near their original embryonic position, on the upper, or neural
surface, as they do in vertebrates. (Figs. 7, 9, 244, 247 and 260.)

Where locomotion is effected either side up, as in Limulus, the prevalent mode
of life may be indicated by the position of the eyes and legs, and by the shape of
the body. Limulus, for example, uses its sixth pair of legs as pushing poles,
as it moves over soft bottoms, or crawls along partly buried in sand, with
little more than the median and lateral eyes exposed. During the adult stage,
however, it frequently swims, neural side up, for considerable periods, and per-
sistently does so in the larval or trilobite stages, the sloping, anterior margin of
the shield, like a well turned bow of a boat, holding the head up and the body
properly balanced. The same modes of life and dual methods of locomotion
undoubtedly occurred in many trilobites and merostomes, and when the free
swimming life predominates, one or more pairs of appendages are enormously
enlarged to form heavy, oar-like swimming appendages. The lateral eyes may
then lie well forward on the head, between the neural and the hemal surfaces
(Fig. 5).

27

28 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

In Bothriolepis (Figs. 247 and 248), we have a similarly shaped body, with
similar oar-like cephalic appendages, and from the various positions in which
they are found in the deposits, there can be no doubt that they crawled, partly
buried in soft mud, with the ocular, or neural side up, but swam with the neural
side down, the center of gravity lying below the attachment of the arms toward
the bottom of the boat-shaped head. The same was probably true of Cyathaspis
(Fig. 244), Tremataspis (Fig. 236), Pteraspis, and probably to a less extent of
Cephalaspis (Fig. 232).

Fic. 19.—Embryos of a spider in side view.

The prevailing position among vertebrates is unquestionably with the neural
side uppermost, although, as we have just seen, the most primitive vertebrates
may move about with either side up. It is by no means true that the prevailing
position of the invertebrates is with the neural side down. In many annelids,
there appears to be no fixed position for the neural and hemal surfaces. In
most crawling arthropods (insects and spiders), the neural side is directed down-
ward, but probably in the vast majority of phyllopods, cladocera, copepods,
merostomes, and trilobites, and in the larve of decapods and cirripedg, the pre-
vailing position, when swimming freely, is with the neural side uppermost, and
that is the approximate position in practically all the adult cirripeds.

BUNODES. 29

It is thus clear that the position of the animal during locomotion has no
morphological value whatever. It is necessary to emphasize this point, because
the ancient superstition, to the effect that it is always the same surface of a verte-
brate or of an invertebrate that points heavenward, or that it is the baptismal name
of a surface that determines its identity, is still deeply rooted in the minds of an
incredible number of zoologists.

II. Comparison oF ADULT ARTHROPODS AND VERTEBRATES.

Bunodes.—The form that perhaps most nearly realizes the generalized
arachnid type we have tried to portray is Bunodes, a small, silurian merostome
from the island of Oesel, Russia. (Fig. 13.) In my visit to this island in 1901,
a large collection of these forms was obtained from which I have made a large
scale model, showing in detail the essential features of the hemal surface. This
animal is remarkable for the fact that it has no recognizable exoskeleton. The
fossils consist of well defined, but very thin, carbonaceous films, in a fine chalky
matrix. They are found side by side with small eurypterids that are covered
with a delicate chitenous membrane, still retaining apparently its original, chem-
ical structure, and close to fragments of Tremataspis, consisting of perfectly
preserved, calcareous, dermal plates. It is therefore probable that Bunodes had
neither a chitenous nor a calcareous exoskeleton.

The general form of the body is intermediate between that of Limulus and
that of a trilobite, or of a typical merostome. All the five head divisions, except
the diacephalon, are clearly indicated, and they are surprisingly like those in
larval Limuli (Fig. 152). There is a distinct procephalon, six thoracic, two vagal
(chelarial and opercular ?), and five branchial metameres. The most remarkable
feature is a pair of short, slender antennz clearly seen in one specimen.

For the sake of exposition we may picture to ourselves the manner in which
an adult arachnid, or other arthropod, might be moulded intoa vertebrate, although
it is manifestly impossible for any adult animal to be converted into another.
We may start with a form like Limulus, or Bunodes, or an eurypterid, or with an
adult phyllopod, like Branchipus, or a cladoceran, or cirriped.

In practically all these animals, extensive lateral, or pleural folds develop
on the sides of the cephalothorax, that either extend in a nearly horizontal plane,
to form a broad, shield-shaped cephalothorax, with backwardly directed cornua,
as in the marine arachnids (Fig. 155), or the folds may be directed toward the
neural surface, forming, in extreme cases, the bivalve shield, or mantle, of phyllo-
pods (Fig. 273), ostracoda (Fig. 307), cladocera (Figs. 8 and 9), and cirripeds
(Fig. 275). It may enclose the head, or the entire body, in a large peribranchial,
or atrial chamber, which contains, or into which opens, the nutrient, excretory,
respiratory, and genital organs. Another characteristic feature is the often
enormous labrum, or rostrum, that shows a persistent tendency to migrate back-
ward, forming an overhanging lid to the mouth (Fig. 7). The rostrum and the

30 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

Fic. 20.—Spider embryos in mercator projection, Camera-outlines.

Fic. 21.—Spider embryo in mercator projection. Camera-outlines.

COMPARISON OF ADULT ARTHROPODS AND VERTEBRATES. 31

atrial folds, together with the branchial and oral appendages, thus tend to enclose
the mouth in an ever deepening chamber. When this condition approaches its
extreme development—cirripeds, cladocera, etc. (Figs. 273-275)—the mouth be-
comes very inaccessible, and food can only reach it in a finely divided condition,
carried there by roundabout ways, in the currents of water produced by the swim-
ming, the oral, or the branchial appendages. Or the mouth may become com-
pletely closed, as in many dwarf, or parasitic cirripeds. (Figs. 280 and 281.)
Under these conditions the form and general appearance of a phyllopod-like
arthropod, with its large branchial, or atrial, chamber, and its oar-like cephalic
appendages, approaches that of some simple ostracoderms, like Cyathaspis, or
Pteraspis. (Comp. Figs. 176 and 244.)

If we compare an adult Limulus viewed from the neural surface, with Cephal-
aspis seen from the same surface (Figs. 11 and 12), it will be seen that such an
arachnid could be made into an ostracoderm by the union and backward growth

Fic. 22.—Young spider, showing the procephalon, transferred from the neural to the hemal surface, and the loca-
tion of the thoracic appendages, mouth, heart, and respiratory organs. Thoracic appendages removed.

of the anterior margins of the cephalothorax, thus enclosing the mouth and
appendages in a large branchial chamber, like that in some phyllopods (Figs. 9-
10). The eyes and olfactory organs could remain in their original embryonic
position near the center of the head; the olfactory organs in front, the three
parietal ocelli in the center, and the lateral eyes on either side. (Fig. 12.) The
enlarged coxal joints of the anterior thoracic appendages, extending on to the
hemal surface, would form the visceral arches about the mouth, the free append-
ages forming the external gills and the jointed, oar-like arms. A varying number
of infolded branchial appendages, similar to the lung books of arachnids, would
initiate the true gill pouches, and finally the elongated post-abdomen would form
the beginning of the flexible trunk, with its pleural or lateral folds, from which
the post-cephalic appendages later arise.

From the cephalaspids we may easily derive the remaining ostracoderms.
In Bothriolepis, the old cephalo-thoracic portion remains comparatively small,
while the abdominal buckler has become greatly enlarged and closed on its neural

32 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

surface to form a true atrial chamber that encloses the gills and cloaca. (Fig. 5.)
The jointed, oar-like appendages, which belong to one of the posterior meso-
cephalic segments, are attached to the angle of the cornua, that are here very small
compared with those of Cephalaspis.

Bothriolepis retains the hinge-like joint in the vagus region, which is such
a prominent feature in trilobites, merostomes, and other arachnids. The same
joint is a conspicuous feature in Dinichthyes, Coccosteus, etc., a group of primitive,
fish-like animals that probably unite the typical ostracoderms with the true
vertebrates. (Fig. 250.)

In Tremataspis (Figs. 236 and 237), there are probably several pairs of
small cephalic appendages, comparable with external gills, that protruded from
the openings on the oral surface; the larger, oar-like pair, at the beginning of the
series, being especially noteworthy. The exhalent branchial currents and the
excretory products, no doubt pass out of the posterior end of the atrial chamber,
as in Bothriolepis.

The assumed changes above described affect, in the main, the external form
of the animal. The internal structure might remain essentially ag it now is in
arachnids, and, except for certain organs, it would harmonize with the structural
plan in vertebrates. For example, it would be necessary, in order to complete the
transformation of an arachnid into a vertebrate, to close the old mouth and to
connect the new one and the gill pouches with the enteron. The factors involved
in these changes are described elsewhere. For the present, it is enough to recog-
nize the fact that these events have taken place, in some way and at some time,
whatever the method or cause may have been.

On the other hand it will be observed that many internal organs, that we are
accustomed to consider as characteristic of vertebrates, are already present in
the arachnids, in their proper position and relations, and merely have to be en-
larged or improved, or even left as they are, to agree with those in vertebrates or
ostracoderms.

For example, there is already present in Limulus, in addition to the brain,
sense organs, and other structures that have been considered, a head kidney,
cox. o., heart, h, aortic arches, a. 0., and cardinal sinuses, card. s. foreshadowing
those in vertebrates. (Fig. 2.) There are infolded gill sacs and gut pouches in
arachnids, that are precursors of the gill clefts, thyroids, and other enteric diver-
ticula in vertebrates. (Figs. 179-182.) There is in Limulus and other arachnids
a large cartilagenous endocranium and gill bars, so similar in form, location, and
histological structure to those of vertebrates, that they might readily pass for
those of some primitive, unknown member of that class. (Figs. 210-220.) There
is, in Limulus, an internal, dermal skeleton, made of chiten, it is true, but never-
theless consisting of a network of trabeculae, cancelle, Haversian canals, lacune,
and canalicule, so much like those of certain ostracoderms (Pteraspis) that it is
doubtful whether fossilized fragments of one skeleton could be distinguished from
those of the other, if their real origin was unknown. (Figs. 196-207.) And

COMPARISON OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS. 33

finally, there is present in all arthropods that have been carefully studied in regard
to this organ, a median, subneural cord agreeing in position, development, and in
some cases in function, with the notochord of vertebrates. (Figs. 221-231.)

It is evident, therefore, that the resemblance in form and general appearance
between the ostracoderms and the marine arachnids is not a fanciful one, to be
classed as a meaningless coincidence, or as due to mimicry, to parallelism, or to
a particular mode of life. The resemblance is real, and pervades the whole
organism, and can be satisfactorily explained only on the assumption that there
isa close genetic relationship between the two classes.

III. ComMpaRIsON OF ARTHROPOD AND OF VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

A comparison of adult arachnids with adult vertebrates helps us to see the
morphological relations that exist between the two types, but it cannot tell us how
one arose from the other. That is the function of comparative embryology, for
the rise of one great class from another takes place during the malleable embry-
onic periods, when transitional stages are created by a slow yielding to the impact
of successive readjustments between organs developing under unequal and un-
stable conditions.

Hence the supreme test of any broad theory of phylogeny is its ability to pre-
sent an unbroken series of embryonic stages, naturally or inevitably leading from
one type to the other, and to point out the efficient causes for them. This embryonic
series should include, at the proper period, the characteristic anatomical structures
of both types. The established direction of growth shown by various systems of
organs, and the general conditions that control growth in the lower type, should
persist in the higher, supplying a past cause for the creation of the fundamental
features of the new type, and a present one for those now appearing in it. There
should be no changes demanded that necessitate the sudden destruction of old
organs, or the abrupt creation of new ones; that interrupt the continuity of in-
dividual life, or that break, or entangle, the necessary morphological relations of
one organ to another. This dual embryonic series should run parallel with,
and should supplement and elucidate the series of adult forms left along the trail
made by the two types in their slow process of evolution.

I have made a series of models that show how the embryos of vertebrates and
arachnids conform to these requirements. (Figs. 24-34.) They are intended
to illustrate the principal stages in the development of a primitive vertebrate
supposed to be descended from arachnids. ‘The series begins as an arachnid
embryo and leads, without any greater changes than are found in the develop-
ment of the higher animals, through the typical embryonic stages of forms like
Limulus and scorpion, into a vertebrate embryo of the fish-like or amphibian type.

The series shows us that the early stages of vertebrate embryos, in all essen-
tial respects, run parallel to, or are identical with, those of arachnids; and that the
same morphogenic forces which created the cephalothorax of arachnids find their
full expression in the head of vertebrates. It shows that both embryos begin

3

34 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

their growth from the same surface of the egg and spread over the yolk in the
same directions, enclosing the opposite side in the same manner; that there has
been no transfer of the nerve cord from one surface to the other, as claimed by
Gaskell, and that the medullary plates in both types are homologous, and not, as
claimed by C. L. Herrick, one dorsal, the other ventral.

Form Controlling Factors in the Early Stages.—Apical growth and the
volume and composition of the yolk sphere are impor-
tant factors in the development of the embryo, because
the physical and chemical composition of the yolk
sphere controls the rate of radial growth, while the
circumference of the yolk sphere, and the ratio
between the rate of apical and bilateral growth, deter-
mines the relative time and place at which certain
organs arise, and the physical conditions under which
they develop. Owing to the relatively large volume
of the yolk sphere in the arachnids, neither the ccelente-
rate nor trochosphere stages can assume the form of
the ancestral, free swimming animal, 7.e., a nearly
spherical body growing in each of three dimensions at
about an equal rate, for they are reproduced in the
arachnid egg under totally different conditions. They
appear at a time when cell growth is beginning on the
outer surface of a relatively large sphere of inert ma-
terial, and the various organs must be mapped out in
one plane, like a Mercator projection of the earth’s
surface. Moreover at these early stages, the develop-

Fic. 23.—Diagram illustrating
a hypothetical, transitional condi-
tion, between the embryo of a
marine arachnid and that of a
primitive vertebrate. It shows the
convergence of procephalon, appen-
dicular arches, and mesodermic
lateral plates around the dorsal
organ to form the cephalic navel,
or the anlage of the hzemostoma.
The uncovered yolk, that is sur-
rounded by the concrescing germ
walls and cardiomeres, constitutes
the belly navel, B. N.

ment of the deeper lying organs is delayed, owing to
the impenetrability of the yolk and the lack of respira-
tory facilities.

Thus all the early stages must be expressed in
the form of a film in which the rate of growth, in the
three dimensions, is very unequal. This film increases
in length by a process of apical growth, which takes
place at one end only; in breadth by bilateral growth,
and in thickness by radial growth. 'These early con-
ditions are identical for all segmented animals, and it

is only necessary to fix the location of the growing apex, and the direction of
bilateral growth, in order to fix, beyond question, the identity of the head and
tail ends and the neural and hemal surfaces.

The Gastrula, Colenterate, or Trochosphere Stage.—The first stage
after cleavage (Fig. 24, A), shows the primitive cumulus, the primary center for the

origin of the germ layers.

The central depression, gst, marks an area of inward

proliferation which gives rise to the endoderm, yolk cells, and procephalic meso-

GASTRULATION AND CONCRESCENCE. 35

derm. This stage represents the radiate or ccelenterate phase, and is to be re-
garded as the true gastrula of the arthropod-vertebrate stock. The central de-
pression deepens and later forms the stomodzum, the outer opening being the
neurostoma. The stomodeum, at a very early period, is enclosed, or surrounded
by a nerve ring consisting of the stomodeal ganglia and their commissures, which
probably represents the remnants of the circumoral nerve ring of the ccelenterates.
The stomodzum is, therefore, caught in a trap, the bars of which are continually
growing stronger, and from which it never escapes.

Transition from Radiate to Bilateral Symmetry.—The blastodisc, or
cell layers covering the primitive cumulus, gradually spreads out over the surface
of the yolk in all directions. Then, on the posterior side of the disc and independ-
ently of the central depression, a second thickening appears, in which cell growth
and proliferation is especially active. It marks the beginning of apical growth
and of bilateral symmetry, and lays the foundations for the first metameres. The
anterior portion of the primitive cumulus gives rise to the procephalic lobes.
(Figs. 24, 25.)

The Telopore.—The rapid cell division at the apex of the developing trunk
may give rise either to an elongated axial groove (insects), or to a terminal in-
folding, or telopore (arachnids), the so-called ‘“‘blastopore” of authors. Later
it may be changed to a typical primitive streak (Limulus and scorpion), or there
may be no infolding whatever (Cymothoa). This axial or terminal ingrowth
(Fig. 25), is not to be regarded as a modification, or as an extension of the process
of gastrulation in the procephalic lobes. It is merely a local exaggeration of the
marginal growth of the blastodisc. The infolding is a secondary result of the
rapid tangential proliferation that takes place at the head of the comet-like out-
growth. It may or may not be present.

The Germ Wall.—At the close of the primitive cumulus stage, a germ wall,
g. w., is formed on the lateral and posterior margins of the blastodisc. With the
formation of the trunk, it forms the lateral boundaries of the developing metameres.
(Figs. 25, 26). The germ wall, which is merely a thick band of proliferating
cells, similar to the teloblasts at the caudal end, spreads laterally over the yolk
surface (Figs. 31, 32), leaving behind, in addition to the ectoderm and yolk
cells, a sheet of underlying mesoderm that gradually breaks up into somites and
lateral plates.

Differentiation, therefore, takes place along two main axes; from the mediam
line laterally, and from the head end backward; hence the anterior median part
of the germinal area, which now includes the primitive head and the new body,.
is always the oldest and shows the greatest histological differentiation; the marginall
and caudal part is the youngest and is the least differentiated. .

Concrescence of the Germ Wall.—As the gradually widening germinal.
area advances over the yolk, the germ walls of the more posterior segments form
a A, the arms of which gradually unite, forming a double, primitive streak-like
band of nuclei behind the telopore. (Figs. 16, 21, 25, 26, 27, 138.)

36 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

canv, ~

Fics. 24 to 34.—A hypothetical series of arachnid and vertebrate embryos. The purpose of the series is to
show the continuity in the methods of growth and organic differentiation in vertebrates and arachnids. It begins
with the typical arachnid stages and leads up to those characteristic of primitive vertebrates, where without inter-
ruption they are carried on to completion.

Fic. 24.—A_ shows the radially symmetrical germ disc, or primitive cumulus, with its centrally located gas-
trula ingrowth; B, beginning of apical, or teloblastic, growth, and the appearance of bilateral symmetry; C, the
formation of the medullary plate; the unequal expansion of the thickened margin of the germ disc, or germ wall,
g. w., and the infolding of the teloblast to form the telopore, ¢. p.

Fic, 25.—The open medullary plate stage, with its neural crests, the marginal infoldings that mark the beginning of
the forebrain vesicle, and the forebrain sense organs on the outer slope of the neural crest.

Fic. 26.—Shows the appearance of the thoracic appendages; the segmentation of the lateral plate mesoderm
in the abdomial region; the beginning of the postanal concrescence of the germ wall; and the infoldings for the
middle cord, or notochord. The telepore is replaced by a primitive streak.

Fic. 27.—Shows the appearance of the gustatory lobes, the vagus and abdominal appendages, and the eleva-
tion of the caudal lobe. The olfactory organs have moved forward, in front of the head, and the median eyes
have been transferred to the inner limb of the neural crest. The cerebellum appears as the suprastomodezal
commissure.

Fic. 28.—The palial fold has covered nearly the whole of the forebrain, and the optic ganglia are crowded
backward and upward toward the oral region. The pleural folds appear, and the thoracic folds, or the thoracic
shield, extend over the posterior thoracic appendages, forming the beginning of the opercular or branchial fold.

Fic. 29.—The optic ganglia have united over the stomodzeum to form the tectum opticum. The neural crests
of the branchial region have closed, except over the mouth which lies just behind the stomodeal commissure, or
cerebellum. The uncovered space marks the location of the choroid plexus of the fourth ventricle.

GASTRULATION AND CONCRESCENCE. 37

Fic. 30.—The embryo now presents typical vertebrate conditions. The old mouth is practically closed. The
posterior thoracic and vagus appendages appear as the external gills, and the pleural fold as the postcephalic
lateral fold that gives rise to the pectoral and pelvic appendages.

Fics, 31 and 32.—Side views of Figs. 26 and 27, showing the extension of the germ wall over the yolk, and the
elevation of the procephalic lobes above the general level of the yolk.

Fic, 33.—Side view of Fig. 29. It shows the projection of the procephalic lobes beyond the anterior surface
of the yolk, thus allowing the oral arches, or the basal arches of the anterior thoracic appendages, to approach
the hzemal surface of the forehead. The lateral eye has been carried into the brain vesicles, appearing through the
skin as the kidney-shaped retina.

Fic. 34.—Side view of Fig. 30. At least four pairs of oral arches have united on the hamal suface, giving rise
to the premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular. and hyoid arches. Vestiges of the free appendages persist as the
orai arch papilla, tentacles, or balancers. The large thoracic segmental sense organ opposite the fourth thoracic
appendage and behind the hyoid arch has now become the auditory placode.

3 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

Thus the embryo elongates, apparently, in two different ways; by true apical
growth at the original apex of the embryo, and by the concrescence of the adjacent
parts of the germ wall, behind the apex. Failure to recognize the meaning of
these two processes in vertebrates has led to much confusion.

As the telopore is merely a locally exaggerated marginal growth, its products
are not primarily different from those of the germ walls that concresce behind it.
But it will be observed that in their derivation and in their serial arrangement,
the two sets of products stand in totally different relations to one another, and to
their surroundings. (Figs. 138, 157.)

In vertebrates, as well as in arachnids, neither the telopore, nor the concres-
cing margins of the germ wall have anything to do with a true gastrula, nor is their
mode of growth comparable with the coelenterate method of gut formation. As
indicated elsewhere, post-anal concrescence is the inevitable result when a living
film, extending by apical and marginal growth, spreads over a spherical surface.

The Nervous System follows in the paths first laid down by the expanding
germ layers. The procephalic lobes, developing from the territory of the primi-
tive cumulus, and the lateral nerve cords on either side of the line of apical growth.
A slipper-shaped medullary plate is thus formed that in both arthropod and verte-
brate embryos has essentially the same structure, location, and mode of growth.
In both types we may recognize the marginal sense organs of the procephalic
lobes and the central, stomodzal infolding. This infolding, with a rostrum-like
elevation on its anterior margin, is frequently a conspicuous marking in the middle
of the cephalic lobes of amphibia (Rana, and Necturus) (Fig. 25.)

In this stage, the olfactory lobes make their appearance as a deep fold across
the anterior border, and the edges of the neural crest begin to grow overthe
lateral margins of the medullary plate. A little later, the thoracic appendages
appear as gill arches and external gills. (Figs. 26-28.)

The Primary Sense Organs.—In the following stages (Figs. 27-34), the
primary sense organs on the margins of the cephalic lobes move into, or toward,
their final position, and the gustatory organs make their appearance on the inner
margins of the basal lobes of the thoracic appendages. The olfactory organs,
ol, 0, move toward the anterior median line but remain in the surface ectoderm,
outside the brain chamber; the two pairs of ocelli are caught in the palial
fold and carried onto the membranous roof of the brain vesicle to form the parietal
eye; the kidney-shaped lateral eyes lie on the outer edge of the fold, not quite
inside of the brain chamber. (Fig. 27.)

Meantime the cornua, c, of the thoracic shield and the edges of the abdominal
pleurites appear. (Figs. 28, 33.)

The hemal side of the cephalothorax is unsegmented. The greatly thickened
germ wall in this region concentrates around a point between the anterior end of
the heart and the forebrain, where a great mass of cells, the remnants of the
hemal blastoderm, are engulfed in the yolk and absorbed. (Fig. 33, c.nav.)

Vertebrate Stages.—Up to this point, our vertebrate-arachnid embryo has

CHARACTERISTIC VERTEBRATE STAGES. 39

been passing through the ccelenterate and arthropod stages of its development, the
later ones, as we have represented them, being essentially like those of Limulus and
the scorpion, although not presenting any characters foreign to a vertebrate. In
the following stages, the vertebrate characters appear.

The changes that most affect the general shape and appearance of the brain
are the transfer of the lateral eye placodes to the inside of the cerebral vesicle,
and the union of the optic ganglia over the neural surface of the brain to form the
ganglion habenule and the tectum opticum, or optic lobes. (Fig. 28.) As the
latter increase in size, they crowd the stomodeal commissure and its ganglion
backward, over the posterior part of the midbrain region, where they form the
rudiment of the cerebellum. (Figs. 29, 30, 107 and 108.)

When the convex, kidney-shaped lateral eye placode is transferred to the
brain wall, it becomes a concave, horseshoe-shaped retina. Still later, it becomes
a circular one, with a median fissure and centrally located nerve, both conditions
being the direct result of its ancestral shape and mode of growth. (Fig. 106.)

The Auditory Pit develops from a prominent, disc-like placode, or segmental
sense organ, which in Limulus lies on the cephalothoracic shield, opposite the
third or fourth thoracic segment. (Figs. 29-30.) With the concrescence of the
anterior oral arches on the hemal side of the head, the disc shifts its position to
that part of the head where it makes its first appearance in vertebrate embryos.
(Figs. 33-34.)

The Heart has been formed in typical arthropod fashion, by the concrescence
of the lateral plates of the vagus, and the anterior abdominal metameres, which
accounts for the fact that, in both arthropods and vertebrates, the anterior heart
nerves arise from the corresponding vagus and branchial neuromeres. (Figs. 32
and 33.)

In the formation of the vertebrate heart, new factors may arise in the greatly
increased volume of the yolk sphere. In this case the branchial metameres, lying
near the equator of the egg, must extend their lateral plates completely round the
yolk before a heart segment can be formed. Hence, in the larger yolked eggs, it
is only the vagal and anterior branchial metameres that are in a position to form
heart segments in time to nourish the growing head structures. If the younger
and shorter caudal metameres produced heart segments, they would necessarily
arise later and would be separated from the head by the barrier of the abdominal
yolk navel. (Fig. 34.) The heart would then be a single tube at either end and
a paired tube in the middle. (Figs. 23, 139,C.)

The thoracic, and the post branchial cardiomeres have been eliminated in
vertebrates, as they have been in arachnids, and the heart develops, as nearly as
one may determine, from about the same group of vagus and branchial metameres
in both cases. But the posterior end of the vertebrate heart still extends partly
round the yolk navel; hence the divided posterior end and divergent vitelline
veins; and it is crowded into an area on the hemal surface that is growing shorter
while the heart is growing larger, hence the auriculo-ventricular curvature.

40 OUTLINE OF THE ARACHNID THEORY.

The Cornua of the cephalothoracic shield are retained as the opercular
fold, which extends over the posterior appendages, as suggested for Cepha-
laspis, to form a respiratory, or atrial chamber. The projecting margins of the
abdominal segments or pleurites are retained as the lateral fold, from which the
paired, post-branchial appendages arise. (Figs. 29-34.)

The Oral Arches and the Hemostoma.—Both the formation of the
hemostoma, or new mouth, and the transfer of the basal joints of the anterior
thoracic appendages to the hemal side of the head to form the oral arches, are
the inevitable results of the processes that have been steadily going on during the
phylogeny of the arachnid cephalothorax. ‘These processes are: the increased
size of the yolk sphere; the increased size of the forebrain neuromeres; and the
progressive degeneration of the cephalic mesoderm. The way in which these
changes affect the location of the jaws and the shape of the head, during the early
stages of development, is shown in Figs. 31-34. It will be seen that as the fore-
brain increases in volume and in precocity, the apex of the head is elevated and
thrust forward off the surface of the egg. As the hemal ends of these anterior
metameres are greatly reduced in volume, or absent, the other head structures,
which were originally neural or lateral in position, such as the anterior meso>
blastic somites and the appendages, are drawn toward the hemal side of the head.
Here they converge around the ingrowing, hemal surface, or cephalic navel
(dorsal organ) that represents the beginning of the buccal infolding, the basal
joints of the appendages forming the beginning of several pairs of oral arches, i.c.,
premaxille, maxilla, mandibles, and hyoids.

The more posterior arches are not subject to these conditions; hence they
tend to remain in their original position on the neural or lateral surface. But
in the later stages of the higher vertebrates, even they may be transferred to the
hemal surface. (Figs. 307, 308.)

The mouth parts of our embryo are now in the ostracoderm and cyclostome
stage, one that is seen temporarily in all higher vertebrate embryos (see develop-
ment of the jaws in the frog) (p. 257), and permanently in the adult cyclostomes
and ostracoderms. (Figs. 159-174.) The true vertebrate condition is attained
by the union of two pairs of arches to form a single, fixed, upper jaw, and the
union of a third pair to form a movable, unpaired, under jaw, or mandible.

* ok of * o ok k * *

The older stages of our arachnid-vertebrate embryo, Fig. 34, are character-
ized by an increase of the cranial flexure, bringing the heart close under the
anterior end of the brain, and producing that forward dislocation of the hypo-
branchial muscles, so characteristic of vertebrates; by the opening of the gut pouches
into the lung-books; by the appearance of true vertebrate appendages as _post-
cephalic outgrowths of the marginal fold; by the increasing size of the cartilage
cranium and gill bars; by the substitution of a subdermal skeleton for an epidermal
one, and by the conversion of the arthropod lematochord into the notochord.

CHAPTER III.

EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

I. MEANING OF THE TERM BRAIN.

In the vertebrates, the term “brain” vaguely signifies the specialized an-
terior end of the neuron. In the invertebrates, the term may be even more vague,
in that it is often used to signify only that part assumed to lie originally in front
of the cesophagus, that is, the supra-cesophageal ganglion. Or the term may
signify that ganglion, plus a varying number of post-oral neuromeres.

The lack of precise definition in both cases is significant, and justifies the use
of the term, as we shall use it here, namely, to signify a varying number of neuro-
meres consolidated in the region of the primitive mouth.

The number of neuromeres thus set apart, their specialization, and the
intimacy of their union, gradually increases throughout the arthropod-vertebrate
series, and furnishes an impressive picture of persistent, progressive specializa-
tion.

In the arthropods, there are many oscillations in the total number, and in
the grouping, of the brain neuromeres. The primary causes of their union are
too complex to be analyzed, except in the broadest way; but we may readily recog-
nize a steady progression toward a definitely organized collection of neuromeres
that it is entirely proper to call a brain in the vertebrate sense, for it contains
approximately the same total number of neuromeres as the vertebrate brain; and
it is divided into similar groups of neuromeres, each of which is associated with
nerves, sense organs, and other structures similar to those in vertebrates.

_ The evolution of the brain cannot be effectively studied apart from the body
regions to which it belongs, for each moulds the other and reflects the other’s
changes. The events that created the vertebrate brain, and whose influence is
still effective in moulding its form and function, are to be found in the arthropods.
There, all the initial phases in the successive incorporation of one region of the
trunk after another into a more complex “head,” and of one part of the cord after
another into a more and more complex “brain,” have taken place, and probably
nearly all the more important steps in the process are there crystallized into
recognizable form.

The five groups of neuromeres included in the first fifteen or twenty that
make up the vertebrate brain may be definitely identified with the corresponding
divisions of the arthropod brain. We cannot hope to identify more than that

4I

42 EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

since those that follow and which make up the greater part of the spinal cord were
acquired after the evolution of vertebrates from arachnids had taken place.

In other words, the ancestors of vertebrates were animals provided with a
comparatively small number of neuromeres, 21+, most of which had already
been consolidated into a complex brain of the vertebrate type. One of the im-
portant events in the early evolution of the new or vertebrate type was the rapid
increase in the number of metameres by the regular process of apical growth.
The new metameres formed a new trunk or body, while nearly the whole of the
old arachnid trunk (head, thorax, and abdomen, 14-16 metameres) was still
further consolidated to form the head of the new type. The whole process thus

Fic. 35.—Diagrams to explain the probable relations between the structure of a trochosphere and the early
embryonic stages of a primitive arthropod; A, Trochosphere in mercator projection, seen from the neural, or sub-
umbrella surface; C, same from the side seen as a solid object; B, early stage of an arthropod embryo, seen in
mercator projection; D, same seen as a solid object, from the side. In A and C, the circumoral area, with its
system of radial and circular nerves, forms a part of the sub-umbrella of the trochosphere. In B and D this area
is supposed to be infolded, giving rise to the proximal portion of the stomodeum, from which the system of stomo-
deal nerves and ganglia arise. The ancestral coelenterate body, according to this interpretation, is represented in
the arthropod embryo by the procephalic lobes and stomodeum; the arthropod trunk, with its lateral and
median nerve cords, is a new formation, arising as a local outgrowth from the ancestral ccelenterate body, or from
the procephalic lobes of the arthropod embryo, On the aboral surface of the trochosphere is the area of yolk de-
posit and the “closing in’’ point, a pauperitic, degenerative region that is called the cephalic navel.

presents a striking analogy to the way in which the primitive body of segmented
animals was formed as a new outgrowth from the body of its ccelenterate ancestor,
which then became the head of its descendant. (Fig. 35.)

* * * * * * 2k * *

II. THe Stomop#sAL NERVES.

We recognize two distinct systems of nerves in segmented animals. One
belongs to the stomodeum, and probably represents the remnants of the cir-
cular and radial sub-umbrellar nerves of a coelenterate-like ancestor; the other
consists of longitudinal and transverse nerves that developed in the tentacle-like
out-growth that gave rise to the body of the new animal. (Fig. 35.)

The stomodzum is looked upon as representing, in part, the infolded sub-
umbrella. When invaginated, it carried with it the primitive system of circum-
oral nerves, which then arise as circular and longitudinal nerves from the walls
of the stomodeum. The outermost circular nerve (prototroch nerve(?)), is repre-

THE BRAIN. 43

sented by the supra-stomodeal commissure with its anterior median, and two
lateral, ganglia. These nerves and ganglia are without doubt very ancient
structures, and their position and mode of development clearly indicate that they
belong to a different system of nerves from those in the remaining part of the head
or trunk.

There is probably a distinct post-cesophageal ganglion and commissure
belonging to this system, although I have not succeeded in locating it, or in dis-
tinguishing it from the more anterior post-oral commissures. The supra-stomo-
deal commissure always sends nerves to the labrum, or rostrum, which receives
nerves from this source only. The innervation of this pair of appendages, their
median position in front of the mouth, and between the right and left halves of
the forebrain, distinguish them from all others, and indicate their probable origin
from tentacle-like organs of some very remote ancestor.

Originally the stomodzal ne1ves appear to have been intimately connected
with the two median longitudinal nerves of the trunk, 7.e., with the median cardiac,
on the hemal side, and the median sympathetic on the neural. Both these con-
nections are lost in the adults of the higher arachnids, 7.e., in Limulus, although
in the scorpion the connection with the cardiacs seems to be retained.

The dividing line between the ccelenterate nervous system of the primitive
head and that belonging to the bilateral outgrowth from it, cannot be accurately
determined, and indeed there is no reason to suppose the two were ever distinct
systems, the post-oral nerves being merely extensions of the older ones in
the head.

III. Tue FRAME-WORK OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM.

The nervous system of segmented animals may be reduced to a system of
longitudinal and transverse strands or cords.

Longitudinal Cords.—In the arachnids, eight longitudinal nerve cords may
be recognized: a median hemal one, from which arises the cardiac ganglion; a
median neural one,.or middle-cord (Mittelstrang of Hatschek), from which arises
the so-called median sympathetic nerve; a pair of ventral cords, which give rise
to the main axial nervous system, or neuron (brain and spinal cord); the paired
pericardials; and the lateral sympathetics.

The Median Nerve, “ Median Sympathetic,” or “ Middle-Cord,” of arthropods
appears to have extended backward, from the posterior part of the cesophageal
region, or of the circumoral nerve ring, the whole length of the body. I have not
been able to determine the peripheral distribution of its fibers. ‘The main nerve
and its sheath undergo many modifications. In the higher arthropods and verte-
brates, the nerve itself atrophies and ceases to form a functional part of the nervous
system. It serves, however, as a center for the development of voluminous,
resistent envelopes from which is evolved the notochord. The history of the middle
chord will therefore be described in the chapter on the evolution of the notochord

44 EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

Transverse Cords.—Numerous transverse, or circular bands intersect the
longitudinal ones, and lay the foundations for the transverse commissures, and
for the segmental peripheral nerves. The latter usually lead by smaller branches
into a subdermal plexus, from which the nerve ends are distributed to their re-
spective terminals.

The ventral cords and the middle cord are confined to that surface of the
embryo that is the first to develop. Their position during the early stages is the
same in all segmented animals, and their presence definitely locates the primitive
oral, or neural surface of the body.

oe : \
W Patten de ' al ce von
pe c*

Fic. 36.— Brain and nerve cord of a young Limulus in the second larval stage. A, Hamal surface; B, neural surface.

Fic. 37.—Sections of same, A, Through the optic ganglia and olfactory organs; B, through the middle of the
hemispheres and the posterior part of the forebrain; D, through the cheliceral ganglia; FE, through the suprasto-
modeal commissure and the lateral stomodeal ganglia.

fi tg
e

The longitudinal cords serve to conduct nervous impulses in a longitudinal
direction; in them are located the great majority of the nerve cells. The trans-
verse bands serve to conduct nervous impulses in a centripetal or centrifugal
direction. The comparatively few nerve cells that belong in them, as a rule, lie
near their central or peripheral terminals.

THE SPECIALIZATION OF THE NERVE CORDS. “45

The Process of Specialization.—The axial or central nervous system under-
goes progressive evolution, or specialization, in a transverse and in a longitudinal
direction.

The first process consists in the segregation of similar nerve fibers and cells
into concentric, overlying longitudinal zones or tracts, the most notable example
of this being the assembling of motor elements toward the hemal surface, and
of sensory ones toward the neural surface of the cords.

The second is the transverse division of the cords into blocks, or neuromeres,
which then, singly or in groups, become the centers of some particular function.
The linear specialization of the neuron is due to the gradual elimination of the
heart, digestive and locomotor organs, from the anterior body metameres, and to
the increased size of the sensory and ingestive organs. These changes lead to a
great reduction in the number and volume of the motor nerve elements in the
anterior metameres, and to the location of functional centers in the neuromeres
according to a definite order, which follows that established in the corresponding
groups of metameres. See page 209. This order, which is initiated at a very
early period in the history of segmented animals, is as follows: olfactory; coordinat-
ing; visual; ingestive (i.e., masticatory, swallowing, and gustatory); auditory;
locomotory; respiratory (cardiac and branchial); digestive, and urogenital.
This process of cephalization progresses in a cephalo-caudal direction, the func-
tional centers becoming more and more sharply localized in the direction and
order named above.

IV. THE DIFFERENTIATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVES.

The primary system of transverse nerves forms the foundation ofthe peri-
pheral nervous system. The evolution of these nerves consists mainly in the
resolution of the primary network into special nerve bundles composed of fibers
having similar central and peripheral terminals. _

The principal stages of the process appear to beas follows: 1. Each neuromere
is at first connected with several pairs (four?) of transverse nerves, all of which
may contain both motor and sensory elements. 2. The number of nerves for
each neuromere is ultimately reduced to two main pairs, an anterior anda posterior.
3. The roots of the anterior nerves gradually shift toward the neural surface of
the cord; the posterior ones retain a more hemal position. The two series of
nerves thus formed, are called the neural and the hemal nerves. 4. The neural
nerves develop ganglia on their proximal ends, and in those regions of the body
where appendages are developed, supply only the appendages. The hemal
nerves are without ganglia and supply the remaining parts of the metamere. 5.
In the cephalothoracic, or head region, the neural and hemal nerves remain
separate (vertebrates and arthropods), while in the more posterior regions they
may unite, for a longer or shorter distance, forming single nerves with two sets of
roots, ganglionated neural roots, and non-ganglionated hemal roots. 6. Both
neural and hemal nerve roots contain motor and sensory elements, but at an

46 EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

early period in the evolution of arthropods the sensory elements become more and
more predominant in the neural nerves, and the motor elements in the hemal ones,
this condition being most strongly marked at the anterior end, and diminishing:
gradually in a caudal direction.

Factors that Modify the Arrangement of Peripheral Nerves.-—The more:
important factors that modify the primitive segmental arrangement of peripheral
nerves are as follows: a. the location, isolation, and size of the peripheral terminals;:
b. the elimination of other terminals; c. the organic union of similar terminals:
belonging to different metameres; d. the relative age of the metamere in which they

belong.

Fic. 38.—Brain of a young Limulus about three Fic. 39.—Same; hamal surface.
inches long; neural surface,

a. The segregation of like nerve fibers into peripheral nerves, or into nerve
tracts in the central nervous system, is determined by the time and place of origin
of the peripheral terminals.

Wherever there are highly specialized organs, morphologically isolated, the
associated nerve fibers and nerve cells show a similar isolation or segregation, the
growth of each correlated part keeping pace, in the main, with the growth of
the other. The primary sensory organs are superficial in position and lie in the
ectoderm, close to the lateral margins of the neuron. The motor ones are deeper,
more lateral or hemal in position. ‘The corresponding nerves have, in the main,
similar relative positions, and these factors have controlled from the outset the

THE ARRANGEMENT OF PERIPHERAL NERVES. 47

segregation of motor components in a hemal direction, and the sensory ones in a
neural direction, both as regards their location in the peripheral nerves and in
the central nervous system. With the invagination of the nerve cords, these con-
ditions were still further exaggerated by the union of the neural crests in the median
dorsal line, and by the position of the mesoblastic somites. (Fig. 137.)

The wide separation of the neural and hemal nerves, as for example in the
thorax of Limulus and the scorpion, is due on the one hand to the location and spe-
cialization of the appendages, coxal sense organs and ganglia, and on the other to the
location of the more peripheral trunk muscles and sense organs. It no doubt
had its origin at a very early period in the evolution of metameres.

b. Elimination.—In the arthropods there is a progressive elimination from
the anterior metameres of the motor, nutritive, cardiac, and respiratory organs,
leaving little but the leg and jaw muscles, and the primary sense organs, such as
the eyes, olfactory, gustatory, auditory, and tactile organs. The nerve elements
associated with those organs disappear with them. Those that remain increase
in volume and independence with their corresponding peripheral terminals, while
their central terminals tend to completely monopolize their appropriate neuro-
meres. In this way the primitive character of the segmental nerves may be lost or
greatly modified. This is the case in the procephalon, where the only peripheral
nerves that remain belong to the eyes and olfactory organs, all other peripheral
elements having been eliminated, if they ever existed there.

c. Union.—Where organs belonging to different metameres perform the same
function their nerves tend to unite, forming a common bundle, or nerve, or tract.
Such compound nerves, consisting of the united branches of separate segmental
nerves, may themselves simulate independent segmental nerves, and greatly dis-
guise the original segmental arrangement.. Examples of this mode of segregation
are seen in the segmental cardiacs, the hypobranchial, the intestinal (Figs. 57, 58),
and to a lesser degree, the gustatory nerves of Limulus.

c. Historic Factor.—If{ we attempt to homologize the nerves in one part of
the head with those in another, or with those in the trunk, we meet with insuper-
able difficulties because, as we have seen, each group of metameres has a history
of its own that is different from that of all the others, and this history is reflected
in the structure of its nerves and neuromeres. The attempt to homologize the
structures in the head with those in the trunk or tail, except in the most general
way, is an illogical and hopeless undertaking, for the caudal metameres belong
to later generations that came into existence under new conditions and were
provided with different organs from those in the old. Except fora small number
of the most anterior ones, the trunk and caudal metameres of vertebrates did not
exist in the arthropods. They arose with the vertebrate stock and never developed
any organs comparable with the cephalic appendages, jaws, gill arches, or visual
organs. Hence it is clear that there can be no exact homology between the head
metameres of an arachnid or a vertebrate and a trunk metamere of the same
animal. For that reason, therefore, we may not consider the cranial nerves, or

48 EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

cranial neuromeres, or cephalic sense organs, as modifications of those in the
trunk, or vice versa, without conveying an entirely false impression of their real

history and meaning.
* * * * * * * * *

In the lower arthropods, the peripheral nerves are generally arranged through-
out the whole body, in typical segmental fashion. In the higher arachnids, due
to the operation of the above described factors, this clear cut metamerism declines,
or is greatly obscured. The broad distinction between cranial and spinal nerves
becomes clearly established, and the extensive elimination of motor elements, as
well as the local segregation of sensory and motor components of different nerves

A

Fic. 40.—Models of the brain of a young scorpion, just hatched. A, Hemal surface; B, neural surface.

into compound nerves having a similar function and distribution, has given to the
entire system the same structure and general arrangement of parts seen in the
vertebrates.

In Limulus, for example, this process of specialization has produced the
highly characteristic olfactory, pineal eye, and lateral eye nerves, as well as the
compound system of gustatory, branchio-thoracic (hypoglossal), cardiac, and
intestinal nerves. These nerves are already so complex and highly modified
that the original segmental arrangement is now exceedingly difficult or impossible
accurately to determine.

The same conditions, but in a still more exaggerated form, are seen in verte-
brates, and in part justifies the revolt of certain American neurologists against the
apparently hopeless task of determining the segmental value of vertebrate cranial
nerves and their relation to the dorsal or ventral roots of spinal nerves. They
have laid great stress on the analysis of nerves into their functional components;
but in perfecting a highly artificial system, they have neglected the deeper mor-
phological problems involved in their more primitive segmental arrangement. It
is clear that both the old and the new method must be retained. But neither

THE EVOLUTION OF NEUROMERES. 49

method alone applied to the vertebrates can ever give us a true picture of their
ancestral condition. That can only be obtained from the arthropods where the
highly specialized condition seen in the vertebrates has its origin.

V. NEUROMERES AND METAMERISM.

Metamerism of the body and the subdivision of nerve cords into blocks or
neuromeres are characters that were probably slowly evolved in bilateral animals;
not inherited, even in a rudimentary form, from ccelenterate ancestors.

The evolution of neuromeres probably began in the trochozoa. They are
well developed in the annelids and in the arthropods, especially in the ab-
dominal regions. In the higher arthropods, the clear-cut distinction between
adjacent neuromeres of the head is greatly obscured by their fusion into larger
groups, and by the segregation of their constituents into new groups, according

Fic. 41 —Model of the forebrain region of an embryo scorpion, stage G, Fig. 18.

to their function. In vertebrates, the post-cephalic part of the neuron, which
has been more recently acquired, and which is not represented in arthropods,
is never divided into distinct neuromeres, and probably never was so divided.

Even in the arthropods and annelids, it is doubtful whether there is any such
thing as a neuromere, complete in itself and devoted to a single body joint or
metamere. There are certainly none in Limulus, or in the scorpion, and the
lower down we go, as for example into the phyllopods, the less sharply defined the
neuromeres become; that is, the ganglionic masses are more diffuse, and the pe-
ripheral nerves more numerous, and not so strictly segmental in their origin or dis-
tribution (Branchipus).

In Limulus and scorpion, where there appears to be such an exact and exclu-
sive association of the body segment with its neuromere and nerves, there is no
such exclusive association in fact, because many motor neuromeres and the cen-
tral ends of many sensory fibers are located in some neuromere anterior to the one
where the nerve fibers leave the cord to reach their peripheral terminals. That

a

5° EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

is, the central nerve terminals and the centrally located nerve cells, in many cases
lie in different metameres from the peripheral organs with which they are asso-
ciated. (Figs. 59, 60.)

This condition appears to prevail in the most primitive arthropod neuro-
meres, hence that complete functional and morphological correspondence, sup-
posed to occur between a body joint and a nerve cord joint, does not exist. Meta-
merism has developed to a different degree in the two systems and affects them
in quite a different manner. The morphological segmentation of the nerve
axis does not coincide with that of the body, and the functional segmentation of the
nerve cord does not coincide with its morphological segmentation, for both motor
nerve cells and sensory dendrites are frequently located in a neuromere in front
of the metamere in which the corresponding nerve fibers leave the cord, and in
which they have their peripheral terminals.

A partial explanation of the lack of correspondence between functional and
morphological metamerism of the nerve cord is afforded by what takes place in
embryo scorpions. Here each neuromere is composed of two distinct segments,
and as the space between the abdominal ones increases, the anterior segment of
one neuromere unites with the posterior segment of the one in front of it, thus
completely changing the original grouping of the half neuromeres. It is not
clear whether this takes place in Limulus or in the other arthropods I have
studied, but it probably does, otherwise it is hard to understand how the cell
bodies of the motor neurones are located in the neuromeres in front of the one
from which the corresponding motor nerves leave the cord.

It is therefore clear that Loeb’s attempt to prove that each abdominal neuro-
mere in Limulus is a complete reflex center for its corresponding gill, is based on a
misconception of the structure of the nerve cord. His interpretations of his ex-
periments are incorrect because, as we shall show later, they are based on a
misunderstanding of the structure of a neuromere and the distribution of its nerves.

VI. THE PRIMITIVE SENSE Bubs.

The main nerve trunks in the arthropods represent bands of metamorphosed
sense organs, and they coincide with the lines along which such sense organs
were distributed in the remote ancestral forms. The transformation of these
primitive sense organs into nerve cells constitutes an important step in the evolu-
tion of the central nervous system. Many details in this process are still retained
in the embryos of arachnids.

In the scorpion, the entire brain and cord is an aggregate of innumerable,
closely packed sense buds which, under a low power, produce a mottled, or pitted
appearance that is very characteristic. (Figs. 15 and 16.) Under a higher
power, and in sections, each bud appears pear-shaped, with a goblet-shaped cavity
opening to the exterior at one end, and leading into a narrow vertical canal at the
other. They consist of typical sensory cells, having the same shape, arrangement,

THE PRIMITIVE SENSE BUDS. 51

and rod-like ends as those in the segmental sense organs on the outer margins of
the coxe. (Fig. 74, E.)

The primitive sense buds appear as soon as the six thoracic appendages are
outlined (stage B), and are at first uniformly distributed over the entire cord and
cephalic lobes, with the sole exception of the olfactory lobes. (Fig. 15.) At
a later stage, Z, those on the lateral margin of the cord are distinctly larger than
the rest, forming two dark bands. From the buds on the posterior lateral margin
of each neuromere, arise the ganglion cells at the roots of the post-thoracic nerves
(spinal ganglia). The buds on the smaller, or originally posterior segment of
the neuromere give rise to the cluster of motor nerve cells which are found near
the anterior nerve roots.

gi An

Ty

Fic. 42.—Brain of adult scorpion, from the side.

As development proceeds, the central cavity of the bud closes, the sensory
cells lose their cylindrical form, and their hair-like, or rod-like outer ends disap-
pear; finally each bud forms a small cluster of ganglion cells.

In the late embryonic stages of the scorpion, the metamorphosed sense buds
form long conical masses of cells with the proliferating apices directed inward.
Their appearance is then much like the cell clusters formed by neuroblasts.
(Figs. 227-228.)

Cell division in the sense buds diminishes after their metamorphosis, the
ganglion cells reaching an approximately fixed number at an early embryonic
period. This, however, does not apply to the minute cells in the hemispheres,
in the olfactory lobes, or in the pedal ganglia of Limulus, for these cells appear
to increase in number steadily, at least as long as the animal continues to grow
in size.

In Limulus the cells descended from a given sense bud, during the late larval
periods, form well defined clusters of pear-shaped ganglion cells, with a special
neuroglia investment. Each cell of the same cluster appears to project its fibers
along the same path, to the same terminals. (Figs. 61-64.)

In Limulus it has not been possible to identify each nerve-cell cluster with

52 EVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SEGMENTED ANIMALS.

the antecedent sense buds, for the latter are best seen in the embryos of scorpions,
while my most detailed work on the cord has been done on Limulus. But the
conditions in the two animals are so similar that there can be no reasonable doubt
that an arthropod neuromere consists of distinct clusters of nerve cells, each sur-
rounded by a special sheath of neuroglia, each projecting its fibers along the same
paths to the same terminals, and each directly descended from one or more
embryonic sense buds.

In the early stages of the neuron in vertebrates, as in the late stages in the
scorpion, the nerve cells are often arranged in parallel vertical rows, which may
be interpreted in the same manner as in arthropods, that is, as the ontogenetic
remnants of ancestral sense buds.

There are many familiar instances where nerve cells arise from the same
points in the ectoderm as the sensory ones. It is highly probable, in such cases,
that the nerve cells are ultimate phases in the specialization of sense cells. For
example, in Acilius, a few cells of large size leave the embryonic retina at a com-
paratively late stage; they finally join the optic ganglion and become giant nerve
cells, having such a peculiar form and location that they may be readily recognized
through life (Patten). Ganglion cells may also arise from the gustatory epithelium
in Limulus, or from the epithelium of lateral line organs in vertebrates. But in
none of these cases has it been clearly shown, to my knowledge, that a functional
and structurally complete sensory cell is bodily metamorphosed into a ganglion
cell. However, just such a metamorphosis as this does take place in Limulus and
Branchipus, where the large rod-bearing visual cells are converted into true gang-
lion cells, which still retain indications of their primitive grouping into ommatidia
and remnants of the visual rods. (p. 162 and Fig. 109, 1.)

The transformation of well developed sense buds into ganglion cells, as just
described for the neuron of arachnids, is not, therefore, without precedent.

In most arthropods, the primitive sense buds, while undoubtedly present in
some form, are not as well developed as they are in scorpions. Hence certain
authors have failed to recognize their real character, and have interpreted them
as neuroblasts, or even as nutritive folds, or as folds produced by growth pressure.
Such interpretations are untenable. It is true that the sense buds may be repre-
sented by small conical groups of cells, or nuclei, arising from the proliferation of
a single deep-lying cell, or nucleus, or ‘‘neuroblast.’”’ But the formation of these
neuroblasts is to be regarded as an abbreviated method of repeating the sense bud
stage so clearly seen in the scorpion.

Even these neuroblasts may be omitted, or their appearance postponed to a
relatively late embryonic period; the entire cord then has its origin in a few
terminal neuroblasts (or telo-neuroblasts), as in Cymothoa.

CHAPTER IV.

THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.
J. THE PROSENCEPHALON, OR FOREBRAIN.

The fore brain of arthropods is that part of the neuron that usually lies in
front of the stomodeum. In the embryos it is the anterior expansion of the
medullary plate called the procephalic lobes. As nearly all traces of mesoderm
and appendages have disappeared from this region, there is but little evidence
accessible to indicate the presence there of metameres. In many arthropods
the lobes are divided into three main divisions, with no recognizable separation,
at any time, between them and the postoral sections of the nerve cords; hence we

Fic. 43.—Sagittal section of a young scorpion.

may, for the present, regard the main divisions as greatly reduced metameres,
and the central portions as neuromeres.

* ok * k * Be * k ok

Acilius.—The structure of the procephalic lobes is best seen in the embryos
of those insects which lead an active larval existence, as for example in Acilius.
(Fig. 14.) Here they are divided transversely into three similar parts, which
probably represent all there is left of three procephalic metameres. Each meta-
mere is also divided into three parts: a. a median one, representing a forebrain
neuromere, corresponding to the postoral neuromeres; b. a middle part, repre-
senting a segment of the optic ganglion; and c. a lateral one, forming a segment of
the optic plate, each plate containing two ocelli. Between each segment of the
optic ganglion and the optic plate is a deep infolding, 7v.**, which later closes,
covering up the optic ganglia, but leaving the ocelli and neuromeres in their
original position.

53

54 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

A pair of small appendages, ro, lie near the first metamere. Later, they fuse
to form the labrum. The second metamere has no appendages. The third one
is closely associated with the antenne.

From the upper or neural surface of the first (?) and second forebrain neuro-
meres, are developed dense masses of small cells, with deeply stained nuclei, that
give rise to the characteristic mushroom bodies of insects. They may be recog-
nized in apparently all classes of arthropods, attaining enormous size in the ants,
bees, wasps and spiders, and reaching extraordinary dimensions in Limulus.
In structure and function (Limulus), they are true coordinating centers, and
are to be regarded as the earliest stayes in the phyllogenetic development of the
cerebral hemispheres of vertebrates.

Fic. 44.—Sagittal section of a primitive vertebrate embryo, showing the relation of its principal organs to those in
the arachnids; schematic.

In the arachnids, the cephalic lobes differ from those of Acilius: a. in the in-
distinct segmentation of the optic plate, b. in the relatively late appearance of the
segmental sense organs (median, and lateral, eyes, and olfactory organs), and c.
in the peculiar character of the first metamere. Other differences appear later,
as we shall presently indicate.

In the scorpion (Fig. 15), which may be taken as the type, the first metamere
is never divided into neuromere, optic ganglion, and optic plate, but forms at the
outset a deeply grooved transverse band, o/.0. The walls of the infolding contain
minute, deeply stained nuclei, that make it very conspicuous, both in sections and
surface views. The band marks the primitive anterior end of the brain and is the
anlage of the olfactory lobes. The infolding deepens, at first more rapidly at
either end, and ultimately carries the whole lobe below the surface, and back-
ward, underneath the brain. Here it forms a hollow, bilobed transverse band,
conspicuous in all subsequent stages, when the brain is viewed from the hemal
side, but almost entirely concealed below the hemispheres when seen from the
neural side. (Figs. 40-42, 43, 46, 47.)

THE PROSENCEPHALON. 55

The cerebral hemispheres arise as mushroom-like expansions of the
second neuromere. In Limulus, they are very conspicuous in the early stages, and
ultimately grow to an enormous size. They consist of dense masses of minute cells,
with deeply stained nuclei, unlike any othersin the nervoussystem. (Figs. 37 and 38.)

As these cells multiply, the hemispheres project above the surface of the
brain and then mushroom, forming large, overhanging lobes. We may dis-
tinguish anterior, lateral, and posterior lobes, the latter being much the largest.
In addition, there is a large lobe on the median face of each hemisphere. (Figs.
47, B, 48 and 49, g.c.) The hemispheres, throughout life, are connected with the
neural surface of the second neuromere by a thick, vertical stalk, or peduncle,
composed of nerve fibers.

As the hemispheres increase in volume, the
posterior lobe completely overlaps the third neu-
romere, and the lateral and anterior lobes partly
envelop the hemal surface. In the adult, the
hemispheres are irregularly convoluted, and
their median faces are flattened against each
other so that they form a large spherical mass
that has a striking resemblance, in external form,
to the hemispheres of vertebrates. (Figs. 38-48.)

In the scorpion, the hemispheres are much
smaller than in Limulus and are crowded farther
forward by the optic ganglia, which have almost
united in the median line behind them. Later
the whole prosencephalon is bent toward the
heemal surface, through an angle of something
more than go°. (Fig. 47, 4.) When the fore-
brain flexure is completed, about the time of
hatching, the hemispheres lie on the anterior iS: a eae a ee
hemal surface of the procephalon. (Figs. 42 brain, showing the number and grouping

a of the neuromeres, the ventricles, the vagus
and 43, ¢. or #2.) This flexure is very marked iopez and the Joneitudinal gustatory
in All arachnids, 66:-tar 26 kiowh; €xcept. in Ses 204 Mets sclation-ta the-svomedeal

ganglia.
Limulus.

The third neuromere undergoes very little change. It may be recognized for
a considerable period as a separate neuromere whose neural surface is covered
with tufts of large ganglion cells. It is gradually incorporated into the thick
mass of tissue that constitutes the body of the forebrain commissures, and upon
which the hemispheres rest (basal ganglia). (Fig. 46.)

The history of the procephalic sense organs and their nerves and ganglia
will be considered under their appropriate heads.

II. THe DIENCEPHALON.
The diencephalon in arthropods consists of a variable number of neuromeres
surrounding the mouth. The first neuromere following the procephalic lobes
(antennal neuromere of insects, cheliceral neuromere of arachnids) may be re-

56 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

garded as the initial neuromere of this subdivision of the brain. Its large size
and its special relations, on one side with the hemispheres, and on the other with
the stomodezeum and the gustatory organs, lend to this neuromere and those im-

Fic. 46.—Semi-diagrammatic sagittal sections, showing the relations of the principal nerve centers in the
brains of arachnids and vertebrates. A, Embryo scorpion (stage B, Fig. 15); B, embryo scorpion (stage G, Fig. 18);
C, hypothetical intermediate condition, based on the conditions in both scorpion and Limulus. The embryonic
palium and the anterior neuropore have been carried over into the adult, and the lateral eye ganglia have been pro-
jected onto the neural surface, otherwise the typical arachnid conditions remain essentially unmodified. D shows
the probable position and relation of these parts in a vertebrate. The ventricles are indicated in Roman numerals,
the neuromeres in Arabic numerals.

mediately associated with it in the circumoral region, a special distinction that
justifies their elevation to the rank of a distinct brain region.

* * * * * * * * *

In the scorpion (Figs. 15, 16, 43), by the time the embryo hatches, the fore-
brain is bent through something more than go°, onto the anterior hemal surface

THE DIENCEPHALON. 57

of the egg. The angle of this bend lies behind the cheliceral neuromere, which,
therefore, faces forward, connecting the forebrain, now on the hemal surface of the
egg, with the thoracic neuromeres on the neural surface. (Figs. 43-46.)

In practically all adult arachnids, the cheliceree move forward to the very an-
terior end of the head and lie close together in front of the rostrum and stomo-
dzeum, instead of behind them, as in the earlier stages. The result is that the
cheliceral nerves, instead of arising from the sides of the brain, like all the other

gn, Sf

Fic. 47.—Sagittal sections of brain models. A, young scorpion; B, Limulus; C, a hypothetical brain, combining
the principal characters of the brain of Limulus and scorpion, and with the parts in the position they are supposed
to occupy in a primitive vertebrate.

nerves to the appendages, arise from the median, neural surface, and point
cephalad and neurad. (Fig. 40.)

In Limulus, the cheliceral neuromere is less conspicuous in the older stages
because it is partly covered by the posterior, lobes of the hemispheres, which grow
back over it. (Figs. 37, 38, 47 and 48.) As the cheliceral neuromere moves
forward, it unites so intimately with the third neuromere of the forebrain that it
is difficult to distinguish the boundaries between them. Both neuromeres help

58 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

form the basal ganglia that lie underneath the lobes of the hemispheres, and
which may be said to form the floor of the prosenceel. (Figs. 57, 58.)
* * * * * * * * *
Minute Structure.—The minute structure of this region has been worked
out in some detail in Limulus.
Two great masses of neurones that
probably belong to the third pro-
cephalic neuromere are found on
the median, neural surface of the
brain, underneath the posterior
lobes of the cerebral hemispheres
(Fig. 49, ch., H.c.) Their neurites
extend caudad and outward, and
then cephalad, forming a large
part of the posterior cerebral ped-
uncle. On reaching the base of
the hemispheres, they spread out
into great fan-shaped masses that
penetrate into the cortex of every
lobe and convolution, except the
median or gustatory one. (Fig. 48
and 49, G.c.) They run parallel
with similar fibers arising from the
two clusters of association cells,
H.a.s. lying above the gustatory
lobes. ‘They terminate in minute,
spherical masses of neuropile that
form an indistinct, sub-cortical
layer in each lobe, and near which
the neurites of the cortical, granule
cells terminate. Some of the fibers
appear to terminate between the
cortical cells. (Fig. 50.) Numerous
branches from these neurites ramify
in the forebrain commissure, C.0.,
and in the cheliceral lobes, ch.l.
The cheliceral lobes (Fig. 49,
rae ch.l.) are large spherical masses of
Fic. 48.—Median surface of a model of the forebrain ofa neuropile lying on the anterior
Eee EE eee lateral margin of the cheliceral
neuromeres. Their lateral surface is covered with small cells, whose neurites
together with many others, ramify in their interior. The most conspicuous ones
are those belonging to the two sets of cerebral association cells, ch, H.c. and H.as,
and the terminal dendrites of the main gustatory tract, G.tr’.

THE DIENCEPHALON. 59

The middle portion of the cheliceral neuromere forms the posterior portion of
the great mass of commissural fibers and neuropile upon which the hemispheres
rest. (Fig. 48, andc.) One may recognize in it: coarse fibers of the lateral cell
clusters, Co*; fibers from the large, central cells of the olfactory lobes (Figs.
48 and 51, ol.c’.); a dark, central mass of neuropile, b. in which innumerable neu-
rites, apparently from all parts of the brain, terminate; and a thin layer of com-
missural fibers extending from one crus to the other, c.

The more anterior portion of the commissural mass (Fig. 48); represents the

H.astr----A/f
if

Fic. 49.—Diagonal section of the forebrain of a young Limulus (about four inches long), methylene-blue prepara-
tion stained with carmine. Camera outlines. °

commissural bundles of the second and third forebrain neuromeres, a and d;
and the several olfactory, ol.c'~*, and optic commissures, op.g.* .

* * * * * * * * *

The Stomodzal Ganglia and The Suprastomodzal Commissure.—The
cheliceral neuromere is always intimately associated with the system of stomodeal
nerves and ganglia. The lateral stomodeal ganglia lie on the median side of the
nerve cords, st. g. The stomodzal commissure, si.c., which always crosses in front
of, or over, the stomodeum, forms one of the most conspicuous and constant
landmarks of the arthropod brain.

In the scorpion, the anlage to the lateral stomodeal ganglion may be faintly
seen from the surface, on the anterior median face of each half of the cheliceral
neuromere. (Figs. 14 and 15, st.g.) The same anlage may be seen in sections,
in Blatta, Acilius, Buthus and Limulus, as a thickening or evagination of the side

60 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

walls of the stomodeum. (Fig. 53,c.) The evaginated part separates from the
stomodeum and, uniting with the adjacent neuromere (cheliceral or antennal),
forms the lateral stomodeal ganglion. In insects, a frontal, or median stomodzal
ganglion arises in a similar manner from the anterior median wall of the stomo-
deum. (Fig. 14.)

Nerves extend backward from the stomodzal commissure into the labrum,
which never receives nerves from any other source. From the deep, or heemal,
end of each lateral ganglion, a nerve extends along the side walls of the oesophagus,
connected by several transverse bands with a median nerve arising from the frontal
ganglion. (Fig. 35.)

In arachnids, the median stomodeal nerve seen in the insects is absent, and
there are no traces of ganglion cells in the commissure.

The stomodeal nerves and ganglia represent a distinct system of nerves that
cannot be compared with any others. That it isa very ancient system is shown by
its vigorous growth at an early ontogenetic period. The ganglia, nerves, and
commissure, form a special system controlling the peristaltic actions of the stomo-
deum in swallowing, grinding, or sucking food. These reflexes may possibly be
directly stimulated through the sensory cells in the inner lining of the stomodeum
or in thelips; but,in Limulus at least, an essential condition appears to be an initial
stimulation of the gustatory organs in the jaws, or of the olfactory organ. From
the gustatory organs, important nerve tracts converge toward a common center
in the cheliceral neuromere, and toward the lateral stomodeal ganglion. (Fig.
II4.)

Comparison of the Diencephalon of Arachnids and Vertebrates.—
When the mouth of the arachnids was shut off from the exterior by the backward
overgrowth of the rostrum and of the optic lobes, and by the closing up of the cerebral
vesicle, the stomodzum and the adjacent ectoderm remained in the vertebrates as
the epithelial lining of the third ventricle and adjoining chambers; and the opening
through the floor of the brain, which served as the passageway for the old cesopha-
gus, remained as the infundibulum. The inner end of the stomodeum, that pro-
trudes through the infundibulum, became the sacci vasculosi; the lateral stomo-
deal ganglia, the lobi inferiori; and the stomodeal commissure, the anlage of the
cerebellum. (Figs. 3, 46.)

The median haemal portion of the cheliceral neuromere, which is the princi-
pal center for the olfactory, gustatory, and stomodeal impulses, corresponds with
the hypothalmic region, while the cheliceral lobes and the cerebral association
cells, ch.H.c, mark the beginning of the thalamus. On the roof of the ventricle,
the median ocellus persists as the parietal eye. (Fig. 47, c.) Let us examine
these comparisons more carefully.

* * * * * * * * *

The Stomodzum.—lIn existing arachnids, the roof of the diencephalic region

consists of the epithelium that was produced by the backward migration of the
rostrum and the mouth. (Figs. 3, 46, and 47.) Owing partly to the manner in

THE DIENCEPHALON OF ARACHNIDS AND VERTEBRATES. Or

which the entire brain has slipped forward, underneath the skin, and in part to
this backward growth of the rostrum, the stomodeum becomes divided into two
sections, an inner one passing through a narrow opening between the crura to the
enteron; the other extending backward, over its outer surface, to the mouth.
The outer section is dilated in most arachnids to form a large chamber or sucking
stomach. It is merely a matter of terminology whether we call the mouth the
opening of the original infolding, leading directly through the brain, or the opening
which lies much farther back beneath the overhanging rostrum. In the verte-
brates, both the original infolding and its secondary extension may be recognized.

As we have shown elsewhere, the closing of the primitive cesophagus was due
to several factors, among which were: the crowding together of the cranial neuro-
meres; the increasing size of the palial fold; the backward growth of the rostrum
and optic ganglia along the anterior median line; and the deepening of the median,
neural groove by the precocious thickening of the lateral cords. These condi-
tions lead to the infolding of the entire neuron at an early embryonic period, and
to its complete separation from the overlying ectoderm. Thus, not only were the
eyes enclosed within the brain chamber, but the passage way for the stemodeum
first became greatly constricted, and then the opening into it was covered over by
the neural crests and optic ganglia, thus forever closing the entrance to the enteron
from that direction.

The several processes seen in the arachnids, in vertebrate embryos, are blended
and abbreviated into a simple marginal overgrowth and an axial depression
of the medullary plate. The chamber thus formed over the cheliceral neuromere
then becomes the third ventricle; the epithelium of the extra-neural part of the
stomodeum merging with, and forming a part of, the epithelial lining of the ad-
jacent cavities. The primitive stomodeal infolding may still be seen in the
amphibia, as a minute pit in the middle of the procephalic lobes, near their anterior
margin. (Fig. 46.) This pit lies in the position of the future infundibulum and
appears to deepen, giving rise to it. The epithelium forming the floor of the
depression is continuous with the epithelial layer that covers the inner surface of
the adjacent brain cavities, and represents the deeper end of the stomodeum, now
converted into the membranous saccus vasculosus.

From the posterior lateral walls of the infundibulum, two rounded ganglionic
lobes are evaginated, the lobi inferiori. They correspond with the lateral stomo-
deal ganglia of the arachnids. Like them, they have direct nervous connections
only with the adjacent epithelial sac (stomodeeum), although the nerve centers
themselves are of considerable size.

According to Johnston, the epithelial wall of the saccus contains large spindle-
shaped, sensory cells, bearing a tuft of cilia which projects into the cavity of the
tube (ventricle). From them arise nerve fibers that help form a nerve plexus
over the outer surface of the sac. ‘The afferent and efferent fibers form two
lateral symmetrical tracts which run through the corpus mammalare to the ventral
part of the thalamus.

* * * * * * * * *

62 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

The Optic Ganglia.—The palial overgrowth carried the united parietal eyes
over the region of the old stomodzum, thus helping to form the roof of the third
ventricle, and giving rise to the ganglion habenule and its commissural strands.

The lateral eye ganglia also united to form a part of the brain roof, but were
crowded still farther backward, beyond the tween-brain neuromeres, carrying with
them the stomodzal commissure. The latter then became the anlage of the cere-
bellum, and the optic ganglion became the tectum opticum. (Figs. 3 and 46.)

The optic tracts extend diagonally backward and upward from the optic
chiasma to the optic ganglia, and help to form the external lateral walls of the
diencephalon; the primitive cerebellar tracts extend diagonally downward and
forward, over the inner or ventricular surface of the diencephalon to the lobi
inferiores. Thus the location and direction of these important fiber tracts still
tell the history of the parts in which they term-
inate. (Fig. 46, D.)

* * * * *

The Cheliceral Neuromere.—The an-
terior neural portion of the cheliceral neuro-
mere is probably in part comparable with the
thalamus division of the diencephalon. It con-
tains the great masses of association cells going
to the hemispheres and cheliceral lobes (Fig.
49, ch.l.) and also the cheliceral nerves and
ganglia. (Fig. 49, ch.g.) The cheliceral nerves
unlike all the other cranial nerves, arise from
the median neural surface of the neuromere.

Fic. 50.—Portion of the cerebral cortex
of a young Limulus. Camera, Zeiss obj.16 They are probably crowded against the cere-

mm., oc. 18. Golgi preparation. Z
bellar commissure by the enlargement and

backward migration of the optic lobes. (Figs. 47,57 and 58.) They are represented
in vertebrates apparently by the fourth nerves, which seem to arise from the roof
of the brain, between the optic lobes and the cerebellum, although their roots
have their origin far forward, on the floor of the midbrain region. The excep-
tional location and direction of these nerves in vertebrates, therefore, is in harmony
with their exceptional location and direction in arachnids; and the extraordinary
resemblance between them affords collateral evidence in confirmation of the ex-
planation just given for the origin of the tectum opticum and the cerebellum.
Otherwise these peculiarities of the fourth nerve are inexplicable.

* * * * * * * * *

It will be observed that the whole floor of the vertebrate brain consists of
more or less modified neuromeres. Those structures which now form the roof
of the brain, such as the palium, ganglion habenule, optic lobes, and cere-
bellum, are not in any way comparable with neuromeres; they have no segmental
value, and they now have no genetic relations with the neuromeres over which

THE DIENCEPHALON OF ARACHNIDS AND VERTEBRATES. 63

they happen to lie. The tectum opticum, for example, really belongs to the third
forebrain neuromere, in front of the diencephalon, and except as a matter of
convenience, cannot be classified as part of the mesencephalic neuromeres.

(See p. 157.)
2H * * * * ap * * *

Summary.—Thus we have in the diencephalon of vertebrates a remarkable
combination of special characters; viz. a sharp cranial flexure; a funnel-like depres-

AN op.f.
’ bs : ‘

\

Yr \ + ty
Xe 5

Fic. 51.—Forebrain of a young Limulus, hemal surface. A. A single optic fibre, showing the arrangement of
its principal branches. Methylene-blue preparation. Camera outlines.

sion in the floor, with voluminous nerve centers (lobi inferiori) on its side wall;
the presence of important nerve tracts arising from the cerebellum, the olfactory
and gustatory organs, and that converge toward a common center in the in-
fundibular region; the presence of a membranous sac that contains the remnants
of sensory cells, and a special set of neuro-muscular reflexes. Each of these
characters is without parallel elsewhere in the brain of vertebrates. They indi-
cate that this particular region either has some very unusual part to play in cere-

64 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

bral activities now, or did have some such function in the past; but what that
function was, or is, or what is the history and the meaning of these parts, neither
vertebrate anatomy or physiology gives us the slightest clue.

But when we compare these conditions with those in the arachnids, their
meaning is sufficiently clear. The infundibulum is the passageway for the old
stomodzum, and the latter is the saccus vasculosus. The lobi inferiori are the
lateral stomodeal ganglia; the nerve plexus of the saccus, the stomodzal nerves;
the tween-brain flexure is the one which occurs in arachnids between the supra-
and infra-stomodzal ganglia; the remarkable centralization of fiber tracts in the in-
fundibular region is the retention of the ancestral condition seen in arachnids,
where fiber tracts from the olfactory and gustatory organs, and from the stomodzal
commissure, converge toward the swallowing centers, or the ganglia that control
the neuro-muscular apparatus of the stomodeum.

In both vertebrates and arachnids, there is: a. but one passage, or opening,

Fic, 52.—Semi-diagrammatic, longitudinal section of the lateral eye ganglion of a young Limulus.

in the floor of the brain, and in both cases that passage is of similar relative
dimensions; 0. it lies just behind the hemispheres and the lateral eye nerve roots; and
c. just in front of the anterior end of the notochord; and d. in front of the first
pair of somatic motor nerves; e. in both cases, the opening lies approximately
between the right and left halves of the fourth and fifth neuromeres; /. in both
cases evaginations from the median face of the half neuromeres form special
ganglia (stomodzal ganglia, lobi inferiores), quite unlike any other cranial ganglia;
g. in both cases, these ganglia have similar associations with the stomodzeal com-
missure (cerebellum), with the epithelial tube lying in the opening through the brain
floor, and with the olfactory and gustatory organs; h. and although of considerable
size, the ganglia have no direct nerve connections with any organs external to
the brain.

* * * ok * ok * ok Eo

The diencephalon, therefore, of arachnids and vertebrates, may be defined
as one, two, or more, neuromeres surrounding the primitive stomodeum, and
uniting the primitive forebrain (supra-cesphageal ganglion) with the midbrain,
or thoracic neuromeres. It lies in the angle of the oldest, and most striking

THE MESENCEPHALON. 65

cranial flexure, and marks the anterior termination of the notochord. The
chamber lying between and above these neuromeres (the third ventricle) was
for a certain period an extension of the stomodzum, or anantechamber to that por-
tion that actually perforates the brain floor. The final closing of the entrance of
this antechamber took place probably at a point just back of the cerebellum
(rhomboidal fissure). (Figs. 3, 46, 58.)

IIJ. THE MESENCEPHALON.

In typical arachnids there are six thoracic neuromeres. The first one (two or
three) (cheliceral neuromere) has already been described as the tween-brain, the
remaining ones constitute the midbrain. They differ from all other neuromeres
in their great breadth, and in the enormous size of their ganglia and gustatory
nerves.

Fic. 53.—Longitudinal, horizontal sections of the head of an embryo scorpion, showing origin of the lateral
stomodzal ganglion. A, At the level of the suprastomodzal commissure; B, at a lower level, showing the inner
end of the lateral stomodeal ganglion; C, still deeper level, showing its origin from the sides of the stomodeum.
Camera outlines.

In the scorpion, they rapidly increase in size with the growth of the append-
ages, forming a compact group in which the original segmentation is clearly in-
dicated by the arrangement of the nerves and cross commissures. They are
never so completely fused in the adult as to lose their identity, differing in this
respect from those in the forebrain in front of them, and in the vagus region
behind.

In the adult scorpion, the cross commissures are very short, and the thick
cords, or crura, are but slightly separated, leaving a very small opening for the
passage of the cesophagus. (Figs. 40-43.)

In Limulus, this opening is larger, the anterior ends of the crura are widely
separated, and the elongated anterior commissures are bent into wide loops by the
backward movements of the cesophagus. (Figs. 38-39.) These conditions, and
the absence of a tween-brain flexure, give the brain of Limulus a different out-
ward appearance from that of the scorpion, although structurally they are very
much alike.

The great size of the neuromeres and the divergence of the crura make this
the broadest and most voluminous part of the brain, giving it a rhomboidal out-
line, when seen from above.

5

66 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Mesencoele.—The mesencoele is formed in part by a marginal, epithelial
overgrowth, and in part by a deep median depression or infolding, between the
two cords. The epithelial overgrowth is formed along the whole margin, as a
thin overarching shelf that projects about a third way over each cord. (Figs.
136, 227 and 231.) Later, the cords settle bodily below the surface, and as there
is no delamination of a superficial epithelium, a wide opening is left that is
gradually closed in by the union of the thin edges of the two overgrowths.

As the two cords in this brain region remain horizontal, the potential mesen-
ccele is broad and shallow, except in the middle line where it extends to the bottom
of the deep median fissure.

In the more posterior parts of the brain, in the vagus and branchial regions,
similar overgrowths occur. But the cords are
much narrower here and their margins are brought
together, like the closed covers of a book, by the
deep median infolding, so that the chamber is con-
verted into a deep, narrow fissure. The bottom
of this fissure is converted into a ‘“‘canalis cen-
tralis,”’ when the neural commissures grow across
the fissure, just above the floor. (Figs. 55, 69.)

* * * * * *

Comparison with Vertebrates.—The mid-
brain neuromeres of arachnids are represented in
vertebrates by the group of conspicuous neuromeres
forming the floor of the brain, from the infundi-
bulum to the vagus region. he region is charac-
vy terized by: a. its great width; 6. its enormous
Creat agen ve ope cranial ganglia, widely separated from the crura
about ready to hatch. Camera outline, and associated with the oral and hyoid arches; c¢. by

the segmentally arranged gustatory organs; and d.
by the unusual distinctness of the neuromeres in the early embryonic stages, in
marked contrast with the regions just in front and behind.

In vertebrates confusion has arisen from the failure to distinguish between
the true neuromeres on the floor of the brain and the various structures that have
been forced out of their original positions onto the roof of the brain. The cerebel-
lum and the optic lobes, as we have indicated above, are of very unequal value,
and in no wise comparable with neuromeres. Their position in vertebrates is a
purely secondary one, a long way caudad to their original position and connec-
tions. The optic lobes, that in vertebrates form the roof to the midbrain, clearly
belong to the procephalic neuromeres, while the primitive cerebellar “neuromere’”’
is a special commissure primarily associated solely with the diencephalon. The
area covered by these structures therefore, varies greatly, and has no constant
relation to the underlying neuromeres.

If we remove the cerebellum and optic lobes from the brain of a vertebrate

THE MESENCEPHALON. 67

embryo (frog), it will be seen that the underlying neuromeres form a natural
group, that corresponds approximately with the posterior four or five thoracic
neuromeres of arachnids. It is impossible, at present, to accurately fix either the
anterior or the posterior boundaries of this group, for we do not know how many,
if any, have been added to the cheliceral neuromere to form the diencephalon, or
whether or no the last, or sixth, thoracic neuromere has fused with the first vagus.
There should be, according to our provisional interpretation, five neuromeres,
from the fifth to the ninth inclusive, in this region; and that number corresponds
pretty nearly with the estimated number of neuromeres, and with the number
of head cavities, segmental nerves, and visceral arches that are known to occur
there. (Fig. 58.)

IV. THe METENCEPHALON, OR Vacus NEUROMERES, AND V, THE BRANCHIEN-
CEPHALON, OR BRANCHIAL NEUROMERES.

The Metencephalon.—In many arthropods, the transitional region between

one group of metameres and the next is often marked by an abrupt change
in the size of the pertinent organs, and by their union in the middle line and

gy,

Fic. 55.—Section through the first vagus neuromere of Limulus, showing the neural and hzemal commissures, central
canal, and lemmatochord.

ultimate disappearance; at the same time, in the next following segments, the same
kind of organs may be greatly enlarged. These conditions are similar to those
seen at the point of incomplete fissure in annelids.

The most striking cleavage zone of this character in the arthropods is the
vagus region. It lies between the thorax and abdomen, and is one of the most
conspicuous transitional zones in the whole body. It is present in many insects,
crustacea, trilobites, etc., but its character is best known in the arachnids.

In Limulus, there are two vagus metameres, the chilarial and opercular,
whose neuromeres form an important part of the brain. The external boundaries
of the two metameres are at first similar to those of the other abdominal segments.
(Figs. 141,142.) But ultimately, the only remaining external traces of the chil-
arial segment are the chilarial appendages and the narrow ridge on the posterior

68 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

margin of the thoracic shield. (Fig. 152, ch.pl.) The tergite of the opercular
metamere is a narrow wing plate, still clearly outlined on the lateral margins, but
in the middle it is completely fused with the abdominal shield op.pl. The hinge
of the cranial buckler comes between the tergites of the chilarial and the opercular
metameres. (Fig. 155.)

The chilarial and opercular neuromeres are completely fused with each other
and with the posterior end of the midbrain; and in the adult only the commis-
sures and the distribution of the corresponding nerves afford a clue to their
identity. (Figs. 65, 66, and 70.)

In the scorpion the first four abdominal metameres belong to the vagus
group. At an early period, there is a pair of rudimentary appendages on each of
these four metameres. (Figs. 15 and 16.) In young scorpions, the first two pairs

/ : heo. ae an
‘opt gete get Unt) hte, Lee
‘optr.

Fic. 56.—Cross-section of the mesencephalon of a young Limulus brain. On the right, the section passes
through the fourth pedal ganglion, with its gustatory, entocoxal, and pedal nerves, and the ascending roots of the
fifth and sixth gustatory nerve roots. On the left, the section passes through the root of the fourth hzemal nerves,
showing its relation to the commissures and to the great longitudinal tracts. The figure is constructed from
methylene blue and von Rath’s preparations. The capital letters indicate the same neurones as in Figs. 65 and 66.

form minute papille near the unpaired genital opening. The third pair form the
pectines, and the fourth, in part, the first pair of lung books.

The four neuromeres become fused into a dense triangular mass, crowded
forward beneath the midbrain. Its posterior end is elevated, producing a pro-
nounced hind-brain flexure. (Figs. 40, 43, 54.) The vagus neuromeres are rela-
tively narrow, and as the corresponding appendages are crowded toward the
middle line, their pedal nerves arise in a characteristic manner from the neural
surface, not from the sides.

* * *k * * *k * * *

The Branchiencephalon.—In the arachnids, the anterior vagus meta-
meres are characterized by their highly modified tactile or sensory appendages,
the posterior ones only being respiratory. In the transitional forms between
vertebrates and arachnids, respiratory segments were doubtless added to the

THE METENCEPHALON AND THE BARNCHIENCEPHALON. 69

head, from time to time, thus leading to the union of the entire group of
branchial neuromeres with the posterior portion of the brain.

We therefore look on the hindbrain of vertebrates as composed of two main
parts successively added to the midbrain, namely: a. the vagus section, consisting
of from two to four fused neuromeres, associated with appendages that have under-

Olfactory
olfactory organ
Coordination
hemispheres
Visual
parietal eye
lateral eye
Swallowing

stomodaeum
infundibulum

and
Gustatory
leg-jaws
oral-arches
Locomotor
Auditory
Equilibrium

Vagus
tactile
lateral line

Respiratory
cardiac
branchial
hypobranchial
sympathetic

Digestive
excretory
genital

58

Fic. 57.—Semi-diagrammatic figure of an arachnid brain and nerve cord. It represents, in the main, the
conditions in Limulus. The parietal eye and the vagus lobes and nerves, however, have the location and arrange-
ment characteristic of the scorpions.

Fic. 58.—Here the same parts are shown in the position they are supposed to have in vertebrates. The prin-
cipal changes are in the position of the optic ganglia, which have moved backward and upward to form the
optic lobes; the pedal ganglia have become the cranial ganglia of the fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth nerves;
the coxal gustatory organs lay the foundations for the principal lines of canal organs. The branchial neuromeres
have fused with the brain, and the components of the several branchial and vagus nerves going to the same kind of
organ have united, forming compound nerves distributed respectively to the respiratory organs, sense organs,
heart, intestine, and the great branchio-thoracic, or hypo-branchial muscles. The similiarity in the linear distribu-
tion of the principal functions, or the nerve centers controlling them, is shown by the inscriptions between the
figures.

gone extensive reduction and modification, the most important remnants forming
organs of a tactile or gustatory nature; this characteristic group of neuromeres
is largely sensory, and now forms the hindbrain, or metencephalon of arachnids;
and 0. a second group of neuromeres belonging to the branchial segments, and

70 THE SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN.

which were mainly associated with the gills, heart, and viscera; they united with
the brain at a later period.

The combined vagal and branchial neuromeres of arachnids form the hind-
brain, or medulla, of vertebrates. (Figs. 57-58.)

In arachnids, all the branchial neuromeres do not form a part of the brain,
except possibly in certain specialized land forms; but they already show the begin-
ning of that functional segregation of sensory, branchial, cardiac, and motor
nerve fibers that is so characteristic of the hindbrain neuromeres of vertebrates.
(See cardiac and hypobranchial nerves).

In arachnids (scorpion and Limulus) there are in all seven vagus and branchial
neuromeres, which is close to the estimated number in this region in vertebrates.
However, this number probably varies in vertebrates, as it does in arachnids, and
only an approximate numerical agreement and serial location is offered as having
significance. The segregation of the vagal and branchial nerves (in both verte-
brates and arachnids) into the groups mentioned above, is of much greater sig-
nificance than the agreement in the number of neuromeres.

CHAPTER V.

MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

METHODS.

In order to better understand the minute structure of the brain, it is essential
to first determine the structure of one of the isolated neuromeres of the spinal
cord. I have used for this purpose one of the branchial neuromeres of Limulus.
But even here the structure is so exceedingly complex that it is possible to work
out or to represent but a very small part of it in detail. Our observations on the
structure of an invertebrate neuromere will be of special interest, because they
are based on the gross anatomy and embryology, upon the minute structure as
obtained by several methods of analysis, and upon the physiology.

For the development of the primitive sense buds and the early embryonic
stages of the cord, I have used the scorpion. For the distribution of the fibers
and cells, I have used the methylene blue “intra vitam” method on Limuli from
2 to 6 inches long: the brain and cord being mounted whole, or sectioned. The
adult nervous system has been tested for its physiological reactions, and the dis-
tribution of the peripheral nerves has been followed with care. Its minute
structure was worked out from sections prepared by several methods, the most
satisfactory ones being the usual Golgi method, and von Rath’s picro-osmic-
platinum chloride mixture, followed by methyl alcohol.

I. THE BRANCHIAL NEUROMERES IN LIMULUS.

Development.—In Limulus and in the scorpion, during the late embryonic
stages, a thin epithelial overgrowth forms on the lateral margins of the cords, anda
deep infolding appears in the median line between them. The lining to the me-
dian infolding is in part converted into the epithelium of the canalis centralis,
in part into the inner neurilemma, or neuroglia, and into the lemmatochord.

The lateral cords themselves sink bodily below the surface, without separat-
ing off a surface epithelium, and are covered by an ectodermic layer formed from
the marginal overgrowth united to the local (interganglionic) remnants of the
middle cord. (Figs. 227,231.) As in the arthropods generally, they lie in a
horizontal plane, separated by the median infolding that forms the middle cord.
In the vertebrates, similar conditions prevail, except that the median margins of
the lateral cords are more deeply infolded than the lateral ones, thus bringing the
neurogenic surfaces of the cords face to face. Thus the two lateral cords of the

71

72 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

arachnids form the lateral walls of the neural tube of vertebrates, the middle cord
canal (canalis centralis) being at the inner surface, the neural crests on the outer
one, and the nerve fiber layers on the lateral wall of the tube. (Figs. 134-137.)

* a * * * * * * *

Commissures.—In arachnids, two main sets of transverse commissural
fibers are formed in each neuromere, the neural and the hemal commissures.

The hemal commissures are the first to
arise. They make their appearance on the
hemal side of the epithelium of the median
groove as two separate bundles, an anterior
and a posterior one. (Fig. 64, a.4.co. and
p.co.) The hemal commissures are im-
portant features in all arthropod neuromeres,
and represent in part the remnants of the
transverse fiber tracts that extend round the
body and unite the longitudinal cords. Seen
in sagittal sections of the adult cord, they
appear as two large irregular bundles,
separated by a narrow space through which
the neuroglia of the median canal and me-
dian fissure is continuous with that of the
lemmatochord.

At a much later period a new set of com-
missures appears above the floor of the median
groove, thus converting that part of the groove
into a canal; a large anterior one, am.n.co., a
small middle one m.n.co., and a small but
sharply defined posterior one, p.2.co.

As the longitudinal commissures approach
the neuromere, they divide into distinct neu-

Fic. s9.—The branchial and abdominal ral and hemal tracts h.ir. and w./r. In the
neuromeres of @ young Limulus three inches ain, the fibers in each tract either terminate

long. The intestinal plexus, 7. p/, longitudinal
abdominal, !. ab, general cutaneous, g. cw, seg- in neuropile masses situated on the corres-

mental cardiacs, c, and the great branchio- a bs 7
thoracic nerves, b. th, are shown. ponding side of the neuromere, or run straight
through it, the neural tracts passing above the

neural commissures, and the hemal tracts below the hemal commissures.
The peripheral nerves consist of two main pairs. (Figs. 59, 60.) The
anterior pair is the more complex. Owing to the central relation of its fibers,
its position on leaving the cord, and its relation to the great muscle masses, it may
be spoken of as a hemal nerve. It is comparable with the motor or ventral root
of a vertebrate spinal nerve. It is a mixed, non-ganglionated nerve, and contains
general cutaneous, somatic motor, cardiac, and visceral, or intestinal elements.

THE CELL CLUSTERS OF THE BRANCHIAL NEUROMERES. 73

The posterior nerve is more voluminous, but less complex than the anterior
one. It arises from a large conical “ganglion,” consisting of neuropile and
ganglion cells, situated on the posterior neural surface of the cord. (Fig. 63, C.)
It supplies the gill muscles and the sense organs of the corresponding branchial
appendage. The majority of the elements are sensory, and are confined in the
main to the neural side of the nerve. It is therefore a neural ganglionated nerve,
comparable with the posterior, or ganglionated
root of a vertebrate cranial, or spinal nerve.

Cell Clusters——The nerve cells in the
neuromere are arranged in clusters that are
remarkably constant in their size, location, and
relation to fiber tracts. Each cluster probably
represents the remnants of one or more primitive
sense buds.

In exceptional cases, the methylene blue fails
to affect the cells and fibers, but stains rather
sharply the neuroglia, thus giving excellent pic-
tures of the nerve cell clusters and their sheaths.
(Fig. 61.) The clusters are mainly confined to
the neural surface and lateral margins of the
neuromere. The more important ones are as
follows:

a. A cluster of large cells in two or more
groups, on both neural and hemal sides of the
anterior lateral margin. (Fig. 61, A.) Their
axones cross to the opposite side, forming part of
the anterior hemal commissure, entering the
hemal nerve as its third root. (Figs. 61 #.r.* and
62, a.) Before crossing, each axone gives off a
large collateral, a’, that extends backward into
the longitudinal hemal tracts.

b. A very large cluster of medium size cells
(Fig. 61, B.), whose axones, b. converge into a 0. ;.% pra iene yea cae eaee
large bundle, directed vertically. On reaching location of the principal masses of neu-
the hemal surface of the cord, each fiber divides, "P'S undies and neurones.
one branch entering the main longitudinal hemal tracts and extending backward,
as a coarse unbranching fiber, to the more posterior neuromeres. (Fig. 62, b.);
the other branch, b’, crosses to the opposite side, in the posterior part of the
anterior hemal commissure, behind the fibers forming the third root
of the hemal nerve. They are probably association elements. (Figs. 61, 62
and 64.)

c. Numerous clusters of minute cells, on the neural surface of the pedal
ganglion. Their axones terminate in the large mass of interwoven fiber bundles

74 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARCHNIDS.

that constitute the exceedingly complex core of the ganglion. Probably sensory.
(Figs. 62, C. and 63 C.)

d. A cluster of about thirty very large motor cells on the posterior median
part of the neural surface. Their axones form a compact bundle which extends
vertically and then crosses to the opposite side, the two crossing bundles constitut-
ing a large part of the posterior hemal commissure. (Figs. 60, 61, 62 and 64,
D and d.)

AT
Meares
Sop

o

3,
ou

J
a

Cy

x

_ her,
| ha

Fic. 61.—One of the anterior branchial neuromeres of a young Limulus. On the right, the principal cell clusters
of the neural surface are shown; on the left, the principal nerve roots, fiber tracts, and neuropile centers. The
capital letters indicate the cell clusters, and the small letters, the corresponding fibers; Hr. '~5, the five roots of the
hemal nerves, Composite figure, based on methylene blue and von Rath’s preparations.

The crossed fibers extend backward along the hemo-lateral side of the cord
to the next posterior neuromere, forming the fifth root to the hemal nerve, h. 7°.
They are very conspicuous in sections on account of the large size and pro-
nounced coloring of the axis cylinders and their sheaths. On approaching the
next following neuromere, the bundle becomes more compact and gradually
moves toward the outer margin of the cord, where it turns sharply forward and

THE CELL CLUSTERS OF THE BRANCHIAL NEUROMERES. 75

outward into the hemal nerve. It there divides into two bundles; one /.ab, con-
stitutes the nerve supplying the hemo-neural and longitudinal abdominal muscles;
the other, extending onward into the main trunk, forms the branch that supplies
the branchio-thoracic muscles (hypoglossal elements).

e. A group of large cells, lying on the posterior hemal side of the pedal
ganglion. (Figs. 60, 61, 63, and 64, E and e.) Their axones are directed diago-

Fic. 62.—Anterior branchial neuromere of a young Limulus seen from the hemal surface. On the right, the
superficial, longitudinal, hamal tracts are shown; on the left, the underlying hemal cross commissures, and their
relation to the principal groups of neurones. ()utside the main figure, on the left, is a cross-section of a neural
nerve, N. N’, and a hemal nerve, H. N, On the right, the minute structure of some of the nerve tubes in
the hemal nerve, m. t, and in the neural nerve, s. ¢, is shown.

nally forward, inward and upward; they then cross over to the opposite side, and
return again to the hemal surface where they extend forward as fine unbranched
fibers on the lateral margins of the longitudinal, hemal tracts.

The crossing bundles constitute apparently the whole of the posterior neural
commissure. (Fig. 64, p.n.co.). Before and after crossing, the axones give off
numerous dentrites which ramify in the neuropile core of the pedal ganglia (Fig.
63, EZ.) Probably association fibers.

f. A medium sized cluster on the anterior lateral margin of the pedal ganglion.

76 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

(Figs. 60, 61, 63, 64,F.) Their axones form a rather loose bundle (ill defined in
sections) extending downward, inward, and forward along the neural portion
of the cord, to the next anterior neuromeres. Before and after crossing, the large
irregular fibers give off numerous collaterals which ramify diffusely in the central
fibrous portions of the neuromere. (Fig. 63, F.) Termination unknown; probably
association fibers.

g. On the anterior lateral part of the neural surface, small clusters not
clearly defined, that send axones diagonally inward and forward. (Figs. 61 and
63, G.) The scattering axones appear to cross in both the anterior neural and
the anterior hemal commissures. Some appear to send collaterals backward to
the next posterior neuromere. Termination unknown.

h. Along the lateral hemal margin, on either side of the pedal ganglion,
are several groups of cells that are usually very conspicuous. (Fig. 62, H***%.)
They differ from the other neurones in that each cell gives rise to a large number
of dendrites and axones. The dendrites are minute and their innumerable
branches fill the core of the pedal ganglion, often giving it a dark blue, finely
granular appearance. The axones are large, irregularly branching fibers ex-
tending outward, as bundles of parallel fibers, onto the hemal surface of the pedal
nerve. These neurones are the only ones of their kind and are characteristic of
the pedal nerves, both in the thorax and in the abdomen.

The axone bundles from the several clusters, H*%, converge toward the
heemal side of the pedal nerve where they form a distinct bundle, readily recog-
nizable in sections. (Fig. 68,4.) They are the motor nerves that supply the gill
muscles.

z. Two large groups of neurites on the anterior hemo-lateral margin, sending
great bundles of fibers forward and inward into the anterior portion of the an-
terior hemal commissure. (Fig. 62, J and 64,2.)

j. A large group of cells on the posterior hemal margin, projecting their
fibers forward and then across to the opposite side, in the anterior portion of the
posterior hemal commissure. (Figs. 62,and 68, J, von Rath’s preparations.) The
cells and fibers of this group have not been identified by the methylene blue
process.

NERVE-ROOTS.

The Neural Roots.—The neural or branchial nerve arises from a large
ganglion on the posterior neuro-lateral surface of the neuromere, and extends
upward (neurally) and outward to the gill. In cross sections (von Rath’s
preparations) near the neuromere, it consists of two portions, the larger one
formed of a coarse polygonal meshwork of neuroglia, each mesh crowded with
black dots, representing the cut ends of innumerable nerve fibers. (Fig. 62, 5.4.)
These sensory fibers constitute about three-quarters of the entire nerve. Most
of them terminate in very fine dendrites, in the large oval mass of neuropile that

BRANCHIAL NERVE ROOTS. vB

constitutes the posterior lateral portion of the core of the pedal ganglion. (Fig. 63).
A small group of fibers extends beyond the main core into the median neural
region of the neuromere. (Figs. 60 and 61, .p.) This neuropile center is very
dense and stains with great intensity in von Rath’s preparations.

The hemal fascicle consists of small nerve tubes with sharply defined axis
cylinders, separated by a wide, clear space from the outer sheath. They are
motor fibers arising from the peculiar hemal neuromeres, H**. (Fig. 62, m.t.)
They supply the branchial muscles.

Fic. 63.—Anterior branchial neuromere of a young Limulus, showing the course of the principal neurones. Neural
surface; methylene-blue preparation.

The oval mass of neuropile in the ganglion of the branchial nerve consists of
an extraordinarily complex system of interwoven bundles of very fine fibrils. In
this neuropile the following fibers terminate: 1. the dendrites of about three-
quarters of all the fibers of the branchial nerve: these fibers are sensory. 2.
the collaterals of the motor neurones, H*%. 3. the collaterals of the E neurones
whose axones cross in the posterior neural commissure, and 4. the dendrites of the
minute C neurones that constitute the principal cellular covering of the ganglion.

78 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

The Hzemal Nerve Roots.—The hemal nerves arise from the anterior hemal
margin of the neuromere and extend upward and outward. In the more pos-
terior segments, their apparent point of attachment shifts forwards to a point
midway between the two neuromeres, but without changing the root terminals.
(Fig. 59.) They contain the following fascicles:

a. A bundle of large motor fibers arising from the D neurones on the neural
surface of the opposite side, in the next anterior neuromere. (Figs. 61,62. 7°.)
It runs along the hemo-lateral margin of the cord, becoming more and more dis-
tinct as it approaches the next following neuromere. There it bends outward
onto the anterior hemal surface of the hemal nerve, dividing into two fascicles.
One forms the small, purely motor nerve supplying the hemo-neural and the
longitudinal abdominal muscles, /.ab.; the other passes into the main part of the
nerve, and separates farther on, as the branch that supplies the branchio-thoracic
muscles. (Fig. 59, 6.th.) (hypoglossal elements.)

b. A large fascicle of pale fibers (Figs. 61 and 62, Hr’), that extends along
the anterior neural margin of the nerve. On entering the cord, it runs diagonally
forward, inward, and upward, terminating in an elongated mass of neuropile,
on the median, neural surface of the next anterior neuromere. Its peripheral
termination is unknown. Probably cardiac.

c. A large central fascicle, H.r’, terminates in a conspicuous, isolated mass of
neuropile of the same side, near the anterior median region of the same neuromere.
Some of the fibers pass through the neuropile, neurad, and cephalad, joining the
median, longitudinal, neural tracts. Probably general cutaneous fibers.

d. This fascicle, H.r*, is not easily followed in sections, but its fibers are
frequently seen in methylene blue preparations. They spring from the large
neurones A, on the opposite side of the neuromere. Their collaterals are shown
ata’. (Figs. 61, 62.)

e. This fascicle extends backward toward the neuropile center of the bran-
chial nerve, H.r*. (Fig. 61.)

f. The intestinal fascicle is a small bundle of fine fibers, zzz. In the anterior
segments, it leaves the cord with the hemal nerve; in the more posterior ones, it
arises separately. (Fig. 59, 7” "*.) In the first ganglion (Fig. 61, it.), it runs
along the posterior side of the hemal nerve and then turns sharply forward over
the neural surface of the sensory root, H.r’*, to a small, ill defined group of cells
lying in group A.

We find, therefore, in the hemal nerves, the following roots or fascicles: two
sensory roots terminating in neuropile on the neural surface of the cord, on the
same side, one in the same neuromere, H.r*, the other in the one next in front
of it, H.r*. (Fig. 60.) Two roots, ending in cell groups on the opposite side of the
cord, one group, D, on the posterior neural side of the next anterior neuromere, the
other, on the anterior neural surface of the same neuromere, A. A fifth root,
H.r*, extends caudad, disappearing in the neuropile near the base of the neural
nerve. The intestinal branch should perhaps be counted as a separate nerve.

COMMISSURES OF THE BRANCHIAL NEUROMERES. 79

It is only in the second neuromere that it is anatomically a branch of the hemal
nerve; in the more posterior neuromeres it arises from the side of the neuromere
and entirely separate from the hemal nerve roots.

Commissures.—The transverse commissures of the cord may be divided
into two sets: a. the primary, or hemal commissures, passing underneath the
epithelium of the embryonic median groove, and representing the primitive nerve
tracts uniting the right and left cords; and 6. the secondary, or neural commissures,
crossing the neural fissure above the floor of the median groove. The neural
commissures, phyllogenetically and ontogenetically form much later than the
hemal, and only after the median groove becomes deep enough to bring the
superior median margin of the two cords into contact.

The anterior and posterior hemal commissures are separated by an opening
in the floor of the neural canal through which the neuroglia passes to the underlying
lemmatochord (Figs. 64 and 68.)

The anterior heamal commissure consists of several indistinct bundles. So

B m™m.n.co.

Fic. 64.—Sagittal section of two anterior branchial neuromeres, showing the relation of the principal neurones
and fiber tracts to the cross commissures.

far as could be determined, the anterior portion consists of fibers from neurones

I; the middle portion from neurones A; and the posterior portion from neurones

B (Fig. 64).

The posterior hemal commissure contains fibers from group J (anterior
bundle) and from group D (posterior bundle).

The hemal commissures therefore contain, among fibers of undetermined
character, crossed motor axones and various collaterals.

The neural commissures are three in number; an anterior, a middle and
a posterior one. (Fig. 64.) The sources of the fibers in the anterior neural
commissure could not be certainly determined. Those of the middle commissure
mn.co., are derived from neurones, F, and those of the posterior commissure from
neurones E. No other fibers could be located in these commissures. The neural
commissures appear to be largely composed of association fibers.

The Neuropile Centers.—The neuropile centers are dense masses of inter-
woven terminal dendrites. They appear in von Rath’s preparations as dense
black masses of fine fibrils, and in methylene blue, as masses of fine blue dots or
lines, according to the character of the stain.

80 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

The principal centers are : a. a large oval center at the root of the pedal nerve,
forming the medullary core to the pedal ganglion. (Fig. 60.) A prolongation of
it extends cephalad and mesad, forming a compact, oblong mass, near the center
of the neural surface of the neuromeres; 7.p. 6. A center for the cephalic root
of the hemal nerve, Hr’, extending along the median neural surface of each
ganglion. c. A center for the middle root of the hemal nerve, Hr’, on the ante-
rior median face of the neuromere. d. The hemal tracts; large, spindle-shaped
tracts, one on either side of the median line, on the hemal surface. (Figs. 62, 67,
68, l.h.tr.) (e) Four small masses, on the hemal surface, between the anterior
and posterior hemal commissures and the longitudinal hemal tracts. For longi-
tudinal tracts in sections, see Figs. 67 and 68.

Il. Toe CepHatic NEUROMERES.

We are now in a position to describe the arrangement of cells and fibers in
the cephalic neuromeres.

The brain neuromeres, in the main, closely resemble those of the cord.
The principal differences in form are due to their linear union and to the lateral
divergence of the crura. The histological differences are due mainly to the
absence of motor neurones such as the hypobranchial, intestinal, and cardiacs, to
the greater size and isolation of the pedal ganglia, and to the presence of the
large gustatory nerves.

Cell Clusters.—The nerve cells are arranged in clusters, of varying sizes,
that have special neurilemma sheaths, as in the cord, but they are so crowded
together that it is difficult to determine the exact arrangement. They cover the
neural surface and lateral margin of the crura, leaving the commissures, part of
the gustatory tracts, and the hemal surface exposed. (Figs. 65 and 66.)

The Commissures.—Each neuromere has several bundles of cross commis-
sures that have terminal relations similar to those described for the branchial neu-
romeres. Owing to the divergence of the crura they form long, backwardly directed
loops in which the commissural fascicles are difficult to identify, except where
they approach the crura.

In very young crabs, sagittal sections show-that the commissures of each
neuromere are surrounded by distinct membranes. There are two groups of
commissures for each neuromere, corresponding to the neural and hemal commis-
sures of the cord, and no doubt containing similar components. In the adult,
the median portion of the anterior thoracic commissures form compact bundles
with a common neurilemma sheath; near the crus, the several fascicles separate
to their respective terminals. (Fig. 56.) The more posterior thoracic commis-
sures, and those in the hindbrain, are shorter, and the neural and hemal fascicles
are widely separated, leaving a space between them, which represents the begin-
ning of the fourth ventricle. (Figs. 46, 47 and 55.)

The neural commissures.—I have not been able to work out the relation

THE CEPHALIC NEUROMERES. 81

of all the commissural elements in detail, although some of them stand out very
clearly. For example, in methylene blue, the posterior neural commissures are
often very conspicuous. They extend diagonally forward (anterior ones) and
outward on to the neural surface of the crura, over the great gustatory tracts, to
the cell clusters Z, on the posterior hemo-lateral margin of its neuromere. (Fig.
65, E, p.n.co.)

A bundle of these fibers, on the anterior side of the second thoracic neuro-
mere, indicates that the cheliceral neuromere, in spite of its distinctly pre-oral
position, has its commissure behind the cesophagus. In most cases, one may
recognize two sets of these neural fibers to each neuromere, an anterior one,
arising from the neurones £, and a posterior fascicle, ending in a separate mass of
neuropile on the lateral half of each crus.

The hemal commissures contain several sets of fibers. The ones most
clearly seen in methylene blue preparations are rather large fibers which arise from
neurones A (Fig. 66) and after crossing, enter the roots of the hemal nerves.

Between the nerve roots and the commissure, are two sets of longitudinal
fibers extending outward and backward along the hemal surface of each crus,
one on the median side, one on the lateral. (Fig. 66, left.) Most of the longi-
tudinal fibers come from the opposite side through the hemal commissure; some
of the lateral ones probably come from neurites, B, on the neural surface of the
same side, corresponding with group B of the cord. i

The Hzemal Nerve Roots.—It will be recalled that the cranial hemal
nerves supply the integument of the cephalothorax. The branches, which
in the abdominal nerves run to the great longitudinal muscles, to the branchio-
thoracic muscles, to the heart and to the intestines, are absent from the six pairs
of thoracic, heemal nerves. Hence they have but a single root, mainly, if not wholly
sensory, and representing root two, H.r’, of the branchial neuromeres.

In most preparations, the hemal roots appear to extend only part way through
the crus, terminating abruptly in the main longitudinal tracts on the median side
(Fig. 66, right side). They appear to end there in a mass of neuropile, like that
of the second root of the abdominal nerves, H.r’. In other preparations, many
fibers are seen to enter the hemal commissure and terminate in the A neurones
of the opposite side, which no doubt correspond to the A neurones of the abdomen.

No trace of any other roots could be found. From this observation we may
infer that roots two and three, H.r’, and H.r°, of the abdominal hemal nerves
are sensory general cutaneous; that root one, H.r’, contains the cardiac elements;
and that the neurones, D, are distributed to the branchio-thoracic muscles.

The Neural Nerve Roots and the Cranial Ganglia.—Owing to the greater
size and specialization of their terminal organs, the neural, or pedal nerves of the
head are much larger and more complex than those of the branchial region, but
in the minute structure of their ganglia and nerve roots they are much alike.

Ganglia.—In the adult Limulus (Fig. 218), each cranial ganglion forms a

large oval mass of neuropile, projecting a considerable distance from the sides
6

82 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

|

\

i
NI
ul

Fic. 65,—Brain of young Limulus about three inches long, seen from the neural surface.

The cerebral hemi-
sphere, on the left, is shown in optical section, at the level of the giant association neurones, H. as, and on the right,

at a deeper level, showing the principal cerebral lobes and the gustatory tracts, G. cir?. and g. ir.2
Fig. 48. On the right, behind the hemispheres, the superficial arrangement of the clusters of nerve cells, and
the cranial nerves are shown. On the left are seen the gustatory nerve roots, the great longitudinal gustatory
tracts, the principal neurones and their relation to the neural commissures, and the principal neuropile masses
in the pedal and stomodzal ganglia; methylene-blue preparation.

Compare with

THE CEPHALIC NEUROMERES. 83

4 -\ ol.m.n. ih per ocol dine
f — pa.ey.
-- — g.ol.l.n.

_.-- Ley.n.

sia op.g.
--- op.g.7

Fic. 66.—Same from the hxemal surface, showing on the left the more su
nerve roots, and commissural fibers; on the right, the

fibers arising from the optic nerve, op. tv, and from the giant nerve cells of the optic ganglia, op. g41, and olfactory
lobes, ol. c! and ol. c3.

perficial neurones, fiber tracts,
deeper ones. Note the great extension backward of the

84 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

of the brain. In the young (Figs. 35, 36, 38, 39), they are separated from the
brain by long narrow stalks, or tracts, devoid of neurones or neuropile.

Most of the peripheral fibers terminate in the neuropile core, forming many
minute irregular centers (Fig. 65). There is a special neuropile center on the
anterior neuro-median side of each ganglion, formed by the terminals of a small
bundle of rather distinct fibers. This center in some cases appears like a dark
granular blotch, in others like a beautifully distinct, anastomosing network (Fig.
65,w). Their peripheral relations were not determined.

The nerve cells of the ganglia are very small and numerous. They are con-
fined in the main to the hemal surface, sending short, vertical axones into the
neuropile, where they divide, one branch passing outward into the nerve, the
other forming branches in the neuropile, which extend toward the crus. (Fig.
66, C).

The Motor Neurones.—On the hemal surface of the ganglia, there are two
very conspicuous bundles of coarse fibers, coming from large neurones on either
side of the ganglion. A third bundle joins them, coming from cells on the neural
side of the ganglion. They form the small anterior and posterior ento-coxal
nerves supply that the coxal muscles. (Fig. 66, a.en.cx and p.en.cx.)

These neurones agree with the H neurones of the branchial ganglia, in that
each one sends a considerable number of axones into the nerve trunk.

The Gustatory Nerves and Tracts.—The most striking features of the mid-
brain neuromeres are the large nerve roots supplying the taste organs in the coxal
spurs (Fig. 65, g.2.7.°-°). They extend along the neural face of the pedal ganglia,
sweeping diagonally inward and forward, the inner end of each root overlapping
the next posterior one. The united bundles form an immense longitudinal tract
along the median neural margin of each crus, between the neural and hemal
commissures.

The more posterior roots are the largest, that of the sixth appendage largest
ofall. The deep, inner ends of the fifth and sixth roots form large oval neuropile
enlargements on the posterior median face of each crus.

Toward the anterior end, one may recognize two subdivisions to the main
tract. Near the stomodzeal ganglion both divisions turn outward and downward,
then upward, forming a sharp semi-circular turn round the crus, giving the latter,
in cross-sections, a very unusual spiral structure. The larger bundle apparently
terminates in the great cheliceral lobe (Figs. 65 and 114, ch.l); the smaller one g.ir?
forms a slight dilatation, consisting of very dense nodular neuropile, on the lateral
margin of this lobe, and then passes straight forward, along the neural surface
of the cheliceral neuromere to the median cerebral lobe, G.cir*.

The very large fasciculus of the sixth nerve comes, not from the coxal spurs,
which here form crushing mandibles devoid of gustatory spines, but from the
large spatulate organ on the outer margin of the coxa (flabellum), the function of
which is to test the composition of the water passing to the gill chamber.

war

THE CEPHALIC NEUROMERES. 8

A small, posterior fasciculus, coming from the chilaria, joins the main gusta-
tory tract. (Fig. 65, chela.n.)

In methylene blue, the gustatory tracts have a very characteristic appearance,
as each fascicle contains a great many parallel bundles of extremely minute fibers
that look like rows of dots.

In sections (von Rath’s method), they may be recognized by their dense black
masses of fine parallel fibers (except in the nodes, where they are twisted and inter-
woven) and by the small quantity of neuroglia contained in them. (Fig. 56,
gnr*.)

In the scorpion, a similar tract may be recognized. (Fig. 69.) But here the
most conspicuous portion is the immense neuropile bodies on the roots of the first
three vagus nerves. These nerves supply the genital papille and the pectines,
and the immense size of these vagal lobes is due to the great development of
sensory (tactile) organs in the pectines.

Similar lobes are seen in Limulus, but lying farther forward, and associated
with the immense, flabellar nerve (gustatory) belonging to the sixth pair of legs.

III. Loncirupinat TRACTS.

There are several well defined longitudinal tracts in Limulus that may be
traced the entire length of the brain and cord, but their relations to the various
centers and to the motor and sensory terminals is exceedingly difficult to deter-
mine. In the main, the sensory elements run on the neural surface of the cords,
and the motor ones on the hemal surface.

We may distinguish the following tracts:

The Longitudinal Hemal Tracts of the Brain and Cord.—The hemal
tracts are great sheets of longitudinal fibers covering the hemal surface of the brain
and cord. ‘They can be seen in von Rath’s preparations, along the hemal surface
of the neuromeres, hemal to the transverse commissures (Figs. 55, 56, 67, 68, l.h.
tr). They leave the anterior and the posterior ends of the neuromere in the nearly
isolated hemal sections of the longitudinal connectives (Fig. 64). Midway
between the ganglia they cannot be distinguished from the other fibers of the cord.

In methylene blue preparations, these fibers of the cord may be followed at least
from one ganglion through the next without branching, and in some cases through
several ganglia. In the brain, individual fibers may be followed the whole length
of the crus. (Fig. 66.)

In the brain many of these fibers terminate in small clusters of dendrites,
scattered over the crura, just below the hemal surface (Fig. 66, left side); in the
branchial neuromeres they are seen on the hemo-lateral surface just neurad of the
longitudinal fibers. (Fig. 62, right side.)

The fibers of the hemal tracts are derived from several sources. One impor-
tant source is the large cluster of B neurones on the neural surface of each bran-
chialneuromere. Their fibers, after reaching the hemal surface, divide, one cross-

86 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

ing to the opposite side in the anterior hemal commissures, the other turning
backward into the hemal tracts. (Figs. 61 and 62.)

In the cerebral neuromeres, the hemal tracts contain similar fibers, derived
from similar cells. The latter may be seen in small clusters between the roots
of the ganglia, on the neural surface of the crura. Their fibers pass vertically
through the crus, joining the longitudinal tracts and the cross commissures. (Figs.
56, 65, 66, B, b, and b.’)

The lateral margin of the hemal tracts of the crura receives conspicuous
fibers that cross in the hemal commissures with the roots of the hemal nerve.
Near the lateral margin of the crura they turn backward and join the lateral
margin of the hemal tracts (Fig. 66, left side). A similar, but less conspicuous, set
of fibers forms on the median side of the tract.

The lateral margin of the hemal tracts also receives a considerable number of
large fibers from the third and fourth lobes of the optic ganglion, op.g*’*, and
from the crossed and uncrossed fibers of the large lateral neurones of the olfactory
lobes, ol.c’.

The median margin receives fibers from the large central cells of the olfactory
lobes, ol.c.*, and from the giant association neurones in the median lobe of the
hemispheres. (Fig. 49, H.as. ir.)

A remarkable band of fine fibers comes from the optic nerve, passing through,
or over, the lateral margin of the first two optic lobes, along the lateral margin of
the optic stalk, through the tween-brain, and along the median hemal surface of
the crura to the beginning of the cord. (Fig. 66, of.tr.) A similar band of fine
fibers extends along the entire lateral margin of each hemal tract of the cord.
The two bands are united by a narrow commissure extending across the anterior
margin of each neuromere. (Fig. 62, of.ir.?) It is not clear whether these fine
fibered bands of the cord are continuations of the optic bands in the brain or not.

The great majority of the longitudinal fibers of the crura that are directed
forward appear to terminate on the hemal surface of the forebrain commissures.

The Longitudinal Neural Tracts.—These tracts lie close to the median
line, on the neural surface of the cord. They receive all the fibers of the first
root of the hemal nerves, many fibers from the nucleus at the root of the pedal
ganglia, and large unbranched fibers whose origin is unknown, that pass through
the cord over several neuromeres.

In the crura the neural roots of the hemal nerves appear to be absent, and
the other constituents of the neural tracts could not be certainly identified.
But we may recognize the following tracts which may or may not be modifications
of those already described.

The lateral or pedal ganglion tracts are large and exceedingly complex,
consisting of a confused mass of interlacing fiber bundles which form the lateral
margins of the crura; most of their fibers come in roughly parallel bundles from
the roots of the pedal ganglia (Fig. 56, /,¢r., right side). On reaching the tract,
the fiber bundles take on a longitudinal trend. The tracts are greatly enlarged

THE NERVE FIBER TRACTS. 87

opposite the pedal ganglia, and between them they are reduced to narrow bands.
(Fig. 56. l.tr, left side). At the anterior end of the crura, they appear to pass
outside (neural) the gustatory tracts, onto the posterior neural surface of the
tween-brain commissure. (Fig. 49, /.ir.)

The general cutaneous tracts are two large, continuous columns of
neuropile on the median side of each crus. They lie between the gustatory and
hemal tracts, and extend from the tween-brain to the last vagus neuromere,
(Fig. 56 G.c.ir.)

They usually have a slightly different color and appearance from the lateral
ones, from which they are separated by numerous bundles of vertical fibers. The
latter are arranged with considerable regularity, the more important sources being
neurones B, sending axones hemally, and neurones E, sending them neurally.
(Figs. 56 and 65, B and E.) The principal constituents of the tracts are the
crossed and uncrossed terminals of the cutaneous nerves, h.n. The majority
of the uncrossed fibers and the optic fascicles, op.tr, extend lengthwise of the
tracts. :

Comparison of the Fiber Tracts of the Arachnid and Vertebrate Brain.—
A comparison of the fiber tracts in Limulus with those in the vertebrates presents
great difficulties. These difficulties are partly due to our imperfect knowledge
of the brain of arachnids and of the lower vertebrates, and partly to the fact that
the latter is generally studied for the purpose of explaining the structure of the
higher types of brain, not for comparison with an invertebrate brain, that its
own structure might be better understood. When we know more about the
brain of arthropods, and less emphasis is laid on the artificial system of classify-
ing cranial nerves, now in vogue among American neurologists, many points are
likely to be cleared up which are now obscure.

Nevertheless the facts, so far as we understand them, indicate that the arachnid
and vertebrate brain are in essential agreement in the distribution and relations
of their main fiber tracts. The agreements to which we would call attention are:

a. In both classes, important longitudinal tracts containing the principal
motor fibers extend along the hemal surface of the brain and cord.

b. In both classes, conspicuous sensory tracts lie near the median neural
surface, coming from segmentally arranged taste organs and from other sense
organs, 7.¢., tactile, temperature, or auditory, having a less precisely determined
function.

c. In these sensory columns, there are local enlargements, or lobes, corre-
sponding with special local functions; 7.e., in Limulus, the flabellar lobes of the
eighth and ninth neuromeres; in the scorpion, the pectinal lobes of the tenth,
eleventh, and twelfth vagus neuromeres; in vertebrates, the auditory and the
vagal lobes of their respective neuromeres.

d. In both classes, the numerous gustatory fascicles and those from the
vagus neuromeres form a very conspicuous median neural tract, extending the
whole length of the brain floor. It terminates in a special center, in the dienceph-

88 MIUNTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS. ‘

Fic, 68.

Fics. 67 and 68.—A series of sections of the first branchial neuromere of an adult Limulus, showing the location
of the principal cell clusters, commissures, fiber tracts, lemmatochord, and central canal. The numbers 66 to 138
indicate the serial numbers of the sections,

THE NERVE FIBER TRACTS. 89

alon, which is in turn connected by special tracts with the olfactory lobes, hem-
ispheres, and cerebellum.

e. In both classes, the nerve roots are arranged in two distinct series, neural
and heemal; each series may contain both motor and sensory elements.

In Limulus, the hemal roots enter the brain toward the hemal surface and
extend horizontally, through the crus and the hemal commissures, to the main
nucleus or cell cluster on the other side of the median line. But many fibers
end in dendrites on the same side the nerve enters.

In vertebrates, a similar condition prevails in the ventral or hemal nerves,
for according to Johnston “It is a noticeable peculiarity in the origin of the nerve
(i.e., the third nerve of vertebrates) that a large part of the fibers arise from the

Fic. 69.—Four cross-sections of the brain in the vagus region of an adult scorpion, showing the enormous vagal
lobes, the central canal, and the cephalic portion of the middle cord, or lemmatochord.

nucleus of one side, and cross to enter the root of the opposite side. The same
arrangement is found in the roots of other ventral nerves, but to a much less
degree.”

On the other hand, the neural nerves are associated with special ganglia, which
arise independently of the brain, and which are attached to its neuro-lateral
margin. In Limulus, these fibers end, or originate, on the same side the nerve
enters the brain; very few, if any, fibers of a neural nerve arise from cells located
on the opposite side of the median line.

f. In both classes, the floor of the brain is divided lengthwise into two main
columns, a median and a lateral one, by an important series of vertical fibers;
arcuate fibers, vertebrates, B and £, fibers, arachnids. The prolongations of
these fibers run lengthwise in the hemal (and neural ?) tracts and crosswise in
the commissures.

g. In Limulus, there is in the vagus region an important decussation of im-
pulses coming from the trunk (See section on Physiology, p. 191); and there is also

go MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

there a special condensation of commissural bundles, that have been crowded
together from before backward, in order to leave a large opening for the end of
the oesophagus. (Figs. 57 and 58.) In the vertebrates, there is a similar back-
ward dislocation of commissural bundles, forming a special group just back of the
choroid plexus of the fourth ventricle, ‘“commissura infirma.” Johnston says (p. 287)
that ‘Behind the choroid plexus the c. infirma contains the visceral, sensory
elements proper to the segments of the VII, IX and X nerves. It is probable that the
course of the root fibers of these nerves within the brain has been influenced by the
crowding backward of their decussation and median nucleus by the choroid
plexus.’ The choroid plexus could hardly have the power to dislocate the
cerebral framework. The dislocation was probably brought about, as in Limulus,
by the backward migration of the outer end of the old stomodeum, and when
that closed, the choroid plexus grew over it, leaving the permanently distorted
commissures to testify to the event.

h. In both classes, there is a remarkable ganglionated commissure extending
over the neural surface of the brain, the stomodzal commissure of arthropods
and the cerebellum of vertebrates. Both structures represent very primitive
commissural tracts, the only ones which develop, primarily, from the roof of the
brain chamber. Both commissures may be ganglionated, and they are the only
ganglionated transverse commissures in the primitive brain. Both commissures
develop in connection with the fourth neuromere. Both have special relations
with the gustatory centers on the posterior median face of the stomodzal opening
(infundibulum).

In arachnids, this commissural arch lies behind the cerebral lobes and the
optic ganglia. In vertebrates, it is crowded backward by the enlarged optic
lobes so that part of its fibers are directed downward and forward, toward the
posterior wall of the diencephalon. (Figs. 3, 46, 57, 58.)

IV. CoMMISSURES.

Summary.—The facts, bearing on the cross commissures of arachnids,
that have been brought out in the preceding pages, may be summarized as follows:

1. The right and left cords of the primitive neuron were united by a series
of transverse commissures, two for each neuromere. ‘The anterior commissure
is primarily related to the anterior segment of the neuromere and to its peripheral
nerve, the other to the posterior segment, and to its nerve. The commissures
arise, during the early embryonic periods, as fibrous, non-cellular bands, extending
across the floor of the middle groove. ‘They are separated from one another by
deeper infoldings of the groove. In the adult, they are still separate, and each
contains several distinct fiber bundles, differing in origin and in histological
characters.

These commissures always retain their primitive position on the floor of the
neuron, hence they are called the hemal commissures. They are the primary

THE COMMISSURES. gi

communicating paths between the right and left cords, and between the right and
left peripheral nerves.

During the later stages, the cords increase in thickness, the median in-
folding forms a deep fissure, and then three new commissures appear in each
neuromere, extending across the fissure above the old ones. These secondary, or
neural commissures, consist largely of association fibers.

With the formation of the secondary commissures the bottom of the fissure,
at certain points in each neuromere, is converted into a canal, ‘‘canalis centralis”
(Figs. 55, 56, 68, 69, ¢.c.), that is lined in the earlier stages with an epithelium
derived from a part of the original median infolding. (Figs. 222, 224 and 231.)
The floor of the canal is formed in part by the hemal commissures, and the roof
is formed in part by the neural commissures. When the neuromeres are widely
separated, there are of course wide gaps in the roof and floor of the canal between
the commissures in front and those behind. In the vagus region, owing partly
to the increased thickness of the crura, the canal is greatly enlarged, marking the
beginning of a chamber comparable with the fourth ventricle or metenccele.
(Figs. 55 and 56). Here the neuromeres are more closely united than elsewhere,
and their neural commissures, together with some of those belonging to the more
anterior neuromeres that have been crowded backward into this territory by the
cesophagus, form a special group over the posterior part of the region of the
fourth ventricle. (Fig. 47,C.)

In the scorpion also, the immense vagal lobes are united by two special neural
commissures. (Fig. 47, A and 69.)

The combined neural commissures of the vagal neuromeres of the arachnids,
and the more posterior thoracic ones, consist largely of somatic sensory associa-
tion fibers; they probably represent the beginning of the commissura infima of
vertebrates.

* * * * * * * * *

In the arachnids there is a wide gap between the forebrain and midbrain,
where there are no primitive commissures. This opening, or infundibulum, is the
passageway for the old cesophagus. In front of it, the character of the commis-
sures changes greatly, in both vertebrates and arachnids. There are no neural
commissures, and the hemal ones form practically a single, but very complex
mass of fibers. (Fig. 48.) In it we may recognize the olfactory commissure,
representing the commissure of the first cerebral neuromere, and lying, morphologi-
cally, at the anterior end of the nervous system. Owing, however, to the in-
ward and backward migration of the lobes, it lies, in the adult Limulus and
scorpion, on the posterior hemal surface of the forebrain. Fig. 47 A and B.
The forebrain commissure also contains the commissures of the second and third
neuromeres, and of the lateral eyes; but these commissures, which arise at an
extremely early period, are not separated into distinct bundles. (Fig. 48.)

In Apus, the ganglia of the median ocelli unite with each other in the middle

g2 MINUTE STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN AND CORD OF ARACHNIDS.

line, over the neural surface of the brain; they rest on the latter by two short
stalks. In many other phyllopods and arachnids, the optic ganglia occupy a
similar position, in that they lie close together, over the neural surface of the
brain, behind the hemispheres. In the vertebrates, they permanently occupy
this position, and have become united by secondary commissures, one in the
habenule, the other in the optic lobes. (Fig. 308.)

The most conspicuous commissure in the arthropods and one of the first to
appear, is that belonging to the system of stomodeeal nerves. Its ganglia, one
median and two lateral, arise from the walls of the stomodeum. It is the only
commissure originally provided with ganglion cells, and the only one formed
primarily across the neural surface of the brain. It has especial relations to
nutrition, through its association with the olfactory, swallowing, and taste centers.
It represents the primitive cerebellar commissure of vertebrates, where it appears
to have had similar relations.

V. Tor NEUROCELIA.

Summary.—The transformation of the paired nerve cords of invertebrates
into the hollow nerve tube of vertebrates is affected by several independent factors.
These factors make their appearance as active forces in the arachnids, and they
have already established there the salient features of the vertebrate neuroccelia.
These factors are as follows:

1. The infolding for the middle cord initiates the canalis centralis and the
more posterior parts of the brain cavities.

2. The increasing depth of the median groove, and the increasing thickness
of the two cords, brings the median edges of the cords together, and leads to the
formation of the neural commissures, which form the rafters over the median
groove, and aid in its conversion into a canal.

3. The formation of the palial overgrowth for the forebrain, and the mar-
ginal overgrowths in the hindbrain region, initiates the development of the broad,
membrane-roofed ventricles of the whole brain.

4. The stomodeal infolding, between the forebrain and midbrain, establishes
the deep and narrow third ventricle of the diencephalon.

5. The deep transverse infolding across the very anterior end of the medul-
lary plate gives rise to the cavity of the olfactory lobes.

6. The broad chamber formed by the palial overgrowth, and into which the
hemispheres project, establishes the prosenccele, or the first and second ventricles.

7. The median and the lateral eye ganglia unite above the neural surface
of the brain, one forming a partial roof to the diencephalon, and the other, owing
to the shape of the ganglion, forming a broad, dome-like covering for that part of
the brain chamber known as the mesenccele.

8. The stomodaal commissure, forced backward by the enlarging optic
ganglia, forms the first stage of the narrow arch (cerebellum) over the future
metenccele.

THE NEUROCGLIA AND THE NEUROGLIA. 93

9. In the forebrain, and in the midbrain regions, the medullary cords, in both
vertebrates and arachnids, remain practically horizontal. As they are very
broad (the diencephalon alone showing a marked lateral compression), and as
the overgrowth is almost entirely from the sides, the resulting cavities are broad
and shallow. The roof is epithelial in character, and all the nervous material,
except the optic ganglia and the stomodzal commissures, forms the floor of the
chamber.

to. In the region of the cord, however, the infolding combines another factor,
especially prominent in the vertebrates, in that, as the median groove deepens, the
two cords close like the covers of a book, bringing their outer, or neurogenic sur-
faces, face to face, converting the neural groove into a deep lying canalis centralis,
and reducing the marginal overgrowths to the narrow strip of epithelium that
roofs over the posterior fissure. (Figs. 134, 137 and 231.)

* * * Ps * * * * *

VI. THE NEUROGLIA.

The neuroglia arises from the epithelial lining of the middle cord groove or
canal. Referring to the early stages of Acilius (Fig. 221), it will be seen that the
medulla is invaded by numerous small, dark nuclei, that spread out laterally from
the middle cord, forming a uniform envelope about the medulla, the so-called inner
neurilemma. Later these cells multiply and invade the medulla and surround the
nerve cells, forming a coarse, nucleated reticulum or neuroglia.

In the adult, this tissue is easily recognized. In sections of the brain and cord
of Limulus stained in hemotoxylin, Lyons blue, and acid fuchsin, it is intense red,
and the nerve fiber masses blue. In preparations treated by von Rath’s method,
it is intense black, nerve fibers gray. In sections of the adult cord (Figs. 67 and
68), the neuroglia network may be seen springing in root-like processes from the
thick layer lining the central canal, as well as from the sides of the neural fissures
and the surface of the medulla.

CHAPTER VI.

PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

I. COMPONENTS OF A NEUROMERE.

es

In my first paper “On the Origin of Vertebrates,’”’ 1889, it was maintained
that the primitive arthropod neuromere was a complex structure, consisting of
two segments, four pairs of nerves, and a segmented middle cord.

While I have seen no reason to change my view as to the composite nature
of primitive neuromeres, I do not now regard the ancestral arthropod as an elon-
gated worm-like animal of many like metameres, but as a small-bodied one of
about three imperfect segments. In the arachnid and crustacean descendants
of this stock, the evolution of neuromeres, as we have explained elsewhere
(Chap. XIII) was a gradual process that advanced with the successive additions
of new groups of unlike metameres.

II. NERVES OF THE DIENCEPHALON AND MESENCEPHALON.*

A. Neural Nerves.

In Limulus, there are six pairs of thoracic neural nerves. (Figs. 36-39.)
The third nerve is typical. (Fig. 79.) It divides, soon after leaving the brain,
into three sets of nerves. The gustatory nerves, three in number, are ganglionated
and terminate in the numerous sensory buds of the mandibular spines. They are
absent, or very minute, in the sixth pair of legs. The anterior and posterior
entocoxal nerves, a.e.n., and p.e.m. are motor and supply the tergocoxal muscles;
the median entocoxal nerve, m.e.n., supplies the sensory knobs of.the coxopodite.
The main pedal nerve, consisting of two principal branches, supplies the muscles
and sense organs of the appendage.

The Flabellum.—There are a few minor differences between the six pairs
of pedal nerves; the most important is an enormous enlargement of the
median entocoxal nerve of the sixth leg to form the nerve of the flabellum. (Fig.
80, flab.)

The flabellum is a large spatulate organ attached to the outer side of the
coxal joint of the sixth leg. It is first seen in the embryos as a rounded knob,
lateral to the sixth leg, and quite separate from it. Hence it has the same rela-
tion to the outer side of the appendage that the mandibular placode has to the
inner. (Figs. 141-148.) There are indications of flabellar placodes on the other

1For nerves of the prosencephalon see Chapters VIII to X.

94

CRANIAL GANGLIA. 95

thoracic segments, but they quickly disappear. The flabellar placode finally
unites with the base of the sixth leg and then appears to be a partofit. The flabellum
lies in the mouth of the channel leading to the gill chamber, and practically all
the water going to the gills, either from the front or from the sides, must pass over
its anterior surface. This surface is pigmented and very richly supplied with
sense organs and nerves, and it undoubtedly serves to test the quality of water
going to the gill chamber. (see p. 113.)

The flabellar placodes are probably represented in scorpion by the lateral
coxal sense organs. (Figs. 15—16, s.so.)

The Cranial Ganglia.—The base of each pedal nerve, near its origin
from the brain, enlarges to form an immense spindle-shaped ganglion. Similar
ganglia are present in Branchipus, scorpions, and spiders, and they are also present
on the pedal nerves of many other arachnids and phyllopods.

In Limulus they arise, at an early period, from large ectodermic thickenings

between the base of the legs and the corresponding neuromere. How the con-
nection between the ganglion and neuromere is established was not determined, but
it is certain that the ganglion is not an outgrowth of the nerve cord. The body of
the ganglion separates from the thickening, but retains its connection with the
overlying ectoderm by ganglionated nerve strands. The latter become the
gustatory nerves, and the ectodermic remnant of the thickening becomes the
mandibles with their gustatory spines. The thick mass of slime buds on the
inner face of the mandibles also arises from these thickenings.
- In young Limuli, the ganglia are relatively large masses of cells, separated
by clear fibrous stalks from the corresponding neuromere. (Figs. 36-39.) In
the adult (Figs. 70 and 218) they are drawn a little closer to the brain, but are
never completely merged with it.

In scorpion embryos, similar ectodermic thickenings appear at the base of the
thoracic appendages, furnishing the anlage for the coxal ganglia. (Fig. 74, D.)
The thickenings on the third and fourth appendages become greatly enlarged to
form the four hypostomeal spurs that lie on either side of the mouth and rostrum.
(Figs. 15-16.) The median face of these spurs is highly sensitive (gustatory ?)
and from them are developed enormous ganglia and thick masses of mucous glands
or slime buds.

In the adult, the median face of the anterior pair of spurs is deeply grooved.
The two grooves lie close together and thus form a thick chitenous tube, lined with
sensory hairs. In feeding, the scorpion thrusts the spurs into its prey and sucks
the blood and other fluids through this tube into the mouth. (Fig. 43, mal.)

The independent origin of the flabellar and coxal spur placodes of Limulus
and the scorpion suggests their homology with the inner and outer branches of
an originally triramous appendage.

The coxal placodes represent the supra-branchial placodes of vertebrates.
Their homology is indicated by their similarity in position, in function, in devel-
opment, and, so far as may be determined, in number. In both cases, the pla-

PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANG

96

THE HZMAL NERVES OF THE DIENCEPHALON AND MESENCEPHALON. 97

codes split into a special group of gustatory organs, and into a large cranial gang-
lion. (Figs. 27-34.)

The Ganglia of the Cord.—Limulus.—The roots of the neural nerves
arising from the postcephalic neuromeres are also provided with ganglia, but they
are not as large as those on the cranial nerves. They merge with the cord at an
early period, and, in the adult form the large swellings on the roots of the branchial
nerves. (Figs. 59-64.)

Scorpion.—In the scorpion the anterior pairs of nerves are much larger than
the posterior ones, and spring from the outer or neural surface of the cord. In
stage H, just before hatching, the root of the anterior nerve contains a large mass
of cells, evidently arising independently of the nerve cords, just as the pedal
ganglia do in the thorax. (Fig. 73, D.) In the later stages, just after hatching,
the ganglion is drawn toward and partly merges with the cord. In the adult,
ganglion cells are scattered for some distance over the root of the nerve. (Fig.
73) C.)

Meantime the two hzemal nerves move forward, and unite to form a single
one with two roots, which in turn unite, a short distance from the cord, with the
ganglionated neural nerve. There is no actual mingling of fibers, but the nerves
run together, for a short distance, as a single nerve. (Fig. 72.)

The Hzemal Nerves.—Limulus.—A single pair of hemal nerves arise from
the anterior hemal surface of each thoracic nueromere. (Fig. 70, mn.) They
are much smaller than the pedal nerves, without ganglia, contain motor and
sensory fibers and are distributed mainly to the integument and other tissues of
the thoracic shield. The sixth pair alone sends branches to the heart and intes-
tine. Near the outer margin of the entacoxite, the nerves which are elsewhere
round, become broad, flat bands; the parallel bundles of nerve fibers become inter-
woven in a complicated manner, and there is an increased number of neurilemma
nuclei, but no ganglion cells. Beyond this swelling, the nerve divides into two
main branches, 2 and h; one going to the neural surface of the carapace, and the
other to the hemal. After several subdivisions (see original memoir), the end
branches of all these nerves form a continuous, subdermal plexus, distributed
over the whole inner surface of the neural and hemal integument, supplying the
skin, glands, muscles and sensory hairs.

Lateral Line Nerve of Cheliceral Neuromere.—All these thoracic hemal
nerves are essentially alike, except the first one or that of the cheliceral neuro-
mere. ‘This remarkable nerve (Fig. 70, l.c.v.), at first extends forward, and then,
bending backward in a broad curve, extends the whole length of the body. It
runs close to the neural surface, just outside the bases of the appendages, and does
not begin to branch till it reaches a large sclerite behind the base of the sixth leg.
The main nerve continues beyond this point the whole length of the branchial
chamber, sending one small branch toward the base of each of the five gills. This
is a purely sensory nerve and supplies the skin lining the channel along which the
water is carried to the gills. It is very remarkable that this nerve should cross the

7

98 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

territory of so many other nerves of the same nature, in order to innervate a
region so far removed from its origin. It is suggestive of the lateral line nerve of
vertebrates, but its origin from the tween-brain region is strongly against such
an interpretation. It resembles the large nerve in ganoids and teleosts, the
ramus lateralis accessorius, which arises well forward in the head and is distributed
to the taste buds of the head, back, tail, and fins.

The character of the sensory terminals to this nerve in Limulus is unknown.

Ill. Tue NeRvES OF THE METENCEPHALON.

We have already shown that a certain number of abdominal metameres in
arthropods move forward and unite with the thorax, and that there is a great
reduction in their size and an obliteration of their external boundaries. The
appendages and muscles show a similar reduction, but the corresponding nerves,
neuromeres and heart segments are but little changed. In fact, the nerves and
neuromeres may be relatively more voluminous or extensive than elsewhere.
These metameres constitute the vagus zone and their neuromeres the meten-
cephalon. Their nerves may be appropriately called vagus nerves, because, as in
the vertebrates, they extend backward into regions to which they did not originally
belong.

LIMULUS.

Neural Nerves.—In Limulus, this region contains two metameres, the chi-
larial and the opercular. . The tergites of these metameres are still visible in the
adult, the chilarial tergite forming a narrow band on the posterior margin of the
thoracic shield, the opercular tergite, two wing-like segments on the anterior
margin of the branchial shield. The hinge joint between the two shields lies
between these two metameres. (Figs. 150-155.) The first entapophysis is
formed between the chilarial tergites and the true thoracic metameres. (Fig. 193.)

The chilaria are without question true appendages. ‘Their early develop-
ment is like that of the other appendages, and they have separate nerves, muscles,
mesoblastic somites, and gill bars. The chilarial and opercular neuromeres
have all the typical nerve elements. They resemble the branchial neuromeres
more than the thoracic, although in the adult they are intimately fused with the
hindbrain and widely separated from the branchial neuromeres. Their nerves
pass out of the occipital foramen of the endocranium together with the spinal’
cord. (Figs. 70-218.)

The chilarial nerves arise close together from the posterior neural surface
of the accessory brain. They pass out of the endocranium just below the roof
of the occipital ring, enter the chilaria and supply their muscles, the adjacent
skin, and the numerous gustatory spines on their median side. (Fig. 81, 1.n’.)

The opercular nerve follows the same course, and on reaching the operculum

THE NERVES OF THE METENCEPHALON.

Fic. 71.—Brain and nerve Fic, 72.—First two free bran-
cord} of a new-born scorpion, chial neuromeres, with the lemma-
seen from the hzmal surface, tochord, spinal ganglia, and spinal

nerves for an adult scorpion.

99

100 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

divides into three nerves which then subdivide into motor and sensory branches
(for details, see original memoir, 1893).

The hemal nerves (Fig. 70, hn’ and h.n*), pass out of the endocranium
through the occipital ring and are distributed to the sides of the body, between the
sixth pair of legs and the operculum. For the distribution of the intestinal and
cardiac branches, see pp. 103, 200.

Scorpion.

In the scorpion, the vagus region consists of four metameres, two genital,
one pectinal, and the first branchial, as I demonstrated in my first paper on this
subject, 1889.

The tergite of the first metamere fuses with the thorax and cannot be detected

Fic. 73.—A, Section of an abdominal neuromere of a new-born scorpion, showing the ganglionated ‘ dorsal,’’
or neural, nerve root; B; same through the non-ganglionated hemal nerve root; C, section of the second free
branchial neuromere of an adult scorpion, showing both neural and hemal nerve roots and the neural and hemal
transverse commissures; D, third branchial neuromere of an old embryo of a scorpion, showing the large ganglionic
lobe at the root of the neural nerve.

inthe adult. The other three tergites remain separate throughout life, the second
or genital, and the third or pectinal, being much narrower than the fourth (Fig. 17).
The fusion of these metameres is more strongly marked on the neural than on the
heemal surface.

During the early embryonic stages, one may recognize four distinct pairs of
rudimentary, abdominal appendages (Figs. 15, 16). During the later stages,
the first lung book appears in place of the last appendage. The third pair gives
rise to the pectines; the first pair disappear altogether by the time of hatching;
while the second pair finally unite in the median line in front of the pectines to
form the genital cushion, or tubercles.

Before they unite, about stage G (Fig. 16, B), the genital openings may be

THE NERVES OF THE METENCEPHALON. : IOI

recognized on the median margin of each appendage. About the time of hatching,
the genital ducts are carried forward and unite to form an unpaired opening,
between the remnants of the first pair of abdominal appendages and the second.
During stage G, the brain may be dissected out, and the arrangement of neuro-
meres and some of the nerves observed (Fig. 54). The first two neuromeres are
crowded forward and are overlapped by the posterior margin of the hindbrain.
This produces a sharp hemal flexure in the brain, at the dividing line between the

Fic. 74.—D, Section through the basal lobe of the third thoracic appendage of an embryo scorpion; E£, section of one
of the segmental sense organs on the outer margin of the thoracic appendages. See Figs. 15 and 16.

thoracic and vagus region; the first two vagus neuromeres are thus partly concealed,
in surface views, under the overlapping hindbrain. The vagus nerves, during
these early stages, are small and cannot be followed with certainty. In the adult
scorpion, they present an interesting condition. The nerves are now divided
into two groups, one containing all the neural nerves, the other all the hemal.
(Fig. 42.) This is largely due to the constriction which is such a characteristic

Fic. 75.—Side view of the endocranium, brain, neural arches, and associated muscles of an adult Limulus; semi-
diagrammatic.

feature of the vagus region in arthropods. All the paired organs in this
vicinity, such as genital ducts and appendages, are drawn toward a median
position, hence in the adult the corresponding nerves take their origin from the
neural surface of the cord, near the middle line.

The Neural Nerves.—One small nerve, supplying the sexual ducts and papil-
le, probably represents the nerve of the second pair of rudimentary appendages
(Fig. 42, v’). The nerve to the pectines has three roots, the first one g.n. forming

102 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

an immense bilobed ganglion (ganglion nodosum) composed of ganglion cells and
concentric lammine of medullary substance (g.nd).

It is united with its mate by two distinct bridges of nerve tissue that lie some
distance above the surface of the neuromeres they thus form an imperfect roof to
a deep, narrow canal between the two ganglia and the median sides of the under-
lying neuromeres (Fig. 40). The anterior ends of the ganglia may be traced in
transverse sections a long distance forward, as two great longitudinal fascicule,
just below the neural surface of the thoracic neuromeres. (Fig. 69, v.g./. and
gtr.)

The ganglion on the second root (ganglion fusiforme) is smaller, spindle-
shaped, and as near as can be determined, appears to belong tothe third neuromere.
The third root is small, fibrous, and without any ganglionic enlargement.

The Hemal Nerves.—The two hemal nerves of the first neuromere remain
separate, as in a typical thoracic neuromere. In each of the three following
neuromeres, they unite to form a single nerve, each with a double root. (Fig. 42,
hm.**.) A short distance from the brain all five hemal nerves form a compact
bundle that extends backward through the occipital foramen of the cartilaginous
cranium. (Figs. 71 and 217.) The nerves to the third and fourth neuromeres,
hn. and h.n.*, some distance from the brain, fuse to form a single nerve supplying
the first and second lung books and the ventral surface of the body (Fig. 71).
On its way to these organs, it passes over the ventral surface of the liver, to which
it possibly gives branches. The anterior hemal nerve of the first vagus neuromere,
hn.* rans close to the coxal gland, and dividing into numerous branches, is lost
on the surface of a thick, peritoneum-like membrane. The posterior nerve,
hn.* extends along the arthroideal membrane, supplying numerous sense organs
on the lateral and the hemal surface of the abdomen. The fourth vagus nerve,
h.n.* supplies the skin and the longitudinal muscles on the ventral surface of the
abdomen.

IV. NERVES OF THE BRANCHIENCEPHALON.

The branchial neuromeres differ from those of the brain in that they remain
separate through life. Their nerves are noteworthy for their association with the
respiratory muscles, the heart, and the intestine.

Limulus.

The Branchial Nerves.—In Limulus, the branchial, or neural nerves, contain
both motor and sensory fibers. They arise from large ganglia on the posterior
neural surface of the neuromeres; on entering the gills they divide into three branches.
(Fig. 82.) The external branch, eb.2. supplies the abductor muscles and the skin
on the anterior lateral surface of the appendage. The median branch g.n.
supplies the adductor muscles and the gill books. The internal branch 7.bn.
supplies the skin and muscles in the terminal portion of the appendage.

THE NERVES OF THE BRANCHIENCEPHALON. 103

The Hamal Nerves (Figs. 59 and 70), arise from the anterior margin of
the neuromere and extend outward over the neural surface of the abdominal
muscles. ‘They divide into five principal branches; one goes to the enteron, one
to the longitudinal abdominal muscles, one to the branchio-thoracic muscles,
one to the heart, and one to the integument.

Cran.

rost.

Fic. 76.—Side view of the brain, endocranium, alimentary canal, and principal vascular channels in Limulus; semi
diagrammatic.
Fic. 77.—Same, showing the relation of the compound branchio-thoracic, or hypobranchial nerve to the hemal
nerves of the vagus and branchial-neuromeres. Semi-diagrammatic.
Fic. 78.—Same, showing the relation of the segmental cardiac nerves, s.c.1.6-13, to the heart and to the vagus and
branchial neuromeres. Semi-diagrammatic,

The Enteric Nerves.—In Limulus, the enteric nerves are intimately associated
with the nerves to the longitudinal abdominal and hemo-neural muscles. The
enteric nerves form a plexus which covers the entire mesenteron and the plexus
is united with the roots of all the hemal nerves, from the sixth to the sixteenth, by
paired rami communicantes. (Fig. 59 i714.) Those from the sixth and seventh
neuromeres pass through the foramina in the posterior lateral wall of the
endocranium. (Figs. 597° and 218.)

104 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

The rami from the sixth thoracic, the chilarial, and opercular neuromeres
mingle with a plexus of nerves distributed over the longitudinal abdominal muscles}
from there branches pass forward, ramifying over the surface of the mesenteron
as far as the stomodeum.

In the branchial neuromeres, the nerves supplying the longitudinal abdominal
muscles and the intestine are separate. The former arise from the anterior side
of the hemal nerve root (Fig. 60, /.ab.), and the latter from the posterior side.
In the more posterior neuromeres, the intestinal branches gradually shift their
point of origin from the root of the hemal nerve to the median margin of the neu-
romere. In the branchial segments, the intestinal rami send a small branch to
the corresponding hemo-neural muscle.

The enteric nerves appear to represent the initial stages of the sympathetic

Fic. 79.—Muscles and distribution of nerves in the third leg of Limulus, from the anterior side. 1-cox., Coxo-
podite, or first joint; 2-bas., basipodite, or second joint; 3-isc., ischiopodite, or third joint; 4-car., mer., fused car-
popodite and meropodite, or fourth joint; 5-pro., propodite, or fifth joint; 6-dac., dactylopodite, or sixth joint; apo.,
apodeme.

Musctezs: 32 and 0, Plastro-coxal muscles inserted upon anterior side of entocoxite; 3¢ and 3¢, tergo-coxal
muscles inserted upon anterior side of entocoxite; ¢.2-6, extensors of second to sixth joints; f.2-6, flexors of second
to sixth joints; fm, flexor of inner manible.

NERVEs: a.e.n., Anterior ento-coxal nerve; br., brain; ¢.p.n., external pedal nerve; h., hemal branch of in
tegumentary nerve; /.n.’, hamal nerve; in.n.’, integumentary branch; i.p.n., internal pedal nerve; m.e.n., median en-
coxal nerve; m.n., mandibular nerves; #., neural branch of integumentary nerve; u.n.3, neural nerve; p.e.n.,
posterior ento-coxal nerve,

system of vertebrates. It is a noteworthy fact that in Limulus the anterior cranial
nerves are not directly united with the enteric plexus by segmental communicating
branches. The most anterior connecting branch that is recognizable belongs to
the ninth cranial neuromere, resembling, in this respect, the well known condition
in vertebrates.

The Longitudinal Abdominal Muscles and Nerves.—The longitudinal
abdominal muscles arise from the posterior hemal side of the endocranium and
pass backward, giving slips to each pair of the abdominal entapophases and to
the abdominal endochondrites. (Fig. 75.)

The muscles are provided with arich nerve plexus, extending their whole length.

THE HYPO-BRANCHIAL MUSCLES AND NERVES. 105

(Figs. 57,59,/.ab.) The fibers arise from small branches of the sixth to the sixteenth
hemal nerves. The branches are given off from the anterior side of the hemal
nerve, close to the cord. The neurones lie on the opposite side of the next anterior
neuromere, with those that supplythe branchio-thoracic muscles. (Fig. 60, D,/.ab.)
In the seventh and eighth metameres, the plexus appears to be continuous with
that going to the intestine.

The General Cutaneous Nerves are largely, if not wholly, sensory. They
extend over the surface of the branchial plastron, dividing into numerous branches
on the margin. (Figs. 59, 70, g.cut.) The fibers that enter into these branches
probably form the second root, h.r.? (Fig. 61.)

Cardiacs.—For a description of the segmental cardiacs, see p. 200.

The Branchio-thoracic, or Hypo-branchial Muscles and Nerves.

The hypo-branchial muscle is a large compound muscle derived from the
eighth to thirteenth metameres inclusive. The neural end of each component is
separate and terminates in a tendinous infolding of the ectoderm at the base of
its corresponding appendage. The hemal ends form a single massive muscle
which shifts its position a long ways forward into the hemal region of the thorax,
where it is attached to the inner surface of the shield, in front of the anterior end
of the heart and the forebrain. (Fig. 78, B.)

The muscle aids in the performance of the complicated respiratory move-
ments, drawing the bases of the gills forward and upward; it also aids in flexing
the thorax on the branchial section of the body.

The hypo-branchial nerve’ forms a great longitudinal trunk extending over
the neural surface of the muscle. (Figs. 59 and 77, b.th.n.) It receives its fibers
from the eighth to the fourteenth hemal nerves, via short communicating
branches. It is, therefore, to be regarded as a compound nerve formed by the
united branches of at least seven segmental nerves. For the greater part of its
course, it forms a compact longitudinal trunk, giving off at regular intervals
branches to the proximal ends of the muscle slips, near their tendinous at-
tachment to the base of the gills. At its anterior end, it breaks up into many
branches that are distributed through the single muscle into which the six
separate muscles merge. Onenerve separates from the anterior end of the main
trunk and supplies the inter-tergal, or arthro-tergal, muscle. (Fig. 77, i.t.)

The nerve fibers arise from clusters of large D neurones lying on the opposite
side of the cord, on the posterior margin of the neuromere, in front of the one
where the nerve enters the cord. (Fig. 60.) The very large axones cross in the
posterior hemal commissure and pass backward, as a conspicuous bundle of
large nerve tubes, /.7.°, to the hemal nerve root. Some of the fibers go to the
longitudinal abdominal nerves, but the main bundle passes on with the hemal
nerve, leaving it farther on, to enter the main hypobranchial.

The remarkable condition of the hypobranchial muscles and nerves of
Limulus is, no doubt, one that has its counterpart in other arachnids. At present,

' Lateral Sympathetic of Patten and Redenbaugh.

106 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

practically nothing is known about the anatomy of these muscles and nerves in
other invertebrates.

In Limulus, the fact that is specially noteworthy is that the six originally
vertical components of the branchio-thoracic muscle have been converted into a
nearly horizontal, or longitudinal, compound muscle, thereby destroying all
correspondence between the metamerism of the neural and hemal surfaces as far
as this muscle is concerned.

The hypo-branchial muscle, by this change in position, gains in effectiveness
as a respiratory and flexor muscle, but it would be a mistake, I believe, to accept

Fic. $0.—Muscles and distribution of the nerves in the sixth leg of Limulus, from the anterior side, 1-cox.,
Coxopodite, or first joint; 2-bas., basipodite, or second joint; 3-isc., ischiopodite, or third joint; 4-car., mer., fused
carpopodite and meropodite, or fourth joint; 5-pro., propodite, or fifth joint; 6-dac., dactylopodite, or sixth joint;
apo., apodeme; b7., brain.

Muscuzs: 6a and 6b, Plastro-coxal muscles inserted upon anterior side of entocoxite; 6c and 6d, tergo-coxal
muscles inserted upon anterior side of entocoxite; ¢.2-7, extensors of second to seventh joints; f.2-7, flexors of second
to seventh joints; i.m., inter-tergal muscle.

NERVES: a.e.n., Anterior entocoxal nerve; ¢.p.n., external pedal nerve; h., hemal branch of integumentary
nerve; h.n.6, hemal nerve; i.x.°, intestinal nerve; in.n.5, integumentary branch of hemal nerve; 7.p.n., interna] pedal
nerve; l.c.n., lateral cardiac nerve; m.c.n., median cardiac nerve; m.e.n., median ento-coxal nerve or flabellar nerve;
mm,, mandibular nerve; »., neural branch of integumentary nerve; ».1..6, neural nerve; p., pericardium; p.e.n.,
posterior ento-coxal nerve; s.c.n.6, segmental cardiac nerves.

that as a primary cause of the change in position, or as an explanation for the
existence of that particular function. The real reason lies deeper, and is to be
seen in those changes that have gradually reduced the volume of the hemal organs
in the anterior head region. This atrophy or reduction of the hemal surface of
the head during the early embryonic periods, inevitably draws the hemal structures
of the post-cephalic metameres forward, and is the initial cause of that forward

VAGAL AND HYPO-BRANCHIAL NERVES. 107

displacement and condensation that we have just described in the hemal ends of
the hypo-branchial muscles.

This condition is a very ancient one, for these very muscles, in this position,
no doubt cause that folding of the thorax onto the abdomen which is so common
in trilobites. I have seen the same thing in Bunodes, very much to my astonish-
ment. For sections of specimens that appeared to be headless, showed that the
cephalo-thorax was present, but doubled over so as to lie with its neural surface
flat against the neural surface of the branchial region.

The general trend of the branchio-thoracic nerves no doubt has been deter-
mined by these morphological changes in the muscles; but the union of these
several nerves into a common trunk is to be regarded as an expression of the
tendency to gain simplicity by the merging of several separate agents, performing
the same function, into a single one.

V. RELATION OF THE VAGAL AND Hypo-BRANCHIAL NERVES IN ARACHNIDS TO
THOSE IN VERTEBRATES.

The entire system of nerves belonging to the vagal and branchial regions in
the arachnids, represents the initial stages in the evolution of the vagal and bran-
chial complex in vertebrates. We can already distinguish in the arachnids the
beginning of that remarkable segregation of
similar components into compound nerves,
that in the vertebrates has given rise to the
branchial, hypoglossal, cardiac, visceral, and
lateral line nerves; and the beginning of that
readjustment in the position of the terminals
that has given to each set of components their
characteristic distribution and direction of
growth. (Figs. 57, 58.)

The branchio-thoracic muscles and nerves
of Limulus are clearly comparable with the
hypoglossal nerves and muscles of vertebrates.
In both vertebrates and arachnids, the nerves Fic. 81.—Muscles and nerves of the chi-
arise: a. from a large number of post-vagal [7% of Mimules, from anterior side. | “pe an

pendages are revolved outward about 45°.

neuromeres (five branchial and one oper- b.c.7, Capsuliginous bar, or branchial cartilage
of the chilaria.

cular); 6. they are either hemal nerves (ven- Muscuns: 7@¢; Plastroscoxal: 7 f and ¢;
tral roots) or branches of hzemal nerves; c. they ‘er#0-comals 4... inter-tergal; up..m.7, veno-
pericardiac.

are united to form a compound longitudinal

trunk, terminating in an extensive plexus; d. the distal ends of both muscles and
nerves migrate a long distance forward onto the anterior hemal surface of the
head, thus causing the nerves to follow their characteristic U-shaped course, and
disguising the original relation between the metameric arrangement of organs on
the neural and hemal surfaces; e. the distribution of the neural nerves (branchial
arch nerves) is not affected by these changes.

108 PERIPHERAL NERVES AND GANGLIA.

In the arachnids (scorpion), four abdominal neuromeres have migrated for-
ward to unite with the hindbrain. Of these four, the last one is a true branchial
neuromere.

In vertebrates, all the branchial neuromeres have fused with the hind-
brain, probably in some such manner as that indicated in Fig. 68. The
hypobranchial nerves united to form the hypoglossus, having the peculiar distri-
bution indicated above, although in a more exaggerated form. The neural roots

ol,
%

btm TRF |

Fic. 82.—Muscles and distribution of nerves in the first gill of Limulus. The appendage is flexed upon the
abdomen, and is seen from the neural side. a.e.9, Abdominal endochondrite; b.c.8 and bc.9, branchial cartilages
of operculum and first gill; 7.J., inner lobe of gill; m.J, median lobe of gill o.J., outer lobe of gill.

Muscies: a.b.m.9, Abductor muscle of gill; b.t.m., branchio-thoracic muscles; e.b.m.9, external branchial
muscle; i.b.m.9, internal branchial muscle; i.1.1., inner lobe muscles; 1.a.m., longitudinal abdominal muscles; o.1.m.,
outer lobe muscles.

NERVES: a.g., First abdominal ganglion; e.b.n., external branch of neural nerve; g.n., branch of neural nerve
supplying gill book; h.n.9, heemal nerves; i.b.n., internal branch of neural nerve; i.n.9, intestinal nerve (two branches
are shown, a posterior and an anterior one); in.n.,9 integumentary branch of hemal nerve; I.s.n., hypo-bran-
chial nerve; m.b.n., median branch of neural nerve; m.n. 9, neural nerve; s.c.n.,9 segmental cardiac nerve;
v.c., ventral cord.

united with one another, and with the posterior neural roots of the vagus, as they
have to a certain extent in the scorpion, to form the series of nerves supplying the
gill arches. ‘The nerves supplying the important sense organs in the group of
modified vagal appendages, gave rise to the lateral line nerve; and the combined
cardiac and intestinal components, that in the arachnids are confined to this
region, gave rise to the corresponding elements in the vertebrates.

We need not carry this comparison any farther, for the conditions are ex-
tremely complicated, and there are many variations peculiar to each class. But
that this entire region has undergone the same kind of changes in vertebrates that

VAGAL AND HYPO-BRANCHIAL NERVES. 10g

we now see taking place in the arachnids is, I believe, beyond question. The
fact that the branchial appendages in arachnids, as nearly as we may determine,
belong to the same group of metameres as in vertebrates, and the fact that the
total number of branchial segments in Limulus and the merostomes is very
nearly the same as in vertebrates, 7.¢c., seven appendages, four or five of which are
gill bearing, as against five or seven gill bearing arches for vertebrates—is sug-
gestive, but perhaps of less significance than the fact that in both cases, there is a
much greater forward growth and concrescence of the structures on the hemal
surface than of those on the neural, thus producing that apparent lack of harmony
in the serial arrangement of nerves, neuromeres, gill arches, and myotomes, so
disturbing to the student of vertebrate cephalogenesis.

The conditions become still more significant when we recall that they are the
inevitable results of very remote factors that are common to both types, such as
the absence of lateral plates to the mesodermic segments in the anterior part of
the head, the gradually increasing size of the yolk sphere, and the precocious
development of the forebrain.

CHAPTER VII.

GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

In the arachnids, we may recognize three main groups of sense organs;
primitive segmental, special cutaneous, and general cutaneous.

a. The primitive segmental sense organs include the median and the lateral
eyes, the olfactory and the auditory organs. With the exception of the last named,
they are so highly developed and have been so long established that they and
their nerve centers constitute the very foundations of the forehead and forebrain.
b. The special cutaneous sense organs include the gustatory buds, slime buds,
and other chemotactic, or tactile organs that have well defined nerves, ganglia,
and central terminals, and that are located in definite fields, or areas, such as
the coxal spurs, chilaria, pectines, flabellum, etc. They attain their highest
development in the midbrain and hindbrain regions. c. The general cutaneous
sense organs may be of the same nature as the special cutaneous, but they are
irregularly distributed, and without separate, well defined nerves or ganglia;
we also include in this category temperature organs and free nerve endings.
They are supplied mainly by the subdermal plexus formed from the terminal
branches of the neural, but especially of the hemal nerves. These nerves may
arise from all the main divisions of the neuron except the forebrain.

I. GENERAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

Temperature Organs.—Reaction to changes in temperature in the lower
animals is probably much more delicate and more generally exercised than has
been suspected. The temperature sense is not dependent on the location of its
organs in a particular part of the body, for changes of temperature are diffusely
distributed, and are not likely to affect the animal at one point more than another.
An effective response results in the transfer of the whole body to surroundings of
a different temperature; thus the temperature organs primarily control them ove-
ments of the animal as a whole, or its migrations, or distribution in space.

One would hardly suspect that such a heavily armored animal as Limulus
would be very sensitive to changes in temperature, yet that such is the case may be
easily demonstrated. When placed on its back and allowed to become perfectly
quiet, it may be fanned, or the surface of the carapace, or the gills, or the legs,
may be touched with an object the same temperature as the air, without causing
any reflexes; but the instant any of these parts are touched ever so gently with the
finger, or if water a little warmer or colder than the surrounding air falls on them,

IIo

TEMPERATURE AND GUSTATORY ORGANS. IItl

or even if one gently breathes on the gills and under surface of the body, the animal
at once becomes greatly agitated.

The most sensitive areas are the margins of the carapace, and especially the
margins of the gill chamber along which the main current of water passes to the
gills, and the anterior surface of the branchial appendages themselves.

We cannot positively identify the temperature organs. They appear to be
short, spike-like projections in which terminates a small tuft of sensory cells.
They are distributed over all parts of the carapace and are supplied by the terminal
plexus formed by the branching of the hemal nerves.

They are seen to best advantage in the gills of young Limuli, 2-4 in. long.
In those parts of the gills that are most sensitive to heat, 7.e., the outer surface of
the terminal joints of the exopodites, one may see, in successful methylene blue
preparation, a loose subdermal nerve plexus continuous with small clusters of
spindle shaped sensory cells. From each cluster a very fine fiber extends outward,
through a chitenous tubule, to a short spike situated on the outer surface of the
gill. (Fig. 86, A, zs.)

* * Bo k * * * * *

Free Nerve-Ends.—In the abdominal appendages that have been injected
with methylene blue, large nerve branches may be seen going to the soft integument
around the joints of the endopodites. Each branch ends in a group of bipolar
or multipolar cells; from them arise many branching fibers that form a rich termi-
nal meshwork, lying in or on the ectoderm, but without association with any
specialized cells. (Figs. 86 B, 87.)

The hyphe of a parasitic fungus sometimes ramify in all directions through
or over the surface of the chiten. They usually take on an intensely blue
stain, and at first sight might be mistaken for nerve fibers.

II. Spectra, CuTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

The Gustatory Organs of Limulus.—Gustatory organs are widely dis-
tributed over the neural surface of the head, but they are most highly developed
in the appendages that come in frequent contact with the food. In other words,
the principal aggregations of these organs are located around the mouth in segment-
ally arranged fields. This condition explains their remarkable distribution in verte-
brates. There they are primarily arranged in several radiating series on the top of
the head, an inconveniently long distance from the present vertebrate mouth, but
close to the central areas where the old invertebrate mouth was located. (Fig. 89.)

The gustatory organs have been most carefully studied in Limulus, and they
form the principal basis for my conclusions. They are abundant in the mandibles
of the thoracic appendages, except the first and last pairs, and in the tips of the
thoracic appendages. Their presence in the mandibles is indicated by a most
beautiful series of reflexes, first described by me in 1892. Organs similar in

II2 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

structure to the ones we are about to describe occur in other parts of the head
and trunk, but stimulation of them does not produce any recognizable reflex.

a. Reactions to Stimulation.—lIf an adult Limulus be placed on its back, it
soon becomes quiet, except that after long intervals the gills are raised and lowered
afew times. If, during the quiescent condition, the jaw-like spurs, or mandibles,
at the base of the legs are gently rubbed with some hard object, such as a piece
or wood, glass, or iron; or if water the temperature of the surrounding medium be
gently poured over them; or if the animal be vigorously fanned, or loud noises
be made near it, only slight, aimless movements of the legs or abdomen are pro-
duced; usually none at all. But if a very small piece of clam, not more than two
or three millimeters long, is gently laid on the surface, say of the third mandible
on the left side, care being taken not to touch any other parts, that leg will be
repeatedly raised and the tip bent toward the mouth, while its mandible will
move back and forth, alternating with the leg movement. Meantime all the other
mandibles and appendages are motionless. One may start in this way one append-
age after the other (except the first and last pairs), until all of them, first on one side
and then on the other, are in action.

If all the jaws are stimulated with food at the same time the normal chewing
reaction takes place as follows: The second and fourth pairs of mandibles move
in unison inward toward the median plane, and downward toward the mouth;
then back again in the reverse order. When they are farthest from the mouth
the corresponding legs (except the second pair in both males and females) are
quickly raised, flexed, and the tips carried toward the mouth, where they remain
an instant, and then fall back on to the under side of the carapace; the corre-
sponding jaw movement then begins again. The third and fifth pairs of append-
ages and the corresponding jaws work in unison in the same manner, but they
alternate with those of the second and fourth. At intervals these movements
cease, the abdomen is raised, and the stout crushing mandibles on the sixth pair
of appendages, which’ have heretofore remained motionless, are slowly closed with
great force, as though to crush some object too large to be swallowed whole, or
to kill some struggling prey. These powerful jaws then slowly relax their con-
vulsive grasp, and the chewing movements are resumed.

All these movements go on with the greatest precision and regularity, so that
the food that was placed on the jaws is forced into the mouth and down the
cesophagus.

A drop of clam water is sufficient to start the whole reaction, which is per-
formed in the same manner as during the actual process of eating.

If wads of blotting paper are used, wet with ammonia or picric acid, the
chewing movements are reversed, and the offensive object may be snapped up by
the chelicere and rejected.

Strong smelling food held close to the mouth, or to the jaws, produces no
effect, although chewing movements are instantly produced when the jaws are
touched by it.

GUSTATORY ORGANS. FLABELLUM. II3°

Tf the mandibles on one side are stimulated, the chelicera of that side, al-
though not stimulated itself, extends rigidly backward, or waves aimlessly back
and forth snapping its chelz and thrusting the tip of the appendage into the mouth.
If the jaws on the opposite side are now stimulated, the chelicera on that side
begins to work also.

The chewing reactions can only be produced by stimulating the spines on
the mandibles, or the smooth, under surface of the inner mandibular spur. Stimu-
lating the skin around the mouth, or in it, does not produce the chewing reflexes.
If the mandibles are amputated, no reaction in
the leg so treated occurs. If the spines are shaved
off, the reaction is produced only after strong stimu-
lation, or by stimulating the under surface of the
inner mandible.

It is thus evident that we are dealing with true
taste organs, and that they must be located in the
mandibular spines.

b. Structure of the Gustatory Organs.—The
mandibular spines are thickly covered with minute
pores arranged in verticallines. (Fig. 83,4.) The
pores lead into canals, each of which contains a
long, slender chitenous tubule that terminates flush
with the outer surface. The chitenous tubule
contains an exceedingly fine, hair-like prolongation
of a gustatory cell. Toward its inner end, the
tubule expands into a peculiar spindle, beyond
which lies the nucleated cell body. The gustatory
cells are united into spindle-shaped clusters, each
cluster corresponding to a single line of pores.
The central ends of the cells are continued as nerve
fibers into the main gustatory nerve, which extends
over the surface of the pedal ganglia, through the megan: Aes ane
gustatory tracts, to the common centers in the of Limulus, showing linear arrangement

i « a of the gustatory pores; B, longitudinal
cheliceral lones and. hemispheres, (FigsG5-104.) ccction of w gustatory spine. showing

the gustatory cells, g.s.c., spindles, sp,

2k ok * 2k 2k and chitenous end tubes, sch.t. highly

=} magnified. C.D, Details of surface

The flabellum is a large spatulate organ, one “"™!7*'

to one and one-half inches long, attached to the outer side of the coxal joint

of the sixth leg. It lies in a channel leading into the respiratory chamber, so

that the water going to the gills passes over its flat anterior surface. The latter

is perforated with innumerable canals that afford an opening for the elements
of the underlying sense organ, the most voluminous one in the whole body.

Each canal contains the outer end of a pear-shaped sense bud composed

of eight to twelve, or more, sense cells. The buds are loosely united into small

8

I14 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

groups that are surrounded by anill defined sheath and supplied by a single
nerve. (Fig. 84.)

The slender outer ends of the sensory cells unite to form a dense, conical
body, enclosed in a bulb-like enlargement at the base of a chitenous tubule.
Before uniting, the cell ends become especially distinct and each one develops a
minute, bead-like swelling.

Fies. 84 and 85.—A, Section through the anterior surface of the flabellum of an adult Limulus, showing four
flabellar sense organs—von Rath’s preparation; B, section throngh one of the gill warts of an adult Limulus, show-
ing the peculiar bell-shaped terminal “ hairs’ and the associated cluster of sensory cells and chitenous tubules—von
Rath’s preparation; C, terminal hair of a gill wart, more highly magnified; D, diagram of a slime bud, Limulus; E,
taste bud from the pharynx of an embryo Catastomus (after Johnsion); F, a taste organ from the skin of an
adult Lampetra (ayter Johnston); G, a neuromast from the skin of Catastomus (after Johnston); H, diagram of an
arachnid sense bud.

The apex of the cone extends outward as an exceedingly minute fiber, through
a small chitenous tubule, probably as far as the outer surface of the flabellum.
Between the slender necks of the organs are a few elongated cells, and similar
ones, but smaller, are seen in the canals through which the chitenous tubules
pass to the exterior.

BRANCHIAL WARTS. II5

The thick epidermis is heavily pigmented, and pigment is frequently seen
in the body of the sensory cells.

The sense buds are so numerous that their inner ends are crowded together
several rows deep. The inner surface of the sensory field is very vascular, and
the narrow crevices between the organs are often crowded with blood corpuscles.

The posterior wall of the flabellum, in marked contrast to the anterior, con-
tains few or no sensory perforations, and the epidermis is thin, nearly colorless,
and with few blood-vessels.

The flabellum is supplied by a very large nerve the root of which passes over
the neural surface of the sixth pedal ganglion and joins the main gustatory tracts.
It does not differ from the fascicles coming from the gustatory cells in the man-
dibles, except that itis larger. It appears to form the greater part of the conspic-
uous neuropile enlargements seen on the median face of each crus. (Fig. 65.)

The flabellum doubtless serves to test the quality of the water that is drawn
into the gill chamber. I have not been able to detect any characteristic reactions
when it is stimulated.

The flabellum probably represents the exopodite of the sixth pair of append-
ages. Traces of similar organs are seen for a short time at the base of the other
appendages. (Fig. 141.)

* * wk * * *k * ok *

The Branchial Warts.—The branchial warts are blister-like elevations about
four mm. in diameter, located on the endopodites of the branchial appendages.
They are covered by a soft, bluish chiten, and lie either folded over the margin,
half on each side of the gill, or in pairs, one member on the anterior, the other
opposite to it on the posterior surface of the appendage. (Fig. 82.)

The outer surface is thickly and uniformly covered with goblet, or bell-
shaped hairs, deeply set in conical recesses. There are two distinct sizes, evenly
distributed in about the proportion of five small ones to one large. The large
bell-shaped hairs lie over the outer ends of large canals which contain spirally
coiled, and very distinct chitenous tubules. (Fig. 85, Br. and C.)

The canals are colorless and, except for the tubule, appear to be empty.
They do not contain blackened fibers or nuclei such as occur in the flabellar
canals. The tubule springs from a small, fusiform cluster of sensory cells lying
well below the surface. Thick nerve bundles, remarkable for the large ganglion
cells scattered over them, leave the inner ends of the cell clusters and uniting with
the other bundles form a loose nerve plexus, which is continuous with terminal
branches of the branchial nerve.

The smaller goblet hairs are without visible tubules, and their faint, under-
lying canals do not perforate the outer chitenous layers. They do not appear
to be connected with nerves.

The inner surface of the flexible chiten that covers the branchial warts ex-
tends inward in the form of thin, vertical walls that form a coarse, polygonal

116 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

network when seen in surface views. They are covered with a thick epithelium,
giving them in sections a false appearance of sensory infoldings.

Between two opposing organs is a loose, areolar tissue and a conspicuous
venous chamber.

These organs are clearly of a very special kind. In addition to their unusual
naked eye appearance, they are peculiar in the shape of the terminal goblet hairs;
in the absence of cells or fibers in the underlying canals; in the thick walled, spiral,
chitenous tubule; in the ganglionated nerve branches, and in their inflated elastic
walls that lie on opposite sides of the appendage.

Their peculiar structure indicates that they may be provisionally regarded
as a kind of pressure guage which aids in the control of the heart beat and the
respiratory movements.

ok * xk *k ok * * * *

The Slime Buds.—Slime buds are spherical masses of glandular cells, mingled
with nervous or sensory ones, and richly supplied with nerves.

They vary greatly in their grade of development, and in the relative number
and size of their sensory and glandular cells. They are scattered over the whole
surface of the body, but are especially abundant in certain regions, or areas, that
are known to be highly sensitive.

While at first sight they appear to be merely integumentary glands, closer
examination raises many important questions that are difficult to answer, as, for
example, in regard to their function, minute structure, and development.

It is probable that they play an important part in the reactions toward certain
kinds of stimuli, but whether their secretions serve to protect the adjacent
nerve buds against excessive stimulation (which seems to me very improbable), or
as absorbers and intensifiers of certain substances, has not been demonstrated.

A familiar illustration of a similar condition in vertebrates is the association
of slime, or mucous cells with the sense organs of the lateral line. There is also
an intimate association of mucous and sensory cells in many molluscs, i.c., in
Lima, Arca Noe, and in the tentacles of Haliotis.

The facts that have special significance for our problems are as follows:

1. Secretion of mucus. When small Limuli are violently stimulated, the
slime buds discharge an abundance of mucus, and, if the surface of the shell
has been previously wiped dry, it may be seen to collect in small drops over each
pore. When allowed to accumulate, it forms a thick slimy covering to the whole
surface.

2. Distribution. The slime buds are very numerous in certain well defined
areas which, from their location and abundant nerve supply, have every indication
of being highly sensory, as, for example, in the olfactory organs, in the mandibular
spurs of Limulus, and the maxillaria of the second and third pairs of thoracic
appendages in the scorpion.

3. Innervation. These groups of slime buds are innervated by special nerves,

SLIME BUDS. 117

or by the same nerves that supply the adjacent gustatory organs. Those that are
scattered over the general surface of the body are supplied by branches from a sub-
cutaneous plexus, formed by the ramifications of the general cutaneous branches
of the hemal nerves. In the appendages, the subdermal plexus arises from the
general cutaneous branches of the neural nerves.

4. Structure. Slime buds are found in many crustacea and arachnids, and,
although but little is known about them, they appear to have a similar structure
to those in Limulus.

The slime buds differ in appearance in different regions, and apparently at
different times. They are generally spherical or oval, with a small central space

rete a NE

mL,

i Oa
is Pets Oe 2

nena all

Fic. 86.—Anterior, or outer, surface of the branchial appendage of a young Limulus, two inches long. A, a
portion of the subdermal plexus of nerve fibers, with clusters of bipolar sense cells whose outer ends terminate in
minute chitenous spikes; A, one of the sense buds, more highly magnified, with its chitenous tubule, ch.t., that
conveys the terminal fibers to the surface; B, two apparently isolated multipolar ganglion cells, lying just below,
or in, the surface ectoderm of the branchial appendage; C, four multipolar ganglion cells from the same region,
Methylene blue.

from which a chitenous tubule leads to the exterior. (Fig. 88.) This tubule
may or may not be convoluted near its origin, but it generally terminates in a
straight delicate tubule that cannot be distinguished from those covering the
outer ends of the gustatory and temperature-cells. All the tubules are shed with
the old shell at ecdysis. They may be seen protruding a considerable distance from
the inner surface of the cast off shell that have been cleaned with boiling potash.

The slime buds contain at least two different kinds of cells, namely, true
slime cells, which may constitute the greater part of the organ, and one or more
sensory cells. The slime cells vary greatly in appearance. In the typical ol-
factory and mandibular slime buds, they are irregularly conical or cylindrical,
their walls are sharply defined, and they contain, at their pointed central ends, a
mass of refractive colorless spherules. The enlarged peripheral ends of the cells,

118 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

in which is located the small nucleus, may be finely granular, staining a dark
gray or bluish-black in von Rath’s fluid. (Fig. 88.)

Each slime bud contains a single ganglionic or sensory cell, distinguished
from all the others by its large size, dark, finely granular protoplasm and indis-
tinct outline. This cell appears to be larger and more distinct in the mandibular
slime buds than it is in the olfactory buds.

Between the outer ends of the slime cells there are minute, rod-like bodies
with a dilatation at their inner ends. They have the appearance, under some
conditions, of being minute sensory cells, but I have not been able to fully satisfy
myself that such is the case. In von Rath’s fluid, they become very black,
and in some cases hair-like processes appear to project from them into the cavity
of the slime bud, where they unite to form a small star-like body. (Fig. 85, D.)

In some cases, the buds are greatly distended and the cells appear nearly

Fic. 88. Fic. 87.

Fic. 87.—A cluster of ganglion cells terminating in a sub-dermal plexus of anastomosing fibers; from the soft skin
between the joints of the endopodites of the branchial appendages of a young Limulus. Methylene blue.
Fic. 88.—Two slime buds grom the olfactory region of an adult Limulus—von Rath's prepration. a. Groups of cells
of unknown significance; c.c, central coagulum resting on hair-like projections.

colorless and empty, as though after a certain period of activity they were about
to degenerate.

New slime buds, that have arisen de novo from the indifferent ectoderm,
or by the division of the existing buds, appear in the older stages.

5. In the vertebrates, there is a similar association of sensory and mucous
cells in the lateral line organs. For a long time it was assumed that the lateral
line canals were primarily slime producing organs, and nothing more. When
the sense organs in the canals were discovered, the associated mucous cells were
apparently forgotten.

In the lower vertebrates, the typical taste organs form small clusters of sensory
cells, resembling in structure and innervation the taste organs and the flabellar
organs in Limulus. (Fig. 85, #.) The typical lateral line organs, or neuromasts,
consist of short, hair-bearing sense cells, united with longer so-called “supporting,”
or indifferent cells, which may or may not secrete mucous (Maurer). This associa-

SLIME BUDS. 11g

tion of mucous cells and hair cells in one organ is comparable with the association
of sensory and mucous cells in the slime buds of arachnids and in the olfactory
organs of insects (Necrophorus, Dahlgren and Kepner). If the short, rod-like
bodies in Limulus are true sensory cells, then the morphological resemblance
between an arachnid slime bud and a vertebrate neuromast is very striking.
(Figs. 85, D-H.)

According to Maurer, there are some cases in the vertebrates where the
lateral line organs still remain in a condition approaching that in the arachnids,
for he regards the slime buds in Myxine and Bdellostoma as probably representing
modified lateral line organs of Petromyzon. In other words, in Myxine and
Bdellostoma, the mucous sacs are sense buds, in which all or nearly all the cells
secrete mucous.

In the vertebrates, however, the secreting function is usually relegated to
separate cells in the adjacent ectoderm, the ‘‘supporting”’ cells apparently re-
taining their secreting function only in exceptional cases (Maurer). In reply
to an inquiry on this point, Prof. C. Judson Herrick writes me that ‘the line
organs of vertebrates are so exceedingly variable that I would not venture to
generalize, with my present knowledge, on the relation between the sensory and
the mucous cells; but certainly in some cases, and I think asa rule, they are closely
associated. The mucous cells are I think generally absent in the non-sensory
parts of the lining of the canals. As to the function of the mucus, I have hitherto
regarded it as like the mucus of the general body surfaces, protective. But
in view of Parker’s work on the function of the lateral canal sense organs as re-
ceptors for slow vibrations, it may be that the mucus and the cilia of the hair
cells both enter into the formation of the cupula which overlies the lateral line
organs much as in the case of ampulle of the internal ear and that the whole cupula
assists in the stimulus of the sensory cells.”

However, it is clear that we must go farther back than primitive vertebrates
for our explanation. In Limulus, for example, we have the same kind of gland
cells intimately associated with cutaneous sense organs, and it is extremely improb-
able that the abundant mucus there serves either to protect an already practically
impervious covering, or to assist, by slow vibrations, in the stimulation of the
sensory cells.

6. The function of the slime budsin Limulus isnot apparent. The presence
of the mucoid secretion is obvious enough in both vertebrates and arachnids, but
a satisfactory explanation of its purpose is not available; and it is difficult to
account for the rich innervation of these organs in Limulus, or for the presence of
sensory or nerve cells in them, or for their association with other sense organs,
on the ground that they are mucous glands and nothing more.

The only conclusion open to us at present is that first suggested by me in 1889,
namely that in the arachnids and primitive vertebrates, the mucous secretion serves
to absorb certain chemical substances held in solution, and to thus intensify
their action on the nerve ends. This explanation would account for the abund-

120 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

ance of mucous in the olfactory and gustatory organs, and for its absence in the
tactile or auditory ones.

The mandibular slime buds are sufficiently numerous to suggest that they
are in the nature of salivary glands. This, however, does not seem probable, since
there is no way to get the secretions into the mouth with the food; and the mem-
branes immediately within, or surrounding the mouth are entirely devoid of these
organs. Moreover, it is certain that the precisely similar slime buds in the ol-
factory fields, and in the integument of the back or branchial chamber, cannot be
regarded as salivary organs.

7. The slime buds of Limulus and other arachnids are found in segmentally
arranged fields, or groups, that are supplied by special nerves, the most conspicuous
groups being those in the olfactory organ, in the mandibles of the second to the
fifth thoracic appendages, and in the rudimentary vagus appendages (scorpion).
These organs appear at an early embryonic period as thickenings of the ectoderm
and in close association with the cranial ganglia.

The Auditory Organ.—In my first contribution, 1889, I maintained that
the large segmental sense organ, which in Limulus embryos lies opposite the fourth
pair of legs, was the probable forerunner of the vertebrate ear. I see no reason
to change my opinion on this point. Although the evidence in favor of this con-
clusion is not voluminous, it is sufficiently precise as far as it goes. In Limulus,
the organ in question is a large discoidal placode, of a sensory nature (Figs. 131,
140 to 153), strikingly like the auditory placode of vertebrates in its general outward
appearance, in its minute structure, and in the fact that it is located, as nearly as
one may determine, on the same segment of the head, using as a guide either
the history of the oral arches (Figs. 29-34), or the number of the corresponding
brain neuromere. (Fig. 57.)

It is assumed that in the primitive vertebrates this particular placode, which
lies at the head of the posterior division of the thorax, formed a simple, sac-like
infolding, similar to the auditory sac in decapods, and that from this sac developed
the inner ear of vertebrates.

The placode belongs to the same series as the visual and olfactory organs.
(Figs. 140-148, s.o*.) It increases in size up to the time of hatching. During the
early trilobite stage, the cells become slightly pigmented, take on a sensory ap-
pearance, and a lens-like thickening of the overlying chiten is formed over it.
(Fig. 131, B.) The organ disappears completely at the close of the trilobite stage.

That is as far as the evidence goes. There is no evidence that the placode in
Limulus is auditory; or that it is serially homologous with the antennal auditory
organs of decapods, although that is not improbable.

Gaskell regards the flabellum of Limulus, or the pectines of the scorpion, as
the precursor of the vertebrate auditory organ; but they lie much too far back in
the head to be compared with the ear of vertebrates. His description of the
minute structure of the flabellum is very inaccurate, and his intimation that it is

LATERAL LINE ORGANS. 121

an auditory organ, possibly homologous with the pectines of scorpions, is con-
trary to well established facts.

Lateral Line Organs of Vertebrates. Summary and Comparison.—
The lateral line organs of vertebrates consist of several distinct groups that arise
at an early embryonic period from the neural surface of the head. Each line of
organs makes its appearance as.an oval thickening of the ectoderm, located be-
tween the dorsal extremity of a gill arch and the lateral margin of the medullary
plate. (Figs. 26-34.) The thickening gradually extends in a peripheral direc-
tion, and as it does so it separates into a superficial linear series of sense buds
and an accompanying underlying nerve and ganglion. Subsequently an in-
folding of the ectoderm may take place along the line of growth, forming first an
open groove and then a canal, in which the organs are located at regular intervals.
Finally the several canals may unite, forming a continuous system, but each part
that was originally a distinct canal is innervated by a special cranial nerve.
(Fig. 89.)

It has been suggested that the anlage of each canal represents a very ancient
sense organ (the so-called branchial sense organ), but so far as I know, no ex-
planation has been offered for the extraordinary fact that these ancient organs
must have originated, not around or close to the vertebrate mouth, as one would
naturally suppose, but from the opposite or aboral side of the head; and not from
a single anlage, but from several.

This condition, however, is perfectly intelligible as soon as we recognize that
the whole system of taste buds and lateral line organs of vertebrates represents
the thoracic and vagal coxal sense organs of arachnids, which there lie on the neural
surface of the head around the primitive mouth, the latter having closed up and
disappeared in the vertebrates.

When the sense organs of the arachnids are projected on the neural surface
of the cephalothorax, the principal groups, each one containing many organs,
appear as oval or circular areas arranged around the mouth. (Fig. 89, A.) We
may recognize three sets: the gustatory organs and slime buds located side by side
in the thoracic and vagal appendages, and the chemotactic general cutaneous
organs located on the neural flanks of the thoracic and branchial regions, and
supplied by a great longitudinal nerve arising from one of the anterior thoracic
neuromeres, /.n.

Taste buds predominate in the second, third, fourth, and fifth thoracic coxe,
z.e., those immediately surrounding the mouth. Sense cells of the same general
type are abundant in the flabellum and in the vagal appendages, but there they
may serve as tactile organs, or for some other purpose.

The organs of the gustatory-tactile type and the slime buds may arise side
by side from the same anlagen, and they may be supplied by the same nerve
trunks and ganglia. Their later phylogenetic history appears to follow along the
same lines in both cases, but there is apparently a tendency to separate, more and

122 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

more, the two kinds of organs, so that each kind assembles in particular areas
and is supplied with distinct nerves arising from distinct brain tracts. We shall
here refer to the common anlagen of both sets of organs as coxal and vagal sense
organs.

There is a sharp distinction morphologically between the anlagen of the
thoracic organs and those of the vagal region. The thoracic anlagen are always
directed forward and outward and are located well on the sides of-the thorax.
The vagal anlagen are always crowded close to the median line and are directed
backward, approximately parallel with the nerve cord. (Fig. 89.) The location
and direction of growth of these organs is determined by that of the appendages to
which they belong and is prophetic of their condition in vertebrates.

When the oral appendages were transferred to the hemal surface (see Chapter
XV), it is probable that the anlagen of the coxal organs were drawn forward and
outward into a narrow band, each one giving rise to a row, or linear series
of taste organs, the general course or direction of the organs, and the accompany-
ing nerves and ganglia, indicating the path of migration of the corresponding
appendage.

The vagal appendages of the arachnids are always carried backward, relative
to the other parts of the same segments, as shown by the invariable direction of
their nerves and ganglia. The conditions that controlled their movements have
no doubt continued to direct the line of growth of the vagal group of anlagen in
the embryos of their vertebrate descendants.

There is nothing to indicate what conditions determined the backward growth
of the immense longitudinal cutaneous nerve, which in Limulus arises from the
first post-oral neuromere. (Figs. 70, 89, 1.7.)

The embryological history of the lateral line organs in primitive vertebrates
bears out this interpretation. We may recognize there two principal groups of
organs, one lying in front of the auditory organ and belonging to the oral arches,
the other lying behind the auditory organ and belonging to the branchial region
and trunk. The former represent the coxal organs of the arachnid thorax, the
latter, the organs of the vagal appendages. These two groups of organs grow in
the same general direction in the vertebrates that they do in the arachnids, but
they have extended very much farther in the former.

In the vertebrates the several pairs of anlagen tend to run together, and it
is not clear just how many there are in either region, or which ones of those in the
arachnids they represent.

The second, third, fourth, and to a less degree, the fifth pairs of coxal anlagen
en the arachnids are probably in part retained in the vertebrates, forming the
rudiments of lines of canal organs for their corresponding appendages, which
have themselves furnished the basis of the premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular
and hyoid arches. One or more groups of vagal sense organs gave rise to the
lateral lines of the branchial region and the trunk.

ok ok ok * * ok * Bo 2K

LATERAL LINE ORGANS. 123

Let us now consider the several lines of canal organs as they appear in ostra-
coderms and primitive vertebrates.

In the ostracoderms, they undoubtedly occur in the most primitive condition
known in the adult of any vertebrate-like animal.

In Tremataspis (Fig. 236), the organs were apparently located in short, shal-
low surface grooves; in Bothriolepis (Fig. 247), in continuous open grooves.
When expressed in a simple diagrammatic form, the sensory grooves of the ostra-
coderms appear to originate in the occipital region and to radiate from it in the
following lines: There is a main suborbital (Fig. 89, B.), 7.0./., continued for-
ward as the rostral line, r.J., in front of the olfactory organs. In Bothrio-
lepis, a branch line arises from it and extends hemally over the surface of the

Ostralchoderm.

A. B. c. D.

Fic. 89.—Schematic figures showing the location of the lateral and median eye, olfactory, auditory, gusta-
tory, and canal organs, in the arachnids, ostracoderms, arthrodiri, and primitive vertebrates. All figures seen
from the neural surface.

premaxille. A mandibular line is not recognized in any ostracoderm, prob-
ably owing to the small size of the mandibles. There is no true supra-orbital
line, probably owing to the median location of the lateral eyes, although the
short-post- orbital line of Tremataspis and the longer one in Bothriolepis possibly
represent the proximal end of such a line, s.o.l.

The orbital line appears to be continuous with the lateral line of the branchial
region and of the trunk, by means of short glosso-pharyngeal sections, g.p. Judg-
ing from the embryological conditions in vertebrates, this section represents a
separate line, supplied solely by the glosso-pharyngeal nerve. The main lateral
line extends along the branchial region and in Bothriolepis may be traced for a
short distance on to the trunk. There are two accessory dorso-branchial lines
in Tremataspis and one in Bothriolepis.

I24 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS.

In the Arthrodira (Fig. 89, C), the most important advance is in the appear-
ance of a distinct supra-orbital line, s.0./., extending forward between the now
widely separate lateral eyes; and a distinct hyomandibular line h.ml. extending
toward, and probably onto, the greatly enlarged mandibles. In the arthrodira
the neuromasts apparently never form a series of separate dots and dashes, but
lie in continuous grooves of varying depth.

In true vertebrates, no important changes or new conditions arise. The sev-
eral lines may be deeply infolded and joined at their proximal ends to form a
united series of canals, with the sense organs located in them at regular intervals,
suggesting the interrupted surface grooves of the ostracoderms. (Fig. 89,
B and D.)

CHAPTER VIII.

LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

I. THE DIFFERENT KINDS oF EYES IN ARTHROPODS AND VERTEBRATES.

Since the principal facts in their embryonic development became known,
it has been generally assumed that the vertebrate eyes originated inside the brain
chamber, and that the retina was a highly specialized part of the brain wall.

There are fundamental objections to this interpretation, namely: a. it reverses
the usual order of histological development, for nerve cells are to be regarded as
specialized sensory cells, not vice versa; and D. it fails to establish any connection
or relation between the eyes of vertebrates and those that are almost universally
present, and often highly developed, in the invertebrates. In fact, it neither ex-
plains how the eyes got into the brain chamber from without, nor under what
conditions they developed ‘“‘de novo” from within.

The arthropod theory is not open to these objections, for we shall show that
the evolution of a cerebral eye has already taken place in the arachnids, and that
the principal steps in the process are recorded there in great detail.

Eyes of Arthropods.

In the arthropods, we may recognize four types of eyes, namely: paired lar-
val ocelli; parietal eyes; frontal ocelli, or stemmata; and the lateral or compound
eyes.

The larval ocelli, of which there may be six pairs, two for each of the fore-
brain segments, are present in the active larve of most insects, but disappear
during the metamorphosis (coleoptera, lepidoptera, neuroptera, hymenoptera).
They are cup-like infoldings of the ectoderm, with upright or horizontal retinal
cells or rods. In the insects, the retinal cells are never completely inverted,
and the ocelli never form unpaired eyes enclosed in a common chamber or vesicle.

The Parietal Eye.—In the crustacea and arachnids, two pairs of ocelli unite
to form an unpaired ocellar vesicle, or parietal eye. The ocellar placodes remain
more or less distinct and form the side walls of the dilated anterior, or distal end
of the vesicle. The proximal, or posterior end is generally tubular and may open
on the outer surface of the head; or it may merge with the palial folds and open
into the forebrain vesicle. The parietal eye usually persists through life, and it
may be the largest and most important one functionally.

The frontal eyes or stemmata of insects consist of two pairs or placodes

125

126 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

that form a median, tri-oculate group. They arise during the metamorphosis, or
at any rate after the embryonic period, and are quite independent of the primitive
ocelli. They are never involved in a palial fold or in a common vesicle, and
the retinal cells are, apparently, always upright. They are functional eyes only
in adult insects, or in the late larval stages.

In the arachnids and crustacea (phyllopods, entomostraca), the frontal ocelli
are present in a highly modified form, as two sets of frontal organs two paired and
one unpaired. In Limulus, they become the olfactory organs. In spiders and
scorpions, they are apparently absent. Their nerve roots arise from the median
anterior surface of the forebrain, or from the anterior surface of the optic ganglia
and hemispheres (Limulus).

The lateral or compound eyes are found in adult insects, crustacea, and
arachnids, including the trilobites and merostomes. Like the stemmata, their
relation to the primary head segments cannot be easily determined, because at the
time the cephalic lobes are most clearly segmented, as in the embryonic stages of
Acilius and the scorpion, the lateral eyes are absent, and they do not appear, if at
all, till near the close of larval life. In Limulus they belong to the cheliceral
segment; in insects, they appear to belong to the antennal segment.

The development of the lateral eyes is essentially the same in all arthropods.
They are derived from large crescentic placodes lying near the posterior lateral
margin of the cephalic lobes close to the edge of the infolding for the optic gang-
lion; but they never lie inside the fold, and the visual cells are never inverted.
The entire visual layer is formed from a single layer of primitive ectoderm.

The placodes are frequently divided, or may be entirely separated, into
two distinct parts, which differ in their histological characters, and in function
(hymenoptera, neuroptera, coleoptera). One part may be especially developed
in males (ephemeride), or one may serve for vision under water, and the other for
vision in air. .

Cerebral Eyes of Vertebrates.

In vertebrates we recognize as belonging to the forebrain, the median or
parietal eyes, the lateral eyes, and the olfactory organs. At an early embryonic
period they lie on the outer margins of the open neural plate, in similar positions
to the ones they occupy in arthropods.

The Parietal Eye.—There are probably two pairs of ocellar placodes that
for a short time occupy this marginal position. Later, they are caught in the
palial overgrowth and carried on the inner limb of the closing neural crests to
the median line. There they form a group of one, or two, or three placodes lying
in the membranous roof of the brain. During or after the closing of the cerebral
vesicle, the brain roof is evaginated at the place where the ocelli are located, thus
forming a sac or tube in the blind end of which the ocellar placodes lie.

The extraordinary way in which the vertebrate parietal eye develops is,

CEREBRAL EYES OF VERTEBRATES. 127

therefore, essentially like that of the parietal eye in Limulus and the scorpion.
This fact, and many others to be brought out later, demonstrates that the parietal
eye of the crustacea and arachnids is a true cerebral eye in the vertebrate sense,
and is identical with the parietal eye of vertebrates.

The lateral eyes of vertebrates represent the compound or convex eyes of
arthropods that have been transferred to the interior of the cerebral vesicle. In
the arthropods the lateral eyes lie near the margin of the cephalic lobes, on the
outer edge of a deep ganglionic infolding. In vertebrates, they are first seen in a
very similar position on the lateral margin of the open medullary plate. Later
they are swept into the infolding brain, turning the retinas inside out. They then
grow out laterally on the end of membranous tubes, in much the same manner as
the median eyes. In arthropods, the lateral eyes usually have a crescentic, or
kidney-shaped outline; in vertebrates, this shape is retained, giving the retinas
their characteristic crescentic outline during the early stages. When the two
limbs of the crescent unite, a circular retina is produced, giving rise to the choroid
fissure and the centrally located optic nerve that, together with the inverted
rods and cones, have long been such inexplicable features of the lateral eyes in
vertebrates.

The olfactory organ in vertebrates arises from three placodes situated on the
anterior margin of the cephalic lobes. They are not drawn into the brain cham-
ber, but remain permanently in the surface ectoderm. They move forward
along the median line followed by two pairs of olfactory nerves, that in the lower
vertebrates may remain separate up to the adult stages. Its structure, develop-
ment, and innervation is therefore similar to that of the frontal organs of the
crustacea, and the olfactory organ of Limulus.

II. THE Eves as SEGMENTAL SENSE ORGANS.

The larval ocelli, lateral eyes, auditory organs, stemmata and olfactory or-
gans appear to be local modifications of a series of primitive sense organs belong-
ing to the procephalic and first six thoracic metameres.

In insects and arachnids, the larval ocelli of the procephalic lobes present a
clearly defined segmental arrangement. (Fig. 14.) In scorpion and Limulus,
in addition to these ocelli, there is a transient series of segmental sense organs in
the thorax, which appears to be a continuation of that in the forebrain. (Figs. 15,
16, 140-142.)

In Limulus, the first pair of the thoracic series are the lateral eye placodes, /.e.
The fourth pair, s.o*, are large, circular placodes, distinctly sensory in character,
that are retained through the first larval or trilobite stage, after which they dis-
appear. This organ is probably the forerunner of the auditory organ of verte-
brates for it has the same shape and general appearance as the auditory placode
in vertebrate embryos, and as nearly as may be determined, lies on the same
segment. The other placodes are less distinct and are visible for a very short
period only.

In scorpions, on the outer margins of each coxal joint (Figs. 15-16), there

128 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

are two transitory sense organs which appear to represent the thoracic series of
Limulus. They disappear before hatching, after contributing an important mass
of ganglion cells to the pedal nerves.

The series of procephalic and thoracic sense organs just described should not
be confused with the segmentally arranged gustatory organs, which belong to a
different system, and which are always located on the median side of the base of
the appendages.

After this preliminary survey, we may consider the several organs under dis-
cussion in more detail.

IJ. THe Oce wi oF INsEcts.

A very primitive and suggestive condition is seen in Acilius, where the early
history of the ocelli is best known. Here the cephalic lobes are clearly divided
into three segments, each one containing a segment of the brain, one of the optic
ganglion, and one of the optic plate. (Fig. 14.) Three deep infoldings, iv, *~*,

Fic. 90,—The ocellus of an insect larva, Acilius (eye V). This ocellus looks forward and outward.

form on the median side of the plate, carrying the three-lobed optic ganglion be-
low the surface. The openings soon close, without the formation of a palial fold
like that which covers the whole forebrain in the scorpion.

The ocelli are formed by separate, pit-like infoldings of the optic plates, the
retina forming from the bottom of the pits and the dioptric apparatus from the
lips of the closed vesicles. (Figs. go-g1 and 102.)

At the close of larval life, the ocelli break away from the surface ectoderm

PARIETAL EYE OF THE SCORPION. 129

and become lodged deep in the head, on the surface of the optic ganglia, where
they degenerate.

The frontal ocelli are new formations, usually appearing at the beginning of
the metamorphosis, and differing from the larval ocelli in their mode of develop-
ment, time of appearance, and relation to the brain.

IV. Tue PARIeETAL Eye.

Parietal Eye of the Scorpion.

The development of the parietal eye in the scorpion and spiders furnishes
the best picture of the process by which ocelli are carried into the brain
chamber to form a true parietal eye like that in
vertebrates.

The evolution of the brain chamber and
the parietal eye is essentially the same in scor-
pions and spiders. (Figs. 15, 20, 21.) I will
describe the condition in the former.

The cephalic lobes soon divide into three
segments that have a very constant and charac-
teristic form in the arachnids. (Fig. 15.) One
may distinguish the centrally located brain neu-
romeres, br.*%, two prominent optic ganglia, and
a marginal plate, with deep infoldings between it
and the ganglia.

The whole of the first segment forms a dark
infolded band, extending across the anterior
margin of the cephalic lobes. From it is formed
the olfactory lobes (organ stratifié of St. Remy).

The lateral lobe of the second segment forms ane
the optic ganglion of the median eyes, p.e.g., Fic. 91.—The ocellus of an insect larva,
and the one behind forms the ganglion of the Sc¥ius (eve. This eve looks directly
lateral eyes, /.e.g.

Between the two ganglia and the lateral margin of the cephalic lobes are two
infoldings, the floor of which is formed by the lateral portions of the optic gan-
glia, iv?-iv?.

The median ocelli will develop from the extreme lateral margins of the
cephalic lobes, opposite the second pair of infoldings, and the lateral ocelli oppo-
site the third pair. The ocelli, however, are not visible till later.

The arachnid cephalic lobes are clearly comparable with those of Acilius, the
principal differences lying in the union of the parts of the first segment to form the
olfactory lobe, and the small size and late appearance of the ocellar placodes.

9

I30 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

Another important difference lies in the method of closing the ganglionic
infoldings, which is as follows: in the scorpion, the openings to the two pairs of
marginal infoldings lengthen till they merge with each other and with the one in
the olfactory lobes. A continuous groove, varying in depth, is thus formed
around the sides and anterior margin of the cephalic lobes. The edge of the
optic plates projects over the groove forming a thin-walled fold, which repre-
sents the beginning of the palial fold, its free margin being the neural crest.

The margin of the palial fold now advances inward and backward over the
outer surface of the forebrain. At the same time the olfactory lobes sink below
the surface, and slide backward, underneath the second segment, leaving only
a small, median part visible from above.

As the palial fold advances, the optic plate is rolled inward, transferring the
median eye placodes from the outer limb of the fold to the inner. When the
placodes have been carried about half-way across the surface of the brain, pig-
ment develops in them that may be seen, in surface views, through the overlying
ectoderm. (Fig. 16, A.) As the edge of the palial fold moves still farther back-
ward, the outline of the two eye sacs becomes distinctly visible. (Fig. 16, B.)

Finally both sacs merge into a single bi-lobed sac, with a narrow neck, or
epiphysis, that opens to the exterior through a small pore, which we shall call
the anterior neuropore. (Fig. 18, a.7.p.)

The neck to the eye sac elongates somewhat, its walls thicken and become
lined with chiten. It is still open in young scorpions, and remnants of it may
persist through life. (Fig. 43, e.t.)

The posterior edge of the completed palial fold extends straight across the
posterior boundaries of the forebrain. (Fig. 18.) When the latter is bent back-
ward onto the hemal surface of the egg, the edge of the fold forms the anterior
edge of the cephalo-thoracic shield. (Figs. 17, 43.)

By the time the eye tube and palial fold are completed, the anterior portion
of the palium, that is the part overlying the hemispheres, and the part originally
connected with the anterior wall of the inferior lobes, has thinned out and is no
longer recognizable. The position it would have, if retained up to that period,
is indicated in Fig. 43, pl.

It is clear that the anterior neuropore in the scorpion represents the point
over the forebrain toward which the palial folds converge and finally unite. The
pore leads, not only into the proximal end of the eye stalk, but also into the fore-
brain vesicle and into the olfactory lobes. Furthermore, it is clear that there
is no real difference between this method of forming a parietal, or cerebral eye,
and that in vertebrates. In the latter animals, the eye tube usually appears at a
relatively later stage, as an outgrowth of the completed palium or roof of the brain,
near the place where the anterior neuropore closed. In arthropods, the same
final condition is shown, and in addition, all the preliminary steps by which the
eyes were transferred from their original position to the brain roof.

The lateral ocelli lie for a considerable period on the external surface of the

THE PARIETAL EYE OF LIMULUS. 131

procephalic lobes, close to the margin of the palial fold, but, unlike the median
ocelli, they are not swept into the infolding, and hence onto the brain roof. They
develop into typical external eye-pits, which permanently remain in their original
position as regards the procephalic lobes. But in the adult, after the forebrain
has been folded back onto the hemal surface, they lie on the anterior lateral
margins of the cephalo-thoracic shield, on the hemal surface of the body, instead
of the neural. (Fig. 17.)

The Parietal Eye of Limulus.

In Limulus, the cephalic lobes, at first sight, bear no resemblance to those of
the scorpion, or of Acilius, but a more careful examination will show that the
essential features are the same in all of them.

We,

AN

Fic. 92.—A, Ocellus of Lycosa (middle one of the three lateral ocelli); B, retinal portion of the same, more
highly magnified, showing the retinal cells, each with a large outer nucleus, , and a smaller inner one, n'; the
lateral rods, rd, are in parallel rows, fenced off by vertical walls of dense pigment; concave reflecting membranes
underlie each double row of rods.

Development.—The cephalic lobes at first form two wing-like expansions of
the neural plate, with the stomodeum on the extreme anterior margin and the
cheliceree on the posterior one. (Fig. 140.) No division into segments is visible
at this stage.

A little later (Fig. 141), one may recognize the various parts that belong to
these segments, viz., two large infoldings in the olfactory lobes representing the
first segment, o/.l.; two pairs of minute pores representing the marginal infoldings
for the median ocelli on the second segment, p.¢.; a large olfactory placode on the

132 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

anterior edge of the lateral eye ganglion, representing the sense organ of the
third segment, ol. 0.; and the compound eye placode itself, about opposite the
chelicere, and belonging to the fourth segment, /.e.

The compound eyes arise just behind the true cephalic lobes; apparently they
are not represented in the scorpion or in spiders, or in the embryonic cephalic
lobes of those insects that undergo a metamorphosis.

During the following stages, the two pairs of ocellar tubes unite in the median
line in front of the olfactory lobes, forming a single median tube or epiphysis,
directed forward, below the skin. (Fig. 142, e.p.) Its distal end is dilated and
contains, as shown by its structure in the later stages, four ocellar placodes, two
paired and two practically unpaired ones; its posterior end opens on the surface
of the head by an oval pore situated just in front of the hemispheres, an. p.

Meantime the two paired olfactory placodes move mesially and a new un-
paired olfactory placode appears just in front of the pore of the eye tube. The
compound eyes migrate in the opposite direction, toward the posterior hemo-
lateral surface of the thorax.

We may harmonize these conditions with those in Acilius by assuming
that the two pairs of ocelli of the second segment are the only larval ocelli of the
acilius type retained in Limulus; and that the three olfactory placodes and the
compound eyes represent respectively the three stemmata and the compound
eyes of insects, which do not appear there till the close of the larval life. In
other words, in Limulus the secondary, or imaginal, set of eyes, and the primary,
or larval set, appear at the same period, the more recent organs being reflected
back into the same embryonic period as the more ancient ones.

While these events are taking place, the palial fold is forming in separate
sections, one being directed backward and inward over each lateral eye ganglion
op.g.; another over each infolding for the olfactory lobes, o/./, and a third over the
ocellar plates, an.p.

The margins of all three folds gradually move toward the anterior margin of
the hemispheres where they unite to form a common opening, the anierior neuro-
pore. This pore appears to be merely the opening to the united ocellar tubes,
but in reality it represents more than that. It is obviously comparable with the
anterior neuropore of the scorpion, differing from it only in that it les farther
forward. In both cases, the main opening represents the point toward which all
the epithelial overgrowths of the forebrain converge and the last point to be
covered by them. ‘This interpretation is no doubt the correct one, for it is clear
that the opening offers access, as it does in the scorpion, not only to the eye tubes,
but also to the cavities of the olfactory lobes, the spaces between the hemispheres
and the palial wall, and the spaces between the under surface of the hemispheres
and the floor of the forebrain. (Fig. 47, B.)

Change of Position.—The distal end of the ocellar tube is at first directed
horizontally forward toward the ectoderm that forms the anterior margin of
the procephalon. (Fig. 142.)

THE PARIETAL EYE OF THE LIMULUS. 133

As the embryo develops, this layer of ectoderm extends forward, carrying
the ocelli with it and drawing out the ocellar sac into a long epithelial tube or
epiphysis. The procephalic ectoderm then forms a vertical wall covering the
median anterior surface of the egg; still later it is bent backward onto

Fic. 93.— Various forms of retinophore, isolated by maceration and showing the position and shape of the retinal
rods. Cross-sections of the rods are shown over each figure, the place where the section is taken being indicated by
the letter S. 1. Upright terminal rod from ocellus V of Acilius; 2, horizontal terminal rod from sides of ocellus IT of
Acilius; 3, a giant retinal cell with short horizontal rod, from ocellus J7; 4, retinal cell, with lateral rod from com-
pound eye of Limulus; s, retinula cell from the compound eye of Tabanus; 6, retinal cell from the ocellus of Lycosa;
7, retinula cell, with serrated rod, from the compound eye of Pinus; 8, inverted retinal cell from the eye of Pecten;
9, rod cell from retina of an amphibian (species of Diemyctylus), showing two nuclei, n’and n, and indications of
division of rod into two parts with either a canal or fiber running through a part of the rod; ro, cone cell from
same animal, showing double nature of the cell as well as of the cone. The body corresponding to the second
nucleus lies at n’

the hemal surface of the buckler, where it represents the exposed surface
of the anterior end of the primitive head, or procephalon; the posterior end
of the head, coincident with the forebrain, remaining on the neural surface.

(Figs. 152, 153, pc.c.)

134 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

While this is taking place the ends of the anterior liver lobes unite in front
of the cephalic lobes, thus apparently isolating that part of the head containing
the ocelli, from the neural portion containing the olfactory organs and cephalic
lobes. (Figs. 149, 151.)

At this stage, the surface contours of the forehead cannot be clearly dis-
tinguished. But during the early trilobite stages, after boiling in caustic potash,
a distinct suture is visible on the cephalo-thoracic shield, marking the boundaries
of the primitive procephalon. (Fig. 152, pr.c.)

This suture quickly disappears, and in all subsequent stages the only part
of the primitive fore-head visible on the hema] surface is a narrow patch bearing
the ocelli. (Fig. 155.)

Appearance of the Placodes—We may now confine our attention to the later
stages of the parietal eye.

After the trilobite stage, one pair of ocellar placodes form the lateral walls
of a terminal dilatation, that may be called the ecto-parietal eye. (Fig. ro2, D.)
Their cells become invested with black pigment and they take on the character of
typical visual cells. (Fig. 94, /.ec.p.e.)

The other pair form the walls of a second median dilatation that we shall
call the endo-parietal eye, en.p.e. It lies below the surface, and on the proximal
side of the ecto-parietal eye. Its cells are unlike the usual retinal cells in shape,
arrangement, and pigmentation; but they are provided, temporarily, with plate-
like visual rods or rhabdoms.

Nerves.—In young Limuli, three to four inches long, four nerve fascicles may
be seen at the distal end of the eye tube, one for each retina of the ecto-parietal
eye, and two for the unpaired endo-parietal eye. (Figs. 94, ror, A.)

In the middle section of the tube, the four nerves unite to form a common
layer of fibers outside the epithelial walls of the tube. Toward its proximal end,
the nerve fibers separate from the epithelial walls of the tube and again divide
into four fascicles, or two pairs of roots, the larger pair ending in two conical
ganglia on the hemal surface of the olfactory lobes, the smaller one in two smaller
ganglia situated a little farther back. (Fig. 51, ey.r', ey.r*.)

Thus the evidence afforded by the infoldings on the cephalic lobes, the struc-
ture of the terminal sac, of the eye tube and the four nerve roots, show that the
“unpaired eye” of Limulus is formed by the partial fusion of two separate pairs
of ocelli.

Structure of the Retinas.—From the earliest larval stages, the difference in
structure between the endo- and ecto-parietal eyes is very striking. The ecto-
parietal retinas contain, besides numerous indifferent cells, well defined ommatidia
consisting of from five to seven cells with the visual rods arranged in star-shaped
rhabdoms near their outer ends. (Fig. 94.) The visual cells contain a relatively
small amount of reddish-brown pigment, and little, or none, of the white pigment.
The endo-parietal eye, in young Limuli three to four inches long, is a thick-walled,
pear-shaped vesicle lying well below the surface and almost inaccessible to light.

THE PARIETAL EYE OF THE LIMULUS. 135

An unpaired tubercle, or a more transparent spot in the chiten, usually marks
its location from the exterior. (Fig. 201.)

The thick inner wall of the vesicle, en.p.e., now consists of irregular elongated |
cells with small nuclei. The cells may show an obscure arrangement into large
groups, and are completely filled with minute granules, which are snow-white
by reflected, and greenish-black by transmitted light.

The outer wall consists of a few prominent sensory cells, whose pointed
outer ends terminate in nerve fibers. They are devoid of either white, or colored
pigment, or of visual rods, rt’.

’ This eye reaches the height of its development in the young animals from four
to six inches long, and from that stage on it appears to undergo a slow histological
degeneration, but without perceptible diminution in size.

Fic. 94.—The three chambered parietal eye vesicle of Limulus. A, from above; B, in cross-section; C, in long-
itudinal section. Semi-diagrammatic.

In the older animals, the distinction between the inner and outer walls dis-
appears, and the entire eye then consists of a solid mass of large vesicular cells,
with minute nuclei, crowded with ‘white pigment.”

After the early larval stages, all traces of the epithelial walls to the primitive
eye sacs have disappeared; the eyes appear to be separate organs, except in so
far as they are innervated by separate branches of a common nerve.

The development of the eyes has shown us that the epithelium of the eve
tube merely represents the tract of ectoderm that separated the ocellar placodes
from the brain, before they were enclosed in the brain chamber; along the inner
surface of this tract the nerve fibers passed from one to the other. When the pla-
codes were infolded, the connecting paths of ectoderm were infolded also, forming
the walls of the eye tube or epiphysis. When the fibers of the optic nerve grew
from the eye to the brain, or from the brain to the eye, they were compelled to

|

136 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE. |

follow the old paths, that is, the outer surface of the eye tube. When the nerve
fibers separate from it, the tube is left as functionless epithelium, which may, ia
whole or in part, disappear.

The dilated proximal end of the eye tube, from which the nerve roots have
separated, remains for a long time (up to three to four inches long), adhering to
the anterior surface of the hemispheres, beneath the thick neurilemma sheath.
In the adult all traces of it have disappeared. The distal end of the tube like-
wise disappears, so that finally the three ocelli are united to the brain by a single
solid nerve with four terminal branches and two pairs of roots, each of the four
roots ending in a distinct ganglion.

* * * * * * * ok *

The parietal eye of Limulus differs from that of the scorpion in the great
length of the eye tube, in the presence of the endo-parietal eye, and in the location
of the ganglia on the hemal surface of the brain, instead of the neural. These
differences, although sufficiently striking, are not fundamental, but due merely
to differences in the relative rate of growth of the adjacent organs in the two
animals. One cause of the difference was the closing of the anterior neuropore
in front of the hemispheres in Limulus, and behind them, in the scorpion. More-
over, as the parietal eye in the scorpion lies (morphologically) behind the hemis-
pheres, and over the neural surface, the ocellar ganglia are drawn upward,
toward the median neural side, as near to the eye as possible. In Limulus, the
parietal eye has migrated forward, and then backward on the hemal surface,
drawing the nerves and ganglia forward and hemally. (Fig. 47, 4 and B.)

The Parietal Eye of Branchipus.

The early stages in the development of the median ocellus of phyllopods
and other crustacea are imperfectly known. But its structure in the adult in-
dicates very clearly that it is the same kind of an eye as the median one in Limulus
and other arachnids, and probably develops in a similar manner. That is, it
consists of two pairs of ocelli enclosed in a median sac that opens to the exterior
for a time at least by a short, median duct, or epiphysis. (Fig. 102, A.)

The parietal eye of Branchipus is probably typical of many crustacea.
Its characteristic features appear in the nauplius at a very early period. In
Branchipus it is a tri-lobed vesicle consisting of two communicating sacs.
(Figs. 95 and 96.) The larger, outer one, or ecto-parietal eye, has thick, lateral
walls representing two ocellar placodes or retinas. The distal ends of the retinal
cells are directed inward and are capped with minute lateral rods, or plates. The
cavity of the sac is coated with a layer of dense black pigment, apparently the
product of two large cells whose nuclei are seen in the posterior lateral part, pg.c.

The inner sac, or endo-parietal eye en.p.e. is conical and with a minute cen-
tral canal or crevice toward which the inner ends of the retinal cells converge from

THE PARIETAL EYE OF BRANCHIPUS. 137

all sides. It is colorless, and doubtless represents one completely fused pair of
ocelli, corresponding with the inner, colorless eye sac of Limulus.

In sagittal sections, the pigmented floor of the outer sac, in younger specimens,
appears to be continuous with the outer ectoderm, leaving a narrow pore or crevice

Fic. 95.—Parietal eye vesicle of a young Branchipus, with the adjacent frontal organs (or lateral olfactory organs).
Composite frontal section. Camera outline.

by which the cavity of the eye sac communicates with the exterior. (Fig. 102, 4.)
This opening is doubtless comparable with the eye tube of scorpion and Limulus.
As the tube itself is very short the opening leads directly into the common eye
chamber containing the three ocellar placodes.

There is no lens for any part of the eye, light having free access to the shallow
retina of the outer sac from either side, and to the inner sac from all sides.

Fic. 96,—Sagittal section of the parietal eye of a young Branchipus. Camera outlines.
The ecto-parietal eye has two distinct nerves distributed over the outer
surface of the retinas, n.ec.e. ‘They arise from ganglionic enlargements of the

anterior median portion of the brain. The endo-parietal eye has a single nerve,
N.EN.€.

138 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

The Parietal Eye of Apus.

In Apus, the conditions are a little more complicated. Here, as in many other
phyllopods, there is a remarkable skin fold directed forward, forming a broad,
shallow chamber over both the compound eyes and the ocelli. (Fig. 102, B.) It
opens to the exterior by a narrow pore plugged with chiten. (Fig. 98, O.) This
opening should not be confused with the epiphyseal pore of scorpion and Limulus.
The parietal eye forms a closed chamber with a retinal placode on each side
wall, and two unpaired placodes, one on its posterior, the other on its inner wall.
(Figs. 97-99-)

Each placode consists of a single row of large, colorless, columnar cells.
Their distal ends are buried in a dense mass of dark brown, or black pigment;
their proximal ends are colorless.

m oat

Fic. 97.—Sagittal section of the parietal eye vesicle of an adult Apus. m, Fold covering the lateral eyes; O,
opening of the lateral eye vesicles, c.e.v; 0.at., remnants of canal leading into parietal eye vesicle; a.t.. cavity of
the same; p.rt., posterior retina; a.rt., anterior ratina.

As in Branchipus, there are two large cells which appear to give rise to the
greater part of the pigment that fills the cavity of the vesicle. (Fig. 98, p.g.c.)

When the pigment is partially dissolved, it is seen that each retinal cell is
capped with a large brush-like mass of fine fibers (retinidium), apparently the
free ends of nerve fibers passing through the interior of the cells, or over their
outer surfaces. They are comparable with the nervous network described by
me in the visual rods of Pecten, Acilius, Lycosa, etc., except that they are not reg-
ularly arranged, and are not imbedded in a dense, transparent matrix, which
usually forms the most conspicuous part of a visual rod.

The parietal eye sac of Apus probably contains the retinas of four distinct
ocelli, which during development migrated from the sides of the head toward
the median line. There they became enclosed in a common sac, that opened to

PARIETAL EYE OF APUS. 139

the exterior by a short duct or pore. The remnant of this duct is seen in the
adult in the deep recess on the posterior outer margin of the eye sac. (Fig. 97,
o. at., and 102, B.)

The fold of skin that covers both lateral and median eyes was no doubt a
later formation, having nothing to do with the original parietal eye infolding.

The parietal eye of Apus lies entirely below the surface. There are no over-
lying lenses, or thickenings of the adjacent ectoderm, to control the direction of
the light. The latter may enter the paired retinas from the sides, and the un-
paired ones from in front, or from behind.

Fic. 99.—Same as preceding figure, with
pigment removed, showing the coarsely
fibrillated visual rods, r.t.d., on the inner

Fic. 98.—Parietal eye vesicle of Apus, in cross-section. ends of the retinal cells.

There is no reason to doubt that the tri-oculate median eye of decapods,
copepods, trilobites, and merostomes, in structure and development is essentially
like that of Limulus, scorpions, spiders, Apus, and Branchipus. The evidence
presented clearly indicates that this group of ocelli is very constant throughout
the crustacea and arachnids, and that it has certain remarkable features which
distinguish it from all other visual organs. ‘There is no parallel to the way in
which these ocelli develop except in the parietal eye of vertebrates, and there is
no explanation available for the condition seen in vertebrates except the one offered
by the arachnids.

The Parietal Eye of Vertebrates.

The parietal eye of vertebrates was long ago demonstrated to be a vestigial
eye, although there are some authors who still refer to it as a mysterious organ of

140 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

unknown function. It is difficult to understand how any one familiar with visual
organs, could fail to recognize in the parietal eye of Petromyzon, or Hatteria, or
Lacerta, a visual organ of some kind. The pigment, lens, retinal cells, and nerves,
are unmistakably parts of an organ that served at one time as an eye, whatever
its function may be now.

The conflicting accounts of the parietal eye are due in part to the various
conditions in which it appears in different groups of vertebrates, but mainly
to a fundamental misconception of the ground plan of the organ and how it
happens to get inside the brain.

It has not been clearly recognized that the parietal eye is a paired organ
arising originally outside and beyond the boundaries of the brain; that it contains
several distinct sensory placodes; that there is a fundamental distinction between
the sensory placodes and the non-sensory epithelial tube that connects them with
the brain; and it has been very difficult to eliminate the idea that the paraphysis is
an eye or a part of one, or that it produces some part of the parietal eye.

From our new point of view, the parietal eye of vertebrates is a most signifi-
cant and illuminating organ. ‘The best insight into its meaning may be obtained
by studying its structure and development in the lamprey.

Petromyzon.—My observations on the development of the eyes of this
animal in the main, agree with those of Sterzi, especially in regard to the nature
of the early epyphysial outgrowth.

The Parietal Eye Vesicle—In larve about 6 mm. long, a single median
parietal eye tube is seen just in front of the superior commissure. The dilated
end of this tube appears to divide into two lobes, the larger one lying outside of,
and a little in front of the other. The inner one lies somewhat to the left of the
median line, the outer one to the right; the displacement, however, is not enough
to indicate that the two sacs are right and left lobes of a single pair.

I have no material representing the stages between 6 mm. and 30 mm.
larve, and I do not know just what takes place at this critical period, but the next
following stages seem to indicate clearly enough that, meantime, the inner sac has
become separated from the main tube, giving rise to an endo-parietal, or “ para-
pineal” eye; while the outer sac remains connected with the primitive eye tube,
giving rise tothe “pineal” or ecto-parietal eye. (Fig. 100, ec.p.e.and en.
p.e.) The floor of each sac is now divided by a deep longitudinal groove, consist-
ing of undifferentiated epithelium, into two symmetrically placed, concave discs,
each disc probably representing a retinal placode. (Fig. ror.) Both sacs develop
a small amount of brownish pigment, which is, however, masked by a large
quantity of the characteristic white granules. The entire organ, when seen with
the naked eye, is a glistening white spot that looks precisely like the endo-parietal
eye of Limulus. In both Limulus and Petromyzon, the granules are soluble in
weak acid.

The outer eye sac presents the most characteristic retinal structure. In
six inch ammoceetes, the retinas consist of a layer of sensory cells, each .bearing

PARIETAL EYE OF PETROMYZON. far

a long, fibrous, colorless rod suggestive of those seen in Apus. (Figs. 99 and 100.)
A layer of nuclei and fibers is seen below the columnar cells. Its outer wall, in
its central portion, consists of similar cells and rods. They have been regarded
as forming an imperfect lens, but their histological structure indicates that they

Fic. 101.—Plan of the parietal eye vesicle with its nerves, ganglia, and epiphysis, seen from the neural surface.
A, Young Limulus; B, young lamprey.

represent the remnants of visual cells, although they are not so well developed as

those on the floor of the sac. The two sets of rods meet in the middle of the sac,

their distorted ends forming a distinct cleavage band. On the periphery of the

eye the walls consist of a single layer of short, columnar cells.

iq2 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

The amount of pigment, and its distribution, varies greatly in different
individuals and at different stages. In many cases, the cells of the outer walls
are colorless, and the inner wall, and especially the two layers of rods, are densely
crowded with pigment, a condition similar to that seen in Apus and Branchipus.

The inner sac en.p.e. resembles the outer one, except that its retinal cells are
less highly specialized, and its outer wall consists of a thin layer of indifferent,
columnar cells.

The groove on the floor of the outer sac is hardly recognizable anteriorly,
but it gradually deepens toward the posterior margin, where it leads into the en-
larged, distal end of the epithelial eye tube or epiphysis. This part of the tube
persists in the adult as the conical “atrium” of Studniaka. The proximal part
of the tube likewise persists as a small solid cord, extending over the outer surface
of the ganglion habenula. A trace of its original opening may be seen as a conical
recess, in front of the superior commissure. (Figs. 100 and ior, 141.)

A similar groove, leading into a short blind tube, is seen in the floor of the
inner sac, ef”. This tube leads toward the base of the “atrium,” but at this stage
does not unite with it. It undoubtedly represents the remnants of the connection,
existing during the early stages, between the inner sac and the main eye tube.

After the metamorphosis the parietal eye loses the clear cut histological
details seen in the early stages, and is then undoubtedly of less importance
functionally.

The Parietal Eye Ganglia, or Ganglia Habenule, consist of a main right and
left ganglion, each consisting of an anterior and a posterior lobe. We may there-
fore, recognize four lobes, or two pairs of ganglia, for the parietal eye, a condition
in complete harmony with the presence of two pairs of retinal placodes in
the eye.

The left ganglion is smaller than the right and differs from it in minor,
histological details. It gradually moves forward and mesially, till the anterior lobe
lies close to the posterior, inner wall of the inner sac, with which it is connected
by a large bundle of nerve fibers. This nerve divides into two, one passing on
either side of the median groove. (Fig. 100, n”.)

The larger, outer eye is said to be connected by nerve fibers with the larger,
or right ganglion. I have not been able to satisfy myself that this was the case.
In fact the nerves to the outer sac are small and very difficult either to identify,
or to follow to their terminals.

The right and left ganglia are connected by at least two commissures that
originate in two large cores of neuropile. (Fig. 101.) From the latter, two
pairs of nerve tracts arise, the anterior pair, a./r., passing downward and forward
to the median face of the olfactory lobes; the posterior pair, p.tr., downward and
backward to the floor of the midbrain.

It is a surprising fact that the two anterior bundles are of approximately
equal dimensions, while of the posterior pair, the right is very much larger than the
left.

PARIETAL EYE OF THE PETROMYZON. 143

The inner and outer sacs of Petromyzon and the two similar ones in teleosts
have been regarded as right and left mates of a single pair, on the ground that
they are, for a short time at least, somewhat asymmetrical in position, one being
a little to the left, the other to the right of the median line; furthermore, it is claimed
that in the lamprey the larger outer sac is innervated mainly from the right
ganglion habenule, and the inner one from the smaller, left ganglion habenule.

The evidence however, is, by no means conclusive. My own observations
lead me to the conclusion that the inner and outer parietal eyes are just what they
appear to be, namely, two unpaired organs of slightly unequal value, one of which
has been crowded away from the median line.

ec.pe.

Fic. 102.—Semi-diagrammatic, sagittal sections of the head, showing the relative position and character
of the parietal eye, the epiphysis, neuropore, etc.,in A, Branchipus; B, Apus; C, scorpion; D, Limulus; E, vertebrate.
On the right the eyes are shown on a larger scale.

Evidence for this conclusion is afforded by the parietal eye of the cyclostomes
and less directly by the parietal eye of arachnids.

1. In the first place, in the lampreys, during the earliest stages, one sac
lies directly behind the other, and there is nothing to indicate that one is the right
or left mate of the other. Whatever asymmetry appears in the eye sacs is seen
later, and is comparatively slight. The same condition appears to prevail in
teleosts, according to Hill’s observations, although he interprets them differently.

Tid LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

2. The two parietal eye sacs in the cyclostomes not only stand very nearly,
in the median plane, but each sac contains a right sensory placode, or retina,
separated from a left one by a median groove, or by an unspecialized band of
tissue. Thus there are two symmetrical retinal placodes in each parietal eye.

3. In young lampreys about two inches long, each ganglion habenula is
divided into a smaller anterior lobe, united by two nerves with the inner sac,
and a larger posterior one, probably united in a similar manner with the outer
sac. Thus there are apparently four ganglia corresponding to the four placodes,
These facts are incompatible with the assumption that one sac is the right or
left mate to the other.

4. The asymmetry of the ganglia is pronounced. The left anterior lobe
ultimately takes up a central position below the inner sac, and remains com-
paratively small. The other three lobes become very large, especially the two
on the right; but the reason for this unequal development is not apparent, since
the nervous connection with the right sac is insignificant.

5. A comparison with the parietal eye of arachnids (Fig. 101), shows that
the inner sac of petromyzon (parapineal eye) corresponds to the endo-parietal
eye of Limulus, both sacs agreeing in position, in their lower grade of histological
structure, in their innervation, and in their relation to the epiphysis. The outer
sac of the lamprey corresponds with the outer one of Limulus, both sacs agreeing
in relative position, in being symmetrically bi-lobed, and in the presence of the
more highly specialized visual cells and rods.

The Lenses of the Parietal Eye.

It will be recalled that in the simple isolated ocelli of insects, the chitenous
lens and the thick transparent ectoderm that serves as a vitreous body are parts
of the optic cup, or of the lips of the cup. (Figs. go, gr.)

When there are well defined lenses to the parietal eye, as in many arachnids,
they are formed from isolated thickenings of the ectoderm and of the overlying
chiten, wherever the distal end of the eye tube reaches the surface of the head,
however remote that point may be from the one where the retinal placodes first
appeared.

In the scorpions, the parietal eye has a highly developed vitreous body and
two lenses. (Fig. 105.)

In Limulus, there are two well developed lenses, one for each retina of the
outer sac (Fig. 94). But the inner sac never has over it a true chitenous lens, or
any ectodermic thickening which may represent the remnants of a vitreous body,
although there may be a tubercle like thickening of the chiten, or a semi-transpar-
ent spot. (Fig. 201.)

In the phyllopods, although the parietal eye is often very highly developed,
it lies well below the surface, and there is no thickening whatever of the adjacent
ectoderm, or of the chiten, to form a lens or vitreous body for them. The fre-

LENSE OF THE PARIETAL EYE. 145

Fic. 103.—Cross-sections of the procephalic lobes of an embryo scorpion. E, Posterior part of stomodzal region,
showing the third cephalic neuromere, cn*, the lateral eye ganglion, l.e.g., and the corresponding invagination, and
the posterior margin or the palial fold; E’, same stage farther forward, showing the stomodeal ganglion and its
commissure, the second cerebral neuromere, the parietal eye ganglion and its corresponding infolding, iv?. Com-
pare Fig. 15, B. F and F’ are corresponding sections in an older stage, Fig. 16, A, showing the crowding of the

lateral eye ganglion over the cerebral neuromeres and the appearance of the parietal eye, p.a.c., on the inner
limb of the palial fold. Camera outlines.

Fic. 104.—Selected sections from a continuous series through the procephalic lobes of an embryo scorpion, in stag

G (Fig. 16, B). Camera outlines.
Io

146 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

quent absence of a lens and vitreous body, in the otherwise well developed parietal
eye of arthropods, is remarkable, since it does not occur in the other types of
arthropod ocelli. The fact is all the more significant when we recall that in
vertebrates true lenses to the parietal eye are never present. In place of them, we
find a transparent spot, or tubercle, or a thin place in the overlying tissues. The
thickening of the outer wall of the eye vesicle, which may possibly serve,.in ex-
ceptional cases, as a lens (reptiles), is probably the remnant of a retinal placode.
Location of the Placodes.—The location of the retinal placodes in the
parietal eye vesicle varies greatly. In the arthropods, they may lie in the side
walls (Branchipus), or in the outer wall (scorpion and Limulus), or in the inner
wall or floor, asin Apus. The prevailing position in arachnids is in the outer wall,

Fic. 105.—A, Section through the posterior margin of the parietal eye in stage H, showing the approaching
union of the two retinas, and the palial folds; B, section through the parietal eye of a newly born scorpion, showing
the parietal eye vesicles, and the ventricle, V, formed by the optic ganglia, the palial folds, and the forebrain
neuromeres. The ventricle extends forward and downward, into the cavity of the olfactory lobes, ol.v.

thus inverting the cells, and turning the rod bearing end toward the cavity of
the vesicle. But the retinal cells have a remarkable method of readjustment,
so that in the later stages, they appear to be standing in an upright position.

In vertebrates, the placodes in general appear to occupy the floor of the
vesicle, but they may develop on both walls, as in Petromyzon.

Minute Structure.—In the arthropods, there is nothing constant in the
histological structure of the parietal eye retinas. The principal elements are
columnar, sensory cells arranged either in a continuous layer, with terminal
rods projecting into the eye chamber (Apus, Branchipus), or they may be
arranged in definite groups, or ommatidia, consisting of from two to five or
more cells with plate-like rods attached to the side walls of each cell (Limulus,
scorpion, Phalangium, Lycosa).

Where the eye, to all appearances, has become functionless, /.e.. endo-parietal
eye of adult Limulus, the cells form a confused mass, without any definite arrange-
ment in layers, or in respect to the source of whatever light may reach them.
The black pigment is then absent and the cells are filled with a dense mass of
glistening white granules. Even in this degenerate condition, the visual rods
may be retained as irregular plates, singly or in groups, attached to the side walls
of the retinal cells.

PARIETAL EYE. 147

In the scorpion and other arachnids (Limulus, Galeodes and Phalangium)
a transformation takes place in the arrangement of the retinal cells, shortly after
the eye assumes its definite form. In the scorpion, owing to the method of in-
folding, the retinal cells are inverted, the nerves being distributed over the outer
surface of the sac, and the rods turned. toward the lumen of the vesicle. Later,
however, the nerves, entering from the side, appear to penetrate the retina about
midway between the inner and outer surfaces. In the adult, the rods are located
on the sides of the cells, near their outer ends, and the nerves then enter the oppo-
site, or inner end. Just how this apparent, or actual, reversal of the retinal
cells takes place, I have not been able to determine.

In the scorpion, Limulus and Phalangium, the rods lie in isolated groups, on
the sides of the cells, just below the outer surface of the retina. But in the parietal
eye of Galeodes and of spiders, where the same method of development prevails,
the rods form in the adult a continuous layer outside the retinal cells, and there
is no indication as to what was the nature of the of the post-embryonic trans-
formation that brought the rods and nerve ends into that position.

I. Summary.

We may summarize our conclusions in regard to the parietal eye as follows:

1. Allvertebrates possess remnants, more or less distinct, of a median or parie-
tal eye which in some forms contains true retinal cells and visual rods, and is
connected by several (4?) distinct nerves with as many ganglia.

2. There is but one median or parietal eye consisting, however, of several
parts.

3. The eye proper consists of three or four sensory placodes, each one
representing the retina of a simple ocellus of the arthropod type. The placodes
form the walls of a sac on the end of a membranous tube projecting from the
roof of the tween-brain.

4. The placodes have a paired arrangement and probably represent two pairs
of ocelli, located originally in the ectoderm, just outside the lateral margins of
the open medullary plate.

5. They were ultimately forced into, or carried into, the brain chamber by the
same forces that produced the brain infolding. ‘The placodes are carried on the
crest of the brain infolding toward the median line, meantime shifting from the
outer, to the inner, limb of the fold. When the crests unite, the four placodes
form a compact group on the membranous roof of the brain. At that point a
tubular outgrowth of varying length is formed which hasa vesicle or dilatation at
its distal end, in the walls of which the placodes lie. This vesicle with its four
placodes is the parietal eye.

6. The primary vesicle may now be constricted, forming two unpaired lobes,
or the lobes may separate, forming two separate sacs, a larger, anterior and outer
one, the ecto-parietal eye, containing the two most highly developed placodes,

148 LARVAL OCELLI AND THE PARIETAL EYE.

and an inner posterior one, or endo-parietal eye, containing the remaining two
placodes, now completely united into one organ, and with greatly reduced struc-
tural details.

7. The membranous tube, or epiphysis may disappear in whole or in part,
leaving the terminal eye sacs either isolated, or united by distinct nerves with the
parietal eye ganglia, or the ganglia habenule.

8. The parietal eye of vertebrates is homologous with the parietal eye of such
arthropods as Limulus, scorpion, spiders, phyllopods, copepods, trilobites, and
merostomes, but not with the frontal stemmata or other ocelli of insects.

g. In the arthropods, various stages in the evolution of a cerebral eye are
shown in detail, from functional eyes on the outer margin of the cephalic lobes,
to a median group of ocelli enclosed within a tubular outgrowth of the brain roof.

The most primitive type of a parietal eye is seen in the nauplii of phyllopods
and entomostraca, where the eye is a pear-shaped sac, opening by a median pore
or tube on the outer surface of the head. (Fig. 272, 308.) In the higher arachnids,
the process of forming an embryonic eye vesicle merged with the process of form-
ing a cerebral vesicle, the external opening of the forebrain vesicle and that of the
parietal eye tube, forming a common opening or anterior neuropore.

to. The parietal eye of arthropods is an important visual organ until the
lateral eyes, which represent a later product, are fully developed. It may then
diminish in size and activity, but it rarely, if ever, wholly disappears.

11. During the evolution of vertebrates from arachnids, there was a consider-
able period during which the lateral eyes were adjusting themselves to their new
position inside the brain chamber, and when they were in functional abeyance.
At this period, ancestral vertebrates were mon-oculate, that is they were dependent
solely on the parietal eye, which had come to them from their arachnid ancestors
as an efficient and completely formed organ.

When the lateral eyes again became functional, the parietal eye began to
decrease in size and effectiveness.

The parietal eye is the only one now present in tunicates. In the oldest
ostracoderms, like Pteraspis, Cyathaspis, Palaspis, the lateral eyes are absent, or
at least do not reach the surface of the head, the only functional one being the
parietal eye, which is of unusual size.

In the lampreys we see the same conditions, the parietal eye being very well
developed in the larve, while the lateral eyes are deeply buried in the tissues of
the head, and useless. During the transformation, the lateral eyes again become
functional, and the parietal begins to atrophy, finally losing many of its structural
details and its function, although still retaining very nearly its original form.

CHAPTER IN.

THE COMPOUND EYES OF ARTHROPODS AND THE LATERAL
EYES OF VERTEBRATES.

Froriep (Hertwig’s Handbook of Embryology) states, quoting Kessler, 1877,
that K. E. von Baer’s discovery that the eye in the chick is a hollow outgrowth of
the forebrain vesicle, is the most interesting fact in the development of the eye
that could have been obtained, and is without a parallel. He also quotes with
approval Gegenbaur’s expression of astonishment that in the entire range of
vertebrates there are no lower stages in the development of such a complex organ
as the eye. The vertebrate eye, he says, Athene-like, makes its appearance com-
pletely formed, and comparative anatomy and embryology are powerless against it.

The problem, however, is not as hopeless as this, for we have shown that the
parietal eye of arachnids furnishes a very striking parallel to the development of a
vertebrate cerebral eye. The arachnid theory also provides a satisfactory ex-
planation for the sudden appearance of lateral, cerebral eyes in vertebrates, and for
their most striking peculiarities. It is clear, on the arachnid theory, that the lateral
eye was delivered to the vertebrates in a high stage of perfection. There are no
transitional stages between the external, convex eye of arthropods and the internal,
concave eye of vertebrates, because there can be no half-way stages between an
eye that stays outside the brain chamber, and one that during development is
carried into the chamber. The eye must either get in early, before the brain
closes, or stay out. Either position, at once and definitely, determines its char-
acter and the way it does its work. Whatever moulding influence the new en-
vironment had on the enclosed eye was felt immediately, and the necessary read-
justments, no doubt, at first followed rapidly and then ceased, leaving the eye
more stable than before, because enclosed in less variable surroundings.

* * * * * * * * *

I. Compounp Eyres or ARTHROPODS.

A. Serial Location.—The lateral eyes of arthropods are such essential and
constant parts of the head that it is important to determine their origin, and to
what metamere they belong. This, however, is a very difficult thing to do.

The view, often expressed, that the compound eyes are compact groups of
larval ocelli is untenable, since the primitive larval ocelli (coleoptera and lepi-
doptera) degenerate and take no part in the formation of the lateral eyes. More
over, in the very early larval stages of phyllopods, copepods, and many other
crustacea the larval ocelli and compound eyes are present at the same time and
clearly arise independently of each other.

149

150 THE EYES OF ARTHROPODS.

In forms like Acilius, that give us a most detailed picture of ancestral con-
ditions, not a trace of the lateral eyes appears till late in the larval stages, when it is
impossible to certainly determine their relations to the cephalic lobes, or to other
segmental structures. They are first seen on the hemal side of the head of the
oldest larve, median to the ocelli. The latter, during the metamorphosis, are
torn away from the ectoderm, apparently by the relative shortening of the optic
nerves, and are finally lodged on the surface of the optic ganglion, where they may
be seen in a degenerate condition, long after the lateral eyes have become func-
tional. In the early embryonic stages of insects that do not pass through a
metamorphosis, and in many crustacea, the lateral eyes are seen on the posterior,
lateral margins of the cephalic lobes, just lateral to an infolding that gives rise to
the optic ganglion. Here also their relation to the metameres has not been
determined.

Limulus is the only form in which the larval ocelli, frontal ocelli (olfactory
organs), and the lateral eyes, are all present at the same time in an early embryonic
stage. Here it is clear that the lateral eyes arise from the cheliceral or first
thoracic segment. (Figs. 141 and 142.)

I see no serious objections to regarding the lateral eyes of insects as also
belonging to the first appendage bearing segment, and if the “organ of Tomés-
vary,’ in the myriapods represents the rudiment of the lateral eyes, as I have
suggested, 1892, then that also would have a similar position, since it is situated
at the base of the antenne, and its nerve is attached to the ganglion of the larval
ocelli in the same way the compound eye-nerve is in Acilius. (See optic ganglion
in Acilius.)

These facts indicate, therefore, that the lateral eyes of arthropods stand
serially behind both the primitive cephalic lobes and the larval ocelli, and belong
to the most anterior appendage-bearing segments of the primitive body or thorax.
I can find no evidence in the structure or development of the lateral eyes to indi-
cate that they are modified appendages.

B. Development.—Although the lateral eyes are often post-embryonic
structures, they may, in some forms, arise during the embryonic stages.

In such cases, Vespa, Astacus, Limulus and others, the lateral eye placodes
lie on the external margin of a deep infolding which gives rise to the optic ganglia,
in the same manner that the infolding in Acilius gives rise to the ganglia of the
larval ocelli. (Fig. 14.) The lateral eyes, however, are never involved in
this infolding. It soon closes, and the placodes move away from the margin of
the cephalic lobes onto the posterior hemal surface of the cephalothorax (Limulus,
many trilobites and merostomes), or in some cases, onto its anterior margin,
or they may remain in their original position on the neural surface, (Cladocera).
(Fig. 78.) The position of the lateral eyes in the adult, therefore, varies greatly,
and is either determined by the prevailing position of the animal in relation to
the source of light, or the location of the eyes determines the position of the
animal.

LATERAL EYES OF VERTEBRATES. I51

In Vespa, after the ganglionic infolding has closed, the lateral eye placodes
are themselves deeply infolded and partly covered by thin membranous folds,
but the latter soon disappear and take no part in the formation of the eye.*

In insects, crustacea, and Limulus, the eye proper, or ommateum, including the
cyrstalline cone cells and retinule, is formed from the single layer of columnar,
ectodermic cells that constitutes the lateral eye placode. The infolding described
by Reichenbach and others, in the crayfish, as forming the deeper layers of the
eye, is merely the infolding that produces the lateral eye ganglion.

II. LATERAL EVES OF VERTEBRATES.

In my first contribution to the origin of vertebrates, 1889, I pointed out the
remarkable resemblance between the early position of the eye placodes in verte-
brates and arthropods, and the similar way in which the neural crests enclose the
forebrain vesicle.

Many contributions have been made since that time, especially in regard
to the vertebrates, that confirm my observations and my interpretations of them,
yet no one appears to have clearly understood the facts or their significance.
It is hoped that a fuller description, with numerous additional figures, will make
these important data intelligible and convincing.

While the lateral eyes of arthropods are never caught in the infoldings of
the embryonic forebrain, as the larval ocelli are, they lie very close to the edge
of such folds, so that any marked deepening or extension of them, brought about
by the increasing size and precocity of the brain and its ganglia, would be likely
to include the lateral eye placodes in the infolding, and thus transfer them to the
inner walls of the brain chamber. In this new position, they would be subject
to entirely new conditions, and they would doubtless quickly undergo important
structural changes.

The structure and development of the vertebrate eye indicate that, in some
of the intermediate forms between vertebrates and arthropods, these events have
actually taken place.

Location.—It has long been known that the lateral eye placodes of verte-
brates are visible at a very early stage on the outer margin of the open medullary
plate, (selachians, amphibia, birds). (Figs. 34 and 35.)

As the neural crests advance toward the median line, the placodes are trans-
ferred to the inner limb of the fold, and finally come to lie in the walls of the
brain chamber, in precisely the same manner that the parietal eye placodes reach
a similar position.

Origin of the Choroid Fissure and the Blind Spot.—After they are thus
enclosed in the brain walls, they assume the shape and position which is so
characteristic of vertebrates, and which becomes so significant when compared
with the same features in the lateral eyes of arthropods.

1See the peculiar, hood-like fold over the lateral eyes of Apus and other phyllopods.

152 THE EYES OF ARTHROPODS.

It will be recalled that in arthropods the compound eye is rarely circular in
outline. It is usually crescentic or kidney-shaped, the convex margin being turned
toward the source of light. A characteristic condition is seen in forms like Limulus,
trilobites and merostomes, where the eyes are located on the sloping hemal
surface of the bucklers, the light coming from above, when the animal is in its
normal crawling position. Here the eyes take the form of convex crescents, or
some slight modification of them, because such a form distributes the maximum
number of ommatidia to best advantage in reference to the direction and the in-
tensity of light. For similar reasons of economy, the optic nerve reaches the eye
at its topographical center, that is, near the middle of its neural or concave margin,
and all the fibers are distributed from that point by the shortest paths to their
respective terminals. (Fig. 106, 4.)

Fic. 106..—Diagram to explain the origin of the choroid fissure in the lateral eye of vertebrates. A. The
extra cerebral, kidney-shaped compound eye of a marine arachnid; JB, the same eye, as is appears seen through
the walls of the head in vertebrate embryos. In its transfer to the wall of the cerebral vesicle, the eye is turned
upside down and inside out. The arms of the horseshoe-shaped retina then unite, forming a choroid fissure, while
the optic nerve, entering near the middle of the retina, distributes its fibers over what is now its outer surface.

If such a kidney-shaped eye, lying during the early stages near the margins
of the cephalic lobes, were actually involved in the brain folds, as the larval ocelli
are, it would still tend to retain the same shape and to occupy the same posi-
tion that it did while on the outer surface of the body, that is, the eye would
eventually grow out from the brain wall, on the end of a tube directed back-
ward toward the original position of the eye.

But the kidney-shaped eye, owing to its inversion during the infolding, would
now form a kidney-shaped retina, or sensory placode, with its convex surface
directed inward, instead of outward, and its concave margin directed hemally,
instead of neurally. (Compare Figs. 32 to 34 and 106.) In other words,
the inverted compound eye would have the same peculiar shape and position that
the vertebrate retina has at an early embryonic period. But in its new position
and under the new conditions prevailing within the head, the open crescentic
form of the placode would probably not be retained. It would be likely to
follow its original method of growth unchecked, till a new position of equilibrium
was attained; that is, it would continue to grow more rapidly on one margin than
on the other, till the two limbs of the crescent unite, forming a concave, circular
retina, with a “choroid fissure” directed hemally, and with a centrally located
nerve at the apex of the fissure, distributing its fibers radially over the concave
surface of the retina. (Figs. 107 and 108.)

LATERAL EYES OF VERTEBRATES. 153

The Retinal Cell Pattern.—In Limulus, and no doubt similar conditions
prevail in trilobites and merostomes, the lateral eyes consist of numerous chitenous
lenses, under each of which is an “‘ommatidium,” consisting of a circle of fifteen
or twenty rod bearing cells, surrounding a central one that appears to be more
highly specialized and to have a richer nerve supply than the others.

The ommatidia are separated from one another by circles of unspecialized
columnar epithelial cells. The crystalline cone cells and the corneagen cells of
other arthropods are absent.

When such a simple kind of facetted eye was enclosed in the brain walls
of vertebrates, not only was the primitive shape of the whole eye retained, but
the characteristic pattern in the arrangement of the two different kinds of cells
was also retained. That is, the circles of rod-bearing cells surrounding a single
central one, is probably represented in vertebrates by the circles of rod cells sur-
rounding a cone cell. (Fig. 106.)

The histological changes involved in this transformation are comparatively
small, the most important one being a transfer of the retinular rods from a lateral
to a terminal position. Such changes as this frequently occur in the arthropods.
Compare, for example, the striking differences in the structure of the retinal cells
in the parietal eye of Apus, Branchipus, Buthus, Galeodes, and Limulus.

The Retinal Ganglion.—In Limulus, there is a loose layer of ganglion cells
lying just beneath the inner surface of the lateral eye; and a similar one is present
in the eyes of many other arthropods, e.g., retinal ganglion of insects and crustacea.
When the lateral eye of vertebrates was involved in the palial fold, this layer went
with it, forming the nerve cells that lie outside the stratum of rod and cone cells.
(Figs. 107 and 108, r.g.)

* * 2k * * of * * *

The Lens.—A striking feature of the lateral eye is the development of a lens
vesicle from the surface ectoderm and its union with a retinal placode which grows
out from the brain walls to meet it.

The origin of the image forming organ at a remote time and place from that
of the sensory receptive surface, has led many writers to the conclusion that they
represent two originally different classes of organs, secondarily united into one.
Thus the lens vesicle has been interpreted as a specialized gill pocket, or as a
segmental sense organ serially homologous with those of the hindbrain region.
These views are untenable because they are not called for by the facts as we now
understand them. In Limulus and scorpion, we have shown that the cuticular
lens and the lentiginous ectoderm of the parietal eye are formed wherever the
vesicle reaches the surface ectoderm, no matter how remote that point may be
from the original position of the retinal placode. (Figs. 1o1 and 102.) It is
clear enough, in these cases, that the lens cups are an original part of the eye, and
cannot be thought of as existing apart from it. Precisely the same condition, it
seems to me, prevails in the lateral eye of vertebrates. We would therefore

eliminate the lens vesicle from the category of organs foreign to the eye. It may
be comparable with the thick-walled ectodermic cup that secretes the chitenous
lenses for the parietal eyes of arthropods. (Fig. 108.) When the chitenous
exoskeleton atrophied, the old lens cup probably remained to form the new lens
of the vertebrate eye.

Origin of the “Imperfections” in the Vertebrate Eye.—Thus the com-
pound eye of arachnids, which lies on the outer surface of the head, is represented
in vertebrates by the retinal placode which there lies in the walls of the brain
chamber. The vertebrate retinal placode still retains essentially the same con-
tour, surface curvature, and arrangement of visual cells and nerve cells as that of
its arachnid prototype, but owing to the inversion of the placode, which took place
when it was transferred to the brain chamber, the concave surface and the con-
cave margin of the retinal placode face in nearly opposite directions in vertebrates
from what they do in the arachnids.

Thus arose those extraordinary imperfections of the vertebrate eye, which
have so often excited the comments of the physicist, anatomist, and philosopher.
The inverted retina, the choroid fissure, and the blind spot caused by the awkward
entrance of the optic nerve, are the inevitable result of a combination of condi-
tions, some of which, originally, had no relation whatever to the eye. These con-
ditions were established in the arthropods long before the vertebrate stock ap-
peared, and it was a purely incidental, or accidental, result of these conditions that
the eye was swept into the brain chamber, where it did not originally belong. In
other words, the fate of the lateral eye was not decided by what was best for the
eye, as an instrument, or by any selective action, in which the eye itself played
apart. The eye was a purely passive victim of its location, and of its more power-
ful neighbor, the brain. But it survived, in spite of its unfortunate location, al-
though it will forever bear the marks of a displaced and made over organ.

Ill. Tue Optic GANGLIA.

In reconstructing the history of the vertebrate brain, the structure and posi-
tion of the optic ganglia of arthropods is no less significant than that of the eyes.

Location.—We have already shown that in the embryos of Acilius the optic
ganglia consist of three lobes lying on the lateral margins of the neural plate, each
lobe lying opposite a forebrain neuromere. (Fig. 14.)

When the larval ocelli of insects degenerate, the ocellar ganglia, without
noticeable transformation, become the ganglia of the lateral eyes. But in Limulus
and in the arachnids generally, the ganglia of the parietal eye and those of the
lateral eyes are separate. In most insects and crustacea, the ganglia retain their
lateral position through life. This is also the condition in young Limuli, but later
the great overlapping lobes of the hemispheres crowd the lateral eye ganglia to-
ward the hemal surface. (Figs. 36-39.) Limulus is the only arthropod, to my
knowledge, in which the ganglia occupy this position.

THE OPTIC GANGLIA. 155

In the phyllopods and arachnids, they are generally drawn upward, so that
they lie on, or over, the neural surface of the brain.

Sections and surface views of scorpion embryos show how this is done.
(Figs. 15, 16, 18, 41, 103, 104.) It will be seen that as the palial folds advance, the
optic ganglia move upward and inward till they lie on the neural surface of the
forebrain neuromeres, the parietal eye ganglion lying in front of the lateral eye
ganglion. In this position they give us the clue to the interpretation of the optic
centers in vertebrates for, clearly, one represents the ganglion habenula, the other
the tectum opticum, or the roof of the midbrain. (Figs. 43, 44.)

Parietal Eye Ganglia.—We have already shown that the two pairs of gan-
glia, from which the roots of the parietal eye nerves arise, are represented in
petromyzon by a four lobed ganglion habenula. (Fig. 104, B.) The latter
occupies the same relative position as in the scorpion, but a very different one from
that in Limulus. However, the difference is more apparent than real, because the
anterior roots of the ganglia habenule are directed downward and forward
toward the olfactory lobes, showing not only the direction in which the ganglia
have been shifted, but that their original point of union with the brain is the
same as it isin Limulus. (Compare Fig. 47, A, B, and C.)

The difference in position of the parietal eye ganglia, in scorpion and Limulus,
is due to the fact that in Limulus the eye is drawn forward and hemally by the
extraordinary size of the cephalic shield, and by the rapid growth of the hemi-
spheres, which have grown up behind the epiphysis, instead of in front of it as in
all other arthropods. (Compare Figs. 43, 44, 46, and 47.)

Lateral Eye Ganglia.—The characteristic shape of the optic ganglia is well
seen in large-eyed insects, as Vespa, where they consist of three principal lobes.
(Fig. 107, A.) 1. A proximal one, that is roughly spherical; 2. a median one,
consisting of an immense concave crescentic disc, and 3. a long narrow one,
extending around the distal margin of the middle lobe. Each lobe contains a
mass of felted fibers of the same general shape as the lobe, and is covered, on its
outer surface, by a thick layer of ganglion cells.

The hemispherical middle lobe is the most conspicuous one, and the one
which, by its contour and dimensions, reflects most accurately the variations in
the eye to which it belongs. This significant fact has also been observed in the
ocelli of Acilius, where each one of the six pairs of eyes has a special shape, or some
peculiarity in the arrangement of retinal cells, which is accurately repeated in the
size, form, and structure of the neuropile core of the corresponding ganglion.

Minute Structure in Limulus.—In Limulus, the ganglia have a similar con-
figuration to those of insects. (Figs. 37-39, 51,66.) Theinner lobes (Figs. 51 and 52)
contain large association neurites, op.g.* and op.g.*; the two outer ones, the central
ends of the optic nerve fibers, op.f., and two relays of optic neurones, op.g.* and
op.g.”

Each of the two outer lobes is a disc-shaped mass of fibers, one surface covered
with a thick layer of nerve cells, the other bare. In certain cases, successfully

impregnated with methylene blue, only the terminals of the optic nerves are stained.
They are then seen as small bundles passing in definite order through the gang-
lion, between the medullary core and the nerve cell layer. (Fig. 51.) Each
bundle of fibers, o.f., probably represents the terminals of a definite ommatidium.
On reaching the proximal edge of the lobe, two delicate fibers are given off, one
on each side, that penetrate the first core and end there in a few straggling
branches. (Fig. 51, A, op. f.) Just beyond them, a compact tuft of varicose
fibers is formed on the proximal outer surface of the core. The main fiber then
passes to the under surface of the second core, forming with other fibers a
characteristic chiasma, »., and then, bending upward, ends in widely distributed
dendrites.

Fics. 107-108.—Diagrams to illustrate the relation between the brain, optic ganglia and lateral eyes of an
arthropod and a vertebrate. In both cases the parts are projected onto the same transverse plane. Fic. 107.—
arthropod, Fic. r0o8.—vertebrate, where the same parts, by the infolding of the medullary plate, have been
transferred to the walls of the cerebral vesicles. The optic ganglia are inverted, forming the roof of the mid-
brain; the compound eye, with its visual cells and underlying ganglionic cells, r.J., forms the inverted retina.

Many other fibers, like the one just described, enter on the opposite side of
the first core and extend along its inner face, giving off the varicose dendrites; they
then pass to the outer face of the second, ending in the double set of dendrites
on its proximal margin. (Fig. 52.) In figure 51, these fibers are seen as dotted
strands running diagonally across the inner face of the first lobe, and appearing
as continuous strands on the outer surface of the second. On passing from one
lobe to the other, the two sets of fibers form the well known chiasma (Fig. 52,V.)
When seen from the surface, the whole effect is that of a single lobe that has been
twisted, through about one revolution, into two lobes.

The surface neurones of each lobe send their fibers into the other medullary
core. For example, the fiber from cell a (Fig. 52), extends along the outer surface
of the second core, parallel with the optic nerve fibers, to the under surface of the
first and then upward, ending in the central part of the distal margin of the core.
Neurones 6 take the reverse course. The remaining ones take intermediate
courses.

COMPARISON WITH VERTEBRATES. 157

The proximal lobe consists of two parts; an anterior one, composed of large
neurones, sending their main fibers into the olfactory lobes, and collaterals into
the second lobe of the optic ganglion. (Figs. 51 and 52, op.g.*); and a posterior
part consisting of a spherical mass of. somewhat smaller neurones, sending their
main fibers backward into the longitudinal tract of the brain (op. f.*), and their
collateral branches into the second lobe of the ganglion (op.g.*).

The optic ganglia are united with other parts of the brain by the following
tracts: a, a distinct bundle of fine fibers that passes without interruption through
the optic ganglion into the crura, and run the whole length of the brain (Figs. 51 and
66 op.ir.); 6. a tract uniting the ocellar ganglia with the second lobe of the lateral
eye ganglia (o0c.tr.); c. a commissural tract through the olfactory lobe, formed by
the neurones of the fourth lobe (op./.*);d. a longitudinal tract formed by the neu-
rones of the third optic lobe, and which extend backward the whole length of the
crura (op.f.*); e. and finally, an important tract, the source of whose fibers is
unknown extending from the second lobe of the optic ganglion into the cerebral
hemispheres (Fig. 52, op. tr. H.).

* * * * * * * * *

IV. COMPARISON WITH VERTEBRATES.

We have already shown that the four ganglia of the parietal eye in Limulus are
comparable with the four lobed ganglia habenule of the cyclostomes. There is
also a striking resemblance between the lateral eye ganglia of arachnids and the
optic lobes of vertebrates, especially when we make due allowance for certain
peculiarities of position and structure.

We may best explain the origin of the optic lobes of vertebrates on the
assumption that the optic ganglia of some form like Limulus have been bent
backward and upward onto the neural surface of the brain, in the manner shown
in Figs. 44, 57, 58, and 108. In this position, which is similar to the one
they occupy in the scorpion and other arachnids, they have the same general
form and the same relation to the rest of the brain that the optic lobes have in
vertebrates; the three lobes of the optic ganglia corresponding respectively to the
colliculus, the tectum, and the torus.

It will be observed that in this new position (Fig. 108, B), the general contour
of each of the ganglia is retained, but the general appearance of the whole series
is greatly disguised, owing to the change of curvature of the second and third
lobes, and to the diagonal movement of the ganglia in a caudad and neurad
direction. (Fig. 46.) Both the distal and proximal ends of the series are fixed at
the optic commissure, the original point of attachment of the ganglia to the basal
lobes of the forebrain. The convergence of the fiber tracts of the optic lobes
toward the optic chiasma shows that the optic lobes belong primarily to the hemi-
sphere neuromeres, and that their position in vertebrates is a secondary one.

it 1S Clear TNal, 4S TePaATaGs COUMpaCluless alld CCULVILYy YL Space, Wie Calyx
is an advantageous one.

The optic lobes of vertebrates have been forced into their present position
by the general trend of several growth forces which appear at an early embryonic
period in the arthropod head. We have already referred to some of these condi-
tions. Those that are most persistent and which most affect the position of
the optic ganglia are: 1. the overgrowth of the neural crests, which tend to carry the
ganglia from the margins of the medullary plate toward the median line; 2. the
central location of the eyes on the neural surface of the head in many free swimming
arthropods and in ostrocoderms; 3. the tendency of the entire brain to move forward
beneath the integument, while the rostrum and other superficial neural structures
move backward. (Compare Fig. 46.)

When the optic ganglia are once established in a median neural position be-
hind the hemispheres, the increasing size of the latter, and of the optic lobes
themselves, exaggerates still more the backward movement of the neural portion
of the ganglia and of the primitive cerebellar commissure.

Thus the roof and sides of the mesencephalon represent the ganglia of the
compound eyes of arthropods that have worked back into the territory behind
the hemispheres by that struggle for space between growing organs which ad-
justs and readjusts, till each part falls into the place of least resistance.

Whether the optic lobes helped in the closure of the old mouth, or the disap-
pearing mouth and rostrum made a place for the lobes, cannot be determined.
Doubtless these events are part of a general movement, where it becomes im-
possible to distinguish cause from effect.

Dr. L. Griggs, working at Dartmouth, has been able to locate the optic
lobes on the margins of the forebrain region, in the open neural plate stage of
Amblystoma, and has followed their course backward and upward till they
reach their permanent position. The movements of the lobes, as he describes
them, afford a striking confirmation of the interpretation given above.

Conclusion.

1. The lateral eyes are homologous throughout the insects, crustacea,
arachnids, and vertebrates.

2. In the arthropods they develop historically later than the larval ocelli, and
from a more posterior segment, namely the first appendage bearing segment
behind the primitive cephalic lobes.

3. In the arthropods the lateral eye placodes lie for a time on the lateral
margins of the cephalic lobes, close to the deep infoldings that form a part of the
brain. In vertebrates, the eyes at first have a similar position, but a precocious
enlargement of the cephalic lobes and the neural crests leads to the enclosure of
the compound eye placodes in the brain chamber, so that they appear to form
a part of the brain.

CONCLUSION. 159

4. The characteristic shape of the arthropod eye and the arrangement of its
retinal cells is retained in an exaggerated form in the vertebrate retina, and
affords us the only satisfactory explanation of its inversion, its contour and
mode of growth, its choroid fissure, its arrangement of rod and cone cells, and its
centrally located optic nerve.

5. The parietal eyes of vertebrates belong to the second forebrain neuromere,
the lateral eyes to the third or fourth.

6. The optic lobes of primitive vertebrates represent the compound eye
ganglia inverted and transferred to a position overlying the mesencephalic neuro-
meres. ‘Their genetic relations, as well as their most intimate functional and an-
atomical relations, are with the procephalic neuromeres.

7. The ganglia habenule of vertebrates represent the ganglia of the parietal
eyes of arachnids, united in the middle line over the region of the diencephalon.
They were primarily associated with the olfactory lobes.

CHAPTER NX.
THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

The agreement between the olfactory organ of Limulus and that of verte-
brates may be traced in respect to so many different characters that the existence
of a genetic relationship between the marine arachnids and the vertebrates is
placed beyond a reasonable doubt. Indeed there is a greater difference in
respect to this organ, between Limulus and other invertebrates than there is
between Limulus and vertebrates.

The olfactory organ of Limulus, in certain respects, stands in a class by
itself. Nevertheless it represents a modification of organs very widely distributed
in the arthropods, and known in insects as the frontal ocelli, or stemmata, and in
the phyllopods and other crustacea, as the frontal sense organs.

The history of these organs is an important lesson in evolution. It affords an
impressive illustration of the essentially unalterable character of the procephalic
sense organs, and it distinctly sharpens our perspective of the long series of inter-
mediate forms that connect the most primitive segmented animals with the modern
ones.

I. THE OLFACTORY ORGAN OF LIMULUS.

Structure in Adult Limulus.—Gross Structure.—In an adult Limulus, the
olfactory organ (subfrontal schlerite of Lankester) is a bi-lobed, wart-like thicken-
ing of the cuticula, from 5-8 mm. wide, situated in the median line, 30-40 mm.
in front of the mouth. (Figs. 38, 39, 70, ol.o.) It is innervated by three large
nerves, a median and two lateral ones.

The olfactory cuticula is provided with a central cluster of sensory spines and
is perforated by many sensory and glandular openings. (Fig. 109, A.) The
under-lying ectoderm is pigmented, and just beneath it are many branching nerve
fibers, together with ganglionic or sensory cells, and a large number, about
1500, flask shaped, or spherical, slime buds.

The most conspicuous parts of the olfactory organ are the slime buds,
which are, with few exceptions, sharply confined within the area of the olfactory
schlerite. They have the usual form and structure, as described in the chapter on
the gustatory organs (p. 116), the only noticeable peculiarity being the clusters
of small ganglionic or sensory cells lying near, or on, their outer surface. (Fig.
88, a.)

Minute Structurc.—The minute structure of the olfactory organ has not been
satisfactorily determined, especially the character of the nerve terminals. So

160

OLFACTORY ORGANS OF LIMULUS. 161

far as I have been able to discover without a thorough application of either the
methylene blue or the Golgi method, there are three ways in which the nerves
may terminate in the region of the olfactory organ. The median nerve, be-
fore reaching the organ, breaks up into numerous small branches which are
distributed in the central portion of the organ. (Fig. 109, m.ol.n.) The two
lateral nerves terminate in oblong masses of very large ganglion cells, just be-
neath the lateral margin of the organ. From these ganglia numerous branches
arise that are distributed to the olfactory organ and to a considerable area of the
surrounding epidermis.

The finer branches from both sources form a sub;epithelial plexus, from which
still smaller branches are distributed over the surface of the slime buds. Others,

Fic. 109.—The olfactory organ of Limulus. A, Olfactory organ of the adult, seen from the outer surface;
B, cross-section through the olfactory organ of a young Limulus, about seven inches long (Flemming’s solution);
C, longitudinal section through the root of the lateral olfactory nerve of a young Limulus, showing the ommatidia-
like clusters of large cells with rod-like enclosures, derived from the primitive segmental sense organs.
possibly derived exclusively from the lateral olfactory nerves, end in peculiar
ill defined masses of cells that are either wedged in between the slime buds, or lie
against the epidermis. (Fig. 88.) They may possibly be connected with slender
sensory cells, similar to those in the gustatory organs, that extend into the
hollow spines and into the narrow canals leading to the outer surface.

Finally there appears to be a system of fine nerve strands that penetrate
the soft chitenous exoskeleton surrounding the olfactory organ, where they form
loose meshworks in superimposed layers. ‘These fibers resemble those seen in
the cornea of mammals, and although of very uniform caliber they appear to dif-
fer from the branching hyphe of the parasitic fungus (Macrocystis) that is fre-
quently seen in this region. The hyphe take up the methylene blue in a similar
manner to nerve fibers, and at first sight might be easily mistaken for them.
However, recent preparations in von Rath’s fluid show, in addition to the hy-
phe above mentioned, branching fibers that appear to be true nerve-fibers.

It

162 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

Although the minute structure and the function of this organ need further
study, there is no question that it is a true sense organ of great morphological
significance.

The Development of the Olfactory Organ and Nerves.—The Olfactory
Placodes.—The primary olfactory organ of Limulus represents a segmental sense
organ serially homologous with the lateral eyes and the ocelli. It is first seen as a
pair of sensory thickenings on the anterior margin of the lateral eye ganglion,
behind the median eye tubes. (Fig. 141, o/.o.) It is connected with the middle
lobe of this ganglion by the lateral olfactory nerve. (Figs. 36-39.)

Each organ soon separates bodily from the ectoderm. Although there is no
visible infolding, the cells which have the appearance of visual cells, are inverted
in the process and become filled with a dense mass of white pigment (guanin ?).
(Fig. 37, 4.) At the same time certain cells filled with the same kind of pigment
migrate forward from each placode, forming a gradually widening, sub-epithelial
plexus of branching pigment cells connected with the anterior margin of the
placode by a short thick stalk. (Fig. 36, p.st.) During the early embryonic
stages the placodes move toward the remnants of the anterior neuropore and
there unite in the median line, meantime acquiring a connection with the anterior
surface of the cerebral hemispheres and the olfactory lobes. (Fig. 142.)

Lateral Olfactory Nerve.—In the following stages, the united placodes move
forward beneath the integument toward their position in the adult. During
this process, the lateral olfactory nerves become greatly elongated and the cells
of the original placodes are now scattered as ganglion cells along the nerve,
but forming a special enlargement at either end. ‘These terminal masses consist
of irregular clusters of five or six large pear-shaped cells which greatly resemble
the ommatidial cells of the paired ocelli, not only in their shape and arrange-
ment, but in the presence of the clear refractive rods, or rhabdoms, on their side
walls. (Fig. 109,C.)

In young Limuli (2-3 in.), the peripheral end of the lateral olfactories still
terminates in a compact, club-shaped mass of metamorphosed visual cells. (109,
B.l.oln.) It also sends out several fine nerve branches which ramify widely under
the skin, in the region surrounding the main olfactory organ. (Fig. 70.) At
the same time the terminal group of cells breaks up into irregular clusters scattered
among the branches of the nerve. In the ordinary methods of preparation, each
cluster has the appearance of an isolated ommatidium composed of large pear-
shaped ganglion cells, whose proximal ends form coarse nerve tubes. There is
another group of cells, similar to those just described, scattered along the proxi-
mal end of the main nerve, some of them outside the brain sheath, but the major-
ity within it, on the root of the nerve as it passes over the surface of the hemi-
spheres. (Figs. 39, 48, 51, 66, 109, ol.l.m. and gc! and gc?.)

Both these cell groups, which contain granules that have a glistening white
appearance in reflected light, are the modified descendants of the cells constitut-
ing the original visual placode. Even in the adult, they still show traces of

OLFACTORY ORGAN OF LIMULUS. 163

the white pigment, of the refractive visual rods or rhabdoms, and of their primi-
tive grouping into ommatidia.

In young Limuli, the roots of the lateral olfactories become less compact, and
as they were seldom seen in methylene blue preparations, it was very difficult to
follow them. They appear to shift their point of attachment from the second
optic ganglion, toward the inner face of the olfactory lobes, near the tract uniting
the median and lateral eye centers (Fig. 51, oc.tr.) Whether they passed through
this tract to the olfactory lobes could not be determined. Ina few cases (methyl-
ene blue) a small strand of fibers was seen to leave the main root and pass
mesially toward the horns of the olfactory lobes. (Fig. 51, 2.)

Median Olfactory Nerve-—When the united olfactory placodes move for-
ward away from the brain, a new outgrowth from the hemispheres and ol-
factory lobes appears which follows the placodes forward, or is drawn out by
them, to form the median olfactory nerve. (Figs. 38, 39, 41, 48, 66, ol.m.n.) It
consists of large globular masses of minute ganglion cells, each lobule con-
taining a central core of medullary substance, similar to that in the
hemispheres.

In young Limuli (2 to 3 inches long) there are four distinct roots to the median
nerve, two hemal ones continuous with the horns of the olfactory lobes, and two
neural ones, continuous with the anterior median lobes of the cerebral hemispheres.
(Fig. 48.) Each root contains a medullary core of neuropile surrounded by a
cortex of “granule cells,” the cortex and neuropile passing without perceptible
change into the cortex and the neuropile of the cerebral hemispheres and the ol-
factory lobes. (Figs. 48, 51.)

In the adult, the two hzmal stalks disappear, while the two neural ones unite
and shift their attachment in a neuro-posterior direction, so that they are ultimately
widely separated from the apices of the olfactory lobes.

In larve about two inches long the distal ends of the three olfactory nerves
form a rich plexus of nerves terminating in a small patch of ectoderm that may
then be recognized as the definitive olfactory organ.

Summary.—The lateral olfactory nerves, then, are characterized as follows:
The “ganglion cells” are large and pear-shaped, and arranged in small ommatidia-
like clusters. Granule cells and neuropile are never present. The fibers are
coarse tubes, with distinct sheaths. The nerves terminate in the lateral portion
of the olfactory organ and in the surrounding integument. The ganglion cells of
the lateral olfactories are the metamorphosed visual cells of the initial olfactory
organ.

The median olfactory nerve represents a later, or secondary, outgrowth of the
hemispheres and of the olfactory lobes. Its ganglion consists of lobular masses of
granule cells and neuropile, and never contains large cells of a sensory nature.
Its end branches are bundles of naked fibers, or at least they have no visible
sheath. They terminate in the central region of the olfactory organ.

164 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

II. Tur Oxractory LOBES OF ARACHNIDS.

Development.—The olfactory lobes (organe stratifie, St. Remy) are prob-
ably present in all arthropods. They always form a conspicuous part of the fore-
brain in arachnids, but their functions and their relations to other parts of the
procephalon are unknown, except in Limulus where they are associated with the
olfactory nerves; their function is thus definitely indicated. It is singular that
Limulus is also the only form in which the lobes come into close morphological
relation with the nerve roots to the median ocelli.

In the scorpion and in spiders, the olfactory lobes arise from the walls of a
deep transverse groove extending across the anterior end of the medullary plate.
The groove probably represents the whole of the first neuromere, hence they repre-
sent the very anterior margin of the primitive nerve axis. (Figs. 15, 16, 20, 46.)

In the later stages, the groove closes and its walls form a conspicuous crescentic
band of small, deeply stainable cells, on the anterior heemal aspect of the fore-
brain, Figs. 41, 42 ol./.

The Olfactory Lobes of Limulus.

Development.—In Limulus, the olfactory lobes appear as two separate in-
foldings. (Figs. 141, 142, ol./.) Later the lobes unite and migrate backward
over the hemal surface of the brain, gradually changing from a thick, bi-lobed
transverse bar extending across the very anterior end of the brain, to an elongated
U-shaped disc lying on its hemal surface. (Fig. 36.) In the adult, the posterior -
margin of the bow extends backward, well below the middle of the cheliceral seg-
ment, farther back than its position in the half grown specimens shown in
Figs 47, B, 48, 51.

The lobe is formed from the posterior wall of the original infolding, the mem-
branous anterior wall disappearing during the later stages.

The entire margin of the lobes consists of very small, closely packed cells
resembling the granule cells of the cerebral cortex. As they freely absorb all
kinds of nuclear stains, the outlines of the lobes can usually be seen with great
distinctness.

In young Limuli the anterior arms of the bow-shaped lobes are drawn together,
forming two slender horns which up to the late larval stages, are continuous with
the lips of the anterior neuropore. (Fig. 36, A and B.) At about the time the
neuropore closes (after the trilobite stage) there is a vigorous forward outgrowth
at this point, apparently originating in the hemispheres. This forward outgrowth
carries with it the pointed ends of the olfactory lobes and the peculiar tissue of the
hemispheres, giving rise to the median olfactory nerve and its ganglion. Thus
the stalk of the median olfactory is continuous with both hemispheres and with
both horns of the olfactory lobes.

Structure.—As the crabs grow older, the cells on the median portions of the
lobes become very large, and divide into several distinct clusters. All the marginal

THE OLFACTORY LOBES IN LIMULUS. 165

cells, however, remain very small, and of uniform size from one end of the lobe
to the other; toward the center of the lobes, the cells gradually increase in size.
(Figs. 51 and 66.)

The small marginal cells send their neurites into two sharply defined bands
of very dense neuropile extending round the lobes. (Fig. 48, ol.np.) In the an-
terior horns, these bands become smaller, and unite to form a single band. The
latter extends to the apex of the horns, and is continued into the neuropile axis of
the median nerve. (Fig. 51.)

In methylene blue, either one or both of the bands often stand out very clearly,
with only a single regular row of nerve cells visible over each band. The dendrites
of these cells are very minute, show a longitudinal trend, and are confined to their
respective bands. See the posterior median part of the olfactory lobes in Fig. 51.

On the inner face of the deeper band (Fig. 48, ol.c’*) are two small bundles of
longitudinal fibers, derived in part from medium sized cells on the inner margin of
the lobes. (Fig. 51, o/.c?.) These bundles are continuous with the tracts arising
from the median eye centers. One or two bundles of heavier fibers lie below and
concentric with the ones just described. They arise from the cells of the fourth
optic lobe, op.f*. On reaching the opposite side, they turn outward and back-
ward, and join the main longitudinal, hemo-lateral tracts, c.op.f?.

Of the larger central cells of the olfactory lobes, we may recognize special
clusters of medium size cells sending neurites into the neuropile terminals of the
two pairs of median eye nerves, and hence to the circular bundles and to the tract
connecting them with the lateral eyes. (Fig. 51, ey.r?.)

Farther back is a large cluster of cells, generally very conspicuous, sending
richly branched neurites outward and backward, underneath (on the neural side),
the main marginal bands of the olfactory lobes, into the longitudinal hemo-lateral
tracts of the same side, or in wide curves to the same tracts of the opposite side.
(Fig. 51, ol.c’.)

Finally in the posterior bend of the olfactory lobes there are some very large
deep lying median cells that send their enormous branching neurites backward
into the median neuropile mass of the cheliceral ganglion and hence right and left
along the median hemal side of each crus ol. c’.

In the older crabs, the horns of the olfactory lobes gradually withdraw in a
posterior hemal direction and finally lose their connection with the median ol-
factory nerve root. Thus the main center of the olfactory lobes becomes relatively
isolated, unless, as it appears probable, the lateral nerves ultimately establish a
connection with them, through the median and lateral eye tracts.

III. THe OLractory ORGANS IN PHYLLOPODS. FRONTAL ORGANS.

The olfactory organ of Limulus undoubtedly represents a highly specialized
condition of the characteristic “frontal sense organs” of the phyllopods. Each
resembles the other in location, innervation, origin, and histological structure.

166 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

We may recognize two sets of organs in the phyllopods, the paired dorsal
ones and the unpaired ventral ones. They probably correspond to the stemmata,
or frontal ocelli of insects.

Branchipus.

In Branchipus the dorsal or paired frontal-organs consist of a compact mass
of small ganglion cells, with one or two large ones situated on either side of the
ocelli. (Figs. 95, 110, B.) The terminal cells are in contact with the unthick-

Fic. 110,—The parietal eye and olfactory organs, or frontal organs, of Branchipus. A, The median olfactory
nerve of a young larva, showing at the base of the nerve, the ganglionic enlargement, w, formed on the anterior
surface of the forebrain; B, « more mature specimen, showing the breaking up of the lobes into a nerve plexus
containing ommatidia-like clusters of cells; C, one of the cell clusters more highly magnified.

ened epidermis in the center of a faint rounded elevation. They are connected
with a small compact nerve, that runs parallel with the ocellar nerves, and that
arises from the anterior surface of the brain near the root of the lateral eye ganglion.

The embryonic organ is formed by the separation, from the base of the lateral
eye ganglion, of a small patch of neuro-epithelium, which then migrates under
the epidermis toward the anterior median line of the head.

The history of this organ, therefore, is practically identical with that of the
lateral, or primary olfactory placode of Limulus.

OLFACTORY ORGAN OF BRANCHIPUS AND APUS. 167

The ventral frontal-organ is unpaired and lies just in front of the ocelli.
In larve about ro mm. long, the organ is merely a rounded area, without any local
thickening of the chiten or epidermis, in which terminate a great many fine nerve
fibers, B, m.f.o. In very young larve the latter arise from the united anterior
ends of two thick ridges, or lobes, on the anterior surface of the forebrain. (Fig.
110, A,w.) These lobes are solid masses of cells like those in the forebrain and
undoubtedly arise as an outgrowth from it. In the later stages, therefore long
after the ocelli are fully formed, they increase greatly in size, expanding laterally
and forward, thus forming two wing-like plates, which still later break up into
many scattered sensory buds united by a nerve plexus, B, w.

Each sensory bud contains several radiating cells; the latter are clear on the
periphery, and their pointed inner ends are granular and capped by refractive
plates or rods, like those on the retinal cells. (Fig. 110, C.) These buds,
therefore, resemble the isolated ommatidia arising from the lateral olfactory
nerves in Limulus.

In the adult Branchipus, the buds are united with the brain by loose nerve
strands containing dark colored bipolar cells, the remnants of the stalk by which
the median olfactory lobes were connected with the brain. A small cluster of
nuclei, g., at the base of the median nerve represents the remnant of the unpaired
portion of the lobes.

Nowikoff, ’05, also recognizes the resemblance of these cell clusters (in Lim-
nadia) to groups of retinal cells, as I had previously done for Limulus in 1893.
He regards them as detached retinal cells belonging to the median ocellus. But
the development of these cells in Branchipus, long after the ocelli are formed, and
the development of the lateral olfactory organ in Limulus, show clearly enough
that the isolated ommatidia are formed from the breaking up of independent sense
organs, quite distinct from the median eye.

The median frontal organ of Branchipus clearly corresponds to the median
olfactory organ of Limulus, not only in its position, but in its development as a
ganglionic outgrowth of the forebrain. There is, however, this difference, that in
Branchipus there are no recognizable hemispheres, and the sensory buds are
formed from the median olfactory outgrowth, while in Limulus they are formed
from the lateral one.

Apus.

In Apus (Fig. 111), the frontal organ is represented by a thick oval sclerite
behind the eyes. Here the underlying ectoderm is thickened and contains ver-
tical fibers crossed by several layers of horizontal ones. Between these coarse
fibers is a network of large ganglion-like cells, that appear to be connected with
the branches of two large nerves lfm. (lateral olfactories), containing numerous
scattered ganglion cells. These nerves arise from the base of the lateral eye gan-
glia and are distributed over a wide area, behind and between the lateral eyes,
including the thickened ectoderm beneath the sclerite.

168 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

Similar conditions to those in Branchipus and Apus prevail in other phyllo-
pods, but we need not consider them here. It is enough to show that the remark-
able olfactory organ of Limulus becomes more intelligible when compared with the
condition of the frontal organs in phyllopods. In both cases we may witness
important steps in the transformation of primitive segmental sense organs into
a very special condition preparatory for, and in part realizing, a new function.

The causes lying back of this transformation are remote and probably in-
accessible. I formerly supposed that the unfavorable position of the organs in

Fic. 111.—Head of Apus, showing the eye chamber c.e.v. and its external opening, 0, the median frontal organ,
m.f.o, and the course of the lateral, frontal nerve, I. f.n.

Limulus might have had something to do with their loss of visual functions, but I
now regard this as merely a coincidence, since their position in the free swimming
phyllopods is not unfavorable to their use as eyes, and yet they have suffered a
similar transformation.

III. COMPARISON OF OLFACTORY ORGANS IN VERTEBRATES AND ARTHROPODS.

1. Number of Placodes.—In arthropods the olfactory organ arises from two
pairs of sensory placodes that still retain structures characteristic of visual cells.
According to the amount of median fusion that has taken place, the adult organ
may be regarded as a single unpaired one, (Limulus); or as three, a paired and
unpaired one, (Apus); or as two pairs, (Branchipus and other phyllopods.)

In vertebrates the primitive olfactory organ has been regarded by various
authors as single, paired, or multiple. The first view has been widely entertained,
especially by the older anatomists, and was based largely on the condition in
the cyclostomes and in Amphioxus. Of more recent authors, Burckhart, 1908, is
inclined to regard the vertebrate olfactory organ as formed by the fusion of two
pairs of placodes. Kuppfer distinguishes three parts in Petromyzon, an unpaired
one at the point where the neuron last closes and one on either side.

These conflicting views are intelligible on the assumption that the vertebrate
organ is derived from three or four separated anlagen, as it is in Limulus and the

COMPARISON WITH VERTEBRATES. 169

phyllopods, and that in both classes it may undergo varying degrees of fusion, or
of unequal development of its constituent parts.

2. Number of Nerves.—In the arthropods, the olfactory organ always
shows traces of two pairs of nerves, even when the organ itself is practically
unpaired. I pointed out in 1893 that the two pairs of olfactory nerves,
then known in but a few vertebrates, were comparable with the two pairs in
Limulus, but not with any other cranial nerves known elsewhere, either in verte-
brates or invertebrates; I stated that: ‘It is now known that each olfactory
nerve of the higher vertebrates is represented in amphibia by two distinct nerves,
which have been likened to the dorsal and ventral roots of a spinal nerve. But if
this were so they would differ from all other spinal nerves in that both dorsal and
ventral branches supply sense organs. Moreover, on any supposition they are
entirely different from those belonging to the other sense organs of the forebrain,
such as the lateral and parietal eye, and the auditory organ. This condition is
quite inexplicable on any theory founded on vertebrate anatomy. But this very
thing occurs in the olfactory organ of Limulus, although the meaning of it cannot
be explained there any more than in vertebrates.”

It is interesting to recall the statements made at that time, since they have
been in some respects so fully confirmed by the subsequent discovery of two pairs
of olfactory nerves by Pinkus 1894, in Protopterus; by Allis 1897, in Amia; by
Locy 1899, in the elasmobranchs; and by Zewertzoff 1902, in the embryos of Cer-
adotus. If the condition in Limulus had received more serious consideration, it is
very possible that the little ‘‘foot note” to the ancestral history of the vertebrate
brain, which according to Locy, is furnished by the development of the nervus
terminalis, might have expanded into a chapter.

3. Structure and Termination of the Nerves.—Arthropods. Both pairs
of nerves, while supplying the same organs, are widely different in their histo-
logical characters, and in their central termination. Both pairs are ganglionated.
The lateral nerves contain very coarse nerve fibers with distinct sheaths, and
scattered clusters of gigantic ganglion cells; they terminate in the base of the brain,
near the roots of the optic tracts. The median nerve contains fine sheathless
fibers, dense masses of neuropile and small ganglion cells; it has its roots in
the olfactory lobes and in the hemispheres.

The olfactory nerves are ‘“‘sui generis’ and are only remotely comparable
with any other cranial nerves, such as the optic nerves, the segmental gustatory
nerves, or with the components of less specialized peripheral nerves.

Verebrates. According to Locy, both pairs of olfactory nerves are ganglion-
ated, and although closely associated in their peripheral termination, have sepa-
rate central origins, hence they are considered to be separate nerves, not as
separate parts of one nerve.

What Pinkus says of the nervus terminalis, viz., “ Eine kolbige Anschwellung
dieses Nerven, welche durch die Einlagerung grosskerniger, von allen anderen
nervosen Zellen des Protopterus anscheinend verschiedenen Zellen bedingt ist,

I70 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

macht es wahrscheinlich dass wir es hier mit einem neuen Organ zu thun haben”
applies equally well to the lateral olfactory nerve of Limulus.

The nervus terminalis in elasmobranchs may have either a neuralor a hemal
origin, but it is generally closely connected with the lamina terminalis (Locy);
or according to Pinkus in Protopterus, it “Am vorderende des recessus preopticus
das Zweischenhirn verlast,”’ thus indicating its probable origin near the root of
the lateral eye ganglion, as opposed to the origin of the main olfactory from the
dorsal anterior surface of the hemispheres.

4. Origin of Olfactory Ganglia.—Arthropods. The lateral placode is
a primitive visual organ which becomes bodily converted into the giant
ganglion cells of the lateral nerves. The median placode is retained to form
the epithelial area in or near which all the nerves terminate. Its ganglion
cells are very minute and arise as outgrowths of the hemispheres and of the
olfactory lobes.

Vertebrates. The difference between the development of the median and
general placodes is unknown.

5. Position of Placode Cells.—Arthropods. The olfactory placodes
arise from the anterior lateral margin of the open medullary plate, but unlike the
adjacent visual placodes they are not swept into the neuroccele by the overgrowth
of the palial fold; consequently the sensory epithelium is upright, and does not
form the wall of a closed sac.

Vertebrates. The same.

6. Serial Location of the Placodes and their Migration.—In arthropods
(Limulus), the lateral olfactory placodes are originally located on the margins of
the medullary plate (procephalic lobes), between the median ocelli and the lateral
eyes; they therefore appear to form the second set of cranial sense organs and
nerves; the median ocelli forming the first set, and the lateral eyes, the third
(Fig. 142). The lateral olfactory placodes first move toward the anterior
median margin of the palial fold (edge of the neuropore) and then forward,
taking up a position in the adult either on the neural surface (Limulus), the apex
(Branchipus), or the hamal surface of the head (many phyllopods), its position in
each case being determined by local variations in the growth of the forebrain and
the external surface of the forehead. The arrangement of ocelli, olfactory organs,
and lateral eyes in the fully formed head, may, or may not, agree with their primi-
tive serial arrangement’ on the margins of the cephalic lobes. The olfactory
organs may stand alone in the adult (Limulus) or they may unite with the ocelli
and lateral eyes to form a compact median group (Apus, Limnadia etc.). (Figs.
8 and 111.)

In vertebrates the same conditions are indicated, but the serial order of the
ocellar, olfactory, and lateral eye placodes cannot be certainly determined in
vertebrates without locating their positions on the margins of the open neural
plate more accurately than has yet been done. Their serial order on the surface
of the head in the later stages is not decisive.

COMPARISON WITH VERTEBRATES. 171

During the closing of the medullary plate, the olfactory organs may or may
not unite in the median line; but they invariably move forward either to the
median neural surface (cyclostomes), or still farther forward onto the anterior
hemal side of the forehead. (Fig. 4.)

In most ostracoderms (Bothriolepis, Tremataspis, Cephalaspis), the olfactory
organs and the median and lateral eyes unite to form a very compact group on
the neural surface of the head, very similar to the grouping in Apus and other
phyllopods, where they may be located on either the neural or hemal surface.
(Figs. 5, 8, 12 and 111.)

In the cyclostomes, all the pro-cephalic sense organs are on the neural
surface, but they are not so compactly arranged as in the ostracoderms or in the
phyllopods.

7. The Olfactory Lobes.—Arthropods. In the arachnids, the olfactory
lobes make their appearance as a deep transverse infolding on the very an-
terior margin of the medullary plate. They soon sink below the surface and
move backward onto the hemal side of the forebrain. The posterior wall of the
infolding gives rise to the olfactory neurones; the anterior wall is membranous,
and later disappears. The cavity of the infolding, as long as it can be recognized,
communicates with the spaces between the hemispheres, and with those under
the palium, 7.e., with the potential first and second ventricles. (Figs. 46 and 47.)
The roots of the median olfactory nerve and the parietal eye nerves may be
located in the olfactory lobes.

Vertebrates. The olfactory lobes arise as deep transverse infoldings across
the anterior margin of the open medullary plate (frog), (Figs. 25 and 26),
therefore from precisely the same location and in the same manner as
in the arachnids. The lobes are finally located on the anterior hemal margin of
the forebrain, and their cavities communicate as in Limulus. They are the only
brain lobes that have a conspicuous connection with both the olfactory organ and
with the parietal eyes. (Figs. 43, 44.)

8. Function.—The olfactory organ of fishes is recognized to be an olfactory
organ largely on morphological evidence. Whether or no it actually has what
is commonly understood to be an olfactory function, whatever that may be, rests
on surmise. Nevertheless, it would still be proper to speak of it as an olfactory
organ, even if it were experimentally demonstrated that it reacted to sound or to
light, because we know that it is the true homologue of the olfactory organ in the
mammals,

It is well to bear this in mind in comparing the olfactory organ of arthropods
with that of vertebrates. Although our case rests primarily on morphological
evidence, the evidence afforded by function, while meager, is confirmatory.
Stimulation of the olfactory organ of Limulus with various kinds of food, with acids
and with ammonia, does not usually produce any characteristic reflexes. Even
drops of rather strong hydrochloric acid, or ammonia, have no more effect than
when applied to other parts of the body; they cause a slight start, nothing more.

172 THE OLFACTORY ORGANS AND THE OLFACTORY LOBES.

In order to test its glandular nature, the olfactory organ was cut out, its outer
surface wiped dry, and then the attached nerves stimulated with electricity;
no traces of a secretion appeared. But electrical stimulation of the olfactory
region in uninjured male crabs in some instances at once produced very remark-
able leg movements, rarely seen under any other circumstances.

When the electrodes are applied to the olfactory organs of the male, if the
experiment is successful, rapid chewing movements of the mandibles are produced,
accompanied by vigorous snapping of the chelicere, which may finally become
rigid and stretched out backward at full length. At the same time the second
pair of legs (the ones used to seize the females) which during all our preceding
experiments on the gustatory organs have remained motionless, are now quickly
and repeatedly flexed, as though trying to hug or grasp some object and force it
toward the mouth; all the other legs remain motionless. Stimulation of the region
about the olfactory organ, or along the median line between the olfactory organ
and the brain, or above the brain, may produce the same effect.

These experiments indicate that the olfactory organ is a chemotactic organ,
whose activities are associated with the process of eating, although it is difficult to
explain why the chewing movements are not produced by direct stimulation of the
olfactory organ with food. On the other hand, the extraordinary hugging and
grasping movements aroused in the second pair of legs of the males, when the
organ is electrically stimulated, indicate that it is used in finding the females during
the mating season. That an organ for this purpose must be present seems cer-
tain, for the males during the breeding season seek out the females and attach
themselves to them with great precision. In confinement, the males usually
attach themselves to the abdomen of the females, but males whose olfactory
organ had been cut out did not do so. Smearing the olfactory organs of males
with the ova or secretions of oviducts produces no effect.

In primitive vertebrates, the olfactory organ was doubtless of great importance
in mating, as indeed it is through the whole series of vertebrates. It is of special
interest that they were intimately associated with sexual activities in such remote
ancestors of the vertebrates as the arachnids. In this connection, the olfactory
function of the antennz of insects, and its relation to sexual reproduction will be
recalled.

Summary and Conclusion.

The gustatory organs play an important part throughout the entire range of
arthropods, and they have done so ever since the appendages have been used as
aids to nutrition. In Limulus, they form the most voluminous nerve tracts and
nerve centers of any single set of organs, and the great size of the hemispheres is
largely due to important gustatory centers that are located in them.

The olfactory apparatus and the olfactory function arose in the higher
arachnids through the secondary modifications of preexisting organs that had
some other function or meaning.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 173

The primary sensory functions of the marine arachnids were, therefore,
visual and gustatory, and the main centers for these functions lie respectively in
the optic ganglia and the primitive cerebral hemispheres.

In the higher marine arachnids, and toward the beginning of the ostracoderm,
or primitive vertebrate stage in phylogeny, the olfactory function, as a secondary
aid to nutritive and sexual activities, became definitely localized, and the most
anterior section of the forebrain was successfully preempted as the main olfactory
center.

The auditory function was definitely localized at a much later period than
any of the three preceding ones, and it has probably for that reason never suc-
ceeded in creating for itself a definite, sharply circumscribed, brain region.

CHAPTER XI.

FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Part I.

Introduction.—In the preceding chapters, we have shown that there is a
far reaching resemblance in structure and development between the brains of
vertebrates and arachnids. In this chapter, we shall show that they agree in
function, and in their physiological relations to other parts of the body.

In the arachnids, the location of several important cerebral centers is already
clearly indicated by the peripheral termination of the associated nerves, as for
example, the visual, gustatory, cardiac, and respiratory centers. Nevertheless,
it seemed highly desirable, indeed imperative, that there should be some experi-
mental evidence to demonstrate the course of the principal nerve impulses, and to
locate by experiment the centers that control a group of similar activities, or that
bring them into coordinate relation with other activities.

Although Limulus has the largest forebrain, or hemispheres, of any inverte-
brate known, it does not approach such animals as the hymenoptera, the cephalo-
pods, the crayfish, or the lobsters, in alertness, or in the variety of its responses to
visual, tactile, or other stimuli. When compared with the members of its own
class, such as the spiders and scorpions, it appears stupid and quite unaffected
by the events going on in the world about it. Limulus, no doubt, appears to lead
a sluggish life in the muddy bottoms of deep waters; but we should be greatly in
error if we were to estimate the probable volume and complexity of its coordinating
centers, or of what corresponds to the hemispheres of vertebrates, by its so-called
‘manifestation of intelligence.” Indeed Limulus would furnish very little material
that could be used for experimentation or observation along these lines. But,
for the study of some of the simpler reflexes, Limulus is not excelled by any other
animal.

The following experiments were made in the summer of 1897, at Woods Hole.
In the summer of 1898, Mr. Raymond Pearl, then a student at Dartmouth, work-
ing under my direction, repeated many of my experiments, and the following year
added others of hisown. More than seventy different operations were performed,
mostly on adult animals. They generally involved the transecting, or the remov-
ing, of various parts of the brain, or cord, in order to determine the path of nerve
impulses, or to locate the centers of control.

174

METHODS. 175

We shall describe a few of the more important ‘experiments, and summarize
the results of the others that bear on the main problems here under discussion.

* * * * * * * * *

The principal method of obtaining the normal reflexes was to place healthy
crabs on their backs on some conyenient table, allowing the posterior end of the
abdomen to hang over the edge. After a few minutes their muscles relax, and
unless disturbed, they remain perfectly quiet for a long time. Meantime, local
stimuli may be applied which, if a little care is exercised, usually produce very
definite reflexes without arousing the animal from its comatose condition.

The usual stimuli for the chewing reflexes, were drops of clam juice, or pieces
of clam, or the like, of the same temperature as the air; and a breath of warm air,
or the gentle touch of the finger tips, for the crossed thoracic, the abdomino-thor-
acic, or other temperature reflexes. Various other stimuli were also used from
time to time, as indicated in the description of results. Having familiarized
myself with the normal reflexes, the brain or cord was sectioned in various ways.
After the recovery from the shock, which lasts from five minutes to an hour or
two, the crab was tested as before and the difference in behavior noted.

The operations were performed in various ways, the principal difficulty being
to avoid the great loss of blood following any puncture of the skin near the brain
or cord.

When the section had to be accurately located, there was no way but to thor-
oughly bleed the animal, expose the parts, and section as desired at leisure. This
was the method followed in transecting one-half of the abdominal cord at a given
point, and in cutting it in halves lengthwise.

In transecting the collar, the animal was tied down and the legs fixed in a
convenient position; a quick cut was then made across the collar, care being used
to keep the opening in the skin as small as possible. ‘To prevent the loss of blood,
that spurts with great force from the opening, the wound was instantly
plugged with a tight fitting wad of absorbent cotton smeared with vaseline. If
the operation is successful, very little blood is lost, the animal quickly recovers,
and may live for six or eight weeks, or longer.

The principal errors to be guarded against arise from the difficulty of
making the sections in the desired place, and from the degeneration of the wounded
or isolated parts of the brain. In some cases, an isolated segment of the nerve
collar would degenerate and completely disappear in a few days after the operation;
or the degeneration may extend into other parts of the brain and vitiate the results.
In some of the most successful cases, the cut surfaces of the brain, after a lapse
of several weeks, were covered with an incrustation which, if removed, left the
surfaces almost as clean and sharply defined as when the wounds were
first made.

To check these sources of error, we have made careful post-mortem examina-
tions and have excluded all those experiments in which there is any doubt about
the location of the wound, or the extent of the degeneration.

176 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Experiment I—A.

August 16. Sectioned anterior end of left crus. (Fig. 113, A.I.) Before the operation,
it was found that if the crab came to rest on its back, and the margin of the abdomen was gently
touched with the fingers, the legs on the opposite side would always be raised a fraction of a second
before the legs of the same side. When the movements are once started, they become general.

After the operation, the left chelicera is very restless, snapping and moving aimlessly
back and forth. The second left leg is also restless, and usually elevated higher than the others.

I. Thoracic Reflexes.—Fifteen minutes later.

a. Hand, placed on left side of thorax, causes a slight start of left legs and left gills.
Reverse experiment gives corresponding results.

Fics. 112-113.— Brains of adult Limuli, that have been cut in various ways in order to determine the func-
tion of the principal brain regions and the course of the nerve impulses. All the figures show the brains from
the neural surface, with the right side toward the reader's right hand. The roman numerals indicate different
operations performed at different times on the same brain.

b. A little later the results are somewhat varied. The right legs are less readily induced
to make reflex movements by stimulation of either side than are the left.

c. Hand placed on the left side of thorax caused a slight stirring of the legs of both sides,
or a raising of the right or left legs, but no purposeful movements on either side. But placing
the hand on the right margin causes well marked, thrusting away movements of the right legs.

d. Twenty-four hours later, repeated c. with same results.

II. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—a. Fifteen minutes after the operation. Hand placed
on left margin of the abdomen causes sudden depression of the gills of both sides and raising of
the right legs. Reverse experiment gives corresponding results.

The gills on the side stimulated contract a little before those of the opposite side. This
is in marked contrast with the fact that the thoracic appendages of the opposite side always move
first when one side of tne abdomen is stimulated, showing that the abdominal reflexes
are mainly uncrossed, and the abdomino-thoracic are mainly crossed.

EXPERIMENTS. L7y

b. Twenty-four hours later. The right legs frequently perform spontaneous movements,
as in a normal crab, but the left are quiet unless stimulated.

c. Hand placed on the right margin of the abdomen causes very vigorous thrusting away move-
ments of left legs, more vigorous than can be produced in any other way. The right legs may
be raised and flexed in a sort of spasm, or may not; but they never thrash about as the left legs
do. The movements of the left legs are governed entirely by the stimulation, and cease when
the fingers are removed from the margin of the abdomen.

d. When the hand is placed on the left margin of the abdomen the right legs immediately
move back and forth in the usual manner, the left legs either remaining quiet, or spasmodically
flexed. If the crossed reflexes of the right legs are violent they may not cease on removing
the stimulus, and the animal may attempt to regain its upright position.

There is a marked difference between the movements of the right legs, in d, and of the left
ones inc. The movements of the right legs are those of a normal crab when stimulated. The
left legs may move more vigorously, in response to a crossed abdominal impulse, than the right,
but their movements are aimless, and cease with the cessation of the stimulus.

These experiments show conclusively the controlling and directing effect of the cerebral
hemispheres.

Experiment I—B.

Same animal. Thirty-six hours later. Cut all the free, post-oral cross commissures of the
thorax, leaving the vagus commissures intact. (Fig. 113, A. IJ.)

I. Thoracic Reflexes.—a. Ten minutes after the operation. Hand on either margin of
the thorax causes slight movements of the legs on the same side, but none whatever on the op-
posite one; except that when the right side was stimulated, the second leg on the left made vigor-
ous movements. ,

These experiments were repeated at intervals of one or two hours, with the same results,
except that the uncrossed reflexes gradually became more pronounced.

The experiment shows that there are crossed and uncrossed thoracic reflexes, and that the
crossed ones pass to the opposite side through the thoracic and the forebrain commissures.

II. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—a. Fifteen minutes after the second operation, hand
placed on the margin of the abdomen produced only faint movements of the legs of the same side.
On repeating the experiment, at intervals of an hour, the crossed, abdomino-thoracic reflexes
gradually appeared, and three or four hours later became well marked.

III. Gustatory Reflexes.—c. After cutting the left crus, the normal chewing movements
could be readily produced, except that the second left leg was spasmodic and irregular in its
movements.

b. After cutting the cross commissures, the chewing movements that could be induced on
the right were very feeble; none at all could be induced on the left. These negative results were
probably due to the feeble condition of the animal.

IV. Olfactory Reflexes.—On stimulating the olfactory organ with the electrodes, move-
ments of all the right thoracic appendages and the first two on the left are produced.

Experiment II—A.

August 6 Female. Sectioned thoracic cross commissures and the right crus back of
sixth leg. (Fig. 113, B, I.)
August 14. Crab is very restless when taken from the water. The thoracic appendages
are in almost constant motion, waving about in an aimless manner.
I. Thoracic Reflexes.—August 14. Uncrossed reflexes well marked; crossed, indistinct or
absent.
12

178 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

II. Abdomino-thoracic.—August 14. a. Hand placed on right side of abdomen causes
raising of the abdomen and flexing of left legs. Hand placed on left margin of abdomen, no
result; or if the fingers cover considerable area, a slight raising of abdomen may be produced.

b. August 25. Crab is vigorous. Hand, or even the tip of a finger, placed lightly on the
right margin of the abdomen causes raising of the left legs, followed shortly afterward by the
right, and then by generalmovements of both sides. Hand placed on the left margin of the
abdomen, and on the left gills, produces at first no effect; but if the stimulus is increased, then
the left legs are raised, followed by general movements, including movements of the right
legs. Experiment repeated many times, with same results.

III. Gustatory Reflexes.—a. August 7. Stimulation of jaws caused normal chewing
movements on either side, but movements of one side do not harmonize with those of the other.
b. August 25. Same.

IV. Respiratory Reflexes.—August 24. a. When at rest, the left abdominal appendages
are more elevated than the right.

b. Stimulation of the gill warts with clam causes twitching of the stimulated endopodites,
then several lateral movements, the members of each pair stimulated alternately crossing and
uncrossing over the median line, and finally a full, rhythmical, up and down, respiratory move-
ment of all the abdominal appendages.

Experiment II—B.

August 25. Cut both crura back of the chelicere. Subsequent examination showed that
the cut was made in front of the second neuromere on the left, and behind it on the right.
(Fig. 113, B.JZ.) General movements of the legs and respiratory movements of the gills
followed, but they lasted only a short time.

I. Gustatory Reflexes.—a. Immediately after operation, washed away the blood and
stimulated the jaws with clam, producing marked leg movement, as in chewing, but very feeble
jaw movement. 0b. Repeated the experiment after five minutes with same results. c. Again,
two days later, stimulation of jaws with food produces chewing reflexes, consisting of leg move-
ment only on the left; on the right, no reflexes.

II. Respiration.—a. On removing the crab from the water, all the left gills pulsate a few
times, the right remain motionless.

b. When returned to the water after long exposure to the air, the respiration becomes nearly
normal. The left legs are very restless and move back and forth in a lateral direction. The
right legs are relaxed and motionless, except the sixth, which is directed backward and moving
slightly.

c. Respiratory movements may now be induced by rubbing the gills with clam. The same
premonitory twitching and lateral movements as in experiment 1. Repeated frequently with
same results. When the movements are well under way, the left gills are raised higher than the
right.

III. Purposeful Movements of Sixth Leg.—When the fingers were placed on the left
abdominal appendages, the left, sixth leg was thrust repeatedly backward over the median sur
faces of the gills, with the very evident purpose of thrusting away the stimulating object. The
other appendages moved very slightly, but did not in any way make purposeful movements
on stimulation of thorax.

Experiment ITI—A.

July 29 Female. Cut the nerves to the endopodites of all the left abdominal appendages
about half way up the appendages. No other effects were observed than the loss of sensibility
of the left abdominal endopodites.

EXPERIMENTS. 179

This animal was then used for the following successful experiment. At the time the second
operation was made, the crab was in such good condition and its normal action had been so
little altered that it was not felt that confusion might result from this attempt to economize
material.

Experiment III—B.

The second operation was performed August 6,5 P.M. The autopsy, three weeks later,
showed that the left crus was sectioned close to the spinal cord, and all the thoracic cross com-
missures severed. (Fig. 113, C.I.) Atthe anterior end, the left crus was cut so that a small piece
of the left cerebral hemisphere remained attached to it. But only a very few cerebral cells, if
any, could have been connected with the crus.

I. Gustatory Reflexes.—a. Immediately after the operation, the chewing reflexes were
inhibited. Five minutes later, excellent reflexes, including the chelicere, were obtained on
both sides; but the two sides were not coordinated.

b. August 7,9 A.M. On stimulating right jaws with clam, obtain prompt and vigorous
chewing movements of the jaws, but with moderate, or normal chewing movements of the legs.

On stimulating left jaws, obtain at first the same results, but the leg movement gradually
grows more energetic till it is absurdly exaggerated in rapidity and range, and finally becomes
much confused, the legs moving wildly back and forth, and often clashing with one another.
This rapid movement may be followed by a spasmodic bending of the tips of two or three ap-
pendages into the mouth, where they are held in a trembling tetanus or rigor. All the left legs
are involved in this movement, except the left chelicera, whose nerve was cut a short distance
from the brain.

Repeated these experiments several times on August to, 14, and 26, obtaining in each case
essentially the same results. ,

II. Thoracic Reflexes.—a. August 7. On placing the fingers on the left side of the
thorax, there is no response, and if the left legs happen to be making the chewing movements,
the latter are not in the least disturbed.

b. Later. Fingers placed on the posterior, ventral surface of the left side cause no move-
ment beyond a slight start when the contact is made, and uneasy opening of the chele. But
on touching the anterior quarter of the ventral surface, rapid movements of the second and
third left legs are produced. These movements at first do not last long, and are inconspicuous
when compared with the movements that may be produced on the opposite side. But on the
following days they became distinctly purposeful, repelling movements.

c. August 7. On placing the hand on the right ventral side of the thorax, all the right legs
move furiously back and forth in unison, while the left continue their chewing movements as
before. ;

d. August 10. Hand placed on the right side of thorax causes active, purposeful thrusting
away niovements of the right legs.

e. August 25 and 27. Repeated a, 6, and d, with same results.

III. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—a. Placing the fingers on right margin of abdomen
caused back and forward movements of all the right legs (except chelicera) and with very
marked thrusting away movements of the sixth leg. No movements of the left legs.

b. Hand placed on the left margin caused obscure movements of the right legs.

c. Hand placed on either side of the margin of the abdomen caused faint, rhythmical con-
tractions of the gills of both sides, but movements of the right gills are the strongest.

d. August 26. Repeated a, b, and c, with same results.

IV. Temperature Reflexes.—a. August 25. On breathing gently on the ventral surface
of the quiescent crab, that had been lying on its back in the air for some time, a general muscular
spasm is instantly produced, All the legs are waved about, but the left legs are thrown into

180 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

prolonged violent movements during which they are convulsively flexed, and the tips thrown
repeatedly toward the mouth. ‘The right legs, meantime, becoming quiet.

b. As soon as the crab had quieted down, the experiment was repeated, but with the ut-
most care not to produce too violent a stimulus. The little puffs of warm air could be so regu-
lated as to cause the left legs to move, while the right remained motionless. The experiment
was repeated many times with the same results, showing that the left side reacted much more
readily than the right.

V. Respiration.—ca. August 7. When at rest in the air, the gills are twisted toward the
left, the left gills tightly compressed, the right ones slightly elevated. At first there was a tend-
ency for the left gills to move spontaneously in rhythmical respiratory movements. A week or
two later, the right gills frequently performed the normal yawning movements, or the normal
respiratory movements, the left gills remaining motionless.

b. Placed in water, normal respiratory movements begin at once, except that the left gills
are raised higher than the right.

c. August 26. Crab still vigorous. Repeat a and b with same results.

d. August 27. Stimulation of gills with clam, or finger tips, does not induce respiratory
movements.

VI. Equilibrium; Locomotion.—a. August 7. Crab rights itself repeatedly when placed on
its back in the aquarium. When righted, it constantly moves in a circle toward the left with
right side raised high on the legs, the left side depressed. The caudal spine turned to the
right, at an angle of about 20°. The crab, when righted, circulates to the left, because the
right legs alone make the motor movements. The circular movement continues for hours at a
time. August 27, condition same as a.

b. August 7. On removing the crab from the water and placing it on its back, the left
legs move restlessly and aimlessly, often bending the tips into or toward the mouth. Movement
continues for more than an hour. Right legs remain quiet, but may move vigorously if properly
stimulated.

c. At certain intervals, when in the air, all the right legs swing in unison forward, and then
with a vigorous stroke backward. The forward and backward movements are repeated many
times with great regularity, precisely as in swimming, except that the gills did not join in the move-
ment. The left legs never made these characteristic movements.

d. August 19. In water the crab sometimes fails to right itself. In such cases, the swim-
ming movement of the right legs may continue for hours with great regularity, but without
sufficient force to move the animal about. The left legs are meantime passive.

e. August 25, same conditions described in ¢ and d are retained.

VII. Autopsy.—August 27. Three weeks after the hemisection of the brain the crab was
alive and vigorous. On removing the brain, it was found that all the parts about the wound
were thickly incrusted with a granulated matter, which when removed showed the cut surfaces
of the commissures and of the crura to be very little changed. There was no indication of degen-
eration, or regeneration of the surrounding parts. There was a thick deposit of sepia colored
pigment about the wound in the forebrain. The cotton plugs were incrusted with a granular
matter, and they apparently had not interfered by pressure or otherwise with the action of the
nervous system.

Experiment IV—A.

August 25. Large female. Cut both crura in front of the second thoracic appendage.
(Fig. 113, DJ.) Immediately after the operation, the left legs moved restlessly, the right
remained quiet.

I. Thoracic Reflexes.—a. Immediately after the operation, no definite crossed or un-
crossed thoracic reflexes could be obtained by warming the sides of the thorax in the usual way.

EXPERIMENTS. 181

b. Several hours later. There was, in no case, any raising of the legs, or purposeful
thrusting away movements of the legs on either side, although faint movements of the opposite
legs followed a stimulation of the sides of the thorax.

c. If the hands were placed on the margin of the thorax while the chewing movements
were going on, the movements on the stimulated side were inhibited.

II. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—The following results are in marked contrast with the
above:

a. Hand placed on the margin of the abdomen causes raising of the legs of the opposite
side, where, they are held in a sort of tetanus, as long as the stimulus is applied. When the
fingers are removed, they instantly drop back on the carapace. There is no purpose in the
movements and it is difficult to understand their meaning. The legs of both sides may be
affected, but those on the side opposite to the stimulus are flexed first and to the greater extent.

III. Leg-gill Reflexes.—If the surface of the gills and operculum is touched, the sixth
legs at once make vigorous and well directed movements to rub the stimulated spot. If the
stimulation is on one side only, the sixth leg of the opposite side moves first and most vigorously.
The fifth and fourth legs may be, to some extent, involved in the movements.

The movements of the sixth legs, under these conditions, are remarkable. The ends of
the legs are rubbed against each other, and over the surface of the gills, something like the
“washing”? movements of the posterior pair of legs in a common house fly.

IV. Gustatory Reflexes.—a. Immediately after the operation, stimulation of the jaws
with food caused chewing movements of both legs and jaws on the left side, but none on the right
Three hours later, however, vigorous chewing movements were produced on both sides. The
coxal chewing movements were vigorous and normal, the leg movements greatly exaggerated.

V. Respiratory Reflexes.—Stimulating the gills with clam produced no effect.

Experiment IV—B.

Twenty-four hours later. Crab still shows remarkable vitality and spontaneity. Made
a sagittal cut through the cross commissures of the thorax and right crus, D,/Z. For a few
minutes after the cperation, the left legs are very restless and the right are quiet.

I. Thoracic Reflexes.—a. Hand placed on the right margin of thorax produces no
reflexes. On left margin, retraction of the left legs.

II. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—a. Hand placed on right margin of abdomen causes
slight movements of left legs, none of right.

b. Hand placed on left margin causes stronger movements than before of the left legs,
none of right.

c. Hand placed on the gills causes violent movement of left legs, none of right.

III.-Gustatory Reflexes.—a. Immediately after the operation, no chewing movements
could- be induced by stimulating the jaws with food. Applying the electrodes to the left jaws
caused movements of the corresponding legs, but no movements followed when they were ap-
plied to the right jaws. The right legs would not respond to any change of temperature,
whether applied directly or indirectly.

b. One hour later, obtained a faint chewing movement on the left side, on stimulating the
jaws with clam; none on the right.

IV. Respiratory Reflexes.—After the second operation, respiratory movements of the
gills ceased, and for twenty-four hours no rhythmical movements of the gills could be produced,
either by stimulation with clam, or by placing the crab in sea water. But the next morning the
following curious facts were observed. The crab was found on its back in the aquarium,
just as it had been left the previous day. No respiration had apparently taken place during the
night, as the gills were covered with a light sediment.

a. On removing the apparently dead crab from the water and stimulating the gills with

182 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

the electrodes, peculiar rhythmical contractions followed. The movements stopped in a few
moments.

b. On rubbing very gently a small piece of clam on the gills, the movements began again,
but more vigorous than before. On returning the crab to the water, the movements, which
had meantime ceased, began again and continued with some interruption, for purposes of
experimentation, for several hours. These movements were as follows: 1. The abdominal
appendages remained well elevated, pulsating in short strokes, once about every one and one-
half second, for twenty-five seconds. 2. Two full vertical pulsations then follow, each one being
a vigorous flattening of the appendages against the abdomen, followed by an elevation of the
same to their full height. 3. They move repeatedly back and forth across the median line,
rubbing the posterior surface of one appendage over the anterior surface of its mate, as though
rubbing or washing the gills. They may remain crossed and motionless for several seconds,
but finally return to their first position. 4. One full pulsation followed by 5. a long pause of
twenty-five seconds, and then the whole begins again. One whole series of movements takes
place in about seventy seconds, but this period may be gradually prolonged till all the move-
ments cease.

c. When the crab was taken from the water and placed on its back, the movements grad-
ually ceased.

d. Breathing on the gills produced only a slight contraction of the same. A drop of water
produced two or three faint pulsations. Scratching the abdominal appendages with the fingers,
or with a stick produced no result, but on rubbing them with a small bit of clam, the compli-
cated series of rhythmical movements described in b began at once.

Experiment V—A.

10.30 A. M. Large female. Sectioned both crura back of chelicera. All spontaneous
movements cease. (Fig. 113, £.I.)

I. Thoracic Reflexes.—a. Hand placed on either margin of the thorax causes contraction
of the gills of the same side, and later the raising of the legs of the opposite side. In both cases,
the legs on the side stimulated start slightly, but are not raised. No purposeful movements of
the legs are made to remove the irritation. ia

II. Gustatory Reflexes.—Three hours after the operation no chewing movements could
be produced by stimulating the jaws.

Experiment V—B.

3 P.M. Sectioned the right half of the ventral cord, in front of the first abdominal ganglion,
EIT.

I. Abdominal-thoracic Reflexes.—a. Hand placed on the left margin of the abdomen
caused raising of the right legs, first to sixth. Hand placed on the right margin, caused move-
ment of the fifth and sixth legs on the opposite side.

These two experiments show that impulses cross both above, and below, the cut, IJ.

Experiment V—C.

3.30 P.M. Made a sagittal cut through the vagus neuromeres, but without cutting the
free, thoracic cross commissures, E. ITI.

I. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—At first all crossed abdomino-thoracic reflexes ceased.

a. A few minutes later, placing hand on right margin of abdomen causes the fourth, fifth,
and sixth legs of left side to be raised.

6. Hand placed on left side of abdomen causes fifth and sixth legs of same side to be raised,
but these movements are not so strong as when the right side of the abdomen is stimulated.

Crab died after about twenty-four hours.

EXPERIMENTS. 183

Experiment VI—A.

August 11, 11 A. M. Exposed the spinal cord, and made a longitudinal median section
through the first abdominal ganglion. F.J. Ritythmical contractions of the gills followed, lasting
a short time.

Experiment VI—B.

The right cord was then cut across about midway between the brain and the first abdominal
ganglion. FIT.

I. Respiratory Reflexes.—a. At first no reflexes followed the section, but after one or
two minutes respiratory movements began. The left gills were raised much higher than the
tight, the latter being apparently dragged up by the left gills, rather than by their own action.
When respiratory movements ceased, the left gills remained in a higher position than the right.

b. When placed in the water, the respiration was at first about normal, but in a few min-
utes it almost ceased, leaving the left gills moving slowly, the right motionless. After about an
hour, respiration ceased, leaving the left gills raised, and the right closely pressed against the
abdomen.

II. Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—a. On placing the hand on the right margin of the
abdomen, all the left legs are promptly raised, remaining in that position till the hand is removed,
when they again fall back slowly into the thorax. The right legs are also raised, but after the
left.

b. Hand placed on the left margin of the abdomen causes raising of the right legs (but the
response is not as prompt and vigorous as that of the left legs in the previous experiment). The
left legs are not raised, but their chele stir uneasily.

c. Repeated a and b two hours later with the same results.

d. Stimulating with a weak electric current at b, causes contractions of the right gills, also
slight movements of the left gills (see below); at c, causes contractions of the left legs and the
gills on both sides; at a, causes contractions of the right legs.

e. 2.30 P.M. Applying electrodes at a, the right gills are slightly raised, and then moved
back and forth faintly as in respiration. Left gills move much less than right.

j. Stimulating at c, obtain movements of left gills and partial ones of the right, and with
vigorous and immediate movements of the left legs.

g. Stimulation at a, causes immediate movements of the right legs only.

We thus see that stimuli applied directly to the spinal cord produce uncrossed reflexes of
the appendages anterior to the cut, and both crossed and uncrossed below the cut.

But temperature impulses, starting on the sides of the abdomen and traveling centripetally,
produce both crossed and uncrossed reflexes in the thorax. It is not clear why direct stimulation
of the spinal cord should produce only uncrossed impulses above the point of stimulation.

Experiment VI—C.

3.30 P.M. Made an accurate sagittal cut through the vagus neuromeres, care being taken
not to cut the first three or four post-oral commissures. FP III

a. Stimulating at a or c, produced leg movements of the corresponding side, as before.

b. But stimulation of the margin of the abdomen and gills, with the hand, produced no
leg reflexes, although breathing on the legs, or dropping tepid water on them, produced prompt
movements of the same.

It would thus appear that all the uncrossed temperature impulses started in the abdomen
cross in the vagus neuromeres.

184 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Experiment VII—A. :

H

Adult male. Sectioned right cord (Fig. 113,G.J). Twitching of the right operculum and)
first right gill followed the operation. i

Experiment VII—B.

Cut the whole ventral cord in halves, lengthwise, G.I.

a. The caudal spine is thrown toward the left and remains so permanently.

b. On breathing on the abdomen and gills, the gills are retracted and the right legs alone
are raised.

c. Placing the fingers’on the left margin of the abdomen causes the raising of all the right
legs; the legs are strongly flexed and the points thrown medianly and backward. -

d. Hand on the right side produces no results, except that in some cases there is a slight
start of the left legs and a faint gaping of the chele, but no movement at all resembling those seen
on the opposite side of the body. This impulse probably reaches the forebrain through the
longitudinal integumentary nerve. (Fig. 70.)

e. One hour later. Repeated several times d, b, and c, with same results.

Experiment VIII.

July 29. Male. The right and left halves of the cord were separated behind the opercular
neuromere, by a median, longitudinal cut extending through all the abdominal neuromeres.
All the free, post-oral commissures of the brain were also cut, leaving the vagus commissures
intact.

I. Abdominal and Abdomino-thoracic Reflexes.—July 30. Stimulation of the left
side of the abdomen caused a drawing down of the left gills and an immediate and strong upward
movement of the right legs, followed by a slight raising of the legs on the left side. Stimulation
of the right side of the abdomen in the same way, produced the same result, and vice versa.
In both cases there was a movement of the tail toward the stimulated side.

The experiment shows unimpaired crossing of impulses in the vagus neuromeres.

II. Respiration.—July 29. The right and left halves of the gills were breathing in alter-
nation, the gills on the right side being raised while those on the left were depressed. The
coordination of the respiratory movements was perfect longitudinally, but the two sides were
beating independently.

Experiment IX.

I. Purposeful Reflexes of the Sixth Legs.—July 15. Male. Transected the right half
of the cord between the first and second gill neuromeres. (Fig. 113, H.9.)

July 18 and rg. a. Stimulation of the left side of the abdomen. Caused a drawing down
of the gills on the same side, together with a spasmodic, upward, non-purposeful movement of
the legs on the right side, followed by a purposeful movement of the sixth leg on the left side.

b. Stimulation of the right side of the abdomen gave same results vice versa, except that
in this case the sixth left leg (as before) performed the purposeful movement, the sixth on the
right being merely raised.

Abdominal stimulation produced no purposeful movements of the sixth leg on the cut side.

II. Yawning.—After the crab had been out of water for about an hour, it would yawn,
the operculum and the first gill, both right and left, moving in the usual way, while the gills
behind the cut behaved as follows: The left gills were raised in time with the operculum and
first gill, although they were not raised as high as in the normal animal. The right gills did not
move at all, except as they were slightly dragged upward by the left.

EXPERIMENTS. 185

III. Respiration.—Eight hours after operation. In air. As the gills behind the cut
began their opening phase, the left gills started first, and apparently dragged the right ones up
with them. When the gills closed, the left started down first and dragged the right after. The
operculum and the first gill behaved normally.

When the crab was put back in water, the respiratory movements would begin as described
above, but after a while they would become more nearly normal. From this it would appear
that the coordination of respiratory movements is brought about in some part of the nervous
system anterior to the abdominal neuromeres. Same results were obtained on seven succes-
sive days, the abnormality of the respiration in air being greater than in water.

IV. Swimming Movements.—July 23. The right and left operculum, the right and left
first gill and the four posterior left gills performed normal swimming movements in unison.
All the right gills behind the cut were either quiet, or respiring, while the others were swim-
ming. This indicates a center for the swimming movement of the gills in front of the free
abdominal neuromeres.

Experiment X.

July 19, 1898. Male. Both cords were cut between the neuromeres of the first and second
gills, H. ro. 4

I. Respiration.—a. July 29. In water. All the gills were breathing, but out of rhythm
The operculum and first gill moved together, but out of time with the posterior gills. In the
anterior group, the operculum was the first to start each inspiratory movement, and was followed
up by the first gill. The four gills behind the cut beat fairly well together, but the rhythm within
the group is imperfect and all are out of time with the anterior group. In the respiratory move-
ment of these four posterior gills, the most posterior one was the first to start the upward move-
ment. Results indicate that the gills behind the cut have been separated from their center of
coordination.

b. July 23 to 28. The four gills behind the cut frequently performed the ‘cross rubbing”
or ‘‘scraping’’ movement, the first gill not participating. This ‘‘cross rubbing’ movement of
the posterior gills was always followed by strong swimming movements of the operculum, first
gill, and thoracic appendages. At times, the operculum and first gill would stop, while the
appendages behind the cut kept on with unbroken rhythm; or the appendages in front of the
cut would be performing the swimming motions, while those behind the cut were breathing as
usual. This indicates a separate nerve mechanism for respiratory and locomotor activities of
the gills.

Experiment XI.

In another experiment, the cord was cut behind the second gill neuromere, H.12. Results:
1. the three gills behind the cut made the respiratory movements more vigorously and frequently
than the two gills in front of it; and 2. the operculum and the gills in front of the cut ‘‘yawned”’
frequently, while those behind the cut were motionless.

II. Swimming Movements.—At no time after the operation did the gills behind the cut,
in experiments X and XI, perform swimming movements. The abdominal appendages in
front of the cut made the swimming movements often and in a normal manner.

Miscellaneous Experiments.

The following results were obtained at various times by stimulating the cord and the peri-
pheral nerves with an induced electric current.

a. On stimulating any one of the posterior thoracic hamal nerves on the left side, the right
legs and the right halves of the operculum and gills were raised, the legs pointing toward the

186 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

region stimulated. The left legs make purposeful movements. The effect is not confined to
the appendage corresponding to the nerve stimulated, since after stimulating one nerve all the

legs of the opposite side are raised.

b. Stimulation of the longitudinal integumentary nerve gave no results.

c. The abdominal cord was transected between the neuromeres of the first and second gills.
Stimulating the proximal end of a hemal nerve in the isolated segment of the cord caused a

raising of the abdomen, followed by a very slight rhythmical movement of the gills.
d. Stimulation of a branchial nerve causes a contraction of the legs and gills of the same

side, but no rhythmical movement.
e. Stimulation of the right or left cord in front of the first abdominal ganglion causes con-

traction of legs and gills of the same side, but no rhythmical gill movements.

Part II.
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND ANATOMICAL RESULTS.

I. GustaTory REFLEXES.

a. Normal Action.—1. Each leg of the second to fifth pairs, when its taste organs are
stimulated, performs the chewing movements alone, without starting the action in the adjacent
legs of the same, or of the opposite side. 2. Stimulating the chilaria of one side may induce
chewing movements in all the legs of that side. 3. The chelicere have no ‘‘taste spines.”
They are brought into action by stimulating the taste organs on one or more of the other legs
of the same side. The action may then be transferred to its mate, if the stimulus is strong
enough. 4. When the taste organs of several legs on the same side are stimulated, all the legs
of that side work in a harmonious rhythm. 5. When both sides are stimulated, the rhythmic
movements of the right legs harmonize with that of the left. 6. There are two independent
movements in chewing, the lateral], or in and out movement of the jaw-like coxe, and the thrust-
ing of the tip of the legs in and out of the mouth.

Structure of the Gustatory Apparatus.—The principal reflexes described
above can be explained by the structure of the parts involved. The condi-
tions, so far as we have been able to analyze them by the anatomical and exper-
imental methods, are shown in a diagrammatic form in Fig. 114. We have
shown, for example, by the anatomical analysis, that : 1. The taste organ nerves
of the jaws, flabellum, and chilaria form distinct fascicles, whose inner ends
(after giving off local dendrites, g.c.') unite to form an immense, longitudinal
tract, g.ir., terminating in a voluminous mass of neuropile, or secondary taste
center, on the neuro-lateral surface of the cheliceral neuromere (diencephalon)
near the base of the cerebral peduncles, g.c.? 2. A tract extends beyond this
center along the cerebral peduncles to a tertiary center that forms a large lobe on the
median face of each hemisphere, g.c.* At the base of the hemispheres, underneath
the posterior median lobes and on the anterior neural surface of the cheliceral
neuromere, is a group of large nerve cells, ch.Hc., which by one set of dendrites
bring the secondary taste center into relation with the cerebral cortex of the same
side, and by another set with the opposite side of the collar, through the forebrain
commissure. 4. Finally a cluster of about fifteen large nerve cells, H.as.,
lying a little above the taste lobe, on the median surface of the hemispheres,
sends one set of extensive dendrites to the entire cerebral cortex, another to the

THE GUSTATORY APPARATUS. 187

secondary taste center, and a third along the surface of the mid- and hindbrain
neuromeres, probably terminating around the motor neurites at the base of each
pedal ganglion.

SSO gi me, Olfactory

Coordination

eo.or ter. Cent.
olf. vis. gust.

“H.ase ‘
- locom. swim.
i respir
(chive. P
ra Visual
\
\.
x Swallowing
\
4 Chewing
: d

: Gustatory tht

Locomotor

Equilibrium

Cardiac

Respiratory

cbt

Fic. 114.—Diagram of the brain of Limulus, showing the course of the principal nerve impulses, and the loca-
tion of the principal centers of control. The figure is constructed from the data obtained by experimental and ana-
tomical methods. Only the first and fourth thoracic, and the first branchial appendage on the right side of the
animal are shown. The most important points illustrated are (a) the primary, g.c'., secondary, g.c.?, and tertiary,
g.c.°, gustatory centers; (b) the relation of the motor, sensory, and association neurones to the muscles used in the
chewing reflexes; (c) the crossed thoracic temperature impulses; and (d) the crossing of the branchio-thoracic im-
pulses in the vagus neuromeres. The lettering of the neurones is the same as that in Figs. 56 to 66.

Closely associated with the secondary taste center is the “swallowing center,”
or the lateral stomodzal ganglion, st.g., lying on the median margins of the cheli-
ceral neuromere, next to the walls of the stomodeum. It is connected with its
mate by a special pre-oral commissure. _ st.c.

188 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

The Nerve-muscle Chewing Apparatus.—The leg movement in chewing
is produced by two muscles, a flexor and an extensor, both innervated by a branch
of the pedal nerve. (Fig. 114, ex? andfl’.) The motor nerve-cells of these mus-
cles while not certainly located probably lie in, or close to, the pedal ganglion, h’.

The jaw movement is controlled by nine muscles. The “in’’ movement is
produced by four plastro coxals, pl.cv., two in front, and two behind, going from
the edge of the plastron to the sides of the coxe; the ‘‘out”’ movement by the five
coxo-tergals, cx.t., two in front and three behind, extending from the base of the
coxa to the dorsal shield. These nine muscles are innervated by the anterior
and posterior ento-coxal nerves, a.en.cx. and p. en.cx. that spring from the clusters
of motor cells lying on the hemal side of the brain, one on each side of the pedal
ganglion. (Fig.66,H.) Each of these motor cells gives off numerous fibers to the
ento-coxal muscles; to the crus of the same side, and to the opposite crus, through
the corresponding commissure. (Fig. 114, h.)

Experimental Results.—The results obtained by cutting the collar at various
places are naturally not always intelligible, but when they are they appear to be
in harmony with the anatomical relations just described. These results are as
follows:

i. Cutting the posterior end of one crus, or of both crura, behind, or close
to the sixth thoracic neuromere does not materially affect the chewing reflexes.
2. Cutting across one crus close to the hemispheres, produces increased vigor, and
a diminished coordination in the chewing movements of the legs on the cut side.
The jaw movement is either unmodified or slightly diminished. If both crura
are cut, the above results are obtained on both sides. These operations not only
separate the hemispheres, but the main gustatory and swallowing centers from
the thoracic neuromeres. The results point to the presence of separate control-
ling centers on each side of the forebrain. 3. An isolated segment of the collar,
containing one or two neuromeres, lying between the second and sixth neuromeres,
and separated from the opposite side by cutting its cross commissures, may give
feeble, uncoordinated, gustatory reflexes, but such an isolated portion of the collar
generally degenerated and soon failed to give further response. 4. However, in
experiment IJJ—B, the left side of the collar was completely isolated and lived with-
out perceptible degeneration for three weeks. But this segment undoubtedly in-
cluded that part of the cheliceral neuromere containing the secondary gusta-
tory center and the swallowing center, and only a small part, if any, of the
hemisphere. This segment readily produced the chewing reflexes; the reflexes
were normal except for the exaggerated and uncoordinated leg movements on
the isolated side, and the lack of harmony between the chewing movements on
the one side with those on the other. The results show: a. that the coordination
and inhibition of the leg movements on the one side lie in the hemisphere of the
same side, probably in the large median lobe, or tertiary gustatory center; b. that
the rhythmic control of the chewing movements of one side is located in the second-
ary gustatory center in the cheliceral neuromere; and c. that the coordination of

COURSE OF NERVE IMPULSES. 189

the movements of the right and left sides is controlled by means of fibers in the
thoracic cross commissures, probably by the crossed collaterals of the motor
neurones.

The Swallowing Reflexes.—There are no nerves or sense organs visible
near the lips, or in the soft skin about the mouth; and no reflexes could be pro-
duced by touching these parts with food. “Swallowing” apparently depends on
preliminary stimulation of the coxal taste organs. The chewing movements are
often interrupted by a tetanic spasm of the legs and a prolonged “bite” of the
great mandibles on the sixth pair. During this period, a muscular spasm of the
stomodeum appears to take place, by means of which the materials that have
been tucked into the mouth by the coxal spurs are swallowed. The reflex is
probably initiated in the stomodeal ganglion by stimuli received from the anterior
end of the gustatory tract.

Course of Nerve Impulses in the Gustatory, Chewing, and Swallowing
Reflexes.—We may picture the probable course of the nerve impulses in the
chewing reflexes as follows: Stimulation of the gustatory cell, g.o, may 1. discharge
an impulse by the first set of collaterals directly to the motor neurones of its own
segment. 2. To produce the continued rhythmic discharge, it is apparently
necessary for the impulse to be conveyed to the secondary, or cheliceral center,
and then back to the motor neurones of the chewing muscles. 3. Impulses may
be carried from the secondary center to the tertiary center in the hemispheres;
this center appears to exercise a depressing, or inhibitory, control of the motor
neurones, especially of those supplying the flexors and extensors of the leg. 4.
The only way to arouse the motor neurones of a given leg or jaw to normal action
is via its own sensory fibers, either directly through the primary center, or indirectly
through the secondary center, or both. 5. The linear coordination of gustatory
movements on one side is affected by the cheliceral center of the same side. 6.
Bilateral coordination is affected via the thoracic cross commissures.

The remarkable difference in the action of the same leg muscles, when stimu-
lated via different sensory channels, 7.e., gustatory and general cutaneous, may be
due to several causes the nature of which is very obscure. They are indicated
to some extent by the known structure, and to some extent by the nature of the
reaction. The general cutaneous tracts, for example, are not so sharply defined
and are not composed of such distinct segmental fascicles as the gustatory tracts,
which may account for the fact that stimulation of a definite group of temperature
organs on one side of the shield usually produces a reaction in several legs of the
opposite side, not in one. Moreover stimulation of the temperature organs pro-
duces a rather ill defined leg movement, that at once ceases when the stimulus is
removed. If the taste organs are stimulated, a definite rhythmic action follows
that does not cease at once when the stimulus is removed. This may be due in
part to the fact that the stimulating action of the substance may in this case con-
-inue after the source of it has been removed, or in part to the presence of a ‘“‘center”’
which continues to act after the peripheral stimulus ceases. But even these con-

Igo FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

ditions do not explain the rhythmic repetition of the reactions in one case and the
absence of rhythm in the other. It indicates that there is some ‘‘ open and shut”
mechanism that can be reached and set into action via g.o., gc’, h; or via g., ge.”,
gc',h.; but not via th.t. gc.’, h. or via any other way.

II. THe Crossep THoracic REFLEXES.

The experiments show that: -

1. Gentle stimulation (temperature) on one side of the thorax first causes
aimless movements of the opposite legs, followed by aimless movements of the
legs on the same side. If the stimulation is increased, the legs of the same side
make coordinated movements that tend to thrust the stimulating object away;
and finally the opposite side may join in the coordinated movements.

2. If the nerve collar is cut on one side between, say, the second and third
neuromeres, stimulation of the cut side produces the same results as before,
except that the legs back of the cut, on the same side, do not make purposeful
“thrusting away”? movements, while those cephalad to the cut continue to do so,
if the sides of the thorax cephalad to the cut are stimulated.

3. If all the free thoracic commissures are cut, the crossed reflexes cease.

These results show: a. that certain coordinated purposeful movements on one
side of the thorax are controlled by the corresponding side of the forebrain, in
all probability by the corresponding hemisphere; 6. that the path of the direct
crossed impulses is through the thoracic commissures, and c. that the coordination
of purposeful movements on one side of the thorax with those on the other is
accomplished via the commissures at the base of the forebrain.

The simpler relations of these reflex paths are shown in connection with the
gustatory tracts in Fig. 114. It will be noted that while stimulation of the
temperature organs at ¢.f. produce a few simple movements of several legs of the
opposite side, stimulation of the taste cell at g.o. produces a continued rhythmic
discharge into the muscles at the base of one leg on the same side, with the result
that first a leg flexor, then a leg extensor muscle contracts, followed by the con-
traction of the four plastro coxals, pl.cx., and then by the five coxo-tergals, cv./.

III. THE CrossED AND UNCROSSED ABDOMINO-THORACIC REFLEXES.

When the ventral margin of the abdomen is gently stimulated, the legs on
the opposite side of the thorax are aimlessly raised, followed by a start or spasm
of the legs on the same side.

Numerous experiments show that a. the abdominal temperature impulses
may cross on entering the cord, passing cephalad to the opposite crus. (Fig. 114,
ab.i”); 6. that the greater number of impulses pass up the same side of the cord
they enter, and that all these impulses cross to the opposite side through the com-
missures of the vagus neuromeres, ab./*; c. that they do not cross in the free tho-
racic commissures.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS. Igi

The vagus neuromeres are therefore the centers for important decussations
of impulses passing cephalad on their way from the cord to the anterior brain
neuromeres, v.dec.

IV. Locomotion.

Locomotion is normally accomplished by coordinated walking movements
of the legs, or by a rhythmic beating of the legs and gills in unison, as in
swimming.

r. Cutting the collar on one side, behind the hemispheres, diminishes or
inhibits the walking or swimming movements on the cut side. Such animals
walk or swim in circles, turning toward the cut side because the legs on the uncut
side are the most active, or they are the only ones that make any walking or swim-
ming movements. In water, as in air, the legs on the uncut side frequently per-
form the normal swimming movement, while those on the cut side are quiescent,
or are performing some other reflexes, as, for example, chewing. We therefore
conclude that the primary reflex centers for locomotion lie in the last five thoracic
neuromeres, and for the “gill swimming” in the anterior neuromeres of the cord.
The secondary control centers lie in the forebrain, one on each side.

V. EQUILIBRIUM.

The nature of the apparatus by means of which the crab tends to right itself
is unknown, but apparently the part of the brain in which this function is centered
is near the first two vagus neuromeres. This is shown by the fact that cutting
across the anterior part of the collar, on one or both sides, or destroying the hemi-
spheres, or cutting the ventral cord behind the vagus neuromeres, does not destroy
the tendency, or the power, to turn the neural side down, when free to move;
while the cutting, or removal, of the vagus neuromeres does destroy this tendency.

VI. RESPIRATION.

The Respiratory Mechanism.—There are two distinct sets of respiratory
muscles, an adductor and an abductor for each abdominal appendage a.bm.
and e.bm.; and a large compound muscle, the branchio-thoracic, or hypobranchial,
attached by separate slips to the bases of all the branchial appendages. (Fig.
77, B, b.th.m. and Fig. 114.)

The abductors extend from the hemal entapophyses to the anterior wall,
and the adductors from the entapophyses to the posterior wall of the branchial
appendages. The branchial muscles are supplied by motor branches from the
branchial nerve; the sensory branches supply an elaborate system of free nerve-
ends, f.e., temperature, 0.4, and other sense organs, distributed over the surface
of the appendage.

The motor neuromeres for the branchial muscles form three groups, two
on the anterior hemal, and one on the posterior hemal side of the corresponding
ganglion to the branchial nerve. (Fig. 62, H**°')

192 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Each neurone sends an enormous number of dendrites into the ganglion,
mingling with the central ends of the sensory fibers, and a large number of fibers
through the branchial nerve to the anterior and posterior branchial muscles.
Isolation of these centers, by cutting the cord on both the anterior and pos-
terior sides of the ganglion, does not destroy the action of the corresponding
appendage.

The hypobranchial muscle extends diagonally forward from the tendinous
stigmata, or hollow infoldings at the base of the appendages, to the heemal surface
of the carapace. (Fig. 77.) It serves to flex the abdomen, but primarily to draw
the bases of the appendages forward and hemally, thus expanding the chamber
between the roots of the appendages, and drawing the water from the sides through
the gill leaves.

It is innervated by a large, longitudinal nerve, formed by the union of seven
segmental nerves, one from the hemal nerve of the opercular segment and one
from each of the six following hemal nerves. Each segmental bundle of nerve
fibers takes its origin from a cluster of neurones located on the opposite side of
the next preceding ganglion, close to the reflex center for that appendage. (Figs.
59 and 60.)

Respiratory Reflexes.—No final conclusion, as to the sources of the respi-
ratory impulses can be reached till the action of this nerve and muscle has been
experimentally demonstrated. It is clear that sectioning the cord at one or more
points would not be likely to greatly modify the action of the hypobranchial
muscle, as it would still receive nerves from the ganglia in front of and behind
the cuts. This point has been overlooked by Miss Hyde and has not been suffi-
ciently covered by our own experiments.

It seems probable that the contraction of the muscle as a whole may be
induced by impulses coming from one or more neuromeres through the roots of
the anterior, or hemal, nerves, and as such a contraction would affect all the gills
at the same time it would tend to unify their action and thus materially aid the
linear coordination of the respiratory rhythm.

The location of the common center controlling the whole series of branchial re-
flexes could not be determined, but judging from the forward displacement of the
motor cells and of the central ends of the accompanying sensory fibers, it probably
lies, in part, at any rate, in the vagus neuromeres. This conclusion is strengthened
by the fact that the destruction of the vagus neuromeres materially modifies the
respiratory activities. It apparently lowers the threshold that inhibits the “cross
rubbing” or the normal respiratory movements, for if the vagus neuromeres are
destroyed, or separated from the cord, gentle stimulation of the isolated gills
with tactile, temperature, or chemical agents, starts the respiratory reflexes in them
much more readily than in those not so isolated. Moreover, the forced “yawn-
ing” of the gills and the swimming movements, which represent a modified re-
spiratory movement, disappear in those gills that are not directly connected with
the vagus region. ‘There is also a striking difference in the rhythm, range, rate,

COMPARISON WITH VERTEBRATES. 193

and spontaneity of movements between the gills cut off from the hindbrain and
those that are united directly with it by one or both cords.

We may therefore conclude that each branchial neuromere contains only a
part of a respiratory reflex center; and that the inhibitory control and the coordi-
nation, or unification, of the respiratory and other related gill movements is
produced, in part, by the action of a special respiratory center located in the
vagus neuromeres, and in part by the hypobranchial nerve and muscle.

The coordination of right and left sides is affected via the cross commissures.

Comparison with Vertebrates.—The results obtained from an experi-
mental study of the respiratory centers of Limulus by Miss Hyde, Mr. Pearl and
myself are in essential agreement, and they harmonize with Miss Hyde’s work
on other invertebrates and on the skate. In her admirable paper on the “Localiza-
tion of the Respiratory Center in the Skate,” * she makes the following statements:

r. “Students working in my laboratory have proved that the relative position
of the respiratory center in the central nervous system of the acridide is practically
the same as in Limulus.

2. “The respiratory movements of the skate are segmental processes. The
relationship of the respiratory organs and their segmental centers is not so obvious
as it is in the lower forms (7.e., Limulus). The developmental changes of shifting
and consolidation have begun to mask the segmental connections of the different
parts of the brain.

3. ‘Each ganglion, through special fibers and cells, controls the activity of
the respiratory muscles with which it is segmentally related and is capable
of initiating impulses that produce coordinated rhythmical respiratory
movements.

4. “The medulla may be severed both from the cord and the regions of the
brain anterior to it, or divided along its median suture, into two bilateral halves
without impairing the functions of the respiratory center. Each half is capable
of sustaining coordinated respiratory movements which part of the time may be
different in rhythm on the two sides.

5. “Not only may either the spiracle and first gill arch, innervated by the
seventh and ninth nerves, or the last four gill arches, innervated by the tenth,
when isolated from the rest of the respiratory mechanism by a median and trans-
verse section continue their movements, but all other than the special part of
the respiratory center that controls these divisions may be destroyed, and either
the four gill arches or the spiracle and first gill arch will still pursue their coordi-
nated respiratory activity.

6. “The skate illustrates, in its type of respiratory center, an intermediate
stage, between the simple segmental arrangement of the neurons presiding over
the coordinated respiratory movements found among invertebrates, and the com-
plex, modified, and specialized centers existing in higher vertebrates.”

cs * * * * * * * *

1 Am. Journ. Physiol., 1904.

13

Ig4 FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAIN.

Thus the structural and physiological evidence indicates, beyond reasonabl
doubt, that the vagus neuromeres (opercular and chilarial) and the five branchiz
neuromeres of the marine arachnids have become consolidated into a single, compac
group, which in the vertebrates unites with the hindbrain to form the posteric
part of the medulla.

VII. THe CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES.

We have shown that in Limulus the hemispheres are primarily connecte
with the sensory nerves of but one sense organ, the olfactory. They contair
however, important secondary centers belonging to the visual and to the gustator
organs. They are true cerebral centers, both in structure and function, an
are similar to the primitive hemispheres of vertebrates, in that they regulate o
control a large number of complex activities of which the several primary refle
centers lie in the more remote parts of the central nervous system. ‘They, fo
example, exercise a tonic, or inhibitory, influence over the posterior part of th
brain and the cord, and they are the source of impulses that check, or maintain, o
coordinate, the walking and swimming movements, the leg movements in chewing
and the purposeful movements of the legs in removing local irritants.

CHAPTER NII.
THE HEART.

I. Location oF THE HEART.

In the annelids and in some primitive arthropods, the heart is a straight
tube lying on the opposite side of the body from the nerve cord, and extending
practically from one end of the body to the other.

In the typical arachnids and in many of the higher arthropods (insects and
crustacea), the primitive heart tube is shortened, in part by the conversion of the
anterior end into a non-contractile aorta, and in part by the absence of the more
posterior portion. The part that persists as a true pulsating heart is located, as
a rule, in the first eight post-thoracic segments, that is in the vagal and branchial
segments (Limulus and scorpion). (Fig. 3.) The heart may, in the earlier em-
bryonic stages, extend into the sixth (scorpion) (Figs. 15 and 16, /"), or into the
fifth and sixth thoracic segments (Limulus). (Figs. 141 to151.) But these more
anterior heart segments are less highly developed, and may be reduced to a non-
pulsating chamber that forms the proximal end of the aorta. The most volum-
inous part of the heart in the adult Limulus is its posterior part, opposite the middle
branchial appendages, z.e., between the third and seventh pair of ostia. (Fig. 1, B.)

The location of the heart is greatly influenced by, or itself controls, the loca-
tion of the tracheal stigmata, the lung books, and the gills, since all these organs
retreat from the anterior head region in nearly the same order, and usually occupy
about the same post-thoracic segments. (Fig. 3.)

The gradual retreat of the heart and the respiratory organs from the head and
thorax, and their concentration into a special group of post-thoracic segments
may be readily followed to its culmination in such forms as Limulus, scorpion,
and spiders. This striking process becomes especially significant when it is seen
that in the vertebrates also these organs occupy, as nearly as one may determine,
the same metameres. (Fig. 3, D, 308.)

II. DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEartT.

The location of the heart is determined by very remote but persistent condi-
tions that affect the form and structure of the whole anterior part of the head and
trunk. The principal event in these changes, which have been and are pro-
gressive, affecting the embryos of all segmented animals alike but in a varying
degree, is the gradual disappearance from before backward of the segmented
lateral plates of mesoderm belonging to the head and thoracic metameres.

In Limulus, in the scorpion, and in spiders, the surviving mesoderm of the
cephalothorax consists almost exclusively of the six pairs of thoracic somites (head

195

196 THE HEART.

cavities) that give rise to the endocranium, the jaw and leg muscles, and the coxal
glands (head kidney). (Fig. 138, c.so.)

There is a conspicuous territory, lateral to the cephalic lobes and thoracic
appendages, that presents little or no indication of segmentation. (Figs. 15, 16,
19, 21, 31-33, 141-156.) It is covered by a thin layer of ectoderm with numerous
underlying, oval cells, or fiber cells, that are eventually converted into muscles,
or peculiar bodies resembling blood corpuscles. See vascular area (Chapter XIII,
page 232.)

Back of this region the lateral walls of the embryo are divided into distinct
segments. The peripheral margin of these segments, up to a comparatively late
embryonic period, ends in a kind of germ wall, where the advancing sheets of
ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm, or ‘yolk cells,’”’ merge into a common
primitive-streak-like thickening. (Fig. 134, g.w.)

In the vagal and branchial metameres, the lateral plates of mesoderm con-
sist of definite somatic and splanchnic layers, which enclose separate coelomic
chambers. In these regions, the fiber cells are absent, but numerous blood cor-
puscles are present, formed from liberated germ wall cells.

As the lateral ends of the mesodermic segments approach the hemal sur-
face, they separate from the germ wall, take on a crescentic form and, uniting with
their mates of the opposite side, form the walls of a heart segment, or cardiomere.
The cardiac ostia represent the spaces between the anterior and posterior walls
of the adjacent segments. (Figs. 136, 137, .)

Only the lateral plates of the sixth thoracic, the chelarial, opercular, and
five branchial segments form definite, or permanent, cardiomeres.

The ccelomic cavities, at the hemal ends of the segments that form cardio-
meres, become partly shut off to form the pericardial chamber. The neural
portion of the ccelom, belonging to the five branchial segments, forms the five
great veno-pericardiac canals.

As the margins of the lateral plates advance, the cardiac nerves follow after,
keeping close to the intersegmental thickenings of the ectoderm, thus reaching
the heart tube opposite the intersegmental ostia, a position which they retain
throughout life. (Figs. 115-151, s.c.7.)

As the lateral plates of the cardiac segments advance over the yolk, they
expand, fan-like, into the unoccupied yolk surface in front and behind more
rapidly than along the true parallels of the yolk sphere. The result is that when
they unite on the hemal surface, the anterior heart segments lie farther forward
in the thoracic territory than their neural ends. This unequal displacement
gradually carries the anterior end of the heart tube forward till it almost meets
the anterior end of the forebrain, which is being crowded backward in the opposite
direction. (Figs. 17, 26, 31, 138, 157.)

Thus in the later embryonic periods and in the adult, the original relation of
the cardiomeres to the neuromeres is greatly disguised, except in so far as it is
shown by the terminals of the segmental cardiac nerves.

DEVELOPMENT. 197

Owing to the rapid concrescence of the more posterior lateral plates, the yolk
ritory behind the tail end of the embryo is covered at an early period. Hence
ther apical growth must take place in a vertical direction, or in such a manner
to raise the apex of the tail off the surface of the egg. (Fig. 157, D.) Under
‘se new conditions, the formation of both neural and hemal surfaces takes
.ce at very nearly the same time, and under similar conditions. The heart
2s not extend into this region of the trunk.

It is thus seen that there are three natural divisions of the hemal surface,
ere the physical conditions are, necessarily, fundamentally different; namely,
the cephalothoracic, in the abdominal, and in the caudal. The factors that
yduce or control these conditions are the relations that exist between the rate of
ical and bilateral growth and the volume of the yolk sphere over which this
ywth is obliged to take place. (Figs. 17, 23, 34.)

Other Arachnids.—In the scorpion and in spiders (Epeira), the heart develops
essentially the same manner asin Limulus. (Figs. 15, 16, 17, 20, 22.)

The details of the process of heart formation, as seen in sections, especially
> stages immediately preceding, and during the concrescence of the cardio-
‘res, have not been worked out. They should receive more a careful study than
have been able to give them.

Comparison of Vertebrate and Arachnid Heart.—A study of the early
ges in the development of the heart in arachnids and primitive vertebrates
ows that in both classes we are dealing with different phases of the same process.
both classes, the heart is formed from the peripheral ends of lateral plates
longing to a variable number of branchial metameres. (Fig. 32-33.) These
ds grow in an anterior hemal direction and concresce in the median hemal
tface, behind the anterior end of the forebrain and the cephalic navel, or
ostoma.

In the arachnids, the heart is composed of a single layer of loose, striated
astomosing muscle cells covered by a fibrous membrane. (Fig. 2.) The
art tube is enclosed in a distinct pericardial chamber, the pericardial walls and
2 walls of the heart being continuous at the anterior and the posterior ends,
d at the points where the aortic trunks arise. (Fig. 118.) The heart is also
ached to the pericardial walls throughout the entire length of the neural and
mal surfaces by numerous connective tissue fibers and muscular strands.

The pericardium on the neural side forms a tough fibrous membrane of con-
lerable thickness, but it does not appear to contain muscular bands.

In the vertebrates, we may recognize the same kind of growth from the same
sion to the same region. In its earliest condition, the vertebrate heart is an
ial cord composed of a syncytial meshwork with irregular, interstitial spaces.
. Mollier.) This is the so-called mesenchematous stage of the amphibian and
achian heart. At a later period, the primary cord is metamorphosed into a
n-walled tube, the endocardial tube, and a muscular layer, or myocardium,
‘ms around it. The two layers are separated by an extraordinarily wide space,

198 THE HEART.

bridged by fine fibers. This space ultimately disappears and the inner and
outer tubes unite to form the definitive walls of the heart.

The volume and complexity of this primordial heart tube, its early appear-
ance, and its wide separation from the myocardium are most remarkable. These
conditions are not satisfactorily explained by the assumption that the cardiac
endothelium is a secondarily acquired investment of a primitive muscular heart
tube. Limulus has the largest and most complex heart of any living arthropod,
and if an endothelium layer is present in any invertebrate, it should be present
there, but a careful search in both adult and embryonic hearts failed to reveal any
trace of such a layer. It is possible that in vertebrates, the cardiac and peri-
cardiac walls of the arachnids have united to form a two-layered heart. But this
would not account for the presence of the cardiac ganglia on the outer surface of
the myocardium in vertebrates.

An alternative and preferable hypothesis would be to assume that the arach-
nid heart represents the ventricular portion in vertebrates, and that the posterior
posterior portion of the pericardial chamber represents the thinwalled auricu-
lar or atrial portion and the venous sinus. (Fig. 44.)

III. CrrcuLaTION.

Arachnids—The circulation in Limulus has reached a very high stage of devel-
opment. Milne Edwards, in his classic work on the anatomy of Limulus, says,
“The circulatory system of Limulus is more perfect and more complicated than
in any other arthropod. The venous blood, instead of being distributed in inter-
organic lacune, as in the crustacea, is, through a great part of its course, en-
closed in special vessels, having walls distinct from the adjacent organs, and
often rising by branches of remarkable delicacy and passing into chambers, well
circumscribed for the most part. The nourishing fluid passes from these reservoirs
into the gills, and hence, by a system of branchio-cardiac canals, to the peri-
cardial chamber and the heart, which is very large. It is then forced into the
tubular, resisting arteries, which have a most complex arrangement, with
frequent anastomoses and with terminal ramifications of marvellous tenuity and
richness, and which can be followed even in the most delicate membranes.”

The heart of Limulus is a voluminous muscular tube, ending blindly behind.
It is provided with eight pairs of slit-like openings, or ostia, each opening guarded
by two semilunar valves through which the blood enters the heart from the peri-
cardial chamber. (Figs. 115-118.) The blood is pumped forward, and escapes
through three pairs of aorte, one pair of cerebral arteries, and a frontal artery.
The three terminal arteries are guarded by one very large valve on the hemal
wall of the heart. The walls of the heart consist of a loosely felted mass of inter-
woven muscle bands, without any recognizable endothelium. (Fig. 2.)

Vertebrates—Comparison of the circulation in Limulus with that in verte-
brates is difficult. There are some striking resemblances and some equally
striking differences.

CIRCULATION. 199

The more general resemblance between the arachnid and vertebrate circu-
on is shown by the direction of the blood currents and by the distribution of

main arterial and venous trunks. (Fig. 118.) In Limulus, the blood flows
srally and neurally through five pairs of aortic trunks. The anterior pair
(internal carotids) go to the base of the brain, where they form a closed circle
und the cesophagus c¢:w. (circle of Willis around the infundibulum, Figs. 43,
_and then backward along the brain and spinal cord. The following four
rs are short trunks opening directly into two longitudinal channels in which
- blood flows forward ex.c. (external carotids) and backward (radices aorte)
o the unpaired aorta ao. Two large venous trunks (cardinals) collect the
od from the anterior, lateral, and posterior parts of the body and conduct it to
: gills.

Important changes, however, have taken place that we cannot explain satis-
torily. In vertebrates, the ostia have evidently closed without leaving any
ce behind; and apparently one of the posterior pairs of the venous channels,
>. now opens directly into the posterior end of the heart, instead of into the
‘icardial chamber (Cuvierian ducts). The relation of the gill chamber to the
‘ta has also been radically changed.

The curvature of the vertebrate heart, its splitting at the posterior end
telline veins), and its elimination from the trunk segments are more readily
derstood. These conditions are undoubtedly produced by the ‘“‘yolk navel,”
ich is in turn produced by the increasing size of the yolk sphere; that is, the
‘diac ends of the lateral plates belonging to the branchial segments are forced
the increasing size of the yolk sphere to reach the hemal surface of the egg in
: gradually shortening area between the overgrowing, precocious forebrain and
: anterior margin of the uncovered yolk surface (yolk navel). (Fig. 17.) As
s cardiac area is being continually shortened by the increasing precocity of the
ebrain, and by the increasing size of the yolk sphere, and as the heart itself is
antime increasing in volume, it is forced to assume the S-shaped loops so
iracteristic of vertebrates, in order to occupy the only space that is left open

it. (Fig. 44.) These loops, once initiated, are accentuated by the unequal
chanical stress of the enclosed blood current, which continues to sculpture and
uld the heart walls, as a river its banks, till organic equilibrium is again
ched in the four chambered heart of mammals.

The splitting of the posterior end of the heart in vertebrate embryos is the
ect result of the increasing size of the yolk sphere, which favors the early
icrescence on the hzmal side of the head of the anterior cardiomeres, but delays
concrescence of the more posterior ones, because they necessarily appear later
n the anterior ones, and have to travel over the arcs of larger circles. Thus

ununited posterior cardiomeres may form two divergent, pulsating vessels
elline veins) along the sides of the yolk navel, long after the anterior ones have
ted to form a single tube. (Figs. 17, 23.)

200 THE HEART.

IV . THe Carpiac NERVES AND GANGLIA.

Limulus gives us the most detailed available picture of the structure and
relations of the cardiac nerves in invertebrates.

We recognize five longitudinal cardiac nerves extending either over the sur-
face of the heart, or close to it; and seven or eight pairs of segmental or trans-
verse ones, which connect the longitudinal nerves with the vagus or branchial
neuromeres.

The Median Cord or Ganglion.—This is the primary nerve center for the
heart. It is a median cord of ganglion cells, readily visible to the naked eye,
lying on the hemal surface of the heart and extending from one end of the
heart to the other. (Fig. 115, m.c.n.)

It arises at an early embryonic period from a thickening of the overlying
ectoderm. It probably extended, in primitive arthropods, the whole length of
the body. Inthe forms I have studied (Acilius, Limulus, and scorpion), it extends,
during the embryonic period, over a longer territory than the heart and appears
to stand in the same relation to the hemal surface of the body that the middle
cord does to the neural surface. The median cord, therefore, belongs primarily
to the overlying ectoderm. It lies on the outer surface of the myocardium, and
is not at any point actually imbedded in it.

All the ganglion cells of the heart lie in the median cord, or at the roots of
the strands that arise from it.

The cardiac plexus is an irregular meshwork of nerve fibers, arising from
the median cord and spreading over the hemal surface of the heart. The strands
diminish in caliber and finally form slender bundles that penetrate the walls
of the heart, where most of them appear to end in minute end plates, on the surface
of the muscle strands.

The Lateral Cardiacs.—Many of the larger strands of the plexus unite on the
sides of the heart to form distinct lateral nerves, easily visible to the naked eye,
Lon.

The median cord, the plexus, and the lateral nerves stand out with great dis-
tinctness when treated with methylene blue, and they may be easily studied under
high powers, in preparations of the whole heart of either the young or the adult
animal. The lateral cardiacs never contain ganglion cells.

The pericardial nerves extend lengthwise on the side walls of the peri-
cardial chamber, breaking up, at either end, into minute fibers, the terminations
of which could not be certainly ascertained, p.m.

The Segmental Cardiacs.—There are seven or eight pairs of segmental
cardiac nerves, s.c.v. 7%: They arise from the seventh to the thirteenth hemal
nerves inclusive, in close connection with the rami communicantes of the hypo-
branchial nerves. (Fig. 59.) They extend to the hemal side of the body, giving
off numerous small branches to the neighboring muscles and integument. The
five branchial ones turn inward, giving off rami communicantes to the peri-

THE CARDIAC NERVES AND GANGLIA. 201

Fic, 115.—The heart and adjacent organs of an adult Limulus, showing the ostia; principal blood-vessels;

ganglionated median nerve, m.c.n.; the cardiac plexus; the pericardial nerves, p.v.; the lateral, l.c.n., and seg-
mental cardiacs, s.c.n. 6-13, From Patten and Redenbaugh; slightly modified.

202 THE HEART.

cardial nerves; some of them unite with the median cardiac, in the region
of the last five pairs of ostia. (Figs. 115-117.) The segmental cardiacs of the
seventh and eighth, or vagus neuromeres, unite to form one large nerve which
anastomoses with the pericardial trunks, but neither it, nor the sixth, could be
traced directly to the median cardiac.

* * * * * * * * *

The entire system of cardiac nerves probably represents a modification of a
primitive system of longitudinal and circular integumentary nerves distributed
to the skin, muscles, and other organs on the hemal surface of the body. With
the reduction of the primitive heart to a shorter, more compact organ, lying in the
posterior thoracic and branchial regions, there was a corresponding reduction
in the length of the several longitudinal nerves and in the number of pairs of seg-
mental cardiac nerves uniting the heart with the nerve cords.

In some arthropods it is probable that there is some connection between the
cardiac and the stomodzal nerves. (See Polici, Naples Mittheilung, 1908, and
other papers by the same author.) Such a connection, if it still exists in Limulus,
must be very minute, and can only be detected by a special application of the
methylene blue method.

V. THe Minute STRUCTURE OF THE CARDIAC GANGLION.

Nerve Cells.—We may recognize in the median cardiac nerve three different
kinds of ganglion cells: a. Small, multipolar cells that stain very quickly and
deeply in methylene blue, and that form a thick, irregular covering, several layers
deep, over the outer surface of the cord. (Fig. 116, gn.c’.) In exceptional cases, they
extend for some distance on to the larger, lateral branches of the plexus, where they
form irregular flakes or clusters; but I have never seen any isolated ganglion cells
on the lateral, or on the pericardial trunks, or on any of the smaller strands of
the cardiac plexus. I doubt very much whether any ganglion cells exist in the
heart outside the median cord, or the roots of the larger strands near where they
leave the cord.

In the adult, these cells are about 32s. in diameter. They are pear-
shaped, the cell body giving rise to many fine dendrites which form dense felted
masses of varicose fibers. One can usually distinguish among them one long
fiber, extending inward, diagonally across the inner surface of the median cord,
and out of it, through one of the branches of the other side.

These cells are very numerous in the heart segments belonging to the mid-
dle branchial neuromeres, where they form a thick and continuous but irregular
coating to the median cord.

Toward the anterior end of the heart, the cord becomes much smaller,
and in the first three or four segments, these cells are either absent or reduced
to a few, scattering clusters, usually located opposite the ostia. 6. The second
kind, Gn.c., consists of giant bipolar cells, which in theadult are about 140 x roop.

THE CARDIAC GANGLION. 203

They occupy the axial portion of the median cord, and are confined to the middle
and the posterior segments, none having been observed in the first three, or in the
last segment.

The body of these cells is seldom fully impregnated with methylene blue.
The nucleus, central protoplasm, and spiral fibers may be faintly outlined, in

Fic. 116.—The lateral margin of the ganglionated median nerve of the heart of an adult Limulus, from the
region of the sixth cardiomere; it shows the two kinds of ganglion cells, G.n.c. and gu.c.; the clusters of neuropile,
n.p.; and the paccinian-like terminals, P.c., imbedded in the muscular substances of the heart. Methylene-blue
preparation.

sharp contrast with the small, almost black, multipolar cells. Their enormous
axis cylinders, however, are usually deeply colored. They extend forward and
backward, apparently the whole length of the cord, bending from side to side, and

204 THE HEART.

giving off, from time to time, branching collaterals. Both collaterals and axones
appear to pass out of the cord, into the lateral plexus.

The axial portion of the cord also contains irregular masses of neuropile,
but whether they are derived from the axones of the giant cells, or from those of
the multipolar ones, or from both, could not be certainly determined. When too

Fic. 117.—Diagram illustrating the distribution of the cardiac neurones and their probable relations to the
branchial and vagus neuromeres. The heart and the nerve cord are shown projected onto the same plane
Vag. D., vagus division; Br. D., branchial division of the heart.

many fibers are not colored, one may see irregular baskets of intertwining fibrils
at frequent intervals all through the thicker parts of the cord, and in the larger
strands of the plexus, 2.p. Some are apparently free terminal arborescences,
others form a basket work around the body of the giant cells; or several multi-

THE CARDIAC GANGLION. 205

olar cells, together with their dendrites, form enveloping baskets around the
iody of the giant cells.

c. The third kind of cells consists of small, bipolar neurones, found in the
rst three or four segments of the heart. They are not numerous, and in some
ases they appear to be absent. They resemble the giant cells in shape, but are
maller and are deeply stained in methylene blue.

In the young Limuli, two or three inches long, the small cells are more clearly
rear-shaped and have fewer dendrites, the rounded body projecting freely from
he sides of the cord, to which it is attached by one or two branching processes.

Motor Terminals.—The larger strands forming the cardiac plexus lie on
he outer surface of the heart; the smaller branches gradually penetrate between
he muscle bundles to the deeper layers, where one may frequently see them
erminate in the characteristic motor end plates.

Sensory Terminals.—Toward the anterior end of the heart, on either side
if the median nerve, there are peculiar, spherical masses dimly visible, imbedded
n the muscle layers, that probably represent free sensory terminals. Two or
hree nerve fibers approach these bodies and form there concentric coils of fibrille,
vith two or three thicker vertical fibers in the center of the coils, P.c.

It is not possible to distinguish the fibers that enter the heart from the seg-
aental cardiacs from those that arise in the median nerve cord. All the ganglion
ells increase greatly in numbers with age.

Cardiac Ganglia in Vertebrates.—The great size of the median cardiac
ierve of arthropods and its conspicuous origin from the overlying ectoderm led
ae to look for a similar origin of the cardiac ganglia in vertebrates.

In trout embryos, in frog embryos (Rana septemtrionalis) of seven millimeters,
nd in chick embryos, from thirty to forty-eight hours, there is a thin, longitudinal
ord lying on the hemal surface of the heart, which resembles the median nerve
o the heart of Limulus, and which appears to be the anlage of the cardiac ganglion.
n the 30-36 hour stages of the chick, it extends along the surface of the auricles
nd ventricles for about 150 mm., and is connected, here and there, by swollen
trands, with the overlying ectoderm.

I was not able to follow in a satisfactory manner the history of this structure,
ut it seems to me probable, from its general appearance and location, that under
uitable conditions it will be possible to trace its development into the cardiac
anglia of the adult.

VI. EXPERIMENTS ON THE HEART.

In my notes from the summer of 1897, I find records of observations to the
ffect that the isolated heart continued to beat for many hours, either in salt solu-
on, or in a moist chamber; that small segments of the heart would continue to:
eat, provided a piece from the posterior part of the median ganglion was at-
iched; and that separate pieces that did not contain this part of the median nerve,

206 THE HEART.

or from which it had been removed, ceased to beat; and finally that the anterior
end of the median nerve (from the first three segments) did not control the heart
beat of its territory, since, in its absence, the first three segments would continue
to beat provided there was a nerve-fiber bridge to the posterior part of the median
ganglion.

ao,

Fic. 118.—Diagram of the heart, pericardium, and principal blood-vessels of Limulus. Arterial trunks in black;
veins in half tone. Seen from the hemal surface.

The following is a record of some experiments made three years later, by
R. Pearl, a student in Dartmouth College working under my direction:

A. July 27,1900. The heart was exposed and cleaned of connective tissue.

a. Stimulation of the median longitudinal nerve with a weak current
caused one long continuous systole. 6. Stimulation of the lateral cardiac nerves
caused an increase in the strength of the systole and in the rapidity of the beat.
The rhythmical beat continued during the stimulation. On removing the elec-
trodes a complete diastole followed. During the stimulation there was no com-
plete relaxation of the heart muscles between systoles. c¢. Stimulation of the

EXPERIMENTS. 207

gmental and the pericardial nerves gave no results. d. The median cardiac
2rve was now cut (transected) about one-third the distance from the anterior
id of the heart about in the middle of the third cardiomere. Rhythmic pulsation
‘that part of the heart in front of the cut stopped for half an hour. At the end
‘this time the anterior part began to beat again. e. Dissected out, and removed,
piece of the median cardiac nerve, about three-fourths of an inch long, from the
iterior end of the posterior part left after the first operation. All pulsations of
1e section of the heart without any median nerve (i.e., the fourth cardiomere,
oproximately) immediately ceased, while the parts in front and behind con-
nued to beat rhythmically. After-an- hour, the fourth cardiomere recovered
ad began beating with a rhythm of its own, distinct from that of the posterior
art of the heart. f. Stimulation of the lateral nerve of the fourth cardiomere,
bout one hour after operation e, caused one strong contraction of that part of the
eart instead of the increased beat, as before. Stimulation of the lateral nerve
E the posterior cardiomeres gave the same results as before, i.e., acceleration and
ugmentation of the beat. g. Stimulation of the hemal nerves of the branchial
euromeres, or of the branchial nerves, or of the ventral cord itself, produced no
fect on the heart beat. Stimulation of a lateral cardiac nerve, after removal of
ie median nerve, caused a contraction on the stimulated side only.

B. Rhythm of Heart Beat after Stimulation.—Counts were made of the
umber of beats per minute of the normal unstimulated heart, and also during
‘imulation of the various nerves. The results will be presented in tabular form.

a. Unstimulated, 32 beats per minute.

Electrodes on the median nerve, 24 beats per minute.

Electrodes on a lateral branch of the median nerve, 12 beats per minute.

Electrodes on a lateral branch of the median nerve, 14 beats per minute.

Stimulation of the lateral cardiac nerve caused a contraction of the side of the
eart stimulated, but did not affect the rhythm of the opposite side.

b. Unstimulated, 24 beats per minute.

Electrodes on median nerve (near middle of heart) 8 beats per minute.

Electrodes on median nerve (posterior end), 20 beats per minute.

Electgodes on lateral branch of median nerve, 6 beats per minute.

c. Placing the electrodes underneath the median nerve near the middle of
ae heart, inhibits the beat of the whole heart.

d. Placing the electrodes so far as possible on the muscles only of the heart,
oes not perceptibly affect the beat. Stimulation of the anterior abdominal
erves, or the abdominal neuromeres does not cause any perceptible change in the
hythm.

Carlson (Am. Journ. Physiol., 1894 and 1905) has made more elaborate ex-
eriments on the heart of Limulus than we have, but so far as our experiments and
is overlap, they are in agreement on the most important points. Carlson, how-
ver, was not aware of certain details in the histological structure of the median
erve, as indeed we were not at that time, which are essential to the interpretation

208 THE HEART.

of the experiments. Although he appears to have been influenced only by his
experiments on the living heart of Limulus, he has come to conclusions similar
to ourown. He says (Am. Journ. Phys., 1905, p. 472):

“We find in the heart of Limulus a condition similar to that in the vertebrate
heart, the venous end of the heart exhibiting the greatest automatism, the aortic
end, the least, or no, automatism.” There is another similarity between them,
in that “the regions of the heart exhibiting the greatest automatism have the
greatest number of ganglion cells.’ ‘And still another similarity in the dis-
tribution of the ganglion cells with reference to the myocard.”’ ‘In the vertebrate
heart, they are situated, in the main, on the surface of the myocard, and this is also
their position in the Limulus heart.”

VII. Toe Heart. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

Interpreting the preceding data on the morphology, minute structure, and
the activities of the heart, we may draw the following conclusions:

1. The heart of Limulus may be divided into two parts: a. An anterior, or
vagus division, consisting of three cardiomeres derived from the mesodermic
segments of the sixth, the seventh, and the eighth metameres, 7.e., from the sixth
leg, chelarial, and opercular metameres. The segmental cardiacs of this division
are united with the pericardial nerves but not directly with the cardiac ganglion.
The vagus division of the heart has a greatly diminished ganglionic center and
is devoid of the giant ganglion cells. It exhibits little or no automatism. b.
The posterior, or branchial division of the heart is derived from the mesoderm
of the five gill-bearing metameres. Each of these cardiomeres is connected
with its corresponding neuromere by a segmental cardiac nerve, from which
branches go to the cardiac ganglion and to the pericardial nerves. It contains
the greater part of the small ganglion cells and all of the largest bipolar cells.
It exhibits marked automatism. In the dead heart there is a perceptible con-
striction between the vagal and the branchial divisions.

2. The vagal and the branchial divisions of the heart in Limulus are compar-
able with the bulbar and ventricular divisions of the heart in vertebrates. That the
heart, as a whole, is comparable with that of the vertebrates is shown by the fact that
both organs arise on the hemal side of the head by the concrescence of mesoblastic
segments derived approximately from the same metameres. In both cases, the
absence of the cardiomeres in the forebrain region, and in the greater part of the
hindbrain region, may be traced to the absence there of the segmental lateral
plates of mesoderm.

3. The giant bipolar cells of the branchial division of the heart of Limulus are
the primary agents in producing the rhythmic beat of the entire heart. Any
part of the heart separated from these cells ceases to beat. When the heart is
stimulated by laying the electrodes on the under side of the median nerve, the
only place where the giant nerve cells are fully exposed, the heart at once ceases
to beat.

THE HEART. SUMMARY. 209

4. We may picture to ourselves, for the sake of an initial working hypothesis,
that the elements have some such arrangement as shown in Fig 117. It is
assumed; a. that the giant bipolar cells are the inhibitory agents and the centers
from which the rhythmic impulses radiate to all parts of the heart; b. they are
probably connected with the adjacent dorsal and lateral integument through
branches of the segmental nerves, and with the ventral cord, via the five or more
segmental cardiacs. The latter probably consist, in the main, of axones from
the giant cells, and possibly of axones from cells located in the branchial neuro-
meres; c. the dendrites of the giant cells are probably confined to the median cord;
they do not appear to extend into the plexus on the hemal surface of the heart,
or into the lateral nerves; d. the small multipolar cells are probably motor cells,
distributing their fibers through the main branches of the plexus to the lateral
nerves, and then forward (and backward?) to their terminals in the muscle cells
of the heart; e. afferent sensory fibers probably run from their paccinian corpus-
cle-like terminals either directly to the median cord, or to it via the lateral nerves.

On these assumptions, we may explain the experimental results as follows:

Placing the electrodes on the lateral nerves, or on the median surface of the
median one, or on the main transverse branches of the plexus, inhibits the heart-
beat to a varying extent because of the variable number of accelerator or inhibitory
fibers that are contained in a given nerve branch, or of the number of small
ganglion cells overlying the larger ones in the median cord. "The automatism of
the branchial section of the heart is due to the presence of the giant bipolar cells,
from which the rhythmic impulses pass in an axial direction-along the giant nerve
tubes the whole length of the heart. From these tubes numerous collaterals are
given off right and left, apparently connecting with the motor cells which are found
along the entire length of the heart, but less abundantly at the anterior than at
the posterior end. The giant cells are covered on the hemal and lateral sides by
thick layers of motor neurones, hence they can be reached only from the under
side of the median cord. When the cord is stimulated from that side complete
inhibition of the heart-beat follows.

It is difficult to understand why stimulation of the vagus and branchial
neuromeres and of the segmental cardiacs has so far produced no noticeable effects.
It is probable that a more careful investigation of this point will furnish important
results.

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SENSE ORGANS OF VERTEBRATES AND ARACHNIDS.

General Summary of Chapters I-XII.

1. The foundations of the nervous system of vertebrates are laid in the
trochosphere or ccelenterate stages, and the most important steps in its early
evolution were made in the rotifers, phyllopods, marine arachnids, and ostraco-
derms.

14

2TO GENERAL SUMMARY.

2. In all segmented animals the central nervous system is morphologically
identical.

3. In all segmented animals the three primary axes of bodily growth have
the same relation to the neural axis, 7.e., apical growth extends in a cephalo-caudal
direction parallel with the neural axis; transverse growth extends right and left
at right angles with the neural axis; and radial growth extends in an ovocentric
direction approximately at right angles to the other two.

4. The three axes of morphological and functional differentiation are co-
incident with, and follow the same direction as the axes of growth.

5. The axes of growth and differentiation lead in directions of diminishing
returns. .

6. In embryonic growth the ratio between the relative rate of apical and
bilateral growth, and the radius of the yolk sphere determines the relative time,
place, and conditions for the formation of the organs on the hemal or aboral
surface of the body.

7. The volume of the yolk sphere has been the most important variable
factor in modifying the mode of growth and the form of the body in the segmented
animals. Its increasing volume in the rotiferphyllopod-arachnid phylum has
in the higher arachnids and in the vertebrates greatly exaggerated the differ-
ences between the neural and hemal surfaces, and has been the chief cause
of the linear distortion and profound modification of the hemal portions of the
cephalic metameres. .

8. In the phyllopod-arachnid-vertebrate phylum the body grows by the
spasmodic generation of new groups of metameres at the caudal end of the body.
The new metameres of each generation are at the outset unlike those of the
preceding generation. Each generation of metameres gives rise to one of the
primary functional and morphological subdivisions of the body.

g. Cephalic organs and cerebral centers are laid down at the same time and
in the same order, each reflecting the condition of the other. The linear arrange-
ment of the principal functional centers in the arachnid brain was determined
by the historic order in which the principal subdivisions of the body were generated
during the phylogeny of the phyllopod-arachnid stock. The cephalo-caudal
order in which the principal functional centers are arranged in the vertebrate
brain indicates the historic order in which the corresponding peripheral organs
were evolved in the arachnids.

to. The distribution of functions and organs is determined primarily by
the nature of apical growth and by the conditions under which it takes place. It
is subject to a progressive readjustment due to a give-and-take exchange between
the new and the old organs in response to the physical demands incident to in-
creased size, and to other conditions created by growth. The actual arrangement
has been worked out subject to the following factors: 1. The necessary preced-
ence in functional activity; 2. priority in origin and the consequent preemption of
territory; 3. the demand for a location essential to effective action.

GENERAL SUMMARY. 211

tr. The transfer of functional centers always takes place in a cephalo-caudal
direction. The process consists in the progressive elimination of muscular,
excretory, nutritive, and structural tissues from the anterior end of the head, and
the corresponding increase of the same structures at some point farther back, the
degree of elimination varying, in the main, with the linear and lateral location
of the parts concerned. On the other hand, the primary sense organs, visual,
gustatory, and olfactory, and their cerebral centers, never shift their relative
positions, and steadily increase in volume and structural detail.

Hence there are three factors that determine the character of the anterior
end of the body; r. the progressive elimination of the more lateral, non-sensory
parts; 2. the increasing development of the more axial sensory and nervous ones;
and 3. the establishment of nervous continuity between the old nerve centers at
the anterior end of the body and the new ones at the posterior end as fast as the
latter are formed. Hence the anterior end of the body throughout the arachnid-
vertebrate stock tends to become more and more sensory, coordinating, and ad-
ministrative in character, while the posterior portion serves as the site for the more
modern and the more highly specialized functions.

12. From the very earliest stages in the evolution of metamerism, the fore-
brain region has been devoted to vision and coordination. The first group of
metameres to appear behind or around the mouth (diencephalic and mesen-
cephalic) were devoted to locomotion and to tasting, seizing, chewing, and other
ingestive functions. With the increased size due to the addition of a new group
of metameres, respiratory and circulatory organs became essential and they made
their appearance behind the ingestive region. Thus the three main functional
divisions of the head, the visual and coordinating, the gustatory and ingestive
(including the primordial endocranium for the attachment of chewing muscles)
and the cardiac and respiratory regions were established according to the historic
and inherently necessary order of their evolution. They were elaborated and
still further emphasized by the elimination of all other tissues and organs foreign
to these functions.

13. All the segmental sense organs had primarily some of the characteristics of
visual organs. They were located along the lateral margins of the medullary
plate in the fore- and midbrain regions. Throughout the entire phyllopod-
crustacean-arachnid-vertebrate stock two pairs of ocellar placodes are united to
form a true parietal eye. The retinal placodes of the parietal eye are located at
the dilated distal end of the vesicle; the proximal end is usually tubular and opens
either on the outer surface of the head, or into the forebrain vesicle.

Two other pairs of placodes form the stemmata, or frontal ocelli of insects,
or the frontal organs of phyllopods and various crustacea. In Limulus (probably
also in trilobites and merostommata) they become metamorphosed into true
olfactory organs and represent the preliminary stage of the olfactory organs of
vertebrates.

The lateral or compound eyes of arthropods belong to the most posterior

212 GENERAL SUMMARY.

procephalic, or first post-oral segment. They become involved during the em-
bryonic stages in the palial fold that grows over the forebrain, giving rise, in the
vertebrates, to the lateral eye retinas.

The auditory organs arose from a large midbrain placode near the base of
the fourth pair of thoracic appendages. (Limulus.)

14. The parietal eye is the most ancient of all cerebral sense organs and
attains its characteristic structure and location at a very early period in the history
of the arachnid phylum. It is usually functional before the lateral eyes have
made their appearance.

The site of the locomotor organs follows the center of gravity backward,
those in the oral region giving place to those of the mesocephalon; the latter to
those in the postcephalic and caudal regions. The excretory, digestive, and
reproductive organs follow in the same direction. (Fig. 308.) Their nerve
centers are of small size and their change of location does not visibly modify the
character of the nerve cords.

The lateral eyes are the next oldest. They are highly developed and impor-
tant functionally in the adult stages of nearly all the higher arthropods. During
the ostracoderm stage they were involved in the cerebral vesicle, and for a time
became practically useless, the parietal eye being the only one that was in a posi-
tion to serve as a visual organ. In the true vertebrates the lateral eyes regained
their function, and that of the parietal eye gradually disappeared.

The olfactory organ, while derived from organs probably as old as the parietal
eye, did not take on the morphological characters or the function of an olfactory
organ till the highest stages in the evolution of the marine arachnids were
reached.

The auditory organ is the most recently acquired. It is. dormant in the
arachnids, and apparently begins its period of growth and functional activity
in the lower vertebrates. It is the only one of the primary sense organs that shows
a notable increase in morphological complexity and in the range of its functional
activities during the evolution of the vertebrates.

15. The special cutaneous organs of arthropods include two distinct kinds,
the taste organs and the slime buds. Both sets of organs perform. various func-
tions and initiate various reactions, but all of them may be properly called taste
organs, since they react to a variety of chemical substances, either in the food
or in the surrounding media. Both kinds may be widely distributed in various
parts of the body, but those belonging to this category are sharply localized, and
are included, either separately or combined, in segmentally arranged fields that
are provided with special nerves and special tracts and centers in the brain.

In Limulus, taste organs are found in the mandibles of the thoracic append-
ages, except the first and last pair, in the chilaria, and the largest field of all in the
flabellum. In the scorpion they are found in the maxillaria, the genital papille,
and the pectines. In the mandibles of Limulus, the taste organs and slime buds
are located in separate fields, and both sets on stimulation produce chewing reac-

GENERAL SUMMARY. 213

tions. In the scorpion the genital papille and the pectines illustrate the con-
version of entire appendages into complex sense organs. The taste organs and
slime buds increase by division; the former may thus give rise to numerous
sensory cells arranged in long, straight lines.

The segmental taste organs and slime buds of arachnids are the forerunners
of the special cutaneous organs of vertebrates; the taste organs of the arachnids
corresponding with the taste buds of the vertebrates, and the slime buds probably
in part with the neuromasts or lateral line organs. The fields of taste organs
and slime buds of the arachnids are represented in vertebrates by the placodes
which initiate a line of taste organs, or of neuromasts. The structure of the organs,
the number and location of the principal lines of organs in the embryo, their
relation to peripheral nerves, and to the tracts in the brain, are in the main very
similar in both vertebrates and arachnids. (Figs. 58 and 65, g..7.)

In Limulus the enormous integumentary nerve of the cheliceral segment, Fig.
70, deserves special attention. It resembles the ramus lateralis accessorius,
which in ganoids and bony fishes is distributed to the back, tail, and fins, wher-
ever taste buds are found (Johnston). Unfortunately the character of the
terminals to this remarkable nerve in Limulus was not determined; but it is un-
questionably a purely sensory nerve, supplying the neural surface of the entire
posterior part of the body. Its ramification is specially rich around the
entrance to the gill chamber.

16. The general cutaneous sense organs in Limulus are scattered over all
parts of the body. They represent various minor modifications of the slime buds,
taste buds, and of free nerve endings, and serve either as tactile, temperature, or
chemotactic organs. They are connected with a loose subdermal nerve plexus
which, in the thoracic and abdominal shields, is derived from the ramifications
of the haemal nerves; that on the surface of the gills, operculum, and terminal
joints of the leg is derived from the ramifications of the neural nerves.

The central terminals of the general cutaneous components of the hemal
nerves end in a large tract on the median side of each crus, hemal to the gustatory
tract. (Fig. 56, G.c.ir.)

* *k * * *k * ok * *k

17. The peripheral nervous system of arachnids attains a condition similar
to that in vertebrates. There are two main systems of mixed nerves, the neural
and hemal. The neural nerves have enormous ganglia which develop independ-
ently of the neural axis; the hemal nerves are without ganglia. Both sets remain
separate in the anterior head region, but in the posterior head region, and in the
trunk, they may unite to form nerves of the spinal cord type, that is, single nerves
with separate roots, ganglionated neural ones and non-ganglionated hemal ones.

18. Further specialization takes place through the separation from the primi-
‘ive segmental nerves of those components that have similar peripheral and central
terminals, and their union to form a new system of nerves with a common central

214 GENERAL SUMMARY.

tract and a common centre, ¢.g., the segmental gustatory nerves. Orthe nerves from
a special group of neuromeres may break up into several sets of components which
then reunite to form new groups. For example, in the vagal and branchial complex
of arachnids, which represents seven neuromeres, we may recognize the following
groups of more or less independent components: a. the combined, almost exclu-
sively sensory nerves of the first two or three vagal appendages (scorpion); 6. and c.
the cardiac and intestinal components; d. the mixed nerves supplying the append-
ages, gills, lung books, or operculum; and e. the combined motor components
that constitute the hypobranchial nerve which supplies the compound hypo-
branchial muscle derived from all the branchial and vagal segments.

1g. The extent to which segmental nerves have been reduced to a single set
of highly specialized components, or broken up into several independent sets of
components, decreases in a cephalo-caudal direction. For example, each of the
three forebrain neuromeres in arachnids contains only the purely sensory nerves
of the olfactory organ and of the parietal eye and lateral eyes. In the six follow-
ing thoracic segments the nerves are largely sensory, the motor components being
reduced to the relatively small nerves supplying the muscles of the legs and those
passing from one side of the carapace to the other, or to those holding the endo-
cranium in place. All the procephalic and mesocephalic hamal muscles have
disappeared.

zo. A still further reduction of motor components took place in the verte-
brate brain with the fusion of the anterior thoracic appendages to form the im-
movable anterior arch of the mouth (pre-maxille and maxille); with the reduction
of the free thoracic appendages to external gills; with the fixation of the endo-
cranium by its fusion with the exoskeleton; and finally with the atrophy of nearly
all the branchial musculature in the air-breathing vertebrates.

21. The most important events in the conversion of the arachnid type of
brain into the vertebrate type were the transfer of the lateral eye placodes to the
interior of the cerebral vesicle; the closing of the neurostoma by the closure of the
medullary plate; the transfer of the optic ganglia to the roof of the midbrain; and
the union of the branchial neuromeres with those of the vagus region.

CHAPTER XIII.
EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

J. Primary CAUSES OF DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH.

Before we attempt to explain the meaning of the various embryonic stages in
arthropods and vertebrates, it is desirable to reach some conclusion, if possible,
as to the general nature of the causes, or conditions that are likely to control the
initial stages of growth. Even if it is quite impossible to detect the real causes,
it is well to make perfectly clear, merely as an aid to exposition, the mental attitude
in which the writer approaches his problem.

It is apparently assumed by some authors that differential growth takes place
in developing eggs because in some predetermined manner certain agents dis-
tribute to their proper places preformed materials, which then develop into
definite organs because they are made of the same material from which those
organs arose.

Such artificial explanations are now found only in the biological sciences and
are to be regarded as the decadent offspring of the doctrine of special creation.
They are pernicious, because the clever juggling of words and images fixes the
attention solely on the imaginary structure of imaginary things, thus leading one
to overlook the sequence of form and of physical and chemical conditions that
constitute the only measurable or accessible properties of living things.

An erratic boulder does not grow into a mountain like the one from which
it came, even if it is made of precisely the same kind of materials. And even if
some metaphysical geologist should succeed in picturing a planatasmal geo-
phore that was a mountain in miniature, or that stood for one, or represented one,
or was capable of becoming one, it makes little difference what expression one
uses, the real problem, and the only one of interest to a matter of fact geologist,
would be: What was the sequence of events in the evolution of that mountain?
What were the conditions immediately preceding each step in the process ?

The biologist should approach the problems of growth and morphology in
the same spirit. Let him study the changes of form and action as they occur,
with the hope of discovering a sufficient cause for each one. He should not use
omnipotence, either of a creator, or of heredity, or of chromosomes, to short
circuit the process of evolution.

I shall therefore throw aside, for the time being, all preconceived ideas as to
the ultimate composition of the ovum, or of the growing embryo, and shall consider,
as they appear at successive periods, some of the simpler physical and chemical
conditions likely to be determining factors in differential growth. It is assumed

215

216 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

that under certain fixed uniform conditions protoplasm, or some of its constitu-
ents, has the property of growing, that is of producing more material like itself,
the growth taking place in the three planes of space at a uniform rate and to an
unlimited extent. If any deviations from these results occur, it must be due to
new conditions that arise either outside the growing mass, or which are locally
created within the mass by growth itself.

It is evident that a single cell, or a group of like cells, endowed with this
initial power of self increase, in the very act of growing necessarily creates internal,
locally diverse physical and chemical conditions; and that these unlike conditions
will be arranged in regular graded zones. As it appears that these zones of unlike
conditions, in the main, coincide with the zones of histological and morphological
differentiation, they may be fairly assumed to be the principal causes of that
differentiation. That is, it appears that progressive differential growth is self-
creating, and that homogeneous, or undifferentiating growth is an impossibility.

The details in the end results may be colored or modified by the presence
at the outset of foreign materials, or by changes in the external environment,
but they appear to play such a subordinate part, compared to the internal condi-
tions created by growth itself, that for the present they may be neglected.
The medium in which growth takes place can never be homogeneous as regards
the intensity, or the location of the sources of light, heat, gravity, and chemical
agents, so that each part of a growing mass will have its own particular relations
to its surrounding medium. ‘The rate of growth, and its character will be variously
modified by these local conditions, so that neither a homogeneous body, nor a
spherical body could be produced, and, so far as we know, never is produced. The
inevitable result is some modification of a sphere consisting of concentric shells
or strata, each stratum having various local modifications of its surface.

If our initial mass of protoplasm begins its growth laden with dead or inert
materials, or on the surface of a yolk sphere, diversified local conditions are created
at each stage of growth that have a very definite directive influence on each sub-
sequent stage of growth.

It has long been recognized that the presence of yolk modifies the rate of
cell division and the character of the cells produced. But it has not, I believe,
been heretofore recognized that: 1. Radial symmetry is an inevitable result of the
physical conditions created by growth; 2. that the morphological structure of a
large class of animals is profoundly modified by the prevailing volume of the yolk
sphere over which the initial growth takes place; 3. that the gradual increase in
volume of the nutrient surface, accompanied by apical growth, necessarily results
in an unlike bipolar concrescence, bilateral symmetry, and a linear sequence of
unlike physical conditions, that in turn produce a linear series of unlike organs;
4. that the overlying strata formed in a spherical mass of cells, or in a disc growing
on a nutrient surface, such as ectoderm, somatic and splanchnic mesoderm and
endoderm, are the expression of the various physical conditions successively
created by growth. In other words, the whole triaxial framework of any animal

PRIMARY CAUSES OF DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH. 217

may be regarded as the inevitable expression of conditions successively created
by growth, or by the conditions under which growth takes place. External
environment and natural selection have nothing to do with these conditions,
neither does “heredity” initiate, or control, or create them; it merely imitates or re-
peats them. Hence, as a creator of the foundations of organic structure, we may
eliminate natural selection, and external environment, together with heredity and
all its ministering tribe of “‘corpuscles,”’ as we have eliminated the Gods of Love,
of War, and of Peace.

Let us illustrate our meaning more specifically. If cell division takes place
in two superficial planes at right angles to each other, a regularly expanding
polygon is formed. With its increasing area, the two division planes will tend to
fall into radial and tangential planes, and the polygon will become a flat, circular
disc, provided the rate of division in these planes coincides with the ratio between
the radii and the circumference of expanding circles. But as soon as such a disc
is formed, the central cells are placed under different conditions from the marginal
ones, as to nutrition, respiration, and tension; and in addition, the latter are
advancing into new territory by their own growth, and at the same time they are
crowded over it at a constantly increasing rate, by the division of those cells that
lie nearer the center than they do.

Thus a difference between the local rate of cell division, the local rate of
cell displacement, and the local rate of histological differentiation is established.
As the local augmentation or diminution of growth produced by these conditions
has no constant relation to the increasing radii and circumference, it follows that
the actual form of the disc will be a resultant of the various sets of forces. The
surface layers will not fit the deeper ones, or the central portions fit the periphery.
The disc must, therefore, either change its marginal contour, or its surface con-
tours, or both. That is, the areas of unequal growth stresses must express them-
selves either in a disc with a broken contour (a symmetrical polygon, hexagon ?),
or in a circular disc with symmetrically placed infoldings, or eruptions of its surface,
or both. (Fig. 119, A.B.)

If we now consider the vertical increment of our hypothetical group of cells,
it is clear that the conditions change more rapidly in a vertical direction, with
increasing thickness, than in a superficial horizontal one, with increasing width.
There is consequently a greater modification of the rate of growth and of special-
ization in a vertical direction than in a horizontal one. The inevitable result is,
therefore, not a homogeneous sphere, but a lens-shaped disc composed of unlike
concentric strata, z.e., ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, each stratum com-
posed of zones of unlike organs, concentric with the point of initial growth.

Thus a plan of an adult radiate, for example, seen from its oral surface in
mercator projection, presents a succession of ring-like zones, intersected by radii,
marking the distribution of like parts. The central area represents the point of
origin of the endoderm, or the blastopore, or the opening to the primitive gut.
Around this opening the various organs are arranged in concentric circles that are.

218 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

formed at successive periods, the oldest and most highly specialized around the
central infolding, the newest and least specialized on the periphery.

The bilateral type appears to have arisen from the radiate by a local
outgrowth from it, not by a transformation of its entire body. The outgrowth
gave rise to the new body, and the old body became the head of the new animal.

A premonitory stage of this transformation may be seen in the one tentacled
ccelenterate larvee, as I pointed out in 1889, and the same type may be again seen
in the trochosphere, and in the early embryonic stages of all segmented animals
We may represent such forms, laid down in mercator projection, by a racquet-
shaped plate, the large anterior end representing the body of the ccelenterate
that is to become the head, the handle representing the outgrowth from it that is
to form the new body. (Fig. 120.)

Fics. 119-120-121.— Diagrams. in mercator projection, illustrating the three principal types of growth,
and the coincident morphological and physiological differentiation. Fic. 119.—Radial type, showing the lines
of unequal physical and chemical stress created by radial growth, and their coincidence with the lines of
morphological differentiation. Fic. 120.—Apical bilateral type, showing the origin of bilateral symmetry,
apical growth, and metamerism, as a result of unequal radial growth. Fic. 121.—Apical asymmetrical type,
or false radial type, derived from the apical bilateral type, by the suppression of growth on one side.

Whatever may be the cause of the unequal radial growth, once established,
it automatically creates bilateral symmetry and metamerism. To illustrate: If
in a growing circular disc, there is, for any reason, a local increase of radial growth,
the resulting form will be oval, or triangular, or banjo-shaped. (Fig. 120.)
The isogeminal lines will then form two similar, converging series on either side
of the enlarged radius. At any time in the history of this organism, there will
be a graded linear series of cells, from the oldest at a, to the youngest at an, anda
double graded series from any point in a-an to the right, or left.

There can be but two points in the entire mass at any time that are alike
as to age, an environment, each one lying in a corresponding position to the other
on opposite sides of the principal axis of growth. As a result of apical growth,

INTERPRETATION OF THE EARLY STAGES. 2 250

a graded, tri-axial series of unlike environments. and three similar graded series of
cells, unlike as to age is established. This dual series of unlike conditions, and
cells of unlike lineage. coincides. as nearly as may be determined, with a third and
fourth series, namely the lines of morphological and physiological differentiation;
hence, the conclusion is justified that the two latter are the formal. or kinetic ex-
pression of the two former. That is. metamerism, or the succession of unlike
parts in a cephalo-caudal direction. bilateral symmetry. or the succession of
unlike parts in a bilateral direction, and the formation of superimposed germ layers.
are the inevitable results of the locally diverse physical and chemical conditions.
and the locally diverse cell lineages created by apical growth. They cannot
therefore be the result of the unfolding. or distribution, of diverse specific forma-
tive materials.

Tt would therefore appear that there is a definite order in which various tissues
are automatically created by their individual environments. the degree of histo-
logical specialization having a constant time and space relation to the germinal
axis. That is. if we assume that the nervous tissue is the most highly specialized.
then it is clear that at anv period of development. the most highly specialized tis-
ues predominate in the germinal axis. and that: a. the grade of specialization
diminishes from any point in that axis right and left to the germinal margin. or
to the periphery of each half metamere: and 6. the grade of development of each
member of the half metamere reaches its maximum at some point behind the
cephalic end of its series. and gradually diminishes toward the germinal apex
at the caudal end of the body. (Fig. 157.)

It will also be observed that in passing from the outside of the sphere inward.
the degree of morphological and physiological complexity in the four superimposed
layers varies Inversely as the distance from the germinal axis.

Conclusion.—Continuous aggregation of like materials is an impossibility.
because all growth. or aggregation of materials. automatically creates for each
of the constituent parts unlike time and space conditions. which in turn control
further crowth and differentiation. The unlike conditions thus created. tend to
form parallel, or concentric. isogeminal and isomorphic shells and zones, the re-
sulting form, mode of growth. and action of the constituent parts being the visible
expression of the local conditions created by growth.

Natural selection. external environment, and heredity play no part in the
creation oi the physical and chemical framework of living things.

Is

Il. MorpoorocicaL INTERPRETATION OF THE Earry STAGES OF EMBRYONIC
GROWTH.

All metazoa may be reduced to one of two types of structure. the radiate
and the bilaterally symmetrical. These two tvpes have not arisen independently
of each other: they are genetically related. the latter being derived from the former.
The bilateral type may become secondarily asvmmeirical (certam molluscs and
atthropods:. or. by the complete suppression of one side. it may develop into a

220 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

new type of radial structure (echinoderms), without thereby destroying or com-
pletely disguising the basic élements of bilateral structure and of metamerism.

In all these varying forms, the part of the embryo that represents the ccelen-
terate ancestor is the head, and the primitive infolding, or ingrowth in the center
of the head region, represents the remnants of the ccelenterate enteron. This is the
only part of the embryo that may be properly called a gastrula. The opening of
the gastrula becomes the opening to a subsequent ingrowth, the stomodzum; or
the stomodeum is formed, as nearly as may be determined, at the point where
the gastrula infolding, or the so-called blastopore, closed.

That is, in bilaterally symmetrical, or in segmented animals, or in their deriva-
tives, the true gastrula is formed at the head end only, and the permanent mouth is
formed from it, or in its place. When a germinal ingrowth forms in the post-
cephalic region, it is not to be regarded as a blastopore, but as a telopore, or as one
of the various stages of the axial infoldings that arise as a secondary result of
apical growth.

A ccelenterate type of animal represented ini mercator projection, or as laid
down in enbryo ona large yolk sphere, would take the form of a thin circular disc,
with the nerves, sense organs, and appendages arranged in concentric and radiat-
ing lines around a central, enteric infolding, or ingrowth. (Fig. 119, A.B.)

In the arachnid embryo, the ccelenterate stage is represented by the circular
germinal disc, with its central infolding. (Figs. 123-124.) This disc becomes
a part of the head, or procephalic lobes of the future embryo, while the trunk is an
outgrowth from its posterior margin.

In the later stages, we may recognize the remnants of the primitive, radiate
nervous system, in the system of radiating and concentric nerves formed from the
walls of the stomodeum. If we evert the stomodeum, and project it with its
nerves on the central area of the germ disc, where it originally belonged, the
radiate arrangement of the stomodeal nerves is apparent. (Fig. 35.)

In vertebrates, a part of the stomodeal ring is still recognizable in the cere-
bellar commissure and the side walls of the diencephalon, while the location of the
blastopore, and of the invertebrate stomodzum is indicated by the infundibular
perforation of the brain floor, and by the pit-like infolding in the center of the
procephalic lobes during the open medullary plate stage. (Figs. 25, st, 46, sé.co.)
During the gastrula stage of the metaccelenterates, therefore, the primitive mouth,
or blastopore, is surrounded by a closed nerve ring like that of their coelenterate
prototype. On this interpretation, the union of the margins of the germinal disc
represents the closing of a yolk navel on the hemal surface, not the concrescence
of the blastopore on the neural surface. Such a concrescence of the blastopore is
only conceivable on the untenable assumption that the yolk sphere completely
fills the gastrula mouth, and that the neural surface of segmented animals repre-
sents the aboral or hemal surface of a coelenterate.

Wherever yolk is present in small amounts in the egg, it may be held within
the endoderm cells. But if it is very voluminous it forms an inert, extra-cellular

INTERPRETATION OF THE EARLY STAGES. 221

mass, over which the cells spread in all directions from an initial center that always
represents the beginning of the oral or neural surface. Around this center, the
various organs are arranged in a definite order, from the center outward.

Embryonic growth on a yolk sphere, therefore, always begins near, or
centers in, the primitive oral region and spreads from it toward the aboral surface.

lf there is but little yolk present, the aboral surface may be formed during
cleavage, and at practically the same time as the oral surface. But in proportion
as the yolk increases in volume the formation of the aboral surface is delayed,
because it can only be completed by the growth of the margins of the germinal
disc around the yolk.

Thus growth on the oral and growth on the aboral surface of the embryo are
totally distinct processes, and always take place under different conditions and
in opposite directions. On one side it is centrifugal, on the other centripetal.
The uncovered yolk mass, or yolk navel, always lies on the opposite side of the
egg from the blastopore and the germinal axis.

The subject of apical and bilateral growth, or of radial and bilateral symmetry
has more than a purely academic interest for us, because the interpretation of bilat-
eral animals in terms of radiate ones, is the key to the problems of germ layers,
gastrulation, and concrescence, throughout the entire series of segmented animals.
The conditions creating bilateral symmetry and metamerism are so fundamental,
that it is hardly conceivable they could be otherwise than they are. There is no
reason whatever to doubt that the fundamental relations of the nervous axis,
blastopore, primitive mouth, and yolk sphere, and the main axes of differential
growth are the same in ccelenterates and in all bilateral acrogenous animals.

The axes of growth and of differentiation are the most important means of
orientation, and should be carefully considered in all attempts to compare ‘one
great group of animals with another.

Gaskell, Herrick, and others fail to recognize these fundamental relations.
Gaskell maintains that the “ventral” or neural side of an arthropod is the
same as the hemal or “ventral” side of a vertebrate, and that the vertebrate nerve
cords represent those of an arthropod, transferred from the “ventral” side of the
one to the “dorsal” side of the other. There are only two possible ways in which
such a transfer could take place. One way would be for them to migrate over
the surface of the yolk, right and left, uniting on the opposite side. In this case,
among other equally obvious difficulties, the original lateral margins of the cords
would be united in the median line, all the ectodermic territory, originally covered
by, and giving rise to the peripheral nerves and sense organs, would be extinguished;
and the outgrowing peripheral nerves would be directed into the canalis centralis,
with no visible means of escape. The second possible way would be for the cords
to migrate bodily through the yolk, in which case they would reach the opposite
side inside out, or upside down; that is, with the proliferating nuclear surface on
the deeper face of the cords, instead of the outermost surface as it actually is. In
order to meet the demands of his theory, Gaskell turns the arthropod embryo

222 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

inside out and upside down, and reverses its axes of growth and of specialization.

Gaskell entered the field of embryology as a novice, and at once became
hopelessly confused by the conflicting usage of the terms “dorsal” and “ventral,”
and he still remains so, because he did not establish a fixed basis for orientation.
The result is familiar enough. In spite of the testimony of his own senses, all
his rivers persist in flowing up hill, and the north pole of his compass points due
south.

Gaskell at least makes a valiant fight to save the pieces of the invertebrate
nervous system, even if he does annihilate the rest of the animal in the attempt.
Prof. C. J. Herrick’s effort is not as praiseworthy, since he discards altogether a
“perfectly good” nervous system, and substitutes for it a new one created out of
empty space.

III. Earty Staces oF LIMULUS.

The development of Limulus will serve as a convenient basis for a comparative
study of the embryology of vertebrates and arachnids. I have given little atten-
tion to the maturation, fertilization, and cleavage, devoting most of my time to
the general form of the body at successive stages, and to the method of growth of
the various organs.

Observations were made on the living eggs during the cleavage and gastrula
stages. But most of the drawings, up to the appearance of the appendages,
were made from eggs hardened in picro-nitric, or Perenys fluid, and viewed as
opaque objects, after removing the membranes. The older stages were drawn
from embryos that had been stained in various ways, and cleared in cedar oil or
balsam.

The earlier stages were most conveniently obtained by artificial fertilization;
the later stages were obtained from the nests in the sandy beaches of Woods Hole,
where, in 1893-94, most of the embryological work on Limulus was done.

In artificial fertilization, the female is opened and the eggs poured into a
shallow glass dish. By carefully tilting from side to side, the ripe eggs may be
made to adhere to the bottom and sides in a compact single layer. After a few
minutes they may be rinsed off in fresh sea water, removing the clotted blood and
immature eggs, and then fertilized.

The eggs in some crabs are a dull slate color, in others pink or buff, or of
various intermediate shades. When first taken from the body, they are shriveled
and distorted, but after a short time in sea water, they become plump and round.

During the first thirty-six hours after fertilization, their form and appearance
change rapidly. At eighteen hours, most of them appeared to segment into two
unequal blastomeres. (Fig. 122, a.) About two hours later, they again assumed
a regular outline, some of them meantime showing on the upper surface a radiate
appearance which soon disappeared. (Fig. 122, 0.)

EARLY STAGES OF LIMULUS. 223

1. Cleaveage.

About forty-eight hours after fertilization, broad furrows, filled with small
spherical bodies, appear on the upper surface of the egg. There is no regularity
in the direction of these cleavage planes, or in the form of the blastomeres,
although a four cell stage resembling that of many amphibia, is frequently seen.
(Fig. 126, ¢.)

Cleavage is most marked on the surface that happens to be uppermost.
Eggs with ten or twelve prominent blastomeres on the upper surface may be per-
fectly smooth and apparently unsegmented on the under side. However, when
stripped off the glass and inverted, segmentation appears on the smooth under
surface in about fifteen minutes, and in half an hour it may be almost as
complete as it was on the original upper surface.

There, is however, a distinct polarity to the egg that is not influenced by its
position, for cleavage ultimately makes greater progress on that side of the egg

Fic. 122.—Cleavage stages, and yolk navel, h, of Limulus eggs.

that is to become the neural surface, irrespective of whether it faces up or down.
On the fourth or fifth day, most of the eggs are covered with a single layered
blastoderm on one side, while the opposite side was still occupied by large yolk
spheres.

In many cases, the blastoderm, spreads over the opposite side of the egg in an
advancing fold, the uncovered yolk either protruding from the opening, or lying
a little below the general surface. The uncovered area is usually circular, but it
may be quite irregular, and varies in size from an opening one-third the diameter
of the egg to that ofa pinhole. (Fig. 126,h.) The yolk plug thus produced has
nothing to do with the formation of germ layers. It resembles the condition seen
in the early stages of certain ganoids, cyclostomes, and other fishes, but it has
no parallel, to my knowledge, in the invertebrates.

On the eighth day, a single layered blastoderm covers the entire egg, enclosing
numerous nucleated yolk spheres.

Comparison of Arachnids and Vertebrates.—The cleavage in the arach-

224 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

nids presents an interesting intermediate series of stages between the typical cen-
trolicithal type of insects and that of the lower vertebrates.

In Limulus, there is a distinct approach toward the partial cleavage of the
amphibia and cyclostomes. In Telyphonus (Schimkewitsch), the form of the
blastomeres, and the size and location of the resulting segmentation cavity are
very similar to the corresponding structures in the frog’s eggs.

In the scorpion, which possesses one of the largest eggs among the arthropods,
all the early divisions take place on the surface of the yolk (Brauer), producing
a typical meroblastic cleavage, and a small sharply defined blastodisc very similar
to that in the teleosts.

In many insects and spiders, the early divisions take place in the interior of

Fic. 123.—A, Surface view of the blastoderm and primitive cumulus of Limulus, showing the beginning of
gastrulation, a.c., and the formation of the primitive germinal area, ».b.1; B, later stage showing the increasing
number of inner layer cells that mark the boundaries of the germinal area, and the formation of the posterior
cumulus, p.c., that marks the beginning of the trunk, and of teloblastic, or apical, growth.

the egg, and all the nuclei thus produced may move to the surface to form the
blastoderm, from which yolk cells and mesentoderm cells arise by a subsequent
process of division and ingrowth. But in some insects and arachnids, cleavage
nuclei remain in the interior of the egg as the so-called yolk nuclei, which, as a
rule do not give rise to the definitive endoderm. In Limulus, the condition appears
to be exceptional, in that most of the yolk cells derived from the early cleavage
nuclei, persist as the permanent lining of the midgut and its diverticula.
Although accessions are subsequently made to the yolk nuclei by the ingrowth
of cells from the germinal disc and germ wall, no definite bands of columnar
endoderm cells, such as those seen in insects and crustacea, are formed.

On the whole, the cleavage seen in the arachnids (Limulus and the scorpion)
is very similar to that of primitive vertebrates, and affords us a satisfactory basis
for the interpretation of the later stages of development in the arthropod and
vertebrate stock.

2. The Germ Disc or Primitive Cumulus.

The embryo first appears about four and a half days after fertilization, as
a very faint, white, germinal spot. Later, it may be a minute, roughened papilla,

THE GERM DISC OR PRIMITIVE CUMULUS. 225

partly surrounded by a shallow groove, and situated in the center of a flat germ
disc.

Early in the fifth day, the germ disc forms a prominent, mound-like elevation,
or cumulus, with the germinal spot now forming a crater-like depression at its
summit. (Fig. 124, A’.A’’.) In sections, the cumulus appears as a thickening of
the blastoderm, with scattering cells arising from the whole of its inner surface,
and with a cloud of cells migrating from the central depression, or gastrula,
into the yolk.

. SESS PS
7 a
RB"
i" ac

pol

we

“pe “7p
3
A

poll.

——" 2

Fic. 124.—Limulus embryos, seen as opaque objects, in surface views and in profile. The figures show the
primitive cumulus, the expanding germinal area, and the beginning of the separation into head and trunk.

3. Formation of Metameres.

On the sixth and seventh days, the first traces of metamerism appear. Some
of the events that take place at this time are difficult to observe. They are best
seen by selecting the most conspicuously marked eggs and examining them by
reflected light.

In stained, surface views of the germinal area, large nuclei may be seen on
its margin, sometimes arranged in pairs, two nuclei on the right, two on the left,
and one or more on the anterior margin. (Fig. 123, A.pb.l.) These nuclei
appear to initiate the formation of the germwall and the periblast, or marginal
yolk cells. In later stages, the inner and outer cell layers become a little thicker
or darker, over the anterior half of the germinal area, and two germinal spots are
now visible, an anterior and a posterior one. (Fig. 123, B.,a.c. and p.c.)

When studied as opaque objects, an earlier stage of the germinal area than

q5

226 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

the one just described has the appearance shown in Fig. 124, A’. A shallow
groove subsequently divides the cumulus into a darker anterior, and a lighter
posterior part (Fig. 124, A®.); and finally a faint depression appears on the right
and left, and on the anterior and posterior margins of the cumulus. A®.

In still older specimens, the anterior half of the previous cumulus now appears
as a faint, wave-like ridge, in front of the reformed cumulus; the ridge repre-
senting the forehead, or procephalic lobes. B?., pr.c. On the anterior half of the

ar 7

° prc.

eones PTC.
see:
ers
2
eee 7 ih ced: of “ae
1 -p.c. ,e
C. ne.
Cc. — Bic eel
we ee
I. x
we : cities pol.
os c
eB Ss st s>?
Sere Y sé
3?
a | ap | ig
D “eS aa “Pats | hp

Fic, 125.—Limulus embryos, seen as opaque objects, showing the formation of the first six thoracic metameres,
and the gradual infolding of the proliferating cells in the posterior cumulus to form a primitive streak, or telopore.

cumulus, is the beginning of the second thoracic metamere, s*; the posterior
germinal spot marks the beginning of the telopore, f.c. The anterior germinal
spot lies between the procephalon and the second metamere, a.c.
In a short time, the posterior half of the primitive cumulus rounds out into

a new cumulus with a germinal depression on its posterior side B* and B*. The
remaining thoracic metameres are formed in a similar manner, by successive,
wave-like elevations, on the anterior slope of the terminal cumulus, or anal plate.
(Fig. 125.)

' The second, third, and fourth thoracic metameres form in regular order, and
are of about equal proportions. ‘There is then a distinct pause, followed by the
appearance of the fifth and sixth metameres. (Fig. 125, D*.)

THE FORMATION OF METAMERES. 227

The more posterior thoracic metameres are cut off from the anterior margin
of the anal plate, as rather narrow bands or ridges, s° and s°. Later their pe-
ripheral ends join the germ wall and spread rapidly in a lateral direction. The
cheliceral metamere, s’, appears at a relatively late period between the cephalic
lobes and the second thoracic metamere. (Fig. 125, D’.)

The sequence in the development of the abdominal metameres is similar to
that of the thoracic. First, the operculum and first gill appear, then a pause,
followed by the remaining gills in order. Finally the chilaria appear at a late
period in front of the operculum. (Figs. 141, 142.)

126

Fics. 126 aND 127.—Diagrams to illustrate the methods of cleavage, gastrulation, and the growth of the germ layers
and the cephalic navel in a yolkless egg, and one with yolk. The yolk is shown in black.

The further growth of the metameres and appendages is shown by the figures
and need not be described in detail. We would, however, call attention to the
fact that there is a period when the second, third, and fourth thoracic metameres
are especially conspicuous, and the appendages first to appear are formed on these
metameres. (Fig. 140.) During this period, the fifth and sixth metameres and
the whole abdominal region may be deeply depressed, sometimes forming a deep
infolding, on the floor of which the abdominal appendages are developed. All
the thoracic appendages have appeared by the tenth or eleventh day.

4. The Gastrula.

Returning to stage A. We have seen that two distinct median germinal
spots appear near the summit of the primitive cumulus.

The anterior one (Figs. 123 and 124, a.c.) comes to lie near the center of the
future procephalic lobes. It soon disappears from surface views, but remains
visible in sections as a mass of “‘yolk cells,’128 D*. a.c._ It augments by division,
and by the migration of new cells from the surface, up to stage G and H, when
under favorable conditions it may be seen even in surface views, as a deep lying
cloud of cells, now showing the peculiar histological characters of degeneration.
(Fig. 140, G.a.c.)

228 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

The stomodeum appears shortly after stage E, on the anterior margin of the
procephalic lobes, its inner end coming to lie in the midst of this cloud of degen-
erating nuclei. (Fig. 140,G.) After stage J, no trace of these yolk nuclei is visible.

I have pointed out that a similar condition exists in Acilius and other insects,
and that it is probably characteristic of arthropods in general. This infolding is
the only one in arthropods that, in respect to the time of its appearance, its loca-
tion, and its products, can be regarded as a gastrula, and we shall designate it as
such.

5. The Germ Wall.

The germ wall is a narrow, unsegmented zone of proliferating cells, first seen
along the margins of the germinal disc, and later along the sides of the embryo up
to the last stage in the closing of the hemal surface, g.w.

The pairs of large nuclei in stage A (Fig. 123, p.6l.), located on the margins
of the germinal area, mark the beginnings of the germ wall and of the periblast.

Ae ete
“agents:
£8535,

°
z

88

Fic. 128.—Sections of the germinal area of Limulus in stage D, showing the formation of the inner layers,
and the extension of the germinal area by the growth of the germ wall, g.w., over the surface of the yolk. The
local inward proliferation of the blastoderm to form, in part, the mesoblastic somites, is shown at a.; m., median
line. Sections D@ and De from the procephalic, and anterior thoracic, regions. Section Dd. from the region
of the primitive streak, pr.s,

At these points an inward proliferation develops, in surface views appearing as
faint spots or depressions; later they form a conspicuous marginal band or thick-
ening. (Figs. 125, 128, 140, g.w.)

The inward proliferation along this margin is similar to that at the apex of
the body. As the germinal margin spreads over the surface of the yolk, it leaves
behind a trail of differentiated ectoderm, mesoderm, and yolk cells, or periblast.
It ceases to produce new periblast after stage J, but it continues to proliferate the
definitive ectoderm and new ectoderm, probably up to the time the cephalic navel
closes.

THE GERM WALL. 229

On either side of the germ wall there is a sharp distinction between the defini-
tive ectoderm and mesoderm on the one hand, and the single layer of columnar
blastoderm cells on the other. (Fig. 129.)

* * * * * * * * *

It thus appears that in Limulus the formation of germ layers is not a
particular event in the development. It takes place at different times and
in widely different parts of the germinal area. In fact, the production of
germ layers may occur wherever early growth takes place, as for example,
on the sides of the anal plate, where the mesoblastic somites are formed; in the
germ wall, where the germ layers in the lateral ends of each half metamere are

"ey
er,

Weecsy 120

Fic. 129.—Section through the primitive streak of Limulus, stage G, showing mesoblastic somites, germ wall,
periblast, etc.

Fic. 130.—Sections of same stage through posterior parts of the anal plate.

formed; in the telopore, where the axial tissues arise; or in the comparatively
late stages of development, where mesodermic tissues appear to arise from various
local modifications of the ectoderm. ‘The formation of germ layers is not, there-
fore, synonymous with gastrulation, nor is it to be regarded as a modification of
gastrulation, which, as we understand it, is that particular process by which an
organ representing the enteron of a ccelenterate was formed; as for example, the
central ingrowth of the primitive cumulus, and of the procephalic lobes. The
formation of the germ layers from the telopore and germ walls, is ontogenetically
and phylogenetically a later and a different process. It is the embryonic method
of growing a new body on an old head, the head representing the ancestral ccelen-
terate body. Neither the embryonic method of postcephalic growth in segmented
animals, nor the great variety of tissues and organs produced by it, are comparable
with anything that takes place in the ccelenterate.

230 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

6. The Mesoderm.

The Sources and Kinds of Mesoderm.

We may distinguish four sources from which the mesoderm takes its origin,
viz: a. the procephalic mesoderm, arising by delamination from the anterior
portion of the primitive cumulus; 6. the axial mesoderm (primitive streak) from
the axial teloblasts; c. the mesoblastic somites, from the sides of the anal plate;
and d. the lateral plates, from the germ wall.

a. Procephalic mesoderm. In the procephalon the mesoderm forms a
single unpaired, thin-walled chamber, approximately coextensive with the cephalic
lobes. It arises by delamination from the anterior half of the primitive cumulus;
it is not divided into an axial cord, somites, and lateral plates, and does not
appear to be comparable with that in the trunk. (Fig. 123, B.) It disappears
without giving rise to any permanent organ or tissue, except the investment of the
stomodzum and forebrain.

b. The postoral mesoderm consists of the axial cord, somites and lateral
plates. These three subdivisions are present in the whole postoral region or
trunk, but they may be very unequally developed. A striking feature in the
arachnids and vertebrates is the large size of the somites of the midbrain region,
and the atrophy of the corresponding lateral plates.

1. The axial cord arises from successive proliferations, located in the median
line at the posterior end of the body. After the first one or two segments are
formed, an unsegmented, axial cord appears, extending forward from the center
of the anal plate to the stomodeum. Its presence is indicated, either by a faint,
median shadow (Fig. 125, C.p.c.), or by a groove, or “primitive streak” (Fig. 128,
D®. pr.s.), or by a sharp depression, or telopore. (Fig. 140, ¢.p.)

The axial cord gradually breaks up, from before backward, into a. the
ectodermic middle cord, from which arises the median nerve and the epithelium
of the canalis centralis; b. into the mesodermic lemmatochord, or notochord; and
c. into the primary germ cells. (See notochord.)

The axial mesoderm shows little or no trace of segmentation and never con-
tains a ccelomic cavity.

2. The Somites—The thoracic and abdominal metameres are formed as
paired, wave-like ridges on the anterior lateral margin of the posterior cumulus,
or of the anal plate. At the same time, a band of mesoderm cells separates from
the inner surface of each ridge, giving rise to a pair of mesodermic segments. which,
as fast as they separate from the outer cell layer, form hollow, thick-walled somites.
In the later stages, the posterior abdominal somites arise as segments of the wing-
like expansions of mesoderm formed beneath the ectoderm, on either side of the
telopore. (Fig. 130.)

From the somites arise the longitudinal muscles and cartilages of the append-
ages, the endocranium, the genital and nephric ducts, and the nephric tissue.

THE MESODERM. 231

3. The Lateral Plates.—The lateral end of each primitive somite retains its
connection with the proliferating surface cells that constitute the germ wall. As
the germ wall spreads over the yolk, it gives rise to the lateral plates, or that part
of the mesodermic segments lying lateral to the zone of appendages. ‘The lateral
plates are merely lateral extensions of the somites, and like them each one con-
sists of somatic and splanchnic layers, and may enclose a ccelomic cavity. The
somite is the product of the apical growth of the anal plate; the lateral plates
are produced by the lateral extension
of the germ wall. The peripheral
margins of the lateral plates finally
lose their connection with the germ
wall, and the cell layers separating
adjoining coelomic cavities break down.

From the lateral plates arise the
extra embryonic blood corpuscles,
the cardiomeres, pericardial chamber,
and the longitudinal, hemal muscles.

Lateral Plates in the Frog —The
mesoderm forming the segmented
lateral plates of the post-thoracic

Fro. 131. Fig. 132.

Fic. 131.—Section through the fourth segmental sense organ, s.o.', of the thorax of an embryo Limulus, about
stage I, together with the adjacent margin of the germ wall with its mass of fiber cells, f.c.; a. to i., fiber cells
of the same stage more highly magnified; d.e.f., similar cells from the adult, in a free amoeboid condition, and in
fission; g., same sense organ with its lens-like chitenous thickening during the trilobite stage.

Fic. 132.—Clusters of fiber cells from the posterior, hamal region of the thorax, about stage N, showing
mode of division and their transformation into muscles. Limulus

metameres plays such an important part in the development of the arthropod
embryos, that one might reasonably expect to find some trace of them in verte-
brates. With this object in view, specially prepared frogs’ eggs were studied in
a strong oblique light. In this work I was aided by Mr. A. O. Kelley, a grad-
uate student at Dartmouth, and the figures and descriptions on this point were
worked out by us together, in 1906-07.

A considerable number show two or three pairs of lateral plates; a very

232 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

few show a larger number, as in Fig. 159. In this specimen, the anterior
plates, which apparently belong to the post-branchial metameres, are directed
downward and forward as if they were growing around the egg below the gill
plates, just as the post-vagal segments of the arachnids encircle the egg on the
hemal side of the appendicular arches. (Figs. 17, 19.) The segments decrease
in length caudad, and the most posterior ones are directed downward and back-
ward toward the closing telopore, forming a distinct welt on either side.

The lateral plates quickly disappear, so that it was not possible to follow them
into later stages.

Although these results are very meager, it nevertheless seems probable that
the figures in question are to be regarded as a faint recurrence of the concrescing
segmented lateral plates of mesoderm so conspicuous in the arachnids.

The Fiber Cells.—One of the chief products of the germ wall is a thick band
of rounded or oval cells, that we shall call fiber cells. They lie in the first five
thoracic segments in an intermediate zone median to the germ wall. They have
a remarkable structure and history; some give rise to definite muscles; some
persist in the adult as a peculiar type of spindle shaped semi amceboid cells re-
sembling blood corpuscless; others, after forming muscles, degenerate during the
later embryonic and larval stages.

In the earlier stages, the fiber cells cannot be distinguished from the other
cells in the germ wall. (Figs. 128 and 129.) In stages J and K, they form a
broad, thick band of large oval cells, rather loosely arranged, and presenting a
very striking appearance. (Fig. 131, A.f.c.) Each cell contains a small eccentric
nucleus and a highly refractive, colorless fiber. The latter may run in a regular
spiral direction, filling the entire cell, or it may form regular loops arranged in
compact bundles that stand at various angles with each other; a, b, h and c.
Aside from the fiber, the cells appear empty and colorless, although in some
cases they may have a dense, slightly colored envelop, f and d.

In stage G, the fiber cells are clearly visible in surface views as a dark inner
border to the germ wall, and extending from the cheliceral segment, where it
is especially enlarged, to the anterior border of the sixth segment. (Figs. 141-
144, a.v.)

The band increases in width and continues to advance toward the hemal
surface. In stage H, it forms an equatorial girdle, the two extremes having
meantime united behind, and almost united in front. (Figs. 141 and 144, @.v.)
After it passes the equator the posterior limb moves rapidly forward, swinging
into a hemo-neural direction, thus shifting the center of the closing ring toward
the anterior hemal portion of the thorax. (Figs. 147 to 149.)

Meantime the yolk mass of the thorax, and a little later that of the abdomen,
divides into distinct lobes, the future enteric pouches. Important agents in bring-
ing this about are the heemo-neural muscles of the thorax. There are eleven pairs
of these muscles attached to the middle of the dorsal shield in the adult, making
five pairs of complicated markings on its inner surface. (Fig. 155.) Six pairs

THE FIBER CELLS. 233

of tergo-plastrals arise from the endocranium, and five pairs of tergo-coxals
from the coxal joints of each thoracic appendage, two in front and three behind.
These muscles and the spaces between the developing gut lobes are important
conduction paths for the distribution of the fiber cells.

The muscles arise at a very early period from the anterior and from the poster-
ior wall of each mesodermic segment, close to the somites. They form the only
suggestion of segmentation that is to be seen in the lateral plate area of the thorax.
(Figs. 142-151, hm.m* >.)

At first the tergo-coxal muscles lie in a nearly horizontal plane, their median
or neural ends attached to the ectoderm between the bases of the thoracic ap-
pendages. (Fig. 142.) Their lateral ends gradually advance with the germ
wall toward the hemal surface, and as they swing into a nearly vertical position,
they cut the thoracic yolk mass into five great lobes, which ultimately become the
five main liver lobes, or enteric pouches, of the thorax. (Figs. 142-151,
hn.m *%.)

In stages K and L, the fiber cells begin to scatter in different directions.
Many leave the surface and penetrate the interior of the thorax, following, in the
main, the channels between the yolk lobes formed by the hemo-neural muscles.

During stage L, embryos seen from the hemal surface show the fiber cells
as two large mottled patches on the anterior lateral surface of the thorax. (Fig.
149, @.v.) The clear oval area between them represents the cephalic navel, or the
depression where the remnant of the blastoderm is passing into the interior of the
yolk.

The fiber cells congregate in great numbers along the sides of the cephalic
navel, and around the hemal ends of the first five pairs of hemo-neural muscles,
where they form dark colored, conical or wedge-shaped masses of cells. (Figs.
146-149, hn.m *>.)

It will be observed that up to the present time the fiber cells have a very
definite distribution, and except for a few scattering clusters they are absent
from the sixth thoracic, the vagus, and the abdominal segments. (Figs. 148 and
149.)

The metamorphosis of some of these loose oval fiber cells into muscles is
very rapid and takes place a little after stage M@, when the embryo is taking on the
trilobite form, and pigment has appeared in the eyes. At this period, the cells
stain more readily; the fiber is less distinct, forming finer parallel fibrils; the nucleus
takes up a central position; and the cells elongate somewhat and unite end to end
in irregular rows. (Fig. 132.) In the more advanced stages, a central canal
has formed, in which the dividing nuclei are arranged in a single row and the
beginning of cross striations is seen on the free, more or less pointed ends of the
cells.

Two great masses of these muscle cells are formed on either side of the ceph-
alic navel and of the anterior end of the heart. From them are developed two
pairs of muscles. One pair, the inter-tergals, lies on either side of the heart,

234 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

gpote
uae

Fic. 133.—Diagrams, in mercator projection, illustrating the mode of growth of arachnid embryos during the
early stages; A, primitive cumulus, in the radiate or gastrula stages; B, appearance of the posterior cumulus and the
teloblasts, or the beginning of apical growth and the differentiation of the primitive head and trunk; C, appearance of
the medullary plate; the procephalic lobes; the marginal sense organs and ganglia; the telopore; and the segmenta-
tion, and lateral expansion, of the posterior portion of the germinal area; D, appearance of the thoracic appen-
dages; the growth of the palium over the procephalic lobes; the post-anal concrescence of the lateral plates of the
germinal area; and the forward extension of the vagal and anterior abdominal plates.

gn. neh. Co. NEG
sR ee ae (eee

Fie. 134. Fie. 135.
Fic. 134.—Schematic cross-section of an arachnid embryo in the anterior thoracic region, showing the
relative positions and the mode of growth of the principal organs.
Fic. 135.—Schematic figure, in mercator projection, showing further concrescence of the germ wall, in a
hypothetical, large yolked embryo. Thecephalic navel appears just in front of the procephalon, as the anlage of
the hzemastoma, and the anterior appendicular arches are beginning to close in the hemal surface of the procephalon.

Fic. 136.—Section of a later stage Fic, 137.—Section of a still later stage
in the same region. in the branchial region.

THE FIBER CELLS. 235

At the time of hatching, it is very voluminous, and is apparently confined to the
thorax. (Fig. 151, i.t.) In the later stages, it undergoes considerable reduction,
and its posterior end becomes attached to the anterior margin of the abdominal
shield. (Fig. 77, im.t.)

The other large muscle developed from the fiber cells is the anterior end
of the hypobranchial. (Fig. 77, B.b.th.m.) This muscle also becomes greatly
reduced in volume in the older stages, and its anterior end retreats to a more
posterior position.

Many other fiber cells become scattered irregularly along the margins of the
thoracic shield, in the spaces left free by the contracting liver lobes. Here they
elongate and form the small, scattered bundles of muscle fibers that permanently
unite the neural and hemal walls of the cephalic buckler.

The metamorphosis of fiber cells into these particular muscles on the hemal
surface of the thorax, takes place at a very late period, long after the endocranium,
the hemo-neural, and other muscles have become clearly differentiated; and
no other muscles than those mentioned are formed in this manner. At the
time the fiber cells undergo their metamorphosis, the yolk lobes are invested with
a thin cellular layer, so that it is hardly probable that any of them are absorbed in
the yolk with the hemal blastoderm.

A large number of fiber cells, however, never form definite muscles. They
persist through life, loosely distributed throughout the lacuna spaces in all parts
of the body, although they appear to be more numerous at the base of the append-
ages and in the anterior portions of the cephalic shield.

In the half grown Limuli, and even in the adult, they may be readily recognized
by their large size, peculiar structure, and coloring. They generally preserve
the spindle-shaped form, but appear to be somewhat amceboid, or rather euglenoid,
and some have been observed in division. (Fig. 131, e.) The fiber is now
much less refractive and has lost its distinctly spiral arrangement, apprearing as
longitudinal strie that converge toward either end.

The remarkable history of the fiber cells indicates that they are the degenerat-
ing remnants of the longitudinal hemal muscles of the first five thoracic segments.
Only a part of the large number of cells actually form muscles; the others become
free cells that may be regarded as a special type of blood corpuscle, although they
do not appear to circulate freely in the main blood channels.

In the spiders and in the scorpion, the same kind of fiber cells are present.
Juts what their history is in these forms has not been definitely determined. Vari-
ous authors, who have apparently seen them in the spiders, state that they give
rise to blood corpuscles.

Whether these cells ultimately give rise to true blood corpuscles or not
was not determined.

Blood corpuscles of the usual type arise from the peripheral ends of the lateral
plates of the thoracic and abdominal segments, and at these early stages can be
readily distinguished from the fiber cells. (Fig. 131, 0.c.)

236 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

Assheton! has described some peculiar wandering cells, of unknown fate and
significance, that appear in many parts of the body on the sixth and seventh days
of incubation in Gymnarchus nitolicus, p. 369-370. In their distribution, size,
“peculiar refrangent qualities” and in the “ribs which run from pole to pole,”

vty

Fic. 138.—Schematic diagrams in mercator projection, at two different stages illustrating the arrangement and
mode of growth of the mesoderm and its derivatives in an arachnid embryo.

they greatly resemble the fiber cells of the arachnids and I have no doubt they
are in reality the same kind of cells.

Similar cells have also been described by Plehn, 1906, in teleosts. They are
oval, thick-walled cells with a small excentric nucleus and with numerous fine,
highly refractive, unstainable rods or threads, all converging toward the non-

Fic. 139.—Schematic figures of the hamal surface of arthropod and vertebrate embryos, to illustrate the
method ot closing the hemal surface in large yolked embryos. A, Insect type, with elongated cephalic navel;
B, arachnid type with larger yolk sphere and overhanging or projecting cephalic and caudal lobes; C, vertebrate
type, with a relatively larger, more posteriorly located, yolk sphere; with cephalic appendages concrescing around
the cephalic navel; and with delayed concrescence of the centrally located cardiomeres, thus giving rise to the
bifurcated heart tube, and to the middle, or belly, navel.

nucleated pole of the cell. They are widely distributed in the walls of blood ves-
sels and in lymphoid tissue, and are said to form a secretion that is probably
emptied into the blood. See also Phoronis and Lernea, p. 447.

Vascular Area.—From the preceding descriptions it will be seen that an ex-
tra-embryonic area is established in the arachnids in which we may recognize the

1The Development of Gymnarchus Niloticus. The work of John Samuel Budget, Cambridge, 1907.

THE VASCULAR AREA. 237

beginnings of a vascular area, a pelucid area, and a germ wall, having a structure,
arrangement, and mode of growth similar to the corresponding ones in the
vertebrates.

A comparison of the numerous sections given by S. Mollier to illustrate the
development of the blood will show that the structure and mode of growth of the
vascular cords in amphibians and cyclostomes are essentially the same as in
Limulus.

The principal difference in our descriptions relates to the origin of the cells
in or near the germ wall. Many students of vertebrate embryology state that
yolk cells migrate into the germ wall and give rise to blood cells. In Limulus,
according to my description, while it is true that many cells originating in the germ
wall pass out of it into the yolk, there is no indication that the yolk cells migrate
in the opposite direction into the vascular cell cord. As the pictures presented
by the vascular cell cords in vertebrates and arachnids are identical, the difference
undoubtedly lies in the interpretations, not in the processes.

It will be seen from an inspection of the diagrams illustrating these conditions
in mercator projection, that along the periphery of the germinal area in typical
arachnids such as the scorpion, the spiders, and Limulus, there is a zone of dividing
cells that constitutes one of the earliest and most important sources of blood cor-
puscles. (Fig. 138, av.) It may therefore be called the vascular area. Owing
to the forward growth of the abdominal lateral plates and the absence of such
plates in the thoracic region, a barren extra embryonic area is formed around the
head, which may be regarded as the beginning of a pellucid area. (Fig. 138,
B. a.pl.)

It will be seen that when the same conditions are shown from the hemal sur-
face of the egg (Fig. 139, A,B.), the concrescing germ walls form a median band
or cord of yolk cells, heart cells, and blood cells, extending from the posterior
margin of the dorsal organ, or cephalic navel, to the caudal navel.

In the vertebrates, we may recognize a modification of this condition, due
largely to the increase in the size of the yolk sphere. (Fig. 139,C.) When the
latter is of considerable size, the heemal concrescence of the germ wall, in the
middle sections of the body, is delayed, or does not take place at all. Thus a
potential, or real, belly navel is formed, dividing the primitive vascular cord into
three sections. The definitive heart arises from the anterior section that lies
between the cephalic navel, or mouth, and the belly navel. In the middle section,
the vessel remains in a paired condition, forming around the navel a vascular
ring, the anterior part of which represents the Cuvierian ducts, or the proximal
ends of the vitelline veins. The posterior ends unite behind the belly navel to
form the posterior section of the primitive vascular cord, which is continuous, at
its posterior end, with the hemal lip of the blastopore, or caudal navel. From
the posterior section is formed the unpaired vitelline vein, which represents the
non-contractile caudal end of the arachnid hemal vessel. (Compare also Figs.

17, 23, 31, 34, 43-)

238 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

IV. Tue CepHatic NaveL, Dorsat OrcaAN, OR NEOSTOMA.

Limulus.—During the primitive cumulus stage, the blastoderm outside the
germinal area consists of a single layer of sharply defined cells. At this period,

Fic. 140.—Limulus embryos in stage F and stage G, the latter in mercator projection. The lateral plates of the
sixth thoracic and anterior abdominal metameres, and the segmental sense organs, are clearly shown.

Fic. r41.—Same, stage H, mercator projection. The first five thoracic metameres and the procephalic lobes have no
segmented lateral plates.

the “vicarious chorion,” a thick membrane secreted by the superficial cells of the
eggs, is smooth and structureless over the germinal area, but over the blastoderm
it is divided into polygonal plates, one for each blastoderm cell. (Fig. 128, v.c.)

THE CEPHALIC NAVEL. 239

The membrane soon separates from the embryo, and later from the blasto-
derm. The blastoderm cells meantime become very deep and columnar, the
nuclei and dense cytoplasm collecting at their outer, and numerous yolk par-
ticles, at their inner ends. (Fig. 129, d‘o.) At this period, the blastoderm cells
beyond the embryonic area are everywhere sharply cut off from the yolk, and there
is no migration of cells from one to the other.

In stage G (Fig. 143), the blastodermic nuclei, along a narrow zone just
beyond the germ wall, take on a sharper and darker color, do. During stages

Fic. 142.—Same, stage K, mercator projection. On the right, the ends of the thoracic appendages are
removed.

H and I, the zone widens, gradually spreading over the entire blastoderm. This
change in the appearance of the nuclei marks the beginning of a rapid prolifera-
tion, and subsequent degeneration of the blastoderm cells. During this process,
the chromatin collects into larger, intensely stained particles; the columnar cells
divide, take on a spherical, or oval form, and pass in great numbers into the yolk,
where they form a very conspicuous mass of loosely arranged cells. (Fig. 134, d.o.)

The cytoplasm of these cells soon becomes fainter and more transparent, and

240 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

finally disappears. The coarse irregular nuclear masses break up into very fine
granules, which become scattered through the yolk and absorbed.

Meantime, as the germ wall passes the equator of the egg and advances to-
ward the anterior hemal surface, it surrounds a gradually narrowing area, where
the degenerating blastoderm cells are being crowded into the yolk and overgrown
by the germ wall and its products. The ingrowing blastoderm, and the narrowing
ring formed by the germ wall and vascular area, constitute the cephalic navel.
(Figs. 139-149, ¢.nv.)

When the vascular area and germ walls finally close in the hemal surface,
the entire extra-embryonic blastoderm and its products have disappeared in the
interior of the egg. Owing to the shape of the yolk sphere, and to the unequal
expansion of the thoracic and abdominal lateral plates, the greater part of the
blastoderm is crowded into the anterior portion of the mesocephalon, and is last
seen disappearing into the yolk just behind the procephalon. (Figs. 149, 150,
c.nv.)

In stage O, the last remnants of these cells may be seen scattered about in the
yolk contained in the first four pairs of enteric pouches. (Fig. 151.)

Other Arthropods.—The cephalic navel of Limulus without doubt represents
one phase of the structure familiar in insects, crustacea, and myriapods, and which
is usually spoken of as the “dorsal organ.” It has only recently been recognized
in the arachnids. I have found a similar structure to that of Limulus in the
scorpion, and, according to Schimkewitsch, one is found in Pholcus and
probably in Telephonus. One has also been described in the copepods.
(Fig. 272, B.)

In the crustacea, the conditions centered in or around the cephalic navel
give rise to a variety of structures. It may be a transitory, embryonic gland-
like organ, as in isopods; a larval organ serving for temporary attachment, as in
cladocera (Figs. 8, 9); or a voluminous outgrowth that serves throughout life for
the attachment of the animal to some inanimate object, or to its host, as in cirri-
peds and parasitic copepods. (Figs. 275, 282, 283.)

The cephalic navel, in one form or another, is therefore found in all classes
of arthropods. What its original significance may be is not apparent. But its
function, when it has one, and its location and general mode of growth are
constant.

There are clearly two factors involved in its formation: r. the low pressure
area formed by the degenerating hemal blastoderm; and 2. the convergence of the
margins of the germinal area toward the center of degeneration. The invagination
of the degenerating blastoderm into the yolk, and the closure of the germinal
area around it, gave rise to a fistula-like communication between the enteron and
the exterior. This opening may close up completely during the embryonic stages,
leaving no scar behind (insects and arachnids); or around the point of closure
scar-like glandular structures or outgrowths may develop that serve as temporary
or permanent means of attachment (crustacea, cirripeds), or in parasitic forms

THE CEPHALIC NAVEL. 241

Fic. 143.—Limulus embryo, stage G. Note the segmental sense organs, and the absense of segmented thoracic
plates.
“Fic. 144.—Same, stage H. The hemal portion of the blastoderm, just beyond the germ wall, is beginning to pro-
liferate, marking the beginning of the dorsal organ, or cephalic navel, d.o.
Fic. 145.—Same, stage I. The entire hamal blastoderm is in active proliferation.
Fic. 146.—Same, stage J. The germ wall and vascular area are very conspicuous; the posterior limb of the
germ wall has moved forward to the hemal portion of the thorax, narrowing the area of the cephalic navel.
Fic. 147.—Same, stage K. The abdominal lobe is distinctly marked off; the lateral eye, l.e., has moved back-
ward into the fourth thoracic segment, and the cephalic navel is confined to the hzmal surface of the anterior
thoracic region.
Fic. 148.—Same, stage L. The full complement of branchial segments have appeared, and the margins of
th-ir lateral plates have united on the hemal surface to form the heart; the lateral eye lies hemal to the tho-
racic sense organ.

16

242 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

ae ers
putes

iy

Fic. 149.—Same, stage L, seen from the hemal surface, showing the completion of the sixth thoracic and all
the abdominal segments. Five great masses of fiber cells, surround the hemo-neural musclesh.u. m. 175, that
divide the thoracic yolk mass into five lateral lobes. ¢

Fic, 150,—Same, stage M. Two great masses of fiber cells av., and the remnants of the hzmal blastoderm, are seen
on either side of the cephalic navel, c.1v.

CONCRESCENCE. 243

as a means of absorbing nutrition. In the vertebrates, tunicates, enteropneusta,
amphioxus, and pterobranchia the cephalic fistula became a permanent opening
into the enteron, thus giving rise to a new oral opening, or hemostoma, at the
time when the old mouth was about to close up.

V. CONCRESCENCE AND THE CAUDAL NAVEL OR ‘‘ BLASTOPORE.”

We have seen that the body of segmented animals consists of an axial cord
and a right and left series of segments, or half metameres, and that the body

a
eet! q
ai a

Fic. 151.—Same. Embryo just before it escapes from the inner egg membrane, stage O. The cephalic

navel has closed and the degenerating remnants of the hemal blastoderm are seen enclosed in the first four pairs of
liver lobes, giving them a mottled appearance. The lobes are still partly filled with yolk.

grows in length by the formation of new segments at the anal plate, and in breadth
by the increase in length of the half metameres. But as each half metamere
grows older and longer its peripheral end increases in width faster than its central
end. Hence, as new segments are successively formed, the lateral margins of the
germinal area increase in length faster than the axial, and the germinal area, in-
stead of forming an elongated band of nearly uniform width, or a triangle, forms
first a heart-shaped figure, and finally one in which the peripheral margins con-
cresce in front of and behind the main axis. (Fig. 157, A.C.) When this has

244 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

Fic. 152.—Limulus larva in the trilobite stage. Hzamal surface.

Fic. 153.—Same from the neural surface, the free portions of the appendages removed.

CONCRESCENCE. 245

taken place, apical growth can no longer proceed over the surface of the yolk, it
must take place by the piling up of one segment on top of another, in the shape
of small closed rings.

Concrescence, therefore, is the inevitable result of apical and bilateral growth
over a spherical yolk surface.

The amount of concrescence in a given animal depends on the ratio of
marginal to apical growth, and upon the radius of the yolk sphere. Another
factor that materially affects the form of the embryo, is the gradual suppression
of the lateral margins of the more anterior segments.

Fic. 154.—Young Limulus, after the shedding of the trilobite shell. The segmental sense organs of the fourth
thoracic segment, and the procephalic sutures of the trilobite stage, have disappeared.

Embryonic apical growth represents the phylogenetic method of adding new
body segments to the old, but it is accomplished in a very different manner in
one case from the other. The embryo, for example, produces a succession of flat
bands on a curved, or flat surface, each one arising under different conditions from
the preceding one, and forming closed rings as best they may. In the adult an-
cestral forms, all the new segments were produced under essentially like con-
ditions, that is, as small closed rings at the apex of a cylinder.

In Limulus, an oblong area is enclosed between the posterior part of the con-
crescing germ wall and the broad anal plate. This area and its surrounding
germ wall, I shall call the caudal navel. (Fig. 141, ¢.nv.)

The inward proliferation in this region is very conspicuous and might be

246 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

mistaken for an extension of, or as a product of, apical growth. ‘This is not the
case. The yolk cells, or endoderm cells, formed around the posterior end of the
primitive streak and from the walls of the telopore, belong to the primitive germinal
area, and are the products of true apical growth. The post-anal proliferation in
the caudal navel is of a different nature. It represents an isolated part of the
degenerating hemal blastoderm, enclosed by a narrowing area formed by the germ
wall. The area is finally closed over by the definitive ectoderm, leaving behind
a special cloud of mesoderm and yolk cells formed by the united germ walls.

* * * * ok ok * * *

The conditions just described for Limulus and other arachnids give us the clue
to the correct interpretation of the phenomena of concrescence in the vertebrates.
Here there is no doubt a true axial, or apical growth, and a false axial growth
formed by the post-apical concrescence of two bands representing the proliferating
margins of the germinal area. But in vertebrates it is difficult to distinguish be-
tween that part of the embryo formed by apical growth and that formed by con-
crescence, and it has been assumed that there is no real distinction between them.
The primitive streak of vertebrates for example is often regarded as an ancient
line of concrescence, and the real concrescence that takes place behind it, as a
continuation of the same process, more formally expressed. Both the primitive
streak and the actual line of concrescence are supposed to represent different phases
of “‘a modified method of uniting the lips of a greatly elongated gastrula mouth.”
Minot. Embryology, p. 126. But according to our interpretation, there is no
remnant whatever of a gastrula mouth at the caudal end of any segmented animal.
The real apex of the body is an actively growing point composed of proliferating
teloblasts that give rise to the axial parts of the body. True axial growth cannot
take place by concrescence, because the parts thus united represent the extreme
lateral or hemal ends of the metameres forced into the neural, or axial, position
by the peculiar exigencies of apical growth on a spherical surface.

We may recognize in vertebrates, as in arachnids, an axial telopore, or primi-
tive streak, and post-apical concrescence of the margins of the germinal area.
But these modes of growth are so blended with one another in vertebrates that it
is extremely difficult to tell where one begins and the other ends.

The actual separation of the products of teloblastic growth varies widely in
different segmented animals. But the differences are in degree, or in method, not
in kind, or in end results. For example, in forms like Cymothoa, there is a trans-
verse row of large superficial teloblasts, which like the cells at the apex of a growing
plant stem, give rise in the most precise and regular manner, to the various parts
of the trunk.

In Limulus, in birds, reptiles, and mammals, there is a true axial infolding or
primitive streak, and the various products of apical growth that extend forward
from it may be recognized almost as fast as they are laid down. In amphioxus
and the tunicates, there is a much more extensive apical infolding, and the products

CONCRESCENCE, AND APICAL GROWTH. 247

of apical growth, which form the walls of the infolding, are not formally separated
into endoderm, mesoderm, and notochord till a relatively late period. To call
this infolding an “archenteron,” or “primitive gut,’’ and to then conclude that
the notochord was once a part of an alimentary canal, because it is for a brief
period united with the definitive endoderm, is no more justifiable than it would be

Fic. 155.—Photograph of a half grown Limulus

to assume that the endoderm is historically derived from an internal skeleton, be-
cause for a time it is continuous with the notochord.

As I pointed out in my first contribution on this subject, in 1889, the only avail-
able criterion as to what constitutes endoderm is evidence that it forms the lining
of a functional alimentary canal. From this point of view, it is clear that the only

248 EARLY STAGES OF ARTHROPOD AND VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS.

parts of the so-called “archenteron”’ that can be justly regarded as endodermic are
the two lateral bands that in both vertebrates and arthropods actually form the
lining of a functional alimentary canal. (Fig. 270.)

True gastrulation, comparable with the formation of an enteric chamber in
coelenterates, is a much less important process in arthropods and vertebrates than
has been supposed, and is confined to the central region of the procephalon.

CHAPTER XIV.

THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW; LOCOMOTOR AND RESPIRA-
TORY APPENDAGES.

The closing of the invertebrate mouth, the formation of a new one, and the
evolution of segmental appendages into leg-jaws, gill-sacs, and locomotor append-
ages are complex independent processes, but they are so interwoven with one
another in the early history of the vertebrates that they may be appropriately
treated together.

The salient features of the mouth and appendages in arthropods and verte-
brates may be contrasted as follows:

a. In arthropods, the mouth lies on the neural surface, and the foregut passes
through the brain floor between the two nerve cords, just behind the forebrain.
(Fig. 43.) In vertebrates the mouth lies on the hemal surface of the head, and
the foregut, without passing through the brain floor, leads directly into the mid-
gut. (Fig. 44.)

b. In arthropods there are many pairs of appendages, the most conspicuous
ones being arranged in rigid metameric order either on the sides or on the neural,
surface of the first thirteen to eighteen metameres. They may be absent in some
metameres, while in others they assume a great variety of forms suitable for loco-
motion, sense organs, jaws, gills, etc. (Fig. 3, A.C.) In primitive vertebrates,
metamerically arranged appendages like those of arthropods, appear to be
absent. The paired locomotor appendages, when present (pectoral and pelvic
fins) are not segmentally arranged; they are merely local expansions of longi-
tudinal folds, and they always lie posterior to the (16+) metameres that constitute
the head.

c. In arthropods the jaws are formed from several pairs of modified legs that
belong to the metameres lying just behind the forebrain. The basal joints of the
leg-jaws act as crushing mandibles, or as supplementary jaws. In chewing,
tasting, or preparing food, they work crosswise, to and from the median neural
line. In true vertebrates the jaws, in the adult stages, consist of two unpaired
arches, or an upper and a lower jaw. ‘They lie on the hemal surface instead of
the neural, and in chewing move forward and backward instead of crosswise.

d. In the arthropods, respiration is usually accomplished by means of
specially modified appendages that either project outward above the surface of the
body, or inward, forming ectodermic pouches, with vascular, lamellate walls.
In fishlike vertebrates the gills may, for a brief early period, consist of external
appendages of ectodermic origin, but in their later stages they consist of

249

250 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

pouches that lead from the gut to the exterior; and the whole or a part of the
respiratory tissue of the gill pouch is said to arise from the endoderm.

These striking differences are apparently irreconcilable, and have led many
zoologists to the conclusion that there can be no direct genetic relation between
these two groups of animals. We shall show in this chapter that there is no real
foundation for this belief, for when the facts are known and their meaning is
made clear, it will be seen that the vertebrate organs in question are of the same
nature as those in arthropods. It is true they have undergone a remarkable meta-
morphosis, but it is one brought about in a perfectly natural and consecutive
manner by the action of definite internal forces that can be recognized and their
probable effects, in a measure, estimated.

* ok * ok *K * * * *k

Argument.—Briefly stated, the argument and the evidence to be presented is
as follows: We shall show 1, that during the evolution of the arthropods the primi-
tive entrance to the midgut was being gradually closed, and in some cases actually
was closed, because the mouth was shifting into a more and more inaccessible
position, and because the stomodeum was becoming more and more constricted
by the growth of the surrounding organs. The remnants of this now useless
passageway may still be seen in its proper position on the floor of the closing
neural canal of vertebrates; this passageway is the infundibulum, and the remnants
of the foregut is the saccus vasculosus and the posterior part of the hypophysis.

2. That the foundations of a new mouth are already established in arthropods
in the cephalic navel, or so called “dorsal organ,” which lies on the hemal side
of the head in a position corresponding to that of the mouth in vertebrates. It
affords a transitory opening from the exterior into the midgut, and it, or the adja-
cent tissues, may serve as a means of attaching the animal to foreign objects, or
to its host. Thus in the arthropods, an organ of very great antiquity and habits
long established are prepared to perform the work of a new mouth after the verte-
brate fashion, as soon as the old mouth becomes permanently closed.

3. That in the arthropods several pairs of leg-jaws surround the mouth on the
neural surface of the body, and that the prevailing conditions in the arthropod
head tend to crowd the basal portions of these appendages toward the heemal sur-
face so that they converge around the infolding cephalic navel in the same manner
that the oral arches of vertebrates converge around the mouth. It will be shown
that in vertebrate embryos the oral arches first appear on the neural surface as
three or four pairs of appendicular arches, and that they then gradually shift
toward the hemal side, converging toward the “anlage’’ of the new mouth, and
forming the paired rudiments of the premaxillary, maxillary mandibular, and
hyoid arches. These paired arches’finally unite, the first two pairs forming the
upper, and the third pair, the lower jaw.

4. That in the ostracoderms, the oldest fossil vertebrate-like arthropods, the
mouth lies between paired jaws, which in chewing move to and from the middle

THE CLOSING OF THE OLD MOUTH. 251

line. Here, therefore, the adult condition of the jaws is intermediate between the
typical arthropod and the typical vertebrate condition, and is similar to the condi-
tion of the jaws in the higher vertebrate embryos.

5. That the gill pouches of vertebrates may be interpreted as invaginated
respiratory appendages, which have become secondarily united with enteric
pouches.

6. That the free portions of the cephalo-thoracic appendages of arthropods
are represented in vertebrates by embryonic oral tentacles, such as the “balancers”
and the external gills of amphibian larve, and the oar-like appendages of the
ostracoderms.

7. That the paired appendages of typical vertebrates, 7.e., pectoral and
pelvic fins, arise from a new generation of post-branchial metameres that are not
represented in arthropods. The lateral fold from which they arise may be re-
garded either as a marginal fringe of rudimentary appendages or as a series of
keel-like pleurites.

I. THE CLOSING OF THE OLD MOUTH.

It will be recalled that the alimentary canal of arthropods is formed in three
separate sections, the midgut arising from the endoderm, while the foregut and
hindgut arise from separate infoldings of the ectoderm. (Fig. 43.)

The infolding for the foregut, or stomodeum, is always formed in the median
portion of the procephalic lobes (Fig. 25); the lateral cords lying on either side
of it, and cross commissures in front and behind. (Fig. 46, A.) As these impor-
tant parts of the nervous system are formed at a very early period and are never
known to be absent, the stomodzum is securely trapped in a nerve ring from which
there is no escape.

There are several factors in the evolution of arthropods that steadily work
toward the closing up of this old passageway, or which make the access to it more
and more difficult.

In the more primitive arthropods there is ample room for the stomodeum and
for the passage through it of a liberal supply of food. But during the phylogeny
of the phyllopod-arachnid stock there is a great increase in the volume and com-
pactness of the anterior cranial neuromeres, which narrows in a very marked
degree the opening between the nerve cords for the passage of the stomodzum.
Moreover, in all arthropods there is a tendency for the rostrum, which represents a
fused pair of appendages lying in front of the mouth, to gradually work its way
backward, thus covering up the original site of the mouth, or carrying the entrance
to it a long way back of its original position. (Figs. 3, 46.) It may then be
surrounded by projecting appendages, or it may lie at the bottom of a long atrial
chamber, access to which can be obtained only in an indirect or roundabout man-
ner, as in cirripeds (Figs. 274, 275), cladocera and phyllopods (Figs. 7, 9 and 273.)

In many cases, the animal can never bring its mouth in direct contact with
its prey. Liquid foods must be pumped through long capillary tubes, formed by

252 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

the projecting parts of leg-jaws, as in many insects and arachnids; or microscopic
organisms must be kicked toward, or into the mouth, by the movements of the
legs, or of the posterior part of the body, as in cirripeds and cladocera.

In some cases, a combination of such conditions has actually led, in the later
stages of development, to the complete closure of the foregut, as in the adults
of certain lepidoptera and ephemeridz, which cease to feed after metamorphosis;
or in certain cirripeds, where the stomodzal opening into the midgut is closed
soon after the larval stages. (Figs. 280, 281.)

Thus we may recognize in the arthropods a steady, underlying trend to-
ward a more compact, voluminous nervous system, and toward a less efficient
stomodeum. ‘These internal conditions rigidly prescribe the possible modes of
life that are open to the animals in which they prevail. The pending extinction of
the foregut is the dominant factor in the life history of the arachnids, for it
has made a liquid diet, sucked through capillary tubes, imperative. For that
reason a blood sucking, or a parasitic mode of life, is practically universal among
them, just as sucking the blood of animals, or the juices of plants, is universal
in certain groups of insects. In all these cases, the animals appear to be making the
best of a desperate situation, adjusting their lives with great precision to meet the
inevitable march of events within.

Another important factor in the closing of the old mouth was the conversion
of the medullary plate into a medullary tube. This process is well advanced in
the arthropods, reaching its highest development in the arachnids. There a
true cerebral vesicle is formed that includes the whole forebrain, although the
advancing palial fold of the embryo just fails to reach and enclose the oral region.
(Fig. 46, B.)

In the arachnids we may recognize all the important preliminary steps, such
as the formation of neural crests, axial infolding, and a forebrain palium, lead-
ing up to the conversion of the medullary plate into a medullary tube. But in no
arthropod does the process reach a condition that definitely shuts up the oral
opening inside the neural tube, thereby cutting off access to the foregut from the
outside world.

But this event does take place in the vertebrates. In the frog embryos,
during the open medullary plate stage, we may see a minute pit with a faint
prominence in front of it that appears to represent the rostrum and stomodzal
infolding of the arachnids. (Fig. 25.) As the medullary plate closes, the pit
deepens, giving rise to the infundibulum, or the ancient passageway for the
stomodeum, while the epithelial sac that lines it and projects out of it, is the
saccus vasculosus and the posterior part of the hypophysis, or the remnants
of the stomodzum itself.

We have shown in the chapters on the nervous system that the location and
relations of the principal nerve centers and tracts, and especially the location of
the primary gustatory and swallowing centers is entirely in harmony with this
view.

THE NEW MOUTH. 253

At just what stage in the closing of the medullary plate, the mouth ceased to
communicate with the exterior cannot, at present, be determined. The final
closure was no doubt hastened by the crowding of the optic ganglia upward and
backward over the oral region. This would leave the broadest part of the primi-
tive brain, i.c., the region of the fourth ventricle and the rhomboidal sinus, wide
open; and in this region, which is now covered only by the choroid plexus, there
remained, probably for some time, an opening through which the old stomodeum
could communicate with the exterior. (Figs. 3, 46, D.)

Thus, with the knowledge acquired after the event, we may look back a few
million years, and trace with our mind’s eye, the slow, inevitable approach and
consummation of the most momentous event in organic evolution.

IJ. THe NEw Moura.

A group of animals in which the natural growth of one essential part inevita-
bly eliminates some other part equally essential, is doomed to extinction, unless
among the organs already at hand a radical redistribution of functions is possible
at the moment the critical period arrives. No organ was ever created, we may be
sure, to meet an organic crisis in the future, or was ever produced, de novo, at the
demand of a present necessity. We are bound to assume that unless a suitable
organ stands ready to do the work of the one that has been eliminated, no way
out of the difficulty is possible.

Such was the situation when the great crisis in the evolution of vertebrates
was at hand; either the evolution of the brain must cease, or a new entrance to the
midgut must be established elsewhere. The alimentary organs proved most
pliable. But how significant it is that the momentum of nerve growth should so
dominate the growth of other organs, and the form of the nervous system so
modify that of the whole body!

No doubt one important factor in the competitive development of brain and
stomodzum is the increasing volume of the yolk sphere; for the presence of more
yolk postpones to a later and later embryonic stage the time when the stomodeum
becomes functional, and thus allows the precociously developing nervous system to
undergo its early stages of development, unmodified by the action of the stomo-
dum in feeding.

In the arthropods, a very old organ, the “dorsal organ,” or cephalic navel,
having originally a very different function from that of alimentation, stood ready
to take, the place of the old mouth that was being slowly eliminated. Its presence
alone made the existence of the vertebrates, as we know them, a possibility.

We have shown in a previous chapter, that the ‘‘dorsal organ,” in part at
least, is the product of the mechanical conditions created by apical growth on a
spherical surface. It is, as it were, a vortex center, toward which all the adjacent
organs converge. It exists, either actually or potentially, on the anterior hemal
surface of all arthropod embryos, its definitive position being controlled, in any

)

254 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

given case, by the shape and volume of the yolk sphere, and by the amount of
“‘cephalization” that has taken place.

“Cephalization” takes place according to a definite law of growth which
applies to all segmented animals. According to this law, the lateral members of
the anterior metameres tend to atrophy in proportion to their relative distance from
the median line and their nearness to the anterior end. In other words, there is
a steadily progressive tendency to eliminate by degeneration, the lateral members
of the more anterior metameres, and to enlarge and specialize the median ones.*

Thus in the higher arthropods there are no fully developed appendages or

Eni wee es,
SO

iaaeee

iw) fib lco[o br

Fic. 156.—Diagrams to illustrate the method of bilateral apical growth. A, Hypothetical symmetrical
checker board arrangement of unlike parts in mercator projection, seen from the neural surface; The serial
equality (homology), of the elements is supposed to be perfect. B and C, Approximate method of producing
such a field by a combination of apical and bilateral division of units. D, The same, seen as a cylindrical object
from the side. E, The same, in cross-section, composed of four, unlike concentric superimposed layers.

other somatic organs lateral to the procephalic lobes; and no organs in the lateral
plate region of the first nine or ten metameres. The scanty, or degenerating,
tissues that form where the lateral organs should be, are gradually crowded by the
growth of the more vigorous posterior ones into an oval area on the hemal surface
of the embryo, just behind the forebrain, where the degenerating hemal blasto-
derm sinks into the yolk and is absorbed. (Fig. 135.)

In insects, the ruptured embryonic membranes play an important part in this
process; they complicate it, but do not alter its essential nature. In many arth-
ropod embryos, the dorsal organ becomes a formal invagination into the yolk,
with well-defined epithelial walls, or it may consist merely of a great cloud of in-
growing cells. In both cases, the deeper cells are the first to dissolve in the yolk
mass that will later be enclosed within the midgut.

A “dorsal organ” of some such nature as this occurs in all classes of arthropods.

Not to be confused with median fusion and degeneration. See p. 277.

THE ORAL ARCHES. 255

I have called it a cephalic navel, or cephalic fistula, because it is a center of con-
vergent growth; a region of ingrowth, or outgrowth, around the point where the
hemal surface of the head and the gut is finally closed.

The cephalic navel usually closes during the embryonic stages, leaving, in a
morphological sense, a barren area behind. But in many cases, either the dorsal
organ, or some other organ in the same place, persists as an adhesive disc, or a
voluminous outgrowth, by means of which the animal attaches itself to some for-
eign object. In some parasitic cirripeds, the cephalic outgrowth is buried in the
tissues of the host, the old mouth closes, and the animals are then said to absorb
nutrition through the walls of the cephalic outgrowth.

We have merely to assume for certain stages a somewhat longer duration than
now occurs in any arthropod, to make the dorsal organ a new gateway to the gut;
for surely a cephalic fistula leading into the midgut, permanently open at both
ends, and used to hold fast to animate, or to inanimate objects, is competent to
take the place of the old mouth.

The closing of the old mouth and the evolution of the new one, therefore, was
going on in the same animals atthe same time. The critical period of substituting
one for the other was during the embryonic stages, when both of the organs may
have opened into the gut at the same time. During the embryonic stages, a con-
siderable time would be available for readjustment, for owing to the large amount
of food yolk in the eggs of primitive vertebrates, a relatively long time might
elapse before the absorption of food from without became imperative. Whether
the actual closing of the old mouth, or the opening of the new one, took place first
or last, is of little consequence, for the consummation of one event would probably
accelerate the advent of the other.

III. THe Jaws or ORAL ARCHES.

In reconstructing the history of the vertebrate mouth, it is not enough merely
to account for the closing of the old mouth and the origin of the new opening into
the alimentary canal. ‘To make the account complete, it is necessary to explain
the origin of the important organs which surround it, such as the jaws, or oral
arches, the hypophysis, tear duct, and the principal outgrowths from the adjacent
pharyngeal cavity.

The circumoral organs of primitive vertebrates are best interpreted as the
remnants of several pairs of arthropod leg-jaws, or other appendages, that have
been crowded onto the hemal surface by the peculiar mechanical conditions which
prevail in the developing head.

An arthropod appendage may be defined as an ectodermic outgrowth consist-
ing of several branches, or stems, located on the hemal or lateral side of the body,
adjacent to the main nerve axis. In the higher forms, e.g., the arachnids, one stem
forms the typical appendage. On its median basal margin is a prominent sensory
spur, or gustatory organ, from which in the early embryonic stages arises a large

256 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

ganglion, that lies between the appendage and the medullary plate. (Fig. 136.)
On the outer margin there may be a second row of sense organs, and various
infoldings of an excretory or respiratory nature. On its posterior basal surface a
gill, or respiratory plates or filaments, may be developed.

Each appendage is associated with a hollow block of mesoderm, or somite,
that lies beneath the basal lobe, and gives rise to the associated muscular and excre-
tory tissues. (Fig. 134, 138, so.) The mesoderm extends beyond the appendages
as a thin double layer of cells, the lateral plates, from which the somatic and

Fic. 157.—Diagrams illustrating the growth of organic films on a nutrient surface. The figures are intended
to show how association, and the time element involved in combined apical and bilateral growth of an organic film
on a plain, or spherical nutrient surface, automatically creates lines of unlike conditions that are coincident with
the lines of morphological and physiological specialization. A B and C, Successive stages in the growth of such a
film, showing the necessarily unlike character of the initial and terminal element (cephalic and caudal), and of
the median and lateral ones, and that this unlikeness increases with the progress of growth. D, A still older
stage, in side view perspective.

splanchnic tissues of that metamere, if any are present, arise, /.p1. The cavities
enclosed in the mesoblastic somites, so long as the somites retain their identity,
do not communicate with one another. On the other hand, the space between
the somatic and splanchnic layers of the successive lateral plates, is not divided
into separate compartments (thorax), or if it is (abdomen), they speedily break
down, forming a continuous coelomic chamber on each side of the body. The
third elements associated with the appendages are the outgrowths from the mid-
gut that form the so-called “liver lobes,” or the enteric diverticula, or the gut
pouches. (Figs. 150, 154, 179, 180.)

THE ORAL ARCHES. 257

In dealing with the morphology of a true segmental appendage, we must
recognize and account for these various parts.

As a rule, the free part of the oral appendages in arthropods is very small,
or even absent, while the basal portion, the somite, sense organ, and ganglion,
may be of considerable size. If this condition is associated, as it usually is in the
higher arthropods, with a voluminous and precocious forebrain, a large yolk
sphere, and with the absence of lateral plate structures, the tendency during the
early embryonic periods will be to raise the forebrain off the yolk surface and
thrust it forward, leaving the way open for the basal lobes of the more anterior
appendages to unite on the hemal surface, around the center formed by the cephalic

navel. (Figs. 17, 31, 33, 135-)

Fic. 158.—Mercator projections of vertebrate embryos.

Under the influence of these conditions, the more anterior appendages in
certain adult arthropods have been transferred, either to the anterior surface of
the head, to a position halfway between the neural and hemal surfaces, i.e., the
chelicere of arachnids (Figs. 17, 43), or almost to the hemal surface, 7.e., the
antennz of cladocera (Fig. 9), and many parasitic copepods (Figs. 282, 283); or
they are transferred definitely to the hemal surface, close to the region of the
cephalic navel, i.e., the antenne in all cirripeds. (Figs. 274, 280.)

It is seen, therefore, that in the arthropods the increasing size and precocity
of the forebrain, the degeneration of the lateral members of the anterior meta-
meres, the increasing size of the yolk sphere, and the time factors involved in
apical growth on a spherical surface, all conspire to crowd the appendages and
their associated parts toward the hemal surface of the head. (Compare the
mercator projections in Fig. 157 with Figs. 17, 31, 32, 158, 160.)

* 2 * * * * * * *

Development of the Oral Arches in the Frog.—In the embryos of primi-
tive vertebrates, the transfer of oral arches to the hemal surface of the head is
17

258 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

accomplished in the manner indicated for arthropods, and the successive steps in
the process may be followed with comparative ease in the frog.* In the study of
this process in the frog, large numbers of eggs were hardened, usually in chromic
or picric acid solutions, the membranes removed by eau de Javelle, and the most
sharply sculptured specimens examined as opaque objects, under a strong oblique
illumination.

Soon after the closure of the medullary plate one may see the outlines of
two or three pairs of faintly marked ridges that represent the earliest stages of
the oral arches. (Fig. 159.) Behind them are two pairs of more prominent ones,
representing either the first two gill arches, or the hyoid arch and the first gill
arch. The primitive ora] arches curve downward and forward, eventually unit-
ing between the anterior end of the brain and the anlage of the sucking disc, at
the point where the mouth appears later. (Fig. 160.)

The general appearance of the primitive oral arches, and the rate at which
they concresce, varies considerably in different embryos, and it has not been pos-
sible to identify them with those that are seen in this region at a later period,
but the two shown in Figs. 159, 160, appear to represent the anlage of the pre-
maxillary and maxillary arches. After concrescence takes place, the arches, for
a short period, become indistinguishable.

md. ;
JE"

Fic. 159.—Frog embryos, seen from side, showing the extension of the primitive craterctice gill arches, and lateral
plates, toward the hemal surface. Rana septemtrionalis.

In the following stages (Fig. 161, A), the oral region is bounded in front by a
conspicuous transverse groove that terminates at either end in the nasal pit, ol.o.;
on the posterior side it is bounded by the sucking disc. A longitudinal groove now
extends along the middle of the intervening space, intersected by three transverse
ones, a small pit being formed at each intersection. The oral field is thus divided
into at least three pairs of lobes that are clearly serially homologous with one
another. The first pair represents the premaxille, p.mv., the second, the
maxille, m«., and the third, the mandibles, md.

In the following stages, the lobes become more prominent, and the longitud-
inal groove becomes deeper and wider, B and C. The premaxillary lobes then

!Mr E E. Just, 1906, and Mr. A. O. Kelly, 1908, students in biology at Dartmouth, have assisted in work-
ng out the history of the embryonic and larval jaws of the frog.

THE ORAL ARCHES. 259

unite, obliterating a part of the median groove. Between the anterior margins
of the premaxillary lobes a small pit is left that gradually deepens, forming the
anlage of the hypophysis, D, E, F, hyp.

The prominent maxillary lobes move laterally and forward and unite with the
premaxille, although they are still distinctly marked off from them by the second

PS oat uae

Fic. 160.—Frog embryos seen from the anterior end, showing the concrescence of the oral metamers in front, and on
the hemal side of the fore brain. Rana septemtrionalis.

Fic. 161.—Frog embryos, seen from the anterior hemal sufrace of the head, showing successive stages in the
concrescence of the three pairs of oral arches, the pre-maxille, maxilla, and mandibles, and their relation to the
apex of the forebrain, to the mouth, hypophysis and sucking discs. R. septemtrionalis.

transverse groove, E and F, mx. This groove finally extends past the olfactory
pits toward the eyes, probably initiating the formation of the tear duct. The
mandibular lobes, meantime, have become very prominent. Later they unite in
the median line to form the lower jaw, E and F, md.

260 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

In the early larval stages, all traces of the paired oral arches have disappeared
and we have instead the characteristic larval mouth of the amphibia, with the
V-shaped mandibles and the maxille sheathed in horn, surrounded by prominent
lips. The latter form a shallow antechamber fringed with sensory papille, that
resembles the pre-oral in chamber Amphioxus, Bothriolepis and the cyclostomes.
(Figs. 164, 165, 166, 177-178.)

The mouth itself, owing to the gradual union of the paired arches on the
hemal surface, undergoes a remarkable transformation. It first appears as a
very long median furrow. As the anterior end is obliterated by the union of the
premaxille and the posterior end by the union of the mandibles, the remaining
median portion widens, taking on first an hexagonal contour, and then the form
of a transverse slit, with a continuous maxillary arch in front and a mandibular
arch behind. (Fig. 161.)

The median groove that initiates the opening into the enteron, may be
regarded as the remnant of the primitive cephalic navel of arthropods, and its
subsequent changes in form, as the result of the way in which the oral arches
unite around it.

The anterior end of this groove, or the part lying, during the earliest stages,
between the premaxillary lobes, becomes deeper than the rest, and marks the
beginning of the mouth, C. A little later, this depression is most pronounced
between the maxillary lobes, E and F.

The hypophysis may be regarded as the remnant of a pair of excretory
glands similar to those on the outer margin of the anterior cephalic appendages in
arachnids. In ancestral vertebrates they were probably situated on the margins
of the premaxillary lobes, their unpaired condition being due to the median fusion
of the appendages to which they belonged.

The “tear duct” may be regarded as a specialization of the groove that
originally separated the maxillary and premaxillary arches.

The development of the mouth and oral arches of the frog may be regarded
as the typical mode of development in vertebrates. A condition like that just
described is clearly present in other amphibia, as in Amblystoma (Fig. 168), and
in the sturgeon (Fig. 174). Even in the mammals we may see indications of the
same structure, the fronto-nasal process probably representing in part the fused
premaxillary lobes of the frog.

In Bdellostoma, three pairs of oral lobes, comparable with those in the frog
are preserved even in adult stages. (Fig. 175.) In petromyzon there has been a
greater median fusion, for the remnants of the premaxillary lobes, the olfactory
pits, and the hypophysis have apparently been absorbed in a single median infold-:
ing lying in front of the maxillary arch.

In the most primitive vertebrate-like animals of all, the ostracoderms, the
mouth parts of the adult were in a condition similar to those of Bdellostoma, or to
those in the embryonic stages of the frog and sturgeon. (See Chapter XX, p. 373.)

Conclusion.—We may therefore conclude that the mouth of vertebrates is

THE GILL ARCHES AND THE EXTERNAL GILLS. 201

surrounded by at least three distinct pairs of segmentally arranged arches, com-
parable on the one hand with the gill arches of the postoral region, and on the
other with the cephalic appendages of arthropods.

The prevalent view, first advanced I believe, by Gegenbaur, that there is in
vertebrates but a single pair of oral arches consisting of the mandibles—the maxil-
le being regarded merely as a forward extension of their proximal ends—was
based largely on the relations of the skeletal structures of adult fishes, and is
clearly untenable.

IV. Tse Girt ARCHES AND THE EXTERNAL. GILLS.

The oral arches are clearly comparable with the gill arches that lie behind
them. In the embryos of primitive vertebrates, however, the gill arches, owing
to their more posterior position and to the presence of cardiac elements on their
lateral margins, do not unite on the hemal surface of the head, although the more
anterior ones move almost as far in that direction as the oral arches do. (Figs.
162, 163, 168.)

A conspicuous feature of the gill arch in primitive vertebrates is the external
gill. Budgett has well described them as follows. He states (p. 274), that in
Lepidosiren, Protopterus, and in the more primitive amphibia, each gill “arises as
an outgrowth from the outer side of the visceral arch, and is composed of a mesen-
chymatous core with ectodermal covering. . They develop well before the
perforation of the gill clefts. . . . and the aortic arch itself is in early stages
simply the vessel of the external gill.” He concludes that the external gills are
organs of great antiquity, which were probably characteristic of primitive verte-
brates, not merely larval adaptations of no special significance.

For my own part, I see no reason to doubt that the external gills of vertebrates
represent the remnants of the thoracic appendages of their arthropod ancestors,
for they strongly resemble them in form, position, and direction of growth. Com-
pare, for example, the external gills of an embryo Protoperus (Fig. 173), with those
of an arachnid (Figs. 26-32), and observe also the identity in their arrangement
on the mercator projections (Figs. 157, 158), and the details of their structure and
mode of branching.

In many primitive vertebrates, similar organs are found on the oral arches.
In the larve of Amblystoma (Figs. 168, 169), there are long rod-like appendages
attached either to the mandibular or to the hyoid arch. These so-called “balan-
cers”’ are clearly serially homologous with the external gills of the more posterior
arches. Similar organs are found in other amphibia, as in Zenopus (Fig. 170);
the great oar-like appendages of the ostracoderms are in all probablility of a
similar nature.

In the frog, the adhesive discs appear to represent the remnants of vestigial
appendages or external gills, belonging to either the mandibular, or the hyoid
arch. Note for instance their positions in Figs. 161, Z and F and in Figs. 164,

262 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

16s, 167, a.d.o. In adult cyclostomes in place of these organs, there are three
pairs of tentacle-like appendages, belonging apparently to the premaxillary,
maxillary, and mandibular arches (Fig. 175); and in embryo sturgeons, there

pre opl ckl. Ps pen np.d.
4.8. y,

Fics. 162 AND 163.—Frog embryos, seen from the side, showing the beginning of the external gills, or cephalic appen-
dages, operculum, cranial ganglia,andoralarches. R.septemtrionalis.

op xg

p-brc.

Fics. 164, 165 AND 166.—Young tadpole of R. septemtrionalis. Fig. 164.—Tadpole from the side, showing
early stage in the formation of the peribranchial chamber. Fig. 165.—Same; older stage; gills completely en-
closed in peribranchial chamber. Fig. 166.—Oral region, from in front.

appears to be a pair of similar structures on the premaxillary and one on the
maxillary arch. (Fig. 174.) In Polypterus, Budgett has described a “cement
organ,” similar to the mandibular glands of the frog, located at first in front of

THE GILL SACS. 263

the mouth, but finally coming to lie inside of it, apparently on the premaxillary
lobes (Figs. 171, 172.) Premaxillary discs also occur in Lepidopterus and Amia.

* * * * * * * * co

There can be but one inference from the facts that have been enumerated,
namely, that the so-called “visceral arches” of vertebrates represent the basal
lobes of the cephalo-thoracic appendages of their arthropod ancestors and; that the
external gills, the balancing organs of amphibia, the cephalic oars of ostracoderms,
the tentacles, and adhesive discs of the oral arches in embryonic fishes and
amphibia are serially homologous structures, representing the remnants of the
cephalothoracic appendages themselves.

Similar modifications of the appendages frequently occur in various classes
of arthropods. For example, in insect embryos (Blatta and Acilius) the first pair
of abdominal appendages are reduced to gland-like discs or cups, very similar
in appearance to the cement glands on the oral arches of embryo fishes and
amphibia. Beyond this, their function and significance is unknown. In many
crustacea, entomostraca, and cirripeds, one or two pairs of degenerate cephalic
appendages terminate in adhesive discs by means of which they fasten themselves
to foreign objects, or to their hosts, just as larval vertebrates use their cement
glands for a similar purpose.*

It remains to be seen how far a more detailed study of the structure and
growth of the oral arches in primitive vertebrates will confirm the above interpre-
tation. So far as we know, there is nothing in the embryonic history of the meso-
dermic head cavities, or of the oral arch nerves and ganglia, that conflicts with it,
while all the data available concerning the superficial form and the mode of
growth of these organs lend it their unqualified support.

V. THE Git Sacs. THE THYROID AND THE THYMUS.

In many fishes and amphibia the external gills disappear and their place is
taken by internal gills developed at a later period from the walls of gill sacs or
pouches. The latter are formed between the gill arches by an infolding of the
ectoderm that unites with a tubular outgrowth from the mesenteron. It is not
clear whether the new gill lamellz arise solely from the entodermic, or from the
ectodermic part of the gill chamber, or from both, although the prevalent opinion
strongly favors the first alternative.

However that may be, it is a fact, the significance of which is readily apparent,
that in the arachnids there is the same kind of gill sacs, having the same relation
to external appendages, located in the same region of the head, and having the
same relation to enteric outgrowths, as in the embryos of primitive vertebrates.

1The origin of the secreting surface of the cement glands from the endoderm is not in conflict with this

view. It merely confirms the interpretation of the several oral arches as serially homologous with the gill
arches.

264 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

In the-crustacea the gill usually consists of a special plate, or plume-like pro-
cess arising from the basal lobe of a biramus appendage. In Limulus and in the
eurypterids, it consists of many lamelle arising from the covered posterior basal
surface of the abdominal appendages. (Fig. 5.) In abnormal limulus embryos,
the thoracic appendages are often completely infolded, forming a leg pocket in-
stead of a leg process, suggesting the infolded respiratory appendages that have
become the normal condition in the air breathing arachnids. In the case of the

~ Fic. 167.—Tadpole of frog. A, Hemal surface; B, older stage, seen from the hemal surface as a semi-
transparent object, and showing the relations of the oral, respiratory, and digestive orgas; C, same specimen
from the neural surface. Figs. 164 to 167 show frog tadpoles in the ostracoderm stages.

scorpion, the respiratory lamelle arise from an infolding just behind a small,
rudimentary appendage; the latter then disappears without forming a part of the
gill chamber.

Without going any further into the discussion of the infinite variety of arthro-
pod respiratory appendages, these facts stand out clearly, namely: r. there is a
tendency to restrict the respiratory function to a small group of metameres, four
or five in number, more or less, following the oral or locomotor ones; 2. that in

THE GILL SACS. 265

the true respiratory appendages, the non-respiratory part is often rudimentary or
absent; and 3, that in the higher forms of arachnids, the respiratory part of the
appendage is deeply infolded to form the walls of a gill sac.

We conclude from the above facts that approximately the same group of

Fic. 168.—Amblystoma larve, showing the vestigeal cephalic appendages in the form of external gills, or the
“balancers’’ of the oral arches.

,

Fic. 169.—Amblystoma tadpole, showing the balancers,”’ c.a.p., at the height of their development.

appendages, which in the arachnids have become partly or wholly infolded to
form the respiratory sacs, have retained that function in primitive vertebrates, and
have given rise to the ectodermic portion of the visceral clefts, or branchial cham-
bers. We also conclude that no vertebrate, however primitive, ever possessed

266 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

functional gill-clefts in front of the hyoid arch metamere or any considerable
distance back of the metameres which are now provided with gills in typical fishes.

VI. THe Gut PoucueEs.

The midgut of the arthropods, in its typical condition, may be regarded as a
straight tube with lateral diverticula, or pouches segmentally arranged. In primi-
tive crustacea there may be either a single unbranched diverticulum directed
forward and hemally from the anterior end of the gut, cladocera (Fig. 9); or one
or more pairs of branching lobes, as in phyllopods (Fig. 273), and many cirripeds.
(Fig. 275.)

In the arachnids the gut pouches of the thoracic and abdominal regions
become very highly developed, forming one of the most conspicuous features of
their internal structure. Their structure and development is clearly seen in
Limulus. Here the cephalothoracic yolk mass gradually breaks up into six pairs
of lateral lobes. (Figs. 149, 150, Jv.l"°.) The five anterior pairs form a group
by themselves and open into the midgut by a single channel. The sixth pair may

Fic. 170.—Tadpole larva of Zenopus levis, Daud. After Bles. 60mm. long.

be distinguished from the others by its larger size, the absence of enclosed cells
derived from the hemal blastoderm and by the fact that it opens into the gut by a
separate channel. (Fig. 151 lv.l°.)

In the later stages, a pair of lobes develop from its hemal surface and extend
forward and backward, forming the anlage of a special system of hemal gut tubes.
(Figs. 151, 154 a.b.) In the adult, the extensive ramifications of the lateral tubes
fill the greater part of the cephalothorax, the branches of the posterior hemal
tubes, b, being apparently the only ones that extend into the abdomen. In
the young scorpion, a similar arrangement is seen. (Fig. 179.) The sixth pair,
the so-called salivary glands, /.t./., are large and open, as in Limulus, by separate
ducts. The five anterior pairs a.t.J., are reduced to small blind pockets. The
hemal lobes /.t.J., are well developed, the large anterior horns extending forward,
over the hemal surface of the forebrain. (Fig. 43.) In the branchial region, there
are six pairs of pouches, the first corresponding to the comb segment, the next four
to the lung books, and the sixth extending backward into the last mesothoracic
segment. (Figs. 43, 179.)

In the pedipalpi, the large hemal lobes of the thorax are united by a transverse
anastomosis. In the pycnogonida and in the spiders, the long thoracic diverticulas
are unbranched, and may extend a considerable distance into the base of the legs.
(Fig. 180.) In the spiders, there are also four pairs of abdominal pouches.

THE GUT POUCHES. 267

In primitive vertebrates, a variable number of lateral gut pouches are formed
belonging to the postoral group of metameres. They unite with the adjacent gill
pockets, and thus establish a communication between the gut and the exterior, via
the enteric diverticula and the ancestral gill pockets.

Fic. 171, 172.—Larva of Polypterus senegalus, showing rudimentary maxillary appendages, or adhesive papilla.
After Budgett.

What caused the opening of one organ into the other in ancestral vertebrates
we do not know, any more than we know why it actually takes place now in the
embryos of modern vertebrates. For our present purpose, it is sufficient to show
that in the arachnid ancestors of the vertebrates the gill pockets and enteric diver-
ticula stand in the same relation to each other and to the rest of the head that

Fic. 173.—Larve of Protopterus annectens, showing the highly developed external gills. A, Seventh day em-
byro; B, tenth day. After Budgett.

they now do in vertebrate embryos before the perforation takes place. We are
here dealing with one of those cases where there are no intermediate stages between
two very different conditions, for either the gut tubes open into the gill chamber,
or they do not; if they do, we are dealing with animals of the vertebrate type; if
not, with those of the invertebrate type.

268 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

The most anterior of the lateral gut pouches in the vertebrates corre-
spond with those of the locomotor appendages of the arachnids. They probably
atrophied in the immediate ancestors of the vertebrates, neither communicating
with the exterior, nor leaving any definite organs behind.* The paired hemal
outgrowth of the thoracic gut probably persists as the thyroid gland, with which
it agrees in position and direction of growth. (Figs. 43, 44, 308.)

In the arachnids the free ends of the lateral and of the hemal enteric pouches
of the thorax are usually branched, or lobular, or racemous, the subdivisions con-
sisting of a single layer of cylindrical secreting cells that suggest, in their general
appearance, the condition presented by the thyroid in vertebrates, and by those
organs resembling the thyroids that arise from the walls of the visceral clefts.

The thymus probably represents a modification of the several pairs of thoracic
coxal glands that occur in the arachnids.

The postbranchial outgrowths of the vertebrate mesenteron, 7.¢., the lungs,
liver, and pancreas may be regarded as local specializations of enteric diver-
ticula comparable with the endodermic portions of the visceral clefts. (Figs.
181, 182.)

VII. Tue Locomotor APPENDAGES.

A. The Cephalic Appendages.—In the higher arthropods, locomotionis effected
by several pairs of jointed appendages arranged in strictly segmental order, and
usually located anterior to the respiratory region. (Figs. 3, 4,5.) In true verte-
brates the locomotor appendages are always situated behind the gills; there are
never more than two pairs; and they have no fixed relation tothe metameres. (Fig.
4, B and C.)

The meaning of this sharp contrast will appear after a more careful examina-
tion of their structure and serial location in the two groups, and in the intermediate
one formed by the ostracoderms.

In free swimming phyllopods and arachnids, there may be one pair of large
oar-like appendages that arise from the anterior end of the thorax, as for example
the antenne of many cladocera and entomostraca, or the elongated chelicere of
Pterygotus. Or such a pair may arise from the posterior part of the thorax, as in
Eurypterus. (Fig. 5.) In all these cases the locomotor appendages lie in front of
the respiratory region.

In typical vertebrates the paired locomotor appendages, if present, consist
primarily of two lateral folds that extend from the postbranchial to the precaudal
region. The pectoral and pelvic fins are local expansions of these folds. The
paired fins are not definite segmental structures, for they consist of muscle buds and
cartilages derived from a large and varying number of metameres.

As there are approximately sixteen or more metameres in the vertebrate head,

1Possibly they may be represented by the ‘lateral thyroids’ and by the diverticula leading into the
cement glands of amphibia.

THE CEPHALIC APPENDAGES AND THE LATERAL FOLD. 269

it is clear that the paired fins of vertebrates cannot represent any arthropod ap-
pendages in front of the sixteenth pair.

The clue to the whole problem of vertebrate and arthropod locomotor ap-
pendages will be found in the ostracoderms, where both cephalic appendages of
the arthropod type, and lateral folds of the trunk, like those in true vertebrates,
are present.

In Bothriolepis oar-like cephalic appendages are present that clearly belong
to the anterior division of the head, for they lie immediately behind the oral
arches and in front of the gills. (Fig. 4, A,247.) In Cephalaspis the large
paddle-shaped appendages are of the same general nature and lie in a similar posi-
tion. (Fig. 232,234.) In Tremataspis portions of armored appendages have been
found similar to those in Bothriolepis, that fit into the most anterior of a series of
nine pairs of notches, or openings. The eight posterior pairs served either for
the attachment of smaller appendages, comparable with external gills, or as

Fig. 174 Fic. 175

Fic. 174.—Embryos of the sturgeon; showing the rudimentary cephalic appendages of the oral arches.
After Salensky.
Fic. 175.—Oral region of an adult Cyclostome (Bdellostoma) showing three pairs of rudimentary oral-arch appen-
dages. Compare with the oral arches of an amphibian embryo, Fig. 161.

openings to respiratory chambers containing the internal gills. (Fig. 236.) In
Cyathaspis, Drepanaspis, Paleaspis, and Pteraspis, there are indications of ex-
ternal cephalic appendages in the form of armored “oars” like those in Bothrio-
lepis, or in the form of naked tentacles. (Figs. 244-246.)

The cephalic appendages of the ostracoderms no doubt represent the same
kind of organs as the external gills, the balancers, and the oral arch tentacles of
primitive vertebrate embryos, and all these structures probably represent various
modifications of the cephalothoracic appendages of the arachnids.

B. The Fringing Processes and the Lateral Fold.—In those ostracoderms that
are well enough preserved to show the shape of the body, the postcephalic portion
has a triangular outline in cross-section, with either a series of distinct separately
movable plates of peculiar structure on either margin, or a continuous membran-
ous fold, with or without, supporting specules or minute ossicles.

In Bothriolepis the trunk was practically naked and was provided with two
narrow membranous folds projecting freely from the hemo-lateral margins. The
folds extended from the root of the trunk backward, uniting with each other on

270 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

the hemal surface at the base of the caudal fin. (Fig. 248.) This fold is usually
sharply defined and shows no trace of subdivisions or of supporting rays.

In a small undescribed species of Cephalaspis from Dalhousie, N.B., a similar
fold is present, but it appears to be strengthened by minute, ill-defined spicules.
(Fig. 234.)

In the larger species, like C. lyellii and C. murchsonii, in place of a membran-
ous fold, there is a series of separately movable processes, segmentally arranged
and covered with a dermal skeleton having the same surface ornamentation as
that on the rest of the body. There is nothing in true fishes exactly comparable
with these remarkable structures.

In C. lyellii (Fig. 232), the fringing processes hang freely away from the trunk,
in a nearly vertical position, with their distal ends bending backward in graceful
curves. Each process has a slender neck and rounded head that fits into a cup-like
depression on the posterior ventral margin of the large dorso-lateral trunk scales.
(Fig. 233,C.) There are from twenty to thirty pairs, beginning just back of the
cephalic shield and gradually decreasing in size from that point toward the tail
end. The most posterior ones are reduced to mere spines or rhomboidal plates,
loosely articulated to the lateral trunk scales.

In C. murchisonii the fringe plates are distinctly lobed, and overlap one an-
other so that their flattened surfaces are directed diagonally forward and outward.
(Fig. 233, D.) In Cephalaspis pagei they appear to have a similar shape and
arrangement, but are armed with coarse projecting spines that give them a
decidedly arthropod appearance. (Fig. 233, £.)

There can be no doubt that the fringing processes represent an initial stage
in the formation of a lateral fold like that in the embryos of true fishes. They
may be regarded as small segmentally arranged locomotor appendages compar-
able with arthropod abdominal appendages, but belonging to metameres lying
farther back than any that occur in that class of animals. An alternative inter-
pretation would be to regard them as a series of overhanging pleurites like those in
the trilobites and in many other arthropods.

We may therefore conclude that the oral arches, gill arches, external gills,
“balancers,” the lateral folds of vertebrate embryos, the cephalic oars and fring-
ing processes of the ostracoderms, are various local modifications of one set of
serially homologous structures, that are in turn comparable with the segmental
appendages of arthropods. The pectoral and pelvic fins of true vertebrates are
to be regarded as comparatively recent modifications of the lateral folds, and
as containing the remnants of a large and varying number of such appendages.

This interpretation of the origin of the paired appendages gives us precisely
what Gegenbaur claims has heretofore been lacking in the lateral fold theory,
namely: r. a reason for the existence of the primary fold of ectoderm that initiates
the formation of the lateral fold; 2. a reason for the migration into it of segmental
detachments of muscle, nerve, and cartilage; and 3. a primary function for the
lateral fold, out of which a set of locomotor organs could be logically developed.

CONCLUSION. 271

Conclusion.—A general survey of the appendages throughout the arthropod-
vertebrate stock reveals a steady and logical progress in their specialization. Sen-
sation, feeding, locomotion, respiration, and reproduction are alike essential
functions, but they do not make their local appearance at the same time phylo-
genetically or ontogenetically; or make the same demands for space or for special
locations. Sensory and feeding appendages, for example, must be located near
the mouth, which is the oldest organ of the body, and the first one to be formed.
Locomotor appendages must be located where they can raise and move the primi-
tive head, or in the later phases of evolution, lift the whole body and support

Fic. 176.

pre id. "ipoe "ht. pbc.

pb.c. On. Fig: 178.

Fics. 176 To 178.—A, Hypothetical form in median section, indicating the probable arrangement of organs in
an intermediate condition between that in an arachnid and an ostracoderm; B, median section of an ostracoderm
(Bothriolepis) showing the arrangement of the internal organs; in part, hypothetical; C, Amphioxus, in median
section. Diagrammatic.

it in a properly balanced position. Respiration, circulation, excretion, and repro-
duction make no such imperative demands for special locations or for early
development.

Thus there is established in the appendages, at a very early period, a definite
linear sequence of functions that coincides with the sequence in the historical
evolution of the functional demands made upon them.

In other words, the oldest organs phylogenetically, and those first in demand
ontogenetically, are laid down first in time, and consequently at the head end of the
series, because growth in segmental animals always takes place by a process of
addition at the tail end. Those organs that make no special demand for location
or for prior use, even though they may have an equally long pedigree with the rest,
are gradually relegated to the more recently added territory in the posterior part
of the body.

272 THE OLD MOUTH AND THE NEW.

Fre. 179. Fic. 180.

Fics. 179 AND 180,—Diagrams showing the location of the principal viscera, such as the enteric pouches, coxal
glands, malpighian tubules, lung books and gills, A, Scorpion; B, spider.

Fic, 181. Fic, 182.
Fics. 181 AND 182.—Hypothetical forms leading to the condition in vertebrates,

CONCLUSION. ay3

In accordance with these principles, the linear distribution of functions in the
following order: sensory, feeding, respiratory, and reproductive, becomes very
early established, and thereafter suffers but minor modifications throughout the
entire range of the arthropod-vertebrate series. For example, in the arachnids the
procephalic appendages are mainly sensory, the dicephalic, masticatory, the meso-
cephalic, locomotor, and the metacephalic, respiratory and reproductive. The
boundaries to these divisions are not always sharply defined, and there may be
some overlapping of functions, but not enough to invalidate the general law.

One of the more recent changes in this primitive distribution of functions to
the appendages was the transfer of the locomotor organs to a postcephalic position,
owing largely to the increased number of metameres and the consequent shifting
of the center of balance backward.

18

CHAPTER XV.
VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

The study of variation is an important aid to phylogeny, for with the ever
shifting conditions within and around a center of life, that which is now an occa-
sional phenomenon, or “abnormality,” may under other conditions become a
“normal” or constant result. Thus the abnormal of to-day may have been the
normal of yesterday, or the normal of to-day the abnormal of tomorrow.

The minute variations expressed toward the close of development, and which
at most are only productive of new species, or even genera, are not likely to be
the sources of those fundamental changes which give rise to new classes. In our
problem, therefore, we should consider those early embryonic variations in verte-
brates that are likely to reveal the structure of their remote ancestors; or failing
that, we should seek for embryonic variations in arthropods that might have
produced a vertebrate; for if we know the broad limitations to the range of varia-
tion in a given animal, we may feel a reasonable confidence that we can roughly
define all the principal forms in which the ancestors or the descendants of such
animals could be expressed.

To begin such a study, it is necessary to have an inexhaustible supply of em-
bryonic material that is easy to prepare, easy to observe, and easy to separate the
abnormal from the normal. I know no other animal in which these conditions are
so happily fulfilled asin Limulus. The eggs may be obtained in hundreds of thou-
sands and when properly prepared, the checkerboard arrangement of organs can be
easily observed in their normal and abnormal conditions. ‘The abnormal embryos
may be obtained in great numbers by placing the eggs from many different nests in
running water. In due time, eight to ten weeks, the normal eggs hatch and the
free swimming larve are carried off in the waste. The five or ten per cent. that
remain are apparently sound and healthy, but among them will be found all the
different phases of abnormality likely to occur. There are pygmies and giants,
in early and late stages; some are legless, others headless, or tailess, or consist
of fractional parts, such as halves, quarters and smaller divisions, in endless
combination and variety. Then there are doublets and triplets in various
stages of progressive or regressive growth.

As all the eggs develop under similar conditions, the cause of these various
abnormal forms must be referred not to the unusual environment of a modern
hatching jar, but to variable conditions in the eggs themselves, that were probably
as frequent millions of years ago as they are to-day.

These variations are much greater and more numerous than one might have

274

INVAGINATED APPENDAGES. 275

expected in such an ancient type as Limulus, although there is no reason to believe
that the range of variation in Limulus is exceptional.

Our observations show that there is a very small range in the kind of variation,
for it is of a plus or minus nature in practically all cases. They also show that
the normal forms follow a set course; extreme divergence from it leads to complete
extinction by a process of degeneration that is the reverse of the process of genera-
tion, the various organs disappearing in the same order in which they made their
appearance.

I. INVAGINATED APPENDAGES.

This common abnormality consists in the transformation of the usual
outgrowing appendages, in whole or in part, into ingrowing pockets.

The infolding may take place in the comparatively late stages of its develop-
ment, only the tip of a well developed leg being infolded (Fig. 183, C.); or the entire

Brey

. aga

Fic. 183.—Three Limulus embryos in about the same stage of development (stage G-H) and drawn to the same
scale. They show the variations in the size of the appendages, and of the embryos as a whole; also the varying
extent to which the appendages are infolded. A, All the thoracic appendages are invaginated, except the first and
last pairs; B, the fourth pair completely invaginated; C, the third pair completely invaginated, and the tip of
the fourth appendage of the right side. Camera. :

leg may, from the beginning of its development, grow inward instead of outward)
forming a deep pocket opening outwardly by a transverse slit. (Fig. 183, B.,

Any thoracic appendage, except possibly the first, may be invaginated. Ina
given embyro the infolding may affect one appendage, or a pair, or several append-
ages on one, or on both sides. Infolded legs are found in otherwise normal em-
bryos, or in those presenting other abnormalities; never in the adult.

The conditions under which they occur clearly show that they are in all
probability produced by some special condition within the appendage itself,
not by local pressure, or by any other external cause.

The frequent occurrence of invaginated appendages in Limulus embryos is
an important fact. We may infer that similar “abnormalities” occurred in other
arachnids and for some unknown reason became “fixed” or “ normal,” giving
rise to the infolded abdominal appendages which form the basis of the lung
books. In the tunicates, in Balanoglossus, and in vertebrates, similar respiratory

276 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

pouches or ingrowths occur, but in these cases they have become perforate at their
inner ends, and open into the cephalic diverticula of the alimentary canal.

Il. ASYMMETRY.
It has been shown that in typically segmented animals the organs are arranged

symmetrically, in checkerboard fashion, on either side of a median line. (Fig.
157.) Asymmetry occurs when any of these paired organs differs in form from

Fic. 184.—Limulus embryos of different ages, showing various forms of asymmetry, due either to the absence
of organs usuaily present, or to the presence of extra organs on one side of the median line. A, The right side of
the abdomen and the right half of the last three thoracic metameres, absent. X30 JS, Left half of abdomen
and left chelicera absent; posterior thoracic appendages abnormally small; cam. X30. C, Right half, except
the sixth thoracic appendage, absent; cam. X161/2. D, Stage L. M. (about ready to hatch). Right half of
nerve cord is present but all the other structures of the right side are absent, except traces of third(?) and sixth
thoracic appendages, and the margin of the thoracic and abdominal shield; cam. X30. E, Stage G. H.
There are two lateral eyes and four chelicere on the left. The apex of the third thoracic appendage on the right
is invaginated; cam. X30.

its mate on the opposite side. If this local variation occurs, all the other
parts of the body respond to it by a change in position or form. A common form
of asymmetry is the reduction in size, or the absence of certain organs on one
side of the median line. In such cases the opposite half of the body tends to form
a spiral or circle, with the defective area as its center.

It is generally assumed that the morphological unit of segmented animals
is the metamere or a complete transverse row of organs. But it appears that in
Limulus, and no doubt it is true of other animals also, the right and left halves of a
metamere attain a higher stage of organic unity, are more variable than the meta-
meres themselves, and should be regarded as the true morphological units.

DEGENERATION. 277

Asymmetery is a common abnormality in Limulus and is expressed in a variety
of ways. It is most easily observed in the appendages, but in most cases, appar-
ently, changes in them are accompanied by similar ones in the corresponding half
neuromeres, the somites, and sense organs.

A. Multiple Organs.—Asymmetry due to the presence of extra organs on
one side is very rare. A good illustration is seen in Fig. 184, £., where the first
thoracic half metamere has divided twice, giving rise to two half neuromeres,
two left lateral eyes, and four imperfectly divided left chelicere.

B. Defective Organs——Asymmetry due to the absence, or reduction of ap-
pendages is very common, and apparently occurs as frequently on the right side
as on the left, and as frequently in the thorax as the abdomen. (Fig. 184.) But
half embryos like that in Fig. 184, C., are very rare. Here all the organs on the
right side, except what appears to be the sixth leg, are absent; the left side appears
perfectly normal except for its curvature toward the right.

Asymmetry similar to that seen in Limulus has become a fixed character in
certain groups of arthropods, e.g. hermit crabs and bopyride. The radial symmetry
of the echinoderms was brought about by the loss of one side of the body probably
in some arthropod-like ancestor. The remaining side taking the form of a closed
ring established a successful organic union and laid the foundations for a
new type of radiate structure and a new class of animals. See Chapter
XXIII, p. 421.

III. DEGENERATION.

A. Median Fusion and Antero-posterior Degeneration.—This remark-
able phenomenon is so common, and has been observed in so many different stages,
that there can be no doubt of the manner in which it takes place. The process
starts in the anterior metameres and is taken up by the following ones in numerical
order. In the typical cases, each organ unites with its fellow of the opposite side
to form an unpaired organ, which then disappears. Those nearest the median
line unite first, and after they degenerate those lateral to them unite and degener-
ate in the order of their position, till the whole of the metamere has disappeared.
As the process in orie metamere is always a step in advance of that in the next
posterior metamere, A-shaped embryos are produced showing various stages in
the progress of degeneration. ‘The successive steps are most clearly shown by
the appendages, the dorsal organs, and the nerve cords. ‘The other paired organs
probably fuse and degenerate in the same manner, but their history is not so easily
followed. Toward the close of degeneration we may find, at what was the pos-
terior end of the embryo, either a median row of unpaired organs, or an exhausted
mass of cells, and finally they may in their turn disappear, leaving no trace of the
embryo behind.

278 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

An examination of the different stages of the process (Figs. 185, 189)
shows that as the neuromere disappears, the corresponding appendages approach
each other and unite, fusing at the base first and at the tip last. The large un-
paired leg thus formed first becomes long, slender, and often coiled and twisted;
later, it shortens, becomes smaller and smaller, and finally disappears.

The process of degeneration may be best understood by a consideration of
the normal structure of bilaterally symmetrical animals and the way in which it
is produced. This may be illustrated by a diagrammatic mercator projection of
its superficial organs. (Fig. 192, A.) Here the line, A.P., represents the
cephalo-caudal neural line; each lettered square represents a paired segmental
organ, and each transverse row a metamere. The middle section shows five
body metameres with the typical arrangement of segmental organs, from the
neural series, a.a., to the hemal series, ¢.e.

The apex of the figure, m.A.n., illustrates the progressive elimination of lateral
segmental organs in the head region, and the predominance of the neural ones.
The lower part, £.P.R., shows the order in which the organs arise by apical growth.
In this process we may recognize two distinct factors, or two different kinds of
growth. One gives rise to a longitudinal series of similar metameres, the new ones
always appearing just in front of the apex and behind the-one previously formed.
“The other produces a transverse row of unlike organs, 7.e., neuromere, ganglion,
leg, sense organ, nephridia, heart, etc., extending from the median line outward,
the most highly specialized ones being at the median end of each row.

The relative age of each organ, and its degree of specialization is therefore a
function of its position in relation to these two axes of growth.

Degeneration takes place in the following manner: the most median organs
of the first metamere, a and a, unite to form an unpaired organ, A, which then dis-
appears, followed in the same way by c. d.and e. The same thing takes place in
all the following metameres, the process in the second metamere being one step
ahead of that in the third, and so on.

If the process proceeds till the first two e’s of Fig. 192, A., are united, all the
organs within the area, a.m.A.n.a., will have disappeared, and those that were on
the margins of this area will form a median row of unpaired, unlike organs, E.A.,
arranged from before backward in the reverse order of that on the half metamere.
(Fig. 192, B.) Embryos in which this condition is approximately realized are
shown in Figs. 185 and 189. The condition is shown in diagrammatic form in
Fig. 191.

This mode of degeneration, therefore, takes place according to a definite law,
and creates an entirely new, heretofore unrecognized architectural type. This
type is fleetingly represented in degenerating Limulus embryos, and probably in
many other segmented animals also. The animals in which this condition be-
came established in the adults would form a new class.

* ok ok k ok * * ok *

HOUR-GLASS EMBRYOS. 279

B. Hour-Glass Embryos.—Precisely the same kind of median fusion and
degeneration may appear at other points in the body, forming marked transverse
constrictions, or even complete fission. A common condition is where the con-
striction appears in the middle of the thorax forming the hour-glass embryos, as
in Fig. 189.

Several other minor zones of transverse constrictions may be recognized.
They are formed at the points where a reduction in the size of organs and a tend-

Fic. 185.—Limulus embryos in various stages of degeneration; all drawn to the same scale. The process con-
sists in the union in the median line, and the subsequent degeneration, of the right and left organs of each metamere.
The organs nearest the median line are the first to unite, forming a single extra large organ having the characteristic
features of each member of the pair. The unpaired organ then decreases in size till it completely disappears. In
its place the organs lateral to it, on the same metamere, unite, and in turn degenerate; and so on till the whole
metamere has disappeared. The process begins in the most anterior metameres, and progresses in a cephalo-
caudal direction. In typical cases, as soon as the first unpaired organ formed in, say, the first thoracic metamere,
has disappeared, the same organ is found unpaired in the second metamere; and by the time that has disappeared,
the unpaired condition of that organ obtains in the next following metamere; and so on, till every paired organ has
become median and unpaired, and then disappeared. In the later phases of the process, nothing is left of the
embryo but the mesodermic area and a posterior unpaired process, representing either the last thoracic appendage,
or the tail lobe; and these in turn finally disappear. :

In very rare cases, one of the posterior pair of appendages may-_fuse in the.median line, without.any indication
of fusion in front of that point. But there is no evidence of a progressive median fusion and degeneration extend-
ing toward the anterior end. Camera X30.

ency to undergo median fusion takes place in the adults of other groups of
arthropods. They divide the body more sharply than usual into cephalic lobes,
oral, thoracic, vagal, and abdominal regions. Each of these regions, or tag-
mata, may show traces of degeneration from before backward, independently of
the others, and in the same manner that we have seen in the whole embryo.

It would appear, therefore, that the broad subdivisions of the arthropod body,

280 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

which constitute the very foundation of arthropod morphology, are the varying
results of apical growth, locally checked by median fusion and degeneration.

C. Acephalic and Acaudal Embryos.—A common abnormality consists in
the extensive reduction of the anterior or posterior metameres, or of both, leaving
only the middle portion of the trunk intact. It is not clear whether this result is
brought about by median fusion or not.

It is a common thing to find embryos without the cephalic lobes; or without
cephalic lobes and the first three pairs of thoracic appendages; or the abdomen

Fic. 186.—Limulus embryos in advanced stages of degeneration. A,StageG. The anterior half of the thorax
is absent and the isolated procephalic lobes are reduced to a thin depressed plate, with an underlying mass of yolk
cells, Cam. X30. B,StageG. Anterior half of thorax absent, and the greatly reduced cephalic lobes covered by
a thick fold of ectoderm. Cam. X30. C, Stage G. The abdomen and the anterior half of the thorax absent.
Last three thoracic appendages on the left, reduced to shallow pits; cam. X30. D, Germinal disc, with three un-
paired thoracic appendages; cam. X30. E, Remnants of an embryo, probably in stage G; only the tip of the ab-
domen, or the unpaired remnants of one of the more posterior pairs of appendages, projects above the surface of
the faint embryonic area; cam. X60. F-K, Similar embryos in more advanced stages of degeneration,

alone may be present, without the head and thorax. The most common form con-
sists of little more than the three posterior thoracic metameres. Such embryos
may have a deceptive resemblance to a crustacean nauplius. (Fig. 186, B.)
Such cases as these, and the hour-glass type, show that certain groups of
metameres have an organic unity that enables them to survive, at least for a certain
period, independently of other parts of the body. It suggests the phenomena of
transverse division in the annelids; the remarkable process in cirripeds (Sacculina)
by which the abdomen is cast off, leaving only the thorax to complete the life cycle;

ACEPHALIC AND ACAUDAL EMBRYOS. 281

and the amputation of the head, in larval star-fishes, leaving only the posterior
part to complete its development.

D. Final Stages of Degeneration.—The vast majority of all abnormal
embryos, whether single, doublets, or triplets, continue to degenerate by gradually
cutting off the more anterior segments, or by some modification of the process of
median fusion and antero-posterior degeneration. ‘The details of the final stages
cannot be followed, but the general nature of the process and the final results are
readily observed. In the class of cases we shall now consider, after the disappear-
ance of all the appendages, the embryo may be reduced to a mere pit or sac, yet
preserving certain features, such as concrescing mesodermic areas and protruding
tail lobe, which show clearly the advanced stage of development in which the
whole embryo would have been, had no degeneration taken place. (Fig.
186, J.K.)

Some embryos may consist of two pits, or two groups of cells, like two
primitive cumuli, one corresponding to the head and the other to the tail end of the
body. (Fig. 186, G.H.) Finally these sac-likeremnants are reduced to faint
clouds of scattered cells, or nuclei, which in turn disappear, leaving no trace of
living substance in the yolk.

The conditions we have just described are important in that they give us a
glimpse of the negative processes of life, side by side with the positive ones. They
afford us a new picture of death, unlike the one with which we are most familiar.
In these embryos cell production, cell specialization, and cell decay proceed side
by side, for in every part of the body karyokinetic figures and the fragments of
decaying nuclei are found. The result depends on the relative intensity of these
three factors. ‘The embryos apparently dwindle in size because the death rate
of the cells is greater than the birth rate. Nerve centers, sense organs and ap-
pendages disappear because the specialization of individual cells ceases and only
the simplest kinds remain.

The process of degeneration is never exactly the same, but if completed it
invariably carries the organism back, in the main, over the old lines of progressive
development till it is reduced to its primitive condition, namely, a small community
of similiar, unspecialized cells which disappears with the death of the last survivor.

This may be called the true natural death of an organism, all others are more
or less catastrophic, and are due to the increasing lack of coordination and of ad-
justment to the new conditions that have been created by growth.

IV. DousLEe Empryos.

We may distinguish two kinds of fission, transverse and longitudinal.

1. Transverse fission divides the embryo into anterior and posterior por-
tions, the point where the division most frequently occurs being between the third
and fourth thoracic appendages, or between the abdomen and thorax. The
steps leading up to this form have been described under the preceding sections.

282 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

2. Longitudinal fission is radically different from transverse fission, for
the latter is the result of a local concrescence and degeneration of segmental
organs, while longitudinal fission consists in the formation of two new halves
of an embryo along the median line of one already existing. The formation of
the new halves begins at the anterior end and extends gradually backward. The
old halves are thus thrust apart and each old half, together with the adjacent new
half, makes a new embryo.

Fic. 187.—Limulus embryos, stage H, showing various steps in the formation of double embryos. Double
embryos are formed, in all the observed cases, by the generation, beginning at the anterior end, of two new halves
between the old ones. If there are five paired organs on each segment, and a is median and e lateral, then a will
be the first new organ to appear, and it will appear in the median line of the first segment as an unpaired organ.
It divides, and in its place in the same segment will be found an unpaired organ, like organ b. But at the same
time a new, unpaired organ, like a, will be formed in the median line of segment number two. At the next division,
organ a will be produced in the median line of the third segment, b in the second, and ¢ in the first; organs a and b
being now completely formed in pairs in the first segment, and organs 6 in the second. This process goes on till
two complete new halves are wedged in between the old, and two new individuals are produced, each individual
consisting of an old and a new half.

A, and B, Early stages in the formation of the new halves; cam, X16. C, Later stage;cam. X15. D, The
left-hand embryo has begun to disappear by median fusion and progressive cephalo-caudad degeneration; cam.
X161/2. E, The two embryos have completely separated and the one on the left is disappearing by the char-
acteristic method of degeneration; cam. X16 1/2. F, One embryo normal; the other reduced to a single
appendage, and a narrow embryonic area; cam. X16. Stage H.

This process may be repeated a second time in one of the new embryos, thus
producing three embryos tail to tail, consisting of the two original halves plus
four new ones.

All multiple embryos in Limulus are formed in the above manner, never by the
partial union of embryos originally separate. This is shown by the fact that
in all these cases the embryos match each other exactly, and always in the
same way, which could hardly be the case if two separate embryos had
united through accidental contact.

DOUBLE EMBRYOS. 283

Where do the new halves come from, and by what processes of growth are they
formed? There is no evidence of the existence of special formative material along
the median line where the new parts are forming. This is especially clear when
the process begins at a late period. The old halves are then quite distinct from
the new, and there seems to be no way open to explain the origin of the new half
of a segment by lateral budding, or by regeneration, or by growth from the cor-
responding old one. We might perhaps infer that the new neuromeres in Fig.
187, A.B. come from a kind of regeneration of the old one, but that could not
possibly be the case with any of the new organs lateral to the neuromere, such as
the appendages, sense organs, and the margin of the mesodermic area.

Fic. 188.—Double embryos of Limulus, accompanied by median fusion and cephalo-cauded degeneration;
cam X161/2. ;

A comparison of double embryos in various stages shows that the sequence in
the production of new organs is as follows: The most anterior metameres are
formed first. Each new organ of a metamere first appears as a single organ com-
mon to both embryos and having a normal position for each. Additional organs
are formed in the same way, in the order of their arrangement on the metamere.
For example, the organ nearest the median line is formed first; this then divides
into two, and the one lateral to it appears between them as a single organ common
to both embryos; this divides, and the next one appears in the same place, till
all the organs of a given metamere are formed. (Fig. 187, A.B.) The same
process takes place in the next posterior metamere, but it is always one step be-
hind that in the metamere in front of it.

An embryo that has nearly completed its division, as shown in the diagram
(Fig. 190), presents a row of median unpaired organs which follow the same
order in a cephalic direction that they do in a lateral direction on the metamere,
namely a.b.c.d.e.

The successive eruption of new organs along this median line, and the man-
ner in which they divide and move away from it to right and left, is so entirely
different from what we have been accustomed to see that it is very impressive.

284 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

New organs make their first appearance in the same stage of development
as the corresponding old ones. Each newly formed median appendage first
attains a considerable size, then divides at the apex, the separation gradually
extending toward the base. This, it will be observed, is the exact reverse of what
occurs when degenerating appendages of the right and left sides unite to form a
single median one.

During the later stages of double embryos the growth of the new halves forces
the old ones apart, and the two embryos then swing into a straight line, tail to
tail. (Fig. 187, C.) They may then separate, moving tail first in. opposite
directions till they lie on opposite sides of the egg. (Fig. 187, E.)

At any stage in this process of division, one or both embryos may undergo
the typical median fusion and antero-posterior degeneration. The process may
go on in one embryo quite independently of that in its mate, but always in the
typical manner described for the single embryos. (Figs. 187, 188.)

V. TRIPLE EMBRYOS.

Triple embryos are very rare. Their mode of origin is shown by the accom-
panying diagram. (Fig. 190, B.) It is assumed that in the beginning a single
normal embryo, in the manner already described, gives rise to two embryos, of

Fic, 189.—Triple embryos of Limulus, showing extensive median fusion and cephalo-caudad
degeneration.

A. Of the three embryos in this egg, A is normal and perfect in everything except the abdomen. B has under-
gone median fusion and degeneration, and transverse fission. The cephalic lobes and first four segments have dis-
appeared, except two incompletely fused appendages. The abdomen and the posterior part of the thorax persists.
The latter is bounded in front of the fifth pair of appendages by a great fold that extends completely across the
median line. The nerve-cord in this posterior remnant of an embryo forms a conspicuous, unpaired ridge. Em-
bryo C has undergone extensive fusion and antero-posterior degeneration, nothing remaining but the fused appen-
dages of the sixth segment, and a rudimentary abdomen. It is probable that the original embryo divided length-
wise, giving rise to A and BC, and the latter then divided, giving rise to Band C. Cam. X15.

B, Embryo A has undergone median fusion and transverse fission. The fused appendages of the first four seg-
ments are arranged in a single row. The cephalic lobes are narrowed, and covered by a hood-like fold of ectoderm,
through which one sees the cesophagus. The marginal fold has grown across the median line in front of the fourth
pair of appendages. In front of this fold, and near the median line, are the dorsal organs. Embryo B has degen-
erated completely in front of the fused fifth pair of appendages, with the exception of the dorsal organs, which have
almost reached the median line. In embryo C, the median fusion and degeneration has progressed still farther,

or the dorsal organs have fused and also the six pairs of appendages. At the central ends of all three embryos, are
paired and unpaired ridges, representing abdominal appendages. Mercator projection; cam. X15.

C. A triple embryo in which each individual is reduced to an unpaired dorsal organ, to the last thoracic and
first branchial appendages. There are faint indications of cardiomeres and of caudal segments; cam. X 16 1/2,

TRIPLE EMBRYOS. 285

which one is A, the other occupying the position of B. The right hand embryo
then divides again, forming embryos B. andC. Thus two new generations of
halves are produced, JJ and JJJ, each consisting of an embryo with inverted

B TIT

Fic. 190.—Diagrams illustrating the mode of growth of double and triple embryos.

A, Diagram of a dividing limulus embryo showing the sequence in which the organs, a-e, of the two new halves
are generated. The newly formed, unpaired organs are in capitals; the organs formed by their division are in corre-
sponding small letters. The old halves shaded, new halves unshaded; see also explanation of Fig. 187.

B. Diagram of a triple embryo. First generation of metameres, black and shaded; second, blank; third,
dotted.

right and left sides. The three generations now form a tri-radiate figure, with
the new and old halves making three apparently normal embryos, A. B. and C.
But the halves of the original embryo are now separated by an angle of about

286 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

WA
—
a
— x
E
was) e Uso s
ne e D & x
e e See 5
pe i Cc » 4
gs @
e ex Ny

ef a
efa <o : NO Fi e j
Ol T'@d '
oT (ee)
4 ‘ ers eae
§ . o OS OOS ce Sr
% < ZS RAG e
8 res a e
® >) Ko
% © * Vp y * ° wa
% e
~ ail " ay

Fic. 191.—Diagram of a degenerating limulus embryo, showing the order in which the paired organs unite in
the middle line and then disappear. Organs formed by normal apical growth are represented by small letters;
the unpaired organs formed by their union, and which are about to disappear, are in capitals.

A
afa|N
blafajlolIXN 5
3 Ee
ce | o};,uagal]b je 6
e| D’le
mlalelolaqfelol eld le : 7
ej/@] cfdle
e|/d)}e¢}]bjapqa}lo}]eclde [5 5
e|dle] Bil c|adle
e|/djc|b|]afpfa]b5]ecefd|etleé 9
elalelfof[a]olelalxy
e|d|]c|oblufalo}e]d]e {72 R
NJatefetefelete les
eld}|c|]blaftialbj]eceld]e ls
eloplaqyalole |“
e|d}]c}b] ego] bl ¢}] dje ]9
o]apal b] fp
clotelaloplel ad] fo B
ae Bil w On ee eas
clobpjaftal ble
it p
blwfael] ob] /i2
\ afa|l Az
P

Fic. 192.—Diagram illustrating the law of growth and degeneration of segmented, bilaterally symmetrical
animals.

A. The segmental organs, seen in mercator projection from the neural surface, are represented by letters, and
the metameres by numbers. A-P, The principal, or neural axis; A, cephalic; P, caudal end. A, m.n., area of
initial growth; m.L.R.n, area of multiple growth; L.R.P., area of diminishing growth.

B. The arrangement of organs after the degeneration of the area in figure 4, enclosed by the lines A.m, a.n.4
With the disappearance of this area, the lines m.a." and a.n.’ unite to form the line of unpaired organs E-A,

SUMMARY. 287

240°; and embryo A. consists of a mother and a daughter half; B. of a daughter
and a grand-daughter half, and C. of a granddaughter and a mother half.

Some of the conditions that are actually realized are shown in Fig. 189.
In all these cases, median fusion and degeneration accompanies, or follows the
formation of triplets.

In Fig. 189, A, embryo A. is practically normal; embryo B. has undergone
median fusion and degeneration, almost resulting in transverse fission at the
fourth segment. The abdomen and last two thoracic appendages are practically
normal, while the anterior part of the thorax and cephalic lobes has disappeared,
except one pair of fused appendages. In embryo C. median fusion and degen-
eration have obliterated all but the abdomen and the last pair of fused thoracic
appendages.

In another triplet (Fig. 189, B), embryo A has undergone median fusion and
degeneration, forming a good example of an hour-glass embryo. The same proc-
ess has affected embryo B, entirely obliterating the cephalic lobes and the anterior
portion of the thorax; the dorsal organs, however, are not quite fused in the median
line. But this has taken place in embryo C, and in other respects the degeneration
is carried farther than in B.

In still another triplet (Fig: 189, C), all three embryos are reduced by ancero-
posterior fusion and degeneration nearly to the same level; each one retains an
unpaired sixth thoracic appendage, a remnant of the abdomen, and an unpaired
dorsal organ.

Multiple embryos, therefore, are formed by the appearance of new halves
between the old, the various organs being formed in a definite and orderly manner.
After a time degeneration begins, the organs disappearing by a method and in an
order that are the reverse of those in which they were generated.

VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

1. The variations here described are primarily due to structural variations
resident in the ovum, and not to differences in the environment.

2. There is a great difference in the growth rate, under apparently the same
conditions.

3. There is a great difference in size, some embryos of the same stage being
much larger than others.

4. Certain organs or regions of the body may be entirely absent, and are not
subsequently restored.

5. When organs disappear it is usually by median fusion and degeneration,
in the reverse order of their age and specialization.

6. Multiple embryos are produced by the formation of new halves between
the old, the process beginning at the head end. The new organs are produced in
the reverse order to that in which they are formed by normal apical growth, that is,
the lateral ones before the median ones. The arrangement is also reversed, the

288 VARIATION AND MONSTROSITIES.

hemal organs lying in the axis of growth and the neural ones on the margins.
The way in which the new organs make their appearance is the reverse of that
by which organs disappear by median fusion and degeneration.

7. Multiple embryos thus formed disappear again by median fusion and
anteroposterior degeneration.

8. Variation in Limulus is primarily of a plus or minus nature. The endless
variety of results attained is due to the presence of a larger or smaller number of
organs. We are apparently always dealing with the same things and with the
same kind of stuff. When an unusual form of the aggregate appears, as in the
semicircular form of a half embryo, it is the indirect result of the absence of some
other part. In no case does a new organ or a new part appear that is different in
kind from those already existing; in no case is an organ out of place in reference to
others; in all cases the organs come and go in a definite orderly sequence.

The organs of the embryo, crystal-like, are always expressed in approximately
the same forms and in similar geometrical aggregates. The successive steps in
apical growth, in degeneration, in twin formation, and again in degeneration, are
minutely graded transitional phases in which the living substance in the egg of
Limulus finds formal expression.

g. The parallel rise and fall, or the opening and closing of the checker-board
pattern, is a fundamental attribute of organic growth, and is a basic factor in the
morphogenesis of all segmented animals. The laws of differential apical growth,
and of the reverse process, or degeneration, are the keys to their morphology,
accounting for their bodily subdivisions, and for the unequal growth, specializa-
tion, and union of their various organs.

CHAPTER XVI.
THE DERMAL SKELETON.

We recognize four distinct structures in the skeleton of primitive vertebrates:
1. The dermal skeleton, consisting of bony plates more or less intimately united
to form a continuous external armor for the head and trunk; 2. the primordial
endocranium, consisting of a broad unsegmented plate of fibrocartilage lying on
the hemal side of the brain; 3. the gill-bars, segmentally arranged cartilage bars
lying in the visceral arches; 4. the notochord; 5. neural arches, segmentally ar-
ranged blocks, or half-rings of cartilage distributed along the sides of the nerve
cord and notochord. These structures differ from one another in their chemical
and histological composition, and in their origin. The general trend in the evolu-
tion of the vertebrate skeleton is toward the elimination of the two oldest constitu-
ents, the dermal skeleton and the notochord, and the union of the remaining
elements, without distinction of origin, structure, or previous function, into a
common axial skeleton.

These five sets of skeletal structures are already established in the arachnids,
viz: 1. The external chitenous armor with its primordial canaliculi and lacune.
2. the fibrocartilaginous endocranium or plastron; 3. the cartilaginous bars
supporting the branchial appendages; 4. the middle cord, or lemmatochord,
and 5. the segmentally arranged cartilages over the spinal cord. Nothing re-
sembling this assemblage of skeletogenous tissues is found in any other animals
outside the vertebrates and arachnids.

I. THr DERMAL SKELETON OF VERTEBRATES.

The dermal skeleton of primitive vertebrates consists of a series of bony
plates, not preformed in cartilage, arising in or beneath the epidermis. It has
been generally assumed that the most primitive dermal skeleton is one consisting
of small isolated placoid scales, similar to those in the elasmobranchs; and that
the larger plates seen in the ganoids, dipnoi, and ostracoderms were formed by
the secondary union of such scales. This assumption is based on the prevalent
belief that the elasmobranchs and cyclostomes are the most primitive vertebrates,
and that the above mentioned heavily armored forms were derived from them.
This view is untenable, since it takes no account of the fact that the ostracoderms,
which are the oldest known, and the most primitive fish-like vertebrates, were pre-
eminently heavily armored forms.

We shall reverse the usual way of approaching this question and start with the
assumption that the most primitive vertebrate dermal armor is like that of the

19 289

290 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

ostracoderms, and consists of a practically continuous bony envelop for the head
and gill region, with segmentally arranged plates, loosely articulated, covering the
joints of the trunk and tail. Such an exoskeleton resembles that of the marine
arachnids, the hypothetical ancestors of the vertebrates.

It is assumed that the cephalic buckler of the ostracoderms corresponds to the
cephalothoracic shield of the merostomes and arachnids generally, 7.e., the primi-
tive head, the first six thoracic, and the vagus segments. The buckler of such
forms as Pteraspis, Tremataspis and Bothriolepis also includes the abdominal or
respiratory segments.

The line of union between the thoracic and branchial regions is clearly indi-
cated in Bothriolepis by the hinge-like joint separating the cephalic buckler from
the respiratory chamber. (Fig. 247.) Just in front of this joint are two pores
leading into the interior of the shell. Two similar pores are found in Tremataspis
(Fig. 236), and just back of these pores is probably the dividing line between the
cephalic and branchial regions in these animals.

In Cephalaspis and Tremataspis, the trunk region is covered with segmentally
arranged dermal plates corresponding with the plates covering the neural surface
of the post-branchial region in arthropods. Only a few of the more anterior
segmental plates of the ostracoderms are represented in the arthropods, the more
posterior ones being new formations added after the separation of the vertebrate
from the arthropod stock had taken place.

In Bothriolepsis, and in a small undescribed species of Cephalaspis from
Dalhousie (Fig. 234), the trunk and tail are naked, save for a few minute, irregu-
larly distributed ossicles near the anterior end of the trunk.

In Pterichthys and Pteraspis, the trunk appears to have been covered with
rounded or polygonal scales, probably formed by the breaking up of larger seg-
mental scales like those of Trematapsis.

The Minute Structure of the Dermal Bones of the Ostracoderms.

The structure of the dermal bones of Tremataspis, Pteraspis, and Bothriolepis
has been studied with special care, and some observations were made on the
dermal skeleton of Cephalaspis and Tolypaspis, but they are incomplete, owing to
the lack of adequate material.

It is surprising how beautifully the details of the minute structure of these
ancient fish bones is preserved. When properly prepared, the color and the
minutest details may occasionally be seen as clearly as though the animals had
been dead a few weeks only, instead of a few million years.

.

Tremataspis.

In Tremataspis the outer surface of the shell generally has a light yellowish-
brown color. It is beautifully polished and under the lens appears to be orna-
mented with low winding ridges and mounds, similar to those of Bothriolepis,

TREMATASPIS. 291

but much fainter. The surface is dotted with minute circular openings arranged
in irregular rows that usually correspond with the meshes of the underlying canals.

The shell is about o.3 mm. thick. The inner portion consists of horizontal
lamellz of uniform width. interrrupted by large irregular chambers. (Fig. 193.)
The lamelle appear to have consisted originally of fibrous strands arranged with

Fic. 193.—Cross-section of the exoskeleton of Tremataspis.

great regularity into parallel bundles, those in adjacent lavers running at right
angles to one another. Viewed from the inner surface of the shell the strands of
the lamelle look like the warp and woof of a coarse cloth (Fig. 194). Between
the lavers are flattened lacunz, sometimes filled with a reddish-brown substance
that gives them a very striking resemblance to living pigment cells. Canaliculi

Fic. 194.—Exoskeleton of Tremataspis, seen from the inner surface. Enough of the outer surface has been removed
to make the remainder semi-transparent.

radiate from the lacunz and anastomose with those in the lavers of bone above
and below.

The substance of the shell is penetrated by two sets of canals. The deeper
set forms a horizontal meshwork of uniform caliber, opening to the outer surface
at frequent intervals by short conical chimnevs. (Fig. 193, sv.c.) This system
of canals is generally filled with a peculiar matrix that is either colorless and similar

292 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

to that outside the shell, or impregnated with a dark red or black substance. The
walls of these canals, which appear to have contained sense organs and mucous
glands, are very sharply defined. Bone lacune do not open into them, and they
lead only at irregular intervals, if at all, into the other system of canals, or into the
cancella. They appear to be uniformly distributed in the shell, throughout all
parts of the buckler. When the outermost layers are removed and the shell is
viewed as a semi-transparent object from its inner surface, the sensory canals are
seen to overlie the partition separating the cancelle. (Fig. 194.)

The canals belonging to the outer set are smaller and much fainter than the
ones just described, and never contain pigment, or foreign materials derived from
the surrounding matrix. They form a horizontal polygonal mesh network of
slender irregular vascular canals, v.c., that open by larger ones into the summit of
the cancelle, ¢, and hence through the floor of the cancelle into the interior, 7.p.

Ve. A ve exp. rake

Fic. 195.—A, Tangential section of the outer layers of the exoskeleton of Tremataspis; B, outermost layer, in sur-

face view, more highly magnified; C, same in cross-section.
Several strands of the arching horizontal canals lead into irregular spaces lying in
the center of the areas enclosed by the chimney pores. From the floor of these
spaces, numerous irregularly looped canals arise that project inward, forming ill-
defined tufts of vascular canals (Fig. 195, v.c.), on about the same level with the
large sensory canals. Some of these canals appear to open occasionally into the
floor of the sensory canals.

From the roof and sides of all the outermost vascular canals, and from their
points of union with one another, arise numerous tapering vertical canals, the
osteo-dentinal canals. They are larger than the ordinary canaliculi, especially
at their proximal ends, and after expanding into a row of three or four overlying
lacunz, open into innumerable anastomosing canalicule. The main axial canal
terminates in a single minute canaliculus, that runs through a faintly defined
cylinder to the outer surface. (Figs. 193, 195, ¢.)

The layer of prisms with their axial pore canals make up the glassy outer
surface of the shell; the layer of osteo-dentinal canals forms the dentinal layer.

The bone cells, or lacune, lying in the spaces between the vascular and sen-
sory canals are smaller than the ones just described and are more like the typical
bone lacune. They appear to lie between the concentric bone lamella surround-
ing the canals.

DERMAL SKELETON OF PTERASPIS. 293

Pteraspis.

Of the genus Pteraspis only a part of the cephalic armor and a few scale-like
structures belonging to the anterior part of the trunk are known.

The boat-shaped dorsal shield (Fig. 245), is composed of seven portions,
marked off on the outer surface of the shield by furrows, and on the inner surface
by ridges. In young specimens the rostrum and the central disc may be found
separately. In each piece the ornamental surface ridges and furrows, which look
much like the wavy lines on the finger tips, are arranged in concentric lines parallel
with its margins. This fact, together with other considerations, led Lankester to

Fic, 196.—A, Cross-section of the shield of Pteraspis, at right angles to the surface ridges; B, Tangential section
through the outer layers, and nearly parallel with the outer surface.

believe that each piece ossified from a separate center, and that their complete
anchylosis occurred only in the adult.

Along the lateral margins of the shield, in the rostrum, and near the posterior
dorsal spine, the shell is greatly thickened, and consists of a network of bony tra-
becule with irregular spaces between. In the median portions it is of a more
uniform thickness, about 0.6 to 0.8 mm.

In sections across the ridges (Fig. 196, A), the shell is seen to consist of four
principal layers: 1. A thick inner wall, 0.J., composed of many parallel layers of
uniform thickness, perforated here and there by openings that lead from the interior
of the head into the overlying cancellousspaces. 2. Acancellated layer, c.l., consist-
ing of polygonal chambers, c., separated by thin vertical walls that are perforated
here and there by narrow lateral passages. 3. Three or four layers of canals,
v.l., each layer forming a close four-sided meshwork from which vertical canals

2904 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

connect with the layer above and below. The diameter of the canals in the inner
layer is the largest and the main canals of this layer run at right angles to the sur-
face ridges. (Fig. 196,B.) The diameter of the canals in the several layers dimin-
ishes toward the outer surface; at the same time the apparent trend of the main
canals of a layer gradually shifts, so that in the outermost one the main horizontal
canals run parallel with the surface ridges, one canal running lengthwise along the
basal portion of each ridge. In sections parallel to the outer surface as well as in
cross-section, it is readily seen that each ridge canal opens right and left into the
bottom of the grooves, s.c., between the ridges, and at pretty regular intervals sends
a short loop upward into the ridge itself, c.ca. From the summit of these ridge-

Fie. 197. Fig, 198.
Fic. 197.—Cross-section of a small portion of a shield especially well preserved, and probably belonging to
Pteraspis; highly magnified, showing the axial core and the sharply laminated structure of the trabecule.
Fic. 198.—Trabecule of Ateleaspis.

loops arise the radiating dentinal canals of the ridges. These terminal canals
resemble those of Tremataspis, but they do not contain any lacuna-like dilatations.
4. The layer of surface ridges and the intervening grooves form the fourth or
outer layer of the shield.

The substance of the shell consists of a series of plates and trabecule; the
cut surfaces of the latter present a very distinct concentric lamination that is
precisely like the laminated trabeculz in Limulus. In each plate or bar there is
an axial core of a darker, yellowish-brown color; it is also distinguished by a
change in the distinctness of the lamination. The outermost lamine are crossed
by innumerable fine lines that produce the appearance shown in Fig. 197. In
other specimens that have been preserved in a little different manner, some
of the canals are filled with air so that they become very distinct, like the pore
canals of Limulus, or the air-filled canaliculi of typical bone cells.

These canaliculi begin at the surface of the trabeculi and extend at right angles to
the lamella into the axial core. There they bend nearly at right angles and some
of them terminate in slender, spindle-shaped, or elongated dilatations, the long
axis of which generally lies parallel with the long axis of the core. These terminal
dilations or primitive lacune are readily seen with a magnification of about 600

ATELEASPIS. 295

diameters. The same kind of unbranched canaliculi aféd terminal lacune are
seen, often with great distinctness, in the basal layers. (Fig. 196, Al.)

It has been generally assumed that in the pteraspids true lacune are absent.
It will be seen from the above account that they possess a primitive form of lacune
that are similar to those in Limulus. They differ from typical bone lacunz in
their small size and in the absence of radiating canaliculi.

Ateleaspis.

In a specimen of Ateleaspis from Scaumenac Bay (Fig. 198), the shell in
tangential sections forms a continuous network of trabeculae. They are not as

Fic. 199.—A. Surface ornamentation of the thoracic shield of Limulus, near the lateraleyes. B. Same on the
hzmal surface of one of the cornua. C. Cross-section of one of the cornua,

Fic. 200.—A, Surface view of semi-transparent exoskeleton of Limulus, from the flexible portion in the
olfactory region. It shows the peculiar groups of pore canals, lyng just below the surface, and radiating from the
base of the denticle-like spines; also the polygonal network of low ridges, or trabecule, projecting from the
inner surface of the exoskeleton. B, Surface view of thoracic shield of an ostracoderm (Ateleaspis, sp?) showing
the polygonal areas, surface tubercles, and the peculiar grouping of canals lying just below the surface. C, Surface
ornamentation from the hzmal surface of thoracic shield of Limulus. D, Same, more highly magnified.

distinctly laminated as in Pteraspis, although there is a dark brown axial core in
which most of the lacune are located. The lacune are spindle-shaped, with

more than one canaliculus, some of which can be traced to the outer surface of the
trabecule.

296 THE DERMAL SKELETON.
II. DERMAL SKELETON OF LIMULUS.

We shall describe in some detail the dermal skeleton of Limulus because it
has the usual arthropod characters, and at the same time several other very im-
portant ones that are not found in any other animal, so far as I know, outside the
vertebrates.

The outer surface of the shell of half grown Limuli (Fig. 199, B.) is marked
by broad zig-zag ridges separated by shallow grooves. In some places, notably

Fic. 201.—Dermal skeleton of Limulus. A, Cross-section through the posterior median portion of the thoracic
shield; 8, through the pineal eye chamber; C, surface view of the trioculate parietal eye; D, bony trabecule
on the inner surface of the shield, in the lateral eye region; , Cross-section of the lateral eye chamber.

in the region about the lateral eyes, the ridges break up into polygonal areas,
each of which contains a crater-like depression with radiating grooves extending
toward the base of the cone, Fig. 200, D. The distinctness of the ornamentation
is accentuated by the deeper color and other optical properties of the matrix in
the grooves and craters; but the same figures can be obtained in wax impressions
of the outer surface, except that they are fainter.

Fic. 202,—A, Inside margin of the thoracic shield, showing the mode of growth of the trabecule; B, mass of bony
trabecule from the inner surface of the thoracic shield.

The inner surface of the shell at certain places gives rise to great masses of
interwoven chitenous bars, or trabecule, separated by irregular spaces filled
with loose connective tissue, blood-vessels and nerves. (Figs. 203, 204.)

The bars are concentrically laminated and contain numerous fine canals and
spindle-shaped cavities, so that the whole mass of tissue resembles in a very
striking way the cancellous bony tissue of vetebrates.

LIMULUS. 297

The trabecule ane most highly developed along the lateral margins of the
thoracic and branchial shields, and in the cornua. In these places the spaces
between the dorsal and ventral walls are filled with dense masses of this tissue.
(Fig. 199 C.) In the cornua the trabecular network of each wall is united to the
other by long columns with branching ends. (Fig. 199, C.)

In the margins of the thoracic shield (Fig. 202, A) one sees how the new
trabecule arise at separate points, unite, and later form new supports which
gradually lift the older bars off the surface.

Fic. 203.—Section of the dermal skeleton of Limulus, tangential to the surface, showing the cancellous spaces,
and the axial location of the lacune in the trabecule. Margin of thoracic shield.

There are similar deposits of this tissue under the lateral eyes, enclosing each
eye within a bony orbit (Fig. 201, D, EZ), another beneath the median eyes (Fig. 201,
B), and six or seven pairs of irregular patches arranged symetrically on the dorsal
wall of the abdomen along the median margin of the six pairs of entapophyses.
(Fig. 205.)

Fic. 204.—Cross-section of the dermal skeleton of Limulus. Margin of thoracic shield.

Minute Structure.—The chitenous trabecule often form a nearly continuous
sheet spread out over the inner surface of the shell, and differing from it to a very
marked degree, in color, texture, and general appearance. (Figs. 201, A and 204.)

The shell, in such places, is divided into several layers:

1. The outer layer is strongly laminated, and traversed by two or three kinds
of rather large canals, which contain ducts of mucous glands, or nerve fibers, and
other tissue. All these canals reach the outer surface, and either open freely to
the exterior, or lead into spines or hairs of various shapes. Between them are

298 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

innumerable canalicule (pore canals of authors). They are extremely minute and
extend in straight lines or in finely wound spirals almost to the outer surface, p.c.
The most superficial layer, e, is thin, colorless, vitreous, and devoid of canaliculi.
Although very hard and polished, it is easily destroyed under some conditions.
In surface views it is seen to be divided by shallow grooves into polygonal facets
or zigzag ridges. (Fig. 200; D.)

2. The middle layer consists of broad cancellous spaces separated by, ir-
regular vertical partitions. The cancelle are filled with loose connective tissue,
through which ramify nerves and blood-vessels.

3. The third, or inner, layer is composed of trabecule arranged parallel to
the outer surface. It is horizontally laminated, and is pierced with large irregular
openings, through which nerves and blood-vessels pass to the cancellated layer.

Each bar, or trabecula, is covered by a thin layer of pigmented ectoderm
continuous with that underlying the outer layer, and that secretes, or produces
by the periodic transformation of its own substance, the chitenous lamella of the
shell. The lamelle are generally grouped in bands which differ in their color
and in their chemical reaction. The older, outer layers of the shield are dark
brown, and a band of this colored chiten extends into the axis of each trabecula.
The deeper lamella of the outer layer, and the outer lamell of the trabecule,
are transparent and nearly colorless.

The axial core of the trabecule stains deeply in hematoxylin and in acetic
acid carmine, the outer layers remaining colorless. This fact is important, as it
indicates some preliminary chemical change in the axis of the bars, where the
bone cells later appear.

In the oldest crabs, the axis of each bar is densely crowded with spindle-
shaped cavities, or lacune. Their long axes are parallel to the long axis of the
bar, and, under favorable conditions, we can see that many of them are connected
at one end with a very fine tubule, or canaliculus, which runs radially toward the
periphery. Thelargest lacune arenearest thecenter of the trabecule. (Fig. 206, A.)

If a section of the bone is dried in the air and then mounted in balsam or
glycerine, the lacune and canaliculi appear black in transmitted light, and
silvery-white in reflected light, showing that by the drying up of their semi-fluid
contents they have become filled with air. Old fragments of bone that have
dried in the sun for an indefinite period, when softened and sectioned, show the
same structure. Caustic potash dissolves the granular contents of the lacune,
but does not otherwise affect them.

Stained sections, quickly transferred to balsam, have many of the lacune
and canaliculi injected with the stain, which generally disappears when the sec-
tions are well washed. But even after long washing with acidulated alcohol,
some of the larger lacune show a characteristic color due to the presence of a
faintly stained granular substance, and a small darker colored body.

All these facts show that we are dealing with actual cavities and canals in
the chiten, some of which are filled with nucleated protoplasm.

LIMULUS. 299

The lacunz are best seen in old crabs where several trabecule unite. Atsuch
points they are very numerous and apparently vary a good dealin shape. (Fig.
206, B.) This is largely due to the fact that they are turned in various directions,

Fic. 205.—Inner surface of the shield of Limulus, showing the muscle markings and the distribution of the
bony trabecule, the entapophyses, and the principal muscle markings.

so that some are cut crosswise, others lengthwise. The lacune are usually filled
with air and appear jet black. As the canaliculi enter the darker axial core
(Fig. 206, B.a.b.), they become sinuous, and many side branches arise which
terminate in minute\lacune. Some of the latter appear to increase in size and

300 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

to separate from the main canal, ultimately opening directly to the exterior
by a single canaliculus.
At d, large elongated lacunz are seen, some of thém constricted transversely

Fic. 206.— Section of bony trabeculz from the shield of an old Limuius, showing the shape and arrangement of the
lacune and canaliculi; highly magnified.

Fic. 207.—A, Section of the chitenous investment of the cesophagus of Limulus, showing the deeply stained
chains of spindle-shaped bodies between the chitenous lamella. Delafield’s haematoxylin. B, Section of the
flexible chiten in the olfactory region, showing the minute, deeply stained, nuclear-like bodies in the pire canals.
Hematoxylin.

as though about to form several smaller lacune, although this appearance is not
as common as the branched one described above. At e, are a few lacune belong-
ing to a trabecula running at right angles to the plane of the paper.

LIMULUS. 301

The dermal bone tissue varies considerably in extent in different individuals.
It is not visible in specimens less than eight inches long and probably does not
make its appearance till the animal is full grown. Even when it is largely devel-
oped, the characteristic lacune in the chitenous bars may be absent. This
shows, I believe, that the lacune are not fully developed till long after maturity
is reached, for it was in the very oldest individuals, with much scarred and worn
armor, that I found them best developed.

It is difficult to determine how the nuclei get into the lacune. They appear
to migrate into them from the surface epithelium through the canaliculi. The
following observations lend some support to this view. In the region of the ol-
factory organ, the chiten is soft and flexible and the bone cells are absent. When
stained with the ordinary nuclear stains, the whole thickness of the wall is seen to
be filled with minute sharply stained, nuclear-like bodies of uniform size, arranged
with considerable regularity in the pore canals. (Fig. 207, B.)

In sections of the adult oesophagus (Fig. 207, A), the chiten is seen to be filled
with bodies that also take a nuclear stain. Here they are of varying sizes; some
are minute dots, others much larger, and spindle-shaped, and arranged in rows that
follow the undulations of the lamella. The rows of spindle-shaped, or bead-
like bodies are often united by delicate threads, as though they had multiplied
by division and were still imperfectly separated from each other.

It is possible that some of these bodies are bacteria, or the spores of a parasitic
fungus, or the products of some degenerative process. Thatis a point upon which
I have not been able to satisfy myself, one way or the other. It is certain that a
species of fungus, Macrocystis, does grow in the chiten of Limulus. Fragments
of the skin, stained with methylene blue, often show the deeply stained hyphe
ramifying in all directions through the substance of the chitenous covering of the
gills, or in the chiten surrounding the olfactory organ. They appear to dissolve
out channels in the chiten, which are then completely filled by the growing
hyphe. The characteristic spores of Macrocystis have been found in abundance
on the outer surface of the chiten in the olfactory region of dried shells. There is,
however, no suggestion of any connection between this fungus and the nuclear
bodies just described.

* * * * * * * * *

The continuous external armor of arthropods must be shed at regular inter-
vals, to make. room for growth, and the shedding of the old shell is always a diffi-
cult and dangerous process. In Limulus we see the beginning of a new type of
exoskeleton, one that is subdermal and discontinuous, that need not be, and never
is cast off after it isonceformed. Indeed, Limulus could no more shed its dermal
bones than a vertebrate could shed its cartilage cranium or its vertebral column.
Limulus has therefore solved the problem for arthropods, of getting rid of an
impractical external covering, a covering which has become too cumbersome
and too impermeable for physiological purposes, which prohibits growth if

302 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

retained, and which it is a menace to remove. In its place, it is producing an
armor that is permeable, capable of indefinite expansion, and one that cannot,
and need not, be shed at frequent intervals.

The new conditions under which this skeleton is developed, and especially
its permanent retention within the foreign mesodermic tissues, were no doubt im-
portant factors in bringing about a permanent change in its chemical compo-
sition.

III. Summary AND COMPARISON.

J. We have shown that Limulus possesses a remarkable dermal skeleton, and
that in either coarse or minute structure there is nothing resembling it known in
any other invertebrate. The nearest approach to it is found in the pteraspidian
division of the ostracoderms. No other known animal, vertebrate or invertebrate,
resembles Pteraspis in the structure of its exoskeleton so closely as Limulus. If
Limulus were an extinct animal, it would be exceedingly difficult to discover any
differences between the minute structure of its deeper lying exoskeleton and
that of Pteraspis.

II. The surface ornamentation of the exoskeleton of the ostracoderms may
be resolved into a series of alternating ridges and grooves that are either very
uniform in size and nearly parallel, as in Pteraspis; or sinuous and with a tendency
to break up into rows of tubercles, as in Bothriolepis; or finally forming tubercu-
late polygonal areas, as in Cephalaspis.

III. The outer surface is also marked by a special series of shallow grooves
in Bothriolepis (Fig. 247), Ateleaspis (Fig. 242), and Tremataspis (Fig. 236), that
probably mark the location of rows of sensory organs.

Another set of deep lying canals, probably representing enclosed surface
grooves, are present in Pteraspis and Tremataspis. They are of even caliber and
open outward by narrow slits, or pores, or by very short, chimney-like canals,
(Figs. 193, 196, s.c.) that probably contained sensory organs or mucous glands.
They differ from the vascular canals in that they are generally filled with a matrix
like that outside the shell, showing that they communicated freely with the out-
side, while the vascular canals and even the cancelle, may be quite empty.

IV. The surface ornamentation of the exoskeleton of the ostracoderms
may be regarded as a further specialization of the ridges and grooves seen on the
outer surface of the exoskeleton in the marine arachnids. It would require but
a slight modification of the scale-like markings in Pterygotus, or of the zigzag
ridges and grooves, or the polygonal areas, in Limulus, to produce the character-
istic markings of Pteraspis, Bothriolepis, or Cephalaspis.

V. The surface ornamentation of the cephalic buckler in both arachnids and
ostracoderms may be regarded as the external expression of internal irregulari-
ties in growth which ultimately lead to the breaking up of the continuous shell into
separate plates.

SUMMARY. 303

VI. From a vertebrate standpoint, the continuous dermal armor of the ostra-
coderms appears to be a very primitive exoskeleton, and one from which that
of the true fishes has been produced by breaking up the surface ornamentation
into isolated dermal denticles and bony plates. From the invertebrate stand-
point, the ostracoderm skeleton is a highly specialized one, produced by an exag-
geration of the type of exoskeleton seen in Limulus.

VII. It may be urged that the bony plates of the ostracoderms are meso-
dermal in origin, while those of Limulus are epidermal. But we have no means
of knowing whether the bony plates of the ostracoderms were developed entirely
inside, or outside the ectoderm, and we cannot class them as subdermal, or
mesodermal, unless we beg the whole question and assume that the ostracoderms
are typical fishes.

VIII. The structure of the exoskeleton of the ostracoderms is as much like
that of Limulus as that of vertebrates. The dermal skeleton of vertebrates can
be derived as readily from that of Limulus as from that of the ostracoderms.
To do this, for example, we need only to assume that the outer layer of the shell
of Limulus has been reduced to a thin cuticular layer and is cut off entirely from
the underlying trabecule. The skin and the skeletal parts derived from it would
then appear to be formed of two layers, a continuous outer layer, and an inner
one composed of more or less isolated fragments formed by local ingrowths from
the outer layer.

The two kinds of exoskeleton, epidermal and subdermal, would then be.
present at the same time, as indeed they are in Limulus. But in Limulus the sub-
dermal skeleton is in its initial stages, and the epidermal is the more voluminous.
In primitive vertebrates the epidermal skeleton is about to disappear, being repre-
sented solely by the enamel layer, and possibly the dentine, while the subdermal
layer has attained its maximum development. The distinction between the
epidermal skeleton of the arachnids, and the dermal one in vertebrates is, therefore,
only one of degree, not of kind.

In the embryonic development of dermal bones in vertebrates, the arachnid
process of separating bony trabecule from the inner surface of the ectoderm is
apparently greatly abbreviated, but indications of it have been observed in the
development of certain cranial bones. These observations, therefore, need not
be looked upon with suspicion, or, if accepted, taken as evidence of the untrust-
worthiness of the germ layer theories. They should be regarded rather as the
naturally to be expected embryological indication of the derivation of the verte-
brate dermal skeleton from the epidermal armor of arachnid ancestors.

IX. The dermal denticles are the oldest parts of the dermal skeleton of verte-
brates, and they naturally still retain the clearest indications of their derivation
from an arthropod exoskeleton.

The chiten of arachnids, and the enamel and dentine of the dermal bones of
primitive vertebrates have essentially the same structure and mode of growth, as
shown by their pronounced lamine and the minute parallel canals that run at

304 THE DERMAL SKELETON.

right angles to them. The differences are mainly ones of degree, i.e., the number
and size of the canals, and the density and composition of the matrix.

ie
i H

I

) Us

WWE
aa
Se

Li

.

Fic. 208—Semi-diagrammatic sections illustrating the evolution of the chitenous epidermal exoskeleton of arach-
nids into the bony sub-dermal exoskeleton of vertebrates. A, Exoskeleton of immature Limulus showing the begin-
ning of the trabecular ingrowths; B, mature Limulus, showing the cancellated exoskeleton; the trabeculae, with

’ their axial lacune; and the dentine-like chitenous matrix, with its parallel pore canals and concentric lamelle; C,
, the exoskeleton of an ostracoderm, consisting of dentinal, vascular, cancellous, and basal layers. Inthe outer layer
“are shown several forms of tubercles, denticles, and dentinal ridges, with various forms of dentinal canals; D, the

final stages showing the conversion of the vascular, cancellous, and basal layers into subdermal bone; and the con-
version of the isolated remnants of the primitive epidermal skeleton, into dermal denticles.

When two such similar structures as enamel and dentine appear to arise, one
from the mesoderm, the other from the ectoderm, it probably means that either

SUMMARY. 305

there is no real distinction between the two layers, or else that both structures arise
from the same layer. As there is no doubt about the origin of the enamel layer,
and as there is no conclusive evidence that the odontoblasts have not arisen at a
very early period from the ectoderm, it may be assumed that both enamel cells and
odontoblasts were primarily derived from the ectoderm.

We may, therefore, regard the dermal skeleton of primitive vertebrates as
consisting of two parts, viz. 1. the subdermal trabecule that develop into the char-
acteristic bony plates, and that consist of concentric lamelle, true bone corpuscles,
and vascular chambers, or canals; and 2. the more superficial skeleton, that arises
either from the outer surface of the ectoderm, or from cells in intimate relation
with it, and that consists of parts having a chitenoid, enamel-like, or dentine-like
structure.

X. The general nature of the process by which the continuous epidermal
armor of the arachnids becomes fragmented and divided into two overlying
systems, and the method of substituting the inner system for the outer, is shown in
a diagrammatic way in Fig. 208.

The ostracoderm skeleton, C, clearly represents a transitional stage between
the vertebrate and the arachnid type. In the vertebrates themselves, the principal
events in the evolution of the dermal skeleton are the gradual elimination of the
epidermal structures, except those retained in the teeth; the reduction of the sub-
dermal bones to relative insignificance; and the substitution for them of an endo-
skeleton of true mesodermal origin.

CHAPTER XVII.
THE ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

I. THe ENDOSKELETON OF ARACHNIDS.

Many arthropods are provided with an elaborate system of ectodermic in-
foldings, lined with chiten, that serve for the attachment of muscles and in some
cases as a supporting framework for the anterior part of the nervous system.
They may be segmentally arranged, and in some cases appear to be the modified
remains of duct-like infoldings that originally served some other purpose than for
the attachment of muscles. There are no indications that these structures are
represented in vertebrates, and we merely refer to them here in order to emphasize
the distinction between them and the true endoskeleton we shall describe in the
following pages.

The endoskeleton of arachnids (Limulus) consists of four distinct parts, their
relation to the corresponding parts in the vertebrate skeleton being sufficiently
indicated by their names. They are: a. the neural arches; 0. the branchial car-
tilages; c. the endocranium; d. the notochord. (Fig. 209.)

Fic. 209.—Diagram of the endoskeleton of a marine arachnid (based on Limulus) showing the locations of the
lemmatochord, endocranium, neural arches (dotted), branchial cartilages (black), and the chitenous entapophyses
(shaded).

With the exception of the notochord, these structures are primarily meso-
dermic in origin; they serve for the attachment of muscles, and with the possible
exception of the branchial cartilages, their origin and development was determined
by the development of the muscles now associated with them. They have the
same general form, location, consistency, and chemical reaction that the corre-
sponding cartilages have in vertebrates.

The arthropod notochord is a modification of the middle cord and is primar-
ily ectodermic in origin. The median nerve derived from it degenerates and the
remnants become invested with a thick envelop of neuroglia-like tissue that may

306

NEURAL ARCHES AND BRANCHIAL CARTILAGES. 307

serve for the attachment of segmental muscles. At no time in its phyllogenetic
history has it any functional connection, or relation to the endoderm, or to the ali-
mentary canal.

Il. Tae Nevurat Arcues. (Figs. 70, 75, 78, 209.)

The neural arches (endochondrites of Lankester) are six small plates of
fibro-cartilage. They lie on the neural surface of the cord beneath theintegu-
ment, to which they are attached near the base of each pair of gills. Each arch
is concave on its inner surface and partly surrounds the nerve cord, holding it
firmly in place. (Figs. 70, 75, 78.) The opercular neural plate is typical; it is
rectangular, and its flat neural surface is indented by two pits, from which arise
a pair of muscles attached to the inside of the operculum. A pair of anterior
and posterior processes serve for the attachment of strands from the longitudinal
muscles of the abdomen. On the sides of the arch is a pair of processes which
project hemally and a little outward and backward, one on each side of the
ventral cord. They furnish attachment for a pair of hemo-neural muscles that
are inserted on the hemal side of the carapace, just median to the entopophyses.

The neural arches of Limulus may be regarded as the precursors of the neural
arches of vertebrates, with which they agree in location, and in their general form
and function. No other invertebrate is known to have neural plates of this
character.

III. BrancwtaL CarTILAGES. (Figs. 78, 209, 210, 211.)

‘There are seven pairs of branchial cartilages in Limulus. The most anterior
pair are two small bars arising from the inner surface of the chilaria, and attached
to the posterior margin of the endocranium. (Fig. 215.) The remaining six
pairs arise from the base of the abdominal appendages, and go to the corresponding
entopophyses. (Fig. 209.)

The branchial cartilages arise at an early embryonic period as clearly de-
fined outgrowths of the walls of the mesoblastic somites. (Fig. 210.) Their
union with the epidermis is secondary, and they are in nowise derived from
chitenous ingrowths of the epidermis.

The branchial bars serve for the attachment of the flexor and extensor
muscles of the gills, and for a small muscle, the internal branchial, arising from
the corresponding neural plate. ‘The opercular bar is the largest. In a small
male, it is about 25 mm. long, oval in cross-section, and about 6 mm. by 3 mm.
in diameter. The remaining bars decrease gradually in size to the posterior end
of the series.

A band of cartilage, similar histologically to that of the branchial cartilages,
extends from the distal end of one entopophysis to the next, uniting the hemal
ends of the gill bars. (Fig. 209.)

308 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

The branchial bars are hard and elastic, and have the general appearance
and consistency of hyaline vertebrate cartilage. Chemically and histologically,
they are quite different from the fibro-cartilage of the endocranium, or of the
neural plates. There is apparently no invertebrate, outside of the arachnids,
that has a tissue comparable with it. The nearest approach to it, chemically
and histologically, is the muco-cartilage in Petromyzon. The branchial bars of
Limulus correspond to the gill bars of the post auditory region of vertebrates, as
we first indicated in 1889. In 1893, we called attention to the surprising histo-
logical resemblance between these cartilages and those of Petromyzon, and still
later, 1896, it was shown that in abnormal Limulus embryos, one or more pairs of
appendages were invaginated, forming transverse slits along the sides of the head,
that resemble vertebrate gill slits or the lung books of the arachnids. (Fig.
183, A.)

Fic. 210.—Sagittal sections of Limulus embryos, showing successive stages in the development of the branchial
cartilages. After Patten and Hazen.

Development of the Branchial Cartilages in Limulus.—The following
description is based, in the main, on what takes place in the operculum. The
cartilages in the other abdominal appendages develop somewhat later, but in a
very similar manner.

In an embryo of three abdominal segments, there is no trace of the opercular
cartilage. (Fig. 210, A.) By the time five abdominal segments are developed,
the outer wall of the somite forms a thick ring of mesoderm around the base of
the appendage. The opercular cartilage makes its appearance as a transverse
plate of cells subtending the ring, with its distal end projecting into the cavity of
the appendage. (Fig. 210, B.)

In the next stage, C, where one gill leaf is developed on the first branchial
appendage, the cartilages have increased in size and now show the features that
characterize them so clearly in the later stages; viz: 1, the cartilage cells are larger

BRANCHIAL CARTILAGES OF LIMULUS. 309

than the surrounding mesoderm cells, and have distinct cell walls; 2, they are
arranged in rather regular order; and 3, the protoplasm stains very lightly in
borax carmine.

In the next stage, with three gill leaves on the first branchial appendage (Fig.
210, D), the cartilages form long flat plates that extend some distance beyond
the ring of mesoderm into the appendage. The cartilage of the first gill is
attached to the anterior wall of its appendage, and extends from there to the
corresponding somite, which has now become a venous sinus bounded by a thin
membrane.

A perichondrium is now visible, composed of a layer of spindle-shaped cells,
apparently derived from the breaking up of the mesodermic ring, and not from a
transformation of the peripheral cartilage cells. The latter, as we have shown,
are formed from the mesothelium of the somatic walls.

The ends of the branchial cartilages finally fuse with the ectoderm on the
anterior wall of the appendages and with the hemal wall of the abdomen. At
these points the cartilage and ectoderm are so completely united that their original
boundaries cannot be distinguished.

The spaces in the distal ends of the gills are crossed by fibrous columns
arising from the ectodermic walls. At the base of each column are several nuclei,
as though the columns were formed by the union of several cells. At this stage
no mesoderm extends into the appendages beyond the distal ends of the cartilages.

In the early trilobite stage the branchial cartilages differ but little, except
in size, from those in the adult.

Minute Structure of Branchial Cartilage.—During the late larval period,
each cartilage cell develops on its outer surface a cartilage-like matrix that en-
velops and isolates each cell. This is the primary capsule. It gradually in-
creases in size, forming a large thin-walled chamber, within which the cell con-
tinues to divide in the three planes of space, each division plane being generally
at right angles to the preceding one. After each division the daughter cells form
new capsules inside the old ones. As there is little or no shifting of the cells
after each division, the shape and position of the primary, secondary and tertiary,
etc., capsules show pretty clearly the history of the previous divisions.

The cluster of cells and capsules enclosed in the primary capsule constitutes
a cartilage nest. The nests are largest in the axis of the gill bar; the periphery
of the bar consists of small cells not clearly grouped into nests. ‘The cartilage
tissue terminates abruptly under the perichondrium. The two tissues are dif-
ferent chemically and ontogenetically and there are no indications of intermediate
stages between them, although occasionally one finds a small cluster of cartilage
cells enclosed like a foreign body, in the perichondrium, or in the fibrous tissue
connecting the inner ends of the entopophyses. Similar nests of capsuligenous
cartilage are said to occur in the endocranium of Mygale (Lankester) and Tele-
phonous (Gaskell).

When the gill bars with their adhering fibrous and muscular tissue are boiled

310 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

for a short time in caustic potash, the perichondrium and muscles are at once
dissolved, leaving the cartilage bar clean and free from all other tissues. The
cartilage swells and turns yellow and transparent, but otherwise appears to be
unchanged. After prolonged boiling it breaks down and disappears.

Thin sections of the gill bars, boiled in potash till the perichondrium is com-
pletely dissolved, show under the microscope irregular crevasses and spaces
around the central cell nests, indicating that the clear matrix, or cement, sur-
rounding them has been dissolved out. The capsules themselves are swollen,
and their walls appear much more distinctly laminated than before. On further
boiling, the axial portion of the section drops out, indicating that the nests have
been completely isolated; when boiled still longer, the peripheral portion breaks
down also.

Fic. 211.—Section of the branchial cartilage, in an adult Limulus, highly magnified, showing a single nest
of cartilage cells. The arrangement of the concentric layers of differently colored chondrin indicates the success-
ive generations of cartilage cells. Stained in thionin and picric acid.

When free hand sections of alcoholic material are treated with thionin,
complicated color reactions take place that vary with the thinness of the section,
strength of the solution, and apparently with the exposure to air and duration of
the staining. The reactions may be studied under the microscope in a watch
glass. If the stained sections are mounted in glycerine, it will be seen that the
lacune are lined with a finely granular protoplasm, with one or more small nuclei
on the periphery. (Fig. 211,”.) The center is filled with a fluid, containing in
some cases coarse granules of a deep reddish-violet, x’, in others, large spherules
of a faint yellow color, x. In most cases the central portion appears to be empty,
and if the sections are carelessly handled they may contain large air bubbles.

The capsules consist of alternating red, or violet, and blue lamine. The red
bands vary greatly in thickness and in the intensity of the color in different cap-
sules. The innermost one is deep red, with a rough irregular inner surface, the
larger protuberances probably marking the beginning of a new partition. Just

BRANCHIAL CARTILAGES OF LIMULUS. 311

outside this layer there may be a very sharp, thin, blue band, or a broad red band
of a lighter color. The most intense and widest blue bands form the middle
layer in the partitions between two cells, or between two groups of cells, or in the
layers surrounding the whole nest.

In some instances, after staining a short time only, these reactions seem to
be reversed, the violet bands appearing blue and the blue ones violet. The
violet bands are the first to stain, the blue ones appearing much later; they show
most clearly after the sections have been partially decolorized in glycerine.
Similar color bands are seen after staining with hematoxylin, except that the
bands are of different shades of purple.

If thionin sections are treated with weak picric acid, the blue bands become
intense green, and later bright yellow, while the violet bands are affected but little.
These preparations are most brilliant and are the ones from which the drawing
was made.

In the axial portions of the gill bars, the cell nests in some cases, are sepa-
rated by considerable areas of a nearly homogeneous matrix, some parts being
blue, others violet. The perichondrium stains a bright characteristic violet,
and the muscles blue.

The probable explanation of these complicated color reactions is that the
walls of each capsule consist of a graded series of different chemical substances
arranged in concentric layers, the substance giving the red reaction being the
most abundant in the inner protoplasmic layers of the capsules, and that giving
the blue reaction being more abundant on the periphery, with intermediate
transitional compounds between; and that the blue material is formed by a gradual
modification of the red.

The gill bars of Limulus are exceedingly interesting histologically, and deserve
a more careful and detailed description than we can give them here. The main
points we desire to establish now are that they contain true cartilage of a very
primitive type, and that this cartilage is quite different, chemically and histologi-
cally, from that found elsewhere in Limulus.

The reaction of the gill cartilages to thionin and hematoxylin indicates that
they contain, besides other substances, a considerable amount of mucin. This
fact, together with their remarkable histological structure, emphasizes still more
strongly the resemblance between the gill bars of Limulus and those of Petro-
myzon. Moreover, the extraordinary difference between the capsuligenous
cartilage and the fibro-cartilage of the endocranium in Limulus is paralleled by
the fact that there is a corresponding difference between gill cartilage and cranial
cartilage in the cyclostomes.

The fibro-cartilage of the arachnids appears to have arisen by the gradual
transformation of fixed muscle ends into sinews or tendons, in proportion as the
corresponding muscles become more active and voluminous. The capsuligenous
cartilage appears to arise “de novo,” making its appearance as an entirely
different looking material from that in which it is imbedded. The gill bars

312 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

for example are well developed at a very early embryonic period, and appear
to be quite out of proportion to the volume and functional importance of the
surrounding muscles. Moreover isolated and highly developed cartilage cells,
or cell nest, may be seen in adult crabs lodged in the perichondrium of the gill
bars, or at the ends of the entopophyses and in other places where they appear
quite foreign to the surrounding tissues, and with nothing to suggest the reason
for their presence in such unusual surroundings.

IV. THe ENDOCRANIUM.

The endocranium, variously named prosomatic endosternite, cartilaginous
sternum, or plastron, has been found in many of the arachnids and in the
phyllopods. In 1889, I figured and described the endocranium of the scorpion,
and compared the endocrania of the scorpion and Limulus with the primordial
cranium of vertebrates. In 1899, in collaboration with Mr. Redenbaugh, a
graduate student in Dartmouth College, the endocrania of Apus, Mygale, and
Limulus were described and illustrated in more detail.

* * * * * * * * *

The endocranium of arachnids is a broad plate of fibro-cartilage lying on
the hemal side of the brain. It serves primarily for the attachment of the
muscles that move the oral appendages, and for the flexor muscles that move the
cephalo-thorax on the branchial section of the body. In scorpions and in Limulus
a complete occipital ring is formed about the spinal cord, near its union with
the brain.

The floor of the endocranium is a continuous structure and there are no
indications that it consists of originally separate pieces; the supra-occipital plate,
when present, may be regarded as a modified neural arch belonging to the
vagus segments. We recognize in the higher arachnids three principal parts, viz.
two lateral bars; a broad median plate that unites the posterior ends of the
bars; and a bridge of cartilage on the neural side of the nervous system, which
together with the above mentioned parts forms a closed ring about the anterior
end of the spinal cord.

The endocranium has a true cartilaginous consistency, and is composed of a
mass of interwoven fibers and a dense matrix containing stellate lacune united
by anastomosing canaliculi. In the living cartilage, the canaliculi contain
minute branching processes of the cartilage cells situated in the lacune.

The endocranium of arachnids, as I first pointed out in 1889, represents
the ancestral stage in the evolution of the primordial cranium of vertebrates, the
lateral bars, the transverse plate, and the neural arch of the arachnid cranium
corresponding respectively to the trabecule, the parachordals, and the occipital
ting of the vertebrates.

The Endocranium of Apus. (Fig. 212.)—In Apus the endocranium

\

\

THE ENDOCRANIUM OF APUS. 313

is a thick plate of fibro-cartilage, without an occipital ring, located just behind
the mouth, between the central nervous system and the intestine. The body of
the endocranium is elongated in a transverse direction, its flaring ends giving
attachment to the powerful adductor muscles of the mandibles.

A pair of chitenous apodemes, apo., project into the posterior side of the
endocranium. They are ectodermic invaginations lined with chitin, formed be-
tween the bases of the first and the second pair of appendages. From the inner
ends of the apodemes, a pair of tendenous cords run directly through the body
of the endocranium, at right angles to its fibers, emerging on the anterior side as
the anterior cornua, ac.

The endocranium terminates posteriorly in a thin membrane w, which is
attached to the integument between the nerve cords.

Longitudinal muscles of the abdomen are attached to the posterior sides of
the apodemes and to the endocranium itself. A process on the neural side of

Fic. 212.—Endocranium of Apus; A, Neural surface; B, hemal surface. The mandibular muscles are at-
tached to the large transverse processes, m; maxillary muscles to the small processes, x. A pair of chitenous en-
topophyses, apa., are imbedded in the posterior side of the endocranium. X27 1/2. After Patten and Redenbaugh.

each apodeme serves for the attachment of muscle strands going to the inside
of the second pair of maxille, «. Heemo-neural muscles are attached to the hemal
sides of the apodemes, and a pair of muscles, inserted on the posterior neural
portion of the endocranium, ., pass between the nerve cords to the integument
just back of the first cross commissures.

Endocranium of Mygale (Fig. 213.)—The endocranium of Mygale is a
large oval plate of fibro-cartilage with crenate margins; like that of Apus, it lies
between the alimentary canal and the central nervous system.

The neural surface is concave and provided with paired, plate-shaped
processes, A, #.pl. From about the middle of the large anterior cornua, arise a
pair of neural processes, ”.pr’, which bend around the brain and attach them-
selves to the integument close together on the neural side. They probably
represent the lateral portion of the occipital ring of Limulus.

On the hemal side, B, two high, flaring ridges converge toward the posterior
end of the endocranium, forming a deep gully in which lies the alimentary tract.

314 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

The hemal ridges are split up into five pairs of hemal processes, h.pr."*, of
unequal length. The endocranium ends posteriorly in a short median process.
From nearly the whole of the neural surface muscles go to the base of the legs.
Hemo-neural muscles are attached to the hemal processes, and longitudinal
muscles to the posterior process.

The cesophagus passes through the brain, between the anterior cornua,
to the sucking stomach which lies in the groove on the hemal side of the endocra-
nium. Muscle strands run from the stomach to the walls of the groove.

Endocranium of Limulus (Figs. 2, 70, 75, 78, 209, 214, 215).—The endo-
cranium of Limulus is the largest of any living arachnid. It is a rectangular

nel?

Fic. 213.—Endocranium of Mygale. A, Neural surface; B, hemal * surface. 5. After Patten and
Redenbaugh.

plate of fibro-cartilage, about three inches long, two and one-half inches wide,
and from one-eighth to one-half an inch thick on the margins. It lies near the
center of the cephalothorax, with its anterior margin about opposite the cheli-
cere, and its posterior one opposite the chilaria. It serves as a center of attach-
ment for the more important muscles of the thorax. The mouth is located a
little anterior to the center of the endocranium. From it the cesophagus passes
forward, through the brain, and between the anterior cornua to the mesenteron.
(Figs. 78-209.) The latter begins a short distance in front of the endocranium
and extends straight backward close to its hemal side.

The neural surface of the endocranium is nearly flat and bounded on either
side by a sharp ridge or lateral wall. The anterior ends of the wall are much
higher and generally slope inward. (Fig. 215, A.) The posterior ends also in-
crease in height, turn inward and become continuous with the plate of cartilage
that forms the roof of the occipital region. The endocranium thus forms a shal-
low box, with low vertical walls along the sides and along a part of its posterior
end. There is no transverse anterior wall and no covering, or roof, except at the

THE ENDOCRANIUM OF LIMULUS. 315

posteriorend. The brain lies on the floor of this box, the ventral cord and several
pairs of nerves extending backward through the large occipital foramen in the
posterior wall. (Fig. 214.)

We may recognize the following parts, viz. The anterior cornua, a.c., a pair
of stout, transversely flattened processes formed by the forward prolongation of
the thickened lateral margins. From each process arise three muscles, the oppo-
site ends of which are attached to the hemal side of the carapace (Fig. 75); one
is directed forward from the extremity of the cornua, one perpendicularly from
its inner surface, and one obliquely forward from its hemal margin.

The neural margins of the cornua and the entire lateral portions of the endo-
cranium, including the posterior lateral processes, give attachment to the plastro-
coxal muscles of the second to the sixth pair of thoracic appendages. (Fig. 75.)

Anteriorly, the muscles do not cover the
neural surface of the endocranium, but pos-
teriorly the muscles increase in size with the
increase in size of the appendages, and encroach
upon the neural surface even to the median
line. There is therefore on the anterior neural
surface of the endocranium a triangular space
which, except for a few loose strands (plastro-
buccal muscles going to the cesophagus) is free
from muscles and comparatively smooth. (Fig.

215, A.)

The anterior hemal processes, l.c., arise from
the anterior hemal side of the endocranium.
They consist of two pairs of long and slender
processes each one attached by a short muscle
to the hemal side of the carapace, close to the
origins of the tergo-coxal muscles.

The posterior hemal processes, h.pr., lie on
the hemal side near the lateral edge of the
endocranium. ‘They incline slightly outward, and each gives attachment to two
muscles: one going from the extremity of the process to the carapace, and the
other from the posterior margin of the process to the first entapophysis. (Fig. 75.)

The posterior lateral processes, lp.pr., are flattened expansions of the posterior
portion of the endocranium. Along the posterior margin of each process, on the
neural side, is a sharp transverse ridge which, toward the median line, unites with
the lateral ridge and with the base of the occipital ring. The posterior-lateral
processes give attachment to some of the plastro-coxal muscles of the sixth pair
of legs, which are the most powerful appendages of the animal.

The posterior median process, p.pr., or basioccipital, begins as a median ridge
on the hemal side of the endocranium, between the hemal processes. It in-
creases in thickness posteriorly, ending in a bifid process, each division of which is

Fic. 214.—Endocranium of Limulus, seen
from the neural side, with the brain in place.

316 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

deeply grooved on the hemal side. Along the whole hemal side of the process
are attached two large muscles that go to the first pair of entapophyses. To the
body of the endocranium, on both sides of the basioccipital, are attached longi-
tudinal abdominal muscles. Their attachments extend a little anterior to the
hemal processes. In front of this, the body of the endocranium is destitute of
muscles on the hemal side. A pair of small chilarial muscles are attached to
the hemal side of the extremity of the basioccipital.

Fic. 215.—Endocranium of Limulus. <A, Seen from the neural surface; B, from the hemal surface; C, from the
caudal end.

The occipital ring, oc.r., begins at the points where the marginal walls meet
the posterior-lateral processes. Here two vertical outgrowths are formed which
unite with each other on the neural side of the ventral cord. At their bases the
processes are slender, but distally they enlarge and thicken, forming a polygonal,
supraoccipital plate that is joined to the capsuliginous bars, B, by strands of
connective tissue. Upon the neural surface of the supraoccipital plate are two
depressions, to which are attached a pair of muscles going to the insides of the
chilaria, ch.m. From the anterior edge of the plate, muscle strands pass for-
ward to the integument immediately behind the mouth.

The capsuliginous bars, B, arise from the thin posterior margin of the endo-
cranium, bend neurally and slightly toward the median line, and are attached to

THE ENDOCRANIUM OF THE SCORPION. 317

the posterior sides of the bases of the chilaria. A small transverse muscle joins
the distal ends of the two bars. Two other small muscles run to the chilaria
from the thin portions of the endocranium, near the bases of the bars.

It is especially noteworthy that the body of the endocranium is composed of
fibroid cartilage, while the bars just described are of capsuliginous cartilage,
exactly like that found in the abdominal appendages. The development of the
bars shows that they represent a pair of gill bars belonging to the chilaria, that
have been secondarily united with the cranidium.

Foramina.—There are two pairs of foramina for the passage of nerves. One
pair lies just outside the marginal wall, appearing on the hemal side of the endo-
cranium, a little posterior to the hemal processes, f'. The intestinal branches
of the hemal nerves belonging to the sixth thoracic neuromere pass through this
pair. (Fig. 214,/.n°.) The intestinal branch of the chilarial hemal nerve passes
through the second foramen, f”.

The occipital foramen is the large canal enclosed by the basioccipital and the
supraoccipital plates. Through it passes the spinal cord, the chelarial and
opercular nerves.

Endocranium of the Scorpion (Figs. 43, 216, 217, 218).—The endo-
cranium of a small American scorpion, probably Buthus carolinianus, was recon-
structed, by plotting serial sections of the whole thorax.
The endocranium of the large African scorpion was dis-
sected out and the drawings and measurements were
made under the simple microscope.

In the American scorpion, Fig. 216, the endocranium
consists of two nearly parallel plates of fibro-cartilage, or
trabecule; they are united at their posterior ends by a
broad basilar plate, which extends laterally into wing-
like, posterior-lateral processes, /.p., and backward in A de:
two long posterior processes, p.p. The thickened median é S
portion forms the basioccipital The trabecule are \
united in front of the basioccipital by a thick membrane,
on the neural surface of which lies the enlarged anterior Fre. 216.—Endocranium
end of the bothroidal cord, m.c. Opposite the ends of the caer ea
membrane, are two plate-like hemal processes, directed surface. Reconstructed from

sections and dissections,
hemally and laterally. The middle portion of the
trabecule are thin, nearly horizontal plates. The anterior ends are greatly
thickened and end in two pointed processes.

There is a distinct occipital ring enclosing the posterior part of the brain.

In the large African scorpion (Figs. 217, 218), the endocranium is heavy and
well developed and in its general form resembles the one just described. The
neural surface of the diverging trabecule is flat and their united posterior ends
form a thick basilar plate from which spring, right and left, the broad vertical
plates representing the posterior lateral processes, /.p. The supraoccipital,

318 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

oc.p., isa thick triangular plate with clean cut, beveled edges. The apex extends
forward as two diverging tendons, an.s., and the posterior angles extend backward
over the occipitals as diverging crests that become continuous with the ragged
flaring plates that represent the posterior processes, p.p. A small vertical process
arises from the middle of the posterior margin of the supraoccipital. (Fig. 218, 7.p.)

When seen from behind, the occipital ring presents a very striking resemblance
to the occipital region of a vertebrate cranium. (Fig. 218, B.) The exoccipital
region is heavily reinforced, and on each side a ridge extends laterally from the
posterior face of the exoccipitals along the posterior process.

The hemal plates are two deep, flaring plates extending along the hemal
surface of the trabecule and basilar plate. The posterior hemal processes, /.p.,
may be regarded as a local specialization of the hemal plates, corresponding to
the posterior pair of heemal processes in the endocranium of mygale. They are long

Fic. 217.—Endocranium of a large Fic. 218.—Endocranium, same as in preceding
African scorpion, seen from the neural surface. figure. A. Seen from the side; B, the occipital por-
Cam. outline. X7. tion, seen from the caudal end. x7.

narrow plates arising about opposite the anterior margin of the occipitals. The
anterior hemal process, a./.p., is a thin, irregular prolongation of the anterior
margin of the hemal plate. It is of uncertain form, since its margins are easily
injured in the dissection.

The hemal plates converge posteriorly, following the general direction of
the trabeculae. The anterior ends flare outward; the posterior ends are nearly
vertical, and form the lateral walls of a deep sub-cranial channel in which lies
the posterior portion of the stomodzeum and the anterior end of the gut. In Fig.
218, A, the brain and endocranium are shown from the side in their proper re-
lations. The anterior ends of the trabecule reach almost to the anterior surface
of the bent over forebrain. The neural surface of the trabecule forms two
horizontal shelves on either side of the hindbrain, the four posterior thoracic
neuromeres sending their nerves laterally over the neural surface of the shelf.

THE ENDOCRANIUM; SUMMARY. 319

The supraoccipital forms an arching roof over the posterior thoracic and vagus
neuromeres. The thoracic nerves pass out of the endocranium through the wide
open sides, while the nerves of the four vagus neuromeres, together with the nerve
cords, pass backward and out of the cranium through the foramen magnum.

Telyphonus.—The endocranium of Telyphonus (Fig. 219), can be readily
reduced to the type of those described above.

Fic. 219.—Endocranium of Telyphonus, A, Neural surface; B, hamal; C, side. X5 1/3.
V. SUMMARY AND COMPARISON.

I. Endocranium.

1. A cartilaginous endocranium is eminently characteristic of the phyllopod-
arachnid-vertebrate stock. It appears to be absent in the insects, myriapods and
crustacea. Its simplest adult condition is seen in Apus and Branchipus where
it is an unpaired, unsegmented basilar plate of fibrocartilage, with thickened
margins and projecting cornua. This is also its early embryonic condition in
Limulus.

2. The evolution of the form, location, and mode of growth of the endocra-
nium was determined primarily by the size and functional activity of the mus-
cles and appendages with which it was associated.

3. The basilar plate served primarily for the attachment of muscles arising
from the bases of the mandibles, or of the anterior thoracic appendages. It is first
seen in the anterior midbrain region as a thickened horizontal membrane, lying
between the nerve cord and the alimentary canal and extending across the median
line from the base of one appendage to its mate.

In Apvus and Branchipus it is confined to the mandibular metamere; in

320 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

Limulus and other arachnids, it arises from all the thoracic and first vagus
metameres, and in the adult it may cover a much wider territory than the entire
brain.

4. The extension backward of the basilar plate in the arachnids, and the
increased volume of its posterior portion, was due to the diminished size of the
anterior thoracic appendages and the increase in size of the posterior ones. Also
to the fact that as the thoracic metameres united more intimately with each other
and with the forehead, the posterior portion of the basilar plate served as a more
and more important point of attachment for those voluminous longitudinal trunk
muscles that helped to move the whole cephalothorax on its hinge-like joint.
Another factor that aided in the development of the occipital region was the crowd-
ing forward of the neural arches of the vagus segments to form the supraoccipital
plate, and the union of the latter with the underlying basilar plate to form the
occipital ring. The occipital region was also reinforced by the addition of the
branchial bars of the rudimentary vagus appendages to the posterior part of the
basilar plate.

5. The basilar plate is anchored to the hemal wall of the cranium by the
powerful plastro-tergal muscles that arise from the keel-like hemal plates. The
size of these plates, their form, and the direction of their fibrous constituents,
is determined by the amount and direction of the strain on them, and hence is
determined indirectly by the same factors that control the form and development
of the basilar plate and the occipital ring.

6. Thus the evolution of the arachnid endocranium becomes intelligible.
Its four main axes, or planes, of growth that have given rise to the transverse
basilar plate, the longitudinal trabeculz, the vertical hemal plates, and the heavy
occipital ring, are due more remotely to those causes controlling the concrescence
of the cephalic metameres, and more directly to the nature of the three axes of
muscular strain, transverse, longitudinal, and vertical, that have acted upon it.
It will be observed that owing to the relation of the endocranium to the mouth,
brain, stomodeum, and intestine, the framework of the endocranium could not
be constructed along any other lines than those indicated. (Fig. 220.)

7. There is no reason to doubt that the conditions prevailing in living arach-
nids, also obtained in the trilobites and merostomata. In the gigantic eurypter-
ids, with powerful, oar-like appendages and movable head, the endocranium
probably reached a higher grade of development than in any of their living repre-
sentatives.

8. The fully developed arachnid endocranium is in every essential respect a
duplicate of the primordial cranium of a primitive vertebrate embryo. They
agree: a. In their position relative to the brain; 0. in their general form; c. in their
mesodermic origin and histological structure; d. in their absence of segmenta-
tion, although spreading over several metameres; e. in their great size compared
with the brain; and /. which is the most important agreement of all, they agree
in their four axes, or planes of growth; namely, the transverse growth of the basilar

THE ENDOCRANIUM; SUMMARY. 321

plate, the longitudinal growth of the trabeculae, the overarching growth of the
occipitals, and the longitudinal vertical growth of the hemal plates or palato-
pterygo-quadrate arcade. (Compare Fig. 220.)

9. The endocranium has developed along these lines primarily in response to
muscular strain, and its principal axes of growth, therefore, coincide with the
axes of strain. But after it has become established phylogenetically, as in the
vertebrates, it acquires a new moment of growth that is independent of the
direction or location of the muscular strains brought to bear upon it.

hye

‘Fic. 220.—Diagrams illustrating three stages in the evolution of the arachnid endocranium. A, Phyllopod
stage, seen from the neural surface, and in transverse section. The endocranium consists of a flattened basilar
plate, located in the region of the oral appendages (mandibles and maxille) and composed of a thickened trans-
verse bar, and two longitudinal ones. B, Primitive arachnid stage; the endocranium extends over the whole
of the thoracic region, and shows the beginning of the anterior and posterior cornua, a.c. and p.c., lateral and
haemal processes, /.p. and h.p., and marginal ridges. m.r. C, Arachnid stage, showing the fully developed arachnid
endocranium, and the principal axes of growth.

to. The vertebrate embryo picks up the growth of the endocraniumat about the
highest stage reached in the arachnids. Ifthe growth of the arachnid endocranium
advanced still farther along the lines it has already established, it would follow
very nearly the later embryonic development of the vertebrate cranium. For
example, a. the upward growth of the lateral walls of the trabecule; b. the forward
growth of the supraoccipital; c. the forward growth of the trabecule and the

ar

322 ENDOCRANIUM, BRANCHIAL AND NEURAL CARTILAGES.

union of their anterior ends; d. the closing up of the pituitary foramen; and e. the
separation of a part of the hemal arcade from the basilar plate to form the pterygo-

quadrate arcade.
II. Branchial Skeleton.

1. a. In Limulus the first six pairs of appendages, i.e., those belonging to the
same metameres as the endocranium, never develop appendicular cartilages. In
the seven following appendages, the bars are present; they are the:efore post-
cranial in origin, although the first pair (chilarial) is firmly attached to the pos-
terior end of the basilar plate. b. The hemal ends of the branchial bars, except
the first pair, are united by a longitudinal band of cartilage. c. The gill bars and
the longitudinal band are composed of capsuliginous mucoid cartilage, quite
different chemically and histologically. from the cartilage of the endocranium;
and d. The three pairs of hemal processes in Limulus have a superficial resem-
blance to the gill bars in position and direction, but they are of a different nature
in structure and origin, and belong primarily to the endocranium.

2. Similar conditions prevail in vertebrates: a. The true branchial bars
are independent, post-cranial structures, the anterior pairs being joined second-
arily with the cranium. 0. The segmentally arranged gill bars may be united by
continuous longitudinal bands. c. The gill bars and bands are composed of
muco-cartilage differing chemically and histologically from the fibro-cartilage of
the endocranium. d. The four or five preauditory metameres (excluding the
forebrain region) never give rise either to typical or fully developed gills, or to
gill bars. e. The proximal portion of the palato-pterygo-quadrate-hyoman-
dibular arcade does not represent modified gill arches. It belonged originally
to the primordial cranium and represents in part the hemal plate arcade of the
arachnid endocranium. (Fig. 220.)

III. Neural Arches.

The neural arches of Limulus represent the initial stages in the formation of
a vertebral column. Their contour is due to the direction and intensity of the
muscular strain acting on them, and they agree in general form and in the direc-
tion of their processes, with the neural arches of vertebrates.

CHAPTER XVIII.
THE MIDDLE CORD THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

The failure to recognize the notochord in invertebrates has been due to the
prolonged domination of the annelid and gastrula theories.

It has been generally assumed that the notochord is found only in the verte-
brates because no one could find one in the invertebrate midgut where the gas-
trula theory proclaims it ought to be located if present. So long as it was con-
fidently assumed that the “archenteron” of vertebrates was the ontogenetic
repetition of an ancestral midgut, and that its associated parts, mesoderm and
notochord, were necessarily entodermic in origin, no one ventured to look for the
notochord elsewhere than in the midgut of an annelid, or in some other worm-
like invertebrate. It is not surprising then that almost any unpaired enteric
outgrowth has been called, at one time or another, a notochord, thus giving a
pseudo-respectability to such morphological curiosities as diplochorda, adelo-
chorda, hemichordata, etc. On the other hand, any organ not entodermic
in origin was thereby branded as illegitimate and excluded from further con-
sideration. .

One misinterpretation led to another, till the original theory became so deeply
buried that embryologists appeared to forget that the whole superstructure rested
on the extremely doubtful assumption that certain stages of vertebrate embryos
were to be interpreted in terms of adult jelly-fishes.

The fact that there was little or no evidence that the archenteron really
represents a primitive gut, or that the notochord ever had any other function than
it has at present, was persistently ignored.

As I stated in my earliest paper on this subject, 1889, p. 351: ‘‘ There is nothing
in the embryology of the vertebrates to show to what germ layer the notochord
belongs. It is never continuous with functional endoderm; there is no evidence
that it ever exercised, itself, any alimentary functions; or that it is ever con-
nected in any way with an alimentary canal.” The only thing vertebrate em-
bryology tells us about the notochord is that it has its origin, like the axial meso-
derm, the nerve cord, and the entoderm, in the common mass of growing cells at
the tail end of the embryo. As to the original function of the notochord, or its
relation to germ layers, vertebrate morphology has, as yet, had nothing conclusive
to say.

We must, therefore, first identify the representative of the notochord in the
invertebrates before we can safely interpret its morphology in vertebrates. This
we can do readily enough as soon as we eliminate the misconceptions of the
gastrula and annelid theories, for the main facts in the development of the verte-

323

324 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

brate and invertebrate notochord are sufficiently clear. The beginning of the
notochord may be recognized in practically all segmented invertebrates, as the
so-called middle cord, or median nerve, and in its derivative, the lemmatochord.
This structure forms a fundamental part of the body in all segmented inverte-
brates. It undergoes many modifications, but its location, function, mode of
growth, and its development, are in all cases essentially the same, and leave
no reasonable doubt that it is indeed the long looked for notochord of the in-

vertebrates.
J. Tae MrippLe Corp or INSECTS.

Acilius (Figs. 221, 222).—The middle cord arises at a very early em-
bryonic stage as a median longitudinal groove that extends from the posterior
margin of the stomodeum to the posterior end of the body. It should not be
confused with the so-called primitive groove of arthropods, or with the neural
groove of vertebrates.

Fic. 221.—The second pedal neuromere of an embryo of Acilius; serial sections showing the development of the
middle cord, and its relation to the cross commissures, inner neurilemma, or neuroglia, and median nerve.

The walls of the groove, in the interganglionic portions, give rise either to
thickenings to which muscles are attached (thoracic region) or to the median
nerve (abdominal region). ‘The walls of the intra-ganglionic groove give rise
to nerve cells that form a part of the ganglia, and to the neuroglia.

The early conditions are shown in a series of sections of the nerve cord of
Acilius opposite the second pair of legs,‘during the formation of the dorsal o1gan.
(Fig. 221.)

The groove deepens in front of the second pedal neuromere and its nuclei
become darker colored, A*. In the middle of the neuromere, the outer walls of
the groove have almost disappeared, while the floor forms a solid triangular block
of cells overlying the cross commissures, A*. A few nuclei, like those in the
middle cord, lic underneath the lateral ends of the cross commissures, iv/. On

THE MIDDLE CORD OF INSECTS. 325

the posterior margin of the neuromere, A*, the middle cord is still a solid tri-
angular block of cells, with its deep lateral angles spreading outward underneath
the longitudinal connectives. Still farther back, A‘, the middle cord is again
a deep groove, open at the surface, and with thin lateral walls. ‘The sections show
that the floor of the intra-ganglionic middle cord is raised over the cross com-
missures, and that the cells at the deep angles of the middle cord are spreading
forward and backward around the cross commissures and longitudinal connec-
tives. These cells form the so-called inner neurilemma, or neuroglia. There is
nothing to indicate that the cross commissures arise from the intraganglionic cells
of the middle cord, as is claimed by many authors. They appear to be out-
growths from the ganglion cells of the lateral nerve cords.

Fic. 222.—Nerve cord of an embryo of Acilius. A, !—", serial sections of an abdominal neuromere showing a later
stage in the development of the neuroglia and middle cord (median nerve); B!, inter-ganglionic infolding of middle
cord of the thorax in a newly hatched larva of Acilius, showing modifications of middle cord for the attachment
of muscles; B2, section in same stage of an inter-ganglionic space of the abdomen, showing the middle cord as the
ganglion of the median nerve.

In one of the next stages, a series of sections beginning at the anterior margin
of the second pedal neuromere, shows that the middle cord has now lost its con-
nection with the surface ectoderm. (Fig. 222.). In the center of the neuromere,
A+, its cells have multiplied and form a thick neuroglia investment around the
cross and longitudinal connectives. At the posterior end of the neuromere, A°,
the middle cord assumes its characteristic cell structure, and gradually merges
into the interganglionic cord.

In the later stages, at the time of hatching, the interganglionic segments of
the thoracic middle cord are still in connection with the ectoderm, as they are
through life, and wing-like bundles of muscles are attached to their sides, B’.
The interganglionic segments in the abdomen become completely separated from
the ectoderm, forming a cylinder of nerve cells like those of the lateral cords, B”
At each end the cord merges into the central tissues of the neuromeres. The
chain of abdominal interganglionic segments of the middle cord may now be
recognized as the median nerve of the adult.

Thus the thoracic furce for the attachment of muscles, the median nerve,
and the neuroglia are but different stages, or modifications, of a single structure.

326 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

We may conclude from the wide distribution of the middle cord in the arthro-
pods, and from the important part it plays in the early embryonic stages: 1.
That the central nervous system of primitive arthropods consisted of three par-
allel, longitudinal bands that were divided into similar segments; 2. that the
neuromeres of the middle cord fused with those of the lateral cords, and that the
longitudinal connectives remained separate; and 3. that there has been a pro-
gressive degeneration, or modification, or specialization, of the intra- and inter-
ganglionic segments of the middle cord from the head end backward into
non-nervous structures; while the lateral cords have increased in the specializa-
tion of nervous tissues from behind forward.

The Lemmatochord of Lepidoptera (Figs. 223, 224).—The lemmatochord
of lepidoptera, or Leydig’s cord, is a large, irregular, cylindrical rod of elastic,
semi-gelatinous tissue extending along the hemal side of the nerve cord from the
thoracic neuromeres to the posterior end of the cord. It serves as a support to
the nerve cord and for the attachment of lateral sheets of muscle fibers, the ends
of which are imbedded in the substance of the cord. (Fig. 224, B.) Itresembles
the notochord of vertebrates in its position, its consistency and general histological
structure; and in its function. Morphologically it represents the interganglionic
segments of the abdominal middle cord, enveloped in the thickened neurilemma
of the median nerve and that of the adjacent lateral cords. It makes its appear-
ance during the metamorphosis of the larvee into the imago.

* * ok * ok ** * * *

The following observations refer to the development of the lemmatochord of
Cecropia and Sphinx.

At the close of the larval period, the lateral and median cords are surrounded
by two membranes, an inner, distinctly cellular layer, 7.sh., and an outer one, 0.sh.,
that forms a thick hyaline membrane. During the early pupal stages, large
polygonal, or oval cells, with clear protoplasm and small nuclei, make their ap-
pearance between the inner membrane and the nerve cord. (Fig. 223, 4.) In
some places they are isolated and imbedded in a darker plasma. In others they
are crowded together and appear to have thick, but not sharply defined walls.

At this time the outer hyaline membrane, 0.sh., also increases greatly in thick-
ness and becomes distinctly laminated. Here and there small flattened nuclei are
seen, and in some places clusters of thick-walled chorda cells, B. These changes
take place in the membranes surrounding the ganglia, the longitudinal connectives,
and the median nerve.

During the subsequent period, the distinction between the two investing mem-
branes disappears, owing to the conversion of the flattened cells of the laminated
membrane into the characteristic, thick-walled chorda cells, and to its invasion
by chorda cells formed from the inner membrane. The chorda cells develop
most rapidly along the hemal surface of the lateral cords, and around the median
nerve; they thus form three large irregular bands of chorda cells, roughly tri-

THE LEMMATOCHORD OF LEPIDOPTERA. 327

angular in cross-section. The two lateral bands finally crowd the median one
inward, and unite with it to form a single cylindrical cord, in which the arrange-
ment of the chorda cells may still indicate the separate origin of peripheral and
axial cells. (Fig. 224, A. s.mn. and s.l.c.) Meantime the median nerve has dis-
appeared, or at least no traces of it can be seen, except where it rises to the surface
of the chorda to enter the ganglion, m.n.

Fic. 223.—Sections through the abdominal nerve cord of Cecropia, early pupal stage, showing the greatly
thickened sheaths of the median and lateral nerve cords. A, Midway between two neuromeres; B, near the pos-
terior side of a neuromere.

At the close of the metamorphosis, the cord has become irregularly oval, the
walls of the chorda cells have disappeared, and thei: nuclei have become irregular
in shape and size. (Fig. 224, B.) As the chorda assumes its final form, a thick

ee ES
™ J
~ Fic. 224.—Nerve cords and lemmatochord of Cecropia. A, Late pupal stage showing the fully formed lemmato-
chord, derived from the condensed sheaths of the median and lateral cords; also remnants of the median nerve; B,
adult Cecropia. The tissue of the lemmatochord has undergone degenerative changes, and at this point is invaded
by the ends of the attached muscle cells,

hyaline sheath forms around it, except along its hemal side where the muscle cells
are attached.

At the beginning of the pupal period the thickened neurilemma on the neural
side of the lateral cords becomes inflated with a network of trachea, tr., which
later disappears, leaving the cords again surrounded by a thin double layered
membrane.

The chorda muscles appear at the close of the larval period, just in front of

328 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

each neuromere, and close to the lateral branches of the median nerve, asa thin,
dark, nucleated band, extending across the hemal surface of the median herve.

In the young pupe the band expands very rapidly, forming in front of each
neuromere a transverse muscular sheet, broad over the median line and tapering
to a point at either side. They ultimately form a continuous sheet beneath the
cord. In the adult, the ends of many of the muscle fibers spread out in fanshaped
masses of fibers that penetrate the substance of the cord in alldirections. (Fig.
224, B, m.)

II. Tae Mippie Corp or THE SCORPION. (Figs. 15, 16, 43, 71, 225 to 230.)

The middle cord and associated parts are in some respects imperfectly de-
veloped in the scorpion, so that it is difficult to follow their local modifications;
but the conditions appear to be essentially the same as those we have described in
embryos of Acilius, and in the larve of Cecropia.

In the scorpion, the median nerve itself is hardly recognizable; its neurilemma
forms in part the walls of a blood sinus. The neurilemmas of the median and
lateral cords form the bothroidal cord of the abdomen and the merochord of the
posterior thoracic neuromeres. Chiten-lined neural apodemes are absent.

A. Neural Sinus, Merochord and Bothroidal Cord of the Adult.—In the
adult scorpion a large blood vessel extends along the hemal side of the nerve cord,
exclusive of the brain. In the abdomen and tail it opens into vertical channels

Fic, 225.—Cross-sections of the nerve cord of an adult scorpion. No, 1, Section through the posterior portion
of the first free abdominal neuromere; No. 2, section between the vagus and abdominal neuromeres, showing the
very thick walls and small lumen to the neural sinus; No. 3, section just in front of the second free abdominal
neuromere, showing the conspicuous hemal tracts; No. 4, section through the anterior half of the last caudal
neuromere, showing the solid cord of cells derived from the middle cord and continuous with the neural artery;
No. 5, section just in front of the anterior vagus neuromeres showing the merochord.

which, behind each neuromere, pass between the connectives to the skin on the
neural surface of the body. There are also in each segment two lateral branches
which follow pretty closely the course of the spinal nerves. Between the succes-
sive neuromeres the vessel is much enlarged, and is either round or triangular in
section. (Fig. 225°.) Beneath each neuromere it is much flattened and in some
cases hardly visible. (Fig. 225°.) The walls of the sinus consist of an inner epithe-
lial layer of clear cells, sharply contrasted with the dark coagulum in the sinus.

THE MIDDLE CORD OF THE SCORPION. 329

The outer layer is denser, contains a few small dark nuclei and scattering
bundles of longitudinal and circular fibers; it appears to be continuous with the
inner fibrous layer of the neurilemma. The sinus and the whole spinal cord is
surrounded by a layer of large granular cells which vary greatly in number and
arrangement in different parts of the body.

The Bothroidal Cord or Lemmatochord.—Along the hemal surface of the neural
sinus is an elongated, lobular organ extending the whole length of the abdomen.
At irregular intervals it forms large, spindle-shaped bothroidal masses that are
united with each other by a very delicate hyaline fiber. (Figs. 71,72). “The masses
vary in number and size; in three different specimens I have counted 4, 7, and 9
of them. In sections they have a lymphoid appearance, and are seen to consist of
dense, indistinctly fibrous masses crowded with minute, deeply stained nuclei.
(Fig. 225,/.ch.) They are united here and there with the neural sinus by short
stalks. In one specimen there were ten attachments of the cord to the sinus, six
of which were hollow and opened into the neural sinus.

In the embryos the tissue from which the bothroidal cord arises extends
forward into the thorax, where it forms segmental thickenings between the succes-
sive neuromeres. All these thoracic thickenings disappear, with the exception of
the one beneath the connectives of the fifth and sixth thoracic neuromeres. This
one becomes the merochord. It lies on the neural surface of the endocranium
near the anterior edge of the cross bar. (Fig. 71.) The adult merochord (Fig.
225°) is a large rounded body containing a few clear cells, many small dark nuclei,
and irregularly coiled muscle strands.

The overlying interganglionic space is closed and is filled with a dark coagulum
connected with the merochord by an irregular reticulum.

B. Development of the Lemmatochord.—-The lemmatochord arises, in
part, as an axial cord of cells extending forward from the primitive streak. In
stage A, Fig. 15, the primitive streak is seen as a large median mass of
polygonal cells near the posterior end of the embryo. In sections the cord appears
to form as an inward proliferation of the surface cells, but without the surface
infolding seenin Limulus. (Fig. 2261.) From the point of proliferation, covering
but one or two sections, the cord extends forward a short distance as a well de-
fined cylinder. In stage B, it is greatly reduced in thickness and forms a broad
lenticular band with the edges thinned out to a single layer of cells, not sharply
marked off from either mesoderm or endoderm. It is largest just in front of the
base of the tail lobe, and extends forward, becoming less and less distinct, as far
as the third abdominal neuromere. It does not extend into the tail lobe.

In the following stages, up to stage G, the primitive streak forms lens-shaped
thickenings beneath the 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 interganglionic spaces of the abdomen.
It is easy enough to distinguish these thickenings at this stage, but difficult to
determine their lateral boundaries. A fairly defined layer of flattened cells
separates them from the yolk. (Fig. 228.)

In stage K, Fig. 229, the primitive streak has definitely split along its whole

330 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

length into two layers, the under one being the anlage of the sexual organs, g.c.,
the upper one, the lemmatochord, J.ch. In a series of cross-sections of this stage,
beginning at the posterior end of the abdomen, the lemmatochord is first seen just
back of the sixth abdominal ganglion, as a dark lenticular thickening. (Fig. 230°.)
The cord has the same flattened appearance in all the sections until we reach the
vagus neuromeres, when it suddenly enlarges and assumes more of its future
appearance. (Fig. 229,47.) The anterior end of the lemmatochord is seen
between the second and third vagus neuromeres. (Fig. 2297.)

From this stage up to the time of hatching, the genital cells gradually sepa-
rate from the lemmatochord, and the latter separates from the neural sinus, except
at certain places where it remains permanently attached to the neurilemma of the

Fic, 226.—Embryo scorpion (Buthus carolinianus). No. 1, 2, 3, Sections through the posterior end of the
embryo, stage A; No. 4, 5, 6, 7, sections through the interganglionic spaces of the nerve cord, stage B.C; No. 8,
section through the middle of a terminal neuromere, stage C.

?
middle cord. By the time the body pigment is well developed, the lemmato-
chord of the first free abdominal ganglion appears as in Fig. 230%. In this
figure we can see indications of the passageway into the sinus. The lemmato-
chord, just behind the third vagus neuromere, is reduced to a slender fiber. (Fig.
230°.) At the posterior end of the abdomen it decreases in size and disappears,
apparently running directly into the thickened wall of the neural sinus. (Fig.
230°.)

In embryos just hatched we may obtain good surface views of the lemmato-
chord by dissecting out the entire nervous system. (Fig. 71.)

In half grown scorpions the lemmatochord is in about the same condition as
in the adult.

Merochord.—The lemmatochord tissue extends into the thoracic region, giving
rise to the merochord and to two adjacent, parallel cords of dense connective tissue.
(Fig. 71.) The first traces of these structures are a few isolated cells, lying be-
neath the interganglionic spaces of the thoracic and the first two or three ab-
dominal segments. They form lenticular thickenings, which vary in size and

THE NEURAL SINUS, NEUROGLIA AND CANALIS CENTRALIS. 331

appearance in the different segments, the ones between the fifth and sixth neuro-
meres being the largest. In stage K, one of these thickenings forms a disc-like
mass of dense tissue, with deeply stained nuclei, lying on the ventral surface of the
sternum beneath the sixth interganglionic space of the thorax. (Fig. 229, m.l.ch.)
This body is the merochord. It appears to be merely an isolated local enlarge-
ment of the thoracic portion of the lemmatochord.

C. Development of the Neural Sinus, Neuroglia and Canalis Centralis.
—The middle cord groove in the scorpion develops in essentially the same way as
in Acilius.

From the walls of the intraganglionic portions are formed a. ganglion cells;

ef
Rares

Ba.
e,
S8SKES.
eons

Fic. 227.—Scorpion embryo. No. 1, Section of an abdominal segment in front of the primitive streak, stage A;
No. z, abdominal neuromere, showing the breaking up of the medullary plate into primitive sense organs, stage C;
No. 3, abdominal region, between two neuromeres, stage E; No, 4, abdominal region through the middle of a neuro-
mere, stage E.

b. the epithelium of a central canal; c. neuroglia cells. From the interganglionic
portions arise a. transient nerve fibers of the median nerve connectives; b. walls
of the neural sinus; c. blood corpuscles.

In the adult scorpion, the walls of the neural sinus consist of an endothelial
layer of clear cells, often in sharp contrast with the enclosed coagulum. ‘They
pass without perceptible break into confused masses of tissue, and these into
blood corpuscles, which seems to indicate that the latter are formed from the walls
of the sinus during adult life.

It is difficult to define exactly where the sinus terminates anteriorly. In the
thoracic region of the adult, the interganglionic spaces may be quite large and
filled with the gelatinous substance and free cells, but the spaces do not seem to
communicate with each other freely or to be directly connected with the abdominal
sinus.

332 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

In surface views of young embryos, the lateral cords are seen to be separated
by a continuous shallow groove. (Fig. 15,4.) As the cords break up into neuro-
meres, the median groove narrows and deepens and becomes distinctly divided
into a succession of oval pits, one between each half neuromere. (Fig. 15, B.)
The anterior pits become more distinct for a while; their walls are then incor-
porated into the body of the neuromere at the points where the transverse com-
missures are formed. The posterior pits are formed between the future longi-
tudinal connectives; they gradually flatten out and become less distinct in sur-
face views. Sections from this stage show that the ectoderm of the posterior
pits thins out and draws away from the underlying basement membrane, forming
clear areas, or interganglionic spaces. (Fig. 226*, 7.g.s.) They may contain a

seeks s= 4

9c.

Fic. 228.—Scorpion embryo, stage G; cross-sections of the nerve cord, illustrating the development of the middle
cord, neuroglia, neural blood-vessel, lemmatochord, etc. No. 1, Section through the posterior margin of the third
vagus neuromere (comb segment); No. 2, section through the middle of the third abdominal interganglionic space,
or the one next behind the comb neuromere; No. 3, section through the posterior margin of the same space; No. 4,
section through the interganglionic space between two thoracic neuromeres, showing the continuity of the outer
portion of the middle cord from one neuromere to the other, and also the deeper lying cells derived from the inner
portion of the middle cord; No. 5, section between the fifth and sixth thoracic neuromeres; No. 6, section through
the middle of the fourth thoracic neuromere; No. 7, section through the middle of the second thoracic neuromere,
showing the middle cord as a prominent mass of cells on the bottom of the neural canal. The middle cord is not
connected with the ectoderm at this point. No. 8, Section through the space between the second and third thor-
acic neuromeres.

finely granular substance, a few fibers, and an occasional nucleus, the latter lying
just above the basement membrane, or among the fibers extending downward
from the roof. In stages E and F, the abdominal spaces contain a few free cells
which are undoubtedly blood corpuscles. As the spaces at this period are com-
pletely closed, the blood corpuscles were evidently formed by a modification of
the ectodermic cells of the middle cord.

In stage Fa few light coloied cells appear on the periphery of the interspaces
that mark the beginning of the neuroglia, or the inner neurilemma. (Fig. 227,/../.)

In stage F, the spaces are small and shut off from the ectoderm by the union
of the outer parts of the lateral nerve cords. (Fig. 227°.) The intraganglionic

THE NEURAL SINUS, NEUROGLIA AND CANALIS CENTRALIS. 333

cord is distinctly tubular. (Fig. 227.) Owing to the crowding of the thoracic
neuromeres, these middle cord tubes almost unite above the interganglionic spaces
thus forming a nearly continuous canal.

In the next stage, sections through the middle of each abdominal neuromere
show that the invaginated portion of the median furrow is losing its central cavity,
and now lies in the heart of the neuromere as a great cluster of cells difficult to
distinguish from the surrounding nerve cells. At the anterior and posterior ends
of the neuromere, the tissues of the middle cord are continuous with the neuroglia
layer separating the medulla from the cortex. (Fig. 228', z.n.l.)

2 =. <eh.-

Fic. 229.—Scorpion embryos, stage K, showing the later stages in the development of the middle cord, neural
canal, neural blood-vessel, genital cells and lemmatochord. No, 1, Section through the posterior vagus neuromere
showing the transverse commissural fibers above and below the remnants of the middle cord (neural canal); No. 2
section through the anterior vagus neuromere, showing median and lateral divisions of the lemmatochord; No. ;,
section just in front of the sixth thoracic neuromere, showing the local enlargement of the lemmatochord; No. 4,
section between the second and third vagus neuromeres, showing the enlarged lemmatochord and the anterior end
of the germ-cell cord; No. 5, section through the middle of the third free abdominal neuromere; No. 6, section about
midway between the third and fourth vagus neuromeres; No. 7, section through the anterior margin of the fourth
vagus neuromere; No. 8, section through the posterior portion of the third free abdominal neuromere.

The nterganglionic spaces in the thorax contain, besides a few scattered
nuclei, a loose fibrous cord that appears to run from one neuromere to another.
It probably represents the remnants of a median nerve.

In stages H and K, remarkable changes have taken place. All the inter-
ganglionic spaces are crowded with rounded cells. They fill the interganglionic
spaces and push their way forward and backward under the ganglia till they form
a continuous cord. (Fig. 229’*.) They are everywhere shut off from the sur-
rounding tissues by the inner neurilemma and by the basement membrane.
At the anterior and posterior ends of each neuromere they are continuous with
the intraganglionic portion of the middle cord. The latter is now reduced to a
small but well defined cord of cells in the middle of each neuromere just above
the medulla. (Fig. 229*%.) It is probable that the cells filling the interspaces
arose from a rapid proliferation of the ends of the ganglionic portion of the

334 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

middle cord, as well as from the division of the scattering cells seen in these
spaces at an earlier period. The same kind of cells arise in those parts of the
middle cord that remain united with the ectoderm, forming there masses of cells
continuous with those in the underlying interspaces. (Fig. 229°, b.c.) The
wedges are best developed just back of each free abdominal ganglion; their
central cells become free blood corpuscles, and the walls form the vertical
vessels arising from the neural sinus.

Sections through the vagus neuromeres show that the cells filling the in-
terganglionic spaces are united with those in the spaces in front and behind
by two cell cords; one is the intraganglionic portion of the middle cord, and lies
in the medulla between the neural and hemal commissures; the other consists
of cells that have pushed their way beneath the medulla. (Fig. 229°, m.ch, Ic.h.)

Fic, 230.—Scorpion embryo, about ready to hatch. No. 1, Section through the space between the fifth and
sixth thoracic neuromeres; No. 2, section through space between sixth and seventh thoracic neuromeres; No. 3,
section through posterior portion of the second vagus neuromere; No. 4, section through the first free abdominal
neuromere; No. 5, section between the second and third free abdominal neuromeres; No. 6, section through the
posterior margin of the third vagus neuromere; No. 7, séction just back of the third free abdominal neuromere;
No. 8, section between the second and third thoracic neuromeres, showing the remnants of the anterior end of the
middle cord.

Soon after stage H, the cell cord that filled the interganglionic spaces, and
that extended beneath the medulla of each ganglion, is replaced by a thin-walled
tube, the neural sinus.

III. MippL_e Corp or LIMutus.

It is difficuit to follow the middle cord in Limulus. In the adult it lies inside
the tough outer sheath of the nerve cord, and consists of irregular masses of matted
tissues resembling that in the bothroidal cord of the scorpion. (Figs. 55, 67, 68.)
It is arranged in two main lateral cords, one on either side of the neuromere, /.I.ch.
In the vagus region, a conspicuous median mass is present. (Fig. 55, m.lch.)
The lemmatochord tissue is continuous, by means of fine fibers, with the neuroglia
that everywhere permeates the nerve cord and forms an envelop for the ganglion
cells and the bundles of nerve fibers.

SUMMARY. 335

The condition in Limulus may be compared with the early larval stages in
the development of the lemmatochord in Cecropia, where the lemmatochord tissue
completely surrounds the cord.

IV. SUMMARY AND COMPARISON.

1. The middle cord of arthropods is of the same fundamental importance
in the morphology of segmented animals as the lateral nerve cord.

2. In the arthropods we may recognize two parts in the middle cord, viz.
the intra- and interganglionic segments. The intraganglionic segments are
located in the central portion of the neuromeres, on the neural side of the hemal
cross commissures. They may give rise in each neuromere to both ganglion
cells and neuroglia cells, and they may persist a longer or shorter period as solid
cords, or as epithelial canals representing the walls of the original median groove.

Fic. 231.—Diagrams to illustrate the mode of growth of the axial organs in the arachnids; such as the lateral
nerve cords, their infolding, the overgrowth of the ectoderm, and the formation of the cross commissures; the local
modifications of the middle chord to form the neuroglia, the lining of the central canal, blood cells, and lemmato-
chord; and the origin of nerve cords, ectoderm, and germ cells from the primitive streak, A, Sagittal section of
the axial organs; B, C, and D, cross-sections in front of the apex of the caudal lobe, showing the separation of the
nerve cords and germ cells from the tissue of the primitive streak; E, section farther forward, through the middle
of a neuromere; F, between two neuromeres; G, still farther forward, through the middle of a neuromere; H. same,
between two neuromeres.

The interganglionic segments of the middle cord gave rise primarily to
the median nerve and itsneurilemma. ‘They undergo various local modifications.
In the insects (Acilius), the oral segments disappear; those in the ‘eg segments may
produce the chiten-lined supports, or furce, which are permanently connected
with the ectoderm, and which serve for the attachment of muscles; in the abdom-
inal region, the same kind of infoldings are formed, but they separate from the
ectoderm at an early period and are converted bodily into the median nerve.
In lepidoptera, during the metamorphosis, the neurilemmas of the median and
of the lateral nerve cords become enormously enlarged and form a semi-cylin-

336 THE MIDDLE CORD, THE LEMMATOCHORD AND THE NOTOCHORD.

drical, unsegmented cord, lying on the hemal side of the nervous system, and
enclosing the remnants of the median nerve.

3. In the scorpion, the interganglionic pits of the median groove, in the
abdominal region, give rise to groups of cells, some of which become free blood
corpuscles, others neuroglia cells, and others form the walls of separate sinuses,
comparable with the neurilemma of a segment of a median nerve. The inter-
ganglionic spaces finally extend forward and backward on the hemal side of
the neuromeres, forming a continuous neural sinus.

4. The bothroidal cord, or lemmatochord, appears to develop from the primi-
tive streak. Later it unites with the wall of the neural sinus. It probably
represents the enlarged neurilemma of the lateral and median cords, and to-
gether with the neural sinus, corresponds approximately to the lemmatochord
of lepidoptera. The merochord represents a local enlargement of the lemmato-
chord in the sixth thoracic segment.

5. With the crowding together of neuromeres, the interganglionic and in-
traganglionic segments of the middle cord tend to unite and to form two con-
tinuous cords, or canals, which stand on different levels, and which have different
functions. One forms an internal cord, or canal, which lies in the central portion
of the neuromeres between the neural and hemal cross commissures; it gives rise
to neuroglia cells, nerve cells, and the epithelium of the canal. The other forms
an external cord, strengthened by a heavy investment of neurilemma, and serves
for the attachment of muscles. Both cords may contain a longitudinal canal,
and each canal may open into the other through segmentally arranged openings
between the cross commissures of successive neuromeres. ‘These conditions are
represented diagrammatically in Fig. 231.

6. These two cords are represented in vertebrates by the epithelium of
the canalis centralis, with its adjacent neuroglia tissue, and by the notochord.
The embryonic origin of both cords, in vertebrates as in arthropods, may be
traced to the growing apex of the embryo, and the method of growth of these organs
appears to be essentially the same in both classes.

Whether the median groove is differentiated into its component parts grad-
ually, so that all the intermediate stages are seen at the same time, arranged
in superficial linear order from one end of the embryo to the other, as in the
scorpion; or whether the differentiation takes place rapidly, at some deep-lying
point in the primitive streak, as for example in Amphioxus, is merely an ontogenetic
variation due to the amount of detail in the process of recapitulation and to the
relative time at which the details appear.

In the vertebrates, the early stages in the differentiation of the middle cord
are passed through rapidly, forcing the anterior end of the notochord below
the surface as fast as it is formed at the primitive streak. Its primitive relation
to the tissues lining the floor of the neural canal is indicated by the temporary
communications that obtain between the cavity of the notochord and that of the
canalis centralis at the posterior end of vertebrate embryos.

CHAPTER XIX.
THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

In the preceding chapters, we have shown that there is essential agreement
in the structure and mode of growth of the corresponding systems of organs in
the vertebrates and arthropods. This agreement is so intricate and all-pervading
that it is intelligible only on the assumption that the arthropods represent the
ancient stock from which the vertebrates arose.

But in spite of this underlying agreement in structure, there is a wide dif-
ference in outward appearance between any living arthropod and any living
vertebrate. To demonstrate a direct genetic relationship between them, we must
fill this apparent gap with real animals that are intermediate in character, or
account in some other way for the abrupt transition.

In either case, we must determine what are the highest arthropods and what
are the lowest vertebrates, and when and how the transition from one to the other
took place. Unfortunately there is no a priori way of deciding, in a phylogenetic
sense, what is “high” and what is “low,” until we have found out what are the
main lines of progressive evolution, and the directions in which they lead. In an
inquiry of this nature there is only one method that can be used, namely the
picture-puzzle method, whereby we aim through repeated trials to fit all the facts
into a complete and intelligible picture, knowing full well that there is but one way
for them to fit, and that when they do, we shall have an accurate picture of the
truth.

If on consulting the geological record we find in the remote past some period
toward which the genetic lines in question converge, blending there with a group
of animals having some characteristics of each, then there will be a very strong
presumption that we have correctly identified the upper and lower ends of the
break in the series; that that class of animals was the connecting link between
them; and that the actual transition took place at, or before, that period.

If on further examination it can be shown that the hypothetical connecting
link resembles in several different ways the upper end of the lower series and the
lower end of the upper one, and forms with them a continuous graded series, with
a tendency on one side of the connecting link to produce special structures, or
special methods of growth that are either anticipated or find fuller expression on
the other, then our previous assumption of genetic relationship attains thereby
the rank of actual demonstration, and it will not be shaken by any amount of
negative evidence, or by the threatened collapse of cherished convictions that the
picture was going to be something very different from what it actually turns out
to be.

oe, 337

338 THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

Such is the nature of the problem we have before us in the present chapter,
and such is the method we have used in seeking an answer to it. Fortunately we
are dealing with animals whose size, mode of life, and abundant skeletal struc-
tures are highly favorable to their preservation as fossils, and paleontology should,
and in my judgment does, give us the materials with which this part of our prob-
lem may be solved.

We may state at once that the conclusion we have reached is as follows:
The giant sea scorpions, or merostomata, as shown by their living representatives,
Limulus and other arachnids, may be regarded in a phylogenetic sense as the
highest arthropods, not because they now are the most highly organized, or the
most specialized, or the most efficient, because they are not entitled to any of these
distinctions, but because of all the invertebrates of their time they had made the
greatest progress in the attainment of that particular plan of structure that was
later to be so fully elaborated in the vertebrates. They were already in existence
in very remote pre-cambrian, or proterozoic times, and had reached a high stage
of development in the lower Silurian, when the ostracoderms were making their
first appearance, and long before any true vertebrates were known to exist. The
newly arrived ostracoderms had all the characteristics of an annectant class, for
as all authors admit, they bore a superficial resemblance, at least, in form and
mode of life to their arachnid contemporaries and associates, and at the same
time they unquestionably resembled the true fishes that were soon to appear on
the geological horizon. Paleontology, therefore, points very clearly toward the
marine arachnids as the historic predecessors of the ostracoderms, and to the
ostracoderms as the probable connecting link between them and the first true
vertebrates, such as the early dipnoi and the crossopterygians.

I. THE Marine ARACHNIDS AND THEIR ORIGIN.

The most primitive arthropods were undoubtedly marine animals of the
short-bodied phyllopod type, consisting of a relatively large forehead, or pro-
cephalon, and a small body composed of a small number of ill defined metameres.

We have seen that the foundation of segmented animals is the primitive head,
and that the primitive head represents the body of their remote ccelenterate an-
cestors. The ccelenterate, or radiate, stage is probably indicated, more or less
clearly, in the embryonic or larval stages of all ccelenterate derivatives. In the
annelids and molluscs, it is seen in the trochosphere larve. In the arthropods
and vertebrates, the corresponding stages are heavily provisioned with yolk, and
a free larval form for this stage does not exist; but remnants of it may be recog-
nized in the procephalic lobes, with the included gastrula and stomodeum.

From the trochozoa, the hypothetical, phylogenetic antecedents of these
larval stages, evolution proceeds along two, possibly three, main lines. In the
molluscan phylum, the main theme consists in variations and specializations
arising in the primitive head, and in the incipient, but still unsegmented
trunk. In the annelids and arthropods the most important variations and
the most significant new characters appear in the growing trunk, while

THE MARINE ARACHNIDS AND THEIR ORIGIN. 339

the primitive head from which it arose, gradually dwindles into structural
insignificance.

The subdivision of the trunk into a linear series of like parts or metameres
was coincident with its elongation and increase in size, and there was probably
little difference between annelids and arthropods during the earliest stages of
this process. But in the former, the production of new metameres by apical
growth frequently persists for an indefinite post-embryonic period, and special
groups of metameres may separate from the parent stock by transverse fission,
giving rise to a succession of new individuals.

In the primitive arthropods, the increase in the size of the body and in
the number of metameres proceeded very slowly. In the primitive arachnids,
crustaceans, and insects, the number of metameres produced was small, and
precisely limited; in no case was there a persistent production of new metameres,
either following normal, fission or otherwise.

The production of new metameres did not take place at a uniform rate, but
in a spasmodic, or interrupted, manner. In the arthropods each new generation
of metameres consisted of a relatively small number, frequently in threes or sixes,
followed, after a recognizable pause, by a new generation, and so on. Thus the
primitive arthropod trunk consists of a small number of metameres divided into
groups, each group sharply distinguished by the size and the degree of special-
ization of its organs from the group in front or behind. The general appearance
is that of an annelid undergoing transverse fission, and consisting of a chain of
incompletely separated individuals.

Various manifestations of this condition are seen in the nauplius, meta-
nauplius, and other larval stages; in the successive addition of metameres in
larval trilobites, and in the persistent subdivisions of the body of many other
arthropods into tagmata, or groups of like metameres, such as the oral, thoracic,
vagal, abdominal and caudal. In these cases each subdivision is produced more
or less clearly by a spasmodic generation of metameres, each group arising behind
the one previously produced.

This phenomenon is not confined to the arthropods; it is still recognizable
in the subdivision of the vertebrate head, and in the successive generations of
nephric tubules and other organs in the post-cephalic region. One of the most
important events in the evolution of the ostracoderms was the addition, probably
during the Ordovician period, of a new generation of caudal metameres to the
twenty odd that constituted the sum total of their inheritance from the arachnids.

The main difference between annelids and arthropods, besides the method
of apical growth, lies in the extraordinary development of the chitenous mantle or
exoskeleton of the latter, the presence of which no doubt exercised profound in-
fluence over the whole course of their evolution. Primitive arthropods, on the
other hand, appear to resemble the molluscan type in their restricted apical
growth and in the presence of the membranous folds arising from the aboral
region of the head, and which give rise in a suggestively persistent manner, either

340 THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

to the shell gland, or mantle, or to embryonic membranes, or branchiocephalic
folds.

The earlier stages in the evolution of arthropods can only be inferred, as
indicated above, from the records of comparative anatomy and embryology.
The original phylogenetic records are lost beyond recovery, for in the oldest
rocks in which any formal organic remains aie found, the eurypterid type appears
to be already present. These fragmentary remains, Beltina danai, consisting
of tracks, outlines of heads and appendages, were found by Walcott nine
thousand feet below the uncomformity between the Proterozoic (Algonkian) and
the Cambrian. ;

During the long subsequent period, including the Cambrian and Ordovician,
the familiar types of marine arthropods, such as the short-bodied bivalve ostra-
codes and the shield-covered phyllopods and phyllocarids, make their appearance
in increasing numbers. Trilobites and merostomes are likewise found in great
abundance and variety, the former reaching their climax in the Ordovician, the
latter in the Silurian and early Devonian.

During this long period, organic evolution proceeded very slowly and there
are no indications that any single event took place of exceptional importance
morphologically. Nevertheless important progress was made in the arthropods
in those complex processes of local suppression, union, and enlargement of mul-
tiple organs, that are such essential features of all progressive organizations, and
which alone could make a more active, varied, and efficient mode of life in seg-
mental animals a possibility. This kind of reorganization tends to convert the
linear succession of like metameres, each complete in itself and independent of
the others, into a linear succession of unlike organs, each subordinate to all the
others and all together forming a new organism of a much higher order. See
Chapters I and IT.

While the most important event of the Proterozoic period was no doubt the
outgrowth from the radially symmetrical ccelenterate of a new bilaterally symmet-
rical trunk, and the perfecting in it of a high degree of metamerism, in the Cam-
brian and Ordovician the important events were the breaking down of this meta-
merism, especially in the older and more anterior metameres, and the successive
merging of its various parts into a more efhcient aggregate, the cephalo-thorax,
that at a much later period was to become an important part of the complex
vertebrate ‘‘head.”

The trilobites, judging from strategraphical evidence and from their ex-
ternal form, remained what they had been almost from the outset, slow-moving,
sea-bottom feeders, like Limulus to-day, making only occasional, apparently aim-
less excursions, as free swimmers, into the water above.

But most of the merostomes in the manner above indicated had acquired,
at a very early period, a superior organization in the head region that enabled
them to leave the bottom and swim at large with purpose and effect. So far as

1 Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. X.

THE MARINE ARACHNIDS AND THEIR ORIGIN. 341

we know they were the first arthropods, or for that matter the very first animals
of any kind, endowed with the form and mechanical structure, with the sensory
and neuro-muscular system, adequate to perceive at a distance, to pursue, and to
capture living prey with measurable vigor and skill, and they finally became
the most rapacious and effective organisms of their time.

But the very events that were necessary preliminaries to their active life
were in the end the cause of their decline. The reduction of the oral appendages,
the fusion of thoracic metameres, the enlarged and condensed thoracic neuromeres,
gradually led, in the manner fully explained under their appropriate headings,
to the closing of the mouth, the inclusion of the lateral eyes in the neural tube,
and to other important changes that constitute the most complete metamorphosis
in the history of organic evolution.

The ostracoderms, and their allies, were the products of this metamorphosis,
and formed the most characteristic animals of the upper Silurian. Not till
toward the beginning of the Devonian had they become sufficiently readjusted
to their new conditions to again form active and dominant organisms, or to give
rise to the true vertebrates.

All the available evidence points to the conclusion that the merostomes
gave rise to the ostracoderms in the Ordovician or early Silurian period.
The constant association of merostomes and ostracoderms in the Silurian shows
that they lived together and were preserved under similar conditions; moreover
the similarity in structure and in general appearance between these two types;
the sudden appearance of the ostracoderms in the Silurian and their absence in the
preceding periods under conditions that are known to be favorable to their pre-
servation, as shown by the well preserved remains of their thinner skinned asso-
ciates of the Silurian; the culmination of the merostomes at about this period,
and their subsequent decline and extinction; and finally the absence of any
positive evidence to the contrary, admits of no other conclusion.

II. THE OsTRACODERMS.

The ostracoderms are so unlike any known veriebrates or arthropods that
very different opinions have been expressed, and are still held, as to their structure
and relations. It is a remarkable fact that in spite of their great antiquity and
simple structure, the liveliest discussions concerning them were on the question:
Are they vertebrates or arthropods? When the uncompromising verdict of Hux-
ley, and later of Lankester, was delivered in favor of the vertebrates, indeed defi-
nitely locating them in a highly specialized group of comparatively modern
teleosts, that verdict was generally accepted as final, and the morphological
significance that clearly belongs to them was nullified or ignored.

Apparently no one seriously considered the possibility that the ostracoderms
might be very primitive vertebrates that would shed a greatly needed light on
the character of their remote ancestors, or that they might be annectant forms,
standing midway between the arthropods on one side, and the true vertebrates on
the other.

342 THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

No doubt this was due, in part, to the remarkable development of their der-
mal skeleton, because, for a long time, it had been very generally assumed that an
animal with a continuous dermal armor could not be a primitive vertebrate, for
in the elasmobranchs, which were supposed to be the most primitive, the body
was covered with minute, isolated, dermal ossicles. It was also implicitly be-
lieved at that time, as it is to-day, with a conviction born of constant repetition,
that the immediate ancestors of the vertebrates were animals like either Amphi-
oxus, Balanoglossus, the tunicates, or the annelids, which had no dermal skeleton
whatever.

The author (Patten, 1889) was the first one to claim for the ostracoderms an
important place in the phylogeny of the vertebrates, basing this claim in part
on the very characters which were regarded by others as evidence of their high
degree of specialization.

At that time our knowledge of the ostracoderms was very imperfect and the
anatomical foundation for any inference in regard to them was exceedingly in-
secure. Since then, our knowledge has greatly increased and we now possess in
Bothriolepis, one of the higher representatives of the group, an unprecedented
wealth of material, which in spite of its great age is in an ideal state of preserva-
tion. Indeed, I know of no other extinct animal that has been so abundantly and
perfectly preserved in its original form, attitudes, and surroundings.

This new material for the first time enables us to identify with certainty the
neural and hemal surface of an ostracoderm; it furnishes us the first precise in-
formation concerning the nature and location of the sense organs, the jaws, mouth,
gills, and other viscera, and as to their mode of life; and for the first time it affords
a secure basis of fact for the interpretation of other representatives of the group
that are not sowell preserved. In the light of this evidence, we may now confidently
affirm that the ostracoderms belong neither to the arthropods nor to the vertebrates,
but constitute a new class standing midway between them, the ancestors of the
one and the descendants of the other, the long sought missing link between the
vertebrates and the invertebrates.

From the geological record we may conclude that the true vertebrates arose
from the ostracoderms not later than the Silurian; the ostracoderms from the
marine arachnids not later than the Ordovician; while the marine arachnids had
their origin in the immense, unfathomable periods during, or preceding, the
Proterozoic.

ok * ok * ** * * * *

Historical Review.

Before proceeding to a fuller description of the ostracoderms, we may to
advantage review the earlier literature on their structure and systematic posi-
tion, for it brings out the most striking features of such important genera as
Pterichthys, Pteraspis, and Cephalaspis.

HISTORICAL REVIEW. 343

Hugh Miller, the discoverer of Pterichthys, says (Old Red Sandstone, p. 50), in
comparing a trilobite with Cephalaspis, ‘‘The fish and the crustacean are won-
derfully alike.” “They exhibit the points at which the plated fish is linked to
the shelled crustacean.” Agassiz was at first in doubt as to whether Pterichthys
was a fish or a crustacean.

Sir Roderick Murchison, when first shown specimens of Pterichthys wrote
regarding them that, “If not fishes, they more clearly approach to crustaceans
than to any other class.” Again, “'They (Cephalaspis and Pterichthys) form the
connecting links between crustaceans and fishes.”

In Siluria (London, 1854, p. 252), speaking of Cephalaspis agassizii, he says:
“This fish with its large buckler-shaped head and its thin body, jointed somewhat
like a lobster, is perhaps the most remarkable example of a fish of apparently so
intermediate a character that the detached portions of its head when first found
were supposed to belong to crustacea.”” In a footnote Murchison adds: “Mr.
Miller has requested his readers to compare the head of Asaphus (now Phacops)
caudalus, a well-known silurian trilobite, with that of C. /yellii, to illustrate how
the two orders of crustaceans and fishes seem here to meet—in the view of persons
who have not mastered the subject.”

Eichwald says (1854, page 105): “It is very remarkable that this colossal
crab (Pterygotus) formerly regarded by L. Agassiz as a fish, occurs in the
dolomitic chalk of Rootzikiill in Oesel, together with another genus, Thyestes,
standing between crabs and fishes and resembling Bunodes and Cephalaspis.”

The genus Pteraspis was first proposed by Rudolph Kner, in 1847, to include
the forms described in 1835 by Agassiz as Cephalaspis lewisii, and C. loydit.
Their appearance was so unlike the ordinary fish remains that for a long time
Kner did not suspect that they had been already described by Agassiz in his
Poissons Fossils. From a study of their minute structure Kner believed them to
be the internal shells of cephalopods allied to Sepia.

In 1856, F. Roemer described a form closely related to C. lloydii as Paleoteu-
this, and referred it to the sepiide, but suggested that the forms described by
Kner were crustaceans related to Dithyrocaris or Pterygotus.

In 1855, R. W. Banks in his paper on the Downton Sandstones, after com-
menting on the association in these beds of Lingula cornea, Pterygotus and Pter-
aspis (Cyathaspis), made the following observation, page 98, “On the under side
of the sharp projections before referred to (on either side of the rounded snout)
are protuberances which seem to be projecting horny eyes similar to those of
crustaceans.”

He remarks further on, that doubtful as it is whether the buckler-like fossil
remains above referred to belong to fishes or to crustaceans, it is certain that they
are closely allied to Cephalaspis loydii and C. lewisii. In a final note, it is an-
nounced that Professor Huxley is now minutely examining their structure to
determine their true relationship either to the crustaceans or to the fishes. When
Huxley’s paper appeared, although he gave a very good description of the minute

344 THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

structure of the shell of these animals, and concluded that they were not crusta-
ceans, he entirely ignored the existence of the eye tubercles, although their pres-
ence afforded very weighty evidence against his conclusion.

Huxley (1858, page 277) in reply to Agassiz, who had remarked on the
singular resemblance between the shell of C. Woydii and that of crustaceans, and
to Roemer’s and Kunth’s opinion that Pteraspis was a crustacean, seems to have
closed the discussion for the time with his oft-quoted statement that ‘* No one can,
I think, hesitate in placing Pteraspis among fishes. So far from its structure
having ‘no parallel among fishes,’ it has absolutely no parallel in any other divi-
sion of the animal kingdom. I have never seen any molluscan or crustacean
structure with which it could be for a moment confounded.”

Roemer accepts these statements apparently because they came from Huxley,
although he does not make an unconditional surrender of his opinion, for he says
“Allerdings manche Analogie der atisseren Form mit Crustacean-Formen dar
bieten wurde.”’

In 1864, Lankester divided the pteraspide into the three genera, Pteraspis,
Cyathaspis and Scaphaspis. But in 1872, Kunth described a shield of Cyathaspis,
below which he found one belonging to Lankester’s genus Scaphaspis, and he
rightly concluded that the two shields belonged to the same animal. He main-
tained that the lower shield bore the same relation to the upper one that the tail
plate of a rolled up trilobite does to its head shield, and that between the two were
a number of pieces comparable with the segmental trunk plates of a trilobite.
Other plates were present which Kunth regarded as locomotor organs, or foot-
jaws. From the above facts Kunth concluded that these remains were not those
of a fish, but of an arthropod. In referring to Huxley’s statement that there is no
molluscan or crustacean structure with which such remains could be for a moment
confounded, and to Kner’s belief that Scaphaspis was the shell of Sepia officinalis,
Kunth adds “so schienen mir diese Ansichten in verein mit unserem vorliegenden
Stiicks mir zu beweisen dass wir es mit einer Crustacean Abtheilung von ganz
eigenthiimlicher Schalstructur zu thun haben. Denn jedenfalls giebt es weder
einen Fisch noch eine Sepien Schulpe, die eine ahnliche Structur wie die Schilder
zeigte; wohl aber ist die Organization des ganzen Stiickes beweisend fur Crus-
taceen Character” (page 6).

Both Schmidt (1873, page 330) and von Alth (page 47) agree with Kunth
that Scaphaspis is the ventral shield of Pteraspis, but they deny that any of the
remains described as Pteraspis, Cyathaspis or Scaphaspis are crustaceans,
although no valid reasons are given for doing so.

Lankester (1868, page 26) admitted the presence in Cyathaspis of tubercles
corresponding with similar tubercles in Pteraspis, which are ‘produced by the
supposed orbits;” but how a vertebrate eye, or an “orbit,” could be preserved as
a beautifully rounded protuberance when all the other soft parts are completely
destroyed, is not discussed.

Lankester attached much importance to the presence of scales on the anterior

HISTORICAL REVIEW. 345

trunk region of Pteraspis, for these scale-like structures were regarded as conclu-
sive proof that the pteraspide belong to the vertebrates. He says (1868, page
18) “All that is known as regards the scales of these fishes is from a single
specimen found in the cornstones of Herefordshire.” This specimen, he says
elsewhere (1873, page 191) “Shows seven rows of rhomboidal scales attached
(not merely adjacent to) to a portion of the head shield of Pteraspis. That these
are true scales, or lozenges of sculptured calcareous matter is absolutely certain.
It is also absolutely certain that the shield is pteraspidian and that the scales and
shield belong to the same individual organism. ‘The scales are fish-like. I know
no arthropod, nor any other organism except a fish which possesses any structure
even remotely representing them.”’ ‘‘The shields of the chitonide and cerripede
are the only animal structures, except the scales of a ganoid fish (with which they
agree exactly) which they could even vaguely suggest.” ‘The form of this
shield, and its details as to apertures, processes, etc., agrees with the view that it
belongs to a fish most fully. It has not the remotest suggestion of crustacean
affinities about it.”

After commenting on the fact that the fossil in question was marked with
long parallel strie, and that the middle layer contained the polygonal cavities, he
adds (1864, page 195), ‘“This structure, which has no parallel among fishes, or,
indeed, any group of the animal kingdom, leaves no possibility of a doubt that
the specimen is a fragment of Pteraspis.” Lankester further maintains (1868,
page 4) that by the discovery of these scales “the piscine nature of these fossils
was definitely set at rest.’

These positive statements are contradictory and are hardly warranted by
the facts, for the crustacean character of the shields had been repeatedly com-
mented on by competent observers, and in his own monograph (page 61) he has
described a fragment, possibly connected with Cephalaspis which he names
Kallostrakon podura (Tolypaspi 7) “on account of the resemblance to the well-
known mictoscopic markings of the scales of the insect Podura.”

But all recent students of the shell of Pteraspis are agreed that it is not “ex-
actly’’ like that of a ganoid fish, in fact its microscopic structure is altogether of a
different character, and it is not true that there are no arthropods with structures
even remotely resembling the scales of Pteraspis, because in Pterygotus the entire
body is covered with an ornamentation astonishingly like fish-scales in outward
appearance, so much so as to deceive such a keen observer of fishes as Louis
Agassiz. Moreover, in many trilobites, in the ceratiocarina, and in arachnids,
(Phrynus), the surface of the shell is ornamented with ridges and grooves not
unlike those of Pteraspis in external appearance.

Probably neither Hux'ey nor Lankester would have made the above state-
ments had they kept Pterygotus in mind, or had they been acquainted with the
structure of the shield of Limulus.

In 1889, the author compared the arrangement of plates and sense organs
in the cephalic buckler of Cephalaspis and Pterichthys with those on the cephalo-

346 THE OSTRACODERMS AND THE MARINE ARACHNIDS.

thorax of certain trilobites, and contended that the ostracoderms were the connect-
ing links between the arachnids and true vertebrates; and in 1894 he pointed out
the extraordinary resemblance in the microscopic structure of the shield of Pteras-
pis and other ostracoderms and that of Limulus. These resemblances in the min-
ute structure of the shields were either ignored by later writers, or regarded as
mere coincidences, or as the results of mimicry or of “parallelism.”

Lankester, Woodward, Traquair, Rohon and others, agree in denying the
existence of arthropod characters to the pteraspids, apparently because of the
abundant evidence now available that Pteraspis is related to Cephalaspis, whose
ichthyic affinities have rarely been questioned, rather than because the arthropod
features of Pteraspis have been dispassionately considered and found wanting.

But within recent years there seems to be a growing tendency to doubt the
affinity between Pteraspis and Cephalaspis. Reis protests against their union,
and apparently Traquair is in doubt, treating them together largely as a matter of
convenience. Lankester in his earlier monograph states that “The heterostraci
are associated at present with the osteostraci because they are found in the same
beds, because they have, like Cephalaspis a large head shield, and because there is
nothing else with which to associate them.” More recently he has said (1897)
“There is absolutely no reason for regarding Cephalaspis as allied to Pteraspis
beyond that the two genera occur in the same rocks, and still less for concluding
that either has any connection with Pterichthys.” Zittel says, Vol. III, page 147,
“Mir scheinen die Beziehungen der Pteraspiden und Cephalaspiden nach Form
und Structur so entfernt dass beide besser als besondere Ordnungen betrachtet
werden.’”’ He remarks further on that while the cephalaspide certainly appear to
be ganoids, the position of the pteraspide is very doubtful.

Muscle Markings—In 1872, A. Kunth described in Cyathaspis integer a
series of six “flache Hécher,” situated on the under surface of the neural shield,
which he regarded as indications of segmentation. Lankester (1873), describes
similar impressions on the shield of Cyathapis banksii and believes that in both
cases they indicate the position of a series of branchial chambers. In Pteraspis
also, Lankester has described five narrow ridges, with four broad shallow
depressions between them, which radiate from the center of the inner surface
of the neural shield. They are perhaps best marked in Pteraspis crouchii and
P. rostratus. These markings I have explained as indications of the original
segmentation of the mesocephalon, produced in part by the attachment of strong
segmental muscles extending vertically from the inner surface of the neural shield,
either to a cartilaginous cranium, or to a series of gill-like, or jaw-like, segmental
appendages on the hemal side. (Fig. 244, 4.)

The following quotation illustrates the attitude of modern paleontologists
toward the ostracoderms. A. S. Woodward, in his text-book of Paleontology
(1898, page 5) states that “Nearly all the genera mimic in a curious manner
the contemporaneous eurypterids;’ and on page 24 of the Introduction, that
“The oldest ostracoderms, sometimes claimed as the immediate allies of the

HISTORICAL REVIEW. 347

crustacean or arachnid merostomata of the same period, are fundamentally differ-
ent from the latter in every character which admits of detailed comparison; they
are to be regarded merely as an interesting example of mimetic resemblance be-
tween organisms of two different grades adapted to live in the same way and
under precisely similar conditions.”

Surely no one knows the precise ‘‘way”’ or the precise conditions under
which these forms lived, or any probable advantage to be gained by one mimicing
the other. It would certainly be very remarkable if many members of one class
should mimic those of another, when the two classes were as fundamentally unlike
as the arthropods and vertebrates are supposed to be.

All the ostracoderms are said to “‘mimic” the eurypterids, because they
have a similar shape, similar cephalic appendages, shell covered orbits and mouth
parts, and a similar minute structure of the dermal armor. But such a resem-
blance is too intricate and far-reaching to be accounted for on the ground of
mimicry, or functional parallelism, or mere coincidence; it can only be explained
on the ground of genetic relationship.

Chamberlin and Salisbury have taken a less conservative position on this
question. In their recent text-book of Geology, it is stated, Vol. II, page 482:

No more suggestive combination of ancient life is presented by the geological
record than that which is found in these supposed fresh water deposits. The
type was foreshadowed by the eurypterids and fishes, of fish-like forms, that
appeared in the closing stages of the Silurian, but the record of that time is too
imperfect to disclose its deeper significance. Even with the much superior
material of the Devonian period, the more profound significance is only just
beginning to be realized. The center of interest is a unique group of ostracoderms
which were at first interpreted as placoderm fishes, and later classed with the
jawless fishes (agnatha, lampreys, etc.), but which seem now to be clearly proven
to be an entirely distinct class lying between the arthropods and vertebrates, and
having some of the characteristics of each, but not truly belonging to either. Their
supreme interest lies in the force they give to the suggestion that the vertebrates
sprang from the arthropods.

CHAPTER XX.

THE OSTRACODERMS.

The ostracoderms, as we have seen, constitute a class of animals standing
midway between the most primitive vertebrates and the merostome-like arachnids.
They are now entirely extinct and only a few representatives have come down
to us in the form of fossils that are well enough preserved to afford either full or
precise information about them. The recognizable remains usually agree in the
minute structure of their exoskeleton, but there is a great diversity in the form
and general anatomy of the better known representatives of the class, showing
that it must have been a very large one.

The ostracoderms were not a dominant class. Some of them were nearly
or quite blind, their powers of locomotion were limited, and their mouth parts
were feeble and ill adapted for attack or defense. In all that constitutes active
resourceful animals they were less effective, and estimated for that alone, were
less highly organized than their immediate predecessors. The reason for this is
obvious enough if we accept the conclusions in the preceding chapters, and the
fact that they do present this condition is, in itself, important evidence that those
conclusions are correct. The ostracoderms, as our theory demands, were transi-
tional forms; they were in a phase of structural readjustment that had a definite
course to run before either a condition of organic stability could be attained or a
high degree of functional adaptation to external conditions could be acquired.
They were in, as it were, the pupal period in the phylogeny of the vertebrates.
The period was one of suspended efficiency, because great internal changes were
taking place and the functional relations of the whole organism to the outer world
were necessarily reduced to a minimum. A new type of exoskeleton was form-
ing; the lateral eyes, but newly transferred to the walls of a hollow brain, had not
fully regained their relations to the outer world; paired enteric diverticula opened
to the exterior by newly formed visceral clefts; the oral arches for the first time had
been transferred to the hemal surface of the head, a new mouth formed; and the
old one closed; and the locomotor functions were about to be shifted from the
cephalic appendages to the newly acquired flexible trunk, with its greatly in-
creased number of segments. At no other period of organic evolution were so
many important internal readjustments taking place at the same time, and no other
great class of animals has so quickly run its gamut of changes and so completely
disappeared in the process of giving birth to a new race.

This is as it should be, for it will be seen that the most important events were
of the open or shut variety that permit no intermediate stages; when they do occur
they at once create totally different conditions, to which the organism must
respond by a correspondingly rapid readjustment elsewhere, or go out of existence.

348

SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BODY. 349

The ostracoderms probably rose from the merostomes during the Ordovician,
and reached their highest development in the upper Silurian, after which they
rapidly declined, disappearing at the close of the Devonian.

The first recognizable ostracoderm to appear in America is Paleaspis, from
the lower Silurian of Perry Co., Penn. (Fig. 244, B and C.)

Walcott has described fragments of bony plates from the lower Trenton
horizon of the Ordovician, Colorado, the primitive character of which is shown by
the pronounced lamination of the outer dentinal layers.’ But evidence based on
such fragments, however well preserved, is inconclusive since, as we have seen in
Chapter XVI, there is no way to distinguish fragments of the exoskeleton of a
primitive ostracoderm from those of the higher marine arachnids.

The ostracoderms, like their arachnid ancestors, are small, usually a few
inches long. Two isolated species only attain a length of one and a half or
possibly two feet. They inhabited shallow waters, and crawled clumsily, oral
side down, over or through soft muddy bottoms, or swam heavily, oral side
up, with spasmodic strokes of their oar-like cephalic appendages, aided by
the more flexible posterior portions of the slender trunk and tail. They probably
fed on minute organisms sifted out of the mud or water, or on the soft parts of
plants, or on decomposing organic matter.

Most ostracoderms have large, rounded, or pointed heads, a small trunk, and
a tail consisting of a narrow terminal ribbon, or filament, with a ventral lobe some
distance in front of the end.

* * * * * * Be * *

Subdivisions of the Body.—The body may be divided into a procephalon,
mesocephalon, branchiocephalon, trunk and tail.

The procephalon, which may form a narrow projecting rostrum, contains on
its neural surface the median and lateral eyes and the olfactory organs. It
is intimately united with the mesocephalon, to which belong the oral arches, or
jaws, and the oar-like cephalic appendages.

The branchiocephalon may be separated from the mesocephalon by a distinct
hinge joint (antiarcha), or by a transverse furrow or scar (cephalaspide). It
contains six to eight pairs of gills, usually enclosed in a large peribranchial, or
atrial chamber, that is covered on all sides, except the posterior, by large
dermal plates. The right and left sides of the chamber are continuous on the
ventral side, but are separated along the mid dorsal line by the tough tissues that
suspend the branchial portion of the head to the inner surface of the branchial
shield. The cloaca may open into the posterior part of the peribranchial chamber,
its materials being discharged with the water of respiration from the posterior
opening. (Bothriolepis.) The viscera, stomach, intestines and reproductive
organs lie anterior to the cloacal opening, in that part of the head and trunk en-
closed within the atrial chamber. (Bothriolepis). In the cephalaspide there is

1Walcott, Bull. Geol. Soc., Vol Ul

350 THE OSTRACODERMS.

no closed peribranchial chamber, the gills probably lying on the oral surface,
beneath the posterior part of the mesocephalon. (Fig. 232.)

The trunk is short and slender, generally triangular in cross-section. It may
be practically naked, or provided with minute, scattered tubercles only (Bothrio-
lepis); or covered with rounded, overlapping scales (Pterichthys); or with large
segmentally arranged oblong plates on the neural surface, and small irregular
ones on the hemal side (Cephalaspis) ; or with shagreen-like denticles (ccelolepide).
There are one, or two, unpaired dorsal fins, stiffened by delicate internal rays
(Bothriolepis), or by minute oblong dermal plates (Cephalaspis). Pectoral and
pelvic fins are absent.

Lateral Fold.—A narrow fold extends along the ventro-lateral margins of the
trunk. It may be entirely membranous (Bothriolepis); or supported by minute
rays (Pterichthys and one species of Cephalaspis); or it may be formed by the pro-
jecting ends of segmental trunk plates (Tremataspis); or it may consist of a series
of segmentally arranged, separately movable, appendage-like plates, or fringing
processes (Cephalaspis).

The Cephalic Appendages.—Large, oar-like cephalic appendages form one
of the most striking features of the ostracoderms. In Bothriolepis they are at-
tached to the posterior hemal margin of the mesocephalon, in front of the gills,
and consist of two joints, or segments, covered with bony plates. ‘They are hollow,
triangular in cross-section, and contain indications of a cartilage axis. (Fig. 257.)
An opening on the posterior proximal end of the arm, and an adjacent one on the
side of the branchiocephalon, serve for the passage of nerves, blood-vessels, and
other tissues.

In Cephalaspis the cephalic appendages are covered with minute, semi-isolated
dermal plates, and their broad distal ends, of undetermined contour, are horizon-
tally flattened. Parts of armored cephalic appendages similar to those of Bothrio-
lepis have been found in Paleaspis, Cyathaspis, Tremataspis, and Psamosteus. In
Pteraspis, Drepanaspis, and Berkenia, there are certain marginal notches, or open-
ings, that have been considered as lateral eye orbits, but which may possibly
represent the points of attachment of cephalic appendages. In these genera they
were smaller, less heavily armored, if they were armored at all, and were not used
as swimming oars.

The cephalic appendages of the ostracoderms are not comparable with the
pectoral fins of vertebrates, but with one of the pairs of thoracic swimming legs
of the merostomata. ‘They are represented in vertebrates by the so-called “ bal-
ancers,” and the cephalic tentacles of amphibian larve, and by similar processes
in certain fishes, z.e., Protopterus, Accipenser and Bdellostoma.

Jaws.—The mouth lies in a membranous portion of the hemal surface, cau-
dad to the projecting rostrum, or to the anterior margin of the procephalon. In
Bothriolepis, there are three pairs of bony plates, which represent, in part, the
premaxillary, maxillary, and mandibular arches of vertebrates.

The maxillary arch is probably represented by the small movable plates (Figs.

JAWS. SKELETON. 351

254,259, mx.) The broad premaxille, p.ma., have heavy crushing margins on their
median ends, and move laterally to and from the mouth, which lies in the median
line between them. The mandibles (Fig. 254, md.), are narrow, curved, and
pointed at their median ends, and form a thick bony covering to a hollow axial por-
tion that probably consisted of cartilages. ‘They move diagonally forward and in-
ward, and backward and outward, pushing or scooping the food forward between
the premaxille and toward the mouth, m. Behind the mandibles, om., the cir-
cumoral membrane is stiffened by two thin bands of bone which probably rep-
resent the dermal armor of the hyoid arches.

In Tremataspis (Fig. 237), the oral region is occupied by flat polygonal plates,
showing little resemblance to jaws. They are arranged in four transverse rows,
which possibly represent the premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular, and two rows
of hyoid plates seen in Bothriolepis.

In Cephalaspis there are indications of one pair of large crushing jaws. The
jaws of other members of the ostracoderms probably resemble those of Bothrio-
lepis or Tremataspis, but no traces of them have as yet been found.

The Skeleton.—The ostracoderms were no doubt provided with cranial
cartilages, including an endocranium and a notochord, but they were not volumi-
nous or resistant, for in Bothriolepis no certain traces of them can be seen, although
the skin and other soft parts are clearly indicated. In sections of the branchio-
cephalon small black rings are sometimes seen, mingled with the blackened rem-
nants of the gills and viscera, that may be fragments of the notochord sheath.

The chief interest lies in the bony exoskeleton, which presents a structure in-
termediate between the chitenous epidermal skeleton of arthropods and the der-
mal skeleton of vertebrates.

In a primitive ostracoderm, the general character of the external armor is
similar to that of a trilobite, or a merostome, in that it may consist of an almost
continuous shell, or buckler, for the broad cephalic and branchial regions, and seg-
mentally arranged plates, corresponding with the pleural and tergal plates, on
the flanks and dorsal surface of the trunk. The dorsal fin, all but the terminal
part of the tail, and the ventral surface of the trunk, may be covered with
minute oblong plates similar in structure and surface ornament to the larger ones.
(Cephalaspis.)

In its simplest condition, the matrix of the dermal skeleton consisted of paral-
lel, or concentric lamelle, that apparently have been formed in the same manner as
the characteristic lamelle in chitenous exoskeletons. It is unlike chiten chemically,
but resembles it in the varying degree of hardness, color, and other optical proper-
ties of the lamelle, and in the presence of innumerable, parallel, unbranched
canals (pore canals, or primitive dentinal tubules) which everywhere penetrate the
matrix at right angles to the lamelle.

The exoskeleton usually consists of three principal layers consisting of a bony
or dentine-like substance: a. an inner one of horizontal lamelle; b. a middle one
of large polygonal spaces, or cancelle, and c. an outer layer consisting mainly of

352 THE OSTRACODERMS.

dentine, with an underlying stratum of Haversian, or other, canals. The lamelle
are always parallel to, or concentric with, the walls of the cancellz, or with those
of the larger spaces they enclose. Openings through the inner layer serve for the
passage of blood-vessels and other tissues into the cancelle, and hence to the canals
of the outer layer.

The outer surface is denser and harder than the rest, and may be without
distinct dentinal tubules or lamella, thus forming a thin enamel, or ganoin layer.
It is often divided into small polygonal areas, and is variously ornamented with
tubercles or ridges.

The most primitive lacune are unipolar, or bipolar, and arise as -dilata-
tions of the inner ends of primitive pore canals (Pteraspis); or a linear series of
lacune may be formed from local enlargements of a single canal (Tremataspis).
The more highly developed, or typical bone lacune, arise from the unipolar
lacune through the formation of secondary lateral canals, or canaliculi. The
primitive lacune are located mainly, and primarily, in the deeper lamellz: that is,
in the axial portions of the trabecul, and in the partitions separating the cancelle
and larger canals. As the lacune develop in size and complexity, they lose their
original arrangement and their relation to pore canals, taking up their position
between the lamelle, with their long axes parallel with one another and with the
plane of the lamelle, those in one layer often standing at right angles to those in
the adjacent layers. The lacune of the same and of the adjacent layers are then
united by many branching canaliculi. As the latter increase in numbers, they
form an anastomosing network that takes the place of the primitive unbranched and
parallel pore canals. The primitive condition of the pore canals is, however,
largely retained in the outermost layers of the shell, forming the dentine layers
characteristic of the surface ridges, spines, and tubercles. .

* * a * * * * * *

The general trend of development in the exoskeleton of the ostracoderms
is as follows:

1. The lacune become parallel with the lamellz, instead of with the pore
canals.

2. They increase in number, and their numerous canaliculi replace the
primitive pore canals.

3. The cancelli break down, owing largely to the increasing number of vascu-
lar channels (Haversian canals) and their more uniform distribution throughout
the various layers, this process gradually producing a condition similar to that
in the typical dermal bones of vertebrates.

4. The armor breaks up into separate plates or “bones” of various sizes,
which may or may not be movably articulated, and which may bear some defi-
nite relation to the underlying organs, such as the primitive subdivisions of the
head, or the arrangement of segmental muscles, appendages, or jaws; or they

THE EVOLUTION OF THE EXOSKELETON. 353

may possibly have some relation to the plates that are present in the cephalothorax
and branchial regions in their trilobite- or merostome-like ancestors.

5. The armor may also break up into small polygonal platelets, of uniform
size, that are quite separate from one another, the lines of fragmentation following
the “ornamental” polygonal markings visible on the outer surface of the shield
in Limulus, (Fig. 200, A.C.D.), in Cephalaspis, or in Ateleaspis. (Fig. 200, B.)

6. With this process of fragmentation there is a tendency to accentuate
the difference between the inner layers of more highly developed bony tissue,
and the outer layers that still retain their primitive stratification and parallel pore
canals, and into which neither the bone cells nor the vascular canals have pene-
trated to any great extent. The isolated ridges, spines, or tubercles of the outer
layer, initiate the dermal denticles of the vertebrates, and represent their enamel
and dentinal caps; the lower layers initiate the basilar plates composed of true
dermal bone. (Fig. 208.)

7. During the phylogenetic process of fragmentation the two layers may
undergo unequal development. In such forms as the ccelolepide (Thelodus and
Lanakia) apparently only the isolated epidermal denticles are retained, while
the underlying network of bony plates and trabecule has largely, or wholly,
disappeared. In Bothriolepis and related forms, the dentinal layer is scanty,
or for the most part absent, while the large bony lamelle of the inner and middle
layers are highly developed. In the pteraspidian section all three layers are
present, but the underlying ones have no true bone cells, only the spindle-like
dilatations of the pore canals.

8. In the antiarcha, as in the vertebrates, the placoid bones were extensively,
if not entirely, covered with a layer of epidermal cells. This is indicated not
only by their general structure, but is conclusively demonstrated by the faint
impressions on their outer surface left there by the nuclei.

9. The dentinal layer of the unfragmented buckler and of the isolated den-
ticles, like the exoskeleton of arthropods and the enamel of vertebrate teeth, was
probably the product solely of underlying epidermal cells. Their outer surface
was probably never covered with epithelial cells, except by secondary over-
growths resulting from infoldings like those in the developing teeth of vertebrates.

to. A remarkable feature of the cephalaspide is the union of the margins of
the upper and lower shields by anastomosing bony trabecule which, like those in
Limulus, form the solid, or cancellous cornua, and the heavy hoop-like margin
along the front and sides of the cephalic shield.

In Eukeraspis (Fig. 235, D) there are peculiar chambers (marginal cells of
Lankester), in the bony tissue on the anterior margin of the shield. They may
be merely enlarged cancellz, or possibly, enclosures formed by a deeply serrated
or scalloped margin like that in Thyestes, A, or like the enclosures formed by
marginal infoldings in the trilobites, B.

tr. In Cephalaspis (Fig. 232), there are conspicuous oval areas on the lateral
margins, and behind the orbits, that are formed by thickened patches of bony

23

THE OSTRACODERMS.

354

They correspond roughly with the areas in Limulus where the bony

trabecule.

(Fig. 205.) In Tremataspis, Cephalaspis,

trabecule are most highly developed.

S
N

“en.

SZ,

Sai raat

of

SS
or se
ec ap

Based mainly on

A, From the side; B, from the hemal surface.

Fic, 232.—Restoration of Cephalaspis,

C. murchisoni.

and Thyestes, these areas are covered with loose, superficial, polygonal plates
which may, and usually do, fall out, leaving sharply defined, shallow openings

in the outer layers.

(Figs. 235, A, 236, B.) They have a floor consisting of

THE EYES. 355

bony trabecule belonging to the inner layer. There are no indications that
special organs, sensory or otherwise, were located in these openings.

The Eyes.—The parietal and lateral eyes, whenever their position can be
certainly determined, are located, with the olfactory organs, on the median dorsal
portion of the cephalic buckler, forming in the antiarcha and aspidocephali a
very characteristic group.

The lateral eyes in these families are remarkable. They are contained in
spherical chambers, the floor and sides of which are formed of a basket work of
bony trabecule similar to those in Limulus. (Tremataspis, Cephalaspis Figs.
233, A, B, 239, A.) They are situated on short bony stalks that could be lowered
into the chamber, or the distal ends of the stalks could be raised, exposing the
convex surface of the oval or kidney-shaped cornea. (Fig. 239.) The latter is
covered by a thin shell that appears to be an extension of the dermal armor;
it is convex and smooth, and in life no doubt it was transparent (Tremataspis
and Cephalaspis).

Fic. 233.—A, Cross-section through the thoracic shield of Limulus, showing the location of the principal patches
of bony trabecule; B, section through the head of Cephalaspis showing the bony trabecule encasing the lateral
eyes, the thickened margin, and a part of the hemal wall of the shield; C, fringing processes of C. lyelli; D, same
of C. pagei; F’, cross-section of the trunk of C. lyelli.

In the pteraspidian and anaspidian sections, and in Ateleaspis, the lateral
eyes are apparently absent, or covered by a thick skeletal layer that, as in young
lampreys, effectively conceals their location.

The apparent absence of the lateral eyes in certain ostracoderms is very
significant. There is no reason to suppose that the forms without lateral eyes
were cave animals, or deep sea animals, or that they belonged to an eyeless stock.
The unusually large size of the median eye tubercle, or fossa, and the well devel-
oped lateral eyes in their immediate relatives, is sufficient evidence to the contrary.
The temporary suppression of such ancient organs as the lateral eyes is best ex-
plained on the assumption that they are in a metamorphic, or transitional, condi-
tion, midway between the lateral eyes of arthropods, which remain outside the

356 THE OSTRACODERMS.

medullary tube, and the cerebral eyes of vertebrates that have been carried into
it during the early stages of development. Those ostracoderms in which the
lateral eyes appear to be absent are to be regarded as the ones whose newly-
formed cerebral eyes (phylogenetically speaking) have not become functionally
adjusted to their new environment. The concealed lateral eyes of larval cyclo-
stomes are in a similar condition, and they are to be explained in a similar manner.
See Chapter IX.

The parietal eye was relatively large, and was lodged in a deep pit on the
under side of a projecting tubercle of the cephalic buckler (pteraspidians), or on
the under side of a small movable plate, lying between the lateral eyes, (Tremataspis,
Cephalaspis, and Bothriolepis). In Bothriolepis there are two additional pits on
the inner surface of the postorbital plate, that probably contained another pair of
parietal ocelli. (Figs. 252, 253, 255.)

The olfactory organs were probably located in a hypophysis-like median sac,
situated just in front of the orbits. In Tremataspis, Cephalaspis, and Thyestes,
the oval opening to the sac lies at the bottom of a shallow depression, that may be
a little deeper on either side. In Bothriolepis there is a small movable, T-shaped
plate (Fig. 255, e), that stands nearly vertically in the large opening common to the
median and lateral eyes. To the outer ends of the plate are attached two con-
cave, lateral wings, /.e., that appear to have partly enclosed the olfactory organs.
A narrow canal leads outward from each chamber, opening to the exterior just
in front of the top of the plate.

Auditory Organs.—In Tremataspis and Bothriolepis there are two small,
sharply defined openings, situated close together in the occipital region, which
probably represent the outer ends of endolymphatic ducts.

In Bothriolepis, when seen either in sections or dissections, they lose their
sharply defined walls just below the outer surface, and open into irregular cham-
bers that may lead either into the cancellous tissue or into the interior. There are
no definite openings corresponding to them on the inner surface of the shell, but
in etched heads there may be present a conspicuous spur representing the cast
of the inner opening. (Fig. 252.) In ’Tremataspis, the canals lead into small bony
tubes that project some distance from the inner surface of the shield. In Cyathas-
pis there are two V-shaped ridges in this region, that have been regarded as the
surface indications of semi-circular canals.

The ducts are in some way related to the lateral line organs, for in young
specimens of Bothriolepis they mark the median termination of the orbital lines.

Cutaneous Sense Organs.—A system of cutaneous sense organs is fully and
clearly mapped out in Tremataspis and Bothriolepis. In the former (Fig. 236),
each line consists of a series of short, shallow grooves on the smooth outer surface
of the shell. <A circumorbital line, a.m, postorbital, p.0, occipital oc, a posterior
branchial, ».b, and a lateral line p.m, are represented. The occipital lines lead
toward the endolymphatic pores described above. No grooves occur on the ven-

THE CUTANEOUS SENSE ORGANS. 357

tral side, except for a short line, or dash, on one or two of the oral plates. (Fig.
237, A.)

In Bothriolepis the lines form continuous shallow grooves. (Figs. 247, 248.)
One line extends from the infra-orbital across the front of the head; there is a
V-shaped orbital line connected with the occipital pores, and one on the dorsal sur-
face of the branchial shield; another extends onto the ventral surface, across the
maxillary plates, probably connecting with the line on the premaxillary plates;
while a lateral line extends along the sides of the branchial shield and appears to be
continuous with a furrow extending along the sides of the fleshy trunk.

3
if
4
4
tw
f
y

140 SCRE PE

Fic. 234.—A small species of Cephalaspis, sp.? associated with Bothriolepis, from Miguasha, Bay Chaleur, P. Q.
About natural size. A, From side; B, hemal surface; C, cross-section of the trunk; D, sagittai section of the head
E, cross-section of the head. In B, a heavy bony ridge is seen, b, that probably divides the oral from the bron-
chial chamber. From specimens in the author's collection.

In Pteraspis and Paleaspis there are scattered dash-like markings on the
outer surface similar to those of Tremataspis, but less regularly arranged. There
is also a special system of canals lying within the shell, the distribution of which
is imperfectly known; they may perhaps represent closed lateral line canals
(Tremataspis, Pteraspis, and Paleaspis)

In Ateleaspis, nov.sp, from Dalhousie, sensory grooves are present similar to
those in Tremataspis, but located on a narrow ridge. The infra-orbital, the ant-
orbital, and the anterior end of the lateral line, are indicated. (Fig. 242.)

358 THE OSTRACODERMS.

The prevailing position of the lateral line organs on the neural surface of the
head, where they are out of touch with the food or surrounding objects, is only
intelligible on the assumption that they represent the remnants of the gustatory
and tactile organs that were located on the neural surface of the head, in their
arachnid-like ancestors. See Chapter VII, p. 121.

The ostracoderms may be divided into the following orders:

Fic. 235.—Cephalic bucklers of Ostrocoderms and marine arachnids. A, Head of Thyestes; B, Odonto-
cephalus; C, Corycephalus; D, Eukeraspis. Silurian.

I. ASPIDOCEPHALI.

Head, thin, broad. Trunk and tail, narrow and small. Exoskeleton form-
ing a continuous cephalic buckler; trunk plates separate, segmentally arranged.
Outer surface of dermal armor, smooth, or with low rounded tubercles on poly-
gonal areas, that may separate into small, five- or six-sided plates. Marginal and
central openings on the dorsal mesocephalic shield, filled with loose polygonal
plates belonging to the outer layer only. Olfactory, or hypophyseal opening, not
enclosed in the orbital foramen.

Cephalaspidz.—The head is shield-shaped, rounded or pointed in front, and
with thickened margin; posterior margin expanded, cornuate. Oral region is a
small membranous area in the center of the thin, convex, hemal wall. The
branchiocephalic shield, small, indistinctly segmented; hemal branchial shield
absent. Gills not enclosed in an atrial chamber. Large cephalic appendages

THE ASPIDOCEPHALI. 359

attached to the under side of mesocephalon, median to the cornua; flexible, with
terminal horizontal expansions. Trunk membranous, or covered with segment-
ally arranged plates, with twenty-five to thirty pairs of separately movable, appen-
dage-like, fringing processes. Lateral eyes, prominent, median. Caudal axis
straight, ending in slender filament. Ventral lobe of caudal fin, narrow and sub-
terminal. Upper Silurian to upper Devonian.

Cephalaspis (Figs. 232, 233, 234); Eukeraspis (Fig. 235, D); Thyestis (Fig.
235, A); fringing plates (Fig. 233, C, D, E).

Fic. 236.—Restoration of Tremataspis, seen from the neural surface, and showing the location of the principal sense
organs, canal organs, and appendages. X about 1 1/2.

Tremataspidz.—Dorsal and ventral shields of the mesocephalon and branch-
iocephalon united to form an oblong, lenticular buckler. Parietal eye plate free.
Small, 2-3 in. long. The best known form is Tremataspis Schmidti, whose
polished yellow shields are beautifully preserved in fine grained chalky rocks of
the upper Silurian in the island of Oesel, Baltic sea.

Exoskeleton.—Divided into the usual three layers; outer surface nearly smooth,
polished. Cancelle, somewhat irregular, small. Two sets of horizontal canals,
forming networks just below the outer layer. In one set, the canals are of varying

360 THE OSTRACODERMS.

/

/

caliber, and terminate in coarse, dentinal canals that dilate at intervals, forming /

in the outer shell layer vertical rows of multipolar lacune; inwardly they lead into
the cancelle, and hence via coarse vertical canals, through the basal layer inte
the head. The second set are uniform in diameter and open outwardly by clear-
cut conical chimneys. (Fig. 205.)

Fic. 237.—Restoration of Tremataspis, seen from the hemal surface, and showing the arrangement of the circum-
oral plates, X about 1 1/2,

Oral Region.—There is a large opening on the anterior hemal part of the
head, near the center of which lies the mouth. (Fig. 237.) It is surrounded by
close-fitting plates, seldom preserved in place. The opening in which these
plates belong is bounded in front and on the sides by the narrow, overturned rim of
the neural shield. On the anterior rim is a triangular, ill defined plate, adhering

Bui Cate

Fic. 238.—Photograph of the orbital region of the shield of Tremataspis. x about 3.

to the inner surface of the neural shield. It has a median, oval ridge 0), with a
roughened or porous texture. On either side is a polished, conical projection
of the narrow rim, a. On the lateral and posterior margins of the opening are
eight or nine pairs of thick-lipped, semi-circular incisions, whose concave surface
is conspicuously porous. There are corresponding incisions on the adjacent

THE TREMATASPID &. 361

oral plates, thus forming a regular series of openings leading into the interior
and increasing in size from behind forward.

The oral plates form four or five transverse rows, the form of the smallest and
most anterior ones being imperfectly known. In the only known specimen that
has the plates in position, the large anterior pair were crushed and broken.
What appears to be one of the same plates has been found isolated and intact.

Fic. 239.—Cross-section of the orbits of Tremataspis, showing the movable lateral eye stalks, the parietal eye,
the network of bony trabecule forming the floor of the median and lateral eye chambers, and the extension of the
dermal armor over the corneal surface of the lateral eyes. Semi-diagrammatic. Xx about 7 1/2.

It has a small rounded notch at one end, and appears to represent the premaxil-
lary of Bothriolepis, although its form does not suggest a jaw plate. None of the
remaining plates resemble those of Bothriolepis.

The exact location of the mouth is uncertain. It was probably in the ill-de-
fined triangular depression between the premaxillary plates. In any case it
must have been very small and narrow.

The lateral eyes were on short stalks that could be raised above the level of the

d

Fic. 240.—Bony plate from the neural surface of the basal joint of a cephalic appendage of Tremataspis. A,
External surface, showing a circular groove in the polished outer layer, made by striking the edge of the shield
in the swimming movements of the appendages; d, neck of the plate, attached by flexible membranes to one of the
openings on the hemal margin of the shield; B, inner surface of the plate. X, 10.

shell, or lowered into the large spherical orbits, the floor of which consisted of a
basket work of bony trabecule. ‘The entire outer surface of the eye stalk and
the front of the eye itself was covered with a thin layer of the exoskeleton. (Figs.
238-239.)

The marginal and post-orbital openings were originally filled with thin poly-
gonal plates; but the latter are usually absent, leaving shallow depressions with
scalloped margins, the floor consisting of the modified inner layer of the shell.

362 THE OSTRACODERMS.

Fig. 238 shows a photograph of a head in which the plates are retained in their
proper place.

Sections of the whole buckler show that the lateral margins of the upper and
lower shields were united by bony trabeculz, and that two plate-like entapophyses
projected from the inner surface of the dorsal shield, that probably served for the
attachment of muscles. (Fig. 236, 7.)

The lateral line organs consist of short, shallow grooves separate in the younger
specimens, but united into longer grooves in the older ones. There is a circum-
orbital, lateral, occipital, and a posterior dorsal line. Short, sensory grooves
occur on some of the isolated oral plates.

Appendages.—Associated with the remains are certain plates that have the
same peculiar texture as the shields, and which undoubtedly represent portions
of the armored appendages. A complete distal joint has been found. (Fig. 241.)

Fic. 241.—C, D, E, Distal joint of a cephalic appendage of Tremataspis; C, hemal; D, median; E, neural
surface; F, appendage of some unknown animal associated with the remains of Trematapsis. It consists of five
or more joints. A part of the large distal joint has broken off, exposing the impression of the outer surface, that
was marked by faint transverse ridges. Superficially, the shell covering the joints resembles that of Tremataspis.
Seen from the inside. X 9.

It is oblong, with a broad, partly membranous, posterior surface, a scalloped
anterior edge, and an articular process at its proximal end. A convex, heart-
shaped plate was also found that represents the dorsal part of the proximal
joint. (Fig. 240.) It was attached by a narrow roughened collar probably to
the larger anterior marginal incision. In each of the three known specimens of
this plate the polished outer surface is cut by a semicircular groove, showing
where it struck against the margin of the shield in the forward and backward
movement of the arms. (Fig. 240.) There is no place where such plates could
be attached to the body or head except in the larger anterior incisions. They
fit in this position fairly well and in this position they agree with the corre-
sponding parts of the cephalic appendages of Bothriolepis.

The smaller, more posterior incisions or openings may have served for the

THE ATELEASPID &. 363

attachment, or for the exit of other organs of a similar nature, as for example
external gills.

Fragments of what appear to be smaller appendages, covered with a thin
calcareous shell, have been found in the same deposits. They have a large,
flattened, terminal joint and two or three small segments, or joints, with
the surface raised into prominent peaks. (Fig. 241, F.) There is no other clue
to their origin. They may possibly represent the distal portion of the cephalic
arms of Thyestes or of some unknown arthropod.

Ateleaspida.—Head rounded, with heavy thickened margin; cornua trun-
cated. Entire body covered with small, five- or six-sided plates, ornamented with
bands or radiating lines, or canals, and with low rounded and polished tubercles

Fic. 242.—Ateleaspis. A, Fragment, showing surface ornament, magnified; B, neural surface of head and
part of the trunk, showing parts of the ‘‘lateral line’’ ridges, marked by a narrow sinuous groove. Atv.m. the shell
is absent, displaying a cast of the broad, flat hemal margin, ornamented with prominent rounded tubercles.
(From Miguasha, Bay Chaleur, P.Q. About 2/3 natural size.)

of varying size. (Fig. 200, B, 242, A.) No orbits. Sensory canals on trunk
and head, consisting of zig-zag, or interrupted grooves on a low narrow ridge.
Upper Silurian of England; Devonian of Miguasha, P. Q. Canada.

I possess a fairly well preserved example of this very rare family, that was
obtained from the gray cliffs of Miguasha, and which probably represents a new
species. The greater part of the head is preserved and shows no trace of orbits.
(Fig. 242.) The hemal side of the thickened rim was broad, sharply marginate,
and studded with large tubercles. A lateral line groove extends well back onto the
flanks, and there are traces of a rostral and an anterior transverse line. The
trunk, as far as preserved, was covered with small five- or six-sided plates.

This genus is of special importance, since it shows us an undoubted cephal-

304 THE OSTRACODERMS.

aspid, probably without orbits, and in which the exoskeleton tends to break
up into separate polygonal plates, which correspond to the polygonal areas on
the continuous shield of Limulus and Cephalaspis. (Fig. 199.)

II. Tur ANASPIDA.

The anaspida include a small number of obscure forms. They were com-
pletely covered with small dentinal plates, without multipolar lacunz, which prob-
ably represented the fragmented outer layer of the primitive exoskeleton. Orbits

A WLADEIBIRORIISae 6c

SE ea ee
See LLL
SS FF .

Fic. 243.—-A, Restored outlines of Lasanius problematicus, Traq; B, Birkenia elegans, Traq; C, Thelodus
scoticus Traq.; D, Lanarkia spinosa Traq.; E, sagittal section of a primitive dermal denticle (Ccelolepis Schmidti)
A-D, after Traquair; E after Rohon.

may be covered with bony plates. Small marginal openings indicate the
location of gill clefts or the points of attachment of the cephalic appendages.

Ccelolepideze.—Resembling somewhat the cephalaspids in form, and covered
with separate rounded, or conical, denticles. Upper Silurian, passage beds.
Thelodus. (Fig. 243, C.) lLanarkia. (Fig. 243, D.)

Birkeniidz.—Fishlike contour, with oblong tuberculate plates. A series of
branchial openings, like those in Tremataspis. Birkenia. (Fig. 243, B.) La-
sanius. (Fig. 243, A.)

III. Prerasprpa.

Head sagittate, or oval, consisting of a small number of large plates.
Subdivisions of head united, forming a common cephalic buckler without

THE PTERASPIDA. 365

Fic. 244.—A, Restored outline of the cephalic shield and cephalic appendages of Cyathaspis, seen from the
neural surface, based largely on Lindstrom’s specimen from the Silurian rocks of Gothland; B and C, partly restored
outlines of two individuals of Paleaspis (male and female?)from Perry Co., Pa. The shell has been removed, showing
a cast of the inner neural surface. About natural sice.

Fic. 245.—Cephalic buckler of Pteraspis, neural surface. (After Lankester,slightly modified) About natural size

366 THE OSTRACODERMS.

lateral eye openings. Gills enclosed in peribranchial, or atrial chamber. Mouth
parts unknown. Body plates small, rhomboidal.

Pteraspidee.—Dermal armor ornamented with minute dentinal ridges and
grooves, parallel with the margins of the various plates. Matrix sharply laminate,
with numerous unbranched, parallel pore canals, terminating in spindle-shaped
unipolar lacune. Cancelle large, rectangular, and in a single layer. Parietal
eye lodged in a hollow tubercle, prominent externally, and with the cavity opening

Fic. 246.—Restoration of Drepanaspis gemundenensis, Schl. (After Traquair; slightly modified.) A, Hamal
surface; B, neural surface.

inward. Cephalic appendages, where known, large, armored. Oblong marginal
openings on dorsal surface of cornual plates leading into the interior of the head.
Upper Silurian and lower Devonian. Six tonineincheslong. Pteraspis. Kner.
(Fig. 245.) Paleaspis, Claypole. Oldest member of the ostracoderms known to
occur in America. Onondaga Group, Perry Co., Penn. (Fig. 244, B and C.)
Cyathaspis, Lank. (Fig. 244, A.)

Psamostedz.—Head, broad, flattened; trunk, short and thick. Ornament
minutely tubercular. Large plates of the head separated by rows of small,

THE ANTIARCHA. 367

five- or six-sided plates. Peribranchial chamber opening on the posterior lateral
side of the head, between the posterior lateral and the posterior ventro-lateral
plates. Devonian. Drepanaspis, Schliiter. (Fig. 246.)

IV. ANTIARCHA.

Head oval, pentagonal in cross-section. Mesocephalon united with branchio-
cephalon by a transverse, movable joint. Cephalic armor consisting of large
plates; separate, but with little or no movement. ‘Trunk slender, membranous
or scaly; triangular in cross-section, with distinct but narrow lateral folds. Two
dorsal fins, membranous, with or without supporting rays. Tail long, ending
inanarrow ribbon. Cancellze in one or many layers, often small and irregular.
Dermal armor ornamented with tubercles or, with concentric tuberculate ridges.
Dentine layer ill defined, thin, or absent. Lacune highly developed, multipolar,
and extending close to outer surface. Large atrial and pre-oral chambers.

* * * * * * * K *

The best known form is Bothriolepis canadensis, Whiteaves. The author
has secured a large number of these fossils, splendidly preserved. Large slabs
were obtained showing many entire individuals in their exact attitudes and
surroundings at the time of death. With this material at hand, which in abun-
dance and in perfection of preservation has never been equalled, it has been
possible to form a very accurate idea of the structure and mode of life of this
most interesting animal.

The details of its anatomy have been worked out by means of serial sections
and by other methods. They will be reserved for a separate publication; we
have space here for only the points of general interest, or those bearing on the
subject under discussion.

Exoskeleton.—The outer surface of the dermal armor was ornamented with
low rounded tubercles, arranged in concentric rows, often parallel to the margins
of the separate plates, or forming wavy, crenulate ridges.

The dorsal mesocephalic shield moves up and down, to a limited extent, on
the hinge-like joint connecting it with the branchiocephalon. This movement
is made possible by the tilting of the suspensory or suborbital plate, whose thick,
ventral edge rests on the anterior lateral margin of the fixed, ventral shield (an-
terior ventro-laterals). (Figs. 253, 5.0, 259, 4.) When the mesocephalon is de-
pressed, the dorsal edge of this plate swings inward, without dislocating the plate,
through an angle of almost forty-five degrees. In partly crushed heads it is
forced into an abnormal, horizontal position, and lies inside the head with its
lateral surface turned dorsally.

As the ventral edge of the suspensory plate fits into a shallow groove, or
ridge, its posterior end cannot normally swing bodily outward, after the fashion of
an operculum, as one might at first sight suppose. In fact, there is no passage-

368 THE OSTRACODERMS. :

way into the head at this place that could be opened and closed by the movements
of this plate, and there is no reason for regarding it, either functionally, or morpho-
logically, as an operculum.

Fic. 247.—Restoration of Bothriolepis canadensis (Whiteaves; from Miguasha, P. Q., Canada.) Neural surface;
about 1/2 natural size. ;

The anterior end of the suspensory plate is narrow and slightly curved,
and adjoins a small quadrangular, movable plate that probably represents the
maxillary plate of the arthrodira. In depressed heads, it is bent over onto the

Saeco

THE ANTIARCHA. 369

oral surface, and in side views it then appears to be absent. A branch of the
suborbital line extends over this plate, apparently connecting with the sensory
groove of the premaxilla. (Figs. 254, 262, mw.)

Fic. 248.—Restoration of Bothriolepis canadensis. (Whiteaves.) Hzemal surface. About 1/2 natural size.

The remaining plates of the pro- and meso-cephalic shield, except those
in the orbital opening, are practically immovable, and are frequently found as one
piece, even when all the other plates have separated through maceration.

The branchiocephalon enclosed the gills, atrial chamber, viscera, and repro-

24

370 THE OSTRACODERMS.

Fic. 249.—Photograph of a small group of Bothriolepis. The individual, a, after death, came to lie hemal
side up, on what was the bottom at that time; its dorsal fin and tail lie in a horizontal plane. Individuals, b andc.
died in their natural position; that is, buried in the mud, hemal side down Their dorsal fins and tail lobes are
in a nearly vertical position.

Fic. 250.—Photographs of Bothriolepis, seen from the hamal surface, showing the conspicuous membranous frills
surrounding the exhalent opening of the atrial chamber

THE ANTIARCHA.

ductive organs. The anterior part of the trunk
and the branchial portion of the head was sus-
pended from the roof of the branchiocephalic
shield by stout fibrous tissue attached to two
deep median processes, or ridges of cancellous
bone, that projected downward and forward
(Fig. 251, pr.) The sides and ventral surface,
were unattached and were surrounded by a
spacious peribranchial, or airial chamber, which
opened outward between the sides of the body
and the ventrolateral walls of the branchiocep-
halic buckler.

Atrial Frill—tThe lips of the atrial opening
were guarded by a membranous frill (Figs. 247,
248). Its ventral portion was broad, often folded
or pleated, and sometimes marked by faint, longi-
tudinal lines. It appears to project from the
inside of the chamber and to be attached to its
ventral wall by a faint transverse ridge. The
dorsal portion was much narrower, and appeared
to be a membranous extension of the posterior
and lateral margin of the shield. The contents
of the branchiocephalon are never squeezed out
of the posterior end of the buckler. Sections
of many different specimens always show the gills
and stomach in their proper position, even when
the shields are crushed almost flat. If the animal
lies ventral side down, the viscera always lie
on the ventral wall. If it died ventral side up,
they lie on the dorsal shield, and in all cases well
in front of the atrial opening.

Gills —Seven pairs of broad lamellate gills
were present on the sides of the head, in about
the center of the branchiocephalon. They
appear as seven pairs of thin, parallel, black
lines, somewhat wavy, with minute black spots.
(Fig. 256.) A more conspicuous dark band, or
a clear space, separates the gills of one side from
those of the other. Altogether they form an ob-
long nodule about an inch and a half to two
inches long, one inch broad, and from an eighth
to a quarter of an inch thick. The nodule
always consists of a peculiar fine-grained, soft

Fic. 251.—Semi-diagrammatic sagittal section of Bothriolepis, showing the location of the cloaca, gills, stomach, mouth, jaws, etc.

372 THE OSTRACODERMS.

matrix not visibly affected by acids. The part of the atrial chamber not
occupied by the remnants of the viscera is always filled with a coarse grained sand
that evidently worked its way in through the atrial opening after the animal died.
When treated with dilute acids, this sandy matrix becomes friable and can often
be easily worked away, exposing the contour of the gills and viscera.

Fic. 252.—Head of Bothriolepis. A, The bony cranial plates have been etched away, leaving a natural cast
of the inner, neural surface of the head; B, bony plates covering the neural surface of the head, seen from the
inside. The matrix has been chiseled away. Photographs; slightly restored.

Fic. 253.—Transverse sections of the head of Bothriolepis. The dermal bones black; the coarser, more sandy
matrix, dotted; the softer matrix of a chalky consistency, shaded. Slightly diagrammatic,

Viscera.—Above, or to one side of the gills was a large oblong stomach, the
contour of which was conspicuous, owing to its carbonized contents. The cloaca
was guarded by a thin rounded, cloacal scale that is faintly tuberculate on its free
or ventral surface and with concentric lines on its dorsal surface. The cloaca
opened into the posterior part of the atrial chamber about half an inch in front of
the posterior margin of the ventral shield. (Fig 251, c/.).

THE ANTIARCHA. 373

The pre-oral chamber lies on the anterior ventral surface; its rim is formed
by the anterior margins of the dorsal and ventral shields, which were apparently
fringed with short fleshy papilla. Across the roof of the opening there is a tough
circum-oral membrane in which are imbedded the large premaxillary plates,
the mandibles, and the two narrow bony bands that covered the hyoids. The
membrane extends backward, underneath the anterior ventro-laterals, as far as
the transverse ridge on their inner surface, to which it appears to be attached

(Fig. 251, 254, om.)

Fic. 254.—E, The oral region of Bothriolepis. On the right, the anterior ventro-lateral plates have been re-
moved exposing the dermal armor of the double hyoid arch, imbedded in the circumoral membrane. The latter is
continuous with the ridge, b, on the inner surface of the anterior ventro-laterals. A, The mandibles of Bothriolepis,
with the smooth, toothless margin rotated outwards; B, same, rotated inwards; C, longitudinal, vertical section,
a little to one side of the median line, showing the pre-maxillary and mandibular plates in their normal positions;
D, cross-section of the premaxille in the oral region, showing the thickened, crushing, or cutting edges of the
premaxillary plates.

The premaxille are thin, concave plates of dermal bone continuous with the
oral membrane on the sides and in front, but with free median and posterior
margins. (Fig. 254.) The exposed surface presents the characteristic surface
ornament, together with a sharply bent, sensory groove. The rounded posterior
margin is smooth and bevelled, ending in an extremely thin edge, nearly the
whole length of which is broken into minute irregular tooth-like serrations. The
median margin is very thick, with sharpened edges which in the older individuals
become rounded or smooth through use. The anterior margin has a prominent
shoulder; it is uniformly thin and rounded, and is continuous with the oral mem-
brane. The lateral margin is narrow and slightly concave; a broad spur extends

374 THE OSTRACODERMS.

laterally and inward on the visceral side of the oral membrane, serving, no doubt,
for the attachment of muscles, s.p.

The visceral aspect of the premaxille is nearly smooth, except for a very
prominent, transverse, sharp-edged ridge, which evidently served for the attach-
ment of muscles that moved them ina median or lateral direction. (Fig. 254,C.,77.)

The premaxille moved independently to and from the median line, bringing
their stout crushing or biting edges together. They are sometimes found in a
nearly vertical position, or even thrown forward in front of the head, with their
ventral surfaces facing dorsally. Thus it is probable that, like two great lids or
covers, they could swing forward and backward on the muscles and the mem-
brane attached to their anterior visceral surface; it is improbable that normally
they ever passed beyond the vertical position during life. (Fig. 251.)

Fic. 255.—The ocular and olfactory plates of Bothriolepis, enlarged. A part of the rostral and lateral plates have
been removed on the left, in order to expose the deeper lying sclerotics and the inner end of the ethmoid.

The mandibles are peculiar S-shaped plates lying behind, or more frequently
underneath, or dorsal to, the premaxille. (Figs. 248, 251, 254, md.) The
median end of each mandible has a smooth, rounded, anterior, or ventral edge,
and a finely ornamented, convex outer surface. Its visceral surface is deeply
concave. ‘The lateral arm of the mandible is narrow and smooth and lies inside
the oral membrane.

The mandibles are usually widely separated in the median line, each being
quite independent of the other; they are held in place by the tough skin in which
their median ends are imbedded. They appear to have had a free rotary move-
ment, their ventral edges swinging forward and backward; at the same time,
their median ends could be drawn together and thrown forward.

The difference in position and structure between the mandibles and _pre-
maxillz makes it improbable that one pair acted directly against the other. The
mandibles probably pushed the food forward and inward, where it could be
crushed or cut between the stout margins of the premaxille, after the manner
that prevails among the arthropods.

THE ANTIARCHA. 375

Hyoid Arches.—Back of the mandibles, the circumoral membrane is
strengthened by two bands of dermal armor. They are thin and delicately orna-
mented, and when the head isina normal position the posterior band is entirely, and
the anterior one partly, overlapped by the anterior ventral plates. The narrow
anterior band consists of five or sixsegments. The posterior one is unsegmented.
Both bands are attached to a large lateral plate, the lateral end of which is bent
at right angles, and attached to the lateral walls of the head. (Figs. 253, 254, .m.)

The mouth was a slit-like opening situated between the premaxille and in
front of the membrane uniting the two mandibles.

The oral membrane with the attached premaxille and mandibles could be
protruded a short distance, or withdrawn into the broad but shallow pre-oral
chamber.

The Eyes and Olfactory Organs.—-The oval opening on the anterior part of
the dorsal shield contains the stalked lateral eyes, the parietal eye, and the olfactory
organ. These organs were wholly or partly surrounded by small bony plates
held in place by tough but flexible membranes. (Fig. 255.)

The lateral eyes were enclosed in short, rounded eye stalks that were attached
to the margin of the parietal and olfactory plates by hinge-like joints so that the
crescent-shaped eye openings on the distal ends of the stalks could be raised or
lowered into the orbits. The exoskeleton of each eye stalk consisted of a thick
posterior dorsal, d.s., a large anterior ventral, a.s., and two ventro-lateral plates,
l.s. When the posterior dorsal plate was level with the shield, the corneal opening
was concealed within the orbits.

Parietal Eyes.—Between the lateral eyes is a thick quadrangular plate that
is nearly perforated by a deep conical pit, opening inward, and covered externally
by a thin-walled, lens-like tubercle. ‘This pit contained the anterior parietal eye.
There are two similar pits, but not so deep, on the inner surface of the small post-
orbital. There is no indication of their presence on the external surface.

Olfactory Organs.—The posterior end of the rostral plate divides into an
inner and an outer lamella, enclosing a wide triangular chamber between them.
(Fig. 251, r.) Just above the edge of the inner lamina is a small, T-shaped
ethmoid. It stands nearly vertically, with its dorsal transverse bar attached to
the anterior edge of the pineal plate. (Fig. 255, ¢.) When the anterior face of
the ethmoid is exposed, it is seen that its expanded arms, to which are attached
rod-like lateral ethmoids, /.e., and the pedicle form the lateral walls of tworounded
depressions in which the paired olfactory sacs were probably located. In the
bottom of each pit is a circular opening, leading into the interior of the head,
and serving for the passage of the olfactory nerves.

All these plates are held together and attached to the sides of the sensory
opening by tough but flexible membranes, leaving a relatively large space for
the movements of the organs. It is clear, from the various positions of the plates
in different specimens, that the parietal plate could move caudally for several
millimeters, drawing the ethmoid backward and upward, thus enlarging the open-

376 THE OSTRACODERMS.

ing to the olfactory chamber. When the outer end of the ethmoid was pushed
forward against the posterior wall of the rostral plate, two narrow passages would
still remain open, leading from the olfactory pits to the exterior. (Fig. 259, 4.)

The olfactory pits of Bothriolepis correspond to the antorbital fosse of the
aspidocephali, indicating that the union of the median and lateral eyes and the
olfactory organs into a compact median dorsal group of sense organs is very
characteristic of the ostracoderms.

Sensory Grooves.—The cutaneous sense organs were located in distinct open
grooves. (Figs. 259, A, 262.) There is a main suborbital, r./., united in front
in adults, but separate in the young; a V-shaped orbital line usually connecting
with the suborbitals in front, and at the posterior end, in immature specimens,
leading into the endolymphatic ducts; a V-shaped posterior branchial, 0.1., and a
lateral line, /.., extending backward along the sides of the branchiocephalon,
onto the sides of the trunk.

Fic. 250.—Cross-gection of Bothriolepis in the branchial region, showing the seven pairs of plate-like gills.

The cephalic appendages are large, completely armored, and consist of two
movable joints. The proximal one is covered with six plates; it is triangular in
cross-section, rounded dorsally, flat ventrally, with a sharp tuberculate anterior
margin and a thick, flat, posterior one. (Figs. 247, 248.) An opening at the
proximal end of the posterior wall and an adjacent opening in the side of the
branchiocephalon served for the passage of blood-vessels and nerves into the
interior of the appendage. (Fig. 262.) The dorsal and ventral proximal plates
formed a rounded articular head that fitted into a socket in the anterior ventro-
laterals. From the center of the socket a fixed bony rod with an expanded
head projected into the interior of the appendage, thus holding it in place after
many of the softer tissues had completely macerated. (Fig. 254, a.) This bony
rod is continuous with an axial plate, or bar, of fibrous or cartilaginous tissue
that extends into the proximal end of the appendage. The distal joint of the
appendage was movable in a horizontal plane only. It-was hollow, oval in cross-
section, with recurved marginal spines, and covered with numerous polygonal
plates.

THE ANTIARCHA. 377
Habitat. Mode of Life.

Mode of Preservation —Nodules containing the heads, or other fragments of
Bothriolepis may be found on the beach, at the foot of the gray cliffs in Miguasha,
near Dalhousie, New Brunswick; but the best specimens, showing the whole body,
can only be obtained from the unweathered strata in the cliffs.

The greater part of my material was obtained from a small “table”? about
twenty or thirty feet in diameter and sixteen to eighteen inches thick. The edge
of the table had been exposed by the wearing away of the face of the cliff, showing
two or three layers very rich in fossils. The overlying rocks were blasted out,
or worked out with pick and bar, as far as, and indeed farther than it was safe
to work into the face of the crumbling cliff. We apparently reached the inner
limits of the table. and succeeded in removing practically all the specimens con-
tained in it.

Some of the beds were crowded with fossil ferns and Bothriolepis, with here
and there a specimen of Scaumenacia, Holoptychius, and other fishes. The
animals in the richest beds were badly crushed, and the more delicate parts were
obscured by the abundant remains of plants and carbonized organic material.
In some of the other beds, where the rock was cleaner and more sandy, there
were fewer fossils, but they were not so badly crushed. In these layers there
were many specimens of Bothriolepis with the entire body distinctly preserved
in the attitude or position they were in at the moment they ceased to live.

The table was no doubt at one time the bottom of a small seashore pool, or
inlet, in which shallow-water plants were growing. It was either invaded, at
petiods of exceptionally high tides, by salt water that carried with it many fishes
and ostracoderms, or it was from time to time cut off from the main body of water
by shifting sand bars, or by similar causes. In either case, the animals trapped
in the enclosures soon died from the effects of the foul or superheated waters, and
were shortly afterward covered up and preserved by the shifting beach sands of
another invasion.

The great majority of the specimens of Bothriolepis were found in a hori-
zontal position, ventral side down, and headed in the same direction, 2.e., a little
north of east. These individuals evidently died in this position, oriented by some
common external agent.

In nearly all such cases the slender trunk and tail extend in a straight line
backward, while the thin membranous dorsal and caudal fins, which were usu-
ally perfectly flat and fully expanded, stood in a vertical direction, i.c., at right
angles to the plane of stratification. The upright position of such delicate mem-
branes shows beyond question that these particular animals died quietly while
still in their natural positions. The fact that these animals were living partly
buried in mud or sand up to the time of their death, no doubt accounts for their
wonderful state of preservation. Side by side with them were other specimens
lying either on their back or side, with the dorsal fins and tail expanded in a hori-

378 THE OSTRACODERMS.

zontal plane. They had either fallen to the bottom in this position when ex-
hausted, or turned over in the death struggle, so that the trunk and fins laid
flatwise on the upper surface of the muddy bottom. One specimen was found
standing on its head, almost vertically. It had evidently been swimming at some
speed, when taking a sudden turn, it struck the soft bottom, head first, with suff-
cient force to stick there in an upright position. This individual was not in the

Fic. 257.—Photographs of three contiguous slabs, from approximately the same level, and with the same
orientation. The slabs are seen from their under surfaces, and show the uniformity in the orientation of the numer-
ous specimens of Bothriolepis. Allare in a natural position, and are headed in the same direction, except four.
Of these, two have the ocular, or neural surface exposed (i.e., they lie, haemal side up, when the slab is in its original
position); one lies on its side; and one, u, lies with its head toward the reader; its tail is gracefully curved toward
the upper right-hand corner, apparently by a gentle current of water, that turned the tops of the enclosed water
plants in the same direction. ;

least flattened in a dorso-ventral direction, and when sectioned showed the re-
mains of the viscera settled down in the lower or anterior end of the head. In
all other cases the viscera were found lying either on the dorsal or on the ventral
wall of the branchiocephalon, according to the side that happened to be upper-
most when the animal died.

THE ANTIARCHA. 379

In the large slabs containing many ferns or plant stems, it was clearly shown
that the plants were laid down in nearly parallel lines with the tops turned in the
same direction, as though at the time they were deposited they had been bent
over by a slow current of water.

One of the larger slabs, containing ferns and Bothriolepis in great numbers,
is specially instructive. (Fig. 257.) It shows most of the fern tops turned in one
direction, with most of the Bothriolepis heads turned in nearly the opposite
one, their thin, soft bodies extending in straight lines backward. But one speci-
men, A, is lying on its back in a direction diagonal to the fern tops, thus show-
ing that when this individual died it fell on the bottom oral side up; that the
current then turned it partly around, bending its tail in a gentle curve in the
same direction as the fern tops.

In some cases several individuals of Bothriolepis were found close together,
and at different levels, but nevertheless all turned in the same direction, showing
that they were probably oriented by the same agents and died at the same time.
From these facts we may infer that they were moving along the soft bottom,
some completely covered with mud or sand, others on the surface, just as the
adult Limuli do when in great swarms they come up the sandy beaches at high
tide to lay their eggs; or as the young Limuli, when feeding, plough about
through the soft mud, from three to six inches below the surface.

Locomotion.—It is evident, therefore, that Bothriolepis was a bottom feeder,
moving about on its flat oral side, either covered by soft sand or mud, or leaving only
its projecting eyes and dorsal surface exposed. But it is evident that it was also
a free swimming form, using both its flexible tail and trunk and its large cephalic
appendages for that purpose. They probably swam, with their flat oral side up-
permost, by powerful backward strokes of their cephalic appendages, just as the
eurypterids and possibly many trilobites did in the paleozoic seas, and as many
phyllopods, entomostrica, or indeed as adult Limuli continue to do to-day.

It will be observed that the appendages are attached well forward on the
margin of the flat and narrow ventral surface; that the head is quite thick, and
the dorsal surface wide and strongly arched. A body shaped like this would
naturally move through the water like a boat right side up. It is evident that
Bothriolepis could not be driven through the water, dorsal side up, without a
strong tendency to pitch downward head first, or to roll over. As the cephalic
appendages were very narrow and had little dorso-ventral movement, they could
hardly succeed in counteracting, or preventing, that tendency. Hence it is clear
that the animal had to swim with its dorsal side down, and with its center of
gravity below the level of the supporting appendages. In this position equilib-
rium could easily be maintained either by the arms or by the tail, and the curved
anterior surface of the head, according to the rate of its forward movement, would
greatly aid in uplifting the cumbersome head in the water.

Food.—Well preserved specimens always contain, in addition to the rem-
nants of other soft parts, a thick oval disc of carbonaceous material, that undoubt-

380 THE OSTRACODERMS.

edly represents the contents of the stomach. A microscopic examination failed
to reveal any definite structures in it, such as diatomes or fragments of bones or
shells. It has the same appearance as the remnants of plants seen outside the
body, and like them readily burns when heated, leaving a whitish ash. We may
therefore infer that Bothriolepis fed on the ferns or other water plants that were
so abundant in the places where they have been found. Such a diet was appa-
rently better suited to the peculiar structure of their jaws than any other.

We therefore again come to the same conclusion that was reached in another
way, namely that there is a close resemblance between the ostracoderms and
the amphibia, for Bothriolepis, with its big head and small tail, its vegetable diet,
the peculiar action of its lower jaws while feeding, and in its general mode of life,
greatly resembles the tadpole larva of the common frog. The most striking
difference between them is the apparent absence in the tadpole of the large
cephalic appendages, but these organs are probably represented by the sucking
discs, which in turn are comparable with the “balancers”” of Amblystoma and
other urodeles (Fig. 169), and with the long filamentous cephalic appendages
of Dactylethra or Zenopus. (Fig. 170.)

CHAPTER XXI.

THE VERTEBRATES.

We are now in a position to see more clearly the relation that the true verte-
brates bear to the ostracoderms. The full recognition of the ostracoderms as
the common ancestors of all vertebrates will prove to be a fruitful idea and will
go far toward laying at rest the obscession of the last thirty years or more, that the
foundations of vertebrate morphology rest on Amphioxus and the elasmobranchs;
that in them is the beginning and the end, beyond which lies a fathomless abyss.

It will be a great step forward if it can be demonstrated beyond a reasonable
doubt, as I believe it can be demonstrated, that the heavily armored ostracoderms,
with cephalic appendages and a large atrial or peribranchial chamber, form the
starting point for all animals entitled to be called vertebrates; not the dermal-
denticled shark, nor the naked-skinned cyclostomes, nor the impotent remnants of
animals that constitute the acraniates.

If we attempt precisely to define the natural limits of the ostracoderms
and their immediate descendants, we at once meet with great difficulties and
after all we must for the present resort to arbitrary definitions. It is doubtful,
for example, whether we should, or should not, exclude the ccelolepide and the
anaspide from the ostracoderms, or whether we should, or should not, include
with them the arthrodira, or even the antiarcha. The dipnoi might be excluded
from the “fishes” on the ground that they are really primitive amphibians. If
so, we should then have remaining, as representative fishes, the elasmobranchii,
holocephali, teleostomi and cyclostomes, forms very unlike in structure and origin.
However, while recognizing the inadequacy of the current terminology, we shall
nevertheless adopt it, as indicated in the tabular scheme of relationships, without
attempting to build up a new one that might express more clearly the views herein
set forth.

The ostracoderms may be briefly characterized as follows: They consist
of a comparatively small number of metameres, and are provided with a highly
developed dermal armor, cephalic locomotor appendages, paired jaws, a large
atrial or peribranchial, chamber, and with eyes and olfactory organs located
near the middle of the aboral surface of the forehead. The form and general
appearance suggest that of a trilobite or merostome, or an amphibian tadpole,
rather than that of a true fish. Their negative characters, compared with those
of the vertebrates, consist in the presence of a diminutive notochord, without
definite constrictions or thickenings of the sheath to form centra, and without
recognizable neural or hemal arches, pectoral or pelvic appendages, or teeth.

It is a remarkable fact that the descendants of the ostracoderms, in their

381

382 THE VERTEBRATES.

several respective phyla, have independently acquired the same kind of organs,
or they pass through similar phases of development. Jn other words, there appear
to be present in the ostracoderms certain latent conditions that produce, sooner
or later, the same results in their various descendants, long after the stock is

Ju.

pe

Per.

Carb.

Devonian

Silurian

——

Avachnids.

Fic. 258.—Diagram to illustrate the probable phylogeny of the arachnid, ostracoderm, vertebrate stock.

broken up into separate phyla.

derms the dermal skeleton tends to break up into smaller plates which ultimately
disappear, leaving the skin naked. In the cyclostomes and in Amphioxus, the
dermal skeleton probably disappeared at a very early period in their history. The
same thing took place, but at a later period, in the holocephali; still later in the
elasmobranchs, teleostomi, and amphibia. Teeth, pectoral and pelvic fins, neural

For example, in all descendants of the ostraco- ~

THE CYCLOSTOMATA. 383

and hemal arches, and vertebral centra are not recognizable in the ostracoderms,
yet they make their appearance in the elasmobranchs, holocephali and teleostomi,
in each case apparently arising independently of the other. There is also a well-
marked tendency in all these three groups, or in their more remote descendants,
for the lateral eyes, olfactory, and auditory organs, to become greatly enlarged;
for the eyes and olfactory organs to take up a more lateral position; for the paired
jaws to unite; the trunk and caudal segments to increase in number; the viscera
and anus to take up a more caudal position, and for the dental plates and branchial
chamber to disappear.

At some time, probably not later than the Silurian period, at least three or four
well defined phyla grew out of the ostracoderms, as indicated in the accompanying
table. (Fig. 258.) The main line of ascent probably leads from the typical
ostracoderms, through the antiarcha and arthrodires, to the crossopterygians,
dipnoi and amphibia. Evolution along this line is steady, comparatively rapid,
and in every respect leads consistently upward to the first air-breathing land
vertebrates, the culminating metamorphosis depending on remote antecedent
changes in the dermal skeleton, appendages, air bladder, and heart.

The remaining phyla stand quite apart from this main stem. ‘They are
characterized by the breaking up of the dermal armor into minute plates (elasmo-
branchs) or by their absence altogether (the later holocephali); by the absence
of an air bladder, branchial chamber, and leg-like fins. At no time in their
history, so far as it is known, do they show any indications whatever of develop-
ing into air-breathing vertebrates. They do not possess the necessary anatomical
structures, and their evolution takes them into quite other directions. The
cyclostomes end in lampreys; the holocephali in chimeras, and the elasmobranchs
in sharks and rays. We may characterize the several phyla arising from the
ostracoderms as follows: ,

I. CYCLOSTOMATA.

The cyclostomes may be regarded as one of the earliest off-shoots of the ostra-
coderms. We may consider their chief characteristics under three heads, namely
those derived from the ostracoderms, those gained, and those lost since their
separation from them.

1. The cyclostomes retain the following organs derived from the ostraco-
derms: A median, practically unpaired, olfactory organ, merged with a persistent
hypophysis that opens on the dorsal surface of the head. An uncommonly large
and well developed parietal eye. The lateral eyes, on the contrary, are relatively
small, and are very late in acquiring a functional union with the superficial ecto-
derm. Hence, except for the insignificant visual power possessed by the parietal
eye, there is a long post-embryonic blind period corresponding to the permanent
blind period in some of the earlier ostracoderms. It is explained on the assump-
tion that the lateral eyes, during the ostracoderm stage in the phylogeny of the

384 THE VERTEBRATES.

vertebrates, had for the first time been forced into the brain chamber by the in-
folding of the medullary plate, and had not completely regained their functional
relations with the outside world.

There are, in the adults of some genera, three pairs of oral arches provided
with rudimentary appendages. The arches are comparable with the three
pairs in amphibian embryos, i.e., premaxille, maxilla, and mandibles, and with
the three dental-plate arches of adult ostracoderms and arthrodires. (Fig. 175.)
The true mouth is not always circular, but may be a narrow, longitudinal slit.
The oral region may be surrounded by a wide papillate fold of ectoderm that
forms a shallow, circumoral antechamber, or pre-oral hood, comparable with
the membranous folds on the free anterior edges of the dorsal and ventral shields
of Bothriolepis.

The thyroid gland, which represents a liver-like diverticulum comparable
with that on the hemal surface of the thoracic gut in arachnids (Figs. 43, 44,
r81, 182, 308), is very large, reaching here its maximum development in primi-
tive vertebrates. The peribranchial chamber may be in part retained.

2. The cyclostomes have lost, probably at a very early period, their an-
cestral dermal armor, including the jaw plates; also the cephalic swimming
appendages and lateral folds; and the tadpole-like form does not appear in any
phase of their development.

3. The cyclostomes have failed to develop many important organs that have
appeared in the other descendants of the ostracoderms. There are no paired
pectoral or pelvic appendages; the notochord persists in a practically unmodified
condition; no traces of ring-like calcifications of its sheath appear, and only the
most diminutive neural and hemal spines are developed. The air bladder
and teeth of the vertebrate type are absent.

The actual progress made by the cyclostomes since their separation from
the ostracoderms is therefore insignificant, the only noteworthy gain being in the
increased number of body segments, giving additional freedom and facility of
locomotion, and an imperfect adaptation to a parasitic mode of life. The cyclos-
tomes may therefore be regarded as very ancient animals, deriving their underlying
primitive characters from the ostracoderms, and owing the present simplicity of
their organization to a precocious senility that was never preceded by a vigorous,
creative youth.

I. THe ELASMOBRANCHII AND HOLOCEPHALI.

The Elasmobranchii.—The advent of the elasmobranchs is clearly fore-
shadowed in the Silurian period by the appearance of the ccelolepide with their
fish-like form and shagreen-like armor. The successive steps in the fragmentation
and final disappearance of the dermal armor are well shown in this branch of the
ostracoderms. The process begins in the cephalaspide with the formation of well-
marked, but immovable polygonal areas, followed by the appearance of the
small free plates of Ateleaspis and Lasanius, and by the isolated dermal denticles
of Thelodus and the elasmobranchs, which finally disappear altogether in their

THE ELASMOBRANCHII AND HOLOCEPHALI. 385

naked-skinned, modern representatives. The primitive elasmobranchs quickly
acquired a fish-like form, losing the extensive ancestral peribranchial chamber,
and at no phase of their development showing, so far as known, any trace of
a tadpole stage.

The notochord, at an early period, is invested and largely replaced by well-
developed cartilaginous centra, and an elaborate system of more or less calcified
cartilaginous gill bars, and neural and hemal arches is developed.

The lateral fold is generally retained for a longer or shorter period, giving
rise by local enlargement to well defined pectoral and pelvic fins. The parietal
eye is not conspicuously developed; neither are the three pairs of embryonic
oral arches, nor the corresponding appendages. True teeth appear on the upper
and lower margins of the mouth, but they are not preceded by any recognizable
dental plates. An air bladder is absent.

The ova are very large, fertilized within the body, and the males are provided
with highly specialized intromittent organs or claspers.

The elasmobranchs, owing largely to their well developed sensory and loco-
motor organs, and to their formidable jaws and teeth, developed rapidly in efficiency
during the late paleozoic period, but they pass the climax of their evolution
without producing a noticeably higher type of organization. While the internal]
skeleton may be highly developed and more or less calcified, it never develops
into true bone.

The elasmobranchs are pelagic or deep water fishes rather than frequenters
of the shallow brackish waters of the shore.

The absence of an air-bladder excluded the possibility of their becoming
air breathers, and the pectoral and pelvic fins show no signs of developing into
elongated, digitate appendages suitable for locomotion on land.

The Holocephali probably arose from the ccelolepid branch of the ostraco-
derms, developing along somewhat similar lines as the elasmobranchs, but
retaining certain features of the parent stock not seen in the latter. The noto-
chord is persistent, but enveloped by ring-like calcifications of its sheath more
numerous than the cartilagenous neural and hemal arches. They retain the
large head and small trunk, or tadpole form, of the ostracoderms; a peribranchial
chamber, and a short body cavity, with the viscera and anus placed well forward.
Three pairs of dental plates are present, consisting of vascular dentine and grow-
ing from persistent pulps. They probably represent the premaxillary, maxillary,
and mandibular plates of the ostracoderms and arthrodires, and belong to the
three pairs of primitive oral arches seen in amphibian embryos. The general
shape of the mouth and the form of the jaws resemble those of the ostracoderms
and amphibian tadpoles rather than those of an elasmobranch. No true verte-
brate teeth are developed.

The primitive characters above mentioned are those of the ostracoderms
and are sufficient to distinguish the chimeras from all other adult vertebrates.
But the cartilaginous internal skeleton, the large-sized ova, the internal fertiliza-

25

386 THE VERTEBRATES

tion, the anal claspers of the males, and the absence of an air bladder, indicate
an affinity, although probably a remote one, with the elasmobranchs.

Ill. THe ARTHRODIRA, TELEOSTOMII, DrpNor, AND AMPHIBIA.

The antiarcha, at some time probably not later than the early Devonian. gave
rise to the arthrodira. From the latter sprang the teleostomii and dipnoi, and

Fic. 259. Fic. 260. Fic. 261.

Fics. 259, 260, 261.—Figures illustrating three important stages in the evolution of the head and oral arches of
vertebrates, as shown by an ostracoderm (Bothriolepis), an arthrodire (Coccosteus) and a primitive dipnoan
(Scaumenacia). The important steps are: (1) the union of the three pairs of oral arches to form an unpaired upper
and lower jaw, with denticulate jaw plates; (2) the separation of the olfactory organs and lateral eyes, and their
migration to their typical position in vertebrates; (3) the breaking up, the reduction, and the more intimate union
with the head, of the dermal armor to the visceral and respiratory organs, and their transformation into the oper-
cular plates that cover only the respiratory organs.

C and D are semi-diagrammatic restorations, based on the descriptions of Dean, Traquair, Hussakof, and
Jaeckel; E and F are restorations of Scaumenacia curta (Whiteaves), made from a large number of well preserved
specimens in the author’s collection. In F, the mandibular plate, d, is removed on the left, exposing the under
surface of the large dental plate of the lower jaw, and the pre-maxillary and maxillary plates of the upper jaw.

from them, near the beginning of the carboniferous, the first air-breathing verte-
brates, or amphibians from which, at some subsequent period, all the highers
vertebrates had their origin, directly or indirectly. (Fig. 309.)

These animals, the most vigorous and varied offspring of the ostracoderms,

THE ARTHRODIRA, TELEOSTOMII, DIPNOI, AND AMPHIBIA. 387

form a homogeneous stock that stands distinctly apart from all other primitive
vertebrates. In practically all of them the ancestral dermal armor has a pro-
longed and flourishing existence, and is rarely, or never, entirely suppressed. In
the more primitive groups it survives in the form of large superficial plates
ornamented with low rounded tubercles, or with sinuous, beaded ridges. On
the trunk and tail they are usually smaller, forming irregular, polygonal, or
rounded scales which tend to sink deeper into the skin and eventually to dis-
appear, leaving even in such primitive forms as Bothriolepis and some coccosteans a
practically naked skin behind. But in the adults of all branches of the phylum
a considerable number of the ancient, large-sized cranial plates are retained in
the head region, forming a characteristic covering for the roof and sides of the
head, jaws, gill chamber, and pectoral arches. With this prolonged survival
of the primitive dermal armor, there is an early and vigorous development of an
endoskeleton, consisting of true bone, which here makes its appearance for the
first time in the history of the animal kingdom.

A bony floor and sides to the endocranium are formed, as well as complete
bony vertebre consisting of centra intimately united with neural and hemal
arches and transverse processes.

A large peribranchial chamber is always present, but the rigid, armored walls
of this chamber, so characteristic of the ostracoderms, are greatly shortened in the
arthrodires, and in the teleostomes, dipnoi, and amphibia, give place to membran-
ous folds that may or may not be strengthened by movable opercular plates.

Three pairs of oral arches are usually conspicuous in the embryonic stages,
and the branchial arches may retain remnants of arachnid appendages, in the form
of external gills, hyoidian “balancers,” oral arch papille, tentacles, or adhesive
discs.

The parietal eye is generally well-developed, and so far as known, a large,
lung-like air bladder occurs in all the main subdivisions of the phylum. The
primitive pectoral and pelvic appendages may be narrow and elongated, with
a bony internal skeleton that in the earliest fish-like descendants of the arthrodires
shows, for the first time in the evolution of the vertebrates, distinct traces of the
radiate terminal digits, and the jointed axis characteristic of all primitive land
vertebrates (Eusthanopteron. Fig. 265.)

The ova are of moderate size, frequently covered with an adhesive, gelatin-
ous substance, and are generally fertilized externally. The antiarcha, coccoste-
ans, dipnoi, and primitive teleostomes were preeminently shallow water, shore-
loving forms, as are their survivors to-day. Their highly developed air bladder,
leg-like fins, specialized breeding habits, and the general structure and mode of
life characteristic of the higher members of this phyla, afford an easy anatomical
and physiological transition to the amphibia, and hence to the higher air-breathing
land vertebrates. =
_ On the other hand, the young of many amphibia, dipnoi and, teleostomes pass
through a larval, or tadpole, stage generally characterized by a large head, by the

388 THE VERTEBRATES.

presence of rudimentary appendages on the oral and branchial arches, by a small
mouth with a feeble lower jaw, short body cavity and slender tail, and by the
absence of postbranchial paired appendages. This tadpole larva is clearly the
recurrence of the ostracoderm stage in their phylogeny. (Fig. 167.)

The Arthrodira.—The arthrodires closely resemble the ostracoderms in the
structure of their jaws and in the arrangement of their cranial plates, and without
doubt are directly descended from them. While it is not possible to identify
in detail all the various structures involved in the general resemblance that runs
through them all, we can trace a progressive series of structures and events that
lead steadily upward from the ostracoderms, through the arthrodires, to the
vertebrates.

Without entering into a detailed discussion of the arthrodires, an examination
of Coccosteus, a fairly well-known and typical representative, will show us the
more important respects in which they approach the vertebrates.

In Coccosteus (Figs. 260, 263), the central aggregate of procephalic sense
organs seen in the ostracoderms has separated. The lateral eyes have increased
greatly in size and have taken up an antero-lateral position, losing apparently
some of their dermal armor and their power to rise and fall in the orbits; the
parietal eye is lodged in a small median plate, located in about the same posi-
tion as before, while the olfactory organs have moved forward and laterally,
occupying a more nearly terminal position.

Jaws.—Three pairs of jaws are present. The premaxille are relatively
smaller than in the ostracoderms, and although still distinctly paired, are less freely
movable in a transverse direction. The rudiments of toothed maxillz are present,
for the first time, as small free plates that probably represent the small ventro-
lateral plate of Bothriolepis. The mandibles have increased greatly in size and
may be provided with prominent tooth-like spikes on their anterior and median
borders, being in this respect more like arthropod jaws than those of Bothriolepis,
the only ostracoderm whose mandibles are known. Like the ostracoderm man-
dibles, they were capable of very complex movements. Both ends were free;
that is, they were not firmly articulated to any cartilage or bone, and could be
either rotated, or moved in a transverse and longitudinal direction. Their ex-
posed median ends were probably held in place by the integument, while their
lateral ends were buried in the tissues of the head, and served for the attachment
of the sinews and powerful muscles that controlled their movements.

A, single hyoid arch (Fig. 260, 2), covered with dermal bone, extended
across the throat behind the mandibles, in place of the two arches of similar
structure seen in Bothriolepis.

The cranial bones are more numerous than in the antiarcha, owing probably
to the breaking up of the large orbital plate by the lateral migration of the eyes.
The same movement has probably opened the way for the formation, for the
first time, of a supra-orbital line of cutaneous sense organs.

The branchial shield retains nearly the same number and arrangement of

THE ARTHRODIRA. 389

plates as in the ostracoderms, but it is greatly reduced in size, and deeply incised
on the flanks, thus opening up the peribranchial chamber. It thereby takes on
more distinctly the character of a true operculum, and apparently serves solely
for the protection of the gills and heart, the digestive and urogenital organs

Fic. 262, 263, 264.—Side views of the heads of: A, Bothriolepis; B, Coccosteus; and C, Scaumenacia curta,
Whiteaves. In the latter, the outer part of the left mandible has been omitted, exposing the large mandibular
dental plate and the row of minute teeth on the anterior margin of the mandibles.

taking up a position farther back, wholly posterior to the respiratory region, as
indicated by the large size of the postbranchial section of the trunk, and by the
probable location of the cloacal opening.

In probably all arthrodires, the notochord persisted throughout life with little
or no change. Although there are no indications of vertebral centra, we see for

390 THE VERTEBRATES.

the first time a well-developed series of neural and hemal arches, the forerunners
of a true vertebral column.

The cephalic appendages, a, that were so characteristic of the ostracoderms,
are here rudimentary and probably functionless. With the relative decrease in
the size of the head and the increase in the size of the trunk, the whole body is
better balanced and more suitable for an active, free swimming existence. Loco-
motion was probably effected largely by the flexible trunk and tail, although im-
mediately behind the branchial region there are traces of supports for small
pectoral fins, the first appearance in this phylum of paired appendages of the
vertebrate type. Pelvic fins were apparently absent.

The arthrodires clearly represent a higher type of animals than the ostraco-
derms. They have successfully emerged from the precarious period of profound
metamorphosis in which the ostracoderms were engaged. While it lasted, an
active life was inhibited by the changes going on in the old organs, and by the
imperfect adjustment of the new.

With the arthrodires that period is past. They have increased notably in
size; the eyes are fully adjusted to their new location within the neural tube; the
mouth has become capacious, and the jaws large and powerful, with formidable
cutting, or toothed margins, well suited for capturing and devouring animal food;
the respiratory region is set apart from the digestive and urogenital regions, and
the body is better balanced and better adapted for an active, free swimming life.
The arthrodires, therefore, quickly developed from the sluggish, plant-eating
stage of the ostracoderms, into the most active, rapacious, and formidable animals
of their time. But as a class they were short-lived, for the structural conditions
within had as yet attained only a temporary equilibrium, and the new mode of
life was rapidly producing new creative forces. Out of these conditions arose
the first true vertebrates of this phylum, the dipnoi and the teleostomes.

The anatomical changes involved in the creation of the new types of animals
were comparatively insignificant. The head became relatively smaller and more
compact, the trunk larger, and the whole body assumed a more fish-like appear-
ance. (Figs. 261-264.) The lateral eyes grew still larger and took up a position
on the sides of the head, well behind the olfactory pits, which have also greatly
increased in size. The premaxille fused, forming the fronto-nasal process, and
together with the maxilla became permanently fixed to the floor of the cranium.
The distal ends of the mandibles united in the median line, and their proximal
ends articulated with a cranial cartilage, to which the hyoid arch was also at-
tached; they then lose their rotary and transverse movements, and swing forward
and backward against the maxillary arch in typical vertebrate fashion.

With the fusion in the median line of the three pairs of oral arches, their
dermal armor becomes the three pairs of fixed dental plates characteristic of the
dipnoi (Fig. 261, p.mx,mx.d.p.), and from which the isolated socketed teeth of
the higher vertebrates arose.

The plates in the dorso-lateral walls of the primitive branchial shield now

THE ARTHRODIRA. = 391

form movable opercula, and those in the ventral wall become attached to the
mandibular and hyoid arches to form the gular plates.

The dermal plates on the dorsal surface of the head (mesocephalon) increase
in number, and approach the typical arrangement seen in the primitive air-breath-
ing vertebrates. The base of the endocranium becomes ossified; bony centra
appear in the sheath of the notochord and, uniting with the neural and hemal
arches, form true vertebre.

A B

Fic. 265.—Photograph of the left pectoral appendage of Eusthanopteron fordi (Whiteaves). The skeleton of
the basal portion of the appendage was exposed; that of the terminal portion was apparently covered by skin
which has shrunken sufficiently to show the arrangement of the internal skeleton. The skeleton of this appendage
resembles that of the land vertebrates, and indicates the way, as shown in B, in which the typical skeleton of
the pectoral appendage of the tetrapoda has been derived from the biserial pectoral fin of fishes. (From specimen
in the authors collection from Scaumenac Bay. P. Q., Canada.)

The pectoral fins enlarge and the girdle extends dorsally, uniting with the
occipital portion of the cranium.

Within the pectoral fins, for the first time in the phylogeny of the vertebrates,
appears an axial skeleton that approaches, in the arrangement of its elements,
the characteristic structure of the appendages of the land vertebrates, i.¢., Eus-
thenopteron. (Fig. 265.) Pelvic fins appear in the anal region.

* * Ea * * * * * *

Thus the broad foundations for the evolution of the first air-breathing land
vertebrates is laid in the dipnoi and ganoids, the armored fishes of the upper

392 THE VERTEBRATES.

Devonian; reaching down through them to the arthrodires and to the ostracoderms
of the Silurian, and then again beyond them to the merostomes, trilobites, and
primitive phyllopods of the Ordovician, Cambrian, and Proterozoic.

In this vigorous phylum, evolution follows a logical and consistent course,
each important event being the direct, or indirect result of the preceding ones,
and they themselves creating the conditions that bring about those that follow.
The various independent sets of organs, such as the brain, sense organs, appen-
dages, jaws, internal and external skeleton, in their own peculiar ways move steadily
onward toward the same end, in a manner that could hardly be possible except
in a real, not an imaginary, line of evolution. The perfection with which these
immensely varied and complicated facts and details fit together to form a definite,
intelligible picture, carries with it the overwhelming conviction that that picture

is an image of the truth. The precision with which each event creates again and:

yet again, new conditions, new organs, and new readjustments, shows that the
primary forces that sustain and direct the main lines of evolution are self-creative,
and lie within, not without, the organism.

i
i
}

PART II. THE ACRANIATA.

CHAPTER XXII.

THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

The Statement of the Problem.—One of the chief difficulties in the study
of the origin of vertebrates is to correctly estimate the value of contradictory
evidence and to assign due weight to opinions based on a particular point of
view, or on a particular source of information. Thus Amphioxus, Balanoglossus,
Cephalodiscus, the tunicates, echinoderms, and annelids have been variously
exploited as the ancestral stock from which the vertebrates arose, and each view
has had its followers that from time to time have openly confessed their faith and
duly readjusted their estimates of morphological values.

From the very outset the analysis of the vertebrate head and trunk by means
of comparative anatomy and embryology seemed to demonstrate that the ances-
tral vertebrate was an elongated animal composed of many like metameres, each
one consisting of sharply defined members of the more important system of organs,
z.e., nephridia, neuromeres, myotomes, sense organs, gut pouches, and gill clefts,
thus suggesting the condition so clearly presented by many annelids. For many
years, therefore, Amphioxus was regarded as the most primitive existing verte-
brate, because its simple structure and the sharply defined segmentation of its
mesoderm, gill clefts, and other organs, appeared to represent the actual em-
bodiment of the ideal vertebrate. But the organs that are the first to show a
metameric arrangement in the invertebrates, and the ones to maintain it most
persistently, such as the appendages, sense organs, and nerve cords, were in
Amphioxus either absent or without any indication of segmentation.

The fact that in typically segmented invertebrates, such as the arthropods
and annelids, the nerve cord nearly always consists of sharply defined and widely
separated ganglia, or neuromeres, while in Amphioxus little or no indication
of such a condition is visible, occasioned little comment, while much was
made of the segmental arrangement of the myotomes, gill clefts, and later of the
nephridia.

When it was shown that the development of the tunicates was very similar
to that of Amphioxus, and that the tunicate larva had a well defined notochord,
which later disappeared during a process of degenerative metamorphosis, the
problem was greatly complicated, for the tunicates clearly belonged to a lower
type structurally than Amphioxus, yet they were farther removed from the hypo-
thetical, ideally segmented ancestor of the vertebrates than either Amphioxus or
any of the true fishes.

393

394 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

The clue was apparently leading in the wrong direction, into the darkness
rather than into the light, and the problem was by no means simplified when it
appeared, more and more clearly, that Balanoglossus resembled Amphioxus and
the tunicates in certain important particulars, especially in the structure and
development of the ccelom and gill clefts, while its larva resembled that of the
echinoderms.

Again the problem was still further complicated by the discovery of Cephalo-
discus and Rhabdopleura, at first supposed to be related to the polyzoa, and con-
sequently suspiciously close to the brachiopods, but later very generally recog-
nized as also related to Balanoglossus, and hence in some way involved with the
tunicates and amphioxus, which outwardly they did not in the least resemble.
An amphioxus-balanoglossus-like animal with six pairs of legs, such as those
of Cephalodiscus, was perforce accepted without a grimace, although it was not
very readily assimilated.

The trail was leading well down toward the roots of the animal kingdom,
but certainly not toward anything like a worm-like ancestral form composed of
many well defined, similar metameres. The evidence that was accumulating,
while in some cases more concrete than that produced in the earlier history of the
problem, became less convincing. It led in too many directions, and was forcing
morphologists at large to accept conclusions against which their better judgment
rebelled, but from which there was apparently no escape. While many preferred
to doubt the evidence rather than accept the conclusions, or even began to lose
faith in the efficacy of comparative embryology as a means of solving large problems
in phylogeny, others, with commendable loyalty, adhered to the particular faith
in which they had been educated, and advocated it with sufficient ardor, at least
until the next hypothesis appeared. But as the number of attractive theories
increased, the older morphologists apparently concluded that it was wiser to
accept neither one nor the other, and to beware of them all. It was perhaps
realized that one might live very happily wedded to one view, if it was not for
the others; for it was increasingly evident that embracing any one theory created
more difficulties than were overcome, since each rejected one was then sure to
look more formidable than ever.

However, our new hypothesis is not open to these objections, for in accepting
the arachnid theory we shall have the privilege of adopting into our household,
as her children, many of the other attractive theories that have from time to time
won our affection. ‘The arachnid theory opens the way to a reconciliation of the
conflicting views above indicated. It offers a solution that is logical, consistent
with the facts, so far as we know them, and in harmony with the basic principles
of morphology.

In brief, we recognize two great groups of animals that have independently
acquired some of those characters commonly associated with the chordata.
Both groups are descended exclusively from primitive arthropod stock, that is, from
small bodied animals of a small number of ill defined metameres (resembling a

THE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM. 395

nauplius or an ostracode) and which in turn were derived from rotifer-like trocho-
zoans. Neither the annelids nor any other worm-like forms were included in this
stock. (Fig. 309.) The first group, the syncephalata, includes together with
other arthropods, the phyllopod-arachnid-ostracoderm-vertebrate phylum, or
the craniata; the second group, or the acraniata, includes the cirripeds, tunicates,
Amphioxus, echinoderms, enteropneusta, pterobranchia, phoronida, polyzoa,
chetognatha, and brachiopods.

Our problem is in a measure clarified, and at once assumes an entirely new
aspect, as soon as we recognize that the chordata consist of several phyla derived
from the arthropods via as many separate lines, and that some of the striking
features in which they resemble one another were independently acquired. We
associate, for example, Amphioxus, Balanoglossus, and the tunicates with the
vertebrates because of their notochord, perforated gill slits, hemostoma, and
atrial chamber. But, as we have already seen, these basic characters, in one
form or another, are actually, or potentially present in all primitive arthropods,
and presumably, they may be expressed in all their descendants, although, per-
haps at different times, and in varying ways, in different phyla.

The assumption that several independent caudate phyla have arisen from
the arthropods is of two-fold value, for it enables us to explain why the tunicate-
balanoglossus group resembles at the same time both the arthropods and the
vertebrates, without being in the direct line of vertebrate descent; and it enables
us to attach these heretofore isolated and obscure phyla to the great trunk line
of organic evolution, and to thereby obtain a new basis for the interpretation of
their morphology.

Let us first consider in a summary way the more important features of these
two great groups.

The Craniates.

We have shown in the preceding chapters that the trunk line of vertebrate
descent runs through the dipnoi-arthrodire-ostracoderm-arachnid-phyllopod
stock, which almost from the very outset consisted of highly specialized segmented
animals. Primarily they were neither sessile nor parasitic, but large, vigorous
free swimming forms with highly developed nervous system, sense organs, cephalic
appendages, and paired jaws. They were often, at times predominantly, fre-
quenters of the warm littoral, of fresh or brackish waters, and of the land. At
every stage of evolution, with a few notable exceptions, the animals that consti-
tuted the advancing crest of this stock have been on the whole the largest, and
the most active, the greatest consumers and spenders of energy, the most highly
organized, the most progressive and innovating, and the most widely distributed
animals of their day and generation.

They had a chitenous, dentine-like exoskeleton, a cartilaginous endocranium,
gill cartilages, middle chord, gill sacs, voluminous enteric diverticula, a trioc-

396 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

cellate parietal eye, frontal, or olfactory sense organs, and compacted cephalic
neuromeres. The vast majority of them were free moving forms during their
early post embryonic, and adult stages. Their highly specialized appendages,
well developed sense organs, and neuro-muscular systems enable them to execute
varied movements with great precision in response to exceedingly complex sur-
roundings; they were the first animals to acquire an effective response to stimuli
of distant origin, to perceive the intangible, to pursue, and to capture. Their
eggs contained a large quantity of yolk, and the embryos did not leave the egg
till they had attained an advanced stage of development.

In this phylum the theme was metamerism. Progress was first attained by
perfecting metamerism, later by its suppression or elimination. The larger
possibilities of this type of structure were practically exhausted in the arthropods,
and it had already entered another phase before the critical period arrived that
was to give rise to the vertebrates. During the early history of the phylum, pro-
gressive evolution was effected by a gradual increase in the number of metameres,
and by gradually increasing the perfection, or the fullness and precision with
which metamerism was expressed. Metamerism then began to decline, owing
to the local exaggeration, suppression, and fusion of organs. This process was
most strongly marked at the anterior, or older end of the lengthening series of
metameres, thus leading to the formation of an extensive and extremely complex
head region, to a new linear arrangement of unlike organs and functions, and to
the production of a higher and more unified type of organization than has been
attained in any other phylum of the animal kingdom.

The formation of new metameres at the caudal end, and the specialization
of the older ones at the cephalic end, on the whole proceeded simultaneously,
so that at no stage in the evolution of the phylum did the body consist of a
long series of like metameres. Only a few metameres, if any, ever approached
a condition of ideal perfection, that is, one containing all the so-called segmental
organs. Serial homology in the craniate phylum is, therefore, necessarily im-
perfect, and the organs at one end of a series are never fully comparable with
those at the other.

Il. Tor ACRANIATA.

The second great group of animals with arthropod affinities constitutes
the acraniata. It may be called the cirriped division of the arthropod stock,
for the cirripeds appear to form its central figure, and because many of the more
striking features of the various sub-phyla are most clearly expressed in the cirri-
peds. We include in the acraniata, the cirripeds, tunicates, Amphioxus, echino-
derms, enteropneusta, chetognotha, pterobranchia, phoronida, polyzoa, and
brachiopoda, all of which, with the exception of the polyzoa, are exclusively marine.
They are all derived from cirriped-like forms, or with them, from ostracoda, or
small nauplius-like arthropods that consisted of a small number of imperfectly
developed metameres. They form more or less independent subphyla, in no

THE ACRANIATES. 307

way directly united with the vertebrate stock, and in no sense to be regarded as
the ancestors of the vertebrates.

From every point of view, and from every point of departure, the evidence
leads more and more decisively to this conclusion. The vertebrates, however

ae .Fore-brpin. abs
ev eg .
~Buddin 9:

evhneeercice _-MontlerVestib. ;
Lichen . Free.
y Of cerns cencense FUREM
LO/....---- wea ssesee.--Cephal stalk.)

Fic. 266.—Diagram to illustrate the probable interrelations of the acraniata, and their origin from a small
nauplius-like arthropod ancestor. The characteristic shape of each division and its normal orientation to its
point of attachment is indicated. The neural surface may be identified by the brain and nerve cord, in black. The
principal characters of each division are indicated by the presence of a + or o sign opposite the descriptive term
on the right. When a character may be either present or absent, or doubtful, the plus sign is enclosed in a circle.
The more specialized characters stand, as far as practical in such a diagram, at the top of the list.

far back we may go, do not lead to the acraniates, and the acraniates do not
take us back to the same stock as that from which the vertebrates arose. Indeed
all the acraniates are chiefly notable for the absence of those very structures
and modes of growth so characteristic of the craniates. In the acraniates a differ-
ent set of organs are emphasized, and the general direction of evolution is different.

398 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

In every subphylum metamerism is suppressed, the structure simplified, and
evolution has of necessity led toward a less active, less complicated mode of life;
in fact, farther and farther away from the characteristic condition in the craniate
stock, rather than nearer to it.

* * * * * * * * *

The chief characteristics common to the exceedingly heterogeneous group
of sub-phyla constituting the acraniates may be defined as follows:

Metamerism.—The metameres are few in number, except in Amphioxus,
and are rarely if ever sharply, or fully defined. Even when the metamerism is
fairly well expressed in the younger stages, it degenerates or becomes greatly
obscured, or it may disappear altogether in the adult (cirripeds, tunicates).
Whether this is a true degeneration, or merely a special form of development,
is a matter of definition. It is certain, however, that the possibilities of the meta-
meric type of structure, so fully realized in the arachnid division, are never real-
ized here.

There is no organic union of specialized metameres to form a compound
head, although in the cirripeds we may recognize one or two pairs of temporary
antenne, three pairs of jaws, and five or six pairs of abdominal appendages,
indicating the division of the body into tagmas, corresponding approximately
to the procephalon, mesocephalon or thorax, and metacephalon or branchial
region of the arachnids. (Fig. 275.) In the cirripeds, the primitive head and
thorax are the first to lose their metameric structure, the only indication of it
left in the adult being the jaws, and even these may disappear.

The main divisions of the body, but with little or no indication of their further
subdivision into metameres, are recognizable in the other sub-phyla as the pro-
boscis, the collar, and branchial regions (Amphioxus, enteropneusta, ptero-
branchia); or they are probably represented merely by the principal subdivisions
of the ccelom seen in the ectoprocta, phoronida, chetognatha, and echinodermata.

The appendages are always simple in structure, stub-like, tentacular, or
altogether absent. Their serial identity is only vaguely indicated, but we may
recognize the rudiments of procephalic appendages, probably corresponding to
the antenne of cirripeds, copepods, and other crustacea, in the adhesive papille
of the tunicate and echinoderm larve, and possibly in the tentaculate arms of
ectoproctous polyzoa, brachiopods, rhabdopleura, and phoronis.

The five primordial tentacles of the echinoderms probably represent a group
of thoracic, or abdominal appendages (Figs. 291-295); those of Cephalodiscus
and the entoproctous polyzoa represent the thoracic, or both circumoral and
abdominal groups. (Figs. 299-301.) The appendages may be absent from the
outset, or if present they may disappear completely in the adult. After the larval
period, they are never used as locomotor organs in any member of the group.
In the chetognaths, the cephalic appendages have the appearance of typical
arthropod oral appendages.

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. DEGENERATION. ATTACHMENT. 399

The nervous system is always small, exceedingly simple and primitive in
structure. Sense organs, such as visual and auditory organs, are absent, or very
rudimentary. Even in the cirripeds, the lateral and parietal eyes of the larva
quickly disappear, or become functionless. Only in a few tunicates does the
parietal eye function to any extent in the adult. A neuro-muscular apparatus,
capable of elaborate or varying responses to external stimuli, is never present.

The mode of life is rigidly prescribed by these conditions. The absence of
armored grasping appendages, of well developed sense organs, and of a complex
neuro-muscular apparatus, excludes the possibility of elaborate reflexes, of percep-
tion at a distance, of pursuit and capture. The inevitable result has been the
practically universal adoption of either a sessile, a subterranean, or a parasitic
mode of life, depending for food on micro-organisms, or on other finely divided
matter sifted from water or soil, or on fluids absorbed from other animals.

Degeneration.—There is a strong tendency in the entire group toward a
retrograde or degenerative development, that appears to be due to some prevalent
lack of adequate internal conditions or of materials. It makes its appearance
during, or shortly after the larval stages, cutting down the first promises of a clear
cut, vigorous organogeny to one that is feeble, blurred, or defective in definition;
or one in which important parts are absent. It may manifest itself in the absence
of structural detail, in diminished local outgrowths, or in the absence of appen-
dages (Amphioxus, enteropneusta, tunicates, chetognaths). It is seen in the
degenerative metamorphosis of tunicate larvee; in the reduction in size, or absence
of organs, so common in male cirripeds; and in the progressive disappearance
in many parasitic cirripeds of both sexes, of mouth, anus, appendages, nervous
system, and alimentary canal; in fact, of practically everything except the integu-
ment and reproductive organs.

In some cirripeds (rhizocephala), this process is carried so far that if it were
not for the presence of the characteristic appendages in the larve, their identity
would be exceedingly difficult, perhaps impossible, to determine. We have
merely to assume that the suppression of appendages has been carried a step
further back in the ontogeny, to account for their total absence in Amphioxus and
the enteropneusta.

In the rhizocephala, the parts of the body left after the extensive degeneration
of organs, and the casting off of the abdomen, acquire a new, almost unlimited
power of growth, forming extensive, root-like processes that penetrate in every
direction the tissues of its host. In the ectoprocta, there is also an extensive
degeneration of organs, similar to that in parasitic cirripeds. That is, the nervous
system, appendages, and alimentary canal disappear, or fail to develop, and from
the apparently formless remnants, strangely enough, buds are formed, destined to
give rise to new and more perfect zoids. It may be that there is some relation
between the degenerative, or retrograde development of the tunicates, ptero-
branchia, and polyzoa, and this retention and renewal of the power of budding.

Attachment.—We have seen that many phyllopods are temporarily attached

400 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

to foreign objects by means of a sort of sucking or adhesive disc on the hemal side
of the head. Many parasitic copepods and cirripeds are permanently attached
in this manner, aided by a pair of modified appendages that have moved round
onto the hemal side of the head. In cirripeds the larva attaches itself, head
first, neural side down; it then turns a forward handspring on its rudimentary
adhesive antenne, bringing the neural side up; meantime an enormous out-
growth develops from the hemal surface of the head, forming the peduncle by
which the animal is permanently attached. (Fig. 274.) This extraordinary
mode of attachment, accompanied by the same peculiar rotation and cephalic
outgrowth, occurs with but slight variation in the tunicates, echinoderms, ptero-
branchia, phoronida, polyzoa, and brachiopods, in fact in every subdivision of
the acraniates except Amphioxus, the enteropneusta and chetognatha.

Mantle.—Before the young cirriped becomes attached, the valves of the
thoracic shield make their appearance as a longitudinal circular fold. The free
edge of the fold gradually extends toward the neural surface, enclosing the body
and appendages in a large vestibular, atrial, or branchial chamber. (Figs. 280,
281.) A similar mantle forms a familiar and conspicuous feature in the larval
and adult stages of the tunicates (Figs. 284-286), echinoderms (Figs. 291,
295), polyzoa (Fig. 301), phoronida (Fig. 305), and brachiopods (Fig. 304). In
the polyzoa and echinoderms, the vestibule may develop very early as a closed
chamber; but it is soon ruptured by the growing appendages within, which then
protrude through the opening in the same manner as those of a cirriped. In
the enteropneusta the mantle consists of two longitudinal pleural folds that form
an imperfect branchial chamber. (Fig. 208.)

The rudimentary mantle fold is a conspicuous feature of the larve of cirripeds,
echinoderms, enteropneusta, polyzoa, phoronida, and brachiopods. Its free
margin may be drawn out into characteristic projections or lobes, that, heavily
ciliated, form the primary longitudinal ciliated band characteristic of the naupula.
It should not be confused with the transverse ciliated band characteristic of the
trochophore larva. (Figs. 267-2096.)

Skeleton.—An endocranium occurs only in the enteropneusta and cheto-
gnatha. In the enteropneusta it consists of a low grade fibro-cartilage, probably
of mesodermic origin, and comparable with the primitive endocranium of the
phyllopods. See page 312. No neural or branchial cartilages appear, but
in Amphioxus and the enteropneusta, a complicated framework of chitenoid gill
bars supports the margins of the gill clefts and the tongue bars.

The exoskeleton may consist of a voluminous chitenoid, celluloid, or gelatin-
oid secretion of the ectoderm; it is not shed at regular intervals, as in the arthropods,
but is retained throughout life. The only exception appears to be the appendicu-
laria, which often shed their enormous “gelatinous house” soon after its formation.
It may be heavily calcified, forming characteristic polygonal plates, and greatly
complicated by epidermal folds and channels containing vascular or other tissues
(cirripeds, tunicates, brachiopods).

CIRCULATION. SEXUAL ORGANS. DEVELOPMENT. 401

The Heart and Circulation.—In the acraniates the heart and the vascular
channels are feebly developed and may be altogether absent or unrecognizable.
There is no definite vascular system in the polyzoa and chetognatha; and a distinct
heart is absent in cirripeds, Amphioxus, the phoronida, and the echinoderms;
it exists, if at all, in a highly modified condition in the enteropneusta and ptero-
branchia. In the tunicates and brachiopods a small, oval heart is present. In
the ascidians it is a small fusiform tube, unsegmented and valveless, and composed
of epithelio-muscular cells. Its cavity is derived from the so-called blastoccele
and it is enclosed in a pericardium derived from the ccelom. In these respects,
and in respect to its location, the distribution of the principal blood channels,
and in its mode of development, it resembles the “heart” of phyllopods. The
tunicate heart is notable for its “reversing circulation,” that has been regarded as
something unique in the animal kingdom; but a similar phenomenon has been ob-
served by Scott, in the parasitic. copepod Lepeophtheirus. See page 418.

The Sexual Organs.—Both ovaries and testis may be present in the same
individual. In the cirripeds, the testis usually occupies the posterior part of the
trunk, opening to the exterior at the apex of the caudal lobe. The ovaries are
lodged in the cephalic region, extending also into the peduncle and mantle folds,
and even into the recesses of the exoskeleton. The oviducts open outward near
the middle of the body, at the base of the first pair of abdominal cirri. (Fig. 275.)
In the tunicates a similar condition may prevail, e.g., in Polycarpa, where “there
are many complete sets of both male and female systems attached to the inner
surface of the mantle, on both sides of the body.”” Moreover embryonic “kalym-
mocytes,” or egg follicle cells, frequently pass through the ectoderm into the cellu-
lose test, suggesting a former connection with the mantle, like that in cirripeds.

In the brachiopoda there are two pairs of genital glands, both pairs located in
the mantle, one in the anterior fold, the other in the posterior. The genital cells
are usually discharged by a pair of nephridia-like ducts that open on the neural
surface near the middle of the body, or just behind what appears to represent the
thoracic region; chetognatha, pterobranchia, polyzoa, brachiopods, phoronida.

The germ cells of arthropods may make their appearance as the so-called
pole cells at a very early period, before any germ layers are recognizable. In
parasitic copepods, they arise from the undifferentiated blastoderm, and later
form a small but conspicuous cluster of cells on the neural surface, between
the abdominal and thoracic neuromeres. (Fig. 242.) In the chetognatha and
polyzoa, the germ cells are conspicuous at an early period in a corresponding
position. (Figs. 301, 306.)

Development.

It will be necessary to abandon, or greatly modify some deep-rooted con-
ceptions as to the significance of the germ layers and early embryonic processes
in segmented animals, for they are based either on errors of observation, or upon

26

402 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

a too literal interpretation of the phenomenon of embryonic growth in terms of
adult ccelenterates. There is little or no foundation for the prevalent assumption
that the blastopore elongates, closes in the middle, leaving a mouth at one end
and an anus at the other. On the contrary, segmented animals elongate primarily
by a localized apical growth, never by stretching a gastrula lengthwise. Neither
the mesoderm nor the notochord ever helped form the walls of a primitive, func-
tional, alimentary canal, with the mesoccele opening into the enteroccele.

The principal source of confusion in the interpretation of these fundamental
processes has been the failure to recognize the difference between a true gastrula
and a mesentoccele, between a trochosphere and a naupula, neurostoma and
hemostoma, or the hemal and neural surfaces; and in assigning a fictitious and
artificial significance to the so-called ‘‘archenteron’” and “coelomic pouches.”
We base our conclusions on the following assumptions, that we regard as
axiomatic.

Fic. 267.—A, B, C, Diagrams of an annelid larva in the trochosphere, or coelentreate stages, showing the rela-
tions of the gastrula, blastopore, mouth, and anus to each other; also the origin of the trunk, as an outgrowth
from the primitive head; D, E, F, same of a molluscan larva.

1. The fixed point in all morphological problems is the central nervous
system. When it is located, and its direction of prolongation determined, we may
identify the six sides of any bilaterally symmetrical, acrogenous animal, and approx-
imately locate the characteristic organs of each side. 2. In all bilaterally sym-
metrical animals, the primitive mouth, or neurostoma, and the neuron, or axial
cords of the central nervous system, are always laid down on the same side of the
body, or egg, 7.e., the neural surface. 3. The neural surface increases in length
primarily by apical growth at the anal or posterior end of the principal axis. 4.
The right and left sides of the body are formed as lateral outgrowths from the
principal axis, the growth and differentiation being in a neuro-hemal direction.
5. The primitive mouth, or neurostoma, always lies between the anterior ends of
the lateral cords. 6. The anal or caudal end of the body is always the youngest,

MOLLUSCS AND ANNELIDS. 403

the cephalic or oral end the oldest. 7. The neural surface of the embryo is laid
down and differentiated earlier than the hemal surface, the difference between
the time of formation and the amount of specialization in the two surfaces being
governed largely by the volume and distribution of the yolk mass. See Chapter
XIII, p. 219.

There is a well marked difference between the embryonic processes in the
craniates and acraniates on the one side, and the molluscs and the annelids on the
other, due to a prevailing difference in the volume of yolk in the four groups, the
period at which the embryo is liberated, and in the unequal emphasis placed on
growth at the cephalic and caudal ends of the body.

The principal features of these groups may be summarized as follows:

A. Molluscs and Annelids.—In these animals we have a true gastrulation
in its original meaning, for the blastular infolding gives rise to endoderm only,
and the blastopore, without noticeable elongation persists as the mouth. The
mesoderm arises from cells lodged in or near the posterior lip of the blastopore.
The young usually escape from the egg as so-called trochospheres, a larval form
representing the ccelenterate phase of their development. Its characteristic
feature is a transverse, or equatorial ciliated band encircling the principal axes
between the mouth and the apical plate. (Fig. 267.)

In the annelids the trochosphere forms only the head, the body always
arising as a new local outgrowth, not by the elongation of the trochosphere
as a whole. When there is a considerable amount of yolk present, the trocho-
sphere stage may be passed within the egg membranes; in these cases the trunk is
formed by the rapid proliferation of a special group of large terminal cells, or telo-
blasts, of which there may be several kinds, each giving rise to a linear series of
some particular kind of organ, as nerve cords, nephridia, entoderm, etc.

In the molluscs the trochosphere is transformed into the adult with little or no
axial elongation.

The molluscs and annelids, therefore, are characterized by small or medium
sized eggs that pass through a true gastrulation; the blastopore persists as the
mouth, and the larva is a coelenterate-like trochosphere. ‘The germ layers of the
trunk arise simultaneously with the progress of apical growth, no one layer arises
from another, the mesoderm never forms a part of the functional enteron, and
the mesoccele never opens into the enteroccele.

B. Craniates.—In the arachnid-vertebrate stock, the embryo grows film-
like over the surface of a large body of yolk. It passes rapidly through the gas-
trula and trochosphere stages, and is retained within the egg membrane till the
trunk is well developed, rarely being liberated with less than fifteen or twenty
highly specialized metameres. (Figs. 25 to 32.)

The only recognizable remnants of the gastrula are found in the primitive
- cumulus, or circular germ disc, at the point where the primitive mouth and pro-
cephalic lobes are formed. (Figs. 25,269.) The body, or trunk, is a new formation
that has no real homologue in a ccelenterate, and it is formed solely by the multi-

404 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

plication of cells that lie beyond the limits of the true blastopore, that is on the
posterior margin of what represents the body of the gastrula. The bands of new
tissues, or organs, formed by the teloblasts, such as the nerve cords, mesoderm,
and entoderm, are usually quite distinct and preserve their normal position and
relation to one another from the outset. But as a result of diverse conditions
created by growth, the entire mass of proliferating cells may be bodily invaginated
(insects, crustacea, amphibia) forming extensive axial, or terminal, infoldings
from which the products of apical growth are gradually separated. (Fig. 269, t.p.)
These infoldings, so often confused with gastrulation, are of a purely secondary

Fic, 268.—Diagrams of a mollusean trochosphere; A ,B, in sagittal section; C, D, seen from the neuralor oral surface.
The diagrams indicate the relation between the gastrula, blastopore, mouth, and anus; and the site of apical growth.
nature and of no special phylogenetic significance. The process has nothing in
common with gastrulation, and the invaginated cells do not represent a primitive
enteron. The cavity of the infolded teloblasts may be called a teloccele, and its
external opening the telopore.

The concrescence that occurs in the craniates is the concrescence of the
peripheral margins of an expanding embryonic area, not that of an elongated
blastopore. (Fig. 157.)

m:nsb. .ms. er

Fic. 269.—Diagrams of an arthropod embryo. A. B, Sagittal sections; C, D, the embryo seen from the neural
surface. The figures indicate the relations between the gastrula, cephalic navel, neurostoma, telopore, and telo-
blasts; and the axial structures formed from the latter. Here the gastrula gives rise only to those structures be-
longing to the primitive head, or that part of the embryo derived from a coelenterate ancestor. The teloblasts,
with or without the formation of a terminal infolding, or telopore, give rise to the axial cords, out of which, like
an appendage to the old radially symmetrical head, the new, bilaterally symmetrical, segmented trunk is formed.

In the craniates, therefore, the gastrula and trochosphere stages and the
blastopore are omitted, or are but faintly repeated at the head end of the medul-
lary plate, while a conspicuous false gastrulation is produced by the infolding of
the teloblastic areas at the end of a rapidly growing trunk. The organs of the
trunk, produced by apical growth become recognizable, or separate from each
other from before backward, at varying periods in different members of the group,
and there is a general tendency to carry the development within the egg up to
later and later stages, so that the young, when liberated, usually develop into the
adult without a marked metamorphosis.

DEVELOPMENT. 405

C. The Acraniates.—In the acraniates the embryonic development takes
place under a new set of conditions and is expressed in a new set of forms. The
eggs asa rule are very small, practically devoid of yolk, and develop rapidly, with
continuous epithelial layers and folds. The gastrula stages are passed within
the egg membranes, and the embryo escapes at an early period as a small unseg-

Fic. 270.—_Semi-diagrammatic sagittal sections through the embryo and young larva of Balanoglossus, to illustrate
the relation of the neostoma and hemostoma to the gastrula, teloccele and telopore.

mented larva, or naupula, representing under various disguises the nauplius stage
of their crustacean ancestors. For such a large and diversified group of animals,
the early embryonic and larval stages are remarkably uniform. The small, more
or less transparent eggs undergo a total and nearly equal cleavage, forming a small,
hollow blastula (cirripeds excepted). No true gastrulation, such as that in the

ne meh. og. ne.

]

Fic. 271.—Diagrams of the development of a vertebrate and acraniate seen as a semi-transparent object from
the neural surface. The primitive gastrula is indicated only by the remnants of the neurostoma, now a shallow pit
lying on the floor of the procephalic lobes, and later, after the closure of the medullary plate, giving rise to the
infundibulum and the saccus vasculosus. The teloblasts have increased greatly in importance, and, like those in
the arthropods, give rise to a large terminal infolding, or false gastrula, from the walls of which the axial cords, such
as the notochord, mesoderm and endoderm are formed, These structures separate at various periods, and in
various manners, as shown by the cross-sections E—H, but in all cases the end-result is the same, and the real
sources of the axial cords are special groups of proliferating cells lying at the caudal apex of the trunk.

annelids, occurs in the group, but there is a large infolding, or mesentoccele, at
the posterior end of the blastula, in which the teloblasts and their earlier products
are involved. (Fig. 271, A.) It opens outward by a telopore that marks the
caudal end of the body, and closes near the point where the anus is formed. It
never remains open as the primitive mouth, and is never formed in the oral or
cephalic region.

The component parts of the infolded layer begin to separate, or first become

406 THE CRANIATES AND THE ACRANIATES.

recognizable, at the head end, the process extending backward with the growth
of the body. When viewed in cross-section, the mesoderm and notochord ap-
pear, at first sight, to be in the act of arising from the endoderm. (Fig. 271, G.)
As a matter of fact, what is really taking place is the belated separation of the
mesoderm bands, notochord, and endoderm from one another, while all of them
owe their origin to terminal groups of proliferating cells, just as in the typical
craniate embryos.

An enteron, or primitive gut, does not exist till after the products of telo-
blastic growth have separated, and the lateral bands of the endoderm have united
to form a closed tube. ‘The mesoderm may separate from the lateral walls of the
mesentoccele as hollow vesicles, either during (Amphioxus), or before its division
into somites, or coelomic chambers (echinoderms). In either case the process is
not a primitive, but a secondary one. It is merely another way of attaining the
same conditions seen in the annelids and arachnids, and is probably the result of
a rapid development of yolkless eggs. Owing to the almost universal absence
of a considerable volume of yolk in the acraniates, there is no terminal concres-
cence like that in the craniates.

Mouth—A functional neurostoma and primitive stomodeum are formed
between the anterior ends of the nerve cords in the cirripeds, chetognatha, echino-
derms, brachiopods, and polyzoa. In all the other sub-phyla, a vestigial, or trans-
itory neurostoma is formed as a median depression in the anterior end of the
medullary plate. It opens outward, in those forms in which the anterior end of
the medullary plate is not infolded to form a closed forebrain vesicle (enterop-
neusta, pterobranchia, phoronida, polyzoa, cheetognatha. Where the medullary
plate is infolded and closed, the neurostoma lies in the floor of the forebrain
vesicle (tunicates, Amphioxus). The infolding for the primitive mouth may be
of considerable depth, forming a true primitive stomodeum, opening perma-
nently into the mesenteron as in the case of the dorsal tubercle and subneural
gland of the tunicates; or a blind pocket may arise from the midgut, that grows
toward the primitive mouth, representing either the cut off remnant of the primi-
tive stomodeum, or that part of the midgut that formerly communicated with it.
(enteropneusta, pterobranchia, (and phoronida ?)).

The hemostoma is a new formation arising independently of the old mouth,
from the anterior hemal surface of the body.

The Naupula.—The larva of the acraniates, or the naupula, is a small,
usually free swimming, pelagic form resembling a cirriped nauplius. It may
undergo a part of its development in the brood pouches, or recesses, of the atrial
chamber (cirripeds, tunicates, echinoderms, brachiopods, and polyzoa). The
naupula differs from a trochosphere in that it represents a distinctly older phylo-
genetic stage, and undergoes a special kind of metamorphosis. It possesses a
longitudinal, circular fold, representing a larval mantle fold or carapace, that
usually has a ciliated margin. The larva comes to rest, neural side down, and
becomes permanently attached, usually by an adhesive disc, aided by rudimentary

THE C@LOM. 407

cephalic appendages. Subsequently the larva rotates, bringing its neural side
up (cirripeds. tunicates, echinoderms, polyzoa, brachiopods (?)), and the
hzmal surface of the head rapidly grows into the characteristic voluminous stalk,
or peduncle, by which the animal is permanently attached.

The Celom.—The primitive body cavity is the space enclosed between the
somatic and splanchnic mesoderm. It was probably primarily segmented, form-
ing two completely closed chambers for each metamere. On the sides and hemal
surface, the walls separating adjacent chambers tend to break down, forming
extensive sinuses containing loosely united or isolated cells (blood cells). On the
neural surface the original segmentation is usually more strongly marked and
more permanent, and certain portions may be retained, or set apart, as thin
walled chambers, lined with epithelium, and devoid of free amceboid cells or
blood corpuscles.

They may consist of a small part of a single mesoblast segment, the part
that is directly connected with the excretory or nephridial duct, or that developed
mainly as a tubular outgrowth from it (Figs. 279, 294); or several such portions
may unite to form more extensive chambers. They are lined in part by flat,
indifferent endothelium, and in part by more specialized excretory cells, and
they may open to the exterior by glandular ducts, or nephridia, of which only
the terminal portion is of ectodermic origin. These so-called coelomic chambers
are often referred to as the true ccelom, and have been regarded as the primitive
body cavity, but they are in reality either special portions of more primitive and
more extensive spaces. or the parts that remain hollow, after the other portions
have been shut off as vascular spaces or canals, or have been completely filled by
the growth of fibrous, muscular, or other tissues.

CHAPTER XXIII.
THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

I. THE CIRRIPEDS.

The cirripeds are the only members of the acraniates in which the more
typical arthropod characters are retained. They present an extraordinary diver-
sity of form and structure, but many of their peculiarities, such as the enormous
cephalic stalk, the mantle, pigmyism, the absence or disappearance of appendages,
of sensory and alimentary organs, and of external segmentation, we shall see ex-
pressed in a more stable and permanent form in other members of the group.

The Nauplius and the Naupula.—The young leave the egg like many
other primitive arthropods, in the nauplius stage, as a small, free swimming larva

Fic. 272,—Diagrams of a nauplius, based in part on Pedeschenko’s figures of Lernza; A, neural surface; B, hemal.

with three pairs of appendages. (Fig. 289.) Its minute structure is doubtless
very similar to that of a parasitic copepod. The larva of the latter being better
known, it may be taken to illustrate the structure of the nauplius, the basic larval
form of the entire group of acraniates.

In Lernea branchiata, which has been carefully studied by Pedaschenko,
the nauplius (Fig. 272), is provided with a well developed brain, br., frontal or-
gans, ol., rudimentary lateral eyes, /.e., a trioculate median eye, p.e., and stomo-
deal ganglia, st.g., very similar to those we have already seen in Branchipus, in
other phyllopods, and in Limulus. There is also a large cephalic navel, do.
(dorsal organ) that undergoes a characteristic degeneration and absorption by
the yolk cells.

Behind the mandibular ganglion the nerve cords are widely separated, but
they unite again at the caudal end, forming the rudiments of the abdominal neuro-
meres, or ventral cord. The latter increases in length by the multiplication of
prominent telo-neuroblasts. A middle cord, m.ch., is clearly indicated.

408

THE CIRRIPEDS. 409

The germ cells appear in the undifferentiated blastoderm at a very early
period, and later form a conspicuous cluster of cells in the middle of the neural
surface of the nauplius, between the separated nerve cords, g.c., in the same posi-
tion, therefore, that they have in the polyzoa and pterobranchia.

In the cirripeds two prominent longitudinal pleural folds are formed that

Fic. 273.—Limnadia lenticularis. (After Nowikoff.) x7 1/2.

represent the beginning of a two-lobed thoracic shield comparable with that of
the ostracodes and other primitive crustacea, and from which the mantle will
develop later. (Fig. 289, mt.)

In the later stages of the nauplius there is usually developed an enormous
labrum (Figs. 7, ro. 289, /.), that overhangs and conceals the mouth, and a promi-

Fig. 274.—Diagrams of a cirriped larva, illustrating its mode of attachment, revolution, and metamorphosis.

nent caudal lobe, a./., with the anus on its hemal side. An adhesive disc forms
near the apex, or the hemal surface of the head, by which the larva, for a longer
or shorter period, is attached to foreign objects.

A nauplius-like larva, with most of the characters indicated above, occurs
under various disguises and modifications in all the subphyla of the acraniates.
In its modified form we shall refer to it as the naupula.

410 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

The Metamorphosis.—In the cirripeds the larval cephalic shield is usually
very large and the body lies on its concave neural surface. Its margin is sensitized
and drawn out into very prominent horns or lobes, of which there are usually two
especially long ones in front, two behind, and minor ones between. (Fig. 289.)
After a time the caudal lobe elongates, the antenne migrate forward and hemally,
and the thoracic appendages and the rudimentary lateral eyes make their ap-
pearance.

The larva, having taken on the shape and general appearance of an ostracode
(cypress stage) which it will be recalled is one of the first forms to make its appear-

i

Fic. 275.—Semi-diagrammatic sagittal section of a cirriped. Lepas. Fic. 276.—Mouth parts of Lepas.

ance in the geological record, attaches itself to some foreign object, hamal side
down, by glandular, disc-like expansions of its first pair of appendages. (Fig.
274.) Cement glands appear and the greatly enlarged cephalic outgrowth be-
comes firmly attached. The body next turns completely over; the stalk elongates,
carying with it the remnants of the first pair of appendages, and the animal grad-
ually takes on the adult form. (Figs. 274, 275.)

Appendages.—Eleven pairs of appendages may be represented; two pairs
of antenne, three pairs of jaws, including the mandibles, and the first and second
pairs of maxille, and six pairs of abdominal appendages. With the metamor-
phosis there is a strongly marked tendency toward the reduction, or atrophy of
many important larval organs. All of the eleven pairs of appendages present in
the larve are never fully developed in the later stages. Even in the least modified
forms, the two pairs of antenne are either greatly reduced or absent; the three pairs
of jaws or oral appendages are very small, and two or three pairs of the six pairs of
abdominal appendages may be absent. Only nine pairs are present in the alcip-

THE CIRRIPEDS. ALIMENTARY CANAL. CCELOM. 4AII

pide and eight in the cryptophialide. In apodous forms only the jaws and one
pair of antennz are retained, while in the rhyzocephalide all traces of the appen-
dages disappear.

Alimentary Canal.—The stomodeum is generally small, and leads into a
large pear-shaped enteron provided with prominent gastro-hepatic glands. (Fig.
275.) The larger ones form a circle of racemose diverticula, or pouches, said to
be provided with two kinds of cells, hepatic and pancreatic, h.d.and gh. Circular
bands of smaller pouches, or patches of cells having a special structure, are ar-
ranged at regular intervals over the remainder of the stomach, diminishing in
distinctness toward the caudal end, f.c. The
anus, a, is located on the hemal side of the
elongated caudal lobe.

Coelom.—True coelomic chambers are well
developed in the cirripeds and copepods. In
Lernea ten pairs, one apparently for every
metamere except the first, have been described
by Pedaschenko. (Fig. 279, A.) They form
large segmentally arranged chambers enclosed
in thin but well defined epithelial walls. They

Fic. 277.—Petrarca mira (after Fowler); Fic. 278.—Ibla quadrivalis, male; parasitic
commensinal in the mesenteric chamber of the on the female, within the palial chamber. (From
coral Bathyactis. Ramifications of testis, ovary, Gruvel, slightly modified 3-4 mm. long.)

and liver in the mantle folds.

are completely shut off from the remaining parts of the primitive ccelom, or
hemoccele, which consists of irregular, extensive, unsegmented spaces that are
surrounded by mesoderm and contain free mesodermic cells.

In the adult cirripeds three pairs of ccelomic chambers have been recognized,
although their early history and identity are not known. (Fig. 279, B.) There
is a small pair of completely closed sacs in the head region, lined with excretory
cells that probably represent the remnants of the antennary ccelom and the anten-
nary gland, c’. The second pair lie in the thoracic or circumoral region, on
either side of, and close to, the stomach, c?. They are extensive chambers that
communicate with each other across the median line, in front of and behind the
mouth (Gruvel). They are completely separated from the hemoccele, but open

412 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

to the exterior through the nephridia-like ducts of the shell gland, mv.d. They
probably represent the’ combined thoracic coeloms together with the excretory
portion of the “shell gland” or “coxal gland” of the second pair of maxille.
The third pair, c*, lie external to and somewhat behind the second. They are
completely closed, and probably represent the remnants of several pairs of united
abdominal ccelomic chambers.

Excretory Organs.—Two pairs of nephridia-like excretory organs are
conspicuous in the arthropods and remarkably constant in their location. The
so-called green gland of the second antennz, and the shell gland of the second
maxillz of crustacea (coxal gland of the fifth pair of thoracic appendages in
arachnids). ‘The characteristic thin-walled end sac of these organs is derived
from a portion of the ccelom, but a variable one. It may represent a single

Fic. 279.—Diagrams to illustrate the relations of the ccelomic chambers, and their excretory ducts, to the
main subdivisions of the body (tagmata) and to the central nervous system. A, Larval copepod (Lernza); B, an
adult cirriped; C, Balanoglossus.

somite (Limulus) or a small part of one (Lernza), or the whole, or a part of several
combined somites (cirripeds and other acraniates).

In the cirripeds the excretory organs of the fifth metamere have very volum-
inous end sacs, c”, and the nephridia-like tubes that lead off from them open at
the base of the second pair of maxille. A small pair of excretory sacs lie in the
head region in front of the mouth that probably represent the remnants of the
antennary glands of other crustacea.

The sexual organs are of exceptional volume in the cirripeds, the racemose
testis ramifying through the whole trunk and opening at the apex of the modified
tail lobe. (Fig. 275.) The location of the ovaries is noteworthy in that they
lie mainly in the cephalic stalk and anterior portion of the mantle, the ovarian
lobules, in some cases, extending into the recesses of the exoskeleton. The
oviduct opens outward near the middle of the body, at the base of the anterior
pair of abdominal appendages, o.d.

THE CIRRIPEDS. DEGENERATION. 413

In the more degenerate cirripeds, the sexes are separate, and the males are
reduced to minute forms parasitic on the females. (Figs. 278-281.)

Degeneration.—The wide range of variation in the cirripeds is largely
due to the varying amount of degeneration following the metamorphosis. The
mantle, integument, and sexual organs are often the only parts that retain the
normal powers of growth. The degeneration may be manifest in the dimin-
ished size of the whole body, and by the absence, or dwindling of appendages,
muscles, alimentary canal, sense organs, and nervous system. The anal opening

Ale.pped

280

| (a %
S (/ ,

Fic. 281,
Fic. 280.—A, Alcippe lampas, female; about 8 mm. long; B, male, parasitic on disc of female; about 1 mm.

long. Probable position of the remnants of the mouth, indicated at m; cement glands and alimentary canal,
absent; excretory organs closed (?). (After Berndt, slightly modified.)
Fic. 281.—C, Scalpellum vulgare, dwarf male; surface view; D, in optical section. Fixed to the hermaph-
roditic individuals; mouth and ailmentary canal absent. (After Scott, slightly modified.)

may close (Petrarca, Fig. 277, females of Alcippe, Fig. 280), or the proctodeum,
stomodzum, and the entire mesenteron may disappear, as in the dwarf males
of Scalpellum (Fig. 281), of Alcippe (Fig. 280), and many copepods (Figs. 282
and 283).

It is doubtful whether these dwarf males survive long after the maturation
of the spermatozoa, but there is a certain vegetative vigor in the surviving organs
of the larger individuals, z.e., females and hermaphrodites, that is not so seri-
ously affected by degeneration.

The Old Mouth and the New.—A highly significant aspect of degeneration
in cirripeds is the closing of the mouth (neurostoma), and the dwindling or dis-

4I4 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

appearance of the stomodeum. We have already witnessed a tendency in this
direction, in the arachnid-vertebrate stock, and the origin of a new mouth,
or hemostoma, from the dorsal organ, or cephalic navel, p. 253. Similar condi-
tions are latent in the cirripeds. A typical embryonic dorsal organ is a conspic-
uous feature in the young nauplius of Lernea and of many other primitive crus-
tacea. Its invagination, or ingrowth into the yolk, followed by disintegration
and absorption, probably played an important part in establishing a permanent
opening into the enteron at this point, from which, in the other sub-phyla of the
acraniates, the new mouth arose. The exact way in which the new opening

. an 1
av md.mx mx i : ov.

Ly

ex’ ‘ake ,

M Lecnea. oe

Fic. 282.—Lernza branchialis, A, Young fertilized female; B, penella stage; fertilized female in gill of Whiting; C,
adult female, attached. (After Scott, slightly modified.)

was established, and its relation to the adjacent gut pouches, to the adhesive
glands, and to the cephalic stalk are not clear because very little is known about
the details of these important structures. But it is certainly significant that in the
rhizocephala, where the old mouth closes, the animals manage to survive by the
absorption of nutrition through the root-like outgrowth of the cephalic stalk that
is formed at the place where the dorsal organ closes. ‘The condition in Tubicinella
is likewise suggestive, for Gruvel states, p. 279, that according to Marloth, the
tubicinelle secrete a peptonizing ferment that diffuses through the membranous
base, transforming into peptones the albuminoid substances of the skin of the whale,
to which these forms are attached. Without doubt we have here a glimpse of the
way in which the old mouth disappeared, and the way in which the new one was

THE TUNICATES. 415

formed that became the hemostoma of the tunicates, enteropneusta, and other
acraniates.

It is often assumed that a sessile or parasitic mode of life is the initial cause
of degeneration. The various anatomical peculiarities common to the copepods,
cirripeds, and acraniates do not bear out this conclusion. The fact that in these
diverse sub-phyla we see the same shifting of cephalic appendages to the hemal
side, the same cephalic outgrowths, and the same degeneration of the neuro-
muscular organs, indicates that there are certain initial defects, or peculiarities
of germinal material, common to the whole group, that is the underlying cause of
a defective organization, and the defective organization is in every case of such
a nature that a sessile, or parasitic, or vegetative mode of life is the only one
possible.

ie peophtheicus : Caligus.
Fic. 283.—Lepeoptheirus. D, Hemal, &, neural surface. F,G, Caligus. (From Scott, slightly modified.)

II. THE TUNICATES.

It was from a stock similar to that of the copepods and cirripeds, and one
dominated by the same fundamental defects in germinal material, that the
tunicates arose. They are built on the same general plan, pass through a similar
larval existence, and undergo a similar retrograde metamorphosis. But all this
is at first sight effectively disguised by the permanent closing of the old mouth,
and the opening of a new one on the hemal surface; by the absence of both the
chitenous and calcareous exoskeleton and appendages; and by the conspicuous
development of perforated gill sacs, and of the middle cord, or notochord. Like
the cirripeds they begin life with the same brave display of animal vigor, of well
developed brain, eyes, and locomotor organs that bespeak an efficient past and a
hopeful future, only to have them dwindle almost to extinction in a peaceful,
sedentary existence.

The early stages of the tunicate embryo are essentially like those of a primi-
tive crustacean (Moina, Cetochiles, Balanus, or Palemon). In both types there
is the same kind of cleavage; the same terminal proliferation or infolding to form
a teloccele; the same slipper-shaped medullary plate; the same middle cord or

416 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

notochord arising from the ectoderm and projecting forward from the anterior
lip of the teloccel; the same lateral bands of mesoderm; the same kind of trioculate
median eye; the same infolding of the medullary plate on the neural side of the
head to form the primitive stomodzum, or subneural gland, and a similar organ
on the opposite side of the head representing an acUtal or a potential hemostoma;
and a similar larval metamorphosis.

When the tunicate larva escapes from the egg, three glandular tubercles
appear on the anterior hemal surface of the head, representing the remnants
of arthropod cephalic appendages. After a short, free swimming existence, it
attaches itself by these appendages to some foreign object, head down, and in a
nearly vertical position, and then begins its metamorphosis. (Fig. 284, A.) It
undergoes a partial rotation, turning neural side up; the cephalic tubercles are
gradually merged in the larger cephalic stalk; the body contracts, taking on a pro-

Fic. 284.—Diagrams illustrating the mode of fixation and the metamorphosis of an ascidian,

nounced curvature that draws the head end upward toward the root of the tail;
the latter atrophies, and with the growth of the mantle, the remnants of the body
are completely enclosed in the large atrial chamber.

In Figs. 285 and 286 I have attempted to show, in a purely diagrammatic way,
the manner in which a cirriped-like animal could be metamorphosed into a
tunicate. These figures should be compared with what actually takes place in a
tunicate (Fig. 284), and with the conditions that actually occur in the metamorpho-
sis of a typical cirriped, such as Lepas (Fig. 274), or with that which prevails in
the adult condition of more degenerate cirripeds, such as Ibla and Alcippe,
Scalpellum, Petrarca, and Sacculina. (Figs. 278 and 280.)

With the atrophy of the body, the notochord disappears and the elongated
nerve cord is reduced to a small, compact cerebral ganglion which, like that in
many parasitic cirripeds, still surrounds the proximal end of the old stomodeum,
z.e., the subneural gland, s.g.

In the cirripeds (Lepas), the anterior end of the enteron forms an immense
chamber with numerous enteric pouches arranged in transverse bands. (Fig.

THE TUNICATES. THE HEART AND VASCULAR SYSTEM. 417

275.) In the tunicates similarly arranged enteric pouches are formed, which
unite with the lateral walls of the body, or with infolded rudimentary appen-
dages, forming gill clefts that lead from the enteron into the atrial or peribranchial
chamber, and thence to the exterior.

* * * * * * * * *

The Heart and Vascular System.—In both tunicates and cirripeds the
vascular system is imperfectly developed; nevertheless there are some interesting
points for comparison. In the tunicates there is a short, oval heart on the poster-
ior heemal surface of the thoracic region. It issimilar in form and location to that
in primitive crustacea, and the general arrangement of the associated blood chan-
nels is also similar.

Fics. 285, 286.—Diagrams illustrating the manner in which a sessile, cirriped-like arthropod is supposed to give
rise to a tunicate. A-—D, Seen from the side; E-H, same, seen from the neural surface.

In the cirripeds the heart is absent. But in many of the primitive, short-
bodied crustacea, a heart is present, and consists of a short oval sac containing
but one pair of openings (cladocera, Fig. 9, #.), or a small number of them.
It no doubt arises in typical arthropod fashion from the fusion of the lateral meso-
derm plates of the posterior thoracic metameres. The circulation in the tunicates
is chiefly remarkable for the periodic reversal of the direction in which the blood
is made to flow, a condition generally assumed to occur nowhere else in the animal
kingdom.

In the copepods a slowly pulsating heart, similar in appearance to that of
cladocera, may be present, but in parasitic forms it is said to be absent, although
there are certain channels through which the blood flows in a definite direction.
In Lepeophtheirus, for example, according to Scott,* the circulation, while wholly

Liverpool Marine Biol. Com. Memoirs. VI, 1901.

27

418 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

lacunal, follows well marked channels. The remarkable part of it is that the blood
currents, as he states, “Do not continue to flow for any length of time in the one
direction. At one period they may be flowing as indicated... . . They then
suddenly slacken and reverse and stream for a time in exactly the opposite course.”
(p. 21.) In this particular, therefore, the circulation is astonishingly like the
well known reversing circulation of the tunicates.

The Eyes.—In the tunicates the lateral eyes are absent, as they are in the
adult stages of cirripeds and all other acraniates. The parietal eye, however, may
be retained, and in some forms, as Salpa, it may be present and even well
developed in the adult stages, resembling 'in a very striking manner the nauplius
eye, or trioculate median ocellus of primitive crustaceans.

The details of its early development are obscure, especially the manner in
which the several retinas are infolded and become lodged on the roof of the neural

Fic. 287.—The forebrain, ventral cord, and ocelli of Cyclosalpa, chain form, adult. A, Seen from the neural sur-
face; B, in cross-section; C, in longitudinal section. (After Metcalf, slightly modified.)

tube. Judging from the structure of the eye, and from what is known of the de-
velopment of the medullary tube, the tunicate parietal eye appears to develop
in essentially the same manner as the median eye of Branchipus. In other words,
it is to be regarded as a true parietal eye, consisting of two pairs of ocelli, the
retinas of which have become loosely united to form the walls of a common
unpaired vesicle, opening into the cavity of the forebrain, and forming a part
of its roof. (Fig. 287.) The eye is innervated by two principal nerves, », that
arise from a dorsal ganglionic mass, probably representing the forebrain plus the
optic ganglia.

The Old Mouth and the New.—When the medullary plate, which represents
the entire brain and nerve cord of the ancestral arthropod, was infolded, the parietal
eye and primitive stomodeum were carried in with it, and when the medullary
tube finally closed, the primitive mouth and the stomodeum were permanently
shut off from the exterior; but they retained their original structure and relations
essentially unchanged, for the stomodeum persisting as the subneural gland and its
duct, opens at its outer end, through the floor of the embryonic brain into the
rudimentary cerebral vesicle; while the inner end still opens into the enteron as
the so-called dorsal tubercle. (Figs. 284-286.)

THE TUNICATES. THE MANTLE. 419

In the adult Salpa the oval ventral portion of the brain (Fig. 287, m.ce), from
which arise numerous pairs of peripheral nerves, and which formed the floor of
the anterior part of the medullary plate, probably represents the condensed rem-
nants of several thoracic neuromeres. The dorsal portion, p.ce., represents the
primitive forebrain, or supracesophageal ganglion. The cavity, or space between
them, represents the rudiments of a cerebral ventricle. Before the neural tube is
completely closed, the subneural gland, or primitive stomodzeum, opens into this
space and thence to the exterior (Fig. 287, C.)

The new mouth, or hemostoma, arises from the opposite side of the head,
in the region of the cephalic naval, or dorsal organ.

The Mantle.—A characteristic feature of the tunicates is the thick, fibroid,
translucent secretion of the ectoderm that forms a flexible covering for them, and
that takes the place of the ectodermal skeleton of arthropods. In its general
appearance and consistency it is not unlike the softer forms of chiten; but it
differs from it chemically, consisting of a special substance, tunecine, said to be
identical with cellulose, although it is doubtful whether a more careful analysis
will bear out this conclusion. It may be regarded, provisionally as some modifi-
cation of chiten, or of a closely related substance.

At an early stage of development, it is invaded by numerous spindle- or star-
shaped cells, differing in character and in origin; some arise from the ectoderm,
others from the mesoderm, others from the ovary. It is also broken up by the
presence of canals and spaces that permit the invasion of blood-vessels and other
tissues, and there are occasional deposits in it of calcareous and silicious specules.
In one form, Chelyosoma, it consists of “horny plates” that recall those of
cirripeds.

The mantle of tunicates may be regarded as a special modification of the
exoskeleton of arthropods, resembling most nearly that of the cirripeds. The
cirripeds have a type of exoskeleton not known to occur elsewhere in the arthropods;
it, therefore, has a special interest and significance for us. Unfortunately, I have not
had an opportunity to examine at first hand into the details of its minute structure
and development. It develops, according to Gruvel, underneath, or inside, the
hypodermis of the mantle, by the secretion of concentric or parallel layers of
chiten which then become heavily calcified. It is never cast off, and continues
to increase in volume during life.

In the early stages, the chitenous matrix is crowded with regular spaces, each
containing a live cell, which however dies with the progress of mineralization.
(Gruvel, p. 362.) In Pachylasma (Fig. 288, A), the shell consists of two principal
layers, an outer one of small chambers with thick laminated walls secreted by
infoldings of the hypodermis, #, and a basal layer derived from the inner surface
of the mantle, m./. In Balanus (Fig. 288, B), the outer layer contains large spaces
or parietal canals, cn., and the hypodermis, , extends inward in the form of
spreading or branching plates. The peripheral spaces or parietal canals, cn.,
were formed by ingrowths from the inner layer of the mantle and contain, for a

420 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

time, living tissue. In Corunula, the shell contains large spaces which stand in
direct communication with the central cavity of the test, and in which is imbedded
that part of the ovary that gives rise to the eggs. (Gruvel, p. 368.)

The remarkable structure of the shell in the cirripeds recalls that of Limulus
and Pteraspis (Figs. 196-204.) At the same time the invasion of its matrix by
isolated hypodermal cells, by pyramidal ingrowths of the mantle, and by ovarian
tubules, is comparable respectively with the presence of the test cells, vascular in-
growths, and the so-called “kalymmocytes,” or egg follicle cells, in the mantle of

Fic. 288.—Sections of the shell of cirripeds. A, Pachylasma; B, Balanus. (Afte: Gruvel.)

the tunicates. The principal difference, therefore, between the exoskeleton of the
tunicates and the complicated ectodermal skeleton of Limulus, the pteraspids, and
the cirripeds apparently lies in the different chemical composition of the non-
cellular matrix.

Tunicates and Cirripeds. Summary.

It is unnecessary to carry our comparison into further detail. The structure
and mode of growth of the tunicates justify the conclusion that they are descended
from animals in which the salient characteristics of primitive arthropods were
fully established; in fact, from that particular subdivision of the arthropods to
which the cirripeds and copepods belong. Here some inherent defects in the
germinal material impose on both ancestors and descendants those peculiarities
of structure and mode of life that are common to both.

The tunicates resemble the cirripeds: 1. In the structure of their larve, in
their mode of attachment, and in their subsequent revolution, degeneration, and
metamorphosis. 2. In the investment of the body by a huge fold of the skin, or
mantle, that encloses an atrial, or peribranchial, chamber. 3. In the outgrowth
that arises from the hzemal surface of the head to form the stalk or pedicle. 4. In
the occurrence of a reversing circulation. 5. In the presence of a parietal, tri-
occellate eye. 6. In the presence of an exoskeleton, which in the one, consists of a
calcified, chitenous secretion of the ectoderm; in the other of a substance resem-
bling cellulose; each has a complex and unusual structure, but one that is essentially
the same in both. 7. In the tunicates, the enteric pouches have perforated the
body wall; the old mouth is permanently closed, and a new one has opened on the

THE ECHINODERMS. 421

anterior hemal surface of the head. On the other hand, in the cirripeds the gut
pouches may have an arrangement in transverse rows similar to that in the tuni-
cates; the old stomodzeum often closes up and ceases to function, while the cephalic
navel may form a temporary opening into the enteron, in the place where the new
tunicate mouth is formed; and in the parasitic cirripeds the region of the cephalic
navel may actually serve for the absorption of nutrition.

Thus many important conditions essential to the evolution of tunicates are
present in cirripeds, and on the whole the present structure of the tunicates is
more like that of cirripeds than that of any other known animals.

III. THe ECHINODERMS.

The echinoderms must be assigned a position in our scheme because they
appear to be in some way connected with the enteropneusta, and hence with the
tunicates and with the main phylum from which the chordates arose. The prob-
lem is a difficult one. It demands some explanation of the apparent resemblance
between echinoderms, enteropneusta, and tunicates, and if there is a real resem-
blance, indicating genetic relationship, it calls on us to harmonize the probable
origin of the echinoderms with the explanation we have given above for the origin
of the other chordate phyla. The key that unlocks this series of problems and
places at our disposal a consistent and ever ready explanation of the multitude of
details involved, must indeed be the master key.

The echinoderms are notable for their contrasts and contradictions. Their
outward appearance and their pronounced radial structure distinguish them from
all other animals, and at first sight suggest a very primitive organization similar to
that of the coelenterates. On the other hand, they display a high degree of histo-
logical and anatomical specialization that is in marked contrast with their low
grade of organic efficiency. ‘They begin their early embryonic development with
a bilaterally symmetrical body and with clear indications of metamerism, only to
change it in the later stages for one that is radially symmetrical, and in which all
outward traces of metamerism have disappeared. After a short free swimming
larval existence they attach themselves, neural side down, by means of larval
appendages and a cephalic outgrowth; they then turn neural side up, and remain
so attached for life; or, in some cases, they give up their sessile existence and again
become free, moving slowly about, neural side down.

There are, therefore, three chief characteristics of the echinoderms that
demand our first consideration: The early, bilateral symmetry and metamerism;
the sessile life and mode of attachment by cephalic outgrowths; and the asymmetry.
There appears to be but one explanation for these remarkable conditions, which
is as follows: The early development of bilateral symmetry and metamerism in
the echinoderms, and the presence of a teloccele and telopore in place of the more
primitive gastrula and blastopore, clearly indicate that they had their origin in
bilaterally symmetrical animals of the acraniate type, that had already acquired a

422 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

considerable degree of complexity. These ancestral forms probably belonged to
the cirriped group, for before the latent asymmetry becomes effective the young
echinoderm larva resembles a cirriped in its form, mode of attachment, and sub-
sequent metamorphosis, more than any other animal.

The radiate structure of the later stages was due to a persistent local defect,
or to the absence of a definite part of the embryonic formative material, which in
turn created a condition of unstable organic equilibrium, the result of which is that
the whole side, following the path of least resistance, bends toward the defective
area, forming an arch that increases in curvature till an approximate equilibrium
is again attained by the union of its two ends to forma circle. The original half
metameres and segmental organs are then arranged in radiating lines, thus creat-
ing a new radiate type and a new set of internal conditions that dominate the
future growth of the organism.

If we assume that a strongly marked asymmetry, like that which occurs so
frequently as an abnormality in Limulus, or even as a normal character in the

:

Fic, 289,—Cirriped larve. #, Early nauplius stage, seen from the neural surface; F, from the side; G, metanauplius
sage. Semi-diagrammatic.

bopeiride and paguride, was a fixed feature of the hypothetical ancestral cirripeds,
and was capable of a successful organic adjustment, we shall have a perfectly
simple and natural explanation of the origin and structure of the echinoderms,
and of their resemblance to the tunicates, enteropneusta, and to the other chordate
phyla.

* * * * * * * * *

The Echionderm Larva.—A young echinoderm larva may be represented
in a generalized diagrammatic form as shown in Figs. 291, 293. In form and
structure it is much like the familiar cirriped nauplius, but differs from it in general
appearance, largely because it has no chitenous covering, and because it begins
its free swimming existence (the absence of yolk demanding an early liberation of

THE ECHINODERM LARVA. 423

the embryo) with the aid of cilia instead of appendages. But in both larve there
is the same enormous labrum, /.; the same caudal lobe, al., with its similarly placed
anus; the same lateral thoracic folds enclosing a central depressed area; a similarly
located adhesive disc, and the same simple, U-shaped, alimentary canal.

The ciliated band is one of the characteristic features of the echinoderm larva.
It has been compared with the prototroch of annelids and molluscs, but it is of an
entirely different nature. Its main course is longitudinal, and when completed it
surrounds the neural surface only (Fig. 293, mé.) on the other hand, the proto-
troch is always equatorial, extending around the long axis, across both neural and
hemal surfaces. (Fig. 267, ft.)

Fic. 290. Fic. 291.

Fic. 290.—A hypothetical cirriped-like larva, in which the posterior part of the trunk is taking on a false
radial symmetry due to the absence of the left half of the middle group of metameres. The figure is designed to
illustrate the probable origin of radial symmetry in the echinoderms.

Fic. 291.—Diagram of a late stage in the development of a star-fish larva. The asymmetrical metanauplius
stage, before the asymmetry has produced the characteristic radial structure of the later stages.

The ciliated band of the echinoderm larva is merely an adaptation, or modi-
fication, of the thickened and sensory margins of the thoracic folds and of the
preoral and caudal lobes. In embryonic arthropods, the margins of the thoracic
folds, and to a less degree those of the preoral and caudal lobes, are studded with
rows of minute hairs, many of which are sensory. Long before the folds are actu-
ally formed, or any chitenous covering is secreted, their future location is clearly
indicated by a deeply stained, thickened band of ectoderm. In Limulus the band is
first formed as two lateral thickenings, which extend forward and backward,
unite, and form a continuous girdle around the neural surface. (Figs. 140-142.)

When the echinoderm larva grows older, the ciliated band is thrown into folds,
or tentacle-like lobes (Fig. 292), the larger ones corresponding, approximately,
to the marginal outgrowths so characteristic of the cirripeds. (Figs. 289 and 290.)

424 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

The apparent difference between them, therefore, is largely due to the absence
of chiten in one case and its presence in the other.

The Larval Cephalic A ppendages.—The ciliated lobes of the echinoderm larva
must not be confounded with primitive appendages, with which they have nothing
in common. The true larval appendages appear in the same place as the cephalic
appendages of the nauplius, that is, on the neural side of the head in front of the
mouth, and in the angle between the lateral margin of the thorax and the preoral
lobe. (Figs. 290, 291, 292, c.a.p.) There appear to be two pairs; or at least when

Fic. 292z.—Star-fish larve, seen as opaque objects, illustrating the mode of fixation and the metamorphosis.
Semi-diagrammatic.

they have attained their full development and have taken up their final position
on the projecting surface of the head, there are three appendages, an
unpaired one lying beyond the adhesive disc, and one on each side of it. (Fig.
291, ¢.a.p.) Each appendage is thick-walled and muscular, with a long basal por-
tion and a short terminal knob studded with small adhesive papille. At this
time they greatly resemble the three cephalic appendages of a tunicate larva
(Figs. 284, 285), or the minute adhesive antenne of the cirripeds and parasitic
crustacea. (Figs. 274, 278, 280, 283.)

Attachment.—The young star-fish larva is said to attach itself voluntarily
at first and for a short time only. Later it becomes permanently attached, head
first and neural side down, in the same remarkable manner as a young cirriped,

THE ECHINODERMS. ATTACHMENT. DEVELOPMENT. 425

both the cephalic appendages and adhesive disc taking part in the process. (Fig.
292, F.) In the more primitive echinoderms, such as the crinoids (Antedon), the
metamorphosis is even more illuminating. The larva attaches itself wholly by
means of the cephalic disc, as the adhesive appendages appear to be absent. Its
first position is with the neural, or oral surface down, as in the cypress stage of the
cirriped. (Figs. 274, A and 295, D.) The disc then elongates, forming a slender
cephalic stalk, or peduncle, and the larva turns a somersault, bringing its neural
side uppermost. Meantime the vestibule, or peribranchial chamber, which at
first is small and temporarily closed, enlarges, then ruptures, and the five appen-
dages project from the cup-like head, in typical cirriped fashion. (Fig. 295, G.)
The cirriped stage (pentacrinoid) is, however, a transitory one, and the young
Antedon becomes a free swimming feather-star, by the breaking down of the
stalk and the elongation of the appendages.

There are many other representatives of the more modern echinoderms in
which the fixed stage is temporary (asteroidea) or appears to be omitted altogether
(ectinoidea and holothurioidea), and the young echinoderm, after its metamor-
phosis, again acquires a limited power of locomotion. But in the most primitive
echinoderms, such as the stalked crinoids, blastoids, and cystoids, a permanent
attachment by an elongated cephalic stalk, in typical cirriped fashion, was the
almost invariable rule, and no doubt represented the primitive condition for the
whole class. When an echinoderm does become free, it acquires only a very
limited power of locomotion and of coordinated movement. Its characteristic
lack of efficiency in this respect is due, not so much to its simple or primitive struc-
ture, as to the fact that its freedom was gained at a late period in the phylogeny of
a very ancient group, where sessile inaction was the prevailing condition.

Early Embryonic Development.—Let us now return to the early embryonic
stages to trace the beginning of the metameres, ccelomic cavities, and thoracic
appendages. ‘These structures, when definitely formed, have the same or a very
similar structure, location, and mutual relation that they have in the arthropods;
but they make their appearance in a somewhat different manner, and at relatively
different times, owing largely to the absence of yolk, which has here, as elsewhere,
an important influence over the method and relative rate of development.

The Telocele —After cleavage, which resembles that of the cirripeds, a
blastula is formed; from its walls many mesenchyme cells arise, comparable with
those which in so many arthropods wander into the yolk from the blastoderm.
They are usually more numerous at the point where later the so-called “gastrula”’
infolding takes place. But this infolding is formed at the caudal end, and extends
forward, like the products of all teloblastic growth; and it finally closes in the anal
region, not the oral. (Fig. 293.) We have already seen (p. 219), that the real
gastrula is always developed at the head end; that the resulting endoderm grows
from its point of origin backward, never forward; that the true gastrula opening
always persists, if at all, as the oral opening; it is always associated with the sto-

426 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

modeal infolding; it never gives rise to coelomic epithelium; and is never coinci-
dent with the anus.

It is evident, therefore, that the terminal infolding of the blastula in the
echinoderm, #f., is in nowise comparable with the true gastrula of molluscs and
annelids. It does represent, however, the apical infolding of arthropods (teloccele
and telopore) and gives rise, as it does there, to the main mass of the postoral
mesoderm and endoderm, but which are here temporarily united to form a
continuous layer. Whatever remnant of the true gastrula is preserved in the
echinoderms must be looked for at the anterior end of the neural surface, at the
point where the primitive mouth arises.

Fic. 293.—Semi-diagrammatic-figures illustrating the development of echinoderm larve.

The Mesoderm and the Celom.—After the teloccele is formed, the primitive
mesoderm and endoderm that form its walls separate, the latter giving rise to the
enteron, the former to the paired anlagen of the mesoderm (hydro-enteroccele).
The peculiar way in which these two layers separate is merely a specialized process
of differentiating the lateral bands of mesoderm and endoderm, and is pecu-
liar to segmented animals with a very small percentage of yolk, and which develop
with extreme rapidity (Amphioxus, Balanoglossus, etc.).

The mesodermic vesicles thus formed then break up on each side into two or
three main divisions. They are not to be regarded as primitive mesoblastic seg-
ments, but as groups of imperfectly divided ones, corresponding probably to the
three groups, or tagmas, so commonly present in the arthropods, one belonging
to the head, one to the thorax, and one to the abdomen. (Figs. 293, 294.)

The middle section of one side then divides imperfectly into the five chambers
of the hydroccele, /:.c., which represent five thoracic somites. If any segmentation
occurs in the other vesicles of either side, it is imperfect, and of short duration.

THE ECHINODERMS. C@LOM. APPENDAGES. EXCRETORY ORGANS. 427

The thoracic somites, as in the arthropods, remain relatively small and without
lateral plates, and do not expand laterally onto the hemal surface.

The more posterior division of the mesoderm, ad.cl., probably represents
several abdominal somites and lateral plates which have combined to form the
general body cavity, or ceelom. Like the corresponding structure in the arach-
nids (Fig. 138), it extends rapidly in a cephalic, hemal, and caudal direction, till it
meets the opposite coclom. (Fig. 294, E.F.) The mesentery formed by this
union naturally lies to one side of the median hemal line owing to the unequal
growth of the two chambers.

Thus the principal difference between the mesoderm in a young echinoderm,
as shown in mercator projection (Fig. 294, F.), and that of an arachnid (Fig.
138), lies in the asymmetrical development of the mesoderm and in the absence
of segmentation in the abdominal ccelom.

Thoracic Appendages.—Sometime after the five chambers of the hydroccele
appear, finger-like outgrowths of the ectoderm are formed over the thoracic
somites. They are the five primary tentacles, or tube feet, which represent five
modified thoracic appendages, th.ap. An outgrowth of the underlying somite
grows into each appendage, in typical arthropod fashion, but instead of breaking
up into separate muscles for the appendage it remains permanently in the form
of a membranous diverticulum of the hydroccel, and becomes the distal end of
a radiating water vascular canal. Only the distal end of the original appendage
separates from the body as the primary tentacle; the remainder of the appendage,
however long it may eventually become, may be regarded as lying in the surface
ectoderm, developing on either side, as it increases in length, paired cirri that
become the double row of tube feet for each arm, and into each of which a pro-
longation of the water vascular canal extends. (Fig. 294, G.)

Excretory Organs.—A portion of the ccelom, probably belonging to the cephalic
division, undergoes a special modification. A narrow dorso-lateral outgrowth
arises from it that unites with an ectodermic infolding on the anterior aboral, or
hemal surface. From it develops the stone canal and the madreporite. (Fig.
294, ec.d.) The ectodermic opening places the hydroccele in communication with
the exterior, so that the organ has often been compared, in whole or in part, to
an annelid excretory organ or nephridium. It is, however, more like one of the
typical excretory organs of the head region of the arthropods (shell gland, green
-gland, coxal gland) which consists of thin-walled ccelomic sacs, with a thick-walled
tubular outgrowth of varying length, united to a short duct, infolded from the
ectoderm. The hemal location of the external opening to the duct in the echino-
derms is no doubt due to the same causes that have carried the corresponding,
or at least adjacent, cephalic appendages to the hemal surface, not only in the
echinoderms, but in the entomostraca, cirripeds and tunicates.

The Formation of the Disc.—By the time the larva is attached, the asymmetry
of the thoracic region has become very pronounced, due to the fact that practically
all the growth is now taking place on the right side of the thorax. In the cephalic

428 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

and caudal regions the asymmetry is less apparent. (Fig. 294.) As the right
half of the oral surface of the thorax takes on a circular form, its hemal surface
divides into five thickened, tubercular, and calcareous plates, each plate corre-
sponding to one of the thoracic appendages and representing the right half of a tho-
racic tergite. (Figs. 290, 292.) Each of the five plates, or half tergites, becomes
the aboral surface of a starfish arm. The cephalic and caudal ends of the thorax
finally unite, forming the five-rayed body of the new animal. (Figs. 294, 292, G.)
The mouth, m, is drawn into the center of the neural surface, and is surrounded
by the remnants (right half?) of the nerve cord, while the five pedal nerves form
the radiating nerves of the arms, and the thoracic ccelomic chambers form the
circular and radiating water vascular canals. The anus and madrepore are
crowded toward the center of the hemal surface.

Fic 294.—Diagrams illustrating the probable origin of the echinoderms from asymmetrical, cirriped-like larve.
The larval organs are seen from the neural surface, in mercator projection. E, Hypothetical symmetrical larva; F,
hypothectia asymmetrical larva; G, the radially symmetrical echinoderm.

When the circle is completed, the head of the larva is either gradually drawn
into the disc and absorbed, or according to Corens and Danielson, it is amputated,
and for a short time may lead a separate existence after its separation from the
posterior part of the body, thus recalling the amputation thatoccurs in Sacculina
near the close of its metamorphosis, except that here it is the head alone that
survives; the abdomen dies.

The Vestibule, or Peribranchial Chamber.—In the starfish, during the forma-
tion of the appendages, the neural surface of the thoracic region is depressed and
partly enclosed by the thoracic folds, forming a rudimentary atrial or vestibular
chamber into which the primary tentacles project like the appendages of an ar-
thropod into the peribranchial chamber. In Echinus and Antedon, the right peri-
branchial chamber deepens at a very early period and forms a closed vestibule,
from the floor of which the five primary tentacles develop in the usual way.
(Fig. 295, D.) Finally the membranous roof of the vestibule ruptures, allowing
the appendages to protrude (Fig. 295, G), as they do in a cirriped, or in a
polyzoan, (Fig. 301.)

Asymmeiry.—The morphology of the echinoderms is dominated by a
strongly marked asymmetry. While asymmetry of originally symmetrical
animals is no doubt common enough as an embryonic abnormality, it is rarely

THE ECHINODERMS. ASYMMETRY. 429

retained to any marked extent as a permanent feature of the adult. It is, how-
ever, a familiar occurrence in the bopeiride and paguride, although in the last
two cases it affects only the terminal metameres, producing various degrees of
curvature, but in no wise disguising their morphological characters.

In Limulus, a considerable number of half embryos are always present in
material that has been produced and developed under apparently normal condi-
tions; such embroyos probably occur in other arthropods more frequently than
we have supposed. The half embryos, in their readjustment to the new con-
ditions of growth, inevitably take on a bow-shaped, spiral, or semicircular form,
and may live for several months, although I have never known them to develop
beyond the trilobite stage.

Fic, 295.—Diagrams illustrating the development and metamorphosis of a crinoid (Antedon). C, Plan of an
early stage seen from the neural surface in mercator projection; D, E, F, G, larve seen from the side, as semi-
transparent objects, illustrating the mode of fixation, the revolution, formation of the atrial chamber and of the
cephalic stalk.

We assume that half embryos of this nature occurred frequently in the ar-
thropod ancestors of the echinoderms; that they were capable of an organic re-
adjustment that enabled them to survive, and that they became the prevailing
form. Whatever animals are assumed to be the ancestors of the echinoderms,
it is obvious that half embryos have been produced by them, they have survived,
and they have given rise to a new class of animals.

It is a significant fact for the student of creative evolution that the absence
of growth on one side of an originally bilateral animal, whatever may: have been
the cause of that, inevitably compels the remaining side to assume a new form,
and thus creates, at almost a single stroke, a new class of animals. In other

430 THE CIRRIPEDS, TUNICATES AND ECHINODERMS.

words, a negative character at one point can create a new character at a dif-
ferent point.

Echinoderms and Cirripeds. Summary.

1. The echinoderms are descended from cirriped-like arthropods in which,
as a result of some unknown condition, the absence, or degeneration of organs
on one side of the middle section of the body had become a frequent or fixed
character.

The five half metameres corresponding to the five defective ones, assumed
in consequence, a new architectural arrangement, forming a closed ring with the
segmental organs arranged in radiating lines, instead of a double linear series of
parallel lines. The five half metameres successfully established a new condition
of organic stability, and gave rise to a new kind of body, and a new class of animals;
the bilaterally symmetrical head and tail ends of the old body either atrophied
completely, or were reduced to structural insignificance.

2. The relation of the echinoderms to the arthropods is shown by the absence,
or imperfect repetition of a true gastrula stage; by the conspicuous development
of a telopore and teloccele; by the development of a nauplius-like larval form, or
naupula; and by the mode of development of the mesoderm, mesoblastic somites,
coelom, and excretory ducts.

3. The echinoderms more particularly resemble the cirripeds in the form
of the larve, and in their mode of attachment and rotation; also in the mode of
growth of the mantle, atrial chamber, appendages, and cephalic stalk; and in the
peculiar sessile mode of life that is so characteristic of practically all the more
primitive members of the class.

CHAPTER XXIII.

THE ENTEROPNEUSTA, PTEROBRANCHIA, POLYZOA, BRACHIO-
PODA, PHORONIDA AND CHA'TOGNATHA.

IV. THE ENTEROPNEUSTA. (FIGS. 296, 297, 298.)

The resemblance between the larve of the enteropneusta and echinoderms
has been frequently emphasized, and it is generally assumed that it indicates a
common origin for both classes in some worm-like ancestors. We shall show that
the resemblance between these larve is largely superficial; that between them there
are underlying differences, so great as to preclude a direct genetic relation of one
to the other, and that neither one nor the other resembles the larva of annelids.

The enteropneusta have also been compared with the vertebrates, because of
their aboral nerve cord, perforated gill sacs, “enteric” coelom, and “notochord.”
The first two points are of real significance, and together with other evidence,
indicate an intimate relation with Amphioxus, tunicates, and other acraniates, but
not with vertebrates. The last two points, the “enteric ccelom” and “‘notochord”’
have a purely artificial value that has been created by a false interpretation of the
early processes of development, for the ‘“‘archenteron”’ and the “gastrula” that
lie at the bottom of the whole system, have no existence.

The Enteropneusta and the Echinoderms.—The early development of the
enteropneusta is very significant. We have already seen that when the gastrula is
retained in an essentially unmodified condition, and has the significance originally
attached to it, it always gives rise to the endoderm only, its cavity remains as the
cavity of the enteron, and its external opening remains as the neurostoma; or the
latter is formed at the point where the gastrula opening, or blastopore, closed.
These conditions prevail in the annelids and molluscs. Wherever the two inner
germ layers arise from a caudal infolding that gives rise to both mesoderm and
endoderm, to mesoccele and endoccele, and that in closing gives rise to the anus, not
to the mouth, we are dealing with a highly modified process of development that is
only remotely comparable with gastrulation, and the presence of which is prima
facie evidence that the animals in which it occurs are descended from arthropod
ancestors.

It is the latter type of development that is characteristic of the enteropneusta,
hence it is apparent at the very outset that their simple structure is not a primitive
condition but a secondary one, and that the location of the functional mouth on
the hemal, instead of the neural surface, the formation of an ento-mesoccele in
place of a gastrula, and the presence of a telopore in place of a blastopore, de-
finitely excludes the enteropneusta from both the molluscs and annelids, and
places them among the descendants of the arthropods.

431

432 THE ENTEROPNEUSTA.

With these facts in mind, if we compare an echinoderm larva with that of
Balanoglossus, it will be seen that the resemblances between them in general form,
and in the arrangement of the ciliated bands, are not of special significance; or at
least they can be explained on the assumption that both echinoderms and entero-
pneusta are descended from arthropods, and that their larval forms are similarly
adapted to a temporary pelagic existence.

The differences are more fundamental, for in the echinoderm the mouth lies
on the primitive neural surface and is still surrounded by the nerve cord, or a rem-
nant of it. Although the larval mouth of the echinoderms is said, in some cases,
to disappear, or to close for a time, it opens again, or a new one is formed very
close to where the old one was last seen. There are no indications that the per-
manent mouth of the echinoderms is a hemostoma, and there are no indications
that a functionless remnant of a neurostoma is present. In the enteropneusta
the case is different. ‘The permanent mouth lies on the hemal surface, and out-
side of the medullary plate; it cannot, therefore, be compared with the functional
mouth of the echinoderms, annelids, molluscs, or arthropods. Moreover, in
the enteropneusta there are definite indications of a primitive infolding of the
neural surface that perforates the medullary plate where the primitive mouth should
be located. This opening is not comparable with the hydropore, because it lies on
the neural side, not the hemal. It is, however, comparable in position and de-
velopment with the neurostoma of annelids and arthropods, and probably repre-
sents the subneural gland of the tunicates, and the infundibular tube of true verte-
brates. (Compare Figs. 43, 44, 284-297.)

The Enteropneusta and the Arthropods.—The enteropneusta are prob-
ably descendants of primitive arthropods in which the essential features of the class
were definitely developed. Through one of those inexplicable internal condi-
tions that are exemplified in other sub-phyla of the acraniates, the enteropneusta
have failed to develop to their full extent many of the characteristic structures of
segmented animals. The power of growth is vigorous enough, for the dwarfed
forms of other phyla do not occur here, but the power of organic definition is
feeble, producing animals without conspicuous appendages, or outgrowths of any
kind, and without a sharp definition or specialization of the organs ordinarily
segmentally arranged, such as neuromeres, myotomes, sense organs and ccelomic
chambers. We have frequently seen this condition in the abnormal embryos of
Limulus, where certain individuals appear, as it were, to have passed through a
flame that softened or partly melted the usual surface details (Fig. 184), or that
reduced a whole group of metameres to a single appendage, or to an ill-defined
unspecialized mass of cells. (Fig. 186.) A somewhat similar condition is familiar
enough in the maggot-like larvee of many insects and arachnids, and especially
in those forms where these conditions become more and more accentuated in the
later stages, as in Pentastoma, and in innumerable parasitic crustacea.

The initial factor in these cases is, no doubt, a defective germinal structure
that determines the character of the older stages and rigidly prescribes the mode

STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT. 433

of life for the adult. These germinal defects are manifestly cumulative in their
results for, as a rule, only the older stages are so modified by them that practically
all traces of the initial organs are obliterated. The adult parasitic crustacean
with its worm-like body, devoid of metameres and appendages, and with sense
organs, nerves, muscles, heart, mouth, and alimentary organs either imperfectly
developed, or altogether absent, could not have been recognized as arthropods,
with highly specialized ancestors, if it were not for the absolutely conclusive testi-
mony of the embryonic and larval stages.

In the enteropneusta we have a precisely similar condition, except that the
particular form of reduction characteristic of these animals is not dependent for
its perpetuation upon a parasitic mode of life; and the loss of organic definition
extends farther back into the ontogeny, modifying and disguising the embryonic
and larval stages, almost as effectually as it does the later ones. Nevertheless,
certain characteristic conditions have been retained that demonstrate with reason-
able certainty that the enteropneusta are descended from arthropod stock.

Structure and Development.—The cleavage is total and the resulting
blastomeres are of remarkably uniform size. A deep infolding is formed at the
caudal end, representing a typical teloccele, or mesentoccele. The telopore soon
closes, but opens again as the anus, or the anus forms at the point where the
telopore closes. (Fig. 270, A.C.)

The Gastrula and the Telocele—At a very early stage a large portion of the
inner tube is constricted off, and a funnel-shaped outgrowth extends from it
toward the anterior neural surface, where a median ectodermal infolding is formed
that unites with it, putting the inner chamber into communication with the
exterior.

The history of the important events that take place at this point is by no
means clear or conclusive. The early opening in the median neural surface of
the proboscis has been called the proboscis pore and has been compared with the
hydropore of echinoderms, but the difference in their location is apparently
irreconcilable, one being on the hzmal side and the other on the midneural side.
Moreover, the primitive proboscis pore does not appear to be the same thing as
either the single unsymmetrical proboscis pore, or the two pores that may be
present in the adult.

A more satisfactory explanation may be given, it seems to me, and is as fol-
lows: The anterior section of the inner tube represents the remnants of the gas-
trula, and consists of the primitive cephalic mesoderm and endoderm, at first
united with the walls of the teloccele, later separating from them as the so-called
“proboscis ccelom.” (Fig. 270, g.) The point of union with the procephalic lobes
represents the remnants of the blastopore, and the coincident ectodermic infolding,
the neurostoma, and primitive stomodeum, .st. The latter closes and loses its
connection with the cephalic endoderm, but leaves for some time a faint central
depression that marks its original location. (Fig. 296, 2.st). The definitive
proboscis pores arise later, close to the neurostoma, and open into the proboscis

28

434 THE ENTEROPNEUSTA.

cavity or cavities, which may now be regarded as the definitive coelomic cavities
of the procephalon. (Figs. 296 and 297.)

The Mesoderm and Celom.—lIt is clear that the primitive proboscis ccelom,
or cephalic vesicle, is not comparable with the paired ccelomic vesicles of the
collar and trunk, for the cephalic vesicle arises at a very much earlier period; it
consists of a special type of rounded cells not seen elsewhere, and from them arise
the first mesenchyme. It is unpaired, located on the neural side of the head and
widely separated from the coelomic vesicles of the trunk. The latter are paired,
have a posterior lateral position, are thin walled, and arise either as evaginations,
or as solid outgrowths of the teloccele wall, or as segments of mesodermic bands
of teloblastic origin.

The cells forming the primitive proboscis vesicle (Fig. 270, B.), are comparable
with those that in arachnids (Fig. 141, ac.) arise from the inward proliferation of
the anterior primitive cumulus, or with those formed in the region of the cephalic

Fic. 296.—Diagrams to illustrate the larval development and metamorphosis of Balanoglossus.

lobes in insects. In both cases, and this condition prevails no doubt in many
other arthropods, two distinct infoldings or solid ingrowths are formed, the anterior
or cephalic one representing the gastrula, the posterior, the teloblasts or teloccele.
(Fig. 269.) The anterior one, g, gives rise to a mass of cells at the point where
the stomodzum is forming, or where it will appear later. From them arises the
mesoderm of the procephalic lobes, and the endoderm which either forms the
anterior portion of the enteron, or is scattered through the yolk and degenerates.

The Larva.—The young larva, at about the time of hatching, is covered with
cilia and has somewhat the appearance of that in Fig. 296, B. It may now be
compared with an echinoderm larva, or with a legless, ciliated nauplius. (Fig.
296, A.) The main longitudinal, ciliated band represents, as it does in the echino-
derms, the free margin of the thoracic fold, and the margin of the caudal and pre-
oral lobes. The typical tornaria arises as a result of the contraction and subse-
quent infolding of the anterior hemal surface of the head. We have studied this
process and the partit playsin the formation of the cephalic navel of arachnids, and
in the formation of the mouth and the closing up of the hemal surface of the head
vertebrates. Chapter XIV, p. 253. Here we may again recognize the same process.
The cephalic navel first appears as a thickened depression of the hamal surface, B.

METAMORPHOSIS. 435

An outgrowth of the enteron extends toward, and then unites with it, to form the
hemostoma; meantime the surrounding hemal surface is greatly shortened by the
drawing together of the anterior and posterior ends, the progress of the contraction,
which may be compared with the reversed curvature commonly seen in arthropod
embryos during the formation of the “dorsal organ,” being indicated not only by
the general shape of the larva, but in a specially striking manner by the changes
in the form of the ciliated band, B, C and D.

Metamorphosis.—During the metamorphosis the ciliated bands disappear,
and the larva rapidly takes on the form of the adult. (Fig. 296, Z.) The preoral
region elongates and forms the proboscis, or procephalon, the middle section
forms the collar, or thorax, and the posterior one, the abdomen, or tail.

Cephalic Caecum.—Meantime a median outgrowth, or cephalic cecum,
arises from the anterior end of the enteron, that marks the beginning of the so-
called “notochord” (Fig. 296, EZ.) But neither in structure, nor origin, nor in its
anatomical relations, has it any resemblance to a notochord, for we have seen in

CG hv

Fic. 297.—Diagrams illustrating the structure of Balanoglossus. A, Sagittal section through the procephalon
(proboscis) and mesocephalon (collar, thorax); B, transverse section of the mesocephalon; C, transverse section of
the abdominal, or branchial region.

Chapter XIX, that the notochord is a modification of the middle cord, that it arises
from the ectoderm, and that it is never connected with or forms a part of a func-
tional alimentary canal. It is therefore obvious that an organ cannot be re-
garded as a notochord merely because it is a diverticulum of the gut. In fact, such
an origin or connection may be accepted as conclusive evidence that the organ in
question is not a notochord.

The cephalic caecum of Balanoglossus, in its minute structure and location
is not essentially different from the cecal outgrowths of the foregut which
are so common in arthropods, as for example in cirripeds (Figs. 275 and 277),
entomostraca (Fig. 282, A), phyllopods (Fig. 273), cladocera (Fig. ro), and
arachnids (Fig. 43).

The cephalic cecum of the enteropneusta probably represents the remnants
of that part of the foregut that originally opened into the primitive stomodecum
and neurostoma.

The Late Larval and the Adult Stages —In the later stages the principal events
are: The further differentiation of the main subdivisions of the body, that is, of the
procephalic, thoracic, branchial, and caudal regions; and the development of
the gill slits, lateral folds, endocranium, excretory ducts, and nervous system.

43 6 THE ENTEROPNEUSTA.

The relations of these various parts to one another are shown in a diagram-
matic way in Fig. 297, which represents a sagittal section of the head and thorax,
and in Fig. 298, which represents the entire animal viewed from the neural
surface. At this stage Balanoglossus may be compared to a naked phyllopod-
like arthropod, with the basal portion of its abdominal appendages infolded in
the typical arachnid method to form respiratory sacs,
the distal portion persisting as the tongue bar. The
gill sacs eventually unite with, and then open into,
corresponding cecal outgrowths from the gut, giving
rise to the new type of respiratory organs characteristic
of the vertebrates and of several other phyla of the
acraniates.

New respiratory appendages and branchial clefts
arise in varying numbers behind those already formed,
in the usual manner for segmented animals. The
wing-like lateral folds (Figs. 297 and 208, /.f.), that
are so characteristic of the adults, may be compared
to the pleural folds on the abdominal metameres of
a trilobite, arachnid, or crustacean (Figs. 2, 11), or with
the lateral folds of the trunk in a primitive vertebrate.
(Fig. 232.) In all these cases the pleural folds repre-
sent the extended lateral margins of the neural sur-
face, they lie lateral to the appendages and are turned
in a neural direction. (Fig. 297.)

The Endocranium.—We have seen that the endocra-
nium forms a most characteristic structure in the
arachnids, and in primitive crustacea related to the
phyllopods. In its simplest condition, as in Apus
and Branchipus, it consists of a transverse bar, or
plate of cartilage, lying in the anterior thoracic region,
just back of the neurostoma, and on the hemal side
of the nerve cord. The main body of the endocra-
nium is of mesodermic orgin, and often contains two
kinds of cartilage-like tissues that differ in structure
and in their reaction to stains; one is a dense fibroid
Belarc igr Jags Balano” tissue with small flattened nuclei irregularly distri-
surface, buted; the other has more the appearance of hyaline

cartilage, and contains large rounded cells, in the
peculiar grouping characteristic of certain kinds of primitive cartilage. In a
few cases, notably Apus, paired ectodermic ingrowths are formed, lined internally
with chiten, which unite with and form an integral part of the endocranium.

These facts have an important bearing on the origin of the enteropneusta,
where the endocranium has a similar form and location. Here it is a flattened plate,

MUSCLES. CCELOM. NERVOUS SYSTEM. 437

lying on the hamal side of the cephalic caecum, with two slender arms extending
backward on either side of the pharynx. (Fig. 297, e.c.) The body of the en-
docranium consists of a sharply defined mass, consisting of clear, concentric
“chitenoid” lamella, said to arise from the basement membrane of the cephalic
cecum and the pharynx, and in some cases containing cells lodged between the
lamelle. The lateral portions are less clearly defined and consist of a cartilage-
like matrix, containing small clusters, or nests of cartilage cells, said to be derived
from the epidermis.

Whatever may be the origin of the endocranium in the enteropneusta, it
certainly bears a strong resemblance in its location, form, and histological struc-
ture to the endocranium of the arachnids and phyllopods.

ALuscles.—The arrangement of the muscles in the collar and trunk supports
the interpretation indicated above. We have shown (p. 230) that in the arachnids
practically all the somatic, or intersegmental, muscles are absent in the thorax,
this condition being either the cause or the result of the fusion of all the thoracic
and cephalic tergites into one cephalothoracic shield. ‘The muscles that remain
belong to the appendages, or to the forward extension of longitudinal abdom-
inal muscles that are attached to the posterior portion of the endocranium. There
is, therefore, a marked difference in the arachnids as well as in many other arthro-
pods between the musculature of the thorax and that of the abdomen. According
to Ritter there is in Balanoglossus a similar difference between the musculature
of the collar (thorax) and trunk. He states that circular somatic muscles are
wholly wanting in the collar. Here the principal muscles are radio-longitudinal,
attached to the posterior wall of the collar at one end, and at the other mainly to
the “notochord” and nuchal skeleton, but also to the walls of the cesophagus.
The muscles of the branchial and caudal regions, both longitudinal and circular,
are always strictly somatic.

The Celom consists of three main divisions. (Figs. 279, 298, c.°.) That
in the proboscis, c’, may be regarded as the remnants of the procephalic ccelom,
and is drained by one or two excretory ducts, comparable with the antennary
ducts of crustacea, or the cheliceral ducts of the arachnids (Galeodes). The
collar ccelom, c’, represents that of the thorax, and its excretory duct represents
one of the posterior thoracic ducts, 7.e., the so-called shell gland of the phyllopods
or the coxal gland of the arachnids. The trunk ccelom represents that of the
abdominal and post abdominal segments united to form a continuous chamber,
and is devoid of excretory ducts as it is in the arthropods generally. (Com-
pare with Fig. 279.)

The Nervous System. The Neural and Hemal Cords.—The nervous system
of arthropods forms: 1.A “ventral” medullary plate consisting of parallel, gang-
lionated, segmented cords, perforated by the primitive stomodeum. It coincides
with the primitive axis of growth and differentiation, ontogenetically and phy-
logenetically. It is the primary nervous system because it is the oldest, and
because it is always associated with the oldest sense organs, muscles and append-

438 THE ENTEROPNEUSTA.

ages, which develop side by side with it on the neural surface. It rarely keeps
pace with the growth of the body, usually concentrating at the anterior end,
around, or close to, the stomodeum.

2. The hemal nerve cord is unpaired, never distinctly segmented, and never
associated with important sense organs or appendages. It is the last part of the
nervous system to develop, and is associated most intimately with the heart and the
hemal and somatic musculature, which are the last parts of the embryonic body
to develop. The hemal cord extended primarily from end to end of the trunk
and was united with the neural cord by segmental, circular nerves. It likewise
fails to keep pace with the growth of the body; its point of concentration, however,
is never in the anterior cephalic region, but in the cardiac and respiratory region,
which tends to shift farther and farther back, beyond the oral and thoracic, and
finally into the abdominal region. (See Chapter XII.) Its principal connection
with the neural system is with the stomodeal nerve centers at the head end, and
with the respiratory neuromeres of the abdominal region. But even the former
connection is lost, or greatly reduced in the highest types, leaving only the seg-
mental cardiacs of the vagus and respiratory neuromeres as a means of connect-
ing the main hemal nerve with the nerve cords on the opposite side of the body.
(Limulus).

The principal parts of the nervous system of the enteropneusta correspond
with those of the arachnids as outlined above, the most important point being the
identity of the primary neural surface of the arthropod with the principal neural
surface of the enteropneusta. In the arthropods, it is true, the medullary plate
is on the oral side, while in the enteropneusta it is on the aboral side, but it is the
mouth that has changed, not the neural surface with all its fundamental relations.
The hemal mouth is a new formation, while the old mouth may still be recog-
nized in its proper place in the median depression of the cephalic lobes. (Fig.
297, n.st.) The medullary plate of the proboscis represents the remnants of
the supra-cesophageal ganglion, and is still connected with the small eye spot, ac.,
which probably represents the remnants of a parietal eye. (Figs. 296-208.)

The thoracic neuromeres form the principal part of the nervous system,
and at an early period are bodily infolded to form the floor of a canal or tube.
The latter usually remains open at either end, and a variable number of vertical
canals, or strands of tissue, persist over the median line and appear to mark the
point where the medullary folds are imperfectly united (Figs. 296, 297, iv.),
recalling the vertical strands of ectoderm between the compacted thoracic neu-
romeres in the insects and arachnids. (Figs. 221, 229 and 231.)

In cross sections the thoracic or collar neuromeres form a thick band of small
nerve cells with an underlying layer of “punct substanz.”” The general appear-
ance of the cord is similar to that of a young scorpion, the more so since the nerve
cells, for a time, may be arranged in radiating lines around minute cavities (Har-
rimania, Ritter) like those so characteristic of the embryonic cords of the arach-
nids. (Figs. 15, 16 and 227.)

THE PTEROBRANCHIA. 439

The posterior end of the thoracic nerve cord is united by nerves of consider-
able size with the median hemal nerve (Fig 297, .nc.), the latter representing the
median cardiac nerve of the arachnids. (Compare Figs. 78, 115 and 117.)

V. THE PTEROBRANCHIA. (FIGS. 299, 300.)

The pterobranchia have been shown to have a structure so much like that of
the enteropneusta in respect to the location of the functional mouth, medullary
plate, gill pouches, cephalic cecum, ccelomic chambers, and excretory ducts,
that the fundamental features in the morphology of both groups must be, with-
out doubt, interpreted in the same manner. If this is done, then it is apparent

Fic. 299.—Diagrams of Cephalodiscus. A, Neural surface; B, side view, in optical section.

that the features which are more specially characteristic of the pterobranchia,
such as the six pairs of appendages, the short, branchial region, the U-shaped
intestine with the anal end bent toward the posterior neural surface, and with
the genital ducts opening in the neural surface of the branchial region, give
a decidedly arachnoid character to the adults, and strengthen and confirm
the interpretation we have given for the enteropneusta.

Cephalodiscus may therefore be regarded as a naked arthropod-like animal
with a closed neurostoma, the location of which is indicated by the pit in the ante-
rior portion of the neural plate (Fig. 299, .st.), and by the cephalic cecum, di,
that probably united the primitive stomodeum with the enteron. The cephalic
disc with its procephalon, thoracic appendages, and thoracic neuromeres, m.0.,
represents the cephalothorax; the excretory ducts, opening to the exterior by the
proboscis pores and collar pores, p. p. and c. p., represent respectively the cephalic
and thoracic ducts of arthropods; and the single pair of gill sacs, g.p., represent a

440 POLYZOA.

pair of invaginated respiratory appendages of the vagus region. The genital
organs and ducts have approximately the same location as in many arachnids
and crustacea, that is, just behind the vagus region.

The thoracic appendages of Cephalodiscus develop in an approximaiely
regular order, from before backward, like those of arthropods. (Fig 300,C,D.) In
Rhabdopleura, the arms probably represent a single pair of enlarged, antenna-
like cephalic appendages. (Fig. 300, A,B.)

Attachment is effected, as in the tunicates, by a postoral hemal outgrowth
probably representing a special modification of the posterior part of the cephalic
navel. (Figs. 299, 300.)

Fic. 300.—Diagrams of Rhabdopleura, A, Adult, from neural surface; B, from side, in optical section; C, D,
larve of Cephalodiscus, from the neural surface.

It will be recalled that the cephalic navel is a center of convergent growth, and
that the location of the center, and the nature of the events that take place there
is largely dependent on the volume of the yolk sphere and the rate at which the
growing tissues spread over and enclose the hemal surface. The conditions
created at the closing area, where the advancing lines of equal growth and dif-
ferentiation tend to meet and annul one another, may result, at the cephalic end,
in an ingrowing tube, the opening of which becomes the hemastoma, and at the
caudal end, as in the tunicates and Pterobranchia, in a stolon-like outgrowth that
retains an indefinite power of growth and that becomes the seat of successive
generations of new buds.

VI. THe Potyzoa.

The polyzoa likewise may best be interpreted as descendants of primitive
arthropods of the cirriped type. They do not develop a clearly marked metameric

THE ENTOPROCTA. AAI

structure, and they are disguised by the loss of important larval organs, the result of
an extensive degenerative histolysis; but in the structure and development of the
larve and in their attachment and metamorphosis, indications of arthropod affini-
ties may be recognized.

The entoprocta have undergone the least modification, and one of them,
Pedicellina, will best serve to illustrate the salient characters of the group.

The young, as in so many other acraniates, undergo the earlier stages of
development within the brood pouches of the atrial or vestibular chamber. There
is a total and nearly equal cleavage, and the flattened, hollow blastula is infolded

Fic. 301.—Development of an endoproctous polyzoan (Pedicellina). A—D, Formation of the teloccele, and the
early larval, or naupula, stages; E~G, mode of attachment, and metamorphosis; H-I, early and late larval stage,
seen from the neural surface. The most significant features are the absence of a true gastrula; the conspicuous
mantle, its formation of a vestibular, or atrial, chamber that encloses the appendages and the whole neural surface
of the body; the attachment of the larva by means of a large cephalic stalk; the rotation; and the degeneration
of the prosencephalon, Semi-diagrammatic. (In part aftez Hatscheck, Harmer, and Barrois.)

at the caudal end to forma teloceele. (Fig. 301, A.) The telopore closes and an
independent ectodermic infolding at the head end unites with the enteron, forming
the primitive stomodzeum and neurostoma, v.st. A typical gastrula stage, anda
blastopore, therefore, does not occur. The larva is a naupula, not a trochosphere,
as shown by the prominent labrum, by the longitudinal ciliated band represent-
ing the thickened margin of a branchial fold, and by the teloccelic method of
forming the germ layers. The enteron is U-shaped, with the concave side turned
toward the neural surface. There is a conspicuous apical disc, d, and a large
preoral ganglion, or forebrain, that is probably united by circumoral commissures
with the rudiments of a ventral nerve cord. The latter appears as two thicken-

442 THE POLYZOA.

ings separated by a deep infolding, one next the anterior wall of the stomodzeum,
the other in front of the rectum, t.g. The two ganglia may be regarded as
representing the postoral and the anal group of ganglia of the nauplius.
(Fig. 272.)

On either side of the stomodzeum is an excretory duct (Fig. 301, H. /. c.d.),
that corresponds approximately with the cephalic excretory duct of the nauplius.
The genital cells and genital ducts appear to arise from the deep infolding between
the postoral and postanal ganglia, in a position, therefore, that corresponds to
the location of the same organs in the nauplius, in Cephalodiscus, and in the adult
stages of many arachnids.

The early development of the relatively large brain and nerve cord definitely
locates the primitive neural surface, and gives us the necessary data for the proper
orientation of the larva. The latter comes to rest in the typical naupula fashion,
neural side down. (Fig. 300,#.) A large cephalic outgrowth is then formed, and
as it elongates, it straightens out and lifts up the body, which meantime turns a
half somersault, bringing its neural surface uppermost. The edges of the pleural
folds, about the time of attachment, unite to form a closed vestibule, or atrial
chamber, at. c, within which the appendages make their appearance, F. During
the revolution of the larva, they elongate, rupture the vestibule, and finally pro-
trude from it in the same manner as the legs of a cirriped, or the arms of a young
crinoid. (Figs. 274, 295.)

During the early stages of revolution, the brain and apical disc separate from
the ectoderm and break up into a mass of loose cells that nearly fill the cavity of
the cephalic stalk. (Fig. 301, F.) They appear to increase in numbers and to
receive accessions from other sources. The anterior wall of the enteron, or vesti-
bule according to Harmer, then breaks down, and its walls, surrounding an ill
defined space, merge with the degenerating cells in the stalk. Later some of the
cells undergo still further degeneration, whether by being bodily enclosed in the
cavity of the enteron as seems probable, or not, does not appear. In either case
the rupture in the walls of the enteron closes over and the amorphous mass of
degenerating cells decreases in volume. Some cells appear to persist in the
stalk as star-shaped, connective tissue cells.

The point that appears to be clearly established is the disappearance of the
forebrain and apical disc by a process of histolysis, that seems also to affect other
adjacent tissues, including the anterior wall of the enteron. The fate of the free
cells thus produced is not clear. It is obvious that the whole process, even in the
way it affects the forebrain and apical plate, is very similar to those which occur
on the hemal surface of the thorax, and in the cephalic navel, or dorsal organ, of
cirripeds and parasitic copepods, and it occurs in a corresponding region, that is,
on the anterior hemal surface of the head, at the point where attachment takes
place. (Figs. 274, 282, 283.)

It will be recalled that the cephalic navel of arthropods is an area on the
anterior hemal surface of the cephalothorax, where extensive degeneration of -

THE ECTOPROCTA. 443

embryonic tissues takes place. The degenerating cells are derived from two
principal sources, the hemal blastoderm and the hemal musculature of the anterior
part of the thorax. They concentrate at a definite point on the hemal surface of
the head, where they are invaginated en masse into the yolk, and thence into the
enteron where they are absorbed.

The hemal blastoderm cells are always invaginated into the yolk and ab-
sorbed. The degenerating lateral plate cells of the thorax certainly do not, as a
rule, undergo this fate, although it is difficult at times to distinguish between
them and those derived from the hemal blastoderm. The vast majority of them
either degenerate in situ, become free blood-corpuscle-like cells, or regenerate into
scattered muscle cells. See Chapter XITI, p. 230.

The cephalic navel of arthropods is regarded as furnishing the initial condi-
tions that lead to the formation of a hemostoma. Pedicellina is the only case

Fic. 302.—Larve of polyzoa in the naupula stage, illustrating the degenerative, or pauperitic development
of the first generation. <A, Pedicellina; B, Cyphonautes; C, Lepralia; D-E, Ctenostomide; F, Bugula. (After
Barrois, Prouho, and Harmer, slightly modified. Semi-diagrammatic.

known to me where the seat of degeneration appears to be in temporary communi-
cation with a definitely formed enteron.

Conclusion.—The main features in the structure and development of the
entoprocta agree with those of primitive arthropods, and not with those of the
molluscs, or annelids, or with any other worm-like animals. In place of the
gastrula, blastopore, and trochosphere that are typical of annelids, we have the
teloccele, telopore, and naupula that are typical of the arthropods.

The larva resembles that of cirripeds, in passing its early stages of develop-
ment within a brood pouch; in its subsequent mode of attachment and rotation;
in the mode of growth of its cephalic stalk and mantle, and in the histolytic
changes in the region of the cephalic navel; and in the location of the genital cells
and principal ganglia.

The Ectoprocta.—The ectoprocta may be regarded as modified derivatives
of the more primitive entoprocta. They present an extraordinary diversity of

444 THE POLYZOA.

larval forms, methods of metamorphosis, egg formation, budding, and degenera-
tion. It is not our purpose to discuss these interesting but exceedingly intricate
processes; we merely wish to point out what we consider to be the chief morpho-
logical features of this particular division of the acraniates.

One of the controlling factors in the morphology of the ectoprocta is an ex-
treme exaggeration of those initial defects in germinal material that have been
observed in all the acraniates. The result is that the first generation of zoids are,
at the very ovtset, unusually deficient in the various organs that are normally pres-
ent at those periods. These defective embryos fail to develop beyond the larval
stages, as practically all their organs undergo degenerative histolysis. After the
attachment, practically nothing is left of the original larva but a shapeless sac filled
with a mass of indifferent cells. A second factor in their morphology is that a new
generation of zoids arises from a bud-like infolding on the hemal surface of the
first larva. ‘This new product is not to be regarded as the completion of the
development of the first zoid, but as a
new zoid, representing a second genera-
tion that arises from the formless rem-
nants of the first. But while the first
generation of larve conform in the main,
as far as they go, with the larve of the
entoprocta, the second generation de-
velop into a new type, due to the fact that
its primary, or oro-anal axis, is bent
double, in exactly the opposite direction
from that in the entoprocta. That is,
in the ectoprocta the body is bent so as
to bring the caudal end to a point just in

= scr Sm ERS a Sar el Oi Sac front of the head instead of behind it,
elongating and making convex the
primitive neural surface, and greatly shortening the hemal surface, thus
reversing the conditions in the entoprocta. (Compare Figs. 301 and 303.)
In the ectoprocta, the resulting elongation of the body is therefore in a heemo-neu-
ral direction, and it appears to be brought about in the same manner as in Phoronis
(Fig. 305), by the evagination of the middle section of the enteron through the
space between the divergent, postoral nerve cords. The latter, owing to the very
unequal growth of the hemal and neural surfaces, appear to be transferred to the
hemal surface, but in reality undergo but little change of position. The primitive,
preoral ganglion, or forebrain, apparently fails to develop, or it subsequently atro-
phies, as in the entoprocta and phoronida. Consequently the so-called circum-
oral nerve ring of the ectoprocta does not represent the original nerve ring connect-
ing the pre- and postoral ganglia, but the ventral cords and their transverse com-
missures. (Fig. 303, B.)
The lophophore on this interpretation may be regarded either as a single pair

THE BRACHIOPODS. 445

of greatly enlarged cirrate appendages, comparable with those of brachiopods,
or as the laterally extended row of many minute appendages.

It will also be observed that the entoprocta are attached by stalk-like out-
growths from the hemal surface of the head, in typical acraniate fashion (Fig.
301, J), while the adult ectoprocta of the second generation, like Phoronis, are
attached by the evaginated neural surface. (Fig. 303, A.)

VII. THE BRACHIOPODS.

Our knowledge of the development of the brachiopods is fragmentary and
the data we do possess are lacking in detail and precision. The evidence, so far
as it goes, indicates that the brachiopods belong with the acraniates and that
their structure is best interpreted as a modification of the arthropod type. In
fact, they appear to have retained some of the characteristic features of the cirri-
peds in a less modified form than any other group of acraniates, while their own
distinctive features constitute a natural transition to the condition realized in the

>
>
Per)
ar
td

Ayaan

de

re

stir
ae
ten,

Fic. 304.—Diagrams of a brachiopod. A, Seen in optical section; B, from the neural surface.

phoronida and polyzoa. As in cirripeds, the eggs pass through their early stages
of development, in some cases the whole larval development (Stringocephalus,
Zittel) in brood pouches formed by folds in the mantle chamber.

Cleavage is total and almost equal, giving rise to a hollow blastula that is in-
folded to form a teloccele. The telopore closes, the mesoderm separates from the
entoderm as two coelomic chambers, and the body is divided by two transverse
constrictions into what appear to represent the cephalic, thoracic, and abdominal
regions.

The details of the method of attachment and of the subsequent metamorphosis:
are not clearly understood, but they appear to be essentially the same as in Pedicel-
lina. A hemal outgrowth serves for the permanent attachment of the larva and
a voluminous mantle fold encloses the body in a typical atrial chamber. The
mantle secretes a thick shell, resembling in its somewhat complex minute structure,
the simpler forms of the mantle skeleton in the cirripeds.

The two valves are usually spoken of as dorsal and ventral, but morpholog-

446 THE PHORONIDA.

ically they are better designated as either cephalic and caudal, or anterior and
posterior, corresponding approximately with the rostrum and carina of the
cirripeds. .

The stomodeum arises at a comparatively late period and is without doub
formed on the primitive neural surface, as indicated by the location of the nerve
ring itself and by the position of the simple sac-like heart on the opposite side of
the enteron, h.

The genital cells are located in the walls of the mantle, one pair in the cephalic,
g.o.*, the other, g.o.’, in the caudal lobe, recalling the arrangement of ovaries and
testis in the cirripeds.

The nervous system, in spite of the relatively large size of the animals, is
rudimentary in the extreme, the central portion consisting of a slender circumoral
ring with a small, postoral ganglion.

The forebrain, considered as a nerve center, may be regarded as practically
absent, since the preoral portion of the ring consists of little more than a slender
commissure. The fact is significant, in view of the absence of the preoral ganglion
in the polyzoa and phoronida owing to its histolytic degeneration during the
metamorphosis, and in view of the extremely rudimentary condition of the fore-
brain in all other members of the acraniates.

VIII. THe PHORONIDA.

In the ectoprocta we can only infer from the condition that obtains in the
adult, that the metamorphosis of the second generation of zoids takes place in the
manner described above, for the embryonic processes by which this result is
‘attained are not clearly defined. In the phoronida, however, where the adult
condition is apparently very similar to that in the ectoprocta, the successive steps
in the metamorphosis of the larve are sharply differentiated and are sufficiently
well known to supply this deficiency.

The eggs are nearly yolk free and undergo the early stages of development in
the recesses of the lophophore. The cleavage is nearly equal, forming a hollow,
nearly spherical blastula that is infolded at one side to form, apparently, a nearly
typical gastrula (Fig. 305, A), the blastopore remaining open as the mouth, and the
infolded cells forming the permanent enteron. The latter extends in a caudal
direction, the anus forming at the point where it unites with the ectoderm. The
mesoderm arises as isolated cells at various points from the walls of the blasto-
derm and especially in the vicinity of the anus. It is, apparently, not formed in
conjunction with the endoderm, nor does it separate from the later as definitely
formed ccelomic chambers.

There is a prominent apical plate, a.pl., that probably represents the begin-
ning of the forebrain, or supra-cesophageal ganglion.

A thick, longitudinal band, ad, is formed at an early period, that contains

THE FUSIFORM CELLS. 447

the anlagen of the larval appendages and probably such portions of the postoral
nerve cords as are represented.

The preoral lobe corresponds roughly to the labrum and procephalon, and
the region covered by the diagonal ciliated band, to the thorax of the naupula.
The abdominal region, as in the ectoprocta, is represented by an imaginal disc-like
infolding that grows, in a measure, independently of the rest of the larva, C, ab.
After a while, the thickened floor of the infolding, that has become irregularly
folded, ruptures its amnion-like covering, and is violently everted, carrying a
U-shaped fold of the enteron with it. Meantime the anal end of the larva is
drawn in a hemal direction, the diagonal band ruptures, the forebrain, preoral

Fic. 305.—Diagrams illustrating the development and metamorphosis of Phoronis. (In part, after Selys-
Longschamps.)

and marginal lobes break down, and the fragments pass into the enteron through
the mouth. The short permanent appendages, which are lined with a prolongation
of the coelomic epithelium, assemble in the oral region, forming the basis for the
lophophore.

The primitive cerebral ganglion, or forebrain, disappears with the preoral
lobe, and the permanent ganglia appear to be derivatives of the ventral cords,
transferred to the hemal surface with the permanent appendages. As in the
ectoprocta, these ganglia are connected with each other by a circumcesophageal
band that probably represents the remnants of the transverse commissures, which
have been greatly elongated by the hemal migration of their appropriate ganglia.

Fusiform Cells.—At about the close of the metamorphosis, many peculiar
spindle, or fusiform cells make their appearance, that probably represent the rem-
nants of the disintegrating, or the unformed, thoracic musculature. In their
histological structure, general appearance and distribution, they agree closely
with the fiber cells of Limulus and of many other arthropods. See Chapter
XIII, p. 232.

In Phoronis, they are mingled with the vaso-peritoneal tissue, or float freely
in the cavity of the body. They have been regarded as modified blood cells, but

448 THE CH &TOGNATHA.

their origin and fate has not been definitely determined. According to Selys
Longchamp, they have a distinct longitudinal, usually spiral striation, and ap-
parently a small eccentric nucleus. When alive they are flexible, but become
hard and brittle when fixed. ‘Their color and appearance is suggestive of mus-
cular substance. Similar cells occur in Lingula (Yatsu) and are said to occur also
in the annelids (Nereis). Their significance in the annelids is not apparent. In
the arthropods they are associated with special forms of muscle building and with
muscle degeneration. ‘They are significant in the acraniates (phoronida and
polyzoa), for they are indicative of the occurrence of extensive muscular degenera-
tion, and of the secondary character of the anatomical structure of these animals.

Selys Longchamp figures a deep infolding that is formed in the middle of
the hemal surface at the close of metamorphosis. It is not described in detail,
but it appears to be the seat of extensive degeneration, similar to that in the
cephalic navel or ‘dorsal organ’ of arthropods. (Fig. 305, G, c.nv.)

IX. THe CHAETOGNATHA.

The chetognatha are clearly to be regarded as the modified descendants of
primitive arthropods, for they retain, even in the adult stages, some of the more
important characters of that group. The head (Fig. 306, A. B.), with its rudimen-
tary appendages, mantle (prepuce), and organs of special sense, represents the
modified remnants of the nauplius; while the trunk, which is a voluminous but
very simple caudal outgrowth from it, represents the imperfectly developed tho-
racic and abdominal tagmata, J, Brc.,andab. ‘They show no recognizable divis-
ion into metameres, and are used mainly for locomotion and for the retention of
sexual cells. There is no distinct larval stage, no period of fixation, and no
striking metamorphosis; the adult is to be regarded merely as a sexually mature
naupula adapted for, and leading throughout its whole life, a pelagic existence.

Development.—The eggs are relatively large (2 mm. in Sagitta), transparent,
and contain a considerable amount of yolk. They are discharged in the early
morning, and develop very rapidly, the young escaping from the egg membranes
between 6 and 8 o’clock on the evening of the same day. Cleavage is total and
nearly equal, resulting in the formation of a spherical blastula with a small cleav-
age cavity. The so-called ‘“‘gastrula”’ is in reality a typical teloccele, and is formed
at the caudal end by the infolding of the teloblasts and primitive germ cells. Two
primitive sexual cells may be recognized at an extremely early stage on the posterior
neural surface of the blastula, D, g, in a position that corresponds with their early
location in many different arthropod embryos. (Lernza, hymenoptera, coleop-
tera, etc.)

The apical infolding carries with it the mesentoblasts and germ cells, the latter
finally lying at the anterior extremity of the teloccele, Z. With the closure of the
telopore, which appears to take place on the posterior, neural surface of the embryo,
the mesoderm, endoderm, and germ cells begin to separate from one another.
The endoderm forms the walls of the primitive gut, Fen, and the mesoderm forms

THE CH#TOGNATHA. 449

sac-like diverticula on either side, m.s. In the next stage, G, the mesoderm has
divided into two pairs of mesodermic chambers, one for the head, c.m.s., and one
for the trunk, th.ms. The anterior end of the primitive gut unites with an ecto-
dermic infolding at the cephalic apex, that gives rise to the mouth and stomodeum,
n.s.t.; the posterior end extends backward and ultimately unites with the caudal
apex at the point where the anus is formed later. Meantime the two primitive
germ cells have divided into four cells, two on either side of the free end of the
enteron. The two anterior ones are the anlagen of the ovaries, ov.,and the two
posterior ones of the testis, ¢.

In the next stage, H, the mesocceles break down, the mesoderm forms a practi-
cally solid mass, and the post-anal section of the body develops. During the early
cleavage stages, a large nucleus appears in association with the cells that give rise
to the mesoblasts and germ cells, C,x. Later it is transferred to the primitive
germ cells, and finally breaks up into fragments and disappears. It appears to
represent the “yolk nuclei” so characteristic of arthropod eggs containing a large
amount of yolk.

In the newly hatched young, J, three regions may be recognized, the head,
Py.c., consisting of what appear to represent the rudiments of one, possibly three
pairs of appendages. It is partly enclosed by two lateral folds, mt.t, that may be
regarded as the remnants of a bivalve shell of the naupula.

The trunk, Br.c., contains very large, paired ventral ganglia, m.br., and the
ovaries, ov. A membranous partition separates the trunk from the caudal region,
a.b., in which are located the testes, #.

The three divisions of the body indicated at this early period are not com-
parable with metameres; they represent three tagmas, or three imperfectly devel-
oped body regions, head, thorax, and abdomen, such as are commonly seen in many
primitive arthropods, or in the embryonic stages of the more highly developed
forms. In the chetognatha, either these regions have never been definitely divided
into metameres, or if so, the metameres have disappeared through the regressive
or degenerative processes that are so prevalent in the acraniates.

The Adult.—The newly hatched young, without any strongly marked larval
stage, pass directly into the adult form. The most noteworthy fact in their devel-
opment is the relatively enormous size of the ventral ganglion in the younger, as
compared with the older stages, indicating a certain amount of degeneration in
the history of the group.

The integument may be very thick and surprisingly complex for animals of
such a low grade of development. It consists, in some genera, of a complicated
irregular network of interlacing trabecule, recalling the vacuolated or cancellous
ectoderm of the cirripeds, branchiopods, and tunicates.

Excretory organs are not definitely known to occur, although the ducts opening
near the base of the mandibles, d, may be connected with such organs. They are
regarded by Moltchanoff as the nephridia-like ducts of the first metamere.

There is no heart, and no circulatory organs, and there are no indications of

29

450 THE CHHTOGNATHA.

a cephalic navel. The body and the alimentary canal are straight, that is, there
is no marked neural or hemal curvature, and no multiplication by budding, agree-
ing in these respects with the cephalochorda and the enteropneusta.

The trunk of the adult is elongated, spindle-shaped, flattened on the neural
and rounded on the hemal surface, with broad pleural, or thoracic folds, of various
forms in different genera. The caudal portion is provided with a telson-like
terminal lobe.

The head of the adult undergoes but little change over that seen in the young
larva, the most conspicuous features being the prepuce-like mantle folds, represent-
ing the bivalve shell of the nauplius, pr, and the pair of large muscular lobes or
mandibular-like appendages, md. They are provided with a group of sensory,
or glandular follicles, fo., and armed with stout movable spines consisting of a
chitenoid material, apparently perforated with typical pore canals and enclosing
a conspicuous pulp cavity. The structure of the follicles and spines gives the
appendages a decidedly arthropod appearance.

The Endocranium.—The mandibles and their spines are moved by power-
ful adductor muscles, in which is imbedded what appears to be a small median
fibroid, or cartilaginous plate, en.c.

It was this plate that Grassi referred to as an organ of unknown significance,
but which might possibly prove to be a “precious jewel” in the eye of the mor-
phologist.

In his description of the muscles in question, he states (p. 42.): “Esso e
dentro V’involucro chitinoide del complesso mediano. Questo musculo, siccome
dissi, ha forma d’arco concavo anteriormente; in un suo-seno, sotto al punto di
massima concavit’ dell’arco, riposa un corpicciolo ovale, appiattito nel senso
dorso-ventrale, fatto di cellule neucleate piuttosto piccole ed a contorni piu or
meno decisi; esso e coperto di fibre muscolari da ogni lato, eccetto il dorsale
e lanteriore, dov’é separato dall’ esofago per l’involucro chitinoide del musculo.
Questo involucro e la musculatura lo separano dalla commissura nervosa boccale.
Ho riscontrato organo in discorso in tutte le specie, eccetto la Claparedi; piu
voluminose sono le specie, piu compare grosso. Per quanto indagassi non riuscii
ad intenderne la significazione fisiologica e morphologica. Posso congetturare
soltanto che si tratti di un organo o nascente o rudimentale, e percio di una pietra,
forse preciosa agli occhi del morphologo.”

The plate in question no doubt represents a small endocranial cartilage, or
sinew, serving for the attachment of the mandibular muscles. It has a special
significance for us because we have seen that a similar cartilage is imbedded in the
mandibular muscles of many primitive arthropods, as in Branchipus, Apus, and
many others, and that it forms the starting point for the cartilaginous endocra-
nium of the higher arthropods and of the vertebrates. See Chapter XVII, p. 312.

Nervous System.—The chetognaths are the only acraniates that retain in the
adult a comparatively large forebrain, with the full equipment of stomodzal
ganglia, nerves and cephalic sense organs, B, f.br.

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 451

It sends nerves to three sets of cephalic sense organs, to the stomodeum,
mantle, and to the oral appendages and their follicles. It is connected with the
ventral ganglion by double circumcesophageal commissures, and probably includes
the rudiments of the primitive forebrain and one or more segments of the dien-

Fic. 306.—Figures illustrating the structure and development of Sagitta. (In part, after Hertwig, Grassi, and
, Epatiewsky.) Semi-diagrammatic,

cephalon. In its general appearance, it resembles the brain of a primitive arthro-
pod more than that of any other invertebrate. This is shown by the internal
arrangement of the commissural fibers, medullary substance, and nerve cells, as
well as by the arrangement of the principal sensory nerves, and the distribution
of the voluminous stomodzal nerves and ganglia. The lateral stomodeal ganglia,

452 CHATOGNATHA.

Lst.g., are more widely separated from the forebrain than in most arthropods,
but otherwise they have a similar relation to the stomodeum and forebrain.
They are united with each other by the same highly characteristic cross com-
missure, s¢.co., that passes over the anterior hemal surface of the stomodeum,
and that forms such an important landmark in the brains of insects, arachnids,
and phyllopods. Moreover the lateral stomodeal ganglia, judging from the
figures of Doncaster, appear to arise, as they do in the arthropods, independently
of the forebrain, from lateral thickenings, or evaginations of the walls of the
stomodeum. See Chapter IV, p. 60.

Cephalic Sense Organs.—The cephalic sense organs consist of two compound
lateral eyes, l.e., a parietal eye, p.e., and the frontal or olfactory organs (‘‘corona
ciliata’), co.c. These important sense organs have the same general arrange-
ment, innervation and structure that is so characteristic of the cephalic sense
organs of all primitive arthropods. Chapter VIII, p. 125.

The lateral eyes, l.e., consist of three retinule, or three small optic cups,
united to form a single organ. The rhabdoms are terminal and nearly upright,
that is they are directed outward toward the optical center of each cup and
toward a centrally located refractive body consisting of three sharply defined
segments These eyes represent the compound lateral eyes of arthropods in a
rudimentary or elementary condition.

The parietal eye (“Fossetta Retrocerebrali” of Grassi), including its two
appendages, is a tri-lobed sac, lying on the posterior median margin of the fore-
brain. Except for the absence of the black pigment that ordinarily makes the
parietal eye so conspicuous, it is very similar to the parietal ocellus of the nauplius
of Apus, Branchipus, or Lernea.

The eye sac consists of a median portion opening freely to the exterior, and
representing the unpaired ocellus with its short epiphysis and pore, while the two
paired ocelli lie in the diverging blind sacs on either side. The globules and
glistening granules described by Grassi, that are contained in these sacs, no doubt
represent the vesicular retinal cells filled with the white pigment so commonly
present in the degenerate parietal eye, e.g., Limulus and Petromyzon. The eye
lies directly on the posterior surface of the brain, as in Apus, and appears to be
connected with it by short but indistinct nerves.

The Olfactory Organ.—Between the parietal and lateral eyes are two large
nerves, co.m., one on either side, that represent the frontal-organ nerves, or the
olfactory nerves of arachnids, phyllopods and entomostraca. They terminate
diffusely, that is, in widely distributed, subcutaneous branches, as is characteristic
of these nerves in the above mentioned forms, in a large sensory area enclosed by
a prominent ciliated groove, “corona ciliata” of Grassi. This area, the surround-
ing ciliated groove, and the appertaining nerves (two pairs ?) represent the frontal
or olfactory organs of the craniata. See Chapter X, p. 160.

The Ventral Ganglion.—The ventral ganglion is relatively large and complex.
Its minute anatomy has not been carefully described, but it appears to have the

CONCLUSION. 453

typical structure of the ventral nerve cord in primitive arthropods. Whether or
no it consists of distinct neuromeres, secondarily united, will probably be mani-
fest on a more careful examination of its transverse commissures.

* * ok * * * ok ok ok

Conclusion.—The chetognatha are unquestionably primitive arthropods,
somewhat degenerate. They are adapted to a permanent pelagic existence and
reach sexual maturity without passing much beyond the nauplius stage. Their
relation to the arthropods is shown by the presence of a typical teloccele; ccelomic
pouches; the early appearance and the location of the sex cells in the segmenting
egg; the division of the body into head, thorax, and abdominal regions; the loca-
tion of the ovaries in the thoracic region, and the testis in the abdominal region of
the adult; the character of the jaws; the lateral or pleural folds; the bivalve mantle
folds of the head (prepuce); the prevalence of chiten; the fibro-cartilaginous plate
in the jaw muscles (endocranium); the structure of the brain and the arrangement
of stomodeal nervous system; and finally the structure and distribution of the
lateral and parietal eyes and “frontal organs.”

The history of the cheetognatha is profoundly significant, for it shows us a
group of animals that combines in a convincing manner some of the important
anatomical characters of adult arthropods, such as those above mentioned, with
the more striking embryonic characters of typical acraniates, such as the telopore
and teloccele and coelomic pouches. Their structure and development justifies
the conclusions already reached in other ways, that the teloccele and ccelomic
pouches are secondary, not primary characters, and that they have been acquired
from arthropod ancestors, partly as a result of degeneration, loss of yolk, and a
consequent rapid process of early development.

The chetognatha resemble the cephalochorda and the enteropneusta in their
straight, elongated body and intestine, but differ from them in the presence of an
open neurostoma and the absence of a hemostoma and gill clefts. They are
definitely excluded from the nematodes, annelids, molluscs, and rotifers—with
which they have been affiliated by various authors—by the absence of the gastrula
and trochosphere stages, by their highly modified development, as well as by the
peculiar structure of their brain, stomodzal ganglia, and cephalic sense organs.
They are clearly acraniates, but are not closely affiliated with any other sub-
division of the group.

CHAPTER NXV.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

We have shown in the preceding chapters that the great trunk line of animal
evolution is the vertebrate-ostracoderm-arthropod-ccelenterate stock. The
recognition of this fact is of great importance, for it enables us correctly to locate
several other important phyla, whose position in a natural system of classification
it has been heretofore impossible to determine. For the first time it opens to us
the great creative period in the evolution of vertebrates; lays before us in detail
the successive stages in the upbuilding of their physical structure and functional
organization; reveals the important factors that create and control the process,
and the critical events incident to its consummation.

This reconstruction of the phylogeny of the animal kingdom adds enormously
to our perspective of evolution, both as to the length of time, and the number and
variety of graded animal forms involved. For the first time it places us in a posi-
tion to study the rate and direction of organic evolution on a grand scale and
to observe in action the forces that direct and control the process, for all the great
systems of organs that find their fullest expression in the vertebrates were in a
nascent condition in the arthropods; here their qualitative material basis, their
relative locations, and their modes of growth were established, and the conditions
were already present that made possible the characteristic structures of man.

This new point of view shows us that the primary creative factors in organic
evolution lie within the organism, and that growth itself not only creates the con-
ditions that produce the framework of living things, but marks out the boundaries
within which organic evolution is possible. External environment, natural selec-
tion, and heredity are of little or no importance in this process. They cannot be
considered as active factors in evolution till after the underlying framework of the
organism has been created.

* k * ok ok * * * *

J. Tor EVoLurION OF A CREATIVE ENVIRONMENT.

Cosmic, Organic, and Social Environments.—It is evident that we may not
consider environment as something apart from and independent of the things
environed, for, as we have seen, the mere process of growth, or of continued being,
literally creates new environments for all the constituent parts, whether we are
dealing with proteids, or protoplasm, or a group of cells, or a vast community, or
society of organisms; and the new environments, likewise, literally create new
structures and new organisms. Structure, organization, and environment there-

454

THE EVOLUTION OF A CREATIVE ENVIRONMENT. 455

fore, are evolved simultaneously and inseparably, and they become more and
more complex, interlocked with one another and with their innumerable constit-
uents, with the lapse of time.

It is important to distinguish, more sharply than is usually done, between the
various kinds of environment, and the parts they play in the production of new
structures and organisms; between the environments that create, and those that
are prohibitory, or exclusive, or merely permissive.

Consider, for example, a simple case, such as ice. There are three essential
factors involved in its production, or creation: 1. The inherent nature of the
hydrogen and oxygen of which it is composed; 2. the relation of the two elements
to each other as to time, space, and quantity, and 3. the conditions as to pressure,
temperature, etc. When all three factors, 7.e., materials, time, space and quan-
tity relations, and environment, are in a definite adjustment, ice appears, or is
produced, or created. Jf some animal, or other agent, devours or destroys the
ice as fast as it is created, or prevents the act of creation, we may add a fourth
factor as essential to the creation or the existence of ice, namely 4. the absence of
an excluding, or destructive agent.

The first and second factors include the materials and their distribution;
the third and fourth are external, and are primarily distinct from the materials
or their distribution; they constitute the environment. Only one factor may be
assumed to be permanent, or at any rate relatively permanent, that which con-
stitutes the quality or nature of the materials, or simply the materials themselves.
All other factors are constantly changing or fluctuating. The second and third
factors may be properly considered creative factors in the sense that when they
prevail, ice, a different thing from what previously existed, appears. In no sense
can ice be said to have been present in, or to have pre-existed in either the ma-
terials, H and O, or in the creative conditions. The fourth class of factors may
be neutral or permissive, exclusive or prohibitory, but under no conditions
creative.

Thus, reduced to its simplest terms, the command of materials and of their
relations to each other as to time, space, and quantity, and the command of
environment, constitute creative power.

All aggregations of material create for the aggregate, and for each of its com-
ponents, new directive and controlling conditions. This is true whether we are
dealing with the aggregation of elements to form water, or proteids, or mixtures of
proteids. The aggregation of cosmic materials to form the earth has produced
new conditions that created the land, and sea, and atmosphere, rivers, mountains,
valleys and soil, and gave to each in turn its power to direct and control, and to
createanew. All vital, organic growth is of this nature, except that its income and
outgo are more accurately balanced and its sphere of activity more minutely
localized.

The geologist interprets the growth of the earth by its change of form and
by the distribution of its materials, and seeks to correlate its structure at a given

456 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

time with the conditions which at that, or some previous time, prevail, convinced

that one is the formal expression of the other. We have used the same method:
in the interpretation of organic growth. We have shown that the mere process o/

radial and apical growth, or the aggregation of organic materials around a given

center, or along a given line, or surface, automatically creates regularly graded

zones of unlike conditions that are coincident with the distribution of unlike

materials or organs We conclude therefrom that the basic structure of plants

and animals is automatically created by the process of growth itself, or that

growth automatically creates special local conditions, which are expressed in the

structures that appear at those points.

The principal factors, therefore, that create organized structures are primarily
internal and are sharply localized; they are the result of the environment of its
several parts, and they change with the process of growth. The medium external
to the organism as a whole, its cosmic environment, such as the sea water and its
contents, pressure, temperature, light, gravity, etc., is practically unaffected by
local growths and remains approximately constant.

Historically speaking then, the evolution of the external environment
did not keep pace with the evolution of the internal environment. Primarily
the external environment was purely inorganic, or cosmic, broadly permissive,
or neutral. In the early stages of organic evolution there was no dependence of
one organism on another, no social organization, no social environment, no or-
ganic competition, or selection, or elimination, for all alike drew their materials
from the surrounding inorganic media.

As primitive organisms became more complex, the balancing points of internal
environments became more precisely located, and were expressed in more stable,
more sharply defined differences in the structure of the resulting forms. The
growth of individual organisms was accelerated, or short circuited by the fusion,
or union, or absorption, of one form by another, giving simultaneous rise to organic
nutrition, sexual reproduction, social environment, and social competition.

Thus we again reach the conclusion that the continual aggregation of like
units to form a homogeneous whole is an impossibility, for aggregation creates un-
like conditions, that create new things, new organs, new organisms, new societies,
and new organizations of old societies.

II. Crises IN ORGANIC EVOLUTION.

The evolution of organisms does not proceed at a uniform rate, but at a
variable one; now slow, now fast, retreating, diverging, advancing; now by in-
numerable minute steps, now by leaps and bounds; because the ever shifting
relations of part to part, organ to individual, and individual to society, are of
unlike nature and of unequal value.

These inequalities in the potential value of organic readjustments form the
true basis of a natural system of classification. ‘They create the critical periods
in organic evolution; they produce actual gaps in the mosaic of adult forms which

CRISES IN ORGANIC EVOLUTION. 457

constitutes the ideal genealogical tree of the animal kingdom; their advents create
the real subdivisions, and mark the starting points of divergent evolution for
phyla, classes, and for the innumerable smaller branches. The gaps in a natural
system of classification therefore do not always mark the periods of lost records
or the areas of densest ignorance.

Hence organic readjustments, according to their import, mark the periods of
relatively rapid phyletic changes that are of value in classification. Let us con-
sider some of those organic changes that are recognizably correlated with differ-
ences in bodily form, and that have been instrumental in fixing or guiding the
course of evolution in the arthropod-vertebrate stock.

A. The Evolution of Metamerism and Bilateral Symmetry.—lIt has been
shown that a local exaggeration of radial growth results in apical growth, and that
under the existing conditions apical growth inevitably creates bilateral symmetry
and a double series of graded unlike conditions and structures, one series extend-
ing in a cephalo-caudal direction giving rise to metamerism, the other in a neuro-
hemal direction, giving rise to the graded series of conditions and organs on the
right and left half of each metamere. (See Fig. 157.) These conditions are prob-
ably resident in all coherent, organic growth, for we see essentially the same
conditions repeated wherever apical growth prevails, whether in plants or animals.

It was, no doubt, some local exaggeration of radial growth in a ccelenterate
ancestor that initiated the craniate stock. The craniates began as minute ani-
mals (trocosphere stage) consisting of a relatively large head that was built on a
radiate plan, and that represented the ancestral ccelenterate body. From this
primitive head, a local outgrowth arose that gave rise to a new body. The latter
gradually increased in volume, and as a result of its characteristic mode of apical
growth, bilateral symmetry, metamerism, and the difference between the neural
and hemal surfaces, became gradually and permanently established.

The old body, or primitive head, decreased relatively in volume and was
finally represented almost solely by its nervous elements, the primitive forebrain,
and by the oral opening into the alimentary canal. The new trunk increased in
volume by the spasmodic production of new groups of metameres, alternating
with prolonged periods of phylogenetic inactivity. Each new group of metameres
always differed from the preceding ones, and after a varying period of greater
or less organic independence, was incorporated with them as a subordinate part
of an increasingly complex head. Even in its most elaborate condition, as seen
in the higher vertebrates, the head still shows distinct traces of the successive gen-
erations of metameres of which it is composed.

Each notable increase in the size of the body due to the addition of a new
group of metameres, disturbed the pre-existing organic equilibrium, bringing
about the shifting of the organs of locomotion, excretion, circulation, and digestion,
to regions farther and farther back in the body. Outgrowths of nerve fibers from
the old sensory and nervous centers then established coordinating relations with
them.

458 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

The special characteristics of apical growth in the craniate stock are the precise
limitation to its extent; the sharp differences between the metameres of different
groups, or generations; and the differences between the various parts of the same
metameres. ‘This is specially notable in the arthropods where many of the sub-
phyla, such as the insects, arachnids, etc., are notable for a small, definite number
of metameres, and for the sharply graded step-like differences between them.
This is in marked contrast with the leaf-like, homogeneous body of the platyhel-
menthes; the voluminous and claborate, but short bodied mollusca; the inde-
finitely elongated series of similar metameres characteristic of the annelids; and
finally with the small size, feeble definition of organs, but unlimited power of
budding so commonly manifested by the acraniates.

One of the striking features of apical growth that is manifest through the
entire range of the arthropod-vertebrate stock is the vigorous and persistent
power of producing new metameres that are varied in character, and that have
a well marked power of mutual adaptability. Itis this adaptability that ultimately
leads, especially in the older, more anterior metameres of the higher forms, to the
almost complete disappearance of metamerism, and to the substitution for it of
a linear arrangement of unlike functions and. organs where the location of an
organ in the series is determined by its right of historic precedence and by the
degree to which the performance of its functions depends on location.

* ok ok * * ** * BS *k

On the other hand, the acraniates are universally characterized by the lack
of this vital vigor, and the contrast between the method of growth and differentia-
tion in these two great subdivisions of the animal kingdom is most instructive.
Although the acraniates apparently started at the same time as the craniates,
with a very similar structure, and under similar external conditions they gave
rise to a multiplicity of feeble, defective, often degenerate subphyla, whose most
characteristic features are the degenerate or extremely small size of the neuro-
muscular systems, the feeble power of apical growth, and the indistinct metamer-
ism. We may attribute this lack of organic definition to some inherent defect in
the constituent materials common to them all, and which lies quite beyond our
reach. Another great difference between the two groups is the absence of a fixed
internal environment in the acraniates, due to the absence of an impervious exo-
skeleton. Without it, development is apparently more diffuse, or vegetative, and is
marked by an unlimited power of budding. At the same time there is clearly some
fundamental defect in their neuromuscular system which checks its development, or
leads to its almost complete degeneration.

B. Asymmetry as a Creative Factor.—While bilateral symmetry, with
its accompanying arrangement of unlike parts in linear and transverse series,
is apparently an inherent product of apical growth, and is the normal condition
in the arthropod-vertebrate stock, it is subject to modifications of unknown origin
that produce various degrees of asymmetry. Where there is a measurable quanti-

ASYMMETRY AS A CREATIVE FACTOR. 459

tative difference between corresponding right and left organs, the other parts of
the body promptly respond by a change of form, or position, which tends to restore
the lost equilibrium, producing thereby a more obvious deformity or asymmetry.

It is often assumed that asymmetry is the result of a sessile or parasitic mode of
life. But it is altogether more probable that the reverse is true, for comparatively
few sessile or parasitic animals are asymmetrical, and extremely asymmetrical
forms would be likely to find a sessile or parasitic mode of life the only one open to
them, because these conditions are less exacting.

The initial cause of asymmetry is usually some event that occurs within the
egg itself, probably at a very early period. It has been shown, for example, that
under normal conditions, such an ancient and stable type as Limulus produces a
surprisingly large number of asymmetrical embryos. When one side is entirely
absent, the remaining side is thrown out of its original straight line into the form
of a bow, a half circle, or a semi-spiral. These forms may live several months
and appear to be perfectly healthy, but apparently they never develop beyond
the larval stages.

Extreme asymmetery in the embryonic development of some cirriped-like
arthropod probably initiated the great class of echinoderms, for the echinoderm
larva, which in its structure, metamorphosis, and mode of attachment, resembles
that of a cirriped, is at first quite symmetrical. When the organs onone side
degenerate, or fail to develop, the remaining side bends till its two ends meet and
form a ring; the segmental organs are then arranged along the radii of a circle,
instead of in parallel lines. These changes are similar to those that occur in
Limulus embryos, except that they are carried farther and give rise to animals
capable of surviving in their new form.

Thus such a negative character as the absence of one side of the body has
created a new condition, a new organic environment, that has in turn created a
new type of radiate structure, and at a single stroke initiated the evolution
of a new class of animals. Organic readjustment, during this crisis, was no doubt
extremely rapid. But after the essential changes took place, elaboration toward
a more active neuro-muscular existence practically ceased. The history of this
ancient phylum indicates that it never completely recovered from the effects of
this radical metamorphosis, for no other large group of animals, with an equal
grade of organic complexity, shows such a low grade of neuro-muscular adjust-
ment to its environment.

C. Chiten and the Exoskeleton as Creative Factors.—Chiten is one
of the most characteristic features of the arthropods, and like the cellulose wall
of the plant cell is a creative factor of very great significance.

It is tough and flexible, but inelastic; it is capable of great hardness and
forms for the entire external surface of the body a water- and air-proof covering,
unaffected by any chemical changes likely to occur in the surrounding media.
More perhaps than any other factor it controls the form of the body, its method
of growth, the distribution and attachment of muscles, the character of the appen-

460 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

dages, and of the sensory and respiratory organs. Its chief significance therefore
lies, not in its occasional and purely incidental usefulness, especially in the higher
forms, as a material to construct supplementary organic instruments, or weapons
of offense and defense, but in its compelling influence on form, and in its
creation of an internal organic environment distinct from that of the surrounding
medium.

Chiten appears at a precisely defined period in arthropod embryos, as the
result of some chemical transformation that takes place on the outer surface of
ectoderm cells. Its presence is at once recognized by the way in which it pre-
vents the penetration of stains and other chemical reagents. ‘There is no reason
to doubt that it appeared in the ancestral arthropods with corresponding rapidity,
and that it had an immediate and persistent transforming effect on those animals
in which it occurred. From the earliest period, therefore, every member of
the arthropod stock has been a practically closed mechanism. Its sensory,
respiratory, and excretory relations with the exterior were necessarily confined to
precisely located, and definitely constructed points, or openings. The location and
attachment of muscles,and the movements of one external part on another, were
controlled by the location of flexible, hinge-like joints in the armor; and no
notable increase in volume or in organic activity could take place without special
provisions for the circulation of a blood-like plasma that should serve at the same
time as a uniform internal environment, distinct from the external one, and that
was suitable both for cell growth and as a means of transporting nutritive and
waste substances to their place of consumption or point of discharge.

The presence, therefore, of a chitenous exoskeleton in the arthropods may
be regarded as one of the primary causes of their slow growth in volume and of
the early historic appearance of precisely located sensory, motor, excretory, cir-
culatory, and respiratory organs; and of their sharply defined, closely knit, and
potentially sound organization.

These conditions are in sharp contrast with those in the naked, soft bodied
ceelenterates, and in many worms, molluscs, and acraniates, where the surface
of the body is more uniformly exposed to external agents, and the external medium
has great freedom of access to the interior.

The sudden loss of a chitenous exoskeleton, after a longer or shorter period
of control, is no less significant than its initial formation. When some com-
paratively insignificant change in its chemical composition, or in its mode of
growth, led to a radial change in its physical properties, or to its complete dis-
appearance, the body was again released from its control and a new set of form-
creating factors arose, but on a different level from the old. The change from a
chitenous armor to one of cellulose was a powerful factor in the creation of the
tunicate type; and the almost total absence of chiten in Balanoglossus, Cephalo-
discus, Amphioxus and the polyzoa; the substitution for it of a heavy armor of
isolated calcareous plates in the echinoderms; and the predominance in it, of
a heavy calcareous deposit in the cirripeds, were all factors of great

INCREASING VOLUME OF THE YOLK SPHERE AND BRAIN. 461

importance in controlling the mode of life, the method of growth and the direc-
tion and progress of evolution in these phyla.

In the craniates, the characteristic chitenous exoskeleton of the arthropods
is doomed to extinction, owing to conditions created by its own mode of growth.
It has been shown, for example, that in Limulus a peculiar and exceptionally
vigorous method of growth in the skeletogenous tissues gives rise to a system
of subdermal, interlocking trabecule that probibits the subsequent periodic
removal of the exoskeleton. A condition is thus produced that compels the per-
manent retention of the chitenous products within the tissues of the animal, and
which initiates the formation of a new type of exoskeleton that is largely sub-
dermal, cellular, and fragmented. This permits a new mode of growth for the
animal as a whole, differing from the old in much the same way that the growth
of an endogenous stem differs from that of an exogenous one; and it ultimately
liberated the arthropod stock from the bondage of an increasingly restrictive,
burdensome, and menacing armor. This new type of skeleton itself practically
disappears in the higher vertebrates, giving place to the new framework of carti-
lages and bone that constitute the internal skeleton.

D. The Increasing Volume of the Yolk Sphere as a Creative Factor.—
The local retardation of growth caused by the presence of yolk in the developing
ovum has long been recognized by embryologists, but they have not recognized
the form controlling conditions created by apical growth on a spherical surface.

The gradual increase in the size of the yolk sphere throughout the arthropod
and lower stages of the vertebrate stock creates a new set of conditions that greatly
modifies the process of development; for the growth of an embryonic metamere
over the surface of a yolk sphere is a different problem from the growth of a new
metamere added to the apex of a mature animal. One spreads film-like in mer-
cator projection over an approximately plane surface, the other grows as a solid
body round a central point. When the size of the yolk sphere is increased, the
number of metameres so affected is increased, and the effect on each metamere
will depend on its location in the series, that is, whether it lies at the head or tail
end, whether it has to grow round the equator, or round the poles of the sphere.
In this way the size of the yolk sphere controls the structure and mode of growth of
the heart, the belly navel, and germ wall, and has created the phenomenon of
concrescence.

Thus, owing to the difference in the location of metameres on a yolk sphere
of variable dimensions, inevitable differences arise in the conditions under which
these metameres are compelled to grow, and these differences are increased, or
exaggerated, with the increasing volume of the yolk sphere. These differences
in conditions coincide to a large extent with the morphological and physiological
differences that characterize the corresponding regions of the body, and may be
assumed to be the causes that have brought them about.

E. The Increasing Volume of the Brain as a Creative Factor.—A con-
spicuous feature in the evolution of the arthropods is the steady increase in the

462 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

volume of the sensory and nervous centers located in the more anterior metameres
of the head and trunk, and the corresponding decrease of the lateral plates, to-
gether with the alimentary, locomotor, and mesodermic elements belonging to
the same metameres.

Structural changes of very great moment are inevitably brought about by these
conditions. Owing partly to: the presence of yolk, from which all the growing
tissues can draw their sustenance without the intervention of an alimentary canal,
the nervous system attains a very considerable volume, and becomes functional
long before the stomodzum is called into action. ‘This delay in its development,
its unfortunate location, and its comparatively delicate epithelial walls, places the
stomodeum under a heavy handicap in its competition for space with the nervous
system. ‘The result is that the increasing size, precocity, and more intimate union
of the cephalic neuromeres during early embryonic development, leads to a gradual
narrowing of the nerve ring surrounding the cesophagus, making in many arthro-
pods, for a longer or shorter period, a fluid, or semi-fluid diet (.e., blood-sucking,
parasitic, or scavenging) more and more imperative. The same increase in
volume and in precocity of the cephalic neuromeres also led at an early embryonic
period to the invagination of the entire brain, so that with the closure of the neural
crests and palial fold, the old mouth, which opens into the floor of the brain
chamber, became completely shut off from the outside world, and could no longer
perform its normal functions.

The increasing precocity of the cephalic neuromeres and the diminishing
volume of the corresponding lateral plates also lead to the formation of a more and
more prominent head fold, and to the transfer of the oral-arches, which in the
arthropods are neural or lateral in position, to the hemal surface of the head.
(Figs. 32, 33, 157.) There they converge toward the old dorsal organ and
cephalic navel that constitutes the center for the formation of the new mouth.

The actual closure of the old mouth, the opening of the new one, and the
transfer of the jaws to the hemal surface of the head, were, therefore, brought
about in a large measure by the action of the same forces. These events, by the
final upsetting of a long established organic equilibrium, took place rapidly, the
consummation of one event probably accelerating the other; they also led toa
rapid readjustment in other parts, and to important changes in the mode of life,
especially in the mode of feeding and in the position of the body in locomotion.

ra # * * 9 * * * *

F. The Creation of a New Environment for the Eyes.—The location
of the vertebrate eye in the walls of a hollow brain has caused much discussion.
We have shown that these so-called cerebral eyes did not originate in situ as
the result of the stimulating effect of light acting on the brain through the body
walls of a transparent ancestor, or by use, or natural selection. They are
merely the ancient median and lateral eyes of the arthropods in a new position.
They have been forced into the brain chamber by an accident, as it were, because

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A NATURAL SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION. 463

they happened to be located near the margin of the rapidly infolding neural plate.
One may observe in the arthropod stock the steady approach of this inevitable
disaster to the visual organs, brought about by the increasing precocity of the
embryonic brain and optic ganglia. It is important to observe that under the
existing conditions there is no half-way position for the eyes; they are either carried
wholly inside, or remain wholly outside the brain, and that once inside there is no
escape for them. But the very slight difference in the physical conditions that
finally precipitates the eyes into the brain cavity, creates at once an immense
difference in the physical conditions under which the eyes, the brain, and indeed
the whole anterior part of the head must complete its development. At one stroke
the lateral eye is changed from the superficial type seen in the invertebrate to that
which, in the vertebrate, lies in the walls of the cerebral vesicle.

The actual closing of the old mouth and the opening of the new one, the
transfer of the oral arches to the hemal surface of the head, and the transfer of
the lateral eyes to the interior of the cerebral vesicle, brought about a great crisis
in the evolution of the arthropod-vertebrate stock; and the successful consum-
mation of these internal organic changes constitutes the most important event in
the evolution of the animal kingdom.

The organic adjustments referred to above were necessarily rapid in their
progress and revolutionary in their effect. But the evolution of the conditions
that led up to them was extremely slow, consisting of a long series of cumulative
internal events that had no immediate bearing on the use or the character of the
organs that in the end were most vitally affected. In the arthropods, we may
follow in detail through an immensely long period of time, and in a long series
of animals, the steps that led up to this inevitable crisis. The rapid succession
of readjustments that followed gave rise to a sharply defined, remarkably short-
lived, transitional phylum, the ostracoderms. After that stage is passed, the
organs in question remain practically stationary through the whole vertebrate
series from fishes to man.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A NATURAL SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION.

A consideration of the facts discussed above, to which many more might
be added, throws a new light on variation and environment and on the meaning
of a natural system of classification.

A natural system of classification is an attempt to represent in graphic
form a genealogical tree of the animal kingdom, and in so far as it is a true record
of evolution and descent, it should reflect the guiding and controlling factors that
have created it.

If natural selection and external environment are the important factors
in creative evolution that they are frequently assumed to be, then there should
be reflected in a natural system of classification a broad correlation between
structure and environment that could be used as an aid in the making of it. But
this is not the case, for we do not usually divide animals, according to their mode

464 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

of life or environment, into those for example, that live in fresh or salt water, or
in the air, or on the land, etc.

If variation, from whatever cause, is invariably minute and of equal specific
value, then a perfect record of the past, that is, the genealogical tree, should show
a continuous system of branches composed of a uniformly graded series of animals.

But while it may be possible to arrange the members of certain small sub-
divisions of the animal kingdom into minutely graded linear series, it is usually
exceedingly difficult to determine which end of the series is the base and which
is the apex, because a considerable gap usually exists between the offshoot and the
presumably parent stock.

The speculative zoologist often attempts to fill this gap with hypothetical
forms having the desired intermediate characters, on the assumption that con-
necting adult forms, as numerous and finely graded as on any of the modern
terminal branches, once existed, but are now either extinct, or unknown, or
both extinct and unknown. Some morphologists assume, for example, that the
vertebrate stock had its origin in such forms as the annelids, echinoderms, tuni-
cates, or enteropneusta, and that the enormous series of animals necessary to fill
the gap between them and the vertebrates are now extinct and will remain for-
ever unknown.

But there is no evidence to show that the true genealogical tree is, or should
be, a minutely and uniformly graded series of animal forms. On the contrary,
we have shown that the internal creative factors are of very unequal value and
that they are exceedingly variable at different times, giving rise to well defined
periods in phylogeny during which many large and important changes of form take
place. Hence while some of the apparent gaps in our imperfect genealogies may
be filled by the discovery of new forms, it is evident that the ideal phylogenetic
tree of the animal kingdom must be in reality a loosely articulated system, con-
sisting of slender, interrupted, or vanishing basal stems, expanding into top-
heavy branches. In other words, it was minutely graded in certain places only,
notably on the older terminal branches. There the differences may well be either
the minute so-called continuous variations of Darwin, or the sharper, discon-
tinuous mutations of De Vries.

But the larger natural subdivisions of the animal kingdom, in some cases at
least, appear to be separated by real gaps, much larger than any known mutations,
and that are not due to defective records. ‘They represent periods, varying in
intensity and in duration, of rapid transformation in definite, predetermined di-
rections, followed by periods of slow development along more varied, but less
revolutionary lines. These gaps can never be filled by the discovery of new
forms, for in reality they represent changes of pace in evolution, or periods of
greatly accelerated evolution, which in perspective, and by comparison with
other periods, appear as gaps.

A phyletic metamorphosis of this character I have named a methallosis.*

17To rush after, to leap from one ship to another.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A NATURAL SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION. 405

It may be defined as a marked change of pace in phylogeny; or a rapid succession
of important embryonic variations due to the upsetting of a long-established con-
dition of organic equilibrium; or to some organic change, insignificant in itself,
but which at once creates new conditions for the growth of the organs so affected,
or of other organs. The extent of a methallosis maybe measured by the extent of
the variations and by the length of the period in which they occur.

During ontogeny there are well-marked periods of accelerated development,
quite independent of growth or increase in size, during which there is a rapid
succession of profound structural changes, followed by longer periods of slow
development. These periods of accelerated development are well known as
metamorphoses, or transformations. When seen in perspective, they appear
as gaps separating distinct periods of life. They represent no doubt the onto-
genetic repetition of periods of accelerated race development, the accelerated
period, in the latter case, representing the real gaps between the larger subdivisions
of the animal kingdom.

If the variations that have given rise to new animal forms are indiscriminate,
diverging in all conceivable directions from the parent stock, then the actual
genealogical tree that is the result of such indiscriminate variation, and as con-
trolled by natural selection, should show a recognizable correlation between the
structure of a given group of animals and its surroundings. But this is so toa
very limited extent only, and only in regard to minor or superficial features of
organs that have long existed under other conditions.

The underlying basic structure of the organism is in no way modified by the
mode of life or by the surroundings, for all segmented animals, whether they live
in the air, in water, or on the land, agree in their mode of growth and in the
relative positions of the principal organs, such as the central nervous system,
alimentary canal, heart, eyes, olfactory organs, etc. The same thing is true of
the whole great class of vertebrates, where the basic structure of the jaws, gill
arches, the brain, and principal sense organs, is immutable, and identical for
every member of the class. This established structure has rigidly defined the
possibilities of evolution in the past and it will control the actual development of
the future.

The power of articulate speech, for example, depends on the structure of the
lips, jaws, tongue, larynx, and the respiratory organs, and upon a definite nervous
association of these parts. It is a highly characteristic faculty of man, yet the
organic basis of the entire complex mechanism preexists, and the framework is
already set up in the fishes, where the rudiments of all these organs are known
to occur and where they have in the main, the same mode of growth, inter-
relations, and nerve connections they have in man.

In the same broad sense, the basic structure of the arthropod rigidly de-
termines that of the fishes, and the fishes that of man. The main highways
of evolution are therefore mapped out by the initial structure of the most remote

ancestors. To that extent, evolution is direct, orthogenic, predetermined. It
ie)

406

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

Fic 307.

THE EVOLUTION OF VERTEBRATES. 407

Ha Ln,

eaeean:

Saas pee
U

Fic. 308.

468 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

is dependent on antecedent structure, and that is automatically created in the
process of growth and organic readjustment.

* * 2k ok * * * * bd

There are therefore various aspects of evolution; some are over-emphasized
by one school of biologists, and ignored by others, because the creative factors
have widely different values at different periods of evolution, and in different
fields of investigation.

There is no master key to evolution. It does not always move in the same
way; not always by continuous, nor always by discontinuous variations; it is not
always direct, orthogenic, determinate; not always indeterminate; heredity is not
always a controlling factor, nor does it always control in the same way; neither
does the external environment, nor use, nor disuse, nor natural selection. All
are real factors and all have doubtless played some part in the grand total of
results, but each has a different value, more here, less there, and these values
have changed with the progress of evolution. They are as varied as life itself.

Fic. 307, 308.—Diagrams illustrating the principal stages in the evolution of segmented animals (syncephalata).
They illustrate: a. The spasmodic increase in the number of metameres, the advent of each new group (tagma)
marking a distinctly higher level in evolution, of class, sub-class, or divisional value. b. The approximate historic
period at which new functions and organs, demanded by the new internal conditions, make their appearance; ¢.g.,
circulatory, respiratory, locomotor. c. The initial location of the most important functions and organs. d. The most
important changes in the location of functional centers, due to the transfer of organs to other regions, or to their
degeneration or atrophy, and the appearance of new organs elsewhere to take their place. The substitution of
new organs and functional centers for the old is apparently always in a hemad, or caudad, direction, never cepha-
lad, orneurad. The most striking change in the location of old organs is the transfer of the appendages and as-
sociated parts (visceral arches, nerves, muscles, and ganglia in an anterior hzemal direction, the process beginning
with the oral or anterior thoracic arches of primitive crustacea and attaining completion in the mammals, with
the transfer of all the branchial arches to the anterior hemal surface of the head. One of the principal causes
of this change in the position of organs is the atrophy of all the organs on the corresponding hemal surface of
the head. The most striking illustrations of local atrophy, and the formation in the younger, more posterior

metameres, of new organs or parts of organs serving the same purpose are shown by the locomotor, L, sexual, Q ,

excretory, X, digestive, D, and circulatory organs, C, e¢. The substitution of one organ for another. The most
striking illustration is the closing of the old mouth and stomodzum, and the formation of a new opening into the
mesenteron in the region of the ‘‘dorsal organ,’’ 7.e., on the hemal surface of the procephalic and anterior dia-
cephalic region, Other examples are the substitution of lungs for gills; and of local expansions of the lateral or
pleural folds of the trunk, that serve as balancing, supporting, and locomotor organs, in place of the cephalic
appendages, f/. The permanency and very great antiquity of the more anterior cephalic organs is strikingly shown
by the procephalic structures, such as the median and lateral eyes, olfactory organs and their ganglia, the primi-
tive ‘‘hemispheres,”’ cerebellum and stomodeum. g. The most striking innovation is the perforation of the walls
separating gill sacs and enteric diverticula. #. The rise and decline of metamerism. Metamerism is never complete
or perfect at any phylogenetic or embryonic period, or in any region. It attains its highest expression in the mid-
body region of the higher arachnids and is but very incompletely expressed in the anterior cephalic and
caudal regions. The decline of metamerism begins in the higher arachnids, ostracoderms, and primitive verte-
brates, and makes its appearance first, and in the most marked degree, in the oldest or most cephalic regions, and
more on the hemal than the neural side. That is, it follows the primary axes of growth and structural differ-
entiation. 7. Result. Each new local growth, atrophy, transfer, substitution, or innovation, of parts is interlocked
with all the others, inevitably creating new conditions pregnant with new structures and activities. The process is
most conspicuously manifest in the gradual creation of the mammalian “ head” and “ body,” with the old struc-
tural units in a totally new and different organic relation from the initial one. The final, permanent relation of
part to part, and of the new to the old, is a logical, inherently necessary one, the most important internal factors
in bringing it about being priority of origin, the imperative demands for intercommunication and distribution of
products, mechanical balance, coherency, and stability.

The following capital letters signify the location of the principal functions: C, Cardiac, or circulatory;

D, digestive; G, gustatory; L, locomotor; M, masticatory; R, respiratory; X, excretory; § ,sexual, Other letters

as before: A, naupliusstage; B, ostracode; C, cladoceran; D, merostome; E, transitional; F, larval fish; G, am-
phibian; H, mammalian.

THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF EVOLUTION. 469

In the creation of the great phyla of the animal kingdom, natural selection,
external environment, heredity, use and disuse, have played an insignificant,
subordinate part. They may check, or stimulate, or eliminate in a quantitative
manner, but they are not primarily creators of structure or of organization.

The familiar ‘Deus ex machina” of heredity and natural selection, may be
summoned to account for the absence of organs that ought to be present, or to
account for the elimination of mechanisms that will not work, but they are power-
less to explain the method by which a given change in one organ or organism
creates a change in some other organ or organism.

The creative power of internal environment is always present, always active,
always changing. But the basic chemical elements of life are the same as they
always have been; and the cosmic, inorganic environment has changed but little
since the dawn of organic evolution. It is the internal, organic environments,
and the social and communistic environments that have gained in power with the
progress of evolution, and that are the most important expressions of it.

The foundations of organic structure are therefore laid down and locked
up within the narrow bounds of internal environment, forming a self contained
system that grows and creates from within, and which is essentially unmodified
by changes in the external environment, except those that are absolutely pro-
hibitive of all life.

Social and communistic environment are later, secondary products, that
lend effectiveness to selection in proportion to their own evolution; that is, accord-
ing to the degree to which the life at large of one group of organisms is interwoven
or interlocked with that of others.

Creative evolution is the progressive interlocking of one activity with another,
to a common end, each moulding the other, and all moved by the mainspring of
a common external medium. It is expressed in a perpetual flow of newly created
organisms, and the form and action of each one, and of its constituent parts, can
alone indicate the nature of the forces that have created them.

Hence comparative morphology and phylogeny must always constitute the
fountain head whence comes our knowledge of creative evolution. Such prob-
lems as the phylogeny of vertebrates are therefore the most important ones the
biologist has to deal with, for on their solution depends our conception of the way
in which evolution actually has taken place.

Comparative morphology has no value except in so far as it points out the
historic sequence of organic forms and functions, and reveals to us the trend of
evolution and the causes that direct and control it. In that morphology stands
supreme, for the thin red trail that marks the orbit of evolution is the only index
we have of life as it was and shall be. If our reconstruction of phylogenetic
lines is hopelessly wrong, then indeed will ontogeny be a false guide, and we shall
be left the hopeless task of reconstructing the life history of eons from the contents
of a test tube, or the products of the breeding pen; or tricked into the hope of

au

470 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

stemming the tide of evolution with a scalpel, a rule of conduct, or a dietetic
formula.

It is not surprising that the large expectations of the outdoor naturalist, the
cytologist, the experimental evolutionist, and the animal breeder have not been
realized.

The cytologist is too intent on the raw materials of life; his field of operation
is both too remote and too narrow to give either measurable detail or perspective.
To discover the immediate causes of any given stage in the evolution of the nervous
system, or of the endocranium, by a study of chromosomes, or of protoplasm,
or by juggling with imaginary hereditary units is as hopeless a task as it would
be for the geologist to explain the delta of the Ganges by an appeal to the com-
position of cosmic matter.

The naturalist is bewildered by the amazing detail of the finished product,
and so much absorbed in the social organization of the present moment, or in the
relation of one plant, or animal to the other, and to the environment at large, that
he fails to acquire an adequate historic perspective.

The experimental evolutionist, for a few hours, or months, arbitrarily nar-
rows the environment of an organism, and measures the results, if any, with
instruments of precision, or with the aid of the higher mathematics; but he gener-
ally ignores, or looks with contempt, on the vast experiments already performed
for him, where the laboratory is nature, and the results are expressed in species,
genera, and classes.

The comparative morphologist aims, not merely to trace the identity of
changing structures under the disguise of new forms, but to measure the rate of’
these changes, and to seek out the underlying causes that have brought them
about. He is heavily handicapped by the lack of materials that can be precisely
measured or controlled. But on the other hand there is a certain advantage

Fic, 309.—Diagram illustrating the phylogeny of the principal subdivisions of the animal kingdom. The
numbers indicate approximately the periods at which some of the more important events in the evolution of
structures and functions have taken place.

51, Fixation of balanced internal temperature; 50, decline of yolk volume, and perfection of uterine gestation;
49, Maximum size of yolk sphere; 48, decline of exoskeleton and notochord and perfection of endoskeleton; 47;
evolution of larynx, cochlea, ear-bones; 46, decline of gills, closure of gill clefts; 45, pectoral and pelvic appendages,
supporting and digitate; 44, lungs; heart, three-chambered; 43, second migration to land; 42, elongation, and joint-
ing of pectoral fins; 41, air bladder; 40, median fusion of paired jaws; fixation of maxilla; 39, decline of meta-
merism; 38, decline of cephalic appendages and rise of lateral folds and paired fins; 37, merging of endo- and exo-
skeletal elements, and calcification of endo-skeleton; 36, vertebral rings; heart two-chambered; 36a, decline of
predatory life; 35, gill sacs unite with, and perforate the gut; 34, leg-jaws; three pairs transferred to the haemal
side; 33, neuron continuous; tubular; infolding of the lateral eyes; 32, closure of neurostoma; rise of hamos-
toma; 31, increased size of forebrain and cephalic sense organs; 30, increase of endo-skeleton, endocranium, noto-
chord and gill cartilages; 29, new generation of caudal metameres; new trunk and tail flexible laterally; 28,
postanal concrescence of the germ wall; 27, increase in size of eggs and in the volume of yolk; 26, exoskeleton
thickened, trabeculate, cellular, fragmented; 25, notable increase in size and improvement in locomotor and
predatory organs; carnivorous; 24, first invasion of land; 23, respiratory appendages, forming infolded sacs;
22, parietal eye enclosed in forebrain vesicle; 21, endocranium; 20, leg-jaws, multiple, paired, neural; 19, tagmatism,
and linear distribution of function; 18, metamerism perfected; number small; 17, heart; internal circulation;
16, rise of excretory organs; 15, body plasma; separation of internal and external media; 14, exoskeleton, water
proof, chitenoid, non-cellular; 13, coelom, teloccel; 12, metamerism perfected; 3 to 7 in number; 11, pursuit and cap-
ture; 10, appendages become locomotor, grasping, respiratory; 9, cephalic sense organs, median and lateral eyes
and olfactory organs; 8, bilateral symmetry; 7, gastrulation; 6, radiate symmetry; 5, neuron circumoral; 4, enteron
opening directly to exterior; 3, early evolution of tissues; 2, evolution of cells; 1, evolution of protoplasm.

PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. 471

ammalia.

\ e 2K Masia

Silurcian.| Devoni an|Carb Per Te. Ju. Cv.

Cambvian.| Ordovician &

Pr otevoz oic.

2 rotozoa
1

Fic. 309.

472 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.

inherent in the very size and remoteness of his problems, that is absent in the
brief laboratory experiments that have taken place under the eye of man. His
problems must be viewed from a great distance, but one that gives a large per-
spective, and draws a vast range of structural changes into a single horizon where
sporadic details disappear, and only those events catch the eye that are massed
around some central cause or are ranged with monotonous regularity along some
common line of physiological upheaval.

* * * * * * * * *

In so far as we may judge from the teachings of morphology, the perfection
of physical organization is reached in man. ‘The structural differences between
him and the higher mammals are insignificant; but the potential differences
created by his upright gait, his use of the hand as a tool, his power to make
his experience the property of another, to look into the past at what occurred
before his existence, and to predict what will occur when he has ceased to exist,
are faculties of great creative power, which in a true biological sense constitute
the supreme crisis of organic evolution, and mark the advent of man as the
beginning of a new class of animals.

Organic evolution is progressive differential growth, in more intricate, ever
narrowing environments. It is primarily concerned with obtaining, preparing,
and distributing the raw materials of life; in perfecting the coordinate action of
the great bodily functions; and in establishing more economic biologic and cosmic
relations. In man, growth and the internal organic adjustments to the above
indicated ends have reached their optimum level, and progress in that direction
has practically ceased. Further progress must be in the extension of man’s con-
tact with, and control over nature by the creation of instruments of power and
precision; in the development of his intellectual, artistic and sympathetic facul-
ties; in perfecting the social organization of humanity, and in the creation of social
consciousness.

EAPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

Ge Gspigieniy eee eee eet Anus; bony axial rod supporting the cephalic appendages.
QD issu ayelok mel hie aan Abdomen.

abias vessn ss 6s eeererere Abdominal or branchial appendages.
ADC) hcg Sacchi pies Ccelomic chambers of the abdomen.
ADM: 5 246 vs ties glyseee eas Abductor branchial muscle.
absticccascuwins si eres tie Abdominal temperature organs.

BO peupataent teu resee ee Anterior cornua; atrial or peribranchial chamber.
a.card...................Anterior cardinals.

Acc cise Heo see ee eves Anterior dorsal plate.

Ade iacamsqemscenete foe Anterior dorso lateral plate.

ALO Pe Jil Sevindinas eee oes Row of teeth on anterior margin of mandible.
Of cove awricneneayyeesees Ant-orbital foramen.
BBicciccce cane ganna ates wALpeNtea.

ADsCO.g oer sien Moons Anterior hemal commissure.

ADs os 9 4 eo mokeneaewesen Anterior hemal process.

Blast eiiah Daher nas Anal lobe.
a.lm...............+....Alary muscle.

BD oedema eee Anterior marginal line of canal organs.
(200 ae een Ame emeree ee OTe Anus.
am.c.....................Anterior commissure.

AMD. COs: jars cn newt si Anterior neural commissure.
an.p.....................Anterior neuropore.

ANP vise esGees yest hes Anal plate.

BN oh bead eke eed Anterior neural spine.

AO es tesuihe ggrediasartaaghedasy shad Aorta.
ao.ar....................Aortic arch.

AD ig chara days see week Apical plate; appendages.

BD isda bd GPa ale Rai Anal plate.

B Pley sus ou koe eee ES Apical plate.
@.Pificiaeoansases piven ts Anterior bony entapophysis.

BR isdn gre eek ee heagian Milde Anterior sclerotic plate.

Aly. we y.o waa eae Snes Atrium; antenne.

AUCH etch ccheemdleGy Atrial chamber; vestibule.

ALG pana a sa yaeaRh esas Excretory duct to antennal segment.
Athi couche sek eaeeesd ade Anterior triangular recess.
au.o..................... Auditory organ.

ON eens wiraetsals Anterior median ventral.

ANVs So ee de ds deer siwis Anterior ventro-lateral plate.
Dassecti asin case scems Basilar plate to the cephalic appendages
Di Chica aah eeets Bice sien ai ra Blood cells.

DOs peewee ween raeawhereas Bud

Dloecisue eee seeks Balancers.

DE. Gh) cee aia senias Blood corpuscles.

DNV iiiccssek ee ee ete ras Belly navel.

DiOnccege cite enten Branchial opening.

473

474

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

Dipl. ..2ssgeiueeirreaacie Basilar plate.
br.......................Brain; brain chamber; procephalic lobes.
brankicovshereane Shee Branchiz.

DI. Cana sie Maas asaeceea5 Branchiccephalon.

DCtak tase aS Branchial cartilage.

Deby ccsee ri weds ....Branchial temperature organs.

b.t-hm or b.t-m........... Branchiothoracic or hypobranchial muscle.
bith s..ce ce seo sexes ts Branchiothoracic nerve.

Dviss Sears) aeaecia Blood-vessel.

CPS otto Aas bh Geant signe Lines of canal organs.

Ci. ok eee ys roneseee Cancelle; corneal membrane; ccelom.
CAD ent Seqnace na enero Cephalic appendages.

cap.b....................Capsuligenous bar of the endocranium; chilarial bar.
card.g.or cd.g............Cardiac ganglion.

CALA AN ceca ied daencds Cardiomeres.

CALdIS...: 641448) Sangaes Cardinal sinus.

Ci Creiicy ® Bat Shae Sethe Sees Canalis centralis; colar ccelom.
CCA bse rhe tiesath ime cege kt Conical pulp cavities.

Cad his) Sete gaa be eat Cephalic disc. Cephalic duct.

c.cl......................Procephalic ccelom.
C.CMl, ...c0n8 so etvie aang so Collarnerve:

CiGOys. garcsaer se page zews Cephalic cecum.

COR x ec encih nye sae 2 oe Cerebrum.

Cerbln vane posed oi dest Cerebellum.

COLD avieted eee tai Cerebral peduncles

Cfo cccecciet e5eecsae.cspCranial floor,

Cio 5 syapee Pek dauyeneesa Corneagen layer; cephalic ganglia; caudal neuromeres.
GH cssenatcn didn baoun Chilaria.

CHB cseccevectagrss gets Cheliceral ganglion.

Chi HAC, seagrass soanars Chelicero-hemisphere cells.

Ch.Btrs ere cece its Chelicero-hemisphere tracts.

Cha geagaeee at ghsce aeons Cheliceral lobe.

CRU bass sesseoweedeeses Chilarial cartilage bar of endocranium.
Chli¢.....ee62s cc8se2 Boe ey Chelicere.

Chipley peinssgeweeg aes Chilarial pleurite.

CHG g nn athiaiitn easy tance Chitenous tubule.

Glo. eae ETE ae eesS Cloaca

Clans hatedayemrnias age Cancellous layer.

C.ms...... een dete ews Cephalic mesoderm.

ON hoses eecs veers dee Procephalic neuromeres; cancelle.
C.maroorc.mv...........-. Cephalic navel; dorsal organ; hamostoma.
CM Ci scccusamusaraadiy eee Neural canal; neuroceele.
COleaceniaseersewe ewe see Canaliculi.

COL aves atra eee ya esse Commissure.

COL Cr saiaks wag hag renSeee Cerebral commissure cells; corona ciliata.
COM. ath eed LESS VE SEY As Cerebral commissural fibers.

COM s 5 sacar tee ese yea ws *.. Nerve to corona ciliata.

COT Gaeta haha ds Belated Cerebral cortex.

COKssess Leite ies aes gkeea Coxal spurs.

Capi deep yes e eee ag ss Collar pore.

CPt Lae eas adw ain Branchial cartilage of embryo

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING. 475

CP a oxtan pases ean oes Peacasten ieee Root-like cephalic outgrowths.

CLAMS 2 Lica tara elena eau Cranium.

CLG cs herYaersbiekeea es Cranial ganglia.

cu.d.....................Cuvierian duct.

CUbc So kea gains onde ad be dat Cuticular layer.

CW, 2G str ads Gas Hee eee Circle of Willis.

CEP iavacagae eee neny ...Coxal glands.

CRG et uke traci staren an Deanne Coxo-tergal muscles.

d.andd'.................Dorsal plate; dentine, or dentine-like chiten.

POO ee ee Serer Dorso-branchial line of canal organs.

OC yh Speeds a cohe Behn nape Sensory and glandular ducts.

d.end;ord.e... ......... Ductus endolymphaticus.

Disa Boh E ad ant or OA Res Dorsal fins.

Aide sess snans sca Stan we: Dorsal portion of anal frill.

oO eee Shia ya Rtkad Dicephalon.

GONG we rye geen acess Diencephalon.

CO vcasiaes ishis nig se gies oes Dorsal organ; dorsal opening in cephalic shield; cephalic
navel.

OF.Oso.e see 20s ogy es «Dorsal organ.

Sirgen a Dorsal sclerotic plate.

dt. andsdt®. ccc eveygieeuis Denticles or denticle-like spines.

ean diets nies dade Gus Mesethmoid; enamel layer or enamel-like chiten; ocelli.

CDA: pr icsaccie geet hans External branchial muscle.

CC tedden nd tied e pean betoderm,

OCs. ee aa ane ee Excretory duct.

CCPAVCsscnkekdsees gait us Ecto-parietal eye.

CLR iin Cubes Rt os loud oleate External labials (Drepanaspis); extra-laterals; suborbitals.

Cll Sdeaeantitalnga a eeudiae Primitive gastrula; cephalic endoderm.

Cl. egiee eke sete eee eis Endoderm of trunk.

en.ch....................Endochondrites.

ONC ee accca giz eae is yale dds: Endoceele.

en.cxX....................Entocoxal nerves.

EN.ME.Cl.. cece cee news Endomesoccele.

CNPa Oi cnc deadening Endoparietal eye. -

ent......................Entapophyses.
ep. oreph................Epiphysis; parietal eye tube.

Gin tare ieita aeeten ds Parietal eye tube.

OXsDisg eager eye peae aks External pores.

Cs ee External gills.

BBE oie teteeke as Forebrain.

flab.ot fl: acicsaesy ee age Flabellum.

Ep esa anscen GannAnes Fringing plates.

FP cet hie Leas hee es Free nerve endings; frontals; fleshy portion of the rostrum
PN head ah athg phen es ase Gills; gastrula; germ cells.

a ce Oe re eee tee Gill arches.

PASE acanSrse Giswns bes Gastrula

FG saree Sis ails Gags a MS Anema Germ cell.

P.Cth. OF F.C. ccccvapesans Gustatory center; gustatory tracts.
BEC Ai ck inoue teary ata General cutaneous tracts.

PCUty 22s sibs dave eae de General cutaneous nerves.

Poids se Bieenieaeeg Gustatory ganglia.

476

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

ODA rein eioerse seas Cephalic gastro-hepatic gland.
Plein Ghar vee Ouss ek Intraganglionic infolding of the middle cord.
PAV wig eee RoR eesea es Invagination for optic ganglia.

PMC i adannemiceedia az Germ cells.

BN. Cance weeks La eas Gustatory nerve roots.

P04 Ades ws Gustatory organs; genital organs.

PiPescniseavien aicar « eGular plates:
gr..................... .Groove between olfactory organs.

PUP ged snerae en iee ds Gut pouch.

PtP Seas ued ays ..Gustatory tracts.

PUSEM. sosieseeserdeae ws Gustatory nerve.

GUSTO sagan se panacerness Gustatory organ.

PW eesn te hus fae ren sD IEE ES Germ wall.

Bey PGE es HRSA ease: Hypodermis.

Fei ad cratieede ited mas Bony plates covering the hyoid arches.
AS soca HORE EERE Hemisphere association cells.

HaStr seg iidoakse geen Hemisphere association tracts.
HiGisscueadadietgecstveds Haversian canals; hepatic ceca.

he. veedeseuqeauseetsse Hydroccele.

h.co.................. ..Hamal commissures.

Bl, causes Sies core eee Hemal lamina of cephalic shield.

Hits pees tks sata kenes Hyo-mandibular.

DSH Nyy wedad ind hunt seaeaacy Hyo-mandibular line of canal organs.
BitiC vo ¢everss geen eens Hemal nerve cord.

HAG... pesctesisdousad Hemo-neural nerve.

Ht. ekes Beek Hemo-neural muscle.

Be pies aed eared aha Hzmal processes.

Tea eso heehee BAe Hemal roots.

Beri. seed ees pest Sites Horn ridges.

DSi us ataexermsgyarctns Tergal plates of the abdominal half-segments.
HiStiexeis laheca ened he ts Hemostoma.
Dticcccsey gees ices hyeaws Heart

Detfesccsaxaesews Wralen en Heemal tracts.

By ieieie Soy eee Hyoid.

Hy Pie iv ces ech gerade Hypophysis.

Dees Aaah nica de aiiey hae Intestinal nerves (1-10).

venti cheese ekes bierk yee Inter-entapophysial muscle.
LiPeicki gua ena werae Gens Inter-ganglionic infolding of the middle cord.
ig.s.....................Inter-ganglionic spaces.

PAM sie, Sea ees tae Ss Gill muscle.

ities egg hes hae ees Inner neurilemma; neuroglia.

BGS cts ooh see inne ech tials Intestinal nerve.

108). Shon BE Seas Post-oral or mesocephalic neuromeres.
LO.liveugessaed dagnnsaede Infra-orbital line of canal organs.

APes i ewhns Cee te ete Internal pores.
ipl...................... Intestinal plexus.

LS Tsoae ea hent tees peck hee oe Transverse ridge-plate on inner surface of the premaxille
BSD icpradpir an aidasal naa Inner neurilemma sheath.

LY 5c RSET ee ERA Infoldings leading to neural canal.
IVLO.8 as gehceayes ns ...-Invagination for lateral eye-ganglion.

VOL, cg a cuncrr aa nemncn as Invagination for olfactory lobes.

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING. 477

IVLOP Bs cian wet ta censanes Invagination for optic ganglion.

D7 condscenga tse ones tase Lacune; lateral plate; labrum.

Labimss cosa neoaateieatara Longitudinal abdominal muscle.

Waban: toed tereacawers Longitudinal abdominal nerve.

la.f......................Lateral fold.

Ligh one seodgae sentences Lemmatochord.

VCithy cnncnemnagadeeauacn Lateral cardiac nerve.

VCO... 3h Howe heh Be Longitudinal connectives.

Llicord..g4e%. aeiay re egees Lateral cord.

iGo x can r.gaeons at yaaanea Lateral ethmoids; lateral eye.

Men) eee nea tes Lateral eye nerve.

Lee Ysee eee ete da we ghdeds Lateral eye.

LOY. Bsus te cen astauw ne 4 Lateral eye ganglion.

eye bots Sane lee eres Lateral eye nerve.

La. cisaeeigh ees ise poses «Lateral fold,

Pie, aero a goad whedon Lung

Ig.b. or I.b............... Lung book.

Vi hithiec ian dade fake gs eed Longitudinal hemal tract.

De satis Gabadesee es Ue aden alisha se Lateral line of canal organs.

TAO. cc hen ade sad eens Lateral lobes to the olfactory recess.

| 8) io)» Vea Reece ene ae Lateral bands of the lemmatochord.

Tihs ee ing Bid uct ou,dakind Be Lamelle.

lamiipliy; ceesevesdswarees Nerve plexus of longitudinal abdominal muscle.

VA cage mite rag age emaunes Lateral nerve.

WS nad ee aed ats .. Lens

Lativthere sey each pegs Longitudinal neural tract.

Lepies Soa dlansuey ae ne eek Lateral process; lateral subdermal process to the mandi-
bular plates.

LD reese sy eecessea ped oo Small bony plates in the fleshy sides of rostrum.

Liplits 2.5 sven ieniesoae Lateral plastro-tergal muscle.

LAr) ies pease Lateral tracts of brain.

Ti ydadesche. ayaiesd toads Mouth; muscles.

man.. ..-Mandibles.

MAK sys seavardvev eases Mazxille.

Mb ec caceeecpacdeaees Midbrain.

Me Cia neo aes eg aoe Merochord; segment of the lemmatochord; marginal cells.

Micdsi.j 1-H vewcennvds Median cardiac nerves.

.CH; 2 3320s ces2 case see Middle chord; median nerve; notochord.

m.cl .. Mesenceele.

MG psxenge- ha Mai gehen d Mandibles.

MsGe. nv: cals wikin dW osensen < Mullerian duct.

mes.c... .. . Mesocephalon.

MICSENGC e.g niaedddeye nin Mesencephalon.

met.c....................Metacephalon.

meten.c...................Metencephalon.

m.f . Median furrow.

m.l.. ..Median line; marginal line of canal organs; mantle layer.

miloh..: 649s set aie Median portion of the lemmatochord.

0 (cee Maxillary lobes.

1144 4e5oiwaceeageaed Muscle markings.

i000 « eee ee ee Median nerve (mouth).

478 EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

MAWMCO> cs sais Siwakeeis Median neural commissure.
NOC Sn Sete ves was estes Median ocellus.
21) Malpighian tubules; madreporite.

m.pl.....................Medullary plate.
M.Y......................Marginal wall or ridge.

MNS: Brite da Meagan eee Mesoderm.

MSC. iis Bae hat eee seas Mesenchyme.

IMIS {ON yes ce ewe dye wees Ho Mesentoderm.

MS: PLENtisiciaeirrcagesases Mesoplastro-entapophyseal muscle.
m.t......................Motor nerve tubes.

Dt ii mancevee a vaeneens Mantle.

Miike weedveeeersines Mazxille.

AX Oe. ic eave aoa ge 5 Excretory duct to maxillary segment.
MEM sate pcornetiwieranrans Maxillaria.

MOP MO scn genset yeean Nerve cord; neuron; neuromere.
MCHC wes cee eg ie ass Neurochordal canal.

DiCOnie adeeb ota sents Neural commissure.
DsClecceicasiaiHiois ese Neural crests.

HEP Aa gestidcacr dese Nephridia.

MOU SD re Seis ad Sela shenionde ar Neuropore.

Delis seu tem aaa sens Neural lamina of cephalic shield.
MN cc ceewees ee 28 eye saalys Neural nerve.

MOO ae sess ergess lecee ss Notochord.

NPs sons y ay eo ees keales Neuropile; neural process; neural plate; neuropore.
np.d.....................Nephric duct.

1 ee ee eee ee Nerve ring.

TiSt rea nee dann lene ee Primitive mouth; neurostoma

MAL dca shasncca ne acteatetey tacts Neural tracts.

DV ste eee aka Gees Neural vessel.
ODidudeies naar wee date Opening to branchial chamber.
OC..........-.....-.....-Ocelli; occipital plate.

OLCi eso ageed sieed ageeg meg Occipital line of canal organs.

OCife wo duekhot WAS PA at oirens Occipital foramen

Ode ised heer eres win hae Oviduct.

OC ng ges ie ees iewsns ay. « (Esophagus.

Ol; $5 BurL ays aeshlageinatansiy sie Primitive olfactory organ; frontal organ.

OL1...................... Olfactory lobes.
ol.lin....................Lateral nerve of olfactory organ.
Olm.n...................Median nerve of olfactory organ.

ORDD.... wissevdurs Grekewes Olfactory neuropile.

OG biedindzactignan orgs Olfactory organ.

OL Gsiganeiiean erage nancies Olfactory recess.
OLWercere ye Pdscasey 6¢5% Ventricle of olfactory lobes.
OM geteeee sa dgemars Circumoral membrane.
OPiigl-oita hoteaSishguedlns Operculum.

OMe iaciatdee wie aeeeees Postorbital valley.

00) ee ee Optic ganglion.

OP MOU. oc tescs/cs ewes enna Optic neurones.

OP: Plimsused oeeg was Optic plate; opercular pleurite.
OPSittesedewnreaerceteg's Opercular segment.

OPsthice, pay Nese gaat ee Optic tracts.

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

479

OPsth Hei sa en ive ices Optic tract to hemispheres.

OT cian acinien as wetu Lateral eye orbit.

OS scorned ee ORas wees SY ee Cardiac ostia.

OSD e seat: Beep ane ee Outer sheath.

OViirng Aoi wel aera Sean Ovaries.

Di cisaheia Peeks garetts External opening of parietal eye tube; epiphysis; anterior
neuropore; opening to endolymphatic ducts; penis
thoracic appendages.

Pasi cgecine ean seus cee Parietals.

| OE: eee Pectoral appendage.

PAY ocicdeses Seance ie Parietal eye.

PACY:8 occas Bisseiees Parietal eye ganglion.

payor? oo... Roots to parietal eye nerves.

DiDirdaeckaly Cie ee pions Posterior branchial line of canal organs.

P.biG. sc gist ghee gees Peribranchial chamber.

P.Chegigurctignaniae cages Paccinian-like corpuscles.

Di Grae peeks inaane a ian Pore canals; proboscis ccelom.

PCa: .cugeediteda tees te Pectoral arch.

PCA sei icndemer serge enw Pulp cavity of denticle.

preard oo5 a dsesewas Posterior cardinals.

PROkeeeaeiaeseresrns ces Prosencephalon.

Dd 2h wei wen sa rmdorce Pericardium.

idk. ome ea eas Posterior dorsolateral plate.

Ped Pdpsensorededragup megs Posterior mandibular dental plate.

Per crtea avian cane. ses Parietal eye.

PLEMcseieYGReEaney epee Parietal eye nerve.

PCC. cc. cage ores eee ove Pectines;

POG. Bisa cs rater Gare aiing dos Pedal ganglion.

p.e.p.....................Pits on inner surface of postorbital plate; posterior parietal
eye pits.

PCr C. Aayicsvderwaneeeete Pericardial nerve.

PiOitsceevieucain cyneeees Parietal eye tubercle.

p-g.......................Polar globules.

PH bork Feee aes cies Pharynx.

P-DiCOe ccc gh simu ekeene y Posthemal commissures.

PIES os pienseicteawadenens Pituitary foramen; passage-way for primitive stomodeum.

Pliapwccceisieie cewek es Pelvic appendage.

pl.cx.....................Plastro-coxal muscles.

Pl ents. coun cwon aan eelese Plastro-entapophyseal muscle.

Plifscseceicieissaicaenea Pleural fold.

Plies 2cdsevaG cca tees a Plastro-tergal muscle.

PHM. os oUhaaihaaahae awe Posterior marginal.

PANN ie ssksesaucisees Posterior median-ventral plate.

PBs ea Ge had hea Pedal nerve.

PHO CO hid gee snes eens Posterior neural commissure.

PDD. oven cesses Seed tee Posterior neuropore.

PiOiC Get herein 4 Seta Preoral chamber.

PiPe hice ehisge Guaicees Posterior process; parietal eye plate; proboscis pore.

Plscswnccteteag seers aks Prepuce; cephalic mantle.

pr.mxX.orp.mx........... Premaxille.

PED OF PLO. oe ew ew ewains Pronephros.

480

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

PLOC es sae eda at atone d Procephalon.

PIOSens castes aN Prosencephalon.

PRSyeysesadssetenggeewes Primitive sheath.

PEL ieee ehlectintieuge teddies Protoplasm.

PSiiscs de eeeen txav eter eis Posterior sclerotics; pancreas.

DSO) nected cee nadie ods Primitive sense organs.

Pls aries ee Pituitary gland or duct.

Pili t cei aig keeps: Primary tentacles.

pet.r....................-Posterior triangular recess.

PiVo cine obveed Pe eevee 4 Posterior median ventral plate; postorbital line of canal
organs.

Plc eee Pulsatile vessel.

PVitiscsessanaepec te he Mass of bony trabecule below the postorbital valley.

Pigs Giewhscekecd sida Ridges; roots to spinal nerves; rostrum.

TiO ce eee Visual rods.

Pelicans nd he Caste ach Gees Rostral line of canal organs.

TOStiged iguer dade se nlk See aie Rostrum.

TES) cde se vy iw Hee ees Shelf plate on the inner surface of the rostrum.

Sicutnets chendaa shauna Bove a Scales; sulcus on the floor of the procephalic lobes; stomach.

SiC ak ceauaw a awake uae Superficial canals; sensory canals.

SiC kos ke h-29g wage ees Segmental cardiac nerve.

S.C NO sess wewaag eeeer lage Subcortical neuropile.

Sidiiin tees rsee reach eke Sucking disc.

S28 cays ec aecagewayge ats Shell gland.

Selena eters Wee tts Superficial layer.

SLC sentien ot aes ewes cabs Cells derived from sheath of-lateral cords. =

SCM. fhkxiawensceancmeed s Sheath to lemmatochord.

SAN Ns scans ee adce See Sheath to median nerve. ee

DO a Sensory canals. ag?

ShOn cera iigiu nd bide ge ambas Suborbital plates; sense organs. ,

8.0.1.....................Supra-orbital line of canal organs.

SPicnupeeutsea se aawks Spindle-shaped dilatation on the sensory tubes; subdermal
process on lateral margin of premaxille.

Stina ere ties Stomach; stomodzum.

Si cee eam aaiad ace ade Sensory tubes.

st.c. or St.cO...... «1... Stomodeal commissure.

St Payne sister ent ese heed Stomodeal ganglion.

SEN cat casiusiermeatne Stomodeeal nerves.

Stic cca Aeete ees Bees wale Stomodeum; stolon.

Peete de dure xt fae tg pete Terminal joint to cephalic appendages; testis.

EsDaeucteearacitiamtras ue Tongue bar.

t.cl.................. ...Teloceele.

TCXin) iaaaes aoe Tergo-coxal muscles.

BED ind 59560 AA aa OER Tear duct; thoracic duct.

telbleseGcun pre R aS Teloblasts.

teléttss ssucqempseiencmegs Telencephalon.

POLO vce acuadraaweonctas Telopore.

Gia Cnn Oe ca sek Cees Groove (for tentacle ?).

tg.prpl...................Tergo-proplastral muscles.

fh ceeiuneamat ain .culen Thyroid.

Chap Gist eiedkeeyevedy Thoracic appendages.

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTERING.

VEC. caucde vrei ee ewees
VCC tke eanscamaae cies

31

Thoracic nerve cord.

Mesoblastic somites of thoracic metameres.
. Remnants of ingested larval tentacles.

Thoracic temperature organs.
Telopore.

Trabeculz

Trabecule cranii.

Tendinous stigmata.

Point of union of vascular canals.

..Ventricle; subneural gland; vestibule.

Vascular canals.
Vas deferens.

. Vagus decussation.

Ventral wall of anal frill.
Vagus (yellow body).

. Vagus appendages.
. .Vagus nerves.

Vagus neuromeres.
Vascular layer.
Ventral margin.

. Wolffian duct.

Yolk cells of head.
Yolk cells of tail.
Yolk navel.

481

Acraniates, 393, 396, 405
appendages, 398
circulation, 401
degeneration, 399
development, 401
heart, 401
mantle, 400
metamerism, 398
nervous system, 399
sexual organs, 401
skeleton, 400

Amphibia, 386

Amphioxus, 393

Anal frill, 371

Anaspida, 364

Annelids, 403

Antiarcha, 367

Appendages, invaginated, 275
locomotor, 249, 268
respiratory, 264
sequence of functions of, 271

Archenteron, 248

Arches, neural, 307

Arthro-dira, 386, 388

Aspidocephali, 358

Asymmetry, as creative factor, 458

Ateleaspide, 363

Atrial, folds, 31
frill, 371

Auditory organ, 120
pit, 39

Balancers, 261
Bdellostoma, oral lobes, 260
Birkeniide, 364
Blastopore, 243-404
Bothroidal cord, 328
Bothriolepis canadensis, 367
atrial frill, 371
cephalic appendages, 376
exoskeleton, 367
eyes, 375
food, 379
gills, 371
hyoid arches, 375
locomotion, 379
mandibles, 374
mode of preservation, 377
mouth, 375
olfactory organs, 375
premaxille, 373
preoral chamber, 373
sensory grooves, 376
viscera, 372
Brain, function of, 174
meaning of term, 41
minute structure of, 71
Branchial cartilages, 306

INDEX.

Branchial neuromeres, 67, 71
warts, I15

Branchiencephalon, 67, 69

Branchiocephalon, 20

Brachiopods, 445

Branchipus, 16

Bunodes, 29

Canalis centralis, 331
Capsuligenous bars, 316
Cardiac ganglion, 202
Cardinal veins, 199
Cartilage, branchial, 307
neural, 306
Caudal navel, 243
Cement organ, of polypterus, 262
Cephalaspide, 358
Cephalization, 26, 254
Cephalic functions, arrangement of, 8
Cephalic navel, 25, 250
Cephalogenesis, in arachnids, 5
in arthropods, 3
Cephalodiscus, 439
Cerebellum, 19
Cerebral hemispheres, 54
Cheetognatha, 448
Cheliceral lobes, 59
neuromere, 59, 62
Chewing apparatus, 188
Choroid fissure, 151
plexus, 19
Circle of Wills, 199
Circulation, 198
Cirripeds, 408
Coccosteus, 388
Ccelom, 407, 426
Ccelomic chamber, 23
Ceelolepide, 364
Commissures, 43, 60, 72, 79, 80, 90
Concrescence, 25, 243-404
Cord, minute structure of, 71
Cornua, 40
Cranial flexure, 40
ganglia, 17
Craniates, 393-395, 403
Creative factor, asymmetry as, 458
brain as, 461
chiten as, 459
exoskeleton as, 459
yolk sphere as, 461
Cyclostomata, 383

Degeneration, 277-279, 280, 281, 288
Denticles dermal, 303

Dentine, 304

Dermal skeleton, 289

Dicephalon, 15

Diencephalon. 18, 57, 58

483

484

Dipnoi, 386
Dorsal organ, 18, 238
Double embryos, 281

Echinoderms, 421
larva of, 422

Ectoprocta, 443

Elasmobranchii, 384

Endocranium, 16, 20, 306, 312, 319, 436, 450

of limulus, 314
of scorpion, 317
summary and comparison, 319
of Telyphonus, 319
Endoskeleton, 306
Enteropneusta, 431
Entoprocta, 441
Epibranchial organs, 17
Epiphysis, 133, 136
Equilibrium, 191
Evolution of bilateral symmetry, 457
cosmic, 454
of creative environment, 454
crices in, 456
of metamerism, 457
of social environment, 454
Eye, ectoparietal, 134
environment of lateral, 462
endoparietal, 134
frontal, 125
lateral, 127, 149
ganglia, 154
lens, 151, 153
parietal, 125, 126, 129
of apus, 138
of branchipus, 136
of limulus, 131
of scorpion, 129
of vertebrates, 139
of ganglia, 142
lens of, 144
placodes, 146
tube, 133, 136

Fiber cells, 232
Fins, pectoral, 251
pelvic, 251
Fission, longitudinal, 282
transverse, 282
Flabellum, 94, 113
Flexure cranial, 65
forebrain, 55
hind-brain, 69
Fringing processes, 269
Frontal eye, 125
organs, 165
Fusiform cells, 447

Ganglia, cardiac, 202
of cord, 97
cranial, 17, 81, 95
habenule, 142
lateral eye, 155
pedal, 81, 95
optic, 62, 154
stomodzeal, 15, 60

Gaskell, 34

Gastrula, 34, 404, 433
in limulus, 227

Gastrulation, 248

INDEX.

Germ disc, 224

layers, 229

wall, 23, 35, 228, 237

concrescence of, 35

Gill arches, 261

external, 261

pouches, 251

sacs, 263
Growth, apical, 246

causes of differential, 215

interpretation of early stages of, 219

Gustatory apparatus, 186
nerves, 84
roots, 84
organs, III
tracts, 84
Gut pouches, 266

Hemal, nerve cord, 43
roots, 77, 8r

surface, orientation of, 27, 221

tracts, 85
Hemostoma, 25, 40
Head cavities, 23

subdivisions of vertebrates, 11

Heart, 39
beat, 207
cardiac ganglia, 200, 202
cardiac nerves, 200

comparison of vertebrate and arachnid, 197

development of, 195
experiments on, 205
lateral cardiacs, 200
location of, 195
pericardial nerves of, 200
segmental cardiacs, 200

Hemisphere association cells, 58
development of, 55

Herrick, 34

Holocephali, 385

Hydrocele, 426

Hypophysis, 260

Infundibulum, 18, 62

Jaws, 250, 255-257

Lateral eye of vertebrates, 151
ganglion, 154

fold, 269

line organs, 121

plates of mesoderm, 22
Leg jaws, 15, 250
Lemmatochord, 323

of lepedoptera, 326

of limulus, 334

of scorpion, 329
Lens, parietal eye, 144
Lerneea, branchiata, 408
Limnadia lenticularis, 409
Lobes olfactory, 13

procephalic, 38
Lobi inferiores, 18-62
Locomotor appendages, 268
Locomotion, 191

Macrocystis, 301
Marine arachnids, 337
origin of, 338

Median fusion and antero-posterior degeneration,

277

nerve, 43
Merochord, 328, 330
Merostomes, 337
Mesencephalon, 18, 19, 65
Mesencecele, 66
Mesocephalon, 15
Mesoderm, 12, 22, 426

lateral plates of, 231

sources of, 230
Metacephalon, 19

Metameres, formation of, in limulus, 225

Metamerism, 49
Metencephalon, 67

Middle cord or lemmatochord, 12, 43, 323

of insects, 324

of limulus, 334.

of scorpion, 328

summary or comparison, 335
Monstrosities, 274
Mouth, 25, 26, 253, 406

closure of, 18, 31, 249, 251

Nauplin, 408
Naupula, 406, 408
Navel, cephalic, 238, 253, 255, 414
Neostoma, 26, 23
Nerves of branchiencephalon, 102
branchio-thoracic, 105
cardiac, 200
circumoral, 42
cutaneous, 105
enteric, 103
gustatory, 84
hemo-neural, 102
hypo-branchial, 105, 107
lateral line, 97
longitudinal abdominal, 104
median, 42
of metencephalon, 98
neural, 94
olfactory, 162
parietal eye, 134
peripheral, 44, 94
arrangement of, 46
differentiation of, 45
of rostrum, 43
Vagal, 107
Nerve ends, 111
roots, 76
hemal, 77, 81
neural, 81
Nervous system, framework of, 43
specialization of, 44;
summary of, 209
Neural arches, 307, 322
sinus, 328
surface, 44
surfaces, orientation of, 27, 221
Neuritemma, 325
Neuroblast, 52
Neuro-ccelia, summary of, g2
Neuroglia, 93, 325, 331
Neuromeres, 49
branchial, cell clusters of, 73
specialization of, 44
cephalic, 80
cell clusters of, 80
components of, 94

INDEX.

Neuropile, cardiac, 204
centres, 79
Neuropore, anterior, 130

Neurostoma, 18, 26, 31, 249, 251, 253, 4060

Notochord, 323 :
termination of, 65

Occipital ring, 316
Ocelli, larval, 125, 128
Olfactory ganglia, 170
lobes, 55, 160, 164, 171
of limulus, 164
organ, 127, 160, 162
of apus, 167
of branchipus, 166
of limulus, 160
of phyllopods, 165
nerves, 162
placodes, 162, 168
Optic ganglia, 13, 62
Oral arches, 16, 40, 255
development of, in frog, 257
surface, 44

Orientation of neural and hemal surfaces, 27, 221

Ostracoderms, 337, 341, 348
auditory organs, 356
cephalic appendages of, 350
cutaneous sense organs of, 356
eyes of, 355
historical review, 342
muscle markings in, 346
olfactory organs of, 356
skeleton of, 351
subdivisions of body, 349
trend of development in, 341
exoskeleton of, 352

Parietal eye, 13, 125
ganglion, 142
nerve, 134

roots, 134

Peribranchial chamber, 428

Phoroinda, 446, 447

Polyzoa, 440

Primitive cumulus, 224
streak, 22, 246

Procephalon, 12

Procephalic lobes, 13, 38

Prosencephalon, 54

Psamosteide, 366

Pteraspida, 364, 366

Pterobranchia, 439

Respiration, 191

Rhabdospleura, 440

Rostrum, 14, 29
nerves to, 43

Saccus vasculosus, 18
Segmental sense organs, 17
Sense buds, cell division of, 51
primitive, 50
organs, 13, I10
auditory, 120
branchial warts, 115
general cutaneous, 110
lateral line, 121
primary, 38
slime buds, 17, 116
special cutaneous, 111
summary of, 209

486

Sense buds, temperature, 110
Skeleton, branchial, 322
dermal, 289
of Ateleaspis, 295
of Limulus, 296
of Astracoderms, 290
of Pteraspis, 293
of Tremataspis, 290
Stomodzal commissure, 19
infolding, 38
ganglia, 15, 60
nerves, 42
Stomodeum, 42, 61
Swallowing reflexes, 189

Tagmata, 26

Taste buds, 17

Tear duct, 260
Teleostomii, 386
Teloceele, 425, 433
Telopore, 22, 35, 246

INDEX.

Thymus, 263
Thyroid, 263
Tracts, general cutaneous, 87
gustatory, 84
lateral, 86
longitudinal hemal, 85°
neural, 86
Tremataspis, 32, 359
Triple embryos, 284
Trochosphere, 34
Tunicates, 415

Variation, 274
Vascular area, 24, 236
Vagus appendages, 19
decussation, 19
nerves, 20
neuromeres, 19-67
region, 19
Vertebrates, 381
Visceral arches, 263

APA Ae
EAA AALS
GA ttAts

Sees

Jy

Mei
MANA
Hey

fie
yy)
Upon perce

y
Ate
f thie
aioe

Miggida
‘ Ha

PRA
RR Lee ay j ee :
Pe p ie 2 Wh
2 VEY VERN cheiyhshoh A ay
“ia TS HPPA Pei ytst EOP PAI PEP bohy 00)
a ee ae y LT bg Hap osteisieepen ee
ae oY A PPO Ay OD
ye te Pes | yy
ph, RRR I iore Matta j
Pee cele Freres Mes)
MERA aT f ERSTE M POP Rr har Por
"5 Pash i Ne PN)
re ta a ‘ Wy, os yy yy
ate (Aste
aaa AMA Gut dy
BAe ead MAA
he PAs
ae
nr i
dias AAs
nearer ep
Nt:
ai
AA
iad
Tiara
md
,
CEN
Weg’
i
mivhatt
a Daas
i
f
Hatt
ii aye
: ste Renta
K PEVPReRP IREAPRESPD UTRERTE DTP HUE M EMER Maat titra :
UNM IPRODATHAEEEH NPS DM Dat A CUINCS Aah Sway
: NN " SENSING ae Ny
. RENN Bhan h Atay
rpcaneiauta st rt Se! Beat ty
ihn TRE Ss Mana \ aN
ny EES at \
Pee Migr tethPen Ath Mbt DA
SNE ceca
“al:
ia)
Y
st?
Tapa
Daetays
obs

eh
del
ee

WA Ty! i
HAAN
Weve lehy eine