Cornell Aniversity Dibrary BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henry W. Sane 1891 6421 ‘ita olin,anx Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http :/Awww.archive.org/details/cu31924031268091 Essays on BacrertoLocy AND ITS RELATION TO THE PROGRESS OF MEDICINE BY THEODORE POTTER, A.M., M.D. 1 PROFESSOR OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY (IN THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF INDIANA, INDIANAPOLIS UNIVERSITY; MEMBER OF CONSULTING STAFF, CITY HOSPITAL AND THE DEACONESS HOSPITAL; CONSULTING PHYSICIAN FOR DISEASES OF THE CHEST, INDIANAPOLIS CITY DISPENSARY THE INDIANA MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHING COMPANY INDIANAPOLIS 1898 PRESS OF SENTINEL PRINTING COMPANY, INDIANAPOLIS, IND. — DEDICATION To My FaTHER Tue ReverenD LupLtow Day Porter, D. D., Lit. D. IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE HOoosIER SCHOOLMASTER “THE MAN I KNOW BEST, AND THE BEST MAN I KNOW” ® THIS LITTLE BOOK IS AFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED VII. VIII. XI. CONTENTS Tur Germ THEORY oF DIsEAsE SoME oF THE PROBLEMS OF BACTERIOLOGY . é Speciric DisEAsSES AND SPECIFIC BACTERIA . SELF-LIMITATION AND IMMUNITY . ‘ Z THE CoNTEST AGAINST INFECTION . i RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT OF PROGRESS : F Anti-Toxic S—eruM THERAPY . ; F F Serum THERAPY IN DIPHTHERIA AND OTHER DISEASES THE Posrrion oF VACCINATION IN PaTHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY ; BacTERIA AND BacrerroLocicAL MEtTHops7,AND Draenosis Non-BacteriaL Factors in Inrectious DisEAsEs 89 99 111 146 PREFACE This publication is the outgrowth of work done for the Indiana profession, having its origin in ‘a series of papers upon the progress of bacteriology presented, by request, to the State Medical Society between the years 1890 and 1897. These papers cover much of the time during which the germ theory of disease was working its way into the convictions of the profession, and it is with some little pride that the author is enabled to feel that of this progress he has been a part. Presented under the special conditions indicated, and in serial form, they have something of a historical character and meaning which, even at the expense of some repetitions, has been in large measure preserved. To these have been added several, partly new, partly prepared for the students of the Medical Col- lege of Indiana or for various medica] gatherings. 6 PREFACE. Those numbered from 2 to 8 in the Table of Contents are given in the order of their preparation, covering the years 1890 to 1896. I am indebted to Dr. E. D. Clark and Dr. C. E. Ferguson for aid in revising the manuscript, and to Dr. A. W. Brayton for constant encouragement and assistance in the preparation and arrangement of the book. Should the presentation of these essays in book form be as kindly received by others as most of them have already been by my friends, the doctors of In- diana, it will be all that the author can ask. INDIANAPOLIS, February, 1898. Essays on BactrerroLocy I. THE GERM THEORY OF DISEASE. HE germ theory of disease, now no longer a the- ory, but a demonstration of science, is a very sim- ple doctrine. It asserts that certain disorders are due to the presence and growth, in the body, of living poisons called microbes, germs, bacteria, and that without such bacteria these diseases do not exist. Notice that certain disorders are said to have this origin; for no one asserts or supposes that all diseases are caused by bacteria. It is the maladies belonging to the group called infectious which are due to living agents, chief among which are the microscopic fungi now commonly known as bacteria or germs. This statement is a sufficient answer to the question, often asked, whether we believe all diseases to be due to microbes. And here we notice two interesting and important facts growing out of bacteriology. The first is that the revelations of bacteriology have altered the classi- fication of diseases, increasing the number of those included among the infections. Thus, the discovery of the germ of diphtheria has resulted in establishing 7 8 ESSAYS ON BACTERIOLOGY. the fact that so-called membranous croup is usually laryngeal diphtheria, and is therefore to be looked upon as an infectious disease. A similar thing is true of pneumonia, and notably of tuberculosis, over the character and classification of which a controversy was waged. We now know that tuberculosis is an infectious disease; a half-century ago this was only surmise. We have learned, too, as a result of bacteriological studies, more of the importance of infection as an in- direct cause of suffering and death. Thus, while we do not consider apoplexy an infectious disease, we have come to see more and more clearly that, in the last analysis, it is frequently a product of infection. The blood vessels of the brain do not break unless they are injured or diseased, and the disease which thus makes a cerebral apoplexy possible is often of in- fectious character or the indirect result of an infec- tion. It matters not that this indirect result is some- times seen only after many years: the fact remains, and must constantly be borne in mind in practical medicine. The man who falls by an apoplectic stroke often falls from an infectious blow struck years be- fore, perhaps when sowing the proverbial wild oats of youth. And thus one may literally reap a harvest of death from seeds sown and long since forgotten. Thus we learn, notwithstanding the charge some- times brought that the germ theory of disease is made to account for too much, that its field of action is ESSAYS ON BACTERIOLOGY. 9 really wider than is commonly supposed. As we look about us and see the havoc wrought, directly and in- directly, we may fairly say that it is hardly possible to -exaggerate the importance of infection and of the minute agents which produce it. The invisible ene- mies are here, as elsewhere, the most numerous and dangerous. . The germ theory of disease is no new thing. Though it has but recently come into prominence, and its truth but recently been demonstrated, it is, as a theory, as old, almost, as history. Crude, ill-de- fined, and as crudely expressed, it has nevertheless been for ages essentially the same. Hippocrates saw and believed in it; and from his day to ours it has served as a rallying cry for warring factions and for the disputes of the learned. At times it has assumed prominence, through the influence of some master mind great in its capacity to grasp a simple and far- reaching truth. Again it has sunk almost into obliv- ion, carried down by the weight of its own artificially and ignorantly imposed absurdities. Thus it has risen and fallen, come and gone, with the varying tide of speculative fashion. In this unstable but endur- ing history there must be some reason, and for it we have not far to look. We can readily see why the germ theory of disease so persistently suggested and asserted itself to men’s minds. They saw many of the facts which we see. They saw a small amount of poison enter the body of 10 ESSAY3 ON BACTERIOLOGY. an animal or man, and afterward that the body con- tained a much larger quantity of the poison. Thev saw one case of a disease enter a community, and afterward they saw, with strong evidence of transfer ~ from one to another, that many others had the disease. From such facts they made the same inference as we do. They said: these poisons seem to grow and mul- tiply; they must be living; for such properties as true growth and reproduction they, as we, only knew as be- longing to living things. And this is the germ theory of disease. When we inquire why this simple and logical doctrine became, at times, contaminated with so much absurdity as to bring it into merited discredit and to even threaten its survival, the answer is not difficult to find. However rational, however logical, it was but a theory, a mere speculation, shrouded in mystery. The ignorant mind loves mystery, and all men love to speculate about that which they cannot prove. We all love to peer into the darkness, and where we can- not see we quickly bring imagination into play.